piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Bernd498 (2026-07-26 07:34:03+00:00): Hallo Thomas,
super! Vielen Dank fürs Korrigieren und Erläutern! Ich werde auf das Feld beim nächsten Mal achten. Das fiel mir gar nicht auf beim letzten Mal. 

Dankeschön. Dir auch einen schönen Sonntag!
Schöne Grüße 
Bernd
user_5359 (2026-07-25 12:40:11+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1544028299 (one of more than 200 objects). What is the mean of the key memaps:restored_from = way/1075529202
?
Babak Alizadeh (2026-07-25 21:38:01+00:00): These primarily consist of maritime markers and oil pipelines, as well as oil tankers, maritime surveillance facilities, and lighthouses.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-07-24 13:20:44+00:00): THanks for the update, however, to maintain routing, I would suggest reverting, since the construction work will be completed soon (decembre) and thus would be considered temporary.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-07-24 13:27:18+00:00): I kept construction=yes, but I had to put back the previous data (lanes and oneway) so routing is not broken. Usually, temporary road work should be sent to separate layers, not on OpenStreetMap. There are dedicated tools to take this into account. Thanks and have a nice day!
Tewuzij (2026-07-25 06:17:31+00:00): Thank you so much! By the way, please do not delete place nodes in Quang Ninh
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-07-24 11:56:42+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 164494160, 164494174, 164494194, 164494275, 164494321, 164494362, 164494388, 164494428, 164494448, 164494470, 164494508, 164494537, 164494583, 164494627, 164494680, 164494730, 164494789, 164494845, 164494910, 164494988, 164495165, 164495196, 186222252, 186222828, 186223179, 186224002, 186224149, 186224459, 186225306, 186225400, 186225514, 186225551, 186226036, 186226168, 186226429, 186226628, 186226792, 186227004, 186227115, 186227193, 186227555, 186227841, 186227872, 186227926, 186227986, 186228136, 186228223, 186228260, 186228292, 186228498, 186228569, 186228916, 186229537.
SomeoneElse (2026-07-24 11:59:20+00:00): Note that some of the things changed may both have a valid `name:ca` and a valid `name:es`.  Depending on what is in-use locally, it may be appropriate for some `name` tags to contain both languages (in either order).  

This revert is a status-quo-ante revert of some bad-faith edits - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/151 for detail.

An example of where both names appear to be in use is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243330496/history (see unfortunately not-directly-usable photo at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/151 )

See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21009 and numerous previous blocked sock-puppets by this user in Spain.
teeuwen (2026-07-24 15:30:49+00:00): Hi saruul04,


I noticed your recent changesets contain a lot of deleted features and tags.

To name one example: now deleted way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1011000327 had tags specified for turn:lanes, sidewalk:both, parking:both and lit. This has now been deleted and replaced by https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1544030724, which doesn't contain all these features.

Is there a reason for this?

Also please consider splitting up your changes into smaller changesets with more descriptive descriptions to make the history log easier to follow.


Kind regards,

Bastiaan
bxl-forever (2026-07-24 12:34:14+00:00): Your change has been rejected.
Please do not add addresses to existing objects. OpenStreetMap is a geographical database, the address of any business gets automatically computed by proximity. Duplicate information is not wanted.
LordGarySugar (2026-07-25 20:36:24+00:00): You have created https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21139215 which is a blank type=multipolygon relation, and the ruined building really doesn't need to be a multipolygon.
tms13 (2026-07-26 08:06:40+00:00): Thanks - I've reinstated the lost tags.  The building needed to be polygon as its two outlines are bounds of other polygons.
StC (2026-07-25 09:09:22+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
noahheffron (2026-07-24 23:51:24+00:00): This node, and others recently added nearby, does not exist. Please only add nodes that you have verified on site. Thank you for helping keep OpenStreetMap accurate.
bxl-forever (2026-07-24 12:42:15+00:00): Hello,

Nice try but unfortunately this changeset contains a few errors.

We have a problem with duplicate items. If you trace an area with amenity=parking this is fine 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1544034278 … but then you added an extra node which it itself an amenity=parking glued to it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14045734354
That is incorrect; by doing this, every parking area gets unnecessarily duplicated in statistics and the database sees two items when there is only one.

I saw some beginners believing that they needed this for rendering, but this is not true: a properly-tagged area will get rendered properly, the "P" logo gets created automatically.

Also, the correct way to draw parking areas is as ordinary polygons, which must not be attached to non-routable items such as grass areas. Attaching them to the existing roads is not recommended either, the correct way is to create road connectors to the parking areas, not the opposite.

I will try to fix this.
bxl-forever (2026-07-24 12:45:35+00:00): One more question: did you visit this area prior to drawing it?  I see that all the parking areas you added are marked without any access restriction (i.e., open to everyone), but all the roads here have private access, it is only for staff working at this observatory. So, we’ll probably need to mark those parking areas as private to prevent them from showing up as available places for anyone nearby.

There is no harm in telling us that you are simply drawing an unknown territory from aerial imagery, but at least we’ll know how to fix this.

Thanks again.
teosts (2026-07-24 12:58:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks you for instructions. 
I work there but you're right about private parking. It's a mistake. Sorry
bxl-forever (2026-07-24 13:49:38+00:00): No problem. The map has been fixed now. Thanks for the parking areas, that was a good addition to the map.
bartgron (2026-07-26 21:31:22+00:00): Zmiana została wycofana. Nie korzystamy z Map Google do mapowania w OpenStreetMap.
Pozdrawiam
Kamil Kalata (2026-07-25 11:55:12+00:00): Witaj!
Mam wątpliwości wobec obniżenia kategorii drogi Żyrzyn–Baranów–Michów. Zadałem społeczności pytanie w tej sprawie (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/zglaszanie-i-prosby-o-sprawdzenie-kont-edycji-uzytkownikow/110854/409); jeżeli masz chęć, to możesz się tam wypowiedzieć.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-25 11:58:13+00:00): zmiany kategorii istotnych dróg muszą być najpierw zaproponowane na forum

dodatkowo - co to "PROELDOM Michów"?
none000 (2026-07-28 06:25:48+00:00): PROELDOM Michów to sklep, który nie istnieje od 2 lat.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-29 08:23:37+00:00): co ma on do zmiany kategorii dróg?
none000 (2026-07-29 08:38:03+00:00): Nic nie ma Panie Mateuszu. Nic.
eggie (2026-07-24 13:34:46+00:00): skipper.. een naam doet niets in osm.
Ik heb office=it toegevoegd.
gr eggie
eggie (2026-07-24 13:30:33+00:00): Dag skipper,
Alleen een naam doet niets in OSM.
Geef de aard aan van het bedrijf.
Zie wiki.
De straatnaam zal niet deze naam zijn. Die naam verwijder ik weer.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-24 13:33:01+00:00): amenity=animal_boarding
.. animal_boarding=dog toegevoegd
ftrebien (2026-07-24 15:23:32+00:00): Gostaria de chamar sua atenção para um problema recorrente nas edições de calçadas presentes neste changeset.

As calçadas estão sendo mapeadas em uma única linha com as etiquetas highway=footway + footway=sidewalk + barrier=kerb. Essa combinação representa duas feições físicas lineares distintas na mesma geometria: o eixo da calçada ( highway=footway + footway=sidewalk ) e a borda do meio-fio ( barrier=kerb ).

A documentação descreve barrier=kerb como a linha ao longo do meio-fio, definindo inclusive sua orientação conforme seus lados (o lado baixo e o lado alto), e trata o meio-fio e a calçada como elementos distintos.

Em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Passeios#Passeio_como_linha_separada :

> Adicione um ponto com kerb=* no meio-fio/lancil para auxiliar na navegação em cadeira de rodas.

Na página (em inglês) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier=kerb :

> barrier=kerb is used on a way along the length of the kerb
> The kerb may be mapped separately as a barrier=kerb way.

Em tradução livre:

> barrier=kerb é usado em uma linha ao longo do meio-fio
> O meio-fio pode ser mapeado separadamente como uma linha com barrier=kerb.

Ou seja, a documentação descreve a calçada e o meio-fio como feições distintas, tornando incompatível representá-los na mesma geometria. A separação também está de acordo com o manual de Boas Práticas, que recomenda representar feições distintas como elementos distintos:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3%A1ticas#Uma_caracter%C3%ADstica,_um_elemento_no_OSM

É possível observar essa separação em áreas mapeadas em alto nível de detalhe, como Berlim, Londres e Nova Iorque, onde os meios-fios são representados por linhas distintas.

Esse assunto já havia sido comentado com você anteriormente pelo Telegram, porém as edições continuam sendo realizadas da mesma forma.

Por favor, nas próximas edições, não utilize barrier=kerb na mesma geometria de highway=footway + footway=sidewalk . Caso seja necessário mapear o meio-fio, ele deve ser representado em um elemento separado, ou, quando apropriado, apenas por pontos nas linhas das travessias, conforme a documentação.
eggie (2026-07-24 13:28:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-24 20:13:15+00:00): 1. Вы делаете массовые правки неизмесным приложением. Где обсуждение этого?

2. Каков источник ваших данных?
Robert Whittaker (2026-07-31 08:19:32+00:00): Hi Craghead, could you check the location of the Defibrillator https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14045861247 that you added in this changeset? The defibrillator:location tag says it should be "At the side of path" but you've placed it in the middle of a field.
craghead (2026-07-31 12:16:45+00:00): Hi Robert. Thanks for reminding me to update my additions. Added two AEDs using OSMAND at the the time using my mobile. It sure put them in a strange places! Both amended now.
Robert Whittaker (2026-07-31 08:17:56+00:00): Hi Craghead, could you check the location of the Defibrillator https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14045846970 that you added in this changeset? You appear to have added it in the middle of the sea, about 200m from the shore.
craghead (2026-07-31 12:17:12+00:00): Hi Robert. Thanks for reminding me to update my additions. Added two AEDs using OSMAND at the the time using my mobile. It sure put them in a strange places! Both amended now.
chris66 (2026-07-24 13:52:20+00:00): Allerdings ist der Name "Kaufland" bei Deinem Node nicht in der Standardmap sichbar.
maps4junkies (2026-07-24 14:01:05+00:00): OSM ist eine Geo-Datenbank, keine Karte, auch wenn es gerne so verstanden wird. Das liegt allein an der Darstellung, dass OSM als Karte interpretiert wird, die komplett lesbar sein müsste. Im iD-Editor sind alle Daten erkennbar (auch der Name)  und Kaufland ist auch suchbar.
mw014 (2026-07-25 14:14:34+00:00): Bonjour merci d'avoir signalé ce sens unique 🙂
J'ai apporté quelques correctifs (changeset/186348471) : 
- le plus important -> celui-ci ne concerne qu'une partie de la rue (voir panoramax).
- il ne concerne pas les vélos, on ajoute le tag "oneway:bicycle=no" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Signalisation_routi%C3%A8re_en_France#Panneaux_de_prescription_de_type_B)
Bonne journée
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186296887
jbcharron (2026-07-24 17:29:46+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans la communauté OpenStreetMap
Quelle source de données utilisez-vous pour mettre à jour les commerces ?
Bonne soirée
Jean-Baptiste
bartgron (2026-07-26 21:32:29+00:00): Zestaw zmian jest nieprawidłowy i został wycofany.
Pozdrawiam
Negreheb (2026-07-26 19:28:21+00:00): Das ist ganz bestimmt nicht als Durchfahrtsstraße gedacht, das muss wieder auf residential zurück, ganz klar sogar.
Vektor_567 (2026-07-26 20:36:57+00:00): wurde bereits vor einigen Stunden zurückgesetzt und stattdessen mit Angaben der realen Fahrstreifen umgangen.
Negreheb (2026-07-26 22:46:53+00:00): Ach, sorry, ich hatte nur auf das Changeset geschaut und vergessen nochmal extra die history von dem Weg zu kontrollieren :D (dabei hatte ich sogar in der History markierung, dass das schon zurückgesetzt wurde. Voll übersehen ^^° )
felipeeugenio (2026-07-27 21:01:02+00:00): Hola. Ya no existe el memorial? cual es el motivo de la eliminación?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186297975
NICORSOLE (2026-07-27 21:08:07+00:00): es netamente por que ya había un punto agregado como caleta
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186297975
felipeeugenio (2026-07-27 21:16:11+00:00): Hola. Pero ahora entiendo menos. Puede haber una caleta y un memorial de algo.
En OSM agregamos lo verificable en terreno.
El resto de las cosas que agrega existen en terreno?

saludos
NICORSOLE (2026-07-27 21:21:20+00:00): si todo existe en terreno, el trabajo trata  de sitio patrimonial de la región de índole minero la profesora leticia tiene una pagina donde salen todo estos puntos, en este caso la caleta es el memorial o el sitio histórico, como ya estaba un punto con el nombre preferí ocupar el mismo
felipeeugenio (2026-07-27 21:29:07+00:00): ok, gracias por la aclaración. Pero le pido, por favor, que contacte a la comunidad en el chat en Telegram accesible en el link en mi perfil o consulte la wiki, porque si bien sus ediciones contienen información bastante valiosa, es común tener que hacerle correcciones por errores pequeños y algunos conceptuales. No son graves y la idea es ayudar a quienes comienzan, pero es claro que hay un error de conceptos si acaso la agregó como memorial en primer lugar.
Le agradecemos en todo caso su tiempo y dedicación.

saludos
NICORSOLE (2026-07-27 21:32:19+00:00): entiendo, intentare comunicarme para poder corregir mis errores, disculpa es que no me familiarizo todavia con la plataforma, por tiempos de la universidad recien me estoy aprendiendo
felipeeugenio (2026-07-27 22:46:03+00:00): ok, no te preocupes. lo importante es querer aprender.

saludos
b-holdet (2026-07-26 15:42:12+00:00): Den er allerede på kortet:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9291491198
KronosTheLate (2026-07-27 07:01:32+00:00): Det er riktig, den er bare forkært plassert så. Jeg har fikset det i https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186438972#map=19/56.460631/10.037101. Tak for at du følger godt med!
Kees 59 (2026-07-25 09:03:07+00:00): Naar mijn gevoel is `amenity=dentist`  niet de juiste tagging voor deze POI. Maar omdat ik hier niet heel zeker over ben heb ik een topic aangemaakt op het forum (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/amenity-dentist-of-toch-wat-anders)
ftrebien (2026-07-24 15:38:47+00:00): Este changeset apresenta o mesmo problema comentado no outro changeset: uso de barrier=kerb na mesma geometria de highway=footway + footway=sidewalk. Conforme a documentação, o meio-fio (barrier=kerb) representa uma feição distinta da calçada e deve ser mapeado em elemento separado (ou, quando apropriado, apenas por nós nas travessias). Como estas edições foram realizadas após a conversa que tivemos no Telegram sobre esse assunto, peço novamente que esse padrão não seja utilizado nas próximas contribuições.
CjMalone (2026-07-24 14:42:47+00:00): Sorry
nerihv (2026-07-24 14:46:29+00:00): Faltaba ajustar desplazamiento usando como referencia el camino
Esri es la imagen más reciente 2024. Mapbox la más nítida
Los polígonos estaban sin escuadrar y uno de ellos faltaba diseñar mejor el contorno de la edificación.
nerihv (2026-07-24 14:48:03+00:00): desplazamiento usado esri -0.31, -0.69
bing 2.56, 1.96
mapbox -0.79, -0.85
norgis (2026-07-25 08:27:20+00:00): Please stop removing highway=crossing from intersecting nodes between the footway and ways!
gormur (2026-07-26 15:28:12+00:00): I will continue to do that when adding a fully tagged crossing way as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
felipeeugenio (2026-07-27 21:00:04+00:00): Hola Rodrigo. permissive como acceso significa que si bien el camino es privado, se puede circular libremente sin ningún tipo de restricción ni de control de acceso.
Esa es la realidad en la universidad? solo para chequear.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186300870
Udarian (2026-07-24 15:57:54+00:00): looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
ftrebien (2026-07-24 15:38:25+00:00): Este changeset apresenta o mesmo problema comentado no outro changeset: uso de barrier=kerb na mesma geometria de highway=footway + footway=sidewalk. Conforme a documentação, o meio-fio (barrier=kerb) representa uma feição distinta da calçada e deve ser mapeado em elemento separado (ou, quando apropriado, apenas por nós nas travessias). Como estas edições foram realizadas após a conversa que tivemos no Telegram sobre esse assunto, peço novamente que esse padrão não seja utilizado nas próximas contribuições.
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-24 15:33:57+00:00): Most data consumers and navigation software does make use of street names on sidewalks.  It's generally appreciated when names are included on sidewalks that are part of named streets.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186301876
empty_child (2026-07-26 10:56:38+00:00): Добрый день
Сергей, еще раз прошу, не вешайте place на landuse, если не можете подтвердить границы села

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186392211
evgenykatyshev (2026-07-24 16:41:18+00:00): I reverted it because square aren't closed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186306656
infeeeee (2026-07-28 20:27:29+00:00): Reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186542559
Dhp1367 (2026-07-26 19:45:23+00:00): Tbi
JProuty (2026-07-24 15:55:03+00:00): Newly installed on 7/23/26
nerihv (2026-07-24 16:14:24+00:00): Esri la más actual 
Desplazamiento usado:
esri (2024) -0.81, 0.4
bing -0.39, 0.11
mapbox -0.79, -0.85
moví algunos nodos del camino para que no se crucen al mapear las edificaciones.
eggie (2026-07-24 19:00:57+00:00): Dag pgert.. Beter niet dubbeltaggen. Gebruiks svp alleen de adresnode.
Ik pas even wat aan.

MVG
eggie
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-24 16:35:39+00:00): Pedestrians generally appreciate having street names on sidewalks for the same reason motorists appreciate having street names on both sides of a divided street.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186305301
nerihv (2026-07-24 16:26:43+00:00): esri (2024) -0.81, 0.4 bing -0.39, 0.11 mapbox -0.79, -0.85
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186305380
nerihv (2026-07-24 16:26:51+00:00): esri (2024) -0.81, 0.4 bing -0.39, 0.11 mapbox -0.79, -0.85
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186305422
user_5359 (2026-07-26 11:32:26+00:00): Hello! Please notice you tags
Avoid = sharing nodes between buildings that are not physically connected.
I = also noticed some buildings are mapped inside other buildings. Please ensure each building has its own correct footprint and avoid overlapping building polygons.
Thank = you!
Thanks = for your contributions. I noticed that some of the buildings in this task were not squared. Where appropriate, please use the "Orthogonalize Shape" tool (Q) to square buildings before uploading. This helps improve the quality and consistency of the map.
isn't part of the data, it is part of the change set comment.
nerihv (2026-07-24 16:31:20+00:00): esri (2024) -0.81, 0.4 bing -0.39, 0.11 mapbox -0.79, -0.85
StC (2026-07-25 09:14:25+00:00): Bonjour,
ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
chirping broom (2026-07-25 09:59:59+00:00): Bonjour
Décidément… Je ne comprends vraiment pas. J'ai pourtant bien téléchargé l'entièreté de l'itinéraire… Je n'arrive pas à comprendre ce que je fais mal
Vraiment désolé pour le travail que je vous fais faire ! À votre disposition comme vous voulez pour qu'on en discute
StC (2026-07-25 16:33:24+00:00): Dans ce cas, c'était soit un trou soit un chemin qui avait été prolongé au-delà de sa connexion avec le chemin suivant, je ne sais plus lequel des deux.
Makeena (2026-07-24 17:07:08+00:00): Actual changeset spans South to Manegg
stlmapper74 (2026-07-24 16:40:25+00:00): *Hillsboro Valley Park Road
eggie (2026-07-24 17:32:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Staat hier een bord Verboden Toegang aan het begin met art 461 wvs oid.
Meestral taggen we access=private en als vaak ook access=permissive. Dat heeft als voordeel dat het nog routeert voor depostbode en de bezorgdiensten
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-24 17:36:39+00:00): Wanneer het een Eigen Weg betreft gelden daar andere regels dan bij een art 461 wvs  De tag is dan access=permissive
access=no is meer een gebiedsverbod. Bv voor militair terrein.
eggie (2026-07-24 17:39:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
jb54osm (2026-07-24 20:51:06+00:00): Dag Kvdp,
Ook een welkom van mij. En ook gelijk een opmerking. De foto waarnaar gelinkt wordt lijkt me niet van deze plek. Er loopt geen sloot/water om het clubhuis van de RBL. 
(Ik denk eerder aan de Stompwijkse Vaart o.i.d. voor de foto.)
jb54osm (2026-07-24 20:53:58+00:00): De Zuidbuurtse Watering kan natuurlijk ook, gezien de andere AEDs.
woodpeck (2026-07-24 17:10:03+00:00): Please do NOT tag every individual building with a source tag. This is not how we do it - I am surprised nobody brought that up in the import discussion. Please also link to the import documentation in you changeset comments.
frspp import (2026-07-24 17:21:04+00:00): sorry, did not find this in import guide either. fixed for next batches
shrimp crevette (2026-07-24 17:18:48+00:00): ajout point d'eau
KartKollektor (2026-07-24 21:16:33+00:00): Kartieren von POIs und Micromapping der Hechinger Unterstadt Part 1

Da die POIs bisher extrem mangelhaft und veraltet sind, sind viele neue Einträge involviert, außerdem einige geschlossene Geschäfte entfernt.

(Als Diskussions-Eintrag, da ich leider kein Kommentar zum Changeset hinzufügen konnte, würde mit der EveryDoor-App erstellt)
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-07-24 19:34:25+00:00): Thank you for fixing this loading zone! For the longest time, I had no idea what this was. It's good to see it in its correct form now!
yitimox (2026-07-25 14:36:19+00:00): may I ask why you tagged the sidewalk parallel to "Fatih Sultan Mehmet Bulvarı" at "layer=-1" ?
MS50 (2026-07-25 14:46:55+00:00): It ends underneath the roof of the next to the Ali Kucu mosque, not realising -1 would apply to the entire sidewalk. I made a correction
user_5359 (2026-07-25 12:28:29+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/102613835. What is the mean of the tag  deleteme = yes?
LordGarySugar (2026-07-26 00:06:33+00:00): Naja just a temporary tag I used in josm to keep track of what buildings I needed to correct - I have removed it. Grüße, LGS :)