piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Sammyhawkrad (2026-02-08 14:26:59+00:00): Hi Kofi Appiah, this one is done right except for the name. Use Title Case for place names instead of BLOCK LETTERS. I have corrected this one, but take note for future additions.
Sammyhawkrad (2026-02-08 14:33:01+00:00): Hi again, please pay attention and avoid entangling features with roads. That's not an ideal way to map.
hatul (2026-06-16 10:29:43+00:00): שלום אופיר ותודה על התוספות

היתה כבר נקודה קרובה של נרקיסים עם מידע ותמונות אז מחקתי את שלך. מומלץ לבדוק מראש לפני שמוסיפים.
בנוסף, מניח שהתכוונת להשתמש בתגית description ולא note שמיועדת רק להערות עריכה.
HAALAND_ (2026-02-08 12:07:57+00:00): 您好，我看到了您的修改与留言。我对我的编辑错误致歉，我愚昧的认为蜜雪冰城为饮料店，我了解了我的错误。感谢您的更正与提醒。但您的变更集描述是不是有点太激进了 ？我理解错了就叫胡乱修改？每个mapper都有可能在编辑的时候犯错误吧。还有，这跟我是手机编辑有什么关系？在说一嘴，我不会打编辑战的。
Taksine (2026-02-08 12:51:34+00:00): （磕头）小的有眼无珠，还请大人开恩！我错误把你当成了那一群“无法沟通”的手机编辑用户了，对不起！（磕头）
HAALAND_ (2026-02-08 13:11:06+00:00): （不必）没事没事，不过我对您说的“无法沟通的手机编辑用户”感到好奇，可否链接几个例子和几个用户主页链接呢，我将不胜感激
Taksine (2026-02-13 03:37:35+00:00): 好，我私信跟你说。
橘ヒカリ (2026-02-10 07:04:13+00:00): 感谢更改，帮大忙了……真没时间跟新人辩经什么是“铁路线路的基础建设属性”。
ion_chi (2026-02-09 20:53:34+00:00): I combined the two nodes here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178330098
NeisBot (2026-02-08 09:24:42+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/775678101 v2 | 8 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7236401029 v2
https://osm.org/node/7236401030 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178251263
Timmy_Tesseract (2026-02-25 01:24:09+00:00): Good morning. It looks like you accidentally dragged some building nodes here and mixed up tags of several different objects.

Based on the tag changes that you made it seems that you tried to move a computer repair shop from a building in Berkeley Heights to a new building (Unitown Center) in Sitio Aratan? I tried to fix the issues in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179013685

Please kindly double-check position and tags of the two buildings and the computer repair shop. Thanks!
NeisBot (2026-02-08 09:25:26+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/250250974 v7

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Vape shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
SubsonicAcorn (2026-02-08 11:35:49+00:00): This has been addressed in a recent change. Thanks bot :)
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-08 11:38:45+00:00): Thanks for removing the description.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178261774
Berdly (2026-02-15 07:12:46+00:00): Phenomenal changeset, I love seeing these ancient towns detailed! It really brings attention to them and nails in the point that they’re some of the most beautiful and dense (and pedestrian friendly!) towns in the US! 💕
Ewen Hill (2026-02-08 21:38:15+00:00): Nice work Donmac
VLD549 (2026-03-10 15:29:16+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. Could you provide a link of some sort that shows that the business is still running? When I search for it, it is mentioned that Northern Dumpling is permanently closed.

Thank you.
NaufalFarras (2026-02-08 18:59:37+00:00): Halo. FamilyMart Sukajadi belum dibuka. Alangkah lebih baik dipetakan setelah store tersebut dibuka.
Rakkka (2026-02-12 02:11:29+00:00): 「関西学院千里国際中等部・高等部」のノードが違う場所に移動しています。修正をお願いします。
わくわくジャーニー (2026-02-12 04:49:00+00:00): 実際のキャンパスの位置へとノードを移動、修正いたしました。
ご指摘ありがとうございます。
Joseph R P (2026-02-10 00:55:15+00:00): It looks like the way 145182578 is the current open ramp, 1408458573 is the currently closed/under-construction future realignment of the current ramp, and 1475194125 might be construction vehicle access. 1475194126 appears to be a temporarily realignment linking 215 South to Far Hills while the original ramp is being reconstructed.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-02-10 07:22:48+00:00): That's very weird... Which of these will "survive" the construction phase? I was genuinely surprised that OpenWeb, after displaying data from Jan. 31, 2026, showed me that Far Hills got involved in the construction... OSM has a policy of "not mapping temporary features" (technically, everything's temporary, but that's besides the point), but I'm unsure if these new roads would fall into that category or not.
Joseph R P (2026-02-10 19:18:26+00:00): I think the awkwardly short Far Hills Ave exit ramp could stay since it is a drastic realignment from the old ramp. If they weren't completely rebuilding the actual ramp or the temp alignment was much closer to the original, that's a case in which I wouldn't bother having it on the map. The old ramp can be tagged as under-construction with demolished or to-be-demolished segments tagged as such or even deleted. 

I would tag the new ramp between Far Hills and Summerlin Pkwy as under-construction until it opens to traffic and delete the construction access road between 215 North and the current exit ramp.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-02-12 21:55:42+00:00): Okay, I modified the intersection based on my best interpretation of your response. How does it look now?
Joseph R P (2026-02-13 15:50:15+00:00): Everything looks accurate to the current construction now. Only change I made here was removing a temporary road that seems to only be an access road for construction vehicles.
jack walker2 (2026-02-08 06:53:33+00:00): 注：秦皇岛市大量建筑物都是10年前增加的，10年时间城市变化日新月异，需要大刀阔斧的对这些老旧及错误数据进行矫正与修改
karr4s (2026-05-14 13:15:24+00:00): Bonjour,
Pour info : un POI existait déjà pour ce salon. Peut être que Organic Maps n'était pas à jour quand vous l'avez ajouté.
J'ai supprimé celui-ci et j'ai mis à jour le POI existant, notamment en ajoutant le compte Instagram et le site internet. ;)
Znaika (2026-02-08 10:18:44+00:00): Hi Muhmaker, 
Mapper (BSM) Stanka hat noch keiner angeschrieben, wenn er hier vieles kaputtmacht. Er ist neu bei OSM. Er hat hier z.B. neue Knoten für Plattformen angelegt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178181363
Nun ist es doppelt (als Area und als Knoten). In meiner Stadt sehe ich auch solche doppelte Einträge (als Knoten und als Linien). Oder es gibt einen Mix. Das Problem kommt bei StreetComplete, wenn es Daten zur Ergänzung oder Überprüfung abfragt. Dann macht es auch doppelt oder es kommt zu unterschiedlichen Angaben z.B. bei dem Knoten (shelter=yes, bench=yes) und der Linie (shelter=no, bench=no).
Ich glaube, für OsmAnd wären Knoten besser, dann sieht man sogar ein Dach am Symbol, wenn eine Haltestelle einen überdachten Wartebereich hat. 
Gruß, Znaika
Znaika (2026-02-08 10:23:02+00:00): P.S. Du machst viel mit Buslinien, ich nur nebenbei. Vielleicht könntest du es klären oder auch sagen, was besser ist, um solche Fälle zu vermeiden. Danke
Muhmaker (2026-02-08 19:09:06+00:00): Hi Znaika,
ich habe dieses Doppel-Mapping von platforms leider auch schon an vielen Orten in allen denkbaren Varianten gesehen. Dieses Durcheinander ist  wohl historisch gewachsen und ich habe auch noch keinen erfolgreichen Vorschlag gesehen wie man das mal sauber vereinheitlichen könnte. Aktuell werden wohl auch viele punktförmige highway=bus_stop durch Aufforderung von iD mit public_transport=platform versehen auch wenn es Linien oder Flächen platforms an der Haltestelle gibt. StreetComplete fordert dann dazu alle platforms mit Eigenschaften zu füllen. Unterschiedliche Nutzer zu verschieden Zeitpunkten führen dann gerne mal zu widersprüchlichen Angaben. Ich interessiere mich aber eher für korrekte Routen-Relationen. Allerdings weiß ich auch dort nicht ob es "richtiger" ist Punkt- oder Linien-platforms aufzunehmen. Nur beides zusammen für einen Halt in der Routen-Relation sehe ich als Fehler an. Das würde ja eigentlich zwei Halte an der gleichn Haltestelle bedeuten. Ich orientiere mich in der Regel daran wie der Rest der Route erfasst ist und versuch so wenig wie möglich zu ändern und nur eindeutige Fehler zu beheben. Mit einer klaren Empfehlung bezüglich des platform Objekts an neue Maper tue ich mich schwer. Das Problem bei den Edits von (BSM) Stanka war glaube ich oft, dass bestehende platforms gelöscht und dann neu gezeichnet wurden. Ich werde das auch noch etwas beobachten und dann ggf. ein paar Hinweise geben. Aber meine Motivation für langwierige detailierte Erklärungen der OSM-ÖPNV Geheimnisse ist leider nicht sehr groß nach einigen ernüchternden Erfahrungen mit anderen Mappern.
Gruß, Muhmaker
Znaika (2026-02-08 19:33:42+00:00): Alles klar. Danke dir. Dann versuchen wir das Beste daraus zu machen
scruss (2026-02-08 22:30:00+00:00): why not delete the whole relation? The rails have gone, nothing is travelling on it
t_ja (2026-02-08 20:49:42+00:00): Ahoj,
na zaklade coho si preznacil cestu cez Brodno ako rychlostnu cestu? Slovenska sprava ciest ju stale eviduje ako cestu prvej triedy, a az do postavenia novej cesty prvej triedy popri zeleznici to tak aj ostane, co znamena este peknych par rokov...
Nehovoriac o tom, ze po dostavani D3 z toho bude dialnica, a nie highway=trunk.
Vzhladom na to, ze v OpenStreetMap mapujeme realitu, ta poprosim o dolozenie nejakeho dokazu, ze je na danom useku osadena znacka rychlostnej cesty. V opacnom pripade to zmen naspaet, aby to suhlasilo s realitou.

T.
A67-A67 (2026-02-08 08:13:52+00:00): Alle tankstations en laadpunten van BP in Nederland zijn overgenomen door OK. De laadpunten hebben nog wel het merk bp pulse (brand), maar de operator is OK geworden.
jonathand299 (2026-02-08 12:35:25+00:00): Alright, fair enough. Not sure if the name suggestion index needs to be updated to ensure they get the correct brand and operator tags then
A67-A67 (2026-02-09 18:16:54+00:00): I've added all the correct operator to all changing stations and charge points with brand=bp pulse in the Netherlands. The NSI often keeps brand and operator separated, so then that won't be a problem.

The NSI isn't a validation tool. It just gives suggestions that should be checked before changing. In the Netherlands I see many errors due to accepting NSI suggestions blindly without checking.
jonathand299 (2026-02-10 07:02:29+00:00): Yes, but what I mean is that NSI is for keeping tagging consistent. For other countries it is setting both brand and operator to be "bp pulse". If it's different operator in the Netherlands then that should be put in NSI to ensure it remains consistent, otherwise different mappers will have different ideas of how to tag them, without realising it's different in the Netherlands.
aceman444 (2026-06-14 11:53:29+00:00): Zdravim, cely areal https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1180972564 ste vymazat nemuseli, zrejme bude nadalej patrit firme Innovatrics a je mozne ho nejak jednotne oznacit.
Znaika (2026-02-08 12:33:30+00:00): Was ist das? Ist es ein Raum im Gebäude? Dann sollte es dort gesetzt werden und nicht an der Ecke
VLD0251 (2026-02-09 18:34:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution! "مخبزة" is a generic term and should not be used as a proper noun. if there is no official name on the sign, it is best to remove the tag name=*
See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dbakery
Happy mapping!
Warin61 (2026-02-08 08:25:16+00:00): Source - should add LINZ Imagery for area.
Elefant aus Wuppertal (2026-02-08 18:39:38+00:00): Hallo,

zwischen Remscheid-Lüttringhausen und Remscheid-Lennep fahren bereits ab dem 9. Februar wieder Züge, ich denke nicht, dass dieser Abschnitt auch auf construction gesetzt werden sollte.
silly_goose (2026-02-09 12:27:33+00:00): Ja dann! Danke dir!
Bin tatsächlich stumpf davon ausgegangen, dass da auch noch gebaut wird.

Ich nehme die S7 dann zwischen Lüttringhausen und Lennep raus.
eggie (2026-02-08 09:42:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-08 09:45:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Wanneer je een huisnummer gaat veranderen zal één adres uit de data zijn en een ander adres twee keer voorkomen.
Je zou dit nog even kunnen checken. Beter een adresnode ontdoen van bedrijfsinfo en op de nieuwe adresnode bijtaggen. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-08 10:09:57+00:00): Muntplein 16 zou hier zijn
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=muntplein+16&objectId=0356200000018202&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=133732.99056485004&geometry.y=450411.0001646791&zoomlevel=13.92
eggie (2026-02-08 10:11:40+00:00): .. en heeft een andere postcode
stasiu512 (2026-05-26 19:37:31+00:00): Cześć, jesteś pewny że https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105883055 znajduje się poza strefą zamieszkania? Gdzie w takim razie znajduje się znak dla wjeżdżających do strefy w okolicach skrzyżowania z Wołkowyską? Aktualna sytuacja trochę utrudnia rozstrzygnięcie pierwszeństwa przejazdu na skrzyżowaniu.
theDM (2026-05-26 22:03:45+00:00): Cześć jestem pewien. Ta droga została wyłączona ze strefy zamieszkania, ale została oznaczona strefą ruchu.
actnogeni (2026-02-08 08:56:31+00:00): s
Frans S (2026-02-11 11:47:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178256723
silversurfer83 (2026-02-08 13:41:19+00:00): Hi :)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1475211267 can be a better circle if you use the "O" (letter o) key to make a circle. 

happy mapping :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178257078
eggie (2026-02-08 13:29:23+00:00): Lijkt me oke..  Ik heb PostNL toegevoegd als operator.
Gr eggie
Tris_1220 (2026-02-08 13:23:56+00:00): Kurze Frage, warum hast du "emergency=designated" von https://www.osm.org/way/1024639095 und https://www.osm.org/way/1075403213 entfernt? Sind die Wege keine Rettungszufahrt mehr?
WalterSchwarz (2026-02-08 13:47:52+00:00): die sind nur als Fusswege, nicht aber als Rettungszufahrten definiert
olo81 (2026-02-10 06:42:57+00:00): Do wycofania, tagowanie niezgodne z wytycznymi 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:maxspeed?uselang=pl
Frans S (2026-02-08 11:34:54+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

tag (short) side roads leading to a business as a highway=service

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178258941
TheSwavu (2026-02-08 22:00:06+00:00): Congrats,

The only ones that beat five via ways are at the peanut https://osm.org/go/uN97BZV8_ 

Any idea why the left turning buses are supposed to be on the right exiting the bus stop?
Scottie0001 (2026-02-09 00:16:05+00:00): Buses that exit the slip lane at the bus stop opposite Gipps St/Kemp Pl continue onto the slip lane (where the turn restiction is) due to the traffic signal setup at the previous intersection, then go into each of the seperate lanes. Buses that continue along Ann Street go when the main through traffic on Ann Street has a green signal. The traffic that is continuing onto Queen Street waits for a green signal where all the other traffic on Ann Street has a red so they are able to safely get from one side of the street to the other without causing a crash or similar.

It's a bit of an interesting but smart layout they have there
TheSwavu (2026-02-09 08:58:18+00:00): Thanks for that.

So I assume they can wait away from the platform for their own signal. I guess that the bus stop is not currently active, I can't find it in the GTFS.
eggie (2026-02-08 12:38:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback In OSM hoef je geen adressen toe te voegen. Die zijn al aanwezig in de vorm van adresnodes.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
b-holdet (2026-02-11 13:50:40+00:00): Er Farø nu også en Ø, eller er det en Halvø?

Hvordan vil du definere en Ø i forhold til en Halvø og gør en dæmning sig ikke ud for at Farø er landfast?
osmviborg (2026-02-11 21:06:10+00:00): Halvø: https://info.dataforsyningen.dk/stednavne2/1233766a-08a9-6b98-e053-d480220a5a3f/Farø
fntamap (2026-02-08 16:44:28+00:00): Should the building be made member of the relation "Ottignies" grouping the parts of the station ?
bxl-forever_repair (2026-02-08 18:24:59+00:00): No, stop_area relations are not meant for this.
fntamap (2026-02-09 09:54:04+00:00): On this page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dstation
the station building is indeed member of the relation.
bxl-forever_repair (2026-02-09 22:25:57+00:00): I wrote to the author of that picture, because the illustrtation neither matches the definition nor the standard practice.

I have already seen strange situations where people use the stop_area relations to include a lot of things, like shops inside stations and more, but AFAIK no app is able to use any of that.  Did you have a specific use in mind to include this building specifically?

IMHO, the most useful action might be to make sure that pedestrian navigation works well between the street, the station building and the train platforms + add relevant details like ticket offices or ticket machines in the new building, if any.
fntamap (2026-02-10 16:17:29+00:00): I have nothing special in mind, I just want to tag things as correctly as possible. In those two pages : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_area and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Public_Transport, one can find a table of the recommended members of a stop_area relation, and both list the station building. So I have no reason to think that it would be a bad idea.
It is also said that such a relation may include elements pertaining to different modes of public transportation. Since Ottignies also has a platform for busses (not yet mapped, but I am working on it), it could be added to the picture.
And I am trying to keep the pedestrian navigation continuous, despite the frequent changes caused by the works in progress. Next work is to add the services inside the temporary station.
bxl-forever_repair (2026-02-10 20:28:20+00:00): There is a difference between "building=train_station", which is *just* a building, and "public_transport=station", which is the logical point to determine the name and location of the station on the map.  Only the object with "public_transport=station" is relevant here.

In the early days of OSM and in some areas of the world where only a very basic mapping style is used, it was common to map railway stations with just one single object and put all the tags to the same one (building and public_transport=station).  That is was the wiki says, when the table says "The station building/area".  But we don’t do this in Belgium any more, where all the stations have been mapped as logical nodes for more than 10 years.  This is why stop_area relations include those nodes + railway platforms + railway stop position nodes.

That being said, if you really want to see that building inside the stop_area relation, add it (without a role).  As I tried to tell you, I am not aware that any app can make any use of that object, but I guess it won’t do any harm either.
fntamap (2026-02-11 10:23:44+00:00): Maybe I start to see the light. In my active life, now vanishing in the distant past, I worked with standards from official bodies, like ISO, IEC, CIE, IEEE, IETF. While not devoid of defects, most standards where rather complete and consistent. When a standard includes many options, it is customary to define and publish profiles, sets of options to be used by a class of users.
The standards of OpenStreetMap are developed in a very haphazard way, and are therefore often inconsistent. So it seems that a profile has been defined for mapping railways in Belgium. Since it is not published, one can only discover its existence by committing a sin against it, and being corrected by someone knowing better.
As for the position of the main point, it seems to be variable: in Leuven, for example, it sits in the middle of the station building.
So: I defined the building as train_station, removed the main entry from the stop_area relation, and, as an exercise, created the missing stop_area relation for the station in Céroux-Mousty. I hope that the result is now conformant.
NeisBot (2026-02-09 07:15:48+00:00): Hello sadek4, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/13533880701

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178259370
Frans S (2026-02-08 11:11:20+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178259383
Frans S (2026-02-08 11:07:38+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178259386