piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
M!dgard (2025-03-14 11:11:12+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Building_and_address_import (this is the Wallonia part).

Technically the import procedure for Wallonia hasn't been followed yet but, since it's just the same as the Flemish import, there is informal consensus on this within Belgium (or within the OSM.be local chapter's community channels at least). Several mappers have introduced thousands of buildings and addresses using this tool in the last 2 years, with no-one complaining up till now as far as I'm aware. I suppose it slipped our collective mind to complete the procedure. We're making plans to work on that now.

In the OSM.be chat, Le_Sharkoïste asked for help dealing with this matter, which is very sternly worded indeed. They report not remembering any past warnings, and I don't see any public warnings either (at least leaving a changeset comment is usual for this kind of matter), were those sent via PM?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-14 23:37:18+00:00): Thank you, that was all that was needed! Discussions happened via e-mail, directly to & from the DWG, over a period of ~3 weeks, during which they were asked twice for that info.
eggie (2025-03-14 06:13:52+00:00): Hi.. In the Netherlands we use the addressnode to tag on. Not the buildingshape.

Greetz..
eggie
NeisBot (2025-03-13 23:30:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
Cactus Grosshandel Singen (2025-03-13 23:58:55+00:00): New business added.
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-14 05:57:12+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163596776
Baloo Uriza (2025-03-14 13:11:09+00:00): Adding shop=vacant when a business moves out will highlight the location in StreetComplete so the next tenant can be more easily surveyed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163592200
NeisBot (2025-03-14 05:12:53+00:00): Hi Mario Endrigo ramos, and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

Over the past 7 days, you've made more than 100 changesets without adding any comment.

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment
aharvey (2025-03-14 04:32:14+00:00): I couldn't see anything attached to it, so have deleted the duplicate.
rskedgell (2025-03-14 07:10:13+00:00): Thanks. I'm reasonably sure that the crossings here have been upgraded from pelican to toucan since the last Bing street side image capture. I've added a note for confirmation, which will hopefully be resolved by one of the local mappers before my next visit.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4663679
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-16 09:45:25+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
Jordi MF (2025-03-14 18:33:09+00:00): Hola adrian,

En OSM usamos el criterio de oficialidad y Alicante forma parte de la zona de predominio lingüístico valenciano según la Ley 4/1983, por lo que su toponimia se escribe en valenciano según la toponimia oficial publicada por el Instituto Cartogràfic Valencià i la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua (ver Ley 2/2020 de la Generalitat, artículo 45).

Por lo tanto, debemos de seguir ese criterio de oficialidad.
Jordi MF (2025-03-14 18:34:31+00:00): Estos cambios son incorrectos, po tanto deberían de ser restituídos. Puedes añadir la etiqueta name:es para añadir cómo se llama en castellano cualquier topónimos que esté en uso.

Saludos.
Jordi MF (2025-03-14 18:37:54+00:00): Además, estás confundiendo barrios con (neighbourhood) con localizaciones no habitadas (locality). Por ejemplo, has mapeado el barrio "Diputació" por una partida (locality) denominada Diputación Provincial de Alicante, lo cual es incorrecto.

Son muchos errores que deberán de corregirse. Por otra parte, estaría bien que participases en todos los comentarios que se han hecho en tus conjuntos de cambios: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=21808597

Saludos
Srdjan023 (2025-03-14 18:07:36+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap! Your edits help make the map more accurate and useful for everyone. Keep up the great work! 😊🌍
AngocA (2025-05-28 02:31:02+00:00): Hi Stu. 

Thank you for improving rivers in Colombia. One comment, any branch on a river should follow the same direction of the main stream - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1367208666/history
Littlebtc (2025-04-23 18:33:41+00:00): 崙雅巷有接回去嗎？我當初東彰北路通車後巡過應該是被切斷的？
Littlebtc (2025-04-23 18:37:06+00:00): 我說這條 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1355413639
Littlebtc (2025-04-23 18:43:19+00:00): Mapillary 在一月底的時候是不通的，開給工廠的新通道有把舊路圍掉
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=23.95333439999996&lng=120.59069539999996&z=19.81464262085604&pKey=1617428318894243&focus=photo&x=0.7949270103170333&y=0.442916514492817&zoom=0
ieguy (2025-03-14 02:44:16+00:00): i deleted the shrubs because they are gone
CurlingMan13 (2025-03-15 17:59:24+00:00): Changeset reverted/fixed

Please use the proper tags of:
man_made=geoglyph
CurlingMan13 (2025-03-15 17:57:19+00:00): My eyes might be deceiving men, but I don't see any water near here.  This should not be tagged with random tags for whatever you are trying to do.

Fixed.
CurlingMan13 (2025-03-15 17:55:13+00:00): This is not a traffic calming table...

Please stop mapping things with random tags.

I have fixed this for you
CurlingMan13 (2025-03-14 05:23:24+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM!  I wanted to drop a note.  The correct tag for letters on a mountain is:

man_made=geoglyph

You can read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dgeoglyph

Additionally, it shouldn't be name=T, but instead, it should be inscription=T.  The art is the letter T, which is an inscription, not the actual name.
CurlingMan13 (2025-03-15 17:52:51+00:00): As stated before, please use the right tags.

This is not a natural saddle.

correct tags are

man_made=geoglyph
inscription=B
CurlingMan13 (2025-03-15 17:51:58+00:00): Changeset fixed...
CurlingMan13 (2025-03-14 05:28:23+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM! I wanted to drop a note. The correct tag for letters on a mountain is:

man_made=geoglyph

You can read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dgeoglyph

Also, make sure you follow the one thing, one feature policy on OSM.  You created a node and a relation/way for the same feature.  Only one should exist.  Also, they should not be named, and the elevation certainly isn't 7m above sea level.  Elevation tag should be corrected or removed.
CurlingMan13 (2025-03-14 05:26:10+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM! I wanted to drop a note. The correct tag for letters on a mountain is:

man_made=geoglyph

You can read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dgeoglyph

Additionally, it shouldn't be name=E, but instead, it should be inscription=E. The art is the letter E, which is an inscription, not the actual name.

You also mapped this as a line, you could make it an area.  Name needs to be removed.
CurlingMan13 (2025-03-14 05:24:39+00:00): What do you mean by "its not there" in the fixme=* ?
evdence (2025-03-14 06:20:14+00:00): judging by aerial, i wouldnt classify this as a thing to map
NeisRevert (2025-03-14 06:26:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163597266 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove testdata
CurlingMan13 (2025-03-15 17:46:07+00:00): It should be

man_made=geoglyph

This isn't how you map it.
NeisRevert (2025-03-14 06:45:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163597542 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove testdata
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-14 05:05:35+00:00): cycleway lanes added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163596089
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-14 05:40:27+00:00): and also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163596516
julcnx (2025-03-14 12:26:58+00:00): Hi Michael,  

Thanks for your contributions! You may have noticed that I updated the highway classification and permissions. Are you familiar with OpenStreetMap tagging conventions? Permissions are typically based on signage and legal aspects rather than physical characteristics.  

If you'd like to recommend this track for walking, consider using `sac_scale=strolling` or `sac_scale=hiking`.  

You can find more details here:  
🔗 [Highway Tagging](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway)  
🔗 [SAC Scale](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sac_scale)  
🔗 [OSM Thailand Project](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand)  

Let me know if you have any questions!  

Cheers,  
Julien
Michael Medley (2025-03-15 01:50:48+00:00): Hi Julien. Thank you! As you will have guessed, I am rather new to editing OpenStreetMap, and have a lot to learn. Your comments help me improve. Does "cnx" in your handle mean you are particularly interested in Chiang Mai area? I hike regularly around here and am hoping often to edit OpenStreetMap on the basis of my hiking experiences. Do feel free to comment any time.
Best wishes - Michael
julcnx (2025-03-15 10:10:10+00:00): Hi Michael, that sounds great! I’m based in Chiang Mai, though I’m more into off-road motorcycling than hiking. I’ve been improving and maintaining OpenStreetMap in Chiang Mai for the past four years and regularly contribute to mapping tools and wikis for Thailand and beyond.  

You might find this hiking guide helpful for mapping in Thailand—it includes useful links to local hiking and OpenStreetMap communities:  
[WikiProject Thailand/Hiking Guide](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand/Hiking_Guide)  

Visual examples will be added in the near future.  
Happy hiking and mapping!
qugeb (2026-06-24 18:06:13+00:00): Hi, 
kleiner Hinweis auf diesen Hinweis. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5331120
Genau den Weg hattest du ja in diesem Changeset als disused: markiert. Weisst du mehr dazu?
reigi (2026-06-25 08:04:54+00:00): Hallo qugeb, ich kenne die derzeitige Situation vor Ort nicht. Meine Überlegungen damals könnte gewesen sein, dass das Tagging darauf hinweist, dass der Weg sowieso als access = no und foot als privat ausgezeichnet war und somit nicht von allgemeinem Interesse war und ich den Weg lieber auf  disused gesetzt habe. Außerdem heisst access=no, dass keiner den Weg betreten darf. Siehe dazu auch den Wiki-Artikel https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:foot%3Dprivate. Insgesamt machte das tagging einen etwas "unausgewogenen" Sinn auf mich.
lakedistrict (2025-03-16 23:29:33+00:00): Hi, thanks for your recent edits. You have added a hotel area which includes an existing hotel, the Burn How Hotel. Is this now known as Burn How Garden Hotel, or are they separate hotels? Thanks :)
fdpotato (2025-03-17 02:58:36+00:00): Yes, they are the same hotel, and Burn How Garden Hotel is the current name when I visited the hotel last year.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-04 01:21:03+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality mapping from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167156814
tuan_gsm (2025-03-24 04:34:39+00:00): Đường này chưa xây dựng sao bạn xóa highway=construction vậy?
Patr1k_P (2025-03-22 16:00:55+00:00): podla sat. snimok menite path na cycleway alebo tam je realne znacka pre cyklochodnik?
GerdP (2025-03-16 11:21:04+00:00): Zahlendreher: Radtour am 13.3.
GerdP (2025-03-16 11:22:18+00:00): Zahlendreher: Radtour am 13.3.
s777n (2025-03-18 08:41:46+00:00): Вы добавили шахматную школу как продуктовый магазин. Исправлено
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-14 08:33:46+00:00): Reverted
Please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571 and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Mexico before editing the name of this feature.
SekeRob (2025-03-18 09:08:52+00:00): Hi,

Hate to disappoint you about that Straight Only sign you entered as a turn restriction. It's signed absolutely everywhere here in Italy, in the majority of cases only to indicate that there's a forward only at the next sidestreet/T junction. We don't map them since routers know you cant turn into that side street following either to left or right and continue your travels on. Would we map these superfluous restrictions, there'd be tens if not hundreds of thousands to map in Italy based on this sign... they work as a pre-advise as in the next street you can't continue thru, In fact here the rail work traffic can make a left coming from the SE.

As I pass that street about once a week, it's not the correct sign, road managers are not perfect, it should have been IT:II.311, literally "Preavviso di strada senza uscita (Pre-advise, no exit"). It ends at the construction site gate. Construction traffic can make a left coming from the SE.

VV your CS edit set link, seeing you mapping all over Europe and elsewhere in little blips, do you know all the local laws, regulations and practices of all these countries? I don't and therefor abstain from going into traffic routing coding abroad.

happy mapping
cheers
GerdP (2025-03-16 11:22:28+00:00): Zahlendreher: Radtour am 13.3.
GerdP (2025-03-16 11:21:23+00:00): Zahlendreher: Radtour am 13.3.
Frans S (2025-03-18 15:53:23+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please solve the issues shown by the issues triangle before your upload your mappings. 
Improve your knowledge about how to tag highways,

Check these webpages
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
This is about Tanzania but also valid here
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SxLkCU3IRecsFV2kYx61VImJLLtQiKw3/view?pli=1
When a road or river continues on an adjacent task, please map that trace a bit over the edge of your task. Another mapper can then continue mapping. When you stop before the edge, The mapped trace will not be visible for the other mapper.

Best regards
angelamoran (2025-03-21 07:36:33+00:00): Hello, thanks for your feedback and very helpful guidance. I will do better in my next mapping.

Warm regards
Syl (2025-03-14 08:47:17+00:00): Bonjour, un des chemins n'a pas d'attribut : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1367274331
schabanel (2025-03-14 08:52:38+00:00): Salut Syl, exact, corrigé !
Marek-M (2025-03-14 09:49:40+00:00): Czy na tych drogach są ustawione zakazy ruchu pieszych?
stasiu512 (2025-03-14 15:30:15+00:00): Cześć, proszę nie cofaj moich zmian dotyczączych usunięcia foot=no w okolicach al. Płażyńskiego, nie ma znaków w terenie, od strony Płażyńskiego można wejść legalnie fo tunelu, więc teoretycznie tunel nie powinien być motorroad=yes. Napisałem wiele pism do prezydent i to zarządu, zgłaszałem w aplikacji GCK, jednak do dzisiaj włącznie brak efektów. 
Zmiana z tego co widzę jest cała do revertu, w żadnym z tych miejsc nie stoją znaki zakazujące ruch pieszy.
stasiu512 (2025-03-28 14:27:25+00:00): Wracając do tematu dostałem w końcu odpowiedź od BZRD i mój wniosek dotyczący uporządkowania oznakowania wzdłuż al. Płażyńskiego został przyjęty do realizacji. Czekam na efekty i wtedy faktycznie będzie można wprowadzić foot=no i bicycle=yes w odpowiednich miejscach.
Marek-M (2025-03-28 15:55:04+00:00): Super! Dobra robota :) 👋
大山かなめ (2025-03-14 07:58:42+00:00): 前の編集者さんがnoteタグを付けていたことがきっかけで気づきました。ありがとうございます。
domiden (2025-03-14 08:09:45+00:00): Should be: “… ("Kassel-Vorderer Westen").”
BAGgeraar (2025-05-28 14:28:37+00:00): Bij deze wijzigingen heb je de rotonde aangepast van highway=primary naar highway=trunk/motorroad=no. Waarom heb je dit gedaan? Naar mijn idee is primary namelijk correct, omdat de rotonde geen verbinding vormt met een andere auto(snel)weg.
Tjuro (2025-05-28 14:39:25+00:00): Beste BAGgeraar,

Ik heb van deze rotonde highway=trunk gemaakt omdat een van de takken een autoweg is. Highway=trunk is hogerige classificate dan highway=primary.

Bij rotondes dient de hoogste classificatie van alle takken toegepast te worden. Naar mijn idee hoort highway=trunk hier ook bij.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
BAGgeraar (2025-06-06 05:59:47+00:00): Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tagging_van_Nederlandse_wegen
Hier wordt aangegeven dat het alleen correct is wanneer de rotonde een autoweg met een autoweg verbindt. In dit geval is het een verbinding tussen primary, met een autoweg die hier ook begint/eindigt (maar dus geen verbinding).
BAGgeraar (2025-06-06 06:53:47+00:00): Vergelijkbare situatie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/52.525484/6.393448
Tjuro (2025-06-06 07:10:54+00:00): De wiki is ook maar een richtlijn, recent is de consensus wel veranderend naar dat highway=trunk niet altijd volledig overeen komt met autoweg,

Het gegeven voorbeeld was één van de situaties waar ik het nog niet aangepast heb. in de rest van Nederland heb ik dat wel gedaan zoals:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.505893/5.726618
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.537849/5.739198

Andere voorbeelden waarvan het al jaren goed staat is onder andere:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=52.5480184&mlon=5.53698#map=17/52.547848/5.531359

Naar mijn mening is het belangrijk dat de Nederlandse wegen voldoen aan de osm classificatie regels.

Ik stel voor dat als je het hier niet mee eens bent dat je dit op het forum bespreekt.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-07 06:38:49+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164618287
Kento Kei (2025-03-14 08:13:31+00:00): foot*
not food
GuyFrom2007 (2025-03-14 12:41:27+00:00): Du hast hier anscheinend beim Eintragen der Landuses einen Multipolygonfehler (Wald) verursacht.
StVeit_Maps (2025-03-14 14:05:13+00:00): Danke für die Info schau ich mir nochmal an
GuyFrom2007 (2025-03-14 22:18:30+00:00): Alles klar, ich habe ihn schon selber behoben.
StVeit_Maps (2025-03-15 13:19:12+00:00): Danke 😅
tux67 (2025-03-14 09:02:12+00:00): Hallo JannikHeyderhoff,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, dass du mithelfen möchtest, die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Wenn da ein Pavillion steht - gibt's einen besonderen Grund den Eintrag zu löschen? Zur Info - der Umriss kommt ursprünglich aus dem Geoportal NRW.

Prima, dass du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56

Für eine Qualitätssicherung, an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163599741
JannikHeyderhoff (2025-03-14 09:26:37+00:00): Da stand damals ein Gartenhaus als es sich noch um eine Altenheim gehandelt hat. wurde aber schon vor Jahren abgerissen.
Vielen Dank für die schnelle Antwort. Ich werde mich dann einfach an das Katasteramt wenden in Heinsberg.
tux67 (2025-03-14 09:55:17+00:00): ok, ich habe das Gartenhaus als abgerissen wieder eingetragen (erscheint nicht auf der Karte), damit kein anderer Mapper das aufgrund der ALKIS Daten wieder einträgt.
Selbst wenn der Kreis Heinsberg das zeitnah aktualisiert (oder schon hat) - der Abgleich mit dem NRW ALKIS ist immer in weiteren zeitlichen Abständen.
Gruß
tux67
wolfgang8 (2025-04-24 13:34:34+00:00): Hallo MaraAT,

ich hab bemerkt, dass du in der Gegend viele Weingärten (landuse=vineyard) mit Namen (häufig dieselben für verschiedene Polygone) eingetragen hast.

Ich vermute, dass es sich dabei um Riednamen handelt. Die Namen solcher Lokalitäten werden in OSM üblicherweise nur einmal mit place=locality erfasst und nicht bei jedem einzelnen Objekt, das zu dieser Lokalität gehört (z.B. Weingärten, Wege, Grasflächen, Gebüsche,...).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:place%3Dlocality
PPete2 (2025-04-30 15:48:32+00:00): Hallo, bitte um Beteiligung in der Forums-Diskussion zu deinen Änderungen in Weinbaugebieten, danke:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vandalismus-berreich-wagram-no-nahe-krems/129290
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 11:06:05+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163599784
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 11:17:29+00:00): Fatto revert.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163605608
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 11:06:09+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163600015
mavl (2025-05-13 15:02:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 11:06:13+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163600123
Henry572 (2025-03-14 08:34:41+00:00): Laut https://www.haan.de/Stadt-Rathaus/Stadt/Aktuelles/Informationen-zur-Sanierung-der-L357.php?object=tx,3431.5.1&ModID=7&FID=3431.2588.1&NavID=3431.46&La=1 ist das der 10. Bauabschnitt; als ich da war, war auch schon auf dem 11. Abschnitt die untere Asphaltschicht hergestellt (eine kommt noch oben drauf), sodass die Baustelle wohl bald fertig sein wird.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-14 08:37:22+00:00): Please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571 and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Mexico before editing the name of this feature.
habi (2025-03-14 08:37:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163600247
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 11:06:18+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163600487
maro21 (2025-03-17 20:44:18+00:00): Proszę podawaj dokładniejsze opisy zmian. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
grzegorz75jan (2025-03-17 21:47:26+00:00): Nie rób tego. Takie stałe opisy to stabilność i "minor changes" to już umiem po angielsku a tak to bym musiał znowu w translator wrzucać. To Miło z jego strony jak i wielu mu podobnych i tak światowo, fachowo brzmi a nie jakieś pospolite aktualizacja czy drobne poprawki.

W sumie masz większą cyfrę edycji to możesz mu przyłożyć bo u mnie mizeria i mnie zje.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-03-14 18:34:25+00:00): Merhaba. Ankara Eczacılar Odası'nın genel ağ sayfasında Kırkkonaklar Mah. 450. Cad. No:72/A Çankaya/ANKARA adresinde Kırmızı Eczanesi çıkıyor.

Bu eczaneyi yanlışlıkla mı OpenStreetMap'ten sildiniz?
miskinkedi (2025-03-15 12:42:15+00:00): Evet yanlışlıkla silmişim gibi görünüyor...
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 11:06:22+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163601152
SomeoneElse2 (2025-04-15 23:58:04+00:00): What sort of building is a "seb"?  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1367284049 .
ruph (2025-04-16 07:32:00+00:00): I appreciate your hint. The values have now been corrected accordingly.