piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Leo Slager (2025-07-12 10:44:53+00:00): dag Keven1,

Alle begin is moeilijk en fouten maken we allemaal.
Zo is het in NL niet gebruikelijk om netwerk en operator op een bushalte te taggen.
De bushalte is en blijft eigendom van de gemeente en kan door meerdere busmaatschappijen worden gebruikt. En zelfs worden aangedaan door buslijnen uit verschillende netwerken.
Deze tags horen dus uitsluitend op de buslijnen.

De routerelaties vooral niet wijzigen met de editor iD. Dat gaat altijd fout. Nieuwe wegen of een stop_position wordt achter aan de route toegevoegd en staat dan niet op de juiste plaats in de route.

Ik pas het even aan.

Veel succes met verder mappen.
VictorIE (2025-07-11 18:37:08+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927228930/history

This path is gone at least 20 years. Hence mapped as abandoned:highway=footway
AndreaDp271 (2025-07-28 09:33:16+00:00): Thank you for your contribution but try to make smaller changeset areas. Thank you. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168739890
dieterdreist (2026-04-04 14:47:07+00:00): Ciao Michele,

alle volte POI hanno più civici, ad esempio 72 e 73, in questi casi penso sia più giusto lasciarli nel indirizzo del POI così come sono indicati dall’operatore, e mettere i civici come “civici” a dei nodi del perimetro dell’edificio (o sulla recinzione), con tag entrance=yes/no/main/etc.

Grazie del tuo contributo!

Buona mappatura 
Martin
Michele Aquilani (2026-04-11 03:33:10+00:00): Ciao, ok, se mi è in qualche modo noto inizierò ad aggiungere anche il tag entrance. Solitamente ho separato i civici per chiarire quale fosse l'ingresso per favorire, ad esempio, chi usa le numerose applicazioni per smartphone che sfruttano questi dati.
Grazie per la dritta.
dieterdreist (2026-04-13 07:33:54+00:00): grazie a te! In sostanza in Italia, i civici sono assegnati sempre ad ingressi (di edifici, entrance=* o di lotti, barrier=gate etc.) oppure si riferiscono a potenziali ingressi (ad esempio vetrine), e talvolta ex-ingressi (finestre, ingressi murati). In teoria, quando un ingresso viene murato (con muri) il civico viene tolto, mentre quando sono tamponati (con panelli o simili) il civico rimane. Nella pratica, quando il civico è segnato, lo mapperei (perché è utile quanto uno "valido" ai sensi di orientamento). A lungo termine cercherei di avere tutti i civici mappati insieme al tipo di ingresso, ma ovviamente nel frattempo è sempre molto meglio avere un civico "galleggiante" invece di non avere nessun civico.
Da questi civici (assegnati) ci sono da distinguere gli indirizzi dei POI, che possono avere uno o più civici (o anche nessun civico, nohousenumber=yes). Spero che non ti ho annoiato, che probabilmente già lo sapevi :)
Saluti e buona mappatura,
Martin
JessAk71 (2025-07-11 17:34:41+00:00): Thanks for starting to update the speeds on some of the roads. I have already updated the road segments impacted by the new school zone speed limits around the city but have not done a larger update of the general speed limit on all roads. If you use a tool like JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) it may be a easier task of updating all the roads in a selection set using filters to just get things that are residential streets etc. otherwise a manual process may be needed to make sure the correct road types are tagged correctly. I think also Schenectady lowered their speeds to 25 mph as well.
Yog Sot (2025-07-10 21:12:31+00:00): czyli to jest oczyszczalnia ścieków?
A masz info skąd tam docierają?
Feskil (2025-07-10 21:38:46+00:00): To była oczyszczalnia dla ośrodka. W uzbrojeniu terenu widać kanalizację. Jak byłem na miejscu to też była tabliczka która o tym mówiła
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-07-10 20:20:41+00:00): Lanes should be mapped with tags. Not separate ways.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168740940
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-10 16:55:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168740990

is it tree or bus stop or what?
grzegorz75jan (2025-07-10 18:51:33+00:00): Tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12992261075#map=19/49.884128/20.772615&layers=N drogi nie są połączone co powoduje błąd.
Proszę sprawdzać swoje edycje, zwracać uwagę  na symbol trójkąta w prawym dolnym rogu oraz reagować na te komunikaty i ewentualnie w edytorze włączyć dodatkowe opcje.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168741041
flohoff (2025-07-10 17:40:03+00:00): Moin,
ich glaube das hier ist nicht richtig.

Die ist nicht nur disused - also unbenutzt - sondern die ist ja wirklich entfernt - also razed.

Und das mit dem layer -1 ist auch eher seltsam oder?!? Die ist ja jetzt nicht unter den Gebäuden etc

Flo
HolgerJeromin (2025-09-23 08:42:32+00:00): Argh!
Ich hatte dir schon im https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168729267 gesagt, dass du bitte keine vorhandenen Gebäude wegwerfen und in schlecht neu erstellen sollst!
Du hast schon wieder meinen Carport und Schuppen gelöscht und durch ein Dach ersetzt!
Bitte höre damit auf liebevoll per Hand gezeichnete und vor Ort geprüfte Gebäudearten mit ALKIS Daten mit building=yes zu ersetzen.
wies1 (2025-09-23 10:54:15+00:00): Hallo,
die Gebäude habe ich entsprechend den Daten des NAS, die @flohoff regelmässig einpflegt, modifiziert. Gebäude wurden, wie sich aus OSMCHA ergibt hier keine gelöscht.
Warum Gebäude dann schlecht "neu erstellt sein sollen" angesichts dieser Daten des NAS, verstehe ich daher nicht. Ich spreche wegen diesem Einwand mal @flohoff an.
Gebäudearten - ok.
Gruss
wies1
HolgerJeromin (2025-09-23 14:53:35+00:00): Oh, mein Schuppen ist doch unverändert, hab mich im osm way vertan. 😮
Sorry, für die Anschuldigung. Mein Einwand heute war wirklich haltlos.
yelisey90 (2026-01-13 17:04:08+00:00): reverted: mass changes using not on-the-ground checking, but some undetermined sources, possibly simply aerial imagery; including incorrect surface tagging (asphalt instead of unpaved or sett), incorrect addresses to buildings etc.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177188514
eggie (2025-08-26 20:41:00+00:00): Beste brimzw
Je hebt mijn pas aanlegde noodweg weer verwijderd op grond van oude luchtfoto's.
Ik heb het in overleg met mapper vvad  weer hersteld. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171026289#map=17/53.345322/6.304071&layers=N

Zie ook sat dataportaal. https://oud.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=brtachtergrondkaart&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=16-04-2024&loc=53.34420%2C6.300560%2C19z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2025-08-20&acqid=20250820_105206_PNEO-04_5_1&sensor=Pleiades-NEO

Let svp op de datum van de laatste mutatie en als je niet zeker bent neem dan contact op met voorgaande mapper.


MVG
eggie
YuliyaSurta (2025-07-10 12:49:24+00:00): Also changed road class.
Tjuro (2025-07-12 09:20:22+00:00): Revert StreetComplete vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168828347
user_5359 (2025-07-12 11:02:21+00:00): Hello! Please check my correction of http://www.osm.org/node/12992368741. I changed the key ax to phone
dadavid (2025-07-10 13:32:42+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. 
What did you intend to do here?

I am not sure; The square landuse=industrial does not match up to aerial imagery and even if it did its not supposed to be connected to the road. 

Greetings

David
dadavid (2025-07-10 13:37:05+00:00): are the square brackets around the operator and operator:wikidata tag intentional or is that a mistake that happenend due to copy/paste?

david
Metzor (2025-07-15 21:00:52+00:00): Hallo Pajopath,

Ich habe die Einbahnstraße in die richtige Richtung gedreht. Brouter suspects war etwas unzufrieden ;-)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56724241/history#map=19/48.659102/10.221472&layers=N

Gruß
Metzor
Pajopath (2025-07-15 21:06:57+00:00): Gna… und ich war da sogar heute Mittag noch dran und hab es nicht gesehen. Danke :-)

Grüße
Patrick
rskedgell (2025-07-11 09:13:12+00:00): Unless pedestrian access is explicitly prohibited with a traffic sign and associated traffic order, it is not illegal to walk on any public road in the UK. Access tags in OSM reflect the legal position, not an opinion on whether or not it might be safe or a good idea.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_the_United_Kingdom#625.1
rskedgell (2025-07-23 13:41:43+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169345442
tebby7 (2025-07-24 00:09:43+00:00): Great , thank you for your mapping! To improve for next time, please zoom in close enough when tracing  and please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing 'q' on your keyboard. Keep up the mapping - many thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168743745
dadavid (2025-07-10 13:50:15+00:00): Hi Dave Stret, welcome to OSM :) 

in OSM, we map what is on the ground, and therefore, deleting roads just because they are inaccessible to the general public goes against our rules. See the wiki for details [1]. You can add access=private or access=customers if there is a sign, but don't delete the roads. This ensures that emergency services, the postal service, the owners, workers, and customers can still navigate to the buildings. 

I have reverted your edits. Feel free to ask if you have questions :) 

Greetings

David

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
dadavid (2025-07-10 13:51:10+00:00): reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168743806#c1460196

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168744750
Dave Stret (2025-07-10 14:09:49+00:00): Apologies - I'm trying to run all of the chorley district roads through an app called CityStrides. It plots nodes where there are roads, even if unaccessible to the general public. How do I add private access? Thanks
dadavid (2025-07-11 11:08:20+00:00): hi there, no worries, i figured it was something like that. 
Your changeset comment made your intentions clear, which is very helpful and made it easy to fix :) 

in your editor, you can for example add the tag access=private to the part of the road. see the wiki for details

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
SpinOff (2025-12-07 20:00:29+00:00): Hej. Skąd źródło tej nazwy? W Polskim Rejestrze Nazw Geograficznych to wzgórze nie ma nazwy.
InsertUser (2025-08-05 00:18:51+00:00): This new outline way 1413830616 seems to be a duplicate of both node 502475589 and ways 35039221 and 880148326. 

If all the construction is complete and this is fully opened, shouldn't they be merged into a single "Arle Court Transport Hub" area? (as the council seems to call it: https://www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/ACTH ) 

Additionally, why have you added a new node (12992317188) for a multi-storey car park rather than adding the details about this parking area to the building outline (way 1243333964)? 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-11 23:52:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413830871

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
os-emmer (2025-07-11 12:58:48+00:00): Hallo wies1,
du hast hier wenn ich mich nicht verzählt habe 14x addr:country=yes erfasst. Bitte prüfe das noch mal. Danke.
wies1 (2025-07-11 16:42:26+00:00): Hallo,
danke für den Hinweis. 

Ich hatte schon bemerkt, dass ich das irgendwo gemacht haben muss, wusste aber nicht mehr wo, da ich in mehreren Regionen mappe. Jetzt weiss ich, wo es ist und werde da gleich nachschauen gehen.

Gruss

wies1
wies1 (2025-07-11 16:48:10+00:00): Hallo nochmal,

du hattest dich nicht verzählt, es waren 14. Ich habe es soeben korrigiert.

Gruss
wies1
os-emmer (2025-07-11 19:13:59+00:00): Supi, danke für die schnelle Korrektur :)
aTarom (2025-07-11 12:58:03+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, se han quedado un par de etiquetas como:
add:street2
addr:housenumber2
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413831180/history
es mejor colocar en nodos independientes la información de cada portal, es posible? hay dos accessos por las dos calles del mismo edificio?
Saludos y feliz mapeo
stasiu512 (2025-07-10 13:48:47+00:00): Cześć, po raz kolejny proszę mapowanie ciągów pieszo-rowerowych bez fizycznego rozdzielenia jedną linią.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery
bbqman (2025-07-10 13:49:08+00:00): source: bing
Myazyk (2025-07-10 16:26:51+00:00): Супер!
Leo Slager (2025-07-12 10:56:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
SpinOff (2025-12-07 19:57:42+00:00): Hej. Jakie jest źródło tej nazwy? Kolejne pytanie - ta góreczka według numerycznego modelu terenu jest tylko o 5m wyższa od otaczającego terenu. Czy oznaczanie tego typu obiektów ma sens?
stasiu512 (2025-07-10 13:59:07+00:00): ZKM*
Taya_S (2025-07-10 16:17:54+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168751344
Taya_S (2025-07-10 16:18:23+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168751371
Taya_S (2025-07-10 16:17:55+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168751344
Taya_S (2025-07-10 16:17:56+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168751344
Le Petit Léo (2025-07-25 11:48:54+00:00): Bonjour Dussaujot89,

Je vois que vous avez apporté des modifications concernant la Liaison Sud Auxerre (LISA) et que vous avez créé des rond-points de jonction avec les routes existantes. Mais vous n'avez pas déclaré ces rond-points en construction (highway=construction) alors qu'ils n’existent pas encore sur le terrain.
OSM doit refléter le terrain. Merci d'ajouter ce tag pour que cela soit correct. C'est seulement une fois que la nouvelle route sera en service qu'il faudra remplacer higway=construction par higway=primary (ou secondaire,...)

D'autres part vous n'avez pas mis vos sources (ou avez-vous vu ces informations sur ces modifications ?), ce serait bien de les citer dans la case qui est prévue lorsque vous validez avec l'éditeur en ligne (ID) ou dans la clé source= , de la route.
Soyez un peu plus bavard dans vos commentaires : yonne, c'est un peu léger, il aurait été préférable de mettre :
Auxerre : modification de la future route LISA, par exemple.

Et enfin vous avez ajouté d'autres clés qui n'ont pas a être là vu que ce n'est pas encore construit, comme : lanes=, maxspeed=, noname=,
surface=

Je vois que c'est vos premières contributions, prenez le temps de voir comment font les autres, utilisez le wiki osm https://wiki.openstreetmap.org, aidez-vous avec le forum OSM https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/ et surtout cartographiez plutôt l'existant pour éviter des erreurs.
Bonne cartographie.
Diego Dorn (2025-07-24 22:33:59+00:00): You made one change in Sierra Leone and all the others in Italy. Was it intended?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168745855
custodiankeyy (2025-07-12 01:00:45+00:00): Merhaba, alt_name etiketi alternatif olarak kullanılan isim için kullanılır burada da Bektaşköy, Bektaş bu kısma uyuyor. O yüzden o kısmı geri değiştirdim.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168818280
enezeg (2025-07-15 17:30:12+00:00): Bonjour, il faudrait repasser le café en POI : le bâtiment abrite d'autres bureaux/services que celui de restauration. merci!
fil (2025-08-31 16:09:22+00:00): Done.

Sorry for the noise.  I was trying to get the walking route from IMT Atlantique to cross the pedestrian area, rather than going a longer route on the road, but that failed :-/
aceman444 (2025-08-19 22:45:19+00:00): Ach, ale ten Merkury Market je uplne zniceny, na relaciu obchodu sa zlucili aj znacky (napr. odlisne adresy budov), ktore mali zostat na povodnych budovach. Zrejme vytvor editora iD. A obchod mal byt na obryse okolo tych 3 budov. V pripade dotykajucich sa budov je dost problematicke zjednotit ich do relacie, lepsi je obrys.

Opravil som: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170694314 .
Fifco1 (2025-08-20 09:10:22+00:00): Ďakujem za opravu.
mavl (2025-07-11 13:55:32+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет пешеходную дорожку на пешеходную дорожку.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413838589  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413838587
OSMchik (2025-07-11 19:28:31+00:00): Здравствуйте! Исправил
FMC-Henri (2025-07-10 14:49:58+00:00): Der colour Tag scheint in der Lahnstraße nie korrekt angegeben zu sein. Dieser wird mit cycleway:both:surface:coloour angegeben, sollte aber colour geschrieben werden.
FMC-Henri (2025-07-11 12:14:13+00:00): Ich vermisse außerdem traffic_mode, da rechts parkende Kfz vorhanden sind.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168746928
literan (2025-07-10 19:46:07+00:00): зачем еще один subway_entrance посреди здания? непонятно, что хотели, удалю
RRIbarruri (2025-07-11 07:50:06+00:00): напрасно. Те два входа в отношении только с кольцевой линией. Получается будто входа на сокольническую тут нет, а он есть. Ну и маршрутизация не строит пересадку с кольцевой на сокольническую в этом месте возможно как раз поэтому - очень далеко друг от друга две станции и пешими маршрутами никак не связаны
literan (2025-07-12 08:52:27+00:00): так просто надо было включить существующие входы в отношения обеих станций, а не рисовать выдуманный объект
literan (2025-07-12 12:01:46+00:00): сделал
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-29 03:38:28+00:00): Removed SEO spam tags and fixed/cleaned up others in changeset 183331723

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183331723
rempshaener (2025-07-10 20:06:39+00:00): Hallo,
bitte für die Position "lane" statt "street" verwenden.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2025-07-10 20:02:09+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
- Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie.
- Adressen: Hydranten haben keine Adresse, daher bitte die Straße und die Postleitzahl wieder entfernen.
- Erfassungsdatum: In OSM erfolgt die Erfassung in der Regel nach ISO 8601, d. h. statt 10.07.2025 müsst es 2025-07-10 heißen.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-01 08:47:31+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1039746749/history has historic = 0 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
MorahT (2025-07-10 16:56:32+00:00): The changes in this changeset need reviewing.

The foot path is tagged with bicycle access.  Is this a foot path, or cycle & foot path?
Matthew0903 (2025-07-10 18:29:40+00:00): Foot path
MorahT (2025-07-11 16:34:45+00:00): Thank you for confirming.  While it's wide enough to be a shared path, I can't see any physical signs, ground markings or other information (such as the Swindon Travel Choices/Wichelstowe websites, etc.) indicating bicycles have access rights to use this path and am concerned that cyclists are going to be routed down a path they do not have legal access rights to use.  Furthermore, the type of gate at the end is not consistent with what I would expect if it was a shared path.

While I would be happy to leave the bicycle access tag in place, without any official source indicating that bicycles are permitted, I will need to remove the bicycle access tag.

Changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168805368
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-11 07:00:48+00:00): Do you have the name in Georgian? If so, please add it to the name field instead of English one. I already added English name to the specific field.
mcliquid (2025-07-11 10:30:16+00:00): Hallo, hier ist / war keine Lücke in der Höchstgeschwindigkeit. Die Höchstgeschwindigkeit variiert je nach Fahrtrichtung. Deshalb wurde bereits maxspeed:forward und maxspeed:backward gesetzt. Ein maxspeed zusätzlich ist deshalb nicht sinnvoll bzw. sogar falsch. Ich habe es entfernt.
Viele Grüße
mcliquid
MorahT (2025-07-10 16:58:42+00:00): The changes in this changeset need reviewing.  For example:

A carpark corner node has been deleted.

Multiple nodes on the foot path have been tagged as ways.  A foot path should be a line not a point.

The foot path is tagged with bicycle access.  Is this a foot path, or cycle & foot path?
MorahT (2025-07-11 16:37:16+00:00): Carpark corner node resolved in below changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168768992

Footpath nodes resolved in below changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168805368

For bicycle access tags, see comments on below changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168748479
Glassman (2025-07-10 21:16:31+00:00): The organized editing guidelines your firm added to the OSM wiki state that you will add the following to your changesets "#propertyview" I see that some of your have it and others do not. Please make sure to follow the practice your company made to OSM.
Martaietn (2025-07-10 21:20:08+00:00): Thank you so much for your reminder!

I will add it as agreed.
LordGarySugar (2025-07-11 00:13:55+00:00): highway=road is not the correct value for the footbridge, it should be highway=footway. From aerial imagery it looks like there are steps so you should split the way twice and change the start and and to highway=steps. Also I noticed you added barrier=gate at the top of Dadford road, is this really here or should it have been added near the road on a newly drawn highway=track?
JAKeys (2025-07-12 13:29:26+00:00): Thanks! I think I've fixed the footbridge.
LordGarySugar (2025-08-08 23:27:53+00:00): Thanks :)
mavl (2025-07-10 16:02:14+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 168654269, 168654376, 168654643, 168654654, 168654982, 168676866.
KarlaIbrahić (2025-07-12 20:30:38+00:00): Reverted because node was created. #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168851491
grzegorz75jan (2025-07-10 18:42:54+00:00): Ja ci dam niewielkie zmiany itp. pseudo opisy zmian.
Masz lekturę
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

https://youtu.be/xBMIoypkdI4?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5&t=2596
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168751021
confusedbuffalo (2025-11-24 19:10:50+00:00): Hi, great that you're keeping Springfields up to date.
I see that you only added a partial phone number to Craghoppers Outlet here, "01775".
Do you have the full number for it?
Mapped here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11160801371
citrula (2025-07-10 19:08:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. You are correct, we only use separate ways if there is physical separation, like a wall or median. You can tag the passing lane with the lanes:forward/lanes:backward key as described on the wiki

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes#Two_driving_directions

let me know if you have any questions, happy mapping!
jbcharron (2025-07-13 13:59:12+00:00): Merci pour cette contribution, pour information le tag operator:wikipedia a peu d’intérêt puisqu'il peut être déterminé à partir du tag operator:wikidata
Bonne journée
AurélienQ (2025-07-13 17:39:56+00:00): 👍
Leo Slager (2025-07-12 10:59:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2025-07-12 11:01:44+00:00): Dag skatebikermaps,

De Python Rollercoaster staat al op de kaart en daar op de weide hoort dus niet een dubbele vermelding te staan.

Ik pas het even aan.