piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rskedgell (2025-12-05 08:18:57+00:00): (Review requested)

Pedestrians are implicitly allowed on highway=cycleway ways in the UK, please see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway#Foot_access_on_cycleways
and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#United_Kingdom

If you wish to emphasise that it's a shared path, you could always add foot=yes (some might argue that it's technically redundant, but it's very common) and segregated=no.

Use of highway=path creates problems, as it requires explicit access tagging to work out which transport modes are actually allowed.
Frans S (2026-01-03 12:15:38+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
This task is a challenge.
Rather accurately mapped.
However:
* Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object.

* Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such as roads and paths.
Keep that in mind on future mappings.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-12-20 16:39:54+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
 * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object.
Best regards
yelisey90 (2025-12-05 07:46:15+00:00): reverted - this is TTC

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175535427
rhhs (2025-12-05 08:51:08+00:00): Thanks for the work you put in this! However I think the area you created contains both taxiways and aprons: these should be separate areas. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aeroways
Are you sure the surface is asphalt? It is often hard to see the difference between asphalt and concrete
user_5359 (2025-12-06 08:29:44+00:00): Welcoem to OSM! Please use lowercase characters for the keys and values: highway=path instead of Highway=Path!
Taya_S (2025-12-05 05:42:33+00:00): reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175532248
NeisBot (2025-12-05 04:46:11+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 302 of your last 305 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23576109
MNbrn (2025-12-08 17:06:19+00:00): Почему дублируете дома?
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-08 17:18:29+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175678006
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-08 17:17:47+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175677976
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-08 17:16:37+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175677926
Dawid2849 (2025-12-05 09:48:24+00:00): Thanks
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-08 17:15:24+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175677867
VigilantPenguin (2026-02-03 20:08:21+00:00): There are no tolls on the I-5 Express Lanes. The link in the changeset description doesn't even mention tolling, how was this conclusion made? Please revert tolling-specific changes.
amakarevich_lyft (2026-02-03 21:54:45+00:00): Hi VigilantPenguin,

I'm Artem, the OSM Policy Lead at Lyft. Thanks for raising this issue. You are absolutely right. I have removed the toll conditions from all affected ways in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178069341). I apologize for any issues this may have caused
Best regards,
Artem
VigilantPenguin (2026-02-05 00:09:39+00:00): Thank you very much!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 07:21:36+00:00): Thanks for fixes!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 07:22:35+00:00): though note that building= themselves are currently not mapped and need to be added
NeisBot (2025-12-13 22:20:20+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Accounting firm in Las Cruces"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 17:16:09+00:00): 🔴 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by https://osm.org/changeset/176015948
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 17:19:46+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13354912517/history has app_operated = yes that was added in this edit
What app_operated=yes means here? Have you wanted to mark that you can control it with app in some way but app may be necessary or not? For example shop where you can scan and pay with app, without going through a traditional line. Or is it for objects where you need an app to use them at all? Then maybe app_operated=only would be better?

Note, this key seems undocumented on wiki, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:app_operated and
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 17:22:59+00:00): welp, this page actually exists now, I forgot to check it and I forgot that I tried to document it (feel free to check its correctness!)

sorry for last sentence being wrong
HPZ_90 (2025-12-05 18:17:41+00:00): Hello Mateusz! I wanted to indicate this parcel locker can be operated (send/picnup oarcels etc.) either via display not using a smartphone at all or qr codes from the app can be scanned for various actions. Regarding the wiki page you mentioned, I figured this should be correct to tag it like that.
Lusze (2025-12-05 12:57:21+00:00): Hello, I wanted to ask why you changed the tower of St. John's Church from a bell tower back to a observation tower. The tower was built as a bell tower for the church and still serves primarily as such today. I have found no evidence that the tower was primarily used as an observation tower in history. The fact that people go up there for the view is rather secondary and has only been reinforced by its use for tourism.
Tomas Straupis (2025-12-05 13:01:54+00:00): Because it is CURRENTLY an observation tower. When people search for observation towers in our tourism search, this one should also be listed.
Sakari_N (2026-02-07 12:11:45+00:00): Moi,

Millä perusteella tämä on highway=service? Ainakin kaupungin virastokartasta voisi tulkita että tämä on puistoaluetta jossa menee kävely/pyörätie.
Taksine (2025-12-14 05:01:32+00:00): Both Burmese and Chinese are official languages ​​in this region, so you should not remove Chinese from the main name tag.
Thant Zin Maw (2025-12-16 06:37:49+00:00): yes, Thanks for your comments on my data update and noted with many thanks. I just integrated and updated the data without interrupting the data history of name. Oh, sorry, I am not intending to remove the old version data, including chinese language. So, I guess the original data still exits in there including Chinese language. Thanks
Frans S (2025-12-09 14:24:54+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
We welcome you as a new mapper.
I am reviewing your mappings and am sorry to say that your mappings do not meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Too inaccurate mapping, buildings not squared, and used the wrong tagging.
Tag buildings just as building=yes.
Gregory Peony (2025-12-21 03:01:15+00:00): Hi, you deleted a no longer existing building which is good, but you did not reuse the existing building data correctly, because the footpritns now represent different ones than they did before. Look for a pattern, could a significant portion of existing data all be moved in the same direction to align it?

To see what I mean, have a look at https://osmcha.org/changesets/176202824

 Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Frans S (2025-12-21 10:06:55+00:00): Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task
.* Please accurately outline all buildings. (You often include a piece or a complete courtyard.)
Most buildings are strictly rectangular. Square them with the Q key
Quality prevails above quantity.

Keep on mapping!
Frans S (2025-12-21 10:08:34+00:00): Another issue
 * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object.
Best regards
旧加卷 (2025-12-06 05:49:47+00:00): 联络线不算crossover，存车线算siding吧
w/1456196073和w/1456196074应该画成一个站台
Skylark_H_C (2025-12-06 15:39:52+00:00): About the argument between siding and yard, I've asked some people before, and they gave me a link (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:OpenRailwayMap/Tagging_in_China) that said I should tag it as yard in the metro systems.
For the platform, as the ref may differ between inbound and outbound platforms (e.g., Guangzhou and Hong Kong), I would like to tag it separately for better naming.
As for the connectional track between Line 1 and 2, I saw that a lot of them were tagged as service=yard. I'll modify it once I confirm.

关于侧线（siding）和编组场（yard）之间的争议，我之前咨询过一些人，他们提供了一个链接（https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:OpenRailwayMap/Tagging_in_China），说在地铁系统中应该将其标记为 yard（编组场/车辆段）。
关于站台，由于上行和下行站台的编号（ref）可能不同（例如广州和香港），我希望将其分开标记，以便更好地命名。
至于1号线和2号线之间的联络线，我看到很多都被标记为 service=yard。我会在确认后进行修改。
旧加卷 (2025-12-06 20:56:42+00:00): 存车线是靠近车站并与正线平行的轨道（例如w/1454673574），不是车辆段线。我查阅了https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:OpenRailwayMap/Tagging_in_China ，虽然其确实提到了存车线属于yard，但我还是有些不解，因为这不是通往车辆段的铁路，更像是"service=siding"描述中的相对较短，与主线平行的铁路。
关于站台，我认为可以使用"railway=platform_edge"，这样能同时兼顾站台的实际状态表示和两个不同的站台编号的表示。
至于联络线，我认为可以像正线那样不加"service=*"，因为没有合适的值。
Skylark_H_C (2025-12-07 02:59:21+00:00): As `=yard` has become a conventional practice nationwide, just let it be.
I'll take your options for the other two points.

既然“yard”已成为全国性的惯例，就让它这样吧。
我会采纳你关于另外两点的意见。
Frans S (2025-12-05 11:18:22+00:00): Hello. 
When you see an object where both the inside and outside shadows are visible, don't map it as a building. Probably it is just a cattle yard.
Best regards
rskedgell (2025-12-05 08:43:51+00:00): For a road, or other object which doesn't have an address in the conventional sense, the postal_code tag which you've already used is more appropriate.

On roads, it's often truncated to just the postcode district (IG3). That's partly because it's what tends to be displayed on street name signs, but also because many roads have properties with different postcodes.

The addr:postcode tag on the road won't do any harm, but it's more useful when added to individual buildings. I realise that this is a new development, so it may be a while before there's suitable aerial imagery from which to trace them.
Frans S (2025-12-31 11:20:46+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please map buildings just as building=yes.
From a satellite image, we cannot see what the purpose is of a building.
Please square each building you map with the Q key while selected.
Don't connect buildings to each other.

A remark. This kind of task is, in our opinion, not to be mapped by new mappers. Try a somewhat easier task.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-12-26 16:18:19+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Buildings ought to be tagged as building=yes. nothing else.
Please square each building you map with the q key
 Best regards
marc__marc (2025-12-10 08:06:42+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4700867752/history/5
Qu'est-ce qui te laisse penser que Sorégies s'écrit sans accent ?
https://www.soregies.fr/
Cordialement,
Marc
47NOE (2025-12-10 08:43:49+00:00): Bonjour,
Je viens de regarder l'historique. J'ai crée cette station il y a...9 ans et Sorégies était correctement écrit avec l'accent. C'est la dernière mise à jour proposée par Osmose il y a 5 jours qui a supprimé l'accent. Je n'ai pas vérifié ce qui était dans la base depuis si longtemps. C'est dommage qu'en voulant améliorer on induise des erreurs.
Bonne journée
Cordialement
marc__marc (2025-12-10 09:15:11+00:00): Merci pour ton retour.
J'ai justement amélioré hier  le pré-processeur à propos de cet accent, osmose ne devrait plus proposer sa suppression par erreur
https://github.com/Jungle-Bus/ref-EU-EVSE/commit/adb84bcc919f64eb21124a9dd81330aea05ca2cc
Si tu en vois d'autres n'hésites pas à les signaler si tu veux https://github.com/Jungle-Bus/ref-EU-EVSE/issues
Ou simplement ne pas accepter la suppression de l'accent :)
Cordialement,
Marc
Frans S (2025-12-09 11:44:50+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please tag buildings as building=yes .
This is default for HOTOSM mappings.

More work is required to complete this task and ensure that it is well mapped:
 * Please accurately outline all buildings.
 * Buildings should have their corners squared.
Best regards
joost schouppe (2026-01-05 13:48:07+00:00): Ik denk dat je nieuwe punt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13355014701 het reeds bestaande ziekenhuis dupliceert op https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/750692679
Jvitegem (2026-01-05 16:06:08+00:00): Ik ben van menig dat de naam van een winkel of instelling op de adres node moet staan.
En niet op een gebied.
Dit gebied herbergt veel meer dan alleen een ziekenhuis, dus als je het mij vraagt zou ik dat hele gebied verwijderen.
joost schouppe (2026-01-06 18:28:16+00:00): Als algemene regel ben ik het absoluut niet mee eens, dat een POI altijd een punt zou moeten zijn als er toevallig een adresnode beschikbaar is. Maar als er in het gebied inderdaad meerdere min of meer equivalente punten aanwezig zijn, zou je het gebied als geheel gewoon een soort landuse kunnen geven. Alleszins blijft dat er nu een dubbel is die jij veroorzaakt hebt.
DeFra85 (2025-12-31 20:38:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1463209738/history
Und hier noch so etwas: ist zwar nicht im ALKIS, aber definitiv vorhanden https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.00683736903932&lng=8.41635951127114&z=17&pKey=2034920264008453&focus=photo
DeFra85 (2025-12-31 20:39:29+00:00): Und danke für das Löschen dein Eingänge zu den jeweilige Mehrfamilienhäusern in dem Komplex. Die Amazon-Fahrer/innen nutzen übrigens auch OSM und ergänzen sowas auch gerne
wies1 (2026-01-02 14:59:34+00:00): Sehe du warst am 30.12.2025 vorort und hast es so bearbeitet, wie da gesehen. Nun denn ist ja alles ok.
Peer van Daalen (2025-12-05 12:55:19+00:00): Hallo Mone-Limone

Falls Du nach den korrekten Hausnummern in Husum suchst, kannst Du die ALKIS-Flurstücke-Karte nutzen.

https://up.picr.de/50337977fj.png

https://danord.gdi-sh.de/viewer/resources/apps/ALKIS_FS/index.html?lang=de

Ist diese Knick-Lücke zwischen den beiden Gebäuden so gewollt :-) ?

Falls Du diese Knick-Lücke weghaben möchtest, sag Bescheid. Ist einfach.
Mone-Limone (2025-12-05 15:11:40+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis und auch für den Tip mit der Flurkarte - darauf hätte ich auch selbst kommen können - danke.
Linien habe ich korrigiert, manuell. Gäbe es da auch ein eleganteres Verfahren?
Peer van Daalen (2025-12-05 15:34:26+00:00): Eleganter geht es im Editor mit den vielfältigen Möglichkeiten und Werkzeugen die die Bearbeitung vereinfachen können.

https://up.picr.de/50338464ze.png

Du berührst mit der Maus den Grundriss des Gebäudes, machst einen Rechtklick, suchst Dir in Deinem Fall aus die Option "rechtwinkelig machen" und bestätigst.

Das ist ein gutes Werkzeug, um nicht! rechteckige Gebäude rechteckig zu machen.

Da gibt es auch eine Kreisfunktion für runde Gebäude.

Kannst ja auch mal die anderen Optionen anwählen, um zu erfahren, was sie bedeuten.

Falls mal alles schief gelaufen sein sollte, kann man immer noch reverten.

Ist auch nicht schwer, aber für heute soll es erst mal reichen ;-).
Taya_S (2025-12-05 08:33:22+00:00): Reverted deletions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175536763
Taya_S (2025-12-05 08:34:21+00:00): Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19109
DeFra85 (2025-12-30 16:50:03+00:00): Dieses Gebäude wurde nicht bearbeitet sondern vandaliert!!! Wo sind die Eingänge zur Bibliothek hin? wo die zum Treppenhaus für die Büros?

VANDALISMUS
wies1 (2025-12-30 22:51:05+00:00): Hallo,
wie an anderer Stelle bereits gesagt habe hier flohoff per OSM Nachricht um Hilfe gebeten. Eine Rückantwort von flohoff steht noch aus

wies1
wies1 (2025-12-31 08:43:48+00:00): Habe nun doch einen Weg gefunden zu sehen, wo hier Eingänge waren und die wieder angebracht.
eggie (2025-12-05 08:54:21+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.
Bedankt voor uw bijdrage.
De format van de openingstijden klopt niet.
De taal in OSM is UK English
Gebruik anders deze tool: 
openingsuren-tool

http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

MVG
eggie
kubahahaha (2025-12-05 19:31:35+00:00): Ten budynek to 85? W danych urzędowych ma 85a
rafalw8 (2025-12-05 19:34:58+00:00): Tak, byłem na miejscu i widziałem numer oraz rozmawiałem z właścicielem (pracuję jako kurier).
DeFra85 (2025-12-31 18:51:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139785755/history
an dem Gebäude wurde ein Fahrstuhl angebaut!!!
DeFra85 (2025-12-31 18:56:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8853174092/history/1#map=19/52.007572/8.412682
gibt es die Laderampe nicht mehr?
DeFra85 (2025-12-31 18:58:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8853174099/history/2#map=19/52.007800/8.413695
Gibt es das Treppenhaus zu den Praxen und Wohnungen nicht mehr?
DeFra85 (2025-12-31 18:59:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8853174104/history/2
Hat die Praxis einen neuen Eingang?
DeFra85 (2025-12-31 19:00:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8853174110/history/2
Gibt es das Treppenhaus zu den Praxen und Wohnungen nicht mehr?
DeFra85 (2025-12-31 19:01:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8866010707/history/2
wurde der Eingang zum Supermarkt und Bäcker zugemauert?
DeFra85 (2025-12-31 19:02:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8872305866/history/1
Kommt man bei LIDL auch nicht mehr rein und raus?
DeFra85 (2025-12-31 19:03:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10039177068/history/1
Wie komme ich denn zur Kinderärztin?
DeFra85 (2025-12-31 19:04:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1117345287/history
Ganz schön krummes Häuschen
wies1 (2026-01-03 07:48:54+00:00): Wenn ich es richtig sehe, stimmt hier jetzt alles wieder
eggie (2025-12-05 09:13:24+00:00): Je hebt nu het pand zelf verwijderd.
De adresnode is voldoende om te taggen. Niet nogmaas de info op het gebouw zetten.

Ik zal het gebouw weer herstellen.
MVG
eggie
Puur Kip Breda (2025-12-05 09:48:05+00:00): Goedemorgen Eggie,

Ah wat fijn dat je het weer goed hebt gezet. Is er nog iets wat ik moet doen?
Of staat de info goed zo?

Hoe lang gaat er overheen dat dit zichtbaar is?
Puur Kip Breda (2025-12-05 09:49:27+00:00): In het voorbeeld hiernaast zie ik bij Haagdijk 9 geen Puur Kip staan maar Loungecafe Wonderland? Gaat dit nu wel goed?
eggie (2025-12-05 09:53:09+00:00): Het is allemaal oke zo en staat in de data. Ik heb wel nog even de format voor phone goed gezet. Dat is +31 in OSM voor Nederland. We zijn internationaal georiënteerd.
De pois ook even iets meer uit elkaar gezet.. anders zie je de tekst niet.
Rendering duurt even. CTRL-F5 voor sneller effect op een PC. Cache leegmaken. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-05 09:54:50+00:00): Wanneer je de naam nog niet ziet na rendering dan een beetjes schuiven en uitproberen. Die nummers zitten elkaar wel eens in de weg.
Nakaner (2025-12-05 10:27:41+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175541188
Gregory Peony (2025-12-20 20:38:02+00:00): Hi, I think you added some non-buildings here. Please watch [this video about imagery interpretation](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ-vUwtS3A8). 

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175538178
Frans S (2025-12-05 11:09:59+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please map round buildings as a round building. You mapped them  here also as a rectangular building
Best regards
Palina Markina (2026-01-26 08:48:14+00:00): Added oneway tag according to Esri World Imagery and Bing Streetside #mapbox_missing_roads
Frans S (2025-12-05 10:59:31+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You are very productive. ! 
Please check if there is a shadow of the object you want to map as a building.
When there is no shadow visible (at other buildings, yes), then it is mostly not a building and ought not to be mapped as a building.
Best regards
DeFra85 (2025-12-31 20:44:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/406011857/history#map=19/52.007014/8.417711
hat dir der Platz nicht gefallen oder warum hast du im Süden ordentlich was weggeschnitten???
wies1 (2026-01-02 14:52:17+00:00): Was da passiert ist, kann ich nicht mehr nachvollziehen, aber ja, die Südecke gehoert dazu, das stimmt.
AndersAndersson (2025-12-05 13:11:01+00:00): "Bankomat" as name-tag is not correct, even though the ATM has a sign reading that.
But removing information surveyed by someone is more wrong.
Bankomat is the operator. Please do not remove information you don't know anything about.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 17:49:57+00:00): Sorry! Should be now fixed and other edits like that also fixed.

In general I am trying to avoid stupid mistakes like that and rather ask people - as explanation "bankomat" is  a word in Polish for ATM. I should have researched it better, especially if object was outside Poland.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 17:56:44+00:00): And big thanks for noticing the problem!

> Bankomat is the operator. Please do not remove information you don't know anything about.

well, the problem was that I was unaware that I am missing crucial info. I will be more careful in future.
Something B (2025-12-05 20:44:19+00:00): If "Bankomat" is brand, brand=Bankomat should be added, and name=Bankomat should be removed.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 20:56:25+00:00): it seems so, but if I find myself completely mistaken I prefer to map something else after reverting myself.
AndersAndersson (2025-12-05 13:11:16+00:00): "Bankomat" as name-tag is not correct, even though the ATM has a sign reading that.
But removing information surveyed by someone is more wrong.
Bankomat is the operator. Please do not remove information you don't know anything about.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 17:49:44+00:00): Sorry! Should be now fixed and other edits like that also fixed.

In general I am trying to avoid stupid mistakes like that and rather ask people - as explanation "bankomat" is  a word in Polish for ATM. I should have researched it better, especially if object was outside Poland.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 17:56:48+00:00): And big thanks for noticing the problem!

> Bankomat is the operator. Please do not remove information you don't know anything about.

well, the problem was that I was unaware that I am missing crucial info. I will be more careful in future.
AndersAndersson (2025-12-05 22:53:55+00:00): Thanks for your reply, admitting to, and quickly fixing your error!

I want to thank you as well for the work you do in increasing the data quality.
DeFra85 (2025-12-31 20:33:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456214141/history

Herzlichen Glückwunsch!!! Dieses Gebäude ist seit über einem Jahr abgerissen
wies1 (2026-01-02 15:12:24+00:00): Dazu kann ich nichts mehr sagen, da ich, da gelöscht schon nicht mehr rekonstruieren kann um welches Gebäude es geht
DeFra85 (2026-01-02 16:03:24+00:00): Bahnhofstraße 30
DeFra85 (2026-01-02 16:03:58+00:00): Zumal der erweiterte Parkplatz noch unter dem Haus vorhanden ist
Pooh01 (2025-12-29 21:16:11+00:00): Trochę się pospieszyłeś dodając punkt baru w momencie, kiedy był on w budowie.
Tym bardziej, że tagi były przygotowane we właściwościach budynku.
Yan Bakhmat (2026-01-09 12:59:21+00:00): Tak, zgadzam się.