piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Joseph R P (2025-07-27 20:46:40+00:00): "Major population center" is completely relative to the region. Ely is large enough in a massively empty region that it appears as a control city in places as far away as Las Vegas and shows up on maps and globes on-par with cities like Reno. Closer to another city, this is nothing, but this is the middle of nowhere in Nevada where this is about as large and prominent as you can get. I would say the same about Delta as well, which is less remote, but still a major place along this route.

I am open to starting a discussion thread on the Forum or Slack, and welcome Flap Slimy Outward (who creates this changeset and has also contributed to this discussion here) if they would like to participate.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-07-28 14:11:10+00:00): That sounds like a good idea. I guess this is what happens when the "community" of a particular state only has a few people living in it xD
Also, unrelated, but this is the second time I've been invited to a discussion on an OSM forum.
Joseph R P (2025-07-28 22:35:08+00:00): I started a thread for this topic on the forum here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/133312
Joseph R P (2025-07-18 18:33:01+00:00): While US 50 being trunk is a little more justifiable, granted that its much busier these days than its reign as the "Loneliest Road in America", and links some regionally significant places like Fallon, Ely, and Delta, UT (with even more major highways and cities located west/east of this stretch), I would probably leave US 6 at primary, since it sees even much less traffic than 50 and connects even less population centers and major highways directly. It is a cross country route, but is very rarely used for such. In fact, it is notoriously a relatively pointless US highway for much of its route (aside from places like New England or between I 15 and I 70 in Utah) given that most of the parts that do directly connect major population centers have been successfully bypassed by Interstates, and segments that aren't bypassed usually only link smaller communities and are very lightly traveled, such as the case with it in Nevada. For example, US 6 barely sees about 200-300 vehicles along a stretch like the route between Tonopah and Route 318 because of its isolation and connections only with Ely and Tonopah, the latter of which is an even smaller community.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-07-19 04:44:46+00:00): Okay, I'll go change them back.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-07-19 04:48:34+00:00): Remind me: Which parts of US 6 should remain trunk, and which ones should be reverted to primary again?
Joseph R P (2025-07-19 15:05:05+00:00): US 6 should most likely remain primary in Nevada for its lower connectivity and usage by traffic, except for the section between 318 and Ely, and the segments concurrent with US 95 west of Tonopah and 50/93 east of Ely. 

I'd also say the same for the US 93 section upgraded to trunk between Crystal Springs and Majors Place junctions—it's a very comparatively low-traffic route only linking smaller towns, and most traffic travelling between Las Vegas and Ely will use 318 over the less-direct route via Caliente, Panaca, and Pioche.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-07-19 18:56:45+00:00): Okay, I will downgrade them accordingly. Thanks once again!
Taya_S (2025-07-18 05:36:00+00:00): Hello BholeKiBhasam,

What you're mapping as natural=ridge here aren't actually ridges. Just the edges of the lakebed. These are simply intermittent bodies of water.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder
BholeKiBhasam (2025-07-19 05:02:21+00:00): g'day,,,...thank you for the feedback and correction...it has been updated
aweech (2025-10-09 15:56:14+00:00): Hi, your imagery is several years out of date. Please remember to check more recent data.
skumarchandela_lyft (2025-10-10 13:57:30+00:00): Hi Aweech!
My name is Sumit, and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft and Lalit’s Teammate. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Yes, you are right, in this case Lyft-owned aerial imagery is outdated. I apologize for the incorrect edits and not verifying the dates of all the backgrounds before making changes.
Thank you once again for correcting my mistake and for your contribution to OSM.

 Best regards,
 Sumit
ADAC Touristische InfoSysteme (2025-07-26 18:11:06+00:00): You changed Cuba to plae=archipelago, that`s wrong. I changed back to place=country
Yibril Massip (2025-07-26 21:46:05+00:00): Cuba is an archipelago.
Comino (2025-07-18 08:19:01+00:00): Hi COPPYJKP,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#legacy-tags
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin
okadatsuneo (2025-07-18 04:11:34+00:00): Wrong comment.
The correct comment is "delete node".
nevw (2025-07-18 04:54:42+00:00): Hi, is the address for this building 6 Aston Street?
monhiko (2025-07-18 05:52:02+00:00): 这么大一栋建筑物是供电局还是商业中心啊（悲
ShiauPa (2025-07-18 12:02:31+00:00): 供电局的范围而已（）
可能要改成居住区，等我用街景看看👀
مرکز مشاوره روانشناسی آرنیکا( دکتر آرزو نجیب زادگان) (2025-07-18 18:44:14+00:00): Hi, thanks for reviewing the changes.

The "Dr. Arezou Najibzadegan Psychology Center" is an officially licensed mental health clinic, currently active in Mashhad. It operates under formal authorization from both the Iranian Psychological System Organization and the Khorasan Razavi Welfare Organization.

For further information and verification, the center's website is: www.arnikacenter.vom and they can be contacted directly at: +98 937 406 6884.

I’d be glad to provide additional documentation if needed. Thank you again for your attention and support.
NeisReview (2025-07-19 05:51:08+00:00): 👍 Thank you for your map updates.
user_5359 (2025-07-19 10:46:20+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1415583075. What is the mean of the tags
AREA = 1291.731794996
PERIM = 246.40299007292
appcount = 109
building = apartments
building:levels = 6
cadbuild = 1
cadimm = 103
cadnum = 10135.2562.103.1
cadreg = 2562
ekatte = 10135
ekattefn = гр. Варна
flrcount = 5
funccode = 110
functype = Жилищна сграда - многофамилна
immaddr = гр. Варна, район Приморски, п.к. 9000, Чайка №19, бл. 19
propcode = 5
proptype = Частна
regname = район Приморски
strename = Чайка
strnum = 19
validate = РД-18-92/14.10.2008 г., издадена от ИЗПЪЛНИТЕЛЕН ДИРЕКТОР НА АГКК
?
plamen (2025-07-19 11:08:33+00:00): Removed
NeisBot (2025-07-18 05:48:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-23 07:18:50+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/169327150
NeisBot (2025-07-18 05:57:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-20 05:35:27+00:00): Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169093261
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-23 07:19:34+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/169327172
zstadler (2025-07-22 16:08:41+00:00): Hello Rawaz,

Thank you for your contributions to OSM.

In this edit you have modified
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/968697169
and as a result, 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13035771
is no longer a valid closed multipolygon.

Could you fix that?
fabian_i (2025-07-30 06:46:44+00:00): Hi SimonPoole
Ich habe alle sieben Abfallsammelstellen vor Ort und gemäss den Angaben von Stadt Dietikon (https://www.dietikon.ch/abfallorte) geprüft und aktualisiert. Soll ich die anderen sechs Abfallsammelstellen entsprechend auch korrigieren (Name > Beschreibung)?
SimonPoole (2025-07-30 07:04:01+00:00): Generell sollten nur 'echte' Namen ins name tag, also ich würde sagen pass die anderen auch an.

Gruss

Simon
dpolovinkin (2025-10-27 11:13:23+00:00): hi, did you added duplicating points here? can you recheck pls :)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13008519499
Lucinux85500 (2025-10-28 08:48:04+00:00): Thank you, it's been corrected.
Bill Gobie (2025-07-18 06:22:16+00:00): The mapped jog to the west and back on Naden  no longer exists. I am unsure how to remove it...apologies.
jmapb (2025-08-10 06:46:55+00:00): Hello PedestrianMapping_HopMapper, I've partially reverted this changeset (as well as 169050380, 168908129, 168906355, 168906228, 168905595, and 168905269) with changeset 170228832 due to some strange changes of sidewalk geometry and incorrect modification of surface tags. I tried to leave the correct changes intact.

I understand this is part of an organized editing project by Meta. I've reviewed https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/869 https://maproulette.org/challenge/51162/task/294635175 and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Meta/Pedestrian_Mapping but can't quite make out what's going on here. I'd love to know:
 - Why are these challenges being created in particular spots (what's a "complex intersection"?)
 - What observations will trigger a change, and what are the recommended changes?
 - What are the procedures for task validation?

Thanks, jmapb
PedestrianMapping_TraceHop (2025-08-11 06:10:59+00:00): 
Hi jmapb,
 
Thanks so much for your helpful feedback and for partially revert changeset 170228832 while keeping the correct edits. I really appreciate that.
 
Just to clarify ,I am not adding or changing any surface tags, but in this case, the original surface tag was accidentally dropped during the way split for aligning as per the imagery. I’ll be more careful with that in the future and make sure to double-check surface tag consistency and avoid alignment such cases in any upcoming edits.
 
Thanks again, PedestrianMapping_TraceHop
aharvey (2025-07-18 07:07:52+00:00): discussion ongoing at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168924094
Caramell (2025-07-18 06:25:12+00:00): La fonte è da rilevamento, ho dimenticato di modificare il tag "source" prima di caricare...
fortera_au (2025-08-01 23:47:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
fortera_au (2025-08-01 23:47:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
Gregory Peony (2025-07-20 20:52:41+00:00): The residential area here should have been modified to include buildings to the West. Place points should be either placed centrally within a settlement to make it obvious which settlements they represent.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169091773
Joseph R P (2025-07-18 18:04:04+00:00): Thank you for this road class change! This is one I have been planning to make myself for your exact reasons but never got around to doing.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-07-18 21:18:00+00:00): You're welcome! I've been hesitating for a bit since its traffic volumes are a little low compared to other primary routes. But, like you mentioned on 5th Street and Lake Mead Blvd, a newly-built neighborhood won't receive much traffic anyway, and a road with relatively few AADT can still be classified as primary if it's the major throughfare of the area. Since you upgraded Fort Apache, I figured it was time. (Hualapai, with a similar AADT for the sections I could find, has no direct freeway connection and doesn't connect to as many amenities.)
Gregory Peony (2025-07-20 20:06:51+00:00): You correctly updated the residential area (though it could be slightly more accurate), and correctly modifed the tags of the existing place point. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169091843
Gregory Peony (2025-07-19 02:23:56+00:00): This residential area should have been extended south and the place node would then be tagged as a village. Resolution in Changeset: 169134539
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169091850
Gregory Peony (2025-07-20 02:26:56+00:00): Hi yennien, You added a redundant place node here. When there is existing data please modify it rather than duplicating it. In this case the place tag should have been modified from place=hamlet to place=village . --- Residential areas should include the entirety of appropriate buildings and yards. See how I mapped it by looking through the task changesets. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169091937
Gregory Peony (2025-07-18 20:48:05+00:00): The place POI is accurately mapped and tagged. The residential area could be extended in places to include all likely residential land. You added unnecesary tags to the residetial area; landuse=residential is sufficient. Name is reserved for features that have names e.g. Eiffel Tower. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169091948
Gregory Peony (2025-07-18 20:57:58+00:00): Resolved in Changeset: 169128435
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169091948
Gregory Peony (2025-07-19 17:28:44+00:00): Valid steeltment mapping but the residential area should be extended in some places. You should envelope all appropriate buildings and land within a residential area and not have it cutting across buildings in the imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169092016
Frans S (2025-07-18 10:23:42+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Being a new mapper, we (validators) takes the time to review your work and comment on your mappings when there is a reason for that.
Check the instructions, please.
Isolated dwellings are no subject to be mapped. As from 4 buildings close together, you can map them as a hamlet.
Best regards and keep mapping
Gregory Peony (2025-07-20 19:24:39+00:00): Hi, it looks like you mapped this inline with project instructions. Good job with your residential area accuracy; buildings don't appera to have been left out or overlapped.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169092072
Gregory Peony (2025-07-20 19:54:30+00:00): Quite an accurate residential area and accurate place node. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169092087
Gregory Peony (2025-07-20 19:36:48+00:00): Good judgement on not extending the Northern residential area across the highway/waterway just to add two buildings to it. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169092164
Gregory Peony (2025-07-19 17:24:15+00:00): Land use areas and highways should not share common (grey) nodes. Hold alt when mapping in ID to prevent the creation of shared nodes. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169092210
Tomas Straupis (2025-07-18 07:33:34+00:00): Čia gi savaitės renginys... kam jį į OSM dėti?
Gregory Peony (2025-07-18 20:07:43+00:00): Hi Vincent. The settlements you mapped here look okay... it's just that you mapped them in Nepal instead of Chad. When mapping using ID in a tasking manager you should see a pink area denoting the task boundary. If you do not see this then save your work if it's valid and reload your browser or the task. Without a defined boundary you may map endlessly adding each feature that comes into view. Watch this to see what I mean https://youtu.be/XMtpZf9RoMc?feature=shared&t=3146 Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169092483
Gregory Peony (2025-07-18 20:07:46+00:00): Hi Vincent. The settlements you mapped here look okay... it's just that you mapped them in Nepal instead of Chad. When mapping using ID in a tasking manager you should see a pink area denoting the task boundary. If you do not see this then save your work if it's valid and reload your browser or the task. Without a defined boundary you may map endlessly adding each feature that comes into view. Watch this to see what I mean https://youtu.be/XMtpZf9RoMc?feature=shared&t=3146 Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169092483
NeisBot (2025-07-18 07:06:27+00:00): Hi 〽️ D̷, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added name tag to a way, identifying it as Goldbergspitze."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #NoComment #AIgenerated
kuhni74 (2025-11-12 23:54:37+00:00): scree is not a peak
Gregory Peony (2025-07-19 17:22:28+00:00): Overall a good contribution. The SE residential area could have been extended West and South. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169092535
kuhni74 (2025-11-12 23:59:44+00:00): the arete has no name!
Gregory Peony (2025-07-20 19:04:58+00:00): Hi, you deleted an existing place node that represented the settlement in the South. The reason for critical severity is that information about this place like its name were likely sourced via survey meaning that the information must be reaquired and added to the new place node you added if the deletion were not noticed. The value of the place tag of the existing place node should have been modified to village. Don't fret I un did the deletion of the old place node. In future consider if it is appropriate to delete of modify existing data. Resolution https://osmcha.org/changesets/169207856 ---Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169092636
Gregory Peony (2025-07-20 14:58:24+00:00): Hi ChienC, you mapped valid settlements here but the residential areas could have been more accurately mapped. If you choose to map with two distinct residential areas then you don't need to include the space between these settlements becasue it appears to be mainly road/driven on.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169092662
Gregory Peony (2025-07-21 00:35:12+00:00): Hi Annie, You updated the geometry of the residential area and correctly modified the tags of the place point. The residential area should have also included the buildings to the NE and E.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169092676
Frans S (2025-07-18 10:14:29+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You could include a few more buidings in the north west part of the residential building.
I added them .
Best regards and keep mapping
Gregory Peony (2025-07-21 02:05:58+00:00): Hi, you deleted a place point which contained the name of a settlement. Consider what it is appropriate for you to modify and delete based on the information sources available to you. For example it is possible to see with aerial imagery alone that the shape of features like residential areas has changed or that buildings no longer exist. For names however you'd either have to conduct a survey, or reference another source where the name is documented. Resolved in https://osmcha.org/changesets/169220231 --- Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169092865
AndreaDp271 (2025-07-28 09:29:35+00:00): Thank you for your contribution but try to make smaller changeset areas. Thank you. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169092882
Gregory Peony (2025-07-20 19:13:30+00:00): Individual plots like this do not warrant place points.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169092896