piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ovruni (2023-01-24 02:24:11+00:00): He dejado un mensaje en la lista de correos de la comunidad peruana sobre sus ediciones, donde puede participar también https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-pe/2023-January/000924.html
❤️‍🔥 (2023-01-24 06:50:06+00:00): Hi, please see comments at https://osm.org/changeset/131630301 - same thing for these two lines - they were separate because one had `lanes=1` and the other had `lanes=2`


Same with https://osm.org/changeset/131629529 - the tunnel had `maxheight=4.63` and `covered=yes`. now both features have `covered=no` and `maxheight=4.63` which doesn't seem right
SK53 (2023-01-24 14:15:24+00:00): You seem to have deleted information on at least one node, which was mapped as a maypole: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9973120591
silversurfer83 (2023-01-24 16:04:13+00:00): Please don't change tags without ensuring the correctness of your changes. Maypoles, for example, are a thing throughout Europe. Also, if you don't have streetside imagerie to confirm, don't change something just because it seems plausible to you. A fixme would be better in many cases.

Cheers
silversurfer83
SherbetS (2023-01-24 16:20:12+00:00): hello.

I have edited the object in question to use the correct tagging.

religious extremists have had these removed in my part of the US, so I had no idea there was a documented tag for them on the wiki.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmaypole

-SherbetS
silversurfer83 (2023-01-24 18:02:44+00:00): Hello SherbetS,

As you saw for yourself, it is even a documented tag. But even if it were not, deleting it in other places just because of religious beliefs which most of the world don't share ain't right. 
Should you encounter such edits or remember where they happened, please report them to the DWG (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group).

Regarding your edits: will you be so kind as to undo the damage yourself? Because if I were to do it, I'd simply revert your complete changes. 

Cheers
Silversurfer83
SherbetS (2023-01-24 18:14:38+00:00): Silversurfer83,

I did not mean to delete the data on this particular object. OSM is about what is on the ground, after all.

I have undone the damage on the object listed.
SomeoneElse (2023-01-24 22:10:36+00:00): I'm intrigued that religious extremists had those removed anywhere in the US!  I guess the original Wicker Man never got a release there either? :)
silversurfer83 (2023-01-24 22:13:41+00:00): @sherbetS thank you

keep those religious types in check ;)
❤️‍🔥 (2023-01-24 06:48:27+00:00): Hi, you've merged two sections of road which have different speed limits. In OSM it's common for roads (and roundabouts) to be split into many small segments, so that things like speed limits and bus routes can be accurately modelled.

https://osm.org/way/147615264 should have `maxspeed=50`, right?
mrpulley (2026-02-28 10:21:12+00:00): 4298725 maxspeed correct
1000969102 not checked
Baloo Uriza (2023-01-25 05:05:09+00:00): might have meant place=neighborhood?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131630495
soonerwxchaser (2023-01-25 18:35:51+00:00): I was just following the example below as place=neighborhood does not appear to have any symbology associated with it while landuse=residential does

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553373194
Baloo Uriza (2023-01-25 20:10:12+00:00): Different data consumers render things differently.  landuse=residential is for the actual landuse, which in these cases, crosses other land uses like landuse=highway not reflected in these polygons.
soonerwxchaser (2023-01-26 01:08:03+00:00): So does the majority of OKC and Edmond need to be re-done? I can add polygons for place=neighborhood and remove the landuse, but it would be inconsistent with the rest of the data in the region
Baloo Uriza (2023-01-26 01:14:55+00:00): Looks like it...but you're also not the only one to get a little confused by this (and would actually be the way to mark the boundary of an apartment complex, which would render on the map).

Take a look at Kendall-Whittier or the Blue Dome District for how to map neighborhoods; these also do render on the map at the boundary.
BPTT (2023-05-10 16:40:21+00:00): Hi there. I don't see any cycle tracks on S 17th Ave/Bike Route 17 in Street View. Do they exist in person? Are they very new? I didn't know the city was planning to build them.
Devdatta (2023-02-03 09:02:32+00:00): Hi Jeff!

I see that you have added dispute=yes here.

Is there any specific reason why you preferred that disputed=yes?
Devdatta (2023-02-03 09:06:34+00:00): Additionally, this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories) talks about tagging such boundaries with ) boundary=disputed + disputed=yes 

tagging these with boundary = administrative & adminlevel=2 is causing them be interpreted by most software to be authentic and accepted.
Jeff Underwood (2023-02-03 19:26:11+00:00): Hello,

No particular reason for 'dispute' over 'disputed'. The overall tag usage is fairly evenly split between them among the features I track, although 'disputed' is slightly more common. When I was actively working with these features, I just filtered for either tag so I don't have a preference either way really. Its certainly an inconsistency in the data that might be worth bulk updating some day.

Totally agree that boundary=disputed should be the tag for those segments. I should have made that fix when I added the dispute tag back. 

In any case, I've now updated the boundary type and changed the tag to disputed.

Thanks for flagging this!
-Jeff
Devdatta (2023-02-06 04:49:04+00:00): Thanks for changing the tags! 

I didn't want to change them myself, incase there was some specific reason for you having used these tags.

I'm relived to see that my understanding of the tags was correct, but I have posted this question on the OSM India Telegram group, just to be sure.
houtari (2023-01-24 04:17:36+00:00): lit=yes was an old description that got used by mistake. I intended to use "ojia" eg. "ditches" in english.
micholek (2023-03-27 14:33:01+00:00): Hi, why did you create a bicycle repair station if there's one already added there (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6773083685)? Btw, what is the source of data?
Cyclono (2023-03-27 16:12:51+00:00): Hello,

Maybe because there was non on my map?

Also if you look at the tags it says created by OsmAnd. So source is given, I walked there.

I think you should be more polite and be happy in trying to improve your map.
micholek (2023-03-27 17:03:22+00:00): Probably OsmAnd used outdated maps (although the bicycle repair station has been there for 6 months). Anyway, I think this change should be reverted.

Also, if you walked there, you should've added source=sourvey tag. created_by only tells what software was used to create a changeset.

I just asked two reasonable questions because you duplicated the POI and didn't provide the source of data. And, if anything, the map is ours, not mine ;).
Cyclono (2023-03-27 21:12:38+00:00): Hi,

I do thousands of edits, you are the first one asking for source. So I think I saved a lot of time.

If the source is osmand, it’s a mobile app, so it suggests that the person has been in that area.

I automatically assume source=survey when I see the app with other users.

I was in Poland 3-4 months, I downloaded the latest map when I arrived. So probably I downloaded the version before your update.

You don’t need to revert, just remove the duplicate
micholek (2023-03-27 21:42:29+00:00): Alright, I removed the duplicate. I'll keep your note about the source tag in mind. Thanks for helping out.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134195150
Cyclono (2023-03-27 22:30:23+00:00): Yes, thanks for correcting it.

I triple checked before I added it, there is one more bicycle repair station a bit more south west along the river. This one wasn’t on the map.

So it’s just bad luck for me

Welcome to openstreetmap by the way! Hope you like it
someperson (2023-01-24 18:47:07+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution!

Something to keep in mind is that data on OpenStreetMap uses standardized tags to make it easier for others to use. On the web editor you used, if you select the feature type "plumber", it will prompt you to fill in information like name, address, etc. It will automatically add the correct tag names, so you shouldn't label them yourself in this case.

I've gone ahead and converted the info you added to a valid format, and moved the location into the shopping center building since it looks like you put it in the parking lot. Feel free to move the location to where it actually is.
Z2U29JNLR4 (2023-01-24 06:01:13+00:00): Sure! I'll fix it.
4004 (2023-02-04 23:00:21+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132093202
zyxzyx (2023-01-24 09:27:27+00:00): この編集により、道路へ折れ曲がりを加えており、修復が必要です。
例えば下記付近に見えています。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3744278887#map=19/34.12691/133.01475
Ewen Hill (2023-01-30 03:57:37+00:00): Hi Fathima, welcome to OSM. A quick request to keep your change sets to small areas please. Most changesets should be to do with one area or one element. Also please consider detailing what changes you have made for what reasons please so other editors know what is going on. All the best and enjoy your editing.
Carto_Graph (2023-03-20 23:39:35+00:00): На сайте название старое осталось.
DmitryDolotovskikh (2023-03-21 05:11:10+00:00): Вот их сайт, на нем Ева https://evahotelcrimea.wixsite.com/hotel/about_us
DmitryDolotovskikh (2023-03-21 05:13:10+00:00): Ссылку на сайт я поменял
wkdgs (2023-01-31 11:10:03+00:00): Hier wäre wahrscheinlich ein "access=private" passender als "access=no".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131635625
JayTurnr (2023-10-19 12:39:29+00:00): I just want to say I love the level of detail you've done here! What inspired it?
Sefton Paine (2023-10-23 03:48:21+00:00): Hi Jay

What inspired it?   A breakdown! My need for fine detail!   and I lived in Hoser Gardens and Thanet for many years......  I was going to attempt to do the whole of Birchington but I realised that was a mad idea...
JayTurnr (2023-10-23 07:28:04+00:00): I did a bit in the Wimpey Estate in Rumfields, but quickly realised it's a lot of work and Bing isn't very detailed
nitro_expander (2023-02-03 15:51:46+00:00): keep change-set small or limited to a geographical region. this one spans whole of India
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131637281
Enock4seth (2023-06-03 22:14:30+00:00): Even though the name has "Chemist" it doesn't mean it's shop=chemist
RaphaelPasloin (2023-01-24 08:01:32+00:00): Please : read the history of the road and use up to date source imagery. This small part is especialy 2 way in order to permit some entrance on the gouvernement parking building. Have to reverse your edit.
Bolt056 (2023-01-25 04:46:51+00:00): Hello RaphaelPasloin,

Thanks for your time in reviewing the edits made and also making necessary edits required. We will take this feedback on serious note and make sure any such edits are not repeated

Thank you.
RaphaelPasloin (2023-01-24 11:33:53+00:00): Hello,

You indicate Bing as source, but this source clearly show a two way street. Recent street level imagery and Urbis show also a two way. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1624203131249426

Do you have more accurate up to date ground information ? 
Otherwise : Can you kindly reverse this edit ?
bxl-forever (2023-01-24 17:17:12+00:00): Moreover, it is extremely rare that a street will become one-way in Brussels without an exemption for cyclists (we add oneway:bicycle=no).

We appreciate contributions based on real local knowledge or accurate reports by road users.  Random edits based on interpretation of (possibly outdated or inaccurate) aerial imagery are likely to be treated as dubious and we might want to revert them.
Bolt056 (2023-01-25 04:35:58+00:00): Hello RaphaelPasloin,

Apologies for the incorrect edits made. Upon further investigation i realised my mistake and have reverted the edits made.

Will make sure such edits are not repeated here after. Thanks for you time and comments.

Have a nice day & happy mapping !!
abakus_uploader (2023-01-24 23:34:24+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Max-Kritic (2023-01-30 08:59:43+00:00): Encore un mauvais découpage. 

PS : Je trouve que 100 membres pour un multipolygone est gérable.
jcr83 (2023-01-26 17:05:09+00:00): Attention, vous avez transformé le pont du Roc en voie piétonne, alors que ce pont est ouvert à la circulation automobile (en sens unique). Merci de corriger cette erreur.
مكتب علي المهندس (2023-01-24 08:22:52+00:00): جيد
Allison P (2023-01-24 17:48:19+00:00): This segment you've added is actually a driveway. It has bollards preventing vehicle access except for emergencies. Please correct.
utirurao (2023-01-25 08:26:07+00:00): Hello Allison,

Thank you for reviewing our change set and highlighting the issue. Apologies for the incorrect edits. We have made the necessary corrections in the change set 131683222. We did not add the emergency access tag as we don't have a updated street view to validated it.
Thanks once again for the feedback provided, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards, 
utirurao
marc__marc (2025-12-06 22:57:17+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7336754817
quelle source te fait penser que la borne tri-standard n'a plus de combo css ?
Cordialement,
Marc
Jakka (2023-01-24 12:29:26+00:00): je meldt haltes bestaan niet meer OK maar ook de lijnen 31 want deze zitten nog in osm ?
Jakka (2023-01-24 12:36:58+00:00): de site de lijn toont deze ook niet meer ga deze ontmantelen.
wannesss (2023-01-24 12:46:45+00:00): die lijn is sinds 2018 afgeschaft, maar de haltes-huisjes werden nog maar zeer recent verwijderd (mogelijks nog niet allemaal, ik ga ze ter plaatse bezoeken)
Jakka (2023-01-24 12:50:44+00:00): Ik bedoelde de relatie routes die hier nog zichtbaar waren 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131640705#map=18/51.20938/4.45858&layers=TN
Mocht er een hokje per toeval meegesleurd zijn mag je deze er teug in zetten ;)
o_andras (2023-08-07 19:58:08+00:00): Olá! Em que te baseaste para mapear este riacho? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1134736769
Pelas ortofotos de 2021 não dá para distinguir qualquer linha de água, atravessando estradas, campos e até um edifício.
O curso de água é subterrâneo?
NorthCrab (2023-01-24 09:57:07+00:00): W tym przypadku najlepiej jest usunąć tagi dostępowe. Domyślne ograniczenia nie zezwalają na ruch rowerowy - nie ma więc po co komplikować. Dokumentacja: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Poland

W każdym bądź razie dzięki za poprawkę!
Harfeur (2023-01-25 08:48:53+00:00): Salut ! Je me demande s'il faut laisser l'attribut wall=no sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/62350955
Mevess (2023-01-28 13:05:56+00:00): c'est une bonne question, je l'ai mis en building:part dire de ne pas le supprimer comme je fais souvent avec les imports du cadastre.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:wall%3Dno
ça me semble pouvoir coller à la description du wiki, mais c'est pas idéal non plus.
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/building%3Apart=entrance#overview
building:part=entrance me plaît bien sinon
Harfeur (2023-01-28 15:06:26+00:00): En effet, si c'est une entrée, la deuxième option paraît mieux.
streckenkundler (2023-01-24 17:45:20+00:00): Hei,

nur mal nebenbei zur Info: hier in Brandenburg dürfen die LGB-Daten benutzt werden, siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brandenburg/Geoportal

Da hat man wesentlich bessere und aktuellere Luftbildbasis..

viele Grüße,

Sven
cave2596 (2023-01-25 11:50:32+00:00): Hallo Sven,
vielen Dank für Deinen Hinweis!
Tatsächlich mappe ich eigentlich nicht so viel in Brandenburg, sodass sich das für mich nicht so richtig für mich lohnt. Trotzdem Danke! Vielleicht werde ich das in Zukunft mal verwenden.
streckenkundler (2023-01-25 17:32:51+00:00): Hei,
Danke für die Rückmeldung. Ich werde immer hellhörig, wenn im source Bing steht... Noch ein Tip: hier ist in weiten Teilen Esri bedeutend besser, da Esri oft die Bilder der Landesvermessungsverwaltungen übernimmt und somit die selbe Lagegenauigkeit und Qualität haben, die sind vielleicht nicht immer so Aktuell wie die, des LGB, da hab ich aber keinen abschließenden Überblick. Maxar ist gerne mal aktueller, da Sat-Bild, aber auch grottig in der Qualität und der Lage. Gelegentlich erfasse ich nach Maxar und schiebe das Objekt anhand eines Passpunktes, den ich mir suche, dann richtig hin, das können schon mal 5-6 Meter sein, oder mehr...

Grüße,

Sven
eggie (2023-01-24 09:21:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback... Dat komt omdat Plasweg nr 37A op het zelfde punt ligt als adresnode nr1. 
Ik heb de adresnode uit elkaar geschoven. Wanneer 37A niet meer bestaat kan die adresnode verwijderd worden.
Beide adresnodes staan dus in de data van OSM.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-01-24 09:25:18+00:00): Plasweg 37A heb ik verwijderd..
Paar keer ctrl-f5 voor het effect. 
MVG
eggie
Shaun das Schaf (2023-01-24 19:30:58+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM!

So wie du die Öffnungszeiten angegeben hattest, konnten sie leider nicht maschinell ausgewertet werden. Dafür müssen sie in einem speziellen Schema vorliegen, welches hier genauer beschrieben wird:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

Ich habe es noch korrigiert:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131666457

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Piskvor (2023-01-24 10:28:23+00:00): Asi tam vypadlo "-í" v "náměstí," opraveno: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131644218
Frans S (2023-01-30 11:04:21+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A few remarks.
Please measure the width of a trace to decide how to tag it. A trace of >3 mtr wide is not a path, but a track or an unclassified road.
Please read the instructions where to use the track tags.
Best regards and keep mapping
marc__marc (2024-09-29 00:51:42+00:00): does it exist at this location ?
tag said it's moved to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4965867627
eggie (2023-01-24 10:15:57+00:00): Dag Luuk.. Wanneer de woningen zijn opgeleverd kan ook de regel construction=house verwijderd worden. 
Ik heb die regel nu verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
czebureks (2023-09-04 20:55:51+00:00): Cześć,
chciałbym tylko zwrócić uwagę na przesunięcie Ortofotomapy z 2022 roku. Proponuję do mikromapowania używać tej z 2021 roku (albo poczekać na nową z 2023). Częściowo już poprawiłem błędy wynikające z tego przesunięcia, ale zachęcam też do przejrzenia pozostałych edycji w północno-wschodniej Gdyni pod tym kątem.
kukułka (2023-09-10 18:22:32+00:00): Cześć. Dziekuję za info, ja to już kiedyś zauważyłem , ale zmiany w tym rejonie robiłem wcześniej. Dzięki za poprawki, pozdrawiam
eggie (2023-01-24 10:19:48+00:00): Nog een tip .. 
Elk begin ie moeilijk. 
Probeer als het even kan het water netjes gescheiden te laten van de landuse.
Ik heb wat aangepast.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-01-24 10:36:15+00:00): Dag bakkerdy... Dat ligt inderdaad een stuk netter zo.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131643143

MVG
eggie
Gonéo (2023-01-25 21:23:08+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre contribution. Vous avez demandé une relecture : je n'ai pas de remarque particulière à faire sur ce changement de no.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131643245
Cascafico (2023-01-24 11:48:57+00:00): Ciao Luca. Come standard in Italia abbiamo definito di mettere il civico come nodo in corrispondenza della targhetta
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131643871
DressyPear4 (2023-01-24 18:36:02+00:00): Olá, lote vazio não deve ser definido como park, você pode etiquetar como landuse=grass ou place=plot
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131643990
Strubbl (2023-01-24 20:04:24+00:00): Hi Spyboy77, currently we have Viktualienmarkt already mapped as pedestrian area and as marketplace. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7431621 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240014249. Does it makes to map it as a park, too?
Strubbl (2023-02-07 18:02:36+00:00): I have removed this park with CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132218488
MxxCon (2023-01-25 18:38:43+00:00): Hello.
I think the larger one is a trampoline. Otherwise it'd be really weird for a house to have 2 pools next to each other
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131644471
bxl-forever (2023-01-24 17:29:02+00:00): Hello,

(See our other comments on recent changesets of yours in Brussels.)

Our city has a very complicated structure and many exemptions for different modes.  We have spent considerable care in adjusting permissions to reflect the real situation as accurately as possible, through intense surveying.  It is very sad to see you adding lots of "oneway=yes" everywhere and breaking routing.  It’s fortunate there are some of us patrolling to catch the recent changes to prevent mistakes from staying too long on the map.

May I recommend you to create notes instead of editing the map directly.  We will analyse and deal with notes quite promptly.  That might be safer for everyone.

Thanks in advance.
Bolt056 (2023-01-25 04:43:24+00:00): Hello bxl-forever,

Thank you for the time and valuable comments. We will take your suggestions on high precedence and will double check before making any edits in Brussels with our ref data , else will create notes on the same for your help.

Thank you & Happy Mapping !!
gscholz (2023-01-26 09:26:46+00:00): Hi Peter,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:


https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=36.77921&lat=-1.31626&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131644768

Can you please fix this?

As you may know this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Kind regards
Guido
Peter Agenga (2023-01-27 10:27:21+00:00): Hi Guido, let me review the work again.

Kindest,
Peter.
wkdgs (2023-01-31 11:09:12+00:00): Sicher, dass es "access=private" und nicht "access=destination" ist?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131644769
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-01-24 16:30:32+00:00): I don't quite understand why make roads like this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1070032863#map=19/58.25475/22.50382 
round
bxl-forever (2023-01-24 17:23:55+00:00): Hello,

Sorry but this is wrong. :-(

Authorised vehicles (service vehicles and cyclists) coming from the park may legally turn left.
Your "oneway=yes" unnecessarily breaks routing for them.

I see you are mapping from another part of the world, without local knowledge.  I suppose you map based on reports from users; they probably do not provide you with accurate information. (Some people ignore some details, or they only think about cars and ignore how legislation accomodates other kinds of vehicles.)

We fixed the situation here.