piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Fizzie-DWG (2026-04-16 23:05:36+00:00): & you've then "updated" your edits but haven't actually changed anything?
Fizzie-DWG (2026-04-25 05:43:23+00:00): DWG reference: Ticket#2026042510000111 — user / JeAlexY
Tomasz Herud (2026-05-22 13:00:34+00:00): Dlaczego zamieniłeś bicycle:designated na yes? Teraz źle się renderuje na mapach.
dzamper (2026-05-27 21:47:39+00:00): Renderowanie jest rzeczą wtórną, natomiast mam przekonanie graniczące z pewnością że te zmiany zostały wykonane z niewiedzy :(

Większość już została wycofana przez innych, to co się ostało wycofałem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183276780
Tomasz Herud (2026-05-28 09:53:42+00:00): Jest już ok. Dzięki.
YduH (2026-05-28 10:00:32+00:00): wybaczcie, tak z niewiedzy, źle mi sie tworzyły trasy w mapy.cz pokazywało że tam rower nie może jeżdzić, przepraszam
dzamper (2026-05-28 10:53:04+00:00): To trochę dziwne ze strony mapy.cz, bo przynajmniej w wersji przeglądarkowej wyznaczanie trasy wygląda normalnie:

https://mapy.com/pl/turisticka?planovani-trasy&rc=9r0KAxZCWUf8jWN&rs=coor&rs=coor&ri=&ri=&mrp=%7B%22c%22%3A121%2C%22dt%22%3A%22%22%2C%22d%22%3Atrue%7D&xc=%5B%5D&rwp=1%3B9q.yQxZCahELNbKbNe&x=18.6320575&y=50.2832366&z=18
YduH (2026-05-28 10:56:02+00:00): z Knurowa kierowało mnie przez centrum Gliwic bo nie umiało przejechać tutaj rowerem, albo się nie znam pewnie to 2.
Famlam (2026-04-19 17:51:08+00:00): De tag placment is waarschijnlijk een typo op way 1499624158 ;)
Ernie C (2026-04-19 17:59:00+00:00): Oh oeps, gefixt
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-16 11:05:12+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, likely sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184176144

https://osm.org/changeset/184176144
NeisBot (2026-04-15 14:48:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13730494182 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Beauty school"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisBot (2026-04-15 14:54:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13732352848 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tacos and Tequila Bar"

#MapWithoutSpam
eggie (2026-04-15 17:10:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-04-15 15:15:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1499631934 v1 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5823511516 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181372351
ivanbranco (2026-05-12 17:27:25+00:00): Ciao demon_box,

vedo che hai revertato delle mie modifiche, ad esempio:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/622143827/history

qua hai cancellato il tag dalla way, e trasformato la way nel solo outer di una relazione con un solo membro. Come mai?

Avevo già notato la stessa cosa due anni fa ma senza risposta: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149979060
demon_box (2026-05-12 17:42:46+00:00): Ciao ivanbranco, tecnicamente non ho revertato nessun tuo changeset (non ho infatti utilizzato la funzione di Josm "Ripristina gruppo di modifiche") semplicemente ho effettuato delle modifiche ad alcuni landuse in base a come li ho visti ora. Tutto qua.
ivanbranco (2026-05-12 17:51:54+00:00): Ma perché trasformare semplici poligoni in multipoligoni con un solo outer? Mi sfugge il beneficio della modifica

Questi elementi sono tra l'altro segnalati da Osmose: https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/it/issue/1fd9696c-0ae3-12c3-56e4-4eced274e954
demon_box (2026-05-12 17:56:14+00:00): ...faccio parecci edit, ti assicuro tutt'altro che a caso
ora sinceramente xò nn ti so rispondere alla tua domanda...
se ho fatto qualcosa di sbagliato dimmelo pure, ciao
demon_box (2026-05-12 17:56:46+00:00): *parecchi
demon_box (2026-05-12 18:53:16+00:00): ..anzi ripensandoci ora mi viene la risposta...
tu dici che senso ha creare un multipoligono con 1 solo outer
capisco detto così hai ragione al momento nn ha senso ma nn è neppure sbagliato diciamo che nn aggiunge e nn toglie
di solito (in linea generale)  lo faccio x futuri sviluppi legati ai cambiamenti con i landuse attigui, ecco questo è il motivo...
demon_box (2026-05-12 19:04:29+00:00): certo questi elementi mi fai notare che Osmose li evidenzia con "problemi" ma la mia personalissima opinione è che in realtà sono dei "falsi" problemi intendo, nn si può sostenere che sono dei reali errori che vanno assolutamente corretti altrimenti possono dar luogo a conseguenze negative x l'intera piattaforma OSM
questo è il mio pensiero
cmq grazie x lo scambio di opinioni, nn fa mai male ;-)
demon_box (2026-04-16 08:24:27+00:00): Ciao LuSirto, è errato taggare landuse=farm come nodo

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13732569901/

deve essere per forza un'area, probabilmente volevi taggare place=farm ed è la correzione che ho fatto.
Grazie e BuonMapping!
yelisey90 (2026-04-16 06:36:38+00:00): reverted with respect to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1361613020 - the road is definitely there, it can be seen from the aerial imagery. Please do not delete roads even if they are with private access, but rather add barriers and/or access tags
BCNorwich (2026-04-16 06:35:28+00:00): Hi, Almost all of your tracks are actually boundary edges of small fields. There is one track from east to west.

Regards Bernard.
MATT Gorr (2026-04-15 15:30:33+00:00): To był chyba ciek i się pomyliłem uczę się tego dopiero i nie umiem cofnąc
stasiu512 (2026-04-15 18:23:10+00:00): Cześć, ciek przywróciłem w tej edycji - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181381643
Yunan973 (2026-04-16 12:14:38+00:00): Bonjour,

ce n'est pas la première fois que tu confonds outer et inner, peux tu corriger tes erreurs visibles ici
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-0.91398&lat=45.89360&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
flex16 (2026-04-15 16:37:02+00:00): What's the problem with this tag??
whitepanda (2026-04-22 06:29:34+00:00): Hi flex16,

Thank you for your valuable feedback. I removed the covered tag as it was not generally used along with man_made=bridge, and thought it was redundant. Upon further inspection I realized that the use of this tag is adopted by some users and there has been discussions around it: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:covered#Discourage_%22covered%22_for_linear_roads_under_bridges

I’ve restored the tag since the removal was not exactly an improvement and I’ll be more aware with such tagging discussions. Thank you for reaching out.
keyyushi (2026-04-15 21:11:03+00:00): Merhaba, öncelikle düzenlemeleriniz için teşekkür ederim.

Otobüs hatlarının isim değişikliği ile ilgili yazıyorum. 

Şahsen otobüs kodlarının isim kısmında olması gerektiğini düşünüyorum. İstanbul'da da burada olduğu gibi isimlerde otobüs kodu ile beraber bir kullanım mevcut. 

Sizin düşünceleriniz neler? Değişikliği geri almalı mıyız?
emrebdeniz (2026-06-07 12:05:29+00:00): merhaba, geç cevap için özür dilerim farketmemişim gelen bildirimi. hat numaraları ile ilgili toplulukta da tartışmalar mevcut o yüzden emin değilim malesef. genel olarak bir düzende mutabık kalınırsa tüm değişiklikleri yine eskisi gibi yapabiliriz, çok fazla hat eklenmemiş neyse ki şimdilik.
Wildsharky (2026-04-16 09:32:24+00:00): Revert of 181339291
NeisBot (2026-04-15 15:57:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13527380091 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "plumbing company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-15 22:33:20+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 11:07:12+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset 184907875

https://osm.org/changeset/184907875
NeisBot (2026-04-15 16:09:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13732679619 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Arztpraxis"

#MapWithoutSpam
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-15 16:12:19+00:00): wycofuje https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/16513992
Hypsometric (2026-04-15 18:00:45+00:00): This was not a bot edit. What was "badly done" about this edit?
DFW-Backyard7 (2026-04-15 20:28:40+00:00): I'm confused too. Editing across the entire world at once (and having a world-spanning bbox) is not ideal but it doesn't look automated to me and only affects 24 items
aighes (2026-04-15 22:22:23+00:00): If it wasn't a bot edit, how did you made sure that each object you changed is actually a leisure=resort? E.g. node 6782247328 doesn't look like one.
Hypsometric (2026-04-16 00:32:35+00:00): I viewed everything from satellite imagery and searched the internet for ones that were not obvious.

For node/6782247328, satellite imagery supports it. The info online that was not automatically aggregated also supported it.
aighes (2026-04-16 00:44:45+00:00): leisure=resort requires an accommodation provision. I can't find any source supporting that. Please share your source.
Hypsometric (2026-04-16 03:50:51+00:00): To avoid creating a mess of this discussion, I suggest you do a simple web search and look for the Facebook and Weebly.

Most features in this small changeset are well over 10 years old and started with tourism=resort. This was a simple change. Anyone in iD editor is prompted to make this change.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-16 07:45:45+00:00): > This was not a bot edit. What was "badly done" about this edit?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181370435 was

- worldwide edit
- mentioning deprecation as sole reason for edit
- overwriting existing data without explanation
- not stating any source whatsoever (despite JOSM begging you to state one) - if you at least looked at aerial then source=aerial on changeset (or more specific like source=Bing) would clarify that you actually looked at something

if that was not a bot edit and you actually looked at these objects feel free to revert this edit as it was based on wrong assumptions

if you actually used some sources (aerial, survey) then it is highly useful to add them to changeset info
Hypsometric (2026-04-17 13:00:48+00:00): Mateusz, thanks for giving some useful feedback. I wonder if you use JOSM in a different language. Your comment about "JOSM begging you to state one" made me laugh a little. In English it is a light suggestion that is optional.

I will possibly revisit this later. Have a good day.
eggie (2026-04-15 17:11:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Probeer als het kan de adresnode te selecteren en dan de info bij te taggen.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
iandees (2026-04-15 16:31:10+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11848285366 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181376127, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
ceirios (2026-04-15 17:00:07+00:00): Hi there,

This name was added as part of an import - why did you remove this?

Diolch
Ceirios
iandees (2026-04-15 16:42:30+00:00): Hi! It looks like the website URL on way/493164965 may have been copied from Google Maps (it contained Google tracking parameters). Please be careful not to copy information from Google into OpenStreetMap, as Google's data is copyrighted.
stasiu512 (2026-04-15 18:28:24+00:00): Hi, why did you remove this McDonald's? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6206261506/history/3 It's visible at https://mcdonalds.pl/restauracje/pomorskie/gdansk/gdansk-ul-slowackiego-210/
yourealwaysbe (2026-04-15 19:01:48+00:00): It looks like a duplicate of this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5715746847

I left the one which is where the main unit is. The one i deleted was where the external seating is. Unless i've misunderstood something.
stasiu512 (2026-04-15 20:28:28+00:00): okay, it was actually a duplicate
NeisBot (2026-04-15 16:48:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13732476910 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Metaphysical supply store"

#MapWithoutSpam
Syl (2026-04-16 16:20:20+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai modifié les bornes que vous avez créé place Jean Jaurès et place de l'Hôtel de Ville. Les bornes vertes servent pour des évènements et ne sont pas utiles pour les incendies. Je ne crois pas que StreetComplete prenne en charge ce type d'objet.
Merci pour vos ajouts.
Dedeil59 (2026-04-20 10:12:58+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour les corrections et l'information. Ce type de borne n'est pas pris en charge par StreetComplete mais je viens de voir qu'il existe une façon de les cartographier sur OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dhydrant
Syl (2026-04-20 11:52:18+00:00): Merci pour le lien vers le wiki, j'étais passé à côté. J'ai modifié celles de Saint-Étienne en utilisant ce nouvel attribut.
Ltrlg (2026-04-19 06:47:29+00:00): Quelle est la source ?
mw014 (2026-04-20 12:19:12+00:00): source terrain (le panneau), je penserai à préciser pour mes prochains ajouts
Ltrlg (2026-04-20 16:07:55+00:00): C’est une bonne habitude à prendre. OSM a la culture de toujours renseigner les sources. Ça apporte deux choses :

1. la vérifiabilité : un autre contributeur peut utiliser la même source (dans la mesure du possible) pour juger de la pertinence de l’interprétation de celle-ci, évaluer la fraîcheur des données, etc.
2.  ça donne aux réutilisateurs la transparence nécessaire pour vérifier l’absence de risque juridique. Les contributeurs qui ne le font pas sont toujours un peu suspects.

Bref, il peut y avoir des modifications sans sources (par exemple un changement purement technique comme changeset/181524062, même si on pourrait arguer que j’utilise ma connaissance des institutions françaises pour dire que ce n’est pas le nom du bâtiment), mais c’est plus l’exception que la règle normalement.
StC (2026-04-15 17:51:58+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a introduit une discontinuité dans un itinéraire pédestre, en mélangeant des chemins avec les sous-relations membres de la relation parente. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
Ltrlg (2026-04-19 06:49:48+00:00): Dans le cas présent, ce sont les deux écoles à l’intérieur de la zone qui sont valides (cf. ref:UAI=*), la bonne modification est de passer le groupe en landuse=education (il ne doit pas y avoir une école dans une école).
iandees (2026-04-15 17:35:14+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9562180526 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181379499, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
sanchi (2026-04-16 11:22:00+00:00): Hola. Los edificios y las cosas no se dibujan de cualquier manera. Pisandose los nodos de los edificios y las vías, dibujándolo de cualquier manera que no representa la realidad...
Borrados todos los edificios mal editados
Dawid2849 (2026-04-15 17:32:03+00:00): Cześć,
area:highway=traffic_island służy do oznaczenia wysepek, które się omija, te natomaist są przejezdne, więc service było jednak lepsze moim zdaniem. Warto też nie kasować obiektów tylko po to, aby zmieniać ich geometrię (w odniesieniu do ronda z ulicami Reja i Ogrodową): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki#Zachowaj_histori%C4%99
Wally_PL (2026-04-15 17:38:08+00:00): Dzięki, dostosuję się na przyszłość.
Wally_PL (2026-04-16 17:19:13+00:00): Przywróciłem stare tagi na obu rondach.
whb (2026-07-23 21:35:57+00:00): Guten Tag,

eine Frage zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13732943145
Ist in der Nähe der Sitzbank ein Wasserhahn oder was soll das bedeuten?
Siehe auch:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5407487

Viele Grüße
whb
theophrastos (2026-07-24 04:45:20+00:00): Hallo,
nein, da hat die Vervollständigungsfunktion von JOSM zugeschlagen und ich habe nicht aufgepasst. Wollte eigentlich das Material eingeben. Da ich leider nicht mehr weiß, welches Material die Bank, löscht man das besser.

MfG
Klaus
Wildsharky (2026-04-17 12:03:55+00:00): Revert of 181367165
werbuli (2026-04-21 08:49:13+00:00): Hallo TornadoFang,
gerade gesehen das du innerörtlich straßenbegleitende Fuß-/Radwege als eigenständige Linie einzeichnest. Die sind jedoch häufig bereits an der jeweiligen Straße als solche erfasst - z.B mit sidewalk=both.
Wenn du jetzt Fuß-/Radwege gesondert erfasst, müssen auch die Tags an der jeweiligen Straße (Hauptlinie) angepasst werden (sind sonst redundand).
Sie hierzu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren
Zum Thema "Einzeichnen eines lediglich durch einen Bordstein von der Straße getrennten Gehsteigs" gibt es im Forum auch div. Diskussionen, z.B. hier
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/footway-loschen-weil-separat-gemappt/90767/10
TornadoFang (2026-04-21 09:53:17+00:00): Ich habe es aus dem Grund gemacht, da ich so auch aus meiner Logik heraus auch Einrichtungen für Menschen mit Behinderung einpflegen kann. Ich habe mich selbstständig da rein gearbeitet und besten gewissen gearbeitet.
werbuli (2026-04-21 13:22:19+00:00): Ich wollte dir keine Absicht unterstellen! Viele Mapper, auch ich, haben sich durch Lesen von wiki und Forum das mappen selbst angeeignet - und auch Fehler gemacht. Ich finde es nicht gut, dass andere Mapper hinter mir "aufräumen" (Tags korrigieren), ohne mir mitzuteilen, was man hätte besser machen können bzw. müssen. Denn m.E. lernt man durch das Nachlesen im wiki und die Fehlerbehebung künftige Fehler beim Mappen zu vermeiden. Aus diesem Grund meine nur gut gemeinten Hinweise.
TornadoFang (2026-04-24 07:05:12+00:00): Alles cool. Soll ich den Weg nun entfernen? Ich kartiere diese, um Inklusion zu fördern, also Blinden Hilfe zu kartieren usw.
habi (2026-04-16 16:00:56+00:00): Situation passt so genau :)
Piagno (2026-04-16 16:48:10+00:00): merci der rückmeldung ;)
NeisBot (2026-04-15 17:57:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13731457271 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Delivery service"

#MapWithoutSpam
Udarian (2026-04-15 20:04:55+00:00): whats your source that this is a power plant?

happy mapping,
Udar.
ErlendHH (2026-04-15 21:33:21+00:00): Hi Udar,

It's  visible on Google Maps, and I specialize in floating pv systems so I am familiar with how they look.

Best,
Erlend
bxl-forever (2026-04-16 10:31:33+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thanks for wanting to improve railway mapping.  However, it would have been better to request some help before doing this yourself.

Mapping railways and assigning objects to the correct relation is one of the most complicated tasks on OpenStreetMap.  It is close to impossible to do correctly with simple tools like the iD online edit you have used.

Now, we have broken route relations, U-shaped platforms like here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1303242944, area tags on a multipolygon and objects missing from stop_area relations in Profonsart.

I will ask someone to review this and fix asap, we cannot leave the map in such a bad state.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-04-16 03:35:31+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم القيام بتعديلات استناداً إلى قوقل وهذه التغييرات تم استردادها:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181393497
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-04-16 03:36:29+00:00): قيامك بالتعديل بشكل متكرر وعدم الاستجابة يؤدي لحظر حسابكم، لذا نرجوا الالتزام بتعليمات المساهمة وعدم مخالفتها
JanezPavelZebovec (2026-04-15 19:50:34+00:00): Pozdravljeni"
Opazil sem, da ste za stavbo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1499689022 kopiral oznake bližnje zgradbe, med drugim tudi ref:gurs:sta_sid=22428331	 in source:geometry=GURS, ki se nanašata na uvoz državnih podatkov zgradb in pomenita identifikacijsko številko zgradbe na GURS-u, ki jo ima vsaka zgradba (ki jo ima GURS v svojih podatkih ob uvozu) svojo; druga oznaka pa se nanaša na dejstvo, da je oblika zgradbe (geometry) uvožena iz GURS-ovih podatkov, kar vaša novo vrisana zgradba ni. Prosim, ne kopirajte oznak drugih zgradb na novo vrisane zgradbe, raje izberite ustrezno vrsto zgradbe v iskalnem polju.
Vedno lahko odprete tudi novo temo na https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/si/76, kjer vam z veseljem pomagamo.
Še veliko veselja pri urejanju!
bazicek (2026-04-16 05:28:33+00:00): Hvala za opozorilo