piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
johnny-park (2026-05-03 20:21:23+00:00): Ich habe es jetzt wieder auf bicycle=yes zurückgeändert. Danke für die gute Diskussion und die Tipps.
felipeeugenio (2026-04-29 11:52:47+00:00): Hola. Los nombres antiguos van en old_name=

Ya lo corregí

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181960374
ivanbranco (2026-04-29 02:35:10+00:00): Hi emilthaug,

I guess you uploaded that Panoramax image by mistake?
MassCartog (2026-05-01 18:04:44+00:00): Hi welcome back to OSM. You might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. 

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Looks like you removed it in the past, and it was just added back since it exists on the ground. This is one of the reasons we don't just remove trails. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access. 

I went ahead and updated the access tag for an example.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
Lezurex (2026-04-30 09:32:44+00:00): Hallo u_li_pe,

Willkommen auf OpenStreetMap und danke für deinen Beitrag!

In dem Fall hier wäre es wahrscheinlich besser, wenn du den Tag vehicle=no einfach entfernen würdest, statt motor_vehicle=yes hinzuzufügen, weil ja anscheinend grundsätzlich alle Fahrzeuge erlaubt sind. Sonst wäre z.B. eine Kutsche immer noch ausgeschlossen.

LG Lezurex
u_li_pe (2026-04-30 11:15:36+00:00): Danke, das hatte ich noch nicht geschafft (neu hier ...). Hab es jetzt so gemacht, changeset 182028447.
Lezurex (2026-04-30 11:19:46+00:00): Ja so passts, perfekt :D
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-29 07:12:37+00:00): Hi MIKEL QP, welcome to OSM.

You created several duplicate buildings here.

Best regards.
JJIglesias (2026-04-30 06:16:24+00:00): Las correcciones ya las hice yo. Pero crean problemas al duplicar elementos
RunningDroid (2026-06-09 20:23:12+00:00): Update: the demolition is complete, I guessed correctly
söm4324 (2026-05-28 05:21:06+00:00): Hallo seafoxx,  einige Änderungen in diesem Änderungssatz zeigen ein Problem. Und zwar überschneiden sich die folgenden zwei Straßen im westlichen Abschnitt.:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391058074/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32685015/history

Das führt zu Fehlermeldungen. Zusätzlich hat  eine Straße von beiden Busrouten, ist aber als access=no gekennzeichnet. Das klingt unplausibel. Kannst du bitte noch einmal drauf schauen und korrigieren bzw. sagen, wie es vor Ort tatsächlich aussieht? Bilder wenn möglich sind immer hilfreich.

Viele Grüße
CAM-Gerlach (2026-04-29 13:14:03+00:00): Hey, thanks for updating this! NB, a bot will come around and fix it, but just FYI standard format for US phone numbers on OSM is +1-NNN-NNN-NNNN (+1 NNN-NNN-NNNN is also widely used, and +1 NNN NNN NNNN sees some use, both of which are acceptable alternatives)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181961856
gregorywpower (2026-04-30 17:47:49+00:00): Thanks CAM-Gerlach! I'll be sure to add phone numbers in this format moving forward. I wasn't sure if adding spaces or hyphens was easier to parse for applications.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-01 15:50:25+00:00): Thanks!
ajmat (2026-04-29 04:33:20+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 181968461
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 10:59:39+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, possibly sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184131422

https://osm.org/changeset/184131422
pwbriggs (2026-04-29 03:48:59+00:00): Thanks for the edit and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Please let us know if you have any questions. https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ is also a great resource if you're unsure how to map something.
Magneto555 (2026-04-28 23:05:01+00:00): This revert restores several objects where building=yes had been replaced with landuse=residential.
According to the OSM wiki, these tags represent different concepts and should not be used interchangeably.

The Buildings wiki page states that “the most basic use of the tag is building=yes, which means any kind of building”, and that “a single building outline should be created for each building.”  
building=* describes the physical footprint of a structure, while landuse=residential describes the residential land area that may contain multiple buildings.

A building tag cannot be replaced with a landuse tag, because a building is a physical structure and a landuse area represents the use of the surrounding land. They must be mapped as separate objects.

For that reason, I'm reverting the changeset 181939764.
Magneto555 (2026-04-28 23:27:03+00:00): Furthermore, the purpose of this kind of mapping is simply to provide a general outline that can later be refined by drawing the actual building footprints.
iandees (2026-04-29 00:09:31+00:00): Hi! It looks like the website URL on node/9959057497 may have been copied from Google Maps (it contained Google tracking parameters). Please be careful not to copy information from Google into OpenStreetMap, as Google's data is copyrighted.
Zol87 (2026-04-29 00:20:15+00:00): Thanks, for catching my mistake. I am usually very careful to remove trackers from the ends of the links.
JJIglesias (2026-04-28 23:37:07+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
Joseph R P (2026-04-29 00:29:01+00:00): The rest of 89A could probably keep its motorway designation here since it's only one at-grade intersection in between multiple freeway interchanges. The intersection itself also is so insignificant that it almost doesn't count, considering it is a dead-end road that only leads to storage tanks, thus logically only maintenance vehicles would be using this road. If this road extended into one of the nearby developments or provided access to a publicly-accessible facility, houses, or businesses, meaning there would be regular in-and-out traffic, I think this intersection could be considered significant enough to affect the freeway continuity.

Additionally, please avoid using 'xx FUT' designations in the 'ref=*' key since it's not an official highway designation. This is always better suited for the 'fut_ref=*' key.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-04-29 13:47:26+00:00): So, should the entirety of SR 89A between SR 89 and Fain Road be re-upgraded to highway=motorway? If that's the case, how should I tag Great Western Drive?
Joseph R P (2026-04-29 14:15:09+00:00): Great Western Dr could remain tagged as-is. It's theoretically a public road despite the likely scenario that little to no public traffic uses it on a daily basis.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-04-29 14:26:18+00:00): I see. Well, I found out that, while editing SR 89A, there is a "No left turn" restriction from SR 89A westbound to Great Western Drive, even though Esri shows a left turning lane.
Joseph R P (2026-04-29 14:38:04+00:00): IIRC the left turn lanes used to be mapped as separate links and I'm assuming the turn restriction is just leftover from when they were deleted.
iandees (2026-04-29 00:09:28+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11811328927 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181964294, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
TimK MSI (2026-04-29 01:58:29+00:00): Thanks for letting me know! :)
JJIglesias (2026-04-28 23:36:41+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
Adikso (2026-04-29 18:17:25+00:00): Zacznij pisać opisy zestawów zmian. Takie opisy są nieakceptowalne.
b-jazz (2026-04-30 15:19:57+00:00): FYI, you're not creating multipolygons correctly. I'm not exactly sure how you're doing it. You should be selecting both the fairway and the green and the same time and merging them together. Somehow you are created TWO multipolygons with single members instead of ONE multipolygon with two members. Happy to help you figure this out.
JJIglesias (2026-04-28 23:40:11+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
iandees (2026-04-29 00:09:38+00:00): Hi! It looks like the website URL on node/10858076543 may have been copied from Google Maps (it contained Google tracking parameters). Please be careful not to copy information from Google into OpenStreetMap, as Google's data is copyrighted.
LordGarySugar (2026-05-21 02:14:25+00:00): Hi, I have made a few corrections to your edits. Please take note of the following:
It isn't always necessary to add separate roads for turn lanes - this should only be done if they are separated from the main road by bollards or kerbs. You shouldn't use highway=motorway_link either, this is only for highway on-ramps.
When you draw roads or driveways crossing sidewalks, you should ensure that they are connected where they intersect.
highway=residential should not be used for very minor roads like driveways to houses or in car parks - use highway=service instead.
If you have any questions or need any help, feel free to ask.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-29 07:08:44+00:00): Hi Mohammad Khaled Sabbah, welcome to OSM.

IMHO some of your changed highway=* tags looks that they are not correct.

Best regards.
tyfi (2026-04-29 00:07:27+00:00): Waiting on updated imagery, but this has been in the works for a few years now
greatnameguys2472 (2026-06-22 18:20:13+00:00): New imagery, aligned building
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-29 07:06:19+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Is the following name real "line2"?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/622461662
gmar5 (2026-05-01 12:03:03+00:00): Ciao. Perché hai rimosso la label per Forcola? Non è corretto renderlo come alt_name di Sirta.
user_10901495 (2026-05-01 12:23:02+00:00): Salve, in primo luogo, mi spieghi più nel dettaglio perché secondo lei non è corretto.
Mi sembrava più giusto in quanto la località di Forcola non esiste ma è semplicemente il nome del comune.
Se vuole che ripristini l'elemento di Forcola procedo assolutamente senza nessun problema.

Cordiali saluti,
Martino Scaglione
ivanbranco (2026-05-01 13:43:07+00:00): Ciao Martino,

nel 2021 ti invitai a una discussione in mailing list sui comuni sparsi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113368974

il consenso fu quello di mappare la label dei comuni sparsi come place=municipality: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2021-November/073085.html

ora dopo quattro anni stai ri-cancellando gli stessi elementi. è cambiato il consenso?
user_10901495 (2026-05-01 13:58:30+00:00): Ciao Ivan,

non mi risulta di star cancellando nulla tranne il nodo di Forcola che era perfettamente adeguato anche come alt_name di Sirta.

In secondo luogo, ho già detto che non c'è nessun problema se c'è bisogno che ripristini la situazione precedente.

Cordiali saluti,
Martino Scaglione
user_10901495 (2026-05-01 15:33:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182080486
felipeeugenio (2026-04-29 11:44:31+00:00): Hola. Es un pasaje privado?
Para corregirlo, porque customers es para otro tipo de camino.
Saludos
salma_z (2026-04-29 09:14:28+00:00): Hello shhamza104, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
I noticed your recent edits regarding buildings and roads, but I would like to point out some technical issues that need to be corrected to follow OSM standards:

(Building Shapes & Imagery): The buildings you've drawn do not match the satellite imagery in terms of shape or scale. Please ensure that all features are traced accurately based on available imagery.

( Incorrect use of the Name tag): The name=* tag should only contain the actual name of the building or street. Large numbers or codes should not be placed here.
Reference: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name

(Geocode Issues): The geocodes you are adding to nodes are incorrect and misplaced. OSM generates its own location data; manually adding random codes to tags is not standard practice.
Reference: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref (If these are reference numbers).

( Road Overlapping): Some roads are overlapping with buildings or other roads. In OSM, the network should be clean and connected properly without unnecessary overlaps.
Reference: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group/OSM_object_filter_guide/Overlapping_Objects

(Changeset Comments): When saving your edits, please provide a clear and descriptive comment about what you have done. Using unclear characters like "ش ح" makes it difficult for other mappers to understand your changes. A good comment should explain what was added or modified.
Reference: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Please go back and review these edits, and kindly correct them to match the imagery and follow the proper tagging standards. You can use the LearnOSM.org guide for help.
We appreciate your enthusiasm and want to help you contribute high-quality data to the map.

Best regards,
salma_z
woodpeck (2026-04-29 07:34:29+00:00): Thank you for deleting this undiscussed import again. Please remember that if you want to upload this third-party data source to OSM, you have to go through the import process https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import which mandates prior discussion with the community.
vectorial8192 (2026-05-01 04:36:07+00:00): Hi there

It seems you used Bing imagery for OSM editing. Bing imagery is generally not recommended for OSM editing (at least for Hong Kong) because of their geographic inaccuracy. When needing to confirm geographic locations, consider cross-checking with e.g. ESRI Clarity, which is usually the most geographically accurate.
kingkingHK (2026-05-01 08:04:07+00:00): Indeed.

Additionally, for areas as old as this, out-of-copyright maps are also a great option for cross-checking. It is not common for other data sources to perform better than government maps.
vbertola (2026-05-01 08:23:22+00:00): Understood, thanks. Unfortunately Esri Clarity was too blurry when I started so I defaulted to Bing, but I will change. Still, I noticed that often around HK the map is not well aligned with the position marked by my phone, there's often several metres of difference, so there might be an issue of general alignment somewhere.
kingkingHK (2026-05-01 08:51:48+00:00): Esri (not Esri Clarity) should be clearer and more accurate than Bing.

A few meters is well within the normal error of a smartphone GPS. The general alignment issue is very likely to be an issue (or just hardware limitation) with your phone. Try walking a few hundred meters and see how noisy phone GPS paths are.
vectorial8192 (2026-05-01 11:04:14+00:00): (um why are we suddenly mentioning government maps...)

I won't fully discredit the "phone GPS does not match map coordinates" observation because that's something I also observe, but I do not have conclusive finding/suggestions as to whether this is "real" and applies to entire Hong Kong, or how exactly may we obtain the real coordinates from aerial imagery.

Nothing personal, just that, procedurally, we prefer not using Bing imagery.
vbertola (2026-05-01 11:26:30+00:00): For today's changes I used Esri (you don't seem to agree whether Esri or Esri Clarity is better). E.g. the Mini Great Wall on Cheung Chau was clearly off mark, not just because of phone fixes. It was off mark with all imagery (though in different ways) and with my phone. Esri even seemed to have a misaligned ortophoto tile transition midway. Anyway, I decided that there were enough factors vouching for a correction, hope it works.
kingkingHK (2026-05-01 12:24:35+00:00): (I mentioned out-of-copyright maps as an easy way to get correct geometry, not sure how @vectorial8192 couldn't comprehend that)

Relative accuracy should be more important than absolute. Even if there is really some distortion in osm data, as long as they are relatively uniform and small, it should not make a difference.

But, specifically re @vbertola's Cheung Chau example, it's a hilly area, so you should not expect any imagery to be accurate.
joost schouppe (2026-05-26 08:57:28+00:00): Any idea what happens to all the little shops inside? In a sense it's still a shop=mall if they keep operating.
bxl-forever (2026-05-27 22:51:39+00:00): You are right.  I saw an article in a newspaper today announcing that more than 80% of the retail space of all the 7 former malls has been reallocated, and promising that more shops are coming over the next months along with a renovation of those spaces.
I think it will be worth retagging it as a shop=mall, with no obvious name for the moment.  And plan a survey to update shop information here.
rarad74 (2026-04-29 06:37:47+00:00): Hi. Please add romanian diacritics for names, even if you find them edited by other user. Thanks.
DauphinLake (2026-04-29 15:11:32+00:00): Hi rarad74,
Thank you for letting me know, I will keep that in mind and defer to your edits.
Mxdanger (2026-06-03 21:19:11+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183614522
Mxdanger (2026-06-03 21:19:08+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183614522
Mxdanger (2026-06-03 21:19:05+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183614522
mavl (2026-04-30 16:50:48+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет дорогу класса highway=secondary  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1505435825  
  
Такой дороги здесь нет. Улица уже обозначена:  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/821916821  
  
О статусах дорог можно почитать в документации:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway
BC168 (2026-04-29 12:34:00+00:00): Das ganze *Gebäude* heißt "NEBELWAENDE"? Vermutlich eher nicht, oder? Wenn das der Name eines dort ansässigen Unternehmens ist, bitte einen entsprechend getaggten Node setzen.
Glassman (2026-04-30 00:20:47+00:00): #TIP: before using information from websites, make sure that the information isn't copyrighted. Since these are mountain peak names, I'd assume the information is public.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181968290
user_8655426 (2026-05-18 09:40:07+00:00): こんにちは。
どちらでもよいと思いますが、タリーズコーヒーのノード(ポイント)のタグを KANNON COFFEE の情報に書き換えるのが「グッドプラクティス」です。

・JA:Keep the history (履歴を残す)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Keep_the_history
・JA:グッドプラクティス
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:グッドプラクティス#履歴を残す

これまでに入力された情報は記録されているので、編集後にノード:  2063877376 の履歴を見たときに、以前はタリーズコーヒーだったことがわかるようになります。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2063877376/history
タリーズコーヒーに関するデータは、すべて KANNON COFFEE のものに書き換え、または削除するのを忘れないでください。

なお、日本の住所のタグ付け方法は、数年前にルールが変更になっています。現行のルールですと以下のようになります。

addr:province = 愛知県
addr:city = 名古屋市
addr:suburb = 中区
addr:neighbourhood = 栄二丁目
addr:block_number = 2
addr:housenumber = 5

OSM Wiki でご確認をお願いいたします。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:住所#日本の住所体系(街区番号・地籍転用)
rempshaener (2026-04-29 18:32:27+00:00): Hallo,
wie bereits mehrfach angekündigt, habe ich jetzt die Hydranten mit name korrigiert.
Dabei gibt es folgende Fallgruppen:
1. Trivialbeschreibungen, die sich ohnehin aus dem Kontext ergeben, beispielsweise „Campingplatz Nordzufahrt“; diese habe ich gelöscht.
2. andere Beschreibungen: nach description verschoben
3. Namen natürlicher Personen: gelöscht.
4. Sonstige unklare Werte: fixme ergänzt
Viele Grüße
ieguy3 (2026-04-29 04:31:43+00:00): https://www.rctc.org/doing-business/property/
ieguy3 (2026-04-29 04:32:50+00:00): the industrial land i marked along Placentia is rctc forgot to add source
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-29 07:05:03+00:00): Hi Обухова, welcome to OSM.

I think you have added the same road twice, see:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1505467094
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1505467095

Best regards
iandees (2026-04-29 12:55:28+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13525031038 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181987365, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
iandees (2026-04-29 12:55:46+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9710121765 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181987374, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-23 05:56:33+00:00): Reverted due SEO spam: surveillance camera distributor mistagged as an actual surveillance camera

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183051452
eggie (2026-04-29 07:56:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-29 16:38:20+00:00): o który podobny węzeł chodzi?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-29 16:40:22+00:00): I o którą część https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway=motorway_link chodzi?
ZgolBoi (2026-04-29 19:04:49+00:00): już nic, mozesz zrevertować, po prostu dał zły argument przy revercie, cjodzilo o dozwolony ruch pieszo rowerowy
mavl (2026-06-07 06:02:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183764451, 183764460, 183764431, 183764453, 183764448, 183764459, 183764455 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20768].
arjunaraoc (2026-05-09 14:15:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181970105
grzegorz75jan (2026-04-29 10:08:16+00:00): Co to jest ?
Popatrz jakiego potworka stworzyłeś https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5570923086

To jest przejście czy szlaban i w którym miejscu ma być.