piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2023-09-10 10:51:06+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Please do not map walled yards without buildings as a building,
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141055388
Frans S (2023-09-10 10:47:32+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
B: Overlapping buildings.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapping them as 1 building.
H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing into the mapping.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141055417
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 05:03:14+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365846
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 05:03:08+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365843
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 05:03:02+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365841
martien-176 (2023-09-10 10:31:03+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. 

Please avoid mapping several buildings as one building. Every building must be traced separately. Zoom in as close as possible to see the outline of the buildings, hit each corner of the building carefully. Look for shadows, open ground, changes in roof color and vegetation to differentiate buildings.

Also pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. 

Please watch these 2 short video for more info: 
-Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
-Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ 

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141055740
martien-176 (2023-09-10 10:26:52+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. 

Please avoid mapping several buildings as one building. Every building must be traced separately. Zoom in as close as possible to see the outline of the buildings, hit each corner of the building carefully. Look for shadows, open ground, changes in roof color and vegetation to differentiate buildings.

Also pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. 

Please watch these 2 short video for more info: 
-Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
-Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ 

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141055748
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 05:02:55+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365840
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 05:02:49+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365836
Frans S (2023-09-10 10:25:53+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapping them as 1 building.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141055985
Frans S (2023-09-10 10:41:59+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
B: Overlapping buildings.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapping them as 1 building.
H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing into the mapping.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141056065
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 05:02:43+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365835
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 05:02:37+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365833
Frans S (2023-09-10 10:30:32+00:00): Hello Thanks for mapping on this project
Please don't use the highway= residential tag in rural areas like here. This road is not aligned to the imagery as well.  Use unclassified here.
The buildings themselves need to be mapped as well,
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141056132
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 05:02:30+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365832
Frans S (2023-09-10 10:39:43+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
E. Buildings not squared.
G: include the shadow of a building in the mapping.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141056389
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 05:02:24+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365829
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 05:02:21+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365827
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 05:02:16+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365826
eggie (2023-09-10 13:34:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM   Please decrease your edit area..
Stick to a smal area. 
It's all over Europe in one changeset. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/LufyCZ/history#map=7/50.647/10.797

Greetz,
eggie
LufyCZ (2023-09-10 13:51:43+00:00): Ah, sorry, was excited to add as much as I could, will try to keep it more local
eggie (2023-09-10 13:54:34+00:00): 😀

Happy mapping!
Greetz
eggie
Tomas Straupis (2023-09-10 16:00:50+00:00): Jei ką, tai „parking“ yra vietos, kurios yra pažymėtos atitinkamu kelio ženklu „P“. Vieta, kur kiemuose statomos mašinos nėra „parkingas“. Priešingu atveju visi miestai bus ištisinis „parkingas“ ir tada toks žymėjimas praras bet kokią prasmę.
Luzandro (2025-05-08 10:16:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4738156
Frans S (2023-09-12 14:11:35+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please tag buildings not as landuse=residential but as building=yes
Best regards
eggie (2023-09-10 11:17:59+00:00): De track die je hier op slot hebt gezet voor fietsers is een onderdeel van MTB route MTB-route Strabrechtse Heide?
Die is nu geblokkeerd. Heb je hier bij stilgestaan en hoe kom je hier tot bicycle=no?
http://www.vvvheeze-leende.nl/go/mountainbikeroutes

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-10 11:25:15+00:00): Nou die link die op dat mtb pad staat doet het niet meer...
Je wordt wel doorgeschakeld naar https://www.degrooteheide.eu/nl/ontdekken/gemeenten-van-de-groote-heide/heeze-leende, maar daar vind ik niets over mtb.
Wel bord staat hier vooraan en weet je iets van die mtb route? 
Wanneer die route daat niet meer is over dat stuk zou die best anders kunnen lopen?
gr eggie
swinxnl (2023-09-10 11:27:39+00:00): Ah, dat is niet zo handig van mij dan inderdaad.

Waarom?
Omdat het met een gewone fiets niet echt makkelijk fietst.
Omdat er een gewoon fietspad naast ligt dat wel goed fietst.
Omdat je allemaal wandelaars omver rijdt.
En omdat de wandelaars vinden dat het een wandelpad is.

Maar dat telt wellicht niet natuurlijk.
Mijn excuus.
eggie (2023-09-10 11:31:30+00:00): Oke duidelijk😀..
Dat heet rekening met elkaar houden en dat soms best lastig in ons volle landje.

Haal je zelf bicycle=no weg?


Mvg
eggie
eggie (2023-09-10 11:33:36+00:00): De veldweg staat al op grade4 en surface=sand.. Een goede routingapp zal dan voor het fietspad kiezen.. De mtb er voor de uitdaging.
eggie (2023-09-10 13:28:28+00:00): accesstags aangepast ivm mtb route
swinxnl (2023-09-10 14:40:16+00:00): Ja je hebt gelijk denk ik.
Bedankt voor het terug wijzigen.
Ik zal er de volgende keer extra over nadenken.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 05:02:09+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365825
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:58:14+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365782
rhtb0 (2023-09-10 11:15:32+00:00): 　​​​​　　​　​　​　​　​　​
rhtb0 (2023-09-10 11:15:39+00:00): ​​
rhtb0 (2023-09-10 11:16:00+00:00): ​​​
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:58:04+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365780
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:57:57+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365778
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-17 05:40:03+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11180842510/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:57:51+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365777
nw520 (2023-11-07 17:05:22+00:00): Hallo Lutscher1999, bitte beachte beim Aufspalten von Straßen, dass dies auch Auswirkungen auf Routen (Radwanderwege, Buslinien, etc.) haben kann. So werden beispielsweise Löcher hineingerissen oder Busse fahren entgegen der Einbahnstraßenrichtung. Ich weiß nicht, inwiefern das im Webeditor/iD behoben werden kann, aber falls es möglich sein sollte, würde ich mich freuen, wenn du ein Auge daraufwerfen könntest.
nw520 (2023-11-07 17:32:34+00:00): Weshalb hast du https://osm.org/way/35834882 zu einer Plattform gemacht?
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:57:44+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365776
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:57:38+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365774
Tomas_J (2023-09-27 21:24:34+00:00): Ahoj,
dakujem za editaciu a zlepsenie mapy - skvela praca. Za mna jedna mala pripomienka: skutocne chodnik konci v bode https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11180900785 a nepokracuje uz ani ako vyslapana cesticka (highway=path)? Je dobre chodnik na oboch koncoch spojit s nejakou cestou alebo inou komunikaciou, ak je po nom mozne fyzicky na tuto komunikaciu prejst. Inak ak je zmapovany ako slepy, tak navigacie po nom nebudu navigovat. Ak by si mal otazky, mozes napisat aj do skupiny https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk
Tomas_J
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:57:35+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365771
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:57:28+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365769
Larmax (2023-09-10 11:39:18+00:00): in Nousiainen*
olo81 (2023-12-22 23:40:51+00:00): nie rozdzielamy ciągów pieszo rowerowych na osobne linie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery

do poprawy
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:57:20+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365768
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:57:12+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365767
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:57:04+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365764
pyrog (2023-10-21 08:45:02+00:00): Bonjour Baudoin,

Pour info le point d'eau https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3161572846 n'est pas une "pompe" reliée à un puit.
C'est une simple borne fontaine.

Cordialement,
Yves
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:56:57+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365763
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:56:49+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365760
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:56:43+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365759
SzymonH (2023-09-10 12:40:17+00:00): Co miałeś na celu likwidując zajezdnię? To zwyczajny wandalizm
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:56:36+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365757
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:56:31+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365755
SomeoneElse (2023-09-10 17:57:15+00:00): These changesets https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141059419 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141066786 , and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141073455 revert a series of mechanical edits of cycle network info.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15020 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2023-September/030649.html for more information.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:56:24+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365754
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:56:16+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365752
pbnoxious (2023-09-11 10:40:55+00:00): Hi, du hast hier nicht nur die Verbindung richtung osten gelöscht, sondern auch den ausgebauten Radweg unterbrochen. Ich denke mal, das ist ein Fehler, neulich gabs den noch.
grobi (2023-09-11 18:33:52+00:00): Hallo, vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Das war tatsächlich ein Fehler meinerseits. Habs gerade ausgebessert. Müsste jetzt wieder stimmen.
Dodko (2023-09-10 18:08:39+00:00): Adresu z KIK a Datart som vymazal a dal na budovu.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141074571
Frans S (2023-09-11 09:31:22+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapping them as 1 building.
E. Buildings not squared.
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141060123
Frans S (2023-09-11 10:24:35+00:00): Hi. Another (small) remark, 
Don't tag small waterways as a drain. (man made) in these areas. Stream is a good tag when you can jump over it, otherwise 'river
Best regards
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:56:09+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365749
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:55:58+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365747
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:55:51+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365745
Frans S (2023-09-10 12:44:59+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Please use the Bing Imagery to get a better picture. It shows more shadows, so the buildings can be identified better. Mappings should be aligned with the Esri Imagery.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141060645
trampintheforest (2024-07-17 21:09:43+00:00): Is it really forbidden to use the bike there or did you just want to avoid bicycle routing?

Maybe you could add a note that it's legal but not recommended or just set a very short piece of the street to bicycle=no so that it's obvious that it is just for routing purpose when you see it on the map (openandromaps renders this tag).

Kind regards
Shaun das Schaf (2025-01-04 20:18:15+00:00): Hallo HTMLSniper, warum wurde hier der Radfahr- und Fußgängerverlehr auf verboten gesetzt? Soweit ich das sehe, gibt es keine Schilder, die das Radfahren oder Gehen hier verbieten.

Wie auch in dieser Notiz angemerkt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4277191
Shaun das Schaf (2025-01-04 20:23:50+00:00): Ach, gerade erst gesehen dass trampintheforest ja schon gefragt hatte. Da bisher keine Reaktion erfolgt ist, werde ich das bicycle=no und foot=no wieder entfernen. Ich konnte keine Schilder finden, die das Radfahren oder Gehen hier verbieten.
une abeille (2023-09-11 13:04:22+00:00): Hi, I already added this cycle lane a few days ago. It is now duplicated. Can you please undo your changes?
une abeille (2023-09-12 12:02:54+00:00): I have reverted this change. Your version did not even intersect with any roads and would not have been usable by routing software. Please review the errors before uploading changes to OSM.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141160033
Frans S (2023-09-10 12:40:33+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapping them as 1 building.
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141060795
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:55:45+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365742
YomanNH (2023-09-11 07:37:04+00:00): Cześć,
planowane drogi tagujemy jako highway=proposed. Poprawiłem.
LightAsAFeather (2023-09-24 07:48:20+00:00): Hey, and thanks for the contribution!

A small note about the operator tag: It should contain just the name of the operator, not the website. There's a subkey for that: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator:website

So I would suggest the following changes:

operator=Turku
operator:website=https://www.turku.fi/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141061089
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:55:37+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365739
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:55:30+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365736
une abeille (2023-09-11 13:03:14+00:00): Bonjour, la piste était déjà là. Je l'ai ajouté il y a quelques jours. Maintenant il y a deux pistes. Est-ce que vous pouvez annulez vos changes?
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:55:24+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365734
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:55:14+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365731
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:55:08+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365728
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:55:02+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365726
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:54:56+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365725
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:54:50+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365723
silversurfer83 (2023-09-10 15:28:27+00:00): removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141068577
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141061810
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:54:43+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365721
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:54:37+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365719
kwiatek_123 (2023-09-11 15:09:44+00:00): Kropka to nie jest poprawny opis zmian.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:54:31+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365717
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:54:25+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365716
gscholz (2023-09-11 05:39:46+00:00): Hi Danielhiii,
this changset has created several errors int eh OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-69.99432&lat=12.52281&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141062380

Can you please fix this?

May be you also like ti educate yourself about how bus routes are edited properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation#Bus_route

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-09-12 05:22:25+00:00): Hi Danielhiii, 
this errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2023-09-13 07:02:26+00:00): Hi Danielhiii, 
due to your missing response I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
D=SW (2023-09-10 13:17:09+00:00): *اضافة قرية
eggie (2023-09-10 18:28:27+00:00): Dag Schakkebroek.. Er staat verkeersbord G7 getagd, maar dan mag je daar toch niet fietsen?
Of is er een onderbord dat zegt fietsen toegestaan?

MVG
eggie
Peter Bremer (2023-10-04 19:31:50+00:00): Hi Simon, I removed the cycling ways you put in here. These aren't separate cycling ways but cycling lanes on the road surface, and these are normally added with cycleway=lane on the main road.
Koregan (2023-09-10 13:27:22+00:00): Problem auf höchster Zoom-Stufe bleibt trotzdem bestehen.
In der Karte ist die Auffahr-/Abfahrsituation nicht erkennbar.