piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
borovac (2025-12-26 10:18:39+00:00): This "way/1368055106" is member of both relations: Bekasi and Kab Bekasi boundary, and he is not not in relation of Kab Bogor.
Maybe jast need time to osm.org to update rendering. All three relations are closed.
Kad Bekasi - relation/14765575
Bogor - relation/14762112
Bekasi - relation/14509733
I have a question. Is this place admin centar for "node/318882209" Bekasi? If it is, it should not be mapped as "label" but as an administrative center. The label tag is used if it only needs to render the name, but if the node representing the place is also an administrative center, that node should be tagged as admin_center within the relation.
For Kab Bogor also missing admin centar inside relation, I assume that he also has his administrative center according to the way the relationship is tagged.
Javnik (2025-12-14 13:07:47+00:00): Hej, dzięki za aktualizacje mapy!
Kilka uwag na przyszłość, w nadziei że się przydadzą:
- jeśli jakiś punkt POI przestał istnieć, zamiast dodając "former" przed nazwą, warto wszystkie znaczniki poprzedzić prefixem "disused:" (jak https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9627371075/history/4 , więcej tu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:*),
- uwaga przy przeciąganiu punktów, przez przypadek zmieniłeś geometrię budynku i połączyłeś go z chodnikiem,
- jeśli wiadomo że jakiś lokal jest zajęty przez inną działalność, można śmiało wyedytować ten punkt z nowymi danymi (ew. skasować punkt całkowicie i dodać nowy).
Wszystko już poprawiłem, nie musisz się tym przejmować! Dobrego dnia ;)
Marcin_the_Eatery (2025-12-14 20:31:04+00:00): Dziękuję za informację i pomoc, przepraszam za pomyłki. Pozdrawiam serdecznie, Marcin
MK 1 (2025-12-14 19:55:15+00:00): Нема таков автопатски излез.
Излез не е паркиралиште или станица за гориво
txemt (2026-01-27 21:34:44+00:00): You changed the Water Taxi stop from Broward County Transit to BCT. I don't think the Water Taxi is part of BCT, I believe it's a private entity that operates on the water. So, where is the BCT coming from?
Alexb60 (2025-12-13 23:36:50+00:00): Résolution de : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5087786
NeisBot (2025-12-14 08:07:46+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/365555418 v1 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/495748748 v2 | 6 crossings

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/3695567533 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175902611
user_5359 (2025-12-14 12:21:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must reverted your chang set to repair your errors. Please try again.
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-14 13:59:34+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175916635

Thanks, user_5359
pwbriggs (2025-12-14 00:35:33+00:00): Hey, thanks for working on this. But I don't understand why you're removing the tags instead of changing them?

Discussion is ongoing on the OSM US Slack at https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CCJ2P6KCH/p1765659709853359. That Slack is a helpful resource if you haven't heard about it before.

Happy mapping!
Udarian (2025-12-14 00:43:15+00:00): I was wondering why you did removed the tag. Also I am sorry I didn't bring the slack conversations previously, it slipped my mind.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
Supercoolmapeditor (2025-12-14 00:56:14+00:00): The documentation labels the tag as deprecated, and I don't see it used in other bus-related nodes.

As for duplicate routes in the Miami-Dade section, I can't seem to find any except for routes that do have the same name but their tags are different.

Thanks for the Slack link, I'll be sure to check it out!
Udarian (2025-12-14 01:01:00+00:00): nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13374698359 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1039654109 seem to be duplicates, there are others.
Supercoolmapeditor (2025-12-14 01:04:32+00:00): Both nodes have different values for their ref tags. 

They don't seem to be duplicates, but I do agree that the naming is a bit confusing.
Supercoolmapeditor (2025-12-14 01:05:53+00:00): Nevermind I see it now.
Supercoolmapeditor (2025-12-14 01:07:14+00:00): There are some stops that I have seen with the same names but aren't the same stops.
Udarian (2025-12-14 01:13:11+00:00): node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1039654109 has both MDT and BCT in the network tag and separate ref's for MDT and BCT that are separate, its missing the route:ref for both, but it seems to be the correct one for BCT.
Supercoolmapeditor (2025-12-14 01:25:44+00:00): I did a deeper search here.There is suppose to be two different stops there and other sources support this. I've updated some of the data for the spots there.

If you spot any other duplicates I can check them out as I'm doing a search currently.
Udarian (2025-12-14 01:56:57+00:00): well you could likely look at bus stops you added that are near stops that are in the following overpass turbo query https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2hfm
mueschel (2025-12-14 12:33:06+00:00): Hi,
what do these tags mean? They are not used in any other place:

capacity:diario
capacity:lunes
oscaritoz (2025-12-15 17:21:51+00:00): Hola. Son etiquetas provisionales que he insertado en el marco de una investigación que estoy haciendo. Es para indicar acumulaciones de residuos sólidos (en kilos y por día)
mueschel (2025-12-15 17:32:41+00:00): Hi,
thanks for the explanation!
Please don't add such data to the global OSM database if they are just for you research - other users of the data can't make any use of it.

There are much better places for that, e.g. displayed via umap.
oscaritoz (2025-12-16 00:26:27+00:00): Lo siento, pronto borraré esas etiquetas, como dije estoy en una etapa de investigación donde estoy aprendiendo y explorando muchas cosas, sin eliminar nada. Pronto borraré esos nodos e investigaré más sobre UMAP.
oscaritoz (2025-12-16 16:56:24+00:00): Saludos cordiales. Para comunicar que ya borré los nodos del mapa oficial OSM, gracias mueschel por su sugerencia del UMAP.  muchas gracias.
Kinsio (2025-12-14 21:35:37+00:00): Hello Bobby3! Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. I noticed that this edit has a changeset comment that does not adequately describe the changes you made. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to OpenStreetMap, and every edit should be explained by a clear changeset comment. Please use the changeset comment to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Changeset comments save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate changeset comment may be quite brief. You can read more about why good changeset comments are important and how to write good changeset comments on the OpenStreetMap Wiki at <https://osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments>. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175903506
Kinsio (2025-12-14 21:42:17+00:00): I also noticed that you tagged the drainage ditch as waterway=stream, which is not the appropriate tag for this kind of feature. Since it was a pretty straightforward fix, I went ahead and corrected it in changeset 175934192, but for future reference, the correct tag is waterway=drain or waterway=ditch. You can consult the wiki for more information on the specific meanings of these tags:
- https://osm.wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream
- https://osm.wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddrain
- https://osm.wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dditch
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175903506
AndersAndersson (2025-12-14 22:42:01+00:00): Hej!

Är det diken eller bäckar? I skogen ser det ut som bäckar som slingrar sig, men jag har aldrig sett dom med egna ögon, så du vet garanterat bättre.
stevea (2025-12-15 20:21:57+00:00): Well, yeah; that's what the construction tag means.
FrookMartineli (2025-12-15 21:30:48+00:00): Oh, gotcha. I missed that because it showed up as routeable on my gps. So must be a swtting on my end.
stevea (2025-12-15 23:52:57+00:00): No complaints, you do a lot of good work around here showing where roads can and can't be accessed — I / we / the map appreciates your detail!
SpinOff (2025-12-17 22:14:46+00:00): Hej. To nie jest nazwa opisowa? Pytam, bo poszukałem w PRNG i nie znalazłem w okolicy takiej nazwy.
Dawid2849 (2025-12-18 08:40:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5083883
uprkos (2025-12-20 07:58:24+00:00): Nazwa istnieje, ale jako nazwa użytku ekologicznego, a nie samej łąki. Użytek jest widoczny na mapie GDOŚ, ale nie udało mi się go dodać jako podkładu w JOSM, a granice użytku nie pokrywają się w pełni z granicami działek.
uprkos (2025-12-20 22:38:24+00:00): Znalazłem. Rozdzieliłem oznaczenie użytku eko i łąki jako rodzaju zagospodarowania, bo nie pokrywają 1:1. Muszę się tam jeszcze tylko wybrać by sprawdzić czy i jaka część łąki jest podmokła - na pewno nie cała.
Udarian (2025-12-14 02:18:16+00:00): small nit, you should have kept the original position of the bus stop as it was by a bus bay which is where the bus would stop, I've moved it back. Sometimes the positions in the gtfs can be positioned in correctly, we should always try and put them around where you would wait for the bus (if a sign is available on the sign).

Happy mapping,
Udar.
BCNorwich (2025-12-14 06:43:13+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Looks like that building is several residences, so the tag is building=residential. When it is divided into the individual residences, then each one should be tagged building=house.

I've tweaked the tags.

Regards Bernard.
FajrAl (2025-12-15 05:59:37+00:00): If the road leads to settlement and/or connecting settlement, but unpaved; consider adding surface tag instead changing it into track.
bernardo60 (2025-12-18 07:15:56+00:00): Thanks FajrAI - this is a useful suggestion, and I am aware that many contributors assume that an unpaved road must be a track. On the other hand, I noticed that many contributors in Bali tag a way as "residential", only because it passes a few houses. However, if the way passes through an agricultural area (such as rice fields) where most users are farmers looking after the fields, the tag "track" might be appropriate, showing the main use being agricultural. You will not find many ways in highly populated Bali where there are no houses, but that does not mean it is residential. What do you think?
Taya_S (2026-01-27 08:03:00+00:00): Why did you add things to the administrative boundary here?
NagaBazar (2026-05-06 10:09:07+00:00): ello,
Thank you for your comment.
I am sorry, I am still learning OpenStreetMap and I do not fully understand how to fix this yet.
I will not edit administrative boundaries again.
Could you please help me correct this or guide me?
Thank you.
VLD0251 (2025-12-16 15:38:58+00:00): Hi Gurusraouta, 
Could you please use more descriptive comments? updating with every change is not helpful.
please do not remove the French from "name"; Mauritania is multilingual
user_18913526 (2025-12-16 15:57:29+00:00): French names were added without community consent or discussion by a single user, this is forbidden, I am just restoring the previous community-consent status quo. French is neither an official language in Mauritania nor a native language of the population in Mauritania. But you are right in the case that I should make my comments more descriptive. :)
VLD0251 (2025-12-16 17:12:47+00:00): Mauritania is an African and Maghreb country whose population mainly speaks Hassaniya Arabic and Tamazight, with French being used particularly in administration and education.
VLD0251 (2025-12-16 15:59:55+00:00): Hi Gurusraouta;
Please use clear comments. why is Tamazight removed from the "name" when the Moroccan community supports all three languages?
user_18913526 (2025-12-16 16:28:53+00:00): A "name" tag didn't exist before, no "name" tag was removed, as you can see  in the history:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/732390430/history I cannot add a name in a language I don't know precisly. You are free to add the name tag, if you are firm in Standard Morrocan Tamazight. :) .
VLD0251 (2025-12-16 16:50:57+00:00): Your changes must be reviewed one by one
VLD0251 (2025-12-16 17:40:40+00:00): Why are all the points of interest named after the village of Ait Zeggane?
Where do these names come from, and do you have any sources on this?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13375210709
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13375210711
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13375210707
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13375210710
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13375210706
FajrAl (2025-12-18 03:32:24+00:00): Apakah kantor node/13375216913 ini dapat diverifikasi? Letaknya di Kelenteng Perkumpulan Hwie Tiauw Ka.

Is this office node/13375216913 verifiable? it's located in Perkumpulan Hwie Tiauw Ka Temple.
FajrAl (2026-06-04 04:06:28+00:00): still awaiting the answer
仍在等待答案
brightj (2026-01-07 04:09:24+00:00): Thank you!
SomeoneElse (2025-12-14 12:30:03+00:00): Thanks!
Supaplex (2025-12-14 07:53:00+00:00): Hi, 

Your changeset across the whole East Asia. You should restrain to 2 changesets at least
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175907107
Joseph R P (2025-12-22 23:58:10+00:00): What makes these changes unsubstantiated? How a road serves in the local road network can be explained by its connectivity with destinations/other roads (its usage as an arterial, collector, etc.) and traffic counts.
Arlo James Barnes (2026-01-27 09:27:30+00:00): perhaps-related changeset discussion: https://osm.org/changeset/144022958
無限の刃 (2025-12-24 09:23:39+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:leisure%3Dpitch
mueschel (2025-12-16 14:23:57+00:00): Hi,
could you check your edits? There are at least 9 'macot' and 'macot:...' tags around the world.
watmildon (2025-12-16 17:41:13+00:00): The wiki has some documentation you may find informative. Can you be a bit more specific about your concerns? 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mascot
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mascot:iconography
mueschel (2025-12-16 18:56:19+00:00): My concern is the missing "s" :-)
watmildon (2025-12-16 21:03:16+00:00): A ha! Love an easy fix. I will periodically look at the "similar" things in tag info to catch stuff like this (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/mascot#similar). Thanks for the note. I will tidy things up.
Štěpán Škorpil (2025-12-15 12:57:13+00:00): To je nějak zvláštně plošná změna přes různé městské čtvrti. Mě to například pomazalo už částečně upravené zahrady v Jahodový. Proč se to provedlo?
Dvorný (2025-12-16 11:28:33+00:00): Ručně jsem prošel zahrady a ty které měly špatnou geometri jsem smazal.
Dvorný (2025-12-16 11:29:36+00:00): Viz diskuze na mailing listu: https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz/c4365
Fjana (2026-03-25 22:49:27+00:00): Hello, could you please stop deleting the local names? I live near and can verify them through survey. There is a reason why they are there. I have moved them to loc_name to make it clear that those are local names that are demarcated in the terrain.

Thank you.
Tomas_J (2026-03-26 09:51:53+00:00): Zdar, doporučuji nahlásit na DWG, neoprávněné mazání práce jiných se u mapperue opakuje, řešilo se to už i na českém osm fóru. :(
Fjana (2026-03-26 10:55:23+00:00): Už se mi to s ním stalo několikrát, ale zrovna na tuhle cestu si nějak zasedl, už ji dávám do správného stavu potřetí. Můžu tam dávat source tag jako blbec a k ničemu to očividně není.
mapperue (2026-03-26 12:11:24+00:00): A co tak dodržovat pravidla značení a používat u ulic oficiální názvy?
Stejně tak to platí pro další vlastní tvorbu ve značce name=* "předzahrádka U Salzmannů", "výstavba rodinných domů", "hradební zeď", "kolej pro opravované podvozky", "bývalá usazovací nádrž", "vnější sklad kaolinu", "bývalá budova MNV Kaznějov" a další vlastní tvorba.
Fjana (2026-03-26 12:20:54+00:00): name=* má označovat skutečně používané jméno. Pokud ti jde o oficiální název, tak používej explicitně tag official_name=*

Pokud je zajetý název, který všichni používají, a který je v terénu označený, nedává smysl ho schovávat.

Name nemusí nutně reflektovat úředně potvrzené názvy, pokud jde o primární název, jde i podle stránky name=*. Klidně se můžeš kouknout na fotografie z oblasti (např. panorama nebo StreetView, pokud mi nevěříš), že v terénu nebo na případných webových stránkách samospráv jsou názvy mnou přidávané skutečně označené.

Nemám v zásadě problém názvy místních komunikací používané místními, zaznačené v terénu nebo uváděné místními samosprávami do loc_name=* , ale tohle musíme prokomunikovat a ne hned revertovat.

Původní shodu na tom dávat to do name=* si můžeš dohledat v chatech, které používá česká OSM komunita. Před tím, než začneš mazat nečí práci, která je mimo jiné opatřená tagy se zdroji a je vysvětlená v note, je lepší to řešit v komentářích a civilizovaně se na něčem domluvit.
Tomas_J (2026-03-26 15:05:00+00:00): Tu ale jde o nazev "Dudákova zákruta", ne o obecne popisy, ktere uvadis jako argument vyse. Pokud ma Fjana zdroj survey, byl nebo bydli na miste, tak je slusne se pred mazanim alespon zeptat, nebo pridat fixme. To same se tyka tvych dalsich mazacich aktivit u jinych uzivatelu (napr. pozustatky zaniklych vesnic diky kterym ses nechvalne dostal do ceskeho diskusniho fora a pod.) . Nekdo si da nemalou praci se zjistovanim veci v terenu, kterou mu ty jednim klikem z kresla smazes. Proste mi toto chovani dlouhodobe neprijde v poradku u zkuseneho mapera, ktery by mohl vedet kolik je za mapovanim prace co dela.
Taya_S (2025-12-14 14:13:36+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175920711
NeisBot (2025-12-14 07:26:12+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 315 of your last 315 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23610957
Omnific (2025-12-14 14:09:56+00:00): This user is a vandal. All edits need to be reverted.
Taya_S (2025-12-14 14:15:16+00:00): Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19166
NeisBot (2025-12-14 08:08:26+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 15 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/163799954 v10 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/936689624 v4 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/936576367 v5 | 3 crossings

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5836730609 v3
https://osm.org/node/1720124680 v4
https://osm.org/node/8678314827 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175908692
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-16 16:28:40+00:00): Should be corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175921767
Luzandro (2025-12-15 11:37:05+00:00): Hallo,

die Unteradressen "Villa..." waren schon als addr:unit erfasst, daher werden sie jetzt auch z.B. im Standardstil auf osm.org doppelt angezeigt

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr:*#Adressebenen_unterhalb_der_Hausnummer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175908725
Feuerwehr Himberg (2025-12-15 18:47:49+00:00): Danke auch das haben wir angepasst. mfg Feuerwehr Himerg
rle32795 (2025-12-14 08:47:38+00:00):  Detailing from aerial and survey.
aceman444 (2026-05-01 17:04:02+00:00): No dobre, ale relacia boundary=administrative ma obsahovat linie hranic oblasti, nie len body.
A na admin_level=10 mame dlhe roky katastralne uzemia, nie miestne casti, takze na tu uroven ste to nemali dat.
Prave to koncepcne ideme doriesit na https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/zQXWakjARnE .
Filip009CZ (2026-05-01 18:52:55+00:00): Ja viem,ze má obsahovať hranice, ale chcel som to nejak zlúčiť, kľudne to môžete prerobiť. Len nie sú známe konkrétne hranice, preto som to zlúčil podľa častí bez hraníc. Pokiaľ máte presnejšie informácie o hraniciach daných častí, kľudne ich môžete pridať.

Vybral som o úroveň nižšie ako bola daná obec. Hlbšie som sa nad tým nezamýšľal.

Diskusiu si priebežne čítam, ale pre mňa je to nezaujímavá téma, čiže ako sa dohodnete, tak to bude.
sm4rk0 (2025-12-15 21:05:30+00:00): Здраво Перо,

Хвала ти на свим корисним изменама и доприносима мапи до сада! Молим те за пар ствари:
1. "svi se ovde ponasaju kao da je trunk road tako dam sam promenio da bude trunk road" није логика којом се одлучује врста пута. Неко је то већ приметио и вратио твоју измену у претходно стање (revert).
2. Молим те, пиши смислене поруке у опису својих измена, а не sdf, fgvh, и слично.
3. Ово се рачуна као вандализам и довољан је разлог да ти се блокира налог, прво на одређено време, а после тога и заувек.

Надам се да ћеш моје савете схватити добронамерно и да ћеш наставити са конструктивним доприносом нашем заједничком циљу.

У случају да желиш да се укључиш у српску OSM заједницу, имамо форум:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/rs/64

И Телеграм групу:
https://t.me/osm_sr

Поздрав,
Марко Станковић
sm4rk0 (2025-12-15 21:07:24+00:00): Под тачком три сам мислио на "Babin brat dusan tu je govno": https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172180605
Kovoschiz (2025-12-14 09:27:36+00:00): `=parking_aisle` should not be used if it's the only road. It doesn't mean any roads for parking. There's no aisle to speak of.
eggie (2025-12-14 09:43:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback layer=-1 betekent in dit geval dat het pad onder de grond loopt.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-14 09:59:57+00:00): Joost...   Ik heb layer=-1 verwijderd.
Mooi project daar.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-14 09:47:00+00:00): Zou de tuin Soesterhof heten en het gebouw wellicht Tuinhuis Soesterhof. Dan hoort die naam op het tuinhuis. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-14 09:50:07+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast.. Dus er is verschil in het buurtje en het tuinhuis.
MVG
eggie
wandelzot (2025-12-14 10:10:35+00:00): vanwege de vele close nodes warning die ik in de id editor kreeg heb ik een building select gedaan en een simplify way met 0.2m tolerantie. dit lost het probleem op, en de close nodes waren waarschijnlijk ruis van een import. reacties welkom
azakh-world (2025-12-15 08:41:02+00:00): Hi.
You've added platforms to the end of the list of route relation members. But the members should follow in order, platform after the corresponding stop_position.

https://cdn.organicmaps.app/subway/usa.html#chicago

Please monitor this page after your changes. The public transport data is used by applications. "Red" cities makes other people to fix errors again and again.
rskedgell (2025-12-14 12:27:49+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175916881
eggie (2025-12-14 10:05:52+00:00): Beste meditor,

Zou je svp geen gebouwen willen aanpassen in OSM op grond van luchtfoto's .
Dat is al eerder gevraagd.

Geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt aangepast.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-14 10:14:31+00:00): Gebruik voor openingstijden de juiset format.
De taal in OSM tagging is UK English. 
Je zou deze tool kunnen gebruiken.
openingsuren-tool

http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

MVG
eggie