piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
grzegorz75jan (2025-02-06 11:24:17+00:00): Witam. Staraj się nie sklejać obszarów zagospodarowania z drogami https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12560884218#map=19/50.026710/21.073698
Wiem. Wszędzie pełno takich sklejek. W edytorze iD pomocny w tym może być klawisz ctrl lub alt (nie pamiętam ale klawiszologia jest w pomocy edytora). Obrys lasu powinien przebiegać nie po koronach drzew a tak jakby po pniach. No i ten obrys taś średnio pasuje do tego co widać na podkładzie orto. Ktoś będzie chciał dodać residential na podkładzie działek i będzie klął jak szewc.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162198314
StC (2025-03-12 17:07:45+00:00): Bonjour,

la communauté OSM comprend et soutient l'autorité que les propriétaires ou gestionnaires exercent sur les chemins présents sur leur territoire. En revanche, la pratique reconnue dans OSM est de conserver tous les chemins qui existent encore sur le terrain (même illégaux) et de les marquer comme interdits, comme vous l'aviez fait par exemple sur le chemin 1305601430 quelques jours plus tôt. Cela permet par exemple aux secours de savoir par où ils peuvent intervenir si nécessaire.
Est-ce que vous confirmez que tous les chemins supprimés ne sont plus visibles et praticables sur le terrain ?
Garde nature N2000 Monts dore (2025-04-02 14:54:42+00:00): Je comprends votre démarche et oui je confirme. Les chemins ne sont plus visibles, certains correspondent au tracé hivernal des pistes de ski de fond.
StC (2025-04-02 14:59:12+00:00): Merci pour cette confirmation.
Tomas09 (2025-02-06 21:09:11+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

In kort: De oprit (en misschien ook de pier en het zwembad) horen op de kaart te staan met de tag access=private (wat het al had) een revert zou handig zijn aangezien ik niet weet hoe dat moet of het kan terug toegevoegd worden
jaap de vries (2025-02-07 10:48:57+00:00): Ik denk dat de opmerking van de eigenaar nu een groter belang heeft dan dat jij het graag wil.

Waarom hebben jullie onze tuin, paden en vooral ons zwembad op een openbare kaart gezet?
Wij willen dit niet en eis dat dit onmiddellijk er van af wordt gehaald voor dat we vervolgstappen gaan ondernemen.

Maar goed als jij graag een rechtszaak wil van deze eigenaar omdat jij graag het zwembad op deze kaart wil hebben, ook met prive er op dan doe je dat maar. Een wiki pagina is niet rechtsgeldig.
Tomas09 (2025-02-07 13:16:47+00:00): Het is zichtbaar op luchfotos. Die zijn ook openbaar.
jaap de vries (2025-02-07 14:19:52+00:00): Luchtfoto's zijn niet juridisch onderlegt maar zijn hulpmiddelen. Buiten bekijken en vast leggen met gps is legitiem. In dit geval zou ik het laten rusten, de eigenaar is al over de zeik omdat zijn privé zwembad op een openbare kaart zichtbaar was. Op pdok is het niet eens zichtbaar. Wel de waterpartij. Fijne dag verder.
Langlaeufer (2025-02-20 17:15:25+00:00): Sollte das vielleicht motor_vehicle=destination heißen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229923781
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162198690
Langlaeufer (2025-02-26 16:16:11+00:00): Was soll motor_vehicle=designated auf dem Friedhofsweg bedeuten?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162198690
Metasequoia (2025-02-26 16:24:56+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis/die Nachfrage. Es soll destination sein, nicht designated. Weil dort KFZ nur fahren dürfen, wenn sie dort ein legitimes Ziel haben.
Langlaeufer (2025-02-26 16:28:06+00:00): alles klar, dann ist das ja geklärt ;)
borishag (2025-02-06 14:28:44+00:00): Hallo,
Deze openingstijden horen niet bij dit filiaal. Waarschijnlijk heb de openingstijden van het filiaal aan het wateringse veld overgenomen. Kan je de oude (correcte) openingstijden weer terugzetten? zie: https://www.kruidvat.nl/store/drogisterij-kruidvat-7168
MrEggie (2025-02-06 14:54:03+00:00): Excuus, inderdaad, gecorrigeerd
Uralla (2025-02-11 08:08:12+00:00): Почему нет проезда?
Паша1987 (2025-02-11 09:09:59+00:00): Водители сообщают, что там вся дорога изъезжена самосвалами. Глубокая колея, на легковом транспорте там не проехать
Uralla (2025-02-11 09:17:43+00:00): Так это указывает на плохое состояние дороги, а не на запрет проезда как у вас указано в тегах. В прошлом году в середине сентября дорога была сухая и вполне пользовалась спросом на грузовиках, нивах, уазах. Зимой либо по низу либо через гору часто проложен зимник. В общем движение есть и ставить запрет на движение некорректно.
𒂼𒄄　 (2025-02-06 10:11:00+00:00): 
هل انت متاكد من تعديلك هذا؟
لان هور الحمار يقع اسفل هذا الهور، وحسب علمي هذا اسمه هور الجبايش،  
https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%A3%D9%87%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B1_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%8A%D8%B4
kuhni74 (2025-02-06 09:58:31+00:00): Warst Du da echt dort? In keiner mir bekannten Karte ist der Weg eingezeichnet.
JeroenHoek (2025-02-06 09:57:49+00:00): Dan kun je beter highway=path vervangen door highway=foot, anders mag je er qua data nog steeds met een brommer rijden, of een paard.
JeroenHoek (2025-02-06 09:58:03+00:00): Typfout: highway=footway dus.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 13:59:07+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12561013601/history has shop = diy that was added in this edit
What kind of things are sold here? Maybe shop=doityourself or shop=trade is fitting here?
ziomio (2025-02-06 10:10:28+00:00): https://www.12tvparma.it/puntata/tg-parma-edizione-del-05-02-2025-ore-1245/aperta-la-tangenziale-di-noceto-fecci-paese-piu-vivibile-e-sicuro/
Frank Peng (2026-01-20 04:22:03+00:00): Please don't delete existing roads and redraw them anew. Looking at this changeset's edits on OSMCha, I see that you deleted several service roads and redrew them as parking aisles when you could've just retagged the service roads you deleted in this changeset to highway=service + service=parking_aisle. It's against good practice on OSM to delete existing map elements and redraw them from scratch. Please just modify the geometry or tagging of the existing roads or other map elements.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162200907
Frank Peng (2026-01-20 04:31:45+00:00): Also, I see that you merged sections of roads with valid lane counts and guidance (lanes and turn:lanes tagging) with their adjoining ways (roads). The lanes= tag specifies the total number of lanes on a road. If the number of lanes changes, it is necessary to split the OSM way as soon as a new lane has started (regardles of width) or a lane has finished disappearing (usually a merge with another lane). For the unclassified road ways formerly named "Shoppers Way" that you merged in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1108927079/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1108927075/history), those were two seperate connected ways with different lanes= tagging. The road from North Franklin Street to Market Street Northeast begins as one lane starting at North Franklin Street and when it meets with the road link coming from westbound/northbound North Franklin Street, the road becomes two lanes, and the lanes= tag on those unclassified road ways denote that.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162200907
Frank Peng (2026-01-20 04:57:39+00:00): I see that you deleted sections of a service road running between the parking lot and the Christiansburg Marketplace building (such as what you deleted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1269983133/history, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1269983167/history, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1269983164/history, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137167092/history), and redrew the service road as a single way. Please don't remove map elements you don't need or don't like. It's known that not everything is needed by everyone, but you should not remove map elements that someone else added.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_objects_that_you_don't_need_or_like
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162200907
Frank Peng (2026-01-20 05:05:25+00:00): Please don't delete sections of road with valid lane guidance (lanes= and turn:lanes= tagging) such as what you deleted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139502507/history (This section of road was tagged with turn:lanes=left|left|through denoting that the left two lanes are left turn lanes turning left onto North Franklin Street, and the rightmost lane is a through lane going straight onto Shoppers Way). You could've checked the way's tags and clicked on the info icon (the "i" button) to the right of the lanes= tag or the turn:lanes= tag at the bottom of the left-hand "Edit Feature" panel underneath "Tags" in iD if you didn't know what those tags mean. Before making changes to map features based on aerial imagery or local knowledge, check their editing history, changeset comments, tags, and source tags (if there is one). Previous editors may have valuable insights to offer on why things are currently tagged the way they are.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162200907
Frank Peng (2026-01-20 05:22:03+00:00): If you come across a tag you don't understand, click the info icon (the "i" icon) to the right of the tag, and the meaning of the tag and the link to the tag's OSM Wiki article will show up underneath the tag.

In the future, please modify existing map elements instead of deleting them and redrawing them anew, and don't remove map elements you don't need or don't like.

See the OSMCha link of this changeset at the bottom of this comment to see which map elements  you added, modified, or deleted. (You may have to login to OSMCha with your OSM account to visit the link.)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162200907
Frank Peng (2026-01-20 05:24:26+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn#Indicated_turns_by_lane
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162200907
Frank Peng (2026-05-13 22:16:49+00:00): Hi Mitch, I went ahead and swapped the ID of the redrawn roads/service roads/parking aisles you mapped, with the original roads you deleted in this changeset (where you remapped roads in place of the original roads you deleted), using OSM HistoryRestorer.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182622335

OSM History Restorer is an online tool that allows you to restore OSM features that have been deleted and redrawn. It swaps the ID of the redrawn feature with the original, but keeps the geometry of the new feature.
https://osm-nz.github.io/#/restore-history

In the future, per what I mentioned to you in the above comments, *please make sure to modify the geometry of existing map objects or reuse them, instead of deleting them and remapping them anew*. This helps preserve their editing history on OSM. See this OSM Wiki article for more information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162200907
s777n (2025-02-06 12:55:25+00:00): Здравствуйте. Если в organic maps нут нужно типа объекта или объект большой и нужно отметить его территорий а не точкой то лучше просто добавить заметку и ничего не добавлять.

Сейчас вы добавили родник с именем "Глебовское водохранилище".
NeisBot (2025-02-06 10:34:29+00:00): Hi ziomio, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over the last days and weeks, you've made at least 26 with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
ziomio (2025-02-06 15:47:25+00:00): I changed the expected opening date: 09/2025
urbalazs (2025-02-10 22:57:48+00:00): Kedves Mezőberény Város felhasználó! Köszönjük, hogy hozzájárultak az OpenStreetMap fejlesztéséhez. Van azonban egy szerkesztési irányelv, amely pontosan meghatározza, hogy hogyan kell feltüntetni az olyan közterületeket, amelyek más elnevezéssel rendelkeznek az egyik és a másik oldalon. Kijavítottam a szerkesztésüket, és beállítottam az eltérő neveket az utca mindkét oldalán. Ugyanakkor nem szerencsés, hogy a közterületeket így nevezik el, mert nem minden megjelenítő tudja megfelelően kezelni az ilyen eseteket, és ahogy a módosításcsomag megjegyzésében is írták, nehézséget okoz a mentőknek, tűzoltóknak és a futároknak megtalálni a címet. Kérem, hogy fontolják meg a közterületek elnevezésének felülvizsgálatát, és nevezzék el a közterületeket egyértelműen. Jelenleg 6 közterület osztozik 3 néven.
vasony (2025-02-11 21:24:22+00:00): Annyit fűznék hozzá, hogy amennyiben a címek hozzá vannak adva a házakhoz, a tűzoltók is oda fognak találni a házszámok alapján.
rempshaener (2025-02-06 18:23:22+00:00): Hallo,

danke dir, sieht gut aus.

Viele Grüße
aixbrick (2025-02-08 10:00:45+00:00): Als kleine Anmerkung von mir: Laut Luftbildern existieren die Reste der Burgmauern noch (zumindest teilweise). Diese kann man auch mappen. Beispiel Burg Wilhelmstein: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1256017300 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1256017299. Diese Wege folgen dabei deckungsgleich dem Rand der Burgfläche: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17917826 (ich hoffe, es ist verständlich, was ich meine :-)).
tuan_gsm (2025-07-24 08:27:59+00:00): Please help we check this restriciton correct or not?
a16z (2026-04-16 08:22:33+00:00): only_right_turn
P_kawa (2025-09-27 11:44:17+00:00): Może i pociągi bardzo żadko i wolno tutaj jeżdżą natomiast nadal są to czynne tory więc tam gdzie nie ma formalnego przejścia przez nie powinno być to oznaczone w ten sposób.
Kovoschiz (2025-02-06 10:48:04+00:00): Please don't directly delete them, as they contain addresses, and still represent a store space. This makes tracking and updating more difficult, wasting previous efforts. Change it to a plain "point", or "vacant shop".
Tomas09 (2025-02-06 10:40:01+00:00): Forgot the source (aerial imagery)
TrickyFoxy (2025-02-06 11:47:23+00:00): 👋 By this logic, you will remove all name= from memorials
sykul (2025-02-06 13:16:11+00:00): No, by this logic you add the name= that people use to the refer to the memorial itself, like the "Lincoln Memorial", whose subject is "Abraham Lincoln".

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmemorial
TrickyFoxy (2025-02-06 13:19:36+00:00): Tagging is different in Russia https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:historic%3Dmemorial#Как_отмечать_на_карте
sykul (2025-02-06 13:35:17+00:00): That's weird. So why do subject tags exist if name= can either mean the name of the memorial (as you'd expect) or the subject of the memorial (which we have other tags for)?
sykul (2025-02-06 13:37:10+00:00): Do you have the 'name is the name only' guideline in Russia? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
TrickyFoxy (2025-02-06 13:43:39+00:00): There is one linguistic subtlety associated with the presence of cases in the Russian language. 

'Lincoln Memorial' in Russian, it will be written as 'Мемориал ЛинкольнУ'. Memorial is not written, so only 'ЛинкольнУ' remains.

In the case of this monument, the ending of the name (Nicholas -> Nicholas) was not written by agreement, yes. But you shouldn't have deleted it.

But in the case of https://osm.org/node/4898059105 everything is correct
TrickyFoxy (2025-02-06 13:44:06+00:00): Nicholas -> НиколаЮ *
sykul (2025-02-06 14:10:37+00:00): OK. I don't know enough about the Russian language to comment, but if monuments/memorials are named that way in Russian, of course it makes sense to have that as the name tag.
However, I have enough knowledge of English and Chinese to know that you don't just give memorials the exact same name as the thing they depict. If they actually have a name, it's Nelson's Column, the Lincoln Memorial, 人民英雄纪念塔, etc.

I'll leave the tags as they are because at least there are subject tags now, but I should probably go and open up a community thread on the topic because I'm appalled by the idea of using name= for anything other than the name of the thing.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-17 06:39:11+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354417929/history has building:part = 4 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
Caster89 (2026-03-17 08:30:51+00:00): Sorry thanks slipped, it meant to be building:part=yes and building:level=4. I removed the part however as the church was to complicated for me to define better using parts so eft it as it was
jeslop (2025-02-12 15:26:29+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162434756
bxl-forever (2025-02-06 11:48:15+00:00): Hello.
Nice that you want to add buildings but… can you please avoid tracing buildings on aerial imagery.
We do not do this in Belgium.  Every time someone does this, it takes ages to repair and slows down the effort to add missing buildings even more.
In this area of Belgium (Flanders), the reference for building outlines is "Digitaal Vlaanderen GRB", which shows the real outline without the distorsion.
Thanks.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Building_and_address_import
Kookykooky (2025-02-06 12:46:37+00:00): Hi,
thanks for the warning, I'm very sorry for the mess I caused, I will repair the buildings according to the correct base, thanks.
Kookykooky
Leo Slager (2025-02-06 23:27:56+00:00): dag Ferina,

Hier wordt ik niet blij van.
De editor iD kan niet omgaam met het wijzigen van routerelaties. Dat leidt altijd tot fouten en gebroken routes.
Ik ben weer meer dan een uur bezzig om die 10 routerelaties te repareren.

iD plakt namelijk elke nieuw way die je toevoegt vast achter in de relatie zodat er altijd een gebroken routerelatie achter blijft.

TIP wegen die deel uitmaken van een routerelatie dus niet opknippen of samenvoegen.

Als je serieus met routerelaties wilt gaan werken, stap dan over op de editor JOSM. Dan kun je routerelaties op een correcte wijze veranderen.
Leo Slager (2025-02-06 23:28:50+00:00): Hier kun je de fouten zien:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=4.51516&lat=51.83138&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.83&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
jmaspons (2025-02-08 19:51:04+00:00): Can you link the wiki page? Now, the ocean names don't appear in osm.org
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162203483
recrayon (2025-02-08 21:56:33+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aplace%3Docean

it says to keep name=* empty in the "how to map" section.
rskedgell (2025-02-06 11:15:22+00:00): ^ Changeset comment should read "updated sidewalk and highway tagging in Gillingham"
SomeoneElse (2025-04-14 11:19:29+00:00): Hello recrayon,
You might like to join the discussion about naming oceans etc. at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/looking-for-the-pacific-ocean/128699 .
You've said "as per wiki page", but which page, and where was the public discussion around that?
I can see arguments on both sides here, which is why a "big change" like this has hopefully already been widely discussed.
Best Regards,
Andy
Matija Nalis (2025-04-14 23:26:49+00:00): Given the node on which name tag was removed, referenced wiki is likely https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=ocean - but I haven't really seen a discussion on the issue either
s777n (2025-02-06 11:32:26+00:00): Отметил как маршрут. Так же как отмечаются разные трассы. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Relation:route

Автомобильная дорога по ул. Ковалева: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18659929
SomeoneElse (2025-05-25 21:49:03+00:00): Hello,
Are the names of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/560045874 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12561176892 really "Brock Crags (Wainwright)" and "Brock Crags (summit)"?  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brock_Crags just has "Brock_Crags" (with one named, and one unnamed).
Best Regards,
Andy
dpolovinkin (2025-05-07 12:19:02+00:00): this whole zone is not a building, correcting, be careful
ilias_ (2025-02-06 11:45:53+00:00): Thank you!
comfyquiettree (2025-02-06 11:28:24+00:00): Sorry for the large edit - it was purely by accident. I was fixing the old tagging of smoothness and somehow a few of the ways in overpass was for outside the CZ, even though I set the area.
canfe (2025-02-07 11:15:27+00:00): Nella description non va messa nessuna forma di pubblicità come specificato dalla wiki.

"The description should only include neutral and factual information about the object. It should not include subjective evaluations, e.g. "the best restaurant in town", "modern, comfortable hotel, in the heart of the city". Do not use description=* for advertising messages. They will be removed as spam and may also have further consequences for your OSM account."

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
GAL Valli del Canavese (2025-02-07 11:28:42+00:00): Buongiorno
Mi scusi, ma quale pubblicità? Ho descritto l'ambiente circostante
ivanbranco (2025-02-07 12:23:27+00:00): Ciò che intende Canfe è che per convenzione su OSM evitiamo termini soggettivi come "ottimale" e "bellissimi".
canfe (2025-02-07 16:20:55+00:00): E che son praticamente tutti con "pubblicità".
Ne cito un altro fatto da lei.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/809610522

La description è: "Agricoltura manuale e biologica tra le montagne della Valchiusella. Tutti gli ospiti siedono e mangiano insieme ad un tavolo comune in un ambiente domestico. Il prezzo del menu è di 38€ a persona.
GAL Valli del Canavese (2025-02-08 15:01:24+00:00): Li cambierò man mano allora, non è stato volontario, grazie per le dritte!
canfe (2025-02-09 07:52:25+00:00): In che senso "non è stato volontario"?
Se si scrive una cosa, è volontario no?
GAL Valli del Canavese (2025-02-09 10:50:01+00:00): Sono una volontaria di servizio civile e mi sto occupando di mappatura del territorio cercando di inserire tutte le informazioni che riesco a trovare, perciò se come ‘descrizione’ alcune strutture citavano ambiente circostante con aggettivi e i prezzi vari io copiavo e incollavo, non sapendo che non si potesse. Ecco ‘in che senso non è stato volontario’.
In queste settimane sistemerò tutte le cose che non vanno bene :)
canfe (2025-02-09 17:21:17+00:00): Capito.
Ma, ancora una domanda: in che senso "citavano"??
GAL Valli del Canavese (2025-02-10 08:01:51+00:00): Nelle loro pagine social in bio o nei vari siti di prenotazione i proprietari scrivono una descrizione della propria struttura
habi (2025-02-06 11:28:08+00:00): Ich bin 'hier' gelandet, weil in der AquArenA einige Dinge mit denselbem `contact:phone` versehen sind.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-06 23:06:40+00:00): This changeset left the turn lane disconnected at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/65545308
Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162226036
Please make sure to resolve ID warnings before uploading.
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2025-02-07 13:45:05+00:00): Hi Spaghetti Monster! 

My name is Yuliya, and I am the Quality Control Lead on the OSM team at Lyft. 
Thank you for addressing this issue and connecting the roads. We apologize that we have overlooked the warnings, which resulted in two nodes remaining unconnected.

Best regards, Yuliya
muralito (2025-02-06 20:13:50+00:00): Hola. Si tiene lanes=3 no deberia tener 4 valores en turn:lanes. Le corte el tramo y le puse lanes=4.
Nachof (2025-02-06 23:34:33+00:00): Ah, perfecto, mil gracias por la corrección y el tip para la próxima.
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-06 11:42:15+00:00): It seems like something went wrong here. 

Could you clarify why the toilets were added to the relation for Sri Lanka?