piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ChristopherGS (2024-06-03 14:04:22+00:00): welcome, and thanks for adding this information to the map Carl. i see you added the LMN to the way even though it was already on the node, this duplication is not necessary. since the node is older and since the LMN only occupies the front part of the building, I'm going to remove it from the way but keep it on the node, to avoid redundancy
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-10 21:00:35+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/789663438

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
gscscnd (2023-04-11 09:44:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134760655
olo81 (2023-04-18 15:55:04+00:00): zestaw zmian wywalony w całości
olo81 (2023-04-18 15:54:57+00:00): zestaw zmian wywalony w całości
BCNorwich (2023-04-13 05:47:53+00:00): Hi, For your information you've been duplicating quite a few nodes at the end of hedges, I think I've removed all the duplicates.

Regards Bernard
olo81 (2023-04-18 15:54:51+00:00): zestaw zmian wywalony w całości
olo81 (2023-04-18 15:54:45+00:00): zestaw zmian wywalony w całości
CurlingMan13 (2023-05-20 04:22:09+00:00): Do not incorrectly add trees as buildings. This is not correct. This edit has been reverted in part or full.
CurlingMan13 (2023-05-20 04:46:19+00:00): Reverted/corrected in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136321976
olo81 (2023-04-11 02:20:30+00:00): Jeśli nie ma na tej ulicy znaków b33 znaczy że występuje ograniczenie prawne i inaczej taguje się takie ograniczenie.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:maxspeed

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:source:maxspeed
AllKnower (2023-04-11 06:53:26+00:00): Nie rozumiem, w takim wypadku jak to sie taguje?
olo81 (2023-04-11 07:08:37+00:00): np:
maxspeed=30 i source:maxspeed=PL:urban
olo81 (2023-04-11 07:10:52+00:00): maxspeed=50 i source:maxspeed=PL
olo81 (2023-04-11 07:11:53+00:00): maxspeed=50 i source:maxspeed=PL:urban 
Jeszcze poprawnie dla terenu zabudowanego w PL
olo81 (2023-04-18 15:54:38+00:00): zestaw zmian wywalony w całości
NieWnen (2023-04-11 11:32:10+00:00): Tutaj są 2 lustra?
dyziek86 (2023-04-11 14:06:07+00:00): Tak są 2 lustra na dwóch słupkach.
CurlingMan13 (2023-05-20 04:38:11+00:00): Again, do not add trees/woods as buildings.  This is not correct use of OSM.  Please bare in mind that OSM is used for navigation and emergency response, not just a golf game, so mapping things correctly is important.  This edit has been reverted/correct in part orfull.
user_5359 (2023-04-11 11:54:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/10800216557. What is the mean of the key currency:تومان-دلار ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-21 19:18:06+00:00): name=West Circle Storage
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1161198396

amenity=storage ? Is it simply a shop=storage_rental? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=storage_rental Or is it selling boxes/packaging? Or for storing luggage?
ralley (2023-04-11 00:23:42+00:00): You have changed way 102297848 from a building to a park which appears from aerial imagery to be wrong, was this deliberate?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134750030
Joshua Merriam (2023-05-04 00:33:45+00:00): I added the park boundary, didn't mean to change any building
hafoe (2023-09-12 17:06:44+00:00): Es gibt offiziell keinen Ilsenburger Mühlengraben  hier- bitte keine selbst kreierten Fantasienamen in Umlauf bringen
watmildon (2023-08-26 02:26:32+00:00): Some of these have "addr:unit=Apartment". Do you know if that means something specific to this area or is it a data issue of some kind?
VLD176 (2023-08-28 17:04:54+00:00): Good morning, 
Thank you for the question.
When adding the building polygons to the area, there were existing address nodes (as mentioned in my changeset comment) from a previous import. This tag was added in that original import to most nodes that indicated more than one residence in a building. As I merged, I was cleaning up, to the best of my ability, the tags that were irrelevant as well as clarified the addr:unit=* tag to only include the numbers/letters of the unit. A couple of the tags slipped through it appears, but I've gone through and removed the handful in Newport Beach now. 
For more information on the original address node import, you can visit that wiki page here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Orange_County_Building_and_Address_Import . There is a bit about how they translated the tags from the source to tags applicable to OSM that touches on the appearance of the addr:unit=Apartment tag. 
-Arianna
watmildon (2023-08-28 18:00:53+00:00): Thanks Arianna. I will follow up and dig through the import data a bit to see what (if anything!) needs to be cleaned up. I appreciate the response and link.

Happy mapping!
DeFra85 (2023-04-10 23:12:19+00:00): Würde der Wegweiser "Unterer Teich" denn auch tatsächlich vor Ort umgesetzt?
Galbinus (2023-04-11 10:39:01+00:00): Durch Deine Nachfrage habe ich mir das eben noch einmal genau vor Ort angeschaut. Ich hatte die Änderung gestern entsprechend der Schilderung eines Familienmitglieds vorgenommen, dass sich die Situation vor Ort angeschaut hatte, mir leider aber zum Standort des Wegweisers eine falsche Information gegeben hatte. Der Wegweiser steht tatsächlich an einer unsinnigen Stelle, da die Wanderwege, so wie sie mit Plaketten an den Bäumen markiert sind, weiter östlich verläuft. Eine Mitteilung an die zuständige Behörde wäre insofern sinnvoll. Ich werde jetzt erst einmal in der OSM-Datenbank die nun von mir persönlich vor Ort überprüfte Situation einpflegen. Den Weg am Waldrand, den ich gestern gelöscht habe, gibt und gab es allerdings tatsächlich zumindestens in den letzten 20 Jahren nicht.
AntMadeira (2023-04-10 22:50:07+00:00): Olá, António.
Podes esclarecer-me que monumento é este que adicionaste perto das Garruchas?

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
Antonio Amaral (2023-04-11 06:38:12+00:00): é um memorial à fonte de Garruchas, um equipamento que existiria no local. 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/sfvzj5upthxbfy8/2023-04-10%2009.31.10.jpg?dl=0

Por detrás da roda existe uma placa, a explicar a história, tinha que ver com a dureza que era as pessoas da vila - no festo da colina - terem de descer até ao vale, o estado de degração do que restava desse património, e que tudo foi restaurado (pelo que diz a calçada, no fim do ano passado) a custas da população - não tirei foto dessa placa
AntMadeira (2023-04-11 13:37:41+00:00): Ah, muito bem. Como é novo, ainda não conhecia.
Assim sendo, a etiqueta não está correta. Usaste uma etiqueta para memoriais monumentais. Procura apenas por "memorial" no editor e encontrarás a correta. Sempre que quiseres saber mais informações sobre as etiquetas, clica no "i" do lado direito delas. Nem todas têm a descrição correta ou adequada, mas muitas têm. Também podes mapear os bancos, que é sempre algo útil.
Qualquer dúvida, não hesites em colocar.

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
Antonio Amaral (2023-04-11 13:52:46+00:00): copy obrigado
HansWürstchen (2023-04-11 15:32:05+00:00): Hallo smarties, meinst Du echt dass es so clever ist, einfach blind die, teils Jahrzehente alten, Gewässerdaten des LVermGeo-Sachsen-Anhalt in die OSM-Datenbank zu kopieren, und dann mit Namen versehen, die scheinbar dafür da sind das Copyright zu prüfen, weil vollkommen sinnbefreit, und falsch?
MfG!
Eman_Mehrez (2023-04-12 07:31:17+00:00): Hello Abdullah Al Werfalli;
I noticed you added "oneway=reversible" and this tag will make Routing engines should not route over this type of oneway without knowing about oneway scheduled times.
and if you see KartaView Tracks this street is bi directions and there is no sign to add time for this street.
Link kartaview:
https://kartaview.org/map/@32.14603,23.36245,18z
Link for the street:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26332169
Could you check it, please?

Regards
Eman_Mehrez
welzheimerwald (2023-09-04 22:24:48+00:00): Und schon wieder wurde an Grenzpolygonen herumgemurkst. Bitte in Zukunft unterlassen!
dieterdreist-CAI (2023-07-19 15:31:53+00:00): Buonasera Alberto, ho notato che in questo edit sono stato aggiunti i tags "foot=no" e "bicycle=no" al track way 715736798, mi sembra molto improbabilme perché il percorso fa parte di un sentiero del CAI, mi potresti spiegare la situazione?
Grazie,
Martin
Alberto Lionking (2023-07-19 16:13:39+00:00): Buonasera Martin,
sono stato in quella zona alcuni mesi fa. Mi ricordo di aver "corretto" il sentiero, ma di non aver modificato alcun tags. Se l'ho fatto è stato per distrazione. Comunque ora ho rivisto il tutto e indicato quei tratti accessibili sia a piedi che in bicicletta.
Un saluto
Alberto
dieterdreist-CAI (2023-07-19 16:20:44+00:00): Buonasera Alberto, sei stato molto veloce, grazie per la risposta e risoluzione del problema,

Saluti e buona mappatura,
Martin
dieterdreist-CAI (2023-07-19 16:25:31+00:00): ho notato che sono rimasto "horse=no" e "motor_vehicle=no", ammetto che non conosco bene la zona, ma al meno per i motor_vehicle suppongo ci siano delle eccezioni (per accedere a foreste e campi con i mezzi agricoli), probabilmente invece di "no" dovrebbe essere "private" (autorizzati non specificati) oppure motor_vehicle=agricultural (consentito per scopi di agricoltura) o "forestry".
Alberto Lionking (2023-07-19 16:37:38+00:00): Quel tratto è ancora molto impervio.
Ci sono molti sassi lungo il percorso. Ho lasciato "bicycle=yes" ma pensando solo di farlo in discesa. 
In salita è improponibile.
dieterdreist (2023-07-19 17:07:05+00:00): ci sarebbero tags per la difficoltà, mtb:scale e mtb:scale:uphill https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale
puoi anche non mettere bicycle e altri access tag, il default su track per bicycle sarebbe “yes”, in generale la cosa importante che tutti i tags “access” (compreso bicycle, foot, vehicle ecc.) sono restrizioni legali, non esprimono la idoneità, per questo ci sono altri tag (cai scale, sac scale, mtb scale, ecc.)
mueschel (2023-04-11 17:27:01+00:00): Hi,
please check the tags you added - there are many with a spelling mistake: "destionation"
smithy_dll (2023-04-11 22:10:50+00:00): Thanks, amended incorrect tag names
emersonveenstra (2023-04-12 12:20:51+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for the edits, however, turn restrictions only work if the roads are connected. Since you disconnected the roads, there is no need for the turn restrictions. Could you please remove them? Thanks!
lypeg (2023-04-14 06:51:31+00:00): Hello. Thanks for your review. I deleted the restriction as suggested.
user_5359 (2023-04-11 09:12:40+00:00): Hello! Please check my correction of https://www.osm.org/node/966974761/history
alexey_zakharenkov (2023-04-11 09:50:17+00:00): Of course, you're right. Thank you!
ivanbranco (2023-04-14 07:55:34+00:00): Ciao Enrico, benvenuto su OSM

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9686781668/history

come mai hai cancellato questo ingresso? è stato un errore?

ho visto che hai cancellato attività chiuse, ricordati che se sono ora un locale vuoto in attesa di nuova attività puoi cambiarle in shop=vacant così l'elemento potrà essere riutilizzato quando aprirà quello nuovo :)

buon mapping
Enrico Loki (2023-04-15 08:51:18+00:00): ciao il supermercato ha chiuso attività, cosa mi consigli? rimetto il nodo come shop = vacant?
grazie
zbrown4 (2023-04-15 23:32:44+00:00): Hi craigcilley - you requested a review on this changeset. The modification to a footway looks correct, however, you should also remove the name of this way, assuming that the footpath itself does not have a name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134752674
silversurfer83 (2023-04-11 20:11:08+00:00): Hi there :)
Thank you for contributing to OSM. It is very much appreciated.

Just a few days ago you've been asked in a very friendly comment to please keep your geographically compact. It's quite fine to map all over the world, just please save your changes when you're done in one place and then start mapping somewhere else.
You'll find a short explanation here in the OSM-wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Should you have any questions: We, the community, will be more than happy to help. Please reach out.
Maybe here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers

By the way: These comments are the usual way to talk about our work here. Feel free to react.

Happy Mapping
silversurfer83
hrhino (2023-04-11 00:49:18+00:00): Apparently Google Maps might be where I saw "... & Cafe" however long ago?
numbs (2023-04-28 00:23:49+00:00): Hi Cliffhanger35, and welcome to OSM!
I noticed at the intersection of Rainier Ave and Grady Way you have merged the four nodes at the intersection of each way and replace it with one node. According to the examples from Mapbox (https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-for-navigation/modeling-intersections-for-map-navigation/) and the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Junctions), this is not the recommended way of representing the intersection of two dual carriageways. I suggest you review your changesets and possibly revert any changes as needed.
Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
Thanks,
lijer22
numbs (2023-04-30 05:18:44+00:00): Hi Cliffhanger35,
I have reverted this changeset. I suggest reviewing the wiki to ensure that future changes are in line with the best practices.
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please do not hesitate to reach out.
Thanks, lijer22
itineris (2023-08-22 18:03:28+00:00): Hi,

Why did you do that? You've added a bogus operator (restaurant) to a school.
Benchena (2023-08-22 21:06:01+00:00): I do not want to add mezzo restaurant in the location of school it my be a bug in my computer i was looking for mezzo restaurant in maros utca it wasen’t there few months ago . By the way the school url website is not working .
Regards
vmicho (2023-05-10 18:09:27+00:00): Aaaaaah t'as supprime aussi ici les relations :0
Marc_ch (2023-05-10 23:48:49+00:00): Bonsoir,
la liste des objets modifié par ce groupe de modification est visible juste ci-dessous, il n'y a aucune suppression de relation de ma part.
au contraire, elle étaient déjà cassé avant cette modif, alors j'ai décidé de les traiter séparement, ce qu'apparement tu viens de faire
Salutations,
Marc
Marc_ch (2023-05-10 23:52:49+00:00): ceci dit si ton correctif consiste à supprimer les 2 ways pour les recréer en diviisant le way sans retoucher les relations, je trouve cela un peu absurde étant donné la perte d'historique et le fait qu'il faut attribuer les relations pour moitié dans un sens et pour moitié dans l'autre sens, c'est justement cela le correctif à faire
Marc_ch (2023-05-11 00:06:12+00:00): vissuellement https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10242708#map=19/46.80700/7.15076
le bus de gletterens arrive, prend la branche sens unique vers le rond-point, saute ensuite sur l'autre branche (à contre-sens donc) pour continuer son trajet
j'ai l'impression que le but était simplement de trouver une erreur de ma part tout en en commentant dans l'empressement de pas chercher à comprendre le pourquoi
vmicho (2023-05-11 06:17:58+00:00): Salut. Well...  le moyen le plus sur de splitter est de dupliquer la voie principale en deux 1-way - comme cela on oublie aucune relation - c'est ce que j'ai fait. Au niveau de relation on va en avoir un peux plus - c'est mieux qu'un trou. Mais c'est toujours complique de le faire bien 1ere fois :0
vmicho (2023-05-09 16:14:16+00:00): Aaaaaah t'as supprime les relations. J'ai fixe la voie W. Il reste voie E.
Marc_ch (2023-05-10 23:48:02+00:00): Bonsoir,
la liste des objets modifié par ce groupe de modification est visible juste ci-dessous, il n'y a aucune suppression de relation de ma part.
au contraire, elle étaient déjà cassé avant cette modif, alors j'ai décidé de les traiter séparement, ce qu'apparement tu viens de faire
Salutations,
Marc
vmicho (2023-05-11 06:10:24+00:00): Oui, j'ai deja corrige qqs-unes. Main il en reste plusieures je pense. C'est parfois bien, mais parfois les 2 lignes one-way sont ajoutees sans relations :]
Allison P (2024-06-22 08:09:21+00:00): The names are back.
Enock4seth (2023-05-20 15:29:53+00:00): how sure are you this road exists https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1161152172 ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-21 09:37:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10800537218/history - is this building still existing?
user_5359 (2023-04-18 17:59:38+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1tWK. What ist the mean of the tags
AREA_KM2 = 1525.142
CD_MUN = 2917334
NM_MUN = Iuiu
SIGLA_UF = BA
What is the source and the license of this source?
bdwz (2023-06-20 21:49:02+00:00): Hello, please do not make "map art", or add features that do not exist in the real world just to create a display in the renderer. This is not good for most applications that use OpenStreetMap data. | 霍洛先生,请不要做“道歉”,或增加在真正的世界中不存在的特征,而只是在使人中制造一种表现。 对使用开放式Street Map数据的大部分应用来说,这并不好。. | Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:%E9%9D%A2%E5%90%91%E6%B8%B2%E6%9F%93%E7%BB%98%E5%9B%BE
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134754431
bdwz (2023-06-20 22:16:42+00:00): 您好，請不要製作“地圖藝術”，或添加現實世界中不存在的功能只是為了在渲染器中創建顯示。 這對大多數使用 OpenStreetMap 數據的應用程序不利。
Enock4seth (2023-05-20 15:31:01+00:00): when you map a multipolygon don't tag the inner building too as building=yes, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1161233472
Warin61 (2023-05-28 23:50:21+00:00): Bing shows the Falcon St Offramp as a bus lane ..Not under construction... The DCS Base Map maybe more upto date. The Maxar imagery is more upto date.
smithy_dll (2023-05-29 09:32:14+00:00): It was definitely under construction when I drove through a couple months ago. I found showing the construction zone this https://media.caapp.com.au/pdf/0r965h/83316a39-75eb-478b-9d70-3c22f9187e95/Cammeray%20%26%20Neutral%20Bay%20upcoming%20work%20notification%20%28December%202022%29.pdf
Warin61 (2023-05-30 07:45:44+00:00): Humm... the issue is that some bus routes use that buss off ramp ... presumably they go around the construction ...  in that pdf  it says 
"Access will be maintained via the Falcon Street and Miller Street off ramps."
Maybe there are only taking the area between the bus off ramp and the expressway?  Looks to me like the lane otherwise the buses would stop.
JohnHk (2024-04-06 00:20:19+00:00): It seems you accidentally broke the website tag on "Jensen Alvarado Historic Ranch and Museum (919370923)" with this changeset.
Dion Dock (2024-04-09 04:26:29+00:00): Weird; not sure how that happened.  I put the original website back.
DaveTO (2023-04-25 20:53:21+00:00): Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Dyes for usage of this tag.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-11 04:50:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358282528
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/881549187

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bartgron (2023-04-11 05:21:38+00:00): Poprawione :)
DaveTO (2023-04-25 20:52:57+00:00): Tagging ways as bicycle=yes or bicycle=no based is meant to indicate whether cycling is legally allowed or not, not whether we personally find it suitable for bicycles.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Dyes
tux67 (2024-02-08 09:43:38+00:00): Du hattest hier ein fixme dran. Kann diese dependance auf disused?
reigi (2024-02-08 10:01:51+00:00): ja, kannst du machen. Aktuell gibt es lt. Filialübersicht auch noch keinen neuen Standort https://www.volksbank-heinsberg.de/ihre-volksbank/filialen-ansprechpartner/filialen/uebersicht-filialen.html
tux67 (2024-02-08 15:14:29+00:00): ok, erledigt
OddlyAngled (2023-04-11 05:00:59+00:00): trail updates around the GTW and eastern Sequoia, added bridge details, Volcano Falls and a few more buildings
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-11 05:20:54+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259724568
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1059085760

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bartgron (2023-04-11 05:25:39+00:00): Poprawione
Fischkopp0815 (2023-04-11 08:04:29+00:00): Was ist deine Quelle?
Nach meinen Infos ist das "Casino am Hafen" ist seit Anfang 2022 geschlossen. Für Ende 2023/Anfang 2024 ist der Abriss von Am Hafen 2 geplant
Fischkopp0815 (2023-04-16 10:23:48+00:00): CS revertiert. Casino am Hafen seit 20222-05 nicht mehr vorhanden
Travelfreund (2023-04-16 10:40:08+00:00): Moin Fischkopp0815, bin am Mittwoch am Eingang (an der Hafentstraße) vorbei gelaufen und da wirkte der noch voll im Betrieb. Bin aber nicht rein gegangen, deshalb kann ich es nicht garantieren. Und leider bin ich nicht mehr in Büsum und kann es nicht mehr checken. Was aber auf jeden Fall noch existiert sind 1 oder 2 kleine Läden an der Ecke Hafenstraße / Am Museumshafen. Die habe ich aber nicht eingetragen.
Fischkopp0815 (2023-04-16 12:10:31+00:00): Moin,
Das Casino habe ich gestern überprüft,es ist geschlossen. Die 2 Läden  wurden auch 2022  geschlossen. Der Abriss von Am Hafen 2 verzögert sich aber auf Ende 2023/Anfang 2024.Darum haben da aber für die Saison 2023 2 andere Läden eröffnet
Geim (2023-04-29 14:48:07+00:00): Are you sure this is correct? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1161260677
It's over 40m long.
Rogoyski (2023-05-02 20:30:53+00:00): O co chodzi z rodzajem stacji SKP? Czy "Podstawowa Stacja Kontroli Pojazdów" to jest ten rodzaj? Klucz name na pewno nie jest w takim razie właściwym miejscem na tę informację.
Grzegorz_Kujawa (2023-05-03 19:06:31+00:00): Stacje kontroli pojazdów, zgodnie z ustawą, dzielą się na podstawowe i okręgowe. Nazwa, z podaniem rodzaju stacji, musi widnieć na niebieskiej tablicy przy każdej stacji, a ta właśnie ma nazwę "Podstawowa Stacja Kontroli Pojazdów". Podmiot gospodarczy, który obsługuje daną stację, nie jest tu najważniejszy, dlatego przeniosłem go do klucza operator.
Rogoyski (2023-05-03 20:10:44+00:00): Skąd wiadomo, że ta ma nazwę "Podstawowa Stacja Kontroli Pojazdów"? Jako źródło changesetu podałeś ortofotomapę.

Poza tym to, co napisałeś o nazwie stacji na niebieskiej tablicy, nie jest prawdą. Właściwe rozporządzenie (Dz.U. 2006 nr 40 poz. 275) mówi, że "stacja (...) powinna być oznaczona (...) szyldem
barwy niebieskiej z białymi napisami, zawierającym co najmniej: kod rozpoznawczy, określenie rodzaju i godziny otwarcia stacji". Nie ma mowy o nazwie.

Mów wniosek pozostaje więc jasny: "Podstawowa Stacja Kontroli Pojazdów" to nie jest nazwa tej stacji, tylko rodzaj.
Grzegorz_Kujawa (2023-05-03 20:42:40+00:00): Byłem na miejscu, mam stempel w dowodzie. Ortofotomapę mam ustawioną jako podkład w aplikacji, stąd domyślne źródło danych.
Dobrze, że znalazłeś rozporządzenie - fakt nie ma tam słowa "nazwa", ale sprowadza się to do tego samego, że na wszystkich szyldach stacji, które widziałem, było napisane Podstawowa (lub Okręgowa) Stacja Kontroli Pojazdów.
Nie do końca rozumiem, czy uważasz za niewłaściwe dodanie słowa "Podstawowa" w nazwie, czy ogólnie nazwanie obiektu SKP? Wiele stacji jest tak zmapowana, aczkolwiek istnieje też tu duża dowolność, patrząc na wyniki overpassa.
Rogoyski (2023-05-03 22:54:23+00:00): Uważam za niewłaściwe umieszczenie w nazwie słów PSKP (lub OSKP). Jest są określenie gatunku obiektu, które w równym stopniu pasuje do dziesiątków innych stacji, a nie nazwa tego konkretnego obiektu.

O tym, że mamy do czynienia ze stacją kontroli pojazdów wiemy już z tagu amenity=vehicle_inspection. Niektórzy maperzy koniecznie chcą mieć nazwę na każdym obiekcie, więc niepotrzebnie przepisują największy napis, jaki zobaczą na szyldzie/tablicy, ale nie każdy taki napis to od razu nazwa własna.