piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Raenbow (2023-07-06 00:44:02+00:00): Thanks GOwin! I agree, using construction=minor with a conditional tag would be a good alternative if this road is passable. Is there any chance you or caspermonte are able to confirm the status or scope of this construction? I don’t see any signs of construction and I was hoping to verify the accuracy of the road connections here.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-14 13:19:15+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 2529686, 2529704, 2529746, 2529920, 2530047, 2530150.
user_5359 (2023-05-15 15:35:12+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/10895852360. What is the mean of the tag "name arberesh" = "Kroi Casalliqit". Please notice we use ISO 639-x code
rodolfovargas (2023-05-16 00:43:44+00:00): Hola.
En el TAG "operator" corresponde colocar el nombre de la institución que administra la colmena. Supongo que es Senda Verde (confirmar y cambiar)
En "species:en" corresponde la ESPECIE de abeja, segun taxonomía. Lo que se escribio "Stingless native bee", "Abeja nativa sin aguijon" corresponde a un nombre común, que en realidad serían las Abejas Meliponas (se puede colocar como "name". Si no se tiene el dato de ESPECIE, no colocar nada. 
El LINK de "image", si esta tomado con StreetComplete, lamentablemente se perderá. Conviene además tomar fotos con Mapillary.

Saludos.
mueschel (2023-05-16 07:38:07+00:00): Hi,
all these tags were added by maramirez13, I just fixed the really wrong keys.
rodolfovargas (2023-05-16 11:40:24+00:00): Good. Thanks so much :)
Warin61 (2023-05-15 02:39:16+00:00): Opps 
This changed the North Scottsdale Regional Reserve relation... Looks like the northern section of the Great Forester River is used by the reserve boundary...
tastrax (2023-05-15 06:04:11+00:00): Ooops - hopefully its fixed now
bxl-forever (2023-05-14 13:31:49+00:00): Hello,

You edited the map in Rennes (France)… but you also made changes to a building in Sonneberg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/102867649) and one in Bad Harzburg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/255969788).

The problem is that you uploaded all those changes at once.

Please do not that.  It makes your changeset painfully hard to review, because it creates a huge bounding box covering a large part of Western Europe, unnecessarily alerting local mappers in all the places in between.

Next time, please upload your changes separately.  (Some documentation here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets)

Have a nice day.
silversurfer83 (2023-05-15 18:48:54+00:00): Hello Karl Maps,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap :)

I'd like to add a few things to my predecessor's words since you asked for review of your changes.
As bxl-forever mentioned, it's really hard to review a changeset covering half a continent because the usual tools won't load it properly. But that has already been mentioned.

Then: You said you cleanded Rennes but you never mentioned on what basis. We can only guess. So in the future please give a good source for your actions. Either within the comment or using the "source" section before uploading.

You deleted a few things. Why?

Even though you're pretty new I'd like to mention the concept of lifecycle prefixes since they cover quite a range of cases that make deletion of an object unneccesary: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Maybe you can elaborate on the reasons for your changes. Until then I leave you with some helpful articles of the OSM wiki.

Happy Mapping
silversurfer83

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
Karl Maps (2023-05-21 13:11:11+00:00): Hi,

Sorry for the big box, learning to contribute correctly.

I live there so I updated some stuff, will try to include more sources.

Thanks for the documentation :)
Julbus (2023-06-04 13:32:11+00:00): Merci de bien vouloir faire revenir vos modifs en arrière sur le dépôt car ce n'est pas une garage de réparation automobile.
Cordialemment
mapperue (2024-03-06 07:19:00+00:00): Hi, what does it mean tag content=q at this object?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1172700938
Loshu (2024-03-06 08:34:20+00:00): I don't know why a put "q" - i think it was an old overgrown pile of grass clippings but have removed it until next time i pass it to confirm.
jxpsert (2023-05-26 06:49:22+00:00): Hi there craghead,
I replied to another changeset of yours just now. Same applies here. indoor=no?
craghead (2023-05-26 21:00:50+00:00): Hi jxpsert,
Many thanks for pointing there anomalies out! Must have had a whiff of something strange. Amended the tags. The UK one was actually a duplication that I did not spot was already loaded.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-31 14:51:15+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5858588845/history has shop = textiles that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=textiles ? Is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=fabric describing this shop well? Is it intentional that shop=textiles, was used not shop=fabric? How it differs from it?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-06-04 10:08:55+00:00): heh, selfquestioning again
wambacher (2023-05-20 08:06:28+00:00): Moin, ist ja nett von dir, diesen Node zu korrigieren. Aber dieser Node liegt in Dillenburg und das Cafe ist in Hofheim am Taunus ;)

https://wambachers-osm.website/data/Rathauscafe.png

Hab ihn als "Dublette" gelöscht.
rab (2023-05-21 11:20:18+00:00): Hallo,
habe den Node mit den Version 1 tags zurück geholt
wambacher (2023-05-21 12:34:38+00:00): Danke, hatte das für einen "Irrläufer" gehalten. Da es das Cafe aber offensichtlich gibt, hab ich es mal an die richtige Stelle verschoben.
wakosoft (2023-05-21 18:52:01+00:00): Hi,
habe mich anscheinend vertan.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-02 13:34:01+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10895948730/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
mcliquid (2025-07-02 17:26:22+00:00): Interesting, Every Door must have set it up that way automatically back then; at least, it wasn't intentional on my part. Here is a “stamp spot.” This is common in hiking areas; it's usually a small wooden box with a stamp pad for signing your hiking logbook.
When I look it up on the wiki, I come here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:checkpoint

I will update it!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-02 17:31:57+00:00): https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/880 was at least partially fixed since then, but https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=fixme still grows steadily whenever I have less time to make such changeset comments
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-02 17:37:26+00:00): and thanks for a fix and a quick response!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-14 13:19:17+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 2529686, 2529704, 2529746, 2529920, 2530047, 2530150.
Larmax (2023-05-14 13:58:03+00:00): Moi, viiva peräisin on pieleen menneen metsäimportin pieleen menneestä poistosta, jonka joku on tulkinnut poluksi.
silversurfer83 (2023-05-15 18:54:56+00:00): Hello Jan
I don't know if you meant to edit the database that feeds maps.me (a database used by millions of people every day) or if you just tried to save some of your personal bookmarks in the app.
Either way: please be aware that you're adding to a live database if you really meant to upload the data.

safe travels
silversurfer83
eggie (2023-05-17 08:11:03+00:00): 
This part of the contribution  has been reverted by a fellow mapper. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287870041#map=19/52.02872/5.03666
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2023-05-17 08:12:49+00:00): The other contributions are reverted as well.
captain_slow (2023-09-11 08:44:43+00:00): Hallo gosausee
Was hat es mit dem Friedhof auf sich den du hier eingetragen hast? Der ist nicht auf den Luftaufnahmen zu sehen und auch nicht vor Ort (aktuell ist dort eine Baugrube, siehe dazu auch das Foto in folgender Note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3882659)

Grüsse
captain_slow
user_5359 (2023-05-15 15:36:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the mean of the tag "music sytem" = "tractor music system"?
user_5359 (2023-05-15 16:02:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the mean of the tags 
gauravk5 = pind
patiala = allowal
?
Ahmad-0772 (2023-08-01 22:51:28+00:00): Hello salma_z

Could you please use the new satellite image to fix the roundabout shape and open it to traffic. According to GPS data the roundabout is now open and the new satellite images also show that it is paved.

Regards, 
Ahmed
salma_z (2023-08-02 12:45:38+00:00): Hello Ahmad-0772;
Thank you for reaching out to me, I operational the roundabout and used the latest satellite image and I mentioned it in the changeset source.
Link for roundabout:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1172708989
Regards
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-14 13:19:13+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 2529686, 2529704, 2529746, 2529920, 2530047, 2530150.
Qitay (2023-05-14 17:48:34+00:00): Are you planning on importing some village names from proper sources after these are all removed? Also river/island/etc were not that bad probably, would consider keeping them for the time being.
Larmax (2023-05-14 14:02:01+00:00): Eihän se ollut sellaiseksi merkittykään: crossing=unmarked ja continuous_sidewalk=yes tarkoittivat sen olevan ylijatkettu jalkakäytävä. Tälläisista ylityspaikoista on käyty foorumilla keskustelua: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ylijatketun-jalkakaytavan-merkinta/97512/8
tesp (2023-05-14 14:41:25+00:00): Olihan siinä kuitenkin highway=crossing, eli merkitty suojatieksi. Jos tie ja jalkakäytävä kohtaa niin eikö siinä ole sitten riittävästi dataa?
Larmax (2023-05-14 15:06:08+00:00): highway=crossing ei tarkoita välttämättä suojatietä, vaan yleisesti ylityspaikkaa. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing%3Dunmarked Tämä on selkeästi tarkoitettu kadunylityspaikaksi ja ymmärtääkseni on myös ylijatkettu jalkakäytävä, johon liittyy omat sääntönsä
tesp (2023-05-18 16:04:07+00:00): highway=crossing on aina tarkoittanut suojatietä. Jos sillä merkittäisiin yleisesti ylityspaikkoja, niin pitäisi joka kohtaan, missä jalkakäytävä risteää tien kanssa laittaa highway=crossing jolloin tägi menettäisi merkityksensä.

Siihen on sitten jälkeenpäin keksitty crossing=uncontrolled ja crossing=traffic_signals merkitsemään onko suojatie valvottu
BCNorwich (2023-05-16 07:40:13+00:00): Hi, I've removed the huge area as it's not a townhall building.

Regards Bernard.
Wipflord (2023-05-15 12:44:34+00:00): name=* ist kein Beschreibungsfeld
user_5160062 (2023-05-15 12:47:35+00:00): Das ist der von der Stadt Bruchköbel erteilte offziziele Name dieses Friedhofsbereiches.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-16 06:39:29+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363044895/history has construction = construction that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What construction=construction means? What you wanted to express by using this tag?
maraf24 (2023-05-14 16:35:30+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dbakery
Reitstoen (2023-05-16 08:11:04+00:00): Er det ikke mer korrekt å bruke "compacted" på veien opp til Rønningen enn "fine_gravel"?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=fine%20gravel
vs.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dcompacted
HellMap (2023-05-14 20:05:37+00:00): Sveiki!

Vai https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1172714516 covered=yes vietā nebūs tunnel=building_passage? Mapillary šajā vietā tuvu nav, bet izskatās (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2942206882693810&focus=photo) pēc tipiska Padomju ēku caurejamā tuneļa. Tikai trepes/pakāpienus gan neesmu personīgi redzējis, tāpēc neesmu pārliecināts.
Ong3o (2023-05-14 22:27:10+00:00): Piekrītu par "building_passage" piemērotību. Nomainīju pret ierosināto (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136102813).

Par pašu objektu - tas gluži nav tipisks Padomju ēku tunelis. Vismaz tādus kā šis es neesmu redzejis, kur no 0./ielas līmeņa cauri mājai iet trepes+tunelis uz 1. stāva līmeni.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-05-14 21:48:19+00:00): Can you please fix Srinagar (North) and  Srinagar (South) relations?

Srinagar (North) (10389874, v11)
Srinagar (South) (10389875, v11)
Zeeshan Mushtaq (2023-05-15 08:12:22+00:00): Yes, I have fixed the relationship now. The whole map of Srinagar was a mess. Srinagar North and South are Sub-Tehsils of the Srinagar district. So  I fixed that. Please check for errors and let me know.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-05-15 09:12:39+00:00): Nice job. Thanks!!!
velomeloman (2023-05-15 18:16:45+00:00): Здравствуйте. Зачем Вы превратили терравей около Соловьиного и Рокотова в асфальт?
literan (2023-05-15 20:49:26+00:00): он не отвечает, видимо, не читает почту. Надо писать в DWG чтобы блокировали, тогда обычно просыпаются
velomeloman (2023-05-16 07:52:25+00:00): От Севастопольского к роднику и далее к Лысой горе тоже никакого асфальта ещё нет. Сегодня проверил.
Calibrator (2023-05-18 08:14:43+00:00): Я не знал, как называется покрытие из крошки и клея. Теперь знаю. Спасибо.
Calibrator (2023-05-18 08:25:36+00:00): А до новой дорожки "от Лысой горы до родника", похоже, вы так и не добрались. Там всё-таки асфальт проложили уже. Неправда ваша. Я специально ездил на велосипеде. Там даже не терравей, а настоящий асфальт.Проверите - напишите. Может мы о разных дорожках пишем?
velomeloman (2023-05-18 19:34:12+00:00): Дорожка от Севастопольского к роднику:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203656140, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385232259, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385232246,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203656157,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203779733.
Уложена подложка. Будет там асфальт или терравей пока не известно.

Дорожка от родника к щиту:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1080809076, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286903961. Никаких работ в этом году не велось. Старый гранитный отсев.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136086764
ad47 (2023-07-22 10:07:10+00:00): Мда, поналепили асфальтов, там где даже сейчас спустя 2 месяца лишь местами началиь какие-то работы...
toyotagps (2023-05-24 05:20:19+00:00): Здравствуйте. Скажите, что вы такое делаете, что после ваших правок прямые дороги становятся кривыми? Буквально 2 недели назад выровнял дороги в центре Красноярска после ваших предыдущих правок и опять кривые дороги.
FroschForscher (2026-01-24 13:06:32+00:00): Hallo shogun heißt das Handygeschäft hier "kein Name" oder hat es keinen Namen?
shogun (2026-01-24 13:16:56+00:00): Hallo, ehm das ist natürlich ein Fehler. Ich habe keinen Namen (richtigen Namen ) erkennen können.
SIehe Foto: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/15/Rochlitz_Markt_2_46402.JPG 
wollte ich bestimmt mal ändern. Darfst gern es löschen.
eggie (2023-05-14 14:39:16+00:00): Dag Deerhunter....  Bedankt voor je bijdrage.  Echter we gebruiken geen naamtag om iets te beschrijven. Bv name=bankje name=huis.. Dus ook geen name=parkeerplaats.
Ik pas even wat aan.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-14 14:45:32+00:00): naam, adresgegevens phone = verwijderd. De parking staat als parking_street_side op het vlak.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-14 15:10:37+00:00): De juiste tagging is dan
amenity=parking
parking=street_side
orientation=perpendicular
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-06-07 12:44:39+00:00): I fixed it already, but note that at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29974576/history you deleted main road tag

I wish you a happy mapping in future! (I also made mistakes in mapping that is normal, just try to be more careful and check other places where it is likely that you made a similar mistake)
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-05-14 18:31:02+00:00): 谢谢，不过最好使用工具去回退不然可能有遗漏的啦~（在 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136096611 中做完了）

（另外说一下，仅仅写一个“1”不能帮助其他人更好的了解这里发生了什么，可以具体一些哦，比如“还原了在XXX中被搞乱的机场跑道”酱）
Mister Kanister (2023-05-18 19:26:08+00:00): Hi OSOme, was hat es mit diesen "Greenspaces" auf sich? Ist das irgendwie eine hier geläufige Bezeichnung? Objekte in OpenStreetMap sollten nicht mit einem name-Tag versehen werden, nur um sie zu beschreiben (siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#Namen_sind_keine_Beschreibungen). Dass es sich um Grünflächen handelt, geht schon aus leisure=park hervor.

zB hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1172724925 oder hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1172724910

Allerdings bin ich der Meinung, dass es sich hier (mind. z.T.) nicht um Parks handelt, da Du u.a. auch private/halböffentliche Hinterhöfe erfasst hast.
johsin18 (2023-08-25 15:19:59+00:00): Irgendeine Rückmeldung von dem Mapper?  Ich schlage vor wir entfernen die Parks oder zumindest die seltsamen Namen.
Agi on tour (2023-08-27 16:15:29+00:00): Ich stimme johsin18 zu, insbesondere, weil 'Greenspace' kein anerkanntes Tagging ist.
OSOme hat in meiner Nachbarschaft mehrere Flächen so getaggt.
Im Prinzip hat er nicht unrecht: Das Geoportal weist den entsprechenden Flächen "Gartenanlage" zu. Bei offiziellen Parks vergibt das Geoportal die Bezeichnung "Parkanlage".

Die OSM-Definition im Wiki für leisure=park lautet "Open, green area for recreation, usually municipal." Insofern denke ich, dass man diesen Key so belassen kann.

Ich habe mir noch landuse=recreation_ground angeschaut, denke aber, dass leisure=park es doch besser trifft.

Wenn OSOme nicht reagiert hat, sollten wir die Änderung wohl vornehmen. 
Er ist bei OSM seit Feb. 23 und hat 8 Mapping days. Ausser einem alle Ende Feb und noch einen im Mai.
Die Mappings haben in Basel und in Polen stattgefunden.
johsin18 (2023-09-03 14:47:00+00:00): Ich habe die fragwürdigen Namen herausgenommen mit 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140761489
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140762198
Damit ist das für mich erstmal erledigt.
Benoît C MdP (2023-05-17 13:17:55+00:00): Bonjour

Je n'ai pas compris en quoi l'impasse Damesme est une zone de rencontre. Sauf erreur de ma part, il n'y a pas de signalisation qui l'indique sur place. Et ce n'est pas non plus indiqué dans l'arrêté.

Bonne continuation

Benoît
Vardyger (2023-05-18 11:48:34+00:00): Bonjour,

En effet je n'ai rien vu allant dans ce sens non plus, mais ma modification concernait la surface de la route, je l'ai effectué avec l'application StreetComplete qui rajoute peut-être des choses dans son processus.
N'hésitez pas a le corriger car je ne suis pas sûr de repasser par là bientôt.

Merci ! 

Vard
Benoît C MdP (2023-05-23 14:33:13+00:00): Bonjour Vard,
Oui exact au temps pour moi. Je n'avais pas vu dans l'historique qu'un autre contributeur était passé faire la modif une semaine avant ta contribution.

Bonne continuation

Benoît
Đuro Jiří (2026-02-21 17:55:48+00:00): bicycle=yes???
eggie (2023-05-14 16:18:38+00:00): Dag Deerhunter. Je bedoeling is natuurlijk goed, maar je bijdrage klopt niet gezien de tagging.
Een historic=monument is bv de TajMahal in India. Meestal een grafmonument.
Een informatiebord is tourism=information
information=board

Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dinformation

Het heeft niet een naam informatiebord.. Eigenlijk met als name=parkeerplaats

Wanneer het meer is dan een bord en er ook een herdenkingsplaats is dan historic=memorial gebruiken.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-14 16:24:45+00:00): Aangepast naar 
tourism=information
information=board
board:type=historic
Adres en naam verwijderd. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:board_type
eggie (2023-05-14 16:27:30+00:00): historic=memorial is al getagd door een andere mapper. Daar staat de naam op.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-14 16:34:58+00:00): Dag Stefan... 
Alle begin is moeilijk. 
De hoofdfunctie van het gebouw is niet stembureau... het pad kan geen layer=1 hebben . Dan loopt het ondergronds.
Het stukje onder de overkapping kun je taggen met covered=yes
De denomination is wel degelijk protestant
De operator= nederlandse_gereformeerde_kerken
Ik heb wat aangepast.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-14 16:37:14+00:00): Het voetpad dat je geplakt hebt op de oprit heb ik verwijderd. We noemen dat duplicated ways.  Dat werkt niet.
Het voetpad heb ik aangepast als onderdoorgang met covered=yes

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-14 17:40:10+00:00): Typo layer=-1 betekent onder het maaiveld.
osmviborg (2023-05-15 05:52:44+00:00): Hvorfor fjerner du objekter der rent faktisk findes?
SomeoneElse (2023-05-16 16:46:41+00:00): Clearly the change to e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353944525 is causing information to be lost here (not much information, but still something).
The correct tag here would be "shop=charity".
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-05-17 17:38:34+00:00): > The correct tag here would be "shop=charity".

Do you know this based on local knowledge or something else? I would be happy to replace it but I have no idea how this may be safely assumed here based on what I know.

> is causing information to be lost here (not much information, but still something). 

What kind of information is lost? That it is not a wholesaler?
SomeoneElse (2023-05-17 17:46:58+00:00): As I have said on the mailing list already, local knowledge.  Also, as I have also said on the mailing list, a quick overpass search finds lots of other similarly named shops tagged as "shop=charity" nearby.

I could forgive a completely new OSM contributor with making this kind of basic error, but am genuinely saddened that someone with your level of experience with OSM is making these kind of basic mistakes.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-05-17 18:05:20+00:00): Changing then to shop=charity

> As I have said on the mailing list already

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2023-May/088289.html ? Or also something else? I will respond to it - though not sure whether I will be able to do this today (but definitely before any bot edits)

But let me know if it is urgent to read/respond that message or some of not answered changeset comments
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-05-17 18:07:29+00:00): > a quick overpass search finds lots of other similarly named shops tagged as "shop=charity" nearby

I am not fan of NSI style blind replacements based on name match and I am not planning to do them

> this kind of basic error

What exactly is basic error here? If I would spot the same kind of data nearby me while editing I would do the same kind of edit manually (shop=retail to shop=yes)

Do you mean being unaware that it is shop=charity?
SomeoneElse (2023-05-17 18:35:59+00:00): Your basic errors were:

Performing an undocumented mechanical edit (the text at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/fixing_malformed_shop_tags does not cover this case).

Thinking that changing "rare tag I do not understand" into "common but meaningless tag" added any value.

Continuing with these ridiculous edits despite being told that they were damaging (and after you yourself had reverted previous examples after previous complaints!).

Not using any common sense when trying to work out what a sensible value might be. Did you ask anyone? No.  Did you investigate? No (a search locally for shops with the name Lighthouse will find a number of "Lighthouse Charity Shop" examples).

I can guarantee that a mention on IRC that you were going to change a shop in Nottingham with the name Lighthouse into a nondescriptive value would have got an immediate response.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-05-17 19:16:29+00:00): Why you think it is undocumented?

Have you seen comments in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136075427 ?

> Performing an undocumented mechanical edit (the text at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/fixing_malformed_shop_tags does not cover this case).

That is because it was removed in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Mechanical_Edits%2FMateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account%2Ffixing_malformed_shop_tags&type=revision&diff=2527714&oldid=2525269 to document that it will not be done again.

There is "Additionally https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136075427 resulted in stopping to change shop=fixme"

Also, shop=fixme was in https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2023-April/088185.html from thread linked on documentation page and in changeset comments here