piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rempshaener (2025-04-21 17:20:20+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Ich habe deine Anpassungen durchgesehen und habe ein paar kleinere Anmerkungen.
ref: In das Feld gehört die Hydrantennummer, die oben rechts auf dem Hydrantenschild steht. Interne Nummern sollten – wenn überhaupt – in anderen Feldern aufgenommen werden. Ist keine Nummer vor Ort vergeben oder fehlt das Hydrantenschild, wird ref:signed=no gesetzt. Auch die Verwendung von Tabulatoren im Value ist nicht gerade verbreitet. Am besten wäre es, wenn die ref in dieser Form vollständig aufgelöst würde.
Ein Hinweis zur Geometrie: Hydranten sollen nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden oder anderen Flächen verbunden werden.  Das kannst du aber leicht beheben: im Editor den Hydranten markieren und „E“ drücken.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
Filip009 (2025-03-23 07:00:29+00:00): Zdravím, číslo je lepšie ako do mena "name" dať do referenčného čísla "ref"
sAm6831Tta (2025-03-21 12:02:38+00:00): For example, the Sana'a to Dhamar road in Yemen is at the level of highways due to the more suitable infrastructure and wider road width and having more lanes for vehicles to travel, but the roads in Al-Mahra Governorate in Yemen are weaker and are not at the level of highways. If you disagree with my opinion or have any suggestions, please let me know. I am ready to answer you. Thank you.
kamasytrix (2025-03-21 15:03:18+00:00): Так там вже ж нанесено світофори
kamasytrix (2025-03-21 15:14:36+00:00): аналогічно і на европейська кш(мак), европейська суботний авторинок, як говорить інструкція потрібно вказувати кожен світлофор який встановлено. Але варіант один посередині також маж право на існування (варіант для лінивих). ну в даному випадку виходить дублікат
SPEC1AL1ST (2025-03-21 15:24:30+00:00): К сожалению не все идеально в нашем мире и не все схематично можно отобразить так, как оно в реальной жизни. Лишние удалил
Lezurex (2025-03-21 17:34:11+00:00): Welchen Sinn hat alt_name=Dietikon überhaupt noch? Ich glaube kaum, dass da jemand direkt an den Skilift denkt.
Fijord (2025-04-14 08:52:54+00:00): Soll ich Skilift Dietikon als alt_name nehmen?
Lezurex (2025-04-14 08:56:13+00:00): Ja das würde passen. Dann tauchts auch in Suchresultaten auf wenn man nach "Skilift Dietikon" sucht.
Fijord (2025-04-14 09:20:30+00:00): Für das gibt es den Tag aerialway=rope_tow?
Lezurex (2025-04-14 09:27:06+00:00): Ja beim name-Tag ist es schon richtig, dass da keine beschreibenden Dinge drin sind. Aber aerialway=rope_tow übersetzt wohl kaum eine App in etliche Sprachen und indiziert die Suche damit. Ausserdem ist es ja wahrscheinlich nicht unüblich, dass man in Gesprächen den Lift "Skilift Dietikon" nennt.
NeisBot (2025-03-21 12:09:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-03-28 20:02:20+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164224544
lankapuhelin (2025-04-06 13:11:14+00:00): Mikä tämä lisäyksesi on ollut? Vaikuttaa vandalismilta, osaatko selittää asiaa?
Lezurex (2025-03-21 17:42:31+00:00): Überall sonst auf dem Stadtgebiet wird operator=VBZ genutzt, drum denke ich, sollte das auch hier so bleiben.
Fijord (2025-04-14 08:46:05+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis,  ich habe es geändert.
Luzandro (2025-07-18 16:48:51+00:00): Durch das Verschieben der Ortstafel ist hier eine Lücke zw. den Straßen sichtbar geworden, aber so wie es aussieht, dürften die ways schon davor nicht verbunden gewesen sein: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4862810
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163903993
Luzandro (2025-07-18 17:02:18+00:00): die Ortstafel wurde gar nicht verschoben, aber der Verbindungsnode war nach dem CS nicht mehr Teil des ways
Lezurex (2025-03-21 17:41:56+00:00): Überall sonst auf dem Stadtgebiet wird operator=VBZ genutzt, drum denke ich, sollte das auch hier so bleiben.
Fijord (2025-04-14 08:47:12+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ich habe es geändert.
Hufkratzer (2025-03-21 20:09:59+00:00): Ciao,
the 3 areas you have added here as riding centers (leisure=horse_riding) do not look like riding centers, but like riding arenas; in OSM these are usually tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian.
Example of a riding centre with two arenas and a round pen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83688245#map=18/43.344788/11.266321&layers=P
See also: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)

Im JOSM you can tag the arenas with the preset for sport=equestrian.
Dino Michelini (2025-03-24 08:39:56+00:00): you can consult the source of the information at this link:: https://santacristina.it/en/horse-riding-tuscany/
Hufkratzer (2025-03-24 20:42:27+00:00): Nice website. But what should I do with it? Have you looked at the links I gave you?
mavl (2025-03-21 13:07:58+00:00): Здравствуйте. В названиях улиц статусная часть (улица, переулок) указывается. То есть нужно указывать "Сосновая улица".  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
Князь Коваленко (2025-03-23 05:56:46+00:00): Поправлю
NeisReview (2025-03-24 07:39:19+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges #Test

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
rempshaener (2025-03-21 20:06:06+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Unabhängig davon, ob die Einrichtung eventuell bereits in der Bubatzkarte auftaucht oder nicht:
Statt
social_facility=childrens_centre
social_facility:for=juvenile

würde besser passen bzw. wäre richtiger:
amenity=community_centre
community_centre=youth_centre
community_centre:for=juvenile

Das wird übrigens auch definitiv von der Bubatzkarte berücksichtigt.


Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
Allroads (2025-03-24 16:30:38+00:00): review niet nodig.
SunnyIsland10 (2025-03-27 21:23:32+00:00): Greetings sAm6831Tta,

I have noticed recent updates to road classifications in Yemen, particularly the widespread changes from Trunk to Primary, such as on M100 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204613864). These updates appear inconsistent with the current classification guidelines on the Yemen OSM wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Yemen), which states that roads like M100, M45, and M55 should be classified as Trunk roads.

It’s possible that the wiki is outdated, and was wondering if you have any updated resources or documentation that you're referencing for these changes? If so, it would be greatly appreciated if you could update the wiki with this information.

I appreciate your help and look forward to hearing from you!
SunnyIsland10
Udarian (2025-03-21 18:04:57+00:00): three points here, first next time please leave better change set comments, for more info see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
things like swimming pools and land use are best mapped as areas, please stop adding these as points. third, I doubt that a tennis pitch has a address, that address is part of the building not only for the tennis pitch so please stop adding info to addresses when those addresses are not only pointing to the feature.

Happy mapping,
Udar
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-23 04:06:48+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17436
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-29 02:55:08+00:00): Reverted by DWG - street numbers added from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164233073
Axelos (2025-04-07 13:13:32+00:00): Bonjour,

Vérifié ce jour, la voie verte (représenté par panneau C115) s’arrête toujours sur la limite administrative de Nancy. Cette portion de voie de circulation est toujours accessible aux véhicules motorisés pour accéder aux garages.

Photo : https://broman.fr/divers/temp/osm/photos/IMG_20250407_112704_low.jpg

Axel.
hatul (2026-06-17 14:15:52+00:00): בבקשה לסמן מלונות בתור hotel ולא attraction. תודה.
felipeeugenio (2025-03-21 20:42:46+00:00): Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones.
dos temas
1) por favor no pegar los potreros a los caminos.
2) me imagino que el nombre pertenece al campo y no al potrero mismo. No es correcto usarlo así. en el lugar donde están las casas/oficinas principales del campo agregar place=farm + name=

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163906143
limes11 (2025-04-20 07:21:31+00:00): Hallo, 

in der Form ist die Änderung des highway-Werts nicht sinnvoll. Welche Beschilderung existiert vor Ort?

siehe 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4717711

Danke für's Prüfen und VG
CRCulver (2025-03-24 10:57:07+00:00): Please do not put amenity=fuel and building=roof on the same areas. This is an error and will trigger a bug on the Osmose layer. The reason is that they belong to different layers: fuel is typically layer 0, and roofs are layer 1.
MainFlag0681 (2025-03-24 13:58:40+00:00): Osmose is not god. It may be wrong...

I do not understand why building=roof would need a layer tag?

I don't usually mix amenity=fuel and building=roof. This actually occored in version 1, in 2022. I agree they often should be diffrent elements, however I don't always seperate them. To preserve history, to keep things simple.
CRCulver (2025-03-24 14:26:22+00:00): If you look at the most thoroughly mapped countries, they have converged towards tagging of petrol-station roofs as layer=1, and the amenity=fuel as a separate node or area in the vicinity.

Since you have been editing a very large number of amenity=fuel, you are in a good position to ensure that this tagging is implemented.
MainFlag0681 (2025-03-24 14:33:56+00:00): USA is not one of the "most thoroughly mapped countries"...

"you are in a good position to ensure that this tagging is implemented"

Why would I? I disagree that `building=roof` needs `layer`.

I will try to not add any new cases where `layer` and `amenity=fuel` overlap. Your argument here makes sense, thank you.
CRCulver (2025-03-24 14:54:08+00:00): As you can see from taginfo:

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/building=roof#combinations

Over half of building=roof areas in general now have a layer tag added, and if you consider petrol station roofs, the percentage is likely much higher.

Indeed, the USA is not a thoroughly mapped country, which is why anyone mapping there would do well to look to the countries that are thoroughly mapped, so that the standard of mapping in the USA can be raised towards the level of those countries.
pitfire (2025-03-23 05:59:10+00:00): Hallo Pascal1909,

seid wann hat der Weg: Zeithstraße 27675169 & Wegverlauf: Zeithstraße (899530110) über die gesamte Länge "lanes=3"
Das ist nur in Bereichen mit Abbiegespuren gültig und sollte eine Aufteilung - lanes:forward und lanes:backward erhalten. 

Gruß pitfire
Pawe1909 (2025-05-21 08:54:05+00:00): Hallo pitfire.
Da habe ich mich wohl vertippt - danke für den Hinweis.
LG
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 02:18:53+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165093649
AndersAndersson (2025-03-21 23:39:18+00:00): What are the source for this campsite?
Kookykooky (2025-03-24 05:19:32+00:00): It's from our user, documented with a photo. #mapycz
YuliyaSurta (2025-03-21 13:59:49+00:00): Also fixed road geometry.
Baloo Uriza (2025-03-25 13:14:22+00:00): Looks more like a concrete path since it's not fronting any street for it to be a sidewalk to.  Additionally, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163907905
bikeFVLD (2025-06-04 04:53:14+00:00): Thank you for adding this. Interesting routes
OldManCelli (2025-04-28 20:39:13+00:00): It looks like this edit broke r13737951. Can you please take a look and see if you can fix it? I'm seeing that this multipolygon has an unclosed part.
eggie (2025-03-21 18:39:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 06:11:20+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164575612
NeisReview (2025-03-21 17:10:47+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
KillNazis (2025-03-21 18:07:27+00:00): Hey yeah, I added that spot as a warning to other people that might be in the area. There's a very well written up article about that location. It's a known Patriot front and neo-Nazi training ground over the last 2 years.

https://atlantaantifa.org/2024/01/30/revealed-patriot-front-linked-aryan-tribal-land-in-eastern-tennessee/


I understand if you don't want it marked on the map. I chose zoo because it seemed like the most fitting option for a bunch of Nazis, and I didn't see a known hate group location marker.
eggie (2025-03-21 18:40:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-03-21 18:43:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Gebouwen worden normaliter geïmporteerd vanuit de  BAG. Dat gaat periodiek of via een verzoek op het forum van OSM in het draadje BAG importverzoeken. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-03-21 18:50:19+00:00): Gebouwen heb ik uitgelijnd conform de BGT.
De schuin genomen luchtfoto vertekent.
Gr eggie
yrtimiD (2025-03-21 23:59:02+00:00): Hello and welcome!
Small recommendation if you don't mind:  will appreciate if you can try to modify existing objects instead of deleting old and creating new ones (where possible, of course). This ensures that object editing history is preserved and all edits are easier tracked.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 03:08:46+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164573420
NeisBot (2025-03-21 15:22:35+00:00): Hi omcnoe, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 96% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features!?

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163911237
omcnoe (2025-03-21 15:25:40+00:00): Thank you bot, yes this is intentional deletions.

Before there were 3x overlapping definitions for same Korail residential area, I have kept the most well defined of the 3.
NeisReview (2025-03-21 18:41:46+00:00): 👍 Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional.

#HappyMapping
eggie (2025-03-21 18:51:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-21 15:30:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3376981704
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/931199340

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
GerdP (2025-05-17 07:38:02+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Mir fällt gerade die Kombination maxspeed=100 mit maxspeed:type=sign auf :
https://www.osm.org/way/41309694
Das sollte dann wohl eher maxspeed:type=DE:rural sein
Auf meinem Foto sehe ich aber ein Tempo 70 Schild ungefähr hier: 
52.4943383, 8.5325782
Etwas weiter südlich sehe ich auf der anderen Straßenseite auch ein Schild, allerdings nur die Rückseite. 
Könnte ebenfalls Tempo 70 zeigen oder auch Aufhebung des Tempo-Limits. Wenn aber tatsächlich nur in einer Richtung Tempo 70 gilt, dann bitte maxspeed:forward=70 und maxspeed:backward=100 verwenden.
Ich werde zunächst mal wieder maxspeed=70 setzen (noch in Arbeit).
Bei dem schlechten Zustand der Straße erscheint mir das deutlich wahrscheinlicher.
eggie (2025-03-21 18:52:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
VictorIE (2025-11-16 20:34:57+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16541251/

Is this meant to be part of a larger multipolygon?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 03:16:49+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164573509
wolfgang8 (2025-03-22 14:20:06+00:00): Hallo SirRobiwan,

bitte keine existierenden Tore löschen. Das Führen von Pferden kann bei den entsprechenden Objekten mit horse=dismount eingetragen werden.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:horse%3Ddismount
wolfgang8 (2025-03-24 14:51:06+00:00): CS revertiert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164036844
SirRobiwan (2025-04-05 17:07:51+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis! Habe am Tor horse=dismount eingetragen.
wolfgang8 (2025-04-06 08:49:40+00:00): Danke für die Info - bei der Straße am Kraftwerksdamm und beim Tor am Südufer hab ich es auch noch ergänzt.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164579657
SirRobiwan (2025-04-06 09:14:01+00:00): Perfekt! Danke für die Unterstützung!
wolfgang8 (2025-04-06 12:34:58+00:00): Gerne!
Kugelbaum (2025-03-21 16:52:48+00:00): I like your enthusiasm but there is nothing actually planned. PNM2035 in the "Nordstad" is purely science-fiction at this stage. I don't think this railway proposition deserves to be on OSM.
Lyon-St-Clair (2025-03-21 18:01:39+00:00): ok, I thought that it was more advanced.
Niiepce (2026-01-09 18:36:00+00:00): Hi wies1,
Warum hast du hier einige Adressdaten entfernt? Waren die falsch?
wies1 (2026-01-09 21:40:37+00:00): Hallo,
Puh, das ist jetzt 10 Monate her, so dass ich dazu heute aus Erinnerung nichts mehr sagen kann. Wahrscheinlich waren die falsch.
Gruss
wies1
NeisReview (2025-03-24 07:38:41+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges #Test

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
chulavistagis (2025-03-24 13:11:06+00:00): Hi, regarding the test edits, it was merely for testing purposes and learning the process. Specifically we are interested in the wait time for when an edit has occurred before it becomes live in OpenStreetMap. The wait time is of particular interest to our Fire Department who uses the OSM in one of their apps. These test edits would eventually be deleted. Thanks.
chulavistagis (2025-03-24 17:08:07+00:00): Hi, also a question regarding turnaround time. After making an edit and uploading it, how long does it take to be available to the public. Specifically, the OSM as viewed in Basemaps within ArcGIS Portal, AGOL, and Pro session?
Allison P (2025-03-24 17:19:01+00:00): OSM is a live database. It is not appropriate to put test data in it for any length of time. Changes are available to download immediately, but the basemap layers are updated by the data consumer. Maps pull data at varying frequencies.

If you for some reason need to test in the main database, only add real data, and do not delete it afterwards. Adding bad data or destroying good data is vandalism.
chulavistagis (2025-03-24 17:28:06+00:00): Thanks for the information. Since these are test boundaries, I will go ahead and delete them. As per your recommendation, will only test when real data is available. Also to verify, regarding the ESRI OpenStreetMap basemap, that will be updated at their discretion or schedule, meaning it is not immediate? Thanks.
esmenard (2025-03-22 07:09:52+00:00): Bonjour, quelle est votre source pour dire que la place de la victoire est devenue un parking et la rue Voltaire une zone de rencontre ? Avez-vous vérifié sur place ?
AnatoleFrance (2025-03-22 19:29:33+00:00): Bonjour esmenard,

Vous avez raison, je n'ai pas vérifié l'information sur place, je me suis seulement fié aux images de Google Maps, il s'agit par conséquent probablement d'une erreur de ma part.

Je rectifie ces changements.

Je débute sur la cartographie OSM, merci pour votre retour, je serai vigilant à l'avenir sur les informations déjà renseignées sur OSM et ce que je vois sur Google Street Maps.

Cordialement
DDD丶Samuel (2025-06-14 16:24:45+00:00): 联络线同样属于正线，请将service=siding去掉，并将usage设置为branch，谢谢
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 03:16:50+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164573509
yrtimiD (2025-03-21 18:28:22+00:00): hi, when you mark address as "10-12" - this means 10,11,12, which is a very rare case since 11 is probably on the other side of the road. If building has more than one housenumbers - separate them with a comma ("10,12").
NeisReview (2025-03-21 18:18:39+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
uprkos (2025-07-05 21:45:45+00:00): Czy na pewno kancelaria parafialna w Opolu przy Domańskiego istnieje? 

Zgłoszenie twierdzi że nie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4827659

Na stronie http://opole.cerkiew.net.pl/ też nic na ten temat nie ma.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-23 16:41:05+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12688168890/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
frydzio (2025-03-21 19:22:15+00:00): Cześć,
Ponieważ w OSM główną zasadą jest mapowanie tego co widać na ziemi nie nazywałbym tego trawnika nazwą planowanej inwestycji. Co do samej inwestycji też póki co jestem sceptyczny co do startu w Q4 2025. Znam kilka przykładów gdzie mimo strony internetowej i pozwolenia na budowę prace budowlane nigdy nie ruszyły.