piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
wolfgang8 (2025-12-22 13:42:23+00:00): Hallo,
Basemap.at dürfte hier nicht ganz die Realität abbilden. Soweit mir bekannt, gibt es bei der B3 keine entsprechende Beschilderung mit "Sepp-Puchinger-Promenade" oder "Steiner Donaulände".
DerKaiserschmarren (2025-12-22 22:02:16+00:00): Da die Vorherige Beschilderung "Donau Bundesstraße" ebenfalls nun nicht verifizierbar ist (abseits der Road-Route)
werde ich den Namen überall komplett entfernen.
DerKaiserschmarren (2025-12-22 22:09:26+00:00): Nun hat keiner der Straßen einen Namen mehr, weil dies ja auch nicht so ausgeschildert ist. Basemap nimmt hier ziemlich offensichtlich den Namen vom Treppelweg, der vermutlich falsch ist.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176284236
wolfgang8 (2025-12-23 06:43:09+00:00): "Sepp-Puchinger-Promenade" beim Treppelweg dürfte passen:

https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Sepp-Puchinger-Promenade%22+krems

Weiter östlich entlang der Donau gibt noch weitere Promenadewege wie z.B. die "Gregor-Hradetzky-Promenade", "Fritz-Landertinger-Promenade" und die "Dr.-Franz-Riel-Promenade".
DerKaiserschmarren (2025-12-23 11:51:26+00:00): Ich vermute aber der Dr. google hat das auch aus Basemap und nicht vor Ort geprüft
𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ (2025-12-25 12:15:50+00:00): Probably something I've messed up. Thanks for the fix!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176253399
joy3221 (2025-12-23 01:59:00+00:00): How to revert change??
nevw (2025-12-23 20:16:03+00:00): I reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176324819 using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osm-revert
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:51:54+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11562098771 v4

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Safe deposit box rental service"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 17:51:49+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176490236
Thanks @uncomplice
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:51:57+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13394761265 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Agence de branding et design à Nabeul"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ta description pourrait être : « Agence de branding et design à Nabeul »
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 17:51:49+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176713209
ManuelB701 (2025-12-23 11:36:18+00:00): Okay but you didn't have to delete existing data and re-add a new element with the same geometry, you can simply retag them instead (talking about the grass patches).
Kaissner (2026-02-09 08:47:39+00:00): hello! I just saw it right now, I tried to retag them but I didnt know how to convert line to area, I tried looking around but couldnt find a way to do so
ManuelB701 (2026-02-09 17:48:07+00:00): Basically, closed lines and areas are nearly the same thin on OSM and the only difference between them is whether the primary tag (e.g. landuse=*) is classified for areas or not (e.g. a closed building=* way is always an area but a closed barrier=fence is always a line) or if the line has an area=yes added to it (which matters on a few elements like highway=pedestrian).

By replacing the lines with "areas", you really ended up replacing lines with another set of lines.

Mind you, iD does make the conversion little bit difficult where you can't simply pick an area template on a bare closed line and you instead need to manually edit the tag list below.
rarad74 (2025-12-22 10:56:58+00:00): Ai facut harta asta swaiter. Lasi toate strazile neconectate. Daca nu te opresti sau schimbi editorul , te vor opri cei de la Data Working Group. Ignori in continuare s apui comentarii. Ignori sfaturile pe care ti l-em dat. Aici nu esti la tine acasa. Esti intr-o comunitate in care altii fac treaba corecta si nu le convine ca tu sa le-o strici.
surveyor54 (2025-12-22 10:05:21+00:00): Änderungssatz Kommentar Korrektur:
Naturschutzgebiet " Piepenbruchsiepen" eingepflegt
SekeRob (2026-05-20 07:20:36+00:00): Hi,

The addresses you put in with Contrada San Silvestro, an 'o' at the end are problematic for 2 reasons. For 1 change set you refer to ANNCSU which has on the address search page https://www.anncsu.gov.it/it/consultazione-dellarchivio/ricerca-strade-e-numeri-civici/ a license reference of CC-BY 4.0 which is not compatible with OSM i.e. we can not use them.  2). ANNCSU is highly inaccurate and so it was confirmed again. Did a survey from the bottom at Carlo Totaro in Silvi. First city begin sign corner with Borsolino says Santo Stefano and the address tags that I could find said Contrada Santo Stefano,. Then as following the road uphill (done many fast downhills there from Pianacce), there's end/begin signs of Santo Stefano and a little furthers there's city begin/end signs saying 'San Silvestre' with an 'e' at the end. As following the road thru, near a B&B the end/begin sign say San Silvestre with an E. That's pretty darn official to me. Then at the B&B the address shield says, yes, Via San Silvestre 97, not  Contrada San Silvestro. So, think those ANNCSU addresses have to come off tout suite. Many names in ANNCSU do not match what's' on the ground and I sent you several CS comments before about that ANNCSU versus 'on the ground' conflict.  The numbers and placement are UNreliable... they forgot a digit in the coordinates which easily puts address numbers on the wrong side of the road or wrong building and the mssing digit in effect locates every single address inaccurately, Worse a survey in Pescara revealed a whole group of numbers don't exist at all... only the even number. The odd ones are a mirage. Who's inventing them I don't know, I just know that Entrata has often none matching addresses such as my own street where they write to me as Via, but the old and new corner signs say Strada, and that is what we map, OSM rule, I strongly recommend you revisit all of these ANNCSU sourced data and back them out. You were so kind to put tags on some, the database shows
69 source:name=ANNCSU
42 source=ANNCSU
Cant say all are you's but an overpass query show a large number in Abruzzo. Easily retraceable in the OSM Db.
To repeat CC-BY 4.0 is not a compatible license to OSM, ANNCSU is inaccurate, unreliable, unfit for purpose. Can't use.

Happy Mapping
SekeRob
damianeue (2026-07-27 09:33:00+00:00): Hi SekeRob,
regarding Contrada San Silvestre/Contrada San Silvestro: two of my coworkers live on that street and their address is "Contrada San Silvestro", with an O, on their official documents. Do you think it's possible that some numbers are officially listed as "San Silvestre" while others as "San Silvestro"?
I won't create another changeset, I wanted to talk to you about this first.

Lmk
SekeRob (2026-07-27 11:11:46+00:00): Yes, pretty daft. But its what signed and all 4 city limit signs say San Silvestre,. An address I looked at next to the church has a stylized e at the end which could be mistaken for an o if you don't look close. At any rate, you can
put Silvestro under the official_name tag to document it. OSM only cares about on ground verifiable and commonly known, where ANNCSU continues to be off limit CC-BY 4.0 and poor at that. We have no signed waiver granted to OSM to use their poor data with adresses badly positioned, wrong building, wrong side of street and  or not even existing. Houses that were or still have to be build.
SekeRob (2026-07-28 14:27:59+00:00): Another ride uphill, a gentlemen in his mid seventees on church steps tells when asked that there is indeed a section in San Silvestre where the residents have for unknown to him reason San Silvestro in their documents. Reverified 102 while there and prints in big letters  cnr San Silvestre, Cnr seems to stand for Cantonato, corner/intersection (new to me) which by logic would than also apply to 104/106 you mapped with San Silvestro giving that ANNCSU source again. To his knowledge there are no streetsigns by that name, just that everyone knows the main road going all the way to the B&B La Casa dei Nonni ** is Via San Silvestre, also locally known as Contrada San Silvestre. So, your colleagues while having that San Silvestro in their IDs, it's more administrative than anything. One note. Would be interesting to know if the whole village has one continuous series of civic numbers, then one has to conclude all is Contrada San Silvestre, exactly as the place tag says.


** Full address printed on the ceramic sign on the driveway.
damianeue (2026-07-29 06:48:17+00:00): I can try to find the time to do a survey and map the addresses in the street.
About that 102 "Cnr", I think it is for Contrada. Do you have a photo of it? I will be by my colleagues this Thursday, I can give a look
pieterpaul (2025-12-28 20:28:29+00:00): op de website van de gemeente en op mapillary van maart 2024 staat deze aed nog, weet je waarom deze aed verwijderd werd? of misschien een recentere foto?

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1732145783975916&focus=photo&lat=51.22403466636371&lng=3.993838775018048&z=15.524818115504814&x=0.36598954731849387&y=0.48264445655424226&zoom=1.177133877427458

https://www.stekene.be/product/3063/aed-toestellen-in-onze-gemeente#:~:text=OC%20Koningshei%20Koewacht
wolfgang8 (2025-12-22 14:22:23+00:00): Falls das maxlength=5 nicht beschildert ist, wäre https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxlength:physical event. die passendere Variante um die in "souce:maxlenght" beschriebene Situation abzubilden.
DerKaiserschmarren (2025-12-22 21:58:17+00:00): irgendwo ist es beschildert, das habe ich aber vergessen zu dem Zeitpunkt. Es müsste hier ungefähr sein: 48.473899, 15.669122

Ich habe nur keine Ahnung mehr, was genau am Schild steht, mehr als 5 Meter Länge sind aber ziemlich sicher nicht möglich.

Wenn ich wieder mal vor Ort bin, werde ich mir die Lage nochmal genau ansehen. Ich füge ein Note für die Stelle hinzu.
DerKaiserschmarren (2025-12-22 21:59:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5101808
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:52:01+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/894385428 v3

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "chata v srdci přírody_near Praha"
---
Například více neutrální a faktická verze tvého popisu by mohla být: "chata v srdci přírody_near Praze"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 17:51:50+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176713210
pwbriggs (2025-12-23 02:16:43+00:00): Thanks! Yeah, It looks like address coverage is minimal in this area, so this is helpful. If you're interested and use Android, [StreetComplete](https://streetcomplete.app/) is pretty good and lets you add addresses and much more in a simple, user-friendly way.

But thanks for this edit, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please let me know if you have any questions.
seascorpio82 (2025-12-23 19:25:01+00:00): I would love to help.  I will get on this!
pwbriggs (2025-12-24 07:19:56+00:00): Awesome, thanks! Pierce County actually has some address data that's allowed for use in OSM, so I'm seeing what I can do to add some addresses around here on a medium scale. Very much a learning experience for me as well. But now the south end of 174th Ave has addresses!

Happy holidays!
mcliquid (2025-12-22 17:32:58+00:00): lines is deprecated, changed it to route_ref: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lines
ChrissW-R1 (2026-01-11 16:35:16+00:00): Was fixed in https://osm.org/changeset/176274952
Langlaeufer (2026-01-07 22:09:32+00:00): Hallo Charbi,
willkommen bei OSM. Schön dass du helfen willst die Karte zu verbessern.

Bitte keine explizite Maxspeed-Angabe bei living_street. "Schrittgeschwindigkeit" ist nicht eindeutig definiert. 7 km ist ein "Richtwert" aus der Rechtssprechung. Es hilft uns nichts, wenn jeder Mapper andere Werte für diese Straßen angibt. Die Schrittgeschwindigkeit wird bei living_street implizit angenommen.

Grüße Langläufer
Charbi1988 (2026-01-07 22:37:58+00:00): Moin Langläufer, 

in mehreren obergerichtlichen Entscheidungen wurde Schrittgeschwindigkeit ausdrücklich mit maximal 7 km/h gleichgesetzt. Beispiele sind Urteile bzw. Beschlüsse u.a. des:
OLG Karlsruhe (Beschluss vom 08.01.2018, 2 Rb 9 Ss 794/17)
OLG Brandenburg (Beschluss vom 23.05.2005, 1 Ss (Owi) 86 B/05)
OLG Köln (Beschluss vom 22.01.1985, 1 Ss 782/84)
Diese Gerichte hatten in ihren Entscheidungen die Obergrenze der Schrittgeschwindigkeit bei rund 7 km/h gesehen.

LG
Langlaeufer (2026-01-07 23:29:16+00:00): Der Punkt ist, wir wollen Schrittgeschwinngigkeit nicht als explizitenZahlenwert erfassen. Das  brauchen wir hier nicht weiter auszudiskutieren. Etliche Diskussionen dazu finden sich bereits im community forum.
Langlaeufer (2026-01-07 23:40:35+00:00): Z.b hier https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/maxspeed-walk/84500
Charbi1988 (2026-01-07 23:47:46+00:00): Deine Reaktion überrascht mich deutlich.
Ich habe ausschließlich auf bestehende Gerichtsurteile hingewiesen und zu keinem Zeitpunkt eine Wiederaufnahme oder die Einführung einer expliziten Maxspeed-Angabe gefordert. Sollte ich dir hier mit einem unbeabsichtigten Pflegefehler auf den „Schlips“ getreten sein, tut mir das leid. Trotzdem finde ich deine Reaktion im Rahmen des Community-Gedankens überzogen.
Langlaeufer (2026-01-08 00:00:15+00:00): Eine Forderung hab ich auch nicht gesehen. Die Urteile kenne ich wohl. Es gibt aber auch abweichende Urteile mit 5, 10 oder gar 15 km/h.
Ich wollte dich nur auf die Problematik hinweisen und darauf, dass es den osm Daten nicht hilft  maxspeed hier explizit zu erfassen.. Findet man auch im Wiki.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dliving_street.

Ich hoffe du hast jetzt keinen Groll auf mich, und ich stehe dir gerne für Fragen zur Verfügung Grüße  Langläufer
Charbi1988 (2026-01-08 00:03:34+00:00): Kein Problem, sollte ich fragen haben, komme ich gerne auf dich zu. :-)
Metzor (2025-12-23 23:59:47+00:00): Hi fxbse,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Though, looking at your precise changeset comments, I wonder if you've been mapping for a longer time already :-)

Anyhow, thanks for contributing, happy mapping, schöne Feiertage und einen guten Rutsch!
Metzor
fxbse (2025-12-24 22:18:05+00:00): Nope, but I guess I write comments like that because of my coding experience :)

Dir auch schöne Feiertage und einen guten Rutsch!
silversurfer83 (2025-12-23 23:09:06+00:00): und was ist nun an der Stelle?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176255682
Hugoren Martinako (2025-12-22 15:17:28+00:00): Revertido changeset por eliminar nodo estadístico, borrando su historial

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176268800
marcmarti (2026-01-05 09:03:28+00:00): Hello,
Your changesets to create distinct station nodes have created errors in the validator.
https://cdn.organicmaps.app/subway/france.html
Public transport application use this data, and there are problems if the data is broken. 
Thank you!
paul_sncf_connect (2026-01-05 10:50:10+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for reaching out. These changes are intentional and follow a consensus reached within the French OSM community regarding major railway hubs (Paris Nord, Austerlitz, etc.).

The Context: We are aligning OSM data with the Document de Référence des Gares (DRG), which is the official national reference document for railway stations in France. According to the DRG, entities like "Gare du Nord Surface" and "Gare du Nord Souterraine" (Underground) are distinct administrative entities with different Reference Codes (UIC), operating on different levels. Merging them into a single node creates factual inaccuracies against this official reference.

The Validator Issue: We grouped these distinct railway=station nodes into a single stop_area relation to maintain logical grouping for consumers (like Transilien/SNCF apps). The "Subway Validator" error "Stop area has multiple stations" seems to stem from a strict 1-to-1 expectation (Metro logic) which does not fit complex Heavy Rail hubs.

Regarding "Broken Data": Could you specify exactly how this breaks the application? Ideally, the parser should be able to handle multiple stations within a hub. We believe the tool should adapt to the reality of complex hubs rather than degrading data accuracy to fit the tool.

Technical Question: Does your parser/application fully support the public_transport=stop_area_group relation (PTv2 standard)? If yes, we could migrate to a cleaner structure (one stop_area per UIC, grouped in a parent stop_area_group). If not, we must keep the current configuration to ensure connectivity.
Langlaeufer (2025-12-23 17:10:42+00:00): Hallo Chari,
willkommen bei OSM. Danke dass du uns hilfst, die Karte zu verbessern.

operator=Dauerparkplatz? Heißst der Betreiber des Parkplatzes wirklich so?
Die Tankstelle ist als Punkt erfasst. Die Attribute sollten nicht doppelt erfasst werden. Ich habe sie daher vom Tankstellengebäude wieder entfernt
Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176257108
Pieter Vander Vennet (2026-01-18 10:45:48+00:00): Hey,

In je changeset heb je hier:

crossing_ref=zebra toegevoegd. Ik heb actief (bijna) alle crossing_ref in Belgie opgekuist ten voordele van `crossing:markings=zebra`, omdat die een duidelijkere betekenis heeft. Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Deprecating_crossing_ref voor wat er mis is met crossing_ref


Je voegt ook `cycleway:both:lanes=exclusive` toe. Wat is hiervan de betekenis? Dit is iets dat volgens mij geen meerwaarde heeft t.o.v. cycleway:both=lane
Xhattr (2026-01-19 21:23:37+00:00): Yep, je hebt gelijk. Ik was niet op de hoogte van je proposal, maar klinkt logisch voor mij. Wat de cycleway betreft, geen idee hoe ik dat gesubmit heb, het heeft inderdaad geen meerwaarde.
eggie (2025-12-22 11:25:55+00:00): Dag Chile, Het mag dan wel een calamiteiten route zijn, maar zal niet een speciaal aangelegde weg zijn.
Het is hier een voetgangersgebied. 
foot=no?????? 
Dus highway=pedestreian met emergency=yes

MVG
eggie
Dus de weg is dan een highway=pedestrian als je toch een route wilt creëren.
foot=no en access=no lijkt me echt verkeerd.
Chiel van de Logt (2025-12-22 11:55:44+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Excuus, ik had hem overgenomen van een andere calamiteitenroute. Bedankt voor de check en info.

Gr. Chiel
eggie (2025-12-22 11:58:35+00:00): No problem... Bedankt voor je reactie.
Het zal zo routeren in LiveNav.
Gr eggie
limes11 (2025-12-22 11:33:20+00:00): Hi,

how is this a change to "a more common tag" ?

healthcare:speciality=occupational has a far higher usage than occupational_therapy and comes with its own wiki-page.

Thanks for clarifying.

Best
thetornado76 (2025-12-23 18:33:53+00:00): Hallo,
Der Tag healthcare:speciality=occupational bedeutet eine Spezialisierung in Arbeitsmedizin. Hier handelt es sich aber um Ergotherapien bzw. Physiotherapeuten und das wird mit mit healthcare:speciality=occupational_therapy getaggt.
Yog Sot (2025-12-22 19:56:55+00:00): zrobiłeś błędy, nie rozwiązałeś ostrzeżeń przed zapisem. Naprawiłem to w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176279886

Zacznij wykonywać swoje zmiany na mniejszym obszarze i częściej zapisuj.
Udarian (2025-12-22 17:28:59+00:00): two questions, first why did you remove the building:levels=49 tag as it seems to be correct for the building. Second, it this the only business in the building as it seems like there could be others.

Happy mapping,
Udar
AnnaYushkevich (2025-12-22 17:54:22+00:00): Hello Udarian. Yes, you're right about the building levels (it is 49). I believe there are other businesses there as well. If you have more information about them, please feel free to add them. Thank you so much!
Best regards,
Anna
Dodko (2025-12-22 19:57:50+00:00): Už to bolo urobené 3 minúty pred tvojou zmenou.
Andreeeee (2025-12-23 08:46:26+00:00): @Dodko, zaujimave ze OSM nehlasil nejaky konflikt... Nevadi, hlavne ze je to tam :-)
schobbish (2025-12-23 21:30:12+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM! I'm marking this as Bad due to multiple issues in the address tags, opening hours, and phone number (phone number has been automatically fixed). Please see the OSM wiki (https://osm.wiki) for details on how to properly format these tags. Additionally, do not use the description tag for advertising.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176259239
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:52:03+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13394944183 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Dog grooming service in Lewisville TX"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-27 16:01:13+00:00): ❌ Fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/176379352

Thanks, schobbish
mueschel (2025-12-25 15:35:02+00:00): Hi,
could you check your edits? There are 4 signals with these tags - and their values are contradictory:

railway:signal:combined::type
railway:signal:combined:type
HaPe-CZ (2025-12-27 21:50:23+00:00): ok, thx
schobbish (2025-12-23 21:33:09+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM! I'm marking this as Bad due to issues in addr:street, opening hours, and phone number. Please see the OSM wiki (https://osm.wiki) for details on how to properly format these tags. Additionally, do not use the description tag for advertising.

For other mappers, accounts "10 Day Smiles" and "Emeka Abazie" are very likely related.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176259585
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:52:05+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13395009153 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Dental implant and cosmetic dentistry practice in Coppell TX"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-27 16:00:21+00:00): ❌ Fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/176379352

Thanks, schobbish