piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
envagyokabela (2025-11-13 15:20:46+00:00): Hali! Láttam kiszedted az url:kozterkep-et. Azért rakodom oda, mert láttam ebben a changesetben ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155276745 ), hogy valakik úgy döntöttek, kell az. Csak gondoltam, szólok, de tégy úgy, ahogy gondolod. Egyébként a "Matrix chat" csak most júliusig megy vissza, szóval nem is találtam meg, mivel érveltek, és a wikire sem jutott el az infó.
envagyokabela (2025-11-13 15:37:57+00:00): Haha! Hagyd figyelmen kívül az előző megjegyzést! Nem vettem észre, hogy rámszóltak, már nem kell: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174483965

:p
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-24 06:08:49+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised Editing & import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176338212
NeisBot (2025-11-13 09:06:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-13 09:06:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "House cleaning service in Pittsburgh"
NeisReview (2025-11-18 14:04:34+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174603998
Yog Sot (2025-11-13 18:55:49+00:00): ale uzyutkownik nie sprawdził czy dot roweru?
rempshaener (2025-11-13 17:47:30+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Du hast als Quelle den Bayern Atlas angegeben.
Leider sind die Daten für OSM nicht nutzbar, die Lizenz https://www.ldbv.bayern.de/produkte/nutzungsrechte_kosten/nutzungsrechte.html ist nicht kompatibel.
So leid es mir tut: bitte lösche die Daten zeitnah wieder, sonst könnte es zu Problemen kommen.
Viele Grüße
pdKURIER-cf (2025-11-14 07:55:10+00:00): Hallo, 
vielen Dank für das schnelle Feedback und den Hinweis. Ich habe die Änderung entfernt. 

Viele Grüße
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-14 07:20:06+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13301141902
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/417894784

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
CRCulver (2025-11-16 19:28:30+00:00): Why did you restore a highway=crossing tag to this node:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7246160566

Areal imagery shows no formal crossing here. These tags do not need to be added to intersections of sidewalks and driveways (or similar service ways) where there are no markings.
PedestrianMapping_StealthMapper (2025-11-17 08:43:36+00:00): I restored the highway=crossing tag under the assumption that the intersection implied pedestrian priority, but I understand your concern. Thanks for the clarification
CRCulver (2025-11-17 20:42:21+00:00): It would be good if you could go back through your previous edits and remove any crossing=tags you have added at the intersection of sidewalks and service ways. Especially if you are a part of a corporate mapper, just leaving such edits is going to create a lot of ill-will.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
Rukkhadevata (2025-11-20 10:50:33+00:00): 您好，自治州本身是不需要一个place=city节点的（只需要代表区域的place=region），而自治州的首府城市则是比照地级市升为capital=5的，这是长期以来的惯例，也可以在相关wiki条目中找到：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/China/Boundaries
盖子哥 (2025-11-20 10:56:36+00:00): 好的，也就是说黄海洲不做渲染是正常的
Rukkhadevata (2025-11-20 11:00:06+00:00): 是的，自治州不用渲染，因为它不像县有县城，而只有“州政府驻地”，纯粹是一个跟“青海省”一样的区域型地名
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:34:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
SomeoneElse (2025-12-29 22:55:27+00:00): Hello,
You are arguing about whether https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/15921137 should be secondary or tertiary.  Please explain why you think it should be secondary (or tertiary), and (importantly) why you think that your view has the backing of the community in Poland.  Please link to the relevant section of the Polish forum or wiki to support your case.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
SomeoneElse (2025-12-29 22:55:57+00:00): Witaj,
Spierasz się o to, czy https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/15921137 powinien być mapą drugorzędną, czy trzeciorzędną. Wyjaśnij, dlaczego uważasz, że powinien być mapą drugorzędną (lub trzeciorzędną) i (co ważne), dlaczego uważasz, że Twój pogląd cieszy się poparciem społeczności w Polsce. Podaj link do odpowiedniej sekcji polskiego forum lub wiki, aby uzasadnić swoje stanowisko.
Z poważaniem,
Andy Townsend, w imieniu Grupy Roboczej ds. Danych OSM
pavvv (2025-12-30 07:37:34+00:00): There wasn't a forum discussion as I always believed it could be resolved in the comments but unfortunately neither maraf24 nor maro21 want to comply and present answers to my questions about their questionable arguments. I could however bring the discussion to Discord or the OSM forum.
SomeoneElse (2025-12-30 12:49:03+00:00): Yes - please do raise this specific issue in the forum.
Also, if you find yourself in a situation like https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/15921137 please NEVER continue the revert war.  At best, you'll find yourself blocked for a period of time.  You're actually very lucky that I did not do this this time.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:38:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:34:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
Steine42 (2025-12-02 15:14:31+00:00): Hi Sahar Shadi,
kann es sein, dass dies eine Dublette von 2048246044 ist? Lt. Mapilary ist rechts von Eingang 31, 33 ein Zigarettenautomat, nicht aber zwischen 29 und 31.
Steine42 (2025-12-16 17:49:47+00:00): Hi Sahar Shadi,
es scheint nicht nur eine Dublette zu dem schon länger von @opensourcefriend eingetragenen Knoten 2048246044 zu sein, sondern auch eine Dublette des von dir selbst eingetragenen Knoten 13288521747.
bkil (2025-11-23 11:41:47+00:00): Hello. You have modified the position of the tobacco shop to a position that does not match its physical place. We also place the position of a big POI (such as Príma) near the entrance, not in the middle. Note that using Google Maps as a source is against the terms of service of both Google and OpenStreetMap. Please discuss further before making modifications.
bkil (2025-11-23 12:04:54+00:00): https://privatebin.net/?3f857d48b5a22655#3W2Fr5GBzTL8oFk98hC4dh7UeirZwCDGj4WW7eWFSm4A
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-24 06:20:55+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised Editing & import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176338499
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:44:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321630 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - United Kingdom
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
Supaplex (2025-11-14 10:57:30+00:00): Can you be more specific about what you edit? It can make the review process by local community much easier.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174598213
Kees 59 (2025-11-13 10:45:05+00:00): Oops, beschrijving vergeten. Alsnog:
Remove: Gesloopte gebouwen. Add: landuse.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:43:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321545 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Peru
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:35:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:43:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321553 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Poland
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
oba510 (2025-11-23 10:06:10+00:00): Hi, fyi you broke the member ordering on a bus route relation here when you split Gateway Boulevard (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19701963). (it's been fixed)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-12-09 20:42:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175731398 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes prior to redaction
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
ratrun (2025-11-14 04:35:05+00:00): This changeset just duplicated existing features. Please stop uploading such crap data!

Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174631793#map=14/45.83518/-0.78679&layers=VN
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-25 15:10:39+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2270857907/history has rooms = 0 that was added in this edit
What was meant by this? That this object has no rooms? Seems surprising here
yswa (2025-11-26 08:56:31+00:00): Hi, actually, I didn't fill in that information, I'll add it!
(Nice your OSM SVG and 3D map project !)
NeisBot (2025-11-13 11:21:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-13 11:21:41+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Estate planning attorneys office"
NeisReview (2025-11-18 14:04:09+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174635728
Ryccardo (2025-11-13 11:42:34+00:00): Accidentally combined 3 changesets

Faenza - Mens (2025.7)
Imola - PalaGenius (2025.9)
Toscanella - zona Berti (2025.9)
Carto'Cité (2026-01-07 08:23:25+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour cet ajout. 
Est-ce que le bar Le gouter de Sophie remplace l'espace de vente SNCF, ou n'occupe qu'une partie de cet espace ?
Antoine de Carto’Cité pour SNCF #Transilien
bartgron (2025-11-13 21:15:14+00:00): Poprawiłem wszystkie błędy:
1. OpenStreetmap to nie jest miejsce do reklamowania swoich usług (tak jak miało to miejsce tutaj w opisie).
2. Obiekty dodaje się za pomocą osobnych punktów, nie do już istniejących adresów.
3. Do obiektów trzeba dać jakiś tag opisowy co to w ogóle za miejsce, jaki jest jego rodzaj, nie wystarczy nazwa i numer telefonu
MaD Clinic (2025-11-14 08:40:17+00:00): Ok. Pierwszy raz uzupełniałem informacje na tej mapie. Dziękuję za uwagi i wprowadzenie poprawek.
Pozdrawiam
eggie (2025-11-13 12:32:35+00:00): Dag SB..

Tip.. foot yes of designated en horse no hoeft niet of highway footway.
Incline lijkt me ook niet nodig.
Mvg..
eggie
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-24 06:20:56+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised Editing & import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176338499
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-01 12:58:48+00:00): zerkniesz na https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/edycja-numerow-telefonicznych/138759 ?
flohoff (2025-11-14 12:06:57+00:00): Moin,
deine turn restrictions haben hier scheinbar das routing kaputt gemacht:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=1035903,1154741#51.91725,7.73008,18z

Rot alt - Grün neu 

Man darf nicht mehr durch die Hofstraße.

Was stehen denn da für schilder die den U-Turn verbieten?

Hab nur mal schnell mit Google Maps geguckt und da standen keinerlei Schilder die irgendwas verbieten?

Woher kommt das verbot?

Flo
flohoff (2025-11-14 12:08:51+00:00): Ah - es ist das "no_left_turn" - Ist das neu?

Flo
Martin_2008 (2025-11-14 12:18:31+00:00): Ja, zurzeit darf wegen der Baustelle "Lasthaus" auf der Straße "Am Steintor" nicht von der Hofstraße links in die Straße Am Steintor eingebogen werden.
Martin_2008 (2025-11-14 12:22:01+00:00): Rechts Abbiegen von der Straße Am Steintor in die Hofstraße sowie Links abbiegen von der Münsterstraße in die Hofstraße ist nach wie vor erlaubt. Durchfahrt durch die Straße auch.
flohoff (2025-11-14 15:23:52+00:00): Okay - dann sollte noch ein "Note" drauf BIS wann das ist. 

Von der Herrenstraße ist es aber erlaubt? D.h. am Steintor ist grundsätzlich in beide richtungen befahrbar?
flohoff (2025-11-14 15:24:31+00:00): Also - Note - im Sinne von Bug - damit das für jedermann sichbar ist DAS das so ist und WARUM.

Ich hab nur gesehen das das routing kaputt gegangen ist ohne hinweis warum.
Martin_2008 (2025-11-14 15:53:55+00:00): Was heißt "Note - im Sinne von Bug"?

Die Baustelle wird es auch 2026 noch geben. Des weiteren ist das Rechtsabbiegen vom Ordnungamt angeordnet worden, um Rückstaus in der Hofstraße zu vermeiden. Die schon enge Straße "Am Steintor" ist durch ein Baugerüst weiter eingeengt, so dass faktisch nur 1 FAhrspur für beide Richtungen zur Verfügung steht.
Martin_2008 (2025-11-14 15:58:56+00:00): Umleitung von Alverskirchen kommend über Telgter Straße - Am Borggarten - Münsterstraße bis Kreisverkehr Münsterstraße mit L585 - L585 - Berler Kamp ausgeschildert.
flohoff (2025-11-15 08:36:22+00:00): Das problem ist das die turn restriction in der Karte nicht sichtbar ist. Und die einschränkung ist nur temporär. Also macht es sinn das möglichst sichtbar zu machen das das demnächst wieder entfernt werden muss - UND - das jeder der sich über das komische routing wundert das auch wiederfinden kann warum.

Also einen OSM Note auf machen mit z.b. einem Link zur Presseveröffentlichung.
aixbrick (2025-11-13 12:13:16+00:00): Hello,
please see my comments in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143829104 and just a week ago in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174325901.
It is shut off, not permanently gone.
Regards
aixbrick (2025-11-13 12:13:45+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174602168
aixbrick (2025-11-13 12:54:42+00:00): I want to answer to your comment in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143829104:
Just because the icon is missleading (on a map), there is no reason to delete it. The map also shows outdoor seating, where there is no in winter. Other maps could possibly render water taps on cemeteries which are also shut down in winter.
By the way: https://www.instagram.com/p/DLrGHFTMrO9/ shows, that it is working ;-)
arjunaraoc (2025-11-26 14:34:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175157494
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174601285
arjunaraoc (2025-11-26 14:34:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175157494
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174601285
maro21 (2025-11-22 13:25:44+00:00): Komentarze opisu zmian służą do podawania, co się zmieniło na mapie. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
dmfr (2026-04-06 20:58:09+00:00): Hello again seichter! This changeset modifies the square way:565089970 to area:highway=pedestrian from the previous highway=pedestrian+area=yes, so please find this comment as a kind reminder that this sort of changes should be fixed, as a follow-up to our discussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175205226 .

Regarding the use of virtual:highway=pedestrian:

Since this tag is sparsely used and undocumented, the mapper community cannot be expected to maintain a tag with ambiguous meaning when there are already widely-used and widely-supported alternatives, unless you raise a proposal that attempts to change the current consensus. So, can you kindly modify the tags of such ways to better-supported alternatives, such as highway=footway?
nevw (2025-11-13 21:27:31+00:00): Hi, I added the business to the address
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13302454443
ancuanatuath (2025-11-14 19:50:45+00:00): Your recent edits around Strathnaver have involved the deletion and replacement of a large number of features. Please could you try to follow the principle of 'keeping the history' (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history) in future edits? Keeping the history makes it easier for other editors to understand your edits and other past edits of features, and also means you won't end up inadvertently removing tags, such as the name of Allt Gruama Mòr as you did and were informed about in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173644213.

You have also deleted the waterway connections through lochs. This breaks hydrological analysis tools like WaterwayMap.org and I don't see what benefit there could be to deleting these connections. If you don't think they should be tagged as 'stream' and 'river', waterway=flowline is an option (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dflowline).
RyanBush (2025-11-15 16:35:43+00:00): Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Turns out my keybind got overridden so I assumed I was copying the history when I wasn't. Going forward it will be correct. 

I have also added flowlines and re-added the missing stream names (osm.org/changeset/174694794). If I have missed any please let me know, Ryan.
ancuanatuath (2025-11-16 20:38:23+00:00): Thanks! Much appreciated. There are three other streams I can find that lost their names - Allt nan Ruadhag, formerly way 932801140; Alltan Feàrna, formerly way 929712433; Alltan a' Mhullaich, formerly way 809909570.
RyanBush (2025-11-16 20:48:29+00:00): Thanks for spotting this. I have added them here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174745210 . Thanks, Ryan
to0ony (2025-11-13 12:22:53+00:00): Don not connect parts of obilaznica roundabout as it is needed for relations related to public transit of Brcko distrikt.
JJIglesias (2025-11-13 13:01:54+00:00): Saludos.
Si un lugar esta mal ubicado NO SE LO BORRA sino se lo mueve a su lugar correcto. Borrarlo significa perder la data asociada para siempre.
Todas esas estancias estan porque antiguamente aparecian en los mapas fisicos. Para el INE ya no existen y para el IGM poco a poco las esta borrando tambien.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ruins

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Historic

Saludos
JJ
JJIglesias (2025-11-13 13:02:49+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic
Edwin humana michaga (2025-11-13 14:01:42+00:00): Nonbres comp ch'ojllonkeri, jach'a ch'ijlla, jiwir wata ,etc coresponden  solo a sectores como ser: colinas quebradas. No necesariamente son estancias Sera necesario anotarlas ? Disculpas por el detalle,
JJIglesias (2025-11-15 16:24:36+00:00): cuando un lugar tiene nombre conocido pero NO tiene habitantes, se lo coloca con la etiqueta place=locality

Y no tienes q ponerle Estancia, ni Rancho ni Hacienda que son nombres tipicos usados en los mapas tradicionales en papel, a menos q el lugar de por si tenga esos denominadores.
Gracias
JJ
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dlocality