piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jbohmdk (2026-07-26 17:56:02+00:00): Hej, hvorfor bruger du luftfotos til at rode rundt med ladestandere i en kælder .  Jeg har gået rundt i denne offentlige parkeringskælder og noteret hvilke ladestandere der er og har forsøgt at indtegne dem på kortet, men har ikke nogen værktøjer til at opmåle eksakte GPS koordinater inde i store bygninger.

På level=-1 er der en række små ladestandere ved rækken af parkeringsbåse ud mod Herlev Hovedgade og nogle store ladestandere ved parkeringsbåse nær indgangen til centeret .  Disse ladestandere er ikke en samlet L-formet ladestation, da der er almindelige P-båse imellem de store og små ladestandere .

På level=1.5 og 2 (P1 og P2) er der små ladestandere langs muren ud mod parkeringsramperne .  Her har en anden drive-by mapper oprettet ekstra objekter med meningsløse changeset-tags .
LarsBG (2026-07-26 18:33:30+00:00): Jeg er ved at prøve lave lidt oprydning af løse man_made=charge_point  i Danmark som ifølge wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcharge_point og https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station bør være inde i en område. 

Og nu jeg er rund så har jeg fundet diverse "fejl" og lade stationer i den her bygning er ikke helt ok :-) 

og så har jeg idag lært at noget kan være mellem to etager level=1.5 ?!

Nu når du har været på stedet. Kan jeg logget dig til at rode lidt op i det + samle de man_made=charge_point på samme etage og firma i en amenity=charging_station.

På forhånd tak
eggie (2026-07-26 19:30:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Colbertson (2026-07-27 08:29:33+00:00): 3 more artworks?
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-27 14:10:21+00:00): Looks like you tagged the video detection camera the signal controller uses to see if there's vehicles waiting.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186409159
O'Pinyon (2026-07-27 14:18:59+00:00): No it is a ALPR camera just like the one on the other corner. It's in a heavily shaded area and black, same as the pole, about 8ft up on the main traffic pole.
Piskvor (2026-07-27 08:41:12+00:00): Fascinating and complex arrangement. Thank you for the clarification and detailed update. 

Do you know if the waterplay element is somehow connected downstream, or just left to dissipate?
Djer (2026-07-27 13:55:01+00:00): It is definitely connected somewhere, but not sure how. If it were connected to the pond inlet tunnel it would need to be longer and possibly gain elevation so that seems unlikely. If, however, it were connected to the outlet it wouldn't flow into the pond (which would conflict with info from [1]), unless there is a more complex arrangement there. On google streetview from 2012 a water tunnel of some kind can be seen exposed roughly where the waterplay is, which seems to lead to where the current pond outlet is. This exposed tunnel might either be a temporary structure or a bypass tunnel for excess water that isn't pumped into the waterplay (the existence of  which I've seen mentioned somewhere but don't really remember where rn). 

[1]: https://www.praha-priroda.cz/vodni-plochy-a-potoky/studanky-dle-katastru/hradcany/u-sanci/#:~:text=Do%20rybn%C3%ADka%20p%C5%99it%C3%A9k%C3%A1,do%20jeho%20obtoku.
Djer (2026-07-27 14:28:09+00:00): Actually, the tunnel visible on streetview is also visible on old mapy.cz aerial photos, and seems like it could go feed into the pond inlet. That could mean that this might indeed be the tunnel for excess water from the Blanka tunnel complex with the possibility to divert/pump water into the waterplay. There also seems to be another tunnel running parallel to this one ~10 meters to the north from it. Because this one was still being laid down when the aerial photos were taken it might be that it is just the permanent version that wasn't yet completed then.
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-27 14:08:12+00:00): This seems highly unlikely; this intersection does feature video traffic detection however; is it possible you're confusing the two kinds of cameras?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186410605
O'Pinyon (2026-07-27 14:23:40+00:00): These are separate from the traffic detection cameras. These point at rear ends of vehicles passing. They are a very recent addition.
Tomas Straupis (2026-07-26 17:25:34+00:00): Peržiūrėjau pakeitimą. Visų pirma nereikia skirtingų vietų pokyčius keisti vienu ypu, nes tada pokytis yra geografiškai labai didelis. Barjeras tarkim gerai (nes, tiesą sakant, nelabai kur tokie duomenys naudojami). O toliau tai nelabai gerai: pastatui sugrūsta į maisto tipo informaciją apie verslus, nėra tokio maisto „bebro blyninė“ ar „zuzu pica“, čia pavadinimai įmonių/verslų. Miško ribai kažkodėl uždėta medžių juostos žyma. Tai viską, išskyrus apsauginę tvorelę atstatysiu į pradinę būseną.
Tomas Straupis (2026-07-26 17:30:52+00:00): Nėra tokio verslo pavadinimo „kioskai“. Jei norisi detaliai surašyti, kokie dar šitoj veitoje yra kioskai, tai reikia dėti atskirus naujus taškus su žymomis shop=kiosk ar shop=fast_food, prie kiekvieno konkretų pavadinimą (name=...) ir tada cuisine=pica|kebab ir pan.
Seyruun (2026-07-26 17:26:39+00:00): Hello, welcome! Thanks for adding to Openstreetmap. Feel free to name some villages in this area if you have time and know them please! :)
It's very difficult to figure out for people not from the area.

Happy mapping!
Supaplex (2026-07-27 03:05:01+00:00): 重覆添加了，已經有了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1303042472
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186411315
eggie (2026-07-26 17:23:15+00:00): ... en dan kunnendie specifieke tags foot=no e.d gewoon weg.
Wildsharky (2026-07-29 06:58:09+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186497809
nevw (2026-07-30 22:14:25+00:00): Hi, most of these errors detected by osmi appear to belong to your changesets. If you are doing a lot of mapping it would be worthwhile checking for errors using osmi and identifying why and how to fix.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.25704&lat=-37.79186&zoom=13
uvok (2026-07-26 17:06:05+00:00): Grenze entlang der Straße -- hab ich jetzt mal "separat" hinzugefügt, string genommen verläuft er wohl direkt auf der landuse:commercial Grenze entlang, was aber später wahrscheinlich zu Schwierigkeiten führt?
Fraxi (2026-07-26 18:00:29+00:00): Дали /node/14051987230 и /node/12923695701 не са с един и същ собственик? Дали не става дума за една фирма и дублиране?
А името "Савич" съм го видял на витрина/надпис/табела и затова съм му задал това име (node/12739531742/) . Понеже пише "name:signed=no".

Ще се объркаш с тия сайтове...
По-добре(ако не ти е проблем) отбелязвай това, което виждаш на живо...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground
Fraxi (2026-07-26 18:02:37+00:00): Кой знае откога му е информацията в сайта... Работеше ли обекта като го видя днес? Можеш да се разходиш някой път до другия адрес, подаден в сайта и да видиш дали там функционира нещо(и какво) и да направиш съответните промени при нужда.
Dimitar155 (2026-07-26 19:27:35+00:00): Фирмата съществува на този адрес, но има разстояние между двете Д-та. Собствениците са различни.

@Fraxi, като линкваш към нещо пиши само node/123 или changeset/123 без други залепени символи, иначе не се превръща в линк.
Fraxi (2026-07-26 19:45:14+00:00): Да, забелязах, че не са се превърнали в линк. Пускам примерни линкове да видя дали има значение и втората наклонена черта, ще прощавате.
node/6872631381
node/6872631381/
Kaloan-koko (2026-07-26 20:44:28+00:00): Меджу другото до този обект има съседен на СИ, който явно е било първоналаното място на магазина, а след това се е преместил на текущото. Първоналачното как се бележи в този случай (този проблем има и с дюнерите Saha на пазара на Красно село и Борил на ул. Кюстендил 57).
Fraxi (2026-07-26 20:56:04+00:00): Точно така беше. Отбелязваш го като vacant и прехвърляш таговете върху новия обект. Обновяват се и се разменят таговете с текущите касаещи настоящите обекти.
Fraxi (2026-07-26 21:02:23+00:00): Отговорих ти там - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185804626#c1634300
AriAlvarez (2026-07-26 17:11:18+00:00): Added changes using osmnotes and mapillary
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-27 14:07:00+00:00): Do you have a picture of this camera?  I see this intersection has video traffic detection instead of ground induction loops (suggesting this signal's newer than about 2005 when video detection became cheaper than induction loops)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186413237
O'Pinyon (2026-07-27 14:22:21+00:00): These are separate from the traffic detection cameras. These point at rear ends of vehicles passing. They are a very recent addition.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-07-27 09:13:33+00:00): Erdemli'den Silifke'ye doğru devam eden otoyol henüz inşa halinde. Daha açılmamış yol kesimlerine göre yolların adını değiştirmenizin, "Adana-Silifke Otoyolu" diye adlandırmanızın doğru olmadığı kanaatindeyim.
NightH (2026-07-29 07:36:14+00:00): Kérlek fejezd be a kamu nevek felvitelét az OSM-re. Ez egy közösségi adatbázis, nem egy személyes játszótér. A korábbi szerkesztéseid mind visszavonásra kerültek, a továbbiakban kérlek tartózkodj az ilyen szerkesztésektől.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-07-27 09:18:44+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Name_is_the_name_only

Tünellerin adına "Tünel" diye yazmanız doğru değil. Tünellerin özel adı yoksa bir ad eklememelisiniz. tunnel=yes etiketi nesnenin tünel olduğunu veri tüketicilerine anlatmak için yeterli.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-26 19:20:41+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Business POIs added to the map must be visitable physical locations that are verifiable on the ground. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted re-adding SEO spam POI in a private residential dwelling, with no apparent verifiable location on the ground and spammy description=*, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186418948
Kovoschiz (2026-07-27 10:13:27+00:00): `highway=corridor` is not recommended. It's 10k fewer than `=footway` + `indoor=yes` , and ~80% have `indoor=yes` effectively duplicating. It doesn't work for `=steps` etc, and it causes patchy rendering with `=steps ` rendered as isolated sections.
Kovoschiz (2026-07-27 10:13:50+00:00): 2. You deleted `level=`
Kovoschiz (2026-07-27 10:14:09+00:00): 2. `level=` can co-exist with `layer=`
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-26 19:04:10+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for contributing!

Unfortunately, use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies, and may violate local law -- see https://osm.wiki/Google for more details.

Additionally, the name=* is inexplicably written in SHOUTY CASE, which is not appropriate for a name and a common spam tactic.

Therefore, I am required to revert your changes, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186418025

If you can independently verify some (or all) of this information with allowed sources that do not involved Google Maps (e.g. in person survey, the company's website, etc), then you may add that back, taking care to use correct tagging.

Happy mapping!
Martinligabue (2026-07-26 18:21:49+00:00): modifica annullata, 13/R è sbagliato per tre motivi diversi, l'indirizzo è già presente nel nodo corretto, importato, non ci va la barra e rosso si scrive rosso, non R
Comino (2026-07-26 19:56:30+00:00): Hi Martinligabue,

Can you explain to me why you use 

contact:street
contact:housenumber
contact:city
etc

instead of the standard 

addr:street
addr:housenumber
addr:city

tags?

As a BTC Map mapper, I make edits all over the world daily, but this is the first time someone does it this way.
Martinligabue (2026-07-26 20:00:50+00:00): having the address duplicated makes it harder to manage in italy, as we as france have a different way to mean the addresses. addr is used for the node, contact for just making it known what address it refers to, many galleries and food markets have a single addr, so it's clear where the address is, and dozen of contact, so to know where to enter. bremen schema is used in italy and in france for this reason, and helps in the management of complex cases, and avoids moving of addresses with the poi
Martinligabue (2026-07-26 20:02:27+00:00): ps: the bremen schema is supported by all updated map providers and shown as address. except for osmand, but that is in the works. or older map apps
b-jazz (2026-07-28 16:29:42+00:00): You have made a common error when you saw a fairway that looked like it didn't have a proper "Feature Type" defined and decided to add the fairway tag. The hole was already properly tagged, but was part of a relation of multiple objects known as a multipolygon. Please read this short wiki page where I've tried to explain what you are looking at and avoid making the mistake in the future. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID_understanding_golf_course_relations Thanks.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-26 19:20:26+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Business POIs added to the map must be visitable physical locations that are verifiable on the ground. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted re-adding SEO spam POI in a private residential dwelling, with no apparent verifiable location on the ground and spammy description=*, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186418948
FajrAl (2026-07-27 04:57:36+00:00): Tip: Pilih bangunan, dan tekan huruf Q untuk mengotakkan bangunan
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-26 19:20:14+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Business POIs added to the map must be visitable physical locations that are verifiable on the ground. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted re-adding SEO spam POI in a private residential dwelling, with no apparent verifiable location on the ground and spammy description=*, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186418948
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-26 19:19:46+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Business POIs added to the map must be visitable physical locations that are verifiable on the ground. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted re-adding SEO spam POI in a private residential dwelling, with no apparent verifiable location on the ground and spammy description=*, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186418948
bxl-forever (2026-07-26 19:56:43+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for this.  However, you added "description"="Closed for good"… but if this restaurant no longer exists it is more advised to remove the main tags. Otherwise, the restaurant will keep appearing in searches and on the map, and only people who care to read the description will find out there is no restaurant here at all.

I retagged it as a vacant place, it will no longer be visible now.
AureliePaillasse (2026-07-27 03:39:55+00:00): Thank you for the explanations. This restaurant no more opens after COVID. Web page no more exists too.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-26 19:19:38+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Business POIs added to the map must be visitable physical locations that are verifiable on the ground. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted re-adding SEO spam POI in a private residential dwelling, with no apparent verifiable location on the ground and spammy description=*, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186418948
bxl-forever (2026-07-28 20:29:55+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM.

The content of your change is okay, but it raised concerns here because naming an upload as "update" or "Corrected data" provides too little information to describe what you have modified.

For your future contributions, please make sure to always write a meaningful description.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks and keep up the good work.
VictorIE (2026-07-27 19:30:56+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177199500/

iD is saying:
"Warnings (1)
Residential Road: not:junction and junction have same value"

Existing tags:
junction=roundabout
lanes=1
not:junction=roundabout

My suggested tags:
lanes=2
not:junction=roundabout
width=7
b-unicycling (2026-07-29 21:48:33+00:00): That is indeed contradictory. I have deleted junction=roundabout, but I'm not convinced about the lanes=2, but maybe I'm not seeing something you see. Speed limit is also more likely 30, I would think.
Vladislav Grechannik (2026-07-26 21:30:43+00:00): I don't know where people got that Pečke -> Poljčane D1 info. I rode there some time ago and only signs that were there were for D8 as far as I remember
martianfreeloader (2026-07-26 22:05:33+00:00): Hm... I haven't verified it; just cleaned up the existing route. I'm happy with removing this section.

The currently mapped sections of D1 can be seen here: https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=14063970&type=relation&map=8.0/46.5583/14.5894
Vladislav Grechannik (2026-07-26 23:52:30+00:00): I'm pretty sure the entirety of `D1: Pečke -> Poljčane` can be reparented to D8 and be mostly correct if not entirely, because as far as I'm remember all the signs showed them being D8 and going to Poljčane (although closer to Poljčane signs stopped appearing so it might not go into the city itself). I might go on that ride again in the next 3 days, so I might return with more info
martianfreeloader (2026-07-27 07:34:38+00:00): Would be great if you could check on the ground!

I think if D1 is not marked in this section, then I would simply delete the "D1: Pečke -> Poljčane" (sub-)relation instead of reparenting it to a different superrelation. As D8 is already mapped, no data will be lost. What do you think?

Anyways, let's wait until you come back with ground information.
Vladislav Grechannik (2026-07-29 09:39:33+00:00): There's exactly one D1 mark and it's in Mostečno pointing to Poljčane then it continues in Zg. Poljčane
Vladislav Grechannik (2026-07-29 10:08:46+00:00): At least I assume those are for D1. That's the only place I've ever seen them. See https://api.panoramax.xyz/en/index?s=fp;s2;p29b171c5-8cd7-4b2c-9bd2-d5eeddeff2e9;c221.07/23.18/0;m21.2/46.2636519/15.4731387;vd;udefault for example
martianfreeloader (2026-07-30 17:42:26+00:00): OK, since D8 is well-signed in this section, is it ok for you if I just delete this D1 section?
Vladislav Grechannik (2026-07-31 04:45:17+00:00): uhh, in an ideal world we'd have the whole D1 route mapped, right? It certantly is somewhere there (even if poorly signed) and we have some reason to assume that it duplicates EV9's path (see https://pisrs.si/api/datoteke/integracije/351444707 where gov explicitly calls D1 as EV9). I think it's beneficial to future mappers to save the current D1 section for future correction when it gets more signage and it better reflects the real world sitation that the segment exists somewhere between Mostečno and Zg. Poljčane
martianfreeloader (2026-07-31 07:04:08+00:00): I think it depends on how much verifiability we demand. One could argue that if it is not signed then it doesn't exist. I think it's a grey area, I see arguments both for keeping and for deleting it.
So I'm fine with keeping it.
wolfy1339 (2026-07-26 20:54:21+00:00): Bonjour,
La license CC-BY 4.0 n'est pas compatible avec OSM
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/

Il faut demander la permission a la ville avant d'utiliser leurs jeux de données
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-27 13:55:45+00:00): These seem a tad on the massive side to be "bungalows".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186418928
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-27 13:57:28+00:00): Also please don't just uncritically import bing building footprints.  Use them as a starting point and double check that the footprint actually matches the building and adjust as necessary if it doesn't.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186418928
Udarian (2026-07-27 13:12:16+00:00): looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
YomanNH (2026-07-29 12:54:10+00:00): Z drogi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93153504 nie można wjechać rowerem na drogę https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1495403709?

Skąd na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1544896008 wzięło się bicycle=designated?
Adam Haba (2026-07-29 17:23:51+00:00): Już poprawiłem. Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi
Aralchiller (2026-07-26 19:40:33+00:00): additional source: https://www.nknews.org/pro/north-korea-building-first-new-large-prison-in-decades-in-sign-of-rising-crime/
user_5359 (2026-07-27 10:11:24+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244387217. What is the mean of the tag 
alt_namr = 南滘 Nam Kau ?
Please notice the difference to the value of alt_name = 南牛  !
chath_tsu (2026-07-26 19:44:52+00:00): updated highway features post construction, moved signals to incoming ways for complex intersections, connected cycleways to network
Frans S (2026-07-28 11:30:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A request.
A previous mapper connected paths on many occasions to landuse areas.
This is not correct.
The paths need to be connected to other paths (where in view) and not to the residential areas
When you come across these issues, please solve them,
Best regards
Frans S (2026-07-28 13:00:15+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A request.
A previous mapper connected paths on many occasions to landuse areas.
This is not correct.
The paths need to be connected to other paths (where in view) and not to the residential areas
When you come across these issues, please solve them,
Best regards
dzamper (2026-07-27 06:34:29+00:00): Chyba coś tu poszło nie tak, budynek został przekoszony i przestał mieć tagi budynku
VLZ27 (2026-07-27 15:07:03+00:00): Naprawiłem tagi. Chyba nie ma tagu na budynek uczelni, tylko na sam kampus.
PizzaTreeIsland (2026-07-26 20:20:43+00:00): Hello, 
Thank you for adding all those details. 

Please note that individual trees should only be mapped as single nodes. natural=tree on a way is not allowed. I fixed this 7 hours ago, sadly you deleted my correction and re-added a "wrong" tree, along with 16 others.
eggie (2026-07-27 06:56:11+00:00): Dag Rens,
Je weg liep dwars door de parkeervakken heen. Die heb ik aangepast en de verbinding naar het fietspad routeerbaar gemaakt voor fietsers. 
MVG
eggie
PizzaTreeIsland (2026-07-26 20:36:42+00:00): Hello, 
please note that trees are only supposed to be mapped as nodes in osm. Individual trees mapped as ways will not get rendered on the map and do not have a place in the data structure. Please do not trace any trees as areas in the future.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186422353
aceman444 (2026-07-26 20:34:30+00:00): Nitra, not Galanta :)
user_5359 (2026-07-27 10:53:09+00:00): Hello! Please have alook on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229588318, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448809140. What is the mean of the tag
Ref = Linha da Barra ? Did you mean ref ? But a name instead of a reference number?