piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
7beren (2025-10-27 08:14:04+00:00): I agree with you. You can alter the nam.
ezekielf (2025-10-17 15:37:46+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contributions.  It looks like you accidentally dragged a node off a river area here and it created a weird spike of water encroaching on the neighborhood 😀.  Just a heads up to be careful of that.  I've fixed it here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173416967
AndyB_66 (2025-09-23 19:20:36+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
eggie (2025-09-22 06:34:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-09-22 06:37:11+00:00): Het paaltje heb ik in het midden geplaatst.
user_5359 (2025-09-22 07:20:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition!
I had to correct your node. The keys must be entered one per line. Incidentally, the cameras use an ALPR process and do not (!) have the name flock cam.
maro21 (2025-09-22 16:13:09+00:00): Skoro jest budowa drogi, to w takim razie te ulice https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26840374 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/794477571 są nieprzejezdne, a ten budynek https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100731321 wyburzony?
Gdy powstaje nowy obiekt, to usuwamy to co było na jego miejscu. Nie może być dwóch naraz.
Bruno Arina (2025-11-11 15:32:54+00:00): Buongiorno Andrea, ho visto che stai eliminando il tag "sac_scale"  da diverse relazioni, anche quelle che non hanno i tag del CAI. Io non lo uso mai nelle mie relazioni ma perchè eliminarlo se qualcuno lo inserisce ?  Cordiali saluti
Andrea Del Sarto (2025-11-11 16:34:10+00:00): Buon pomeriggio Bruno,
il tag sac_scale non può essere messo alle relazioni, va inserito solo nelle way; come indicato nella wiki del tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sac_scale

saluti e buona mappatura
eggie (2025-09-22 06:39:00+00:00): Pavel.. Het is gebruikelijk om die parkeerhavens als vlakken in te tekenen.
De tagging op zelf is oke.
MVG
eggie
oldnab (2026-01-16 12:05:37+00:00): Bonjour, êtes-vous sûr de la présence de la caméra que vous avez cartographiée au croisement D113 - C6 en sempembre 2025 ?. Elle n'apparaît pas sur les séquences panoramax du 10/01/2026 (ni sur les street-view d'avril 2025) ?
MaxR_6429 (2026-01-16 15:01:34+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai constaté la présence de ces caméras lors de mon passage  avant que je les ajoute dans OSM. 
Elles ont tendance à pousser très vite en Ile de France en ce moment !
oldnab (2026-01-16 17:30:13+00:00): Merci. Il semble en fait qu'elle ait été déplacée de l'autre côté de la départementale (voir images panoramax 360 du 10 janvier 2026). Je me suis donc permis de déplacer le point et d'y ajouter le lampadaire.
woodpeck (2025-09-21 21:07:17+00:00): Dear Moldovan_Merkator, in the future it would be good if you could link to the community decisions that form the basis of such edits. If the community decision has taken place in a place that requires signup (eg Telegram, Facebook, Slack) then put a summary on the OSM wiki.
Moldovan_Merkator (import) (2025-09-21 21:22:20+00:00): Sure, it was made on our Telegram, if you have any questions, feel yoursel free to ask - https://t.me/OSMMoldova
woodpeck (2025-09-22 08:24:47+00:00): Hi, this is not what I meant. Anyone, even ten years from now, should be able to know what was going on, without having to subscribe to a platform (that may not even exist then, or may have scrubbed the community decision). Please write a page on the OSM wiki that summarizes the community decision and in the future when you make large-scale edits include a link to that page in your changeset comment. This is not information that other mappers should "ask" for, it is information that you should provide without asking.
Moldovan_Merkator (import) (2025-09-22 10:55:57+00:00): Oh, yes, now I understand, you're right, for the future I will do as how you asked, sorry for misunderstanding and for disturbing
brzep (2025-09-21 21:01:28+00:00): based on local knowledge and photos
NeisBot (2025-09-21 21:16:56+00:00): Hi Mushtaq78, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added parking reference and website details"
Sammyhawkrad (2025-09-22 07:25:02+00:00): Hello Dosoo Othniel, welcome to OSM. Please note that the accepted way of adding names of places is using the Title Case. ALL UPPERCASE NAMES are not favoured. I'll advise you to modify your changes to match the ones around, e.g Golden Jubilee Clinic, Bungalow 1, Old Dining Hall, etc.
Langlaeufer (2025-09-22 20:12:15+00:00): Bist du dir sicher mit diesem Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58302121, damit ist der Radweg an der B6 nicht mehr ereichbar.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172267768
Marvk (2025-09-22 20:45:11+00:00): Hi Langlaeufer, ja, leider ist der Radweg von beiden Seiten komplett mit Bauzäunen gesperrt, hab am Samstag versucht, von beiden Richtungen draufzufahren: https://i.imgur.com/sDzLfOc.png
Marvk (2025-09-22 20:46:40+00:00): Eine Umleitung ist aber leider nur für Kraftfahrzeuge ausgeschildert.
Langlaeufer (2025-09-22 21:35:55+00:00): O.k danke Dir für die Infos.
Sammyhawkrad (2025-11-13 12:02:26+00:00): Bonjour, les frontières que vous avez ajoutées ici en Côte d'Ivoire traversent également des frontières internationales.
SuborbitalPigeon (2025-09-21 22:32:32+00:00): Not actually carve-outs, damned autocomplete
user_5359 (2025-09-23 06:51:45+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/1624934119. What is the mean of the tag 웨이위안진 = 징구현?
NeisBot (2025-09-21 22:51:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
ExpediaCruises (2025-09-21 23:28:37+00:00): Are you able to do that, how would you go about doing that.
NeisReview (2025-09-26 15:58:12+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172277719
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-03 19:33:55+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226293093/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle:repair and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service:bicycle:repair
b-jazz (2025-09-26 16:13:00+00:00): Thanks for the contributions jwelchjunk. Just to let you know, the tee box (golf=tee) shouldn't have a name. I'll go ahead and clean that up for this course, but wanted to let you know for your future mapping projects. Thanks!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-09-22 11:02:08+00:00): Hi!

THere is indeed a transition from 3 to 4 lanes here. Please follow wiki on placement transition and do not remove these tags.

When we use placement=transition with width:lanes:start or width:lanes:start, we must include the partial lane also. Thus the tags were correct before the edit. See the updated version of the wiki on lanes (motorway section): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes
skumarchandela_lyft (2025-09-23 11:29:09+00:00): Hello, ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy!
My name is Sumit, and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft and Gaurav’s Teammate.
Thank you again for your message. Based on Lyft-owned aerial imagery most up to date imagery in this case https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ly7_qVDdvMjTBfqSwGgz96o8VoSBLtWz/view?usp=sharing and freshest Lyft owned street-level imagery as of 2025-09-12 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1I9YgPQ7vgtovPtKek1RiGa0EkWbh31uJ/view?usp=sharing  there is only three lanes visible and there is no transition to four lanes.
I would truly appreciate it if you could provide your thoughts on the above sources and our edits. 

As mentioned, we have limited experience with the placement tag, and we missed the value transition. I apologize once again for this mistake and thank you for correcting it. We will definitely follow your suggestions and update our policy based on OSM wiki.


The screenshots will be available for a month. Please let me know if you are unable to view them within this timeframe – I could generate them once again.


Regards,
Sumit
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-09-23 12:21:44+00:00): Thanks!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-09-23 12:22:51+00:00): Can you confirm that you have the right to use NearMap with OSM, because it is clearly said on the wiki that NearMap cannot be used because of its restricted license:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NearMap_PhotoMaps
skumarchandela_lyft (2025-09-23 13:06:31+00:00): Yes, we have an explicit contract approval from Nearmap to use the imagery for OSM editing
Mapiate (2025-09-28 10:35:24+00:00): Hi, please be aware that you have added some buildings in this import that don't exist in reality. An example is this building added in between the interstate: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1431849612/ 

Also the import process has added untagged nodes for each building that was added and that need some clean-up.
Timothy Larouche (2025-09-28 12:32:41+00:00): Good morning, @Mapiate . Thank you for your comment. Yes, it's a semi-automated import with a lot of manual verification, and I probably missed that. I will fix it in the next changeset.
Timothy Larouche (2025-09-28 12:55:14+00:00): @Mapiate, fixed in the changesets:
- 172565095
- 172565456
- 172565547
Mapiate (2025-09-28 20:05:53+00:00): Thanks for the quick response and updates. Much appreciated!
muralito (2025-09-22 13:06:32+00:00): Same as the other recent near changeset. Are you sure these are oneway?
Montserrat1 (2025-09-23 15:27:49+00:00): Hello muralito,

It seemed logical to add the oneways here, as this seems to function similarly to a roundabout junction. I can understand otherwise as there are no road markings or signage for this. If you disagree on the oneways here I will defer to your knowledge.

Have a nice day!
muralito (2025-09-23 17:51:24+00:00): Hi. Yes, I agree that it may seems logical, but also it doesn't model the real world, as the traffic authorities have not established a one-way direction on that road. We shouldn't tag restrictions that doesn't exists in real world.
Montserrat1 (2025-09-25 16:17:44+00:00): That makes sense, I will refrain from adding oneways on these kinds of intersections unless clearly marked. Thanks for your input here!
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-26 16:00:37+00:00): Что за Сова?
HerryCFPL (2025-10-04 13:19:55+00:00): 您好，根据https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:Key:place:CN#%E9%80%9A%E7%94%A8%E5%80%BC，社区应该是place:CN=neighbourhood而不是place:CN=community。请您修改一下
HerryCFPL (2025-10-04 13:23:02+00:00): 看到麻烦私信一下，评论的系统消息会被当成垃圾邮件
Higashimado (2025-10-04 19:55:06+00:00): 您好，感谢提醒，已替换
ar3o (2025-09-22 03:00:43+00:00): I need to fix all the warnings, most were it being upset that the giant road crosses springs.
muralito (2025-09-22 12:56:17+00:00): Are you sure?
Montserrat1 (2025-09-23 15:28:20+00:00): Hello muralito, I’ve responded to your question on this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172270841.
Glassman (2025-09-23 00:09:42+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Unfortunately https://peakbagger.com/ restricts use of their data and I have to remove this edit. If you can find a public domain source, such as the county GIS, or USGS National Map then it can be added back.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172272529
NeisBot (2025-09-22 03:39:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-26 15:57:42+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172276926
TheNightRider (2025-09-22 04:20:31+00:00): Accidentally allowed iD to auto-complete the changeset comments, which should have been just, "Added 1 disabled stall". Info was from street-level photos, not aerial imagery.
NeisBot (2025-09-22 05:36:19+00:00): Hi OzHornet, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added waterfall waterway with name Lower Ikoymarrwa"
NeisBot (2025-09-22 04:48:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
okadatsuneo_import (2025-09-22 04:46:54+00:00): 49295783 が正
okadatsuneo_import (2025-09-22 04:47:19+00:00): 49295784 が正
Gregory_Lexus (2025-09-22 04:57:03+00:00): сайт сам дополнил текст, на самом деле я просто сделал более точные границы здания
s777n (2025-09-26 19:28:14+00:00): Здравствуйте. Здания рисуются по-другому. Спутниковые снимки обычно под углом и на них видно и крышу и стену. Не нужно обводить стену иначе получится огромное здание - как получилось у вас. 
Вместо этого нужно обвести крышу а потом смести ее к основанию. Когда здание состоит из нескольких частей то и рисовать нужно по частям. Сначала обвести крышу самой высокой части потои сместить частично сместить эту часть на необходимое количество этажей ближе к основанию нарисовать более низкую часть и т.д. Если этого не делать то опять же форма здания будет совершенно другой
Вы совместили два задние в одно. В егрн это числится как два разных здания и на панорамах видно промежуток между ними.
Перерисовал.
NeisBot (2025-09-22 06:26:24+00:00): Hi DocBrown06, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added massage shop with wifi and russian name and specified opening hours"
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-09-22 05:23:54+00:00): Source: https://youtu.be/4FDTP_nblE8?t=132
sosquqer (2025-12-17 08:26:19+00:00): 👋 Is it on a private territory? If it is so, it might be worth tagging with the access tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Tosenbo (2025-10-08 21:59:20+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai remis le tag Voie de bus, je rappelle que ce n'est pas une bonne pratique de tag dans le but explicite d'influencer le rendu ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Taguer_pour_le_rendu )

C'est à la couche OSM Carto de se mettre à jour pour afficher les voies bus, et non à nous de modifier les tags pour s'adapter à OSM Carto, d'ailleurs on peut voir les voies de bus déjà sur la Carte de transport ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/50.419785/2.903368&layers=TN )
NeisBot (2025-09-22 06:03:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-28 10:29:32+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172460631
NeisReview (2025-09-28 10:30:18+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172276667
NeisBot (2025-09-22 06:42:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-28 10:28:56+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172288996
Langlaeufer (2025-09-22 20:09:30+00:00): Wie falsch beschildert?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172276884
Nadjita (2025-09-23 06:07:06+00:00): Es gibt bei den Ausfahrten des verkehrsberuhigten Bereichs keine Zone-30-Schilder
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172276884
Langlaeufer (2025-09-23 06:34:52+00:00): Das hatte ich neulich auch in Laatzen bei einer on 30er Zone eingebetteten Vbz.
maro21 (2025-09-22 16:18:20+00:00): To nie są trawniki, tylko ogródki przydomowe.
dzamper (2025-09-22 07:30:45+00:00): Whoops. Thanks for the correction
eggie (2025-09-22 07:48:04+00:00): Dag Sepiver  Bij Rijksweg 46 loopt wel degelijk een pad.
Zo te zien zelfs met betontegels.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-22 07:50:47+00:00): Pad als private teruggezet. Voorlopig maar surface=grass gehouden. 
gr eggie
Sepiver (2025-09-22 07:54:59+00:00): Er loopt een pad van betontegels van het erf naar het hek aan de zuidkant van het erf, maar er loopt geen pad door het weiland tussen de twee hekken. Ik ben hier vanmorgen geweest. Privepad van grass vind ik prima though
eggie (2025-09-22 08:14:11+00:00): Oke... we zijn eruit   ..

 :)

mapse
Sepiver (2025-09-22 08:21:30+00:00): hetzelfde! bedankt voor de feedback!
Carto'Cité (2025-11-16 08:44:01+00:00): Bonjour cantece,

Il semblerait que cet aménagement n'est pas une piste mais une bande à double sens :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1120640020
Je modifie dans ce sens et si tu m'apprends qu'il y a une piste que a été construite depuis la photo aérienne de 2024, alors j'annulerai ma modification :)

Si tu passes dans le secteur, le mieux est de documenter ce type d'aménagement par des photos dans Panoramax avec l'application Baba par exemple.

Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
NeisBot (2025-09-22 07:12:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-28 10:28:35+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172355911
osmviborg (2025-09-22 07:41:39+00:00): Det er ikke i orden at slette adgangsveje til boliger, du må gerne tagge dem som private; men slette dem må du ikke.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172277839
KKM2021 (2025-09-22 09:55:52+00:00): De er tagget som private og går lige igennem landbrugsbygninger med stort maskinel etc. Men Strava m.fl. foreslår dem stadig som løbe ruter etc., og derfor slettes de. For Strava besvarer ikke henvendelser.
osmviborg (2025-09-22 10:22:50+00:00): Hvis en vej/sti i OSM er tagget med adgangsbegrænsningen privat, er det op til de enkelte dataforbrugere at respektere dette forhold. Du har slettet korrekte data fra OSM, det er en fejl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
KKM2021 (2025-09-22 12:52:28+00:00): Ok med adgangsveje til boliger. Du har ret. De skal blot markeres tydeligt som private.
Yog Sot (2025-09-22 08:09:45+00:00): ślady gps to niedostateczny source by twierdzić, że SOR stanowi iz droga jest jednokierunkowa. Nie sprawdziłeś innych changesetów. Wycofuje twą nieptrawidłową zmianę
eggie (2025-09-22 07:34:38+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

De bushalte stond al op de kaart. Ik heb deze wel iets verplaatst.

MVG
eggie
mgerken (2025-09-22 09:54:53+00:00): Das ist nicht korrekt. Der Zaun ist sowohl vor Ort als auch auf Luftbildern sichtbar gewesen, als ich bezüglich mehrere Notes wegen der Routing-Problematik vor Ort war.

Sollte der Zaun noch dort stehen bitte reverten. Es ist nicht Okay etwas zu löschen, weil dich die Darstellung stört.

Besten Gruß
limes11 (2025-09-22 10:33:53+00:00): Das Problem ist, dass der hw=service näher an der Haustür von Nr. 29 liegt als die Wendestelle von Western. Das hat mir dem Zaun überhaupt nichts zu tun. 

Ich habe jetzt bei Nr. 29 einen Teil des path zu einer Einfahrt gemacht, damit sollte sich das Problem auch lösen.
mgerken (2025-09-22 11:20:57+00:00): Ja, es stellte sich dann auch raus dass die Router sämtliche barrieren dabei völlig außer acht lassen. Trotzdem ist der Zaun halt da...
b-holdet (2025-09-22 08:06:59+00:00): https://penta.dk/vaerd-at-vide/hvem-maa-faerdes-i-privatejede-skove-og-hvornaar/

Der går en fin sti ind her med befæstning og der er sat skilt op ud til vejen. Så man må godt bevæge sig ind i skoven via denne sti.

Hvorfor sletter du stien her?
KKM2021 (2025-09-22 09:54:25+00:00): Den går direkte forbi en lejebolig og Strava og andre henter data fra dette kort for at lægge løbe- og cykelruter, hvilket medfører øget trafik. Vejen er privat men åben efter skovlovens etc. regler.
b-holdet (2025-09-22 11:20:38+00:00): Det kan let løses ved at sætte det sidste stykke ind til nr 3 som Privat i stedet for at slette dem fra kortet.
Stierne på kortet benyttes også i forbindelse med redningsarbejde, så de har et formål, selvom man ikke lige kan se det nu.

Hvor stort er problemet med at der kommer gående og cyklende forbi nr. 3?
KKM2021 (2025-09-22 12:55:58+00:00): ok. har sat den ind igen til nr. 3.
Lostmonkey (2025-09-22 14:26:18+00:00): Se evt også: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
custodiankeyy (2025-09-22 19:53:51+00:00): Eklemiş olduğunuz taxi noktaları gerçek hayatta belirtilen yerlerde bulunuyor mu? Eğer bulunmuyorsa kaldırılmalı. OpenStreetMap'e fiziksel olarak bulunmayan şeyler eklenmemeli diye düşünüyorum.

Bahsettiğim noktalar:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13161539193
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11502767719
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12913063792
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12685511613
hlfan (2025-09-22 20:41:38+00:00): I removed the barrier based on new street-level imagery: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1446559156576290&focus=photo