piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck (2024-06-21 09:29:48+00:00): I have now reverted all of Hendrikklaas's contributions in North America from the last couple of months because of complaints (deleting names from roads, mistakenly marking them as "paved" or changing them to driveways etc.); if the community would like to selectively re-instate these edits then I am willing to help but we'd need to find a consensus on how to proceed (ideally via the community forum).
txemt (2024-06-21 17:59:06+00:00): Thank you
Duja (2024-09-13 13:23:48+00:00): Uh, je li od tebe poteklo maxspeed:conditional=30 @ (Mo-Fr 07:00-21:00;PH off;SH off) ? 
Nije mi poznato takvo ograničenje...
Srdjan023 (2024-09-13 18:17:06+00:00): Веровано није пошто би то требало да представља зону школе, а за зону школе важи од 7:00 до 21:00 сваким даном и викендом и за време распуста. Тако да би требало да буде maxspeed:conditional=30 @ (Mo-Fr 07:00-21:00)
Srdjan023 (2024-09-13 18:17:41+00:00): На мапиларју ми се чини да и јесте ту зона школе али не могу да проверим
Duja (2024-09-15 18:03:07+00:00): Aha, to znači zona škole, zbunilo me... Tu jeste gimnazija, ali to i jeste skoro pa bulevar. Stanujem u blizini pa ću proveriti.
citrula (2024-06-07 22:24:22+00:00): Hello, did you mean to delete the name "Pfeiffer Ranch Estates" ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152393086
osmviborg (2024-06-08 06:13:12+00:00): tilføjet 'traffic_calming=bump'
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-08 07:26:03+00:00): Hi matty816, welcome to OSM!

I guess something went wrong with your name of the following new map element, correct?

https://osm.org/node/602513431
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-07 21:20:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11963440328
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11963440327
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11963440326
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101128646
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101133254
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101132759

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2024-06-15 12:01:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please use the correct tag for highways. Check the instructions, please.
Best regards
Bolt030 (2024-11-06 05:41:29+00:00): Morning!
I hope you are well! I see that you rather recently made some changes to the access of the area. I have received some feedback from some colleagues where due to the tag Motor Vehicles = Private that they are unable to route correctly to the destination due to the restriction. Do you perhaps know if access is indeed restricted for personal cars inside the area? I also see that there is some recent Mapillary, but the angle is not great :( 
Have a great day!
Kind Regards!
Rogoyski (2024-11-06 16:40:13+00:00): Hello! The access on this way was constantly set to private since the year 2013. What I did is I replaced the restriction to all forms of transport with a restriction only pertaining to vehicles, i.e. vehicle=private. I did it, because access for pedestrians is certainly not restricted, which I found out personally in the field. I did not check if there are signs restricting access to vehicles, so I kept the previous value of private.

We have this image from 2021 available:
https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=52.172418%7E20.973213&lvl=18.7&style=x&pi=-3.9&dir=339.4

It shows there is a living street, no gate when accessing the serviceway from Woronicza street and no restrictions (at least at this point). It is therefore likely the restriction for vehicles on the map is wrong. I will create a map note to have it checked out live.
Bolt030 (2024-11-07 05:09:02+00:00): Hey!
Thanks soooo much for the extra info! You have been great! I really appreciate your assistance!
Keep well!
Friendly_Ghost (2024-06-07 23:34:42+00:00): Thanks a lot for doing this cleanup
KiloThree (2024-06-08 03:54:20+00:00): Why mark the davis busway as permissive? It's authorised vehicles only
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152394069
jptolosa (2024-06-09 06:17:30+00:00): Hola, cuál es la razón para dividir este tramo del corredor Santa Rosa si se trata claramente de una sola calzada.
Saludos
CasGroenigen (2024-06-07 22:30:39+00:00): Not UK, but San Diego County
CasGroenigen (2024-06-07 22:30:50+00:00): Not UK, but San Diego County
MxxCon (2024-06-17 22:03:49+00:00): Hello.
Please note that any "_1", "_2", etc tags are always wrong to use. They should never be used.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names documents many different types of name tags you can use. Or if nothing there matches, you can simply add the name using the existing alt_name tag separating them with ;
This needs to be fixed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152395143
Frans S (2024-06-15 10:10:46+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please follow the guidelines of the highway taggings.
Traces connecting buildings with other roads are never tagged as a track. 
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152395375
söm4324 (2024-11-27 06:28:03+00:00): Hallo rene78,

ist der Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1264988479 wieder frei? Laut deinen Notizen soll er nur bis August gesperrt gewesen sein.
rene78 (2024-11-28 13:31:34+00:00): Hi söm,

komme leider erst wieder im Dezember nach FN. Da werde ich das mal kontrollieren. Der Radwegbau sollte mittlerweile aber auf alle Fälle abgeschlossen sein.

Ciao
Rene
literan (2024-06-08 10:20:39+00:00): вы поставили дубль такси. Оно уже есть на полигоне
rskedgell (2024-07-25 05:54:38+00:00): Unfortunately adding in incorrect access=yes tag to the Luton Dunstable Busway could have adverse effects on other data consumers. Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154376239
tyfi (2024-06-07 23:29:57+00:00): Looks like it was set to asphalt without checking the entire stretch for pavement. Part of it is indeed asphalt (part closer to US 183)
ma-rt-in (2024-06-20 17:10:24+00:00): Hallo,

kleiner Hinweis: Bitte nicht einfach löschen, sondern old_ref verwenden, dann bleibt es noch etwas erhalten und ist leichter nachvollziehbar.

vg
Martin
MxxCon (2024-06-17 22:18:44+00:00): In this edit too alt_name_1= and all the other tags you created are invalid. "_1" style tags should never be created.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152396924
MxxCon (2024-06-17 22:18:53+00:00): In this edit too alt_name_1= and all the other tags you created are invalid. "_1" style tags should never be created.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152396989
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-07-03 19:11:36+00:00): voce adicionou varios nós aqui, mas eles estão desconectados. por favor, revise
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-08-26 15:26:55+00:00): ??
CoyKoi (2024-06-10 01:57:55+00:00): Hi Sucl,
Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.
Can you please use more meaningful changeset comments - this helps make it clear what your intentions were with each changeset, for other contributors who can review your edits. Currently you are only entering 'Updated' which doesn't tell us much.
Cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152397253
akimapbuilder (2024-06-10 09:35:09+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since the waterbody you added overlaps with already existing waterbody.
KiloThree (2024-06-08 03:56:19+00:00): I'm confused how this is permissive, is it not busses only?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152397571
cs09736 (2024-07-30 02:01:40+00:00): Reverted due to use of nearmap.

See changeset 154585545.
Supaplex (2024-06-08 06:23:08+00:00): Hi,

你把兩個聚落變成圓型了，應該不是正確的吧?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152398165
KiloThree (2024-06-08 04:00:16+00:00): Please do not map buffered bike lanes as cycleways. This is removing data and degrading bicycle mapping and routing
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152398182
IvanGrishko (2024-06-08 04:11:29+00:00): Опечатка: частная и хоз.построки.
IvanGrishko (2024-06-08 04:14:45+00:00): Опечатка: частная и хоз.построки.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-08-24 03:24:29+00:00): Reverted by DWG - use of unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155678223
Frans S (2024-06-08 10:33:10+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You validated this task but left a few issues (duplicated buildings) unsolved.
You also not mapped overlooked buildings, both round and rectangular.
The road, north to south, could be adjusted to the footprint.
Best regards
ENGELBERT MODO (2024-06-08 17:22:08+00:00): Hi Fran s  okay, thanks for the feedback. I'll be more careful for the next validations.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 12:05:38+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11963764245/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-06-08 04:17:17+00:00): it is not on aerial and was added years ago
YYC-Pilot (2024-06-19 05:33:01+00:00): So do we not have to comment on what we have changed?
YYC-Pilot (2024-06-19 05:32:18+00:00): No comments again>?
YYC-Pilot (2024-06-19 05:31:40+00:00): I thought there should be a description of what has been done each edit?
rskedgell (2024-07-24 17:44:38+00:00): Mini-roundabouts (traversable centre, road marking per TSRGD diagram 1003.4) are tagged as nodes rather than as circular ways as routing software needs to be able to differentiate between them. I realise that it is tempting to re-map them so that they look better on the map, but it is incorrect and unhelpful to data consumers. Reverted.
rskedgell (2024-07-24 17:36:02+00:00): The whole point of the Luton Dunstable Busway is that general traffic is excluded, so access=yes would rather defeat the point. Reverted.
rskedgell (2024-07-24 17:28:32+00:00): Reverted and repaired. A section of road with clear "BUSES ONLY" road markings cannot be access=yes,.
YYC-Pilot (2024-06-19 05:29:21+00:00): How come there is no comment on this change?
akimapbuilder (2024-06-10 10:08:24+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since there is no building in sight.
akimapbuilder (2024-06-10 10:35:08+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since there is no road in sight.
akimapbuilder (2024-06-10 10:10:31+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since there is no waterbody in sight.
streckenkundler (2024-06-08 20:02:08+00:00): ...und wieder keine Quelle angegeben... :(
flohoff (2024-06-08 07:37:05+00:00): Super,
hier hat das routing mal einen besseren Weg genommen:

Rot alt - Grün neu:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=778268,781622

So als positives Feedback

Flo
Patrickov (2024-06-08 06:13:25+00:00): This change reverses damages done in changesets 146471111, 148465555 and 150429168
HristoHristov (2024-06-12 07:34:51+00:00): Duplicate (to already existing Way: Ego Pizza & Grill (567827488)).
Created it by mistake, sorry.
Please remove it.
(MAPS.ME doesn’t allow me to edit objects created by me.)
Dimitar155 (2024-06-14 06:17:58+00:00): Done in changeset/152575112 by @Fraxi
ArabianNaito (2026-06-07 13:52:17+00:00): Then what type is then???
ivanbranco (2025-07-23 08:41:12+00:00): Hi LuxuryCoop,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11963979513

is there a reason the natural=tree tag is missing here? or just a mistake?

thanks and good mapping
Warin61 (2024-06-10 00:59:24+00:00): Reverted. 

The island already has 2 admin relations...
demon_box (2024-06-08 15:08:31+00:00): Ciao, Benvenuto!
Ti segnalo che in Italia NON si deve mai mappare il civico sull'intero edificio in quanto definisce soltanto il punto d'accesso (entrata/porta) e non appunto tutto lo stabile. Infatto uno stesso edificio potrebbe avere più entrate e più civici. Si preferisce perciò mappare i tags dell'indirizzo su un nodo separato ma adiacente all'edificio. Per questa volta ho già provveduto alla correzione. Grazie x la collaborazione e BuonMapping!
Lapismo (2024-06-08 15:47:28+00:00): Grazie a te! Sono alle prime prove e sto apprendendo per tentativi... dopo avere ricercato in rete indicazioni su come operare, beninteso. In questo caso, però, avevo capito male. Il discorso sulle entrate multiple non fa una piega (l'avevo pensato anch'io ma poi mi ero "buttato"...).
demon_box (2024-06-09 07:02:14+00:00): Ciao, per avere un aiuto visto che hai appena iniziato a mappare, ti consiglio di vivamente di registrarti in questo forum (italiano):
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/it/60
nel quale puoi chiedere e ricevere risposte tempestive su qualunque aspetto/dubbio che potrai avere.
Ciao!
Dani CS (2025-09-18 19:58:43+00:00): Bonjour, le rond-point Charles-Ginesy (qui vient d'être supprimé dans changeset/172129436)  n'apparaît sur aucune vue aérienne entre 2014 et 2025. À partir de quelle source a-t-il été ajouté sur la carte ? Avec d'autres contributeurs sur Telegram, on se demande s'il a  veritablement existé sur le terrain ?
Dani CS (2025-09-18 20:06:24+00:00): Je peux corriger mon message : le rond-point a été inauguré en 2024 (https www nicematin com /vie-locale/un-nouveau-rond-point-inaugure-dans-l-arriere-pays-de-nice-son-nom-suscite-la-controverse-926211).

Un revert du changeset 172129436 est en préparation.
tastrax (2024-06-08 11:28:25+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
eggie (2024-06-08 11:56:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
literan (2024-10-17 12:50:27+00:00): Зачем вы исправили корректные названия улиц? слово "Улица" (если это не притяжательное) должно идти после определения. Об этом есть соглашение сообщества. Все подобные правки придется откатить

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3#%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-01 18:47:38+00:00): why you removed it? It looks like per-lane tagging in a wrong key
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-01 18:48:25+00:00): oh well, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/map()/blocks
tastrax (2024-06-08 11:12:12+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
ManuelB701 (2024-06-08 09:39:30+00:00): I'm pretty sure that the key was supposed to mean access:lanes and not just access (given the context of the other tags) and removing them is a bit harsh unlike all the other key removals with truly nonsensical values and no way to decipher their true purpose.
NeisBot (2024-06-08 08:24:24+00:00): Hi nmimn, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1290401828

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-08 17:20:13+00:00): Thanks for your mapped beach.
Looks good!

#HappyMapping
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-09 16:06:32+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80585419/history has access = fixme that was added in this edit
what exactly needs to be fixed here? Is it marked as unknown? Maybe it can be simply left empty?
rene78 (2024-06-08 10:05:48+00:00): Hi Map47,

I didn't really understand this changeset. "problem duplicate_node" means what exactly?

Thanks
Rene
Map47 (2024-06-08 10:35:42+00:00): Hi rene78,
Basically, the same vertex was determined by two points.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=9.49136&lat=47.66905&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.21&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
I merely merged the duplicate points.
Sincerely
rene78 (2024-06-08 11:01:23+00:00): Thanks for the hint! OsmAnd seems to have "destroyed" this polygon.
rene78 (2024-06-08 11:30:07+00:00): Opened an issue in OsmAnd. https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/20031
SomeoneElse (2024-06-08 14:40:18+00:00): Have you tried looking at the history to see which is correct for which part of the road?
Removing "obviously wrong" data without fixing the underlying problem doesn't help get the data correct.
Frans S (2024-06-17 12:51:13+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared. 

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152403926
StefanHRT (2024-06-08 08:50:48+00:00): Hey, das sollte bestimmt statt "is_sidewalk" "is_sidepath" heissen, damit das straßenbegleitende zu erkennen ist. ;)
VG Stefan
mueschel (2024-06-08 09:05:31+00:00): Das kann gut sein. Allerdings gibt es genau dafür das wesentlich häufiger benutzte und ältere

highway=footway
footway=sidewalk 

bzw hier, wo es als path getaggt ist

highway=path
path=sidewalk
StefanHRT (2024-06-08 11:38:12+00:00): Ist richtig, der andere Tag hat was mit mit der Verkehrswendegruppe zu tun. Kann ja mal Tordans Bedcheid geben damit er dies aufklärt 😉
aTarom (2024-06-08 09:13:03+00:00): Hola Bienvenido, se han quedado unos nodos con el tag
patamalara=caja
y
otros con
powerpole=1
quizás quieres indicar la presencia de postes indicativos de alguna ruta? soportes de linea eléctrica?

Saludos
Aerond (2024-06-09 20:12:51+00:00): Hur fick du reda på att det är fel? 
Om NVDB har fel så borde du rapportera det på https://nvdbpakarta.trafikverket.se/map
Bosseifalun (2024-06-09 20:54:17+00:00): En väg heter inte Norsbobäcken. Vägen borde heta Kniptjärnsvägen, ser att det namnet har vägen på S om E16 som går jämte Norsbovägen. Något måste blivit fel när namnen sattes på vägarna.
akimapbuilder (2024-06-10 10:13:35+00:00): When adding building, try to follow building footprints and match the geometry. Cheers!
ljc_jlyb (2024-06-09 01:03:24+00:00): 意义不明
richlv (2024-06-09 18:35:49+00:00): Kuros datos/orto redzamas šīs ēkas, piem., https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1290407963/history ?
Paskatījos Orto_LKS un ESRI, VZD ēku kontūrās - nekur nemanīju.
HellMap (2024-06-09 18:45:29+00:00): Kadastrā. Es nezinu, kāds VZD slānis tev ir, bet iD standarta kadastrs vai arī tas LVM salīmētais. Bet jebkurā gadījumā, tur tavā Mapillary arī visi redzami kā jau gatavi. Es to tavu kaļķu torni saskatīt centos. :D
richlv (2024-06-09 19:24:50+00:00): Āāāā. Tik precīzi no kadastra, ka datu līnijas pilnībā paslēpa.
Kadastrā liela iespēja, ka neprecīzi, bet to jau no svaigākiem orto pēc tam varēs.

Ceplis te redzams, būs arī svaigākas bildes drīz :)
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=298098425264434
HellMap (2024-06-09 20:43:34+00:00): Es jau neko vairāk par aptuvenu kvadrātiņu arī nezīmēju šitādiem. Tur jau kadastrā vēl ar visādiem izbīdījumiem.

Foršas bij. vējdzirnavas!
silversurfer83 (2024-06-08 12:34:35+00:00): Moin Dave :)

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht. Ich mach das mal:

Die Änderung sieht schon ziemlich gut aus. Kommentar in Ordnung, gute Quellenangabe, die Eigenschaften der Hydranten sind (fast) in Ordnung. Die Positionierung kann ich nicht überprüfen, aber ich gehe davon aus, dass du dir Mühe gegeben hast.

Warum schreibe ich "fast"? Eine Kleinigkeit hab ich noch gefunden, die du besser machen kannst: Das survey:date wird, wie alle Kalenderdaten bevorzugt im Format YYYY-MM-DD (ISO8601) erfasst.
Das ist alles, was es zu meckern gibt ;)

Also: weiter viel Spaß an der Karte auf dass die Feuerwehr die Hydranten nur für Übungen braucht.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152405326
NieWnen (2024-06-08 14:22:05+00:00): Usunąłem zbędne `name` z obu hydrantów: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152416915
SomeoneElse (2024-06-10 12:46:26+00:00): Hello,
Does the new bit of NCN552 replace the old bit to the west?
There are now two almost parallel sections: http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=6209872
Previously there was just a gap:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1MGF 
Best Regards,
Andy
FellRnr57 (2024-06-10 14:55:19+00:00): Not yet had a chance to check whether the route to the west is correct or not (the route I've mapped is the one signposted). I've left it until I'm sure.  I've messaged you with greater detail. Thanks, El.
mcliquid (2024-06-20 09:18:00+00:00): Hallo und vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag,

bitte beachte jedoch: Changesets sollten lokal sein.

In deinem Fall bitte vor dem Ortswechsel immer alle Änderungen in StreetComplete hochladen!

Um Konflikte zu vermeiden und aus Höflichkeit gegenüber anderen wird empfohlen:
• Änderungen in einem kleinen geografischen Bereich zu kombinieren (innerhalb einer Stadt, eines Bezirks oder einer Provinz)
• Änderungen innerhalb desselben Landes zu halten
• Änderungen hochzuladen/speichern, bevor man in einem anderen Gebiet weiterkartiert

Warum? Schau dir den Abschnitt "Geographische Größe von Changesets" auf dieser Wiki-Seite an:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Danke für die Berücksichtigung, einen schönen Tag noch und fröhliches Mappen!
Horst_Commander (2024-06-20 11:10:11+00:00): Hey, vielen Dank für den Hinweis.