piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab (2023-01-06 16:25:41+00:00): I have doubts about the existence of this path. The aerial photos don't show any signs of a separate cycleway and it's highly unbelievable for such a long cycleway to be constructed in such a short amount of time.

Could you provide some proof of existance?

https://i.imgur.com/YMEIsda.png

Here the symbolic feature path is connected to real feature landuse, they should be disconnected from each other.

Also the crossings on road intersections are missing.

Cheers!
Jarov (2023-01-07 06:19:28+00:00): Aerial photos are out of date - path was finished end of last year. Here is photo from 20 Stycznia - Podleśna looking towards Generała Stefana "Grota" Roweckiego:
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=645341780330856&set=pcb.645341830330851

Rest of remarks should be fixed in Changeset: 130969813

Cheers!
NorthCrab (2023-01-07 06:22:07+00:00): Thank you
eggie (2023-01-06 16:20:10+00:00): Dag Macel.. Je weg heeft geen verbinding met andere wegen behalve dan een fietspad. highway=crossing hoort daar niet denk ik. 
Hoe is de verbinding met het wegennet?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-01-06 16:21:57+00:00): Situatie november
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=06-01-2022&loc=51.42499%2C4.320524%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2022-11-01&acqid=20221101_110902_SV1-03&sensor=SuperView-1
marcelsmidt (2023-01-06 20:46:30+00:00): Bedankt voor de terugkoppeling Eggie.
Zojuist aangepast met een twee nieuwe mutaties.

Hopelijk zo beter!
Goed weekend alvast
eggie (2023-01-06 21:10:41+00:00): Dag Marcel.. Nu lijkt het in ieder geval op de pdok luchtfoto. 
Aan de westzijde zie ik ook paden en aan de zuidkant is dat niet een ingang naar een parkeergarage? 
Groet
eggie
marcelsmidt (2023-01-06 21:21:37+00:00): Klopt, er is nog tenminste 1 ingang naar de garagekelder en er lopen nog een aantal voetpaden. Zal ze morgen verder intekenen.
eggie (2023-01-06 21:24:02+00:00): Oei... kon het niet laten... Heb al wat ingetekend, maar nog genoeg te doen hier.
Even ctrl-f5 voor het effect.
Gr eggie
marcelsmidt (2023-01-06 21:28:05+00:00): Super, ziet er al een héél stuk beter uit!
Gaaf!
Palolo (2023-01-06 15:50:53+00:00): Thank you for making square corners on the buildings. Please trace each building accurately rather than generalizing. You can save your edits for several buildings rather than after each edit.
danieldegroot2 (2024-03-11 10:37:43+00:00): Hey Brian,

I found a possible duplicate
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10311223366
of an existing AED
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10311223364

They have similar location but different opening hours. They were added at the same time.
Could you check it is a duplicate? If not, whether the location I have chosen is okay? You can remove the fixme, or remove the duplicate.

Regards,

Daniel
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:18:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:18:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
pacman541 (2023-01-09 07:56:41+00:00): откуда инфа, что Нововолжский мост это Новый Волжский мост?
Friendly_Ghost (2023-01-07 18:37:02+00:00): Dankjewel voor de update
martinst (2023-01-06 18:07:21+00:00): Anmerkungen etc. können bei note=* oder description=* eingetragen werden. name=* wird nur für Eigennamen verwendent. Bitte korrigieren.
vasony (2023-01-23 19:15:08+00:00): Görgey útról van határozatod?
ssummoner1 (2023-01-24 10:16:17+00:00): Görgey Artúr utca? Görgey út szerepel az utcatáblán.

Zrínyi Ilona utca? Szintén Zrínyi út szerepel a táblán.

A Zrínyi úton volt egy melónk januárban elsőkörben rossz helyen fordúltunk le Görgey úton és ahogy néztem a GPS-t láttam, hogy sehogy nem jön ki a tábla és az OSM szereplő név.

Nekem kell határozatot előszedni most?
vasony (2023-01-24 10:29:04+00:00): nem kell, ha a táblán ez volt.
az old_name miatt hittem hogy megváltozott. 
Ezek szerint csak simán rosszul szerepelt, ekkor viszont az old_name felesleges
ssummoner1 (2023-01-24 10:30:23+00:00): A gép tulajdonosa erre a címre hívott ki bennünket:

Zrínyi út 76. Jelenleg itt egy építkezés van és a gép a területen romlott el.

Ekkor még nem volt egyetlen házszám sem, találomra beütöttem hogy fejedelem utca zrínyi ilona utca kereszteződést, na itt bomlott minden, a fejedelem utca - Debreceni út kereszteződésben akart vinni Zrínyire, de ott csak egy szűk földút vitt be egy házhoz, ezért visszafordúltunk, utána túlmentünk a kölcsey-n be a görgey-re. jött a kínlódás mert a Radnóti Miklós fel volt ásva a vízmű szerelt éppen valamit és le volt zárva.

Ekkor szakítottam meg a Fejedelem utcát és adtam a kölcsey-n meg a jobb oldali házszámokat és jelöltem be kliens házszámát a zrínyi-n
ssummoner1 (2023-01-24 10:36:36+00:00): Szerintem a többi utca is megváltozhatott, vagy soha nem is volt az a nevük. De azokat nem láttam. Radnóti Miklós utca pl hatalmas kérdőjel név ügyileg.

Szerintem hagyjad az old_name-et hátha valaki még úgy emlékszik rá. Azért tettem old_name-be. Bár ki tudja.
Jitter123 (2023-09-06 13:43:23+00:00): Hallo, du hast für Weg: 38358881 Änderungen eingetragen und local knowledge angegeben. Ich bin da heute gefahren und habe diesen Weg nicht gesehen. Kann es sein dass du dich da vertan hast? Dann würde ich den nämlichb rauslöschen.
Scout Jens (2023-09-29 08:53:50+00:00): Ich habe da einen Weg gesehen. Eventuell ist dieser nur macnhmal befahren und somit nicht immer zu sehen. Also bitte nicht löschen, sondern einen Lifecycle-Präfix verwenden, wenn Du etwas ändern möchtest. Viele Grüße, Jens
Marc_ch (2023-01-07 15:05:11+00:00): Bonjour, bienvenue et merci pour votre contribution,
quel est votre invention en mettant l'url dans site web comme texte décrivant votre contribution ?
n'hésitez pas à rajouter le nom de la rue pour le batiment du coin
faites attention aussi au fait qu'il est hélas interdit de copier d'autres plans sauf si leur condition générale l'autorise explicitement.
Bonne continuation,
Marc
Diacritic (2023-01-07 04:32:56+00:00): Hey Derrick,

I can see you're moving quite a lot of suburb nodes around.

Can I ask what you're trying to do? Some of these suburb labels have been moved right to the edge of the locality.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130952531
Omegatherion (2023-01-07 13:02:40+00:00): Moin dbsus,
warum hast du hier die Wegerichtung der einen Rolltreppe umgedreht?
Andersrum ist das einfach auszuwerten.
Gruß Omegatherion
dbsus (2025-07-24 09:52:32+00:00): Hallo Omegatherion,
die Idee war/ist, dass Treppen im/am Bahnhof einheitlich von unten nach oben gezeichnet werden, wie im Architekturbereich üblich. Das hat den Vorteil, dass dann die Ebenen auch einheitlich und passend zur Steigung (incline=up/down) von unten nach oben weisen können ( z.B. level=0;1) .
Durch das conveying-Tag mit forward|backward ist die Richtung einer Rolltreppe präzise angebbar.
Viele Grüße
dbsus
MxxCon (2023-01-11 05:21:51+00:00): Hello.
Could you please explain why did you tag this as multipolygon?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130952766
aceman444 (2023-04-07 21:01:44+00:00): Hi, why do you randomly change the road class? What is your source? Surely not Ortofotomozaika SR as you claim.
Adam Haba (2023-04-08 09:10:41+00:00): I changed the class of this road because it connects a highway or expressway to a main road, so temporarily it is a main road.

Besides, I don't know why you are "digging up" this when I made this change long time ago. I know that among the "elites" I fell into line by not answering messages about my sentences (I didn't know how to do it and no notifications came to me) but to negate everything I did with a vengeance is childish and frivolous. 

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
SzymonH (2023-01-07 08:29:19+00:00): Źródło?
:-} (2023-01-07 11:14:48+00:00): Było w filmie Awizonosza o ile pamiętam
rskedgell (2023-01-06 15:58:50+00:00): (to Friday Street junction, not to Cannon Street)
L'imaginaire (2023-01-06 20:27:44+00:00): De pier heet wellicht niet "6m". Je kan niet zomaar de name-tag gebruiken om bepaalde tekst op de kaart te laten verschijnen.
martinst (2023-01-06 18:04:14+00:00): Der gelöschte Way 50948431 ist im Luftbild sichtbar.
Fabiooqko (2023-01-06 20:09:57+00:00): Das ist kein Weg, sondern ein kleiner Bach
martinst (2023-01-06 20:35:49+00:00): Ich meinte auch nicht den Bach sondern die gelöschte Verlängerung von Way 50948428 nach Osten.
Fabiooqko (2023-01-06 21:11:07+00:00): Ich check leider nicht, welcher Weg der 50948431 war. Ich wollte heute vom Feuchtrainweg über den gelöschten Weg zur Hofstadelstraße. Aber weit und breit kein Weg zu sehen. Auch als ich dann an der Ammer entlang nach Oberammergau gegangen bin hab ich keinen Weg gesehen. Wenn Du Dich vor Ort auskennst, dann korrigiere mich gerne, aber ich weiß nicht wie alt das Luftbild ist und was genau da zu sehen ist.
martinst (2023-01-06 21:25:58+00:00): Hier kann man den Änderungssatz betrachten:
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=130954075
Fabiooqko (2023-01-06 21:36:23+00:00): Ok, danke. Hab den vorhandenen Weg jetzt verlängert. Hast Du das gemeint?
martinst (2023-01-06 21:47:16+00:00): Ja, den meinte ich. Danke fürs Verlängern, war ja nur eine Kleinigkeit.
:-} (2023-01-06 16:36:31+00:00): Błędne oznaczenia do poprawy
Szymson (2023-01-06 17:07:09+00:00): Takie arbitralne opinie niczego nie wnoszą
RaphaelPasloin (2023-01-07 02:34:44+00:00): Hello,

You remove important data here : 
source:geometry:ref source:geometry:version 
And so all the osm history of the building parts by deleting it. It's one building yes but with 2 symmetrics part as indicated in the source you (i presume) used for the name.  And clearly visible on the "ridge" seperation on the roof.
bxl-forever (2023-01-07 19:09:40+00:00): I agree with @RaphaelPasloin: we should always make the effort to keep existing data as much as possible.

I restored one of the two former buildings and reused existing data and nodes + other minor fixes to this changeset.
eggie (2023-01-06 16:37:18+00:00): Top!
RaphaelPasloin (2023-01-07 03:02:34+00:00): Bonjour,

Pour mapper les buildings c'est indispensable d'utiliser l'imagerie "Imagerie numérique SPW(allonie) PICC " plutôt que l'imagerie aérienne qui est déformée par l'angle de prise de vue.
NorthCrab (2023-01-07 07:06:58+00:00): Such paths are usually marked with 'path' and not 'footway'.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=path
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=footway
YurasS (2023-01-07 11:36:37+00:00): Thank you, I fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130977483
zvenzzon (2023-01-27 10:09:45+00:00): Please STOP re-importing the name Sjonsgattu on the way 59103155. I've already corrected this mistake once. 
Before changing a name on a road, please read the history!

Please revert  changeset 130955058 immediately.

I grew up near Sjonsgattu and know where it ends and I don't care what is Trafikverket Road Network database. Don't copy their mistakes into OpenStreetMap database on the same way twice.

Thanks in advance.
DaveF (2023-01-11 10:51:13+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174675400

I'm aware the area has been cleared of foliage, but how is it used as a track?

FYI
Waterways carry on under bridges.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1127838223
NorthIsland (2023-01-12 14:49:42+00:00): Thanks for that. If you drive toward the car park, there is a gate on the line of the old railway, and a cleared (but obviously private) path leading over the disused bridge. Railways, whether used or disused, make a significant contribution to the local land appearance - particularly with embankments. Yep, my mistake on the brook water area. Thanks for fixing.
NorthCrab (2023-01-06 23:31:31+00:00): Uważaj aby nie przyłączać rzeczywistych obiektów (obrys budowy) do obiektów symbolicznych (linia drogi).
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10311422181

Poza tym jest okej!
XioNoX (2023-01-16 19:02:56+00:00): Hello!

Je viens de voir "Cycleway exclusive lane n’a pas de sens en FR".

J'utilise l'appli streetcomplete qui semble le rajouter automatiquement. Et si ça ne l'est pas il marque le segment en tant que "non fait".

Je ne connais pas les tags exacts à utiliser mais je pense qu'il faudrait faire remonter l'info sur https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 12:18:15+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10311472902/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
MountainCitadel (2023-01-06 18:02:36+00:00): Thanks for reaching out and for the update.
angys (2023-02-21 18:36:27+00:00): hello, can I know how you add these POIs?
Ripley12345 (2023-02-22 15:13:47+00:00): > how you add these POIs
I use JOSM with indoorhelper plugin, following this guide:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/indoorhelper

> can I know
No, you can not. Now unseen and forget what you read just now. 😈
WoodWoseWulf (2023-01-08 22:09:41+00:00): Hi again,
I'm not certain why you changed this barrier to a disconnected road? I have reverted this change.
Soshal Distan Singh (2023-01-14 00:49:21+00:00): Зачем вы на каждую точку, входящую в здание, поставили тег building=yes?!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1127846256 ➜ https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10311518659
Soshal Distan Singh (2023-01-14 00:50:22+00:00): И так во всём пакете правок, причём.
Rogoyski (2024-03-23 16:57:15+00:00): Nic nie rozumiem z opisu, zaś oznaczenie dziedzińca pałacu prezydenckiego jako parkingu to gruba przesada. Proszę pisz komentarze do zmian w taki sposób, aby można było zrozumieć, o co ci chodziło.