piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
AmyCupcake (2023-08-04 17:39:29+00:00): With help from local source
tntchn (2023-08-04 17:55:56+00:00): 趁台南榮家都更前把建築物畫一畫留作紀念，台南都發局網站也有更詳細的記錄：https://udweb.tainan.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=17102&s=7663099
Supaplex (2023-08-08 10:22:07+00:00): 我好像也對高雄205廠做過類似的事情，但感覺205廠要遷建然後原有的地要開發還得一段時間
acsd (2023-08-05 06:55:40+00:00): Привет! Не следует добавлять тег amenity=parking на подземные парковки. Достаточно указать amenity=parking_entrance на въезде, и теги связанные с парковкой указывать на ней.
Руслан Т (2023-08-05 08:40:18+00:00): Привет, отредактирую, как только буду у компьютера, спасибо)
Frans S (2023-08-05 11:43:43+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139451975
JesseFTW (2024-04-26 14:21:31+00:00): I am trying to decide how to tag paired oneway signs, as you did in this edit. I've opened a discussion of this here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:MUTCD/R#Handling_paired_oneway_signs_(R6-1R_and_R6-1L) 

I'd love your thoughts.
chris210990 (2023-08-07 07:09:58+00:00): Schönen guten Tag,

bitte ändere keine Gebäudenamen mehr auf dem Werkgelände. Da diese offiziel laut Baubescheid und dem Brandschutzgutachten so lauten. Somit sind es die Namen der Gebäude und keine Referenz.
Des weiteren benötigen wir diese auch in unserem Gefahrenmanagementsystem wo die Karte von OpenStreetMap angezeigt wird.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Chris von der Site Security
hk51 (2023-08-07 12:54:22+00:00): Guten Tag,
Bezeichnungen in Baubescheiden und Brandschutzgutachten sind noch lange keine Namen. Gebäude auf Werksgelände sind in der Regel immer ref.
Und sollte Euer Gefahrenmanagementsystem mit ref nicht klar kommen sollte evtl. die Software angepasst werden, nicht OpenStreetMap.

MfG
hk51
chris210990 (2023-08-07 18:12:51+00:00): Hallo,
ich zitiere einmal OpenStreetMap Wiki. 
„ name=* wird verwendet, um den Namen von Dingen anzugeben. Wir erfassen so Namen von Straßen, Kneipen, Bahnhöfen, Parks, Gebäuden und allem, was einen Namen hat“
Bitte beachte den letzten Teil „ Gebäuden und allem, was einen Namen hat“. 
Somit ist es vollkommen in Ordnung wenn wir die Gebäude Nummern in das Attribut Feld „name“ schreiben. Da diese Nummern auch die offiziellen Namen sind und jedes Gebäude mit Schildern so Markiert ist. 

Link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen

Viele Grüße 
Chris
hk51 (2023-08-07 20:54:50+00:00): ich zitiere auch mal:
"Das name-Attribut sollte nur den eigentlichen Namen des fraglichen Objekts enthalten und keine Kategorien / Typen, Beschreibungen, Nummern/Referenzen, Adressen oder Anmerkungen enthalten."
Beachte den Teil "Nummern/Referenzen". Auch wenn an jedem Gebäude ein Schild mit der Nummer hängt bleibt es eine Gebäudenummer, also ref

MfG
hk51
chris210990 (2023-08-12 17:46:52+00:00): Hast du auch eine gute Stelle zitiert. In  unseren Fall gibt es einen spezifischen Kontext, in dem diese Zahlenkombination als eindeutige Identifikation für etwas dient. Das ist die Definition von einem Namen. Somit werden die NAMEN der Gebäude auch bei dem Tag name eingetragen und nicht bei ref. ref ist zum Beispiel bei 361-363 die Bezeichnung BIO 4. 

Viele Grüße Chris
Map-Peter (2023-09-03 23:49:08+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name
 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref
 
@ hk51  
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/benutzung-vom-tag-name-eigenname/103400
burrscurr (2023-08-13 14:28:07+00:00): Am Bahnhof Breitengüßbach gab es railway=platform-Duplikate die ich nicht bemerkt hatte und dann versehentlich die railway=platform, die in den Routenrelationen enthalten war, getrennt und verändert habe. Dadurch sind einige PT-Routen kaputt gegangen. Die Fehler sollten in changeset/139826968 behoben sein.
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-05 17:05:09+00:00): I took a look at the edits.  It looks pretty good.  Keep up the good work.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139453237
Rainero (2023-08-06 18:47:50+00:00): Hallo Felix Edelmann,

dieser Änderungssatz hat denselben Inhalt wie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139453541 . Dadurch waren die Objekte doppelt vorhanden. Ich habe diesen Änderungssatz daher revertiert.

Servus,
Rainer
Felix Edelmann (2023-08-06 21:12:03+00:00): Korrekt. Nach dem Speichern hab ich noch etwas bearbeiten wollen und iD meinte dann, ich hätte noch ungespeicherte Änderungen, die ich erst speichern solle. Dann war der Changeset zweimal drin
eggie (2023-08-05 15:10:17+00:00): Dit zou ook oke moeten zijn.
user_8655426 (2023-08-05 00:22:58+00:00): こんにちは。
変更セットのコメントに「送電線の名称は、電力系統図【新潟県(2次系)】を参照」とありますが、この系統図の下の方に「転載禁止」と書かれています。 

https://nw.tohoku-epco.co.jp/consignment/system/announcement/pdf/ni1.pdf

この資料は OpenStreetMap のデータソース(情報源)として適切なものでしょうか？
fūrai-bō_ (2023-08-05 05:56:16+00:00): ファイル自体の転載は禁止と書かれていますが、送電線の「名称」の利用が禁止とは書かれていないことを確認しており、実際名称の公開がこのデータソースの目的だろうと考えると、名称を使うこと自体は特に問題にはならないだろうと判断しました。
ただ、意見として採用すべきでないが趨勢となるのであれば今後は使用しない選択肢もあるだろうとは思いますが、そうなると今後東北電力における送電線の名称を書くのは難しくなりそうですし、正確性を期すことも同様に困難になるかと思います。
user_8655426 (2023-08-05 07:37:01+00:00): 返信、ありがとうございます。
OSMで利用可能なデータソース、情報収集方法などについては、以下のページでご確認ください。

利用可能なデータソース
https://openstreetmap.jp/node/764

データの情報源
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Beginners_Guide_1.1

JA:著作権
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:著作権 

JA:Legal FAQ
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Legal_FAQ

私の意見は「採用すべきでない。」です。名称などの情報をOSMに入力したいのであれば、現地調査をすべきです。またはデータ所有者の許可を得るべきです。
チェンジセット・ディスカッションはコミュニティに公開されていますので、他のマッパーさんの意見を待ちたいと思います。
fūrai-bō_ (2023-08-05 08:44:43+00:00): ご意見については了承いたしました。
このPDFをソースとして使用したのは今回の一連のコミットが初ですが、念のため付け加えますと、「名前」や記号番号の類については著作物ではないため著作権は生じませんので、送電線名をOSMで使用するに際しても権利問題が生じることはないと判断しています。もし名称に著作権があるとなると、現地調査して送電塔のラベルから送電線名を確認しても同じ問題が生じることになってしまいますが、著作権がそもそもないため現にこれまでも問題は起こっておらず今後もそうあり続けることが期待されています。

またデータソースにある図も送電線の配線を把握するのに重要な根拠として今後使おうと考えていたところですが、PDFのそれは概念図ですし、実際に線を引く時は背景を「国土地理院 全国最新写真(シームレス)」として送電塔を一つずつ追いながら実施していてそれ以外の何かを複写するような作業でもないですから、権利問題にはならないと判断をしています。

ですので、今後も同様の更新を実施することは予定していますが、後から検出可能なように今回と同様に情報源として名称及びURLは付けるようにしたいと考えております。
syntex (2024-04-20 12:36:16+00:00): Skleiłeś zagospodarowanie terenu i granicę z ciekiem wodnym. Dodałeś granicę jako część relacji Raszynki. Ten zestaw zmian został wycofany.
zstadler (2023-08-07 10:12:45+00:00): Thanks for fixing the tagging!
The new tags are correct.

In the future, you may simplify things by using just 2 tags:
1. "access=yes" sets the default
2. "motor_vehicle=no" sets the exception

Thanks,
Zeev
user_5359 (2023-08-06 06:54:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Has this form of labelling been agreed with the OSM project? G as in Google? Only capital letters? Minus sign as word separator? You are free to note facts, but importing private markers (only to be used and maintained by you) is not standard procedure.
tekim (2024-03-05 01:26:21+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.  For legal reasons we are not allowed to use Google Street View when editing OpenStreetMap
dpolovinkin (2023-09-20 08:31:51+00:00): hi, way 1194852190 that you added recently - noticed that there is no building there, checked personally, it's just a small pedestrian zone near parking, wanted to ask is it okay to remove it, and secondly - where the address Dorf 4 came from for this place, if there is no building there?
nomimono (2023-09-21 18:13:26+00:00): Thank you for your observation. I tried to map systematically all the buildings of Wildhaus with the aerial photo and the adresses after the Amtliche Vermessung from the Canton of St.Gallen. The "building" you are talking about has the offical adress Dorf 4 (see https://www.geoportal.ch/ktsg/map/40?y=2744760.33&x=1229774.56&scale=500&rotation=0 ). It's a long time ago I was in Wildhaus, so your local knowledge is very likely better. Feel free to improve Openstreetmap to the best of one's knowledge and belief.
dpolovinkin (2023-09-21 21:20:29+00:00): thanks for answer, got it! :)
MKnight (2023-09-11 10:50:52+00:00): Moin, Du hast an der ratsstrasse maxspeed=10 eingetragen. Ich habe es wieder entfernt.
Siehe auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dliving_street#Verwendung_in_Deutschland
SejBo01 (2023-09-18 20:04:41+00:00): danke
adrianojbr (2023-08-05 17:33:00+00:00): Maps11, no Brasil temos uma proposta de classificação viária aprovada: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/Classifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_rodovias_do_Brasil.

As vias em Bombinhas já estão de acordo com a regra atual, sendo o acesso principal classificada como secondary e o acesso alternativo como tertiary.

Por isso, reverti esse changeset e, por favor, antes de efetuar alterações de classificação de vias discuta com a comunidade local via fórum ou telegram.

Abraço!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139455437
sampeto (2023-08-05 13:50:43+00:00): Hallo fratzzz
Danke für deine Ergänzungen. Könntest du bitte in Zukunft deine Changesets mit Kommentaren versehen? Diese sind für andere Mapper:innen sehr hilfreich, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Gruss, sampeto
fratzzz (2023-08-08 16:25:13+00:00): Hallo sampeto
Ja klar, das kann ich in Zukunft machen. Vielen Dank für den Hinweis. LG
Jan Olieslagers (2023-08-21 02:35:19+00:00): I do not think we can consider this an aerodrome, not even an airstrip, given the lack of a marked out runway, or any other infrastructure. After all, there must be hundreds of places in Europe where aeroplanes occasionally operate even if there is totally no infrastructure. I therefore intend to remove this entry.
marcel3032 (2023-08-21 05:05:25+00:00): yeah, I see. I wasn't sure if that node should be in OSM, because of reasons you wrote. 

And now, when we are talking about that, I found airstrip in openaip: https://www.openaip.net/data/airports/6261506acb27f425094628e2
marcel3032 (2023-08-21 05:06:44+00:00): (it still doesn't mean anything, it's just another open data source, so if you still think that we should remove this entry, we can remove it)
Jan Olieslagers (2023-08-21 09:03:28+00:00): Ok, I will then proceed to remove it. Regarding openairports: I think it is a sisterproject of OSM, and builds upon the same database.  Thanks for quick and polite reply! Kindly from Potugal,
Strubbl (2023-09-29 21:43:08+00:00): Hi, du hast in Version 4 von https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7949860084 den Döner in eine Toilette umgewandelt. So schlecht schmeckt der da nicht. 😂 Ich mach das mal rückgängig mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141931696
Eisenspleiszer (2023-11-01 20:33:30+00:00): Hi Strubbl, sorry und vielen Dank für die Berichtigung. Die Änderung war selbstverständlich ein Versehen. Ich wollte eigentlich nur die Toilette erfassen.
secondaryhighway (2023-09-04 00:48:03+00:00): Hi, you seem to have mapped these buildings with the tag building=yes45.84050/5.21807
is this a mistake or did you mean to set those tags?
thepriben (2023-09-04 05:59:01+00:00): Hi,
Yeah a mistake, a bad copy and paste.  Thanks for telling me. Seems you fixed that, is it?
Thanks again:)
secondaryhighway (2023-09-04 14:14:36+00:00): Hey, 
I decided to wait for you to respond in any case it wasn't a mistake, but I fixed them in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140808002 right now.
felipeeugenio (2023-08-04 22:01:29+00:00): buena
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139456957
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-04 20:40:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11090431005

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
AgusQui (2023-08-12 00:11:30+00:00): Por favor solo agregar datos si estás seguro que existen en la realidad, no copiar de otros datos. Este comentario viene por esta parada que agregaste en Merlo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11090419924 no existe, ni si quiera pasa por ahí el 136.
map per (2023-08-05 05:23:40+00:00): Hallo vsaw,

gibt es Klenze-Service (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5137817855) hier noch?

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
vsaw (2023-08-05 07:44:34+00:00): Hi,

ja den gibt es noch.

Lg
map per (2023-08-05 17:52:25+00:00): Ok, danke
ivanbranco (2023-08-05 00:25:00+00:00): why deleting the runway area instead of changing it with area:aeroway=runway as the wiki suggests?
Jan Olieslagers (2023-08-05 10:46:27+00:00): Because I am vehemently opposed to that suggestion - there have been various discussions. None countered my arguments, yet few agreed with me. For me, the aera:aeroway=runway should not exist, it is a waste of resources and a source of confusion. I will not stop other people from using it, but you cannot expect me to use it myself :)
Aranc (2023-08-10 21:47:18+00:00): ove platforme su okrenute prema rotoru, vraćena je nova-stara regulacija prometa i dvosmjerni promet do pazara
Badojo (2023-08-10 23:33:51+00:00): Aha pardon, mislio sam da je drugčija regulacija jer je bilo promijenjeno prije par godina
Frans S (2023-08-05 11:40:58+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
A: Not accurately drawn.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapping them as 1 building.
E. Buildings not squared.
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
* Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139457735
Frans S (2023-08-05 11:41:32+00:00): In addition to previous comment ( no room left)
You mapped a parking space as a building.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139457735
Glassman (2023-08-11 16:56:38+00:00): The roads you marked as private are privately owned but are open for public use. You can add a tag operator= with the name of the organization responsible for maintaining the roads. Also - the name of the road is just Valleybrook Lane. Adding private rd will only confuse routers.

Please review your edit and correct as needed.

I'll send you more info on OSM in a DM
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139457738
MxxCon (2023-08-04 21:59:30+00:00): Hello.
Crosswalks controlled by traffic lights should be tagged as crossing=traffic_signals, not crossing=marked...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139457868
VLD157 (2023-08-07 15:13:55+00:00): Hi MxxCon, 
Thank you for reaching out to bring this to my attention. I'll keep it in mind going forward. The crossings at this intersection are updated now with the traffic_signals tag.
Awoobis (2023-08-04 21:18:11+00:00): Hmm. Geometria budynku zasłania ścieżki (w poprzedniej wersji dworca nie zasłaniała). Możliwe że zaraz dam rewert
nurdafur (2025-02-03 16:19:24+00:00): Hi Matthijs
In this changeset you splitted the mainroad through Gommiswald. You forgot to fix the cycleroute on this segments afterwards. I just fix that now. Please be attentive when splitting ways.
Cheers and have fun continuing mapping 
Urs
Matthijs Kooijman (2025-02-04 11:49:45+00:00): w00ps, I am aware, but apparently I forgot to check here. Thanks for the feedback and the fix!
marczoutendijk (2023-11-13 14:19:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1194865076
bridge=1?
What is the meaning of that?
felipeeugenio (2023-11-13 15:22:55+00:00): it is a typo. ill correct it. thanks
Awoobis (2023-08-04 21:59:23+00:00): Hmm. Corridory są najwyrazniej nierenderowane. A szkoda.
osmuser63783 (2024-01-20 09:16:30+00:00): You've recently modified this way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/566039), do you have anything to add about this note?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/566039

If the cycling infrastructure is now mapped correctly here it could be closed?
ndm (2024-01-20 15:19:39+00:00): I was on foot and not taking notes of cycle infrastructure - be great if you could do a proper survey.
osmuser63783 (2024-01-20 15:43:10+00:00): Thanks! I'm nowhere near Bristol unfortunately. Just browsing the map for notes where the thing they're asking to be mapped has already been mapped, which is surprisingly common!
Shaun das Schaf (2023-08-06 20:10:02+00:00): Hallo furgas,

ich kann dein Problem reproduzieren. GraphHopper hat zum Beispiel dieses Problem. Die anderen Router OSRM und Valhalla machen es besser und wollen erst in Minseln wenden.

Deine Änderungen helfen allerdings vermutlich nicht. Ich habe noch eine Abbiegebeschränkung hinzugefügt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16167144

Diese sollte das Wenden an dieser Stelle verhindern. Es kann allerdings eine Weile dauern, bis die Routingdaten aktualisiert werden und diese Beschränkung beachtet wird.

Bei Gelegenheit kann ich auch mal noch einen Bugreport bei GraphHopper für dieses Problem erstellen:
https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
furgas (2023-08-07 16:23:17+00:00): Vielen Dank Shaun das Schaf für die fundierte Erklärung!
Shaun das Schaf (2023-08-07 17:08:12+00:00): Mal schauen ob etwas passiert:
https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/2861
djsa (2023-08-04 21:41:05+00:00): http://www.landarchitecten.be/projecten/sociale-woningbouw/lolanden-fase-1/
MxxCon (2023-08-04 22:01:45+00:00): Shouldn't it be "Company" and not "Co"? Their website and logo mentions the full word
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139459333
akadouri (2023-08-04 22:16:34+00:00): The signs (second location https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7006950444) in front both say "Co" but I guess that may be just to save space and the logo design. I could move "Co" to alt_name for search to pick it up.

Park Slope: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=40.680883&lng=-73.975127&z=17&pKey=889981138230781&focus=photo&x=0.4870902047651614&y=0.5564595445779186&zoom=0

WBurg: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=40.713923&lng=-73.959976&z=17&pKey=242316814358954&focus=photo
puchaczowsky (2023-08-07 23:29:12+00:00): why did you mark the viaduct as under construction when it is already finished?
matthiam (2023-08-08 06:51:55+00:00): Thanks for reviewing my changeset, did you see the note for the updated bridge?
puchaczowsky (2023-08-08 10:40:54+00:00): yes, but currently it doesn't make sense and the previous tagging was correct
syntex (2024-06-10 09:41:36+00:00): Jakie jest źródło Wyspa Miłości dla wyspy Mała Żuławka?
Anas masuris (2024-06-10 09:49:10+00:00): Wszystkie źródła są podlinkowane - sailforum i PRNG, plus "małe" wywiady z mieszkańcami
syntex (2024-06-10 14:44:09+00:00): ok
Nailui (2023-08-05 07:47:41+00:00): It has been added to the map?
felipeeugenio (2023-08-06 16:48:04+00:00): Hola Gerardo. En las imágenes que usaste no aparecen estas casas, estos dibujos son esquemáticos y además ni siquiera están cuadrados (lo que puedes hacer en el editor con la letra Q).
Es importante velar por la calidad de los dibujos y no mapear solo para rellenar espacio.
Te pido por favor dar respuestas a las consultas que se te hacen ya que hay una comunidad de gente detrás de esto e intentamos cuidar lo que hemos hecho.
No obstante estos comentarios que te hago, es importante destacar que los errores que puedas estar cometiendo son comunes en quienes comienzan y nuestra intención es ayudarte. Hay varios bomberos en la comunidad y gente que vive ecerca de Curanilahue con la que pueden colaborar. Puedes unirte al chat de la comunidad en Telegram (app muy similar a whatsapp) en el link https://t.me/OSMcl
Ahí resolveremos todas y cada una de tus dudas.
Saludos y nos vemos
felipeeugenio (2023-08-06 17:00:03+00:00): Lamentablemente un vecino tuyo hace varios año no te dejó un buen ejemplo de como se hacen las cosas y repartió polígonos por todos lados. No todo está mal, pero en varias ocasiones hizo sobresimplificaciones que deberían ser corregidas.

saludos
Gerardo Bazaes (2023-08-07 23:25:51+00:00): Hola Felipe, te comento y a ver si me puedes ayudar para corregirlo si no para eliminar las áreas. Lo que pasa es que la imagen satelital no es actualizada en ese punto existe una nueva población, el trazado lo hice con GPS y sobre él dibujé las calles que corresponden. Sin embargo, al no tener imagen satelital actualizada intenté, respecto a las casas que si hay, hacer una estimación con las áreas que dibuje. En resumen, las calles están correctas pues esta hecho con GPS pero las áreas dibujadas son estimación.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139461132
felipeeugenio (2023-08-08 11:57:55+00:00): Hola Gerardo, Aprecio tu honestidad.
Pero no "tienes" que dibujarlas si no hay imagenes satelitales. Está ok lo que hiciste con el GPS y las calles las dejé, sin embargo , para las casas vamos a tener que esperar a que hayan imágenes satelitales. No es urgente.
Gerardo Bazaes (2023-08-08 15:40:44+00:00): Ningún problema, muchas gracias por los comentarios, se aprecia la ayuda y sigo aprendiendo. Ya ingresé también al grupo de Telegram!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139461132
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-05 16:52:23+00:00): Landcover shouldn't overlap, such as the fairway and the green.  One should be fully within the other, or they should be snapped to each other.

The issue is that the renderer and database has no clue which is "on top" of the other.

Example one that has been fixed:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1194877604
avinet_ua (2023-08-04 23:58:59+00:00): fix wikipedia links
avinet_ua (2023-08-05 01:30:42+00:00): reverted coz of this is broken changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139462462
avinet_ua (2023-08-05 01:31:44+00:00): reverted coz of this is broken changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139462484#map=7/53.723/27.902
avinet_ua (2023-08-05 01:32:41+00:00): reverted as this is broken changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139462517
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-25 17:36:21+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16161101/history has waterway = creek that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by waterway=creek? Is not using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream intentional and wanted here? How waterway=creek differs from waterway=stream in this case?
Timmy_Tesseract (2024-05-19 07:07:14+00:00): Waterway=stream was intended. Fixed it now, thanks for pointing it out.
muchichka_s (2023-08-05 05:55:39+00:00): Для чого ти робиш "Мікс Март"->"Мікс Березень"
muchichka_s (2023-08-05 05:57:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11071187352
muchichka_s (2023-08-05 05:58:43+00:00): І знову "Здорова батьківщина"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8828316304
muchichka_s (2023-08-05 06:07:31+00:00): (гора) "Клева" -> "Кльова". Серйозно?
muchichka_s (2023-08-05 06:07:52+00:00): Кросівки Бровари -> Кросівки Бровары
muchichka_s (2023-08-05 06:08:46+00:00): ГастрономЧик->ГастрономЧік