piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
daniel_k (2023-01-25 19:07:33+00:00): Könntest Du bitte Deine Änderungen im Gewann "Ebene" berichtigen? Das Gebiet nördlich und westlich des Bolzplatzes soll mit Wohnhäusern bebaut werden. Ein entsprechender Bebauungsplan ist bereits seit Jahren aufgestellt.
ticki_52 (2023-01-25 21:17:53+00:00): Hallo Daniel,

da ist doch außer Absichtsbekundungen noch nichts passiert. Bevor der neu zu erstellende Baubauungsplan nicht genehmigt ist, würde ich da nichts kartieren, es sei denn, Du willst die Naturschützer überregional aufwecken. 

Grüße ticki_52
bradrh (2023-01-29 19:47:50+00:00): Nice work.   However,  I think the ref should include TR.
valhikes (2023-01-29 21:43:29+00:00): I have never seen TR as part of a ref in an official way and it doesn't add any information. These types of prefixes are used to distinguish roads from different agencies. There's nothing to distinguish here and "TR" wouldn't do it anyway.
bradrh (2023-01-29 21:47:06+00:00): I don't care very much, but TR is common on trail signs, and we use FR on the forest roads.
bradrh (2023-02-03 19:38:04+00:00): I'm going to quit putting TR on the trail refs.  You're right, not any value added.
JanzoJanzo (2023-01-22 22:02:37+00:00): Sovrapposizione con "Sarpi" 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404140246 
-Forse andrebbero suddivisi Chinatown e Bullona
marc__marc (2023-05-25 20:29:04+00:00): bonjour,
il y a maintenant un panneau 30km/h à la place du panneau F12a https://images.trafficsupply.nl/imgsrc/900/900/i-124437-c2b/panneau-g2000-f12a-debut-dune-zone-residentielle-ou-dune-zone-de-rencontre.png ?
cimm (2023-05-28 07:33:08+00:00): Bonjour,
Il y a bien un panneau de zone 30km/h. Je ne sais pas s'il y avait un panneau F12a à cet endroit. Pourquoi cette question ?
cimm (2023-05-28 07:35:01+00:00): Ah, vous parlez du nœud 564392129, je suppose. Je vais devoir vérifier cela.
marc__marc (2023-05-28 10:35:14+00:00): je pose cette question pour https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/564392129 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/564392133
soit il y a un panneau living_street et c'est 20km/h
soit il y a un panneau zone 30km/h et ce n'est plus un living_street
Cordiialement,
Marrc
cimm (2023-05-29 19:41:24+00:00): Compris. Je suis allé vérifier et il n'y a pas de panneaux F12a. J'ai corrigé la rue.
dshowland (2023-01-26 20:23:31+00:00): The service road pathway is still under construction and is expected to be an active work site for several years. Is it appropriate to have it marked as a cycleway on OSM when it is not accessible yet?
Pikachu25 (2023-01-26 21:35:36+00:00): I have it marked under dirt, and plan to change it to asphalt when construction is complete. I do understand your point, but I included it because it is still walkable, despite the active work site status. Would you like me to make a note regarding it as an active work site?
dshowland (2023-01-27 14:31:00+00:00): That makes sense -  I think the right tag would be highway=construction? Unless the progress has changed dramatically in the last few days the trees hadn't even been cleared on much of the route the last time I drove through.
bxl-forever (2023-01-22 22:01:26+00:00): Hello,

What is the added value of adding extra name:* tags that are exact duplicates of the main name?

Adding translations is only useful when they are different from the name tag.
user_16642036 (2023-01-22 22:12:05+00:00): Some users have a multilingual language list in there browser/system. This can cause the name tag to differ from the specific language.

For example if your device specific language list is 1. Dutch (nl) 2. Russian (ru), it would show the Russian name first, because the name:nl tag is missing, despite being Dutch your primary language. To ensure the Dutch name is shown as primary, the name:nl tag is needed.
bxl-forever (2023-01-22 22:47:48+00:00): This is caring for very non-standard behaviour, because a missing name tag should always default to the main name.  Do you know an example of software that has this issue, so that we could report it upstream?
user_16642036 (2023-01-22 23:31:43+00:00): The best example is openstreetmap.org. Change the language list of your OSM account to "nl ru" [1. Dutch 2. Russian] (Link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/preferences) and then you see the name of this municipality in the header in Russian instead of Dutch, because there is no name:nl tag: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/308897364
gebux (2023-01-24 14:14:52+00:00): Hör bitte auf so viele unnötige Multipolygone zu erzeugen.
MPs sind ein Werkzeug das nur angewendet werden sollte, wenn es tatsächlich notwendig ist, nicht als allgemeines Tool um Landuses zu erfassen.
Mit deinen Edits verwandelst du auch schon vorhandene, und wie in OSM üblich, als Polygonring erfasste Landuses in Multipolygone.
Beispiel https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9731178
Vorher ein Multipolygon mit einem Outer und 9 inners, seit deinen Änderungen ein MP mit 41 zusätzlichen Outers und umgeben von weiteren MPs

Eine schnelle und nicht vollständige Overpassabfrage über MPs ohne inners
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1qwS

Diskussionen im Forum: 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=16911
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=73341
Austrianton (2023-01-24 15:32:31+00:00): Wird gemacht. Ich glaub ich bin da sowohl dem englischen Wiki als auch dem ID editor aufgesessen. Dort wird nämlich nicht darauf hingewiesen, dass Multipoligone ein Problem darstellen und im Fall des ID Editors einem sogar quasi die Nutzung aufgedrängt.

Und jetzt als Frage, damit ich das in Zukunft wirklich richtig machen kann:
Wie geht es denn genau richtig?
gebux (2023-01-24 16:46:39+00:00): Klick auf einen Punkt im Umriss von einem vorhandenen Landuse und ziehe eine Linie zu einen benachbarten Punkt. Nachdem du jetzt eine Richtung vorgegeben hast, 
kannst du mit 'F' dem vorhandenen Landuse folgen. Bei einer Kreuzung mit einem anderen Landuse musst du einmal mit einem Klick entscheiden in welche Richtung es weitergehen soll 
bevor du wieder 'F' verwenden kannst. 
Das machst du bis du wieder am ersten Punkt angelangt bist. 
Dem geschlossenen Polygonring kannst du dann die Landuse Merkmale zuweisen. 
Ein Multipolygon ist nur notwendig wenn dein neues Landuse andere Landuses komplett umschließt.  
Wie du genau deine Trennungen machst, ob du Straßen ausnimmst oder einschließt ist dir überlassen. Man muss halt einen Mittelweg zwischen Wartbarkeit und Genauigkeit finden was nicht gerade einfach ist. 
Landuses sollten aber nur an andere Landuses grenzen und keinesfalls mit Straßen verklebt werden. 
Auch Gebäude sollten eher nicht an Landuses kleben.
Austrianton (2023-01-24 17:22:49+00:00): Danke sehr für die Erklärung (besonders bezüglich dem Hotkey). Ich werde mich in Zukunft daran halten.
mueschel (2023-01-23 10:57:07+00:00): Hi,
it seems something went wrong here - many of the ways got several foreign tags that don't look like they should be in OSM, e.g.

AreaCode = Lake Wenatchee
CommonName = 7C
DistMile = 2.8687810636117415
GlobalID = {8665C6B2-0981-47A8-BB6E-02CE49DE38CB}
Length = 0.0
Name = 7CC
OBJECTID = 408
ProperName = 6105
SHAPE_Length = 0.049771100475585736
Type_of_Tr = Motorized-Groomed
gscholz (2023-01-25 06:32:24+00:00): Hi 58zarali,
this changeset has created a big amount of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines and duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=41.52830&lat=40.81315&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131584614

Can you please fix this?

Please also have a look at the warnings listed above, please do not ignore those.
Kind regards
Guido
58zarali (2023-01-25 11:19:51+00:00): Hi gscholz,

All error fixed.
Tom Delmas (2023-01-26 12:55:23+00:00): Pourquoi avoir remplacé des "traffic_calming" par des "footway=sidewalk" ? Les piétons ne sont pas supposés marcher sur ces ilots, qui sont là pour calmer la circulation. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131584622
Britzz (2023-01-26 17:13:03+00:00): Comme le passage piéton passe entre deux j'ai pensé à sidewalk mais traffic_calming est plus précis, en effet. J'ai changé les deux zones concernées.
Tom Delmas (2023-01-26 19:50:52+00:00): Parfait. J'ai aussi corrigé le sens unique qui avait été laissé par erreur sur 5 mètres suite à la "simplification" du carrefour. Les calculateurs d'itinéraires n'auraient plus fonctionnés.
Britzz (2023-01-27 13:49:52+00:00): Bien vu, merci ; rien de tel que l'édition collective pour arriver à une "bonne" modélisation
Tom Delmas (2023-01-31 08:43:48+00:00): Entièrement d'accord !
mbeyerle (2023-01-31 19:37:04+00:00): thanks!
ticki_52 (2026-07-22 11:48:04+00:00): 1. Das Tag natural=tree_row ist für andere Fälle vorgesehen.
2. Mit diesem tag sind die Bäume doppelt getaggt. 
Bitte entferne  natural=tree_row.
Joseph R P (2023-01-30 00:15:04+00:00): Hello, this section of road should not be a motorway as there is an at-grade crossing between the grade separations. I've reverted this bypass back to trunk.
gscholz (2023-01-25 16:02:09+00:00): Hi bbtns1,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=28.06627&lat=40.45712&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131585338

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-01-27 07:20:02+00:00): Hi bbtns1, 
due to your missing response I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
MxxCon (2023-01-24 04:40:30+00:00): Hello.
Is this the correct location of that bus stop? Satellite imagery shows rows of parked cars with no space for a bus stop.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131585679
rltvtmln (2023-02-01 03:56:43+00:00): Yes, that is the new location according to a survey.
jeslop (2023-01-24 16:53:12+00:00): Frontesp, se te advirtió en otro conjunto de cambios (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125602761) que no cambies los nombres de los centros educativos.

Tienes por costumbre no responder a los otros usuarios, lo cuál no está de acuerdo con el espíritu colaborativo de OSM:
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=13616938

Revierto este cambio de nombre.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
user_18250760 (2023-01-23 00:05:14+00:00): Biondo, Manila Intramous, Manila Fix highway unclassified
Jerry Jorts (2023-01-23 11:31:04+00:00): Hi Jonaianimail.
I have reverted your last changeset due to many errors that seem to have been done by mistake. We've all done mistakes in the beginning so dont be discouraged from mapping again. :) Please use already mapped features as a guide and example to how mapping should be. You can also learn more about mapping on the OpenStreetMap Wiki.
Have a great day!
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-30 19:18:09+00:00): Hi, 
Why did you chance the construction zone? They are demolishing the whole building
RaphaelPasloin (2023-01-31 00:16:42+00:00): Hello, it's based on a ground survey and it's indicated here : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3521390#map=18/50.86154/4.34941 and on my changeset desciption (link to the permit). That was notified to you on this changeset comment also : 131341836. 
If they demolished this part will be a legality problem and also a practical problem : the general direction of "enseignement" use the 16 (and a lot of vzw) and have a long term contrat  of leasing until 2036). 

On what source you affirm this building will be demolished ?
RaphaelPasloin (2023-01-31 00:22:48+00:00): FYI : 
https://www.arau.org/content/uploads/2019/02/Analyse-KBC-av.-du-Port-12-14.pdf

https://molenbeekadm.irisnet.be/fr/fichiers/urbanisme/avis-commission-de-concertation/07-07.2020/24-pu-37-338-av-du-port-12-14.pdf
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-31 07:48:02+00:00): alright we will weave it like this and we will see when it's demolished
RaphaelPasloin (2023-01-31 09:24:05+00:00): On what source you affirm this building will be demolished ?
Udarian (2023-01-23 00:22:00+00:00): forgot to put in the main message but this closes Note 3526024
MxxCon (2023-01-24 04:42:47+00:00): Cross-Atlantic bus routes..🤔
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131586366
Warin61 (2023-02-15 03:10:07+00:00): I note that it has been 6 months since the introduction of the 'permission to use' this data on the Australian Data Catalog. Yet the 'permission' document remains missing. Suggest you spend time getting that done....
jMapsAu (2023-02-15 14:35:02+00:00): Suggestion noted
Wiki account is still not elevated, so WIP but no ETA
ZLima12 (2023-02-04 00:42:31+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM! Thanks for contributing.

Unfortunately, I had to revert the part of this changeset that worked on the intersection. Unless the roads can't be driven on, you should never leave them fragmented and disconnected like this. Even a rough guess is better than not mapping it at all.

If you're not sure how to map something, the wiki is a great place to look. You can also send me a message anytime if you're lost on something.

Thanks again for contributing!
-John
FxsX24 (2023-03-20 20:17:24+00:00): just made the proper edits to this,. The roads were closed and a new traffic pattern was created
CurlingMan13 (2023-01-23 05:18:56+00:00): It should probably be access=private, not access=no.
Udarian (2023-01-23 01:48:08+00:00): I did ask for sources in 130994699 and have since not received any response on the matter from the author of those commits (the Beatles in 3D)
Leo1590 (2023-01-23 13:52:02+00:00): Hola! Gracias por agregar datos al mapa. Decidimos poner el nombre de la calle sin los puntos cardinales, estos directamente los colocamos en las numeraciones de cada parcela.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131587237
mrpulley (2024-06-14 10:55:27+00:00): Confirming that maxspeed is correct here (checked on survey)
mrpulley (2025-12-13 08:39:15+00:00): 218878163 - maxspeed 50 (not 100)
199438200 - maxspeed is correct, but road is not oneway
218878580 - maxspeed correct, apart from eastern end (still maxspeed 50)
corrected at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169397180
173004978, 578940745, 218878162 - maxspeed correct
199316612, 218875379, 454463009, 1134405100 not checked
mrpulley (2025-12-13 11:48:09+00:00): 219398811, 1134406022, 1111906864 - maxspeed correct
52674251, 1134406023 maxspeed correct (speed zone change between these is a little further south - corrected at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170905509)
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-02-06 12:30:23+00:00): Please don't add fake features like non-existent paths along roads.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 13:52:52+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131588648
user_5359 (2023-03-25 09:47:33+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/1370612107/history. What ist the to add highway=residential and different name to this crossing?
aaei924 (2023-03-25 11:16:55+00:00): Oh... It maybe my mistake. Thanks for letting me know!
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-31 03:12:36+00:00): All Changesets reverted by DWG as vandalism: changeset/131903043
mrpulley (2026-02-28 06:11:19+00:00): Confirming that maxspeed is correct here (checked at survey)
AndreasTUHU (2023-02-20 07:57:14+00:00): Szia!
Az Iszkor étterem duplázva lett, valószínűleg ugyanazt a cikket olvastátok :)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1134263411#map=19/48.15630/20.49459
Üdv,
András
GBAB (2023-02-20 08:12:32+00:00): Hja, ráadásul én voltam a későbbi: fogalmam sincs, mint néztem el. Talán az történt, hogy amikor megszerkesztettem, még nem volt ott a másik, aztán csak egy-két nappal később jutott eszembe feltölteni, s akkor már ott volt mellette a következő is…
Sree1922 (2023-01-23 05:33:04+00:00): Added role to relation member
literan (2024-10-14 17:14:32+00:00): Вносить данные из Яндекса либо из иных коммерческих карт и иных источников, не давших прямого разрешения на внесение данных в OSM, категорически запрещено (вы ознакомлены с лицензией в ходе регистрации в проекте). Правку придется откатить.
literan (2024-10-14 17:16:30+00:00): Также, прошу вас не вносить в поле name описания. Оно только для имен собственных. Например name=Ресторан неправильно. name=Пегас (для ресторана "Пегас") - правильно.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#%D0%98%D0%BC%D1%8F_%E2%80%93_%D1%8D%D1%82%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B8_%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE
mrpulley (2026-02-28 10:37:41+00:00): 1134422226, 803274794, 187919554, 1101389172 maxspeed correct
132605108 maxspeed correct (didn't check 132605107).
498183594 previously surveyed maxspeed 60, you changed to 100, survey Nov 2025 confirmed maxspeed 60
476432064 maxspeed 50 (not 40 apart from school hours)
Others not checked
futongrab (2023-02-08 03:29:46+00:00): Any reasons why you've deleted the cycleway along Fraser Hwy between 140 St and 148 St, and added as cycleway:lane?
Protected bike lanes were constructed in 2022, so satellite images are outdated.
ngry_pazuzu (2023-02-08 04:56:06+00:00): I am aware of the newly constructed infrastructure, as I rode eastbound along the Fraser Highway myself just over a week ago.

West of the junction with the Green Timbers Greenway, there is a ditch separating the cycleway from the road, and so a separately mapped cycleway made sense there. But I was hunting for the same kind of path after the junction, and got really confused when I couldn't find it.  I then realized that there was no path with a ditch between it and the road like there was up to that point.

I saw that this new cycleway was constructed by putting curbs on the asphalt that formed the new road surface to separate car traffic from bike traffic. So I deleted the path and added it as a "cycleway:track", not a "cycleway:lane". According to the documentation at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway, it says that a "A cycle track (mapped with a separate way) is separated from the road by curbs, parking lots, grass verges, trees, non-flexible bollards or another physical barrier, but is running parallel and next to the road."  Using a cycle track appears to be a more appropriate representation of what is actually there, and would certainly be less confusing for a cyclist riding through.
Diacritic (2023-01-23 11:16:38+00:00): Hi Ka-ma-al.

Thanks for your contribution to the St Albans area.

I can see you've tried to add houses to the area, but it appears you've used the incorrect tag.

The best way to tag houses is to use the tag building=house, or just use the "House" preset in the editor. 

Happy Mapping!
cs09736 (2023-05-05 07:36:59+00:00): I passed through this road today and couldn't see any indication that bikes could ride down the other side of it. The opposite side of Dandenong Road definitely has an opposing bike lane but there wasn't one on this side. I might have missed a sign but was there any physical indicator when you mapped this?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:08:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:13:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:10:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:13:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:16:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
dadavid (2023-03-30 12:01:24+00:00): Hi, 
die von dir geändert destination:ref=* ist leider nicht korrekt. In diesem Tag wird eingetragen, auf welche Straße diese Abfahrt führt, die alte destination:ref=B 14 war also nicht ganz falsch, besser wäre natürlich destination:ref=St 1066 gewesen. 
Das wurde mitlerweile von einem anderen user hier korrigiert, deswegen ist es kein Problem mehr, aber schaue dir dazu im Zweifelsfall auch gerne einfach immer den entsprechenden OSM-Wiki Eintrag an, indem du im Editor auf das kleine (i) drückst oder einfach im wiki direkt suchst. 
wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:destination:ref?uselang=de
Grüße
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:10:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Warin61 (2026-04-08 05:54:14+00:00): Manchester Square includes the surrounding buildings .. they carry that as part of their address. Same in England.
NorthCrab (2023-01-23 10:24:14+00:00): Dodałem kategorię tego POI jako car_repair. Usunąłem także stare oznaczenie autosfery ponieważ wygląda na to że nastąpiła zmiana właściciela. Nie jestem pewien jednak podanego przez ciebie numeru telefonu bo na stronie widnieje inny: +48 691 102 200