piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Michi (2025-01-21 19:58:26+00:00): IMHO ist das "Maibacherstraße" ein Schreibfehler auf dem Schild. Sowohl im Fahrplanbuch und im Liniennetzplan ist die Straße korrekt geschrieben: https://imgur.com/a/H7zibiO
Hast Du zufällig ein Foto? Dann würde ich das an den Verkehrsmeister der Stadtwerke schicken, damit die sehen, das sie hier einen Schreibfehler gemacht haben.

Frage: Wieso hast Du den Namen der Haltestelle an die platform und stop_position nodes dran gemacht? IMHO sollte der Name der Haltestelle (solang auch wirklich alle Haltepositionen usw. gleich heißen) in der stop_area-Relation reichen.
Außerdem sollten keine Abkürzungen verwendet werden, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Abk%C3%BCrzungen
("Geschw.-Scholl-Str." --> "Geschwister-Scholl-Straße")
sw_uwu (2025-01-21 21:49:02+00:00): Ich habe die genaue Beschriftung wie auf den Bushaltestellen verwendet, werde es aber schnell zur ausgeschriebenen Form ändern und die Namen bei den stop_position nodes wieder entfernen. ich dachte, dass das explizite tagging für mögliche data-consumer hilfreicher wäre.

Ein Bild kann ich gerne machen, das wird aber noch bis Sonntag dauern. Falls Du es bis dahin *nicht* mehr brauchst, geb mir bitte Bescheid

Am Besten überlasse ich Dir jegliche Bearbeitungen für das tagging der Businfrastruktur und ähnliches, da ich damit nicht wirklich vertraut bin. Die meisten edits von mir sind schließlich einfach die Karte mithilfe natural=* etc. zu verschönern :)
sw_uwu (2025-01-21 21:57:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161616736 passt das so?
Michi (2025-01-23 21:51:59+00:00): Ja, das mit den data-consumer ist so 'ne Sache. Für mich persönlich ist sowas eher ein Fall für "Tagging für den Renderer" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer) wobei hier statt renderer consumer besser ist. Schlussendlich ist der Name ja vorhanden, er ist ja in der Relation enthalten, von der die sop_position referenziert wird. Im Wiki steht auch, das der Name an die stop_position besser nur ran kommt, wenn es keine Relation gibt (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Public_Transport#Stop_Position).

stop_position bei Bussen ist ja noch einfach, da gibt es nur eine. Kompliziert wird es bei Zügen, dort gibt es wirklich unterschiedliche Stop-Positionen, je nachdem wie lang der Zug ist. :-)
lankapuhelin (2025-02-08 09:00:53+00:00): Hei! Minä merkkaisin tuon Karhunsillan nimen mieluiten nimeämällä itse siltarakenteen. Isolated dwelling ei tässä oikein toimi
viupu (2025-02-08 09:03:33+00:00): Hyvä huomio, muokkaan tuon.
felipeeugenio (2025-01-21 15:49:54+00:00): Hola Claudio. Buenas tardes.
Bienvenido a la comunidad OSM.
El Domingo le di una revisión completa a tus ediciones. Básicamente todas tenían errores tanto en su ejecución como en los conceptos detrás. Tuve que arreglarlas todas.
Ayer otro mapero dio una revisión a lo que hiciste y fue lo mismo. Ahora estoy observado que se repite la historia.
Esto es normal en quienes empiezan y nuestra labor es ayudarte. Puedes comenzar uniéndote al chat de la comunidad en Telegram en el link https://t.me/OSMcl. Ahí cientos de maperos nos hacemos preguntas y resolvemos dudas cada día en compañía de la wiki del proyecto, que es dónde se describen los usos de los tags.
Por lo pronto, veo que varias de las murallas y rejas que estás agregando deberán ser borradas. Como que las confundes con los edificios (building=yes).
Te agradecemos por favor cuidar la ortografía del proyecto, poniendo Tildes y usando mayúsculas solo cuando corresponde.
Ahora veo que tienes el cuerpo de bomberos triplicado.
Cuando termines tu sesión de hoy le doy una mirada a Longaví.

saludos
silversurfer83 (2025-01-21 19:05:52+00:00): Hi :)

du hast hier das gesamte Gelände, welches vorher als Baustelle getaggt war als Gebäude getaggt. Sicher, dass das neue Porsche Zentrum als Gebäude bis and den Bürgersteig der Große Breite und Beselerweg reicht?

Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161605364
Volker Sämann (2025-01-24 11:52:10+00:00): nein ist das firmengelände
silversurfer83 (2025-01-24 13:11:46+00:00): Alles klar. Änderst du das entsprechend?
Tommybara (2025-02-02 21:51:35+00:00): Cầu này tên nó chỉ là "Cầu Tân Kỳ Tân Quý", tự nhiên bạn đi thêm chữ "vượt" làm gì vậy? Hơn nữa cái tên "Tân Kỳ Tân Quý" cũng không có dấu gạch mà bạn thêm vào làm gì?
Taya_S (2025-02-16 13:42:47+00:00): Hello starspangledmodz,

Mapping in OpenStreetMap because you wish to play a game that uses our map is totally fine, but you are expected to follow the same mapping standards as everyone else.

There are some issues with the names you have given these landuses. Names are reserved for what objects are actually called. You can read more about it here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

I have removed the names from the objects you have added

You can read more about how to get started and good practices on our wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions

Happy mapping,
Taya Snijder
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-21 16:02:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1117261264

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
BCNorwich (2025-01-25 08:50:03+00:00): Hi, The apartment is located in the highway area. Could you tag the address and place it in the appropriate building? 

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2025-01-27 17:09:44+00:00): No response and not enough info to properly position it so removed.
Gleb_Artyomenko (2025-01-21 16:21:32+00:00): clarificarion:turn_restriction was added based on PNOA Spain and Bing Streetside 
#mapbox_roads_attributes
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:04:34+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801262
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-24 08:32:24+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 receoved no answer in discussions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175055713
AnaVrbica (2025-02-08 21:25:02+00:00): Reverted because of an added node #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162295073
citrula (2025-01-21 20:06:42+00:00): Google streetview (and almost everything else in google maps, really) is not an acceptable source for OSM contributions because the license is incompatible.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:04:28+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801260
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:04:23+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801257
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:03:25+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801243
Erik - (2025-01-22 12:47:35+00:00): Warum dürfen keine historischen Strecken und Gebäude eingezeichnet werden?
Protoxenus (2025-01-22 14:24:27+00:00): Wenn du mal die Regeln von OSM gelesen hättest, wüsstest du das.
Gruß Protoxenus
Erik - (2025-01-22 15:06:33+00:00): Danke für Ihren Tipp.

MFG. @Erik -
Siegmarer (2025-03-02 20:12:27+00:00): Wir machen das hier als Hobby und man sollte die Arbeit anderer achten, die Tag razed ist extra dafür da, dass abgebaute Bahnstrecken in der Karte verbleiben können.
Protoxenus (2025-03-03 07:53:44+00:00): Nein, 
der Wert =razed ist dazu da, um nicht mehr vorhandene Dinge, die noch auf Luftbildern sichtbar sind, nicht wieder zu kartieren. Alles was von den abgebauten Teilen des Warnemünder Bahnhofs sichtbar ist, ist auch kartiert. 
In der Geschichte der Eisenbahn wurden so ziemlich alle Bahnhöfe mehmals erweitert und umgebaut. Welche Version möchtest du da gerne erhalten haben? Alle Daten durch- und übereinander? Wo sollen die Daten her kommen? Aus gutem Grund haben sich die Initiatoren dafür entschieden, nur akuelle Daten in die DB aufzunehmen.
Eine Grundregel von OSM lautet: Überprüfbarkeit. Ich habe überprüft, dass es dort keine sichtbaren Reste anderer Gleise gibt.
Gruß Protoxenus
mueschel (2025-01-22 11:12:35+00:00): Hi,
on this traffic sign you introduced 18 new tags that are not used in any other place. A few dozen more are not documented.
Please have a look to the Wiki how traffic signs are commonly mapped - usually about 4-6 Tags are completely sufficient to describe a sign.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12520945930
Xavizard Knight (2025-01-22 18:48:03+00:00): Heyas! Thanks for pointing this out.

Your comment has made me aware of how weirdly I mapped this sign.
I used a JOSM traffic sign preset for tagging this, and it seems I applied the 
Spanish-style orientation in city sign preset, when this sign is a Catalan-style orientation in city.
The difference between the two is that the Spanish-style is colourful and bigger, while the Catalan-style is mainly in boring white background.

This sign has nine panels of destinations with different arrows, text and icons each, so it would be impossible to condense all of this into 6-ish or so tags.
The traffic sign OSM wiki page says how to map traffic signs in general (as in orientation, if it's in a pole, etc.), but not what values to use in each sign, so it doesn't help in this case.

Also, looking at the tags it put out, it seems to combine roundabout-like exit with numbered destination panels in a weird way.

I'll remove the tags and refactor this sign in an upcoming changeset.
habi (2025-01-21 16:44:00+00:00): Und kleinere Anpassungen an MOPUBE
Elizen (2025-01-30 15:03:10+00:00): Hello. Why did you change tag name:en with transliteration?
RWD (2025-02-03 10:09:15+00:00): Hello @Elizen.

Thank you for your question. Yes, I'm changing name:en tags, but you are not correct calling it transliteration, as actually it is the Belarusian Latin alphabet.

By the way how someone can request to block user here?
Elizen (2025-02-03 10:45:54+00:00): However tag name:en must contains english language and this isn't english. Maybe you should use another name:language_code?

You can report about the user at his own page.
RWD (2025-02-03 10:50:01+00:00): What do you mean saying it isn't English? It's written in Latin script and it's proper name of the place.
Elizen (2025-02-03 11:16:49+00:00): I mean If we search for the English alphabet, we won't find letters like "š", "č" etc.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Localization
Elizen (2025-02-03 11:24:53+00:00): "it's proper name of the place" what source do you use for correct english name?
RWD (2025-02-03 11:33:26+00:00): It's pretty common to have letters like ň, ü, ń, č and similar for Czechia, Poland, Serbia, Germany and others at name:en tag, so it cannot be a problem here.
mavl (2025-02-05 14:03:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162167075 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: wrong values for name:en - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161608012].
mavl (2025-02-06 11:32:21+00:00): The question has no answer "what source do you use for correct english name?"  
    
This source was used.  
  
https://knihi.com/none/Nazvy_nasielenych_punktau_Respubliki_Bielarus_djvu.zip.html#NNP.Mienskaja.djvu_383
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:03:23+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801242
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:03:17+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801237
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-21 17:01:34+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10016996894
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/706230402

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
iandees (2025-01-21 17:40:15+00:00): Hi, thanks for working on these MapRoulette projects. It looks like you put the reservoir on the wrong area, though. It probably should have gone on the whole reservoir, not just a tiny part of it. I will correct, but please keep an eye out for other changes you're making.
LivInTheLookingGlass (2025-01-21 19:28:17+00:00): Thank you. I was just moving a bit too quickly. I'll be more careful for the remainder of this set
jmarchon (2025-01-22 00:52:48+00:00): Hi Mateusz, Isn't area=yes needed for highway=footway areas?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-24 19:36:55+00:00): building= already implies area=yes, so explicit area=yes is not needed

in this case tagging is suspect in general but it was not made worse by this edit, I think
jmarchon (2025-01-24 23:40:05+00:00): That makes sense. Thanks for the explanation.
philippec (2025-01-21 18:42:20+00:00): Het is ook heel nuttig een entrance bij te tekenen.  En een ref in te vullen, ook al heeft de gemeente geen refs.
ValidDistress (2025-01-22 21:49:59+00:00): Een ref is ingevuld hier. Een toegang hoeft niet aangezien deze AED buiten hangt.
philippec (2025-01-22 23:13:19+00:00): Inderdaad, hier is het minder nuttig, maa het kan geen kwaad.  Misschien in het donker kan nog "rechts" gezegd worden.  Daarom dat ik er ook soms de lantaarnpalen bij teken.
Er zijn vele scenario's mogelijk.
Ik ga uit van de operator van de noodcentrale, die geen tijd heeft om de soms slechte foto's te interpreteren en dan maar best de location afleest.
Glassman (2025-01-21 18:45:08+00:00): Why did you remove the highway classification? Highway classification is needed for rendering and data users to be able to use the way. Please get back to me or I will be forced to revert the edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161609235
blattin82 (2025-01-21 21:09:16+00:00): I meant to remove North Nutmeg Street as it has recently become a fenced private property. I didnt mean to effect the highway
Glassman (2025-01-21 21:38:49+00:00): I went ahead and fixed some of the streets. But I need your help with the gate. Can you place a node in the way where the gate is located? I can't see it with the bing imagery. The way past the node should be tagged as access=private.
blattin82 (2025-01-21 21:44:11+00:00): Im not sure how to do that. but the gates start right where the pink and yellow coloring merge. on both nutmeg and oak
Glassman (2025-01-22 03:03:32+00:00): I don't see any gates on bing street side imagery. Can you place a couple of notes where the gates are physically located? The note tag is on the right hand side, second from the bottom. Let me know once the notes have been added.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:03:11+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801234
Grass-snake (2025-01-29 18:59:22+00:00): Здравствуйте, если уже есть название улицы на русском языке, то не нужно исправлять на другие языки. Для чеченского языка больше подойдёт name:ce=*.
luisforte (2025-01-21 18:26:37+00:00): Boas
As áreas da albufeira onde foram adicionadas as tags [natural] e [water] fazem parte de uma relação que já tem essas tags. Por isso é um erro atribuir essas tags a estas áreas (ways 157605335 e 157605229)
Luis
Ed_slv (2025-01-21 18:56:46+00:00): Olá
Muito obrigado pela informação. O iD dava mensagem de erro indicando que à linha não estava atribuida nenhuma tag, impedindo-me de gravar os elementos mapeados. Ou bug do iD ou memória insuficiente do meu PC. Foi um "artificio" para "salvar" a edição. Agradeço que corrijas  E Silva
luisforte (2025-01-21 19:31:39+00:00): Creio que ficou corrigido. Retirei as tags referidas (o editor (JOSM) também reclamou mas percebi que era de não ter ainda feito o download da relação).
Eliminei um farmyard à volta de uma igreja; não faz sentido pois uma igreja/capela não é o que se possa de chamar um edificio agricola :)
Luis
Ed_slv (2025-01-21 19:39:24+00:00): Obrigado.
Devo ter vista um edificio isolado com nome e classifiquei de "monte" ser ler o nome do dito ;-)
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:03:05+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801231
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-21 17:41:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1862744111
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175711412

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:03:00+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801229
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-21 18:12:00+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12521028009

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
gion274 (2025-02-03 16:47:51+00:00): Ciao rikmede, ho fatto questo percorso 10 giorni prima della tua modifica, non c'erano cartelli CAI che indicavano la strada come percorso, ce n'erano per il sentiero. Non si dovrebbe mappare quello che si trova sul campo? Dove posso trovare anch'io il gpx con l'ufficialità del nuovo andamento? Grazie Gianni
rikmede (2025-02-03 17:50:12+00:00): Ciao Gianni, il gpx e i dati per compilare i campi del db me li ha forniti la Struttura Operativa Sentieri Veneto. Probabilmente visto quello scritto nel campo note, la sezione di Agordo ha deciso di modificare il sentiero, ma non ha ancora modificato i segnavia sul campo. Io non ho modo di fare le verifiche sul campo, ricevo i dati dalla SOSVE e sistemo su OSM per il catasto cai dei sentieri.
gion274 (2025-02-04 10:50:13+00:00): Ciao rickmede ti ringrazio per la risposta, penso piuttosto che il catasto CAI andrebbe aggiornato sul Geoportale Dati Territoriali Regione Veneto, su infomont o nelle sezioni CAI di competenza, con dati non modificabili da qualsiasi mappatore. Aggiornare l'andamento dei sentieri su OSM senza che questi trovino riscontro nella segnaletica in loco non ha senso perchè questa condizione prevarrà sempre su qualsiasi altra.
In confidenza continuo a sognare il giorno dove anche il Veneto abbia un sito di riferimento paragonabile ai confinanti SAT o CAI-FVG
Cordialmente Gianni
rikmede (2025-02-05 15:52:36+00:00): Il catasto sentieri del CAI è quello presente su INFOMONT (https://15.app.webmapp.it/map). Su OSM vengono aggiornati i sentieri (le relazioni nello specifico) che poi vengono "caricati" su INFOMONT mediante una procedura di validazione. Su INFOMONT i dati sono cristallizati alla data di validazione, se vengono fatte delle modifiche in OSM il sentiero su INFOMONT non viene modificato automaticamente. I sentieri su INFOMONT vengono modificati solo da referenti del CAI centrale o delle sezioni.
Pawe1909 (2025-03-27 12:49:27+00:00): Wäre für die Gerhard-Kindler-Straße "highway:residential" nicht zutreffender?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:02:53+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801226
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:02:47+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801224
typist_podiums (2025-01-21 19:27:45+00:00): #amap
typist_podiums (2025-01-21 19:28:32+00:00): @deepikja
citrula (2025-01-21 20:09:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your contribution. Not every feature needs a name, and in general you should not put descriptive names (like "Single Family Home"). I have fixed that for you. Happy mapping!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:02:41+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801223
Filip009 (2025-01-25 08:11:07+00:00): Zdravím, z akého dôvodu sú dané úseky neprejazdné? Je tam cesta zahladená a zničená bez stopy?
juraj2 (2025-01-25 11:23:42+00:00): Sú tam násypy aby to bolo nepriechodné keďže sú už tam stavebne pozemky, keby fungoval kataster dalo by sa to lepšie vidieť. Odstránil som aj zvyšok tej poľnej cesty lebo ako som to bolo pozrieť už ani tá nieje.
Filip009 (2025-01-25 23:58:07+00:00): Okej, vďaka za info. Inak kým nevyjde nová Ortofotomozaika odporúčam označovať ako disused:highway a čiaru ponechať, aby to niekto náhodou nepridal naspäť. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
SomeoneElse (2025-01-24 12:15:47+00:00): Hello,
It looks like after this edit https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12488720 has a gap in it.  Previously it was https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1XEG .  I wonder if something was deleted here?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2025-01-24 12:18:04+00:00): Similarly also https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12488357 , which is the other side of the boundary.
SomeoneElse (2025-01-24 12:19:37+00:00): Also was it planned to delete https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5469858/history , which was Ballintemple townland?
ViriatoLusitano (2025-01-24 16:18:57+00:00): Hello Andy,

Once more I appreciate finding these issues for me. I will fix them now.
ViriatoLusitano (2025-01-24 18:54:14+00:00): The Ballintemple had an erroneous exclave that I removed.
VictorIE (2025-04-30 22:47:56+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12521136845

I'm not sure that townlands need to be double-mapped.

Note that this one is spelled "Spital-lands" https://www.logainm.ie/en/13749

"Spital" is short for "Hospital".
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:02:35+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801222
habi (2025-01-22 07:53:38+00:00): Ciao Sam1923

Die Adresse, die du hier auf das Schulgelände erfasst hast, ist schon auf dem Schulgebäude: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8065714
Deshalb habe ich das Gefühl, dass es wenig Sinn macht, die Adresse auf dem Umriss doppelt zu erfassen.

Gruss aus Bern,
habi
Sam1923 (2025-01-22 08:11:37+00:00): Danke habi aus Bern.

Das passt. 

Evt. hilfreicher Hinweis: im Bildungszentrum Wald hat es kein Hotel. Es hat eine Kantine, die öffentlich zugänglich ist.

Hotel also ziemlich sicher nicht.

Liebe Gruess
habi (2025-01-22 08:18:22+00:00): Der Link dazu führt zu https://www.bzwlyss.ch/de/hospitality/hotellerie/allgemein/allgemein.html, wo ziemlich deutlich ein Hotel erwähnt wird...
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:02:29+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801219
NeisReview (2025-03-29 21:23:00+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164227202
ChrissW-R1 (2025-01-27 19:56:53+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/4604295
rhhs (2025-01-27 20:05:02+00:00): Sorry, my mistake, now corrected
ChrissW-R1 (2025-01-28 20:42:43+00:00): Thanks for your fast response and fix.
ZeLonewolf (2025-01-21 19:38:03+00:00): This topic is being discussed here, please join the discussion before editing this node:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico
Glassman (2025-01-21 19:45:57+00:00): reverted. as suggested please discusson on https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico
before making a name change to the gulf
Langlaeufer (2025-01-21 19:21:36+00:00): nee, das war der nicht separat eingezeichnete Fußgängerüberweg
Siegmarer (2025-03-04 19:32:27+00:00): Hallo, warum wurde die liegenden somit stillgelegten Gleise im Bahnhof Lugau (heute Stadtpark) als abgebaut umgetagt?
cyankahly (2025-03-07 19:07:12+00:00): Hi, 
du hast Recht. Ich habe mir das heute vor Ort noch einmal angeschaut, die Gleise liegen noch, Daten sind korrigiert.
Siegmarer (2025-03-08 12:20:21+00:00): Dankeschön für die Rückmeldung, es wäre schön gewesen, auch die alten Gleise in der Karte zu belassen, ich habe diese wieder mit razed/abandoned nachgetragen. Weißt du, wie weit das Gleis vom Abzweig Neuoelsnitz in Richtung Lugau noch liegt und wie die Absicherung dort erfolgt?