piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2025-10-21 02:30:03+00:00): #TIP: If you go to the imagery icon in the editor, on the right hand side, and select ESRI World Imagery, then the street and houses will be visible. Then either add an address node or draw the house outline with the address, it will be properly noded in OSM, which Amazon uses. 

I also removed the one way tag since the road is a two way road.

To help your neighbors, you could also add their houses and addresses along with yours.

I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173516317
NeisBot (2025-10-20 03:42:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-20 03:42:42+00:00): Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Financial services company in Englewood Colorado"
NeisReview (2025-10-22 15:55:54+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173518864
NeisBot (2025-10-20 03:57:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-20 03:57:41+00:00): Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Saw store"
user_5359 (2025-10-20 05:57:43+00:00): Correct time notation and reduce advertising by https://www.osm.org/changeset/173518780
NeisReview (2025-10-22 15:55:10+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173518780
mavl (2025-10-20 11:38:50+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы снова понизили статус дороги и добавили несуществующие одностороннее движение (тег oneway=yes). Временные явления на карте не обозначают. Мост скоро будет открыт. Изменения в этом пакете правок не отражают реальное состояние местности.   
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features
aharvey (2025-11-12 02:28:54+00:00): hi, all your changesets have now been reverted. You're changes appear to be vandalising the map. Please discuss anything you think was mapped correctly.
citrula (2025-10-20 20:48:26+00:00): If this road is temporarily closed, please don't delete it. You can use construction or access tagging if it is going to be closed for an extended period of time.
citrula (2025-10-21 18:51:06+00:00): I restored the deleted segment. If you have details about the closure, maybe I could provide some guidance about how to mark this correctly?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173597273
NeisBot (2025-10-20 04:33:41+00:00): Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Machine tool manufacturer in Palra Rajasthan"
NeisBot (2025-10-20 04:33:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-22 15:54:06+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173635099
ZhannaB (2025-10-24 17:09:35+00:00): Hi, Starboy Infinity!
Thank you for your contribution to the OSM. 

Could you please provide the source for this mapped complex? It doesn't look real. It was mapped some years ago, but wasn’t constructed yet, as I see on the latest aerial images.

Sincerely, ZhannaB.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173517357
AkuAnakTimur (2025-10-20 04:38:10+00:00): *T148

There's TomTom's street car view but they're from 2017... and not yielding any positive results.
FroschForscher (2025-11-08 10:43:35+00:00): Hallo cosphi du hast hier das spezifischen sport=archery zu dem generischen shooting=shootig geändert. Die verlinkte Webseite ist  weiterhin die für Bogenschießen.
Wie/Von wem wird dieser Platz genutzt? Nur Bogenschießen, dann ist sport=archery passender oder von verschiedene Schießsportarten, dann sollte die Webseite auch angepasst werden.

FroschForscher
cosphi (2025-11-08 11:17:25+00:00): Das war wohl ein versehen. Danke für den Hinweis. Hab es rückgängig gemacht-
NeisBot (2025-10-20 04:54:47+00:00): Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Learning center for autism therapy in Tampa FL"
NeisBot (2025-10-20 04:54:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-22 15:53:27+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173635064
Dimacn (2026-03-18 06:39:32+00:00): Пожалуйста не добавляйте дороги параллельно уже существующим, т.е. не дублируйте дороги когда они уже есть на карте. Во-вторых, в качестве названий дорог мы вносим только название улицы или название дороги регионального значения. Я исправил ваши ошибки.
旧加卷 (2025-10-23 03:48:10+00:00): "alt_name:zh=诸葛亮城"有无依据？
Taksine (2025-11-01 14:02:05+00:00): 有个UP主的视频显示有一幅地图在藏南地区的确有叫诸葛亮城，但无任何依据能证明是在科洛良。
蕉饼电脑 (2025-11-03 02:52:10+00:00): 感谢科普
NeisBot (2025-10-20 05:56:35+00:00): Hi soululamog, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 6 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=173518712
soululamog (2025-10-20 06:06:07+00:00): it was intentional. the deleted infrastuctures are nonexistent. it is very dangerous to have it on this map since it is used by ENAC (italian airforce) for managing the airspace.
AurélienQ (2025-10-20 17:05:23+00:00): Hi, this is a clear vandalizing. Your changeset is gonna be reversed.

OSM is a data base. The objects you deleted was mapped a in construction. A lot of websites and projects are using OSM data for rendering. Obviously you didn't understand how the map you're speaking about works. Then I suggest you to read the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/). 

Have a nice day.
Giuseppediff (2025-10-20 17:13:53+00:00): AurélienQ is right.
 The bridge was listed as an infrastructure under construction, not as an existing infrastructure. Go read how maps work before deleting any. 
The Italian  Comitato Interministeriale per la Programmazione Economica e lo Sviluppo has appuved the construction.
soululamog (2025-10-20 17:16:41+00:00): Vandalizing? Those infrastructures are not under construction, the project is not even been approved. This map is the foundation for ENAC regulations regarding civilian air travel in italy. It is very dangerous and measleading to have false information on that map.
soululamog (2025-10-20 17:19:11+00:00): Financing does not mean “under construction”, it was financed 20yeaes ago ad well.
AurélienQ (2025-10-20 17:19:40+00:00): Please read the wiki before argumenting. You still don't understand how it works...
Giuseppediff (2025-10-20 17:30:09+00:00): The financing is sufficient to include it. In any case, you should have converted it to a proposal and not deleted it. This shows that you don't know how OSMs work.
mbns (2025-10-20 18:16:41+00:00): Dear, sorry for the intrusion. The project in not financed at all. Corte dei Conti, an Italian Institute, acting as controller before the financing, has not already given the authorization to use the funds. Maybe we should know something about the process in the next month.
I deeply understood soululamog. As a drone pilot, "under construction" means the real possibility to encounter construction sites in a flight plan or directly during a flight, with legal implication also. In osm.wiki, this situation is to be reported as "proposed" and not "under construction". But I really don't know if there are direct implications on the symbols cause I did not find it in legend for lines.
AurélienQ (2025-10-20 18:26:35+00:00): I agree too that the state of the project should be "in construction", as we can't see works on place. 

But the main problem is the deletion of a lot of objects as new contributor without asking help or the confirmation that the changes you project to do are right (PS the forum.openstreetmap.org is here for help, soululamog).

Obviously, the few people on this discussion agree to say that it's more a proposal than a construction site. Then, I propose to re-establish the OSM objects, and switch the status of the bridge.
Taya_S (2025-10-21 12:07:38+00:00): Based on the discussion here, and the reports the DWG received, I have reverted this changeset. Please do try to correct the tagging though. I know nothing about this project, but from what is being said here, proposed does indeed sound more appropriate.

Best regards,  
Taya Snijder,  
On behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173578889
AurélienQ (2025-10-21 13:34:32+00:00): Here is the changeset correcting the status of the project : 173582880

Best regards,
Nikita Moiseev (2026-01-12 11:48:51+00:00): Добрый день. Линия: 1320033497 была нарисована по старым данным со спутниковых снимков, ныне данной дороги нет. Этот участок будет удалён.
NeisBot (2025-10-20 06:57:42+00:00): Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Zero Espacio Pilates yoga classes Las Palmas"
NeisBot (2025-10-20 06:57:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisRevert (2025-10-22 15:52:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173635008
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove unclear map edits
NeisBot (2025-10-20 07:03:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-20 07:03:40+00:00): Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Pilates studio in Las Palmas"
NeisRevert (2025-10-22 15:51:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173634986
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove unclear map edits
NeisBot (2025-10-20 07:15:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-20 07:15:41+00:00): Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Life coaching service in Singapore"
NeisReview (2025-10-22 15:50:59+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/173521628
dzidek23 (2025-10-20 13:06:53+00:00): 👋Hey Priyanka,
great to see you join and contribute to the OSM. 

I understand you are still learning, so here are some ideas and hints.

1. Remember to always connect paths, tracks, streets, stairs etc. If they're not connected, you can't navigate through them. There's no way to 'jump' from a pavement onto stairs or into a building without them touching one another.

2. Try not to map your home, flat or room (and say mapped because I live at no. XX). We all start by mapping our immediate surroundings, this is what everyone knows best, but a little anonymity won't hurt. 
We are all a friendly bunch, but this is an open project, so anyone can search data made available.

3. Finally, look at the OSM Wiki and see what info is required for which tag, what can be added as useful and what's irrelevant. Learn and follow the best practice at start, and it will be easier and more fun later on.


Every, even the smallest change matters, so keep up the good work and keep mapping.

Cheers
rempshaener (2025-10-20 08:48:55+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.

Zu den Überflurhydranten habe ich nur die Empfehlung, als Mindestangaben auch noch die Nennweite (der Zuleitung) und die Position zu erfassen.
Bei Bedarf kämen auch noch Anzahl und Typ der Schlauchkupplungen hinzu.

Zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13245295229 habe ich eine grundsätzliche Anmerkung:
emergency=water_tank und man_made=storage_tank passt nicht so richtig zusammen. Bei Löschwasserentnahmestellen hat sich eher eingebürgert, von der Art der Entnahme auszugehen. Das ist diese Stelle, hier https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=456800278744313&focus=photo&lat=47.718414008026&lng=10.555760083077&z=17&x=0.6492425073819292&y=0.6653006137631355&zoom=1.389261744966443, richtig?
Dann bietet sich folgendes Tagging an:
emergency=fire_hydrant
fire_hydrant:type=pipe
fire_hydrant:pressure=suction
couplings=1
couplings:diameters=A
water_source=water_tank
water_tank:volume=90 m³

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
eggie (2025-10-20 08:29:35+00:00): Dag William..

Lijkt me oke. Het enige is dat je verbindingsnodes zult moeten maken met de gebouwomtrekken.
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 	5
Ik heb het pad uitgelijnd mbv de BGT.
bicycle=no hoeft niet op footway. Dat is al default.
MVG
eggie
rempshaener (2025-10-20 08:52:34+00:00): Hallo,

hier nur eine Anmerkung zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13083790882
Wenn es sich um einen offenen Wasserbehälter (=Wasserentnahme per Saugschlauch und Saugkorb) handelt, der vorrangig der Feuerwehr dient, würde auch
emergency=water_tank
water_tank:volume=60 m³
reichen.

Wenn nicht: einfach melden.

Viele Grüße
eggie (2025-10-20 07:59:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Dat is een groot verschil. Je kunt zoiets doorgeven aan het Kadaster.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-20 09:02:10+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13245255870

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-20 08:21:34+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13145102401

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-20 09:02:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13145102401

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Syl (2025-10-21 14:11:15+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé cette modification, la deuxième partie du nom a sa place dans branch plutôt que dans name (j'avais déjà modifié il y a quelques mois).
NeisBot (2025-10-20 07:57:37+00:00): Hi Eydriyan, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Updated administrative boundary with name, removed town designation, and modified admin level"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
eggie (2025-10-20 08:10:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Nu is het boter nog vis.
name= Observatiehut(geen jachthut) hoort niet als naam op de kaart.

Niet name= gebruiken om iets te beschrijven. Dat kan wel met description.
Door wie wordt deze observatiehut gebruikt?
Wat wordt geobserveerd?
Vogelkijkhut?
Wildobservatie?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dbird_hide

of

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dwildlife_hide

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-10-20 08:19:04+00:00): Dit zou ook kunnen als het echt een toren is.
Ik heb er nu even een leisure=wildlife_hide van gemaakt.
Graag reactie.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-20 08:21:30+00:00): alternatief bij hoge post
man_made=tower + tower:type=observation + observation=wild_animal - An observation tower of significant height
Jasper72 (2025-10-20 08:26:15+00:00): deze observatiehut is niet voor openbaar gebruik en is privé eigendom.
Jasper72 (2025-10-20 08:27:04+00:00): ik woon zelf in de buurt en weet van welke vogelaar deze is
eggie (2025-10-20 08:31:13+00:00): Oke....  bedankt voor je reactie..

Maar in dat geval van een vogelaar is het een bird_hide

Gr eggie
mavl (2025-11-15 10:55:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2025-11-15 10:55:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
Maryna Makarava (2025-10-24 09:15:44+00:00): Hi! Could you please clarify the reason for changing the maximum speed limit from 40 to 30 on this road? 
According to the latest OSM sources (Mapillary traffic signs overlay by 2023), the maximum speed limit is 60 here (24.4729604, 54.31981529).
In your comment you do not specify what other evidence you use for making such changes. Would you mind giving more context of your edit? We want to make sure it’s aligned with the OSM editing guidelines. 
Best, Marina.
Department of Municipalities and Transport Abu_Dhabi (2025-10-26 07:30:57+00:00): Hi Maryna Makarava;
We have recent data from the Department of Municipalities and Transport, Abu Dhabi. We update names and maxspeeds in Abu Dhabi based on it. Additionally, we upload all our edits with the source "Department of Municipalities and Transport Abu Dhabi", meaning that our edit source is known.
Regared
Department of Municipalities and Transport Abu_Dhabi
Maryna Makarava (2025-10-27 08:46:03+00:00): Thank you for your clarification! Best regards, Maryna
eggie (2025-10-20 08:41:47+00:00): Dag Simone... Je hebt met je actie drie wandelroutes onderbroken. Dat geeft nu foutmeldingen.
Hoe lopen die routes dan nu? 
Wanneer het pad er nog is dan niet verwijderen svp,  maar als het pad is afgesloten dan access=no taggen.
Wanneer het pad opgaat in de natuur.. Dat zou ook kunnen dan taggen we disused:highway=path
Dan zal het pad niet meer renderen op de kaart.
Routes omleggen gaat niet met editor iD.. alleen met josm en de nodige ervaring.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-20 08:50:59+00:00): Voor nu even de routerelaties hersteld en het pad omgezet naar disused:highway=path
eggie (2025-10-20 09:09:01+00:00): De routes heb ik via de meest logische weg omgeleid. 
Of die omleiding klopt.. geen idee.
Het routeert in ieder geval weer. 
MVG
eggie
SimoneJ (2025-10-20 10:22:24+00:00): Hi Eggie,

Van onderaf gezien: 
De weg loopt nu verder door naar links en gaat dan naar boven en sluit dan weer aan op de weg waar de oude weg nu is weggehaald.

Het pad willen ze niet meer zichtbaar hebben ivm gevaar. als mensen de kaarten op hun telefoon zien, zien ze nog steeds dat pad en je hebt dan altijd mensen die erop gaan. Dat is gevaarlijk en willen ze niet. Het wordt ontoegankelijk en gaat op in de natuur. Het pad verdwijnt en is ook geen pad meer.
SimoneJ (2025-10-20 10:22:47+00:00): dank je!
eggie (2025-10-20 10:29:36+00:00): Dan is het voorlopig correct getagd en zal opnieuw intekenen voorkomen.
Groet..
eggie
SimoneJ (2025-10-20 10:33:04+00:00): dank voor je hulp en vragen/correcties!
nevw (2025-10-20 09:03:30+00:00): Hi, you need to shift this to the actual parking space instead of placing in the middle of a busy intersection.
handeli (2025-10-20 08:29:05+00:00): Ojanpaikkojen merkintöjen tarkastus jää odottamaan seuraavaa maastokäyntiä
richlv (2026-02-07 21:33:50+00:00): Hi, this changeset changed highway=track to highway=service this road.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1255796196/history
While that would have been a correct change for actual driveways, this one did not seem to be one - changed it back to track.
If there's information indicating otherwise, please share it so it could be adjusted correctly.
eggie (2025-10-20 08:47:53+00:00): Een choker is gewoon een wegversmalling en hoeft toch niet van de kaart verwijderd worden?
Het was wel verkeerd getagd. Ik heb er nu
traffic_calming=choker van gemaakt. Je kunt evt de breedte opgeven.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:traffic_calming%3Dchoker
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-20 08:48:39+00:00): De breedte is 4.84 hier
OSPRvB (2025-10-20 08:56:54+00:00): Bedankt voor de reactie. Mogelijk zit het niet in de Barrier. Maar als hulpdienst worden wij naar Hamerbijl 48 via Heijligerweg, Karrespoor en Ijzertijd gestuurd. Dit is niet logisch aangezien via Bronstijd de kortste route is.