piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2026-04-14 10:23:50+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, often not squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181313796
somehundred (2026-04-14 11:03:27+00:00): Vai tiešām Narvesen šeit atkal ir atgriezies? Narvesen.lv oficiālajā kartē šajā vietā tas nav atzīmēts un pēdējoreiz, kad te braucu garām, bija palikusi tikai būve.
eggie (2026-04-14 10:35:38+00:00): Tip Sylvia.. svp niet met de kaart schuiven in editmodus. Dit geeft vaak schade.
Mvg
eggie
sylviaadb (2026-04-14 12:21:56+00:00): Dank voor de tip! Ik let er vanaf nu op.
qstep (2026-04-14 12:16:46+00:00): Üdv az OSM-en! Néhány megjegyzés a szerkesztéseidhez:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3334442611 - ezt a GSM antennát miért törölted?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13729608410 - a BestByte helyén nyílt a szerelvénybolt? Ha igen, akkor szerkeszd azt a pontot. Általánosságban nem törlünk pontot. Vannak lifecycle prefixek, amikkel jelöljük, ha valami megszűnt, tönkrement, elhagyatott, stb: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix - Ha valami üzlet helyén másik nyílt, akkor annak a pontját szerkesztjük.

Ez vonatkozik a Főkétüsz és a nem használt Főzde nevű helyre is. Ha ott van még a feliratuk, akkor lehet disused, ha teljesen üres az üzlethelyiség, akkor minden címke törölhető, de a pont nem, és lehet mondjuk shop=vacant 

Bár az iD editor nem jelöli, de itthon contact:*=* címkét használunk email, facebook, website, phone, stb elérhetőségekre.
Number4 (2026-04-14 12:46:51+00:00): Szia!

Köszönöm az infokat, a GSM antennát bambán töröltem, mert nem tudtam értelmezni a térképen, hogy milyen funkciót lát el :/ 

Köszönöm az infokat, a jövőben igyekszem ezek mentén módosítani a térképet!
infeeeee (2026-04-14 13:47:47+00:00): Antennát visszaraktam: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181323973
qstep (2026-04-14 18:27:52+00:00): Hibák javítva: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181336760
NeisBot (2026-04-14 10:06:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/2833413919 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Audio studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
eggie (2026-04-14 10:19:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

De source=BAG data heb ik hersteld. 
Denk niet dat de description problemen geeft. 

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Studio Make (2026-04-14 11:23:48+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. Description adjusted to 'Audio postproductie studio'.
@Eggie: dank voor het terugzetten van source=BAG! Dank voor de hulp :)
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-14 11:30:30+00:00): @Studio Make 👍
bxl-forever (2026-04-14 12:23:02+00:00): Hello, MDK123456.

We understand your concern that traffic should not be sent to private property.

After your last edit, a few months ago, we correctly set "access=private" tags to every road inside the area.  This guaranteed that apps that use OSM data will *not* route here.  This approach works successfully, because every navigation system using the OSM ecosystem (OsmAnd, GraphHopper…) would never send any driver here.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Data from OpenStreetMap is *not* used to feed Google Maps and Waze.  Removing roads on our map will not change anything in those systems, which use their *own* data to provide navigation results.  We have no control over those closed platforms.  Please get in touch with them to request that they adjust roads inside your property.
Wildsharky (2026-04-16 09:30:41+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181401850
hatul (2026-05-20 10:55:31+00:00): שלום,
מחקת בטעות את היחס של שביל ישראל בקטע הבא. בבקשה להיזהר. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1499294436
NeisBot (2026-04-14 10:27:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13729686502 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Metal hardware factory"
---
例如，你的文字可以用更中立和事实性的版本来表达：“金属五金厂”
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
yangqiceng (2026-04-14 10:36:14+00:00): Metal hardware factory
eggie (2026-04-14 10:40:53+00:00): Dag Buitengoed.... De description is niet bedoeld voor zo'n lange opsomming.
Daar is de website voor.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2026-04-14 10:43:29+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-14 10:43:56+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM.

Die genannte "Schweinevilla" hat mich neugierig gemacht, vgl. https://www.internatsolling.de/das-internat/lage-campus/

Danke für Eure Beiträge hier im Projekt.

#HappyMapping
eggie (2026-04-14 10:46:43+00:00): Tip.. Zaken die niet meer aanwezig zijn kun je verwijderen. De functietags staan er nog steeds.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2026-04-14 12:23:23+00:00): Als bovenstaand aangepast...
NeisBot (2026-04-14 10:45:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1499297771 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Accounting office"

#MapWithoutSpam
BCNorwich (2026-04-14 13:17:35+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It's incorrect to map a building within a building. Thus I've converted your building to a POI within the outline of St James House.

Regards Bernard.
Supaplex (2026-04-15 10:35:26+00:00): revert dragged node

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181359830
Herman Lee (2026-04-14 14:10:42+00:00): 由于需要逐步退回用户“哈基米娜美路多”的编辑，可能需要将本修改集退回。
ieguy3 (2026-04-14 11:09:11+00:00): https://www.rctc.org/mcp-ramona-construction-updates/
ieguy3 (2026-04-14 11:13:07+00:00): Sunday, April 12 –
Thursday, April 16
&
Sunday, April 19 –
Thursday, April 23
__________________
 
Nightly, 10 p.m. – 5 a.m.	Full eastbound closure of Ramona Expressway from Rider Street to Warren Road	I-215, eastbound on State Route 74, northbound on N. Sanderson Avenue to Ramona Expressway
ieguy3 (2026-04-14 11:13:12+00:00): Sunday, April 12 –
Thursday, April 16
&
Sunday, April 19 –
Thursday, April 23
__________________
 
Nightly, 10 p.m. – 5 a.m.	Full eastbound closure of Ramona Expressway from Rider Street to Warren Road	I-215, eastbound on State Route 74, northbound on N. Sanderson Avenue to Ramona Expressway
osmviborg (2026-04-14 13:22:40+00:00): ID er et ganske forfærdeligt værktøj til redigering af områder, det generer et jammer af multipolygoner. Før du startede var der én multipolygon, Saksfjed Vildmark, bestående af 6 medlemmer, i området. Saksfjed Vildmark består nu af 39 små stykker. Områderne hænger sammen; men hvordan med at kunne redigere i det på et senere tidspunkt. Du har ikke gjort noget forkert, blot en kommentar.
osmviborg (2026-04-14 13:23:26+00:00): Der er 16 multipolygoner i området nu.
cyclist789 (2026-04-14 14:57:54+00:00): Saksfjed Vildmark er et stort område delt i to, hvis indhegning også danner udkant for en masse andre arealer, så det er naturligt, at det består af flere stykker.

Multipolygoner er *langt* mere elegante at ændre på. Man tilføjer eller fjerner bare stykker, og man behøver kun at tegne hver skillelinje én gang istedet for at skulle tegne den for arealet på hver side. Det gør det også meget lettere at undgå overlappende "landuse" tags osv.
osmviborg (2026-04-14 15:03:38+00:00): Multipolygoner skal kun bruges der hvor det giver mening https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=Relation:multipolygon
cyclist789 (2026-04-15 06:23:10+00:00): Jeg har læst siden, og ved ikke hvad på den du refererer til. Multipolygoner giver mening for store eller komlekse arealer, der støder op mod hinanden.
osmviborg (2026-04-15 06:34:46+00:00): Hvis du mener at Saksfjed Vildmark er et stort kompleks område som nødvendigvis kun kan tegnes med 39 små way's, så har du i min optik misforstået noget. To eller flere områder der støder op mod hinanden behøves ikke at tegnes som en multipolygon, faktisk er det meget sjældent at nogen tegner på den måde.
osmviborg (2026-04-15 07:36:20+00:00): Her har du et eksempel på et stort område, multipolygon, der lever i bedste velgående uden at være klistret sammen noget som helst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7046785
eggie (2026-04-14 11:21:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback..   Voor korte tijd sluiten we geen wegen af met ....=no Duurt het iets langer dan wordt dat met conditionaltags gedaan.
Bv
access:conditional=no @ (2025 Sep 20-2026 Apr 03)
Dan gaat de weg weer automatisch open na datum.
Hie lang gaat dit duren? 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-14 11:25:35+00:00): Ik heb de afsluiting weer ongedaan gemaakt. Ook in Melvin is niets te vinden. 
https://melvin.ndw.nu/public

MVG
eggie
rskedgell (2026-04-15 14:40:22+00:00): Let's just call it an unsuccessful attempt to cheat at Pokémon Go?

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/beware-of-fake-beaches-pokemon-go/112413/84
rskedgell (2026-04-15 14:46:28+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181371201
eggie (2026-04-14 11:32:48+00:00): Dag Heind, 
Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-15 07:05:55+00:00): Dag Buitengoed,
Lijkt me oke.
Het akkerland heb ik afgescheiden en is nu grasland. 
CTRL-F5 voor het effect
MVG
eggie
rarad74 (2026-04-15 08:28:21+00:00): Salut. Te rog nu mai folosi imaginile Bing. Sunt foarte vechi - mai mult de 8-10 ani. Foloseste ESRI standard. Mapbox sunt cele mai noi, dar nu sunt centrate bine.( trebuiesc re-calibrate inainte de fiecare editare).
SZ475 (2026-04-15 08:34:42+00:00): Salut! ESRI are o claitate destul de joasă față de Bing, m-am folosit de amândouă, verificând dacă clădirile de pe Bing încă există, dar cred că am ratat câteva. O să mă rezum la ESRI momentan, o să încerc să fac rost și de Mapbox. Mulțumesc de recomandare!
SZ475 (2026-04-15 08:39:18+00:00): Se pare că Mapbox e built-in... Credeam că e separat! Atunci e perfect. S-a încheiat complet cu problemele datorită vechimii imageriei!
rarad74 (2026-04-15 09:00:46+00:00): Mare atentie ca mapbox nu este centrat bine  si desenezi in mod eronat daca nu il centrezi in prealabil..
SZ475 (2026-04-25 15:02:23+00:00): Bună ziua! Se pare că Mapbox este mai veche decât Bing. Am observat că Bing conține lucruri construite care Mapbox nu le are, dovedind că este mai veche. Cel mai bun exemplu este centrul pietonal din Râmnicu Vâlcea. A fost renovat în 2017-2019, pe Bing fiind terminat în timp ce pe Mapbox este încă în construcție. Cred că vechimea depinde de regiuni, unele orașe având capturi mai noi și unele mai vechi. Este posibil ca Mapbox-ul dumneavoastră să fie mai nou pentru că lucrați în orașe unde a fost actualizat, fără a fi actualizat și în Vâlcea, unde lucrez eu. Sau poate vă referiți la un Mapbox customizat printr-un link. O zi bună!
NeisBot (2026-04-14 11:39:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 78 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1499306753 v1 | 47 crossings
https://osm.org/way/135738126 v1 | 10 crossings
https://osm.org/way/115626477 v3 | 9 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1490236324 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181318111
ivanbranco (2026-04-14 12:19:50+00:00): Ciao Fabrizio e Alessia, benvenuti su OSM.

Purtroppo, ho dovuto annullare queste modifiche. In generale se prima di caricare le modifiche, il sito vi segnala ben 37 errori, vuol dire che probabilmente c'è qualcosa che non va.

Qua erano stati trascinate delle strade, sovrapponendole ad altre strade ed edifici, era stato disegnato un ponte non corrispondente alle immagini satellitari utilizzate, i nomi erano tutti in minuscolo, alcuni elementi erano duplicati (il Parco Madre Teresa di Calcutta era già mappato), alcuni nomi erano descrizioni e non nomi propri ecc.
JJIglesias (2026-04-14 22:18:23+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores.

Gracias

En este Changeset hay multiples errores q deben ser corregidos...
JJIglesias (2026-04-15 17:52:25+00:00): Ya no te preocupes ya corregimos los errores. Por favor tener mas cuidado activando los validadores de JOSM o ID
rskedgell (2026-04-15 14:39:01+00:00): Let's just call it an unsuccessful attempt to cheat at Pokémon Go?

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/beware-of-fake-beaches-pokemon-go/112413/84
rskedgell (2026-04-15 14:48:06+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181322868
NeisBot (2026-04-14 11:51:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 41 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1419358462 v1 | 14 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1419358464 v1 | 12 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1418899498 v1 | 9 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13042822547 v2
https://osm.org/node/13039141331 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181318769
iandees (2026-04-14 12:53:48+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13039141331, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13042822547 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181321593, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Frans S (2026-04-14 12:11:12+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped them. However, you did not square the rectangular buildings.


Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181318972
durkie (2026-04-14 12:14:31+00:00): Oh great! Yeah there’s a bunch of intimidating signs around it, but glad to hear it’s actually public. It’s a pain to route around!
bxl-forever (2026-04-14 12:40:30+00:00): Hello, Macnico02. and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

This is another friendly approach to try to get in touch with you.

I have inspected your latest changes over the past few weeks and repaired some mistakes you made when adding sidewalks to the map.  But I see you are drawing the same sidewalks again, reintroducing the same errors.

I can understand that mapping correctly can take some time and that learning is hard.

Adding sidewalks is useful as a "visual" clue on the map.  But once we start tracing sidewalks… they will be used for pedestrian navigation.  Mappers have a responsability: making sure that navigation results will be correct, to avoid ending up with silly suggestions[1].

Here is an example: please inspect the area around this intersection.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34922029

There are no marked crossings… but yet if you have sidewalks on the map it is necessary to add one or two crossings here, which must clearly be tagged as "unmarked" crossings, and which will serve as virtual connectors to guarantee correct pedestrian navigation.  Not doing so means that pedestrians will be "trapped" forever on one side of the road, as long as the algorithm does not have any connector to reach the other side.

I am ready to spend a little time trying to help you understand how this works.  Can I suggest you start by making smaller contributions, i.e. do one street at a time and upload it instead of "all the sidewalks in Tervuren" at once.  This will make it easier for us if we need to reject some part of your changes.

Thanks.


[1] https://worstofosm.tumblr.com/post/791691550703927296/hey-mom-ill-just-pop-over-to-jim-across-the-road
Macnico02 (2026-04-14 15:28:03+00:00): thanks! makes sense!
NeisBot (2026-04-14 12:18:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/553158064 v5 | 12 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181319927
JakovRajić (2026-04-21 13:55:50+00:00): Tag removed from Buddingwood Drive in changeset/181629126
iandees (2026-04-14 12:54:22+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2193314967, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9088876516 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181321620, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NieWnen (2026-04-14 20:37:27+00:00): Ta zmiana również została wycofana z komentarzem takim samym jak tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181323069#c1583480
TrickyFoxy (2026-05-15 19:55:48+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее.

И на этих снимкам трасса, которуб вы удалили видна.
ajmat (2026-04-16 03:52:40+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 181393622, 181393663
NeisBot (2026-04-14 12:33:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11911572987 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "K2 viewpoint"

#MapWithoutSpam
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-04 00:08:11+00:00): Blatant vandalism--nuked SEO spam POI "The Catamaran Spa" explicitly cited as being sourced from Google Maps, and later vandalized by the original SEO spammer, in changeset 183617636

https://osm.org/changeset/183617636
rhhs (2026-04-14 18:34:55+00:00): Why? I re-added it because it's really not shown on the entrance
Dimitar155 (2026-04-14 19:29:58+00:00): They are working as of today, so the opening hours should be signed.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DXGl7rUgOLc/
aixbrick (2026-04-15 08:31:20+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
der Radweg ist bereits an der Straße erfasst (siehe u.a. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28558316: "cycleway"), da er nicht baulich getrennt verläuft (es gibt lediglich eine Art Bordstein).
Die Eintragung habe ich daher rückgängig gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181355124.
Gruß
NeisBot (2026-04-14 12:51:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/514831613 v7 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7173839713 v2
https://osm.org/node/5028907524 v2
https://osm.org/node/5028907527 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181321375
ToniE (2026-04-14 13:15:03+00:00): Servus,

type=route ist hier falsch, oder zumindest fehlt hier route=pipeline

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dpipeline

Es sieht mir aber nach einer Sammelrelation aus, die es (anders als bei Wikipedia die "Category") nicht gibt.

"Alle Hauptwasserleitungen Münchens" lassen sich als Overpass-API query mit ref~'$HW' && man_made=pipeline && substance=water && operator=... && ... ermitteln.

Die Pflege von Sammelrelationen hat sich im Übrigen als fehleranfällig herausgestellt, solche Relationen sind fast immer unvollständig.

Up-to-you.

Gruß
Toni
qkaz (2026-04-14 13:23:02+00:00): Hi Toni, danke für den Hinweis. Ich will eigentlich alle Hauptwasserleitungen mittel mediawiki/kartographer in den Wiki Artikel https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wasserversorgung_M%C3%BCnchens einbauen (als dynamische Karte verlinkt mit der relation). Das klappt aber irgendwie nicht. Die Doku sagt dass kartographer nur mit relation=Route funktioniert daher die Änderung. Kann man die Overpass query auch für Wikipedia verwenden? VG und dankbar für jede Hilfe qkaz