piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gaspouch (2024-03-21 07:48:31+00:00): Yes it's a "loc_name", I changed it, thanks !
Jordi MF (2024-03-23 20:23:10+00:00): Hola,
¿Quién denomina este tramo de desembocadura como "Río mierda"? Además, no es un río. Parece la desembocadura de una acequia.
Saludos.
Jordi MF (2024-04-12 07:03:50+00:00): Lo modifico por falta de respuesta. La denominación de "Río mierda" de solamente los metros finales del río, parece una simple descripción del estado actual de la desembocadura, lo cual no es correcto.
NeisBot (2024-03-19 15:45:46+00:00): Hello ParadoX_ZLWC, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments \n
Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
kechan (2024-03-19 13:34:34+00:00): forgot to put "overpass query" in the source
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-19 15:23:59+00:00): Do not "lollipop" areas to create simulated holes in an area.  You should use multipolygon relations instead.

This changeset has been reverted in part or full to remove "fake holes" in the area.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148866880
DaveF (2024-03-19 21:29:54+00:00): There's already a railway station.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6606087119

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1225772244
DaveF (2024-03-19 22:03:15+00:00): These aren't stiles
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11745256883

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dticket_validator
4004 (2024-03-19 22:54:41+00:00): I've mapped the validator separately - are you saying there are no stiles at the new building?
Good spot on the PT tags on the station building, thanks
DaveF (2024-03-19 23:23:28+00:00): These are barrier=stile
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dstile

You need turnstile?

Are the validators not on the turnstiles?
4004 (2024-03-20 23:18:21+00:00): Just realised there is a separate tag for a turnstile.
The validators for eg smart passes are just on posts outside the station. Normal ticket turnstiles are still there from what I understand
G_P_J (2024-03-20 14:15:29+00:00): Cześć, Twoja zmiana spowodowała zniknięcie całej Puszczy Bydgoskiej z mapy. Proszę o poprawę. 

Dzięki :)
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-19 15:25:29+00:00): Why did you delete all these features?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148862072
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-19 14:00:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11744690509

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ibanez (2024-03-19 17:26:52+00:00): Hallo,
kannst du bitte mal sagen auf welchen Ansatz deine Kartierung von Verbindungen zwischen zwei Knotenpunkten als Route basiert? Das ist meiner Meinung weder durch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsnetze_kartieren gedeckt, noch durch einen andere OSM Wiki Praxis. Eine Verbindung ist IMHO weder eine Route, noch sind die Knotenpunkte mit Namen (z.B. Osttangente Dannenbütteler Weg) vor Ort ausgeschildert. Gruß Jens
Jon Snow 47 (2024-03-19 17:41:10+00:00): Vandalism; This is false Wado city doesn’t exist. The name of the city is Warri please delete all edits made by this user
zaizone (2024-03-19 20:21:16+00:00): I think we could have found a better solution than deleting that POI. The wikipedia communtity accepts an article about that proposed city naming, why not considering a POI with "proposed" prefix in OSM ?
zaizone (2024-03-19 20:26:49+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix It could have been tagged "proposed:place=city" and "proposed:name=Wado City"
???
Jon Snow 47 (2024-03-19 20:31:14+00:00): No it should not be on the map because it is called proposed it wasn’t proposed by the state government or by the federal government they have been declared a terrorist organization by the state governments. If we keep accepting proposed names the entire maps will be filled with Wikipedia proposed countries and states.
Jon Snow 47 (2024-03-19 20:34:23+00:00): These are news articles calling them terrorist and responsible for pending war https://www.vanguardngr.com/2024/01/no-wado-city-in-warri-stop-the-slogan/amp/
Jon Snow 47 (2024-03-19 20:46:39+00:00): This is from the state government and the governor of the state warning that warri is Warri and no body can change that

https://bigpenngr.com/2024/02/14/gov-oborevwori-meets-olu-of-warri-speaks-on-attempted-renaming-of-parts-of-warri/
Jon Snow 47 (2024-03-19 20:47:16+00:00): Please do not add any Wikipedia proposals to the maps I work for the state government. If it is added again I will have to report to the OpenStreetMaps data teams. Thank you
zaizone (2024-03-19 21:51:49+00:00): I'm not really into "edit wars" and I'm not particularly concerned by this area. I was just correcting a place written in capital letters... I regret your overstatement about "terrorism" and "pending war" whitch is undocumented. I also regret you threated to report me to the DWG, that's not really clever.
Jon Snow 47 (2024-03-19 21:59:43+00:00): Please check the links added the statement by the local government and the state government clearly declared them terrorist if you say it is not documented then you’re being biased
zaizone (2024-03-19 22:34:03+00:00): I see some local disputes, in wich you are partisan. That word "terrorist" is not mentioned in these articles, its overstatement. I'm not in this local disputes. I wish you luck and courage. Cheers
canfe (2024-04-05 05:32:29+00:00): Cerca di dare geometrie precise: molti parcheggi son tutti storti.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-03-19 14:18:04+00:00): Currently I'm using [shop=food]+[cuisine=mantou]+[takeaway=only], I guess in future for Huajuan/Jianbing/Wowotou, maybe a new "shop=*" tag proposed for those kind of staple food shop is needed
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-14 19:55:45+00:00): If that disused CVS is now a Dollar General, then remove the disused:shop=yes tag and use the Dollar General preset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148864350
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-14 19:56:01+00:00): If that disused CVS is now a Dollar General, then remove the disused:shop=yes tag and use the Dollar General preset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148864350
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-19 14:42:47+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11745435370

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11745435356
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11745435365

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-03-19 15:02:30+00:00): Poprawione.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-19 14:42:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/197476092

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-03-19 15:01:54+00:00): Poprawione.
flohoff (2024-03-19 15:54:22+00:00): Moin,
du hast hier auf dem Fahrradständer das building=roof gelöscht - Warum? Es ist doch überdacht d.h. es ist ein Gebäude oder?
yunosh (2024-03-20 06:07:44+00:00): Nein, ich habe nur die Objektart von Dach zu Fahrradständer mit Dach geändert, weil das ja die eigentliche Funktion ist. Oder meinst du etwas anderes?
flohoff (2024-03-20 13:36:48+00:00): Dein Editor hat dabei das building=roof gelöscht. Kannst du hier im changeset gut sehen.

Flo
yunosh (2024-03-22 13:24:26+00:00): Verstehe. Aber das passiert automatisch, wenn der Objekttyp "Fahrradständer" den Objekttyp "Gebäude" ersetzt. Ich kann anscheinend im Editor nicht gleichzeitig building und amenity setzen, oder ich bin zu doof dazu.
canfe (2024-04-05 05:19:10+00:00): I parcheggi vanno collegati, altrimenti taggati come ho messo io.
Tomas Straupis (2024-03-19 16:23:22+00:00): Šaligatvių atskirais vektoriais nežymime, jei jie nėra atskirti fiziškai.
habi (2024-10-16 09:37:49+00:00): Lieber Lifetec AG Mensch

Hier hast du den Defibrillator mit `level=1.OG` erfasst.
Der `level`-Wert sollte nicht als Freitext erfasst werden, sondern mit ganzen Zahlen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:level
Kannst du das in Zukunft so machen?
Gruss,
habi
ceyu (2024-03-23 15:55:25+00:00): Just deleting the `amentiy=fixme` tag does nothing to alleviate the problem. Could you please decide on a proper amenity or undo this change?
habi (2024-03-23 18:32:01+00:00): I looked up the website, corrected the phone number and searched for https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dpasta but forgot to add the tag.
Thanks for noticing, I’ve corrected it now in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149063110
ceyu (2024-03-24 12:47:46+00:00): Thank you for taking care of it!
b0ssi (2024-03-20 10:12:15+00:00): Thanks for the catch; will see if this can be confirmed through local knowledge/survey by someone instead.
tekim (2024-03-20 13:57:55+00:00): Thanks!
b0ssi (2024-03-21 04:39:41+00:00): No worries! I have surveyed and redone the changes alongside another new restaurant in the corner (changeset 148942273).
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-29 22:52:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150683754, 150683768 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by user who did not reply to any changeset comments
Frans S (2024-03-21 13:09:32+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148865860
Frans S (2024-03-21 13:06:52+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)

Inaccurate mapped buildings with extensions.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148866159
Warin61 (2024-03-20 01:49:41+00:00): Hi,
Multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.32336&lat=-38.23221&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

The simplest method to correct this is to place the tag 'landuse=residential' on each way and then delete the relation. 

I'll leave it to you to make a correction?
Warin61 (2024-04-14 01:56:44+00:00): No response. Nil.
Frans S (2024-03-19 16:38:01+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
You tagged roads as highway=road, which is too generic.
Here, the most commonly used tags are:
traces <2 mtr wide: tag highway=path.
Other in rural areas : highway=unclassified.
Residential tag; only to be used in villages /towns
I adjust the taggings on this changeset.
Please use the correct tag in future mappings.
Be sure to connect parts of highways to each other with a node.
Please follow the outlines of a building precise. You mapped just a rectangular where buildings show an extension.,
and don't forget to tag each building
Best regards and keep mapping
quincylvania (2024-07-10 19:29:39+00:00): Hi jackflash1991, thanks for all your trail mapping. I'm curious, is there an official redundant route along the road here? I'm not seeing it on https://schuylkillriver.org/map/. Seems like the towpath trail is the preferred route and on-road biking is not necessary.
jackflash1991 (2024-07-10 19:45:45+00:00): There are two routes! The gravel trail gets busy with pedestrians on the weekend. Interesting that the road section is not on the interactive map but it's officially marked on the PDF map: https://schuylkillriver.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/2018_05_18_SRT_Map.pdf 

There's also official SRT signs with arrows at each turn if you want to check yourself using street level imagery.
quincylvania (2024-07-10 19:51:36+00:00): Very cool, thanks for the info. The PDF map isn't very clear given the scale, and it's 6 years old, but it's nice that it's signed. I've never taken the SRT north of Norristown, I'll have to get up there sometime.
jackflash1991 (2024-07-10 20:09:55+00:00): Montgomery County has this section of the SRT in their map too. Looks like it was updated this year and the scale is zoomed in for better route clarity: https://www.montgomerycountypa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/3462/Schuylkill-River-Trail-Brochure-June-2024?bidId=
quincylvania (2024-07-11 16:15:31+00:00): Nice find. I might add that as a source tag somehow on this section.
mtmail (2024-05-28 06:29:39+00:00): Is the "I’ve got isolates: 1 = 105 2 = 490 3 = 461B 4 = 514 5 = 511" a copy&paste mistake? Affects 4 buildings https://nominatim.org/qa/#map=18.66/51.39/-2.40&layer=postcode_bad_format
GrooveBox (2024-05-28 07:30:34+00:00): Many thanks for finding this.  Copy&paste error as you guessed. Now corrected.
Frans S (2024-03-21 13:04:34+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
For your info: 
A remark about mapping highways
How to decide when a trace is a path or an unclassified highway
First, look what they connect.  Houses, settlements, villages. Then measure the width of that trace.
In iDeditor 

Shortcut : Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle  opens measurement panel
Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.
If a trace is max 2 meters wide, tag it as a path.
Wider and connect hamlets, houses and villages should be tagged as unclassified.
Tag residential in urban areas (villages, towns)
In JOSM, use the measure tab, or draw a circle (round building, shortcut Alt-Z when the building plugin is installed)) between the shoulders of a trace and read the distance on the lower toolbar. (remove the circle after that)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
This is mentioned about tracks on the
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routing#Routing_considerations

Quote: Tracks are roads of agricultural purpose. They usually connect fields to farms. The surface sometimes makes them inaccessible for regular cars, or at least limits the speeds to a very slow pace. Tracks should always be avoided for through-going traffic or within urban areas.
Best regards
Grz3gorz00 (2024-03-19 15:40:19+00:00): swissredcross
Syl (2024-07-26 11:13:36+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai enlevé le nom "Cimetière" qui est en fait une description ainsi que quelques autres noms descriptifs autour. Dans OpenStreetMap on ne met un nom que si l'objet en a vraiment un.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 12:26:37+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11745710447/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop?
Marek-M (2024-03-19 18:22:50+00:00): Cześć, ta droga ma raczej charakter drogi dojazdowej a nie lokalnej. Nie jest nawet planowana żadna zabudowa wzdłuż tej drogi. Proponuję wrócić do highway=service
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-19 15:40:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4365404650
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/912932499

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
olo81 (2024-03-19 17:17:39+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
Nazwa jest tylko nazwą
Nazwy powinny być ograniczone do nazwy obiektu i nie powinny zawierać: kategorii, typów, opisów, adresów, uwag. Jeśli coś nie ma nazwy, to nie dodajemy jej. Jakakolwiek dodatkowa informacja powinna być dodana w dodatkowych tagach.
Marek-M (2024-03-19 18:24:32+00:00): Ta droga to chyba raczej highway=unclassified jeśli nie pasuje Ci highway=service. Ogólnie jej zadaniem będzie dojazd do pól oraz jak na razie do nielicznych zabudowań.
Pink Duck (2024-04-08 11:36:25+00:00): It still says Kettle Foods on the main building exterior (along with colourful graphic of 12 crisp packets)
Paul Berry (2024-04-08 11:53:23+00:00): There is a company registered to that address (https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/06242292) but I've put it back to the main one of Kettle Foods. Thanks for the tip.
Pink Duck (2024-04-08 11:55:44+00:00): Kettle Foods is actually owned by Valeo that bought out the Meat Snacks company. This site appears to be purely crisp manufacture.
pitscheplatsch (2024-03-19 17:53:28+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148874063
ivanbranco (2024-03-20 23:09:50+00:00): Hi Marion, you changed again the wikimedia_commons=* value to a url, it has been fixed only 4 days ago. Please read the wiki, especially https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons#Common_tagging_mistakes
Marion Halft (2024-03-21 09:24:37+00:00): Thanks for the hint!
olo81 (2024-03-19 17:58:51+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
SpinOff (2024-03-20 21:28:34+00:00): Tak jak powyżej, jeżeli łąka nie ma nazwy, usuń klucz name.

To jest jakieś bagienko?
Mariusz_Z (2024-03-21 09:32:00+00:00): Utworzone miejsce ma oficjalną nazwę "łąka deszczowa". Jest to specjalnie przygotowany teren z zainstalowanym nawadnianiem. Posadzone są tam rośliny lubiące wilgoć.
maraf24 (2024-03-22 10:53:53+00:00): Wygląda na nazwę opisową. Jeśli z tagu nie wynika taka funkcja, to można zostawić  w name.
RicoElectrico (2024-09-23 13:32:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4229183
olo81 (2024-03-19 17:30:08+00:00): Brak hydrantów w terenie?
olo81 (2024-03-19 17:34:17+00:00): Właśnie sprawdziłem i hydrant jest tam, tylko trochę przesunięty, i jedna sztuka.
Mariusz_Z (2024-03-19 17:36:10+00:00): Wszystkie hydranty na tym terenie zostaną zweryfikowane i zaniesione na mapę w najbliższym czasie
olo81 (2024-03-19 17:40:01+00:00): Pierw się weryfikuje, następnie usuwa lub przesuwa.
olo81 (2024-03-19 17:55:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1263824500
to miejsce przesunięte, obszarów nie łączymy z drogami a tu droga rozcięta nie tworzy ciągłości, pomieszanie z poplątaniem ta edycja
Mariusz_Z (2024-03-19 18:03:27+00:00): Poprawione, wyciągnę wnioski na przyszłość.
Langlaeufer (2024-03-19 17:16:03+00:00): Ich stelle mal die Frage hier:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ist-das-residential-oder-service-alley/110697
nick-28 (2024-03-19 19:16:54+00:00): Hallo Langlaeufer,

nach meiner Erfahrung mit Alleys in Nordamerika würde ich das hier als angemessen ansehen. Andernfalls highway=residential. Nur "service road" würde ich es nicht nennen, das erscheint mir zu schwammig, "driveway" o. ä. passt definitiv nicht. Nach Lesen des Threads würde ich im Endeffekt Flohoff zustimmen, zumindest was Deutschland betrifft, also highway=residential. Okay? 
Gruß, Nick
Langlaeufer (2024-03-19 19:32:45+00:00): Mir residential könnte ich auch leben. Teile aber flohoffs Ansicht nicht das service nur privat sein darf. Wir sollten aber ruhig noch 2 Tage abwarten.
nick-28 (2024-03-19 20:01:03+00:00): Ich würde mir bei service road schon etwas vorstellen, was zumindest teilweise privat ist, bzw. einen eingeschränkten Nutzerkreis hat, z.B. Zufahrt zu privatem Grundstück, zu Krankenhaus-Gelände, zu Gerichtsgebäude o.ä.. Eine für die Allgemeinheit zugängliche Straße mit Namen, die von der öffentlichen Hand unterhalten wird, würde ich nicht so taggen. Name allein reicht sicher nicht, das gibt es auch bei Privatstraßen. Alleys so wie ich sie kenne sind grenzwertig, da üblicherweise öffentlich, aber ohne Namen, meistens auf den Rückseiten der Gebäude (keine Adressen) und oftmals kaum instand gehalten.
Langlaeufer (2024-03-19 20:25:05+00:00): Eines Straße mit service=* ist noch niederrangiger als highway=service ohne service=*.  Für straßen mit service=(driveway,alley,drive-through) würde ich auch mit der privat-Annahme mitgehen - Für nur highway=service ohne service=* aber eben nicht. Aber wie gesagt - ich kann hier mit nur service oder residential leben. Nur alley sehe ich wie die meisten anderen im DE-Forum eben gar nicht.
nick-28 (2024-03-20 13:07:17+00:00): Wieso sollte der Rang einer Straße sich ändern, wenn man weitere Attribute hinzufügt? Der Logik kann ich nicht folgen. Das Fehlen einer näheren Beschreibung bedeutet i. A. doch nur, dass man es nicht genauer weiß. Nur highway=service ohne weitere Attribute würde ich deshalb auch nur dann verwenden, wenn man nicht weiß, wozu die Straße genau dient. Im vorliegenden Fall handelt es sich meiner Meinung nach um eine Anwohnerstraße, die für jeden zugänglich ist und als solche klar von einer Privatstraße o. ä. unterschieden werden sollte.
Langlaeufer (2024-03-20 13:56:32+00:00): Bei service eben nicht
Langlaeufer (2024-03-20 13:57:58+00:00): Aber eigentlich wäre es schlauer das mit allen im forum zu diskutieren als hier zu zweit.
nick-28 (2024-03-20 19:20:52+00:00): Zitat aus dem Wiki: "highway=service sind typischerweise nicht teil des öffentlichen Straßennetzes" 
Mit Ausnahme des Rechtschreibfehlers sollte damit doch eigentlich alles klar sein, oder. Ich werde die Diskussion jetzt aber ohnehin nicht fortsetzen, dazu fehlt mir die leider Zeit. Und im Endeffekt ist es mir auch nicht wirklich wichtig.
Langlaeufer (2024-03-20 19:41:42+00:00): Ich würde auf eine Einheitlichkeit der "Wege" in dem Viertel Wert legen. Der Rest ist mir mit Blick auf die Meinungsspanne in der Diskussion egal. Der Mehrheit folgend vermutlich dann doch residential.
Ansonsten findet im Wiki mal wieder jeder eine Stelle wo er seine Ansicht der Dinge bestätigt sieht. Zugegeben ist dein Punkt sehr präsent zu finden. Von daher entweder alles  bei alley lassen oder residential
Xvtn (2024-04-04 15:02:47+00:00): Hi! Can you double check the location here? It seems like this might be misplaced, but I could be wrong.
Dr_Fips (2024-04-04 15:27:13+00:00): I tried to place it as precise as possible, according to Google Maps: https://maps.app.goo.gl/n3LdZT2pPPARqf6g8
But I made a reservation there, so in about 4 weeks I can tell you for sure and pin the exact coordinates.
Dr_Fips (2024-04-04 15:40:05+00:00): According to the sattelite view it's indeed a few inches to the north, but I can't fix it right now.
Btw. there are a lot of very small campsites in this area. I didn't bother to add them all. Most of them are bookable on Airbnb.