piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Katalysator (2024-05-27 10:15:07+00:00): Hallo Flo, ja das ist so beabsichtigt. Seit dem 23.05. kann das Stück der alten Detmolder Straße (B66) nicht mehr befahren werden. Weder von Bielefeld kommend, noch von Helpup kommend. Und auch nicht von Asemissen oder Oerlinghausen kommend. Dieses Teilstück wird wohl auch nach Abschluss der Bauarbeiten im Jahr 2025 nicht mehr so befahrbar sein, wie es bisher der Fall war. Das ist detaillierter hier aufgeführt: https://www.strassen.nrw.de/de/b66-ausbau-der-detmolder-strasse-in-asemissen-projektueberblick.html 
Löschen wollte ich die alte Straße zu diesem Zeitpunkt aber noch nicht, auch wenn die Asphaltdecke zum Teil abgetragen ist.

Man kan allerdings weiterhin zwischen Bielefeld und Helpup verkehren, nämlich über die südliche der beiden neu gebauten Spuren. 
Und das von dir aufgezeigte Rerouting (Rot-Grün-Vergleich) ist soweit auch korrekt, denn die Umgehung über die Allestraße+Gewerbestraße ist auch die offiziell ausgeschilderte Umgehung.

Wie benutzt man denn die von dir aufgezeigte Rot-Grün-Vergleichs-Funktion? Über die offizielle Startseite openstreetmap.org routen die Wegführungen noch über das alte Teilstück der B66.
flohoff (2024-05-27 14:58:42+00:00): 
Alles klar - Das mit dem Rot/Grün ist von mir gebaut. Da nehme ich NRW und berechne alle halbe stunde auf den neuen Daten ~250000 Routen und gucke ob die länger oder kürzer werden.

Hier sieht man die Punkte zwischen denen ich berechne und die Wege die dabei genommen werden:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/#52.15256,8.615,12z

Das mache ich jetzt schon ~10 Jahre - Wenn dann sich was verändert kommen mails:

Hier z.b. die für diese änderung:

https://gt.owl.de/pipermail/osm-owl-routeqa/2024-May/093303.html

Der listet mir dann immer schon die Changesets auf die in frage kommen.

Flo
Frans S (2024-05-28 10:11:30+00:00): Hello. 
Please use the correct highway tag in urban areas.  No 'service' tag where the street is giving access to houses.
Please consult this wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
Best regards
chris2map (2024-05-28 20:27:27+00:00): Hello, thanks for the note! I tried to distinguish public streets from rudimentary accesses to one or two houses or facilities, from obvious private drive-ways. That's the way I'm used to. I'll give preference to "residential" highways rather than "service" highways.
L'imaginaire (2024-05-28 11:20:22+00:00): Beste Jaske,
In OpenStreetMap streven we ernaar om een object "in de echte wereld" slechts één keer te mappen (zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:One_feature,_one_OSM_element voor meer info). Met jouw wijzigingenset ga je op een aantal vlakken in tegen dat principe: zowel het café als het adres van het café komen er twee maal in voor. Een andere mapper heeft dit ondertussen rechtgezet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151872402
mcliquid (2024-05-31 10:24:32+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

In your case: Upload changes in StreetComplete before switching a continent / country.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Andrew Chadwick (2024-05-28 09:49:19+00:00): Oh drat. Have I been doing this all wrong?

I may have made the same mistake a few times locally. Sorry. Am I just imagining that it used to be good practice to tag the real-world stop lines before the traffic signals abstraction?

I'm hoping I find the time to repair it. I've bookmarked https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1M87 now for my own QA purposes, and I'll get on with fixing them (but feel free to dive in!)
John Veness (2024-05-28 09:59:50+00:00): Hi. To be honest, I'm no expert, but I read at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dstop that highway=stop means that traffic has to stop every time, regardless of traffic flow etc., which is not the case here. I'm not sure how to mark "this is the line where you should stop if the lights are red", but it's not highway=stop!

I was alerted because my sat nav said "Warning: Stop Sign" when I approached the roundabout, but there wasn't one.
ILoveToEatStreetSigns (2024-05-26 22:54:46+00:00): It's my first time doing any map geometry edits, so if I've messed anything up please let me know!
izen57 (2024-06-01 20:31:25+00:00): The thing is that the part of this building is in fact the courtyard paved with paving stones
bxl-forever (2024-06-02 07:39:55+00:00): I don’t blame you for the bad changeset, you know.  It has already been fixed and the courtyard you are referring to is now correctly mapped.
I understand it is a difficult case for you because this is one (rare) occurrence where we must strive to keep OSM data in sync with official UrbIS data for building outlines despite it looks like the real building is shorter; that explains why it requires some complicated piling up of building and building:part objects.
izen57 (2024-06-02 09:48:36+00:00): Alright, anyway thank for your diligent work.
kajwich (2025-01-11 13:11:34+00:00): Well, isn't this not the first node on OSM? I mean it is the node with number 1, which indeed is the smallest number available, but it is at version #39 (2025-01-11) and it's first version has been deleted a long time ago. Since then, the number 1 has been reassigned to a newly created node such as this radio tower.
JLZIMMERMANN (2024-07-09 15:39:38+00:00): Hello,
This halting_site is really for travellers in France named "gens du voyage". 
It has a specifique page here
https://www.islesurlasorgue.fr/au-quotidien/habitat-et-logement/gens-du-voyage/
JLZIMMERMANN (2024-07-09 15:40:27+00:00): The halting site of L'isle-sur-la Sorgue in the south of France https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240023823
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2024-07-09 16:38:25+00:00): Thank you for fixing my mistake
eggie (2024-05-27 05:52:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Het is niet goed mogelijk om busroutes aan te passen met editor iD. Dat kan alleen met editor JOSM.
Editor iD kan niet omgaan met routerelaties. Die gaan vervolgens stuk.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-05-27 05:55:21+00:00): Hier zijn verschillende routerelaties stuk
eggie (2024-05-27 06:03:10+00:00): Robin, Je bedoeling is vast goed. Ik stuur je wijzigingen een door naar een van de OV experts.
MVG
eggie
Leo Slager (2024-05-27 14:26:13+00:00): PB verzonden.
mueschel (2024-05-28 11:53:44+00:00): Hi,
could you explain what this area represents? Right now it doesn't have any valid tags.
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-27 02:06:06+00:00): Please do not delete features just to readd them with slightly different positions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151872950
Frans S (2024-09-26 14:10:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151873175
Jonah Adkins (2024-10-04 15:16:18+00:00): did you mean to add the bridge:support=pier tag to the susquehanna river relation??
quincylvania (2024-10-04 21:10:36+00:00): Yes, I've been adding isolated bridge piers as inner ways to river area multipolyons. Is this controversial? They're functionally permanent obstructions in the river, same as islands.
Jennings Anderson (2024-10-07 17:52:42+00:00): Makes sense — however, in this changeset, the `bridge:support=pier` tag was added to the entire _relation_ # 53084
quincylvania (2024-10-07 18:05:29+00:00): Oh I see now. That was clearly a mistake. Probably there were multiple piers in a multipolyon and I used the iD merge command on that mulitpolyon and the river area and the tag got added.
Jennings Anderson (2024-10-07 18:09:23+00:00): Figured as much :)
Tomas_J (2024-06-19 13:51:58+00:00): Hi, the name you used (Naturista nudist beach 12-12) is not correct.  This is not the official name of this beach.  Moreover you inserted this name multiples times to different objects around (a wood, a path, other beaches). Correct everything based on the rules of Openstreetmap which you can find on wiki. Thx.
Tomas_J (2024-06-21 10:02:45+00:00): Hallo, as you did not react to my previous comment under this changeset and you continue in the editing the area in a (in my opinion) not correct manner I send you the list of few of the mistaked I believe you did. Could you correct them pls.?
Examples:
The path name "Nudi Oplatil" does not exists in 'on-the-ground' reality 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469426844#map=17/50.10446/15.72134

The path name "Nudistická pláž Naturista Kempování" does not exists in 'on-the-ground' reality 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469426843#map=18/50.10468/15.72752
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469426834#map=18/50.09937/15.72320

The path name "Beach Colorful Swim Trunks" does not exists in 'on-the-ground' reality 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1284749650

The beach is named in English "Naturista nudist beach (12 of 12)" in name tag instead of the Czech language
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1286698220#map=17/50.10616/15.72817

The beach is cut into many pieces and numbered in the name tag (e. g. "7 of 12") instead of relation usage 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1282262617

The camping site does not exist on the ground (I did a survey) 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11899597948
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11899597947

The beach name "Plážové barevné plavky" does not exists in the 'on the ground' reality
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1282298707

The lake name "Písnik Oplatil (2 oF 2) does not match with it's wikidata name "Oplatil II"
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27778344

Suspissious names e. g. "Pratum - Meadow" in mixed English and Latin (?) without source 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49100557
...and many more in the area.
TrickyFoxy (2024-05-27 06:09:55+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151880204
Khidistavi (2024-05-27 14:44:08+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151900193
tastrax (2024-05-27 06:21:12+00:00): Hi Folks – Thanks for your edits. Unit/shop/suite numbers should be added to addr:unit key rather than combined with the addr:housenumber key. I have just updated a recent edit you made (Mega Meats). Cheers
Sampa7 (2024-05-27 03:48:27+00:00): Retificado para Rua Padre Antonio Luiz Marchioni.
Violaine_Do (2024-11-26 23:23:24+00:00): Hi, thks for your contrib, for next time please adjust imagery prior to mapping (and do not move buildings because they don't fit with img). Thks !
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151874172
MistiVolcano (2024-11-27 16:59:24+00:00): Thanks for letting me know, I will keep this in mind moving forward. Happy Mapping!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 04:57:47+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164840287
mikimapbuilder (2024-05-27 06:29:11+00:00): Road is connected to the network through service road, that is the reson for change of the connected road.
felipeeugenio (2024-05-27 12:35:42+00:00): Hula. Puede el tráfico normal pasar por este cruce?
Veo que eliminaste los tags que indicaban que así era.
saludos
felipeeugenio (2025-06-22 20:53:00+00:00): nunca hubo respuesta, por lo que restauro el cruce según wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Demergency_access).
troysalt (2024-06-10 01:50:52+00:00): Hello - I believe this is tagged improperly as a cycletrack. In the US, and the rest of SLC, cycletracks are protected or grade separated bike lanes. These are standard bike lanes with traffic calming near the intersections. I suggest these are mapped as standard bike lanes and map the traffic calming separately. Also much of 1100 E from 900 S through 1300 S is under construction so the bike lanes aren't complete. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway
Revnoplex (2024-05-27 08:54:49+00:00): what's your opinion on this map? https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=e8fa54687853433eb58e51584b36f681
Revnoplex (2024-05-27 08:57:39+00:00): *wrong link, this is better:https://vicroadsmaps.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=e8fa54687853433eb58e51584b36f681
Lachlan Baker (2024-05-27 11:59:00+00:00): Eh. I don’t see It has any different to the Calder Freeway dropping back to 100 or 80 for intersections on it.
Revnoplex (2024-05-28 07:12:39+00:00): But thats the other way round. But anyway, I had changed that section to match the current outcome of the classification dispute for the stretch of M1 between Nar Nar Goon and Longwarry North, as it was somewhat similar.
Lachlan Baker (2024-05-28 07:16:01+00:00): Yeah no worries. I don’t care enough to start a fight over it :)
NeisBot (2024-05-27 03:06:25+00:00): Hi MapMakerMaverick, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1286956347

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-27 06:24:16+00:00): Hi MapMakerMaverick, thanks for your tiny mapped beach. Looks good!

#HappyMapping
Khidistavi (2024-05-27 14:43:56+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151900193
nevw (2024-05-27 06:51:48+00:00): Hi, welcome to osm.
There are a few problems with the terrace you had added.
The building outlines on the property are expected to be traced instead of the shape of the land plot or building lot on which they sit.
The addr:housenumber has an ‘ accent added after the number.
The street name needs to have the ‘street’ part with an upper case S.
As the osm is essentially a database from which data is extracted to enable maps to be made or for navigation or other data evaluation, it is important that the correct and exact formatted data is entered into osm.
nevw (2024-05-27 21:13:30+00:00): Hi, I reverted this as it needs re-mapping onsite to fix.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-27 05:42:49+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151879088
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-27 05:43:01+00:00): Please do not add test data!!
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-09 17:16:22+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153753288
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-14 13:17:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1286959716/history has access:foot = no

Would using foot access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot ) be fitting at least equally well?

Usage statistics are sometimes wrong and should not be blindly followed, but are worth looking at - see http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/foot/&***/access%3Afoot/

would work well?

and the same for access:motor_vehicle
NeisBot (2024-05-27 04:24:24+00:00): Hi torresa, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 96% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 5 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-27 05:32:01+00:00): Should be checked by the local community, see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=151876658#16/-11.9563/-77.0691

Thanks!
woodpeck (2024-05-27 07:49:42+00:00): Also, when deleting large amounts of data, please provide an explanation in the changeset comment (you put "a").
mavl (2024-05-27 13:29:07+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, почему точный тег surface=asphalt заменён на неточный тег surface=paved?  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176276420/history
map per (2024-05-27 20:51:12+00:00): Hello brunonew,

are you sure the optometrist's office (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11936240569) you added in a forest really exists?

Thanks and best regards
map per
map per (2024-06-05 06:20:17+00:00): As you didn't answer I decided to delete the suspicious optometrist from the database.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2024-05-28 05:49:17+00:00): hello can you explain your edit? According to the press the name was changeds o i'm not understating why you inverted name and old_name. doesn't make much sense https://eco.sapo.pt/2024/02/05/sonae-entra-com-hotel-na-madeira-e-soma-unidade-turistica-no-algarve-em-2025/
Bolt033 (2024-05-28 05:56:55+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for bringing it into attention. Edits were based on the source as I found https://www.hoteisajuda.pt/ and could not find any current official source with the name you wrote. 
And kept old_name for users that search for it.
Do you have any tips for best practices?
Alexandra
BR_pebble (2024-07-18 12:19:48+00:00): Hello rakshe00
Thank you for mapping!
I have added missing building 19.8727419, 75.3343502;
19.8729538, 75.3344073;
19.8730203, 75.3343545;
19.8729685, 75.3344212;
19.8729989, 75.3344796;
19.8726085, 75.3344762;
19.8725496, 75.3344665;
19.8726166, 75.3345981;
19.873074, 75.33395;
19.8730956, 75.3338631;
19.8731115, 75.3338155;
19.8733168, 75.3338379;
19.8738779, 75.3341196;
19.8742178, 75.333953;
19.8740573, 75.3345185;
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
miluethi (2024-05-27 14:52:08+00:00): Shagun,
This is vandalism - please stop.
MxxCon (2024-05-31 02:16:10+00:00): Hello.
are these apartment buildings or hotels? Their websites are pretty confusing..🤔
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151877955
JozefM (2024-05-31 04:45:59+00:00): Appletree Suites is an apartment building;
Peachtree Suites is a hotel with furnished apartments for longer stays. Have tagged it accordingly.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=apartment
Szymson (2024-05-27 14:52:03+00:00): Ponownie, po co ten dubel pikietażu?
Szymson (2024-05-27 14:55:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11936236651
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11936236652
O jakie tabliczki dokładnie Ci chodzi w tagu fixme?
Szymson (2024-05-27 14:56:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1286973156
Tak nie tagujemy bramy, masz dobrze oznaczony punkt, reszta to ogrodzenie. Do poprawy.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-06-03 16:47:23+00:00): Những đoạn đường nào thực sự quá hẹp để xe oto có thể đi, bạn GrabVN_trampm đừng để tag = motorcar = destination. Vì chợ chỉ họp ở thời gian nào đó. Còn để motorcar=destination nghĩa là gần như cấm toàn thời gian luôn. Hãy để motorcar:conditional = no @ (06:00-10:00,16:00-19:00) nếu đây là thời gian họp chợ. Vậy thì ngoài khung giờ này xe hơi đi bình thường.
GrabVN_trampm (2024-06-05 10:58:04+00:00): Hi phoenixsaigon1698, Thank you for reaching out to me and sharing your suggestion. I have removed the destination tag. Happy Mapping!
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-06-05 11:12:15+00:00): Hi  GrabVN_trampm, Thank you for your reply and contribution to OSM Vietnam road data for transportation.
mavl (2024-06-22 11:38:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 153025651, 153025658, 153025634, 153025596, 153025615, 153025678 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources].
alessandrocarmeli (2025-06-14 14:54:07+00:00): not here!
FajrAl (2025-01-28 08:27:41+00:00): tidak boleh menambahkan data pribadi di OSM
mavl (2024-06-22 11:38:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 153025651, 153025658, 153025634, 153025596, 153025615, 153025678 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources].
tastrax (2024-05-28 06:00:35+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Глеб (2024-07-15 15:44:04+00:00): Улица не может иметь название "улица Цветочная". это неправильный порядок слов. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия
tastrax (2024-06-11 11:18:45+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
mavl (2024-06-22 11:38:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 153025651, 153025658, 153025634, 153025596, 153025615, 153025678 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources].
Frans S (2024-06-01 09:10:15+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
THIS IS A BUILDING ONLY Project.
Please focus on those objects.
By the way you map, you introduced a lot of issues which has to be solved.
Connected nodes to other features.
Highways (paths) not connected to a network of highways,  stream mapped as a path. etc.



Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151880734
大山かなめ (2024-05-27 06:35:10+00:00): 川角駅東側、橋梁付近に描かれていた歩道はbingと地理院標準地図を総合的に判断（踏切などで線路を越える設備がない、線路東側に柵のようなものがある）ため削除しました。もしも歩道が実在すると確認できる資料がある場合はお手数ですが修正してください。
silversurfer83 (2024-05-27 06:58:20+00:00): revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151882261
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151880993
eggie (2024-05-27 07:05:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Wanneer ergens een prive bruggetje ligt mag deze gewoon op de kaart. Uiteraard met de juiste accesstags.
Bv access=private
Liever geen zaken verwijderen uit OSM.
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community