piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2025-04-02 04:08:15+00:00): The footprints you added here represent buildings visible in imagery. They could however be more accurate and should have been squared using (q) after tagging. Generally it is easier to obtain accurate results if you undersize the footprints a little then scale them up after squaring: Press ? to see ID editing shortcuts to see how to do this.--- Unless you know that buildings share a common wall then you should not map them with shared nodes hold alt to prevent this. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164095115
eggie (2025-03-31 07:42:06+00:00): Dag donux.. Je vraagt feedback.. Lijkt me oke zo.
MVG
eggie
misha yakin (2025-04-05 00:36:10+00:00): Добрый день!
Уточните, пожалуйста, что подразумевалось под этим -- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1371341330 ?
Это явно не похоже на landuse=commercial. Если это территория строительства, то  это скорее landuse=construction, ну а если строительство новой дороги, то лучше её обозначить линией с highway=construction.
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2025-05-28 14:34:12+00:00): Hello ToprakM,
I noticed a huge increase in the hydro network in this part of Cyprus and I came across your changeset.
Reading your source I see "Kitchener's Survey of Cyprus". If I'm not wrong is an ancient book written 150 years ago.
Knowing a bit how much the climate changed in Mediterranean Sea in the last 150 years, I wonder how much that book could be still considered as a trusted source for some mapping nowadays.
I got a message from some colleagues who work inside the Buffer Zone, and were a bit surprised by that big increase.
ToprakM (2025-05-29 07:45:53+00:00): Hello Ale_Zena,

Yes, you're absolutely right — Kitchener’s Survey of Cyprus is indeed more than a century old, and I fully agree that the region's climate has changed considerably since then. I used this historical source mainly to identify and name certain parts of the river network.

However, I do not rely on Kitchener’s survey alone when mapping. Before adding any feature, I always check current satellite imagery, elevation data, and visible landforms to ensure that the streams or dry beds still exist today in some form. If there is no sign of physical presence or flow path, I do not include it.

Best
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-25 20:43:38+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12700448219

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-03-25 20:36:37+00:00): Dag Melchior... Het is niet nodig om oneway=no toe te voegen aan reguliere wegen. Het is default.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-25 20:45:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Je hoeft geen bus=yes toe te voegen aan een busbaan. Dat is deafult.
Implies

    access=no
    bus=designated
    emergency=yes

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbusway

Wat is het probleem hier? 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
user_22674047 (2025-03-25 20:56:42+00:00): Het probleem waar ik tegenaan loop is dat ik een broutercode heb gemaakt voor een website die ik heb gemaakt om reizen te loggen die ik heb gemaakt in bussen, treinen, vliegtuigen, en het accepteert de busway niet tenzij ik bus=yes toevoeg om deze route hierheen te leiden. Ik wist niet dat het een probleem zou zijn, het spijt me heel erg. Ik heb overal ter wereld gekeken en veel van de andere busways hadden de bus=yes tag toegevoegd, dus ik dacht niet dat het een probleem zou zijn.
eggie (2025-03-25 21:15:49+00:00): Hoi...   Het is geen probleem die tag, maar het zou default moeten zijn in de routering.
Brouter zou zich dus 'moeten' confirmeren aan de tagging binnen OSM.

Ik heb overigens geen tags verwijderd.
Je kunt het vergelijken met foot=designated op een highway=footway. Dat is ook default. Kwaad kan het niet. Je zou het eens aan de orde kunnen stellen op het forum van OSM of een berichtje naar Brouter kunnen sturen.
Zie verder de wiki.

MVG
eggie
tguen (2025-05-20 07:17:21+00:00): Please don't add multiple shop tags for the same business. One on the main building or the area containing all the buildings is enough.
EthanMDFW (2025-05-20 17:48:47+00:00): Hi! I'm still relatively new to OSM, is there documentation explaining why we shouldn't tag all individual buildings? I sometimes make use of extracts of OSM buildings, and having each building tagged is useful so I know what it's purpose is.
tguen (2025-05-21 06:49:58+00:00): This falls under the "One feature, one OSM element" principle. A shop tag represents a business. If each building has a shop tag it implies that each is a separate business.

If you're using building extracts, you can use the building tag to denote its purpose, e.g. building=storage. Unfortunately there is no easy and reliable way to associate a building with a business.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
TrickyFoxy (2025-03-25 23:38:45+00:00): Сомнительно. Между этими подстанциями уже нарисована 35к ЛЭП
dypa (2025-03-26 12:35:57+00:00): столбы в поле https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6578448 стоят (пример https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4648877456), а вот https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12700458600 точка в реке - это явно ошибка
eggie (2025-03-25 20:47:08+00:00): No need to tag bus=yes or designated  It's default.
Gr eggie
rempshaener (2025-03-25 21:05:36+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.

Zu den einzelnen Tags:

access=no, bicycle=no, horse=no, motor_vehicle=no
Das ist vor Ort (siehe Mapillary) so nicht ausgewiesen. Es wäre auch doppelt hinderlich: zum einen verhindert es z. B. das Routing auch für die Feuerwehr, zum anderen wäre es nur auf dem kurzen Stück zwischen Rad-/Fußweg und Tor richtig, da z. B. Radfahrer an dieser Stelle zwischen Radweg und Sorsumer Straße wechseln dürfen.

name=Feuerwehrausfahrt
Das ist kein Name, sondern eine Beschreibung.

oneway=yes
Das ist so nicht ausgewiesen. Ein Schild „Feuerwehrausfahrt“ hat damit erst einmal nichts zu tun. Zumal das Schild bei geöffnetem Tor nicht sichtbar ist. Es muss zwingend ein Schild "Einbahnstraße" ausgewiesen sein.

So wie es seit 2013 erfasst war, passte es meines Erachten.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2025-03-25 21:09:25+00:00): Nachtrag: implizit vorstellbar wäre für das kürzere Stück ein access=private
TornadoFang (2025-03-25 21:17:08+00:00): Ich kann dir sagen, das es so ist. Ich komme aus dem Ort und bin in der Feuerwehr. Einige Kameraden sind von der Straße reingefahren und haben Ärger vom Ortsbrandmeister und vom Zugfüherer bekommen. Kannst dich gerne erkundigen.
rempshaener (2025-03-25 21:22:19+00:00): Daher mein Vorschlag des access=private. Wenn da jemand außerhalb der „Disziplinargewalt“ der Feuerwehr reinfährt, kann er/sie das tun - es gilt immer noch die Straßenverkehrsordnung.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2025-03-26 18:24:07+00:00): Hallo,
nur noch einmal zur Klarstellung, was aus meiner Sicht anzupassen ist.

Die Zufahrt wäre an dem gemeinsamen Node mit dem Rad-/Fußweg zu trennen.
An den Abschnitt zwischen Sorsumer Straße und Rad-/Fußweg gehört ausschließlich highway=service.

An den Abschnitt zwischen Rad-/Fußweg und Tor kann neben dem highway=service ein access=private. Das entspricht dem Regelzustand durch das geschlossene Tor; andere Mapper würden selbst das negieren, ich halte das aber für vertretbar.

Alles andere entspricht nicht den gängigen Standards, also insbesondere was
- name
- oneway
angeht.

Viele Grüße
TornadoFang (2025-03-26 18:34:28+00:00): Ich gebe es nur so weiter wie es uns gesagt wird und deren aussagen habe gründe und haben hand und fuß.
rempshaener (2025-03-26 18:48:40+00:00): Das habe ich berücksichtigt
TornadoFang (2025-03-26 18:52:17+00:00): Ok. Ich danke dir,dass wir uns geeignit haben und eine Lösung erarbeitet haben.
Langlaeufer (2025-03-26 19:09:28+00:00): sorry, jetzt hab ich euch dazwischengefunkt. bitte einfach so ändern wie ihr euch geeinigt habt. ich gebe im Anschluss meinen Senf dazu.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164096424
rempshaener (2025-03-26 17:23:43+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.

Ich denke, ich kann nachvollziehen, weshalb du diesen Weg angelegt hast, gehe aber davon aus, dass das nicht so bleiben kann.
Es scheint sich um einen Fußweg (und Radweg?) zu handeln, der gleichzeitig auch Feuerwehrzufahrt ist.
Dafür wird kein zweiter Weg angelegt, sondern der bestehende Weg – z.B. dieses Stück hier www.openstreetmap.org/way/89696626 ­– erhält zusätzlich die Eigenschaften für eine Feuerwehrzufahrt.
Das ist hier beschrieben: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE%3ATag%3Aservice%3Demergency_access
Entsprechend wird emergency=designated ergänzt.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
TornadoFang (2025-03-26 18:18:13+00:00): Wir fahren entweder vom Bürgermeister-Klages-Platz, ecke Bushaltestelle auf oder von der Wiesenstraße
Đuro Jiří (2025-08-09 14:11:49+00:00): Ciao jioele, voglio solo informarti, che ho appena cancellato questa pista ciclopedonale, perché non esiste. Sto caricando immagini su Mapillary,se vuoi verificare.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1371350189
Saluti
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:09:50+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535919
SekeRob (2025-03-26 05:42:47+00:00): Hi,

You mapped a bunch of buildings with names on top of already mapped buildings.

1 These are business names that belong on POI nodes, with type of business, address, contact info etc
2.obviously your duplicate buildings need to be backed out.

Please correct
SekeRob (2025-03-26 05:44:12+00:00): Ps Clarity imagery is old. Please use much newer Bing.
eggie (2025-03-31 08:15:25+00:00): Yep.. Dit is inderdaad zo de bedoeling.
Groet
eggie
silversurfer83 (2025-03-26 19:08:53+00:00): HI there :)

I appreciate you giving detailed sources now. Would it be possible to adjust your comments in accordance to this wiki article?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

thank you and happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164097510
user_19971463 (2025-08-09 09:56:55+00:00): Ciao, ho visto la cascata, ma è presente qualche foto online per vedere in che condizioni è? Grazieee
Allison P (2025-03-26 19:38:59+00:00): Checking against Sentinel 2 satellite photo, this alignment looks very close. Thank you for updating it!
NeisBot (2025-03-26 05:14:42+00:00): Hi Rnurko, and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear or difficult to understand.

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment
marc__marc (2026-01-24 20:17:09+00:00): Bonjour,
je ne comprend pas ta modification.
c'est une station v4 ? on peux ajouter model=v4 pour clairifier la chose.
si c'est une v4, tous est socket:type2_combo... hors tu as justement effacé ce tag pour garder l'ancien tag tag ambigu du temps de v1 et v2 qui avaient des type2 non combo mais boosté en dc spécial tesla
Et dans le même temps tu crées une 2ieme station (alors qu'il n'y a qu'une station) avec des type2
NikoJorj (2026-01-24 21:37:13+00:00): Bonne remarque! Bon, pour voir les choses de façon positive, je fais moins de sonneries maintenant qu'il y a un an ;o& et j'ai essayé de corriger tout ça.
NikoJorj (2026-01-24 21:38:44+00:00): Et en l'occurrence il y a 8 v3 et 8v4 ce qui fait peu de différence pour l'utilisateur (un peu pour les non-Tesla quand même, le câble des v4 est plus long, mais c'est le genre de chose qu'il faudrait cartographier par point de charge non?).
marc__marc (2026-01-25 11:34:55+00:00): on peux effectivement renseigner cela sur les bornes si tu as envie d'aller à ce niveau de détail.
mais rien que model=v3;v4 sur la station devrait permettre à celui qui le désire de sélectionner la version qui convient à son envie (ou pas) de longueur de cable
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:09:44+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535918
totera (2025-03-25 22:22:20+00:00): Do you have any source for the outline of this shop https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1371355927 or are you just guessing?
SomeoneElse (2025-04-17 21:21:47+00:00): I'm guessing that "building=yesrunning_or_walking_while_listening_to_some_music_or_a_podcast_can_get_you_into_a_great_rhythm_-_please_just_be_careful_that_it_doesn’t_end_up_distracting_you._when_crossing_the_road,_temporarily_remove_your_headphones_and_avoid_interacting_with_your_ph" was an accident here?
I've changed that in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165089530
Đuro Jiří (2025-03-26 21:43:25+00:00): Ciao jioele,qui hai aggiunto landuse=construction sul edificio e anche come l'area. Se edificio era demolito si mappa come demolished:building=yes. Invece edificio in costruzione come building=construction. Tra l'altro se è zona area di costruzione, direi che non si li può conare nessun evento,in quel caso bisogna togliere amenity=events_venue.
Saluti
SomeoneElse (2025-03-26 20:17:18+00:00): Thanks - I've also removed the building tag from the outer in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164137615 (it's already on the relation) and moved the wikidata from the outer to the relation.
Gabriele Dri (2025-03-26 13:39:54+00:00): Thank you for the correction of my mistake. I used the wrong tag
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-25 22:01:08+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12700627836
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889321336

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
TheNightRider (2025-03-29 20:38:32+00:00): Hey @brendan77, the access tag has been a mess and I got bad advice from @Baloo Uriza, who has over 38K edits. He was the one who said to change to access=customers. After seeing dimmed "Tesla Supercharger" and then dimmed "Electrify America" after adding both stations in Lordsburg,NM, I really dug in. He was right on everything else with good suggestions, but wrong on this.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access , which for "customers" says: "... If access is open to any person willing to pay, consider using fee=yes (+access=yes) instead." 

Also, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=customers says "access=customers applies to features which may be used or accessed only by customers of a specific facility such as a shop or restaurant."

So clearly it should be access=yes . Whew!
zstadler (2025-08-06 11:37:16+00:00): Hello  TedIsAwesome,

Thank you for your contributions to OSM!

The Israeli West Bank barrier cannot be tagged as a boundary because it has an open geometry that cannot be represented as a multipolygon.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Relation:boundary&uselang=en says about boundary relations:

They are defined in a similar manner as multipolygons: they must contain at least one outer way, and additional ways can be used to define enclaves or exclaves. 

This changeset was therefore reverted.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:09:36+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535917
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:09:29+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535913
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:09:23+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535912
enemenebene (2025-04-17 16:37:28+00:00): Ja, wirklich besser so, bin zum entfernen irgendwie nicht mehr gekommen. Danke dir
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:09:17+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535909
Syl (2025-03-26 11:20:30+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai enlevé l'opérateur "vêtements" que vous aviez ajouté. À ma connaissance il n'existe pas de structure avec ce nom.
zizou0740 (2025-03-26 18:53:20+00:00): Bonjour, en effet j'ai mal lu ce qui était demandé... C'est bien une erreur de ma part ! 
J'ai cette fois mis le nom de l'opérateur
Jrachi (2025-03-29 10:54:10+00:00): Ciao.
Via del Fantini.
Non ho capito cosa hai fatto!
Hai creato una relazione, l'hai duplicata e inserita nella prima relazione.
Se vuoi creare un itinerario composto da più relazioni devi prima creare le singole relazioni e poi inserire queste in una relazione che le raccoglie senza altri elementi (guidepost o altro fanno parte delle relazioni delle singole tappe).
Ti sconsiglio, inoltre, di usare superroute, è identico alla route ma non è gestito dalla maggior parte dei consumatori di dati.
Ivo
andrea il greco bovina (2025-03-29 15:54:04+00:00): Ciao Ivo, Con il CAI Bologna abbiamo già inserito  Via Mater Dei e Art Trail con la stessa procedura . Creiamo due relazioni una per il percorso ed una per la tappa e poi le inseriamo contemporaneamente sui vari tratti. Abbiamo visto che anche la Via degli Dei e la Via Francesca della Sambuca sono state inserite così o almeno sembra. Il risultato finale è quello. 
Dato che da poco ho iniziato ad inserire i dati mi puoi spiegare meglio cosa intendi per " non è gestito dalla maggior parte dei consumatori di dati".
chi sono i consumatori di dati ? che conseguenze potrebbe avere utilizzare superroute ?
Grazie per i consigli
Jrachi (2025-03-29 16:23:30+00:00): Comincio dai consumatori di dati.
Sono tutti quelli che utilizzano i dati da OSM per qualche motivo.
Ad esempio le app per gli escursionisti, i navigatori, i render (strumenti per disegnare una mappa).
Anche le relazioni Mater Dei e Art Trail sono un disastro!
Una superroute non deve contenere le way e le relazioni , ma solo le relazioni delle tappe.
Se vuoi posso:
1) sistemare una relazione, scegli tu
2) fare un incontro online e farti vedere passo passo come fare.

Ivo
CorruptComputer (2025-06-30 15:10:23+00:00): I've changed the tagging of this from `natural=peak` to `natural=hill` in changeset/168314108.

Tbh, I don't think this should be tagged as a hill either, but its at least more accurate than a peak. An `ele=12` is barely a hill, but definitely not a mountain peak.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:09:11+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535907
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:09:04+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535904
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:08:59+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535901
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:08:52+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535898
Supaplex (2025-03-26 04:31:44+00:00): 可以把舊的點位，變成線段的一部分，就能不用移除然後保留原先歷史資訊
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164100670
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:08:44+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535893
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:08:37+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535887
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:08:30+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535885
YPGGUUY (2025-08-19 06:12:01+00:00): 您好, 不建议使用 name 表示楼号, 而建议用 ref 或 addr:housenumber. 也不建议写入通名(座, 号楼).
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:08:22+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535881
NeisReview (2025-03-26 07:00:15+00:00): #NodeDragging

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for contributing to the map. I’ve reviewed your recent edits and noticed that at least one node of a way was moved. This can sometimes happen unintentionally, and it’s led to some unusual intersections or overlaps between street segments and other map elements.

Could you kindly confirm whether these changes were intentional or if they may have been made by mistake?

Thank you, and I look forward to your response!

---
https://osm.org/way/304669556
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:08:18+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535880
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:08:10+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535877
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:08:02+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535876
jmarchon (2025-03-27 02:54:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:07:53+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535873
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:07:46+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535869
Glassman (2025-03-26 21:55:29+00:00): It looks you acidentally connected the new bldg to the power line. I went ahead and unconnected them. Also, bldgs looks so much nicer when squared. To square buildings, just select the outline and type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164101319
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:07:37+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535867
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:07:30+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535865
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:07:23+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535862
NeisReview (2025-03-26 06:07:26+00:00): #NoTags

Hi, welcome to OSM.

I've reviewed your latest map edits and it seems that this changeset you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:07:20+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535858
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:07:17+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535856
NeisReview (2025-03-26 06:07:47+00:00): #NoTags

Hi, welcome to OSM.

I've reviewed your latest map edits and it seems that this changeset you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:07:13+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535855
NeisReview (2025-03-26 06:08:04+00:00): #NoTags

Hi, welcome to OSM.

I've reviewed your latest map edits and it seems that this changeset you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:07:10+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535851
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:07:06+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535850
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:07:03+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535847
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:06:56+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535845
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:06:47+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535844
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:06:38+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535841
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:06:30+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535834
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:06:22+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535830
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:06:14+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535827
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:06:11+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535825