piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-03-14 21:05:35+00:00): Hello Angelina Salazar, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1367410773
https://osm.org/way/1367410774

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163627213
Glassman (2025-03-14 23:29:05+00:00): I have reverted all of your changes to Denali. Please consult with the community before making name changes to the peak. See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571/9 which also includes the Gulf of Mexico
NeisRevert (2025-03-15 15:58:27+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163627938
Stoneirene (2025-03-14 21:15:43+00:00): fff
NeisReview (2025-03-15 06:39:15+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
NeisRevert (2025-03-15 16:04:34+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163652618
jm428 (2025-03-17 15:36:32+00:00): This should also be deleted, because the Sylvan residential area is already on the map.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674175738
NeisBot (2025-03-14 21:21:15+00:00): Hello Angelina Salazar, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1367413565

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163627692
PhilippSL (2025-03-14 21:25:33+00:00): Ich habe gerade gesehen das mappen nach RP DOP40 nicht zulässig ist. Kann ich den Änderungssatz selbständig zurückziehen?
berndw (2025-03-15 17:36:52+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap

Du hast mit der Verwendbarkeit der Quelle recht.

Mit iD kann man, soweit ich weiss, keine Reverts durchführen, ich mache das mit JOSM

Erledigt mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163661043
Glassman (2025-03-14 23:20:06+00:00): Thanks for keep it named correctly
jm428 (2025-03-17 15:30:27+00:00): UHS is already on the map. You should delete the node that you added.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-15 02:34:27+00:00): Hi. In this case, as the church basically no longer exists, could you please remove the denomination & service time tags, leave your description, but also amend the other tags to abandoned:amenity & was:name. Thanks.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-16 00:01:47+00:00): Why did you add the random fake road?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-15 02:40:30+00:00): You've added the bridge tag to the road itself, which actually makes the entire road appear as a bridge, which it doesn't appear to be! You will need to remove that tag from the road, cut the road each side of the bridge, then only tag that portion as a bridge. Thanks
jleedev (2025-03-14 21:48:20+00:00): https://osm.wiki/good_changeset_comments
NeisBot (2025-03-14 21:48:00+00:00): Hello Angelina Salazar, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1367416487

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163628419
NeisReview (2025-03-15 06:52:01+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163628438
SafwatHalaby (2025-03-18 19:17:07+00:00): Hello. Were are you getting these translations from? They don't all make sense.
Jouanny (2025-03-18 19:28:22+00:00): I have a list a points I need to update with latin alphabet. If I find a name published in a website with an english version, I would use the translation provided, if not I have to use Google Translate. I am happy to get your suggestions if you have a better translation.
SafwatHalaby (2025-03-18 19:31:56+00:00): Thank you for your intentions, but using Google Translate is a terrible idea and is unacceptable. Google Translate does not understand local context and you have probably introduced numerous errors in English. Please do not use Google Translate for English names in Israel, and preferably not worldwide either!
Jouanny (2025-03-18 19:37:24+00:00): I understand your point. Any suggestions how to handle those those traductions correctly? The Hebrew alphabet (as other non romanized alphabet such Greek) does not function properly in an international context.
Jouanny (2025-03-18 19:38:44+00:00): And please, feel free to correct the name in english. I'll stop doing it on my side.
SafwatHalaby (2025-03-18 19:59:53+00:00): Thank you for understanding. I'll try fixing the ones in my region.
SafwatHalaby (2025-03-18 20:14:05+00:00): As for your question, as far as I know there's currently no automated way to properly handle translations. Especially for more distant languages or languages with less training data available.

You simply need a human who understands the context.
SafwatHalaby (2025-03-18 20:16:09+00:00): In my opinion, it's fine if you found a reliable online translation (a Wikipedia article for example), but I wouldn't suggest using Google Translate as a fallback
SafwatHalaby (2025-03-18 20:25:41+00:00): Another important point to consider is translation vs transliteration. For example, If we call this node "eye of the...", it would be a manufactured name and not a real one. It would be misleading since it's not a used name.

In this case, Transliteration may be better, i.e. "Ein Hik".

There are cases where transliteration is not suitable either. This is discussed here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#When_to_avoid_transliteration
Jouanny (2025-03-18 20:41:14+00:00): I appreciate the feedback, thank you for your help with this one and for sharing the information.
SafwatHalaby (2025-03-18 20:44:03+00:00): You're more than welcome, and thank you for your efforts! 

For the record, I have opened a discussion in the IL forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bad-automated-translations/127581/2
yrtimiD (2025-03-28 00:55:20+00:00): Hi Jouanny, may we ask you to remove all tags where you used translation, please? At the moment tag has value - it will be assumed as "ok" and nobody will try to fix it, so if you want to see them corrected one day - better to remove incorrect values asap.
Jouanny (2025-03-28 14:49:20+00:00): Hi yrtimiD, thank you for your feedback. I went over the list of names which I've used an English translation tool to edit. I've removed all of them. The ones I didn't change are names I've found on wikipedia or blog. Feel free to tag me on any name:en you think are wrong.
jm428 (2025-03-17 15:47:40+00:00): I am going to revert this changeset because it looks like you moved the building outline to trace the roof of the building instead of where the base of the building is. When the imagery looks slanted for tall buildings (like with JQA in this case) tracing the roof doesn't give an accurate location for where the building actually is.
Frans S (2025-03-18 14:03:27+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key !
Best regards
StreetSurveyor (2025-04-27 19:26:57+00:00): Many roads in Boston have signs that say "private way" this doesn't reflect the access to them is restricted as your change would reflect. 

From the Wiki:
"Clarification of the term “private”
Note that access=private is intended to indicate that access is restricted, not whether the object is privately owned or not."
Allison P (2025-04-30 03:22:07+00:00): access=permissive and/or ownership=private would be more accurate
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-15 13:07:53+00:00): Ciao. Qui https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1367418330 non c'è separazione fisica. L'aggiunta di questa way complica solo il routing e non porta alcun beneficio. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163628826
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-17 09:41:03+00:00): Ciao. Vedo inoltre che hai declassificato "Via I Maggio" da tertiary a residential. Perché? Ciao, Andrea
bbqman (2025-03-14 21:59:43+00:00): also source: wikimedia commons
kapazao (2025-03-15 09:07:51+00:00): Hola, los aparcamientos que añadiste serían de este tipo https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:parking=street_side y usándolos en el editor iD podrías añadir más información a estos.
Te agradecería si pudieras corregirlos.

Un saludo y gracias por tus contribuciones.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163629042
SafwatHalaby (2025-03-19 00:10:32+00:00): This is probably better translated as "spot" rather than "corner". They are written the same in Hebrew.
Jouanny (2025-03-19 00:28:35+00:00): corrected, thank you!
b-jazz (2025-03-15 17:08:09+00:00): What exactly are you trying to troubleshoot? Maybe I can help.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-14 22:42:19+00:00): 163580843, 163585399, 163586597, 163589032, 163610562, 163612081, 163613487, 163614490, 163614771, 163615186, 163615863, 163616832, 163622726, 163624712
geisthugo123 (2025-03-23 23:51:50+00:00): Hi,
Danke für den Edit,
Kollidiert die Herabstufung der Schiller- und Nauheimer Straße auf residential nicht damit das Straßen nicht ihre OSM-Klasse verlieren sollen auf freier Strecke wie hier nach der Lindenstraße.
Habe da grade einen ähnlichen Fall woanders und ich konnte mit einem anderen Mapper nicht genau bewerten wie das jetzt gewertet wird.
vg
KartoGrapHiti (2025-03-24 07:03:38+00:00): Ich habe das geändert, weil dort eine Tempo-30-Zone ausgewiesen ist. In § 45 (1c) der StVO heißt es: "Die Zonen-Anordnung darf
sich weder auf Straßen des überörtlichen Verkehrs (Bundes-, Landes-
und Kreisstraßen) noch auf weitere Vorfahrtstraßen (Zeichen 306)
erstrecken." Da zwischen Friedrichsthal und Pfaffenwiesbach keine Kreisstraße, sondern eine Gemeindestraße verläuft, könnte es auch notwendig sein, diese Straße von tertiary auf unclassified herabzustufen. Der Ausbauzustand der Gemeindeverbindungsstraße und die Vorfahrt außerhalb der Tempo-30-Zone rechtfertigt aber ggf. auch tertiary, so dass ich das nicht geändert habe. Die Regel, dass Straßen nicht ihre OSM-Klasse verlieren sollen, ist mir so pauschal nicht bekannt. Bei klassifizierten Straßen (Kreis-, Landes- und Bundesstraßen) macht das Sinn. Kreisstraßen können aber auch in Orten enden, sind regelmäßig also auch Sackgassen, die nur vom klassifizierten Straßennetz in einen Ort quasi als Sackgasse führen. Hier scheint die Kommune entschieden zu haben, dass sie nicht möchte, dass die Gemeindeverbindungsstraße bis zur Kreisstraße durchgehen soll, denn sonst hätte sie keine Tempo-30-Zone eingerichtet, sondern eine Tempo-30-Strecke.
geisthugo123 (2025-03-27 23:41:42+00:00): Hi,
gut das mit der 30er-Zone leichter mir ein, das scheint mir so das eindeutigste zu sein.
Hab mich so ein bisschen an dem Wiki-Eintrag
" Wichtig ist, dass beim Übergang in den Ortsbereich kein Sprung in der Straßenklasse auftritt. Die Straße übernimmt also am Ortseingang üblicherweise die Klasse der zuführenden Straße. Wenn ein highway=unclassified innerorts zur Hauptstraße wird, ist innerorts ebenfalls unclassified zu wählen. "
aufgehalten weil ich darüber mit jemand anderen in einem anderen Changeset geredet hatte.
geisthugo123 (2025-03-27 23:46:33+00:00): Da geht es darum das dort nun ein secondary Abschnitt an zwei Tertiarys endet.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163639637#map=15/49.81624/8.63516
Glaube aber ohne Ortskenntnis kannst du bei der Frage wohl auch nicht wirklich weiterhelfen oder?
KartoGrapHiti (2025-03-28 06:39:05+00:00): Ser Aussage "Die Straße übernimmt also am Ortseingang üblicherweise die Klasse der zuführenden Straße." würde ich zustimmen. Allerdings würde ich das nur bei klassifizierten Straßen als Regel ansehen. Wenn die Regel ist, dass alle Gemeindestraßen, die zur Erschließung von Einzelgehöften außerorts als unclassified gelten, dann ist es die Regel, dass diese Straßen beim Andocken an ein Wohngebiet ihre Straßenklasse ändern. Am Ende ist es aber auch ein Problem von verschiedenen planerischen Zielen: Die einen wollen im Ortskern den Verkehr beruhigen und die anderen wollen die Geschwindigkeit des Verkehrs auf wichtigen Routen optimieren. Beides geht dann nicht zusammen.
Frans S (2025-03-17 13:16:06+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please solve the issues shown by the issue triangle before you upload your mappings.
Where a waterway crosses a highway you need to add a tag, describing the type of crossing.
Her, mostly a ford.
Best regards
NeisBot (2025-03-14 23:15:06+00:00): Hello Angelina Salazar, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1367426418

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163630377
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-15 00:27:07+00:00): Reverted by DWG - vandalism & nonsense mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163631601
NeisBot (2025-03-14 23:25:01+00:00): Hello Angelina Salazar, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1367427307

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163630555
rskedgell (2025-03-15 00:00:51+00:00): Thanks for fixing that! I really should check for mis-tagged living streets (nearly all of them in London) as part of routine QA.
honapak (2025-03-15 12:48:00+00:00): No problem. Yes, most of the ones I have come across have been incorrectly tagged, easy mistake to make I suppose.
CJJ2501 (2025-06-12 06:41:59+00:00): Hi honapak,
Just a quick question: The Seven Dials roundabout is now tagged as highway=pedestrian, but cars are still allowed to drive here, correct?
If yes, I think it would be good to add a motor_vehicle=yes tag.
honapak (2025-07-02 13:00:31+00:00): Hi CJJ, apologies for my late reply to this. It looks like some of the highways around Seven Dials have been retagged once again, this time as unclassified. After changing the living streets to pedestrian streets I wasn't entirely surely it was correct, only that they definitely weren't living streets. Cars are allowed as you say (I'm not sure what restrictions apply, if any) so while some of the roads here are designed to feel like pedestrian roads (particularly the roundabout) I think unclassified is likely more accurate, and that would imply motor vehicles can access these by default.
NeisBot (2025-03-14 23:46:05+00:00): Hello Angelina Salazar, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1367429092

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163630937
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-16 00:05:37+00:00): This changeset removed several roads and connections and added fake "detail".
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163630943
NeisBot (2025-03-14 23:54:40+00:00): Hello Angelina Salazar, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1367429591
https://osm.org/way/1367429590

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163631058
NeisReview (2025-03-15 06:29:43+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
NeisBot (2025-03-15 00:03:06+00:00): Hello Angelina Salazar, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1367430137

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163631191
ChillyDL (2025-04-15 19:58:38+00:00): Hallo NGL-engel, du hattest das Großsteingrab Hohe Steine Varnhorn eingezeichnet, laut Changeset-Kommentar nicht on the ground erhoben, sondern von strahlen.org/tw übernommen. Dafür hätte es eine Lizenz von strahlen.org gebraucht, deshalb habe ich den POI wieder herausgenommen.
NeisReview (2025-03-15 06:29:49+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-15 23:21:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17402
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-22 06:50:50+00:00): Reverted by DWG - deleting valid information

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163933728
NeisBot (2025-03-15 00:11:36+00:00): Hello Angelina Salazar, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1367430693
https://osm.org/way/1367430692

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163631298
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-15 00:27:08+00:00): Reverted by DWG - vandalism & nonsense mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163631601
tastrax (2025-03-22 09:49:06+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Warin61 (2025-03-25 09:26:00+00:00): Ops .. forgot the + ... 
thanks.
silversurfer83 (2025-03-23 17:44:39+00:00): Hi :)

Kurze Frage: In dem Gebäude ist quasi der Sitz des Clubs, ja? Es ist kein Hafen und keine Anlegestelle, oder? Diese Dinge befinden sich dann direkt am Wasser, nehme ich an.

Grüße
silversurfer83
plexxdev (2025-03-23 18:05:42+00:00): Ja das ist der Sitz des Clubs die stege befinden sich direkt davor im wasser
silversurfer83 (2025-03-23 18:15:21+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Reaktion.

Dann müssen wir da an den Eigenschaften (tags) noch ein bisschen was drehen. Melde mich dann nochmal
plexxdev (2025-03-23 18:59:20+00:00): Moin wie muss denn der Verein gekennzeichnet werden?
silversurfer83 (2025-03-23 20:19:06+00:00): So. Jetzt. Sorry.

Also: Wenn du ein Objekt anklickst und dann in der Spalte links (Bearbeite Objekt) ganz nach unten scrollst bis der Abschnitt "Eigenschaften" erscheint, dann kannst du alle Eigenschaften (tags) des Objekts im Klartext entweder als Tablle oder einfach als Textfeld sehen. (auf diese tags beziehe ich mich im Weiteren mit meinen Links ins Wiki)
Wenn du hier also "nur" das Clubheim hast, dann sollte dieser Punkt (node) folgende tags bekommen:
club=sport
sport=sailing
name=Hier bitte den Namen in voller Schreibweise
short_name=RFCM

außerdem gerne

contact:website=
contact:phone=
contact:instagram=
...

die drei tags

leisure=marina
seamark:...
seamark:...

gehören nicht an den Club node.

Was ich auf dem Luftbild noch sehen kann dürfte ein Slipway sein. Da kannst du dich gerne auch mal dran versuchen :)

Bei Gelegenheit sehe ich deine Änderungen, da ich einen gewissen Radius um das Waldecker Land beobachte und der Möhnesee da grad noch so drin ist.

Fragen kannst du jederzeit zB im Forum unter c.osm.org oder in einer der vielen Chatgruppen loswerden. Wenn es Zeit hat, auch direkt an mich.

Hier noch ein paar Links ins Wiki, wo du detaillierte Infos findest

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:club%3Dsport

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dslipway

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Realtime_chats

Mast und Schotbruch (?)

silversurfer83
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-15 00:22:48+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17395
AlbaireN (2025-08-24 21:50:04+00:00): Bonjour, je n'avais pas vu que l'itinéraire Nord-Sud avait été jalonné, c'est récent ?
TriRIK (2025-03-15 13:53:45+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163651512
Taya_S (2025-03-15 09:38:56+00:00): Reverted vandalism DWG Ticket#2025031510000179

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163642416
Taya_S (2025-03-15 09:38:57+00:00): Reverted vandalism DWG Ticket#2025031510000179

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163642416
jtracey (2025-03-15 02:02:54+00:00): Resolves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4291770