piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Carto'Cité (2024-01-05 12:28:21+00:00): Hé bien c'est parfait parce que dans l'ensemble je suis d'accord avec tout ce que tu dis et comme sur cette thématique c'est très rarement le cas, on peut déjà célébrer ça 😀
Donc les quelques différences que j'évoque doivent vraiment être considérées sur cette base d'accord.
La principale différence concerne le bicycle=yes ou bicycle=designated. Pour moi à partir du moment où un chemin de type highway=path ou highay=footway a signalétique proche ou lointaine (comprendre qui n'a pas été répété synthétiquement partout) c'est bicycle=designated. Je réserve le bicycle=yes pour les cas particuliers où le vélo est censé être interdit, par exemple un highway=footway, mais il est de fait autorisé (par exemple pour une jonction obligatoire sans panneau cycliste pied à terre) mais il n'y a pas de signalétique pour le confirmer (là on repasserait sur du bicycle=designated) ; c'est le cas de certaines portions sur trottoir ; là où toi tu utiliserais bicycle=permissive mais je crois que ce tag ne signifie pas ça et pose un risque d'interprétation un peu élevé (simple opinion discutable). Bien-sûr le bicycle=yes sert aussi pour contrebalancer des access=no ou autre interdiction qui ne s'appliquerait pas au vélo.
Et sinon pour décrire les trottoirs, je suis totalement ok avec le fait que highway=footway + footway=sidewalk est équivalent (avec les subtilités que ça peut impliquer) à highway=path + path=sidewalk ; on peut d'ailleur utiliser highway=cycleway + cycleway=sidewalk pour les pistes qui sont clairement sur trottoir du moment que les foot=yes et le segregated=yes/no est présent si les piétons l'empruntent également. Je mets footway=sidewalk si le trottoir existait avant d'être une piste et j'ai tendance à mettre cycleway=sidewalk quand l'aménagement a été créé pour les cyclistes à sa création mais qu'il s'agit clairement d'un trottoir et qu'il est aussi par les piétons. Ce que je ne fais pas car je pense qu'il ne faut pas c'est mélanger par exemple highway=path + footway=sidewalk.
Il y a eu un débat récemment encore sur footway VS path VS cycleway ; nous partageons la même approche mais ce n'est pas le cas de tout le monde et j'aimerais qu'on reparle encore d'une harmonisation des pratiques lors d'un SotM.
Encore merci pour tes retours !
Et toujours à ta disposition pour en discuter.
Charles
_Mathieu_ (2024-01-26 12:18:53+00:00): Oublié de mentionner : panneau C113 en début de piste (mal positionné, mais ça c'est autre chose...), non répété à l'intersection avec la rue Amédée Dufaure (mais le marquage au sol est présent sur l'intersection)
Carto'Cité (2024-01-29 10:38:37+00:00): Salut Mathieu,
Merci pour ton retour ! J'ai ajouté l'information du panneau C113 :)
Charles
aTarom (2023-09-08 13:35:28+00:00): Hello, what was wrong with the sculpture to delete it and pass it to a simple node, losing the history of the element? Is this an inadvertent error?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/295826465/history
Jerome-Herbinet (2023-09-08 13:50:22+00:00): Hello,

It wasn't a mistake; here are the reasons why I made the change: 

The work was represented by a line made of unconnected segments (lots of errors noticed by ID). In my opinion, it should at least have been a polygon. Also, and without wishing to be unkind, the shape of the object was too approximate (the animal's legs were huge in relation to its body, and there was no tail), so it didn't necessarily do any good. In this case, we'd better have a simple relevant POI at the right place (simpler, clearer and more effective, it seems to me, especially as cartography should remain cartography, not design).

What do you think ?

That said, if you really think I've made a mistake (and I would be sorry for that), we can go back, but I don't know how to do that.
aTarom (2023-09-08 14:18:28+00:00): Thank you for answering, I will pass the question to the Catalan group to decide together whether to recover the figure and adjust it more to reality respecting the history of the element
aTarom (2023-09-08 17:10:41+00:00): The Catalan community decided to recover the history of the element and update the shape
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/295826465/history
thank you for your collaboration
gscholz (2023-09-09 06:17:30+00:00): Hi ObracBenfica
this changeset has created several errors regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-52.08895&lat=-3.12393&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140986882

This kind o error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-09-14 06:48:26+00:00): Hi ObracBenfica,
due to your missing response I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
aseidel (2023-09-12 15:18:28+00:00): Lieber Garstedter,
darf ich fragen, warum Du in diesem Bereich bei vielen Wegen die smoothness-Angaben gelöscht hast? Die Mapperin ehoi hatte hier im Juli eine Befahrung vorgenommen und die Wege entsprechend bewertet. Anhand der Mapillary-Bilder finde ich ihre Bewertungen zumindest zum Teil nachvollziehbar (vielleicht wäre ich bei manchen Wegen eher auf eine etwas bessere Bewertung gekommen). Wenn Du der Ansicht bist, dass die Wege eine bessere Bewertung verdient haben, wäre es nett, wenn Du die Tags entsprechend ändern könntest, statt sie zu löschen. Die smoothness-Angabe ist ja doch recht hilfreich für alle Datennutzer.
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
Udarian (2023-09-16 07:35:44+00:00): I doubt that these roads are tolled, what is the source for this commit?
gurglypipe (2023-09-08 14:40:32+00:00): Unless I’m mistaken, the relation doesn’t exist.

If you’re going to delete the ncn tag, please create the relation first. Otherwise you’re just removing useful data from OSM.
Kovoschiz (2023-09-08 17:32:58+00:00): This user has been mass removing `*cn=yes` in cases where the `route=bicycle` doesn't exist.
Kovoschiz (2023-09-08 17:52:55+00:00): Eg https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140987678 
And `route=bicycle` removed on `highway=` without belonging such  a `type=route`. This can be valid if the class of `*cn=yes` wasn't determined yet, https://osmcha.org/changesets/140798528 
Fundamentally `*cn=yes` is acceptable. `ref=` and `network=` aren't removed from roads with `route=road` created.
SomeoneElse (2023-09-10 17:59:14+00:00): This changeset (and many others by the same author) were reverted by changesets https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141059419 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141066786 , and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141073455 .  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15020 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2023-September/030649.html for more information.
LockOnGuy (2023-09-08 14:19:23+00:00): Hello, I think the religion you added is wrong. Muslims do not pray at churches, christens do.       
I will fix this changeset.    
Best regards.
LockOnGuy (2023-09-08 14:46:20+00:00): Hello, I have corrected the place in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140990286      
Best regards.
bxl-forever_repair (2023-09-08 15:04:03+00:00): Well done, many thanks.
Udarian (2023-09-16 07:33:39+00:00): I doubt that secondary roads should have toll=yes on them, what is the source for this commit
LockOnGuy (2023-09-08 14:25:01+00:00): Hi, This is not border control checkpoint! it is inside Iraq how can it be "border control" this is a checkpoint operated by the Iraqi federal police not the border police, I will fix this too.    
Regards.
LockOnGuy (2023-09-08 14:31:28+00:00): I have deleted the node as it's duplicate, and the changeset comment I added is: delete duplicate node, this is a police check point not "border control" the description is misleading as it's only for foreigners and sometimes the police ask for the ID of Iraqis as a security thing.
bxl-forever_repair (2023-09-08 14:33:32+00:00): Thanks a lot.  As you can see, I am trying to fix changeset 140963632 where a user created about 160 nodes with weird tags.
Removing this POI is probably better, indeed.
LockOnGuy (2023-09-08 14:33:25+00:00): Hello, I have corrected the tags to police=checkpoint      
Regards.
Kovoschiz (2023-09-08 17:31:28+00:00): Have you discussed this before? The situation is `surface:colour=` means the `*cn=yes` . as such it can only have one `network=` , making `network=` usable. These `route=bicycle` are not really existing, and I don't agree with `network:type=basic_network`.
SomeoneElse (2023-09-10 18:00:05+00:00): This changeset (and many others by the same author) were reverted by changesets https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141059419 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141066786 , and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141073455 .  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15020 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2023-September/030649.html for more information.
gscholz (2023-09-09 06:18:15+00:00): Hi ObracBenfica
this changeset has created several errors regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-52.08895&lat=-3.12393&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140986882

This kind o error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
mga_geo (2023-10-16 05:45:09+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi avoir ajouté le noeud Berthault sans rôle en fin de la relation 6346695 ?
Cet arrêt figurait déjà.
Je corrige.
Marc
basilisk (2023-12-17 16:08:42+00:00): А в доме №1 точно есть магазин дверей? (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11176644869). Вроде обошёл по кругу, кроме озона и сквирела нет ничего. Или уже съехали?
pooh79 (2023-12-17 16:32:55+00:00): Может, уже и съехали двери. 
Я летом видел вывеску.
Да и на яндекс панорамах летних видно.
https://yandex.by/maps/153/brest/?l=stv%2Csta&ll=23.773820%2C52.108776&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=115.186436%2C3.018293&panorama%5Bfull%5D=true&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=23.740291%2C52.080611&panorama%5Bspan%5D=65.156508%2C26.904573&z=19
basilisk (2023-12-17 17:57:49+00:00): Точно, уже их там нет. Там уже озон. Точку удалил. 

Спасибо за уточнение!
Udarian (2023-09-16 07:23:16+00:00): starting off with a slight disclaimer here, I do not know the area but, why did you completely remove all data from Alabama River Parkway, what is the source for this. since data such as name=Alabama River Parkway, and toll=no are completely valid data. also dont just remove name_1, convert it to alt_name (for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:name_1).
Lavazza Coffe Shop (2023-09-08 17:53:24+00:00): Hi
Superadlen (2023-09-08 14:37:12+00:00): Merci
dpolovinkin (2025-04-01 04:17:45+00:00): hi, in future please leave comments about what exactly are you changing in OSM, it's not allowed to not leave comments like "no comment"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments

or

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
eggie (2023-09-09 06:10:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Geen naam voor deze kroeg?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-09-09 06:16:35+00:00): Dag Gelderscheblom.. Zijn dit werkelijk vakantiewoningen? 
Er zijn hier al adresnodes... Adressen toevoegen is niet nodig in OSM.
Ik heb deze vermelding voorlopig verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
sanchi (2023-09-08 15:40:31+00:00): Hola. 
Te he revertido este cambio. Has añadido toda la información de un sitio de Sevilla pero lo has añadido en Salamanca.
Saludos
JezCrow (2023-09-09 16:47:43+00:00): Laurence Jackson Sports Village in Slapewath? I disagree - Slapewath is only the tiny hamlet next to Charltons, not a wider area of Guisborough town.
Paul Berry (2023-09-09 21:08:52+00:00): Would you say it's Charltons instead?
JezCrow (2023-09-09 22:52:47+00:00): The Sports Village (way 89549933) and wider school grounds are part of Guisborough in my opinion so don't need an additional addr:suburb tag - it's nearly two miles to Slapewath from there and Charltons is even further away!
Paul Berry (2023-09-10 10:17:45+00:00): Sorry, just had a fresh look and I've clearly mistagged this. Now corrected on changeset #141055963. Thanks for pointing it out.
mcliquid (2023-09-11 11:30:49+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
vis-major (2023-09-11 15:45:26+00:00): I was on both spots in person, i guess i forgot to upload my change in the Vespucci app. So it was a batch of 2 changes in different locations.
eggie (2023-09-08 20:36:40+00:00): Dag Remco... 
motor_vehicle was toch = no hier?
De bedoeling is dat emergency=yes dat overruled.
Nu zet je het open voor regulier verkeer.
Kijk je nog even?
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2023-09-09 12:51:48+00:00): Ik heb motor_vehicle=no weer toegevoegd anders staat het gewoon open voor regulier  verkeer. 
Voor hulpdiensten zal het wel routeren. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-09 12:54:43+00:00): Advies ...wel het hele traject nog checken anders valt de routering stil.
mp747474 (2023-09-09 06:20:31+00:00): Warum nur forward? Meines Wissens gibt es keinen anderen Weg legal in diese Straße zu kommen, da alle von der Ginnheimer Hohl abzweigenden Straßen Sackgassen oder Einbahnstraßen sind.
theraser (2023-09-23 14:26:05+00:00): Ich prüfe es nochmal vor Ort, aber aus Richtung Raimundstraße fehlt im Zweifel einfach die Beschilderung. Ansonsten ist der Hinweis natürlich völlig berechtigt, so macht es logisch betrachtet wenig Sinn!
theraser (2023-09-26 13:32:56+00:00): Habe es mir noch einmal angeguckt: es ist vor Ort genau so beschildert, wie ich es jetzt eingetragen habe. Es macht auch in gewisser Weise Sinn: man darf zwar von der Hügelstraße einfahren, aber es kann einem dort niemand sonst mit einem LKIW entgegen kommen. Die Ausfahrt ist dann nur über die Ginnheimer Landstraße möglich.
tonyf1 (2023-11-28 10:13:23+00:00): Hi, why isn't Geden tharpa choling monastery the name? It was given to me  by by my guide as the name.
Tony
bxl-forever_repair (2023-11-28 16:54:40+00:00): OK, you may be right about this one, which could be a real name.

(This changeset was part of a large collection of changes aimed at removing implausible names, we found it a bit suspicious.)

I restored the name, as you said.  If you visited this place, can you please confirm the kind of religion for it, because that is needed for the map.  Shall it be hindu?
tonyf1 (2023-12-04 10:15:47+00:00): guide said it was Buddhist, done
jcr83 (2023-09-09 20:30:11+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour votre contribution à MapRoulette. Cependant, ici, cela ne peut pas être une voie de service, c'est au mieux le sentier qui borde le canal (highway=path)
Mevess (2023-09-09 20:37:33+00:00): Hey !
J'ai mis voie de service dans le sens où elle existe pour desservir et entretenir le canal, mais je me suis allé un peu loin dans l'interprétation de "service".
Je corrige..
Bonne soirée !
NJ
Taya_S (2023-09-25 11:39:49+00:00): Hello Sappho,

I assume this was just a mistake, but you removed the place=island tag and added a natural=bare_rock tag to the island of Icario. I reverted those 2 changes.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3304440/history

Sincerely,
Taya
augil (2023-09-25 17:41:51+00:00): Thanks, I haven't noticed.
Metzor (2023-09-11 10:36:09+00:00): Hallo!

Magst du mal schauen, ob du in diesem Changeset ausversehen einen Landwirtschatfsweg zur Bundesstraße gemacht hast?

Es geht um diesen Weg:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97717256/history

Viele Grüße 
Metzor
Olaf der Mapper (2023-09-19 21:23:30+00:00): Hab den Unfug wieder gelöscht. LG, Olaf
Olaf der Mapper (2023-09-19 21:32:36+00:00): Auch hier nur Unfug: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527909541

Ein Admin sollte alle 5 Changesets reverten und den User sperren. LG, Olaf
DD1GJ (2023-09-20 07:18:45+00:00): Hallo Olaf, danke für Deinen Hinweis.

Ich habe alles von Geilo3001 mit JOSM und dem Reverter Plugin rückgängig gemacht. Das kann jeder Mapper machen. Dafür muss man kein Admin sein.

In solchen Fällen ist es wichtig, Korrekturen nicht mit eigenen Bearbeitungen zu vermischen. Dies gibt dann beim Zurücksetzten jede Menge Konflikte mit dem zehnfachen Bearbeitungsaufwand.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141497655

Grundsätzlich ist ein Revert den Einzelkorrekturen vorzuziehen, damit wirklich alles wieder dem vorherigen Zustand entspricht.

Viele Grüße, Joachim
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-08 15:30:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11176894531

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Dawid2849 (2023-09-08 15:32:19+00:00): naprawione
javbw (2024-04-08 10:27:04+00:00): badly mapped "pond" - which is actually a concrete driveway around a marina. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206166845#map=19/36.07409/140.21776

Please be more careful when mapping what you don't know.
felipeeugenio (2023-09-09 13:11:31+00:00): Los Institutos Profesionales son College
map per (2023-09-08 15:48:47+00:00): Thanks for doing all the tedious fixing work 💪
bxl-forever_repair (2023-09-08 16:57:06+00:00): You're welcome!
aTarom (2023-09-09 13:43:10+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM, is the bus stop
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11176938837/history
on a public or private line? I can't find any stops on the municipal transportation map
astradotblue (2023-09-16 23:03:23+00:00): Hello CrimsonCaribou,

When adding opening_hours can you make sure to use the minus symbol (-) and not mdash (—) as the times aren't displayed properly
CrimsonCaribou (2023-09-29 20:03:55+00:00): Good spot! That's never happenend to me before, must be an autocorrect thing. I'll keep an eye out, thanks.
felipeeugenio (2023-09-09 13:09:23+00:00): Hola. Building es para la estructura, no para el recinto completo
gpserror (2023-09-08 16:47:15+00:00): Hi, I had a few comments:
Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206178884 seems to be disconnected from the road network, you might want to attach it.  Also since the driveway that's closest to it is marked private, your driveway should also be marked private.
I'm also not sure what needs to be done for https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3877778 - was it already done here?
jnighan (2023-09-08 16:17:44+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Connecticut/Highway_classification
gscholz (2023-09-09 06:19:28+00:00): Hi ObracBenfica
this changeset has created several errors regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-52.08895&lat=-3.12393&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140994064

This kind o error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
user_5359 (2023-09-08 17:32:29+00:00): Welcome to oSM! I remove your SEEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys).
FUZZY_42 (2026-04-29 14:09:08+00:00): Is there any source in the geographical community about the existence of this sea?
*Martin* (2026-04-29 14:17:22+00:00): https://www.skgeodesy.sk/files/sk/slovensky/ugkk/geodezia-kartografia/standardizacia-geografickeho-nazvoslovia/nazvy-geografickych-objektov-z-uzemia-mimo-sr/exonyma-januar_2022.pdf
DavidKarlas (2023-09-13 12:19:54+00:00): Reverted because bad data

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141208542
emersonveenstra (2023-09-09 14:52:30+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your contributions, however please be careful when mapping, you accidentally renamed Division Avenue "DreamPirate Gallery"
Jrachi (2025-07-10 06:30:52+00:00): Ciao.
I tag di accesso sono pensati per le way.
Sulle relazioni puoi usare il tag state=close

Ivo
gurglypipe (2023-09-08 17:44:17+00:00): Hi, the name ‘Cumbrian Mountains’ isn’t really used locally for these mountains. If anything it’s a synonym for ‘The Lake District’ or ‘The Lakes’. So I’m not sure it merits a separate node.

You might want to add name:sk to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/287917 instead.
*Martin* (2023-09-09 18:57:18+00:00): Hi. Thanks for noticing. I will check it tomorrow.
*Martin* (2023-09-13 09:12:49+00:00): Hello. "Cumbrian Mountains" is also mentioned at wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_District

It should be "The mountains (or 'fells') of the Lake District"
gurglypipe (2023-09-13 09:23:05+00:00): “Cumbrian Mountains” is mentioned on Wikipedia, yes, but as a local I’ve barely ever heard them called that.

In any case, the name refers precisely to the mountains within the Lake District national park, so I still think it’s appropriate to move name:sk=Kumbrické vrchy to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/287917 — unless there’s a Slovakian translation of “Lake District National Park” which would be more appropriate to use?
*Martin* (2023-09-13 09:31:00+00:00): Then I propose to change name="Cumbrian Mountains" to local_name="Cumbrian Mountains" or to remove the "name" tag completely and only leave "name:sk". The name should belong to mountains and not to the lake.

I have the name "Kumbrické vrchy" from Slovak authority of foreign names.
gurglypipe (2023-09-13 11:08:17+00:00): Just to check there’s no misunderstandings here: “The Lake District” is the name of a mountainous area (and national park) in England. It’s not the name of a lake or a set of lakes. I realise this is confusing, but that’s just what it’s called.

So (with my limited knowledge of Slovakian) it *would* be appropriate to use the word ‘vrchy’ to refer to the Lake District.
*Martin* (2023-09-13 11:38:47+00:00): According to wikipedia:
- The Lake District, is a mountainous region and national park
- its mountains are sometimes called the Cumbrian Mountains

So form ne these seems to be two different entities.

I understand that The Lake District is a common name that refers the park including mountains and that the term "Cumbrian Mountains", which only refers to the mountains, is rarely used. But still it exists.
*Martin* (2023-09-13 11:49:23+00:00): I also think if name "Cumbrian Mountains" exists, even if it is rare, it should be possible to use it for searching (geocoding) in the map. Feel free to put it to loc_name or so. Same for Slovak name "Kumbrické vrchy" ("vrchy" means hills, but can be used also to refer mounain range).
gscholz (2023-09-09 06:18:55+00:00): Hi ObracBenfica
this changeset has created several errors regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-52.08895&lat=-3.12393&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140986882

This kind o error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
FraserKp (2023-09-11 13:02:10+00:00): new building geometries look a bit wonky - would suggest you use the orthoganalize tool in JOSM (ID has an equivalent) to tidy these up - it will turn all angles into right angles which I assume is correct here
damianeue (2023-09-08 17:23:34+00:00): offset is -0.32; -2.85, mistakenly approved the changeset while editing the description
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 04:54:02+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146014524
emersonveenstra (2023-09-09 14:06:33+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your edits, however please be careful in the future, you accidentally deleted part of bridge street from the map!