piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-02-02 06:54:19+00:00): Hello Maximilian030210, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1473429838

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177981833
Taya_S (2026-02-13 09:06:37+00:00): Reverted fantasy edit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178493214
trial (2026-02-02 15:33:22+00:00): Au vu de https://brest.fr/actualites/brest-le-pont-le-ble-inaugure, la piste cyclable est ouverte.
circle61815971 (2026-02-03 18:21:37+00:00): Bonjour, comme l'indique le commentaire de changeset je m'occupe surtout de la circulation piétonne, pas des pistes cyclables. J'ai changé le trottoir que j'ai vu fini mais comme je n'ai pas encore traversé le pont à pied je préférerais faire les modifications sur toute la longueur une fois que j'aurai vérifié sur place. Au niveau de la station de tram où je faisais les modifications, la surface de la piste cyclable côté pont n'était pas bitumée tout à l'heure donc je ne sais pas si c'est parce qu'elle n'est pas finie ou parce que ce ne sera pas bitumé. Et côté fac des sciences le personnel du chantier était justement en train de bitumer la piste cyclable tout à l'heure. Bref, à suivre dans les prochains jours
NeisBot (2026-02-02 06:55:09+00:00): Hello Maximilian030210, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1473431235

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177982012
Taya_S (2026-02-13 09:07:05+00:00): Reverted fantasy edit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178493240
rarad74 (2026-02-02 07:18:08+00:00): Salut. Ai deconectat si drumul de acces la biserica de strada. L-am reconectat eu la loc.
Căprar Andrei (2026-02-02 20:06:13+00:00): Salut! Am verificat în Bing Streetside și am observat ca drumul de acces (oltarului) se conectează de fapt la intersecția cu Silvestru la cum sunt asezate masinile pe Streetside si satelit. L-am reconectat acolo. Mulțumesc pentru semnalare!
trial (2026-02-02 09:00:39+00:00): la salle 3, c'est juste une référence, pas un nom. Prat Foën le nom du groupe scolaire, plateau sportif et lieu-dit.
Sébastien Pi (2026-02-02 22:30:16+00:00): Mieux ainsi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70440657/history/5 ?
trial (2026-02-03 09:51:10+00:00): Oui.
Udarian (2026-02-01 21:59:37+00:00): changeset generated with speedwalk and uploaded from JOSM.
https://a-b-street.github.io/speedwalk
tallcoleman (2026-02-03 12:56:49+00:00): Thanks @MattTheLombax - just want to confirm, have the bike lockers behind the GO station building been removed now?
tallcoleman (2026-02-09 12:16:04+00:00): Never mind - see the note on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13517877457 that they were moved. Thanks!
I-76 (2026-02-26 17:03:45+00:00): Bala Cynwyd has been placed at the nexus of the universe!
Baloo Uriza (2026-02-10 16:09:17+00:00): I tend to map duplexes as a single building with more than one address.  YMMV.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177983515
trial (2026-02-02 09:17:06+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez mis 6 fois le nom sur chaque tour, chaque tour ne s'appelle pas Les six tours
jieff6_10 (2026-02-02 13:52:05+00:00): Bonjour, effectivement, c'était une première pour moi, j'ai posé la question sur le forum (https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/noms-de-lotissements/39652/8) et il y a un petit débat dont j'attends la conclusion avant d'apporter le changement.
marczoutendijk (2026-02-05 14:17:37+00:00): Hi,
On many spots you have used place=Commune, what do you mean by that? There is no entry in the wiki list for that value.
Can you replace it with something more useful?
Best regards  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2026-02-05 14:18:35+00:00): If you run this overpass, you'll see them all:
[out:json][timeout:100];
nwr["place"="Commune"];
out meta;
>;
out skel qt;
Oleg_MD (2026-02-05 18:02:03+00:00): Hi,
Where did I addedd the tag "place=Commine"?
It was there before my edits.
Best regards.
marczoutendijk (2026-02-05 20:49:50+00:00): Ok, that was my mistake. Didn't look at the history.
But if you see something that is wrong, you maybe should have reported it to the DWG.
Oleg_MD (2026-02-05 21:39:38+00:00): 1. It is useful that you recognized your mistake.
2. I did not see the "Commune" tag (you were the first to mention this to me), as I was busy checking the names of hundreds human settlements in Moldova.
3. No need to tell me what to do in this specific situation, like replacing something I did not edit or reporting things I did not notice.
When I discover something that I want to edit, I do not give advices, I go and edit it. And I know about DWG.
Regards.
marczoutendijk (2026-02-08 15:28:10+00:00): The original mapper (which I contacted) now has fixed all the place=Commune tags.
Oleg_MD (2026-02-08 17:28:50+00:00): Thank you for your contribution.
Regards.
whenpigsfly (2026-02-02 01:59:29+00:00): Reversion of vandalism. Vandal not respecting OSM guidelines: Per wiki, Key:name, Key:loc_name, Key:addr:city et al: "If a city is locally known by a different name, it is better to put the local name in loc_name=* and put the standard name into name=*, even if locals don't use the standard name as much," "If a feature has multiple names, try to classify them using rich semantic tags like the ones in the table (like short_name=*, old_name=*, etc.)," and "short_name=* should be a recognizable commonly-used short version of the name..."

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177987351
Leo Slager (2026-02-02 00:30:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2026-02-02 00:33:22+00:00): Hallo Jens,

Het water is nu bovenop het gras ingetekend.
Als je dat correct wil doen zou dat in de vorm van een multi-polygoon moeten worden ingevoerd in de database. Dat is voor een beginner wat te moeilijk. Dan zou je dat onderwerp in de wiki uitgebreid bestudeerd moeten hebben.

Ik pas het even aan.
dankarran (2026-02-02 10:43:01+00:00): Hi Chris. Do you know if that stile is still on the edge of the site? I'm guessing it may have gone since the site has been redeveloped? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4456946460
Chris Hogben (2026-02-02 10:49:41+00:00): The stile is still there - it's made of stone and would have been a shame to remove it.  There's a short path from the stile to the ovoid track, but that's about it.
dankarran (2026-02-02 11:38:31+00:00): Fair enough - thanks for that. It's a while since I've been to the Strang area!
Comino (2026-02-02 08:37:04+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Maps
Comino (2026-02-03 22:49:56+00:00): Bitcoin education tag as church?
Please adjust this and other tags!

Edwin Comino
BTC Maps
BrummsLee (2026-02-06 23:08:41+00:00): Hallo Oberlausitzer42!
Warum vergreifst du dich wiederholt an Straßen und Wegen und nimmst Löschungen und Änderungen vor?
Liest du denn die Changesetkommentare der anderen Usern und mir nicht?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177268224
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177661585
Ich glaube dir, daß du in Rothenburg wohnst und auch arbeitest. Deswegen versuche ich auch, so viele deiner Ergänzungen zu erhalten.
Leider liest du wohl nicht viel im OSM Wiki zu den Richtlinien.
Deswegen sind viele deiner Bearbeitungen nicht korrekt und müssen aufwendig bearbeitet werden.
Das ist nicht sehr zielführend in OSM, zumal du auch nicht mit uns kommunizierst.
Für dich mag zwar ein Rodelberg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1472786100/history/1 ein Name Rodelberg mit Hinweisen sein... wird in OSM aber komplett anders erfasst. 
Ich bin kein Profi und mir unterlaufen auch Fehler, aber ich ändere keine jahrelang erfassten Straßenklassifizierungen und lösche auch nur selten Bearbeitungen anderer User!
Bitte ändere keine Bearbeitungen anderer User mehr und lass die Finger von den Straßen. 
Vielleicht solltest du dich mehr auf die Ergänzung von Rasenflächen und Bäumen konzentrieren... oder du erstellst Hinweise für die Bearbeitungen. 
Gruß
BrummsLee (2026-02-06 23:16:29+00:00): Noch ein Nachtrag...
Solltest du hier weiterhin so unkommunikativ in deiner Art agieren, dann behalte ich mir eine Anfrage im Forum zu dir und deinen Bearbeitungen vor.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56
nyanpsyche (2026-02-02 21:06:00+00:00): So exciting to see the city finally implement this!

Just wanted to check which direction they implemented the one-way street on Lillooet Street between Venables and Parker. I won't be able to check it in person until later this week, but the update letter from December noted it would be southbound and not northbound.
krmatthews (2026-02-03 03:59:26+00:00): I cycled it in both directions, so it's definitely possible that I got the direction mixed up. I might be going by again on Thursday, if so I'll double-check. If the letter says otherwise then I probably got it wrong.
krmatthews (2026-02-06 07:15:25+00:00): I was wrong. I've fixed the direction.
c0nsumer (2026-02-22 21:16:58+00:00): Hey there! Just wanted to give you a heads-up that a lot of these equestrian trails don't have their intersections defined properly, so they create warnings and validation problems in the editors.
DwightTee (2026-02-23 01:01:38+00:00): Thanks for the comment. I believe someone else made a similar comment and then someone from Open Streets said not to worry about it. It's mostly intersections with trails not intersections with actual roads. I asked for direction on how to fix it and someone from Open Street said not to worry about it. If you have information on what I should do, please let me know. Thanks in advance for your help.
c0nsumer (2026-02-23 01:53:25+00:00): I hope this helps, but in general you want to do things like ensure that -- even though they aren't roads -- that the Equestrian trails have a node at intersections with other trails, and that the end of them is at another trail or a parking lot / staging area / trailhead / etc.

If you'd like, take a look the mountain bike trails on the more western side of the area. I've been spending some time this weekend going through and cleaning up the MTB trails, ensuring the same kind of intersection issues are fixed, so maybe that'd work as an example?
ljc_jlyb (2026-02-02 08:55:01+00:00): Please keep your changesets local, thank you.
brdrsrsu (2026-02-02 10:17:44+00:00): 1. Do not use "name:en" tag for POI descriptions, especially in non English speaking nations. Name is the POIs name only. Use description key for descriptions, and note key for notes or opinions.

2. tourism=information is not for your peronal notes or opinions for helping tourists, it is for tagging on-the-ground tourism information boards, guideposts, info centers, etc. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dinformation

3. Please do not clump various geographical regions into one changeset. Baltic region should have been a separate changeset from the one in South East Asia, and these two separate from East Asia.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177985498
Colbertson (2026-02-02 11:24:36+00:00): Most likely maps.me confusing OSM edits with personal bookmarks.
Looking through the edits it looks like theres good data, just needs to be turned into something usable.
Colbertson (2026-02-02 11:37:25+00:00): Actually now im wondering how old this data is. Im local to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13518303211/ and im pretty sure that hasnt been there for quite a while.
旧加卷 (2026-02-03 03:57:35+00:00): The tagging for the bus stations is incomplete. Names should be written in the local language, and names should not be invented by adding descriptive text (this is not PTv2 route naming). Also, the name of a bus station should not be the name of a route.
ceirios (2026-02-02 22:53:31+00:00): Helo Mark!

Croeso a diolch am gyfrannu (welcome and thanks for contributing!)

In the "name" field, we only need to map the common name, in this case "Y Felin"

If you click the little "+" icon to the right of the name field, you can add in the same name in different languages including Welsh and English.

Cofion
Ceirios :)
whenpigsfly (2026-02-02 02:00:53+00:00): Reversion of vandalism. Vandal not respecting OSM guidelines: Per wiki, Key:name, Key:loc_name, Key:addr:city et al: "If a city is locally known by a different name, it is better to put the local name in loc_name=* and put the standard name into name=*, even if locals don't use the standard name as much," "If a feature has multiple names, try to classify them using rich semantic tags like the ones in the table (like short_name=*, old_name=*, etc.)," and "short_name=* should be a recognizable commonly-used short version of the name..."
Comino (2026-02-02 08:34:00+00:00): Hi,

Their website reads: "Our headquarters facility is for production purposes only and not open to the public."
There is no mention of accepting Bitcoin either. A publicly accessible physical address is an absolute must on OSM.
Please delete this entry.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
countrymouse (2026-02-28 04:52:18+00:00): It looks like this node has been deleted now.  I had checked only address formatting without checking the appropriateness of the other pre-existing tags.  Thank you for addressing this issue!
Herman Lee (2026-02-02 06:31:07+00:00): 本修改集已退回，详见：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177992072
Herman Lee (2026-02-02 06:31:02+00:00): 本修改集已退回，详见：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177992072
hahae (2026-02-02 03:08:10+00:00): 您好，回退不是只删除名称即可，将 admin_level 改为22也并不是正确的改法。如果您想自己建立属于自己的地图，可以自建 openstreetmap 实例
Herman Lee (2026-02-02 06:30:58+00:00): 本修改集已退回，详见：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177992072
Glassman (2026-02-02 19:23:41+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177988187
Herman Lee (2026-02-02 06:30:53+00:00): 本修改集已退回，详见：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177992072
Herman Lee (2026-02-02 06:30:46+00:00): 本修改集已退回，详见：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177992072
NeisBot (2026-02-02 06:58:17+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/247140686 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Janitorial services building"

#MapWithoutSpam
SEOJosh (2026-02-05 06:00:37+00:00): Oh i see. sorry i though it is okay i will change it right away. thanks
Herman Lee (2026-02-02 06:30:39+00:00): 本修改集已退回，详见：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177992072
Herman Lee (2026-02-02 06:30:26+00:00): 本修改集已退回，详见：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177992072
NeisBot (2026-02-02 03:56:13+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (3 changesets) shows that 342 of your last 375 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=19946435
Herman Lee (2026-02-02 06:30:21+00:00): 本修改集已退回，详见：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177992072
Fizzie-DWG (2026-02-02 08:32:57+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19736
NeisBot (2026-02-02 06:57:28+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1473494651 v1 | 9 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177989106
vieclamaivn (2026-02-02 03:58:17+00:00): https://vieclam.ai.vn/
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1MTsun5Z3Cag8t83_SqCdMLZkLMU8uWkL
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_BZxvHOBMtF2iy5dxT6JVJLhEfc8L56XfLkkgk1PXMQ/edit?usp=drivesdk
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Lgg0OvOhSbO5XQ4vmwMH5Jqu7BeYZLVn
https://sites.google.com/view/vieclamaivn/trang-ch%E1%BB%A7
https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=15q6qw5f2S9Aznoy3tlFruAIVrMmIgXI&ll=10.77358840000001%2C106.69049949999999&z=17
https://vieclamaivn.blogspot.com/2026/02/vieclamaivn.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLqqcqbdzLc
https://x.com/vieclamaivn/status/2018159337127268625
https://creators.spotify.com/pod/profile/vieclamai3/episodes/vieclam-ai-vn-tuyn-dng-PG-siu-th--PG-thi-v-e3egnfb/a-acet04e
https://www.scoop.it/topic/vieclam-ai-vn/p/4169947308/2026/02/02/vieclam-ai-vn-nen-tang-viec-lam-danh-rieng-cho-oi-ngu-thi-truong-sales-pg-hang-au
NeisBot (2026-02-02 06:57:29+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1069864046 v2 | 6 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177989782
NeisReview (2026-02-09 07:22:49+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178035125
NeisBot (2026-02-02 06:58:19+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/relation/20163465 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cottage and rent point"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisBot (2026-02-02 06:57:31+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/418037488 v2 | 12 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/4184981076 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177990326
NeisBot (2026-02-02 06:58:20+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13516928350 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Hikers rest stop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-09 07:22:47+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178122581
rskedgell (2026-02-02 08:45:26+00:00): Thanks!
flohoff (2026-02-02 09:49:23+00:00): Moin,
ich hab hier deinen changeset gesehen. Der hat zu routingänderungen geführt deshalb hab ich mal gesucht.

Die Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkung ist hier vorher von 50 auf 70 hochgesetzt worden.

Scheinbar sind da einige mapper der gegenteiligen meinung. 

Ich hab nur schnell map in die verfügbaren (Von 2019) Mapillary Bilder geguckt und da ist am Nördlichen ende ein Z274-70 dokumentiert:

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=928600097902764&focus=photo

Flo
flohoff (2026-02-02 10:03:40+00:00): Ach ja - hier ist so eine der Routingänderungen.

Hier ist interessant das es durch die Rolandstraße geht - Da steht aber nach den Mapillary Bildern ein Z250 + Anlieger + Fahrrad frei.

Also eigentlich dürfte da nix durch gehen. Hab da einen separaten Note für aufgemacht ob das Schild noch da ist. Das Schild hab ich ebenfalls dokumentiert mit einem link zu dem mapillary bild.


https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=765276,1205424
marauder156 (2026-02-02 11:15:03+00:00): Bin da gestern langgefahren. Mitlerweile alles 50km/h wegen Straßenschäden. Die Straße ist ein Trümmerhaufen.
marauder156 (2026-02-02 11:15:40+00:00): Mittlerweile
marauder156 (2026-02-02 11:18:23+00:00): Die Rolandstraße ist in der Tat nur für Anlieger und Radfahrer frei
NeisBot (2026-02-02 06:04:21+00:00): Hi nilloc29, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 91% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 10 highway(s)
- 3 name(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177991584
NeisBot (2026-02-02 06:48:21+00:00): Hi nilloc29, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 91% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 amenity(s)
- 15 highway(s)
- 3 name(s)
- 3 surface(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177992522
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 04:51:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). User proper capitalisation for values.  Start small with one or two  feature edits.  review and fix your edits
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177993064
impiaaa (2026-02-02 18:46:27+00:00): Hello, please note that copying from Google Maps is illegal. Also, spam is prohibited on OpenStreetMap. Finally, using multiple accounts in an organized manner must be documented per the Organized Editing Guidelines: https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines