piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
wombatmaper (2025-05-23 22:15:23+00:00): I did not take a photo when I was there in person. Google has a picture but I am not sure if posting it here would be considered a copyright issue, since I am mapping based on local knowledge, and only trying to prove my point I guess?
archie (2025-05-24 06:45:36+00:00): There is nothing unusual or special  at all with this blockage or with this road. Routing with barrier-ways works beautifully with routing-servers on osm.org, thats why people use barrier-ways. Just test it and see for yourself and don't spread fakes (or are you refering to your own routing-server - in this case "tagging for the renderer" applies). 
I restored the barrier-way and changed the road to service (as it is blocked and a dead-end).
SomeoneElse (2025-05-24 09:42:25+00:00): Actually, one more thing, "resolved issued detected by id " suggests that you think the suggestions that iD offers (including things like operator/brand, wikidata, etc.) are correct.  My experience is that often they are not.
I personally would not accept any suggestion by iD unless I personally knew that the suggestion was correct.
One of the ways that iD can mess things up is described at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposed-automated-edit-removal-of-crossing-markings-yes-tags-introduced-in-undiscussed-automated-edits/129614/26 ; as noted there I logged that issue with them two years ago at https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/9529 with no positive effect.
I suspect that the presets that iD uses in Scandinavian countries will have had many fewer eyes on them than the UK ones, and many of those will be unfamiliar with grammar rules for e.g. apostrophes and capitalisation where they differ from English.
wombatmaper (2025-05-24 10:05:20+00:00): @archie I suggest reading the wiki, "Rendering of a map is the process of making a visual image on the basis of raw geospatial data and tags. ".  A router is not a renderer. Just read it and see for yourself and don't spread fakes.
wombatmaper (2025-05-24 10:09:42+00:00): Indeed, some of the iD fixes are problematic, I have contributed some fixes in the past to the iD repository but other ones, such as the misspeling of "Göteborgs Stad" still need to be fixed. I generally only resolve obvious fixes to places I have already been.
SomeoneElse (2025-05-24 10:11:24+00:00): (with regard to the wiki) that's supposed to document how people map, not tell people how to map.
There are many, many wiki pages that contradict other wiki pages.
It's a useful guide, but all it tells you is that "the last person that edited that page thought X".
Andrea Musuruane (2025-05-12 06:41:33+00:00): Do not copy any information from Wikipedia into OSM. Please revert: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welcome_to_Wikipedia_users#We_are_much_stricter_about_copyright
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166127066
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-11 22:00:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7117169766
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159822323

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
JG Mazury (2025-05-11 22:51:12+00:00): Adres jest poprawny. Poniżej zdjęcie budynku:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fEQQh-gRAShwZXDC7y-89Dnb5WVoSIjO/view?usp=drive_link
Na mapie przedmiotowy budynek był oznaczony numerem 1. W rzeczywistości to numer posesji z Zamkiem krzyżackim.
Dodam jeszcze, że przy ulicy Zamkowej jest więcej podwójnych numerów: 3, 9 i 11.
Jak taki problem rozwiązać?
Baloo Uriza (2025-05-11 22:44:57+00:00): Hi there!  Looks like you're trying to add a house to the map.  I'm guessing the address number is 7851, correct?  Is the house actually named or no?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166127678
Dodko (2025-05-16 12:26:18+00:00): Farba trasy sa robí inak, určite nie 
name=Modrá turistická trasa

je to trochu zložitejšie pre skúsenejších cez relácie treba napojiť daný úsek a odpojiť neaktuálny

minimálne pozrieť video pre začiatok https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q59kIyirKzM aby mal človek prehľad o čo ide
Ovič (2025-05-19 12:45:40+00:00): Ďakujem za info. Nejdem to študovať, nejdem sa úpravám mapy intenzívne venovať. 
Môžem poprostiť Teba/dakoho iného, kto to vie pretentononc do normálneho stavu?
Ďakujem.
Aethonatic (2025-05-11 22:12:46+00:00): Small edits in Dundee, but then edits all the way in Myanmar? Where did those come from?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166127833
Dodko (2025-05-16 12:43:36+00:00): Prečo dávate na cyklotrasu značku access=no ?
LegendaSM07 (2025-05-22 19:45:42+00:00): hej to som dal zle, totižo som to pochopil takto: tú značku všetko v tom poli som pochopil že ako všetky typy dopravy, nie ako prístup verejnosti. ospravedlňujem sa a napravím
Dodko (2025-05-16 12:21:28+00:00): Značka name sa vyplní len ak je objekt skutočne pomenovaný, nedávajte opisné názvy typu (posed, studnička, chodník...). 
To že je to posed už vyjadruje značka amenity=hunting_stand
archie (2025-05-11 22:34:48+00:00): Vill du vänligen notera att barrier enl wikin mycket väl får vara på en way tom på en closed way. Nu har du på nytt raderat helt korrekt taggning.
archie (2025-05-11 22:37:38+00:00): Vill du vara vänlig att tillgodogöra dig innehållet i wikin om barriers:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier. "Used on these elements..."
Vänligen håll dig till regeln i wikin att inte radera det du inte förstår, tack.
wombatmaper (2025-05-11 22:42:39+00:00): https://imgur.com/o0r4ZhX
wombatmaper (2025-05-11 22:43:02+00:00): Jag föreslår att du läser avsnittet ”block” först.
archie (2025-05-11 22:49:30+00:00): Jag föreslår att du orienterar dig bättre: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/23V7
wombatmaper (2025-05-11 22:55:11+00:00): I think you still completely fail to understand what I am saying, so maybe english is better for you:

A barrier needs to be a node on the way that it is blocking, otherwise it cannot be parsed by any router.
You can optionally add the barrier as a way, but if the intersection node is not tagged as a barrier it wont work.
wombatmaper (2025-05-11 22:56:52+00:00): https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/23V8
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-11 22:41:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12691965924
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1090250765

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Osiedle świętego Krzysztofa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/894652137
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/894652354
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/894652405
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/894652802

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
JJIglesias (2025-05-12 15:58:50+00:00): Excelente aporte muchas gracias
Jordi MF (2025-05-12 22:24:29+00:00): Esta cuenta, probablemente, es del mismo usuario que recurrentemente crea nuevas cuentas para evitar un bloqueo por vandalismo desde hace meses.

No responde nunca a los changesets, tiene un comportamiento de edición similar a dichas cuentas, repite patrón de denominación (nombre del pueblo en el que se centra en editar) y se reactiva, justamente, a la vez que otras cuentas recién creadas y bloqueadas (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Julius%20Alcatraz/blocks y https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Juan%20Carlos%20Rovira/blocks).
RedAuburn (2025-05-11 22:46:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4753904
AlexSpritze (2025-08-26 07:12:33+00:00): moin spillunke,
ich habe `bridge=yes` vom Weg entfernt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171011250
santamariense (2025-05-12 00:47:29+00:00): Olá johnmogi

Tudo bem.  Observe que "demarcando novos limites na cidade" não condiz com o que está sendo editado.

Qual o motivo para elevar a via para motorway? Não seria motorway, uma vez que ela tem acesso direto a lotes, o que a descaracteriza como motorway.
wombatmaper (2025-05-11 23:03:40+00:00): Hej Archie, vänligen delta i diskussionen och avstå från vandalism.
Hello archie, please engage in discussion and refer from vandalism.
Hallo Archie, bitte beteiligen Sie sich an der Diskussion und sehen Sie von Vandalismus ab.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166128294#map=19/57.843357/12.312401
wombatmaper (2025-05-11 23:04:14+00:00): reverting https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166128773
archie (2025-05-12 07:26:19+00:00): Just to mention a few more "vandalism" for you to revert:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317671120
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1197643876 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158189346 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/703475550
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241052243
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/622821044
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1176921639 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/824151436 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/153228546 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/435385252 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/782442279
wombatmaper (2025-05-12 11:38:12+00:00): see the discussion here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166128294#map=19/57.843357/12.312401
archie (2025-05-12 12:19:57+00:00): Some more vandalism for you to revert:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375014224 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373313020 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1349064151 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/767964067 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193569750 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/949466966 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1289622126 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/809617793 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/831343443 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130296986 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/907751367 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/767964069 

You are about to conceal your (wombatmaper) vandalism in cs https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166126886. 

In this cs you deleted the way [barrier=block], consisting of three nodes (#12633258379, 12633258380 and 11638849003 [last node intersection with highway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11638849003/history) ]). 

You completly erased the following tagging: 
bicycle=yes	
foot=yes	
material=stone	
maxwidth=0.5	
vehicle=no

This can not be deemed as anything other than gross vandalism.

Your reaction to my comment was, that the barrier-tagging was on a way and not a node. 

Well according to wiki and in practice barrier (even blocks) are allowed and are on ways, even closed ways (see examples above). Apparently you will not accept this.
wombatmaper (2025-05-12 12:23:55+00:00): False, the tags you mentioned are still there: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11638849003

Only now they are correctly applied to the barrier node, not a way.
wombatmaper (2025-05-12 12:25:32+00:00): And as I have already pointed out, the "block" barrier is specified for nodes only according to the wiki: https://imgur.com/o0r4ZhX
You have refused to acknowledge this.
wombatmaper (2025-05-12 12:28:08+00:00): Instead of engaging in any discussion on this topic with your fellow mappers you have decided to repeatedly revert my work.

I applaud that you are finally willing to have a discussion, next time discuss such things with your fellow editors before engaging in vandalism.
wombatmaper (2025-05-12 12:29:09+00:00): Here one of my comments from the other discussion that you ignored: A barrier needs to be a node on the way that it is blocking, otherwise it cannot be parsed by any router.
You can optionally add the barrier as a way, but if the intersection node is not tagged as a barrier it wont work.
archie (2025-05-12 12:30:10+00:00): Then this cs https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166126886, where tagging was deleted (this is rather obvious, denying this is a bit foolish), was not yours?
wombatmaper (2025-05-12 12:35:03+00:00): I will once again refer you to the discussion on said change set: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166126886#c1434124

Where you can see that I acknowledged the mistake and fixed it, only for you to once again revert it.
archie (2025-05-12 12:35:53+00:00): in wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dblock
"Used on these elements" followed by symbol for node and way.
wombatmaper (2025-05-12 12:39:33+00:00): in wiki osm.wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dblock "Start by placing a tag barrier=block on a node node that's part of an existing way to indicate where the barrier is."
archie (2025-05-12 12:56:44+00:00): in wiki osm.wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dblock
"Used on these elements" followed by symbol for node and way.
archie (2025-05-12 13:01:49+00:00): All these ways [barrier=block] have been done in accordance with osm-wiki by different mappers, but against wombatmaper's wish: 

osm.org/way/1317671120
osm.org/way/1197643876
osm.org/way/158189346
osm.org/way/703475550
osm.org/way/241052243
osm.org/way/622821044
osm.org/way/1176921639
osm.org/way/824151436
osm.org/way/153228546
osm.org/way/435385252
osm.org/way/782442279 
osm.org/way/375014224
osm.org/way/373313020
osm.org/way/1349064151
osm.org/way/767964067
osm.org/way/1193569750
osm.org/way/949466966
osm.org/way/1289622126
osm.org/way/809617793
osm.org/way/831343443
osm.org/way/130296986
osm.org/way/907751367
osm.org/way/767964069
wombatmaper (2025-05-12 13:37:29+00:00): Well it seems like you are unwilling to engage in any form of constructive discussion. Instead you have been making up falsehoods while completely ignoring any of my arguments. Feel free to actually read any of the reasoning I have given (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166128294#c1434141 for example) to you and contact me again once you are willing to engage in constructive discussion.
archie (2025-05-12 13:46:44+00:00): All these ways [barrier=block] have been done in accordance with  osm-wiki by different mappers in different countries, but against wombatmaper's wish: 

osm.org/way/1317671120
osm.org/way/1197643876
osm.org/way/158189346
osm.org/way/703475550
osm.org/way/241052243
osm.org/way/622821044
osm.org/way/1176921639
osm.org/way/824151436
osm.org/way/153228546
osm.org/way/435385252
osm.org/way/782442279 
osm.org/way/375014224
osm.org/way/373313020
osm.org/way/1349064151
osm.org/way/767964067
osm.org/way/1193569750
osm.org/way/949466966
osm.org/way/1289622126
osm.org/way/809617793
osm.org/way/831343443
osm.org/way/130296986
osm.org/way/907751367
osm.org/way/767964069
wombatmaper (2025-05-12 13:49:38+00:00): The same straw man again, and again and again...
archie (2025-05-12 13:57:35+00:00): All these ways [barrier=block] have been done in accordance with  osm-wiki by different mappers in different countries, but against wombatmaper's wish: 

osm.org/way/1317671120
osm.org/way/1197643876
osm.org/way/158189346
osm.org/way/703475550
osm.org/way/241052243
osm.org/way/622821044
osm.org/way/1176921639
osm.org/way/824151436
osm.org/way/153228546
osm.org/way/435385252
osm.org/way/782442279 
osm.org/way/375014224
osm.org/way/373313020
osm.org/way/1349064151
osm.org/way/767964067
osm.org/way/1193569750
osm.org/way/949466966
osm.org/way/1289622126
osm.org/way/809617793
osm.org/way/831343443
osm.org/way/130296986
osm.org/way/907751367
osm.org/way/767964069
b-jazz (2025-05-12 23:32:54+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385667365

Hello Desync,

Please don't share the nodes of the green if you have the fairway surrounding the green. If you can't see any fringe around the green, you should make the fairway butt up to the green and share the nodes on the boundary *between* the green and fairway instead. Please read the wiki for visual examples and instructions on how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions, please let me know and I'll gladly help clarify things. Thanks!
DesyncSounds (2025-05-12 23:38:58+00:00): Was just following what was set before me. Whoever did this before me left everything off by a mile it seems. 

Ive done the whole first 9 but it will not let me save which is super frustrating tbh..
b-jazz (2025-05-12 23:48:38+00:00): Yeah, I'm trying to clean up all of the bad examples of this style on the map so that new mappers don't get the idea that this is correct mapping. Check out the wiki and you'll see the right way to map around a fairway and green. Thanks!
DesyncSounds (2025-05-12 23:53:30+00:00): Will do, so are you're working on this course right now?
b-jazz (2025-05-12 23:57:29+00:00): I work on courses across the country cleaning up mapping errors and looking for people making mistakes so I can correct their techniques (and prevent me from having to clean up future errors).
DesyncSounds (2025-05-13 01:19:17+00:00): Should i continue to edit or are you going to edit this specific course? I dont wanna go over anything you are doing
b-jazz (2025-05-13 01:40:39+00:00): Go ahead and continue. The chances that our work would collide are 1 in 1,000 on any given night.
hNdrX_ (2025-05-12 20:32:01+00:00): das, was du beschreibst, hast du nicht gemappt:
Der "Gebäudeteil" ist nur eine Linie ohne korrekte Eigenschaften. Außerdem gehört es weiterhin zum Rewe-Gebäude.
Wolfgang Holtz (2025-05-13 18:59:18+00:00): WEIL ich es nicht selbst gemappt hatte, habe ich es beschrieben, die Linie  eingezeichnet und "Ich will meine Bearbeitungen prüfen lassen" angehakt. PS "Eigentlich" nutze ich hauptsächlich SC, mit iD-Editor ergänze / korrigier ich nur Kleinikeiten.
hNdrX_ (2025-05-14 15:03:43+00:00): Komisch - wenn du deine Bearbeitung geprüft haben möchtest, wird eigentlich ein Tag <review_requested=yes> hinzugefügt - den gibt es hier nicht.

Wir haben ja alle mal klein angefangen: Ich nutze auch häufig den ID-Editor. Wenn du die Garagen eintragen willst, dann solltest du:
1) das Rewe-Gebäude um den Teil verkleinern
2) Die Mehrfach-/Blockgaragen als eigenständiges Gebäude hinzufügen (building=garages) - nicht als building:part. Das ist für komplexere Gebäude, die in mehrere Teilstücke aufgeteilt werden, aber ein Gebäude ergeben. In dem Fall ist es ja ein eigenständiges Gebäude, was nur genau an das andere angrenzt.

Wenn Du Unterstützung brauchst, dann sag Bescheid!
hNdrX_ (2025-05-14 17:05:30+00:00): Sorry: review_requested ist ja eingetragen, habe ich übersehen!
Wolfgang Holtz (2025-05-18 18:06:30+00:00): Das building:part hatte ich benutzt, um die Konturen des Garagengebäudes zu zeigen. 
Habe die Änderungen jetzt wie von dir beschreiben vorgenommen.
(Wie) Wäre es möglich, ein Gebäude aufzuteilen? 
a) in 2 Gebäudeteile
b) 2 eigenständige Gebäude
Bei komplexeren Gebäuden mit vielen Ecken und Kanten, eingetragenen Eingängen u.ä wäre es u.U. sehr schwierig erst ein Gebäude zu verkleinern und dann das neue Gebäude mit exakt derselben Kontur neu zu Zeichnen.
hNdrX_ (2025-05-19 19:37:49+00:00): Ich kenne keinen Weg, der ein Gebäude automatisch aufteilt, ohne dass man das manuell machen muss. Für die Garagen würde ich den tag building=garages empfehlen (auf deutsch "Mehrfach-/Blockgaragen).
stosh77 (2025-09-07 04:01:59+00:00): revised.
AlCeRoma (2025-05-12 08:52:53+00:00): Ciao, perché queste modifiche? La piazza è stata completamente ristrutturata ed è diversa da come appare nelle foto aeree di Bing.
AlCeRoma (2025-05-15 10:37:36+00:00): eseguito rollback con id #166297235
Glassman (2025-05-12 19:07:31+00:00): #TIP: street names are spelled out in OSM. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166130534
felipeeugenio (2025-05-12 13:22:06+00:00): Hola. Esto no es un ambiente de pruebas. Saludos
Carlangas Vielma (2025-05-12 14:10:35+00:00): Hola Felipe, buen día.

Gracias por tu comentario. Solo aclarar que el título "probando" no implica que haya subido cualquier cosa al azar ni que desconozca la finalidad de OSM. Simplemente fue una forma de nombrar mi primer aporte a la plataforma, y quería verificar que se cargara correctamente antes de seguir contribuyendo.

Te agradecería mantener un tono más constructivo, especialmente considerando que no hubo ningún problema real en el aporte realizado.

Te deseo una excelente semana. 
Saludos cordiales.
felipeeugenio (2025-05-12 14:51:20+00:00): Hola. 
Subiste un café que, dado el título del cambio, se asume que no existe, por lo que fue borrado.
Ocasionalmente maperos nuevos que creen que están en un ambiente de pruebas suben una o muchas cosas y es trabajo repararlos, por lo que el comentario se le hace a todos quienes mencionan algo en esa dirección en sus primeras ediciones. Saludos
Carlangas Vielma (2025-05-12 15:06:29+00:00): Hola,
El cambio titulado "probando" fue una prueba intencionada para entender cómo se genera y visualiza información en OSM. El punto no representaba un lugar real y fue eliminado por mí una vez realizada la prueba.
Lo que me sorprendió fue el tono del primer comentario, que transmite que no hay espacio para equivocarse ni aprender. Quienes recién empezamos también necesitamos margen para mejorar.

Ten buena semana,
Saludos
felipeeugenio (2025-05-12 15:27:20+00:00): Hola.
El nodo fue eliminado por mi.
Lo que vimos nosotros es que agregó un café y lo dejó ahí.
Está ok equivocarse, no hay problemas, estamos para ayudar.

Saludos
maps_not_naps (2025-08-19 15:22:06+00:00): Hello Dani Safa Adi Nugraha,

I saw you added a ferry route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385685043) near Kaligawe that isn’t connected to any ferry terminals. The OSM wiki page for ferries states that “The ferry route should start and end at a ferry terminal” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dferry). Do you know where the terminals at the start & end of this ferry route are located?

Thank you.

Terjemahan otomatis

Halo Dani Safa Adi Nugraha,

Saya melihat Anda menambahkan rute feri (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385685043) di dekat Kaligawe yang tidak terhubung ke terminal feri mana pun. Halaman wiki OSM untuk feri menyatakan bahwa "Rute feri harus dimulai dan berakhir di terminal feri" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dferry). Apakah Anda tahu di mana terminal di awal & akhir rute feri ini?

Terima kasih.
ManuelB701 (2025-05-12 04:57:21+00:00): Define "unneeded": Just because I couldn't record any useful data for them doesn't mean they can't be filled in later on.
Hypsometric (2025-05-12 18:14:50+00:00): Thanks for editing and thanks for asking. Based on your reply, I think you realize why they were not needed. But here is the explanation. Ways that use building:part are used for tagging parts of a building differently than the rest of the whole. The building parts that were deleted only had a tag of building:part=*. No other tags were provided. So a single way for the entire building is most fitting.

As a side note, I came across these ways because they had invalid values for building:part. They were tagged with a value of "1" when it should have been a descriptive value or "yes".

I'm guessing you're already aware of all of this. But you asked :-)
ManuelB701 (2025-05-13 04:50:39+00:00): But the reason I drew building parts in the first place is because they ARE different in reality (check the areal imagery on that building). That's what I meant with "record any useful data" in that I couldn't figure out any colours or levels when I surveyed this area but the differences are there (hence why they "[can] be filled in later on).

I've decided to restore these building parts because they don't really hurt in the database.
Hypsometric (2025-05-13 12:51:53+00:00): Sounds good. Looks like they are tagged properly now.