piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Patrik_B (2025-08-14 11:18:09+00:00): Thank you for pointing it out Gregory. I was uploading multiple points that day and of course I checked the area around it, I guess I wasn't looking far enough in this case. Thank you I fixed it. The old point was from GNS (GEOnet Names Server) which is less acurate then the points we got from survey so I moved it to the location I uploaded.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169397600
Gregory Peony (2025-08-14 12:46:33+00:00): You're welcome! Thanks for fixing the issue, and the info regarding GNS and location accuracy.
Dawid2849 (2025-07-24 15:19:48+00:00): Thanks!
Frans S (2025-07-25 10:13:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not map clustered buildings.
Each building should be mapped as an individual building.
Best regards and keep mapping
NeisBot (2025-07-24 13:19:04+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
balint36 (2025-08-28 06:42:09+00:00): A Keleti felszíni meglévő csonka vágánya miért lett keresztülhúzva az OMV kúton?
balint36 (2025-08-28 06:47:55+00:00): Keleti Stadion csonka vágányát visszaraktam e helyére, az elbontott szakasz helyzetét kérlek, majd nézd meg, mert most így nem biztos, hogy jó.
Dave Venables (2025-07-24 13:54:48+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13020986760 Nightingale Fish Bar open? duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/700844717 that is marked as disused.
osmviborg (2025-07-24 13:59:55+00:00): Det er implicit at overfladen på en 	fairway er græs.
aupdk (2025-07-24 14:09:26+00:00): Mener du logisk? Eller er det defineret i OSM? Kan ikke finde noget dokumentation på det selv - men anyway, jeg har ikke stærke meninger om det, så jeg undlader bare at sætte den key fremadrettet.
osmviborg (2025-07-24 14:12:21+00:00): Fra wiki'en:  'A fairway is an area between the tee and green where the grass is cut even and short'.
aupdk (2025-07-24 14:22:07+00:00): Jeg ved ikke om den tekst, efter min mening, gør det implicit i en datateknisk kontekst, men jeg undlader gerne at medtage den surface-key fremadrettet, gør ikke nogen forskel for mig.
custodiankeyy (2025-07-25 21:54:56+00:00): Hello, I couldn't understand your description of the change set. Could you explain?
Leo Slager (2025-07-24 21:41:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2025-07-24 21:43:10+00:00): review:
Door een andere mapper is de Oerdijk reeds gewijzigd in highway=footway.
jack walker2 (2025-07-26 15:14:34+00:00): 您好 我更新了少许南戴河宁海道附近的几个商户（欧可超市，阿里美烤肉店，蜜雪冰城等） 您可以帮我补充完整并优化他们的位置吗
hahae (2025-07-27 11:59:52+00:00): 抱歉啊，我目前已经离开这个区域了。。英雄的任务交给您了！（加一条街的商户真的累死了）
custodiankeyy (2025-07-25 22:14:05+00:00): Hello Tung41,

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
rskedgell (2025-07-24 14:03:35+00:00): It might be worth adding live_music=yes as well, see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:live_music
NeisBot (2025-07-24 14:06:42+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

Your changeset was commented because it appears to follow a pattern that could be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related.

Could you kindly confirm if your map edits were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #URLs
Koss1234 (2025-07-24 14:20:27+00:00): Because I made it first time I add official information about changes. If it not neccesary you can delete link
NeisReview (2025-07-27 09:43:03+00:00): 👍 Thank you for your map updates.
0235 (2025-07-24 17:38:13+00:00): I really appreciate all of this data that you add to OSM, and the research required to acquire it must add up to quite a lot of time. Thank you!
Tatti Barletta (2025-07-25 07:05:29+00:00): Revert because it was most likely an error
mueschel (2025-07-28 10:39:10+00:00): Hi,
please check this lake, something went wrong with the name tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/99246340
vojtechzaboril (2025-07-28 17:29:48+00:00): Hi, thanks. I fixed it now.
ToniE (2025-07-24 14:19:57+00:00): Hi mallok,

wir hatten hier vor ein paar Wochen schon mit "access:conditional=no @(...)" getagged, da die Sperrung nur recht kurz ist.

Jetzt, am 24. Juli ist die Sperrung nur noch 17 Tage, also kürzer als ´die ursprünglichen 6 Wochen. 

Ich wir sollten hier wieder auf access:conditional statt access gehen.

Gruß
Toni
ToniE (2025-07-24 14:32:25+00:00): Z.B. wird OsmAnd am 1.08. Daten aus OSM ziehen (ein paar Tage später zum Download anbieten), danach erst wieder am 1.9. Für OsmAnd-Nutzer (Navi) wird die Straße also mit reinem 'access' bis Anfang September als nicht nutzbar angeboten.
mallok (2025-07-24 19:32:33+00:00): Ich habe allerdings gemerkt, dass :conditional nicht dazu geführt hat, dass das Routing die Durchfahrt verhindert hat. Deswegen heute die Änderung. (Nach Vorgabe aus dem Wiki)
ToniE (2025-07-25 07:57:03+00:00): *:conditional wirkt dann nicht, wenn das Navi das nicht versteht - Fehler im Navi, das Konzept gibt es schon lange genug. Welches Navi hast du verwendet?

*:conditional wirkt dann noch) nicht, wenn das Navi noch nicht die neuesten Daten von OSM kennt. Hier spielt das Update-Interval eine Rolle (auch beim Löschen der Baustelle).

*:conditional hat den Vorteil, dass schon beim Erfassen der Baustelle in OSM klar ist, wann die Beschränkung endet. Ein Update im Navi braucht's am Ende der Baustellenphase nicht.

> (Nach Vorgabe aus dem Wiki)

Auf welche Stelle im Wiki beziehst du dich? Eventuell sollte dort ein Update des Textes erfolgen.
mallok (2025-07-25 09:05:06+00:00): Ich habe das routing von openstreetmap.org benutzt.

Wiki seite finde ich nciht mehr :-(
mallok (2025-07-25 09:06:09+00:00): Ich habe es gerade nochmla getestet. routing geht fröhlich durch die Baustelle. Schrott >:-\
ToniE (2025-07-25 09:19:50+00:00): > Ich habe das routing von openstreetmap.org benutzt.

Dort gibt es OSRM, Valhalla und GraphHopper

> Ich habe es gerade nochmla getestet. routing geht fröhlich durch die Baustelle. 

Wie gesagt: das hängt davon ab, wie oft und wann die routing-Software sich Daten aus OSM zieht
ToniE (2025-07-25 09:21:10+00:00): GraphHopper machts richtig.
ToniE (2025-07-25 09:22:47+00:00): Und GraphHopper kann auch access:conditional

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=48.21905%2C11.68619%3B48.21062%2C11.6955#map=15/48.21074/11.67362
StefanHRT (2026-02-20 07:55:49+00:00): Hallo, Ich habe die Parkberechtigung im Bereich Mehrower Allee / Oberweißbacher Straße im CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178800346 wieder angepasst, da das von Dir hinterlegte seit Mai 2025 nicht mehr stimmte (siehe Mapillary).
VG Stefan 
P.S. Grüß mal Tobias und Alex
fmc_5 (2026-02-22 17:04:57+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis und die Mühe der Wiederherstellung des aktuellen Standes.
P.S. Deine Grüße richte ich aus.
Supaplex030 (2026-02-22 23:39:07+00:00): Hallo Stefan, danke für deine Grüße und Aktualisierung – und beste Grüße zurück :) Dank deiner neuen Bilder konnte ich hier gerade sogar noch spezifizieren, dass es sich um ein "echtes" Halteverbot handelt. Lg, Alex
StefanHRT (2026-02-23 03:16:29+00:00): Hallo Ihr 2, 
Meine Bilder waren zwar kurz nach Errichtung des Parkverbotes da (wohne ja nur 3 Minuten entfernt), aber im September gab es auch weitere neue Bilder durch Euch (Louisa) ;)
Danke fürs weitere anpassen.
LG Stefan
IvicaBanovac (2025-07-28 09:12:14+00:00): Removing tags #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169600565
Leo Slager (2025-07-24 21:45:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Kugelbaum (2025-07-24 17:39:31+00:00): Hi,
So I'm getting this right, you've added these paths/tracks purely from lidar without surveying? This is unfortunately a recipe for disaster in Luxembourg.
To me, all the available data indicates that both your new ways are overgrown. 
Mind that this is a very busy area, if there is a way, the heatmap is pretty reliable.
Syl (2025-07-24 18:46:01+00:00): Bonjour, le nom est en partie en majuscules alors qu'il était bon précédemment et la fin est coupée (un des deux aurait plutôt sa place en nom alternatif), le type de commerce modifié n'est pas bon et vous avez mis le numéro de téléphone en double.
Merci de corriger.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-07-25 06:56:59+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour votre alerte.
Des corrections ont été effectuées

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-08-01 09:47:43+00:00): Bonjour Syl,

Nous nous sommes aperçus que notre client nous envoyait toujours des informations inexactes . Nous l'avons donc prévenu de corriger le plus rapidement leurs données.
Désolé pour le désagrément que cela engendre

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-24 15:13:03+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6325794708
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1293206634

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Grzebag (2025-07-25 06:54:35+00:00): Poprawione.
k1100lt (2025-07-24 17:39:59+00:00): No idea what UrbisAdm is, but I got the information from my brother who is living there! Made one mistake; the south-most 27A should be 27B.
bxl-forever (2025-07-24 18:51:54+00:00): Hello,

UrbIS is the authoritative reference for adresses within the Brussels-Capital Region.  (UrbisAdm is one of the viewers.)  Addresses in OSM are imported from UrbIS.

The edit was flagged as potentially suspicious because you are a new account and you moved a lot of addresses, and even erased some.  Moving an official address to another building or deleting an address should normally never happen.  When new users do that, it is often a mistake.

On the other hand, errors in UrbIS can occasionally happen.  If people can properly document them, it is okay to change the map—and we also warn the municipalities, so that the UrbIS database can be updated accordingly.  I key principle of OSM verifiability by third parties.

Can you provide some documentation confirming the change, maybe a few photos showing the building and numbers printed on the doors (in a way that we can match one picture with the others).  That could serve as evidence if there is something to change here.

Thanks.
Filip009 (2025-07-28 06:49:22+00:00): Zdravím, čo je to za challenge na maproulette? Do názvu patrí názov danej trasy, nie odkiaľ a kam vedie. Preto je toto v popise danej trasy.
sk1me (2025-07-28 06:56:04+00:00): Hey @Filip009, there's a challenge on maproulette (link below) where you have to add name tag to route relations and this one was without the tag. Do you know maybe a proper name for it? https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/2743
Filip009 (2025-07-28 07:04:38+00:00): Tank you for challenge link.

In Slovakia it is common, that we do not add names to hiking or cycling relations, if they do not have any. We do not even put from and where they are going into name tag.

We have ahd discussion about it. https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/f-9QR5_YKgY
sk1me (2025-07-28 07:09:32+00:00): Ok, good to know. I will go then according to this rule now. Thank you for keeping an eye and making OSM better!
user_5359 (2025-07-25 11:26:18+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/15787714. What is the mean of the key ref:DE-XX = DN-014? Did you mean ref:DE-NW = DN-014?
surveyor54 (2025-07-25 17:46:21+00:00): Oh yes, you're right, that was my mistake.
I'll correct it.

Thanks for the info.
J T E (2025-07-24 17:00:27+00:00): Thanks!
olo81 (2026-06-12 16:47:42+00:00): nazwa opisowa do poprawy
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
mat (2025-07-25 04:51:23+00:00): Bonjour, est-ce que la partie sud de la rue, jusqu'à la rue Gambetta, est aussi en double sens ?
Nassimfjqkwkxk937371 (2025-07-25 08:25:51+00:00): Bonjour,
Sur google my map c’est le cas visiblement. Comme on peut le voir sur le plan, il n’y a aucune autre intersection avant la rue Gambetta (au sud).

Je précise tour de même que je ne me suis pas rendu sur place. Trop loin.  

Une vérification sur site serait la bienvenue.

Bien à vous
Sylabowy Kot (2025-08-13 11:44:22+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tej nazwy zawierającej w sobie imiennika ulicy obok? Byłeś na miejscu i w regulaminie tak określili? Wszystko już jest w tagach: amenity=traffic_park
leisure=playground
A projekt w BO nazywał się po prostu "Miasteczko ruchu drogowego". Inne miasteczka np.: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/432213928
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442151491
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/907339669
nie zawierają w sobie imiennika.

Totalny przypadek, że znowu wypowiadam się pod twoją zmianą, ale masz przykład, czemu powinno się podawać źródło danych.
StC (2025-07-25 16:49:06+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là, en allongeant un chemin au-delà de son raccordement avec un autre chemin de l'itinéraire. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
eggie (2026-03-30 11:48:35+00:00): Hoi,

Ik haal foot=use_sidepath voorlopig weg van de dorpsweg. Daar loopt een wandelroute die anders geblokkeerd is.
Dan zullen eerst de wandelroutes moeten worden omgelegd. Dat kan overigens niet met Go Map.
MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2025-07-25 08:08:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why did you delete the fuel station?
Outline Creations (2025-07-25 11:35:17+00:00): During internal review this was updated from gas station type to building type. Please proceed to updating to gas station.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-24 16:43:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13021218485
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13021218486

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2025-07-24 17:16:51+00:00): Hi Ollolanda, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Modified node geometry."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #NoComment #AIgenerated
Taya_S (2025-07-25 04:44:11+00:00): Reverted questionable edit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169431263
hoserab (2025-07-24 16:50:02+00:00): Oops, my bad; that was definitely a copy-paste error on my part. Thanks for fixing it!
felipeeugenio (2025-07-24 20:58:05+00:00): Hola. Voy a corregir esto. Los caminos no se llaman así, en el nombre se está describiendo el número de la parcela y el loteo. La información está ok, pero no debe ir en el nombre del camino.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169410337
StC (2025-07-25 13:28:04+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire de rando qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
BHiko (2025-07-26 06:07:32+00:00): This cycleway is under construction. It is not complete at the Celestijnenlaan side. I would call it dangerous to use it.
Leo Slager (2025-07-24 21:47:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Marcel Nederland (2025-07-25 08:02:51+00:00): Dank je wel! Gelezen 😀
marczoutendijk_repair (2025-08-04 18:50:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169971828, 169971827 where the changeset comment is: ¨DWG
b-jazz (2025-07-25 04:58:18+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1417009167

When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. Take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Golf.png for an example of the "Wrong" way to map a fairway and a green. There are some cases where a fringe exists around a green and you should draw the fairway outline completely around a green. Other times, the fairway and green butt up against each other. In that case the fairway and green should share the same nodes at the boundary between the two. When drawing these shared nodes, editors like iD will "snap" to an existing node if you get close enough. If you could go back and clean up where you've made this mistake, that would be great. But more importantly, if you could stop from doing this in the future, it would be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out. Thanks.
NeisBot (2025-07-24 17:26:52+00:00): Hi Paradise Lost, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added surveillance cameras with ALPR capability to existing nodes."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
Nadja15 (2025-07-24 17:32:12+00:00): Jag tror faktiskt "house" var rätt taggat redan: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=terrace
archie (2025-07-24 19:06:22+00:00): Ja, du har faktiskt helt rätt i detta!
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-25 05:17:03+00:00): Привет. Вы добавили парку название «Рыбацкие места Грузия Поти». Это теперь видят все пользователи карты, не только вы. Я отменю вашу правку

Предполагаю, вы хотели сохранить это место для себя. В Оганик Мапс есть функция «избранное» для сохранения меток.
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-25 05:17:39+00:00): Правка отменена

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169431988
Filip009 (2025-07-28 06:21:53+00:00): Zdravím, nakreslil ste budovu cez budovu. Stačilo tej existujúcej pridať názov. Opravil som to :)
MilMapper (2025-07-28 06:37:29+00:00): Zdravim. Dakujem. FYI: Snazil som sa nakreslit obrysy original NarDom. Ostatne casti su novodobe pristavby a architektonicky nesedia...

MM
Filip009 (2025-07-28 06:43:12+00:00): Na to my sa ešte dalo použiť https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part
impiaaa (2025-07-24 18:16:34+00:00): OSM tags are case-sensitive: "access=Yes" is different from "access=yes". "Yes" with a capital Y won't work in most software.
impiaaa (2025-07-24 18:17:51+00:00): Also, the roads still have "access=private" on them, so software will assume that the roads aren't passable, even though the gates are.
Udarian (2025-07-24 18:23:46+00:00): kerb vertexes should not be placed on sidewalk centerlines
VLD317 (2025-07-24 19:28:39+00:00): Thank you for the response on my recent changeset. I reviewed my edits and made adjustments to the curbs where necessary. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.
ika-chan! (2025-07-24 18:11:32+00:00): Source has a typo: it was supposed to be "Ministerial Decision Γ25871/1963 (ΦΕΚ Β 319/23.07.1963);Register of National Roads (1998)".
impiaaa (2025-07-24 18:15:34+00:00): Be careful when changing raw tags! Removing the "highway" key makes it unusable by any software.
user_5359 (2025-07-25 08:20:53+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/28u3 . What is the mean of the key FULL_CIVIC ?
Kovoschiz (2025-07-25 04:22:06+00:00): Perhaps as mentioned before, `bus` would include at least non-franchised bus in HK. That's why `oneway:bus:conditional=` is used, which could still be `=no @ (private) in more standard terms.
Udarian (2025-07-24 18:26:21+00:00): kerb vertexes should not be placed on sidewalk centerlines
VLD317 (2025-07-24 19:28:52+00:00): Thank you for the response on my recent changeset. I reviewed my edits and made adjustments to the curbs where necessary. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.
CAM-Gerlach (2025-07-25 09:51:42+00:00): Hey—thanks for adding this! I did notice a few issues, which I fixed where possible in changeset #169441727 along with some further improvements and other nearby fixes.

FYI, the specific things I noticed included:
- The link way between the south terminus of Beamer Way and the Huckleberry trail was removed (and without replacement with a noexit node) which breaks correct routing, despite there being an apparent physical path connecting the two. I added it back, this time properly modeling the path between them.
- The sidewalk crossed two service ways without an intersection node between them (or more properly, a crossing node/way), which I added.
- The sidewalk tags on the corresponding road needed to be updated to match your changes and not contradict them, which I did.
- The sidewalk lacked footway links at either end connecting it to the physically-accessible road junctions, which is important for proper routing. I added them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169415756
CAM-Gerlach (2025-07-25 09:52:11+00:00): Also, in the same changeset ( https://osmcha.org/changesets/169441727 ) as a further improvement I added surface and foot/bicycle access tags to the sidewalk per local convention, as well as complete crossing tagging in line with standard practice.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169415756
CAM-Gerlach (2025-07-25 09:53:50+00:00): One thing I needed more info from you on: the new crossing added here was tagged `crossing=uncontrolled` and `crossing:markings=yes`, but the type of markings (most likely `zebra`, as used near-universally elsewhere at VT) was left unspecified, and no markings are visible on any available source of aerial or ground imagery (usable with OSM or otherwise). Could you confirm that zebra markings are present here? Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169415756