piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kechan_tagfix (2023-01-19 01:08:44+00:00): On the OSM wiki, building=offices was listed as a mistake. That is all I was going off of.
SomeoneElse (2023-01-29 22:49:48+00:00): The OSM wiki is supposed to describe how people map things, not tell them how to map.
The wiki page that you refer to explicitly says:
"building=offices 
If you know places with this tag, verify if it could be tagged with another tag.
Automated edits are strongly discouraged unless you really know what you are doing!"

Are you saying here that you took no steps whatsoever to verify your change before reading (and it seems not understanding) a wiki page?
kechan_tagfix (2023-01-31 18:03:02+00:00): yes
kechan_tagfix (2023-01-31 18:03:45+00:00): I will try to look more into things before making a change from something on the osm wiki
SomeoneElse (2023-02-02 13:32:06+00:00): Thanks
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:10:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:10:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:05:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
eggie (2023-01-15 15:33:35+00:00): Dag Merijn.. Check steeds of je wegen wel aan elkaar zitten. De brug heb ik vast gemaakt aan voetpad Boezemnolen. Bij die verdubbeling van de Viergang zit ook nog ergens een fout.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131301704
MVG
eggie.
eggie (2023-01-15 15:35:18+00:00): Aaah.. De straatnaam ontbreekt. 
Kijk je nog even?
Gr eggie
Anil Basnet (2023-03-24 17:11:38+00:00): Wrong mapping. Non existing farmland has been traced inside a forest. Please delete it.
jcr83 (2023-05-04 20:18:11+00:00): Bonjour,
Je trouve bizarre la façon dont vous avez tagué la piste cyclable. Pourquoi ne pas avoir mis highway=cycleway ?
EstebanM (2023-05-23 09:38:15+00:00): Je n'étais pas sûr de mémoire s'il s'agissait officiellement d'une voie verte ou d'une piste cyclable. Comme beaucoup de pistes sont officiellement des voies vertes et qu'elles sont indiquées ainsi j'avais choisi cette option.

C'est une de mes premières contributions, merci pour votre indulgence.
NorthCrab (2023-01-16 00:49:15+00:00): Numer domu nie umieszczamy w ulicy a w numerze domu. Pozdrawiam!
Shaun das Schaf (2023-01-15 18:55:03+00:00): Hallo M@blung, willkommen bei OSM!

Bitte vermeide es so gut es geht, private Angaben in OSM einzutragen. OSM soll kein Telefonbuch oder Klingelschildverzeichnis sein. Wenn du natürlich ein eigenes Gewerbe oder einen Handwerksbetrieb o.ä. hast, dann macht es wiederum Sinn einen Betreiber einzutragen (dann muss aber natürlich auch das Gewerbe oder der Betrieb eingetragen werden).

Bitte benutze den name-Tag auch nur für den tatsächlichen Namen eines Objekts. Nachnamen oder das Wort "Carport" sind keine richtigen Namen für Carports oder Häuser.

Gebäudetypen kannst du durch den building-tag genauer spezifizieren. Zum Beispiel building=carport für den Carport und building=detached für ein Einfamilienhaus. Mehr dazu findest du auf den entsprechenden Seiten im OSM Wiki.

Das Carport wird vermutlich keine eigene Adresse haben, schon gar nicht dieselbe wie das fast danebenstehende Haus.

Ich habe diese Probleme noch entsprechend korrigiert und private Angaben entfernt:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131310110

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
M@blung (2023-01-15 22:22:35+00:00): Dankeschön
little_maper (2023-01-16 13:55:32+00:00): Hello Lamassu;
I noticed you added many streets have "oneway=yes" and it didn't connect to another street, My opinion is to change it to under construction.
Some examples:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1132203475
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1132203477
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1132203474
Could you check it and fixed it, please?
Regards
little_maper
LockOnGuy (2023-01-16 14:01:48+00:00): @little_maper done in changeset 131339609. Regards.
little_maper (2023-01-16 14:50:58+00:00): Thank you.
Claudius Henrichs (2023-06-22 21:23:59+00:00): Hi Lamassu,
You added most of the Kerbala International Airport grounds as part of this changeset and quoted "Esri World Imagery" as source. While I can see the Western runway under construction in ESRI imagery, there is no trace of the Eastern runway and the central terminals. Are these already construction finished today? All information I could find online lead me to believe that this airport is still far from finished in June 2023. Do you have some more up to date sources?
user_12523467 (2023-06-22 23:31:18+00:00): Hello  Claudius Henrichs,

The entire airport is under construction, and it has not been officially opened. The things I added are that you can see and confirm through the implementing company’s website here if you like: https://alphaware.co.kr/xe/sub_31 Greetings to you.
literan (2023-01-16 17:31:37+00:00): вообще-то вы его сломали ( или недоправили) :-)

Исправлю.
eggie (2023-01-15 16:46:14+00:00): Dag Huub Beckers..
Wanneer de paden niet meer als pas bestaan in het veld kunnen ze natuurlijk weg, maar als ze er nog wel zijn, maar niet meer toegankelijk dan zetten we die paden in de regel op access=no  met evt een note=...  erbij met uitleg.
Wanneer de paden als vanzelf verdwijnen zetten we de paden vervolgens nog op disused:highway=path

Dat zie je dan niet meer op de kaart.
Wat nu gaat gebeueren is dat een andere mapper de paden gewoon weer gaat intekenen.
Ze zijn wellicht in het veld te zien en in de BGT transparant zijn ze gewoon nog te zien incl. naam.

Ik kan het voor je terugdraaien.. Dan kun je de de paden splitsen en de bewuste delen op access=no zetten.
Graag reactie

MVG
eggie
Huub Beckers (2023-01-15 18:26:01+00:00): Beste "Eggie",
Ik ben inderdaad niet ervaren en bedank je voor de "Feedback".
Kun je inderdaad dit dan terugdraaien.
Dan zal ik ervoor zorgen dat acces= no er bij komt te staan. Zoals je al begrepen hebt had ik met de gemeente Valkenburg hierover gecommuniceerd. 
Groet Huub
eggie (2023-01-15 18:29:39+00:00): Oke... moment dan draai ik het terug. Dan knip je de wegen op het zet de ontoegankelijke op access=no met een note of evt. Volgens dr aanwijzingen boven.
Wordt vervolgd..
eggie (2023-01-15 18:31:45+00:00): reverted on request by changeset #131309301

Je kunt je gang weer gaan
Succes,
eggie
eggie (2023-01-16 09:24:53+00:00): Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131310222
eggie (2023-01-15 18:33:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Tomas Straupis (2023-01-15 18:02:19+00:00): Hello. Please do not break existing tagging. iD is a bad editor and it is suggesting incorrectly to change the tagging of landuse=basin, landuse=reservoir (and other bad suggestions).
Atalanttore (2023-01-15 18:12:29+00:00): iD is the editor used by openstreetmap.org. You should complain to its developers about this editor making bad suggestions for users, but not to me.
Tomas Straupis (2023-01-15 18:17:22+00:00): iD coders do not care. JOSM is also openstreetmap editor and much better. I'm only asking you not to change tagging in the country you do not know. Thank you.
Atalanttore (2023-01-15 22:56:37+00:00): Are you the local mapping lord and the OpenStreetMap documentation[1] is wrong too?
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwater
Tomas Straupis (2023-01-16 05:29:16+00:00): FYI: wiki is just an opinion of some/few people. It has never been and is not an "official documentation". There are different ways how things can be mapped. And yes, that wiki page as many others depicts just an opinion of some people with many mappers having a different opinion.
jeslop (2023-02-17 10:44:50+00:00): Reverted on changeset #132668963.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Gonéo (2023-01-21 18:51:32+00:00): Pas de remarque particulière, merci pour cette contribution.
AndresDuhour (2023-05-18 20:33:46+00:00): Buenas tardes! te consulto porque hay un tramo de la calle etiquetado como service=alley que solo está conectado con caminos peatonales. Y quería saber si ese tramo sería peatonal o por dónde tiene salida a la calle.
Saludos!
Andrés
Harel M (2023-01-16 06:58:43+00:00): Image links as a link to a page in wikimedia is not a great way to expose links in OSM.
Can you please elaborate why this change was made?
5R-MFT (2023-01-16 07:09:54+00:00): The image link was already there in the former Version 2 but with https:// upload. I  didn't like to delete the image link, I changed it to the usual link and I added the wikimedia file link. 
Feel free to delete it or change to another image.
Frans S (2023-02-01 16:46:25+00:00): Hello. A remark about your mapping.
You connect nodes of roads to nodes of hedges. These are errors and need to be corrected. (9)
Don't add the tag area=yes to a hedge. It is not an area, just a fence.
About mapping of buildings. These are not required to be mapped. However, when you map them, be sure that the rectangular buildings are squared. (Q key) .
Don't cross a line of an already mapped residential area. Just move the nodes of the landuse area a bit aside, outside the buildings
Best regards
Frans S (2023-02-02 15:44:56+00:00): Hello again. About mapping and tagging of highways.
When you've read the wiki Highways in Africa, you will see that highways tagged as track are not to be used for through roads. These need to be tagged as unclassified (Lowest ranking) residential or path, depending on the location and width of the trace.
__________________________________
How to measure the width of a trace In Ideditor:
Command Ctr+shift+M  shows themeasuring dimensions tab.
After that command, select add line.
Zoom in very far (20 - 25 mtr) so that you have a good view on the shoulders of a road.
Then draw a line between the shoulders.
You can read the value in the measurement tab. (select Metric value)
<2 mtr tag it Path
> 2 mtr tag it unclassified, residential or track depending on the situation.
See the wiki African highways to decide which tag to be used.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa

Best regards
Gonéo (2023-01-21 18:51:22+00:00): Pas de remarque particulière, merci pour cette contribution.
kapazao (2023-01-16 11:53:04+00:00): Hi, thank you for your update, but you should check all the tags, not keeping brand:wikidata and brand:wikipedia from Dia.
Regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131305282
habi (2023-02-09 10:10:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25534796 ist schon Teil des Waldes, aber in einer sog. Relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21449
Deshalb ist der `landuse=forest`-Tag auf dem Umriss redundant.
habi (2023-02-09 10:13:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45077082/ heisst im Katasterplan Bern 'Buebebergwald'.
Was ist deine Quelle für den Namen?
jce70 (2023-02-15 12:34:09+00:00): 1) Im Zuge des Abtrennens vom Solrütiwald nicht richtig abgeschlossen. Danke für den Hinweis.
2) Danke für die Korrektur. Habe mich vom 'Quartier-Namen' verleiten lassen.
Quelle (map.geo.admin.ch Leyer:Geografische Namen swissNAMES3D)
GUFSZ (2023-01-16 16:50:47+00:00): Ich habe etwas zu schnell auf den Absendebutton geklickt.
Wegweiser, Bänke eingetragen und lcn=yes an Wege gehängt.
habi (2023-02-09 09:33:52+00:00): Hier ebenfalls; schön pflegst du die Namen, aber kannst du angeben, was die Quelle ist?
jce70 (2023-02-15 12:36:02+00:00): map.geo.admin.ch Leyer:Geografische Namen swissNAMES3D
habi (2023-02-15 13:02:09+00:00): 👌🏼, das könntest/solltest du im Kommentar angeben.
Lädst du die Daten als Hintergrund in iD, oder schaust du das in zwei Browser-Fenster?
jce70 (2023-02-15 23:36:18+00:00): In mehreren Fenster sogar.
Colbertson (2023-01-15 17:03:43+00:00): Sveiki!
Piebraucamiem ceļiem lieto higway=service un service=driveway
Vairāk info te:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines#Piebrauk%C5%A1anas_ce%C4%BCi_lauku_s%C4%93t%C4%81m
str (2024-01-13 19:28:15+00:00): Moikka! Muutin level=*-tagit takaisin, koska 0 on katutasossa ja level=1 kerros sen yläpuolella. Lisätietoja sivulla https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level
gscholz (2023-12-13 09:30:07+00:00): Hi Gauchodelsur,
your activities, like in this changeset, have left behind a huge amount of broken boundary relations:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-67.71384&lat=-53.78741&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131305874

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guidoi
mueschel (2023-01-21 11:21:42+00:00): Stehen hier wirklich 24 Feuerlöscher nichtmal 10 Meter auseinander? Und was heißt das neue Tag "fire_extinguishing:medium"?
plennert (2023-01-21 11:38:31+00:00): also ich sehe hier 4 und keine 24.

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1qqi
plennert (2023-01-21 11:38:59+00:00): das Dach wird von 4 Stützen getragen, an jeder ist einer montiert.
plennert (2023-01-21 11:40:19+00:00): Danke für Deine Aufmerksamkeit.
mueschel (2023-01-21 11:42:48+00:00): Was bedeutet dann "quantity=6"?
plennert (2023-01-21 11:56:08+00:00): du kannst unten nachlesen was/wie/warum ... Ich hoffe es hilft Dir weiter. Fragen/Wünsche und Anregungen nehme ich gerne entgegen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brandschutz_mit_OSM#Feuerl%C3%B6scher_/_Handfeuerl%C3%B6scher_(HFL)
mueschel (2023-01-21 12:09:17+00:00): Das macht keinen Sinn. "quantity" bedeutet eine Anzahl von irgendetwas. Nennenswerte Benutzung bisher nur zum Zählen bei Sportplätzen.

Für Volumen oder Füllmenge haben wir "capacity" oder "weight" oder "volume" (am häufigsten als water_tank:volume). 

Außerdem muss eine Einheit angegeben werden. Gewicht hat als Default Tonnen.
plennert (2023-01-21 12:25:50+00:00): das mag dir auf den ersten Blick so erscheinen.
die/eine offizielle übersetzung von Löschmittelmenge ist "quantity of extinguishing agent" (nach dem vds fachwörterbuch brandschutz). daraus habe ich kurz "quantity" abgeleitet. alles andere schien mir zu lange, zu unpassend und hat keinerlei Verbindung zum Begriff Löschmittelmenge.
capacity passt übehaupt nicht, da mit Stückzahl übersetzt/gleichgesetzt, ebensowenig wie volume (Volumen ungleich Masse/Gewicht) oder water_tank; volume.
Ist vielleicht nicht der Weisheit letzter Schluss ...
habi (2023-02-09 09:28:32+00:00): Super hast du hier die Namen hinzugefügt.
Kannst du, wenn du das machst noch die Quelle angeben?
Im Katasterplan Bern - den wir für die Anpassungen in OpenStreetMap verwenden dürfen - sind die Namen übrigens genau so drin.
zstadler (2023-01-17 13:23:56+00:00): Hello Sokuya,

Dizengoff Center is an invalid multi-polygon.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Overlapping,_unclosed_member_ways_belonging_to_the_same_role

The buildings and the bridges are all "outer" and they touch one another.
zstadler (2023-01-25 16:56:45+00:00): שלום יצחק,

OSM
זה לא מקום להכנסת הודעות למטיילים על ידי יצירת מיפוי פקטיבי

אני מעדיף שאתה תמחוק את הנקודה שייצרת
Yitzchak M (2023-01-25 18:36:44+00:00): I have reluctantly deleted the warning. Why does IHM not provide a mechanism to warn hikers and travelers of potential dangers? That is called "providing an essential public service".
zstadler (2023-01-26 06:26:47+00:00): We can have a separate discussion about IHM via e-mail.

This is about OSM and its practices, such as "Don't use name tag to describe things" and "Don't map temporary events and temporary features"

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
Yitzchak M (2023-01-26 06:46:02+00:00): 1) OSM - understood and accepted!

2) IHM - I will be in touch later on via email.
kakiremora (2023-01-16 03:42:55+00:00): Witam,
Jaki był powód zmian? Nowa wersja linii nie "idzie środkiem" jezdni.

Pozdrawiam
NorthCrab (2023-01-16 04:53:35+00:00): Chyba to są zmiany wizualne. W tym przypadku uważam że niepotrzebne jest stosowania reguły środka jezdni bo na skrzyżowaniach czasami dziwnie to wygląda. Mi osobiści odpowiada nowa geometria niż to co było tutaj poprzednio. Czy jest idealnie? Nie, ale jest lepiej.
Gonéo (2023-01-21 19:19:10+00:00): Est-ce que la route est barrée pour une longue durée ? D'une manière générale OpenStreetMap ne gère pas les infos traffic. On n'indique ceci que pour les longues durées. En effet, le temps que les applications prennent en compte le changement (parfois jusqu'à un mois) les travaux sont souvent terminés et on se retrouve avec une information obsolète.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131306553
habi (2023-02-09 09:00:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105586733  hat nicht `name=Landorf`, die Heilpädagogische Schule ist schon korrekt mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103261356 erfasst
jce70 (2023-02-15 12:43:24+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur
HellMap (2023-01-15 21:27:16+00:00): Sveiki!

Pamanīju pievienoto satiksmes nomierināšanas punktu, bet tas izskatās diezgan dīvaini šādā vietā.

Vai varētu precizēt, kas tieši bija domāts ar to? Vai šeit tiešām ir izveidots uz ceļa grunts segums ar nolūku samazināt braucēju ātrumu?

Paldies
felipeeugenio (2023-01-24 11:43:31+00:00): Hola. El que una vereda sea muy ancha no significa que deba ser mapeada así. Las calles claramente no son pedestrians si un vehículo puede pasar de manera libre por ellas. Es un error común en todo caso. No te preocupes.
Para veredas se usa sidewalk=left/right/both
para la cantidad de pistas se usa lanes=

saludos y por favor no dudes en consultar en el chat de Telegram
eggie (2023-01-15 18:35:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Feedback..  Eigenlijk zo'n beetje het enige wat we niet zelf intekenen zijn gebouwen (en adressen) 
Die worden periodiek geïmporteerd.
Je kunt het wel versnellen middels een laagdrempelig verzoek op het forum van OSM in het draadje BAG importverzoeken.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43
Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-01-15 18:45:03+00:00): Even als voorbeeld een verzoek ingediend ook voor de omliggende lege plekken..
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/408

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-01-16 07:31:20+00:00): De wijk heeft inmiddels een update ondergaan..
Groet
eggie
mueschel (2023-01-18 11:20:04+00:00): Hi,
you added the tags
radiopolska_name
radiopolska_url
which seem to be duplicates of name and website. Are these tags really needed?
NorthCrab (2023-01-18 11:45:40+00:00): I agree with those being unnecessary duplicates.
KMadura (2023-01-18 17:43:00+00:00): The radiopolska_* tags were added on purpose on numerous such locations, my idea is to tie nodes with broadcast locations in the radiopolska listings. This is done in cooperation with my friends running radiopolska website, because we would like to pinpoint exact object on a map and also fix any possible coordinates errors in their data. I could possibly remove radiopolska_name tags, but radiopolska_url which contains an ID is a must if we want to automate synchronization. "website" tag here can be removed (I'll do it) as it is in fact a duplicate
mueschel (2023-01-18 17:49:48+00:00): I don't no this website, how "important" is it? OSM shouldn't be full of tags for various minor web pages, but reference numbers to widely used directories are acceptable.

If they should be in OSM, please consider adding only the reference number, in a "ref:XYZ" tag like
ref:radiopolska = 1234
KMadura (2023-01-18 18:04:39+00:00): Ok, thank you, I will replace all those changes soon with what you have suggested. I wasn't sure if my initial idea was good or not, apologies for not asking the community first.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-15 23:07:10+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism by sockpuppet: 
changeset/131317129
wardmuylaert (2024-02-29 14:14:59+00:00): Weet je toevallig nog of dit deel van voetweg 45 ook privé is / niet toegankelijk is? Ik zie (op de OSM kaart) dat de rest access=no is en dat deze weg ook voorbij een gate lijkt te liggen (al heeft de gate raar genoeg enkel access informatie over fietsers en voetgangers, niet auto's).
Tom Ameye (2024-02-29 16:07:41+00:00): IK heb het op access=no gezet omdat er een hekken geplaatst is, maar dat is bij mijn weten onterecht. Voetweg 45 is niet afgeschaft noch verlegd en hoort vrij toegankelijk te zijn en onderhouden te worden door de gemeente. Hopelijk maken ze daar eens werk van.
wardmuylaert (2024-02-29 16:17:53+00:00): Emailtje erover sturen naar het gemeentebestuur? Ik woon wel niet in deze gemeente, dus op mij zullen ze misschien niet meteen letten.
Tom Ameye (2024-02-29 16:47:51+00:00): Die hebben van mij al een lange lijst met kansen om buurt- en voetwegen te heropenen... Met een simpele mail geraken zo'n problemen helaas niet opgelost vrees ik, maar we werken eraan ;-)
Frans S (2023-01-17 10:42:18+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards. A year ago I've sent you also these comments on your mapping quality.

Please pay attention to next points:
A: Buildings not accurate drawn
E: Buildings not squared.
F Mapping of buildings hidden by trees
Overlapping buildings.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131308841
danvyr (2023-02-05 12:20:54+00:00): reverted in 132106804
elot360 (2023-01-18 18:10:16+00:00): Ale czemu usunąłeś cały landuse, zamiast zmienić jego nazwę na budowę bazy postojowej PKP Intercity, co byłoby zgodne z prawdą?
https://www.intercity.pl/pl/site/o-nas/dzial-prasowy/aktualnosci/pkp-intercity-inwestuje-w-stacje-postojowa-w-krakowie.html
NorthCrab (2023-01-19 10:35:56+00:00): Przywróciłem i zmieniłem nazwę: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131459097
elot360 (2023-01-19 10:47:36+00:00): Dziękuję!