piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
os-emmer (2025-04-05 19:54:00+00:00): Here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12673259049
I have the same question as here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163881590
Taya_S (2026-01-15 08:24:44+00:00): Reverted as vandalism/import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177248701
Yunan973 (2025-03-20 20:25:08+00:00): Bonjour,

un numéro siret ne change jamais même quand une entreprise fait faillite et n'existe plus ou est en liquidation.
Si besoin, d'autres attributs, par exemple description, peuvent être utilisés.
z11120 (2025-03-21 11:49:36+00:00): Merci, mais 'complete-tes-commerces' refusait ce siret parce qu'en liquidation.
LaniusCollurio (2025-04-28 08:51:20+00:00): Buongiorno i dati su toponimi e numeri civici della Provincia di Biella derivano in gran parte dagli open data della Provincia stessa. In particolare derivano dallo Stradario Provinciale redatto negli anni con la collaborazione di Comuni. Le strade a cui avete attribuito un toponimo fittizio sono senza nome, i nomi delle Frazioni sono legati alla località e ai numeri civici ma non alla strada. Siete pertanto pregati di correggere togliendo le modifiche fatte
KKS (2025-03-17 21:02:11+00:00): З ідеально синхронізованих ліній ти зробив тяп-ляп редагування і воно тепер кострубате
riwnodennyk (2025-03-23 12:13:14+00:00): Дякую що відкотив 😊 Підкажи будь ласка що мається на увазі "синхронізоване" - так як це перевірити?
Nzau (2025-07-25 19:27:48+00:00): Salut lubulu111,
Pour ce chemin, motor_vehicle=agricultural suffit. 
Ce tag permet de dire "pour les véhicules motorisés, seuls les véhicules agricoles sont autorisés".

Cela n'implique donc rien pour les vélos, par défaut, ils sont donc autorisés dans les deux sens ^^

Au plaisir d'en discuter,
Enzo
lubulu111 (2025-07-25 20:32:50+00:00): Bonjour Nzau ! :-)
Comme il y a un panneau sens interdit sauf cycliste et sauf desserte agricole, j'ai pensé que "vélo = designated" était approprié. 
Ce que je comprend de ton message, c'est le statut de la voie (chemin rural ? ) qui implique que le vélo est de fait autorisé ? Mais le statut de la voie, on ne le voit pas sur le terrain. Ça pourrait être une voie communale. Il faut consulter fantoir ?
Merci de ton aide.
C'est cool.
Nzau (2025-07-25 20:54:35+00:00): "vélo = designated" est vraiment dédié aux routes conçues pour les vélos (comme les voies vertes). 

Pour les autres highway (hors 4 voies), bicycle=yes est implicite. Cela signifie que par défaut, les vélos sont autorisés, il n'est donc pas nécessaire de le repréciser de nouveau.

Dans OSM, le type de voie est défini par plusieurs critères, ici on aura unclassified puisque : 
"La valeur unclassified de la clé highway est utilisée pour représenter une route publique au trafic le plus faible." 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway=unclassified?uselang=fr
 
Ce qui correspond bien à la réalité du terrain.

Maintenant pour les restrictions d'accès. Si on avait mis "access=no", alors cela signifie que la route est inaccessible pour tous et qu'importe le moyen de locomotion. 
Donc pour faire dans la finesse, il vaut mieux mettre des clé=valeur qui restreigne uniquement les modes de déplacement concernés (donc les véhicules à moteurs).

Ducoup, dans les gps type Géovélo, il va agir comme d'habitude puisqu'il n'y a aucune restriction pour les vélos dans les 2 sens ^^

J'espère être un peu clair, sinon au plaisir d'en discuter de vive voix :-)
KKS (2025-03-17 21:00:13+00:00): Нотатки створюються в нотатках, а не в самих даних ОСМ
riwnodennyk (2025-03-23 12:17:23+00:00): привіт! тут ніби написано що в фіксмі можна писати текст https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fixme?uselang=uk Що найкраще писати в фіксмі?
jleedev (2025-03-17 15:29:06+00:00): https://osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
KKS (2025-03-17 20:57:23+00:00): Дорога не будується зараз, а планувалась будуватись і проводились підготовчі роботи.
riwnodennyk (2025-03-23 12:20:12+00:00): Привіт! Дякую що відкотив 😉 Коли був там - бачив що будувалась. Який буде найкращий статус поставити для дороги яка на стадії ведення підготовчих робіт? Хіба "highway	track" це буде підходяще? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack
somehundred (2025-03-17 16:57:13+00:00): Instead of deleting the node you could have marked this place as disused. Or change it to shop=vacant. This way it would not show up in the map but the node and history would still be accessible. People would know what was here in the past.
NeisBot (2025-03-17 15:33:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
remedial8562 (2025-03-17 15:42:04+00:00): Okay, I've changed it
NeisReview (2025-03-17 18:14:19+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/163738105
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 03:05:02+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164573389
AndresDuhour (2025-12-26 14:07:21+00:00): Hola! le voy a colocar este nombre como descripción. Si conocés el nombre de la calle se puede agregar después. Saludos!
aceman444 (2025-03-18 09:55:47+00:00): Dakujem za uzavretie poznamky, zrejme som na to zabudol, hoci som doktora pridal.
Dakujem za doplnenie firmy, ale treba ju presunut asi do znacky 'operator', lebo znacka 'company' urcuje typ firmy (co robi), pozrite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:company . Pripadne keby ste vedeli zistit otvaracie/ordinacne hodiny.
Fifco1 (2025-03-18 17:44:40+00:00): Ďakujem za upozornenie, opravil som to. S otváracími hodinami si nie som istý, pretože na ecasenka.sk sú napísané otváracie hodiny na stredu 7 - 12h a inde 7 - 15,30h, ostatné dni sú všade rovnako.
A67-A67 (2025-03-17 16:15:15+00:00): Bedankt voor het verwijderen van de winkel. Het adres is echter niet verdwenen. Ik heb deze hersteld. 

De correcte manier om een winkel te verwijderen is om de tags die betrekking hebben op de winkel te verwijderen en het adres te laten staan.
DwarfNebula_ (2025-03-17 16:47:36+00:00): Ahh, excuus. Ik kon de naam etc niet aanpassen, dus dacht ik verwijder het helemaal.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-19 10:25:47+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163810370
pwbriggs (2025-03-23 16:39:55+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for the contribution. I noticed that you removed the cuisine=mexican tag from "Los Tinos Mexican Restaurant". Was this unintentional, or is it a different restaurant now?
user_22641166 (2025-03-28 12:10:46+00:00): Hey @pwbriggs, that was unintentional! Not really sure how to undo that - I joined and made the change in Taginrya mostly as a proof of concept for a friend who was trying to find ways to help their friends who Speak Taginrya to be able to use maps since it isn't supported with a number of Google Maps features.
pwbriggs (2025-03-29 03:51:23+00:00): No problem! It looks like the Los Tinos restaurant is actually closed, and has since been removed from the map. OpenStreetMap can be confusing at first, but feel free to reach out to local mappers if you ever need help. Thanks again!
aceman444 (2025-03-18 09:49:22+00:00): Da sa pridat aj facebookova stranka (z poznamky) ako 'contact:facebook=..'. Do znacky 'website' treba davat aj protokol, takze 'http://gabri.sk' .
Dakujem.
Fifco1 (2025-03-18 16:46:38+00:00): Ďakujem za upozornenie, upravil som to.
DaveF (2025-03-18 20:54:56+00:00): Why is this station now wheelchair=no?
isi17 (2025-03-24 14:35:09+00:00): Hi DaveF, 

this change was created by one of our Wheelmap.org users. Since we can not check this entry, please change it in case this is false. 

Thank you 
Wheelmap - Team
DaveF (2025-03-24 15:26:05+00:00): Your anonymous privileges should be rescinded.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 00:25:24+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164656521
literan (2025-03-17 20:16:29+00:00): bicycle=no тоже, думаю, надо поставить
LaniusCollurio (2025-04-28 08:50:53+00:00): Buongiorno i dati su toponimi e numeri civici della Provincia di Biella derivano in gran parte dagli open data della Provincia stessa. In particolare derivano dallo Stradario Provinciale redatto negli anni con la collaborazione di Comuni. Le strade a cui avete attribuito un toponimo fittizio sono senza nome, i nomi delle Frazioni sono legati alla località e ai numeri civici ma non alla strada. Siete pertanto pregati di correggere togliendo le modifiche fatte
Andrea Musuruane (2025-05-16 12:33:56+00:00): Fatto revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166348990
user_5359 (2025-03-18 15:27:39+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1362549242. What is the meaning of the tag C16 = C15?
Loyba10 (2025-03-18 15:53:10+00:00): Oh! Thank you so much for pointing that out, I corrected it. I might have placed that tag by accident (that tag does not exist).
Soshal Distan Singh (2025-03-18 02:26:48+00:00): Добрый день.

Дублировать адреса на магазинах и прочих точках интереса внутри зданий с уже проставленным адресом необходимости нет, просто не заполняйте это поле.

Заодно выключите моментальную отправку изменений на сервер в настройках StreetComplete, а то вы регулярно то ставите тег, то убираете, не можете определиться (например: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9895941928/history).
dpolovinkin (2025-03-23 05:53:45+00:00): hi Andi, wanted to ask - can you please write meaningful comments about what's done instead of "update" as it has 0 info for other mappers and it's kinda not allowed :) but if you have so many changesets I guess you know this already?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

thx!
andi9876 (2025-03-23 16:48:22+00:00): Hi.
Ok.
dpolovinkin (2025-03-23 16:59:28+00:00): thx! :)
antimundo (2025-03-30 23:16:40+00:00): El propio ayuntamiento usa el nombre de barrio de La Luna: https://www.rivasciudad.es/evento/participacion-ciudadana/2023/09/07/fiestas-del-barrio-de-la-luna/862600213326/

Además el nombre por el que es popularmente conocido es como barrio de La Luna, además muchos negocios tienen nombres como "Farmacia la Luna" o existe la "asociación vecinal la luna" y el "huerto municipal urbano la luna". A todas luces "barrio de la luna" es como se le conoce a este lugar.

El Cristo de Rivas se le conoce a la zona de la ermita en la carretera de Mejorada del Campo.
fsdafdfd (2025-05-09 09:34:50+00:00): Efectivamente, aunque no se ha aprobado nunca como nombre oficial y no aparece en ninguna documentación, el propio Ayuntamiento lo utiliza aunque sin dejar claro exactamente a qué zona se refiere, porque en ocasiones se confunde incluso con La Fortuna. Se ha cambiado nuevamente a La Luna, como estaba originalmente.
antimundo (2025-05-14 10:36:14+00:00): Sin duda, creo que existe una ambiguedad con dónde acaba el "Cristo de Rivas", y dónde comienza el "Barrio de La Luna".

Ciertamente sería algo que estaría muy bien que aclarase el ayuntamiento, cuando te respondí a esta cuestión, investigué a ver si había una frontera definida, y no he encontrado respuesta en ninguna web del ayuntamiento de Rivas.
fsdafdfd (2025-05-14 10:57:34+00:00): Según Jarama (que es propietaria del 99% del suelo de la zona, y ha construido la mayoría de viviendas) el nombre oficial  de todo el sector es Cristo de Rivas, y Barrio de la Luna es un nombre que dio el Ayuntamiento a la zona para promocionar en su momento las promociones de la EMV en el bulevar de la C/ Madres de la Plaza de Mayo. Quizá una solución mas equilibrada sería colocar "Barrio de la Luna" sobre la rotonda de Av/Tierra con Av/8 de Marzo (pues desde luego esa zona es conocida por todos como Barrio de La Luna) y poner un nuevo "Cristo de Rivas" sobre la Av/Democracia que es a lo que siempre se ha llamado "Carretera del Cristo de Rivas" es decir, la M-823.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-16 04:28:22+00:00): DWG revert - Incorrect, undiscussed Organised editing from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166330713
maro21 (2025-03-17 20:40:57+00:00): W takich przypadkach nie usuwamy węzła, tylko oznaczamy przedrostkiem "disused:" albo "was:": https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10822505674/history
Albo zmieniamy tag sklepu na shop=vacant, gdy po poprzednim nie ma już śladu.
To pozwala zachować historię obiektu i niektóre tagi [np. dostęp dla wózków inwalidzkich].
b-jazz (2025-03-19 06:54:34+00:00): Hi Zach, why are you creating a multipolygon out of two lines (typically most of the fairway on one line and then a short chunk of line that completes the fairway for the other?) Is there something I'm missing? I don't see any use for a multipolygon in that situation.
 For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1368431473
aceman444 (2025-03-18 14:27:21+00:00): Otvaracie hodiny na 2 cislice prosim, takze 08:00 .
Fifco1 (2025-03-18 16:46:11+00:00): Ďakujem za upozornenie, opravil som to.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-20 03:52:03+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17421
NeisReview (2025-03-17 18:39:14+00:00): #DataImport #DeletionCheck

Hi, welcome to OSM!

With this and your latest changesets, you've added a significant number of features that appear to share similarities in their tags. Could you please let us know more about the source of your mapping activity? Is this a data import?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks!
PubUpdater (2025-03-20 16:38:59+00:00): This changeset deleted  The Oliver Plunkett pub (node 4340326599). As far as I can tell that pub is still open. Is there another reason it was deleted?
Glassman (2025-03-19 00:41:04+00:00): You might want to check out the wiki on how to add a slipway. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dslipway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163741319
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-19 11:04:27+00:00): This changeset left 2 roads disconnected.
Please make sure to resolve warnings like impossible oneway before uploading.
You can zoom to the issue by clicking the error.
Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163811782
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-19 10:25:48+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163810370
hoserab (2025-03-17 23:34:56+00:00): I have added the turn restriction you added a fixme note for, plus the pre-existing left-turn restriction from 8th Ave onto Danloe which is only in effect from 7:00-8:30 am, Monday to Friday. (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163753894)

You seem like a very adept mapper; FYI an explanation of conditional turn restrictions can be found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions

Happy mapping :)
NeisBot (2025-03-17 17:24:42+00:00): Hi Freddy123, and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

Over the past 7 days, you've made more than 100 changesets without adding any comment.

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment
gurglypipe (2025-03-17 23:28:02+00:00): Heya, thanks for adding detail to the farmland here. From the aerial imagery, it looks like a lot of this is unimproved grazing land (and I’d expect that of the area) — if so, it could be more specifically tagged as landuse=meadow meadow=pasture.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Gurglypipe/landuse for the current consensus on farmland tagging in NW England.

Hope that helps, happy to answer questions about if it it’s not clear, or if you have improvements to recommend.
Infinatum (2025-03-18 08:25:45+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for the message, yes I would agree on the land being mostly for unimproved grazing. So I'll definitely look at adding those tags.

I'll have a look through that wiki page.
gurglypipe (2025-03-18 09:08:49+00:00): Super, let me know if you have any questions.

One other thing which comes to mind if you’re going to be adding significant amounts of geometry (like this) is that you probably want to enable the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels overlay (in the Background Settings on the right) and ensure the aerial imagery is aligned to it before starting to add stuff, using the Imagery Offset settings further down that panel.

It looks like the alignment offset for Bing imagery here is 0,0, which is handy. But in other areas of the northwest it can be out by 1-2m. The offset of the aerial imagery changes every few years it’s updated, and it varies between different areas (even between neighbouring villages). The OSMUK Cadastral Parcels come from the Land Registry and are a source of ground truth for alignment (and also help with property boundaries where aerial imagery is unclear).

Hope that makes sense :)
Infinatum (2025-03-18 17:08:45+00:00): Thanks again for your advice.  Not used the "OSMUK Cadastral Parcels",  That will make it easier to spot land offset. 
Made some change (see changeset 163783773)

Seems some of the land is used for growing grass for hay.  though the fields seem to change over time, switching between grass lands and pastures. 

For now i just marked  some of the field as crop=grass and made the field a single area so it can be easily changed to meadow. 

Having a few fields as farmland shows that there is a mix use in the area. (that the way i see it).

Going to make a few more tweaks to this area, noticed that allot of trees have been planted so may need to survey the area.
KKS (2025-03-17 20:54:29+00:00): Члени зв'язку мають бути з роллю.
Виправи
riwnodennyk (2025-03-17 22:12:02+00:00): О, дякую що помітив, оновив )
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163742667
Fraxi (2025-03-17 17:50:01+00:00): Сверено и с Bing Streetside...
Bienson (2025-03-17 21:34:07+00:00): Hi,

building=house ist aber weiterhin am Gebäude eingetragen.
Nekoatthegates (2025-03-18 18:52:18+00:00): Correction: Source used was Bing Streetside; ESRI World Imagery.
wolfbert (2025-04-06 08:23:33+00:00): Hallo, ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29366636 wirklich eine Wohnstraße? Falls ja, bitte maxspeed/source:maxspeed löschen und traffic_sign setzen, danke.
eggie (2025-03-17 18:32:02+00:00): Welkom bij OSM 

Het is net allemaal correct aangepast en nu weer een zee van accesstags die niet valide zijn.
Zie commentaar op deze changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163733929
Wat is de bedoeling?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-17 18:34:22+00:00): Nog een tip.. Je hoeft geen accesstags toe te voegen aan wegen die al 'default' zijn.
MVG
eggie
LeadingLogistics (2025-03-17 20:49:13+00:00): De gehele situatie is zo:

Je rijd vanaf de veerweg met de auto de vier heultjes op, en je kan de gehele vier heultjes met de auto bereiken, zowel de grote lange dwarse straat als al de inhammetjes. Letterlijk de gehele vier heultjes is gewoon een straat
eggie (2025-03-17 20:58:25+00:00): Oke, maar dan is het nu gewoon goed getagd.
Al die accesstags ook eerst conflicterend heb ik verwijderd.
Alleen als een verkeersdeelnemer er niet mag komen voegen we een tag toe.
motor_vehicle=yes e.d hoeft dus niet. 

Ik zal je nog per PB ons welkomstbericht sturen met nuttige tips.

Omdat de dwarsstraten Eigen Terrein zijn heb ik daar access=permissive toegevoegd. Dat routeert ook gewoon in OSM. 

Bedankt voor je reactie. 

eggie
DD1GJ (2025-03-18 11:34:24+00:00): Hallo Fox 68,

willkommen bei OSM. Ich habe Deine Änderungen zurückgesetzt, weil Du versehentlich zwei andere Punkte verschoben hattest, wovon Straßen und Wege betroffen waren. Siehe obige Warnungen und https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=163744254

Zudem ist OSM kein Portal für Stammtische oder Treffen aller Art. Für Anfahrtsbeschreibungen genügt es, dass das Split eingetragen ist. Für eine Anfahrtskarte kannst Du z.B. folgenden Link verwenden

https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=49.89212&mlon=8.83880#map=15/49.89490/8.84032

Weitere Informationen zu osm findest Du im Tutorial:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

vy73, Joachim, A03
DD1GJ (2025-03-18 11:36:52+00:00): Richtiger Kartenlink:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=49.89212&mlon=8.83880#map=15/49.89827/8.83964
SafwatHalaby (2025-03-19 10:59:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM :)

Optionally, you might want to consider adding `incline=up` or `incline=down` to the steps. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:incline
NeisReview (2025-03-17 18:26:47+00:00): #NameChanges

Hi, welcome to OSM.

In the past 12 hours, you have made numerous name changes across various changesets. This included modifying names as well as removing other name:*. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.

You can find an overview of the recent changesets at the following link: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=21816964
sbilonog7 (2025-03-17 20:38:45+00:00): In this case, old name is провулок Дехтяря. New name is провулок Дігтяря and in English: Dihtiaria Lane
Document, item 91: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eZTx7_FYBAvz_Y9hXsX6NMRZA9lKQVmV/view?usp=sharing.

You need document for every change?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 03:05:03+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164573389
ilias_ (2025-03-17 22:54:10+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue! Vous avez ajouté les informations du restaurant à l'immeuble en entier, alors que ce n'est qu'un resto au rez de chaussée. Dans ce cas là il ne faut pas changer l'immeuble, il faut simplement ajouter un point par dessus et y mettre les infos du resto. Merci de votre contribution!
NeisReview (2025-03-18 07:14:35+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
NeisReview (2025-03-28 20:25:49+00:00): #farmland #game ?
MaliMrav (2025-06-12 13:50:24+00:00): This change is going to be reverted, because it looks like the author was just fooling around, or playing some game that involves map.
NeisReview (2025-03-18 07:17:55+00:00): #HighwayChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

In this changeset, some types of highway are being added or modified by you. 

Could we know the sources that you used? Thank you.

More information about the changeset: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163744970
AndresPA1601 (2025-03-19 14:51:54+00:00): Hi, besides there is a city urban planning plan of Santa Cruz de la Sierra there are not clarifications of the type of road, just basic beacuse of the division of neighborhoods. Despite this, I consider I am able to better categorize these roads because I live in Santa Cruz and I saw the evolution and the urban changes with in the city.