piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
RaphaelPasloin (2025-04-05 10:45:26+00:00): Hello,

The combinaison is not very used even in use , personnaly i haven't a strong opinion about the scheme  as it depend also of ground situation.

And that's also a point here ; it's look like you edit sometimes for your application instead of fixing what's is realy false.

It's clearly not a  building passage , even not a pedestrian , yes it's indoor but it's a indoor footway , open when the amenites insides are open, and the layout is not like that. 

The entrance south is under the roof : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1005940514380536 and if you look on aerial it's completly offsed.

On the north it's looks correct 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2099569227222502

Of course you don't have introduce the initial mistake but please ; if there is something wrong add a note with some pictures instead of just add a tag for Wandrer.

Have a good day,
Raphaël
JannesBraet (2025-04-05 10:59:11+00:00): "It's clearly not a building passage , even not a pedestrian , yes it's indoor but it's a indoor footway , open when the amenites insides are open, and the layout is not like that."

So the indoor tag is more correct than what it was before which was my intention. It might still not be perfect but in my opinion it's not a bad idea to improve something even though it might still not be perfect?
bxl-forever (2025-04-05 15:03:41+00:00): Thanks for the explanations and for the pictures.

Indeed, this is a complicated case, combining an indoor footway (one part), covered footway (small outdoor part under the roof) and highway=pedestrian roads (some parts that are large enough to accomodate service vehicles).
I split several ways and moved the doors to the correct location.  It should be better now.
NeisReview (2025-03-29 07:16:26+00:00): #NoTags

Hi, welcome to OSM.

I've reviewed your latest map edits and it seems that this changeset you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
Jennaill (2025-03-31 12:44:29+00:00): Hi,

If I created nodes and ways, it was by accident. I thought I was just outlining the buildings I saw, as the assignment requested. I see the looon lists of them below, but for some reason the map is not populating in order for me to see what I did wrong. I'm so sorry for all the trouble it's causing.
rab (2025-04-06 17:01:15+00:00): a way tagged as building by yourself:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1112079052

a way without any tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1372491083

just open the changeset , click the edit button and add the missing tags

or follow this link to do so

https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&changeset=164224209#map=17/-17.355752/37.271540
Gustavo22Soares (2025-10-14 14:13:15+00:00): edificios devem ser mapeados individualmente
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-29 01:39:32+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17463
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 05:19:36+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164660627
b-jazz (2025-03-29 06:06:25+00:00): As mentioned in my comments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163633261, you shouldn't be using joining polygons to define a single feature like a fairway. You should be using multipolygons as described in the wiki page. Please refer back and let me know that you've seen this note. Thanks.
NeisReview (2025-03-29 07:16:39+00:00): #NoTags

Hi, welcome to OSM.

I've reviewed your latest map edits and it seems that this changeset you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
VLD549 (2025-05-10 12:34:00+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. Two out of three links provided shows the name to be Gemeentehuis Heist-op-den-Berg.
Could you elaborate why it should be  Lokaal Bestuur Heist-op-den-Berg - Burgerzaken?
I only want to understand. Thank you!
Robin On Wheels (2025-05-11 09:40:03+00:00): Hey this was changed in cooperation with the city itself. We have a project with them to update their accessibility information.
VLD549 (2025-06-04 14:20:41+00:00): Ok, thank you!
Robin On Wheels (2025-06-04 14:23:26+00:00): Your welcome. Most changes we do with our app is in close cooperation with the cities. And we check the info on site.
MaliMrav (2025-03-29 10:14:56+00:00): Hi km2bp,

Thank you for you valuable additions to maps of Belgrade.

May I ask you to properly capitalize all names?

For the past couple of days I was correcting your changes, but it would be much easier if you do it correctly in the first place.

In Serbian we use Sentence case. For english names, use Title Case.

Examples:

- Обнова споменика захвалности Француској
- Restauration du monument de reconnaissance à la France
- Уметнички павиљон „Цвијета Зузорић”
- Cvijeta Zuzorić Art Pavillion

Capitalization rules are listed here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Capitalisation

Thanks,
MaliMrav
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-29 01:46:02+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17469
SpinOff (2025-03-28 21:00:02+00:00): Do edycji granic administracyjnych konieczny jest JOSM. Niektóre granice miejscowości mają zduplikowane linie, a niektóre wymieszały się z granicami parafii
grzegorz75jan (2025-03-28 22:37:18+00:00): Okoliczności łagodzące:
- Edytujący odpowiada na komentarze
- Pojawił się na Discordzie i prosił o pomoc.

Z mojej strony otrzymał film bo sam wiedzy, praktyki nie mam https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fG4btlAZbvM i tam właśnie jest Nakierowanie na JOSM. iD się trochę rozwija ale nie wiem na ile pod takie zastosowania.

Sam film nie pomoże bo brakuje edytującemu trochę podstaw ogólnych edytowania a szczególnie granic i z stąd będą mieszania samych granic.

Pewne rzeczy wymagają czasu do nabycia umiejętności i przydało by się  wsparcie ale niestety mało kto umie dobrze robić granice i nie zawsze ma czas na choćby sprawdzenie kogoś innego.
Dimitar155 (2025-03-30 04:59:01+00:00): Thanks!
ChrissW-R1 (2025-04-01 17:31:46+00:00): You're welcome
silversurfer83 (2026-02-08 21:07:13+00:00): Moin

warum hast du denn im Neubaugebiet Frankenberg die 240er als eigene ways angelegt? Dort gibt es, bis auf einen kaum vorhandenen Bordstein, keinerlei bauliche Trennung und dann ist es idR so, dass wir die Infos am Straßen-way erfassen

cheers
Gustavo22Soares (2025-10-14 14:16:29+00:00): areas residencial ou com edificios não devem ser mapeados como areas verdes
une abeille (2025-04-03 04:09:01+00:00): Attention, vous avez doublé Beaubien Deli. C'est déjà là comme un point. Je mets toujours les entreprises comme ça sauf quand vraiment *tout* le bâtiment est pour l'entreprise (comme un McDo).

Aussi, "apartments" est plus spécifique que "residential" pour les bâtiments. :)
HNA456 (2025-04-03 16:15:18+00:00): Bonjour,
Oops! 
Comment on fait pour enlever ce doublon ? Je ne voyais par la mention dans l'autre interface pour visualiser la carte. 
Pour Habitations Nouvelles Avenues, je voulais en fait ajouter que c'est un OSBL d'habitation mais il n'y avait pas l'option donc je suis allé pour résidentiel. On peut le modifier si ca convient mieux.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 20:48:16+00:00): Hello!

You used
tracktype=grade 2
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/560385317/history

Have you maybe meant
tracktype=grade2
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
BubbaJuice (2025-04-03 00:44:38+00:00): Apologies for the large changeset
Mezonens (2025-03-30 12:53:54+00:00): Sveiks!
Pamanīju tavos changeset’os nelielu kļūdu. Lauku teritorijās tu atsevišķas viensētas mēdz apzīmēt kā landuse=residential (piemēram, way 1372508681). Pareizāk būtu tās apzīmēt ar place=isolated_dwelling vai landuse=farmyard, ja redzams, ka saimniecībā ir izteikta lauksaimniecības infrastruktūra (stallis, kūts, graudu kaltes u.tml.).
landuse=residential būtu piemērotāk lietot vietās, kur blakus viena otrai atrodas vairākas apdzīvotas ēkas un tās var apvienot vienā poligonā.

Veiksmi turpmākajā kartēšanā!
Syl (2025-03-28 21:33:58+00:00): Bonjour, je n'ai pas traité cette note car je n'ai pas trouvé de source qui confirme le nom de cette rue, je pensais aller sur place pour vérifier.
Quelle source as tu utilisé pour confirmer le nom ?
Syl (2025-03-30 20:17:31+00:00): Merci pour la correction.
Quel est l'intérêt d'ajouter des infos comme ça sans vérification ? Le but des notes c'est d'aider à améliorer OSM, pas de fermer le plus de notes possible en faisant des modifications sans prendre le temps de faire des vérifications ni de comprendre le contexte...
HugoC01 (2025-09-06 16:06:42+00:00): Je serai d'avantage vigilant
Christian Lederer (2025-03-28 21:02:42+00:00): Sorry, danebengeklickt. Euer Nachbar hat keine behindertengerechten Toiletten. Folgender Change = Undo.
Lezurex (2025-03-29 19:29:45+00:00): Kannst du die beiden Treppen bitte noch zum restlichen Netz verbinden? So als Insel machen sie keinen Sinn.
stillhart (2025-03-30 11:42:52+00:00): Ist noch eine Baustelle, die Treppen sind da, ich weiss aber tatsächlich noch nicht wo die hingehen. Werde aktualisieren sobald ich es weiss.
eggie (2025-03-28 21:38:37+00:00): Hoi  Een highway=service routeert niet lekker als er een fietsroute over loopt in sommige routers. In dat geval highway=unclassified gebruiken.
motor_vehicle=no stopt ook de routering voor moped en mofa.
Zijn het hier aansluitende bromfietspaden? 
moped=designated mofa=designated ?
Tot de Zuidweg vanaf de Mark wel. 
groet
eggie
eggie (2025-03-28 21:40:32+00:00): 66-A1 kwam nu 2x voor .. Ik heb één weer veranderd in 66-A4, want die was uit de data.
eggie (2025-03-28 21:53:37+00:00): De ventweg bi de rotonde aangepast naar unclassified en mofa en moped =yes toegevoegd. Die ziet OSM als motorvoertuigen.
G12a= tags toegevoegd aan fietspaden.
accesstagging is lastig.
Groet,
eggie
Flits216 (2025-03-28 21:57:36+00:00): Ahh top bedankt! Accesstagging heb ik nog redelijk wat moeite mee😅
eggie (2025-03-28 22:04:02+00:00): Die Oostrand (rondweg) is ook een wonderlijke. Daar staat een C9 verkeersbord. (even gespiekt in straatkijk) (Verbod alle vormen van Langzaam verkeer) 
Dus verboden voor landbouw verkeer. Met een onderbord landbouwvoertuigen toegestaan.
Dus agricultural=yes zou het moeten zijn.
Ik weet niet of dat nog steeds zo is.
Voorlopig laat ik agricultural=no nog even staan... maar het is denk ik fout.
Flits216 (2025-03-29 14:17:25+00:00): Dat is wel erg bijzonder ja! Ik moet zeggen dat ik er nog nooit landbouw verkeer heb zien rijden en me wel redelijk gevaarlijk lijkt met de snelheden. Ik zal er binnenkort langs rijden dus even controleren.
SomeoneElse (2025-03-30 11:14:20+00:00): I think that the merge of the ways to make https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323221895/history makde a couple of townlands invalid polygons; I split it again in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164282607 .
To be clear it might not have been this changeset; this was just the most recent one that edited the road :)
Dafo43 (2025-03-30 17:45:44+00:00): Thanks, been making a lot of changes so I would expect to have made a few mistakes.
Vinber-Pro (2025-05-16 13:35:19+00:00): salut @eric,
j'ai ouvert une discussion pour les maison landaise de la solidarité https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/maison-landaise-de-la-solidarite/34069

ton avis ? j'ai vu que tu es passé sur de nombreuses, tu as plutôt mis office=government .. on continue sur le forum ?

c'est énorme j'ai l'impression de toujours tombé sur toi dans les contributions landaises :)
Baloo Uriza (2025-03-31 15:38:40+00:00): If this is standing but not operating, then undoing this change and changing opening_hours to "closed 24/7" might be better.  If it's now vacant, then removing opening hours and adding shop=vacant would be better.  In either case, building=retail is probably not what you want on building:part=yes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164227701
CyberMinion (2025-03-31 23:55:13+00:00): Thank you for the tips! I'm not always certain of the best practice. This store is vacant, until another tenant can be secured. Big Lots is gone from this location, and by all indications, not coming back. This retail location is part of a strip mall, FYI. The building will still be of type "retail" but I don't know what the "building:part=yes" tag means.
Baloo Uriza (2025-03-31 23:59:08+00:00): Aah, OK, it means it's part of a building.  So building:part=yes would just mean it's part of a larger contiguous building.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part

So in the case of a vacant storefront, I'd remove opening hours and contact information and any amenity=*, office=* or shop=* value and replace it with shop=vacant.
CyberMinion (2025-04-01 00:08:03+00:00): Okay, that makes sense. Thank you again. I set shop=vacant, and yes, I see what you mean. I missed the hours and phone number, so I cleared those. Submitted via #164352732.
rednail (2025-04-09 15:13:22+00:00): Hallo, hier gilt wieder die Regel, dass Beschreibungen nicht als Name hinterlegt werden sollen. Zur Präzisierung kann der shelter_type angegeben werden:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:shelter_type
geisthugo123 (2025-04-03 19:55:40+00:00): Hi, vielen Dank für den Edit.
Solche Radwege wie die Radschutzstreifen in der Alten Viernheimer Straße kannst du zusätzlich mit cycleway:both:lane=advisory taggen.
Dann ist auch klar dass das keine echten Radfahrstreifen sondern nur Schutzstreifen sind.
Viele Grüße
NeisBot (2025-03-28 21:45:34+00:00): Hi AbigailColman03, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 91% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 2 highway(s)
- 38 building(s)
- 1 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=164228191
NeisRevert (2025-03-29 11:26:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164245137 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
rednail (2025-04-09 15:09:43+00:00): Hallo, bei Öffnungszeiten kannst du bei https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours nachschauen.

Hier bietet sich an:
open "täglich März bis ca Oktober"
oder (genaue Zeit geraten)
Mar-Oct: Mo-Su 09:00-20:00

Angaben ohne Gewähr, muss man schauen, wie das dann ausgewertet wird.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-28 21:51:14+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12708516644

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
literan (2025-03-29 09:41:01+00:00): поаккуратнее, пожалуйста, жилые зоны раздвигайте. Здесь отодвинули абы как (а они обычно отрисовываются по бордюрам дорог)
literan (2025-03-29 09:41:15+00:00): исправляю за вашей правкой
Александр Синявский (2025-03-29 21:08:02+00:00): Эту тему когда-то обсуждали в чате OSM. Нет строго правила рисовать по бордюру. Некоторые просто считают, что так красивее.
Важно помнить, что:
- дорога (улица) не относится к территории жилой застройки (или иному landuse), люди на ней не живут;
- перекрытие полигоном дороги мешает отрисовке её элементов (тротуара, газона, остановок, прееходов и прочего);
- смещение полигона не повлияет на восприятие территории пользователем.

Другое дело, если в landuse попадают внутриквартальные проезды ("Жилая зона", служебные дороги, парковочные проезды и т.п.). В таком случае это единый объект землепользования и полигон не разделяется.
Александр Синявский (2025-03-29 21:15:24+00:00): Жилой зоной Вы покрыли территорию, на которой находится МГСУ, Старообрядческий богословско-учительский институт, которые должны быть отмечены landuse=education. Объекты стоят как раз вдоль улицы.
literan (2025-03-30 12:04:27+00:00): > Нет строго правила рисовать по бордюру. 


в ОСМ вообще нет строгих правил, кроме запрета копирования из других  карт. Вся вики - это не правила, а набор закрепленных обычаев, как принято мапить.

но вы точки границы жилой зоны вовсе кинули куда-то "в молоко", на деревья. То есть было как-то логично, стало хуже (причем только для некоторых точек полигона). https://osmcha.org/changesets/164228363

>  дорога (улица) 
Дорога и улица это совершенно разные понятия. По улице может не быть дороги, а может быть сразу две дороги (проезжие части) Так что эта фраза непонятна.

> перекрытие полигоном дороги мешает отрисовке её элементов

не вопрос, если вам что-то мешает - сдвиньте, а потом верните на место. 

> смещение полигона не повлияет на восприятие территории пользователем

почему вы так решили? данные геобазы OSM используются пользователями не только для того, чтобы на карту смотреть, а, например, для различных исследований, тому уже в форуме и чате приводилось множество примеров. И полигоны landuse в этих исследованиях используются нередко.

> Жилой зоной Вы покрыли территорию, на которой находится МГСУ, 

я ничего не покрывал. Этот полигон был нарисован много лет назад. Два года назад я всего лишь превратил его из полигона в мультиполигон. А сейчас исправлял за вами.

Если у вас есть сведения об институте, отметьте, пожалуйста, и landuse=education сделайте.
rednail (2025-04-09 14:59:13+00:00): Hallo, stimmt die Adresse hier? Sieht eher nach Schulstraße als Mannlehen aus.
eggie (2025-03-29 15:21:54+00:00): Dag A dg6 

Niet simpelweg iets omzetten in een park. Dit gebeurt meestal om het spel PokemonGo te beïnvloeden.
Je verwijdert de details en vervangt deze door een transparant. 
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam. 
Leisure=park is de functie en die moet je los zien van wat je ziet de landuse.
Hier een voorbeeld van een park met landuse en een losse cover leisure= park er helemaal los overheen. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80552/4.66665


MVG
eggie
A-dg6 (2025-03-29 16:37:26+00:00): Ik zal er in het vervolg op letten, bedankt.
eggie (2025-03-29 17:24:14+00:00): Top....   Ik heb wat landuse teruggezet... en bomen toegevoegd.
Mapse,
eggie
rednail (2025-04-09 14:52:52+00:00): Hallo, hier ist das Ärztezentrum Gerolzhofen gedoppelt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/476997424
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12708565338
b-jazz (2025-03-29 06:53:24+00:00): Hello golf course mapper. The lines that define Fairways and Greens should never intersect or partially overlap each other and we noticed that they are overlapping in one or more of the fairway/green pairs in this changeset. If there is no obvious fringe around the green, the fairway should butt up against the green and every node between them should be *shared*. If there is a fringe around the green that is similar to the fairway, the fairway should extend around the green and the two objects should be merged together into a multipolygon (See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon for how to create them with your map editor).  Please read the wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions, please reply here and I'll gladly help clarify things. Thanks!
aagemillwk (2025-04-07 14:16:35+00:00): Hey b-jazz,
I was following a video tutorial to create a golf course for simulator use, unaware that it was incorrect. I will work on correcting those fairway and green intersections this week. Thanks for the heads up!
b-jazz (2025-04-07 15:34:42+00:00): Thanks for the response. 
Could you send me a link to the tutorial? I'm pretty sure we are aware of it and have tried to get the creator to amend it or somehow get the correct information out. But just in case, I want to make sure we cover all bases and address each tutorial that might lead people down the wrong path. Thanks.
aagemillwk (2025-04-07 16:56:14+00:00): b-jazz,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OziVGuQ9bKg&list=PLySt73T-l6Yn_JBRH5wovOjTeQJ1_QLKZ&index=5
Go directly to 9:43 as he does a small fairway and green. The video series is four years old so it maybe something that has changed since he created them. 
This is just my local golf course I thought I could create to play on a simulator in the winter. Open Street Maps is just one part of the procedure. 

Thanks, Mike.
b-jazz (2025-04-07 17:17:02+00:00): Heh. You can see my bot changed something nearby and the name shows up at the bottom of his OSM window at that timestamp. 

So yeah, we know about this guy. He's been banned from OSM for putting out bad information and refusing to correct it. He's even turned off comments on the video so people can't add something along the lines of  "hey, don't do that thing he talks about at 9:43 in the video. Do this instead..." 

How did you come across the video? Just a google search or did something from TGC lead you to it? Maybe we can address it further up the chain.
aagemillwk (2025-04-07 23:31:28+00:00): Yep, just searched YouTube for building a "Lidar TGC 2019 Course" and his series came up. 

I'm going to work on number 1 right now and see how it goes for me! Thanks,
DaDapperMapper (2025-03-28 23:05:52+00:00): Correction: Comment is "Updated road segments in Jardim Paranavaí #adt"
Ropino (2025-03-30 19:05:28+00:00): Hi,
woher stammt der Name?
Du hattest keine Quelle im CS angegeben.
kernl (2025-03-31 00:33:34+00:00): Der Donald Trump hat den so benannt ...
Jrachi (2025-03-29 10:55:39+00:00): Ciao.
Hai dimenticato di aggiungere il ruolo guidepost.

Ivo
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-29 03:04:43+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17475
fortera_au (2025-03-29 04:12:32+00:00): Hi, you've removed this from being a road route, this has nothing to do with being a bike route.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164230586
fortera_au (2025-03-29 04:19:56+00:00): Hi, I've reverted this due to issues with the mapping, please see my changeset comments on the changes for more details. Happy for you to message me directly if you do need assistance with any of the tagging I've reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164233798
shanewh (2025-03-29 08:59:32+00:00): The bike lane attributes of the A5 need to be removed. It's one thing to revert my edit, quite another to ignore the reason for my edit.
fortera_au (2025-03-29 09:03:33+00:00): The change you made didn't make any difference to the bike lane tagging, and despite it being a major rode route, if the lane exist it should be tagged there. 

All you did was remove what type of route was there, and removing the bike lane tagging would be considered vandalism by the community since it's intentionally removing correct information. As much as it may be a busy route, we map what exists on the ground, so if a bike lane is there, tagging that one isn't intentionally is just incorrect.
shanewh (2025-03-29 09:13:43+00:00): Just because someone paints a lane with a bike symbol in it, that doesn't make it a bike lane. Oh it's tricky.
fortera_au (2025-03-29 09:17:43+00:00): Some random person painting a "bike lane" would be pretty obvious and would have been removed. If the council, state or federal government has painted it, then one exists.