piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jan Wilts (2025-01-27 12:34:26+00:00): Hi Martien,

Ik zie dat je met deze changeset vehicle=no hebt gezet op het stukje Koeriersterweg vlak naast het viaduct over de Paterswoldseweg. Volgens mij mag je hier gewoon langs met de auto en klopt dit niet?
martiensch (2025-01-27 18:55:07+00:00): Hallo Jan,

De laatste editor is niet altijd de persoon die het bewuste detail aangepast heeft. Ik had via streetcomplete de achtergrond van de naam van de straat toegevoegd.

De wijziging waar de afsluiting vandaan komt is morgen precies vijf jaar geleden gemaakt. Zie daarvoor versie 6 van het segment: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/629949844/history/6 
Ik denk dat die wijziging terecht was.
Het lijkt erop dat de volgende editor bij de opening van de weg dit kleine stukje vergeten is om te openen. Kijk maar naar het buursegment en versies 6 en 7. Daar zie je dat de vehicle=no wel opgeruimd wordt. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/638604823/history/7

Het stukje weg is wél open. Open jij hem in openstreetmap? 😊

Groeten,
Martien
Jan Wilts (2025-01-27 20:09:49+00:00): Pardon, ik heb helemaal verkeerd gekeken. Sorry :).

Bij deze heb ik het aangepast.
mavl (2024-07-30 13:44:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 154606945, 154607060, 154606852, 154606682, 154606922, 154606888, 154606817, 154607086, 154607139, 154607100, 154607116, 154606768, 154607328, 154606972, 154607347, 154607243, 154606611, 154607170, 154607000, 154607035, 154606643, 154607202, 154606740, 154606797, 154607308, 154607276, 154606705 where the changeset comment is: Whole World: the changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: duplicates of objects, undiscussed mass editing].
Syl (2024-07-29 05:10:01+00:00): Bonjour, les conteneurs installés récemment n'acceptent que les déchets alimentaires, pas les déchets verts en général. Je viens de corriger.
raspbeguy (2024-07-29 05:12:34+00:00): C'est bien ce que je craignais. Il va probablement falloir signaler ceci sur mapcomplete qui ne propose pas cette option.
emersonveenstra (2024-07-29 11:36:30+00:00): Hi there,

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304306984, did you mean to put waterway=stream since it's a linear feature?
mcliquid (2024-07-28 20:18:34+00:00): Die vorhandene ist aber nur für Autos. Ist da noch eine für Fahrräder? Dann wären zwei schon besser.
nepomuk85 (2024-07-29 08:10:51+00:00): Guter Gedanke, hatte ich gestern nicht geprüft. Bin jetzt noch einmal da gewesen und habe explizit nach Fahrradladestationen gesucht, aber nichts gefunden.
Es gibt nur am Nachbargebäude weitere Autoladestationen, die sind aber schon drin.
mcliquid (2024-07-29 08:27:32+00:00): Hätte ja sein können :) Dann passt's
OddlyAngled (2024-07-28 19:19:00+00:00): can you update the cabin numbers to be on the ref tag instead of name? this is the convention for building numbers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154534545
NieWnen (2024-07-28 21:40:00+00:00): Bardzo dużo obiektów jest tu błędnie otagowanych, co już nawet widać przez render.

Powinny być używane prefiksy `proposed:key=value` we wszystkim z wyjątkiem tagów, które używają `key=proposed` `proposed=value`, a do takich należy głównie "highway".

Mam wątpliwości co do źródła lokalizacji/nazw tych obiektów. Nie ma go ani w zestawie zmian ani w obiektach.

Tagowanie na pewno trzeba poprawić, albo zmianę wycofać i nanieść to jeszcze raz jeśli źródło jest wiarygodne i ogólnodostępne.
grzegorz75jan (2024-07-28 20:39:32+00:00): Jeżeli usuwasz nazwę sklepu to powinno się też usunąć brand.
grzegorz75jan (2024-07-28 20:46:29+00:00): Nie ma potrzeby po dodaniu każdego punktu zamykania edycji i otwierania kolejnej. Praktycznie wszystkie mogłeś wykonać w ramach jednej i wysłać na serwer za jednym razem.
eggie (2024-08-09 06:31:02+00:00): Dag Luc   Wanneer paden een waterweg kruisen dan zal er meestal een brug zijn of een duiker.

warnings:crossing_ways:highway-waterway
  	2

Wanneer je die foutmeldingen ziet probeer het op te lossen.
MVG
eggie
redd (2025-12-03 13:41:28+00:00): Hi aka252,
Ich habe den von dir erfassen Mülleimer gesucht aber nicht vorgefunden.

Kann sein dass du den auf der gegenüberliegenden Seite meinst der bereits erfasst ist?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6103698840

Grüße,

Redd
ivanbranco (2024-07-28 21:10:49+00:00): Ciao Ezio, hai ripristinato il landuse ma come =commercial invece che =retail. Era voluto o é stato un errore?
ezio_m (2024-07-29 00:04:21+00:00): è stato un errore. ops! ho appena corretto.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-28 19:30:17+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12078935195

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
YomanNH (2024-07-29 08:55:33+00:00): Cześć,

adres już był na budynku https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1104112236, więc dodanie kolejnego punktu z adresem było niepotrzebne. Usunąłem go.

Pozdrawiam
NorthCrab (2024-07-29 11:28:34+00:00): ^Zgadza się :-) !
Dorfstätte (2024-07-28 20:23:26+00:00): Sie haben aus Privatland, Gemeinschaftsgärten gemacht. Es handelt sich dabei nicht um Gemeinschaftsgärten sondern um Privatgärten.
NieWnen (2024-07-28 21:42:08+00:00): To samo co tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154534687
Dorfstätte (2024-07-28 20:23:15+00:00): Sie haben aus Privatland, Gemeinschaftsgärten gemacht. Es handelt sich dabei nicht um Gemeinschaftsgärten sondern um Privatgärten.
Peter Muret (2024-07-30 23:24:07+00:00): There is no waterfall. How can there be a waterfall when there is no river or creek?
Kenkton (2024-07-31 05:14:52+00:00): Hi Peter,
Because the stream is also not on the map. It could be that the stream isn't permanent, but I doubt that. It was large enough to assume it's a permanent feature. I think a cascade of a 20m is more accurate. A waterfall is an extreme description, but I can assure you it's there.
Peter Muret (2024-08-23 22:03:53+00:00): Thank you for your respond.
The stream is unfortunately not visible in the sat images or elevation models. So it has to be drawn into the map by visiting the place.
Kenkton (2024-08-24 10:50:30+00:00): No problem. I'm happy that someone is out there checking things are accurate, I've been on several wild goose chases in the past.
Keep up the good work.
eggie (2024-07-29 05:50:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feeedback  Dit lijkt me allemaal niet correct. Kijk eens hier hoe bomen in OSM te taggen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-07-29 06:12:32+00:00): Kijk hier wanneer je denotation gebruikt en waar dat voor is.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:denotation

Dus niet voor de naam van de boom.
Wanneer je Engelse en/of Duitse namen in OSM wil toevoegen. Waarom?

Kijk dan even hier.
    leaf_type=broadleaved
    species=Juglans regia (this is the Latin species name)
    species:en=Common Walnut
    species:de=Echte Walnuss
Gebruik species voor de latijnse naam. 

Loopt je je bomen nog even na?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-07-29 06:14:00+00:00): Loopt? > typo 'loop' svp je tagging even na.
Dorfstätte (2024-07-28 20:21:40+00:00): Sie haben aus Privatland, Gemeinschaftsgärten gemacht. Es handelt sich dabei nicht um Gemeinschaftsgärten sondern um Privatgärten.
Dacha2 (2025-12-05 05:40:37+00:00): Пожалуйста не удаляйте тег building со зданий - их же не снесли. Вводите новые теги поликлиник, детских садов и др. вручную в таблице.
Supaplex030 (2024-07-28 21:33:35+00:00): Hallo momabebra, wie schon mehrmals hingewiesen, haben Bordsteinkanten in OSM ein Richtung – die rechte Seite schaut "nach unten". Das ist in JOSM normalerweise auch am Linienstil erkennbar (die Dreiecke müssen zur Fahrbahn schauen). Du erzeugst leider weiterhin ständig Daten mit falscher Ausrichtung... lg, Alex
mavl (2024-07-30 13:44:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 154606945, 154607060, 154606852, 154606682, 154606922, 154606888, 154606817, 154607086, 154607139, 154607100, 154607116, 154606768, 154607328, 154606972, 154607347, 154607243, 154606611, 154607170, 154607000, 154607035, 154606643, 154607202, 154606740, 154606797, 154607308, 154607276, 154606705 where the changeset comment is: Whole World: the changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: duplicates of objects, undiscussed mass editing].
ielham (2024-08-25 10:34:16+00:00): Hola. Veo que has añadido unas playas en el retiro. ¿No es un poco raro marcar una playa en este lugar? Antes de eliminarlo quería comentarlo contigo y el objeto de esta edición. :)
Dorfstätte (2024-07-28 20:26:55+00:00): Sie haben aus Privatland, Gemeinschaftsgärten gemacht. Es handelt sich dabei nicht um Gemeinschaftsgärten sondern um Privatgärten.
Dorfstätte (2024-07-28 21:24:47+00:00): Sie machen einfach ein Privatbesitz irgend welche Gemeinschaftsgärten. Sie haben überhaupt gar keine Ahnung was Sie hier tun. Nehmen Sie ihre Wixgriffel von meinem Grundstück weg.
opendcc (2024-07-29 03:43:40+00:00): Hallo, willkommen auf OpenStreetMap. Um die Zusammenarbeit zu erleichtern, ist es üblich, anzugeben, was man geändert hat.  Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Hier ist zusammen mit der Waldumgrenzung auch ein Tankbehälter im Weiher versenkt worden - war wohl eher nicht die Absicht, oder?
rohieb (2024-08-30 19:21:30+00:00): Gibt es hierzu eine Quelle?
F10sh (2025-06-12 12:22:38+00:00): Das hatte ich aus dem VertiGIS Portal der Stadt. Es handelte sich wohl um ein Nutzungsbeispiel, habe es wieder entfernt: https://grundstuecksgesellschaft.braunschweig.de/gewerbegebiete/wenden-west/
rohieb (2025-06-13 17:38:13+00:00): Danke. Das VertiGIS der Stadt ist auch nicht immer als Quelle zulässig, viele der Daten sind unter Copyright (manche aber auch unter freieren Lizenzen, leider kann man das nicht immer gleich sehen…).
grzegorz75jan (2025-06-19 22:54:41+00:00): To co oznaczyłeś jako basen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304326310 nie jest obiektem stały tylko tymczasowym. Takich nie nanosimy w OSM. Tak naprawdę to obszar pradopodobnie betonowy na którym był ustawiony składany okrągły basen.
bxl-forever (2024-07-28 22:17:21+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for this.

Here is a hint for StreetComplete: Make sure to upload pending changes *before* you travel to a distant place.

It looks like you had some changes still waiting to be uploaded… which have therefore been sent along with the ones you made tonight, creating this giant box spanning across the entire country, which is an annoyance for anyone reviewing changes somewhere. :-(

Happy mapping!
rskedgell (2024-07-29 18:18:50+00:00): Then it isn't access=yes. If you don't know how to add a conditional restrictions, you can read the wiki and ask for help on the forum.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-07-29 18:53:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154576338 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by user that refuses to play by the rules; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16510
rskedgell (2024-07-29 18:35:31+00:00): No, it's harmful and useless mapping for the renderer. This time, please try reading the wiki page. Perhaps your friends @MKBE_ and @MKBE_2 can help you out?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
suchAnight (2024-08-02 16:35:32+00:00): Hello ferog_v, 
I came across some of the mapping that you have been doing in Cancun, Mexico and have a few questions that I hoped you could help me with.  I have noticed that in the oneway modifications from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680187815 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680187814 appear to be reversed in ESRI World Imagery (Clarity) Beta, as the angled parking and position of parked cars suggests way 680187814 is the entrance way. Could you confirm that by chance?

I also found that a segment of Avenida Chac Mool's (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679585831) directionality seems inconsistent with the connecting segment’s (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/577360043) directionality and the common direction of travel. Could you verify that recent edit? It is difficult to verify for me since there is no new ground imagery, just some from 2019 on the other side (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=21.195381848367006&lng=-86.88677530632697&z=15.20186893026562&pKey=187584573249249&focus=photo).

The following were not mapped by you but curious if you could help verify?:
Some residential loops just south of Avenida Kabah where it meets the trunk have oneway tags, such as on Privada Venezuela (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167490607) and Privada Brasil (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167490599). However, there are other loops nearby in the same development that may be missing oneway tags. Could you help verify if Privada Paraguay (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167490598),Privada Uruguay (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167490614), and Privada Argentina (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167490605) should have similar oneway tags? ESRI World Clarity Beta seems to suggest a oneway direction from positions of parked cars.

Lastly, I noticed some small, minor cross connectors that were left over from some of your recent classification updates, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/433003017 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679908385. I just wanted to check if you have solidified the classification scheme for the main roads before I made any changes on those type of short segments as I come across them.

But overall the changes you have made look good and seem to match the maps specified in the government documents you have mentioned. These definitely would be good for the larger Mexican community to be aware of for future consistency across all OSM users. Just wanted to see if you saw the post I made in the recently discussed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153429214, suggesting to mention the classification updates for Merida and Cancun by that government source in the Mexico Telegram page? I think it would help to get the most active users aware of the source for changes to avoid back and forth reclassifications. Thanks and let me know if I can help in any way. Best.
ferog_v (2024-08-02 17:15:20+00:00): Hi thank you for your observations. The road "Castaño" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680187815 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680187814
is indeed reversed, I must've missed that.
As is the segment of Avenida Chac Mool's (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679585831), It was my mistake

I do not have access to the roads
Privada Paraguay (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167490598),Privada Uruguay (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167490614), and Privada Argentina (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167490605)
as they're in a gated community I do not enter, but by different satélite images it does seem they're one way, the cars parked alongside them seem to go in one direction only.

I missed the connectors in my recent update, the classification of the roads alongside are correct I'll take my time setting them up, I'd appreciate your help if you see any of them.
As well as correcting the direction of the way in my recent updates.

I must've missed the email regarding the Mérida updates. The México OSM Wiki says 3 different things and are contradictory (regarding the classification of Federal "carreteras")
In one of them it mentions that this "ways" are "principal or trunks"


It would be great to settle this out as it isn't clear 

I have reclassified the ones within the city and within other towns to primary.
suchAnight (2024-08-05 21:06:39+00:00): Great! That all sounds good. As I come across minor improvements that need to be updated I will do those. And I agree that the Mexico OSM Wiki could use some specificity when it comes to classifying roads within cities and defining the size of the city for certain rules (like the trunk traffic light rule). If you would like to start the discussion with the Mexico OSM community on those points, that would be great. And if you would like our team’s perspective there, please reach out to our community lead Teddy at tahlvin@apple.com, and he can participate in Telegram policy discussions. Best!
rskedgell (2024-07-29 18:45:39+00:00): OK, so we have a bus station where *all* motor vehicles have a legal right to drive?

If you ever take and pass your driving theory test, you will hopefully have learned that a no entry sign (TSRGD diagram 616) with a plate below stating "except buses" means that no vehicle may enter except a bus.

In OSM, this is tagged as:
vehicle=no + bus=yes
No other access tags are required.

You do not need to add bicycle=no because bicycles are vehicles. You certainly do not need to add horse=no or motor_vehicle=yes because both of those statements are provably false.

https://www.bing.com/maps?toWww=1&redig=0E61462A315B4089ADF0DBB49CFAA9E5&cp=51.995766%7E-0.734393&lvl=22.0&mo=om.1&pi=0.4&style=x&dir=155.1
Tatfahren (2024-07-28 21:21:50+00:00): Quelle war "Bing"
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 19:23:11+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12079124410/history has shop = cbd that was added in this edit
shop=cbd ? What kind of shop, if any is here? See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=cannabis - is shop=cannabis intentionally not used here?
Davidos64 (2025-05-14 21:49:24+00:00): Oops I forgot that one, you can edit it
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-15 13:12:45+00:00): to shop=cannabis, right?
Davidos64 (2025-05-15 14:55:26+00:00): Yes
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-23 20:48:20+00:00): changed
VictorIE (2024-07-29 15:01:00+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304336473

There are about 6 buildings here that are duplicated. Might there have been a glitch while saving?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-28 22:20:34+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Lazurowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12079164028
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12079164029
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12079164030
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12079164031

"Koralowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12079164034
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12079164035
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12079164036

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-28 23:10:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7197350564
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7197350563
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/658122026

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2024-07-29 14:57:08+00:00): Howdy

a fence is a linear feature, landuse is an area. Please don't put both tags on the same feature
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304344837
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154541084
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-28 23:30:12+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304346110

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Raqif Mingaçuv (2024-08-08 21:07:43+00:00): Why are there Azerbaijani names in Armenia!!!!
empty_child (2024-08-09 09:44:23+00:00): Because it's an international project, like Wikipedia. Our duty - provide maps, despite our political sights
Raqif Mingaçuv (2024-08-09 16:27:35+00:00): You have been reported to the DWG for Azerbaijani nationalist vandal edits.
empty_child (2024-08-09 18:39:49+00:00): I report every vandal if I notice it in my region (Georgia). If I begin reporting in different regions, it means that my region's boundaries were triggered, and I'm in rage
Raqif Mingaçuv (2024-08-10 20:04:29+00:00): THERE IS NO REASON AN AZERBAIJANI NAME SHOULD BE IN THE TERRITORY OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AS A RESIDENTIAL AREA, there is a name tag for this name:az, THIS IS WHY YOU HAVE BEEN REPORTED TO THE DWG.
empty_child (2024-08-10 20:33:27+00:00): Man, I fed up with all this hystericus. I had one patient, who removed Russian names from local tags just for fun. A hecking pile of Azerbaijanis, who removed Armenian toponyms, and pile of Armenians, who removed Azerbaijanis ones. I hecking fed up with all these dismoraling activity. I will call DWG every time when I see breaking rules, because I invested too much time in OSM
Raqif Mingaçuv (2024-08-11 00:38:02+00:00): Listen man, what if an Abkhazian, Ossetian, or Russian, started renaming Georgian cities, how would you feel?
SomeoneElse (2024-08-15 11:57:51+00:00): Hello,
I've already added this comment to several other "conflict changesets" here.

Accusing each other of vandalism and reverting changes without discussion won't get us anywhere. Please discuss these changes on the forum together. Tags already exist there for https://community.openstreetmap.org/tag/armenia and https://community.openstreetmap.org/tag/azerbaijan .

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
jacobwhall (2024-07-29 05:43:20+00:00): This is the second of two large edits I made to Belle Isle, following a weekend of walking into spiderwebs while looking down at my phone.
jacobwhall (2024-07-29 05:44:31+00:00): The entire weekend's work can be downloaded, see this file:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jacobwhall/traces/11412791

Some of the notes may be difficult for others to read, and some of the things I mapped were from memory.
jacobwhall (2024-07-29 05:45:47+00:00): I used a fancy GPS unit borrowed from the William & Mary Center for Geospatial Analysis to complete this work.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 01:33:35+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164747491
watmildon (2024-09-19 03:16:13+00:00): Hello! I was trying to get ballot drop boxes added to the map and there's an entry that claims one at "Arapahoe County Fairgrounds". I have scoured various streetlevel and aerial imagery but cannot find it. Any chance you remember seeing one?
emersonveenstra (2024-07-30 11:57:51+00:00): Hi there,

This changeset broke a relation, if you look at the visualization here: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/320485583 you closed the way, which broke the Lolo National Forest boundary here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4459884#map=17/47.10800/-113.43045

Could you please fix this? Thanks!
jtrull (2024-07-30 14:19:33+00:00): I believe I got this fixed. Can you double check this? Thanks!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154608699
rskedgell (2024-07-29 18:36:49+00:00): This was access=no yesterday, now it doesn't exist at all?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-07-29 18:53:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154576338 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by user that refuses to play by the rules; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16510
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-29 21:36:22+00:00): Please don't delete roads
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154543427