piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
seewäldler (2024-06-25 10:40:00+00:00): Hier war ich schon am zaudern.... das Stück jetzt ein befestigter (Schotter)Weg, der geht dann aber weiter das ganze Schulgebäude entlang bis fast zur Turnhalle als Rasengittersteine-Weg. Das ist vor einigen Jahren als hintere Zufahrt für Feuerwehrfahrzeuge angelegt worden zwischen Schulgebäude und Rotachdamm. Noexit wäre an dieser Stelle ziemlich sicher falsch, aber als einen richtigen Weg kann man die Rasengittersteine in der wie-auch-grad-immer-hohen Wiese nicht bezeichnen. Was könnte hier sinnvoll sein?
bxl-forever (2024-06-13 09:28:19+00:00): Note to the person in charge of this OnWheels teambuilding: Your latest edits have been much better, congrats.
But this node is a duplicate of an existing node here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4418284343
This is because Kings & Queens is a very unique type of business, which is probably invisible in the list of tags your app will show.
The recommended solution is to transfer data about your accessibility findings to the existing node and delete the one you have just added here.
Robin On Wheels (2024-06-14 13:44:09+00:00): Hey I am still checking the datasets from the teambuilding from yesterday, should be ok after the weekend. I check for double locations and transfer the entrance data to the correct node. We are improving the edit process from the app and add the missing types to the app if I see that it doesn't recognize a certain location. We also always use this teambuilding account when we do teambuildings. Makes it a bit easier to check afterwards. Thanks for the feedback. By the way some people said that they went into a shop to add the entrance data and the shops said other people already added it to our app. But in OSM all of the data from the first teambuildings were removed from the amenity nodes and transferred to the door nodes. The problem is that people in our app wil think this location has not been measured yet and try to add it again. Can we transfer the entrance data back to the amenity nodes? or at least copy them. In the future we will see if we can update the app to store the entrance tags to the door nodes. And write a script to transfer all the entrance tags to the main door nodes. Thx Robin
DD1GJ (2024-06-14 06:30:52+00:00): Änderungen komplett rückgängig gemacht.

Hallo mtbwilli, Du hattest Hausnummern verschoben und noch zweimal eine neue Straße über die bereits bestehende B 251 gelegt, siehe auch obige Warnungen. Bei OSM war bereits zuvor alles richtig eingetragen und die OSM-Router führen Fußgänger in keinem Fall über die Bundesstraße. Verschiebe den grünen Marker und schau die die Ergebnisse an.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=51.2858%2C8.6320%3B51.2761%2C8.6125#map=15/51.2831/8.6201

Wenn Google die Fußgänger über die Straße schickt, dann ist das kein Problem von OSM! Ebenso, wenn Fußgänger in ihrem Navi/App die Navigation für Autos verwenden. Weitere Hinweise, wie in OSM alles funktioniert, findest Du z.B. bei https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
silversurfer83 (2024-06-14 17:15:35+00:00): @DD1GJ danke für's Aufpassen :)
ist grad viel los auf der Karte...

@willi du hast eine Direktnachricht von mir :)

happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152622828
eggie (2024-06-13 10:39:51+00:00): Dag SMarik  De hoofdtag is leisure=playground.  Dit is alleen de specificatie.
MVG
eggie
BCNorwich (2024-06-13 10:57:52+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The recreation ground is within the area outline of the school, so it was correctly mapped. So I've retagged the recreation ground as such. Thus the rec is part of the school.

Regards Bernard
Greeny6000 (2024-06-13 11:11:07+00:00): Hi Bernard,

The meaning of

recreation ground (noun)
a piece of public land used for sports and games.

The school is not public land.  The area mapped out is the school sports field where the children play at lunchtime in the summer and have PE lessons.  This coming Monday and Tuesday, the school is holding a sports day. Let me know your thoughts on this.

Regards
Mark
BCNorwich (2024-06-13 16:51:07+00:00): Hi, Unfortunately the tag amenity/landuse=sports_field is not in use by OSM, the nearest tag descriptor is landuse=recreation_ground. The area could be tagged access=private to indicate no public use.

I don't mind what you tag it as as long as it is logical. You changed the tag to amenity=school. Tagging it as amenity=school within an area already tagged amenity=school is wrong, that's why I amended it.

Regards Bernard.
EdLoach (2024-12-23 10:08:38+00:00): The school wiki page seems to suggest leisure=recreation_ground (and although this has its own wiki page, the leisure=pitch wiki page says it is a tagging mistake and landuse=recreation_ground should be used instead). https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
Metzor (2024-06-13 18:53:35+00:00): Hi Urzum,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Nice to have you around improving the data :-)

Do you already know the wiki?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

There us plenty options to get in touch with the community:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Join_the_community

Your changeset popped up in a quality assurance tool, I frequently use.

You added a house in Romania and at the same time changed something in UK.
The change in UK was not on purpose, I guess, but this happens easily in iD, unfortunately. I will repair this, so no problem. Just take care next time :-)

That's the node you moved (and you merged the street with an underground stream), see the column with you user name:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/2110405572

Best regards 
Metzor
Metzor (2024-06-13 19:35:11+00:00): Moved node back to original position as was moved by accident.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152647656
bkil (2024-06-13 11:40:03+00:00): Hogy hívják a korábban Kismórichida névvel illetett leválasztott sarkot ami a Fenyő és Hunyadi utcát is tartalmazza? Sokszor az utcatáblákon is szerepel. A buszmegálló alapján még Szőlőhegy is lehet, de ezt csak helyileg lehetne jól megállapítani.
KovacsD (2024-06-13 11:59:20+00:00): Helyi lakos vagyok, legalábbi itt nőttem fel.
A történelmi falu régen Móriczhida volt, mely Kis- és Nagy-Móriczhidából állt. 
Kis-Mórichida a marcal felőli Kiss utca környéke, Nagy-Mórichida pedif a Fő utca környéke déli irányban, ami később épült be.
Eddig hibásan az észak-keleti területet nevezték térképen Kismórichidának, az a terület az ami legutoljára lett kiosztva, mérnökileg felosztott telkekkel, utcákkal. Falubeliek ezt "kültelek" néven illetik. De megjeleníteni értelmetlen. A Kis és Nagy rész is idejétmúlt, mert egy falu van.
CorruptComputer (2024-07-02 20:53:04+00:00): Looks like a section of this bus route was deleted in this changeset.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3969349#map=17/29.76465/-95.37034
kmarkish_lyft (2024-07-04 15:34:32+00:00): Hi, CorruptComputer!
My name is Kate, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. 
Many thanks for letting me know about my mistake. I have already restored broken relation in changeset -   https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153488007
Sorry for that and for any inconvenience these edits may have caused.  
Best regards, Kate
LateNightTone (2026-05-25 15:31:15+00:00): Hi ramthelinefeed, I see a couple of years ago you created relation/17712258 and relation/17712369. Since then, note 4910984 has been created by a anonymous user suggesting that the track between Green Road and Ardmore Road doesn't connect. A cursory check on streetview doesn't show a track in that position, biut imagery is from 2011.

Would you mind confirming? It might be that the track needs to be truncated, and the walking and cycle routes removed from that stretch.
ramthelinefeed (2026-05-25 15:39:25+00:00): I mapped that bit working from an FOI to the Council re public rights of way. I haven't visited it to see it with my own eyes. It's not without precedent in NI that local landowners unlawfully block PRoW's and even try to edit online maps to corroborate themselves. ;-)
eggie (2024-06-13 10:27:22+00:00): Dag SMapper

Probeer te voorkomen dat je de paden aan de landuse vastplakt. Ik heb je pad weer losgemaakt.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=152624102
MVG
eggie
Barroszt (2024-06-13 09:46:05+00:00): Usunięcie bezsensownej nazwy tego nieistniejącego parkingu rowerowego.
Barroszt (2024-06-13 09:53:47+00:00): Przywrócono tag fee.
eggie (2024-06-13 10:37:53+00:00): Dag SMapper.. Probeer de paden los te houden van de landuse. Ik heb wat losgemaakt.
De linker alttoets voorkomt plakken bij intekenen.
MVG
eggie
NicaTopo (2024-06-13 13:28:45+00:00): Hi Jajanine,
OSM maps are used for many applications in real life. Your additions are vandalism. Please stop.
Thank you.
literan (2024-06-13 17:44:32+00:00): здесь вроде дома уже построены, может, не proposed? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1292041032
anastasia_ (2024-06-13 19:05:43+00:00): построены, да, но нет ни одного подтверждения (ни фоток норм двора, ни панорам), что расположено там, где оно есть на самом деле, и что геометрия именно такая(
Alexey Vazhnov (2024-06-14 10:44:48+00:00): Please use smaller regions for a changeset(s).
Metzor (2024-06-13 18:35:25+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for cleaning up but why is the geographical size so big if you just delete 100 nodes?

Best regards
Metzor
SomeoneElse (2024-06-14 11:15:10+00:00): It looks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1227778538/history has already been deleted and restored once.  What investigation did you do to make sure that it really should be deleted, and not added to some way or relation, or left for future mapping?
literan (2024-06-13 19:02:34+00:00): кривой формат адрески. Надо ставить пробел перед буквами "к", "с", "вл"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
comfyquiettree (2024-06-14 09:48:22+00:00): *Václava :D
eggie (2024-06-13 11:05:16+00:00): Dag KJ  Wanneer staat aangegeven dat het Verboden Toegang is dan lijkt het mij correct getagd. 
Waarom de Kasteelbrug hier alleen een officieel fietspad is komt me wel vreemd voor.
Is dat niet ook gewoon een highway=service?
MVG
eggie
KJ77777 (2024-06-13 13:39:19+00:00): Ja het is zeker verboden toegang. Dat fietspad klopt niet inderdaad. Kan ik gewoon dingen van anderen wijzigen? Ofwel: dat fietspad op de brug aanpassen ?
eggie (2024-06-13 13:54:59+00:00): Gewoon aanpassen.. source= local_knowledge
Mapse
ceirios (2024-06-13 11:19:36+00:00): Hi MarkCooper,

It's never a good idea when contributing data, such as addresses, to specify that it belongs to you (or anyone you know) for privacy reasons.

See this Wiki page on making good changeset comments:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Cheers and happy mapping,
Ceirios
silversurfer83 (2024-06-14 22:00:20+00:00): Moin :)

was soll uns dieser Name hier denn sagen? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/451201652

Grüße

(und auch mal auf eine Antwort hoffend)
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152626303
literan (2024-06-13 19:01:34+00:00): кривой формат адрески. Надо ставить пробел перед буквами "к", "с", "вл"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
MxxCon (2024-06-18 06:25:39+00:00): Hello.
Please don't forget to include this tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:street_vendor%3Dyes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152626535
mini-me (2024-06-13 17:13:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1116345609
Не может связка с трафиком 1.5 машины в день иметь такой высокий статус. Даже на выезде из жилой зоны где-нибудь в новостройках это выглядит сомнительно, а уж тут...
Константин Гам (2024-06-13 18:06:35+00:00): Статусы ставят не за трафик же только.
А нужен он для корректной навигации на разворот. Мапили так десяток лет и вдруг что-то поменялось, внезапно)

Лучше вместе гоняния тегов туда-сюда, выйдите на местность, нарисуйте что-то новое.
TrickyFoxy (2024-06-13 18:32:18+00:00): А в Москве наоборот мапили и мапят. И кто же прав?
mini-me (2024-06-13 19:26:16+00:00): Ни один вменяемый роутер не будет делать тут разворот. Только если рядом начальная или конечная точка маршрута. Но для этого достаточно service, максимум unclassified.
Вы просто в вики десяток лет не заглядывали, а там про линки уже давно написано: 
> съезды на развязках дорог с той же важностью в дорожной сети
И что это за "съезд", который появляется только когда дорога нарисована двумя веями?
Константин Гам (2024-06-13 20:51:22+00:00): Сервис не соглашусь, все таки сквозные проезды через сервис имеют огромный пенальти. 
Против анклава ничего не имею)
silversurfer83 (2024-06-14 22:01:53+00:00): Kannst du Barrieren bitte realistisch mit Lücken erfassen? Diese Häuser sind mit 100%er Sicherheit nicht komplett ohne Lücke und Tor eingezäunt!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152626842
southglos (2024-10-29 23:42:00+00:00): Hi.  Just looking at this one - this appears to be a bridleway with a public right of way.  Any comment or anything I should be aware of before changing foot/bicycle/horse from 'private' back to 'designated'?
synapse-roar (2024-06-14 18:58:19+00:00): Looks good to me
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152627680
SomeoneElse (2024-08-26 11:23:57+00:00): Hello,
In this changeset you've removed the previous indications that this is actually a public bridleway.  Have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/582702738/history and you'll see what I mean.
What I'd suggest that you do here is to contact the previous mappers and ask there if there was a public bridleway fingerpost here.  Likely there was, and if so a "designation=public_bridleway" tag should be added.
The change to "highway=service" or "highway=track" makes sense based on the imagery, but only after the designation is correctly mapped.
Best Regards,
Andy
Misa_zumba (2024-08-27 06:55:15+00:00): As you recommended, I reached out to Futura69 to clarify whether there is a bridleway sign.
Monty Hills (2024-06-13 22:44:22+00:00): This path no longer exists. It comes from the old Horswold houses demolished during the 1950's if you were to walk here today you would be on a field.
Mxdanger (2024-06-13 11:13:57+00:00): Project: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Orange_County,_California/OCTA
Frans S (2024-06-17 11:37:51+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
However, Mapping high rise building need to be mapped on a specific way, See attachment.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152628239
mappinglander (2024-06-13 12:18:41+00:00): Hello,
according to another official file sourced from HGM (https://www.harita.gov.tr/urun/turkiye-ve-cevresi-cografi-ad-dizini-turkce-xls/183), the name seems to be noted as "Curali". Google says so, too. and not even that, I've checked the official gazette and it's clearly "Curali" as late as 2012. (https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2012/12/20121206-1.htm) Are you really sure that it isn't a typo?
though all that being said, i've just checked and HGM imagery overlay lists as Curalı, so it should be incorrectly written there i suppose?
zelenol (2024-06-13 17:29:03+00:00): Hello! I apologize, I double-checked the data: the symbol was specified incorrectly, I am correcting the data. Thanks for your feedback.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152628313
eggie (2024-06-13 11:48:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Volgens de wiki is het zo correct.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
literan (2024-06-13 18:13:07+00:00): кривой формат адрески. Надо ставить пробел перед буквами "к", "с", "вл"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
Andrew Kvalheim (2024-06-26 02:57:38+00:00): This change applied sidewalk=left to the missing section, but it previously (way 1064471021) had sidewalk=right.
Andrew Kvalheim (2024-06-26 03:13:16+00:00): It also missed the reconnection of crossing nodes 6902505427 and 9938424611.
vrynkevich_lyft (2024-06-26 11:04:17+00:00): Hi, Andrew Kvalheim ! My name is Veranika and I am a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you so much for paying attention to this. 
That is definitely a mistake. I apologize for the oversight in fixing the road. Thank you for pointing it out and for your contribution to OSM!
Best regards, Veranika!
synapse-roar (2024-06-14 18:56:55+00:00): Looks good to me
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152629035
martinst (2024-06-13 15:31:13+00:00): Dieser Weg hat kein surface=compacted, was wegen tracktype=grade4 auch naheliegend ist.
schenklklopfer (2024-06-13 17:07:34+00:00): Hallo,
der alte Eintrag war "forest_soil", und das gibt es nicht. Das ist so etwas wie Waldweg, und was dem nach dem Wiki am nächsten kommt ist eben "compacted", da steht: "State of the art centreline crowned water bound surface=compacted forest track with drainage ditches." (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dcompacted)

Man könnte auch "ground" verwenden (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dground) oder "mud", wenns ganz matschig ist, aber das alles ist halt weit weg von dem originalen "forest_soil".

Aber klar, wenn du lokales wissen hast, dann ändere es bitte auf etwas, das mehr der Realität entspricht.
martinst (2024-10-06 16:25:29+00:00): Ich habe den Fahrweg bearbeitet in Changeset 157548300. der Weg wechselt im hinteren Abschnitt ständig von Kies zu Schlamm usw.
Habe dort "ground" verwendet.
eggie (2024-06-13 11:50:00+00:00): Volgens de wiki zou het oke zijn. Je kunt ook contact met de voorgaande mapper opnemen.
Die gebruikt de data van ProRail.
MVG
eggie
ivanbranco (2024-06-13 14:17:19+00:00): Hi donovaly, I saw you are adding lot of wikipedia links in Tirana. If it's not a big problem could you adapt your workflow to add the values without underscores? From the wiki: "Use the human readable title of the article, for example 'en:St Paul's Cathedral' rather than the version with underscores"

Thanks and good mapping
eggie (2024-06-13 11:58:27+00:00): Dag Nick   'k Denk beter alleen de node gebruiken en niet nog een keer een lijnelement.
De zebra heb ik al toegevoegd aan de node.
MVG
eggie
Luz R Finley (2024-06-14 15:09:08+00:00): Does "SIGNAL IDUNA PARK" need to be all caps?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152629708
stadiaarcadia (2024-06-15 04:19:11+00:00): It is the official writing style.
mueschel (2024-06-15 10:37:28+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the meaning of the tag "lane driving =Right"? Do you really drive on the right hand side of the road here?
mavl (2024-06-22 11:38:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 153025651, 153025658, 153025634, 153025596, 153025615, 153025678 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources].
eggie (2024-06-13 14:22:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
gscholz (2024-06-15 06:23:23+00:00): Hi Brentar,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-80.26944&lat=-3.49757&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=152630732

Especially way 121133163 is affected here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121133163#map=15/-3.4987/-80.2710

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Brentar (2024-06-17 12:26:29+00:00): Hi gscholz,

Thank you for the valuable feedback. After fixing the overlapping building errors, I accidentally selected landuse polygon and used shortcut key "q" which resulted in data regression I have made the corrections.
Rngrk (2024-06-14 17:39:46+00:00): 上传前请记得检查要素类型，1292083235已修改
pbnoxious (2024-06-23 11:35:43+00:00): Hi, die Änderungen am Surface-Tag haben es jetzt ja weniger genau als vorher gemacht, vorher war klar, dass hier nur die Fahrspuren gepflastert sind, jetzt würde man den ganzen Weg als gepflastert erwarten.
Tagging mit ":lanes" ist zwar außerhalb von "concrete:lanes" wenig verbreitet, aber es war hier vorher nicht "falsch" sondern eben tatsächlich selten / schlecht dokumentiert.

Würde das wieder zurück ändern. Da "paved" auch sehr unspezifisch ist, schaffe ich es vielleicht auch mal vor Ort nachzuschauen was da genau für Boden ist.
ObscureAngel (2024-10-09 09:31:27+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre contribution :)

Pour moi tout est en ordre, je valide vos changements.

Bonne journée et bonne cartographie :)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152631556
4004 (2024-06-15 23:24:25+00:00): здравствуйте, Kate. 
наверное, это все же не аналог ЦУМа (department store)..
kate_rocketdata (2024-06-17 10:28:41+00:00): Добрый день!
Вы правы, извините за допущенную ошибку.
Верная категория для магазина Три цены shop: variety_store
Исправим!
4004 (2024-06-17 10:41:07+00:00): да, точно, я по ошибке супермаркет поставил. спасибо
Luzandro (2024-07-05 04:45:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4319443
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152631844
Mxdanger (2024-06-14 05:27:48+00:00): Thanks for updating it. Notes were closed en masse by a now blocked user.
eggie (2024-06-13 14:28:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
bicycle=yes hoort niet op een wandelpad. Het pad eindigt ook op een wandelpad en niet op een fietspad.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-13 13:02:51+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 152430960, 152546957.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-14 22:15:43+00:00): Hi. This is shown as a single building, that you've marked as a school, but it's shown as having 2 roads running through it! Bing imagery shows that it's actually 3 separate unconnected buildings. Could you please fix them? Thanks!
Dawid2849 (2024-06-13 13:44:59+00:00): tak jest według GDDKiA. Dodam official_name
:-} (2024-06-13 17:29:09+00:00): To GDDKiA ma błędne informacje, bo tu NIE ma węzła Powązkowska, tylko jest Marymoncka, dlatwgo name=Marymoncka jest tu poprawne
Dawid2849 (2024-06-13 17:31:24+00:00): Przecież nie ruszałem name po Twojej poprawce