piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-27 13:10:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9287925821
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9287925820
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243450850
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243435453

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mavl (2024-02-23 18:52:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147818131, 147828921 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
ma908690 (2024-09-06 07:29:30+00:00): Way: 新瑶池海鲜综合市场(瑶池西街小区东) (1243453398)
bad name?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-27 13:40:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243455497

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-27 14:10:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243460826

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Kai Johnson (2024-03-06 14:07:29+00:00): Substantial portions of this relation include former highway alignments that haven't existed for more than 50 years. Does it really still belong in OSM?
ZeLonewolf (2024-03-06 14:44:36+00:00): Which of the 1200 relations are you referring to?
Kai Johnson (2024-03-06 15:06:31+00:00): Ah! Sorry! I didn't see how big that changesets was. This one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8534013
ZeLonewolf (2024-03-07 13:02:11+00:00): Might need to be tagged as a historic route. I'm not sure what the on the ground situation is
Kai Johnson (2024-03-21 23:52:40+00:00): Sorry it took me a while to get back to this. I'm interested in the things in the super relation for the historic alignments of US 80 that are no longer roads.

relation(8534013);
(._; >>;) -> .old80;
way.old80[!highway];
out count;
way.old80["abandoned:highway"];
out count;

The actual historic route is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9712655. This other stuff looks like it belongs on OHM.
felipeeugenio (2024-01-27 14:29:31+00:00): Hola. Buenos días. por favor cuidado con estas ediciones. Arrastró una intersección varias cuadras. Ya lo arreglé.
saludos
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-27 14:30:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227707634
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227707635

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
saupinpin (2024-01-27 15:05:34+00:00): correction identifiant en ref : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146747485
zorun (2024-04-01 13:39:54+00:00): Bonjour,

Votre import est fait en ajoutant le tag source=survey, hors ce n'est visiblement pas le cas puisque c'est un import automatisé.

J'ai trouvé plusieurs cas où la donnée ne correspond pas au terrain :

- un seul bac dans la donnée alors qu'il y en a 2 sur le terrain
- bac dans la donnée alors qu'il n'y a rien sur le terrain (devant un immeuble neuf avec encore des travaux en cours)

Ce n'est pas grave en soi, le terrain est toujours la meilleure source, mais le tag donne l'impression que la donnée a été vérifiée alors que ce n'est pas le cas. Je vous suggère de remplacer le tag source=survey par source="Nantes Métropole" et ajouter source:date=YYYY-MM-JJ (date de production de la donnée source)

Avez-vous bien lu cette page ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Import

Bonne journée,
zorun
saupinpin (2024-04-01 13:59:45+00:00): Bonjour,
merci pour le message et les infos!

Avant de me lancer j'avais demandé de l'aide ici, ce qui m'a conduit à tagger de la sorte, même si visiblement il n'y a pas de consensus sur tout 😃
https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/points-de-collecte-dechets-alimentaires-biodechet/20025

Sinon effectivement en pratique les emplacements et le nombre de conteneurs semblent changer régulièrement, ajouter la date me semble une bonne idée !
mavl (2024-02-23 18:52:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147818131, 147828921 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
GanderPL (2024-06-27 21:24:22+00:00): Informacje opisowe, takie jak wygląd czy materiał, z którego wykonano obiekt, powinny być umieszczane w tagu description
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146746964
user_3022894 (2024-11-13 22:46:38+00:00): Hi,

danke, den Tag kannte ich noch nicht!
LG
Lukas aka Elefant
GanderPL (2024-06-27 21:25:12+00:00): Informacje opisowe, takie jak wygląd czy materiał, z którego wykonano obiekt, powinny być umieszczane w tagu description
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146747295
söm4324 (2024-01-27 20:13:33+00:00): Hi Danfost, 
bei den Öffnungszeiten soll die führende 0 immer mitgeschrieben werden, wenn die Stundenzahl einstellig ist.  Auch Angaben zu den fehlenden Tagen (Sonntag und Feiertag) sind hilfreich. Hab beides aber schon angepasst.
https://osm.org/node/3375734996

p.s. Es gibt da auch ein prima Tool für die Öffnungszeiten:
https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/
Ist sehr hilfreich, wenn's mal komplizierter wird.

Viele Grüße!
GanderPL (2024-06-27 21:26:03+00:00): Informacje opisowe, takie jak wygląd czy materiał, z którego wykonano obiekt, powinny być umieszczane w tagu description
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146747415
wireguy (2024-01-28 17:51:25+00:00): Ratrun, can you review this change? It appears to have deleted a section of us 40 and also the relation 140774 (unclosed boundary Bates City relation).  Thx.
ratrun (2024-01-28 18:25:39+00:00): Hi, I only connected  unconnected segments. The deletion of the segments you mentioned was done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146722280.
wireguy (2024-01-28 18:43:55+00:00): ok  when you connected us 40, you didn't connect it fully.   The josm validator would show the error.
GanderPL (2024-06-27 21:26:28+00:00): Informacje opisowe, powinny być umieszczane w tagu description
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146747550
gscholz (2024-02-08 07:47:10+00:00): Hi fondolucy,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines and displaced ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=36.12220&lat=-0.67376&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146747664

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
GanderPL (2024-06-27 21:26:50+00:00): Informacje opisowe, powinny być umieszczane w tagu description
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146747665
Polarbear (2024-08-17 17:06:31+00:00): Hallo Zkwosch, 
du hast von diesem Objekt innerhalb einer Minute 6 Versionen hochgeladen. Bei anderen ist das ähnlich. 
Das belastet unnötig das Datenvolumen. Lassen sich die Änderungen nicht in einem CS zusammenfassen?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/502456553/history
Zkwosch (2024-08-17 18:06:05+00:00): Hallo Polarbear,
von welchem Datenvolumen sprichst du?
Wie du vielleicht siehst, habe ich die Änderungen mittels StreetComplete vor Ort vorgenommen.
Dem Änderungssatz können wir entnehmen, dass die App einige Änderungen gleicher Art zusammengefasst hat.
Ich achte bereits darauf, möglichst gebündelt meine Änderungen hochzuladen. In diesem Fall hier sind es 28 Änderungen! Wie StreetComplete diese aber ordnet, entzieht sich meinem Einfluss, soweit ich weiß.
Wenn du mir sagst, wo ich das einstellen kann, werde ich gerne den Versuch machen.
Grüße
Zkwosch
Polarbear (2024-08-21 19:35:45+00:00): Wenn du ein Objekt änderst, wird eine neue Version zusätzlich zu allen vorherigen gespeichert. Wenn du also ein Objekt 6x änderst, versechsfachst du den Speicherbedarf.
Besser ist also, alle Änderungen z.B. zum Bäcker auf einmal zu machen, hochzuladen und dann zum nächsten Laden zu gehen. 
Wenn StreetComplete das genau anders herum macht, ist das ein Bug, den es zu ergründen gilt. 
Ich benutze es aber selbst bisher nicht.
Zkwosch (2024-08-21 20:00:25+00:00): Danke für deine Hinweise.
Ich verstehe, was du meinst.
Unter einem Bug würde ich das nicht einordnen. Eher geht es um die Art und Weise, wie mit vielen Änderungen umzugehen ist.
Nichtsdestotrotz bin ich mir sicher, dass die Entwickler froh sind, wenn du ihnen den Bug meldest.
Denke, das geht hier: https://github.com/streetcomplete/streetcomplete
Vielen Dank!
GanderPL (2024-06-27 21:27:01+00:00): Informacje opisowe, powinny być umieszczane w tagu description
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146747791
GanderPL (2024-06-27 21:29:16+00:00): Informacje opisowe powinny być umieszczane w tagu "description", a inskrypcja w "inscription".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146748029
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2024-01-31 19:49:49+00:00): هذه الخريطة عامة وأرجوا منك عدم إدخال أماكنك الشخصية والعشوائية إلى الخريطة
george1201 (2024-01-27 19:23:47+00:00): Frsuenalber?
maro21 (2024-02-10 16:50:20+00:00): Sama zmiana jest w porządku, tylko proszę nie łączyć mechanicznej edycji z poprawianiem czegokolwiek innego w jednym zestawie zmian.
pavvv (2024-02-10 17:03:51+00:00): spk, poprawiłem od razu bo overpass wychwycił, a review request to był missclick
vasony (2024-01-28 11:09:37+00:00): Szia!

Milyen forrásban van Munkácsi téri az y-os írásmód helyett?

Itt csak Munkácsy téri székhelyre hivatkoznak, ha ez ugyanaz:
https://lachazaiskola.hu/munkatarsaink-munkacsy/

Tamás
vasony (2024-04-07 13:00:24+00:00): Válasz hiányában visszajavítottam.
dcf77 (2025-07-06 07:34:43+00:00): Szia Tamás!
Bocsánat, hogy csak 1 év után válaszolok.
Általában az SZMSZ szerint szoktam kitölteni az iskolák adatait. Most utánakerestem, hogy miért írhattam át, de semmi indokát nem látom, valóban mindenhol y-al írják. Nem értem, hogy miért módosítottam a jót rosszra.
Köszönöm, hogy visszaírtad a helyesre!
pyram (2024-02-01 18:29:48+00:00): Hallo Neb the B,
schön, dass Du die Daten pflegst.
Leider hat es aber einen Nachteil, wenn man die Gebäude, die auf den Luftbildern noch ersichtlich sind löscht: Die werden gelegentlich wieder neu erfasst. Besser ist daher ein "Prefix" zu nutzen ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:removed:* ). Dann verschwindet das Objekt von der Karte, wird aber von den Editoren noch gezeigt.
Schönes Beispiel gleich nebenan: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97854169/history

Gruß
pyram
Neb the B (2024-02-02 19:08:40+00:00): Hallo pyram,

danke für den Hinweis. Werde ich zukünftig genau so machen.

Liebe Grüße
BaghdadiMapper (2024-01-27 17:40:21+00:00): The user that behind changeset 146748334 (Lamassu) has completely removed the known name of the street and the ones that locals actually use and replaced it with an unknown name that was only recently approved by the government and is named after a person on the international terror list. He did this without prior discussion and then proceeded go to the OSM Telegram group and say that LockOnGuy is an American citizen and that the new name is widely used (both are dishonest untrue statements). The new name should be put into the official_name column as it’s rarely used and unknown by the locals and was only put by the PMF as a politically charged move.
LockOnGuy (2024-01-27 17:47:15+00:00): Thank you, in this changeset I restored ‘name’ tag to the one known and used. Regards.
BaghdadiMapper (2024-01-27 17:58:22+00:00): Note that this is not meant to come out as a personal attack against Lamassu as he’s an active contributor in Iraq but his edit was driven by a political agenda and go against the wiki guidelines by removing the widely known name and replacing it with an obscure one.
LockOnGuy (2024-01-27 18:03:25+00:00): Indeed, and unfortunately true. I really hope for the best.
ChehrehBargi (2024-01-31 10:44:28+00:00): Hello
According to OSM rules, if the name of a street is written on the board, we cannot remove it for reasons or political taste. Anyway, in one of the name tags, the words on the board should be recorded.
In addition, we all know that Abu Mahdi Al-Muhandis was a general who rose up to fight against the DA'ESH terrorist group and sacrificed his life for his country, Iraq.
If you say in Wikipedia that he was a terrorist, we all know that Wikipedia is not impartial in political matters.
LockOnGuy (2024-01-31 13:47:09+00:00): ChehrehBargi,          
I request you to review the relevant documentation on the wiki, which explicitly states, "If an official name is more unwieldy or obscure than another name for the same feature and fewer people use it in practice, even if it is signposted, it is better to put the official name in official_name=* or alt_name=* than to treat it as the primary name."          
Additionally, it is important to note that the name in question has not been officially endorsed or displayed by the the people or the municipality; rather, it was erected by the Popular Mobilization Forces as a political statement. In the OpenStreetMap community, we aim to avoid incorporating political and problematic actions.          
It is imperative to highlight that the signage in question does not conform to the official regulations governing street signs in Iraq. As stipulated by the law, street signs within city limits are mandated to be white, aligning with the specifications outlined in the Vienna Convention on Road Traffic. Contrary to this requirement, the observed signage is colored blue, a designation typically reserved for motorways under legal protocols. Notably, this particular sign features an image of an individual, along with the emblem of the Popular Mobilization Forces, further compounding its deviation from the prescribed standards. Such non-compliance raises significant concerns about the accuracy and appropriateness of the information.               
Regards.
ChehrehBargi (2024-01-31 17:18:26+00:00): The wiki documentation does not contradict what I said. Have you polled that people use that name or do you have a problem with that name yourself? The sign that was recently installed here is an official sign, not a small or handwritten sign, and if it was not the official name, the municipality would have removed it. Why do you think Iraq is so chaotic that anyone can install whatever they want in the city? If a sign is installed on the street, it must be done with the permission of the municipality. But it seems that apart from the municipality, they should have asked permission from you too!! Meanwhile, OSM does not pursue political issues. In osm, we try to record every complication on the ground from whichever party we are.
At the same time, the writing on the board is not unfavorable or ambiguous. Unfavorability is your personal opinion.
ChehrehBargi (2024-01-31 17:22:51+00:00): The new name of the streets is used in the tag "name" and the old name in "old name", the local name is used in "loc name", and if the tag "name" is long, it can be tagged "short name".
LockOnGuy (2024-01-31 18:11:06+00:00): >Have you polled that people use that name or do you have a problem with that name yourself?                  
            
-The designated appellation is not utilized or recognized by the residents and locals in the area. This assertion is made based on a thorough understanding of the local context and insights derived from firsthand knowledge.            
________________            
">The sign that was recently installed here is an official sign"                
            
-May I request an image of the installation in question? Additionally, could you provide specific geographic coordinates to facilitate precise point location? Have you survey and saw it yourself? Concerning the term "official," clarification is sought regarding whether the municipality is responsible for this nomenclature. It is crucial to note that the PMU milita forces, being the entity behind the sign creation and installation, lack the legal mandate to officially designate street names or install signage.             
________________                    
">and if it was not the official name, the municipality would have removed it.            
>If a sign is installed on the street, it must be done with the permission of the municipality."                            
                        
-Regrettably, the municipality does not engage in the removal of such signs, contributing to the proliferation of numerous unofficial and often inaccurately named signage erected by residents. This includes instances where individuals affix handcrafted signs with descriptive names, such as "Street of Abu Example" or "Street of Martyr Example," contrary to the legal requirement for residential streets to be designated solely by numbers. Despite these deviations, it seems the municipality remains indifferent to such occurrences, even in cases involving hand-written signs executed with brushs.            
________________            
">Why do you think Iraq is so chaotic that anyone can install whatever they want in the city?"     
            
-I kindly request that you refrain from making assertions about my country without the depth of local understanding that I possess. I urge you to exercise respect and discretion in your comments.           
________________            
            
Ultimately, the act of affixing a personal sign to Airport Street, even if the municipality does not take measures to remove it, does not confer the legitimate authority to officially designate the street with my name on OSM. It is essential to exercise prudence and consider locations where one possesses local knowledge and a nuanced understanding of on-the-ground circumstances.                
            
Regards.
ChehrehBargi (2024-01-31 18:28:47+00:00): Definitely, in the future, the pictures of the target board will be added.
And as for the country of Iraq, I have done no disrespect to the people or the country of Iraq itself. I say that this country is definitely not an anarchy so that anyone can install something on the street.
When in reality there is a sign on the street level, then it should be recorded on the map.
You keep trying to sideline the discussion. Try to follow the osm wiki rules.
With respect to the people of Iraq
PaoloLombardi (2024-01-29 19:11:27+00:00): Buondì
Il percorso 1163652326 non risulta "designated". Nella realtà risulta una strada sterrata con accesso a tutti i veicoli a motore.
opendcc (2024-01-27 20:15:50+00:00): Hier ist kein Bauhof. Nochmal: bitte auf Changesetkommentare achten und Quellen angeben. So ist das Vandalismus!
SpinOff (2024-01-27 21:12:14+00:00): Hej. Węzeł amenity=parking dubluje obszar oznaczony tym samym tagiem. Poprawiłem już to.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146750112
Dodko (2024-01-28 11:03:45+00:00): Aký názov má pozemok, ktorej rodine patrí?
Na slovensku sa pomenovanie pozemku nezvykne používať.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:place%3Dplot
seattlefyi (2024-01-28 02:43:17+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits! 
First, I changed the generic “name” tag to match the “name:en” you added (your editor didn’t show you the (name in local language tag, it seemed.) Also, please save your changes before jumping a large distance between edits - helps to keep them local. Thanks again for editing!
mavl (2024-02-23 18:52:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147818131, 147828921 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
Uli Maier (2025-06-09 17:09:24+00:00): Warum  eingeragen?
Handelsregister Freiburg unter der Nummer HRA 601668 Löschung 04.01.2007
Wilhelm Maier KG. Eisenwaren, Inhaber Martin Maier e.K., Triberg im Schwarzwald (Hauptstr. 21, 78098 Triberg im Schwarzwald). Die Firma ist erloschen.
Dodko (2024-01-28 11:08:39+00:00): natural=grassland je pre neudržiavanú, prirodzenú trávu
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:natural%3Dgrassland

pre trávnik v obci popri ceste sa skôr hodí
landuse=grass
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:landuse%3Dgrass
aceman444 (2025-02-12 23:53:28+00:00): Ano.
A tie place=plot by asi mali byt oznacene lepsimi znackami, co na tych plochach je. Alebo nemusia existovat vobec. Dali ste to na par nahodnych ploch, ktore neviete lepsie identifikovat.
mavl (2024-02-23 18:52:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147818131, 147828921 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
SpinOff (2024-01-27 21:09:50+00:00): Hej. highway=residential tu nie pasuje, bo droga prowadzi tylko do kaplicy. Poprawiłem już ten teren jakby co
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146751881
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-17 02:30:51+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. The cycling guidance looks great. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146752696
BelKed (2024-04-30 22:08:25+00:00): Zdravím, kvôli čomu boli menené tagy na tejto ceste/chodníku? Mám taký pocit, že boli zmenené na nesprávne hodnoty. Napríklad motor_vehicle=private
alfred476 (2024-05-01 05:16:59+00:00): Zdravím,
je to lesná cesta, kde majú povolený vjazd vozidlá správy lesov a nie motorové vozidlá na požiadanie.
BelKed (2024-05-01 08:54:47+00:00): Potom je asi vhodnejšie použiť motor_vehicle=forestry. Private indikuje  súkromné príjazdové cesty.
A čo tá zmena highway z footway na track? Už to nie je chodník pre ľudí? Lebo sa mi nejako nezdá, že by sa tam niečo menilo, keď som to bol nedávno okuknúť…
mapperue (2024-05-01 12:28:19+00:00): Áno, je tam značka zákaz vjazdu motorových vozidiel s dodatkovou tabuľkou s povolením pre mestské lesy.
A to, že tam chodia ľudia nemení typ cesty. Stále je to lesná cesta aj podľa katastra.
NeisBot (2024-01-27 19:18:33+00:00): Hi Radio Castiao Jr, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong with your mapped motorway here? Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243511614