piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:36:59+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801882
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:54:38+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164660151
ManuelB701 (2024-12-24 06:21:14+00:00): I assume this was supposed to only affect Australia?

I've noticed this since you've added a bench to the Faroe Islands whereas the remaining elements are all located in Australia.
Chris melbs (2024-12-24 10:12:52+00:00): Oops, sorry I forgot to commit an update in the Faroe Islands from a few months ago.
az09 (2025-01-09 09:40:00+00:00): считаю в name это лишнее)
StreetSurveyor (2025-01-10 01:37:15+00:00): Hi, you deleted a sidewalk that I personally surveyed/walked on Rte1S side and changed foot=no.
StreetSurveyor (2025-01-10 01:37:41+00:00): Northbound rather
nevw (2024-12-24 12:27:07+00:00): Hi, I had to revert this due to the way you mapped this.
Can you tell us what SLC is and where is it located as I can't locate it on the map? Which default routing are you referring to? The service road is gated where it joins Soldiers Road and sign states private property and land is or leads to Rivercrest Christian College so I am not surprised a navigation app does not route down the road when approaching from Ferdinand Drive.
But if SLC is mapped perhaps some apps may route to it along the service road you altered.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:54:39+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164660151
gendy54 (2025-01-24 20:29:14+00:00): Bonjour,

Que représentent ces noms? Nous ne mettons sur OSM que des noms publics et reconnus.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160562697
Yannick-VTT-Ride (2025-01-25 10:09:22+00:00): Bonjour, ce single est le nom du groupe FB que j ai créer ( Ride VTT électrique )
luiswoo (2024-12-24 08:10:51+00:00): И какой в этом смысл?
Grass-snake (2024-12-24 15:56:19+00:00):  Считаю, что площади лучше обозначать тегом place=square (на точке или полигоне), а не названием дорог. Да, "площадь" может обозначаться на дороге, но стараюсь переделывать при возможности на place.
luiswoo (2024-12-24 17:32:48+00:00): Лучше для чего и зачем? Чем мешает обозначение на дороге, что его нужно убирать. Что значит может обозначаться? Вот тут https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/47.231415/39.763277 — четыре площади и это официальный адрес. Переделываем на точку?
K_Sakanoshita (2025-01-04 12:46:28+00:00): 始めまして、広島駅のバスターミナル周辺のマッピングありがとうございます。
ただ、参考にされている航空写真が古いようで前の方が編集した内容から古い内容になっているようです。
また、 way/1334454156 の歩道などがおかしくなっているのもありました。
マッピングして頂いたのに申し訳ありませんが、直近（数ヶ月）の編集結果が航空写真と大きく異なっている場合は、現地調査の結果が反映されている可能性があるので、現地確認の上で編集して頂けたら幸いです。
grzegorz75jan (2025-07-15 11:16:52+00:00): Panie kochany przy tak długim moście https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301158602 to nawet Chińczycy byli by z nas dumni a znając ... życie to nie ma tam mostu tylko przepust.

Dłubłem trochę drogi bo to paranoja jak to wygląda.
Herman Lee (2024-12-25 07:29:47+00:00): Some of changesets has been reverted since there are wrong edits. The Vietnamese can be labelled in tag "name:vi" rather than "name" itself in other countries.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-10 11:17:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5085935 - it seems that you accidentally mapped shop, not address
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-10 11:18:11+00:00): also address is already on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1345394393
santamariense (2025-01-21 18:01:08+00:00): Olá Definho,

Se a igreja não existir mais, e o prédio onde ela estava permaneceu, o correto é apagar/atualizar os rótulos, mantendo a geometria.

Bons mapeamentos!
santamariense
ivanbranco (2025-01-01 15:28:49+00:00): Ciao marcoecaibo,

ho notato che metti "name=CAI 903-915-AT" e simili ai segnavia. La pagina wiki del CAI (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI#Luoghi_di_posa) dice che name=* "dovrebbe coincidere con quello del luogo (un passo, una sella) in cui si trova o se è un oggetto particolare conosciuto ad esempio “monumento ai caduti…” altrimenti non si mette". Quindi in questo caso non andrebbe messo. Puoi aggiungere il guidepost alla relazioni 903, 915 ecc. con ruolo "guidepost" per indicare che ne fa parte.

Hai aggiunto "note=Relation maintained by CAI Bologna" ma gli elementi OSM sono mantenuti da tutti i contributori di OSM. Ad esempio questa guidepost é mappata in mezzo alla strada (mentre in realtà si trova ai lati), io potrei spostarla nella posizione corretta pur non facendo parte di CAI Bologna. Se intendi dire che il cartello é fisicamente gestito dal CAI Bologna, allora il tag corretto é "operator=CAI Bologna". A cui potresti aggiungere "operator:website=https://www.caibo.it/", in quanto website=* da solo (come é ora) va utilizzato per siti web riguardanti il singolo elemento (quindi questo segnavia in particolare, che non é il caso).

Grazie per le modifiche e buon mapping
hutandave (2025-03-04 02:26:41+00:00): I looked closely at this when I labeled it a weir. Have you looked from below? The Lilly pond water level is maintained by an overflow pipe AND spill-over the weir if too full.  Perhaps I should have drawn a separate bridge over the weir?
08a636a4 (2025-03-04 03:12:52+00:00): Thanks for your feedback. I marked it not as a weir, as water doesn't "spill over the top", which in my view is a key point that defines a weir. But truth be told, I have not looked closely at how water leaves the pond. But walking along that side of the pond it feels more like a fixed barrier or dam, with it's balustrades. But below the bridge there could be "spill over" that I have not looked at / noticed.

If you say there is, I am happy to relabel it to a weir again.

Let me know your thoughts.
hutandave (2025-03-04 03:55:53+00:00): Good point about the spilling over the top. I agree that is what defines it. In this case it can spill over if too much inflow but, idk, line ball.
George Sears (2024-12-24 09:18:41+00:00): Benvenuto su OSM, la prego di evitare di effettuare modifiche ad oggetti senza sapere cosa si sta facendo,
in questo caso ha rimosso il nome della strada e anche i vari tag che definiscono l'oggetto come una strada, quindi allo stato attuale questa porzione di strada non appare nemmeno sulla mappa come tale.
Consiglio di unirti al gruppo Telegram per ricevere aiuto o consigli
https://telegram.me/OpenStreetMapItalia
George Sears (2024-12-24 09:19:08+00:00): Detto ciò procedo ad annullare le modifiche.
Emanuele2424 (2024-12-24 09:52:50+00:00): Buongiorno Purtroppo il vostro servizio sta riportando diverse denominazioni per questa strada che mi stanno creando numerosi disagi soprattutto nella consegna di pacchi. Attualmente in data odierna la strada è la strada provinciale 238. Pertanto chiedo la cortesia di eliminare ogni altra denominazione perché crea solo enormi confusioni
George Sears (2024-12-24 10:18:21+00:00): Capisco... il vero problema è che la provincia di BAT non ha ancora installato (dal 2010) i cartelli stradalli aggiornati, poiché la strada ha due numerazioni differenti nella provincia di Bari e della BAT, SP238 e SP12 rispettivamente, ma nel tratto di strada nella BAT ci sono ancora i cartelli vecchi della provincia di Bari.
In ogni caso questa strada si chiama "di Altamura" sin da quando era una statale 
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strada_statale_378_di_Altamura
Emanuele2424 (2024-12-24 10:56:03+00:00): Nel tratto in cui abito (competenza della BA), i cartelli stradali sono corretti. Infatti troviamo scritto SP 238 (EX SS 378). 
La mia zona è correttamente geolocalizzata da Google Maps, tuttavia chiunque utilizzi Bing, Apple Maps, ha difficoltà nel trovare la stessa. Idem corrieri amazon. 

Sta diventando estenuante questa questione. Pertanto, chiedo cortesemente di segnare almeno tale tratto come SP 238. 
Volendo anche solo la mia casa, con civico 21 (41,1824335, 16,4134361)

Grazie
Emanuele2424 (2024-12-24 10:57:09+00:00): Le ricordo che tale strada per metà è provincia di Bari, e per metà provincia di BAT. la zona a cui sto facendo riferimento è provincia di Bari, ed è quella di mio interesse. Ho residenza qui e ho necessità che i sistemi siano allineati. Sto perdendo molta posta.
George Sears (2024-12-24 11:06:03+00:00): Invece il tratto in questione si trova nell'area del comune di Trani e perciò nella BAT, i confini sono visibile sulla mappa
Emanuele2424 (2024-12-24 11:11:22+00:00): Con tutto il rispetto, ma credo di sapere dove abito e a chi pago le tasse comunali. 
Le coordinate fornite sono in provincia di Bari, con esattezza Strada Provinciale 238, n.21. 

In realtà il tratto in questione segnato sulle vostre mappe, ha confini errati. La provincia di Bari finisce qualche metro dopo le coordinate date. Può consultare streetview di google per vedere il cartello di confine provincia.
eggie (2024-12-24 08:38:00+00:00): Dag Niels...
De brug heb ik minder lang gemaakt en de wegklassen omgezet naar highway=path.
Er staat volgens mij geen G7 bord en op een wandelpad zou je niet mogen fietsen. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-12-24 08:50:11+00:00): Nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. Bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Mintusha98 (2025-03-11 17:47:44+00:00): Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-26 00:28:09+00:00): This changeset connected several bridges to the roads they cross.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160567036
pavvv (2024-12-24 09:30:55+00:00): note that this also prohibits buses from  entering the busway, so you'll either have to change this restriction into a no left turn or change the geometry of one of the ways a little bit
Bolt051 (2024-12-24 10:48:05+00:00): Hi pavv, thanks for the comm. I did some small adjustment, moving the bus lane intersection a bit different that on the node I added the TR. Please have a check. Thanks.
AnaVrbica (2024-12-25 15:09:56+00:00): Reverted because of a node added #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160607285
Fischkopp0815 (2024-12-24 13:22:59+00:00): Bite prüfe mal cuisine. Ist das noch richtig?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:cuisine
Adventurize (2026-01-05 06:22:40+00:00): I revert this because these stations don't exist anymore

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176846774
Leo Slager (2024-12-24 23:13:46+00:00): De route lijkt niet compleet te zijn.
De bushaltes staan er in maar de wegen zijn niet volledig.
Geldt ook voor de route in de tegenrichting.
multimob (2024-12-27 19:33:11+00:00): The relations are now complete with all the ways.
I suppose you only wanted to warn us. We know the problem. The situation now: we have about 800 relations to regenerate or review, for the January changes. Getting relation tags and the stops in the right order is easy, but adding ways to build the itinerary takes a lot of time. This is why we sometimes upload a half-done relation, which we can complete later, after the rush.
Leo Slager (2024-12-27 23:39:24+00:00): Indeed, just a heads up.
I check the route relation with OSM inspector on a daily basis:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=6.46762&lat=52.36963&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes.

Perhaps also useful for you.
MaliMrav (2024-12-26 08:54:30+00:00): Reverted, becase:

1. You modified administrative boundary (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424070118). Don't do that, they are regulated by the goverment institutions
2. You added junction names (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1345440960) even though you were told not to do that, and some previous changesets were already reverted for this.
3. You removed some useful information from tags, like Wikidata from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/827013474
mavl (2025-05-13 15:09:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mcliquid (2024-12-26 15:44:22+00:00): Revert of changesets 160569870, 160569482 and 160570604 for the unauthorized use of Google Street View.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160642919
czebureks (2025-01-19 01:25:33+00:00): Cześć!
Sprawdziłem ponownie, i tylko ten obszar na razie jest terenem budowy:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1333484173
silversurfer83 (2024-12-25 20:04:42+00:00): Gude :)

zwei Kleinigkeiten die Du in Zukunft vielleicht besser machen könntest:

- dran denken die Daten hochzuladen, bevor du an anderer Stelle mappst
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

- etwas aussagekräftigere Kommentare an deine Änderungen schreiben
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Vielen Dank und weiter allzeit gute Reise und viel Spaß an der Karte
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160569863
donovaly (2024-12-29 01:08:08+00:00): Sorry, but you cannot change the rout of a river. The river flows completely different than how you mapped it.
BCNorwich (2024-12-25 11:53:02+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I see you've tagged/addressed the whole building as one house. I wonder though if this is actually a residential building of more than one house? I can help with corrections if you wish.

Regards Benard.
mavl (2024-12-24 15:09:09+00:00): Здравствуйте. Номер строения обозначают буквой "с". Например, 17 c3.  
   
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1344031213  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
GlobalScan (2024-12-25 04:44:23+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за замечание. Поправил.
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
emersonveenstra (2024-12-28 13:08:39+00:00): Hi there,

In OSM, street names need to be spelled out in full and capitalized. Can you please fix these two road names? Thanks!
Dimitar155 (2024-12-24 10:54:08+00:00): The 660 unresolved warnings are related to the fact that buildings don't share nodes and overlap by a few centimeters. It would be nice if someone can fix them.
harvey76 (2025-01-14 08:25:29+00:00): fixed
Dimitar155 (2025-01-14 19:08:56+00:00): Thanks!
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Dondalorian (2024-12-30 05:51:00+00:00): I've since realised this is not valid. Feel free to revert this
donovaly (2024-12-29 01:31:39+00:00): What do you do? Have you ever been there? You cannot just add what you like, only the reality. The reality is it is under construction. Even the roof is not yet ready.
donovaly (2024-12-29 01:37:07+00:00): Springvale Endoscopy Centre Day Hospita in Tirana at a Balmoral Avenue?
donovaly (2024-12-29 01:40:39+00:00): And you added buildings and tagged it with check date 2024-08-26.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-10 16:13:58+00:00): Hello!

You used
maxstay=1.5 hours-----
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158559233/history

Have you maybe meant
maxstay=1.5 hours
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
did-j (2025-04-10 17:18:59+00:00): you are right I wanted to write 1.5 hour. I let you modify. Best regards
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-11 07:52:33+00:00): fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164802402
did-j (2025-04-11 18:40:30+00:00): Thank's.
eggie (2024-12-24 12:29:34+00:00): R0bbert.
Je kunt in JOSM bij upload in het uploadvenster  het vakje aan klikken 'Automatische Bron van huidige lagen ophalen'. Dan kunnen medemappers zien welke bronnen je gebruikt als achtergrond.
Je hoeft dat maar eenmalig te doen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-12-24 12:25:32+00:00): Dag Frank,

Mag dit wel routeren voor regulier verkeer.
Wellicht ook accesstags op de toegangsweg?
access=private
MVG
eggie
Frank5698751 (2024-12-24 12:30:38+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Dank voor het meedenken. 
Ja dat mag inderdaad. 

Groeten Frank
mavl (2025-02-05 14:03:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162167075 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: wrong values for name:en - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161608012].
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 02:12:32+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165051294
N9713 (2024-12-25 16:35:44+00:00): Hallo DrFra85, warum löschst du entlang der Bremer/Osnabrücker Straße die Fuß-/Radwege? Diese waren soweit korrekt gemappt, wie es dem Wiki entspricht.
DeFra85 (2024-12-25 16:57:19+00:00): Ich habe sie nur auf die Straße gelegt, da sie als Bürgersteig zur Straße gehören und man jederzeit die Seite wechseln kann
N9713 (2024-12-25 18:30:24+00:00): Das ist aber an vielen Stellen dort nicht zutreffend: An der Wehrendorfer Straße auf Höhe "Zur Post" sowie An der Bremer Straße zwischen Bahnhof und "An der Müggenburg" verläuft der sidewalk hinter einer Parkreihe, die verhindert, dass man die Straße überall queren kann. An der Osnabrücker Straße auf Höhe der Einkaufsmärkte sind die Fuß/Radwege durch einen kleinen Grünstreifen und Leitpfosten von der Straße getrennt. Sind Wege durch solche Barrieren von der Straße getrennt, sind Wege als eigene ways zu führen.

Außerdem ist, wenn es keine parallelen Wege gibt, zumindest an der Straße dann ein adäquates tagging für Fuß- und Radverkehr herzustellen. An der Osnabrücker Straße hast Du einfach cycleway=separate stehen lassen, wodurch es jetzt praktisch kein funktionierendes routing für den Radverkehr mehr gibt.
nevw (2024-12-24 12:45:56+00:00): Hi, the part you have disconnected is not disconnected in the satellite view. The way you have tagged this section as being bridge is incorrect - you need to split the road at each end of the bridge and add the bridge tag only to that portion. Is this road on private property or public land. If it is on private property you can add access=private.
Is the road only 4wd accessible when in flood or at all times?
Three Rights Make a Left (2024-12-24 15:46:36+00:00): Hey, thank you for your feedback I have fixed the errors and added an intermittent stream. The road is public but the end portion where I have made the changes has not been maintained and a through road for years and people get directed down there as it appears quicker on maps.
nevw (2024-12-25 00:14:13+00:00): Thanks, l would be surprised if vehicles take that shortcut with those tags.
bxl-forever (2024-12-24 13:21:02+00:00): Hello,

Please do not draw houses on aerial imagery, those images do not show the correct shape of buildings.

When you open the editor, click the "Background" button and scroll down to "Digitaal Vlaanderen GRB".  You can safely use this to trace buildings.
nokeraii (2024-12-24 14:59:40+00:00): Hello. Thank you for the tip!
Cele078 (2024-12-24 15:07:23+00:00): Ciao Thomaso,
per info le linee Luzzone e Pian Geirett non fanno parte della network Arcobaleno, bensì Bus alpin (cfr. https://busalpin.ch/). Infatti gli abbonamenti Arcobaleno e GA non sono riconosciuti e la tariffazione è completamente diversa.
Thomaso58 (2024-12-24 22:24:31+00:00): Ciao Cele078. Grazie per la informatione. 
Non lo sapevo. Ora è cambiato, incluso il sito web. Grazie mille Tommaso
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-24 12:20:58+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9882575898

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kwasow (2024-12-24 12:29:01+00:00): Usunąłem nadmiarowe metadane, dzięki za uwagę
jemcek (2024-12-25 21:03:45+00:00): Hi, 
what sac_scale level was set before? Did you also change the visibility? 
(I can't find it out in the logs)
I would like to know why to my knowledge only mapy.cz on iPhone displayed this path in offline mode. All the others I tried (Locus etc...) didn't show it up. 
regards, Miha
xy5 (2024-12-27 19:46:01+00:00): I don't know which level was before.
I lowered the visibility by one level I think.
I can see this path in Kommot on the web and in the mobile app, also in the Locus map.
Jaka Kranjc (2024-12-30 09:11:36+00:00): Both were one lower, as can be seen from history. Maybe we should mark it one-way too, but I doubt this is displayed for paths.
NeisBot (2024-12-24 12:22:38+00:00): Hi Martina70, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 84% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 86 building(s)
- 6 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=160573566
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-24 12:53:53+00:00): Looks like some contributors added buildings, while others decided to play 'build and remove' later ...
adiatmad (2025-01-06 04:54:23+00:00): Reverted on this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160778805)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160573566
eggie (2024-12-24 13:52:10+00:00): Dag osmdg

Beter geen adresnodes veranderen. Wanneer een beddrijf verhuist dan blijft toch het oude adres achter? 

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2024-12-24 12:28:37+00:00): Hi Estherluanda, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 98% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 598 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=160573727
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-24 12:54:02+00:00): Looks like some contributors added buildings, while others decided to play 'build and remove' later ...
Dodko (2024-12-26 09:02:16+00:00): Mesto nepridelilo budove adresu s ulicou a orientačným číslom, je tam iba súpisné číslo bez ulice.
paunofu (2024-12-24 14:02:36+00:00): Hola, 230 habitantes no es suficiente para considerar la urbanitzación como un suburb, de adecua mas la etiqueta que había anteriormente.

Un saludo, Pau.