piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2024-03-26 16:05:27+00:00): Zal eens spieken. In het Kadaster werkt het zo... Wanneer iets niet op maaiveldhoogte zit nemen ze het niet op. Bv balkons en overkappingen.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=afrikalaan+135&objectId=0484200000031054&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=104908.40165024903&geometry.y=459134.5500091739&zoomlevel=15.288

De BGT geeft het ook zo aan, mar die nemen nog weleens overkappingen mee. 

Bij periodieke updates ben je je eigen wijzigingen toch weer kwijt.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=afrikalaan+135&objectId=0484200000031054&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=104908.40165024903&geometry.y=459134.5500091739&zoomlevel=15.288

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-03-26 16:08:41+00:00): Die balkons staan niet staan dan niet in de BAG, want het zijn overkappingen op een niveau hoger.
wanlwanflawfnalwfn (2024-03-26 16:11:21+00:00): Aha oke, dan zal ik het maar zo laten :) thanks voor het uitzoeken
gileri (2024-03-26 18:15:22+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour cette contribution !

Le contre-sens cyclable s'arrête bien au milieu de la rue Rogert Bréchan ? Ou continue-t-elle plus loin que ça ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1195563851
PierreBagliottoGeographe (2024-03-27 19:28:04+00:00): Bonjour, non c'était un oubli de ma part. Il est bien sur toute la rue. J'ai fait la mise à jour. Merci.
gileri (2024-03-27 20:33:54+00:00): Super, merci beaucoup !
eggie (2024-03-26 16:12:25+00:00): Dag Duncan..
Paaltje staat goed. 
Je commentaar
Er zijn paaltjes geplaatst dus er kunnen geen voetganger meer doorheen 

Ik heb motor_vehicle= no verwijderd
Dat is default.
Die tag kan ook problemen geven voor bv moped en mofa. 
foot=yes en moped en mofa en bicycle=yes zijn default.
Groet
eggie

MVG
eggie
Frans S (2024-03-28 11:52:30+00:00): Thanks for mapping here.
You did not use the correct tags for highways. Please read this article

Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
One of the validator jobs is to reviews the taggings of highways .  Experience earns that traces of highways are regularly wrong tagged.

How to decide when a trace is a path or an unclassified highway (main choices in rural areas)
First, look what they connect.  Houses, settlements, villages. Then measure the width of that trace.

In iDeditor 

Shortcut : Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle  opens measurement panel
Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.
If a trace is max 2 meters wide, tag it as a path.
Wider and connect hamlets, houses and villages should be tagged as unclassified.
Tag residential in urban areas (villages, towns)

In JOSM, use the measure tab or, draw a circle (round building, shortcut Alt-Z when the building plugin is installed)) between the shoulders of a trace and read the distance on the lower toolbar. (don't map that bulding)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
This is mentioned about tracks on the
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routing#Routing_considerations

Quote: Tracks are roads of agricultural purpose. They usually connect fields to farms. The surface sometimes makes them inaccessible for regular cars, or at least limits the speeds to a very slow pace. Tracks should always be avoided for through-going traffic or within urban areas.

Best regards
HellMap (2024-03-27 17:18:40+00:00): Šajā izmaiņā ir daudz kļūdu. Piemēram, savienoti laukumi un ceļi, kas nav jāsavieno; pārvietoti laukumi no oficiālajām kadastra līnijām; nodzēstas pareizas teritorijas; nodzēsti ēku punkti; izdzēsti ceļi; atvienoti ceļi; laukumi iezīmēti pāri upēm, ceļiem un teritorijām; un citas problēmas.

Šeit ir pārāk daudz kā labojama, tāpēc es šo izmaiņu atceļu pilnībā un izlaboju daļu.
user_20834120 (2024-03-28 06:58:48+00:00): Kas jums ir pa problēmām, cilveki izlabo lai vis izskatitos un butu atbilstošs dotiem datien no būvvaldes un kadastra, a jūs visu sabojājat, tāda necieņa
HellMap (2024-03-28 10:16:10+00:00): Ja tiek izmantoti trešie avoti, tad lūdzu tos norādīt, lai var šādas izmaiņas pārbaudīt. Pretējā gadījumā, atbilstoši kādiem būvvaldes un kadastra datiem ir atvienoti un izdzēsti ceļi, izdzēsti punkti un laukumi, izdzēstas adreses un piebraucami ceļi un visas pārējām problēmas, ko minēju?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability 

Lūdzu vispirms iepazīties ar kartēšanas principiem un tikai pēc tam sākt veikt šādas izmaiņas, un katru izmaiņu atbilstoši pamatot.
richlv (2024-03-28 11:03:21+00:00): Sveiki drtzdrfh, rakstu kā OpenStreetMap datu pārvaldības grupas darbinieks.

Vai varētu, lūdzu, norādīt kādu konkrētu vietu, kur veiktas izmaiņas saskaņā ar būvvaldes datiem vai kadastru, kura pēc tam būtu sabojāta?

Ja Jūsu rediģēšana ir saistībā ar pašvaldības pienākumu veikšanu, varbūt varam vienoties par tikšanos klātienē attiecīgajā pašvaldībā?
user_20834120 (2024-03-28 16:07:15+00:00): Labdien!
Paldies "Hellmap" par ieteikumu, pārskatīšu un vērsīšos pie jautājumiem.

Atbilde RichLv: nekas nav saistībā ar pašvaldību, viss balstīts pēc online pieejamiem datiem un lokālās zināšanas pēc izbraukumiem,
richlv (2024-03-28 16:15:15+00:00): Liels paldies par atbildi, izklausās burvīgi - prieks par aktīviem iedzīvotājiem.

Ja rodas kādi jautājumi vai citas ar kartēšanus saistītas tēmas, tās laipni aicinām apspriest Latvijas OSM kopienas čatā - https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
map per (2024-03-27 09:21:22+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Hab noch "So" zu "Su" und "geschlossen" zu "off" gemacht, damit die Öffnungszeiten Maschinenlesbar sind (Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours). Ansonsten sieht die Änderung gut aus, danke!
balchen (2024-04-03 12:51:04+00:00): Hei. Er det noen grunn til at du har merket g/s-veien langs Smeaheia (parallelt med Sykkelstamveien) som footway med bicycle=yes?
gormur (2024-04-03 13:00:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1027497771/
Denne du tenker på?
Tja. Det er en gang- og sykkelvei. Da synes jeg det passer bra med nettopp footway og bicycle=yes... Spesielt når det er en dedikert sykkelvei vedsidenav som da vil få høyere prioritering i routing ?
balchen (2024-04-03 13:13:29+00:00): Gang- og sykkelvei skal i norsk standard tagges highway=cycleway foot=designated.

Dette er fremdeles en g/s-vei som skal gi tilgang til lokalområdet. Jeg vil håpe at rutere tar den korteste veien eller mest sykkevennlige veien hvis man skal forbi, og hvis ikke, så må man jo bruke den lokale g/s-veien uansett. At Sykkelstamveien er mer sykkelvennlig enn en g/s-vei burde være ruterens jobb å forstå, ikke vår jobb å feiltagge.
gormur (2024-04-03 13:27:23+00:00): Javelda :)
balchen (2024-04-03 13:40:21+00:00): :)
Romwriter (2024-03-26 21:19:23+00:00): Hallo Chriztoph und herzlich Willkommen bei Openstreetmap! Zu dieser Ergänzung habe ich gleich eine Frage: Handelt es sich um ein Bauwerk, oder eher um ein großes Plantschbecken? Beste Grüße, Romwriter
Chriztoph (2024-03-27 18:52:41+00:00): Hallo! Vielen Dank für die Willkommensgrüße!

…Oh nein! Ich vermute schon, worauf Du hinaus willst. Die Pools sind natürlich große Planschbecken und somit auch keine ‚feste' Flächen - geschweige denn Gebäude. Ich werde sie wieder löschen.
Tatsächlich wohne ich genau in dem Viertel und kann ziemlich genau sagen, welche Pools 'fest' sind. Die lasse ich dann in der Karte, richtig?
Liebe Grüße Christoph
Romwriter (2024-03-27 21:52:48+00:00): Hallo Christoph, vielen Dank für die prompte Rückmeldung! Ja, genau so würde ich differenzieren -- nur die "festen" Flächen in die Karte, nicht die Gegenstände, die alle paar Monate umgeräumt werden. Tut mir leid, die Erfassung hat bestimmt viel Arbeit gemacht! Viele Grüße, Romwriter
Chriztoph (2024-03-28 12:51:06+00:00): Hallo lieber Romwriter,
ich habe die Planschbecken wieder entfernt. Ich möchte mich nochmals für Unannehmlichkeiten entschuldigen.
Die Pool, die ich stehen gelassen habe sind fest installiert, d.h. mit Holz / Steinumrandung, festem Filter und stehen jetzt seit mindestens sechs Jahren an Ort und Stelle. Das weiß ich zufällig, weil ich beim Deichverband arbeite und wir uns in diesem Abschnitt um die Entwässerung kümmern - ich bin schon durch jeden Garten gelatscht. Diese Pools können bleiben, oder?
Liebe Grüße Christoph
Romwriter (2024-03-28 15:24:24+00:00): Kein Problem, danke für Deine Mühe. Ich bin einverstanden! Herzliche Grüße, Romwriter
joost schouppe (2024-08-05 10:36:20+00:00): Hi multimob,
Just curious: what made you decide which parts of the network in Charleroi is metro and which is tram? Curiously, just a small part of the "metro leger" stops are marked as subway, and none of its lines are...
multimob (2024-08-06 10:10:55+00:00): Hi there!
This is a fully underground station, like a metro station but the vehicles going here are trams. Picture here
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marabout_(métro_léger_de_Charleroi)#/media/Fichier:Station_Marabout.JPG
There are 10 stations in Charleroi like this, station=subway is used there. I had checked other cities with underground trams like Brussels and Köln.
Do you think there is a mistake with this? We can change it.
joost schouppe (2024-08-06 14:49:33+00:00): Thanks for the explanation! Looking at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapbox-labels-brussels-premetro-as-train-stations/103555/8 and https://matrix.to/#/!SqvNXrBsvdGHYRyota:matrix.org/$172285421141776uFktT:matrix.org?via=matrix.org&via=matrix.domainepublic.net&via=nitro.chat I think what you did is the consensus approach
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-29 22:52:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150683754, 150683768 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by user who did not reply to any changeset comments
Baloo Uriza (2024-03-26 17:11:36+00:00): Hold up.  Are these changes you're making actually reflective of the ground truth now, or are you importing a map of what it will be?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149185573
Ryan E Howell (2024-03-26 17:26:36+00:00): These are all ground truth now. We've been doing a massive trail renovation for 2 years now. We got two more years to go. We've added 25+ miles of new trails and many older trails are no longer there.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149185573
totera (2024-04-19 22:09:45+00:00): Ciao f_gonella, hai aggiunto "Alva" al nome Thomas Edison, ma non è riportato né dai cartelli né dall'ANNCSU
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-27 02:44:23+00:00): Outdated imagery used
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149186902
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-27 02:46:20+00:00): fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149202119
ElliottPlack (2024-03-27 01:00:09+00:00): Hi there. I'd just recently surveyed the new roadway alignments at the eastern side of the Key Bridge. I'm not sure who did it, but a lot of the roads have been mapped to outdated imagery. Bing is best here. Would you please take a look at the area just west of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1263119636 and make sure it lines up to Bing? 

Thanks,

Elliott
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-27 03:45:46+00:00): fixed
anastasia_ (2024-03-26 17:02:05+00:00): + source: y.pano
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-22 15:30:37+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1266534392/history has shop = beauty_salon that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=beauty_salon ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=beauty ? If yes, what is the difference?

Should we document this shop value as distinct, valid and useful?  Or maybe it is so obvious duplicate that I should have replaced it with an automatic edit rather than making a note?
bpw85 (2024-12-22 17:45:18+00:00): Fixed it, thanks.
BertMule (2024-03-31 18:39:43+00:00): Is not appropriate for just 2 installations, and no distinct boundaries

Otherwise, use (part of) the fence as boundary.
mcliquid (2024-03-31 18:52:12+00:00): Where is it written how much play equipment a playground needs as a minimum?
BertMule (2024-04-14 18:20:59+00:00): The point is to only use areas if there are dedicated boundaries.
mcliquid (2024-03-27 07:34:12+00:00): Hello and thank you for your contributions in Vorarlberg! I would really appreciate it if you could leave the playgrounds as areas in the future. We already changed this from Node to Way here in Vorarlberg a few years ago in an extensive MapRoulette challenge, so it would be a shame if that were to be reversed. Thank you!
BertMule (2024-05-19 19:11:44+00:00): As I said at the Madlenerhaus, it makes more sense to only use an area if there actually IS an area, with some physical boundaries like a fence, sand, rubber tiles, or whatever.
Not just the presence of 1 or 2 isolated toys.
BertMule (2024-05-19 21:51:05+00:00): Or in general.
- Only create an area if there is a bound area.
- Don't phantasize one as an approximation.
mcliquid (2024-05-20 06:27:29+00:00): Can you send me the Wiki page where it says that? Thank you
Filip009 (2024-03-26 21:15:32+00:00): Zdravím, spravil ste z budovy celú autobusovú stanicu. Opravil som to na prístrešok autobusovej zastávky.
Hufkratzer (2024-03-26 21:26:30+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1266575974 does not look like a riding center (tag leisure=horse_riding); it looks like a riding arena. In OSM riding arenas riding arenas are usually tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1021147514. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aleisure%3Dhorse_riding
yelisey90 (2024-03-27 09:07:45+00:00): thnx!
Hufkratzer (2024-03-26 21:39:28+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1266576925 does not look like a riding center (tag leisure=horse_riding); it looks like a riding arena. In OSM riding arenas riding arenas are usually tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/881079228. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aleisure%3Dhorse_riding
Xvtn (2024-03-26 17:42:45+00:00): Sorry, got a little carried away with this one! Haha
Frans S (2024-04-23 15:20:40+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149188744
OddlyAngled (2024-03-27 01:38:30+00:00): the western service road added here crosses over Porcupine Creek a couple times, is that accurate?
jmarchon (2024-03-27 16:13:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for getting this name fixed.
michel60 (2024-04-16 07:37:05+00:00): Bonjour,
Il ne faut pas scinder les rond-point pour les route bus sinon cela oblige de vérifier toutes route passant par ce rond-point. C'est très fastidieux.
Il faut inclure le rond-pont entier.
Le GPS fonctionne avec les rond-point entier alors les route bus aussi
Cordialement Michel
michel60 (2024-04-16 07:39:46+00:00): Bonjour
Utiliser GEOFABRIK OSM Inspector pour visualiser les route (bus train tranway)
- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=2.37517&lat=48.60495&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.94&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid
- route en vert => c'est correct
- route en noir => c'est en erreur (continuité, ordre des arrêts, etc)
Cliquer sur la route pour visualiser l'erreur.
Faites en bon usage
Cordialement Michel
michel60 (2024-04-16 07:40:41+00:00): P.S. GEOFABRIK OSM Inspector : mise à jour toutes les 13 heures
H@rrah (2024-04-16 13:17:33+00:00): Bonjour,
Compris, merci pour les conseils !
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-01 07:18:46+00:00): Thanks for update here!
camlewwri (2024-03-27 13:01:54+00:00): According to the BEAR Scotland Southeast webpage (https://www.bearscot.com/se/), their remit includes.

"from A90 Dalmeny leading generally westwards for a distance of 1 kilometre or thereby to A90 Scotstoun Junction/M90 Junction 1."

This hilariously unspecific language suggests that about half of the distance from Scotstoun Interchange to the B924 junction is trunk. I notice there is an overhead gantry at about the 1km mark east from Scotstoun where there is also a change in road surface but no signage to indicate the start of a trunk route
camlewwri (2024-03-27 13:30:20+00:00): I was eventually able to locate the correct location of the start of the A90 trunk section using the OS grid references included in the Transport Scotland document. Changeset here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149225972
yasslay (2024-08-14 11:50:52+00:00): I’ve opened a discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/are-these-edits-to-highways-in-scotland-appropriate/117419 regarding these changes. Please consider providing input. Thanks!

Best regards
arjunaraoc (2024-03-28 04:50:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149250796
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149189931
Frans S (2024-03-28 11:47:38+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
One of the validator jobs is to reviews the taggings of highways .  Experience earns that traces of highways are regularly wrong tagged.
You tagged small paths as a regular around a farm as an unclassified highway.
How to decide when a trace is a path or an unclassified highway (main choices in rural areas)
First, look what they connect.  Houses, settlements, villages. Then measure the width of that trace.

In iDeditor 

Shortcut : Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle  opens measurement panel
Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.
If a trace is max 2 meters wide, tag it as a path.
Wider and connect hamlets, houses and villages should be tagged as unclassified.
Tag residential in urban areas (villages, towns)

In JOSM, use the measure tab or, draw a circle (round building, shortcut Alt-Z when the building plugin is installed)) between the shoulders of a trace and read the distance on the lower toolbar. (don't map that bulding)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
This is mentioned about tracks on the
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routing#Routing_considerations

Quote: Tracks are roads of agricultural purpose. They usually connect fields to farms. The surface sometimes makes them inaccessible for regular cars, or at least limits the speeds to a very slow pace. Tracks should always be avoided for through-going traffic or within urban areas.

Best regards
eggie (2024-03-26 20:10:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Allison P (2024-03-26 19:37:54+00:00): access=private is more appropriate for such a situation. access=no is more for things like military installations and paths that are closed due to erosion. Garden variety prohibitions on trespassing should use private access instead.
Msmollyb (2024-03-26 22:46:47+00:00): Ahh got it - thank you! Will change.
eggie (2024-03-26 20:20:32+00:00): Dag PP  Het zal geen steps zijn in de zin van..  Je zou bridge=yes kunnen gebruiken met layer=1
Nu geeft het een foutmelding.

MVG
eggie
hendrik-17 (2024-06-09 19:42:55+00:00): Moin,

du hattest hier einen Verkaufsautomaten für Milch eingetragen und dabei ein "fixme=please verify" hinterlassen.

Vor Ort ist kein Verkaufsautomat vorhanden, deshalb habe ich den Node gelöscht.

Beste Grüße
hendrik-17
Kimberley H Bagley (2024-06-14 18:44:34+00:00): Why did you mark
Kimberley H Bagley (2024-06-14 18:45:39+00:00): The building (I-Bau) as having 0 levels?
(Sorry for sending it too quickly)
Kimberley H Bagley (2024-06-14 18:50:35+00:00): Same thing for Großhausberg 4 (35814808)
Kimberley H Bagley (2024-06-14 18:52:50+00:00): And for Way: HFU: C-Bau (26951131) #27
thefabi (2024-06-14 19:16:18+00:00): I marked it with 0 levels because I used building parts with the actual building levels to make a 3D version of that buildings. You can view the 3D buildings at: https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=48.0491888&lon=8.2083110&zoom=19&camera.theta=63.671&camera.phi=35.237

More Information about 3D buildings:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/3D
eggie (2024-03-26 20:13:31+00:00): Dag Pjetah

Beter niet wegen vastmaken aan de landuse =residential

Daarom is het gebied van je edits zo groot.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=149192712

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-03-26 20:17:33+00:00): De landuse heb ik losgemaakt.. 
Die kopse langsliggende parkeergelegenheden kun je het beste taggen met
amenity=parking
parking=street_side
orientation=perpendicular
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side
Groet
eggie
フーヴァー　リー (2025-05-14 09:30:37+00:00): 西塘古镇为景点，已标注范围；西塘镇为地名，地点标注在镇政府。单独留了个tourist=attration什么意思？还不如给西塘古镇补补建筑
Allison P (2024-03-27 00:09:42+00:00): I don't think roundabouts are considered links. When I mapped them as links someone told me otherwise. Maybe the guidance has changed.
TheDutchMan13 (2024-03-27 19:30:57+00:00): That's how I usually map them in arizona, it allows you to add Destinations to the link. I might be wrong.
Allison P (2024-03-27 21:11:21+00:00): You don't need to tag something as a link to use the destination key
map per (2024-03-27 09:27:23+00:00): Concerning review_requested:
I moved the Schützenverein to a Node, to avoid having two overlapping buildings on top of each other. Apart fom that the edit looks good, thanks!
d_berger (2024-04-17 07:09:19+00:00): Hi. Hat man im Grubenacker die Signalisation grossflächig geändert? Vor sechs Jahren war dies definitiv SSV 2.13 (motorcar+motorcycle) und nicht SSV 2.14 (motor_vehicle). Bitte nicht nach Bauchgefühl taggen, sondern exakt nach Signalisationverordnung.
Interactiondesigner (2024-04-20 09:28:51+00:00): Erwischt ... normalerweise mache ich alles nach Bauchgefühl, manchmal pendle ich auch aus oder schaue mir Mondphasen an, bevor ich hier Änderungen mache. Das Ergebnis hat dann mehr so eine persönliche Note als exakt nach Verordnung. Was sich mein Bauchgefühl allerdings auch fragt: wenn die Signalisation seit sechs Jahren bekannt ist, warum ist sie dann nicht schon lange längst von dir so erfasst worden?
Interactiondesigner (2024-04-20 09:43:43+00:00): Okay ... der letzte Satz war zu viel. Habe gerade den Änderungssatz von vor sechs Jahren von dir gesehen, wo du den tag hinzugefügt hast. Den tag "motor_vehicle=destination" habe ich nun wieder entfernt.
Frans S (2024-03-28 10:15:36+00:00): Hello. After reviewing your mapping here I have the impression that you are not serious about mapping here.
This is not a playground where you can map/tag everything you want to.
Please keep yourself to the objectives and the way objects need to be mapped.
Follow the mapping course before you map.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149193406