piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bitsu (2025-01-29 17:57:27+00:00): I have missed it to view closely in streetview that the road is closed  and the google reflects the imaginary road with out street view so i have created it OSM by the imaginary road reflection and thanks for feedback
addyx (2025-02-02 15:07:52+00:00): It's really nice that you responded.
Due to such issues, generally, it's better to avoid armchair mapping. Add the only data which you have surveyed yourself. Then there is less chance of bad data going into maps.

BTW, using Google sources for creating maps in OSM is illegal. You may want to keep it in mind as OSMF enforces this quite strictly.
comfyquiettree (2025-01-28 14:47:53+00:00): *source=aerial
dvdhoven (2025-01-28 16:09:35+00:00): Gekleurde routes mogen nooit lid gemaakt worden van het wandelnetwerk Arnhem-Nijmegen.
Dat leidt tot onoplosbare fouten in knooppuntnet.nl
Daar staat de rode route nu in een aantal foutmeldingen omdat knooppuntnet.nl denkt dat het een netwerkroute is.
Alleen routes en knopen met network:type=node_network mogen lid zijn van het netwerk.
Kijk anders ook eens bij Nijmegen, daar zul je zien dat de gekleurde routes gewoon los zijn en geen lid van het netwerk.
Ik heb de paarse en groene route uit het netwerk gehaald
Zandkuil (2025-01-28 16:22:18+00:00): Bedankt voor het corrigeren, ik haalde het toevoegen van die tag blijkbaar even door de war met het toevoegen van tags aan de knooppuntenroutes.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 03:26:51+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165094504
eggie (2025-01-28 15:16:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Ik heb het aangepast naar een laadpaal voor ebikes.
bicycle=yes motor_vehicle=no
capacity=4

Heet de paal daadwerkelijk Ebike Charger? 
Denk dat die naam beter weg kan of description gebruiken ipv name. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Felix van de Donk (2025-01-28 22:52:01+00:00): Dankjewel Eggie.

De reden om hem ebike charger te noemen was omdat als ik op soort ging zoeken ik alleen vehicle charging station kon vinden. En ik wilde geen verwarring zaaien dat het hier ging om een auto laadstation.

Je feedback is goed, ik denk dat we hem met die wijzigingen er goed in kunnen zetten
eggie (2025-01-29 08:12:17+00:00): Oke, begrijpelijk... maar de consensus is om geen name=... te gebruiken bij beschrijvingen.
Het is aan de kaartenmaker om wat met de info bicycle=yes en motor_vehicle=no te doen.
Zo zijn met een 'trucje' door te zoeken  onder 'overige'  in de Openfietsmap voor Garmins bv fietsenmakers (reparatiebedrijf) te vinden en knooppunten. (communicatie)
De laadpunten zijn te vinden bij Tankstations. Ook weer handig als je fietsband leegraakt of als je water nodig hebt. 
In Duitsland heb ik trouwens al ebikers gezien die gewoon laden bij een autolaadpaal. 
Die hebben die stekker gewoon bij zich. 

Hier wat leesvoer hoe o.a. om te gaan met name=

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice#Zet_het_niet_op_de_kaart_voor_de_renderer
eggie (2025-01-28 15:24:41+00:00): Feedback Ik heb nog emergency=yes toegevoegd aan de slagboom en het hek.

MVG
eggie
Peret (2025-11-27 18:41:43+00:00): No se puede considerar una autopista una vía sin calzadas separadas, con cruces al mismo nivel y con acceso a fincas colindantes únicamente por el hecho de que sea de peaje.
eggie (2025-01-28 15:28:14+00:00): Welkom bij OSM   Wat is de bedoeling van deze wijziging met commentaar mapa?
Het is onduidelijk wat je bedoeling is/was. 
Je wijziging zet ik voorlopig weer terug. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-01-28 15:29:44+00:00): reverted by changeset #161862210
yelisey90 (2025-01-28 15:31:21+00:00): What for? Per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dattraction and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:attraction , this tag should not be added if the object is part of a larger attraction (Mtatsminda Park in this case).
yelisey90 (2025-01-31 08:09:38+00:00): no response => reverted
Marek-M (2025-01-28 16:32:16+00:00): Cześć, do POI albo dodawaj pełny adres albo w ogóle. Tutaj dodałeś tylko nazwę ulicy i jest to nieprawidłowe. Usunę tą zbędną informację.
Supaplex (2025-01-29 04:14:53+00:00): 由於你的變更集使用不相容OpenStreetMap的授權，因此被回退。

詳情見社群討論區文章：https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/124651

如果累犯將送交 Data Working Group

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161881432
iigmir (2025-01-29 04:20:03+00:00): 您好：
國土測繪圖資服務雲的地圖（NLSC），目前只授權低解析度圖層。使用iD繪圖的話，請使用該圖層。高解析度圖層地圖（http://maps.nlsc.gov.tw）有著作權，不可用於 OSM 繪製：

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/124651
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright

OSM 社群近日已決議在著作權方面採取零容忍政策。任何違反著作權的繪製會被回退，屢犯者會被 Data Working Group 處分。

這不是開玩笑。您的編輯已經被注意到，請認真看待：
https://t.me/OSMTaiwan/20033

若您有任何問題，請使用 OSM 社群討論。謝謝。
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/tw/42
https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
https://t.me/OSMTaiwan
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 03:26:52+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165094504
s777n (2025-01-28 16:09:58+00:00): Здравствуйте.

Когда вы рисуете пожалуйста не забывайте двигать спутниковые снимки. У них может быть достаточно большое смещение и объекты будут нарисованы где-то в стороне.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%98%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B0%D1%8D%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2

Bing в большинстве мест это старые снимки и лучше попереключать слои (иконка справа) и найти более свежий снимок. В большинстве случаев esri будет свежее но не всегда.
s777n (2025-01-28 16:19:03+00:00): Здравствуйте.

Вы удалили тег здания со здания.

Если это здания изначально построено под детский сад то можно указать building=kindergarten

Для того чтобы указать что там сейчас находится детский сад используется amenity=kindergarten
НО лучше вешать теги детского сада не на здание а на территорию детского сада или обозначить его точкой https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Dkindergarten

Теги здания и детского сада могут не совпадать. Например детский сад может находится в жилом доме. Тогда на здании будет building=apartments а на территории или точке amenity=kindergarten
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-30 18:47:14+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173990968
vgnssmedia (2025-01-28 16:25:33+00:00): yes i agree this is correct
Jakka (2025-01-28 16:52:03+00:00): De naamgeving staat reeds op het volledig gebied van school is onnodig dit te herhalen op gebouw zelf. Dit voorkomt dubbele codering en statistiek.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232294777#map=18/50.970282/4.388423
Shelsa (2025-01-28 16:35:12+00:00): *OSM
DaveF (2025-01-29 20:08:49+00:00): Hi
Why have you done that?
pigsonthewing (2025-01-29 23:20:07+00:00): Because they have different metadata. The organisation is not listed; the website does not represent the building; there are two Wikidata items; etc.
HellMap (2025-01-29 17:56:43+00:00): Lūdzu uzmanīgāk liec vērtības StreetComplete.

Šeit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1289721701 nav sidewalk=left - abās pusēs ir ietve.

Šeit ietve atsevišķi iezīmēta abās pusēs https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33620626

Šeit ietve atsevišķi iezīmēta 
vienā pusē https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1118388973

Šeit ceļa sākumā ir ietve https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93946077

Šeit gar slimnīcu ir ietve https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93946125

Šeit īsā posmā ir ietve, pat ar gājēju pāreju https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136445732

Lūdzu izlabo kļūdas.
HellMap (2025-02-08 19:39:51+00:00): Atbildi nesagaidīju un kļūdas nav izlabotas, bet tu jau kartē citur, tāpēc izmaiņu atcēlu.
yelisey90 (2025-01-28 17:27:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13443170 ?
evgenykatyshev (2025-01-28 17:38:19+00:00): Deleted the my duplicate
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-28 16:50:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/360153381

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 05:12:43+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164660516
dknelson9876 (2025-02-04 04:05:51+00:00): Hi Blatherskyt, welcome to OpenStreetMap, and mapping in Utah! We're happy to have you. 

I'm concerned about the changes you've made here, because "West 600 North Street" is not a typical street name in Utah. I would expect that the street sign actually says just "600 North"? For more information about how the local community has decided to handle Utah street names, check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions 

I also see in your other changes that you traced entire properties and labeled them as buildings. Please note that if you know an address for a building, but cannot draw the building itself, it's preferable to add a single node/point to assign the address to, until we get updated imagery that shows the building.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-28 17:11:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436001963

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
disc24 (2025-02-05 10:35:23+00:00): Hallo,
ich glaube, Du hast bei Deinen Änderungen veraltete Sat-Bilder verwendet. Speziell bei dieser Strasse hier. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1230624945
Die Strasse ist verlegt worden und war schon richtig eingetragen.
Viele Grüße
Dirk
Schlumpfhasenbär (2025-02-05 10:42:12+00:00): Opps, das ist/war keine Absicht. Ich bin den Radweg komplett gefahren, und hatte an mehreren Stellen festgestellt das so einiges nicht stimmt... das haatte ich versucht im Nachhinein zu korrigieren. Scheinbar ist mir dabei auch vielleicht der ein oder andere Fehler unterlaufen. Bitte wieder richtig mappen. Grüße, Christian
disc24 (2025-02-05 10:58:35+00:00): Hallo Christian,
kein Problem, korrigiere ich.
An der Stelle sind auch Rad- und Fussweg aufgeteilt worden. Das hatte ich auch noch auf der Liste. Leider gabs noch kein Sat-Bild dafür bisher.
Schlumpfhasenbär (2025-02-06 17:04:04+00:00): Hallo Dirk, ich habs geändert, auch Fuß und Radweg.... Habe aktuelles satbild gefunden.... NRW vDOP.... Grüße! :-)
michaelthehutt (2025-01-28 17:22:57+00:00): also, I removed the railway that was marked on there. It is nowhere in sight.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-02-06 13:36:15+00:00): I think that name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12331025 should be West Bank, not Jordanian West Bank. Can you fix this one?
ASMapper (2025-02-07 07:12:25+00:00): Hi,
As this relation didn’t have a name, I tried to find a suitable name for it. This relation is meant to show the borders of the West Bank when it was annexed by Jordan, and not the West Bank in general or today. Thus, I decided to call it «Jordanian West Bank» just to distinguish the two. There are probably better names though.
Regrds,
eggie (2025-01-28 19:47:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
rskedgell (2025-01-28 20:17:24+00:00): Hi, just to let you know that if a segment of highway already has cycleway:both=* or cycleway:left=* + cycleway:right=*, then a cycleway=yes tag is likely to conflict when data consumers try to process the way.

There's some documentation on the OpenStreetMap wiki here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway
Glassman (2025-01-29 00:39:35+00:00): I can't find that peak on USGS maps. Can you point me to the source
Allison P (2025-01-29 01:11:58+00:00): I don't think the peak is named in GNIS, but it looks like a local name in use: https://www.peakbagger.com/peak.aspx?pid=17030
Glassman (2025-01-29 03:54:03+00:00): I received the same information from another user. When I saw the name it jumped out at me as a prank and I wanted it removed if it was. I guess not. :-)
IsaacLeman (2025-01-29 04:55:49+00:00): Glassman - as Allison P linked to, my source is Peakbagger, as well as listsofjohn.com, summitpost.org, and other hiking/climbing sources.  From what I can tell, the climbing community has used this name since the 1980’s, potentially the original source is a Fred Beckey climbing guide.  This name was given due to the peak’s ordinance between Bettys Pass and Jug Lake.  Definitely didn’t intend to add it as a prank!  As one of Washington’s 800 most prominent peaks, I just felt that the name should be reflected on OSM.
SekeRob repair (2025-01-28 17:43:57+00:00): PS

Added the tax office name used as official_name
aceman444 (2025-05-18 19:41:23+00:00): Hi, what is the source of these addresses? You cannot see them on Ortofotomozaika images.
Always quote your source.

Some of the addresses you added, like Granerova 1 do not yet exist in state register of addresses (register adries), nor cadastre map. So where did you get them from?

Also the "Žitvayova" street that you changed without any source, is called "Zsitvayova" in official city and state registers, see e.g. https://cdn-api.bratislava.sk/strapi-homepage/upload/VZN_Cunovo_f6e2119e54.pdf . Please provide some proof the spelling is like what you wrote.
IvanBabić (2025-01-29 21:42:06+00:00): Reverted because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161915113
felipeeugenio (2025-01-29 11:45:39+00:00): Hola Claudio. Los almacenes son =convenience. No supermarket.
Corregido.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161867423
felipeeugenio (2025-01-29 11:49:50+00:00): Esos son natural=tree. no parques.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161867520
felipeeugenio (2025-01-29 12:02:32+00:00): no es un supermercado, es un almacén.

saludos
felipeeugenio (2025-01-29 12:02:07+00:00): eliminado duplicado
felipeeugenio (2025-01-29 12:03:25+00:00): elimino duplicado
George Sears (2025-02-10 16:29:01+00:00): Da una ricognizione dell'area sembrerebbe che il nuovo binario verrà costruito a sinistra del binario già esistente
francrr (2025-02-10 16:39:27+00:00): Da quello che ho capito dal progetto sul sito del comune di Barletta sembra che il nuovo tracciato sia al centro del tracciato precedente in alcuni punti
George Sears (2025-02-10 17:00:43+00:00): Quello che ho visto sul luogo è che hanno espropriato terreni sul lato nord/ovest
Stanno anche rimuovendo i vecchi binari
francrr (2025-02-10 17:16:10+00:00): se vuoi puoi modificare, ho inserito il secondo binario in modo approssimativo per come ho interpretato il progetto
francrr (2025-02-10 17:16:29+00:00): con i due binari già tracciati dovrebbe essere più facile aggiustare qualche inaccuratezza
George Sears (2025-02-10 17:45:14+00:00): Direi meglio aspettare per adesso, così poi si possono sistemare anche i landuse in modo definitivo
felipeeugenio (2025-01-29 12:04:27+00:00): elimino duplicado
CurlingMan13 (2025-05-29 06:11:37+00:00): I'm glad to see you diving into relations, but quick note regarding the name=* tag....

Don't use ALL CAPS for bus stop names.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12539615447


Please review:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Good_practice:~:text=or%20likely%20mistakes%3F-,Capitalisation,-Names%20are%20adapted
Szymson (2025-01-30 18:53:34+00:00): Skąd taka nazwa?
czebureks (2025-01-30 20:06:14+00:00): Jest tabliczka; nazwa dobrze udokumentowana też w internecie
eerib (2025-01-28 21:18:11+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for your first edit Diggydug.

Unfortunately, this edit goes against OpenStreetMap policies and therefore has been reverted by changeset #161874013.

Please refer to the following wiki page for details entitled "Why can't I delete this trail?"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

Thank you, eerib
JeroenHoek (2025-01-29 07:47:25+00:00): Ja, maar let op!

https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=voorstraat+110+kollum&objectId=0079200000372304&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=206056.99800000002&geometry.y=588451.3325&zoomlevel=15

Zie je dat 110A een winkelfunctie en 110 een woonfunctie?

Ik had de Blokker bewust op 110A gehouden, de lijst op de website lijkt het fout te hebben.
lyctkel (2025-01-29 09:34:11+00:00): Hi JeroenHoek,
Dat was mijn fout. Ik ging ervan uit dat de website correct was en dat de nummers 110 en 110A door elkaar waren gehaald bij het in kaart brengen. In alle winkels die ik tot nu toe in kaart heb gebracht, was het huisnummer zonder letter en hadden de flats erboven wel een letter.
Bedankt voor de hint, ik heb het gecorrigeerd.
AndyB_66 (2025-01-28 20:35:17+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
silversurfer83 (2025-01-28 20:34:35+00:00): Hi :)

thank you for switching to something different ;)

You added this highway here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1354984510 
how does it connect to other highways where motor vehicles are allowed? Because right now it's connected to the sidewalk where only pedestrians are allowed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161868999
Donut Master 🍩 (2025-01-30 18:45:57+00:00): Oops! Must been a mistake. Ill fix it! It actually leads to a parking. I didnt mean to do it a highway.
rodolfovargas (2025-02-16 21:26:52+00:00): Hola.

Me parece que no corresponde "daño, damage", porque están en situación de "emergencia", peligro, vulnerables. 
Evidentemente la etiqueta "emergency" no existe en los Tag de OSM, pero muy bien debería diferenciarse de destruido, que no es lo mismo vulnerable.
mueschel (2025-02-16 22:05:38+00:00): The tag "emergency" has a different meaning, it's not used to tag an abstract danger of some kind. That would be "hazard". Or, in the case of flooding, the common tag is "flood_prone".

If the buildings just were in danger of being flooded once, but nothing happened, then I'd say that this is nothing that belongs into OSM.
silversurfer83 (2025-01-28 20:36:16+00:00): looks good :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161869173
silversurfer83 (2025-01-28 20:37:51+00:00): if the name really is "Barber Shop" and the shop is really open Monday through Sunday from 8:30-14:30 + 16:30-21:00 everything is splendid
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161869223
Donut Master 🍩 (2025-01-30 18:44:08+00:00): Thanks silversurfer! I will check one time.
wielandb (2025-02-25 17:43:32+00:00): Hi!
The geometry modifications you made in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13775641 are not appropriate for the features on the ground. Those chicanes should not be modelled with geometry but instead by using the appropriate highway-Tags.
I reverted the geometry as best as I could.
YomanNH (2025-01-28 21:14:27+00:00): Cześć,
czy coś oddziela drogę dla rowerów od części pieszej w taki sposób, że nie można swobodnie przejść? Bo jeśli nie, to powinna to być jedna linia highway=path + bicycle=designated + foot=designated + segregated=yes zgodnie z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w
zuicz (2025-01-28 22:56:26+00:00): Na razie zmieniłem tagi z w budowie na gotową. Jak będę na miejscu to zobaczę i poprawię
Szymson (2025-01-28 18:55:20+00:00): +1
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-28 19:11:22+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9508458301

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
citrula (2025-01-28 20:25:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! This looks like it has been tagged correctly now, but I don't know the specifics about how, if, or when Facebook maps will reflect your changes.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-28 19:21:03+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12539741161

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-28 21:56:17+00:00): W warstwach możesz sobie włączyć podkład obrysów budynków. Jeżeli chcesz wyrównać kąty budynku to zamiast robić tak https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11230622719 to zaznacz obrys budynku i naciśnij Q
jogemu (2025-01-28 21:48:30+00:00): Is Vịnh Mexico more common than Vịnh México? If not I would propose:
name:vi=Vịnh México
alt_name:vi=Vịnh Mễ Tây Cơ;Vịnh Mễ;Vịnh Mexico;Vịnh Mê-hi-cô

In case you agree, could you do me a favor and change alt_name:he to name:he as well? I tried to encourage the mapper to do that and restore alt_name:vi themself in a private message. This learning opportunity for a somewhat experienced mapper meant that you changed it ahead of me. I hope that didn’t bother you and I will change alt_name:he myself if I am mistaken in my assumption that Vịnh México is more common.
Minh Nguyen (2025-01-28 22:11:47+00:00): Sorry, I didn’t realize I was getting in the middle of things. Another mapper reached out to me and asked me to take care of Vietnamese.

> Is Vịnh Mexico more common than Vịnh México?

It’s complicated. Vietnamese spelling of foreign place names is notoriously unstandardized, mostly a matter of personal preference. This goes for both the country and the gulf. In Vietnam, Mê-hi-cô is probably the most common “formal” name, being preferred by the government and in educational materials. However, in the U.S., the preferred formal name is Mễ Tây Cơ or Mễ. At this point, neither country understands the other country’s name at all. In both countries, Mexico is very common informally because it’s mutually intelligible and easier to type. Wikipedia’s approach is to use the Spanish name verbatim, which feels more learned: México.

Any of these names could reasonably be the name:vi=* on Mexico, but it’s currently México, so I guess the gulf could also use this spelling.
jogemu (2025-01-28 22:24:44+00:00): No, problem. Thank you for the explanation. Using the same spelling as the country relation seems logical. Adding Mexico to alt_name:vi of the country relation could be done as well. Since, I am not really qualified I can't make those decisions.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-28 19:21:06+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12539760845

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀