piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
grzegorz75jan (2025-09-05 22:27:42+00:00): Pomnik czy kapliczka.  Z opisu na stronie wynika, że historycznie bardziej pasuje jako kapliczka. 
website raczej do zmiany na url ponieważ nie jest to bezpośrednio strona oficjalna obiektu.
custodiankeyy (2025-09-05 21:15:13+00:00): Merhaba,

İşbirliğini geliştirmek ve düzenlemelerinizi diğerlerinin daha kolay anlayabilmesi için, lütfen değişikliklerinizi yorum alanında kısaca açıklayın. Bu, topluluğun düzenlemelerinizi daha kolay takip etmesini sağlayacaktır. İyi yorumlar hakkında bazı yararlı ipuçlarını aşağıda bulabilirsiniz:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
f4phantom (2025-09-09 14:10:02+00:00): tamam peki.
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-30 13:59:40+00:00): You have changed foot=no or foot=yes to foot=designated incorrectly on several cycleways that are either not open to pedestrians at all, or merely tolerated with no provision, shoulder or sidewalk available.
silversurfer83 (2025-09-05 18:44:54+00:00): Hallo rockhunt,

zuletzt hatte ich dir einen Link zu einem Wikiartikel zur geogr. Größe von Änderungen zukommen lassen.

Heute hätte ich zwei weitere Anmerkungen:

- flood_prone ist eine der Eigenschaften die grundsätzlich als "no" gedacht werden, wenn sie nicht gesetzt sind. Daher wird die Eigenschaft nur gebraucht, wenn wir "yes" setzen würden.

- Du schreibst grundsätzlich "Ergänzungen" als Änderugssatzkommentar. Das ist leider nichtssagend und daher hab ich hier den nächsten Artikel im Wiki für dich:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Wäre schön, wenn du in Zukunft bessere Kommentare hinterlässt. Danke.

happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171510331
eggie (2025-09-05 17:45:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-09-05 17:47:14+00:00): No need to add addresses. Just use the present addressnodes.
greetz,
eggie
WeeTahr (2025-09-05 18:03:29+00:00): Okay thanks, will do that from now
Gwen Bosque Coffe Shop (2025-09-05 17:35:26+00:00): Bagus Tempatnya
zabop (2025-09-05 17:57:00+00:00): Thanks for your edits. Could you add more insightful changeset comments than "edit"?
Thank you!
user_5359 (2025-09-06 12:17:01+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/390137524. what is the mean of the tags
járhatóság = benőtt
járhatóság2 = nehezen járható
?
zabop (2025-09-05 18:00:58+00:00): Please add proper changeset comments. "ф" does not qualify :)
zabop (2025-09-05 17:48:40+00:00): Thank you for your contributions. Could you start adding more descriptive changeset comments than "-"? That helps quality control. Thanks!
JeThy2898 (2025-09-06 10:29:18+00:00): No problem, I will do it in the future!
zabop (2025-09-06 10:49:28+00:00): Thank you! :)
NeisBot (2025-09-05 17:55:35+00:00): Hi Majed_als, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 97% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 highway(s)
- 1 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=171511223
pitscheplatsch (2025-09-05 18:17:54+00:00): Hello Majed,

Thank you for your reply and for explaining the background of your project. I’d like to clarify an important point about OpenStreetMap: the data here is meant to represent the real-world geography as it exists, for everyone’s use. Edits should not be made to fit a particular project’s requirements (such as filtering roads for autonomous cart testing), since this can remove correct data and reduce the map’s usefulness for others.

If your project needs a simplified or customized map (for example, only certain roads or areas), the recommended approach is to download the OSM data and process it locally to fit your needs. That way, you can filter or modify the data for your project without affecting the main OSM database.

Please restore the deleted features, or let the community know if you need help reverting them. If you’re unsure how, I can guide you to the right resources.

Best regards, Pascal
TinPetreković (2025-09-08 13:47:04+00:00): Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171636480
Udarian (2025-09-05 18:14:48+00:00): I doubt that this business takes up this whole building.
vertovian (2025-09-05 18:12:12+00:00): My understanding is that this bidirectional south-side bike lane was temporary, but I'm not sure. The one on the north side of Eglinton which was a sidewalk level MUP, was closed soon after it opened to allow for the Crosstown Extension tunnel boring work. However the south side lanes are superior in many ways, namely in that they actually connect to Weston Rd. (and beyond) while the north side ones ended around Pearen St. I believe there is also a south-side continuation east of Weston under the rail overpass, but I don't see it on recent maps or streetview so I'll have to reconfirm in person.
citrula (2025-09-05 21:46:54+00:00): You added this as a node on the service road. Please consider completing the editor tutorial and add the POI to the actual location.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171518950
Lostmonkey (2025-10-13 08:10:01+00:00): Har slettet navn på cykelreparationsstation. Feltet er ikke til generiske beskrivelser.
Udarian (2025-09-05 18:35:55+00:00): why did you delete the map (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6956220575 ), what is you source for it no longer existing.
ryanlim48 (2025-09-05 18:40:31+00:00): Oh sorry I thought it was a duplicate how can I add it back
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-01 22:09:08+00:00): Oof yeah, uh, you might want to use an editor that visualizes lanes when editing streets with lanes... the main street bike lanes got pretty bashed up and duplicated with this one.
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-01 22:29:40+00:00): Got it fixed.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-05 18:30:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1427361250

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Hufkratzer (2025-09-05 20:25:34+00:00): Hi,
You have tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1427363779 as a horse riding centre (leisure=horse_riding), but is probably just a horse riding arena, the one from https://www.canyonbc.ca/?page=horse. Horse riding arenas are usually tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/837980897
jake-low (2025-09-08 23:25:59+00:00): I merged this trailhead with the other POI for the same trailhead nearby
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171513664
jake-low (2025-09-08 23:25:36+00:00): I fixed a typo in this trailhead's name ("Alum Cave Trailhead Trailhead")
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171513674
jake-low (2025-09-08 06:49:20+00:00): I don't think this campground exists; the linked webpage says dispersed camping is available along the riverbank and floodplains, but this precise location isn't a campground.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171513997
jake-low (2025-09-08 23:11:02+00:00): FYI, it looks like this changeset accidentally included a couple of redundant trailhead nodes. I've edited them again to fix this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171514109
silversurfer83 (2025-09-05 20:19:56+00:00): Hallo Meinreal,

du fügst in unregelmäßigen Abständen neue POI mit der app OrganicMaps hinzu. Du gibst an, dass hier aktive Supermärkte sind.

Bei einigen POI hast du auch eine Website angegeben. Diese lädt nicht.

Wenn ich mir die Daten hier in Wuppertal ansehe, dann gibt es auch einen ehem. Real in diesem Gebäude, was deinen Punkt zu einer Doppelung machen würde.

Sei doch bitte so nett und erkläre uns, was genau du hier tust, da wir uns gerade keinen Reim darauf machen können.

Grüße
silversurfer83
silversurfer83 (2025-09-14 19:39:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171934103
jake-low (2025-09-08 23:05:13+00:00): FYI, I've removed this trailhead since it doesn't meet OSM's definition (a place where someone could start a hike or journey), since it's deep in the wilderness at the USFS/NPS boundary. This was an issue with the source dataset, not with your edit. Thanks for your contributions!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171514231
jake-low (2025-09-08 06:22:44+00:00): Hello, thanks for your contribution.

I've deleted this campground because it does not appear to exist based on any available satellite imagery. As mentioned in the MapRoulette challenge instructions, please make sure the campground actually exists before adding it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171514485
jake-low (2025-09-08 06:11:27+00:00): Note: I made a follow-up edit to reattach the trail to the road network, to make sure routing will work in navigation apps
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171514539
jake-low (2025-09-08 06:00:54+00:00): FYI, I've removed this particular trailhead because it doesn't meet OSM's definition of a trailhead (a place where someone could start a hike or other journey), because it's deep in the wilderness at the NPS/USFS boundary. Thanks for all your edits on the trailhead mapping project!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171514641
elvee@AT (2025-09-08 16:44:49+00:00): Thank you! I should have flagged that for human review because I was on the fence. They have it on their website despite not being accessible by road, which seemed odd! https://www.nps.gov/places/000/bridger-lake-trailhead-6k4.htm
jake-low (2025-09-08 05:58:25+00:00): Just FYI, it looks like you accidentally added two trailhead nodes for the same object in this edit. I've made a follow-up edit and merged them together. Thanks for all of your contributions!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171514663
citrula (2025-09-05 21:42:49+00:00): If you aren't sure about the actual extent of the campground, please add it as a node instead of drawing a random shape.
jake-low (2025-09-08 05:41:27+00:00): This campground doesn't appear to exist at all, I've deleted it (I'm the author of the MapRoulette task this edit was associated with, and am reviewing all contributions)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171514696
Udarian (2025-09-05 20:09:32+00:00): the location seems incorrect as I don't see any evidence of a camp ground at this location
jake-low (2025-09-08 05:30:49+00:00): I agree; I've removed this campground (I'm the author of the MapRoulette task this contribution was associated with, and am in the process of reviewing features that were added)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171514788
felipeeugenio (2025-09-06 00:28:36+00:00): Hola. Se refiere a que no se puede caminar por la vía? o que no hay veredas?
Si es lo segundo entonces es sidewalk=no.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171514792
conico52 (2025-09-06 22:06:00+00:00): serían los 2 en realidad, pero buen dato el de sidewalk no lo sabia
bdentremont (2025-09-07 19:42:45+00:00): Christophermendoza510:
I've just reverted the renaming of San Lorenzo Creek to "hayward ca" after seeing it flagged as a mistake.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4949922

I see you are brand new to OSM.  Can I help you with what you were intending to edit?
eggie (2025-09-05 20:23:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Wat is de reden om het trottoir te verwijderen? Is dat in het veld ook verwijderd?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
mijlpaal (2025-09-11 08:46:24+00:00): Goededag!
Ik had nog niet gereageerd. 
Het trottoir is verwijderd door de gemeente in het voorjaar, dus die loopt niet meer vanaf de bushalte naar de kleine driesprong van trottoirs naar de andere bushalte (mooiland).
MVG
Rick
eggie (2025-09-11 08:48:04+00:00): Oke... duidelijk.
Mapse
eggie
A67-A67 (2025-09-05 20:31:58+00:00): 

In deze wijziging wordt niet alleen de winkel, maar ook het adres verwijderd. Dat is incorrect, omdat het adres nog steeds bestaat.

Als je een POI (winkel/horeca e.d.) verwijderd, graag alleen de tags die met de POI te maken hebben verwijderen en de tags beginnend met addr: en de source=BAG en source_date laten staan.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 18:19:13+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13121747306/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit
What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then?
TinPetreković (2025-09-08 13:51:00+00:00): Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171636700
demon_box (2025-09-06 17:27:03+00:00): Hi dandreis, for this object
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373441206
I would like to point out that in Italy the street number identifies the access point (entrance) and NOT the entire building. In fact, a building can have multiple entrances and consequently multiple street numbers. 
So you have 2 options: 
1. If you know exactly the position (entrance) of the street number you are mapping, put all the address tags on a node on the perimeter of the building (also adding the entrance tag on the same node); 
2. If you do not have this precise information, you must put all the address tags on an adjacent node but DETACHED from the polygon of the building. 
I have already made the necessary corrections. 
Thanks and Happy Mapping!
dandreis (2025-09-07 11:17:03+00:00): Dear demon_box. Your updated corrections on via Bonincunter are not correct. I know exactly this place. If you prefer to keep an incorrect map, go ahead. I won’t make any further changes that someone unfamiliar with the area might mistakenly alter. Thank you
demon_box (2025-09-07 11:25:23+00:00): Hi dandreis, I don't understand you, I had only move the addr: tags on bulding on a separeted node...
What would be the incorrect changes on "Via Bonincunter"??
dandreis (2025-09-08 16:38:09+00:00): Dear demon_box, I apologize for the harsh response. Thank you for your support.
TinPetreković (2025-09-08 13:54:08+00:00): Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171636868
TinPetreković (2025-09-08 14:05:15+00:00): Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171637478
InsertUser (2025-09-13 19:16:10+00:00): Please use different changesets for uploads in different continents. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
karitotp (2025-09-13 22:17:02+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out. It was an slip while mapping different projects.
A67-A67 (2025-09-05 20:27:34+00:00): De correcte tag om dit aan te geven is cuisine=friture. De diet:*-tags zijn voor bepaalde diëten zoals diet:vegan en diet:halal. Ik heb het verbeterd.
TinPetreković (2025-09-08 14:10:02+00:00): Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171637751
TinPetreković (2025-09-08 14:27:19+00:00): Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171638640
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-05 20:31:07+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8593062338
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/925950148

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-09-06 09:04:48+00:00): naprawione
zuzak (2025-09-06 10:24:41+00:00): Hey -- thanks for this! If they're those cabinets you might want to additionally tag these ways as `building=service` (power=substation alone would imply the grounds of a substation)
Raemond (2025-09-06 20:28:27+00:00): Thanks, that's a big help. I've changed these.
user_5359 (2025-09-07 12:43:34+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13121807935, https://www.osm.org/node/13121807931 . What is the mean of the tag guyes = yes?
PluMGMK (2025-09-07 13:21:30+00:00): Oops, typo! Should be guyed=yes
Thanks for pointing it out!
ilias_ (2025-09-05 23:02:53+00:00): what a bbox
webeafix (2025-09-06 18:08:13+00:00): Indeed! I added several items via Street Complete, and some are far apart from each other.
ilias_ (2025-09-06 19:42:07+00:00): I guessed so.

Please avoid doing it.
webeafix (2025-09-06 20:17:19+00:00): Noted, thanks
Mannivu (2025-09-06 15:10:01+00:00): Ciao, a proposito dell'incrocio in 42.367249, 12.598105 dato che non ci sono elementi fisici a separare la strada, è tecnicamente incorretto suddividerla per le varie corsie di immissione e svolta.
Jacopo (2025-09-06 15:14:01+00:00): Ciao, andhe in caso come questo in cui le corsie portano comunque un valore informativo? Tipo instradamento e restrizioni di svolta? 
In ogni caso se ritieni che non sia corretto reverta pure il changeset, nessun problema da parte mia :)
Mannivu (2025-09-06 15:17:29+00:00): Sì, per convenzione vanno divise solo se sono fisicamente divise in strada. Per le informazioni sulle corsie si possono usare i tag lanes:backward/forward.
b-jazz (2025-09-06 17:08:35+00:00): Hey NJ,

I'm going to revert these changes as they are incorrect. It's not really your fault, as iD (the editor that you used) doesn't make it obvious that these were already fairways. They are part of a "multipolygon" relation where the fairway and green are paired together and everything inside the fairway EXCEPT the green defines the fairway. 

In the future, if you see what looks like a fairway and iD claims it is a "Line", check first to see if it is part of a relation.

I'm going to try to create a wiki page to better describe this. This is what I have so far: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID_understanding_golf_course_relations
user_5359 (2025-09-07 09:54:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your business to the correct building.
Erelen (2025-09-05 23:20:35+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_aerial_imagery
"In any case, do not rush to move objects created by others! Make sure your offset is more accurate" ... "Start moving objects on the map if you are completely sure your offset is accurate."

You are completely sure that current ESRI with zero offset (your movement completely matches it) is accurate? Based on what data?

2) This grass exists in real world:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222228727
Why you delete it?
Erelen (2025-09-05 23:22:59+00:00): JFYI: current ESRI has offset and (!) distortion (so, offset is different in different parts of the city).
eggie (2025-09-06 06:34:15+00:00): Hi I merged your info with the present addressnode.
Greetz,
eggie
gscholz (2026-01-07 09:38:33+00:00): Hi DF45,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding a broken forest relation, which lost its outer perimeter:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=2.04798&lat=47.66345&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/534418/history#map=13/47.66215/2.04620

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
DF45 (2026-01-07 12:59:20+00:00): Hi Guido,
I think I found the problem.
But it might take some time till Osmose get the change.
Thank you for the notice.
This is due to giant Landsat Mega-polygones who were automatically created and are too big ... for humans ;-)
Best wishes for 2026,
DF45
gscholz (2026-01-07 13:10:09+00:00): Thanks for your quick response.
Guido
gscholz (2026-01-10 07:53:32+00:00): Hi DF45, 
this error still exited until today, so I have fixed this now. May be you can switch to JOSM to edit relations properly, it makes life much easier.
Guido
jake-low (2025-09-08 02:00:34+00:00): FYI, I removed this trailhead (similar to another one you added that I also commented on). Nothing wrong with your edit, just that while NPS considers this a "trailhead" because it's at the edge of their management area, it's deep in the wilderness and isn't considered a trailhead by OSM since it's not a place people can start a journey.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171518799
Myazyk (2025-09-27 11:15:41+00:00): Ростиславе, то дуже добре, що ти вирішив покращити мапу рідного села, але постарайся робити це акуратніше, вивчивши інструменти редагування.

До речі, ФАП потрібно було не видаляти, а перенести в інше місце
Duja (2026-01-22 14:35:21+00:00): Možemo li se dogovoriti da urbane biciklističko-pešačke staze budu cycleway a ne path?

Znam da je to path u JOSM presetu, ali nije i u iD presetu, i generalno je kontroverzno tagovanje. A po ovom pitanju imam baš isključiv stav da ne može da bude path i uspon na Rtanj i asfaltirana, projektovana gradska infrastruktura.
jake-low (2025-09-08 01:55:20+00:00): I moved the trailhead to beside the parking area, and retagged this point as an unmarked crossing
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171518905
infeeeee (2025-09-09 21:18:30+00:00): Szia!
Ezeket miért toltad odébb? gondolom véletlenül. Legközelebb óvatosabban. Visszavonva.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171707208
jake-low (2025-09-08 01:41:32+00:00): Thanks for all your edits to add missing trailhead nodes! I've reviewed many of them and they look great. Just wanted to let you know that I deleted this one; this "trailhead" was present in the NPS dataset but I don't think it qualifies as a trailhead in OSM's definition since there's no trail system that you can access from this point (just a very short footpath to a historic site). Nothing wrong with your edit, just a quirk in the data source we have been using that I've been correcting during review.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171519013
jake-low (2025-09-08 01:41:36+00:00): Thanks for all your edits to add missing trailhead nodes! I've reviewed many of them and they look great. Just wanted to let you know that I deleted this one; this "trailhead" was present in the NPS dataset but I don't think it qualifies as a trailhead in OSM's definition since there's no trail system that you can access from this point (just a very short footpath to a historic site). Nothing wrong with your edit, just a quirk in the data source we have been using that I've been correcting during review.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171519013
infeeeee (2025-09-09 21:15:08+00:00): Szia!
Ezzel a szerkesztéssel egész Biatorbágyot parkká alakítottad. Legközelebb óvatosabban. Visszavonva.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171707118