piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_18137562 (2024-04-25 12:13:39+00:00): Hola, lo he eliminado porque sí sé lo que es: un edificio que no existe y hasta donde se ha publicado, no se va finalmente a construir porque el propio gobierno renunció a ello: https://www.elnortedecastilla.es/valladolid/gobierno-carpetazo-centro-refugiados-delicias-20240117165404-nt.html
MarinoBM (2024-04-25 19:18:21+00:00): En ese caso, mejor que eliminarlo es cambiar el etiquetado a landuse = greenfield.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:landuse%3Dgreenfield
mcliquid (2024-04-25 11:18:06+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
sauce1984 (2024-04-25 12:28:19+00:00): Hello
please be aware that the change set was created by Street Complete_ee. might be worth it to file a bug report to address the issue.
have a good day
mcliquid (2024-04-25 19:52:22+00:00): It must be noted at the outset that the editor's role does not include the task of regulating the size of changesets. Indeed, at this stage, there is no automated process in place to limit this aspect of editorial work in any editor. This is therefore a problem that can be attributed to human intervention, rather than to any underlying programming issue.
I hope this clarifies the situation and I thank you for your understanding.
Lezurex (2024-05-10 13:08:03+00:00): Hallo SelinaSmile
Bist du dir sicher, dass hier Tempo 80 bis mitten ins Dorf markiert ist? Falls nicht, bitte die Strasse am entsprechenden Node in iD mit der Taste X aufteilen und Tempo 50 resp. 80 erfassen.
StephaneP (2024-05-23 19:11:19+00:00): Bonjour Alexis,

Suite à ce que je pense être une erreur de manipulation, tous les noeuds de la voie ferrée entre Torfou et Cholet, portaient la ref de la voie.
J'ai fait la correction dans ce changeset : https://www.osm.org/changeset/151739586

A+

Stf
UtopiaU (2024-04-25 16:40:44+00:00): How do you place nodes for agricultural areas and trees over residential homes in an area inhabited by people and registered with the Iraqi authorities as residential complexes??
LockOnGuy (2024-04-25 16:52:47+00:00): @UtopiaU You had removed the orchard landuse couple of times in the last couple days instead of improving it. This is wrong as the area is mostly trees still if you look at the satellite image. Next time please cut the residential areas from the landuse instead of removing all the landuse. Regards.
mcliquid (2024-04-25 13:10:21+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
VLD549 (2024-05-16 07:17:47+00:00): Hi, a few questions:
 1. Could you indicate the source used to show the name to be Voetweg 39 Pastoor Paul Vercruyssewegel? 
2. All these 'voetwegen' need hyphens from what I've seen, right?
3.  I recently understood that in case of voetwegen, we should write the name first, and then the number.

A message from one of your mapping colleagues: 
Putting the name as first gives priority to the name and puts the administrative number (of a system that is old and confusing) on a second place.

Should I change the order now to 
Pastoor Paul Vercruyssewegel - Voetweg 39?

4. Doesn't Vercruyssewegel need a hyphen or space in between?

Thank you!
De Meyer José (2024-05-16 13:13:11+00:00): you can change the name as suggested
VLD549 (2024-05-24 08:26:17+00:00): Ok.
fortera_au (2024-04-25 09:31:09+00:00): Hi, is there actually a park here? I can't see anything on aerial imagery, and the shape is odd.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150482438
BR_pebble (2024-05-22 06:06:35+00:00): Hello Meralyilan
Thank you for mapping!
I have added missing building 41.0676427, 28.913473;
41.0685588, 28.9152757;
41.0685525, 28.9152507;
41.068308, 28.9149521;
41.0684635, 28.9152029;
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
relaemanila 2 (2024-04-27 13:41:50+00:00): what is damaged.
Filip009 (2024-04-26 09:53:55+00:00): Zdravím, prečo táto zmena? Alzabox ste tam už pridal deň predtým. Prosím odstráňte tento nový.
Filip009 (2024-04-26 09:54:16+00:00): Zdravím, prečo táto zmena? Z-box ste tam už pridal deň predtým. Prosím odstráňte tento nový.
Vinber-Pro (2024-04-25 12:29:00+00:00): Solange,
ici tu as donné comme nom piste <- c'est une description.
Nous pouvons en discuter en direct
Frans S (2024-07-20 09:31:24+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping.

B: Overlapping buildings.

E: Buildings not squared.

H: Included a yard of clearing.



Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150483618
habi (2024-09-05 09:39:37+00:00): Ciao Celina
Hier ist etwas schief gegangen: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=150483717
Ich habe dein Changeset zurückgesetzt, weil ich eh grad alle Adressen im Spiegel anpasse.
Ä Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156221822
nevw (2024-04-25 09:24:33+00:00): Hi, you have mapped as unit B but the website lists Shop 2 72 STATION ST. SOMERVILLE VIC 
Can you check thanks
rskedgell (2024-04-25 09:50:22+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding these speed limits.

In addition to the maxspeed=60 mph tag, as there is a national speed limit sign, you could also add maxspeed:type=GB:nsl_single 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:type#United_Kingdom

It's not essential to add it and your tagging is fine as it is, but some data consumers may find the extra tag useful.
user_177389 (2024-04-25 11:53:42+00:00): What do you want to do by constantly changing the roles of the relation members from outer to inner? The relations are fine as they are!
Supaplex (2024-04-27 06:06:21+00:00): 為何要刪除樹呢?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150484208
TrickyFoxy (2024-04-28 19:51:43+00:00): Не вносите тестовые данные
Kovoschiz (2024-04-25 10:03:24+00:00): 1. Please stop adding lot info on `landuse=` directly. This is not the standard practice locally. 
2. Please don't duplicate the same info on every `building=` 
3. Please don't delete other objects you have no concern in. They have other uses.
Kovoschiz (2024-04-25 10:03:48+00:00): 4. Please stop adding "號" in `addr:housenumber=`
Kovoschiz (2024-04-25 10:04:30+00:00): 5. Don't use uppercase
Kovoschiz (2024-04-25 13:07:15+00:00): 6. `=site` is not neccessary in the simple 2D case of all objects inside a polygon. It's only needed for complicated 3D situations.
HirschKauz (2024-05-20 06:02:49+00:00): Hoppla - bitte dran denken: Öffnungszeiten sind kein Freitext sondern können nur strukturiert von den Renderern interpretiert werden. (Ich habs korrigiert)  Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150485080
AurélienQ (2024-05-18 13:55:26+00:00): Bonjour, 
Etes vous sûr de la quantité d'électricité produite ?
Si vous ne vous êtes pas trompés cela signifierais que cette centrale produirait les 3/4 de l'électricité solaire française ... (j'ai quelques doutes).
Cordialement,
Aurélien
AurélienQ (2024-05-18 14:02:49+00:00): D'après ce document officiel (https://www.somme.gouv.fr/contenu/telechargement/33640/205649/file/Rapport+et+Avis+-+Dde+PC+-+CS+Vauvoix+.pdf), 13GWH est la production maximale annuelle. La puissance produite (celle qui est à renseigner sur OSM) est de 10,1 MW, ce qui est un peu plus crédible au vu de la surface. On ne produit plus l'équivalent de 8 réacteurs nucléaires😅...
Bref, je corrige et je source. Merci pour l'ajout de la centrale.
Quaternion (2024-04-29 09:41:27+00:00): Einfahrten, welche über abgesenkte Bordsteinkanten führen und obendrein keinen Straßennamen besitzen, sind in aller Regel highway=service. highway=unclassified ist in diesem Fall definitiv unangemessen.
stimme-logistik (2024-05-14 18:07:25+00:00): Hey, tausend Dank für deine Information - allerdings hat das eine Mitarbeiterin im Hause gemacht welche nicht mehr bei uns arbeitet. Was genau wurde hier erledigt? Muss ich noch was anpassen?
Quaternion (2024-05-14 18:14:34+00:00): Hallo, danke für die Rückmeldung. Es ist nichts mehr zu tun. Ich habe das "Problemchen" vor einigen Tagen korrigiert, siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151109737
stimme-logistik (2024-05-17 15:48:45+00:00): Danke schön :-) ... ich bin nun 14 Tage im Urlaub ... in der Zeit haben 2 Vertretungen die Einweisung erhalten ... sollten Sie Mist bauen, seid bitte Nachsichtig mit Ihnen - ab 03.06.2024 bin ich wieder da :-). LG Ramona
fortera_au (2024-04-25 09:52:11+00:00): Hi, is this name currently signed on this location? If not, it should be removed and is more appropriate for OpenHistoricalMap
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150485566
literan (2024-04-25 19:07:37+00:00): дубли больниц, уже обозначенных площадями, внесли. зачем?
mavl (2024-04-25 13:07:58+00:00): Здравствуйте. Удаляя подряд все точки, вы испоритили здание.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182735877
mavl (2024-04-25 13:11:32+00:00): Этот пакет правок частично отменён. Я восстановил точку, которая была частью здания.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1930928158/history
dypa (2024-04-25 13:12:29+00:00): приветсвую, старался аккуратно быть с way и relation. я восставновлю точку
mavl (2024-04-25 13:13:38+00:00): Я уже восстановил.
dypa (2024-04-25 13:26:11+00:00): спасибо, но при этом восстановились удаленные точки :( я удалю эти точки в ближайшее время. если найдете еще ошибки, то я готов их исправлять без полного отката.
mavl (2024-04-25 15:28:43+00:00): Это моя ошибка. Я планировал восстановить только одну точку. Не проверил как следует. Вижу, вы уже удалили точки..
Supaplex030 (2024-04-25 18:08:04+00:00): Hallo momabebra,
wie in früheren Changesets bereits angemerkt habe ich auch dieses teilweise zurückgesetzt, um die gelöschten Einfahrten wiederherzustellen.
lg, Alex
BCNorwich (2024-04-26 06:40:27+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed most of the highway Way: 1276017526 that you added because it duplicates an existing highway. It also joins to a river and a bridge would be missing.

I've also restored the highways that you deleted because it can be seen that the highways do exist.

Please make any highway corrections on the existing highways.

Regards Bernard.
DeFra85 (2025-12-27 22:38:19+00:00): Ahoi, das ist kein Gebäude, sondern nur eine Terrasse
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-23 21:48:35+00:00): W jakim sensie drzewo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11846826955/history ma godziny otwarcia?
Konradowy (2025-08-24 07:01:02+00:00): Wygląda jak godziny otwarcia z tego kościoła https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375634426 ale z kąt się tu wzięły to nie wiem
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-25 16:06:42+00:00): to skasuję je
swinetown (2024-04-25 11:51:36+00:00): Hello Whatley Brothers.

Just as an fyi, I've changed a few of your edits so they're correctly tagged as per OSM guidelines. Rest assured OSM is reflecting the definitive map.

- You changed the track from Hackpen Lane to Meadows Path to a highway=footpath; I have changed this back to highway=track as it's a track acting as a public footpath, which is also adequately reflected in our tagging.

- You removed the highway tag altogether from the track from Burderop Farm Dairy to The Ridgeway; again it is a track so I have updated it with stronger access=private tags rather than removing the track altogether.

- You did the same as above with the track labeled Airfield Lane. Could you confirm the access status of this track? It's not a public footpath but it also isn't gated or has any 'private' signage.
Whatley Brothers (2024-04-25 12:10:01+00:00): The issue we have had when they are shown as a track on this platform is that the dashed line is far too similar to the footpath dashed line. When I have stopped people in the past, they have been confused by this similarity. As a track is not a footpath, I don't think it has any relevance to be shown on this platform as a track and therefore I stand by why I have removed any classification, in order to make it more obvious to users. I know you can show this as a private track, but people don't seen to take any notice of the private tagging and continue to think of it as a footpath. I hope you can understand where I am coming from and the consequent trespassing issues we are having. 

In answer to your last point, Airfield lane. It is a private track. Unfortunately our signage gets removed on a regular basis.
swinetown (2024-04-25 17:22:32+00:00): I've now re-tagged all of the private tracks (Airfield Lane included) so they should now clearly appear as greyed-out on the map, and all routing software using OSM should no longer allow cutting through them (they were only tagged as motor_vehicle=private before, not outright private).

This should help at least somewhat; while I agree that the universal solution to avoid confusion would be to hide the private tracks from the map and tag the public footpath track as highway=footway, unfortunately that doesn't fit with the current instructed provisions (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access_provisions_in_the_United_Kingdom).

Lots of different third-party platforms use OSM as a base and many of those applications have different textures and rendering styles etc so while some would clearly indicate the private status, others wouldn't. As said above routing should work on all platforms though.

Although I see where you're coming from on not showing the track at all, as a contributor I can't really change the terminology of OSM alone. If you wanted to challenge it you could drop a suggestion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/.

Good luck with sorting the trespassing issues out, sorry I can't help more but hopefully this'll make a slight difference.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-25 10:30:21+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/438753952

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
daganzdaanda (2024-06-22 12:11:34+00:00): Hallo DJ-R-Summer, willkommen bei OSM! Danke dass du die Karte verbesserst hast! 

Nur zur Info: Ich habe deine Firma von "Bar" auf "IT-Unternehmen" umgeändert. Ist die Website nur temporär down? Wenn nicht, kannst du sie noch ergänzen, und auch z.B. die Telefonnummer und e-mail.

Weiter viel Spaß beim Mappen,
servus, daganzdaanda
DD1GJ (2024-05-01 07:20:26+00:00): Hallo Ickinho, Deine neu eingetragen bzw. geänderten Strände sind seltsam und größtenteils unglaubwürdig. Es sieht so aus, als wolltest Du mit falschen Daten das Spiel Pokémon Go massiv beeinflussen. Dies ist im Projekt unerünscht.

Ich habe daher alle Deine Änderungen der letzten Tage rückgängig gemacht.

https://pokemon-go-forum.de/threads/pokemon-go-spieler-zerstoeren-open-streetmaps.3160/
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-25 10:40:30+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2403239541
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446471656

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
miluethi (2024-04-30 02:52:40+00:00): Viidii,
Your buildings shapes are far too big, I'm going to delete them. Please work more carefully.
Thanks
MichaelFS (2024-04-25 15:17:29+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Danke für die Aktualisierung. 

Die Einträge sehen gut aus, ich habe noch ein paar Daten ergänzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/history#map=19/48.53004/12.14705

Falls die Mobiltelefon-Nummer (Key: mobile) und e-Mail Adresse (email) wichtig ist, kann man diese ergänzen; ich habe das nicht gemacht wegen dem Personenbezug; ggf. wäre eine Funktions-Adresse JugendarbeitLandshut@... sinnvoll. 

Bei Fragen einfach hier melden ...

Viele Grüße
Michael
Filip009 (2024-04-26 09:42:12+00:00): Zdravím, viete o tom, že ste zmenil kostol na Železničnú stanicu? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73386397/history/5
JozefKascak (2024-04-26 10:56:04+00:00): Za toto sa ospravedlnujem, nevsimol som si misclick ...
Filip009 (2024-04-26 11:50:27+00:00): Okej, nevadí, opravil som :)
Filip009 (2024-04-26 09:44:53+00:00): Zdravím, nepochopil som vašu zmenu. Wikidata, ktoré boli predtým priradené severnejšiemu kostolu ste presunul na ten južnejší, a tomu severnejšiemu ste potom pridal meno, ktoré je spomenuté v tých wikidátach. Viete mi prosím objasniť, čo ste chceli spraviť?
JozefKascak (2024-04-26 10:58:29+00:00): Samozrejme, v obci su dva chramy, greckokatolicky a pravoslavny. Juzny, greckokatolicky je NKP a tym padom mu patri spominana polozka Wikidat. Severny, pravoslavny, s rovnakym patroniciom (len drobnym rozdielom vo formulacii "nezistnych") je novsi. Neslo mi pridat nazov, ak som pridal Wikidata k juznemu chramu, teraz uz viem, co planujem upravit.
Filip009 (2024-04-26 11:54:12+00:00): Okej, vďaka za objasnenie :)
miluethi (2024-04-29 04:36:02+00:00): Hi Rajeshkanna,

Please square out all building whenever possible. Select the building shape and press the "Q" key.
Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
tekim (2024-04-25 19:25:45+00:00): Hello, Thanks for your edit to the map!  You cited Google Maps as one of your sources.  Unfortunately, when editing OpenStreetMap we are not allowed to use Google Maps due to Google's Terms of Service.  This applies even if you believe that the original information came from the operator - once the information is in Google Maps it belongs to Google.  Perhaps you can go directly to the operator to get the information. 

Hallo, vielen Dank für Ihre Bearbeitung der Karte! Sie haben Google Maps als eine Ihrer Quellen genannt. Leider ist es uns bei der Bearbeitung von OpenStreetMap aufgrund der Nutzungsbedingungen von Google nicht gestattet, Google Maps zu verwenden. Dies gilt auch dann, wenn Sie glauben, dass die ursprünglichen Informationen vom Betreiber stammen - sobald die Informationen in Google Maps sind, gehören sie Google. Vielleicht können Sie sich direkt an den Betreiber wenden, um die Informationen zu erhalten.
Silvio Kennecke (2024-04-25 19:32:34+00:00): Hello rekindle, thanks for the check. I added it as source, as it was the most convenient and I know that it’s been added by the operator. As I’m already at home for today, I just check the official data from the operator‘s website to be able to add it as additional source. One reference can be found at https://tabakquartier.com/der-quartierspark-nimmt-gestalt-an-erste-bereiche-in-den-letzten-zuegen/
Silvio Kennecke (2024-04-25 19:34:22+00:00): In case this link get‘s invalid in future, here is an archived version of it: https://web.archive.org/web/20231002181444/https://tabakquartier.com/der-quartierspark-nimmt-gestalt-an-erste-bereiche-in-den-letzten-zuegen/
tekim (2024-04-25 19:48:27+00:00): Thanks for your reply.  I am going to go ahead and revert the changeset, and you can redo the edit with the official source only.
tekim (2024-04-25 19:48:51+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150512026
Silvio Kennecke (2024-04-25 19:50:46+00:00): Sounds good
miluethi (2024-04-30 12:12:39+00:00): Kimidi,

Please square out all buildings and size the shape according to satellite imagery. Your shapes are far too big.

Squaring is easy: draw a building shape and press the "Q" key. That's it.

Also stop naming unknown buildings. I'm going to delete a few of your buildings.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
Frans S (2024-07-23 08:50:59+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper. Sorry, a bit late.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping.
D: Connecting Nodes to other features.
E: Buildings not squared.
G: Included the shadow of the building .


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150491902
Adrian Shobrooke (2024-05-24 11:50:04+00:00): Imagery showing route to join track to remaining highway obscured by cloud.
NeisBot (2024-04-30 11:04:04+00:00): Hello kamen1, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-25 11:50:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1008895362

Pozdrawiam! 🦀