piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JJIglesias (2024-12-21 01:02:05+00:00): Para tu informacion EE.SS., FF.AA., RR.SS., EE.UU. y demás compresiones son Términos INTERNACIONALES. La ANH no las pone por Diversion sino por Norma Internacional. Precisamente eso se hace para ello.
JJIglesias (2024-12-21 01:05:56+00:00): Se llaman ESTANDARES INTERNACIONALES (ISO)
5m4u9 (2024-12-21 21:45:48+00:00): Lo curioso es que EESS no aparecen en los carteles de las gasolineras sino E.S. o peor aún E°S°, y que parecen ser una abreviación del nombre para que pueda entrar. 

Al punto que voy es que si en la gasolinera, escuela, centro de salud, puente, cartel señalética de la esquina de la calle, cartel de destino en carreteras, etc. que tenga una abreviatura debemos desabreviar para quitar ambigüedades.

ejemplos: 

*sin EESS, Biopetrol (santa cruz), pero en OSM con EE.SS. ????
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-17.726292000000015&lng=-63.16587000000004&z=17.688307687835977&pKey=1502773053798795&focus=photo&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&x=0.6203909722134262&y=0.49998379456636033&zoom=0

* otro sin EESS, san antonio (sucre)
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-19.050820344521&lng=-65.24800952616&z=16.420932089225726&pKey=973998050166329&focus=photo&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap

* con solo E.S., ayacucho (cbba)
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-17.383012699972&lng=-66.16074600000002&z=18.717098665644755&pKey=827215038543069&focus=photo&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&x=0.3026687095617353&y=0.5012309155000116&zoom=0

* con E.S., eben ezer (oruro)
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-17.9775715525&lng=-67.058821543889&z=16.92542234739113&pKey=627575045750600&focus=photo&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&x=0.5025438401475872&y=0.6015581034102859&zoom=1.1063122923588038

* con E°S°, uruguay (la paz)
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-17.383012699972&lng=-66.16074600000002&z=18.717098665644755&pKey=827215038543069&focus=photo&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&x=0.3026687095617353&y=0.5012309155000116&zoom=0

* otro E°S°, vinto (oruro)
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-17.977142482778&lng=-67.060182848889&z=16.92542234739113&pKey=1767365166973445&focus=photo&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&x=0.3922845291440695&y=0.5093309765171646&zoom=1.5149501661129567

* y uno completo, Estación de Servicio San Cristóbal (Uyuni)
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-20.454267533333&lng=-66.830779714444&z=17.621641732928772&pKey=1221195418456846&focus=photo&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap
JJIglesias (2024-12-22 08:19:06+00:00): Te repito el Nombre y DENOMINACION OFICIAL lo da la ANH y es EE.SS. xxx ciertamente muchos carteles antiguos dicen E.S. pero precisamente la ANH cambio eso para poner la ABREVIACION INTERNACIONAL NORMALIZADA que es EE.SS. 

Cada Gasolinera debe tener ese Cartel COLOCADO por orden de la ANH.

Es lo mismo que cuando el Minedu mando a cambiar todos los Colegios, Escuelas y demás por U.E. fueran publicos o privados.

El Gobierno es quien NORMALIZA, luego nombres comerciales o alt_name pueden tener 1000 si quieres pero el nombre LEGAL es uno solo y lo pone la ANH. Guste o no guste...
JJIglesias (2024-12-22 08:24:05+00:00): El que creo o puso nombre al 90% de las Gasolineras que están en el Mapa fui yo, y ajuste los nombres segun la norma de esa época de la ANH que decia ES, luego cambiaron a EE.SS. y por eso se han ido progresivamente cambiando. 

Obviamente no estan todas, porque en este pais hay más cosas que mapear que los banquitos de las plazas de Cochabamba...
5m4u9 (2024-12-23 19:46:33+00:00): Está por demás y fuera de lugar tu último comentario que infravalora el trabajo ajeno, pero es tu sello. No todos vivimos por y para los autos.

Qué algo tenga un nombre oficial no hace que sea intocable y tenga que ser "así como está" añadido en OSM. La recomendación está ahí en la wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(do_not)).
JJIglesias (2024-12-25 07:36:18+00:00): No infravaloro tu trabajo, pero estemos claros que a ti solo te interesa la ciudad de Cochabamba, y si no fuera por 1 o 2 mappers más el mapa de Bolivia estaría mayoritariamente en Blanco.

Todo lo q dice la Wiki No obliga a que no pongas los nombres oficiales así sean abreviados al estilo oficial. Yo no estoy en contra que se pongan nombre alternativos y nombres comerciales con sus respectivas etiquetas aplicables.

Pero SI estoy a favor que si existe (de hecho) un Denominación Oficial de un elemento, tal Denominación es la que debería aparecer en el Mapa, aparte de todos los nombres alternativos que se les puedan ocurrir. Los Estándares Internacionales los inventaron para Normalización y armonización y eso INCLUYE a OSM, por muy Open Source que "querramos" ser...
5m4u9 (2024-12-25 15:49:46+00:00): Aclarando, yo estoy totalmente de acuerdo en colocar los nombres oficial, porque en Bolivia pusieron y ponen los nombres como sea, acortando o poniendo abreviaciones (segundo nombres y/o apellidos, UE, Min., Dptal, Mcpal), porque el cartel no es lo suficientemente largo o traducciones mal hechas de nombres extranjero incluso del quechua.

El mapa por su uso en el estado, yo lo veo como un medio para "mostar" los nombres oficiales y que la gente se familiarice. El caso más emblemático es SEMAPA que lo usa todos los días para comunicar sus obras.

La otra vez me increpaste por cambiar al nombre oficial de una avenida, y ahora me sales a favor del nombre oficial, no llego a entender esa lógica. 

Obviamente, nadie está obligado a seguir al pie la wiki, pero es una buena guía para estandarizar. 

En que afecta que se desabrevie un nombre así sea oficial? Si su objetivo es informa mejor y evitar interpretaciones erróneas... 

Con respecto a editar principalmente en Cochabamba, yo no me siento "responsable" de editar en todo Bolivia, jamás lo haría, yo edito lo que conozco, tengo documentación o voy a visitar próximamente. Si vos te sientes con el deber de "hacer el mapa de Bolivia" bien 👏👏, pero tu tono desincentiva y ningunea solo porque me interesa un cierto lugar. No todos (especialmente los más jóvenes) somos "tan patriotas" y eso no esta ni mal ni bien.
JJIglesias (2024-12-26 00:49:07+00:00): Para aclarar yo no hago el mapa de Bolivia por "patriotismo" lo hago por necesidad práctica. Yo viajo constantemente y uso el mapa, al igual que muchos de mis compañeros y comunidad. Por eso lo pongo claro yo no mapeo para los Renders pero SI mapeo para los Usuarios Finales (Users) no solo para llenar el mapa de datos sin uso practico alguno... 

Diferencia fundamental, la mayoría de los "mappers" que contribuyen y son de Bolivia llenan una base de datos... otros pocos hacemos un mapa...
VLD522 (2025-03-06 13:21:39+00:00): Hola JJIglesias:
Gracias por tu comentario y por la explicación correspondiente. Lo tendré en cuenta en futuras ediciones.
bxl-forever (2024-12-19 14:55:48+00:00): Hello,

It looks like you also erased the highway type of a road in Canada.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106215374/history
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-19 14:30:55+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/698281854

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-11 23:09:31+00:00): DWG revert for vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161257098
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-11 23:30:40+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17090
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-19 14:41:04+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Dobrynia":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674264611
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/700393935
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/700393936
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/700393937
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/700393938
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/700393941
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/700393942

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
hwierzbicki (2024-12-19 18:11:58+00:00): Hi Greg,

I’m a bit unclear about the purpose of this edit—it seems you’ve deleted three existing communication mast nodes and replaced them with new nodes tagged as communication towers.

A few concerns:

1. By removing the original nodes instead of simply re-tagging them, you’ve erased their edit history. This goes against best practices as outlined here: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

2. The correct tag for these structures is man_made=mast, not man_made=tower. According to the OSM Wiki: “A tower is accessible and provides platforms, whereas a mast only offers ladder steps to climb it.”

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dtower

Notably, one of the deleted nodes was one you originally added as a mast.

3. Deleting the nodes has also removed additional descriptive tags, such as the construction type, which were not re-added in your edit.

Would you mind clarifying the reasoning behind this changeset?
hwierzbicki (2024-12-20 17:49:12+00:00): Hi Greg,

Responding to your PMs here.

Thanks for explaining the issue. If the iD editor isn’t showing mobile_phone in the dropdown, I’d recommend reporting it as a bug on the iD GitHub page:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD

As a workaround, you could manually add the communication:mobile_phone tag without using the dropdown or try another editor, rather than deleting the nodes.

Regarding the tower vs. mast distinction:

- Towers must be freestanding and provide platforms for accessibility.

- Masts can be either freestanding OR guyed and must not have platforms, offering only ladder steps for access.

The key difference is accessibility. The presence or absence of guy wires does not determine the classification. For example, the wiki page for masts features a freestanding monopole-style structure as the example photo.

Based on this, the three sites you changed to towers align more with the definition of masts.
InsertUser (2025-01-19 13:58:08+00:00): Please save before moving on to another area as this makes it easier for others to check.
sorcrosc (2025-01-05 16:22:10+00:00): L'indirizzo non corrisponde al luogo. Come è stato mappato?
Yog Sot (2024-12-19 17:45:17+00:00): z tym punktem coś chyba nie wyszło, bo zwraca warning
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11817015482
a obok jest przystanek na tym torze
bxl-forever (2024-12-19 14:58:35+00:00): Hello,

Please always make sure to type real descriptions when you upload data to the OSM database.

Changeset titles like "Kleine Änderungen" or "Diverse Änderungen" say nothing about what you did/why you changed something.

You might want to read this wiki page prior to doing further edits.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Thanks in advance.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-19 14:51:04+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674248825
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/978544008

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
JJIglesias (2024-12-19 18:57:17+00:00): The official name as per Government is JUTUN MAYU not Jatun Mayu, as per INE and IGM of Bolivia.

Keep in that way and place alt_name if you want. Please BEFORE changing ANY NAME, inquire the legal status of such names. And use alt_name tags as a solution. DO NOT REMOVE AT WILL this data that has an official source (ARE NO MISTAKES of the mappers)

Thanks
VLD522 (2025-01-27 14:58:55+00:00): Thank you for your comment. However, I could not find any sources that include the name 'Jutun Mayu'. I even tried searching the name using quotation marks but got no results. All the official/governmental sources I found, mentioned the name 'Jatun Mayu'.
micheleOSM3 (2026-02-27 20:38:16+00:00): Perché hai aggiunto Il sentiero degli ezzelini nella superroute Il Cammino di Sant'Antonio (Gemona - Padova) ?
Tra l'altro in una superroute non ci vanno le way ma solo altre route.
AndreaDp271 (2026-02-27 20:56:47+00:00): non mi pare di averlo fatto, guardando le due relazioni del cammino di S Antonio, hanno solo il cammino di S Antonio come relazione della relazione.
micheleOSM3 (2026-02-27 21:07:16+00:00): Boh, la history su JOSM sembrava indicare questo changeset sulla relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10275750 
Ma comunque adesso la correggo.
AndreaDp271 (2026-02-27 21:47:24+00:00): fai fai
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-19 15:01:08+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12433703848
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5709458649
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12433703843
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12433703842
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12433703841
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12433703847
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12433703846
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12433703845
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12433703844
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12433703839
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12433703838
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12433703837
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12433703836
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12433703840
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12433661588
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12433661587
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12433661586
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600430117
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600430118
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/663968175
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/663968176
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600445362
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600445363
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600445364
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600445366
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600445367
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600445368
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600445369
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600445370
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600445365
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600445378
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600445381
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600445382
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600445383

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
A67-A67 (2024-12-19 15:33:22+00:00): Hi,
It seems you've added historical railways that have been erased completely. OSM is a map of the present, not a historical map.

If traces are left, an historical railway can be mapped, but the line towards to old Aalsmeer station don't exist anymore. There are houses now. 

See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/niet-meer-bestaande-railways-mappen/122686/24
mga_geo (2024-12-20 12:17:03+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi avez-vous modifié l'attribut network de https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1258954 ?
Les suggestions d'iD ne sont pas toujours bonnes.
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
Merci d'avance
Marc
flohoff (2024-12-19 17:46:21+00:00): Good catch - Das routing ist da jetzt geschwenkt - Offensichtlich hatte da jemand die letzten 3m vergessen - Routing war jedenfalls kaputt - Jetzt heile:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=864513,943641#51.84559,8.06019,14z

Danke
BevinBash (2025-12-20 18:39:15+00:00): I ended up getting unjustly fired... Never do more for a corporation than they'd be willing to do for you. Unfortunately, I gave them more than they ever intended to give to me, and I regret my naivety more than I could convey.
A67-A67 (2024-12-19 15:37:13+00:00): Hi,
Could you please not add historical object that don't leave a trace anymore? OSM is a map of the present, not an historical map.

See also: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/niet-meer-bestaande-railways-mappen/122686/24

Besides, your connecting these historical railways to existing power lines. Why?
Stabilo_boss (2024-12-19 18:59:40+00:00): Hi, Apoligies, I will reply on the forum rather than here.
VladaC (2025-01-04 18:49:17+00:00): Ahoj, díky za editace. Jen prosím nepřidávejte name= k prvkům, které nemají název. Ohniště se ve většině map určitě zobrazí příslušným piktogramem. V případě "kadibudky" je možné typ záchodu popsat příslušnými tagy, např. jako zde: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10916164514 . Viz též https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:N%C3%A1zvy#N%C3%A1zev_je_pouze_n%C3%A1zev
Díky a vše nej v r. 2025, Vláďa
kingkingHK (2026-02-11 03:36:44+00:00): Hi there, is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12433769176 duplicating https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11684634793 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12433769175 ?
vectorial8192 (2026-02-11 04:26:51+00:00): It seems to me, by convention, there should have a single free node that contains the traffic signals ref info, and then several based nodes that actually describes where/how the traffic signals apply.
Kovoschiz (2026-02-11 07:30:32+00:00): Those `highway=traffic_signals` are wrong. It should be changed to `man_made=street_cabinet` at the controller.
kingkingHK (2026-02-11 11:11:37+00:00): @vectorial8192 perhaps you only thought that because of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73295449 which we have previously found to be poor-quality in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5004149 ?
vectorial8192 (2026-02-11 11:51:44+00:00): ... ????????

iirc I have never declared my stance on the mapping style of "free ref node"; this is observed to be seemingly a convention.

@kingkingHK You quoted a changeset. To clarify, my comment on that changeset is essentially "that free ref node shouldn't exist because there's no traffic signals at the roundabout". There is no judgement on whether it's good or bad.

At minimum only you @kingkingHK found the "free ref" mapping style to be of poor-quality. I find merits of that style, because now I can very easily know where a specific ref traffic signal is located.

@Kovoschiz mentioned putting the ref at the control box. This is definitely correct as expected from the style of OSM Global, but sometimes we just don't know where that box is, or maybe there are multiple boxes for the same set of signals.
vectorial8192 (2026-02-11 12:11:58+00:00): And, specifically, for this case, I did not know / did not notice where the control box is at.
kingkingHK (2026-02-11 13:05:53+00:00): > iirc I have never declared my stance on the mapping style of "free ref node"; this is observed to be seemingly a convention.

I never said you had a stance, I only pointed out that your convention observation may or may not be due to the quoted changeset which afaik affected all traffic signals in HK; it wouldn't be surprising if you saw their mistake (not knowing it was a mistake) and called it a convention. I apologise if my wording created some misunderstanding.

> To clarify, my comment on that changeset is essentially "that free ref node shouldn't exist because there's no traffic signals at the roundabout". There is no judgement on whether it's good or bad.

Imo, a node being 120+ metres away from where it should be is pretty bad. I hope this is not a controversial opinion.

> I find merits of that style, because now I can very easily know where a specific ref traffic signal is located.

Can't we have `ref=` on the `highway=traffic_signal` on the highway? This is the prevalent practice for tagging `=traffic_signal` `ref=` afaik.

> sometimes we just don't know where that box is

skill issue tbh

> maybe there are multiple boxes for the same set of signals

I am not aware that there are traffic signals like that, at least in Hong Kong. How would that even work? Two separate computers controlling the same light? I am only aware that sometimes multiple separate faraway junctions are controlled with the same box, as part of a green wave.

> And, specifically, for this case, I did not know / did not notice where the control box is at.

Coincidentally I went there today and saw it is at the south-west of the crossing.
trigpoint (2025-01-13 12:54:30+00:00): Hi
What is the purpose of removing tags from the way and creating a node?

They are better on the way.

Cheers Phil
rle32795 (2024-12-30 08:33:49+00:00): Näyttää hyvältä muutosten osalta.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160400589
Gleb_Artyomenko (2024-12-19 16:00:39+00:00): fixed road geometry was added based on Bing Maps Aerial #mapbox_linters
dzamper (2025-03-14 14:20:10+00:00): Na czym polegała ta edycja? Wyleciały z relacji prawie wszystkie przystanki między Zaborzem a Chebziem :/
adamos (2025-03-14 14:35:46+00:00): Hello, 
since this was one of the first edits made by the relatify tool, newly introduced also to tram lines, I guess this was a tool bug. Sorry for that.
adamos (2025-03-14 14:48:32+00:00): Fixed
b-jazz (2024-12-19 20:08:29+00:00): Hey there mech32. Nice to see that other people are actively working on golf course mapping. Thanks for your contributions!
There is one thing that I'd love to see you (and others) change in how things are mapped regarding fairways and greens. I see a lot of fairways that extend onto the green such that the ways for the green and fairway overlap, which isn't topographically correct. It might look okay when rendered, but isn't the "right way" to map things. It's like your saying that grass in the overlapping part is both green and fairway, which isn't right.
The correct thing to do would be to draw the fairway all the way around the green (extending slightly) and then combine the green and fairway into a "multipolygon" that says this whole thing is a fairway EXCEPT for the "inner" polygon that is the green. Here's an example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232699314.
Alternatively, if it makes sense based on satellite imagery, run the fairway up to the green and re-use the points of the green to define the border between the green and fairway.

If any of that is unclear, please let me know and I'll work to better explain it. Thanks!
felipeeugenio (2024-12-19 18:47:25+00:00): Hola.
Según la página de vialidad los nombres estaban bien. Hace algunos años el MOP cambió casi todos los roles y nombres de los caminos del país dejando varios de los carteles obsoletos. Por favor chequear eso siempre antes de cambiar los nombres. (https://sitministerial.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=ccc8ce73d80d4b48a4cbce97ff89d74c)
gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160401382
stillhart (2025-05-12 21:19:39+00:00): Wunderschön  🤩
Ronny Standtke (2025-05-12 21:26:59+00:00): Sehr gern geschehen! :-)
impiaaa (2024-12-19 22:01:00+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! When making contributions, please use the changeset description field to describe what you changed. It's also helpful to describe where you got the information—I can't find evidence that a butcher by that name exists here.
KarlaIbrahić (2024-12-20 07:56:33+00:00): Reverted because node was created. #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160421998
TrickyFoxy (2024-12-24 22:55:00+00:00): Нельзя брать данные из других карт
evod (2024-12-21 14:32:06+00:00): Looks good, I fixed the turn restrictions relations (allow going right from Taborstraße into Nordbahnstraße, but forbid U-Turn in the middle of the junction) and simplified the access tagging of the cycleway.

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160423159