piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2024-03-09 07:58:08+00:00): changed into bed_and_breakfast
Enock4seth (2024-03-14 11:51:16+00:00): Hi,
I have reverted this changeset, kindly don't add or move features you are not sure about, if you are still not sure what OpenStreetMap about, start from https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/
Enock4seth (2024-03-14 12:47:20+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping. I have reverted this changeset. If you are not sure about something, please don't add/change/move them. If you are still not sure what OpenStreetMap is about, here is a good start https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/
Enock4seth (2024-03-14 12:34:09+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping. I have reverted this changeset. If you are not sure about something, please don't add/change/move them. If you are still not sure what OpenStreetMap is about, here is a good start https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/
TrickyFoxy (2024-03-09 06:22:49+00:00): Вы сломали Вуоксу
Soshal Distan Singh (2024-03-12 14:17:58+00:00): @TrickyFoxy
Кажется, не в первый раз. Достаточно на историю отношения Вуоксы посмотреть: пачка правок от юзера, приходит кто-то исправить, опять пачка правок, снова кто-то чинит.
Человек, судя по всему, не умеет работать с мультиполигонами, и, к тому же, использует для этого неподходящий инструмент. Куча "натуралов" друг на друга накладывается. Короче, разгребать это всё (так, чтоб совсем по правилам, а не просто снова вода рендерилась) теперь тот ещё гемор (учитывая размер Вуоксы).
Печально...
TrickyFoxy (2024-03-12 14:23:25+00:00): Не, не всё так плохо. Человек не замечал сообщений и когда заметил, пришёл в тг-чат, где нормально всё объяснили.
TrickyFoxy (2024-03-12 14:32:59+00:00): Хотя, сейчас тоже сломалось, но из-за мелочи. Исправлю
Cmapuk-noxa6bl4 (2024-03-15 17:08:29+00:00): Здесь я тоже случайно оказался - нет же никаких уведомлений в Веб-интерфейсе, чтобы заметить сообщения. Да, я теперь знаю, что объекты с отношениями не должны иметь общих точек и пересечений, я за этим слежу. И, кстати, до сих пор сам натыкаюсь на свои же объекты с  такими неправильными наложениями и исправляю их, пока просто удаляя отношения. И, что странно, эти ошибки не"обезвоживают" Вуоксу, видимо, для поломки нужна более-менее протяжённая линия или более одного неправильного отношения поблизости...
gscholz (2024-03-09 06:36:56+00:00): Hi DJANDU,
this changesdet has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways which also had the wrong classification:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148402798

I have reverted it to fix those issues.

Please have a look at the highway basics before you continue and please avoid painting ways on top of each other:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway

Kind regards
Guido
rarad74 (2024-03-09 15:38:22+00:00): Giratoriile preiau rank-ul drumului/drumurilor cele mai importante din intersectie intotdeauna. Se intersecteaza acolo 3 drumuri care sunt tertiary road si un singur residential. Nu se pune niciodata residentialul. Te rog documenteaza-te si nu mai edita dupa capul tau. Multumesc.
WobuOG (2024-03-09 17:23:49+00:00): Comments like yours only serve to discourage new editors from contributing. It is better to explain and instruct, and not be snarky.
Would you rather I not contribute and those two roundabouts remain unmarked, as they were for more than a year?
rarad74 (2024-03-09 18:47:00+00:00): I am not snarky. I just explained to you 2 times how you must edit on this map, by folowing some rules.  And the first time you didnt respond. I think i was very clear. If you still dont want to understand and throw to me excuse words like "snarky" or discourage, then it is you problem, but yes, if you add these roundabouts without all needed tags, it is like you didnt add nothing.  I corrected what should be corrected. Thank you.
Mashin (2024-03-09 07:14:42+00:00): Hi, 
from CT ECO 2019 imagery it seem to me that the residential road continues even past this point and then a driveway forks off to the east. 
`Path` designation means that this way is to be used by pedestrians or bicycles (no cars), but you can see cars parked  behind this stretch. 
My interpretation is that the residential road continues further on and then a driveway starts on the right side.
Cheers
Mashin
fusfeld (2024-03-09 15:54:08+00:00): Path may be the wrong construct. Its turns into a dirt pathway but it is not a road by any means. I was on foot and stopped where the residential road clearly stops, which is where i marked it as a path, but that may be the wrong descriptor.
Mashin (2024-03-09 17:19:28+00:00): Maybe it's a shared driveway (highway=service + service=driveway). 
One can see cars parked past that point
https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=41.797353%7E-71.895874&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=1&pi=-9.4&style=x&dir=21.2
fusfeld (2024-03-09 17:21:08+00:00): That is probably closest to true. Just very poorly maintained (for the area) so hard to say. But that seems reasonable.
vanagaudi (2024-08-15 12:50:10+00:00): OSMCowboy deleted clear visible and regularly used tracks on dry riverbeds connecting allotments and farms to each other. Try to use Mapbox satellite images to verify. Even ways are used only during dry season they shouldn't be deleted.
OSMCowboy (2024-08-16 21:14:36+00:00): Hi vanagaudi, Thank you for the information. I can add the tracks back that were removed. As an additional note, it may be worth adding intermittent or seasonal tags to the tracks in this area. I am not sure which roads these tags would apply to, though. It would be helpful for any future users that may edit in the area if you are able to add this information. Have a great day!
Emilius123 (2024-04-28 17:22:05+00:00): Da ist wohl die Betriebserlaubnis erloschen.
Enock4seth (2024-11-26 14:27:19+00:00): Hi, How did you come up with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1259175324/history/1 ?
Enock4seth (2024-03-18 07:51:05+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping. I have reverted this changeset. If you are not sure about something, please don't add/change/move them. If you are still not sure what OpenStreetMap is about, here is a good start https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/
eggie (2024-03-09 06:18:17+00:00): 👍
Enock4seth (2024-03-14 13:06:57+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping. I have reverted this changeset. If you are not sure about something, please don't add/change/move them. If you are still not sure what OpenStreetMap is about, here is a good start https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/
Xvtn (2024-03-09 17:52:03+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your recent changes here. Looks great, no problems! One minor tip is that we can add the informal=yes tag to these paths to show that they aren't maintained (instead they only exist because people walk over them.) I also removed the name tag from them so it's clear they aren't part of the real Lake Overlook Trail.
Also, in the future, for edits like this it's usually good to provide a source for your info. (Local knowledge or in-person observations are excellent, valid sources.)
Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contributions!
ZeeDee (2024-03-09 20:19:41+00:00): Thank you!  The steps to edit were a little confusing. I still see dotted lines from the clued sac to the trail, so I’m not sure if the hikers will stop using our property.  We own this property and have people walking through it daily. When we let them know it’s private property, some are understanding but some are not. 
Hopefully making these edits will curb some of the foot traffic through here.  The path is sloped and rocky and I wouldn’t want to see anyone get hurt. Besides, the fact it’s private property, people should simply respect that.  
Thanks again.
~Deb
ZeeDee (2024-03-09 20:20:48+00:00): Sorry… spell check. 
And I meant to say dotted lines from the cul de sac
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-08 22:46:59+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356361307
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356361488

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Czarnieckiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418194173
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418195782

"Brożka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419006482
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419006573

"Łączna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423382066

"Dygasińskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428776369
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/678007263

"Ściegiennego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/881548214

"Jałowcowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/896141854

"Kwiatowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/896347533

"Dębowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905558933
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905558934

"Grabowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/962641280
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243255348

"Pustowójtówny":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1047489405

"Tymiankowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1061826233

"Rajska":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1061832991
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243794893

"Rudowskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1061921298

"Staszica":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063383987

"Radosna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1071625251

"Magnoliowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1165442849

"Miętowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175379537

"Zgoda":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1244184555

"Graniczna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1244752378

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Dimitar155 (2024-03-09 13:13:48+00:00): Всичко изглежда вярно. Някои пропуски са били по моя вина, благодаря че си ги оправил.

Само за алеята по Княз Борис I не съм сигурен. Доколкото помня, тя е от лявата страна (при движение в посока юг), но велосипедите се движат срещу колите (посока север). Ако караш колело в посока юг, колите ще те изпреварват от дясно, което не е много желателно.
tevildo_ (2024-03-09 13:16:44+00:00): Чудех се за нея, погледнах и знаците за велоалея са обърнати по посока на движението на колите, затова заключих, че е еднопосочна от лявата страна... Не знам, супер странно е там...
Dimitar155 (2024-03-09 13:31:45+00:00): Не знаех че има знаци. Последния път като минавах оттам беше само боя и няколко знака за забранено паркиране. Няма ли някой знак, който да указва броя на лентите и посоката им (примерно https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contraflow_lane#/media/File:Cycle_contraflow_Rennes_2.jpg)?
rowcherryrow (2024-03-11 20:38:46+00:00): Correction: Source used was Bing aerial imagery; Bing Streetside
mcliquid (2024-03-16 14:31:13+00:00): Hi, ob an diesem Bauwerk tatsächlich ein Name beschriftet ist würde ich ohnehin bezweifeln, aber wird hier wirklich die Luft vom Citytunnel über 500 Meter weiter auf Höhe des Pfändertunnels ausgetauscht?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237622680/history
mcliquid (2024-03-21 16:08:53+00:00): Geändert in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148971827
hlfan (2024-03-22 18:54:27+00:00): Hi!
Ich hab es nur für komisch gehalten, dass da ein extra Schacht ist, der nicht mit den Querschlag-Distanzangaben zusammenpasst. Deshalb hab ich die Version 1 vor meiner Involvierung wiederhergestellt, weil ich den Hauptgrund für meine erste Änderung deshalb genug infrage gestellt hab.
Da scheint tunnelbauer aber mehr zu wissen.
Enock4seth (2024-03-14 12:56:56+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping. I have reverted this changeset. If you are not sure about something, please don't add/change/move them. If you are still not sure what OpenStreetMap is about, here is a good start https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/
Xvtn (2024-03-09 17:45:43+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your change here. Looks great! One minor tip is that for rectangular features, you can select it and hit "Q" on your keyboard to square it up. That makes it look much nicer (and often you can draw things more sloppily and let the square feature fix it for you!)

Thanks for your contributions!
tastrax (2024-03-09 00:01:23+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Xvtn (2024-03-09 17:46:39+00:00): Looks great! Nice micro-mapping!
Enock4seth (2024-03-14 12:00:16+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping. I have reverted this changeset. If you are not sure about something, please don't add or move them. If you are still not sure what OpenStreetMap is about, here is a good start https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/
map per (2024-03-20 16:38:32+00:00): Hello Pablo Strubell,

you added the bank "Servibanca ATM"(1). Is there a staffed bank or just an ATM in this location?

Thanks and best regards
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11705766569
map per (2024-03-20 18:31:09+00:00): Thanks for the response, I removed ATM from the name and added atm=yes to the data object
Supaplex (2024-03-09 05:18:21+00:00): Hi, 

Can you split your changeset to a much smaller one, at least one restrain To Thailand and one to the Philippines?
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-17 01:34:38+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great. Could you please add also the valid changeset comment. You have modified and not deleted. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148405968
slice0 (2024-03-09 09:17:15+00:00): ??? what? I live in this area. it's time conditional but its perfectly fine to go right from maxwell terrace to brighton road here, you can go straight ahead onto jetty road too. why was this edit made?
slice0 (2024-03-09 09:20:00+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/perfectly-fine-and-legal-turn-now-deemed-illegal/110311
fortera_au (2024-03-09 09:23:35+00:00): Aerial and on the street imagery made it seem like it's a left hand turn only. I'll add it back in.
fortera_au (2024-03-09 09:28:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148413816 has added it back in.
GinaroZ (2024-03-10 15:33:31+00:00): Which OS map has this spelling? As Royal Mail, OS StreetView, and the latest out of copyright OS maps all have Clinthill
ExoMal (2024-03-10 20:46:34+00:00): Ah yes, I was maybe too hasty to change the spelling, if newer sources say so. Older historical sources (OS 25 Inch, 1892-1914) and this OS name book (https://scotlandsplaces.gov.uk/digital-volumes/ordnance-survey-name-books/fife-and-kinross-shire-os-name-books-1853-1855/fife-and-kinross-shire-volume-74/68) from the 19th century use "Clinkhill".

I did also, come across a recent story (https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13097547.Police_find_body_in_missing_jogger_hunt/) where a "Clinthill" is mentioned, so fair, I'll revert my rename, and maybe verify by survey sometime I'm in the area.
Đuro Jiří (2024-09-10 08:24:36+00:00): Scusa, perché divieto d'accesso?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1080419270/history#map=17/45.697891/13.153647&layers=N
pavvv (2024-03-11 17:54:09+00:00): Nie wiem skąd old_name:de, skoro wszędzie indziej jest name:de

RRR to skrót idealnie pasujący do definicji short_name. Ponadto jest często używany przez np. użytkowników SkyScraperCity, jeśli ktoś będzie chciał wyszukać co to jest, to akurat Nominatim wyświetli.

Oficjalna nazwa to Rondo Ronalda Reagana https://baw.um.wroc.pl/UrzadMiastaWroclawia/document/55325/Uchwala-LVII_3368_06
maraf24 (2024-03-23 23:10:42+00:00): Te nazwy nadane po odbudowie chyba w ogóle nie funkcjonują.
maro21 (2024-04-19 20:02:20+00:00): Możliwe, że to tylko taka ZDiUMowa nazwa wewnętrzna. Jednak ja tylko cofnąłem usunięcie nazwy, ale patrząc w historię, to ty dodałeś te nazwy:)

Wiele podobnych nazw kładek i innych obiektów, które są w SIP Wrocław jest też na OSM, te nie są jedyne.
Co proponujesz?
pavvv (2024-04-19 20:36:43+00:00): Moim zdaniem nazwy z wykazu mostów i obiektów inżynieryjnych ZDiUMu powinny trafić do zdium:name. Myślałem już nad użyciem tego tagu przy poprawie nazw m.in. starego mostu Pilczyckiego.
Enock4seth (2024-03-14 12:01:06+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping. I have reverted this changeset. If you are not sure about something, please don't add or move them. If you are still not sure what OpenStreetMap is about, here is a good start https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/
Enock4seth (2024-03-14 12:05:55+00:00): Hi,
I have reverted this changeset. Kindly avoid changing/moving/adding features if you are not sure about what you are doing.
MxxCon (2024-03-12 03:47:52+00:00): Hello.
Rather than completely delete closed biz, it's much better to use lifecycle tagging as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix or at the very least simply delete biz-specific tags but leave address info intact. Doing that not only preserves history of that object, which can be useful to refer to in the future, but also still allows this address to be searchable and be able to navigate to it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148407193
Frans S (2024-03-19 08:55:10+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings not squared.
Nodes of building connected to other features (road)
highway crosses over another highway.
As far I can see, you mapped many objects outside the project area. Please stay on the task you are mapping on.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148407419
Enock4seth (2024-03-14 11:50:19+00:00): Hi,
I have reverted this changeset, kindly don't add features you are not sure about, if you are still not sure what OpenStreetMap about, start from https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/
Enock4seth (2024-03-14 12:29:46+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping. I have reverted this changeset. If you are not sure about something, please don't add or move them. If you are still not sure what OpenStreetMap is about, here is a good start https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/
Enock4seth (2024-03-14 12:46:57+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping. I have reverted this changeset. If you are not sure about something, please don't add/change/move them. If you are still not sure what OpenStreetMap is about, here is a good start https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/
Enock4seth (2024-03-14 12:59:48+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping. I have reverted this changeset. If you are not sure about something, please don't add/change/move them. If you are still not sure what OpenStreetMap is about, here is a good start https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/
RedAuburn (2024-06-12 01:32:19+00:00): please be careful when converting to proposed, https://www.osm.org/way/1259278093 was marked as a proposed cycleway, when it's already a normal pavement
MacLondon (2024-06-13 15:19:31+00:00): It looks like you may have extended a couple of walking routes along https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/801938376 that presumably should not continue beyond the crossing on the main road.
RedAuburn (2024-06-13 17:37:16+00:00): ah damn you're right, fixed in https://www.osm.org/changeset/152643881
thanks 👍️
Sakari_N (2024-03-10 17:19:00+00:00): Hi, I reverted this because changing this road to highway=primary is not right. Please be careful when picking road types.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148472431
Baloo Uriza (2024-03-11 01:06:12+00:00): Probably mean to have building=yes and then use the address boxes
TaipanAl (2024-03-19 18:41:26+00:00): thanks
adiatmad (2024-03-14 06:26:34+00:00): Hi, I believe you meant to add the 'layer=' tag instead of 'level=' for the bridge.

(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1256857153)
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Alevel)
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge)
tekim (2024-03-11 18:15:24+00:00): Hello, thanks for the edits, however, we are not allowed to use Google images when editing OpenStreetMap due to Google's terms of service.
Adityo (2024-03-11 19:52:01+00:00): Hi. I am not using google for that. What I said is. If you want to know how the idp camp looks like. Go check google. Additionally as far as i am aware, what we are not allowed is to use the Google satellite background.
Enock4seth (2024-03-14 12:47:41+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping. I have reverted this changeset. If you are not sure about something, please don't add/change/move them. If you are still not sure what OpenStreetMap is about, here is a good start https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/
emersonveenstra (2024-03-09 13:42:26+00:00): Hello,

I've removed this building, the Art and Architecture building already exists here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1259292561#map=18/42.28944/-83.71761

Please do not draw over existing objects
SomeoneElse (2024-05-14 10:39:45+00:00): Hello,
You are tagfiddling again :)
Previously I used to separate out plaques from plates - you can see that at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#18/-25.00904/135.17758 .  Tag changes should be discussed in the forum, especially if there are data consumers who are going to be affected - something that you can see at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/memorial=plate#projects .
On an individual basis it's certainly possible to argue that "plaque" is the better tag - this one is https://www.iwm.org.uk/memorials/item/memorial/44738 , and I'd have mapped that as a plaque to start with, but mass changes should be discussed - something that you seem to have trouble doing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/geozeisig/blocks .
Best Regards,
Andy
geozeisig (2024-05-15 05:27:21+00:00): Hello,
I don't think I was cheating. There is currently no definition for plate on a wiki page. On the other hand, the memorial=plaque page states that it is an error. The large number also speaks in favour of this.
Best Regards,
Dieter
SomeoneElse (2024-05-15 20:15:12+00:00): The question you need to ask is, on a case by case basis, "is this a mistagging".  In the case of something like "highway=pirmary" you can be reasonably sure that it's just a misspelling.  In the case of a rare type of memorial you can't be sure unless you check other sources (like the IWM's picture, which I've now linked to the object)
Whether there's a wiki page is irrelevant.  
Also if a tag is used by data consumers it is only common courtesy to let them know.
geozeisig (2024-05-16 12:18:55+00:00): Oh, I have now seen a difference that could have led to the misunderstanding. It could have to do with vertical and horizontal. The description of memorial=plaque says that it should be placed vertically. That wasn't so decisive for me.
If this is important, we should discuss how to solve it.
Either we expand the definition of plaque or add a new tag.
(In German, plaque is only used in connection with the dentist)
SomeoneElse (2024-05-16 12:26:02+00:00): Just to add to the confusion, there's also "memorial:type"...
Enock4seth (2024-03-14 11:41:14+00:00): Hi,
I have reverted this changeset to enable full revert of earlier changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148401632

Thanks.