piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
elsy1 (2025-05-23 17:54:30+00:00): so your account unban and again starting to vandalism yes?!
elsy1 (2025-05-23 18:01:39+00:00): درود، فقط برای اینکه کتوجه باشید فرقی ندارد صد اکانت دیگر بسازید، عمل خرابکاری برابر است با مسدود شدن حساب شما. باتشکر
GanKonMalade (2026-02-14 16:04:37+00:00): Bonjour @gebux , dans ce change set, vous avez sans doute par erreur dupliqué certains chemins existants, un utilisateur l'a relevé via la note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5025576#map=16/43.81501/6.26914 

Entre le col de l'Ane et la Clue et entre la CLue et le Col de plein voir, le chemin est dédoublé depuis que vous en avec ajouté un.
Serait-possible de corriger cette erreur ?
gebux (2026-03-16 21:26:40+00:00): Hi GanKonMalade,
I entered the paths on 22.5.2025.
Two days earlier, on the 20.5.2025 the 'Office de Tourisme la Palud-sur-Verdon' deleted a bunch of paths&tracks, which were restored on 9.6.2025 by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167409999
Paths I entered earlier on an 'empty' map are now duplicated. 

I will delete the paths I entered since the old paths are now restored again
RubenKelevra (2025-05-29 07:20:54+00:00): Top, danke!

Hattest Du geschaut ob die Eisenstein-Straße noch Einbahnstraße ist?
AndreaDp271 (2025-05-23 07:14:41+00:00): Ciao, io non avevo segnato le corsie perché hanno riasfaltato con un asfalto non conforme e hanno eliminato tutte le righe, in pratica non sembra più una pista d'atletica😂
NeisReview (2025-05-23 05:20:20+00:00): Please stop deleting mapped paths and roads!
NeisReview (2025-05-23 05:27:07+00:00): Do these edits come from the same user, or is the overlap purely coincidental?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/RedCedar1/history

Regardless, I have submitted reports on both to the Data Working Group (DWG).
RupertJames (2025-05-23 13:49:16+00:00): This is not me or my edits.
citrula (2025-05-23 00:04:49+00:00): You should only mark the part behind the gate as private - otherwise parts of the public road network, like the turnaround at Colina Trail, are not routable. You can do this by making a node at the gate and splitting the way there.

I fixed this case for you, happy mapping!
NeisBot (2025-05-23 12:09:27+00:00): Hi melih-666, and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added track type and grade information to improve trail mapping accuracy"

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #AIgenerated #Gibberish
aharvey (2025-05-22 23:51:27+00:00): Thanks. Based on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=permit

> This tag should be used in cases where a permit is required, but is routinely granted to everyone requesting it. In cases where access to permit is obstructed it would be more appropriate to tag these areas access=private or access=no. So access=permit does not apply where permit is rarely granted, or only granted in exceptional circumstances, or if obtaining it is complex or there is a long waitlist.

It does sound like access=permit is better.
A67-A67 (2025-05-23 10:51:31+00:00): Graag geen losse eindjes creëeren. Dus ofwel de gehele weg tot aan de N264 is secundair, ofwel de gehele weg is tertiair.
ChromeLotus (2025-06-02 18:53:07+00:00): Hello OSM-SAMOA,

I’ve observed that in several areas across Samoa where there are highway=path features intersecting roads that appear to be trafficked by vehicles. For instance, there are non-path highway features in Nu'u that vehicles have trouble or cannot route because of the application of highway=path (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141690132). According to OSM policy, the highway=path tag generally does not account for four-wheeled vehicle access (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=path). In cases where the infrastructure supports motor vehicles, it may be more appropriate to use tags such as highway=track or highway=service.
Could you share the reasoning behind this tagging approach? Understanding the intent would help clarify how best to support local mapping efforts. Would you also be open to re-evaluating these features in areas where vehicle access is possible, to ensure accurate classification?

I look forward to hearing from you and appreciate your time on this matter!
 -ChromeLotus
OSM-SAMOA (2025-06-02 21:41:46+00:00): Hi ChromeLotus,

Thank you for your message and for taking the time to review my contributions.

Apologies for any inconvenience caused. I’ve been working to tidy up the data across Samoa using cadastral and land survey information available through the Ministry of Works, Transport and Infrastructure, where I am currently employed.

There are numerous informal roads, driveways, and off-road tracks across the islands that do not correspond to official surveyed alignments. To address this discrepancy and reduce visual clutter in OSM layers used by key agencies — such as the Land Transport Authority, Samoa Water Authority, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, and the Electric Power Corporation — I’ve defaulted most non-surveyed, single-lane, and grass/muddy access routes to highway=path. This helps our planners distinguish surveyed public roads from informal or private-use access ways.

That said, these paths have not been removed entirely, as they still hold utility value — for example, for water meter locations and power meter access — and are used by GIS teams and field crews across multiple ministries. In Samoan, these are often referred to as "auala galulue" (working roads), and while they’re not legally surveyed or gazetted under the Taking of Lands Act 1964, they remain vital for service and operational access.

Going forward, I agree that a more accurate classification — perhaps highway=track with appropriate access=* or service=* tags — would provide better clarity for both routing and planning. I’ll begin reviewing and updating relevant areas, and I truly appreciate your input on how best to align local conventions with OSM tagging standards.

Please feel free to suggest any tag conventions or regional presets that may improve accuracy while still reflecting our local context. Thanks again for supporting quality mapping in Samoa!

Best regards,
Leicester (OSM-SAMOA)
ChromeLotus (2025-06-05 15:16:22+00:00): Hello OSM-SAMOA, thank you for the response back. It is great knowing that these highways are considered for review and my tagging suggestions are also considered for potential updates. It is clear that our interests align in producing a better map in OSM. I also noticed, after reviewing the highway network of Samoa, that there are other data issues (crossing highways [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1377341784]; overlapping highways [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141032181]; and highway node duplication [https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12753789899]) in the region. Do you have an estimated time of completion for updating highway classifications throughout the island? And would you like additional support in addressing the other mentioned data issues as you’re updating the classification network? Let me know what works for you and I greatly thank you for your cordialness and cooperation.
-ChromeLotus
OSM-SAMOA (2025-06-06 00:17:57+00:00): Hi ChromeLotus,

Thanks again for your thoughtful follow-up — I truly appreciate your observations and the constructive spirit of your feedback.

I’ve since made the initial corrections you flagged and will continue reviewing the highway classifications across Samoa, particularly focusing on:

Differentiating paved vs unpaved surfaces,

Clarifying access roads vs residential roads, and

Verifying publicly surveyed vs informal (or undeveloped "paper") roads.

Your point is well taken — while distinguishing minor access routes is helpful for field users, my priority has been ensuring that officially gazetted or surveyed roads are represented first, even where physical development hasn’t yet occurred. This is especially important for government planning, land use coordination, and utilities (e.g., LTA, EPC, SWA, MAFF).

Regarding the additional issues you kindly pointed out (crossings, overlaps, and node duplication) — these are definitely on my radar. I’m currently working through a staged review, beginning with the Apia Urban Area and expanding outward by district.

To your generous offer: yes, I’d be very grateful for additional support in addressing these and other structural issues, particularly where OSM data integrity impacts routing and analysis.

Let’s stay in touch — happy to coordinate if you’re working on a specific area or have tools/scripts to assist with bulk validation.

Best regards,
Leicester (OSM-SAMOA)
OSM-SAMOA (2025-06-06 00:23:53+00:00): I’ve been actively working on corrections and additions for the past two months (over 33,000 contributions so far) , and I estimate it will take another two to three months to complete the current phase of work for Upolu.

This project has extended well beyond just highways — I’ve been systematically reviewing and updating nearly every major feature type, including:

Buildings: schools, hospitals, churches, commercial premises, and resorts

Natural features: mangroves, rivers, and beaches

Infrastructure: power stations, water catchments, bridges, and road networks

Other public assets: essential for planning, utility mapping, and emergency response

I’ve not yet progressed to Savai’i, which will form the next stage once the Upolu dataset is brought to a more consistent and reliable standard.

Your support with quality assurance — particularly in validating overlapping highways, duplicate nodes, and routing logic — would be greatly appreciated. If you're open to assisting with Savai’i or running QA using tools like JOSM Validator, Overpass, or MapRoulette, I’d be happy to collaborate and share notes.

Ultimately, my aim is to provide a vastly improved base map that can support the work of relevant authorities, the general public, and visitors alike.
ChromeLotus (2025-06-10 19:30:38+00:00): Hey OSM-SAMOA,
Thanks for your great work and collaborative replies. I am looking forward to seeing the OSM data in Samoa improve. After performing a JOSM validation of Upolu, I identified some validation flags that I later fixed; there were a few more instances of highway duplicate nodes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167401168), overlapping highways (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167402591), and crossing highways (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167404644). Please let me know if you need any additional help with your project.
-ChromeLotus
5m4u9 (2025-05-23 02:49:09+00:00): Hola, bienvenido!

gracias por añadir el negocio y más si recibe bitcoin. \o/.

Mejoré algunas cosas como el pago en efectivo, el tipo de gastronomía que sirve.
tux67 (2025-05-23 07:25:09+00:00): Hi - ich hab' das mal auf gültige Werte bei den Zahlungsarten angepasst:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:payment:*
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166641836
Die Telefonnummern werden nach dem ITU Standardschema erfasst. 
Wenn noch Fragen sind .. immer her damit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166632258
EvanSiroky (2025-06-21 21:23:59+00:00): Hi there. I see in a lot of changesets you are adding explicit bicycle=yes and foot=yes to roads where the implied values for these are already "yes". Is there a specific reason you're adding these values? Seems like it may not be necessary.
Morttt (2025-06-23 17:23:20+00:00): wandrer.com doesn't reliably pick up on "implied" values for these.
EvanSiroky (2025-06-23 21:27:00+00:00): Oh cool, you're also a Wandrer user! I just signed up this month.

I think there may be a difference of opinion here on what counts on Wandrer and what doesn't. According to https://wandrer.earth/filters, it says "...generally highway=trunk, trunk_link, footway, service, and bridleway are removed [from the list of roads]". 

I think it'd be good to have some alignment around whether these particular roads should count or not on Wanderer. You're right that they allow riding, but it seems like a better remedy here is to try to change Wandrer's algorithm instead of making these edits. The data in OpenStreetMap shows up not only in Wandrer but all other applications that consume OpenStreetMap data too, so this may have some other unintentional side effects. 

Btw, there's a discussion on Strava about this if you want to jump in: https://strava.app.link/1Nv0R2qzrUb
EvanSiroky (2025-07-01 18:20:55+00:00): Hello again. Just checking in about this. I'm wanting to make some mass edits to remove the "bicycle=yes" tags on various service roads where this value is implied. I'd be happy to chat if you feel strongly about this.
user_5359 (2025-05-23 11:19:31+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://osm/way/1388890713. What is the mean of the tags
CANTON = Redange
COMMUNE = Beckerich
DISTRICT = Diekirch
LAU2 = 0701
(no other OSM keys)?
Stereo (2025-05-23 19:46:30+00:00): Oh, that's a stray from my manual conflation. Thank you for spotting it!
aharvey (2025-05-23 03:09:13+00:00): hi, it would be helpful for others if you could explain your thinking and rationale in setting the place type each time you change it. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
shinterro (2025-05-24 17:32:43+00:00): Hi SrinivasK280902, thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap, as well as for reaching out and requesting review. I have some questions/comments regarding parts of this changeset.

First, you might review comments I recently left for another user editing nearby as they apply here too: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166587809#c1440123. In there I note:

- use of `wheelchair=unknown` is generally discouraged.
- Removal of generally valid `kerb` tags.
- Addition of `highway=crossing` in incorrect places.

There appear to be the removal of a number of valid driveways/crossings. Also, tags for the Equitable building were moved into a nearby way as a relation - the tagged information is still there, but the building itself is now gone.

Overall, I don't think a number of these changes fit common mapping practice, but with some time and the support of the OSM community, we can likely make fast and supportive improvement.

You mention PIDA in your changeset comments. Might that refer to "Pedestrian Infrastructure in Downtown Atlanta"? If you are part of a team/project, I highly recommend reaching out to the OSM community. Not only can we provide support, advice, and tooling, we may able to directly aid your project initiatives. You can find some community links here: https://openstreetmap.us/about/contact/, including a link to our OSM US Slack, where I usually am.

Thanks!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-14 05:00:11+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed doubtful import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167598911
NeisBot (2025-05-23 09:33:10+00:00): Hi MagdalenThot, and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

Over the past 7 days, you've made more than 100 changesets without adding any comment.

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added forest landuse and modified existing ways to improve mapping of wooded areas"
PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #AIgenerated
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-14 05:00:44+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed doubtful import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167598923
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-14 05:20:01+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed doubtful import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167599204
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-25 15:31:34+00:00): please, do not add fake street names just because OM is broken

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166740351
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-25 15:32:52+00:00): Czy https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8650954236 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8650924204 rzeczywiście mają inne kody pocztowe?
sebixordon (2025-05-27 21:07:51+00:00): Mój błąd. Kody zostały źle poprawione
Syl (2025-11-13 20:11:07+00:00): Bonjour, ce SIRET n'est toujours pas bon. Pouvez-vous vraiment corriger ce problème de votre côté ? C'est la troisième fois que je vous le signale.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-11-14 07:36:02+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour votre alerte, la correction a été effectuée.


Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
Glassman (2025-05-23 02:19:16+00:00): Thanks for fixing the tag
tastrax (2025-05-25 08:43:32+00:00): I am not sure that some of these roads are private given the Spring Bay Mill Complex (accommodation and camping)? https://www.springbaymill.com/
AntBurnett (2025-05-26 01:00:03+00:00): The change from access=no to access=private was intended to solve a routing issue. We were attempting to route from the site to the Tasman Highway, but Valhalla was using inappropriate roads/tracks. Investigation showed all the internal roads with access=no were preventing any routing. 

If the permissions need to be relaxed further, that's fine. We just need routing to be possible at all.

That the site is no longer a mill with port facilities makes our quest less relevant - thanks for the useful weblink!
aharvey (2025-05-23 03:03:24+00:00): hang on, mode specific access tags like motor_vehicle override the top level access. So if you set access=permit and then motor_vehicle=yes you're saying you need a permit, unless you're driving then you don't need a permit. Since this isn't the case, I suggest you can just leave out the specific modes, unless some modes aren't allowed, then you can just set access=permit as a catch all.
aharvey (2025-05-23 03:05:24+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

On the other hand if you do want to be expclit on who can access use something like no top level access=* tag, but then tag motor_vehicle=permit + bicycle=permit + foot=permit. In this case it sounds like you get a 3 day transit permit, I'm not sure how long a distance but do they grant this for walkers walking through?
Negreheb (2025-11-03 09:44:37+00:00): Hey, you might change that tag - the wiki-page was created by one guy to be able to change stuff up. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:museum%3Dopen_air
so outdoor=yes instead of museum:type=open_air
PeterCooperJr (2025-11-03 12:26:27+00:00): I don't know as I have a strong opinion one way or the other, but if outdoor=yes is more common then sure, I'll change it.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-14 04:49:15+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167598765
Dimacn (2025-05-24 04:50:04+00:00): Пожалуйста придерживайтесь правил OSM - до н.п. должна идти хотя бы одна дорога типа unclassified. Качество дороги указывается другими тегами и практически не связано со статусом дороги. Теперь получилось что Кедровка оказалась в изоляции - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1202033351  Пожалуйста исправьте и не заставляйте других маперов исправлять за вами.
Joseph R P (2025-05-26 20:37:10+00:00): Hello and thank you for adding these new streets here! For future reference, the best classification for small neighborhood streets like these would be residential road rather than tertiary and secondary roads, which are usually for larger, busier major roadways. Thanks!
Richspokey (2025-05-27 03:21:20+00:00): Thank you very much. I apologize, I will be more careful in my classifications
4004 (2025-05-25 23:50:50+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
так там доброном или маяк?
user_5359 (2025-05-24 10:24:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the mean of the tag servicio = Keratina?
HirschKauz (2025-05-23 13:36:34+00:00): Hi! 
statt einen neuen Fußweg mit säntlichen Kreuzungen zu den Einfahrten und Nebenstraßen zu zeichnen geht das viel einfacher: 
die Straße auswählen und dort ein sidewalk=* setzten. als Wert dann left, right oder both (je nachdem) 
Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166636711
VLD549 (2025-07-12 09:56:49+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes.
The only thing I can find that kind of describes it is this:

https://www.toutendroit.com/article-crapen-lomeven-774153/

Could you provide a link of some sort that shows it to be Grapen Lomeven?

Thank you in advance!
NeisBot (2025-05-23 05:13:35+00:00): Hi Lennon84, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 98% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 13 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=166637972
NeisReview (2025-05-23 05:39:37+00:00): 🤷‍♀️🤷‍♂️ Mapper deleted their own data.
lonvia (2026-06-09 12:37:47+00:00): This changeset has accidentally added 4 objects with `addr:housenumber=https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=18/56.763665/36.049780`. I can just remove the bad tags. However, maybe you still know what house numbers there should be and can make a better fix.
Tomas Straupis (2025-06-20 09:37:39+00:00): Ir šitas irgi ar tikrai parduotuvė? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1388924990
DaanLT (2025-06-20 09:55:33+00:00): Labas, ne klaida. Shop reik trinti
NeisBot (2025-05-23 07:56:57+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-05-29 09:07:59+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/166909797
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-14 05:17:55+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed doubtful import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167599140
fredlenoir (2025-10-24 07:49:01+00:00): Bonjour, cette voie de Bus - avec l'arrivée du tram - est devenue une piste cyclable  > Hughway= cycleway (et cela jusqu'au carrefour avec la rue des guillemins). travaux terminés voici 3 semaines
Sylabowy Kot (2025-10-24 12:13:49+00:00): Zmiana wycofana: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173714882

Nie został zmieniony obszar działalności, a budynek. Wcześniejsze dodanie nazwy na budynek było minimalną zmianą, ale nadal dobrą.
Poprawię na właściwszy sposób tagowania.
nevw (2025-05-23 06:21:20+00:00): Hi, you could have left the address info at the old address and just deleted the NAA details.
Have you entered a node with NAA details at the new address?
You have accidentally shifted a highway=crossing node. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166638574
I can fix this if you prefer.
SAM SAM SAM NOT SAM (2025-05-23 06:25:56+00:00): HI Sorry, first time using openstreet. If you could please fix it much appreciated. Thak you
SAM SAM SAM NOT SAM (2025-05-23 06:26:55+00:00): Sorry I havent entered NAA details for the new address
nevw (2025-05-23 08:35:02+00:00): The old site building has been razed and roads constructed on old site so mapped roads and left address off.
I entered the new NAA site details and fixed shifted node.
Cheers...Keep on mapping
SAM SAM SAM NOT SAM (2025-05-26 01:22:47+00:00): Thanks a lot....much appreciated!