piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rskedgell_import (2025-11-11 12:44:49+00:00): These are matches which I rejected on inspection before upload. Although I restored the tags to their previous state using JOSM's history tool, that doesn't clear the action=modify attribute which the script sets on the <way> element in the OSM XML file and still increments the version. If it happens a lot, I'll have to find a way to avoid it.

Taking w681862761 as an example, it's mapped as a mid-terrace building on Walpole Road. Although it comfortably fits within an INSPIRE polygon, there appear to be 6 buildings to its north, but only 5 INSPIRE polygons. I can't be confident that the building would still be in the same INSPIRE polygon after someone realigns the terrace.

(In this case, Bing aerial imagery shows that the "terrace" is actually a mix of semis and terrace. I'll fix that in a minute.)
spiregrain (2025-11-11 13:03:22+00:00): Makes sense, and thanks for the response.
rskedgell (2025-11-25 17:55:10+00:00): I've found out how to fix this problem. Using "update selection" (Ctlr+Alt+U) in JOSM removes the action=modify attribute for features which haven't actually changed.
spiregrain (2025-11-26 08:45:07+00:00): Another mystery solved!
mike140 (2025-11-19 21:55:13+00:00): Навіщо було видаляти тег будівлі? Правку скасовую
eggie (2025-11-11 13:44:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Je info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-11-12 09:52:14+00:00): 
Deze tags staan nu nog op het gebouw https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/276906880

Groet,
eggie
AndyB_66 (2025-11-11 14:29:56+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Good_changeset_comments
GanderPL (2025-11-11 15:05:42+00:00): O co Ci chodzi? Edycja wykonana za pomocą StreetComplete, tzn nie mam wpływu na treść komentarza changeset. Pretensje kieruj do autora aplikacji.
kabelhaai (2025-11-30 03:28:26+00:00): Please avoid using tag is_in= to describe locations or anything else. The tag is not widely used and almost always better alternatives exist such as this dedicated aed location tag.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Ddefibrillator
TrickyFoxy (2025-11-14 11:02:40+00:00): Откуда вы берёте эти места?
AndyB_66 (2025-11-11 14:30:15+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Good_changeset_comments
AndyB_66 (2025-11-11 14:29:30+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Good_changeset_comments
SomeoneElse (2026-01-02 00:16:13+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/788299903/history is now wheelchair=yes;limited - do you happen to know which it is?
honapak (2026-01-15 14:39:11+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out. I've changed it to wheelchair=yes in 177261835, but I'm not totally sure so I've also added wheelchair:description as well.
SomeoneElse (2026-01-15 14:59:45+00:00): Thanks!
eggie (2025-11-11 13:47:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Probeer svp winkels bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode.
Er is nu geen adres en/of het is onvolledig. 
Werving onder description wordt behandeld als spam en zal worden verwijderd.
Alleen een neutrale beschrijving is toegestaan binnen OSM. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-11-11 13:51:45+00:00): De juiste tag is shop=pet
voor dierbenodigdheden.
MVG
eggie
tux67 (2025-11-11 14:51:19+00:00): Hi, welcher User? Gibt es eine Note dazu?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174508808
bartgron (2025-11-11 22:29:11+00:00): Czy biuro nieruchomości zajmuje CAŁY budynek (oba piętra)?
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:39:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321398 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - China
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:39:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321398 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - China
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-12 04:26:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/843140608

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:39:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321398 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - China
AndyB_66 (2025-11-11 14:28:22+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Comino (2025-11-11 16:41:59+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes".

The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NOT accepted.
Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Cryptocurrencies_with_payment_tag and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:*#Cryptocurrencies

Please REMOVE the payment:cryptocurrencies=yes !

Thank you.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
ilias_ (2025-11-11 14:06:27+00:00): Hi, I know that place, access is not private, you can enter and leave whenever you want, there are no closed barriers.
ApaRiver (2025-11-12 16:47:00+00:00): Hi ilias_,
Thank you for the information! I will go ahead and remove the private tags.
Have a nice day!
Frank Peng (2025-12-19 07:16:11+00:00): Why did you change the direction of those one-way roads as going the opposite direction of the actual one-way restriction of those roads on the ground? You don't want to make routing software direct drivers to go on the wrong side of a divided road or go the wrong way on a one-way road. That error you made on OSM could potentially put lives at risk, cause accidents, and cause drivers to be stopped by police for going the wrong way. The United States drives on the right-hand side of the road, not the left-hand side. Many data consumers use OSM data for their maps or routing software, and they rely on the data to be correct in order for routing to be correct and accurate. So don't mess up the map data for data consumers.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway

Also, you deleted the gate nodes from those roads. I can clearly see in Bing Streetside images from 2014 and 2022 that the gates are clearly there. Did those gates get removed recently? What is the source for the removal of the gates?
Frank Peng (2026-01-05 00:34:42+00:00): Changeset reverted
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176840793
czebureks (2025-11-13 14:08:10+00:00): Cześć,
dzięki za edycję. Poprawiłem ten dom w budowie i teren wokół niego zgodnie z tym co widać w warstwie Obrazowanie świata Esri (która ma najnowsze zdjęcia tego obszaru) oraz wyrównałem do warstwy Geoportal 2: Granice działek. Sprawdź proszę, czy obecny stan zgadza się z Twoimi obserwacjami terenowymi. Pozdrawiam
zdzichu (2025-11-14 13:36:23+00:00): Dom jest OK, natomiast płot jest postawiony aż do ścieżki, obejmuje fragment lasu poza działką.
czebureks (2025-11-15 00:47:19+00:00): Okej, poprawiłem zgodnie z Twoim opisem
Jorik “GingerLionXx” Seisveld (2025-11-12 18:31:37+00:00): Dag Dalfsenaartje, 
Ik heb 2 dagen geleden de tunnels toegevoegd aan OSM. Echter ik ben het niet geheel eens met het feit dat het tunnel gedeelte een track is. Door een veetunnel kunnen namelijk geen "normale" vierwielige voertuigen. Hierdoor kan men hooguit lopend of met een fiets doorheen. Daarom vind ik een path beter passen. Hoe sta jij hier in?
Jorik
Dalfsenaartje (2025-11-14 08:31:34+00:00): Ja daar zat ik ook al over te denken, lijkt me een prima oplossing!
BCNorwich (2025-11-12 08:04:44+00:00): Another duplicated section of highway, Way: 1449648488 fixed.
AndyB_66 (2025-11-11 14:27:21+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn
ph4ni (2025-11-12 17:28:38+00:00): Hello, please stop changing state highways to trunk roads for rendering purposes. Kindly revert all of your tagging changes on highways following 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India/Tags/Highway
user_23482473 (2025-11-16 04:08:04+00:00): Hello brother , recently this road was upgraded to NATIONAL HIGHWAYS 516E.

This the new alignment. Old road road was changed to state highway and Ghat section was upgraded to NATIONAL HIGHWAYS 516E to develop rural tribal areas .
user_23482473 (2025-11-16 04:09:37+00:00): Using official document I have Changed the and I have made bypass streches along this new national highways
arjunaraoc (2025-11-18 23:36:50+00:00): Can you provide the details of official document such as URL etc or an extract of such document from which the changes are being made?
Endres Pelka (2025-11-12 12:16:26+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
The changeset comments are not "for the sake of it", they're for the community!
Comino (2025-11-11 16:42:21+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes".

The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NOT accepted.
Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Cryptocurrencies_with_payment_tag and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:*#Cryptocurrencies

Please REMOVE the payment:cryptocurrencies=yes !

Thank you.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
AlaskaDave (2025-11-12 00:25:44+00:00): It looks like you got all of them Mateusz. 

Dave
AndyB_66 (2025-11-11 14:26:03+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
tux67 (2025-11-11 14:51:29+00:00): Gleiche Frage ..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174511645
Lostmonkey (2025-11-12 17:31:46+00:00): Probably shouldn't be a row of 'amenity=charging_station' but several 'man_made=charge_point' and only one station point/area.
Map_HeRo (2026-01-15 15:23:42+00:00): Hallo STW_2025, willkommen bei OSM. Du hast hier einige Bearbeitungen an der Biogasanlage vorgenommen. Aus welcher Quelle stammen denn diese Informationen? Auf dem Luftbild kann man nicht erkennen, wo sich genau die BHKW befinden und wie viele es sind.  Auch der Löschwassertank ist auf dem Luftbild nicht zu erkennen. Ist das der grüne Kasten rechts von dem von Dir gesetzten Punkt?

Für weitere Bearbeitungen: Bitte etwas aussagekräftigere CS-Kommentare schreiben, wie z.B. "Biogasanlage Treischfeld aktualisiert".

Gruß Mikke
STW_2025 (2026-01-27 13:37:43+00:00): Hallo Mikke,
Ich bin Ortskundig und kenne die Biogasanlage. der Löschwasserbehälter befindet sich unterirdisch. Ich habe für das Objekt ein Brandschutzkonzept für die Feuerwehr erstellt, von daher kann ich für die Richtigkeit der von mir gemachten Änderungen garantieren. Mittlerweile wurde aber schon wieder einiges hinzugebaut.
Map_HeRo (2026-01-28 11:46:45+00:00): Hallo STW-2025, 

Danke für die Info. Erhebung vor Ort ist natürlich immer die beste Quelle, das sollte beim Abspeichern einer Änderungssatzes dann auch immer angegeben werden - es wird beim Hochladen ein entsprechendes preset angeboten.

Wie kommt man denn an das Löschwasser des Bodentanks ran? Gibt es da ein Standrohr mit einer Storz-Kupplung? Ich würde das gerne noch komplettieren.

Auf jeden Fall Danke für Deine Mitarbeit, die immer willkommen ist!
Gruß Mikke
STW_2025 (2026-01-28 14:48:24+00:00): Hey Mikke,
sorry habe das leider übersehen, bin noch sehr neu im Thema OSM.
Die Löschwasserzisterne fasst 50.000 l und der Eigentümer hat eine A Storz-Kupplung zur Wasserentnahme für die Feuerwehr installiert. 
LG
Map_HeRo (2026-01-28 15:12:54+00:00): Kein Problem, man muss sich da langsam rantasten. Eine Biogasanlage ist als Startobjekt auch nicht so gut geeignet, da sie zu den komplizierteren Objekten gehört und es bisher noch keine wirklich eindeutige Richtlinie dafür gibt. Ich befasse mich gerade näher mit dem Thema, daher auch meine Nachfrage. Werde die Anlage heute Abend noch einmal überarbeiten. Auf jeden Fall ist der Input von persönlicher Kenntnis eines Objektes immer wertvoll.
Gruß Mikke
Frans S (2025-11-11 15:49:04+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please map more accurate and follow the rooflines more accurate. Square each rectangular building.
Shift multistory buildings to their footprint.
Check this out please
On this task, the high-rise buildings are often incorrect mapped.
You can see both one or more side walls and the roof. The Imagery is taken under a certain angle, so you can see more .
Often all visible walls and roofs are mapped as 1 building.
The correct way is to map the roofline and move the whole object on their footprint.
See this video.
https://youtu.be/dsfUcslLtVc?si=bEHwRl1sxDI_GA0H
Best regards
eggie (2025-12-07 14:30:15+00:00): Schuiven met de kaart geeft vaak schade. Hier ook. Het is inmiddels weer hersteld.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=174513033

warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 	8
MVG
eggie
Taya_S (2025-11-11 18:03:40+00:00): Hello,

I had a question. Whose 'user reports' are these? Where does this data come from? How was it verified?

Best regards,
Taya Snijder
Andrea Musuruane (2025-11-11 15:06:55+00:00): Ciao. Non è corretto rimuovere dalla mappa delle feature esistenti. Se la strada è ad esclusivo accesso privato, bisogna usare l'etichetta access=private. Ripristino la situazione in modo da permettere una etichettatura corretta. Ciao, Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2025-11-11 15:07:42+00:00): Ripristino strada esistente. Da etichettare opportunamente.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174516037
AndyB_66 (2025-11-11 14:25:57+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
evgenykatyshev (2025-11-11 17:41:02+00:00): The same issue as in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174514238
evgenykatyshev (2025-11-11 17:41:05+00:00): The same issue as in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174514238
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:44:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321598 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Sudan
aceman444 (2025-11-30 22:11:40+00:00): Zdravim, pride mi divne, ze v JOSM sa Vam podarilo tak poskodit relacie MHD: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=18.11888&lat=48.30866&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes . JOSM by mal vediet rozseknute cesty vlozit do relacii v spravnom poradi a teda zachovat logiku. To iD robi somariny a preusporiadava cleny ako sa mu zachce. Viete si spomenut ako ste to robili? Mali ste v JOSM nacitane len cesty a nie relacie, v ktorych su clenmi?
VJMK (2025-11-11 20:17:58+00:00): What tweaks involve an area from France to Afghanistan?
BCNorwich (2025-11-12 06:16:00+00:00): When I realised what I'd done, I reverted the changeset.
BCNorwich (2025-11-12 06:17:50+00:00): That was Changeset 174514219
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:42:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321533 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Nigeria
habi (2026-05-18 05:29:22+00:00): Genau wie bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181999188 hast du hier den Namen des Restaurants mit dem Namen des Ortes ersetzt, das stimmt nicht.
habi (2026-05-18 05:32:27+00:00): In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182812157 korrigiert
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:44:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321607 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Tanzania
evgenykatyshev (2025-11-11 17:39:55+00:00): Please put only Georgian names to the main name tag. English name can be added to additional tag name:en.

Also English name shouldn't contain abbreviation. Please replace "Str." with "Street"
qoro (2025-11-21 10:16:38+00:00): Understood, I'll do that right now
Branko Kokanovic (2025-12-05 11:01:05+00:00): Jel jos zatvoren? Is it still closed?
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:43:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321588 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - South Africa
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:38:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321361 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Bolivia
ilias_ (2025-11-11 15:40:42+00:00): Welcome and thanks for your efforts. You're doing a great job. Just a tip: there's no need to add addr:city, really. The most useful address could be addr:housenumber and addr:street, but addr:city is redundant because the map already knows what city boundary the node is inside, so no need to add it.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:39:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321366 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Brazil
eggie (2025-11-11 15:06:10+00:00): Dag Remco.. dan is access=private toch voldoende. Al die andere accesstags ku nen weg.

Mvg
eggie
Remco Gerlich (2025-11-11 15:23:47+00:00): Klinkt logisch, bedankt voor de tip. Ben een beginner. Zal het aanpassen.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:45:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321643 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Venezuela
FUZZY_42 (2025-12-06 19:17:14+00:00): Откуда информация то, что улицу Янги Узбекистан переименовали в Янги Ташкент??
NFZANMNIM (2025-12-08 06:13:12+00:00): В телеграм-канале «Uzbek avtoyulqumita» есть публикация, в которой они прямо пишут следующее:
https://t.me/s/avtoyulqumita/77083

O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Vazirlar Mahkamasining 2024-yil 4-iyuldagi “O‘zbekiston Respublikasining umumiy foydalanishdagi avtomobil yo‘llarining ro‘yxatini tasdiqlash to‘g‘risida”gi 383-sonli qaroriga asosan, "Yangi O‘zbekiston yo‘li" D029 “Yangi Toshkent avtomobil yo‘liga”o'zgartirildi.
FUZZY_42 (2025-12-08 12:53:57+00:00): Странно, постановление вышло полтора года назад, но не на одном картографическом ресурсе не обновилось )))
Ну хорошо, только в name:en надо будет исправить с "TOshkent" на "TAshkent"  ))
eggie (2025-11-11 16:03:59+00:00): Remco...  Er is wel iets voor in de plaats gekomen. Dat heb ik toegevoegd.
MVG
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:26:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186320984 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Argentina
SomeoneElse (2025-11-14 11:42:21+00:00): Just checking, is this OK?
A local mapper remapped it recently to reflect some realignment due to ongoing work on the A30.
Appently it changes fairly regularly so I guess it might be back to this again...
Simon Sustrans (2025-11-18 11:16:13+00:00): I'm happy to defer to the local mapper as I have not been at this location for a few years. I know there are changes associated with the A30 works.
SomeoneElse (2025-11-19 21:18:46+00:00): OK, I've changed that back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174879700 . The previous conversation was in 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174120016 - the author of that is the person to talk to about where it really goes!
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:26:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186320984 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Argentina
ilias_ (2025-11-11 15:38:09+00:00): Qu'est ce que tu fais? Tu as changé la route en une barrière... ce n'est pas une barrière. Si tu veux marquer la route en tant que privée, alors rajoute access=private, mais pitié ne la transforme pas en barrière...
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-12 04:26:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142983750

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:40:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321439 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Germany
kitsee (2025-11-12 00:43:31+00:00): Hi there Jazz,
Thanks for contributing to OSM. I've taken the liberty to fix some of the mapping here. Both indoor mapping and multi-level mapping are quite advanced mapping topics so I would suggest you try to avoid them until you have more experience with OSM. 

With the multi story mapping, the tag you was mostly missing is `level`. the downstairs area should have `level=0`. upstairs, `level=1`. Unfortunately ID, the OSM online editor, doesn't seem to support the level tag and doesn't allow you to filter by level like other editors which would make things a lot harder.

One other thing I wish to mention is to please avoid inventing paths. when mapping in the UK specifically, pedestrians are allows on all types of highway by default. so in situations where there is no separate path and the path simply ends are a road way then it should be connected to the road way directly. This allows the routers to direct pedestrians along the road way instead of them trying to find a separate path that doesn't exist. 

One last thing I feel I should mention about mapping separate sidewalks as I seen you've done a few. Mapping sidewalks using separate ways instead of using the `sidewalk` tags is a very controversial and debated topic. What you've done is not wrong but some people wont agree with it. I tend to use separate sidewalks sparingly, usually where the sidewalks become complex like at a intersections for example. 

Please feel free to ask questions you may have. I'm also active on the forums and on the osm discord. there are quite a few of us welshies on the discord so you'll be more than welcome. there also dedicate channels on there for people looking for mapping help which may be of use to you. I hope i havent scared you away with this mile long comment :)

Kind regards,
Kits
BCNorwich (2025-11-12 07:43:15+00:00): Hi Jazz,
Another problem is with crossing highways, these should be differentiated with the layer tag so that routing will understand which highway is above or below another. Indoor highways would then have both a level and layer tag.

In several of your changesets you've made duplicated sections of highways, (highway on top of another highway). This duplication could cause disruption to routing. I've corrected many of these instances. 

Regards Bernard.
felipeeugenio (2025-11-11 16:43:09+00:00): Hola. por favor consultar con la comunidad o la wiki por los tags que usa. No e sla idea corregir cada cosa que hace. Estamos para ayudarlo, pero por favor tomar contacto:

access=no es otra cosa (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dno) Con permissive o private estaba bien.

footway tiene foot=yes implícito, no hace falta agregarlo.
Access=no

building_passage es totalmente otra cosa (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage). 

Y por favor cuadrar los edificios con la letra Q, que cada vez que los tocan se deforman.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174515822
Gabriele Confortola (2025-11-11 15:26:51+00:00): Strada etichettata come privata
ilias_ (2025-11-11 15:44:16+00:00): Hi, another tip, adding a name:fr identical to name doesn't have any added value. It doesn't improve searchability. The name is already searchable enough, adding the same name in name:fr is useless.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:26:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186320989 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Armenia
DaveF (2025-11-12 11:15:48+00:00): Hi What is ref:GB:HER:Angus?
tagishsimon (2025-11-17 11:40:49+00:00): points to this - https://online.aberdeenshire.gov.uk/smrpub/master/default.aspx?Authority=Angus