piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mga_geo (2024-11-07 14:09:21+00:00): Et la relation 11651231 est aussi "massacrée".
Pouvez-vous consulter le wiki et/ou demander des conseils sur le forum avant de faire ce genre de modifications.
mga_geo (2024-12-10 06:20:34+00:00): En l'absence de réponse, je vais corriger.
Unknown Registered User (2025-02-10 13:45:30+00:00): Hi, I think the current name is actually Via Zinirco, while Enrico Mattei is the older one.
Unknown Registered User (2025-02-10 13:46:58+00:00): I say that because the new mall indicates its address as Via Zinirco, 1
fayor (2025-02-10 14:09:59+00:00): Ciao, ti sbagli, è esattamente il contrario. Basta fare una ricerca per verificarlo. Il fatto che il centro commerciale si riferisca al vecchio nome dimostra soltanto che non si sono aggiornati.
JJIglesias (2024-11-02 21:09:22+00:00): Hola disculpa estas colocando predios y terrenos como edificios y eso NO ES CORRECTO. Por favor solo se dibujan las construcciones NO todo el area.
Por favor antes de seguir, revisa estas instrucciones, para q entiendas mejor:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Edificios
DerSeegurke (2024-11-04 13:06:12+00:00): Hi Lodda! Bei diesem Changeset ist das Wald-Polygon kaputt gegangen, weil ein Node es doppelt in den "outer"-Way geschafft hat: https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#issue_uuid=4986c74b-63a7-50b9-b4b7-00d0c316ab9f
Wenn du willst, kann ich das auch gerne beheben.
Die aktuelle Version von JOSM meldet diesen Fehler übrigens beim Upload. Es wäre wohl sinnvoll das mal zu updaten.
Lodda (2024-11-09 12:34:58+00:00): Danke! Behebe den Fehler bitte. Ich kenne mich mit Multipolygonen nicht so aus.
Lodda
DerSeegurke (2024-11-11 23:28:58+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung. Das hier hat inzwischen schon jemand anderes korrigiert :-)
https://www.osm.org/changeset/158807814
topolusitania (2024-11-02 19:07:46+00:00): Olá
Por favor tem cuidado com estas edições. Estás a apagar edições com mais de 9 anos! Um mapeador cuidadoso procura preservar o trabalho dos que o precederam e não apagar e fazer de novo. TL
JoaoPaixao (2024-11-02 19:13:39+00:00): Apagar edições??? Não sei se viste sequer a edição em causa, porque esta adiciona somente informação, não apaga nada.
topolusitania (2024-11-02 19:18:50+00:00): Estou com um tablet, a informação que recebo é esta:
Linha: 358267178
Versão #4
[Alteração] Estruturas; Uso do Solo
Eliminado há cerca de 1 hora por JoaoPaixao
topolusitania (2024-11-02 19:21:17+00:00): Histórico da Linha: 1329412405
Versão #2
[Alteração] Estruturas; Uso do Solo
Eliminado há cerca de 1 hora por JoaoPaixao
Conjunto de alterações #158670465
Versão #1
Edificios, Coberto vegetal
Editado há 3 dias por topolusitania
Conjunto de alterações #158548562
Etiquetas
building	yes
JoaoPaixao (2024-11-02 19:22:40+00:00): Neste https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158670465, sim de facto foi apagado sendo substituído por esta relação https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18242379
topolusitania (2024-11-02 19:42:05+00:00): Pois...
Por favor tem cuidado com estas edições. Estás a apagar edições com mais de 9 anos!
topolusitania (2024-11-02 19:42:58+00:00): E que, mais importante de tudo, se mantém válidas
JoaoPaixao (2024-11-02 20:18:12+00:00): Eu sei que o ideal é alterar algo existente e não apagar, mas num cenário que independentemente do tempo que foi adicionado há necessidade de apagar, não tem como evitar isso. Seja como for, a informação que existia de há 9 anos era building=yes, a mesma se mantém. Portanto nenhuma informação foi perdida
topolusitania (2024-11-03 11:37:24+00:00): Perdeste o histórico do elemento, que é tão ou mais importante que a informação actual. (Informa da evolução que sofreu até ao presente)

Se substituíres o desenho da via que circunda o edifício por um desenho novo, perdes tudo isto:

Histórico da Linha: 152480180
Versão #3
Edificios, Coberto vegetal
Editado há 4 dias por topolusitania
Conjunto de alterações #158548562
Etiquetas
highway	service
service	parking_aisle
surface	asphalt
Nós
21 nós
Versão #2
Add road surface info
Editado há mais de 2 anos por HainautCart@
Conjunto de alterações #117209008
Etiquetas
highway	service
service	parking_aisle
surface	asphalt
Nós
20 nós
Versão #1
(sem comentário)
Editado há mais de 12 anos por ftavares87
Conjunto de alterações #10829579
Etiquetas
highway	service
service	parking_aisle
Nós
20 nós

Como podes ver, esta via foi criada por um mapeador (ftavares87) há mais de 12 anos.  o ftavares87 gostaria de ver o seu trabalho respeitado.

Falas na necessidade de apagar um determinado elemento. Não o contesto se o prédio tivesse sido destruido por exemplo, ou sufrido profundas moificações. Neste caso parece ter sido apenas preguiça....
Uma ultima nota: com tantos edificios por mapear na Covilhã e arredores, porquê perder tempo em algo que já existe, minimamente correcto ?
Владимир К (2024-11-04 09:28:35+00:00): cleanup of what? there are 3 towers on the imagery and valid cables and circuits tags on the lines. It is just vamdalism
Владимир К (2024-11-04 10:09:14+00:00): reverted
dypa (2024-11-03 09:49:48+00:00): спасибо за уточнение положения светофора 👍
RedAuburn (2024-11-02 18:16:18+00:00): see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4504676
mike140 (2024-11-02 18:53:27+00:00): Якщо там нема знаку "житлова вулиця", краще тип дороги - service, тобто службова
DegA81 (2024-11-02 18:56:03+00:00): Зрозумів
дякую!
kapazao (2024-11-03 08:24:01+00:00): Hola, por favor cuidado con las ediciones y por favor trata de revisarlas.
Aquí te cargaste el etiquetado principal de una calle y ya básicamente desaparece del mapa.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1330230883

Un saludo
vehrka (2024-11-03 09:00:18+00:00): Hola, he revisado la edición de esa Calle, gracias por el aviso
tordans (2024-11-03 07:28:37+00:00): Hinweis: den Wert oberfläche Sand verwenden wir bei Spielplätzen eigentlich fast nie. Stattdessen die Angabe Sandkasten.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158671731
Mlvln (2024-11-03 10:07:10+00:00): Meinst du playground=sandpit? Ich wollte eher die gesamte Oberflächenbeschaffenheit beschreiben und nicht eine spezifische Spielmöglichkeit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158671731
adiatmad (2024-11-06 06:14:39+00:00): Hi shekillah, welcome to OpenStreetMap! It looks like the farmland was added as big buildings. Could you kindly review this?
---
Feel free to join the OSM India community on Telegram if you haven't yet, and enjoy connecting and learning with the community

>> https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158671904
jb54osm (2024-11-02 23:19:42+00:00): Dag McShea,

Welkom bij OSM.
Weet je zeker dat het huisnummer correct is? Volgens het BAG-systeem van gemeente en Kadaster is nr. 194 de kerk.
Kan het 194A zijn?
jb54osm (2024-11-02 23:29:14+00:00): Wat verder gezocht. Het is 194A. Ik heb de gegevens van Isero op nr. 194A gezet. Verder wat verdwaalde adresnodes hun eigen plaatsje teruggegeven.
eggie (2024-11-03 07:12:48+00:00): Welkomstbericht per PB verstuurd
Владимир К (2024-11-04 09:33:58+00:00): reverted
onovy (2024-11-23 18:11:05+00:00): Ahoj,

nízké sloupy el. vedení, na kterých vede power=minor_line se značí jako power=pole, nikoliv jako power=tower a to i přesto, že se jedná i příhradový stožár.

Detailněji zde:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Elektrick%C3%A1_veden%C3%AD

Díky.
bxl-forever (2024-11-02 21:43:24+00:00): Hello jbieber,

Are you sure that places like "spice mountain", "tea 2 you" or "farmer" must be spelt in lower case? This does not look like the standard practice in OSM.

It would be appreciated if you could:
– Upload changes in one area before moving out to another area, and in particular not edit places in France and in London in the same upload.
– Write changeset titles to explain what you are doing.  Leaving it blank or "no comment" sound very much like "It’s none of your business".

One more thing: it is very unlikely that toilets have a *name*, as you did here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12307747122  I suppose you meant that Farmer.J is the name of the business.  In that case, please use the "operator" tag and instead of "name"… and make sure that you spell it exactly as the place (cf. first part of my comment).

Thanks in advance.
tordans (2024-11-03 07:27:23+00:00): Der Wert Picknickside ist eigenartig. Das ist doch eher AußenGastronomie, oder?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158672408
Mlvln (2024-11-03 10:03:04+00:00): Das sind so eingezäunte Betonbänke. Am Tor steht privat und der Name einer Firma. (Details habe ich nicht im Kopf. Bin spazieren gegangen und habe später zuhause geändert.) Vielleicht ein Pausenort für Angestellte? Ich habe nur das access tag auf privat gesetzt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158672408
CurlingMan13 (2024-11-03 03:06:49+00:00): Why did you get rid of this ride?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158672428
CurlingMan13 (2024-11-03 03:06:22+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM.

When submitting changesets. please use a more descriptive changeset comment telling us what you did, and why.

You can read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158672468
Владимир К (2024-11-04 12:17:09+00:00): reverted
CurlingMan13 (2024-11-03 03:06:09+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM.

When submitting changesets. please use a more descriptive changeset comment telling us what you did, and why.

You can read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158672562
Владимир К (2024-11-04 12:15:25+00:00): reverted
Владимир К (2024-11-04 12:15:33+00:00): reverted
Владимир К (2024-11-04 12:14:47+00:00): reverted
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-11-03 11:12:26+00:00): Hi,
This is a narrow cycleway, no pedestrian access
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1329453833
I usually map such cycleways directly on carraigeway with cycleway=track, don't know why I've mapped this one seprately
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-11-03 11:23:31+00:00): Also it should be possible to go on bicycle in direction I've indicated with red arrow, but those small two blue places won't allow routing due to them being one-way. 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Q2A6dQMYOq1Nzyy8Gm1qWTTl4zvf0Isx/view?usp=sharing

https://scontent-hel3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/464789610_1075362797628421_7832533533403451347_n.jpg?_nc_cat=102&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=bd9a62&_nc_ohc=xQ6eR15suSAQ7kNvgHZp2I-&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-hel3-1.xx&_nc_gid=AIJRZAFKuTqBVBwknZGUoXW&oh=00_AYDKCP3iRh2lyESLMrICBEXbRjOq4hmPNRT3oJrrczWnPw&oe=672D2703
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-11-03 11:33:19+00:00): It seems you've accidentally changed the direction of this way which made oneway work in incorrect direction
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1328878990
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-11-03 11:36:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1329453843

no bicycle=designated tag
Apirnus (2024-11-03 13:01:19+00:00): Implemented required fixes.

Changeset: 158698124
Владимир К (2024-11-04 12:14:56+00:00): reverted
Владимир К (2024-11-04 12:09:25+00:00): reverted
Владимир К (2024-11-04 12:06:42+00:00): what the source of absence 750 kV here?
https://energybase.ru/substation/PS_750_kV_Vladimirskaya
Владимир К (2024-11-04 12:09:34+00:00): reverted
Владимир К (2024-11-04 12:01:13+00:00): reverted
Lukas615 (2025-01-06 01:18:48+00:00): Hallo Michael,
in diesem und den Changesets 158688366 und 158705717 hast du bei der Berliner U-Bahn Signale als Hauptsignale nach BOStrab eingetragen. Tatsächlich sind die Signale der Berliner U-Bahn allerdings etwas spezifischer (Hp 3 und Hp 4), haben andere Bezeichnungen (z.B. Hp 0 statt H 0) und haben ein anderes Erscheinungsbild (z.B. haben die Vorsignale nur einen gelben und einen grünen Lichtpunkt statt jeweils 2).
Aufgefallen ist mir deine Eintragung auch nur wegen dem merkwürdigen Rendering der OpenRailwayMap.
Gruß Lukas
Владимир К (2024-11-04 12:07:35+00:00): reverted
Владимир К (2024-11-04 10:56:39+00:00): reverted
Hans_Hy (2024-11-04 19:09:13+00:00): Why?
The 3 towers are one functional unit and the 3 phase never diverge from each other.
Understand what you are mapping, and why it is not represented this way within the industry.
Владимир К (2024-11-04 19:22:44+00:00): удаление верных данных, массовая правка без обсуждения с сообществом. 
индустрия? о какой инсдустрии вы говорите? как она связана с данными в этой базе?
Hans_Hy (2024-11-04 19:37:25+00:00): see the wiki on monopolar or guyed monopolar... 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:design#Towers_or_pylons

Mostly used as an anchor tower at very high voltage and/or long spans. This tower type is typically used in groups of three, with each carrying one phase. There are two recommended options for mapping such a group. Either map all three towers and connect the power line to the middle tower. Or map only one tower and add the attribute triple_tower=yes to the tower.

No recommendations for splitting out the phases and noting Circuit = 1/3
Владимир К (2024-11-04 19:42:31+00:00): Рекомендация не запрет
Hans_Hy (2024-11-04 19:43:53+00:00): No one maps high voltage circuits, seperating out single phases and noting as "1/3" except for the group of editors working around Moscow & Russia.

The 3 towers are one functional unit, no differently than th e power line with all 3 of its phases is a single functional unit.

Now you have reverted all my corrections to this flawed/incorrect and non-electric grid industry standard editors have adopted for themselves on OSM.
Hans_Hy (2024-11-04 19:50:58+00:00): Look at this and tell me each circuit having "3x weighting" is in any way correct?

And for what, because someone needs to map every tower individually.  When do we start mapping the 2 tower feet of an H-Tower, or the 4 feet of lattice towers.

There is no reason to map all 3 monopolar towers and the individual phases.

https://openinframap.org/#13.51/56.4823/38.20536
TrickyFoxy (2024-11-14 23:10:22+00:00): > No one maps high voltage circuits, seperating out single phases and noting as "1/3" except for the group of editors working around Moscow & Russia.

That's not true

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/?key=circuits&value=1%2F3#map
Hans_Hy (2024-11-15 11:34:17+00:00): Now show the distribution of circuits = 1 or circuits = 2.

Tag Info - "No English language description for this tag in the wiki."  Overview - 2,585 uses, out of tens of millions of towers mapped. Chronology - is not used until Summer of 2020 (12 years after OSM started). 

All these lines were mapped properly and tagged properly before these extra towers and the 1/3 tag was added.  They add no value to the project, clutter maps and unnecessarily weight sections of lines.... similar to adding rail marshaling yards that do not exist to a rail line.
TrickyFoxy (2024-11-15 11:41:42+00:00): > Now show the distribution of circuits = 1 or circuits = 2.

Lol, of course there are more of them because there are more direct sections of power lines.

>  They add no value to the project, clutter maps and unnecessarily weight sections of lines.... 

This is your personal opinion, which seems to be based on mapping for rendering. What I can say for sure is that with this approach, you remove power tower and lines that have the right to be displayed on the map.
Владимир К (2024-11-04 10:56:32+00:00): reverted
Владимир К (2024-11-04 10:56:25+00:00): reverted
eggie (2024-11-03 07:14:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-11-03 07:18:42+00:00): Feedback Door access=no te taggen op een aantal wegen is de wandelroute Berg en Bosroute geblokkeerd. Hoe loopt die route dan wel?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-11-03 07:38:08+00:00): De Berg en Bosroute Apeldoorn te voet heb ik nu voorlopig omgeleid via het Lammertspad (fietspad) .
Mocht het noordelijk deel van op access=no gezette gedeelte toch eigenlijk foot=permissive kunnen staan dan kan ik de route weer terugleggen. De originele route is aangegeven dmv blue:white:blue_pointer:Atv

Een reactie wordt op prijsgesteld.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-11-03 07:39:37+00:00): Het Martpad is door u ook op slot gezet met access=no, maar heeft een uitzondering voor mtb=yes? 
Klopt dat nog wel?
eggie (2024-11-03 07:45:39+00:00): Typo Martpad..

Hier de nu voorlopig omgelegde wandelroute https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=16.0/52.2162/5.9069
Tdevries (2024-11-03 10:36:26+00:00): Beste Eggie, 
Alle paden tussen het fietspad (Lammertspad) en de grens met het Kroondomein zijn per 1 november afgesloten ivm reacreatiezonering. Ook voor MTB.
Zie ook: https://www.gelderland.nl/projecten/recreatiezonering-op-de-veluwe/zoneringskaart
MVG
TdeVries
Tdevries (2024-11-03 10:46:20+00:00): Ik heb voor het martpad MTB=no aangepast. Een eventuele wandelroute kan inderdaad niet meer hierlangs lopen, De bewegwijzering Apeldoorn te voet was laatstelijk nog niet aangepast, dus die kan voor nu het beste langs het Lammertspad. 
Hartelijk dank voor uw feedback.
MVG
TdeVries
TrickyFoxy (2024-11-03 10:50:57+00:00): На такой длинный участок реки накидывать одинаковую ширину такое себе
Владимир К (2024-11-04 09:21:06+00:00): Reverted
TrickyFoxy (2024-11-03 10:53:17+00:00): Если уж хотите обозначить ширину реки, то разрежьте линию реки и задайте ширину получившемуся куску.

Рисовать водный полигон внутри другого не нужно
joost schouppe (2024-11-08 10:31:32+00:00): Thanks for all the work. Please do state your sources & leave a changeset comment
AgusQui (2024-11-05 03:39:53+00:00): Por favor se más prolijo en la adición de landuses, también tene en cuenta la diferencia entre "commercial" y "retail" no es lo mismo, ver la wiki.
Filip009 (2024-11-03 09:51:08+00:00): Zdravím, jedná sa o cyklochodník, alebo cyklotrasu?
Jdsaadanlsdkhaiosdueiouo (2024-11-03 11:44:29+00:00): Je to nový cyklochodník.
Filip009 (2024-11-04 08:38:35+00:00): Okej, vďaka za objasnenie.
emersonveenstra (2024-11-02 21:07:52+00:00): Hi there,

Are you sure this is a hamlet? It seems more like a neighborhood, since it's a built up area with no legal designation that i can find
Taya_S (2026-01-15 08:24:43+00:00): Reverted as vandalism/import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177248701
silversurfer83 (2024-11-02 20:43:26+00:00): Danke
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158675834
Glassman (2024-11-03 21:54:45+00:00): #TIP: street names are spelled out in OSM. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. Could you expand the names of the roads you added and updated? I'll send you more info in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158676103
doug_sfba (2024-11-09 20:37:11+00:00): Why are some of the new trails in BCR tagged access=no? Are they not open to the public?
Ruthless78 (2024-11-09 21:48:35+00:00): Hi Doug.  The access is yes for foot and horses for trails that are currently open to the public.  The area south of Radio Hill Trail and east of Bear Creek Road is closed to the public.  See official map: 
 https://www.openspace.org/sites/default/files/maps/map_BCR_0.pdf
TrickyFoxy (2024-11-03 11:06:38+00:00): 👋 Не стоит в name= писать тип объекта. Например, по building=house и так понятно, что это частный дом
eggie (2024-11-03 07:25:29+00:00): Dag T  d Vries,
Hier heb ik de bosweg uitkomend op de Groemewoudselaan weer losgemaakt van het bosvlak en teruggelegd.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=158677632
Tdevries (2024-11-03 17:38:40+00:00): Dankuwel :)
Paul Berry (2025-04-25 12:45:50+00:00): Hi,

Please note we're not allowed to use what3words data in OpenStreetMap, even if they're posted on a sign, so I have removed them. Please read if you would like to know why: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What3words

Thanks for your understanding.

Regards,
_Paul_
Stifi0815 (2025-03-03 22:33:01+00:00): Hello,
can you explain why you tagged climbing on the east side of Ringkamp? I know that there are many climbing routes on this face but that that is true for any other wall within Hochschwab (and likely all other Mountains). I am not sure if it makes sense to tag all faces. So far I did not see this at OSM. What do you think?
-=|MisterY|=- (2025-03-04 13:33:53+00:00): Hi! I'm adding the missing climbing tags to some items that are already on the map, or adding new crags and areas for those that are not. I'm adding the data from other public climbing sources. There are a lot of items in OSM that are missing the climbing tags, which were probably agreed-upon later.
With these tags, the items will appear on https://openclimbing.org/ or other renderers which have implemented the new tagging scheme (see Climbing on the wiki).
Ringkamp, here, I've added as a node. I usually add routes and group them into a Crag relation if I'm visiting the area.
If you know some more climbing areas/crags, please do get in touch with me. I'd be happy to add them to the map.
If you're into climbing, you can also add them yourself. I'd be happy to discuss anything about the tagging scheme for climbing as I'm quite interested to get more of it into OSM.
-=|MisterY|=- (2025-03-04 13:37:21+00:00): Oh, it would be nice if all faces were climbable and had topos available. :)
See, i.e. https://www.bergsteigen.com/touren/klettern/vilya/
-=|MisterY|=- (2025-03-04 13:51:11+00:00): >I am not sure if it makes sense to tag all faces. 

Of course not. Just those that have known climbing routes. Meaning somebody has climbed them, suggested a grade, and there is a topo available for other climbers.
Stifi0815 (2025-03-04 21:00:22+00:00): Thanks for the discussion! Maybe this should discussed in a broader manner within the OSM community. To me this looks like a significant change in tagging strategy. Is there already some thread in a forum on community.openstreetmap.org?

But please don't get me wrong! I am fully open to new ideas and approaches but I think this should be discussed within the community. I should also mention that I do not consider myself to be an OSM expert.

My 2cent:
I consider myself being an climbing expert in Hochschwab region (repeated more than 60 different routes and did a few first ascents). And yes it is the case that (almost) all faces have established climbing routes along with topos. To my knowledge, there are four guidebooks available  (latest was released 2020) and also some guidebooks having selected climbs of this area. So we speak about 500 to 1000 routes. I am not sure if OSM the best database to document this, especially for alpine style routes like we discuss here. Typically, they are in vertical direction, while OSM is more focused on horizontal data :-). Tagging each face with sport=climbing does not bring any valuable information in my opinion.