piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
maraf24 (2023-02-09 16:17:34+00:00): "Umieściłem adres na obszarze ponieważ na budynku był inny numer."

Żartujesz? Widziełeś, że adres z RSPO jest trefny i mimo to go wprowadziłeś?
Nie umieszczamy adresów na obszarach poza wyjątkowymi sytuacjami, a to nie jest taka sytuacja. Przedszkole ma nr 21b - https://pstyszowce.bip.lubelskie.pl/?id=6

"chodzą różne budynki z różnymi adresami "

I te budynki z adresami tam były. Po co robisz obszar z fałszywym adresem?

"przebiegają granice zespołu szkół "
Granica zespołu jest taka, jak zaznaczony obszar. To, że na jego terenie są także inne POI niczego nie zmienia.
Mam wrażenie, że nie rozumiesz do czego służą tagi addr:*
To nie jest adres kontaktowy, tylko adres nieruchomości (prawie zawsze budynku) w miejscu umiejscowienia tego adresu.

A to nie są jedyne błędne edycje szkół, jakie zauważyłem: w innych miejscach widziałem - zmiana name na oficjalną wersję, błędne przesuwanie danych szkoły z węzła na obszar (szkoła zajmuje tylko część). 

To się kwalifikuje na revert.
Mariusz189 (2023-02-11 20:16:15+00:00): Co ty człowieku robisz ? czemu skasowałeś numer telefonu ze szkoły oraz skasowałeś numer rspo? to jest wandalizm!
Osoba która stworzyła projekt dodawania danych rspo wytłumaczyła mi żeby ten adres zostawiać i nie jest to błędem, ponieważ często jeśli nie ma adresu razem z name szkoły to ta strona jak i inne błędnie zaciągają adres albo go wcale nie pokazują. 
Na wiki jest napisane "Nie jest błędem dodawanie tagów adresu również do obiektu." https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Pl:Key:addr:*&uselang=pl
teren szkoły jest obiektem szkolnym, budynek szkoły nie jest jedynym obiektem szkoły więc dodawanie adresu do terenu szkoły nie jest błędem. 
Częściej się spotykałem z tym że adres szkoły według geoportalu był błędny a dane rspo miały właściwy adres.
maraf24 (2023-02-15 23:01:38+00:00): Przypomina, że wykonujesz import. I to w większości nieprzedyskutowany - bo zmiana i dodawanie adresów jak i dodawanie szkół nie było w dyskusji.
Tak więc cała odpowiedzialność spada na Ciebie, a skutkiem błędów  może być utrata całości danych - i to nie tylko w jednym zestawie, ale wielu - i to także w zestawach nie dotyczących szkół.
Bo jednym z obowiązków importer jest używanie dedykowanego konta -właśnie na wypadek rewertów.
Nikt nie ma obowiązku poprawiania Twoich importów - ale ty masz prawo je poprawiać.
Jeśli więc robisz błędy, to jest sam popraw. A jeśli nie chcesz, to nie dziw się, że dane znikną. I to wszystkie, a nie nie tylko błędne.
To jest oficjalna metoda OSM praktywkowana przez DWG. 
I przestań cytować wyrwane z kontekstu cytaty z wiki. Wiki, szczególnie polskie, ani nie jest poprawnie napisane ani aktualne.

Na koniec dodam, że skandalem jest dla mnie, że gdy piszę, iż przedszkole nie ma adresu, który mu nadałeś i przedstawiam na to dowód, to nie widzę z Twojej strony  edycji poprawiającej. Na co czekasz? Aż wszyscy konsumenci danych zassą błędnę informacje? Ja mam to poprawiać? Ja to mogę zreverterować. Może wyciągniesz wnioski na przyszłość.
J-MUC (2023-01-16 21:06:39+00:00): Apologies for the large bounding box of this changeset, I had not realized I had other changes in the editor still awaiting upload...
eggie (2023-01-17 06:26:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  name=Stables verwijderd. Gebruik name= niet om iets te beschrijven. Je kunt evt description gebruiken.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131353357


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
maro21 (2023-01-17 21:43:32+00:00): Na pewno location=indoor? Nie umieściłeś go w obrysie budynku, a na zdjęciach widać kostkę
Szymson (2023-01-18 12:55:58+00:00): Las przestał się renderować. Sprawdź czy gdzieś nie uszkodziłeś relacji multipolygon.
muchichka_s (2023-01-17 23:11:28+00:00): Для чого ти пересовуєш дороги, подивися strava, GPS треки. Після твоїх "покращень" це все треба буде пересовувати назад
JasonBob (2023-01-16 23:06:57+00:00): There is no evidence that this park is named Granada Square. I reverted the unnecessary change.
troglobiont (2023-01-19 11:13:48+00:00): Die Sperre hier ist sehr wahrscheinlich korrekt, 
die beiden Notes https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3095646
und 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3095645
auf die sich der vorherige Mapper bezieht erwähnen Stacheldrahtabsperrungen auf einer Weide, am Luftbild sieht man keine Begehungsspuren und nach der Strava-Heatmap 
https://nakarte.me/#m=16/47.44288/15.26364&l=O/Sr
wird über die Straßenkehre östlich ausgewichen. Auch in der ÖAV-Wegedatenbank https://www.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/6974b375d78f4eee866b317dca159d4f 
verläuft der Weg über die Straße.
Ich ändere solche Sachen normalerweise nicht ohne Prüfung vor Ort, hier schauts aber wirklich so aus als ob sich die Wanderwegsroute geändert hat.
troglobiont (2023-01-19 11:22:22+00:00): Ich hab jetzt die Wanderwegsroute korrigiert, ob eine ausgeschilderte Sperre vorhanden ist, muss man sich vor Ort anschauen. Wenn der Weg in Natura nicht mehr existiert kann man highway=path mit  disused:highway=path oder abandoned:highway=path ersetzen.  In allen anderen Karten (kompass, basemap, amap) ist der Weg ja noch drinnen.
Cirobob (2023-01-20 08:48:21+00:00): Per quanto possa sembrare strano (anche io ne ero convinto) quel tratto di strada dal Torrente Chiaravagna a Piazza Aprosio è già Via Sestri, così come è denominata Via Sestri anche la breve traversa lato mare che risale da Via Hermada. Si può verificare sia dalla toponomastica comunale, sia in loco attraverso la targa posta sul condominio oppure dall'andamento dei civici, in continuità con la Via Sestri pedonale. Ripristino lo stato precedente
nevw (2023-01-16 23:57:58+00:00): Hi, is the name misspelt?  There is no ‘r’ at the end of normal spelling of reserve.
dimi77 (2023-01-17 00:30:06+00:00): Yes, that was a typo, it should be "Langman Reserve".
nevw (2023-01-17 02:04:49+00:00): Thanks for fixing
dadavid (2023-01-16 23:04:11+00:00): reverted in coordination with DWG. See also community.openstreetmap.org/t/community-hilfe-bei-dwg-problem-benotigt-community-help-needed-with-dwg-issue
aTarom (2023-01-17 06:14:28+00:00): Hola Albert Salisi,
Benvingut i gràcies per editar,
la peça d'art del node
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10560477680/history
es tracta d'una instal·lació interior?
corregeixo el
"Inauguració" per "start_date"
i
la geometria de la plaça de l'Enxub
T'invito que si tens Telegram t'uneixes al canal
@osmcat
o bé al fòrum
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/lang-ca/69
qualsevol dubte als canals esmentats es pot resoldre millor que per aquí
Salutacions cordials
mrpulley (2025-12-13 09:53:07+00:00): 812989630 - maxspeed correct (not checked west of Moseley Road)
812989631 - not checked
mrpulley (2025-12-13 11:15:23+00:00): Moseley Road correct. Golsby Smith not checked.
NorthCrab (2023-01-17 06:14:21+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

bridge:support=kolejowy nie jest poprawną wartością. Proszę przeczytaj dokumentację tagu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge:support Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab (2023-01-17 05:00:33+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Proszę nie przyłączaj obiektów symbolicznych (linia drogi) do obrysów/obiektów rzeczywistych. Takie coś utrudnia przyszłą edycję mapy i nie pełni żadnej funkcjonalności. Pozdrawiam!
dadavid (2023-01-16 23:46:02+00:00): tagging still not quite right, healthcare =dentist is left over. Working on it.
bxl-forever (2023-01-17 14:17:52+00:00): Hello,

I should have told you earlier but would you please be so kind as to add the "source" for your changes within the changeset itsel, and not on every object.

For instance, if there is a "source" tag for a building, we wouldn’t be able to determine what the source was used for.  The shape of roof?  The outline of the building?  Its number?

It will probably save you time because I suppose you add them manually every time.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-31 16:35:08+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3863997 ?
mrpulley (2026-02-28 08:16:42+00:00): I've left these maxspeeds alone. At survey Nov 2025 was part of construction site for Coffs Harbour Bypass, maxspeeds will need reviewing after bypass opens.
Sammyhawkrad (2023-01-17 07:45:20+00:00): Hello bibsandcrib, welcome to OpenStreetMap! I see you have added a node but it contains no information about what it represents. Single nodes like these need tags that describe which kind of place (city/town, shop, school, etc) it represents.

You can share what you want to add and I help you with that.
Supaplex (2023-01-17 01:28:26+00:00): 你好

能否解釋為何要大量刪除建築物，這邊應該沒重劃或是改建情形
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131357185
Supaplex (2023-01-17 01:28:14+00:00): 你好

能否解釋為何要大量刪除建築物，這邊應該沒重劃或是改建情形
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131357192
Supaplex (2023-01-17 01:27:17+00:00): 你好

能否解釋為何要大量刪除建築物，這邊應該沒重劃或是改建情形
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131357368
RedAuburn (2024-10-05 18:45:54+00:00): no, no stations should have the line in their name. doing so is tagging for the renderer.
OOOOOandy (2024-10-05 22:24:11+00:00): no complaints here
Ewen Hill (2023-01-26 10:05:56+00:00): Hi Bob, thanks for the updates around the Talbot on top of the Yarra BVLD. I intend to delete a number of trails that you have marked as abandoned as there really appears to be one key route and a walking path around the hill top reservoir. Are you ok with this?
Ewen Hill (2023-01-26 10:16:41+00:00): Sorry, these are 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440744952
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440744951
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440744955
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440744956
and 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440744954

Most of these you marked as abandoned with another. Most had work done to prevent access from what I could see and the tracks pretty old.
BobBobuck (2023-01-26 12:38:08+00:00): I saw somewhere it was best to mark them as abandoned for historical purposes (or some such). But I ain’t the boss around here, so do as you feel is best!
Ewen Hill (2023-01-26 21:19:15+00:00): Thanks Bob. These look like unauthorised tracks that have been removed a long time ago other than the short spur and are still available via the osm map and Strava. Going to cull them but agree with your approach as well. I was amazed at the area and the view from the top.
emersonveenstra (2023-01-21 14:29:27+00:00): Hi,

You created an empty way here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1132603430, would you mind going back and tagging it? Thanks!
zeeland5 (2023-01-21 21:44:27+00:00): Should be all set now. Thanks for bringing that to my attention. I try not to overlook the small stuff, but that one got right by me.
This is also the first time (that I can remember) I had received a message regarding one of my edits. I didn't even know that was possible.
emersonveenstra (2023-01-22 02:32:45+00:00): No problem, thanks for fixing it!
Ryan081211 (2023-01-17 01:00:12+00:00): correção: adicionada TODA a mata nativa do arroio Candiota, ignorem o resto da frase
VA00 (2023-06-17 14:56:56+00:00): Tu obecnie jest sklep zoologiczny.
Grove11 (2023-01-17 01:25:05+00:00): oops
Noen (2023-01-19 12:40:21+00:00): Dette er ikke boliggater, men oppkjørsler, eller «driveways» på engelsk. Noen av dem er for korte til å at jeg ville regnet dem med som en oppkjørsel.
Prøv å søke opp «driveway» i iD.
Kim Bjerkevoll (2023-01-19 22:28:34+00:00): Takk for kommentar på feil bruk av highway tag. Ny oppdatering er gjennomført. Kommenter gjerne hvis det fortsatt er mangelfullt
flohoff (2023-01-22 21:24:53+00:00): 
Moim
du hast hier ein

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24895014

through|slight_left

in dem turn:lanes eingetragen.

Da die Spuren von links nach Rechts sortiert sind heisst das das rechts von der Spur die durch geht eine Spur ist die links abbiegt.

Kann es sein das du merge_to_left gemeint hast?


Flo
aighes (2023-01-23 23:21:54+00:00): Hallo Flo, stimmt. Danke fürs erinnern. Habe ich behoben.
SamuelTheCamel (2023-01-17 02:03:43+00:00): (Work in progress)
roaringfork (2023-02-07 23:22:43+00:00): Thanks for the close attention to detail here, valhikes! Perhaps instead of removing these shortcuts you might use the informal=true or access=no tags instead of deleting them. The US Trail Access Project has some useful guidelines here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Trail_Access_Project#Suggested_Tagging
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131358809
valhikes (2023-02-08 17:10:55+00:00): These were switchback cuts of the sort that result in no tread at the upper section and either a pile of dirt or no trail at the bottom. Sometimes the fact that people will ruin million dollar trail so that they can cut 10 feet off their journey while out for exercise really bugs me. Others were squiggly little lines diverging from the main trail by a few feet and for not very far. Most would take these as part of the already marked but overused trail. There were plenty small diversions like them not marked. One was along the main trail and after moving the trail, I'm not transferring over the little nonsense.

Everything that constitutes a unique route is still there.
tekim (2024-07-24 22:40:43+00:00): As you probably know, in OSM we map "ground truth."  If there is a trail on the ground, it can be mapped.  If it is illegal to use the trail (and it is signed as such - it is generally not illegal to go off trail in the national forest), the access tags should be used to indicate this. Perhaps having these trails on the map will highlight the problem you are concerned about and result in some action being taken.
mrpulley (2025-12-13 11:19:40+00:00): 218961283 - technically maxspeed 100, but not achievable on this rough track
239151477 - maxspeed correct
muchichka_s (2023-01-17 14:54:30+00:00): Що за тротуар Гаррі Поттера, що йде через стіну
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1132574960

Не треба склеювати будівлі, огорожі, доріжки
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:23:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:53:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:36:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:50:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:08:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:42:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:39:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:39:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:27:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:49:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Dary Raihanah IRM-ED (2023-01-20 07:06:25+00:00): Hi, GrabTH_Praiya. Thank you for your mapping contribution.
I found a road name gap issue on this road segment (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/28519641). The name of that road segment, 'ถนนทางหลวงหมายเลข 306', is different from the roads it is connected to, 'ถนนติวานนท์'. I want to fix it but I don't have local knowledge and only see it from satellite imagery so I want to discuss it with you. Do you know about the different road names in this highway primary segment? or is there any other information that you can explain?

I really appreciate any information you provide. Thank you.
Glassman (2023-01-19 00:10:28+00:00): #TIP: just connect the path between North Columbia Ridge Way and the driveway. Once connected routers will use the path for walkers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131360185
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:44:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Glassman (2023-01-19 00:11:48+00:00): #TIP: A view point is usually just a point. Position the point where the best view point is located. Can you fix this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131360234
Glassman (2023-01-19 00:13:15+00:00): #TIP: a footway is like a sidewalk. Use highway=path for what we'd call a trail in the US. OSM was created in England so we use British English for tags which can be confusing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131360308
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:50:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
VictorIE (2025-05-13 05:14:10+00:00): Hi,

You had a fixme here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7087258579/history

This appears to be a diamond crossover. railway=railway_crossing
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:30:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:32:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:29:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:57:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
mavl (2023-04-25 09:06:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:13:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:50:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:45:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:45:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert