piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Streetjamin (2026-02-11 18:06:16+00:00): Ich habe in erster Linie die Webseite (hier: https://kanuverein-laubegast.de/impressum/) genutzt. Auf Google Maps finden sich dieselben Informationen aber auch (https://maps.app.goo.gl/1UmRc75R7bB3vV8NA).

An welcher Stelle hätte ich die Quelle angeben können?
Tatfahren (2026-02-11 20:49:49+00:00): Normalerweise beim hochladen des changesets, im "source" Feld. Wo das in Organic maps möglich ist, weiß ich jedoch nicht.


Warum ich nachfragen wollte:, bei OSM müssen wir darauf achten nicht aus Quellen zu kopieren, die die Daten nur scheinbar öffentlich verfügbar machen, und keine Freigabe für OSM erteilt haben. Dazu gehört etwa Google, aber auch viele andere scheinbar öffentliche Quellen.

Du hattest in wenigen Minuten mehrere POIs an verschiedenen Orten hinzugefügt, weshalb ich es für wahrscheinlich hielt das du nicht vor Ort warst um diese zu erfassen.

Das eintragen auf Basis einer Website ist meines wissens nach nicht eindeutig ausdiskutiert. 
Ich ziehe damit meine Frage zurück, da ich keine Lust habe über das Urheberrecht bestimmter Websites zu diskutieren, da ich mich dort unzureichend auskenne. Würdest du tatsächlich versehentlich von Google oder ähnlichem kopieren, hättest du es wahrscheinlich in der Antwort bereits geschrieben. 


Danke für deine schnelle Antwort, und entschuldigung für meine etwas unfreundlich formulierte Frage.
uvi (2026-02-13 11:09:58+00:00): Bitte immer darauf achten, dass die Informationen zur OSM-Lizenz passen. Das sehe ich bei beiden Quellen zumindest fraglich!
eggie (2026-02-11 09:06:17+00:00): Dag Molensteen. Ik zie een parallel trottoir (footway) met lanes=2 en een tag construction=residential langs de Rudi van Dantzigstraat en de Anna Pavlovastraat?
MVG
eggie
molensteen (2026-02-11 10:25:01+00:00): Dank u eggie, ik heb dat verbeterd.
Warin61 (2026-02-12 04:24:08+00:00): HI,
JOSM would have given you a warning about way 1476332380. That has something you should fix... 
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.56015&lat=-32.75023&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Baloo Uriza (2026-02-11 14:08:36+00:00): I think landuse=farmland is for crops, landuse=meadow for grazing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178383638
NEOK Ground Truth (2026-02-12 03:03:02+00:00): I wasn't sure what to put on this. The wiki made it seem like a hayfield should be landuse=meadow, but it makes more sense to me as farmland.
Glassman (2026-02-11 23:46:36+00:00): #TIP: we don't use descriptive names in OSM, the tags do all the work. I went ahead and removed the name tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178383795
pwbriggs (2026-02-19 05:39:46+00:00): Thanks for the edit https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/sd97. In addition to the note above from https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Glassman, I'd like to point out that Google Maps' licensing prohibits use in OpenStreetMap: please make sure you don't add any data derived from Google Maps or other proprietary sources. Thanks!
NeisBot (2026-02-11 00:46:32+00:00): 🌍 Bem-vindo ao OSM, <>.
Obrigado por contribuir!

Para tornar a colaboração mais fácil e ajudar os outros a entender as suas edições, é melhor adicionar uma breve descrição das alterações que fez. Comentários claros ajudam a comunidade a seguir o seu trabalho e fornecer feedback melhor. Você pode encontrar dicas para escrever bons comentários aqui[1].

✅ Aqui está um exemplo de comentário com base nas suas edições do mapa: "Adicionado nome da rua 'RUA TILAPIA' à estrada"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, <>{.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added street name "RUA TILAPIA" to road"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
Sanniu (2026-04-23 06:00:10+00:00): Hi, you missed to update the name:en 
Can you update it to a new name?
Sanniu (2026-02-19 05:58:41+00:00): HI, can you add also street name to addresses to make it searchable?
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:16:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178468006
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:16:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178468005
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:16:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178468004
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:16:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178468002
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:16:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178468000
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:16:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467997
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:16:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467995
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:16:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467993
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:16:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467991
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
mueschel (2026-02-19 13:13:47+00:00): Hi,
could you explain what "lobby hours" and "ibanker hours" are?
skquinn (2026-02-19 18:05:50+00:00): These were copied from the original. All I did was correct/clean up the syntax.
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:15:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467990
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:09:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467743
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:09:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467741
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:09:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467739
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
aharvey (2026-02-18 01:22:48+00:00): Didn't realise there was a track there, thanks.
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:09:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467737
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisBot (2026-02-11 01:57:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12420527350 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Architecture office"

#MapWithoutSpam
fortera_au (2026-02-11 22:20:59+00:00): Hi, your address on your website doesn't match this location. It also appears to be a residential location, is this an office where someone can come to at any time between 8am and 10pm Monday to Sunday?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178384855
Behalf Architects (2026-02-11 22:44:22+00:00): This is a new location. There is a dedicated home office where I work from and take meetings.
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:09:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467736
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:09:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467734
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:09:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467732
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:09:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467730
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:09:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467726
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:09:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467723
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
Speedo1 (2026-02-12 17:16:07+00:00): هذه المدينه داخل الأراضي الفلسطينيه
ما المشكله في تتغيراتي؟؟
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-12 17:19:49+00:00): You have added a lot of fictional data in your recent changesets, such as helipads and aerodromes ...
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-12 17:22:13+00:00): And of course, changing the place tag from city to neighbourhood is vandalism, apart from the name change ...
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:09:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467717
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:09:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467714
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:09:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467710
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:09:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467709
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
Speedo1 (2026-02-12 17:14:48+00:00): هذه المساهمه داخل حدود مصر المائيه
ما المشكله في وجود هذه ؟
لا يوجد تغيير في حدود 
لا يوجد أي تغيير غير طبيعي
هذه المساهمه حقيقيه لوجودها داخل حدود مصر الدوليه 
وهذا ليس تغيير للحدود
لأن داخل حدود مصر المائيه
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-12 17:17:34+00:00): Please stop adding fictional data to OSM.
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:08:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467707
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:08:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467704
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:08:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467701
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:08:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467699
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
gc27 (2026-02-11 04:21:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178387309 所沢駅西口
先行したマッピングと重複する分を整理しました
Vaporeon2801 (2026-02-28 10:26:13+00:00): 修正ありがとうございます。
Comino (2026-02-11 08:53:21+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes".

The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NOT accepted.
Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Cryptocurrencies_with_payment_tag and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:*#Cryptocurrencies

Please REMOVE the payment:cryptocurrencies=yes !

Thank you.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
FajrAl (2026-02-11 03:07:36+00:00): Perlu diketahui bahwa produk Google melarang asetnya dijadikan sebagai sumber pemetaan. Sehingga tidak boleh ditambahkan ke OpenStreetMap.
aharvey (2026-02-11 04:46:40+00:00): Thanks for the contribution!

It looks like you've accidentally dragged a bus stop https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/12644854029 it's too easy to accidentally drag nodes in the iD editor.. I've fixed that.
auspi (2026-02-11 05:24:31+00:00): Apologies, I didn't realise I did that. Thanks for fixing that, much appreciated. I'll keep this in mind in future.
KennyDap (2026-02-11 04:47:31+00:00): 1. Your changes to the map must be accompanied by comments.
2. You have not provided any justification for deleting this section.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178388049
5m4u9 (2026-02-12 01:36:32+00:00): Hi, the latest satellite image (Mapbox 2025) no longer shows this part of "the roundabout," nor can you see a painted area simulating a traffic island that would justify this road....
Alva_01 (2026-02-12 02:20:28+00:00): Hello again! Well, it's true that there's no physical traffic island (and not even a painted one), BUT there's a 2-or-3-lanes-wide space between the two northern lanes and the kerb up north, which people use to merge with the western 6 de Julio Ave. lanes in order to enter the roundabout driving southwards.

Since this traffic behavior came to existence as a result of it developing/evolving spontaneously over time, I would suggest not reverting the edit but instead adding the informal=yes tag. What do you think?
5m4u9 (2026-02-12 13:19:17+00:00): It's OK for me with this reason "... which people use to merge with the western 6 de Julio Ave. lanes in order to enter the roundabout driving southwards."

Until 2024, there was a physical traffic island, but the ABC office razed it. Thank you for your time and for answering my question.
rhhs (2026-02-11 09:14:44+00:00): One of the service roads you added goes right through a building under construction. Didn't you notice? It looks like the building shape is wrong so I will edit it.
HamiDesert (2026-02-12 17:54:45+00:00): Hello rhhs, 
Thank you for pointing that out. I should have re-aligned the building polygon after adding the road. I’ll ensure to be more careful regarding this going forward.
Happy mapping!
FajrAl (2026-03-18 03:56:46+00:00): Wow. Untuk pelinggih, bisa gunakan historic=wayside_shrine
Supaplex (2026-07-15 05:18:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13542415139

If it is not a public open, it shouldn't be mapped
rarad74 (2026-02-11 06:57:51+00:00): Salut. Te rog sa folosesti diacritice. Nu ar trebui sa astea altcineva sa corecteze dupa voi. Multumesc.
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-11 07:02:46+00:00): Hallo rarad74,

leider habe ich keine Ahnung, was du meinst. Könntest du das bitte genauer erklären?

Danke.
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-11 07:04:10+00:00): Ergänzung: Hier werden keine diakritischen Zeichen verwendet.
GinaroZ (2026-03-14 23:38:54+00:00): Hi, is the B9993 definitely open to traffic connecting to the A9?
Gorger (2026-03-17 04:03:29+00:00): Hi GinaroZ,

I checked with recent TomTom internal GPS traces and the data supports that the route is carrying traffic from B9993 to A9. Please let me know if it’s not the case if you are from the area, since I cannot verify with images.
Thank you for reaching out.
GinaroZ (2026-04-02 14:10:30+00:00): Another mapper has surveyed this area and found the road is not open, see: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:New%20section%20of%20B9993.jpg?uselang=en-GB

I am curious how TomTom's GPS traces indicated this road was open. How many traces were there and did drivers report it as being open? What other evidence do you use before editing OSM?
Gorger (2026-04-07 09:41:38+00:00): At the time of the edit (February 11, 2026), multiple datasets (speed and direction) were supporting this decision. I appreciate you sharing recent visual evidence from the location. 

Please feel free to inspect screenshots of the GPS datasets from the time of the edit and from the past week here: https://github.com/tomtom-international/open-data/discussions/194. It might be a temporary situation, or I might have misinterpreted the movement of construction vehicles at that time.

We generally perform edits in OSM based on feedback from customers or TomTom’s local map experts. If we can verify this with other supporting evidence such as imagery or GPS traces, we perform the edits. 

Thank you for your interest in our mapping workflows. Please feel free to reach out to our project managers via osm@tomtom.com if you want to discuss these processes further.
Vaidotas (2026-02-12 16:17:01+00:00): Ar vietoje gtfs_id neturėtų būti naudojama žyma gtfs:stop_id ? Wiki rašo, kad gtfs_id nebenaudotina - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:gtfs%20id?uselang=en
Jurkis (2026-02-12 16:29:38+00:00): Ačiū, pasidomėsiu, pataisysiu.
Szymson (2026-02-11 18:07:14+00:00): Kolego, cóżeś narobił z ulicą Polną?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12766621659
Szymson (2026-02-11 18:08:24+00:00): Poprawiono:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178418842
NeisBot (2026-02-11 07:28:23+00:00): Hi Eldarado, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 98% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 6 highway(s)
- 6 surface(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178391151
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-11 07:34:20+00:00): Looks good. Thank you.

Best regards, 
Pascal
KennyDap (2026-02-11 11:18:17+00:00): hi, but its spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178401661
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-13 02:11:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13542531960

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-13 02:11:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13542552202

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2026-02-11 07:28:22+00:00): Hi Eldarado, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 97% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 5 highway(s)
- 3 surface(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178392609
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-11 07:33:44+00:00): Looks good. Thank you.

Best regards, 
Pascal
gabro00 (2026-02-11 17:20:00+00:00): Szia! Ha csak házszámozol, vannak érdekes célszerszámok telefonra, pl:
- https://streetcomplete.app/
- https://every-door.app/
Mbalazs81 (2026-02-12 23:09:58+00:00): Hali, köszi a tippet, ez az every door jó szolgálatot fog tenni, jóval egyszerűbb lesz élőben beírni, nem utólag keresgélni a térképen.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-03-04 00:13:07+00:00): Reverted due to intentional SEO vandalism, changing the website URL of the admin boundary of the city of Miami Beach, Florida to that of their company.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179327527
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-13 03:22:44+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13542552031

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-13 03:22:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13542567923

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bxl-forever (2026-02-11 09:25:35+00:00): Hello,

I am afraid the edit you made on the Toronto subway is not correct.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5320046200/history/5

This node, which is attached to the tracks, is a "stop position" node.  It is a marker, which is set on the track to indicate where trains will stop along the track.  You inadvertently changed it into a station node.  By doing so, it means that we now have two stations here instead of one, because the station is already on the map: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26240972

Station and stop position nodes are two different concepts, this is why they are mapped separately.

I restored the stop position node to its original state.
silversurfer83 (2026-02-11 09:41:11+00:00): Hi Timm,

two more things:

- "smaller fixes" isn't a helpful comment. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for details.

- please make sure to upload pending changes before you continue to map somewhere else entirely. You can find more here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

happy mapping and safe travels

(and be careful with "AI" in context of OSM. Reach out at c.osm.org *before* you deploy any kind of software on our live database. I wrote this with your bio in mind)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178393457
ivanbranco (2026-04-07 09:27:28+00:00): Hi SK53,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13542597891

what's the meaning of circumference=.2? Does it mean 0.2?

what's the meaning of "height=2 7"? Does it mean 2.7? Or does it mean that one stem is 2 and another one 7, since is tagged as multistemmed=yes?

thanks and good mapping
eggie (2026-02-11 09:00:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback...De lift_gate heb ik nog toegevoegd.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Drewarner (2026-02-11 08:48:09+00:00): #mapbox_missing_roads
Hendrik Helsper (2026-02-11 22:14:55+00:00): Ach das ist ja interessant, ich wusste gar nicht, dass sich das auch mit einer Relation lösen lässt.
ManuelB701 (2026-02-12 08:31:44+00:00): Habe ich selber vor einem halben Jahr herausgefunden und vermutlich auch nur durch Zufall beim lesen von type=boundary entdeckt.
Hendrik Helsper (2026-02-11 22:44:51+00:00): Trägst du nur fehlende Hausnummern ein oder änderst du auch bestehende? Zweiteres wäre nämlich ein bisschen heikel, weil die ALKIS Daten oft auch falsch bzw. veraltet sind. Oft sind auch im ALKIS Hausnummern eingetragen, die vor Ort garnicht angebracht sind.
LG
wies1 (2026-02-12 10:23:08+00:00): Ich trage die fehlenden Adressen ein bestehende Adressen lasse ich drin, dies gilt erst recht, wenn sichtbar ist, dass die vorort eingetragen worden sind.
Was das Alkis angeht, steht da in JOSM drin, dass dieses tagesaktuell sei.