piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Rodrigo Rega (2024-01-21 20:37:23+00:00): Boas. Acabo de leer a wiki [1] de novo, e non pon que un asentamento de dúas ou menos casas ten que ser obligatoriamente Isolated_dwelling. Así que creo que entendera eu mal o concepto. Sabendo esto, parece que as túas edicións son correctas. O tema do hórreo creo que xa sei o que pasou: borráchelo nodo para logo debuxalo como área (esto fixéchelo con algún outro) e o final quedou sen dibuxar. Así que supoño que solo sería erro humano. De todas maneiras, é recomendable que cando se pase un POI a área, conservar o nodo orixinal como un nodo da propia área, de este modo mantense o histórico do POI orixinal. Gracias por atender as miñas movidas! ;)

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:place%3Disolated_dwelling
Filip009 (2024-01-13 20:55:56+00:00): Zdravím, pre spravoúhlenie budovy, alebo aj športového ihriska je klávesová skratka Q, alebo po kliknutí pravím tlačidlom myši sa táto možnosť objaví. Prosím opravte si to.
Henten Človek (2024-01-14 10:46:55+00:00): dakujem
mcliquid (2024-01-12 17:26:12+00:00): Aus Billa Plus wird im ganzen Ländle ein Sutterlüty: https://vorarlberg.orf.at/stories/3221925/
Harry Wood (2024-04-30 09:17:26+00:00): In this changeset you added a natural=beach node in the middle of a Wistow Cafe Bistro car park: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11509255096/history Was that a mistake?
archie (2024-01-11 19:58:59+00:00): Bara en återkoppling. Parkeringsplatsen har du placerat exakt var den skall vara!
CaldeiraG (2024-01-12 09:17:31+00:00): Bom dia Chikari, reparei que estás a edificar o Montijo exclusivamente com as imagens do Bing que tem um pequeno offset em relação às ortofotos da DGT (2018/2014)

Sugiro que alinhes os edifícios que criaste até agora de acordo com as imagens de 2014 (de melhor qualidade), provavelmente só deves conseguir carregar essas imagens no JOSM infelizmente.

Continuação de bom trabalho e cumprimentos,
CaldeiraG
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146156268
Chyiri (2024-01-21 15:30:25+00:00): Bom dia e desculpa a demora!

Tenho utilizado as imagens do Bing desde que comecei a editar o mapa da cidade do Montijo (basicamente a parte ocidental toda da cidade) pois permite um melhor mapeamento micro e as imagens são mais recentes.

Alguma alternativa ao JOSM? Não me é possível aceder ao JOSM a partir do local onde costumo mapear.

Obrigado!
sanchi (2024-01-11 20:30:57+00:00): Buenas,
Ten cuidado con los datos que ya existen. En este conjunto de cambios se han perdido varios datos. 
Por una parte el polideportivo lo has dividido el edificio que representaba en edificio al que le has quitado propiedades como que es público y has pasado parte de las de deporte aunque no todas a un nodo. Eso es incorrecto.
Por otra parte ha pasado algo parecido con la guardia civil en la cual se ha perdido información.
Por favor ten cuidado con estas ediciones.
Un saludo.
Metzor (2024-01-11 21:26:19+00:00): Hi Cheeselover!

Welcome to OSM :-) Wonderful that you contribute here to improve the data!

One recommendation: Please make less changes per commit. This makes it so much easier to give you tips how to improve your mapping.

For instance, "tennis cort" probably does not qualify as name. It is a property ("tag") of the way you created. Feel free to click on the link below to find out how a fellow mapper improved your contribution.
The documentation on the naming can be found here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Documentation on tennis courts:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dtennis

Furthermore, to avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Metzor
zorglubu (2024-01-17 20:11:36+00:00): Hi Cheeselover,

It's very very important that you answer to messages sent by other mappers. Like the message obove.

You are really welcome to OpenStreetMap, but we are a community of contributors of all over the world. and we are able to work together because we listen to other contributors. And just saying, "hi, thank you for you remark, I will try to follow your advice" shows respect, and you will get respect in return.

Thank you to tell us that you have red and understood our messages :-)
Cheeselover (2024-01-17 20:16:11+00:00): ok I didn't respond to the messages because I just look at them and take the advice without really thinking that I needed to reply now I know that I have to reply I will do at the best of my abilities
zorglubu (2024-01-17 20:34:55+00:00): Thanks a lot for your answer. It's perfect !

And happy mapping with OSM !
Metzor (2024-01-17 20:44:44+00:00): Hi Cheeselover,

Happy to hear that you take the advice.

May I politely ask you to also correct the tagging of those two elements?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1238948260
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1238948261

The correct tagging instead of name=strawberries is:
crop=strawberry

Wiki on landuse links to crop:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmland

Wiki on crop lists the value strawberry:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crop

The documentation on the naming can be found here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Happy mapping!
Metzor

Hi zorglubu,

Thanks for the support!

Have a nice day/evening/...
Metzor
Cheeselover (2024-01-17 20:51:07+00:00): just did that also that one tennis court I know the person who owns it and they told me that it is okey to named the tennis court to tennis cort so is this like not allowed or something?
Metzor (2024-01-17 21:27:46+00:00): There is several aspects:
1) Tagging the feature as name and thus not tagging the feature (here: sports=tennis was missing to define the feature)
1.1) Map renderer evaluate those features to colorize the area if the tennis court in a certain way. No sports=tennis tag, no nice colouring.
1.2) OSM is so much more than just a map. For instance, one can evaluate the area of a city used for buildings vs. the area used for sports facilities. That only works if you tag it correctly.
1.3) It is an international project. Names cannot be translated automatically (and even with KI I doubt they ever will, at least safely). sports=tennis on the other hand can be easily translated by simple software.

2) Entering something that is not the correct name
2.1) When you search for locations, the wrong name might pop up and will be missleading
2.2) You walk as "illiterate" European through a Chineese city looking for the gym <add some Chineese signs>. What would help you more? An OSM map with the <add some Chineese signs> that you can compare to the (non-latin) signs on the buildings? Or a text "really cool gym" that you cannot compare to <add some Chineese signs>?
sanchi (2024-01-11 20:55:01+00:00): Hola
En este conjunto de cambios la mayoría de los cambios realizados tienen errores. Por favor ten cuidado y antes de ponerte a editar usa la wiki para aprender. Para la posición de las cosas lo más fiable en España es el PNOA.
Has movido una iglesia incorrectamente, has eliminado una calle que existe, caminos convertidos en vías de servicio sin serlo,...
Por favor ten cuidado con estas cosas, y si no sabes lee antes de editar, y si no conoces la zona no modifiques lo existente por lo que pueda parecer por una foto aérea.
Un saludo.
lefuturiste (2024-01-11 20:55:05+00:00): Hi, thanks for your changeset, so bad it spawn an entire continent 😂 😂
bxl-forever (2024-01-11 21:28:14+00:00): User added roads in Shangai and this rock in the north of Scotland: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1238944755

Changes in places far away from each other should be uploaded separately.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Metzor (2024-01-11 21:37:05+00:00): Hey lefuturiste,
I actually count three continents ;-)

Hey bxl-forever,
Thanks for the more constructive approach!

Hey Cheeselover,
Q.e.d about the courtesy remark in my comment of your previous changeset :-D

I wish you all happy mapping and a nice morning/day/evening
Metzor
lefuturiste (2024-01-11 22:02:36+00:00): Hey Metzor,
I'm joking, but here is a interesting video about continents from Jay Foreman.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrsxRJdwfM0
DiogoBaptista98 (2024-01-24 21:44:50+00:00): já existem vias desenhadas bastando alterar as tags mudando assim o estado das mesmas, não sei porque redenhou por cima, a situação foi corrigida
lololailo (2024-01-12 20:02:18+00:00): Hola jbtc, veo que estás quitando la etiqueta surface=ground a los caminos. Algunos de esos caminos creo que son de tierra, sobre todo los pequeños caminos. Otros creo que no son de tierra, seguramente de grava, podrias ir añadiendo la etiqueta surface=gravel en lugar de dejarlo vacio.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146157939
jbtc (2024-01-13 12:25:26+00:00): Hola Lololailo.
Como puedes ver en el historial, el usuario kapazao_import ha aplicado este criterio:"España. Corrección de vías etiquetadas con superficie "ground" y "grade1" o "grade2" > "grade3" (mínimo). superficie "unpaved" y "grade1" > "grade2" ".
También el prgograma Josm siempre avisa de combinación de etiquetas sospechosas entre surface ground y grade2 y por eso he suprimido ground.
Saludos.
lololailo (2024-01-13 20:30:42+00:00): Si creo que estamos de acuerdo, por eso te decía de mantener ground en los grade4 y en el resto como el camino de Campix y similares (que son grade2 o grade3) añadirle la surface=gravel o surface=compacted que según he leído en la wiki también puede valer. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dcompacted
Un saludo.
Glassman (2024-01-11 23:46:17+00:00): I think the road classification is correct, unclassified, but I'm concerned about the access=private. Are there signs posted to limit access to the road? If so, then access=private would be correct. 

Do you mean to show the road is privately owned and maintained? Then use operator= or ownership=private. Let me know if you have any questions or need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146158027
pslarkin (2024-01-12 01:00:23+00:00): I've added the owner key/tag and set it to private. I wasn't sure how to do it on this changeset. 

I believe there are signs. I see in the wiki that OSM doesn't give much credibility to government datasets, but as a government employee of this county I can assure you that this road is in fact not publicly owned. If you need evidence please see public roads here: 
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=9e4ce6f2a346453c8ec71c4eff6b9d5a
And land ownership here: https://cp.spokanecounty.org/scout/map/?PID=27276.9060
Barroszt (2024-01-20 23:14:21+00:00): To w końcu perony tramwajowe są oznaczane jako linia, czy obszar? :)
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-11 21:00:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8094573619
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/334555310

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SpinOff (2024-01-11 21:07:30+00:00): Adresy oznacza się albo poprzez umieszczenie punktu adresowego w obrysie budynku, lub dodaniu tagów adresowych do budynku. W momencie gdy dodałeś tagi do obiektu budynku, punkt adresowy stał się zbędny i należy go usunąć.
tomimaki (2024-01-12 10:06:48+00:00): Ok, dzięki za informację.
pyram (2024-12-04 10:48:26+00:00): Hi,

kannst Du dir das noch einmal anschauen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4508328
Du hast hier ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25385615 ) die Straße auf "60" beschränkt. Ist das (nur teilweise) so?
Andrea Musuruane (2024-01-12 10:50:06+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. Grazie per i tuoi contribuiti. Ho notato però un problema. Il sentiero https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1238952754 che hai inserito, interseca e si sovrappone in parte al sentiero https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/635726345. Non so com'è la situazione in zona, altrimenti avrei sistemato io. Ti consiglio inoltre di usare dei commenti più significativi alle tue modifiche (ad esempio, inserito percorso MTB Fly to Rocco dopo rilevamento). Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146158427
ValeBG (2024-01-12 19:10:49+00:00): Ho notato anch'io, ma sinceramente ero in bici e non ho notato quel sentiero, quindi non saprei proprio se c'è o no, sicuramente esiste quello che ho fatto io. È una nuova traccia molto bella in mtb. Riguardo al nome del commento ti ringrazio, lo tengo in considerazione per le prossime modifiche
BCNorwich (2024-01-13 08:09:39+00:00): Hi, You duplicated some sections of the highway by placing some of the footpath on top of existing highways. This disrupts routing. It's OSM practice to amend the existing features rather than mapping on top of or removing them.  

I've removed the duplicate sections and amended the existing highways.

Regards Bernard.
InsertUser (2024-01-22 16:59:20+00:00): What is your source for this name? It contradicts existing data.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146158617
VLD549 (2024-02-27 15:53:13+00:00): Hi, please explain where the name change comes from. I see two sources with respectively ESSO ZEVENBERGSCHEN HOEK (you missed the 'G' in the spelling) and Vissers Energy Den Hoek

1. https://www.esso.nl/nl-nl/find-station/esso-zevenbergsehoek-essozevenbergschenhoek-100301824

2. https://locatiefinder.vissersenergygroup.nl/#/?type=gas_station&searchtype=region&origin=Zevenbergschen%20Hoek&originLat=51.6731202&originLng=4.678272499999999
A67-A67 (2024-02-27 18:06:01+00:00): Fixed typo
PlayGuide (2024-02-24 22:06:22+00:00): Bonjour,
Au croisement des rues Jangot et du Capitaine Robert Cluzan, vous avez supprimé l'aire de jeux. Hors en mai 2023, un utilisateur de playguide.eu avait signalé que la grande aire d'avant avait été remplacée par une petite. Est-ce que elle aussi a été démontée ? Cf photos avant/après sur : https://playguide.eu/app/playground/a43ed89d-32bf-43a5-b6a4-6fca2f073941
Merci !
felipeeugenio (2024-01-13 13:03:54+00:00): Hola. 
1) Con la letra Q puedes cuadrar los edificios. Si dibujas varios puedes seleccionarlos y cuadrarlos todos juntos.
2) si modificas algo, por favor modifica lo que hay, no borres lo que hay para agregar lo tuyo. Se pierde todo el historial.
3) building es para el edificio, no para el recinto completo que contiene el edificio. es una distinción importante.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146158882
MxxCon (2024-01-15 18:38:13+00:00): Hello.
Is the operator if this location the same once the biz changed?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146158890
Robin Zyx (2024-01-15 19:46:03+00:00): I think the jewelry creator is someone who has used the Skill Mill location to make their products. Exterior signage outside says Skill Mill. There's nothing about jewelry that I've noticed. However, they've been closed most of the time when I've passed by lately, with a gate pulled down so that you can't see any signs in the windows.
MxxCon (2024-01-15 18:40:26+00:00): Hello.
The way you indicate 2nd floor is not by using addr:unit tag, but rather there's a dedicated addr:floor tag for this. You can read more about it at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:floor
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146159038
Robin Zyx (2024-01-16 01:00:45+00:00): I think I was doing it this way because I had seen something in the neighborhood already done this way.

It did make me raise an eyebrow the other day when I noticed some business had been labeled as being on "level=0", and I wondered if the editor was European.
MxxCon (2024-01-16 01:07:55+00:00): "level=0" is also a valid tag. That indicates the actual location of that feature. But addr:* is related the address info itself, not necessarily physical location.
felipeeugenio (2024-01-12 13:52:54+00:00): Hola, gracia spor la disposición.
El outer que le pusiste al area interior en verdad es inner.
y el area=yes sobra, pero la relación está ok. Yo lo arreglo
YomanNH (2024-01-12 09:09:53+00:00): Od czasu, gdy wiele osób zwracało Ci na to uwagę, nic się nie zmieniło. Ciągi pieszo-rowerowe nadal mapujemy jako jedną linię highway=path, a nie osobno chodnik i drogę dla rowerów. Trzymaj się standardów, a nie wymyślaj swoich.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w
MxxCon (2024-01-15 18:42:47+00:00): shop=beauty with cuisine=dessert;gourmet? Sounds delicious.😋
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146159369
Robin Zyx (2024-01-15 19:41:57+00:00): No idea how that happened. Since it says v4 on that address, it looks like I updated business info there. But I don't recall that formerly being a dessert cafe.
MxxCon (2024-01-15 19:59:45+00:00): It used to be Edible Arrangements location, you updated it, but neglected to delete cuisine= tag 🙂
Robin Zyx (2024-01-16 00:57:35+00:00): To be honest, I'm surprised I haven't made that error. Or maybe this is just the first one that was caught. There have been a few times I have been close to making it before e.g. noticing that the business had an "operator" in addition to the name.
dypa (2024-01-12 07:48:09+00:00): после 5 января разве установили знак приоритета?  откуда информация? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11509603835
Bobropiton (2024-01-12 09:01:38+00:00): приветствую. Согласно этому видео приоритетность там действует. https://vk.com/video-49073563_456239678
Marek-M (2024-01-12 07:08:56+00:00): Cześć, wysepka wymalowana na jezdni nie jest podstawą do rozdzielania drogi na dwie linie. Przy wysepkach na rondzie np. tutaj https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30896715 niepotrzebnie wydłużyłeś jezdnie do końca wymalowanych pasów. Rozdzielenie linii w OSM powinny kończyć się jak najbliżej końca wysepki fizycznie rozdzielającej jezdnie.
Marek-M (2024-01-12 07:15:07+00:00): Zmieniłem te drogi w CS: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146169004
Marek-M (2024-01-12 07:44:21+00:00): Na skrzyżowaniu Chrobrego/Koszalińska też dokonałem korekty, bo powstały tutaj jakieś dziwne połączenia na samym skrzyżowaniu a wysepka na Chrobrego jest znacznie krótsza niż rozdzielenie liniami. Jak zrobiłem zmiany pokazuje ten CS: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146169768
Marek-M (2024-01-12 07:49:46+00:00): Jeszcze jedna uwaga- Drogi prywatne nie powinny być oznaczane na terenie publicznym, bo uniemożliwiają np. rowerzystom zjazd z ciągów pieszo-rowerowych - tutaj poprawka dwóch zjazdów na teren prywatny: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146169942
miasteckieprojekty (2024-01-12 14:57:29+00:00): Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi na błędy. Pozdrawiam
Bienson (2024-01-12 05:40:43+00:00): Der Dönerladen nimmt nicht das gesamte Gebäude ein. Außerdem ist amenity=fast_food passender als amenity=restaurant.
MxxCon (2024-01-15 18:44:41+00:00): Hello.
When mapping sidewalks, please split them at each corner rather than a single way looping around the whole block. Just like you don't map roads a single loop around a block, sidewalks should be properly split up as well.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146159938
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-11 22:41:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11509636615
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11509662726

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-10 11:23:09+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1238965432/history has construction = construction that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What construction=construction means? What you wanted to express by using this tag?
eggie (2024-01-12 09:56:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-01-12 16:36:54+00:00): aqui com certeza não é uma via primária. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/253010792
mueschel (2024-01-16 14:58:31+00:00): Hi,
you added several "name:m" tags - could you check & fix the language code?
SomeoneElse (2024-01-28 13:27:56+00:00): Are you sure about farmyard for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131423194 ?  It looks a bit of a stretch, given the picture.
b-unicycling (2024-01-28 15:42:04+00:00): I think that tag was already there, when I added the pound tags. I didn't want to interfere with it.
watmildon (2024-02-11 04:51:33+00:00): Incredible work on the parking lot!!!
MxxCon (2024-01-15 18:50:04+00:00): Hello.
Please split your edits by geographic region. There's no reason for the same changeset to contain edits in US and in India. Please make and submit them separately.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146161498
CryptikFox (2024-03-14 23:59:12+00:00): Hi tcarisle,

This is the second time you have mapped a natural=sand multipolygon encircling a large portion of Factory Butte. The sand tag does not apply here. It is supposed to be used for areas of lose sand like beaches or dunes. Without getting into the geologic technicalities, everything here is bedrock. I have a bachelors of science in geology and have visited Factory Butte in person several times. There is no lose sand here which would warrant the natural=sand tag.

I have gone ahead and removed the incorrect sand multipolygon, please do not remap it.

Thanks!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-01-12 16:35:20+00:00): onde consta informação que aqui é GO-400? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/277655142/history
Dawid2849 (2024-01-12 15:20:15+00:00): Wikipedia shouldn't be used as a source on OSM. Also in this Wikipedia acticle you can read that this route doesn't exist. It's historically planned route.

This changeset should be reverted
Dawid2849 (2024-01-12 15:20:55+00:00): (English version of this Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_route_E404)
JeroenvanderGun (2024-01-12 20:30:34+00:00): The existence of the E404 is supported by three independent Belgian government sources, see note/source tags on relation 17015347. The route is indeed shorter than originally planned (extension A301 to Jabbeke was never built).

The route is indeed unsigned (hence ref:signed=no), but this is not unique among E-roads.
SomeoneElse (2024-01-12 12:29:41+00:00): Hello,
You've changed this from a "pinfold" to a "pound", but it's definitely referred to as a pinfold locally.
More generally, the word "pound" is very generic and has many different meanings.  It'd be better to stick to the original "historic=pinfold" for these features; if some (in southern England, perhaps) are referred to locally as pounds, and they really are different enough in function to tag differently, then maybe add "pinfold=pound" to those?
Best Regards,
Andy
b-unicycling (2024-01-12 12:34:08+00:00): I don't think we should start allowing for regional tags for features that have had a specific standard label on maps for over 150 years. I could agree to changing the value to animal_pound, but I'm yet to encounter a historic car pound.
b-unicycling (2024-01-12 12:35:29+00:00): Also, Historic England calls it a "pound": https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1149031, even thought they use both terms in their database.