piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bxl-forever (2023-08-15 14:03:27+00:00): Hello,
You located the POI inside housenumber 99 and added addr:housenumber 103.
103 is a burger restaurant which is still there.

Can you please provide more details about *where* you saw this pastry shop, so that we can update the map.
widowild (2023-08-15 14:46:08+00:00): Hello,
I saw that it was not listed, I went to this site: https://bevegan.be/fr/manger-vegane-a-bruxelles-notre-guide-des-bonnes-adresses/ and it is noted at number 103. It must be a mistake on this site.

On another site: https://www.veganwaf.be/contact it's listed as 105.

You can modify it and move it, when I created it I had almost no connection.

Best regards
vojtechzaboril (2024-11-28 18:53:54+00:00): Hi, could you please specify, why bicycles are forbidden on this part of Strakonická Street. I didn't found any signs that claims that.
Or this part which you also edited (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40759221)?

It's not a highway (in words of OSM - motorway), just a 4 laned road. So bicycles are allowed there (if there is no sign).
Regards
Frans S (2023-08-22 10:55:41+00:00): A new mapper !  Welcome. We hope you will enjoy mapping.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared. You just map rectangular buildings, despite there are also buildings with extensions.
 When buildings have L, U shape or protruding elements, they should be included into your mappings.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139915568
Frans S (2023-08-15 14:04:41+00:00): Hallo Martien. 
Dit is duidelijk geen track. 
een track geeft toegang tot akkers, water of bossen.
Dit is een verbinding tussen een dorp en een settlement en is een unclassified highway.
vriendelijke groeten.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139915988
martien-176 (2023-08-15 14:13:41+00:00): I mean the highway going north south (Way: 1195601510). To me that does not connect a settlement, leading only to a few afaics isolated barns.
Frans S (2023-08-15 14:26:29+00:00): Sorry Martien. I cannot locate that road.
martien-176 (2023-08-17 17:13:11+00:00): The highway i am referring to is:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1195601510
adiatmad (2023-08-21 03:47:37+00:00): Hello, would you be willing to review this object? Based on Bing satellite imagery, it appears to be situated in the midst of farmland. Thank you

(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1198312470)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139916699
docjay (2023-08-16 07:00:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Your contributions are looking good so far. Just a couple comments that I think I might have found helpful when I first started out:

When you deleted the building way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323198533), the address tags on it were deleted as well and the new buildings don’t have any address info. Generally, it is preferable to modify an existing building rather than delete and redraw so that tags aren't lost and people can look at the history of changes: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

In this particular case, I’m also not sure that this should be two different buildings. The street side facade across both is the same black paint and same window style, which makes me think these are the same building construction. Do you have some additional info otherwise? Either way is okay, it can always be sorted out later :-)
GSF1200S (2023-08-28 20:53:58+00:00): How come there is a "cliff" across the paths?
Baloo Uriza (2023-08-15 17:13:19+00:00): Could we get the imagery you're seeing?  Also don't forget to update or remove the source source:maxspeed tag
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139917500
bradylee (2023-08-15 18:05:59+00:00): I'm not sure how I can attach the file the customer sent to me. It's a very small .jpg

Is there a field where I can add an attachment? It wasn't collected from a source I can reference online.

Thank you
Tomas_J (2023-09-16 08:23:35+00:00): Cus, tu si vyrobil duplicitu - https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/ref%3Aminvskaddress=7001503377#overview
Jose Riha (2023-10-09 20:35:38+00:00): Ahoj, "zadarilo sa". Ale pozeram, ze uz to po mne opravil Klerik7 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/359817884/history)
csomerville (2023-08-17 18:57:07+00:00): Hi Cameron Ford. Thank you for helping to keep this area updated as it undergoes heavy construction.

1. Can you confirm the sources you are using for the updates you are making since the imagery is out of date? Have you been out to survey in person recently by chance? If not, I'm happy to do so if that will be helpful. 

2. I noticed you deleted the part of West William Cannon Drive north of 290 that is is being replaced. They should actually remain, with lifecycle tag updates as appropriate, until demolished (and probably until they don't show up on the default imagery for this area). See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

3. It appears that you are sometimes deleting and recreating ways. Please do avoid this as much as possible to preserve history (I've noticed this in a number of changesets over time so let me know if you need me to provide some specific examples). See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

4. Relatedly, it appears that some routes need to be fixed now. I'm happy to help review and fix them with you.

If I've misunderstood anything or got anything above incorrect, please let me know.

FYI I'm usually available on OSM US Slack if you'd like to connect there.

Kudos again.
tg4567 (2023-08-16 08:58:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139918657
tmgessner (2023-08-17 22:05:29+00:00): *Clarification: The section of road east of Sheridan Drive on Pulaski Avenue is the section fenced off.
kenken234 (2023-08-16 14:36:01+00:00): Hi, just saw ur query on wiki. As you can see with most of the map, the house number is added to the building as part of the building address instead of entrances as there are likely multiple entry points to a building.
You can crosscheck the house number with the Singapore OneMap overlay (which also puts the house number in buildings) but the one used for osm iD might not have been updated with the latest version on the official gov website so newer buildings might not show up
Hope this helps
Valerio_Bozzolan (2023-08-17 07:42:03+00:00): Yeah thanks! :) This area is confusing to me, maybe it was created after a legacy import.

Practical example. This building has the house number "44":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190945399

But literally over its main door I've seen "12a" so I added that information on a door.

Do you have any tip about this situation?
kenken234 (2023-08-18 13:24:24+00:00): You are right. If you go to 'Singapore OneMap' under background settings in the editor, seems like there's an error on that particular row of buildings 34~56 should be 2~24 instead. I've fixed the affected buildings
Valerio_Bozzolan (2023-08-18 15:53:28+00:00): Thanks \o/
Frans S (2023-08-22 11:49:38+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset and others back till 2 months are reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not in line with the requirements of these projects,


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139919592
Frans S (2023-08-22 11:51:03+00:00): You mapped mostly landuse objects. like grassland etc.  Please stick to the requirements of the projects. 
Buildings or buildings, roads and waterway. See the instructions.
Most of these unwanted mappings will be removed.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139919592
HBanu (2024-06-20 13:55:49+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139919883
eggie (2023-08-15 18:05:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
ivanbranco (2025-05-09 20:18:35+00:00): Sono tre cascate differenti? hanno tutte praticamente lo stesso nome
InsertUser (2023-08-15 18:40:17+00:00): I think your new way is going across the Florida Straits rather than along them.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-31 16:06:38+00:00): Hello!

You used
waste=trash;1
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11116969582/history

Have you maybe meant
waste=trash
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
literan (2023-08-15 17:36:56+00:00): не надо такие "достопримечательности" добавлять, пожалуйста.

кому наличники красивые, а кому и лавки красивые или деревья
Frans S (2023-08-22 14:50:50+00:00): A new mapper !  Welcome. We hope you will enjoy mapping.
Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key ( you did not square a single building)
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139922521
jimkats (2023-09-05 14:09:32+00:00): Είχες σβήσει το name:mk. Το επανέφερα.
Dodko (2023-08-17 08:22:42+00:00): Duplicitné adresy
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11116985766
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11117104732
treba opraviť aj ostatné zdvojené
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/ref:minvskaddress#values
kornad (2023-08-16 07:29:56+00:00): Please be careful with your tags - this is not a building. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139948592
qugeb (2026-01-24 12:10:54+00:00): Hallo,

welche Art von Geschäft ist das denn?
jtracey (2023-08-15 16:18:38+00:00): This reverts the following changesets:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139799151
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139892730
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139893300
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139893375
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139893440
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-09-05 01:23:18+00:00): this roads are not tertiary. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1198407509
user_14538650 (2024-02-16 13:46:20+00:00): Micromapping the Ethnology museum :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-13 12:52:37+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11117139443/history has shop = veterinary that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=veterinary ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it office of a veterinary doctor where you can come with animal for health services? Or is it a place selling veterinary supplies?
TheNet1996 (2023-08-18 05:31:15+00:00): Hallo,
hier hast du auch nur einen Teil der "Professor-Steinbacher-Straße" als Zufahrtsweg umgestellt. Warum?
Das Verbotsschild für KFZ steht schon am Abzweig von Prof.-Steinbacher-Straße.
Und warum wurde nur ein Teil der Straße umgetaggt?
Viele Grüße
Mike
TheNet1996 (2023-08-18 05:22:53+00:00): Hallo,
aus welchem Grund hast du denn dieses Stück als Zufahrtsweg geändert?
Das Schild Verbot für Kraftfahrzeuge steht schon vorne beim Biergarten Hexenhäusle.
Danke & Grüße
Mike
felipeeugenio (2023-08-15 17:30:57+00:00): Hola.
Entonces por favor cambiar el nombre en toda la calle. Que lo está haciendo en solo un segmento.
Adicionalmente cambiar las direcciones asociadas.
Que cuando lo hace solo en un sector da la impresión de que se trata de un error.
Gracias
Saludos
AlexSpritze (2026-03-18 11:35:45+00:00): Hi flierfy,

du hast den way https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=1198413978 eingetragen, aber der ist weder Teil einer Relation noch hat er Tags. Kannst du mal schauen, ob der weg kann? Anscheinend hat er keine Relevanz mehr.

Grüße
jimkats (2023-09-05 14:06:50+00:00): Στην "εκκαθάριση" των tags που έκανες, έσβησες το κύριο name. Το επανέφερα.
ivanbranco (2023-08-28 23:59:52+00:00): Hi tortugafugitiva,

what's the meaning of ramal=2 - 5 - 5 X SFE?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-15 17:20:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11109891949
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086438849

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
muralito (2023-08-16 01:59:54+00:00): Estimado, hace cinco años que venis borrando cosas que existen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56759655

En este cambio lo mismo, borras calles que existen, y hasta asfaltadas están, ¿que es lo que querés hacer?
rskedgell (2023-08-16 08:40:52+00:00): There wasn't a one way restriction in the first place, as two way traffic is the default on roads. Adding oneway=no is harmless, but it's generally redundant and has no effect. There are times when it's worth using, which are covered in the wiki article.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway
conrad_heimbold2 (2023-08-15 17:30:50+00:00): This changeset refers to note 3833818 ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3833818#map=19/49.80026/9.99504 ), where the problem was first described.
limes11 (2023-08-15 18:09:31+00:00): Sieht gut aus, habe es angesehen. Einen Knopf "reviewed" gibt es nicht. 

VG, Limes
conrad_heimbold2 (2023-08-16 14:17:48+00:00): Du kannst mit OSMCha die Änderung überprüfen und bestätigen: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139926533?filters={%22users%22:[{%22label%22:%22conrad_heimbold2%22,%22value%22:%22conrad_heimbold2%22}],%22date__gte%22:[{%22label%22:%22%22,%22value%22:%22%22}]}
conrad_heimbold2 (2023-08-16 14:18:35+00:00): Dafür einfach oben rechts auf den "Verify"-Button gehen und "Good" antippen/anklicken.
limes11 (2023-08-16 16:55:32+00:00): Ah danke, erledigt! (Vermutlich wirst du darüber aber nicht informiert, oder kommt da eine Mail?)
conrad_heimbold2 (2023-08-16 17:02:22+00:00): Ich wurde jetzt über deinen Kommentar informiert.
Sandal man (2023-08-15 18:33:42+00:00): Hello,
please make smalle changesets, this helps others in tracking changes. 

Thank you.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-15 17:40:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1198113584

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2023-08-16 10:08:09+00:00): Hello.  Global validators review also validated task, to check if they are validated in accordance with the HOTOSM quality standards.
On this task there are still issues, like un-squared buildings, connected nodes, incorrect tagged highways.
This task 1943 will be put back to ready to validate. Issues need to be solved.
Best regards
mga_geo (2023-08-21 17:56:11+00:00): Bonsoir,
Pourquoi avez-vous modifié le network ?
Le wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rennes/Transports_en_commun précise bien FR:STAR
Marc
mga_geo (2023-09-04 11:48:10+00:00): Bonjour,
Toujours pas de réponse ! Je vais remettre en place le tag.
Marc
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-15 18:00:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2603065875
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1097541138

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Shaun das Schaf (2023-08-16 19:53:15+00:00): Hallo Kai, willkommen bei OSM!

Zwei kleine Anmerkungen:
1. Bitte nutze einen aussagekräftigen Änderungssatzkommentar, sodass andere besser nachvollziehen können, was du geändert hast.
2. Du hast diesen Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80890180 in einen Pfad (highway=track) abgeändert. Da er aber zum einen als landwirtschaftlicher Weg ausgeschildert und zum anderen breit genug für mehrspurige Fahrzeuge ist, habe ich den Weg wieder in einen Feldweg (highway=track) geändert.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
chris66 (2023-09-16 08:10:54+00:00): Betrifft: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446485676

Spee-Campus

Gibts das Gebäude auf dem Gelände schon/noch ?

Grüße
habi (2023-08-16 10:03:43+00:00): Auch hier nur ein Detail; hast du abgeklärt, ob https://www.geogr.ch eine für OSM verfügbare Quelle ist?

Ansonsten gibt es unter http://qa.poole.ch/addresses/ch/ für OSM-Datenpflege verfügbare Adressdaten, die von https://sosm.ch/about/board/simon-poole/ gepflegt werden.
felipeeugenio (2023-08-15 21:20:17+00:00): Por favor no inventar hoteles que no existen. gracias
Joseph R P (2023-08-31 00:22:24+00:00): Hello, this road should not be a motorway as it is an undivided 2-lane highway, so I have reverted it back to trunk.
ChehrehBargi (2024-02-13 09:48:39+00:00): سلام
شما ساختمانهای داخل محوطه را از آن جدا کرده اید.
آیا این دو ساختمان از دانشگاه علمی کاربردی نیستند؟
نقش inner به معنی عدم ارتباط با رابطه اصلی میباشد.
این محوطه با نام مرکز آموزش علمی کاربردی خانه کارگر اردبیل در تابلو درب ورودی آن ثبت شده.
Frans S (2023-08-21 11:46:08+00:00): A new mapper !  Welcome. We hope you will enjoy mapping.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
B: Overlapping buildings.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapping them as 1 building.
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139931564
felipeeugenio (2023-08-15 20:48:20+00:00): 
Ahora llegué a la casa y reviso, pero se ve todo ok.
gracias
Sanniu (2023-08-23 05:24:31+00:00): Hi, the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1192078255 is not connected to surrounding road network and useless for automated routing. Can you, please, connect it, where appropriate?
MBTY1 (2023-08-23 12:49:22+00:00): Thank you very much, I fixed it thanks to you.
Is there anything else to add to the village?
hrhino (2023-08-15 19:55:31+00:00): also drop the suggestion to check Google Maps for this info ;)
silversurfer83 (2023-08-23 14:49:55+00:00): Danke.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139932124
eggie (2023-08-15 20:25:06+00:00): Na jaren nu een bijdrage in Nederland daarom Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Je heb het pad niet verwijderd. Je zou ook een 'waarschuwing' krijgen bij upload, want er loopt een wandelroute overheen. Kennelijk kun je de paden met iD dan niet verwijderen?
Je hebt wel foot=permissive verwijderd en horse=no   Dus dat routeert allemaal weer. Wat is je bedoeling.
Wanneer je niet meer op een pad mag komen aangegeven door een bord bv art 461 wvs dan wordt de tagging access=no in dit geval... tenminste als er nog sprake van een pad is. 
Wanneer alles is ondergeploegd en er geen pad meer is dan kan het uiteraard weg.
Hoe loopt de Kunstroute tegenwoordig?


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-08-15 20:30:33+00:00): Ook komt op het pad nog een ander pad uit halverwege. Hoe zit het daarmee?
eggie (2023-08-15 20:33:57+00:00): https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=8975512
eggie (2023-08-15 20:36:31+00:00): De voorgaande accesstagging heb ik even teruggezet. 
horse=no
foot=permissive
eggie (2023-08-16 07:16:40+00:00): Route omgelegd (lus is er uit) .Pad verwijderd.
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=8975512&map=15.0/52.2767/4.467
Groet
eggie
felipeeugenio (2023-08-15 21:17:41+00:00): Hola
Camilo, quien cambió le nombre a Cuncumen, usó el SII. y además dejó "Calle Once" como nombre antiguo (old_name=)
Usted donde confirmó el nombre?

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139932303
VLD522 (2023-08-28 14:02:43+00:00): Hola,
Revertí el cambio porque no logré confirmar el nombre nuevo que se había agregado. "Calle Once", por otro lado, veo que se usa incluso en las direcciones de algunos establecimientos ubicados en esa calle. Sin embargo, puede tratarse de un cambio reciente y por ello no es posible encontrar mucha información al respecto. Si cuentan con la certeza del nombre, me excuso por revertir el cambio; pueden volver a agregar el nombre nuevo. Muchas gracias.
felipeeugenio (2023-08-28 15:54:06+00:00): ok, gracias por el tiempo. Volví al nombre anterior. La calle efectivamente cambió de nombre. alle 11 queda como nombre alternativo (alt_name).

Respuesta del mapero que hizo originalmente el cambio está en otro changeset de este mismo camino (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138644006)

saludos
village (2023-08-15 20:05:36+00:00): removed unrelated wikipedia tag (linking to an at least not yet exixting WP article) from https://osm.org/way/112831736
added existing WP article to object concerned: https://osm.org/way/60991250

note: the street has been renamed recently (2023-06-20)
Charan Gotham (2023-08-25 08:41:54+00:00): This location is still not reflecting in facebook or insta or whatsapp
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-15 20:10:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11117564269

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
reportingsjr (2024-05-30 11:48:21+00:00): Hello,
I've been keeping these Mt Airy trails pretty well updating since I'm part of the trail crew there.

There were some recent changes and I noticed this changeset. You've modified the trails so they don't actually match what is on the ground pretty signficantly (I have very good GPS data I use to map these). Please be mindful in the future about the accuracy of your changes! I'm going to work to roll this change back so the map is accurate to the trails.

Thanks!
silversurfer83 (2023-08-23 14:48:25+00:00): Was already in the map. Removed your entry with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140280192
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139933202
Marek-M (2023-08-16 06:44:34+00:00): Czy to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11117610096 jest jakiś nagrobek psa z takim napisem? Jeżeli tak, to raczej powinien ten napis trafić do tagu inscription a nie do name. Poza tym do OSM nie wpisujemy nazw z wielkich liter.