piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:00:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:56:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:56:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:54:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:58:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:00:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:58:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-16 07:11:25+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184167192

https://osm.org/changeset/184167192
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:53:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:02:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:55:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:59:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
Hufkratzer (2025-05-08 20:13:19+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1384754670 is NOT a horse riding centre (equestrian centre), it is a horse riding arena (carriere) similar to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1211761091
Polarbear (2025-05-09 07:59:01+00:00): Hi Tuiui,
addr:floor ist hierzulande kein Bestandteil der postalischen Adresse, ich habe das wieder entfernt, zusammen mit dem Altfehler der Hausnummer.

Das Abtippen der halben Speisekarte als cuisine=german;salad;burger;steak_house;juice;grill;dessert;fries halte ich persönlich nicht für sinnvoll, bin aber offen für eine Diskussion dazu.
eggie (2025-05-08 18:37:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
user_5359 (2025-05-11 09:57:31+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1384759164? What is the mean of the tag „cables“=„torsadé“? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Acables cables value is a number
HugoC01 (2025-05-13 17:44:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Power_networks/France/Aerien#Les_diff%C3%A9rents_types_de_lignes
user_5359 (2025-05-13 17:54:57+00:00): My recollection is that British English words (preferably lower case) are favoured for the keys and values. Apart from the fact that the drawings are missing in the key section, it is also awkward to use similarly spelt words for different meanings.
InfosReseaux (2025-06-20 16:19:32+00:00): Hello
This part of the document is outdated and cable=torsade shouldn't be used. I will fix the wiki, thank you for mentioning.
cables=* can't be set on French low voltage insulated cables as we barely see if there 4 or 5 cables (depending on public street lighting included or not).

Best regards
SETHV1 (2025-05-27 18:34:36+00:00): I have working knowledge of the area and you can see it in aerial photos.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-26 08:04:22+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173782616
MarinoBM (2025-05-08 19:06:49+00:00): Hola kaxtillo, gracias por contibuir a mejorar los datos de OpenStreetMap.
Como bien debes saber, la etiqueta name está destinada a los nombres propios, no a los nombres comunes o como nombres descriptivos.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Nombre_es_solo_el_nombre
He corregido las dos últimas ediciones.
Un saludo.
0235 (2025-05-15 12:37:33+00:00): More bus routes, Thank you ❤❤
gurglypipe (2025-05-08 20:59:52+00:00): Perhaps location:transition=yes? Presumably it’s a pole mounted transformer with both primary and secondary cables underground?
Dezza (2025-05-09 07:27:16+00:00): Thanks for updating the tagging!
Mah (2025-05-12 15:58:55+00:00): Lieber geowas,

bitte den neuen Rad- und Fußweg unter der Schiersteiner Brücke nicht wieder falsch eintragen. Der knickt wirklich erst östlich der Brücke ab, selbst begutachtet.

Grüße
Mah
qtck (2025-05-15 06:50:58+00:00): Hi Mah,

ich bin gestern noch mal den Weg entlang gefahren (Schierstein --> Biebrich). Eine erste leichte Verschwenkung ist  schon unter der ersten Brücke. dann ab dem Brückenzuweg die zweite größere. 

Aber da müssen wir uns nicht in die Haare kriegen ;-) zukünftige Satellitenbilder werden die Details irgendwann abbilden.

Viele Grüße
geowas
Mah (2025-05-16 16:37:55+00:00): Danke erstmal für die ausfühliche Antwort. Der erste Knick im Weg ist mir auch aufgefallen, deswegen hab ich auch Fotos der Stelle gemacht und damit den Weg mit einem leichten Knick gezeichnet. Die Verschwenkung befindet sich schon "vor" der Brücke ungefähr zwischen dem Ende der Knochenmühle und dem Trampelpfad zum Hafenweg. Sobald da passable Luftbilder verfügbar verfügbar sind kann man da nacharbeiten.

Grüße
Mah
Frank Peng (2026-01-18 08:05:33+00:00): Why did you delete a valid track road and cycleway in this changeset? What is the source for those deletions? I can clearly see the track road and cycleway in 2024 Bing imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165998096
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:53:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-13 15:04:14+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12820922880/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this edit
What kind of shop is here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting?
geologist877 (2025-06-18 15:49:36+00:00): It's a tobacco shop/smoking equipment shop. Unsure about the amenity, so that hasn't been changed. Changeset here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167788591
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-19 10:02:00+00:00): if value for shop was set, then amenity=fixme may be removed

I will do it
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:54:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:00:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
joel56dt (2025-05-09 17:51:55+00:00): Hi Blue Chip,
Are these post_office=post_partner locations Canada Post locations? It's unclear to me what post network they are associated with or how they are different from amenity=post_office in Canada.

It might be helpful if you could offer your thoughts into the ongoing forum thread about Canada Post office operators since these seems like an alternative tagging scheme: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/canada-post-outlets-not-operated-by-canada-post/129748

Thanks,
joel56dt
Blue Clip (2025-05-11 12:27:39+00:00): https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/8294734202

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:post_office%3Dpost_partner
trigpoint (2025-05-11 14:12:22+00:00): https://www.canadapost-postescanada.ca/cpc/en/support/kb/company-policies/terms-conditions/legal-terms-of-use-and-conditions says effectively that the site is for personal use so therefore does not include adding to OSM which is licensed to be used for any purpose.
joel56dt (2025-05-12 15:13:11+00:00): Hi Blue Clip, I would really appreciate if you can join the discussion on the forum. My least favourite part of OSM is when users work against each other in their mapping efforts and I am concerned this could be happening here because of a disagreement/misunderstanding in how these post offices should be mapped.

Separately, can you comment on your data source? If you are using the Canada Post website, as trigpoint linked, this could mean your contributions need to be deleted. OpenStreetMap is quite strict about data sources to avoid issues with its open data licence.

Thanks,
joel56dt
Blue Clip (2025-05-14 08:57:42+00:00): LGW delete?
Blue Clip (2025-05-14 09:11:16+00:00): https://www.google.com/maps/place/Canada+Post/@49.2746979,-123.1309996,20z/data=!4m8!3m7!1s0x548673ff2a40b765:0x681a11a1dd0fa9aa!8m2!3d49.27467!4d-123.1310755!9m1!1b1!16s%2Fg%2F11kphlpz9c?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDUxMS4wIKXMDSoJLDEwMjExNDU1SAFQAw%3D%3D

Negative full.
Blue Clip (2025-05-14 09:12:35+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canada_Post

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lcOL5ISS9aML6oaUOcgyngw4bio_gRmbxzLn-4GCjXQ/edit?gid=0#gid=0
trigpoint (2025-05-14 09:18:02+00:00): Google Maps, as you have linked above is absolutely not allowed as a source in OSM.
These edits will need to be reverted.
Blue Clip (2025-05-14 11:42:55+00:00): Google Maps not used source. Now to show not full.
Blue Clip (2025-05-14 11:45:10+00:00): Report bully trigpoint
trigpoint (2025-05-14 11:51:13+00:00): Merely asking the source of these edits.
Blue Clip (2025-05-14 12:39:46+00:00): No.Aggressive. Accuse.
Blue Clip (2025-05-14 12:42:05+00:00): No question

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165999133#c1436046
Blue Clip (2025-05-14 12:42:15+00:00): Please revert all my changes, you no longer have consent to use my edits.
woodpeck (2025-05-14 13:13:09+00:00): Hello Blue Clip, a decision on whether or not to revert your changes is going to be based on license compatibility, not on your consent or your withdrawing thereof. If English is not your native language, feel free to explain yourself in a language you feel more comfortable with.
Blue Clip (2025-05-14 13:29:38+00:00): LWG https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licensing_Working_Group/Minutes/2023-08-14#Ticket#2023081110000064_%E2%80%94_First_party_websites_as_sources
user_5359 (2025-05-09 12:04:06+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node=12820914733, https://www.osm.org/node/12820914734. What is the difference between naptan:ModificationDateTime and (the standard key) naptan:ModificationDate ? 
I also wonder what information the tag naptan:Modification = new provides if the date is not also logged? Please only transfer the really relevant information from a data source.
mstrbrid (2025-05-09 12:58:33+00:00): Hi, could you point me to where the list of "standard keys" is maintained? I'm a little unfamiliar with the purpose of importing from the NaPTAN datasets, so I've just copied over what I guessed to be useful. 'ModificationDateTime' was the header in the Bristol NaPTAN data so I used that. Happy to change it if you can point me in the direction of some guidance (the wiki doesn't include this header)
On your second point, I have included the date, so I'm a little confused about what you're trying to say.
user_5359 (2025-05-09 15:46:49+00:00): Hello! Did you know taginfo.osm.org? With https://taginfo.osm.org/search?q=naptan you will find all keys used that contain naptan. You can expand the search string: https://taginfo.osm.org/search?q=naptan:m you find
naptan:ModificationDate (696 objects)
naptan:ModificationDateTime (2 objects)
naptan:Modification (2 objects)
mstrbrid (2025-05-09 17:23:23+00:00): Yes, very familiar with taginfo. The other objects were all created by a single user, spiregrain, using a different dataset, supplied by a different local authority. There are inconsistencies between the way that local authorities provide NaPTAN data. Some off these have been addressed by the UK community, but I can't see any guidance for the "~:Modification~" tags. I'll wait until I hear something from the UK public transport mapping community for some guidance before making any further changes.
pan_borsuk (2025-05-09 12:46:34+00:00): trup jeszcze ciepły 🔥 a tu już "bud.owa" 😁
SekeRob (2025-05-09 06:00:11+00:00): Hi,

I've reverted your edit. What's on a brdige is all layer=1 + bridge=viaduct and what passes below does then not need a layer=-1. IF it is at layer=-1 then you need to tell why, but you removed the tunnel tag. Notable, since you did a survey, many rail underpasses in Pescara are signed 'ponte basso' because the maxheight is below the legal 4.8m requiring a sign. Since the height is not signed here added maxheight:signed=no, so route planners know that the height is at least a minimum of 4.8m

happy mapping.
baprischka (2025-05-09 06:30:39+00:00): Hi, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4739742#map=15/42.45084/14.21759 for the context of this change. I kept the existing layer=-1 as it was simpler than cutting all the railroads to add layer=1 on them; in the end using -1 and 0 has the same effect has using 0 and 1.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-08 19:31:08+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/678244761

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-05-08 19:42:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Ik stuur je edits wel even door naar een van de OV experts.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2025-05-08 23:03:53+00:00): Thanks for the comment.
I removed the bus_stops.
Actuely the busstop is on the Pontplein, south of the roundabout.
Changed also the routerelations of bus 456.
someovuser (2025-05-09 05:12:33+00:00): Thanks, it seems bimba now routes through the bus stop on pontplein. I have to be in Assendelft again tomorrow so I'll go ahead and see if i can find that bus stop on pontplein, since i may not have seen it due to being in a bit of a hurry.
someovuser (2025-05-11 12:04:48+00:00): your correct its on pontplein.
i followed the same route as i did last time and can confirm that it is now mapped correctly.
it probably got changed recently, since the stop on pontplein was clearly built recently.
cronoser (2026-03-13 16:33:44+00:00): hola, echa un vistazo a learnosm.org/es para que ayude a aprender a mapear
eggie (2025-05-08 20:05:07+00:00): Dag someovuse...   De taluds langs het water maken geen onderdeel uit van het water zelf.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-08 20:13:45+00:00): Ik heb de taluds weer aangepast. 
gr eggie
eggie (2025-05-08 20:19:03+00:00): CTRL-F5 for quick rendering.
The banks are not part of the waterbody.. So I changed the banks back into landuse instead of water.
eggie
someovuser (2025-05-09 05:32:23+00:00): Ok ik ga zo even achter de computer zitten om te kijken hoe ik het volgende keer wat netter kan doen.
(Ik zat gisteren met mijn telefoon te worstelen om door die tutorial heen te komen maar de website is best duidelijk niet bedoeld voor de telefoon.
Dus vandaar dat ik het zo slordig had gedaan, fijn dat jij het even had opgeruimd.
eggie (2025-05-09 05:40:29+00:00): Inderdaad.. een mobiel is inderdaad niet echt geschikt. ... Veel plezier met mappen.
eggie
richlv (2025-05-09 06:34:14+00:00): Sveiki un liels paldies par kartes papildināšanu.
Šķiet, te ceļi ap dzelzceļu tika dzēsti. Iespējams, nedaudz labāk būtu bijis tos atstāt, bet nomainīt uz highway=construction - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction .

Aicinām arī pievienoties Latvijas OSM kopienas čatam https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com :)
HellMap (2025-05-09 09:56:42+00:00): Sveiki, es izmaiņas atcēlu un iezīmēju pa jaunu, jo tajās bija vairākas problēmas, viena no tām augstāk minētā. Dzēst ceļu noteikti nevar, jo uz tiem ir daudz maršrutu, kuri būs salauzti.

Tā saprotu, ka izmaiņas ir par https://sigulda.lv/atsakusies-parbuves-darbi-sigulda-no-6-maija-slegta-dzelzcela-parbrauktuve-rigas-iela/
PasaulesGlabejs (2025-05-09 11:06:57+00:00): Sveiki,
Pareizi, dzelzceļa pārbrauktuve ir ciet.
To vajadzētu ielikt
PasaulesGlabejs (2025-05-09 11:35:31+00:00): Skatos, ka tagad viss ir salikts pareizi. Liels paldies! 
Vienkārši šis ir ļoti aktuāli ēdienu kurjeriem. Platforma apgalvo, ka ceļu satiksmes izmaiņas kartē saņem no šīs vietnes. 
Kā arī samaksa tiek aprēķināta tā, itkā tiktu braukts pāri dzelzceļa pārbrauktuvei. 
Takā liels paldies!
richlv (2025-05-09 13:04:20+00:00): Burvīgi, liels paldies - un noteikti aicinām kartē zīmēt arī visu ko citu :)
stasiu512 (2025-05-08 20:30:36+00:00): Dzięki! Przeoczyłem i za dużo tagów dodałem ;)
Marek-M (2025-05-08 21:01:39+00:00): Spokojnie, to był mój błąd dokonany 4 lata temu :)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96823247
DawsZed (2025-05-09 00:40:14+00:00): Hey noname1313, just noticed a lamp post decided to take a 0.5 mile trip to the west here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12366069295/history/2), so I've escorted it back home. Just a heads up that iD can sometimes move objects when you're clicking and dragging around. Thanks for all your work otherwise, take care.
noname1313 (2025-05-09 20:21:41+00:00): my bad thanks for fixing it.
Roydon Olive (2025-05-17 09:57:12+00:00): This change actually changed some service roads that form a bus loop on private property into primary roads, which is far different from what the summary says. In addition, these roads are not primary roads. They are a bus loop on private property, so service road is a better label. I will revert this.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-08 20:21:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Generała Stanisława Maczka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/50375926
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/50375932
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446513966

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
HellMap (2025-05-09 10:02:12+00:00): Lūdzu adreses punktus nedzēst. Tie ir automātiski importēti no VZD adrešu/kadastrālās informācijas.
richlv (2025-05-09 15:13:22+00:00): Tam punktam šķietami nebija parkinga apzīmējumu - kāpēc šķita, ka to vajag dzēst?
Roydon Olive (2025-05-17 10:01:07+00:00): this changeset is also wrong and the description is also not about what the change actually did
mf8s003j (2025-05-28 16:11:14+00:00): Your change created so much extra work fixing all the bus routes in and out of Kildonan Place.
Roydon Olive (2025-05-29 03:09:26+00:00): Sorry that you have to clean up the mess this user caused. I reported them after I left the above comment and they have been banned. I tried to undo their damage but I wasn't fully successful. They have other changes that messed up other bus related things: another change messed with a bus loop off Raleigh. They have a short edit history and I think I commented on all their changesets that are vandalism so it should be easy to find them.
mf8s003j (2025-05-29 14:00:22+00:00): @Roydon Olive I realized as I was going to bed last night that I didn't direct my frustration correctly towards the vandal. Thank you for fixing up their vandalism!
Roydon Olive (2025-05-29 21:10:01+00:00): No worries, I understood where you were going. Thanks for your work in fixing things up as well!
Lezurex (2025-05-09 06:04:49+00:00): When mapping sidewalks separately, it should be sidewalk:*=separate, not yes.
yelisey90 (2025-05-09 09:33:06+00:00): It's 2.5 GEL for citizens of Georgia, and 12 GEL for foreign citizens. But I don't know how to tag that...
uselesskitten (2025-05-09 10:17:14+00:00): It's not, you can pay either Metromoney or contactless. They don't check your citizenship. 
I'm not sure how much does it cost if you pay contactless with a foreign card, though: other public transport does charge foreign cards 1.5 GEL instead of 1. 
But again, you can buy Metromoney, no ID or bank card needed. The card costs 2 GEL.
HellMap (2025-05-09 10:03:00+00:00): Vai varētu precizēt, kas tieši šeit ir mainījies? Ja ceļš ir norakts un pārstādīta zāle, tad ceļš te vairs nevarētu būt. Vai arī, ja joprojām ir ceļš, tad zāle to nevarētu pilnībā pārklāt.
richlv (2025-05-09 15:14:15+00:00): Varētu arī būt pirmais zīmēšanas tuvinājums, iezīmējot vienu laukumu - tas gan tikai minējums.
HellMap (2025-05-09 15:24:02+00:00): Es balstījos uz "Not public parking" komentāru no citas izmaiņas. Ļoti reti tādi izbraukāti laukumi pagalmos pārtop atpakaļ par apzaļumojumiem bez kārtīgas norobežošanas. Parasti, ja tur joprojām ir ceļš, tad viss atkal būs izbraukāts pēc mēneša. Tāpēc arī gribēju precizēt, vai šeit tiešām ir ceļš joprojām un ir šādi pārtapis.
habib_amir (2025-05-09 18:48:07+00:00): Убедительная просьба в следующий раз такое огромное количество  правок не вносить! Сейчас все 700 с лишним изменений придётся перепроверять.
Jakub Sýček (2025-05-13 07:51:58+00:00): I incorrectly used the operator:ref tag instead of operator:ref:ico (or whatever else is correct) for the IČO business identification number. Can someone bulk-correct this? This pertains to changesets 165885613, 165924452, 165967748, 165968667, 166002011.
Frans S (2025-05-10 13:26:52+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping.
E: Buildings not squared.
G: Included the shadow of the building.
H: Included a yard of clearing.
High building(s) incorrect mapped. See par 20 chapter About Buildings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166002105
Frans S (2025-05-10 13:56:57+00:00): Additional info on this task
Many tall buildings have a small building, a superstructure, lift building or something similar on the roof, do not map it as a separate building, just map the roof lines of the complete building, and move the whole to the footprint. You can often see it in the shadow.

Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166002105
Frans S (2025-05-10 13:58:34+00:00): I forgot to mention the issues.
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping.
E: Buildings not squared.
G: Included the shadow of the building.
H: Included a yard of clearing.
High building(s) incorrect mapped. See par 20 chapter About Buildings
document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166002105
muralito (2025-05-09 01:21:09+00:00): Hi. Thanks.
This kind of things are not visible in Esri World Imagery. ¿What source did you use?