piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PluMGMK (2026-04-25 18:19:55+00:00): I had completely forgotten about this. https://www.kirbygroup.com/project/kylemore-way-bess-ireland/ mentions "110V DC battery systems", so I must have picked up that number. It's a bit vague though, maybe that's referring to something else in the compound…
VictorIE (2026-04-25 18:31:52+00:00): "battery systems" is plural, which suggests it is the main equipment, not a back-up system.

I went looking and some systems are 200-800 V, so 110 isn't completely implausible, it just needs a very big transformer coil. :)
streckenkundler (2024-11-09 10:31:18+00:00): Du irrst hier! 
Das Amt (AL=7) hat keinen Zusatz "(Oderbruch)", die Gemeinde Golzow (al=8) auch nicht! Vergleiche Adrministrative Grenzen: https://bb-viewer.geobasis-bb.de/?layerIDs=237,9001,9000,160,159&visibility=true,true,true,true,true&transparency=0,0,0,0,0&center=465142.65363455965,5825260.117434881&zoomlevel=7
und Hauptsatzung: https://daten.verwaltungsportal.de/dateien/legalframework/5/3/3/5/6/Hauptsatzung_06.11.2024.pdf

Welche Quelle ist dein angeblicher "official_name"?
streckenkundler (2024-11-09 11:26:16+00:00): Auch das Ortsschild kenn den von dir erfundenen Namen nicht: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=645607317640267
Ich hab den wieder entfernt und auch den Ortspunkt korrigiert...
Taksine (2024-11-09 08:13:44+00:00): 这一块用干线道路不对吧，它又不是什么国道
NM$L (2024-11-10 16:43:31+00:00): Hi, it's struggle to apply highway=trunk for all these road. Could you explain why you tagging it?
Karma Howlin (2025-02-04 07:06:42+00:00): Thanks for correcting road level.
Cause I'm not sure after organized the road, so make it open to discussion.
nevw (2024-11-10 07:34:42+00:00): Multipolygons cannot have shared edges. fixed.
aharvey (2025-02-06 11:09:21+00:00): hi could you please document your source of these building heights? It's a bit hard to claim you're "fixing" them without backing up how you came to these results?

Also for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466884767/history I set both ele and height, so that you can obtain the elevation of the top of the building, which could make 3D rendering more accurate as you're less dependent on the DEM, adjusting just the height without changing the ele would move the top of the building elevation.
DeOnlyR (2025-02-06 11:45:02+00:00): Hi, all building heights are sourced from skyscrapercentre.com which source their information from architectural plans of the building.
View Tower for example is shown to be 107m in height above ground level:
https://www.skyscrapercenter.com/building/metro-view-residences/13403

Regarding your second paragraph, does this mean that to make 3D rendering more accurate, the number that I input in the height tag should be the ele (90) + height (107) (so 197), or just the height input (107) from the source?
Thanks for your help.
aharvey (2025-02-06 13:45:55+00:00): It's nice to see the interest in improving our building heights data, however you can't use proprietary data when editing OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright#Proprietary_data.

While sourcing a fact might be okay, in this case doing a bulk sourcing of their database is not okay. While their licensing terms at https://www.ctbuh.org/about/faq mention "public use" this is unclear.
DeOnlyR (2025-02-06 20:26:33+00:00): It is a non-profit organisation which clearly states that all information on the website is for public use apart from their drawings and externally submitted photographs. I do not see how this is "unclear" in terms of public usage of their data.

"All information provided on the CTBUH Tall Building Database is available for public use and inclusion within research if applicable citations referencing the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (CTBUH) are made. Please note that while CTBUH Tall Building Database data is available for public use, images are not." 

It is clearly stated that elevation diagrams on the same building page where I source all my data, is not for public use.

"All diagrammatic elevations on building profile pages are produced and owned by CTBUH. To utilize these in a collaborative research activity with CTBUH, please contact research@ctbuh.org. For utilization in news publications, please contact press@ctbuh.org."
https://www.ctbuh.org/about/faq

Since the company clearly states that the diagrams and photos specifically are not for public use, while data, which can be found on the same page, is specifically singled out as "for public use" it is easily concluded that sourcing from their database (if citations are included, that is a fail on my part and I will correct them) is clearly acceptable.

I will update the tags add the source for each building I have changed.
aharvey (2025-02-06 22:43:56+00:00): While it's good they do include some information about the use of their data, I still feel "public use" is not clear enough. For example if I build their data into my commercial product and sell it, is that public use? because it's totally okay to do that with OSM data.

Even with regards to attribution, we usually confirm that a listing on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors is sufficient, because we can't guarantee each item will directly include attribution.
aharvey (2025-02-07 22:54:14+00:00): I reached out to CTBUH and heard back that "Republication of our data for commercial use in not allowed." and they did not provide a waiver to this, therefore on this basis the data is incompatible with OSM. We'll need to go through and remove all instances where you copied this data previously, and please going forward don't use their data as a source.

For building heights i would recommend other sources like compatible LIDAR data, a physical survey, or photogrametry.
aharvey (2025-02-08 11:18:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162275408
aharvey (2025-02-09 04:50:13+00:00): As an update I've finished reviewing all your prior edits and have reverted either fully or manually the data I strongly believe or you have stated to have been copied from the CTBUH proprietary database.
une abeille (2024-11-09 13:54:24+00:00): Hi, and thanks for drawing in missing buildings. Could you please make sure to use the correct offset (0.6,-1.54) for Bing imagery so that your work aligns with that of other mappers? Thanks!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:05:18+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659356
Glassman (2024-11-09 18:31:21+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158918813
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-06-06 09:03:51+00:00): Incorrect no_straight_on restriction
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18266820
Glassman (2024-11-09 18:31:42+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158919015
fndoder (2024-11-11 10:56:28+00:00): Валидатор верно выявил ошибку несвязности дорожного графа tertiary и выше, а вот исправление в этом пакете правок оказалось не совсем правильным.

Фактически дорога достроена и открыта. И это действительно tertiary, так как это основная дорога из большого жилого района теперь.

Вернул из construction обратно в tertiary и скорректировал уровни вокруг для связности графа.
Glassman (2024-11-09 18:32:19+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158919250
JeroenHoek (2024-11-21 21:30:16+00:00): Zou je je ook willen inlezen in wegenclassificaties? Dat stukje weg moet wel tertiary zijn, want het ligt tussen de afrit van een trunk en een tertiary in. Laat bij twijfel alles boven tertiary maar staan zoals het is.
earlyistimeless (2024-11-22 00:23:38+00:00): Ik kan me nog herinneren dat ik het stukje weg eerst over het hoofd had gezien en mee had geselecteerd met de nu service roads; waarna ik blijkbaar de classificatie verkeerd heb "teruggezet".
Glassman (2024-11-09 18:44:18+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158919443
mcliquid (2024-11-09 07:32:38+00:00): Review: Das Hotel steht bereits zum Verkauf, würde die Fläche löschen. (Hast du ja bereits)
nevw (2024-11-10 07:33:40+00:00): Multipolygons cannot have shared edges. fixed
Glassman (2024-11-09 18:36:24+00:00): That residential street is likely a driveway which is tagged as highway=service + service=driveway. See https://www.skagitcounty.net/Maps/iMap/?mapjs=parcel which does not show a residential street there. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158919619
Glassman (2024-11-09 18:37:11+00:00): We don't really use the tiger tags anymore. They can be ignored.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158919665
JeroenHoek (2024-11-09 09:02:31+00:00): Als dat hek daar zo klopt, dan zou ik private alleen na het hek doen, en het stukje ervoor niet.
earlyistimeless (2024-11-09 15:50:49+00:00): Hé Jeroen, 

Het hek betreft twee gemetselde vierkante pilaren met een een hek ertussen. En aan het begin van de weg naar de boerderij bevindt zich een "eigen weg" bordje, wat duidt op privébezit.
earlyistimeless (2024-11-09 15:57:58+00:00): Hé Jeroen, na "  Clarification of the term “private”   " even door te hebben gelezen, lijk je toch gelijk te hebben. Ik pas het even aan
JeroenHoek (2024-11-09 17:15:45+00:00): Klopt, privébezit (eigen weg) is ook vaak access=permissive, pas met een hek (wat ook regelmatig dicht is) of een bordje verboden toegang wordt het duidelijk access=private.

Bij een erf of woning is het juist fijn om niet gelijk access=private te pakken, omdat ook pakketdiensten, bezorgers, etc. daarmee buitengesloten worden.
Glassman (2024-11-09 18:38:23+00:00): Is this like a trail or a sidewalk? If it's like a trail then use highway=path otherwise highway=footway is correct.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158919725
Glassman (2024-11-09 18:39:26+00:00): Isn't that Lake Shannon? Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158919826
Glassman (2024-11-09 18:42:56+00:00): Docks are typically tagged as man_made=pier see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dpier A dock is an area for ships or boats where the water level can be managed, like a dry dock. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddock

Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158919885
flohoff (2024-11-09 11:11:27+00:00): Moin,
irgendeiner deiner Changsets hat zu routingänderungen auf der A2 geführt:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=730839,880956

Du verwendest leider keine changeset kommentar so das es ziemlich schwierig ist nachzuvollziehen welcher deiner Changesets ursächlich sein müsste.

Ich werde die mal einzeln durchsehen.

Flo
M!Cado (2024-11-09 11:35:37+00:00): Hi,
Danke für den Hinweis.
Es geht vermutlich um diese drei Wegstrecken:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37528333
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23307848
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23307847
Diese ware als gesperrt markiert,. allerdings nicht mehr existent. 
Ich habe diese auf "Construction" gesetzt, da an dieser Stelle vermutlich auch der Tunnel entstehen wird.
Ich kann das gerne wieder zurücksetzen?
flohoff (2024-11-10 17:00:41+00:00): Ich habe keine ahnung - Ich bin da nicht vor Ort.

Ich hab auch nichts offensichtliches finden können was da falsch ist.

Changeset kommentare wären schon schön.

Flo
didier2020 (2024-11-09 06:14:29+00:00): rarad74 request :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158904123
SzymonH (2024-11-09 12:53:34+00:00): Te drogi nie zostały otwarte.
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-09 17:05:14+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158942298
NeisBot (2024-11-09 07:54:40+00:00): Hello Pibby59, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1332139957

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=158921957
Pibby59 (2024-11-09 08:15:11+00:00): Yea, sorry
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-09 17:05:29+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158942313
Glassman (2024-11-09 18:46:40+00:00): This road was already tagged as access=no which is basically a closed road. Not sure what the tag proposal:Closed Roads=rd even means.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158922048
Glassman (2024-11-09 18:48:27+00:00): The path should be connected to another way, like the service road. Connecting them allows routers to use them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158922455
Robot8A (2024-11-13 12:59:42+00:00): Los edificios 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1332143967 y
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317203843
se están superponiendo, algo ha ido mal en esta manzana.
lanxana_imports (2025-01-11 15:02:55+00:00): Después de subir la tarea me di cuenta que no había cargado los datos previos. Me pasó en esta y una o dos manzana más de la zona. Se pueden revertir.
Glassman (2024-11-09 18:49:50+00:00): Like the path, this node should be connect to a road, likely Neil Road Southeast. Can you fix this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158922670
Minh Nguyen (2024-11-09 09:00:38+00:00): This updates the boundary to reflect the land swap effective October 30. [1]

I took the coordinates specified in the unsigned draft compact [2], which match the signed and executed compact [3]. This work is in the public domain as an edict of government. [4] Since the coordinates are given in NAD27, I used NCAT [5] to convert them to NAD83(2011) and QGIS to convert them to WGS84 [6].

[1] https://www.texastribune.org/2024/11/07/texas-oklahoma-border-change-lake-texoma/
[2] https://www.ntmwd.com/DocumentCenter/View/2797/Amended-and-Restated-Texoma-Area-Boundary-Agreement-Proposed
[3] https://static.texastribune.org/media/files/b983c74d2b8a295a5f85ddbdf7dccb57/2024%20Texoma%20Area%20Boundary%20Agreement.pdf
[4] https://copyright.gov/comp3/chap300/ch300-copyrightable-authorship.pdf#page=37
[5] https://geodesy.noaa.gov/NCAT/
[6] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_transform_data_from_NAD83_to_WGS84
AndySchulte (2024-11-12 06:35:20+00:00): Hallo shogun, bist du dir da sicher mit deiner Lagenanpassung der A17? Wenn man das Saxony WebAtlasSN darunter legt, was m.M.n. sehr gut zum Rest der OSM Daten passt, sind im Verlauf der A17 im Tunnelbereich starke Verschiebungen zu sehen.

Gruß Andy
shogun (2024-11-12 16:13:34+00:00): Hallo, ich habe gerade nochmal geschaut, die Tunnelröhren haben einen Querschnitt von 15,40 m und die Brücken haben einen Abstand Mitte - Mitte von 25 bis 26 Metern. Laut WebAtlasSN aber nur 15 m. Ich habe die Spuren also versucht parallel zu machen (25-26m) und den Verlauf geglättet. Vor der Brücke Weißeritztalbrücke zeigt WebAtlasSN einen starken Haken, den es so wie ich ein paar mal entlang gefahren bin, nicht gibt. Ich habe mich nach der Webseite: https://www.daub-ita.de/projektdatenbank/deutschland/tunnel-doelzschen-und-tunnel-coschuetz/  orientiert. Ich weiß, es ist nicht perfekt, aber ich habe es versucht.  
Gruß shogun
xaybietthuvn (2024-11-09 09:12:27+00:00): https://xaybietthu.vn/bang-gia-xay-biet-thu/
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1NtaGEli_RkiZgPFcLQlP_w9S526gu09U
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1BEdg4K2cBhsotfTF1WhK5l6c48h01jZBu9gb7-4q7Ck/edit?usp=drivesdk
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/15yvY0UZTaLm9cxkdRccIW5BXnArwO7LQ
https://sites.google.com/view/xaybieththuvn/bang-gia-xay-biet-thu
https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=10a9NzXZ3icrYqJUa-zsE0YWXHVwdpiM
https://xaybietthudainguyen.blogspot.com/2024/11/gia-xay-biet-thu.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_CpjJLdMJs
https://x.com/xaybietthuvn/status/1854824291747217589
https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/xy-bit-th-i-nguyn/episodes/Bo-Gi-Xy-Dng-Bit-Th-Cp-Nht-Mi-Nht-2025-e2qoh83
https://www.scoop.it/topic/xay-biet-thu-ai-nguyen/p/4162224417/2024/11/08/bao-gia-xay-dung-biet-thu-tron-goi-moi-nhat-2024
Yitzchak M (2024-11-30 20:12:53+00:00): היי. אני חבר בקבוצת
 OSM_ISRAEL (TELEGRAM)
 ושמנו לב על התיוג שלך לקיוסק הזה:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12325527902#map=19/32.005161/34.945028
אנחנו מבינים איך אתה עשוי לחשוב שזו אטרקציה, אבל על פי הכללים של או.אס.אם. זה באמת לא אטרקציה. התיוג הנכון הוא:
amenity=cafe
street_vendor=yes
אנחנו מבקשים שתמחק את התג "tourism=attraction".
זכר: אחד הכללים החשובים ביותר של או.אס.אם. הוא "אל תתייג עבור האפליקציה". 
Don't map for the renderer
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer
התיוג חייב להיות מדויק כך שהוא יכול לשמש את כל האפליקציות המבוססות על  או.אס. אם. נכון, לא כל האפליקציות מראות הכל.
אנחנו נעריך מאוד את שיתוף הפעולה שלך בתיקון התיוג ל "נקודה"  זו.
תודה!
stianjensen (2024-12-18 15:07:23+00:00): This change seems to have deleted the toll booth placed in Tanangerveien, and I can't see that one is restored in a later changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7980805095

From what I can find, that toll booth is still active.
Zrop (2024-11-09 12:20:20+00:00): Hallo mima3000,
der Aldi war hier schon eingetragen. Ich habe den doppelten Eintrag wieder gelöscht.

Gruß
Zrop
MaliMrav (2024-11-09 23:35:10+00:00): Hi upc92, this changeset looks problematic to me.

It seems that you partially added footpaths around 100 graves on Novo Bežanijsko Groblje (cemetary), with very bad geometry. I don't see much value in adding footpaths between every single grave, it will just make the map look convoluted. And only on one small segment of graveyard? There are 10s of thousends of graves on that cemetary, do you have any plans for the others?

Please join Serbian OSM community Telegram channel or forum to discuss this issue.
upc92 (2024-11-10 09:53:49+00:00): Ognjen, Please give some time to load other things. Our next thing is to edit Сомбор.
soliMM (2024-11-11 10:28:01+00:00): upc92, maybe before "loading other things" you should first take time and answer MaliMrav questions.

While I'm here I would also like to ask you about names you added on parks.

Here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162684518#map=19/44.803567/20.375706 you have added name "Park Blok 62", meawhile on this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237141498 you have added "Block 63 park". 

Why is one on Serbia and other one, I guess on English? Do they even have names, as in did you confirm it on the ground?
upc92 (2024-11-18 11:55:44+00:00): I will use the name in Serbian Latin.

Just to restore it.

Your Stefan. 😊
Jrachi (2024-11-10 07:01:43+00:00): Ciao.
Sono di nuovo a chiedere se ti serve aiuto per evitare di creare e cancellare relazioni continuamente.
Sempre che tu sia in grado di leggere i messaggi.

Ivo
eggie (2024-11-09 19:28:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
ivanbranco (2024-11-20 12:00:51+00:00): Hi Stefan,

something went wrong here, the wikidata value contains the OSM node id. Could you take a look at it please? Thanks and good mapping
ivanbranco (2024-11-20 12:09:00+00:00): Forget about it, I found the correct Q-Item!
bxl-forever (2024-11-09 12:46:52+00:00): OK pour ajouter le magasin, mais svp ne jamais écrire les adresses sur les magasins eux-mêmes, OSM = database géographique qui associe déjà automatiquement les adresses = ne pas créer de valeurs doubles, merci.
eggie (2024-11-09 20:28:12+00:00): Dag Cedric,

Wanneer hier niets meer is en er wordt gebouw is het oke.

MVG
eggie
mcliquid (2024-11-09 11:50:27+00:00): Hallo und vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag,

bitte beachte jedoch: Changesets sollten lokal sein.

In deinem Fall bitte vor dem Ortswechsel immer alle Änderungen in OsmAnd hochladen!

Um Konflikte zu vermeiden und aus Höflichkeit gegenüber anderen wird empfohlen:
• Änderungen in einem kleinen geografischen Bereich zu kombinieren (innerhalb einer Stadt, eines Bezirks oder einer Provinz)
• Änderungen innerhalb desselben Landes zu halten
• Änderungen hochzuladen/speichern, bevor man in einem anderen Gebiet weiterkartiert

Warum? Schau dir den Abschnitt "Geographische Größe von Changesets" auf dieser Wiki-Seite an:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Danke für die Berücksichtigung, einen schönen Tag noch und fröhliches Mappen!
Hegau Bodensee (2025-08-12 15:08:50+00:00): Hallo mcliquid,

vielen Dank für die Ausführung.
Ich werde die Bitte zukünftig berücksichtigen.

Grüße
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-09 11:20:47+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2651728099
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2651728106
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2651728111
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2651728117
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259720599

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MarcoR (2024-11-11 06:45:40+00:00): Perché hai cambiato il nome di "Via Vittorio Emanuele" in "tangi"? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186203238
MarcoR (2024-11-24 22:32:28+00:00): ho risolto manualmente ripristinando il nome precedente
eggie (2024-11-09 19:33:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
mos_next_door (2024-11-25 12:12:30+00:00): Hi. You've deleted a road to mt. Hatis, probably using outdated sat imagery. Please be more careful. I've reverted this edit.

Добрый день. Вы удалили дорогу на Атис, которая, вероятно, ещё не видна на устаревших снимках. Пожалуйста, будьте аккуратнее и не удаляйте реально существующие объекты. Эта правка откачена.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159570594
ToniE (2024-11-09 11:55:53+00:00): Präziser: Tegernseer Landstraße, Wirthstraße, Weißenseestraße, Spixstraße, Raintaler Straße, Werner-Schlierf-Straße, Ella-Lingens-Platz, Untersberstraße
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-09 12:01:01+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12325741992

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀