piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rskedgell (2025-02-13 15:32:12+00:00): Using the longer version of the name in the brand tag seems quite reasonable to me, but without changing it in the Name Suggestion Index (NSI), it's quite likely to get changed back to just "Access" every time someone makes an edit with the web-based iD editor you're using. That and some other QA tools will suggest adding brand and other tags based on NSI.

If you need any help, please feel free to ask. I'm not one of NSI's maintainers, so I can't promise that it will get changed.
CurlingMan13 (2025-02-15 05:59:58+00:00): Why did you change the name of the realtor to "u" ?
Hypsometric (2025-02-15 20:31:35+00:00): That was an accident. I was probably mistyping a keyboard shortcut. Thanks for fixing it.
MatiMatix (2025-02-13 14:15:12+00:00): Link ze zdjęciem jak to teraz wygląda:
https://imgur.com/a/ZLhjFXt
kvjk (2025-03-23 08:31:30+00:00): Is the 112 road really completely closed for traffic?
On the link you provided it says it is possible to pass and same thing on promet.si and Google maps? Thank you for the info.
PierZen (2025-03-11 17:27:19+00:00): Quelle est votre source pour le classement de cette route. Tel que discuté dans le lien ci-dessous, on ne classifie pas pour le rendu

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/route-du-president-kennedy-saint-georges-to-maine-usa-trunk-road-or-not/117398/15
bxl-forever (2025-02-14 20:07:57+00:00): Hello,

Pardon my curiosity but it looks like "motor_vehicle=designated" was not used correctly.  As an access tag, it is basically a synonym for "motor_vehicle=yes".

OSM uses a cascaded access model, where "access" gets overriden with other tags.  If you set access=private but also allow every major category of users explicitely (foot, bicycle, horse, motor_vehicle), routers will grant access to… absolutely everyone.

This "deesignated" value only exists because in some countries (mostly the UK and Germany) there are very specific rules that some roads are only allowed if a street sign says so; but nothing of this kind exists in Belgian law, and we should never use it.

I bet you should remove this tag entirely.

Hope this helps.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-09 12:40:31+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1242471360/history has access:vehicle = private that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using vehicle access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:vehicle ) be fitting at least equally well?

Usage statistics are sometimes wrong and should not be blindly followed, but are worth looking at - see http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/vehicle/&***/access%3Avehicle/
codll (2025-03-09 12:49:16+00:00): Oh yep that's my bad I meant to use the "vehicle" tag
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-13 17:40:22+00:00): #seo #spam
TrickyFoxy (2025-02-13 21:25:02+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162481675
mueschel (2025-02-14 10:25:50+00:00): Hi,
bitte schau nochmal über die ganzen Wegweiser-Tags. Bei vielen stimmt die Reihenfolge im Key nicht, z.B. 

destination:forward:lanes 
-> destination:lanes:forward

destination:backward:lanes:colour
->
destination:colour:lanes:backward
felipeeugenio (2025-02-14 15:55:10+00:00): Hola. No usamos nombres genéricos como "acceso" o "entrada.
Fueron corregidos.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162469957
gscholz (2025-02-14 08:10:22+00:00): Hi Corraogiovanni,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=14.45424&lat=41.29215&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162470014

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you plese fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
bigopenmac (2025-10-04 10:20:16+00:00): Откуда эта инфорация по заправке Лукойл № 43 о времени работы?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/333622599

Mo-Su 00:00-21:40,22:00-24:00

На сайт другая информация https://lukoil.by/ru/ForMotorists/PetrolStation?type=gasStation&id=6004

ПН-ВС: 	00:10–23:40
kate_rocketdata (2025-10-06 07:43:19+00:00): Здравствуйте!
При обновлении ориентировались на сайт.
Спасибо за внимательность!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 01:50:28+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164657611
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-13 15:13:41+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429430616

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Bolt033 (2025-02-17 15:21:34+00:00): Hello,
Thank you for reporting the issue and I have corrected it, removing the street. At the time of editing I took the data of Rudna Mała 600
36-060 Głogów Młp. from here. https://www.klinika-rzeszow.pl/en/.

Have a great day.
user_22498080 (2025-02-13 15:13:14+00:00): valide
simomosgh (2025-02-13 15:14:17+00:00): correct
ilias_ (2025-02-13 23:16:10+00:00): Je rêve ou tu as créé 2 autres comptes pour auto-valider tes propres changements ?
simomosgh (2025-02-17 10:45:43+00:00): Vous ne vous trompez pas haha,
ilias_ (2025-02-17 10:48:47+00:00): J'apprécie l'honnêteté !
mcliquid (2025-02-13 15:35:52+00:00): Grüß dich! Ist das "Etappe 6" oder gehört die Nummer einfach zum Name? Für die Nummerierung von Etappen kann man auch "stage" verwenden.
Viele Grüße!
kapp (2025-02-14 07:47:47+00:00): Hallo mcliquid!
Ich versuche zurzeit verschiedene Teilstücke des Martinuswegs in meiner Region Allgäu-Oberschwaben zusammen zu führen.
Sie wurden von verschiedenen Usern und teilweise  unvollständig erfasst. Die Bezeichnungen der Etappen sind unterschiedlich und teilweise ohne Symbol erfasst.
Zum Zusammenführen halte ich mich an die url https://www.vianovis.net/martinusweg/ der Diözese Rottenburg. In der  Etappen Bezeichnung habe ich leider noch einen Fehler  es muss RWB und  nicht RWS heißen.
RWB steht für Regionalweg Bodensee-Allgäu-Oberschwaben.
Viele Grüße!
maro21 (2025-02-22 21:31:29+00:00): Tutaj można zawracać, nic nie stoi na przeszkodzie.
Henry572 (2025-02-14 21:41:41+00:00): Hallo mjr78,
Danke für die Ergänzung der einzelnen Gebäudeteile und Hausnummern! Ich habe noch den alten Umriss des gesamten Gebäudes 12a-d entfernt, da ja jetzt einzelne Umrisse erfasst sind.
Ist die Baustelle inklusive der Nr. 12 auch fertig? Dann könnte die Baustellenfläche (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1131166529) noch gelöscht werden.
Viele Grüße aus Düsseldorf,
Hendrik
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-18 21:28:56+00:00): this changeset removed the highway tag.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162471540
Carto'Cité (2025-03-05 08:44:15+00:00): Bonjour
Je remarque que tu as ajouté un grand nombre de POI en doublon. Globalement tous les éléments que tu as ajoutés autour du lac de Créteil étaient déjà existants et mieux décrits et placés ; désolé 😅. Je pense que tu ne voyais pas qu'ils existaient déjà sur le rendu de OsmGo! Je ne sais pas quoi te conseiller pour avoir un meilleur aperçu de ce qui est déjà présent. J'utilise généralement Vespucci sur Android car il me révèle tout.
Voici quelques exemples d'élément en doublon :

Ton ajout : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12585398713
Le POI : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8660168390

Ton ajout : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12585398710
Le POI existant : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8692098012

Ton ajout : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12585398708
Le POI existant : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6793944277

Ton ajout : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12585398711
Le POI existant : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8660168339

Voilà et je pense que c'est le cas de tous les POI autour du lac de ce que j'ai observé. Est-ce que tu es d'accord pour que je fasse un revert de ta contribution ? Tous les reprendre me semble un peu long pour arriver à la conclusion qu'ils étaient bien tous là et mieux décrits.

À ta disposition pour en discuter :)

Charles de Carto’Cité
watmildon (2026-03-01 20:10:41+00:00): Thanks for tidying up!
FroschForscher (2025-02-14 09:58:59+00:00): Hallo PaEi,
für mich sieht es so aus das ref und description Vertauscht sind. Vielleicht nochmal kurz drüber schauen.

FroschForscher
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162472080
PaEi (2025-02-14 19:19:36+00:00): Hallo FroschForscher,

wurde korrigiert, danke für's bescheid geben.

PaEi
Ekeefoof (2025-02-13 16:09:40+00:00): Da review_requested=yes: Stellplätze (amenity=parking_space) sollten sich immer innerhalb eines Parkplatzes (amenity=parking) befinden, alleine machen sie wenig Sinn, siehe Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Street_Side_Parking.png

Sonst sieht dieses und die anderen Changesets sehr gut aus.
JJIglesias (2025-02-13 17:57:06+00:00): Por Favor, DEJA DE CAMBIAR la clasificacion de las vias existentes. Esa clasificacion fue hecha por otros maperos con amplia experiencia y bajo criterios muy especificos. Aun no tienes ni la experiencia ni el conocimiento para cambiar la data de ese tipo existente, y si fuera el caso deberias consultarlo con mappers mas avanzados y experimentados.

Ya varias de tus ediciones han producido errores significativos al mapa que otros hemos tenido que corregir, y tu ni siquiera contestas a los mensajes que se te han enviado.

Seria muy triste tener que REVERTIR (Borrar) las ediciones que hagas por afectar negativamente al mapa. Eres bienvenido a contribuir POSITIVAMENTE AL MAPA que mucho falta por AGREGAR mas que por cambiar.

Por favor revisa en detalle tus ediciones antes de subirlas,

Gracias
ralley (2025-02-14 03:18:17+00:00): Please use descriptive changeset comments - you have been asked multiple times to do this and you continue to create changesets with either very brief or non existent comments.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Also this changeset abbreviated a lot of bus stop names, please don't do this, the standard in OSM is to avoid abbreviations and contractions.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations

Please take the time to read the feedback that is being left on your changesets and reply.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162472526
eggie (2025-02-13 19:25:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
watmildon (2025-02-19 05:02:34+00:00): Apparently, according to their website, the mascot is "Rockies & Pilgrims". What in the world are we supposed to do with that??

https://gopilgrimsgorockies.com/
Yog Sot (2025-02-13 21:46:57+00:00): ale on został rozebrany razem z podkładami?
Yog Sot (2025-02-15 23:46:32+00:00): zapytałem, bo pytanie co jest teraz, a jak zostały pozostałości to ustawia się tagi np razed. Często się mylisz, dlatego wrzuć jakiec potwierdzenie, np zdjęcie.
Programista Kolejowy (2025-02-17 08:32:15+00:00): Rozebrano rozjazd kolejowy oraz ten tor zakończony kozłem oporowym. I z tego co mi wiadomo (a jestem miłośnikiem kolei z Krotka więc interesują mnie losy dworca) to nie planują go odbudowywać. Tylko łącznik 816 będzie naprawiony
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-13 17:32:36+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3243833964
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380330113

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Adam_Piszczek (2025-02-13 19:25:38+00:00): Poprawione
Dimitar155 (2025-02-14 21:43:38+00:00): Улицата е била сегментирана заради наличието на различни тротоарни настилки в различните ѝ сегменти. Не ми е ясно защо е нужно да се окрупи и данните за тротоарите да се изтрият.
Cat2006 (2025-02-19 19:28:52+00:00): Иначе не излизаше в OsmAnd
Dimitar155 (2025-02-21 12:47:59+00:00): Това е бъг в OsmAnd, не е проблем на данните тук.

Достатъчно е да се изтрият "данните на живо" (Live updates -> Bulgaria -> Update size -> Delete) и после да се свалят наново (от същото меню се избира "Update now").

Ако не стане, може да се изтрие цялата карта на България (в OsmAnd) и да се свали наново.
MihaelIvanjek (2025-02-13 17:14:56+00:00): Reverting due to accidental node creation #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162474631
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-13 17:32:44+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11132417027

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-02-13 19:28:59+00:00): Hoi Nordin

one feature one element

Dus kiezen voor playground of voor pedestrian en dan wel met area=yes

MVG
eggie
b-jazz (2025-02-14 18:03:59+00:00): Hey Steve, hate to report this on Valentine's Day of all days, but your deletion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1034890320 broke the relation that it was a member of. It was happily coupled with the green, but when you deleted the fairway, you left the green single and lonely. I see that you created another green in its place but failed to introduce (merge) it with the existing green.

Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon to understand the concept and give instructions on how to create them in your editor. You should also check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls for some common errors in mapping golf courses.

Thanks.
SteveSw (2025-02-15 00:19:48+00:00): Thank you for pointing out my error. I changed the fairways so that they are no longer surrounding the green, and removed the inner relationship on the two greens. If this causes a problem with anything you are working on, let me know and I can recreate the fairway and green as it was before.
b-jazz (2025-02-15 03:36:05+00:00): Thanks Steve. There's nothing inherently wrong with fairway going around the green. You just have to make sure the lines don't intersect/touch and that you combine them into a multipolygon. For instance, if you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1352433807, you can see it has great imagery and the fairway grass can be seen going all the way around the green. In that case, draw the fairway all the way around, select both (shift click them) and then type 'C' to "Merge" them together into a multipolygon.
Piotr Strębski (2025-02-13 17:28:47+00:00): *łąka, trawniki, chodniki, korekty geo :-)
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-13 17:32:40+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908872053
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908872077
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908873094

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-08-04 22:12:35+00:00): poprawione
sykul (2025-02-13 17:54:37+00:00): Hi. Thanks for the contributions. A couple of things. It looks like 'Alebrijes' is the name and 'Latin plant-based food' is the tagline. Arguably you could keep 'Latin plant-based food' in the name because it's on the sign, but I can't see any trace of 'Frankfurt' being in the name.

Secondly, the only reason I'm butting in on your changeset is that the bounding box covered half of France. Please try to separate changes into individual cities in the future. Thanks.
Udarian (2025-02-13 20:59:00+00:00): As I have already told you these aren’t service roads as their role in the network is that of a residential road, they are certainly to side to be a service road. Second of all, on TIGRER and other official Miami dade county sources these roads have the names you removed to please stop removing the name and tagging them as service. Second theses aren’t private as there aren’t sufficient gates to be considered as such (a road is only access=private between two gates, only one of these roads has A gate, not two), Brooker Street is certainly not private as it is seemingly for through traffic within the network.
Again I ask you to please stop making these incorrect edits as I previously explained.
rscmanager (2025-02-13 21:33:21+00:00): The access = private tag is indicating that the object is not to be used by the public. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate
Service roads here are private restricted through signage. As I provided in the notes, St. Alban's Day Nursery has a private access easement to access 3465 Brooker Street. "Brooker Street" is so named between Thomas Avenue and Charles Terrace even though road is privately owned. Other road names are erroneous and don't appear in any public records, or if so appear due to mapping error. See City of Miami municipal road atlas at pg. 47M showing no road names. Miami-Dade County does not control the road network in this section. I welcome your feedback; however, kindly follow OpenStreetMap good practices re: verifiability and respect for edits of other users. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Do_correct_errors
rscmanager (2025-02-13 23:38:42+00:00): Follow up: Based your feedback, I've double checked Miami-Dade County Open GIS (although MDC is not the authority with jurisdiction for this section of the road network). These roads are not named and in fact do not appear in MDC's dataset. See here: https://gisweb.miamidade.gov/landinformation/. The roads are in fact private. See folio 01-4120-004-0260 on MDC Property Appraiser's database here:  https://www.miamidade.gov/Apps/PA/PropertySearch/#/
rscmanager (2025-02-15 01:19:00+00:00): Responding to your comments.

You stated: "TIGER is from the census bureau, they are as official as it comes." The official record of public rights of way in this section of the road network is the City of Miami Municipal Road Atlas which is maintained by the City's Department of Public Works. 444 SW 2nd Ave, 4th Floor. As an alternative, see here: 
https://miamigis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=b0971e8c87dd4544b5d6fdc180d0a7dd

You stated: "The roads here are way to wide to be service roads." Service roads you identified nearby are the same width. 

You stated: "They are not private as these aren’t driveways or part of a gated community." This is inconsistent with OpenStreetMaps definition. The access = private tag is indicating that the object is not to be used by the public. Further, the Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser's Office shows the roads contained within privately-owned parcels of land and identifies the owner of record. 

You stated: "As for the 'St. Alban's Day Nursery' it is clear that the parking on the side of the road is private from the bing streetside and the property apaisers office but that doesn not aplly to the road in general, drivers backing out of the parking may have priority but that doesn't make it private." I previously provided reference to the private access easement granting this particular business the right to access the private road ("Brooker Street"). The easement can be located online via the website for the Miami-Dade County Recorders' Office.   

You stated: "it can be used by cars passsing through an thus isn't private." There are Private Road No-Thru Traffic signs posted throughout the property. A gate restricts access across across one section. The roads service tenant parking and garbage containers for an apartment complex. Use by cars passing through though possible would be illegal trespassing.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-02-14 01:13:56+00:00): Hello & welcome to OSM! Thanks for your work, but one thing to mention. Please make sure that you leave a proper Changeset Comment, so that other mappers know what you've done: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments. Thanks!
fortera_au (2025-02-14 03:11:23+00:00): Hey there, sometimes the Microsoft Building Footprints dataset isn't all that accurate, it's a good idea once you've added some buildings with it to make sure it matches up to aerial imagery, as some of these aren't quite aligned properly.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162475212
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 01:50:29+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164657611
emtiwi (2025-05-16 12:55:49+00:00): Mam pytanie czemu usunięto budynek dworca? Tam znajduje się poczekalnia i toalety.
eggie (2025-02-13 19:29:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Fizzie-DWG (2025-02-21 03:11:42+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17291
qugeb (2025-02-14 16:40:44+00:00): Hallo,

zu diesem Changeset sind Fragen aufgekommen. Könntest du mal bitte hier vorbeischauen? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4626992
fahrimwald (2025-02-14 18:53:21+00:00): In Bezug auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4552926
und https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4626992:

Ich habe auch mal im Ratsinformationssystem Eggolsheim geblättert:
(https://ris.komuna.net/eggolsheim/Agendaitem.mvc/Search)

1. https://ris.komuna.net/eggolsheim/Meeting.mvc/Download/87408538-91454108

Punkt 7:

"Sachverhalt:
Südlich des Kreisverkehrs in Neuses sollen auf Höhe des Kreisbauhofes die Zufahrten für
verschiedene Betriebsgelände (Fa. Dormann, Fa. Amazon, etc.) neu und verkehrssicher geregelt
werden.
Der Firma Dormann (Kieswerk) wurde bereits eine Zufahrt (Linksabbieger) zum neuen
Abbaugebiet östlich der St2244 genehmigt. Eine Vereinbarung über eine Kostenbeteiligung der
Marktgemeinde besteht ebenfalls. Da die Firma Dormann das Abbaugebiet kurzfristig
erschließen möchte, besteht hier ein dringender Handlungsbedarf."

Weiter unten ist zur Orientierung ein Bild des Kreisverkehrs.

2. https://ris.komuna.net/eggolsheim/Document.mvc/Download/75

"13. Abschluss einer Vereinbarung zwischen der Firma Dormann und dem Markt Eggolsheim
bezüglich der straßenbaulichen Erschließung des genehmigten Abbaugebietes östlich der
Staatsstraße 2244

Der Marktgemeinderat hat sich bereits im Jahr 2012 mit dem Antrag der Firma Dormann zur
Errichtung einer ordnungsgemäßen Zufahrt zum genehmigten neuen Abbaugebiet östlich der
Staatsstraße 2244 befasst. 
[...]

14. Abschluss einer Vereinbarung mit dem Staatlichen Bauamt Bamberg bezüglich der
straßenbaulichen Erschließung des Abbaugebietes der Firma Dormann östlich der
Staatsstraße 2244

[...]"
gpstracks (2025-02-15 08:01:12+00:00): Buongiorno
La nuova posizione del punto mi pare non corrisponda per quota e per conformazione alla sella in questione. Risulta in contrasto anche con quanto indicato sulls CTR. E' possibile conoscere la fonte dei dati?
Grazie
Edelsalami (2025-02-14 08:28:21+00:00): Hallo Nordgork, ich habe deine Änderungen rückgängig gemacht. Die Hausnummern waren vor deiner Bearbeitung korrekt nach Kataster eingetragen. Bitte wähle in Zukunft auch passende Beschreibungen zu deinen Changesets und nicht immer wieder dieselben. Danke. Gruß
Edelsalami (2025-02-14 08:26:05+00:00): Hallo Nordgork, ich habe deine Änderungen rückgängig gemacht. Bitte informiere dich wofür das Tag historuic=ruins verwendet wird. Tipp: Damit werden keine verfallenden Gebäude markiert. Gruß
Fizzie-DWG (2025-02-21 03:25:50+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17292
domiden (2025-02-13 18:45:48+00:00): Should be: “… ("Kassel-Vorderer Westen").”
domiden (2025-02-13 19:23:42+00:00): Sorry, it should be “… ("Kassel-Wehlheiden").”
Glassman (2025-02-13 20:40:10+00:00): Did you use the county's boundary data for the city's boundary?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162476809