piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aceman444 (2024-04-14 09:53:18+00:00): Zdravim, naco je dobra tato zmena? Co bolo zle na highway=service? NIektore tie useky, co nie su cestou tretej triedy su v katastri ako lesne cesty, takze povysenie na unclassified je dost podozrive.
A par kratkych usekov ste zabudli, takze to teraz vyzera divne.
infeeeee (2024-04-10 19:20:57+00:00): Szia!

Bezárt kocsmáknál, éttermeknél, üzleteknél  a disused: prefix használata ajánlott a pont törlése helyett. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:*

Tehát elég lett volna, ha csak az amenity=pub címkét átjavítod disused:amenity=pub-ra, így már nem jelenítik meg a megjelenítők. Ez azért is hasznos, mert ha később más üzlet vagy étterem nyílik ugyanott, akkor nem kell új pontot létrehozni, és visszakövethető lesz az üzlethelyiség története, mi nyílt minek a helyén.

Legközelebb eszerint járj el kérlek.

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
bkil (2024-04-10 20:43:19+00:00): Köszönjük a szemfülességet. Visszavontam és átírtam disused prefixre, így megmarad az ID-ra (ha valahol wikiben, weblapon szerepel), címe és a változástörténete is https://osm.org/node/3458956193/history#map=18/47.50606/19.10429
Csutka (2024-04-10 21:04:00+00:00): Köszi a segítséget és az útmutatást!
Peer van Daalen (2024-04-11 15:25:26+00:00): Hallo tux67 | Meinst Du das hier?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1271433770#map=18/50.87989/6.16937

https://www.skf-alsdorf.de/kinder/kita-am-heggestroever/
tux67 (2024-04-11 15:36:18+00:00): Das wirds wohl sein. War auf Kindergarten gekommen als ich dieses ähnliche Gebilde gesehen hatte:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/772129251
Bisher hatte ich nur Lücken von den VDOPs aufgefüllt.
Peer van Daalen (2024-04-11 15:55:35+00:00): Ich hatte mich nur gewundert über das Krickel-Krackel des Gebäudeumriss und dann mal was recherchiert.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4193562#map=18/50.87898/6.16837&layers=N

Seltsame Architektur von der Architektin  Özge Demirci.

Aber der Alsdorfer Bürgermeister Alfred Sonders ist auch ein besonderer Typ. 
Ehrlich, zielstrebig und ein feiner Kerl und Macher ... ;-) .

Trägst Du das dort ein? Sonst mach ich mich morgen mal dran.

Die wichtigsten Daten haben wir ja.

Gruß | Peer
Peer van Daalen (2024-04-11 15:59:06+00:00): Ich sehe gerade, -

Den anderen Kindergarten hatte ich auch eingetragen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/772129251/history/1#map=19/50.87734/6.15010&layers=N
tux67 (2024-04-11 16:06:07+00:00): Na dann kennst du dich ja aus ;-) .. ich mach’ für heute mal Schluss. 
Aber .. wenn du dich in der Gegend auskennst - hast du eine Idee warum 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1271753795
und 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1271753794#map=19/50.88583/6.10906
nicht gemappt waren? Ich hatte schon die Befürchtung, die wurden abgerissen und jemand hat die Gebäude gelöscht, ohne an lifecycle tags zu denken?
Gruß
tux67
tux67 (2024-04-12 07:39:12+00:00): So Kita ist drin .. scheint ja geplant zeitnah zu eröffnen ...
literan (2024-04-10 17:08:06+00:00): это вандализм. Почитайте https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:public_transport

откачу все подобные правки
literan (2024-04-10 17:05:24+00:00): зачем вы удалили точку stop_position автобусов? сломали маршруты. верну
Nakaner (2024-04-11 08:48:06+00:00): Hallo,

ist das komplette Gebäude Obere Inntalstraße 46 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242014122/history) abgerissen worden oder warum hast du es gelöscht?

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149816390
Bad Füssing (2024-04-11 08:52:58+00:00): Hallo,

dieses Gebäude mit der ehemaligen  Sparkasse wurde vor kurzem, im Zuge der Dorfsanierung, komplett abgerissen
Nakaner (2024-04-12 18:39:01+00:00): Hallo,

danke für die Antwort. Ich vermutete zuerst einen Newbie-Fehler. :-)

Viele Grüße

Michael
danieldegroot2 (2024-04-10 12:48:22+00:00): Hey mackerski,

Thanks for the much needed improvements. You seem to be mapping based on the roof outline on regular Esri imagery. Note,
- Usually building outlines are aligned to their footprint. If aerial imagery is taken from the side the roof will be offset from the location of the building footprint.
- In the Kilkenny city area, Esri Clarity is usually better aligned to the 'true' location (and is generally almost top-down), than Bing/Esri.
In the rural area outside the road ring, regular Esri is best used.
- (It may be useful to check if the buildings are correctly placed based on existing buildings, but this is not true everywhere.);
In many places in Kilkenny, the buildings should be alright, some roads may still be inaccurate (last changed a decade ago). Buildings are mostly missing extensions from regular Esri (newer imagery) as you have already noticed.
Also, you may be aware Anne (b-unicycling) has been collecting imagery in march/april/..., some of which may not yet be available as it is still being processed by Mapillary.

I would suggest trying to align this set of houses on the south side (bottom-left) of The Sycamores to Esri Clarity. Elsewhere the difference between Esri Clarity and Esri is minimal.

Regards,

Daniel
mackerski (2024-04-10 13:04:30+00:00): Hi Daniel,
I'm aware of the variety of imagery and the various offsets (back the day, I worked on a system to try to capture local corrections for these) and also of the issues around building "lean". I have been conferring with Anne on the alignment issue for these changes. Your input is useful in terms of the Kilkenny situation, but I'm curious how you find Bing's alignment. In general, I find theirs the most uniformly correct. For this particular set of edits, I chose to leave the alignment as close as possible to where I found them (while separating as required). My intention is to follow up with some local RTK-corrected GPS surveys to capture some known true locations in the area against which imagery layers could be calibrated. In the meantime, the locations of these buildings should be no worse than they were already, and I'm reluctant to invest time in tweaking against an uncertain baseline.

Dermot
danieldegroot2 (2024-04-10 14:00:07+00:00): Bing is too skewed and blurry in places. It is mostly used east of the river Barrow (noting also better resolution there), or anywhere outside Kilkenny and the surrounding area.
The difference in alignment is not too large, but still considerable.
(Bing is shifted to southeast compared to Esri Clarity and existing GPS in one or two places I checked)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-03 11:00:52+00:00): Hello!

You used
colour=weiß
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1347745095/history

Have you maybe meant
colour=white
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
dieterdreist (2024-06-08 22:30:14+00:00): Hi TakeshiKovac, I just notice in your "little adjustment" you deleted Piazza Fiume. Can you please be more careful in your editing?
Thank you,
DD
histrio (2024-04-10 15:02:18+00:00): Hello, I've noticed some unusual edits in this changeset that may not align with the real-world geography. Could you share your sources or reasoning? Thanks!
XimeX (2024-04-10 18:34:18+00:00): Bei dem einen Teilstück hast du lanes statt maxspeed auf 30 gesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6175547
histrio (2024-04-10 15:02:00+00:00): Hello, I've noticed some unusual edits in this changeset that may not align with the real-world geography. Could you share your sources or reasoning? Thanks!"
histrio (2024-04-16 17:56:41+00:00): Hello, I've noticed some unusual edits in this changeset that may not align with the real-world geography. Could you share your sources or reasoning? Thanks!
Quaternion (2024-04-11 12:58:22+00:00): Bitte erneut daran denken, dass Garagenauffahrten den Zusatz service=driveway erfordern.
stimme-logistik (2024-04-12 22:07:37+00:00): Danke für die Erinnerung - das hat meine Kollegin wohl vergessen. tut mir leid.
wies1 (2024-04-10 13:05:43+00:00): Nachfrage: Wird dieses Gebäude ausschließlich als Kindertagestaette genutzt?
dg92 (2024-04-15 05:42:16+00:00): Habe recherchiert. Das kann komplett raus, die sind nämlich an die Marktstraße 16 gezogen.
wies1 (2024-04-10 12:51:50+00:00): Eine Nachfrage: Wird dieses Gebäude ausschliesslich als Kita genutzt? Ich frage, da du dieses komplett entsprechend markiert hast.
dg92 (2024-04-15 05:43:16+00:00): Dieses Gebäude ja. Die 17 wäre ein Frisör, 15 der Kindergarten.
rskedgell (2024-04-10 13:25:05+00:00): You deleted several streets in your edit. This has been reverted.
martianfreeloader (2024-04-14 09:44:57+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your contribution. Just remember that creating changesets with huge geographical extent is discouraged.

Happy mapping!
Leo Slager (2024-04-10 22:35:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Alexey Vazhnov (2024-04-10 21:48:30+00:00): Sorry, I've reverted your deletion. (in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149840115 ).

If a shop is closed, it usually means that editor should put a tag shop=vacant or disused:shop. We are trying to keep the history. Next time here will be another shop or service, and everyone can see a history of this place by clicking https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6781423080/history
Szymson (2024-04-10 15:47:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1271444328
Na podstawie zdjęć satelitarnych wyznaczyłeś geometrię parkingu podziemnego?
Szymson (2024-04-10 15:48:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1271444327
To nie jest parking tylko podjazd do stacji transformatorowej
Dawid2849 (2024-05-29 14:50:48+00:00): Ta relacja to duplikat: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11990812
danieldegroot2 (2024-04-10 12:58:12+00:00): Hey mackerski,

It seems you are changing the check_date based on aerial imagery. Or, are you doing a survey / using Mapillary as you are elsewhere?

I would suggest to not change construction objects based on aerial imagery unless you are sure they have changed (/make sure you add sources as appropriate, which I'm sure you do)
Imagery is ~1.5 year behind, which is useful for adding construction, but not for updating it.
check_date should be used for 'most recent' survey date, but it looks like 2024 mapillary is not uploaded here yet (may still be uploading); latest is from 2022.

Regards,

Daniel
mackerski (2024-04-10 13:21:12+00:00): Hi Daniel,
I could have been clearer with the source in the changeset - I edited the check_date based on Anne being on-site in the last hour and shooting a photo. I've been at this OSM game for rather a long time, so please understand that I'm mindful of the issues you note.
danieldegroot2 (2024-04-10 14:09:17+00:00): "on-site in the last hour and shooting a photo"
Sure. I can't find it on the Mapillary website just yet, but it's fine.
dpolovinkin (2026-07-16 16:47:10+00:00): hi, just wanted to mention that "Hidden garden (local living hostel)" is not the name of the hostel, it's "Hidden Garden" as it was before you changed it

don't change correct names of various POI like that plz
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-14 11:40:51+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11807097250/history has shop = textiles that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=textiles ? Is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=fabric describing this shop well? Is it intentional that shop=textiles, was used not shop=fabric? How it differs from it?
EneaSuper (2024-04-11 09:19:03+00:00): Ciao, dato che hai ampliato il parcheggio allora direi che è il caso di fare altrettanto anche con l'area del polo didattico 🙂
UtenteInteressato (2024-04-11 09:32:43+00:00): fatto
Leo Slager (2024-04-10 22:38:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-04-10 22:42:51+00:00): Hier gaat iets niet goed.
Playground is vast niet de naam van dit speeltuintje.
De juiste tag is leisure=playground.
En dan verschijnt er ook een symbool op de kaart.
Je kunt dat opzoeken in de wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:leisure

ik pas het even aan.
Leo Slager (2024-04-10 22:46:47+00:00): En dat wilde grasland is er natuurlijk ook niet. Het wordt natuurlijk netjes onderhouden en dus is landuse=grass de juiste tag.
Edser Broers (2024-04-11 06:51:11+00:00): dank voor de help kon de juiste tag niet vinden
bes199 (2024-04-12 09:36:29+00:00): Hallo Solut!on, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und danke für deine erste Änderung!

In einigen älteren Straßenfotos (2-4 Jahre) hieß es tatsächlich noch Darrwiesenweg, also super, dass du die Änderung bemerkt hast!

Viel Spaß beim Mappen!
Znaika (2024-08-23 17:17:57+00:00): Hallo Chris aus Ravensburg.
Kannst du das lösen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4398886
Gruß, 
Znaika
Emilius123 (2024-04-10 13:58:16+00:00): Wann mit Fahrrad auf Helgoland?
Kovoschiz (2024-04-10 14:37:02+00:00): Please don't upload test edits to a live public database. This is considered vandalism.
pesec (2024-04-11 08:05:58+00:00): Добрый день.
У вас ошибка в данных. Здание не может иметь имя точки выдачи товаров магазина, расположенного в нём.
Для этого указывается точка внутри здания.
DaanLT (2024-04-11 05:21:25+00:00): Labas, pagal naujesnes ESRI foto, Labanoro g. 14, pastatų čia jau nėra, kas ir buvo anksčiau sužymėta
ygcgjp5 (2024-04-12 09:02:58+00:00): Jūsų tiesa. Atsinaujino Vilniaus ortofoto, tai galvojau kad bus iš ties šviežios nuotraukos...
Vaidotas (2024-04-12 16:08:16+00:00): O kodėl nuėmėte išvažiavimo iš požeminio parkingo žymą https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10569747704 ?
ygcgjp5 (2024-04-12 21:02:26+00:00): Nes žyma yra skirta įvažiavimui, o ten yra išvažiavimas :-) Jeigu entrance žymą galime naudoti automatiškai rasti kelią į stovėjimo aikštelę, tai išvažiuojant ji neturi jokios prasmės.
ygcgjp5 (2024-04-13 06:51:47+00:00): Šiaip galime padiskutuoti, nenoriu primesti savų žymėjimų. Nors man atrodo jog nežymėti išvažiavimų yra logiška.
Vaidotas (2024-04-13 07:25:31+00:00): Paklausiau, nes Osmose pagauna tokį nepažymėtą išvažiavimą kaip klaidą: https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issues/open?item=1210&class=3&country=lithuania

Pritariu, kad žymos pavadinimas tiesiogiai reiškia tik įvažiavimą, bet ir wiki, ir iD redaktorius tokią žymą aprašo kaip tinkamą ir išvažiavimui pažymėti:
"Use amenity=parking_entrance to map a single parking entrance (and/or exit). "
ygcgjp5 (2024-04-13 18:00:16+00:00): OK, supratau.
Leo Slager (2024-04-10 23:04:41+00:00): Bij leisure=track komt de naam dan in het midden van de polygoon te staan.
Misschien beter om dat niet te doen ?

Up to you.
skyper (2024-04-10 14:30:28+00:00): Hi Danfost,
warum hast Du denn https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1167849792 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1167849789 zu einer Linie vereinigt? Ich hatte es bewusst getrennt, dass nur der nördliche Teil ein `placement=transition` hat, da dort die Lage nicht genau stimmt und die Winkel am nördlichen Ende nicht der Realität entsprechen.
Fragende Grüße,
skyper

P.S.: iD unterstützt bisher leider das Spurtagging nicht.
user_12500175 (2024-04-10 15:26:40+00:00): Uppps, das war ein Versehen, ich wollte da eigentlich garnichts am Way ändern, wegen Relationen und ID :-( , könntes du das bitte korrigieren
skyper (2024-04-10 15:37:10+00:00): Ok, kann passieren.
Wieder hergestellt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149826400
Viele Grüße,
skyper
user_12500175 (2024-04-11 08:54:44+00:00): Danke :-)
MarcoR (2024-04-20 12:54:58+00:00): Ciao! 

Conosci la zona? Io no ma a quanto ho capito il paese dovrebbe chiamarsi "Rasa di Varese" e solo popolarmente detto "Rasa" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/502872408); le voci Wikipedia/Wikidata non menzionano l'uso del solo "Rasa"; 

Ci sono 19 indirizzi addr:place=Rasa e 1 addr:place="Rasa di Varese"; inoltre alcune note di utenti anonimi chiedono di usare "Rasa di Varese", tipo questa: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3350028

Buon mapping,
Marco.
NeisBot (2024-04-10 14:04:02+00:00): Hello Peter_Otp, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-10 14:26:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in part or full.  If something is "private", then access tags should be used.  They should not just be deleted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149822738
geozeisig (2024-04-10 16:50:10+00:00): This type of trampoline should be tagged with playground=trampoline. And as you can see on
ttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:playground%3Dtrampoline
, trampoline should not to be mapped in private gardens. Also contradict the rule https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information
Allison P (2024-04-10 20:42:32+00:00): I don't think backyard trampolines should be mapped. You can move them around at any time. It's like a soccer goal, I'd think. In the same vein, you wouldn't map an inflatable pool, but we map in-ground and in-deck pools.
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-10 21:05:35+00:00): I was thinking of it as no different from a pool, which we would map.

But thinking about the portability side, I do concur it shouldn't be mapped.  I disagree on the "private" argument, but the portability, I 100% agree.

I am going to revert my revert.
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-10 21:07:24+00:00): I do request that better changeset comments be used to explain why they are being deleted, and not just "private."
gscholz (2024-04-23 06:34:38+00:00): Hi Grannymeg,
your recent edits have left behind a big amount of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-35.77814&lat=-8.23598&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-10 14:26:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in part or full.  If something is "private", then access tags should be used.  They should not just be deleted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149822738
Tjuro (2024-04-16 18:21:20+00:00): Beste Op 't rad,

Gebouwen worden geimporteerd vanuit het kadaster, als iets niet up to date is vraag dan een update aan op het forum.

Gelieve niet zelf gebouwen gaan aanpassen.
Op'tRad (2024-04-20 13:17:39+00:00): OK Het valt me wel op dat van gebouwen vaak alleen het grondplan getekend staat, niet wat er aan afdakken oversteekt. Zoiets is het hier wellicht ook. Er zal wel een kelder onder zitten.
user_17222985 (2024-04-21 15:12:11+00:00): на фіга забруднювати російською ?
ти сто відсотків російський раб або  зрадник України
Enock4seth (2024-05-06 22:51:16+00:00): Hi, I think the automated removal of names here without discussions is not helpful. 

It is usual for settlements or houses in these parts of Ghana to have names. 

Can you provide documentation for you are using to remove names? I understand you are using OSM Privacy standards without any further clarifications.
Enock4seth (2024-05-06 22:52:55+00:00): I would have expected that buildings within buildings also taken care of but your mechanical edits seems to very much overlook many real QAs
VLD316 (2024-05-08 16:27:28+00:00): Hello Enock4seth! Thank you for reaching out to me about this issue. I apologize for not reaching out to further discuss what the situation was in this area regarding the personal information on these buildings. I was following the guideline listed here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information on the OSM wiki about privacy standards. Would you recommend we revert these changes to include the names in this case? As far as the building QA issue, the project I was working with mainly involves tagging on the name tags, and if you'd like to know more of our editing processes you may find that here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Meta.

Thank you again for bringing this to my attention, and please feel free to reach out to me again with anymore questions, comments, or concerns!
nevw (2024-04-15 02:44:12+00:00): Hi, I have disconnected the wood from the roadway centreline here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149822305#map=17/-32.85279/149.78008
by convention land cover and use does not extend to the roadway centreline...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Areas_and_Ways_Sharing_Nodes
nevw (2024-04-15 02:53:23+00:00): Large mapped wooded areas often extend  extend across highways for efficiency and expediency but when mapping the edges along highways we try to map the wooded edge to the trees edge along the side of the road.
geozeisig (2024-04-10 16:51:20+00:00): This type of trampoline should be tagged with playground=trampoline. And as you can see on
ttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:playground%3Dtrampoline
, trampoline should not to be mapped in private gardens. Also contradict the rule https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-10 21:08:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in part or full.  Item is movable and after further discussion, I am wrong.  Portable features should not be mapped since they can move, however, just because it is "private" doesn't really mean it shouldn't be mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149839258
aceman444 (2025-05-07 13:44:51+00:00): Zdravim, takto sa ale parkoviska nerobia. Nie je potrebne kazdy rad parkovacich miest oznacit ako samostatne parkovisko s rovnakymi znackami. Predpokaldam, ze tam v skutocnosti nie je 10 parkovisk OC Idea, ale len jedno. Staci urobit jeden obrys. To vyznacenie miest pre vozickarov pomocou parking_space je OK.
Hodnota v znacke maxstay ma byt v anglictine, takze 2 hours.
aceman444 (2025-05-07 15:00:13+00:00): Taktiez prosim nenechavajte milimetrove medzery medzi objektami ako parkovisko a trava, ak medzi nimi uz nic nie je. Kludne mozu zdielat spolocne body a hrany, kde sa dotykaju.
demon_box (2024-04-10 16:51:44+00:00): Ciao, non si mappano i civici sull'intero edificio perchè in Italia definiscono soltanto la porta di accesso e non l'intero stabile che infatti potrebbe avere più accessi e di conseguenza più civici.
Se non si conosce esattamente la collocazione della porta di quel civico che stai mappando devi fare un nodo staccato ma adiacente all'edificio, GRAZIE
Procedo alle correzioni.
silversurfer83 (2024-04-10 22:57:33+00:00): Gude :)

find ich gut, dass du Hydranten und verwandte Objekte in die Datenbank einpflegst. Danke :)

Eine Frage: Woher stammen die Namen der hier eingetragenen Objekte?
Da die Eigenschaft "emergency=suction_point" die Stelle schon beschreibt ist ein Name, der das gleiche aussagt eigentlich nicht nötig.
Details zu Namen bei OSM hat das Wiki unter
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen

bei Fragen immer raus damit
und weiter viel Spaß an der Karte

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149823444
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-10 14:50:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11336900009

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
literan (2024-04-10 16:56:59+00:00): это не озерная улица, а разворот на ней