piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_9221753 (2024-04-23 04:44:30+00:00): This guy deleted the samples, before asking me, this was the reason. Since he had a problem with those, he should suggest me change then AND NOT TO DELETE THEM. This was disrespectful and I hope he will accept if I do the same to his changesets!
user_9221753 (2024-04-23 06:28:47+00:00): He deleted again the circles, he has big problem with his self and deletes my things?
user_9221753 (2024-04-23 07:03:01+00:00): About JOSM, I cant use because one of the pc i use, is 32bit, so i cant install it.
The jurk deleted again the circles, maybe there should be another way to make him understand
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-23 11:37:33+00:00): changesets with the 17,000 deletions:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150284294
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150284298,
SomeoneElse (2024-04-23 11:42:03+00:00): Hello again Map-Finder, 
You've said "The jurk deleted again the circles, maybe there should be another way to make him understand".
To be clear - you are the "jerk" here.
It is not OK to add fake data to OSM.  It is also not OK to add ways named as you have in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15986 .  That is abuse, and I have blocked your account for a day as a result: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15986 .  In the light of what has gone before a one-day block is quite lenient.
When your block expires, please ask for help on the forum about the issues that you have problems with, such as running JOSM on an antique PC, or using alignment data (in whatever editor) from outside of OSM.
akimapbuilder (2024-04-19 11:26:07+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since there is no building in sight.
Frans S (2024-04-27 08:25:51+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please connect highways to each other, where it is logic, to achieve a network. 
Best regards
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-19 11:00:19+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10068851087
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175284794

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_177389 (2024-04-20 07:55:31+00:00): Hi,

es ist nicht notwendig, die Zusammengehörigkeit von Gebäude und Grundstück in eine Relation zu bringen. Ich habe die entsprechenden Tags an der Außenlinie angebracht und die nicht funktionierende Relation gelöscht. Jetzt wird das Grundstück auch als Sozialeinrichtung angezeigt.

Beste Grüße,
Mario
Isohypse0815 (2024-04-20 19:37:48+00:00): Vielen Dank!
Filip009 (2024-04-22 10:52:37+00:00): Zdravím, pre mapovanie vodných tokov odporúčam použiť ako podklad DMR 5.0. Neviem ako ho pridať v iDeditore (prehliadači) ako podklad (v programe JOSM sa pridá jednoducho ako nová vrstva), ale korytá potokov je tam nádherne vidieť. Taktiež nemyslím, že ste aj na tejto čiare https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1274064149/history chcel dať tag tunnel.
Narušiteľ (2024-04-22 18:10:13+00:00): Nieje to potok, je to odvodnovaci kanal "ditch" a tunnel nie je tunel ale culvert - priepust popod cestu. Nie je to most.
Filip009 (2024-04-22 18:14:01+00:00): Aj tá konkrétna časť, ktorú som poslal je vedená rúrou (priepustom) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1274064149/history ? (Nikde som nepísal, že je to most)
Narušiteľ (2024-04-22 18:22:44+00:00): aha uz vidim. Dakujem za upozornenie.
Filip009 (2024-04-22 18:28:47+00:00): Ospravedlňujem sa, keď vám už leziem na nervy, že komentujem skoro každú sadu zmien, ale nechcem vám zle :)
SFGJimStreet (2024-05-02 11:29:22+00:00): Bonjour pq changez vous toute ces routes ? que j'ai mis des jours à classifier ?
SFGJimStreet (2024-05-02 11:37:41+00:00): Sur la commune de Theux toute les routes ont été re-classifiée, rien n'est a modifier ou corriger !
SFGJimStreet (2024-05-02 11:46:26+00:00): Si je vois bien vous changez sans réellement connaitre les routes et les endroits ! êtes vous de la commune (habitant) ?
StijnRR (2024-05-10 20:04:11+00:00): I asked around in the mapping community and the conclusion is that what you are doing is completely wrong: service roads are not for normal publicly owned general traffic roads. So please repair all your mistakes and revert your 'service' roads back to residential or unclassified roads.
SFGJimStreet (2024-05-11 05:55:47+00:00): Bonjour,

Je ne les mets pas en "voie de service ni en allée privée" mais en "ruelle (rue étroite)". je trouve effectivement que les routes qui sont mise en "voie de service" n'est pas correct. Mais effectivement visuellement elles ont la même largeur.

Bien à vous

Jim
StijnRR (2024-05-13 20:16:26+00:00): Yes, you do turn them into service roads/alleys (highway=sevice, service=alley), while they are unclassified/residential roads. So yes, what you have done is wrong. And I ask you again: repair those mistakes.

Regards,

Stijn
SFGJimStreet (2024-05-13 20:57:06+00:00): Bonsoir, 

Je viens de comprendre ce qu'il s'est passé, lorsque j'ai mits ces routes en (route étroite "ruelle") il y a déjà des mois. C'était avant la mise à jours d'OSM et il n'indiquait pas la même description pour ruelle.

Ça ne m'arrange pas, mais je corrigerais

Bien à vous 

Jim
BCNorwich (2024-04-20 07:58:28+00:00): Hi, More duplicated highways, please see:- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=67.10864&lat=36.76116&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

Please stop the duplications. 

Regards Bernard.
maraf24 (2024-04-19 11:47:22+00:00): To chyba do skasowania?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11830356281
PawelF (2024-04-19 12:00:47+00:00): Nie jestem pewny. W innym mieście spotkałem się, żę i obszar i punkt były równocześnie.
Dawid2849 (2024-04-19 12:21:37+00:00): Nie powinno tak być. W OSM nie mapujemy jednego obiektu za pomocą kilku elementów: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Jeden_obiekt,_jeden_element_OSM
PawelF (2024-04-19 13:31:35+00:00): OK, usunąłem punkty wskazujące na osiedla
maraf24 (2024-04-19 15:07:44+00:00): Może być tak, że jest granica osiedla (jako boundary=administrative) i węzeł. z tagiem place. Ma to swoje historyczne i użytkowe uzasadnienie.
Ale nie powinno być dwóch landuse=residential, bo to niepotrzebna duplikacja.
une abeille (2024-06-01 14:05:12+00:00): The geometry of the ice rink was based on a site survey I did. It should probably be reverted.

Also, I think the entrance nodes for the Metro were in the correct spot before? The parts they're connected to now are just overhanging roofs.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-06-01 18:49:51+00:00): The metro station entrances are correctly placed, I just checked with photos of the area. 

As for the ice rink, can you retrace it correctly, since reverting would mean loosing a lot of data...

Thanks!
une abeille (2024-06-03 23:50:00+00:00): I was on site and can verify that there is an overhang. The entrance nodes are currently attached to those instead of the wall of the building itself. I do not have the photos anymore because that phone spontaneously died, but you can see on Mapillary.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=639009321465902&focus=photo&lat=45.488949788333&lng=-73.583866526667&z=17
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-06-04 11:45:27+00:00): Oh I understand what you mean, but in most case, we can map the overhangs/roofs in the building itself. Normally, we would separate into building:part, but I am not sure it is worth it to do it for a small metro edicule.
PeterPan99 (2024-09-09 15:59:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356789767, which was part of this changeset appears to be misplaced in Milton Keynes, UK.  It seems to be part of a change in the Netherlands.  I propose to delete it, unless I hear that you have reason to keep it there.
Colin Smale (2024-09-09 19:12:50+00:00): Hi, I think this was when I was having connectivity problems at my end. I have no idea how the MK change ended up in this changeset - you are right, it is unconnected to the NL changes. I guess I forgot to start a new changeset when switching focus. I'm not sure what you mean by proposing to delete "it", but as far as I am concerned the specific change to the way you mention is a correct change, but I will recheck it.
Sorry for the botch, and thanks for bringing it to my attention!
Cheers,
Colin
PeterPan99 (2024-09-09 20:08:04+00:00): Hi Colin,  
Thanks for responding so promptly and cooperatively.  I now understand that the way that I am concerned about should not have been included in the changeset in NL, but that you still consider it to be a valid object.
It seems that I did not adequately explain my concern, so I will try again:
My concern was that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356789767 was tagged as: “landuse=forest” (despite being a linear way and not an enclosed area) and  “name=Wellsfoot Island” (despite it being in Milton Keynes and a G**gle search suggesting that Wellsfoot Island is on Dartmoor.
I see that you have since edited it again to revert it to being a section of admin boundary.  Thank you for your help. 
Cheers,
Peter
osmviborg (2024-04-19 11:42:58+00:00): Korrigeret med:
lanes=1
oneway=no
Taya_S (2024-04-19 11:30:46+00:00): Aub ophouden met de namen veranderen. In osm schrijven wij de hele naam uit. Niet de afkortingen
eggie (2024-04-19 11:40:15+00:00): PB gestuurd met het verzoek om te reageren..
Mvg
eggie
Taya_S (2024-04-19 11:42:41+00:00): Alle 44 changesets zijn terugedraaid.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-19 11:40:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Borowskie Gziki":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1214765055
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1274070932
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1274070934
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1274070935

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Leo Slager (2024-04-19 15:40:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-04-20 10:15:00+00:00): Dag dennis,
Je hebt hier een adresnode van de kaart verwijderd en het adres toegevoegd aan de landuse van de school.
Dat is niet de bedoeling.
Het is goed om te weten dat gebouwen en adressen rechtstreeks worden geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG van het Kadaster.
Ik zal die adresnode even terugzetten.
Taya_S (2024-04-19 12:03:05+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150220426
Taya_S (2024-04-19 12:03:06+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150220426
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-19 12:00:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Majscowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11830400005
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11830400006
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11830400007
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488462928
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488462944
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488463637
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488463645
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488463650
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488463660
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488463662
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488463664
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488463669
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488463719
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905061565
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905061648
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/942779415
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/942779417
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/942779418
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/945425091
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/945425092
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/945425093
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/945425094
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/945425095
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/945425109
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1105507282
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1105507287

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
adiatmad (2024-07-31 06:19:11+00:00): Hey topius! Hope you’re doing great. I noticed a lot of buildings tagged with "layer"—is that common in PNG? Or could it be referring to building levels? Thanks!

>> (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1OZt)
>> (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer)
>> (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level)
topius (2024-07-31 13:11:38+00:00): I know that one user uses layer to micro-map building parts (if a roof has a different shape than the rest of the building). But I guess most of it is happening in ID editor, when two buildings overlap, it gives you the option to tag one as higher than the other, and creates a layer tag.
adiatmad (2024-07-31 13:17:44+00:00): If that's the situation, I plan to remove that tag layer, particularly from the recent earthquake project work. What’s your advice on this? Appreciate it!

>> (https://jarmokivekas.github.io/hotosm-collate/app/?textSearch=&campaign=&country=Papua+New+Guinea&organisationName=Open+Mapping+Hub+Asia-Pacific&interest=&orderBy=id&orderByType=ASC&projectStatuses=ARCHIVED%2CPUBLISHED%2CDRAFT#)
tekim (2024-04-19 14:12:44+00:00): Hello, Thanks for your edits to the map!  You cited Google Earth as one of your sources, unfortunately, when editing OpenStreetMap we are not allowed to use Google Earth, Google Maps, or Google Street View due to Google's Terms of Service.
tekim (2024-04-19 14:13:38+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150226178
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-05-08 12:16:21+00:00): Chào bạn, tại sao bạn lại hạ road class từ secondary xuống tertiary vậy? Đây là cầu nối trục chính giữa 2 quận lớn với nhau.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-05-08 12:18:54+00:00): Không thể nào là tertiary được. Bạn vui lòng tôn trọng tính trung thực của dữ liệu này vì nó còn ảnh hưởng rất nhiều đến dữ liệu chỉ đường, thuật toán tìm đường.
RedGreenBlue09 (2024-05-23 18:42:31+00:00): Lý do rất đơn giản: Cầu Ba Son lúc đó là tertiary nên đường dẫn lên cầu cũng là tertiary. Secondary là không hợp lí.
BCNorwich (2024-04-20 07:17:05+00:00): More duplicate highways!
Filip009 (2024-04-22 10:57:04+00:00): Zdravím, pre zahranatenie budovy je tu klávesová skratka "Q", alebo pravý klik na budovu a tam je to v možnostiach. Prosím opravte si to :)
Taya_S (2024-04-19 12:16:59+00:00): I was hoping using way[!"air_conditioning"] as filter would make the reverter ignore the 3 objects in Disneyland. Seems I was incorrect
Taya_S (2024-04-19 12:20:30+00:00): fixed in 150220864
Taya_S (2024-04-19 12:26:07+00:00): Correction 150221126
ydubras (2024-04-19 17:42:38+00:00): Certo é. Seguirei este método en próximos casos de dous lugares con poboacións combinadas no censo
Monchinho (2024-04-19 21:21:36+00:00): Un saúdo, compañeiro. Avanzamos pouco a pouco! :)
Taya_S (2024-04-19 12:34:52+00:00): Hi, these trampolines you added, have been mapped as a publically accessible playground. I assume that this is not the case and that rather these are private property. If thats the case, please add access=private

Also please do not delete houses that have source=BAG on them only to redraw them later. Firstly this removes any history on the item and secondly, all houses in the Netherlands are imported from an official source.

Sincerely,
Taya
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-14 02:26:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1165170985 - czy ta budowa się zaczęła?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-19 12:30:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11830437301
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/942779416

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
BCNorwich (2024-04-20 07:33:19+00:00): Yet more duplicated sections of highways!
DaanLT (2024-04-19 13:14:40+00:00): Hi, please do not add things that do not exist anymore, more info: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/147178669
silversurfer83 (2024-04-19 20:02:47+00:00): Gude :)

Ich nehme mal an, hier dürfen nur die Fahrzeuge von Rewe tanken?
Falls ich das richtig sehe, wäre es vielleicht für andere Kartennutzer hilfreich, wenn dann entsprechende Eigenschaften vergeben werden.
Falls sie nichtöffentlich ist, schlage ich "access=private" sowie passende operator und description tags vor, damit nicht jemand mit wenig Sprit im Tank verärgert vor dem Betriebstor steht ;)

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150222478
BATTLEBOTS_BOI (2024-05-10 00:12:02+00:00): If someone knows how to revert the changes so the Rye borders are correct, please do.
literan (2024-04-19 16:39:39+00:00): вот это здание - неоклассицизм???
https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CDVJIX1k

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45768164/history#map=19/55.75599/37.63500&layers=N
JuChu (2024-04-19 16:47:03+00:00): Лишний тег, исправлю. Спасибо!
literan (2024-04-19 16:50:02+00:00): там стоял корректный тег, и вы его заменили на этот. Я исправлю.
JuChu (2024-04-19 16:56:00+00:00): Как скажете
Leo Slager (2024-04-20 09:50:06+00:00): Dag Valeryia,
Er is hier geen sprake van gescheiden rijbanen. De wegen waren dus correct ingetekend.
Bovendien werden zes routerelaties beschadigd.
Ik zal deze changeset reverten.
Leo Slager (2024-04-20 09:56:01+00:00): Reverted with my changeset  150255169
Valeryia_Yak (2024-04-22 14:03:47+00:00): Hello Leo! Thanks for the feedback. I really made a mistake with these roads and relations while changing the geometry of this intersection. Thanks a lot! I'll be more attentive to this next time. Best regards, Valeryia.
LudovicG (2025-06-11 13:14:56+00:00): Bonjour,
Il n'y aurait pas une erreur sur le node 8438528077 ? passé de parking vélo à commerce de caravanes !
Leo Slager (2024-04-19 16:02:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
marc__marc (2025-12-10 09:10:04+00:00): Bonjour,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11830839694
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11830839700
J'ai l'impression que les 2 ne font qu'un et se nome Jean Lain Occasions Spoticar
https://occasions.jeanlain.com/nos-concessions/jean-lain-occasions-spoticar-seynod
est-ce qu'il y a des nouveaux bâtiments à l'endroit du marqueur ? car sur l'imagerie sat l'établissement est plus au nord, et le marqueur est sur le parking.

PS: source=vu armchair -> source=survey :) et/ou survey:date sur les objets pour retrouver les objets pas vu sur le terrain depuis longtemps

Cordialement,
Marc
Urbis13 (2024-06-06 06:04:04+00:00): Hello,
I am seeing that you have inserted the name "DINAclub Stazione di Ricarca e-Bike" in this charging station. Are you sure about that ?
Because when I mapped the charging station I am pretty sure that it was an electric car charging station and not one for e-bikes
Vinber-Pro (2024-06-08 16:29:55+00:00): Bonjour,
j'ai retiré le nom, il n'est pas permis de mettre des infos personnelles !

à plus
FroschForscher (2026-01-24 13:22:21+00:00): Hallo Wolfgang Holtz heißt der Foot-Court hier "ohne Namen" oder ist er ohne Namen?
Wolfgang Holtz (2026-01-24 18:03:56+00:00): hat keinen Namen. Gäste diverser umliegegender Gastro-Betriebe sitzen dort.
NeisBot (2024-04-21 09:34:04+00:00): Hello okolobasik, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
silversurfer83 (2024-04-19 20:16:53+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

Danke, dass du hilfst die Karte aktuell zu halten.

Zu dieser Änderung hätte ich Fragen/Anmerkungen:

- du hast bei dem Punkt (node), der den Ort Bickenbach symbolisiert die Haupteigenschaft (tag) entfernt. War das ein Versehen?
(ich hab das wieder rückgängig gemacht)
Falls es Absicht war, würde mich interessieren, warum.

- Es ist eher ungünstig in einer Änderung quer durchs Land zu hüpfen. Bearbeite bitte ein möglichst eng gefasstes Gebiet, speichere deine Arbeit und gehe dann zum nächsten Gebiet, wo du Dinge ändern möchtest.

- Erkläre bitte besser, was du warum änderst. Es hilft anderen deine Arbeit besser zu verstehen und hilft auch dir später besser nachzuvollziehen, was hier passiert ist.

- Wenn du Fragen hast ist praktsich rund um die Uhr jemand da um zu helfen. Chagtgruppen und Forum sind immer da.

Details zu meinen Anmerkungen liefert das Wiki unter folgenden Links:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice


happy mapping
silversurfer83
goldrute (2024-04-20 14:51:12+00:00): Hallo siversurfer83,
Vielen Dank für die Nachricht. Ich wohne in Bickenbach an der Bergstraße und habe dort einen neuen Eintrag erstellt. Dieser Eintrag wird auch korrekt in der Karte dargestellt. 

Wie ich den Punkt node in Bickenbach Engelskirchen gelöscht habe, ist mir vollkommen unklar.

Bitte entschuldige und herzlichen Dank für die Nachricht 
goldrute
silversurfer83 (2024-04-20 15:05:54+00:00): Alles Klar :)

danke für die Rückmeldung.

Bitte nicht abschrecken lassen und weiter viel Spaß an der Karte
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-19 14:40:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311240248

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
marczoutendijk_repair (2024-04-19 20:39:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150240047 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
mcliquid (2024-04-19 15:42:48+00:00): Ich hab noch ein paar Tags per Wiki ergänzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150230381
seewäldler (2024-04-19 19:55:27+00:00): Danke, klingt besser so, einmal für die Anzeigentafel als solches und einmal für die ÖPNV-Haltestelle. Nur das tourism=information finde ich ein bischen seltsam, sind es doch sicher eher die Einheimischen, die mit der Information was anfangen. Aber schaden tuts sicher nichts so. Mal schauen, wo die Anzeigetafeln noch  überall im Stadtgebiet auftauchen.
maestro_alubia (2024-04-20 17:55:15+00:00): Also in this street there is no bus lane and public transport is not allowed to go in the opposite direction. The signs clearly only allow this for bicycles.
zz1234 (2024-08-14 13:43:44+00:00): Ist fast richtig.
Das temporäre Tempolimit beginnt/endet am östlichen Ende an der Kreuzung mit der Lindenstraße.
Der Abschnitt Lindenstraße bis Frankfurter Str. ist permanent 30
maestro_alubia (2024-04-20 17:53:53+00:00): There is no bus lane and busses are only allowed to go in one direction. The signs are pretty clear, only bicycles are allowed in the opposite direction.
BCNorwich (2024-04-21 06:50:18+00:00): Warnings of problems given above, please correct if possible.
kakulczak (2024-04-19 14:57:18+00:00): I don't know how to mark path as closed