piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
muchichka_s (2023-08-05 06:10:10+00:00): "Хлібна кава" -> "Хлібний кофе"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945068473/
darkonus (2023-08-05 06:38:51+00:00): 🤦‍♂️ Станція метро "Видубичі" -> Станція метро "Відубічі"
muchichka_s (2023-08-05 06:44:10+00:00): "Півціни на все" -> "Півціні на все"
"Іван Святославович Черниш" -> "Іван Святославович Черніш"

Закінчуй з азірівкою!
muchichka_s (2023-08-05 06:48:33+00:00): "провулок Хоменка" -> "провулок Хом'янка"
luisforte (2023-08-05 10:32:23+00:00): Tens que ter atenção ao eliminar indevidamente um nó com uma loja, por ela ter encerrado: 
O nó tem mais etiquetas válidas além do tipo e nome de loja e assim eliminaste informação válida.
Deves eliminar só as etiquetas que estão desactualizadas/incorrectas.
renosmo (2023-08-05 10:40:05+00:00): Por acaso, pensei nisso quando fiz esta eliminação. Pois, o espaço continua lá e pode a loja ser tomada por outra pessoa. Mas, como está encerrada há muito tempo e não há sinais de que irá haver recuperação económica na sociedade... Mas, sim. Tem razão. Irei então passar a fazer como diz.
renosmo (2023-08-05 10:58:14+00:00): Como tinha sido eu a criar o nó em causa, numa das primeiras edições que aqui fiz, também me senti mais à vontade para fazer a eliminação. Mas, restaurei agora o nó, genericamente apenas como loja, para poder ser então possivelmente editado no futuro.
luisforte (2023-08-05 14:49:31+00:00): Ia recuperar o nó antigo, mas assim também fica resolvido👍
renosmo (2023-08-05 18:42:15+00:00): A minha impressão estava errada e parece que, afinal, eu só tinha criado outros nós ao lado (e o nó desta loja tinha sido criado por outra utilizadora). De qualquer modo, o anterior tinha o nome da rua incorrecto e da nova maneira que agora está ficou melhor. (Mas, fico contente por saber que há quem consiga reverter eliminações - pois, tem-me preocupado a ideia de possíveis actos de vandalismo.) Problema resolvido, então.
emersonveenstra (2023-08-14 18:29:55+00:00): Are you sure these roads are not drivable at all? Looks like a lot of residential roads now have no access
Larmax (2023-08-08 13:57:31+00:00): Based on what? It seems to be common practice in Finland at least. The wiki doesn't say anything like that either: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=residential
MxxCon (2023-08-05 04:19:12+00:00): Hello.
For way 1194892701 you tagged it as outdoor_seating. Perhaps https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dbleachers is more appropriate for this feature?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139464084
PatrickStar1 (2023-08-05 04:57:35+00:00): Ahh you're right, I fixed it. 👍
dpolovinkin (2023-10-02 07:10:49+00:00): hi! I suppose you know that you are adding hostel points to a whole OpenStreetMap database, in such a way you created 4 points for the same hostel on the map which everyone can see, its unnecessary. I will leave only one point on the map and remove others.

And also feel free to add new info to a map in general, to make it even better! :)
user_5359 (2023-08-06 06:33:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only name and description, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Supaplex (2024-05-29 05:23:18+00:00): Revert due to it being a fake bus station

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151971162
AgusQui (2023-08-12 00:15:19+00:00): ¿153 desde Floresta? Sale desde Liniers hace años.
Agus K (2023-08-15 22:59:50+00:00): Mea culpa. Cuando agregué el recorrido vi que en Floresta había una nota en una parada diciendo que pasaba el 153 (no era la única, había bastantes a lo largo de Rivadavia) así que lo tomé como que alguien anotó que pasaba por ahí, por eso la agregué pero sin otras paradas en el medio (ya que no conocía ninguna). Ahora que pienso esa nota podría haber sido puesta hace muchos años, lo cual tiene más lógica. Ahí lo revierto y lo pongo desde Liniers! Gracias por la observación
AgusQui (2023-08-15 23:20:25+00:00): Ah sí, las notas probablemente sean mías, pero de hace varios años. Voy agregando notas de los bondis que faltan mapear.
idk_ (2023-08-05 06:05:59+00:00): It looks like ID editor has re-uploaded an earlier version of my changes from changeset #139465048 so I will be reverting it now.
idk_ (2023-08-05 06:13:32+00:00): see #139465969
Diacritic (2024-04-23 01:56:27+00:00): Hi Surveyor.

You have changed the layout of these roads to match old imagery.

The roads have been adjusted. Please review the newest imagery possible before making changes.
Liqid1010 (2023-08-08 14:18:19+00:00): Zaujímalo by ma prečo si odstránil landuse=residential. Je to nejaký nový štandardný postup?
*Martin* (2023-08-08 15:10:10+00:00): Ano, je to štandardné zmazat uplne nepresne veci z OSM. Tie som importoval este ja z Corine Landcover niekedy v praveku, ked nic lepsie nebolo. Teraz ich treba nakreslit podla katastra.
Liqid1010 (2023-08-08 15:13:00+00:00): Takže ešte sa to dokreslí z katastra alebo sa to bude importovať? Ak kreslím niečo ja ručne, kde v katastri nájdem kde presne dať residential?
*Martin* (2023-08-08 21:10:37+00:00): Nejaky nastel som dal na https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/41GH5eSU9ig/m/MDKvqRJfBQAJ

Treba nejako odniekial vybrat vsetky parcely, ktore vieme identifikovat ako parcely zastavanych oblasti, alebo nieco take :-)
rhtb0 (2023-08-06 04:47:15+00:00): 입체교차로가 있는 도로를 격하하시는 이유가 무엇입니까?
user_14366776 (2023-08-09 05:42:42+00:00): 도로 유형을 수정한걸 말씀하시는 거라면 OSM 위키에 "Ko:한국의 도로" 대로 편집하고 있습니다.
user_14366776 (2023-08-09 05:49:44+00:00): 잘못된 부분이 있다면 고치도록 하겠습니다.
kmpoppe_repair (2025-02-22 12:09:20+00:00): BayernAtlas ist keine zulässige Quelle, wie in https://c.osm.org/t/96954 diskutiert. 

Änderungen werden entweder reverted oder manuell zurückgesetzt und redacted. 

DWG Ticket#2023082810000201

Kai
OSMF DataWorkingGroup (DWG)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162813610
mapbear66 (2023-08-05 15:14:43+00:00): Hi. Why have you deleted this service road/driveway?

You realise that won't help you police your property, and  someone, often a local mapper will replace it. The existence of a way on OpenStreetMap does not indicate a right of access - what you can do is to mark it private with an access tag "access=private". What you shouldn't do is to delete valid data.
lilias's garden Rudha Mor (2023-08-05 15:40:02+00:00): it's a driveway and no one else has their driveway on here?  it's not relevant to the mapping I've had motor company promote it as a road. My children almost hit on my driveway. OS has removed it dew to safety so un less every driveway in the village is mapped respectfully people will not put it back on.
mapbear66 (2023-08-05 16:09:02+00:00): There are lots of service roads to properties marked on OSM, but that's beside the point. 

OS hasn't removed your driveway from their mapping, I can still see it. And I doubt they would anyway. It's a valid thing to map. Anyway, this is about OpenStreetMap. 

Changing things on OSM or OS is not going to stop people acting stupidly on your driveway. You need to stop them having access to it with gates or a chain.

I see your gardens are listed on VisitScotland and discoverscottishgardens.org. Have you discussed the problems you are having with them. Or contacted the local police for more practical  advice.
lilias's garden Rudha Mor (2023-08-05 16:17:56+00:00): yes the police are very aware, and we having to list the property to try and stop companies promoting the property as a free for all
mapbear66 (2023-08-05 16:27:00+00:00): Okay. So to make sure I have the picture correctly. Is your property a  'garden' which people have some access to at certain times? Or are you a purely private property like anyone else's garden?
greenbudgie (2023-08-05 07:03:24+00:00): osmand'ın karnı acıkmış her şeyi barbekü olarak görüyor :D
sis651 (2023-08-06 07:44:38+00:00): @greenbudgie Osmand'da menhol etiketi yok hocam. En yakın mangal var. Ben de mangal olarak işaretleyip, en son JOSM'dan menhole çeviriyorum. :)
Frans S (2023-08-05 12:16:36+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please focus on through going highways, which serve as connection roads between houses / settlements/ villages and so on. 
Mapping just tracks in farmland is waste of time.
Also use the correct taggings.  
See this wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India/Tags/Highway
BollWeevil (2023-09-18 21:00:11+00:00): Здравей, базирано на какви данни е добавен полигона за ФЕЦ Априлци? Доста от площта не са панели на актуалните сателитни снимки, а и според кадастъра доста от площите са все още земеделска земя. Благодаря!
REAKTOR (2023-09-25 10:14:34+00:00): Здравей, Използвал съм сателитни снимки от Sentinel, на които се вижда положението, което съм начертал. Обектът още е в строеж и спрямо последните месеци има още площ за добавяне откъм пътя за Панагюрище.
Aidas Kasparas (2025-09-15 14:43:24+00:00): Sveikas, Vaidotai,
Aš šiandien buvau pastate, kuriam tu uždėjai pavadinimą Experimentica. Nemačiau tokio pavadinimo. Prie įėjimo tik UAB Pentasweet ir UAB Gensinta logotipai. O Experimenticą gmaps rodo gretimą namą -- 32 254.
Vaidotas (2025-09-15 15:10:39+00:00): Dėkoju už pastabą, tikrai kažką prižioplinau - pagal mapillary matyti, kad pavadinimą uždėjau ne ant to pastato: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.753455599999995&lng=25.41243689999999&z=17&pKey=1084321183030590&focus=photo&x=0.26927601367586024&y=0.48094612145049687&zoom=0

Pataisiau.
laurent-38 (2023-08-06 08:51:59+00:00): Bonjour Olivier,
Avant cette modification, la _piste d'athlétisme_ me paraissait correctement modélisée par un multipolygone, avec son contour intérieur et son contour extérieur.

Qu'est-ce qui a motivé ce changement ?

Pour l'instant, je suis tenté de l'annuler pour revenir à la situation antérieure.

Cordialement
~~
Laurent
Olivier DUC (2023-08-07 12:28:11+00:00): Bonjour, il me semble que l'extrémité sud de la ligne droite de la piste n'est plus utilisée (stockage de matériel divers), et la représentation en 2 contours ne me paraissait pas indispensable. Mais vous pouvez revenir en arrière si ça vous semble plus pertinent.
Bonne journée,
Olivier.
laurent-38 (2023-08-06 20:15:40+00:00): Bonjour, 

Il ne s'agissait pas d'un arrêt de bus redondant. En effet, on cartographie séparément les positions où les passager attendent (public_transport=platform) et les position où le bus s’arrête (public_transport=stop_position).

J'ai donc restauré ce point (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139531222)

Cordialement
~~
laurent
Damian05 (2023-08-05 07:22:21+00:00): Dodano nowe budynki i proszę aby sprawdzić czy zostały dobrze umieszczone
Dimacn (2023-08-05 20:04:29+00:00): Пожалуйста, не добавляйте объекты на карту не существующие в реальности. Если это личные отметки, то храните их у себя в навигаторе локально.
JeroenHoek (2025-09-16 15:15:24+00:00): playground=bridge?
tubajoe (2025-09-16 16:29:59+00:00): Oeps? Wat is er gebuurd? Dat kan niet kloppen. Ik heb de playground gewist.
Nithinat S (2023-08-05 16:32:48+00:00): Footway with area=yes should not be used for linear footway. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway#Areas for more details.
Kri_ttt (2023-08-06 07:03:09+00:00): I mapped these area as to describe the area it covers, but anyway Tag:area=yes still needs to be tag, in order for the areas to be rendered and to comply with what was said in the wiki page.
Nithinat S (2023-08-06 14:18:24+00:00): If I understand correctly, first, it should be highway=pedestrian rather than highway=footway because it is wide enough for motor cars, as stated in Thailand Wiki. ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Rough_guidelines_for_minor_highway_tag_decision-making_(useful_in_most_cases) )
Second, highway=footway + area=yes is for non-linear footway, according to the wiki. The area that you have tagged is a linear one, so it should be area:highway=*.
Furthermore, I think tagging it to be rendered violates the "Don't map for the renderer" principle of OSM.
Regards
SomeoneElse (2024-02-07 20:21:43+00:00): I'm not sure how it happened, but quite a few of the ones added for York here were wrong.  An example was https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2466092653/history , where that naptan code is actually for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2527494752 , which you can verify via http://deps.at/?32900260 .
CjMalone (2024-02-07 21:44:03+00:00): I've repressed my Naptan memories! :P

If the errors are specific for York, I suspect their data in Naptan has/had issues. It's each local authorities responsibility to update Naptan, and I'm sure some are worse than others.

Taking a look at another website that shows Naptan data:
https://www.geopunk.co.uk/bus-stop/3290YYA00260
https://www.geopunk.co.uk/bus-stop/3290YYA00261
We can see that both of these have the same NaptanCode (3290026), I suspect the first should 32900260 and the latter 32900261.

I can't find any details about deps.at, but Naptan doesn't include timetable information. It may be getting it's data via Traveline or the new(ish) BODS. It seems likely that there is an issue in Naptan, but not the other dataset.
CjMalone (2024-02-07 21:45:24+00:00): Every case with more than 1 naptan:NaptanCode or naptan:AtcoCode is suspect. It was on my TODO list to check them, but I never got far.

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/naptan%3ANaptanCode#values
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/naptan%3AAtcoCode#values
SomeoneElse (2024-02-07 22:24:34+00:00): Thanks - I've found a dozen or so so far (most of https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1H3d ).  I'll try and scan the QR codes on the bus stops to see if I can find any way to "translate" the incorrect ones.  Some are, I'm sure, just old data.
olo81 (2023-09-03 01:23:14+00:00): Jeśli staw ma nazwę, to nazywamy staw, a nie dodajemy dodatkowo punkt place=locality
Jest to dokładnie wyjaśnione na wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:place=locality?uselang=pl
Kolejna spraw skąd ta nazwa?
Frans S (2023-08-05 11:37:42+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139468736
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-05 08:20:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091845557

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
michel60 (2024-02-14 22:14:27+00:00): Bonjour,
j'essaie de regrouper ou de trouver ce bus, mais je ne trouve aucune page sur le wiki qui recence ces lignes de bus. Auriez vous une idée? Cordialement Michel
nlehuby (2024-02-15 11:28:34+00:00): Bonjour,

Pendant un temps, on faisait effectivement des pages de ce type sur le wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/France/Bus_Marne-la-Vall%C3%A9e pour lister les lignes de bus par réseau ou par opérateur.

Mais en Île-de-France aujourd'hui, ces pages ne sont plus vraiment maintenues : c'est beaucoup de travail pour tenir ça à jour, d'autant qu'avec l'ouverture à la concurrence, ça change souvent et on a déjà dû mal à suivre dans OSM...

En remplacement, pour avoir une liste de référence, on peut utiliser les données d'IDFM : https://data.iledefrance-mobilites.fr/explore/dataset/referentiel-des-lignes/information/

Pour voir les lignes côté OSM, on peut utiliser les sites suivants 
- https://ref-lignes-stif.5apps.com/ 
- https://jungle-bus.github.io/unroll/?project=IDF

Les deux permettent de rechercher ou de filtrer sur un opérateur ou un réseau.

J'espère que ça répond à vos questions.

nlehuby
michel60 (2024-02-15 14:03:44+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour ces précieux renseignements, mais l'important ce n'est pas l'opérateur (ça n'a pas d'intérêt) mais c'est la ligne de bus et sa localisation. Je travaille principalement dans l'Oise alors ce qui m'intéresse ce sont les BUS de l'oise :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/France/Bus_Busval_d%27Oise 
et enfin GEOFABRIK OSM Inspector qui permet de voir les routes invalides (certe maj toutes les 12heures)
Car bien souvent il y a des gaps et des stop mal placés ou mal ordonnés ...
Cordialement Michel
eggie (2023-08-05 11:57:04+00:00): Dag Juefried. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. Probeer in het vervolg daar op bij te taggen.
Voor adressen is een afgesproken format.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=139469253

MVG
eggie
blacx (2023-10-01 10:48:35+00:00): no esborris un tros de cami, si hi ha una porta es posa una porta, selecciones un node del cami on hi vulguis posar la porta i a l'esquerra et sortira per etiquetar aquell node amb lo que vulguis, en aquest cas busques porta i ja esta, tens etiquetes per a tot, blocs de ciment, pals, lo que vulguis
Awizonosz (2023-08-19 08:05:58+00:00): Czemu zrobiłeś tor zmiany kierunków dla tramwajów na Wolskiej na torze Południowym? Przecież tramwaje tam jadą dalej po torze Północnym
silversurfer83 (2023-08-06 14:09:37+00:00): Moin :)

warum hast du die Gebäude denn erst gelöscht und dann neu gezeichnet?

grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139471282
palimpadum (2023-08-29 16:23:55+00:00): Viele Gebäude waren nach Luftbild gezeichnet und für Hessen gibt es mittlerweile ALKIS. Normalerweise behalte ich die Historie von Objekten bei. Wenn die Korrektur aber deutlich aufwändiger ist als das Neuzeichnen, lasse ich das. Bei alten Gebäudeumrissen sehe ich darin keinen großen Sinn.
vasony (2023-08-06 07:42:51+00:00): légy szíves pótold az utcaneveket.
josm nem szól hogy hiányos?
utvonalfelmeresek (2023-08-06 17:29:49+00:00): De szól, de attól még nem tudom az utcaneveket!
Ezeket a házszámokat jellemzően autóból fotóztam!
vasony (2023-08-07 15:16:25+00:00): Nem kell tudnod a felmérésnél, amikor beírod a házszámot, beírod az utcanevet ami a ház előtt lévő úton fut, ennyi nem nagy tudomány és nekem órákat spórolsz, hogy az összes általad felvitt házszámot kiegészítsem. Ha már csak a sarok épületeket hagyod üresen az is nagyságrendekkel kevesebb utólagos munka.
Frans S (2023-08-05 10:00:02+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please tag these traces as track, or don't map them at all, since these are just of local interest.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
Best regards
mueschel (2023-08-12 11:37:28+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node, it got a strange 'stronie' tag: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11091146659
zVID (2023-08-14 16:18:33+00:00): Hi,
Copy/paste problem ;)
Corrected.
Thanks for paying attention.
Regards.
Tomas_J (2024-03-20 14:21:47+00:00): Ahoj, co znamena ta surface=unpaved, ktoru si pridal u budovy? Nedava sa to iba na chodniky a cesty?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139473083
Patr1k_P (2024-03-20 16:12:37+00:00): ahoj, uz som to zmazal, to bol omyl
Tomas_J (2024-03-20 16:17:29+00:00): Je to asi aj na viacerých domoch v okolí.
Patr1k_P (2024-03-20 17:50:27+00:00): nenasiel som inde, len v tej obci
Tomas_J (2024-03-20 19:11:39+00:00): ok, vymazal som v hornych zelenciach z objektov,ktore vyhovovali type:way building surface:unpaved - viz. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148930107
Patr1k_P (2024-03-20 21:47:54+00:00): jaj, už viem prečo som tieto prehliadol, ok dik za upozornenie
Tomas_J (2024-03-20 22:33:00+00:00): Building=detached, že? :)
Patr1k_P (2024-03-21 13:40:58+00:00): mal som navolene len building=yes :)
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-13 03:19:32+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141187289
eggie (2023-08-05 11:51:59+00:00): Welkom bij OSM...

Graag het adres intact laten als een bedrijf gaat verhuizen. 
De adresnode heb ik hersteld.
MVG
eggie
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-13 03:19:33+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141187289
gscscnd (2023-08-05 19:34:46+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-05 12:00:30+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3654929532
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11091283935
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2604098981
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223750676
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223750615
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223750612

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Nicrame (2023-08-05 12:28:30+00:00): Drogi bocie, zmiany na pewno są poprawne, zamieszkuję tamten teren i jedynie wprowadziłem poprawki, które wcześniej były błędnie wprowadzone. Z wyrazami szacunku.
NorthCrab (2023-08-12 13:08:36+00:00): Okej!
osmviborg (2023-08-05 12:41:48+00:00): Mener du helt alvorligt at dette er et billede af Tuse Å? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16162292
osmviborg (2023-08-05 12:43:31+00:00): Tuse Å: https://vis.dataforsyningen.dk/stednavne2/1233766a-24f5-6b98-e053-d480220a5a3f/Tuse%20%C3%85
silversurfer83 (2023-08-06 14:11:27+00:00): Hi :)

warum hast du https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/923891644 denn gelöscht? Kollege Silberner See hat dran geschrieben, dass er sie noch benötigt.
Hast du ihn gefragt, ob sie weg kann? Er reagiert eigentlich immer flott auf Nachrichten

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139476626
mp747474 (2023-08-05 12:21:46+00:00): sicher, dass die Aufteilung zwischen Baseler Platz 7 und Esslinger Straße 1 so korrekt ist? Der Friseur gibt jedenfalls seine eigene Adresse als Baseler Straße 7 an, nicht Esslinger Straße 1. 

Darüber hinaus halte ich es für sehr unglücklich den bestehenden Gebäudeumriss zu löschen und einfach einen neuen Gebäudeumriss drüber zu zeichnen. Die Gebäudeumrisse haben wir aus den amtlichen Daten und sind sehr genau, das nochmal grob drüberzuzeichnen ist eigentlich eine Verschlechterung.
MapOtterz (2023-08-05 12:26:57+00:00): Ziemlich sicher. Sind auf jeden Fall zwei unterschiedliche Gebäude. Kannst dich gerne auf dem Geoportal Frankfurt vergewissern.
Können auch die alten Umrisse nutzen. Baseler Platz 7 und Esslinger Straße 1 sind aber auf alle Fälle getrennt.
Was den Friseur anbelangt, der Eingang befindet sich in der Esslinger Straße, weshalb ich ihn auch bevorzugt dort hin setzen würde.
MapOtterz (2023-08-05 12:36:25+00:00): Ich denke das Problem ist folgendes:
Der Eingang zum Baseler Eck (Baseler Platz 7) befindet sich auf der Baseler Platz Seite. Der Eingang für die Wohnung auf Seite der Esslinger Straße 1. Diese Teilen sich den Eingang mit der Esslinger Straße 1. Da der Friseur noch einmal rechts davon in der Esslinger Straße liegt, würde ich ihn auf Esslinger Straße 1 setzten. Ich denke das ist auch korrekt. (vgl. google street view Esslinger Straße 1)