piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MxxCon (2025-05-22 18:29:08+00:00): Hello.
You tagged this building as a fire station and then disused? 
Could you please elaborate what are you trying to map here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166326815
mikeocool (2025-05-22 19:29:28+00:00): It’s an old unused fire station. 

The building architecturally is a fire station and has a BFD (Brooklyn fire department?) engraved on it, but appears to the currently be empty.
MxxCon (2025-05-22 18:30:50+00:00): Hello.
In this edit you also mapped multiple buildings as single features. They should be split up.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166326903
mcliquid (2025-05-19 07:37:44+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
mcliquid (2025-05-19 07:35:16+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
edihoo (2025-06-23 21:29:49+00:00): Grüß dich und danke für den Hinweis.
Ich schau, dass ich mich in Zukunft a bissl besser zusammenreisse ;-)
b-jazz (2025-05-18 16:24:26+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1365420593

Hello Avprex,

As I mentioned in a previous comment on your changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163508500), fairways and greens shouldn't intersect/overlap like they do in the fairway mentioned above. Please refer to the wiki mentioned in those comments for how to map fairways and greens properly. Thanks.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-05-16 10:51:46+00:00): Pourriez-vous expliquer l'objectif? Il n'y a pas de prolongemnet de la ligne verte prévu. Les données d'OpenStreetMap doivent rester réelles et non fictives.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-05-16 10:53:40+00:00): Je vais devoir reverter. Vous avez ajouté une ligne par-dessus la ligne existante, ce qui crée une duplication erronée.
CAM-Gerlach (2025-06-29 08:07:41+00:00): Seems like StreetComplete is bugging out here—all the modified ways were *already* tagged with both sidewalk=separate and sidewalk:both=separate, and all SC did was remove the (valid, as a graceful fallback for consumers that don't have full support for the newer/more detailed sidewalk:side) sidewalk=separate tag. I've reported the error to StreetComplete: https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/6378
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166327264
Glassman (2025-05-16 19:49:30+00:00): The out door seatting looks like it has a roof so you could also add the tag, building=shelter.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166327486
TheNightRider (2025-05-16 00:58:06+00:00): Meant to say "Updated details of Supercharger station"
Glassman (2025-05-16 19:50:08+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166327919
Glassman (2025-05-16 19:52:23+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166328093
fortera_au (2025-05-21 01:46:33+00:00): Hey there, surface=bitumen isn't usually used, surface=asphalt is what generally gets used instead.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166328129
Conor Dunne (2025-05-22 00:37:47+00:00): Yes you are correct, I should have specified "bitumen seal". It was originally designated as asphalt, which was incorrect
fortera_au (2025-05-22 00:59:56+00:00): Hi, bitumen seal should still be marked as asphalt, thats the tag OSM uses for all forms of bitumen. I'd check out the page for the surface tag on the wiki for more information.
Glassman (2025-05-16 19:50:57+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166328142
Glassman (2025-05-16 19:52:48+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166328192
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:03:19+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166339106
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:06:32+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166339245
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:07:13+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166339280
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:07:36+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166339297
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:22:09+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166339924
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:23:19+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166339975
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:28:02+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166340152
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:28:05+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166340152
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:28:31+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166340170
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:29:40+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166340211
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:29:41+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166340211
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:30:36+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166340250
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:30:37+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166340250
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:33:23+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166340349
Glassman (2025-05-16 19:54:10+00:00): The tree row, looks just like a bunch of trees which could be tagged as natural=wood, with inner polygons where there are no trees.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166329118
SomeoneElse2 (2026-02-20 23:02:28+00:00): Hello,
Andy from te Data Working Group here.  Thanks for tidying up here, but just so that you are aware, there's still quite a bit of "misaligned hedges" etc. 
As an example, if you open the editor at https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=20/53.1742671/-4.3395658 and show the OSMUK cadastral parcels, you can see that neither the hedge nor the field boundary are especially well aligned here.
Best Regards,
Andy
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:33:48+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166340370
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:35:03+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166340410
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:36:15+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166340451
Glassman (2025-05-16 19:56:35+00:00): When a business operates inside of a building with multiple businesses, just add a node for the business. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours on how to add opening hours.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166329229
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:37:07+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166340483
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:38:06+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166340511
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:42:26+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166340686
Glassman (2025-05-16 20:02:19+00:00): I went ahead and removed the duplicate buildings and unneeded multipolygons.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166329396
tukangsampat (2025-05-16 05:24:30+00:00): Hi tesalonikap, selamat datang di OpenStreetMap!

Saya baru saja memperbaiki beberapa suntingan Anda karena bisa diindikasikan sebagai vandalisme, walau mungkin itikad Anda mengedit baik. Namun alangkah baiknya gunakan tag dengan baik dan benar, dan pelajari cara menyunting peta OSM dengan baik. Terima kasih!
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:42:27+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166340686
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:42:28+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166340686
Glassman (2025-05-16 20:03:46+00:00): I removed the duplicate building. There was already a tag for Akins and a node
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166329578
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:42:29+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166340686
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:42:30+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166340686
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:47:00+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166340856
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:47:01+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166340856
tuan_gsm (2025-06-26 05:00:50+00:00): Vị trí này: 21.10944921940253,105.99017948078551 có dãy phân cách cố định không đi được bạn xem lại chỗ này nha
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:47:02+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166340856
rempshaener (2025-05-16 18:42:45+00:00): Hallo,
bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12841033970 stimmt was mit der Nennweite nicht.
Viele Grüße
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:47:03+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166340856
nevw (2025-05-16 05:05:44+00:00): Hi, this is not the correct way to add your business to osm and I have reverted it.
Try this site for info for companies to add their site to osm
 https://www.geoapify.com/osm-for-local-marketing/
nevw (2025-05-16 05:10:29+00:00): You need to add a new node at the physical location where your business is based instead of added the details to the suburb point. The above link with help.
MxxCon (2025-05-22 19:55:19+00:00): Hello.
When adding phone numbers in OSM, they should always include country dialing code. In US it's +1.👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166330333
lunar_jaws812 (2025-05-16 21:47:01+00:00): All my homies hate Flock, thanks for mapping them
mappingman2 (2025-05-16 21:58:27+00:00): Are you homies stealing cars?
lunar_jaws812 (2025-05-16 23:21:08+00:00): omfg imagine lol
lunar_jaws812 (2025-05-16 23:23:59+00:00): It's more like...4th amendment type stuff, I guess. Like these articles
- https://ij.org/press-release/judge-rules-lawsuit-challenging-norfolks-use-of-flock-cameras-can-proceed/
- https://www.404media.co/license-plate-reader-company-flock-is-building-a-massive-people-lookup-tool-leak-shows/

Or 1st amendment for that matter: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/02/anti-surveillance-mapmaker-refuses-flock-safetys-cease-and-desist-demand
mappingman2 (2025-05-17 00:14:12+00:00): Alhambra PD keeps recovering stolen vehicles and making arrests off what ar clearly ALPR hits (aka "noticing" stolen vehicles):
- https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJsWC_Zyvbp/
- https://www.instagram.com/p/DIremnZBSL0/
– https://www.instagram.com/reel/DIpnpUSpbvV/
_ https://www.instagram.com/reel/DHPiIgAJVi4/
lunar_jaws812 (2025-05-17 00:48:23+00:00): Good for them
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:49:36+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166340952
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-01 01:16:08+00:00): DWG revert - apparent undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167032831
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:49:37+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166340952
Udarian (2025-05-16 20:12:59+00:00): the Bing aerial imagery, which in this part of Miami dade county is more up to date, does not show those jersey barriers and thus they are not there unless you have access to some streetside imagery you have not listed in the sources or mentioned.
Fil_Vim (2025-05-17 04:32:42+00:00):  Hi Udarian, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
Fil_Vim (2025-05-19 16:11:26+00:00): Hi Udarian, I reviewed the edits and realized I forgot to add a source to the changeset.

In addition to ESRI aerial imagery, I used TomTom proprietary street level imagery from March 12 2025. In that source the jersey barriers are present, preventing travel along this section of highway. I also noticed traffic cones blocking other highways but I could not find any listed permanent closures.

Do you know if these are temporary due to work at the port on surface level parking lots?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:44:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336061 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:45:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336102 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:44:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336061 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:45:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336102 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-01 01:16:09+00:00): DWG revert - apparent undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167032831
i2004 (2025-05-16 09:28:30+00:00): que cambiaste del 24?
AgusQui (2025-05-17 05:16:10+00:00): Una parada mal ubicada
BudgieInWA (2025-05-21 01:40:17+00:00): The very west of the footpath you added here overlaps awkwardly with the road, because the road was not aligned properly to begin with. The overlap of footpath and road, and the connectivity of those elements is not correct for the situation there.

In adding a footpath alongside this road, its pretty much necessary to move the road way closer to the centre of the actual road - as seen in the imagery.

I'll leave this one for you to tackle :) The rest of the edit is great, and the inclusion of all the `highway=crossing` nodes is appreciated.
https://osmcha.org/changesets/166331618
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166331618
BudgieInWA (2025-05-24 06:24:13+00:00): Also, make sure that footpaths share a node when they join with another path or road, not just have a node nearby. Look for the grey circle indicating a shared node, vs a white circle at the end without.
Glassman (2025-05-16 20:09:26+00:00): I don't really understand the purpose of the pedestrian area since it looks like there are two leisure areas inside of it. Check this area out on UW campus in Seattle for some tips https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/47.653879/-122.308065 Let me know if you need help
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166331779
Filip009 (2025-05-19 18:54:02+00:00): Tu sa to podarilo nechtiac zmeniť. Odporúčam vypnúť si administratívne hranice v pravej časti "mapové údaje" alebo klávesová skratka "U" vypnúť zobrazovanie hraníc. Mapa je tak prehľadnejšia a je jednoduchšia na upravovanie.
Tsur Halamish (2025-05-27 16:01:45+00:00): היי
לגבי שביל חנה זמר- רכבת
Relation 19136119
האם הוא מוגדר בעיריה כשביל ספציפי שאז יש הגיון ליצור עבורו יחס, או שזה קיבוץ של כמה שבילים שבחרת מתוך רשת השבילים של עיריית תל אביב. הקישור שנתת הוא לכל הרשת.
Tsur Halamish (2025-06-03 09:31:27+00:00): I understand its not a specific city one but a collection you made. I'll delete just the relation
streckenkundler (2026-01-25 20:30:18+00:00): ...ich hoffe mal, daß du in diesem CS nicht noch mehr Schindluder getrieben hast! Du hast bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17970461 nachweislich name=Bergbaufolgelandschaft Grünhaus Das ist für dieses Objekt FALSCH!!! Siehe Verordnung: https://bravors.brandenburg.de/verordnungen/nsg_gruenhaus

Es gibt einen Namen für das NSG selbst, aber es gibt KEINEN NAMEN für die Teilfläche des Naturentwicklungsgebietes!
miroslavuzice87 (2025-05-16 07:54:07+00:00): Hello mapper02,

I noticed that you've made a significant number of edits in this area, including the deletion of 865 entities. These deletions appear to have affected the coastline around Málaga, which in turn has broken several administrative boundaries.

As a result, the following relations are currently incomplete or disrupted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5275848
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10589437
Complete area around this place has missing roads and footways: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3971340667

Could you please take a look and verify whether these deletions were intentional? If not, it might be worth reviewing and possibly reverting some of the changes to restore coastline integrity.

Thank you for your contributions and for taking the time to review this.

Best regards,
Miroslav
mapper02 (2025-05-16 12:12:39+00:00): Sorry i dont know whats happened, i dont know how to fixed it, can you revert the changes?
miroslavuzice87 (2025-05-16 13:57:07+00:00): Hi Mapper02, thank you for a reply. I tried to revert your changeset but couldn't, it's too big and revert plugin breaks inside JOSM
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-05-16 14:04:55+00:00): I will try to do it, please stop editing for couple of hours, so I can go and check errors which will occure due to conflicts with new chagesets.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-05-16 14:21:30+00:00): Fixed, just go and investigate if there is something that I have missed to fix
eggie (2025-05-16 12:15:45+00:00): Top!
pavvv (2025-05-16 11:40:16+00:00): Na pewno nie ma znaków D-7 na otwartym odcinku ekspresówki?
pavvv (2025-05-16 11:40:22+00:00): Mam na myśli S7
Yunkers (2025-05-16 11:56:31+00:00): Oczywiście że na S7 i S52 są znaki ekspresówki.
eggie (2025-05-16 08:36:53+00:00): Dag Matthew.. Bedoel je die node die vastzit aan de gebouwomtrek met
dezelfde info T&A maar met shop =convenience?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3736733174

Moet die vermelding weg? 

Gr eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:44:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336061 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:44:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336061 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:45:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336102 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:44:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336061 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:45:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336102 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:45:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336102 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:44:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336061 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:44:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336061 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:44:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336061 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:45:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336102 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:44:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336061 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:45:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336102 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:44:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336061 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:44:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336061 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:45:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336102 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:45:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336102 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:44:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336061 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:44:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336061 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:44:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336061 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:45:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336102 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there