piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tekim (2024-04-06 16:53:54+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149663712
NeisBot (2024-04-07 11:04:05+00:00): Hello KPKiriloff, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
silversurfer83 (2024-04-10 08:26:33+00:00): Hallo nochmal :)

dann währe hier "private" auch die korrekte Wahl.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149646624
Frans S (2024-04-29 10:17:22+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please tag buildings as building=yes. (default for OSM mapping)
Best regards
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-06 09:50:25+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11795165188
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/381788486

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mueschel (2024-04-13 09:05:19+00:00): Hallo,
was meinst du am Brunnen mit dem Tag "trog=yes"?
APneunzehn74 (2024-04-13 10:20:54+00:00): Servus, das ist ein Brunnen Trog aus Granit, das meinte ich damit. 
Im Prinzip ist das so etwas wie ein Laufbrunnen https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laufbrunnen
allerdings mehr zu dekorativen Zwecken, ggf Händewaschen usw.
So wie https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trog_(Beh%C3%A4lter).
Bin noch auf der Findung nach dem passenden taging.
Cipreste (2025-06-14 15:48:27+00:00): o nome anterior estava correto, o centro de saúde inclui mais do que uma USF
NeisBot (2024-04-07 11:04:03+00:00): Hello いjhdいjhd, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
dafelix (2024-04-12 18:06:32+00:00): Der Graf-Rathold-Weg Weg ist sicher falsch (kopiert und verschoben). Bitte korrigieren.
opendcc (2024-04-12 22:00:36+00:00): Done.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:26:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
Frans S (2024-04-25 14:50:24+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped
Buildings not squared
Shadow of building included in mapping.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149649935
joel56dt (2024-04-06 13:14:36+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Let me know if you have any questions about mapping in Vancouver or OSM overall.

- Joel
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:26:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:25:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:23:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-08 12:02:34+00:00): Hello!

Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree".

So for buildings it is not needed to put Building as their name.

Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1270350351 is specifically named with such name?

And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
    
Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.
N1T3R (2024-04-06 21:14:46+00:00): For such a huge changeset, can you split it into multiple uploads in the future?

Changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Have a look at: "Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering.
Leo Slager (2024-04-06 21:35:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Friendly_Ghost (2024-05-16 00:41:23+00:00): Hi. Please don't map railways where they no longer exist. To map historic/removed railways you can go to OpenHistoricalMap instead of OpenStreetMap.
iandees (2024-04-06 12:12:33+00:00): Reverted this changeset due to delete+remap instead of improve

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149652648
fortera_au (2024-05-01 03:39:34+00:00): Hi there, do you know if we have permission to use the TMR State Controlled Network Map as a source? From the looks of it, it's under copyright meaning we'd need explicit permission to use it for OSM edits.
PineappleSkip (2024-05-01 09:46:20+00:00): G’day fortera_au, thanks for pointing this out, and nice to know I’m not alone. My reference to the TMR map was probably overkill, I havent imported the TMR classification or number into OSM, so there is no breach of copyright. I was just trying to explain why I thought it should be reclassified as (IIRC) secondary. Cheers skip
scai (2024-04-07 11:44:51+00:00): Hi,

ich habe diverse Tags bei deinen zwei Zeilen Objekten korrigiert. U.a. waren weder Öffnungszeiten noch URL in einem gültigen Format angegeben.

Schau gerne nochmal drauf.

Grüße
Alex
maro21 (2024-04-07 19:30:03+00:00): Gdzie taka nazwa występuje?
avinet_ua (2024-04-07 20:16:00+00:00): what are you talking about?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:26:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:25:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:25:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:23:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
Lithostatic (2025-08-28 02:29:43+00:00): I'm new here, but I have been studying the area. From documents I found, the tributary to Walnut Creek here is Thomas Run. Zaun Run is the western tributary of Thomas Run. I will try to edit this as I learn how.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:25:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
MenteVagante (2024-04-06 13:28:56+00:00): Soon to open bnb.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:25:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:24:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-21 00:28:53+00:00): Reviewed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149653350
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:25:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-08 16:39:40+00:00): Rather than creating all these areas to try and create holes, creatively, you should use one large are then put holes using mutlipolygon relations.

These sand trap areas will need to be merged.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149653661
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:26:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
matarranyacorrector (2024-04-06 18:19:15+00:00): Según las directrices de etiquetado de la wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas#N%C3%BAcleos_de_poblaci%C3%B3n), esta población se considera 'hamlet':
"Aldea (place=hamlet):
Núcleos de población que, no siendo capital de municipio, no alcanzan los 1000 habitantes: population=* < 1000"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:24:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-10 00:50:05+00:00): This changeset deleted roads and road connections
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149654296
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-10 00:51:05+00:00): resolved in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149798668
umbraosmbr (2024-04-10 01:32:28+00:00): Boa Noite!

Obrigado por resolver e me avisar, deletei esse conjunto de rodovias sem querer, não vi que tinha deletado!

obrigado  por corrigir.

atenciosamente, 

Raphael de Assis 
UMBRAOSM - União dos Mapeadores Brasileiros do Openstreetmap
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2024-04-08 06:46:59+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour l'alerte et la correction

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
Noktoborus (2024-04-11 08:30:19+00:00): Hello!

Please don't make such big edits: localize the changes in one place. In this case, you have made changes in Yerevan, Khachpar, Nshavan with one edit. Don't do that.
Noktoborus (2024-04-11 08:38:21+00:00): please note that you have broken the route relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9575677#map=19/40.19000/44.48060
Noktoborus (2024-04-11 08:46:52+00:00): and this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16895702#map=19/40.19019/44.48046
Noktoborus (2024-04-11 08:50:51+00:00): 
Обратите внимание, что добавил выделенную полосу для движения from Ծիծեռնակաբերդի խճուղի, вы запретили съезд на эту полосу трафику с Լենինգրադյան փողոց с этого отрезка https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164137340 что не является корректным. К тому же, добавив новую полосу Вы не исправили значение lanes= на отрезке https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164137341

Pay attention to the impact that he had on the dedicated area for movement from Tsitsernakaberdsky highway, you banned the exit to this area for transport from Leningradskaya Street from this section https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164137340 which does not appear to be correct. In addition, by adding a lane, you did not manage significant lanes = on the segment https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164137341
Noktoborus (2024-04-11 08:52:33+00:00): Ко всему вышесказанному, по новой схеме получается, что проезд отрезка https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297480269 не имеет штрафа проезда светофора (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10830272932), что так же некорректно.

According to all of the above, according to the new scheme, it happens, which leads to a shutdown https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297480269 there is no traffic light penalty (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10830272932 ), which is so incorrect.
Noktoborus (2024-04-11 08:57:01+00:00): If you change your name=, change name:hy= too, do not delete it.
Noktoborus (2024-04-11 08:58:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/856148997

'Vagharshapat-Hayanist highway' is not 'name:hy', it is 'name:en'
Noktoborus (2024-04-11 09:00:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15752680 что должно быть с этим отношением после Ваших правок?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15752680 what should happen to this attitude after your edits?
Noktoborus (2024-04-14 16:27:43+00:00): Changeset reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388129377

Please, pay attention on 'sidewalk', 'lanes', 'turn:lanes', 'lines:change', 'parking' tags before apply your changes and use smaller area of changes
Noktoborus (2024-04-14 16:28:56+00:00): reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150000555
slice0 (2024-04-06 16:03:29+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/was-changing-the-road-classifications-to-align-with-south-australias-bypass-law-really-an-import/111445 Just asking for public feed back here if you are willing, thankyou
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:23:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
Tomas Straupis (2024-04-06 14:43:04+00:00): Peržiūrėjau. Neries krantu, o ne centru eina šios konkrečiai ribos, na bet gal gerai bus. Kai iki šitos vietos prižygiuosiu - gal ir patikslinsiu krantą ir kitas viršūnes. Kai kurios labai senai suvestos admin ribos ir mano buvo su ribomis patrauktomis nuo kranto į upės centrą.
Audrius Pak (2024-04-06 18:31:56+00:00): Ok, aplink yra nemažai kitų ribų einančių per ašinę liniją. Naujiems stengsiusio žymėti krantą
RicoElectrico (2024-04-23 10:42:02+00:00): wg tej uwagi nie ma: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3970517
szydzio (2024-06-09 14:10:09+00:00): Po sztolni nr 20 w podanej lokalizacji nie ma śladu, przetagowałem jako destroyed w zestawie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152456497 i zamknąłem uwagę.
MartinInTue (2024-04-06 19:07:26+00:00): Guten Abend, mein erster Kommentar bei Openstreetmap, der umgesetzt wurde. Vielen Dank!
Jakob48 (2024-05-01 13:13:57+00:00): Hallo rene78,

weshalb entfernst Du bei abgeschalteten Telefone der Telekom das disused:* Tag?

Es geht um Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4511198084
und auch um Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/565602032 (CS in Meersburg)

Es macht in OSM-Carto keinen Sinn diese öffentliche Telefone anzuzeigen.
Die Telefonzellen sind seit dem 01. Februar 2023 dauerhaft abgeschaltet und funktionieren sowieso nicht mehr. Die werden irgendwann in den nächsten Monaten von einem Sub-Unternehmer der Telekom abgebaut und entsorgt.

Gruß
Jakob48

BTW. siehe Diskussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/anfang-2023-werden-alle-offentlichen-telefone-der-telekom-in-de-abgeschaltet/4712
rene78 (2024-05-01 19:10:34+00:00): Hi Jakob,

das war mir nicht klar. Tut mir Leid. Eben weil sie nicht abgebaut waren dachte ich, dass sie noch im Einsatz sind.

Ich werde diese Änderungen rückgängig machen, sobald ich wieder am Computer bin.

Danke für den Hinweis!

Gruß
Rene
rene78 (2024-05-02 19:21:05+00:00): Erledigt.
Jakob48 (2024-05-03 10:26:32+00:00): Sieht gut, ich danke Dir.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:26:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
mcliquid (2024-04-08 08:47:40+00:00): Kennst du eigentlich schon SCEE (https://github.com/Helium314/SCEE)? Damit kannst du neue POIs ergänzen und auch in vorhandene Wege direkt einfügen.
rene78 (2024-04-10 11:31:31+00:00): Nein, werde ich mir mal anschauen. Benutze unterwegs immer OsmAnd zu editieren. Gibt's aber garantiert elegantere Anwendungen. Danke!
literan (2024-04-08 18:02:39+00:00): building=chapel
ruins=yes

building=ruins  это здание, специально построенное как руина (в парках, например)
sirorezka (2024-04-09 12:58:19+00:00): Спасибо за уточнение. Я постараюсь запомнить это правило. Спасибо!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:25:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
mcliquid (2024-04-08 08:44:01+00:00): Hi, nur als Tipp: Das "area=yes" braucht es bei amenity nie. Schlägt das iD so vor?
rene78 (2024-04-10 11:30:25+00:00): Hi mcliquid, die Darstellung in iD von Fahrradparkplatz-Polygonen ohne "area=yes" ist komisch. Deswegen tu ich dieses Tag noch hinzufügen. Muss ich mir mal abgewöhnen. Ist ja vollkommen egal, wie es im Editor dargestellt wird.
5m4u9 (2024-04-07 05:14:15+00:00): Hola, ese tipo de información privada personal (profesional) no va al mapa.

Estos datos de vuelos de uav's y otros personales úsalos en un mapa personalizado →  https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/
NeisBot (2024-04-06 15:04:03+00:00): Hello mansour almanaa, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
felipeeugenio (2024-04-06 21:30:40+00:00): Hello.
Thanks for the building, they are perfect.
Nevertheless, the roads are dubious: Path is a way where vehicles cannot go, and unclassified is used for minos public roads. Both roads that you mapped are clearly =service and clearly access=private.

regards
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-08 16:36:22+00:00): What are you doing?  Why did you drag these nodes intentionally just for a download?  Damaging data (whether temporary or not) for a download is not permitted on OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149659077
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-17 15:47:17+00:00): Copied private message received from user=jpotas for public discussion:

	
"I merged the sand traps that you messaged me about. I don’t really understand why they had to be merged but I did it anyways. For practical use, the way I had them mapped would work for any commercial application.

As far as ading extra splines, I had to drag a spline from a couple features in order for my software to pick the feature up. I can not explain why this happens but in order to get the features to download as accurately as possible I have to do this. I then immediately correct them, within a matter of a minute.

As a side note, when I finish mapping a course, it is extremely accurate and very useful for anybody that needs the information at a later date. This should be much better than not being mapped at all. I do not understand the “practical” reason for the different conforming issues that OSM admins sometimes have with my mapping. Commercial applications will see two sand traps side by side, they don’t need to have them mapped as one large sand trap. Boundries will match. Please explain and include commercial apllications that are affected if you would please, it would help me understand.

Thank you"


As discussed previously, you should not make changes that damages the OSM dataset just for your renderer or application.  If your software is unable to read and interpret OSM data that conforms to OSM standards, then that is an issue with whatever software you are using.

OSM has guidelines to ensure software (when properly designed) can read data correctly.  Making intentional changes that do not represent reality or mapping with poor quality (partial overlapping, simulated holes, etc.) Is against the OSM guidelines.

You are not the only user of OSM data, and thus the guidelines that are on the Wiki have to be respected.
AgusQui (2024-04-07 23:15:04+00:00): Que estas queriendo mapear? Los subtes ya están mapeados
une abeille (2024-04-18 00:58:52+00:00): "Each parking area feature should be mapped as a contiguous area. [...] Individual parking rows should not be mapped as separate parking areas. To get that level of detail, individual parking spaces can be mapped separately with amenity=parking_space."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking
Fabe56 (2024-04-18 11:49:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150171259
Need improvement to draw more precise parking space and classification since all of them are not the same, mix of motorhome/bus, motorcycle, auto etc.
itineris (2025-07-17 16:26:44+00:00): Szia!

Főútnak csak a hivatalosan ilyennek besorolt, számozott utakat címkézzük.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/F%C5%91%C3%BAt

Üdv:
Ákos
itineris (2024-05-09 14:33:24+00:00): Szia!

Kérlek, legközelebb az utak keresztezésénél rakj le egy közös pontot, illetve a vizek feletti átvezetésnél is címkézd megfelelően vagy a hidat vagy az átereszt!

Köszönöm.
Ákos
Filip009 (2024-04-07 08:03:58+00:00): Zdravím, telefónne čísla je vysoko odporúčané uvádzať v medzinárodnom formáte +421 XXX XXX XXX.
gardenerik (2024-04-07 20:24:45+00:00): Vďaka za upozornenie, opravené.
chris66 (2024-04-07 16:57:42+00:00): Hi,
der Horn-Uhlenweg ist durch Deine Bearbeitung nun leider von der Karte verschwunden...
ulimors (2024-04-07 17:30:09+00:00): Das ist richtig. Als Privatweg möchten wir keinen (Wander-/Radfahr-)Verkehr, zumal wir freilaufende Hunde haben und das "Privat" Schild bisher keine Wirkung gezeigt hat.
Da ich auch nicht anderen Leuten durch den Garten fahre, bitte ich das zu respektieren.
Betroffen ist allerdings tatsächlich "nur" der Abzweig vom Horn-Uhlenweg scharf links Richtung Hof sowie der Zuweg von der anderen Seite (Horn-Hülsberger Str. nach rechts). 
Falls ich da zu viel "gekillt" habe, war das ein Versehen...
ulimors (2024-04-07 18:13:07+00:00): Habs gerade nochmal kontrolliert und es ist m.M.n. korrekt so.
martiensch (2024-04-09 10:33:21+00:00): Het paadje is beklinkerd, niet geasfalteerd.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-04-08 09:16:12+00:00): Hi 1T-money, 
can you explain why you have changed admin_level=5 to admin_level=6 in this changeset, since per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative#10_admin_level_values_for_specific_countries admin_level=5 are Districts (Arrondissements) and admin_level=6 are Search-And-Rescue sectors (temporary).

I think you should revert your changes