piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-21 11:40:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996335610

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2024-04-02 14:04:03+00:00): Hello Tatiana Bo, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Frans S (2024-03-21 14:50:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
You retagged a residential highway into a track.  Not correct. See undermentioned explanation.
A remark about mapping highways
How to decide when a trace is a path or an unclassified highway
First, look what they connect.  Houses, settlements, villages. Then measure the width of that trace.
In iDeditor 

Shortcut : Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle  opens measurement panel
Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.
If a trace is max 2 meters wide, tag it as a path.
Wider and connect hamlets, houses and villages should be tagged as unclassified.
Tag residential in urban areas (villages, towns)
In JOSM, use the measure tab, or draw a circle (round building, shortcut Alt-Z when the building plugin is installed)) between the shoulders of a trace and read the distance on the lower toolbar. (remove the circle after that)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
This is mentioned about tracks on the
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routing#Routing_considerations

Quote: Tracks are roads of agricultural purpose. They usually connect fields to farms. The surface sometimes makes them inaccessible for regular cars, or at least limits the speeds to a very slow pace. Tracks should always be avoided for through-going traffic or within urban areas.
Best regards
maraf24 (2024-04-10 17:40:50+00:00): unclassified to nie jest droga poza klasyfikacją.
drogi na pola oznaczamy jako track
352 Digital (2024-04-16 15:16:21+00:00): My company is 352 Digital NOT 352 Fit 4 Digital - please change it back
limes11 (2024-03-23 18:56:58+00:00): Moin. 

Ich habe die Grenze mit der Landesgrenze verschmolzen und das gesamte Gebiet grob erfasst. Die nördliche Grenze ist noch sehr genau ungenau...falls du Zeit uns Lust hast :)

VG
Warin61 (2024-06-14 11:34:04+00:00): Hi,
The complete line is not operational, the bit that is non operational should be tagged as under construction...
Warin61 (2024-08-17 04:30:51+00:00): No communication - yet altered back to operational 2 months ago .. while still not operational.. Poor behavior.
ivanbranco (2024-03-25 21:35:17+00:00): Hi Erasmus,

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/6726746319

the wikimedia_commons image you linked here doesn't depict a mosaic, also is the same file you linked in this other element: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11750250231/history

could you take a look at it?
Syl (2024-03-23 09:48:40+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai fusionné les deux bouts de la rue de Curnieu qui ne forment en fait qu'une seule route. On sépare les routes en plusieurs tracés seulement lorsqu'il y a une séparation physique entre les voies. Bonne journée.
Patotaes (2024-03-23 10:09:06+00:00): Bonjour, c'est curieux qu'un l'îlot ne compte pas comme une séparation physique, mais comparé à d'autres dispositifje peux comprendre. Merci d'avoir corrigé ça, bonne journée aussi.
Syl (2024-03-23 11:41:39+00:00): La séparation des routes au niveau de l'îlot est pertinente, je l'ai laissé. J'ai seulement modifié le petit bout de route au sud qui n'a pas d'îlot.
tekim (2024-03-21 14:36:35+00:00): Hello, Thanks for the edits to OpenStreetMap (OSM)!  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Maps or Google Street View when editing OSM due to Google's terms of use.
stanis_geops (2024-03-21 14:40:29+00:00): Hi, I did not copy data from Google Services. I just used Street view as an additional source to verify the position that is also available in public datasets such as DIDOK:  https://opentransportdata.swiss/de/dataset/service-points-actual-date
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-19 17:16:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160403684 where the changeset comment is: revert various abandoned/razed railway edits
tastrax (2024-03-23 03:56:33+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Igor Bubelov (2024-03-23 05:09:19+00:00): Hi! Thanks for fixing it, I'll follow the guide you mentioned for the future edits. 

Does OSM offer any formatting helper tools? I noticed that some tags have widgets and warnings, that would be nice to have something like that for the phone numbers.
tastrax (2024-03-23 06:00:33+00:00): There is a greyed out prompt on the telephone key which has the +61 etc (whilst in AU) and there are some validation tools in different editors (ID, JOSM etc) and there are also apps that can make it slightly easier for specific tags but phone tagging is quite complex world wide. I just use an Overpass query to find common issues and correct them (Australia only). There are only a few each day so its not that onerous and it helps new mappers to get on top of the tagging early on in their map careers.
rskedgell (2024-03-21 15:18:22+00:00): Thanks for updating this. However, access=private may be more appropriate here than access=permit. The permit value is defined as:

"Open only to people who have obtained a  permit granting them access, but permit is ordinarily granted. If permit is hard to obtain, then it is typically access=private."

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Damien_Hersey (2024-03-21 16:43:27+00:00): Makes sense
aceman444 (2024-06-05 23:31:03+00:00): Dovod na tuto zmenu? Takze amenity=doctors vovnutri amenity=doctors? 'healthcare=centre' je asi lepsie na cele zdravotne stredisko.
A preco building=public? To podla akeho systemu?
aceman444 (2024-06-06 00:02:29+00:00): Ja civic a public rozlisujem, ale podla wiki vyzera byt ich vyznam asi rovnaky, takze znovu nebol dovod to menit.
mapperue (2024-06-06 06:38:50+00:00): Budova, kde sú asi 2 praktici a 1 zubár a lekáreň je klinika? Podľa šiki má mať klinika minimálne 10 lekárov a rôzne špecializácie, prípadne byť špecializovaným zariadením.
Potom radšej nech je to len budova bez "amenity", keďže amenity=doctors sa používa pre jednotlivých lekárov.
zhiar590 (2024-03-26 22:29:40+00:00): can you stop editing this road here to under construction, its already opened
little_maper (2024-03-27 08:29:40+00:00): Hello zhiar590;
You added street and it didn't appear in any satellite images so i converted it to under construction,
Could you mention the source you used to add this street?
Regards
little_maper
zhiar590 (2024-03-28 23:04:52+00:00): hello little_maper
im from the city of kalar im aware of every changes happening i have a picture of the new road that just finished recently, the satellite image is outdated its somewhere around february-march 2023 and here is a post of the new road in facebook posted in 16th march: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/Wq995GpqRQnfrnCX/?mibextid=WC7FNe, 
regards 
zhiar590
little_maper (2024-03-31 07:26:00+00:00): Hello zhiar590;
Thank you for providing me with this information, you can capture an image for the sign it will be helpful for the community also,
You can use also "mapillary" to take ground-level imagery for new streets that opened or new signs that you find:
Here link might help you
How to Contribute to Mapillary
https://blog.mapillary.com/update/2022/08/31/getting-started-with-mapillary.html
Regards
little_maper
bxl-forever (2024-03-21 13:06:18+00:00): Hello,

I won’t comment about the change in Madrid, which seems to be innocuous, but your edit also erased a boundary area in Poland to retag it as a river.  This is a damaging edit and we reverted this.
eggie (2024-03-21 15:39:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
dadavid (2024-04-22 15:32:41+00:00): moin nick, 

der Fußweg hier [1] hat keine Hausnummer, oder? :D 

Habs mal gefixt, aber schau gern nochmal drüber, ob da noch ein Name drangehört oder so

Grüße und weiterhin viel Spass beim mappen :) 

David

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135585996/history
nick-28 (2024-04-25 18:25:37+00:00): Hallo David,

nein, der Fußweg hat sicherlich keine Hausnummer. Der Fehler stammte aber nicht von mir. Name ist auch nicht nötig, deshalb alles in Ordnung so.

Gruß, Nick
eggie (2024-03-21 15:39:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
canfe (2024-03-21 16:41:53+00:00): Non so se stai facendo la cosa giusta.
La comunità non ama ID perché non ne rispetta le decisioni.
Vedo un  Eni ma poi un PENNY tutto maiuscolo.
Chi lo decide se va tutto maiuscolo?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148963446
BR_pebble (2024-07-18 12:18:31+00:00): Hello Kingsley AMANKWE
Thank you for mapping!
Created the missing building polygons at
8.4487415, 8.708368,8.4486891, 8.7084801,8.4486891, 8.7084801,8.4469457, 8.7083273,8.4470846, 8.7085747 .
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
Hufkratzer (2024-03-21 20:49:20+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1264808777 sieht nicht aus wie eine Reitanlage/Reiterhof, eher wie ein Reitplatz, so wie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231165855. Kann man in JOSM mit dem Preset für "Pferdesport" taggen. Siehe auch
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256161243
TimonBd (2024-03-21 21:24:55+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis.
Ist nun behoben und ich kann es nächstes mal richtig taggen.
HirschKauz (2024-03-22 14:37:42+00:00): hi g_195 (interessanter username ;-) ) 
Danke für das Eintrafgen der Details im Wohngebiet Am Entenfang. 
Erlaube mir ein paar Details: 
- PKW-Stellplätze in einem Wohngebiet werden üblicherweise nicht gemapt, das kann über https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Street_parking erfasst werden. 
- in einer living_street soll kein max_speed=* benutzt werden, da hier maxspeed=7 schon implizit ist 
- die fixme=* habe ich entfernt, da der Straßenverlauf gut mit den Orthobildern übereinstimmt ;-) 
Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß
HirschKauz
g_195 (2024-03-22 14:44:32+00:00): Hi,  danke für die Infos. Jetzt bin ich schlauer ;-)
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-21 14:40:07+00:00): Добрый день!

Раз Вы на профессиональной основе занимаетесь картографированием, будьте, пожалуйста, внимательнее к тому, что вы редактируете. На каждом здании из этого ченджсета висит name=СНТ Звезда. Ну это же абсурд. Далее, Вы вносите addr:city=Барыбино, но Барыбино - не город, а микрорайон г. Домодедово. Вот его точка: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/401291687#map=19/55.26960/37.89450
Для адреса это даёт тег addr:suburb=Барыбино.
А СНТ Звезда находится внутри этого микрорайона, его надо заносить в тег addr:place.
Исправьте, пожалуйста.
mueschel (2024-03-31 15:17:38+00:00): You added the source tag "Google Street View" here. Please be aware that Google images are not available under a license compatible with OSM.
Please revert all edits you did based on their images.
Arflha (2024-04-01 16:29:30+00:00): Done
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-21 20:44:32+00:00): Вы пишете "Исправлен адрес", но на самом деле из одной ошибки Вы делаете другую. Нет города Караман-2, и тег "addr:city=Карамар-2" неверен. Исправьте, пожалуйста.
user_2061236 (2024-03-22 07:19:03+00:00): Co znamená u uzlu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8065210043
disused? Kontejnery tam jsou, ale nepoužívají se, nebo tam nejsou, nebo byly přesunuty jinam?
dpolovinkin (2024-03-24 22:54:03+00:00): hi!
please take a look, really :)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

it's pretty obvious but "update" is objectively bad changeset comment giving 0 info on what was done
dpolovinkin (2024-05-27 12:38:46+00:00): I see you continue to contribute - with the same UPDATE changeset comments. Did you see my previous comment here?
stanis_geops (2024-03-21 14:44:00+00:00): Hi, I did not copy data from Google Services. I just used Street view as an additional source to verify the position that is also available in public datasets such as DIDOK: https://opentransportdata.swiss/de/dataset/service-points-actual-date
tekim (2024-03-21 15:20:42+00:00): Hi, Thanks for the response, however, you are not allowed to use Google Maps, Google Earth, Google Street View, or Google Imagery as a source, including an "additional source."  Google's terms of use state "you may not... use Google Maps/Google Earth to create or augment any other mapping-related dataset"  Using Google Maps etc. as "an additional source" when editing OSM is using it to "augment" another "mapping-related dataset"
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-04 10:59:54+00:00): Hello! Can you look at this object and other?

It seems quite clear that name that you added to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1264820286 is actually wrong  can you fix it there and on other objects where it was mistakenly added?
tekim (2024-03-23 19:19:13+00:00): Hello, thanks for the edits.  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Street View when editing OSM due to Google's terms of use.  I look forward to seeing other edits from you that are based on acceptable sources.
danieldegroot2 (2024-03-22 13:13:43+00:00): Hey BrieQ,

I will again mention the POI details are already on the building in this case, so please change the building details instead if needed.

Regards,

Daniel
danieldegroot2 (2026-06-18 14:07:36+00:00): Merged it with the building in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184273398
user_2092025 (2024-03-23 20:09:23+00:00): Łuk jest czynny i eksploatowany. Mimo że nie jest tędy obecnie wytyczona trasa żadnej zwykłej linii to wciąż występują przejazdy techniczne, objazdy w razie zatrzymań itp.
danieldegroot2 (2024-03-22 13:12:38+00:00): Hey BrieQ,

The details for Guineys are already present on the building;
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/332773284/history
The node you added looks mostly like a duplicate.
You should change the details on the building in this case.
(In most countries it is okay for either the building or a node to be used for the POI details); this may be inconsistent across the city.

Padmore and Barnes looks okay, assuming it still sells several completely different types of products in a single building (shoes and cameras).

Regards,

Daniel
HellMap (2024-03-22 10:44:14+00:00): Hi again,

A way like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1264824011 is very likely not a driveway unless the aerial is out of date. Driveways are roads that access individual properties, often private and not part of a public road network. Random roads like this in forests and fields are almost always tracks unless they actually lead to some place.
Eugene G (2024-03-22 10:56:40+00:00): Okay! Seems you already fixed it?
HellMap (2024-03-22 11:02:05+00:00): Yes, I did, I should have mentioned. I changed these to tracks, just wanted to make sure this wasn't a recently-built road or something.
Eugene G (2024-03-22 11:03:41+00:00): No, it isn't. Thanks!
android5027 (2024-09-07 20:52:47+00:00): Hi Elenfoxx! I see from your [profile](https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Elenfoxx) that you've started mapping this year. Glad to have you mapping in Searcy!

I would like to propose that we change the roads in the Parkside Apartments complex from highway=living_street to highway=driveway or highway=parking_aisle.

Living Streets in OpenStreetMap have a specific meaning. From the [Wiki for the highway=living_street tag](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street), "A general feature of living streets is that the legislation grants pedestrians higher or equal right of way over other road users."

What do you think?
Elenfoxx (2024-09-08 16:24:04+00:00): Oh, my bad! We definitely should change that, then. Let me see if I can do it …
android5027 (2024-09-08 18:48:34+00:00): Cool—Let me know if I can help.

Once again, great to have you mapping in Searcy!
Elenfoxx (2024-09-09 14:26:27+00:00): Thanks! So, I tried to change it, but I don't see either driveway nor parking_aisle in the drop down menu. If you have those, could you please change it?
android5027 (2024-09-13 14:45:03+00:00): Sure!

I changed it in Changeset #156575887. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156575887
android5027 (2024-09-13 14:56:06+00:00): In the future, you may have more luck changing the type of a road by clicking the large "Feature Type" button and searching for the new type.

The smaller dropdown only allows changing between sub-types of the same "Feature Type".
CaldeiraG (2024-03-21 16:06:40+00:00): Boa tarde, fiz uma alteração para adicionar que se trata de um armázem self-storage, obrigado por contribuir!
silversurfer83 (2024-03-21 21:04:12+00:00): Gude marvin :)

kleiner Hinweis bzgl. abgerissener Objekte:
Wenn ich mir die Ecke da auf dem Luftbild "Hessen DOP" ansehe, dann sehe ich da noch die Gebäude. Und dann ist mein erster Reflex noch grad aufs Kataster zu gucken und wenn die da auch noch drin sind, dann zeichne ich die wieder ein.

Um sowas zu verhindern (und für andere Dinge auch noch) gibt es die lifecycle prefixes. Die setzt man vor alle betroffenen Eigenschaften eines Objekts und alles, was wirklich weg kann, kann gelöscht werden.

In diesem konkreten Fall würde aus
"building=yes" einfach
"razed:building=yes".
Damit verschwindet es beim nächsten Update aus der sichtbaren Karte, der Umriss ist aber noch für alle Mapper*innen zu sehen. Wenn dann noch ein
"note=Gebäude Stand $DATUM abgerissen. NICHT neu einzeichnen" dran ist, ist alles klar.

Details im Wiki unter
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148968708
marvin3 (2024-03-21 22:16:02+00:00): Hallo
Ok das macht Sinn.
Danke für den Hinweis.
HellMap (2024-03-22 10:37:55+00:00): Hi!

Is this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1264830293 really a pedestrian street? It looks much more narrow unless the aerial is out of date.

Thanks
Eugene G (2024-03-22 10:53:55+00:00): I'm not sure about it. So I may change to just a footway.
HellMap (2024-03-22 10:58:47+00:00): Yeah, it's probably a footway if you are tracing it from aerial and not based on a recent survey. There are very few pedestrian streets in Latvia and almost none of them in minor locations like this, so it stands out.
Eugene G (2024-03-22 11:01:34+00:00): Thank you for your help,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149007181
map per (2024-03-23 20:24:53+00:00): Wegen review_requested: 
Hab noch "So" in "Su" geändert, ansonsten passt alles
CAI Stabia (2024-03-22 08:25:17+00:00): Buongiorno Domenico, ci siamo accorti che, come già evidenziato già in passato, stai effettuando numerosi changeset tutti con la dicitura "errata corrige".
Nel ringraziarti per il tuo lavoro di mapper, ti chiediamo la cortesia di dettagliare meglio ogni changeset, inserendo un titolo più esplicativo al fine di far comprendere agli altri mapper cosa stai facendo, così come indicato al seguente link:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_change

Ti ringrazio anticipatamente
TestSkizze (2024-10-27 10:35:19+00:00): Hallo Skigido, wir haben kürzlich deinen Eintrag dieser "Gaisalm abkürzung" (die ist aber woanders...) zum Anlass genommen, um dort von oben kommend abzusteigen. 
Schau dir mal die dort gestern gesetzte Note einer Almerin an. 
Inwieweit könnte dieser "Pfad" an die reellen Gegebenheiten (nur abschnittsweise Trittspuren) in OSM "zurückgebaut" werden?
andorra72 (2024-11-02 17:25:33+00:00): Hallo Skigido, auch nochmal direkt die Bitte des "Rückbaus" an dieser Stelle. Ich bin seit Jahren jedes Jahr auf der Alm.  Seit diesem Sommer sind regelmäßig E-Biker und Wanderer mit Blick aufs Smartphone da hoch gelaufen/gefahren und haben kurz danach wieder aufgegeben und sind  zurückgekommen. Die neue Verbindung verführt leider viele den Weg zu beschreiten anstatt den offiziellen Wanderweg zu gehen. In dem Bereich sind auch Birkhühner unterwegs. Im Sinne des Naturschutz wäre es schön, wenn dieser Weg nicht begangen wird.
TestSkizze (2024-12-30 17:42:08+00:00): Hallo @andorra72, ich habe diesen "Pfad" hier in OSM im Rahmen eines Kompromisses "zurückgebaut". Abschnittsweise sind Trittspuren von Almwirtschaft und Jäger vorhanden, daher im Waldbereich "als Möglichkeit" belassen, jedoch mit Beschreibung "Jägersteig" versehen. Im Bereich der Weidefläche(n) unterbrochen, da dort nicht sichtbar - somit ist keine automatische Routengenerierung via dieser Linie möglich. 
Offenbar verläuft hier im Spätwinter eine Skitouren-Route zur Seekarspitze... 
Werde im Sommer'25 das Gebiet nochmals erkunden... 
OSM darf vorhandene Möglichkeiten (realitätsnah) zeigen, muß aber verantwortungsbewußt einen Kompromiss zw. Naturschutz und (Massen)Tourismus finden.
TestSkizze (2024-10-27 10:25:25+00:00): Hallo Skigido, dein Eintrag dieses (gesperrten) Steigs irritiert mich - was war hier deine Motivation? 
Wir sind kürzlich dort von oben kommend abgestiegen und haben außer dem Eingang in die Latschengasse nichts wesentliches erkennen können.
Frans S (2024-03-22 09:24:27+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Mapped clusters of buildings. Each building needs to be mapped individually without connecting their nodes. We assume each building has its own walls
Not all mappings are squared.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148969587
eggie (2024-03-21 15:42:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Het beste kun je gewoon op de adresnode iets bijtaggen. Ook de aard van het bedrijf vermelden.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-03-21 20:29:34+00:00): Dag Nattodon,

Wanneer hier geen bezoekadres is en alleen een webwinkel nemen we deze niet op in OSM.
Is alleen een webwinkel van toepassing dan svp de tagging verwijderen.
De hamvraag is heeft de vestiging een bezoekadres voor publiek en/of leveranciers?
MVG
eggie
Davileci (2025-12-12 07:06:56+00:00): The postcode is 26200 rather than 01330, which corresponds to Labastida.
5R-MFT (2025-12-12 12:29:02+00:00): Oh, I believe i copy this from a postcode around. But now is fixed if I didn't forgot one.
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-21 21:50:17+00:00): Да, Вы исправили тег addr:city, но удалили адресную принадлежность микрорайону Защитино, которую надо вносить тегом addr:suburb=Защитино.

Посмотрите в ЕГРН на адрес, например: город Тобольск, микрорайон "Защитино", улица Парковая, №11