piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-04 17:31:04+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Trzebusz":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378364514
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/943792524
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149086244
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1340121950

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Nakaner-repair (2026-04-30 11:18:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 182028718 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user user_1890314. Reason: low quality contributions with Orgnaic Maps, personal notes, disrespect towards other mappers
German C (2024-12-04 21:31:08+00:00): Hola Jeydi C, bienvenida a Openstreetmap, gracias por aportar en Santander. Veo que actualizaste datos del edificio de la alcaldía que quedaba por la carrera 9, para el edificio de "alcaldía vieja" en Barbosa, observo que agregaste que la entidad o persona que opera ese edificio "alcaldía vieja" es "Estudiante" creo que debes ajustar esa etiqueta de "operator" al nombre del actual operador de ese edificio o la empresa que toma en arriendo ese edificio para mantenerlo en funcionamiento, si desconoces el nombre del operador de ese edificio puedes eliminar esa etiqueta.  Feliz día. En el siguiente link https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Colombia/Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear encontrarás una guía para mapear en Colombia.
dypa (2024-12-07 15:18:37+00:00): Привет, мне кажется не стоит использовать такую схему тегирования для тротуаров улиц, потому что для этих улиц уже сделан отдельный тротуар через  footway=sidewalk. Вы согласны с wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:sidewalk (Недостатки и преимущества по сравнению с альтернативами) ?

пример https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31376931 имеет отдельный тротуар https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042542072
LKAsahi (2024-12-31 18:28:30+00:00): Thank you for your contribution. However, please be mindful when you submit your changeset! You moved one node 305 meters away and disrupted all the normal paths.
Your changeset will be reverted.
eggie (2024-12-04 18:40:06+00:00): Dag Dexy   Wanneer je wegen wilt knippen schakel dan over naar editor JOSM  Nu gaan voortdurend de fietsroutes e.d stuk. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-12-04 18:50:34+00:00): Dexy  Zodra je knipt met editor iD  zijn de fietsrouterelaties stuk. 
Die editor kan niet met relaties omgaan.
In editor josm kan het wel... Dan ook eerst alle relaties laden en dan kun je ergens een knip zetten.
Of overschakelen naar josm of niet meer knippen zodra er een relatie overheen loopt.

editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047

Twee fietsroutes hersteld , weer aan laten sluiten op het fietsknooppunt. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-12-04 18:59:09+00:00): Zit nog even verder te kijken het wandelknooppunt 58 heb je ook verwijderd
eggie (2024-12-04 19:09:37+00:00): Reverted by changeset #159930727

Ik heb mijn eigen  verbeteringen ook teruggedraaid. Hier was zo veel schade en zo'n knoopunt weer inleggen is een heidens karwei.
Jou knipactie heb ik ook teruggedraaid.
Svp geen fiets en wandelknooppunten verwijderen en geen routerelaties bewerken todat je weet wat je aan het doen bent.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-12-04 19:18:23+00:00): Alle routerelaties zijn weer hersteld. Jouw aanpassingen op de Nieuweweg heb ik weer toegevoegd. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-12-04 19:22:10+00:00): De fiets- en wandelroutes kun je hier zien https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=17.0/52.3131/4.5883
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 23:59:07+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12396508913/history has bicycle:repair = assisted_self_service that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle:repair and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service:bicycle:repair
woodpeck (2024-12-04 22:22:38+00:00): Dear isajo25, thank you for your contribution to OSM. The changeset comment that you submit together with your edits is expected to explain, to an average human being, what your edit is about. Your changeset comment is "#hotosm-project-17762 #amazonia #niño #forest #fire #Mapeo_Amazonia" which explains nothing and is disrespectful to your fellow community members who try to make sense of your actions. Please put any hashtags you wish to use in the "hashtags" field, and put a human-readable comment in the "comment" field.
pavvv (2024-12-04 21:13:56+00:00): Czemu nie? Dostęp do obu dróg jest ten sam. Tym bardziej, że e głównych ciągach preferowana jest wyższa kategoria.
szalona_entropia (2024-12-05 08:39:41+00:00): Żeby to było spójne ze stosowaną przez Ciebie zasadą mapowania "od węzła do węzła" (która notabene też jest dyskusyjna). I dla przejrzystości  stosowania zasad. Jeżeli jest węzeł drogowy łączący 3 typy dróg (M, T, S), to jadąc z T na S nie powinienem musieć nigdzie wjeżdżać na M_link. Abstrahując od dostępu.
pavvv (2024-12-05 09:26:17+00:00): Np. w tym miejscu nie da się zrobić, żeby jadąc od strony Ostrowa jechało się tylko po trunkach. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/51.66582/17.85621

Jeżeli np. tu preferowana jest wyższa kategoria, to czemu na łącznikach nie powinna być?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/49.68207/19.16720
szalona_entropia (2024-12-05 09:29:29+00:00): 1. Więc być może ten węzeł jest do poprawy.
2. Bo na łącznikach mogę się znaleźć w drodze do/z DW946, a na odcinkach jezdni głównej o które pytasz - nie.
rempshaener (2024-12-05 16:35:48+00:00): Hallo,
du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Anpassungen gebeten.
Das sieht gut aus, ich habe keine Anmerkungen.
Viele Grüße
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 02:35:06+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165051606
pavvv (2024-12-04 21:16:33+00:00): Jak dla mnie pasuje link. Gdyby nie ten numer drogi, to czym się różni się ten wiadukt od zwykłej łącznicy?
szalona_entropia (2024-12-05 08:33:36+00:00): Na zwykłą łącznicę (jak na przykład S22 -> S7 zachód) jest zazwyczaj oznakowanie  "skrętu" - np. strzałki namalowane na jezdni. Dla kierunku S22 -> S7 wschód takiego oznakowania nie ma, pas ruchu S22 jest normalnie w tę stronę kontynuowany i nie trzeba nigdzie "zjeżdżać" wg nawigacji.
VA00 (2025-06-28 11:14:02+00:00): A cóż to za dziwaczne tagowanie dostępu do odcinka zwykłej drogi leśnej?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1044483729
Rodrigo Rega (2024-12-06 22:34:16+00:00): Reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160011031
eggie (2024-12-04 19:26:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback   Zou het wellicht building:levels =2 zijn?
Schuine dak hoort er dacht ik niet bij. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels
Ik heb de tags overgezet naar de gebouwomtrek.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
emersonveenstra (2024-12-05 22:38:31+00:00): Hi there,

For  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10067814800
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/475422045
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12006687521

it's best not to "overload" nodes by giving them two primary functions. If a bus stop has a bench and/or bike parking, you should map those as a separate node.
Aenet (2024-12-05 23:53:18+00:00): That’s understandble. Should I should guess and put the bike rack or bench as close to the bus stop as possible if I’m not surveying the location myself? I also see bench:yes/no as an acceptable tag for bus stops on the highway:bus_stop page. I’m just getting the info about whether there is a bike rack or bench from cata.org. Should even benches within shelters be mapped separately, in your opinion?
emersonveenstra (2024-12-06 11:29:53+00:00): i prefer mapping them separately, because there's a lot of detail like backrest, seats, etc. that you can add. I would just approximate where they are with aerial imagery
JayTurnr (2024-12-04 18:50:46+00:00): Sorry this was updating lane counts, not crossings
JayTurnr (2024-12-04 18:50:25+00:00): Sorry this was updating lane counts, not crossings
Monchinho (2024-12-05 10:18:29+00:00): Ola,

Está oficializado pola Xunta de Galicia e Galicia Nomeada como Quintás Novas. Por que o cambias?
Sanniu (2026-01-08 13:58:04+00:00): Hi, there is no such street nearby, but many unnamed ones, can you name the correct street?
mcliquid (2024-12-05 10:35:48+00:00): Sollte dieser Way nicht auch oneway sein?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1340142322
jeka p (2024-12-05 18:46:10+00:00): Stimmtss :)
muralito (2024-12-18 15:07:33+00:00): Me alegro que hayan terminado estas obras. Me acuerdo de ir kilometros y kilometros de trafico lento sin poder adelantar.

Ahora, este peaje de acá, segun lo que cobre, ¿no conviene esquivarlo?
Javierpf (2024-12-19 17:54:46+00:00): Hola Muralito, si está buenisima esta autovía nueva. Era terrible la lentitud de la vieja ruta 5 sobre todo en finde largos o vacaciones. Capaz que se puede evitar si antes peaje se busca tomar la ruta vieja por Anisacate. Pero justamente localidades como La Bolsa o Los Aromos son los que más demora tienen.
Glassman (2024-12-05 20:08:30+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159930876
Glassman (2024-12-05 20:12:10+00:00): We don't use descriptive names in OSM. Just tag the feature, for example, amenity=bench. Also, we don't use polygons for benches. This doesn't look like a bleacher. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159930906
Glassman (2024-12-05 20:21:50+00:00): I don't think it is a building and craft=electrician would indicate people work in there. I'm guessing it is some sort of electrical box so maybe power=box? Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:power
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159930913
jomamoj (2024-12-05 22:12:20+00:00): Das Level Tag macht Sinn, da die Parkebenen innerhalb des Parkhauses sind. Dann wäre es aber auch konsequent, die Ebene 0 mit level=0 zu bezeichnen. Beim Indoor Tagging ist Level ein mandatory Tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159930975
hk51 (2024-12-06 08:52:13+00:00): macht Sinn, habe es angepasst
jomamoj (2024-12-06 13:15:22+00:00): Danke :-)
Glassman (2024-12-05 20:15:30+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159930977
mcliquid (2024-12-05 10:15:58+00:00): Hi, Bus 440 fährt hier in beiden Richtungen im Kreis :) 
Schaust du dir das nochmal an?
jeka p (2024-12-05 18:49:52+00:00): Hi!
danke - habe korregiert.
SG
Glassman (2024-12-05 20:16:54+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159931050
Glassman (2024-12-05 20:09:36+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159931056
Glassman (2024-12-05 20:09:56+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159931131
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-12-05 11:48:45+00:00): Hi! Why did you remove traffic signals  tags for foot and cyclists here? uncontrolled is only when there is no traffic signals, and markings=yes is less precise than markings=lines
VLD284 (2024-12-05 22:28:16+00:00): Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligraphy, 
Upon reviewing my previous edits, I realize that I may have overlooked the pedestrian signals  at this location while checking street level imagery. My edits were based on the markings visible in aerial imagery, which led me to believe that the crossing was uncontrolled.
Thank you for pointing this out and providing feedback as well as fixing this so others have the correct information. I will be more diligent in my future edits :) 

Best regards,
Moriah
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-12-06 12:46:31+00:00): No problem thanks! Have a nice day!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-04 19:50:49+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889312372

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-12-04 20:31:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-12-04 20:34:34+00:00): Dag N-9  Eigenlijk tekenen we geen gebouwen zelf in.

Er wordt periodiek geupdated vanuit de BAG.
Dat kun je versnellen door een verzoek te doen op het forum van OSM in het draadje BAG importverzoeken.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-12-04 20:42:22+00:00): Voor nu even gefatsoeneerd en van BAG data voorzien.
chris66 (2025-11-25 14:45:12+00:00): Hast Du die TurnRestrictions wegen dem Poller eingetragen?

Falls ja, wird dadurch die Navigation gestört.
nekocake kitsu (2024-12-04 20:20:15+00:00): Ah! I was using Norway Orthophoto. Sorry for the confusion, I am new to the Vespucci OSM editor app, and I am still learning how to navigate the UI.
❤️‍🔥 (2024-12-05 12:29:00+00:00): Hi, did you intentionally remove Goat Island from the Port Jackson relation? See https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/15522136

The result is that the island appears underwater
jordol (2024-12-05 19:04:15+00:00): Apologies, definitely didn't intend to. Added back in changeset 159969313
❤️‍🔥 (2024-12-05 23:02:24+00:00): awesome thanks :)
rempshaener (2024-12-04 21:21:59+00:00): Hallo,
du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitung gebeten.

Wenn ich mir die Mapillary-Bilder anschauem war das vorherige sidewalk=both sicherlich falsch. Das cycleway:right=sidepath passt aber auch nicht wirklich. Ein gemeinsamer Geh- und Radweg ist ein „track“.
Ich würde es entsprechend der Beschilderung (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=112447408068504&focus=photo&lat=53.13623299145402&lng=11.045806760314008&z=17&x=0.6009929667798773&y=0.48893286900837185&zoom=0.8980477223427332) so taggen (das mit cycleway|sidewalk:left=no ist eher optional):

cycleway:right=track
cycleway:right:bicycle=designated
cycleway:right:segregated=no
cycleway:right:traffic_sign=DE:240
sidewalk:right=yes
sidewalk:left=no
cycleway:left=no

Ich orientiere mich dabei an https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren

Bei Fragen gerne melden.

Viele Grüße
Supaplex030 (2024-12-05 14:55:05+00:00): Hallo Fabian, toll, so viele neue Bäume in OSM zu sehen :) Welche Quelle hast du denn für die Daten genutzt? Das wäre gut, es in dem entsprechenden Feld anzugeben.

Ein Hinweis zu entfernten/gefällten Bäumen: Es ist ok, sie zu löschen, aber noch besser wäre es, statt dessen den Prefix "removed:" zu benutzen, also die Bäume zu behalten und "removed:natural=tree" draus zu machen (siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix). Oder "natural=tree_stump", falls noch ein Baumstumpf vorhanden ist. Falls mal jemand mit älteren Luftbildern o.ä. mappt, ist dann nämlich erkennbar, dass der Baum nicht mehr vorhanden ist.

Danke für deine Beiträge und falls du mal Fragen hast, melde dich gerne.

Beste Grüße
Alex
martien-176 (2024-12-07 19:27:37+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. 

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. 

Please check out these sources for more info: 
- Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
- Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ 
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159933214
Fraxi (2026-01-28 17:01:34+00:00): Мите, Камекс-М, освен, че се занимават с гранит, предлагат и изработка на мебели по поръчка. Т.е. n12396694978 може би трябва да се промени или да се създаде отделна точка за другата дейност. От южната страна на витрината има рекламен надпис за различните дейности.
Fraxi (2026-01-28 17:10:15+00:00): Даже може да не е от южната страна и да съм се объркал, но виж https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=503580227359195&focus=photo
Dimitar155 (2026-01-29 09:12:56+00:00): Ако са два обекта, може да се добави втора точка. Иначе ще започнем да приличаме на SEO агенция :). Добавих им сайта, името, телефононите и работното време. Мисля че е достатъчно.
habi (2025-06-20 13:42:10+00:00): Ciao spalinger
Hier hast du viele Addressen importiert, ohne zu schauen, ob da ein Gebäude ist.

Das wurde soeben in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4813952 <del>reklamiert</del>bemerkt.

Ich fände es besser, bei *jedem* importierten Datenpunkt zu schauen, ob da ein Gebäude auf den Orthofotos dazu auftaucht, und - wenn das Gebäude fehlt - dieses auch noch einzuzeichnen.

Kannt du das noch nachholen?

Gruss aus Bern,
happy mapping,
habi
spalinger (2025-06-20 22:57:02+00:00): Ciao habi
Ist mit www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167893213 korrigiert.
Seit Längerem zeichne ich nun auch fehlende Gebäude ein 👍.
Gruss zurück!
mjacon (2024-12-23 08:31:09+00:00): https://dziennik.lodzkie.eu/WDU_E/2024/10661/akt.pdf
smichae (2024-12-05 02:56:14+00:00): Nice edits! Thanks for improving the map!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934176
Glassman (2024-12-06 03:25:14+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934260
Glassman (2024-12-06 03:30:47+00:00): power lines are not connect to streets. Can you review this edit and fix it. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:power for more information on power lines
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934320
Glassman (2024-12-06 03:42:13+00:00): We don't use descriptive names in OSM. Can you remove the name and add a tag to describe what 2-3 Trees is? If it is just the number of trees, then you could place a node for each tree.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934368
Glassman (2024-12-06 03:46:29+00:00): A gate should just be a node on the road otherwise routers don't understand that a gate is in the path. Can you fix this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934374
Glassman (2024-12-06 22:28:42+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

I would recommend using Bing imagery since it is more up to date
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934386
multimodaal (2024-12-04 23:23:08+00:00): Dankjewel!
Glassman (2024-12-06 03:25:47+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934455
Glassman (2024-12-06 03:26:44+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934455
Glassman (2024-12-06 03:26:45+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934455
Glassman (2024-12-06 22:33:14+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934471
Glassman (2024-12-06 22:29:00+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934488
Glassman (2024-12-06 22:35:22+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934506
Glassman (2024-12-06 22:40:22+00:00): We don't use descriptive names. Also, this looks more like landuse=grass. Can you review?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934544
Glassman (2024-12-06 03:32:29+00:00): We don't use descriptive names. Instead of a polygon, I'd create a way and tagged it as natural=tree_row. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree_row
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934546
gscholz (2024-12-14 07:35:52+00:00): Hi raphaelmirc,
this changeset has created several errors regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-34.82208&lat=-7.69913&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way


https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=159934547

Especially the boundary of "Área de Proteção Ambiental de Santa Cruz" was affected here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/758704504

I have reverted this changeset to fix these issues.
Kind regards
Guido
umbraosmbr (2024-12-14 15:36:19+00:00): Good afternoon!

Thank you for converting the error caused by my edits in this area!

Kind regards,

Raphael de assis
umbraosm
Glassman (2024-12-06 03:47:58+00:00): stop signs should be on the way with the direction based on the direction the way was drawn. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dstop
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934559
Glassman (2024-12-06 03:48:50+00:00): again, just a node showing a barrier and the type of barrier on the road.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934615
Glassman (2024-12-06 22:41:25+00:00): The speed bump should be a node on the parking aisle.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934617
Glassman (2024-12-06 03:34:11+00:00): This node needs a tag. Although I'm not sure what a water exit pipe is so I'm unable to offer a suggestion. I did remove the node since it wasn't tagged.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934628
Glassman (2024-12-06 03:34:36+00:00): This node needs a tag. Although I'm not sure what a water pipe is so I'm unable to offer a suggestion. I did remove the node since it wasn't tagged.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159934656