piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nmirzash (2023-02-28 09:45:49+00:00): Hello Frans,
Thank you for reviewing our changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies for incorrect edits. Going forward, we will ensure to not repeat such errors again. Thanks once again for fixing the issue, looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
nmirzash
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-20 15:00:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9950976991
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158005376

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/253191244

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
ianlopez1115 (2023-02-20 15:20:50+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
eggie (2023-02-20 15:08:10+00:00): Dag Het Lankheet

Tip  Wanneer het daadwerkelijk de naam van het gebouw is dan beter de naam op de gebouwomtrek zetten. De naam zal dan zichtbaar worden op de kaart.
MVG
eggie
Het Lankheet (2023-02-22 11:18:16+00:00): Dank voor de tip eggie!
eggie (2023-02-22 14:36:11+00:00): De Botterbeek heb ik maar gelijk aangepast als vlak. Paar keer ctrl-f5  Dan zie je wel effect. 
Moet even de tijd krijgen om juist te renderen.
MVG
eggie
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
gurglypipe (2023-02-20 15:50:56+00:00): Hiya, thanks for your continuing work on updating path data from the National Trust.

Could you please consider splitting your edits up a bit? Other OSM contributors might be interested in checking the changes, and modifying 274 paths in one changeset makes that quite hard!

For example, this edit could have been roughly split into: Blea Tarn, Little Langdale, Holme Ground, Wetherlam/Swirl How, Monk Coniston, Coniston Village, Coniston Hall, Hoathwaite, Torver.

If the changes are split up a bit more then any discussions about possible queries/typos/irregularities in the changes are a bit easier to keep track of.

Thanks!
Roshmaps (2023-02-20 16:10:31+00:00): Hi Gurglypipe, cheers for the comment. I do appreciate you reminding me of this as sometimes its easy to get in the zone moving from one place to another :D. I will keep it in mind going forward during our mapping meetings. Cheers!
gurglypipe (2023-02-20 16:17:20+00:00): I know the feeling! Apologies if I comment on this edit again later — it’ll probably take me a few days to check through it so I might come back with some queries (but hopefully not!).

Happy editing! :)
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
ianlopez1115 (2023-02-20 15:20:54+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
adrianojbr (2023-04-05 19:02:47+00:00): Olá!

Estava gerando problema em algum lugar?

Pois até onde entende, na falta de oneway=* supõe-se que seja no.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132795238
Jener (2023-04-05 22:28:58+00:00): Oi, não tenho notícia de problema, mas a via tinha este atributo e a estrada tem espaço para duas pistas (duas mãos), ainda que não sinalizadas. Agora reparei noutras vias da região onde o atributo está vazio ou é "presume-se que não". Ignoro?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132795238
adrianojbr (2023-04-07 00:46:33+00:00): Sim, a ausência de oneway significa que é mão dupla. Mas não é errado usar oneway=no, especialmente quando pode haver dúvidas se deixar em branco como, por exemplo uma rua que parte é mão única e parte é mão dupla.

Apenas fiz o questionamento porque você usou o termo "mão simples", o que para mim ficou dúbio, pois conheço "mão dupla" ou "mão única" e "faixa simples" ou faixa dupla".

Na resposta agora você esclarece que pretendia mapear as faixas de rolamento. Então deve-se usar a tag lanes=*, preferencialmente onde houver as marcas de divisão de faixas. Porém, também é possível usá-la onde não há sinalização desde que o comportamento do trânsito seja como houvesse 2 faixas. Nesse caso, acrescenta-se lane_markings=no.

Abraço!
adrianojbr (2023-04-07 00:48:36+00:00): Complementando, há a etiqueta narrow=yes indicando que nesse trecho a via é estreita, o que seria contraditório caso fosse acrescentada lanes=2 (mesmo que com lane_markings=yes).

Acho que está de bom tamanho narrow=yes + oneway=no, para deixar claro que a via é estreita mas mesmo assim é de mão dupla.
Jener (2023-04-08 19:44:31+00:00): Boa parte das vias da região têm duas mãos, algumas têm apenas uma pista, mas sendo a única via de acesso mesmo elas têm as duas mãos. 
Não sei porquê por vezes aparece o atributo Oneway e noutras não, imagino que seja pelos conjuntos de atributos padrão de cada elemento do OSM e que os diferentes tipo de vias tenham diferentes conjuntos.
Peço desculpa pelo "mão simples", é fruto da minha falta de experiência com a terminologia. 
A estrada para Sertão do Ribeirão é pavimentada com chão batido e não tem sinalização alguma das faixas, no máximo tem algumas placas. Eu fui lá há quase e ano e não recordo o quão estreita é a estrada, e ainda que eu duvide que haja espaço para acostamento eu prefiro não arriscar uma informação da qual não tenho certeza. O acréscimo que posso fazer é lane_markings=no (o que poderia ser um padrão para as vias com chão batido que eu conheço do Brasil).
Te agradeço pela gentil atenção e pelas orientações! =]
Um abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132795238
Jener (2023-04-09 21:55:16+00:00): Boa parte das vias da região têm duas mãos, recordo de umas poucas com apenas uma pista, mas sendo a única via de acesso elas têm as duas mãos. 
Não sei porquê por vezes aparece o atributo Oneway e noutras não, imagino que seja pelos conjuntos de atributos padrão de cada elemento do OSM e que os diferentes tipo de vias tenham diferentes conjuntos.
Peço desculpa pelo "mão simples", é fruto da minha falta de experiência com a terminologia. 
A Estrada do Sertão é pavimentada com chão batido e não tem sinalização alguma das faixas, no máximo tem algumas placas. Eu fui lá há quase e ano e não recordo o quão estreita é a estrada, e ainda que eu duvide que haja espaço para acostamento eu prefiro não arriscar uma informação da qual não tenho certeza. O acréscimo que posso fazer é lane_markings=no, o que poderia ser um padrão para as vias com chão batido que eu conheço.
Te agradeço pela gentil atenção e pelas orientações! =]
Um abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132795238
Frans S (2023-02-21 17:17:19+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
ianlopez1115 (2023-02-20 15:20:57+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mapperue (2023-06-30 10:13:04+00:00): Ahoj, do názvu sa nepíše opis miesta ako si uviedol tu: "Veľká Skalka - benediktínsky kláštor,kostol a jaskynka"
Takýto popis patrí do značky popis - description. Názov je iba "Veľká Skalka" alebo "Kláštor Veľká Skalka".
moonraver (2023-07-01 21:04:08+00:00): ahoj, súhlas
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mbyte (2023-03-13 06:56:11+00:00): Hallo Kienzles,
Die von dir eingetragenen Fahrradboxen existieren nicht an dieser Stelle nicht. Der Boxen sind in der Nähe des Geldautomaten und bereits eingetragen
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
eggie (2023-02-20 16:04:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-02-20 19:24:01+00:00): Måske håbede han at der bliver færre ting vi andre skal fixe, hvis du selv rydder op efter dig.

Du kan ikke bare forlade dig på at andre retter dine fejl.
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
dcapillae (2023-02-20 15:45:06+00:00): Buenas tardes.

Hasta donde yo sé, este objeto no tiene dirección postal. No debería tener ninguna etiqueta de dirección asociada.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
Pavol33 (2023-02-20 16:00:56+00:00): Guten Abend.
alles klar.
Danke Dir.
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
eggie (2023-02-21 09:05:29+00:00): Dag tomhu...  Lijkt me correct..  Wissen geen probleem, want het niet de adresnode.
MVG
eggie
Frans S (2023-03-08 14:14:22+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,
On this page you can see what had to be adjusted on your mappings.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132797094
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings has to be tagged as building=yes

Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.




See also this documenthttps://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
Frans S (2023-02-22 14:02:17+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult project.
About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
EvanSiroky (2023-02-28 22:19:49+00:00): Hey there! I'm a local mapper from Scotts Valley, California. I see that you requested a review of this changeset, so I'm giving it a review.

You have added a lot of great and mostly correctly formatted information about this business. However, the "image" tag appears to be an email address, so the "email" tag should be used here instead.

Also, since this business appears to be located within a large building, I would recommend also adding information in the "Unit" field and potentially even add the "addr:floor" tag to indicate which floor the business is located on.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:floor

Thanks for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!