piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:08:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:09:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:09:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:09:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:09:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:08:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:09:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:09:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
eggie (2025-08-25 15:38:49+00:00): Hi.. You removed all the highway tags so the roads wiil not render.
You replaced the roads by gates?
I don't think thats okay.

Just add access=private to the roads.

What is your problem here?

Greetz..
eggie
eggie (2025-08-25 16:04:49+00:00): reverted by changeset 170985122

All roads are tagged private.. and a road is not a gate.
Your edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170981815

greetz,
eggie
redmaster (2025-08-25 16:20:36+00:00): Clear, it was not the intention to change the roads to gates… all roads are private access, behind closed gates.

thanks for the correction
eggie (2025-08-25 16:33:09+00:00): No problem 😀
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:08:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:09:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
eggie (2025-08-25 16:00:03+00:00): reverted by changeset #170985034
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:09:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:09:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:09:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:09:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:09:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:09:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:08:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:09:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:09:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:09:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:08:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:09:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:09:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:08:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:09:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:08:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
pitfire (2025-08-26 03:17:20+00:00): Hallo Stypox,

bitte keine Trinkwasser Zapfstelle einrichten, dessen primärer Zweck die Wasserversorgung
für Friedhöfe erfüllt. Dann ist es „DE:Tag:man_made=water_tap“. Wenn das Wasser amtlich überprüft wurde, also z.B. Zapfstellen der öffentlichen Wasserversorgung, kann zusätzlich drinking_water:legal=yes erfasst werden. Kaum ein Friedhofbetreiber übernimmt die gesundheitliche Verantwortung mit der Freigabe als Trinkwasser. Das hast Du sicher hier vor Ort geprüft?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dwater_tap

VG pitfire
Stypox (2025-08-26 18:35:52+00:00): I assume the water comes from the aqueduct and is thus drinkable, however there was no explicit sign saying it was tested and/or drinkable. I just noticed it was not there on the map (as I was looking for a fountain) and decided to add it without much thinking, but I understand it would be better to just mark it as a water tap. Feel free to make the change yourself, I am not too familiar with the tags I should assign, and thank you very much for reviewing.
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:09:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:09:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:09:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
fortera_au (2025-08-25 22:53:28+00:00): Does the lack of a truck stop mean trucks can't pull into here? And the lack of a restaurant doesn't necessarily mean food isn't available. I think this (and any other edits like this) should be reverted, as they seem like a mechanical edit without a review.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170982586
TheSwavu (2025-08-25 23:42:27+00:00): I would have thought the bigger problem would be that this is now a U-GO servo. Also, why would they sell diesel (fuel:GTL_diesel = yes) and not allow hgv?
fortera_au (2025-08-25 23:44:56+00:00): Definitely seems like a mass (incorrect) re-tag across multiple changesets without any actual verification.
user_22909869 (2025-08-26 07:36:01+00:00): I doubt it'll be a Ugo, an area with so many active mappers such as yourselves would be keeping on top of things like that. And if it is a Ugo all these undocumented confusing tags should be removed as they probably changed when the business changed.
user_22909869 (2025-08-26 07:37:08+00:00): Oh Google shows it as Ugo so maybe. You should update it if you have a source for that. FYI Google isn't an acceptable source.
fortera_au (2025-08-26 07:39:49+00:00): The brand changes are usually just rebrands, the stations themselves stay the same. However, the main concern was the tags that you changed, where the meaning of the old tag isn't the same as the new one. If you haven't verified those changes, they should be reverted.
user_22909869 (2025-08-26 07:39:52+00:00): Since were looking at Google rn (and not editing) it doesn't look like a hgv could be fueled here
fortera_au (2025-08-26 07:42:06+00:00): That's not the only tag I'm concerned about, plus the HGV tag is about whether they're allowed there or not. 

Did you verify that each of these stations does not allow HGVs to enter, and that they don't serve food at all? If not, you've done an automated edit without consultation and this should all be reverted.
user_22909869 (2025-08-26 07:44:17+00:00): https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/2207451

Oh, it's already changed multiple times since these questionable tags were added. The most recent one left a phone number, that seems unverifiable now since this isn't listed on the Ampol website. However I'm sure that you verified that when it changed. I'm starting to thing you're right, it might be Ugo. It is listed there, but without a phone number. https://www.ugoselfserve.com.au/find-ugo
user_22909869 (2025-08-26 07:47:21+00:00): This wasn't automated.
fortera_au (2025-08-26 07:49:10+00:00): How did you verify that this petrol station doesn't serve food and that HGVs are not permitted to enter, outside of the existing amenity:restaurant and amenity:truck_stop tags? Because if all you did was search and replace those tags, that's explicitly listed as an automated edit.
fortera_au (2025-08-26 07:50:25+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct for more information.

If those changes weren't verified in some way, these changesets should be reverted for breach of AECOC.
user_22909869 (2025-08-26 07:53:46+00:00): I've removed all the old tags in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171012968 they are from atleast 2012, but seem to have been an undocumented import before then. 2012 seems to be when the redaction happened.
fortera_au (2025-08-26 07:58:24+00:00): Can you also make sure that this is done for all the other edits you've done alongside this as well. 

Those edits are so far back that we can't know for sure what the source was, but if they've remained in OSM, then there's a decent chance they're valid. 

Please don't do any more find and replace edits like this without discussion, as per the automated edits code of conduct. Even if you're manually doing it, it still counts, and that discussion would have ensured that the correct replacement tags were found.
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:09:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 171050988 where the changeset comment is: Revert invalid automated tag change
TrickyFoxy (2025-09-01 11:18:07+00:00): Может «Сад 61 69» в loc_name/alt_name?
Stalker61 (2025-09-01 12:21:29+00:00): Может. В конце октября буду в Хантах и посмотрю на месте.
TrickyFoxy (2025-09-01 12:24:36+00:00): так это, панормы ж есть. Даже этого года https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CLECVJPW
Stalker61 (2025-09-01 13:06:14+00:00): 61.01061, 69.018745
Это кооинаты обьекта если что. name как-то неуместно.
frodrigo (2025-09-06 12:16:44+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/77431268
J'ai une doute sur cette modification et en particulier le tag motor_vehicle=designated

La section entre les deux feux est-elle ouverte à la circulation générale / voiture, ou reservé aux bus ?
Lyon-St-Clair (2025-09-07 20:50:39+00:00): Réservée aux bus de la ligne C1, cette voie a été créée exprès pour.
frodrigo (2025-09-08 09:52:59+00:00): Merci. J'ai corrigé les tags.
YuliyaSurta (2025-08-25 15:19:51+00:00): Added missing road according to Esri World Imagery #mapbox_missing_roads
pb-mapping (2025-08-25 16:19:11+00:00): I forgot to add my source and source URL to the changeset but this map was found at: 

https://web.archive.org/web/20220311143149/http://www.msh.state.ms.us/CampusMap/Map_11x17_vert.pdf
aaru_swartz (2025-09-28 08:58:54+00:00): added this by mistake. this police station doesnt exist at this side of the road.
ika-chan! (2025-08-25 16:22:13+00:00): Hello, I need to advise that you need to leave better changeset comments than just random letters, because without one people will have to guess what you were changing, and then there would be an increased risk of people mistaking your changesets for a bad edit. The latter is because we recently dealt with a different user who made bad or fictional edits, and evaded blocks and questions from the community by using many sockpuppet accounts.
thanasis (2025-08-26 07:11:37+00:00): You are right. I systematically do minor addition and edits on footpaths and dirt roads, that the commending feels trivial. I will try to change that.
notmyproblem1 (2025-08-25 16:52:34+00:00): Fermati, queste modifiche sono vandaliche.
reganfreeman (2026-07-08 13:39:14+00:00): Thanks for doing this! just an fyi -- changing the type of path near 650 Lincoln broke Strava wayfinding for bikes. fixed back.
SafwatHalaby (2025-08-25 15:51:38+00:00): All bicycle singles in the area are practically the same - de facto heavily used by bicycles. The distinctions on the map were all arbitrary and have nothing to do with any ground truth. I have normalized it all to `highway=path, bicycle=designated`. I have not touched `foot=` access tags wherever they are present. I have removed `access=destination` since it makes no sense in this context.

It is possible to argue that `bicycle=yes` is more proper since there is no official legal signage the designates this to cyclers, but I think it's slightly safer for pedestrian routing to go for `bicycle=designated`. I do not mind it either way if anyone would prefer that, but I do mind the arbitrary inconsistencies that were present
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-25 17:22:55+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1424831941

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-08-25 19:32:18+00:00): naprawione
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-08-25 16:31:03+00:00): Hello. Why did you delete the name tags and admin_level=4 tag? (You have added these tags in the past.)
L'imaginaire (2025-08-25 20:02:24+00:00): 🥳
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-26 12:55:00+00:00): Z tego co widze to wojna edycyjna się w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165439473 zaczeła - czy ta zmiana była na forum omawiana?
pavvv (2025-08-29 10:34:12+00:00): Nie była, gdyż osoby spoza Wrocławia nie będą wiedzieć, o funkcjach tych dróg. Edycje były przeprowadzane w tej sposób, że jeżeli marafowi lub innemu wrocławskiemu mapperowi się one nie spodobają, to możemy je przedyskutować i według tego zadecydować, czy droga powinna mieć tę kategorię czy nie. W przypadku tego odcinka edycja naprawdę mu się nie podoba, lecz jego argumenty do mnie nie przemawiają, a on zdaje się nie rozumieć moich. Jeżeli sprawa dalej będzie się ciągnąć, to możemy ją omówić na forum. Akurat kolejne propozycje edycji tam umieściłem.
Andrea Musuruane (2025-08-27 15:48:08+00:00): Ciao. Qui hai inserito solo una linea. Non è una strada finché non la etichetti opportunamente. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170985976
bartpio (2025-08-25 16:27:29+00:00): revert leaf types. did not actually survey this area
user_5359 (2025-08-26 10:12:31+00:00): Hello! What is the mean of the tag c=yes?
Enillopa (2025-08-26 11:41:32+00:00): Hello ! 
It was already there before my modification, I just added the information about the cyclepath.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-25 17:22:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413129987

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Andrea Musuruane (2025-08-27 15:42:42+00:00): Ciao. In Italia i numeri civici non vanno mai messi sugli edifici. Il numero civico è il numero che contraddistingue l'accesso esterno che dall’area di circolazione (strada, piazza, via, ecc) immette direttamente o indirettamente alle unità immobiliari (abitazioni, esercizi commerciali, uffici, garage, ecc.) o alle aree recintate non edificate (es. stabilimenti balneari). Non è quindi corretto associare i tag addr:* a un edificio. Bisogna quindi inserire un nodo in corrispondenza dell'ingresso dove si trova la targhetta ed etichettalo opportunamente. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170986888
Yog Sot (2025-08-25 19:50:52+00:00): ej, ty tak na poważnie zmieniłeś na zakaz ruchu pieszego na drodze w strefie zamieszkania?
azalizh (2025-08-25 21:19:47+00:00): Wiem, że to dziwne ale tak tam jest postawiony znak B-41 od góry i od dołu na tym odcinku. A strefa jest odwołana później (Inflancka 43). Może zaznaczyć jednak inaczej, ale prawnie tam jest strefa zamieszkania ;)
Yog Sot (2025-08-25 22:27:26+00:00): B-41 obowiązuje tylko po tej stronie drogi przy której został ustawiony, a więc musiały by stać dwa znaki na wejściu z każdej strony. 
OSM nie pozwala na mapowanie takiego warunkowego zakazu accessem w zal od strony drogi, więc najlepiej jak zdejmiesz ten absurdalny zakaz ;} Ewentualnie zapraszam do dyskusji na discorda
Yog Sot (2025-08-27 20:28:27+00:00): zmieniłem tag na inny ;}
azalizh (2025-08-30 08:57:25+00:00): Dziękuję.
bxl-forever (2025-08-25 18:24:39+00:00): Bonjour,

La rue est dans une zone de rencontre. La loi belge implique une vitesse plus basse, 20 km/h avec ce panneau.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1049686543433949

Votre changement sera effacé.
Colbertson (2025-08-25 17:23:44+00:00): someone pls re-import those nature reserves so they arent glued to everything
b-jazz (2025-08-29 03:59:56+00:00): FYI, I fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1424842363

Golf holes need to start at the tee and end at the green. You had it backwards. Common mistake. Just thought you might want to know.
trial (2026-07-07 20:13:08+00:00): Salut, je vois que sur Brest Gare Routière tu as supprimé des ref, ce sont les numéros des arrêts sur le terrain (et les route_ref les lignes affichées sur le panneau).
mga_geo (2026-07-09 04:53:34+00:00): Bonjour,
Oui j'ai effectué un gros nettoyage sur les attributs des arrêts suite à des ajouts parasites.
Je me suis donc loupé pour les ref sur Brest. Pour les route_ref, sur Rennes, c'est assez volatile: je préfère les supprimer plutôt que d'avoir une version périmée.
Je vais essayer de trouver un plan de la gare routière de Brest pour remettre les ref.
Cela sera peut-être qu'à la rentrée car je vais bientôt être occupé par les petits-enfants.
Marc
trial (2026-07-09 06:42:48+00:00): @josmougn a je crois commencé à remettre les ref, je lui ai dit que je voyais avec toi. 
J'ai déjà démandé à MapBox de restaurer avant leur boulette et ça a été fait.
Les notes correspondent aux ref relevées sur place il y a quelques mois et @josmougn fréquente cette gare routière, donc si tu as des questions sur le coin...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11677230942
Hufkratzer (2025-08-25 20:21:33+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1424845080 ist keine Reitanlage sondern ein Reitplatz. Wir hatten so einen Fall schon mal, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138536097
mappy123 (2025-08-26 19:40:33+00:00): So ein großer Änderungsatz und dann als Text nur "Neubaugebiet Holunderflosse Korbach auf aktuellen Stand gebracht ", was heißt aktuellen Stand? Alle Hydranten drin? Alle Kerbs drin für Blinde und Menschen mit Einschränkungen? Solche Änderungsätzte sollte man besser in kleiner aufteile so dass man sprechende Kurztexte geben kann. FInd ich sehr schade, da es vieles später viel schlechter nachvollziehbar macht und auch hier und jetzt die Arbeit der QS erschwert.
silversurfer83 (2025-08-26 19:49:40+00:00): 😘
silversurfer83 (2025-08-25 19:48:04+00:00): Hi :)

auch wenn es technisch gut möglich ist eine Adresse aus dem Umriss auf den POI zu berechnen ist es trotzdem ok und nicht unüblich einem POI die volle Adresse aus Str., HsNr, PLZ und Ort zu geben. Auch wenn das dazu führt, dass eine Adresse in der Suche mehrfach auftaucht, so ist es doch für viele Anwendungen wesentlich einfacher.

Happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170990084
cuzi (2025-10-06 14:47:31+00:00): Hi, an anonymous user created a note about the spaceports you added in this area, saying they weren't spaceports: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4992797
kagebar (2025-08-26 05:35:41+00:00): та ви ж нічого не змінили, просто перемістили точку трохи далі. Я відєдную альтанку від стежки, якщо вона з іншого боку стежки, перемістіть.
kagebar (2025-08-26 05:42:05+00:00): також зверніть увагу, що якщо це бесідка для пікніків, то правильно тегувати shelter_type=picnic_shelter а не shelter_type=gazebo (це трохи інше https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0 )
osmmapper222 (2025-08-25 18:22:26+00:00): eine waldbühne nicht ergänzt wurden. die hat sich einem vergangenen changeset titel eingeschlichen
Đuro Jiří (2025-08-29 16:46:55+00:00): Questo tag si utilizza più per "negozi cinesi".
jioele (2025-08-29 17:50:19+00:00): 👍
rskedgell (2025-08-26 15:25:28+00:00): Thanks for updating this, but please use access=private for this rather than access=no. They're not synonyms and access=no on its own means nobody can use it unless it's overridden by other access tags.
literan (2025-09-06 11:15:23+00:00): только слово ГБОУ лишнее. Это название юр лица, можно в тег operator. Поправлю.
AndyB_66 (2025-12-22 14:20:49+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
rempshaener (2025-09-01 18:47:16+00:00): Hallo,
das Feld „information“ ist für derartige Daten nicht gedacht.
Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:information?uselang=de
Die Daten müssen auf jeden Fall geändert werden.
Wenn es unbedingt sein muss, können derartige Daten in „description“ aufgenommen werden. 
Gleichzeitig möchte ich dafür werben, die Adressfragmente vollständig außen vor zu lassen; bislang hat sich noch niemand gefunden, der einen echten Anwendungsfall für diese Daten nennen konnte.
Viele Grüße
Feuerwehr Kirchdorf (2025-09-02 07:57:17+00:00): wir benötigen diese Info für unsere Hydrantenpläne welche im Einsatz verwendet werden