piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Dimitar155 (2025-07-12 05:50:19+00:00): Здравей, incline=down на https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288878282 си е напълно коректен таг. Все пак има значителен наклон. По едно време искаха да правят и стълби, но май са стигнали до под кривата круша с този проект.
Fraxi (2025-07-12 07:41:06+00:00): Има наклон, и аз съм слизал по тази пътечка.
NeisBot (2025-07-11 13:17:17+00:00): Hi Pritee02AshokHalder, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added a shrub feature to the map."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
user_5359 (2025-07-12 10:07:27+00:00): Hello! Wikipedia has his own language translation. You don't need to mention every language in the Wikipedia article!
あじさか (2025-07-12 11:00:58+00:00): Thank you for the comment!
Understood. I’ll keep only the main Wikipedia tag and remove the other language tags.
wolfgang8 (2025-07-15 04:03:08+00:00): Hallo, die Dreifaltigkeitssäule erinnert an die Verschonung von der Pest im Jahr 1713. Als Kriegerdenkmal würde ich sie eher nicht einstufen.

https://www.marterl.at/suche/detail?oid=6997
DerKaiserschmarren (2025-07-15 06:41:26+00:00): Danke. In SCEE gibt es diese Option anscheinend nicht, deshalb habe ich den nähersten Tag dran genommen. Jetzt weiß ich, dass die Option dafür fehlt

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168947232
SekeRob (2025-07-13 07:46:57+00:00): Hi Nicola and welcome to OSM.

Note the warnings in your edit set "warnings:impossible_oneway:highway" & "warnings:outdated_tags:incomplete_tags". You've created impossible routing for vehicles with a smalll driveway at the end... you can get in, but not out. 

Also please explain the deletion of this way.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/210296660
It exists, however it may appear to you, people use it as a shortcut.

Anyway, I've restored to path/access way to houses and removed the oneway tag.

Let me know
cheers
marc__marc (2026-02-20 12:29:18+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1414078823
what's a portable heating in a events_venue ?
I also notice an erreor building>building:part
and location outdoor for a building seems also strange

Regards,
Marc
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-29 15:48:51+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12994270570/history has fixme:type = gate that was added in this edit
Would it be barrier=gate ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dgate )
Something else?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-29 15:49:45+00:00): also, gate seems mapped already - right?
YomanNH (2025-07-14 08:45:21+00:00): Cześć, rzeczywiście jest tu znak, który uzasadniałby dodanie bicycle=designated? A jeśli jest, to jaki? Bo highway=footway + bicycle=designated wygląda jak mapowanie niezgodne z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w
YomanNH (2025-07-18 06:41:06+00:00): Dziękuję za zignorowanie mojego komentarza. Poprawiłem fikcję, którą stworzyłeś w tym i innych zestawach zmian w okolicy.
habi (2025-07-17 10:18:46+00:00): Hey Joe
It's not necessary to 'spam' the changeset comments with SEO optimized text.
Other OSM editors just want to know what you did :)
habi (2025-07-17 10:21:38+00:00): You've removed the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193842975 from the map here by changing it from 'building=yes` to 'area=yes`.
I've corrected this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169053751
habi (2025-07-17 10:23:34+00:00): Hey, und eigentlich kann ich wohl auch auf Deutsch schreiben :)
Zusätzlich zum generellen `shop=repair` könntest du vielleicht noch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Amobile_phone%3Arepair hinzufügen.

Gruss aus Bern,
habi
somehundred (2025-07-11 14:35:07+00:00): Jūs aizmirsāt pārvietot punktu uz jauno adresi. Ja šādi atstāsiet, tad adrešu bots nomainīs atpakaļ uz veco adresi.
FMC-Henri (2025-07-23 06:56:24+00:00): Auf dem Radweg, was wieso hast du das traffic_sign=DE:240_end gesetzt?
FMC-Henri (2025-07-23 07:00:55+00:00): Ich bezweifel außerdem das oneway von https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908650926 .
Da von der südlichen Seite keine Beschilderung vorhanden ist, müsste hier traffic_sign:forward  und traffic_sign:backward aufgeteilt werden IMHO.
fmc_7 (2025-07-23 09:02:10+00:00): zum traffic_sign=DE:240_end, so ist auf dem mapillary Bild ersichtlich, dass das 240er Schild gestrichen ist und ich das als ordentlich durchstrichen annehme.
fmc_7 (2025-07-23 09:14:16+00:00): Wennn du am oneway=no dieses Weges zweifelst, dann schau dir bitte das folgende mapillary an:658927100504624
FMC-Henri (2025-07-23 09:22:46+00:00): Was bedeutet für dich DE:240_end ? Die Bedeutung kenne ich so nicht. Von der anderen Seite müsste dann aber ein traffic_sign=none festgelegt werden, oder irre ich mich?

Bzgl. oneway=no da gebe ich dir recht - gut gesehen!
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-12 00:22:10+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1414081220

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Omikorin (2025-07-11 19:05:46+00:00): Hej, to jest duplikat już istniejących parkingów - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167751763
Jakub_Gorski (2025-07-22 15:26:16+00:00): Racja, nie odświeżyły się mi wtedy mapy w OsmAnd.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-12 00:22:07+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12994279139

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
josmougn (2026-02-17 01:18:44+00:00): Bonjour geovelo,
Je ne vois pas pourquoi vous avez passé ce chemin de highway=track à highway=path, simplement parce qu'un C115 a été ajouté.
Cette voie n'a pas changé de nature, de caractéristiques physiques, ça reste un track.
D'autant plus que les engins agricoles sont autorisés.
Par contre, motor_vehicle=yes c'est faux.
Et smoothness=intermediate c'est douteux avec tracktype=1 et surface=asphalt.
Pour pinailler encore un peu, j'imagine que source=BDOrtho IGN n'est plus d'actualité.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/284278350
Vétérini (2025-07-20 21:50:58+00:00): Le projet #CartoVeloIDF est toujours en cours ? Si j'avais su, je vous aurais aussi monté les stats en Essonne :d
simon_geovelo (2025-07-30 08:48:55+00:00): oui, il est toujours en cours :-D
NeisBot (2025-07-11 14:04:17+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 05:37:47+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/168798797
danieldegroot2 (2025-08-03 16:46:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1414084463
This seems to be path. Where they are changes from time to time.
(Compare with Esri Clarity)
There is no archaeological site indicated on historic maps/viewer.
b-jazz (2025-07-12 03:50:42+00:00): There's a few problems with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/638818957.

* You moved the fairway and green to an entirely different spot on the map
* The fairway and green are still intersecting each other since they aren't sharing all nodes on the boundary. Looks trivial, but this still sets of the automated Q/A checks that look for this error.
* The golf=hole is now all out of whack
* The golf=hole shares a node with the green. It shouldn't.
2019XCR (2025-07-14 15:47:01+00:00): I'm not sure how I moved the fairway and green as I had no idea I could do that until you mentioned it. I moved it back to where it should be.  Thanks for letting me know.
simer_lkpg (2025-07-11 17:18:18+00:00): Vad exakt är "ditt uppdrag"?
BCNorwich (2025-07-12 05:30:46+00:00): Reverted to remove duplicated highway.
user_5359 (2025-07-12 09:36:27+00:00): Hello! Please have look on https://www.osm.org/way/359173825. Shouldn't the tag belong to one of the relations? whereby the one object relation would not be necessary anyway.
Frans S (2025-07-15 10:09:46+00:00): Hi. I just added the tag estuary to it because it is part of a bigger area.
Should be adjusted to cover the whole estuary, but that is not within the scope of this project. So I leave it as it is.
Thanks for commenting on this.
Best regards
asatoku (2025-07-12 09:16:37+00:00): Redraw the ward/commune-level administrative units for this area instead of deleting them. Please act like a responsible map editor.
IreuN (2025-07-11 22:51:52+00:00): Hej, mam prośbę - nazywaj swoje zestawy zmian tak, żeby opisywało to co zostało zmienione.
Chacalaca (2025-07-11 14:43:54+00:00): This is a follow up to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168800376#map=19/45.554602/-73.554580
mcliquid (2025-07-12 11:05:08+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
flohoff (2025-07-11 15:11:12+00:00): Moin,
ich hab hier nur den changeset gesehen und da hast du das highway crossing komplett gelöscht. 

Das wundert mich so ein bisschen. Da ist keine Querungshilfe?

Und was hat das mit dem OSMI Routing View zu tun?

Flo
flohoff (2025-07-11 15:12:22+00:00): Hier gibts sogar ein Foto von der Querungshilfe auf Mapillary:

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1876180046501127&focus=photo
flohoff (2025-07-11 15:13:48+00:00): Hmmm - oder ich verstehe den changeset nicht.
ratrun (2025-07-11 15:47:47+00:00): Hallo!

Vor meiner Änderung gab es den Knoten doppelt an der selben Stelle.

Daher habe ich Knoten 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12989346224 gemerged mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/43641823#map=19/52.025266/8.513235, wodurch einer der Knoten gelöscht wurde.

OSMI Routing View meckert nicht verbundene "ways" an, dadurch bin ich auf den Fehler aufmerksam gemacht worden.

Ein kleiner Trick von einem JOSM Benutzer an einen ander JOSM Nutzer: Um herauszufinden wie der Zustand vor einer Änderung war. kann man im JOSM mittels Reverter Plugin den Changeset revertieren. Das erleichter in solchen Fällen die Analyse was wirklich gemacht wurde.
YuliyaSurta (2025-07-11 14:55:42+00:00): Wrong source was mentioned. Used National Agriculture Imagery Program and USGS 3D Elevation Program as evidence.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-12 00:32:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12994411947

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304678532
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466891878

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Christoffer S (2025-07-17 08:36:13+00:00): Can someone assist me with getting this passed through? 
New to this page, not sure how to go forward...
Gazer75 (2025-07-18 09:03:21+00:00): Owners wishes has nothing to do with OSM. We map what is there and deleting such items can be considered vandalism.
Do not forget the freedom to roam could play a role here.
Christoffer S (2025-07-19 13:20:57+00:00): There is no physical path or trail here... Its a trail only on the map and its crossing private property and a potato field. 
There is freedom to roam in the beach zone in Norway on a general basis.
Gazer75 (2025-07-19 13:28:03+00:00): There seem to be a path down to the beach and the house with the boats between the potato fields. As long as this is walkable and not destroying crops I'd say it is fine. Obviously you don't walk through a potato field.
Christoffer S (2025-07-19 13:36:52+00:00): It is a private field, not a public trail or path. You can walk the beach zone from a public access point. But the start point of this mapped "trail" is outside the beach zone on private property and not going down to the private boat house your are mentioning.
Gazer75 (2025-07-19 13:42:09+00:00): You need to learn the freedom to roam regulations my friend. 
This is not the US where "private property" is completely off limits. Especially in a situation like this.
Christoffer S (2025-07-19 13:48:32+00:00): The fact that its private is one part of the matter, but the main issue here is that there is no trail or path here hence the map data is incorrect. Why is it then an issue to remove it when that is how it is physically?
Christoffer S (2025-07-19 13:49:19+00:00): "We map what is there"
Gazer75 (2025-07-19 13:53:46+00:00): If someone mapped a path there then it is clearly used.

We see this all the time in OSM where land owner try to force delete a path because it is "private property", completely ignoring the freedom to roam.
TrickyFoxy (2025-07-12 00:22:56+00:00): Что такое Полка?
Zrop (2025-07-18 09:18:23+00:00): Hallo Katzenfan,
der Reitweg war hier mit "highway=bridleway" + "traffic_sign=DE:238" bereits korrekt gemappt. Dadurch sind alle anderen Verkehrsteilnehmer (Fußgänger,Radfahrer,Motorfahrzeuge) ausgeschlossen.

Gruß
Zrop
Katzenfan (2025-07-18 13:02:31+00:00): Hallo Zrop,
wie schon vor einem Jahr diskutiert, wird ohne die von mir korrekt gesetzten Tags der Reitweg in Komoot teilweise als Wanderweg vorgeschlagen. Um falsche Rouenvorschläge zu vermeiden mit teilweise gefährlichen Begegnungen sollten die Tags so bleiben. Dafür sind sie ja vorhanden.
Gruß 
Katzenfan
Zrop (2025-07-19 11:16:27+00:00): wenn Komoot über reine Reitwege routet sollte Komoot angepasst werden, nicht OSM.
"highway=bridleway" beschreibt hier eindeutig das es sich um einen reinen Reitweg handelt. Es macht keinen Sinn bei einem Reitweg durch "access=no" erst alles zu verbieten und dann mit "horse=yes" wieder für Reiter freizugeben. Wir mappen in OSM nur die jeweilige Beschilderung vor Ort.
Katzenfan (2025-07-19 11:37:01+00:00): Wenn OSM diese Funktion bietet und dadurch Komoot korrekt routet halte ich diese Eintragung für sinnvoll und nicht schädlich, da die Funktion wie vorgesehen für den Reiter gewährleistet ist. Die Eintragung ist also korrekt und hilft! Die
Zrop (2025-07-19 21:30:18+00:00): nein, die Eintragung ist nicht korrekt! Das ist mappen für den Router. Die Router auf osm.org routen hier korrekt. Wenn Komoot hier falsch routet muss Komoot nachbessern. Wir mappen in OSM die Beschilderung vor Ort, und dort steht ein VZ 238, also "highway=bridleway" + "traffic_sign=DE:238", mehr nicht!

Siehe auch https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/
Katzenfan (2025-07-20 11:48:50+00:00): Wenn durch das Setzen der Tags sowohl OSM als auch Komoot korrekt funktioniert dann ist doch für alle alles gut!
Die Tags haben keinen Nachteil und daher sollten sie bleiben. Diese Diskussion ist hier doch völlig überflüssig.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-07-12 07:42:07+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18440
Fizzie-DWG (2025-07-14 23:33:03+00:00): Block lifted
IrynaStaradub (2025-07-11 15:46:50+00:00): Not added road. Added one way tag of the road.
ToniE (2025-07-11 15:48:15+00:00): soundtrips -> round-trips
Fliedo (2025-07-23 15:44:15+00:00): Hi 42-Marvin,
irgendetwas ist hier schief gegangen, da sämtliche Tags vom Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6297303575 entfernt wurden.

Bei diesem Restaurant handelt es sich um "Mộng Mơ".

Kann es sein, dass du das Restaurant mit dem Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1094877576 verwechselt hast? Das müsste "Giang Nam" heißen.

Kannst du die Änderung bitte reverten?

Schöne Grüße
Fliedo
Fliedo (2025-08-11 20:25:54+00:00): Ich habe den vorherigen Stand wiederhergestellt. Siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170312028
Kris74M (2025-07-30 12:49:17+00:00): Jeżeli już jest na mapie punkt, to nie tworzymy obok niego nowego , tylko edytujemy i poprawiamy błędy na już istniejącym. Proszę to edytować.
aceman444 (2025-09-29 20:44:07+00:00): Zdravim, takze ktokolvek pri tej firme ma ciel/chce tam ist, sa tam dostane? A nepotrebuje povolenie vlastnika, hoci je tam rampa. Aka je tam presne dopravna znacka?

Evidentne s tym "destination" nemam problem len ja, ale odvtedy uz Vam to aj iny pouzivatel zmenil spat na private.
🇨🇿 Roman Horník (2025-09-30 18:13:53+00:00): Používal jsi někdy navigaci?
NeisBot (2025-07-11 16:45:35+00:00): Hi SidiAmer, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 96% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 47 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=168805346
NeisReview (2025-07-12 06:21:03+00:00): 👍 Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional.

#HappyMapping
SidiAmer (2025-07-22 08:02:01+00:00): Sorry, deletion wasn't intentional. Was a mistake. Please undo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168805346
Leo Slager (2025-07-13 10:26:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2025-07-11 17:46:42+00:00): Hi Tim Miller of Finland, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added a new shop with address and opening hours on Liisankatu."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #NoComment #AIgenerated
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-07-23 03:34:16+00:00): Please don't use roads as boundary relation members.
marczoutendijk (2026-01-01 19:40:26+00:00): Hi,
You have amenity=tourism, but that is not considered a valid key.
You probably wanted to have: tourism=yes
Please check this: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity
and this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tourism
Best regards  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
tagishsimon (2026-01-01 22:18:38+00:00): HI marczoutendijk. The amenity=tourism tag wasn't mine, but I agree with your take and have amended it as you suggest.
thanks
simon
marczoutendijk (2026-01-02 10:51:50+00:00): Thanks!
ivanbranco (2025-07-28 12:18:10+00:00): Ciao sduccio,

cos'è "comune curtatone"? Aggiungere nodi col solo tag name non aiuta a capire cosa rappresenti l'elemento.

grazie e buon mapping
JeremiahLee (2025-07-11 17:48:39+00:00): This was a mistake based on bad UI of the app. Should be undone.
user_5359 (2025-07-12 10:04:41+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/4538574204. What is the mean of the tag v6p1 = v6s ?
A67-A67 (2025-07-12 00:41:25+00:00): Teruggedraaid vanwege bron die niet is toegestaan. Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4850452
muralito (2025-07-12 01:40:59+00:00): Hola. Gracias por los aportes. Hago la revision que pediste.

Cuando agreges elementos que se supone que son rectangulos o cuadrados, conviene que tambien quede la forma cuadrada en el mapeo.

Para eso, segun el editor, tiene una funcion "Ortogonalizar" o "make Square" que pone los angulos a 90° de la figura que tengas seleccionada.

Saludos.
M.
NeisBot (2025-07-11 18:17:02+00:00): Hi xyzxyz15, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added a parcel locker amenity with GLS branding."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
silversurfer83 (2025-07-11 19:00:56+00:00): Hi there :)

the name looks rather descriptive. The fact that it is a beach is already in the tags and you can specify public access by adding "access=yes". Maybe drop the names?

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168810493
Donut Master 🍩 (2025-07-12 12:53:54+00:00): Hello!
I thought I couldn't tag that, so I just named it Public beach.
Thanks!
silversurfer83 (2025-07-12 13:16:17+00:00): 😄

I see.

Whenever you get that thought, hit the wiki (wiki.osm.org) and if that doesn't help, check discord, signal or the forum (where you are already active)

Keep it up 👍🏻
Donut Master 🍩 (2025-07-12 18:50:02+00:00): Thanks again!
LudovicG (2025-07-24 05:58:41+00:00): Bonjour,
Je m'intéresse au node 12994927701 (amenity=library_dropoff) que vous avez récemment ajouté.
Je suis surpris car ce node ne semble pas proche d'une bibliothèque.
Savez-vous quel est son usage devant cette gare (ou qui gère ce mobilier urbain) ?