piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
btwhite92 (2026-04-25 01:43:45+00:00): According to https://nsbfoundation.com/sb/pyramid-lake-road-route-445/, that name applies to NV 445 only between Sutcliffe & NV 446 junction. I was the one that removed it. I lived in this area for over a decade and am familiar with signage there. It sounds like there are many names used for this road, which is the case for many state/US highways, which is why I try to stick to what is signposted since it is ground-verifiable. If there is no posted or adjacently-addressed name that isn't derivable from the 'ref', I tag it with 'noname=yes' since there is no ground-verifiable name. Alternative names, local names, historic names, formal/government names, memorial names, etc belong in those respective tags. 

Again I think it would be fair to name this stretch "Pyramid Way" since all adjacent parcels are addressed as such.
btwhite92 (2026-04-25 01:52:16+00:00): Also, even in the above case about "Pyramid Lake Road", I would still probably put that as an 'alt_name' since it is the name of the scenic byway carried by the road, and not the road itself per-say. Example, a large stretch of US 395 through the Eastern Sierra is signed as the 'Eastern Sierra Scenic Byway', but that name would belong as an 'alt_name' and not 'name'.
literan (2026-04-26 09:22:20+00:00): тег railway:position е требует указания km
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:railway:position

исправлю
literan (2026-04-26 09:22:29+00:00): е=не
PizzaTreeIsland (2026-04-27 11:57:23+00:00): Hello hozpak, 
unfortunately, I had to revert your changes once again. Please take my advice from my recent changeset comment seriously. A good editor like iD is easy to use and helps you find errors before you upload. There is also a great community forum, a subreddit and a lively discord server where people will happily answer any questions you might have. 
Please do not add address data to roads. Roads don't have addresses. 
It would also help if you wrote better changeset comments so people could understand what you're trying to do and give you advice. You can read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications for more info on that. 

Thanks and happy mapping!
gurglypipe (2026-04-26 21:10:00+00:00): Heya, thanks for these improvements.

Are you sure that the gate https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13759714395 is meant to be on the cycle path? I don’t remember there being any gates on the path. Is it meant to be in a wall parallel to the path, or on the path but always open? Ta :)
Adze1 (2026-04-27 10:56:52+00:00): Oh, rats! When I did that, I made a mental note to check it later, but completely forgot. I've had problems in the past with (presumably by Everydoor) gates snapping to nearby paths/roads. I deliberately didn't do any of the other gates to the side of the path. This gate is in the boundary to the north/riverward side. I'll fix it.
gurglypipe (2026-04-27 11:16:17+00:00): Thanks! I thought it would be something like that; easily done. :)
TuAmigoElEditor (2026-04-24 23:24:33+00:00): Hola, porfavor deja de modificar erroneamente la clasificación de las vias de Chorrillos.
Alexis Zapata (2026-04-25 00:10:52+00:00): Bueno días esta modificación  no erróneamente son la continuación de una via principal de chorrillos , es la Avenida México
TuAmigoElEditor (2026-04-25 01:32:06+00:00): Esta via ya fue corregida hace 2 dias y la volviste a cambiar. Dejé un mensaje en tu inbox, porfavor leelo.
felipeeugenio (2026-04-26 13:28:21+00:00): Alexis, por favor unirse al chat de la comunidad peruana de OSM para discutir estos cambios. Las categorías de caminos son algo un poco más complejo de lo que parece y tienen relación con su función dentro de una red.

Viendo los cambios hechos en los últimos 4 días, hay varios que son, a todas luces, incorrectos.

Saludos
iandees (2026-04-24 23:36:50+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8321496821 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181787244, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2026-05-26 18:16:16+00:00): Name is to be used for street names. Do not use it just to display some label on the map. You can add it to description tag.
iandees (2026-04-24 23:36:55+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/297984051 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181787245, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
pootriarch (2026-04-25 00:59:14+00:00): i know that generally we don't delete things. but this is just an area (no address), and a misleading one: all transit service has been moved away. if we want a slab of concrete here i'm happy to draw it back, but a transit platform seemed like deceptive noise
iandees (2026-04-25 11:44:58+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11059216796 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181802549, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Herman Lee (2026-06-22 06:05:53+00:00): When you editing, please use the local language (formation) as the name tag, thanks. Else, I and other editors will revert or change it anyway.
Totor (2026-04-29 04:32:00+00:00): Hi CholoRommmm,
Great you are adding to the OSM map!
I believe this store should be a shop=convenience, not a variety_store.
A  variety_store seems to apply more to low cost / dollar stores, with only articles <100PHP (or some other small amount).
Totor (2026-04-29 04:35:02+00:00): Have a look at :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=variety%20store?uselang=en
and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dconvenience
For the difference between the two shop types.
Totor (2026-04-29 04:38:09+00:00): Hi CholoRommmm, 
Is this mainly a shop? or just a small restaurant on the streetside ?
The name seems to indicate this should be mapped as amenity=fastfood, or restaurant.
Have a look here for common Filipino POI tags:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions
tastrax (2026-04-28 10:10:45+00:00): Top tip - after creating a building its best to 'square' the corners. You do that by using the Q key after assigning the building type.
b-jazz (2026-04-26 16:11:50+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1503484887 et al

When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. If you could go back and clean up where you've made this mistake, that would be helpful. But more importantly, if you could stop from doing this in the future, it would be greatly appreciated. Please read the wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out.
stosh77 (2026-05-31 02:05:53+00:00): I have corrected the details.
democat (2026-04-25 08:36:17+00:00): Hey there, thanks for the changeset! Please make sure to resolve issues that pop up in iD - looks like this changeset got flagged for having points too close together. iD will have quick fixes for warnings, usually, so it's pretty easy to resolve.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181789597
maddog107 (2026-04-25 17:33:30+00:00): Ok, I will fix it, no one has ever complained to me for being too acurate and having to many nodes, but whatever, I will fix it lol.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-25 04:41:19+00:00): Well, your comment and your edit sounds not so good 😳
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-25 04:40:50+00:00): Well, your comment and your edit sounds not so good 😳
Alliegaytor (2026-04-25 03:55:57+00:00): Please ensure that the ways in the route are in order (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Relation:route#Order_matters) and don't include ways on the wrong direction of travel.

I've fixed this route in https://www.osm.org/changeset/181790595
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-25 04:39:44+00:00): Well, your comment and your edit sounds not so good 😳
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-26 09:54:04+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181790175
Totor (2026-04-29 04:40:57+00:00): Hi again,
Sorry for the numerous comments. Getting used to the tags in openstreetmap can be hard at first ^_^
Don't give up!
Sari-sari stores (tindahan) are usually mapped as shop=convenience.
Totor (2026-05-07 04:32:05+00:00): There is another Tindahan Ni Kalir more south-ouest. Duplicate?
NorthCrab_upload (2026-04-25 04:02:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536079473

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2026-05-14 13:37:19+00:00): poprawione
FajrAl (2026-04-26 14:08:52+00:00): di OpenStreetMap, tidak ada tag jasa=*
osmviborg (2026-04-25 05:58:34+00:00): Du slettede to store marker her?
Fizzie-DWG (2026-04-30 04:17:22+00:00): Revert duplicate mapping at OP request

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182015050
democat (2026-04-25 08:33:15+00:00): This changeset looks good, I think!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181791673
MapBtch (2026-04-25 10:35:36+00:00): dank voor herstellen - ik zag al dat de routes onderbroken waren door mijn aanpassingen, maar kwam er in josm nog niet uit hoe het te fixen.
artzi_tku (2026-05-10 10:35:54+00:00): Miten tänä polun pyöräilykielto siellä ilmeni? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129558509#map=16/64.55181/26.49728
Se on myös osa Rokuan maastopyöräreitti 34 km
https://rokuageopark.fi/maastopyoraily/#cat=Py%C3%B6r%C3%A4ily-main,Maastopy%C3%B6r%C3%A4ily
lankapuhelin (2026-05-13 17:47:39+00:00): Retkikartan karttalinkki Rokuan merkittyihin maastopyöräilyreitteihin: https://www.retkikartta.fi/?featureClass=routes&id=191656
artzi_tku (2026-05-13 17:57:48+00:00): Tiedän nämä viralliset, sama löytyy Rokuan sivuilta. Kyselinkin mistä on löytynyt tuon reitin bicycle: no OSM? Onko paikan päällä tuossa silti joku kieltomerkki? Ei tämän ole väliä, kunhan kyselin. Nykyään netistä löytyvä tieto voi olla vaikka kuinka vanhaa. Käyn lähiviikkona tuolla ja korjaan jos aihetta.
lankapuhelin (2026-05-13 18:06:59+00:00): Uskon toki että tiedät, laitoin tämän linkin muidenkin nähtäville (kuten tikolan) ja referenssiksi alueen pyöräilyoikeuksien kartoittamiseen sekä argumenttiasi tukemaan, jos joku näitä kommentteja sattuisi lukemaan. :)
iandees (2026-04-25 11:46:03+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6824725284 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181802594, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
vrabcak (2026-04-25 23:21:37+00:00): Thank you @iandees for noticing and fixing the problem. I'm just curious how did you spot it? Is there some tool to check this type of problems - I'd like to check my edits myself to prevent this.
iandees (2026-04-26 18:05:10+00:00): I have a system that watches OSM changes and calls out changes that add odd angles to ways and suggests a fix. I double check the fix and make the change. Right now it's not public.
eggie (2026-04-25 05:59:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Adresnodes horen eigenlijk op een gebouw. Hier ligt het adres in de tuin.
De spelling klopt ook niet helemaal. (Hoofdletter straatnaam?)
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-25 06:18:48+00:00): Ik heb de woning toegevoegd. 
CTRL-F5 voor het effect. Staatnaam gecorrigeerd.
MVG
eggie
FajrAl (2026-04-25 06:23:57+00:00): Ah, [TIL] that button will upload all the layers in JOSM.
FajrAl (2026-04-26 10:55:49+00:00): Or, it continues from previous changeset that was still open.
charl3s (2026-04-25 15:29:57+00:00): Gdzie przy tym odcinku stoi tabliczka z tą nazwą? Ta tabliczka stoi tylko przy dcinku S19 Lublin - Rzeszów
iandees (2026-04-25 11:46:20+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10857738197, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8821196389 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181802606, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
ZioDragon (2026-04-27 01:19:45+00:00): Please check the provinces in the northern region; all wards and communes are currently displaying "city," because the ward is designated as an urban area.
ZioDragon (2026-04-27 01:22:01+00:00): Additionally, a new node is needed after the merger; displaying the current old node would make it extremely difficult to find the new address.
Tommybara (2026-04-27 04:50:17+00:00): All wards and communes are currently displaying "city," --> This is also done by a mapper (Kiharu1410), which I do not agree with. See the discussion here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172306156
Tommybara (2026-04-27 04:55:20+00:00): I agree with adding the node for wards and communes, but not with tagging them "place=city". Same for the northern region that you mentioned.
ZioDragon (2026-04-27 17:38:41+00:00): Currently, the place=ward and place=commune tags are not supported in Vietnam, so the temporary solution is to use place=city. They will be available once support for these tags is updated. You can refer to Japan; they have 792 cities and 743 towns, all of which are second-level administrative units.
ZioDragon (2026-04-27 17:38:47+00:00): In Japan, urban areas are called cities, while in Vietnam they are called wards.
Rural areas in Japan are called towns, while in Vietnam they are called communes.
ZioDragon (2026-04-27 17:41:19+00:00): The simple issue is that Vietnam uses the Latin alphabet, so the letters are longer, while Japan uses Chinese characters, which are shorter. I understand you mean you don't want the place=city thing to be widespread.
mavl (2026-06-07 06:01:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183764451, 183764460, 183764431, 183764453, 183764448, 183764459, 183764455 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20768].
NieWnen (2026-04-25 15:49:56+00:00): Please don't make changes like this.
Try to avoid very large area of changes.
Edits generated by clicking random suggestions in the iD editor can often be unwanted or incorrect.

For example, adding public_transport=platform to highway=platform should be reverted.

This duplicates already existing nodes with highway=bus_stop. We don't add this in many cities in Poland because it's unnecessary, and it is still an issue with the iD editor.
maro21 (2026-04-25 18:54:34+00:00): Reverted.
You changed kindergartens into schools: https://osm.org/way/34627834 + https://osm.org/way/141080707 + https://osm.org/way/945873485 + https://osm.org/way/152321253 + https://osm.org/way/220562673 so it was undoubtedly an automated edit.
I would like to ask you to refrain from making such edits in the future and to familiarize yourself with the guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
Happy mapping
citrula (2026-07-31 04:07:20+00:00): Since this bay is (perhaps incorrectly?) mapped inside the coastline, I think this stopped the water area from rendering
SanurSurfSchool (2026-04-25 08:09:23+00:00): Surf school in Sanur offering beginner to intermediate lessons, surfboard rental, and coaching in Sanur reef and Serangan. Suitable for all levels. Also provides lessons for kitesurfing and foil sessions.  Taxi to surf breaks also available
eyecreate (2026-04-25 09:57:08+00:00): Made a mistake, there is a ramp here.
jomamoj (2026-05-09 20:04:08+00:00): Warum wurde https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117767535 gekürzt? Der Weg wird zwar vom Zaun der Landesgartenschau unterbrochen, aber er ist weiterhin vorhanden. Das verschlossene Tor lässt sich als barrier mit access=no taggen.
Hb- (2026-05-09 21:16:00+00:00): Ich hatte das nur schnell zusammen gepfuscht, damit überhaupt etwas zum Monatsende eingetragen war. Bitte mit mehr Ortskenntnis direkt ändern.
jomamoj (2026-05-10 10:29:42+00:00): ...wiederhergestellt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182458581
iandees (2026-04-25 11:46:28+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13031997987, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13759480835 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181802612, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Joel Koen (2026-07-22 09:01:20+00:00): Make sure to tag parking spaces with amenity=parking_space instead of amenity=parking :P
uftyv (2026-07-22 20:42:42+00:00): Oh shoot, oops! Thanks for noticing! I normally tag it with amenity=parking_space
Cy0nyx_PL (2026-04-26 15:56:22+00:00): Artykuł z gazety to nie dowód na zakończenie prac budowlanych. Proszę przedstawić dokumentację odbiorową ze Starostwa w Kole. Wycofuję zmiany i dodatkowo zgłaszam wandalizm
eggie (2026-04-25 09:21:51+00:00): Dag Xylene. Beter niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dit geeft vaak schade door onbedoelde verplaatsingen van nodes met alles dat daar aan vastzit.
Je wijzigingen zijn verder oke.

MVG
eggie
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-23 06:05:08+00:00): Reverted due SEO spam: just a bare name=* on a building

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183051663
MicDK (2026-04-25 09:19:51+00:00): I acknowledge your comments and the underlying perspective regarding mapping detail level and long-term maintainability.

Mapping conventions may differ, but my approach is consistent with OpenStreetMap principles of mapping verifiable, on-the-ground reality. My intention has been to align the data with detailed, observable geographic features as confirmed through aerial imagery, maps, local knowledge, and other reliable sources.

This also means that mapping should reflect current, verifiable conditions rather than anticipated future developments (e.g. areas of scrub that may later develop into woodland).

The data I have contributed represents what can currently be verified. As landscapes evolve over time, further updates and revisions may naturally occur to maintain accuracy, but only when they can be supported by new verifiable evidence.

At this stage, I prefer to resolve this locally and do not intend to escalate it to the community forum or the Data Working Group.
flohoff (2026-06-16 09:17:11+00:00): Moin,
du hast hier eine Verbindung vom Aldi parkplatz direkt auf die zufahrt zur Eggestraße gemacht. Mir ist die aufgefallen weil ich die für sehr seltsam halte. Dann hab ich die Mapillary Bilder durchgeguckt und kann kein Anzeichen dafür finden. Wo kommt die her?

Flo
MicDK (2026-04-25 10:00:07+00:00): Mapping conventions may differ, but my approach is consistent with OpenStreetMap principles of mapping verifiable, on-the-ground reality. My intention has been to align the data with detailed, observable geographic features as confirmed through aerial imagery, maps, local knowledge, and other reliable sources.

The data I have contributed represents what can currently be verified. As landscapes evolve over time, further updates and revisions may naturally occur to maintain accuracy, but only when they can be supported by new verifiable evidence.

Some edits in this area have changed over time. Verifiable features should be mapped or re-mapped based on current, reliable sources. Contributors are welcome to add or update such features.

At this stage, I prefer to resolve this locally and do not intend to escalate it to the community forum or the Data Working Group.
mavl (2026-06-07 06:02:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183764451, 183764460, 183764431, 183764453, 183764448, 183764459, 183764455 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20768].
DwarfNebula_ (2026-04-25 10:43:46+00:00): Hey, you're talking about a restaurant/food stall, but you changed a school. Is it a different object that needs to be checked?
keart (2026-04-25 10:51:34+00:00): Oops, this comment was not ment for this school. It's a different object that should be reviewed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181684334#map=19/36.377021/28.236392  My editor saved this comment that's why. Excuse me.
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-04-25 10:31:35+00:00): Có 1 số lỗi trong Vespucci nên changeset của tôi bị lấy mô tả từ changeset cũ, đính chính lại đây là 1 số chỉnh sửa của tôi về khu vực phường Hoàng Liệt
NorthCrab_upload (2026-04-25 11:13:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13760477183

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
RAC_UK (2026-04-26 14:17:54+00:00): Hi,

Sorry but I’ve put the node back until the data can be copied off of it.

The brand is probably wrong anyway as there at least 3 different coop brands in the area.

Regards

Richard
detective-fiasco (2026-04-25 10:41:04+00:00): See wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Original_tagging_of_Czech_railway_signals#N%C3%A1vrh_na_sjednocen%C3%AD_do_jednoho_vrcholu
keyyushi (2026-05-13 12:56:46+00:00): Merhaba, bazı durak rollerini platform'dan bus_stop değerine çevirmişsiniz. Bunun sebebi nedir?

Wiki'de böyle bir rol kullanımı gözükmüyor. Tekrar platform olacak şekilde bazılarını düzenledim. Eğer bir yanlışlık olduğunu düşünüyorsanız lütfen belirtin.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route=bus
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182600550
BC168 (2026-04-27 14:57:51+00:00): Moin,
wäre landuse=grass nicht passender? natural=grassland ist eigentlich mehr eine offene, naturbelassene Steppenlandschaft.