piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JJIglesias (2026-06-24 00:26:51+00:00): bajo ese esquema estan puestos +12000 poblaciones, con algunas excepciones como Tiquipaya que no tenia poblacion para ser City, pero si tenia un Nombramiento como Ciudad, asi que entro como ciudad sin demográficamente serlo. (ahora numericamente si lo es si no me equivoco)
JJIglesias (2026-06-24 00:35:52+00:00): si Tiquipaya 58223
Me corrijo no era Tiquipaya, era Challapata en Oruro que tenia y aun tiene 12 mil y pico habitantes
5m4u9 (2026-06-24 01:02:33+00:00): Leíste lo que escribiste en 2016 en la lista? city arriba de 10000. Bueno seguro cambiaste de parecer y nunca volviste a escribir en la lista.

Avanzando en este tema, esos nuevos rangos se parecen más a lo de la wiki. Me parece genial.

Entonces queda como dices y aumento:
1-9 -> place=isolated_dwelling

Bueno, con estos nuevos rangos y sin cambiar population... iré corregiendo los que cambié.

Quizá aparezcan más casos como Challapata, la regla sería... si el place=* es capital de provincia o dpto (capital=6 o 4) y no cumple el número >= 25mil se pone igual place=city?
JJIglesias (2026-06-24 02:36:25+00:00): te soy sincero esos isolated_dwelling con nombre ya practicamente no existen, y si usas esa Notacion ni aparecen en el Mapa y los renders no los muestran.

Con respecto a esa condicional de Capital 6 o 4 q es un tema de jerarquia administrativa para OSM, se pueden colocar indistintamente si son Village, Town o City. Yo preferiria mantener el valor de Place según la Demografia, arriba descrita.

Si quieres te puedo pasar la lista de Capitales Departamentales, Provinciales o Municipales. Yo nunca he puesto ese valor en los Place, solamente he usado los valores demográficos para la taxacion.
JJIglesias (2026-06-24 02:42:13+00:00): Hay varias capitales de Provincia que tienen muchos menos de 5000 habitantes (Villages) de hecho hay capitales de provincia con apenas 500 habitantes y lo mismo pasa con capitales de Municipio.

Por su parte todas las Capitales de Departamento son City por cantidad de habitantes.
JJIglesias (2026-06-24 02:59:05+00:00): Muy posiblemente varios Towns (5000-24999) pasaran a ser City cuando los datos del CPV2024 sean incluidos (Hay 6 candidatos para eso)

Y obviamente varios Village tambien pasaran a ser Town (Hay 24 Candidatos)

Tambien es cierto que muchos Village han pasado a ser Hamlets por perdida poblacional...
5m4u9 (2026-06-24 15:26:55+00:00): Los isolated_dwelling tendrán nombres en Bolivia 🤔? nunca vi uno. Solo decía para todos los places tengan un rango, si no te importa lo añado. isolated_dwelling si se muestra incluso hasta farm, pero solo si tiene nombre.

En el estilo de OSM predeterminado y en otros... capital es tomado en cuenta junto a population para mostrar con más predominancia en zooms altos a nivel de departamento zoom (4 a 11)... 

city y town son mostrados bajo un ranking capital * population... por ejemplo: cbba tiene +600 mil y es capital 4, sacaba tiene +300 mil, pero es capital 6... los dos igualan en ranking y se muestra a nivel departamento... pero por capital cbba se muestra con letra más grande... 
 
creo entender su lógica, al parecer en el mundo las capitales son las más pobladas.

En un uso práctico, cuando miras el mapa viendo 2 o más departamentos... creo que el usuario promedio quiere ver las poblaciones más importantes... 

En fin, es bueno que hayamos acordado los rangos...
JJIglesias (2026-06-24 20:15:41+00:00): Si hay isolated dwellings con nombres y demografía, según el nuevo CPV2024, ahora no muestran la cantidad de habitantes de asentamientos humanos que tengan menos de 15 habitantes y una cierta cantidad de casas. En general yo no uso ya el place=isolated dwelling y prefiero usar landuse=farmayard o place=farm. Ademas agrego las edificaciones (buildings) en esos farmyards en la medida de lo posible.

Este censo no resolvió asuntos medulares como las famosas Estancias sin nombre en algunos Departamentos (BEN, SCZ, PAN, TJA, LPZ) que algunas llegan a tener hasta 90 habitantes pero el INE solo las llama estancias (o estancias dispersas). 

En que parte de la Wiki aparece el tabulador q acordamos?

Saludos
5m4u9 (2026-06-24 23:17:43+00:00): entrando en la wiki general ES:Bolivia hay un menú de convenciones, ahí el enlace... pero es este -> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Bolivia/Convenciones/Lugares
JJIglesias (2026-06-25 17:16:13+00:00): Listo, gracias, ya revise, estan muy bien
Saludos
JJIglesias (2026-06-23 17:31:42+00:00): Lo dicho, los City son por encima de 25000 habitantes, No es ciudad con 10000 habitantes
JJIglesias (2026-06-23 17:41:10+00:00): Todos los Place entre City y Village, estan puestos ya en el mapa segun lo definido en el 2016, lo q puede cambiar es que algun lugar po efecto del Censo2024 haya subido de categoria (o bajado) pero lo que esta puesto YA, se ajusta a los criterios de 2016. Deja de cambiar artificialmente de Towns a Ciudades pues NO lo son...
JJIglesias (2026-06-23 17:41:59+00:00): Creo q esta es la 2da o 3ra vez que tenemos esta misma discusion
JJIglesias (2026-06-23 17:32:38+00:00): City segun lo acordado era por encima de 25000 habitantes no con 13000
literan (2026-06-24 20:07:35+00:00): дубль добавили, уже стоит на территории
dima monsky (2026-06-25 05:05:16+00:00): Aaaaa, thank You! Building and Territory, Yard, i could checking clicking Yard
eggie (2026-06-23 17:36:07+00:00): Hoi... dan zal foot =no wellicht ook fout zijn?

Mvg
eggie
eggie (2026-06-23 19:04:13+00:00): Ik heb foot=no verwijderd. bicycle=yes idem. Dat laatste is default en hoef je niet te taggen.

MVG
eggie
Snowschumi (2026-06-23 19:58:45+00:00): Ah ja klopt, er is geen voetpad dus op de straat zou moeten mogen. Thanks voor de oplettendheid!
eggie (2026-06-23 20:03:59+00:00): No problem.. die tags waren een overblijfsel van een afsluiting. Weet eens het newijs dat dat beter niet met. ... =no kan.
dvdhoven (2026-06-24 07:20:26+00:00): Bedankt voor deze aanpassingen.
Ik heb het wandelnetwerk en het Waterliniepad nu op de juiste routes kunnen leggen

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
mavl (2026-06-24 13:44:57+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, зачем в теге "addr:city=Мелиораторов поселок" указана статусная часть?  
  
Почему для этого тега нельзя указать значение "Тюмень", так как здесь находится Тюмень, а посёлок Мелиораторов не является населённым пунктом и является частью Тюмени?
geo_ozon (2026-06-24 16:30:22+00:00): Здравствуйте! Ошибка исправлена, проработаем вопрос с участником.
Sylabowy Kot (2026-06-23 18:13:52+00:00): Czy zajmowany jest wyłącznie przez PSP - do sprawdzenia.
user_5359 (2026-06-25 09:37:58+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531722404. What is the mean of the tags (no other OSM keys)?
AREA = 5059.244140625
AVG_HEIGHT = 0.0
BLDG_ADDR = 31625 SE HINMAN RD
BLDG_ID = 34E17D-01900-B1
BLDG_NUMB = 1
BLDG_SQFT = 0
BPS_BLDGID = 0
CREATEDATE = 2014-01-30T00:00:00Z
CREATED_BY = DOGAMI
FID = 352557
LAT_CTR = 45.3046076
LENGTH = 324.48897593157
LONG_CTR = -122.33820439
MAX_HEIGHT = 0.0
MIN_HEIGHT = 0.0
NUM_STORY = 0
NUM_UNITS = 0
ORIENT = 0.0
ROOF_ELEV = 0.0
STATE_ID = 34E17D 01900
SUBAREA = METRO
SURF_ADJ = 0.0
SURF_ELEV = 0.0
SURF_OFF = 0.0
Shape__Area = 5059.2421875
Shape__Length = 324.48897594409124
VOLUME = 0
YEAR_BUILT = 0
mueschel (2026-07-01 16:51:04+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM. I noticed that you added many "service:abcd" tags. Please don't add this large amount of keywords to objects, use only the tags that are defined in the wiki or as presets in the editor. 
OSM is a geo database, not a copy of the yellow pages or a place for SEO.
eggie (2026-06-23 18:48:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Daar zijn we dan niet zo blij mee. Er is veel schade aan de kaart en je edits zijn gewoon onzin.
Realiseer je dat alles wat je toevoegt ook op de wereldkaart komt. Een spinnenweb van wegen en oa een ziekenhuis in een woonhuis?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-06-23 18:51:01+00:00): Reverted by changeset #184489356 probably vandalism or fantasymapping.
weblogdryads (2026-06-26 21:10:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I’ve squared some of your buildings for you. In the future, use the Q key to square your buildings.
pwbriggs (2026-07-01 07:34:13+00:00): Confirming that "West Main Plaza" is official and/or signed, and not a descriptive name?

Thanks
Dodko (2026-06-23 19:15:26+00:00): There is no radar, there are modules for simulated missions to Mars
mueschel (2026-06-25 18:14:42+00:00): OSM is a geo database, not a copy of yellow pages.

Please do not spam the OSM database with dozens of "service" tags to list everything a company offers. Use one of the documented tags instead.
woodpeck (2026-06-23 18:35:39+00:00): Hello there, please review this contribution. You apparently intended to map a Flock camera, but instead you mapped an unspecified thing with a name of "manufacturer=Flock Safety".
woodpeck (2026-06-23 18:41:43+00:00): Please do not record individual trees as small round "forests" like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531728229 - this is incorrect. Use nodes tagged "natural=tree" instead.
josm19902026 (2026-06-24 07:20:45+00:00): For your information, sir, I rely on the OpenStreetMap documentation for mapping trees via the following link: Tag:natural=wood, which states at the beginning of its quote that it refers to: (Tree-covered area (a 'forest' or 'wood'). Used by some mappers to tag only certain woodland areas with limited or no forestry management, but often used for any tree-covered area.

This tag and landuse=forest are largely synonymous. Some mappers use this tag for any area covered in trees, while others use it for woodland not impacted by human maintenance. This problem is explained in the page Forest. ).

The main problem lies in the quality of the available satellite images for the Algerian region; they are not as high-resolution as those for Europe or North America. To determine whether what we are mapping is a single tree or a wooded area containing two or more trees, a careful visual inspection and the actual geographic location of each tree are required. Furthermore, tree sizes change over time. Therefore, we extend our thanks to the OpenStreetMap developers." Because they provide this flexibility that allows us to transfer and transform as much data and information as possible from images and convert them into accurate graphics.
rskedgell (2026-06-30 08:33:32+00:00): Hi,

The most recent Bing aerial imagery and a response to https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5359067 by a local mapper suggest that the junction of Plough Lane / Summerstown / Wimbledon road is a mini roundabout (with a painted traversable centre) rather than a roundabout. Do you have any information at TomTom which contradicts this?
Ky_AT (2026-06-30 10:29:23+00:00): Hi rskedgell, 
Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
Ky_AT (2026-07-02 14:31:33+00:00): Hi rskedgell, thank you for your time pointing this out to me. I noticed the roundabout sign and modified the geometry, overlooking that the center was traversable. I’ll be more careful with similar situations going forward.
rskedgell (2026-07-02 15:12:11+00:00): No problem, and thanks for double checking. Some of our highway authorities occasionally do a very good job of creating ambiguity!

If it helps, the traffic sign used on the approach to conventional roundabouts is the red triangular warning sign, TSRGD diagram 510. These aren't mandatory, but street level imagery usually helps where they are absent.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_the_United_Kingdom#510

The blue circular sign, TSRGD diagram 611.1, is used on the approach to mini roundabouts.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_the_United_Kingdom#611.1

The centre of a mini roundabout also has a white centre with three curved arrows around it, as shown in TSRGD diagram 1003.4 (not yet in the OSM wiki).
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/362/schedule/9/made#tgp3-tbl3-tbd1-tr5-tc2
notj (2026-06-23 19:12:50+00:00): Forgot to add that the source is me since I have firsthand knowledge of this area
osmviborg (2026-06-24 06:28:36+00:00): source:maxspeed skal så ændres til sign
b-holdet (2026-06-24 06:35:31+00:00): Tak og rettet 👍
bxl-forever (2026-06-23 22:58:50+00:00): L'info est déjà sur OSM, avec les permissions d'accès.
Ici, vous avez ajouté une restriction oneway, qui détruit les liaisons cyclistes et TC.
Ceci n'est pas correct.
Votre modification a été annulée.
LouisXIV (2026-07-15 22:39:52+00:00): Vos modifications de chemins ne sont pas bonnes. J'ai été sur place récemment et je confirme que c'est bien grade2 et compacted. 
Lisez bien les définitions des tags sur le wiki avant de les utiliser au feeling.
user_5359 (2026-06-25 09:58:28+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2sfo ? What is the mean of the tags
DPS = Sud-Kivu
attributio = Référentiel Géographique Commun (RGC.cd) (did you mean attribution)
health_lev = 8 (did you mean health_level, see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/health_level)
is_in_hl6 = Kamituga (did you mean is_in:health_level6)
ref_CDsnis = 62240323 (did you mean ref:CD:snis)
ref_dhis2 = sRUxRtue777 (did you mean ref:dhis2)
source_dat = 2025 (did you mean source:geometry:date)
source_geo = CIESIN (did you mean source:geometry)
?
Sylabowy Kot (2026-06-23 20:11:41+00:00): Można pomyśleć, czy by nie ustawić starej nazwy jako old_name, a ten pochodzący z Wikimapii node ustawić jako label osiedla, dając aktualną nazwę.
gurglypipe (2026-06-23 21:05:04+00:00): Hiya, thanks for your improvements around Hodge Close recently.

Are you sure landuse=quarry is correct here? It’s meant for the mineral extraction areas. man_made=spoil_heap is typically used by itself.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dquarry and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dspoil_heap

Are you tagging for the renderer? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer)
IainTurpie (2026-06-23 21:12:59+00:00): I tagged it as that as it's part of the quarry in a sense, but if that's not the correct way to tag it that's ok :)
gurglypipe (2026-06-24 08:30:04+00:00): Typically you’d have a single area (or a multipolygon) tagged as landuse=quarry, which represents the whole workings of a particular quarry — rather than tagging individual parts of it with landuse=quarry separately.
bxl-forever (2026-06-23 23:03:06+00:00): Bonjour,

Vous avez sans doute de gentilles intentions… mais vos éditions ne sont pas correctes.

SVP ne pas modifier les types de rues, et ne pas introduire des restrictions excessives et permanentes dans la database. Juste une situation temporaire ici. Et pas de blocage des piétons.

Nous corrigeons à nouveau.
bxl-forever (2026-06-23 23:14:12+00:00): Hello,
I wish there was a nicer way of welcoming you to OSM, but I am afraid that you have engaged in changing major roads on the map without fully understanding the dependencies between objects and how the data model works.
This might be a nice edit if our map was exclusively devoted to car navigation… but OSM is a map for everyone.  This edit breaks navigation for cyclists and creates impossible situation for buses, and even for cars there is one part that should have been modified too, to avoid having a two-way road starting at the bottom of a one-way road.
Again, we fixed your edit.
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-24 23:00:29+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the added name real?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457067104
Glassman (2026-06-26 02:06:22+00:00): You've added the private to these ways. No trespassing or similar signs are required before adding the private restriction. There is also the tag ownership=private that is likely more appropriate. Please review your edit to make sure they are correct, otherwise, another mapper may change them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184492932
DressyPear4 (2026-06-23 20:53:41+00:00): Por que ela seria classificada como auto pista se há várias travessias de pedestres em nível?
Trafford_Mapper (2026-06-24 05:26:03+00:00): Hi; Thank you for your edit, I've amended this slightly to 'access=private' which is a more appropriate tag then 'access=no' for this location to better reflect the 'No Public Access' signage, at the Wilmslow Road end, and access which still enables authorised vehicles/pedestrians into the area.
ftrebien (2026-06-25 21:12:11+00:00): Outro mapeador já desfez esse erro, mas qual o sentido de promover a RJ-230 a troncal? Não se encaixa em nenhuma das regras da classificação em vigor.
Viajero Perdido (2026-06-24 04:49:20+00:00): Well-groomed quad trails don't just disappear into nothing in six years.  (I walked and mapped it originally.)

What condition is it REALLY in?
Viajero Perdido (2026-06-24 05:17:14+00:00): Ah okay, I see the main trail is still mapped, as it should be.  But the shorter one connecting to the road past the tree stand (which I chose not to map), I can't believe that's disappeared.

We map what's on the ground, if there's any trace of it. Lots of tags are available to map trail condition, good or bad.  Cheers.
Greg Nicholson (2026-06-24 16:13:23+00:00): I was there yesterday. It's completely overgrown with small trees, bushes and grass.  It is not well groomed.
Viajero Perdido (2026-06-24 16:46:49+00:00): Thanks for clarifying. Sounds like many trails this time of year, which are more visible in the other seasons.  I'd restore the trail (the one in forest at least), and add a suitable trail_visibility tag.  But given this is/was a quad trail, it should still be somewhat visible (and passable) for many years yet.

BTW, the bicycle tag refers to legal state, not practicality (though I have ridden this trail a few years back).  Nothing I've seen here says you can't ride a bicycle on the trails. Cheers.
Greg Nicholson (2026-06-24 20:03:53+00:00): I'm fine to reverse the changeset if I can figure out how.
Viajero Perdido (2026-06-25 00:15:19+00:00): I can take care of it; thanks for understanding.

I'm okay with leaving the pond-edge trail deleted; it never amounted to much of anything.  Cheers.
lirasevla (2026-06-23 23:01:37+00:00): This court is not a tennis court but rather a futsal or multipurpose court; it doesn't have the characteristics of a tennis court.
caprieldeluca (2026-06-24 01:04:24+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa!
Despegué el nodo del árbol del camino porque no puede ser ambas cosas a la vez. Pero desconozco de que lado está, si podés acomodarlo mejor. Gracias!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto
SirAdams (2026-06-24 16:22:50+00:00): https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1thOLmiWwDvl3JcUwPPCHAHeFhJc_ujtw?usp=sharing
Dokumenty z przetargu pokazujące drogę po przebudowie!
aighes (2026-06-23 23:54:27+00:00): Please use proper changeset description and stop messing around with the boundaries.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184494814
GUFSZ (2026-06-25 05:53:09+00:00): Der access-tag ist ein rein rechtlicher Tag. Dies bedeutet, ob komoot darüber routet oder nicht, ist vollkommen irrelevant. Da es sich einem Anschein nach, um einen Waldweg handelt, schaue im Waldgesetzt des Bundeslandes nach, ob dieser Weg verboten ist oder nicht, oder ob es entsprechende Verbotsschilder gibt.
CycleMapper (2026-06-25 07:18:55+00:00): Ich hab doch hier gar kein access tag verwendet?
GUFSZ (2026-06-25 15:32:54+00:00): Ja du hast recht.Entschuldigung bitte, es war eine Art Vorverurteilung wegen deiner Begründung.
BCNorwich (2026-06-26 04:47:29+00:00): Way: 1531767298 removed it's a duplicated highway disrupting routing.
caprieldeluca (2026-06-24 00:55:24+00:00): Hola, gracias por colaborar con el mapa!
Edité el número de teléfono para adecuarlo a un formato que consideramos válido.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto
rajdhani (2026-06-26 03:29:40+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184623817
nevw (2026-06-24 01:12:05+00:00): Hi, you have added 3 defibrillators to the same place. Are there 3 of them here?
nevw (2026-06-24 05:51:43+00:00): Fixed defibrillators
topolusitania (2026-06-24 01:19:14+00:00): Wrongly deleted data

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184499828
MappingMore (2026-06-28 04:56:57+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184726474
topolusitania (2026-06-24 01:14:10+00:00): Wrongly deleted data

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184499663
ion_chi (2026-07-07 16:22:42+00:00): I'm not sure about deleting this segment while the bridge is still there, even if access isn't allowed. The previous access=no, maybe with the removal of bicycle=yes and foot=yes, seems more correct
ianrbuck (2026-07-07 21:33:03+00:00): Hmm, I suppose that can be important if there are height restrictions for the highway under the bridge. I'm just always nervous that navigation apps will continue trying to use a route even if the way is tagged as access=no. Is it possible to mark a bridge structure without there being a highway way on it?
ianrbuck (2026-07-07 21:45:06+00:00): I added a bridge structure, what do you think of that solution?
ion_chi (2026-07-08 00:10:08+00:00): The physical path is still there, it's just currently inaccessible to the general public. Routers should be able to handle access=no, a standard tag.
ion_chi (2026-07-08 00:32:09+00:00): I restored the path and removed bicycle=yes and foot=yes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185306757 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185306907
topolusitania (2026-06-24 01:48:26+00:00): wrongly deleted data

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184500792
kingkingHK (2026-06-24 03:03:24+00:00): Why? Shouldn't the higher one be used?
Kovoschiz (2026-06-24 17:59:19+00:00): This section is only useful for Chak Cheung St, `=service` Sui Cheung St , and Kiu Ha Rd. Or do you want to consider MOS Rd u-turn for Tai Po Rd Sha Tin?
kingkingHK (2026-06-25 02:51:26+00:00): MOS Road <-> Tai Po Road (and hence Shing Mun and Tsing Sha) deserves `=tertiary` at least imo. This is the only way without any traffic lights, at least until T4 opens, so it should be somewhat competitive.
Kovoschiz (2026-06-25 16:40:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184594847
adgo1 (2026-06-26 08:33:59+00:00): ?? die Gebäude sind tatsächlich physisch verbunden. Unabhängig von der NRW Kataster Karte.
Bienson (2026-07-05 01:59:34+00:00): Ja, dort befindet sich ein schmaler Anbau zwischen Garagen und Haus. Wahrscheinlich eine Überdachung.
topolusitania (2026-06-24 01:08:54+00:00): Wrongly deleted data

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184499466
elsy1 (2026-06-29 07:50:27+00:00): درود و وقت بخیر، منطق و اساس ذهنی شما برای تغییر تگ خیابان هایی که اکثرا صلاحیت دریافت تگ پرایمر را ندارند چیست؟ ممنون میشم توضیح دهید
Gitasaleh Virast (2026-06-29 18:35:18+00:00): این کاربر (amta68) فرهنگ اوپن استریت مپ را بلد نیست. باید قطع دسترسی شود.
علاوه بر اعطای تگ پرایمر روی معابری که تگ پرایمر نمی‌گیرند:
بزرگراه دماوند و کدگذاری معابر
Gitasaleh Virast (2026-06-29 18:38:48+00:00): حذف کدگذاری معابر، اعطای تگ پرایمر روی معابری که صلاحیت تگ پرایمر را ندارند و ماجرای اتوبان دماوند، نشانه بلد نبودن ویرایش اوپن استریت مپ می‌باشد.
کاربر amta68 باید قطع دسترسی شود.
پس چرا توی اوپن استریت مپ ثبت نام کرده؟
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-29 23:54:54+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20879
Gitasaleh Virast (2026-06-30 17:43:17+00:00): ۶ ساعت کمش بود
ده ساله مسدودش کنید.
علاوه بر تغییر تگ خیابان، حذف کدگذاری معابر هم هست.
در واقع نقض یک سند شهرداری تهران هست.
topolusitania (2026-06-24 01:58:29+00:00): wrongly deleted data

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184501118
topolusitania (2026-06-24 01:42:41+00:00): wrongly deleted data

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184500618