piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-19 12:40:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/787258795
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1071286489
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1071286520

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2023-03-05 15:39:02+00:00): Hello, Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please read the info on the instructions about tagging of tracks.
In urban areas, tracks are not to be used.
Please read the wiki. Highways.
Best regards and keep mapping
Noktoborus (2023-04-20 09:55:24+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Каким приложением для навигации Вы пользуетесь?

Участок объекта https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297480269 сливающийся с улицей Ленинградян после перекрёстка не существует. На участке слияния полос движения 4,  из которых запрещено перестроение с первой полосы.

Корректно маппить данный участок используя тег change:lanes	 , а не разделение дорог.
Noktoborus (2023-05-04 08:02:34+00:00): Переразметил перекрёсток под предыдущий вариант и добавил запреты движения со съезда с шоссе Цицернакаберд на улицу Алабяна. Если у Вас возникнут проблемы с маршрутизацией, напишите, пожалуйста.
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Frans S (2023-02-19 17:06:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
You did not read the messages on this project, didn't you? I is worth to check them .Otherwise, you should have seen this message.

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. How do you map such a building? Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint. Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

I am invalidating this task, so you can adjust the high buildings if you have the time for it.
Best regards.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132746384
qugeb (2023-02-19 12:49:04+00:00): Link dazu https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/abschaltung-aller-offentlichen-telefone-in-de-ist-fur-anfang-2023-geplant/4712/75
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Warin61 (2023-02-21 06:12:37+00:00): Hi,
The relationship 15509013 Vibrance Studios is wrong - the inner way touches the outer. It would have been better left as it was -a simple way. Do you want me to fix this?
CrazyKim117 (2023-02-21 07:05:14+00:00): Thank you for bringing this to my attention. if you would like to make the changes yourself, please feel free to do so. 
Kim
tbicr (2023-02-20 23:01:16+00:00): Вітаю, хацеў удакладніць што па-беларуску Даўгатэрміновы Агнявы Пункт - кропка больш тычыцца пунктуацыі, дзякуй за Ваш уклад у ОСМ
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-19 13:00:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364826554

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2023-02-19 13:30:49+00:00): Hi again :)
(yes, I'm looking at your work, deal with it)

I'd like to offer this link to the wiki regarding your work on the zebra crossings. Work I regard as very important and I thank you for your tireless efforts.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing

It says there that the node where the footway (or similar) crosses the way of the road needs to be tagged according to the wiki. Maybe you would like to keep that in mind, when mapping crossings.

Thanks and cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132746678
Brainus (2023-02-20 14:44:42+00:00): I've nothing to hide - so for me there's no problem in having my work supervised by you ;-)

Believe me - I allways take a look in the wiki, before I start mapping. In this case the documentation was a bit conflicting - the wiki about tag "highway=crossing" says crossings have to be a "node" and the wiki about the key "crossing" says it can be a "node" and/or "way"...
So my initial decision was to chosoe ways, to show the dimensions...
I've just changed that - so now all zebracrossings on mainstreet of Punta Mujeres are nodes and descriped precisely. :-)

See: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132794005
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-19 13:10:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/943997981
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/943997982

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Dave Venables (2023-02-19 13:42:38+00:00): The Spot A and The Spot B still listed on the priority post box finder https://www.royalmail.com/services-near-you#/results?postcode=DE1%202HR&latitude=52.918802&longitude=-1.475191&searchRadius=40&count=7&filters=&officeType=postboxes

Have checked on the ground and can see the rough surface on the pavement where the two pillar boxes were

Don't think that they we will returned as they are very near the main post office https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3530542504  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129320971
Dave Venables (2023-02-20 13:00:58+00:00): Removal based on surveys by me on foot and did not use the incorrect, (probably not open data), information on the Royal Mail priority postbox finder (set up to help people locate postboxes for returning Covid 19 test samples).

Concerning how out of date the details are, but at least OpenStreetMap is available with correct details
https://www.royalmail.com/services-near-you/postbox/the-spot-a-de1-2hr/0000DE1750
https://www.royalmail.com/services-near-you/postbox/the-spot-b-de1-2hr/0000DE1104
dcapillae (2023-02-19 13:54:57+00:00): Buenas tardes.

Gracias por los cambios.

«Dombeya» es un género de plantas. Por favor, no use la etiqueta  «name=*» para el género ni para la especie de una planta. Si desea especificar el género o la especie, use la etiqueta «genus=*» o  «species=*» respectivamente.

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
esaulenka (2023-03-07 14:41:23+00:00): Здравствуйте,
Пожалуйста, не используйте данные яндекса, т.к. они не давали разрешения на это.
Карты/спутниковые снимки можно использовать, только если их владелец дал разрешение в явном виде.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Frans S (2023-02-20 10:48:34+00:00): Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Best regards and keep mapping
dcapillae (2023-02-19 13:45:57+00:00): Buenas tardes.

Gracias por los cambios.

Por favor, no use la etiqueta «name=*» para describir cosas: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things. Evite usar «Banco» como nombre de un banco o «Papelera» como nombre de una papelera.

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
eggie (2023-02-19 14:08:59+00:00): Hi..
You are sure this is a wilderness hut?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dwilderness_hut

Perhaps a shelter?

Greetz
eggie
eggie (2023-02-19 14:32:52+00:00): Removed wilderness_hut  No sign of it.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2023-02-19 21:28:10+00:00): camp_site changed into chalet
gr eggie
eggie (2023-02-19 15:07:31+00:00): Dag Pasha. Een adresnode is in ieder geval geen landuse=construction.
Dat heb ik verwijderd

Is dit gebouw gesloopt?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-19 15:09:20+00:00): Wanneer iets niet meer klopt graag een terugmelding doen naar de BAG  Dat kan hier

https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=storkstraat%2012&resultOffset=0&objectId=0327100000253626&geometry.x=157476.392&geometry.y=461720.89700172&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0327010000289757
eggie (2023-02-19 21:19:51+00:00): Tip .. Wanneer er wordt gebouwd kun je een vlak landuse=construction toevoegen over het complex.
MVG
eggie
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Milaviy4 (2023-02-19 14:17:23+00:00): It's not??? So the satellite images are fake? Or did the goverment carved this route and destroyed fields and forests for no reason??? Please provide a source of  somekind
foreigner037 (2023-02-19 14:32:06+00:00): It's kind of complicated really. Construction started without a start of construction act issued and what has been done was classified as illegal. The land wasn't even expropriated, which has been done now. This is a big problem, since construction cannot "start" without first solving the legal issues. As of today, a news arcticle was posted on the official government site, hinting that what has been done on lot 5 will be demolished to start over, while lot 4 remains suspended indefinitely. You can read more about that here (with google translate)

https://www.mrrb.bg/bg/ministur-shishkov-chastta-ot-am-hemus-ot-sofiya-do-yana-po-malko-asfalt-poveche-shlaka/
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
eggie (2023-02-19 14:43:21+00:00): Dag hg  Je vraagt feedback..  Lijkt me inderdaad beter zo.

MVG
eggie
Andrea Musuruane (2023-02-19 17:38:23+00:00): Ciao. Mi spieghi perché questa strada è stata riclassificata come trunk? Non è una strada a scorrimento veloce, non ha corsie separate e soprattutto il traffico non è riservato esclusivamente ai veicoli a motore. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132749397
fedc (2023-02-19 17:46:10+00:00): Ciao, certo che è a scorrimento veloce e senza incroci a raso, come no?
Andrea Musuruane (2023-02-19 17:52:48+00:00): Guarda che il non avere incroci a raso, non è l'unico requisito per essere una trunk. Ad esempio, un requisito è che ci debba essere il cartello di   "strada riservata ai veicoli a motore". E lì non c'è. Ciao, Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2023-02-20 16:39:12+00:00): Reverted.
joost schouppe (2023-02-21 09:34:52+00:00): Volgens de website die je er zelf aan toevoegt heet het hier "Het Moeras / FelixArtsite", in de tekst noemen ze het gewoon het Moeras. Mij lijkt het precies toch logischer om enkel het museum-gebouw als museum aan te duiden, want het lijkt toch niet dat het natuurgebied echt als museum gebruikt wordt. Bovendien zijn er geen openingsuren of toegangsgeld, wat voor het museum zelf wel geldt.
JhowieNitnek (2023-02-21 19:15:31+00:00): Hi,
Ik denk dat je gelijk hebt ik zal het direct aanpassen
JhowieNitnek (2023-02-21 19:42:51+00:00): Het is aangepast
joost schouppe (2023-02-21 20:45:06+00:00): Merci Jhowie!
eggie (2023-02-19 21:03:11+00:00): Dag mdavids.. Je vraagt feedback

Tip in ieder geval niet als camping... 

Zie hier even een voorbeeld van een camperplaats 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.85858/4.67684

De doelgroep is van belang..
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-19 21:16:48+00:00): Even wat aangepast zodat het niet als een reguliere camping wordt gezien..

MVG
eggie
mdavids (2023-02-20 11:11:44+00:00): Dankjewel!
ianlopez1115 (2023-02-20 15:19:43+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset
MxxCon (2023-02-19 23:01:48+00:00): Hello.
I see that in many places you've been adding crossing=unmarked. I'm not sure if this is correct to map them. Streets are intended to be crossed where there's a crosswalk. If you map unmarked crosswalks then logically speaking 100% of the area between 2 parallel sidewalks should be marked as unmarked crosswalk since you can cross the street at any point.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132750938
Itserpol (2023-02-19 23:37:35+00:00): Actually, I'm only adding unmarked crosswalks where there are curb cutouts on opposite sides of the unmarked street, indicating that pedestrians are able to cross. If that is not the intent of the cutouts, then I can remove the crosswalks.
MxxCon (2023-02-19 23:43:06+00:00): I'm not sure if curb cutouts is an endorsement by DoT that people can cross there.
At the very least I think we definitely shouldn't tag unmarked crosswalks where there are 3 marked and 1 unmarked on an intersection.
jmapb (2023-03-01 13:43:40+00:00): `"Crosswalk" shall mean that part of a roadway, whether marked or unmarked, which is included within the extension of the sidewalk lines between opposite sides of the roadway at an intersection`

Per https://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/hwyrules.pdf , that's what NYC DOT thinks. Crosswalks don't require markings or curb-cut ramps. They don't even *follow* the markings or ramp cutouts -- they follow the line of the sidewalk.
jmapb (2023-03-03 01:07:29+00:00): Slightly more specific text from https://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/trafrule.pdf --

(i) Marked crosswalk. The term “marked crosswalk” means that part of a roadway defined
by two parallel lines or highlighted by a pattern of lines (perpendicular, parallel or diagonal
used either separately or in combination) that is intended to guide pedestrians into proper
crossing paths.
(ii) Unmarked crosswalk. The term “unmarked crosswalk” means that part of a roadway,
other than a marked crosswalk, that is included within the extensions of the sidewalk lines
between opposite sides of the roadway at an intersection, provided that (A) the roadway
crosses through the intersection rather than ending at the intersection, and/or (B) all traffic
on the opposing roadway is controlled by a traffic control device.

The way I'm reading this, an "unmarked crossing" is valid (curb ramps or no) if all of the following conditions are met:
a) There are no crosswalk markings.
b) It's at a "+" intersection, not at "T" intersection.
c) The sidewalk continues on the other side of the intersection.
d) The intersection features a stop light or stop sign controlling traffic on the road being crossed.

Offhand I'd say this is a much saner definition than the one in https://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/hwyrules.pdf ... and on closer reading the context there is newsrack regulations, not pedestrian traffic.
Sarogun351 (2023-02-19 14:37:47+00:00): UWAGA! Przystanki w większości nie mają nazw, ponieważ problem w tym że ja nie znam takowych. Informujcie mnie jeśli są jakieś błędy.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
GUFSZ (2023-02-19 14:44:10+00:00): POI eingetragen. Ortskenntnis
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
ianlopez1115 (2023-02-20 15:19:51+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
ianlopez1115 (2023-02-20 15:19:56+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset
ianlopez1115 (2023-02-20 15:20:16+00:00): *[Santiago, Isabela]

See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset
eggie (2023-02-19 17:03:24+00:00): Dag Derkzen

Dit zijn je edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132751409#map=17/52.40989/4.67702

Wanneer oneway=yes komt te vervallen dan ook de uitzonderingen voor tweewielers verwijderen
Wanneer een weg oneway=yes wort getagd zal er meestal een uitzondering voor tweewielers gelden. Nu zal het wellicht niet meer juist routeren hier. Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-19 17:11:47+00:00): Waarom access=no op een wandelpadverbinding?  Verboden Toegang Molensloot?
Het geheel zit nu vol met foutmeldingen hier. Graag reactie
eggie (2023-02-19 17:17:33+00:00): Oostkolk wandelpad 30 km/u maxspeed. Zou dat kloppen.
Kijk nog even.
eggie (2023-02-19 17:20:12+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk..  
Nog iets 

bruggedeelte Pol oneway yes.. De rest van de wegen is oneway=no  

Westelijk gedeelte ook nog op de brug en de aansluiting oneway=yes 
De rest oneway=no..  Zou dat kunnen kloppen?
eggie (2023-02-19 17:40:25+00:00): Op de oostelijke oever de uitzonderingen voor   tweewielers toegevoegd.
access=no verwijderd van pad. Zal vast niet verboden toegang zijn. 
Nu highway=path Er staat geen bord G7 voor wandelpad. Routeert dus ook voor fietsers. 
Hoe het zal zijn bij de Pol zul je zelf het beste weten, maar die stukken oneway =yes icm die oneway=no blijft vreemd. 

MVG
eggie
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Strubbl (2024-09-28 12:26:49+00:00): Hi daganzdaanda,
weißt du ob die Abteilung für Schmerztherapie hier noch existiert?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10678496287

Auf der Website gibt es den Fachbereich nicht mehr zu wählen.

Viele Grüße
daganzdaanda (2024-09-29 22:25:50+00:00): Hi Strubbl,

ich weiß es leider nicht, ich war länger nicht mehr da. Kann gut sein, dass die Abteilung geschlossen ist oder vielleicht umgenannt wurde. 
-> "Survey needed" :-)

Servus, daganzdaanda
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
GUFSZ (2023-02-19 15:00:54+00:00): POI auf leisure=wellness gesetzt
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].