piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-11 23:22:37+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18335
canfe (2025-07-27 05:51:23+00:00): C'è un pezzo di bialere di Magliano che è +1, il che vuol dire che è sospesa.
Non può essere dalle foto aeree
Paolitosss (2025-08-01 19:26:24+00:00): Ok, corretto, grazie per la segnalazione
Famlam (2025-06-15 12:37:40+00:00): Kun je bij informele paden zoals je zandpaadje ook informal=yes toevoegen?
Langlaeufer (2025-06-11 18:46:16+00:00): Da ist noch ein Fehler von vorher: Lieververkehr frei ist jetzt doppelt, vielleicht so? DE:244.1,DE:[Einfahrt in die Grundstücke frei],DE:1026-35
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167479574
Nadjita (2025-06-12 09:54:42+00:00): Ich hätte jetzt vorgeschlagen DE:244.1,DE:1020[Einfahrt in die Grundstücke frei],DE:1026-35

aber vielleicht gibt's ja irgendwann Feedback im Forums-Thread.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167479574
gscholz (2026-01-10 08:05:09+00:00): Hi Armire,
this here is another example where you wrongly assigned the relation roles "inner" and "outer". Can you please fix this?

Here is an overview map, where you can see all your errors in this area:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=1.10427&lat=47.24008&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=role_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cways

Can you provide feedback about your idea, when to fix these issues?

Guido
saman83 (2025-06-25 09:59:59+00:00): Unfortunately, this user has corrupted the map and deleted the side road that was drawn based on the aerial map.
bxl-forever (2025-06-11 09:40:34+00:00): Hello,

This relation is a route for pedestrians. If you route it across cycleways, make sure to modify the permissions on those cycleways accordingly, e.g. by adding foot=* and segregated=* tags.  In the current situation, the route issues warnings because it uses ways where walking is not permitted.
JannesBraet (2025-06-11 15:26:08+00:00): Okay, should be fixed now
Dani CS (2025-06-27 21:39:16+00:00): Bonjour !
Je remarque que la route ajoutée ici passe, à Montrichard, par la Rue Vieille de Tours depuis le Quai du Cher, et ne prend pas la nouvelle piste cyclable le long de l’écluse (eg. way/1163874239 et autres). Est-ce voulu ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167480236
BAGgeraar (2025-07-09 14:41:07+00:00): Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/689652252/ : waarom kan de maximale snelheid niet in km/h aangegeven worden?
janhals (2025-07-10 06:50:41+00:00): Dag Baggeraar, bedankt voor het signaleren van deze fout. Ik heb het veranderd. Groet Jan.
user_5359 (2025-06-12 18:40:14+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1394130843 (one of ten objects). Waht is the mean of the tag payu = zobaczycmorze ?
Pooh01 (2025-06-13 06:00:42+00:00): Mistake. Corrected!
Sylabowy Kot (2025-06-11 09:30:54+00:00): Poprawiłem i wyrównałem też lekko obszary kilku kwietników, a tym samym Placu co doprowadziło do tego bboxa.
Diego Krein (2026-06-18 21:32:44+00:00): Se modificó el nombre de la Calle Brasil por Santos Serfaty, segun ORDENANZA 672 publicada en boletin oficial de fecha 18/07/2024.
https://www.boletindigital.misiones.gov.ar/boletines/16156%20firmado.pdf
NorthCrab_upload (2025-06-11 09:51:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7049186411
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387447062

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Baloo Uriza (2025-07-23 21:58:14+00:00): This appears to be some kind of barrier, not a gap.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167482352
Lkumar_lyft (2025-08-06 05:02:32+00:00): Hi, Baloo Uriza,
My name is Lalit, and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft.
Since the road maintains its integrity here, it is indeed more appropriate to add a barrier rather than separating the roads. I apologize for this correction. Thank you for addressing it.
Best regards, Lalit
Sylabowy Kot (2025-06-11 09:51:50+00:00): Osiedle nie ma mapki, ale są podane zasoby, które mogą pomóc wskazać utworzenie obszaru: https://wsmochota.com.pl/spoldzielnia/osiedle-gorlicka/zasoby-gorlicka/

W ramach wspomnianej w źródle dyskusji przetoczyła się nazwa "Osiedle Astronautów", jednakże nie uzyskano jakiejkolwiek odpowiedzi, czym jest pomimo tego, że m.in. bloki przy ul. Astronautów wchodzą w obszar zdefiniowanego publicznie Osiedla Gorlicka.
NieWnen (2025-08-29 14:15:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171181412
ieguy2 (2025-06-11 09:56:07+00:00): I honestly don't get the point of the horse trails. none of these homes you can have a horse.
aharvey (2025-06-13 00:49:44+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056843378 commercial? If so what kind of commercial, offices? Because now we have building=commercial + residential=apartments which can't go together.
redd (2025-06-11 10:13:48+00:00): habe diesen Knoten zu generischem Ladentyp geändert nach OSM Note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4739391 und Kommentar des letzten Changesets
Tomas Straupis (2025-06-11 14:12:42+00:00): Na nėra čia jokio istorinio objekto - ištryniau. Kokia prasmė kažkur ne savo šalyje nesąmones žymėti?
Adam Hauner (2025-06-16 12:35:46+00:00): I'm sorry if I evaluated map incorrectly. I'm trying to improve maps around the world and in this case I probably chosen wrong map layer, where building in ruin state was still present. I'm sorry, I can't localize deleted area 1394141236.
Tomas Straupis (2025-06-16 16:34:50+00:00): Hello. Please stop randomly doing changes without local knowledge. I have repeated several times that landuse=basin is used in Lithuania and asked you to stop damaging that data, but for some reason you continue doing that. You're NOT helping at all, why do you continue?
Adam Hauner (2025-06-19 09:45:32+00:00): Hi Tomas, I did not previously notice your comments about basin (only about historical building - OSM to my knowledge has not any form of notification for such comments or I did not found it), so I do deeply apologize for continuing with this changes, which I already stopped. Thank you for reverting my changes.

I was asked by iD editor, that water area has obsoleted tags and if I want to convert it to updated values. I followed instructions. I think that would be great to deal it primary with OSM team, that these tags are not marked obsoleted for Lithuania.

I'm sorry.
Tomas Straupis (2025-06-19 10:07:42+00:00): All is fine, fixed now. Unfortunately iD is a very bad editor, we instruct all local mappers to not take any of its "advice". Good luck!
map per (2025-06-12 12:34:06+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
gabro00 (2025-06-11 20:42:07+00:00): Review-t kértél, jónak néz ki.
redd (2025-06-11 10:17:38+00:00): Erfassung anhand Foto eines OSM Hinweises: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4724448
redd (2025-06-11 10:19:40+00:00): Bank nach Hinweis geloescht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4795474
Pilsetkartetajs (2025-06-12 19:31:04+00:00): Labdien!
Izmaiņas atcēlu, nepamatoti dzēsts esošs ceļš.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167548857
richlv (2025-06-14 06:41:24+00:00): Sveiki, kas te noticis - vai ceļš bija pilnībā zudis, vai tomēr palicis un, piemēram, pieejams kājām ejot?
Hugoren Martinako (2025-11-05 15:01:21+00:00): Hi there, you cannot create admin boundaries (9/10) with no official sources.

In Spain, only some communities set official sub-divisions (for municipalities) and, afaik, Illes Balears do not. Therefore, none of the boudaries you created in this changeset are valid.

Regards
thefabi (2025-11-11 14:47:30+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for your information. I used information from the specified source, which shows the names and, in most cases, the boundaries of residential areas. In JOSM the source is now known as Spain base map instead of Mapa base de España. If this is incorrect, I will revert it.

Regards
Hugoren Martinako (2025-11-11 15:41:18+00:00): You're mixing concepts: in the Spain base map, you'll find residential areas, which corresponds with a way landuse=residential. That's all.

Administrative boundaries, both ways and relations, with admin_level (9 or 10) tags, roles admin_centre, and so on... only can be defined by the local administration. I see you've added them both Eivissa and Santa Eulàlia... but you need the official source (SHP or similar) that defines the boundaries of the neighborhoods.

Regards
thefabi (2025-11-18 14:26:42+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for your answer i revert it. 

For Eivissa i used the following source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Barris_d%27Eivissa.svg

During my research, I discovered that until a few days ago, a similar version was also available on the Ajuntament d'Eivissa website:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130618083911/https://www.eivissa.es/portal/images/stories/BARRIS.gif

Boundaries (9/10) seems to exist on the Illes Balears. For example, in Palma de Mallorca: https://pmi.palmademallorca.es/cartografia_palma/districtes/Palma_districtes_barris.pdf

Regards
Hugoren Martinako (2025-11-19 15:07:43+00:00): Hallo,

You cannot use a wikipedia/wikidata as a source of truth, you'll need something more official, like the Ajuntament d'Eivissa website you provided (pdf version: https://www.eivissa.es/documents/34357/51577/BARRIS.pdf). Notice there are some hoods still missing.

Usually the major cities have these boundaries defined by its own administration, not always though.

I saw your revert changeset. If there's no official source, that's how it should be then.

Thanks & Regards
Comino (2025-06-11 18:39:43+00:00): Hi Moonlight Leather,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants

Happy mapping,

Edwin
marczoutendijk_repair (2025-08-12 13:49:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 170343370 where the changeset comment is: ¨DWG
NorthCrab_upload (2025-06-11 10:40:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12733204894

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Marek-M (2025-06-11 11:20:43+00:00): Już poprawione :)
Bem Mapas (2025-08-04 12:35:33+00:00): Aqui a sinalização é de 60 km/h!
ilias_ (2025-06-11 13:50:37+00:00): Il existe déjà

https://www.osm.org/node/12438400700
dadavid (2025-06-11 11:06:20+00:00): hi, 

you've requested feedback on this edit. 

looks good! 

happy mapping :)

David
dadavid (2025-06-11 11:03:28+00:00): Hi, 

is this a recreational park (leisure=park) as you tagged it or is it a private parking lot (amenity=parking
parking=surface
access=private
)?

see the wiki for additional info

greetings

David

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
buy_osmand (2025-06-20 20:52:54+00:00): hi Laveure, your changeset comment is too brief fyip, it lead me to thinking that the prior mapper was of ill intent however in my investigations it's nothing of sorts.. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111497549/history/1

Once again, please be more verbose in the changeset comments especially if i or anybody else is deleting nodes with relations

Alhamdullilah..
Lucas Santana (2025-06-12 22:11:22+00:00): Você alterou
maxspeed:hgv para	80 na br 381 veículos pesados deveriam trafegar a 60
Lucas Santana (2025-06-12 22:18:18+00:00): maxspeed:hgv	deveria ser 60
marczoutendijk_repair (2025-08-12 13:49:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 170343370 where the changeset comment is: ¨DWG
trigpoint (2026-03-11 15:13:27+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/179707075
eggie (2025-06-11 11:56:24+00:00): Dag Margaret.. Die oprit loopt toch echt ietsje zuidelijker langs het hek. Ik heb 'm aangepast.
MVG
eggie
margaret_gustin (2025-06-11 12:07:56+00:00): dank!
StC (2025-07-05 07:38:43+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
marczoutendijk_repair (2025-08-12 13:49:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 170343370 where the changeset comment is: ¨DWG
mcliquid (2025-06-11 12:02:16+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

The tagging of the wikidata values is wrong, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:brand:wikidata

And please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
pjw1965 (2025-06-11 13:22:39+00:00): Hi

> The tagging of the wikidata values is wrong, 
Yes, sorry forget the "Q"

I also will add a changeset per city.

Thanks.

- Peter.
J budissin (2025-07-24 10:35:07+00:00): What's the source for the Czech names for those Sorbian villages?
ramthelinefeed (2025-06-12 08:41:02+00:00): Hello, this edit seems to have caused several PTv2 bus routes stretching across Ireland to become invalid! :)  I noticed it with the Translink X1, X2 & 785, using the https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/ tool. But I think it may have scuppered more than just those three. Could you check?
flohoff (2025-06-12 10:48:26+00:00): Nur als Feedback - Das routing in der Routingüberwachung von mir ist schön auf die Umgehung geschwenkt - So sollte das vermutlich für den Durchgangsverkehr sein:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=1034461,1064951#50.99582,5.99592,15z
aixbrick (2025-06-12 11:35:23+00:00): Hallo,
korrekt, so ist das von der Gemeinde beabsichtigt, siehe Quelle.
Gruß
rempshaener (2025-06-11 18:37:19+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Die Ergänzung der Adresse an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539148310 führt leider zu Dubletten, da die Adressen bereits hier www.osm.org/node/7917827255 und hier www.osm.org/node/7917827256 erfasst sind.
Daher schlage ich vor, die Adresse hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539148310 wieder zu entfernen. (Ein kleiner Hinweis zur Syntax: das „23/25“ wäre durch „23;25“ besser abgebildet gewesen).

Ich habe ausnahmsweise selbst schon eine kleine Anpassung vorgenommen, da dir der Punkt www.openstreetmap.org/node/30391500 um ca. 80 verrutscht war.

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen. Bitte melde dich, wenn du Fragen hast.
Viele Grüße
eggie (2025-06-11 14:13:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Heeft het instituut werkelijk ook een Engelse naam of is dit alleen maar een vertaling? 
Adresnodes  zijn als het goed is al aanwezig. 
Den Haag heb ik aangepast naar 's-Gravenhage. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
jeeehaaa (2025-06-11 14:49:04+00:00): Bedankt voor het welkom en de intro die je prive hebt gestuurd. 
Ik ben het eens met je aanpassing. 
Wat betreft de naamvoering: In de communicatie wordt de naamvoering gebruikt zoals ik die heb aangegeven in het Nederlands en in het Engels. Internationaal wordt daadwerkelijk de Engelse variant gebruikt. 

Vraag: wordt de pin/pointer automatisch verplaatst na wijzigen van het adres? Ik had nu na wijzigen van het adres van de pin 'SWOV' deze handmatig verplaatst, maar misschien is dat niet de bedoeling en had ik de oude pointer moeten verwijderen en SWOV aan het bestaande adres Henri Faasdreef 312 moeten toevoegen. Het betreft een bedrijfsverzamelgebouw.  

mvg, jeeehaaa
eggie (2025-06-11 15:24:21+00:00): Dag jeeehaaa,

Nee wanneer je een adres verandert gaat niet de node naar de nieuwe locatie. Het is dus zaak om de oude adresnode leeg te halen  en op op de  nieuwe locatie weer toe te voegen. 
Alleen de oude locatie had geen adres in dit geval.
Soms levert dat schuiven op de kaart schadse op omdat je onbewust objecten kunt verplaatsen... vandaar mijn opmerking.
Op de nieuwe locatie is de adresnode al bezet door het CBS. 
Altijd lastig als meer instellingen hetzelfde adres hanteren.
In dit geval is het verder correct zo.
MVG
eggie
jeeehaaa (2025-06-11 19:03:35+00:00): Helder, dankjewel
Metzor (2025-06-12 18:24:38+00:00): Hallo Philipp,

Kleiner Tipp:
Q - ausgewählte geschlossene Linie (Fläche) rechtwinklig ausrichten.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:ID/Shortcuts


Das würde z.B. diesem Umriss eines Gebäudes für tun:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4112210051#map=19/48.493324/8.723311

Happy Mapping!
Metzor
Philiqq (2025-06-12 20:10:34+00:00): Hi Metzor, 

mache ich inzwischen so. 
Vielen Dank für deinen Hinweis. 

Viele Grüße
ratrun (2025-06-12 03:39:23+00:00): Hallo!

Der Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/906995423#map=19/49.484344/8.463547 endet im Nichts. Siehe https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=8.46332&lat=49.48409&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1.  Das kann auch für ein Bus Routing nicht richtig sein. Entweder lösche bitte das neue highway=service , verbinde den Weg mit der Hauptfahrbahn, oder setze das highway=service weiter fort bis irgendwo die normale Fahrbahn erreicht wird.
In jedem Fall fehlen weitere Tags, die beschreiben mit welchem Vehicle man dort fahren darf. Bitte diese auch ergänzen!

Danke

ratrun
Vassiliou_RNV (2025-06-12 07:49:08+00:00): Hallo Ratrun, danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe die Busbevorrechtigung korrigiert und PSV ergänzt. 
BG
bxl-forever (2025-06-11 13:02:16+00:00): Hello,
Please do not change buildings, mixing information of different objects is not a correct way to map information on OSM.
Don’t worry, we fixed your edit.
Norbert Dichter (2025-06-11 13:01:11+00:00): Dear Francisco, please retain the full changeset headers, wheren you are in project #22017

This is the full changeset comment header of the project:
#hotosm-project-22017 #omhesa, #MappingforMozambique2025 #jude-25 #tt_event #africamaps30

Validators found, you truncated them to 

#africamaps30 #tt_event #youthmappers #comunidadeyouthmappersmz
So it is not clear how to follow changesets in all cases.

Thank you anyway for your contributions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167490252
Norbert Dichter (2025-06-11 13:07:24+00:00): Dear Chongojoao, please retain the full changeset headers, when you are in project #22017

This is the full changeset comment header of the project:
#hotosm-project-22017 #omhesa, #MappingforMozambique2025 #jude-25 #tt_event #africamaps30

Validators found, you truncated them to

#africamaps30 #tt_event #youthmappers #comunidadeyouthmappersmz
So it is not clear how to follow changesets in all cases.

Thank you anyway for your contributions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167490283
evgenykatyshev (2025-06-11 16:39:19+00:00): Are you sure about house number? 

As I can see, there is plaque with number 5 https://yandex.com.ge/maps/-/CHSDQP-V

Also number 5 is represented in Georgian cadastre map: https://maps.gov.ge/map/portal#state/point=44.7523409236876,41.74051500181915&zoom=19.763074808044387&projection=EPSG:4326&layers=92,97,402&lang=ka
yelisey90 (2025-06-11 19:05:44+00:00): Reverted: the address was mapped from the ground
evgenykatyshev (2025-06-11 16:33:35+00:00): Can pedestrian go here?
SleepyAsh (2025-06-11 16:47:15+00:00): hi, yes
SleepyAsh (2025-06-11 17:10:58+00:00): thanks, my mistake should have used barrier instead of disconnecting them, made different change
SpinOff (2025-06-13 22:07:39+00:00): Czy ta mini korekta polegała na przerwaniu ciągłości drogi dla pieszych?

Poprawiłem już, ale przyszłość polecam ten artykuł: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
BCNorwich (2025-06-11 15:14:08+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've added the address and website to the POI. OSM routes to Cranberry Lane very close to the POI. Google Maps take you further north on Cranberry Lane, close to Daisy Road. This is because the POI on Google Maps is incorrectly placed.

Regards Bernard
perusluku (2025-06-11 13:20:14+00:00): Forumin*
Maryna Makarava (2025-06-17 09:01:58+00:00): Hello, mona_magdy!
Could you please clarify the reason for remodelling roundabout into a dual carriageway on the intersection? Latest OSM source has roundabout there. In your comment you do not specify what other evidence you use for making such changes. Would you mind giving more context of your edit? We want to make sure it’s aligned with the OSM editing guidelines.
mona_magdy (2025-06-18 07:50:13+00:00): Hello, Maryna Makarava;
I would like to thank you for your contribution to improving the United Arab Emirates maps on OSM. I would like to inform you that I am part of a team working on updating and improving the quality of road maps in the United Arab Emirates. We have our recent satellite images, and I have converted this intersection from a roundabout to a dual carriageway based on a recent image dated (Maxar satellite imagery via MGP Pro 2025-06-10), Also you can check through the Sentinel website (https://browser.dataspace.copernicus.eu/?zoom=17&lat=25.24761&lng=55.28384&themeId=DEFAULT-THEME&visualizationUrl=U2FsdGVkX19VuEYB5K2SXVHzwKKrwoQqpXKHZpFkGMO2aYnuWOUicrWxuh8GN5rI681a2s6Bu0CswKRMyCzLYToxRgIrVPGUHSv%2Fb0j5KLXNWbPRuTAiAbboqUUugfem&datasetId=S2_L2A_CDAS&fromTime=2024-12-18T00%3A00%3A00.000Z&toTime=2025-06-18T23%3A59%3A59.999Z&layerId=1_TRUE_COLOR&demSource3D=%22MAPZEN%22&cloudCoverage=30&dateMode=MOSAIC).
Regards
mona_magdy
Maryna Makarava (2025-06-20 12:33:40+00:00): Thank for your clarification! Best regards, Maryna
mona_magdy (2025-06-22 14:21:55+00:00): Thanks
10_Aittam_01 (2025-06-11 13:20:18+00:00): errore
ivanbranco (2025-06-11 13:31:04+00:00): Errore nel senso che non volevi cancellarla?
10_Aittam_01 (2025-06-11 14:45:38+00:00): Si, riusciresti a reinserirla ?
ivanbranco (2025-06-11 17:36:42+00:00): fatto

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167502193
eggie (2025-06-11 14:15:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
muralito (2025-06-12 01:32:27+00:00): Hi. Please don't add these kind of roads as "highway=residential". At most they are highway=service and private.
KwandoRiver (2025-06-13 15:46:45+00:00): Hello muralito, thank you for letting me know about the classification inconsistency for these roadways and the guidance towards the accurate tagging. I will look to apply this in the future when considering edits that involve similar feature types. Thanks again for the guidance over this and happy mapping
yelisey90 (2025-06-11 19:27:08+00:00): fixed
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167506197
Bobropiton (2025-06-11 13:56:57+00:00): маршруты в Никольском/Саблино
sly (2025-11-17 15:55:11+00:00): Salut Casoum,
Je voudrais évoquer avec toi le contour du massif de la Lauzière.
Je suis partisan d'une séparation Lauzière/Grand Arc.
Je vois que sur ce changeset tu préfères une Lauzière qui englobe le Grand Arc. Quelles sont tes sources pour prendre cette décision ?
J'ai lancé le débat sur wikipedia ici : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion:Massif_de_la_Lauzi%C3%A8re

Que penses-tu des sources que j'ai trouvé ? 
Je me doute que ce genre de détail tiré par les cheveux ne passionne pas les foules, mais on peut quand même demander l'avis d'autres contributeurs genre sur le forum de openstreetmap-france ?
bielebog (2025-06-12 08:11:50+00:00): Hallo, was befindet sich nun am alten Standort https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/68454250#map=19/51.733298/9.027607 ?