piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Langlaeufer (2023-02-26 19:17:52+00:00): hab das mal angepasst.
unclassified, weil eine öffentliche Straße, hgv=agricultural siehe Schild https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=323638449163901&focus=photo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133054172
katensen (2023-02-26 19:30:05+00:00): hgv=agricultural
traffic_sign=DE:253,1026-36
Langlaeufer (2023-02-26 19:39:28+00:00): Dann stimmt es ja jetzt Grüße Langläufer
katensen (2023-02-26 19:42:04+00:00): Ich danke Ihnen für Ihre Adleraugen. Ich danke Ihnen für Ihre Hilfe
katensen (2023-02-26 19:46:32+00:00): Zurzeit wird diese Straße als Umleitung genutzt, und ich habe festgestellt, dass sie auf der Karte nicht richtig eingezeichnet ist.
Langlaeufer (2023-02-26 19:53:34+00:00): 👍 weiterhin frohes mappen
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-24 16:53:35+00:00): Not bad, though Oklahoma doesn't have a major/minor concept for stop signs.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133054322
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-26 18:30:39+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10695345357

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
DomenicoCacace (2023-02-27 10:44:09+00:00): Buongiorno,
Dalle immagini aeree la strada che hai eliminato sembra esistere. Se la strada non è accessibile al pubblico piuttosto che eliminarla sarebbe più corretto aggiungere ulteriori dettagli relativi all'accesso, ad esempio con il tag access=private. 
Le motivazioni per non cancellare le strade private sono molteplici, c'è una piccola pagina a riguardo sulla wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
Ludovico Mosca (2023-02-27 11:18:43+00:00): Buongiorno, grazie per il contributo. Nel dubbio avevo infatti spuntato l'opzione che prevedeva la verifica prima di rendere definitiva la cancellazione. Proverò a capire come ripristinare la strada privata cancellata. Saluti
confusedbuffalo (2023-02-28 18:59:07+00:00): Looks good to me, thanks for adding it. The only thing is that you don't need to specify the access unless it's restricted in some way, so I've removed that tag. In terms of direction, it's relative to the direction of the line, you should be able to see the arrows on the line you have drawn.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Urbis96 (2023-03-02 11:24:27+00:00): Dobrý den,

mohl byste prosím uvést odkaz ke zmíněné studii providitelnosti Správy železnic?

Děkuji
Séba_PRG (2023-03-02 20:47:22+00:00): Hezký den,
studie je k nalezení zde:
https://www.spravazeleznic.cz/vrt/praha-brno-ostrava-a-brno-breclav/studie-proveditelnosti
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
wkdgs (2023-02-28 14:06:17+00:00): Ist der gesamte Park da, der Gemeinschaftsgarten? Dann wie folgt:

Den Gemeinschaftsgarten-Punkt selektieren. Links, den Reiter Eigenschaften öffnen und auf den Text-Modus (Button rechts daneben) umstellen und den gesamten Inhalt kopieren.

Dann die Parkfläche selektieren, wieder den Reiter Eigenschaften öffnen und auf Text-Modus umstellen. Alles aus dem Feld löschen und den kopierten Text einfügen.

Jetzt sollte statt dem Park der Gemeinschaftsgarten als Fläche auftauchen und der alte Gemeinschaftsgarten-Punkt kann gelöscht werden.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133054859
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
angys (2023-02-26 18:38:18+00:00): × Tanjung Berembang update
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
adrianojbr (2023-02-27 21:35:38+00:00): Olá, LThiesen!

Evite alinhar elementos exclusivamente com base em imagens de satélite. Há distorções devido as fotos serem em 2D representando um mundo 3D.

Mais informações em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Align_aerial_imagery_before_tracing.

Abraço!
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:47:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
aTarom (2023-02-26 19:56:37+00:00): Hola Arturo,
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1037706579/history
el tag
"below_default"="1.5"
se trata de un error? es muy bajo para pasar como highway
Desde la imagen aérea parece más un embornal que un
"highway"="unclassified"
Saludos
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2023-02-28 11:46:18+00:00): Hola.
Existen dos túneles de estas caractéristicas bajo la SG-20, aparentemente son tuneles normales pero la tierra esta más allta que en el resto de túneles, tal vez se podrían etiquetar como senderos.
aTarom (2023-02-28 11:59:20+00:00): Con altura de 1.5m, no me parece como ningún tipo de highway, pero sin conocerlo ni tener imágenes de la zona no puedo opinar con criterio, hazle unas fotos y pregunta por los canales de la comunidad
https://t.me/OSMes
ó
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Glassman (2023-02-28 17:35:44+00:00): Did you mean the housenumber is 1310 and not a unit number?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133055700
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Glassman (2023-02-28 17:37:10+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133056087
Glassman (2023-02-28 17:37:16+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133056112
Glassman (2023-02-28 17:37:41+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133056471
Glassman (2023-02-28 17:37:57+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133056506
Glassman (2023-02-28 17:38:09+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133056524
Glassman (2023-02-28 21:43:17+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133056562
Glassman (2023-02-28 21:44:51+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133056562
bxl-forever (2023-02-26 20:40:35+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for spotting the recent changes in the traffic situation.

I might have a few questions because there seem to be a few inconsistencies on the map now.

You made Kerklaan a one-way street without any exemption for cyclists or class-A mopeds.  This is very rare, normally there should be one of those white M2 or M3 signs, right?  A few days ago we fixed the part under the railway, which is open to cyclists, so it would be very unlikely cycling towards Woluwelaan would be forbidden.

Also, what shall we do with this road?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28798159
Vehicles can no longer reach this connector.  Has the road been blocked?  Anything special here?

Thanks.
Dylan Van Assche (2023-02-27 06:19:00+00:00): Hello,

I made some changes and I think I now allowed bicycles and pedestrians to use Kerklaan in both directions. I also removed the road you mentioned as the road is completely blocked and chances are that it will be removed. That part is still under construction.
bxl-forever (2023-02-27 10:10:57+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for writing back.

I did a few changes after your correction.  Here are some explanation, they might be useful.

1) Since many mappers use aerial imagery, as long as the old road is still visible, I recommend leaving it on the database, just removing its tags.  That will avoid that another mapper wants to "add a missing road" here.  I undeleted the road and tagged it as disused:highway=*

2) In Belgium, cyclists are vehicle drivers, so oneway:bicycle=no is important, and thanks for adding it.  Pedestrians are not concerned by this, and one-way restrictions never apply to pedestrians.  I removed your "oneway:foot=no" tag, this is not necessary.
Dylan Van Assche (2023-02-27 10:15:01+00:00): Hi,

Thanks! I learned something again :) 
I will keep this in mind for future edits!
Jan Olieslagers (2023-02-28 13:16:18+00:00): I consider this changeset incorrect, since the runway is clearly disused, and has been tagged accordingly. Why has the extra tag been repeatedly re-added?
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
b12f (2023-02-26 19:41:01+00:00): Hallo @hutstaender!
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
eggie (2023-02-26 20:44:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-02-26 20:47:35+00:00): Dag DirkJan... De combinatie access=no (Bij bord Verboden Toegang) met foot=yes (overigens niet nodig op een wandelpad) proberen we te ontmoedigen.  De rendering valt ook weg. 
Bij een wamdelpad (footway) staat er vooraan een G7 bord. Is dar hier het geval?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-26 20:52:37+00:00): ... access=no (Verboden toegang) en foot=yes (default) heb ik verwijderd.
Het zal niet voor iets met wielen routeren.
MVG
eggie
DirkjanKok (2023-03-25 21:02:51+00:00): Aan het begin van het pad, maat ook halverwege bij de kruising van de parkwijklaan staat bord G7.
eggie (2023-03-25 21:10:29+00:00): Oke Dirkjan...
.. foot=yes is default. Dat hoeft niet toegevoegd te worden...
access=no betekent Verboden Toegang. Dat zal hier niet.
Alles met wielen staat ook per default op =no.. Het zal dus niet routeren voor fietsers.
Je hoeft op een wandelpad bv geen bicycle=no te taggen Het zit daarin al ingebakken.

Bedankt voor je reactie...
eggie
eggie (2023-03-25 21:14:49+00:00): .... maar laat je niet weerhouden door wat kritiek om te gaan mappen. 😀
In het begin worden bijdragen gevalideerd en proberen we nieuwe mappers te helpen.
eggie
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Glassman (2023-02-28 21:46:02+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133057434
Minh Nguyen (2023-08-29 18:41:02+00:00): Did you mean to tag this entire building as a McDonald’s flag?
skquinn (2023-08-29 21:50:16+00:00): No, I'm not sure how that happened.
skquinn (2023-08-30 02:41:21+00:00): Fixed, see changeset 140556052
Glassman (2023-02-28 21:47:19+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133057561
algot (2023-03-23 13:55:49+00:00): Звідки ви взяли назву Міжгрупа для магазину Інтертоп?
algot (2023-03-23 13:57:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/95974364
avinet_ua (2023-03-23 18:14:15+00:00): помилка
algot (2023-03-23 18:19:49+00:00): А навіщо ви робите такі великі чейнджсети?
Навмисно, щоб не можна було зробити реверт?
avinet_ua (2023-03-23 18:32:07+00:00): а навіщо робити реверт?
algot (2023-03-23 18:33:47+00:00): Щоб ваші помилкові зміни відкотити
avinet_ua (2023-03-23 18:33:57+00:00): через одну точку хочеться зробити реверт великого об"єму роботи? подивися історію точок і зрозумій чому так і було зроблено і що саме. і не задавай дурних питань
algot (2023-03-23 18:47:43+00:00): По-перше, тон вибирай, коли пишеш
А по друге, що я повинен там побачити?
avinet_ua (2023-03-23 18:55:48+00:00): через одну помилку відкотити кілька сотень робіт?
avinet_ua (2023-03-23 18:57:23+00:00): я вибираю такий тон, який потрібний до людини, яка хоче повернути російські назви вулицям в Україні, оскільки це скоріше за все росіянин, який вдає з себе українця

побачити в історії що там були російські назви
darkonus (2023-03-23 19:04:26+00:00): avinet_ua, якби перед такими масовими змінами ви прочитали й дотрималися https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct може й негативу було б менше
algot (2023-03-23 19:06:02+00:00): Я маю питання по 1 об'єкту
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/95974364

І я не розумію, чому він так переіменований. І бачу, що він був так неправильно переіменований декілька разів
avinet_ua (2023-03-23 19:11:37+00:00): то треба один цей об"єкт виправити, а не хотіти робити відкат усього ченжсету
SomeoneElse (2023-05-29 12:36:37+00:00): Hello avinet_ua,

As you'll be aware the DWG has been reverting some of your mechanical edits to OSM after numerous complaints.

We also got a complaint about https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3102875794/history .  As you can see from https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/3102875794 you deleted the previous (Russian) name and added a Ukrainian one.
Given the history of Crimea I'd expect that node 3102875794 would actually have names in Crimean Tatar (possibly several orthographies), Russian, and (since 1954) Ukrainian.  If a place has a name in a certain language please do add it as "name:language=whatever".  The "name" tag itself should be decided by the people living in the local area.  See https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf for more details.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group