piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hendrik Helsper (2026-02-17 13:26:56+00:00): Also wenn du Adressen in Gebieten einträgst, wo die meisten noch fehlen, hab ich dagegen nichts. Wenn es so aussieht, als sei dort schon erkundet worden, dann wäre ich wie gesagt vorsichtig. Es kann ja auch sein, dass es eine Hausnummer die im Alkis ist, vor ort nicht gibt. Das kommt bei mir in der Gegend häufiger vor.

Es kann schon sein, dass das ALKIS tagesaktuell ist, aber trotzdem können die Daten veraltet sein, weil die Daten ja nur nicht die Realität abbilden, sondern eine behördliche Fiktion. Wenn z.B ein großes Gebäude mehrere Hausnummern hat, aber nur eine davon tatsächlich ausgezeichnet ist und genutzt wird.

Ich hab nur gefragt, weil deine Changeset-Gebiete ziemlich groß sind und ich nicht so leicht überblicken konnte, wo du überall Hausnummern eingetragen hast. Aber grundsätzlich sind die Alkis-Daten schon mal eine Verbesserung ggü. gar keinen Hausnummern in einem Gebiet. 

Insofern weiterhin frohes Mappen!
Hendrik Helsper (2026-02-17 13:29:45+00:00): Ich korrigiere mich: es war nur dieses eine Changeset, das so groß ist.
sembelst134 (2026-02-13 08:12:58+00:00): Hallo, ich habe Rückfragen zu den neuen Ladesäulen.
- sind es 3 oder 4 Säulen, da du socket:type2_combo auf 8 erhöht hast aber capacity auf 6 gelassen hast? NLaktuell schreibt von 8, aber zB in EnBW mobility-App tauchen nur 6 auf (DE*ELI*E3603116 und DE*ELI*E3603117 fehlen)
- woher kommen die 500A@1000V, das würde ja 500kW bedeuten oder soll das nur den Rahmen der Möglichkeiten wegen CC-CV Ladekurve darstellen?
- warum wurde mein fixme gelöscht, die Station mit vermeintlich 8 Plätzen nimmt ja schon etwas Platz ein und könnte mit aktualisierten Luftbildern gemäß Wiki besser als Fläche mit einzelnen Ladepunkten für die Säulen und deren ref:EU:EVSE eingezeichnet werden
Danny83 (2026-02-16 07:00:35+00:00): Hallo @sembelst134, vielen Dank für den Rückfrage. Ich habe die Infos sowie die Position von GoingElectric entnommen. https://www.goingelectric.de/stromtankstellen/Deutschland/Senftenberg/Parkplatz-Neumarkt-Am-Neumarkt-9/105100/
Gerne kann der Ladepark auch als Fläche mit einzelnen Ladepunkten/-Säulen gemappt werden.
NeisBot (2026-02-11 08:48:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13523785789 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Spa facility"
---
على سبيل المثال ، يمكن أن تكون نسخة أكثر محايدة ومنصفة من نصك هي: "مرافق السبا"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-20 05:34:03+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178395839
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-22 12:44:27+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440906194/history has addr:housename = 289 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here - was it supposed to be addr:housenumber= ?
gscholz (2026-02-16 08:59:43+00:00): Hi Gervas0411,
this changeset has creates errors regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=31.54533&lat=4.81498&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=178395314

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
habi (2026-02-11 09:02:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5163169
mga_geo (2026-02-24 06:14:32+00:00): Bonjour,
La valeur de l'attribut network est bien BREIZHGO_CAR_29.
Pour les réseaux départementaux gérés par la région, cet attribut reflète le mode de gestion.
Pouvez-vous arrêter de le modifier ?
Marc
Plumf (2026-02-24 07:43:34+00:00): Sans problèmes, cependant Osmose & l'editeur en ligne OSM indique que c'est une erreur ? Est ce que vous avez une explication ?
mga_geo (2026-02-24 08:43:49+00:00): L'erreur osmose est lié à la différence de valeur entre route et route_master.
Pour iD, les valeurs sont suggérées par NSI et ne prennent en compte que partiellement le contexte local, et il y a en plus des guerres de chapelle.
NeisBot (2026-02-11 09:12:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13523785789 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Massage center"
---
على سبيل المثال ، يمكن أن تكون نسخة أكثر محايدة ومنصفة من نصك هي: "مركز التدليك"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-20 05:34:05+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178802668
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
eggie (2026-02-11 10:09:15+00:00): Dag dpasn Deze vermelding staat toch al op de kaart. waarom nog een keer?
De email adressen verschillen wel.
In postcode hoort geen spatie. 
Beter samenvoegen en voor een eenduidige email zorgen.

MVG
eggie


MVG
eggie
dpasn (2026-02-11 10:19:39+00:00): Goedemorgen eggie, yes dat klopt maar had hem nu toegevoegd via Comaps omdat hij daar niet op de kaart staat. Geloof dat Comaps maar 1/2 keer per maand word geupdate. Daarnaast maak ik ook gebruik van opencollective.com en daar word hij ook niet weergegeven.
eggie (2026-02-11 10:23:27+00:00): Oke.. maar in de data van osm staat het gebeuren nu 2x en in Comaps en evt andere apps. na periodieke update dus ook.
Dus svp verwijderen.

Mvg..
eggie
eggie (2026-02-11 12:19:28+00:00): Open Source is geen valide key..
Je zou evt description=....  kunnen gebruiken. 
Gr eggie
NeisBot (2026-02-11 09:30:21+00:00): Hi Eldarado, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 93% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 10 highway(s)
- 1 surface(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178396605
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-11 09:35:11+00:00): Looks good. Thank you.
silversurfer83 (2026-02-11 15:46:24+00:00): Hi :)

warum hast du denn den "Haupttag" am Standort Söhrenwald entfernt? Also das office=company
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178397184
LBis (2026-02-14 12:20:27+00:00): Der Firmeneintrag (Knoten) sollte noch vorhanden sein und auf die Alfred Schneider GmbH u. Co KG verweisen.

Das heißt aber nicht zwangsläufig, dass das Gebäude auch dem Unternehmen oder wie bei anderen Unternehmen auch in eine separate Immobiliengesellschaft ausgelagert ist. 

Daher: Knoten mit Firmenname, Gebäude ohne Firmenname, um nicht etwas zu bestätigen, was ich nicht genau weiß.
NeisBot (2026-02-11 09:45:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/431386224 v6

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Hotel suites"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-20 05:34:05+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178789131
eggie (2026-02-11 10:01:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  .. Als je goed kijkt zie je dat het parkeerterrein al op de kaart staat als vlak. Ik heb de overbodige bijdrage verwijderd.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
cuzi (2026-02-11 13:32:53+00:00): Ich habe deine Änderung rückgängig gemacht. Der iD Editor ist nicht zum Testen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178407243
Naundorfer (2026-02-23 06:55:05+00:00): Der nächste Abschnitt zum Schneider-Weg musste von den Waldeigentümern aufwändig "rückgebaut" werden.
Dieser Abschnitt ist ebenfalls stark erodiert. Das ist alles eine negative Folge des ungeregelten Begängnisses und das zu Teilen LRT des FFH-Gebiets. Es handelt sich zudem um eine Sackgasse. Letztendlich gehört dieser Bereich eigentlich nach §13 LWaldG zum Schutz vor erheblichen Schäden geschützt.
Auf die Vor-Ort-Kenntnis sollte gehört werden. Stattdessen reagiert man lieber mit Sperren, das spricht sehr für  offene Gemeinschaft und Projekt!
NeisBot (2026-02-11 10:03:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11076542880 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Medical clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-20 05:34:06+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178442278
wireguy (2026-02-11 21:07:19+00:00): Len, fyi, updated the hour to the correct format, and expanded the street name abbreviation.  Welcome to osm, and I really like your mailbox ;-)
eggie (2026-02-11 10:36:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-02-11 10:30:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 15 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1476380313 v3 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1476401987 v2 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13542548611 v2
https://osm.org/node/13542548612 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178399260
NeisBot (2026-02-11 11:09:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 24 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/977944089 v4 | 21 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1323714785 v1 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/9048980023 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178401080
NeisReview (2026-02-20 05:34:13+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178457796
NeisBot (2026-02-11 11:12:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13529698600 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Lockers para equipaje y bicicletas"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Lockers para equipaje y bicicletas"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-20 05:34:08+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178802669
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
Rainero (2026-03-15 22:04:46+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179919234
(unzulässige Quelle)
NeisBot (2026-02-11 11:18:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/818779914 v8

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Ophthalmology clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
BCNorwich (2026-02-11 16:21:46+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfurtunately your changes to a highway and a hospital outline have resulted in the corruption of the existing data. Thus, to reinstate the original data, I've reverted these changes.

I think you have a private clinic at the Royal Free Hospital. This would be a valid feature to map as a POI node.

Need any help please just ask
Regards Bernard.
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-11 16:36:11+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178414301

Thanks, Bernard
rskedgell (2026-02-12 15:56:42+00:00): @pitscheplatsch I've seen four edits like this, two of which overwrote the tags of place=* nodes. I'm inclined to suspect it's some sort of marketer providing a very low-quality advertising/SEO/spam service to private consultants for a fee (for which they should demand a refund). I've let DWG know in case there's more of this.
mueschel (2026-02-19 13:04:12+00:00): Hi,
is this really "cql_location" and not "cqc_location"?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13542983926#map=19/50.714775/-3.544917&layers=N
Adrian Shobrooke (2026-02-19 19:45:54+00:00): Hi @mueschel. Yes, now corrected, thank you.

Adrian
Alexb60 (2026-04-03 15:08:31+00:00): Bonjour,

Vous avez retracé la voie des Quais à Pondereux Ouest (1453829211) en indiquant utiliser une source datant de 2024. Cette ligne a été déferrée en 2025 dans le cadre des travaux d'extension du bassin de l'Atlantique. Elle n'existe donc plus tout comme les supports caténaires qui vont avec.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-13 03:22:47+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13543031701

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
chnuessli (2026-02-16 06:53:20+00:00): Hoi captain_slow
Wurden da absichtlich auch andere nodes wie z.B Defis entfernt? Oder wurden die wieder neu gemappt?
captain_slow (2026-02-16 07:09:40+00:00): Hallo chnuessli
Den Defi mitten im Feld hatte ich tatsächlich absichtlich entfernt, da es ein doppelter Eintrag des Defis https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11037783605/ zu sein schein.
chnuessli (2026-02-16 07:11:29+00:00): Ah stimmt, gut gesehen. Merci :)
Taya_S (2026-02-12 12:42:57+00:00): Reverted data imported from Google

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178456174
eggie (2026-02-11 12:17:30+00:00): Dag Dirk,

De twee winkels heb ik op het gebouw gezet. Door de schuin genomen luchtfoto krijg je vertekening van de positie van het gebouw. 

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2026-02-11 11:51:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13543061924 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Law office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-20 05:34:10+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178802671
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
Piskvor (2026-02-12 13:54:04+00:00): Zdravím, 

Building type ani RÚIAN id nemají s velvyslanectvím nic společného. To je asi nějaký omyl? 

S pozdravem, 
Piškvor
Piskvor (2026-03-18 13:07:25+00:00): RÚIAN id nesouvisí s velvyslanectvím

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180058978
Strongthany (2026-03-04 18:20:19+00:00): Thank you for fixing that! Very dumb mistake on my part, was high.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-01 01:15:14+00:00): Hi,

If you're going to add businesses to OSM for your clients, you have an obligation (to both your client and to us) to at least make every reasonable effort to use correct tags and values. Most of the tags added here are used incorrectly (addr:city=*, addr:street=*, cuisine=*, opening_hours=*, payment=*, phone=*, website=*) , many of them being essentially nonsense, which both pollutes the map with junk data and means they will not be intelligible to data consumers reading the map, defeating the purpose of your efforts here.

It's really not _that_ hard to use iD's beginner-friendly presets to fill in this information correctly, or spend a few minutes reading the wiki on how to format your tags properly. After all, you are being _paid_ to do this properly for your client. As it stands, given the mostly nonsensical tagging and violation of OSM policies on spam, it is your responsibility to fix this.

Thanks.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-01 01:18:34+00:00): Revert due to mostly nonsensical tags added by a known SEO spam account.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182054914
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-30 09:03:19+00:00): Does this niche travel agency really occupy the entirety of this four storey building, such that the entire building is named after it?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-03 21:11:46+00:00): Given the lack of any response, I removed the apparent SEO spam travel agency name (with no tags) from the entire 4 story building in changeset 183614279

https://osm.org/changeset/183614279

If valid, it should be added as a separate POI with appropriate tags.
habi (2026-02-12 15:35:29+00:00): Ciao Consti Pixel

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.
Dass du hier die Details der Geleise im Bau erfasst hast, ist prima (nur stellt sich die Frage, woher du die Informationen hast).

Gemäss https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name ist aber `name=Zukunft Bahnhof Bern` falsch, Geleise (im Bau) haben in OpenStreetMap keinen Namen.
Ich habe die Namen in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178463647 entfernt.
Dass es um die Zukunft des Bahnhofs Bern geht ist ja in `tunnel:name=RBS Tiefbahnhof` und `tunnel:name=Zufahrtstunnel Zukunft Bahnhof Bern` drin...

Gruss,
Habi

PS: Bei irgendwelchen Fragen gerne hier in den Kommentaren nachhaken oder bei https://c.osm.org/c/107 eine Diskussion eröffnen, wir versuchen gerne zu helfen
eggie (2026-02-11 15:13:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-02-11 12:26:20+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (3 changesets) shows that 347 of your last 353 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23778094
gabro00 (2026-02-11 17:19:19+00:00): Szia! Ha csak házszámozol, vannak érdekes célszerszámok telefonra, pl:
- https://streetcomplete.app/
- https://every-door.app/
zsoooc (2026-02-13 08:23:46+00:00): Szia!
Köszi, ki fogom próbálni.
LordGarySugar (2026-02-16 23:21:10+00:00): I have restored the grass and trees that you deleted - please don't remove things unless they have been removed, it's hard to know what your intentions were in this changeset because of the short changeset comment. It's also not appropriate to addd 'out of date food' to the name of a shop.
Baloo Uriza (2026-02-11 14:06:43+00:00): In a lot of these cases, just adding parking=street_side would have been a faster fix.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178405177
IreuN (2026-04-06 11:43:33+00:00): Cześć! Czy mógłbyś poprawić swoje zmiany? Przy skrzyżowaniu Ojcowska/Olkuska dodałeś aż 6 sygnalizacji i jest to najprawdopodobniej błędne ;)

Sugeruję dodać `highway=traffic_signals` tylko i wyłącznie w miejscu zatrzymania pojazdów, a jeśli to droga dwukierunkowa to dodaj też `traffic_signals:direction=forward/backward` żeby zasygnalizować w którym kierunku sygnalizacja działa.
YomanNH (2026-04-08 12:00:01+00:00): To jest tego typu użytkownik, jakich wiele w całej Polsce, tzw. "student". Jedna edycja, fikcyjne zmiany. Można całość wycofać.
YomanNH (2026-04-08 12:01:09+00:00): Ten akurat ma dwie edycje, ale mapę traktuje jak wizję "tak bym chciał, żeby było"...
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-08 15:43:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181056882 - wycofane jako wandalizm i łamanie https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
NeisBot (2026-02-11 13:54:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/671280678 v6

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Urology clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
rskedgell (2026-02-12 13:43:44+00:00): (Review requested)

Please don't overwrite the tags of existing objects, as destroying information to promote your practice is extremely unhelpful.

I've restored the building's original tags and moved your details to a new POI in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178458722
rskedgell (2026-02-13 18:30:30+00:00): Also, Mr Sachin Malde would do well to read the GMC guidance: https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/using-social-media-as-a-medical-professional/using-social-media-as-a-medical-professional
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-13 18:34:57+00:00): And spammy description has been removed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178413184
Udarian (2026-02-11 17:44:13+00:00): this changeset does not have a comment, comments are important for various reasons. Next time please leave a changeset comment describing what you did. for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Happy mapping,
Udar.