piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
John Kastner (2024-11-13 23:45:25+00:00): Is adding `bicycle=use_sidepath` correct here? IIRC, it's should only be used when cycling on the road is not permitted, but I don't think that's the case for any of DC's cycletracks
CurlingMan13 (2024-11-14 03:14:40+00:00): Changeset reverted.  We use access tags to denote private property. 
 You can read more here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159113792
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-09 11:48:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549222170/history - have you wanted to add barrier=wall ?
silversurfer83 (2024-11-14 06:34:52+00:00): Moin

hast du mal mit dem user gesprochen, dessen Arbeit du da entfernt hast? Kommentarlos ist das nämlich maximal frustierend für ihn sowie nicht besonders hilfreich. Solltest du nämlich recht haben mit deinem Ansatz sollte hier doch jemand noch daraus lernen können, oder?

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159109009
pyrog (2024-11-29 12:16:53+00:00): Bonjour Jean-Ray,

Tu écris "de plus le type de voie n'est pas "Solide goudronné" mais graviers compacté."

Ceci ce tag justement highway=track + tracktype=grade2

Les guerres d'éditions ne sont pas trop tolérées dans OSM ;)
Les "discussions" dans le tag note non plus. Les commentaires de changeset ou les discussions dans le changeset comme ici sont plus adaptés.
Je te laisse rectifier.

Cordialement,
Yves

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173140450/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173140450/history
Glassman (2024-11-14 21:00:42+00:00): I think you want the tags ownership=private and access=private. I usually only use the access tag if a no trespassing sign there. Also - we spell out street names in OSM. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159110385
NieWnen (2024-11-14 00:32:08+00:00): Ta ścieżka rowerowa też powinna mieć access=no? To w sumie to dość ważne połączenie rowerowe :)
Anas masuris (2024-11-14 08:43:24+00:00): Niestety nie wiem, czy ścieżka jest dostępna. Może ktoś bardziej zapoznany z tematem się wypowie
JezCrow (2024-11-16 00:30:04+00:00): Hi Iwerne, welcome to OpenStreetMap! I just wanted to check whether you have permission to copy that information into OSM. I know that postcodes (but not addresses) from Royal Mail are OK, but don't know about Bristol's Pinpoint map. It looks like Bristol Council do have a lot of open datasets, but I cannot see one relating to addresses.

If you do not have permission, there other sources available online which are allowed to be used e.g. out-of copyright OS maps. Although an on-the-ground survey is always best if you can!

Happy mapping,
Jez
fortera_au (2024-11-14 00:21:42+00:00): Hi, just wondering what street level imagery you used to confirm this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159111184
rarad74 (2024-11-14 07:32:15+00:00): Salut. Multumesc. Am si uitat de el. Am vazut ca e lipsa traseul cand am fost la Sibiu prin august.
Stian Cristian (2024-11-14 09:16:32+00:00): Salut! Nu este problema. Oricum imi ieseam din mana daca nu mai trasam o ruta de autobuz.
Glassman (2024-11-14 21:04:46+00:00): Isn't the name "Brettler Family Place" instead of "Bretttler family Solid gound" Can you verify and correct as needed. - I'll send you more info on OSM in a message
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159111239
seattlefyi (2024-11-14 19:26:36+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM, and thanks for the name and foot path addition. Would suggest first not making the building into a circle, and perhaps double-checking spelling. If you make changes in the editor and they don't look correct, you can refresh the browser and reset things -- please don't upload errors. I'll undo this change (and the next similar one), and will re-add some of the tags added.
mariotomo (2024-12-02 04:55:16+00:00): Please remember that your changeset comments will remain in the database for as long as the project lives; don't use them to vent anger at software or at your fellow mappers
Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
seattlefyi (2024-11-14 19:40:25+00:00): Hi, also please don't copy information from Google Maps, we're not allowed to do that in OSM.
SomeoneElse (2024-11-15 01:46:29+00:00): Hello,

The changeset comment here suggests that you might be having a bit of an issue with bus relations not showing up (somewhere?) and "Fuck this fucking shit. I'm going to fucking delete all the fucking bus routes on this fucking site!!!!" elsewhere suggests a certain amount of frustration with (something)?

What might help is to ask your question over at the forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/uk/86 and explain a bit about what the issue is - there are 6 maps at osm.org and lots elsewhere, and they all update at different speeds.

Best Regards,
Andy
LuxuryCoop (2024-11-14 11:04:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159125069
행정구역 관계 수정했습니다!
frozenrabi (2024-11-27 09:52:27+00:00): Please use proper OSM tags. The tag for forest is natural= wood and not forest=wood. Thank you!
DUGA (2025-02-11 23:32:22+00:00): Wrong maxheight, also no need to cut segment

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1333614781#map=19/39.781808/-77.734046
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:37:26+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165095325
McCarte (2024-11-19 00:25:18+00:00): Michelle this is a duplication of an existing path, so should be removed?
mueschel (2024-11-16 14:13:10+00:00): Hi,
you're using the tag "step_contrast" here. The documented spelling of this tag is "step:contrast":
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Astep%3Acontrast

Could you change that?
RainbowWave (2024-11-16 17:09:11+00:00): Sure, thanks for the heads-up.  It should be easy to fix in my next edit.
wireguy (2024-11-14 10:52:04+00:00): Hey TG! Welcome to OSM.  Good job adding addresses to the area.  Quick tip, press the Q key when you have the building selected, and it will square the corners of the building and make it look nicer.   Keep mapping!  -WG
Necessarycoot72 (2024-11-14 03:12:14+00:00): Changeset note is wrong. I replaced the geometry with newer 2024 tiger lines data.
Lumikeiju (2024-11-15 19:48:39+00:00): Hi! I see that you requested a review of this changeset - I've verified using the King County iMap that the address point you deleted is indeed no longer associated with this location, so everything looks good!

Thanks for your contribution, and happy mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:02:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
user_3022894 (2024-11-14 14:23:53+00:00): Hallo Roland,

ich habe deinen Gedankengang auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:D%C3%BCsseldorf/Stammtisch zur Bürgersteig-Erfassung gelesen. Finde ich gut. Genaue Bürgersteig-Erfassung (die gute Daten liefert) ist in der Tat sehr aufwendig, aber die sidewalk=*-Tags zu erfassen ist auf jeden Fall ein Anfang.
LG Lukas
drolbr (2024-11-18 06:04:32+00:00): Danke für die Ermunterung!
LG Roland
RedSkies (2024-11-14 15:03:05+00:00): User has been told to stop modifying abandoned railways by moderators and refuses to listen

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159133998
CurlingMan13 (2024-11-14 21:51:33+00:00): As I had commented before, only features that currently exist should be mapped.  Features that no longer exist should not be mapped on OSM, and should instead be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMap).  I tried to engage previously, but was met with hostility and antagonism (referring to your profile page).

You have reverted changesets nilly-willy, without checking that the features removed were actually overbuilt and replaced.  And in the process of your careless reverts, you have removed many valid additions, including new railways, new buildings, landuses, etc.

Again, I can't stress this enough, OSM is only for what *currently* exists and can be verified, not for what once exists.  I have asked you to stop adding (or readding) features that no longer exist and have been built over/replaced and to cease the hasty deletion/reverts of new features that have been verified.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nonexistent_features

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=Do%20not%20map%20objects%20if%20they%20do%20not%20exist%20currently
nevw (2024-11-15 09:59:12+00:00): Hi, you created an invalid wood multipolgon. Outer rings cannot join each other. I changed it to a simple polygon for the whole area as there appeared to be no differentiating tags to keep as three sections. If you still want them as separate areas then use three simple polygons which can share sides.
ms_disstro (2024-11-16 02:30:39+00:00): Hi, thanks for the correction. I will follow your advice and keep things simple from now on.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-09-28 18:21:20+00:00): 已在 osm.org/changeset/172579488 中全部回退所有编辑

OSM不是测试场，这里只应存在真实数据并且你的编辑会被所有人共享，在这里搞测试是非常不负责任的行为
Glassman (2024-11-14 21:13:45+00:00): Burgermaster was already tagged. When adding a business, besides the name, add tags to describe the business, such as amenity=fast_food. I would recommend removing the building name tag since a node is already existing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159116430
syntex (2025-01-30 16:03:51+00:00): I changed the class and access tags of this road - this is not really a motorway link, more like an unofficial connector.
Glassman (2024-11-14 21:14:04+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159116493
Glassman (2024-11-14 21:14:35+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good but try to match the roof outline better
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159116516
Glassman (2024-11-14 21:14:58+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159116599
Glassman (2024-11-14 21:17:56+00:00): Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dfuneral_directors for how to map funeral homes and funeral directors shops.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159116718
BCNorwich (2024-11-14 08:21:07+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've corrected a few street names for you. 

The house numbers don't seem right, several are duplicated. Could you please correct these?  

Regards Bernard.
eggie (2024-11-14 07:08:28+00:00): Dag Dijkstraat,
Wanneer bedrijven sluiten blijft altijd het adres achter. Helaas verwijder je nu de adresnodes. Het adres is dan niet meer vindbaar in OSM.
Svp de adresnodes herstellen.
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=159117386

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-11-14 07:22:46+00:00): Hier heb ik de adresnodes al hersteld
Aadish Garg (2024-11-14 12:53:39+00:00): Great edits!
pehyff (2025-01-06 21:36:08+00:00): Die Änderungen an dem Gebäude Karl-Marx-Platz 6 und den umliegenden Gebäuden entsprechen nicht der Realität. Ich bitte, sich mit mir in Verbindung zu setzen, ich wohne hier und habe Bauzeichnungen und Luftaufnahmen, die eine Rücknahme der Änderungen nahelegen.
Ropino (2025-01-07 08:40:39+00:00): Frohes Neues Jahr!
Da ich nur den Tag "addr:place" entfernt habe, verstehe ich nicht was dies mit Luftaufnahmen und Bauzeichnungen zu tun haben könnte.
addr:street war/ist vorhanden und eine passende Straße ebenfalls. Daher machte das addr:place für mich schlicht keinen Sinn.
Peter Brodersen (2024-11-26 02:08:06+00:00): Hejdu!

Er der en grund til, at du fjerner navne fra veje som fx
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/257114755/history
?
osmviborg (2024-11-26 06:35:39+00:00): Vejen findes ikke i det officielle vejregister. Det er faktisk gældende for de fleste af vejene  på campingpladsen, hvis det overhovedet kan kaldes veje. Hvor har du navnet fra?
Peter Brodersen (2024-11-26 06:42:00+00:00): Jeg har ikke tilføjet navnet i første omgang. Men hvis du ikke har oplysninger fra lokale om, at de ikke anerkender det navn, så skal du ikke fjerne det, jf. wikien:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
"Common or official usage, especially for a feature in the natural environment"
Bemærk "Common".

Her går du aktivt ind og fjerner et vej, tilsyneladende uden nogen lokalviden for området for, om det er det, beboerne kalder vejen for eller ej. Det er hærværk, og det skal du holde op med uden lokal viden.
osmviborg (2024-11-26 06:59:00+00:00): Fint med mig. Gider du undlade at lave mekaniske redigeringer når du vedligeholder dit projekt om vejnavne? Det tager lang tid at kontrollere dine og andres bidrag til dit projekt, men vær venlig at gøre det. Allerede nu er projektet fejlbehæftet pga. manglende kontrol. Jeg rører det ikke mere.
cuzi (2024-11-20 10:46:18+00:00): Se souberes a area de uma escola, é melhor desenhar a area em vez de um unico ponto. Desenha a area em volta de todo o campus e edifícios.
Wanderer2000 (2024-11-14 08:08:20+00:00): Ik heb deze wijziging teruggedraaid. De naam van deze weg is nog steeds de Waarbekenweg. De naam van de tunnel stond al getagd met tunnel:name

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159119448
eggie (2024-11-14 09:11:59+00:00): Dag Leo  Lijkt me oke...

Van andere VR mappers heb ik begrepen dat er toch emergency=yes nodig zou zijn op een bollard.
Ik heb geen idee. Het zou eigenlijk default moeten zijn in LiveNav.
foldable impliceert emergency is yes?  Geen idee. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-11-14 08:02:23+00:00): Dag scanacar   motor_vehicle=private heb ik van de Laat verwijderd. Dat is toch openbare weg.
motor_vehicle=yes lijkt me ook niet correct. Je zet het voetgangersgebied gwoon open voor alle reguliere verkeer.
Er staan hier al conditionaltags
delivery @ (07:00-11:00)
Wat is het probleem hier. 
Staat het gebied dan wel open voor regulier verkeer en waarom dan nog de conditional tags voor delivery ?
MVG
eggie
mavl (2024-11-14 15:03:30+00:00): Здравствуйте. Это пакет правок добавляет название для вокзала "Железнодорожный вокзал". "Железнодорожный вокзал" - это не название, а описание. Железнодорожный вокзал обозначается тегом building=train_station.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
osmviborg (2024-11-15 06:52:07+00:00): Undlad venligst at fylde 'landuse' ind lang motorvejen mod Horsens, der er gang i en større vejudvidelse. https://www.vejdirektoratet.dk/projekt/e45-vejle-skanderborg
kortgodt (2024-11-15 07:28:59+00:00): Jeg har grupperet to skovmassiver under samme relation (Dalskov) Skovens udstrækning langs E45 har jeg ikke rørt ved.
osmviborg (2024-11-15 07:47:55+00:00): 👍
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-14 08:20:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12337911081
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/823971694

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
infeeeee (2024-11-15 13:38:20+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Szerkesztéseid jók, látom több ortofotó alapján is dolgozol. Elvileg a FÖMI a legpontosabb, ha kérdéses, akkor ahhoz igazítsd az újabb felvételeket. Ilyen meredek hegyoldalakban nagy eltérések lehetnek köztük.

Írod hogy GPS mint forrás, van valami pontosabb eszközöd, vagy csak hagyományos, telefonba épített?

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
pife (2024-11-15 14:14:12+00:00): Szia, köszönöm. Több orto-t is néztem, de nem tudom melyik a legpontosabb illesztésű ezen a környéken, de ezek itt nem nagyon segítettek. GNSS: Garmin Fenix 7x Sapphire Solar óra, multiband + multi freq (L1+L5) üzemmódban, a felmérés miatt nem karlengetve, hanem vízszintesen tartva. Plusz rengetegszer jártam erre, Strava heatmap alapján is láttam a konstans eltéréseket. 

A Facebookon nem vagyok fent, a többiről nem tudtam, megnézem a többit, köszi, kérdezni is akartam.

Első szerkesztésként megijedtem, mert a tile-ok random frissültek be, akár azonos zoom fokozaton is. Hogy a régit látom balra, az újat meg jobbra, miközben egy másik zoomon meg még a régit látom, ijesztő volt, hogy valamit elrontottam.
infeeeee (2024-11-15 15:47:24+00:00): Ctrl+shift+R-rel újratölti az összes csempét, ami már újragenerálódott szerkesztésed után. Pár perc kell neki. Ha benyomod a rétegeknél, hogy térképadatok, akkor mindig az aktuális elemeket emeli ki, az vektoros adat, csak lassú.

Ha sokat szerkesztesz majd, akkor megéri megtanulni a JOSM-et, bonyolultabb dolgokat könnyebb ott, meg nagyon sok hasznos eszköz van benne, ami a böngészőben futó iD-ben nincs.

Matrixon van talán a legaktívabb közösség, ott kaphatsz leggyorsabban választ ha kérdésed lenne, olvasni lehet regisztráció nélkül is. Én is csak ott vagyok meg a levlistán, facebook az ebben a közegben nem a leggyakoribb.
pife (2024-11-15 15:58:28+00:00): ctrl-shift-R, szuper! Köszi.
Nem tudom, JOSM volt, vagy más, mindenesetre elakadtam anno sok-sok éve egy külső editorral, de most láttam, hogy van webes alap editor, és végre megcsináltam két módosítást, amit anno nem tudtam.
Így is volt pár funkció, amit használtam volna, nem nem volt, pl. a property (vagy mi) átmásolása, vagy amikor egy útba + turistaútba linkelt pontot kellett volna eltávolítani vagy szétszedni a kapcsolatot, új helyre rakni, de azt nem mertem megtenni.
mavl (2024-11-14 15:03:44+00:00): Здравствуйте. Департаменты вместо amenity=townhall лучше обозначать office=government.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:office
Piskvor (2024-11-14 09:24:04+00:00): Dobrý den, tady došlo k nějaké změně místního značení? Pokud se nemýlím, od Průhonic po Chodov je to silnice pro motorová vozidla, kde je maximum 110 - nevšiml jsem si, že by tam někdy v poslední době přibyly značky dovolující 130.
Zdeněk Černý (2024-11-14 10:56:37+00:00): Dobrý den, máte pravdu. Moje chyba a nepozornost. Je nějaká možnost, jak celou sadu změn vrátit zpět nebo je nutné úsek po úseku proklikat?
Piskvor (2024-11-14 11:03:30+00:00): Dobrý den, to se stává, nevadí: editovat se má odvážně :) takovou změnu lze opravit snadno, už jsem to vrátil v https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159124971 - není třeba to klikat ručně.

Mapování zdar,
Piškvor
Zdeněk Černý (2024-11-14 12:18:00+00:00): Děkuji.
gurglypipe (2024-11-14 12:12:13+00:00): Heya, thanks for adding houses and other detail around Natland, it’s nice to see the map becoming more complete round here.

One thing — the aerial imagery around Natland is offset from ground truth by about -0.97,-1.04 metres, so please adjust the imagery before starting to edit. You can do this with the ‘Imagery Offset’ settings under ‘Background Settings’ on the right.

The aim is to align the aerial imagery to the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels overlay. This is needed because aerial imagery is only very roughly aligned by the supplier, and its relative alignment changes every time it’s updated, and changes across the country. Some places are several metres out of alignment compared to ground truth. So when editing map geometry it’s important to align the imagery before starting.

There’s more information about this on the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Align_aerial_imagery_before_tracing) but I’m also happy to answer questions if you have any

Happy editing :)
gurglypipe (2024-11-14 12:12:32+00:00): I’ve fixed the alignment of houses on Smithy Close in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159127696
AndiBing (2024-11-18 14:50:47+00:00): Thanks. and thanks :-)  Appreciate that.
gurglypipe (2024-11-18 14:53:16+00:00): No problem. Sorry for all the technical detail — imagery alignment is unfortunately a necessary evil when adding a lot of geometry on the map.
canfe (2024-11-14 17:05:06+00:00): access=no vuol dire che non ci può accedere nessuno.
Hai letto la wiki prima di usare tale tag?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159121083
whb (2026-04-04 09:16:47+00:00): Guten Tag,

dies ist keine Fahrradabstellanlage, sondern ein 40-Fuß-Container:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1333681689/history

Viele Grüße
whb
soemisch (2026-05-04 06:32:26+00:00): Hallo whb, danke für Deinen Hinweis. Ich habe den Container gelöscht.
Viele Grüße, Lars
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-14 09:11:11+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3216485969
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1333682295

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Piotr Strębski (2024-11-14 09:30:48+00:00): poprawione, dzięki!
NorthCrab (2024-11-14 12:11:02+00:00): Ja też dziękuję :-)!
Filip009 (2024-11-15 10:19:28+00:00): Zdravím, akou značkou je táto cyklotrasa značená https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18285686?
Kovoschiz (2024-11-14 11:08:08+00:00): This is already has `building=museum` . It's the problem of whatever you are looking at. You are duplicating the `=museum` with the perimeter. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/99148524
aTarom (2024-11-14 18:52:13+00:00): Hi, where do you get the elevation value from? to fix the wrong value "16063" at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12338979053/history
Cheers
aTarom (2024-11-14 19:00:55+00:00): plus this
"ele"="16154" at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1950004254/history
eggie (2024-11-14 09:40:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Probeer winkelinfo te combineren met de BAG adresnode
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
LockOnGuy (2024-11-14 16:31:30+00:00): Hello OmarHakim, and welcome to OSM! please write a changeset comment that do describe your edit instead of typing your name, this way other mappers will understand and know what your edit is. Thank you!
OmarHakim (2024-11-14 23:14:32+00:00): لقد اضفت علامة  مجمع سكني على موقع المجمع على الخرطة تحديدا
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-14 09:50:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/733100079

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 02:53:44+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165051817
AlvaroRC (2024-11-23 10:41:24+00:00): Hola Pablo,
Encantado de ver que estás editando en esta zona. 
Tengo una pregunta. ¿Podrías explicarme que has hecho en esta edición?
Un saludo
FvGordon (2024-11-16 21:49:32+00:00): Hi, with this changeset you have uploaded a lot of duplicate areas on a golf site. Can you please remove the duplicate ones. (check with JOSM validator)
FvGordon (2024-11-28 20:50:53+00:00): I have removed the duplicate golf areas.
eggie (2024-11-14 14:15:17+00:00): Dag Floris.. Je vraagt feedback. Lijkt me oke zo.
MVG
eggie
Rafał Niewiński (2024-11-14 10:22:46+00:00): Reverted (The altered road types resulted in an inaccurate hierarchy to the real world.)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159123682