piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jcarlson (2024-02-26 22:33:19+00:00): that page is a draft that i started in 2021. it's not intended to be prescriptive (not yet, anyway), but was an attempt at starting some discussion with the local mapping community to build consensus on a statewide standard.

the discussions never really took off, sadly. the framework of the page and class descriptions were copied from existing pages as a starting point. what little discussion has happened since then has been in favor of moving towards a "functional importance" trunk classification, rather than a "physical characteristics" one. for motorway characteristics, we have `expressway=yes`.

i'm not necessarily saying you're wrong. 47 doesn't always feel very "trunky" in every spot, but it does connect a couple of motorways and serves a massive amount of traffic. relative to the surrounding area, it has a much higher functional importance than other primary roads.

by all means, share your opinion on the wiki talk page, on the OSMUS Slack, or on the OSM Community boards. i would love to move closer to a real consensus of local mappers.
nickvet419 (2024-02-26 22:53:20+00:00): got a link to there discussions?
nickvet419 (2024-02-26 23:00:49+00:00): Primary were set as State and US routes and some main roads in urban areas as they already connect town centers across the state. Some would be upgraded as Trunk if they were built as high speed expressways but with some at grade intersection.  If they were based on connectivity, then every US and state route would be a trunk.
jcarlson (2024-02-26 23:30:20+00:00): some you can see on the talk page of the wiki itself:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Illinois/Highway_Classification

for OSMUS Slack, you can sign up here: https://osmus.slack.com/
nickvet419 (2024-02-26 23:49:14+00:00): so no separate discussion on slack for IL tagging?
jcarlson (2024-02-26 23:49:54+00:00): not necessarily. you can't just apply a single policy to every road, you have to consider their context in the nearby highway network.

near Oswego, for instance, you have two state routes (IL 31 and IL 25) on opposite sides of the river. when you compare how they connect to other roads and their annual average daily traffic numbers, IL 31 is more important to the region than IL 25. and just west of there, Orchard Road (a county route) has far greater traffic and connectivity than either.

following the model of other states, part of the classification effort is to identify "major population centers", not just town centers in general. not every town in the state would be important enough to warrant including in the motorway/trunk network.
jcarlson (2024-02-26 23:53:17+00:00): there's a "highway-classification" channel on there where these kinds of discussions take place
Meagan B (2024-02-27 14:48:30+00:00): Route 47 is absolutely a trunk. It is the connecting piece between 88, 80, and 56, completing the network. It has divided carriageways, limited access, and supports high speeds. It's hardly different than Kingery which legally has a lower speed limit than 47 in most areas.
nickvet419 (2024-02-28 00:18:53+00:00): only some sections meet some criteria of trunk. but it is mainly a primary route. also do class roads based on traffic volume.
Meagan B (2024-02-28 01:31:03+00:00): This particular section of 47 from 88 to 80 completely meets the criteria for a Trunk according to the 2021 Highway Classification Guidance: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance#Trunk
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:33:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:33:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:33:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
BEV Austria Community Account (2024-02-17 21:26:02+00:00): Danke, dass du die Interessen der Österreichischen Craftmapper gegen die Geographen Mafia und kommerzielle Interessen deutscher Firmen verteidigst.
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
felipeeugenio (2024-02-23 12:31:38+00:00): Hello Toni, Is this a journey you are keeping on your phone while passing through Argentina? because you are actually editing on a world wide map adding "lavabos" like attractions

could you please explain?
regards
Tomas Straupis (2024-02-15 06:59:07+00:00): O čia tikrai reikėjo detaliau klasifikuotus pastatus keisti į bendrą nieko nesakantį „yes“?
JUVAI (2024-02-15 07:02:49+00:00): galėsiu atkeisti atgal.
Nes rekomendacijos, kaip tag skirti, vienur prieštarauja kitoms
JUVAI (2024-02-15 07:15:45+00:00): pakeista.
Tai gal tuomet reikia, daugiau building=yes paversti į detalesnius tag'us?
Tomas Straupis (2024-02-15 07:19:55+00:00): Na kaip, kol kas realiai nėra naudojamas bent jau Lietuvoje tas žymėjimas. Turiu minčių jį panaudoti pastatų generalizacijoje, bet dar neradau laiko. Tai nežinau, kiek verta laiką gaišti kažkam, kas dar nėra naudojama.
JUVAI (2024-02-15 08:07:22+00:00): Man visai patinka padėti daryti tokius dalykus, tai tikrai galėčiau prisidėti, jei galėčiau būti kažkuo naudingas, aišku, reikia dar įgauti patirties. Tame tikrai matau naudą, nes kuo toliau pradedu daugiau naudoti OSM, ten matau neatitikimus, kuriuos visuomet pasižymiu ir stengiuosi pataisyti.

Tad tikrai galiu padėti. O kaip kitose šalyse atsispindi pastatų tipai?
Tomas Straupis (2024-02-15 08:14:21+00:00): Tai džiugu girdėti, kad norisi padėti. Jei žiūrėti į tai, kaip tiesiog laisvalaikio praleidimą - tada pats indėlis kaip ir mažiau svarbus. Jei žiūrėti į atnešamą naudą - tada vis tiek siūlyčiau atsižvelgti į tai, ką pats labiausiai naudoti iš OSM ir tuos dalykus pildyti, tikrinti.
Eberth (2024-02-15 15:10:23+00:00): Hallo Pajopath,

Du hast bei einigen Straßen die Fahrspuren in OSM getrennt, obwohl in der Realität keine bauliche Trennung vorhanden ist. Das ist meines Erachtens so falsch und müsste über lanes-Tags bzw. turn:lanes-Tags gelöst werden (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Fahrspuren)
Oder gibt es da neue Richtlinien, die ich nicht kenne?

Viele Grüße
Thomas
Pajopath (2024-02-15 15:17:02+00:00): Das ist ein Graubereich an der Stelle, die einen sehen es falsch, die anderen als Richtig an, jenachdem wen man auch im Forum fragt. :-)

 die bauliche Trennung ist in diesem Fall die "mehrfache Sperrfläche" in größerer Stückzahl und länge, wodurch ein Split der Verkehrsadern für ein korrektes Positionieren gerade beim Zubringer besser ist als eine einfache Linie. Bei einfachen Abbiegeflächen lasse ich auch weiterhin die einzellinie bestehen. bei gößeren Kreuzungsbereichen wie hier zwischen der L312 und L327 über mehrere 100m ist das einfach sauberer, auch beim abbiegen und GPS positionieren mit Fahrrad und co.
Pajopath (2024-02-15 15:18:30+00:00): gerade mit dem Wahn der vor ein paar monaten gestartet ist, überall die Spurtrenner (inseln) als split aufzutrennen ist das routing mit aktuellen Geräten und gutem GPS ein kraus, weil das Gerät gerne dann mal falsch positioniert aufgrund der ungenauen Spurlage.
silversurfer83 (2024-02-15 09:47:23+00:00): Gude und willkommen in Korbach :)

ich möchte noch einmal an
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
erinnern. Bitte auch bei "kleinen" Änderungen. Danke.

Grüße
silversurfer83
aTarom (2024-02-15 08:10:26+00:00): Hola, se ha desplazado el nodo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/633166723/history
por error?
ahora no coincide el valor de elevación, me dices algo por favor
Saludos
MarcoR (2024-11-09 14:42:46+00:00): La fermata https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9446000913 si chiama IX Febbraio o XI Febbraio come la strada?
TheDutchMan13 (2024-02-18 18:08:34+00:00): Reverted by me https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147619833
archie (2024-02-15 00:14:43+00:00): Du har ett flertal gånger taggat vägar med foot=no. Detta tagg anger huruvida det finns ett legalt förbud att använda vägen inte om det är lämpligt eller inte. Du verkar inte hålla med om detta.
Du kan läsa mer om detta i osm wiki. Dessutom kan du kolla in följande foruminlägg:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/unodvendige-tags/95753

"En annen vanlig feil er å tenke at access-taggene angir om veien er egnet for f.eks. sykkel, men access-taggene angir bare om det er lovlig eller ikke (f.eks. om det er skiltet som forbudt å sykle der)."

Eftersom du upprepade gånger har taggat samma vägar på detta felaktiga sätt utan att du bemött invändningarna mot din taggning, kommer jag att rapportera detta till DWG.
archie (2024-02-15 00:49:01+00:00): Ett tillägg bara. Om du fortfarande är i tvivel om hur foot=no taggen användes på rätt sätt, kan du börja fundera över kommentaren som din edit-app lägger till vid dessa ändringar "Specify whether roads are prohibited for pedestrians".
Märk väl "prohibited" inte "not suitable"! Av detta borde du för länge sedan ha dragit rätt slutsats.
Och för att mota Olle i grind; "prohibited" - dvs i det här fallet gångförbud på vägar - är det endast väghållaren som kan bestämma, inte mapparen Batistacavera.
Warin61 (2024-02-16 00:05:50+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM! 

This changeset removed some 'wetland' areas sourced for the DCS Base Map. They may be better tagged as 'intermittent=yes' ... possibly only 'wet' during floods? What do you think? Past mappers may probably only be using the data from that Base Map thus missing the 'only during floods' aspect?
Macca70 (2024-02-16 00:22:12+00:00): Hi Warin61, thanks for the welcome.

The edits were based on a recent flood event, second biggest on record, the areas removed were not impacted by flood waters and remained dry. I will keep the option for tagging as intermittent in mind for other edits thanks.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-03 11:38:44+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=regional;²
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11624865352/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=regional
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
BCNorwich (2024-05-30 07:43:04+00:00): Hi, Is the tertiary highway Waterlow (26209882), really changed to a highway under construction?

Regards Bernard.
Ewen Hill (2024-03-01 09:11:48+00:00): Hi, this should be set to intermittent as you can clearly see ground on bing for the entire area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147469794
Ewen Hill (2024-03-01 09:10:21+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM - This a appears to be a private road Inside a controlled airport space and the road should be set to access=no, if you could do this please.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147470029
DD1GJ (2024-02-15 07:11:21+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM. Ist das Verbot für Busse offiziell ausgeschildert oder nur eine persönliche Einschätzung?
TheDutchMan13 (2024-02-18 18:21:51+00:00): Reverted by me https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147620346#map=5/38.308/-101.828
pantufla (2024-02-18 20:53:28+00:00): Hey, I see you've changed the name of the place. The reason the subtag Theatre was added is because there is a POI representing the theather and another one representing the cinema, since there is no tagging to represent both in one. Do you think it's better this way? What are the pros and cons?
VLD522 (2024-03-05 13:33:58+00:00): Hi Pantufla,
Thank you for your comment. I understand your point, but the place itself is called 'Trasnocho Cultural'. I think there's no need to create two different points. The description already indicates that it's a cultural place with cinemas, and theatres, among others.
TheDutchMan13 (2024-02-18 18:09:55+00:00): Reverted by me https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147619833
TheDutchMan13 (2024-02-18 18:15:01+00:00): Reverted by me https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147620094#map=6/17.319/-94.757
dzidek23 (2024-02-15 09:17:56+00:00): Hi mtjp, thank you for contributing. 

Please remember and try to make the buildings square. You can use "Q" on the keyboard to straighten areas and lines.

Keep up the good work :)
woodpeck (2024-02-16 08:57:04+00:00): Dear user Zemlemer-Geodesist, please specify your source more precisely than just "imagery". The standard aerial imagery layers avaialable to OSM do not seem to support your very detailed drawing of woodland. Also note that natural=wood is to be used for actual forests, not small groups of trees in a public park!

Your quirky changeset comments are misleading; "traced woods in garden square on Raumskaya street" is sufficient.
TrickyFoxy (2024-02-16 14:01:44+00:00): > Also note that natural=wood is to be used for actual forests, not small groups of trees in a public park!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:natural%3Dwood

> На территории России в результате обсуждения и последующего голосования принято, что этим тегом обозначается любая территория с лесной растительностью.
Zemlemer-Geodesist (2024-02-16 14:47:56+00:00): this is an approximate interpolation from ESRI layer. in the summer-autumn period I’m going to adjust it according to surveying.

i relied on the accepted practice of using the natural=wood tag in the russian community.
literan (2024-02-24 11:26:32+00:00): здание нарисовано тяп-ляп, поверх забора. Это вандализм
literan (2024-02-24 11:26:02+00:00): это детская площадка, а не здание. Вы вносите в карту выдуманные, фейковые объекты
literan (2024-02-24 11:23:16+00:00): отрисовано тяп-ляп, сломана дорога, здание поверх нее. Откат
literan (2024-02-24 11:22:31+00:00): не надо отрисовывать снесенные здания
literan (2024-02-24 11:19:29+00:00): вы отрисовали здание поверх дороги, не надо так делать
Vonter (2024-02-15 03:28:05+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Congrats on your first contributions to OpenStreetMap! If you’re interested in connecting with other mappers, do consider joining the regional OSM groups:

OSM Bengaluru

Telegram: https://telegram.me/OSM_BLR

Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#OSM_BLR:matrix.org

OSM India

Telegram: https://telegram.me/OSMIndia

Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#osm-in-general:matrix.org

Happy Mapping!
tastrax (2024-03-29 04:58:43+00:00): Just a heads up - the correct key for telephone numbers is 'phone' not telephone
Tommybara (2025-06-07 19:48:41+00:00): Đô với chả thị gì nữa? Sắp tới thành xã hết trơn rồi. Mà tên Lai Vung sẽ được trả về đúng vị trí Tân Thành bây giờ, đúng ý bạn Duong Dang Khoi/Người Miền Nam quá rồi.
i2004 (2024-02-15 17:11:05+00:00): es definitvo el cambio?
AgusQui (2024-02-15 17:46:15+00:00): No sé, hay que revisar más adelante
i2004 (2024-02-15 10:34:21+00:00): no etiendo que cambios hiciste
AgusQui (2024-02-15 13:05:03+00:00): Había paradas desordenadas
adiatmad (2024-02-27 06:19:05+00:00): Hi, just seeking clarification. What does the layer=* tag signify on the highway?

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1232185073
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-02-27 14:40:00+00:00): I apologize for the mistake. I have rectified it
Matt_ (2024-02-15 04:30:21+00:00): Wrong comment, just connecting two streams
user_11609320 (2024-02-15 04:36:32+00:00): had trouble trying to adjust it because i am using a tablet
olo81 (2024-02-16 13:24:46+00:00): co to jest? nianie powielamy obiektów które już są naniesione
nevw (2024-02-17 12:02:05+00:00): Hi, osmi found a self intersection error here
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.74031&lat=-16.91319&zoom=19
nevw (2024-02-18 03:30:20+00:00): This is now fixed
Soshal Distan Singh (2024-02-15 05:48:05+00:00): Добрый день.

>Переулок Молодежный
>ЦЕНТРАЛЬНАЯ УЛИЦА

Поправил.

Пожалуйста ознакомьтесь:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия
Geo_Cop (2024-05-03 04:32:54+00:00): Hi Ky_AT, Please note: changesets should be local to avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province).
Allison P (2024-02-15 06:29:36+00:00): Some of your tags were improperly formatted (like opening hours and phone number). I fixed these. Your change also moved a lot of nodes around, putting businesses and addresses in the wrong locations, moving sidewalks, and even deleting address data. Please be more careful.
ljc_jlyb (2024-02-15 05:59:33+00:00): 不小心按了上传
原comment应为添加建筑物
basilisk (2024-02-25 12:12:03+00:00): Приветствую!

Это здание почему-то на востоке оказалось, проверьте пожалуйста:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1250676368#map=18/52.10876/23.76712
pooh79 (2024-07-17 08:28:16+00:00): строящееся здание с адресом "Грибоедова, 2" в районе Луцкой.
явно какая-то ошибка
TrickyFoxy (2024-02-23 20:11:30+00:00): Это не значит что дорогу нужно совсем удалять
adiban3 (2024-02-15 09:31:28+00:00): There is indeed no traffic sign. But the nodes are simply inaccessible by foot. How do I map that?
Metzor (2024-02-15 11:24:08+00:00): Hi adiban,

I don't know if you have read my comment in your changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147291115

There, I wrote:
2. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Afoot%3Duse_sidepath
Might be the correct way to map what you want (but not on node!)

Does this answer your question?

Cheers
Metzor
aceman444 (2024-02-20 22:58:06+00:00): Sadly, it looks like everything you have done here is made wrongly. You do not put type=restriction on a way. You said it is forbidded not turn right, but you did not tag any 'right' anywhere. Also, there already existed restrictions to turn right or left (only_straight_on), so nothing needed to be done there. You also added turn lanes, but used 'turn' instead of 'turn:lanes' when multiple lanes exist. Also you added 3 lanes of "throught|through|through|" (which are actually 4, one without any markings on the right) to roads that have 3 or even 2 lanes. Also, you should add 'turn' tags only if the markings on the road (arrows) exist. If does not mark any restrictions on turning in OSM, the type=restriction relations do that.
jbcharron (2024-02-16 19:55:04+00:00): Bienvenue sur OSM :)
Pour ton information, la ville et le code postal ne sont pas nécessaire d'être renseigné. On est capable de le déterminer automatiquement.
Bonne soirée
aTarom (2024-02-16 14:36:31+00:00): Hola, bienvenido, para indicar la tienda de alimentación en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11626091276/history
mira la wiki de
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:shop%3Dconvenience
hay que buscar tags estándar ya que con
"Tienda"="Alimentacion"
no lo van a entender las apps ni el renderizado
si quieres solucionar cualquier duda por favor únete a los grupos de la comunidad en
https://t.me/OSMes
ó
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51
Saludos
Rewinteer (2024-02-18 16:02:04+00:00): Здравствуйте! 
Удалил добавленный вами name тег со здания (changeset 147615160), т.к. это название парка, а не конкретного строения (см. обсуждение https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147477901)
☆Finvenkulo (2024-02-18 11:37:36+00:00): Główna nazwa (klucz «name») powinna być w lokalnym języku. Lokalnym językiem kontynentu Europa jest np. język polski, niemiecki, ukraiński. Więc nazwa powinna być w tych językach.
Rewinteer (2024-02-18 15:54:30+00:00): Здравствуйте! 
Заревертил этот пакет правок в  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147614764 т.к. в этом пакете добавлены несуществующие объекты . building=* теги используются для зданий/построек. Здания такого размера нет в том месте, где вы его добавили, насколько я могу видеть. Если правки были сделаны с целью отобразить название парка на рендере - название уже нанесено на https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455544676 landuse полигон, который и обозначает контур парка. Если название landuse по какой-то причине не отображается - проблема, вероятнее всего, в рендерере
sanchi (2024-02-18 14:52:58+00:00): Hola.
Por favor no borres etiquetado sin tener en cuenta la wiki.
Surface es correcto que exista y los has borrado. Y natural era cambiarlo por landuse, no borrarlo
Como indica en la wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Features_within_a_golf_course
Pasa lo mismo en el conjunto de cambios 147478324 al cual además has borrado cosas que no son en un campo de golf.
Además, por favor por una descripción de lo que realizas. "golf" no dice nada
Un saludo
geozeisig (2024-02-19 06:43:35+00:00): To use landuse or natural at elements of the golf course is not desired. You have read the Wiki page Tag:leisure=golf_course. I had previously also used this for surface=grass because it is the standard for golf=green. Only in cases where it deviates from this would it make sense.

Best regards
sanchi (2024-02-20 22:24:50+00:00): Indica que se use surface. "Avoid using landuse=* or natural=* tags to indicate its surface, use surface=* instead."
Los surface los has borrado. A parte también en alguna geometría que no era del campo de golf.

Un saludo.
geozeisig (2024-02-21 06:28:25+00:00): I just wanted to revise the dataset, but you already did it. 

Many greetings
theophrastos (2024-02-15 07:59:07+00:00): Sollte "Baunach Neubaugebiet" sein
literan (2024-02-24 11:12:20+00:00): не надо отрисовывать уже снесенные здания
mueschel (2024-02-15 10:44:17+00:00): Hi,
it seems something went wrong here. The objects have many foreign tags that don't seem to belong to OSM, e.g.

    OBJECTID = 896740
    acres = 8.33526582
    attribute = PUBH
    circ39_cla = 5
    cow_class1 = UB
    hgm_code = TEPDVR
    hgm_desc = Terrene Pond Vertical
    hgm_symbol = Depression
    spcc_desc = Non-Vegetated Aquatic Community
    wetland_ty = Freshwater Pond

The changeset is also missing the link to the required documentation of the import.
osmviborg (2024-02-15 08:06:09+00:00): Hej. I Danske Stednavne hedder ejendommen Topografgården: https://vis.dataforsyningen.dk/stednavne2/19e4392f-dca6-5d41-e053-d380220a2006/Topografg%C3%A5rden
osmviborg (2024-02-15 08:10:56+00:00): Hvis navnet skal ændres kan du gøre det her: https://sdfi.dk/vores-opgaver/dataindsamling/indberetning
DaanT (2024-02-15 08:08:13+00:00): "Geen bushalte aan de noordkant van de kerk. " had niet in de comment moeten staan.
Hb- (2024-12-10 10:14:51+00:00): Fehlerhaftes Ergebnis dieser Änderungen war die doppelte Anschrift Bundesstraße 13 in Lenne für die Gebäude w488257641 neben der korrekten bei Gebäude w488258763. Korrigiert mit #160114252.
sirorezka (2024-02-15 14:56:53+00:00): спасибо
Syl (2024-02-15 10:10:12+00:00): Bonjour, vous ne pouvez pas exiger que le lieu-dit ne soit pas déplacé. Le positionnement d'un lieu-dit se fait au milieu de la zone.
Dans la doc : "mettre l'attribut place=* approximativement au centre du lieu"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Lieux

Ce qui pourrais être mis à cette endroit c'est un numéro. Mais comme il vous l'a déjà été dis à plusieurs reprises, s'il n'y en a pas c'est à de voir avec votre mairie. OSM ne peut pas résoudre ce problème d'absence d'adresse.
Tommybara (2024-03-25 00:31:31+00:00): Can you provide a source that indicate that "Anh Na" is this mountain's name? Otherwise this is very apparent that this is vandalism.
kilgor (2024-03-25 01:14:03+00:00): https://peakvisor.com/peak/anh-na.html