piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Halfix (2025-12-03 10:32:50+00:00): Hi, darf ich mal fragen was du mit den maxspeed=100 Einträgen erreichen willst? 100 ist der Default und seine Angabe erzeugt damit keinen Mehrwert. Wenn du darstellen möchtest, dass eine Straße dem deutschen Landstraßen-Default unterworfen ist, wäre es korrekt maxspeed=DE:rural zu verwenden statt eines fixen Wertes 100. Wenn du aber Tempoangaben machst, dann sollten sie auch sachlich richtig sein. Beim Way: KT 6 (36003747) - bei den Einheimischen Casteller Berg genannt - ist deine Angabe 100 definitiv falsch. Von Wüstenfelden kommend bergab ist da (wenn ich mich richtig erinnere) nacheinander auf 70-50-30 beschränkt. Bergauf ist, glaube ich, keine Beschränkung, da müsste man also ggf. mit maxspeed backward und forward arbeiten. Gruß Gerhard (Halfix).
Dawid2849 (2025-12-02 13:19:33+00:00): Może coś z historic=*
kubahahaha (2025-12-02 13:25:48+00:00): Jak masz pomsył to śmiało - mi się wydaje że ten teren niczego nie oznacza i można by to zrobić porządnie - czyli wyrysować pola/krzaki/ukształtowanie terenu - i wtedy byłby widać zarys fortów.

Jak chcesz to otwórz uwagę
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4989484
eggie (2025-12-02 13:51:40+00:00): Oke.. dan zal het nu correct zijn.
Groet..
eggie
streckenkundler (2025-12-02 17:59:15+00:00): Hallo Jacky,

Danke für die Anpassungen! Also wie verlaufen die Routen nun: 
1. 87-88
2. 82-87
3. 82-88
4. 80-88
5. 88-99
Richtig?

Knoppuntnet zeigt nähmlich noch Fehler...

Dann passe ich das morgen an...

Viele Grüße,

Sven
streckenkundler (2025-12-02 17:59:48+00:00): Ach ja, vergessen:

https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/route/19478966/map?layers=background,cycling,nodes,forward-route,backward-route&position=53.14808819,12.18207369,16
streckenkundler (2025-12-06 20:55:11+00:00): Hei, ich noch mal... ich hab mir das mit euren Daten nochmal in Ruhe angeschaut... https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/4605c26759e84658844c53ec7ef6d6d9?draft=true#widget_6=active_datasource_id:dataSource_2,center:1356494.19119167%2C7010237.657371881%2C102100,scale:25118.78038461627,level:-1,rotation:0,viewpoint:%7B%22rotation%22%3A0%2C%22scale%22%3A25118.78038461627%2C%22targetGeometry%22%3A%7B%22spatialReference%22%3A%7B%22latestWkid%22%3A3857%2C%22wkid%22%3A102100%7D%2C%22x%22%3A1356494.19119167%2C%22y%22%3A7010237.657371881%7D%7D,layer_visibility:%7B%22widget_6-dataSource_2%22%3A%7B%22widget_6-dataSource_2-19372da1ba7-layer-12%22%3Afalse%2C%22widget_6-dataSource_2-Radverkehr_Fotostandorte_4725%22%3Atrue%2C%22widget_6-dataSource_2-18b3c7fbb4c-layer-14%22%3Atrue%2C%22widget_6-dataSource_2-TourismusFreizeitPrignitz_1350%22%3Afalse%2C%22widget_6-dataSource_2-TourismusFreizeitPrignitz_1871%22%3Afalse%2C%22widget_6-dataSource_2-Radwege_strassenbegleitend_54%22%3Afalse%2C%22widget_6-dataSource_2-Radwegebedarf_8426%22%3Afalse%2C%22widget_6-dataSource_2-19377f960aa-layer-15%22%3Afalse%7D%7D

Es ist anders (?) Die Knotenpunkte 87, 88 und 99 gibt es nicht mehr? Durch Pritzwalk geht es vom Knotenpunkt 80 zum Knotenpunkt 82 (vorbei an den ehem. Knotenpunkten 88 und 87) Die Route rüber zum ehem. Knotenpunkt 99 gibt es auch nicht mehr.

Eine für mich sehr wichtige und für OSM entscheidende Frage: Darf eure Karten-Webseite (siehe erster Link) lizenzrechtlich für OSM genutzt werden? Wenn ja, wäre das allgemein eine sehr große Hilfe. Mit eurer Foto-Dokumentation ließen sich Routen den ausgeschilderten Situationen anpassen.

Als mögliche, dann zu setzende Quellenangabe im Changeset  müsste sich was passendes ausgedacht werden. Wenn ich z.B. die LGB-Daten nutze, gebe ich z.B. stets "source=Geobasis-DE/LGB (2025)/ DOP20CIR" an. In vergleichbarer Form würde ich hier auch denken.

Viele Grüße aus dem Spreewald,

Sven
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-23 08:21:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-23 08:21:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856
ZABuild (2025-12-02 12:43:54+00:00): sorry the source is local survey, not aerial imagery
eggie (2025-12-02 13:23:43+00:00): Dag MHBart,

Alleen een description zal niets doen in OSM
Wellicht even hier kijken.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-02 13:24:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-02 13:19:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  name=Pathé is het geen dat je ziet op de kaart. Daar hoeft geen name:nl=Pathé Tuschinski bij.
Die regel kan denk ik weg.
Waarom ook een Engelse naam?

MVG
eggie
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
ImprovingStepByStep (2026-01-02 23:25:01+00:00): Tuschinski point of interest bestaat al. Deze is hierdoor dubble. Ik haal deze weg en voeg de officiele naam toe aan het al veel langer bestaande andere point of interest.
DimaLebedev (2026-01-26 10:15:03+00:00): #mapbox_missing_roads
Frans S (2025-12-22 10:09:59+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not cluster multiple buildings and tag them as 1 building.
Best regards
kabelhaai (2025-12-08 15:12:29+00:00): Waarom verwijderd u al deze extra tags? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88675526/history/13 + Er is nu een dubbele office=government. Ik haal de extra node weg nu het op het gebouw staat.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-03 00:53:08+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zawierać przedrostka. Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zaczynać się od 'ul.', 'ulica' itp. Należy usunąć przedrostek i pozostawić samą nazwę ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13347495011

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

Zasady nazewnictwa ulic w polsce:
https://wiki.osm.org/Pl:Znakowanie_dróg_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-03 01:43:06+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zawierać przedrostka. Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zaczynać się od 'ul.', 'ulica' itp. Należy usunąć przedrostek i pozostawić samą nazwę ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13347495011

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

Zasady nazewnictwa ulic w polsce:
https://wiki.osm.org/Pl:Znakowanie_dróg_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Sylabowy Kot (2025-12-03 10:24:31+00:00): Poprawiłem to, o czym bot się powtórzył.
djsa (2025-12-04 11:20:51+00:00): Beste,

Op Lara is dit gecatalogeerd als openbare weg, zou u dit via de gemeente kunnen aanpassen?

Zie:
https://api.basisregisters.vlaanderen.be/v2/wegsegmenten/141219

Vriendelijke groeten
Mobi-Herent (2025-12-04 13:35:12+00:00): OK, dankjewel, ik heb dat aan mijn collega bij Stedenbouw gevraagd.
Mobi-Herent (2025-12-04 14:28:06+00:00): Werd aangepast!
djsa (2025-12-04 17:02:55+00:00): Perfect, merci!
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-12-02 13:44:42+00:00): 虽然是用rapid编辑的但是并没有用到任何AI生成的数据集——因为它们不够人类的精细

https://imgur.com/a/dfc84xR

还是看看人工队的吧
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-12-02 13:46:09+00:00): （Translated）

Rapidで編集しましたが、AI生成のデータセットは一切使っていません。人間ほどの精密さがないからです。
 
やはり、人類チームの成果を見ることにしましょう。
eggie (2025-12-02 14:02:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Frans S (2025-12-09 10:31:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Rather accurately mapped. However, do not cluster multiple buildings and map them as 1 building.
When an object shows no shadow, it is not above ground level, so don't map it as a building.
Best regards and keep mapping
eggie (2025-12-02 14:01:03+00:00): Dag MyCoach,

Paar dingen die niet kloppen,
Waarom name:nl=Engels ?
Kan die regel weg? 
.. loc_name?? wellicht beter short_name?

Verder ontbreekt de aard van de instelling/bedrijf  Wellicht office=?

Kijk anders even hier..
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office

Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175403712

MVG
eggie
ion_chi (2025-12-02 14:24:11+00:00): Reverted as this building still exists https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175405154
jemm (2025-12-30 17:51:22+00:00): Looks like that adding motorcar=no may mess with GTFS validation tools. I'd suggest that you add explicit bus=yes and maybe even psv=yes.
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-02 16:10:15+00:00): Please make sure the data you're updating against is actually still valid and relevant.  This has been a diverging diamond interchange for years at this point.

It's generally inadvisable to map places you haven't been and aren't familiar with.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175404844
sarya_Lyft (2025-12-11 08:52:00+00:00): Hi Baloo Uriza, 

My name is Surender, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft.
 I appreciate your feedback. Regarding my edits: I updated the geometry to reflect a diamond interchange and added two missing motorway_links based on ESRI World Imagery (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UgH_0KOEuzEenPAtzkS2Qt0f3wp8Y1qa/view?usp=sharing) and Lyft’s street-level imagery from April 2025 (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CvCw4REiwqoksXMvCCKON04IpKPiONaI/view?usp=sharing).
 I wasn’t fully familiar with destination and related tagging, so I only added the missing linkways with the highway type and oneway tag & left other tags. 
Thank you for making the necessary corrections. I apologize for any inconvenience my edits may have caused, and I’ll be more careful with future changesets.

Happy Mapping!
Best Regards,
Surander
bxl-forever (2025-12-02 14:50:36+00:00): Thanks for the information but please do *not* delete objects from the database.  This building is still visible on the official GRB basemap and on aerial imagery.  If you delete it, there will be a gap on the map and people who look at reference maps will simply add it again.

The correct way to deal with such a case is to keep the object but change its tags, so that editors can understand that there *was* a building here.

We fixed your edit.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170480480

Have a nice day.
KennyDap (2025-12-02 14:21:30+00:00): Buildings need to be mapped from their base, not their roof. So your changes are incorrect, and you need to restore everything to its original state.
b-jazz (2025-12-06 18:43:28+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1455461105

Please don't put double nodes at the end of the hole definition. I see this once in a while and am confused as to why people are doing this. Maybe you could clear it up for me. Is some documentation (wrongly) telling you to do this?

Please see the wiki page at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:golf%3Dhole for better understanding of how to map out golf=hole lines. Thanks.
benguuuuu (2025-12-06 19:47:02+00:00): I was using it to close out the line.  Still new at this - relax.
DslAz (2025-12-02 17:11:13+00:00): Details of this building’s geographic location and surrounding areas:

Local Name:
জোহাওয়ার্ল্ড (name:bn)
ZuhaWorld (name:en)
Type: Apartment Building
House Number: 265
Area: Muradpur
Word: 52
Street Name: Hazi Lal Miah Sarkar Rd
City Corporation: Dhaka South
Zone: 5
Post Office: Gandaria
Police Station: Kadamtali
Post Code: 1204
City: Dhaka
District: Dhaka
Country: Bangladesh
Location: 23.6984263, 90.4418867
Source: local knowledge
felipeeugenio (2025-12-02 18:54:55+00:00): Hola. Hay una aduana exactamente ahí?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175405178
Jhonatan07 (2025-12-02 19:27:17+00:00): Si, pero por alguna razon no traza una ruta por ahi, por ejemplo de frutillar a bariloche se pasa por ahi, pero me traza la ruta por una aduana mas al norte
Jhonatan07 (2025-12-02 19:42:13+00:00): Perdon , me equivoque, es la aduana de mas adelante la que aparece como camino privado y no es asi
felipeeugenio (2025-12-02 19:52:42+00:00): Hola.
Borré la aduana en la frontera misma, porque definitivamente no queda ahí.

La aduana más al norte es la chilena y no veo caminos privados. A qué se refiere?
felipeeugenio (2025-12-02 19:55:26+00:00): Estoy revisando con el ruteador de la página y funciona perfecto. ¿Cuál es el problema?
Por favor contestar por acá los mensajes, no en el privado.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-18 08:40:43+00:00): Hello
User @sismooni baby2 سيسموني بيبيتو
You have ruined another part with the changes you have made here. I will correct them. But if you want to edit again, you must first be trained, read the rules and then proceed to edit. If you make the wrong edit again in the same case, it will mean that the vandalism is intentional.
Vonter (2025-12-03 05:41:00+00:00): Hello!

Multiple government agencies, including BMRCL, BMTC and DULT, have an office within the Shantinagar TTMC building complex. It seems some of those government office nodes got deleted in these changesets, so I have restored them in a follow up changeset.

Regards,
Vonter
arjunaraoc (2025-12-03 15:01:20+00:00): I got confused between BMRC and BMTC  I realised my mistake  after some time and reverted the incorrect changeset myself. Thanks for monitoring and alerting/ correcting.
BrummsLee (2025-12-03 11:50:43+00:00): Der Tag "living_street" 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=living_stree
impliziert bereits Schrittgeschwindigkeit!
Man muß auch Fußgängern nicht hier über eine Note vorschreiben wollen, wo sie in einem verkehrsberuhigten Bereich zu laufen haben... 😉
Chuck Norris 86 (2025-12-03 15:18:11+00:00): Meine Entscheidung bleibt so wie sie ist und damit basta!!!
Wenn man mit dem Fahrrad hier entlangfahren will, sollten sich KEINE Personen zu fünft oder zu sechst nebeneinander von A nach B bewegen. Auch wenn hier Schrittgeschwindigkeit zu fahren ist, die meisten halten sich ohnehin NICHT daran, ist es rücksichtslos ggü. den fahrenden VTern!!!!!
Peer van Daalen (2026-03-22 22:44:06+00:00): Chuck Norris ist gestorben!
eggie (2025-12-02 15:59:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Dit was een officieel adres. Beter dat niet verwijderen.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-02 16:03:36+00:00): Het adres heb ik hersteld..
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175406279
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-03 08:16:00+00:00): Dit lijkt me correct
Gr eggie
silversurfer83 (2025-12-02 15:44:00+00:00): Moin :)

ob die einzelne Mühle im SW dazugehört ist tatsächlich eine gute Frage. Hier in der Gegend sind die Parks recht kleinteilig, da kann es schonmal sein, dass zwei getrennte Parks recht nah beieinander stehen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175406532
Sven50981103 (2026-05-07 19:40:08+00:00): Zum way/1446757333
Im Marktstammdatenregister ist das eine Enercon E-160 mit 5.56 MW
Die anderen WKA sind als Vestas gelistet, scheint eine Ausnahme zu sein - oder ein Fehler in der Liste. Warst Du vor Ort?
onterof (2026-06-08 14:46:30+00:00): Laut Register ist aktuell noch eine zweite E-160 süd-östlich im Bau, die zusammen als eigener Windpark ausgewiesen sind. Die erste ist auch erst später in Betrieb gegangen, nicht schon 2025. Hab das mal entsprechend eingetragen bzw. aufgeteilt.
Comino (2025-12-02 16:13:12+00:00): Hi,

I've updated the name to comply with the rules on OSM. I also added the address. Is it correct that you physically visited today? That's what the survey:date=2025-12-02 tag seems to indicate.
If so, you probably also have the hotel's phone number. Would you mind adding that as well?

And just so you know, advertising, like you did in the hotel's name, is not allowed.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
slybtc (2025-12-03 06:24:24+00:00): Sorry, this is not to advertise! I want to make it clear that booking and paying in btc is only possible by use of the airbtc platform and self-check in. How do I do that then? You cannot show up and book a room.
Comino (2025-12-03 10:32:41+00:00): Per the OpenStreetMap rules, this counts as advertising.  The name=* tag is reserved for the hotel’s actual name, nothing else.

Please review  
[https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice)  
and  
[https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tags](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tags).  

No OSM tag exists for the extra information you want to add.
Chieftl (2026-02-12 11:08:15+00:00): Вітаю,
Хотів дізнатися, для чого ви перемістили поштомат Нової пошти №5974 від АТБ (Слобідська 2) до будинку Слобідська 4а?
Поштомат досі стоїть біля АТБ і на сайті Нової пошти він теж вказаний там:
https://novaposhta.ua/departments/16277
letsridebikes (2025-12-02 15:58:58+00:00): How do you know it's access=no? You haven't visited any of these sites to survey permissions
run'n'ride (2025-12-02 18:35:33+00:00): I do visit...I also confirm on OS maps. Footpath only, so access all is No, foot is designated. Not difficult to understand & ensure footpath is correctly marked. Marking as yes to All results in apps/maps that use OSM showing these as if they're a ROW, which is not the case for all. Not going to discuss further.
letsridebikes (2025-12-02 18:37:49+00:00): "Confirming on OS maps" is a serious copyright violation
letsridebikes (2025-12-02 18:47:44+00:00): You've not visited this location; I was here on Sunday, and there are no signs prohibiting access by other users. Stop damaging the map. You've been asked many times to stop doing this https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-access-no-tagging-of-uk-public-rights-of-way/132798
SomeoneElse (2025-12-02 21:43:11+00:00): Hello,
Andy from the Data Working Group here - just picking up a couple of points from the above:

> I also confirm on OS maps. 

For the avoidance of doubt, we can't use that as a source for OSM, unless it's either out of copyright (many old maps are) or released under a compatible licence (like OSM OpenMap local.  However, none of these will tell you much about the current state of a path or track (but if, as you have, you've visited as well, whatever the OS says is moot).

> Footpath only, so access all is No, foot is designated

Yes, something signed as a public footpath as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1455397161/history is here should be foot=yes or designated (as well as designation=public_footpath), but the fact that something is a public footpath doesn't mean that other traffic is "no" - I can think of plenty of counterexamples from permissive bridleways to farm show access roads and more besides.

> Marking as yes to All results in apps/maps that use OSM showing these as if they're a ROW.

I don't think that people have suggested that - the tag changes on the northern bit can be seen at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/1455397161 and the other part https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/119370360 .  No-one has tried to suggest "access=yes" here as far as I can see.

As to what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/119370360 should be tagged as, "access=no" or "=private" would make sense if there were e.g. gates and/or big keep out signs.  However, "=permissive" would make sense where there was genuine permissive access, as would not setting it if it really wasn't clear.
I can think of plenty of examples of all of those.
Best Regards,
Andy
gromzx (2025-12-04 02:49:25+00:00): These changes don't appear to reflect reality, with one road in particular extending into the shopping centre itself.
Should these changes be reverted?
349179440 (2025-12-02 15:22:57+00:00): this chnageset should not be so big, i only changed the river at the top a little bit
DimaLebedev (2026-01-26 10:15:16+00:00): #mapbox_missing_roads
map per (2025-12-10 15:22:42+00:00): Because of 'review_requested':
I separated Calterah from the address and added it as a separate office node. The edit looks good apart form that, thank you!
eggie (2025-12-02 16:06:40+00:00): Beste Jaap. Hoe kan nu een adres veranderen?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-02 16:08:36+00:00): Ik heb het adres weer hersteld.  Anders komt een adres 2x voor en een ander is verdwenen.
Alle adresnodes liggen gewoon op een hoopje op elkaar als import vanuit de BAG.
Svp geen adressen aanpassen.
MVG
eggie
Jaap de Boer (2025-12-03 11:37:13+00:00): Hallo Eggie, 
excuus. 
Ik was niet goed aan het opletten. Sorry voor de verwarring.
JezCrow (2025-12-10 18:11:38+00:00): I'd be interested to know the source for the change in limit from 30 to 60 just to the south of Wilton village as you cannot see anything on Bing Aerial due to tree cover? Does the database you're using also contain weight limits, as I was unsure of the full extent of the restriction?
eggie (2025-12-02 16:04:45+00:00): Dag Dennis . Het zou zomaar kunnen, maar heeft het pand ook geen adres meer?
Dat heb je ook verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-02 16:05:53+00:00): Adres hersteld
denniskuijs (2025-12-02 16:06:24+00:00): Het adres bestaat wel nog, alleen de winkel niet meer.
denniskuijs (2025-12-02 16:06:34+00:00): Mijn excuses!
eggie (2025-12-02 16:09:13+00:00): No problem..
surveyor54 (2025-12-02 15:58:31+00:00): CS-Korrektur:
Naturschutzgebiet "Hollenhaus" eingepflegt
mavl (2025-12-02 16:07:30+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 165809183, 165810241, 166873091, 166873665, 170151178, 174052267, 174075087.
SpinOff (2025-12-04 13:00:57+00:00): Dzięki. Droga polna na południe od niej nie była narysowana i wyglądało to jak przesunięcie względem orto.
NeisBot (2025-12-13 22:10:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Scuba diving center in Hikkaduwa"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-13 22:34:46+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175493384
VLD192 (2025-12-03 16:07:29+00:00): Hello,

I am reaching out regarding some edits made in this changeset. While I understand the name tag updates, the removal of the crossing data seems to be a regression. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1088318384/history, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1136328446/history, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1297040325/history, for examples. 

I have noticed similar edits in changesets https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175410091 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175413456. Any clarification would be appreciated and I look forward to hearing from you. Thanks.
Casey (VLD192)
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-04 01:18:01+00:00): the changesets being reverted were primarily about stripping sidewalks of their street names.
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-04 01:18:52+00:00): Reverting those changesets was done to restore names incorrectly stripped from cycleways and sidewalks.
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-02 18:17:29+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее.

После того как нарисовали здание не забывайте нажимать Q, чтобы выпрямить его