piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GerdP (2025-04-09 06:50:45+00:00): Nachtrag: Bei https://www.osm.org/node/12273118907
ist z.B. die Leitung 1.4 m entfernt. Manchmal sind es auch +50 m
Kannst Du mir bitte sagen, woher du die Leitungsdurchmesser hast?
StC (2025-03-12 20:44:53+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité du Sentier des Douaniers qui passe par là.  Est-ce qu'il n'y a vraiment plus de communication entre la rue des Fontaines et le parking en face ?
Dazeilad (2025-03-13 08:11:37+00:00): Bonjour,
Il n'y a plus de communication routière en effet, l'accès du parking étant à présent payant il n'y a plus qu'une seule entrée et des plots ont été placé pour bloquer l'ancienne route vers la rue des Fontaines. La communication piétonne subsiste évidemment.
StC (2025-03-13 09:15:43+00:00): Merci ! Alors c'est un tag barrier=bollard qu'il aurait fallu ajouter sur un noeud plutôt que de supprimer un chemin.
NeisReview (2025-03-12 07:04:01+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-24 00:03:31+00:00): Reverted by DWG - vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164009607
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 21:31:10+00:00): can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4734066 ?

you made this peak higher than Mt Everest
Kovoschiz (2025-03-12 08:22:42+00:00): Please don't use machine translation, especially if you can't even choose Japanese correctly. Your Mandarin didn't even translate "古".
Jade Jossen (2025-03-12 16:14:19+00:00): Hello, I appreciate the help. It is very difficult to find actual translations for these POI because they are so small, and there isn't a clear translation on Google. If you have a better translation, please change it. But having something in Roman characters would be useful to folks who do not read Chinese.
Dimitar155 (2025-03-12 17:18:35+00:00): Hi Derkoenig,

The tram lines (near way/1366333150) do end at the places where I've marked them. I know that it doesn't look aesthetically good on the map but it is what it is :).

Happy mapping,
Dimitar
Kovoschiz (2025-03-12 08:30:29+00:00): Please don't make up random translations on your own. There's already the English naming around here.
Jade Jossen (2025-03-12 16:13:44+00:00): Hello, I appreciate the help. It is very difficult to find actual translations for these POI because they are so small, and there isn't a clear translation on Google. If you have a better translation, please change it. But having something in Roman characters would be useful to folks who do not read Chinese.
NeisBot (2025-03-11 20:42:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
Floremma (2025-03-12 21:33:40+00:00): HI! I've made the changes requested, I think I free it from marketing language. Please let me know if i have to go further on that description.
NeisReview (2025-03-13 06:45:50+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/163546349
MarcoR (2025-03-12 11:25:33+00:00): tutto ok a parte un refuso che ho corretto (cingiale → cinghiale).

Buon mapping,
Marco
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163501750
Glassman (2025-03-12 16:43:43+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163501781
Exe19 (2025-03-14 10:47:02+00:00): Czemu usunąłęś obszar residentiala z Szybu Bartosza? Jest on wyraźnie widoczny w BDOTcie i w terenie (Ortofotamapa się myli!)?
Exe19 (2025-03-14 10:49:25+00:00): ^ Przepraszam, to miało być pod #162988517. Przekierowało mnie na zły changeset po zalogowaniu
NeisReview (2025-03-12 07:04:31+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-24 00:03:32+00:00): Reverted by DWG - vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164009607
Glassman (2025-03-12 16:48:13+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

It looks like you moved an address from the correct location. See https://gisweb.jeffcowa.us/LandRecords/ for address data. Can you fix this? Let me know if  you need assistance.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163502010
Glassman (2025-03-12 17:02:58+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163502095
Filip009 (2025-03-15 11:52:55+00:00): Zdravím, tým, že ste to zmenil na jednosmerku sa z ulice Ladslava Exnára nedá odbočiť vľavo na cestu 524.
Timecom (2025-03-15 12:09:24+00:00): Ahoj, dakujem za radu. Nenapadol ma tento problem, ja som tam dokreslil celu tu odbocku, pretoze doteraz vobec neexistovala moznost odbocit zo spodu z hlavnej dolava na Exnara a vsetky navigacie to smerovali cez odbocku na J Horaka o cca 300 metrov vyssie. Takze ak by som to chcel opravit spravim ten najvrchnejsi usek Exnara ako objosmerny ? Ten bol jednosmerny aj doteraz, takze ta nemoznost odbocenia o ktorej vravis tam bola vlastne asi aj doteraz.
Filip009 (2025-03-15 12:16:47+00:00): Bola tam relácia zákazu odbočenia vľavo z 523 (z juhovýchodu) do ľava, ktorá zabraňovala odbočeniu. Vymazal som ju, takže do 24 hodín by to malo prejsť aj do navigačných algoritmov.
Timecom (2025-03-15 12:25:08+00:00): Dakujem za pomoc
Glassman (2025-03-12 17:02:28+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163502253
grzegorz75jan (2025-03-11 22:47:59+00:00): Jakieś potwierdzone informacje o tej szerokości rzeki  i czy dotyczy całej jej długości ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163502266
topola (2025-03-12 08:04:26+00:00): chciałem dać na wysokości Brzeska, a informacje to zdjęcia satelitarne plus obserwacja własna
grzegorz75jan (2025-03-12 09:59:11+00:00): Ta szerokość to taka informacja i trochę dezinformacja. Jeżeli zostanie lub usuniesz to świat się nie zawali. Uszwica jest członkiem relacji ale nie powinno być problemu gdyby podzielić linię przynajmniej w edytorze Josm bo w iD to nie wiem i wtedy dodać tą szerokość w okolicy Brzeska bo to i tak podaje się uśredniony wymiar. Zrób jak uważasz.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163502266
Glassman (2025-03-12 17:02:50+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163502299
Syl (2025-03-12 09:19:20+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai passé le nom en description comme ce n'est pas réellement le nom.
Lyon-St-Clair (2025-03-12 17:31:47+00:00): pas de soucis
Syl (2025-06-17 15:44:02+00:00): Je viens finalement de le passer en planned:, il n'y a pas encore de chantier ici.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-03 17:59:11+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12653521944/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
tastrax (2025-03-12 22:21:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits - FYI Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  

To get the + symbol on a mobile device numeric keypad you may need to do a LONG press on the zero (depends on device).

I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
pavvv (2025-03-11 23:33:57+00:00): Most nad Kasiną to prawidłowa nazwa własna. Patrz TERYT i https://geoportal.wroclaw.pl/poi/u/869/mostNad%20Kasin%C4%85
olo81 (2025-03-11 23:38:04+00:00): Dzięki, trochę szok.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-03-23 10:15:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163979213 where the changeset comment is: Following on from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163963906 , and see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/about-mapping-features-with-computer-vision/127790 - reverting some 'AI detected swimming pools', some of dubious quality.
Yog Sot (2025-03-18 13:46:28+00:00): sprawdzaj dokładnie co zapisujesz, bo wygenerowałes błędy geometrii, które inni muszą po tobie poprawiać. 
Jak będziesz w przyszłości generował zmiany z ostrzezeniami, to będa wycofywane w całości. 
Naprawiaj ostrzezenia przed zapisem.
grzegorz75jan (2025-03-11 22:54:20+00:00): Ciekawy opis "zagospodarowanie terenu"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

https://youtu.be/xBMIoypkdI4?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5&t=2596 > opisy
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163503074
olo81 (2025-03-11 23:40:45+00:00): Jeśli w jednym zestawie zmian jest wiele różnych edycji, różnego typu to jak byś opisał zestaw zmian?
Glassman (2025-03-12 17:04:03+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163503109
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-11 21:31:15+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10293363866

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-11 21:31:07+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12154421459
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1292081424

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-08-21 20:46:55+00:00): naprawione
NeisReview (2025-03-12 07:04:51+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
NeisReview (2025-03-12 06:50:12+00:00): #DataImport

Hi, welcome to OSM!

With this changeset, you've added a significant number of features that appear to share similarities in their tags (such as type=Feature). Could you please let us know more about the source of your mapping activity? Is this a data import?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks!
Arefsn89 (2025-03-13 07:45:51+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your message.
Yes the footprints are imported and they come from Microsoft Building Footprints (https://github.com/microsoft/GlobalMLBuildingFootprints). Any footprints that overlapped with existing ones at the time of upload were left out.

Kind regards 
Aref
Allison P (2025-03-14 22:01:49+00:00): You should tag with source=microsoft/buildingFootprints then.

Was this import discussed anywhere? It is clearly not properly manually reviewed. I did a random spot check.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1366360594
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1366360179
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1366359998
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1366360532
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1366360319
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1366360650
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1366360345
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1366360154
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1366359805
geow (2025-03-12 09:30:33+00:00): Vielen Dank, Varius32 für die Korrektur und herzlichen Glückwusch zu deinem  ersten (?) Änderungsatz mit iD :-)
Grüße,
geow
Glassman (2025-03-12 17:09:45+00:00): It looks like you deleted some features that were tagged as abandoned. Those are allowed in OSM but shouldn't show up on trail maps.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163503491
Adam Franco (2025-03-11 21:38:12+00:00): Reverted accidental import of reference data

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163503570
Glassman (2025-03-12 17:06:20+00:00): I'm guessing there is a roof over the gas pumps. It's best to tag the polygon as building=roof + level=1. Adding the level tag allows service road to go under the roof without causing a validation error.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163503763
zuicz (2025-03-15 10:19:20+00:00): cześć, jest jakieś narzędzie w josm do przenoszenia relacji? np. jak tu z linii na punkt
pavvv (2025-03-15 10:44:49+00:00): zdaje się że to https://github.com/praszuk/josm-busstoptool-plugin?tab=readme-ov-file#busstoptool-plugin
olo81 (2025-03-15 12:02:52+00:00): Właśnie ktoś o tym pisał ostatnio na discordzie i testuje. Tylko próg wejścia w to jest cieżki.
Marek-M (2025-03-16 12:54:50+00:00): Do przerzucania członków relacji z jednego obiektu na inny w JOSM używam pluginu https://github.com/praszuk/josm-movemembership-plugin

Jest to proste i intuicyjne narzędzie - zaznaczasz pierwszy obiekt z czlonkami relacji, z shiftem zaznaczasz obiekt docelowy -> Przycisk 'Move object memberships' i w okienku wybierasz, których członków relacji chcesz przerzucić.
zuicz (2025-03-18 18:37:44+00:00): dzięki wielkie!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-24 00:03:33+00:00): Reverted by DWG - vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164009607
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-24 00:04:28+00:00): See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17446
PizzaTreeIsland (2025-03-13 10:58:29+00:00): Thank you for adding the buildings! Please don't add any tags to the nodes, only the way when mapping buildings. The corners of the building don't need an extra "building=house" tag. 

Thank you and happy mapping!
Arefsn89 (2025-03-13 11:50:59+00:00): Sure :)

Kind regards
Aref
eggie (2025-03-12 07:36:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-11 22:25:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/741197694

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
syntex (2025-07-03 23:15:29+00:00): Naprawione
eggie (2025-03-12 06:39:20+00:00): Hoi..
Tip..
..bicycle en foot =designated is default op fietspaden. Dat svp niet bijtaggen.

Mvg..
eggie
eggie (2025-03-12 07:47:36+00:00): Een fietspad dat begint op een voetpad (Erasmuslaan) werkt niet.
eggie (2025-03-12 07:56:53+00:00): Die 'fietspaden'heb ik weer omgezet naar path met bicycle en foot=yes  Dat zijn geen officiële fietspaden.
MVG
eggie
turtlepaddles (2025-03-12 02:37:53+00:00): jumbanho - thank you! 
I finally got back to this work (many hours after starting it) and it appears you finished it up already (and probably fixed a lot of my shoddy work). I'm not a very experienced editor, and was learning as I worked, so I appreciate the time you put into this. It's looking great!
Linus W Frische (2025-03-11 22:25:17+00:00): Source: Notes
Famlam (2025-03-15 11:36:24+00:00): Hoi  Johan,

Je hebt nu de fietsenstalling vlakbij de rotonde als voetgangersgebied ingetekend. Herstel je het even? 

Mogelijk bedoelde je highway=path tussen de rekken door
eggie (2025-03-12 07:37:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
habi (2025-03-12 08:35:52+00:00): Ciao Celine

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Du hast hier das Universitätsgebäude (`building=university`) zu einem Einfamilienhaus ( `building=house`, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dhouse) umgewandelt.
Ich glaube, das ist ein Übersetzungsfehler deinerseits, und habe das rückgängig gemacht.

Weiter hilft 'xd' im Änderungskommentar nicht zu verstehen, was du gemacht hast, Kommentare sollten deine Änderung verständlich machen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Bei irgendwelchen Fragen gerne hier in den Kommentaren nachhaken oder bei https://c.osm.org/c/107 eine Diskussion eröffnen, wir versuchen gerne zu helfen

Ä Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi
habi (2025-03-12 08:36:24+00:00): Rückgängig gemacht

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163517100
SHB2000 (2025-03-17 04:12:15+00:00): This change directly goes against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Roads#Road_Hierarchy and what was agreed upon at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Archive_1#Hume_Highway – at the very least I'm reverting the motorway-grade bypasses.
sirnigelgresley (2025-03-17 04:54:44+00:00): I don't believe my change goes against the guidelines, as the first link you provided specifically states that motorways should have "limited access via interchanges".  This is not true, as while there are interchanges at Nabiac and Bulahdelah, there are three at-grade intersections with major roads (The Lakes Way south, Willina Road, and Failford Road).  

Furthermore, the guidelines also state that motorways should be M-roads.  This section of the highway is signed A1, so it does not qualify.  The Hume Highway is built to the same standard, but since it is signed M31, it counts as a motorway.
SHB2000 (2025-03-17 08:11:27+00:00): I didn't change Nabiac and Bulahdelah was built to motorway standards (the bit you're referring to isn't part of the bypass) – but as per that discussion I linked earlier it's been a long-standing practice to sign freeway-like dual carriageways in NSW as motorways for the good part of 18 years now and this change directly goes against it, but I'm okay waiting to see if this section ever gets upgraded to M1.

However, in the meantime, please keep Taree, Kew, Raymond Tce, Bulahdelah, and Karuah as-is as these are uncontroversially motorways.
mueschel (2025-03-12 08:57:08+00:00): Hi,
I don't think that adding private power meters is within the scope of OSM. In general we do not map installations in private residential buildings for privacy reasons, and this seems to be one. 
I'd like to ask you to ask for some opinions on that in the forums.
aharvey (2025-03-12 23:23:55+00:00): I think what @philt3r is trying to do here is mark houses which have an electricity connection from the grid. I think that would be okay, you can observe this from overhead wires from the street, although that doesn't work in areas where the network is underground.

I think it's useful data, but perhaps the specific tags need discussion, and we need to ensure we're not using copyrighted data sources from Essential Energy.

Looking forward to hearing back from you @philt3r
aTarom (2025-03-12 14:05:18+00:00): Hello, a doubt please. Is the tag "no"="seated" a mistake or does it have a meaning?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/631945479/history
Cheers
leon1912 (2025-03-12 16:43:44+00:00): Hi, thank you for your comment. I've just changed it.
I set the tag wrong.
Thank you for noticing :)
kartler175 (2025-03-12 14:43:08+00:00): Das sind keine Multipolygone:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18810840
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18808048
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18806833

Multipolygone sind für Flächen. Sie haben nur Polygone (geschlossene Ringe) als Mitglieder!
Herzi Pinki (2025-03-12 15:53:13+00:00): Danke, war mir eh unsicher. Ist type=building der richtige Typ für die Stadtmauer-Relation?
Herzi Pinki (2025-03-13 10:17:26+00:00): ich habe das jetzt als site klassifiziert, hoffe das ist besser. Die Fehlermeldungen sind weg.
Ddps1337 (2025-05-19 17:36:14+00:00): Hi, why do you cancel my changes when I update the information about the establishments. I provide valid information, and you mark it as vandalism.
Ddps1337 (2025-05-19 17:42:16+00:00): Hi, why do you cancel my changes when I update the information about the establishments. I provide valid information, and you mark it as vandalism.
drygdryg (2025-05-19 17:49:21+00:00): Hello. I noticed that you rolled back my edits where I added new POIs, updated opening_hours, phone numbers, websites, etc.
Why do you consider my editing vandalism?
For example, I clarified the data on the following POIs:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1622097626/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298012072/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299590508/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1622097626/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9369766124/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8643361560/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12115436572/history
You've reverted my edits. May I know why you did that?
Mazda05 (2025-05-20 10:16:11+00:00): Ddps1337, відповідь, щодо об'єктів, які ви змінювали, яким повернуті коректні значення тегів, надана у https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163270384. "valid information" там немає — в ваших правках є порушення угод спільноти, видалення тегів, додавання некорректних значень тегів, що є вандалізмом. Якщо є якісь інши об'єкти — надайте посилання на них.


drygdryg, прошу вас ознайомитись з угодами спільноти, wiki OSM, щоб позначати значення тегів коректно, та Конституцією і законами України, щоб мати розуміння, які об'єкти мають відношення до уряду, а які не мають.
gmortimer (2025-03-17 14:51:42+00:00): Careful not to create roadways that overlap existing buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163506413
Glassman (2025-03-12 17:14:50+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163506426
muralito (2025-03-12 12:20:03+00:00): Hi. Please verify. In Atucha case you tagged the element "generator" but the wikidata refers to the "plant".
muralito (2025-03-12 12:21:26+00:00): And the plant was already tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193415212
muralito (2025-03-12 12:24:59+00:00): Nucleara reactors (power generator) like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299679357 should be linked to wikidata instances of "nuclear reactor" like this https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q11959563
Sadads (2025-03-12 13:43:19+00:00): Hi @muralito -- I am still learning how this works -- apologies if I made a mistake -- so only the reactor itself should be labeled, not all the parts of the site? In that case, will change up my strategy for doing this going forward.