piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
map per (2024-08-13 10:10:34+00:00): Hallo duh299,

ist der Weg wirklich eine Fußgängerzone? Auf Straßenfotos von July 2023 ist der Weg als gemeinsamer Geh- und Radweg beschildert.

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
map per (2024-08-26 08:27:10+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur!
Supaplex030 (2024-04-18 19:18:38+00:00): Hallo kiwilecker,
danke für deine Beiträge zu OSM!
Beim durchsehen der letzten Änderungen hier in der Region ist mir deine Frage im Changeset-Kommentar aufgefallen, ob du Gleissegmente aufsplitten solltest, sodass wirklich nur die Segmente in der Relation landen, die auch wirklich befahren werden.
Hier lautet die Antwort auf jeden Fall "ja". Teile die Segmente gern an Weichen oder am Ende der Strecke auf, damit die Relation genau den Streckenverlauf wiedergibt.

Ich bin zwar kein "Bahn-Mapper" und kann dir daher auch zum Rest deiner Änderungen keine Rückmeldung geben, aber auf diese Weise werden Relationen auch in anderen Bereichen gehandhabt (ÖPNV, Radrouten etc.).

Falls du sie noch nicht kennst, hier noch zwei Tools, mit denen man Änderungen gut visualisieren kann – damit siehst du z.B., dass du an ein paar Stellen kurze Wegsegmente "vergessen" hast mit aufzunehmen. Das passiert übrigens auch erfahrenen Mappern immer mal wieder :) Vielleicht hast du ja Lust, dir das nochmal anzusehen.

https://osmcha.org/changesets/150176401/?aoi=d2922c96-6817-4108-9f2d-d426dfedb93b

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=150176401&relations=true

Soweit erstmal beste Grüße
Alex
kiwilecker (2024-04-20 17:00:28+00:00): Hallo Alex, ganz vielen Dank für die liebe Rückmeldung und die Infos! Ich schau mir das dann noch mal genauer an :)
Liebe Grüße, kiwilecker
bxl-forever (2024-05-14 14:58:59+00:00): Hello,

I came across your latest edits and I must warn you of a serious issue here.

You have massively erased the "building" tags on buildings.  As a consequence, they are no longer identified as buildings.  Look at the map in this street, it has a whole bunch of empty spots now, because they are no longer rendered. :-(

Also, it looks like you inadvertently erased good addresses by inadvertently adding shops with another address.

Take this example
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366838623/history

Read the history page from the bottom.  In version #1 the addresses for this building were 4, 4A and 4B, because this building apparently has 3 addresses.
You created version #2 and you changed the building into being solely housenumber 4… hence numbers 4A and 4B are now totally missing on the map.

If you want to add hairdressers or shops, please do not redraw buildings.  Do not touch them at all.  You can simply add a node somewhere inside an existing building, and add the name and opening hours of that place and that will be enough.

It will be appreciated if you would be so kind as to restore the buildings you erased, prior to making subsequenc changes to the map.

Thanks in advance.
silversurfer83 (2024-04-18 15:22:16+00:00): Gude :)

nächster kleiner Hinweis: Du hast die Abbiegespur jetzt schon vor der Brücke als eigene Linie geführt. Das machen wir eigentlich nicht so. So lange keine echte bauliche Trennung vorliegt werden Straßen bei OSM als eine Linie (way) gezeichnet. Die Details sind dann in den Tags. So kann Abschnittweise angegeben werden wie viele Spuren in welche Richtung führen und was der Zwecke der Spuren ist. Eine einfache durchgezogene weiße Linie ist dabei noch keine bauliche Trennung.
Im Forum und an anderen Stellen wird jedoch diskutiert, ob größere weiß schraffierte Flächen schon eine Trennung in mehrere Linien ermöglicht. Ist hier aber nicht der Fall. Daher meine Bitte: nicht mehr machen :)

Unabhängig davon: Der Rest sieht wieder ganz schick aus

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150177612
95927717 (2024-04-19 05:13:15+00:00): Jo, änder ich wieder bei Gelegenheit.
Grüße
Taya_S (2024-04-18 16:02:14+00:00): Reverted. Please do not replace road segments with your SEO spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150183289
Alan (2024-04-18 20:45:04+00:00): 👏
matheusgomesms (2024-06-15 18:37:47+00:00): Hi Stadia,

You are confusing stadiums. This is NOT Fonte Nova.
Emilius123 (2024-08-12 22:04:31+00:00): Hey, 

Willkommen im Leinigerland! Danke für das Nutzen von StreetComplete! :)
JHL009 (2024-04-18 15:22:49+00:00): Please disregard this edit. We need to confirm the correct size for our yard map.
rskedgell (2024-04-19 06:47:56+00:00): Once you have the correct dimensions,  it might be better mapped as building=roof + layer=1 + man_made=canopy (it doesn't really need the name tag, but you could put that in the description tag). If you're interested in the 3D representation, you could also add a height tag (height in metres).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Droof

If you'd like any help with this, please feel free to ask.
amcclements (2024-04-18 14:58:30+00:00): Thanks.
ivanbranco (2024-04-21 22:30:43+00:00): Ciao, per favore non re-inserire i nomi alle colonnine, vedi: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2022-October/074476.html

Utilizza network:website=	https://www.repower.com/it/dina/ invece di website=	https://www.repower.com/it/dina/

website=* va utilizzato solo per siti web riguardanti il preciso elemento, in questo caso questa precisa colonnina.
trial (2024-06-03 19:03:45+00:00): Bonjour, bienvenu(e) dans OpenStreetMap
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11828582388 : les valeurs doivent être en anglais britannique, donc la couleur c'est green. Et une poubelle de ville ne reçoit pas "tout" mais uniquement les petits déchets, comme c'est standard pour les poubelles de ce type, on ne met pas.
puma515 (2024-04-18 20:53:52+00:00): Moin du hast hier gestern schon ein Defibrilator erfasst. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11824604170
Sind da tatsächlich 2 vorhanden oder ist einer nun zuviel erfasst ?

schön gruß puma515
puma515 (2024-05-08 23:35:53+00:00): war vor ort da ist nur einer habe nun den zuviel erfassten gelöscht
Leo Slager (2024-04-18 16:43:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
DaveF (2024-04-19 09:49:09+00:00): Hi
Are you sure the gauge is 1520?
That's wider than standard.
Paul Berry (2024-04-19 12:30:10+00:00): Quite right. It's 5" gauge which is 127 mm. Now updated. Thank you.
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-19 04:31:40+00:00): Do not partially overlap areas.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150180578
JHL009 (2024-04-18 15:22:20+00:00): Please disregard this edit. We need to confirm the correct size for our yard map.
marczoutendijk_repair (2024-04-19 20:39:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150240047 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
okadatsuneo (2024-04-19 12:58:53+00:00): kr_ryoumaさん、初めまして。
OSMにようこそ。
building=*で描く建物は、何軒かをまとめて囲むのではなく、1軒ずつ建物の輪郭を描くようにしてください。
また、矩形の建物は、書いた後にショートカットで「q」のキーを押すと90度きっちりにしてくれるので、見た目がきれいになります。
以上、よろしくお願いします。
gscholz (2024-04-26 06:16:29+00:00): Hi  MashHad-Rizan,
this changeset has left behind quite a mess of self intersecting and overlapping lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=49.89303&lat=37.08331&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=150181908

Btw. what is the source for this ways, Bing does not show it?

Can you plese fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Road–Runner (2024-04-23 22:26:31+00:00): Warum hast du hier eine Ferienwohnung eingetragen? Hier gibt es keine Ferienwohnung.
5m4u9 (2024-04-19 09:03:51+00:00): Hola, gracias por las ediciones en el lugar y correcciones de nombres y del estado de la presa.

Sobre el nombre del río es mejor quitar quebrada porque ya sabemos que es un río.

algunos detalles en la presa las establecí como atributos de la misma presa.

Sobre el nombre es Quimsa o Quinsa?
Arnaud Champollion (2024-04-18 18:38:42+00:00): Chouette un nouveau parcours de santé ?
Sais-tu quand il sera équipé ? Ce pourrait être l'occasion de s'y rendre avec le groupe Openstreetmap Digne :) pour le compléter.
VLD170 (2024-04-18 19:10:41+00:00): Hello Austinenoni, 

Welcome to OSM! I noticed that you are putting highway=residential on areas that already have landuse tags. 

For example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/733042314 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/733042319 

The highway=residential and surface=ground are tags for road ways. Please remove them  as this is not how they are intended to be used. You may want to check out these pages from the wiki that show the difference in these tags https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=residential  and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dresidential

Best regards,  
VLD170
VLD170 (2024-04-18 19:12:03+00:00): Sorry I meant surface=unpaved.
Lumikeiju (2024-04-18 19:01:19+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OpenStreetMap :D

Thanks for your contribution!
literan (2024-04-18 17:46:03+00:00): неверно добавлен адрес, кривой формат. Ознакомьтесь:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-06 11:25:07+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3039517963/history has shop = outlet that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=outlet ? Is it outlet for home electronics like fridges? For clothes? For cars? For something else?
bxl-forever (2024-04-18 18:50:41+00:00): Hello,
If you want to add amenities, health practicioners, shops… please create a separate node.  Do not steal existing address nodes, this is not how we map in Belgium.
We fixed your edit.
Thanks.
zettaw (2024-04-19 11:31:01+00:00): Hey,
Thank you for fixing my edit.
I will do next time.
mavl (2024-11-13 07:58:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159079753 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-11 15:30:33+00:00): Hi KayleeS, welcome to OSM.

May we know the source of your data import?

Thanks.
KayleeS (2024-06-12 14:26:19+00:00): Thank you.

2013 Aerial Photography:

GSD			                       7cm 
Image Source                             Zeiss DMCII 230

Aerial Photography Date                  May 09, 2013
Aerial Photography Type  	           RGBN
Aerial Photography Roll No.              G1305001
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-12 18:14:40+00:00): Thank you for you reply.

Any copyright information?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-18 17:30:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149008019
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1201173215

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MKnight (2024-04-18 20:22:20+00:00): Moin, willkommen bei OSM.
Verschiedene Sachen; der Weg war vor Deiner Löschung als privat markiert, also korrekt "nicht öffentlich".
Ich habe Deine Löschung rückgängig gemacht.
2.: Das ist sicherlich auch nicht "Dein Grundstück", da der Weg mehrere Grundstücke überquert.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-02-16 05:27:15+00:00): DWG revert for incorrect removal of buildings

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162558740
mf8s003j (2024-05-07 18:56:16+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Is the slip lane from northbound St Mary's Road onto eastbound Dakota Street really gone? I know that the City has been redoing that intersection recently, but I'm always surprised when the City agrees to remove a slip lane. 

If it is truly gone, there's also a turn restriction at the intersection itself (relation 6966074) that should be removed, and I suppose that the crosswalk across the former slip lane should also be cleaned up.

I see that you're new to editing OpenStreetMap! Again, welcome. I'm happy to show you how to make those additional changes, or just make the changes myself once I go see them in person, if that's easier for you.
bmiller_wpg (2024-05-07 20:15:45+00:00): Yes. The lane was removed as part of construction last summer/fall. Transit stop was moved closer to intersection. Right turn from NB St. Mary's to SB Dakota is no longer allowed.
mf8s003j (2024-05-07 20:41:45+00:00): Oh, awesome. Thank you! I'm quite embarrassed now with the assumptions I made! Thanks for updating the map and for responding!
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-19 04:02:30+00:00): Do not falsely change river areas to a golf water feature.  This changeset has been reverted in part or full.
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-19 04:18:43+00:00): Do not try to incorrectly map parking lots as buildings.  changeset reverted in part or full.
BCNorwich (2024-04-18 19:13:31+00:00): Fiction removed.
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-19 04:15:57+00:00): When adding buildings and other features with 90 degree corners, press "Q" when it is selected to square the corners.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150187709
Tomas Straupis (2024-04-19 05:34:44+00:00): Čia toks dalykas su tais adresais „ant namo“, kaip ir pagal OSM principą „on the ground“, bet mes senamiestyje buvom gi radę ant namo parašytą neegzistuojantį adresą (berods buvau rašęs į talk-lt). Kitas dalykas, kad suvedus va kaip šituo atveju dublį, tai neina daryti automatinio adresų atnaujinimo, nes VMS db yra vienas 62 adresas (piečiau) ir šitą 62ą iš karto rodys kaip „ne(be)egzistuojantis“.
Konkrečiai šituo atveju pridėsiu addr:contact=yes.
alga (2024-04-19 06:01:13+00:00): You da man!
flohoff (2024-04-19 10:14:33+00:00): Good catch - Was hab ich denn da veranstaltet - vermutlich sind da irgendwo linien verklebt und mal die falsche erwischt 

Danke

Flo
mavl (2024-04-18 18:28:59+00:00): Здравствуйте. Можно узнать, зачем вы здание удалили на его место добавили новое?
HellMap (2024-08-31 10:02:27+00:00): Šajā izmaiņā daži celiņi nomainīti uz veloceļiem ap
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184330044 un https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/870784750 . Bet šeit nav jaunu veloceļu zīmju, tādēļ šie posmi joprojām nav veloceļi.

Vairāk info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines#Veloce%C4%BCi_un_veloinfrastrukt%C5%ABra
ika-chan! (2024-06-04 12:11:53+00:00): According to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11828956573/history, this changeset added a fictional toll gantry.
rskedgell (2024-04-19 06:01:05+00:00): This is already mapped as Firework Ait, which appears to have a well attested name. What is your source for the name "Monkey Island"?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23678804
DorneyLake123 (2024-08-17 15:15:52+00:00): Monkey Island is upriver in Bray

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23679577

I'm also suspicious of this park node in Dedworth, which seems to describe an adjacent road rather than a park

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11819999712
szalona_entropia (2024-04-19 05:51:04+00:00): Przedyskutowana na wysokim szczeblu: https://www.tomaszow-tit.pl/w-biezacym-numerze/ludzie/11973-jest-porozumienie-zmienia-przebieg-krajowki
woodpeck (2024-04-18 22:10:02+00:00): Dear mikel30, please provide better changeset comments that describe your edits. "added" is not a sufficient, especially for such changesets that include the removal of Russian names or the changing of Wikipedia links.
mikel30 (2024-04-18 22:25:58+00:00): ok, but I want to notice that wiki links were 404 there were not such wiki pages at all, I dont understand why they were put there at all, seems like need to ask previous author,
asturksever (2024-04-25 17:38:31+00:00): Hi charles chilufya,

Thank you so much for helping us to map buildings as part of https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/16415

These buildings are separated in real world, you can see it from changing roof colors or shape. I'd appreciate if you can map them separately .
charles chilufya (2024-04-25 19:27:54+00:00): Really Appreciate for this. Someone said i should not separate them.
noted Said.
asturksever (2024-04-26 12:23:58+00:00): I'm sorry for the misunderstanding, thanks Charles for mapping with us. Appreciated!
toyotagps (2024-04-22 06:25:39+00:00): Здравствуйте. А с каких пор вот этот участок Красномосковской соединяется со Cвободным? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104483594#map=19/56.02384/92.82071 Вы вообще видели это место в живую?
osmviborg (2024-04-18 18:48:25+00:00): Please use SDFI Aerial in DK.
VLD157 (2024-04-18 21:45:26+00:00): Thank you very much for the suggestion!
infeeeee (2024-04-19 07:53:01+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Kitöröltél, és újrarajzoltál egy elemet a  jó helyen. Lehetőleg az ilyen törlés/újrarajzolásokat kerülni kell,  inkább a meglévő elemet módosítsd! Törléskor elveszik az elem története,  és az hasznos információkat is tartalmazhat: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Javítom ezt, kérlek figyelj erre a továbbiakban.

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
maraf24 (2024-04-20 11:29:17+00:00): Nie jest to prawidłowe mapowanie 3D, gdyż obwódka wokół ronda nie jest budynkiem ani dachem.
pavvv (2025-04-14 14:28:54+00:00): A więc czym jest? Jak byś ją otagował?
maraf24 (2025-04-15 16:56:18+00:00): Lepiej poszukaj na wiki lub zapytaj się na forum, bo pewnie tagowania na to jeszcze nie ma.
michael60634 (2024-05-01 01:41:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in full as it is vandalism.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150189716
Noman Bin Hossain (2024-05-08 19:23:18+00:00): sorry
Leo Slager (2024-04-18 22:06:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
clay_c (2024-06-26 14:35:23+00:00): Hi mrhercli89,

I see that several independent municipalities and charter townships have been changed to place=suburb in this changeset. This doesn't appear to match the OpenStreetMap definition of "suburb", which is a section of a city, akin to what we might call a district, ward, or borough in North American English. Suburbs elsewhere in North America are not tagged like this. This is affecting renderers like OpenStreetMap Americana, where places like Livonia, Dearborn and Hamtramck are missing from the map entirely [1].

The previous place tagging was appropriate. Could you please revert these changes?

[1] https://zelonewolf.github.io/openstreetmap-americana/#map=10.02/42.3649/-83.1532
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-28 14:22:09+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11829053477/history has building = 1918 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
Wild Spike (2025-11-28 21:53:07+00:00): The campus map:

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/65ea2f0aaa42e95aecc72580/t/6782e85628cce4144c8de61d/1736632417710/2024+Maps+Combined.pdf
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-29 09:48:53+00:00): 1) not sure can we copy from that map

2) what 1918 means on that map?
spencerledger (2024-04-19 18:04:05+00:00): Apologies about this, my friend did this as a joke, I was going to remove it myself but I saw you remove it.
opendcc (2024-06-21 03:03:57+00:00): Hello,

please take a look at https://www.mcdonalds-kinderhilfe.org/vogtareuth/unser-haus/ - and consider your tagging.

best regards
MxxCon (2024-04-20 02:44:34+00:00): Hello.
If this place's cuisine is coffee, wouldn't it be better if it was tagged as a cafe rather than a restaurant?
Also, phone number format needs to be corrected. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150191418
MxxCon (2024-04-20 02:45:13+00:00): Ah, nevermind😅I see that in the following edit you made exactly that change.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150191418
DBale (2024-04-20 11:38:20+00:00): Thank you for checking!
theDM (2024-04-19 21:24:47+00:00): Racja. Jeszcze poprawiłem przebieg relacji ZDW, bo w ZDW się dowiedziałem, że została ona skrócona do tego przejazdu kolejowego.
tekim (2024-04-18 19:52:27+00:00): Great to see action being taken in cases of data being copied from Google Maps!
miluethi (2024-04-19 02:24:15+00:00): Abi, please square out all building shapes whenever possible by selecting the building shape and the "Q" key.
Also don't use names like "edificio" or building. Thanks.
TrickyFoxy (2024-04-20 23:12:17+00:00): 👋 You added 50=40.  It seems you tried to indicate maxspeed, but you made a mistake.  What speed did you mean?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431218423
VlIvYur (2025-01-31 22:22:17+00:00): Hello
In Panik are those sidewalk really sidewalks, not shoulders?
It seems like there is no any sidewalk and people just walk by the road. Also there are no signs of any crossings on the space imagery, especially so many outside of the highway through the village, which is even not paved
matheusgomesms-import (2024-04-28 20:27:57+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/Standard_Dashes
VLD549 (2024-04-28 08:41:07+00:00): Hi, could you indicate why Kanaaldijk-Zuid has to be written with a hyphen according to you and your colleague? BAG uses it without hyphen.

Thank you!
Marcel-NL (2024-04-28 12:20:44+00:00): I spelled it with hyphen according to the street name sign. See: https://ibb.co/2cC5wTg . But indeed BAG spells it without hyphen, so I added that hyphen-less name as official name.
archie (2024-04-19 01:32:25+00:00): Du har vid åtskilliga tillfällen gång på gång taggat vägarna i det området som ligger dig om hjärtat med oneway=no. Jag har raderat och reverterat detta lika många gånger. Vi kan inte fortsätta med detta.
Som jag ser det - och jag har angivit detta som skäl i kommentaren till cs - så finns inget som helst stöd för att just "dina" vägar skall erhålla ovan angivna tagg. Jag känner till dessa gator och vet om att de är trånga, men denna omständighet medför inte att oneway=no skall åsättas gatorna. För att ange att gatorna är trånga står andra taggar till förfogande t ex width-taggen.
Dessa gator är INTE skyltade som enkelriktade! Vespor/motorcyklar kan t ex  passera motorfordon. 
Det rör sig med andra ord om ett missbruk av taggen oneway=no i det här fallet.
oneway=no kan användas, enl osm-wiki, på vägar, där en sträcka på en väg är enkelriktad och påföljande sträckan inte är enkelriktad. Detta är typiskt sett fallet vid motorvägspå-/avfarter. Men kan förekomma även på andra ställen t ex här på Lilla Bergsgatan (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9862323 samt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241372514).
Utdrag ur osm-wiki: "oneway=no is used to confirm that (a part of) a street is not a oneway street. (Use only in order to avoid mapping errors in areas where e.g. oneway streets are common, or to override defaults.)"
Observera att här avses med oneway (enkelriktad) ett legalt påbud, inte en subjektivt upplevt förnimmelse.
BPTT (2024-04-18 20:07:37+00:00): Changeset comment ran out of charactes. The same applies for the separated cycle path that was drawn on W 38th St. In places where SC Blvd crosses major roads and cycle paths are fully separated and protected by concrete curbs, I kept those and attached them to the roadways. I made ever effort to tag roadways as cycleway=separate where necessary but could have missed some. This was a big edit in OSM ID that got stuck in an endless Checking for Conflicts, so I downloaded the changes.osc file and used JOSM to push the update (my first time using JOSM). So I hope this worked correctly.
citrula (2024-04-19 05:46:11+00:00): Please don't use descriptive names for features - unless there's a sign that actually says "Woodland Hills Tennis Court", it probably shouldn't go in the name tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150192648