piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Minh Nguyen (2025-12-09 16:43:50+00:00): There’s a marking at the beginning of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454396610 that says “TUGS ONLY”. I believe it refers to the kind of vehicle that pulls an airplane around, also known as a pushback tractor. [1] This is in contrast to the surrounding ways, which allow other tractors and ground support equipment.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pushback_(aviation)
user_5359 (2025-11-29 08:52:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Sorry, but business entries without addresses are not in line with OSM. Please add the street and house number, or we will have to mark this as SPAM.
I have reverted your entry.
NeisBot (2025-12-13 21:51:03+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

Your changeset was commented because it appears to follow a pattern that could be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related.

Could you kindly confirm if your map edits were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #Name #Comment
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-13 21:57:57+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175266878
Supaplex (2025-11-28 15:41:12+00:00): 已經有了，重覆添加了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156426257
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 06:35:58+00:00): Hello!

You used
bicycle=yes-
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8420396306/history

Have you maybe meant
bicycle=yes
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
georginakirrin (2026-02-06 07:13:11+00:00): Thanks for your message. It was indeed an unintended typo. Another user fixed it yesterday. Happy to see correction cycles are working. ;-)
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-06 08:16:23+00:00): and thanks for mapping gate in the first place!

such typos are easy to notice remotely, gates in forests are harder!
NeisBot (2025-12-13 21:51:05+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "VLSI training institute in Bengaluru and Hyderabad"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 17:06:13+00:00): 🔴 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by https://osm.org/changeset/176015512
Supaplex (2025-11-30 14:37:09+00:00): 重覆添加了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172618645
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175234885
Supaplex (2025-11-28 15:39:34+00:00): 已經有了，重覆添加了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80219144
elsy1 (2025-11-28 14:12:49+00:00): vandal edit.
reverted 
#175240596
rempshaener (2025-11-28 18:31:16+00:00): Hallo,
ja richtig, die Nennweite gehört in fire_hydrant:diameter
Viele Grüße
5m4u9 (2025-11-29 05:40:25+00:00): Hmm... this highway isn't separated by any barrier between the roundabout on the left and the intersection of "circunvalación" and "del ejercito" avenues...
LakeTorrens (2025-12-03 08:16:19+00:00): Hi 5m4u9,

I agree that the current modeling appears to be incorrect or outdated, and I don’t see any clear physical barrier. Unfortunately, the imagery is a bit too unclear for me to confidently verify the full extent of the barrier or determine which roads fully connect at the various intersections.

If you’re familiar with the area and feel comfortable making the changes, you’re more than welcome to update the roadway.

Have a great day!
Geim (2025-12-07 10:09:54+00:00): Hey Thomas,
Welke luchtfoto heb jij gebruikt om dit te mappen? Die in ID geeft de oude situatie aan.  Dit is hoe het er in werkelijkheid uitziet: https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.97560,5.895729,19/?datastrip=20251121_PNEO-04
A67-A67 (2025-12-07 11:41:29+00:00): Ik heb deze wijziging teruggedraaid. De nieuwe situatie stond al correct in OSM, inclusief nieuwe verkeerslichten, voorsorteervakken e.d. Deze wijziging zette de oude situatie terug.
Tomas09 (2025-12-07 11:58:05+00:00): Oh Oeps😅 ik had het dan verkeerd in mijn herinnering en had de oude en nieuwe inrichting door elkaar gewisseld. Bedankt voor het resetten (:
Geim (2025-12-07 16:07:35+00:00): Kan gebeuren. 
Kleine tip, voordat je aan zo'n ingrijpende wijziging begint, kijk even wat en wanneer de vorige wijzigingen waren, mocht dat onlangs zijn, dan zou het kunnen zijn dat je met oude data aan het werk bent en dat je je pannen moet heroverwegen.
Vraag me niet hoe ik dat weet :-o
elsy1 (2025-11-28 14:15:45+00:00): reverted vandal edit
#175240746
Supaplex (2025-11-28 15:12:06+00:00): 重覆添加了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9191159989
eggie (2025-11-28 13:18:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   ..  Format phone +31 aangepast. construction verwijderd. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
elsy1 (2025-11-28 14:16:55+00:00): reverted
elsy1 (2025-11-29 07:02:55+00:00): reverted vandal edit
Makeena (2025-12-05 19:01:33+00:00): Hi, I just reverted a maleficient edit concerning busline 38 of a user before you. Since your changeset also edits this line, please check that your edits aren't affected. Thanks!
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-28 15:43:12+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13338287750

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-11-28 13:21:09+00:00): Welkom bij OSM. 
Bedankt voor je bijdrage.
Je hebt het gebouw verwijderd. 
Bedrijven taggen we bij in OSM op de adresnode. Ik zal wat herstellen.
MVG
eggie
stoerte (2025-12-06 18:20:56+00:00): Joo, danke dir für's Mappen der Region! :D
Allerdings ein kleiner Hinweis am Rande: der Operator-Tag von Bahnanlagen der DB InfraGO hat einheitlich "DB InfraGO AG" zu sein und nicht "DB InfraGO". ^^

LG stoerte
kiwilecker (2025-12-06 18:25:46+00:00): Hi stoerte, wurde das letztens nochmal abgestimmt? Ich hatte vor ein paar Monaten mal nach Infos dazu gesucht und hatte nur gelesen, dass es dazu bisher keine Einigkeit gab und es erst mal alle machen wie sie es sinnvoller finden 😶

Ich meine diesen Thread hier: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mechanischer-edit-verschmelzung-db-netz-ag-und-db-station-service-ag-zu-db-infrago-ag/106789/25
stoerte (2025-12-06 19:02:26+00:00): Die Indexierung, die dort in dem Thread angesprochen wurde impliziert ausschließlich, dass der Tag am häufigsten genutzt wird und daher von OSM vorgeschlagen wird.
Historisch zu Zeiten der Netz AG und der Service&Stations AG hat man immer häufiger die Operator-Tags mit "AG" gehabt als ohne. Daher, denke ich, ist es sinnvoll, dass man das auch so fortführt. :D
kiwilecker (2025-12-07 19:08:17+00:00): Um die Indexierung gings mir gar nicht, sondern die Diskussion als ganzes - es sind sich ja alle einig, sich uneinig zu sein.
Ich will auch gar nicht irgendwem auf die Füße treten oder so, ich bin nur gerade dabei die gesamte Strecke von Bitterfeld nach Berlin möglichst genau zu mappen, und da ist einiges noch unter DB Netz getaggt, deswegen wollte ich das bei meinen Edits einheitlich machen. Ich würde nicht einfach nur InfraGO AG zu InfraGO verändern, weil ich das persönlich besser finde, und aber sonst gar nichts ändern.
stoerte (2025-12-08 08:40:33+00:00): Ich persönlich würde es begrüßen, wenn man wenigstens auf die InfraGO aktualisierte Tags einfach so belässt, wie sie sind, egal ob mit dem "AG" oder ohne, wenn man sich schon nicht einigen kann, welcher Tag es letztlich sein soll.
Meine persönliche Präferenz ist wie bereits erläutert immer mit dem "AG", weil es in der Vergangenheit auch die verbreitetere und meiner Meinung nach vollständigere Bezeichnung war und ist. Aber sofern du beim Rest der Strecke auf das "AG" verzichten möchtest, sei dies dir überlassen. :D
Frans S (2025-12-06 13:11:59+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not add names with a message to a building. 
Local mappers will add extra's when required like shop, café, church etc.
Best regards
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-28 13:59:19+00:00): Corrected the street address; abbreviations like "ln" shouldn't be used (computers suck at guessing what these should mean but can easily create abbreviations from the full word if desired).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175237244
Beinardus (2025-11-30 14:54:16+00:00): Thanks for the review. I took it from the ticket because I could not find the name of the road in OSM. I will keep it in mind.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-28 14:52:32+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248961049
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454420788

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-28 15:13:26+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248961049
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454420788

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-28 15:23:09+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248961049
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454420788

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-28 15:43:07+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248961049
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454420788

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NieWnen (2025-11-28 18:51:31+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tych zmian?
MartorCZ (2025-12-01 12:39:19+00:00): report of #mapycom user: Mapa pokazuje w Alei Krakowskiej ograniczenie do 90 km/h w rzeczywistości jest 50km/h.
Then i checked it on Streetview.
goaned (2025-12-25 17:40:11+00:00): Hallo, das ganze Gewerbegebiet https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1143164534 heißt bestimmt nicht "Jumpin Prater", daher habe ich diesen Teil wieder zurückgesetzt.
eggie (2025-11-28 13:26:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-11-28 13:28:22+00:00): Tip  Je kunt ook een vlak maken met die zelfde tags over het terrein ipv de adresnode. 
MVG
eggie
CanopyFalls (2025-11-28 13:29:06+00:00): Noticed this changeset deletes a random tree a ways north of the building, is this intentional?

Other than that looks all good, nice building refinement!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175238429
beza208 (2025-11-28 13:48:58+00:00): Hey! I did not delete it intentionally! Please an you help to revert the mistake? Thank
beza208 (2025-11-28 13:51:37+00:00): Sorry! I meant, Please can you help to revert the mistake? Thank you for the observation.
CanopyFalls (2025-11-28 22:46:21+00:00): Looks like there is still a tree node there so I suspect you just ended up deleting a duplicate node on further inspection. Whatever the case the map is currently correct so no more action needed.

TYSM for your reply and for improving the map!
Frans S (2025-12-21 16:52:46+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.

* Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object.

Keep on mapping!
gscholz (2025-11-29 10:21:03+00:00): HI Hugoren,
this changeset has created a lot of errors regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-1.59194&lat=43.15514&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175238467

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Hugoren Martinako (2025-11-29 12:08:01+00:00): Thanks for the heads-up, I restored the intersections caused. I hope it's solved.
Sébastien Pi (2025-11-28 13:37:48+00:00): Salut Simon,

Ça me paraît tout à fait acceptable de retirer le designated avec dirt comme vous l’indiquez dans https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4982399

Bonne après-midi,
Sébastien, envahi de notifications^^
simon_geovelo (2025-11-28 13:43:20+00:00): Les signalemende notre noteur compulsif nes ont plus envoyé coté osm. Tu devrais avoir moins de notification ;-) 
Je fais par contre une une après midi traitement des signalement donc tu risque d'avoir des notifs toute l'après midi :-D
Sébastien Pi (2025-11-28 13:48:55+00:00): Chouette ! Amuse-toi !

Est-ce que tu peux me laisser celle-ci par contre : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4977190

Il a levé un point intéressant sur le Wiki pour les voies piétonnes partagées et je souhaiterais en parler sur le forum pour voir le consensus sur ce sujet (et traiter la note/mettre à jour le Wiki si nécessaire).
Frans S (2026-01-28 12:11:41+00:00): Hello.
A remark. 
You are mapping on JOSM. 
Are you familiar with the plugin
Data Validator
and map paint style : inline validations ?
These are very usefull tools and assist you to review your mappings and correct issues before you upload your work.
Best regards
North66 (2025-11-29 09:18:45+00:00): Hi Oestermalm

Ich habe gerade gesehen, dass du beim Restaurant Frohsinn bei den öffnungszeiten am Sonntag "Su Ruhetag" getaggt hast. Da dies kein offzieller tag ist gemäss https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours, habe ich ihn abgeändert zu "Su off". Ich hoffe, das ist in Ordnung.
NeisBot (2025-12-13 21:51:11+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Beauty services on New Cairo Banks st"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 17:06:51+00:00): 🔴 Partly reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/176015536
NeisReview (2025-12-16 17:09:41+00:00): 🔴 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by https://osm.org/changeset/176015656
wombatmaper (2025-11-29 00:02:59+00:00): wouldnt this be diet:vegan=only ?
yetzt (2025-11-29 00:10:29+00:00): indeed. thanks for catching the oversight.
CjMalone (2026-01-03 09:39:16+00:00): Hey, you seem to be adding UPRNs to nodes in roads (eg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12522396301) however if it's a road record it should be assigned to the road (probably https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61430885) if it's not a road record, it should have a category or address tagged
philipcullen (2026-01-03 13:44:41+00:00): Hi, there seem to be a few different approaches to street UPRNs (adding them to the way, to all the nodes in the way, or to a single node). I've tried to add them to a node close to the location of the UPRN (normally the end of the road, but occasionally in the middle). This probably requires some more discussion elsewhere, but my thinking was this was the simplest way of getting them in, then USRNs might get added at some later point to the way itself (or maybe a relation of ways.
CjMalone (2026-01-04 16:10:38+00:00): I'm not familiar with either a single node or all nodes, they both seem awful. Imagine doing it to a building. When you say "more discussion", does that mean there has been some, please could I have a link?

I have a strong preference for only adding UPRNs when we have a strong suspension we know what it's for. When we suspect it's for a road, it should be added to a road, when we suspect it's an address, it should be added to an address. Otherwise what value is adding them to OSM in the first place?
philipcullen (2026-01-04 16:58:28+00:00): I've come across the "all nodes on a road" approach when looking at looking at UPRNs that were in OSM multiple times - I've left them as they were, though I agree that's an odd approach.

I don't have hugely strong feelings between the two other approaches - the wiki seems to suggest both possibilities - "UPRNs being on multiple sections of the road OR at a single point on the road.". That said, in some cases (at junctions) it isn't always clear which road is linked to which UPRN without checking against the linked USRN.
CjMalone (2026-01-04 17:49:37+00:00): I've asked Jez about when/why he added the "OR at a single point on the road" part, I'll see what he says. There was a Talk GB thread at the time for some context.

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2020-November/025400.html

I would still not add UPRNs when we don't know what they are for.
CjMalone (2026-01-04 18:12:45+00:00): Jez can't remember much about that quote, but believed the UPRNs applied to the junction, not a street
philipcullen (2026-01-09 18:57:36+00:00): This might sound even worse to you - but what are you thoughts on adding the street UPRN to the nearest node on the street, and the street way? That would allow for the alignment benefits of the nodes (they tend to be well aligned at junctions) and add the UPRN to the related way itself.
CjMalone (2026-01-10 11:05:14+00:00): I strongly believe we should be adding the UPRN to what it represents, if it's a street record it should be in the street (highway=*)
CanopyFalls (2025-11-28 23:16:32+00:00): Looks good aside from this building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1256346261
It seems to have gotten smaller and less accurate to the full shape of the building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175239873
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:35:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:35:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
Hufkratzer (2025-11-28 16:04:58+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454437728 and,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454437729 are no riding centers. The large one is a riding arena and should be tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian instead of leisure=horse_riding.
The small one (pound pen or lunging circle) is usually also tagged this way. Example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063434544#map=19/38.221983/-77.758979&layers=P
Photo:
https://clearwindfarm.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/DJI_0022-1030x773.jpg
Compare OSM wiki
LokNeko (2025-12-03 16:13:51+00:00): 前山大桥旁边的钢便桥早在2023年底就拆除了，之前其他编辑者已经把他删掉了，你把他加回来干什么。
LokNeko (2025-12-03 16:16:12+00:00): Bing和Ersi用的图还是2023年初的，太老了，建议遇到这种明显不对但没人管的，参考下其他地图（比如某地图今年8月29号这里有更新）
LokNeko (2025-12-03 16:32:43+00:00): 还有，你改港二路的时候，注意巴士关系网络啊，把路双向化之后，巴士的关系也要修改才行，不然很奇怪的
LokNeko (2025-12-03 16:36:54+00:00): 还有，南油花园旁边的停车场小路是可以连上粤海路和港二路的，还有专门的红绿灯，你别把他断开啊
LokNeko (2025-12-03 16:40:19+00:00): 以后你还是多对一些没人编辑的区域去完善吧，市区部分我会维护的，主要是修起来也很花时间，每周四周五晚上我都会出去到处走走看看的
elsy1 (2025-11-29 07:05:02+00:00): reverted
vsandre (2025-12-01 09:32:16+00:00): Hallo NdwMan,
vielen Dank für deine Ergänzungen. Ich sehe, dass du als den Typ eines Hochsitzes im Namen angibst. Das ist so nicht im Sinne des Erfinders.
Vielleicht findest du unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhunting_stand mehr Informationen, darüber was du eintragen kannst und willst.

Für Unterwegs bietet sich die App StreetComplete an.
Nakaner (2025-12-01 10:46:34+00:00): Hallo NdwMan,

als Namen erfassen wir nur Eigennamen. Siehe hierzu auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#Namen_sind_keine_Beschreibungen

Viele Grüße

Michael
ziomio (2025-11-28 14:20:20+00:00): https://www.parmatoday.it/attualita/Terna-demolizione-tralicci.html
edobenfe (2025-11-29 12:58:58+00:00): Ciao, per curiosità, come hai fatto a determinare il tracciato del cavo sotterraneo?
ziomio (2025-11-30 10:01:51+00:00): Ciao, allora, non lo conosco con la certezza del 100%, ma un conoscente che lavora per una ditta che esegue quei lavori li, mi ha detto che fanno il percorso più breve e stanno in prossimità delle strade, in modo che siano facilmente accessibili, in caso di guasto e che non passano mai sotto gli edifici
edobenfe (2025-12-04 20:41:05+00:00): Capito, grazie mille per la spiegazione!
Benoît C MdP (2025-12-02 10:35:31+00:00): Bonjour Léo_MdP,

Effectivement, le niveau secondaire pour ce type de voie est plutôt adapté. Mais on a à présent un axe principal qui se transforme en section courante en axe secondaire. On pourrait passer Marquès en "axe principal" pour assurer la liaison avec le périph.

Très bonne continuation

Benoît
cheatach (2025-11-29 02:01:52+00:00): hej, usunąłeś sporo landuse=residential spod domów przy głównej drodze, to umyślnie?
k2101 (2025-12-01 07:52:11+00:00): Cześć, 
tak, jeśli nie jest to skomplikowana operacja, to usuwam niepoprawnie wrysowany landuse i z kolejnymi edycjami dodaję nowy.
cheatach (2025-12-02 01:47:24+00:00): czyli zamierzasz coś dać pod tymi domami? Bo jakiś landuse być powinien