piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2023-12-08 14:26:55+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
sorry to say, but please strengthen your mapping skills.
Your mappings are rather sloppy, not accurate, oversize and not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144634423
philippec (2023-12-28 20:44:35+00:00): AED Zandvoordestraat Oudenburg
Is die in het midden van de straat gezet ?
nivaOne (2023-12-28 23:39:34+00:00): ik heb deze terug op het voetpad gezet. Geen idee hoe dat gekomen is (was gelinkt aan lijn).
Maar er is gelukkig niks aan. Oef.
philippec (2023-12-29 10:03:11+00:00): Dat is 1 van de vele nadelen van het plaatsen op een lijn.
Het enige voordeel is de bescherming tegen Mapcompleters.
MxxCon (2023-12-01 05:07:01+00:00): Hello.
Please split sidewalks for each street so that they can be tagged independently.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144634621
Frans S (2024-01-02 14:39:39+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)

Most of your mappings, (in total nearly 200) were incorrect mapped.
Many oversized,
Sloppy mapped.
Included shadowline in mapping
Hardly squared.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144634784
user_5359 (2023-12-01 09:39:53+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1007446684 (only one example). What is the mean of  the tag atmotorroad = yes?
A67-A67 (2023-12-01 09:49:27+00:00): Hi, This tag is to denote the service station and amenities are located at a motorroad, similar to atmotorway=yes for motorways.
Frans S (2023-12-05 13:46:39+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Mappings not accurate
Buildings not squared



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144634958
AntMadeira (2023-11-30 19:37:20+00:00): Olá, PedroMTG13.
Vi que mapeaste o Açude dos Reis de Moinhos como "dam".
Não conheço o local, mas pelas imagens aéreas parece mais um açude do que uma barragem.
A água passa exclusivamente por cima ou também é libertada por baixo?

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144635057
PedroMTG13 (2023-11-30 20:10:55+00:00): António, em principio a agua passa apenas por cima em situação de cheia, de resto tem um canal próprio. E utilizei a dam porque é o unico que funciona em poligono. A 'represa' só em linha ou ponto. Cumprimentos
AntMadeira (2023-12-01 02:19:01+00:00): Compreendo. O facto de weir não usar polígonos, não quer dizer que não o possas fazer. Apenas não é habitual fazê-lo.
A questão é que uma represa não é uma barragem, e mapear uma represa como tal só porque "não pode ser mapeada como polígono" é pior do que usar apenas uma linha. Se achas que desenhar a área é assim tão importante, podes desenhar uma área com waterway=weir + area=yes, por exemplo.

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
PedroMTG13 (2023-12-01 11:38:37+00:00): Nem tanto ao mar, nem tanto à terra. Apenas que o waterway=weir é uma estrutura de menor dimensão e refere que a agua passa por cima.
topolusitania (2023-12-01 13:27:54+00:00): Não é a dimensão que distingue uma barragem de um açude. Açude é, por definição, qualquer estrutura construida pelo homem, em qualquer material, destinada a criar uma massa de água num rio, e que é ultrapassada por cima pela água.
Pode ter ou não uma descarga de fundo para efeitos de limpeza.
Um açude não controla sistemática e mecanicamente o fluxo do caudal que o atravessa
AntMadeira (2023-12-01 13:32:43+00:00): Precisamente, topolusitania. Daí eu defender que mapear uma barragem neste local é errado, por ser outra coisa distinta. Assim como está, é apenas mapear para o renderizador, uma violação básica das orientações do OpenStreetMap:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3%A1ticas#N%C3%A3o_mapear_para_o_renderizador
topolusitania (2023-12-01 14:56:56+00:00): Exacto. O que existe no terreno é um açude e é como tal que deve ser mapeado. Aliás a foto em perspectiva acrescenta "espessura" ao muro, que uma foto na vertical nunca mostraria
Açude de dimensões razoáveis: Ponte Açude de Coimbra, Açude do Guadiana em Badajoz
Frans S (2024-01-02 13:24:47+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144635132
Frans S (2023-12-05 15:35:57+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset, among others, is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings not accurate mapped.
Collected multiple buildings and mapped them as 1 building.
Buildings not squared.
Please be more accurate. 
Quality prevails above quantity.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144635382
Frans S (2023-12-14 15:25:49+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
PLease map more accurate by following the rooflines (extensions as well) and avoid the shadow next to a building
See this webpage with changes to your mappings
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145116801
Best regards and keep mapping 

Hola. Gracias por la cartografía en esta tarea.
Por favor, mapa más precisa siguiendo las líneas del techo (extensiones también) y evitar la sombra junto a un edificio
Ver esta página web con los cambios en sus mapas
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145116801
Un saludo y sigue mapeando
Frans S (2023-12-05 16:15:24+00:00): Hello again.
Check this page to see the modifications I had to make to your mappings.
The red lines are your mappings.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144796866
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144635538
Frans S (2023-12-05 13:43:27+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings not accurate mapped
Buildings not squared

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144635615
Frans S (2023-12-05 15:04:03+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, nearly half of the buildings you mapped were not squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144635709
Frans S (2023-12-05 15:01:47+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped on most of your changesets. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144635745
Frans S (2023-12-08 15:18:55+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Collected a group of buildings and mapped them as 1 building.
Squaring of buildings. 
Connecting nodes of buildings to other objects.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144635752
Frans S (2023-12-01 15:38:14+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped. 
Not squared.
Collected multiple buildings as 1 building

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144635765
Frans S (2023-12-10 12:56:19+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
However ( all changesets I reviewed)  You tagged the buildings as area=yes. The correct tag is building=yes.
Please keep that in mind.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144635769
Frans S (2023-12-01 15:36:09+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Mappings not accurate and squared. A bit sloppy mapped



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144635778
Langlaeufer (2023-12-01 08:12:24+00:00): Hallo Nilaer,
Danke das du helfen möchtest OSM zu verbessern. Leider waren die von dir eingetragenen Radwege fehlerhaft. 
1) Die Radwege sind bereits als Attribut der Straßen erfasst (cycleway=*) (sichtbar in der Karte von cyclosm.org)
2) Die geometrie war nicht korrekt. Auch werden Schutzstreifen nicht separat gezeichnit (Ausnahmen sind nur Kreuzungsbereiche)
3) Die Verbindungen an den Kreuzungen waren nicht korrekt
4) Teilweise ist dort kein Radweg (fehlendeBeschilderung!)

Ich habe die Wege daher wieder entfernt. 
Grrüße
Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144635790
Langlaeufer (2023-12-01 08:36:46+00:00): Warum hast du diesen Weg gelöscht? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1225915011

Dieser Weg ist ein Fußweg mit Radverkehr frei und kein Radweg. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29553734
Hier ist 30er Zone - da steht kein Vorfahrtszeichen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1993667757
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144635790
Frans S (2023-12-01 15:34:47+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped, however, not all buildings are squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144635802
Frans S (2023-12-01 15:33:15+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings not accurate mapped and squared



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144635879
Frans S (2023-12-05 15:29:17+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Please pay more attention on squaring of buildings.
Don't collect multiple buildings.
Quality prevails above quantity.
Please collect mappings rather than upload very single building

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144635892
Frans S (2023-12-01 15:32:39+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings need to be mapped more accurate and squared.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144635893
Langlaeufer (2023-12-01 08:15:04+00:00): Sollten Radwege fehlen, bin ich dir gerne behilflich diese einzutragen.
https://www.cyclosm.org/#map=16/52.3379/9.7871/cyclosm
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144635935
Langlaeufer (2023-12-01 09:27:28+00:00): Der nördliche Radweg ab Garkenburgstr. und weiter als östlicher Radweg ist jetzt auch als Tag an der Straße ergänzt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144635935
Frans S (2023-12-01 15:30:56+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings not accurate mapped and squared.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144635937
Frans S (2023-12-01 15:30:16+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Square buildings.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144635948
Frans S (2023-12-01 15:28:50+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144635980
Frans S (2023-12-01 15:25:29+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key. You forgot to square several buildings.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144636000