piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Syl (2025-03-17 15:58:32+00:00): Je ne vais généralement pas aussi loin dans les détails mais quand il en a ajoutés par d'autres et qu'ils sont encore justes j'essaye autant que possible de les garder quand je corrige/met à jour.
Et pour les 3 mètres, je vous invite à regarder les images de rue de Bing, le feu est à plusieurs mètres du passage piéton.

J'avais bien vu le problème du feu déconnecté de la route, c'est pour ça que je vous demandais des précisions uniquement sur le fait d'avoir enlevé des détails en corrigeant. Merci d'avoir fait ces corrections.

Au final le vrai problème de ce groupe de modifications c'est d'avoir marqué un commerce comme fermé en se basant uniquement sur les données de l'INSEE. D'expérience il arrive qu'un commerce change de SIRET sans changer de nom ni d'activité. Et les dates de début/fin des entreprises correspondent très rarement à celles des commerces concernés, ce n'est pas forcément pertinent de les ajouter.
Pour moi c'est une source complémentaire qui a besoin d'être croisée avec d'autres.
Yunan973 (2025-03-22 18:20:22+00:00): Pour beaucoup d'éléments, il existent diverses méthodes pour les représenter : un parking peut être représenté uniquement par une allée de parking, ou mieux avec une surface de parking, ou mieux encore avec une surface générale et des emplacements individuels. Idem pour une rue éclairée, qui peut être représentée uniquement avec l'attribut lit=yes ou avec cet attribut et l'ajout de tous les lampadaires dans la rue.

Les solutions du feux/passage piéton avec un noeud ou avec 2 noeuds sont toutes les 2 correctes. Avoir remplacé 2 noeuds erronés par un seul correct était une solution, préférable à laisser 2 noeuds erronés. J'ai donc amélioré openstreetmap, je ne l'ai pas dégradé, contrairement à ce que tu sembles penser.

Quand au Siret, il semble que la société, ait déménagé au 5 RUE JAVELIN PAGNON, cf https://annuaire-entreprises.data.gouv.fr/entreprise/marion-carlier-marion-carlier-843074659#etablissements et https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2297351193, où se situe un espace de coworking.
Je serais toi j'irai y jetai un oeil (un peu plus difficile pour moi qui suis en Guyane) pour voir si 2 noeuds sont nécessaires ou un seul mais à quel endroit.
Cordialement
Syl (2025-03-22 18:32:29+00:00): Désolé si ma formulation a pu laisser penser que c'était une dégradation, ce n'était effectivement pas le cas. Il y avait juste de l'incompréhension de ma part sur la façon de corriger. Encore une fois merci pour cette correction.

La pépinière est bien toujours ici, je l'avais vérifié sur place en même que le feu et le passage piéton. Je note de passer vérifier l'autre nœud à l'occasion, merci pour le signalement.
Bonne continuation.
aceman444 (2025-03-26 19:53:38+00:00): Hi, there is no entrance at this place, it is on the footway in front of a building.
ScarlettB (2025-03-28 12:41:53+00:00): You're right, there's an entrance for the restaurant, which technically is an entrance into the building, but not the office part. StreetComplete doesn't make this clear, I'll take more care next time when dealing with entrances, thanks!
aceman444 (2025-03-28 20:46:44+00:00): Yes, be the entrance to the restaurant is elsewhere, more to the northeast. This footway goes on top of an underground building part so there is no entrace to it here. StreetComplete probably marked a fake point thinking the footway goes into a building, but that is not true in reality.
ScarlettB (2025-03-28 21:49:35+00:00): Oh, got it, it's that overlap. Okay, that makes it a mistake on my part, should have noticed it's crossing a part of the building that's not there (as in not on that level) physically.
user_5359 (2025-03-06 15:54:10+00:00): Hello! Please use the key waterway (lowercase and no empty space).
eggie (2025-03-06 15:45:35+00:00): Ik heb amenity=ice_cream toegevoegd Dat geeft een symbool van een ijsje.

MVG
eggie
rui228 (2025-03-12 21:24:53+00:00): Que trilho confuso. Podes rever a tua edição?
rui228 (2025-03-18 21:37:40+00:00): Eliminei trilho confuso por não ter tido resposta do editor.
opendcc (2025-04-03 19:50:00+00:00): reviewed
opendcc (2025-05-31 08:31:23+00:00): Vergleiche https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/opendcc/traces/11991809
z.B. gab es in Volkenschwand keine Unterführung. Als Quelle hattest Du survey angegeben - bist Du durch diese Unterführung gefahren?
Sanniu (2025-03-09 10:42:28+00:00): Hi, the newly added way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1365027857 crosses another road - can you connect them for the sake of automatic routing engines?
moshikosh (2025-03-09 11:33:05+00:00): hi
actually, i did not add the way' or it was added by mistake.
i added the secondary road and not the track road. so i do not know anything about the track road.

thanks
Sanniu (2025-03-09 12:18:58+00:00): hi, ok , look bogus - removed them.
DaveF (2025-03-07 11:56:56+00:00): Hi
Why have you split an admin boundary?
Why have you joined a footpath to an admin boundary?
Welshie (2025-03-12 13:35:29+00:00): Because the footpath changes from one council to another ON the boundary, and has different references either side of the boundary. The exact admin boundary is the correct point for the footpath to split
NaufalFarras (2025-03-06 22:09:36+00:00): Hello, is there any reason why you removed the oneway tag in Gedebage Selatan? The road has semipermanent barrier on it, vehicles from the north must take left turn then make a u-turn further east before proceeding toward south.
OurtheCanal (2025-03-10 16:35:38+00:00): Hi NFarras, thank you for providing me with this information. I wasn’t able to identify the semipermanent barrier at the time the edit was performed. After doing some additional research, I can confidently defer to your modifications and knowledge of the area.
VictorIE (2026-07-31 20:18:07+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12638451362/

I'm wondering why this node is tagged bicycle=no. Doing this has the effect of saying that cyclists can't use this section of the N52 and that they need to make a huge detour to travel a short distance e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bicycle&route=53.47012%2C-7.35934%3B53.46169%2C-7.3599

That is obviously incorrect.
Vpr65 (2026-07-31 20:37:32+00:00): Hi Victor

You are correct. 

The N52 is allowed for cycling. 
Looking at it again there appears to be an overlap of the dirt track and the N52. 

The dirt track from memory is behind a locked gate. 

I would be very grateful if you could correct the node on the n52. 

Many thanks
VictorIE (2026-07-31 22:53:02+00:00): I could fix it, but there are more than 1,000 of them (not all by you) across the midlands from Celbridge to Roscommon.

I will have to work out a strategy.
NeisReview (2025-03-06 17:45:05+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
AndersAndersson (2025-03-11 21:37:56+00:00): Hej!
Långviksträsk låter som ett mycket mer sannolikt namn än det du ändrade till. Vad var anledningen till namnbytet?
Jonas_CA (2025-03-12 14:34:15+00:00): "Långviksträsk" är det stora träsket mitt på ön väster om Långvik. Detta är inte en del av Långviksträsk utan en del av Östersjön/Björnöfjärden som är vass och sumpmark.
AndersAndersson (2025-03-12 22:20:42+00:00): Tack för info! Jag tar bort det beskrivande namnet men låter någon med mer kunskap än mig sätta mer beskrivande taggar på typ av våtmark.
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-06 17:17:27+00:00): Thanks for reverting. It would be really helpful if next time you could leave a comment on the reverted CS. That way, we can all stay in the loop about the changes you're making.
Allison P (2025-03-06 17:19:58+00:00): I hear you. This wasn't a revert, though.
TrickyFoxy (2025-03-06 23:11:54+00:00): 👋 Нельзя смотреть на спутниковые снимки сторонних карт :)
TrickyFoxy (2025-03-06 23:13:52+00:00): Смотрите на яндекс.панорамы, там есть панорамы этого района
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-06 18:29:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163297096 where the changeset comment is: remove operator tag from nodes
NeisReview (2025-03-07 06:52:18+00:00): #DataImport

Hi, welcome to OSM!

With this changeset, you've added a significant number of features that appear to share similarities in their tags. Could you please let us know more about the source of your mapping activity? Is this a data import?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks!
NeisReview (2025-03-07 06:52:48+00:00): Ah, sorry, woodpeck.
Sledder (2025-03-07 09:02:36+00:00): This was originally my mistake that i named nodes whit josm. Thanks to woodpeck he repaired it. Now i know how to use filter.
Hufkratzer (2025-03-06 20:25:09+00:00): Hi,
you have added leisure=horse_riding to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39979940, but this building belongs to Club Hippique des Alpes  (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/153093821) which was and is correctly tagged with leisure=horse_riding. To map a small equestrian centre inside of larger one makes no sense to me and is a violation of the one-feature-one-osm-element rule. Maybe you can use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=riding_hall instead.
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2025-03-07 10:22:42+00:00): Thanks! Indeed, StreetComplete didn't give me enough context there. The tag building=riding_hall seems to exactly match here: I'm doing the changes.
Hufkratzer (2025-03-07 22:41:46+00:00): I created https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/6155
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-08 03:08:22+00:00): > StreetComplete

this edit was not made with StreetComplete, it was made with SCEE

SCEE is a fork of StreetComplete that has features usable only by experts, maintained at https://github.com/Helium314/SCEE
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-08 03:09:52+00:00): see also https://github.com/Helium314/SCEE/issues/423
Syl (2025-03-06 22:38:23+00:00): Bonjour, je viens d'enlever la partie publicitaire de la description, ça n'a pas sa place dans OSM, voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:description
Baloo Uriza (2025-03-06 20:24:56+00:00): "Avenue" works better than "Ave" as it removes all potential ambiguity while allowing data consumers to accurately create abbreviations if desirable.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163294982
Baloo Uriza (2025-03-06 21:59:13+00:00): This should use address tags instead of a name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163295019
Matt McCutchen (2025-03-06 17:40:33+00:00): Changing the name of a piece of Castlegate Court to Stonehenge Place was an extrapolation; I'm assuming this was overlooked when Stonehenge Place was first extended east of Castlegate Court.  I confirmed the other name changes from signage.
NeisBot (2025-03-06 18:00:38+00:00): Hi Nothingg, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 92% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163295177
woodpeck (2025-03-06 18:15:28+00:00): Mapper deleted their own nodes. -- @NothingG, your track did not properly connect with the road in two places which I fixed.
NothingG (2025-03-06 18:32:16+00:00): Thanks
NeisReview (2025-03-06 20:00:50+00:00): Thank you for your kind private message, @NothingG.

#HappyMapping
Donut Master 🍩 (2025-03-06 17:45:37+00:00): Sorry about adding this! I forgot to check changeset comments before adding it.
Donut Master 🍩 (2025-03-06 17:49:32+00:00): Please make your changeset comments better. Read and follow this:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
NeisRevert (2025-03-24 12:44:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164030812 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-06 18:29:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163297096 where the changeset comment is: remove operator tag from nodes
woodpeck (2025-03-06 18:30:03+00:00): Hi there Sledder, you have accidentally added an "operator" tag to thousands of nodes (instead of adding it to the ways only). I have removed that tag from the nodes again.
Sledder (2025-03-06 18:42:53+00:00): Holy moly. I tried to change operator name. I'm very sorry about this mistake.
Sledder (2025-03-06 18:58:45+00:00): What im doing wrong in josm? Can you help me?
Sledder (2025-03-06 20:05:17+00:00): I get. I filtered nodes off.
Dimitar155 (2025-03-06 18:25:44+00:00): source: Drone Reporter

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vF8KGIMXXkk

https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/🏪-markets-shops-and-commercial-centers-Пазари-Магазини-и-Търговски-центрове.1566507/page-210?post_id=192382065#post-192382065

(и предните 3 поста от него)
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-06 18:29:29+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 163294652, 163296746.
jbcharron (2025-03-06 21:22:20+00:00): Bonsoir,
Une discussion est en cours sur le forum sur le sujet des adresses, merci de ne pas remplacer les tags contact par addr de plus le code postal et la commune ne sont pas nécessaire, les réutilisateurs peuvent les déterminer a partir des frontières de la commune.
Bonne soirée
Yunan973 (2025-03-10 18:21:40+00:00): Pourrais-je avoir le lien vers la discussion sur le forum ?
jbcharron (2025-03-10 20:39:55+00:00): Le voici https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/il-ne-devrait-en-rester-quun-schema-adresse/31702
Bonne lecture
MatiMatix (2025-03-06 19:02:31+00:00): * Dodatkowe info odnośnie zmian w jednokierunkowych ulicach

- Ulica Słowicza nie kończy się jako jednokierunkowa na skrzyżowaniu z Błońską, tylko na skrzyżowaniu z Helenowską.
- Ulice Miejska oraz Słowicza w miejscu gdzie są jednokierunkowe mają dopuszczenie rowerów w przeciwnym kierunku.
- Ulica Słowicza na skrzyżowaniu z Brwinowską oraz parkingiem nie jest jednokierunkowa. Znak drogi jednokierunkowej jest za wjazdem na parking.
Andrea Del Sarto (2025-03-13 16:12:14+00:00): Ciao Giovanni,

il percorso relativo alla tappa Z27 del Sentiero Italia è già stata inserita, come il percorso 400 e 800; quindi ti chiedo di eliminare questa relazione

cordiali saluti
Andrea
Giovanni Monni (2025-03-13 19:14:08+00:00): Ciao Andrea. Grazie della segnalazione. Mi sa che ho preso un abbaglio. Volevo solo che gli amici escursionisti, che hanno l' APP OsmAnd+ visualizzassero nel palmare, oltre che i Sentieri 400 - 800, visualizzassero anche la Tappa di riferimento. Vedi foto via mail. Se non c'è altra soluzione risolvo subito. Grazie. Buona serata.
Cordiali Saluti
Giovanni
Andrea Del Sarto (2025-03-14 08:36:02+00:00): ciao,
i percorsi vengono già correttamente visualizzati nelle varie applicazioni, tra cui OsmAnd; quindi non c'è nessun motivo di tenerle

grazie
Andrew Chadwick (2025-03-06 23:53:47+00:00): That's a big bounding box for a couple of handrails! Did you mean https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190163932 to be included?

Das ist eine große Begrenzungskiste für ein paar Handläufe. Ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190163932 ein Unfall?
</Google-translate-sorry>
eggie (2025-03-06 21:28:39+00:00): Dag pmwisse.. Volgens mij staat die brievenbus niet hier maar op de kopsekant bij Mariënhof 18
Op de recente luchtfoto van Pdok is die daar ook te zien.

De site van PostNL mag je niet als bron gebruiken. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-06 21:31:59+00:00): De brievenbus heb ik verplaatst naar de juiste locatie.
MVG
eggie
citrula (2025-03-06 20:38:16+00:00): This might be "Hunters Crossing Drive" when fully spelled out. What do you think?
NeisBot (2025-03-06 19:18:38+00:00): Hi kmpoppe_repair, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 80% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 25 highway(s)
- 39 building(s)
- 4 natural(s)
- 2 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163298591
NeisReview (2025-03-06 20:28:40+00:00): 👍 for your private message, Kai!
Should no longer happen.
eggie (2025-03-06 19:49:01+00:00): Dag pmwisse..  In Nederland zetten we geen adresgegevens op de gebouwomtrek. Er is al een adresnode.
Ik pas even wat aan.

MVG
eggie
gurglypipe (2025-03-06 22:15:36+00:00): Heya, thanks for all your edits recently.

I’ve tidied this up a bit in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163304089, since there were some duplicate bank nodes and ATMs here on King Street.

However, there’s also a NatWest on Market Square (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427303001), and that’s the only NatWest branch listed on their website (https://www.natwest.com/search-results/locator/branch.html?sortcode=601621&name=Penrith).

Are there really two branches of NatWest in the centre of Penrith at the moment? Or have they recently moved? Or something else?

I’ve not been in the centre of Penrith for a few months, so can’t remember myself.

Thanks :)
gurglypipe (2025-03-10 16:01:58+00:00): I see from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163444093 that you’ve now removed this NatWest (and kept the one on Market Square). Thanks for fixing that — I assume it’s based on a survey or local knowledge? You can list the sources for your edits in the entry just below the changeset comment, when saving an edit. It helps other mappers know where data has come from and how up to date it is, which helps inform future edits. You can also reply to changeset discussions (like this one) to answer questions or expand on your changeset comments.

Thanks again :)
Baloo Uriza (2025-03-06 22:14:54+00:00): Semi-detached house is what you're looking for with duplexes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163299590
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-06 19:55:37+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11592624993
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1246082075

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rskedgell (2025-03-07 07:56:19+00:00): (Review requested)

Thanks for spotting this and updating the map.

I've made a couple of additional tweaks, including adding highway=crossing nodes where the path intersects the A264 and adding the "!" hazard signs on the carriageway - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163314419

Hopefully the crossing nodes will help the navigation applications which you use will do something useful with the tags on the carriageways (particularly maxspeed=70 mph + expressway=yes). You may have to wait a couple of weeks for their systems to update.
eggie (2025-03-06 21:13:50+00:00): Dag pizzipim   Wat zou dit dan kunnen oplossen. 
Je hoeft hier geen forward of backward toe te voegen, want het is eenrichting.
Wat is het probleem?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-06 21:15:53+00:00): ... of heb je iets aan de afslagbeperkingen veranderd? Ik mis er een paar.
eggie (2025-03-06 21:21:53+00:00): Nee.. afslagbeperkingen kloppen. 
Je hoeft alleen te kijken of een give_way forward of backward moet zijn als er geen eenrichting is zoals op het fietspad.
Gr eggie
pizzapim (2025-03-09 13:07:27+00:00): Hi Eggie, het probleem dat ik zie in Magic Earth is dat sommige rotondes goed werken ("leave the roundabout at the 2nd exit") maar sommige niet ("bear right + turn left", terwijl het gewoon rechtdoor over de rotonde is). Dit was het enige verschil dat ik kon vinden tussen de rotondes die wel werken en niet... Als voorbeeld: de rotonde bij Spierdijk werkt niet goed, maar die bij Wogmeer weer wel. Misschien ligt het wel aan de app.
eggie (2025-03-09 15:59:14+00:00): Hoi... en werkt het nu dan wel?

Gr eggie
mueschel (2025-03-08 13:41:12+00:00): Hi,
is that reverted correctly? This shop node now got completely different tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11655897469/history
Agaric (2025-03-06 20:59:11+00:00): Correction Saint-Porchaire
YomanNH (2025-03-06 21:06:57+00:00): - Czemu zmapowałeś dwa ciągi pieszo-rowerowe obok siebie?
- Czemu droga dla rowerów co chwilę zmienia się z highway=cycleway na highway=path i z powrotem? I tak kilka razy?
Yog Sot (2025-03-06 23:43:45+00:00): po pierwsze były już dwa, po drugie zmapowałem współdzieloną drogę pieszo-rowerową, po trzecie droga dla rowerów jest gdy mamy `bicycle=designated`, a jak jest tylko `yes` to oznacza, że rowery mogą tam poprostu przejeżdżać. 
Na wywód o prawie ruchu drogowego zapraszam na discorda, bo nie chce mi się tego tłumaczyć poraz n-ty, szanuj czas.
YomanNH (2025-03-07 07:19:42+00:00): > były już dwa

No nie bardzo...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356779249/history - to był chodnik, zmieniłeś go na ciąg pieszo-rowerowy

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356779250/history - to była droga dla rowerów, zmieniłeś ją na ciąg pieszo-rowerowy
Yog Sot (2025-03-07 10:49:11+00:00): jak nie bardzo skoro zalinkowałeś właśnie dwie, które zawsze był obok siebie. 
Przypominam ci, że w rzeczywistości drogi to obszar, a nie kreski i w tym obszarze obowiązuja przepisy. 
Kiedy analizujesz jakiś problem, bądz obiektywny. To nie konkurs, który się wygrywa, tylko logiczna układanka w której warto znać zależności.
YomanNH (2025-03-07 11:32:22+00:00): Nie było dwóch ciągów pieszo-rowerowych. Przeczytaj jeszcze raz co napisałem.
tekim (2025-04-02 19:19:09+00:00): The name tag is for the name only, not information as to the status of the trail, e.g. "outdated"
tekim (2025-04-02 19:23:48+00:00): Also, you disconnected the trail from the larger trail & road network (prior to your edit it was connected).  Connectivity is important for routing.
MxxCon (2025-03-06 22:26:43+00:00): Hello.
It is inappropriate to tag the whole building as a business when that business occupies only part of the building.

The description tag must never be used for advertising or promotional purposes. It must be used only for neutral tone description of a given feature.
"keywords" tag is not a thing in OSM and must never be used.
instagram, linkedin, pinterest, youtube, facebook tags must be properly formatted as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:*
image and photo tags must never be used for advertising or promotional imagery. They must show the feature that is being mapped.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163302073
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-10 09:05:41+00:00): Not to mention perhaps the worst thing of all...changeset `source` is Google! (Escalated to DWG for possible further action on this SEO spam ring)
Dartmouthmapmaker (2025-03-11 20:09:02+00:00): You got Relation: 1100815 so clopped up that now unrepairable
Birchell (2025-03-13 16:17:23+00:00): if you didn't butt in and mess with what i had in the first place it wouldn't be. my edits got removed for yours so try again buddy.

im not done with the wilderness area so just hold yourself before blaming others
rohieb (2025-03-11 15:28:38+00:00): Hallo,
bzgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7976293 macht diese Änderung meines Erachtens keinen Sinn: das Gelände ist weder Teil eines Gebäudes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building:part=yes) noch ein öffentlicher Platz (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:place=square). Die restlichen disused:*-Tags zu entfernen ist auch nicht sinnvoll, solange das Gelände keine andere Weiternutzung erhält.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-03-07 11:57:22+00:00): Hi! Please write meaningful changset comments so we can understand what this edit was for. Thanks!