piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-23 04:47:39+00:00): Czemu skasowałeś https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9937182/history ?

Czy jesteś pewien że teraz rowery mogą tu w lewo skręcać?

Ostatnio jak tam byłem to był pas do jazdy na wprost i skręt w lewo był dla rowerów nielegalny
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-23 04:50:00+00:00): Z drugą relacją - nie pamiętam tego, ale jesteś pewien że tam tak można jechać?
Bartek444 (2025-07-23 14:49:59+00:00): obie relacje zmieniłem po wizycie na miejscu. buły dowieszone tabliczki "nie dotyczy rowerów" oraz piktogramy na jezdniach.
To było we wrześniu 2024 więc obecnie może być inaczej.
emvee (2024-09-12 20:10:03+00:00): Drie toegevoegde parkeerplaatsen, wat beter was geweest is dat in plaats van "ik heb dit even toegevoegt, vind je dit goed eggie" het commit commentaar had geweest "drie parkeerplaatsen toegevoegd".

Wat betreft de 2 x 3 parkeerplaatsen, normaal is om de hele parkeerplaats incl. de toegangsweg(en) als één object te mappen, voor een voorbeeld zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1315189359 en https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=156544875
mtmail (2024-09-14 21:00:59+00:00): Similar to my other changeset comment there's some places having an 'ELVIS' tag. Is that 'ref:ELVIS' or does that have another meaning? The Overpass query is:
[out:json];(node["ELVIS"];way["ELVIS"];>;rel["ELVIS"];);out meta;
mtmail (2024-09-14 20:58:57+00:00): I see the changeset was part of an import. It created some tags starting with OSM_ (I'm looking at a list on https://osm.janmichel.eu/taginfo/newkeys.htm). Not many but I wanted to make you aware. Greetings.
aceman444 (2024-09-18 21:43:44+00:00): Zdravim, podla mna nazov NAY je na obchodoch s velkymi pismenami.
Rick Richards (2024-09-19 14:36:24+00:00): Zdravím, áno súhlasím, potom sa ale predajne NAY zobrazujú ako "outdated_tags:noncanonical_brand" vyžadujúci opravu tagu "name". Upravil som názov na "NAY" priamo v name-suggestion-indexe na githube, takže po naloadovani do OSM sa brand už bude zobrazovať správne ako "NAY".
aceman444 (2024-09-29 16:10:19+00:00): Super, dakujem.
Ano tusil som, ze zase nejaky vymysel editora iD. brand a name nemusia byt rovnake, ved naco by potom boli rozne znacky :) Otazka skor je, ci by NAY nemal byt velkym aj v 'brand', kedze sa tak firma aj vola aj to ma tak vsade na stranke. Ale to by musel niekto upratat na wikipedii aj wikidata a kedze neviem co je spravne, to nebudem riesit. Ale do 'name' ide idealne to, co je vidiet na objekte v realite.
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-06 19:51:37+00:00): Doing good, man!  Keep it up!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156544400
mat (2025-02-14 20:04:41+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez noté une réouverture au 2024-12-21, est-ce que la route a finalement rouvert ?
Colin Smale (2024-09-13 18:34:35+00:00): Hi Trevor,
Can you tell me what your source is for this edit? The boundary is now deviating significantly from OS surveyed data around the southern end of Blackfriars Bridge.
gscholz (2024-09-16 10:55:40+00:00): Hi Agh,
this changeset has created a lot of errors as you assigned a "stream" value to every single node of several waterways:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=156544750

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
SekeRob (2024-09-20 04:26:42+00:00): Multiple italian comments on more edit sets doing same, hitting 100K nodes. Time to run the reverter.
gscholz (2024-09-20 05:43:46+00:00): Seem reasonable.
emersonveenstra (2024-09-20 12:25:01+00:00): Hi there,

This is definitely not a type=route. type=route relations have a defined starting and ending point, and the ways, when ordered correctly, form a complete, unbroken line. 

What you are doing is called "Tagging for the renderer" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer) and it is not good practice to do, since it usually leads to people incorrectly using tags
c0nsumer (2024-09-20 12:29:06+00:00): Hey there. Hmm. How would you suggest tagging this, then? Perhaps as a series of individual routes aggregated into a superrelation?

I get what you're saying about tagging for the renderer, but at the same time, this is how the effectively-official maps show things. With the change you'd made the City of Troy became a hole in the map. And the same would happen for the other nearby cities if the same was done there.
jumbanho (2024-09-20 15:20:19+00:00): There would be no reason to create a super relation.  Each continuous linear route should have its own relation and leave it as that.  Obviously, you should have the actual infrastructure tagged on the individual ways (like cycleway=lane or cycleway=shared_lane)

The renderings you cite are not official in any way, they are just ones that are present on main OSM site.
c0nsumer (2024-09-20 15:27:58+00:00): Hmm. So a series of relations all with the same name, with each relation representing the contiguous section? That's doable...
jumbanho (2024-09-20 22:44:11+00:00): I would only create the relations if they are named/numbered linear routes.  If this is just  "Troy bike network" then I would not use relations at all; I would simply tag the infrastructure.
c0nsumer (2024-09-21 10:30:47+00:00): Thanks for that feedback, jumbanho. Can you tell me how you'd see that in practice?

These are signed routes throughout the cityas detailed here: https://cityoftroy.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=99335e6e8f7c47718a3824a99a79d1cf

I'll be updating this in the future as they've added more signs, but it's all considered by the city to be a singular bicycle route.
jumbanho (2024-09-22 13:41:20+00:00): I think what I would do, if there are no numbered/named routes would be to add lcn=yes and maybe cycle_network=US:MI:Troy on each of the ways that are currently in the network.  I would not use a route relation for ways that are not a route.
jtracey (2024-09-12 20:29:07+00:00): resolves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4406071
trial (2025-09-12 11:08:14+00:00): Bonjour, pour la rue Lancelot du Lac il manque :  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43450940 (vérifié sur le cadastre).
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-12 20:40:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Bolesławice":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304612244
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1315194620

"Tomkowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1315194616

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
DerSeegurke (2024-09-15 20:05:28+00:00): Hi Lodda!
Hast du hier absichtlich das gut getaggte Gebäude von "Haus Felsenhof" gelöscht und durch ein neues ohne Tags ersetzt? Meines Wissens gibt es die Einrichtung dort noch.
Langlaeufer (2024-09-17 15:08:27+00:00): Hallo Viola,
vorsicht mit bicycle=use_sidepath. Du dafst es nicht zusammen mit cycleway=track verwenden sondern nur, wenn die Radwege als separate Linie gezeichnet sind. Anderenfalls wird die Straße inklusive Radweg vom Router vermieden.
QC3 Construction (2024-09-14 07:25:51+00:00): Hi,

Limit the size of your change logs, can't be across the entire world for 5 changes
ray331 (2024-09-14 10:33:23+00:00): Why is that?
fortera_au (2024-09-15 23:10:03+00:00): Makes it hard for anyone to review, changesets should be local, and even approved automated edits generally should try to be kept to areas at once.

It also makes it seem like you've just done a Control-F for the wrong spelling and replaced it, without any kind of manual check, which is still counted as an automated edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156546432
Hufkratzer (2024-09-13 19:38:13+00:00): Hi,
wieso hast du https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/853245574 von Reitplatz (leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian= auf Reitanlage (leisure=horse_riding) umgetaggt? Das sieht doch aus wie ein Reitplatz - und nicht wie eine Reitanlage im Sinne von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding. 

Die kleine runde Fläche https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1315203402 hast du auch als Reitanlage getaggt; das ist aber wohl ein Round-Pen/Longierzirkel und diese werden in OSM normalerweise auch als Reitplätze getaggt.

Diese beiden Flächen gehören vermutlich zu https://leas-reitschule.de; das wäre dann also die komplette Reitanlage, die man als zusätzliches Objekt (Knoten oder Fläche) mit leisure=horse_riding mappen könnte. Hier ist so eine ähnliche Anlage: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/819394927
SuperMarkus (2024-09-14 16:42:01+00:00): @Hufkratzer: Ach so. Dann habe ich wohl einen Fehler gemacht. Du scheinst dich da besser auszukennen. Wärst du so gut und passt die Tags an?
Hufkratzer (2024-09-14 20:45:42+00:00): erledigt
SuperMarkus (2024-09-14 20:47:40+00:00): Danke!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-12 21:30:54+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1021242545

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-09-13 08:21:44+00:00): Dag reusje  Waarom amenity=bench veranderd in leisure=bench?

Waar staat dat in de wiki?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-13 08:22:51+00:00): Bedoel je wellicht leisure=picnic_table?
reusje (2024-09-13 08:36:54+00:00): Je hebt helemaal gelijk, zie dat het bij "andere" bankjes wel goed is gegaan. Begrijp even niet waarom deze anders/mis is, zal deze aanpassen (bench, geen picnic table).
eggie (2024-09-13 08:56:22+00:00): JOSM kent auto aanvullen.  Ook als je iets een keer verkeerd hebt getypt blijft dat hardnekkig verkeerd aanvullen. 
Zoiets zal het wel zijn.
Mapse
eggie
Wanderer2000 (2024-09-13 06:44:31+00:00): Hi JVT, in the Netherlands we don't tag the address on the building outline, since it is already present on the address node. Outdoor seating is also not relevant for this building

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156557529
eggie (2024-09-13 08:26:15+00:00): Ik heb  notor_vehicle=no verwijderd van het paaltje. Dat hoort niet en geeft problemen met moped en mofa.
horse=yes zal haast niet of de ruiter moet door de berm gaan. Dat zou kunnen. Ruiters mogen niet op fietspaden.

MVG
eggie
TrickyFoxy (2024-09-14 11:12:07+00:00): Вы снова (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127691473) используете Bing. И на этот раз нарисовали реку по её весеннему руслу. Используйте другие доступные снимки!
mtmail (2024-09-14 20:54:15+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Currently you're adding all data UPPERCASE and with tag names nobody else uses. We're a community and such data is hard to work with.  It would be best to familiarize yourself with the OpenStreetMap data and tagging schema and contact a local gruop of OpenStreetMap users to coordinate your additions. https://openstreetmap.community/?map=5.41196,-57.67516&zoom=4.75
eggie (2024-09-13 08:37:39+00:00): Hi Ayumu

This think it's only a plan.   


The realisation of the A4-South is not included in the Multi-Year Programme for Infrastructure, Space and Transport (MIRT), the planning document of the national government.
Greetz,
eggie
JeroenvanderGun (2024-09-13 10:57:41+00:00): AFAIK the space is reserved for a highway here (and has been for decades) but there are no specific designs or plans for building it, so highway=proposed is currently premature.

If this is an older design, than you could perhaps use e.g. abandoned:highway=proposed and source=* to specify where the design comes from.
ObscureAngel (2024-09-19 16:01:39+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour votre contribution !

Il semble que StreetComplete vous ait fait quelques misère.

Essayez au maximum de conserver des ensemble de modifications locaux.

Pour éviter les conflits et par courtoisie envers les vérificateurs, il est recommandé de :
• combiner les modifications dans une petite zone géographique (au sein d'une ville, d'un département ou d'une région)
• télécharger/enregistrer les modifications avant de passer dans une autre zone de la carte

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Groupes_de_modifications#Taille_g%C3%A9ographique_des_groupes_de_modifications

Merci beaucoup, passez une bonne journée et bonne cartographie ! :-)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 05:01:15+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=kebabçı
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12173756439/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=kebab
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
kakiremora (2024-09-15 21:55:53+00:00): Dzień Dobry,
dublowanie przystanków zostało tutaj zastosowane głównie po to, aby każda z relacji miała odpowiednią nazwę przystanku w sobie. Chwilowo nie ma lepszej metody, która byłaby ustandaryzowana lub używana.

Pozdrawiam
kakiremora
muralito (2024-11-15 01:02:34+00:00): Hola. ¿Cual sería sentido la etiqueta old_name:es cuando no hay una name:es?
Davileci (2024-11-15 07:02:05+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas#%C2%BFQu%C3%A9_otras_propiedades_podr%C3%ADa_dar_al_nodo?
muralito (2024-11-15 16:26:28+00:00): Si, eso lo lo habia visto. Entonces es un nombre español en desuso, y actualmente ese elemento no tiene nombre en español, ¿estoy interpretando bien?
Davileci (2024-11-15 18:53:29+00:00): Este es un tema polémico; pero existe cierto consenso, sobre todo en la comunidad catalana, en que el nombre en español es el nombre oficial en España.
Parece que el enlace anterior no se abre en la sección concreta donde se refleja esto: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_españolas#¿Qué_otras_propiedades_podría_dar_al_nodo?
muralito (2024-11-15 20:54:25+00:00): Mi pregunta no era especifica por el idioma name:es, o si etiquetar en español, en catalan, o en ambos a la vez. La reformulo de forma generica, ¿es correcto etiquetar (cualquier) "old_name" sin el "name" correspondiente? y me respondo, en la wiki no exige que haya un "name", aunque sugiere que es lo habitual...

Entonces, la wiki lo permite, de acuerdo. ¿y como lo interpreto?¿tuvo de nombre el valor de old_name:es y por la causa que fuese dejo de tener nombre en español y no existe nada para etiquetar en el name:es?
Davileci (2024-11-15 21:53:24+00:00): Sí, existe, coincide con el topónimo oficial en valenciano: "USE L'Alqueria d'Asnar" (https://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/30253/1/TesauroToponimos2004.pdf, página 22).
muralito (2024-11-15 23:44:25+00:00): Gracias por el dato. Lo que voy a decir importa poco porque no es el foco, pero dentro de las fuentes consultadas ese Tesauro declara en Uruguay INE.gub.uy y te puedo confirmar personalmente que es uno de los que usamos en OSM porque era de lo poco libre que habia alrededor del 2010, a nivel de las ciudades mas grandes esta correcto y no tiene diferencias con la realidad, pero con los años le he encontrado diferencias en cursos de agua, nombres de parajes y areas rurales, etc.
Davileci (2024-11-16 01:10:30+00:00): No es solo eso, hay más argumentos en las referencias del apartado [¿Qué otras propiedades podría dar al nodo?](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas#%C2%BFQu%C3%A9_otras_propiedades_podr%C3%ADa_dar_al_nodo?) de las Directrices de etiquetado españolas.
Davileci (2024-11-16 01:12:35+00:00): El problema es que no sé cómo compartir por aquí el enlace a la susodicha sección.
violavoelker (2024-09-12 23:59:43+00:00): #lgmaps
eggie (2024-09-13 11:07:20+00:00): Hi Esri is not a satellite picture but an outdated aerial imagery.

Greetz..
eggie
OptikalCrow (2024-09-17 00:26:36+00:00): I need to resurvey but it was my understanding that this section of Main Street would be closed for redevelopment for a significant period of time - see https://www.lynchburgva.gov/875/Downtown-Renewal-Construction-Project.

Like I said, I need to get out there and update the check date but last time I was down there a couple weeks ago it was still closed.
Joseph R P (2024-09-17 02:01:06+00:00): It looks like the entire project will be going for another two years, but in multiple phases that have subphases with closures of sections of Main Street that will last no more than a few of months each. This is considered "short-term" on the highway=construction tag documentation page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction). 

I think the better way of going about this, if we want to avoid the problems cause by moving the highway=construction tags around the street every handful of months, would be to use access=* tags. This requires the effort of tagging each phase correctly, though. I think many people would agree, however, to leave it as primary since road closures like these are more subject to conditions than a project like rebuilding a bridge or paving a new road—but I think it may be better to have which sections are closed properly indicated.
OptikalCrow (2024-09-17 02:15:52+00:00): Sounds good. I'll forward this on to the local group and we can talk about the best practice for this redevelopment project. Thanks!
Kevin67 (2025-02-02 11:08:04+00:00): Keeping an eye on Way: 1315228335. Whatever happens (development) on that land, I'm sceptical it will be a simple public roadway.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 03:55:16+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165052548
Daniil Musatov (2024-09-29 11:25:45+00:00): Добрый день! Подскажите, это якорь у ДК новый появился, вместо стелы в честь Комсомола? Ниже у поклонного креста якорь остался?
MapGrid (2024-09-13 05:36:39+00:00): Ky_AT, you broke Lake Saint Clair with this edit.
You added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/945926982#map=15/42.57549/-82.61028&layers=ND with an inner role to the Lake Saint Clair Relation.  It shares nodes with one of the outer ways. JOSM error is "Multipolygon outer way shares segment with other ring".
Ky_AT (2024-09-13 16:22:40+00:00): Hi MapGrid, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
MapGrid (2024-09-13 17:17:09+00:00): Ky_AT,  you fixed the issue in changeset 156567714 at 07:36 Eastern Daylight Time (almost 6 hours ago). Thank you for that.  I am not sure there is really any more analysis to do.  Everything is fine now.
Ky_AT (2024-09-16 10:23:16+00:00): Hi MapGrid, 

Thank you for the quick notice and happy mapping.
GUFSZ (2024-09-13 04:26:25+00:00): Der Nutzer 309_308_307 hat als mp747474 einen 10 jährigen Block bekommen https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15881 nachdem er in einer Diskussion mit mir durchgedreht ist. Davor hat er seinen account glasklar_eiskalt gelöscht, weil er in einer Diskussion mit mir durchgedreht ist und sich eine kurze Sperre eingefangen hat. Er hat auf meinen Einwand vermutlich vorsichtshalber nicht reagiert, also muss ich ihn leider unhöflich mit einem Revert überfahren.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 03:55:17+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165052548
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 06:44:09+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164576198
KelsonV (2024-09-13 05:00:35+00:00): Forgot to add: Surveyed with GPX trace through civic center.
ivanbranco (2024-09-16 10:06:12+00:00): Hi setokynet,

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/181954616

seems like something went wrong with this and other segments of this road, the wikimedia_commons=* value is a wikipedia link, not a wikimedia commons one. Could you take a look at it? Thanks and good mapping
Martinligabue (2024-09-13 20:24:34+00:00): reverted, as this isn't a turn restriction but a no access
Filip009 (2024-09-14 20:12:52+00:00): Zdravím, keď to chcete mať fakt pekne do oblúka, odpoúčam klávesovú skratku "O" a na vytváranie nových bodov skratku Shift+C.
aceman444 (2025-02-02 22:45:30+00:00): Dakujeme, ale prosim neposuvajte body kde sa cesty rozvetvuju na nespravne pozicie (napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8485807419 ). Oddelenie ma byt az kde je nemozne odbocit, je tam fyzicka zabrana alebo uz uplne rozdelene cesty srafovanim. Nie len obycajna plna ciara. Pozrite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes#Motorway_with_lanes_and_destinations .
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-14 11:13:45+00:00): Please use changeset comments explaining what was done.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156556108
CoyKoi (2024-09-15 06:45:22+00:00): Hi mapnerd, thanks for adding detail to OSM.
Please can you use more meaningful changeset comments when you publish your changest, as it helps other contributors who are reviewing your changes. See the OSM wiki page here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156556417
eggie (2024-09-13 08:52:32+00:00): Dag Yhijs...  unclassified lijkt me inderdaad beter. Ik heb wel dat doorsteekje weer toegevoegd als highway=path.
De voorgaande mapper was ikzelf .
Groet
eggie
jandar22 (2024-09-18 13:24:50+00:00): Hi, I have removed the description=* tag added as part of this changeset as it violates OSM policy on advertisements. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description#No_advertising for more info. Reverted with changeset #156773391
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-06 02:55:43+00:00): Cleaned up and consolidated SEO spam tags and split POI and building for Two Men and a Truck POIs in South Bend in changeset 183720655

https://osm.org/changeset/183720655
ObscureAngel (2024-09-27 09:53:03+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre contribution :-)

J'ai revert ce changement, l'attribut name=* ne doit contenir que le nom du POI.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Names#Name_est_juste_le_nom

Bonne journée et bonne cartographie :-D
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156557530
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2024-09-27 10:51:25+00:00): Bonjour  ObscureAngel, 
merci pour votre action, 
C'était une erreur de notre part .
Bonne journée
Alain
ObscureAngel (2024-09-27 12:14:37+00:00): Pas de soucis :)
pavvv (2024-09-13 08:47:51+00:00): That exists already https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9956479890
Numbergod (2024-09-13 07:43:42+00:00): The LINZ buildings weren't there, so it made no sense to continue.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156559246
Russ McD (2025-01-24 06:05:53+00:00): Any reason why the Province prefix has been added to some of this road, but not all of it ....
which is wrong anyway, as Thai National roads DO NOT CARRY a province prefix.  Please amend along with any others you have changed in a similar manner.
PaulHaag (2025-01-30 14:42:34+00:00): I saw this in the WikiProject Thailand

Rural roads should be tagged with ref=pf.nnnn where pf is the provincial prefix in Thai characters, followed by a dot, followed by the
numerical portion of the reference number. There should be no spaces in the ref tag value.
PaulHaag (2025-01-30 14:44:41+00:00): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Thailand