piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ntumaps (2026-05-07 05:34:09+00:00): Dear Admin,
Can we know who has the authority to decide the name of the station?  e.g who decide and add "Peng Kang Hill". We would like to liaise with them. 

Thanks
Best regards
kenken234 (2026-05-07 09:46:43+00:00): OSM is open data. The information is based on sources that are compatible with OSM open database license. (Read more https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright)

One of the sources (Singapore OneMap - https://www.onemap.gov.sg/) used to update OSM shows the station as "Peng Kang Hill" and it is by the Singapore Land Authority, which is a government statutory board.

Hope this helps and answers your queries.
tyfi (2026-04-01 04:56:03+00:00): Seems like old_ref was dropped 8 months ago. I didn't know enough context around here at the moment to decide whether to replace it or not, but I did fill in this name gap. This way was unnamed and between two other ways named Old State Highway N. I don't know if this name is correct, but I went with it for the sake of consistency
NeisBot (2026-04-01 05:12:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/9565669186 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Computer store"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Tienda de computadoras"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-09 10:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181089761
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
BC168 (2026-04-01 20:12:11+00:00): Moin,
access=no hat keine Wirkung, solange noch foot und bicycle=designated dransteht (spezifische Berechtigungen haben Vorrang vor allgemeinen Berechtigungen).

(Das access=yes vorher war allerdings auch falsch. Das hieße, dass außer Fußgängern und Radfahrern auch noch alle anderen (Reiter, Schwerlastverkehr usw.) dort entlang gedurft hätten.)

Ich ändere das mal so, wie es vermutlich gemeint war.
SomeoneElse (2026-04-01 06:44:56+00:00): The postcode differs from that on the website?
NeisBot (2026-04-01 05:57:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13697388033 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Lodge building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-09 10:33:09+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181089765
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-04-01 06:00:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13697385946 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Septic service facility"

#MapWithoutSpam
pwbriggs (2026-04-01 06:36:12+00:00): We want to have your business on the map, but in addition to the spam warning sent by the bot above regarding description=*, there are more issues with the following tags you added:

* addr:street=*
* opening_hours=*
* phone=*

Also it seems that this falls more under the category of plumbing than of janitorial work, so I updated craft=plumber as well.

Again, we appreciate you addition to the map, but please read the documentation before adding details in whatever format you'd like. I fixed this for you, but be warned that other volunteer mappers would not have been as kind.

Have a great day!
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-01 07:30:45+00:00): Thanks @pwbriggs

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180703426
NeisBot (2026-04-01 06:18:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 14 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1494924347 v1 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1494924346 v1 | 5 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180702790
NeisReview (2026-04-09 10:33:18+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180703011
LorenzoPesci (2026-04-14 07:50:56+00:00): ci sono 3 fermate in lungarno del tempio che non sono sulla linea del bus 31 (relation/2737389#)
NeisBot (2026-04-01 06:48:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1315723658 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Roofing contractor"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-09 10:33:12+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180705405
NeisBot (2026-04-01 06:56:17+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, Gagla.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added traffic signals crossing, university residential area, updated school name, removed outdated residential land use"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
maro21 (2026-04-01 18:24:57+00:00): Skąd pochodzi nazwa tej ulicy? Księżycowa jest prostopadła do tej drogi. Co to znaczy że ustawiłeś strefę zamieszkania żeby zapewnić bezpieczeństwo? Jest tam znak strefy zamieszkania?
Zwolnij_Tu_Mieszkają_Ludzie (2026-04-01 19:55:40+00:00): Zmiana klasyfikacji na Living Street (strefa zamieszkania) wynika ze stanu faktycznego w terenie. Przed końcem tej ulicy znajduje się pionowy znak drogowy D-40, który formalnie ustanawia tę strefę. Wprowadzenie tego oznaczenia w systemie ma na celu odzwierciedlenie rzeczywistych zasad ruchu: priorytetu pieszych, ograniczenia prędkości do 20 km/h oraz dbania o bezpieczeństwo mieszkańców, co jest kluczowe przy prostopadłym układzie względem ul.  Księżycowej.  Jeśli chodzi o nazwę ulicy, informacja ta pochodzi z wiedzy lokalnej. Jako osoba mieszkająca w bezpośrednim sąsiedztwie, potwierdzam, że nazewnictwo to jest utrwalone w tradycji okolicy i funkcjonuje w powszechnym użyciu (nawet jeśli nie wynika wprost z najstarszych map).  Warto również zaznaczyć, że zakwalifikowanie tej drogi jako serwisowej (service) byłoby nieścisłe. Droga ta stanowi bezpośredni dojazd do posesji mieszkalnych, a układ działek i numeracja adresowa są ściśle powiązane z tym ciągiem komunikacyjnym (większa część posesji jest przypisana do ul. Księżycowej, ale fizyczny dostęp i życie mieszkańców odbywa się właśnie tutaj). Ze względu na charakter zabudowy oraz wspomniany znak D-40, kategoria Living Street najlepiej oddaje faktyczną funkcję społeczną i komunikacyjną.
maro21 (2026-04-06 19:03:07+00:00): Co do strefy zamieszkania to, jeśli jest znak, to w porządku.

A co do nazwy: nazwy ulic dodajemy z oficjalnej bazy ulic i adresów. Dodatkowo, w przypadkach gdy odcinek drogi nie ma oficjalnej nazwy, ale jest tabliczka z nazwą ulicy, wtedy też dodajemy. Niestety w przypadku o którym tu piszesz, że nazwa pochodzi z wiedzy lokalnej to nie jest to źródło, które można zweryfikować. To znaczy mieszkańcy mogą mówić oczywiście jak chcą, ale tworząc mapę, obiekty i ich właściwości powinny być łatwo weryfikowalne przez innych mapujących którzy udadzą się na miejsce.
MichelleMapsss (2026-04-01 15:53:14+00:00): Hi Bernard,

Thanks for your message and for helping with  squaring out some of the area, that really helped!

I’m currently mapping on mobile, so I’m not entirely sure how to square up buildings or make them look as neat as you did. If there’s a way to do that on mobile (or an easier method), I’d really appreciate any guidance.

I’ve also made some new edits on the area, so if you’re able to take a look at those as well and help make them look more neat, that would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks again for your help!
Wildsharky (2026-04-03 06:20:32+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180757128
Dodko (2026-04-02 12:23:27+00:00): 143 je zapísaný ako ako garáž, po kolaudácii treba požiadať obec o pridelenie čísla domu, dom nie je zapísaný ani v katastri
eggie (2026-04-01 14:26:19+00:00): Dag AvN  Ik heb voorlopig de construction verwijderd. Het zal dus routeren.
Wellicht is er ook iets veranderd aan de fietspaden?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-01 14:30:10+00:00): Huidige situatie
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@50.89853,5.976852,19/?datastrip=20260302_SVNEO-01&sensorname=SuperView-NEO
eggie (2026-04-01 14:34:59+00:00): Mbv de sat foto de fietspaden ingetekend. Het is even wachten op een recentere luchtfoto of een aanpassing van de BGT.

Voorlopig routeert het.
Gr eggie
AvNVRZL (2026-04-01 15:11:08+00:00): Eggie,

Hartstikke bedankt! 

Hier zijn we als brandweer enorm mee geholpen, merci!

Fijne avond
Mxdanger (2026-06-03 21:42:20+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183615106
eggie (2026-04-01 09:56:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Zou de Chill-plek werkelijk tot 10 km hoog reiken?
En mogen er geen jongeren komen met een rolstoel?
Zou iemand van 19 worden weggestuurd?  :)

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-04-01 07:18:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/838861271 v5 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/838861272 v5 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180704885
iandees (2026-04-01 12:55:32+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7828139841 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180720953, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Taya_S (2026-04-01 09:47:45+00:00): All data has once again been reverted in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180711455

Please see: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/organised-editing-gsf-car-parts-uk/142037/33
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-01 09:49:40+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM.

Just a test?
NeisBot (2026-04-01 07:33:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1315723658 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Roofing contractor"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-09 10:33:16+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181089771
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-01 09:50:16+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM.

Just a test?
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-01 09:50:42+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180705715
Dimitar155 (2026-04-03 15:50:07+00:00): Здравей tolio,

Ако проявяваш интерес, може да добавяш оператора (мисля че е Екопак отговаря за цялата община Бургас), общия брой на цветните кофи (с count=*) и броя по цветове (с count:green=*, съответно yellow и blue).

На база тези тагове съм направил скрипт, който ги обхожда и добавя нужните recycling:* тагове. Например за жълтите добавя recycling:plastic=no, recycling:plastic_packaging=yes (приема само пластмасови опаковки, но не и всякакви пластмаси) и recycling:metal_packaging=yes (което е различно от метала за скрап).

За пример може да видиш node/6389363968, а повече информация има във форума - https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/136856/.

Поздрави,
Митко
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-01 09:48:47+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180705997
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-01 09:48:58+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180705715
arjunaraoc (2026-04-05 13:05:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Deleted by creator
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180706353
NeisBot (2026-04-01 07:57:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 19 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/36000171 v12 | 10 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1242742213 v2 | 9 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180706427
Dawid2849 (2026-04-01 12:10:12+00:00): Cześć

Na przyszłość proszę o nie ignorowanie ostrzeżeń edytora i więcej uwagi. Dość mocno przeciągnąłeś kilka dróg: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180706427/

Już to naprawiłem.

Pozdrawiam,
Dawid
bartgron (2026-04-01 15:06:17+00:00): I to nie było pierwsze przeciągnięcie dróg
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-01 09:47:35+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM.

Just a test?
NeisBot (2026-04-01 08:00:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 16 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/662771395 v5 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/662771397 v4 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/6204563622 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180706470
Jobo68 (2026-04-01 08:28:14+00:00): Could you please undo that? I was just trying to add the bank, but something must have gone wrong.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-01 08:56:44+00:00): Hallo Jobo68,

vielen Dank für die Antwort. Wenn gewünscht, kann ich das komplette Changeset hier zurücksetzen. Soll ich dies machen? Dies bedeutet dann aber, dass alle Änderungen verworfen werden.

Viele Grüße
Jobo68 (2026-04-01 09:27:34+00:00): Ja gerne. Ich trage die Sitzbank dsnn vielleicht später  nach.
NeisRevert (2026-04-01 09:32:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/180710853
where the comment is: "Revert of unintended geometry change"
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-01 09:33:37+00:00): @Jobo68 Habe das Changeset wie gewünscht zurückgesetzt.

#HappyMapping
XcoderB (2026-04-21 20:04:51+00:00): Hallo, wenn noch erkennbar, dann doch erst auf abandoned:highway stellen und nicht gleich löschen, oder?
Gruss, XcoderB
Michel4353 (2026-04-22 10:55:50+00:00): Ich habe mich wohl schlecht ausgedrückt. Als Weg ist es nicht mehr erkennbar. Im mittleren Teil sieht man am Terrain an, dass hier ein Weg war (und ich auf der richtigen Spur)
arjunaraoc (2026-04-05 13:06:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). tag  of highway=residential does not tally with  aerial image  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1494949233
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180706683
arjunaraoc (2026-04-05 13:09:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Tag of highway=residential does not match as per aerial image, seems more like a  farm road. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1494949702
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180706854
eggie (2026-04-01 10:00:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-04-01 08:09:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1494956546 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1494956545 v1 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180706955
NeisBot (2026-04-01 08:12:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1494960130 v1 | 7 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180707069
NeisReview (2026-04-09 10:33:18+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180775527
NeisBot (2026-04-01 08:15:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1494956546 v1 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1494956545 v1 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13697738927 v2
https://osm.org/node/13697738928 v2
https://osm.org/node/13697738916 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180707132
Dodko (2026-04-04 06:55:58+00:00): Elektronabíjačku je lepšie mapovať podľa https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
muruosm (2026-06-08 04:31:42+00:00): too  far from home, arent we?
NeisBot (2026-04-01 08:21:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/839655958 v1 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/839655984 v1 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7835216458 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180707321
iandees (2026-04-01 12:55:52+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7835216458 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180720968, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Cybermanx (2026-04-01 13:23:54+00:00): Ciao! Avevo cambiato il nome perchè quello è il nome presente sulle targhette agli ingressi del parco. Sono stato lì abbastanza di recente, che dovevo controllare alcuni dettagli mentre aggiornavo il mapping della zona residenziale di via Larga.
So bene che il comune, sia sul sito che in OpenData, lo chiama parco campagna, però nelle targhette il nome è Parco dello Spiraglio.
A quanto pare hanno cambiato il nome 10 anni fa, ma non riesco a trovare l'atto ufficiale, solo il comunicato stampa: https://www.comune.bologna.it/novita/comunicati-stampa/libera-della-giunta-allintitolazione-magnus-della-piazzetta-davanti-alla-pinacoteca
Da GMaps, si può vedere il cambiamento tra 2016 e 2017: prima c'era un cartello ovale verde, con "Parco Campagna Via Larga" (vicino al PalaCUS e alla piscina), ora la targhetta rettangolare bianca "Parco dello Spiraglio"
Per non perdere il dato, secondo me si può inserire Parco Campagna in old_name, mentre name=Parco dello Spiraglio
Buon mapping
Cavedagna (2026-04-01 13:29:24+00:00): Ciao, per me va bene, passando da lì non avevo mai notato i cartelli, io lo conoscevo così per cui pensavo fosse un nome informale (loc_name). Buon lavoro