piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-02-10 09:30:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13540196807 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Appliance repair shop"
---
Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего текста могла бы быть: "Мастерская по ремонту бытовой техники"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-19 05:34:22+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/178375654
NeisBot (2026-02-10 09:36:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13540219266 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Window tinting service"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-19 05:34:23+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178753797
(No visible changes after review)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 01:55:56+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, in changeset 184205309

https://osm.org/changeset/184205309
Znaika (2026-02-10 16:28:02+00:00): source? see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121154489
5R-MFT (2026-02-10 16:38:32+00:00): Örtliche Tageszeitung. Da kommt ein neuer Kebab rein oder ist mittlerweile schon drin. Tageszeitung muss ich nochmal suchen.
5R-MFT (2026-02-10 16:39:27+00:00): Way passt auch nicht da oben Wohnungen sind.
Znaika (2026-02-10 16:43:30+00:00): Mit dem Gebäude stimmt es. Laden war / ist nur im EG. Vor eine Woche war ich dort.  Da stand "echte Berliner" an den Fensterscheiben. Und die waren noch zugeklebt. Davor war dort  kurz ein Imbiss, und noch davor ein Metzger, kein Bäcker
Znaika (2026-02-10 16:47:36+00:00): Hey, du hast recht https://www.instagram.com/reel/DTR8Z5HDJV9/
Znaika (2026-02-10 16:48:24+00:00): Bärliner statt Berliner aber :-)
5R-MFT (2026-02-10 17:01:53+00:00): Stimmt in der Nachricht stand echter Baerliner. Und weil ich das unklar fand hatte ich es erstmal weggelassen. Kannst aber nachtragen da ich zur Zeit nur Handy habe.
NeisBot (2026-02-10 09:54:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13540261096 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Engineering office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-19 05:34:25+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178753798
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
Comino (2026-02-11 08:52:54+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes".

The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NOT accepted.
Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Cryptocurrencies_with_payment_tag and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:*#Cryptocurrencies

Please REMOVE the payment:cryptocurrencies=yes !

Thank you.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
NeisBot (2026-02-10 10:06:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13540238171 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Engineering office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-19 05:34:28+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178753800
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-13 00:13:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1476112049

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2026-02-10 10:06:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13540263514 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tattoo shop"
---
Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего текста могла бы быть: "Салон татуировок"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-19 05:34:30+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178753801
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
Udarian (2026-02-10 19:10:28+00:00): can you please double check whether or not the maxweight applies to the non bridge sections of road like way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1368282776

Happy Mapping,
Udar.
TinPetreković (2026-02-11 10:16:57+00:00): Hi Udar, thank you for your comment. After reviewing the changeset we completely agree with your observation, the weight restriction tags are not needed on non-bridge sections. We have removed the tags from all sections but the bridge itself in changeset openstreetmap.org/changeset/178398746 and believe the problem is resolved. Thank you again for pointing out our mistake. #OptimoRoute
Sammyhawkrad (2026-02-10 11:30:14+00:00): Hi St_Boniface, welcome to OSM and thanks for the contributions so far. 

A few things you need to know:
- to add a village/town, add a node at the centre of it and tag it with place=village + name=* instead of adding it to the land use polygon.
- don't add new roads where they are already mapped. Modify the existing ones instead
- use leisure=pitch + sport=soccer to add football parks. leisure=park is something different.
- don't ignore warnings that show up while saving/uploading your changes.
Ltrlg (2026-02-11 08:39:35+00:00): Même remarque que pour changeset/178314752 : way/1278059884 n’a aucune raison d’exister si ce n’est comme accès à way/618337586.
VJMK (2026-02-10 18:48:31+00:00): Z informacji,że w tym miejscu jest skup złomu trudno będzie komukolwiek skorzystać, jeśli nie wiadomo jakie są godziny otwarcia, ani też dodzwonić się bez jakichkolwiek danych kontaktowych. O braku operatora nie wspominam.
VJMK (2026-02-10 18:49:58+00:00): @andrzej-pl Czy jesteś pewien, że ten skup nadal działa?
VJMK (2026-02-10 21:02:45+00:00): @andrzej-pl I z jakich źródeł korzystałeś, by stwierdzić że ten skup istnieje i nadal działa? Wg CEIDG działalność gospodarcza pod adresem Chłodna 54 została zawieszona z początkiem tego roku https://aplikacja.ceidg.gov.pl/CEIDG/CEIDG.Public.UI/SearchDetails.aspx?Id=ef0e7f9e-a582-45cb-ad92-19e29f52c116
andrzej-pl (2026-02-11 06:30:54+00:00): Korzystałem z danych, hmmm... jak to nazwać... osobistych? Ten skup działa, przy ul. Granicznej jest zawieszony szyld z podanym nr telefonu i niedawno korzystałem z jego usług. Widocznie właścicielka posiada kilka firm... Nie wiem, jakie są godziny otwarcia. Nie wiem także, o jakiego operatora chodzi? Operatora zgniatarki puszek? Czy może adres huty, do której złom jedzie? Usunąłem z opisem XD, bo większego pieniactwa dawno nie widziałem. Dodaję informacje w dobrej wierze, a jeśli widzę, że dana rzecz ma braki, to je dodaję, a nie rzucam się jak pchła na psie.
VJMK (2026-02-11 12:40:41+00:00): Operatorem w tym kontekście będzie przedsiębiorca prowadzący ten skup złomu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:operator

Jeśli tam byłeś i korzystałeś z usług, to jako źródło powinna być wskazana wizyta w terenie. 

@Usunąłem z opisem XD

No i z punktu widzenia wytycznych, to źle. Możliwe, że szyld nadal tam wisi, więc może być nadal rozpoznawalny w terenie jako skup. Mając info z CEIDG o zawieszeniu działalności, powinieneś dać odpowiedni prefiks cyklu życia lub chociaż fixme z notatką, że trzeba sprawdzić czy nadal działa.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-11 21:27:30+00:00): > Z informacji,że w tym miejscu jest skup złomu trudno będzie komukolwiek skorzystać, jeśli nie wiadomo jakie są godziny otwarcia, ani też dodzwonić się bez jakichkolwiek danych kontaktowych. O braku operatora nie wspominam.

nie ma obowiązku dodawania tych informacji, samo dodanie tylko informacji że sklep jakiś jest to już krok do przodu co resztę czyni łatwiejszym

nie ma sensu czepiać się że ktoś dodał sklep bez godzin otwarcia
VJMK (2026-02-11 21:38:34+00:00): Ok, tego się nie czepiam. Brak podania źródła jednak problem robi.
eggie (2026-02-10 11:35:40+00:00): Dag SP Dat zij eigenlijk geen parkeerterreinen.
Ik heb het aangepast naar street_side

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side

MP verwijderd
MVG
eggie
SP26 (2026-02-10 11:47:48+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

Super, dankje. Goed om te weten.

Grt,
SP
SP26 (2026-02-10 11:51:12+00:00): Heb bij andere wijzigingen volgensmij dezelfde fout gemaakt, ik zal ze nog eens langslopen en aanpassen
eggie (2026-02-10 11:52:23+00:00): Het voorkomt dat je een wijk vol met grote P's krijgt. Deze P's renderen minder promnent.
Paar keer CTRL-F5 .. dan zie je het effect.
SP26 (2026-02-10 12:04:45+00:00): Top, heb het in de vorige changesets ook aangepast, dank voor de tip en hulp!
Norbert Dichter (2026-02-10 19:41:56+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178351554
Dodko (2026-02-13 14:09:07+00:00): Prečo si presunul aj adresu , veď bola dobre
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mapka/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/ra_adresne_body/0/13827280?pos=48.130227,17.112703,18
Sanniu (2026-02-11 06:50:26+00:00): Hi, there is a global recommendation not to name roundabouts with street name, only name it if it has separate name.
Nothing wrong with naming this one, but on complex intersections that can be controversial.
Sanniu (2026-02-11 06:50:35+00:00): Hi, there is a global recommendation not to name roundabouts with street name, only name it if it has separate name.
Nothing wrong with naming this one, but on complex intersections that can be controversial.
NeisBot (2026-02-10 10:36:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1476121512 v1 | 12 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178351957
NeisReview (2026-02-19 05:34:49+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178354359
Adventurize (2026-02-27 10:12:46+00:00): 不要“Tagging for the renderer”，看：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
NeisBot (2026-02-10 10:42:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13540349110 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tax office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-19 05:34:30+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178753803
(Restore previous tags)
NeisBot (2026-02-10 10:42:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12419158711 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Sauna manufacturer"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-19 05:34:30+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178383711
dgmapping (2026-02-10 18:28:33+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!
For street names in Estonia, we exclude tänav or tn. See wiki for details: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Et:Key:addr:*
Iceing (2026-02-10 19:05:34+00:00): Thanks!
NeisBot (2026-02-10 10:57:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1476128684 v1 | 7 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178353004
NeisReview (2026-02-19 05:34:49+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178353501
Ltrlg (2026-02-11 08:41:45+00:00): Même remarque que pour changeset/178314752 : way/993410091 n’a aucune raison d’exister si ce n’est comme accès à way/359127728.
simon_geovelo (2026-02-11 09:12:21+00:00): je n'ai pas osé le supprimer complètement pour ne pas trop détruire le travail des autres contributeur, mais je suis d'accord avec toi, il n'a pas vraiment raison d’exister
NeisBot (2026-02-10 11:16:33+00:00): 🌍 OSM에 오신 것을 환영합니다, 올리버.
기여해 주셔서 감사합니다!

협력을 더 쉽게 하기 위해 다른 사람들이 당신의 편집을 이해하도록 도와주려면, 당신이 한 변경 사항에 대한 짧은 설명을 추가하는 것이 좋습니다. 분명한 댓글은 커뮤니티가 당신의 작업을 따라가고 더 나은 피드백을 제공하는 데 도움이 됩니다. 좋은 댓글 작성 방법에 대한 팁은 여기[1]에서 찾을 수 있습니다.

✅ 여기에 지도 편집 내용을 기반으로 한 샘플 댓글이 있습니다: "건물, 주차장, 휴식 공간, 서비스 도로, 주거 도로, 숲, 그리고 헬리패드 추가"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, 올리버.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added buildings, parking, leisure areas, service ways, residential roads, woodland, and a helipad"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
habi (2026-02-10 11:09:56+00:00): https://qa.poole.ch/addresses/GWR/355_all.osm.zip
FajrAl (2026-02-10 11:11:41+00:00): 178224101,178224077,178224039,178223966,178223883,178223839,178223817,178223521
Fraxi (2026-02-24 15:40:08+00:00): Променям https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1476144687 от =yes на =construction, защото не се вижда от спътниковите снимки да има сграда там.
Rainero (2026-03-16 11:45:06+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179947059
(unzulässige Quelle)
faraz_munj (2026-06-27 05:41:41+00:00): Please review this edit, wrong tag is used for a building that is a detached or  semi-detached home.
nevw (2026-02-25 01:52:25+00:00): Lake Tobin is mapped as a multipolygon with all it's tags ...
intermittent=yes
natural=water
salt=yes
tidal=no
water=lake
You should not duplicate these tags on all the outers that form the relation. Those individual ways generally should have no tags.
mueschel (2026-02-15 11:18:10+00:00): Hi,
what does "stop_point" mean? This tag isn't used in any other place. I suspect 'ref' or some 'ref:XYZ' would be appropriate.
Comino (2026-02-11 08:53:40+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes".

The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NOT accepted.
Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Cryptocurrencies_with_payment_tag and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:*#Cryptocurrencies

Please REMOVE the payment:cryptocurrencies=yes !

Thank you.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
nevw (2026-02-11 11:21:13+00:00): Tks, deleted now
czebureks (2026-04-09 11:02:04+00:00): Cześć,
dzięki za aktualizacje na terenie Elbląga. Wiesz może, co tu się dzieje teraz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1389545351 ? Parking jest w tej chwili w budowie, czy też już gotowy?
eggie (2026-02-10 12:20:06+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. 
De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-10 12:10:10+00:00): 👍
rarad74 (2026-02-10 13:01:38+00:00): Salut. Si pana la urma sensul de mers e invers sensului normal in giratorii sau ronduri? Ca acum o parte din sensul de circulatie in acel rond e inversat. S e bat cap in cap...
Fraxi (2026-02-10 14:00:54+00:00): Всъщност Nphone предлагат предимно сервиз на телефони
https://www.gsmservice.bg/%D1%83%D1%81%D0%BB%D1%83%D0%B3%D0%B8
Fraxi (2026-02-10 14:02:18+00:00): Има и аксесоари, но основното е ремонт.
Dimitar155 (2026-02-10 20:02:01+00:00): Възможно е, взимал съм само аксесоари от там. Но не съм видял да продават телефони, поради което смених тага. Ако прецениш можеш да го промениш.
rhhs (2026-02-10 18:41:57+00:00): Hi, thanks for editing the map of Sofia. However I reverted your edit because there is consensus in the Bulgarian OSM community to not include улица (street) in street names. See here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bg:WikiProject_Bulgaria#%D0%98%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B8_%D0%B8_%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B4%D0%B8
KarooDesert (2026-02-11 19:57:00+00:00): Hello rhhs,
Thank you for the clarification about not adding the word of “улица” in street names in Bulgaria. I will follow the established naming conventions going forward. Have a great day!
bxl-forever (2026-02-10 13:05:26+00:00): Bonjour,

Est-ce que c’est une interdiction *légale* ou est-ce simplement déconseillé ?

Je ne trouve aucun panneau qui interdit à un cycliste de prendre la voie rapide à Wahis ou Léopold III. Ce n'est pas une bonne idée, mais c'est légal.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1551614992796912

C'est important parce qu'un cycliste a le droit de quitter une piste cyclable pour changer de direction à un carrefour, et on doit toujours réfléchir à ce point de navigation avant d'ajouter bicycle=no sur des rues.

Des panneaux auraient-ils été installés ici récemment ?  Où peut-on trouver l'info ?
Yannick Lambin (2026-02-10 13:11:42+00:00): Bonjour

Non, aucun panneau installé à proximité, mais cette section est la seule de tout le boulevard à être "vélo autorisé".  Ce n'est dès lors peut-être pas pertinent de modifier.
arjunaraoc (2026-02-16 12:15:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178627365#map=18/14.456314/79.991739
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178358782
Fraxi (2026-02-11 11:41:37+00:00): Моля, добави и тези.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13334674739
Dimitar155 (2026-02-11 15:44:26+00:00): Готово. Скрипта ги минава така или иначе. Стига да има оператор, който да познава.
Fraxi (2026-02-11 19:40:27+00:00): Мерси! Ако искаш, мини и тези от https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178418331. За да не бъдат пропуснати.
Dimitar155 (2026-02-12 17:15:48+00:00): Няма как да бъдат пропуснати. Скрипта който съм си направил гледа всички контейнери за рециклиране в цялата страна.
eggie (2026-02-10 13:20:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Dit is niet zo duidelijk wat je hier mee wil?
Een barrier=yes zegt niet zoveel Wat is het. Op elke hoek heb je nogmaals barrier=yes gezet. War zijn dat dan?
Wat heeft het met een verkeersmaatregel van doen?
Wanneer het iets tijdelijks is kun je het beter verwijderen. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-10 14:25:31+00:00): Op de laatste satfoto van jauari zie ik wel iets van een afrastering. Dan is de tag barrier=fence...  Maar als dit kortdurend is kun je het beter verwijderen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-10 14:26:16+00:00): https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@50.84987,5.704722,20/?datastrip=20260104_SVNEO-01
Warin61 (2026-02-12 04:27:43+00:00): Hi
Relation 20197234 pedestrian way has an error 
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.19183&lat=-33.87358&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
❤️‍🔥 (2026-02-17 08:39:27+00:00): sorry, this one is fixed as well. we've got a code fix ready in iD to prevent this from happening, but it will likely be a few more months before it's released: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/pull/11734#pullrequestreview-3630412351