piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-04 14:20:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4053850987
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8165484812
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8165484813
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10709348790

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mavl (2023-04-23 15:47:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
eggie (2023-03-04 14:41:00+00:00): Hi TheNail... I merged your info with the present addressnode..
Greetz,
eggie
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
eggie (2023-03-04 20:14:13+00:00): Dag tg

Je kunt via het forum van OSM om import vragen vanuit de BAG
Zie https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/554

MVG
eggie
adrianojbr (2023-03-05 21:42:50+00:00): Olá, som-tam!

Nessa região, as imagens da Maxar estão mais atualizadas e melhor alinhadas, com base nos traços Strava.

Além disso, lembro que deve-se evitar alinhar vias exclusivamente com base em imagens de satélite, conforme https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Align_aerial_imagery_before_tracing.

Abraço!
som-tam (2023-03-06 07:53:10+00:00): Oi Adrian,

Obrigado por seu feedback. Eu não sabia sobre as imagens Maxar. Em breve vou reajustar minhas mudanças com Maxar.
adrianojbr (2023-03-06 21:38:29+00:00): Ah, complementando, é possível adicionar os traços Strava com mais qualidade, conforme https://erickdeoliveiraleal.medium.com/tutorial-strava-openstreetmap-josm-or-id-2e2003f4aea3

Cabe lembrar que é o registro principalmente de ciclistas e pedestres, então tem que ter atenção ao mapear as vias por essa camada. Mas, sem dúvidas, são ótimos para conferir o alinhamento das imagens de satélite.

Abraço!
som-tam (2023-03-07 12:46:38+00:00): Essa é uma grande idéia. Ainda não tenho uma conta strava, mas vou criar uma para testar este recurso. Também pode revelar alguns caminhos adicionais na área. Obrigado.
Frans S (2023-03-04 15:07:18+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings need to be mapped more accurate and squared.
Do not connect nodes of buildings to each other,
Nearly each building shows wrong mapping 
I removed them because it takes more time to adjust each of them, rather than map them all over again.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133292901
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Frans S (2023-03-04 15:08:59+00:00): Hello. See my comment on another changeset.
Sloppy mapped.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133293366
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
user_5359 (2023-03-29 13:21:37+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte übermale vorhandene Wege nicht einfach sondern ändere den Wegtyp entsprechend der Verwendung.
infeeeee (2023-03-06 15:42:43+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

A szerkesztésed jó, azért írok mert bepipáltad, hogy valaki nézze át. Egy apróság, az üzleteket nem az épület határárvonalára szoktuk rakni, hanem kicsit beljebb, de ez annyira nem lényeges. 

Ha további kérdéseid lennének, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/K%C3%B6z%C3%B6ss%C3%A9g

További jó térképezést!
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 16:44:17+00:00): fixed "Бульвар" -> "бульвар" naming convention
canfe (2023-03-06 18:00:14+00:00): In genere viene detto di non mettere i nomi in maiuscolo.
Anche su wikipedia è scritto con solo la prima maiuscola e non tutte.
Io lascerei Penny
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133296783
MarinoBM (2023-03-09 12:22:11+00:00): Hola Yéremy. ¿Estás seguro de la existencia de este edificio?. En las imágenes aéreas se ve una zona boscosa sin ninguna edificación y el nombre suena a "cuento".
Un saludo.
Frans S (2023-03-08 11:52:46+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
Please do not cluster buildings.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133297006
Frans S (2023-03-08 12:00:58+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133297006
Frans S (2023-03-08 12:00:59+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133297006
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-04 19:45:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted because it contains a number of errors.   The name tag is for official names only.
Members of a relation don't need tags. Those steps seem unlikely.
Please only use established tags.
Junction:ref tag shouldn't be used for notes.
Larmax (2023-03-05 12:17:45+00:00): Moi, tarvitsevatko noin pienet lammet, kuten tämä https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1151260300 lähes 200 nodea? Tämä vaikeuttaa turhaan niiden muokkaamista ja maastotietokannan data ei todellisuudessa ole noin tarkkaa. + Josmissa muuten on toiminto, jolla voi pelkistää polygoneja (shift+y)
posiki (2023-03-05 13:11:24+00:00): Jeps, voin niitä kyllä yleistää.
archie (2024-03-12 18:27:15+00:00): Hej, du har även i det här cs ritat in några järnvägsspår som inte längre finns.
Den här bron där järnvägsspåret gick över innan det revs  (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1151260552) är jag tämligen säker på att den inte finns i verkligheten. 
Vänligen uppge varför du ritar in en nu inte existerande bro, eller upplys mig om att jag har helt fel på den punkten, tack.
Msiipola (2024-09-27 15:09:56+00:00): Hej! I detta område har du adderat ett antal building=ruins.
Finns det spår av dessa kvar synliga i terrängen?
Frans S (2023-03-08 12:07:31+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings need to be tagged as building=yes.
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133297552
Frans S (2023-03-08 12:07:33+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings need to be tagged as building=yes.
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133297552
Frans S (2023-03-08 12:03:21+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please read the paragraph about mapping/tagging of tracks. Local tracks are not needed to map.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133298154
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 17:02:59+00:00): changed "Балка" -> "балка"
josantgl (2023-03-04 17:05:16+00:00): #ODMX
MxxCon (2023-03-06 08:35:33+00:00): Hello.
What is the source of this data?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133298975
tordans (2023-03-09 19:16:44+00:00): Wollte gerade einen Note erstellen, dass man hier mal schauen muss basierend auf https://twitter.com/vanzoe8/status/1631229459658424323 :-D.

Nice!
Supaplex030 (2023-03-09 21:02:51+00:00): Ah – danke für die Bestätigung – als ich da neulich vorbeikam, waren nämlich auf der einen Straßenseite nur Bohrlöcher für die Bügel im Asphalt und ich habe aus der Anzahl der Löcher auf die capacity geschlossen :D
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 17:27:38+00:00): Балка -> балка
MxxCon (2023-03-06 08:36:10+00:00): Hello.
What is the source of this data?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133299329
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 17:35:16+00:00): "Бульв." -> "бульв."
cyton (2023-03-05 10:51:50+00:00): Ich hab nicht ohne Grund concrete:plates anstatt concrete als surface genommen, laut https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/85524/concrete-vs-concreteplates sind das hier einzelne Platten, und überall sind (Dehnungs-) Fugen zu sehen und zu spüren beim Befahren.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133299594
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 17:38:36+00:00): "Бул." -> "бул."
silversurfer83 (2023-03-06 09:04:59+00:00): Moin Manfred,

Dein Änderungskommentar ist leider nicht sehr hilfreich. Vielleicht hast du mal Zeit und liest dir diesen Wikiartikel durch :)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133299786
marnfredklein (2023-03-07 11:18:58+00:00): Vielen Dank für Deinen Hinweise und deine Verbesserungen. Ich werde mein(e) Änderungskommentar(e) zukünftig geeigneter wählen. 
VG
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133299786
silversurfer83 (2023-03-07 12:11:40+00:00): Hallo Manfred,

Danke :)

Alles Gute
Silversurfer83
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 17:43:50+00:00): Болото - болото
~Jhellico (2023-03-04 20:13:13+00:00): r12202672: тут "Болото" - власна назва
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 22:54:53+00:00): виправив
GinaroZ (2023-03-06 17:23:06+00:00): Think I added this name as it is shown in OS streetview...
andrum99 (2023-03-06 17:29:57+00:00): Sorry - I assumed this was a mistake. It does indeed say 'Craigwell Path' on the OS map layer. I've added it back. Should the dividing line between 'Craigwell Path' and 'Main Road' be moved so it coincides with the junction of Farm Road? OS Map data seems to be inconclusive.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-04 17:50:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4666928866

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 17:46:02+00:00): Б/в - б/в
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 17:49:12+00:00): Б/о - б/о
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 17:52:54+00:00): Бухта - бухта
darkonus (2023-03-05 12:22:01+00:00): слово «Вулиця» також виправте, будь ласка https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133231129
avinet_ua (2023-03-05 23:05:47+00:00): виправив усі написання вулиць які починалися з великої літери

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133342938
Aleks-Berlin (2023-03-17 10:24:11+00:00): Hi ZuquetuPlexis,
I work here and I dont understand your changes. Why you removed the building-tags of buildings? Why you add college tags to them? There is 1 college "TH Wildau" and it is made of many buildings (some called Haus some Halle). If something is made of stone and has windows, and is made for people.
I read OSM wiki here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
1. "Haus 13" = building office,
2. Haus15 + Halle* = building=college, cite from wiki "Use amenity=college on the whole college area to represent the college as an institution." (this is meant once for the area) see wiki below.
Also here it is clearly mentioned!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dcollege
As we rely on these data and have software based on official OSM-wiki, I need to change this back soon.
Please comment on this.
Kind regards, A.
ZuquetuPlexis (2023-03-17 11:55:38+00:00): Hi, i made some changes through the german version of the osm-id-editor. I think those errors where made because of the german interface and me not double checking. Sorry for disturbuing your work. I try to correct the errors today.
ZuquetuPlexis (2023-03-17 21:54:55+00:00): Hello again, i am not entiery sure what exact changes to make. I would like to ask you to revert my changes, as i still lack some experience with this matter. Do you know of ressources (links, docs, etc.) you would recommend me to look at to avoid similar mistakes?
Aleks-Berlin (2023-03-19 09:58:48+00:00): Hi ZP, a good source is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/
for every official tag, should be an docu there. I always google e.g. "osm tag highway".
I fixed the buildings for this area.
if you have further questions, just ask.
regards, Alex
user_3022894 (2023-06-25 15:33:20+00:00): Hi hpduwe,

ich melde mich wegen einer Kleinigkeit bei dir, und zwar geht es dabei um die Umrisse dieser Brücke hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1151275619/history

Dazu wollte ich nur sagen: Du hast die Brückenfläche hier gemäß ALKIS eingezeichnet, das habe ich gesehen. Ehrlich gesagt halte ich die ALKIS-Daten an dieser Stelle allerdings für nicht ganz korrekt. 

Wenn ich mir die Luftbilder anschaue, dann beginnt die Brückenfläche eigentlich nicht genau an der Gewässergrenze zum Fluss hin, sondern ein Stückchen davor / dahinter. Es ist ja erkennbar, wo die Fachwerktröge beginnen.

Normalerweise sind die ALKIS-Daten gut, an dieser Stelle fiel mir jedoch auf, dass sie irgendwie von der Realität leicht abzuweichen scheinen.

Zumal unter der Brücke auch noch im Norden und im Süden jeweils ein unbefestigter kleiner Wirtschaftsweg drunter herführt, die - nach aktuellem Stand der OSM-Daten - gar nicht unterhalb der Brückenfläche liegen würden.

Wäre es daher für dich in Ordnung, wenn ich die Brücke etwas nach Norden und nach Süden hin verlängere? 
Ich wollte dir nur vorher kurz Bescheid geben.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
user_593899 (2023-06-25 16:16:34+00:00): Hi Lukas, du hast recht die Brücke ist ein ganzes Stück länger! Wenn du das änderst ist das ok. Eine Info hätte mir aber gereicht. Um Erlaubnis fragen musst du nicht, es gibt so viele Daten in der Karte die über die Zeit immer wieder angepasst werden müssen, das wäre einfach unpraktisch für die Kartierer. 
Gruß Peter
user_3022894 (2023-07-23 20:32:17+00:00): Hi Peter,

alles klar, danke dir! :D
maraf24 (2023-03-11 09:50:49+00:00): Błędne użycie tagu name, brak źródeł.
Wycofane.
mavl (2023-03-26 14:57:08+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удаляет лес. Пакет правок отменён.
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-05 05:15:34+00:00): Please do not add descriptive names to the map when they aren't the real name of the item, or anything beyond just a description of the feature.
jmarchon (2023-03-05 06:13:43+00:00): Nice work!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133301526
felipeeugenio (2023-03-05 00:22:14+00:00): Hola Bruno. Agregaste un secondary que en verdad es un secondary_link, pero lo agregaste con access=no. No se va a poder circular por ahí. Es eso lo que intentaste hacer?
felipeeugenio (2023-03-05 00:23:43+00:00): Hay una prohibición de virar en U en una calle en si misma. Te hablo por el chat mejor
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-07 19:37:17+00:00): wysokość to raczej w height (plus to ze znaku było więc na drogę przeniosę)

ale dzięki za zmotywowanie do przerobienia notek!
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-04-22 14:02:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135228709, 135225625 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to fictional edits.
jpennycook (2023-03-04 18:34:06+00:00): full changeset comment was truncated, should have ended "split separate industrial areas"
jpennycook (2023-03-04 18:35:33+00:00): Note that I am the source of the Mapillary footage around the crossings.
Regarding Boulton Road roundabout exit edit: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#The_roundabout_itself "Do not directly connect approaching with departing roads. 

Roundabout with correct connections
Each way which intersects with the roundabout should be connected to it with a separate node. Two ways which enter and exit a roundabout should never connect to the same node on the roundabout. This is required to allow routing applications and software to provide correct directions, otherwise the routing software will not correctly recognise the roundabout. With a segment of the roundabout between the entrance and exit, routers can safely recognise that a section of the roundabout has to be driven through."
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-04-22 14:02:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135228709, 135225625 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to fictional edits.