piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Patchanka (2026-03-04 08:59:03+00:00): bonjour
merci pour les ajouts de commerce dans OSM <3
Pour info, j'ai vu que vous avez publié une BAL certifiée pour les adresses, je vais les ajouter très bientôt dans OSM.

En ce qui concerne les commerces (et en général), pouvez-vous prendre en compte les bonne pratiques suivantes :
- positionner le point du commerce à l'endroit où il est, donc plutôt à l'intérieur du bâtiment plutôt qu'à l'extérieur
- éviter les intitulés tout en majuscules (ex ici ce serait plutôt Agence Tag)

Je vois que vous êtes en train de contribuer en ce moment même, alors je vous laisse corriger tout ça !

N'hésitez pas à me dire si vous avez besoin d'aide
MappingMore (2026-03-04 08:58:35+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179338656
ajmat (2026-03-04 08:27:38+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179337399
Kovoschiz (2026-03-02 17:28:22+00:00): Sewage pumping stations should use `=pumping_station` , not `=wastewater_plant`
bartgron (2026-03-02 15:01:43+00:00): Poprawiłem tą drogę na drogę wewnętrzną ponieważ stanowi dojazd jedynie do dwóch posesji
mateuszjurczuk96@gmail (2026-03-02 15:16:35+00:00): Nie jest to prawdą. Ta droga biegnie w kierunku północnym aż do kolejnej miejscowości a swoj początek zaczyna aż w miejscowości Bąblin. Nie jest to w żaden sposób droga wewnętrzna gdyż jest to droga publiczna w całości, łączy miejscowości i obowiązują na niej zasady ruchu drogowego a nie jak w przypadku drog wewnętrznych. Jest to droga gminna publiczna gruntowa.
bartgron (2026-03-02 15:28:20+00:00): Którędy ta droga biegnie aż do kolejnej miejscowości? Chyba że łączy się z drogą Bąbliniec - Podlesie...
mateuszjurczuk96@gmail (2026-03-02 15:31:39+00:00): Tak
Kurosawa06 (2026-03-03 17:46:01+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai supprimé ce point de location.
N'hésitez-pas à ajouter des notes si vous souhaitez améliorer la carte.
Branko Kokanovic (2026-04-15 22:44:04+00:00): Again names on roads in Serbia? I would report you (you = ADT, not MountHuila) to DWG, but I know it is futile because you can just do whatever you want. Why don't you just go to your friendly corporate map of overture, go in bed with tomtom and just leave us on OSM?

I don't expect answer to my comments, nor I care about another sterile corporate answer how sorry you are and how you will change your procedures so it doesn't happen again.
MountHuila (2026-04-16 16:29:16+00:00): Hello Branko Kokanovic,

The name “Ибарски пут” was originally added by the user Badojo in 2020 on connecting ways (way 303639291 and way 839882710). I transferred the name to the spit portions of the road entering the roundabout as it is a logical extension of the same road which shares the same ref. In a previous changeset discussion (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165018916), you indicated that transferring name tags across short connecting segments was acceptable, which is why I made this edit. If you’d prefer that we no longer make these kinds of transfers, please let us know.
ratrun (2026-03-03 17:54:28+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Your new trunk highways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1484624386#map=16/36.28036/1.99157 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1484624389 look unrealistic. Are you sure the classification as highway=trunk is correct? Shouldn't these be highway=track only?

Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1484624392#map=19/36.268454/1.984361 is definitely wrong as it is not connected  to the trunk road in the south.

Please check and improve your edit!
dknelson9876 (2026-03-07 18:39:54+00:00): Hi Akgeo,

If you look a little closer at this junction, you should see that the segment you added is unnecessary, because the way closer to Sheep Lane is not oneway, since there's no physical barrier between the left turn lane and the other direction of traffic
finn-hound (2026-07-28 12:32:11+00:00): Hi, is Holly Hill finished construction?
Lostmonkey (2026-03-24 11:11:48+00:00): Bemærk at en ladestation (amenity=charging_station) består af én eller flere landestandere (man_made=charge_point). Er der kun én ladestander, kan denne tilføjes som en ladestation, men er der flere landestandere (fra samme operatør) i samme afgrænsede område, skal de altså ikke hver især tilføjes som en ladestation. Det er ladestandere.
aTarom (2026-03-06 16:22:06+00:00): Hola, el nombre
"Parque del Balconing"
se trata de algo de conocimiento local?
No tiene nombre oficial el parque?
eggie (2026-03-02 15:38:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-03-02 14:30:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/978377549 v1 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/9053008412 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179257401
eggie (2026-03-02 15:40:33+00:00): Hoi,

Dierenspeciaalzaak is geen valide tag.
shop=pet?

MVG
eggie
Patchanka (2026-03-04 08:42:14+00:00): bonjour

dans cette modif vous avez supprimé le bâtiment de La Poste.
Est-ce juste La Poste qui n'est plus là, ou bien vous confirmez que le bâtiment a bien été démoli ?

merci d'avance
MappingMore (2026-03-03 16:08:53+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179309820
Monolo23 (2026-03-03 18:07:49+00:00): Hi, according to the OSM naming guidelines, localized names may be stored using name:<language>=* when they represent an official or commonly used name in that language.
For example, “Aeropuerto de Sofía” is the established Spanish exonym for Sofia Airport and should be tagged as name:es=*, not treated as a descriptive name. This also happens in Churches and many other objects.
I saw that you removed many names of different objects in different languages, please restore all data loss.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Translation
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Localization
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
rhhs (2026-03-03 18:34:14+00:00): I removed the Spanish name of the airport because the official name is Васил Левски (Vasil Levski). If the official Spanish name is different than Vasil Levski, it can be added.
I removed the English and Spanish names of Obelya metro station because they are not different from the one in int_name (which should contain the name in Latin script transliterated from Cyrillic according to the Bulgarian transliteration law, so I also removed Obelia from it). I removed "Monumento" from the Spanish name of the memorial to Petko and Pencho Slaveyko because the information that it is a monument is already contained in the historic=memorial tag. If you have comments on my other edits, let me know and we'll discuss them :)
Monolo23 (2026-03-03 18:54:29+00:00): It's okay that the official name of the aiport is Васил Левски, but in Spanish as many other language, we don't say Vasil Levski, we say "Aeropuerto de Sofía" as the name:es is the common name of a place not the official_name=* that is a different tag, that, shouldn't be removed.
The official_name of the airport in spanish is "Aeropuerto Internacional Vasil Levski de Sofía" which is not the same as the common name (name:es)
Removing the name:es tag because it looks similar to the transliteration is an error, as "Sofia" (Latin/English) and "Sofía" (Spanish) are orthographically different.
Deleting these tags breaks map internationalization. Even if a name seems "descriptive", if it is the standard way a language refers to a feature ("Monumento a..."), it belongs in the name:XX tag. The historic=memorial tag defines the type of object, but it doesn't replace the linguistic name used by speakers.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_internationalization
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:official_name
SomeoneElse (2026-03-12 23:48:54+00:00): Regarding the English name, the airport's own website https://sofia-airport.eu/en/about-us/history/ suggests that the English name is "Sofia Airport".  Maybe the website was mostly written before the rename, but you'd think that it would get a mention at https://sofia-airport.eu/en/about-us/history/ .
The removal of these names in https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/178952040 seems silly because airports really _do_ have verifiable names in many languages.
If you can't reach an agreement between yourselves, perhaps try the forum?
Best Regards
Andy (from the DWG)
rhhs (2026-03-14 18:20:20+00:00): The rename is recent, so not all pages of the airport's website are updated. It is mentioned on the home page: "Parking made easy at Vasil Levski Sofia Airport: ..." "Sofia Airport" is of course used a lot (the previous name of Vrazhdebna was never popular), including in the airport's logo, so I added brand=Sofia Airport). I can imagine that the renaming hasn't become popular in Spanish yet. The other issue here is whether to include generic parts of names. The Bulgarian community generally avoids it (for instance "street" is never included in the name of streets). The Spanish community may have a different attitude. The question is if the geographic or the language community's practices takes precedence.
Dawid2849 (2026-03-02 16:02:59+00:00): Z takimi edycjami zapraszamy na https://opengeofiction.net/
simacekjakub (2026-03-04 16:57:12+00:00): Hezký večer, na jednom pilíři Dvoreckého mostu jste zrušil tagy layer=1 a location=underwater. Ty dva mostní pilíře zakotvené na dně řeky jsem vytvářel já, jestli ty tagy byly správně rozporovat nechci, jistý si tím už sám nejsem, ale stejné tagy jsou i na druhém pilíři, který je ukotvený ve Vltavě, a tam ty tagy zůstaly. Omylem?
vojtechzaboril (2026-03-04 17:14:59+00:00): Ahoj,
tagy jsem smazal, neboť byly podle mě chybně. layer=1 by znamenalo, že je pilíř na stejné úrovni jako mostovka (ale ve skutečnosti je pod ní). underwater by zase znamenalo, že je objekt pod vodou (kompletně), což se využívá třeba u podvodních kabelů nebo potrubí.
Samozřejmě nemám patent na pravdu a je možné, že existují argumenty, proč tam tyto tagy mít.
vojtechzaboril (2026-03-04 17:15:46+00:00): Jinak druhého pilíře jsem si nevšiml. Pokud se shodneme, že tam tagy být nemají, tak dává smysl je odstranit i z druhého.
simacekjakub (2026-03-04 17:32:22+00:00): Ahoj, jasně, rozumím a vůbec nerozporuju. Odstraním je i z druhého.
vojtechzaboril (2026-03-04 17:34:24+00:00): Supr, díky moc.
BCNorwich (2026-03-02 17:37:46+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've repositioned the shop as per the address.

Regards Bernard.
eggie (2026-03-02 16:00:22+00:00): Dag timonk. Je bedoeling is natuurlijk goed, maar nu ontbreekt er een adres en een ander adres zal nu twee keer voorkomen.
Beter zo'n node leeghalen of met een truc kopieren en de info dan bijvoegen op de nieuwe adresnode. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-02 16:03:44+00:00): Adres hersteld en info samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode.
timonk (2026-03-03 01:37:48+00:00): Aha, bedankt eggie! Ik had niet door dat POIs niet los van adressen stonden. Dus hoe zou ik dan de info weghalen bij de oude adresnode en met een truc bijvoegen bij de nieuwe adresnode? Of is dat nu al gebeurd?
eggie (2026-03-03 05:37:12+00:00): Hoi.. Hier heb ik dat al gedaan.
Ik heb de pois gewoon naar elkaar geschoven en damengevoegd. In editor iD plakt het automatisch.
Groet,
eggie
A67-A67 (2026-03-03 17:27:43+00:00): Lumen stond al op de nieuwe locatie als construction:amenity=cinema. De bioscoop is namelijk nog niet geopend. 

 In deze wijziging wordt ook allerlei informatie over rolstoeltoegankelijkheid van het oude gebouw meegenomen naar de nieuwe locatie. Dat klopt natuurlijk niet. Ik zal die foutieve info verwijderen.
MappingMore (2026-03-04 08:09:08+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179336615
Sylabowy Kot (2026-03-02 19:49:23+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tych danych liczbowych? Na pewno ich nie wyciagnąłeś z ortofotomapy.
stasiu512 (2026-03-02 20:22:25+00:00): Cześć, wartości można dostrzec na zdjęciach z poziomu ulicy Bing Streetside. Pozdrawiam.
AndyB_66 (2026-03-02 18:26:04+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
NeisBot (2026-03-02 15:27:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 22 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1484645807 v1 | 19 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1484645814 v1 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/3008659789 v3
https://osm.org/node/3008659780 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179260128
bartgron (2026-03-02 16:28:01+00:00): Poprawiłem błędy, polecam na przyszłość łączyć odpowiednie elementy ze sobą.
Pozdrawiam
Yunan973 (2026-03-03 17:28:43+00:00): Bonjour,
pouvez vous corriger votre erreur, cf. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=3.90026&lat=43.56966&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
dmjab13 (2026-03-02 17:19:23+00:00): hi there... it looks like this changeset affected some nodes that are really far apart from each other. please try to refrain from this
Bartek444 (2026-03-02 17:23:10+00:00): nie za duży ten budynek?
30m x 37m
większy niż działka na której jest
eggie (2026-03-02 16:10:01+00:00): Hoi Denk dat het aardig klopt.
Wellicht kun je het azc nog toevoegen op een adresnode met amenity=social_facility
social_facility:for=refugee
socia_faciliy=shelter
name=......................?

Mapse,
eggie
eggie (2026-03-02 16:10:50+00:00): typo name = .....
Wildsharky (2026-03-04 04:50:32+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179331793
yrtimiD (2026-03-03 13:13:04+00:00): Hi, in this case I think is better to put address info on the building itself instead of new node
OmerMadlan (2026-03-08 14:17:30+00:00): Ok. Thank you.
Wildsharky (2026-03-04 04:33:00+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179331491
ajmat (2026-03-03 17:28:42+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179313789
pkoby (2026-03-04 17:19:53+00:00): If you know what's off limits, would you be able to add access=private or access=no tags to those ways?
b3rnardino (2026-04-30 22:39:51+00:00): Seconding the above comment. These paths have now propagated to other services, appearing as though they're available to the public and are used for routing.
khag7 (2026-04-30 22:42:09+00:00): I didn't label them as public. The paths exist.
pkoby (2026-04-30 22:51:38+00:00): They are by default considered public unless you tag them otherwise.
chris66 (2026-07-24 01:14:16+00:00): Ich sehe den KAUFLAND hier nicht, wurde er vergessen einzutragen?

VG.
chris66 (2026-07-24 08:16:41+00:00): Hab den fehlenden Supermarkt nun ergänzt.
NeisBot (2026-03-02 16:27:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 16 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/761519453 v5 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/825789929 v2 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/334334048 v4 | 5 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179263148
ajmat (2026-03-03 17:39:47+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179314539
Don Biffero (2026-03-02 16:57:51+00:00): Imboccato da Via Carducci, non via Vestina, ho scritto male
NeisBot (2026-03-02 16:51:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1484676891 v1 | 6 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179264374
NeisReview (2026-03-10 17:33:14+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179265046
AndyB_66 (2026-03-02 18:23:02+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
LordGarySugar (2026-03-30 04:09:45+00:00): It's not correct to add a place=locality node with name "Iranian attack site". Removed.
Nrmnnbdy (2026-03-03 15:24:29+00:00): Why delete?
gscholz (2026-03-03 06:32:08+00:00): Hi George Sears,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting and displaced ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=16.26526&lat=41.30822&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=179265061

Can you please fix this?

Kind regards
Guido
George Sears (2026-03-03 08:34:14+00:00): Sure, thanks for making me notice
DwarfNebula_ (2026-03-10 00:19:23+00:00): Hey Geim,

Weet je zeker dat dit klopt? Volgens mij heeft Berend dit juist aangepast naar hoe het er tegenwoordig uitziet: https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.08679,5.168759,19/?datastrip=20260208_SVNEO-01&sensorname=SuperView-NEO

Groetjes, Jasper
Geim (2026-03-10 07:16:43+00:00): Oepsie, goed mogelijk, gelukkig valt het mee. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=179265324
Kun jij de changeset terugdraaien? Anders doe ik het vanavond.
NeisBot (2026-03-02 17:18:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13468874228 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tony Romas restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-10 17:33:12+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179651162
(No visible changes after review)
rarad74 (2026-03-02 19:23:21+00:00): Salut. Se folosesc obligatoriu diacritice.
ika-chan! (2026-03-03 09:38:48+00:00): Hello, The EO53 has been found not to go that far. We have carefully documented where the national roads go, with sources, at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Greece/National_Roads.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179292181
5m4u9 (2026-03-08 21:45:23+00:00): Hola, como en la otra edición. A ene/2026 en imágenes Mapbox no hay ninguna construcción solo son proyecciones a futuro.
NeisBot (2026-03-02 17:27:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13416686239 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Apartment building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-10 17:33:12+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179651163
(No visible changes after review)
Udarian (2026-03-03 18:37:54+00:00): Question, what is your source for this changeset, I ask because I spent several hours yesterday trying to check this, I didn't find anything that showed that FDOT had stopped designating this as SR 847, I dd se some things that show the Miami Dade county is not in charge of construction and maintanace on this segment of road, but it seems it is still designated as SR 847 by FDOT.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
Udarian (2026-03-22 00:17:16+00:00): I have added the ref back as you have not responded with evidence that this is no longer a Florida state road and I my self (along with others I asked for help with this) could not find any such evidence.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
MappingMore (2026-03-03 07:35:50+00:00): Revert of 179232305
Kovoschiz (2026-03-12 17:15:54+00:00): Please don't add descriptor labels as "Proposed" to `name=` , which are for proper names only. The different styling and lack of an icon already distinguish them.
Dundee930 (2026-03-13 07:56:49+00:00): As the project "Hong Kong Clearwater Bay Hospital" seems put on hold a decade already. And it seems the developers give up the project. Map Readers may Misunderstand and think the hospital will be built very soon if no "proposed" wording. Is that better delete this sector?
Kovoschiz (2026-03-13 08:07:50+00:00): As I said, it is already rendered with different color, and it has no `=hospital` icon. Furthermore please check the definition of `landuse=browfield`
NeisBot (2026-03-02 17:42:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/337074232 v6

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mexican restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-11 05:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179673345
(No visible changes after review)
MarcoR (2026-03-02 20:55:12+00:00): Benvenuto su OSM!

Per mappare un semaforo che, normalmente spento, diventa rosso in caso di emergenza potresti usare highway=traffic_signals + traffic_signals=emergency (vedi la wiki per maggiori dettagli: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:traffic_signals%3Demergency).

PS. i semafori andrebbero mappati su un nodo della strada su cui hanno effetto.

Buon mapping,
Marco
Jordi MF (2026-03-09 20:20:45+00:00): En castellano, se suele usar la denomianción "Baiona", con "i": https://www.abc.es/viajar/destinos/espana/baiona-real-villa-gremio-mareantes-20260203114114-nt.html, https://www.elmundo.es/viajes/espana/2025/09/10/687751a6e9cf4ae30f8b458d.html, https://elpais.com/espana/2025-12-18/muere-una-turista-al-ser-arrastrada-por-una-ola-en-la-costa-de-baiona-mientras-hacia-fotos-desde-las-rocas.html.