piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gurglypipe (2026-01-08 14:09:16+00:00): Hi, I don’t know if you saw my comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176859965, but please do consider aligning the aerial imagery to OSMUK Cadastral Parcels before adding lots of geometry like this.

The houses look great, and Thornhill is better mapped now, but someone is going to have to realign them all to ground truth at some point in the future and that could have been easily avoided. :)
kingkingHK (2026-01-08 13:50:32+00:00): Is there really a viewpoint here?
Kovoschiz (2026-01-09 07:24:08+00:00): Maps.me / Organic Maps users uploading personal use data. Can be removed on sight.
krza (2026-01-08 13:41:39+00:00): Main changes beside some additional minor changes and adjustments:

- landuse=forest --> natural=wood (see according key definitions for clarification)
- name=ZoneX removed from service highways (there is no ground truth for that and was irritating/misleading/implausible anyway)
- boundary=place + place=neighbourhood + name=ZoneX added as zone boundaries (the usual apps may not render it though)
- added in-door footways in market dome in order to allow routing through the building and a better clarity when using map apps
- added according entries to the building as well as all known emergency exits for the sake of completeness
- adjusted the position of some store nodes
- noexit=yes --> amenity=parking (for all affected parking places because the noexit flag makes no sense there but the parking flag does)
- Zone 6 may be taken as a kind of template for further updates in the other zones:
- Zone 6 only: all bungalows connected to roads resp. parking places (added footways to their doors)
- Zone 6 only: all parking places added as explicit areas
- Zone 6 only: bubbles/blisters removed from wood areas which had represented parking places before

Changeset 1: 176948774
Changeset 2: 176984353
eggie (2026-01-08 14:46:15+00:00): Dag AvN  Lijkt me correct als het alleen voor landbouwverkeer is. . Alleen tracktype=grade2 klopt niet met surface=dirt.
Dan zou het grade3 of lager moeten zijn.
grade2 is bv gravel. 

MVG
eggie
Frank Peng (2026-01-13 00:05:34+00:00): Please make sure to provide sources for street name changes like this. It looks like you corrected some street names around here. Make sure to provide sources for street name changes or corrections in your changesets.
Userfriendly321 (2026-01-08 13:29:27+00:00): Incorrect position
NeisBot (2026-01-09 06:48:31+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11411715386 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "RV park in North Central Florida"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 08:47:57+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177363896
(Deleted leftovers after several edits)
Colbertson (2026-01-08 18:32:42+00:00): Šim nepareizs wikidata
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/346391470/
HellMap (2026-01-08 18:43:17+00:00): Hmm, interesanti, kāpēc tā sanāca. Es it kā  pārbaudīju sarakstu. Te pat nosaukums pilnīgi cits un it kā nekādīgi nesaistīti. Paskatīšos visu vēlreiz. Paldies, ka pamanīji.
HellMap (2026-01-08 19:43:45+00:00): Cerams, ka izlaboju ar https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176998075 . Man visi dati ar dienu kavēšanos no dump`iem, tāpēc nevarēšu uzreiz pārbaudīt un salīdzināt visu.
Rainero (2026-03-22 20:48:06+00:00): Revert mit changeset/180271539
(unzulässige Quelle)
trigpoint (2026-01-11 17:25:44+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231
trigpoint (2026-01-11 18:25:03+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231
habi (2026-01-08 15:05:10+00:00): Ciao Braschgi
Nüt für unguet, aber ich glaub dieser Weg sollte nicht als Skipiste erfasst werden, auch wenn bei Schnee hier mit den Skis runtergefahren werden kann.

OpenStreetMap ist eine Karte, die weltweit von vielen Menschen verwendet wird, und wo nur sogenannt verifizierbare Dinge erfasst werden sollen. Zusätzlich denke ich, ist es nicht sinnvoll, wenn z.B. https://openskimap.org/ hier ein Skigebiet anzeigt.

Gruss aus Bern,
habi
habi (2026-01-08 15:05:41+00:00): Zurückgesetzt

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176988736
eggie (2026-01-08 14:47:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-01-09 06:48:35+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13439821097 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Débouchage de canalisations au val d'Oise et Ile-de-France"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : « Débouchage de canalisations au Val-d'Oise et en Île-de-France »
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 08:48:00+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177363898
(Deleted leftovers after several edits)
dodelinho (2026-01-10 19:36:43+00:00): AFAIK Zorelelor is only physically separated near the Delfinariu intersection. Any technical reason why you separated the whole street + virgil coman? Most of Zorelelor has a dashed line as far as I remember, marking it as two separate line interferes with vehicle routing (e.g. you don't need to go all the way to the street's end to turn)
Cris950 (2026-01-10 19:42:01+00:00): Yes, you are perfectly correct. I wanted to make the bus lines to look better on the map, but I forgot about this detail. 102 going on the street two times on the way to Pescărie messes with the routing.
Cris950 (2026-01-10 19:47:44+00:00): I’ll revert the changes. Thank you for pointing this out. I still have only a few months on OSM, I’m still learning about mistakes like these I could make.
NieWnen (2026-01-08 18:39:05+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tych zmian?
Tomek | Yanosik (2026-01-12 07:50:03+00:00): ślady gps
trigpoint (2026-01-11 17:25:03+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231
trigpoint (2026-01-11 18:24:24+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231
kuhni74 (2026-07-25 00:39:43+00:00): ein canal mit locks ist eigentlich was Großes, Schiffbares, also nicht etwas wie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1465339302, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:lock?uselang=de
Znaika (2026-01-08 16:22:40+00:00): Hi,
KiTa Bullerbü ist seit 2023 hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1054253770
Vermutlich von hier umgezogen. Kennst du das? An der Stelle sieht man an den Liftbildern, daß es eine Baustelle ist. Gruß, Znaika
Znaika (2026-01-08 16:41:20+00:00): Ich habe es rausgefunden und entsprechend eingetragen https://www.stadt-willich.de/leben-willich/familie-kinder-jugend/kinderbetreuung/kindertageseinrichtungen/kath-tageseinrichtung-st-irmgardis
SaPatz (2026-01-09 06:50:44+00:00): Hallo,
Laut Kita-online. Gibt es beide Kindergärten St. Irmgardis und KiTa Bullerbü.
In unseren Luftbildern sind die Gebäude bereits festig und auch in der Liegenschaftskarte eingetragen.
Wir aktualisieren gerade die KiTa Eigenschaften, da diese teilweise in OSM falsch getagt sind.
Grüße 
Katasteramt Viersen S. Claus
Znaika (2026-01-09 09:43:55+00:00): Hallo Claus,
es wäre super, wenn solche Informationen (soweit es vorhanden ist)  in OSM direkt eintragen werden.
capacity = 
contact:facebook = 
contact:instagram = 
email = 
max_age = 6
min_age = ?
opening_hours = 
phone =   
website = 
Gruß, Znaika
https://kitas-willich.de/
https://www.stadt-willich.de/leben-willich/familie-kinder-jugend/kinderbetreuung/kindertageseinrichtungen
SaPatz (2026-01-12 13:45:36+00:00): Hallo 
Danke für den Hinweis, diese Informationen liegen uns nicht dirket vor.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-11 07:43:09+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13439872395
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/907690497

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1420778612

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
YomanNH (2026-01-12 11:21:02+00:00): Barroszt, mógłbyś poprawić swoje błędy, a nie ignorować komentarze?
Jakie jest źródło informacji o tym punkcie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13439872395 ?
Poparzony (2026-01-12 12:15:57+00:00): Nie ignoruję komentarzy, naprawiam na bieżąco, dopiero co komentarze wysłał
Dodałem w tym miesiącu kilkaset nowych adresów, więc tymbardziej coś można przeoczyć, jednakże staram się poprawnie dawać adresy
Poprawię to oczywiście
SekeRob (2026-07-10 10:21:35+00:00): Hi  Kanstantsin Bykauskikh

Your ESRI offset aligning needs work. For Abruzzo the Ortophoto '18-'19 20cm with UTM-33N (EPSG-32633) adjustment is gold standard reference. Added flare tags, streetlamps while there.

Happy Mapping
(JOSM keeps a library of the EPSG- offsets)
ikostyabik (2026-07-14 11:47:17+00:00): Thanks for the feedback! I use the iD editor in OSM, so that Orthophoto isn't available to me. I'll be more careful with imagery alignment in this area. Thanks for fixing it.
NeisBot (2026-01-09 06:48:39+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1206454873 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Hotel para famílias em Brasil"
---
Por exemplo, uma versão mais neutra e factual do seu texto poderia ser: "Hotel para famílias em Brasil"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
Coleção Casa Hotéis (2026-01-09 20:21:02+00:00): Hotel para famílias em Gramado
NeisBot (2026-01-09 06:48:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1206238170 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Hotel in Serra near Gramado"
---
Por exemplo, uma versão mais neutra e factual do seu texto poderia ser: "Hotel em Serra perto de Gramado"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-18 08:48:02+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/177040324
A67-A67 (2026-01-08 15:15:13+00:00): This changeset readds the parking that was removed last year. I've reverted that part of the change.
bkleipool (2026-01-08 16:43:33+00:00): I didn't notice that, thanks for the correction :-)
NeisBot (2026-01-09 06:48:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13439906839 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Abogado penalista en Alicante"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Abogado penalista en Alicante"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
DonMapeo (2026-01-09 07:56:30+00:00): Perfect, sorry about the description. I thought it should be similar to the one on the official business listing on Google.

I'll edit it now.

Best regards
dzamper (2026-01-08 17:24:26+00:00): Kreis Osterode and powiat ostródzki are two different entitites:
* https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kreis_Osterode_in_Ostpreu%C3%9Fen
* https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powiat_Ostr%C3%B3dzki
dzamper (2026-01-08 17:23:20+00:00): Kreis Konitz and powiat chojnicki are two different entities:
* https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kreis_Konitz
* https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powiat_Chojnicki
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-25 03:36:06+00:00): DWG revert - apparent undiscussed import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177667924
dzamper (2026-01-08 17:04:07+00:00): Lankreis Warthenau and powiat zawierciański are two different entities, they even had different borders:
* https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landkreis_Warthenau
* https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powiat_Zawiercia%C5%84ski

And even if they were the same entity then the name would fit most likely not `name:de` but `old_name:de`
dzamper (2026-01-08 17:22:19+00:00): Kreis Putzig and powiat pucki are two different entities:
* https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kreis_Putzig
* https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powiat_Pucki
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-08 18:42:14+00:00): dzięki!
dzamper (2026-01-08 17:16:07+00:00): Landkreis Rosenberg and powiat oleski are two different entities, with different borders:
* https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kreis_Rosenberg_O.S.
* https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powiat_Oleski
VictorIE (2026-01-23 23:26:35+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13440004009/

There are maybe 12 untagged nodes along Herbert Park road, possibly meant to be trees.
dzamper (2026-01-08 17:21:12+00:00): Landkreis Heilsberg and powiat lidzbarski are two different entities, with different borders event:
* https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kreis_Heilsberg
* https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powiat_Lidzbarski
NeisBot (2026-01-09 06:48:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13439955820 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Appliance repair in Issaquah"
---
Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего текста могла бы быть: "Ремонт бытовой техники в Иссакуа"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 08:48:03+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177363900
dzamper (2026-01-08 17:12:39+00:00): Landkreis Allenstein and powiat olsztyński are two separate entities with different borders even:
* https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landkreis_Allenstein
* https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powiat_Olszty%C5%84ski
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-03 07:56:02+00:00): Properly split POI and building and added missing top-level tag for SEO spam POI in changeset 183579065

https://osm.org/changeset/183579065
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-25 03:36:07+00:00): DWG revert - apparent undiscussed import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177667924
Rainero (2026-03-22 10:39:24+00:00): Revert mit changeset/180242421
(unzulässige Quelle)
tux67 (2026-01-08 16:10:37+00:00): Hallo W Buehren,

bei OSM werden keine genrischen Namen verwendet.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_nicht_das_Name-Tag,_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176990962
NeisBot (2026-01-09 06:46:42+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 29 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/212803089 v1 | 18 crossings
https://osm.org/way/212794387 v5 | 11 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/2226039436 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176990973
NeisReview (2026-01-17 16:43:44+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177016868
NeisBot (2026-01-09 06:48:56+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13440061838 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Taksi w Sopocie"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Taksi w Sopocie"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-18 08:48:03+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/177241810
eggie (2026-01-08 17:08:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
InsertUser (2026-01-08 23:43:12+00:00): According to Mapillary imagery from November 2023 this looks like it becomes a mixture of highway=footpath and highway=steps that continues south of the way now called Greenwich Street North for some distance. 

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=950933753030826&focus=photo

Has this been torn up or do the steps continue through in a similar way to Dead Cat Alley?

The view looking north from Masons Addition looks like it shows steps but it's not clear if they connect from the photos:

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1488954401663509&focus=photo
BaboucheVerte (2026-04-29 13:49:07+00:00): Why did you remove tunnel=yes and put bridge instead for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150222011 ? It's completely wrong, it's underground for most of the place
NeisBot (2026-01-09 06:49:04+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1465362108 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Fahrzeugfolierung und Beschriftungsdienstleistungen"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Fahrzeugfolierung und Beschriftungsdienstleistungen"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 10:53:46+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177368019
JimmyWOO (2026-07-09 07:39:36+00:00): 为何海鸥公路是tertiary
SomeoneElse2 (2026-01-11 12:19:25+00:00): Hello,
Not sure if it was this edit or not, but it looks like relations to NCN2 here fell foul of some of the bugs in iD where you can't see which relation you're adding to (see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/id-visibility-of-relations/138374/2 ).  The eastbound route was added to the superrelation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1950688 rather than the local section https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13725878 .  I've filled in the gap.
Cheers,
Andy
Adam Edwards (2026-01-14 12:00:21+00:00): Thank you for fixing this.
rempshaener (2026-01-08 19:15:28+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du diesem Änderungssatz habe ich folgende Anmerkungen:
- Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie.
- www.openstreetmap.org/node/13440124897: Das wäre in der Regel ein offener Tank zur Löschwasserentnahme, was aber nicht zum Luftbild passt. Worum genau handelt es sich?
- Du hattest den Node www.openstreetmap.org/node/2183402942 verschoben und mit anderen Objekten verknüpft, das habe ich gerade korrigiert.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
NeisBot (2026-01-09 06:49:06+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13440114959 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Law firm in Virginia Beach"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 10:58:02+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177368202
(Deleted leftovers after several edits)
mat (2026-05-12 07:02:42+00:00): Bonjour,
Est-ce que le pont a ré-ouvert ?
Nathanaël Martel (2026-05-12 07:10:17+00:00): oui, j'ai complètement oublié de le remettre
rempshaener (2026-01-08 18:53:42+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Für amenity=fire_station gibt es drei Modelle:
- Handelt es sich ausschließlich um einen Gebäudeteil, wird das Gebäude als building=* erfasst und das amenity=fire_station als Node oder kleine Fläche in den Gebäudeumriss gepackt.
- Handelt es sich um ein kleines Gebäude ohne Umlagen, kommen das amenity=fire_station und building=fire_station gleichzeitig auf den Gebäudeumriss. Die ways werden nicht „gestapelt“.
- Ist das Wachgelände größer, kommt das  amenity=fire_station an den Geländeumriss, das building=fire_station an das Gebäude.

Bitte melde dich, wenn du Hilfe bei der Anpassung brauchst.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße