piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2025-07-01 12:06:28+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
However,
The round buildings you have mapped are not drawn in according to the guidelines.
Check this footage how to map (round) buildings
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1YJV6I_rhY
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167543138
Gregory Peony (2025-07-27 00:34:30+00:00): The middle footprint you mapped here is fairly accurate and has been appropriately squared, though it is actually G shaped. See how I mapped these at https://osmcha.org/changesets/169533536 Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167543233
Supaplex030 (2025-06-13 11:32:22+00:00): Hey, jetzt habe ich verstanden was du mit den "doppelten" Stellflächen für Parkbuchten und Ladezonen meinst :) Das ist ja auch eine ungewöhnliche Beschilderung...

Die Verwendung der Ladezonen-Flächen auf der Fahrbahn erscheint mir allerdings sehr ungünstig, insbesondere, da die "Parkflächen" nicht (z.B. durch Markierungen) auf der Fahrbahn erkennbar sind.

Andersherum lässt es sich mMn aber gut lösen: Die Parkbuchten als separate Flächen erfassen und an der Straßenlinie dann die Ladezonen. Ich habe das mal hier umgesetzt und dabei noch ein paar weitere Verbesserungen vorgenommen: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167570946

z.B. hab ich noch ein paar ausgeschilderte Halteverbote mit parking:*:restriction=no_stopping spezifiziert sowie die obstacle:parking-Tags wieder entfernt, da sie mit separaten Flächen ja nicht benötigt werden.

(Betrifft Caroline-Michaelis-Straße und Julie-Wolfthorn-Straße.)
dieterdreist (2025-11-11 14:06:54+00:00): danke
fmc_1 (2025-11-11 14:07:39+00:00): danke
Jordi MF (2025-06-14 14:51:31+00:00): Hola Pau,

He vist que has modificat un tram d'una carretera com si fóra d'un únic sentit (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288994441), però en l'ortofoto es veu que és de doble sentit. Ho he tornat a posar com a bidireccional perquè sospite que és un error, però si hi ha hagut alguna modificació recent que no es veu a l'ortofoto, agrairíem que ho explicares per a que sapiguem que la nova edició no es pot revisar amb l'ortofoto de l'editor.

Salutacions!
Pau77 (2025-06-14 17:34:28+00:00): Hola Jordi,
Ben vist, efectivament, va ser un error. 
Gràcies!
P
Srdjan023 (2025-06-12 17:44:56+00:00): *rupu
Glassman (2025-06-13 23:13:57+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

It appears you duplicated the costco store outline and added a river next to the existing stream linestring.  These have been fixed.

You also added a poiygon that is tagged as a physiotherapist. Should that also be tagged as a building? Can you finish up this polygon?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167544549
Gregory Peony (2025-07-26 21:47:18+00:00): HI you are generally identifying buildings in the imagery but please do not tag individual buildings as residential areas. Instead use the tag building=yes for building footprints.

Please do not snap the corners of the buildings to other buildings or features such as roads and paths. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to keep nodes from snapping to other objects and accidentally connecting. This [video about connected nodes](https://youtu.be/ltn1VOiq5_0) has more information and a guide.
Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167544668
infeeeee (2025-06-13 11:17:18+00:00): Szia!

Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Végignéztem a szerkesztéseid, nagyrészt jók, de vannak benne hibák, amiket itt írok nem feltétlenül csak erre a szerkesztésedre vonatkoznak.

Töltsd ki a "changeset comment" mezőt feltöltés előtt! Adj valami rövid leírást, összefoglalást: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Sokan vagyunk, akik ellenőrizzük mások változtatásait, a mi munkánkat nagyon megkönnyítenéd ezzel.

Illetve ez azért is fontos, mert minden elemnél vissza lehet nézni, hogy ki, mikor, mit csinált vele. Persze össze lehet hasonlítani, hogy milyen adatok változtak, de ezt jelentősen megkönnyíted ha összefoglalod a változtatásaidat.

Nem kell túlgondolni, pár szó, pl. "Csillagvizsgáló javítások" vagy "Autószerelő hozzáadása", stb

Dolgoknak a neve az csak a név, nem leírás. Amit lehet címkékkel jelölni, azt címkékkel jelöljük, ha nem lehet címkékkel az a description mezőbe kerülhet. Név az ahogy hívnak egy dolgot nem köznévvel, esetleg ha rá van írva nagy betűkkel.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12909497369

Ebben a módosításcsomagban szereplő napórán se a name, se a description nem kell, azt, hogy aluminiumból van a material=aluminium címkékkel kell megadni.

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség#Elérhetőségek

További jó térképezést!
Kulizoli (2025-06-13 15:24:11+00:00): Oké, nagyon köszi!
infeeeee (2025-06-16 15:14:25+00:00): De fogod ezeket javítani a közeljövőben, vagy javítsam én?
Kulizoli (2025-06-16 16:02:08+00:00): Elnézést, nem volt időm érdemben azóta, igyekszem mindet javítani.
infeeeee (2025-06-16 17:40:48+00:00): Ok, nem sürgős, csak ne felejtődjenek így. Sajnos sok szerkesztő van aki az első próbálkozás után feladja.
Glassman (2025-06-13 23:17:11+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

You added a duplicate building. Please delete the duplicate building and just leave the node you added in a subsequent edit. Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167544823
infeeeee (2025-06-13 11:45:04+00:00): Szia!

Name címke itt felesleges, ez az infó a többi címkéből következik.

További jó térképezést!
bartgron (2025-06-15 23:14:07+00:00): Witaj!
Latarnie dodaje się:
1. Nie do drogi tylko obok (w miejscu ich faktycznego położenia)
2. Nie w ten sposób (zamiast nazwy trzeba dać tag highway=street_lamp).
Proszę o poprawę, w przeciwnym razie "latarnie" zostaną usunięte.
Glassman (2025-06-13 23:16:21+00:00): This node is better than the duplicate building you added in your first edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167545591
eigenval (2025-06-13 21:49:09+00:00): Kilka uwag do tych zmian:
1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1394799522 przylega do istniejącego obszaru lasu. Lepiej było zmodyfikować https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161182731 tak, żeby obejmował zaznaczony obszar.
2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1394799518: tag `name` jest używany do nazw własnych, "droga do domu" takową raczej nie jest.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167545665
Glassman (2025-06-13 23:14:37+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167545886
eigenval (2025-06-13 21:32:54+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Dodana droga już wcześniej istniała, nie ma potrzeby dodawać nowej. Jeśli coś jest nie tak z istniejącą, można ją zmienić. Pisz jeśli coś jest niejasne lub potrzebujesz pomocy.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167546068
bartgron (2025-06-13 21:46:07+00:00): Do tego nie daje się nazwy "droga do domu" chyba że jest to faktyczna nazwa drogi chociaż myślę że nie jest to nazwa
Lyon-St-Clair (2025-06-30 21:48:55+00:00): can you check notes before adding back demolished buildings please?
keyyushi (2025-06-27 21:46:59+00:00): Hello, what is the source of the edits you made in Turkey? (Especially the edits related to road smoothness.)
Bat Sande (2025-06-28 06:55:39+00:00): I use Street Complete on site or satellite photos, mainly introducing the smoothness of the coating into large parking lots. Have I been wrong?
keyyushi (2025-06-28 09:16:22+00:00): It is very difficult to understand road smoothness with satellite imagery. Please do not add the road smoothness label where you are not sure. 

Also avoid creating large changesets. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
aceman444 (2026-04-12 11:51:15+00:00): Also please do not make changes in such a large area across multiple countries.
FUZZY_42 (2025-07-05 16:48:51+00:00): Where did you get the information that Yangi Uzbekistan Street is closed?
BroharrisCanal (2025-07-09 15:57:00+00:00): Hello, Apple has an agreement with Maxar to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which is not publicly available for editing OpenStreetMap. We generally use the imagery that is already available in JOSM but where we do use that more recent imagery, we always cite it and the date the imagery is from in the changeset source. Hope that answers your question.
ANDREW_K_IN_MA (2025-08-17 22:15:04+00:00): I am the owner of the property and do not want the trail on the map. It ends up on hiking maps and then I have to explain to people it is not public.
Thanks - had this discussion last time as well.
MassCartog (2025-08-18 14:27:57+00:00): Hello, Please read the comment in your changeset here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170588620
Vodevil_Mark (2026-06-30 18:30:42+00:00): Тут же нету велодорожки
hatul (2025-06-12 20:57:36+00:00): שלום ar
בעריכה של רחוב אלקלעי בטעות פיצלת את היחס של שביל השרון.
פעם הבאה בבקשה להיזהר.
תודה
dzamper (2026-05-31 13:38:51+00:00): Nie rozdzielamy dróg dla pieszych i rowerów na dwie linie, jeśli nie są oddzielone od siebie jakąkolwiek fizyczną przeszkodą
Dino Michelini (2025-06-27 09:03:47+00:00): per la mappatura di guidepost vedi la wiki di OSM
Dino Michelini (2025-06-27 09:20:53+00:00): landuse=grass si utilizza "for a smaller areas of mown and managed grass for example in the middle of a roundabout, verges beside a road or in the middle of a dual carriageway." (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass)
monotar (2025-06-21 13:49:35+00:00): Hallo Andreas,

Wie du vielleicht mitbekommen hast, ist der Wald im Mapnik-Render beschädigt und ich vermute, dass das mit der Fläche Schwarzer Teich zusammenhängt. Ich wollte das hier reparieren, aber frage mich wie ich hier verfahren soll, auf allen Karten kann ich die Eintragung des Schwarzen Teich hier nämlich nicht nachvollziehen und dadurch auch nicht reparieren. 

Ist das hier ein ehemaliges Naturschutgebiet bzw. gibt es den Teich überhaupt noch? Dann wäre das nichts für OSM, denn wir bilden keine geschichtlichen Landschaften ab.

Grüße
Frans S (2025-06-24 15:00:34+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
A remark, You tend to oversize the buildings you map. Stay within the rooflines. These huts have an overhang.
Best regards
infeeeee (2025-06-13 12:06:23+00:00): Szia!

Amiket a másik strandos szerkesztésedhez írtam, itt is relevánsak. 

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség#Elérhetőségek

További jó térképezést!
infeeeee (2025-06-13 11:40:09+00:00): Szia!

Ne a name címkébe tárolj ilyen leírásokat. A játszótérnél ez a name egyszerűen elhagyható, nem tartalmaz semmi információt.

A büfénél amenity=fast_food címkével jelölheted, hogy itt ételt lehet venni.

A WC-re amenity=toilets címke kell, shower=yes címkével jelölheted, hogy zuhanyzó is van. Vagy ha külön jelölnéd, akkor amenity=shower

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shower

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dshower

Ha ezek a dolgok csak belépőjeggyel érhetőek el, akkor egy access=customers-t rakhatsz mindegyikre.

A recepciókat amenity=reception_desk címkékkel szokták jelölni: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dreception_desk

De ha ez a strand bejárata és itt kell jegyet venni a bejutáshoz, akkor a shop=ticket jobban illhet rá, más strandokon is így van ez jelölve: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dticket

Épületek rajzolásánál Go Map-ban, a More... gomb alatt találod a "Make rectangular" opciód, ezzel szabályosabbá teheted az általad rajzolt épületeket.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Go_Map!!/Map_Editor_Interface#More…

További jó térképezést!
silversurfer83 (2025-06-12 21:29:56+00:00): Hi :)

einfach nur "access=private" ist vollkommen ausreichend, da dies alle Werte kombiniert. Sollte einer abweichen, kann dieser gesondert erfasst werden.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167549448
yrtimiD (2025-06-13 22:44:45+00:00): Hi and welcome! Thanks for your contribution! Yes, your tagging is correct. I'd only add "junction=roundabout" to the circle road, and also it's better to join small road chunks to be one way (two oneway roads connected to the roundabout)

ping me if you need help with fixing them
dieterdreist (2025-06-16 09:42:21+00:00): grazie per aver agito sulla questione, però non avresti dovuto cancellare il bagno del cafè, se esiste. Il modo più corretto è indicare che si tratta di un bagno per i clienti, con access=customers. Invece se la posizione del bagno era errata, la risposta giusta è spostarlo al punto giusto. Ti segnalo che ho ripristinato il bagno.
Saluti,
Martin
9r8k (2025-06-16 22:24:50+00:00): Va bene, ho spostato il bagno un po.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167715128

PS: Was für ein lustiger Zufall, dass du ganz "dreist" auf Italienisch geantwortet hast, weil ich Spaß daran habe, Italienisch zu lernen. ;)
dieterdreist (2025-06-17 07:23:17+00:00): Ich habe deshalb auf italienisch geantwortet weil mir nicht klar war dass du deutsch bist/sprichst, so dreist finde ich das nun nicht :) Bist du in Rom oder zu Besuch? Wir haben eine lokale Gruppe von Mappern die sich in der Vergangenheit gelegentlich getroffen hat, vielleicht könnte man das wieder aufleben lassen, hättest du evtl. Interesse?
9r8k (2025-06-19 10:53:33+00:00): Grazie per l'offerta ma sono stato a Roma solo per vacanza e per visitare un'amica chi viene da Roma. In bocca al lupo per la gruppa OSM di Roma! Sarebbe un po' triste se non ci fossero abbastanza persone chi si interessano di OSM in una città così grande.
MassCartog (2025-06-12 23:25:49+00:00): Hello again, please read previous comment here: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167138288

In this change set, you seem to have removed a valid driveway and a valid track that both seem to exist on the ground. If this is not true, you should give more details in your changeset description, and responding to comments. OSM is a community project, when removing data there should be a stated reason/source.
Thierry1030 (2025-06-12 23:02:46+00:00): Dag Eebie, dank voor het mappen van het Kolenspoor en voor de foto's!
Kort vraagje hier nog over: is dit stuk fietssnelweg al bewegwijzerd? als dat nog niet het geval zou zijn moet aan de relatie terug state=proposed toegevoegd worden
https://mapcomplete.org/cycle_highways.html?z=12.2&lat=51.014644641740176&lon=5.569243689709538#relation/11010540
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-15 05:26:33+00:00): DWG revert at User's request

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167636158
Lezurex (2025-06-13 06:35:20+00:00): Was hat access=no hier genau zu bedeuten?
stillhart (2025-06-13 17:43:33+00:00): Keine Ahnung wie das passiert ist. wird korrigiert
MarinoBM (2025-08-21 17:01:21+00:00): Hola Kike TM, no entiendo qué finalidad tienen las dos rutas que has llamado "DELETE ME"

Un saludo.
KikeTM (2025-08-21 17:31:00+00:00): Hola Marino,

como se indica, son para eliminar. La actualizacion de la L12 con los servicios de este año la realice con un editor que no permitía borrar relaciones.

Saludos!
MarinoBM (2025-08-21 19:36:11+00:00): Gracias por contestar.

Eliminadas.

Un saludo.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-06-12 21:00:48+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12911386542

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-15 06:10:01+00:00): DWG revert at User's request

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167637082
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-15 06:04:08+00:00): DWG revert at User's request

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167636936
smaprs (2025-07-17 01:19:05+00:00): Oi Lucas. Onde você encontrou a informação de que se trata atualmente de  
boundary=protected_area  
leisure=nature_reserve  ?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-15 06:05:30+00:00): DWG revert at User's request

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167636968
infinatious (2025-06-17 19:12:08+00:00): Thank you this has bugged me for years
Joseph R P (2025-06-17 20:44:51+00:00): Same here haha. It might've just been a relic of expressway-based trunk tagging.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-15 06:07:04+00:00): DWG revert at User's request

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167636996
Im Fokus (2025-07-17 14:28:43+00:00): Hallo limes11, Du warst ja sehr aufmerksam und schnell mit der Korrektur meines Fehleintrags der immer noch nicht (Stand 14.07.25, 4. Jahrestag der Katastrophe) eingesetzten Radwegbrücke. Sorry und danke dafür.
limes11 (2025-07-17 16:20:29+00:00): Ja ich bin da relativ oft und hatte mich gewundert, dass die Brücke schon gerendert wird. 

Ist schon recht weit, lang wird es nicht mehr dauern :)
colorful-corvid (2025-07-06 15:57:52+00:00): I think this is mapping for the renderer. The campsite is pretty scrubby and that is useful information for some people looking to know what to pack for their camping trip. Additionally, only some renderers show conflict between campgrounds and groundcover. This vegetation does extend into the campground and I think the best practice would be for our map data to reflect that.
TuAmigoElEditor (2025-06-12 23:46:54+00:00): Hola. Al añadir el nombre de un objeto al mapa, por favor, escriba el nombre completo y evite usar abreviaturas para términos como Av. C., sino la palabra completa: Avenida, Calle, etc.
Además, trate de usar una gramática correcta: por ejemplo, escriba "Vía Separadora" en lugar de "VIA Separadora".
Saludos
Owlchemist (2025-06-12 23:24:44+00:00): Messed up description. Had to remove shooting range and Black Star Canyon changes due to bounding area issues.
citrula (2025-06-13 03:43:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Please don't map abandoned railways where there is no trace whatsoever (like where it is going through parking lots, buildings, etc and has been completely removed. If you are interested in mapping continuous historical routes like this, I recommend checking out OHM:
https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/

a recent development that you might be interested in is the vector version of OpenRailwayMap, which supports current rail from OSM and historical rail from OHM.
https://github.com/hiddewie/OpenRailwayMap-vector
aharvey (2025-06-13 00:55:11+00:00): it's not considered good practice to use the name tag to describe things see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things

If you want to provide a description to map users it's best to use the description=* tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description

otherwise you can use tags like sac_scale=demanding_mountain_hiking to describe sections you need to use your hands to get through https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sac_scale
aharvey (2025-06-21 12:28:05+00:00): I've updated this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167911590
iandees (2025-06-12 23:43:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is there a reason you removed these residential areas? They are definitely still residential areas here. If it was a mistake I'm happy to undo it for you.
Epidural1114 (2025-06-12 23:55:09+00:00): I removed them since there aren't any other residential areas nearby and it made them stand out. If that's not the right approach please feel free to undo.
iandees (2025-06-12 23:57:32+00:00): Gotcha. There aren't others around probably because no one has bothered to add them yet. Feel free to add more if you'd like.
ottanium (2025-07-03 07:14:23+00:00): Ciao busnotturno95. Ho visto che hai modificato l'incrocio tra via Isonzo e Viale Tommaso Edison seguendo le immagini satellitari. Purtroppo non sono aggiornate e i miei cambiamenti erano basati su una survey di persona. Ti chiederei se possibile di fare un revert di queste modifiche. Grazie ;)
CRCulver (2025-06-15 14:32:31+00:00): Are you sure that this way is surface=asphalt?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109964012

When tagging SoCal from aerial imagery, I specifically used the tag surface=paved when the road surface seemed to differ from nearby asphalt roads, and was therefore possibly surface=concrete.
yelisey90 (2025-06-13 06:35:51+00:00): Is the part of the road covered by the roof underground? If not, it should not be layer=-1, but the roof should rather be layer=1
martien-176 (2025-06-15 13:33:37+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping. 

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Most buildings do have right angled corners and we need our mapping to reflect that. One can get fooled by shadows falling from the neighboring buildings or trees, and think that these form the edge of the building. Resulting in some weird building shapes That is happening here also. Using alternative imagery for a 2nd opinion, eg mapbox, might be helpful. 

Please check out these sources for more info: 
- Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
- Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ 
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT global validator.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167555353
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:38:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168127991 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:53:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
user_5359 (2025-06-16 08:22:19+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dreligious_administration. Also please use (british) English for the keys.
maintained_inthemembrane (2025-06-25 17:56:12+00:00): Neglected to include change explanation (I think):

edited to reflect "informal" nature. not an official USFS trail. unmaintained- possible ecological sensitivity and questionable safety/quality for users.