piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Taya_S (2024-07-05 18:24:38+00:00): Hallo Rodejong,

Ik heb naar je edits gekeken en ik heb een paar opmerkingen.

Ik zie dat je heel erg veel Scrub hebt toegevoegd dat voor zover ik kan zien beter als gras gemapped kan worden. Dit kun je gewoon als landuse=gras taggen en niet als scrub.

Verder zie ik ook dat een boel van je scrub overlapt met farmland, dat is ook niet correct. 

Tot slot zie ik dat je in meerdere edits 1 van de outers van NP de Duinen van Texel aanraakt. Dit soort gebieden zijn wettelijk bepaald en niet gebonden aan wat fysiek op de grond aanwezig is, dus het beste kun je deze niet aanpassen.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Taya Snijder
Rodejong (2024-07-19 13:37:21+00:00): De scrub past beter bij sloten en gebieden met oneven grondgebied waar er gemixte planten groeien maar ook zandverstuiving plaatsvindt etc. 
Gras gebieden zijn meer egaal en effen verdeeld over het gebied.
Taya_S (2024-07-19 13:49:20+00:00): Scrub word gebruikt voor houtachtige planten die groter zijn dan heide en kleiner dan bomen. Je kunt hier meer over lezen op de OSM wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=scrub (Ook word dit in nederland gebruikt voor duingebieden. )
Lang gras tussen weilanden zal geen scrub zijn. Dit is beter getagged als natural=grassland of landuse=gras.

Hier overlapt de scrub die je hebt toegevoegd met de weilanden. Dit is incorrect. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299344900
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/108943798
Ga jij dit ook nog fixen?
APneunzehn74 (2024-12-23 17:34:49+00:00): Hello, you have entered an art gallery here? Is that OK? or should it be something else?
Greetings APneunzehn74
Jrachi (2024-09-23 08:31:21+00:00): Ciao.
Sulla chiesa valdese di San Martino hai inserito il wikidata della chiesa valdese di Perrero.
Sto anche cercando di capire quale sia la taggatura corretta dei templi valdesi.
church o temple?
per la denomination invece credo sia più corretto waldensian.

Ivo
empty_child (2024-07-05 19:51:55+00:00): These changesets were reverted due to repetitive vandalism against Azerbaijanis toponyms. Keep in mind, that a claim against you was sent to the DWG

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153602734
CRCulver (2024-07-08 06:17:56+00:00): You restored spurious name tags to the park along Universitet bulvari in Samarkand:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4596554/history

I have deleted them again in changeset 153687537. For one, name= tags in Uzbekistan should be the Uzbek-language name, not English ones. Secondly, while I did a personal survey of this area, I was unable to verify that the park itself (as opposed to the surrounding road) has any such name.
literan (2024-07-07 11:32:40+00:00): вы упорно проставляете адреса в неверном формате, несмотря на просьбы. Зачем вы это делаете?
НинаКостылева (2024-07-07 13:40:31+00:00): Здравствуйте. Извините, исправлю. Просто в профит залили в таком формате задания, упустила и недоглядела.
itsbrody (2024-07-05 19:55:19+00:00): wird die Änderung automatisch in den Standard übernommen, obwohl ich auf einer anderen Imagery sie eingearbeitet habe?
pavvv (2024-07-06 20:20:58+00:00): Zamiast shop=repair lepiej jest użyć craft=electronics_repair i dodać niektóre tagi opisane tutaj: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:craft%3Delectronics_repair
W tagu phone na początku powinno się dodać +48.
Tag description powinien być użyty do opisu obiektu, a nie opisu usługi. W tym przypadku powinno się go usunąć.
Ceigon (2024-07-06 21:24:09+00:00): Dziękuję za podpowiedz.
cesarep (2024-07-05 19:53:46+00:00): Agradecimentos especiais a Gustavo Henrique Lopes pela foto aérea via drone utilizada para melhor alinhamento
https://www.instagram.com/reel/C9DUKhbvF_TGWXXlQpy1JfyMlRTMLQmBPSCZ2w0
Andrew Chadwick (2024-07-06 12:00:20+00:00): So they've started demolishing it, have they? Thanks for the update!

I've dropped a couple of notes to remind me to fix the 400/U1 bus route relation, and retag/relabel the old campus grounds when it all kicks off properly.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/51.7499/-1.1308&layers=N

Feedback welcome, if you know the area!
potatoturkey (2024-07-06 20:31:31+00:00): Unfortunately, I do not know the area very well and has this route/gate planned in a cycle tour between Headington and London…
Kalepom (2024-08-29 23:28:27+00:00): Salut Popolon, 
Est-ce que tu as un peu plus de détails concernant ce panneau de pub https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12036502611 que tu as ajouté. Les images de terrain disponibles ne me permettent pas de le retrouver pour améliorer les tags
Merci
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-09 10:01:16+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12036431625/history has amenity = convenience that was added in this edit
What was meant by amenity=convenience? Is it a convenience shop? Then shop=convenience is likely a better tagging, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dconvenience .
mcliquid (2024-07-06 09:39:25+00:00): Hallo, bitte beachte, dass es bei der Frage "Ist es Fußgängern verboten, auf dieser Straße ohne Bürgersteig zu gehen?" nicht darum geht, ob es physisch möglich ist, sondern ob es durch ein Schild verboten ist. Das ist hier nicht der Fall.
Phil mac Map (2024-07-08 20:17:11+00:00): Danke für die Info!
Werde es zukünftig so handhaben
Spearfish7424 (2024-07-05 20:31:43+00:00): Hello, 

Please don't copy from Google Maps, as it is copyrighted material that we do not have permission to use. 

For an explanation, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google .

I reverted your change here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153603756 .

Thank you!
opiation (2024-07-05 20:44:29+00:00): Understandable. For reference, what I used is the approximate location though I was there myself and the title (Kids playground (5 years to 12 years old)). The description I wrote myself.
goedegazelle (2024-07-06 10:29:12+00:00): Een webshop wordt anders getagd dan een fysieke winkel aangezien de klant er niet terecht kan. Ik heb de webshop aangepast en op de bijbehorende adresknoop gezet.

Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153617890
empty_child (2024-07-06 08:13:11+00:00): Solo or BoG?
mbar22 (2024-07-09 22:13:57+00:00): BoG
mariotomo (2024-07-08 07:04:56+00:00): hola, bienvenido a OSM! que bien que puedas añadir información por observación directa. 
no se te olvide revisar el Wiki para sacar ideas de como maximizar tu impacto sobre el mapa.
por ejemplo, del wiki sobre "amenity=fuel": las combinaciones útiles 
    addr=*
    name=*
    brand=*
    fuel=*
    opening_hours=*
    operator=*
    payment:*=*
    phone=*
    website=*
    capacity=*
    self_service=*
    maxheight=*
ARKVS (2024-07-08 13:58:28+00:00): Edité algunos datos
mariotomo (2024-07-09 05:55:29+00:00): opening_hours
¡muy útil!
ivanbranco (2024-07-05 21:17:23+00:00): Hi Max,

a little tip: when an area or closed line is selected, press "Q" on your keyboard to square the corners.
KingKratos (2024-08-05 16:56:06+00:00): Yep
Leo Slager (2024-07-08 22:41:41+00:00): Ongetwijfeld goed bedoeld maar je hebt nu een tuin over het gebouw gelegd.
Dat kan natuurlijk niet.
De inner zonder tags had verwijderd moeten worden en het gebouw had een inner van de mp moeten worden.

ik pas het aan.
Leo Slager (2024-07-08 22:56:09+00:00): En dat kan niet omdat de 2 gebouwen elkaar raken.
Dus is er een inner (zonder tags) door de oorspronkelijke mapper om de beide gebouwen getekend, die als inner functioneert en dat is correct.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-05 21:20:27+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12036041267

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
busnotturno95 (2024-07-05 21:59:38+00:00): Posizionate le fermate "MUGGIÒ Trieste/Libertà", "MUGGIÒ Edison/Padova", "MUGGIÒ Edison/Libertà", "MUGGIÒ Libertà/Carati"; ripristinato il percorso della linea z203 in direzione Muggiò, interrotto alla rotonda tra via Giuseppe Mazzini e Via Cesare Abba, fino al capolinea; prolungate le relazioni di andata e di ritorno della linea z227 fino a Muggiò.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-05 22:20:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12036733202

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ssundell (2024-07-08 08:13:41+00:00): Kiitos korjauksesta tuolla Ketunleivänkadulla. En tiedä, miten on tullut merkkejä katsottua, kun olen tuon use_sidepathin pyörälle laittanut...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153606474
zzptichka (2024-07-05 22:42:10+00:00): Hi, as far as I understand tag "amenity=police" should be used for public-facing facilities (hence "amenity"): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpolice

Which makes sense, i.e. someone mugged me, so I look up where is the nearest police station and head there.  I don't think you can come to RCMP headquarters if you want to report something. 

This looks more like `landuse=institutional` or `landuse=commercial` with maybe some `police=*` tags.
lastingdiscovery (2024-07-15 02:18:25+00:00): Hey zzptichka! Thanks for the feedback. I'm still learning. 

I changed the feature type to government office with a "police=offices", based on my research. Thanks again!
tyfi (2024-07-05 22:31:12+00:00): A driveway is not a track. No matter how much it may look like one, it is nothing more than an unpaved driveway.
NeisBot (2024-07-05 22:34:38+00:00): Hi pogo100606, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1299385827

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
Taya_S (2024-07-06 08:33:27+00:00): reverted fake pogo beach

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153614497
NieWnen (2024-07-06 15:31:29+00:00): Psujesz adresy....
Lepiej nie zmieniać jak masz takie zmiany robić!
NieWnen (2024-07-06 15:36:26+00:00): Nawet nie patrzysz co jest w innych tagach...
NieWnen (2024-07-06 15:37:28+00:00): I robisz literówki w nazwach ulic.
Barroszt (2024-07-08 14:28:45+00:00): Proszę zapoznać się z artykułem OpenStreetMap Wiki, który znajduje się między innymi w opisie tego zestawu zmian, w której przedstawiono zasady na temat nazw ulic, które obowiązują w Polsce.
Barroszt (2024-07-08 14:29:21+00:00): Cytując: "W przypadku ulic, gdzie oficjalna nazwa zawiera tylko nazwisko, należy dodać imię."
SomeoneElse (2024-07-08 15:04:59+00:00): Hello Barroszt,
To be clear (as noted at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16391 ) part of the problem is that people think that you are changing some things and missing others.
Perhaps avoid doing large-scale "mechanical" edits for a while and survey new stuff?
Best Regards,
Andy
NieWnen (2024-07-08 18:32:16+00:00): @Barroszt twój komentarz jest nie na temat.

Nie pisałem tu nic o samym dodawaniu imienia do ulicy, niemniej ucinasz bardzo istotny fragment jakim jest:

"Należy upewnić się, czy aby na pewno dodajemy właściwe imię"

i nie przekonasz mnie, że się upewniasz patrząc na to co się stało choćby w tej zmianie.

Natomiast co do moich poprzednich uwag, to zachęcam do przeczytania ich ponownie i zaprzestania masowych zmian na ślepo, gdzie nic nie sprawdzasz, bo psujesz tylko dane:
- psujesz adresy, nazwy ulic między adresami, a ulicami muszą być zgodne
- ignorujesz inne tagi, czasem je duplikując, nazwa może być inna z wielu powodów
- dokonujesz akurat kontrowersyjnych zmian o których na wiki za wiele nie ma i to na stronie do której nawiązujesz
- dokonujesz masowych zmian, które nie są poprawą oczywistych błędów, a w dodatku nie posiadasz do niej wiedzy lokalnej, a przedyskutowałeś tego ze społecznością
NieWnen (2024-07-08 18:33:11+00:00): *nie przedyskutowałeś
mcliquid (2024-07-06 10:24:42+00:00): Ich lass die "demolished" Sachen immer gerne drin solange die ursprünglichen Objekte noch in den Luftbildern sichtbar sind.
ChrisFromRV (2024-07-06 12:51:45+00:00): Ich lösche sie meistens raus, sobald ein neues Gebäude "darübergebaut" wurde. Das mit den Luftbildern kann ja manchmal schon etwas länger dauern. Zwei der vier Gebäude sind ja eh nicht mehr zu sehen.
tyfi (2024-07-05 23:37:55+00:00): Addresses note #4314944
eerib (2024-07-06 00:03:12+00:00): The road here is on municipal property, is signed, but is not actively maintained by the City of Chilliwack.
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-06 10:15:21+00:00): Hello zerotoe, welcome to OSM!

I have some reservations about mapping #strava features in OSM. 

Does anyone have relevant experience or opinions on this?
zerotoe (2024-07-07 01:27:14+00:00): Hi pitscheplatsch, 

I asked this questions myself in the forums and the response was  "If the information you have determined is relevant to the public and can be verified on the ground and there is a corresponding tagging for it, there is no reason not to enter this into the global OSM database"

I would like to identify the locations that people surf at, which means that a location that has breaking waves regularly is due to the formation of the land below.

I don't mind doing this privately either ( i just had trouble getting the strava heatmaps to overlay on a private uMap instance.
tyfi (2024-07-06 00:01:40+00:00): This expands on my prior changeset which removed a false "Perry County Road" name from the easternmost portion of the driveway. I decided to work on the entire driveway in a separate changeset after reviewing the changes.
eerib (2024-07-06 00:18:50+00:00): Amendments are in CS#153607928 and include changing the road to a private driveway and adding connected branching private driveways.
KTim (2025-03-16 22:50:53+00:00): Hi dgitto,

I saw you deleted two historical Tour de France route relations, and I agree those were rightly removed. However, you also removed a current bike route that's clearly signposted (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=477920375137276). I've restored that relation.

In the future, please check in with the local community before deleting stuff—especially in areas you don't usually map.

Greetings,
Tim
dgitto (2025-03-17 01:52:39+00:00): Ok, sorry
eerib (2024-07-06 00:28:58+00:00): Amendments are in CS#153608009 and include removing the street name, adding operator details, and aligning to aerial imagery.
Jonathan Ng@ (2024-07-06 01:16:01+00:00): 高州老乡喔
gurglypipe (2024-07-06 16:47:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM. If you’re going to add lots of houses, please use the ‘Q’ key to square up their corners when adding them. It makes drawing regular buildings a lot easier! Ta
Udarian (2024-07-06 05:13:03+00:00): A few notes here:

First of all according to taginfo “bicycle=not specified” isn’t used often if not at all so a different tag would be preferable. From my understanding of how this was tagged it seams to me that “bicycle=not specified” would have the same meaning as “bicycle=customers” since when there isn’t a sign specifying that a certain mode of transportation has different access on a section of road or sidewalk it is implied that it is the default and since this is a (I assume) only for customers (since its in a cemetery) it would be “bicycle=customers”. As a small note since “bicycle=customers” would be the default on the way “bicycle=customers” probably shouldn’t be added since it would be implied. 

Second off all, on secondary roads going into highways (in this case HEFT) bicycle=no is implied so shouldn’t be added.
rskedgell (2024-07-06 14:24:19+00:00): Do you have permission from the architect to use this information in OpenStreetMap under a compatible licence?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright
Max Lyth (2024-07-08 16:27:37+00:00): To clarify, I don't have a set of blueprints or plan to trace but I have seen models and artist impressions of future plans that have been cross-referenced from GPS traces obtained by walking public spaces.
Having visited and instrumented the space I believe the adjustments made to existing building outlines and projections about future construction are a much better representation
Max Lyth (2024-07-08 16:33:56+00:00): The master plan was part of the GLA White City development plan and a wooden model was created to support that. This model is now displayed as public art in a public space and was photo of it was used as supporting evidence of changes to map:
https://share.icloud.com/photos/03eYs1AzcXvRggjA7fOlZ_xew
Max Lyth (2024-07-08 16:59:28+00:00): This is just my first pass and I am aware there are shortcomings in some of my GPS traces, especially around the boundaries of 1 Wood Crescent, the sky obscured inner spaces and the southern buildings for Phase 2 are missing. I will be revisiting with a laser range finder.
okadatsuneo (2024-07-06 06:18:47+00:00): pseekさん、こんにちは。
前のコメントで「了解しました」と書いているにもかかわらず、相変わらず丁目をaddr:quarterとaddr:neighbourhoodに分割していますね。
意図が伝わっていないということでしょうか？
pseek (2024-07-06 07:47:26+00:00): 申し訳ありません。認識が足りていませんでした。
「住居表記について」を再度熟読して臨みます。

お手数をおかけしました。
tyfi (2024-07-06 02:41:54+00:00): This also touches the outline of the Mississippi to exclude a protrusion for a tributary, which is not part of the river, and I adjusted the coastline to compensate. I properly connected the tributary linework to this excluded piece of waterbody.
tyfi (2024-07-06 02:42:16+00:00): 447 was also partially mapped as a track road, so I bumped that up to unclassified.
tyfi (2024-07-06 02:42:32+00:00): It was also routed completely wrong
tyfi (2024-07-06 02:45:50+00:00): 445 was completely missing. Also added a slipway
SomeoneElse (2024-07-08 21:35:24+00:00): Hello idkwhatname2use,
What licence were the "usgs maps" you used here released under.  The date will be important here - see https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/are-usgs-topographic-maps-copyrighted .
Whether these features can legally be in OSM is of course a separate issue to whether they should be in OSM or somewhere else - but we need to understand the answer to the legal question.
jm428 (2026-01-13 21:04:13+00:00): I am curious why you classified the paths in the Salem Common as tracks. I haven't been there but in the imagery they look like regular paths
StreetSurveyor (2026-01-14 01:02:43+00:00): I classified those as tracks based on my on-the-ground survey of Salem Common. From what I recall, they’re noticeably wider, which made highway=track the most appropriate classification.
jm428 (2026-01-15 03:24:53+00:00): Got it, thanks!
5m4u9 (2024-07-06 17:49:33+00:00): Hola, bienvenidos! Gracias por incluir la oficina al mapa.

Tenía algunos errores de la categoría de oficina y la arreglé, añadí algunos datos de la empresa según la página web... vendría bien si pueden revisar.
Hb- (2025-06-09 09:48:36+00:00): Bist Du hier mit der Oder schon fertig? Warum gibt es zwei Ablaufende Ströme vom Punkt 12037046145? Warum ist der Überlaufkanal in der Relation mit main_stream, hat aber keinen Zulauf?
Galbinus (2025-06-09 11:22:00+00:00): Mehr konnte ich nach den mir vorliegenden Informationen hier nicht beitragen. Wenn Du eine gute Idee hast, wie man den Überlaufkanal an den Stausee anbindet - herzlich gern. Zu den zwei ablaufenden Strömen - auch dies kannst Du gerne korrigieren.
Hb- (2025-06-09 17:40:32+00:00): Ok, danke. Ergebnis: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167410815
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-22 07:27:08+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12037068393/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
laurent-38 (2025-04-23 07:25:28+00:00): It's an harbourmaster office.
I just fixed it : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165317156
Feel free to review
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-23 07:35:22+00:00): Thanks! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12037068394 is another one stuck  with amenity=fixme
laurent-38 (2025-04-23 11:20:00+00:00): Oh, yes, I fixed it too : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165317771 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165322854
ivanbranco (2024-07-06 07:30:48+00:00): Ciao mauropili, hai duplicato (per la seconda volta) le informazioni sull'indirizzo, che sono già presenti come tag contact:street, contact:housenumber ecc. (vedi Bremen Schema e Charlieu Schema sulla wiki di OSM), che é lo schema adottato dai mapper locali in questa città. L'indirizzo con i tag addr: é già correttamente mappato sull'ingresso: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9091891032

Per curiosità potrei sapere come mai di tutti i negozi di questa città questo é di interesse per utenti da remoto? Appare su qualche tool particolare?
mauropili (2024-07-06 10:15:30+00:00): grazie per l'informazione. La particolarità che rende di interesse  questo negozio è la currency:XBT
tyfi (2024-07-06 06:17:13+00:00): The county road is not an "unmaintained" track road. It parallels the railroad, crossing two times, and terminates at the beginning of a private driveway.

Also, Chipmunk Lane does not connect to the county road through tracks afaict.
Paraguas (2024-07-06 08:50:10+00:00): Danke für die Umsetzung meiner Hinweise
ivanbranco (2024-07-06 09:52:10+00:00): Ciao mauropili,

in addr:city=* si dovrebbe mettere il nome della città (Lucca), non quello del quartiere (Sant'Anna). Anche fosse stato il nome della città, si sarebbe dovuto inserire senza abbreviazioni (Sant'Anna invece di S.Anna).

Posso chiederti qual é la fonte di queste modifiche? A giudicare dai tuoi edit hanno a che fare con il mapping relativo al bitcoin, ma sei sicuro che la licenzia sia compatibile?
mauropili (2024-07-08 16:13:24+00:00): grazie per la precisazione sulla addr:city, ho provveduto a correggere. Per quanto riguarda la licenza, quale potrebbe essere la mancata compatibilità con il completamento delle informazioni dei nodi?
zstadler (2026-01-28 15:36:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299455967
has no traces on the ground:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground

Please avoid mapping of historic places:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_historic_events_and_historic_features

By now, two other historic places have been deleted.
DaanLT (2024-07-06 08:10:52+00:00): Labas, Lietuvoje vandens telkiniai žymimi taip: https://lt.wikibooks.org/wiki/Atviro_%C5%BEem%C4%97lapio_vadovas/Redagavimas/Plotai
Prašom to laikytis, nes kiti paskui turi tvarkyti tai kas neteisingai sužymėta
Alt7706 (2024-07-07 15:42:36+00:00): tai viskas ir pažymėta tai kaip nurodyta. Kas netinka?
lefuturiste (2024-08-01 15:43:57+00:00): Comment ça Jamy ?
Mise à jour plutot ?
DaanLT (2024-07-06 08:10:11+00:00): Labas, Lietuvoje vandens telkiniai žymimi taip: https://lt.wikibooks.org/wiki/Atviro_%C5%BEem%C4%97lapio_vadovas/Redagavimas/Plotai
Prašom to laikytis, nes kiti paskui turi tvarkyti tai kas neteisingai sužymėta
Alt7706 (2024-07-07 15:40:15+00:00): Tai kas konkrečiai tau neteisingai sužymėtą ir ką tu turi tvarkyti? Man atrodo niekas čia netvarko tik visi labai viršininkauja
DaanLT (2024-07-08 04:49:55+00:00): Aš netvarkau, kitas vartotojas tvarko visus tavo kūdrų sužymėjimus.
Konkrečiai ir parašyta nuorodoje:
Lietuvoje prūdeliai, kūdros, priešgaisriniai baseinai. Tai nedideli žmonių iškasti vandens telkiniai. Žymimi "landuse=basin". 
Tu juos žymi "intermittent=yes, natural=water, water=basin".
Tai yra defaultinis iD redaktoriaus pasiūlymas, kuris Lietuvoje netaikomas/negalioja.
DaanLT (2024-07-06 08:10:30+00:00): Labas, Lietuvoje vandens telkiniai žymimi taip: https://lt.wikibooks.org/wiki/Atviro_%C5%BEem%C4%97lapio_vadovas/Redagavimas/Plotai
Prašom to laikytis, nes kiti paskui turi tvarkyti tai kas neteisingai sužymėta
Alt7706 (2024-07-07 15:41:23+00:00): konkrečiai kas netinka?