piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
RobJN (2023-08-27 17:11:10+00:00): Just to be clear, your edits were not vandilism. The vandilism came from the user (corrector321) who deleted my previous mapping of this garden. That editor is working for the owner of this garden and hence I checked with the Data Working Group that I was ok to restore my edits. Obviously you had no way to know all this so I was not overly surprised to see your edits. This then left me with a conundrum - leave it as you had mapped or roll all the way back to my edits. I chose to go with the latter. I hope that was ok.
stevewm (2023-08-28 05:58:07+00:00): Thanks for the clarification. I have no problems with what you have done. I am not sure what the position is if an owner doesn’t want their area to be mapped, particularly if the information used is partly the result of a visit made under certain restricted conditions. For example it is common to say people may not take photos but I have never come across anything related to mapping but I suppose it is such a minority activity. Has the user been blocked to prevent a repeat? Is the previous discussion about these changes publicly available?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-22 16:20:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11136640228
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11136640227
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/153220942

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Awoobis (2023-08-22 17:01:48+00:00): fix'd
titaniumtown (2023-08-22 16:18:48+00:00): forgot to add a title to this, it uses bcpao.us data and adds more housenumbers
user_5359 (2023-08-22 16:25:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a deeper look to the OSM wiki (https://wiki.osm.org)
gurglypipe (2023-08-24 07:54:27+00:00): Hiya. Is landuse=grass the most specific tagging for these areas? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass describes it as to be used for “smaller areas of mown and managed grass for example in the middle of a roundabout”.

These look like meadows to me. Are they not?
user_16720371 (2023-08-24 08:03:48+00:00): You need to get out more. 😂😂😂
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-13 12:40:27+00:00): Hello!

You used
tracktype=grade5y
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/414703392/history

Have you maybe meant
tracktype=grade5
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Galbinus (2024-03-13 13:27:48+00:00): That was a typo. Das war ein Schreibfehler. Ich habe ihn jetzt korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis. Thanks.
amadvance (2023-08-23 14:13:51+00:00): Ciao marco,

Volevo segnalarti che alcuni tuoi recenti aggiornamenti del suolo di ieri hanno danneggiato alcune relazioni multipoligono delle foreste della Valle Imagna. 

In pratica non venivano più visualizzate le aree verdi delle foreste.

Ho già sistemato alcune cose io, e altri stanno guardando per alcuni aspetti più complessi. In particolare la parte di Rota d'Imagna ha ancora dei problemi.

Comunque, mi raccomando, fai sempre molta attenzione a modificare queste relazioni, in quanto è facile creare problemi.

Ciao,
Andrea
marcodusatti (2023-08-23 15:16:52+00:00): Ciao Andrea grazie per la segnalazione! Mi scuso per gli inconvenienti che ho creato nell'intento di migliorare la mappa. C'è un modo per ottenere delle istruzioni per questo tipo di modifiche onde evitare di creare in futuro ulteriori danni? Grazie, Marco
amadvance (2023-08-23 17:29:51+00:00): Ciao Marco,

Non preoccuparti. Capita di sbagliare. Ci siamo passati tutti.

Per i multipolygon, in effetti è un po' complicato. Puoi partire dalla documentazione ufficiale: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Nel tuo caso, avevi cancellato un piccolo segmento della relazione, e questo rendeva la relazione invalida, e quindi non più visualizzata. 

Anche io da poco mi sto interessando alla cosa, è vedo che quasi tutti i mappatori che lavorano a questo livello usano l'editor JOSM e non quello da browser. Credo che sia una precondizione per fare modifiche che richiedano di cancellare parti o modificare relazioni esistenti. Per esempio, in questo caso l'editor JOSM mostrava chiaramente la relazione con un pezzo mancante.

Invece se si tratta solo di spostare punti, o creare nuove relazioni, credo sia sufficiente l'editor ID nel browser.

Adesso dovrebbe essere tutto a posto. Persone più esperte mi dicono che eventuali problemi di visualizzazione ad alcuni livelli di zoom sono solo temporanei.

Ciao,
Andrea
user_18241296 (2023-08-22 16:49:23+00:00): Дополнил название: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140238012
-io- (2024-07-11 05:20:55+00:00): Название дома: "заколочено".
Серьезно?
maximaximax (2024-07-12 03:57:01+00:00): зато наглядно!
DP24PH (2023-08-23 03:42:25+00:00): ERRATUM: The POI information is a part of Sampaloc 1 (from Robinsons/SM Dasmariñas southwards), NOT San Agustin.


DP24
DaDapperMapper (2023-08-23 22:09:28+00:00): Hi DP24PH!

The POI edit made is located south of San Agustin, but I see you would like a more closer feature as the changeset location. I will keep this in mind for changeset comments in the future. Thanks!
PcMouse1 (2023-08-22 17:30:39+00:00): S'il te plait si tu peux faire un commentaire plus descriptif sur les modifications ca aidra beaucoup. 
Un commentaire constructif sur l'ensemble des modifications aide les verificateurs puisque les suppressions massives sont signalees.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140238755
cricri (2023-08-23 07:32:05+00:00): Salut, je pense que tu devrais arrêter la supervision "fliquage" avec un soft qui considère que la simplification d'un way entrainant la suppression d'une centaine de points comme "massive"...
je dis ça, j'dis rien :)
et sinon j'ai mieux à faire qu'écrire un roman pour une opération banale et bégnine ...
Anton Khorev (2023-09-13 22:25:15+00:00): Это было изменением зданий, а не "addrN normalization". Почему вы здесь объединили несколько зданий в одно? Потому что в ргис одно?
anastasia_ (2023-09-14 05:30:49+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Здания имеют одну адресацию, не смотря на то, что это два здания, поэтому были объединены в мультиполигон с одним адресом.
Проверяю по ПКК, панорамам, POI в зданиях.
Anton Khorev (2023-09-14 13:01:43+00:00): > Здания имеют одну адресацию, не смотря на то, что это два здания

Если вы согласны, что это не одно здание, не следует объединять его в одно. Полигон с адресом, если он нужен, можно сделать и отдельно от зданий.

В любом случае, исходя из количества правок за 22 августа, у вас не было времени на принятие решения, сколько здесь зданий. Так что вы могли бы оставить этот вопрос для других участников, тое сть не менять здания. Вы ведь собирались менять addr:street2 на addr2:street, а не здания перерисовывать?
adreamy (2023-08-25 12:49:27+00:00): 작은 것까지 매핑해 주셔서 고맙습니다.
하지만 OSM은 보물찾기나 오리엔티어링이 아닙니다.
확실치 않은 것은 다른 분께 맡겨 주시고 비교적 확실한 지물만 추가해 주시고 최대한 사실에 맞도록 매핑을 부탁드리겠습니다.
막상 이 정보를 보고 찾아 갔는데 못 찾는다면 기분이 그다지 좋지 않을 것 같습니다.
jmarchon (2023-08-23 04:55:55+00:00): Nice! I'd love to see you do this north of Eugene as well. Any chance?
b-jazz (2023-08-24 01:18:04+00:00): Depends on what is meant by "North". If it is in Lane County, then yes, I'll get around to it at some point. I usually remember as our monthly dinner meetup approaches.
jmarchon (2023-08-24 14:52:48+00:00): Sounds good!
MarcoR (2023-08-23 06:07:45+00:00): Ciao!
Non so nulla di preciso, ma a quanto ho capito quella relazione rappresenta una vecchia proposta della Ciclovia tirrenica (ex BI-16 adesso BI-19) che partiva da Verona e arrivava a Roma. Purtroppo su OpenStreetMap non è stata più aggiornata. In questo momento la relazione è spezzata in due parti ed è parziale. Sai se il tratto Verona–Casalmaggiore appartiene a qualche ciclovia della zona?
Tra l'altro esiste già una ciclovia Tirrenica BI-19 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1782624) che copre altri due monconi nella zona di Grosseto e un pezzettino di Viareggio. Bisognerebbe unire le due relazioni.
Premo19 (2023-08-23 07:21:54+00:00): Ciao, grazie della risposta!
Si chiama BI19 perché l'avevo corretta appunto ieri perché ho visto su BICITALIA che la BI16 ora è quella della Sardegna.
Il tratto Verona-Casalmaggiore, almeno tra Mantova e Sabbioneta, in questo momento dovrebbe avere un'altra relazione MN23 (quindi provinciale di Mantova immagino) che ha anche sotto una PCR17 Tirrenica (quindi regionale lombarda). Queste ultime due dovrebbero essere in essere.
Rimane che la BI19 Tirrenica attuale fa Liguria, Toscana e Lazio, perciò questo tratto non riguarda quella.
Cercando però mi sono imbattuto in https://www.mantovasabbioneta-unesco.it/it/page/39725 che è recente e ne parla come Ciclovia Tirrenica Bicitalia n.16 (TiBre dolce).
Trovo strano che la sigla sia la stessa della Sardegna. Forse ho sbagliata a correggere. Una situazione poco chiara.
MarcoR (2023-08-24 14:21:18+00:00): Sì, la situazione è poco chiara ma credo che chi decide i nomi e i tratti siano FIAB e bicitalia.org quindi la parte Verona–Casalmaggiore non dovrebbe più far parte di alcun tratto nazionale.

Apro un post su https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/it/60 e vedo cosa mi dicono lì.

Grazie e buon mapping,
Marco.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-08 19:22:51+00:00): Note that mapping utterly gone railways is out of scope for OSM, please do not map railway tracks where no traces whatsoever are present
Glassman (2023-08-22 21:35:22+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140239376
Glassman (2023-08-22 21:35:29+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140239553
martien-176 (2023-08-22 18:03:29+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. 

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. 

Watch these 2 short video for more info: 
-Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
-Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ 

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140239579
martien-176 (2023-08-22 18:04:07+00:00): Also, please be more careful with tracing the outlines of the buildings. Zoom in as close as possible to see the outline of the buildings, hit each corner of the building carefully. Look for shadows, open ground, changes in roof color and vegetation to differentiate buildings. Your editors' Background settings provides the opportunity to change the Brightness, Contrast etc of the imagery. This can help to see buildings etc. more clearly.

Check out this article with basic information on how to map buildings: https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140239579
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-23 01:59:20+00:00): Reverted by DWG for apparent vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140252811
Glassman (2023-08-22 21:35:37+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140240440
goedegazelle (2023-08-23 06:25:41+00:00): Een woonpand met meerdere adressen wordt meestal als appartement gemapt.
lipuma (2023-08-23 12:16:13+00:00): Goed gespot, dank je wel voor het melden! Heb het aangepast, groetjes.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-23 01:59:21+00:00): Reverted by DWG for apparent vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140252811
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-22 18:10:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Osiedle Łukaszewko":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11136801180
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11136801181
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11136801183
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11136801185
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11136801186
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11136801191

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
AmyCupcake (2023-08-29 12:52:33+00:00): El lloc de web es un enllaç a google maps? o es el teu font per canviar el lloc? No crec es el primer i si es el segon, es un font sense llicència.
jserret (2023-08-31 16:27:30+00:00): ho volia com a enllaç web pero si no es pot fer doncs el treiem
driesverlinden (2023-08-22 19:47:09+00:00): Klopt het dat Szamotulystraat niet is aangepast? Een paaltje blokkeert er de toegang vanuit de Deinsesteenweg.
RubOSM (2023-08-22 20:53:31+00:00): Niet opgemerkt. Dat paaltje zal inderdaad tijdelijk weggenomen moeten worden ...
RubOSM (2023-08-22 20:58:33+00:00): Heb het nu verwijderd (weet niet of dit de routing o.b.v. OSM beïnvloedt).
voltairovicz (2023-08-23 09:03:01+00:00): Dobra robota :)
Anton Khorev (2023-09-13 22:01:30+00:00): Удаление зданий, например
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/99698242
, я бы "нормализацией" называть не стал. Соответственно откатил весь пакет.
anastasia_ (2023-09-14 05:38:58+00:00): Здравствуйте. Да, вижу, не добавила общий контур/мультиполигон. Спасибо, что отметили.
Anton Khorev (2023-09-14 13:03:42+00:00): Для addr2 вам не обязательно делать мультиполигоны.
maraf24 (2023-08-28 17:57:54+00:00): To, że iD wypisuje jakieś ostrzeżenia nie oznacza wcale, że mają one sens lub są poprawne.
Np. w przypadku bankomatu z operatorem Euronet wcale nie musi on mieć brand=Euronet.
Lepiej nie tracić czasu na takie glupoty tylko mapować naprawdę użyteczne informacje z terenu.
Lesiakower (2023-08-28 19:31:49+00:00): Starałem się zatwierdzać tylko te najmniej wątpliwe poprawki (np. zamienienie przestarzałych tagów na nowsze, scalenie punktów i dodatki szczegółów do przejść dla pieszych). Rzeczywiście, tego nie uwzględniłem. Dzięki za informację! W sumie chyba lepiej wyjść na dwór i pomapować niż siedzieć na fotelu przed komputerem wpisując niekiedy niepewne dane...
maraf24 (2023-08-28 19:50:17+00:00): Dzięki za info.
Autorzy iD często są w gorącej wodzie kąpani. Część z tych przestarzałych tagów nie jest przestarzała, tylko jest to inny, wciąż prawidłowy system tagowania.
Ostatnio wiele tych kontrowersyjncyh "ostrzeżen" zostało poprawionych/usuniętych przez iD, ale wciąż jest kilka pułapek.  Przychodzi mi na myśl. np. proponowanie zmiany landuse=basin na natural=water (chyba że to już też poprawili :).
Pozdrawiam
Op'tRad (2025-07-27 12:38:25+00:00): Hallo Luc, Er zit een waterway dam op het kruispunt van een pad en de Flierderweg. Moet dat niet een verkeersdrempel zijn of zo? Groet, Werner
Luc Heres (2025-07-29 18:30:45+00:00): Goedenavond Werner, 

Ik begrijp niet goed wat je bedoelt. Waar zit die dam op de Flierderweg? 
Groeten, Luc
Op'tRad (2025-07-30 09:06:20+00:00): Ik zie hem niet meer. Iemand anders zal het al wel hebben verwijderd.
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 19:03:54+00:00): Please add more detailed changeset comments indicating what you are changing and why. The town name is not sufficiently descriptive to evaluate your intent.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140243749
spughetti (2023-08-23 14:58:56+00:00): Hi ybmeng, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

May I ask why you named the building "Waymo New Front Door"? It seems like an odd name for a business.
ybmeng (2023-08-23 18:29:21+00:00): Because I work there, and that's the building's name since 2021. 

You can see on google maps it's also called that/
spughetti (2023-08-23 19:01:12+00:00): Ah you're right, my bad! :)
IgorEliezer (2023-08-23 03:01:33+00:00): Olá,
Por favor, deixar o noexit=yes do fim de ruas sem-saída que estão perto de outra rua, ou os validadores (ex.: OSMInspector) dão alerta. Obrigado.
eggie (2023-08-22 20:05:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-08-22 20:06:10+00:00): Feedback : Lijkt me oke zo..
eggie (2023-08-23 12:20:07+00:00): Dag Dwerg

Zou de officiële naam echt Ruiterpad zijn.. Dat geldt ook voor Ruiterpad Heuvelweg.
Zoniet dan kunnen die straatnamen er weer af.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-08-22 20:09:16+00:00): Feedback  Het grote terrein is toch gewoon ook een parkeerterrein.. Toch geen charging_station
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140244786

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-08-22 20:35:17+00:00): De parkeerplaats heb ik gefatsoeneerd.. Alles lag over elkaar heen. 
Zie ook wiki hoe een parking te mappen
eggie (2023-08-22 20:14:18+00:00): Kjjk eens naar de wiki hoe een parkeerterrein te mappen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking

en de aparte parkeerplaatsen bv voor de gehandicapten
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space

Je kunt evt dan drie terreinen mappen als amenity=parking en niet als charging_station.
Daarin keun je de parking_save als vlakjes intekenen
Groet
eggie

MVG
eggie
Map_HeRo (2024-01-20 19:49:55+00:00): Hallo Miselajus, Du hast hier einen seit Jahren gemappten Teil des Radweges R13 komplett gelöscht und ganz neu angelegt - m.E. unnötig, das der Verlauf bereits sehr präzise erfasst war (way 1201177255). Damit ist die ganze Historie weg. Wozu soll das gut sein? Gruß Mikke
Miselajus (2024-01-21 22:08:43+00:00): Hallo Map_HeRo, teile mit doch bitte noch mit, um welchen Weg es sich handelt, damit ich das nachprüfen kann. 
Gruß Miselajus
Miselajus (2024-01-21 23:17:28+00:00): Sorry, ich hatte zunächst überlesen, dass du den Weg bereits angegeben hattest.

Zur eigentlichen Frage:

Dieser Weg gehörte ursprünglich zu dem südlich weiterführenden Weg, ich hatte ihn anscheinend von diesem abgetrennt. 
Wenn man einen Weg teilt, behält (wenn man in JOSM keine anderen Einstellungen vornimmt) der größere Teil des Weges den Namen und die Merkmale des ursprünglichen Weges. Der kleinere Teil erscheint als neuer Weg mit den Merkmalen des ursprünglichen Weges. 
Normalerweise mache ich solche Teilungen, wenn sich Wegeeigenschaften geändert haben oder ich sie in Teilen differenzierter sehe. In diesem speziellen Falle sind allerdings die Eigenschaften des alten und neuen Weges gleich geblieben. Da am Trennungspunkt der Wald beginnt halte ich es für wahrscheinlich, dass ich den südlichen Teil des Weges von "motor_vehicle=destination" in "motor_vehicle=forestry" ändern wollte, vielleicht beim Mappen unterbrochen wurde und dann nicht mehr daran gedacht hatte. Auch "smoothness=bad" trifft für den südlichen Teil des ursprünglichen Weges nach meiner Erinnerung nicht zu. Im kommenden Sommer habe wieder in der Gegend zu tun und werde mir das  noch mal ansehen.

Im Übrigen kannst du versichert sein, dass ich nicht zu den Mappern gehöre, die ein Objekt löschen und es dann unter ihrem Namen wieder auferstehen lassen. 

Danke für deine Aufmerksamkeit.

Gruß Miselajus
Map_HeRo (2024-01-22 21:12:57+00:00): Hi und danke für die ausführliche Antwort. Ich bin eher zufällig drauf gestoßen und war etwas überrascht, dass plötzlich die Historie fort war 
(was auch für Weg 120177256 gilt). Zum Glück ist es nur eine Forststraße, da wird außer mir vermutlich niemand bemerken, dass die Altdaten fehlen.

Den R13 fahre ich mehrmals jährlich mit dem Rad, kenne die Strecke also ganz gut. Der Zustand des "nördlichen Teils" ist definitiv "bad", auch der "südliche Teil" bis zum Pumpwerk von K+S. Von dort weiter südlich eher zwischen "intermediate" und "bad", da tendiere ich immer dazu, das schlechtere Tag zu wählen. Da die Qualität der Oberfläche von Jahr zu Jahr schwankt, muss man das ohnehin immer wieder mal überprüfen. Es ist also kein Schaden entstanden.

Gruß Mikke
Map_HeRo (2024-01-29 20:30:46+00:00): Nachtrag: Habe das schöne Wetter genutzt, dort ein Runde mit dem MTB zu drehen und u.a. das Tagging des R13 dort zu aktualisieren.  Wenn Du das nächste mal dort bist, kannst Du das ja noch mal gegenchecken. Gruß Mikke
WoodWoseWulf (2023-08-26 05:38:58+00:00): Hi MurkyMurlockPirate,

Welcome to OSM! The park feature you added here is already on the map as an area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461103841#map=17/36.15170/-115.30422

I'm going to go ahead and remove this addition.
DaveF (2023-08-23 13:15:34+00:00): Hi
Cloud you use this please.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:prow_ref
emersonveenstra (2023-08-25 02:39:07+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for the additions to the map!

Please don't use the names to describe things like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1201178292

Instead, search the wiki for appropriate tags, like https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drestaurant

Could you please go through and remove any descriptive names and replace them with the appropriate tags? Thanks!
osmviborg (2023-08-23 05:54:14+00:00): VisitViborg er nu en del af VisitAarhus.  Cykelruter der kun blev vedligeholdt af Viborg er nu slettet.
maro21 (2023-08-23 20:44:26+00:00): access=no oznacza zakaz ruchu, więc to nie to samo co napisałeś w komentarzu "Tylko uprawnieni tam wjadą" - w takim razie powinno być access=private, lub jeśli chodzi tylko o pojazdy vehicle=private.
maro21 (2023-08-23 20:46:32+00:00): Jakie są znaki i fizyczne bariery?
Tomkow1933 (2023-08-24 06:26:52+00:00): Nie pamiętam czy jest tam znak. Na pewno jest tam brama przesuwna na pilota.
Tomkow1933 (2023-08-24 06:27:42+00:00): Brama od północnego wjazdu, od południa szlaban.

Musiałem to objechać aby dojechać na ul. Makowa 21e
Hufkratzer (2023-08-23 20:33:10+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1201180976 looks like a riding arena (and not like a riding centre); riding arenas are usually tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, compare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding
In JOSM you can use the preset for sport=equestrian to tag them.
englu (2023-08-24 12:23:30+00:00): Zmiana przebiegu szlaku niebieskiego jest sprawdzona w terenie?
marphii (2023-08-24 14:18:16+00:00): Osobiście byłem odpowiedzialny za zmianę szlaku w terenie. W tej okolicy początkiem września będzie jeszcze jedna zmiana, naniesiemy ją odrazu po zmianie w terenie.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 07:02:43+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145278561
mbe57 (2023-12-12 12:01:24+00:00): This normalization ended up with a bank that has a population of nearly 7000?
watmildon (2023-12-12 19:27:41+00:00): Hello! I presume you're interested in this node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/153943762/history). If that's not the case let me know. 

The data error you mention predates my cleanup work but definitely points to something being wrong. My best guess is the error was introduced in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34636544) by merging perviously overlapping bank and place nodes. The bank information and place information appear to have been re-added independently leaving this as an extra (and erroneous?) node.

I have move the extra bank tags to the bank and adjusted the county relation to use the other place node as the "admin_centre". Does that seem right to you? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145050802
mbe57 (2023-12-13 00:43:10+00:00): Spot on, thank you, watmildon.
I stumbled into this bank item when rebuilding the dataset for settlements, in preparation for re-rendering them for the openandromaps.org world maps.
TXs for the quick response and resolution. 
Cheers
Michael
raccoss (2025-09-26 08:39:51+00:00): Non sono ancora terminati i lavori sulla SS19'