piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-02-09 16:00:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1475625056 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Furniture Clearance Center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-18 05:34:43+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178708539
(No visible changes after review)
eggie (2026-02-09 19:52:18+00:00): Merged info with addressnode
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-02-10 14:35:15+00:00): Hi! At Villa Maria, I had to remove the footways you added since there is no separate sidewalk, but instead the footway is shared with the road. There is already a foot=yes tag for pedestrian routing. Thanks and have a nice day!
NeisBot (2026-02-09 16:09:45+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1232978713 v2 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1232978714 v1 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/11438822810 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178318970
NeisReview (2026-02-18 05:34:57+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178341877
YomanNH (2026-02-12 09:09:30+00:00): Hej, pamiętasz może, czy jest tam jakiś zakaz wjazdu? Parkingi mają access=private i zastanawiam się, czy tylko parkingi mają odpowiednie tabliczki, czy już na wjeździe na "osiedle" jest znak. Ewentualnie parkingi kiedyś zostały błędnie zmapowane jako prywatne.
I dzięki za zmianę na strefę zamieszkania!
pandamahoniowa (2026-02-12 10:20:33+00:00): Wjechać na osiedle może każdy, tylko parkingi są prywatne (taka tabliczka: https://imgur.com/a/OOBOTF4).
YomanNH (2026-02-12 10:25:02+00:00): Czyli jest ok, dzięki!
SomeoneElse (2026-03-28 00:31:34+00:00): Hello,
What actually is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/163099441/history ?  It was a "planned highway-track" and is now a "proposed railway", but it doesn't connect to anything?
Best Regards,
Andy
小智智 (2026-03-28 00:40:31+00:00): It is a reserved space for new railway tracks, not used at this moment.
Patrick78 (2026-02-10 12:43:02+00:00): Bonjour, Je viens de voir que vous avez fait plusieurs mises à jour sur le réseau Néva sur base il me semble d'une importation gouv.fr. Le soucis c'est que beaucoup d'arrêts de sont pas dans le bon sens et il manque des bouts de routes. On se retrouve avec ici un arrêt de l 'autre coté de la chaussée (ex : Gendarmerie ou Lycées). Bref j'ai du mal à voir l’intérêt de ces mises à jour sans avoir fait une vérification avant de sauvegarder dans OSM. Je pense qu'il faut retravailler ligne à ligne pour remettre ça au propre. Cdlt,
NeisBot (2026-02-09 16:12:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1302134653 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "travel agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-18 05:34:44+00:00): 🤔 The text has been updated, though I’m not entirely sure it’s an improvement.
aTarom (2026-02-09 17:59:53+00:00): Hola, cuando puedas me confirmas que el pico
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1243338454/history
es necesario moverlo?
según el ráster del IGN no es su posición, de ser incorrecto hay que actualizar el valor de elevación, con las coordenadas actuales está sobre los 643 metros de altitud, me dices, saludos.
ReyDerayos24 (2026-02-10 15:24:19+00:00): Hola. Es que hace un tiempo estuve por el castillo de Gálvez, y según me contaron el castillo se encuentra en el cerro de Santa Brígida, me extrañaría que se refirieran a otro. Así buscando rápido, varias url lo confirman: https://listaroja.hispanianostra.org/ficha/castillo-de-galvez-los-castillos/, https://www.abc.es/espana/castilla-la-mancha/toledo/pueblos/abci-castillo-galvez-entra-lista-roja-patrimonio-202203031629_noticia.html, https://turismoprovinciatoledo.es/castillos/castillo-de-galvez/. La de la diputación de Toledo dice "sobre el cerro de Santa Brígida, se pueden ver los cimientos que configuraban la planta de la arrasada ermita del mismo nombre", es decir, que no está en él, pero en ese emplazamiento no parece haber ningún tipo de cimiento. Puede ser que el IGN lo haya puesto mal (hay muchos casos similares), pero como hay duda en esto procedo a moverlo de vuelta por si acaso.
NeisBot (2026-02-09 16:18:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13537193543 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Asian restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
fortera_au (2026-02-09 22:06:38+00:00): The node has also been placed on the road, this should be detatched and moved to the correct location.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178319412
Jordi MF (2026-02-10 20:13:06+00:00): Estas ediciones ya fueron discutidas por la comunidad y se dejó que fueran denominaciones bilingües: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/36
Jordi MF (2026-02-26 19:18:13+00:00): Añado que ni la Ley de Comarcalización de Aragón (https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOA-d-2006-90038) ni la de creación de la comarca de La Ribagorza (https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-2002-11910) afirman nada sobre si los Ayuntamientos deben de aprobar si denominarse de forma bilingüe.
Anonymous36863 (2026-02-09 16:24:29+00:00): + parking
Finn Freitag (2026-02-09 16:33:53+00:00): I'm sorry, the editor used the title from my last Changeset. (I pressed upload, entered the correct title, navigated back to editing and pressed upload again. The title must be overwritten at that time.) I will be more careful next time. Isn't there an option to change the title afterwards?

Real title: Added missing addresses
silversurfer83 (2026-02-09 19:48:50+00:00): Don't worry.

That question came up recently in the forum and the answer is "no". Changeset comments are fixed once the changeset [CS] is closed and uploaded to the database. You can ad a comment to the discussion, just as you did here.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178319956
AndersAndersson (2026-02-09 22:35:55+00:00): Is the path over the dam gone?
wombatmaper (2026-02-09 22:40:08+00:00): ahh nice catch.
No, I was trying to fix two overlaping ways, but accedently deleted one instead of merging. Fixed
AndersAndersson (2026-02-11 15:52:30+00:00): Thanks for fixing this and for improving the map!
felipeeugenio (2026-02-09 19:50:00+00:00): Hola.
Larraín es un apellido que lleva tilde. No entendemos por qué lo saca. ¿O se trata de un error?

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178320252
felipeeugenio (2026-02-09 21:00:14+00:00): En todo caso, el cartel de la calle dice "uno Sur" (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=987147306343034).

Cual es la fuente del cambio de nombre? la foto la saque hace dos semanas.

Saludos
jcnl44 (2026-02-09 17:04:30+00:00): Hello,
I think you made a mistake placing this US address in France :) I let you remove it and locate it correctly?
thehousewashere (2026-02-09 19:23:57+00:00): Sorry about that. I'll remove it right away.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-13 07:02:59+00:00): How this error happened?
Taya_S (2026-02-13 07:24:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/857220320
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/857220320

A mix up of node and way ids it seems.
This way is already tagged with the same address information as was added the node in this changeset.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-12 03:45:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607299922
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/307652313

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-12 04:55:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607299922
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/307652313

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-12 05:45:08+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607299922
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/307652313

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-21 18:15:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1475645947/history w jaki sposób ta trasa jest wyznaczone lub widoczna w terenie?
Zwyklak (2026-06-07 14:51:07+00:00): Dziękujemy za edycję w OpenStreetMap! Zapraszamy do dalszego edytowania naszych map! Można dodawać cudze biznesy nie tylko swoje, tyle że w tagu mame podajemy nazwę firmy, a nie opis
Skróciłem nazwę pańskiego biznesu, pozdrawiam!
AurélienQ (2026-02-15 15:26:02+00:00): Why did you delete the building ? It still exist.
gsperb (2026-02-16 08:59:00+00:00): It is an underground structure, and you cannot otherwise see that there are sports facilities and other amenities on top of it. The essential elements, the underground tracks, are visible.
AurélienQ (2026-02-16 09:44:16+00:00): It doesn't matter that the building are underground. If then, you just have to add the tags 'layer' and 'underground'. It's not because the building is underground that it doesn't exist.

And yes, the OSM basic map show it anyway, but one of the most important OSM rules is : "Don't map for the rendering". In other therms, we don't care of the map, we only care of datas.
gsperb (2026-02-17 07:54:07+00:00): The fact is that the above-ground sports facilities were not displayed.
And yes, it's true: “Don't map for the rendering.” In other words, we don't care about the map, we only care about the data.
But if you take that literally, every map could be displayed in black. The main thing is that the data is provided. 
Just try to see if you can display the building with the sports facilities above it. A map that doesn't show what's visible is worthless. The map doesn't have to be “pretty,” though.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
AurélienQ (2026-02-18 09:45:14+00:00): Well, obviously you don't seems understand how OSM works and what is it's objectives. 
A solution of the problem you describe is that you can create a ticket o github on the page of the main rendering of OSM, asking ti hide building with the tag "underground=yes".

If you still disagree with the way of mapping, I ask you to open a subject on the French forum (forum.openstreetmap.fr)

Have a nice day
Baloo Uriza (2026-02-09 22:10:40+00:00): These seem to include a lot of nonresidential uses like roadways.  Did you mean to map landuse, or were you trying to create administrative boundaries for neighborhoods?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178321923
IlliaDu (2026-02-09 17:20:26+00:00): The cafeteria is now visible on the map, but with the feature request button i can see the node, i think i did something wrong but i am not sure what
IlliaDu (2026-02-09 17:22:08+00:00): as the tags seem the same from different places... Also, i see that OSM has 2 tags for the payment methods: mb_way and mbway. I don't know how to escalate it, but i believe it should be merged within the database
IlliaDu (2026-02-09 17:23:04+00:00): Correction: 
> is now visible
is not visible
InfosReseaux (2026-03-06 12:59:31+00:00): Bonjour Vincent,
J'ai remarqué vos contributions dans cette zone et merci pour l'ajoute de tout ces poteaux !
Je vois qu'ils sont contribués depuis le terrain avec Vespucci, ce qui ne permet pas de tracer les lignes qu'ils supportent.

Tout ca est optionnel mais ca complique la maintenance : j'ai l'habitude de traiter département par département pour ajouter operator=*, la tension et autre.

Serait-ce possible d'ajouter operator=Enedis + operator:wikidata=Q3587594 pour qu'ils soient intégré au suivi national s'il vous plaît ?
https://enedis.openstreetmap.fr

Parvenez-vous à faire la différence entre un poteau électrique et téléphonique sur le terrain ?

Optionnellement et si possible, ajouter les lignes supportées par les poteaux facilite la maintenance. Voir ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Power_networks/France/Aerien#Les_diff%C3%A9rents_types_de_lignes

A disposition pour compléter. Cette vidéo peut aider : https://peertube.openstreetmap.fr/w/uFz73A3QNDsBF8TeV5XheL

Bonne après-midi
Vincent @ (2026-03-06 13:42:02+00:00): Bonjour,

Désolé que cela vous complique la maintenance. Je fais de mon mieux avec les outils à ma disposition, mon smartphone en l'occurrence. Et lorsque Vespucci m'annonce qu'il manque un poteau, je l'ajoute. Sachez que je le fais alors que je ne suis pas toujours sur site. En espérant, qu'à mon passage ou celui d'un autre contributeur, une modification ou une correction sera apportée.

Je vais prendre en note vos indications concernant l'opérateur.

Je sais faire la différence entre poteaux électriques et téléphoniques. Où puis je trouver une documentation concernant leurs représentations svp ?

Merci par avance pour votre réponse.

Cela dit ils ne sont pas pour moi la priorité. Je mets principalement en avant le maximum de points d'intérêts dans ma région (commerces, artisans, tout type d'équipement...) Cela est déjà une grosse contribution.

Je ferai de mon mieux pour contribuer sur ce point à l'avenir.

Bonne après midi.
Vincent @ (2026-03-06 13:50:27+00:00): Je viens de suivre vos liens. A ce que je vois cela représente une tâche de fou et pas très gratifiante.
Du coup à moi de vous féliciter pour vos contributions ;)
Je vais prendre en note tout ça, mais ici les lignes électrifiées ne manque pas. Malheureusement ce n'est pas ma priorité comme évoqué précédemment.
InfosReseaux (2026-03-06 16:34:37+00:00): Merci beaucoup Vincent,

Rassurez-vous il n'y a aucun mal et vous n'avez fait aucune erreur.
On va pouvoir valoriser tout ca dans le pot commun. Le plus prioritaire c'est d'ajouter operator=Enedis + operator:wikidata=Q3587594 sur les poids (il y a des moyens de configurer ca sur Vespucci pour ne pas avoir à le saisir à chaque fois)

Pour la différence entre électrique et telecom, voici :
* Poteaux électriques : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Power_networks/France/Aerien#Les_poteaux
* Poteaux télécoms : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:man_made%3Dutility_pole#T%C3%A9l%C3%A9coms

Pour les lignes, on fera ca au fil de l'eau. Je vais en ajouter certaines aussi au sud de Saint-Amand
SomeoneElse (2026-04-10 09:55:03+00:00): I've deleting https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13536367893/history because it was an allegedly fake locksmith scam.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/allegedly-fake-locksmiths/142942/5
aTarom (2026-04-10 10:22:17+00:00): Thank you so much for handling this. This is the first time I've encountered this type of scam, and I will do everything I can to avoid making this mistake again.
Tomio (2026-02-17 11:47:40+00:00): Lunardi10, essa via particular foi convertida em Rua pública, de forma irregular, sem respeitar as regras da comunidade local. Reverta sua edição.
Tomio (2026-02-17 11:48:43+00:00): Qual a sua ligação com outros editores: Robson Sell e Richard Sell, que já foram notificados pela mesma edição irregular e posteriormente banidos do OSM?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-24 05:17:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224689001/history

to miało być maxweight=3.5, prawda?
Florek89 (2026-07-25 11:09:37+00:00): Tak, nawet nie wiedziałem, że to trzeba z kropką pisać. zmieniłem
NeisBot (2026-02-09 17:46:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13537402081 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Barbershop"
---
Misalnya, versi teks yang lebih netral dan faktual bisa jadi: "Barber shop"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
Albattar 53 (2026-02-09 17:52:41+00:00): Barbershop di sindanglaya bandung timur
NeisBot (2026-02-09 17:51:22+00:00): Hi Tokke_1111, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features.

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178323455
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-09 17:53:34+00:00): Revert of it's own data?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178103825
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-14 15:14:40+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178344441
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-12 05:45:21+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1431518557

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-12 05:45:23+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1475664203

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2026-02-10 16:08:16+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Why do you map/tag a local road as a 'trunk'
Check this website to learn how a trunk can be recognized.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
This road is at best to be tagged as highway=unclassified.
I adjust it.
Best regards
Frans S (2026-02-10 16:12:25+00:00): Hi again.
You tagged a nearly 4-meter-wide trace as a path !
Traces > 2,5 mtr wide are not paths. 

Please take the width of a trace into consideration to decide which tag to be used.
In IDeditor. Open menu on the right, select mapdata, then select measurement. When selected, draw a line between the shoulders of a road and read the distance
Best regards
Kovoschiz (2026-02-10 07:06:41+00:00): You can don't do it yourself. But when it's done, you shouldn't remove it.
Kovoschiz (2026-02-10 08:38:19+00:00): 2. It should be a `=stop` not `=give_way`
vectorial8192 (2026-02-10 14:21:31+00:00): 1. aerial imagery by ESRI and MapBox seem to show a triangle, which indicates a yield sign
2. I was about to say, need not worry too much since soon we will need to map Yuen Long South developments and there will likely be junction upgrades, but I see you have already remade the changeset
kingkingHK (2026-02-11 02:51:26+00:00): 1. While the "STOP 停" markings do indeed resemble a triangle due to the English text being long and Chinese text being slim, with some more effort you can see it looks more like a text than a triangle. You can also see some thick white lines, which doesn't make sense if it is a give-way double dash line. Look at some give-way road markings (e.g. the roundabout to the west) to see what give way actually looks like.
eggie (2026-02-09 19:55:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Die masten kwamen van een bulkimport uit 2009 Daar zal niet veel meer van kloppen.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Rainero (2026-03-16 18:31:28+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179965592
(unzulässige Quelle)
alexey_zakharenkov (2026-03-25 13:14:07+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Вы нарисовали 2 отрезка дороги вместо одного:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1475672704
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1472769095

Но эти возможные траектории автотранспорта ничем не отделены и должны рисоваться одним ребром. Исправьте, пожалуйста.
alexey_zakharenkov (2026-04-02 18:11:29+00:00): Очень жаль, что вы не ответили и пришлось исправлять за вас.
NeisBot (2026-02-09 18:30:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13529443547 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Window tinting studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-18 05:34:45+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178708545
(No visible changes after review)