piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jrjosephsen (2023-10-20 14:22:13+00:00): Det vil ikke give mening, da den øvrige del af [O3] er Østjyske Motorvej og Djurslandsmotorvejen. https://www.tv2ostjylland.dk/aarhus/rekorddyrt-projekt-endelig-klar-nu-faar-aarhus-en-tredje-ring
osmviborg (2023-10-20 14:32:36+00:00): Er det skiltet ude på motorvejen?
jrjosephsen (2023-10-20 14:35:13+00:00): https://giberringvej.aarhus.dk/nyheder/2020/plan-for-motorvejstilslutning/
osmviborg (2023-10-20 14:38:59+00:00): Er det skiltet?
jrjosephsen (2023-10-20 14:48:23+00:00): Mig bekendt er hverken skiltning fra nord ([E45] <50> Hørning) eller syd ([501] <1> Hasselager V) er blevet skiftet siden åbningen af Giber Ringvej.
Læs eventuelt følgende: https://stiften.dk/aarhus/ny-omfartsvej-har-vaeret-aaben-i-over-to-uger-men-det-er-der-ingen-som-fortaeller-bilister-paa-motorvejen
osmviborg (2023-10-20 14:58:09+00:00): Hvis Torshøjvej ikke er skiltet med O3, så bør OSM ikke være tagget med betegnelsen.
jrjosephsen (2023-10-20 15:30:07+00:00): Så vi skal tagge mod bedre vidende, fordi skiltningen ikke er blevet opdateret?... Så må vi vel hellere ændre Grenåvej i Århus til Primærrute 15...? https://www.google.com/maps/@56.18929,10.2185856,3a,18.7y,118.32h,84.53t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s3jXYyEi6G733jJhS6oEK4A!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu
NorthCrab (2023-10-20 14:20:33+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142873001
emersonveenstra (2023-10-20 15:19:56+00:00): Hi,

I think you accidentally moved this tree: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8412296729

Also, maxspeed needs to go on the road, not on a point
emersonveenstra (2023-10-21 20:26:51+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142939429
NorthCrab (2023-10-20 14:19:53+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142872968
NorthCrab (2023-10-20 14:19:48+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142872964
woodpeck_repair (2023-10-21 14:02:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 142872159 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism in Israel
woodpeck_repair (2023-10-21 14:02:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 142872159 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism in Israel
emersonveenstra (2023-10-20 15:22:55+00:00): Hi,

I don't think these are unclassified roads, the wiki says that unclassified roads are part of the public road network, which these aren't, especially when the wiki page for highway=service says to use it for access to a campsite
NorthCrab (2023-10-20 14:19:03+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142872936
Frans S (2023-10-20 13:59:06+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please focus on roads and buildings. Those are most important.
Best regards and keep mapping
NorthCrab (2023-10-20 14:17:56+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142872890
NorthCrab (2023-10-20 14:16:49+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142872836
NorthCrab (2023-10-20 14:16:46+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142872833
NorthCrab (2023-10-20 14:16:02+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142872807
NorthCrab (2023-10-20 14:15:58+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142872801
NorthCrab (2023-10-20 14:13:08+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142872689
NorthCrab (2023-10-20 14:13:01+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142872684
NorthCrab (2023-10-20 14:12:54+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142872680
pantufla (2024-06-27 09:34:35+00:00): Hello. Please take a look at the wiki on how to make your first contributions. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Getting_Involved or here: https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/
pantufla (2024-06-27 09:55:54+00:00): Most of the changes if not all, don't come with great intention to add value to the data, such as name= "My House" and tag as a palace. Many others are very poor tagged and are hard to correct or make great use of.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153239561
ovruni (2023-10-22 00:05:28+00:00): Hola Gabriel2718, en las instrucciones se indica claramente sobre no eliminar datos previos, por lo que he revertido sus conjuntos de cambios.
Saludos
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-20 14:00:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11271488282
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1217103411

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
zstadler (2023-10-20 14:20:26+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for the revert!

It may be useful to add a "reverted" comment in the discussion of the changeset/s you reverted.

See the comments on the other changeset by this vandal
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/hefiko2692/history
MarcoR (2023-10-21 12:34:59+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!

You did it almost correctly! Just remember that landuse=residential and building=yes usually are associated to different objects (the former should be associated to the area that contains the latter).

Happy mapping,
Marco.
woodpeck_repair (2023-10-21 14:02:55+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 142869558, 142869606, 142869648, 142870013, 142870451, 142870454, 142870463, 142870514, 142870534, 142870544, 142870551, 142870606, 142870637, 142870771, 142870818, 142870831, 142870990, 142871223, 142871232, 142871247, 142871265, 142871282, 142871288, 142871301, 142871382, 142872046.
Metzor (2023-10-20 17:24:52+00:00): Hi GJ692043,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) 

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Frans S (2023-10-21 08:41:17+00:00): Hello Arie. Thanks for mapping here.
A question. Why do you change correct taggings "track"in agriculture fields into 'unclassified'? Please check the rules in the highway wiki.
I change them back to 'track
Best regards
bxl-forever (2023-10-20 21:40:39+00:00): Hello,

Sorry but I had to revert this changeset because it (really) broke too many things.  It is a complicated intersection and when you pushed or cut roads it broke bus routes continuity and cycle relations too.

As an alternative to the issue we talked about earlier this week, a quick workaround can be to add a small connector to cut the corner without going to the centre of the intersection.  This might be a small improvement.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1217185327

My first idea was to draw the two directions of the road as separate roads, but it will probably make the main intersection even messier.  I fear there is no good solution here…
ollegol (2023-10-21 09:55:38+00:00): Yes, the small connector seems to me a good idea. It's a lot simpler and functional. Thx for having checked this quite complicated intersection
philippec (2023-10-20 17:21:47+00:00): Het is goed dat je de mapillary toevoegt.  Enkele overlappende foto's zijn beter.
Neem van mijn aan dat de url vorm voor de mapillary key beter is.
osm_av (2023-10-21 08:42:09+00:00): Bedoelt u dan dat in plaats van bijvoorbeeld "mapillary=869566331136483", "mapillary=https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=869566331136483" beter is?
philippec (2023-10-21 08:43:45+00:00): ja
philippec (2023-10-21 08:45:19+00:00): Maar toch liever met de focus op de foto 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=869566331136483&lat=50.8760028&lng=3.4116361&z=1.5&focus=photo
TelsiuurajonoosvaivlTtllti24ii2 (2023-10-20 17:08:29+00:00): Fake change.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142880094
Enock4seth (2023-10-21 08:26:06+00:00): What are you trying to map here? "building" should be used for representing the footprint of buldings. 
Please use a changeset comment that is useful to yourself and other mappers instead of just some hashtag that says nothing.
nurdafur (2024-12-23 09:54:41+00:00): Hallo Riker360
Du hast hier eine Rundwanderung ergänzt. Ich bin letzte Woche entlang der Bahnlinie durch Rinkerode geradelt. Dabei sind mir keine Markierungen für diese Runde aufgefallen. Kannst du dich erinnern, wie das markiert ist. Eventuell noch das symbol und osmc:symbol-tag ergänzen.
Unmarkierte Routen gehören nicht in OSM.
Liebe Grüße und schöne Festtage 
Urs
Riker360 (2024-12-24 12:11:29+00:00): Hallo Urs,
an mindestens zwei Stellen des Weges sind hinter Plexiglas Karten mit dem Weg und der Abkürzung angebracht. Eines hatte ich damals an der Einmündung Albersloher Straße bei Auto Pieper fotografiert.
nurdafur (2024-12-24 13:02:29+00:00): Danken! Dann schau ich da nochmals, wenn ich das nächste mal in Rinkerode bin.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-19 10:44:14+00:00): Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4119274 ?
pantufla (2024-06-27 09:55:55+00:00): Most of the changes if not all, don't come with great intention to add value to the data, such as name= "My House" and tag as a palace. Many others are very poor tagged and are hard to correct or make great use of.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153239561
Jakka (2023-10-20 16:02:44+00:00): pas connecter hedge au "name"="La Princesse" "waterway"="stream"
mapperue (2024-01-03 13:17:22+00:00): Čo znamenajú otváracie hodiny "Mo-Fr do 12:00"?
Langlaeufer (2023-10-20 22:02:32+00:00): Hi Zaunhäger.
Hauptstraße mit Paving Stones? Sieht nach Asphalt aus.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142876377
Zaunhänger (2023-10-21 18:14:12+00:00): Ups, ja ist Asphalt. Sorry, da habe ich mich verklickt. Danke für den Hinweis.

MfG
Enock4seth (2023-10-21 08:50:52+00:00): If you have no idea what something is looking like don't just assume and map whatever you feel it is. This is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1217131536 no farmyard.
Enock4seth (2023-10-21 08:52:24+00:00): Don't map island ways that connects to nowhere or nearest ways eg. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1217131547
map per (2023-10-21 19:25:48+00:00): Hallo Tourist Information Eichstätt,

dieser Weg (1) war ein Fußweg bis ihr 'highway=footway' gelöscht habt. War das so gewollt? Gibt es dort keinen Fußweg mehr?

Viele Grüße
map per


(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/137554094
rhtb0 (2023-10-21 08:45:59+00:00): 안녕하세요.
기여에 감사드리지만 한가지 유의할 점이 있습니다.
이름 칸에는 이름만 적고 그 지물이 무엇인지 부가설명을 하기 위해 사용하지 않는다.
name(이름) 태그에는 괄호 등으로 범주, 유형, 설명, 주소, 참고 사항("20xx년 완공 예정", "개교 예정", "입주 예정", 공사중, 공사 예정, 설계중, n년 예정, (예정), (20xx. 04) 등)과 같은 부가 정보를 포함하지 않습니다. 개통 정보는 opening_date, 다른 이름은 alt_name 태그를 활용하시기 바랍니다. 
name 태그에 "공사중", "예정" 같은 이름을 넣는다고 해서 그 지물이 공사가 진행하고 있다는 것들이 지도에 반영되지 않습니다.
rhtb0 (2023-10-21 08:46:42+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:%EC%9D%B4%EB%A6%84
여기를 참고해 주시기 바랍니다. 
감사합니다.
infeeeee (2024-04-23 13:46:27+00:00): Szia! Ez a szobor micsoda? Neten nem találok róla semmi infót, forrást nem adtál meg. Mi a hivatalos neve, gondolom nem "a szeletelt szobor", így kisbetűvel? Esetleg fotód van róla? Köszi!
grozsa11 (2024-04-23 15:01:39+00:00): Szia! Bocs, csakugyan a name-ben maradt a leírás. Most a köztérképről utána néztem a címének és alkotójának. Ott fotók is vannak róla. 
https://www.kozterkep.hu/47979/katekezis
Köszi, hogy jelezted, így rendbetettem.
A forrás-ba betehetema  köztérképes linket gond nélkül, ugye?
infeeeee (2024-04-23 15:36:47+00:00): ref:kozterkep címkébe kellene a köztérképes id-t használni, jogi tudnivalókat is összeszedtem itt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref:kozterkep
osmviborg (2023-10-21 17:56:03+00:00): 'crossing=informal' er uden 'highway=crossing'
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing%3Dinformal
Niels GM (2023-10-21 20:40:46+00:00): Tak for feedback. Så det skal bare være et Point med 'crossing=informal'?
osmviborg (2023-10-22 08:32:13+00:00): 👍
Strubbl (2023-10-21 20:50:32+00:00): hier auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/631360457
Filip009 (2023-10-24 14:31:59+00:00): Dobrý deň, adresa nie je názvom domu.
Alisherafati (2023-10-20 16:32:46+00:00): اضافه کردن پت شاپ لی پت
arjunaraoc (2023-12-12 13:22:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Error was fixed vide https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144055925#map=16/16.4620/80.4515
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142879285
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-21 23:36:35+00:00): Czyli w https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2901310397/history nie ma sprzedaży detalicznej chleba czy innych?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-21 23:37:45+00:00): a, w https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3946513 jest
uprkos (2023-10-22 08:24:24+00:00): Nie ma, szyld został usunięty, wisi informacja, że sprzedaż odbywa się w sklepie firmowym na Ruczaju. W tym budynku mieści się tylko produkcja.
segubi (2024-07-13 10:08:45+00:00): You marked the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37571538 with access=no which implies the impression that the way is generally inaccessible e.g. by destruction. If it's just an exclusion of vehicles it is redundant at the moment and it would be better just to tag the other restrictions. (vehic=no, bicycle=no etc.). Interesting for me as pedestrian now: Is the passage possible? See wiki ("If only specific transport modes are forbidden, for example, at a vehicle no-entry sign, use a more specific restriction like vehicle=no or motor_vehicle=no over the general key access.", https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#List_of_possible_values
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-10-21 08:50:37+00:00): Hi houserca, 
I dont think it it is a good way to map coastline where it is actually a river. 
The natural=coastline tag is used to mark the mean high-water springs line along the coastline at the edge of the sea.

It is not used for lakes and rivers.

Can you remove Hackensack River coastline that you have added, also some other rivers nearby?
houserca (2023-10-22 05:36:07+00:00): Noted. I have removed all the coastlines I created on Hackensack and surrounding. Should the pre-existing coastline on Hackensack be deleted also?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461982097
emersonveenstra (2023-10-21 21:42:38+00:00): Hi,

What does "marked as proposed" mean in this context?
Andrew Olson (2023-10-22 02:53:18+00:00): This means that I am pretty sure this is where the route is going to go.  If not, feel free to correct it.
Andrew Olson (2023-10-22 02:54:52+00:00): I thought it would be better to keep it proposed instead of marking it as there.
stevea (2024-03-24 14:19:34+00:00): This is not how we use the state=proposed tag for national-level bicycle routes in the USA.  Please see our https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_Bicycle_Route_System for "the national system" and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Bicycle_Networks for how we tag bicycle routes in general (national, regional, local) in the USA.

The tag (really, the entire relation) should be removed unless you can point to what our wiki calls "a serious statewide effort to create such a route."  As someone fairly plugged into how this is done, I sincerely doubt this, but I am listening.  Not answering means the ncn tag (and possibly route relation) will be removed.
Andrew Olson (2024-03-24 14:37:03+00:00): Sounds good.  Feel free to remove it as you please.
stevea (2024-03-24 18:15:44+00:00): Well, not so fast...I mean it's likely I will remove it given your response.  However, I offer you an explanation for where these data came from, and/or what makes / made you think "I am pretty sure this is where the route is going to go."  Really, I'm listening.
stevea (2024-03-24 18:16:33+00:00): Oops, I offer you an opportunity for explanation.  I'm curious where these route data (especially that they are "Route 8 in the USBRS") came from.
Andrew Olson (2024-03-24 18:21:41+00:00): TBH, I added it based on a rough map I saw, not on concrete evidence.
stevea (2024-03-24 18:23:55+00:00): OK, that's helpful.  Thank you.
gscholz (2023-10-23 07:16:26+00:00): Hi Naya Kabir,
your recent edits have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=23.24987&lat=58.57184&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this? You may also like to rethink your edit process as this seems to be a systematical error while connecting two ways together.
Kind regards
Guido
dgmapping (2023-10-23 14:56:05+00:00): Hi Guido,
I've noticed that you, or your bot script, have been fixing this duplicate node issue for Naya Kabir edits for quite long time.

Could it be that is caused by a bug in Go Map?
https://github.com/bryceco/GoMap/issues/206

Have you noticed similar issues with other Go Map changesets?
gscholz (2023-10-24 06:51:17+00:00): Hi  dgmapping,
this may well be the case, but there are a lot of duplicate nodes caused by ID users as well. My fixes are hand made (not bot) so to say.
Guido
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-10-27 16:10:56+00:00): Are those nodes on places where two ways should be connected, but aren't? I remember fixing many such errors after Naya Kabir or his previous account a year or so ago.
gscholz (2023-10-27 16:46:24+00:00): The ways are connected but the new way gets a doubled node at the start.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-10-27 16:49:22+00:00): Right. It's the same issue. iD draws unconnected white node at the top, that's why I thought that ways aren't connected.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-10-27 16:57:28+00:00): This may be related https://github.com/bryceco/GoMap/issues/206
dgmapping (2023-10-27 16:58:31+00:00): It's just two nodes with same location, both connected to a way. Current version of iD suggest merging these node when editing:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11291352728
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11291333520
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-10-27 17:25:01+00:00): Only one of the nodes is connected to both highways, that's what I meant.
kpv8 (2023-10-20 18:00:45+00:00): Stop vandalising bordertripoint, name is not only for Ukrainians.
⇄ john paul jones & gringo (2024-03-04 11:39:34+00:00): Hello jordan8396, You appear to have changed the access for the North Wall for cycles and pedestrians to:
bicycle=destination
foot=designated. 

May I ask why, seeing as this route is designated as a Public Bridleway I would have thought this was better
bicycle=yes
foot=yes.
Dimacn (2023-10-20 20:23:46+00:00): Прекратите делать вандальные правки. Карта OSM - это не место для тренировок и обучения! Карта OSM содержит реальные объекты. Зачем вы удалили здание Салмышская 45/3 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413397552  и пристройку Салмышская 47А - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311010661 ? Зачем меняете геометрию зданий? Зачем добавляете несуществующие объекты? Ваши правки будут отменены.
Dimacn (2023-10-21 11:36:49+00:00): Пожалуйста используйте спутниковые снимки Esri, они намного новее чем Bing, которые использовали вы. Esri более актуальны, возможно поэтому вы удаляете существующие объекты.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 02:44:38+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142904747
user_1566574 (2023-10-24 22:42:01+00:00): Hello ! Je vois(1) que tu utilises JOSM, et que tu supprime/crée beaucoup de nœuds sur une zone proche. Tu pourrais apprécier l'outil accessible au raccourci clavier "W". Également, il me semble que de tracer avec une telle précision les délimitations forestières est une pratique contestée, tellement elle est consommatrice en nœud pour un résultat qui change selon l'imagerie. Dit sans méchanceté, et en appréciant cette effort de contribution, merci ! ;)

1. https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=142884845#16/46.9445/6.2108
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-10-31 20:08:00+00:00): مرحبا بك، هذه الخريطة عامة ولا يسمح بوضع الأماكن الشخصية والخاصة فيها
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 02:44:33+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142904745
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-19 15:58:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/554533381  what you mean by width=0 here?
user_10799485 (2023-11-19 16:30:46+00:00): ??? Reden Sie DEUTSCH mit mir!!!
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-03 15:48:20+00:00): for reference, I opened https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/what-width-0-can-mean-here/106666

(I cannot speak German at all, found this place while investigating some suspicious tagging)
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-03 15:49:31+00:00): Note that forum has globe button that tries to autotranslate to languages including German.
mmd (2023-12-03 15:52:12+00:00): Hallo, Der Wilderer. Die Frage von Mateusz bezog sich auf den Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/554533381: dort ist ein Tag width=0 zu finden, wobei nicht ganz klar ist, was damit gemeint war.
mcliquid (2023-12-03 15:52:14+00:00): Hallo Der Wilderer,
gerne übernehme ich die Kommunikation in deutscher Sprache. Die Frage war, was du mit der Angabe "width=0" an einem "barrier=bollard" ausdrücken möchtest. In der Praxis kann man sich diese Kombination nicht vorstellen. Sind die Poller hier so dicht gesetzt, dass dazwischen tatsächlich kein Zentimeter mehr Platz ist um hier zu passieren?
Oder ist das Maß auf den Poller selbst bezogen und der Pfahl ist hier 0cm weit?

Ich freue mich über eine kurze Erläuterung dazu. Vielen Dank dir und einen schönen Sonntag.
woodpeck (2023-12-04 09:45:44+00:00): @Der Wilderer, ich verstehe ja Deine Frustration, wenn Leute Dich in einer Dir nicht verständlichen Sprache anquatschen. Trotzdem ist "??? Reden Sie DEUTSCH mit mir!!!" nur minimal freundlicher als der Ton, für den ich Dir in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87862728 eine Sperre angedroht habe. Vorschlag: Verwende künftig den Textbaustein "Dear <BENUTZERNAME>, unfortunately I do not understand your comment. Would it be possible to translate it to German for me?" - das ist zwar immer noch ein bisschen bockig (Du könntest ja auch selber einen Onine-Übersetzer nutzen, sagst damit aber, dass Du dazu nicht bereit bist), aber noch im tolerierbaren Bereich der Bockigkeit ;)
user_10799485 (2023-12-04 13:22:00+00:00): @woodpeck: Was heißt hier Bockigkeit? Ich habe das durch dem Google Übersetzer gejagt. Wenn selbst der da nicht mit fertig wird. Und folgendes macht: Was meinst du hier mit width=0? Ich weiß nicht   was "width", heißt. Da kann ich nichts mit anfangen.
silversurfer83 (2023-10-21 15:18:49+00:00): Hi sschmi129 :)

nur eine freundliche Bitte, da deine Änderungen häufiger durch meinen QS-Feed laufen: Wäre super, wenn du entsprechend dieses Artikels im Wiki einmal über deine CS-Kommentare nachdenken könntest:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Weiter happy mapping :)

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142886904
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-20 19:00:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1217178379

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 02:44:29+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142904742