piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2025-08-06 16:36:46+00:00): Hallo! Bitte schau Dir mal den Weg https://www.osm.org/way/23787720 an. Gibt es einen Grund warum Du den highway Wert von service auf "way 23787720" geändert hast?
custodiankeyy (2025-08-05 19:17:45+00:00): 3522226 ve 3602005 ID'ye sahip notları neden çözüldü olarak işaretlediniz? Orada artık bina bulunmamakta mı?
Chico_Boy (2025-08-05 20:14:15+00:00): Buradaki notların bina eklenme isteği olduğunu anlamamıştım. Yeni bir düzenleme yapıp bina ve site bilgilerini ekledim. Yorumun için teşekkürler notlarda yazan bazı şeyleri anlamamıştım.
gurglypipe (2025-08-04 22:25:33+00:00): The signage differs (‘except for access’ / ‘except for loading’) at the two ends and I’ve arbitrarily picked the latter for the tagging (meaning maxweightrating:hgv:conditional=none @ delivery) as that’s more common throughout Lancaster.
balint36 (2025-09-06 20:27:28+00:00): A 152-es vonal használati állapotáról júniusban volt már szó: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168000233
de akkor nem igazán törted magad azzal, hogy válaszol.
Azóta nem történt változás a vonallal kapcsolatban, és ezzel a szerkesztéseddel sem adtál meg semmi újat, ami alátámasztaná a használati állapot megváltoztatását.
Tekintve, hogy ez már egy hónapja volt, ezért ha ezúttal sem reagálsz, a használatot a holnapi napon visszaállítom, a visszaállításomat forrással fogom alátámasztani. Amennyiben azt követően ismét visszaállítod az állapotot semmitmondó összefoglalóval (utak, épületek korrigálása), akkor vandalizmus miatt jelenteni fogom a tevékenységedet.
balint36 (2025-09-06 20:30:03+00:00): A holnapi forrásomat már most megadom:
HÜSZ 2.3.1. sz. melléklet, Vasútvonalak, pályaszakaszok legfontosabb jellemzői
A forrás a 152. Fülöpszállás - Kecskemét alsó vasútvonal Fülöpszállás (kiz.) - Helvécia (kiz.) vonalszakaszra azt írja, hogy "A vonal forgalomból kizárva."
balint36 (2025-09-06 20:30:58+00:00): Továbbra a címkézésben is zavart okoztál:
disused:railway=rail és railway=rail együtt nem használandó.
balint36 (2025-09-08 09:45:48+00:00): Nem kaptam reakciót sem erre, sem az üzenetre, amit írtam, így - egy nap késéssel - a korábbi címkézést visszaállítottam.
Felhívom figyelmedet (mondjuk úgyse figyelsz ide), hogy a címkézést forrással végeztem el, amit meg is jelöltem a szerkesztési összefoglalóban. Ha ennek ellenére minden további magyarázat nélkül visszaállítod a helytelen címkéket, úgy én azt vandalizmusnak fogom venni.
heretofore (2025-09-21 17:59:32+00:00): This broke continuity of the Rachel Carson Greenway trail.
Malcolm Maas (2025-09-22 12:51:57+00:00): fixed
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-03 19:42:59+00:00): Hello!

You used
railway=railno
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/801778996/history

Have you maybe meant
railway=rail
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
RailandSea (2026-02-09 21:18:47+00:00): it was a typo I fixed it thanks for looking out
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:43:17+00:00): and thanks for a fix!
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-04 23:00:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1194530215

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-08-06 21:20:25+00:00): naprawione
bartgron (2025-08-05 19:40:56+00:00): Opis zawiera elementy spamu/reklamy, proszę o korektę
LordGarySugar (2025-08-13 19:25:53+00:00): Nobody actually uses this name in everyday speech, in my opinion Brisbane Road is the common name and should be used for name=, with BetWright stadium only tagged as official_name
rskedgell (2025-08-14 00:16:38+00:00): I'd be happier if my team's stadium kept its original name, too. Unfortunately, what is displayed in fixture lists is the official name. If you're confident that Nominatim recognises official_name=*, feel free to revert this.
LordGarySugar (2025-08-14 01:14:32+00:00): I'm fairly sure nominatim does support official_name, see searching for lastminute.com London Eye...
In my opinion OSM should mirror Wikipedia in keeping the common names of stadiums instead of renaming articles or OSM objects when they get a new sponsorship names

Leyton Orient is your club? Have you checked out my 3D mapping of the stadium in F4map? https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.5600475&lon=-0.0123069&zoom=18&camera.theta=57.655&camera.phi=-118.619
rskedgell (2025-08-14 07:57:22+00:00): Every other London stadium appears to have kept its real name, so I've reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170421897

Your 3D mapping is very impressive. I played about with it for a bit, but lost interest after Streets GL went from using live data to a never updated planet download.
Polarbear (2025-10-11 21:15:04+00:00): Hi LordMadsen,
danke für's eintragen. 
Eine Fußpflege ist doch aber kein Arzt?
user_5359 (2025-08-05 17:43:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1420070232. What is the mean of the tag mov = Salida ?
pwbriggs (2025-08-06 04:36:03+00:00): Nice work, thanks for the contribution! In the future, you can select an area and press "q" (or right click > square) to make the corners of an area into right angles.

Thanks again, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-05 02:38:31+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13049210572/history has shop = duty_free that was added in this edit
shop=duty_free? What is actually sold here? Tobacco? Alcohol? Jewellery? Chocolate? migrating to shop=yes duty_free=yes sounds well, but there is also duty_free=refund... So it needs in-place survey to check to fix
MassCartog (2025-08-05 00:24:20+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. The features you removed in this changeset seem valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, On OSM, we do not removed features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public, or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing them is actually considered vandalism.

I've been looking through your edits, and it seems like it's just mass deleting "closed" trails. Again, if a trail is closed this is not a valid reason to remove it. 

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

You have said it in your changeset descriptions, some of these trails have been closed or decommissioned for years, yet there is a ton of heat map activity along them in the last 12 months. This points to them still existing on the ground in some form. Again, unless they do not exist at all, we don't remove them from OSM.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
Kovoschiz (2025-08-05 17:19:29+00:00): Please don't add bracketed labels to `name=` which is for proper names only. `ref=` already exists.
timonoj (2025-08-06 04:50:35+00:00): Thanks for the help. I'm a newbie editing labels. I guess I'm a bit confused about the discrepancies on how the map is being displayed in OSM, vs how it shows in apps such as OSMAnd and CoMaps/Organic Maps. Neither of these show the exit codes properly. I thought the issue layed upon the map itself, but not sure exactly what's the issue. Sheung Wan subway stations show a bit borked (A1 is missing the exit code in CoMaps/Organic, and A2 is showing as 'Wing Lok Street [A2][A2]' in OSMAnd). I can see in the Tsim Sha Tsui subway station, both B1 and B2 are missing their exit code in Comaps, and somehow OSMAnd only shows B2 label at a higher zoom level than B1 (?). 
Is there a way the default view on most apps would show something a bit more unified? What would be your suggestion for this?

Thanks!
Kovoschiz (2025-08-06 17:04:55+00:00): You should ask those applications. We don't control how each of them work. 
It's likely they show `ref=` when zoomed out, and `name=` zoomed in. You would need to suggest to show both.
aharvey (2025-08-05 13:14:46+00:00): your changes resulted in a number of overlaping ways, so I've cleaned this up, however I'm not sure about the tags for each of the resulting segments.
Comino (2025-08-05 07:30:03+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#legacy-tags
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin
EricTheLinguist (2025-11-09 00:33:57+00:00): This is some really beautiful work on the landscaping, keep it up!
b-jazz (2025-08-08 05:00:52+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1420091425, et al

When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. If you could go back and clean up where you've made this mistake, that would be helpful. But more importantly, if you could stop from doing this in the future, it would be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out.
b-jazz (2025-08-08 05:02:29+00:00): Also, you shouldn't be giving a name to a bunker like "Sand Trap". That is redundant with the tag of "golf=bunker". And the nearby green shouldn't be named "#4 Green". If you want to include the hole number on the green, you can do it with a "ref=4" tag, but naming a green shouldn't be done here.
Whippy107 (2025-08-08 12:14:41+00:00): Hi b-jazz, I agree with your comments concerning naming features, and these will be cleaned up, but you must remember that this is a work in progress and these references help.  To address your other concern about fairways surrounding the greens, I looked over 4 different very famous courses in OSM before I started my project and they all show features drawn this way.  Perhaps I am misunderstanding you
b-jazz (2025-08-08 17:09:24+00:00): Hey Whippy, thanks for responding. I get that things might be in flux while you in the middle of a project. It would be beneficial if you could find another way to indicate progress other than introducing errors into the map though. Maybe a "note" tag or "todo" tag.

Sorry if you other comment was confusing. I come across a lot of these and have made the comment as generic as possible while still trying to get the point across. The comment in this case was specifically because the fairway border cut right through the bunker, and that's not right. I see that you've corrected it now. Thanks for doing that!
Whippy107 (2025-08-08 18:07:02+00:00): b-jazz, thank you very much for helping me out with your constructive tips!  Since this golf course is now abandoned, will I just need to remove it when/if someone asks me to do so in order to make room for its current real world development?
b-jazz (2025-08-09 00:50:16+00:00): I don't have a good answer for that. It depends on how much you want to be involved. I'm not that familiar with tagging areas that are abandoned and under construction, but do know that some tags exist to indicate that. You should check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org and see what you can find there. If you don't take care of it yourself, I'm sure someone will redraw it eventually. That's the joy of mapping in an ever-changing world.
dankarran (2025-08-05 12:59:31+00:00): These mostly seem unlikely. Please can you provide some sources?
Ansderer (2025-08-06 05:27:06+00:00): The places are available on ground mostly marked in the locality status where in the Isle of Man us (the government) use locality as a way to describe areas with at least 2 houses in a small area.
Ansderer (2025-08-06 05:28:34+00:00): If it is possible, can you describe the localities in which you suggest it may be false? It might be and we have mapped it wrong.
dankarran (2025-08-06 16:31:20+00:00): I'd say all of them look like vandalism except perhaps Ballavarkish and Ballaquayle, where you've added new localities right beside existing farms with the same name.

If the rest were real places, they should show on the official government maps, no? https://www.gov.im/maps

Unless you can provide some proof that any of these exist where you've placed them, please revert these changes and any other similar changes you've made.
buy_osmand (2025-08-05 09:02:57+00:00): 👨‍🦽👍
NeisReview (2025-08-05 05:30:37+00:00): #NameTag

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I’ve taken a look at your recent edits, especially those involving name tags. Some of the names you’ve added caught my attention, as they seem a bit unusual. As noted in the OSM Wiki, the name tag should contain only the actual name of the feature—not descriptions, types, locations, family names, addresses, or other attributes.

Could you please confirm whether these entries were intentional or possibly added by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

---
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:name
dankarran (2025-08-05 12:54:51+00:00): This doesn't seem right? Surely there can only be one Ramsey ;)
Ansderer (2025-08-06 10:44:03+00:00): I may be inaccurate, but there is a Ramsey locality in that area I assume.
dankarran (2025-08-07 10:21:03+00:00): Ramsey is the town to the north?
dankarran (2025-08-05 13:00:34+00:00): Outer?
Ansderer (2025-08-06 10:46:04+00:00): The name is an English word ‘outer’ due to the small locality being outside the Colden Plantation.
Kovoschiz (2025-08-05 17:15:36+00:00): Please don't add `railway=station` + `public_transport=station` to each structure, which should only be `building=train_station` . This is duplicating.
rab (2025-08-12 19:25:43+00:00): Hi Ēka_nambara,
this looks fictional to me,
like most of your recent edits. 
How are you able to survey all this different places?
rab (2025-08-14 19:09:26+00:00): mostly correct,
verified by a local mapper
Patchi (2025-08-21 13:30:21+00:00): Hello ratrun,

Small question about the change of the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25968915. Usually there is no separate cycleway lane on living streets in France as pedestrian and cycle has priority. Have you seen a lane on this living_street? And if yes why not on the next segment https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1387467098?

Best regards,

Patchi.
ratrun (2025-08-21 15:10:51+00:00): Hello Patchi,

The reason is that user yoann_immergis created a duplicated way with these tags before. See

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1419959614/history/1

In my change I deleted this superfluous parallel duplicated way and merged the new tags which this user had added in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169952769#map=16/44.65934/6.63488&layers=VN. 

So I'm sorry, I'm not able to answer your question. If you really like to know we need to ask user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/yoann_immergis

I asked him in his changeset to comment here.
Patchi (2025-08-21 16:00:54+00:00): Hello ratrun,

OK thank you for your quick feedback. We will then wait for the other feedback.

Best regards,

Patchi.
yoann_immergis (2025-09-08 10:38:18+00:00): Hi Patchi and raturn,

Sorry for the late reply, I was on vacation and didn't see the messages

I apologize for the duplicate way, my mistake. The duplicate had wrong tags so I will delete them

Sorry for the inconvenience
SteffoStefonion (2025-08-05 04:50:45+00:00): I am so sorry, i put the wrong source, here is the correct one: https://www.ywg.ca/en/passengers/at-ywg/services/view-service/15/pet-relief-area/
mavl (2025-08-07 03:00:00+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, у вас есть разрешение от Яндекса на использование его карт в целях уточнения других карт (например, OpenStreetMap)?
Roydon Olive (2025-08-05 11:52:25+00:00): You can also add play grounds as areas if you wish.
Pontificator Extraordinaire (2025-08-05 16:21:03+00:00): Please make sure to double check your edits before submitting them, especially when importing or using automated tools that are prone to making errors. Most of the buildings added in your edit are okay, however several were traced incorrectly and should be manually redrawn before uploading.

Examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1420107846
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1420107832

When in doubt, do not simplify: follow the outline as closely as possible.
Daniel_Malloy (2025-08-05 17:03:10+00:00): I appreciate the reminder to double check edits with regards to automated tools.

Additional reminder. OpenStreeMap takes a Wiki-style approach to map edits. In simplest terms, a good edit is one that improves accuracy. In the case of these edits, no data existed. Therefore, they're still good edits as it improves the map's overall accuracy.

If you find something that can be more accurate, make the change and contribute instead of just calling it out... We both each could have made the changes in the time it took either of us to type our messages... I'm going to get back to editing and improving our map experience and hope you do the same.
Pontificator Extraordinaire (2025-08-05 17:30:29+00:00): Sorry if I came across as rude. I noticed you were making a lot of automated edits in this area, saw errors that may have been unintentional, and wanted to let you know in case you weren't aware. You appear to be a new mapper, that's all.
Daniel_Malloy (2025-08-05 18:29:17+00:00): Appreciate you looking out for new beginners. We got caught in a case of profiles not reflecting experience for sure... I've been in and around the GIS/mapping/surveying spaces for over a decade... and yours showing you've joined only months previously... I think we have both come from misaligned views.

For fun and to expand, here's a sample of the quality I typically aspire to in my typical work... basemap created back before we had reliable ortho imagery  using Trimble GPS (second unit set up stationary to provide a reference), collecting over 400k individual GPS points translating to just over 6,000 reference points... all major utility lines surveyed, all lighting, security cameras (the publicly seen ones), and grounds information captured. Building CADs were also overlaid to provide internal building visibility. 

https://postimg.cc/gwx5Khnw
GerdP (2025-08-06 08:46:03+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
This node was part of a boundary relation and marks the position where renderers could place the country name.
GerdP (2025-08-06 08:48:43+00:00): I've reverted this changeset here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170044698
David Lemayian (2025-08-25 05:58:58+00:00): Aah.. Ok. Let me place it then somewhere appropriate then
GerdP (2025-08-25 06:07:12+00:00): It's been there for ~ 16 years now. What's wrong with the position?
David Lemayian (2025-08-25 06:11:39+00:00): @GerdP I think as a Kenyan, it's a very strange place to be considered a central location for the pin. Saw an image recently that was generated with it and it looked off.
GerdP (2025-08-25 06:22:02+00:00): OK, I'm from Germany and I have no idea why that location was used, but it's probably something that should be discussed with others . Maybe the african community? See
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/africa/39
David Lemayian (2025-08-25 07:00:15+00:00): Aah.. Yes, I'm acquainted with the OSM Africa community. Do you know if edit requests like these also get flagged for QA folk from Africa? Like how a change request would be routed to a pool of folk who are from the continent or prioritised for folk from Kenya for example
GerdP (2025-08-25 07:07:28+00:00): Oh, be careful. OSM doesn't have something like an edit request. If you change data it is directly changed in the data base. The concept in OSM is that someone will notice if someone else did something wrong.
The change in this specific changeset was discussed in the german forum:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/knoten-kenia-geloscht/133746
David Lemayian (2025-08-25 12:42:30+00:00): @GerdP yes, I guess "request" is not the appropriate term here.

But that thread is very useful. Thank you for pointing to it. I did have the same sentiment on the label being unnecessary but I understand that it is a practice OSM wants to keep for now.

I'll discuss the location of the marker in a different forum. It's useful to get it right as part of building the appeal of OSM with other stakeholders.
GerdP (2025-08-25 13:46:23+00:00): OK, very good. Have fun!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-05 08:58:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/912908633/history - I will remove also footway:surface as not needed (and would confuse StreetComplete)
aceman444 (2025-08-05 11:21:20+00:00): Zdravim, poprosim lepsi popis sad zmien, pozrite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn .

A na tie atrakcie by nemalo davat na vsetky len tourism=attraction, skor namiesto toho len prislusne attraction=*. Ak neviete vhodnu hodnotu, dajte tam fixme poznamku. 
Tiez pridavat len "addr:city" a "addr:postcode" na vsetky objekty, bez kompletnej adresy je dost zbytocne.
Pavol33 (2025-08-05 11:42:37+00:00): Zdravim, 
ja len pri doplnani opakujem, co niekto predo mnou tam dal. Vo vsetkych zabavnych parkoch po Europe je to takto. Ak to je nespravne, preco to nikto doteraz neopravil, to nechapem.
Mate pravdu, ten popis zmien by mal byt opisany, ale ja robim stovky zmien a to nie je v mojich silach vsetko popisat

skusal som zadat attraction=* do vyhladavacieho pola, ale nic mi nenaslo. Dole do pola miesto tourist mam co z toho menu vybrat.
aceman444 (2025-08-06 17:42:22+00:00): Noo, mate len par stoviek zmien, tak tie popisy by ste mohli zvladnut. Ja mam tisice a kazdy popis je jedinecny (minimalne aby som uz z textu vedel, na akom mieste som menil).

Praveze tu v Energylandii je to uz celkom dobre, mnohe su spravne. Ale co ste pridali aj to je lepsie ako nic, mohol som pokracovat dalej a typ atrakcie som zistil zo stranky Energylandie, takze uz som to poopravoval.

Neviem kde ste to vyhladavali (zrejme nieco v editore iD), ale kluc attraction ma na vyber vela moznosti:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:attraction

Napr. tie lodicky (bumper_boat), ci horska draha (roller_coaster) tam su, takze som to upresnil.

Ak je to po Europe zle, mozno je to len starsi stav, tieto atrakcie sa dost vyvijaju a kym neoboli na osm.org vykreslovane so spravnymi tagmi, tak to ludia hocijako obchadzali (napr. railway=narrow_gauge), len aby sa tie kolaje horskych drah nejako vykreslili.

Je dobre, ze uz to aj osm.org vykresluje, takze nemusia maperi takto klamat a ohybat znacky.

Dakujem
Pavol33 (2025-08-07 06:53:28+00:00): Dakujem
NieWnen (2025-08-05 19:28:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35005748

To jest dirt? Czy tylko mały fragment północny? Bo BDOT pokazuje kostkę brukową od Kopernika.
NieWnen (2025-08-05 19:29:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35005747

A tu połowa jest w BDOTcie jako żwir.
NieWnen (2025-08-05 19:30:38+00:00): *Bez tego drugiego komentarza, źle spojrzałem. Tu jak najbardziej pokazuje ścieżkę gruntową.
NieWnen (2025-08-05 19:41:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/801553288

Czy to na pewno jest surface=pebblestone?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dpebblestone

Może gravel/fine_gravel, albo zwykła ziemia?