piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Fjellrev (2024-11-28 20:16:18+00:00): At a first glimpse I would say: Yes.
But thinking further and checking official sources the answer must be no.
The building has just one adress (GVB-Nummer) 42c, so dividing it would leave one part without adress or two parts with the same adress - which both would be wrong.
The only "good" way in my eyes (as I see it for the moment) is to set an amenity place of worship as a point in the eastern part of the building, the western part is where the appartment is.
If this sounds good for you as well I might do it during the next days - I live nearby, so it is kind of "my" area.
Leylines2012 (2024-11-28 20:30:00+00:00): Sure, do it that way. And sorry for my changes in 'your' area. I'm working on a map with churches and chapels in Switzerland as extracts from OSM and the easiest way to classify the buildings ist the building= property, so i systematically changed the property on all buildings with Kapelle in the name.
Fjellrev (2024-11-28 20:59:23+00:00): I started a discussion here https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kirchengebaude-mit-wohnteil-wie-mappen/122273
Maybe there are some better ideas.
thongtacconghanoi (2024-11-27 08:41:22+00:00): https://thongtaccong.net.vn/
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/12AvZCr61NpPUCoDi_uYPvXAI7E7-lB7s
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1AEqfic7YIB23rG-OjVefFPRlg5lQQoqoQ2Txwhld8QI/edit?usp=drivesdk
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1tIOHyhaqzGu-h_--jWnzwMaoyAUabc3j
https://sites.google.com/view/thongtacconghlhn/page
https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1w_xdgmu8NV6yMySgkQ9QLyEnShFlwCU
https://thongtacconghn3.blogspot.com/2024/11/thong-tac-cong.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_AxPd1B-fM
https://x.com/thongtaccongnet/status/1861684616169693618
https://creators.spotify.com/pod/show/thongtaccong/episodes/Kinh-Nghim-Chn-Dch-V-Thng-Tc-Cng-Chuyn-Nghip-e2rig12/a-abldfh2
https://www.scoop.it/topic/thong-tac-cong-by-hut-b-ph-t-hoang-long/p/4162602254/2024/11/27/thong-tac-cong-tai-ha-noi-gia-re-uy-tin-tron-goi-50k
eggie (2024-11-27 09:23:32+00:00): Dag Fonsrae   Zit Baker van Maanen hier nog wel?
Twee bakkers naast elkaar?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-11-27 09:25:49+00:00): En heet die bakker name=Keilekker Brabantsche Worstenbroodjes ?
eggie (2024-11-27 09:27:42+00:00): Is de naam van de bakker wellicht Bakkerij Fort Isabella ?
Gr eggie
Fonsrae (2024-11-27 11:15:49+00:00): Hi eggie, ja die zit er nog, zie https://www.bakkervanmaanen.nl/locatie/vught-het-fort/ En het is een soort mini winkelcentrum, zitten verschillende zaken in 'het fort' zie https://hetfortvught.nl/
Zie ook
eggie (2024-11-27 11:25:24+00:00): Ahh... oke....

Mapse verder

eggie
rempshaener (2024-11-27 17:19:41+00:00): Hallo,
du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Anpassungen gebeten.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag.

Am Node steht noch amenity=school in Verbindung mit dem Namen „Kindergarten“
Du solltest das gegen amenity=kindergarten ersetzen und den Namen löschen, es sei denn, du kennst den Namen der Einrichtung.

Bei Fragen bitte einfach melden.

Viele Grüße
MZJanssen (2024-12-12 09:47:44+00:00): Danke sehr. Da war ich gedanklich vernagelt gewesen.
eggie (2024-11-27 09:29:30+00:00): Dag Fonsrae  Beter geen adresnodes gaan aanpassen. Dan komen sommie adressen 2x voor en andere zijn verdwenen uit de database van OSM.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=159649242
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-11-27 09:30:54+00:00): Nr 149 is twee panden verder
eggie (2024-11-27 09:33:14+00:00): Het oude adres heb ik hersteld en de winkel verplaatst naar 149.

Svp geen spaties in postcodes aanbrengen.

MVG
eggie
Fonsrae (2024-11-27 11:17:09+00:00): Ok, bedankt! Officiele adres is nr 149 vokgens hun eigen website, maar de winkel beslaat verschillende panden.
eggie (2024-11-27 11:26:36+00:00): Oke...  Dan kun je gerust schuiven met die adresnode die ik heb samengevoegd naar evt een middenpositie.

MVG
eggie
Gregory Peony (2024-11-30 19:01:21+00:00): Well done you correctly identified a building visible in the imagery. In future please press q to square footprints after tagging them. Check Changeset: 159784507 to see my modifications.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159649454
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:16:10+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165095056
mavl (2025-02-05 14:02:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162167075 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: wrong values for name:en - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161608012].
BCNorwich (2024-11-28 07:14:52+00:00): Hi, You've duplicated a lot of these fence lines between the houses. Fence on top of a fence.

Regards Bernards
Andrex88 (2024-11-28 08:09:48+00:00): A residential garden is a polygon, and it can have the property of "barrier: fence".
BCNorwich (2024-11-28 09:06:42+00:00): You are quite correct about the garden polygon which is an enclosed area feature. But adding the tag barrier=fence to the area feature, then joining another area similarly tagged feature to it makes for two fences on the join which is incorrect. In cases like this, the fence ought to be added as a separate feature thus avoiding duplication.

There are actually more problems, one is that there are many gaps in the barrier lines that provide highway access into the garden areas, The barrier doesn't enclose the entire property. Another is that these are not all fences, it can be seen that some barriers are walls or hedges. Also I very much doubt if the barriers extend through the middle of the semi-detached houses. 

You've also mapped the gardens as extending over the buildings.

Regards Bernard.
Andrex88 (2024-11-28 09:56:32+00:00): To be honest, when I started doing this I was following the approach used by blackadder (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/blackadder) in Sutton Coldfield, which had been praised by other users. The effective output is to see a land parcel, similar to that which is displayed on the highest detail of OS MasterMap, by utilising local knowledge and OSM Cadastral information. You are right in that the building sits 'on' the garden, but the garden itself is utilised more as a 'delineating feature' for the association of the land to the property. Clearly, there are going to be no pansies underneath the properties.

I hear what you are saying, but you are also adding another level of complexity and detail, and lest us not forget, we cannot know what the composition of every boundary is anyway, so its never going to be a perfect exercise.
jeslop (2024-11-27 10:29:57+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159652601
chris66 (2025-10-03 16:35:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1338253639
ist auf aktuellen Luftfotos (IDOP) verschwunden, eventuell wurde das Gebäude rückgebaut?
geomaniX (2025-10-06 16:40:21+00:00): Oh, Tatsache. Das ist ja kurios.
Es muss dann ja wohl zurückgebaut worden sein. 
Alkis weißt auch keine Hausnummer für das Grundstück aus. 
Ich setze es dann Mal auf razed.
literan (2024-11-27 16:43:56+00:00): не надо спамить своим сайтом на все здание
balint36 (2024-11-27 21:44:03+00:00): Mivel a módosítás számos olyan helytelen változtatást tartalmazott, ami az amúgy wiki szerinti helyes jelöléseket távolította el, azért a csomagot visszavontam.
balint36 (2024-11-27 21:44:01+00:00): Mivel a módosítás számos olyan helytelen változtatást tartalmazott, ami az amúgy wiki szerinti helyes jelöléseket távolította el, azért a csomagot visszavontam.
balint36 (2024-11-27 21:52:45+00:00): Itt helytelenül lett törölve egy service=siding címke.
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-28 10:10:27+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159660375
balint36 (2024-11-27 21:45:29+00:00): Mi indokolja a service=siding paramétert?
balint36 (2024-11-27 21:46:39+00:00): Mivel a módosítás számos olyan helytelen változtatást tartalmazott, ami az amúgy wiki szerinti helyes jelöléseket módosította helytelenre, ezért a csomagot visszavontam.
Sanniu (2026-01-04 15:53:49+00:00): Hi, do you understand why https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/699217077 has "access: no".
From aeral it looks completely regular roundabout...
BMM994 (2026-01-05 14:11:44+00:00): It does seem to have normal access.
I'll update the feature
Sanniu (2026-01-05 14:25:46+00:00): thx!
Filip009 (2025-10-28 09:39:27+00:00): Zdravím, nedávajte prosím do name "výstavba". Tagovanie ako building=construction je postačujúce.
gymko (2025-10-28 09:43:23+00:00): Zdravím, akurát včera som zistil že penzión je otvorený, tak už som aj tag pozmenil. Za upozornenie ďakujem, len mapy.com tento penzión ukazovali po pridaní že penzión je otvorený, na tag:construction to nemalo tým pádom vplyv, preto som napísal vo výstavbe.
Filip009 (2025-10-28 16:24:57+00:00): Nemapujeme pre renderer.

Potom by som dal construction:tourism=guest_house a po dokončení by som to zmenil. Všimol som si to "vo výstavbe" aj na ďalších veciach, ale netvrdím, že sú to všetko vaše zmeny. (Nepozeral som predtým autora, lebo som si myslel, že sa jedná o jediný objekt)

Alebo cesta, ktorú by som ešte uznal ako vhodnú, aj keď sa mi moc nepozdáva by bolo opening_hours=off "Vo výstavbe". Ale keďže to ešte nie je funkčný objekt, toto je tiež riešenie na hrane.
gymko (2025-10-29 11:24:55+00:00): Ďakujem
infeeeee (2024-11-27 23:59:16+00:00): Szia!

Ez nem Apple Store: https://osm.org/node/11235415595 Csak Apple hardvereket szerelő független szerviz. És honlapjuk alapján már nem is ez a nevük. https://www.ionic.hu
https://premiumservice.hu/kapcsolat

Ez megint az iD-nak valami beépített hibajavítója csinálja? Nem követlek téged direkt, csak az OsmCha megjelöli gyakran a szerkesztéseidet, hogy "Outdated Tags" https://osmcha.org/changesets/159653565/ 

De szerintem ez most a layer=-1 miatt volt, amit én sem értek miért van rajta ezen, talán a location=underground miatt. https://osm.org/way/133322822 Ezt inkább szét kéne szedni két elemre, amenity=parking és building=office egy vonalon kicsit ellentmond egymásnak, gondolom azt akarta jelölni az előző szerkesztő, hogy  mélygarázs van az irodaház alatt.
grozsa11 (2024-12-09 11:45:42+00:00): Szia! Nagyon köszi az észrevételeket! A mélygarázsos dolgot csakuyan egyszerűen ottfelejtettem, azt én is szét akartam választani. Köszi, hogy jelezted, úgy hagytam volna :- (( 

Az apple bolt viszont azt mutatja nekem, hogy igen, mégkevésbé kellene "megbízzak" az ID-beli hibajavítóban. Nem is tudom, hogy az abban lévő ötleteket ki szerkeszti/frissíti... de vagy még szkeptikusabban kellene figyeljem... vagy rá kellene gyúrjak arra, hogy azt hogyan lehet okosítani... mert ezt még nem tudom. 

Ez az https://osmcha.org/  ez most új nekem... kicsit megpróbálom megérteni, hogy mire is jó... de van még mit tanuljak, annyi biztos :- (( 

Köszi a jelzéseket!
Javítottam ezt a kettőt legalább :- )
Gza
balint36 (2024-11-29 20:12:34+00:00): A service=siding címke itt is indokolatlanul lett alkalmazva.
user_3022894 (2024-11-28 21:27:31+00:00): Hallo LeoW,

ich habe hier nur eine kleine Frage, und zwar, ist es Konsens, dass die elektronischen Anzeiger der Deutschen Bahn mit tourism=information + information=board getaggt werden?

Meines Wissens nach ist diese Kombination eher für analoge Tafeln gedacht

LG
Lukas
LeoW_Mentz (2024-12-05 09:42:22+00:00): Hallo Lukas,

ich habe mal ein bisschen nachgeforscht und es gibt keinen wirklichen Konsens bisher. Ich habe zusätzlich zu deiner Kombination passenger_information_display=yes für die digitale Komponente vergeben. Ich würde vllt zusätzlich noch board_type=public_transport vergeben.

LG Leo
user_3022894 (2025-01-22 21:07:39+00:00): Hi,

Ja, das sehe ich auch so, dass es bisher (leider) keinen wirklichen Konsens gibt. Ich habe an einigen Stellen public_transport=departures_board genutzt. Aber ist grundsätzlich ok, kann man natürlich so oder so machen.
czubi (2024-12-01 11:02:33+00:00): An der Straße steht es jetzt mit Abkürzung "Prof." und an der Schule ausgeschrieben "Professor". Was ist denn richtig?
CADdog63 (2024-12-01 14:51:22+00:00): Du hast recht, das geht so nicht. 
Schulen und Kita schreiben es aus, der Busfahrplan kürzt es ab. Ich habe es rückgängig gemacht. Das muss jemand mit Ortskenntnis machen
czubi (2024-12-02 08:50:38+00:00): Ja, finde ich gut. Die Adressen sollten nicht anders heißen als die Straßennamen. Merke gerade, die Aussage ist an sich schon sinnfrei ;-)

Heist die Regelschule jetzt anders?
Website hat sich scheinbar auch geändert?
https://www.schule-amschlossneideck.de/
czubi (2024-12-02 16:04:34+00:00): https://www.thueringer-allgemeine.de/regionen/arnstadt/article227588297/Bechsteiner-aendern-ihren-Namen.html
Rodrigo Rega (2024-11-28 21:03:23+00:00): Boas, engadín "official_name=Castro de Toldaos" porque así sae en Patrimonio da Xunta. Tamén cambién source por source:name.

Un saúdo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159654149
Monchinho (2024-11-28 22:33:28+00:00): Perfecto. O próximo caso que vexa que o nome oficial da Xunta sexa diferente do recollido a aprobado por Galicia Nomeada tereino en conta para poñelo así como fixeches. Saúde.
upc92 (2024-11-27 11:26:20+00:00): Do not edit me.
YomanNH (2024-12-09 06:31:41+00:00): Usunąłem fikcję.
YomanNH (2024-12-09 06:31:42+00:00): Usunąłem fikcję.
YomanNH (2024-12-09 06:31:44+00:00): Usunąłem fikcję.
YomanNH (2024-12-09 06:31:45+00:00): Usunąłem fikcję.
rskedgell (2024-11-27 12:52:44+00:00): This "busway" has no physical separation from the A2 Chatham Hill and was already tagged correctly before @demisee added it (they have a tendency to map, very badly, for the renderer). If you wish to improve TomTom's routing, delete the pretend busway.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111202846
Ky_AT (2024-11-28 13:09:33+00:00): Hi @rskedgell,
Thank you for your valuable feedback. I completely agree with your input. I didn't delete the highway initially because @demisee might have created it for a specific purpose. Since the bus-related details are already correctly present in the route relation, I believe deleting it is the better option. I've made the fixes as per your suggestion. Thank you for guiding me again!
YomanNH (2024-12-09 06:31:47+00:00): Usunąłem fikcję.
eggie (2024-11-27 14:10:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM..
Only a name= .... doesn't wrk in Osm

Perhaps amenty=events_venue
 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Devents_venue

Greetz..
eggie
eggie (2024-11-27 14:43:44+00:00): added  events_venue
Gr eggie
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2024-11-30 17:38:26+00:00): شكرا على مساهماتك في الخريطة، لكن لماذا حذفت الفيصلية؟
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2024-11-30 17:40:25+00:00): تمت الاستعادة لمعلومات هذا المكان
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-20 17:28:21+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186073633
YomanNH (2024-12-09 06:31:48+00:00): Usunąłem fikcję.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-29 00:54:41+00:00): This changeset incorrectly dragged a highway and disconnected it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159656528
Im Fokus (2024-11-27 14:14:02+00:00): Danke für Deinen Sperrungseintrag
rempshaener (2024-11-27 17:16:13+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Anpassungen gebeten.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag, das sieht gut aus.

Folgende Anmerkungen hätte ich dennoch:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1338277630
Das wäre mit waterway=drain ein Abwasserkanal, der in der Regel mit Beton ausgekleidet ist. Das ist hierzulande eher selten. Meintest du vielleicht einen klassischen Wassergraben? Das wäre dann waterway=ditch. Falls der Graben nicht dauerhaft Wasser führt, wäre ein intermittent=yes sinnvoll. An Straßenunterführungen müsstest du die Linie auftrennen und an entsprechenden Abschnitt ein tunnel=culvert setzen.

Gebäude: ich habe gesehen, dass einige Gebäude nicht (ganz) rechteckig sind. Die Arbeit nimmt dir der Editor ab: in iD markieren und „Q“ drücken – fertig.

PV-Anlagen: Bei Hausanlagen wäre bei „generator:output:electricity“ ein „small_installation“ angebracht. Und setze den Node am besten auf die Mitte der Panels, nicht auf die Hausecke.

Bei Fragen bitte einfach melden.

Viele Grüße
eserte (2024-11-28 20:09:34+00:00): Die Radspuren in der Beusselstraße wurden zu früh eingetragen. Richtung Süden südlich der Turmstraße nicht nutzbar, weil komplett zugeparkt, Richtung Norden zu großen Teilen noch nicht realisiert. (Heute gerprüft)
eserte (2024-11-28 20:11:05+00:00): Und außerdem: im nördlichen Abschnitt sieht es so aus, als ob die Richtungen vertauscht wurden: Richtung Norden ist (und bleibt wohl) die Busspur, Richtung Süden gibt es eine Pollerradspur.
Jrachi (2024-11-28 09:46:46+00:00): Ciao.
Perché metti a tappeto il tag roundtrip=no?, lo trovo assolutamente inutile.
Qui invece, stranamente hai deciso che una rete (malfatta e fuori regole REI) ingarbugliata è yes
Ivo
kräckel (2024-11-28 14:06:53+00:00): Ciao,
Qualunque cosa ti piaccia, è un mix, sentiti libero di cambiarlo.
Grazie per il suggerimento.
Addio Krackel
YomanNH (2024-12-09 06:31:49+00:00): Usunąłem fikcję.
maro21 (2024-11-28 22:07:07+00:00): Parking przy Aldi jest jeden - powinien być jeden wspólny obszar, a to co zmapowałeś jako parkingi to miejsca parkingowe.
scai (2024-11-28 07:09:18+00:00): Please don't re-add the shop tag. This is not a shop, right?
fabfab38 (2024-11-28 13:39:35+00:00): yes, I've tried, but with OsmAnd, it does anything
scai (2024-11-28 13:48:12+00:00): The inbuilt editor in OsmAnd is pretty bad. Better don't use it. Maybe take a look at EveryDoor.
IreuN (2024-11-28 15:51:38+00:00): W sumie to połączone punkty też (sic!)
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-27 14:17:59+00:00): Updated opening hours and street name to match what most data consumers are expecting.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159659360
somehundred (2024-12-01 21:33:06+00:00): Sveiki!

Šajā reģionā iesaku izmantot Esri World Imagery, jo tas ir jaunāks nekā Orthophoto (2016–2018). Precīzu gadu gan nevaru pateikt.

Dažās vietās Esri mežs redzams izcirsts, bet Ortofoto nē. Piemēram, šeit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/56.82165/24.13409

Arī citās vietās ārpus Rīgas (kur jaunākais šobrīd ir Bing) iesaku salīdzināt Ortofoto ar Esri, lai neiezīmē novecojušus datus.
Mister_R2 (2024-12-02 16:17:30+00:00): Labi
StC (2024-12-04 22:12:28+00:00): Bonjour,

il me semble que ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là
Valérie Tardif (2024-11-29 00:18:19+00:00): Hi, I appreciate the improvements you're making to streets and sidewalks, but it seems that you've reverted the changes I recently made to reflect the rerouting of the 36 bus route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159639704).
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-11-29 00:27:22+00:00): I'm sorry! I was not aware of the revert. Maybe there was a conflict? usually when there are conflicts I verify that nothing is deleted, but it may occur from time to time since the conflicts resolution system is sometime erroneous in the iD editor... I can try to fix the 36 Monk route as soon as possible. Sorry for that!
Tallguy (2024-11-29 09:43:35+00:00): Hi @ptriol and welcome. 

Quite a crowded area to start on - looks good to me & thank you for your contribution.

I often walk into the centre of Swanley, but its easy to overlook changes that are needed.

Feel free to reach out if you want to chat.

Regards, and hope to see more from you in the future.

Tallguy
silversurfer83 (2024-11-27 20:11:31+00:00): Gude Volker,

Der Name des Parks sollte am Besten nur einmal entweder an *einem* Punkt ODER an einer Fläche, die den gesamten Gewerbepark umfasst, erfasst werden. Falls du dich dort auskennst, kannst du das Areal ja erfassen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dcommercial
oder
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dindustrial

bei Fragen immer raus damit
cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159660302
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-28 10:10:35+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159653405
Stephen Males (2025-11-29 10:43:36+00:00): Hi Heroly, regarding this changeset, I drove along Bernera Road today, but I could only see a shared path on the western side of the road. Have you seen some evidence of a shared path on the eastern side too?
If not, perhaps its just a footpath?
Regards,
Stephen
Aenet (2024-11-30 06:31:08+00:00): Why shouldn't the contact page of the website be listed separately from the general website? After all, there is a separate tag for contact:website and website.
emersonveenstra (2024-11-30 20:27:22+00:00): contact: is a tag namespace prefix, it's not a qualifier for the website tag. Basically they are identical tags, you can read about that here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:website

What you want to do would be best done using the website: prefix (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website:*), so probably website:contact, but there's not a lot of support for that.
Aenet (2024-11-30 05:41:23+00:00): I added the two separate Facebooks on here because the Facebook group contains information on meeting times that is not present on either their website (oops, I meant to add that before) or their Facebook profile, namely, the Alley Cat rides (e.g. https://www.facebook.com/events/418680934369640). 

I will move the mention of Alley Cat rides from opening_hours to service_times, as that is more appropriate for an event with a single beginning time. 

Is there a way I should indicate via tags the purposes for each of the separate Facebook pages? facebook:group, contact:facebook:group, or source:service_times perhaps? I choose to specifically use the profile for contact:facebook as that is where the operator communicates directly and where they accept messages, and I choose the group for facebook= because it seemed the only appropriate available key.
Aenet (2024-11-30 05:42:41+00:00): Also I'll probably copy the tags from the node into the building because the Bike Co-op occupies the entire space so there is really only one entity there.
emersonveenstra (2024-11-30 20:39:03+00:00): For the facebook question, it's the same as the website tag of the other changeset, the contact:facebook tag is a duplicate of the facebook tag, they aren't meant to be both specified in the same object, and the tag value is the full URL or pagename, not a group name (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:facebook)

putting the group in source:service_times makes the most sense to me, but there's not a standard way in OSM to define two different facebook URLs for the same object
upc92 (2024-11-27 19:49:00+00:00): Добар назив за објекат * Деведесетка *
Gonéo (2024-11-27 16:54:46+00:00): Bonjour, et bienvenue dans la communauté OpenStreetMap.

Concernant la demande de revue de cette première contribution: il n'est pas utile d'ajouter l'adresse d'un bassin privé, d'autant plus qu'il fera doublon avec le point d'adresse déjà présent à l'entrée de la propriété. Il vaut mieux garder un unique point d'adresse.
rskedgell (2024-11-28 16:19:11+00:00): Thanks for adding it and checking LLDC.

I've updated it using more recent INSPIRE data than the OSM overlay, which is a little out of date.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159709953
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 02:47:17+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165051748
eggie (2024-11-27 14:41:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

The name of the harbour is already tagged on the waterway.
The area is a water=harbour I think..
Greetz,
eggie
BP15 (2024-11-27 14:46:27+00:00): It is identified as water=canal currently.
I only added the name of the that was present on the osm basemap (name=Seinehaven)