piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
scarapella (2026-05-31 21:25:21+00:00): Hi Hypsometric,

You are right, the dataset I used had everything run together in the gpx <name> field e.g.

  <wpt lat="48.350833801667399" lon="-92.476693426909449">
    <name>S30 INGERSOLL COVE</name>
    <type>Large Cam</type>
    <extensions>
      <ogr:lat>48.350833801667399</ogr:lat>
      <ogr:lon>-92.476693426909449</ogr:lon>
      <ogr:y_proj>5355426.496989728</ogr:y_proj>
      <ogr:x_proj>538771.44217333046</ogr:x_proj>
    </extensions>
  </wpt>

It's also consistent with some existing campsites that were mapped previously e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8177013985/

However, I agree that a more osm proper way is to split the name and ref into their dedicated fields.  so I took care of splitting the name and ref for all the campsites and picnic sites in the area.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183467713

Many of these fields also have ALL CAPS name= which should be switched to normal capitalization.  I will probably get to that eventually, but if you feel an urge to do it, please fee free. :-) 

-scarapella
Hypsometric (2026-05-31 21:34:30+00:00): Nice! I'll take a look at the all caps part. Glad to have someone else mapping back country stuff :-)
scarapella (2026-05-31 21:35:36+00:00): Sorry to steal your fun, but I found an easy way to do a regexp replacement. So I took care of them :-) 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183468327

Likewise, always a pleasure to find another backcountry mapper.
Hypsometric (2026-05-31 21:43:47+00:00): Nice! Thanks again :)
Jordi MF_import (2026-02-20 01:04:15+00:00): M'he equivocat en la descripció arrastrada d'una altra edició. En este changeset he actualitzat denominacions segons el CORPES de la RAE.
Adikso (2026-03-12 19:44:40+00:00): Z tego co widzę to nie jest poprawny adres strony. Tą stronę też IPN prowadzi, ale to nie dotyczy muzeum.
To jest chyba poprawny adres https://cph.ipn.gov.pl/
I też przeniesione jest chyba na inny adres
syntex (2026-07-13 00:27:07+00:00): To chyba link do innej instytucji
jptolosa (2026-02-25 18:38:43+00:00): Hello, according the Esri Imagery the geometry of the intersection of San Rafael with Circunvalación Juan Pablo II before of this changeset is the correct. In this changeset you drew a small non-existent double carriageway in the north side of San Rafael.
Regards.
GatunLake (2026-02-26 17:53:18+00:00): Hi jptolosa,
Thank you for reaching out, I agree with you and will change this back
osmviborg (2026-02-20 07:40:02+00:00): Fiktivt. Rute 16 stopper ved 'Hovedvej ender' skiltet.
NeisBot (2026-02-20 02:21:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/6602141607 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Optical comparator factory"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-28 05:33:15+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179157903
(Restore previous tags)
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-28 06:37:29+00:00): Spam
NeisBot (2026-02-20 02:27:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/5889941832 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Optical calibration facility"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-28 05:33:15+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179157904
(Restore previous tags)
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-28 06:37:47+00:00): Spam
samho1234567 (2026-02-20 03:12:45+00:00): Source:

https://pub-zhtb.hizh.cn/a/202602/16/AP6992eae8e4b08d8f2f468e91.html
arjunaraoc (2026-02-22 00:08:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my updates on your edits
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178799454
NeisBot (2026-02-20 03:45:21+00:00): Hi Chappy-2, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 highway(s)
- 1 name(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178799788
woodpeck (2026-02-20 10:31:38+00:00): The trail was already tagged with "access=no" meaning it was illegal to use. There is not reason for deleting it. Chappy-2, in the future if you encounter trails on OSM that exist in reality but are illegal to use, please add an access=private or access=no instead of deleting (which was already present in this case). See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
Enock4seth (2026-02-21 09:42:38+00:00): Hi Aliu_Paul, thanks for mapping, I have reused this road and reclassified it. Take a look at the various values for highway=* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Roads

Also a good getting started resource is https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/
NeisBot (2026-02-20 05:09:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13584063768 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Insurance office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-28 05:33:16+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178891023
arjunaraoc (2026-02-22 00:05:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my updates
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178802439
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-21 11:26:18+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1481028148/history has building = 78 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
arjunaraoc (2026-02-21 23:45:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178802619
arjunaraoc (2026-02-21 23:42:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dmosque and add additional required tags
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178802704
arjunaraoc (2026-02-21 23:34:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178802753
SomeoneElse (2026-04-21 22:36:20+00:00): Hello,
A bunch of trees were added with "denotation=urbanaccess=permissive_amenity=parking_capacity=58_capacity:disabled=2_covered=no_fee=no_operator=rogue_credit_union_operator:type=business_parking=surface_surface=asphalt" here, I guess that "urban" was meant?
Cheers,
Andy
NeisBot (2026-02-20 05:54:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13584024168 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Glass shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
nevw (2026-02-20 07:23:42+00:00): Hi, you have placed your building details near the road verge. You instead need to locate your business in osm at the building you operate from. Your business was relocated to the unit you occupy last time you added it.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12419668038
Please remove your misplaced duplicate and instead update the one correctly located.
nevw (2026-02-20 07:30:22+00:00): A comment regarding the same issue was made last time you added it to near the roadway and you were also informed about spam/advertising in edits too.
TheSwavu (2026-02-20 09:08:38+00:00): Also a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12419668038
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-04 06:10:37+00:00): Also, source is Google Maps which is strictly prohibited per OSM policy. Reported to DWG.
arjunaraoc (2026-02-21 23:27:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). No personally identifiable names for buildings, as OSM is a public dataset
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178803134
arjunaraoc (2026-02-21 23:20:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). No generic streetnames. I have fixed one of your edits
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178803225
Руслан Т (2026-03-04 14:49:56+00:00): Здравствуйте! На основании чего вы переименовываете официальное название республики?
FUZZY_42 (2026-03-04 14:54:52+00:00): Официальное название не переименовано.
Руслан Т (2026-03-04 14:58:03+00:00): name:ru так же должно оставаться Башкортостан, не нужно заниматься вандализмом.
FUZZY_42 (2026-03-04 15:07:19+00:00): Не обязательно, это не вандализм официальное название как было так и остаётся. 
Или на всех языковый name нужно приводить в один стандарт?
alexey_zakharenkov (2026-03-04 15:16:46+00:00): Если name содержит название на языке <lang> , то name:<lang> должно содержать в точности то же самое.
NeisBot (2026-02-20 06:12:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13584079339 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Law office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-28 17:33:02+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178891068
arjunaraoc (2026-02-21 23:24:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Sachivalayam works on saturday also. Please update for Saturday. Check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178803914
arjunaraoc (2026-02-21 23:15:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178804021
NeisBot (2026-02-20 06:24:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13584158590 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Medical office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-28 17:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179180206
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
arjunaraoc (2026-02-21 23:02:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178804097
A67-A67 (2026-02-20 10:40:12+00:00): Hi, 
In the Netherlands building are imported from the BAG government database. You can ask for an import in this forum topic https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/4228

I've made a request for this building.
Vika_Nosovich (2026-02-23 10:29:21+00:00): Hi,
A67-A67!
Thank you for your comment and request. We will take note of the information.
Best, Vika_Nosovich.
SessX6cf (2026-02-20 06:31:15+00:00): 描述有误, 应为添加英山尖及相关内容
pwbriggs (2026-07-31 19:16:57+00:00): This restaurant is open until 9 AM, for 22 hours of the day? Or did you mean 9PM a.k.a. 21:00?
arjunaraoc (2026-02-22 09:41:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178804262
arjunaraoc (2026-02-21 22:56:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Not a meaningful highway reverted
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178804367
BCNorwich (2026-02-21 07:53:43+00:00): Hi, I've removed the duplicated highways as they could disrupt routing
arjunaraoc (2026-02-22 09:34:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178804558
arjunaraoc (2026-02-22 09:29:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my updates
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178805003
FajrAl (2026-02-21 03:20:33+00:00): Tidak boleh semua garis ditambahkan tag batas administrasi. Kalau itu memang pagar atau dinding batas lahan, gunakan barrier=fence.
arjunaraoc (2026-02-21 22:53:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178805151
arjunaraoc (2026-02-21 23:02:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Could not check from aerial imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178805166
arjunaraoc (2026-02-21 22:46:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178879551
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178805283
yelisey90 (2026-02-20 09:33:24+00:00): like this rather:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178810133
NeisBot (2026-02-20 07:42:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13584243926 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Awning supplier"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-28 17:33:07+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179180208
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
impiaaa (2026-02-20 18:07:46+00:00): Thank you for contributing! The "addr:street" tag (the "street" in the address) should exactly match the name of the road, and in OSM abbreviations are expanded: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(do_not)
NeisBot (2026-02-20 08:26:38+00:00): 🌍 Willkommen bei OSM, ELARA Leitstellentechnik GmbH.
Danke für deine Beiträge!

Um die Zusammenarbeit zu erleichtern und anderen zu helfen, deine Änderungen zu verstehen, ist es am besten, wenn du eine kurze Beschreibung der von dir vorgenommenen Änderungen hinzufügst. Klar formulierte Kommentare helfen der Community, deiner Arbeit zu folgen und bessere Rückmeldungen zu geben. Du findest Tipps zum Schreiben guter Kommentare hier[1].

✅ Hier ist ein Beispielkommentar basierend auf deinen Karteneditierungen: "Aktualisierte Büroattribute auf IT und Software-Entwickler/Hersteller"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, ELARA Leitstellentechnik GmbH.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Updated office attributes to IT and software developer/manufacturer"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
Fraxi (2026-02-20 10:09:51+00:00): Сигурен ли сте за номера на адреса? Четните номера са от северната страна на булеварда.
simacekjakub (2026-02-21 17:50:31+00:00): I'd make the access restrictions for all the streets in the Barrandov Studio area, or maybe better to entrance/exit parts only. But not just to some streets. It feels incomplete to me now.
Eino81 (2026-02-21 18:37:36+00:00): Hi, then all streets there can be modified like that. I just updated these, because these appeared in our Wandrer map: https://ibb.co/ksrTkc3q (Wandrer gets the data from OSM and if something is "yes" for biking, it will appear there, and I am sure, I can cover them by bike... )
simacekjakub (2026-02-21 20:19:49+00:00): OK. But I'd like to know whether you know this place personally and are you sure you cannot go there just like that?

I work in this area and actually, there are gates for cars but it's free to pass for pedestrians and others. It is a private area, but in reality accessible for public with no checks at the entrances.
Eino81 (2026-02-21 20:31:06+00:00): Well, I just see the gates, never dared to go in, since my Czech is not so good to explain them, why I would bike there just for "no reason"... You said, it is "private" area, we have also "private" option for that. And also, I guess, if I go there on a weekend, maybe it is harder to get in... I cycled whole Prague and if I saw such an area, closed by gates, fences, etc, that was always a no-go zone for me. But, if you think, we can change it back, just please, let the bike option out as "customers" maybe...
simacekjakub (2026-02-21 20:54:02+00:00): Actually, it is free to go anytime for anyone. Weekends, workdays, it's always the same. Cars have the only limitation that they need to pay for entrance/parking, that's the only limitation at the gate. Motorcycles, bicycles and pedestrians go around freely and legally.

I know that when you don't know this place, you don't know the rules, it can be confusing.

If you decide that you would like to cycle there and discover it, you can. Trust me, I work in the area for 15 years. People of public sometimes go there just to see the studios or tv stations. There is many subjects inside the area.

So, I undestand that it seems to be accessible only for customers or workers, but it is accessible for anyone and the only limitations are for cars.
Eino81 (2026-02-21 21:02:44+00:00): OK, I trust you :) I will check it within some weeks (I have other biking plans for tomorrow...).
simacekjakub (2026-02-21 21:19:36+00:00): I know it looks a bit sketchy to go around the lift barriers, you can just also walk your bike on the sidewalk around the gates and then freely cycle anywhere you want. There is person the the entrance, but they're not there to check who goes in and out. It's just security staff watching around.

So I would put the customers tag just on the gates maybe and only for cars. The rest should be not restricted according to me. There is one additional restriction behind TV Nova building, that's for employees only, but also for cars, pedestrians can freely go there, but that's already done in the map.

Enjoy the ride :)
NeisBot (2026-02-20 08:51:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 17 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/769051109 v2 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/769051087 v3 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/769051102 v4 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7178999977 v2
https://osm.org/node/7179009195 v2
https://osm.org/node/7179009232 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178808326