piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2026-02-10 09:29:33+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
In general, accurate mapped.
You left quite a number of buildings unsquared. It is very difficult to map a rectangular accurate freehanded (mouse?). Thus, square each building with the Q key whyle still selected.
Best regards
HellMap (2026-03-16 11:34:20+00:00): Sveiki,

Ēkas nevajadzētu dzēst, kamēr tās redzamas ortofoto, ja neko citu to vietā neiezīmē. Jo pēc tam nav iespējams noteikt daudzus gadus, vai te ir neiezīmēta ēka un jebkurš cits to iezīmēs, kas bieži notiek. Te pat no kadastra vēl ēku kontūras nav noņemtas. Šeit arī adrešu punkti līdz ar ēkām nodzēsti (bots gan tos atjauno, bet vēsture elementiem pazūd). Un siena dienvidos šeit nemaz nav nojaukta.

Es atjaunoju.

Šādos gadījumos vislabāk lietot https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
rusjanis (2026-03-16 17:46:19+00:00): Sveiks, ēkas tur nav tagad pat zāle aug.  Jā dzēsu ēku, jo zināju ka bots adreses atjaunos. Siena tur arī nav ir žogs. https://mapillary.com/map/im/1189816752508223
HellMap (2026-03-16 18:08:33+00:00): Ēkas nav, bet ortofoto redzamas - tās kāds var atkal iezīmēt, ja atstāt kartē tukšu vietu. Daudz vietās tā pa jaunu tiek sazīmētas nojauktas ēkas, ceļi un viss kas.

Žogs ir gar ietvi, bet tikai līdz dienvidu sienai. Mapillary nevar redzēt uz sāniem; es pēc tam jaunākas bildes izlikšu. Es kartē atzīmēju to posmu.
HellMap (2026-04-06 09:59:34+00:00): Šis ir tas sienas posms, par kuru minēju: https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/hellphoto?&pKey=2151843558688976&focus=photo
rusjanis (2026-04-06 18:10:28+00:00): Jā, tiesa, žogs ir :) Bet ēkas nav.
Hung Tran 9x0 (2026-02-28 14:29:07+00:00): một đoạn đầu là ngõ 19 nguyễn văn lộc là đúng rồi, tôi không hiểu vì sao bạn lại xóa đi
VLD322 (2026-02-10 14:54:07+00:00): Olá — reparei que adicionou códigos postais como extensão do nome da rua em algumas partes da cidade de Jequi. Gostaria apenas de comentar, caso seja útil, que no OpenStreetMap, os códigos postais são normalmente mapeados como um valor da chave [addr:postcode](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:postcode), em vez de serem incluídos no nome da rua.

Ficaria extremamente grato se pudesse adotar esta abordagem daqui para a frente, pois ajuda a manter a consistência com a forma como os códigos postais são mapeados noutras cidades do Brasil.
Silvoney Constancio (2026-02-10 18:44:00+00:00): Ok. Trabalho nos Correios e sou responsável por manutenção das informações georreferenciais na cidade de Jequié. O objetivo de informar o CEP é facilitar a consulta por parte dos usuários do OpenStreetMap e garantir o correto endereçamento.
VLD322 (2026-02-10 19:27:48+00:00): Ok, agora compreendo. Muito obrigado pela resposta rápida e desejo-lhe uma excelente tarde.
santamariense (2026-03-17 00:14:32+00:00): Olá Caros Colegas,

Acabei notando também e não tem como não notar, pois o CEP não deve ir junto com o nome da rua. Cada um tem o seu campo.

Na tag name=* deve ir o nome e na tag postal_code=* deve ir o CEP.

addr:postcode também é o CEP, porém, neste caso, é para os receptores, mais precisamente para os endereços que têm aquele CEP.

Mais informações em: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:postal_code

Na verdade o que torna o dado de fato usável (por aplicações) é pôr na sua devida tag.

O fato é que o CEP deve ser separado do nome. Qualquer usuário experiente que bater o olho vai naturalmente ajustar os dados, cada um em seu lugar. Adicionar o CEP no nome da rua é mapear para que fique visualizável no mapa principal do OSM, porém, os verdadeiros e principais usuários desses dados, que são as aplicações, acabam não consumindo estes dados porque não estão na tag correta. Leia mais sobre como mapear para o renderizador não é uma boa prática em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Por outro lado, entendi que há demanda de visualização desses dados em mapa, e o CEP acaba ficando escondido no mapa padrão do OSM. Posso te ajudar a montar um mapa para visualizar esses dados no QGis. Há também a possibilidade de se criar um mapa específico para os CEPs da cidade, onde o usuário clica na rua e aparece o CEP usando o https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/ . Com ele, a gente pode colocar as ruas e, ao clicar numa rua, aparece para o usuário o CEP que ela tem. Creio que seja possível inclusive pesquisar qual rua tem um determinado CEP.

Fico a disposição para ajudar com criação de mapa no QGis ou no umap.

Bom mapeamentos a todos,

santamariense
eggie (2026-02-09 19:27:56+00:00): Hi.. Please use the present addressnode.
Gr eggie
NeisBot (2026-02-09 19:00:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13537550992 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Spa at Catamaran Resort"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-18 05:34:47+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178708548
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-04 00:07:39+00:00): Nuked SEO spam POI "The Catamaran Spa" explicitly cited as being sourced from Google Maps, and later vandalized by the original SEO spammer, in changeset 183617636

https://osm.org/changeset/183617636
Udarian (2026-02-09 19:49:22+00:00): This changeset has a dragged node in it, I have fixed the dragged node. The dragged node was node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9744499948 because it was moved north, and as it is connected to several ways (roads and footways), the shape (alignment) of those features also got changed, this lead to data issues as the shape was incorrect. This is a common and easy mistake to make so don't sweat it, but next time please try to avoid such issues. An easy way to do so in iD (the OSM editor that pops up when you click edit on the main OSM website) is to look out for error's that iD outputs. The wording for some of the common errors iD outputs when you have a dragged node is usually worded along the lines of "Road Name 1 crosses Sidewalk" or "Road Name 1 crosses Road Name 2". When these pop up in iD there will usually be UI elements in the issue box with common fixes, for dragged nodes you would ideally move the node back to its old location either by undoing to before the change that caused the issue or moving it manually. Usually any issues that exist on a feature in the changes you want to upload to OSM will pop up in a list in the uploading UI, you can click on these and it will take you to them so you can see if you can fix them. I have attached an example image below of what the upload UI may look like when these issues pop up from a dragged node https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Udarthegreat/public-sources/refs/heads/main/other/Screenshot%202026-02-09%20144645.png .

Happy Mapping,
Udar.
NikoNomas (2026-03-01 20:44:59+00:00): Sorry but I do not follow all of the technical details of what you describe above, and please excuse my ignorance, but I don't understand how all of that relates to me attempting to add the locale "Bike & Roll" - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13537701898

Perhaps instead of spending your time attempting to train us newbies through these comments, perhaps suggest a good introductory training OSM video/course?

By the way, I use the Android program called CoMaps to edit OSM, usually always upon confirming details in person, or immediately thereafter.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-12 04:55:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2825492741
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/352040243

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-12 05:45:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2825492741
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/352040243

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ChrissW-R1 (2026-02-14 22:22:13+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/5167973
NeisBot (2026-02-09 19:18:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/10874897272 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "outdoor furniture store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-18 05:34:48+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178708549
(No visible changes after review)
AurélienQ (2026-03-07 21:36:24+00:00): La Vmax de la section en voie sur dalle est à 170 sinon le balast est aspiré sur les rails.

Merci de te renseigner du pourquoi est ce que c'est ainsi avant de faire des conneries
AurélienQ (2026-03-07 21:37:25+00:00): Pardon pour mon vocabulaire
AurélienQ (2026-03-07 21:38:43+00:00): Merci pour ton travail,
Je m'excuse
SharpeSerana (2026-03-08 00:18:43+00:00): Bonjour,
Pour information, j'y suis passé en fin d'année dernière, et je peux t'assurer qu'on roule à 300 km/h à cet endroit. 
Pour avoir bossé sur la signalisation de cette ligne lorsqu'elle a été étendue jusqu'à Vendenheim, elle est bien prévue pour 300 km/h à Chauconin. Il y a eu historiquement un abaissement de la vitesse à 230 km/h pendant quelques années mais ça fait un bail que cette restriction de vitesse a été retirée.
SharpeSerana (2026-03-08 00:25:00+00:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2nTCr5spQY
Et voilà d'ailleurs une vidéo qui montre le passage à fond à Chauconin (timecode 21:30).
AurélienQ (2026-03-08 09:38:54+00:00): Autant pour moi, la personne qui m'avait donné cette info n'était donc pas à jour. Je lui faisait confiance car elle est du milieu, comme quoi...

Encore une fois je m'excuse, rien ne justifie mon vocabulaire. Et en plus la remarque que je t'ai faite j'aurais du l'appliquer avant...

Je corrige ma bêtise.
felipeeugenio (2026-02-09 19:52:35+00:00): Hola. buenos días.
Si un restaurant es Koreano, eso puede ir en cuisine= (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine).

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178327020
Yog Sot (2026-02-10 14:12:50+00:00): w obu kierunkach wymalowali?
db-ak (2026-02-10 14:36:14+00:00): Tak, na danych odcinkach
Yog Sot (2026-02-11 14:57:25+00:00): i w kierunku ronda jest pas rowerowy.. który jak oni zaprojektowali, że się z niego wjeżdża na DDR po lewej przed rondem? Czy się nie wjeżdża i się dojeżdża jezdnią do ronda? ;D
db-ak (2026-02-11 16:11:07+00:00): Nie ma wjazdu z prawego pasu na lewy dr przed rondem. Po prostu jezdnią bez żadnego wlotu w dr
Yog Sot (2026-02-11 17:42:40+00:00): w sumie prawidłowo, ale wow za takie nie drogo rowerowe zmiany. 
Jedyne co, zima jest tragedia, bo główną robotę w odśnieżaniu robią autka, a po zimie kwartał leży piach xD
NeisBot (2026-02-09 19:36:42+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 28 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1475926007 v1 | 15 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1475926006 v1 | 13 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/2323131465 v5
https://osm.org/node/4948054379 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178327272
NeisReview (2026-02-18 05:34:57+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178353148
https://osm.org/changeset/178387920
NeisBot (2026-02-09 19:39:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 16 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1475926007 v2 | 16 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13538299017 v2
https://osm.org/node/4948054380 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178327481
NeisReview (2026-02-18 05:34:58+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178353148
https://osm.org/changeset/178361526
Langlaeufer (2026-02-11 10:30:51+00:00): Ich hab jetzt die Rad/Fußwege vom der Holzwiesen auch eingezeichnet. 
Wenn du die Bürgersteige kurz vor der Straße enden lässt aber sidewalk:both=separate auf der gesamten Straße setzt, dann ist das Stück ohne separate Fußwege ggf. nicht mehr für Fußgänger navigierbar. sidewalk:both=separate könnte gleichbedeutend mit foot=use_sidepath interpretiert werden. Da war aber keine separate Verbindung zur Straße mehr eingezeichnet.
Grüße Langläufer
osmmapper222 (2026-02-11 21:38:29+00:00): Danke für die Erläuterung. So lernt man wieder dazu. 

Mit deiner Eintragung der Rad- und Fußwege entlagen den Holzwiesen ließen sich die Wege der Seitenstraßen nun auch durchziehen. Danke dafür.
Langlaeufer (2026-02-11 22:16:46+00:00): Ich würde immer mit den Hauptstraßen anfangen.
gabro00 (2026-02-09 21:24:20+00:00): Szia!
Ezeket a házszámokat nyugodtan rakhatod a bejárati ajtó pontjára; vagy ha nincs ajtó, húzd az ajtó helyére és rakd rá a megfelelő címkét.
Ma Rókuson megcsináltam, például: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10778619379
zsoooc (2026-02-10 13:36:51+00:00): Szia! Köszi a javaslatott, ezentúl így fogom csinálni.
gabro00 (2026-02-10 13:43:39+00:00): Majd a geometriára figyelj, hogy ne legyenek krumplik a házakból :)
Egyébként kösz a címeket, hiánypótló!
mike140 (2026-02-10 11:54:17+00:00): Для вирівнювання будинків натискайте Q
mike140 (2026-02-10 12:22:19+00:00): Додали назву вулиці до будинків. А де сама вулиця? Назва не прописана. До речі, що до правил позначення назв почитайте тут: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B8
porfiriopaiz (2026-02-09 22:20:38+00:00): Hola J00SECI,

¿Podrías abstenerte de realizar cualquier tipo de contribución que implique la eliminación de datos existentes en el mapa?

Hay mejores formas de contribuir con OSM; por ejemplo, agregando nuevos elementos al mapa sin necesidad de eliminar o modificar lo que ya existe y sin entorpecer las contribuciones de otros mapeadores.

Espero una respuesta de tu parte.

Saludos,

Porfirio Páiz
Taya_S (2026-02-10 08:43:27+00:00): Hi, I see that you deleted a lot of `
construction:railway:etcs=2` tags here. Does this mean that this railway no longer has any etcs signalling?
SharpeSerana (2026-02-10 10:19:47+00:00): Hi,
This part of the line will not be fitted with ETCS level 2. It's only being installed where TVM300 is installed currently, so it will start at Brie Comte Robert.
eggie (2026-02-09 21:10:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Gebruik de al bestaande adresnodes om op bij te taggen. Dus geen adressen zelf aanmaken.
Het adres van de huisartsenpost heb je helaas verwijderd.
Hier je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=178329270
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-09 21:18:51+00:00): Adres huisarts hersteld
eggie (2026-02-09 21:21:55+00:00): Bedrijven samengevoegd met bestaande adresnodes.
jaa007 (2026-02-11 20:05:56+00:00): Dankjewel, had dit niet op die manier begrepen vanuit de walkthrough. Zal daar in t vervolg rekening mee houden.
NeisBot (2026-02-09 20:45:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12845193733 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Wellness Center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-18 05:34:48+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178708550
(No visible changes after review)
Svalbard (2026-02-12 11:32:58+00:00): Hallo Peppi95, welche Quelle hast Du für die Änderungen/Ergänzungen der Hausnummern genutzt? Beim Industrieweg in Oldendorf hast Du die Hausnr. von 3 auf 1a geändert. Die Folge ist, dass es nun keine Hausnr. 3 mehr gibt, aber es gibt 3a. Das erscheint nicht logisch. Für den Neubau Ecke Haferkamp/Achter Hoef hast Du 2a vergeben. joscheele, der das Gebäude vor 1 Monat erfasst hat, hat dazu folgendes vermerkt: "Neues Mehrfamilienhaus. Ob Haferkamp, oder Achter Hoef wird sich herausstellen.". Wenn Du jetzt 2a vergibst, dann gehört das Gebäude zum Achter Hoef. addr:street=Achter Hoef hast Du aber nicht eingetragen. Gruß Svalbard
user_11450747 (2026-02-12 11:43:42+00:00): Hallo Svalbard,

die Hausnummer im Industriweg habe ich geändert, weil dort eine Änderung der Hausnummern stattgefunden hat. 1a ist vor Ort auch so gekennzeichnet und im Geoportal so vermerkt. Hausnummer 3a "müsste" jetzt eigentlich die 3 sein, da bin ich mir aber nicht genau sicher. Der Neubau Achter Hoef/Haferkamp erhält die Zufahrt über die Straße Achter Hoef. Die Zuordnung der Straße habe ich wohl aus Versehen vergessen.
Svalbard (2026-02-12 13:24:53+00:00): Hallo Peppi95, vielen Dank für Deine Antwort. Wo kann man etwas über die Änderung von Hausnrn. in Oldendorf nachlesen? Gibt es da öffentliche Protokolle der Gemeindevertretung? Die Zuordnung der Straße (Achtern Hoef) könntest Du dann ja noch nachholen. Ein wichtiger Hinweis: Aus dem Geoprtal S-H dürfen keine Daten nach OpenStreetMap übernommen werden. Ein Tipp: Häuser kann man in iD mit der Taste „q“ rechtwinklig machen. Gruß Svalbard
Svalbard (2026-02-10 20:23:07+00:00): Hallo Peppi95, trägt nur das von Dir bearbeitete Wegstück den Namen „Nuttelner Weg“? Das liegt mittendrin. Ist irgendwie komisch. Lt. Sitzungsunterlage der Gem. Huje vom 18.11.2025 scheint der Name ab der K 62 (Lohende) zu gelten. Dort steht aber leider nicht wie weit (bis Nutteln?). Gleiches gilt für den Stücksweg. Gilt der Name bis er auf den Nuttelner Weg trifft oder nur innerhalb von Huje? Gruß Svalbard
Svalbard (2026-02-10 21:10:45+00:00): Hallo Peppi95, ich habe noch einmal in die Daten geschaut. Du hast den Straßennamen ab der K62 eingetragen. Sorry! Gruß Svalbard
ChrissW-R1 (2026-02-14 22:22:09+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/5167973
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:42:37+00:00): thanks for a fix!
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-03-22 03:12:52+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن شخصية / عشوائية / غير صحيحة للخريطة
eggie (2026-02-09 21:42:14+00:00): Peobeer svp bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnodes. 
Mvg
eggie
Norbert Dichter (2026-02-09 21:24:35+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178330782
kapazao (2026-02-10 14:51:14+00:00): Hola, voy a revertir esto y corregirlo, ya que has puesto toda la presa como una central hidroeléctrica y se ha liado un follón de multipolígono difícil de corregir que no sé por qué hiciste así.
Sabiendo que está ahí trataré de corregirla bien y es mejor que si no tienes claro cómo hacer esto tan solo lo comentes en la nota y que lo haga alguien que sepa o te pueda comentar cómo hacerlo bien.
Un saludo
M4ciej (2026-02-09 21:27:15+00:00): // review not needed
Rainero (2026-03-16 17:17:01+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179962439
(unzulässige Quelle)
NeisBot (2026-02-09 21:39:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/5554840321 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Consigna de maletas automatizada"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Consigna de maletas automatizada"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-18 05:34:51+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178708552
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-02-09 21:39:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/5554840321 v6

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Consigna de maletas automatizada"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Consigna de maletas automatizada"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-18 05:34:51+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178708552
Taya_S (2026-02-12 12:42:54+00:00): Reverted data imported from Google

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178456174
Taya_S (2026-02-12 12:42:55+00:00): Reverted data imported from Google

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178456174
Dezza (2026-02-10 13:16:14+00:00): Hello, if I'm reading this change right, I think this change removes the ability to turn right from Broadway onto Marine Road East. Is that intentional?

PS Thanks for all the updates you've been doing around Morecambe recently :)
iMacThere4iAm (2026-02-11 22:57:29+00:00): That's not intentional, and I'll fix it!
Dezza (2026-02-12 09:58:49+00:00): Awesome, thank you
Taya_S (2026-02-12 12:42:56+00:00): Reverted data imported from Google

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178456174
FajrAl (2026-06-03 11:54:59+00:00): No need to name them with numbers
rskedgell (2026-02-10 11:00:07+00:00): I'll see if anything has changed after Land Registry update INSPIRE (first Sunday of the month).