piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
b-jazz (2026-06-01 15:17:38+00:00): Hey maddog,

What's going on with this course? I see fairways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1524788582 that are a big mess. Why are these being mapped like this? 

There are several like this in your most recent edits.
maddog107 (2026-06-01 15:59:38+00:00): Hi yea sorry, so I made a golf app, and some of my users (test users) wanted to try some of the courses that were not marked on here, and I was sort of in a hurry to mark these, and I wasnt able to review my edits (even though this edit I said it was sitting on my computer for a little bit). I will fix this edit in a little bit, and I will make sure to review my edits in the future. Sorry for doing these courses quickly.
maddog107 (2026-06-01 16:00:08+00:00): And incorectly
rajdhani (2026-06-02 05:12:34+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 183527426
ftrebien (2026-06-16 14:00:15+00:00): Sempre que promover uma estrada de terra a uma classificação mais alta, é importante também informar a superfície dela (surface=unpaved ou surface=dirt) para que os usuários e os sistemas de navegação não a tratem como pavimentada. Muitas pessoas preferem evitar longas estradas de terra quando há alternativas, mesmo que sejam mais longas.
Wildsharky (2026-06-02 11:41:40+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:183484638
afgb1977 (2026-05-31 19:03:29+00:00): Hola JLOSM. 
Podrías revisar la existencia de Golfo Punta del Cerro? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13897989352
Debe ser algún tipo de error en la hoja, este Golfo realmente no existe, el Golfo de Urabá tiene como límite norte una línea recta entre Punta Caribana y Cabo Tiburón. A su vez el Golfo de Urabá hace parte del Golfo del Darién, o mejor dicho el Golfo de Urabá es la parte sur del Golfo del Darién, básicamente no hay un tercer golfo entre estos dos.
Nombres Geográficos de Colombia muestra en esa coordenada un punto llamado Punta del Cerro.
En mi opinión es un pequeño error de la hoja 59IIID, alguien junto el límite norte del Golfo de Urabá y parte del nombre del cabo Punta Cerro de Águila, o juntaron datos con orígenes y escalas diferentes. En Colombia no existe un accidente geográfico con nombre Golfo Punta del Cerro.
mavl (2026-06-10 06:18:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906066 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20776].
mavl (2026-06-10 06:44:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906936 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping.
mavl (2026-06-10 06:44:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906936 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping.
mavl (2026-06-10 06:18:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906066 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20776].
mavl (2026-06-10 06:44:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906936 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping.
neitomonoma14 (2026-06-01 16:34:50+00:00): Good Day fellow editor,

As we are both aiming to ensure that mapping follows de facto principle of control, could you please share any 𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲, 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗿𝗱 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘆 𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲𝘀 you are using to establish 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝘂𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗮𝗱𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹 over that area.

OSM policy requires mapping to be based on verifiable reality. Since access to Sabina shoal is not only contested but also physically accessible to multiple parties, establishing a boundary requires high-quality evidence that can be independently verified. 

To ensure data accuracy and neutrality over this topic, we must prioritize in 𝗱𝗲 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗼 (that is on the ground situation) than de jure (legal claims). We as editors of OpenStreetMap should strive for a neutral, independent, and truthful source of geographic information for everyone. Providing such sources would be crucial for the community to understand how this feature currently meets the criteria for stable, uncontested administration. Without any evidence, mapping this as a definitive territory of any party 𝘃𝗶𝗼𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀 the rules of OSM itself.
旧加卷 (2026-06-02 00:03:51+00:00): Have you read the changeset comment tag? It says "Remove unrelated Wikipedia and Wikidata subject". This changeset, along with my previous edits, has nothing to do with changing the status of Sabina Shoal. Therefore, I may dispel your doubts at my own discretion, but I have no obligation to clarify the subject that you are asking about under this specific changeset.
For your previous changeset regarding the Sabina Shoal, could you respond to those comments before asking for a relevant clarification? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183365372
neitomonoma14 (2026-06-03 09:18:54+00:00): Regardless, your changes in the ownership of Sabina Shoal does not follow the rules of OSM. I just gave justification of why this feature must remain not owned by any party due to the lack of legitimate continuous administrative control of China over that feature. Any de jure legal claim of any nation is not sufficient to be considered to be administrative control.
旧加卷 (2026-06-03 19:42:05+00:00): I've already stated that I did not change the ownership of Sabina Shoal ("This changeset, along with my previous edits, has nothing to do with changing the status of Sabina Shoal"). You acknowledged that "we are both aiming to ensure that mapping follows de facto principle of control", but now you are claiming that my edits does not follow the de facto status?
neitomonoma14 (2026-06-06 11:31:26+00:00): Yeah you are most certainly not following de facto status as Sabina Shoal. Dont deflect any question regarding its status and bringing up my own statements and instead give invaluable data regarding its status
旧加卷 (2026-06-07 05:18:04+00:00): The first sentence is a false statement. The second sentence is based on that false premise. Don't deflect the subject of this changeset.
mavl (2026-06-10 06:17:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906066 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20776].
mavl (2026-06-10 06:44:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906936 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping.
arjunaraoc (2026-06-02 04:43:57+00:00): Hello Harsha514000, You must stop this vandalism.  It took me two full weeks to correct all the vandalism by your sockpuppet deleted account. You must give the status of town to only statutory towns, which have nagar panchayat or municipality as its administrative body.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183424538
felipeeugenio (2026-05-31 12:17:28+00:00): Hello. There is not a single building you marked that resembles the building in the picture. Please take a little more time next edit and use the letter Q to square the polygons.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183424661
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-04 13:00:33+00:00): Looks like you moved Rusty's Custard Factory out of line of the rest of the buildings and into the sidewalk and street area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183424788
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-04 13:04:08+00:00): Got it moved back.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183424788
Glassman (2026-06-01 20:38:17+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183425233
Glassman (2026-06-01 20:39:14+00:00): #TIP: we just add the address to the main building  but otherwise the edit looks good.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183425296
ADAC Touristische InfoSysteme (2026-06-04 05:30:40+00:00): Why did you delete the city? Pease revert changes
Glassman (2026-06-01 20:40:29+00:00): These are highway=service. There are very few living roads in the US, mostly found in Europe. Can you fix?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183425549
Glassman (2026-06-01 20:40:55+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183425789
Glassman (2026-06-01 20:41:17+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183425944
Glassman (2026-06-01 20:41:32+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183426159
Kovoschiz (2026-05-31 07:30:22+00:00): 0. Please reply to changeset discussion, and use descriptive upload comments
1. Don't delete `highway=construction`
2. Don't simply delete `traffic_calming=island` + `area=yes`
Kovoschiz (2026-05-31 08:18:21+00:00): 3. Please connect unconnected roads, not deleting them
kingkingHK (2026-05-31 13:47:57+00:00): Do not upload personal-use changesets. This is vandalism.


https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183449758
Wildsharky (2026-06-02 11:42:17+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:183485204
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:43:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
owq (2026-06-10 02:39:05+00:00): These shops seem to be in the wrong location. They should be at Lentor Modern mall near MRT exit 1. I would move them but it's not just a simple move
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-31 06:41:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13898168809

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
t_ja (2026-05-31 09:36:59+00:00): Ahoj,
je nejaky dovod davat layer=1 na celu dlzku cesty/chodnika?
Priklady:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/605804606
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369165238
Zvycajne sa tag "layer" pouziva s tagmi "bridge=yes" / "tunnel=yes" (co ale nie je tento pripad) a aj to len v nevyhnutnej dlzke krizovania s inym objektom.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
Nakaner-repair (2026-06-09 09:51:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183866122, 183866141, 183866143, 183866127 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by ticki_52 since CS 183039302, see https://c.osm.org/t/144453 for details
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
kingkingHK (2026-05-31 13:48:16+00:00): Do not upload personal-use changesets. This is vandalism.


https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183449758
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-31 07:21:45+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13898168809

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:43:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
kingkingHK (2026-05-31 13:49:10+00:00): Do not upload personal-use changesets. This is vandalism.


https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183449758
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
Andrea Musuruane (2026-05-31 18:26:40+00:00): Ciao. Sei sicuro del numero civico? Perché i numeri pari sono dall'altro lato della strada. Ciao, Andrea
AnonMapper568 (2026-06-01 06:43:24+00:00): Ciao, hai ragione, non me ne ero accorto; a logica dovrebbe essere il tre. Per ora lo tolgo e poi appena posso farò un check sul civico fisicamente per esserne certo.
Grazie mille
AnonMapper568 (2026-06-01 17:12:18+00:00): Ho verificato fisicamente e non sembra esserci nessun numero civico fuori, non so come ci si comporti in questi casi ma io lo lascerei senza a sto punto
Andrea Musuruane (2026-06-02 08:05:59+00:00): Concordo
Tomas_J (2026-05-31 07:28:37+00:00): zdroj je survey - zapomnel jsem uvest
NeatNit (2026-06-01 16:11:29+00:00): Hi!

My script https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gtfs2osm returned the bus stop to where it was due to its rules (< 3m). This caused it to still appear to be exactly on the footpath, though not as an actual node of it.

I tried to tweak the geometry to correct for that: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183507217 , can you verify that it's a match for what's on the ground?
Sanniu (2026-06-02 04:46:38+00:00): Hi
I've moved stop out of way by couple of centimeters as they should be standalone points, no more than that.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
pyrog (2026-05-31 07:30:53+00:00): Pour info : https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=12047627&type=relation&map=18.0/47.5765/-0.364
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
kingkingHK (2026-05-31 13:48:27+00:00): Do not upload personal-use changesets. This is vandalism.


https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183449758
qstep (2026-05-31 09:59:15+00:00): Szia! Javítottam a jelölésen az OSM wiki alapján és megadtam az elérhetőségeket. Fel volt véve egy másik brie nails is a hátsó épületen, feltételezem ott van helyileg a vállalkozásod, mert lentebb csak konténer szerű épületet meg a Fenyőkéreg akármit találtam. Jó így? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10979475676
Bihari Brigitta (2026-05-31 10:26:40+00:00): Szia!
Köszönöm a segítséget és a javítást!
A hátsó pont a valós helyszín, ott működik a vállalkozásom, Bihari Brigi Lábmentő. 
Az utcafronti pont és bármiféle Brie nails nem szükséges. :)
Mégegyszer köszönöm!
Köszönöm!
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:43:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
Sanniu (2026-06-01 07:26:27+00:00): Hi, can address be added not on the street line, but on the right side of it, where the building suppose to be?
kingkingHK (2026-05-31 13:48:41+00:00): Do not upload personal-use changesets. This is vandalism.


https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183449758
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
kartoittaa (2026-05-31 08:31:31+00:00): Lisäksi sillasta on purettu tornille vienyt "uloke". Poistin sillasta nämä pari nodea ja suorakulmaistin silta-alueen.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792