piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-13 05:35:59+00:00): Hi BC_2, welcome to OSM.

Thanks for your corrections.

Could you please check the name of the following way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/888033589

"Franklin Streer" or "Franklin Street"?
willkmis (2026-04-13 13:00:04+00:00): Just FYI, Northampton St does not have a signal when it hits Connecticut, it has a stop sign as was mapped before. The crossing is a hawk signal. I corrected it here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181274688
ICT_maps (2026-04-15 02:55:05+00:00): this appears to have broken the relation entirely
SimonPoole (2026-04-13 02:57:37+00:00): This was Birrwil not Beinwil
TheSwavu (2026-04-14 10:47:39+00:00): Hi,

How does https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1498930800 connect to the road way?

Thanks
Logan City Council Parks (2026-04-15 01:00:17+00:00): Thanks for that comment.  I've updated the map to show the cycle crossing from the road onto the segregated cycle track.  Appreciate the comment.
SurfBalBay News (2026-04-17 05:07:33+00:00): For Way 435575184 & 435575607 of the Northern Star Condominiums, they are not tourist buildings. These are residential.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181255082
dmjab13 (2026-04-13 18:44:27+00:00): probably would have been better to do this on a park by park basis due to the sheer coverage of this changeset
NeisBot (2026-04-13 03:48:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 24 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1498937841 v1 | 24 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181255865
schobbish (2026-04-14 00:40:22+00:00): Should be addr:flats instead of addr:unit, no?
QuiLe (2026-04-14 01:22:31+00:00): addr:unit is still accepted 

http://osm.wiki/Key:addr:unit The number, letter, or name included in the address to represent a subdivision (such as a single unit or flat) within a larger building or complex.

If needed, I can always change the addr:unit to addr:flats
schobbish (2026-04-14 01:53:00+00:00): I take "single unit or flat" to mean that it can only represent one apartment at a time, whereas addr:flats specifically says it can be used with a range of unit numbers. Wiki also notes that a unit may contain hyphens, so there's no way to disambiguate between a range of units and a unit with a hyphen in it (also don't know how you would put that in addr:flats but whatever)
iandees (2026-04-13 04:47:57+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12544358590 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181256956, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-04-13 11:40:55+00:00): On ne peut pas marcher à côté du vélo? (dismount)
martin hamel (2026-04-13 12:07:51+00:00): Il y a bien un panneau p-125, désolé. Je vais le remettre

https://www.rsr.transports.gouv.qc.ca/Dispositifs/Details.aspx?cid=13368&che=PRESC&cat=PRESC
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-04-14 13:09:40+00:00): Merci! bonne journée!
acet2ngaia (2026-04-14 09:38:16+00:00): Nice additions! Did you delete the pedestrian crossing nodes on the intersection, though?
NG218 (2026-04-14 10:44:41+00:00): I did so I can add them back in later with better geometry and with the paths.
acet2ngaia (2026-04-14 11:16:53+00:00): I've done this before but was advised that it's better to keep the history when possible! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
mcliquid (2026-04-13 11:21:19+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!
Please note for the future: changesets should be local.To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)• keep changes within the same country• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different areaWhy? Have a look at the section"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesetsThanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
ËdzëronK (2026-04-13 12:45:46+00:00): sorry for the inconvenience
Metro28 (2026-04-15 05:21:25+00:00): Ok!!
mcliquid (2026-04-15 06:18:51+00:00): 🧐
mavl (2026-04-14 14:45:53+00:00): Здравствуйтt. Этот пакет правок добавляет:  
1. Непрямоугольное здание. Чтобы сделать здание прямоугольным, нужно выполнить команду "Сделать углы прямыми" в редакторе iD (которым вы пользовались.  
2.  Название здания "Сервисный центр "Упорово-Сервис". Чтобы добавить сервисный центр, нужно добавить специальный тег, иначе это просто здание с названием. Список тегов можно посмотреть, например, на странице:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:craft
NeisBot (2026-04-13 05:16:19+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, Edivho Febrian Putra.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added living street with bicycle access, foot permission, and motor vehicle access, named Gg Jamet"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
eggie (2026-04-13 06:46:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-13 06:47:19+00:00): Bij die brandgangen zou je footway=alley kunnen toevoegen.
SomeLocalMapper (2026-04-13 06:55:12+00:00): Top ga ik doen.
SomeLocalMapper (2026-04-13 07:02:58+00:00): Changeset: 181260067
eggie (2026-04-13 08:01:08+00:00): 👍
Purumi (2026-04-13 13:51:40+00:00): Sorry, but I think the resource in Wikidata and Wikipedia is wrong. I'm local and all of us call that town Huandiqiao. Also, in https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E8%BF%98%E5%9C%B0%E6%A1%A5%E9%95%87/7714451 it is also recorded as Huandiqiao.
Wildsharky (2026-05-12 05:59:40+00:00): Hi Purumi,

Thank you for your feedback and for sharing the additional local reference. After reviewing your comments, it seems the name has been restored to the previous version. Thank you for contributing local knowledge and helping improve OpenStreetMap data quality.
NeisBot (2026-04-13 05:24:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13726804987 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Chiropody clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
rempshaener (2026-04-13 20:23:21+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe nur eine Anmerkung: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie.
Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-26 02:09:12+00:00): Reverted SEO addition of name=* to building with no other meaningful tags

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183183145
Jrachi (2026-04-14 07:29:28+00:00): Ciao.
Hai disused su un percorso escursionistico.
Questo lo rende inservibile per qualunque consumatore di dati. E lo rende anche un oggetto tra l'esisteva e il forse verrà ripristinato.
Perché?
Non è più mantenuto?
Hai chiesto all'operator( comune di Collazzone)?
Hai considerato l'idea che essendo un oggetto virtuale (se manca la segnaletica sul terreno) disused equivale a non esiste?
gs3§zba (2026-04-14 12:10:23+00:00): Hi Jrachi, yes, I set the object https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8149143 to "disused". I'm fully aware of the meaning of this status. The facts are: there is a map in Collazzone village showing the route, but the route is maintained very badly. In the part we explored there are no sign with text or numbers. The marking in red/white is old and very sparse. Two paths are totally blocked by thorny undergrowth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/572101497, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/573236436). The existence in Openstreetmap is literally misleading for users and hikers.
Jrachi (2026-04-14 18:49:19+00:00): Hai chiesto all'user che ha creato il percorso prima di disabilitarlo?
Le informazioni che dici sono da inserire nelle singole way (obstacle=vegetation, trail_visibility=bad, ecc.) non hanno a che vedere con la relazione.
A mio parere, non dovresti disabilitare una relazione per questi motivi.
la cattiva manutenzione va segnalata all'operator, ed i problemi dei singoli tratti vanno sui singoli tratti.

Buon mapping!
Ivo
gs3§zba (2026-04-14 19:45:01+00:00): We map the reality, the truth. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Do_correct_errors. It is certainly not our mapper's business to ask operators of hiking routes about their motives and plans and when they will restore their object. The two paths which I have tagged as "disused"are not just badly visible. You would map a path as "badly visible" e.g. if it leads over meadow an you don't see the exact course. The vegetation there is more than an obstacle. The paths are no longer accessible, they are just no longer there. Go there and have a look at the two spots and you will agree. It is just obvious that not only these two paths but the entire route ist abandoned. It ist misleading an irresponsible, if the Openstreetmap database contains hiking routes which are not there. Keep in mind, people rely on Openstreetmap.
Luzandro (2026-05-13 10:02:08+00:00): Hallo,

siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5286887
ilias_ (2026-04-13 09:00:52+00:00): 20 million dirhams? so the most expensive university in the world is actually in Fès! Mindblowing.
TrickyFoxy (2026-05-25 09:44:49+00:00): Вы рисовали по старым снимкам, на которых дороги ещё не было
TrickyFoxy (2026-05-25 09:45:54+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183146994
Tomas Straupis (2026-04-14 10:14:37+00:00): Hello. Please do not change Lithuanian names, you're using some incorrect source and therefore destroying good data.
NeisBot (2026-04-13 06:42:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/8457875404 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Security company"

#MapWithoutSpam
ajmat (2026-04-14 10:25:51+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 181314911
iandees (2026-04-13 13:15:26+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13352024463 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181275862, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Wildsharky (2026-04-15 08:43:51+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181349544
habi (2026-04-13 07:33:53+00:00): Added with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181261047
SomeLocalMapper (2026-04-13 07:38:51+00:00): Het gaat hier om een FPA (Forensisch Psychiatrische Afdeling) en FPK (Forensisch Psychiatrische Kliniek). De mensen die hier zitten hebben 99/100 keer tbs met voorwaarden of alleen voorwaarden gekregen vanuit de rechtbank.

fyi: Van der Hoeven Kliniek in Utrecht wordt ook een ziekenhuis genoemd.
De werknemers worden in De Boog o.a. ook verpleegkundigen genoemd.
SomeLocalMapper (2026-04-13 07:50:41+00:00): Zie ook https://ggnet.nl/locaties/de-boog
eggie (2026-04-13 08:10:06+00:00): Wanneer het een groot psychiatrisch ziekenhuis is zou het we als hospital getagd kunnen worden, maar meestal wordt clinic gebruikt. Toch iets kleiner dan een regulier ziekenhuis. Bovendien kan ziekenhuis gebruikers op het verkeerde been zetten.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dclinic

en
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=hospital
eggie (2026-04-13 08:11:18+00:00): Zou zelf dit als clinic taggen
SomeLocalMapper (2026-04-13 08:51:43+00:00): Dank voor de uitleg. Ga het aanpassen.
rempshaener (2026-04-13 20:19:25+00:00): Hallo,
auch hier: grundsätzlich keine Anmerkungen.
Ein Problem hast du nur übernommen: Der Hermes-Paketshop wird nicht separat als amenity=post_office geführt, sondern an der Reinigung als post_office =post_partner.
Als Vergleich: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8069503410
Viele Grüße
Woodalchi (2026-04-14 06:07:32+00:00): Servus, der Hermes-Paketshop war lediglich ein Zusatzangebot in der Wäscherei und kein eigenständiger Laden. Er ist mit umgezogen.
rempshaener (2026-04-14 15:49:17+00:00): Hallo,,
ja genau, deswegen wird das Tagging an einem Node kombiniert.
Soll ich kurz zeigen, was ich meine?
Viele Grüße
Woodalchi (2026-04-14 17:39:43+00:00): Ich nutze die Bearbeitung zwar nur lokal und ab und zu, aber man kann nur dazu lernen. Also gerne ...
rempshaener (2026-04-14 19:00:19+00:00): Hallo,
kein Problem.
Ich habe jetzt beide Nodes zusammengeführt und das auf post_office=post_partner umgestellt,
Das sieht dann so https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1145565266 aus.
Viele Grüße
Woodalchi (2026-04-14 20:15:30+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Hilfe. Werde wohl in nächster Zeit darauf zurückkommen, da in der Hausnr. 22 derzeit ein Friseur, ein Fahrrad-Laden und der nun leere Wäscheladen "wohnen".
rempshaener (2026-04-14 20:24:01+00:00): Gerne
iandees (2026-04-13 13:15:32+00:00): Hi! It looks like the website URL on node/7934571299 may have been copied from Google Maps (it contained Google tracking parameters). Please be careful not to copy information from Google into OpenStreetMap, as Google's data is copyrighted.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-04-13 13:21:04+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for bringing this to our attention; we will rectify this error.
Best Regards
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-04-13 13:50:17+00:00): Hello! Thank you for pointing that out.I am sorry for the mistake—it was an unfortunate copy-paste error with the tracking parameters. Have a good day.
Wildsharky (2026-04-15 08:49:37+00:00): Revert of 181253999
Kovoschiz (2026-04-15 09:29:12+00:00): Hi you don't need to comment it when I uploaded with exactly this. Please use other tools if you want to make personal notes of changesets that at least doesn't add to the upload comment. I would welcome and encourage if you can contribute to OSMCha or develop your own private changeset notes service.
Kovoschiz (2026-04-15 09:33:36+00:00): It helps reduce embarrassment and annoyance with your false positives https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181025537
iandees (2026-04-13 13:15:43+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2882037938 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181275877, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Dodko (2026-04-20 08:06:24+00:00): Treba dávať pozor na správne ref:minvskaddress
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1498961743/history
eggie (2026-04-13 08:14:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
arjunaraoc (2026-05-09 13:07:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181261438
Wildsharky (2026-04-15 08:35:25+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181315033,181315033
BrummsLee (2026-04-13 12:25:22+00:00): Hallo sembelst134!
Die Straßennamen wurden schon von Granitschädel geändert!!!
Warum änderst du die wieder in die alten Namen???
sembelst134 (2026-04-13 12:59:31+00:00): Ach verdammt, entschuldigt bitte
Ich war nur wegen der neuen Häuser in der Ansicht vom WebAtlasSN wobei der abweichende Name auffiel.
Die Notiz muss ich übersehen haben, sorry
BrummsLee (2026-04-13 13:18:07+00:00): Kein Thema, kann passieren... 🙂
Habs gleich wieder korrigiert.
iandees (2026-04-13 13:16:04+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8815954425 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181275897, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-04-13 08:18:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13726998445 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bicycle shop"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Sklep rowerowy"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
kgajewski (2026-04-13 08:47:26+00:00): Thanks you for the notice. Changes have been made.
aceman444 (2026-04-25 12:58:00+00:00): Zdravim, nemozete len tak do stredu budovy vlozit inu budovu (building): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1498967942 . Je to zrejme cast budovy (building:part). A tiez podorys tej veze vyzera byt vacsi ako ste to nakreslili (na fotkach zabera celu tu prednu cast kostola).

Tiez tych 5 soch (ktore nie su v stene), je vovnutri kostola?
aceman444 (2026-04-25 12:58:45+00:00): Tiez poprosim trochu hodnotnejsie popisy sad zmien ako "pridanie objektov", pozrite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn .
Pavol33 (2026-04-25 14:16:10+00:00): Dakujem. Ano mal by som podrobnejsir popisovat, ale robim desiatky a az 100zmien denne, tak to nie je mozne popisovat
Pavol33 (2026-04-25 14:18:17+00:00): Tie sochy su na streche kostola
Pavol33 (2026-04-25 14:19:23+00:00): To co pisete o nejakej ortomozajke, tak netusim co. Ja to robim na stranke www.openstreetmap
aceman444 (2026-04-25 15:36:00+00:00): Ok, ak su na streche, tak treba dat location=roof, nech je to jasne.
Ale na streche vidiet z ulice len 2 (a su uplne na rohu strechy, nie tam kde ste ich umiestnili).
Co tie ostatne, ktore su umiestnene vo vezi?

Tak mozno nerobte takou rychlostou, nech to ma aj nejaku kvalitu. Slovenske popisy sad zmien im v Amerike velmi nepomozu.
fx11 (2026-04-13 08:35:55+00:00): In Verbindung mit Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5095910
Scout Jens (2026-07-04 16:13:13+00:00): Servus mfbehrens, 
Du hast den Platz nach welchen Daten gemappt? Die Bäume gibt es noch nicht. Bist Du sicher, dass die Lage stimmt? 
Grüße, Jens
mfbehrens (2026-07-06 09:16:49+00:00): https://bnn.de/img/9609585/IUjUe1pU-Teg1tPfygTcCA/INF_So%20soll%20das%20Durlacher%20Tor%20k%C3%BCnftig%20aussehen_ONLINE-01?size=1920&format=jpeg&variant=LANDSCAPE_16x9

Ist glaub nicht genau der Plan, von dem ich es gezeichnet hab.
Allerdings habe ich bei den Bäumen das proposed vergessen.
Danke für den Hinweis, ich werde mich die Tage drum kümmern.
citrula (2026-04-13 18:35:32+00:00): Can you explain why this specific section is a bridleway?
asphalteric (2026-04-14 08:11:27+00:00): I classified it as that because it is not a road. It seems like a trail for service workers on horses. It does not look like a trail that is generally open for the public to use. I visited Alcatraz recently and all visitors were told to walk away from here and in the other direction towards the Alcatraz Giftshop.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-04-15 18:48:32+00:00): If this is a service way for private usage as stated, then this should be tagged as such with access=private (and the gate tagged as a node at the appropriate spot if desired), rather than as a ~100 m long barrier=gate (with no explicit access restrictions).
CAM-Gerlach (2026-04-15 21:34:06+00:00): Per the request of Citrula on the OSM-US Slack, reverted/repaired mistagging of the entire private road as a barrier=gate instead of setting access=private and adding/tagging the individual gate nodes with such in changeset 181388287

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181388287
CAM-Gerlach (2026-04-15 21:09:27+00:00): Per the request of Citrula on the OSM-US Slack, reverted/repaired mistagging of the entire private road as a barrier=gate instead of setting access=private and tagging the individual gate nodes with such in changeset 181387495

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181387495
CAM-Gerlach (2026-04-15 21:25:54+00:00): Per the request of Citrula on the OSM-US Slack, reverted/repaired mistagging of the entire service road as a barrier=fence just because it is sometimes blocked by one, and instead added the helpful changeset comment here to the parking area to assist future mappers in changeset 181388031

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181388031
eggie (2026-04-13 11:42:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt aangepast. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Mar1jn (2026-04-13 11:59:06+00:00): Ik heb de snelheidslimiet ingevuld en de naam gewijzigd naar Goorseweg
Mar1jn (2026-04-13 11:59:23+00:00): Met vriendelijke groet,

Marijn Hannink
eggie (2026-04-13 12:01:53+00:00): Ahhh.. oke.. bedankt voor je reactie.
Mapse,
eggie
CAM-Gerlach (2026-04-15 21:18:58+00:00): Per the request of Citrula on the OSM-US Slack, reverted/repaired mistagging of the entire private road as a barrier=gate instead of setting access=private and instead adding the individual gate node with a note=* set to the helpful changeset comment provided here, in changeset 181387857

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181387857
ajmat (2026-04-15 06:23:51+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 181351182