piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
cyclist789 (2025-05-05 15:13:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1346232136/history#map=19/54.999272/12.133536
Jeg har netop tilføjet de hække og hegn, der støder op til området her, og jeg tænkte, om man skulle gøre hele det grønne område til én Multipolygon. Er det okay med dig?

Jeg tænker desuden, at landuse=grass er mere beskrivende for området end leisure=park eller natural=grassland.

Jeg har gjort det samme i Stensved, hvis du er i tvivl om, hvad jeg mener:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18645605#map=18/54.999560/12.025236
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:31:27+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801805
kmpoppe_repair (2025-03-06 19:16:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163298591 where the changeset comment is: Reverting for probable vandalism in Ukraine
Filip009CZ (2025-08-27 14:49:22+00:00): Zdravím, jedná sa o značenú trasu? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18464010
dulky (2025-08-27 15:28:37+00:00): Áno, je značená žltou farbou
Filip009CZ (2025-08-27 16:04:37+00:00): Lebo používateľ #mapycom nám hlásil, že terén nie je vhodný pre bicykle, že sa jedná viac o skaly "No bike route, southern side of Sedlo Mely is a steep eroded gully of exposed rock (dolomite), while the lower section below the gully is full of sand washed down. The pass is not able to be traversed by bike". Takže je tam cyklotrasa značená žltým C-čkom?
dulky (2025-08-27 16:07:03+00:00): Áno, žlté C, niekedyje to ale aj ale holá skala, bike treba tlačiť, nie je v najlepšom stave.
Filip009CZ (2025-08-27 16:09:40+00:00): Neviete náhodou podľa smerovníkov, kto je správca cyklotrasy?
dulky (2025-08-27 16:22:56+00:00): Smerovník tam nie je žiadny :( Je to rozrobený projekt nejakého cykloklubu, cyklotrasy mali viesť po celom okrese BN, len to bolo zrušené kvôli nedostatku financií ale najmä ľudí.
Filip009CZ (2025-08-28 13:42:47+00:00): Ďakujem za podrobné info :)
eggie (2024-12-25 23:30:01+00:00): Hoi,

Vraag me alleen af of het floorplan van het park wel matcht met de werkelijkheid.
Zoals ik het had ingetekend was het precies volgens de paden.
Dat klopt dan nu niet met de vlindertuin. 

https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.29053,4.659147,19/?datastrip=20241025_PNEO-03

Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-12-26 06:07:52+00:00): reverted on request by changeset #160624357
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-28 01:29:47+00:00): This changeset removed highway tags from ramps.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160617904
Kleyton Leite (2024-12-28 02:42:39+00:00): i didnt follow, i have changed only two tags on streets around here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160617904#map=19/-24.088728/-46.610034 . If i changed any other highways tags, please help me to fix it.
Kleyton Leite (2024-12-28 02:44:16+00:00): I don see the changes at ramps, i only changed these streets:
<modify>
<way id="162252627" visible="true" version="4" changeset="160617904" timestamp="2024-12-25T22:03:34Z" user="Kleyton Leite" uid="21266787">
<nd ref="1741729604"/>
<nd ref="1741729632"/>
<tag k="highway" v="residential"/>
<tag k="surface" v="paved"/>
</way>
</modify>
<modify>
<way id="162252635" visible="true" version="4" changeset="160617904" timestamp="2024-12-25T22:03:34Z" user="Kleyton Leite" uid="21266787">
<nd ref="1741729646"/>
<nd ref="1741729608"/>
<tag k="highway" v="residential"/>
<tag k="surface" v="paved"/>
</way>
</modify>
.
Kleyton Leite (2024-12-28 02:50:04+00:00): ophh now i saw it, fixing: <osm version="0.6" generator="openstreetmap-cgimap 2.0.1 (2981438 spike-07.openstreetmap.org)" copyright="OpenStreetMap and contributors" attribution="http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright" license="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1-0/">
<way id="349913246" visible="true" version="9" changeset="160617904" timestamp="2024-12-25T22:03:34Z" user="Kleyton Leite" uid="21266787">
<nd ref="3556984925"/>
<nd ref="10966398428"/>
<nd ref="7893246518"/>
<nd ref="10966398427"/>
<nd ref="10966398426"/>
<nd ref="3556984924"/>
<nd ref="3556984923"/>
<nd ref="7893246514"/>
<nd ref="3556984913"/>
<nd ref="8166708197"/>
<tag k="addr:city" v="Mongaguá"/>
</way>
</osm>
Kleyton Leite (2024-12-28 03:00:17+00:00): Now i have fixed it, can you check please? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/349913246
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-28 03:04:20+00:00): Looks good thanks.
Sorry for not specifying which ways.
rempshaener (2024-12-26 08:17:09+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten. Diesem Wunsch komme ich gerne nach. 

Die von dir erfassten Stationen sind recht gut hier beschrieben: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:power%3Dsubstation#Beispiele.

D. h. In Anlehnung an diese Wiki-Beschreibung:
name	Kleinstationen haben keinen Namen, daher bitte entfernen
voltage		Es sind Primär- und Sekundärspannung anzugeben, durch ein Semikolon getrennt.

Es fehlen:
man_made=street_cabinet
utility=power

Sinnvoll ist auch – sofern verzeichnet – eine Referenz, z. B. fortlaufende Nummern, Standortbezeichnungen etc.

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag, nur so können beispielsweise im Bereich der Infrastruktur wertvolle Datenstrukturen entstehen.

Wenn du Fragen hast: bitte einfach melden.

Viele Grüße
Hufkratzer (2024-12-28 00:51:26+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1346238336 does not look like a horse riding centre on bing. It looks like an outdoor riding arena and should be tagged like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1230058171 (pitch + equestrian). In JOSM you can use the preset for sport=equestrian to tag it. See also: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding
philipcullen (2024-12-28 12:27:31+00:00): Thank you - I think you're right - that was the tag combination I was looking for. I've updated the tagging.
rempshaener (2024-12-26 08:19:58+00:00): Hier fehlt dann u. a. das utility=power.
Viele Grüße
nurdafur (2025-01-07 15:08:46+00:00): Hi Makeena
I discovered that you changed surface from forest-tracks in this and other changesets from surface=fine_grave or compacted to surface=gravel. I know this area very well. Nearly all the tracks in the forests around Zürich are compacted or fine_gravel. Have a look on the wiki-page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface
Happy new Year and have fun mapping.
Makeena (2025-01-07 20:10:03+00:00): Yeah, gravel does actually fit all right? The ways, in particular what is called forest street in CH are all well suitable for bicycles and mostly fit in the description "small pieces of gravel". Fine gravel is "used to specify fine loose gravel ... unsuitable for road bicycles" as they would sink in. I only remember one path in CH that would really fit into this. I've been there too numerous times and I saw all pretty solid ways...

btw I think I haven't really changed compacted recently, I would only do that right there in the field but I see surfaces with a thin layer of loose gravel more frequently than completely solid compacted surfaces as shown in the tag examples, all rather close to asphalt.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-18 19:21:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177388295 where the changeset comment is: Reverting suspected spam.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19519
rempshaener (2024-12-26 08:22:12+00:00): Hallo,
hier bitte etwas auf die Lagegenauigkeit und die Rechtwinkligkeit achten.
Rechtwinklig machen ist ganz einfach: in iD das Objekt markieren, Q drücken - fertig.
Viele Grüße
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-18 19:21:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177388295 where the changeset comment is: Reverting suspected spam.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19519
kmpoppe_repair (2025-03-06 19:16:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163298591 where the changeset comment is: Reverting for probable vandalism in Ukraine
DD1GJ (2024-12-26 23:34:10+00:00): Revert wg. unzulässiger Quelle GDI-Th, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160647007
AurélienQ (2024-12-30 11:46:44+00:00): Salut, quelle est ta source affirmant qu'il n'y aurait pas que des TAGV circulant sur cette ligne ?
Les docs que j'ai lus indiquaient que ce n'est qu'un tunnel LGV.
AurélienQ (2024-12-30 11:48:05+00:00): En fait j'ai ma réponse : l'UIC indique qu'une ligne conçue pour des vitesse élevée est une ligne à grande vitesse. Donc vu qu'OSM suit la def de l'UIC (cf le wiki), cette ligne devrait être mappée comme highspeed.
Xiram_ (2024-12-31 16:57:06+00:00): La ligne ne permettra pas des vitesses de 200/250 (je dois avouer que j'ai pas trouvé de source précise quant à la vitesse mais les courbes sont trop serrées pour permettre ces vitesses) qui font qu'une ligne soit considérée comme grande vitesse selon l'UIC, et il n'y aura pas que des TGV dans ce tunnel mais aussi des TER diamétralisés entre Miramas/Avignon et Aubagne/Toulon. https://www.lignenouvelle-provencecotedazur.fr/sites/lnpca.fr/files/telechargements/medias/documents/Pi%C3%A8ce_C2_CT2_Gare_et_travers%C3%A9e_souterraine_Marseille_0.pdf
AurélienQ (2025-01-01 12:50:56+00:00): D'accord ça marche ! Ton raisonnement est plus juste que le miens, et ta source plus récente. On laisse donc les choses telles qu'elles sont.
Bonne année !
Xiram_ (2025-01-01 17:35:58+00:00): Bonne année à toi aussi !
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:31:22+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801803
kidneyspr (2024-12-30 04:28:57+00:00): Por favor, ¿qué fuente usas para saber que había un error? Si la fuente es válida, me gustaría usarla.
BigKev97 (2025-10-10 13:58:17+00:00): Error del nombre de apellido.
nevw (2024-12-26 00:59:03+00:00): Hi, names are not added to common things that don't have names like toilets and drinking fountains as the primary tag does that and is often helped by a suitable icon display. I have fixed your edits.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-25 23:51:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2743964122
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1346282955

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kmpoppe_repair (2025-03-06 19:16:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163298591 where the changeset comment is: Reverting for probable vandalism in Ukraine
rempshaener (2024-12-26 08:25:30+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe deine Bearbeitungen so weit durchgeschaut. Sofern nicht individuell kommentiert: es gelten die Anmerkungen deines ersten Changesets. Wenn du Hilfe benötigst: bitte melden.

Weiterhin frohes Mappen!

Viele Grüße
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 05:01:24+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=japanese;f
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12452266962/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=japanese
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
DD1GJ (2024-12-26 23:34:03+00:00): Revert wg. unzulässiger Quelle GDI-Th, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160647007
kmpoppe_repair (2025-03-06 19:16:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163298591 where the changeset comment is: Reverting for probable vandalism in Ukraine
DD1GJ (2024-12-26 23:33:57+00:00): Revert wg. unzulässiger Quelle GDI-Th, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160647007
eggie (2024-12-26 08:25:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
MxxCon (2024-12-27 01:40:00+00:00): Hello.
Please note that it's inappropriate to add this kind of information to OSM.
This changeset will be reverted in full.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160620838
Srdjan023 (2024-12-26 18:23:19+00:00): Vraćam izmene jer si pokvario većpostojeće poligone

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160648798
Stanislav Soldatov (2024-12-27 10:05:26+00:00): @Srdjan023, hello!

Hvala što ste ovo istakli. Pokušao sam da razbijem proces na serije i da to radim postepeno. Verujem da je ovaj pristup bio pogrešan. Pokušaću da ovo uradim drugačije, tako da za svako urezivanje svi postojeći poligoni budu ispravni.
Izvinjavam se zbog neprijatnosti.
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Glassman (2024-12-26 19:56:43+00:00): Why did you move the address node to the other side of the street? According to the county records it belongs at the original location. I've moved it back. If that is wrong please let me know.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160622909
wolfy1339 (2024-12-26 22:58:25+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for improcing the geometry of railways!

The way that you have conducted the import breaks the spirit of the OSM community. Deleting data when not keeping it's history/existing data should be a last resort.

I encourage you to get familiar with the Replace Geometry function in JOSM the next time you wish to do a similar edit. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/utilsplugin2#Replace_geometry_(Ctrl+Shift+G)

I posted on the community forums so that a more experienced user could restore the data you have deleted while using your updated geometry. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/railway-import-north-bend-boston-bar-bc/123412
mavl (2025-03-07 15:05:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
Константин Гам (2025-02-13 07:52:40+00:00): Проезд НЕ открыт.
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
evdence (2024-12-26 06:56:15+00:00): Wrong changeset name
MichaelFS (2024-12-26 09:19:10+00:00): Hallo hikerduo, willkommen bei OpenStreetmap und Danke für Deine Beiträge. Ich wünsche Dir viel Spaß hier! Deine Änderungen schauen gut aus, allerdings habe ich amenity reaktiviert und "disused" hinzugefügt; schau bitte einmal hier:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:*. Damit erübrigt sich der Name oder ist der lokal "bekannt"?

Wenn Du Fragen hast, melde Dich gerne bei mir.
hikerduo (2024-12-26 09:43:48+00:00): Ok, vielen Dank. Ich habe 3 Änderungen vorgenommen und bin jetzt verwirrt. 
1) Am Inninger Bach gibt es jetzt einen freigegebenen und befahrbaren Fußweg von der Hauptstraße bis zum Anger. Er ist nur teilweise eingezeichnet.
2) Die Sparkasse auf der anderen Bachseite ist schon lange nicht mehr da. 
3) Die Feuerwehr neben der ehemaligen Sparkasse hat schon lange ein neues Gebäude. Die Doppelgarage ist als alte Feuerwehr bekannt. 
Bei Punkt 2 und 3 würde disused passen, aber nicht beim neuen Weg (Punkt 1)
Sorry, ich kenn mich mit den Beschreibungen nicht aus
MichaelFS (2024-12-26 18:50:59+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung; und Sorry, ich hatte mich missverständlich ausgedrückt. "disused" nur für 2) und 3), der Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056777432 ohne dieses Tag. Meiner Meinung nach ist aktuell alles richtig hier.
nevw (2024-12-26 08:14:32+00:00): Hi, can you fix the format of the opening hours thanks.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2025-01-15 16:03:02+00:00): Hi, Hcourt! 
My name is Yuliya, and I am the Quality Control Lead on the OSM team at Lyft. We have encountered several changesets where you have changed the road classification from “residential” to “residential_link” (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/238909875). According to the OSM Wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link, there is no such road class as a “residential link”. It seems more appropriate to retain the original highway type, especially since such roads are not rendered on the OSM tiles. Have there been any changes in mapping rules related to the topic? Could you please clarify why, in your opinion, the residential class is not suitable for these roads? 

Best regards, Yuliya
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160625319
ivanbranco (2024-12-27 10:22:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152708625
Hai cancellato l'area residenziale a ovest di Via Guido Casoni. Non sono edifici residenziali? Se no, cosa sono?

Hai cancellato un cancello per poi ridisegnarlo. In futuro se possibile muovi il cancello già esistente, sennó la cronologia dell'elemento va persa.
azdenardi (2024-12-27 10:33:55+00:00): Ho cancellato la zona residenziale a ovest di Via Casoni perché disegnata in modo impreciso, come molte altre della zona. In particolare, non tutti gli edifici dell'isolato hanno una destinazione residenziale. Per il cancello, è stato un mio errore.
ezio_m (2024-12-29 18:33:42+00:00): Come da OSMwiki, "If there is a small (one company/property) area of commercial (or similar) landuse within an otherwise residential area, you can still decide to use landuse=residential for the outline of the whole larger area as a preliminary solution. You could later draw a separate area tagged with landuse=commercial for that commercial establishment."
Quindi o vengono mappati i singoli landuse o si tiene la principale area residenziale mappando poi le attività (penso prevalentemente commerciali o uffici) come punti.
ezio_m (2024-12-29 18:33:52+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential
Szymson (2024-12-26 10:03:01+00:00): Popieram, +1
theDM (2024-12-26 11:14:28+00:00): Planowałem w przeszłości podnieść Płażyńskiego na primary, ale nie wiedziałem, jak dalej za Hallera, a właściwie za skrzyżowaniem z Jana Pawła II je poprowadzić.
Gdyby powstała Droga Zielona, to sprawa byłaby oczywista, ale nie ma, co na nią liczyć.
Szymson (2024-12-26 11:21:27+00:00): Szybciej się doczekasz jeszcze 10 nowych naziemnych przejść dla pieszych przy dworcu głównym xD
theDM (2024-12-26 11:27:23+00:00): i festynów z okazji niezakończonej budowy obecnego :D
Niemniej, co sądzisz o primary dla Płazyńskiego i Czarnego Dworu? Ja jestem za, ale do dyskusji, jak to dalej poprowadzić. Poniekąd to jest ciąg pełniący rolę wschodniej obwodnicy miasta i głównego ciągu w tej części miasta.
kornad (2024-12-30 08:03:21+00:00): Włączę się do dyskusji. Według mnie ewentualne podniesienie Płażyńskiego do primary musiałoby się wiązać z poprowadzeniem tego ciągu dalej ulicami Czarny Dwór, Jana Pawła II, Rzeczypospolitej i Hynka do Grunwaldzkiej lub może nawet aż do Obwodnicy Trójmiasta poprzez Trasę Słowackiego. Jedynie te drogi mają odpowiednią klasę techniczną na przyjęcie takiego ruchu. Docelowo jednak ciąg ten powinien być poprowadzony ulicami Nową Gdańską i Nową Kościuszki, jako domknięcie planowanego układu drogowego. A co do Drogi Zielonej to faktycznie nie powstanie ona raczej na tyle szybko, aby był sens debatować o niej teraz w tym kontekście.
theDM (2024-12-31 09:37:49+00:00): Miałem podobny zamysł, ale czy tylko standard drogi ma znaczenie? Pod względem ruchu Rzeczypospolitej za Jana Pawła II i Chłopska do Obrońców Wybrzeża mają większy ruch i znaczenie niż Jana Pawła II. Temat do rozważania.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-18 14:42:30+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12452687133/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
0235 (2024-12-30 18:24:31+00:00): You should be writing about the changes you made, e.g. "added buildings and road"
Sara Newmountain (2025-01-01 17:44:06+00:00): Thank you bagis!
janesk (2025-02-25 04:01:57+00:00): Hello, I have removed the hundred or so shrub nodes that you added for the hedges and replaced them with a way. Hedges shouldn't be mapped as discrete nodes but as ways (barrier=hedge). While technically a hedge is made up of discrete shrubs, it isn't reasonable (or often possible) to verify the existence of the individual shrubs even on the ground, let alone from aerial imagery. It's also just more functionally useful to map it as a way.
user_21880486 (2025-02-25 04:29:26+00:00): Hi there,

I was unaware of being able to make them a way.
dcapillae (2024-12-26 10:12:48+00:00): Buenos días.

Este objeto no aparece en imágenes aéreas y está fuera del campo de golf. ¿Seguro que es correcto?

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
donovaly (2024-12-29 01:01:21+00:00): Please only map what you see in real life. You changed a vague plan (we are in Albania and in election times) and even the river. These changes can first be made when the river flows indeed differently and the roads are under construction.
donovaly (2024-12-29 01:15:04+00:00): And you also changed the administrative boundary. Please stop that. The administrative boundaries have to be changed by the city council, you cannot just change them as you like.
angys (2024-12-26 16:02:56+00:00): Hii, refer to the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bus_routes_in_Klang_Valley for create a bus relation. and normally we use only Rapid Bus, withou Sdn Bhd
angys (2024-12-26 16:04:05+00:00): https://kltransit.my/en/routes/T561
Probably this will help u also
StC (2025-01-05 10:30:56+00:00): Bonjour Denis,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là (le E2 à Dieuze, en allongeant un chemin qui appartient à la relation). Je m'occupe de la correction.
Denis_Helfer (2025-01-07 22:28:44+00:00): Merci de la réparation. J'essaie de faire gaffe, mais je n'ai pas 100% de réussite. Désolé.