piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Lostmonkey (2024-12-04 16:58:10+00:00): Jeg kan altså hverken ude i gaderne eller online se noget, som understøtter at denne rute eksisterer på en måde, der gør at den skal tilføjes OSM (og leve op til retningslinjerne for tilføjelse af ruter). Kan kun finde nogle sider (bl.a. kunstprojektets) med adresser på værkerne, et par nyhedsartikler med forslag til rækkefølgen at se vægmalerierne i (blot sorteret adresseliste), en side der sælger deres egen rutevejledning, samt at Aarhusguiderne på et tidspunkt har tilbudt en byvandring. Generelt er OSM jo kun til "officielle" ruter, der er skiltet ude i virkeligheden eller er alment kendt. Der findes adskillige andre apps/websites, der er beregnet til at man kan dele egne ruteforslag (som dette vist mest er?).
Leif Lodahl (2024-12-04 18:49:36+00:00): Det er nogen tid siden jeg har lagt ruten ind. Kortet hvor ruuten fremgår, kan købes her: https://shop.opdagdanmark.dk/produkter/aarhus-streetart-walk .
Lostmonkey (2024-12-04 19:04:04+00:00): Jep, det var den side jeg omtalte som en side, hvor man kan få et ruteforslag mod betaling. Det understreger blot at det ikke en rute, man kan se opmærket ude i virkeligheden eller andre steder. Derfor mener jeg, at den ikke hører til på OSM. I hvert fald ikke, hvis man skal holde sig til de retningslinjer for ruter, der beskrives på https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dfoot
Lostmonkey (2024-12-20 23:03:15+00:00): Jeg har erstattet rute-relationen med en site-relation efter forslag i forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ok-to-remove-route/123046
D R Syfydrin (2024-11-01 17:56:57+00:00): Updated ruins
eggie (2024-10-30 20:10:23+00:00): Dag spughetti    

Bedoel je wellicht old_name? 

MVG
eggie
spughetti_tomtom (2024-11-01 10:21:22+00:00): Oof, ja. 'Tis nu aangepast. 😸
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-30 11:26:40+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12300085077/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
martinst (2024-10-31 05:19:29+00:00): Hallo sagrnn,
wäre es möglich dass Du aussagekräftige Changeset-Kommentare verwendest?

Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Gruß Martin
sagrnn (2024-10-31 19:31:34+00:00): Hi,
danke für den Hinweis.
Mach ich in Zukunft gerne.
D R Syfydrin (2024-11-01 17:54:50+00:00): Added mining ruins
SomeoneElse (2024-11-23 15:33:52+00:00): Hello again RedSkies,
Why did you delete https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1328973938/history here?
Best Regards,
Andy
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-30 19:58:38+00:00): You just got rid of a lot of road name additions and road repairs.  A filter should have been used if you wanted to revert.  These road fixes and names will need to be re-reverted or readded.  I'm not readding the names again from TIGER.
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-30 20:00:27+00:00): Actually, mind if I ask what you were trying to readd?

It appears you just deleted a bunch of info, rather than readded?  I guess I am confused on what you were actually trying to revert since your comments don't really explain it or identify what and why.

Thank you.
Gwen Beynon (2024-11-01 16:54:09+00:00): Added ruins
Gwen Beynon (2024-11-01 16:53:53+00:00): Added ruins
Gwen Beynon (2024-11-01 16:51:16+00:00): Added ruins
Gwen Beynon (2024-11-01 16:50:58+00:00): Added ruins
Gwen Beynon (2024-11-01 16:45:20+00:00): Extended Farm boundary as I know the family.
MK 1 (2024-11-05 06:52:49+00:00): R2251 is a regional road, not an unclassified.
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-30 20:08:38+00:00): Reverted due to mistake by self.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158557676
Gwen Beynon (2024-11-01 16:43:11+00:00): Added Green Bridge marker
D R Syfydrin (2024-11-01 16:06:57+00:00): Added ruins
Osmwithspace (2025-01-06 11:16:27+00:00): Mach doch gerne ein paar mehr Details in die Beschreibung ;-)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158558262
Osmwithspace (2025-01-06 11:16:28+00:00): Mach doch gerne ein paar mehr Details in die Beschreibung ;-)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158558262
Osmwithspace (2025-01-06 11:16:32+00:00): Mach doch gerne ein paar mehr Details in die Beschreibung ;-)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158558262
Osmwithspace (2025-01-06 11:19:04+00:00): Sorry, OSMCHA ist ein bisschen buggy
micheleOSM3 (2024-10-31 05:36:06+00:00): Ciao Maicol, hai rotto la relazione del sentiero 611, poco male, l'ho messa  a posto io. Buon mapping.
micheleOSM3 (2024-10-31 05:45:53+00:00): Mi correggo, hai rotto anche altre 2 relations: "Sentiero Italia Ciclo - tappa A04-A" e "Cammino Celeste Italia - 9 Dogna - Camporosso", comunque le ho messe a posto
maicolgalante (2024-10-31 11:22:37+00:00): Ciao Michele, mannaggia con le relazioni ammetto sono un disastro.
Lavorando con JOSM mi capita che non mi avvisi della presenza di una relazione e quindi tiro dritto.

Grazie per aver controllato e corretto!

Farò più attenzione in futuro ;)

MG
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-30 21:01:05+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1329252730

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Sanniu (2024-10-31 08:59:35+00:00): hi, there can not be both https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1211779201 and new roads, can you remove redundant roads?
rarad74 (2024-10-30 21:07:24+00:00): Salut. Poate ne explici si noua astia mai fraieri pe viitori ce editezi. Un singur punct nu e suficient...
Tinu2048 (2024-10-31 11:47:24+00:00): Sigur. In principal editam marimea padurilor, satelor si puneam case random si paduri nemarcate.
Am bagat mai multe edituri ca faceam una cate una
Mazda05 (2024-11-12 19:51:23+00:00): ніяких помилок немає: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access; рішення Кабінету Міністрів України 12.11.2014 №94 "Про припинення руху в пунктах пропуску через державний кордон в Донецькій області для автомобільного сполучення "Успенка — Матвєєв Курган", "Новоазовськ – Весело-Вознесенка" та для залізничного сполучення "Квашине – Успенська""
Dimitar155 (2024-10-30 21:24:14+00:00): Месарницата Абърдийн е на Раковска 123, отбелязана е там (https://www.osm.org/node/3019219513).
Rodrigo Rega (2024-10-30 23:02:46+00:00): Hola, Accai:

Los parkings que se han añadido en esta edición no están correctos del todo. Echa un ojo a este parking para usar como referencia y corregir los que has añadido: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/115566679

Gracias por tus aportes al mapa, un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158559794
silversurfer83 (2024-10-30 21:31:08+00:00): Top :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158559838
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-30 21:40:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1019241396

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rskedgell (2024-10-31 08:17:12+00:00): Is there a sign explicitly prohibiting buses ( https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/362/schedule/3/made#tgp1-tbl1-tbd1-tr17 ) from using the section of Vyne Road passing under Basingstoke Station? Access tags like bus=no represent legal access rights and restrictions.
rskedgell (2024-10-31 08:07:59+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You appear to have moved some bus stop nodes onto the highway. Nodes mapped as highway=bus_stop + public_transport=platform represent the position where passengers board.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dplatform

The place where buses stop on the highway can be added as a public_transport=stop_position node.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_position

The platform and the stop position can be linked together using a public_transport=stop_area relation.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_area

Please ensure that you have read and understood the documentation before making further edits to bus stops. If you need any help, feel free to ask.

I have reverted your edit in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158570330
mart3nsite (2025-07-03 13:12:28+00:00): Cette modification est erronée, elle supprime des données à jour. Merci de ne plus modifier automatiquement les pistes de ce parc (les coureurs utilisant strava ne passent pas uniquement sur les pistes forestières mais aussi sur des sentiers à peine tracés). Je rétablie donc la version précédente.
Mevess (2025-07-04 07:32:45+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour votre vigilance,
Veuillez m'excuser pour ces modifications faites d'après une seule et unique source.
J'ai corrigé les chemins en croisant le lidar IGN et l'ortho.
Bonne carto!
Mevess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158560514
Sven50981103 (2025-10-31 17:24:21+00:00): Laut Marktstammdatenregister sind die Anlagen noch in Planung, dann wäre ein Lifecycle-Tag construction:power=generator besser.

Für leichtere Nachvollziehbarkeit:
Node 12300314821 entspricht im MaStR SEE990368793310
Node 12300314822 entspricht im MaStR SEE936679853657
Beide sind mit 7MW angegeben.
G4rden3r (2025-05-29 18:04:20+00:00): Moin,

kurze Sache könntest du deine Änderungeskommentare bitte etwas aussagekräftiger machen. mit "Details" kann keiner etwas anfangen. Was für Details. Ich würde es akzeptieren bei kleineren Sachen, aber hier hast du ganz schön viel gemacht. Da wäre sowas wie "Fußwege separat gemappt" oder so ähnlich deutlich leichter zu verstehen.

VG
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-30 22:40:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1329252730

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2930239784

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MxxCon (2024-10-31 00:23:46+00:00): Hello.
Please split your edits based on their geographic locations. In this case there's no reason for edits from around Toms River be submitted with edits from around Hanover. They should be 2 separate edits.
Hufkratzer (2024-10-31 18:43:38+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1329498622 does not look like a horse riding centre (tag leisure=horse_riding), it looks like a horse riding arena (tagging should be: leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian); see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154600456
NeisBot (2024-10-30 23:24:38+00:00): Hi heikay, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 83% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 24 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=158562540
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-31 05:28:18+00:00): Ok, some contributors have added buildings, while others have occasionally removed them at a later time.
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2024-10-31 20:37:04+00:00): Hello,
may I suggest to make a little smaller changeset, as this one spans 4 Continents?
Thank you, cheers
   Alessandro
Hidoo00 (2024-10-31 20:47:51+00:00): Omg I’m so sorry, I was so certain I only included the European nodes but all slipped through…
Tatfahren (2024-11-03 13:59:42+00:00): You deleted a lot of advertising column nodes in this changeset. Was that intentional or an accident?
Hidoo00 (2024-11-03 16:21:23+00:00): Shoot, accident, thanks so much for catching this! I’ll revert and redo the changeset without the deletions asap
joost schouppe (2025-01-29 17:03:41+00:00): I'm merging the POI and the building here, not sure why the original mapper wanted them separately. I'm also removing the provides_feature relation because the chapel has no address according to Adressenregister
lakedistrict (2024-10-30 23:41:33+00:00): 5000! 🎉
umbraosmbr (2024-11-04 13:19:53+00:00): essas imagens não são da google, é de um ortofoto que a prefeitura fez, não coloquem que são dados do google porque não pode se usar dados do google sem licença.
santamariense (2024-11-05 22:36:19+00:00): Olá Rafael_Miranda129,

Precisamos que confirme se esses dados (número de andares e altura dos prédios) vieram mesmo do Google Earth / Maps.

Atenciosamente,
Nathan_A_RF (2024-11-20 23:49:49+00:00): Please change maxspeed:type tags when changing maxspeed tags
HeiKue (2024-11-10 16:18:20+00:00): Wofür Multipolygon 18231772 für Trogbrücke Brückkanal (Röthelheimgraben) angelegt. Warum nicht einfaches geschlossenes Polygon?
HAmap (2024-11-14 06:01:57+00:00): Hallo @HeiKue,
ich bin auch für ein einfaches Polygon. Ein MP (outer-Linien für unterirdisches Gebäude) habe ich schon vorgefunden und meine Versuche das (ohne Schaden anzurichten) zu vereinfachen, waren nicht erfolgreich
HAmap (2024-11-14 19:27:00+00:00): Wenn ich das ändere verschrotte ich wahrscheinlich wieder die history - machst du?
HeiKue (2024-11-15 12:59:29+00:00): Erledigt.
Die Brücke war auch noch mit Parkplatz-Weg verheiratet, obwohl die nix miteinander zu tun haben.
Bitte Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159169611 anschauen bzw. Ist-Stand prüfen
HeiKue (2024-11-15 13:02:10+00:00): Wenn ok, schließen
HAmap (2024-11-16 19:13:01+00:00): Gefällt mir! 👍
MxxCon (2024-10-31 01:06:36+00:00): Hello.
Landuse areas should follow their actual perimeter. They should not extend and connect to the nearby street ways.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158563674
jhaluska80 (2024-10-31 01:27:36+00:00): Please reread the changeset comment.  I fixed some of the landuse issues, but not all of them.
MxxCon (2024-10-31 19:56:03+00:00): Yes, you unglued parts of 801714827. But since you were already touching this polygon, it'd be nice to have it completely corrected. 👍😊
mcliquid (2024-11-05 09:53:05+00:00): Hallo, wurde die Änderung am Mariahilfpark in Innsbruck bewusst im selben Changeset durchgeführt?
EinEngener (2024-11-11 19:02:05+00:00): Nein
umbraosmbr (2024-11-04 13:18:12+00:00): Ortofoto é uma imagem gerada por drone, não tem nada a ver com google esses dados. são dados gerado pela prefeitura municipal de BH.
Glassman (2024-10-31 02:12:19+00:00): Google does not allow us to  use any information we find on their websites.   I'm going to revert this changeset.
santamariense (2024-11-05 22:46:26+00:00): malu_luiza6258,

Bem vinda ao OSM. Poderia confirmar se de fato a fonte é do Google Maps/Earth?

Atenciosamente,
Gregory Peony (2024-10-31 02:29:52+00:00): Welome to OSM. This building footprint is valid and the general shape looks to be correct or close to it, however you should press q after tagging to square the corners of features when appropriate. It is difficult to hand draw exact right angles. The building height appears to be invalid based on imagery and it contradicts the building levels tag value of 5. At least one those values is wrong.---You should only contribute to OSM based on sources with a compatible licence; as far as I'm aware google maps and earth do not fall into this category, and so you should not use them when contributing to OSM.--- Thank you for your contribution, please keep this in mind in future.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158564514
BR_pebble (2025-02-14 08:38:27+00:00): Hello Ali Farhatttt
 Thank you for mapping!
 I have Created missing building way 1331312379
 way 1331312378
 Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
 Happy Mapping!
raphaelmirc (2025-05-13 17:18:06+00:00): Área residencial é usada para mapear condominios, bairros, loteamentos, mais não a cidade toda.
stragu (2024-11-01 01:15:15+00:00): Hi David!
What process are you using at the moment for Brissie building footprints? I'm keen to add more around Annerley / Yeronga / Stones Corner, but so far I'm just tracing from Bing imagery, and was curious about your BCC source.
Davie Dean (2024-11-01 02:32:44+00:00): Hi Stragu! I'm using the MapWithAI plugin in JOSM to start with the Microsoft AI buildings, but there's still a lot of work to straighten and adjust them to fit (generally) the Bing imagery. I then merge them with the address import (which I am not a fan off, but anyway) and then head our with Street Complete to do what I actually enjoy. Happy to grab a coffee or cake sometime if you want a demo.
stragu (2024-11-01 04:40:52+00:00): Thanks! :)
Would love to catch up! I'll send you a DM.
tyfi (2024-10-31 03:46:37+00:00): Continues in changeset 158565856
tyfi (2024-10-31 03:46:44+00:00): Continued from 158565852
umbraosmbr (2024-11-04 12:48:29+00:00): Olá Graziella, 
bom dia, tudo bem? 
para o mapeamento de edificações use a tag, building=yes que será edificios e não area residenciais, áreas residencias é usada para vilas, condominios, bairros, para edificações é só pesquisar por edificios e substituir o objeto que você mapeou por edificações.
Russ McD (2025-10-19 11:19:41+00:00): Hi, I note you have tagged this road (Natures Highway) as no access.  Is there a reason as I was hoping to ride it next month ? 
Cheers
Tatfahren (2024-11-03 13:17:46+00:00): Hallo B-Rabbit,
du hast hier als Quelle "dhl.de" angegeben. Diese ist meines Wissens nach nicht explizit für OSM freigegeben.

Hast du eine Ausnahmegenehmigung von DHL zur Übernahme derer Daten erhalten/erfragt? In diesem fall würde ich vorschlagen das im Changeset oder im Benutzerprofil kenntlich zu machen, um solche nachfragen zu vermeiden.

Ansonsten müssten die Daten wieder entfernt werden, da sie sich dann nicht mit der Lizenz von OSM vertragen.
B-Rabbit (2024-11-03 19:14:55+00:00): Hallo Tatfahren,

danke für deinen Hinweis bzw. die Nachfrage.

Ich habe tatsächlich keine Ausnahmegenehmigung von DHL hier erfragt oder erhalten.

Naiverweise bin ich davon ausgegangen, dass die Nutzung für OSM hier freigegeben wäre weil DHL auf der Website selbst auch OSM einbindet. Das ist nach deinen Infos aber wohl falsch.

Ich habe mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158713350 die Eintragung der Packstation rückgängig gemacht.
CurlingMan13 (2025-08-28 17:25:33+00:00): Do you know if bridge is being rebuilt or repaired?
Myazyk (2024-11-13 21:59:32+00:00): Ґекторе1488, Ваші редування недоречні
olehz (2024-10-31 16:29:48+00:00): от чим воно тобі заважало? схожих видалень з твої сторони багато, хотілось би аргументи почути.
Myazyk (2024-11-13 21:53:01+00:00): Клоун, поверни назад!
olehz (2024-11-14 08:19:53+00:00): так я відповіді не було 2 тижні, я ревертнув
rempshaener (2024-10-31 17:19:17+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um Überprüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten, dem komme ich sehr gerne nach.
Ich hoffe es ist okay, dass ich mir gleich auch noch die übrigen Objekte du deinem Account angesehen habe.

1. water_source
Tags und feststehende Werte bei OSM sind in der Regel englischer Herkunft, daher sollte es statt „wasserleitung“ besser „main“ heißen.
2. Kupplungen Überflurhydranten
Zusätzlich zur reinen Anzahl der Kupplungen am besten auch noch die Größe ergänzen, z. B. couplings:diameters=B;B, siehe beispielsweise https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12301047390
3. Nennweite
Bitte ohne Nachkommastellen angeben (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12300985828)
4. Hydranten und verknüpfte Objekte
Hydranten sollten „frei“ eingetragen werden, d. h. ohne Verknüpfung zu Straßen und Flächen. Hier (ist der gleiche wie bei Nr. 3) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12300985828 ist der Hydrant mit der Straße verknüpft. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: In iD anklicken und „E“ drücken – fertig.
5. Kupplungen bei Unterflurhydranten
Die Anzahl der (Storz-)Kupplungen wird nur bei Überflurhydranten angegeben, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12287598960
6. Empfehlung: Weitere Felder
Verbreitet sind vor allem
fire_hydrant:position (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fire_hydrant:position)
ref (Hydrantennummer)

Das sind insgesamt schon richtig gut aus, ich wünsche weiterhin gutes Gelingen. 
Bei Fragen bitte hier im Changeset oder per PM melden – oder erneut um Überprüfung bitten.

Viele Grüße
Deanna Earley (2025-04-21 15:24:02+00:00): PicaPico. DO NOT blindly add buildings without checking the sources, especially when created by "AI".
This changeset added back a load of building that have been removed by local mappers BECAUSE THEY WERE DEMOLISHED!
Your efforts AI shitification is actively making our map and data worse.
Please review **EVERY** change you've made with this tool.
PicaPico (2025-04-24 06:03:25+00:00): Sorry for that. I am happy your comment. It was mapped because it was once by and large empty.  Should you find it unsuitable, please feel free to remove them. The local knowledge is very important. Thank you for your contribution.
map per (2024-11-01 13:37:52+00:00): Hello AlexRyl,

please don't use Maps.me to upload nonsense to OpenStreetMap.
LordGarySugar (2026-06-05 01:24:20+00:00): Horrible quality buildings. Thanks for adding these -_-
Aleksei Gurianov (2024-11-05 13:11:15+00:00): OpenStreetMap'deki restoranınızla ilgili katkınız için teşekkürler.

İşletme bilgilerinizi OpenStreetMap'e eklediğinizi gördüm. Bölgenizdeki harita kalitesini daha da iyileştirmeye yardımcı olmak için Mapillary kullanarak sokak seviyesinde görüntüler eklemenizi öneririm. Bunun için iki kolay seçeneğiniz var:

1. Akıllı telefonunuzu kullanarak:
   - Ücretsiz Mapillary uygulamasını indirin
   - Restoranınızın çevresinde yürürken fotoğraflar çekin
   - Uygulama, yükleme ve konumlandırmayı otomatik olarak halledecektir

2. Eğer bir GoPro kameranız varsa:
   - Mapillary'nin yönergelerine göre monte edin (bkz. mapillary.com/cameras)
   - Çevre alanın görüntülerini çekin
   - Mapillary platformu üzerinden yükleyin

Restoranınızın çevresindeki yaya yolları ve patikalarının sokak seviyesinde görüntüleri özellikle değerli olacaktır, çünkü haritalayıcılara şu konularda yardımcı olur:
- Giriş noktalarının tam konumlarını doğrulama
- Yolları ve erişilebilirlik özelliklerini doğru haritalama
- Sokak mobilyaları ve imkanları belgeleme
- Bölgenin genel haritalama hassasiyetini iyileştirme

Yerel bilginiz ve görüntülerle birleştiğinde, açık haritalama topluluğuna önemli bir katkı sağlayacaktır. Mapillary'ye başlama konusunda herhangi bir yardıma ihtiyacınız olursa bana bildirin!
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-11-01 18:12:50+00:00): Hi, when specifying tag values, it's better to use consistent names. Otherwise programs can't process this data in a consistent way.

In this case, I'd suggest changing shop's value to just "charity"

Please consult the wiki in such cases.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop
eggie (2024-10-31 08:15:01+00:00): Dag Sanne,

Dat gaat niet helpen op die manier.
Dat adres bestaat immers niet op deze locatie.
Je zult een adresnode leeg moeten maken en op de nieuwe locatie de bedrijfsgegevens bijtaggen op de bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie