piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Xvtn (2024-04-04 16:25:54+00:00): Huh, interesting. I thought that building to the north was just someone's house.

Just a side note that unfortunately we can't directly use Google Maps to improve OSM. (More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google#Google_Maps_terms_of_use) - But, I think it's fine to use Google to find and navigate somewhere, then once we see it in person, add it to OSM. :) But I think you can leave this here and just double-check that it's correct once you get there, like you say!

Anyway, thanks for your contributions and thanks for clarifying on this!
pitfire (2024-03-27 07:16:11+00:00): Hallo Flizi,
bitte für Teilgebäude zur gleichen Adresse keine zweite Hs.Nr. usw erfassen.
D. h., die Hausnummern beziehen sich in Deutschland erst einmal grundsätzlich auf Grundstücke
Eine Aufteilung kann über "building:part" 
erfolgen.
Gebäudeumrisse für den allgemeinen Bereich eines komplexen Gebäudes und Gebäudeteile.
Kevlarpeters (2024-03-19 16:30:25+00:00): This looks like a sidewalk to me. I don't think I'd want to use it but it looks raised from street level and it leads to other sidewalks.
pitfire (2024-03-27 05:36:29+00:00): Hi Flizi,
hier hast Du aus dem Container des DRK einen Allesfresser gemacht. (recycling:clothes zusammen mit Altglascontainer, 2 Stück (weiß, grün, braun)
Schau einfach mal auf: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=recycling?uselang=de
tom_yorados (2024-03-19 16:49:51+00:00): Hi,

den westnordost-link lieber nicht in die Tags einfügen. Die Fotos werden nach einer Weile gelöschht:
"Ja, die werden da hochgeladen und solange gespeichert, bis die Notiz geschlossen wird. Danach werden sie gelöscht. Zurzeit liegen auf dem Server 2500 Photos, 2500 wurden bereits wieder gelöscht." 
von hier:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/streetcomplete-und-notizen-mit-photos/87816/4
conrad_heimbold2 (2024-03-19 16:52:45+00:00): Gibt ja noch den Link zum Facebook-Post, mit mehreren Fotos. Der Facebook-Post wird eher nicht gelöscht, denke ich.
iandees (2024-03-19 18:30:25+00:00): 🌯🌯🌯
pitscheplatsch (2024-03-19 17:55:53+00:00): Hi deniz9, welcome to OSM.

May we know the source of your mapping activities? Thanks.
olo81 (2024-03-19 17:23:50+00:00): to nie nazwa tylko opis, do poprawy
eserte (2024-03-19 20:31:38+00:00): smoothness=bad in der Charlottenstraße bezweifle ich. Das wäre ja genau so schlecht wie eine typische Fahrbahn mit Großsteinpflaster, und das ist es hier wirklich nicht.

Es gibt ja auch "intermediate".
thom_bike_bln (2024-03-19 21:52:51+00:00): Es gibt da einige sehr fiese Stellen, aber nur punktuell. Du hast recht, ingesamt dann doch eher intermediate. Werde ich ändern, danke für den Hinweis.
thom_bike_bln (2024-03-19 21:53:09+00:00): Beispiel: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=241571958830683
olo81 (2024-03-19 18:18:41+00:00): Tu też nazwa opisowa, tagowanie mówi że to park linowy, wystarczy "Lina Adrena"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
olo81 (2024-03-19 17:27:37+00:00): footway=sidewalk używamy do oznaczania chodników wzdłuż drogi, do poprawy
mweper (2024-03-20 00:13:04+00:00): ¿Qué velocidad está permitida (maxspeed)? ¿Hacía qué dirección mira el dispositivo (direction)? A qué sentido de circulación afecta el radar (relation)?
27sur26 (2024-03-24 23:21:48+00:00): Agregué los detalles faltantes. Cree la relación usando los nodos existentes de la ruta en lugar de crear nuevos, ¿está bien o hay que ajustarlo más al ejemplo de la wiki?
mweper (2024-03-25 01:15:35+00:00): Perfecto. Sólo reemplazaría el miembro "from" de la relación por el nodo en el cruce con calle Ombú. Es decir, añadiría más distancia entre el radar (device) y el inicio del aviso de radar (from), por lo general a la altura donde se ubica el cartel vial de aviso del radar. Es para que se tenga más tiempo de frenado.
Frans S (2024-03-21 12:59:01+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, You often included the shadow of the building into your mappings

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148872278
olo81 (2024-03-19 17:26:23+00:00): wykluczające się tagowanie, footway=sidewalk używamy do chodników wzdłuż drogi 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:footway=sidewalk?uselang=pl
Mariusz_Z (2024-03-19 17:39:40+00:00): Czy zmiana na "ścieżka dla pieszych" będzie odpowiednia ?
olo81 (2024-03-19 17:43:42+00:00): highway=path plus surface=* jeśli wiesz jaka nawierzchnia
olo81 (2024-03-19 17:48:39+00:00): aa i tagowanie  bicycle też trzeba odpowiednio dodawać. Nie dajemy  dowolnie bicycle=yes. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery
Xvtn (2024-03-20 22:36:28+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great! The only issue I saw is that Ash Springs Apartments outer boundary area was tagged with building=apartments, which means that the entire area is one big building. (I went ahead and fixed that.)
Other than that, everything looks super. Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contributions!
ivanbranco (2024-03-20 20:21:41+00:00): Hi DinahMG,

this editor (communecter.org) seems to have some problems. It creaded a bunch of empty tags: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/11745951637

do you have any idea of the reason? I never heard of this editor before
gurglypipe (2024-03-20 10:08:20+00:00): Heya, good to see you doing more work on the roads around Fleetwood :)

This change looks like it’s removing valid data just to make the default map rendering look different — assuming that roundabout name was correct? Editing for the renderer is not recommended: see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer

If the roundabout name is being rendered in an unhelpful place, a better fix for that is to file an issue against the default map rendering style (https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto) to improve how all roundabout names are rendered.

Does that make sense and fit with what you were trying to achieve? Ta
WestWyreWanderer (2024-03-20 11:26:51+00:00): Hi, there were a lot of dreadfully inaccurate, inadequate and out of date mapping in Fleetwood. The roundabout you mentioned had all its circular component ways named Denham Way Roundabout which I believe should be left with no name (unless I'm wrong). I have no idea whether that roundabout has a name; my feeling was that it had just been named arbitarily after one of the side roads.

Thanks for the suggested guidance, I'll check that out. 

Matt
gurglypipe (2024-03-22 10:34:30+00:00): It does look like ‘Denham Way Roundabout’ is a correct name — it’s mentioned in official news about road changes around Fleetwood, like https://www.gov.uk/government/news/safer-new-route-for-cyclists-and-pedestrians-near-fleetwood

I think the name should be added back.
WestWyreWanderer (2024-03-22 11:29:48+00:00): Well found. I must have mis-remembered guidance from somewhere else.
gurglypipe (2024-03-22 11:46:30+00:00): No worries, thanks for re-adding them and for your detailed edits in the area :)

For anyone coming across this in future, the names were re-added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149008655
tekim (2024-03-25 23:39:56+00:00): Hello, Thanks for editing the map.  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Street View when editing OpenStreetMap due to Google's terms of use.
tekim (2024-03-25 23:40:52+00:00): This is being reverted because it used Google Street View, which is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149153458
pitscheplatsch (2024-03-19 18:00:51+00:00): Hi FatPossum, welcome to OSM.

When can we expect to see the new trails?
FatPossum (2024-03-19 18:52:37+00:00): As soon as I can figure out how to import the new trails.
FatPossum (2024-03-20 17:29:11+00:00): pitscheplatsch,
Do you have any idea when edits "fully update"?  I have edited the "old" trails to delete/modify sections.
I also imported and then traced the current/new trail segments. I'm just not 100% certain I've done it all correctly.  The traced segments are not showing up when I go to OSM.  I was kind of assuming it takes a day or so, but this is my first time using OSM so I'm trying to catch up.
SomeoneElse (2024-03-30 12:39:18+00:00): I'm not pitscheplatsch, but:
Generally speaking, the rate at which map tiles update depends on the map you're looking at,  the zoom level, and often your local browser cache.
For map tiles in the default layer at www.openstreetmap.org , changed high zoom tiles get rendered on the fly, with low zoom tiles currently done daily.
If you're not seeing something after a few days it's probably a browser cache issue.
If you've got any more questions (and I'm sure you'll have lots) I'd suggest asking at https://community.openstreetmap.org .
Best Regards, 
Andy
pitscheplatsch (2024-03-19 18:01:06+00:00): Hi FatPossum, welcome to OSM.

When can we expect to see the new trails?
silversurfer83 (2024-03-20 07:59:18+00:00): Hello Scotman100 :)

since your edit scrolled through my watchlist I'd like to ask a tiny favor of you:
AFAIK your app Go Map!! allows you to set a comment before you upload your changes so I'd like to ask you to read
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
and please include a nice comment with your future changes.
Thank you for considering.

safe travels and happy mapping
silversurfer83
Mashin (2024-03-19 23:12:50+00:00): Hi,
When editing objects, please don't delete and re-draw them. Drag the nodes instead to adjust the shape.
Thanks

PS
You can read more about golf course mapping on wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls
olo81 (2024-03-19 18:02:57+00:00): czy na tych ścieżkach są znaki c16? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway=footway?uselang=pl
Mariusz_Z (2024-03-19 18:05:16+00:00): Nie ma żadnych znaków. Więc jak to zakwalifikować ?
olo81 (2024-03-19 18:08:04+00:00): Należy rozważyć użycie highway=path lub highway=cycleway, jeśli nie jest ona ograniczona wyłącznie do pieszych.
olo81 (2024-03-19 18:08:47+00:00): to cytat z wiki które podlinkowałem wcześniej
olo81 (2024-03-19 18:40:55+00:00): Widzę że wszystkie ścieżki w parku będą do weryfikacji
Mariusz_Z (2024-03-19 18:58:10+00:00): Dodałem sporo ścieżek, których brakowało na mapie. Może ktoś to lepiej zweryfikuje
Mariusz_Z (2024-03-19 19:01:22+00:00): W najbliższym czasie poprawię też położenie ławek, bo w chwili obecnej większość nie zgadza się z rzeczywistością.
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-19 21:39:15+00:00): Do not partially overlap areas...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148874275
literan (2024-03-19 18:10:48+00:00): добрый день. Просьба не дублировать поликлиники. Теги должны стоять или на точке, или на полигоне (территории, что более целесообразно). Поправлю (просьба не править сейчас, а то будут конфликты)
sndlchngd (2024-03-19 19:41:51+00:00): Добрый. Хорошо, спасибо за заметку. Приводил их к общему виду и выбрал для него наиболее полный из существовавших на тот момент вариантов, поэтому так получилось.
Думаю надо будет ознакомиться с полезными ссылками в вашем профиле.
totera (2024-04-19 22:43:48+00:00): Ciao ross-map, un nodo con tourism=attraction senza indicare di che si tratta non è molto significativo, e inoltre Castel di Luco era già mappato come castello
ross-map (2024-04-22 15:36:04+00:00): Mi scuso ma non avevo visto che Castel di Luco era già mappato come castello
flohoff (2024-03-19 18:22:22+00:00): Moin,
das ist jetzt ein random changeset von den vielen die du hier gemacht hast über alle möglichen Stellplätze.

Das ist ja ein massenedit - Ist der irgendwo im Forum diskutiert worden?

Flo
Nakaner (2024-04-04 09:45:22+00:00): siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149488066
Leo Slager (2024-03-20 00:45:57+00:00): dag Luc,
De Bieshorstlaan was correct getagd als een highway:unclassified.
Je hebt er een path van gemaakt met allerlei foutmeldingen als gevolg.
Het is een weg met een bussluis en volgens de verkeersborden rijden er  lijnbussen en landbouwvoertuigen.
En dat betekent dat het nooit als highway:path op de kaart kan staan.
Ik zet unclassified even terug.
Luc Heres (2024-03-20 09:05:55+00:00): Goedemorgen Leo.
Prima actie. Ik had een wandelpad toegevoegd maar had daarbij niet in de gaten dat ik de classificatie van de Bieshorst ook wijzigde.  Dat was niet de bedoeling. 
Vriendelijke groeten 
Luc Heres 
Eefde
Frans S (2024-03-21 12:30:23+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Very inaccurate mapped buildings.
95 % of the buildings not squared.
Connected nodes of buildings to a road. 
Misplaced a road.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148875991
Patchanka (2024-03-22 17:25:52+00:00): bonjour
les éléments ajoutés existent-ils sur le terrain ? J'ai un gros doute :
- maison nommée "Villa snt" non visible sur photo aérienne 2023
- poste cyclable non visible sur photo aérienne 2023
- lac non visible sur photo aérienne 2023

Merci de me confirmer cela, sans quoi ces éléments seront supprimés
FrançoiseR (2024-03-26 13:35:28+00:00): Bonjour Patchanka
Cette contrib fait partie d'exercices au programme des cours de seconde en Sciences Numériques et Technologie... Il y en a eu un  certain nombre ces jours-ci à Marseille (repérées via whodidit, avec pas mal d'erreurs et de plaisanteries) mais ça va être un phénomène national  comme les années précédentes...
J'en ai corrigées quelques unes dont celles de ce changeset.
Cordialement
Patchanka (2024-03-27 18:28:46+00:00): hélas oui je sais bien.
Je voulais quand même donner une chance de dialoguer avant de revert...
Merci pour les corrections
Metzor (2024-03-20 23:12:19+00:00): Hallo filbro,

Ein Qualitätssicherungstool hat mich zu deinem Änderungssatz geleitet, weil er leider das Routing kaputt macht:
https://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=19/49.47553/8.68945/standard&lonlats=8.68974,49.475556;8.689298,49.475492&profile=car-eco

Diese Abbiegerelation ist falsch:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17364376/history

Magst du das reparieren?

Außerdem hast du die Kreuzung auf eine eher unübliche Art gemappt. Vermutlich hattest du gute Absichten und wolltest den Spurverlauf möglichst genau abbilden. Das hat leider einige Nachteile, wenn ich den folgenden Thread richtig verstanden habe:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-von-kreuzungen-mit-verkehrsinsel/109144/11
Aber unüblich muss ja nicht falsch sein ;-)

Schöne Grüße und fröhliches Mappen
Metzor
filbro (2024-03-21 08:17:23+00:00): Hey Metzor,
danke für deinen Hinweis!
Mit diesen Abbiegebeschränkungen muss man auch erst mal warm werden ;-)
Hab den Fehler korrigiert, jetzt sollte es passen.

Und wegen „unüblich“… Ja stimmt wohl, aber es spiegelt eben die Realität etwas besser wieder (wie du ja schon bemerkt hast, gute Absichten etc.). Zumindest habe ich jetzt daraus gelernt wie man es wirklich richtig macht bzw. auf was man ganz genau achten muss.

Welches Qualitätssicherungstool hat dich denn auf die Spur gebracht wenn ich fragen darf?

Viele Grüße zurück,
Filip
Metzor (2024-03-21 08:48:59+00:00): Hi Filip,

Danke fürs Reparieren :-)

Ich schaue mir die brouter suspects Meldungen für Baden-Württemberg an:
https://brouter.de/brouter/suspects/daily/Germany/BadenWrttemberg/new

Es gibt aber noch weitere Übersichten für andere (Bundes)Länder.

Viele Grüße
Metzor
filbro (2024-03-21 21:16:58+00:00): Hi nochmal,
den guten BRouter kannte ich, aber nicht dessen suspects feature, interessant!
Was mir noch nicht so ganz klar ist, ist die Frage was es mit den due dates auf der watchlist auf sich hat. Was passiert wenn ein due date abläuft?

Grüße, Filip
Metzor (2024-03-22 05:11:41+00:00): Hey Filip,

Man kann suspects für eine ausgewählte Zeit stummschalten. Das ist bei Baustellen praktisch. Oder wenn man einen andern gebeten hat, etwas zu reparieren. Wenn die Zeit abgelaufen ist, poppt das suspect wieder auf der normalen Übersicht auf.

Viele Grüße
Metzor
AndersAndersson (2024-03-24 12:41:11+00:00): Hej!
Kul att du lägger in skoterleder i OpenStreetMap!
Tänk dock på att eftersom skoterleden inte går på kraftledningen så ska den ritas som en separat sträcka.
Jag har ändrat detta för just denna ändringsuppsättning.
Robin Elfström (2024-03-24 13:12:57+00:00): Hej Anders! Det är första gången jag ritar och man får många förslag hur man ska rita. vägar går bra att tagg snowmobile men inte kraftledning för den går i luften om jag förstår dig rätt?
AndersAndersson (2024-03-24 13:27:08+00:00): Hej!
Det stämmer bra som du skriver. Generellt kan man tänka att om man befinner sig på en väg så kan man vilja navigera från denna väg till en annan väg, en skoterled eller något liknande. Då ska dessa sträckor dela noder.
Sedan finns det annat som ska sitta ihop med andra av samma slag, men inte med vägar. T.ex. kraftledningar och kommungränser. Man kan inte svänga av från vägen och in på kommungränsen.
Är det en stig eller en liten skogsväg som på vintern används till skoterled sätter man skotertaggarna direkt på den. Är det en stor väg som plogas går förmodligen skoterleden bredvid vägen och då ritar man den som en separat sträcka med skotertaggar.

Tack för att du hjälper till att göra kartan bättre!
AndersAndersson (2024-03-24 13:28:21+00:00): Ett tips kan vara att hålla in alt-knappen när man t.ex. ritar en skoterled bredvid en kraftledning, då slipper man att noden snäpper dit.
SekeRob (2024-03-29 12:13:04+00:00): Hi,
Finally got round to start cutting up large member count forests in your region with my 'repair' account. This one was 713 members, now 4 ways, the largest 243 where the recommended is a maximum of 300.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/957743/history/202

The one that was 1683 members has already lost several sections, the original has about 1100 left but needs some more studying how to proceed further as I don't want to cross thru inner areas of e.g. bare rock and scree that still need mapping.

ciao
Rob
CCCGGG (2024-03-31 07:33:37+00:00): Wow, great job! Well done! Thanks! :-)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-05 02:16:36+00:00): Hello!

Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree" (or "Arbre", in French).

So for buildings it is not needed to put Batiment as their name.

Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1264237668 is specifically named with such name?

Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.

And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
NeisBot (2024-03-24 12:40:43+00:00): Hello FW_Diespeck, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments \n
Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
ivanbranco (2024-03-23 19:51:53+00:00): Ciao lookatfra,

Google Street View non é una fonte compatibile col database OSM. Sapresti indicarmi per quale modifica é stato utilizzato?
lookatfra (2024-03-28 15:27:45+00:00): Ciao,
mi dispiace ma non sapevo che Google Street View non fosse una fonte compatibile con OSM. In ogni caso, uso Street View sempre e solo per avere maggior precisione nel posizionamento di tratte e nodi che ho già verificato da fonti disponibili in JOSM o da PGT dei vari comuni e/o province. Quindi in questo caso ricordo di averlo usato a un passaggio a livello di una delle stazioni per avere maggior precisione nel posizionamento delle banchine in quella stazione.
fritzmimi (2024-03-23 08:38:01+00:00): Hallo glibbertorsten,
mit der Änderung der B2 im Bereich von Michendorf bin ich nicht zufrieden. Schau doch mal in die Definition von 'Trunk' ! Hier ist zwar eine Kranftfahrstraße im Sinne der Straßenverkehrsordnung, aber keine KREUTZUNGSFREIE Schnellstraße.
M f G
Fritzmimi
glibbertorsten (2024-03-23 10:10:17+00:00): Hi! Danke für den Hinweis! Ich hab jetzt zum ersten Mal verstanden, was der Unterschied wirklich bedeutet. Und wenn ich in JOSM Schnellstraße auswähle, dann wird wohl automatisch trunk vergeben. Ich hab jetzt noch explizit für Fahrrad und Fußgänger gesperrt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149044138. So ists richtig, oder?
fritzmimi (2024-03-26 20:49:49+00:00): So sollte es sein ! Ich nehme an, das sich die Darstellung noch ändern wird.
glibbertorsten (2024-03-26 20:52:28+00:00): Ansonsten STRG+F5, dann werden alle Kacheln frisch gezogen
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-21 06:07:15+00:00): Note that images uploaded by mappers and hosted at westnordost.de server contain photos taken for OSM notes. But this images are not kept permanently, so adding it for example to image=* is not useful. Upload your photos to Wikimedia Commons if you want to keep them - note that uploading photos made by someone else needs a license assignment.

See also https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/9302 and https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/22397
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2024-03-21 07:05:39+00:00): De acuerdo. Tomo nota.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-19 19:37:29+00:00): wait, problem is with opposite direction - overly unspecific link
Frans S (2024-03-21 12:56:38+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark about mapping highways
How to decide when a trace is a path or an unclassified highway
First, look what they connect.  Houses, settlements, villages. Then measure the width of that trace.
In iDeditor 

Shortcut : Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle  opens measurement panel
Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.
If a trace is max 2 meters wide, tag it as a path.
Wider and connect hamlets, houses and villages should be tagged as unclassified.
Tag residential in urban areas (villages, towns)
In JOSM, use the measure tab, or draw a circle (round building, shortcut Alt-Z when the building plugin is installed)) between the shoulders of a trace and read the distance on the lower toolbar. (remove the circle after that)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
This is mentioned about tracks on the
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routing#Routing_considerations

Quote: Tracks are roads of agricultural purpose. They usually connect fields to farms. The surface sometimes makes them inaccessible for regular cars, or at least limits the speeds to a very slow pace. Tracks should always be avoided for through-going traffic or within urban areas.
All traces in farmland can be tagged as 'track' but is not essential on this project.
Important are roads connecting settlements, houses and villages.
Best regards and keep mapping