piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mapguru (2025-08-28 09:53:20+00:00): Darf ich dich mal was Fragen .
Bei mir wird wen ich was bearbeite im eingebetteten Editor keine Bildmaterial dargestellt , wie Bing Maps Luftbilder , oder Esri Weltbilder. Die Karte ist nur schwarz egal was ich für ein Bildmaterial auswähle . Es werden auch keine Gebäude Felder wie bei Josm oder Potlach angezeigt.
Vielleicht kannst mit da einen Rat geben an was das liegt ?

Danke!
theophrastos (2025-09-01 05:00:54+00:00): Sorry, mit ID kenne ich mich nicht aus. Allerdings steht in deinem Changeset, dass du Bing als Hintergrund verwendet hast. Die Uferlinie und die landuses habe ich nach deiner Beschreibung eingefügt.

MfG
mapguru (2025-09-01 06:17:57+00:00): Die Uferlinie passt so .
ja ich habe Bing benutzt aber die wurde die nicht angezeigt, die Karte war nur schwarz. Der Grund ist , mit Firefox funktioniert die Osm Bearbeitung nicht richtig. Hab dann mal mit Edge versucht und da funktioniert die Bing als Hintergrund.

mfg.
Supaplex (2026-02-09 05:25:07+00:00): Clean up the spam text in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178293753
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169273546
Syl (2025-07-22 08:34:43+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé ces modifications car elles se basent sur de vieilles images aériennes. La BD Ortho IGN date de 2022 alors que nous avons maintenant accès à l'Ortho Express 2025 dans le département.
J'ai au passage corrigé le zigzag avec ces nouvelles images.
StC (2025-07-23 08:51:05+00:00): Bonjour,

pourriez-vous svp mettre un peu plus d'informations dans vos commentaires de changeset ?

Celui-ci a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre, tout en introduisant une discontinuité étrange dans une voie nommée Boulevard Desaix. Je vais faire de mon mieux pour réparer.
geekbga2024 (2025-07-22 18:23:06+00:00): Modificación aceptada👍👍
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169273741
Facalderonm (2025-07-23 16:10:08+00:00): Hola. Tal como se ha comentado en otras ediciones ya revertidas, el consenso de la comunidad OSM en Colombia (ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Colombia/Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear o https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Colombia/Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear/nomenclatura_para_calles) es que las avenidas se nombre, con la etiqueta "name", usando la nomeclatura de la misma. El nombre oficial (como "Avenida Boyacá") se debe agregar con la etiqueta "official_name". Se procede a revertir los cambios.
Haeape1 (2025-07-23 16:23:30+00:00): Buenos dias, he visto la guía y tienes razón. Sin embargo, se podría saber si éste nombre se puede cambiar a oficial_name, ya que como en la guía lo dice, es un nombre oficial y no nombre alternativo. Gracias.
Facalderonm (2025-07-23 16:27:30+00:00): Hola, gracias por tu respuesta y por tomarlo con amabilidad. Estoy de acuerdo en que la etiqueta debería ser "official_name" y no "alt_name" en esta y otras avenidas de la ciudad. Con gusto puedes hacer esos cambios, yo trataré de ayudar también. Saludos.
Langlaeufer (2025-07-22 18:45:16+00:00): dann am besten highway=footway draus machen und auch segregated entfernen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169273800
Langlaeufer (2025-07-22 18:45:17+00:00): dann am besten highway=footway draus machen und auch segregated entfernen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169273800
Entbert (2025-07-22 11:48:57+00:00): Hallo Ethoz, wenn dein Changeset ausschließlich aus Löschungen besteht, wäre ein etwas aussagekräftigerer Kommentar schön.
Александр Синявский (2025-11-09 18:51:39+00:00): Добрый день!
На улице Строителей не везде есть велопереезды. В частности, через улицу Желябова нет велопереезда. Согласно ПДД, там необходимо спешиваться, так как нет ни разметки "1.15", ни велосипедного светофора.
Александр Синявский (2025-11-09 18:53:29+00:00): Я отслеживаю в городе все велосипедные дрожки, велопешеходные дорожки и велополосы. Если что, пишите в телегу @Alek_virion
Langlaeufer (2025-07-22 17:22:36+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:bicycle_road%3Dyes (track ist schon richtig, wenn die Fahrradstraße für Landwirtschaftlichen verkehr freigegeben ist. access=permisses kommt weg. foot=yes ist überflüssig
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169274299
lankapuhelin (2025-07-23 19:55:29+00:00): Tästä tiestä oltiin käyty keskustelua xinotin kanssa karttailmoituksessa https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4840666, missä päädyttiin vaihtamaan pathiksi. Mistä syystä päädyit vaihtamaan footwayksi?
lankapuhelin (2025-07-23 19:56:37+00:00): Vaihdoit myös tien linjausta. Mielestäni se ei kulje noin rannassa maastokäyntihavaintojen perusteella. Aiempi linjaus oli mielestäni parempi.
liljaadeliina (2025-08-13 06:41:22+00:00): Se oli virhe, tie on path, eikä footway. Muutin sen takaisin pathiksi.
Langlaeufer (2025-08-11 09:49:29+00:00): Hallo Stephan,
du hast einige Fahrradstraßen in Altenhagen erfasst. Das Tagging war jedoch unvollständig oder widersprüchlich. Können wir da bitte nochmal zusammen durchgegen. Welche Straßen und Feldwege bei Feldwege als Fahrradstraßen beschildert sind und welche Ausnahmen genau beschildert sind.

siehe auch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:bicycle_road%3Dyes
Langlaeufer (2025-08-11 09:53:34+00:00): Spezieller: ist der Trinkhorstweg mittlerweile auch Fahrradstraße, wenn ja bis wo?
Sind die Wege/Straßen von BBS bis zum Sportplatz Fahrradstraßen, wenn ja welche Ausnahmen (Anlieger/Kfz/Landwirt. Verkehr) gelten wo? Ist "Am Silberberg auch innerorts in Altenhagen Fahrradstraße?
Stephan-4711 (2025-08-11 10:06:48+00:00): Altenhägerkirchweg komplett Fahrradstr. Am Ende von Celle stehen dort Poller da ist der Weg als Feldweg eingezeichnet. Das ist ein Schotterweg und auch komplett Fahrradstr. bis Altenhagen. Der Trinkhorstweg ist ab der Kreuzung Am Feuerwehrhaus Fahrradstr. KFZ Frei bis zur Kreuzung am Sportplatz. Am Feuerwehrhaus und Am Reiherpfahl bis zur Abknickenden VOrfahrtstr. an den Berufsschulen sind Fahrradstr. Trinkhorstweg Kreuzung bis Kreuzung am Silberweg ist Fahrradstr. Landwirtschaftlicher verkehr frei. Am Silberber von dieser Kreuzung bis Bostel ist Fahrradstr. KFZ frei. Würde das auf nem Screenshot einzeichnen, aber weiß nicht, wie ich den hier rein kopieren kann.
Langlaeufer (2025-08-11 15:29:49+00:00): wenn du magst, können wir uns im community-chat weiterunterhalten: da kann man medien einbinden:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/u/langlaeufer/
Langlaeufer (2025-08-11 19:30:06+00:00): danke erstmal, ich hab das jetzt entsprechend eingetragen.
Langlaeufer (2025-08-11 19:33:18+00:00): etwas merkwürdig finde ich noch das stück https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169274682 ( von mir selbst so getaggt, weil dort vermutlich keine Beschilderung stand. Fahrradstraße macht scheint dort keinen Sinn zu ergeben  weil es in einen Feldweg übergeht - eine Verbindungstraße ist es aber auch nichts, weil dort kein Ziel existiert.
Langlaeufer (2025-08-11 19:33:51+00:00): sorry, falscher link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30753568
Langlaeufer (2025-08-11 19:36:00+00:00): ist hier grass/grade5 zutreffend?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38810715
Stephan-4711 (2025-08-12 04:38:56+00:00): ist hier grass/grade5 zutreffend?
osm.org/way/38810715

ich glaube schon, das ist irgendso ein weg zwischen den feldern. nie genauer drauf geachtet
Stephan-4711 (2025-08-12 04:42:43+00:00): sorry, falscher link: osm.org/way/30753568

war ich das? ne das ist keine Fahrradstr
NeisBot (2025-07-22 06:21:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-23 06:52:08+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/169286984
Fraxi (2025-07-22 07:20:04+00:00): В ж.к. Иван Вазов(северно от ул. Бяла Черква), е пълно с такива. Ако ти се занимава...
Dimitar155 (2025-07-22 13:56:44+00:00): В района на почти всяка панелка има поне по един, не са само в Иван Вазов :). Конкретно в Иван Вазов има и няколко обществени простора, но не съм видял да се ползват по очевидни причини.
Fraxi (2025-07-22 15:53:25+00:00): Знам, че има. Тук визирах конкретно района и ако ти се занимава да ги добавяш. Иначе за цяла София....
Dimitar155 (2025-07-24 05:10:55+00:00): До 2040 г. може и да стане, евентуално :)
MarkB@OSM (2025-07-27 01:12:52+00:00): Kanchakanok Ville should be Kan Kanok Ville. Are you sure บ้านแก้วตารักษ์ is correct? Other maps show the old name ใจแก้วเอราวัณ Chai Kaeo Erawan. There's also a big sign inside the estate on streetview.
julcnx (2025-07-27 02:11:34+00:00): Maybe Karnkanok Ville is better, as per the official usage from the company and google listings: https://www.facebook.com/KarnkanokProperty/?locale=th_TH

For the other community, I must have mixde up names, the only sign I found on KartaView and and StreetView for the lower community is: https://www.google.com/maps/@18.7222069,99.0275959,3a,25.7y,91.26h,90.2t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sm3jcLyFH2duag5onQ5WDlA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D-0.20000000000000284%26panoid%3Dm3jcLyFH2duag5onQ5WDlA%26yaw%3D91.26!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDcyMy4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
MarkB@OSM (2025-07-27 02:48:17+00:00): Karnkanok is also good. The sign for the other community is the old name, so I would change  that to Chai Kaeo Erawan.
julcnx (2025-07-27 10:55:18+00:00): Sounds good!
MarkB@OSM (2025-07-29 08:01:31+00:00): Changed.
NeisBot (2025-07-22 06:30:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
Woazboat (2025-07-22 18:25:44+00:00): Low quality SEO spam with incorrect tagging scheme reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169308145
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-23 06:51:23+00:00): 👍 Thank you Woazboat
olo81 (2025-07-22 08:23:06+00:00): Wreszcie ma to coraz większy sens. Ale nadal położenie na geoportalu znajduje się  na Leśniczówce.
C2oc4 (2025-07-22 12:49:18+00:00): Zgadza się tylko że tamta Mołojka to inna miejscowość. Cała ta enklawa (5 domów) nazywana była Mołojką od 1959 roku (dokument rady powiatu).
olo81 (2025-08-18 21:17:23+00:00): Są dwie Mołojki? oddalone od siebie o kilometr? W tym samym powiecie?
olo81 (2025-08-18 21:18:46+00:00): kolejna nazwa opisowa do poprawy: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7853453549
C2oc4 (2025-08-21 16:24:07+00:00): Ta w siemoni to zgodnie z:
Źródło: Dokument "Prezydium Powiatowej rady Narodowej w Będzinie z dnia 15-II-56r."
olo81 (2025-08-24 13:21:27+00:00): Drugiej nie znajduje. A dwie w jednej gminie to chyba niemożliwe. Daj linka do drugiej jeśli istnieje. https://pzgik.geoportal.gov.pl/prng/Miejscowosc/PL.PZGiK.204.PRNG.00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000082945-63789
C2oc4 (2025-08-25 12:00:41+00:00): Mołojca dotyczy się całego tego obszaru
olo81 (2025-08-25 12:26:02+00:00): To jak widzisz pod linkiem Mołojca dotyczy leśniczówki i tam powinna być pozycja z nazwą.
C2oc4 (2025-08-25 12:35:41+00:00): A co ze źródłem który jest wpisani? Jest to dokument urzędowy.
Dodatkowo ludzie na to miejsce tak wołają tak samo jak Pomłynie to nie Siemonia w oczach wielu mieszkańców :)
olo81 (2025-08-25 12:41:45+00:00): Jak widzisz pod linkiem ten dokument podaje dokładną nazwę i miejsce.  To że też mówią tak na te kilka domów nie znaczy że można dawać kilka Mołojek.
C2oc4 (2025-08-27 05:52:49+00:00): Ta ale nie tą miejscowość :)
olo81 (2025-09-03 23:16:22+00:00): W źródle, które podałeś, czyli Wikipedii. Sam dodałeś przysiółki. Dodałeś je z błędem i bez podania adnotacji do źródeł. 
Można to nazwać tworzeniem fikcyjnych źródeł.
Na wikipedi też nadaje się to tylko do wywalenia.
joel56dt (2025-07-22 16:14:18+00:00): Hi justinsenemy,

First, thanks for all the contributions you have been making in the Richmond area. I have seen you putting a lot of work in and it's great to see the area getting refined.

I just want you be aware that using copyrighted material to draw features in OSM violates the project's open licence. Please refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ#Can_I_trace_data_from_Google_Maps/Nokia_Maps/...?

I believe using emergency maps to draw indoor features is unacceptable to this project, however, IANAL and may have misunderstood Canadian copyright law. I recommend you open a discussion at community.openstreetmap.org so we can get a clear direction from the community if this is an acceptable practice or not.

Thanks,
Joel
Sébastien Pi (2025-07-22 20:30:27+00:00): Salut,

J’ai vu que tu avais relié avec le chemin qui longe le passage à niveau. Je ne savais pas que qu’il y allait avoir une liaison. T’es sûr ?

Je me suis permis de modifier le type en piste cyclable pour être cohérent avec le reste de la LINO : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169312611#map=15/50.60603/3.01426&layers=N
T’en penses quoi ?

D’ailleurs, je n’avais pas remarqué mais il n’y a pas de « foot ». Donc en théorie, les piétons n’ont pas le droit d’être ici d’après OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#France)
Or, la loi permet aux piétons d’utiliser à pied les pistes cyclables hors agglomération (pareil pour les mob‘).
Je rajouterais bien un « foot=yes » sur la piste et « foot=no » sur la LINO en temps que telle. Idem pour les cavaliers/mobylettes.
T’en repenses quoi ? :)
BardafFr (2025-07-23 06:06:26+00:00): Hello, oui il va y avoir une liaison, c'est sur et certain.
Pour ce qui est du chemin en voie cyclable ou en voie cyclable et piéton, cette voie aura le statut de voie verte, donc cycle et piéton, c'est pour ça que je l'ai mis de cette façon. Le reste de la LINO n'était pas comme cela car je ne connaissait pas encore ce type de chemin lorsque je l'avais tracé à l'époque. Oui pour le foot=no sur la LINO des motorisé, ce serait effectivement mieux
Sébastien Pi (2025-07-23 18:05:41+00:00): Merci pour l’info. Plutôt une bonne chose.
Je ne savais pas que ça serait une voie verte, tu as bien fait dans ce cas. Je ne suis pas sûr de comprendre la phrase qui suit. La LINO1 est aussi en voie verte ?

Je ne vais pas mettre l’access no finalement. Comme il n’y a pas de panneau et j’ai regardé le wiki, y a ça qui paraît plus adapté :
When a sidewalk is mapped separately, add the tag sidewalk:both=separate, sidewalk:left=separate, or sidewalk:right=separate to the carriageway it borders, depending on which side or sides of the street have a separately mapped sidewalk.
Sébastien Pi (2025-07-23 18:29:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169360846#map=15/50.60448/3.01437&layers=N
BardafFr (2025-07-23 19:46:35+00:00): J'ai modifié l'ensemble de la voie cycle qui est en voie verte par un chemin cycle et piéton
Sébastien Pi (2025-07-23 20:55:20+00:00): Je te fais confiance^^.
J’avais pas fait attention qu’il y avait le panneau.

Il y est pas depuis le rond-point (95 % je passe ici) https://api.panoramax.xyz/?focus=pic&map=18.66/50.6040477/3.0277862&pic=390e9983-7c98-4e66-97e6-7162e4aad325&speed=250&theme=score&xyz=192.11/-11.08/64

Mais depuis l’autre bout il y est https://api.panoramax.xyz/?focus=pic&map=18.18/50.600771/3.011078&pic=64155173-7a50-49e6-b746-6174773799f3&speed=250&theme=score&xyz=28.87/-9.07/84

Je pense que c’est pour cela que je ne savais pas. Du coup 100 % ok pour path/bike/foot.
Cucazer (2026-01-16 18:59:54+00:00): Hello!

Why "incorrectly assigned street name"? See https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1407744789609071 and https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1086476083298707. Living streets should have names, which is indicated by the sign. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=255822533120370 shows the end of living street, so the transition to the unnamed unclassified road looks valid.
Mezonens (2026-01-17 08:49:29+00:00): Hi!

The street name was assigned incorrectly, because according to VARIS (Valsts adrešu reģistra informācijas sistēma) data, this is not 18. Novembra iela. This road segment does not have any official name at all. It also has no name according to LĢIA data.

18. Novembra iela runs perpendicular to this street. A living street cannot be given a name that does not apply to it just because such streets are expected to have a name. I mapped the living street only up to the relevant road sign. The continuation beyond that point as an unclassified road seems logical to me.
HellMap (2026-01-17 12:39:36+00:00): By the way, you can specify `source:name=sign` to show that a street is named based on the signage. This usually happens for non-official and local names. That is, someone looking at this on-the-ground would conclude that this is the name. Unfortunately, it seems that in this location the Council installed the sign without properly defining street lines for VZD/VARIS. So the road doesn't have an official street name even though the sign points to it. I don't think we have a clear consensus in Latvia what to do about such cases.
richlv (2026-01-17 13:56:42+00:00): Mapping-wise, we don't have a clear consensus. Usually it's case-by-case.
In general, the best is to inform the local council and/or VZD. In the past, emailing the VZD data team has allowed to tap into their experience into who is the best contact to get things resolved.
richlv (2026-01-17 13:58:36+00:00): In this particular case, they seem to have partially decided to assign "18. novembra iela" to offshoots, which in general seems like a rather bad practice. Maybe in the long term it could be discouraged in Latvia, but that's outside the scope here :)
Cucazer (2026-01-20 17:12:34+00:00): Hm, the rabbit hole goes deeper than I thought :)

What about the similar streets to the west from here? There I've also added the names based on the signs seen on Mapillary (which seems closer to the "ground truth"). Again, these do not have any names on https://kartes.lgia.gov.lv/?x=198761.60&y=663701.25&zoom=8&basemap=topokarte. Or is VARIS a different source?

That's all because I'm coming with the experience of StreetComplete quest primarily asking for residential and living street names. And I'm quite used to the cases where the same street name continues into the turns (especially with living streets).
HellMap (2026-01-20 17:37:56+00:00): Those don't have an official name either. Only the main highway has a street name in the VZD street line data.

VZD and VARIS are the same "source", broadly speaking. VZD is the state agency that maintains the VAR(IS) address database.

For the purposes of SC, these should normally be tagged noname=yes. But, as you say, street signs on the ground are ambiguous, so how could one know. Ideally, we will map all street names from the database directly first, so SC doesn't really need to offer this quest (like they don't offer some other address-related ones anymore in Latvia).

From experience, in Latvia may be 1% of street lines have offshoots into side roads. Normally, these are either not named or named differently. There are many crazy streets layouts, but most often street lines are just continuous lines without branching. So if you see the name on the main road, offshoots more than likely don't actually have the same name, at least in the official data.
richlv (2026-01-20 22:25:29+00:00): To make things worse, there are regions (I recall some in Kurzeme) where a place would have streets, name signs... but nothing in VZD data.
Presumably this was the local council assigning names but never sharing that info with VZD. I did not get to reporting it to VZD back then and forgot where exactly I spotted it.
Somewhat similar to the case here, although here assigning the name to offshoots itself would be great to discourage.
Cucazer (2026-01-20 22:39:06+00:00): While we're at it, I'll add a similar case. Daugavpils municipal(?) map https://kartes.lgia.gov.lv/?x=194299.12&y=658366.66&zoom=10&basemap=topokarte clearly shows that the parallel street is also named the same. I've tagged this accordingly in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170010555. But... is it the same in the VZD data?
HellMap (2026-01-20 22:55:18+00:00): That topo map isn't the same as VZD data. I'm not entirely sure how they assemble and edit it and how often (I've never looked into it). I don't think kartes.lgia.lv actually has any map with street lines, because the lines are often messy. You would need to parse https://data.gov.lv/dati/dataset/varis-atvertie-dati or use one of the internal layers from LGIA/LVM WMS service such as [1].

Many roads are represented by just one line, so when in reality there are several parallel roads, it's often down to mapper judgement. For example, the northwest end of that street is actually Stacijas iela, which turns around the corner.

[1] https://lvmgeoserver.lvm.lv/geoserver/ows?FORMAT=image/jpeg&VERSION=1.3.0&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=public:Orto_LKS,publicwfs:Kadastra_karte,publicwfs:arisstreet,publicwfs:arisroad,publicwfs:arisbuilding&STYLES=&CRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}&BBOX={bbox}
Joudenijhuis (2025-07-22 07:39:27+00:00): Gelezen en begrepen
rene78 (2025-07-22 15:53:19+00:00): Hi ainayusof,

are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/859347474 is not going all the way through? At least for pedestrian? I am pretty sure that I have walked there in the past.

Thanks for double-checking
Rene
GrabMY_ainayusof (2025-07-23 01:22:51+00:00): Hello rene

My apologies for not noticing the inner road. Our user has reported the specific way id mentioning it cannot be accessed from w859347473. To my finding, there is signboard alerting road user on incoming car. Can you please verify if it is a oneway or two way road?

Thanks
rene78 (2025-07-24 05:26:45+00:00): Unfortunately I don't know whether this is a oneway road or not. If I pass by one day I'll check. Thanks for updating the map!
NeisBot (2025-07-22 07:16:59+00:00): Hi SarinWasim, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added various shops, amenities, and community facilities, including food establishments, retail stores, places of worship, and cultural centers, to the map."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
NeisBot (2025-07-22 07:12:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-23 06:50:41+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/169326212
Langlaeufer (2025-07-22 17:18:36+00:00): Ist das ein neubau oder hast du die richtige Lage nur nicht getroffen? Am besten die ESRI-Luftbilder verwenden und genügen ranzoomen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169277132