piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Bondi Maps (2025-12-31 12:53:50+00:00): Gracias por corregir eso
SeaB33 (2025-12-31 05:55:29+00:00): i think i may have accidentally moved a pipe or something :(
TheSwavu (2025-12-31 05:59:40+00:00): iD snapped a node of one of your houses to the drain.

I have disconnected it.
eggie (2025-12-31 06:57:36+00:00): Dag FG,

Netjes gedaan.
Ik heb het voetgangersgedeelte iets aangepast met een recentere PDOK luchtfoto. Die zit (nog) niet in editor iD. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-31 07:09:32+00:00): warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 	2... opgelost.
Friendly Giant (2025-12-31 08:03:40+00:00): Dankjewel! Ik zie aan de linkerkant, aan de kant van de tureluurweg, nu wel wat rare verspringingen. Komt dat door verschillende tegels, of is er iets anders mis?
eggie (2025-12-31 08:07:16+00:00): Een paar keer ctrl F5 toetsen. Je cache leegmaken. Soms op meer zoom niveaus.
Probeer maar.
rskedgell (2025-12-31 11:37:48+00:00): If High Street is a highway maintainable at public expense, then access=permissive seems unlikely, as a revocable permission for all transport modes could only exist on an unadopted (privately owned road). It's also redundant where you've also got motor_vehicle=delivery (also not sure why you've changed this from motor_vehicle=destination added by a mapper who's actually been there, and which would include delivery).

The net effect of this on access permissions is that a carriage has permissive access to be driven down Uxbridge High Street. I really, really, doubt that the traffic orders or signage convey any such thing.
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-31 19:54:50+00:00): 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении
nevw (2025-12-31 23:02:15+00:00): Hi, a few problems here due to invalid multipolygon structure.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.41312&lat=-27.27945&zoom=16
Josm validator detects these but it
probably easiest to read the wiki and check the invalid types.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
Westbrooke117 (2026-01-01 05:51:32+00:00): Hi, thank you. I made a few attempts to solve it initially, but I'm having trouble getting something that works, mainly due to the coastline cutting the wooded area in two. I've just removed the area for now as it was initially just an early draft, but I'll look into how to properly handle such cases.
nevw (2026-01-01 07:21:15+00:00): If you prefer I can try to fix if you put the area back.
Westbrooke117 (2026-01-01 07:38:31+00:00): I've re-added the area in my latest changeset. I've left the Big Sandhills out of the multipolygon, which consequently renders it as a wooded area on the map. You're more than welcome to have a go at it. Could be a good learning experience for me.
nevw (2026-01-01 09:30:29+00:00): I think it is ok now. I made the big sand hill a multipolygon. The wood is a mp but not including the small segment of sand along the beach. Patches of wood in the big sand hill are outers for the wood mp and inners for the big sand hill mp.
I took the tag natural=wood off the patches of trees in the sand hill because they are tagged as wood in the wood relation.
There is another area of sand joining the big sand hill but probably not considered part of the big sand hill so I made that a multipolygon so I could use the shared segment in both.
Hope this helps. 
If you get deeply into micro-mapping complex natural areas you may need to use simple polygons with overlapping sides as mp may not be able to be resolved.
LudovicG (2025-12-31 16:15:04+00:00): Bonjour,
Encore moi :D

Pour le distributeur, je pense qu'il faut creuser par là : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:vending%3Deggs

Et pour rigoler un peu (ou briller en soirée ce soir), une liste indicative de ce que l'on peut trouver en distributeur : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dvending_machine#Liste_des_diff%C3%A9rents_distributeurs_automatiques
LudovicG (2025-12-31 16:15:56+00:00): J'avais oublié un exemple : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8916994502
mweper (2026-01-04 01:54:43+00:00): Hola. 
Que lado es par y que lado impar?
Esto sucede en todas las calles N-S o solo en esta?
La numeración es correcta?
vALT0r (2026-01-04 01:59:43+00:00): Lado oeste es par. No estoy seguro sobre el norte sur pero debe ser fácil de Googlear
mweper (2026-01-04 02:03:27+00:00): Ok, mañana revisaré y haré los cambios necesarios a gran escala. Gracias por avisar y colaborar.
mweper (2026-01-04 15:25:23+00:00): Primera parte, lado Este.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176822232

Segunda parte, lado Oeste + algunas correcciones.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176823651
DDD丶Samuel (2025-12-31 11:32:06+00:00): 您好，焦洛平高速铁路已于2024年6月开工，何来无中生有一说？
NeisRevert (2025-12-31 07:23:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/176660086
where the comment is: "Remove unclear map edits"
tms13 (2026-03-07 11:58:36+00:00): Way 1361517067 was used as outer by relation 18732621.  This change broke that relation.  Can you reinstate or otherwise repair the relation?  Thanks.
SekeRob (2025-12-31 07:31:23+00:00): Oh yes, rail corridors through woods and other landcover
empty_child (2025-12-31 12:36:35+00:00): Дмитрий, добрый день
Вы, конечно, взяли не самую добрую к новичкам задачу. Public transit всегда считался проблемой сильных духом. Прошу, посмотрите для примера валидные маршруты Тбилиси. Например, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19194955 (это мастер-маршрут, внутри у него основные части) и ознакомьтесь с лучшими практиками в вики (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B2%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%83%D1%81%D1%8B). У меня эта задача на карандаше, но не в данный момент, так как требует очень больших временных вложений (около 500 маршрутов на весь город, большая часть никак не присутствует в осм, остальная в виде ptv1)
Dmitry Bravikov (2025-12-31 12:45:33+00:00): Спасибо. Как раз изучаю статью. Пример посмотрю.
olo81 (2025-12-31 18:38:29+00:00): Dlaczego dajesz brak dostępu skoro droga jest przed ogrodzeniem? 
I dlaczego "no" a nie np. "private" ? 
Kolejny raz wygląda to na trooling.
bartgron (2025-12-31 18:52:53+00:00): Oprócz tego jest przesunięty niepotrzebnie punkt o 70 metrów. Zmiana zostanie wycofana
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-01-05 14:06:04+00:00): مرحبا، نرجوا عدم العبث بالتصنيف للقرى و وضعها تحت تصنيف غير حقيقي، وهذا ذكرناه لك مرار وتكرار كما حصل في التعليقات الأخرى هنا:
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=22118882
 وقد يؤدي بحظر التعديلات على حسابك، وتذكر هذه الخريطة عامة ويستفيد منها الجميع لذلك إذا لم تستطع المساعدة في رسم الأماكن المفيدة للناس فلا تقم بتخريبها!
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-01-05 14:06:20+00:00): مرحبا، نرجوا عدم العبث بالتصنيف للقرى و وضعها تحت تصنيف غير حقيقي، وهذا ذكرناه لك مرار وتكرار كما حصل في التعليقات الأخرى هنا:
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=22118882
 وقد يؤدي بحظر التعديلات على حسابك، وتذكر هذه الخريطة عامة ويستفيد منها الجميع لذلك إذا لم تستطع المساعدة في رسم الأماكن المفيدة للناس فلا تقم بتخريبها!
علي حقوي (2026-01-05 16:45:51+00:00): شاكر لك تم تعديلها الى قريه شاكر لك
tg4567 (2026-01-03 17:38:39+00:00): hocam apartman isimlerini name= yerine addr:housename= şeklinde girmek daha doğru olması lazım.
PardusPanteri (2026-01-04 10:02:28+00:00): ID kullanıyorum. Bina düzenlemeye girdiğimde İsim, Katlar, Adres şeklinde bölümler var. O yüzden İsim bölümüne apartman ismini giriyordum. Dediğinizi yapmam için yeni bir etiket oluşturup yapmam gerek. Daha doğru olabilir ama bu beni biraz yavaşlatacaktır. Keşke düzenleme kısmını name yerine housename olarak ayarlama seçeneğimiz olsaydı daha kolay olabilirdi. Dikakte almaya çalışacağım yine de...
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-01-05 01:06:41+00:00): Apartman adlarının name=* ile mi addr:housename=* ile mi eklenmesi gerektiği konusunda  OSM Türkiye topluluğunda ortak bir karar bildiğim kadarıyla yok. Her iki etiketi savundan da var. Mevcut duruma bakarsak Türkiye'de, apartman adı name=* etiketiyle eklenmiş apartman sayısı, addr:housename=* etiketiyle eklenmişlerden daha çok diye düşünüyorum.

Türkiye'de birçok apartman building=apartmanets ile etiketli olmasa da, building=apartments etiketli binalarda geçen addr:housename sayısı, addr:housename'in önemli bir kısmını oluşturuyor. Bu da etiketin kullanım oranı hakkında bir fikir edinebilmemizi sağlıyor. Türkiye'de addr:housename 3940 kez kullanılmış. https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/europe:turkey/keys/addr:housename 

building=apartments etiketinin kombinasyonlarında name=* 23.857 kez, addr:housename=* ise 1970 kez geçiyor. https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/europe:turkey/tags/building=apartments#combinations Apartman olarak eklenen binalarda ad eklerken name=* kullanımı daha yüksek. (Tüm name=* etiketleri apartman adlarını gösteriyor demiyorum, bazen apartmanın giriş katındaki işletme tüm apartmana kendi adını yazabiliyor. Bazen ad dışındaki bilgiler name=* e eklenebiliyor. Ama yine de 23.857, 1.970 den çok büyük. Aradaki fark bu istisnai hatalar ile açıklanamaz.)

Apartman adlarının addr:housename ile mi addr:name ile mi eklenmesi gerektiği daha önce birkaç kez OSM Türkiye Telegram grubunda da tartışıldı. OSM forumunun Türkiye bölümünde farklı addr:* etiketlerinin kullanımı hakkında bir konu oluşturmuş ve o konuda Telegram'da konuşulan addr:housename ile ilgili savları da elimden geldiğince özetlemeye çalışmıştım. İlgili konuda yeni bir görüş bildiren de olmadı.(Düşüncemi forumda açtığım konuda yazmıştım. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/turkiyede-addr-etiketinin-kullanimi-ve-adresler-hakkinda-sorular/138800 )

@tg4567 de addr:housename hususunu şu değişikliğin tartışma kısmına da yazmıştı: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165966720 

Eğer topluluk, addr:housename kullanılmasına karar verirse @PardusPanteri'nin de hatırlattığı üzere editörlerde gerekli düzenlemelerin yapılması gerek. Örneğin şu anda iD'de İngiltere'de bir bina çizerseniz iD, addr:housename 'e bilgi eklemeyi sağlayan bir kutu oluşturuyor. Aynısının Türkiye'de de olması için OSM editörlerinde hata kaydı oluşturmak gerek. Editörler düzeltilmedikçe yeni katkıcılar apartman adlarını name=* ile eklemeye devam edecektir. Fakat ondan da önce bu konunun toplulukça netleştirilmesi gerek. Konuyla ilgilenmek isteyen varsa forumda yeni konu açması yararlı olabilir.
Kovoschiz (2026-01-02 07:35:17+00:00): Please don't remove `amenity=` + `name=`
Kovoschiz (2026-01-02 07:37:13+00:00): 2. You confused 397 ("Prison") and 399 ("Correctional Institution")
3. Please use meaningful upload comments
Kovoschiz (2026-01-02 07:30:38+00:00): Please don't remove, or delete other `building=`
eggie (2025-12-31 08:50:53+00:00): Dit gaat niet helpen. Het paaltje zul je moeten verbinden met de rijbaan.
motor_vehicle=no hoort niet op een paaltje en geeft problemen met moped en mofa.
bicycle en foot=yes zijn default en hoef je niet te taggen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-31 08:52:27+00:00): Dag Gert,

Verbind je paaltje met de weg. Verwijder de regel motor_vehicle=no

Dat geeft problemen.
bicycle en foot=yes is niet nodig.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-31 08:53:44+00:00): Zie commentaar eerder
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165415636#map=19/51.861537/6.037617&layers=N
Gert4321 (2025-12-31 09:04:40+00:00): thx voor je hulp heb het aangepast
eggie (2025-12-31 09:14:41+00:00): Top!
eggie (2025-12-31 08:57:59+00:00): Dag Mees,

Is Lauwendael een project naam of echt de naam van de buurt.
Graag reactie
eggie
Meesvansteenbergen (2025-12-31 09:11:32+00:00): Dat durf ik niet met zekerheid te zeggen.
eggie (2025-12-31 09:17:10+00:00): Mees .. Probeer het uit te zoeken.
Projectontwikkelaars geven een nieuwbouwproject gewoon een naam. Het liefst met 'ae' want dat komt sjiek over.
Maar dat is dan niet de naam van een wijk of buurt.

MVG
eggie
Meesvansteenbergen (2025-12-31 09:20:14+00:00): Ik zal het uitzoeken.
eggie (2025-12-31 09:24:13+00:00): Top!
jaap de vries (2026-01-02 14:13:22+00:00): Dit is de naam van de projectontwikkelaar en website https://www.lauwendael.nl/  maar de buurt gaat zo niet heten Mees
eggie (2026-01-02 16:47:01+00:00): Jaap..Mees is even op nonactief gezet door de DWG.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-03 04:52:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2428106186
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095487043

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
trial (2026-01-01 12:50:07+00:00): Bonne année !
old_name=Le Fournil
Permert de conserver l'ancien nom (la boulangerie peut rester connue sous l'ancien nom "un certain temps").
NeisBot (2025-12-31 14:21:20+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13420587879 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Math tutoring center for students"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-07 17:44:42+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176682994
Thanks @user_5359
Halfix (2026-01-01 08:20:07+00:00): Hi, ich nehme mal an, dass du nicht aus der Gegend stammst, sonst wäre dir beim Anfassen von way/25472101 und way/515671604 sicher aufgefallen, dass die Destination Unsinn ist. Dieser Abzweig geht Richtung Zentrum und Erlangen-Ost (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=49.57592460325&lng=11.017496734833003&z=18.47900548898658&pKey=4313784382031715&focus=photo). Erlangen-West ist geradeaus die Paul-Gossen weiter.
eggie (2025-12-31 10:47:22+00:00): Dag Gert,
Het klopt nu..
Groet
eggie
Dillen GJ (2025-12-31 11:03:36+00:00): Haha je bent me net 2 uur voor !
Zocht me een ongeluk , had ik het helemaal rond en wilde de object def erop zetten ben je voor ! Top !
rarad74 (2025-12-31 15:40:33+00:00): Salut. Daca pe Apple market ai acces  la o aplicatie numita TomTom care foloseste ca baza de randare hartile openstreetmap, potio vedea traficul real on zona Chiajna si pe acolo pe unde chiar apare strazi colorate de la verde la rosu , poti pune strazile ca tertiare, deoarece ala este traficul real. Verifica te rog de doua ori inainte sa salvezi, daca nu ai lasat vre-un drum deconectat.
eggie (2025-12-31 09:22:29+00:00): Mees  Een kantorenpark is geen buurt.
Wanneer dit geen woonbuurt is dan een vlak maken. landuse=commercial?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dcommercial

MVG
eggie
Meesvansteenbergen (2025-12-31 09:33:12+00:00): Bedankt voor de top. Ik ben nog niet zo nauwkeurig met zo'n vlak intekenen eerlijk gezegd.
eggie (2025-12-31 09:35:02+00:00): De poi het ik verwijderd De buurt zelf lig meer naar het westen en staat al op de kaart.
rarad74 (2025-12-31 16:00:50+00:00): Te rog NU MAI STERGE DRUMURI. [ENTRU ULTIMA DATA LA DRACU!!!! O SA FII BLOCAT DEFINITIV.  Azi am trecut pe acolo si exista posibilityatea sda vii de pe BD timisoara  si sa o iei in sus pe Valea cascadelor. Poti sa verific asta si pe Waze google ca sda vezi si alte suse. FA dracu ceva pe masura cunostintelor tale si nu te mai baga la drumuri.
eggie (2025-12-31 09:27:11+00:00): Dag DvdWielen.
Een parkeermogelijkheid teken je in als vlak met amenity=parking
parking=street_side
Daarin kun je de losse parkeervakken intekenen met parking_space.
Dit doet niets in osm.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-31 09:29:15+00:00): Aangepast als bovenstaand .. Straatnaam verwijderd
eggie (2025-12-31 09:32:25+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side
eggie (2025-12-31 09:31:48+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. Geen name=gebruiken om iets te beschrijven. 
Naam Laadpunt verwijderd.
Het beste kun je later op de PC in een reguliere editor je toevoegingen checken. 
MVG
eggie
bxl-forever (2025-12-31 10:07:25+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for this. Was the name of the market only signed in French? I don’t recall spotting a sign with a name here, so it must have been added quite recently. Do you remember what was written on the sign?
Thanks in advance.
kayllab (2025-12-31 10:42:27+00:00): Oh my bad, I though the streetcomplete quest was just for the place name and not the market itself. 

Removed it now just now
mueschel (2026-01-01 10:35:57+00:00): Hi,
please don't invent new tags just to "silence JOSM warnings".  watersheds are being mapped since more than 15 years without the need for such a tag.

These ways are part of a proper relation with an at least documented type. That should be perfectly sufficient to just ignore warnings of an imperfect validator.
Harald Hetzner (2026-01-01 11:44:20+00:00): Hi,
The type=watershed tag is obviously used for relations on drainage systems of rivers which collect all the waterway ways within the main stream's drainage basin. What I mapped is a drainage divide. It is the line of division between two adjacent basins. If there is established tagging for a drainage divide, then please provide the reference.
ManuelB701 (2026-01-01 11:46:11+00:00): In fact, many of the ways you modified are part of relation (type=multilinestring to be precise) which means they formally don't need to be tagged with anything and JOSM only complains because that sort of relation hasn't been implemented yet.

It's like adding tags to a type=multipolygon relation (area equivalent) just to suppress warnings in an editor (not necessarily JOSM because that one can handle them) because it doesn't know that multipolygon members don't need any tag to be a valid on OSM.
mueschel (2026-01-01 11:57:26+00:00): (+1 to what Manuel wrote)

For huge features like this that partially can reuse existing objects like ridges, tags on the ways are not really helpful and all tagging should be on relations. If this is type=watershed (which is mostly used in a different sense), but e.g. here for the alpine divide: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14461262
Or another type like 'drainage_divide' or 'water_divide' can be discussed / propose.
Harald Hetzner (2026-01-01 12:42:12+00:00): I would assume that they guy who mapped the Alpine divide got it wrong. Only Americans  use the watershed term for a drainage basin. For normal English speakers, it is synonymous with drainage divide. But the OSM concept of watershed is understanding it the AE way.
Harald Hetzner (2026-01-01 14:25:22+00:00): Regarding the resuse of existing ways, it is something that I have considered, but decided against, because I assume that it will create issues:
- Particularly where ridges are oriented normal to the major direction of the divide, the typically leaves the ridge somewhere to follow the valley divide to the next ridge. Therefore, we would need to split existing continuous ridges even if these are named, have Wikidata and Wikipedia, and Wikidata referenecs the ID of the ridge way. A pattern that we do also observe quite often is the divide running up a hill and running down again at an angle < 90°.
- Reusing ridges will significantly increase the amount of relation members
Elsewhere, relations do also often not resuse existing ways, but only the notes. For example forest and meadow relations typically do not use road ways and even if forest and meadow share a boundary line, they do nevertheless use distinct ways for their boundary lines.
Harald Hetzner (2026-01-01 14:29:54+00:00): Concerning the Alpine Watershed https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14461262, they tagged the ways with type=boundary and boundary=geographical where they did not use administrative borders to approximate the drainage divide.
Harald Hetzner (2026-01-01 14:52:41+00:00): Is there documentation on type=drainage_divide? I was looking for it, but could not find it.
foreigner037 (2026-02-21 10:58:50+00:00): Здравей,

минава ли по този участък или видя че е изградено кръгово в някакъв новинарски сайт? Не мога да намеря източници за съществуването му.
peter_sl (2026-02-21 17:30:01+00:00): Да, минах два пъти и кръгово има. Възможно е само да не съм го начертал съвсем точно, защото го прерисувах от waze.
NieWnen (2025-12-31 13:06:59+00:00): Za wcześnie.
Błędne teryt:simc
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-09 05:34:43+00:00): czyli to nie są zmiany od 2026?
Aethonatic (2025-12-31 21:22:51+00:00): Is the cycleway actually disused now? Wouldn't access=no be a more accurate tag for this sort of situation?
Dave Venables (2026-01-01 09:13:03+00:00): I initially just set access=no https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176663514 to the foot and cycle paths where construction is taking place. Then updated again to make the cycle path even less visible.
After construction is completed would expect the route to be slightly different and a full survey will be required for the path and for removed trees and new walls
The relations for cycle routes 6 and 68 still include this section and if formally diverted, via the Riverside gardens or otherwise, these will also need to be updated.
silversurfer83 (2025-12-31 11:28:00+00:00): Hi :)

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht.

Ich glaube deine Intention hier verstanden zu haben und finde es gut, dass du den Metzger nicht einfach löscht.

Wenn du im Bearbeiten Modus den Punkt anwählst kannst du in der Spalte links (Bearbeite Objekt) weit nach unten scrollen bis zu Abschnitt "Eigenschaften" und diesen ausklappen. Dort findest du alle Eigenschaften (tags) im Klartext. Das Wort "disused" sollte vor "shop" gesetzt werden, so dass dort "disused:shop" | "butcher" zu lesen ist.
Die Zeile mit "amenity|disused" kannst du wieder löschen.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176664281
limes11 (2025-12-31 11:07:47+00:00): Hallo,

ich kann jetzt nicht alles prüfen, aber der Recher Bahnsteig geht definitiv weiter nach Westen, die Lage war zuvor korrekt. Direkt unter der Brücke steht eine Bank am Bahnsteig.

Bitte nicht ohne Ortskenntnis anhand von alten Luftbildern die Lage der Bahnsteige anpassen. 

Viele Grüße
onterof (2025-12-31 17:16:31+00:00): Hmm, bei der Fahrt vor einigen Tagen sah es aus, als ende die taktile Markierung (also auch der Bahnsteig?) vor der Brücke, sonst hätte ich auch da nix geändert. Falls das nicht stimmt korrigiere ich's wieder.

Der Rest sind nur hinzugefügte tags, die den aktuellen Zustand beschreiben bzw. von Dingen die eh schon separat eingetragen waren und (wo zutreffend) description zu name geändert.
onterof (2026-01-01 10:43:14+00:00): Hab den Bahnsteig wieder verlängert.
limes11 (2026-01-01 12:15:50+00:00): Danke. 

Ich komme da ab und an vorbei und schaue dann beim nächsten Mal nach dem tactile_paving-Bereich.
NeisBot (2025-12-31 14:21:24+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/224023 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Software development company"
---
Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего текста могла бы быть: "Компания по разработке программного обеспечения"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-07 17:44:42+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176954469

Only the affected tags were deleted; other unrelated data was left untouched
Taya_S (2026-02-12 12:44:14+00:00): Reverted data imported from Google

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178456222
Lyon-St-Clair (2026-01-01 19:29:56+00:00): il ne faut pas tracer une ligne en mettant un trait, il faut ajouter l'attribut à la voirie existante.