piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
HellMap (2024-02-02 17:13:05+00:00): Lūdzu beidz redaktorā spiest fix/upgrade pogu, ja tu neesi uzmanīgi paskatījies, ko tieši tu "labo". Tas, ka redaktors rāda paziņojumu nenozīmē, ka tā ir vienmēr kļūda.

Tas nav seamark  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/763125934

Ar layer elementu pārklāšanos automātiski nelabo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116239212 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/770603329 Kā iepriekš minēts, tādā veidā tu tikai noslēp reālo problēmu, nevis reāli kaut ko izlabo.

Šādās vietās noexit=no neliek https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11237573474

Šis bija marked crossing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9003554752

building=roof nav automātiski jāliek layer=1, ja tas ne ar vienu citu elementu nekonfliktē
richlv (2024-02-02 21:41:49+00:00): Iespējams, par šādām izmaiņām vērts apspriesties OSM Latvijas kopienas čatā https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
iD redaktors tiešām ar saviem ieteikumiem pārāk bieži samulsina lietotājus.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-06 09:50:09+00:00): Hello!

What
addr:housename=1041
addr:housenumber=16036
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264247480/history is supposed to express?
Pooh01 (2024-06-03 08:52:24+00:00): Relacja Dekanat Frysztak jest duplikatem relacji 17082738
WieKo68 (2024-06-10 11:51:52+00:00): poprawiono
woodpeck (2024-02-09 14:58:08+00:00): Dear Petey007, please specify a more detailed changeset than "course work", for example: "tracing features of XY golf course from aerial imagery" or so. Please also, for anything that is not visible on aerial imagery, specify the data source you are using, and satisfy yourself that this is actually a data source you are allowed to use and not something that is copyrighted. For example, in this changeset you labeled hole #1 and added par=4; we need to know where that information comes from. Use the "source" field to document your sources in future changeset uploads.
MxxCon (2024-02-04 06:38:42+00:00): Why would you create a building and then tag all of its metadata as a separate node? Why is the building itself not tagged with all that data?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146925528
rhtb0 (2024-02-01 16:52:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146942949
계속 지웁니다 어떻게 해야 할까요?
다시 돌리면 계속 지울것 같습니다.
빠때리 (2024-02-02 13:42:43+00:00): 더이상 군사지역이 아닌 곳에 군사지역 태그가 달려서 그렇습니다. 그냥 노지에요
rhtb0 (2024-02-02 13:45:02+00:00): 그냥 빈땅인건 알지만 렌더러 기준으로 편집하면 안됩니다.
rhtb0 (2024-02-02 13:46:28+00:00): OSM에서는 속성 효력이 없어지더라도 형태가 남아있는 경우 수명주기 머릿말(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:Lifecycle_prefix)을 쓰도록 되어 있어서 abandoned 태그를 적용하면 군사지역 태그가 무의미해집니다.
rhtb0 (2024-02-02 13:49:31+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:%EB%A0%8C%EB%8D%94%EB%9F%AC%EC%97%90_%EA%B1%B0%EC%A7%93%EB%A7%90%ED%95%98%EA%B8%B0
이 문서를 참고하시기 바랍니다.
Glassman (2024-02-02 23:01:06+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146926436
CurlingMan13 (2024-02-01 21:53:56+00:00): These changesets have all been reverted since they don't exist.  You should only map things that actually exist on OSM.

Do not add things that do not exist.  Further action will result in referral to the Data Working Group and potential failure on your class assignment.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146963416
Xvtn (2024-02-06 15:11:10+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Everything looks great to me, no complaints. Thanks for your contributions!
desertivy (2024-02-01 14:14:44+00:00): Hello StrzeleckiDesert,

Most of the highway=residential you added are alleys (too small for a car to access), therefore it should be mapped as:
highway=service
service=alley

Regards.
StrzeleckiDesert (2024-02-09 19:26:14+00:00): Thank you for reaching out about your concerns and reclassifying the ways to highway=service and service=alley. I will keep this feedback in mind going forward. Happy Mapping!
Glassman (2024-02-02 23:04:58+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146926801
felipeeugenio (2024-02-01 02:00:16+00:00): Hola.
Gracias por sus ediciones.
Estábamos observando las ediciones y la verdad es que nos preocupa la cantidad de errores y lo rebuscado las soluciones.
Además borró informaciones relevantes y agregó duplicados de básicamente todo. Además de usar varios tags de manera incorrecta, solo por mencionar algunos de los errores que notamos.

Le pedimos por favor indicarnos qué está intentando hacer, para ver cómo lo podemos ayudar.
Saludos
felipeeugenio (2024-02-01 17:36:25+00:00): No hay respuesta del mapero y revisado todas sus ediciones, nunca ha dado respuesta. Se procede a reversar ediciones defectuosas y subestándar
John Adams of Chile (2024-03-18 19:15:17+00:00): Hola, el asunto es el siguiente, el penal de Punta Peuco corresponde solo a la parte sur de lo que se indicaba, el resto corresponde a lo que antiguamente se llamaba SENAME, incluyendo las canchas que salen al norte, los presos no tienen acceso a estas.
felipeeugenio (2024-03-18 20:04:43+00:00): Hola. No es un tema de qué hay ahí, Si le creemos. es cómo ejecuta los cambios, que son bastante deficientes. Vemos que está editando otra vez en la zona. Esperaremos a que termine para ver como normalizar la situación.

Saludos
Glassman (2024-02-02 23:04:22+00:00): Question - the building is labeled as a warehouse, but the operator is The Merc Playhouse. Is it a warehouse?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146926905
kucai (2025-01-31 23:45:37+00:00): Kalau ikutkan kamera bing streetside kat simpang traffic light nun, nama jalan ni jalan tok kenali.
Glassman (2024-02-02 23:03:04+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146926930
Glassman (2024-02-02 23:02:44+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146926954
CurlingMan13 (2024-02-01 21:53:57+00:00): These changesets have all been reverted since they don't exist.  You should only map things that actually exist on OSM.

Do not add things that do not exist.  Further action will result in referral to the Data Working Group and potential failure on your class assignment.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146963416
Ewen Hill (2024-02-01 02:26:28+00:00): Nice work Ham!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146927106
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 07:26:20+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146927264
Warin61 (2024-02-01 21:29:52+00:00): Relation 3766951 has stop in wrong order. I have removed the stop from the relation.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-02-01 13:52:17+00:00): Please stop the vandalism. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146927959
LLAQWA (2024-04-27 14:32:00+00:00): Hola, 
el edifisio en el sur oeste es una antena con propio tag...
saludos
Glassman (2024-02-02 23:06:00+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146928553
Glassman (2024-02-02 23:13:04+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Buildings should not be drawn over footways. The problem may be caused by the angle of the aerial imagery or the footway may go through the building. If the later, a building passage needs to be added. Can you reduce this addition? Let me know if you need help
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146928597
Glassman (2024-02-02 23:06:22+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146928654
Glassman (2024-02-02 23:06:34+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146928740
Glassman (2024-02-02 23:06:48+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146928758
Glassman (2024-02-02 23:16:06+00:00): #TIP: square building by selecting the outline then just type a "q" - also try to follow the roof outline - where sometimes you have to guess the shape when hidden by trees.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146928822
recrayon (2024-08-18 06:52:42+00:00): names and shaped of added buildings are fixed in changeset 155398686
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2024-02-29 11:47:00+00:00): أستاذ وليد هذه خريطة عامة وليست مكانا لتخزين اماكنك المفضلة والخاصة، نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن عشوائية للخريطة
simo_explorer (2024-02-02 12:02:21+00:00): Good morning mountainvalleytreeservices,
many tags you entered are badly written, could you check?
please read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like
thanks for collaboration
Allison P (2024-02-02 17:58:58+00:00): Nope, SEO spam. There is no office here and you will not get a reply. I have deleted.
Glassman (2024-02-02 23:09:29+00:00): Typically the large polygon around the area would be tagged as landuse=retail. We usually tag the roof structure over the pumps as building=roof + layer=1 + amenity=fuel. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146929567
phoenixsaigon1698 (2025-01-06 16:57:21+00:00): Sao các way_id trong này car và streetview thể hiện car đi được mà bên em đặt car=destination hết vậy?
Glassman (2024-02-02 23:07:42+00:00): You can skip the address of parking lots if they serve a building with an address
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146929745
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 07:21:08+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146929789
Glassman (2024-02-02 23:02:26+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: square the building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146930309
julcnx (2024-02-01 11:51:12+00:00): Hi there! Thank you for your contributions! Just a friendly tip for next time, it's a good practice to save and upload your changes before moving on to the next area, even in the same country. You can find more information on changesets and their geographical size at: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146930376
Glassman (2024-02-02 23:17:26+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146930712
Glassman (2024-02-02 23:17:22+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146930748
Glassman (2024-02-02 23:19:31+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146930748
Glassman (2024-02-02 23:19:25+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146930777
Glassman (2024-02-02 23:19:06+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146930818
arjunaraoc (2024-02-02 10:31:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my improvement: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146979078
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146930877
Glassman (2024-02-02 23:18:51+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146930958
Lezurex (2024-02-02 23:17:31+00:00): Hallo mhochm!

Willkommen auf OpenStreetMap und vielen Dank für deinen ersten Beitrag!

Ich habe mir deine Änderungen angeschaut und mir sind zwei Kleinigkeiten aufgefallen.

- Bei der URL scheint sich ein Tippfehler eingeschlichen zu haben. Zudem sollten URLs im entsprechenden Schema sein (http(s)://).
- Ist das Büro tatsächlich 24/7 offen? Hier geht es um die physische Öffnungszeit vor Ort, nicht allfällige Supportöffnungszeiten. Je nachdem bitte prüfen und ggf. nachtragen.

Ersteres habe ich dir schon korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147003889

Happy Mapping,
Lenny aka Lezurex
mhochm (2024-02-11 19:52:28+00:00): Hi Lenny

Danke für den URL Fix!
Wir sind natürlich net 24/7 offen, danke fürs rausnehmen.

Beste Grüsse
Glassman (2024-02-02 23:18:24+00:00): We don't use descriptive names in OSM. The tags should be sufficient. If there is a sign saying Tennis Court then it is okay to name them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146931190
Langlaeufer (2024-04-24 12:26:16+00:00): Hallo Salix,

"Am Wallhof" kann nicht gleichzeitig Fahrradstraße und verkehrsberuhigt sein. Was gilt hier derzeit (genaues Verkehrszeichen), dann kann ich dir beim Tagging behilflich sein.

Grüße
Langläufer
salix01 (2024-04-24 12:59:03+00:00): Es ist nur Fahradstraße ohne weitere Beschilderung (244.1). Das Wiki fand ich uneindeutig, daher habe ich die alte Klassifizierung living street belassen.
salix01 (2024-04-24 13:02:01+00:00): Ach ja - und KFZ frei/ sidewalk=both
Fizzie-DWG (2024-02-04 01:11:58+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15658
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-01 09:39:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146938137 where the changeset comment is: revert von Edits einer Person mit OSM-Hausverbot
Hufkratzer (2024-02-01 21:12:23+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1245169140 seems to be a riding arena. Riding arenas are usually tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, like here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539015359#map=18/41.74568/12.77533&layers=P or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539015360#map=18/41.74935/12.77786&layers=P
Glassman (2024-02-02 23:21:24+00:00): Instead of drawing an area for the business, just add a node to the existing building. Can you remove the duplicate building?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146932099
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-22 11:29:20+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146932573
nevw (2024-02-01 07:41:17+00:00): You need to place Bob's Prestige Lawnmowing business over the building he operates from instead of over the lawn he mows.
It it is his home then add office=company also to the point you place there.
HikeAndMap (2024-02-01 21:30:24+00:00): Hi thanks for fixing this one. Back then I wasn't sure according to the data privacy act if we're allowed to add personal private names to commercial establishments. Now I know we are allowed for commercial.

Thanks for fixing this
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146932746
mirikaaa (2024-02-02 15:32:33+00:00): Hi! I've corrected this title as ***** looked rather spammy and in no way informative this poi works. If I'm still wrong, no problem to correct me).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146932746
HikeAndMap (2024-02-01 21:27:20+00:00): Hi thanks for the contribution. The ***** stands for a personal private name part of the company. Back then I wasn't sure if we are allowed to add that information due to the data privacy act. The real correction is not to remove the **** but to add a fixme something is missing here) In this case since I live here I know it's Oto Mike..

I'll do that then and correct that - now I know for commercial establishments we are allowed to add the full personal private names

thank you and please keep helping OSM :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146932759
mirikaaa (2024-02-02 15:34:32+00:00): Hi! I just thought it would look more appropriate and informative this way. But don't worry about correcting me!)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146932759
arjunaraoc (2024-02-02 10:34:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my improvement: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146979201
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146932807
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-01 07:10:14+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11575830041
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11575830042

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
AndersAndersson (2024-02-01 17:29:32+00:00): Hej!
Är detta en jordbruksväg eller är det ett skoterspår? Det ser ut på Lantmäteriets topografiska karta som att den passerar en myr.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/577250676
AntonBengtsberg (2024-02-01 17:47:25+00:00): Hej!
Troligen så är det en gammal vinterväg och ingen ”riktig väg”. Skoterleden var fel inritad där så jag ändrade den.
AndersAndersson (2024-02-01 22:04:05+00:00): Ok, tackar!
BaghdadiMapper (2024-02-03 12:10:54+00:00): Thanks for your edit, although Lamassu has re-added the Persian name in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146957111

and in the discussion he has repeatedly failed to provide on-ground evidence for those names instead only citing unofficial sources. Later, another user (ChehrehBargi) in the changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147010459

 also added a non-existent Turkish name and changed the Persian name to a different non-existent name, further proving that those names don't exist on the ground as they can't agree on one name.
EneaSuper (2024-02-01 12:46:46+00:00): Ciao, secondo me il tagging più idoneo è il seguente:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:artwork_type%3Dsculpture
camminatoreseriale (2024-02-01 15:01:00+00:00): Mi pare un’ottima idea 👍🏻
MxxCon (2024-02-06 08:25:05+00:00): Hello.
Is the phone number of this hotel remained the same?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146934604
Iván Caparrós (2024-02-07 07:41:46+00:00): Hi.

According to its current website, it is still the same (+1 212-973-2400).
emarv (2025-10-27 11:54:26+00:00): Hi! Why were the following relations deleted as part of this change?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1757638
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1757766
ciclista (2024-02-04 18:59:33+00:00): Vorsicht, H&M war schon als POI gemappt.
Bitte nicht nochmal am Gebäudeumriss erfassen.
ciclista (2024-02-04 19:08:43+00:00): Habs's korrigiert
#147065812
simo_explorer (2024-02-02 09:20:00+00:00): Good morning happybeats,
many tags you entered are badly written, could you check?
thanks for collaboration
Rainero (2024-03-07 20:19:01+00:00): Hallo Neb the B,
diese Fläche https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1245190513#map=19/49.44186/10.94162 und weitere in diesem Änderungssatz sind doch eher Gärten als unkultivierte Grasflächen. Zu natural=grassland siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:natural=grassland?uselang=de .

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
Neb the B (2024-03-08 08:08:05+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Habe ich angepasst.
Liebe Grüße
aceman444 (2026-03-13 22:12:31+00:00): Zdravim, odkial pochadza takyto nazov? Na stranke si nikde to "by Corwin" neuvadzaju. Ze to Corwin SK, a.s. prenajima je druha vec.
Luzandro (2024-02-01 11:08:19+00:00): Hallo,

achte bitte darauf, dass sich die unmittelbare Wohnumgebung nicht über die halbe Welt erstreckt

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Änderungssatz#Räumliche_Ausdehnung_von_Änderungssätzen
map per (2024-02-01 19:43:20+00:00): Wegen review_requested: Ansonsten sieht die Änderung gut aus
arjunaraoc (2024-02-02 10:58:08+00:00): Please upload your edits in a small area as a separate changset to facilitate review.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146936396
Hufkratzer (2024-02-01 20:53:07+00:00): Hi,
This object seems to be a building. Therefore it should be tagged as a building (e.g. building=yes, building=stable or whatever). Otherwise it will not be rendered as a building on maps.

The tag leisure=horse_riding should not be used for a specific building of a riding centre, but for the riding centre as a whole, as in 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515295027#map=18/41.59546/20.67327&layers=P and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7310645719#map=19/42.69120/21.11865&layers=P

See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
os-emmer (2024-02-01 17:28:37+00:00): Hallo maze2p0,
du scheinst hier den THW Ortsverband Neunkirchen neu erfasst zu haben. Was genau hast du hier ergänzt/geändert? Warum hast du die Informationen aus dem alten Element (siehe Version #8 im Link unten) nicht vollständig übernommen?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208907749/history
houtari (2024-02-05 05:08:29+00:00): Tulitkohan luoneeksi tuonne nyt duplikaattikahvilan (sekä rakennuksella että erillisellä noodilla on nyt amenity=cafe), vai onko siellä oikeasti kaksi kahvilaa?
liljaadeliina (2024-11-20 08:40:55+00:00): Taisin luoda vahingossa duplikaatin.
literan (2024-02-01 17:15:01+00:00): не надо, пожалуйста, лес рисовать поверх зданий. Аккуратнее, торопиться некуда.