piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BoNero (2025-05-07 15:12:07+00:00): Added track of a previous existing path, forgotten in the last years but recently cleaned.
BoNero (2025-05-07 15:14:45+00:00): 1374691429, v1
Taya_S (2025-04-04 14:13:09+00:00): Hello yaroslavrepin2013,

Could you explain why this residential landuse was unnecessary? Deleting valid data is generally not a good idea.

Taya Snijder, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
Taya_S (2025-04-07 09:53:36+00:00): Restored residential landuses that were deleted with no good reason

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164625692
Frans S (2025-04-07 14:41:02+00:00): Hello, Thanks for mapping.
Please pay more attention to accurate mapping.  A number of buildings are not mapped as they should be.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-04-07 14:48:34+00:00): Sorry. Forget my previous message.
I used the Esri imagery to review your work.
Best regards
mavl (2025-04-04 12:33:15+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, зачем вы удаляете области landuse=residential?
fortera_au (2025-04-04 12:16:46+00:00): Looks like the whole thing is already tagged with railway:preserved=yes anyway, which I think is preferred over using railway=preserved for historic railways that are still used like Pichi Richi and the Cockle Train.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164505084
dcapillae (2025-04-04 12:42:47+00:00): Véase discusión en conjunto de cambios nr. 164502610: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164502610
MapSpot (2025-04-14 14:28:13+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for helping specify which roads are private in your area. In the future, please use the tag "access=private" on the roadway line itself, rather than marking individual points on the roadway with "private=yes".

Private=yes is a non-standard tag that is not recognized by any routing systems. If only pard of the road is private, you can split the roadway using the X key. I have made the correction already for the three locations you've edited last week, and if you have any questions, you can reply here or message me.

Happy mapping
Andre68 (2025-04-05 07:36:00+00:00): Ui... Was ist denn da passiert?
Da sind etliche Wege mit einem Versatz von ca. 2km neu angelegt worden!
Leider wurden auch Relationen verändert, sodass ein Revert des Changeset schwierig ist...
Bitte zeitnah korrigieren!
Andre68 (2025-04-05 08:45:40+00:00): Ich habe es jetzt selbst geschafft, die fälschlich duplizierten Wege zu entfernen.
Siehe Änderungssatz 164540828.
m_a_si (2025-04-05 08:47:01+00:00): Die Fahrtstrecke der einzelnen Linienvarianten wurde der tatsächlichen Wegstrecke angepasst.
Welche Relationen außer der betroffenen Buslinien sind noch betroffen?
Andre68 (2025-04-05 09:13:06+00:00): Letztlich keine.
Es scheint, dass die Relation 18661273 gedoppelt wurde. Die neue Relation war 18941744. Die habe ich jetzt wieder gelöscht, da auch alle Elemente darin gedoppelt waren.
Ich habe die beiden Relationen jetzt auch verglichen. Es gab dort keine Änderungen. Die Anzahl der Einträge und die Attribute sind identisch.
m_a_si (2025-04-05 09:30:33+00:00): Danke für deine Aufklärung. Es kann gut sein, dass ich die Relation versehentlich dupliziert habe. Das hätte JOSM eigentlich beim Upload anmerken müssen.
jmapb (2025-04-04 23:33:28+00:00): Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset 164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group
NeisBot (2025-04-04 12:41:35+00:00): Hi kjm1511, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 8 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=164506278
kjm1511 (2025-04-04 12:43:53+00:00): These deletions are intentional, please remove.
NeisReview (2025-04-04 18:29:04+00:00): Thank you for your private message and also confirming that your deletions were intentional.

However, do you know the following OSM wiki page? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
MassCartog (2025-04-05 02:07:57+00:00): This change set along with the other two 164506799 164506908 look disastrous. kjm1511 Did you mean to leave random trail segments floating in the middle of the woods? also there are a TON of places trails almost meet, but are not connected. Looks like you took a hack saw to the trail network breaking all routing in this area. Right now it looks like a ton of trails just dead end and a biker would have to go back the way they came. Is this correct?
MassCartog (2025-04-09 14:43:05+00:00): Thanks for fixing!
SomeoneElse (2025-04-12 14:55:12+00:00): Hello,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.  We've often worked with land managers about helping understand why "just deleting the data" may not be the best approach.
The first and most obvious reason is that someone who doesn't know the history might just "re add" it based on aerial imagery or even something like Strava.  The best thing to do might be to leave something there that accurately reflects the situation on the ground.  That might be:
* highway=path with access tags set to "no" if there is something physically there but it is not open to the public.
* informal=yes if what is there was created informally
* Instead of "highway", set a tag such as "disused:highway" if nature is being allowed to reclaim what was there.
If you've got any more questions you can email us at data@openstreetmap.org with a subject line of "[Ticket#2025040410000312] kjm1511".  Another set of people who may be able to offer advice is the OSMUS Trails Working Group - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States#Trails_Working_Group .
Best Regards,
Andy
ivanbranco (2026-06-27 13:23:01+00:00): Hi Arie den Boon,

you changed two building=yes into fountain=toret. This is strange since is a fountain typical from northern italy. Could you take a look please?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1374616611
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1374616613
Arie den Boon (2026-06-27 20:49:38+00:00): You are right, I have changed both tags into building=yes. Strange error...
Frans S (2025-04-04 14:06:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Your mappings here are very basic. Just a (large) rectangular around a complex building. Please follow the rooflines and where trees cover it, just extrapolate the roofline.
Another building is mapped way to big. 
Check this webpage. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=164510334
My adjustments are in green.
Best regards and improve you mappings.
aixbrick (2025-04-04 14:53:32+00:00): Hello,
what is your source for the new address?
Regards
bxl-forever (2025-04-04 13:00:13+00:00): Duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6037623048
npettiaux (2025-04-04 16:16:05+00:00): Dear bxl-forever, thanks for the note. I am a beginner with the application everydoor that I have used. I tried to edit the other node that is misplaced and incomplete. Mine is perfectly locatedd (I have been next to the tomb while I mapped it). How can the 2 be joined ?
As I have mentionned in the OSM channel on element, I plan to map, possibly with students, a number of tombs of this cimetery and I am looking for recommendations. Thanks
bxl-forever (2025-04-04 17:19:49+00:00): I merged both nodes.  Basically, we re-use the existing node but the inscription tag you collected was added to it.  I checked on aerial imagery and the white stone is clearly visible: the location from your survey is perfect, so I moved the old node to this location.

Small tasks like this can easily be done in any desktop editor like JOSM or iD.  Don’t worry, it was really easy to fix.
jperl13 (2025-04-04 12:57:45+00:00): Astillero de construcción Naval tanto civil como militar.
jmapb (2025-04-04 23:33:37+00:00): Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset 164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group
Frans S (2025-04-04 14:10:12+00:00): Please do not upload a single building at the time where more buildings are to be mapped.
On this way, you receive the status 'advanced' however not the experience and skills.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-04-04 13:27:55+00:00): Thanks for mapping. Please square each rectangular building with the Q key. You mapped 1 odd shaped building. Partly covered by trees.
Just try to extrapolate the roofline.
Check also existing mappings. If they don't comply with the current situation, adjust them then.
Best regards and keep mapping
jmapb (2025-04-04 23:33:44+00:00): Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset 164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
jmapb (2025-04-04 23:33:49+00:00): Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset 164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
jmapb (2025-04-04 23:33:55+00:00): Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset 164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group
Taya_S (2025-04-06 10:25:02+00:00): reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164583501
jmapb (2025-04-04 23:34:01+00:00): Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset 164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group
Krunch_ (2025-04-22 19:11:26+00:00): This change duplicates some buildings. For example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114928246
Krunch_ (2025-04-22 19:15:47+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165300959 but there may be other buildings or features with the same problem.
Glassman (2025-04-04 14:42:51+00:00): I'm having trouble translating the name:th-Latn you added. Neither Google or Deepl give a useful translations.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164509049
NeisReview (2025-04-04 18:44:20+00:00): #NoTags

Hi, welcome to OSM.

I've reviewed your latest map edits and it seems that this changeset you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
NeisReview (2025-04-04 18:44:53+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164514123

#hotosm
NeatNit (2025-04-04 23:33:45+00:00): זהירות! בטעות שינית את מספר התחנה של "שחמון/קטורה" מ-10261 ל-1026. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5210728947
jmapb (2025-04-04 23:34:07+00:00): Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset 164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group
jmapb (2025-04-04 23:34:14+00:00): Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset 164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group
jmapb (2025-04-04 23:34:19+00:00): Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset 164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group
jmapb (2025-04-04 23:34:25+00:00): Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset 164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group
Hery miantra (2025-04-08 07:18:29+00:00): fkt ambodikavola ,mais non pas fkt ambatovory#UF_EMIT
Nathan_A_RF (2025-04-11 15:22:46+00:00): Hi, you don't need to add these. The maxspeed:type tag implies national speed limits for other classes of vehicles.
Rob Crawford (2025-04-11 19:34:42+00:00): Hello, I was hoping to use the maps to create speed reports for PSV's which is 50 mph on single carriageway roads. Otherwise it will assume the national speed limit which is 60 mph
Nathan_A_RF (2025-04-11 21:58:14+00:00): The tag maxspeed:type=GB:nsl_single identifies the road as being subject to the national speed limit, and as such indicates lower speed limits for different classes of vehicle. It is not required for extra tags for buses, HGVs etc to be added to every single road.
jmapb (2025-04-04 23:34:31+00:00): Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset 164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group
jmapb (2025-04-04 23:34:36+00:00): Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset 164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group
jmapb (2025-04-04 23:34:42+00:00): Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset 164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group
jmapb (2025-04-04 23:34:52+00:00): Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset 164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 00:14:48+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17507
StC (2025-04-11 17:11:27+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
Esperanza36 (2025-04-11 17:27:45+00:00): Merci !
totera (2026-06-11 16:48:37+00:00): Ciao dp7, a proposito di https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1374738159/history/1 highway=services si usa per le aree di servizio lungo autostrade o altre strade a doppia carreggiata in cui ci sono posti per mangiare, bagni pubblici, parcheggi, ecc. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservices), quindi non di certo per un semplice distributore in ambito urbano.
Per l'intera superficie degli impianti di distribuzione carburante si può usare landuse=retail (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuel#The_entire_area_of_the_gas_station).
dp7 (2026-06-11 17:52:13+00:00): Ciao totera, ti ringrazio per questa precisazione: ammetto di non essermi mai posto il problema, considerando tutti i distributori come aree di servizio. 
In effetti la differenziazione ha senso, ma a questo punto non è più appropriato aggiungere amenity=fuel al generico landuse=retail ?
totera (2026-06-11 22:51:58+00:00): L'uso combinato di amenity e landuse è segnalato come errore da Osmose... quindi amenity=fuel dovrebbe andare su un nodo o su un'area più ridotta rispetto al landuse=retail
NeisReview (2025-04-04 18:36:36+00:00): #NameTag

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I’ve taken a look at your recent edits, especially those involving name tags. Some of the names you’ve added caught my attention, as they seem a bit unusual. As noted in the OSM Wiki, the name tag should contain only the actual name of the feature—not descriptions, types, locations, family names, addresses, or other attributes.

Could you please confirm whether these entries were intentional or possibly added by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

---
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:name

#hotosm
kaltuna (2025-04-05 06:49:24+00:00): Hallo, deine Änderungen habe ich rückgängig gemacht. Du hast ein Wohnhaus in der Straße "Am Stadtpfad"  mit der Adresse Praunheimer Straße geändert. Du wolltest offensichtlich ein Gewerbe eintragen. Das macht man am besten mit einem Punkt an dem Ort, wo es sich befindet. Wenn Du Hilfe brauchst, sag Bescheid.
Kuechegemacht (2025-04-06 11:55:59+00:00): Danke
Frans S (2025-05-05 08:59:45+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
Please tag paths just as highway=yes instead of addr:street= footpath.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-05-05 09:01:51+00:00): Some mapping hints

    Buildings can be very close to each other, but in most cases do not actually touch each other - Try to map buildings close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes. Zooming some more can help you. If you made a mistake, you can also disconnect features:
        In iD: select the feature and press 'D'. This "disconnects" nodes. Press now 'M' and move your selected feature.
        In JOSM: selecting the feature and press ‘G’. This "un-glues" connected nodes, and you are now able to move the feature you want.

    Most buildings are rectangular, so make buildings rectangular even if a shadow, tree or roof pitch make it appear otherwise.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2025-05-05 09:03:30+00:00): About tagging of walls.
Just tag walls as barrier=wall
Don't add a tag area=yes to it.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-05-05 10:05:09+00:00): Hello again.
Please do not add a layer to a building. (to hide an error?) 
Layers are mostly used on river/road crossings, where a road gets a tag layer=1 where it is a bridge. 
Best regards
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:24:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
BCNorwich (2025-04-07 06:07:35+00:00): Duplicated sections of highway removed.
NeisBot (2025-04-04 14:48:34+00:00): Hi Galatastic, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 97 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=164512968
NeisReview (2025-04-04 18:32:37+00:00): Thank you for your private message and confirming that you deletions were intentional.

#hotosm
FajrAl (2025-04-09 03:53:21+00:00): Halo pengguna @Horible_4, mohon konfirmasi hasil pemetaan yang Anda lakukan terkait beberapa jalur energi listrik tegangan tinggi. Apakah semua atau beberapa tersebut merupakan rencana? Saya menemukan salah satu GITET Ciseeng 500kv yang Anda petakan namun belum ada eksistingnya, mohon konfirmasi. 

Hello user @horible_4, please confirm the results of the mapping that you do related to several high -voltage electrical energy paths. Are all or some of these part of planning/proposed? I found one of the 500KV Ciseeng Gitet that you map but there is no existing, please confirm.
FajrAl (2025-04-30 12:55:48+00:00): Halo pengguna @Horible_4, saya masih menunggu balasannya ya.

Hello user @horible_4, I'm expecting for the reply.
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-04 15:01:01+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/977870361

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
garfild1994 (2025-04-04 16:15:48+00:00): Dzięki! Poprawiłem. Jak możesz popraw mnie jeszcze w kwestii adresów - wprowadziłem go zarówno w obiekt jak i punkt adresowy. Czy zasadne jest tego powielanie? A jeśli nie to, co wybrać?
Srdjan023 (2025-04-16 12:46:56+00:00): I was on that train and railway is very mush electrified otherwise it wouldn't work.
Srdjan023 (2025-04-16 12:47:53+00:00): Here is a video from a cab, in which you can see that the railway is electrified https://youtu.be/T0jE1b9A3HM
balint36 (2025-04-16 14:16:46+00:00): That's a DMU (diesel and not electric) on the video.
However the source states it's not powerded therefore it's still under construction so the construction:electrified=contact_line is the best in this situation.
balint36 (2025-04-16 14:17:55+00:00): Oh and by the way. You forgot to mention how did you observe the fully constructed ETCS L1.
Srdjan023 (2025-04-17 17:56:17+00:00): I really did not know that contact lines do not work, from what I could see they looked finished. I just thought that our state-owned train operator runs diesels trains because they don't have electric ones.

I think that I just accidentally overwrote the old ETCS tag when I removed construction: part from railways.
Glassman (2025-04-06 18:02:48+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164514128
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-04-09 20:32:04+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164742097
Glassman (2025-04-06 18:05:13+00:00): #TIP: use a brief descriptive changeset description like "added road"

Also, instead of deleting an existing feature try to just change it's geometry. That saves the history of the feature.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164515338
silversurfer83 (2025-04-04 20:48:18+00:00): Hi :)

das PC2 kann vmtl. in short_name=* verschoben werden, oder was soll das bedeuten?

Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164515865
rotes_pferd (2025-04-07 12:45:47+00:00): Das ergibt absolut Sinn, besten Dank für den Hinweis. Das werde ich nachpflegen.
silversurfer83 (2025-04-07 14:51:40+00:00): Immer gerne. Danke für die schnelle Reaktion :)
nilloc29 (2026-02-16 02:29:45+00:00): I found a point for a Fir Creek Recreation Area NW of Leavenworth on the Little Wenatchee. You were the last editor. I left a note at the location. I am very certain that the recreation area does not exist at that location. I worked for the USFS on that ranger district in 2018 and have visited that area.
OddlyAngled (2026-02-16 06:46:45+00:00): this was an automated edit, but from what I can tell this:
* was on a USGS map (https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/StagedProducts/Maps/HistoricalTopo/PDF/WA/250000/WA_Wenatchee_244605_1957_250000_geo.pdf as an example)
* made its way into GNIS (though has since been rescinded, all parks have been removed)
* then copied into GeoNames, Wikidata, Wikipedia

so... probably was a real thing of some sort 50-70 years ago, and is now difficult to completely scrub.

as for OSM: prob start with adding a lifecycle prefix to destroyed: or something? I can update OSM and Wikidata if you can't but don't have delete access to Geonames.
nilloc29 (2026-02-16 08:06:05+00:00): I do not know how to edit Wikidata. If you could do the necessary edits I would appreciate it. 

I looked at the map you linked. I am unsure what it might have referred to. The Soda Springs, Lake Creek, and Rainy Creek campgrounds exist. Maybe the cluster of all three was a "recreation area". The official USFS Topo map does not show anything.

I am using to online editor to manually reroute forest roads using LIDAR and referring to a USFS Roads Layer.
nilloc29 (2026-02-16 08:18:27+00:00): The other two Nodes are also errors.

The "Chelan County Park" is on private land and...

The "Nalon Creek Game Preserve" is actually refers to this. https://co.chelan.wa.us/natural-resources/pages/nason-ridge-community-forest
OddlyAngled (2026-02-16 18:39:14+00:00): my guess is Nalon was a typo of "Nason Creek Game Reserve" https://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/law/WSRAgencyFilings/Community,%20Trade%20and%20Economic%20Development,%20Department%20of/2138.pdf - abolished in 1968, replaced with a bow and arrow hunting zone.

I couldn't find anything regarding Chelan County Park. I assume it was incorrectly placed there on some old map that the GNIS team added. since they've rescinded all of the park IDs it's probably not something they'd research now. I'd just retag with a `was:` prefix, otherwise it'll probably show up again in the future due to GeoNames.
nilloc29 (2026-02-16 21:06:46+00:00): I can retag them. I just looked up how to do it. Thank you.