piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2025-10-20 09:04:55+00:00): Oke, maar de key barrier is er nu uit.
Dat klopte niet. 
Denk dat het toch in barrier=...   kan zitten. 
Het hoorde een traffic_calming te zijn...  Maar wellicht geeft dat in LiveNav ook strafpunten.
Het is een beetje een kruising tussen een choker en een table.
Wanneer de update in LiveNav is doorgevoerd zou het nog een keer kunnen uittesten. 
Gr eggie
OSPRvB (2025-10-20 09:13:33+00:00): Eggie, Bedankt voor de support. Ik zal het later nog eens bekijken. 
Groet
Yog Sot (2025-10-21 10:30:26+00:00): tak jak piesi mogą chodzić po jezdniach, tak mogą również po drogach rowerowych w przypadku gdy droga nie ma chodnika
Kubolsky (2025-10-21 10:43:54+00:00): Chodnik jak najbardziej jest, natomiast droga rowerowa częściowo się z nim przecina co widać. spowodowane jest to tym, że na chodniku są stopnie
Yog Sot (2025-11-10 21:12:59+00:00): chodzi o to, że pas drogowy w której jest ta droga rowerowa nie ma chodnika. To, że chodnik jest gdzieś indziej w innym przebiegu nie ma znaczenia. Dodatkowo jeśli ten chodnik gdzies tam nie jest oznakowany znakiem "droga dla pieszych" mogą nim jeździć również rowery jak na każdej alejce parkowe, no chyba, ze regulamin parku tego zabrania faktycznie. 
Tak mamy przepisy generalnie i sory, ze tak późno odpisuje
wwjd2022 (2025-10-20 11:04:51+00:00): I revert the changeset as some changes are flawed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173530660
RobotFK (2025-10-20 08:54:57+00:00): Keine Notes als Quelle, sondern luftbild -_-
fndoder (2025-10-20 14:43:14+00:00): АНО ДО Оранжевое Чудо - это не название (name) точки, а название юрлица (тег operator).

Я перенес его в этот тег, оставив в качестве name просто "Оранжевое Чудо", как и было ранее.
joost schouppe (2025-11-20 14:14:38+00:00): Waarom heb je deze niet met replace geometry gedaan? Dan behoud je de geschiedenis. Je bent hier ook shop=mall verloren, volgens mij onterecht - er zijn meerdere winkels die je zonder naar buiten te gaan kunt bereiken.
ThiloForGeo (2025-10-20 09:52:22+00:00): Ich weiß nicht, wo und wie ich Way: 321019880 geändert habe. Es fällt mir schwer einen Vergleich von Vorher und Nachher zu finden.
Filip009 (2026-02-24 20:18:04+00:00): Ahoj, neotagovaná cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443439302
segi (2026-02-24 20:21:52+00:00): díki, opravené.
jimkats (2026-02-25 15:07:44+00:00): Hi, why did you changed the road in the river near Malamata ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351697449 ) from unclassified to service? I know it's a dangerous path due to it going through the constant waterflow, but it's a path used apparently by many people in the area. Even if you wanted to deprioritize it from the routers usage, making it "service" road is just untrue.
kiwi75 (2026-02-26 06:06:10+00:00): Hi, this is indeed the reason. It's a dangerous path that is not always open to traffic due to the river, and has no official markings or traffic signs. To me it makes sense that drivers are not routed through that road to go eg from Xiropigado to Malamata.
Alternatively, we could change it back to unclassified and add some conditions (eg closed during winter)
kartler175 (2025-10-21 11:03:10+00:00): Das geht auf das Konto von ID, das offene ways,  getagged als boundary=postal_code zu Polygonen schließt. Siehe https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ungefragte-autokorrektur-durch-id/132903
jbcharron (2025-11-23 17:21:18+00:00): Hello Ronaldo,
Welcome to the OpenStreetMap community.
We have remove some places and name which you have added because, your edits doesn't respect rules of the community, you can find rules about name here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Good_practice
JB
bxl-forever (2025-10-20 11:10:15+00:00): Hello, and welcome back.

It looks like you typed the address of the building onto the place by mistake.

We don’t need to write the addresses on multiple places.  A clean database mandates that addresses are only written once (on the container building or on an address point).

Adding the website of a business is okay, but not the street address.  I fixed this.
Iorvethe (2025-10-20 11:23:01+00:00): Hi, thank you for the warm welcome!

Your remark makes total sense to me ; thanks for accompanying correction. I will keep this in mind for future modifications.

Unrelated, but just 10 min ago I was looking into your profile and being amazed at your commitment to mapping Brussels. Thank you for all your efforts!
Robert Whittaker (2026-07-02 10:38:02+00:00): In this changeset you added some accessibility info to the toilets at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2345013392 .

However, the OSM object is tagged with both amenity=toilets and disused:amenity=toilets. Do you know that the toilets were definitely open again when you made the edit? If so, it would be good to remove the disused:amenity=toilets tag.
mueschel (2025-10-21 09:38:37+00:00): Hi,
you used a new tag here:
wikimaginot = https://wikimaginot.eu/V70_construction_detail.php?id=10461

It would be better to have it in a common 'url' or 'ref' tag, e.g. 

ref:wikimaginot = 10461

url = https://wikimaginot.eu/V70_construction_detail.php?id=10461
Arflha (2025-10-21 09:52:03+00:00): ref:wikimaginot seems the most appropriate, isn't it ?

How can I ask for the ref:wikimaginot to provide a link with the tag id in a similar way as other ref:tags do ?
mueschel (2025-10-21 09:59:01+00:00): This is done by an entry in the Wiki. Here's a brief description of how it works:
https://github.com/JOSM/tag2link/#tag2link
Arflha (2025-10-21 10:29:50+00:00): Thanks, I'll add it !
Arflha (2025-10-21 10:34:34+00:00): Shift from wikimaginot url to ref:wikimaginot is done ;-)
TheNightRider (2025-10-20 10:38:35+00:00): Oops, I meant updated the name to Sunrise Road, not what it was before (Sunset Drive).
jimkats (2026-05-24 21:23:17+00:00): Somehow this edit removed several tags from "Ιερά Μητρόπολη Αργολίδας", the administrative building of the local bishop, and added a shop=clothes tag which doesn't make any sense.

What did you select in StreetComplete when the quest asked you if this still exists?
jimkats (2026-05-24 21:26:31+00:00): I saw your later edits about "Enisa Boutique", which is the nearby street "Θεσσαλονίκης". I assume you accidentally assumed that was the place you selected.
berndw (2025-10-20 12:02:23+00:00): Hier gab es wohl einen Tippfehler, in Rengsdorf fährt der Bus 117 ;-)

Der wird erfasst
berndw (2025-10-20 12:07:12+00:00): https://www.vrminfo.de/fileadmin/data/pdf/fahrplanbuecher/2025/117_2025-08-18.pdf
JPhoenix11 (2025-10-20 14:03:24+00:00): Hej, är det verkligen lämpligt att ha med något som planeras vara klart om 15 år, och som inte börjat byggas än?
Peuxy (2025-10-20 14:56:04+00:00): Det ska vara 2029, dvs om 4 år. Se ”När sker planering och byggande” på https://goteborg.se/wps/portal/start/goteborg-vaxer/hitta-projekt/stadsomrade-hisingen/brunnsbo/brunnsbo---linn%C3%A9-via-lindholmen/brunnsbo---hjalmar-brantingsplatsen.
wombatmaper (2025-10-21 00:06:21+00:00): Detta har raderats av archie, utan diskussion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173539410
wombatmaper (2025-10-21 00:11:56+00:00): Jag anser att detta helt klart förtjänar att kartläggas. Denna gren är uppenbarligen planerad och kommer att byggas, och många relaterade projekt är redan under uppbyggnad. Byggprojekten har redan påbörjats.
archie (2025-10-21 05:15:28+00:00): 1. Verifierbarhet är den centrala principen för osm. I det här fallet finns ingenting som kan verifieras. Planeringsutkast och dryftande av idéer hör inte hemma på en karttjänst som osm. 
2. Lindholmsförbindelsen förutsätter att det finns en tunnel under älven som inte finns idag och som det är osäkert om den någonsin kommer att finnas. 
3. Det rör sig om ett planeringsutkast, som vi berörda invånare i staden får ta ställning till, inte ett förslag. 
4. För något år sedan fanns det ett "förslag" om att bygga en linbana från Lindholmen till andra sidan älven. Även här ritades detta "förslag" in i osm så snart meddelandet därom dök upp på kommunens webplats. Detta "förslag" är numera helt obsolet och ingen talar mer om detta. Ett fantasiprojekt som möjligtvis även Lindholmsförbindelsen.
Peuxy (2025-10-21 05:35:29+00:00): Wikin nämner inget om vad och vad som inte får representeras. I högsta grad frå information som inte är verifierbar inte punliceras men dessa baserar sig på kartor tagna från stadskontoret.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed, "Planning Phases
For more specific description of the planning phase it would be necessary to invent an additional tag, because not all plans are realized, hence describing the probability for a proposed project to be realized. Please add documentation here in the future."
Peuxy (2025-10-21 05:52:14+00:00): Påståenden från verifierbarhet tagna ur "https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability":

När man får lägga till:
- "There is information on the site about future construction, but construction has not yet begun" - Sant, det är verifierbart, godkänd pågående detaljplan och är tagna från exploateringsnämnden.

- "The first construction work on the site has already begun, but there is no track of a road or rail yet, but the exact course of the route has already been determined in the project" - Sant, bussgata är delvis redan färdigställd och byggs om enligt exploateringsnämnden vid färdigställande tills 2029.

https://goteborg.se/wps/portal/start/goteborg-vaxer/hitta-projekt/stadsomrade-hisingen/brunnsbo/brunnsbo---linn%C3%A9-via-lindholmen/brunnsbo---hjalmar-brantingsplatsen

Jag är mycket villig om att debattera detta om lindholmsförbindelsen med eftersom det skedet med detaljarbetet och framtagande av bygghandlingar redan är startat hos kommunen.

https://goteborg.se/wps/portal/start/goteborg-vaxer/hitta-projekt/stadsomrade-hisingen/brunnsbo/brunnsbo---linn%C3%A9-via-lindholmen/lindholmsforbindelsen/tidplan-for-lindholmen---linn%C3%A9platsen
archie (2025-10-21 06:29:14+00:00): Vad gäller Lindholmsförbindelsen (spårvagnslinje under älven genom en tunnel som inte finns): På stadens webplats finns förvaltningens planeringsförslag med kartor m m. Det finns inget politiskt beslut om det här och förvaltningens utredningsarbete utmynnar inte alltid i beslut i enlighet med planeringsförslaget. Exemplet med linbaneförslaget som aldrig blev verklighet borde vara ett varnande exempel. Som jag förstår det så är osm inte en spegling av stadsförvaltningens utredningsarbete eller dess webplats.
AndyB_66 (2025-10-20 16:15:58+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
user_5359 (2025-10-22 08:25:10+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/5903396746. What is the mean of the key uic? Did you mean uic_ref?
donovaly (2025-10-26 23:59:19+00:00): Yes, I meant uic_ref. Thanks for your fix.
JJIglesias (2025-10-20 18:10:02+00:00): Saludos, ese numero de F50 en la Etiqueta Ref, de donde sale?

De una via Departamental como la D4217 NO se origina un via Fundamental de la RVF, de una via Fundamental si se originan Vias Departamentales (D) pero no Reves.

Por favor clarificar con referencias especificas, sino por favor borrar esa Referencia Incorrecta.

Gracias
JJ
ilias_ (2025-10-20 14:02:46+00:00): It's Continentale not Continetale
Youness_ss (2025-10-21 09:44:21+00:00): Thank you for correcting my mistake
mavl (2025-11-15 10:55:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
aaronq227 (2025-10-29 13:57:07+00:00): Hi empty_child,

I noticed you added dashes “-“ in ref tags with the comment “Highway names normalization”. The OSM wiki for road tagging in Georgia seems to indicate that the ref format should be შ[number] (without a dash), which aligns with how it is typically seen formatted in OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Road_Tagging_in_Georgia). The typical procedure for ref formatting is to “tag what's on the ground” as formatted on road signage (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref). Would you be able to share any resources or imagery of road signage used to make these edits? 

Thank you for your time and I look forward to hearing from you.
empty_child (2025-10-29 20:25:18+00:00): Hello aaronq227,
I see, some crap happened. I used the official governmental road sheet as a primary entry point where they're marked like "შ-123" (not the latest version - https://www.matsne.gov.ge/ka/document/download/5524325/0/1), but on road signs, refs are shown like "შ 123". I'll revise my changes later based on how it's shown on signs.
empty_child (2025-10-30 14:17:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173978950
aaronq227 (2025-10-31 19:34:29+00:00): Hi empty_child,

Thank you for responding and making updates to the ref tags. 

Have a great day!
Dimitar155 (2025-10-20 20:11:01+00:00): Здравейте,

recycling:glass се отнася до всякакво стъкло (вкл. посуда, стъклопакети и стъклени плафони). В действителност се приемат само буркани и стъклени бутилки. Би трябва да го пише и върху зеления контейнер.

"Електроснабдяване София" е вероятно вече бивш оператор на подстанциите. Към днешна дата би следвало да е ЕРМ Запад, което се отбелязва в в полето за оператор, не в името.

Отново ще помоля да съкратите коментарите и те реално да описват промените. "добавени, променени или изтрити...." се отнася за абсолютна всяка промяна, по-важното е какво конкретно е направено. Например "добавен оператор", "добавени кофи" и т.н. За справка - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bg:Good_changeset_comments

Поздрави,
Митко
Marek-M (2025-10-21 06:25:46+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tej nazwy?
mueschel (2025-10-23 10:24:58+00:00): Hi,
what does 'capacity:pe' mean? It's not used in any other place.
qrisztly (2025-10-23 19:35:39+00:00): Sounds like a typo. Exactly where did you find it? I'll investigate and fix it tomorrow.
mueschel (2025-10-23 19:43:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366889135
qrisztly (2025-10-23 20:39:49+00:00): 'population equivalents'. We use it to design sewage plant capacity. But you're right, it doesn't seem to be documented in osm and it looks like it's barely used at all. For now I'll delete it while I dig out some 'cubic meter/day' numbers in stead. I believe m3/d is the usual unit when tagging wastewater facilities in osm, but I'll be sure to check up on it. Thanks for letting me know.
Marek-M (2025-10-21 06:31:55+00:00): Jakie jest źródło informacji o tym miejscu?
eggie (2025-10-20 12:09:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Marek-M (2025-10-21 06:32:05+00:00): Jakie jest źródło informacji o tym miejscu?
Marek-M (2025-10-21 06:32:14+00:00): Jakie jest źródło informacji o tym miejscu?
Marek-M (2025-10-21 06:26:03+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tej nazwy?
Luzandro (2025-10-28 11:33:47+00:00): zwei der neuen bare_rock Flächen waren nicht geschlossen

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5025969
mueschel (2025-10-21 09:25:34+00:00): Hi,
you used several "waste:xyz" tags here that are not used in any other places. Please have a look to the common tags which are "recycling:xyz":
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=recycling?uselang=de
Eggyn0mus (2025-10-21 10:43:44+00:00): will fix that thanks
tux67 (2025-10-20 12:22:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173533919
SomeoneElse (2025-10-28 21:19:38+00:00): Hello,
You've moved the tags for "The Range" from the wider area to the building, but the forgets that the garden centre to the south is also part of the shop.  To fix it it's probably easiest just to revert your edit.
Best Regards,
Andy
NeisBot (2025-10-20 12:36:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-20 12:36:43+00:00): Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Law firm in Brisbane"
NeisReview (2025-10-22 15:50:29+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173634914
AndyB_66 (2025-10-20 16:15:48+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
NeisBot (2025-10-20 12:45:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-20 12:45:41+00:00): Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Cleaning services in Westlake Ohio"
NeisReview (2025-10-22 15:49:57+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173553824
empty_child (2025-10-21 09:14:34+00:00): Hello Temo,
Please, check page about admin_level in Georgia (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Administrative_divisions_of_Georgia). We use 10 level for cities' districts, not for cities in general
empty_child (2025-10-21 22:21:33+00:00): Sounds reasonable. Well, maybe in this case it's unnecessary to mark subunits as admin_level at all. I'll ask in the community's chat to finalize a proper solution for this point.
Temo_Kuntchulia (2025-10-22 00:05:43+00:00): I would suggest keeping those. Settlements in the same administrative units still have their own separate official boundaries (this is even directly mentioned in the ordinance I linked above).

They also have separate addresses and street names (I plan to add some of these in the future) - for example, different sections of შ-208 road are registered as different streets in Nigoiti (Aghmashenebeli str), Cholobargi (Rustaveli str), Chkonagora (Pirtskhalaishvili str), Kviani (Tsuladze str) and Japana (Guria str); despite the fact that they are all part of the same Nigoiti administrative unit.

Additionally, municipal governments sometimes introduce separate regulations/policies/services to separate settlements in the same administrative units. For example village of Grigoleti has an official status of a resort, despite being officially included in Supsa administrative unit with other settlements. (Grigoleti is currently marked on the map with level 8 borders; however this is incorrect [I haven't gone to that section of the map yet]).

As far that I'm aware all the other rural municipalities in Georgia are structured this way: municipalities consisting of administrative units, which in turn are made up of one or multiple settlements (depending on population, geography and/or history).
Temo_Kuntchulia (2025-10-22 00:26:02+00:00): P.S: Aside from municipal governments, the central government also often treats settlements in the same administrative units as separate entities (for example, through road names and road signs).
empty_child (2025-10-22 10:06:49+00:00): Preliminary, some members approved your position. Let's leave your option for now; it looks like the right approach for rural areas. From my side, I only wanted to clarify your understanding of admin_level logic, and you correctly extrapolated it (and well, nobody earlier implemented such detailed logic; countless things are not ready yet). I also had an idea of implementing religious boundaries, but it's a future task.
foreigner037 (2025-10-22 07:38:58+00:00): Hi,

please keep the changesets smaller.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Anonymous36863 (2025-10-23 10:25:12+00:00): ОК
eggie (2025-10-20 13:29:17+00:00): Bste terual.. Wanneer een bedrijf verhuist zal de adresnode intact moeten blijven.
Nu missen  we een adresnode en op de nieuwe locatie hebben we twee identieke adressen.

MVG
eggie
terual (2025-10-20 13:34:01+00:00): Helder. Dank voor het terugdraaien.
eggie (2025-10-20 13:38:44+00:00): Hoi,....  Ik heb niets teruggedraaid.
Wel de oude adreslocatie hersteld.

Op de nieuwe  locatie bevond zich geen adresnode 42?
Alle adresnodes zijn import vanuit de BAG. 

MVG
eggie
APneunzehn74 (2025-10-21 18:48:26+00:00): Hallo Stefan, ein Track mit verdichteter Oberfläche ist im OSM Sinne ein tracktye grade2, oder höher. Ein tracktye grade1 sollte asphaltiert, betoniert oder gepflastert sein. 
Ich hab den Weg bereits korrigiert.
Grüße Andreas
Stefan Menacher (2025-10-21 19:32:04+00:00): Servus, 
vielen Dank für den Hinweis und die Korrektur.
Grüße,
Stefan
Frans S (2025-10-20 13:08:24+00:00): Thanks for mapping.
Please do not connect nodes of a building to a highway.
Best regards and keep mapping
foersterp (2025-10-22 06:57:22+00:00): name-Tag am "Rettungsschwimmer-Häuschen": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name
Oder steht das genau so am Gebäude?
Frans S (2025-11-13 11:16:55+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You removed tags from this road which were tagged since 2011 as a path.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124037429/history#map=18/31.796394/130.673314
Now, you can see clearly that it is a normal road, paved, and should be retagged to highway=unclassified.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-11-13 11:20:37+00:00): Hi again.  
Please do not add a layer to a building to avoid an error. Just adjust the situation.
Best regards
Arflha (2025-10-20 13:24:20+00:00): Salut,
Concernant le 74-78 rue du Général de Gaulle à Dampremy, ce n'est pas une bonne pratique de diviser arbitrairement une maison en 4 pour avoir des numéros dissociés, tu peux très bien laisser en addr:house 74;74A;76;78 ça ne pose pas de soucis.
Amicalement
Arflha (2025-10-20 13:26:09+00:00): Par contre, si les entrées sont dissociées (l'une 72, l'autre 74...), tu peux mettre un point avec entrance=main ou yes et l'adresse sur ce point.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Adresses#B%C3%A2timents_avec_plusieurs_num%C3%A9ros_d'adresses
Hufkratzer (2025-10-20 21:34:16+00:00): Hi,
Area 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443480197 is far too small to be an equestrian center; it is probably a lunging circle, and these are normally tagged like riding areas: leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian. In JOSM, you can do this with the preset for sport=equestrian. Compare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
Reino Baptista (2025-10-21 06:03:17+00:00): Dear Hufkratzer,

Thanks for the helpful tip;  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
trial (2025-10-22 21:43:14+00:00): Bonjour, du coup est-ce que le fixme demandant une position précis n'est pas devenu inutile ?
trial (2025-10-22 21:43:26+00:00): *précise*
Szymson (2025-10-20 17:40:38+00:00): Że co? Smutny trollu, miejscami jeszcze nawet kruszywa nie ma na trasie głównej a Ty chcesz to otwierać? Jak? Po błocie auta mają jeździć? Wielkie XD
user_21741990 (2025-10-23 10:03:13+00:00): Źródła mówiły o otwarciu "połączenia DK20 z DK7 w Lniskach". Skąd miałem wiedzieć, że chodzi o coś innego niż o obwodnicę.
Szymson (2025-10-23 14:47:24+00:00): No to może warto by zajrzeć na stronę kontraktu, upewnić się co się dzieje w terenie, jakieś nagrania z drona obejrzeć z tej budowy, a nie zmieniać na pałę?
mavl (2025-11-15 10:55:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2025-11-15 10:55:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
SekeRob (2025-10-21 10:04:12+00:00): Hi,

Please note, again, ANNCSU is STILL an illegal source PLUS. There's a corner sign that says Via per Popoli which is used also by addresses along that road. Will be reverted!

ciao