piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2023-02-28 17:02:53+00:00): Ahh,..  Ik zie n je reactie... dank daarvoor.
Nou .. we tekenen alleen fietspaden in als ze gescheiden zijn van de hoofdrijbaan. Het fietspad gaat over in een fietssuggestie strook. Die heb ik toegevoegd als cycleway:left=shared_lane (left heeft te naken met de richting van de weg) 
Het was hier allemaal goed getagd.
Alle begin is natuurlijk moeilijk.
De grens van de wijk had je hier vastgeplakt aan de de  Mauritsstraat, Daarom is je editgebied zo groot geworden. Geloof me Het is hier gewoon goed gemapt.
Aanvulling. Je kunt geen wegen opknippen met een simpele editor als iD. Dan gaan de routerelaties stuk. 
Dat kan alleen met editor JOSM..
Maar een fietspad hoef je dus niet in te tekenen, want dat is er niet...  Alleen wat rode verf op het wegdek.
:)
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
MxxCon (2023-03-01 02:28:19+00:00): Hello.
When mapping features with straight line edges, there's no need to add intermediate nodes beyond the 2 corners. That makes your mapping look neater and more accurate to the real world.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133136007
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-01 00:29:22+00:00): Please use more detailed changeset comments.  What did you change, and why?
Notme1969 (2023-03-02 14:29:29+00:00): Its a tiny private nine hole course in a senior living community. the tees and greens were outlined as well as the over all course path 1 through 9.  Why do you care?  There is hardly any need for further explanation. Its a golf course with only tees and greens. Pretty self-explanatory.
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-02 14:41:36+00:00): Because, this changeset covers a large geographic area.  But that isn't really the big issue.

Why do I care?  Because I am tired of having to clean up all the vandalism by golf mappers.  There has been a ton of golf vandalism to this volunteer open source project, which has resulted in a lot of edits and changesets being reverted.  Some even just putting things like "Golf Course" then tragically damaging major roadways like I-80.  Putting in a bit more detail like "Added holes at ####" or "Adjusted cartpaths at ####" is immensely popular.

You can read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Notme1969 (2023-03-04 17:23:28+00:00): I do not damage anything, ever. But I will continue to map golf courses for my own purposes as I see fit. Your opinion on the matter is completely irrelevant.  It is an open system and thus open for use that you may not agree with.  Find another hobby if this stresses you out.
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-04 17:46:11+00:00): It is an open source project that has rules that need to be followed.  Using good changeset comments is one of them, as well as only mapping things that exist, and mapping them correctly.

Continuing to not follow rules and guidelines will have consequences.
NieWnen (2023-04-27 13:53:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3660580
syntex (2025-07-03 23:24:17+00:00): Naprawione
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
MxxCon (2023-03-01 02:29:53+00:00): When mapping features that have right angles, after you draw them you can right click on them and select "Make Square".
Similarly with round features..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133136216
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
sydn3y (2023-02-28 16:33:06+00:00): Also updates COTA 61
Tomas_J (2026-01-27 10:58:08+00:00): resurvey - je tu skutocne vysliapany neformalny chodnik popri ceste? na ortofoto to tak nevyzera... https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150204899
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Xandaros (2023-03-02 15:18:56+00:00): Hallo Timonade! Das sieht mehr sehr nach einem Massenedit aus. Wurde dies irgendwo vorher abgesprochen?
Timonade (2023-03-02 16:21:13+00:00): Hallo Xandaros abgesprochen? tatsächlich habe ich nur eine MapRoulett Challenge gemacht in der ich viele veraltete Tags wie parking:lane erneuert habe.
Xandaros (2023-03-02 16:31:12+00:00): Ah, ok. Habe verstanden.

Es ging bei meiner Frage hauptsächlich darum, ob es hier ein mehr oder weniger automatischer Vorgang war. Solange alle Änderungen von Hand erfolgt sind (oder zumindest von Hand geprüft wurden) sollte es keine Probleme geben.

Um solche Missverständnisse zu vermeiden, würde ich Vorschlagen die MapRoulette challenge als Quelle mit anzugeben.

Entschuldige bitte das Missverständnis, aber bei so großen Changesets werde ich immer gleich Misstrauisch ;)
Timonade (2023-03-02 16:39:33+00:00): Alles gut danke für den Tipp ich kann dir versichern das ich das per Hand erledigt habe.
Anthony Nyberg (2023-03-04 07:09:17+00:00): all languages keyboard is a keyboard that allows users type in different languages. https://all-keyboard.com/
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
CaKlug (2023-02-28 16:45:30+00:00): ... habe ich mir das alles selber angeschaut. Die Hausnummer steht zweimal am Eingang. Wenn ich wüßte, wie es geht, würde ich hier ein Foto hochladen.
mueschel (2023-03-11 14:21:13+00:00): Hi,
it seems this import went wrong. All the nodes have several tags that shouldn't be in OSM, e.g.:

adresse = PLACE HAUTE
code_insee = 92012
commune = BOULOGNE-BILLANCOURT
geo_point_2d = [48.83063751751317,2.236293806846958]
Abijan (2024-11-01 14:28:59+00:00): dit pad zie ik niet op luchtfoto's, is dit aanwezig, hoe zit dit?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1113373829
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
ASamyDes (2023-02-28 17:23:35+00:00): Please check Egypt Post before making any changes to this
https://geoportal.egyptpost.org/explorer/postalcode-ar.html
NieWnen (2023-03-01 09:41:58+00:00): Ale nie zmieniaj nazwy ulic przed upływem 2 tygodni od publikacji.

To nawet jeszcze nie obowiązuje – nie mówiąc o tabliczkach.

+ tutaj połączyłeś 2 drogi z różnym oznakowaniem w tagach.

Zmianę wycofałem (133163936). 
Nazwę przywrócę za 2 tygodnie.
kasztelan111 (2023-03-01 14:25:02+00:00): aj rzeczywiście, zmiany nazw dopiero po dwóch tygodniach, mój błąd, dzięki za czujność
NieWnen (2023-03-15 10:04:29+00:00): Przywróciłem nową nazwę.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-01 00:21:43+00:00): Do not do "holes" in an area in the manner in which you have.  This is not correct.  A relation should be used instead to punch out (or exclude) an inner area of a feature.

This area and others have been updated accordingly to follow OSM best practices.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
punkpenguinprincess333 (2023-02-28 21:32:23+00:00): Hi Agent_Ibru!

The polygon for the playground already exists, so you don't need to add an additional point to represent it. For the accessibility information, use the wiki page to see the tags. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dplayground

Here are some tags you can use rather than lumping the information in the description: 

surface=* - grass, sand, rubbercrumb, woodchips etc
wheelchair=yes/no/limited if the equipment can be used by wheelchair users
min_age=* Minimum age of the user in years
max_age=* Maximum age of the user in years
operator=* - eg, the name of the local council or school
opening_hours=*
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133137742
hdevine825 (2023-03-05 01:57:21+00:00): I also wanted to note about the restrooms mentioned in the description. There is probably already a building for it on the map from the NYC buildings import. If it doesn't have amenity=toilets you can add that as well as the accessibility information you mentioned.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133137742
Jordi MF (2023-03-07 23:39:27+00:00): Hola illustietor,
He corregit el nom de la font perquè, en valencià, els articles de noms propis van en minúscula a excepció de les urbanitzacions o llocs privats. Però els topònims tenen els articles en minúscula. Exemple: la Font Tallada, la Joquera, la Marseta, el Volaor...
Salutacions,
Jordi
user_1566574 (2023-07-16 07:54:15+00:00): Hello !
Pourquoi cette modification ? Tout est très touristique à Métabief, et les fromageries comme d'autres font bien l'identité du Haut-Doubs. J'ai du mal à comprendre, si tu veux m'éclairer ça serait top. Merci ! :)
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-01 00:23:45+00:00): Same thing as the other comment I left you.  Please use a multipolygon relation to add "holes" to an area.  The manner in which you did it is not correct.

Refer here for more info, and reach out if you have questions:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
Hufkratzer (2023-02-28 22:35:11+00:00): Hi,
You have removed building=yes from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149535834, therefore this is no longer rendered as a building.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150216711 also seems to be a building, but you have tagged it leisure=horse_riding.
These buildings don't need the tag leisure=horse_riding because they belong to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186525070 (Écurie Mustesch), compare
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
pitscheplatsch (2023-03-04 11:49:34+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133138983
pitscheplatsch (2023-03-04 11:49:26+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133138808
bxl-forever (2023-02-28 21:40:45+00:00): Hello,

If you add housenumbers, please be extremely careful about not creating duplicates.

In this change, you added number 124 on the building here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244497496

But number 124 was already set on the building here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244497149/history

Duplicate numbers on the same street are not supposed to exist.  If the building structure is faulty, do not hesitate to report it—many buildings have been traced on official UrbIS data, which is the official reference in Brussels, but there are occasional mistakes in official data— StreetComplete is usually a nice app but it can ruin the database integrity easily too; I think there is an option that says "this building has no number".

Thanks in advance.  Have a nice day.
SomeoneElse (2025-10-09 14:37:34+00:00): Hello,
https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/relation/15543659 is both "network=nwn" and "network:type=lwn".  It looks pretty "local" to me; is there anything that I am missing?
Best Regards,
Andy
b-unicycling (2025-10-12 10:05:15+00:00): The purple arrows are apparently used as part of a national network of loops. Make of that what you will.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-28 19:36:57+00:00): Do not change roadways to
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-28 19:58:01+00:00): Do not change roadways to cartpaths, as this is not correct.  They shall remain as roadways.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-28 20:00:12+00:00): Reverted in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133144346
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-01 02:22:01+00:00): What was the source of your information for road surface etc on Forest Park Lane? Why did you change Korinek Court to a driveway, as named driveways are very rare?
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
gscholz (2023-03-04 09:28:25+00:00): Hi arnoncorado,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of "Engenheiro Franca" and "Ubaíra":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-39.74475&lat=-13.41772&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133140653

I have just fixed this error:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133282032

Guido
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-28 19:34:40+00:00): Please use moredetailed changeset comments.  What did you change, and why?
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-28 18:30:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356809738

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:01:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:02:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:00:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:00:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:02:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-28 18:40:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150236160
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150236159

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-03-02 01:03:04+00:00): Kirkegade har surface "sett" og ikke cobblestone.

Og access=yes kan ikke være rigtigt.
Du mener nok motor_vehicle=yes.
Audrey_2506 (2023-03-03 08:08:49+00:00): Il faudrait annuler cette suppression
Gonéo (2023-03-03 09:12:45+00:00): Restauré : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10596621778
syntex (2023-03-01 14:51:41+00:00): Złączyłeś drogę ze strefą płatnego parkowania
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-05-21 09:03:48+00:00): Road names should not be abbreviated.
user_18570134 (2023-03-01 13:39:04+00:00): Nice work here.
Dockslip1 (2023-04-27 13:39:55+00:00): Thank you, there is more to go but I am happy to be fixing
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-03-02 01:05:39+00:00): access=yes på Apotekerstræde
kan ikke være rigtigt.
Måske mener du motor_vehicle=yes?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 10:58:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .