piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2024-12-26 10:27:43+00:00): Es ist doch total egal was die Hersteller dazu sagen. Allgemeine Praxis bei uns ist seit Jahren (!), dass die Dinger wie oben beschrieben getaggt werden. Ist im Wiki auch so dokumentiert. Was du hier machst ist eine abweichende Meinung, die du gerne erstmal im Forum diskutieren darfst.
silversurfer83 (2024-12-26 11:06:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160631969
Eganatha (2024-12-25 15:10:23+00:00): There are some conflict, and disputed boundaries due to its being outdated. Some objects are deleted by mistake; reverting the deleted objects.
𒂼𒄄　 (2024-12-25 20:49:56+00:00): مرحبا بك غيث، شكرا جزيلا على تعديلك، الرجاء منك استخدام تعليق مناسب للتعديلات حيث ان "تم التعديل حسب مشاهدتي" لايشرح او يعطي الصورة عن ماهي طبيعة تعديلك وماذا فعلت، وبذلك سوف تصعب المهمة على بقية المحررين لمعرفة ماهو تعديلك، فالرجاء ذكر تعليق مناسب لتعديلك تشرح به ماذا فعلت ولماذا كي نعرف ماهي التعديلات. شكرا جزيلا لتفهمك.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Jarek 🚲 (2025-01-11 00:32:29+00:00): Hi,
I added the names to sidewalk so that pedestrian routing would give actually useful directions, including the street names to walk down rather than "walk on walkway". Is there a particular reason you don't think they should be there?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-17 22:23:29+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/443863477/history has roof:type = sawtooth that was added in this edit
Maybe roof:shape=sawtooth was intended here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape
Piagno (2025-05-18 06:14:17+00:00): true, thanks, fixed it.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166416716
eggie (2024-12-25 17:19:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Paden die prive zijn hoef je niet te verwijderen uit OSM.
Met welk doel?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
kitsee (2024-12-26 20:36:40+00:00): Hi, I've reverted this because it is the incorrect usage for highway=motorway_junction. This type of node is used to make a motorway exit not entrance and is place as the start of a off ramp. please see the wiki for more info  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=motorway_junction

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160652681
Abijan (2025-05-13 07:06:34+00:00): Is het relevant om de bruggen een naam te geven? Deze naam is vermoedelijk niet zichtbaar ter plaatse, maar eerder een naam voor AWV om op te  volgen. Zijn er andere taggings mogelijk (bijv. alt_name?)
Thibault Rommel (2025-05-13 15:53:21+00:00): AWV gebruikt deze namen soms in haar communicatie. Ook terug te vinden in artikels, bv. https://www.standaard.be/binnenland/in-vlaanderen-staan-dertig-bruggen-op-probleemlijsten/41359701.html.
Het eigenlijk referentienummer dat AWV gebruikt en dat ook op de kunstwerken staat, is gemapped als ref.
vatlark (2024-12-25 15:22:51+00:00): Enjoy your holiday!
Piagno (2024-12-25 16:02:55+00:00): thanks, you too :)
𒂼𒄄　 (2024-12-25 20:41:53+00:00): لماذا حذفت الاسم؟
eggie (2024-12-25 18:15:58+00:00): Dag Maasland  
Goed bezig!
De juiste tag voor een paardenbak is leisure=pitch  met sport=equestrian

De leisure=horse_riding is dan voor het hele erf van een manege.
Meestal zetten we dan de naam van de manege erbij en omdat horse_riding nog niet rendert zou je landuse=farmyard erbij kunnen taggen tot manege gaat renderen.
Beetje op de rand van de waardheid. 

Ik het het aangepast hier naar pitch. 

MVG
eggie
Mathias_ADAV (2025-01-13 15:36:10+00:00): Bonjour Nolan,
je reviens vers toi concernant la modification que tu as apporté de la voie verte, c'est bien un chemin dédié au piéton et cycliste avec le panneau C115 donc bicycle = designated + foot = designated.

Voici le paragraphe dédié à la VV : 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Voies_vertes

Mathias
Henri97 (2025-06-13 14:19:43+00:00): Hallo ee00,

bist du sicher, dass die K3586 eine Fahrradstraße ist? Das widerspricht sich mit der Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzung. Ist dort wirklich ein Verkehrszeichen 244.1 angeordnet?

Grüße
Henri97
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-15 06:41:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12451339727 - why you think it is a toy shop?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-02 07:45:57+00:00): send a PM
lipuma (2024-12-28 13:05:43+00:00): Mooi werk, dank je wel! Ik was een paar weken geleden langs het winkelcentrum gegaan en notities gemaakt, maar heb nog geen tijd gehad om te editen.

Mapse,
lipuma
Thierry1030 (2025-01-12 23:26:39+00:00): regardez sur l'histoire d'un objet https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1251090513/history
c'est OsmAnd_Pieter, mais je ne crois pas qu'il ait agi par mauvaise volonté.
JeroenHoek (2024-12-25 19:17:48+00:00): By removing capacity:motorhomes you are erasing data. Places tagged with that do not permit caravans; only motorhomes. You are now claiming all these places you've edited do have capacity for caravans, but they do not.

What you probably should be doing, is adding capacity=n where only capacity:motorhomes=n is listed, and leave the latter.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 03:49:56+00:00): DWG revert - Google used

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161802836
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 04:00:09+00:00): Please also see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17161
stillhart (2024-12-25 17:51:37+00:00): You are the best 🚀
Piagno (2024-12-25 18:48:19+00:00): thanks ;)
stillhart (2024-12-25 21:05:26+00:00): Editing relationships is hell for me, and always get reverted, so I gave up.
Lezurex (2024-12-26 14:46:55+00:00): Hallo zusammen,
Habe tatsächlich auch gestern begonnen an dieser Note zu arbeiten, hatte da aber den Ansatz mit area:highway genommen, da mir die Verkehrsinseln für separate Highways dann doch zu klein waren. Nach ein paar Conflicts konnte ich dann unsere beiden Lösungen zusammenführen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160640371 Im Zuge dessen habe ich auch die Zebrastreifen akkurater gemappt.

Vielleicht kann jemand von euch mal drüberschauen, es sind viele Änderungen und vielleicht habe ich irgendwo was vergessen.

LG Lezurex
stillhart (2024-12-26 18:23:55+00:00): Danke, für mir gefällt die Situation jetzt wirklich viel besser. Ich fahre da jeweils durch und das entspricht definitiv besser der Realität als vorher. Das man die ganzen Strassenflächen so explizit und auch überlappend mappen kann wusste ich auch noch nicht. Danke nochmals und frohe 🎄
stillhart (2024-12-26 18:29:29+00:00): Nur mal so als Frage, wie würdet ihr folgende Kreuzung verbessern? Ich bin auch da nicht wirklich zufrieden. Ich weiss das Strassen abstraktionen sind, aber da hat es zwei Gleise, eine Strasse in der Mitten, in der Realität sind die Strassen aussen, der Bus fährt in der Mitte, getrennt durch eine Verkehrsinsel. Der 89er Bus zieht von der rechts-abbiege-spur (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1204767491) Quer hinunter zur Uetlibergstrasse ohne jeweils auf der "korrekten" Spur zu sein. Alles schön getrennt durch mehrere Verkehrs und Zebra-Inseln. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304301813
Lezurex (2024-12-26 19:38:34+00:00): Ich sehe da keinen Verbesserungsbedarf, ausser dass die a:h dort per Spur und nicht per highway gemappt sind, was falsch ist. Aber seis drum, das ist rein kosmetisch.

Solange die Spuren überfahren werden können, ist es eine einzige Strasse, sprich ein OSM-Element. Ein paar Meter Verkehrsinsel sind für mich kein Grund, das aufzusplitten, das ist zu wenig.

Der Bus fährt schon richtig, er hat ja ein separates Lichtsignal um links abzubiegen.

Wenn du dort Diskussionsbedarf siehst, kannst du die Note ja reaktivieren: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4527345 Dieses Changeset hier ist dafür der falsche Ort.
Piagno (2024-12-27 20:06:37+00:00): Danke Lezurex fürs bearbeiten ;)
Sieht soweit gut aus.
Diese Kreuzung hier habe ich aufgesplittet, weil die Fahrmöglichkeiten beschränkt sind, das kann man dann relativ einfach in osm umsetzen.
@stillhart bei der verlinkten Kreuzung ist es so, dass es so viele verschiedenen Fahrmöglichkeiten (für unterschiedliche Verkehrsteilnehmer auch noch... Wenn man das umsetzen würde, dann würden zwar die Strassen bis zur Kreuzung besser aussehen, jedoch die Kreuzung selber wäre ein Gewirr an Strassen und beschränkungen, sodass die Nutzbarkeit insgesamt verringert würde.
bc1829 (2024-12-26 16:35:28+00:00): Hi there. I see you reverted a number of my changes, and just wanted to check these.

Firstly, I see you marked Maureen's and Rings & Things as disused again. These stalls are operating in Green Park Station on a regular basis, so I don't think this is correct.

Secondly, I see you re-added the disused shops that I removed. My logic for removing these was that the wooden huts are no longer physically there, but if we want to persist disused amenities indefinitely, even after there is no evidence of them ever existing, that's fine.

Regarding the Brasserie - I see you changed this back from a node to an area. I'm fine with this; I thought I should explain that I just made this change so that the Brasserie was consistent with the other shops inside the Station, and so we didn't have any overlapping buildings. I initially left it as an area, but this led to iD giving me a warning due to overlapping features.

In summary, the only thing I think is incorrect here is the change of Maureen's and Rings & Things to be disused again. I had moved them to their current location and marked them as no longer disused, as they are still open, and have remained in operation even while the station was partially closed for repairs. With that said, I also wanted to check the other changes that you seem to have reverted as I believe I had relatively sound logic for making those changes.

Thanks :)
bc1829 (2024-12-26 16:45:28+00:00): I've just had a look at your other changesets on Green Park Station and they all look good - thanks for doing those.
DaveF (2024-12-27 13:23:35+00:00): Hi
I primarily based my amendments on this post:
https://www.instagram.com/p/DDy4MpgCXWq/

Open only a week, including Christmas. No signs of stalls. Where's the vending machine? Where has Maureen's located during the repairs? I never noticed it when walking through.

The huts are due to return at sometime. Retaining them as disused for the moment as the history of an entity is beneficial.

Reverting back from a way to a node doesn't really improve the OSM database. I wouldn't take any validation software as carte blanche to amend items. If they're overlapping the best solution is to amend them so they don't.
bc1829 (2024-12-30 10:42:02+00:00): Hi -

Thanks for the response. Yes, there are no permanent stalls, but I've seen both Rings and Things and Maureen's operating during the week, even during the closure of the station for repairs. I walk through regularly during the week visiting Sainsbury's.

Maureen's is operating out of a small green marquee. They were in front of the construction fencing near Green Park Bike Station during the renovations (roughly ///fries.trader.crust) but they have now moved the marquee to the far end, where I marked them (roughly ///courier.tolls.found). Rings and Things were operating on the edge of the farmers' market area in the same sort of vicinity, but now have also moved, to the location where I marked them. Not sure about the milk vending machine, which is why I left it as is. Previously it was in the corner of the shelter between Sainsbury's and the station but didn't seem to be in use, but I haven't looked out for it since the renovation finished.

I didn't know the huts were returning; that makes sense.

Thanks for the note re the Brasserie - that makes sense too.
ToniE (2024-12-25 17:19:16+00:00): Ähm, eher zwischen Schlierseer-/Eintrachtstraße im Westen und Balanstraße im Osten.
julcnx (2025-01-04 13:46:33+00:00): Merci Marchoh44 pour ces précisions. Pouvez-vous confirmer que les ajouts de chemins/pistes ont été réalisés à partir d’un relevé sur le terrain ? Si c’est le cas, pourriez-vous télécharger vos traces GPX sur OpenStreetMap afin que nous disposions d’un enregistrement en preuve ? Merci ! https://www.openstreetmap.org/traces
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160611549
voltairovicz (2024-12-30 23:36:21+00:00): Witaj, masz może jeszcze wiedzę odnośnie jakichś starych zlikwidowanych PGRach bądź posiadłościach dworskich wokół Radomia,których śladów nie ma jeszcze na OSMie? Trochę siedzę w temacie i wszelkie takie miejsca staram się dodawać, o ile w terenie nie zostało dosłownie nic albo teren totalnie rozpacelowano i podzielono na działki budowlane. Pozdrawiam
kmpoppe_repair (2025-03-06 19:16:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163298591 where the changeset comment is: Reverting for probable vandalism in Ukraine
houtari (2025-04-26 20:20:41+00:00): I don't think this is OK at all. This seems like a classic "tagging for the renderer" case. There are many different maps, apps and processes using the OSM data and these kind of edits can affect these in different unwanted ways. 

We have the agreed rules in the wiki for a reason. To create a homogeneous data set. If you would like to "bend or change these rules" it would be correct to start a discussion about it eg. on the national forum rather than performing these edits without asking anybody for opinions.

Besides who desides when the bilingual status is "close enogh" for this kind of tagging?  And if this would be OK then why stop at just street names? You should use double names with suburbs, natural features, POI's and practically anything.
lankapuhelin (2025-04-27 07:02:54+00:00): Agree with houtari, we should follow established mapping methods: main language according to the muni's majority language. In any case, according to Wikipedia it's not close to 50/50 anyway: ~53% swe, ~40% fin, and ~7% others
houtari (2025-06-13 18:41:24+00:00): I've now reverted these undiscussed edits.
tv0 (2025-06-16 18:41:37+00:00): I agree with you to some extent, but I must admit that I wasn't thinking about this from the point of view mentioned by "houtari" at the beginning. But more from the point of view of users looking at the map.

Yes, it is fair to admit that a small majority of the population speaks Swedish as their mother tongue, but it is an exaggeration to claim that the Swedish-speaking population is in a clear majority. Some places have done this elsewhere, such as Macau (“city state”) where place names on streets and virtually all other POIs are marked in both Chinese and Portuguese, although the language distribution is much clearer (Chinese is spoken by 80% of the popula). Still, both languages have official status, rather than being counted in terms of number of speakers; this could be compared to Finland, where both Finnish and Swedish have official status. In Finland as a whole, Swedish is spoken as a mother tongue by just about 5% of the population. But do they make a map for the local population, apparently yes, because given these statistics it is essential in a city of 6000 inhabitants to start getting upset that both official languages of the state are taken into account, at least according to you. However, the city of Kristiinankaupunki is bilingual in its official, administrative status. I understand the technical aspect, but in my editing the names in both languages were separately taken into account by the multilingual names tagging, so I would think the technical disadvantage in this case would be minor.
tv0 (2025-06-16 18:44:49+00:00): This is such an interesting topic and it would be great to have more discussion on the forum.
Udarian (2024-12-25 18:46:18+00:00): whats the source for this commit?
adnvadnmbasvdgh (2024-12-25 23:21:04+00:00): https://i395-miami.com/construction-updates/
Udarian (2024-12-25 18:46:11+00:00): whats the source for this commit?
adnvadnmbasvdgh (2024-12-25 23:20:57+00:00): https://i395-miami.com/construction-updates/
Udarian (2025-01-10 21:31:47+00:00): I don't see anything about this on that site
martien-176 (2024-12-29 18:51:50+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. 

Your buildings are well mapped: good location and outline.

One remark: i guess you used mainly Bing for reference. Esri is also available here. There are slight differences between these imageries, but Esri seems more recent and thus more suitable for this location.

Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160612169
martien-176 (2024-12-29 18:57:07+00:00): Forgot to mention: please always add a comment to your changesets, preferably at the start of the comment line. 

Doing that makes it easier for reviewers to immediatly see what you did and possible why.
Yog Sot (2024-12-25 23:39:25+00:00): skasowałem depth, podział na pasy ruchu bo dla wąskich dróg sie nie ustawia
m@rio (2024-12-27 11:49:43+00:00): Czesc Yog Sot,
jasne - te pasy pewnie się kiedyś przy okazji dodawania nawierzchni przykleiły.
Yog Sot (2024-12-27 19:56:50+00:00): rzeczywiście twoje bardzo stare edycje dodawania pasów ruchu pomimo braku malowania
bc1829 (2024-12-30 11:10:49+00:00): One other question - what was the reasoning for deleting way 1345252245 (the pedestrian area)? The wiki describes a pedestrian area as "a road or area designated mainly or exclusively for pedestrians" / "wide expanses of hard surface are provided for pedestrians to walk". I would argue the non-car-park area of the station qualifies as a pedestrian area, as it isn't just a set of linear footpaths. Representing it as a walkable, dedicated pedestrian area makes sense to me, particularly now that the station is represented accurately as a roof over an outdoor space rather than a 'normal' building.
bc1829 (2025-01-06 16:31:54+00:00): Just a quick bump on the above comment. I'm not trying to get it changed back, just want to understand your reasoning.
DaveF (2025-04-07 16:17:58+00:00): "area designated mainly or exclusively for pedestrians"

By your logic the inside of Sainsbury's is a 'pedestrian area'.
tv0 (2024-12-25 18:28:34+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/asutuskeskittymat-suomessa/123379
eggie (2024-12-25 18:18:40+00:00): Dag 2nk.....  Nee gewoon weghalen en laten importeren zodra er wordt gebouwd.
building=proposed rendert ook al zijnde een gebouw.
Wanneer er te vroeg is geïmporteerd gebruil ik wel eens building:part=proposed
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-12-25 18:32:30+00:00): Het wijkje Prinses Catharina-Amalialaan heb ik van construction gehaald. Je school heb ik tegelijk verwijderd.
Zodra ze daar beginnen een vlak landuse=construction intekenen en later om import vragen. 
Evt kun je de naam van de school als description= op de landuse zetten.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-12-25 18:38:00+00:00): Ik heb een opmerking op de kaart gezet
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4563033#map=18/52.290884/4.667591&layers=N
fs_LT (2026-05-28 13:06:31+00:00): macht ein old_name ohne (new) name Sinn? ist dann irgendwie historisch? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12451543172 ... ich kenne das Scharfe Eck jedenfalls
Hungerburg (2026-05-28 17:29:49+00:00): Seit die Bim da gradausfährt hat sich das scharfe Eck aufgehört, nicht?

Andernorts schon "ehem. …" gelesen, aber hier?
Sanniu (2026-03-23 07:46:08+00:00): Hi, can you ad a street name to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186397305 ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-02 13:26:28+00:00): that would be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Danimal_shelter - right?
Dawid2849 (2024-12-25 19:31:52+00:00): w końcu udało mi się do tego zabrać :D

co do kilku działek nie byłem pewny, więc jeśli ktoś dysponuje lepszymi danymi, to może poprawić:

Działki, co do których nie mam pojęcia która część nie wchodzi w skład poligonu:
182003_2.0004.2406/2
182003_2.0004.2407/1

Działki, co do których nie jestem pewny, czy na pewno wyciąłem dobrą część:
182004_5.0001.1063/1
181801_1.0001.1924/1
181801_1.0001.1925/1
181801_1.0001.1926/8

Działka, której nie udało mi się zlokalizować: 182004_4.0003.367/1 (część)
Dawid2849 (2024-12-25 19:35:14+00:00): gdyby ktoś pytał o źródło, to znajduje się ono na multipoligonie
YellowSoul (2025-01-07 09:08:04+00:00): Hallo, wenn du willst, dass der construction tag auch einen Effekt hast, musst du auch highway zu construction ändern. (Habe ich jetzt mal gemacht)
mikiscom (2025-01-07 15:09:59+00:00): Danke.
м1т (2024-12-25 19:36:36+00:00): https://orgp.spb.ru/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/photo_5429456072738990698_y.jpg
aTarom (2024-12-25 19:46:58+00:00): Bienvenido, me puedes confirmar que no es correcto todo el recinto como piscina municipal?
eliminar
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549607294/history
a un simple nodo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12451582337/history
?
ilias_ (2024-12-28 17:04:33+00:00): Mamadou, you can’t put “.” as the title of your changeset. Please put clear titles summarising what you edited!
gnlpfth (2025-01-23 17:21:19+00:00): Hallo,

du hast mit diesem Changeset die gesamte landuse=residential Fläche in den Bezirken 6 bis 9 gelöscht. Ich hab sie wieder hergestellt. Bitte ein bisschen besser aufpassen in Zukunft.

LG
Dornbacher (2025-01-24 06:37:10+00:00): Hallo,

danke für die Nachricht und die Reparatur, war sicher nicht meine Absicht, werde entsprechend aufpassen.
Liebe Grüße
Dimitar155 (2024-12-25 19:58:04+00:00): За английското име "8th December" (български словоред) или "December 8th" (английски словоред)? За месеца ми се струва по-добре да бъде на английски а не транслитериран, но бих искал да чуя второ мнение и за двете.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-25 20:11:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Ogrodzisko":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448710168
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1209915285
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1346220476

"Czechy":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448759319
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1346220474
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1346220478

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-25 20:30:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4369659350
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7865416567
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171024082
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/269003987

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Szymson (2024-12-25 21:16:01+00:00): Nie ma potwierdzenia rezygnacji w 100% z budowy tej drogi - to usunięcie jest do wycofania
Szymson (2024-12-25 21:15:48+00:00): Nie ma potwierdzenia rezygnacji w 100% z budowy tych dróg - to usunięcie jest do wycofania
theDM (2024-12-25 21:16:43+00:00): Masz interpelację.
theDM (2024-12-25 21:17:05+00:00): resztę dróg opisałem na forum, o co tam biega
Szymson (2024-12-25 21:20:00+00:00): "Obecnie nie jest planowana" nie oznacza "Całkowicie porzucono ten projekt"
theDM (2024-12-25 21:22:19+00:00): Tyle, że tam projektu nie było, jedynie koncepcja budowy drogi, ale nic o jej szczegółach, ani nawet przebiegu.
Szymson (2024-12-25 21:23:06+00:00): MPZP uwzględnia rezerwę, jest ona nazwana jako Nowa Kościuszki. To wystarczy.
theDM (2024-12-25 21:27:16+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dproposed

Nie znamy geometrii drogi ani czy faktycznie powstanie. Nie mamy podstawowych informacji, co wystarczy, żeby nie mapować takich dróg.
Szymson (2024-12-25 21:31:31+00:00): Granice działek z MPZP wystarczą do wyznaczenia geometrii jako wypośrodkowana linia. Jak będzie szczegółowy projekt to się to dokładniej wyznaczy.
wildmaps (2024-12-28 03:50:30+00:00): Danke!
Nzau (2024-12-25 20:52:43+00:00): Ajout lotissement en construction
м1т (2024-12-25 20:56:30+00:00): по 07.03.2025
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Santi2222 (2024-12-26 11:20:48+00:00): He revertido este conjunto de cambios, el tramo de la N-622 hasta Letona no es autovía.
Zach777 (2025-11-18 20:32:07+00:00): These four ALPR's no longer exist
lasagna (2025-11-19 00:38:23+00:00): Go ahead and delete them