piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Joseph R P (2023-11-29 00:01:14+00:00): A road number shouldn't really dictate how a road is classified unless it's something like a US Route or Interstate (but even those are debatable in some cases). Virginia is a great example of this as there are some secondary/unsigned highways tagged as trunk because they serve to connect other major highways or cities, such as Parham Road, Nimmo Parkway, and Liberia Avenue and vice versa with primary state highways being simple driveways to state buildings.

As for the road itself, regardless of its route designation, it makes sense to have Liberia as a trunk road because it's what you need to use if you're coming from somewhere along or north of the 28 corridor down to SE PWC or vice versa, and it provides a direct connection between two major trunk routes. I myself have used it for getting from Harrisburg, PA or Frederick, MD down to where I live.
redd (2023-11-26 21:00:48+00:00): danke!
MxxCon (2023-11-26 04:03:13+00:00): Hello.
Perhaps instead of park it's better to tag it as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dflowerbed ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144459116
IraGersh (2023-11-26 12:33:01+00:00): Yes.  Going with flowerbed for both gardens I defined.
IraGersh (2023-11-26 12:37:19+00:00): While said I prefer flowerbed, I don't know how to define it that way. Also the name 104 Panel Garden is certainly not official.  It is considered a panel garden and it happens to be at 104.  If I say it that way everyone will know what I'm talking about.
MxxCon (2023-11-26 14:19:05+00:00): By "everyone" perhaps you mean locals to the neighborhood, because if you were to say that to me I'd have no idea what you are talking about. Take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Local_names_(loc_name)

Another note, when mapping features that supposed to be rectangular, you can right-click on them and select "Make Square" (shortcut key Q) to make its corner have perfect right angles. That makes your mapping look neater and closer to the real world shape.
Similar for round features, you can draw them very roughly with just 4 nodes placed around the perimeter, right-click and select Make Circle.
MxxCon (2023-11-26 04:04:54+00:00): Hello.
"North bus stop garden" sounds like a name you came up with. Please don't invent names for features. It's perfectly fine for features not to have names. Perhaps it is more suitable to add that information into description= tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144459164
MxxCon (2023-11-26 04:07:47+00:00): Please note that this is incorrect way to tag parking and driving lanes. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking for information on how to tag such features.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144459225
MxxCon (2023-11-26 04:08:11+00:00): Similar to the previous edit, that this is an incorrect way to tag parking and driving lanes. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking for information on how to tag such features.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144459240
MxxCon (2023-11-26 04:11:11+00:00): Hello.
What are you trying to map here?
Also please note that all these tags are invalid and must be corrected:
bicycle access=yes
car access=no
embankment=yes
foot access=yes
foot access=yes
Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access for the correct use of access tags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144459502
MxxCon (2023-11-26 04:12:40+00:00): Please note that crosswalks and sidewalks do NOT get names of their streets. They are unnamed features.(except for very few exceptions)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144459546
Koreller (2025-07-11 14:03:45+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution in Turkmenistan !
How do you know that this building is number 541 on its street?
MxxCon (2023-11-26 04:15:58+00:00): Hello.
Please note that "crosses=Riverside Drive" is invalid tag. We do not tag what street a crosswalk crosses. It is inferred by the map itself by the fact that crosswalk intersects Riverside Drive streets.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144459720
exarkun (2023-11-26 13:00:34+00:00): Hi BenuelDSVG,
laut Website von Gleisplanweb https://www.gleisplanweb.eu/impressum.php

Urheberrecht
Die Betreiber der Seiten sind bemüht, stets die Urheberrechte anderer zu beachten bzw. auf selbst erstellte sowie lizenzfreie Werke zurückzugreifen.

Die durch die Seitenbetreiber erstellten Inhalte und Werke auf diesen Seiten unterliegen dem deutschen Urheberrecht. Beiträge Dritter sind als solche gekennzeichnet. Die Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und jede Art der Verwertung außerhalb der Grenzen des Urheberrechtes bedürfen der schriftlichen Zustimmung des jeweiligen Autors bzw. Erstellers. Downloads und Kopien dieser Seite sind nur für den privaten, nicht kommerziellen Gebrauch gestattet.

Hast Du diese Zustimmung ? Dann bitte im OpenStreetMap-wiki hinterlegen. Danke.

Falls nicht, Änderungen bitte rückgängig machen. Siehe hierzu auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Legal_FAQ
BenuelDSVG (2023-11-26 13:54:31+00:00): @exarkun was du da schreibst ist Müll erstmal war ich selber schon Chorweiler und weis wie es da aussieht was du hier schreibst ist absolut falsch ich bitte dich dies zu unterlassen
Nakaner (2024-05-03 09:21:03+00:00): Ich habe soeben alle Änderungen dieses Benutzers, bei denen es um geplante Vorhaben geht und aufgrund fehlender Freigabe der verwendeten Quellen, rückgängig gemacht. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15681
ManuelB701 (2023-11-26 06:36:02+00:00): Ja... nicht ganz, da habe ich den gleichen Fehler gemacht, als ich bei Darmstadt, Mainz und Wiesbaden die Parking-Tags erneuert habe.
Die Idee ist, dass bei "parking:lane:*" zuerst die Orientierung und dann die Art des Parkplatzes angegeben wird, bei "parking:*" allerdings zuerst die Art und dann die Orientierung d.h. einfach das ":lane" zu entfernen ist nicht korrekt.
Wetterauer (2023-11-26 07:31:09+00:00): Moin Manuel,
Deinen Kommentar vestehe ich nicht. 
Das Wiki ist hier doch eindeutig:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Parking
ManuelB701 (2023-11-26 13:42:58+00:00): Eigentlich ist es Street Parking, was hier wichtig ist: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking

Jedenfalls, was ich meine ist, dass im alten "parking:lanes:*"-Tagging zuerst die Orientierung angegeben wird wie z.B. "parking:lanes:both=parallel" und dann mit der Orientierung die Art des Parkens wie z.B. "parking:lanes:both:parallel=on_street". Beim neuen "parking:*" aber ist "parking:both=parallel" ungültig, ebenso existiert "parking:both:parallel" nicht. Stattdessen verwendet man "parking:both" für den Typ (z.B.  "parking:both=on_street") und für die Orientierung dann "parking:both:orientation".
Wetterauer (2023-11-26 15:19:53+00:00): jetzt habe ich es wohl begriffen. Aus parking:lane:both muss für ein Parken an beiden Straßenränder parking:both:lane werden. Und *lane* wird nur für „Straßenrand“ benutzt. 
Richtig?
ManuelB701 (2023-11-26 15:29:49+00:00): Eigentlich gilt "parking:lane:*" als veraltet und sollte nicht verwendet werden. Was ich eigentlich meinte ist, dass der Syntax zwischen dem alten und neuen Format unterschiedlich ist und das reine Entfernen von ":lane" von "parking:lane:*" meistens nicht ausreicht (die einzige Ausnahme ist, wenn kein Parken existiert, da sind beide Formate gleich).
calli3756 (2023-11-26 08:50:19+00:00): Danke für die guten Beiträge!
BenuelDSVG (2023-11-26 13:52:46+00:00): Bitte ich versuche mein bestes alles geplante etc. aktuell zu halten^^
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-27 02:23:32+00:00): Other CS redacted by error when personal info was removed
pza (2023-11-27 12:41:23+00:00): I don't really agree with this change. These are links between the M8 and Iron Cove Link. It might not be obvious now, but will be when the rest of the M8 (Western Harbour Tunnel) is built. It is also pretty clear when you drive it, where there is a single lane merges on/off the Iron Cove Link Tunnel. If anything I would think it should be Iron Cove Link which is upgraded from motorway_link to motorway.
pza (2023-11-27 22:25:28+00:00): I just did the lane info for Rozelle Interchange, and this section is the _only_ link of the entire project that is a single lane, so it is certainly wrong for it to be a motorway.  I'll revert this change.
arjunaraoc (2024-01-02 08:58:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144461037
Hungerburg (2023-11-27 12:29:10+00:00): Hallo Wegi, dort wo du die Breite vom Pfad gesetzt hast, ist da nicht neu gebaut worden?
Wegi1707 (2023-11-27 15:27:55+00:00): ja, visavis von Berglweg 3a (auf der nördlichen Strassenseite) wurde ein großer Block gebaut, der Weg, der dort eingezeichnet ist, ist derzeit noch nicht begeh(fahr)bar, wird aber nach Abschluss der Bauarbeiten wieder hergerichtet...
Hungerburg (2023-12-02 01:32:15+00:00): Hallo Wegi, ich bin schon länger dabei, also zuerst: Willkommen zu openstreetmap!

Eine kleine Rüge: Bitte beim Absenden eines Eintrags im Feld "Änderungssatz-Kommentar" etwas hinschreiben, das sich speziell auf die Änderung bezieht. In dem Fall ist das eh passiert, zumindest teils, aber in andren Fällen nicht.

Openstreetmap lebt von Einträgen Ortsansässiger, das kann aber auch als Quelle "Erhebung vor Ort" mitgeteilt werden. Der Kommentar ist mehr eine Mitteilung an andre Leute die dieselbe die Gegend bearbeiten.

Dass der Weg momentan nicht oder nur erschwert passierbar ist, da bin ich bei Dir, openstreetmap ist kein Verkehrszustandsbericht; Den Weg wirds noch länger geben als die Baustelle ;)
algot (2024-02-09 03:52:21+00:00): А звідки у вас інформація, що ця вулиця має назву "Героїв України", а не Паркова?
gscholz (2023-12-01 08:13:33+00:00): Hi  zstadler,
this changset has created errors in tha OSM databaser regarding self intersecting and overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=34.95134&lat=32.54640&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144462835

Especially way 151052571 is affected by the overlapping path:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151052571#map=17/32.54411/34.94867

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
zstadler (2023-12-02 17:35:09+00:00): I hope https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144698920 fixed things
HikeAndMap (2023-11-26 19:29:41+00:00): Hi can you tell me why you changed this from "no" to "limited" ? 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wheelchair

The step into PUJ here is definitely >7cm, more like 20-30cm or more.

And putting a wheelchair into the Jeeps.. I think you'll find out it's going to be impossible even if you get assistance from 2 or 3 adult male.

Thanks for looking into this
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144462847
wheelmap_visitor (2024-06-04 10:10:11+00:00): You are right! Changed the value to "no". Thanks for reporting this!
HikeAndMap (2023-11-26 19:29:31+00:00): Hi can you tell me why you changed this from "no" to "limited" ? 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wheelchair

The step into PUJ here is definitely >7cm, more like 20-30cm or more.

And putting a wheelchair into the Jeeps.. I think you'll find out it's going to be impossible even if you get assistance from 2 or 3 adult male.

Thanks for looking into this
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144462852
Helge_Inselmann (2023-11-30 16:32:33+00:00): Hi this Helge from the Wheelmap.org Team. The Wheelmap_visitor is a collective account for changes done via Wheelmap.org. So I cant tell you the reason of our user. However, I think that your judgement is correct and changend it back to "no". 
Best, 
Helge
DaveF (2025-04-08 16:36:57+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1226899352
The telegraph are claiming Gorsey Lane is now fully a one way street.
https://cf-particle-html.eip.telegraph.co.uk/87155ceb-34a1-4094-b823-580456796af3.html?direct=true&id=87155ceb-34a1-4094-b823-580456796af3&template=cls

Would you have on ground knowledge to confirm?

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/04/06/vicar-blames-awkward-cycle-lane-for-worshipper-exodus/
TomJeffs (2025-04-08 16:44:38+00:00): They don't know what they're talking about, only the junction is one-way for driving.  The remainder is two-way.
DaveF (2025-04-08 17:39:30+00:00): As I thought.
Is there any segregated/marked cycle lane in Gorsey road?
TomJeffs (2025-04-08 17:46:41+00:00): Only at the junction, you can see a bit on streetview - https://maps.app.goo.gl/KdgnBGSAr8VkHARt8  To be honest I don't think legally it's even a oneway road there, it's just a no entry at the junction.

I could go into the politics but it's basically Nathan Evans (Tory cllr) using this as a divisive local issue.  The whole thing is absolute bullshit, the crossing was petitioned for by a local schoolgirl.  The council just decided to add a cycle route to it.  The vicar is an idiot.
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-09 07:09:40+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143575936
user_5359 (2023-11-28 08:25:58+00:00): Hello, please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/11377293286, http://www.osm.org/node/11377293285, 
http://www.osm.org/node/11377293284. what is the mean of the tag ower = minor_line? The tag power = minor_line is for a way, not for a node.
DeFra85 (2023-11-28 21:40:58+00:00): Hej hej, dieses Changeset würde ich an deiner Stelle revertieren. Schließlich löschen wir keine Wege. Ich hätte diesen stattdessen auf abandoned:highway= gesetzt
eggie (2023-11-26 09:27:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
aTarom (2023-11-26 15:08:25+00:00): hola, gracias por editar, se ha movido un
natural=saddle
pero no se ha actualizado su elevación
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8680232487/history
te lo comento por si ha sido accidental el desplazamiento o hay que actualizar el valor de ele?
Saludos
maragath (2023-11-27 09:22:46+00:00): Hola, efectivamente ha sido accidental, ya lo he vuelto a poner en su sitio
Henrik PS (2023-11-28 18:52:57+00:00): Jeg har været inde og lægge nye adgangsveje og p-område ved  Kirkebjerg Parkvej 6 baseret på lokal viden. Jeg forstår ikke hvorfor de blot bliver slettet
osmviborg (2023-11-28 21:33:01+00:00): Tilbageført, check lige. Er Elektronikvej åben ud mod Kirkebjerg Parkvej, pt. er access=no ?
GOD84 (2023-11-26 16:07:57+00:00): Qajar and royal family British
Vojta Vilímec (2024-02-10 15:53:17+00:00): Linka 164 již nejezdí na Sobín a místo ní jsou zřízeny linky 214 a 279, mohu poprosit o úpravu?
LockOnGuy (2023-11-28 01:41:20+00:00): Why did you delete name:ar here?            
way 198198422        
way 824510514
ڕاستی (2023-11-29 21:06:19+00:00): Look at the source.
LockOnGuy (2023-11-29 21:09:45+00:00): May you answer the question please?     
The source you provided here doesn’t justify the removal of name:ar.   
Regards.
ڕاستی (2023-11-29 21:52:19+00:00): The source is clear and shows just Kurdish and English language.
If their is an Arabic language prove me wrong.
Then you provide a source that shows that their an Arabic for the road (other roads you adding Arabic names for them).
LockOnGuy (2023-11-29 21:55:12+00:00): So you removed name:ar without surveying the location and only relied on a one far mapillary picture?       
If so, that is not acceptable, and such edits of yours shall be stopped and reverted.
ڕاستی (2023-11-30 13:56:13+00:00): So you surveyed the location then added Arabic name?
LockOnGuy (2023-11-30 16:50:42+00:00): You did not answer the question, you removed name:ar without surveying the location and only relied on one far mapillary picture?       
Please answer this exact question and do not ignore answering.          
          
You have been doing such edits for years removing valid names even from place=* nodes just because you don't like the specific language even though it's the official language of the country and an official language by law in Erbil and the Kurdistan region in Iraq.       
You did the same type of edits days ago when you removed the Arabic name of Barzani Nemir Street while the name you removed is registered in the Erbil Municipality, the official government interties, and can be verified on the ground, example this Arabic receipt of a store in the street has the Arabic name written as the name you removed https://i.ibb.co/ZhksHCT/image.png        
Please stop and refrain from such problematic edits.              
Regards.
ڕاستی (2023-12-02 12:51:42+00:00): 100% Survey and with mapillary source.

Do you even look at what you show as a source?  Is that a joke?
Since when we ignore the official signs and government sources and rely on a bill? 
And for what? For the street names wow.
LockOnGuy (2023-12-02 13:09:17+00:00): Survey doesn’t mean eye survey only, it could be asking the people for details and names on the ground.       
If the locals and the people at the location can speak a specific language and gave you a name in that language, of the street for example, this name can be added to OSM.         
Same example can be done on other examples like opening hours for a park for example, as sometimes there is no signs, but you can confirm and verify it by visiting on those hours, and this can also be done for the street name, you can go and ask someone in Arabic like “hello is this example street?” If he replies in Arabic with “yes correct, this is the example street” then this info is verified on the ground.       
Regards.
rempshaener (2023-11-26 10:04:23+00:00): Hallo,
zu diesem Änderungssatz habe ich Anmerkungen.
Der Abschnitt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1021362388 sollte aus meiner Sicht kein Tertiary sein, wenn direkt danach residential folgt (ohne Wendemöglichkeit). Dann sollte direkt ab Kreisverkehr residential gelten. Sonst wäre https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1209825456 auch nicht schlüssig.
Die Erfassung von https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/920254264 hätte ich aus Gründen der Stigmatisierung gerne vermieden.
Bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/678925244 habe ich deine Änderungen bereits rückgängig gemacht - sorry. Es handelt sich nicht um wetland sondern um ein Regenrückhaltebecken, dass an 350 Tagen im Jahr staubtrocken ist. Streng genommen ist bereits der ständig geflutete Bereich Bestandteil der Fläche, das meckern nur alle QS-Tools an.
Viele Grüße
Lejun (2024-01-17 18:59:39+00:00): Fichtre j'ai été doublé sur cette information que je viens seulement de recevoir !

Merci et bravo pour ta première (J'espère pas la dernière) contribution !
Branko Kokanovic (2023-11-26 10:21:22+00:00): Nova tabla: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%A2%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0_%D1%81%D0%B0_%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC_%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B5_%D0%91%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0_%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%85%D0%B0%D1%98%D0%BB%D0%B0_%D0%9F%D1%83%D0%BF%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_(%D0%9D%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8_%D0%91%D0%B5%D0%BE%D0%B3%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B4).jpg
Friendly_Ghost (2023-11-26 15:19:37+00:00): Hi. Do this name & tourism tag meet the ground truth principle?
Ombrefeu (2023-11-26 19:16:38+00:00): Hi. Well not really indeed. I hesitated between that and just put a point with tourism=attraction. I'll go with the latter.
Friendly_Ghost (2023-11-26 21:39:20+00:00): If the name does not meet verifiability standards, then why should it be mapped at all?
Ombrefeu (2023-11-26 21:51:06+00:00): Because it has been made for several places used as filming locations. And the osm wiki doesn't talk about that specific case. It's fixed now, not a big deal.
Friendly_Ghost (2023-11-26 21:54:57+00:00): This is not "fixed". You wouldn't want downtown New York filled with tourism=attraction nodes for each film that was made there either, for the same reason. 

If there is some physical object that is recognisable as something that is related to filming, like permanent props, you could map them, but this doesn't seem to be such a case, so it shouldn't be mapped.
Ombrefeu (2023-11-27 05:49:48+00:00): I get your point, but it's not like a random street of NYC, that place is a major spot of the show, perfectly recognizable, where a structure is built during the shoot. Some ground structures are visible between filming, where the props are removed, and to have been there, many people go there in "pilgrimage".
In a forum I said that in that specific case, where the spot is central and perfectly recognizable in a movie or else, it can be tagged.
It's not different of many overs, like Edoras from The Lord of the Rings in New Zealand for example. It's just a hill where a whole city has been built, and completely removed after the shoot. There's a tourism=attraction spot on it.
I'm not saying you're completely wrong, I wouldn't put a tag for each filming spot of the show, but for that one, according to the few informations I found on forums, it seems to be acceptable. And useful. It is showed in a video where an OSM user lists filming locations of OSM, and many people will be happy to find it on OSM, because it's not that easy to locate.
Even the owner of the area has set a panel on his gate to give informations about it.
What do you think?
Glassman (2023-11-26 23:15:19+00:00): We don't map parcels since they are not verifiable. Also, just place the address on the house. That will enable routers to find it. No need for a separate address node on the driveway. Can you fix this edit? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144466051
lucarager (2023-11-27 01:07:25+00:00): Hi there, thank you for the notes. 
Unfortunately, most routers will mistakenly route to 38th for this address (of which I am the owner). My various changes are based on suggestions from the community and hopefully will have effect as routing data is updated. I will remove the parcel - note that it is based on survey data and my ownership documentation.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144466051
Glassman (2023-11-27 01:40:03+00:00): I think once the routers have been updated with your change, it may take a week, they should use the driveway.

In case you didn't know, there are some routers built into the OSM display. Right next to the search GO button, just use the arrow and pick your router, start and end location
cielak42 (2023-11-26 14:52:04+00:00): Punkty, które tutaj przesunąłeś, nie określają położenia bram wejściowych, tylko pozycje adresów. Bramy wejściowe można oznaczyć osobnymi punktami z `entrance=*`.
Krzysio__123 (2023-11-26 16:10:29+00:00): Oki, dzięki bardzo za info. Posprzątam te adresy i bramy.
maro21 (2023-12-01 22:18:29+00:00): Jeśli punkty adresowe są w złym miejscu, to wystarczy je przesunąć, nie trzeba tworzyć nowych obiektów.
silversurfer83 (2023-11-26 13:47:03+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OSM und besonders in WaFkb :)

kurze Frage zu der Kneipe: Ist von außen noch irgendwas zu sehen, was auf die Kneipe hinweist?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144466520
wetzel (2023-11-26 16:44:55+00:00): Hallo, ja Gaststättenschild hängt noch
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144466520
silversurfer83 (2023-11-26 16:56:14+00:00): Alles klar. Danke.