piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SekeRob (2025-08-22 13:12:40+00:00): Hi,

Bad news: ANNCSU has an incompatible license with OSM called  CC-BY 4.0, so you will have to revert the name changes you applied using this resource as base. Same goes for the addresses, to note that the positioning of the addresses is off such as is very visible in Bolignano and Mutignano.

Sorry, but the rule 'ground truth' and 'on the ground' continues to apply for OSM, meaning that if a wall sign in Pescara which says the street is named Via Giuseppe Maltese 6, that's the one we enter as name in OSM and there are more I found u used ANNCSU to base street name changes on. All needs reverting.

Cheers.

Quote "L’ANNCSU ha licenza CC-BY 4.0, non compatibile per l’import su OSM a meno che non ci sia un waiver e per quanto ne so io non mi risulta che ci sia nessun waiver. Motivo in più per fare revert di eventuali dati su OSM importati da ANNCSU (tantopiù se sovrascrivendo i nomi reali rilevati sul campo)."

It also was discussed multiple times on the telegram group such as here https://t.me/c/1124175268/114638
eggie (2025-08-21 15:42:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Ik heb amenity=restaurant ook verwijderd.. Of is dit een restaurant gebleven onder een andere naam?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
max_berg (2025-08-21 19:50:39+00:00): Hi Eggie, I can see signs that it will be a restaurant again. Will keep my eye on it and update when it opens.
eggie (2025-08-21 19:59:43+00:00): Okay Top! 👍
HeiligerHein112 (2025-08-21 15:16:30+00:00): New ways on the ground - not the old ones as seen on google maps!
marczoutendijk (2025-08-21 15:24:13+00:00): I see what you mean, but I only changed the 4-years old situation based on Bing, not on Google.
But using the Hesse DOP20 aerial pictures I see that the whole area needs some redoing!
Do you have the time to do that?
Marc.
HeiligerHein112 (2025-08-21 15:25:53+00:00): I try. Mike
Baloo Uriza (2025-08-21 15:38:46+00:00): Did we get a ski chalet or was this an attempt at mapping a house?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170785599
CampariSoda (2025-08-30 11:18:58+00:00): Hi Baloo, , sorry for late reply.  This is a guest house that is rented and can be found on booking.com.  I just spent a week there.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170785599
stevea (2025-08-21 21:55:08+00:00): Such beautiful mapping; thank you!
SikeMo (2025-08-21 22:51:36+00:00): No problem. Hopefully, I'll finish the rest in the next few days. Look forward to taking my family down there to ride.
HellMap (2025-08-24 16:39:26+00:00): Sveiki,

Latvijā mazciemus OSM apzīmē ar `place=hamlet` (nevis ar `place=village`, kas ir "pilnie" ciemi ar VZD robežām). Es izlaboju. Ņem vērā, ka Wikidata un citi avoti var būt novecojuši/nepareizi. Pilni VZD dati ir pieejami https://data.gov.lv/dati/lv/dataset/varis-atvertie-dati .
StC (2025-09-23 09:20:16+00:00): Hi,

this changeset has broken the order of the route relation (and hence, its continuity). It seems that Vespucci does not actively preserves ordering when editing relations. I'll take care of the fix.
tomhukins (2025-09-07 13:02:53+00:00): Thank you for these helpful improvements to OpenStreetMap.

I note you mention that you used Royal Mail's Web site to discover postcodes.  In future, please try to avoid using copyrighted information when mapping.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Postal_codes_in_the_United_Kingdom lists some sources of postcode information that have licences that make them suitable for inclusion.
joost schouppe (2025-09-04 08:46:20+00:00): You say "futur project", but you added a museum that already exists. Is that really the case?
rskedgell (2025-08-21 23:00:18+00:00): Thanks for spotting that - I should have noticed and fixed it when I updated the bridge signs and restrictions.
Langlaeufer (2025-08-21 17:15:54+00:00): Hallo Cart1082,
meinst du wirklich das Erfassen von "kein Radweg" oder "kein Gehweg" an Zufahrten hat einen Mehrwert? 
Grüße und weiterhin frohes mappen.
Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170789398
BrummsLee (2026-05-26 12:24:16+00:00): Hallo Bert!
Ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, daß es dieses Telefon noch geben und auch noch funktionieren soll! Und warum steht es auf der Grünfläche eines Privatgrundstückes?
Auf Satbildern erkenne ich hier auch nichts, was einem Telefon nahe kommt...
Frans S (2025-10-22 08:30:28+00:00): Buildings are often not correct mapped. Especial the high rise buildings and buildings which shows their sideviews  as well. Check this footage how to map these buildings 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsfUcslLtVc
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing 

Best regards and keep mapping
JanFi (2025-12-02 10:33:32+00:00): Je mag hier wel fietsen. Verandering teruggedraaid.
bxl-forever (2025-08-21 18:45:28+00:00): Hello, TommyEnglish,

Please avoid uploading random items in Norway, Spain and Sweden.

You may not be aware of this but when you upload data to the map, your upload is shown as a "bounding box" that is as large as the location of the various objects in it.  Since it contains unrelated objects in multiple countries, your change covers most of Europe, which will annoy a lot of mappers.

Next time, please make 3 separate changesets for a change like this.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Also, the restaurant you added in Krokek is a duplicate of the one you added a few hours earlier. I removed it.
TommyEnglish (2025-08-21 18:56:00+00:00): Yes i know this is due to my connection to Organic map
TommyEnglish (2025-08-21 18:56:31+00:00): It duplicate some of my add
felipeeugenio (2025-08-22 00:08:14+00:00): Quizás sea redundante nombrar el farmyard y agregar, además, el fundo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170791254
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-21 17:10:52+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12962214686
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12962214736
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12962214733
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423936810
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423936811
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423936812

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Javnik (2025-08-22 22:13:05+00:00): Witaj na OSM!
Dzięki za zaangażowanie. Parę pytań/uwag co do edycji:
1. Równoległa na płd.-zach. od budowanego ronda z Szybką nie jest już przejezdna? Zdaje sobię sprawę, że jest w przebudowie, ale zmieniając tagi na "highway=construction" usuwamy możliwość kierowania tą drogą (4 dni temu był przejazd). Jeśli wciąż da się po niej jeździć, proponuję zmianę surface (podobnie jak zrobiłem to na części ronda - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1419702888).
2. Zaczęła się budowa drogi 13.KD-Z - odchodząca od Równoległej do Opackiego (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423936813)? Masz jakieś informacje, zdjęcia? (again, 4 dni temu nie wyglądało na to żeby cokolwiek się coś tam działo) Jeśli nie, najwięcej co można tam dać to "highway=proposed".
3. Nowobudowane budynki przy Opackiego należałoby oznaczyć "building=construction + construction=apartments", podobnie jak te bliżej Łopuszańskiej.
4. Następnym razem zwróć uwagę przy modyfikacjach dróg, można łatwo skasować nadmiarowy węzeł/przesunąć całą drogę w nieprawidłowe miejsce - z drogi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/968198528 zrobiła się bezsensowna pętla - naprawiłem to już ;)
jptolosa (2025-08-21 23:27:53+00:00): Hola, no me parece buena idea cambiar a place=farm todos los fundos, algunos de ellos pueden ser place=isolated_dwelling, especialmente los más aislados, tal como se describe en la wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=farm
felipeeugenio (2025-08-22 00:07:30+00:00): Todo lo que se ve ahí es el Fundo?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170791536
James2813 (2025-08-22 03:20:34+00:00): Hola, sí.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170791536
Monstrofil (2025-10-09 09:26:53+00:00): Доброго дня

Уточніть будь ласка, яке джерело даних?
felipeeugenio (2025-08-22 00:06:58+00:00): James. No sé si es llegar y cambiar todo por un fundo. Estás seguro de que el fundo no toma el nombre del lugar?

entonces lo que estás haciendo es eliminar el lugar y dejar solo el fundo. Por favor incorpórate al chat en Telegram para conversar estas cosas.

Hiciste otra edición en la que le cambiaste el nombre y la categoría a decenas de puntos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170791792
James2813 (2025-08-22 03:40:12+00:00): Estimado Felipe, muchas gracias por la paciencia con mis ediciones. Las hice en analogía a las otras cosas que veía en el mapa. He visto que mis ediciones generan problemas, y como me veo incapaz de asumir un compromiso mayor, voy a dejar de editar. Pido disculpas por cualquier inconveniente y espero puedan seguir mejorando el mapa. Muy cordialmente,
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170791792
felipeeugenio (2025-08-22 18:18:15+00:00): Hola James.
Siento de verdad que nos digas esto. No es para nada la idea de que dejes de mapear si de verdad te interesa.

Estamos para ayudarte y pasa con todos que necesitan asistencia al principio. TODOS.

Pasa también que hay distintos perfiles de maperos, hay algunos que se meten al chat, rpeguntan todo y van mas lento. Tu estás cometiendo los mismos errores que cometimos todos, lo unico que vas más rápido de lo que podemos transmitirte, por lo que insistimos que entres al chat, pero para nada resultan tus ediciones problemáticas.

Insistimos con que te unas al chat y sigas con tus aportes.

saludos y nos vemos
tux67 (2025-08-22 06:48:58+00:00): Hi Sapphire___

die Mapillary Bilder zeigen ein solches Schild nicht .. sind aber zugegebener Maßen etwas über 1 Jahr alt.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=25597489826561454&focus=photo

Was ist deine Quelle für diesen Change? Hast du leider im Changeset nicht mit angegeben. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170792105
Sapphire___ (2025-08-22 14:55:42+00:00): Hi,

Recently I drove past it on my bicycle. I originally set out a course on Komoot, but I happened to see a Privatweg sign, prompting me not to enter that road.

The road there starts asphalted, but then turns into a landweg that is not paved. That's where the sign is.

The sign is supposed to be left of the building, where the unpaved road starts https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=592415999521714&focus=photo&lat=51.006469399999986&lng=6.120263300000033&z=17

-Sapphire
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-21 17:26:31+00:00): I guess this is #spam and should be reverted?
user_5359 (2025-08-21 17:41:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1098387519. You changed the value of natural from forest to grass. Were all the trees that can still be seen on the aerial photographs felled?
user_5359 (2025-08-23 18:34:13+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/13087282398. What is the mean of
socket:typef = 2
socket:typef:output = 2 kW
(unknown typef)?
l3BAM (2025-08-28 08:14:19+00:00): The source is from https://charge.freshmile.com/location/FRS18112835 (Points de Charge tab).
The type f is specified on https://www.worldstandards.eu/electricity/plugs-and-sockets/f/.
Do you mean that is as a schuko socket? Should I change?
l3BAM (2025-08-28 08:16:50+00:00): Type f is a synonym of Schuko:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schuko
l3BAM (2025-08-28 08:22:49+00:00): After thinking it over, I shall change it to schuko. You are right. Thank you.
Sir Minion (2025-08-22 14:16:42+00:00): Hoe werken belijningen? Er zijn wel haaientanden en een loonstrook waar de twee banen bij elkaar komen. Maar er is een fysieke baan scheiding hier
rhhs (2025-08-21 18:23:32+00:00): Hi, are you sure about the edits you just made? I see that you sometimes changed foot=yes to foot=no in places where afaik there are no traffic signs that forbid pedestrians (i.e. it is legally allowed to walk, though maybe unwise). You changed a sidewalk=separate to sidewalk=right where there is a separately mapped sidewalk on the right side.
SunnyIsland10 (2025-08-22 21:11:49+00:00): Greetings rhhs,

I am attempting to create a safer pedestrian network across Bulgaria by applying foot=no tags where I notice segments are considered unsafe for pedestrian passage. I am attempting to follow similar logic used when adding in foot=no tags similar to this bridge  (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20098815). What do you think about continuing to add foot=no to instances where we do not see any pedestrian friendly segments of road? As for the changes related to sidewalks, I am using more specific tagging (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk:right) when the sidewalk is visible in ground level imagery, as the sidewalk=separate page mentions (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sidewalk%3Dseparate)

Thank you for your reaching out,
SunnyIsland10
Dimitar155 (2025-08-23 07:55:56+00:00): The change to the tunnel under Цариградско is correct. Only rats and cockroaches may want to walk there but we aren't making maps for them.

That part of the ring road (near Boyana / Manastriski livadi) lacks any pedestrian infrastructure. I've seen cars parking on what should be a sidewalk (someday) while other cars are driving 70 km/h in the next lane...

@rhhs it won't be legally allowed for most bridges and tunnels in about two weeks :).

Чл. 114. На пешеходците е забранено:
...
4. (нова - ДВ, бр. 64 от 2025 г., в сила от 07.09.2025 г.) да се движат в тунели и по мостове, когато няма изградени тротоари.

https://lex.bg/laws/ldoc/2134649345
rhhs (2025-08-23 12:20:31+00:00): In OSM, access tags such as foot=no should strictly be applied only where there is a legal restriction. See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/poll-should-streetcomplete-disable-the-are-pedestrians-forbidden-to-walk-on-this-road-without-sidewalk-here-quest-in-the-uk/118387 for an example of a discussion on this subject. So foot=no should only be added where there is either a sign forbidding pedestrians (Bulgarian type В12, see here https://bg.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D1%8A%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8_%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8_%D0%B2_%D0%91%D1%8A%D0%BB%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%8F#%D0%93%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BF%D0%B0_%E2%80%9E%D0%92%E2%80%9C_%E2%80%93_%D0%9F%D1%8A%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8_%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8_%D0%B7%D0%B0_%D0%B2%D1%8A%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%B6%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B5_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%B8_%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%8F%D0%BD%D0%B5_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%B2%D1%8A%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0 ) or because it is mentioned as forbidden in the traffic law. Thanks Dimitar for mentioning the new rule in the traffic law! Afaik in the Bulgarian traffic law, pedestrians are forbidden only on motorways, and now in tunnels and on bridges without sidewalk.
A properly designed router should know the legal restrictions (so should not route pedestrians over motorways and bridges/tunnels without sidewalk) and otherwise should set its own rules that help pedestrians choose safe routes for instance by strongly discourage routing via major (high-class) roads and road links without sidewalks. This is the router's job, and not our job as mappers. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_router
rhhs (2025-08-23 13:29:09+00:00): About sidewalk=separate, it is indeed ambiguous, but I think the right tag to replace it with is sidewalk:right=separate

Mitko, I added a pavement/bus platform here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1424401897 Can you check my work and finish it?
SunnyIsland10 (2025-08-25 22:34:55+00:00): Greetings Dimitar155 and rhhs,

Thank you both for the information and resources regarding the laws and pedestrian traffic signs in Bulgaria. I will now only apply foot=no tags when prohibited road signs are present. 

Have a great day,
SunnyIsland10
rhhs (2025-08-26 10:50:09+00:00): Thanks! Will you also have a look again at your previous edits and check if there's a legal reason to add foot=yes/no?
SunnyIsland10 (2025-08-26 22:01:29+00:00): Greetings rhhs,

I will review my previous edits to check for signage.

Thanks!
SunnyIsland10
dilidilip (2025-09-08 08:29:03+00:00): 贵人阁周边道路类型错误 已经一条通往虎跑景区的道路轨迹有误
TooM (2025-09-15 16:29:58+00:00): 您好，感谢您的反馈。我想您已经帮我纠正了错误。我看您为杭州做出了很多贡献，太棒了，真了不起！我每年会定期去中国一次，所以不是特别活跃的贡献者。期待有机会在当地与您相遇！
Grass-snake (2025-08-22 18:22:36+00:00): Здравствуйте, уточните пожалуйста, это "5-я поляна" или 6?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423942224
dypa (2025-09-05 06:31:01+00:00): При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra

Пожалуйста при внесении следующих правок используйте теги (Размеченный (нерегулируемый) пешеходный переход)
crossing=uncontrolled
crossing:markings=zebra

Заранее спасибо!
Patchi (2025-09-07 15:25:21+00:00): Hello IIVQ,

The switch for the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/698922430 from highway=track to highway=footway is a little bit suspicious. This way is quite large. More over I have some doubt that this is an exclusive way for pedestrian (basic definition of the highway=footway).
Are the ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423942398 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1234133593 more something like highway=path + bicycle=designated or at least bicycle=yes?

If you want to indicate a MTB route it will be probably better to add a MTB route relation more than putting all MTB tags on the way itself. The attributes piste:*=* are only for skiing. Take a look as example to the bike park in Serre-Chevalier (example https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9228387).

Best regards, 

Patchi
IIVQ (2025-09-10 10:56:16+00:00): Hi,

You are right about  osm.org/way/698922430, that is a track! I reversed it back into a track.

Als for the 
 osm.org/way/698922430
osm.org/way/1234133593, they are ski pistes that are in summer also possible to be walked upon, so I added highway=path. They are wide enough for a tractor, but not prepared for that, and also not prepared for MTB or (normal) cycles, as they are quite steep, but any MTB cyclist could do this route.

For the mountain bike routes here (see https://lequeyras.com/app/uploads/guillestrois-queyras/2025/07/Depliant-bike-park-2025-VF.pdf) , it's a bit complex, there is the "Bike Park" with the four routes, I tried to put them on the map, but I don't know the exact trajectory of the black D4.
Then there is also the bigger VTT de Montagne routes 51-55 (see page 2) but I didn't put those in yet.

Greetings, IIVQ
IIVQ (2025-09-10 11:47:41+00:00): I have added the 5 randonnée routes, but could you check on the mtb:type (as the values are not properly described on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:type ) and other things on those routes? There is also some trajectory missing southeast of Valpreveyre of the route 55 (Grand tour de Gilly).

The routes are:
51 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19586576#map=15/44.80290/6.93779
52 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19586577
53 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19586578
54 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19586580
55 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19586579

Regards, IIVQ
Patchi (2025-09-10 19:59:26+00:00): Hello IIVQ,

Great work and thank you for your help. As the downhill park seems to be exclusively for bicycles I add a foot=no on all ways in the area, except for some segments visible on the map page 1 you mentioned and that are consistent with the hike relations in this area.

I also add the D4 relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19588074) based on the GPX trace found on the bike park website and the strava bicycle heatmap. Check it if is OK for you. If yes then the note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4922621 can be closed I think.

For the other MTB relations it is not very clear. I give you that! The MTB type is probably mtb:type=allmountain as seen on the page 2 of the plan ("Itinéraires All-Mountain"). But I don't think it is a huge problem if there is no type at all for these relations.

Best regards,

Patchi.
IIVQ (2025-09-12 12:32:48+00:00): Hello, thank you!
I have added mtb:type=allmountain to the 5 "crosscountry" and =downhill to the 4 in the bike park. 
There is one path that is accessible on foot in the bike park, it snakes a bit around the bike track. I uploaded it as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429227131#map=17/44.789825/6.944162

I think it is a bit weird the bike park tracks are now rendered as a "bicicle path" on OSM Carto, but that's a fault of OSM Carto, on OSMAND they still show as a path (black dashes) while a proper bike path is blue long dashes...
Patchi (2025-09-12 15:14:19+00:00): Hello IIVQ,

Looks good for me!

Thank you and best regards,

Patchi.
IIVQ (2025-09-29 15:18:50+00:00): Thx for the cooperation!
user_5359 (2025-08-22 06:25:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition!
Please don't any standard name ("House") to the objekts.
mavl (2025-08-22 14:40:03+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста, проверьте ваш процесс добавления данных. Вы добавляете два здания в одно и то же место. Например:  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423944455  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423944300
Danil Moiseenko (2025-08-22 14:56:06+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Вот ссылка на пакет правок, где были удалены соответствующие дубликаты: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170836580
Похоже при сохранении одного из пакета правок произошёл глюк, из-за чего продублировались уже добавленные данные.
mavl (2025-08-22 15:00:46+00:00): Спасибо.
buy_osmand (2025-08-22 07:45:16+00:00): I, buy_osmand, do hereby verify that way/1423944430 that has been created by wjfarnell's hands ✍ is indeed `landuse=grass`
😳👍 Good,
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170793645
user_5359 (2025-08-22 06:21:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/3835204410  (address) more than 100 meters. Please check this!
Pikse (2025-09-22 11:31:04+00:00): This road is adjacent to Puhangu tänav but is not part of the adjacent road, see https://xgis.maaamet.ee/adsavalik/LP00017130

As per official address data this road has no name.
Comino (2025-08-22 11:21:01+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin
NittyGrittyInTheCity (2025-08-21 18:35:48+00:00): Correction: the source used was MGP Pro 2025.07.23
Martin Ortuta (2025-08-21 18:46:07+00:00): Ok, vďaka za upozornenie. Budem si na to dávať pozor.
bartgron (2025-08-21 22:14:53+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Rp19 (2025-08-21 19:05:55+00:00): Also removed the closed Bank of Scotland
user_5359 (2025-08-23 07:08:00+00:00): Hallo! Bitte schau Dir nochmal https://www.osm.org/way/24204378 an. Was ist die Bedeutung von dem Tag bparking:b = n ? Meinst Du eventuell parking:both = no ?
fmc_5 (2025-08-23 13:26:42+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe es gerade korrigiert.