piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-03-31 15:09:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 15 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1494631327 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1494631328 v1 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1494631326 v1 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180678785
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-31 16:07:25+00:00): I think some areas are not mapped correctly. It may be best to revert this changeset. Sorry for bringing this up.
Sixline00 (2026-03-31 18:37:02+00:00): I live and work in this town. I am actually part of the management running the bahria town. I have the actual construction drawings and maps of the town. Please explain of what's wrong with the edits.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-01 05:50:17+00:00): Thank you for your reply, I appreciate it. I am happy to explain some of the mapping issues I noticed.

Some of the ways you mapped intersect with other ways without sharing a common node. This is problematic because it prevents proper routing; navigation tools rely on connected nodes to calculate routes correctly. See
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1494631331
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1494631330

Additionally, several of the areas you mapped appears to be a roughly drawn rectangle placed over existing map features. It overlaps with an already established landuse=residential area, which makes the mapping inconsistent and, in my opinion, unnecessary. See 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1494631323
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1494631324
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1494631325

Could you please review and correct at least these issues?
Sixline00 (2026-04-01 08:11:24+00:00): Thanks for pointing out. Correction done.
Jordi MF (2026-03-31 18:26:58+00:00): Bienvenida AINHOAA,

En primer lugar, muchas gracias por mejorar los datos de OSM. 
Te escribo para compartirte los criterios por los que se usa la etiqueta leisure=park en OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park
Como puedes ver en las imágenes, los "park", que podríamos traducir como "parques" deben de tener una gran extensión, muchas zonas verdes en estado semisilvestre, caminos y alguna. Por esta razón, elementos como los que has añadido (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1494632419) es preferible buscar otra etiqueta que describa mejor la realidad. En este caso, al tratarse de una zona ajardinada, sería mejor usar leisure=garden. Así, pueds tenerlo en cuenta para futuras ediciones. 
Saludos cordiales
jengelh (2026-04-10 08:02:23+00:00): Ich find's ziemlich ungeil, wenn hier einfach Imports gemacht werden, ohne zu prüfen, dass die Leitung in OSM schon hinterlegt ist.
way 1480234824
Map_HeRo (2026-04-12 14:06:16+00:00): Und wäre es darüber hinaus nicht notwendig, einen Import vorher gemäß der Richtlinien abzustimmen? Ist die Quelle für uns legal nutzbar?
silversurfer83 (2026-04-12 15:10:40+00:00): Hi Oberaffe

Wie ist denn die Lage: Hast du ne Freigabe für die Quelle?
Oberaffe (2026-04-12 15:48:41+00:00): Hi, hochdiskutiert das Kabel hier.;-) Ich hab leider das proposed:line übersehen. (ausgeblendet) Sorry!
Zum Thema Quelle, soweit ich die regeln verstanden habe, kann man Daten in die man seinen eigenen Hirnschmalz reingesteckt hat eintragen. Es gib auf der Webseite ja keine direkt eintragbaren Daten. Ich habe versucht aus den Planfeststellungsdaten die auf der Webseite vorhanden waren, den verlauf  so gut wie möglich nachzubauen. Nicht umsonst werden die dort veröffentlicht damit jeder weiß wo die langlaufen. Ich sah deshalb auch kein Problem diese zu integrieren in OSM. Falls ihr denkt das das nicht passt, dann lösche ich sie wieder. Grüße
Map_HeRo (2026-04-12 21:02:53+00:00): Also einfach so wieder löschen wäre die ultima ratio, es wäre eine Schande im Hinblick auf die Heidenarbeit, die Du Dir da gemacht hast. Da geht es ja nicht nur um ein paar Meter Trasse, sondern 4 separat erfasste Kabel quer durch die halbe Republik. 

In Anbetracht des Umfangs von den beiden CS 180679071+180681231
hast Du das ja nicht händisch im Editor erfasst, sondern irgendwoher importiert. Dafür gibt es Regeln, siehe:
 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

und ein wesentlicher Punkt dabei ist, ob die Quelle der Daten für OSM nutzbar ist. Im vorliegenden Fall kann ich das nicht beurteilen, aber ich würde es grundsätzlich für angebracht halten, diesen Import im Forum vorzustellen. Wenn es keine Bedenken gibt, kann er ja auch als Blaupause für die noch fehlenden Südlink-Abschnitte verwendet werden.

Ich bin übrigens nur durch Zufall auf Deine Arbeit gestoßen, weil ich vor Ort in eine Südlink-Baustelle gelaufen bin, betrachte mich also nicht als Experten. Siehe: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/neue-sudlink-trasse-mappen/142997
NeisBot (2026-03-31 15:21:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/692718622 v4 | 13 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/6503423703 v5

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180679363
NeisRevert (2026-03-31 16:02:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/180681182
where the comment is: "Remove potential fire hose cabinet locations"
olo81 (2026-03-31 16:47:30+00:00): Dlaczego nadałeś drodze dwie takie sama nazwy?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-08 17:21:51+00:00): konkretnie o https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173155993 chodzi

po co to name_1 ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-25 07:56:50+00:00): po co to name_1 ?
C2oc4 (2026-07-11 06:49:42+00:00): poprawiono
t_ja (2026-04-02 20:12:34+00:00): Ahoj,
odporucam nastudovat si vyznam "designated": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#List_of_possible_values

Pri chodcoch a cyklistoch je to jasne - existuju znacky "cesticka pre chodcov" (220) a "cyklisticka komunikacia" (221), pripadne ich kombinacie (222)/(223). Pre motorove vozidla sa ziadna obdobna znacka v meste nepouziva, a mimo mesta mesta snad len "cesta pre motorove vozidla" (311). 

Preto otagovat chodniky na cintorine ako "motor_vehicle=designated" je uplne zle. Naopak, pri vjazde je exlicitny "zakaz vjazdu pre vsetky vozidla" (231), s doplnkovou tabulou, preto by sa tam hodilo "motor_vehicle=private": https://www.google.sk/maps/place/Martina+R%C3%A1zusa+14,+010+01+%C5%BDilina/@49.2239159,18.7313527,3a,43.8y,167.85h,89.74t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1secL0SZ5hKBts8p0I4DN7XQ!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D0.26185049476147526%26panoid%3DecL0SZ5hKBts8p0I4DN7XQ%26yaw%3D167.85376027739235!7i16384!8i8192!4m6!3m5!1s0x47145ea10898980d:0x4ac4f66d4888cd1a!8m2!3d49.224016!4d18.731089!16s%2Fg%2F11ypgsp73w?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDMzMS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D

Prosim o opravu.

T.
osmviborg (2026-03-31 15:33:57+00:00): Måske bedre med: https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=Names#Local_names_(loc_name)
Dimitar155 (2026-04-01 18:11:59+00:00): Здравей Боби, Обнових имената на "Жад"-ите и "Мони"-те, понеже ги имаше на доста места. Сега са само на сградите. Махнах и "building" и "сграда", понеже ми бъркат в здравето :)
Boyan Alexiev (2026-06-29 12:43:20+00:00): Благодаря Митко, сега вече е удоволствие за сетивата да гледаме проектите ;)
iandees (2026-03-31 16:03:57+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1599535448 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180681255, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
streckenkundler (2026-03-31 16:15:28+00:00): Danke!
streckenkundler (2026-03-31 19:56:14+00:00): Guten Abend,

... so... das Thema entwickelt sich...
Nebenan, in Lehde hat man ein Fahrradtreppenlift von VeloComfort errichtet. In der Lausitzer Rundschau, von Heute. 31.3.2026 ist das thematisiert. Ich habe da auch ein Beitrag im Forum erstellt: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/fahrrad-und-treppen/142746

Ich will dir das nur zu Kenntnis geben...

Danke für deine Arbeit und viele Grüße,

Sven
CAM-Gerlach (2026-04-01 08:17:44+00:00): Thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180681484
iandees (2026-03-31 16:27:03+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13688807219 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180682238, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
EneaSuper (2026-04-01 12:01:48+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che hai erroneamente creato questa way, potresti eliminarla per cortesia? 🙂

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/552910025#map=18/44.503274/8.892226
nilloc29 (2026-04-11 15:47:03+00:00): I am curious about your intent with the road buffers. The entire parcel is owned by the BLM. They also do not line up well with the roads in the parcel. The way they render in GAIA made me think that there was a BLM ROW through another ownership.
qstep (2026-07-28 17:22:23+00:00): Szia. A way/1494651668 szerintem nem a pláza része.
toboz (2026-07-31 12:43:50+00:00): Szia! Köszi az észrevételt! Véletlenül a gimnáziumhoz is hozzáadtam emeleteket. Mindjárt leveszem ezeket.
DaveF (2026-04-01 16:40:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1494652558
Are you certain this is a cycleway? The pavements outside Boots look a bit narrow & from YT videos I can't spot cycle signage that side of the road.
Alec Coates (2026-04-01 17:22:08+00:00): Yes, I was there on Monday. They've extended the curb out a bit and there's also a small ramp for bikes to get onto the pavement right outside Boots.
nevw (2026-06-19 23:16:35+00:00): Hi, can you fix this invalid multipolygon thanks.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.09650&lat=-8.13982&zoom=15
felipeeugenio (2026-03-31 20:18:47+00:00): That is a living_street I think. And private.

regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180683638
Hightide10 (2026-04-01 16:10:31+00:00): Hello felipeeugenio,

Thank you for the further edit here. I also agree with your addition of a barrier as well as private access tagging given Mapillary imagery from 2024 (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-34.87119719999998&lng=-71.22663290000003&z=17&pKey=1238952580752143&focus=photo) supports a gate addition and that this is likely a private neighborhood.
felipeeugenio (2026-04-01 18:06:57+00:00): Hello. Thanks for the attitude.
If you need anything, you can contact me.
This is more likely a single terrain, big as rural terrain can be, and they just built a lot of houses. It could be a =service too, but anyway...


regards
Andrea Del Sarto (2026-04-01 06:52:17+00:00): ciao forcella,

Ho notato alcune modifiche recenti ai percorsi escursionistici nella zona, in particolare riguardo ai tag relativi alla classificazione dei percorsi

Alcune modifiche che hai fatto sembrano non seguire queste linee guida. Potrebbe esserci stato un fraintendimento? Se vuoi possiamo confrontarci e uniformare i tag così da mantenere i dati consistenti e utili per tutti

sulla base della classificazione dei percorsi escursionistici del Club Alpino Italiano (https://www.cai.it/attivita/livelli-difficolta-cai-attivita/) questo percorso ricade nel livello T non E.

aggiungo linee guida OSM/CAI per inserimento percorsi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI

saluti e buona mappatura
forcella (2026-04-02 07:19:49+00:00): Buongiorno Andrea , mi fa piacere conoscerti, personalmente
Ho provato a cambiare ed aggiungere i tag. perche il sentiero non viene inserito in osm2cai. e non so se è un problema della piattaforma o sono i tag non completi , avevo riscontrato che anche il senzo di marcia era sbagliato, corretto nel senso giusto , ma il tracciato non entra in osm2cai.
per quanto riguarda i livelli de difficoltà, ho percorso tante volte il tracciato, e non lo considero Turistico, anche considerando che prima di diventare 937A era 937 ed era classificato E. 
Comunque Andrea se mi puoi aiutare a capire il perche il sentiero non viene inserito su osm2cai ti sarei molto lieto 
se mi vuoi chiamare 3341368486 massimo bellacci , commissione sentieri,
felipeeugenio (2026-03-31 19:50:04+00:00): Hello., Are you sure the residential road is the small one and the bigger one is just a service?
For what I understand, you are using the regular esri pictures.

regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180683886
Hightide10 (2026-04-01 16:09:59+00:00): Hello, felipeeugenio

Thank you for the feedback, given what is seen in Esri World Imagery, I agree with your suggestion on switching the classifications of service and residential so the classifications better reflect what we can see in imagery. The portion of residential way 1494658292 (openstreetmap.org/way/1494658292) between node 3922659840 and node 9334319752 can be changed to service and way 1011706786 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1011706786) can be changed to residential. 

I can switch those classifications if you would prefer?
felipeeugenio (2026-04-01 18:17:55+00:00): Hello. Thanks for the attitude.

Sad, because I drove the Camino Quebrada Grande on saturday.

It is not a matter of my preferences, but the real use and purpose of every road. Sadly, it seems that all those roads and the whole residential zone behind are under construction. I thought you were using newer pictures.... But your proposal seems reasonable. Let´s apply it.


regards
Hightide10 (2026-04-02 14:34:45+00:00): Hi felipeeugenio,

I have made the agreed edit here in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180737229).

Thank you
yelisey90 (2026-04-01 08:32:10+00:00): Was moving this node intentional or not? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6893244149
ilias_ (2026-04-01 00:15:50+00:00): Bonjour Hiba, excellent travail. Les seuls conseils que je pourrais te donner :

- Pas besoin de mettre addr:city=Casablanca
- building=residential est un tag très général, il vaut mieux utiliser building=apartments pour ces immeubles
- Es-tu sûre de height=15 ? Ou est-ce une valeur par défaut (3 mètres par étages) ?
- Au lieu d'utiliser le tag name, il faut utiliser le tag addr:housename. Tu y as mis IMM (immeuble j'imagine ?) mais il faut simplement mettre addr:housename=R23.

Bienvenue.
iandees (2026-03-31 17:37:40+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10292238083 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180685388, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
bxl-forever (2026-03-31 22:28:58+00:00): Hello,

There was a long discussion prior to mapping this area.

leaf_type=mixed was chosen because this is a very special area that honours the Miyawaki method of planting..
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5186916

I see you changed this.  Was it based on a survey?  Have they changed the concept and replanted something else?

Thanks.
Joske1020 (2026-04-01 17:53:01+00:00): 20 different species were used, but all of them are still broadleaved. I don't know what fits better, but i think that leaf_type=mixed a mix is of needle- and broadleaved trees is.
Joske1020 (2026-04-01 17:54:14+00:00): look at the wiki page for more clarification.
SomeoneElse (2026-04-07 20:32:03+00:00): Thanks
silversurfer83 (2026-04-01 18:40:25+00:00): Hi

nun ist die Adresse verloren gegangen. Steht das Gebäude noch? Dann bitte dort die Adresse eintragen, die vorher am Gelände war. Ist das Gebäude abgerissen sollte dies mit Lebenszyklus Präfix kenntlich gemacht werden.

Antworten auf meine Kommentare vereinfachen übrigens unsere Arbeit hier dramatisch
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180685741
Tomas Straupis (2026-03-31 18:23:51+00:00): Peržiūrėjau. Greičiau lyg ir gerai. Kelių klasifikacijos keisti nereikia, ji buvo gera. Atstačiau service, kur buvo neteisingai pakeista į residential. Sėkmės!
Wildsharky (2026-04-03 06:05:01+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180757983
Tuplanolla (2026-04-03 16:45:00+00:00): Näyttääkö tämä umpeenkasvaneelta? Polun voi palauttaa kartalle ilman `trail_visibility=bad` merkintää.

https://users.jyu.fi/~sapekiis/tmp/180685923-up.jpg

https://users.jyu.fi/~sapekiis/tmp/180685923-down.jpg
Dawid2849 (2026-04-01 12:47:02+00:00): Hola hola, ale w tej samej propozycji było jednoczesne obniżenie DK1... Zabrałem się już za to
intransan123 (2026-04-01 13:11:17+00:00): Fuck, zapomniałem o tym... Dzięki
JeroenHoek (2026-03-31 19:26:15+00:00): Bedoeld je in plaats van description=* niet inscription=*?
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Bartekkmee (2026-03-31 18:07:40+00:00): UWAGA! *Osiedle "Mistral", nie "Na Fali". mała pomyłka.
Wildsharky (2026-04-03 06:03:22+00:00):  Reverted in changeset id:180747414
BCNorwich (2026-04-01 05:40:20+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The houses look much better if squared up. Thats shortcut "Q" in the ID editor you're using. I've squared uo numbers 69 and 70.

Regards Bernard.
MichelleMapsss (2026-04-01 15:50:17+00:00): Hi Bernard,

Thanks for your message and for some of the area, that really helped!

I’m currently mapping on mobile, so I’m not entirely sure how to square up buildings or make them look as neat as you did. If there’s a way to do that on mobile (or an easier method), I’d really appreciate any guidance.

I’ve also made some new edits on the area, so if you’re able to take a look at those as well and help make them look more neat, that would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks again for your help!
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
NeisRevert (2026-04-02 06:41:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/180751801
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
DressyPear4 (2026-04-01 18:25:00+00:00): Todo nome de rua deve começar com prefixo

Rua
Avenida 
Travessa
etc...
NeisBot (2026-03-31 18:30:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1494692387 v1 | 7 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180687382
NeisReview (2026-04-08 22:33:11+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180733677
Ltrlg (2026-04-04 07:54:33+00:00): Il y a une indication de durée des travaux ? En général si ça dure moins d’un mois ce n’est pas trop la peine de modifier OSM.
mw014 (2026-04-04 09:02:15+00:00): Ah d'accord, je vérifierai à l'avenir, en attendant je supprime mes modifications dans le doute
eggie (2026-03-31 19:06:49+00:00): Hoi...
Tip.. wanneer er geen G7 bord staat en er dus gefietst mag worden kun je beter highway=path gebruiken ipv footway.
Op een footway mag niet gefietst worden behalve bij een onderbord.. fietsen toegestaan.
Groet,
eggie
ottoco (2026-04-01 15:33:04+00:00): Moet deze G7 nog vermeld worden bij deze node/weg?
eggie (2026-04-01 15:37:23+00:00): Wanneer er een G7 bord staat kun je traffoc_sign=NL:G7 toevoegen aan het pad.
Staat het er niet dan weglaten.
Op een G7 pad mag je niet fietsen behalve bij een uitzonderings onderbord.
Mapse
eggie (2026-04-01 15:37:44+00:00): Typo traffic_sign
NeisBot (2026-03-31 18:36:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13682789721 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Orthodontic clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-08 22:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181071857
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 11:05:18+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset 184907797

https://osm.org/changeset/184907797
eggie (2026-03-31 19:17:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Lijkt me oke. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-03-31 18:48:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13696008257 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Puerta de entrada"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-08 22:33:07+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/180688949
rempshaener (2026-04-01 18:00:11+00:00): Hallo,
die Straße ist noch nie als hw=secondary gepflegt gewesen.
Es handelt sich auf Grund der verkehrlichen Bedeutung um eine einfache hw=residential.
Bitte stelle sie wieder auf diesen Wert zurück.
Viele Grüße