piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
skyper (2023-05-16 13:33:32+00:00): Hi,
sorry, I do not know exactly how `highway=path` and `highway=track` are handled in the US but I think your view is too car-centric. Yes, the tiger import was of low quality, though, in Europe I would only change the highway's value and add a `FIXME=recheck existence` instead of deleting and I was really surprised that "Modified geometry" includes the deletions of several ways. How about asking the community e.g. at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/us/78?
Regards,
skyper
deepikja (2023-05-18 18:04:56+00:00): Hi Skyper,
We apologize for the incomplete change set comment provided by the editor in this particular change set. We have provided the editor with feedback and coached them to follow the change set commenting etiquettes.
According to OSM wiki the tag highway=track is used for minor land-access roads mostly used for agriculture, forestry etc., https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=track. 
The tagging highway=path indicates a generic path that is used by pedestrians, small vehicles like bicycles, and/or animals. 
The editor deleted the segment based on the latest imagery the path is largely vegetated and do not serve a physical entity. However, going forward we will be mindful while making such modifications and refrain from deleting existing segments unless we have ground evidence such as latest aerial imagery and overlays supporting the edit.
Regards,
Deepikja
Frans S (2023-08-08 14:45:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping .It is some time ago, but I want you to inform you about 1 issue
Do not add a layer tag to a building to hide an upcoming error because it crosses another building.
Just correct the building.
Best regards and keep mapping
mcliquid (2023-04-27 13:28:20+00:00): Dankeschön!
bigopenmac (2023-04-27 13:13:43+00:00): boundary=administrative у Красносельского района удалил намерное или по ошибке?
literan (2023-04-27 17:35:46+00:00): вернул
MaximusAD (2023-04-27 18:13:19+00:00): Удалил по ошибке
Frans S (2023-05-15 13:03:37+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Mapping multiple buildings as 1 building.
Tall (multistory buildings) mapped wrongly,
See attached video
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view

Best regards



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135425962
b-unicycling (2023-05-01 16:07:23+00:00): not sure if that's what it is. I remember this, it definitely has a surveyors mark in it; there is a little flap on top, and when you open it, you see the surveyor's thing. Maybe it was built for that rather than as a milk churn stand. It doesn't seem to have enough steps to be a milk churn stand anyway.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-09 10:22:31+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and applied correct tagging for World of Smoke & Vape POI in changeset 183867526

https://osm.org/changeset/183867526
skyper (2023-04-27 13:27:36+00:00): Hi,
still the same problems as in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135166090.
What kind of QA are you using prior to upload and for your review system?
Please, stop adding new objects. Instead, fix all your previous edits and discuss your future strategy.
Regards,
skyper
gurglypipe (2023-05-19 21:53:41+00:00): Are you sure there’s nothing to give way to? There’s all the traffic on the A580, and I don’t think it’s going to be stopping for someone on a bike!

There might not be give way signs, but are there dashed lines painted where the cycleway meets the road? That indicates a give way too.
jonrellim (2023-04-27 14:00:12+00:00): Hoi brasisi,

In Nederland zetten we adresgegevens nooit op het gebouwomtrek, deze worden namelijk met BAG-import acties automatisch aangemaakt als aparte nodes bovenop het gebouw. 
Ook zijn de gebouwen zelf dusdanig uitgemeten dat ze na een BAG import vrijwel altijd correct op de kaart staan. Dingen zoals overkappingen of een carport horen officieel niet bij het 'gebouw' en worden dus niet geïmporteerd. Mocht de geometrie van een gebouw niet kloppen, kun je het beste een terugmelding doen bij de BAG zelf. Extra aanbouw kun je eventueel op OSM toevoegen door het er aan vast te plakken. Maar pas nooit het oorspronkelijke gebouw aan. Ik heb het gebouw even opnieuw geimporteerd vanuit de BAG.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135430305

https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=vijfhuizen&objectId=0855100000817642&theme=BRT%20Achtergrond&geometry.x=134808.9785&geometry.y=402047.3815&zoomlevel=15&bijbehorendeAdressen=Pand
eggie (2023-04-27 14:45:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. De overkapping zal ik apart met building=roof layer = 1 intekenen. 
Aan de zuidzijde zie ik ook iets dergelijks in de BGT?
Laat even weten ... dan kunnen we helpen. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Stephchore (2023-04-27 12:32:25+00:00): Modification confirmée
user_5359 (2023-04-28 04:14:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys).
SomeoneElse (2023-04-27 13:01:48+00:00): Hello M-NCPPC_Import,
As suggested over at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tagless-points-and-lines-in-greenbelt-md/97992/31 you need to stop now.
To summarise:
* you're still importing new data without a licence waiver in place.
* you still haven't discussed this import with the community properly  so that people can check what you are going to do
* you are still importing obviously incorrect data like a "30 foot high shed" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1166123026 .
If you don't stop this import voluntarily we will block the account and revert what you have imported so far.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
user_5359 (2023-04-28 04:12:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-09 10:33:33+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and applied correct tagging for World of Smoke & Vape POI in changeset 183868014

https://osm.org/changeset/183868014
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-27 13:11:05+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10846242807
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4894923123

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1957432516

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Damrota":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9977059562
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9977059563
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9977059565
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9977059566
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9977059567
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9977059568
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9977059569
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9977059570
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9982868901

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Jrachi (2023-05-13 14:22:42+00:00): Attenzione!
distance è in km se non specificato.
19.000 sono 19mila km
flohoff (2024-01-28 16:15:44+00:00): Moin,
ich bin über diese Baustelle gestolpert - Gibts da eine Ansage bis wann die gehen soll?
Ironforester (2024-01-28 16:21:09+00:00): Ich meine, in einem Zeitungsartikel stand mal was von Mai 2024. Ohne Gewähr. Die neuen Fahrbahnen sind teilweise schon im Unterbau fertig.
Pmz (2025-07-28 06:47:19+00:00): Bonjour, Pourquoi avez vous supprimé les surfaces réservées au projet LUSO ? Encore le mois dernier, des terrains ont été préemptés par la métropole pour compléter la maîtrise foncière sur cet emplacement. Pouvez vous restaurer s'il vous plaît les polygones 486040309 et 486329799 ?
Pouvez-vous donc rétablir ce polygone, s'il vous plaît ?
benoitdd (2025-07-28 09:17:20+00:00): bonjour, pour 486040309, aucune idée 2 ans après de pourquoi j'avais supprimé le greenfield, sans doute pour corriger par rapport à l'imagerie aérienne, mais il n'y a avait pas d'indication sur le polygone d'un usage programmé.
et pour 486329799 ce n'est pas moi qui ai supprimé ce polygone ;) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/486329799/history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135428669
aTarom (2023-04-27 15:36:37+00:00): Hola andrei_ptk,
recupero el name
"Calle de Langreo"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193851734/history
eliminado en este changeset, v4 de la vía
por si hay algún problema en su flujo de trabajo,
Saludos cordiales
andrei_ptk (2023-04-28 08:41:52+00:00): Dear aTarom. 
Thank you for your comment. I am really sorry about my mistake. I must be more carefully and attentive. Thank you for your corrections. 
Best regards

Estimado aTarom. 
Gracias por tu comentario. Lamento mucho mi error. Debo ser más cuidadoso y atento. Gracias por tus correcciones.
Saludos cordiales
KarinaLis (2023-05-16 06:05:45+00:00): According to the edit feedback the road name was changed #mapbox_contribute
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135429257
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-27 13:50:18+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8338241623
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8338243185
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8338246543
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897065185
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897065442
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897065879

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
74523978 (2023-05-13 20:37:32+00:00): Sorry ik vind dit geen goede kwaliteit edit. Helaas zal ik alles na moeten kijken en waar nodig corrigeren.  Lever a.u.b. betere kwaliteit of laat het gewoon achterwege.
CartoKees (2023-05-14 12:21:27+00:00): U stelt vrij absoluut dat de edits niet goed zijn. Maar u komt niet met een inhoudelijk voorbeeld van een verkeerde edit.
74523978 (2023-05-15 07:50:38+00:00): Ik heb alleen naar het eindresultaat gekeken, niet de changeset onderzocht. Bij nader inzien zijn er wel veel fragmenten samengevoegd. Omdat er nog steeds fragmentatie is (vanwege incomplete tagging wegdelen)en ik ook andere fouten zag (aangebracht door anderen) heb ik, mede vanwege de mutatie geschiedenis, te snel geoordeeld, daarvoor mijn excuus.
CartoKees (2023-05-15 17:13:41+00:00): excuses geaccepteerd
danieldegroot2 (2023-04-27 13:52:10+00:00): See also Já 360° götusýn:
https://ja.is/kort/?x=444904&y=368193&nz=14.96&ja360=1&jh=190.0
( via https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Iceland#Free_data_sources )
b-unicycling (2023-04-27 14:37:23+00:00): Fair play! How do you do it? I've travelled along mapillary imagery, and I have yet to find one that isn't near me, i.e. my own mapillary imagery.
danieldegroot2 (2023-04-27 20:54:28+00:00): Just try searching for a bit. Anyhow, could you please keep changeset comments related to the changeset? The rest can be discussed in DM.
Something B (2023-04-27 14:36:51+00:00): Hi, Mafedisz! 
This shelter and hostel are real?
Regards,
Something B.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135430184
Something B (2023-04-27 14:31:53+00:00): Hi, Indydac!
Please write phone numbers in international format (with +).
Regards,
Something B.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135430371
gscholz (2023-04-28 06:19:57+00:00): Hi Paolo,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=9.18937&lat=44.80833&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=135430965

This kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about how to edit hiking routes properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking

Kind regards
Guido
zorglubu (2023-04-28 14:39:15+00:00): Bonjour,

Comme indiqué dans la page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:natural=tree, l'attribut name ne devrait pas être utilisé pour décrire l'espèce d'un arbre.
Si le nom latin est inconnu, l'attribut species:fr=* est le plus adapté pour une exploitation possible de l'information.
voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:species

Merci aussi de penser à préciser dans les commentaires des modifications la description de la modification faite, et non pas comme ici "landuse" :-) merci.
Đuro Jiří (2023-04-27 17:28:14+00:00): Jesi li siguran da je ovo jednosmjerna ulica?
rinski999 (2023-04-27 18:37:20+00:00): nije. ne znam sto sam napravila.
Đuro Jiří (2023-04-27 18:47:25+00:00): Ok, popravio sam to
user_5359 (2023-04-28 09:52:16+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1166154816. What is the mean of the tag false=A
Carto'Cité (2023-04-28 10:25:53+00:00): Oops ! Did it again :-(   Just fixed it : thanks for the notice.
user_5359 (2023-04-28 04:07:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys)
eggie (2023-04-27 17:06:28+00:00): Dag Bert   Je vraagt feedback

name=...  ontbreekt nog.
Hoe heet het restaurant? 
Probeer ook bij te taggen op de adresnode.
Doe je dat zelf?

MVG
eggie
(Engel)bert Bos (2023-04-27 17:17:16+00:00): De naam is: De tuinen van hier.
Ik vind nergens waar ik die naam kan invullen. Wil jij het a.u.b. voor mij regelen?
eggie (2023-04-27 17:32:53+00:00): Done...  Wanneer je kiest Alle tags zichtbaar .. dan kun je zelf regels bijvoegen
name=....
opening_hours=Th-Su 11:00-18:00
website=https://detuinenvanhier.nl/

enz. 
Het staat er nu op.
Groet
eggie
(Engel)bert Bos (2023-04-27 17:55:45+00:00): Hartstikke Bedankt Eggie. Ik heb het inmiddels gevonden en zal proberen het de volgende keer zelf te "fiksen" maar het is en blijft moeilijk voor mij.
rab (2023-04-27 17:38:07+00:00): please check for the most recent imagery layer before start mapping.
https://up.picr.de/45564464yn.jpg
As you can see some ways are not there anymore.
There are new buildings instead.

for short private roads like this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1166157205
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1166157206

best practice: do not map them
second best practice: do not map them
third best practice: "highway=service" + "service=driveway"
Max-Kritic (2023-04-27 15:30:59+00:00): Pas de sens unique, pas de DSC, mais une bande cyclable de 50 cm le long des portières

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.27756313189&lng=2.7890139771654&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=757911498252967
anne_geovelo (2023-04-28 07:19:15+00:00): Merci, c'est ajouté!
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-04-27 15:05:49+00:00): Tagging Wege und Straßen in Neuenkirchen angepasst.

source=survey
Kai Johnson (2023-09-07 22:43:13+00:00): Both USFS GIS data and the USFS Visitor Map show the continuation of FS 54 through this property as being publicly accessible. Were you able to verify from information on the ground that the gate is locked or signed to restrict public access?
marc__marc (2023-05-07 15:30:52+00:00): Bonjour,
n'hjésitez pas à mettre un source sur le changeset :)
il manque un type de relation, type=level je suppose
Cordiialement,
Marc
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-27 15:20:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1166164535
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1166164537
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1166164538

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
gpserror (2024-05-17 17:51:41+00:00): Do you remember if you split up the connection between east main street and west main street that was separated at that railway crossing?  Was this done by accident or was there a reason for it?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4250670
AndersAndersson (2023-04-27 18:51:20+00:00): Hello
You accidentally added a bus relation to a residential area in Sweden.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15775196/history
AndersAndersson (2023-04-28 22:33:00+00:00): I removed the bus relation from the residential area in changeset 15775196.
felipeeugenio (2023-04-27 18:26:46+00:00): Hola. Ese camino L-415 que agregó; no tiene rol de acuerdo al MOP
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135433154
GOwin (2023-06-25 22:46:36+00:00): Hello @Izzhar Balbon. 

I'm curious about some of the elements you added in this changeset that doesn't show up in several imagery providers.

Can you please elaborate what your source is?
emersonveenstra (2023-04-28 11:12:07+00:00): Hi,

Looks like you messed up the Stone Ridge boundary here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1166131376

Would you mind fixing that? Thanks!
Stretch Longfellow (2023-04-28 15:05:04+00:00): Good catch; it is fixed!
user_5359 (2023-06-19 08:48:01+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1166179885/history. What is the mean of the tag CATEGORIA = PERMANENTE?
MauCal (2023-06-19 18:07:25+00:00): I'm sorry, a typing error
Pontius (2023-04-27 22:32:04+00:00): Are both bodies of water really called Sears Lake?
Sangueffusor (2023-04-28 11:06:05+00:00): I am not sure (I didn't even notice a name on the smaller one) - USGS data seems to indicate that the smaller one is called Sears Lake. I did a cursory search of McLean county's website and couldn't find anything referencing the larger body of water
Sangueffusor (2023-04-28 13:45:08+00:00): I removed the name from the larger reservoir and moved the dam node. 135470564
GOwin (2023-04-28 01:53:59+00:00): Good job! Thank you.

If you're keen to know about fellow OpenStreetMap contributors, or ask questions, check out what's available on your platform : https://osm.org/wiki/PH
VLD190 (2023-05-01 17:37:58+00:00): Hello Landfahrer,

It has come to my attention that relation 13999702 is currently an open loop relation. I see that this is a very large scale relation and want to get some context on if you will be continuing to close the open loops to this relation. Also, if there is any information on the best way to edit this feature that would greatly help.
landfahrer (2023-05-03 08:11:41+00:00): Hello VLD190
In addition to relation 13999702, relation 253825 is also affected. I don't have the knowledge about the local conditions to continue to work on them properly.
VLD190 (2023-05-03 19:08:03+00:00): Hello Landfahrer, 
Thank you for your feedback. I will go ahead and assist you with this relation. Let me know if you may have any questions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135434996
rarad74 (2023-04-28 06:44:44+00:00): Salut. Nu trebuia sa modifici lungimile podurilor. Eu le masurasem deja inainte deoarece trec zilnic pe acolo. Unul din poduri  este mai lung decat celalalt deoarece trece si tramvaiul pe sub el. Niciunul nu porneste si nu se termina din acelasi punct. O sa dau revert si o sa le schimb eu din statusul de constructie.
Tiberiu Popescu (2023-04-28 06:57:21+00:00): Salut! Multumesc pentru informare.
cyton (2023-04-27 19:37:21+00:00): what'd i do wrong? did i miss to merge a driveway, and made a duplicate?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135435348
ratrun (2023-04-28 12:18:43+00:00): Yes, you created two overlapping ways: one tagged as highway=service service=driveway, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1058401874/history 

I kept the additional way which containes the additional width tag: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1165046320/history

Not a big deal!
ratrun (2023-04-28 12:20:41+00:00): I just checked: as you are using JOSM it should have given a warning before the upload, do you remember it popping up?
cyton (2023-04-28 12:54:47+00:00): Yes i remember the warning.
My workflow is kind of awkward, though.
I merged all others, and must have missed this one.
I should orobably write a diary entry about how i did this with josm -> vespucci -> josm
Carnildo (2023-04-27 18:24:29+00:00): Reverted as vandalism.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-29 13:33:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135504010 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7093
Bienson (2023-04-27 20:35:14+00:00): Poller müssen als Node auf dem Weg eingetragen werden, sonst können sie nicht ausgewertet werden für Routenplaner etc.
Bienson (2023-04-27 20:37:36+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard
ygcgjp5 (2023-08-30 07:16:38+00:00): viena diena po mano pataisymo ir žymos uždėjimo, jog nėra ortofoto, perkeli kioską atgal ten kur jo jau nebėra???
ygcgjp5 (2023-08-30 07:23:15+00:00): pasitaisysiu, ne viena diena, o trys mėnesiai.
Snaiperis (2023-08-30 08:01:27+00:00): Numečiau žymą, nes: 1) kioskas yra vietovėje; 2) jis yra (buvo) Maxar Premium Imagery. Maxar Premium iki 2023 liepos buvo prieinamas OSM braižytojams. Norėčiau komentaro dėl žymos prasmės. Jei tikslas patikrinti ar yra vietovėje - taip patikrinta, kioskas yra. O kokia prasmė rašyti, kad kažkuriame ortofoto jo nėra?
ygcgjp5 (2023-08-30 09:55:24+00:00): „nėra ortofoto“ reiškia du dalykus:

1) kad pozicija yra tik „primesta“, nes nesimato iš ortofoto tikslios;
2) kad ortofoto neatitinka situacijos ant žemės: prieš keičiant reikia būti atsargiam ir patikrinti kada žymė uždėta - ar nuo to laiko atsinaujino ortofoto ir galima patikslinti, ar nuo to laiko vis dar nėra atnaujintos ortofoto, ir reikėtų palikti ramybėje.
Snaiperis (2023-08-30 22:24:40+00:00): Patikrinau vietovė ir peržiūrėjau changeset history. Tu esi teisus dėl žymėjimo. fixme=nėra ortofoto ir buvo tai kas, mane suklaidino, nes supratau, kad "pažymėta" išmetimui radus pažymėtą objektą be ortofoto. Vieta žinoma, nes lankausi ir kioskas tikrai yra. Patikslinau (iš tikro downgradinau) jo vietą pagal naujausius Maxar ir nuėmiau fixme, nes tikrai objektas yra - jo nereik išmesti.
demon_box (2023-07-02 12:21:16+00:00): ciao Raffaele, il 27/04/23 con questo changeset hai messo tutti i tags del sentiero 415 DIRETTAMENTE sul sentiero e NON creando invece la relazione e metterceli qui dentro.... ho già sistemato tutto.... però PER FAVORE FAI UN PO' ATTENZIONE A COME STAI MAPPANDO!!! SE HAI DEI DUBBI CONTATTAMI, GRAZIE!! (ok pochi mesi fa mi hai detto che se trovo dei tuoi errori di sistemarli... però che coioni!!!!!) anche se siete stati incaricati dal CAI ma NON SIETE CAPACI A MAPPARE COME SI DEVE, NON FATELO CHE E' MEGLIO PER TUTTI, GRAZIE.
P.S.: se invece di usare quell'applicazione ciofecca che è iD avessi usato JOSM (come ti avevo vivamente consigliato ma ovviamente non mi hai voluto ascoltare) quest'ultima nel momento del salvataggio ti avrebbe avvertito di questo errore e l'avresti evitato....!!!!
--enrico
eggie (2023-04-27 19:18:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
pi11 (2023-04-29 22:26:22+00:00): Dag Jurgimap,

Een tijdje geleden heb je naastgelegen weg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447022717) als privaat aangepast. Recente Mapillary beelden (december 2022) tonen geen enkel bord dat de toegang verbiedt. Kan je dit onderbouwen?
2. Hetzelfde voor de dienstweg Meanderveld (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447022716). Ook deze heb je privaat gesteld. Staat dit ook effectief te plekke aan gegeven?
3. Je verwijdert met deze changeset een padje dat, weliswaar informeel, wel degelijk gebruikt wordt, getuige het uitgedunde gras op deze plaats. 

Groeten,
pi11