piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eerib (2026-01-29 21:22:09+00:00): Revert CS177863952, 177863808, 177863316 - Vandalism & Deceit (AI edited photo)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177866248
eggie (2026-01-29 20:29:09+00:00): Hoi,

De Oostermaten liep gedeeltelijk verder over de Nijverheidsweg. We noemen dat duplicated ways.
Een weg op een weg getekend.
Ik heb het hersteld.
Hier kun je zien hoe je hebt ingetekend.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=177864248

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-29 20:32:26+00:00): Waar de werg door het water loopt heb ik een dam gemaakt en het water gesplitst.
eggie (2026-01-29 20:34:56+00:00): lanes=0 heb ik verwijderd. Dat kan fysiek niet.
lanes in zo'n wijkje (binnenstraten) gewoon niet gebruiken. 
access=unknown kun je beter verwijderen. Dat voegt niets toe. 

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2026-01-29 20:38:37+00:00): parking =yes verwijderd. Dat is niet een valide tag.
Je zou bv parking=surface kunnen gebruiken. yes zegt helemaal niets.
Paul10k (2026-01-30 09:38:05+00:00): Ja, dat parking=yes slaat nergens op. Geen idee waarom ik dat heb verzonnen.
Paul10k (2026-01-30 09:40:33+00:00): Een weg op een weg is verwarrend, begrijp ik.
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:05:02+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13471926595 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Wealth Management Office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-08 09:27:54+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178257622
(No visible changes after review)
MassCartog (2026-01-29 21:09:55+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM, careful not to drag other nodes while adding features to the map! I fixed this for you.
arjunaraoc (2026-02-22 00:16:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177864835
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:05:03+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13507008120 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Wedding venue"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-08 09:27:54+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178257625
(No visible changes after review)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-21 04:47:10+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Cleaned up SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186095339
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-02 08:40:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 177995999, 177995996 where the changeset comment is: revert unilateral and undiscussed name changes, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19737
ika-chan! (2026-01-29 21:43:51+00:00): The roads you deleted do exist according to Esri: some are just behind a locked gate.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177866948
Frans S (2026-01-30 12:19:04+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not connect nodes of (service) roads to a building or other features except roads. These are errors that have to be adjusted.
Best regards
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-02 08:40:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 177995999, 177995996 where the changeset comment is: revert unilateral and undiscussed name changes, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19737
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-02 08:40:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 177995999, 177995996 where the changeset comment is: revert unilateral and undiscussed name changes, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19737
skquinn (2026-01-29 23:34:27+00:00): Hi,

Most of your first edits on OpenStreetMap look great. However for future reference please note that road names should not be abbreviated: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations
demon_box (2026-01-30 07:25:08+00:00): Ciao sercos, ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti un edificio può avere più entrate e di conseguenza più numeri civici. 
Quindi hai 2 opzioni: 
1. Se conosci esattamente la posizione (entrata) del civico che stai mappando metti tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su un nodo del perimetro dell'edificio (aggiungendo anche il tag entrance sullo stesso nodo);
2. Se invece non hai questa informazione così precisa devi mettere tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su nodo adiacente ma STACCATO dal poligono dell'edificio.
Ho già proceduto con le correzioni del caso. 
Grazie e BuonMapping!
Luzandro (2026-01-30 08:13:00+00:00): Hallo,

bitte lösche keine crossing=* Einträge, wenn du crossing:marking=* setzt. Mit letzterem kannst du die Art der Markierung genauer spezifizieren, aber crossing=marked/uncontrolled ist immer noch zutreffend.

Auch wenn es für den node keinen Unterschied macht, nachdem sich hier sowieso nichts überlagert, aber das layer=-1 für die Einfahrt zur Tiefgarage ist nicht nur unnötig, sondern eigentlich falsch https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4603998656

Und wenn möglich, verwende bitte separate Changesets für unterschiedliche Gegenden, sodass das Changeset nicht halb Österreich abdeckt
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177866359
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:03:22+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/323350426 v1 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/868486700 v1 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/868486699 v1 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/3301492275 v2
https://osm.org/node/8095298777 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177866418
AndyB_66 (2026-03-18 21:35:52+00:00): "opole" to nie jest dobry opis zestawu zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-27 12:09:36+00:00): Cleaned up mistagging for Lucid Private Offices POI in changeset 184691643

https://osm.org/changeset/184691643
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:05:05+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13480415656 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Meat products store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-08 09:27:55+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178257627
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:05:06+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/10874897272 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Outdoor furniture store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-08 09:27:55+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178257628
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:05:07+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13477181594 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dress store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-08 09:27:58+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178257629
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
JAXON1 (2026-01-29 21:52:17+00:00): Is 1 Change.
cartografy (2026-01-30 17:04:54+00:00): Correction: Source used was Vantor Satellite Imagery via Vantor Hub 2026-01-08
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:05:08+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13500695446 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Brick pavers company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-08 09:28:00+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178257630
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:03:26+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 20 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1458342059 v2 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1349167433 v3 | 7 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177867983
NeisReview (2026-02-07 07:49:03+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177992330
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:05:10+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13304956381 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Assisted living facility"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-08 09:28:00+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178257631
(No visible changes after review)
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-10 13:48:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 178361052 where the changeset comment is: revert unexplained 'f4map' modifications, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178130466
Udarian (2026-01-29 23:45:13+00:00): I don't know how accurate the light poles around the Golden Glades Interchange are due to the fact that there is allot of construction in the area (it is not on bing aerial or esri), for more info see https://go-ggi.com/
as a note for you going forward there is also allot of construction around the intersection of Dolphine expressway, I 95 and and I 395, for more info on that see https://i395-miami.com/
If you have any further questions feel free to respond here or send me a private message through OSM, I am also on the OSMUS slack. you also don't have to delete everything as there is newer imagery from the county that shows some of the progress (its from early January of 2025 and there has been quite some progress on the construction since, with some recent changes from the Lyft team using their newer imagery). I can tell what that imagery is if you want (you can use it as a custom imagery layer in iD).

Happy mapping,
Udar.
Gamer2000 (2026-01-30 04:00:02+00:00): Hey thanks for the note, I'm absolutely aware of the construction that is happening, a lot of times I use google street view in order to see if anything changes overtime. But yeah ty for the links that way I get more info.

-Gamer2000
bxl-forever (2026-01-30 20:13:34+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thanks for updating the map.

Could you please write more useful changeset titles when you upload something to the database.  There is no use stating "Added/fixed near <name of the city>" for every changeset.  OSM is a geographical database, it is immediately visible that a changeset is here in Edmonton, or that a changeset is in Canmore or wherever.  Such a title adds very little useful information.

Instead, people might wonder why a lone mapper obtains all this knowledge about the names of fairly remote places, or the internal ref codes of bus stops.  Documenting changes, so that we know whether it comes from your own surveys/explorations, whether you are just clicking on automatic fixes from the iD editor, or whether you are importing government data, for instance.

One more suggestion.  Please try to make smaller changes, with one upload for one specific theme/area instead of gerenic stuff all around Edmonton all in the same changeset.  This would also make it easier for other mappers, to repair mistakes.

Thanks in advance, and happy mapping.
JuanElDemografo (2026-01-30 05:16:16+00:00): Hi Tony there were a few issues with this changeset. First is that you included two sets of edits from an airfield in Texas and a neighborhood in Florida. Please try to keep changesets as geographically compact as possible.

Next, the taxiway you added to the airport in Texas doesn't seem to match the imagery available. You used bing aerial in the the osm.org editor right?

Lastly, you added a couple crossings in Florida with crossing:markings=yes, but I can't see any sign of markings in the imagery.

I hope this helps!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177869868
Tony6154 (2026-01-31 12:48:47+00:00): I mostly update using local knowledge instead of imagery. This is prevalent in for the airfield in Texas. The hiking and creek have been added just from my knowledge of the area.

 The taxiway does exist. It gets used when we're in south flow operations. There is quite a bit of areas
JuanElDemografo (2026-02-03 15:43:09+00:00): I'm sorry, but your reply doesn't make sense. What do you mean "This is prevalent for the airfield in Texas"? What do you mean "There is quite a bit of areas"?

To clarify, my issue is that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1472523569 doesn't line up with the most recent ESRI imagery from January 2025. It should connect at a right angle with the runway, unless the airfield has been resurfaced since then.
Tony6154 (2026-02-04 00:06:13+00:00): Prevalent means "widespread in a particular area or at a particular time." I'm updating the maps based on my knowledge of the area, my knowledge is prevalent because I know the area and used the taxiway over the past weekend. The taxiway has been there for sometime, I don't know why it not on the ESRI.
JuanElDemografo (2026-02-04 01:01:36+00:00): I'll trust your local knowledge if you say so.

You should look up examples on how prevalent is used since you definitely misunderstood the dictionary definition you gave. One wouldn't describe the breadth of one's knowledge as prevalent; instead you'd use it to describe how common things or practices are, eg "Dr. Pepper is a prevalent drink in Texas."

Happy mapping! :)
Tjc_deflock (2026-01-30 06:05:51+00:00): Not 100% sure if LPR is Leonardo but it’s the closest model that resembles it Mounted on the back of street light pole 3 cameras for each lane
Tjc_deflock (2026-01-30 06:04:38+00:00): Not 100% sure if LPR is Leonardo but it’s the closest model that resembles it Mounted on the back of street light pole
felipeeugenio (2026-01-30 11:54:51+00:00): Hola. La casa que modificaste, al igual que todas las casas del condominio, tienen la misma dirección; Avenida Las Perdices 4160, lo único que las distingue es el número de casa.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177870058
Stalker61 (2026-04-02 03:25:30+00:00): Здравствуйте. Какого ... менять статус участка транзитной автодороги, проходящей через НП, с tertiary до residential. Задолбали вы любители истории. Разломали весь дорожный граф и маршрутизацию. Про изоляты видимо отродясь не слышали?
Дымков Артём Денисович (2026-04-02 07:43:54+00:00): Какой участок имеется в в виду?
Glassman (2026-01-30 22:30:18+00:00): #TIP: Also remove the old business tags, like the ones for Taco Time. I went ahead and removed them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177870331
Tjc_deflock (2026-01-30 06:03:59+00:00): Not 100% sure if LPR is Leonardo but it’s the closest model that resembles it Mounted on the back of street light pole
Leo Slager (2026-01-30 23:28:44+00:00): Op de Krommedijk staat nu 2x lanes=2. Dus dat zijn 4 rijstroken.
Na het splitsen van de weg in 2 x éénrichtingsweg is dat niet meer juist.
Met de pdok luchtfoto als achtergrond heb ik dat even aangepast.
Prima dat je met JOSM verder gaat.
In het begin is het even wennen, maar daarna ben ik nooit meer terug gegaan naar iD.
Veel succes met verder mappen.
alester (2026-07-14 03:47:03+00:00): I just noticed that a "YH" prefix has been added to BC Highways 5 and 16, and "CN" to Highway 3. I've never seen these prefixes used by anyone in BC, either in official or common use.

Was there a discussion that decided to add these? If so, I'd be interested in reading the justification. If not, I'd also like to know the justification for creating artificial prefixes rather than the "BC" prefix that would normally be used.
gjantz (2026-07-12 22:21:33+00:00): Did I Do something wrong here or why is this not an own node? You should be able to search for it in the search Bar by typing "PIN AG - Depot Spandau" just like its possible for the "PIN AG - Depot Wilmersdorf".
The Spandau one is not an own node, its just showing an Image in the background, but its Not actually a POI with its own node.
Tjc_deflock (2026-01-30 08:24:09+00:00): Flock PTZ camera, personally saw these being installed by a bucket truck with flock branding
Tjc_deflock (2026-01-30 08:23:16+00:00): Flock PTZ camera, personally saw these being installed by a bucket truck with flock branding
Himké (2026-01-30 02:36:47+00:00): BC 3B;BC 22
Tjc_deflock (2026-01-30 06:08:24+00:00): Flock PTZ camera, personally saw these being installed by a bucket truck with flock branding
Tjc_deflock (2026-01-30 08:22:40+00:00): Flock PTZ camera, personally saw these being installed by a bucket truck with flock branding
Supaplex (2026-01-30 02:39:07+00:00): Can you split your changeset to at least 2?
It make review much easier
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177871080
cnvery (2026-07-07 14:02:54+00:00): Hi @Supaplex, thanks for friendly reminder and comments. Will split into smaller changesets in the future.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-30 01:51:09+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13511038259

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Tjc_deflock (2026-01-30 06:08:07+00:00): Flock PTZ camera, personally saw these being installed by a bucket truck with flock branding
Frank Peng (2026-01-31 01:13:14+00:00): I see that you deleted a turn restriction relation and recreated the turn restriction in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15775123/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20151461. As mentioned to you numerous times in a number of your changesets, please don't delete existing map elements (nodes, ways, relations) and redraw them from scratch. Doing such things is against good practice on OSM. Instead, please just modify the existing map elements as it helps preserve the element history on OSM. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177871913
Frank Peng (2026-01-31 01:13:27+00:00): For the no-u-turn restriction relation you deleted in this changeset, I don't think there was a need to delete the no-u-turn restriction relation at the Park Road side of the roundabout and recreate it. You could have held down the "Shift" key on your keyboard and selected the park area and the node connecting the bi-directional and one-way sections of Park Road at the roundabout (the node at where Park Road divides entering the roundabout), right-clicked on the node, and selected the "Disconnect" option or pressed "D" on your keyboard to disconnect the park area from the roads. So there was no need to remove the node from the no-u-turn restriction relation or even delete the relation.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177871913
Frank Peng (2026-01-31 01:26:13+00:00): Just to clarify, you could have disconnected the park area from the Park Road ways by holding down the "Shift" key on your keyboard and selecting the park area and the node connecting the bi-directional and one-way sections of Park Road next to the roundabout (the node at where Park Road divides entering the roundabout), and either right-clicked on the node and selected the "Disconnect" option to disconnect the park area from the roads, or pressed "D" on your keyboard to disconnect the park area from the roads. So there was no need to remove the node from the no-u-turn restriction relation or even delete the relation.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177871913