piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
fortera_au (2024-01-21 22:04:43+00:00): Hi there, please try and keep your changeset bounding boxes smaller where possible, this edit stretches across several continents.
literan (2024-01-22 16:02:11+00:00): construction=grass
landuse=construction я заменил на construction:landuse=grass

construction=playground
leisure=construction я заменил на construction:leisure=playground

в соответствии с вики https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
literan (2024-01-22 16:02:34+00:00): прошу в дальнейшем также пользоваться корректными тегами
Marek-M (2024-01-22 07:05:39+00:00): Cześć, prawdopodobnie chciałeś nanieść na mapę rzeźby z plenerów rzeźbiarskich ale zamiast tego utworzyłeś zakłady rzeźbiarskie. Dodatkowo do tagu name wprowadziłeś informacje, które tam nie pasują. Przerzuciłem je do tagu description. Moje poprawki w changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146539033
wierci (2024-01-23 13:29:31+00:00): Dzięki wielkie za poprawki!
SomeoneElse (2024-01-22 14:06:01+00:00): Thanks!
woodpeck_repair (2024-01-21 22:28:07+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 144899364, 145002640, 145849743, 145894739, 146043153, 146113770, 146115767, 146115884, 146150957, 146167992, 146168225, 146183888, 146184169, 146184247, 146246109.
DWGmessCleanup20240122 (2024-01-22 06:07:20+00:00): Bei allem tun sollte man jeweils darauf achten nicht das Kind mit dem Bade auszuschütten. Dieses Changeset ist nur noch pure Zerstörungswut, welche durch nichts zu rechtfertigen ist.
DWGmessCleanup20240122 (2024-01-22 06:13:44+00:00): Eine Wohnstraße zu löschen bedeutet  eine Granate in eine bewohnte Siedlung abzufeuern. Abscheulich und widerlich.
DWGmessCleanup20240122 (2024-01-22 06:21:58+00:00): Die Fußgängerzone in Lofer zu löschen ist gleich eine Granate auf dessen Dorfzentrum abzufeuern. Abscheulich und widerlich.
DWGmessCleanup20240122 (2024-01-22 06:23:27+00:00): Leichtfertig Neubauten zu löschen verzögert möglicherweise den Rettungseinsatz. Das kann im Extremfall Menschenleben gefährden.
Vinber (2025-02-22 05:06:34+00:00): Bonjour,
quelques infos pour les changesets et leurs commentaires :)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Faites_de_bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications

bonne carto
DWGmessCleanup20240122 (2024-01-22 06:06:58+00:00): Bei allem tun sollte man jeweils darauf achten nicht das Kind mit dem Bade auszuschütten. Dieses Changeset ist nur noch pure Zerstörungswut, welche durch nichts zu rechtfertigen ist.
xkillah (2024-04-03 05:54:07+00:00): Hi, highway=busway are for separate dedictaed ways not bus lanes. Currently bus lanes in Tbilisi are tagged with busway:left/right=* on main ways. You can read about bus lanes tagging here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bus_lanes
xkillah (2024-04-03 06:07:24+00:00): oh, I'm sorry, it was created in another changeset, not yours
MxxCon (2024-02-04 06:53:12+00:00): These are not townhouses and they shouldn't be tagged as such. These are apartment buildings.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146530767
Allison P (2024-02-04 16:34:25+00:00): How do you figure? They look like townhomes to me, based on the shared walls, lack of corridors, and linear layout.
MxxCon (2024-02-04 16:42:24+00:00): Apartment building doesn't have to be a huge multistory block. It can be a smaller 2-3-apartment building too. Based on the address nodes distribution the density looks to be higher like apartments rather than single-family townhouses
questfinder (2024-02-04 16:47:18+00:00): MxxCon, 
Townhouses are rows of buildings attached together with different entrances, whereas apartment buildings have one main entrance.

please check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=terrace and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dapartments
MxxCon (2024-02-04 16:58:45+00:00): Apartment building doesn't need to have one main entrance. There are plenty of apartment buildings with either multiple main entrances or with apartment access directly from the street.
Apartment building is a residential building with multiple independent dwellings. The type of access to them doesn't determine that.
Mashin (2024-01-22 07:57:43+00:00): Hi, when drawing elements like fairways, greens, etc. do not create overlaps between them.
Please see here for more details:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls
MxxCon (2024-02-04 06:55:18+00:00): You created multipolygon building relation 17062714 out of 2 unrelated features. This should be corrected.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146531842
woodpeck (2024-02-14 19:16:59+00:00): Dear mrpacmanmap, you have added maxspeed information to 1237 highway objects in Sandwell citing "sandwell.activemap.co.uk" as your source. This web site, however, says "Copyright © 2024 Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council. All rights reserved." Can you clarify?
do not bring quebec into this (2024-02-28 05:01:52+00:00): um, where?
NeisBot (2024-01-22 01:31:04+00:00): Hello marcus127, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-20 22:10:29+00:00): Are you aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?

What is the license of this imported data and real source of this data?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-20 22:11:34+00:00): Also, where this import was discussed with OSM community?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-23 13:20:22+00:00): See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/inconsistancy-in-the-wiki-for-reef-coral-coral-reef/145584
rskedgell (2024-01-22 09:00:49+00:00): I wonder how many of these were introduced as a result of iD's policy of presenting inexperienced users with a list of access tags irrelevant to the highway=* type?
Vas111 (2024-01-22 12:35:00+00:00): I was once fooled by this as well, although iD does also show the implied values
NeisBot (2024-01-29 02:31:04+00:00): Hello marcus127, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
JasonBob (2024-07-19 15:31:35+00:00): Is there a reason you changed these all to sand, then grass? The spaces between the runways, aside from the Least Tern nesting areas, appear to be asphalt. The nesting areas are gravel/sand.
NeisBot (2024-01-25 01:31:04+00:00): Hello IJNSena, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
citrula (2024-01-22 03:26:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM. You changed the name of the road here, instead of making a new POI.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146533980
citrula (2024-01-22 03:26:59+00:00): I am reverting this change. Feel free to ask here or on the community forums ( https://community.openstreetmap.org/ ) if you need further guidance

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146534917
streckenkundler (2024-01-22 07:40:35+00:00): Was ist die Quelle dieser beiden Änderungen (incl. CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146533995)
Ewen Hill (2024-01-22 02:45:34+00:00): Nice work Chris!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146534157
MxxCon (2024-01-25 01:15:43+00:00): Since in US there’s no official regulatory body managing hotel star ratings and each hotel can rate themselves however many stars they want, it serves no purpose other than promotional/advertisement for the hotels.
As such, the use of stars=* tag for hotels should be deprecated and this tag deleted.
Frame&Focus (2024-01-25 08:17:42+00:00): Ah, thanks for explaining. I've fixed this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146661651.
opendcc (2024-01-22 05:09:11+00:00): Hallo,

nochmal eine letzte Erinnerung: name ist nur der Eigenname und bitte eine gültige Datenquelle für all diese Änderungen benennen. Ansonsten wird das als Vandalismus betrachtet und es erfolgt eine Meldung an die DWG. Vielen Dank.
Warin61 (2026-02-04 22:07:08+00:00): Relation 17064124 
Stops in wrong order... Syd Metro West from Hunter St ... but first stop is Westmead .. and exit only.
DressyPear4 (2024-01-23 13:26:36+00:00): Em toda extensão? Tem notícia?
Até porque pelos traços strava  são apenas em algumas partes.
Aqui por exemplo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241838521
está duplicado?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146535582
BCNorwich (2024-01-22 08:26:53+00:00): Fiction removed
nevw (2024-01-22 08:08:40+00:00): Hi
you have changed the name of the wooded area multipolygon to Mulgoa Nature Reserve.
but the Mulgoa Nature Reserve has different bounds and is mapped already here https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6322278#map=15/-33.7911/150.6627
Probably easiest to revert this changeset and add the tags...
bicycle=no, motor_vehicle=no, motorcycle=no to the correct Mulgoa Nature Reserve.
Do you want me to do this?
nevw (2024-01-25 06:43:47+00:00): I have deleted the name and added tags from the wood multipolgon.
The Mulgoa Nature Reserve seems ok. 
I didn't add the bicycle, motor_vehicle, motorcycle =no tags to the reserve as the access ways within as they seem to be tagged as needed, though I didn't check every one.
Normal practice is to add the access restrictions to the ways within protected areas instead of adding to the boundary multipolygon, but feel free to add them if you prefer.
nevw (2024-01-25 06:56:40+00:00): I added bicycle=no to all ways within Mulgoa Nature Reserve.
TS27 (2024-01-28 23:01:31+00:00): Hi Nevw,
I added the no bicycles and motor vehicle tags to the entire reserve, as unfortunately a lot of the tracks that are being utilised are not official andhave actually been made illegally therefore are not availbale on OSM. They crisscross the entire park and are causing a lot of damage
nevw (2024-01-29 02:31:54+00:00): A pity to see the little we have as protected areas being destroyed so relentlessly
nevw (2024-01-29 07:15:44+00:00): I added motor_vehicle=no to all tracks within Mulgoa Nature Reserve
pLoskutov (2024-01-22 05:57:53+00:00): Hey. This is a new road. Why did you cut it up again?
GrabID_Resna (2024-01-22 11:27:12+00:00): Hi pLoskutov, thanks for your feedback, I have reverted my changeset to the previous version, referring to your feedback and your information in changeset 146124414 (5 hours ago) that this is a new road.
Thanks again and Happy Mapping!
WoodWoseWulf (2024-01-22 10:01:41+00:00): Hi Rexreator, I'm not sure if leisure=park is the best tag for these areas. Are they camp grounds? Woodlands?
jmarchon (2024-01-22 05:56:14+00:00): Nice work!
caseywittmier (2024-05-12 01:46:24+00:00): Going through old emails, I saw that I missed the notification for your comment. I appreciate the kind words.
gebux (2024-01-24 12:05:43+00:00): Hallo baum10,
du hast in diesem Changeset das riesige Wald-MP https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5804722 gelöscht. Ich versuche mal ob ich es wieder herstellen kann.
baum10 (2024-01-24 12:47:44+00:00): Hallo gebux
Ist nicht mit Absicht gewesen. Ich weiß nicht wie das Passiert ist, ich weiß nur das beim Hochladen eine Meldung kam das es eine neuere Version gibt. Und ich das Hochladen abgesprochen habe. Aber trotzdem was Hochgeladen wurde wie ich später bemerkte.
Ich danke dir für das wieder herstellen der Wald-MP
Lg
BCNorwich (2024-01-22 08:28:56+00:00): Please don't add any more fictional motorways.
julcnx (2024-01-23 02:30:31+00:00): Hey SLV_osm, thanks for your contributions! I merged your node with another nearby point of sale which had an invalid location. Just a heads up, in Thailand, we tag fuel vending machines as amenity_vending_machine + vending=fuel. You can find more details in the Thailand wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Fuel_Dispensing_Facilities
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146537317
freeExec (2024-01-23 06:22:12+00:00): Название улицы с виду не правильное. Что за "участок №2"? И в названиях не используют сокращения, типа "ул.", а пишут полностью
MxxCon (2024-01-25 02:00:31+00:00): Hello.
Please note that it's inappropriate to tag the whole building as a single business when that business occupies only a part of this building.
As such this edit will be reverted in full.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146537531
hatul (2024-11-04 09:34:16+00:00): שלום, תייגתי את העגלה בתגיות הנכונות:
amenity=cafe
street_vendor=yes
לא נכון לתייג אותה בתור אטרקציה. תודה.
woodpeck_repair (2024-01-22 08:33:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146542128 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by beautifulplaces sock puppet
freeExec (2024-01-22 08:50:01+00:00): А чего магазин не отметили?
NeisBot (2024-01-22 15:46:56+00:00): Just a test?
--------
Nur ein Test oder soll der Name dauerhaft so bleiben?
wireguy (2024-01-22 12:26:21+00:00): Linarraj,  this does not seem like a oneway from the imagery.  Bing Streetside seems to show it is two-way. Do you have another imagery that says otherwise?  Please comment.
pachpora (2024-01-25 05:09:10+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing the changeset and highlighting the issue, these changes were mistakenly made. We have passed the feedback to our editor and asked her to be extra cautious while editing on public osm. I have corrected the changes #Changeset:146656699. Thank you for the support.

Regards,
pachpora
BrokenRoute (2024-01-22 07:46:29+00:00): Проясните, пожалуйста, почему у way 819550982 был заменен атрибут highway с track на service, Вы были на месте, видели эту дорогу? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/819550982/history#map=19/51.82763/23.73596
woodpeck_repair (2024-01-22 13:12:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 146552904, 146552905 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed import of MS building footprints
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 12:26:27+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11503139201/history has building = proposed that was added in this edit
Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here.
AndySchulte (2025-05-16 07:55:38+00:00): Hi Mateusz,
thanks for your message!

I've just reworked the entire residential development area using the latest aerial imagery.
The tag building=proposed has been removed accordingly.

My original changeset is about 1.5 years old – honestly, I can’t say for sure what the exact situation was back then. But I've now updated the area to reflect the current state as best as possible.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-16 15:15:39+00:00): thanks for upadte!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-16 15:15:55+00:00): update, obviously
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-26 08:19:41+00:00): Removed blatently SEO spam description and other SEO spam tags in changeset 183193308

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183193308
这里没有鱼 (2024-01-24 03:25:19+00:00): 删除的数据已回退
pyram (2024-09-29 20:23:47+00:00): Hi berjk,
Du hast hier "die Straße verlängert". Das ist aber gar keine Straße, sondern eine private Hoffläche/-zufahrt. Gleichzeitig scheinst Du die Gegend zu kennen, weil Du diverse Adressen dort erfasst hast. Irgendwie ist das irritierend...
PS: Der Fehler wurde vor zwei Jahren schon einmal behoben: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93710283
berjk (2024-09-30 23:37:40+00:00): geändert in service / privat.
这里没有鱼 (2024-01-24 03:24:53+00:00): 已回退
❤️‍🔥 (2024-01-22 07:16:16+00:00): also added some flags and power outlets in this changeset
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-22 08:00:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1914791978
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/706413761

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
HellMap (2024-01-22 21:05:19+00:00): Čau!

Vai šo celiņu nojauca/neuzbūvēja? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207110416/history

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=199061969891421&focus=photo
UrSuS (2024-01-29 18:29:20+00:00): Es atgriezu, Nepamanīju :)
A67-A67 (2024-01-25 20:17:20+00:00): Hoi, 
Ik snap niet helemaal waarom het deel onder de overkapping een drive-through is, maar de rest van de serviceweg niet. Daarnaast is het niet gebruikelijk om drive-through bij tankstations te gebruiken.

TinQ is trouwens met een hoofdletter Q. Ik zal dat terugzetten.
Reisinformatiegroep (2024-01-26 14:13:43+00:00): Hoi, ik had eerder vanuit een ander mapper te horen gekregen dat het juist wel gangbaar was. 
"service=driveway bij tankstations is vrij gangbaar, en bij covered=yes is het prima om deze op de dakgrens"
A67-A67 (2024-01-26 16:13:26+00:00): Als ik rondkijk zie ik tagging eigenlijk alleen op tankstations waar jij deze tag hebt toegevoegd.

service=driveway betekent trouwens oprit. Dat is het zeker niet. service=drive_through is nog te verdedigen, maar dan wel voor de hele weg, niet alleen het overdekte deel.

Ik ga het eens navragen op het forum.
A67-A67 (2024-01-26 16:36:18+00:00): Je ben van harte welkom om mee te praten: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/service-drive-through-bij-tankstations/108507
Miśkov (2024-02-07 05:32:55+00:00): Miejscowy Plan nie wskazuje, że droga jest w budowie. Skąd informacja, że dodane drogi są w budowie lub niebawem rozpocznie się budowa? Drogi planowane oznaczamy tagiem planned i nie wyświetlają się one domyślnie w OSM.
YomanNH (2024-02-12 21:34:14+00:00): Nawet w opisie zmian jest, że drogi będą "wkrótce budowane", więc zapewne jest to do poprawy. Ale nie będę ruszał bez weryfikacji w terenie.
Miśkov (2024-02-12 21:36:40+00:00): Ja mogę potwierdzić brak budowy w terenie. Mam widok z okna :) Dlatego mnie zdziwiło jak się ta droga pojawiła w osm.
YomanNH (2024-02-12 21:41:56+00:00): No to w takim razie poprawiłem. Dzięki :)
bxl-forever (2024-01-22 09:18:35+00:00): Hello,

Nice try but please do not do such a thing.

Postcodes and city names in Belgium are automatically obtained through existing areas and should not be added on addresses or POI; we are gradually phasing them out.  (And despite most people will talk about "Brussels" about any point within the Brussels-Capital Region, as long as OSM in concerned, the name solely applies to one of the municipalities and not the one here.  This is Schaerbeek - Schaarbeek).

Have a nice day.
Dodko (2024-01-22 14:41:15+00:00): Samostatný rodinný dom sa značí
building=detached
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Ddetached
adresu som doplnil
ingwoski (2024-01-23 13:53:53+00:00): diky :) takze uz nemusim nic menit? ci to mam este nejako editovat?
Dodko (2024-01-23 13:55:58+00:00): Už to je v poriadku.
ingwoski (2024-01-23 13:57:25+00:00): super, dakujem
jeslop (2024-01-23 13:55:22+00:00): Hola ig5map. 

¿Cuál es la fuente para este nombre: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241872952#map=19/36.86223/30.97917?

Además, parece estar escrito incorrectamente.

Jesús López
Data Working Group
eggie (2024-01-22 08:32:29+00:00): Welkom bij OSM..

Zou de website niet ook aangepast moeten worden.
https://www.hotelheemskerk.nl/

Mvg
eggie
JeffreyBookunited (2024-01-22 08:39:16+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Bedankt! Ik heb de website ook aangepast.

Mvg,
Jeffrey
eggie (2024-01-22 09:30:22+00:00): 👍
GrabMY_ainayusof (2024-02-08 04:59:46+00:00): Hi Rayth. Good day.

I noticed an edit of this node was changed from no to private. The  access to this road is meant for resident with valid access card. Those who don't have access card must register to the post guard for security measure as per management request.

Since this map is being used for public purpose, I believe the correct access should be "no" in order to avoid confusing and frustration from the end user. Thanks and happy holiday.
rayth (2024-02-08 05:06:14+00:00): Hi ainayusof,

The general consensus on the use of access=* tag is:

access=private -> For places with access cards/special permission
access=no -> For places that nobody can physically go through

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Introductory_examples

How the end user want to interpret the tag is up to them.
GrabMY_ainayusof (2024-02-08 05:27:50+00:00): yes the definition itself is correct. but the context here is for resident who held access card and public user with no access card. the edits has cause Grab Navigation to choose the route resulting our end user had to make a detour because the lift gate is not accessible to them.
rayth (2024-02-08 05:37:11+00:00): Yes I understand. But as I mentioned earlier "How the end user (in this case Grab) want to interpret the tag is up to them". OpenStreetMap is community-edited map and the tagging should be based on local community consensus. Grab should not tag anyhow they want without the community consensus just because that's how Grab routing software interpret certain tag. Hence, we should consult the community first for the interpretation of the tag. 

Malaysia Telegram Community: https://t.me/OpenStreetMapsMalaysia
Syl (2024-01-31 09:30:37+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai corrigé le type du cabinet infirmier comme ce ne sont pas des docteurs.
mapperue (2024-03-06 16:41:37+00:00): Hi, tag amenity=car_repair is deprecated.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/64442479
More info here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcar_repair
Layft Greater (2024-03-07 12:49:33+00:00): Thanks. Fixed.
woodpeck_repair (2024-01-22 08:33:00+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 146537687.
Lezurex (2024-02-22 10:20:40+00:00): Hallo SelinaSmile,

80 auf einer etwas engeren Dorfstrasse mit Kurve? Kann ich mir nicht so recht vorstellen. Kannst du dies bitte nochmals nachprüfen?

Warst du bei deinen Änderungen an maxspeed hier auf OpenStreetMap jeweils tatsächlich vor Ort? Falls du dich einfach verklickt hast oder etwas am Editor nicht verstanden hast, darfst du hier oder bei der Schweizer OSM Community gerne auch Fragen stellen.

LG
Lezurex aka Lenny
NeisBot (2024-01-24 00:31:05+00:00): Hi ig5map 👋

your recent changeset has been marked due to a temporary or permanent block from further map edits. 

If you have any questions or if there's anything you'd like to discuss regarding the mapping, feel free to reach out! 

Best regards, 🤖

Details https://osm.org/user_blocks/15608
#ContributorHasBeenBlocked