piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Langlaeufer (2024-06-13 09:49:38+00:00): Hallo,
danke das du helfen möchtest OSM zu verbessen. Leider waren diese Änderungen keine Verbesserung den der Radweg und die Access-Werte auf der Straße waren zuvor vollkommen korrekt eingetragen. siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren
Bitte auch keine Namen erfinden. siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name

Grüße
Frank Thiemann
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152592451
Langlaeufer (2024-06-13 09:31:31+00:00): Hallo 
Der Weg war doch schon eingezeichnet? Warum nochmal obendrüber?
Grüße
Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152592771
MxxCon (2024-06-18 02:01:18+00:00): In this edit you also deleted highway=crossing tag. How come?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152592808
VLD277 (2024-06-18 21:34:34+00:00): Hello MxxCon, 
Thank you for reaching out. I found a lowered curb here that I hadn’t noticed on my initial edit, so I have changed this crossing back to unmarked. For reference, the highway=crossing tag was initially removed based on the OSM wiki recommendation for informal crossings.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing=informal?uselang=en
eggie (2024-06-12 16:50:26+00:00): Beste Nivkys,

Je trek voortdurend wegen over wegen heen zonder verbindingen. Dat routeert echt niet.

warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway
  	2


  warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway
  	5
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=152592984

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-06-12 16:55:23+00:00): Gerepareerd. De bieb heb ik ook verwijderd. Die was al getagd op een node.
MVG
eggie
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-13 05:45:51+00:00): (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/152609228
ftrebien (2025-03-10 15:58:46+00:00): Esta via não é arterial no plano diretor, logo sua velocidade padrão é menor que 60 km/h. No local só tem uma placa de 60 km/h um pouco antes da rua Darcy Pereira Pozzi. Todo o restante da via tem placas de 40 km/h.
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-13 05:45:04+00:00): (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/152609228
NeisBot (2024-06-12 16:00:26+00:00): Hi Matys1313, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/326188338

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-13 05:52:05+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/152609228
VLD278 (2024-06-18 21:14:46+00:00): Hello!
I’m reaching out in regards to n1544555924. It looks like you changed the business from Oberbilker Grill to Hood Company. Online it appears that Oberbilker Grill is still open and operating at this location. I just wanted to check in and see if the business had closed down or changed locations?
lyctkel (2024-06-19 06:28:31+00:00): Hi VLD278 ,
you are right. The tag was not well positioned. Thus I accidentally changed the Oberbilker Grill.
I have reverted it. 
Greetings from the Netherlands to Colorado!
Regards
lyctkel
VLD278 (2024-06-20 15:55:22+00:00): Thanks for making that fix, have a great day!
Regards,
VLD278
NeisBot (2024-06-12 16:03:26+00:00): Hi Matys1313, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1291810640

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-13 05:52:19+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/152609228
NeisBot (2024-06-12 16:06:25+00:00): Hi Matys1313, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1291811055

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-13 05:52:32+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/152609228
eggie (2024-06-12 17:23:33+00:00): Dag B E   Svp geen gebouwen op gebouwen mappen. Gebruik dan een adresnode.
Ik zet de info even over op een node. 
MVG
eggie
Beveiliging-Europoort (2024-06-12 18:39:33+00:00): thanks, zal ik het vervolg niet meer doen.
eggie (2024-06-12 18:42:30+00:00): 👍
NeisBot (2024-06-12 16:06:25+00:00): Hi Matys1313, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1291811270

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-13 05:52:42+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/152609228
BladeTC (2024-06-21 23:07:33+00:00): Hey Matt, I reviewed it, you can always fix the current data instead of deleting and mapping it again.
I will review it as Good, and thanks for helping us out.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152594707
akimapbuilder (2024-06-13 06:23:25+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since there is no building in sight.
NeisBot (2024-06-12 16:12:25+00:00): Hi Matys1313, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1291812606

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-13 05:52:51+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/152609228
NeisBot (2024-06-12 16:18:25+00:00): Hi Matys1313, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1291813372

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-13 05:53:03+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/152609228
literan (2024-06-12 17:28:10+00:00): кривой формат адрески. Нужно ставить пробел перед буквами "вл", "к" и "с", обозначающими владение, строение и корпус

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
NeisBot (2024-06-12 16:24:25+00:00): Hi Matys1313, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1291814480

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-13 05:53:13+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/152609228
NeisBot (2024-06-12 16:33:25+00:00): Hi Matys1313, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1291817301

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-13 05:53:22+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/152609228
NeisBot (2024-06-12 16:36:25+00:00): Hi Matys1313, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1291818212

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-13 05:53:31+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/152609228
NeisBot (2024-06-12 16:36:25+00:00): Hi Matys1313, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/way/1291818564
https://osm.org/way/1291818212
https://osm.org/relation/6721308

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-13 05:53:44+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/152609228
emersonveenstra (2024-06-12 17:36:39+00:00): Hi there,

I'm curious why you're adding empty nodes to roads? It's not technically wrong, but I don't see the reason behind it
akimapbuilder (2024-06-13 06:27:31+00:00): You draw building over backyard, try to avoid that. Thanks
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2024-06-13 23:54:31+00:00): These are not caravan sites.

I have changed it to bungalows.
user_21617732 (2024-06-14 05:23:45+00:00): Yes, it is. We have a camping there
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2024-06-14 14:42:01+00:00): Yes, I have seen the website.
And if you have a separate caravansite, then that should be tagged.

But you do not have 21 caravan sites, you have at most one. Just as you have only one camp site.
One caravan site can have multiple camp_pitches. I have tried to map that.
canfe (2024-06-13 05:19:43+00:00): Il nome di frazione non va dato alla strada ma segnato come un singolo nodo.
Raramente le strade che portano ad una frazione hanno un nome.
Controlla e correggi.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152596695
canfe (2024-06-13 05:21:45+00:00): Esiste una cartellonistica che indichi "via Villaggio Albaron"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152596695
canfe (2024-08-18 08:40:29+00:00): il loc_name=Campanin
si riferisce alla via o a una frazione vicino alla frazione Cornetti?
GiaMar (2024-10-08 12:18:21+00:00): Il loc_name si riferisce alla via. Era il nome del sentiero che aveva lo stesso percorso fino agli anni '20 del Novecento, quando è stata costruita la strada carrozzabile che ha conservato il nome del sentiero. Le fonti sono: testimonianze degli anziani abitanti di Balme e antiche cartoline dei primi anni del Novecento. Il nome del sentiero si ritrova inoltre nel primo catasto di Balme, redatto pochi anni dopo la creazione del comune autonomo (distaccatosi dal comune di Ala di Stura), il catasto è quello del 1622.
Michi (2024-06-12 20:43:33+00:00): Das Schulgebiet ist übrigens kein Gebäude. ;-)
Ich hab's eben korrigiert.
canfe (2024-06-13 05:23:12+00:00): Se non esistesse la via: creare frazione e mettere addr:place=Villaggio Albaron
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152597665
rskedgell (2024-07-24 10:59:31+00:00): No, it was mapping for the renderer. Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154344167
NieWnen (2025-12-14 17:32:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/976402140

Co oznacza `bicycle=yes` na tym przejściu? To przejście dla pieszych i przejazd dla rowerów (znak D-6b)?
neuhausr (2024-06-12 19:07:31+00:00): Hi, I divided Lyndale then did some edits for the crossing on the north side of the intersection if that's a helpful model. (Since there is a physical barrier, dividing the highway is preferred to turn restrictions) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152602089 Happy mapping! Brad
kucai (2024-06-13 03:43:54+00:00): yang ni takleh tag amenity school dah. mungkin taruk office=yes, name = bilik operasi ok. Amenity=school tu untuk keseluruhan kawasan, yang lain2 kat dalam xleh pakai tag yang sama.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152598497
NLSU (2024-06-13 13:14:35+00:00): Terima kasih kerana info!
pavvv (2024-06-12 18:15:07+00:00): zamiast zostawiać sam węzeł z access=unknown lepiej jest całkowicie usunąć go lub ewentualnie dać amenity=parking + access=private
os-emmer (2024-10-10 15:52:38+00:00): Hello Doug Shidell and thank you for your contribution. You added some nodes with "highway"="crossing:island=yes".
This does not look correct. What exactly are these nodes? Are they crossing islands or traffic calming islands?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:island
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:traffic_calming%3Disland
Doug Shidell (2024-10-10 20:50:05+00:00): The crossing at Lyndale and 41st serves two purposes. First, it prevents through traffic on 41st. All motorists must make a right turn onto Lyndale Ave, whether traveling east or west. Lyndale Ave is narrowed, so there is a traffic calming element.
The island also creates a pedestrian Island that allows pedestrians and bicyclists to cross one lane of traffic and wait in a safe spot before crossing the second lane.
os-emmer (2024-10-11 13:01:32+00:00): Thanks for the reply and the detailed explanaition! That sounds like a quite complex situation and I am not absolutly sure how I would map this.
Someone already changed the nodes to traffic_calming=island:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11976014275
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11976014276
That does not look richt as there are now 2 nodes for one traffic island. And this is against the good practice "One feature, one OSM element":
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

I am not sure how to fix this. I opened a note to make this topic more public:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4474129
Doug Shidell (2024-10-11 14:36:23+00:00): Thanks for the follow-up. I had trouble with this when I mapped it. There is a similar island four blocks south at 45th and Lyndale. Once we have a solution, we should apply it to that intersection as well.
gvwaal (2025-02-16 05:10:04+00:00): I updated this crossing to match this example. If that's fine with y'all, you or I can make a similar update at 45th & Lyndale.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:island#Alternatives
Doug Shidell (2025-02-17 01:54:33+00:00): That looks like the correct solution. I tried to duplicate the solution at 45th and Lyndale. If you don't mind, could you take a look and let me know if I missed anything? 

Thanks for doing the research and coming up with a solution.
gvwaal (2025-02-17 03:08:40+00:00): It's pretty close. Add an area for the median with the tag area:highway=traffic_island. If you wanted to match the wiki exactly, make the ways between the median's curb and the sidewalk's curb footway=crossing, but personally, I don't know how necessary that is since you've already got a node as a crossing; I see many more nodes as crossings than ways.
Doug Shidell (2025-02-17 16:39:00+00:00): Check it again when you get the time. I put in the traffic island and created crossings. Thanks
gvwaal (2025-02-19 18:13:18+00:00): Looks good!
eggie (2024-06-12 18:40:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Probeer het gebied van je edits wat kleiner te houden. Dus niet schuiven met de kaart.
Dat maakt het ook makkelijker om je edits te controleren. 
Verder zie ik hier 7 foutmeldingen?
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-railway
  	7
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-14 02:30:34+00:00): Reverted by DWG - undiscussed OEG Import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163594357
SUPER HEROS 67 (2024-06-20 17:22:58+00:00): Bonjour RomainC14,

Félicitations pour votre première contribution sur OpenStreetMap en France ! Merci de nous aider à améliorer la carte.

Cependant, je tiens à vous informez sur le fait que vous avez utilisez un tag qui ne correspond pas au tag normalement à utiliser.

Je m'explique vous aviez mis sur chaque bâtiment un tag qui donner l'information, qu'il y à un médecin à cette endroit là en donnant le nom "Bâtiment fait le 12 juin 2024". Vous aurez du mettre sur les bâtiments le tag source avec "Bâtiment fait le 12 juin 2024"

Je me suis donc permis de corrigé votre erreur.

Bonne journée et amusez-vous bien !

SUPER HEROS 67
woodpeck (2024-06-12 18:22:10+00:00): Dear Fedor Filimonov, thank you for adding data sources to your changesets as requested, and for documenting your efforts on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Hotels,_Motels,_Guest_houses. Sadly, neither "booking services" nor Google are a legal source for adding data to OpenStreetMap; the databases kept by Google and booking services are subject to database rights and/or copyright, and without explicit permission from these services we must not use that data.
Fedor Filimonov (2024-06-12 18:55:19+00:00): Dear woodpeck,
I added the project idea to the Wiki. It really does not use data that is protected by copyright or that, even indirectly, cannot be verified.
rowcherryrow (2024-06-12 18:39:50+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Bing Streetside.
literan (2024-06-13 19:19:50+00:00): кривой формат адрески. Надо ставить пробел перед буквами "к", "с", "вл"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
PcMouse1 (2024-06-18 04:46:22+00:00): Has Highway 11 been rerouted yet?
wordbird (2024-06-18 10:38:53+00:00): Yes, "The Highway 11 realignment (4.7 km) was opened to traffic in August 2023" 

https://www.greenstonegoldmines.com/project-development
richlv (2024-06-13 09:10:38+00:00): Liels paldies par kartes uzlabošanu.
Nosaukums palicis iepriekšējais citos posmos - vai būtu vēlme arī tos salabot?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/875285180
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/875285181

Vēl laikam būtu vērts vienādot ar šī posma kartējumu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226404833 .

Teorētiski tas nav pilnīgi oficiāls nosaukums, bet tā kā šo ceļu tā mēdz saukt, "name" taga lietošana šķiet pieņemama.
akimapbuilder (2024-06-13 06:30:13+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since there is no building in sight.
CurlingMan13 (2024-06-13 04:21:19+00:00): You haven't responded to previous changeset comments, and are continuing to make the same errors.  Specifically, you are continuing to "lollipop" or fold an area back on itself, but leave a little sliver to try and make a hole when you should use multipolygon relations.

It appears you received previous blocks for this, and yet, here we are.
nmac85 (2024-06-14 02:51:28+00:00): I am not sure what your obsession with me is but not doing these to harm you or anyone personally.

I see several users  using similar mapping and you are not changing them just only mine.

Send me a not vs change them so ic an see what you mean.
bxl-forever (2024-06-12 20:38:47+00:00): Hello,

I am writing to you again about the MapRoulette tasks you want to solve.  I left a changeset comment and a private message to please request that you do not continue with those edits in Brussels.

Your edit does not solve anything.  On the contrary, it makes the map completely wrong.  You even erased valid addresses from the map.  We do not appreciate that you continue doing destructive edits and keep ignoring messages sent to you.

We kindly request that you would ignore this faulty MapRoulette quest for Brussels, Belgium, because it triggers too many false positive errors.

Your reply under this comment would be highly appreciated.

Thanks in advance.
silversurfer83 (2024-06-12 19:48:52+00:00): Gude

warum taggst du tracks eigentlich häufig so https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291873006 und nicht mit "motor_vehicle=agricultural;forestry"?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152601729
Protoxenus (2024-06-12 20:34:15+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Semikola-getrennte_Werte
silversurfer83 (2024-06-12 20:49:31+00:00): Ah. Danke. Nachvollziehbar.

Jedoch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Verkehrszeichen_in_Deutschland (bitte bis Land+Forst frei scrollen. Ist weiter unten)
kojott (2024-11-05 10:00:06+00:00): Ten parking przy dworcu, który usunąłeś, dalej istnieje (1263067424), więc dobrze by było go przywrócić
oba510 (2024-06-15 07:52:26+00:00): Hi,
Please note that highway=corridor is an entirely appropriate tag to use on indoor corridors inside buildings. Please don't change it to highway=footway.  Also, you moved one of the terminal 2 entrances to line-up with the covered walkway, which would make sense, but that's not how it's actually built.  Some surface/covered tags were lost as well around the entrances.
Gangadi Anusha (2024-06-19 09:28:06+00:00): Thanks for your concerns, If we are assigning "Highway=Corridor" then routing won't be possible OSm.org map because of the "Corridor" attribute on a segment, which is not visible in osm.org map in Non-Edit mode.
ManuelB701 (2024-07-11 06:10:28+00:00): Hallo Sint,

hattest du wirklich neue Routen angelegt anstelle die existierende zu ändern?
Die Idee ist, dass PTNA sich beschwert, dass deine hinzugefügten nicht mit den Route-Mastern verbunden ist aber selbst wenn, sieht es so aus, als ob die einzelnen Linien in der Datenbank als Variationen erscheinen anstelle eines gegenwärtigen Zustands.
In allen Fällen würde ich deine hinzugefügten löschen und deren Verlauf auf die existierenden übertragen, um die Historie zu bewahren.

Grüße
Manuel
Sint E7 (2024-07-11 19:02:53+00:00): Hallo Manuel,

Ich habe gerade PTNA überprüft und einige Routen korrigiert, die falsch waren.