piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
sembelst134 (2026-05-28 12:19:34+00:00): Ah danke für die Info, das ist absolut verständlich.
Mal sehen wann ich dort mal wieder vorbeikommen, oder jemand anderes es vllt schon anpasst. Wollte nur meine festgestellten Unstimmigkeiten festhalten
LG
Ltrlg (2026-05-23 12:23:17+00:00): Concernant way/758424191, il s’agit d’un chemin « technique » pour avoir une continuité dans les rues (nécessaire pour les applications de routage), pour lequel la notion de largeur n’a effectivement pas beaucoup de sens.

Je l’ai rétabli (changeset/183065681) avec cycleway=link (indiquant sa nature technique), mais je ne sais pas si StreetComplete tient compte de cette information. Vous pouvez ignorer la question si vous repassez dans le coin et qu’elle est de nouveau posée.
Taya_S (2026-05-21 15:23:47+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182981894
felipeeugenio (2026-05-21 14:05:33+00:00): Hello. Please put some time into the drawing, we are not in a hurry. The buildings and forest are almost schematic depictions; we don´t do that in OSM. Some houses were drawn with a totally different geometry than the one observed in the images.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182949295
zuicz (2026-05-31 13:09:37+00:00): W relacjach pociągów nie ma to aż takiego znaczenia, na jakim dokładnie torze zatrzyma się pociąg na stacji końcowej. Wystarczy jedna relacja
Paweł_M (2026-05-31 16:09:25+00:00): Dobrze wiedzieć. Będę pamiętał przy dodawaniu kolejnych relacji PKA, bo tam pewnie będzie podobnie
zuicz (2026-05-31 19:34:10+00:00): Fajnie, że to dodajesz. Podkarpackie jest bardzo ubogie w relacje pociągów regio
rarad74 (2026-05-21 03:45:26+00:00): Hi,
and what happened to the rest of the elements? Why did you move the street, why did you move the residential area. Everything was perfectly aligned. Wherever you work, everything remains crooked...
rarad74 (2026-05-21 03:51:23+00:00): And, a parking space/lot could not be accessed if you not link it somehow with a street/road/service-parking aisle, etc.
Carto_Ferret (2026-05-22 17:43:08+00:00): Hello rarad74,  The edits for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182949745 only involved adding the parking amenity polygon (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1517840097) and removing the highway=crossing tag from node 583892441.  There were no edits to the street or residential polygon.  Carto_Ferret.
citrula (2026-05-21 03:25:07+00:00): did you mean to remove barrier=kerb from every node in this changeset?
VLD277 (2026-05-21 16:46:35+00:00): Hello citrula, 

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. The removal of the barrier=kerb tagging here was unintentional. I have reverted the changeset to re-add the tags. Thank you!

VLD277
jacobwhall (2026-05-21 01:07:00+00:00): Omg, this did not upload correctly. I'll cleanup tonight
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-20 05:29:27+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184339792
fortera_au (2026-05-21 01:06:49+00:00): Revert own revert, misunderstood direction of move

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182952143
MapperrZPolski (2026-05-21 11:12:33+00:00): Czy nie warto oznaczyć jako construction budowanej drogi?
Dawid2849 (2026-05-21 13:03:27+00:00): Warto, ale chcę to zrobić z projektu drogi, a gdy to dodawałem było już późno
Dawid2849 (2026-05-21 22:59:22+00:00): Dodałem
eggie (2026-05-21 07:31:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NoSuchPerson (2026-05-21 04:06:26+00:00): Disconnected way is a foot bridge on a pond.  No path to connect it to.

Crossing paths is from adjust one end of a road but the other end had an old stream crossing.

Will fix eventually.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182954381
Seyruun (2026-05-21 14:10:00+00:00): Hej, it seems you used lines and didn't add tags to most of the buildings. I think those should be areas with tags 'building' or 'house' or whatever. :)

If they're rectangles it's also a good idea to use the 'square' function so they have 90° angles.

Feel free to change any features I made since I trace from satellite data from the other side of the world and have never been there.

Happy mapping! :)
MrLocalFixer (2026-05-21 16:35:19+00:00): Yes Thank you, I added those as houses and also mapped the whole village too. they are not perfect squares, Its very hard to map the exact shape so i haven't mapped perfect perimeter i but tried to be close. 

also you have contributed a lot i have seen (very very nice), so can you please give me a small tip? i would like to map out my streets with my phones location. so is there any good application that i can use? currently i have "osmand" and "vespucci". thanks for your comment.
Seyruun (2026-05-21 19:20:05+00:00): I have only tried osmand for that yet. GPS traces from the ground are super super valuable, so I'm looking forward to it! :)

I'd also be very interested in the village names around this one. I have no clue how to figure them out from here (copying from Google is not allowed and they don't have everything right anyway, at all).
Seyruun (2026-05-27 12:44:01+00:00): (And btw the 'square' option does not make perfect squares, it makes all angles 90° that are close to it - try it!)
MrLocalFixer (2026-05-31 11:36:37+00:00): yup, once again sorry for not responding. I just used JOSM to add almost 90% of the stuff so i did not saw your comments on this and other changeset.

i don't userstand how to use 90 degree thing. in josm there is plugin but in iD editor i can't find 90 degree option but will look into it soon. also you have contributed a lot in this area too. so are you living here out somewhere else. 
please also tell me here or in other changeset that which community you engage with and in which platform.
BCNorwich (2026-05-22 06:22:18+00:00): Hi, I've removed your new highway (Way: Sahebganj - Mehsi Rd (1517885011)), because it duplicates an existing highway and thus could disrupt routing.

Regards Bernard.
rempshaener (2026-05-21 18:28:14+00:00): Hallo,
keine Anmerkungen.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2026-05-21 18:27:23+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Nur eine Anmerkung zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6535352791: Falls der Hydrant nicht mehr nutzen sollten, bietet sich die Nutzung des Lebenszyklus-Präfix (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix) disused:emergency=fire_hydrant an.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
O Fim (2026-07-04 13:49:42+00:00): relações de ônibus ficaram inviáveis apôs inserção de mão unica
ThompsonPlateau (2026-07-07 09:26:40+00:00): Olá, O fim,
Adicionei uma restrição de mão única aqui porque há uma placa de "proibido entrar" visível no Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-20.3465618&lng=-40.315235&z=17&pKey=279768411384498&focus=photo&x=0.03629171110905077&y=0.49665177498438273&zoom=1.1866251343409018); não vi nada que indicasse que ônibus podem seguir para o sul por essa via, mas aceito suas alterações caso decida remover essa restrição.
ThompsonPlateau (2026-07-07 09:30:47+00:00): Hi O fim,
I added a oneway here because there is a do not enter sign in Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-20.3465618&lng=-40.315235&z=17&pKey=279768411384498&focus=photo&x=0.03629171110905077&y=0.49665177498438273&zoom=1.1866251343409018), I didn’t see anything that suggests buses can head south along this way, but I can defer to your edits if you decide to remove this.
nevw (2026-05-21 09:00:28+00:00): There is private parking here and I have re-added it.
felipeeugenio (2026-05-21 13:59:48+00:00): some of you work was deleted during night by other mappers, Now I am changing almost all road classifications you edited. please read the wiki or engage the community on our Telegram chat to ask questions about how to edit. We are here to help, but it is not the idea to review almost all nodes and ways you touch because of the mistakes.
regards and see you in the chat

You can enter the chat in the link in my profile page.

regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182956451
jptolosa (2026-05-21 17:04:49+00:00): intermittent=no and salt=no are default values. They only should be used in situations where is not obvious. In this case are superflous tags.
BholeKiBhasam (2026-05-22 14:29:38+00:00): deleted hmmmm interesting...anyway i have noticed this kind since the day I touched this section of the OSM...sure I will follow up your guidance
BholeKiBhasam (2026-05-22 14:35:05+00:00): glad they did not deleted the stream, i had traced the water shine among the high tree growth, with great caution and followed backward
BholeKiBhasam (2026-05-22 14:38:04+00:00): as of delete ...i had asked other location mappers and they some advanced mappers told that it generally happens where some local mappers see micro mapping as clutter than data and they advised me not to get bothered and just do the mapping as per OSM and you are good from all sides :D thank you for your valuable feedback...
Dimitar155 (2026-05-21 06:33:18+00:00): В момента има два обекта за супермаркета (видимо от двете иконки на картата) с две различни работни времена. Би било добре едното да се премахне.
mavl (2026-06-07 06:02:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183764451, 183764460, 183764431, 183764453, 183764448, 183764459, 183764455 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20768].
joost schouppe (2026-05-21 08:26:39+00:00): Hier heb je een "speeltuin" ingetekend als een park in een ding dat als speeltuin gemapped was. De naam klinkt me ook eerder als een beschrijving. Speeltuinen hebben ook doorgaans geen huisnummer. Op de officiele kaart zie ik hier effectief geen huisnummer. Ik zal wel de openingsuren en de hondeninfo behouden, op de gehele speeltuin.
silversurfer83 (2026-05-23 07:51:47+00:00): Ich nochmal :)

vor einiger Zeit haben "wir" (die OSM-Community) darauf geeinigt, dass einzelne Ladesäulen ein man_made=charge_point (wie bei Zapfsäulen) sind und dann alle gemeinsam eine amenity=charging_station bilden (wenn sie denn zusammengehören).

Grüße

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182957594
DracarysX (2026-05-23 09:15:30+00:00): Super, danke Dir. Ich versuche es zu fixen. In diesem konkreten Fall sind das aus meiner Sicht auch zwei verschiedene EInheiten. Die einen sind Tritium-Säulen, die anderen Hyps. Ich versuche mich mal.
Glassman (2026-05-22 22:05:56+00:00): #TIP: We don't use abbreviated street names in OSM because software has a hard time with abbreviations. Can you expand the name?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182958255
Vlad Ungureanu (2026-05-22 22:14:45+00:00): Hi Glassman, I updated based on your review. Thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182958255
MappingMore (2026-05-24 04:20:01+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:183090934
Gustavo22Soares (2026-05-28 17:05:58+00:00): Oi, tudo bom? qual foi o criterio para  definir essa area como residencial é uma area muito extensa normalmente é evitado definir areas tão grandes como residencial se for para bairro tem outras formas
Vinicius Moraes (2026-07-10 16:09:32+00:00): Olá! Perdoe a demora demasiada.
Eu iniciei um bairro e acabei seguindo para o outro; a região é densamente residencial, de fato, mas é possível melhorar esse mapeamento. Ambos os bairros cobertos (Guabirotuba e Uberaba) são considerados zonas residenciais, com pontos de comércio local que podem ser mapeados com landuse=commercial por cima. Como você me sugere melhorar essa cobertura? Dividir esse polígono em áreas menores, mas cobrindo todo o bairro?
Fraxi (2026-05-21 07:52:51+00:00): Ако "Вековно дърво" е описателно име, има няколко такива в горичката след Княжево на юг
Dimitar155 (2026-05-21 08:51:19+00:00): denotation=natural_monument ми се струва същото като name=Вековно дърво.

Тукашните вековни дървета в Княжево нямат нищо общо с същите в регистъра на ИАОС. Не съм сигурен откъде идва разминаването, но тук има хубава визуализация - https://data-for-good.bg/posts/2022-01-19-venerable-trees-wikidata/ (данните са относително актуални, не гледай датата на поста).
eggie (2026-05-21 07:33:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-05-21 07:35:34+00:00): Tip: shop=bicycle geeft een pictogram op de kaart.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-21 07:21:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2186663353
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429747555

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
HellMap (2026-05-21 10:47:24+00:00): Šis posms https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1518008265 ir tiešām construction?
HellMap (2026-05-22 11:18:59+00:00): Vari lūdzu pārbaudīt, jo šeit navigācija pašlaik ir salauzta.
UrSuS (2026-05-22 12:19:52+00:00): Paldies, izlabots! :)
movaglobe (2026-06-09 17:49:32+00:00): This edit seems to include a lot of non existant buildings? Did you just map with ai tools?
Max-Kritic (2026-05-21 15:39:39+00:00): Liaison Flixbus 755: Béthune, Gare routière → Paris, Gallieni Cassée. A reparer
adamos (2026-05-21 15:52:25+00:00): Hallo, can you tell what is wrong with the route? Relation seems to be right with no issues. Please advise.
Max-Kritic (2026-05-22 12:02:11+00:00): C'est corrigé. Voir https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=2.87458&lat=50.31300&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.87&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
1Raven (2026-05-21 07:51:51+00:00): more specifically added residential areas
eggie (2026-05-21 15:32:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Die toegangsweg kun je gewoon doortrekken.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
rajdhani (2026-05-23 07:47:13+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 183054534
eggie (2026-05-21 15:35:12+00:00): De toegangsweg heb ik losgemaakt van de landuse en een stukje doorgetrokken.
MVG
eggie
stevea (2026-05-24 20:32:28+00:00): Thank you!
santamariense (2026-07-16 21:29:11+00:00): Olá D3yvison (Ameli3),

Vi que você elevou todas as estradas desta região para tertiary. Reserve a tag tertiary exclusivamente para as rotas entre pequenas áreas urbanas, conforme regra de classificação adotada pela comunidade.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/Classifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_rodovias_do_Brasil

Qualquer dúvida, estou a disposição.

Bons mapeamentos!
trigpoint (2026-05-21 10:44:19+00:00): What is the source of this edit. A local has never seen any signs or heard of it 
Have you actually been here?
JBible92 (2026-05-21 12:11:59+00:00): Hi @trigpoint. 

Firstly I would like to state that the addition of the point is something which would be a separate discussion as I never added the label originally. I agree the term "Central Retail District" doesn't necessarily exist in Manchester, and it wouldn't surprise me if the original person who added it coined it from an unacceptable source.

If we were to keep this label, Manchester Council refer to it as the "Retail Core" as part of their regeneration plans, provided in the link below.

http://manchester.gov.uk/planning-and-regeneration/regeneration/central-manchester-regeneration

My original placement was to avoid it being on top of the Manchester Arndale, and to acknowledge that this retail area extends further west also. On reflection after seeing the tiles regenerate, I feel it could be adjusted again more centrally on Market Street, but not on top of the Arndale building. 

Hope the above information provides more context, and apologies for the lack of links on the original edit.
NK10101 (2026-05-21 16:42:32+00:00): Nee fout ik woon bij de wadi
joost schouppe (2026-05-22 07:42:49+00:00): Wat is er precies fout? Of kan je het zelf fixen?
NK10101 (2026-05-23 15:02:28+00:00): Alles, ik heb het al gefixt.
Aim311_ (2026-07-05 16:53:24+00:00): Jak bez przeszkód? Byłeś autem, czy sobie tylko spacerowałeś, a moze tylko planowałeś podóż? To jest prywatne, zamknięte osiedle do którego ruch jest ograniczony jedyniue do aut które uzyskają zgodę na przejazd od wartownika. 

"są dostępne bez przeszkód" Są spore przeszkody żeby sie przejechac lub przejśc rekreacyjnie po tym osiedlu. Byłęm tam wieć wiem co pisze.
Mercanto123 (2026-07-05 18:37:35+00:00): Objechałem całe to osiedle, każdą uliczkę na rowerze. Nie było żadnego problemu, żeby to zrobić.
Yog Sot (2026-07-05 19:14:18+00:00): tak, potwierdzam, 2 miesiące temu, wstep był wolny i brak jakichkolwiek tablic na wjeździe, że jest zakaz lub jakaś prywata ;)
Aim311_ (2026-07-05 21:26:44+00:00): Tak wolny jak przed większością prywatnych terenów fabryk i innych zakładów logistycznych. Przed wjazdami gdzie jest struż rzadko, albo w cale widniej tabliczka teren prywatny, a jednak dla obszarów zamkniętych dla ogółu, z wyjątkiem dostaw i autochtonów dajemy access=private.
Aim311_ (2026-07-05 21:28:28+00:00): Mercanto123 jak wytłumaczyłeś w strózwce swoj wjazd na pojeździe jakim jest rower do tego zamknietego obszaru?
Aim311_ (2026-07-05 21:34:15+00:00): Tam każdy pojad musi uzasadniś swój wzjad czasami w godzinie szczytu korek pojazdów sięga prawie do ulicy Szamotulskiej.
Mercanto123 (2026-07-06 05:04:46+00:00): Nikt mnie o nic nie pytał. Szlaban był podniesiony a w stróżówce mi Pani tylko kiwnęła głową :) Zmieniły się tam obyczaje odkąd tam byłeś ostatnio.
Yog Sot (2026-07-06 18:17:45+00:00): @Aim, to zamyka sprawę? :D
Aim311_ (2026-07-06 21:58:14+00:00): Trudno powiedzieć. Obyczaje na tym zamknietym osiedlu z pewnością się nie zmieniły. 
@Mercanto123 skoro z taką łatwością moze sobie wjeźdzać do tego typu ograniczonych dla zewnętrzynch pojazdów obszarów to możeszcz bardziej szczególowa zmapować te umocnione obszary.
Aim311_ (2026-07-06 22:03:31+00:00): Możesz np spróbować dodać nazwy alejek w tego typu okamerowanym ROD https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1329191171 Nie mam śmiałości tam wjechać, a zarówno na omawianym ograniczonym dla obcych pojazdów osiedlu oraz linkowanym zamkniętym dla ogółu ROD jest identyczny stystem monitoringu.
maro21 (2026-05-21 22:08:12+00:00): Thanks!
PizzaTreeIsland (2026-05-21 08:58:51+00:00): Hi, 
Thanks for adding all those details! The wikidata tag on thr Chifley node was indeed incorrect, what you want to do if you have the wikipedia page is select tools (top right) --> go to wikidata item. Then you copy the wikidata ID (beginning with Q and then a number) into the tag. I already fixed it here. I hope this helps! 
Thanks and happy mapping!
1Raven (2026-05-21 09:02:29+00:00): Thanks for correcting it and letting me know how to do it myself in the future :)
Tom451212 (2026-05-21 08:55:37+00:00): Eclater la maison
silversurfer83 (2026-05-23 07:49:08+00:00): Moin Guenni :)

Gebäude und Wege sollten in Hessen auch immer mit dem ALKIS und dem DOP abgeglichen werden (beides in JOSM verfügbar). Diese sind idR besser ausgerichtet und auch gut aufgelöst.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182963343
AlexSpritze (2026-06-10 09:39:47+00:00): Hi MoeSkeeto,

kannst du dem Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1518064771 bitte noch Tags verpassen? Ansonsten ist er ziemlich sinnlos und sollte wieder entfernt werden.
MoeSkeeto (2026-06-10 12:24:49+00:00): Hey AlexSpritze,

sorry, das hatte ich leider vergessen und soeben geändert. Es ist jetzt eine Baumreihe...

Danke für den Hinweis und schöne Grüße
rajdhani (2026-05-24 23:56:18+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 183131048
kingkingHK (2026-05-21 09:20:22+00:00): Why `barrier=wall` and not `barrier=fence` when "tall metal fence"?

Also, given the service reservoir is under the playground (as implied by the name), I am not sure if it is correct to put the name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1518065298 .
vectorial8192 (2026-05-25 08:29:05+00:00): I am leaning towards "this is between a fence and a wall". English wiki specifically describes fence as "lightness of construction". This is obviously not it. If want to then start global discussion.

afaik there is no other good place to store the name other than this specific service area. At least the name is signposted at gates and walls (albeit with difficulty of observation).

Also notice the playground name is slightly descriptive in nature, which is different from the real reservoir name itself.
kingkingHK (2026-05-25 09:17:31+00:00): I don't understand what you mean by "obviously not it".

The reservoir is below the playground. Imo we should draw it, possibly gluing to the playground, then add the name to it.
vectorial8192 (2026-05-25 11:08:42+00:00): The tall fences are obviously "heavily constructed", so according to the wiki, those aren't fences. The closest would be walls.

I am not gonna accidentally start another map quest, but it seems we don't have such "under the playground mapping" precedence (e.g. see Shek Kip Mei Service Reservoir). This would be something new.
Kovoschiz (2026-05-26 08:05:09+00:00):  "lightness of construction" is vague. It's "not having a solid foundation along its whole length", and "minimal thickness and often open". https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier=fence#Fence_or_wall
vectorial8192 (2026-05-30 14:58:27+00:00): I would imagine this key info should be placed at the top, but OK. Will make follow-up.
vectorial8192 (2026-05-30 15:00:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183404546
rajdhani (2026-05-24 23:56:58+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 183130900
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-21 14:55:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13289411200

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-22 07:14:26+00:00): DWG revert - personal information

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183007593
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-22 07:20:14+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20678
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-22 07:04:17+00:00): DWG revert - personal information

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183007176
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-22 07:11:59+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20677
Senihtu (2026-05-22 04:32:48+00:00): Hi!
Wenn hier ein Tor mitten auf der Straße steht, dann kommt Bus 32 (Relation 4053767 ) nicht mehr zu seiner Haltestelle "Erbach Roßbach Ort".
Ist das Tor zu Fahrzeiten des Busses offen (Fehlt da ein psv = yes), hat sicht die Busstrecke geändert oder ist das Tor erst hinter der Haltestelle?
Gruß
Senihtu
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-22 07:26:48+00:00): DWG revert - personal information

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183007994
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-22 07:32:14+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20679
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-22 06:42:30+00:00): DWG revert - personal info given out

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183006413
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-22 06:54:29+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20676