piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
joost schouppe (2024-10-15 07:16:34+00:00): Hoi Robin,
Kijk je deze eens na?
Opgemerkt via Element: https://matrix.to/#/!SqvNXrBsvdGHYRyota:matrix.org/$172893584643810qNNTK:matrix.org?via=matrix.org&via=matrix.domainepublic.net&via=kde.org
joost schouppe (2024-10-15 07:17:52+00:00): Voor de duidelijkheid: er zijn drie onterecht nieuwe punten midden van de weg hier in de buurt
teambuildingonwheels (2024-10-16 11:05:12+00:00): Dag joost, ik kijk alles nog eens na. Normaal gezien doe ik dit na elke teambuilding, maar deze in Gent was ik vergeten. Ik zet alles juist van deze teambuilding zo snel mogelijk
eggie (2024-09-05 15:25:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-06 22:30:21+00:00): Please don't add duplicate roads that are also not motorway
eggie (2024-09-05 15:12:50+00:00): Je hebt hier bijna alle adresinfo verwijderd. Graag intact laten.
Gr eggie
eggie (2024-09-05 15:13:51+00:00): Adresnode hersteld
eggie (2024-09-05 15:21:26+00:00): Marcel  dat geval zou het aangepast kunnen worden naar schoolterrein.
amenity=school
In mei van dit jaar waren dit nog gewoon velden?
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.03932,5.097249,18/?datastrip=20240528_PNEO-03
Hoe snel is die school dan gebouwd?.. en welke?

MVG
eggie
Marcel vd Velden (2024-09-06 10:23:03+00:00): Klopt, tot aan de zomerstop is daar nog gehockeyd. Direct daarna het is het veld bij de oude hockey kantine bouwijp gemaakt en is er een (nood) school neergezet.
Zie https://www.thofvanrhijnhuysen.nl/we-komen-eraan!/
Marcel vd Velden (2024-09-06 10:24:21+00:00): Overigens is er ook een weg van de oude hockey kantine langs de rand (richting zuid-zuid-west) naar "rond het fort" aangelegd. 
Ik wacht wel op een nieuwe foto voor dat ik dat in ga tekenen.
eggie (2024-09-06 10:28:52+00:00): Yepp.. oke.  Helaas zijn de laatste sat foto' s van satellietdataportaal allemaal bewolkt.
Wellicht over een paar weken een goede.
Wanneer tijdelijke gebouwen in de BAG staan dan kun je ze via het osm forum laten importeren middels een verzoek in het draadje BAG importverzoeken.
vorpalblade (2024-09-09 17:50:02+00:00): It looks like this and 156219687 are from an import.

Can you please document it on the wiki? Specifically on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue .

If you didn't go through the import process (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ), please do so ASAP. Otherwise, it is _highly_ likely that this data will be removed.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-09-13 18:04:04+00:00): I send PM pointing to this changeset comment.

I plan on reverting this edit due to unclear license and apparently lack of consultations with local community.
Kri_ttt (2024-09-13 18:29:58+00:00): Hello

Firstly, I want to apologize for not giving more information and details about this dataset, and not consulted with the local community first. As I did not aware of such process and procedure before.
I obtained the dataset from Thai Open Government Data website (https://data.go.th/en/dataset/gdpublish-cfd-point)
As it is a public data and publicly available under an open data common license, from the Royal Forest Department of Thailand (กรมป่าไม้)

The data set contain coordinates, name with some addresses of community woods/forests around Thailand.
I did imported only the name with coordinates, and with additional tags: managed=yes, natural=wood and source=กรมป่าไม้ (the Royal Forest Department) as nodes.

I realized now that I did not undergo the process of importing dataset. I do understand if it needs to be reverted. If so, please also reverted changeset 156219687 too, as it contains some of the dataset.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-09 15:40:16+00:00): "open data common license" - which are exact conditions of this license?

I made a relatively quick check and failed to find it.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-08 11:27:19+00:00): Please, can you give details of the license? Where one may find legal text of the license?
StarTrek2 (2024-11-13 03:25:55+00:00): The license for data.go.th is this one
https://data.go.th/pages/dga-open-government-license

The license has been discussed before. It seems not really compatible with OSM.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/documentation-of-gistda-import/90597
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/looking-for-more-sources-on-official-boundaries/108846
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-05 09:57:54+00:00): @Kri_ttt

please reply to questions about this import

after 6 months you failed to provide info on which license this data is which is mandatory to do BEFORE import
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-05 11:15:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 163240264, 163240244 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import from incompatible source, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156219627 - DWG Ticket #2025030510000251
dadavid (2024-09-06 15:31:53+00:00): Hi Lorenzcarlkiefer, 

willkommen bei OSM :) 

Du hast hier aus einem highway=service einen highway=unclassified gemacht. highway=unclassified ist eine etwas verwirrende Klassifizierung, schau gerne mal ins Wiki, was das eigentlich bedeuten soll [2]. Ich finde, hier passt highway=residential besser, wie siehst du das? :) 

Liebe Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen

David

[1] https://osm.org/way/974517541

[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=unclassified

[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dresidential
dadavid (2025-05-04 02:11:52+00:00): angepasst
MKnight (2024-09-05 09:54:43+00:00): Moin, das Löschen der Relationen passt nicht so recht mit dem CS-Kommentar zusammen, warum hast Du die gelöscht?
biker@gf (2024-09-05 10:03:35+00:00): Weil diese Relationen (Skater Routen) nur ein Planungsstand waren und nicht umgesetzt wurden. Sie sind nicht ausgeschildert.
MKnight (2024-09-05 11:34:45+00:00): Ok, danke.
eggie (2024-09-05 15:18:19+00:00): Clubhuis toegevoegd. Je ziet anders niets.
gr eggie
Pieter Vander Vennet (2024-12-19 17:00:17+00:00): Dit is tweemaal toegevoegd. Passen jullie dit aan aub?
mavl (2024-09-05 13:16:10+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, зачем на каждом углу здания тег addr:place?  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/836077804  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/836077785  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/836077108  
и все остальные.
dingoy29 (2024-09-05 17:47:31+00:00): Добрый день! Исправила
eggie (2024-09-05 15:15:37+00:00): Marcel,  Ook geen adres meer?

Adresnode hersteld
Marcel vd Velden (2024-09-06 10:20:02+00:00): Oeps, niet goed gegaan, dank voor het herstel.
PS. Locatie wordt binnenkort verwijderd en nieuw gebouwd.
eggie (2024-09-06 10:23:34+00:00): Yep.. de wereld verandert voortdurend 😀

Mapse
K0wWypRQG (2024-09-25 21:26:20+00:00): Aber momentan kann man da noch mit dem Auto durch, oder? (de facto)
rohieb (2024-09-25 21:55:59+00:00): naja, den Nordanger ja de facto auch, und der ist als Radweg eingetragen. Hab letztes mal nicht drauf geachtet, ob da irgendwelche Schilder stehen, muss ich nächstes Mal dran denken…
rohieb (2024-09-28 16:23:27+00:00): War eben nochmal vor Ort; die Straße ist definitiv für zweispurige Fahrzeuge geeignet und im Moment auch so genutzt, auch wenn in der Widmung als Fuß/Radweg ausgewiesen. Im Moment stehen noch keine Schilder bzgl. access. Ich ändere es erstmal wieder in highway=service mit einer entsprechenden Notiz dran, bis die Lage sich in der Zukunft ändert.
canfe (2024-10-08 07:53:49+00:00): Anche qui vale lo stesso discorso per ruins
PS: oltre a modificare sarebbe corretto rispondere, anche brevemente ai commenti sui changeset che gli altri utenti ti fanno
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156221272
GiaMar (2024-10-08 12:23:00+00:00): Se si tratta di correzioni di modesta entità forse non è il caso di aprire una discussione, l'importante è che la correzione sia stata fatta. In caso di argomentazioni più ampie, le ho inserite.
cloventt (2024-09-11 23:13:21+00:00): FYI this deleted a number of new buildings I had manually added from physically visiting location, for example the Quest on Kilmore hotel
Numbergod (2024-09-12 01:49:17+00:00): Fuck!  Really sorry mate.  I hope you can repair my damage.

Genuine question.  I'm guessing the buildings are missing from the LINZ imagery I'm using?

Is there a way of easily telling what's been genuinely demolished, vs added manually by someone surveying?  I just made the assumption that if the building wasn't in the picture, it'd probably been cleared post quakes.

I realise I have a lot to learn, but genuinely hadn't considered that scenario, even though on reflection, I've added my own survey data.

I'm seeing a lot of empty sections in suburbia with buildings on sections that have been cleared in the photography, which I've taken to mean have been demo'd, and will eventually get added when the images get updated?

Recently, I've been concentrating on adding the tens of thousands of missing buildings from the LINZ data, just to try to improve the average coverage.

From memory, there's no creation date on the buildings I have checked.  Or was it just bad luck on the ones I had checked?  If I'm missing something, please let me know.  I definitely don't want to be recklessly breaking others peoples work

Sorry about the damage, I realise I'm still learning, and are keen to receive help/advice to stop me breaking more than I (think) I'm fixing.
cloventt (2024-09-12 02:30:47+00:00): Nah no worries mate I added them back. 

Yes, the LINZ datasets are a year or so out of date. 

A lot of buildings have gone up in the meantime and I've been manually adding them where I can. Rather than wait for aerial imagery to be updated, I look for any site plans submitted for council consent so I can get accurate building footprints. This means in some cases the buildings are on the map before the LINZ imagery shows that they're there.

If the aerial imagery shows an empty lot, but a building is present in the map data, I would check the changeset history for the object to see when it was last updated. If the building was added very recently then I leave it alone, but if the building was added to the map a long time ago then it has probably been recently demolished, and can be removed. I think that is the best way to check.

Generally speaking we're past an inflection point in the city rebuild. That is to say, most of the demolition has already happened some time ago, and there are relatively few recent demolitions. However there are lot of new builds going up right now, so it is always good to double check before deleting something.

The LINZ building outline data (https://data.linz.govt.nz/layer/101290-nz-building-outlines/) is pretty good, but it is built from computer-vision processing of the latest aerial imagery, which means it is just as out-of-date as the most recent aerial imagery (currently that is Nov 2023). This is why it can be risky to just bulk import data from other sources, even LINZ. I learned this the hard way when I did a bulk import of bus stops a few years ago from the Metro API and clobbered a bunch of work others had done on them by hand.

In general, its best to rely on multiple sources rather than just aerial imagery or LINZ data alone.

Happy mapping!
Numbergod (2024-09-12 02:54:45+00:00): Thanks for that.  Yes.  I shall be more careful in future.  I've been working to try and improve the overall average of the data, trying to do manually supervised mass updates.

Where I can contribute the most with my existing OSM skill level.

I can't believe how many houses are missing, and the massive infill in houses in some really dodgy areas that would never have been allowed under previous rules.

I've spotted at least one future cancer cluster in the making!

As you point out, the time lag in the data is pretty much the issue.

I figured it was machine generated.  It's pretty obvious to my eye.  It Looooooves the straight lines and 90 degree corners.  Container yards get it all excited!

I too have a background in software, radios and paramedicine.

I also have a perfect record in CPR.

They ALL died.
cloventt (2024-09-12 03:25:05+00:00): I have been manually adding houses by drawing them by hand using JOSM. It is a big job.

FYI I just used osm-revert to do a partial revert of this changeset, adding back the development at Gloucester Green and Madras Square. I manually recreated the deleted developments near the town hall and Manchester Square.
Numbergod (2024-09-12 03:39:37+00:00): All cool.  I was originally drawing them by hand too, and quite proud of my results.  

Then I found the LINZ data layer, so have been using that.  It's not perfect, but it's better than what's there.

I'd recommend you probably stop doing it like that.  I think the LINZ stuff is probably good enough, and comes with their building ID, so could potentially be matched and updated as they perfect their system.

I'm working on trying to get the same coverage as other suburbs, and doing a tidyup of everything afterwards.

"Perfect is the enemy of good"

I've found I can manually verify and add several thousand buildings a night.

Thinking about the data, I'm not even sure how much of it is actually useful.  Does anyone actually care if a building is a house or a garage?  Perhaps a little.  But in reality, most likely not.

I think your AEDs are probably an example of the good quality data, even though the out of hospital cardiac arrest survival rates are < 10%, and their value is very questionable.  Any idea where the various apps are pulling their data from?

I found a lost of postboxes that I might add later, but they're probably of even more questionable value.
gendy54 (2024-12-20 21:50:07+00:00): Bonjour,

Attention à modifier les tags associés school:FR:élémentaire => primaire
Sinon les données deviennent fausses et incohérentes
waldyrious (2025-01-09 22:52:22+00:00): Hey Martinus123! In this changeset you added "species = hippocastanum" to this tree, but the genus remained as "Quercus". "Quercus hippocastanum" is not a valid binomial designation. Can you please confirm which should be the right species name for this tree?
map per (2024-09-08 17:07:08+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-05 10:01:04+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1313451675

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bartekkpee (2024-09-05 10:28:44+00:00): Dzięki za komentarz :) Poprawiłem adres
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 03:42:11+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164839497
limes11 (2024-09-22 10:26:00+00:00): Hi

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1310915137

war vor 4 Wochen von beiden Seiten gesperrt. 

Sind die Absperrungen tatsächlich weg ?

Viele Grüße
BER319 (2024-09-22 17:36:33+00:00): Guten Abend,

leider habe ich keine Bilder gemacht. Die Absperrung des Hauptweges kommt auf beiden Seiten so wie eingetragen kurz nach dem Trampelpfad. Somit ist der Trampelpfad frei zugänglich. Soweit wie ich mich erinnern kann.

VG
BER319
limes11 (2024-09-22 20:18:21+00:00): Hi, 

am östlichen Teil ist die Absperrung viel weiter nördlich, etwa an diesem Knoten 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1422334322

Der Feldweg südlich davon ist bereits abgesperrt. Am westlichen Ende hat sich der Trampelpfad kurz vor der Absperrung gebildet, die natürlich die Nutzung des Gebiets dahinter verhindern soll. Das ist ähnlich wie bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1310915134, auch da zweigt der Trampelpfad kurz vor der Barriere ab. 

Ich würde das access=no wieder ergänzen, da Ziel der Vor-Ort-Beschilderung ist, hier keine Verbindung zu erlauben. 

Viele Grüße
BER319 (2024-09-22 20:37:31+00:00): Schade das es keine Bilder gibt. Dann setze access=no bitte wieder. Ohne Bilder kann ich leider nicht das Gegenteil beweisen.
5m4u9 (2024-09-06 05:59:53+00:00): hola, tienes un error en este cambio:

los terrenos (todo el contorno del terreno) no puede ser un edificio de casa. Cada edificio en cada terreno debe ser añadido al mapa por separado.
eggie (2024-09-05 16:00:35+00:00): Dag Jules.. De info heb ik gekopieerd naar de adresnode.
MVG
eggie
fs_LT (2024-09-05 10:12:07+00:00): war ein falscher Kommentar von mir; CS wurde reverted
noelbov (2024-09-06 14:49:47+00:00): Hallo LewisD95,
Jouw uitleg i.v.m. de wijziging die je gisteren aanbracht is niet erg verhelderend. Wat heb je precies gewijzigd en waarom want nu bevat de fietsroute 11-33 sinds gisteren 'unused segments' terwijl die voorheen in orde was.
Zie onderaan webpagina https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/route/8634817
Kan je dat terug corrigeren?
Bedankt.
LewisD95 (2024-09-09 09:34:45+00:00): Hoi noelbov,
De wijziging was om de oversteekplaatsen voor de fietsers correct aan te geven (gescheiden fiets- en voetpad), maar ik zie dat u deze al aangepast hebt. Bedankt
redd (2025-11-07 16:42:41+00:00): Hi Urml,
danke für deine Ergänzungen zu OpenStreetMap. 

Hier wurde service:vehicle:car_repair=yes hinzugefügt, was bei einer Autowerkstatt von shop=car_repair eigentlich schon impliziert angenommen werden kann. 

Meintest du aufgrund deines Änderungskommentars mit Autoteilen stattdessen vielleicht car_parts, also service:vehicle:car_parts=yes? 

grüße,
redd
Urml (2025-11-09 20:28:34+00:00): Hi Redd,
ich verstehe nicht mehr ganz wer was geändert hat.  Was du geschrieben hast, mit service:vehicle:car_parts=yes klingt für mich plausibel und passend. 
Ändere es gerne so wie du denkst das es passt.
Grüße,
Urml
redd (2025-11-10 09:53:32+00:00): Hi Urml,
ok ich ergänze nun das service:vehicle:car_parts=yes.

PS: Falls du Desktop Firefox nutzt, empfehle ich das Userscript, mit dem werden die Änderung in Changesets farblich hervorgehoben:  https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Better-osm-org

Grüße,

redd
os-emmer (2024-09-06 18:01:23+00:00): Hi jacorsi,
I saw that you added one or several stations of the Protezione Civile. Thanks for that. I think you made a little mistake. You added the emergency=disaster_response to these 4 buildings:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188805638
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1313455079
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188805640
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188805630
That would mean that there are 4 seperate stations next to each other. Is that realy the case? Or are these buildings belonging to one station? the name and emergency=disaster_response should only be added exactly on once for every station. For more details see the wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:One_feature,_one_OSM_element
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-09-05 10:52:33+00:00): Hello CjMalone,
was this mass edit discussed beforehand?
Best regards
Roger Wilco
user_21425661 (2024-09-05 11:06:17+00:00): Mass edits don't need to be discussed, automated ones do. This wasn't automated.

It was manual, using regular OSM editing tools, using sources (first party website) that have been established within OSM and OKed by the LWG.

I have a long record of doing edits like this, without objection. More than 3 weeks ago I tried to bring it up with the DE community, but nobody was interested/objected.
JeroenHoek (2024-09-05 11:24:56+00:00): Single country, single topic, clear changeset even at a glance. This seems totally fine. The bounding box juts into the Netherlands too (which is why I noticed it), but this changeset is easy to understand and dismiss.
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-09-05 11:30:45+00:00): Hey, thanks for your quick reply. :)

Such changes should be discussed beforehand. You have not checked the objects yourself on site. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits#Standard_editors

The best way to reach the German community is via the Community Forum. I will ask there.

I also doubt whether the website used is an authorised source.
user_21425661 (2024-09-05 11:32:59+00:00): Thank you
rene78 (2024-09-05 11:45:30+00:00): Had a quick look at the changeset. The URL's have been updated. Looks legit to me. Don't know how to check a website 'on-site' anyway.
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-09-05 11:49:43+00:00): I have created a topic here:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/massenedit-poi-websites/118365

Did it in German. I hope this is okay.
eggie (2024-09-05 15:32:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Waarschijnlijk staat er een C12 bord?
Dan dus way 	motor_vehicle=no & moped=yes & mofa=yes & traffic_sign=NL:C12

Nu routeert het niet meer voor moped en mofa. 
brom en snorfiets zijn in OSM motorvoertuigen. 
Kijk je nog even.
Dat zal ook voor je volgende changesets gelden.

De wiki hoe bebording te taggen. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden&direction=next&oldid=984258#C:_Geslotenverklaring
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-05 10:30:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8403292933
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1313451675

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
onovy (2024-09-16 13:09:28+00:00): Ahoj,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12157435293

transformator na sloupu el. vedeni se znaci jako
power=pole
transformer=distribution

viz. dokumentace:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Elektrick%C3%A1_veden%C3%AD

Diky.
Arktorus (2025-04-25 22:58:06+00:00): Aha. Dobrá děkuji za vysvětlení. Příště to budu vědět. Děkuji za opravu a radu. Měj se! :D
Dawid2849 (2024-09-05 13:09:03+00:00): dzięki!
martinst (2025-04-28 15:20:22+00:00): surface=compacted  passt nur mit tracktype=grade2 zusammen.
Bitte tracktype anpassen.
eggie (2024-09-05 15:51:19+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk Hier heb je alleen iets verschoven aan de landuse
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=156224464

MVG
eggie
AvNVRZL (2024-09-17 14:34:26+00:00): hi Eggie, 

Het verschuiven van landuse was per ongeluk en niet mijn bedoeling. Heb hier geprobeerd 't Schoor dicht te zetten in verband met een c12 bord. Dank voor het meekijken! Hopelijk leer ik gaande weg ;)
eggie (2024-09-17 14:42:42+00:00): Oke... dan op het wegdeel
motor_vehicle=no
.. moped=yes
.. mofa=yes
.. traffic_sign=NL:C12
Evt uitzonderingen
Groet..
eggie
BCNorwich (2025-06-03 06:26:55+00:00): Hi, The roads don't go over the buildings, (it's dangerous). Please zoom in and make corrections. You can use the square up tool on the buildings. 

Regards Bernard.
eggie (2024-09-05 15:45:14+00:00): Dag Av  Welke bebording staat hier.
C12?
Hoe zit het met moped en mofa?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-05 15:35:13+00:00): Zie feedback 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden&direction=next&oldid=984258#C:_Geslotenverklaring

Hoe kom je bij die parkeerplaats?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-05 15:41:41+00:00): Tot de parkeerplaats heb ik weer opengezet.
MVG
eggie
aTarom (2024-09-06 16:05:34+00:00): Hola, hay que procurar editar en vez de eliminar y volver a crear, por ejemplo en esta edición
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543176008/history
eliminada por esta otra
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1313461781/history
, en la que se ha perdido el name:ca y el historial, debemos evitar este tipo de ediciones por respeto a los anteriores editores que han editado durante los 7 años del elemento. Cualquier duda me dices. Feliz mapeo!
Saludos.
eggie (2024-09-05 15:34:01+00:00): Zie feedback
user_21759646 (2024-09-06 10:54:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4422373