piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
donovaly (2024-12-30 00:10:56+00:00): > I only connected unconnected ways to newly created constructions

But you did not check that these additions were real. The user you mentioned is a vandal, he changed administrative boundaries, even the position of Tirana's main river.
Please only add things you are sure they exist.
(For what you added there is not even a tender procedure started:)
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:54:41+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164660151
JesseFTW (2024-12-28 03:17:54+00:00): I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since this changeset is very far from any others you have made, and you didn't make any other changesets near it.

StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:29:20+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801774
JesseFTW (2024-12-28 03:18:09+00:00): I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since this changeset is very far from any others you have made, and you didn't make any other changesets near it.

StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been.
eggie (2024-12-28 13:24:02+00:00): Merged info with addressnode Bospaviljoen Turfveld
Greetz,
eggie
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:27:40+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801748
angys (2024-12-27 06:10:19+00:00): Hii, is source:name  instead of source_name
angys (2024-12-27 06:11:18+00:00): Please see this
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Wdm
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-18 09:53:08+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12455080787/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
JesseFTW (2024-12-28 03:26:26+00:00): I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since you made this changeset a few hours apart from a changeset thousands of miles away. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160660662

StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been.
mueschel (2024-12-28 12:58:15+00:00): I reverted this changeset. The reason is as usual: Automatic replacement of documented tags with undocumented ones.
Evgeniya_rocketdata (2024-12-30 06:29:08+00:00): Hello! Thank you for your comment. We've figured out what the problem is, we won't fix it anymore.
TiziBienvenus (2025-01-10 10:40:43+00:00): Hi
Arnold Nkwabong (2025-01-10 13:08:45+00:00): Hi
b-jazz (2024-12-27 07:25:55+00:00): High desert golf must be something wild.
bxl-forever (2024-12-27 12:06:43+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for the various updates here.

One important thing: if "shrubbery" is more appropriate, you should not change its category solely to have it appear on some given renderer (in particular osm-carto, which is the default view on osm.org).

natural=shrubbery is rendered on other maps using OSM data.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
spaarkaart (2024-12-27 12:13:01+00:00): Thank you for your comment. 

I'm aware of the discussion around shrubbery and significant usage in the Netherlands. 

I opted for scrub because that's what I also found in other parks in BXL. But I agree with you that shrubbery is better. Will update it accordingly.
JesseFTW (2025-01-01 23:15:12+00:00): Please try to avoid large changeset bounding boxes like this. It helps others in tracking changes. You can see more details about this in the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset
sanddune (2025-04-07 09:23:11+00:00): Why was pedestrian access changed to "no"? This is a public fire trail accessible by foot and bicycle. I've reverted this change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164624082 .
mavl (2025-05-13 15:08:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
SomeoneElse2 (2025-04-15 23:32:37+00:00): Hello,
Lots of the houses in this changeset are "building=semidetached_house100752" - I suspect that is a typo?
Regards,
Andy
ruph (2025-04-16 07:39:00+00:00): Thank you very much for the hint. Yes, that is definitely a typo. How can I quickly and easily find the corresponding objects?
SomeoneElse (2025-04-16 13:21:59+00:00): I was just looking at the rare values at https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/europe:britain-and-ireland/keys/building#values .

For example, for semidetached_house100752, a regular worldwide overpass query https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/22pe will work - you can zoom in and review the data and, if a simple "replace the value with something else" makes sense (as it does here) you can use that same query for input to Josm.
ruph (2025-04-18 09:18:20+00:00): Through the overpass query the objects were quickly identified. Thank you again for the helpful hint and the useful tips.
Grass-snake (2024-12-27 21:18:41+00:00): Подскажите, а Вы уверены в этом названии улиц? Не могу найти улицу с таким названием в Ртищево.
真中あお (2024-12-27 10:00:22+00:00): 大佬好，感谢您一直以来对osm的贡献。不过，我冒昧地建议一下：最好不要在iD编辑器使用天地图的自定义图层。
这是因为iD编辑器在上传时会自动在变更集记录使用过的图层，包括您带有个人密钥的天地图网址。这样，一方面，osm管理员可能会因为版权存疑撤销您的编辑；另一方面密钥泄露，其他人可以使用您的天地图额度。
想要使自定义图层而不自动写入变更集，可以安装和使用josm编辑器。另外方便的话也欢迎您加入qq群290278518，和更多编辑者交流~
真川　はな (2025-01-06 02:52:38+00:00): 建议收到，之后尽量在josm中使用
kmpoppe (2025-01-27 06:13:11+00:00): Hallo Stefan,

du gibst in diesem Changeset die Quelle mit "Google" an. Generell ist dies NICHT zulässig, da Google copyright-geschütztes Material bereitstellt, das nicht mit der Open Database License von OpenStreeetMap kompatibel ist.

Falls du die Information, dass hier kein Fußweg existiert, tatsächlich von Google Maps nachgezeichnet hast (und nicht von Bing oder ESRI, was mit den Bildern im iD Editor eigentlich möglich gewesen sein müsste), muss ich deine Änderung rückgängig und unsichtbar machen.

Bitte kurze Info hierzu.

Vielen Dank.

Gruß

Kai
OSMF DataWorkingGroup (DWG)
kmpoppe (2025-01-27 06:14:08+00:00): DWG Ticket#2025012710000169
Stefan Mewes (2025-01-29 08:44:03+00:00): Hallo, das mit der Quelle ist mir nicht bekannt gewesen. Sorry, ich bin ortskundig, sonst nimmt die Änderung bitte zurück. Soweit ich mich erinnere, ist dort nur ein Sandweg.
kmpoppe (2025-01-29 09:09:35+00:00): Hallo Stefan,

alles klar. Ich kann das auf den für OSM freigegebenen Bildern deutlich sehen, dass das ein Weg ohne jeglichen Fußweg ist und wenn du "local knowledge" hast (was auch eine gültige Quelle ist, besser ist natürlich "survey", also "hab ich mich vor Ort von überzeugt"), dann passt das so und ich mache den Vorgang zu.

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag zu OpenStreetMap und auf viele weitere!

Happy mapping.

Kai
OSMF DataWorkingGroup (DWG)
jjyach (2024-12-27 18:17:40+00:00): If you have concerns of recent edits please comment on them not just "fix" things to incorrect/inconsistent with standards across the map.  Thank you.
GarliccBread1 (2024-12-28 05:38:21+00:00): I understand your concerns, but I am fixing these to correct standards and the most up to date knowledge, not incorrect whatsoever, those paths to the detention ponds only existed during construction of the new science center a year ago, and they no longer exist now, if anything they are at most a track/land access road, not everything needs to be mapped. A road that would maybe driven by one vehicle/cart a year like the tracks near the detention pound, plus the roads don’t even have a driveway apron, serves as a low volume land access road, not a general service road which is used for access to residential houses, buildings, parking lots, and more high traffic applications. This is the specific created use for a track/land access road. And the service road in front of the SIC center, if you live near here or have driven here you would know that the road was re-striped from its original one way configuration to be two ways last summer as the school found the one way to be inefficient during the 2023-24 school year. The bing aerials are outdated, and they should not be used to revert others edits as a source of evidence, and then proceed to calm them “Low quality”. These edits are not low quality at all. Many of the pedestrian paths were disconnected from roads too, so there would be no point in them being mapped if they are not connected to anything, as they aren’t routing efficiently. I am just fixing errors I am finding to be correct and up to standards
jjyach (2024-12-28 06:02:55+00:00): All across the map service roads are placed into these drainage basins as they are for service access and have improvements over say a dirt track which is what track is supposed to be used for out in forests or other rural areas with no improvement.  Data like this is critical for other entities that use the map data say for emergency access or just internal use. Just cause something isn't frequently used doesn't mean it shouldn't exist on here.  Giving other groups the best available data is critical  and dirt tracks are about the lowest category of a way.  I use many sources of imagery which are newer than bings data and my apologies but none showed that change. Even many of the schools active maps depict it being one way.  If you see errors in edits the community expects you to comments and let the user have a chance to fix that error themselves unless it shows in QA as a critical error
SomeoneElse (2024-12-31 13:10:12+00:00): If there's a difference of opinion here, perhaps mention it at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/us/78 and see what other people have to say?
Best Regards,
Andy (from the DWG)
ZioDragon (2025-01-08 08:40:56+00:00): Cao tốc Vành đai 4 chưa khởi công, đề nghị không đổi thành construction vì còn nhiều thay đổi trong QH
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-27 10:18:49+00:00): Hi ndeboeuf, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason why you changed the the boundary of Archipel des Tuamotu? Thanks.
ndeboeuf (2025-01-03 08:29:32+00:00): because some islands are not in the land area
goedegazelle (2024-12-28 11:47:59+00:00): De chalets op de camping De Koerberg die nu zijn verwijderd had ik onlangs toegevoegd, inclusief het aantal bedden:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/52.408814/6.045951

Is er een manier om er voor te zorgen dat deze gebouwen niet opnieuw door een BAG-import worden verwijderd als ik hen weer heb toegevoegd?
CartoKees (2024-12-28 15:13:26+00:00): Hallo goedegazelle,
met  changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160717050 heb ik de chalets teruggezet. En gezorgd dat de BAG-import ze niet meer "ziet".
De BAG-import kijkt voor panden naar ref:bag. Komt het id voor in de BAG als gesloopt dan is dat een trigger (om te kijken) om het te verwijderen. Wil je toch een bepaald gebouw behouden in OSM, omdat het er wel is, maar niet in de BAG voorkomt? Dan is zorgen dat de ref:bag tag weg is voldoende. 
Dat kan op 2 manieren. 1. De tag aanpassen naar ref:bag:old of 2. alles wat met de BAG te maken had weghalen.
Mijn persoonlijke voorkeur heeft de tweede, anders blijven allerlei tags nog jaren staan in OSM zonder dat ze nog echt iets toevoegen. De BAG gegevens zijn ook nog te zien in de historie van het gebouw.

Met vriendelijke groet,

CartoKees
Andrea Musuruane (2024-12-27 13:05:16+00:00): Ciao. Grazie la modifica sulla NSA12. Solo un appunto. Non è horse=no ma carriage=no (divieto di transito ai veicoli a trazione animale). Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160667177
Gabri81 (2024-12-27 13:42:03+00:00): Grazie mille per l'aiuto come sempre. Ho provveduto a modificare da Horse a Carriage in tutti i nodi. Ho anche modificato l'errore che avevo commesso sulla strada vicino a Vigliano. Grazie ancora!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160667177
eggie (2024-12-27 09:33:52+00:00): revertd by changeset #160667551

Please reply at question from the former mapper.

Don't change roadnumbers from edits of experienced mappers.
Greetz,
eggie
Glassman (2024-12-29 01:12:22+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160667522
Andrea Musuruane (2024-12-27 13:09:08+00:00): Ciao. Credo che in questa way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/712263716 ci sia un errore: bicycle=yes + foot=yes + horse=yes. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160667564
Andrea Musuruane (2024-12-27 13:11:11+00:00): Inoltre sulle secondary non è necessario specificare bicycle=yes + foot=yes + horse=yes. E' già il default. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160667564
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-27 09:51:03+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8449202302
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148449663

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Jordi MF (2024-12-27 19:03:17+00:00): Hola Fercando,

¿Por qué has eliminado todo el área etiqeutada como "farmland"? Aunque no parece que sea una zona de siemba de cereales, sí que lo es de árboles, por lo que no debería de haberse eliminado, sino cambiado a landuse=orchard.

Si no tienes ningún incoveniente, lo recuperaré y modificaré.

Saludos
literan (2024-12-29 13:24:39+00:00): не надо дублировать теги. Здесь и так уже стоит тег access=private, что означает приватный доступ для всех вообще.

откачу вашу правку
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
HirschKauz (2024-12-27 12:55:57+00:00): HI! 
Elemente bitte nach Möglichkeit NICHT löschen und was Neues mappen, sondern einen Punkt stehen lassen und dem dann die entsprechenden Tags geben. Warum? OSM liebt es wenn die History erhalten bleibt :-) 

PS, 
ein Kasten wo man reingehen kann ist meist buiding=service https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building#Energieversorgung_/_Technische_Geb%C3%A4ude 
ein kleiner wo nur Technik drin ist ist ein street_cabinet https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dstreet_cabinet 
Grüße und weiter viel Spaß
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160668930
Welterforscher25 (2024-12-27 14:14:26+00:00): Moin, die vorherige Darstellung war inkorrekt. Es existiert dort lediglich eine street cabinet.

Beste Grüße
Stian Cristian (2025-02-09 20:58:22+00:00): Pentru ce ai simtit tu nevoia sa stergi statiile si sa faci liniile de autobuz inoperabile?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-27 10:40:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56384665

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-12-27 12:44:02+00:00): Poprawione
pippo6 (2025-02-18 13:52:12+00:00): Grazie, avevo scordato di aggiornare l'ASL  fine covid

1) emergency=yes significa che c'è il pronto soccorso, che questi due non hanno

2) not:operator:wikidata dovrebbe essere operator:wikidata, no?
hlfan (2025-01-13 15:31:04+00:00): Ist dir bewusst, dass es nicht die Mühe wert war, die Oberleitungsmasten jetzt nach dem Stand von 2023 einzutragen, weil im Zuge der Restrukturierung vom Nordkopf vom Praterstern viele Masten versetzt wurden und werden?
Erik - (2025-01-22 13:26:10+00:00): Auch hier sollte man den Änderungssatz neutral schreiben. Solche Wörter wie: "Dummheit", usw. und der letzte Satz gehören nicht auf OSM, da sie gegen die Richtlinien verstoßen und zudem abwertend sind.
angys (2024-12-27 20:58:51+00:00): Hii, based on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bus_routes_in_Klang_Valley
The service provider, for most of the feeder bus under "rapidkl" brand, should be operator=Rapid Bus instead of Rapid kl
Yog Sot (2024-12-29 19:12:51+00:00): jak mieszkasz i bywasz, to nie rób błędów podczas edycji przyklejając losowe ogrodzenia 200 metrów dalej. 
Wszystkie twoje zmiany prawie zostały skasowane, bo nie uważałeś. Uważaj nastepnym razem.
somehundred (2024-12-27 12:07:25+00:00): Apskatoties taginfo secinu, ka "location" birka pārsvarā netiek izmantota kopā ar "man_made=gantry". Pārsvarā tiek izmantots "layer". Turklāt "gantry" pēc definīcijas atrodas virs ceļa tāpēc "location=overhead" man šķiet lieks.

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/man_made=gantry#combinations
HellMap (2024-12-27 12:55:48+00:00): > "gantry" pēc definīcijas atrodas virs ceļa

Tur jau tā problēma, ka tā būtu loģiski, bet wiki lapa prasa lietot `layer` virs ceļa un taginfo pusei ir `layer` klāt (un tiem, kam nav, visticamāk nav vienkārši to wiki lapu skatījušies).

`location` gan ir standarta tegs - to var lietot principā visdažādākiem elementiem. Katrā lapā tas nebūs aprakstīts. Nezinu, vai `gantry` kaut kāds speciāls izņēmums tam vai nē.

Es pārliku uz tikai `layer`.

Es negribēju personīgi likt tikai `layer`, jo var sanākt pastulbs gadījums, ja zem tilta ceļam in gantry un tad tilts ir jāliek ar vēl lielāku layer. Tas gan drīzāk teorētisks gadījums. Es tā pa ātro nezinu nevienu tādu vietu.
somehundred (2024-12-27 13:12:02+00:00): Wiki lapa arī nav perfekta. Visi, kuri liek "layer" visticamāk ir apskatījušies wiki lapu, kur tas rakstīts. 

Izdomāju, ka standartam vajadzētu būt šādam:

1. Uz vienkārša ceļa, kas nav tilts, nelikt "man_made=gantry" klāt "layer", jo pēc definīcijas tas atrodas virs ceļa. Teorētiskā
situācijā, kur "man_made=gantry" atrodas klāt pie zemes tajā pašā slānī, varētu klāt likt "location=overground".
2. Ja ceļš ir tilts un tam ir klāt "layer", tad arī "man_made=gantry" jāliek klāt tādu pašu "layer". Piemēram, ja uz ceļa ir
"layer=1", tad arī "man_made=gantry" jāliek klāt "layer=1".

Situāciju, kuru tu attainoji, varētu atrisināt ar šādu metodi. Augstākajam tiltam un jebkādiem "man_made=gantry", kas uz tā atrodas, būtu jāliek klāt "layer=2".

Ja esi ar mieru, ka šādi var tagot, tad wiki lapu arī vajadzētu palabot.
HellMap (2024-12-27 13:49:33+00:00): Es tev piekrītu un tā būtu loģiski. (Līdzīgi kā strāvas vadi.) Wiki lapā `layer` ir minēts kopš https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:man_made%3Dgantry&diff=2249049&oldid=2206143 . Oriģinālajā proposal'ā tā nebija https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Gantry . Tā kā puse gantry pasaulē ir ar layer 1+, tad tā gluži nomainīt wiki lapu uz vienu vai otru variantu nevajadzētu. Bet varētu pagaidām pieminēt, ka prakse ir 50/50 un nav skaidrs no kurienes tas izdomāts. (Tāpēc es arī liku `layer=#` + `location=overhead` kā kompromisu (un tagad `layer=#+1` lai skaidrs neatkarīgi no pieņēmumiem, ja `location` nevēlams)). Vajadzētu uzprasīt wiki izmaiņas autoram no kurienes `layer` šķiet pareizā prakse. Minēts vēl piemēram te https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/man-made-gantry/123397 un pāris citos topikos īsumā. Zinot OSM apspriežu vēsturi, te visticamāk paliks pie vajadzības `layer=1`, jo "Vācijā tā liek". ;) Bet tad vajag forumā tēmu...
IvanBabić (2024-12-28 17:03:15+00:00): Reverted because unnecessary node was made #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160722131
gscholz (2024-12-28 10:41:49+00:00): Hi Moritz_en_bici,
your recent changesets have added errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=2.36579&lat=41.63894&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160673261

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Moritz_en_bici (2024-12-31 15:54:24+00:00): Hi gscholz,
Thank you for the feedback. I am new and made some mistakes.

I did two new edits, where I think I managed to add the changes I wanted without creating duplicated ways.

If possible, please let me know if you notice anything amiss.

Moritz
IvanBabić (2024-12-28 17:31:14+00:00): Reverted because unnecessary node was made #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160723107
mavl (2025-02-05 14:03:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162167075 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: wrong values for name:en - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161608012].
BCNorwich (2025-06-13 04:52:27+00:00): Hi, You added Way: 1346617739 but forgot to tag it. Could you please apply a tag?

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2025-06-17 04:45:10+00:00): No response so tahgged as grass and amend relation
onovy (2024-12-27 19:53:17+00:00): Ahoj,

pročti si prosím dokumentaci:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Elektrick%C3%A1_veden%C3%AD

Opravil jsem několik chybek.

Díky.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-07 23:47:32+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164656046
Tjuro (2024-12-27 22:16:36+00:00): reverted because of street complete vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160694951
Melrok (2024-12-28 20:52:00+00:00): Sorry, what did I do wrong ?
silversurfer83 (2024-12-27 19:12:42+00:00): Moin

Adressen in Bayern ohne Quellenangabe. Sag doch mal bitte an, woher du die Hausnummern hast
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160676071
silversurfer83 (2024-12-28 13:10:46+00:00): Und?
lberges (2024-12-28 13:15:50+00:00): Mach doch erstmal das Silo rein, das habe ich für Dich übrig gelassen.
PinguDEV (2025-01-22 14:37:03+00:00): Und?
silversurfer83 (2025-01-22 14:50:49+00:00): @PinguDEV
Ich glaub da kommt nix mehr. Abgesehen davon wandert das Allermeiste der letzte paar Jahre voraussichtlich demnächst durch den reverter.

Eigentlich sehr schade, dass ein fleißiger mapper nicht erklären kann, woher seine Daten kommen