piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 15:26:50+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/253890651/history has amenity = church that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by amenity=church? It seem to be not documented value and it seems to be a duplicate of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship - if you meant christian church then then it is taggable by amenity=place_of_worship religion=christian.
Herzi Pinki (2024-04-11 18:24:46+00:00): Thanks for the hint, I hope it is correct now.
urbalazs (2024-01-23 23:39:40+00:00): Biztosan az egész Béla király sétány tertiary? Nem csak a kompig?
Szem (2024-01-24 10:04:22+00:00): Régen le volt zárva mindkét oldala (csak gyalogosan lehetett bemenni), de amikor ott jártam, akkor az egyik végét visszanyitották (így zsákutca lett), és most autóval is be lehet hajtani. A legfrissebb utcakép is ezt mutatja. Ezért cseréltem le a footwayt, de residentalt akartam, jó hogy észrevetted! Javítottam.
itineris (2024-01-24 11:01:34+00:00): Szia!

A Fő tértől (hajóállomás) délre szerintem továbbra sem volt jó: itt semmilyen utca sem megy, csak a kerítésnél aszfaltos bringaút, a parton térköves sétány, és a kettő között egy szintén térköves sétány. 

"Utca" csak a vízirendőrség épülete előtti parkoló, azaz egy rövid zsákutca a Molnár utca felől.

Kérlek, nézd meg, hogy amit berajzoltam, az szerinted is így van-e! (Illetve ha ott vagy, milyen szélesek az aszfaltos kerékpárutak?)

Üdv:
Ákos
Szem (2024-01-24 19:39:57+00:00): Szia!
Azt gondolom, hogy az utcát nem a szélessége határozza meg, hanem a rendeltetése és a táblázás. Itt nincs kerékpárút tábla, csak egy behajtani tilos kivétel célforgalom, ezáltal ez nem lehet kerékpárút, hiszen arra jármű eleve nem hajthat be, ide pedig be lehet menni az ott lakóknak. (amúgy én nem ott lakom, csak telente próbálom feldolgozni a bejárt utakat) Szóval én szerintem ez így most nem feltétlenül jó. De azért tudok élni vele, ha így marad :)
ZLima12 (2024-06-24 21:31:02+00:00): Hi,

Looks like you added water=stream to the southernmost bit of the Croton River. waterway=stream is defined as "a naturally-formed waterway which is narrow enough that an active, able-bodied adult can jump across it", which is definitely not the case for the Croton River. Thus, I'll change the tag to the more appropriate water=river.
quincylvania (2024-06-29 23:47:00+00:00): Hi, that sounds good, thanks for reviewing this change
gscholz (2024-01-23 08:22:45+00:00): Hi oneho,
this changeset has created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:


https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=17.29371&lat=48.55170&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146566553

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Frans S (2024-01-30 17:00:50+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Very inaccurate mapped. 
Buildings not squared,
Connected nodes of buildings to other features or buildings.
Overlapped buildings.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146567665
UPegasus (2024-01-22 20:16:01+00:00): A good start. Only the contours of the buildings are too big. Try to draw them inside the image of the building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146567692
citrula (2024-01-23 03:15:49+00:00): The name should be title case and with "Road" unabbreviated.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146567764
citrula (2024-01-30 19:07:26+00:00): I fixed this.
kapazao (2024-01-22 20:14:12+00:00): Hola, por favor no cambies la clasificación de las vías sin conocimiento. Has cambiado vías tertiary a motorway_link incorrectamente y sin dar motivos.
Revisa la wiki sobre este tema y ten más cuidado.
Un saludo
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-22 20:20:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10967488381
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/251697577

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Richard (2024-03-06 09:01:07+00:00): This appears to re-add into the NCN 54 relation a section that has been removed from the NCN by Sustrans. Could you clarify why you have done this?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-22 20:30:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241496524

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MaciekMma (2024-01-23 20:17:59+00:00): wedlug wiki numer telefonu musi zawierac prefix kraju, u nas +48
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone?uselang=en
user_2061236 (2024-01-22 23:02:03+00:00): Prosím používejte pro kontejnery ortofoto od ČÚZK, které je aktuálnější a přesnější než Bing
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:%C4%8Cesko/freemap#Ortofotomapa
Jiri Podhorecky (2024-01-23 13:54:51+00:00): ok, díky za info, používám iD takže volím mapu kterou iD nabízí.  Nevím jak použít ortofoto od ČÚZK v iD
user_2061236 (2024-01-23 14:00:09+00:00): Do položky Vlastní v seznamu vrstev zadejte toto:
https://geoportal.cuzk.cz/WMS_ORTOFOTO_PUB/service.svc/get?FORMAT=image/png&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&VERSION=1.3.0&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=GR_ORTFOTORGB&STYLES=&CRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}&BBOX={bbox}
Jiri Podhorecky (2024-01-23 14:54:38+00:00): A! skvěle, děkuji!
Emilius123 (2024-01-22 22:08:30+00:00): Vielen Dank.
tux67 (2024-01-23 08:51:10+00:00): Hi tosm31,
wie stellt sich denn das access=no vor Ort dar? Schild? wenn ja - welches?
Das "no" ist ja eine ziemlich radikale Einschränkung. In diesem Fall dürften noch nicht mal RWE Mitarbeiter da lang. Ich hätte "private" vermutet.

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146568955
tosm31 (2024-01-23 13:53:37+00:00): Korrigiere ich hier (und vermutlich auch an anderen Stellen) - Du hast Recht, Danke!
thibautRe (2024-01-24 19:21:11+00:00): I've updated the tagging for way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1242057519 which was tagged as "motorway" in this changeset, which seemed like a mistake.
jorchr (2024-01-24 22:51:07+00:00): Well,actually this object should be taggad as inner, but the iD editor didn’t allow me to do that, so I taggad it as motorway as a reminder to fix it later in another tool.
AndresDuhour (2024-02-24 11:15:05+00:00): Buen día! el dato de población que ha colocado corresponde a todo el partido, y para cambiar la categoría de town a city deberíamos contar con el dato de población desagregado. http://www.estadistica.ec.gba.gov.ar/dpe/images/Revista%20Poblacio%CC%81n%20III.pdf acá se pueden consultar los datos por localidad para la provincia, que están hasta ahora para el censo 2010. Aguardo su mensaje para cambiar la clasificación, Saludos! Andrés
GERamos (2024-02-26 00:33:59+00:00): Hola Andrés, no, los 101.500 habitantes es el resultado preliminar de población de la ciudad. La población del partido es de 103.787 habitantes. La población rural más la de las demás localidades del partido es 2.287 habitantes, un 18% menos que los 2.796 de 2010.
Saludos,
Germán.
AndresDuhour (2024-02-26 12:25:32+00:00): Hola Germán, muy bien! Gracias por la respuesta. Pensé que era el dato del partido porque había visto en la página del censo los datos sin desagregar para 2022 y vi que el salto fue muy grande desde 2010 ¿Dónde se pueden consultar los datos por localidad? Saludos, Andrés
GERamos (2024-02-26 13:45:44+00:00): Hola Andrés, hasta ahora el único dato publicado oficialmente por el INDEC es la población a nivel partido o departamento, que en Junín pasó de 90.305 en 2010 a 103.787 en 2022. Es un aumento del 15%.
Otra cosa que ha ido cambiando es la concentración urbana: la proporción de gente que viven en la ciudad de Junín, con respecto al total del partido, ha ido creciendo: 89% en 1991, 93% en 2001, 97% en 2010 y 98% en 2022.
Los datos por localidad, por ahora solo se pueden consultar en cada municipio.
Yo consulté al INDEC por email y me respondió Federico Luis Piñeyro (Centro Estadístico de Servicios de la Dirección General de Difusión y Comunicación): "los resultados por localidades se presentarán una vez completada la difusión de todos los cuadros por provincia y departamento, partido o comuna, de acuerdo con las temáticas anunciadas oportunamente".
Saludos,
Germán.
gscscnd (2024-01-23 16:02:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141817649
Skonsultuj to proszę z poprzednim autorem. Jeśli zostanie highway=secondary, to note do poprawienia. Dodałbym też construction=minor.

highway=secondary nie oznacza drogi wojewódzkiej, od tego jest:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:highway:category:pl
Kapinitto (2024-01-23 20:52:20+00:00): Nie widzę potrzeby konsultacji z poprzednim autorem, gdyż droga dalej ma status DW, lecz nie jest ogólnodostępna. Dodam construction=minor. DW925 również jest oznaczona jako highway=secondary
Xvtn (2024-01-24 16:18:07+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your change. Everything looks good to me. One could argue that highway=cycleway makes bicycle=yes redundant, but personally I think it doesn't hurt to be explicit. Thanks for your contribution!
Filip009 (2024-01-23 08:52:22+00:00): Do budúcnosti odporúčam použiť ako podklad digitálny model reliéfu. Je na ňom pekne vidieť takéto lesné cestičky. Alebo aspoň vrstvu Strava. (Neviem ale, kde presne sa to v iDeditore dá pridať).
mueschel (2024-01-28 10:34:14+00:00): Hallo,
alle deine department:* Tags hier gibt es bereits - ohne das "department" Prefix.

stationery = yes
confectionery = yes
usw.
jnighan (2024-01-22 21:21:01+00:00): "name=Route __" is only used on roads that actually have addresses where the street address is, for example, "68 Route 27, Groton, CT", and it is not used on motorways or expressways. It is covered by ref=*
gscholz (2024-01-23 08:41:21+00:00): Hi Manfutu,
your recent changesets have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways, for example here:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=112.36938&lat=39.08687&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146569777

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
sblondon (2024-01-31 07:11:06+00:00): This is incorrect and based on a very out of date satellite imagery. The site has since been redeveloped.
jnighan (2024-01-22 21:21:05+00:00): "name=Route __" is only used on roads that actually have addresses where the street address is, for example, "68 Route 27, Groton, CT", and it is not used on motorways or expressways. It is covered by ref=*
Metzor (2024-02-10 10:41:44+00:00): Hallo Seichter,

oh, schön, du hast die Ortsteile ja schon gemappt! Noch eine Frage: Kriegt die Kernstadt nicht auch irgendeine Relation?

Wäre schön, wenn die Kernstadt hier auch auftauchen würde:
https://parkraum.osm-verkehrswende.org/regions/metzingen/

Viele Grüße
Metzor
seichter (2024-02-10 19:27:30+00:00): Geht im Prinzip schon, nur nicht als AL9, da die Kernstadt keinen Ortschaftsrat hat.
Wenn aber AL10 oder AL11, wäre die Frage, ob nicht Neugreuth auch denselben Status hätte.
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-01-23 10:50:02+00:00): Hallo OvonH,

es wäre hilfreich, wenn Du etwas ausführlichere Änderungskommentare schreiben würdest, damit man nachvollziehen kann was (und warum) gemacht hast. "update" ist ziemlich nichtssagend. 

Außerdem wäre es gut, wenn Du die Quelle der Informationen mit angeben würdest. 

Siehe hierzu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
literan (2024-01-23 18:29:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11541318848 тут как-то странно все в одну точку слепилось
Vas111 (2024-01-24 01:14:42+00:00): Здравствуйте, починил. Спасибо за информацию
Kugelbaum (2024-01-22 22:45:02+00:00): https://postimg.cc/kR9KJTk2
Glassman (2024-01-23 18:51:05+00:00): If I understand this edit, you removed the old Kent boundary that was inside of the existing Auburn boundary. Is that correct? And is there an Lea Hill neighborhood?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146572192
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-23 19:49:40+00:00): Why did you increase it.  Was it wrong/incorrect?
Jayden26 (2024-01-31 00:59:10+00:00): It was probably a little too short and I converted 4784 feet (the actual height) to 1458 meters
BlueButterfly (2024-01-23 22:22:49+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery
opendcc (2024-01-23 10:17:57+00:00): Und die Bahnsteighöhe wird in highways gemessen? Hier eine Höhe von 0.55 highway. Woher stammen übrigens die Daten?
opendcc (2024-01-23 13:21:18+00:00): Ergänzend: beim Mühdorfer Bahnhof kann das nicht stimmen, seit dem Umbau sind als Bahnsteighöhen gleich - außer dem 6/7er und dem (nicht mehr genutzten) 8/9.
Nikolas von Randow (2024-01-24 22:23:42+00:00): Entschuldigung für den Fehler mit highways. Ich meinte natürlich height. Ich muss im dropdown falsch geklickt haben. Das hab ich jetzt korrigiert.
Zu den Werten selbst: Die stammen alle von der offiziellen Seite der BEG: https://stationsdatenbank.bayern-takt.de/StationsdatenbankBEG/Steckbrief.html?lang=de&efz=8000258
mike140 (2024-02-11 22:34:38+00:00): Чому у вас обрізки тротуарів не з'єднані між собою та з дорогами? По таким обрізкам ніяка пішохідна навігація неможлива
Trostianchanyn (2024-02-27 06:53:19+00:00): Я вирішив зробити такі обрізки, бо в реальності вони такими і є.
Зауваження прийняв, зараз тоді їх з'єднаю
Trostianchanyn (2024-02-27 06:53:32+00:00): За таку довгу відсутність - перепрошую
AngocA (2024-09-15 18:53:26+00:00): Hola Karen, Gracia por contribuir en OSM. Sin embargo, si que mapeaste dos veces el mismo cuerpo de agua.
Chequea las advertencias que te hace el editor antes de subir.

Andres G.
JoeGadget (2025-11-16 03:48:05+00:00): On July 11, 2023, Montgomery County commissioners approved setting a 20 mph speed limit on all county-maintained roads in residential communities of Precinct 3 that have residential lot frontage. This road’s speed limit should be changed to 20 mph.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-05 17:40:20+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11541773782/history has access:vehicle that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using vehicle access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:vehicle ) be fitting at least equally well?
elrubio78 (2024-02-05 22:01:28+00:00): Yes, definitely! Thanks for pointing this out.
Glassman (2024-01-23 18:23:35+00:00): I take it from this edit and some others that you like sushi! Way to go.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146573597
Troyw125 (2024-01-24 15:00:47+00:00): Mostly just trying to update some of the changes and new stuff near the Lakewood Towncenter in Lakewood, WA.

Old Baskin Robbins location is now a Sushi place
A Domino's location moved
Old 7 eleven location is now a Domino's
pesticides (2024-01-23 00:27:43+00:00): I checked the Latah County parcel information, and this portion of the trail/railroad ROW is all owned by Latah County.
alexwohlbruck (2024-05-08 15:39:21+00:00): Hi, I have removed a couple of these cycle paths you added in this changeset. For roads with painted cycle shoulders, we use tags on the road to indicate them. Dedicated cycle paths will get their own ways.
VictorIE (2026-05-15 17:54:45+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1242098561

Typo in addr:street=Juniper Sqaure for 7 houses. 

Might the address actually be Juniper Rise?
jonnymccullagh (2026-05-15 20:49:57+00:00): fixed that type, thanks
JeroenHoek (2024-01-23 10:09:29+00:00): Waarom pas je dan ook niet de 'dead-end trap foot' aan die je nu laat staan?
arjunaraoc (2024-01-23 01:34:56+00:00): Sorry I meant shared node between admin boundary and a servicee road
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-21 21:40:16+00:00): What's the correct name of this street?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146574769
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-23 02:08:32+00:00): Do not "lollipop" areas by folding it back onto itself leaving just a sliver.  This is not correct.  I have corrected the instances at this golf course.  Multipolygon relations should be used instead.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146574890
izanagigsr (2024-05-26 07:15:14+00:00): que tal, las calles han sido liberadas el dia 25/05/2024
SootCanal (2024-05-29 04:11:48+00:00): Hello izanagigsr, thanks for reaching out about this! My resources are not quite up to date enough to make updates here. However If you have a resource, or new knowlege of the status of construction here, feel free to make the update! Have a nice day!

Hola izanagigsr, ¡gracias por comunicarte con esto! Mis recursos no están lo suficientemente actualizados como para realizar actualizaciones aquí. Sin embargo, si tiene un recurso o nuevos conocimientos sobre el estado de la construcción aquí, ¡no dude en realizar la actualización! ¡Que tenga un lindo día!
DUGA (2024-10-28 22:10:30+00:00): Why you add duplicate buildings ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1242103048/history/
skquinn (2024-10-30 01:29:31+00:00): I'm honestly not sure how the heck this happened; it has been fixed in changeset 158522084.
pza (2024-01-23 06:33:39+00:00): Hi, Are the trees still there? If so, they probably shouldn't be deleted.
William159919 (2024-01-23 20:55:23+00:00): I believe unless these are some very special trees all they will do is add unnecessary clutter visually when viewing this area. Are you implying we should mark every single tree everywhere you see?
fortera_au (2024-01-23 21:25:18+00:00): Adding any tree is perfectly fine as long as it exists, it's up to data consumers to filter out what they see as unnecessary. We don't expect a navigation app using OSM to use trees, but another type of map might. If you've just removed these because "unnecessary clutter" then this changeset should be reverted.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146575976
fortera_au (2024-01-26 00:43:58+00:00): I've reverted this changeset since everything indicated these were just removed to remove "clutter" in a specific rendering of OSM.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146693149
pza (2024-01-26 06:34:51+00:00): According to the OSM wiki, trees don't need to be "significant". If it is causing "unnecessary clutter" it is a problem with the renderer not the data source.  Take a look at ESRI's 3D tree layer for a good example of where this data is useful: https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=33383da8a75f4d24b4b6a0d0532abe6e
VoyagerFF (2024-01-23 03:08:55+00:00): Wrong hasthtag used, sorry. #YM2024PhilippinesPGIS. Previous buildings are now non-existent or had changed names (Raloy's, non-existent Tapa Master). Added a basketball court.
Glassman (2024-01-23 18:54:08+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

Just a couple of minor suggestions. Phone numbers in the US should start with +1- then the area code and phone number as you entered it.

Website URL should include http or https.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146576426
Glassman (2024-01-23 18:54:17+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146576472
Glassman (2024-01-23 18:54:34+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146576506
Glassman (2024-01-23 18:54:58+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146576563
MxxCon (2024-01-25 02:17:35+00:00): Hello.
could you please elaborate what are you are trying to map here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146576866
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 17:37:53+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11542167427/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop?
diwesser (2025-03-31 18:53:45+00:00): If i remember correctly, it was a specialized commercial building supply shop that sold various types of plastic pipes.
diwesser (2025-03-31 18:54:16+00:00): Found the website: https://northeastequipment.ca/
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-02 14:46:48+00:00): I added

shop=trade
trade=plumbing
plumbing=pipes
website=https://northeastequipment.ca/

feel free to revert/change
MxxCon (2024-01-25 02:18:52+00:00): Looks like you combined some road tags with a gift shop?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146577394
jmapb (2024-01-25 02:26:31+00:00): From a road in Ulster County, no less! I'm tempted to say it's a Go Map bug but more likely it was human error, somehow? Thanks for the heads up.
AkuAnakTimur (2024-01-23 15:36:26+00:00): Kena check balik kot... nanti jadi macam ni
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85471030
NeisBot (2024-01-23 07:48:56+00:00): Hi 강태완, welcome to OSM!

May we know the reason behind several mapped buildings?

Thanks.
rhtb0 (2024-01-23 14:46:26+00:00): https://tiles.osm.kr/#18/37.57500/126.97700
오픈스트리트맵 한국에서는 군부대가 노출되지 않는 지도를 공개하고 있습니다.
NeisBot (2024-01-23 15:01:21+00:00): @qgsc40
당신의 대답은 내 지시입니까, 아니면 이 변경 세트를 만든 사람의 지시입니까? 감사해요.
ForestFurnace (2024-01-23 05:07:09+00:00): Also used Clinton County Parcel Viewer: https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=15e7af1d52894f40960f41888cac220b
Ewen Hill (2024-01-23 11:26:36+00:00): Well done ryivhnn. The ID editor checks for minor issues and suggest changes from time to time to align with Wikidata which saves you the hassle. I did detach the commercial and residential areas from Dorothy street.as this had an acute angle where a node had been dragged but well done on a great edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146578217
ryivhnn (2024-01-23 12:44:11+00:00): Thanks! And thanks for fixing the residential and commercial areas, at this stage I'm too scared to touch anything larger than a big building (and even that's scary).