piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Robin Zyx (2024-08-03 09:26:25+00:00): Which is https://www.marineparkalliance.org/map/
IraGersh (2024-08-03 13:38:38+00:00): I did not know there was such a thing as an alliance. I did not know of the map. I made the change because when I opened up Organic Map it showed Marine Park where I expected to see White Island or Mau Mau Island. I was there once with an organization called HarborLab.
IraGersh (2024-08-03 13:39:13+00:00): So bottom line I agree with the map.
Robin Zyx (2024-08-03 20:24:49+00:00): I only discovered the alliance website because I googled for info to see which name you mentioned might be official, or less informal.
IraGersh (2024-08-03 20:34:40+00:00): i googled White Island on wikipedia and got the Mau Mau link.  I'd heard it called Mau Mau island before but White Island sounded more official so I went with that.
Robin Zyx (2024-08-03 22:01:05+00:00): I don't know if it made a difference to label placement but I also added a "place=island" to the polygon.
IraGersh (2024-08-03 23:24:05+00:00): Will find out tomorrow. Sounds like an improvement . I don't care where the label is. Only that it be something other than Marine Park
aharvey (2025-03-01 02:48:45+00:00): hi sorry but I have to disagree here, based on my April 2024 and December 2024 surveys there is a footpath around the turning circle. This is not present on the 2022 imagery, so recent. When you deleted this what source/evidence were you relying on?
aharvey (2025-03-01 02:50:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163074921
aharvey (2025-03-01 02:43:02+00:00): Thanks for improving this. Looks like you added the start in 2012 then I surveyed in 2020 and lost the track around the power line and had to bush bash out to Yanco Close, but I'd always wondered if there was a path to continue through somewhere.
toyotagps (2024-08-02 04:59:59+00:00): Здравствуйте. С какого перепуга эти улицы стали secondary?
map per (2024-08-03 06:56:16+00:00): Because of review_requested:

The building you added Gitarrenbauer - Lutz Hess and Hilber Restaurierung to is a maintenance building for a gas pipeline. Can it be that both places are actually in this house (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2959124171)?

Thanks and best regards
map per
map per (2024-08-13 19:16:20+00:00): Thanks for the follow up corrections! This looks good now.
eggie (2024-08-02 04:59:22+00:00): Hoi Gidon..

Super! 👍

Groet..
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 17:52:21+00:00): Hello!

You used
healthcare:speciality=pulmonology;
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12088332431/history

Have you maybe meant
healthcare:speciality=pulmonology
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
NK Whitla (2025-04-28 18:24:15+00:00): Hi,

I think you're referring to the semicolon (;) on the end, right? Yeah, that's not intentional and I'll remove it.

Thanks.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 18:32:51+00:00): > I think you're referring to the semicolon (;) on the end, right?

yes
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 11:10:32+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/975617986/history has via_ferrata_scale = B that was added in this edit
What via_ferrata_scale = B means? It is not listed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:via%20ferrata%20scale
mk2k22 (2025-12-18 11:22:36+00:00): Hi, I believe the lettering grade is commonly used in Slovenia and neighboring countries. You could probably also use the value 2 instead of B here.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-01 11:20:07+00:00): or a different key
Ksusha Zh (2024-08-02 05:42:30+00:00): @geo_ozon
puma515 (2024-08-03 10:22:08+00:00): Moin, es wäre schön wen man die  Namensinfo der Schleuse Klein Königsförde trotzdem irgentwie erhalten könnte. Das ist ein Historischer Canal, Schiffe Fahren dort schon seit 1890 nicht mehr. Der ort ist Heute nurnoch ein Baudenkmal.
Habe leider selber keine Ahnung von Kanal erfassung und auch nicht von Historischen objekten. 
Vieleicht hast du ne idee hier mal ein link vom Kreis von diesem ort: https://kulturwegweiser.kreis-rd.de/sehenswuerdigkeiten/details/poi/ansicht/poi/schleuse-klein-koenigsfoerde/
und ein Bild von Wikipedia:https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eider-Kanal#/media/Datei:Eiderkanalschleuse_2013a_03.jpg
geozeisig (2024-08-04 05:35:18+00:00): Da habe ich Verständnis für und den Namen wieder dran geschrieben. Das ist ja eine besondere Situation, die ich nicht erkannt hatte. Danke für den Hinweis.
yvecai (2024-08-03 05:16:17+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi avoir supprimé cette piste mappée en area=yes ? En version 4, j'imagine qu'elle était pas trop mal mappée, si ?
gscholz (2024-08-03 10:07:38+00:00): Hi yvecai,
thanks for your question, I have removed it, becaue it was not a valid relation. I have just reverted my changeset so you may like to fix this broken relation yourself?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16773043/history#map=15/45.5512/6.7309

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2024-08-06 05:58:29+00:00): Hi yvecai, 
this relation is still broken:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=6.72956&lat=45.54818&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
yvecai (2024-08-06 07:38:26+00:00): Ah, yes, I'll have a look this evening.
yvecai (2024-08-06 19:21:27+00:00): Done, wasn't that complicated, the two inner were member of another part of the piste that was probaly splitted in two sometime ago.
That being said,  when you have a warning from OSMI or whatever QA tool, it's better to try to fix instead of deleting just to get the warning away.
Frans S (2024-08-02 09:29:52+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------

C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.
Please collect a number of mappings before you upload your work. It limits the number of changesets on the database.
Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154719735
emersonveenstra (2024-08-06 11:36:01+00:00): Hi there,

Looks like you might have forgotten to add "mph" in the maxspeed:forward tags https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1267447404 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/727438603
GPS-GR (2024-08-12 10:44:33+00:00): Thanks.. emersonveenstra
I really appreciate your looking over my change set.. I'll add "mph' to the two sections you mentioned. I should get to that within next 24 hours.
Thanks again.. Happy trails and mapping on all your updates too. :)
GPS-GR (2024-08-12 19:07:53+00:00): Update: added "mph" to speed limit on both sections of Eastern Near 44th St.. It should be all set now. Thanks again.. emersonveenstra for spotting the missing speed units.
woodpeck (2024-08-02 07:35:37+00:00): Could you explain what the added value is in creating one-member multipolygons for these islands? What does #nng stand for?
woodpeck (2024-08-02 07:37:10+00:00): Ah right, I see NNG is the company you work for. But still... I think that this edit was unnecessary. What was the QA complaint?
woodpeck (2024-08-02 07:38:04+00:00): I see you're doing this a lot. Please pause multipoligonizing single-way islands until we have established why this is deemed necessary.
osminng (2024-08-02 07:51:44+00:00): Hello woodpeck,

The background is the consolidation of data. Already several one way element islands were already treated as relations (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/965894 ;https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/963182 ; https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/543205).
Rémi_ (2024-08-05 00:21:38+00:00): Bonsoir
J'ai supprimé le nœud "domicile" qui constitue une information personnelle.
rskedgell (2024-08-02 09:16:02+00:00): I'm absolutely certain that it isn't. The exception plate on the no entry sign says "except buses". The wider category of PSVs is not allowed.
pitscheplatsch (2024-08-02 12:09:01+00:00): Should be reviewed by the local community. Thanks!
PKOLSmountdouglas (2024-08-03 06:26:52+00:00): The revisions as suggested correct, confirmed by the District of Saanich. Please refer to the link provided above (District of Saanich). This map shows all and ONLY the official trails. Each of these trails has a name.

As noted, this park has a special municipal designation as a natural park with many special fragile ecological areas that need protection. These ecosystems are critically (provincially, federally, and globally) imperilled and provide critical habitat for species protected under the federal Species At Risk act.

The ecological integrity of this park is seriously threatened by park visitors creating and using their own informal trails. This has lead to significant, documented ecological damage and is hindering ongoing restoration by municipal staff and volunteers.
ManuelB701 (2024-08-02 10:19:47+00:00): Dafür aber ist er mit dem Bürgersteig verbunden und solche virtuelle Wege würde ich nicht unbedingt eintragen, außer es handelt es sich an der Stelle um eine offizielle Querung (z.B. niedrige Bordsteine), dort wird häufig gekreuzt oder führt in einem Radweg von der Fahrbahn aus.
dr_chain (2025-04-08 15:49:43+00:00): genau das ist dort der Fall: abgesenkter Zugang von der Fahrbahn aus. Jetzt wird dort auch ordentlich durchgeroutet.. Grüße
GerdP (2024-08-04 16:59:07+00:00): Habe ich Dich mit meinen Tipps verschreckt?
Ich habe den entsprechenden Knoten jetzt mal ins Netz mit aufgenommen.
user_21721894 (2024-08-04 17:09:39+00:00): Nein alles ok. 😄😄
Bin aber gerade etwas zeitlich eingeschränkt gewesen dieses Wochenende. Und ab morgen fahre ich für eine Woche in den Urlaub.
GerdP (2024-08-04 17:13:28+00:00): Prima. Dann wünsche ich viel Spaß!
user_21721894 (2024-08-12 14:59:37+00:00): Moin
So nun ist der Urlaub auch schon wieder Geschichte.
Ich habe mich heute mal wieder rangesetzt und die Karte mit Knotenpunkt 38, 54 und 33 versehen. Ich hoffe das ich es jetzt so richtig gemacht habe nach deinen Tip. Habe sie als discription=Knotenpunkt 38 z.B gesetzt. 
Natürlich sind an diesen Schilder jede Menge Wegweiser. Aber da traue ich mich noch nicht so richtig ran. 
VG Jürgen
GerdP (2024-08-12 15:46:00+00:00): Die Frage ist halt, ob Du nur mir mitteilen willst, welche Knotenpunkte ausgeschildert sind oder ober es auch maschinelle Auswerter verstehen sollen. Für Letzteres braucht man deutlich mehr. Hier mal ein Link in das entsprechende wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:rcn_ref
jmarchon (2024-08-03 01:21:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-06 23:13:36+00:00): That's definitely not a road. reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154912737
BC168 (2024-08-03 02:49:02+00:00): Bitte die Syntax für opening_hours beachten.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 04:01:49+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164574024
pitscheplatsch (2024-08-03 15:54:14+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154649682
adamsc (2024-08-02 14:45:38+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tej zmiany? To jest droga polna służąca do dojazdu do pól. Ruch do Radzikowa i Radzików - Błonie się tędy nie odbywa.
michsred (2024-08-03 10:39:24+00:00): Źródłem jest przejazd rowerem po tej drodze w dniu wprowadzenia zmiany. Szerokość drogi, nawierzchnia i jej dostępność nie różni się niczym od drogi Radzików IHAR - Łaźniew Majątek (droga również przejechana tego dnia).
adamsc (2024-08-03 17:05:15+00:00): Obie powinny być trackami. Dojazd do tych wsi odbywa się innymi utwardzonymi drogami. To są polne drogi, gdzie czasami ktoś przejedzie skrótem.

Za wiki: "highway=unclassified- Najniższa kategoria dróg tranzytowych. Łączą wioski i osiedla. Mogą być spotykane w miastach jako uzupełniające w stosunku do highway=tertiary. Chociaż często jest utwardzona, może być nieutwardzona, np. gdy jest dobrze utrzymaną główna drogą dojazdu do wsi. Zazwyczaj posiadają klasę L lub D (dojazdowe)" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:highway
StC (2024-10-12 15:14:59+00:00): Hi,

there seems to be a topic for discussion with this changeset. Here in France the outdoors community is trying to find a consensus on how to map parent and child relations in large routes, and some are adamant that there should be no name in child relations.  I suppose that it makes it easier for rendering to have the same name on parent and child relations, but it is not always possible (when there is one child and several parents). The solution used by Waymarkedtrails for rendering symbols is interesting (ignore the tags on children when they have the same network tag as the parent). Would it be OK with you to find a suitable forum (maybe community.openstreetmap.org) to discuss possible conventions between apps and contributors?

Cheers,

St.
vojtechzaboril (2024-10-12 15:23:36+00:00): Hi, 
the trick you described (use tags from parant instead of children) looks good, if it is necessary, we will adopt it if absolutely necessary. But I think that adding the name to childs is generally not a problem. If there is a consensus on that in France, I will respect it.
Unfortunately, we dont’t have time for joining forums or discussions, so we will respect the best practice.

Regards
StC (2024-10-14 12:02:32+00:00): Hi,

unfortunately there is no best practice that I'm aware of; it's difficult to stabilize one among mappers when their favorite apps have such different behaviours.

What intrigues me in your reply is that you treat "use tags from parent instead of children" as a new idea, whereas I was convinced that this is what you already do. Am I interpreting things wrong?

Cheers,

St.
vojtechzaboril (2024-10-14 12:08:28+00:00): I meant to use the parent relation for rendering instead of using the child relations.
So missing names in child relations will be no problem.
Sorry if it wasnt clear in previous message.
V
StC (2024-10-14 15:38:18+00:00): It's the topic that's difficult to communicate about, not you who are unclear (not more than me at least!). My perception is that currently your outdoors rendering ignores the names of child relations when they exist. I cannot paste images here, but I everywhere I look the child's name is ignored and the parent's name is used (and that looks good!)
vojtechzaboril (2024-10-14 15:49:38+00:00): Hi, I will try to explain that correctly.
Currently our (mapy.cz) renderer ignores the 'superroute' (or the parent relations, as mentioned in previous messages), so only the child routes are rendered, so only the ref (16 in this (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1128459/history) case) were shown in our map.

So I copied the name from parent relation to child relations to 'fix' this issue as the names of 'simple' relations are rendered on our map.

You proposed, that using (by the renderer) only the parent relation (and ignoring the child relations) will solve this problem in better way (no need to copy name from parent to child -> no need of editing at all). We will try adopt this way of processing those relations.

Hope I explained it well. If not (and if you are still interested in this discussion), ask me.
eggie (2024-08-02 09:11:37+00:00): Dag Lies Boer,

Realiseer je dat het hier niet meer routeert voor hulp- en bezorgdiensten. 
art 461 is niet zo zwartwit. Je kunt hier beter access=permissive taggen.
We zijn wat behoudender geworden met alles op private te zetten. 
De postbode kan er dan ook komen.
Het probleem zal wel de basisschool zijn, waardoor de parkeerplaats steeds vol is op een ouderavond. 
Dan vraagt men een art 461 wvs aan.

Groet
eggie
_Lies Boer (2024-08-02 10:51:01+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Oke, duidelijk. Ik pas hem aan!
Mathias_ADAV (2024-08-23 13:24:28+00:00): Bonjour, je me suis permis de modifier votre contribution concernant les chemins piéton vélo ouverts aux agriculteurs. En effet, ces chemins ont un statut particulier mais correspondent dans leur usage et par la signalétique du panneau B7b présent à un highway = path et plutot qu'à un highway = track.
Andrea Musuruane (2024-08-02 15:11:09+00:00): Io qui non non vedo alcun semaforo: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=188214590346211
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154724661
Gregory Peony (2024-10-28 18:01:20+00:00): The changeset comment you have provided is missleading. It mentions mapping buildings but you mapped highways. This can make changesets more cumbersome to work with for other mappers. Please check that the default comment is appropriate before you upload your changes. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154724725
alexnder (2024-08-06 08:31:30+00:00): Nu se pune `brand=Turism`  pt ca "Turism" nu e un brand. Corect ar fi, de ex. "brand=Hilton"
Firefishy (2024-08-02 12:58:23+00:00): Nice additions! Thank you. Another great editing app is https://every-door.app/ or https://streetcomplete.app/
SomeoneElse (2024-08-02 09:42:57+00:00): Also the A14 and M1 to Derby, and bus stops in Derby
Frans S (2024-08-02 09:12:35+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
However, Most buildings are not squared. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key when the building is still selected.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154725484
Frans S (2024-08-02 09:23:18+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154725543
eggie (2024-08-02 09:05:42+00:00): Dag Lies Boer,

tunnel=yes is hier niet correct, want er is al een viaduct. Om de problemen met de rendering op te lossen kun je beter covered=yes gebruiken. layer=-1 hoeft niet, wanthet viaduct staat op layer=1

MVG
eggie
_Lies Boer (2024-08-02 10:32:44+00:00): Ah duidelijk! Ik pas hem aan :)
mcliquid (2024-08-02 11:25:11+00:00): Ich hab das conditional korrigiert, das war falsch.
-2147483648 (2024-08-02 12:45:47+00:00): Wieso war es falsch? Bist du sicher dass die neue Version stimmt? Müsste zwischen der ersten Zeitspanne und Sa,Su,PH nicht ein ; sein und Apr-Nov wiederholt?
mcliquid (2024-08-02 15:06:40+00:00): "access:motor_vehicle:conditional" gibt es als Schlüssel schon mal gar nicht. Entweder "access:conditional" oder "motor_vehicle:conditional". Siehe dazu auch im Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions
In dem Fall hier betrifft es nur Kraftfahrzeuge, also "motor_vehicle:conditional".

Hier kannst du dir deine Angabe anschauen: https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=(Apr-Nov)%20AND%20(Mo-Fr%2000%3A00-06%3A00%2C11%3A30-23%3A59%3B%20Sa%3B%20So%3B%20PH)&lat=47.3774097&lon=9.5387008&mode=0&DATE=1711965600000
mcliquid (2024-08-02 15:09:19+00:00): Du hattest Recht damit dass Apr-Nov zwei Mal vorkommen muss, damit die Regel im März nicht gilt. Das wäre meine Korrektur: https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=Apr-Nov%20Mo-Fr%2011%3A30-06%3A00%2C%20Apr-Nov%20Sa%2CSu%2CPH%2000%3A00-24%3A00&lat=47.3774097&lon=9.5387008&mode=0&DATE=1711965600000

Ob mit Komma oder mit Semikolon macht aus meiner Sicht keinen Unterschied, zumindest im Evaluation Tool oder bei YoHours. Aber ich habe es mit ; abgeändert. Schönes Wochenende!
-2147483648 (2024-08-02 15:20:43+00:00): Wenn du die Conditional_restrictions-Seite genau liest ist die Benutzung von access: nur nicht empfohlen.
Aber danke für die Korrektur, ohne access: entspricht es der Empfehlung im Wiki.

Die opening_hours-Syntax bezieht sich gem. Wiki nur auf Zeitangaben.
:conditional unterstützt aber eine erweiterte Syntax (z.B. AND), die bei opening_hours nicht erlaubt ist.
-2147483648 (2024-08-02 15:22:18+00:00): Deine Korrektur hat noch das Problem dass die Beschränkung am Montag vor 6 Uhr nicht richtig verarbeitet wird.

Wünsche ebenfalls ein schönes Wochenende.
Frans S (2024-08-02 09:22:18+00:00): Hello.  Why do you upload every single building you map?  Please wait till you have a number of buildings mapped, or when the task is complete mapped or when you want to stop.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154725983
Frans S (2024-08-02 10:41:42+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please follow the guidelines of this wiki how to tag highways.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India/Tags/Highway
Many roads in between farmland should be tagged as track. There is no need to map all of those tracks, 
Focus on tracks connecting houses, settlements etc.
Best regards
H2172 (2024-08-02 09:23:07+00:00): "Please note this location no longer takes touring caravans or motorhomes, and is now purely a wedding venue."
Luzandro (2024-08-02 12:28:52+00:00): Hallo Karl,

welches Gebäude soll sonst das Jagdschloss sein, bzw. was soll das hier ansonsten sein? Das sieht doch sehr nach den Fotos im Wikipedia-Artikel aus, mit Säuleneingang und passenden Winkeln/Türmen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154726966
Karl Gruber (2024-08-02 12:41:52+00:00): Du wirst recht haben, sorry, obwohl ich dort oftmals vorbeifahre, kenne ich nur die Gebäude bei der Einfahrt und das Jagdhaus am Rand, da das Gelände ja nicht zugängig ist. es gibt ja leider auch keine neueren Fotos
wermak (2025-02-06 06:09:05+00:00): Warum sollte dieses Restaurant geschlossen sein?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/582268498/history
https://bistro-amici.de
keepright! ler (2025-02-06 09:42:04+00:00): Zum Zeitpunkt meines Changesets war die Website offline und auf speisekarte.menu hieß es: »Dieses Restaurant ist dauerhaft geschlossen.«

Inzwischen ist die Website wieder online und das Restaurant in Betrieb – danke für die Korrektur!