piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
eggie (2024-06-11 20:56:59+00:00): reverted own changeset
martien-176 (2024-06-16 19:13:04+00:00): Well mapped but please take care to always square your buildings after tagging them by pressing ‘q’ on your keyboard.

When we are ‘free-hand’ drawing buildings it is impossible to avoid creating corners that are irregular (not right angled). In reality most buildings do have right angled corners and we need our mapping to reflect that. Accurate building footprints are important because building sizes are often used to estimate population sizes for an area to conduct humanitarian activities.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152561561
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-11 21:10:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10834046068

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Strubbl (2024-06-12 15:51:04+00:00): Hi Splette, weißt du, ob das Restaurant so nochmal wiederkommt? Falls nicht würde ich noch die restlichen veralteten Tags, wie die Kontaktdaten, entfernen.
Viele Grüße
Splette (2024-06-16 14:45:15+00:00): Hallo Strubbl, Du hast Recht. Der Inhaber aus Niepars hat wohl vor, ein Restaurant in Stralsund zu eröffnen, nachdem ihm die Miete in Pantelitz auf das Doppelte erhöht wurde. Ich werde die Kontaktdaten entfernen.
Mal gleich 'ne Fachfrage: Wie kann man aus einem Gebäude (Fläche), das nicht mehr existiert, eine Adresse (Punkt) machen, damit die Historie erhalten bleibt.
Vielen Dank und viele Grüße von Splette
Strubbl (2024-06-16 18:29:35+00:00): Gute Frage. Ich glaube, das geht nicht so richtig, weil way und node verschiedene Objekttypen sind. Vielleicht kannst du die Frage nochmal im Forum stellen? Die anderen Mapper wissen vielleicht mehr.
mcliquid (2024-06-25 08:30:35+00:00): Hi, bei der Achbrücke bin ich mir unsicher ob man das wirklich als Gehsteig bezeichnen sollte. Hier passt weder ein Rollstuhl / Rollator drauf noch ein Kinderwagen. Für mich ist eine solche Konstruktion eher ein Bordstein als Schutz damit Autos nicht ins Geländer fahren. Alternativ wäre eventuell aber auch ein sidewalk:both=limited und sidewalk:both:width=0.4m oder ähnlich. Was meinst du?
AlexanderF (2024-06-25 21:42:23+00:00): Hallo, wir haben den Gehweg auf der Seite fussaufwärts benutzt und den würde ich auf mindestens 1m Breite schätzen (wir mussten nicht hintereinander gehen, maximal etwas versetzt). Für einen normalen Kinderwagen oder Rollator sollte das reichen, für einen Rollstuhl kann ich es nicht sagen. Der Gehweg auf der anderen Straßenseite sah deutlich schmaler aus, für einen einzelnen Fußgänger ausreichend, aber wahrscheinlich nicht für einen Rollator oder Kinderwagen geeignet.
John-O (2024-06-12 07:42:46+00:00): There are a large number of validation errors today on Edinburgh bus routes which I suspect may be due to some of your changes. For example:

{"relationID":946200,"name":"Bus 5: Hunters Tryst =\u003e The Jewel","validationErrors":["ways are incorrectly ordered - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/482837515","ways are incorrectly ordered - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/482837515","ways are incorrectly ordered - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66111779"]}



Editing bus routes using the iD editor is generally a bad idea because it's not been programmed to understand them. I'd recommend something like josm instead.
iiBus (2024-06-12 16:01:24+00:00): Thank you for this. I'm not seeing these error myself, if you could point me in the right direction?
I am personally more comfortable with the iD editor however I will bare this in mind.
iiBus (2024-06-12 21:18:42+00:00): Update - I have looked into this and it would appear this was an existing issue before I made adjustments as it affected an area I didn't change. I have now rectified it.
iiBus (2024-06-12 21:22:16+00:00): If there are any other examples of this error, could you send these (or let me know how I can spot these issues)?
eggie (2024-06-12 07:30:58+00:00): Vraagje voor het forum denk ik..
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43
JAAS (2024-07-09 17:08:08+00:00): Hola muralito,

Perdona que te insista con este tema. Sigo con mis dudas acerca de tantos datos que has borrado recientemente en UY. De acuerdo a este `Changeset 152562947`, se sospecha de un "mass deletion" en donde se editaron 24,314 cambios al mapa de un plumazo... definitivamente algo que levanta la ceja y me hace pensar qué: o te encontraste con un foco muy grande de datos malos (muy cuestionable), o cambiaron totalmente la nomenclatura de nombres de calles o algo muy significativo para merecer ese trato. ¿No es factible que sólo les hayan cambiado los nombres a las calles, pero que la numeración secuencial de las alturas se encuentre correcta (o algún otro dato) que se pudo haber rescatado de la masiva edición? ¿Entiendes mi duda al respecto?; creo que es válido el cuestionamiento. 

No es que dude de lo que has hecho, solo necesito entenderlo un poco más a fondo, por favor. Como dices: no lo has agarrado como algo sistemático, pero deberás admitir que si es algo intenso!

Te mando un fuerte abrazo.

Saludos,
Jorge Aguirre - JAAS
muralito (2024-07-12 13:46:15+00:00): Hola Jorge. Claro que entiendo tus dudas. En los intercambios que tuvimos ya hace unos años ya plantee mi discrepancia con la consistencia de calidad de esa importacion, que no es uniforme, en algunas zonas esta bien, muy bien o hasta perfecta podria decir, pero en otras es mala o muy mala.

Los numeros de puerta que elimino son porque el problema es que esos numeros de puerta que están cargados en OSM no existen en la realidad. No se si el problema se origina en el conjunto de datos primario o en el proceso que usaron para cargarlos, pero lo concreto es que estan mal.

Por otra parte, creo que en el analisis completo de mi cambio tienes que analizar no solo los nodos que elimine, sino tener en cuenta los que no eliminé en ese mismo bbox, porque es un trabajo a conciencia para confirmar cuales son los datos erroneos y eliminar solo esos. Como dato concreto, este changset borra unos 1400 nodos de direccion, y persisten 5976 nodos de dirección en esta localidad que no se borraron https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1O7p

Saludos,
M.
fortera_au (2024-06-11 23:28:55+00:00): This is clearly a pool and not a pond.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152563508
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 22:28:25+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 152381711, 152381831, 152381894, 152381914, 152381949, 152381994, 152382064, 152382130, 152382181, 152382200, 152382236, 152382314, 152382407, 152382426, 152382497, 152382520, 152382599, 152382622, 152382669, 152382701, 152382746, 152382785, 152382830, 152382884, 152382922, 152382949, 152382997, 152383020, 152383065, 152383109, 152383144, 152383171, 152383227, 152383262, 152383287, 152383308, 152383335, 152383365, 152383442, 152422928, 152423063, 152423096, 152423234, 152423258, 152423287, 152423318, 152423479, 152423559, 152423610, 152423713, 152423805, 152423858, 152423914, 152423981, 152424020, 152424069, 152424082, 152424102, 152424136, 152424192, 152424226, 152424256, 152424304, 152424333, 152424368, 152424395, 152424472, 152424492, 152426874, 152427031, 152427114, 152427235, 152427276, 152477070, 152477084, 152477092, 152477098, 152477114, 152477131, 152477164, 152477181, 152477235, 152477245, 152477254, 152477267, 152477288, 152477302, 152477314, 152477324, 152477335, 152477367, 152477386, 152477394, 152477403, 152477410, 152477425, 152477441, 152477452, 152477478, 152477480, 152477528, 152477544, 152477552, 152477567, 152477583, 152477594, 152477620, 152477646, 152477662, 152477682, 152477690, 152477712, 152477718, 152477728, 152477736, 152477744, 152477757, 152500288, 152500334, 152500362, 152500400, 152500423, 152500457, 152500487, 152500539, 152500559, 152500590, 152500615, 152500638, 152500668, 152500686, 152500807, 152500906, 152500945, 152501060, 152501087, 152501143, 152501208, 152501241, 152501275, 152501296, 152501336, 152501369, 152501386, 152501548, 152501583, 152501623, 152501718, 152501742, 152501886, 152501914, 152502015, 152502038, 152502071, 152502116, 152502168, 152502260, 152502313, 152502341, 152502355, 152502372, 152502400, 152502422, 152502450, 152502482, 152502506, 152502549, 152522917, 152522928, 152522939, 152522972, 152523003, 152523017, 152523035, 152523082, 152523098, 152523127, 152523139, 152523159, 152523167, 152523184, 152523219, 152557917, 152557964, 152557983, 152558022, 152558068, 152558097, 152558180, 152558199, 152558221, 152558235, 152558247, 152558299, 152558310, 152558330, 152558379, 152558413, 152558429, 152558453, 152558469, 152558505, 152558528, 152558547, 152558559, 152558642, 152558684, 152558722, 152558743, 152558762, 152558834, 152558859, 152558891, 152558904, 152558923, 152558945, 152558958, 152558984, 152559008.
seattlefyi (2024-06-12 00:49:33+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edits! I made a couple of adjustments, hope you don't mind. Moved the descriptive name info to operator, and area between the baseball field pitches to grass.
KiloThree (2024-06-12 01:40:24+00:00): Please stop deleting cycleway tags that more accurately describe the conditions than the ways you are replacing those tags with. Sharrows, bike lanes, and buffered bike lanes are fundamentally different from `highway=cycleway`, and removing the detail that those tags provide degrades the usefulness of OSM for analyzing the bicycle network
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152563836
cubbe8 (2024-06-12 01:46:44+00:00): Those bike lanes were previously mapped as bike tracks, according to the OSM Wikipedia page there is no difference in a bike track or a separated cycleway.
cubbe8 (2024-06-12 01:49:45+00:00): And they have been there for over a year
cubbe8 (2024-06-12 01:55:41+00:00): In this edit I didn’t add any cycleways.
KiloThree (2024-06-12 02:10:30+00:00): You did. See ways 1291588530, 1291588531, 426623435, and other parts of Westland Ave
seattlefyi (2024-06-24 04:53:36+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM, and thanks for the making the edit/correction!
aTarom (2024-06-12 06:33:26+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, por favor usa el espacio de comentarios del conjunto de cambios para describir brevemente lo editado, con un "..." no ayuda a entender lo modificado como por ejemplo el
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/582074818/history
a parte de mover el nodo a una posición donde no corresponde el valor de elevación(la anterior localización tampoco estaba correcta), el multivalor de
place=town;locality
deberíamos debatirlo quizás en
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proyecto-colaborativo-referencias-ine/7405
o cualquier otro canal de la comunidad, te parece?
Saludos y disculpa la brevedad
HirschKauz (2024-06-12 17:56:09+00:00): Hi 
please revisit you changeset: what do you mean by "conn=*"

And please do your co-mappers a favor and write a descriptive changeset comment!!

Salut!
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 23:11:40+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 151421330, 151546172, 151546904, 151555019, 151644405, 151668045, 151670273, 151675976, 151676331, 151676477, 151684536, 151684968, 151685138, 151685405, 151696376, 151780025, 151783395, 151785053, 151786466, 151786653, 151790104, 151815849, 151827003, 152446950, 152452493, 152452947, 152453693, 152454461, 152458458, 152459092, 152461541, 152461976, 152463204, 152464253, 152464798, 152466187, 152467186, 152468215, 152469457, 152488534, 152488629, 152519504, 152540225, 152541439.
MxxCon (2024-06-18 01:41:06+00:00): Hello.
Please split your edits into changesets grouped by region. There's no reason for this changeset to contain edits from both Florida and Connecticut.

Also, please write meaningful changeset messages. Writing "." doesn't help others understand what you are editing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152564675
fititnt (2024-06-17 11:48:09+00:00): Olá BladeTC.

Qual o source= para detalhamentos que não é possível saber apenas por imagem aérea, por exemplo como building=school (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1054544049)? E, mesmo se souber que algum ponto dentro dessa área seria uma escola, como, em especial, como conseguiria estimar o contorno exato de uma amenity=school (que englobaria diversos prédios, que podem não estar sob jurisdição da escola), como amenity=school (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291601033)?

Essa região também não tem imagens de rua com licença autorizada para uso na OpenStreetMap.

No aguardo,
Rocha.
BladeTC (2024-06-21 21:27:58+00:00): O Edifico escolar em questão ja existia, como pode ver em seu histórico, o que foi feito foi ter delimitado a area escolar e editado apropriadamente as tags. Pelas imagens aereas pode presumir sem dificuldade qual o terreno englobando a area escolar.
seewäldler (2024-06-12 15:07:19+00:00): Hallo osm-pt-account

Interessehalber, warum passt hier junction=roundabout nicht mehr? Wegen der "Abkürzungsspuren"? Irgendeine Reihenfolge ändert sich dadurch wohl nicht?
osm-pt-account 😎 (2024-07-06 02:56:49+00:00): Please see below https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150321673

osm-pt-account 😎
MxxCon (2024-06-18 01:42:43+00:00): Why did you delete crossing node on one of the ways here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152565074
VLD280 (2024-06-18 22:18:24+00:00): Hi MxxCon, 
The removal of the crossing node here was accidental. Thank you for noticing and re-adding it. I appreciate it!
Warin61 (2024-06-12 00:52:09+00:00): 

Nearmap is not compatable with OSM licence conditions
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NearMap_PhotoMaps

Reverted.
Past edits using nearmap are about to be reverted too. Future changesets too...
ratrun (2024-06-13 15:54:55+00:00): Hi,

this import is of very bad quality as the new ways are not connected with the existing road network. See all the errors in the OSM routing view: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-12.77921&lat=9.98443&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1 . Can you please fix the connectivity issues?
thanks

ratrun
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
literan (2024-06-12 12:40:27+00:00): кривой формат адрески 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
flapnuta (2025-09-25 10:22:57+00:00): Este camino yo lo quitaría https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1070812422
MaestroKissaki (2026-03-31 17:12:44+00:00): saludos, este camino debió haberlo tocado en algún momento pero no lo cree yo. realmente desconozco sobre el camino
emersonveenstra (2024-06-13 17:36:08+00:00): Hi there,

You created two ways with no tags: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291622133 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291622235. Could you please tag those? Thanks!
amacmcgrann (2024-07-22 22:56:21+00:00): Corrected
tyfi (2024-06-12 02:09:40+00:00): This also corrected an instance where Elm Street was called "Elms Street". This was from TIGER originally.
真川　はな (2024-12-09 05:56:23+00:00): 为什么已经有了一个龙观登山步道的关系，又多出来一个叫“龙观登山步道步道”的关系，有什么头绪吗
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:05:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:05:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:05:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:05:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
literan (2024-06-12 12:39:07+00:00): кривой формат адрески 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].