piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
maasa123 (2026-02-05 16:45:51+00:00): Ändra inte path med foot=designated och bicycle=designated till cycleway. 

Cycleway är för när det endast är skyltat som cykelbana, dvs inte GC-bana.
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:32:24+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13521369539 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Digital marketing agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 05:04:47+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178435627
(No visible changes after review)
trigpoint (2026-04-03 11:19:33+00:00): An increase of the speed limit here seems unlikely. What sources did you actually use?

Cheers Phil
literan (2026-02-03 19:08:00+00:00): это не рестораны, зачем не соответствующий действительности тег вносить?
откат
kxeess (2026-02-04 15:19:59+00:00): менял через MapComplete в тематике Кафе и Бары (то есть заведения напитками). Сейчас там видимо путаница с понятиями "кафе" (еда) и кофейня (напитки). Постараюсь в тематике MapComplete поправить эти теги.
trigpoint (2026-04-03 11:19:55+00:00): An increase of the speed limit here seems unlikely. What sources did you actually use?

Cheers Phil
LBLaiSiNanHai (2026-02-03 12:02:35+00:00): ty
rempshaener (2026-02-04 19:02:41+00:00): Hallo,
zu diesem Änderungssatz habe ich eine Anmerkung:
Das Feld "couplings" bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten normalerweise leer, da es sich um die „Angabe der vorhandenen Anzahl an Schlauchanschlüssen“ handelt, siehe osm.wiki/DE:Key:couplings?uselang=de. Unterflurhydranten haben in der Regel nur mit Standrohr eine Schlauchkupplung. 
Viele Grüße
Rainero (2026-03-16 20:40:30+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179970801
(unzulässige Quelle)
literan (2026-02-03 19:07:25+00:00): дубль добавили, он рядом отмечен
eggie (2026-02-03 12:52:59+00:00): Dag Frank,
Het voetpad waar je mag fietsen heb ik losgemaakt van de landuse. Plakken kun je voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken tijdens intekenen.
De wegklasse heb ik aangepast naar highway=path Op een wandelpad mag je niet fietsen.

MVG
eggie
ViriatoLusitano (2026-02-04 09:27:05+00:00): Hello Txiko,

Just letting you be aware out that you can do this type of intense mapping sessions much more easily with JOSM instead of iD.

Fantastic micromapping of the region otherwise.
Strange_Dog (2026-02-03 11:51:12+00:00): дерева помічати просто так сенсу немає
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:32:28+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13521581910 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Real estate agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-12 05:04:49+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178079672
dmjab13 (2026-02-03 19:30:11+00:00): what high link was disconnected here? you just changed the layer tag in a way that doesn't make sense
Palary (2026-02-05 03:50:16+00:00): Hi dmjab13, 
I did the edit following the Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer#Guidelines) where it says: “Use the smallest suitable layer value…”
While the waterway is on the ground, the bridge and the highway sections needed to be assigned the next suitable tag of layer=1 according to the guidelines, instead of layer=3. 
Hope I was clear in communicating the reasoning behind my edit.
Comino (2026-02-03 22:51:48+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and osm.wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Maps
leonacostaok (2026-02-04 15:44:26+00:00): Hey Comino! thanks! we've removed the tag from future! thank you! and sorry for the inconvenience
Comino (2026-02-04 17:50:27+00:00): The tag is still there!
There are also mistakes in the address with needs fixing.
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:32:30+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13521562998 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Florist shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 05:04:51+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178435629
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
SomeoneElse (2026-02-05 11:40:42+00:00): You wouldn't happen to know if the sign at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9047561434 is still there or if it has been taken down, by any chance?
Simon Sustrans (2026-02-10 16:10:39+00:00): The sign may have been modified. I am relying on reports that a route section has been changed on the ground so that it is no longer part of the NCN, typically by the red number patch being covered.
SomeoneElse (2026-02-12 21:30:57+00:00): I'll have to go and have a look the next time I'm in the area.
SomeoneElse (2026-02-26 12:49:13+00:00): Ha - well, the current state can be seen at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/tmp/2954c6ef-1c9b-4322-97b0-9da37777c139~1.jpg .  One of the 166 references has been stickered over, one hasn't (or perhaps the sticker fell off or was removed).
Simon Sustrans (2026-03-03 16:59:33+00:00): Thanks Andy, maybe they ran out of stickers? According to WWCT records, that section is complete for removal of red patches.
dmjab13 (2026-02-03 19:26:46+00:00): this change seems incorrect, why would you mark the bridged onramps and lehigh st on the same layer?
Palary (2026-02-05 03:53:33+00:00): Hi dmjab13,
I did the edit following the Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer#Guidelines) where it says: “When ways are passing on different levels apply layer=* only to the way which also has the bridge/tunnel attribute.”
The parts of the link roads outside the bridge section are on the ground and not overlapping with other features so it would imply the default layer value of zero, regardless of differences in ground elevation. 
Hope I have given a clear explanation of my edits. Happy to discuss further if you need to.
felipeeugenio (2026-02-03 21:01:54+00:00): Hola. Basicamente todo en esta edición es un error. Arrastró varias cuadras una calles. En el sector playa desarmó todo el sistema de los parques y playas existentes. Por favor cuidado con las ediciones. Por favor ir mas lento y hacer modificaciones pequeñas.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178048415
eggie (2026-02-03 12:58:42+00:00): Dag Ovide,
Ik heb name=Openbaar Toilet verwijderd en onder description gezet.
Verder amenity=toilets toegevoegd. Dat geeft een symbool.

Tip Nooit name= gebruiken om iets te beschrijven. Net als niet gebruiken; name=huis name=boom name=bankje.
Daar zijn allemaal aparte tags voor. 
CTRL F5 voor het effect
MVG
eggie
EP_Repair (2026-05-25 16:20:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued.
lyctkel (2026-05-30 09:41:42+00:00): Hi fredgolightly,
you used disused:=retail here.
That looks like some kind of copy/paste error.
Was building=retail
 meant?
Kind regards,
lyctkel
fredgolightly (2026-05-30 09:53:29+00:00): No error, it's closed, tag removed
lyctkel (2026-05-30 09:58:41+00:00): Thanks.
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:32:33+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13521697184 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Air conditioning repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 05:04:54+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178435631
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 08:26:04+00:00): Reverted changeset 178049280 adding a SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags at a residential house with no likely verifiable POI on the ground, in changeset 184420533

https://osm.org/changeset/184420533
eggie (2026-02-03 13:01:26+00:00): Dag Kasper. Het lijkt me niet  correct om dan van de vijver een park te maken.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-03 13:03:06+00:00): De vijver heb ik teruggezet met de eigenschap dat deze leeg staat. 
MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:32:35+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13521710354 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Fish and chips shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 05:04:57+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178435632
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-05 07:23:47+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13521711578/history has shop = spare_parts that was added in this edit
shop=spare_parts ? What kind of spare parts? Of car parts? specialized machinery? sailing boats? train models? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for possible values - though maybe new one is needed)
bxl-forever (2026-02-03 14:13:01+00:00): Hello,

Can you please write more accurate changeset descriptions when you upload data to the OSM database.

"Amélioration vaira" does not contain any content.

It looks like you are changing tags or moving objects.

A bit of a warning: it looks like you attempted to modify the shape of existing buildings, like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260260851 while the summary provided with the iD editor announces that you used "CIRB/CIBG most recent aerial imagery" as the background.

This is not acceptable.  Buildings outlines in Belgium are obtained from numerical imagery provided by the regional governments.  We urge contributors to *never* trace buildings from aerial imagery, because those images are distorted, and buildings have a different distorsion with every year’s release, contrary to the official footprint which matches the official outline.

I will inspect your latest changes in Brussels and revert errors.
Joseph MV (2026-04-21 17:58:35+00:00): Das ist keine Zufahrtstrasse, sondern ein Gemeindeverbindungsweg.
Der Granziner Teil voller Schlaglöcher, der Benniner Teil wurde neu geschottert.
Ich fahre die Strecke regelmäßig.
wermak (2026-04-23 14:31:24+00:00): Straße wieder korrigiert.
Mathias_ADAV (2026-03-17 15:18:27+00:00): Bonjour,
idem c'est plutot une piste cyclable avec séparation piéton ?
Matthieu HUGOT (2026-05-07 07:42:01+00:00): Bonjour Mathias,

En principe c'est modifié sur l'ensemble du linéaire que j'avais créé.

Cordialement,
aTarom (2026-04-11 15:06:44+00:00): Hola, sabes si este tag en desuso
"address"="Orube plaza"
es quizás
"alt_name"
?
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52703605/history
Saludos
CrashLogger (2026-04-14 12:47:16+00:00): Estoy de acuerdo, arreglado.
Gracias!
Rainero (2026-03-16 20:37:14+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179970730
(unzulässige Quelle)
NeisBot (2026-02-03 13:33:22+00:00): Hi Alex0708, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 142% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features.

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178050923
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-03 16:37:53+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM.

Ist das ein Revert vom eigenen (Import?) Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174555726

Grüße
Pascal
NeisBot (2026-02-03 13:34:22+00:00): Hi Alex0708, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features.

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178050925
woodpeck (2026-02-03 14:50:06+00:00): User deleted their own contributions. -- Alex0708, this is obviously an automated data import, please follow the OSM import guidelines and discuss with the community before you act. If you plan to regularly delete and re-create the staging areas like you did now, this will almost certainly be a no-go with the community.
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-03 16:38:30+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM.

Ist das ein Revert vom eigenen (Import?) Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174555726

Grüße
Pascal
Alex0708 (2026-02-03 17:19:42+00:00): Hi all,

Please excuse the confusion,

No—this is not automatic input. I received the data from FRAPORT some time ago and entered it. I think it can be useful to identify the staging areas.
Now, a lot has changed in recent weeks and the staging areas have been redefined. It was too difficult for me to work out the individual differences. If there is a clever tool for this, I would be grateful for any tips. So I deleted the old staging areas and simply entered the new areas.

What would have been the way to act in accordance with OSM?

Best, Alex
SomeoneElse (2026-02-05 00:29:19+00:00): The procedure for "I received the data from X" data is generally https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines .
I'd expect discussion to include whether the data is accurate (presumably yes) what tags are best, and does anything else need mapping at the same time.  It likely does need discussing though.
woodpeck (2026-02-16 09:40:02+00:00): Hallo Alex0708, bitte melde dich doch in dieser Diskussion zu Wort https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/import-von-staging-areas-auf-dem-gelande-des-frankfurter-flughafens/141552 und erkläre Sinn und Charakter dieser Daten, damit die Community entscheiden kann, ob sie sie behalten will. Interessant wären für uns vorallem die Fragen (a) kann man so eine Staging-Area vor Ort sehen und (b) kann man die Daten der FRAPORT also korrigieren und verbessern, indem man vor Ort die Augen aufsperrt?
eggie (2026-02-03 13:43:51+00:00): Tom..De tag is niet highway=disused.. Dat is niet valide. maar disused:highway= track. Of path.
Mvg..
eggie
eggie (2026-02-03 13:45:57+00:00): Wanneer er fiets of wandelroutes lopen over paden die verdwijnen zal er eerst een oplossing moeten komen voor die routes.
Bv omleggen.
Vraag in zo n geval hulp via het forum aan de routeinleggers.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2026-02-03 13:55:05+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Ddisused

en

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:highway
eggie (2026-02-03 14:11:09+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=178051041

Ik heb weer wat aangepast. Gebruiks svp tagging die valide is binnen OSM.
Nog een tip. Doe niet te veel in één upload, maar doe zoiets bv in meerdere uploads. Dan is 'screening' ook makkelijker voor validators.

MVG
eggie
ItsAlyx (2026-02-03 20:32:51+00:00): please avoid committing very geographically dispersed changesets, one changeset per region helps massively with readability
rivermont (2026-02-16 05:02:35+00:00): Hello, why did you change the trail number to ref= from unsigned_ref= ? This trail has no numbered signage on the ground (which is why I changed it to unsigned_ref before...)
maasa123 (2026-02-04 22:10:05+00:00): Hej
Sätt inte redundanta taggar. Räcker med endast: 
access:no
timmyBird (2026-02-05 07:35:45+00:00): Varken GraphHopper eller OSRM verkar hålla med, tyvärr. Men att tagga för att tillfredsställa algoritmen är kanske att försöka lösa problemet på fel ställe?
maasa123 (2026-02-05 07:55:43+00:00): Ja, det blir lite av https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_router 

Jag har backat detta då det inte är olagligt/otillåtet att gå/cykla där. Har inte sett några förbudsskyltar eller liknande (kan ju självklart ha dykt upp något senaste veckorna dock...). 

Se https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178114408#map=19/57.747312/12.143987
timmyBird (2026-02-05 09:10:39+00:00): Märkligt nog är det ingen som försöker rutta mig genom övergången 250-300 m längre västerut som hade varit kortare. Jag har svårt att förstå skillnaden.
Negreheb (2026-03-07 09:58:32+00:00): Hey, wie kommst du denn zu den Infos? Das Apetyt hat meines wissens schon länger geschlossen und das Rosencafe hat laut Webseite auch schon seit 2022 geschlossen? Oder einfach übersehen, dass da was anderes drinne ist? Ich habs mal angepasst :)
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:32:36+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13521860351 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Film studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-12 05:04:58+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178154075
Marek-M (2026-02-05 20:58:17+00:00): Cześć, to co dodałeś do tego budynku jako nazwa (name), to powinno trafiać raczej do tagu opis (description) - poprawiłem https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178157617
aceman444 (2026-04-11 13:56:26+00:00): Hi, please put proper descriptions on your changesets, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments . Not just "updated tags". 

Although in this case it is actually the full description of what you have done here. Just blindly clicking "update tags" in the iD editor without knowing what you are doing. Thus losing correct names of pharmacies, changing CSOB,Wustenrot,Kooperativa wikidata to wrong one (Czech vs. Slovak branch), changing Z-Box parcel_locker brand to the one of its operator (which is even more weird because iD should know the brand=Z-Box as seen in https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=*&k=amenity&v=parcel_locker#zbox-e15ec5 , so it should not have proposed such a change). On atms the brand should not contain the bank operating it, that is in the operator tag.
Useless node at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13521889459 ?

So please no more of such mechanical changes, before you understand what they do and whether the new values are actually correct.

iD is known for wrong suggestions and you as a beginner should not blindly let it do changes you do not understand.

Thanks.
aceman444 (2026-06-05 22:16:42+00:00): Also, regardless of how some brands are written in their official documents, or the iD editor database, the shops are written differently on the ground, with different letter case. E.g. TABAK PRESS, Sofia, VEAN tattoo. So please do not change the names, if you haven't seen the shops in reality.
Skylark_H_C (2026-02-06 16:32:08+00:00): way/1472940487 shouldn't be tagged as a station, as I was meant to use it to label the vast open space in front of the station for people to walk or for bicycles to park. If you want to label the whole station outline, a new area covering the building, the roads, and the square should be created.
> The station itself is mapped as an area, usually covering the outline described above
(from wiki/Key:public_transport)
(but as there is already a node tagged with pt=station, maybe you can ask the community for consensus?)

And, why did you delete public_transport=stop_position, railway=stop, train=yes on node/8173005727 ? That seems unreasonable.
MassCartog (2026-02-03 14:35:23+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. Please read about the correct use of the Name tag here. Name tag is not for a description, or are log of what you are doing.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
MassCartog (2026-02-03 14:36:35+00:00): Could you please go back though all the homes you added and removing the incorrect name tags?
Selena Centeno (2026-02-03 14:44:57+00:00): sure
eggie (2026-02-03 16:16:32+00:00): Dag rh,

Merkwaardig dat er een stukje toegangsweg in het fietspad zit. Welke functie heeft dan deze toegangsweg. Staat er wel een bord fietspad vooraan?
Ik zie ook nog een fixme op een wegdeel staan.

MVG
eggie
rhteh (2026-02-03 16:32:57+00:00): Beneden aan de Ijsselmeerdijk staat een bord fietspad met een onderbord toegestaan voor landbouwvoertuigen. 
Dubbel gebruik van de weg om per fiets de dijk op te fietsen en voor de boer om aan de andere kant van de dijk zijn land te bereiken. De toegangsweg was al zo ingetekend.
eggie (2026-02-03 16:36:56+00:00): Ahh.. oke. Ik denk dat het dan beter als fietspad kan worden getagd ipv service en dan agricultural=yes toevoegen.
Wel type fietspad is dit?
Gr eggie
rhteh (2026-02-04 11:15:27+00:00): Ik heb het gewijzigd in een fietspad met agricultural=yes. Het is een onverplicht fietspad. 
Hoe los ik de fixme op?
eggie (2026-02-04 11:21:17+00:00): Wanneer je de weg selecteert en je ziet alle tagregels kun je gewoon die regel verwijderen.

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:32:38+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/535228506 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Ingenieurbüro"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Ingenieurbüro"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-12 06:24:23+00:00): 🤔 The text has been updated, though I’m not entirely sure it’s an improvement.