piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2024-07-18 19:46:08+00:00): You used older imagery to add these buildings. The situation has changed drastically since the images you see in bing; entire settlements are present in some imageries but not others. 

Alternate imageries can be useful, but you should check and be confdent that the features you're adding are present in the most recent imagery. Start by refering to the project instructions when choosing what imagery to reference. If you later find that you have made a mistake try to fix it, or state it in the comments section of tasks; it's helpful for others contributing to the project.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152850117
rskedgell (2024-07-24 09:55:33+00:00): Deleting all this information doesn't help routing for the busmiles snap to roads feature.

Reverted.
Gregory Peony (2024-07-15 23:42:26+00:00): The flagged footprints attempts to outline 2 buildings **not** one. That's why the shape seems so unique. 

Press q to square corners.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152850173
Gregory Peony (2024-07-15 23:40:52+00:00): Press q to square corners.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152850203
rskedgell (2024-07-24 09:46:36+00:00): Erasing the name, surface, speed limit and street lighting information from Corporation Street would have had no influence on the router used for the busmiles snap to highway feature. I would have had adverse effects for all other OSM data consumers.

Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154341209
miluethi (2024-06-18 16:21:08+00:00): Hi Choc,

Please square out all your OSM buildings. 

Thank you.
Gregory Peony (2024-07-15 23:40:32+00:00): Press q to square corners.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152850363
rskedgell (2024-07-24 09:41:42+00:00): There was no need to delete almost all the tags from that section of Oxford Street. Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154340980

I've added a note and a fixme for a local mapper to check whether this is now two way for all vehicles, or just for buses.
Gregory Peony (2024-07-15 23:39:43+00:00): The flagged buildings have been mapped with 5 nodes. 

Press q to square corners.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152850518
chris66 (2024-06-18 21:35:44+00:00): revertiert.
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-18 22:31:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152868366 where the changeset comment is: Großflächige Löschung von Waldwegen revertiert. Bitte, wie in Changeset-Diskussionen angeregt, access-Tags verwenden.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-17 08:21:58+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11990197688/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
LuisAlfredo92 (2025-04-17 16:33:24+00:00): Hello, it's a shop where they sell donuts and frappes mainly

It looks like it's shop:food, but I was looking for something more specific since they're desserts
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-17 17:13:31+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfast_food + one of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-17 17:14:06+00:00): (if they sell things that you eat immediately)

or maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dpastry ?
LuisAlfredo92 (2025-04-17 20:50:19+00:00): I think it'd be shop=pastry, because although they aren't in exhibition, you ask for the donuts and drinks and you can eat them immediately (and you should or they will melt)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-15 22:07:53+00:00): changed it then!
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-18 22:31:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152868366 where the changeset comment is: Großflächige Löschung von Waldwegen revertiert. Bitte, wie in Changeset-Diskussionen angeregt, access-Tags verwenden.
chris66 (2024-06-18 21:34:43+00:00): revertiert.
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-18 22:31:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152868366 where the changeset comment is: Großflächige Löschung von Waldwegen revertiert. Bitte, wie in Changeset-Diskussionen angeregt, access-Tags verwenden.
Leo Slager (2024-06-18 22:36:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-06-18 22:36:56+00:00): Hallo Niek,
OpenStreetMap is geen advertentie medium.
Je bijdrage zal verwijderd worden.
tguen (2025-02-15 01:25:21+00:00): According to Bing Streetside imagery, this hotel is signed only as Hilton, and the name tag should match. Please fix.
Alena1308 (2025-02-18 09:11:23+00:00): fixed
Gregory Peony (2024-07-15 23:38:35+00:00): The features I flagged are mapped with five sides. This is not a common building shape and more likely looks like that becuase it is distorted in the aerial imagery.

Press q to square corners.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152850781
Gregory Peony (2024-07-18 19:59:56+00:00): You correctly identified all, but perhaps one building, just in older imagery. Generally the buildings you added are oversized, though you appear to have circularized them. This oversizing seems to have led to overlapping building footprints which I flagged. The footprints share a node, and it appears that your cursor likely snapped to it while mapping an adjacent building press 'h' or '?' in iD editor to reference the shortcuts and keybinds one will prevent your cursor from snapping to nodes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152850833
Gregory Peony (2024-07-15 23:36:29+00:00): The flagged features have been mapped with common nodes. Please avoid doing this unless you are sure that the buildigs share a common wall or node, because it makes them harder to edit. 

Press q to square corners.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152850936
Gregory Peony (2024-07-18 21:05:23+00:00): The outer building footprints are too large, the middle one is far more accurate. At least the northern two builddings are square, not circular. Perhaps counterintuatively, zooming out to the imagery's native resolution will usually make some features easier to determine.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152850972
Gregory Peony (2024-07-15 23:34:15+00:00): The flagged feature is mapped as triangular when it should be a quadrilateral. Press q to square corners.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152851123
chris66 (2024-06-18 21:32:36+00:00): revertiert.
chris66 (2024-06-18 21:31:51+00:00): Vandalismus revertiert.
Hufkratzer (2024-06-19 20:16:41+00:00): Hi,
I think you have choosen the wrong tag for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1293437307. This area does not look like a riding centre (tag leisure=horse_riding), it looks like a riding arena, similar to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/621483354. In OSM riding arenas are usually tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian and iD has a preset for them. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aleisure=horse_riding
Gregory Peony (2024-07-15 23:31:47+00:00): Please press q when mapping buildings with square corners (most buildings that aren't round.

When mapping in ID editor use the following process;

1. Accurately place area nodes
2. Finish drawing the area 
3. Tag it as a building
4. Press q to square the footprint 
5. Repeat
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152851405
flohoff (2024-06-18 18:27:10+00:00): Moin,
ich nehme an das du die Waldwege gelöscht hast weil die nicht betreten werden dürfen. So funktioniert OSM nicht. Wir mappen auch wege die nicht betreten werden dürfen und markieren die entsprechend.

Flo
FraukeLeo (2024-06-18 20:39:52+00:00): So ist es. Bitte das Löschen unterlassen. Vorhandene Wege können auf jeden Fall erfasst werden. Wenn sie nicht betreten werden dürfen (und das auch deutlich dransteht), werden sie in den OSM-Daten entsprechend gekennzeichnet, dann kann dem Verbot von allen Auswertern entsprochen werden.

Nebenbei bezweifle ich, dass hier so viele Wege "Waldweg" heißen. Ins name-Tag gehört wirklich nur der Eigenname des Weges, wenn er einen hat.
Gregory Peony (2024-07-15 23:31:38+00:00): Please press q when mapping buildings with square corners (most buildings that aren't round.

When mapping in ID editor use the following process;

1. Accurately place area nodes
2. Finish drawing the area 
3. Tag it as a building
4. Press q to square the footprint 
5. Repeat
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152851611
flohoff (2024-06-18 18:29:09+00:00): Diesen Changeset habe ich komplett reverted.

Du hast hier auch einen Teil der Landstraße gelöscht was massive Routingprobleme zur Folge hatte.

Z.b. die hier - Rot alt - Grün Neu.

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=717397,789421#

Flo
Frans S (2024-06-18 15:27:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
You mapped many trees as a building.
Round huts show mostly an earth / yellow/brown colored object.
Round green objects are trees. (like a Cauliflower)
Best regards
Frans S (2024-06-18 15:28:18+00:00): Take a look on Google earth on this location
9.006863599999999 30.702401549999998

Copy paste this in the search field.
Best regards
Frans S (2024-06-18 16:45:53+00:00): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EJX2FZNnpRnVQluLi62YMQ1ObnQr1uj9/view?usp=sharing
Please take a look on this image
Best regards
Leo Slager (2024-06-18 22:40:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-06-18 22:43:55+00:00): feedback:
Soms is het beter om disused:highway=....
te gebruiken.
Dat voorkomt dat iemand vanaf een luchtfoto het pad weer op de kaart zet.
steltloper76 (2024-06-19 05:16:22+00:00): Hoi Leo, na de wijzigingen vroeg ik me af hoe natuurbeheerorganisaties met OpenStreetMap omgaan, en toen las ik  inderdaad een discussie daarover waarin deze suggestie ook werd gedaan.

Ik zal die optie een volgende keer overwegen.
danieldegroot2 (2024-06-24 11:30:38+00:00): Added lifecycle prefix in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153107778
Frans S (2024-06-18 14:52:09+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Please get yourself familiar with understanding what buildings are and looks likes. Here, in wetland, you will hardly see buildings. Look also for paths .
leading to it.
Always map buildings as individual building. Not as a name, group of buildings. 
Please follow the tagging instructions.
Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152851745
hatul (2024-09-16 13:42:39+00:00): תודה על התרומה אבל התיאור מועתק מאתר קק"ל ומפר זכויות יוצרים. אסור להעתיק מידע מאתרים אחרים בלי אישור מהם.
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-10 13:01:16+00:00): It appears Chewy_2 is not responsive to changeset comments. I'll try to send them a private message.
hatul (2025-05-11 10:30:11+00:00): I deleted it
Chewy_2 (2026-04-30 06:43:45+00:00): So sorry, I just realized I had unread messages. I didn't get an alert. I'll make sure to follow this rule next time!
EneaSuper (2024-06-18 18:56:58+00:00): Chiedo scusa, qui invece pare che la denominazione sia stata eliminata correttamente 😅

Volevo invece portare la tua attenzione sull'elemento di cui sotto: ho visto che hai spostato il tragitto del Rio Fulle ma, da abitante della zona, posso assicurarti che il tragitto prima di sfociare nel fiume è proprio quello precedente alla tua modifica.

Fammi sapere 🙂

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369496915
granpasso811 (2024-06-19 06:51:44+00:00): Ciao, vedi la risposta all'altro tuo commento.
Se hai informazioni migliori correggi pure, io mi sono basato sui dati ufficiali della regione e sto inserendo km di rete idrografica, in val Polcevera non c'era quasi nulla a parti i corsi principali.
EneaSuper (2024-06-19 13:07:56+00:00): Ho letto entrambe le risposte, tutto chiaro 🙂

Allora va bene, poi correggerò, grazie per i chiarimenti!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-18 14:40:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11990260597

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Gregory Peony (2024-07-15 23:31:22+00:00): Please press q when mapping buildings with square corners (most buildings that aren't round.

When mapping in ID editor use the following process;

1. Accurately place area nodes
2. Finish drawing the area 
3. Tag it as a building
4. Press q to square the footprint 
5. Repeat
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152852049
chris66 (2024-06-18 21:36:53+00:00): revertiert.
literan (2024-06-18 18:06:30+00:00): не надо добавлять тег addr:city
Gregory Peony (2024-07-15 23:31:16+00:00): Please press q when mapping buildings with square corners (most buildings that aren't round.

When mapping in ID editor use the following process;

1. Accurately place area nodes
2. Finish drawing the area 
3. Tag it as a building
4. Press q to square the footprint 
5. Repeat
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152852243
silversurfer83 (2024-06-18 18:51:36+00:00): Moin

Bitte unterlasse das Löschen von Wegen. Wenn sie nicht betreten werden dürfen nutze bitte "access=no". Gelöscht wird nur, was nicht mehr da ist. 

Silversurfer83
DD1GJ (2024-06-18 20:35:17+00:00): Hallo, um welches Schutzgebiet handelt es sich hier? Das NSG liesner Wald ist nebenan.

Die OSM-Community unterstützt gerne die Belage des Naturschutzes, erwartet aber bei so massiven Löschungen volle Transparenz anstatt eines nichtssagenden Pseudonyms. Ergänze bitte innerhalb von 3 Tagen das Profil des Benutzeraccount um überprüfbare Angabe zur Identität der Behörde oder Organisation, wie z.B. bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Nationalpark%20S%C3%A4chsische%20Schweiz

Zudem sind solche Löschungen tabu. Es gibt Zugangsbeschränkungen bzw. Lebenszyklus:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix
Frans S (2024-06-18 14:58:54+00:00): Hello.  A building as a triangle is never seen here.
Please map them correctly as the footprint shows.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152852559
felipeeugenio (2024-06-18 22:13:59+00:00): Hola. Las de los parques estaban bien dibujadas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152852831
Syl (2024-06-18 15:37:28+00:00): Bonjour, je viens de corriger et de mettre à jour le camping, l'attribut de nom utilisé n'était pas le bon et tous les moyens de contact avaient également changés.
literan (2024-06-27 17:55:32+00:00): откат
Supaplex (2024-06-21 07:38:33+00:00): 你更動的部分都有在地共識去命名
詳情請參閱 osm Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152853393
aTarom (2024-06-19 05:38:14+00:00): Hola, he retirado este tag
"addr"="city"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11990368569/history
se trata de información real? disculpa la brevedad y el no tener tiempo para ponerme a buscar, si hay cualquier dificultad con los primeros pasos, no dudes en preguntar por aquí mismo o en los canales de la comunidad
https://t.me/OSMmadrid
o
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51
Saludos
danieldegroot2 (2024-06-24 11:31:02+00:00): Added lifecycle prefix in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153107854
infeeeee (2024-06-21 11:07:39+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

A forrásként megadott BFK-s prezi nem tudom mennyire releváns, tekintve, hogy a BFK már megszűnt több mint két éve. Ha valaha megépül ez az összekötés ki tudja hogyan fog ténylegesen megvalósulni.

Másik, ezeket a dolgokat nem biztos, hogy itt kéne tárolni az OpenStreetMapen, mivel nem lehet őket látni a helyszínen. Az OSM egyik alapelve a ellenőrizhetőség, azaz csak azt térképezzük, amit egy helyszínen levő ember láthat, ezek meg nem azok.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability

Én nem fogom törölni a rajzaidat, mert lehet, hogy egyszer majd a távoli jövőben megépülnek, de mivel nem felelnek meg ennek a kritériumnak, ezért más jogosan dönthet  úgy, hogy nem ide valók, ebben az esetben ne lepődj majd meg.

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
Supaplex (2024-06-21 07:38:08+00:00): 你更動的部分都有來源依據，例如海洋委員會公佈的金門地區限制水域範圍
詳情請參閱 osm Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152854156
akimapbuilder (2024-06-19 07:03:05+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since there is no road in sight.
Herman Lee (2024-06-19 08:17:45+00:00): 本修改集将退回
1. 岛屿“小立鹤岛”名称为“小立鹤岛”，其名称中不含“浙江省”三字。
2. way 1055134381指福建省设立的“福建省星仔列岛省级海洋特别保护区”，浙江省并未设立所谓“浙江省星仔列岛省级海洋特别保护区”。
Herman Lee (2024-06-19 08:22:14+00:00): 已部分退回，见www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152882057
akimapbuilder (2024-06-19 07:05:03+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since there is no building in sight.
Jakka (2024-06-19 19:39:18+00:00): dit lijkt een foute name tag.
Nu is dit een beschrijving en locatie in naam vervat wat fout is.
"Dobber | Suppen & Kajakken in de Blaarmeersen"
b-jazz (2025-01-11 21:38:00+00:00): FYI, restoring this to Fernhill Loop. The Lane County roads GIS has this as Fernhill Loop and a survey confirms. Not sure why you thought it was Forest Ridge.
Xanadu_Contractor (2025-01-16 17:15:55+00:00): Thanks, I must have joined the road improperly with the adjoining one.
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-18 17:07:08+00:00): Hi Nodobras, welcome to OSM and thanks for your contributions!

I noticed something interesting in your recent edits, specifically with the names at this location: 
https://osm.org/node/11990458969

Some of the names appear a bit unusual. Could you share a bit about your sources for these names?
Nzau (2024-07-17 17:55:59+00:00): Salut HaPe-CZ,

Certain de vos ajouts semblent erronée comme  highway=cycleway + bicycle=designated.

Je suis revenu à l'ancienne version.

Bonne journée,
Nzau

Hi HaPe-CZ,

Some of your additions seem to be wrong, like highway=cycleway + bicycle=designated.

I've gone back to the old version.

Have a nice day,
Nzau
HaPe-CZ (2024-07-19 06:46:26+00:00): It's possible, a mistake was made. But the old version may not correspond to the position of the line, etc.
Lezurex (2024-06-18 17:27:11+00:00): Hi perenniallylate,

Do you know if construction is finished already? If yes, I'll remove the construction area.
perenniallylate (2024-06-18 18:26:26+00:00): The construction isnt completely finished, I believe interior works and landscaping are still ongoing. I assume the construction will be finished sometime in Summer
Lezurex (2024-06-18 21:34:12+00:00): Alright, thanks.
Marek-M (2024-06-18 19:14:06+00:00): Miejscowość nie posiada ulic. W takiej sytuacji klucz `addr:street` oraz `addr:city` nie powinny być używane. Adresy w takich miejscowościach określane są za pomocą kluczy `addr:place`+`addr:housenumber`.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*#Adres_w_miejscowości_bez_nazw_ulic
Marek-M (2024-06-18 19:17:47+00:00): Poprawiłem Twoją edycję. Czy na pewno ten edytowany budynek ma numer 34? Taki sam numer budynku jest nieco na północ od ronda https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358237241 i potwierdza to mapa https://e-mapa.net/polska/przelek-0500458/34
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-18 17:38:04+00:00): Hi Andrzej196670, welcome to OSM and thanks for your contributions!

I noticed something interesting in your recent edits, specifically with the names at this location.

Some of the names appear a bit unusual. Could you share a bit about your sources for these names?

Thanks.
Marek-M (2024-06-18 19:05:30+00:00): Przełęk to miejscowość bez nazw ulic. Nadawanie w takiej sytuacji drogom nazwy takiej samej jak nazwa miejscowości jest błędem.
Marek-M (2024-06-18 19:21:20+00:00): Wycofanie nieprawidłowych nazw ulic w miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152863225
Langlaeufer (2024-06-20 09:19:40+00:00): Wenn da tatsächlich ein Linienbus fährt (bus=yes) dann wäre service schon angemessen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152857983
HBanu (2024-06-20 14:43:06+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152858161
Zando (2024-09-04 13:04:45+00:00): Per come si presenta sul posto sarebbe da disconnettere dal percorso principale e taggare abandoned:highway=unclassified
romanh (2024-06-22 15:42:12+00:00): Danke für das korrigieren der Transport relationen und Haltepunkte in Wangen.
Gruss aus Wangen Roman (romanh)
d_berger (2024-06-24 22:52:25+00:00): Hoi Roman, gern geschehen. Mit der Mapping-Genauigkeit und Strassengeometrien, sind wir im Mittelland recht gut unterwegs, da komme ich auch relativ zügig voran. Aber der ehemalige OAK-Busbetrieb ist schon eine Nummer, alleine bei Linie 51 gibt es 33 Varianten, die ich jetzt auf 14 "relevante" Fahrwege reduziert habe. Uff... Liebe Grüsse, Dani
romanh (2024-06-26 13:32:12+00:00): Hallo Dani,
das ist der Grund, wieso ich es sehr schätze, wenn ich diese Relation nicht berühren muss. ;-)
Liebe Grüsse, Roman
brendan77 (2024-06-30 02:14:54+00:00): Hi HopsAndSpokes,

Thanks for the contribution!

What is your source for the Kelker Substation Expansion? On the CSU website I don't see anything about fiber here
NeisBot (2024-06-18 17:22:52+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-01 15:32:32+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153417738
literan (2024-06-18 17:30:46+00:00): ну какой же это park

в OSM этот тег - для рекреационных учреждений. На обычные благоустроенные территории его не ставят
citrula (2024-06-18 23:46:14+00:00): Are the soccer fields and parking lots part of the park as well? There's already an area for the park which includes the school, which is probably wrong.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152859070