piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Rainero (2026-03-18 17:07:22+00:00): Revert mit changeset/180070225
(unzulässige Quelle)
philipcullen (2026-01-22 22:14:54+00:00): Thanks for fixing this - I had thought the buildings were separate from the imagery, but appreciate your local knowledge.
gurglypipe (2026-01-22 22:27:24+00:00): Yeah, the imagery isn’t super clear, but it is indeed a terrace with steps in height as the hill slopes down to the west.

As per the message I just sent you, this is why I think geometry changes should be kept separate from UPRN additions. There’s so much more to check with them to get them right, if you don’t have local knowledge.
Glassman (2026-01-25 00:35:07+00:00): #TIP: make sure to update the changeset comment be uploading. It makes it easier for others to understand what changed and for you to find an old edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177584281
silversurfer83 (2026-01-23 19:08:56+00:00): Hi there,

in https://osm.org/changeset/169737560 I already asked you to stop using WP as a source because of the licence.

I will do so again in this CS.

Please do not use WP as your sole source for edits. Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177584283
Nakaner (2026-01-23 19:24:23+00:00): I reported GPMapper to DWG because it is the third time someone telling GPMapper to stop copying information from Wikipedia. https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=890496
309_308_307 (2026-02-19 19:23:29+00:00): Hallo, die Glantalbahn ist m. W. nicht stillgelegt, sondern wird immer noch von den Fahrraddraisinen im Sommerhalbjahr befahren. Hast du da andere Informationen?
onterof (2026-02-19 20:47:47+00:00): Das wurde gestern/heute schon im Forum diskutiert und der Konsens der sich ergeben hat ist, dass die entsprechenden changesets revertet werden sollten. Grüße 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/disused-railway-oder-nicht-draisine/141638
juni_vv (2026-01-22 22:54:26+00:00): Why Japan and Canada in the same changeset?
Gicorada (2026-01-23 07:43:24+00:00): Sorry, I didn't notice the one in canada, my other fix changesets are smaller
onterof (2026-02-18 16:29:28+00:00): Hallo, 
auf welcher Grundlage wurden diese Strecken als disused/stillgelegt markiert, gibt es dafür eine Quelle? 
Es gibt hier nämlich, wie schon korrekt getaggt war, regelmäßigen Draisinen-Fahrten. railway:preserved war da eigentlich mMn schon korrekt.
Hightower112 (2026-02-18 17:02:52+00:00): "Stillgelegt" bezieht sich auf die betriebliche Situation der Strecke. Eine Stilllegung ist eine dauerhafte Einstellung des Eisenbahnbetriebs, welche auf dieser Strecke zutrifft. Touristische Fahrten mit Draisinen sind keine Fahrten des Eisenbahnbetriebs.
Vinzenz Mai (2026-02-18 17:11:43+00:00): Das bisherige Tagging mit railway:preserved war vollkommen richtig und in Ordnung, siehe dazu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:railway:preserved

disused ist nicht identisch mit betrieblicher Stilllegung.
onterof (2026-02-18 17:12:39+00:00): Dem stimme ich zu. Eine Nutzung findet statt. Also eindeutig nicht disused.
onterof (2026-02-18 17:16:09+00:00): Weitere Diskussion gerne hier
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/disused-railway-oder-nicht/141638
dmjab13 (2026-01-23 16:15:06+00:00): please do not submit changesets with a bounding box this large. please submit locally focused fixes in batches
Benoît C MdP (2026-01-23 09:24:00+00:00): Bonjour Harvesterify,

Pourtant il n'y a pas de feu tricolore ici. J'ai corrigé.

Bonne continuation

Benoît
Harvesterify (2026-01-23 11:50:06+00:00): Pas selon la note : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5135234
Benoît C MdP (2026-01-23 12:13:18+00:00): D'où l'intérêt de ne pas se fier aveuglement à une note anonyme ;)
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:52:14+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1469628415 v1 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1469628414 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1469628416 v1 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177585280
NeisReview (2026-01-30 07:09:26+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177596984
I-76 (2026-02-02 21:47:15+00:00): *Some levels are partially underground, but most of these are split level houses where the "underground" level has 2+ exits or a garage. Can't really call them underground. Resurvey 4 level houses.
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:55:13+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13295159180 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Yoga studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-30 07:09:18+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177876619
(No visible changes after review)
eggie (2026-01-23 16:43:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:55:14+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/339570757 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Yoga studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-30 07:09:18+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177876620
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:55:15+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13295150317 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Yoga studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-30 07:09:18+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177876621
(No visible changes after review)
pwbriggs (2026-01-24 05:55:16+00:00): I'm not too familiar with the Moses Lake area, but if the camera is manufactured to Flock Safety, these tags look correct to me. Thanks for the contribution!
A67-A67 (2026-01-23 12:41:48+00:00): Hier lijkt iets niet helemaal goed te zijn gegaan. 

In Openstreetmap mappen we rijbanen als wegen en rijstroken als atributen van wegen (met tags lanes en tags die eindigen op :lanes). Vuistregel is: fysiek gescheiden = aparte rijbaan = aparte way; gescheiden met verf = rijstrook = geen aparte way.

Op deze kruising zijn de rechtsaf-voorsorteervakken alleen gescheiden door verf, zoals op de meeste kruisingen in Nederland, waardoor ze niet als aparte wegen gemapt horen te worden. De vorige manier van mappen was dus correct. 

Daarnaast kloppen de voorsorteervakken en bustroken, die al gemapt waren, nu niet meer en zijn ook de straatnamen verkeerd getagd op verschillende stukjes weg.
eggie (2026-01-23 17:31:34+00:00): reverted by changeset #177619166 due to wrong interpretation turn:lanes and lanes.
Het zag er prachtig uit, maar het werkt net iets anders. Ook met de rijstrookbegeleiding.

Gr eggie
juni_vv (2026-01-23 17:35:57+00:00): helemaal goed bedankt voor het advies!!
maro21 (2026-01-24 14:09:28+00:00): Wikipedia cannot be the source of information in OSM, please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Collaboration_with_Wikipedia
fghj753 (2026-01-24 20:06:29+00:00): I'm not the original mapper, but could you clarify, what source should have been used instead considering this change added wikimedia_commons=* and image=* tags?
maro21 (2026-01-28 23:27:57+00:00): No source is needed when adding links
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:55:16+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13470797459 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Computer repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-30 07:09:20+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177876623
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
Sergei Amuzinski (2026-02-26 15:16:38+00:00): Hello Wey2go,
We noticed that the 'oneway' tag was recently applied. Could you please let us know the reason for selecting this tag? We want to make sure it wasn't applied accidentally. Way id: w261518711
Thank you in advance for your help! Your feedback is very important to us. Thank you for your time.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-23 05:12:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zawierać przedrostka.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241271774

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
OrchidA (2026-01-23 18:29:18+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery
Geolarsie (2026-01-22 23:23:08+00:00): Sorry, didn´t realize I still had unsaved changes across the world
dlegg73 (2026-01-22 23:37:44+00:00): Correction: Source used was Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2025-07-27
JJIglesias (2026-01-23 21:43:02+00:00): La llamaran ruta Fundamental, pero esa via es una falacia, hay lugares donde Dificilmente pasa mi vagoneta, como que para ahora la "llamen Fundamenta"... la Hipotenusa de las "Obras" del Ministro Montaño...
5m4u9 (2026-01-24 03:25:54+00:00): Creo que ninguna "carretera" ha sido planificada desde 0 y construida... es la historia sin fin de Bolivia.

Creo entender como funciona esto en Bolivia, primero "hay" un camino, el camino lo usan algo, luego mucho, luego la hace "nacional" para captar más dinero y "mejorarla". Todo cambiaría si las regiones tuvieran "la visión" y el dinero para mejorar, algo como lo que hizo cbba en esta carretera en su lado.

En fin, la carretera tiene potencial turístico por Toro Toro, pero también grandes retos en puentes.
5m4u9 (2026-01-23 14:17:13+00:00): Hola, bienvenid@ y gracias por mejorar el mapa!

Las calles de este barrio y alrededores los puse del plano "oficial" de Cochabamba, pero a veces los nombres son diferentes o como en este caso están más actualizados que el plano de la alcaldía.

Sería genial si puedes definir el sentido/dirección de las calles y qué calles son las principales.
woodpeck (2026-01-23 00:17:57+00:00): Hi, you are adding nudism information to beaches across the planet. Have you visited these beaches in person? Then please set source=survey on your uploads to make that clear. If on the other hand you have retrieved this information from a third party source, then please specify that source so that others can verify that it is a legal source for OSM.
nudebeachmap (2026-01-23 00:20:55+00:00): thanks.. will do.
We have visted in person.
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:55:19+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1083341190 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tatuaż studio"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Tatuaż studio"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-30 07:09:21+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/177605116
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:52:28+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 20 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/583116834 v1 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1469647180 v1 | 15 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5575271375 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177588551
NeisReview (2026-01-30 07:09:26+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177764417
MarcoR (2026-01-23 07:03:52+00:00): Please edit the features without deleting them first. This makes it much easier to keep track of what changes over the years.

See also the difference between "monument" and "memorial" here on OSM:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmonument

That obelisk IMHO is too small to be a monument.
FajrAl (2026-04-01 04:45:40+00:00): Penambahan dalam name:jv=* sudah tepat, tapi jika ditambahkan dalam name=* itu kurang sesuai.
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:52:31+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 27 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/556273149 v5 | 15 crossings
https://osm.org/way/556273152 v2 | 12 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177589646
muralito (2026-01-23 20:59:15+00:00): Hi. On what basis did you made this change? Mapillary imagery in Aug. 2025 show no evidence of oneway signals.
JudaeanDesert (2026-01-26 19:25:10+00:00): Hello,
Since this is a circle junction it seemed like a logical addition. Given your point about a lack of evidence of oneway signals, I am happy to defer to your knowledge on not having a oneway tag here.
muralito (2026-01-26 20:28:00+00:00): I agree that it may seem logical, and even safer, if it were set that way, but the problem is that it does not reflect real-world conditions. These kinds of inconsistencies should first be addressed by local authorities by establishing the appropriate restrictions, and only then should they be added to the map.

In many places, you simply cannot assume that authorities have made a good or logical choice. Just a few days ago, I reached an intersection with a traffic_calming=bump where the highway=stop sign was placed on the road I was about to cross...
JudaeanDesert (2026-01-27 17:45:53+00:00): I understand what you mean, that it’s best not to assume oneways based on logic alone as on-the-ground reality isn’t always the most intuitive. I’ll be sure to look for more definitive evidence, such as signage or road markings, before making updates to oneways in the future. I’ve gone ahead and removed the oneway tag. I appreciate you sharing your feedback and knowledge about this, and hope you have a great day!
MarcoR (2026-01-23 07:28:41+00:00): this changeset deleted a tree which is a natural monument and re-created a generic tree.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177589662
ivanbranco (2026-01-23 09:45:48+00:00): What is the rationale for this edit? What does the comment “fix rail” mean?
mueschel (2026-01-25 11:31:39+00:00): Hi,
you added "addr:postnumber" here which seems to be a mistake and should be "addr:postcode"?
Frans S (2026-01-26 10:33:11+00:00): See my comments on another changeset.
The issues are similar here. 
Very odd mapped. I hardly see this kind of mappings.
Please improve your mappings skills.
Buildings are most often straight forwaring rectangular and can be mapped with 4 - 6 -8 nodes.
You followed treelines and other undefined objects.
You also clustered buildings many times.
Quality prevails above quantity.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177590967
silversurfer83 (2026-01-23 20:08:35+00:00): Hi :)

schau mal hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dlounger

Und wenn du mal nicht weißt, wie etwas sauber erfasst wird bitte nicht name=* als Beschreibung nutzen. Dafür gibt es entweder description=* (für alle lesbar) oder note=* (nur für "mapper" lesbar).

Grüße :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177591114
Drachenkutscher (2026-01-23 22:07:44+00:00): Moin,

danke für den HInweis.

Ich habe nach einer Liegebank gesucht und eine gefunden:

amenity=bench
backrest=yes
name=Liegebank

Nun ist es geändert.

Gruß
silversurfer83 (2026-01-23 22:14:35+00:00): Top :)
Udarian (2026-01-23 14:38:58+00:00): the service roads you added at Southland Mall do not exist any longer due to construction in the area.

Happy Mapping,
Udar.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-02-14 20:12:57+00:00): جزاك الله خير وكتب الله أجرك
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:55:23+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13478253165 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dentist office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-30 07:09:21+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/177695963
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:55:25+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13478295829 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Salsa Academy"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-30 07:09:22+00:00): ❌ Text fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/177611711
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:52:38+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1088464937 v3 | 10 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/9972334808 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177592480
grzegorz75jan (2026-01-23 14:04:50+00:00): Niby fajnie ale w adresie samo 1B to trochę mało.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Pl:Key:addr:*&uselang=pl
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177593059
Koalaman (2026-01-23 10:22:29+00:00): Source might not be legit, feel free to revert.
SD Mapman (2026-01-23 15:59:04+00:00): Hello! The semicolon-separated names mean the road has two names, one on each side.
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:55:26+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13478391406 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Addiction treatment center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-30 07:09:22+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/177595976
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-23 23:17:23+00:00): Fixed bad address tagging in changeset 183087090

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183087090
pwbriggs (2026-01-26 18:02:18+00:00): Thanks. Is there any particular reason you used multipolygon relations instead of just a normal way-area? E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20128685

If you don't know what that means, then it's just because the iD editor can be a little annoying about creating extra relations. Otherwise, I'd be interested to hear your reasoning.
rarad74 (2026-01-23 08:37:52+00:00): Tu chiar ti-ai pus in minte sa iti bati joc de noi pe linie? Chiar iti  bati jhoc de noi? Nu citesti comentariile, nu te uiti pe forumuri, nu accepti explicatii de la ceilalti useri mai cu experienta. NU SE PUN ACELE LINK_uri ca  Trunk Link. Se lasa ca tertiary link din motive de rutare neconforma!
rarad74 (2026-01-23 08:38:34+00:00): BING sunt imagini mai vechi de 8 ani!!! Foloseste MAPBOX sau ESRI!
openstreetmapbuddy (2026-01-23 14:59:35+00:00): Nu exista altele pe iOS in Romania
openstreetmapbuddy (2026-01-23 14:59:46+00:00): Și sunt începător ofc
rarad74 (2026-01-23 20:12:18+00:00): Nu mai folosi IOS. Daca vrei sa faci treaba buna, te rog asculta ce iti spun si o sa fie totul bine. 
Daca esti incepatoru, nu te mai baga la ce nu stii , sau ti se spune ca faci gresit. Daca harta o sa fie salvata cu strazi deconectate asa cum le-ai lasat, nu osa mai poti naviga nici tu pe ele. Nu te va ruta aplicatia pe acolo deoarece sunt deconectate. Faci un deserviciu si celorlati utilizatori, dar si tie!
Ne-ai scos din sarite, sincer....
openstreetmapbuddy (2026-01-23 20:45:38+00:00): Nu am acces la vreun editor mai bun.
Seyruun (2026-01-23 11:37:47+00:00): Oops. Thanks again.