piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-23 07:51:08+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8972684091
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1469703355

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rarad74 (2026-01-23 09:12:54+00:00): Strazi neconectate, sensuri unice lipsa. Bataie de joc!
Dimitar155 (2026-01-23 11:11:57+00:00): sport=ludo

Ludo е и английското име на играта.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludo
Anonymous36863 (2026-01-23 12:29:09+00:00): Благодаря
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-24 14:21:18+00:00): Hi, just a test?
chris2map (2026-07-19 16:28:06+00:00): I think you can delete it. No information will be lost.
NeisRevert (2026-07-19 16:40:06+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/186016923
Comment: "Remove testdata"
A67-A67 (2026-01-23 11:12:01+00:00): De waarde 'permissive' is voor een eigen weg waar normaal verkeer wel door mag, terwijl uit eerdere wijzigingen blijkt dat alleen bewoners deze weg mogen gebruiken. Private was dus de correcte waarde.

De toegang voor hulpdiensten was al getagd met emergency=yes. Als een navigiatiesysteem voor hulpdiensten je niet over deze weg stuurt, ligt de fout bij de dat navigatiesysteem, niet bij de Openstreetmap-data.
OSM-Contributer (2026-01-23 08:30:06+00:00): Near Kacheri Railway Station
Udarian (2026-01-23 16:41:26+00:00): please stop doing this, there are literal highway=construction ways under the service roads you added within a construction area, there is active construction in the area, this is something that I can attest to as I drive by often. Please be more careful next time you add service roads.

Happy Mapping,
Udar.
Vinny's Workshop (2026-05-05 15:32:04+00:00): Why did you make the ramps secondary links instead of motorway links? Is this a mistake or is there a reason you changed it?
Frans S (2026-02-06 10:28:33+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. Well mapped.
About tagging buildings. 
Default buildings ought to be tagged as building=yes because we cannot see what the purpose is of a building. We leave that to local mappers.
Please do not cluster buildings eithter.
DimaLebedev (2026-01-23 11:01:03+00:00): #mapbox_missing_roads
karr4s (2026-04-25 07:48:59+00:00): Salut.
Pour info : je crois qu'il y a un doublon dans les tags dans les adresses ajoutées : addr:housnumber // numero

;)
Bandino (2026-04-25 09:51:44+00:00): Salut. Merci de l'info. J'ai mal fait le ménage en intégrant la BAL. Je vais reprendre ça.
VictorIE (2026-01-25 11:53:41+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1100658041/

Could you check the name here? :)
HellMap (2026-03-19 16:00:53+00:00): Čau,

Kā jau minētu, nekartē lūdzu vienu objektu vairākas reizes kartē. Šeit DUS amenity=fuel bija iekartēts trīs reizes - kā laukums, kā punkts un kā ēka - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1469730038, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2200265297, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1469730037 .
HellMap (2026-03-19 16:17:48+00:00): Šeit veikals divreiz https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1339243889, šeit stāvvieta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1472984150, šeit DUS https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1487120155, šeit rotaļu laukums https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1488829126
Mister_R2 (2026-03-23 06:53:23+00:00): Saprotu, ik pa laikam nepamanu informācijas veida punktu. Tikai īsti nesapratu par veikalu problēmu... tur bija arī punkta veida veikals?
HellMap (2026-03-23 09:59:21+00:00): Jā, veikalam bija šis punkts https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6576756038/history tur pat, kur ēka ar `shop=convenience`.
Mister_R2 (2026-03-23 14:27:59+00:00): Oki!
mueschel (2026-01-28 11:46:55+00:00): Hi,
what does 'tickets_points' mean? This tag isn't used in other places.
NeisBot (2026-01-24 07:43:32+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/205716630 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-01 07:00:43+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/177765594
silversurfer83 (2026-01-23 19:11:57+00:00): Moin.

Bitte die ref=* nicht doppelt erfassen. Sie hat nichts im Namen verloren.

Bitte alle Parkplätze vom 23.1. nochmal anfassen und die ref aus dem Namen entfernen, danke.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177600690
Niederpruem (2026-01-23 20:57:09+00:00): Ganz Ennepetal dürfte nun keinen ref mehr im Namen haben. Ich habe auch die ref rausgenommen, die ich gar nicht reingeschrieben habe.
silversurfer83 (2026-01-23 22:05:59+00:00): Danke :)
rarad74 (2026-01-23 10:21:19+00:00): Este deja gata. Nu e nevoie sa intervii tu. Tu esti un cancer nedorit pe aici.
NeisBot (2026-01-24 07:43:36+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1469743632 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Marketing agency office"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : "Bureau d'une agence de marketing"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
AgenceWAM (2026-01-24 09:38:22+00:00): Modification done. Description more factual. Ok for you ?
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-24 09:52:35+00:00): Thank you for the update 👍

The description is already much more neutral. However, the detailed list of services (SEO, SEA, Social Ads, etc.) is still quite close to promotional / SEO-style content and does not really add useful information for the map and its users.

A simpler wording such as “Digital marketing agency” or “Digital marketing consultancy” would be more appropriate for OSM.

Best regards,
Pascal
AgenceWAM (2026-01-24 13:44:21+00:00): I understand, thank you for your advice. "Marketing agency" is a very broad term; do you have any suggestions for how to define it more precisely without sounding too promotional?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 10:09:21+00:00): Split SEO POI out to separate POI node rather than invalid nested building inside building that is not a separate structure or housenumber, and fixed/cleaned up remaining SEO and malformed tagging, in changeset 184424725

https://osm.org/changeset/184424725
Udarian (2026-01-23 17:36:49+00:00): again, please be more careful next time, these service roads no longer exist.

happy mapping,
Udar.
silversurfer83 (2026-01-23 20:10:27+00:00): Moin Herbert :)

sieht ganz gut aus. Ein Hinweis noch: Wenn du nachdem du den Objekttyp ausgewählt die Taste "Q" drückst werden die Gebäude schön rechtwinklig. Sieht dann besser aus.

Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177602514
Frans S (2026-01-24 09:45:30+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
An advise. Check the Mapbox imagery as well when the objects are bad to identify. New mappings need to be aligned with the Bing Imagery.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177602740
arvdk (2026-01-30 06:46:06+00:00): Complimenten, dat ziet er strak uit :)
Compliments, that looks really nice.
Probelnijs (2026-01-30 08:50:02+00:00): Dankje :) Ik zag een tijd geleden dat de nieuw gebouwde wijk Weideveld daar wel wat aandacht kon gebruiken; en als je dan eenmaal bezig bent haha.. (Het helpt ook als er nog geen grote bomen staan.)
werbuli (2026-04-21 14:03:46+00:00): Habe dein Fixme als Tag bei siren:purpose ergänzt. Schau mal ob die Tags zum Mast passen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:emergency%3Dsiren
TornadoFang (2026-04-24 06:58:43+00:00): passt
fmc_6 (2026-01-27 15:54:20+00:00): Hey, irgendwie sieht der Weg hier unvollständig aus: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/589682233
Kein tracktype an der Stelle und direkt im Tunnel beginnt der Radweg? :)
alamero (2026-01-27 16:05:03+00:00): Super, danke für den Hinweis. Ist gefixt! :)
VA00 (2026-07-04 15:43:40+00:00): Co to za trasa? Nie ma żadnej nazwy?
NeisBot (2026-01-24 07:43:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13478805524 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Skup złomu"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Skup złomu"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-26 16:50:50+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177618912
NeisBot (2026-01-24 07:36:34+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/469421429 v3 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1047453148 v2 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/2217884287 v11
https://osm.org/node/369673990 v20

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177603528
NeisRevert (2026-01-24 08:24:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/177637185
where the comment is: "🔄 Revert of unintended geometry change"
Rainero (2026-03-18 16:15:37+00:00): Revert mit changeset/180067489
(unzulässige Quelle)
Fraxi (2026-01-23 14:02:54+00:00): Hi,
please, pay attention to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13478842406 I think there should be drawn a service way through the lift gate(which connects some street with the parking). It is missing. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier
Shall you fix it?
Fraxi (2026-01-23 14:09:53+00:00): As for node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13478842404/, a more suitable tag could be entrance=garage. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_entrance If https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1469750904 does not lead to an underground parking(in Bulgarian "гаражна рампа"), or to rooftop/multistorey parking, the tag for the garage entrance might be changed.
countzer0 (2026-01-23 14:10:20+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for the comment. Please feel free to fix it, as I am not sure how to do what you are suggesting.
Fraxi (2026-01-23 14:44:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177612452
I connected https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1122687228 with the parking, elongated https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1469750904 and changed the tags. Used MAF Orthophoto. If anything is wrong with the geometry, you may fix.
Yog Sot (2026-01-23 13:51:06+00:00): thx for that, those capitalizations were not very consistent
eggie (2026-01-23 16:41:21+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

De Snelliusstraat lag nu ergens anders. 
Dat zal niet de bedoeling zijn geweest. Die heb ik teruggeplaatst.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=177604004

MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-23 19:53:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4424372742

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-23 12:41:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/832590913

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-23 19:03:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/832590913

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-23 19:53:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/832590913

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
derloris (2026-01-23 11:51:14+00:00): Hallo! Wollt hier nur nachfragen, weil ich auf Straßenansichten keine Einschränkung sehe: Hast du Hinweise auf access=private? Wenn nichts entsprechend ausgeschildert ist, bräucht man's auch nicht unbedingt einschränken, hätt ich gemeint. LG
Luzandro (2026-01-23 12:20:48+00:00): ehrlich gesagt habe ich das hier (neben dem Hinweis) in erster Linie aus Konsistenzgründen zur benachbarten Zufahrt gemacht, da es sich meiner Einschätzung nach in beiden Fällen um eine private Zufahrt auf einem Privatgrundstück handelt, wobei der access-Wert bei so einem kurzen service=driveway, der in einer Sackgasse endet, eigentlich nebensächlich ist
NeisBot (2026-01-24 07:43:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13478912268 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Office building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-01 07:00:43+00:00): 🗑️🤖 Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/177952739

 If you believe this deletion was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
NeisBot (2026-01-24 07:43:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13478938446 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "English School"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Szkoła angielska"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-01 07:00:44+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177952740
(No visible changes after review)
rempshaener (2026-01-23 17:40:53+00:00): Hallo,
was ist die Quelle für diesen Weg: openstreetmap.org/way/1469763706?
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2026-01-23 18:11:55+00:00): Und wieso zeichnest du hier www.openstreetmap.org/way/1469763704 einen  Phantasieweg ein, den du dann mit einem Weg, den du von der Straße entkoppelst hast, verbindest?
rempshaener (2026-01-23 18:15:43+00:00): Der Weg opensteetmap.org/way/1469763701 ist überwiegend baulich nicht getrennt, das wird nicht separat erfasst. Außerdem kannst du dann am Haupt-Way nicht cycleway=track stehen lassen.
rempshaener (2026-01-23 18:17:10+00:00): Dein Changeset ist eigentlich ein Kandidat für einen Revert. Nur auf Grund der Größe - was übrigens auch nicht okay ist - wäre das nicht angemessen. Korrigierst du das alles selbst?
rempshaener (2026-01-24 17:37:46+00:00): Hallo,
noch mal zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1469763706:
Ich habe das mal von zwei Seiten fotografiert, https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=742435388923611 und https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=5865219377068839 .
Auf der einen Seiten ist das einer von zwei Traktorreifen, der so weit am Rand gefahren ist, dass da nicht mehr gepflügt wird. Auf der anderen Seite: nichts.
Ich habe den Weg gelöscht.
Auch die übrigen Probleme habe ich bereinigt.
Viele Grüße
rhhs (2026-01-24 18:50:23+00:00): Hi, glad to see you started adding to the map! I hope we have a new mapper?
To save yourself some work, you should know that many "ways' have default values that are assumed so you don't need to add them. A highway=footway is defined as a way only for pedestrians, so no need to add foot=designated, motor_vehicle=no, etc. :)
Keep up the good work!
countzer0 (2026-01-25 14:22:21+00:00): Hi,
I will keep that in mind when making future edits. I did one to many commits but hopefully this will improve in the future. There will probably be a lot of changes in the vacinity so I will update if i have time and see something new.
mueschel (2026-01-29 11:32:32+00:00): Hi,
is "min_hreight" [sic] you added here the step height at the entrance? That is often tagged as 'entrance:step:height'
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1469769024
rempshaener (2026-01-23 18:43:25+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Das Korrigieren des Fehlers ist natürlich grundsätzlich eine gute Idee. Problematisch ist eher, dass die Zisterne überhaupt einen Namen hat. Bei OSM gilt „name is the name only“. Zisterne ist aber bereits mit anderen Tags angegeben, das Unternehmen ergibt sich aus der direkten Nachbarschaft.
Vorschlag: Lasse es, wie es jetzt ist. Ich schreibe den ursprünglichen Ersteller an, damit er es korrigieren (=löschen) kann.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
bxl-forever (2026-01-23 14:07:25+00:00): "atm=yes" encore valable pour CBC Assurances ?
Saschbe (2026-01-23 14:31:18+00:00): atm=NO
James_OWORNTE (2026-03-22 22:10:05+00:00): Thank you for your contribution! The task was well mapped. I made some minor changes and simplified some of the nodes.
Once again, thank you for your participation!
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-28 08:51:13+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177795030
tjum (2026-07-30 14:17:22+00:00): Hallo,

du hast mit diesem Änderungssatz den Bücherpavillon an die Rückwand des Finanzamts verschoben. Das kommt mir sehr seltsam vor, da der Pavillon zumindest letzte Woche tatsächlich noch an seinem alten Standort an der Straßenbahnhaltestelle war - allerdings wurde er inzwischen ausgeräumt und geschlossen, ein amenity=public_bookcase ist es damit nicht mehr.

Da ich nicht in Ulm bin, kann ich gerade nicht nachschauen, ob an deinem neuen Standort ein Bücherschrank ist (der dann allerdings nicht der Bücherpavillon vom Ehinger Tor wäre) oder nix?
Yog Sot (2026-01-23 13:46:46+00:00): faktycznie byłeś na miejscu czy tylko zgadujesz jak teoretycznie jest?
szydzio (2026-01-23 14:29:34+00:00): Hej, byłem fizycznie, zobaczyć na własne oczy, w szczególności to obecne niby rondo przed przychodnią Arcanus.
Yog Sot (2026-01-23 14:41:17+00:00): okej, to zobacz czy dobrze zmieniłem kierunki w związku ze znakami c-9 na każdym wlocie
szydzio (2026-01-23 16:08:38+00:00): Hej, niestety, jakby to dziwnie nie brzmiało, organizacja ruchu na tym niby rondzie jest taka, że jadąc od Granicznej należy je zasadniczo objechać po lewej (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1469822471) bo stoi tam znak C-4, choć w sumie można też pojechać w prawo i objechać prawą stroną. Straszny gniot, ale tak teraz tam jest...
Yog Sot (2026-01-23 17:56:44+00:00): jeśli na przeciwko Osiedle Edwarda Raczyńskiego dalej stoi  C-9 to nie jest taki kierunek ruchu
A c-4 nakazuje też skręt, a nie jednokieruynkowość. 
Jednokierunkowośc jest tylko jesli z jednej strony stoi D-3 a z drugiej strony B-2. Jeśli stoi tylko B-2, to trza to relacjami robić, a nie jednokierunkowością. 
Jak organizacja jest gniotem, to mapowanie niestety podobnie.
szydzio (2026-01-23 18:17:36+00:00): Tak, z jednej strony stoi D-3 a z drugiej strony B-2.
rempshaener (2026-01-23 18:38:09+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You have requested a review of your edits.
You deleted the pool ‘for privacy reasons’.
OpenStreetMap records what is present on site. This also applies to private driveway or pools. The fact that it is not a public object is tagged with "access"- values. As long as it is visible on aerial photographs, someone will always enter it. 
I have therefore restored the pool. I have deleted the data that did not belong there (an address, for example).

Please get in touch if you have any questions.
Best regards
mueschel (2026-01-24 11:15:04+00:00): Hi,
you added some complicated opening hours here - unfortunately they won't be supported by any application - the tag doesn't foresee to add free text to the key. 

If hours are so complicated, the best is to simply link to the official website using "opening_hours:url"
NeisBot (2026-01-24 07:43:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13479040185 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Plot for sale"

#MapWithoutSpam