piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 17:53:06+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160404990
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 17:53:07+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160404990
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:10:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 17:44:43+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160404670
Glassman (2024-12-19 18:54:09+00:00): You added a couple of fords on the South Fork Fortune Creek but the stream was shown to go through a colvert. If the culvert is there, then the ford should be remove, else the culvert should be removed. Since you are familiar with this area, can you review your edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160379109
Glassman (2024-12-19 18:57:23+00:00): $TIP: save and upload your edits before moving on to  a more distant location.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160379109
maro21 (2024-12-23 18:14:30+00:00): Mógłbyś podać uzasadnienie tej edycji? Dla mnie nie jest to oczywiste, dlaczego ten zestaw został wycofany.
pavvv (2024-12-23 19:42:19+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Possible_tagging_mistakes
Tag access=emergency jest raczej rzadko używany i tutaj nie daje pełnych danych. Powinno się zamiast tego używać emergency=yes + access=yes/no. W przypadku access=yes, emergency=yes jest wtedy zbędny, a access=no może być zawsze ignorowany przez służby uprzywilejowane, więc jest to opcjonalny tag.
Użytkownik jeszcze dał ten tag tylko drodze wjazdowej, co jest dość dziwne, chyba że przed akurat tą drogą stoi znak zakazujący wjazdu, co jak wspomniałem wcześniej nie było poprawnie oznaczone.

W ogóle zauważyłem, że wszyscy mapperzy z Bolta wprowadzają dziwne zmiany, często niezgodne z rzeczywistością.
maro21 (2024-12-23 18:16:17+00:00): Mógłbyś podać uzasadnienie tej edycji? Dla mnie nie jest to oczywiste, dlaczego ten zestaw został wycofany.
pavvv (2024-12-23 22:14:07+00:00): W terenie nic nie wskazuje na to, żeby tu był jakiś zakaz.
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 17:44:44+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160404670
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 17:41:25+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160404560
John Hanover (2024-12-19 07:03:08+00:00): I've been meaning to work on this for some time but was previously intimidated by the complexity of the issue. Mappers over the years had added a complex and confusing network of braided trails, switchback cuts, and game trails that cluttered the map and distracted from the actual maintained trails in the area. This rendered the map almost unusable for navigation in the front range. 

While working on this changeset I tried to keep informal or social trails that accessed a specific point while deleting redundant trails, as well as disconnected or "floating" trails that were not connected to any network but simply added where a game trail crossed a meadow. I also replaced the highway tag on some bypassed alignments of rerouted trails with disused:highway, to prevent them from rendering on the map, as these trails are generally closed by the state park to prevent erosion.

If anyone thinks I deleted something important please feel free to comment on the changeset or shoot me a message. This is a difficult trail system to work on, but I felt something had to be done.

Regards, 
John
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 17:40:03+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160404517
mweper (2024-12-20 00:04:52+00:00): Por favor, revisar ya que en mapas oficiales figura como de doble sentido.

https://infomapa.rosario.gov.ar/emapa/mapa.htm
Gangadi Anusha (2024-12-22 04:29:44+00:00): Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I reverted the changes. Please feel free to point out similar mistakes in future
   Thank you
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 17:40:04+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160404517
Joseph R P (2024-12-23 02:09:20+00:00): Hello, GeographRick, per the guidelines for the classification of motorways in the US (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance#Motorway), these small stretches of highway with grade separations which you have upgraded to motorways should not be tagged as such. A disconnected motorway should be at least a couple miles long and have multiple interchanges rather than just one, per the page I linked. Examples of correctly-tagged isolated motorways would be the Kokomo, IN bypass and the Wilmington, OH bypass.
Joseph R P (2024-12-23 02:13:49+00:00): One more note—please consider using more descriptive changeset comments to explain what you're doing in your edits so that it is clearer from a glance which kind of edits you are making. Thanks!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:29:48+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659769
Kovirii (2025-06-06 13:05:29+00:00): For some reason this changeset left a bunch of disembodied points along but path of path "1896"
ratrun (2025-06-06 13:49:04+00:00): Can you please better describe what you mean with "path of path "1896"", I have no idea what you mean by that.
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 17:25:25+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160404046
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
pavvv (2024-12-19 07:31:48+00:00): Może i się zgodziła, ale proszę zaczekać do zakończenia dyskusji na forum dot. stosowania highway=trunk i nie wprowadzać nieprzedyskutowanych zmian.
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 17:25:26+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160404046
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 17:13:10+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160403585
Larmax (2025-01-04 11:39:52+00:00): Eikö rakennuksen nimi olekaan Pulssi?
jussielo (2025-01-21 07:39:40+00:00): Kai talon nimi voi olla Pulssi, mutta osoitehaku antoi kaksi erillistä osoitetta Terveystalolle.
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 17:13:11+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160403585
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 17:10:09+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160403467
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 17:10:10+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160403467
Glassman (2025-01-05 23:37:45+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

I see you changed the name in a subsequent edit. Thanks.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160380592
vtrtsxlegend (2024-12-20 15:47:19+00:00): Hi Baloo Uriza, thank you for making us aware of placement tags. We will make sure to take them into account in future edits to prevent similar situations that caused you to revert the changeset.
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 16:41:47+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160402462
Supaplex (2024-12-19 11:24:44+00:00): 東海國小已經有繪製了，重覆添加
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245594605
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160380969
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 16:41:48+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160402462
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 16:36:23+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160402223
infeeeee (2024-12-20 11:05:01+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Az 	Őszirózsa utcán azt akartad jelölni, hogy biciklire nem vonatkozik az egyirányú közlekedés?
Ha igen, ennek a megfelelő címkéje a oneway:bicycle=no, iD szerkesztőben magyarul ez "Egyirányú (kerékpárral)" névre hallgat. A hozzáadott bicycle=yes csak annyit jelent, hogy szabad biciklivel közlekedni az utcán.

Az utcán szerepel egy kivéve célforgalom címke is. Aktuális ez még, kint van a tábla? Mert ha igen, akkor az a tábla vonatkozik biciklisekre is, hiába nem szokták betartani, a kresz ezt írja.

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
MrBrown987 (2024-12-20 18:56:15+00:00): Szia!

Köszönöm az észrevételeket, javítottam.
infeeeee (2024-12-21 00:21:00+00:00): Elég lett volna az összes korlátozó címkét leszedni, ha nincs semmi, akkor az azt jelenti bárki bemehet, javítottam itt: https://osm.org/changeset/160454152

Másik: Jól látom az egyik fotón, hogy a Diósdi út felül készült egy balra kanyarodó külön sáv? Budapest felől pedig továbbra is kétsávos a Balatoni út?
MrBrown987 (2024-12-21 10:35:49+00:00): Igen, a Diósdi út felől van egy balra kanyarodó sáv a Fürdő utcára. A másik irányból csak egysávos a Balatoni út.
infeeeee (2024-12-22 11:53:14+00:00): Sávokat hozzáadtam itt: https://osm.org/changeset/160498699

Köszi a közreműködést!
NeisBot (2024-12-19 08:18:37+00:00): Hi NicolasBirego9, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 83% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 98 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=160381989
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-23 08:12:29+00:00): Looks like some contributors added buildings, while others decided to play 'build and remove' later ...
literan (2024-12-19 20:10:14+00:00): тротуар это пешеходная дорога, примыкающая к проезжей части. Не стоит ставить теги тротуара (footway=sidewalk) на дорожки, не являющиеся тротуарами.

например, по тротуарам по ПДД запрещено ездить на велосипеде
kartler175 (2024-12-20 13:01:45+00:00): Please look at https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=5.75558&lat=50.47892&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 16:10:24+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160401221
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 16:10:25+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160401221
aTarom (2024-12-19 08:49:33+00:00): Hola, se esta importando una etiqueta incorrecta:
"bicicle"
es
"bicycle"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle
Podéis corregirlo?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40716576/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/137816659/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291003992/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429266717/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/482706712/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/482706713/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/665345151/history
Raquel-garcia-import (2024-12-19 10:29:28+00:00): Disculpa ahora mismo corrijo ese erro. Muchas gracias por avisar !
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
habi (2024-12-19 08:33:37+00:00): Hier wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136481483, nicht 136481413 :)
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 16:10:26+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160401221
infeeeee (2024-12-20 10:51:04+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

A species:wikidata címkét, illetve az állatok különböző nyelvű neveit (name:cs a cseh nyelvű név) is ilyenkor frissíteni kéne, mert így most ellentmondanak ezek egymásnak.

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:02:37+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165094884
syntex (2024-12-19 21:21:31+00:00): Dlaczego skasowałeś poprawną nazwę geograficzną?
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 15:55:40+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160400675
qugeb (2024-12-19 14:57:18+00:00): Hier wird jetzt allen Nutzern ein Bauernhof mit dem Namen Test angezeigt. Wenn du uns verrätst was du genau vorhast können wir dir eventuell helfen oder ein paar Tipps geben. Den Test-Punkt solltest du bitte wieder entfernen.
Kolesokryhle (2024-12-19 15:11:45+00:00): I'll take care of deleting the point
Bart- (2024-12-19 15:25:04+00:00): Check this out, this is a development server. https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/51.06823/10.85226
Kolesokryhle (2024-12-19 15:28:35+00:00): Thanks for the link - I will definitely watch it.
Jofban (2024-12-23 17:56:33+00:00): Hi, wie ich sehe hast du die alte Straßenbahnstrecke von Offenbach eingezeichnet. Tolle Arbeit!
Das Problem damit ist an der Stelle, dass viele der Gleise gar nicht mehr vorhanden sind (Bieberer Straße/Mathildenplatz/OVB). So sieht es z.B. aus als ob die Strecke durch das Busdepot führt, was sie ja gar nicht tut.
Am Besten wär es, du schaust mal bei openhistoricalmap.org vorbei und trägst sie dort ein. Mit Start- und Enddatum kann man sich dann auch die Ausdehnung im Laufe der Zeit ansehen!
Danke für dein Engagement und antworte gerne, damit wir ins Gespräch kommen können.
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 15:27:56+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160399609
Lejun (2025-09-30 08:52:53+00:00): Salut, est-ce qu’il y a une raison particulière pour avoir passé le path en track ? J’avais pour idée que les voies vertes sont automatiquement du path puisque fermées à la circulation automobile (sauf riverains, etc)
Alain 9-0 (2025-09-30 10:29:57+00:00): Salut. Un path est pour moi un sentier, trop étroit pour être carrossable (cf le Wiki "highway=path est utilisé pour indiquer un sentier générique, à usage multiple ou non spécifié, trop étroite pour le passage d'un véhicule à 4 roues (motorisés ou non), indépendamment du type de revêtement au sol." 
Le Tracks est plus large, indépendamment des autorisations de circulation.
Et d'ailleurs dans ce cas, à l'image d'autres réalisations du même type (chemin du tram entre Héricourt et Couthenans) on pourrait même le taguer en Cycleway.
Lejun (2025-09-30 16:58:16+00:00): J'entends l'idée, t'es pas le seul à le voir de cette manière, et ultimement je m'en cogne de comment c'est renseigné tant que ça l'est de manière homogène. Or le wiki indique bien qu'une voie verte est à indiquer en path plutot que track. Le chemin du tram n'y fait pas exception d'ailleurs, et pour sûr cycleway n'est pas adapté puisque privilégié aux pistes cyclables même (c'est à dire à usage exclusif de cyclistes).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:traffic_sign%3DFR:C115
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dpath#Exemples
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Voie_verte
nurdafur (2025-04-28 11:16:57+00:00): Hallo Schlumpfhasenbär
Ich bin zufällig über dieses Changeset gestolpert. Hier hast du am Hellweg zwischen Homberg und Wingeshausen lanes=0 eingetragen. Das ist kein gültiger Wert. Anhand des Luftbildes vermute ich, dass es eher lanes=2 und lane_markings=no sein sollte.
Vielleicht magst du das nochmals anschauen.
Liebe Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Kartografieren 
Urs
Schlumpfhasenbär (2025-04-28 11:30:03+00:00): Hi, :-)
Ich war das zwar nicht, aber ich habe grad mal 2 Fahrspuren draus gemacht... Grüße!
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 15:27:57+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160399609
eggie (2024-12-19 09:24:42+00:00): Dag Ferd. Hier is iets niet helemaal goed gegaan met het gebouw links.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160383867

MVG
eggie
Ferd Sauter (2024-12-19 09:33:26+00:00): Goed dat je het ziet, ik had het landhuis per ongeluk toegekend aan een hoekpunt en dat per ongeluk verschoven, ik heb het nu gefixt.
Ferd Sauter (2024-12-19 09:33:54+00:00): Ik hoop dat het zo goed is, ik ben niet erg ervaren hier.
eggie (2024-12-19 09:54:04+00:00): Ferd.. Alle begin is moeilijk... en OSM heeft een scherpe leercurve. Ik zal je onze welkomstmail sturen, want die heb je kennelijk nooit gehad. Bij deze Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-19 09:11:00+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12432954651

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-18 00:26:12+00:00): Removed remaining Google Maps-derived, outdated SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184249618

https://osm.org/changeset/184249618
qugeb (2024-12-19 14:59:22+00:00): Auch diesen Test-Punkt solltest du besser wieder entfernen. Wenn du Fragen zu OSM oder OSMand hast melde dich gerne. 
Kann es sein, dass du nur eine lokale/private Markierung haben wolltest?
eggie (2024-12-19 09:28:20+00:00): Dag Ferd.. Je pad links zit geplakt aan de landuse en volgt niet de juiste loop. 
Het pad rechts naar het Gemeentehuis heb je op slot gezet met access=no Voor wie?
Is dat Verboden Toegang?

MVG
eggie
Ferd Sauter (2024-12-19 10:06:30+00:00): Pad links: Ik kan niet goed de loop vinden op de satellietfoto, het loopt evenwijdig aan de Aa, volgens mij klopt het redelijk, maar ik heb geen GPS-data.
Ferd Sauter (2024-12-19 10:07:20+00:00): Pad rechts: access alleen voor voetgangers en fietsers, ik ben er niet zeker van of auto's daar in mogen.
eggie (2024-12-19 10:12:41+00:00): Oke...   Wanneer er geen auto's in mogen hoef je dat niet aan te geven. Dat is no per default.
Het lijkt wel of er een soort zij-ingang halverwege voor auto's is om op een binnenplaats te komen. Dan zou het eerste stuk een highway=service kunnen zijn. access=no heb ik vast verwijderd.
eggie (2024-12-19 10:20:06+00:00): Het paadje langs de Aa heb ik even aangepast met een recentere luchtfoto en de BGT transparant. Het zat bij de brug niet vast aan het fietspad. Nu wel.. 
Die PDOK latest is uit 2023 denk ik. 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160384463

Ik weet niet of er al een tussenverbinding gereed is naar het Stadhuisplein. 

Mapse verder,
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601