piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BYM - Ola Juul Holm (2024-11-06 10:15:12+00:00): Gang og sykkelvei skal være skiltet, så hvis skilting mangler kan du gå ut i fra at det er regulert som en gangvei eller fortau. Det hadde vært fint om du sjekker Google Street View eller Mapillary etter skilting før du tagger strekninger i Oslo som Gang- og Sykkelvei. Hvis det mangler skilting setter jeg pris på om du tagger det som gangvei der sykling er tillatt. Det blir nesten alltid mest nøyaktig.

Her er et offentlig kart fra Oslo Kommune over sykkeltilrettelegging. Kartet mangler forløpelig Gang og Sykkelveier, men det forventes å legges inn fortløpende ila året.

https://www.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/94def0919a2a42b8a6856ea6af3fceee
FennecusZerda (2024-11-07 12:21:26+00:00): Takk for deling. Ja, jeg skal ligge unna Oslo fra nå rundt dette. Relatert til ditt siste poeng om tagging av sykkel på gangvei, så er vel konsensus i OSM-miljøet i Norge (og også standard for informasjon til rutemotorer som skal støtte Norge spesielt - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Norway) at sykling generelt er lov på alle fortau/gangveier og dermed ikke nødvendig å tagges spesielt.
eggie (2024-05-02 14:00:43+00:00): Dag Andras   
Alleen een naam doet niets in OSM . Je zult ook de aard van het bedrijf 'moeten' toevoegen.
company=office?

MVG
eggie
itineris (2024-05-02 13:47:31+00:00): Mint ahogyan a címben is szerepel: csak Lippóig adták át. (A végét majd akkor, ha a horvátok elérnek a határig.) Javítod?
Bálint (2024-05-02 16:33:14+00:00): Szia, javítottam, köszi
Kovoschiz (2024-05-17 10:10:03+00:00): Please don't delete directly, as they represent a shop space, and may contain an address. Change it to a plain "point" to eliminate it.
Drunk501 (2024-05-17 10:21:23+00:00): Thanks for letting me know. I passed by the spot the other day and it looks like an empty retail space to let. Are there any tags for that?
eggie (2024-05-02 14:03:17+00:00): Andras   Tip  Niet schuiven met de kaart svp in editmodus. Dat levert vaak schade op door onbedoelde verschuivingen.
Je hebt op Teuge een adres verschoven.
MVG
eggie
BR_pebble (2024-05-22 07:58:47+00:00): Hello Meralyilan
Thank you for mapping!
I have added missing buildings 41.0730189, 28.9108321;
41.0716773, 28.9128008;
41.0717105, 28.9127584;
41.0715263, 28.9128444;
41.0715441, 28.9128427;
41.0715324, 28.9129274;
41.071202, 28.913064;
41.0711652, 28.9131001;
41.0712204, 28.9130208;
41.0712689, 28.9129612;
41.0712026, 28.9130245;
41.0712248, 28.912687. I also added the missing elements to several of your tasks.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
Jakuje (2024-11-18 16:21:03+00:00): Dobry den, status poznate podle otrofoto map? Nebo z ceho jste vychazel, ze se jedna o silnici treti tridy?
Jiří Bilík (2024-11-18 17:53:32+00:00): Ověřoval jsem to na TSB, a.s.
Jakuje (2024-11-18 16:20:21+00:00): Ano, tunel je pod estakadou, ale neni s ni spojeny. Tim, ze jste v teto zmene spojil spolecnym bodem
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9335193200
tak jsem posledni mesice premyslel, proc me ta navigace vede tak divne. Ted by melo byt opraveno.
Jiří Bilík (2024-11-18 17:56:49+00:00): Hrubá chyba, které jsem si nevšiml. Máte pravdu.
Đuro Jiří (2024-05-02 21:03:25+00:00): Così 
name = Via Sandro Pertini
ref = SP96 bis
e no 
name = Via Sandro Pertini SP 96bis
BLUES01 (2024-05-03 07:12:54+00:00): ok, grazie per info.
maro21 (2024-05-02 16:11:23+00:00): Please don't remove closed POIs that way. Mark them as "disused:" instead. The indoor=room is still there despite closed restaurant. Correct marking: https://osm.org/way/868584841

https://osm.wiki/Keep_the_history
https://osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Filip009 (2024-07-09 19:36:39+00:00): Zdravím, prosím uveďte nejaký verejne dostupný zdroj, kde sa vyskytuje pomenovanie Aljaška.
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-06 08:49:50+00:00): Thank you for mapping. It would be great if changeset comments were provided. The mapping looks good. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150796284
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-02 14:20:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250785880
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1032032192

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MFlamm (2024-05-02 18:01:24+00:00): Bonjour, 
Pouvez-vous svp expliquer pourquoi vous avez changé les catégories de plusieurs des routes dans ce changeset?
Pour info, la catégorisation des routes doit obéir à certaines règles et elle a fait l'objet d'intenses réflexions à Genève (voir: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routes_principales_dans_le_canton_de_Genève).
Sai_333 (2024-05-03 09:38:24+00:00): Bonjour,
C'était par cohérence entre les différents axes routiers en prenant en considération, le flux, la taille des routes, le nombre de voie et la vitesse autorisée.
En lisant la page citée, j'ai corrigé les modifications concernant la route de pré-Lauret car je n'avais pas la notion qu'elle avait été qualifiée de secondaire au vu de sa connexion entre la route de Chancy et l'autoroute. 
Concernant les routes de la commune d'Avusy, la classification de route forestière ne correspond pas à la réalité selon moi.
Pour la route de Bernex, je trouvais incohérent de la classer pareil que la route de soral au vu du flux qui passe sur la route de soral, de sa taille et de son importance, en comparaison avec la route de Bernex qui voit beaucoup de ralentisseurs et autres ajouts dans le but de réduire le trafic qui y circule.
J'espère ne pas avoir commis un impair et avoir répondu à vos questions.
MFlamm (2024-05-03 10:06:49+00:00): Merci pour ces explications et pour avoir rétabli l'axe en secondary par la Rte de Pré-Lauret. Je comprends bien que cette catégorisation est discutable, mais elle répond à la hiérarchie officielle du canton et vise à mettre en évidence l'axe privilégié pour le trafic entre Bernex et Plan-les-Ouates (notamment en cas de fermeture du tunnel de Confignon). Concernant les autres routes, je propose qu'on échange par mails directs.
josmougn (2024-06-03 22:45:35+00:00): Salut Carto'Cité,
Tant qu'à mettre à jour le P vélo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1239449947/ tu aurais pu utiliser ou supprimer le nœud existant (avec fixme) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11514343953.

Je ne suis pas convaincu de mettre bicycle_parking=stands
Les attache-vélo sont bizarres, ce ne sont pas des stands. Je ne les ai pas essayés mais ils n'ont pas l'air pratiques :
https://pic.infini.fr/gallery#U0BcrKyg/KjC8kPgY.JPEG (lien valide 30 jours).
A bientôt dans le secteur ? José
Carto'Cité (2024-06-04 07:07:09+00:00): J'avais pas vu ce node, désolé : je l'ai fusionné à un coin du parking ;-)
J'ai changé le type de parking en safe_loops, je sais pas si c'est super safe mais il me semble que c'est ce qui ressemble le plus.
Antoine.
josmougn (2024-06-04 07:45:52+00:00): c'est sympa de fusionner le point sans le supprimer.
De la fenêtre du tram j'ai aperçu le même genre de supports vélo dans d'autres gares, par exemple à Longjumeau. Peut-être ce point mais je n'en suis pas certain https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11876631050 
José
Carto'Cité (2024-06-04 08:03:26+00:00): Bien vu, j'ai corrigé pour Longjumeau.
J'ai parfois anticipé l'installation des attaches sur des "bâtiments" à priori destinés à être un parking à vélo, comme à la station Traité de Rome : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11901014649
InsertUser (2024-05-02 17:36:49+00:00): Sorry for the nonsense changeset description. This should read "changed descriptive name to documented tag for blue holes" but I pressed the wrong button.
Branko Kokanovic (2024-05-03 15:31:16+00:00): Vidim da si promenio iz "Краља Александра првог Карађорђевића" u "Краља Александра I Карађорђевића". Ulica se po RGZ-u zove " 	КРАЉА А. 1 КАРАЂОРЂЕВИЋА" (prilično čudno, moram da priznam). Jel imaš bar neku tablu iz centra ovde da vidimo šta piše? Svakako ne bih zvao ulicu "Kralja A. 1", ali je pitanje da li da je stavimo kao "prvog" ili kao "I" ili kao "1". Tabla bi pomogla
eggg-uk (2024-05-02 16:08:58+00:00): Thanks!
Orange beach camp karavan club (2024-05-07 15:48:31+00:00): our place is opened and work 12 mounth in year.
Frans S (2024-05-05 09:28:56+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Connected nodes of highways to buildings.
They should be connected to other highways (Paths)

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150799737
Marcelo Camargo Mapa (2024-05-02 15:45:49+00:00): Tem mais outro estacionamento na esquina
HenriSaucisse (2024-05-02 16:03:26+00:00): Existe un problema con el elemento ciénagas del Name
tekim (2024-05-06 13:57:20+00:00): reverting a changeset that contains fake edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150966776
MapSpot (2024-05-06 19:10:53+00:00): Excellent detailing work.
Just leaving a message to let you know for future edits that the parking_space=private tag has been recently phased out of use in favor of access=private for private parking spaces.
ExoMal (2024-05-07 10:47:18+00:00): Thanks, been running low on things to actually add in the local area haha.
ExoMal (2024-05-07 10:49:35+00:00): I'll bare the private parking tagging in mind, thanks.
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-06 03:40:53+00:00): Thank you for mapping. Please provide valid changeset comment for mass deletion. Also, look for the way if the deletion can be minimized.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150800729
literan (2024-05-02 16:59:08+00:00): "Прокат" это не название, а текст с вывески. Не надо такое вносить как название магазина
Oakcat (2024-05-02 18:37:58+00:00): Нет, это прокат, который называется Прокат. Они супероригинальны, да. Могу фото прислать.
Oakcat (2024-05-02 18:39:15+00:00): Ну либо он тогда никак не назывется, если считать это не названием, а функцией. Других вывесок там нет.
literan (2024-05-02 19:11:14+00:00): думаю, он никак не называется.

Хотя, если там написано 

ПРОКАТ "Прокат", я еще поверю. Но это как МАГАЗИН "Магазин".

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#%D0%98%D0%BC%D1%8F_%E2%80%93_%D1%8D%D1%82%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B8_%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE
ivanbranco (2024-08-04 20:28:18+00:00): Hi Iain Stewart, in this case you added the wiki tags for "Mural" to this mural. This is not correct, the links should link pages describing this specific mural
VictorIE (2024-05-16 08:59:56+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11874481969

There are some would-be power poles mapped as mapillary=169537485001208 or similar.
Mikey Co (2024-05-02 16:44:05+00:00): We seem to have updated the same area at the same time, LOL
DorneyLake123 (2024-05-02 17:05:23+00:00): yeah sorry, I try to keep away from your territory when you're online ;)

Map's looking a lot better, my Modus Operandi at the moment is to add farmland to find missing residential areas. I try to draw them to allow fences/hedges to be traced correctly (OSMUK Cadastrals are really good for this), but when there's footpaths involved I don't want to add them on the wrong side, hence why there'll be gaps.
Mikey Co (2024-05-02 20:10:52+00:00): I'll remove the duplicate mapping.

With footpaths, actual surveying is the only way to be 100% sure where they actually go. I've been filling in some of the footpath mapping from previous walks that I never mapped at the time.
tekim (2024-05-08 17:49:51+00:00): reverting fake edit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151068650
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-14 22:42:15+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151334492 
Please don't add extra ways. This changeset also added deadend motorways and broke route relations
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-14 22:42:45+00:00): and overlapping ways
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-06 08:46:53+00:00): Thank you for mapping. Thank you for your good changeset comments. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150802608
tekim (2024-05-02 23:08:32+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Thanks for your edits to the map.  It is through edits from volunteers like you that we keep the map up-do-date.  I see you cited "Google Maps" as your source.  Unfortunately, when editing OpenStreetMap we are not allowed to use (copy from, cite, use for validation, etc).  This is due to Google's Terms of Service.
tekim (2024-05-02 23:09:05+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150814598
Rémi_ (2024-05-14 17:21:20+00:00): Bonjour
Sur cette modification, vous avez changé la zone résidentielle entière de Grand-Couronne en un bâtiment industriel. 
C'est corrigé, pour les prochaines fois pensez à vérifier vos modification avant et après l'upload et à prendre en compte les avertissements.
tekim (2024-05-06 13:56:51+00:00): reverting a changeset that contains fake edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150966759
tekim (2024-05-06 13:56:19+00:00): reverting a changeset that contains fake edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150966724
tekim (2024-05-06 01:17:47+00:00): reverting a fake edit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150943467
Axelos (2024-05-02 17:20:04+00:00): Erreur dans le titre, c'est la Rue Thierry Alix.
Kovirii (2026-05-17 16:10:22+00:00): Has Fire Station 6 been staffed full time?
silversurfer83 (2024-05-02 19:47:22+00:00): Passt :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150803936
Supaplex030 (2024-05-02 19:13:55+00:00): Hallo MisterMapy,

vielen Dank für deine vielen Prüfungen der Berliner Straßenbrunnen! Ein Kommentar zu deiner Änderung hier: Die drei von dir hier gelöschten Brunnen habe ich wieder hergestellt und mit dem in OSM gebräuchlichen Life Cycle Prefix "removed:" versehen, sodass sie als "ehemaliger Standort" weiterhin in der OSM-Datenbank bleiben. Siehe dazu auch hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Berliner_Stra%C3%9Fenbrunnen#Nicht_mehr_vorhandene_bzw._abgebaute_Brunnenstandorte

liebe Grüße
Alex
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-06 03:36:48+00:00): Thank you for mapping. It would be great if you add the changeset comment of what you have added. It seems you have added buildings. Please provide changeset comments. Happy mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150805199
joel56dt (2024-05-04 04:53:28+00:00): Hello,

You dragged the cul-de-sac to the wrong location. Please be careful when editing.

Thanks,
joel56dt
TrickyFoxy (2024-05-05 16:15:24+00:00): Не добавляйте личные заметки в OSM
eggie (2024-05-02 18:44:59+00:00): Hi emret,
I removed building=house from the addressnode.

Greetz,
eggie
Sandal man (2024-05-02 22:03:52+00:00): Thanks for you contribution to the OSM, but there are a lot of mistakes in your edits.
You named a pool? as a pond.
Give a strange name to it "Dining area + communal pool"
Draw a road thru the pool.
Draw a pool and a road in a building.
Can you please edit that ?
Regards Sandalman
Jordi MF (2024-05-02 22:59:39+00:00): Hola greg,

Como te dice Sandalman, deberías de corregir esos errores. La etiqeuta "name" no debe de usarse para aadir nombres descriptivos como "Dining area + communal pool" o "Private pool". Una piscina privada no debe mapearse como "water=pond". Puedes añadir la etiqueta access=private para indicar que es de acceso privado.

Saludos
Osmwithspace (2025-01-24 20:44:19+00:00): Laut Wiki soll statt historic=heritage heritage=* verwendet werden. Willst du dir das nochmal anschauen?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic=heritage
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150806830
Mammi71 (2026-02-14 08:59:37+00:00): Hallo Siegmarer, kannst Du bitte den Gleisanschluss der Hohenzollern AG in OpenHistoricalMap erfassen und hier löschen. ORM kann mittlerweile auch Daten aus OHM auswerten und der Gleisanschluss wurde so gründlich entfernt, dass diese hier in OSM nichts mehr zu suchen haben. Danke.
PS: nur wenn Ihr Bahnhistoriker mitzieht und verschwundene Strecken dort abbildet, wo sie hingehören (OHM) haben andere Strecken, von denen noch Reste sichtbar sind, eine Chance in OSM verbleiben zu können.
Siegmarer (2026-02-14 12:26:00+00:00): Hallo, Danke für die Info. Ich habe mir in Chemnitz in OHM mal ein Testobjekt erzeugt und schaue ob es zeitnah in ORM gerendert wird.
https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/changeset/221993#map=18/50.861448/12.945596&layers=O&date=1986-04-17&daterange=1826-01-01,2026-12-31
Mammi71 (2026-02-14 15:03:27+00:00): Du musst allerdings die OpenRailwayMap.app nutzen
Da ist Dein Testobjekt bereits.
https://openrailwaymap.app/#view=16.11/50.862206/12.946459&date=all

OpenRailwayMap.org kann keinen historischen Kontext anzeigen, da die Kacheln statisch gerendert werden.
Siegmarer (2026-02-14 15:13:58+00:00): Hallo, danke für die Info, dasTestobjekt ist da. Allerdings sehe ich über diesen Link keine razed getaggten Gleise :(.
Mammi71 (2026-02-14 16:00:17+00:00): ORM.app zeigt keine razed Gleise aus OSM an. Perspektivisch werden solche Sachen aus OSM verschwinden, dann werden sie auch ORM.org nicht mehr angezeigt werden. Die fehlenden razed sind halt noch nicht in OHM erfasst. Viel Spaß an langen Winterabenden.
Bringt die Daten zu OHM. Denkt doch mal an massive Bahnhofsumbauten und Gleisverlegungen wie z.B. Hbf Leipzig und Stuttgart. Mit OHM ließe sich das abbilden (ist nur beim editieren schwierig).   OSM und ORM.org können nur alles oder nichts anzeigen, alle Zeitepochen gleichzeitig, übereinander, ohne Zeit-Schieberegler
hatul (2024-05-05 19:51:18+00:00): שלום, מה יש פה? כדאי לפרט
AgusQui (2024-05-02 22:02:39+00:00): Toda la información agregada al edificio de la estación Retiro es innecesaria ya que está contenida en el nodo station que representa a toda la estación. 
Los andenes no tienen nombre por lo tanto no es necesario agregarlo.
mavl (2024-11-13 07:58:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159079753 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-27 22:45:40+00:00): Please don't connect landuse to roads.
rskedgell (2024-05-02 20:38:05+00:00): It's been mapped for 15 years.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27051948

Duplicate deleted.
SomeoneElse (2024-05-03 18:08:31+00:00): Hello,

If buildings like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1279179007 are supposed to be rectangular you can press "q" in the editor after adding the building to make it rectangular.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2024-05-03 18:08:54+00:00): Bonjour,

Si des bâtiments comme https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1279179007 sont censés être rectangulaires, vous pouvez appuyer sur "q" dans l'éditeur après avoir ajouté le bâtiment pour le rendre rectangulaire.
Cordialement,
Andy
Famlam (2024-05-03 20:26:14+00:00): Hi Gerrist, deze nieuw toegevoegde wegen zijn weggetjes die geen ander doel hebben dan parkeren/toegang verschaffen tot de gebouwen waar ze aan liggen, dus dat zou highway=service zijn. Kun je het aanpassen?
MCalaOSM (2024-08-08 05:06:52+00:00): Ciao questo parcheggio e una piazza o semplicemente parcheggio io ho provato dalla foto aerea a mettere parcheggio ed ho aggiunto la strada che lo collega, ma mi rimane il dubbio dalla tua ultima modifica che sia una piazzetta. Un caro saluto
Nino Galante (2024-08-08 06:51:44+00:00): Non ho capito bene quale sia la tua perplessità. In effetti è un "largo", tant'è che nella mia ultima modifica ho modificato nel nome l'attributo da "piazza" a "largo", dopo averlo verificato sulla targa.
MCalaOSM (2024-08-08 07:18:30+00:00): Il punto e: c'è amenity=parking e Place=Square non posso stare nello stesso oggetto descrivono due cose differenti
MCalaOSM (2024-08-08 07:20:31+00:00): Si potrebbe fare lasciare come piazzetta e fare un altro oggetto uguale come parcheggio secondo si risolve così.
Nino Galante (2024-08-08 07:30:24+00:00): Sicuramente è da lasciare Place=square
silversurfer83 (2024-07-22 19:16:15+00:00): Moin :)

ich seh grad, dass du Absperrungen hier eingefügt hast. Bei Baustellen ist es grundsätzlich sehr hilfreich, wenn du an die betroffenen Elemente (hier die Sperren und die Wegabschnitte) eine "note=*" mit einer Erklärung dran machst, damit jeder weiß, warum und wie lange hier (voraussichtlich) gesperrt ist. Gerne mit Link zu einer Meldung von Hessen.mobil oder einer Tageszeitung.
So, wie du das jetzt gemacht hast, ist es sehr schwer nachvollziehbar.

Grüße
silversurfer83
archpdx (2024-06-07 04:39:55+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! It appears that this changeset adds a bar in the middle of Science Grove, however it doesn't look like this is reflected in aerial imagery. Can you confirm whether this was placed in the correct place?
map4e123 (2024-05-30 13:16:56+00:00): Hello, thank you for the contribution. Please pay attention, always add shops and other functions to the address node. Never create a seperate node for a shop - when there are multiple, duplicate the address node.

Can you move the shop info to the address node for the affected data (Bouwman, ALDI, Tegels, etc.)?
map4e123 (2024-05-30 13:23:37+00:00): Übersetzt von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

"Adressen werden auch automatisch zu Eigenschaften hinzugefügt. Wenn Sie einer bestimmten Adresse etwas hinzufügen möchten (z. B. dass sich dort ein Schuhgeschäft befindet), fügen Sie diese Details (d. h. Art des Geschäfts, Name, Website usw.) am besten zum Adressknoten des Geschäfts hinzu. Sie sollten diese Angaben nicht am Gebäude selbst anbringen. Warum? Geschäfte und Restaurants sind nur so lange an eine Adresse gebunden, wie sie besteht; das Gebäude kann Hunderte von Jahren bestehen.

Übersetzt mit DeepL.com (kostenlose Version)"
map4e123 (2024-08-14 08:14:15+00:00): Da es keine Antwort des Verfassers der Stellungnahme gibt, ist davon auszugehen, dass dies behoben werden muss. Bitte achten Sie beim nächsten Mal auf lokale Zuordnungskonventionen, wie Adressen, Art des Geschäfts usw.

Since there is no reply from the contributor: assuming this will have to be fixed. Please, next time pay attention to local mapping conventions, such as addresses, type of store, and so on.
rskedgell (2024-05-02 22:15:24+00:00): Stop trying to cheat at Pokemon Go and grow up.
citrula (2024-05-03 05:42:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150810941
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-05 06:27:30+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150814623

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/beware-of-fake-beaches-pokemon-go/112413/49
tekim (2024-05-04 16:52:26+00:00): It appears you have added a park that doesn't exist. Also, buildings are not landuse=*
tekim (2024-05-04 16:53:29+00:00): reverting fake edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150889538
tekim (2024-05-04 16:50:05+00:00): Hello again JorgeLeo33,  buildings are not landuse=*, they should be tagged building=yes, building=industrial, or other appropriate value.
tekim (2024-05-04 16:53:04+00:00): reverting fake edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150889489