piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aceman444 (2023-10-17 22:23:17+00:00): Zdravim, naco boli potrebne tieto zmeny? Na cesty normalne cyklisti aj chodci mozu, tak aku informaciu pridava foot=yes a bicycle=yes? A pridali ste povolenie pre bicykle aj na cestach, kde je vehicle=private, cize vsetky vozidla vratane bicyklov tam smu len s povolenim vlastnika. Podla akej dopravnej znacky tam bicykle smu ist?
aceman444 (2023-10-18 21:39:59+00:00): No bol som to pozriet, a nie je tam zakaz pre vesetky vozidla, ale len motorove. Takze bicykle tam mozu.
Cize Vas zamer bol dobry, ale zrejme ste tam neboli a vyriesili ste to v OSM nespravnym sposobom, neumoznili ste vjazd aj inym nemotorovym vozidlam. Opravil som. Ale nabuduce davajte vacsi pozor.
Fuzzillogic (2023-09-29 23:56:05+00:00): Het voetpad langs de (afgesloten) Hulsmaatstraat is ter plaatse met borden expliciet opgesplitst in een voet- en fietspad. Nu is het een generiek "path" geworden, met access all. Gaat navigatiesoftware daar goed mee om?
eggie (2023-09-27 21:29:41+00:00): Oke.. Je verandert nu de tagging van de voorgaande mapper. Die had het overigens juist correct gedaan.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141837653

Zoals Lachgast tag ik ook zebra's.
Alleen de zoektocht door de wiki is lastig en editor iD doet vaak andere voorstellen als internationale editor.
Het zal er wel mee te maken hebben dat het wiel steeds opnieuw wordt uitgevonden.

Zie hier de wiki over crossing_ref  Die tag heb je verwijderd.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing_ref%3Dzebra

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-27 21:32:30+00:00): ... en hier komt dat crossing:markings vandaan
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:markings

Dus hoe de zebra er uit ziet; 
rainbow, oranj wk zebra's e.d.
eggie (2023-09-27 21:34:19+00:00): De zebra heb ik hersteld.. :)
doerakpoes (2023-09-27 23:59:37+00:00): Ik ben verward over 
crossing:markings=zebra vs crossing_ref=zebra
hoe geeft crossing_ref=zebra extra/nieuwe info als crossing:markings=zebra er al staat?

P.S.
ik had aangenomen dat crossing_ref=zebra een outdated tag was omdat het minder specifiek leek te zijn zonder sub-keys; volgens de wiki lijkt het dat je crossing_ref zelfs hoort te gebruiken
eggie (2023-09-28 07:11:08+00:00): OSM is vooal rijstebrij in het begin.
Dat gaat vanzelf over als je meer bekend raakt met de mogelijkheden.
Soms zijn er meer wegen naar Rome.
Neus maar eens rond op het forum.
Groet..
eggie
doerakpoes (2023-09-28 14:02:24+00:00): 👍
Langlaeufer (2023-09-28 10:44:06+00:00): Fußweg und Radweg an der Löwenberger Str. sind neu in 2023?
klnkengi (2023-09-28 17:33:00+00:00): Ja. zumindest sahen der Asphalt bzw. innerorts das Pflaster ziemlich neu aus, als ich dort im August entlanggefahren bin. Schilder, die den Weg als Radweg ausweisen, gibt es übrigens noch keine, aber vielleicht werden die noch ergänzt.
Langlaeufer (2023-09-28 17:46:35+00:00): Danke dir. Hast du bicycle=use_sidepath dann noch weggelassen?
klnkengi (2023-09-28 18:01:16+00:00): Genau, ich habe deswegen nur bicycle=yes und nicht =designated verwendet und an der Straße kein bicycle=use_sidepath gesetzt.
citrula (2023-09-27 22:20:11+00:00): Hi Pilartes-Congo, you might want to consider adding a leisure=sports_centre area surrounding the pickleball facilities and add the name to that instead. You can read about it on the wiki here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dsports_centre

Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141837896
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-27 20:50:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10751026685

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
borishag (2024-06-19 08:05:34+00:00): Hallo,

Je hebt een vestiging van Kruidvat ten onrechte verwijderd! Deze inmiddels hersteld.
pkoby (2024-02-28 20:20:17+00:00): Hi schloss,

I'm from Kent, OH originally, so I was browsing the map over there and saw your work. I noticed that you added a lot of `landuse=grass` to the city, but the granularity of it seems quite low, so you've covered large areas including highways, parking areas, and other features that aren't actually grass.

I asked for some opinions on the OSM US Slack (I didn't find you on there), and the consensus was that said grass data is too inaccurate. I was wondering if you were interested in improving the mapping of actual grass areas, otherwise I was looking to revert some of those additions that do not reflect the real-world situation. I did not want to unilaterally remove the data without reaching out to you first. Please let me know your thoughts on how best to proceed.

Thanks!
Pkoby
pkoby (2024-02-28 20:20:49+00:00): Link to discussion if you're signed up: https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C029HV951/p1706748422808479
schloss (2024-02-29 13:40:30+00:00): Hey, I am interested in improving this if it’s incorrect. Happy to do this at a more granular level when time allows. Also please modify any changes I’ve made as you see fit! Thanks for reaching out.
jtracey (2023-09-27 21:50:46+00:00): Reverts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141834154
Berlin53 (2023-12-26 11:36:54+00:00): Kannst du die Quelle für die geplanten Straßen im Entwicklungsgebiet Segelfliegerdamm nennen. Danke
Berlin53
bxl-forever (2023-09-29 19:02:57+00:00): Duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11108241805

Reverted.  Please update your map data before assuming something is missing.
keithonearth (2023-09-29 06:06:12+00:00): I did record my route on my phone's gps twice when riding on this path, but the resulting gpx files were pretty inaccurate, so I disregarded them when adding the path, for the most part. The cycleway's accuracy could be improved when imagery becomes available, or someone else wants to try to get a better gps trace.
mbyte (2023-10-01 04:26:08+00:00): Hello Sonam
Why are you creating buildings over existing ones.
i2004 (2023-09-29 09:33:04+00:00): te hcie el ramal saadera del 60 y algunas paradas de avenida montes de oca
❤️‍🔥 (2023-09-28 05:17:28+00:00): hey if you want to include a portion of the stream beyond the coastline you can map it as `waterway=tidal_channel` - see https://osm.org/way/987561246 for a local example and https://osm.wiki/Tag:waterway=tidal_channel for the docs
csimeona22 (2023-09-28 18:00:07+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta.
Warin61 (2023-10-07 04:57:54+00:00): Hi
Relation 16389568 deleted. building=yes;roof needed to be separated into one OSM entry for building=yes (I changed this to retail) and a separate building=roof with layer=1. 

The guide is 'one feature = one OSM entry'.
silversurfer83 (2023-09-28 12:56:00+00:00): double entry reomoved in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141863436
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141843061
Glassman (2023-09-28 15:32:32+00:00): Did you notice that the entire golf course is already tagged as the Rolling Hills Golf Course? You might want to remove your node or change it to what is in the building.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-10-05 22:58:56+00:00): Hi Quan, please recheck since "to" not properly connected to "via"
citrula (2023-09-28 02:57:52+00:00): Hi wesnovak, your crossing nodes dont seem to be attached to the highway or sidewalk ways. Please read the wiki on highway=crossing tag for more information. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing#How_to_map

I'm also happy to help answer any questions you have. Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141843882
Baloo Uriza (2023-09-28 16:26:08+00:00): Might want to check your editor for a square up or ortogonalize feature to help draw right angles.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141843886
scootern (2023-10-04 05:21:17+00:00): Updated from council asset street layer
limes11 (2023-09-28 10:29:03+00:00): Haha danke. Hervorragend, auf einen Tippfehler hinweisen und dabei einen zweiten hinzufügen ;)

Dabei passt Wiesent viel besser, die leben doch auf der Wiese, oder?
pitfire (2023-09-28 11:17:58+00:00): Jau, mein Humor  :-)
VG
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-28 04:20:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1211494069

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2023-09-28 10:19:41+00:00): Hoi,

De bollard geeft een foutmelding omdat je nogmaals een lijnelement erover heen legt met barrier=bollard.
Dat is dan dubbelop.
Die rijtjes met palen worden zo niet gemapt (ondanks de wiki)
Het paaltje verbonden met de rijbaan zal het werk doen.
Ipv het lijnelement zou je evt nog aparte bollard neer kunnen zetten, maar dat zal ook wel een foutmelding opleveren.
Paaltjes horen verbonden te zijn met een weg.
Denk dat het lijnelement weg kan.. Een muur was het daar zeker niet. 
Je edits 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141846022#map=19/52.65648/5.05402

Groet
eggie
doerakpoes (2023-09-28 14:06:21+00:00): losse bollard edit:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141866048
OddlyAngled (2023-09-28 14:58:52+00:00): did Canyon Express move? the prior way followed what I see in Bing as well as recent Strava data
brownieboss2 (2023-10-01 19:24:31+00:00): https://www.instagram.com/p/CxGvfADSbbR/ In the 6th and 7th picture, you can see that the new Canyon Express ends in a new location.
OddlyAngled (2023-10-01 19:33:56+00:00): ah, good to know. thanks!
ivss_xx (2023-11-07 01:57:39+00:00): Please note that for mapping indoor features, such as corridors, it's advised to use indoor=* tags. Here are simple tagging examples https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging
Langlaeufer (2023-09-28 09:40:00+00:00): service road seem to be a better choise
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141846524
Gan_toon (2023-09-29 17:14:52+00:00): Hi Langlaeufer

Thanks for the information and making the changes.
PengualaHeadphones (2023-09-28 05:29:20+00:00): It was named after former barangay captains of Hinukay.
Xvtn (2023-09-28 17:51:40+00:00): There was some discussion a while back regarding the use of "SR xx" vs "UT xx" - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3764072 by user keithalleman. Do you have any comments about reasoning one way or another?
Xvtn (2023-09-28 17:52:10+00:00): Oh, this was the note with discussion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3764067
literan (2023-10-06 20:44:02+00:00): layer дорожки по платформе метро должен быть тот же, что и самой платформы, т.е. в данном случае layer=-2

поправлю
karaga (2023-09-28 08:57:22+00:00): Hi, you have indicated here as source "European Environment Agency". We are not allowed to use this data in OSM because it is under CC-BY license, see here: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/legal-notice
arjunaraoc (2024-01-04 09:18:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my update: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145871122
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141847322
tastrax (2023-10-10 02:39:56+00:00): You have a road listed with a surface of asphalt - not sure that is correct
tastrax (2023-10-10 02:40:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1211506396/history#map=17/-40.76223/145.04366
tguen (2025-01-23 03:12:58+00:00): You've incorrectly tagged the hotel grounds as a building. Please fix.
karaga (2023-09-28 08:57:38+00:00): Hi, you have indicated here as source "European Environment Agency". We are not allowed to use this data in OSM because it is under CC-BY license, see here: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/legal-notice
user_17222985 (2023-11-27 08:58:33+00:00): where did you get the translation Arbuzinka ? 
This translation is incorrect because it was made according to the rules for Russia
There are separate rules for Ukraine and according to them there should be Arbuzynka
dadsada16 (2023-09-28 09:23:37+00:00): Das war ein missverständnis, den Shop gibts noch, er ist nur etwas anders als auf der karte
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-28 06:30:20+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527139926

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Hubert_Wu (2023-09-28 07:10:45+00:00): Jasne. Poprawione
ChehrehBargi (2023-09-28 06:34:21+00:00): کلمه اول توضیحات، اشتباه تایپی است.
Enock4seth (2023-09-28 13:46:08+00:00): one building per changeset is not a good way of contributing. 

Please stop using Esri World Imagery which is very out-of-date and use Bing Imagery.
cimm (2023-10-01 14:06:17+00:00): Hi Tangy Joy. Did you add the secondary link from the Geldenaaksevest to the Tiensesteenweg? If so, I assume you were using old satellite images? The Tiensepoort has been reworked recently and there is no right turn from the R23 to the Tiensesteenweg anymore. Can you please fix  that? Thank you!
Tangy_Joy (2023-10-04 12:49:52+00:00): Hi cimm,
As per JOSM available resources I created the secondary link between these two roads. It looks like you have a local knowledge and based on your input I have removed the link. Thank you for your valuable feedback. Happy Mapping 🙂
cimm (2023-10-04 13:11:42+00:00): Indeed, this is a recent change and the satellite images are outdated. Thank you for helping out! Happy mapping to you too.
Carto'Cité (2025-09-08 18:15:08+00:00): Bonjour Alexandre,
Sur cette voie verte tu as passé la valeur de la clé bicycle de designated à yes. C'est une erreur a priori et je voudrais t'expliquer pourquoi.
bicycle=yes dit effectivement que les cyclistes ont le droit d'utiliser la voie ; c'est utile essentiellement pour les voies où les cyclistes n'ont pas le droit par défaut (cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#France) ou c'est utile quand une restriction ou une interdiction générale est précisée (par exemple access=no ou access=destination) mais que cette restriction ne s'applique pas aux cyclistes.
bicycles=designated implique de fait bicycle=yes en termes de droits d'accès mais il ajoute une précision qui est que l'aménagement est explicitement fait pour (et pas uniquement pour) les cyclistes. C'est le cas des voies vertes.
N’hésite pas à me solliciter si tu as une remarque ou une question.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Langlaeufer (2023-09-28 09:28:29+00:00): Hallo ajoe,
Weist du, ob die im Norden anschließende Brücke mit Kfz befahrbar ist?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141849485
ajoe04 (2023-09-28 18:00:33+00:00): Also nicht für "normale" Kfz. Aber für Kfz der Forstverwaltung ist der ganze Sonnenweg z.B. mit mit dem Trecker befahrbar. Ist ein befestigter Waldweg und wird zum Abtransport z.B. von Bäumen genutzt. 
Wie tragfähig die Brücke ist kann ich nicht sagen, aber die sieht stabil aus.
Langlaeufer (2023-09-28 18:09:15+00:00): Die hattest du vergessen zu ändern. Deshalb habe ich nachgefragt. Grüße
user_5359 (2023-09-29 07:15:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys). Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org!
karaga (2023-09-28 08:57:53+00:00): Hi, you have indicated here as source "European Environment Agency". We are not allowed to use this data in OSM because it is under CC-BY license, see here: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/legal-notice
Harald Hartmann (2023-09-28 14:06:27+00:00): Hi karaga, i think we are allowed: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/European_Environment_Agency
karaga (2023-09-28 08:58:09+00:00): Hi, you have indicated here as source "European Environment Agency". We are not allowed to use this data in OSM because it is under CC-BY license, see here: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/legal-notice
*Martin* (2023-09-28 09:00:32+00:00): Hi. I will try to find a better source or revert my changes.
limes11 (2023-09-28 10:25:38+00:00): This is not so clear:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/European_Environment_Agency

This is from 2010 (!!)

In any case - if EEA is no legitimate source, this Wiki page must be adjusted as it is highly misleading.
Galbinus (2023-09-28 15:53:39+00:00): Hallo Martin, es ist sicherlich gut gemeint, naturräumliche Regionen wie "Central European Highlands" in OSM einzutragen. Aber zum einen bezweifele ich, dass es überhaupt eine ausreichend klare Abgrenzung gibt, die man in OSM abbilden kann, zum anderen halte ich region=* für komplett ungegeignet, um eine solche überregionale Zuordnung in OSM abzubilden. Für das, was Du da vorhast, ist meines Erachtens OSM schlichtweg nicht vorgesehen. Im deutschsprachigen OSM-Forum wurde dazu gerade eine Diskussion eröffnet, ich bitte Dich, daran teilzunehmen. Sonst sehe ich die große Gefahr, dass Du Dir noch weitere, mühevolle Arbeit hast und am Ende erleben musst, dass deine Arbeit letzten Endes wieder gelöscht wird. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/relation-uber-halb-europa/104316/5
*Martin* (2023-09-28 16:01:11+00:00): Hi Galbinus. I think that mountain ranges should be mapped in OSM. Many are mapped as a single node, which tells absolutely nothing about their shape or size. See discussion at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:natural%3Dmountain_range. I can remove the region tag and only keep natural=mountain_range. I also tagged ways with undocumented fuzzy=yes tag, but used around the world.
Olaf der Mapper (2023-09-28 16:03:03+00:00): Hi guys, please delete this f*cking stupid shit. The Neckar valley between Stuttgart and Esslingen is NOT part of the CE Highlands, while the higher situated Filder area isn't included here

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1211519816

This is absolute nonsense and doesn't fullfil OSM quality requirements.

bw Olaf
*Martin* (2023-09-28 16:07:10+00:00): Olaf, please be polite here, your language doesn't fulfill discussion guidelines.
Olaf der Mapper (2023-09-28 16:22:50+00:00): Dear Martin, from a topographical point of view, the data material used here is really absolute rubbish. Sorry that I cannot find any other appropriate term for this. I know our region here very well and I'm not sure If you're aware of what you've done here. The boundaries used here of the so labeled "Central European Highlands" are between grossly inaccurate and nonsense.

bw Olaf
*Martin* (2023-09-28 16:26:05+00:00): Olaf, I have removed it. If somebody has a better source then I think it should be mapped to OSM.
Olaf der Mapper (2023-09-28 16:35:35+00:00): Hey Martin, thank you for your understanding. I didn't want to offend you. It was just damn bad data mapped here.
houtari (2023-09-30 05:38:15+00:00): Hmm, jos alueelle ei pääse ilman lupaa niin eikö juuri access=permit ole oikein. Minulla on ainakin ollut tavoitteena muuttaa nuo tuohon muotoon. Asiaa on puitu mm. täällä https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/border-zone/94201 ja täällä https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Access=permit  / Markku
houtari (2023-09-30 05:39:59+00:00): Jonkinlainen linjaveto voisi olla hyvä ettei turhan muutella näitä edestakaisin.
Okahkonen (2023-09-30 14:25:43+00:00): Ihan totta. Tein muutoksen, kun olin havainnut että reitityspalvelut reitittävät jos on vain "permit". Tulee kalliiksi käyttäjille.
berndw (2023-09-30 08:30:30+00:00): Habe den Link zu den Öffnungszeiten korrigiert, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11199502829/history
gendy54 (2023-10-03 16:15:23+00:00): Bonjour,

Il serait utile de préciser les changements effectués. Digitalisation ne permet pas de savoir.

Voir: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Faites_de_bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Vinber-Pro (2023-11-12 17:11:57+00:00): salut,
c'est quoi Dewani comme activité ?
aTarom (2023-09-28 14:13:19+00:00): Hola David, gràcies per editar, s'ha eliminat la clau "name:ca"
a
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/79759955/history
no sé si reps els missatges, si hi ha qualsevol problema als canals de la comunitat esmentats en anteriors missatges podràs exposar si és que estàs en desacord, o lo mes probable un simple oblit, salutacions cordials
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-28 18:52:59+00:00): Have fun with overlays!

Another a bit missing setting is that you can enable and disable quests in settings :)
slackline (2023-09-28 22:46:52+00:00): Cheers, and thanks for another pointer. :D
NorthCrab (2023-09-28 12:14:45+00:00): This change broke the Uganda country relation
NorthCrab (2023-09-28 12:15:33+00:00): See geoposition:
0.6973775/34.3138291
0.7565206/34.3131848
NorthCrab (2023-09-28 12:16:33+00:00): Affected also: Kenya, Tororo, Eastern Region
GBAB (2023-12-09 13:10:20+00:00): Kedves SzPaula!
Honnan származik a Berény elnevezés?
Köszönettel:
Gábor
user_5359 (2023-09-29 06:22:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice we use for every type of ways the key highway (NOT Highway or path).
citrula (2023-09-28 20:05:25+00:00): Hello wesnovak, please use changeset comments when you are adding information to OSM - it helps other people understand what you are trying to do, and makes it easier to look at the history of objects. In this changeset, you appear to have added a way with no tags on it, as well as a few previous changesets.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141852893
pluton_od (2024-07-14 10:37:22+00:00): Відновив старі імена у зміні 142998159.
pluton_od (2024-07-14 10:36:17+00:00): Відновив старі імена у зміні 142998159.
fawkes2 (2023-09-28 08:52:40+00:00): Ebben a szerkesztésben van egy járda a bécsi körútnál ami nem kapcsolódik más vonalhoz és egy pont mellette ami nem vonal része és nincs rajta semmi tag. Szerintem ez véletlen lehet ebben a csomagban benne. 

A vespucciban van olyan funkció, hogy "törlés és jelenlegi nézet letöltése" amivel a korábbi fen nem töltött változásokat kitörli egy szerkesztés elött a program. Önmagában ha nem töltessz fel valamit akkor azt megjegyzi és a következő indításkor betölti. Ha ilyenkor csinálsz egy másik szerkesztést akkor ahhoz hozzáadódik a korábbi feltöltetlen változtatás (ha nem törlöd ki).
GBAB (2023-09-29 08:08:28+00:00): Igen, „az úgy volt”, hogy szerkesztettem egy kicsit, s közben egy másikunk is szerkesztett, s én csak őutána töltöttem fel a saját dolgaimat, amelyeket valójában előtte rajzoltam be, úgyhogy ilyen felemás lett a végeredmény. De ez egy alkalom, hogy kicsit javítsak rajta.
Kösz a figyelmeztetést!
fawkes2 (2023-09-29 09:15:29+00:00): Oh értem. Csak azt hittem valami korábbi próbálkozás véletlenül maradt benne.
Marek-M (2023-09-28 09:00:10+00:00): Cześć,
Takiego terenu budowy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1203044246 nie określamy nazwą 'Budynek wielorodzinny'. Tutaj prawidłowo otagowany obszar powinien mieć takie parametry:
landuse=construction
construction=residential

Wartość name można byłoby użyć dla określenia nazwy inwestycji nadanej przez dewelopera - np. 
name=Osiedle nad Jeziorem

Poprawiłem Twoją edycję: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141854374
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-10-15 10:44:10+00:00): This area has been updated and aerial imagery is outdated. Please check the the date of changes before breaking things. I'll revert this changeset.
Jakka (2023-09-28 15:33:03+00:00): c'est avec panneaux ? Manque des codes important
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cyclestreet