piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-02 22:42:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3319898926
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3319898899
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1434938651
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1434938652
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1434938653

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rskedgell (2026-03-25 08:34:15+00:00): Adding a separate (and entirely fictitious) guided busway where most of the extent is a physically unsegregated bus lane is unacceptable mapping for the renderer. Please stop it.
eggie (2025-10-02 21:13:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Nieuwbouw kun je via het forum laten importeren middels het draadje BAG importverzoeken.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Eren00 (2025-10-02 21:13:28+00:00): Sivas'a yaptığınız değişiklik için sizi tebrik etmek isterim hocam. 👏🏻 Katkılarınızın devamını ümit ediyorum.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-02 22:42:38+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1079883067

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
syntex (2025-10-03 00:22:10+00:00): Poprawiłem
Baloo Uriza (2025-10-07 16:26:55+00:00): Not sure how 76th got deleted but I went and re-added it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172766139
Manuel H (2026-04-04 11:07:48+00:00): Hallo,
hat https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/134789734 einen historischen Wert? Wenn nicht, dann bitte 'historic' entfernen.
s. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:historic

MFG,
Manuel
silversurfer83 (2025-10-03 07:13:48+00:00): Hi there :)

not sure the relation type should be "boundary".

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172766363
ElliottPlack (2025-10-03 17:51:40+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contribution. You are correct that “America” is often used to refer to both North America and South America. However, in OpenStreetMap we don’t map continents this way:

* A continent is not a `type=boundary`. Boundaries in OSM are for things like administrative areas or protected regions, and they require polygons, not points.  
* Points cannot form a valid boundary relation.  
* It is also inappropriate to tag this as `place=continent` that tag is reserved for established continent features already agreed upon in OSM.  
* We do not map entire continents as single polygon boundaries. That only adds unneeded complexity to the database.

Because of this, I will revert this changeset.  

If you would like to discuss how continents or other large geographic concepts are represented in OSM, please contact the Data Working Group at **data@openstreetmap.org** with subject **#2025100310000204**.

Thanks for your understanding.  

-- Elliott Plack  
OSMF Data Working Group
EP_Repair (2025-10-03 17:54:32+00:00): reverted via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172803828
Lytter1 (2025-10-02 21:20:59+00:00): Skulle stå Hjallerup
Linus W Frische (2025-10-02 21:25:01+00:00): Ikke restaurant, men en bydel i Aalborg :P
user_5359 (2025-10-03 07:20:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add two ALPR camera near by. Is this one or two objects?
Small hints: 
Surveillance cameras are rarely road junctions because they are usually mounted next to the road.

Surveillance cameras do not have names, only reference designations. This is particularly true when ALPR or other functional descriptions are hidden in names.

Please adhere to the value range of the keys (here direction=14050320).
Tewuzij (2025-10-02 22:06:21+00:00): Total changes: 51
citrula (2025-10-02 22:06:34+00:00): source tags carried from previous edit, sorry!
NieWnen (2026-05-25 14:29:22+00:00): Cześć, 
dlaczego usunąłeś ścieżkę https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/786491711 ?

Ogólnie takie nielegalne przejścia mapujemy z odpowiednimi accessami, m.in. po to, żeby nie zostały błędnie dodane bez nich :)

Choć w tym przypadku jest to niestety dość popularne nielegalne przejście z wiedzy lokalnej i orto :P
Anas masuris (2026-05-25 17:40:23+00:00): Taka moja mania bezpieczeństwa, miałem już przywrócić ścieżkę, ale mnie uprzedziłeś xd
NieWnen (2026-07-03 17:16:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9934130602

5-komorowa sygnalizacja już stoi, ale nieaktywna z krzyżykiem póki co.

Tego jakby za bardzo nie pilnuję, bo to mocno kolejowe rzeczy, ale daję znać :P
Anas masuris (2026-07-03 17:20:38+00:00): Dzięki :) Zapiszę sobie do kajecika
user_5359 (2025-10-03 07:05:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your stor inside of a building.
jptolosa (2025-10-02 23:58:48+00:00): Hola, esto es principalmente sedimento (natural=scree). Para el polígono de agua del río se debería utilizar como referencia el nivel normal del río.
Saludos.
victorelgueta (2025-10-03 00:06:50+00:00): Vale perfecto.
victorelgueta (2025-10-03 00:23:32+00:00): Hola, Revisé y no me parece scree, además el río en crecida ha llegado hasta ahí.
victorelgueta (2025-10-03 00:26:03+00:00): scree me parece mas de orilla de montaña, riverbank podría ser pero entiendo que ya no se usa.
jptolosa (2025-10-03 01:31:27+00:00): Perdón, el tag es natural=shingle
jptolosa (2025-10-03 01:33:00+00:00): En OSM mapeamos el nivel de los ríos bajo condiciones meteorológicas normales, no su nivel máximo.
jptolosa (2025-10-03 01:34:33+00:00): Pero acá hay una guía para saber dónde fijar el límite, pero al final es más o menos lo que muestra la imagen satelital: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rivers#Varying_water_level_river
victorelgueta (2025-10-03 10:12:02+00:00): vale muchas gracias!
OddlyAngled (2025-10-13 19:07:04+00:00): rangers stations near the PCT don't need to be included in the PCT relation - it's for the trail, trailheads, etc - I already removed it. thanks for the contributions!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172768510
Leporids (2025-10-13 19:12:21+00:00): Thanks for the help! Could you explain what the purpose of the relation is? I don't really understand them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172768510
OddlyAngled (2025-10-13 19:44:04+00:00): relations are collections of ways and/or nodes. hiking route relations are described here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking . for most trails they are a a collection of ways (segments really) that make up a named trail. we don't use them consistently in the Sierra and less frequently in Yosemite since most trails don't have names. there are trails like the Mist Trail that have names and a corresponding relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6451906 or others like the Forsyth Trail that have names but are missing a route relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131325321

generally speaking, they make it easy for apps and sites to find hiking trails and routes. sites like https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=12.0/38.0845/-119.5399 are purpose built for this.

when trails get really really long many tools start struggling to manage the size.. so now relations are capped to some number of members (like 2000-ish) but even that can get a bit unwieldy. so we break the big relations down into smaller ones. for the PCT the smaller relations are modeled after PCTA's section names. in this particular case CA section I extends from Tuolumne Meadows to Sonora Pass. see https://www.pcta.org/discover-the-trail/maps/overview-maps/ for more info.

the PCT sections are members of a superroute relation (a relation of relations) - this way we can still piece together the entire PCT - here it is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1225378
Leporids (2025-10-13 20:19:25+00:00): Thanks!
melaniya_lyft (2025-10-03 17:50:58+00:00): Hi MacLondon, 
My name is Melaniya, and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft.

In your changeset, you marked way 315269000 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315269000) as was:highway, which was the only way for buses and taxis to get to way 1434966835 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1434966835) due to this turn restriction r19258814 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19258814). 

Could you please verify if this turn restriction r19258814 is up-to-date? On Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=24388736367474565&focus=photo&lat=41.3809222&lng=2.1418528&z=17&x=0.50385334802273&y=0.47767490716932154&zoom=0) from August 2025, the turn from w129216259 to w1434966835 isn’t prohibited.

Best regards,
Melaniya
MacLondon (2025-10-04 01:57:11+00:00): Hi Melaniya, 
I've removed that turn restriction now.

I did witness bus 115 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3293394) turning that way on Thursday. 

Most buses and taxis now use https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/831157592.

Regards,
Mac
melaniya_lyft (2025-10-06 09:15:17+00:00): Thank you for your help!
Taya_S (2025-10-29 08:24:42+00:00): Reverted fictional places

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173916531
Taya_S (2025-10-29 08:24:43+00:00): Reverted fictional places

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173916531
Taya_S (2025-10-29 08:24:48+00:00): Reverted fictional places

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173916535
user_5359 (2025-10-03 06:59:29+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/13965498. This relation miss the role from.
söm4324 (2025-10-07 18:06:20+00:00): Hallo even666, was bedeutet denn "building:levels=1 OG"? Ist die Schule im 1. OG, oder hat das Gebäude ein Erdgeschoss und eine 1. OG?

Der Wert so wie er jetzt eingetragen ist, ist jedenfall ungültig. Erwartet wird eine ganze Zahl, die die Geschossanzahl des Gebäudes angibt.
söm4324 (2025-10-09 08:17:06+00:00): Hab die fehlerhafte Info erst einmal entfernt. Wenn du weißt, wie viele Etagen das Gebäude hat, sag Bescheid oder trag es gerne selber ein.
Baloo Uriza (2025-10-07 14:45:30+00:00): If you're really in the dark on how to classify something, highway=road works as "there's some kind of traversable way here but I can't tell/don't know what kind".
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172769066
Branko Kokanovic (2025-10-12 11:04:55+00:00): Ponovo smo ti izbrisali izmenu. Imao si dve blokade, samo trazimo da nam se javis, da se dogovorimo sto konstantno menjas ovo. Molim te nemoj bez konsultacija sa zajednicom.
--
We reverted your change again. You already had 2 blockades, we just want you to reach out to us, so we can understand what is going on and why you changing this. Please don't do this without consulting with community
Glassman (2025-10-03 23:19:26+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172769462
PcMouse1 (2025-10-03 01:14:15+00:00): Forgot to mention that the river centreline was realigned to match the new waterway geometry.
FajrAl (2025-10-05 10:06:12+00:00): Cara edit di OSM bukan seperti ini. Sebelumnya juga ada area perkiraan Ponpesnya, kenapa jadinya dihapus?
FajrAl (2025-10-05 10:12:37+00:00): sudah diperbaiki
smallCat (2025-10-03 10:50:15+00:00): Hello alkino, thank you for your edit. But actually, the AAAAA scenic spot  is "West Lake Cultural Landscape of Hangzhou", not the West Lake itself.
smallCat (2025-10-03 10:51:23+00:00): The West Lake Cultural Landscape of Hangzhou is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13164471
smallCat (2025-10-03 10:54:53+00:00): I have fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172784963
UW Amy Bordenave (2025-10-04 00:26:08+00:00): My apologies for the unnecessarily large bounding box for this changeset - an accidental and incorrect edit was made to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6449353 and I have fixed the mistake in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172812952
UW Amy Bordenave (2025-10-04 00:24:39+00:00): Note: This changeset introduced an error which has been corrected in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172812952
salma_ayman (2025-10-05 14:07:55+00:00): Hello Abdullah Al Werfalli,
Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. Could you please share the sources for the updates you've made in the following areas?
Examples:
 https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way344758002
 https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way118719066
 https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way118719070
 https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way118719069
 https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way118719072
 https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way1333463302
 https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way571838265
 https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way1348705952
 https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way1348705951
My latest imagery (dated 05/10/2025) shows that this location is still under construction.
Kind regards,
salma_ayman
Masyas (2025-10-18 08:37:14+00:00): 这是一个place=village地名，而不是地铁站名
旧加卷 (2026-05-16 01:51:32+00:00): 此变更集仅针对1个元素添加了2个标签，但足足有6个编辑问题可圈点：
1. 上海地铁21号线并无邓镇站
2. 你所更改的是地点而不是车站
3. 你添加了 name:en=* ，但没有添加本地语言 name:zh=*
4. name值半角左括号，全角右括号；name:en值全角左括号，半角右括号
5. “在建”属于描述性用语，不是名称的一部分
6. "Still"在此场景不适合出现
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182722339
NeisBot (2025-10-03 02:33:55+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
user_5359 (2025-10-03 06:53:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I reverted your SPAM entry on the street crossing.
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-03 12:47:59+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172774805

Thx user_5359
user_5359 (2025-10-03 06:51:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I reverted your SPAM entry on the street crossing.
MassCartog (2025-10-03 16:07:18+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. In this changeset you removed a bunch of building visible from many Aerial views. Could you explain why?

 Also, please leave helpful changeset comments:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
campbelltree (2025-10-04 05:46:28+00:00): I reverted this because the buildings are still visible in the Winter 2024 imagery.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172816602
MassCartog (2025-10-03 16:07:24+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. In this changeset you removed a bunch of building visible from many Aerial views. Could you explain why?

 Also, please leave helpful changeset comments:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
campbelltree (2025-10-04 05:46:29+00:00): I reverted this because the buildings are still visible in the Winter 2024 imagery.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172816602
MassCartog (2025-10-03 16:08:06+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM.  Could you explain what you did in this changeset?

please leave helpful changeset comments:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
campbelltree (2025-10-05 21:32:10+00:00): OSMCha can't display what the relation changes were; they also left a note that was just "Your note is public." Note 4988891
NeisBot (2025-10-03 03:45:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-03 12:46:44+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172774675
neuhausr (2025-10-23 19:56:46+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. When creating linear features like paths, please don't "retrace your steps". Instead, create new paths that attach to each other. Happy mapping!
user_5359 (2025-10-03 06:45:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/9860298397
 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
ilias_ (2025-10-03 09:06:17+00:00): You can use just name instead of name:en
Kovoschiz (2025-10-04 19:09:27+00:00): This is already added as `proposed:oneway=yes`
TheLNL (2026-02-28 09:27:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1435013052
looks more like abandoned pillars from some construction planned long ago than a highway currently under construction
uknown-gryphus (2026-03-11 05:35:35+00:00): The flyover was under construction, but as you noticed it has stalled. Not sure when they will pick up work again, but I think its fine to leave it as tagged for now
Viima (2025-10-16 16:10:39+00:00): Hei! Tervetuloa Openstreetmapiin.

Openstreetmapissa ei ole tapana poistaa oikeasti olemassa olevia asioita. Pihatie kaiketi on edelleen olemassa, joten palautin sen kartalle.

Ohjeita kartoittamiseen saat Openstreetmapin wikistä. Tervetuloa myös suomenkieliselle keskustelufoorumille.

wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fi:Aloittelijan_opas

community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/fi/67

Ystävällisin terveisin
Viima
aharvey (2025-11-06 00:22:32+00:00): Bing imagery here has an offset, which needs to be accounted for if mapping against it, this can be checked via the GPS traces layer. Furthermore I believe service=alley was correct per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=alley

due to this I've reverted this changeset.
GarliccBread1 (2025-10-24 23:41:48+00:00): Just wanted to comment: I reverted N Empire Rd and Bard Creek Rd Back to tertiary since both the county and my Public Works contact at the town of Empire classify these two main roads as arterial roads for the area, as they connect Bard Creek Valley/North Empire settlement to US 40.
Szymson (2025-10-03 14:58:37+00:00): Zapraszam do lektury:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/chce-dodac-swoja-firme-do-mapy-w-osm-watek-ogolny/135487
trial (2025-10-03 08:37:51+00:00): Salut, si je prends https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323881416, je vois agricultural=yes qui est en contradiction avec la note.
"Actuellement il n'y a aucun tag d'accès qui contraint les cyclistes ou piétons à emprunter cette route." une voie express est une route interdite aux piétons et cycles, et ici exceptionnellement autorisé aux tracteurs. Donc on a bien un tag explicite (motor_road=yes et agricultural=yes), je ne vois pas trop que dire de plus sur le pont de l'Iroise sidewalk=no ?
"Interdit à tout véhicules sauf ceux non autorisés sur voie express (qui peuvent emprunter le Pont de l'Iroise)"
Je vois ce que l'auteur a voulu dire mais il a dit le contraire.
"interdit à tout véhicule, sauf s'il ne peut emprunter le pont de l'Iroise" me semble plus simple et plus compréhensible.
Nzau (2025-10-30 15:42:27+00:00): Salut trial,
Je suis d'accord avec ta définition de la voie express. Mais le chemin que tu pointe est en highway=unclassified et non en highway=trunk (qui justifierait l'ajout de bicycle=yes).
highway=unclassified n'est par défaut pas interdite aux vélos : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway=unclassified?uselang=fr

D'ailleurs il faudrait mettre cette route en highway=living_street puisqu'il y a un panneau zone de rencontre : 
https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?background=streets&focus=pic&map=17/48.391336/-4.402876&pic=a56084eb-d1c5-43e2-99f5-2c7495b3411d&speed=250&theme=default&xyz=153.81/-3.02/30

Je vais essayer d'ajuster les tags.
Mais tout ça pour dire que bicycle=designated n'est pas utile ici ^^
Nzau (2025-10-30 15:44:48+00:00): Je viens de voir que highway=living_street est déjà correctement appliqué.
trial (2025-10-31 10:10:56+00:00): Attention, Panoramax date de 2024 donc avant les aménagements de 2025.
Pas sûr qu'il soit resté (c'est maintenant sauf erreur une piste cyclable bordée de trottoirs piétons.. voir bicycle=dismount d'après une photo - ce qui n'aurait aucun sens).

https://brest.fr/actualites/le-pont-albert-louppe-reserve-aux-cycles-et-pietons
https://www.letelegramme.fr/finistere/brest-29200/vieux-pont-de-plougastel-deux-associations-demandent-de-revoir-lamenagement-anti-voiturettes-6839913.php
trial (2025-10-31 10:14:49+00:00): je maintiens que agrucultural=yes et atv=yes sont faux.
Nzau (2025-12-07 20:52:29+00:00): N'hésitez pas à faire des modifs directement ^^
Britzz (2026-03-01 12:50:29+00:00): Bonjour, cette modification était fausse,  la rue Dénoyez est bien piétonne. Si vous vous basez sur des traces GPS, c'est une mauvaise indication (le trafic pour desservir la rue est autorisée mais la rue est néanmoins piétonne). "local knowledge of a colleague from field survey" : il s'est trompé, il faut faire plus attention : https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?s=fp;s2;p9e7f998e-da5b-4cbb-9ea9-17bc9dd3ccd7;c91.12/4.41/0;m17/48.872318/2.378162;bs
pitfire (2025-10-03 07:49:30+00:00): Hi Scooty66,
 Wilhelmstraße (141800900), v9 mit lanes=3 > lanes:backward=2 > lanes:forward=1 zusammen mit "oneway" ist nicht so ganz plausibel? Etwa gleiches gilt für  Wilhelmstraße (340151230), v5 

VG
Scooty66 (2025-10-03 08:11:32+00:00): Hi pitfire,
mmh, mir ist nicht bewußt an den Fahrspur-Tags etwas geändert haben, schlägt da ein Automatismus zu?
Zur Situation im südlichen Teil der Wilhelmstraße (141800900): Aktuell wegen Baustelle im anschließenden nördlichen Teil eine für Radfahrer freigegebene Einbahnstraße mit einer Fahrspur Richtung Norden (lanes:forward=1) und einer Fahrspur plus separate Abbiegespur (in die TG) nach Süden (lanes:backward=2). 
Im nördlichen Teil (340151230?) ebenso für Radfahrer freigegebene Einbahnstraße mit einer Fahrspur Richtung Norden (lanes:forward=1), die wegen Baustelle auf die nach Süden führende Fahrspur (lanes:backward=1, allerdings wegen Einbahnstraße aktuell nicht befahrbar) verschwenkt ist.
Die Baustelle wird wohl noch einige Monate dort sein,  vorrangig interessant dürfte eben die aktuelle Einbahnstraßenregelung sein, oder?
Was ist Deine Meinung dazu?
VG
pitfire (2025-10-03 09:11:54+00:00): Wir erfassen normalerweise keine temporäre Ereignisse die zeitlich begrenzt sind. Unsere Kartendaten werden von unzähligen Leuten heruntergeladen und dann wochen- oder monatelang offline auf verschiedensten Geräten verwendet. Damit OpenStreetMap-Daten sinnvoll offline verwendet werden können, sollte man erwarten, dass das Objekt in den nächsten paar Wochen nicht in der Realität verändert wird.
Zudem gibt es keinerlei Hinweise in Deinem Änderungssatz, der eine Wiedervorlage erfordern. Dies kann zu Folge haben, dass veränderte Routinginformationen über längere Zeit als Fehler unbeachtet bleiben.
VG
Scooty66 (2025-10-03 11:21:05+00:00): OK, danke für die Hinweise, habe nun alles wieder rückgängig gemacht.
bxl-forever (2025-10-03 13:51:40+00:00): The name of the street is "Ruelle de la Plaine": https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131633876

In this changeset, you modified a valid entry for the node into "addr:street"="Ruelle Plaine", which is incorrect and creates a mismatch.

It looks like you are mechanically importing whatever (unverified) data you have into your customer lists.

We would appreciate if you would train the staff behind this account about how OSM data is structured and how information should be mapped.
habi (2025-10-10 09:39:17+00:00): Ciao sandstorm
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4998830 mentions that there is *no* building here in construction.
Can you tell us more about the `knowledge`where you got the outline from?
Greetings,
habi
aharvey (2025-11-06 00:49:09+00:00): Bing imagery isn't aligned here, please check the GPS traces layer for alignment.