piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jaap de vries (2025-02-07 14:16:28+00:00): Tomas,
Mocht je in de gelegenheid zijn om hier langs te gaan dan zie je dat het gras niet aan het gebouw zit maar los hier van. 
Op het forum wordt regelmatig aangegeven. Hier een citaat van Eggie "In principe verder niets aan gebouwen vastmaken behalve wegen die als building_passage of als covered aan de outline vastzitten." 
Mappen met behulp van de luchtfoto is leuk maar luchtfoto's zijn schuin ingevlogen en hebben altijd een afwijking. Ik heb ooit de GBKN van Arnhem moeten controleren, meer dan 80% was foutief. Alles moeten inmeten buiten  met de taychmeter van Leica.
Ik probeer te helpen maar its up to you...
Farah Mahmoudd (2025-02-06 21:29:57+00:00): It accepts paper, glass, and cans.
eggie (2025-02-06 21:40:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap Nederland. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
JJIglesias (2025-02-06 22:05:36+00:00): Gracias por agregar la Cascada al Mapa, conoces la altura aproximada de la caída de agua, para poderla agregar al mapa?

Slds
JJIglesias (2025-02-06 21:59:02+00:00): Gracias por agregar y corregir todos esos locales (POI) en Sucre, seria genial si pudieras recolectar su informacion de contacto como el telefono y el email.

Thanks for add/correct all those businesses (POI) ar Sucre. It will be great of you place among the data the Contact Information like phones and emails.

Best Regards
JJ
merylstreet (2025-02-07 20:01:26+00:00): Hola, si tengo tiempo lo haré, pero me estoy centrando principalmente en limpiar porque la mayoría de estos puntos de interés tienen 7 u 8 años. Muchas tiendas ya no están allí.
Dewidos (2025-02-06 22:16:21+00:00): Zmieniono w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162225100
SekeRob (2025-02-08 16:44:09+00:00): Hi,

Apologies. The longer viaduct in the motorway section, Fornaca west, was blown up in 2022 for a new one, seismic proof, video in my edit. Nobody bothered to adapt the road routing and accesses till now, so I did. By the looks it will be still a while, the Fornaca east now oneway=no . It's not an extremely busy motorway so the usual, taking their time. Forgot about FB routes.

Mea Maxima Culpa
cheers
SekeRob (2025-02-08 16:46:25+00:00): errata: The video is attached to this object https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311955083#map=18/42.316141/13.310682
JeroenHoek (2025-02-07 10:35:04+00:00): Doe dat dan ook voor de pedestrian area waar deze overheen loopt, en de twee voetpaden en de ingang van het museum.
the-wouter (2025-02-07 10:53:11+00:00): Done: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162240317
JeroenHoek (2025-02-07 11:16:08+00:00): Top!
OSMCowboy (2025-02-07 20:51:23+00:00): Correction: Source used was Mapillary
michael_ua (2025-02-07 08:09:16+00:00): Ознайомтесь, будь ласка, з правилами порядку слів у назв вулиць і виправіть всі свої зміни в Запоріжжі. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B8#%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%B2%D1%96%D0%B7%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%83_%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B8_%C2%AB%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%B2%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%96%C2%BB
joost schouppe (2025-02-07 09:15:51+00:00): Merci!
Jacopo (2025-02-07 09:31:25+00:00): Ciao
Grazie per la modifica, mi confermi che sono accettati BItCoin come forma di pagamento? Mi sembra strano
Grazie
Ing Giorgio Righetti (2025-02-07 10:15:14+00:00): Ciao Jacopo,
grazie a voi per il tempo dedicato a contribuire alla diffusione di bitcoin.
Ti confermo che vengono accettati perché sono uno dei tecnici (ing. Righetti Giorgio) dell'ufficio. 
Io personalmente accetto pagamenti in btc, gli altri colleghi invece non sanno nemmeno cosa sia bitcoin. 
Per cui almeno io li posso accettare come forma di pagamento e qualcuno dell'ufficio deve pur incominciare, no?
Se hai bisogno di altre informazioni fammi sapere, grazie ancora.
jcarlson (2025-02-06 22:46:54+00:00): ah shoot, source should say Plainfield Ordinances, not Oswego
eggie (2025-02-07 07:34:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback:

Bij name= gaat het om de naam va n het gebouw en die is volgens mij toch echt de Hervormde Kerk.
De Protestantse gemeente Uitwijk-Waardhuizen is de gemeente die hier kerkt.
Een adres hoeft niet op het gebouw. Er is een adresnode. 

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-02-07 07:38:43+00:00): De naam van het gebouw heb ik teruggezet. De kerkelijke gemeente heb ik als operator ingevoerd. 
De wikipagina verwijst ook naar de Hervormde Kerk. 

MVG
eggie
pgert (2025-02-07 08:47:50+00:00): In dat geval zou de naam mijns inziens gewijzigd moeten worden in 'Protestantse kerk'. De naam 'Hervormd' is voor onze gemeente (en dus voor de kerk) toch echt achterhaald. Schrijf ik als predikant van deze gemeente.
eggie (2025-02-07 09:03:05+00:00): 
Begrijpelijk....maar het gaat om de gebouwnaam.
Wanneer Hervormde Kerk niet meer gebruikt wordt kan deze als old_name= worden ingevoerd. 
Overigens zie je overal nog kerken die tegenwoordig onder PKN vallen die Hervormde Kerk heten en zelfs nog de naam van een 'heilige' gebruiken in alt_name=Onze Lieve Vrouwekerk bv. uit de tijd van voor de hervorming. 

Bevindelijke kerken hebben vaak helemaal geen naam en daar staat dan weer de naam van de Gemeente op. 
Maar up to you .. Ik heb het weer aangepast naar Protestantse gemeente Uitwijk-Waardhuizen.
Hervormde Kerk heb ik als alt_name ingevoerd. 
Bestaat die naam helemaal niet meer dan kunt u het ook aanpassen naar old_name=
Dan gaat de historie niet verloren in OSM.
ier nog wat leesvoer in de wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship
MVG
eggie
JamesChevalier (2025-03-18 16:56:34+00:00): Did you delete the boundary of Nekoma on accident?
NeisBot (2025-02-06 23:19:08+00:00): Hello Re4hockey, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1357641039

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=162226226
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-06 23:56:14+00:00): Vandalism reverted
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162226226
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-07 08:07:30+00:00): Thank you for your private message and confirming that it was by mistake.
M!dgard (2025-02-06 23:15:44+00:00): This selectively reverts changeset https://osm.org/changeset/162198468
extrablind (2025-02-06 23:25:32+00:00): I just don't know if this is proper definition for "Lieu-dit". Name is verified and correct.
goodidea (2025-02-21 05:19:23+00:00): Kleine Info: Bei der Buchhandlung Zeitlos (St. Arnual) hattest du vergessen, construction:shop=books zu entfernen/umzuwandeln. Ich hab's korrigiert ... Und noch Öffnungszeiten ergänzt. War gestern dort. Grüße!
Szymson (2025-02-16 19:37:23+00:00): +1
felipeeugenio (2025-02-07 12:17:52+00:00): Hola.
Lo que entiendo de la edicióne s que en verdad no hay semáforos, pero si hay signos pare y cruces peatonales de zebra. Por favor confirmar, porque hay tags que siguen indicando que hay semáforos. La edición no es 100% consistente, pero se puede arreglar.
Pero si necesito que me confirme.
Gracias.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162226705
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-02-07 14:48:51+00:00): Hi! Please do not realign buildings or roads, as they were aligned using official geodesic data. Aerial imagery available in the default id editor are rarely aligned correclty on the ground and varies between regions. Thanks!
Soshal Distan Singh (2025-02-11 08:22:23+00:00): >source=общедоступные карты

Это какие, например?

На всякий случай:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Авторские_права

P.S. Vespucci вам пока рановато использовать для рисования, т.к. даже в iD ошибок хватает...
mrpulley (2026-03-28 04:38:09+00:00): You accidentally changed the names to '100' as well. Fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180528630
eggie (2025-02-07 07:42:57+00:00): Hoi Voor de rendering de poi's iets meer uit elkaar gezet en één adresnode samengevoegd. 
Wellicht straks nog iets verder uit elkaar?
MVG
eggie
user_22460680 (2025-02-08 19:56:25+00:00): Hi Eggie, bedankt, hoe kan ik zien of de afstand voldoende is?
eggie (2025-02-08 20:22:59+00:00): Ctrl f5 een paar keer om de rendering te versnellen. Beetje in en uitzoomen.
Peter Towers (2025-05-23 21:24:16+00:00): Hello.
You have added an apron to an area of the airport where right now in May 2025 is a construction site where the new Concourse E is being built according to this source https://www.flydulles.com/Next. Can you tell me more about this apron you added here?
wardj1906 (2025-05-24 12:27:18+00:00): Hello,
Feel free to remove the apron to make room for the new construction.

James
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-02-07 15:01:38+00:00): These tags are not necessary and are implicit. As a rule of thumb, only add restriction or allowed access when the data is not the default value. Refer to the wiki for more information. Thanks!
nevw (2025-02-07 03:08:06+00:00): Hi, this appears to incorrectly numbered and/or incorrectly located on the street.
itmeanswhatsinthebox (2025-02-07 03:40:01+00:00): Sorry, fixed
LordGarySugar (2025-03-17 12:38:09+00:00): Hi, you added a duplicate Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre here, which I have just deleted.
gurglypipe (2025-02-07 08:29:49+00:00): This edit covers most of the length of the UK, and is therefore quite hard for other editors to review. Please make your edits smaller in future, thanks: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-07 13:59:32+00:00): Hi trupti345678, welcome to OSM.

May we know the source of your mapping activity? Thanks.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-07 23:57:46+00:00): missing connections
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162229058
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-07 23:55:50+00:00): missing connections
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162229195
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-07 23:55:23+00:00): missing connections
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162229370
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-02-07 15:14:15+00:00): SVP confirmer que le Boulevard de La Pinière n'existe plus à cet endroit?
Taya_S (2025-02-07 06:31:12+00:00): Hello Deuce1217,

I noticed that you retagged an old miles long railway=abandoned into a highway=track
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1318797455. You might want to check that one, as it doesn't seem like there is much of it left over.

Happy mapping,
Taya Snijder
Frank Peng (2026-01-20 06:17:12+00:00): Please don't delete existing roads and redraw them anew. Doing such things is against good practice on OSM. You deleted a few parking aisles and redrew them in this changeset. It would have been better to just modify the geometry of the existing roads you deleted instead of deleting them and redrawing them anew.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Please also don't remove map features you don't need or don't like. It's known that not everything is needed by everyone, but you should not work the other way around and remove map elements that someone else added just because you don't need it or you don't like it.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_objects_that_you_don't_need_or_like

You should go to the OSMCha link of this changeset at the bottom of this comment to see which roads you deleted and redrew in this changeset. (You may have to login to OSMCha with your OSM acount to see this changeset's edits on OSMCha.)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162229928
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-07 16:12:04+00:00): #seo #spam
jmarchon (2025-02-07 04:08:30+00:00): Something went wrong here - the changeset comment here was supposed to say "Canvec 024G01-02".
Pieter Vander Vennet (2025-02-07 11:00:26+00:00): I've also removed the corresponding image from Panoramax - I don't think an overview of you tooth should be on there ;)
5R-MFT (2025-02-07 11:35:44+00:00): Thanks, even lucky es not my. I couldn't delete them.
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-07 16:01:44+00:00): #seo #spam
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-07 16:02:04+00:00): reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/162235560
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-29 04:17:16+00:00): Removed SEO spam tags and corrected/split out name=* in changeset 183332639

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332639
PocketRocks (2025-02-07 23:11:45+00:00): Why do you make these classification changes? This is not how the classification structure work and many of these roads are still under construction
Joseph R P (2025-02-12 02:22:11+00:00): Hello, please use the 'ref=*' key for current official designations only. Future designations can be added under the 'fut_ref=*' key. For example: 'fut_ref=I 11' instead of 'ref=Future I 11'.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-03-23 20:45:38+00:00): Thank you, understood.
supsup (2026-02-21 20:29:03+00:00): Hello, I can see you added a lot of passes to Nepal’s map: https://ultrajourneys.org/mapping-nepal/

For example in this changeset, I think most or all of the 11 nodes marked as passes are not really passes. They mostly map to (minor) peaks or sidepeaks. This seems like an automated edit but I cannot find it in the logs: osm.wiki/Category:Automated_edits_log

Did you follow the automated log policy: osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

How did you determine they are passes?

I spent a month in the area and noticed the passes data there are just wrong, I think this particular changeset decreases quality of OSM - I have not reviewed all of Nepal but what I have seen, the data just felt wrong (either very minor passes marked where bigger passes were unmarked, or more often peaks marked as passes). Maybe I am missing something?

I also started a discussion here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/suspected-semi-automated-import-of-mountain-passes-in-nepal/141725
Peter Van Geit (2026-02-22 12:17:35+00:00): Passes were mapped based on the Nepal 1:25K and 1:50K topo sheets from pahar.in. Where ever a trail marked on the topo sheets hits the ridgeline (highest point) [whether on a saddle / peak / anywhere on ridge] is a mountain pass (refer wiki osm mountain_pass definition). Use of some of these trails (and passes) might be discontinued and therefore faded away just like any other trail or pass which was mapped in earlier years. If you verify on the ground that those passes no longer exist then they can be removed. I have explored and mapped hundreds of passes in the Indian Western himalayas through Survey of India maps in a similar manner
supsup (2026-02-22 12:39:50+00:00): Ok, first, what is the license of the source data?

Did you do this manually or programatically?

But I think I now understand where the problem lies. A lot of the trails follow a ridge (they are in parallel to it) and do not cross it (they are not perpendicular). The wiki definition does not specify it, but I would argue it implicitly assumes it (OSM being West-centric, ridge roads are not very common here at all).
supsup (2026-02-22 14:27:31+00:00): So, this node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12564723124#map=17/28.083707/84.881456
is based on this map: https://pahar.in/pahar/Maps--Primary/Nepal%20Maps/Nepal%20Topo%20Maps/2884%2016%20Arughat.jpg from the trail just under Mansire? where it sort of crosses a pass sideways? And for some reason, this is not made on a node of the unclassified highway that runs there?

Anyway, these maps are copyrighted at 1997. I do not thinkg they are out of copyright :-(.
supsup (2026-03-13 13:42:47+00:00): So I reverted this manual import with these changesets:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179149404
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179149569
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179149848

In case of objections, it would be best to discuss here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/suspected-semi-automated-import-of-mountain-passes-in-nepal/141725
NeisBot (2025-02-08 08:06:05+00:00): Hi ayomaju, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 37 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
user_21741990 (2025-02-07 08:09:08+00:00): A dokładniej to źródło stąd: https://www.skyscrapercity.com/posts/192013291/
andi9876 (2025-02-10 15:47:44+00:00): Hi. 
Hun Sen Boulevard no separated lanes.
Reverted.
LudovicG (2025-12-18 15:04:23+00:00): Vous avez ajouté la post_box B0H0E0 à la BOC8S2.
BOC8S2 existe encore ?
Est-ce une double post_box ?
Jerry_W2k (2025-02-07 08:29:38+00:00): Hej, to jeszcze nie jest zabudowa mieszkaniowa, działki nie są niezabudowane. Najlepiej tagować niezabudowane działki jako https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:landuse=greenfield?uselang=pl 
oraz 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:natural=grassland?uselang=pl
Jerry_W2k (2025-02-10 17:27:00+00:00): Proszę się odnieść do mojego komentarza lub poprawić zgodnie z Wiki. Ewentualnie w niedzielę przywrócę residential do greenfield/grassland tam gdzie nie ma budynków
grzegorz75jan (2025-02-11 16:28:51+00:00): Wycofanie bezsensownych zmian. Brak reakcji, odpowiedzi na komentarze innego edytującego te obiekty.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162398197
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-07 07:30:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12564793300

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2025-02-08 08:06:05+00:00): Hi 盖子哥, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 69 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Danil (2025-02-09 04:24:36+00:00): Pemetakan batas desa di OpenStreetMap menggunakan tag boundary=administrative bukan dengan landuse=residential (ini untuk area pemukimannya saja).

Untuk sementara saya hanya memperbaiki kesalahan geometri karena masih ada beberapa bagian yang meragukan seperti:

1. garis batas yang melintasi bangunan,

2. Karena akun ini mengatasnamakan pemerintahan desa sebaiknya mencantumkan sumber (perda, tugu, patok) yang bisa diverifikasi.

Konversi ke boundary nanti bisa saya bantu, atau kalau mau dikerjakan sendiri bisa merujuk ke https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:boundary

Salam kenal dari tetangga :-)
YomanNH (2025-02-07 07:53:14+00:00): Czy bicycle=designated i foot=yes na odcinku przecinającym obwodnicę (oznaczonym jako highway=construction) jest prawidłowe?
橘ヒカリ (2025-03-07 01:51:34+00:00): 您好，这个车站就叫“南信号”，没有“丰台”作为前缀。
Railway_hunter (2025-03-07 02:03:00+00:00): 虽然多用简称，但是此站在车务系统里是”丰台南信号“，用以区分京沪线在天津的“南信号”
橘ヒカリ (2025-03-09 14:23:39+00:00): 您好，OSM以工务LKJ基础数据为准。南仓的南信号不被认为是一个车站。
hackthemap (2025-03-20 01:16:41+00:00): Hi and thanks for contributing to OSM. This defibrillator was already in OSM. I think there is also a way to search for AEDs in OSM so you could see if it is already there before adding.
Could you remove the duplicate (newer, less tags) node again?
tjal (2025-03-20 06:01:09+00:00): I cannot see/find any other node, do you have a link?
hackthemap (2025-03-24 00:23:43+00:00): Yes, here is the old existing node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9555896239
You can also see it if you zoom all the way in (while editing) or if you temporarily move the node away in iD (osm.org web editor) while editing.

By the way, if the AED doesn't have a specific name, it should not have a name tag. This also applies for the other AED you created: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12564853200
Having emergency=defibrillator is enough in itself to clearly indicate it as an AED. It is up to each different data consumer (for example map views, but also programmatic users, data science/studies, etc.) if they want to show that as in icon (and not any text if there's no signed name) or with an "AED" text or a translated text of AED.
See here for other helpful tags to use for an AED (but which don't include name): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Ddefibrillator

Also, generic names should never be used, always use just the proper tags and the potentially signed name. This makes the OSM database most useful to all kinds of data consumers and not just for example for map views like the default osm.org map or Osmand. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
And for more information regarding the name tag, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Feel free to ask if anything is unclear or removing the duplicate node doesn't work.
hackthemap (2025-05-17 08:20:19+00:00): I removed the duplicate AED node of yours and removed the name=AED in the other node.
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-07 16:39:26+00:00): #seo #spam
s777n (2025-02-15 20:20:14+00:00): Перерисовал улицы
s777n (2025-02-15 20:20:19+00:00): Перерисовал улицы
YomanNH (2025-02-07 20:44:05+00:00): Te zmiany wymagają poprawy zgodnie z wytycznymi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w
grzegorz75jan (2025-02-08 01:22:44+00:00): Aktualnie nie ma sensu za bardzo w tej okolicy dłubać dokładniej pod kątem pieszo rowerowym ponieważ ruszają prace drogowe. Ma przybyć pasów jezdni a chodniki mają być inaczej poprowadzone w tym prawdopodobnie z jakąś kładką.
grzegorz75jan (2025-02-08 01:25:29+00:00): Wróć. Wspomniany remont, przebudowa drogi dotyczy ul. Lwowskiej czyli na kierunku północno wschodnim. Tam też jest wiadukt.
s777n (2025-02-15 20:20:22+00:00): Перерисовал улицы
grzegorz75jan (2025-02-07 15:24:34+00:00): To pewna informacja o tym budynku ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162235377
Adam_Piszczek (2025-02-07 22:40:51+00:00): Jak najbardziej
grzegorz75jan (2025-02-07 22:42:50+00:00): Dzięki.
s777n (2025-02-15 20:20:26+00:00): Перерисовал улицы
NeisBot (2025-02-08 08:06:05+00:00): Hi palmafu, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 123 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-10 15:20:02+00:00): Thank you for your private message.

#HappyMapping
andi9876 (2025-02-10 17:42:08+00:00): Hi.
Hun Sen Boulevard no separated lanes.
Reverted.