piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
arjunaraoc (2023-12-18 00:41:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Your changset is reverted as Google maps can not be used as source vide https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145233194#map=18/13.01942/80.20758
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145232027
Rainero (2024-01-30 20:49:38+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146878592

Pic4Review mission 2648 sets wrong tags and uses outdated mapillary pictures.
muralito (2023-12-18 02:38:10+00:00): Eso existe, potrque a pie vas por ahi... Si lo sacas se rompe el ruteo de peaton.
UYMapper (2023-12-22 19:51:27+00:00): Ok, entiendo, es un sendero "virtual" a efectos del ruteo.
Antes sí existía ese sendero físicamente, pero fue alterado con una reforma hace años y ahora hay unos macetones bloqueando, al final de la calle.
muralito (2023-12-23 01:14:42+00:00): claro, porque los macetones bloquean autos pero no peatones, un peaton pasa por ahi igual que antes, el tema es que la forma de modelar eso es con el highway=footway, o bueno capaz que un highway pedestrian y los macetones tambien podria ser.

el punto importante a tener en cuenta es que OSM no es solo un mapa para manejar, son datos geograficos que se le dan distintos usos, produciendo distintas cosas, mapas para autos, para peatones, para ciclistas, etc.
UYMapper (2024-02-17 20:35:24+00:00): Ok
BubbaJuice (2023-12-19 04:31:43+00:00): Forgot to say I used street-level imagery from iD.
tyfi (2023-12-18 00:08:32+00:00): I added bridges and water features, too.
tyfi (2023-12-18 00:09:22+00:00): Also, I worked along MO 6 a bit in Maysville (southern terminus of A).
muralito (2023-12-18 01:48:06+00:00): El StreetComplete no se que pide, pero esto aparece como hecho por el iD.

El tema es que el amenity=police esta en el predio, asi que no va en el edificio porque no se debe duplicar. Esta la regla "One Feature, One Element".
UYMapper (2023-12-22 19:47:37+00:00): Como el edificio no está categorizado (qué tipo de edificio es), Street Complete pregunta eso.
Pero como S.Complete no brinda una categoría adecuado, lo hice en iD.
Ok, entiendo la regla que citás, pero a las personas que usan S.Complete, les va a seguir preguntanto qué tipo de construcción es, ya que falta ese dato.
muralito (2023-12-23 01:17:42+00:00): Lo que veas que el StreetComplete se puede mejorar lo podes plantear en su sitio https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues
tyfi (2023-12-18 00:18:57+00:00): I carried the secondary rating south to A's concurrency with Z.
tyfi (2023-12-18 00:20:30+00:00): 85 and A connect near Evona, but they do not overlap. They both end abruptly.
wolfbert (2025-03-26 14:25:30+00:00): source:maxspeed=Hohenems:zone:30 geht so nicht. Entweder es ist eine reguläre 30er-Zone, dann AT:zone30, oder die Zone gilt für das ganze Gemeindegebiet und ist speziell an der Ortstafel beschildert, dann AT:city_limit30. Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:source:maxspeed%3DAT:city_limit30
jeka p (2025-03-26 19:20:28+00:00): Hi!
es macht Sinn
TravellingSailesman (2024-03-20 20:57:36+00:00): Hello FaroRiver,

this road is a pedestrian road (checked during an on site survey). Why did you change it into a tertiary road?
TravellingSailesman (2024-03-20 22:01:53+00:00): In general: If you think that someone is doing wrong edits then please contact them and don't revert their edits silently, especially if you are doing armchair mapping (which I assume you do) and don't know the area.
FaroRiver (2024-03-22 14:41:30+00:00): Hello TravellingSailesman. I updated the classification of the pedestrian ways to tertiary here in order to connect it to the short dead-ending tertiary highway at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/255712840. I looked at the area again after your comment, and I can see now that I was mistaken and the ways are not traversable by vehicle. It looks like my changes have already been reverted. Your feedback is valuable to my team and I, and it allows us to improve our processes and workflows so that we can make more meaningful and accurate contributions to OSM, and I appreciate you reaching out. Thank you for your work to maintain a high standard of data quality in Cabo Verde, and happy mapping!
Coehill (2024-09-11 03:32:12+00:00): A handy way to do this in the future is the lcn=yes or the bike network relation since that road has green bike route signs that are also present in Guelph's official ArgGIS data.  It makes sense to keep it designated due to the presence of the green bike route signs.

I actually went ahead and updated the roads nearby which are part of the local bike route, as well as their speed limits. As a consequence, that should help your routing problems. :)

Please avoid using "designated" or any other changes to fix routing issues (unless they accurately represent what's on the ground) in the future which should be resolved in the app's code.
sjwhitak (2023-12-18 04:10:41+00:00): If I get confirmation that these are good, I will complete the remaining routes from RIPTA. I will make sure I verify no double-counted bus stops with GO-Sync more thoroughly next time. Changeset 145234379 found 2 bus routes that overlapped.
gscholz (2023-12-19 08:02:35+00:00): Hi armnd21,
this changeset has created a lot of errors regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-80.45559&lat=-1.06436&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145233891

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-12-21 08:06:01+00:00): Hi armnd21, 
these errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2023-12-22 07:18:18+00:00): Hi armnd21, 
due to your missing feedback I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
pantufla (2023-12-18 14:52:25+00:00): Hey, this is wrong. I've visited this place and they are not connected.
RideauCanal (2023-12-19 16:07:44+00:00): Hello pantufla, If you are referring to the connection that I added between https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232192977 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/730260027, I can now see that it is unclear if there is a connection at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6841329207. It appears that you have already updated this area (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145254851?node_page=13), thank you for making these updates and have a nice day.
Zandu (2023-12-20 05:07:53+00:00): building was not physically there.  Area has been renovated recently and this is now a parking lot.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145235133
tyfi (2023-12-18 03:48:18+00:00): This also added a relation for Route H and tweaked the existing one for F, as they had a concurrency on said overpass.
tyfi (2023-12-18 03:48:28+00:00): I also added footways on and near that overpass.
orthocircular (2023-12-18 07:42:31+00:00): Thank you for your contributions and welcome to OSM!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145235808
skquinn (2023-12-18 18:15:03+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

For future reference please note the following when adding new items:

1. Phone number should be in international (ITU-T E.164) format (i.e. +1 713 555 5555 or similar)
2. addr:street is for the street name only and should not be abbreviated. The number goes in addr:housenumber.
3. "Country" is not a standard key.
4. opening_hours has a specific format as described in <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/key:opening_hours> intended to be both human- and machine-readable. It is not freeform or "anything goes".
HikeAndMap (2024-02-11 21:59:39+00:00): Hi there, thanks for the contribution!

Please do continue adding data.
 
Baguio isn't part of the administrative province of Benguet. The boundaries are properly set in OSM. So addr:province and then adding data inside Baguio to the outside province which excludes Baguio would cause a potential conflict, especially since indeed there's also Baguio outside of Baguio city boundaries! So I'll remove the part in the address that this address would be outside of Baguio.

Most importantly are actually house number and street name, so if you're not sure, then just add those two additionally to the addr:city tag.

Anyway, thanks for the contribution and please do keep mapping :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145237052
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-18 05:30:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11428144015

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
arjunaraoc (2023-12-18 06:04:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145237962
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145237308
arjunaraoc (2023-12-29 08:40:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145237451
hoserab (2023-12-18 16:16:30+00:00): *added houses & addresses...
hackthemap (2024-07-21 17:41:04+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contributions! You changed the driveway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/971939638/history but highway=service should not have an address, only the building or an address node (or a POI) should have an address. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses
I removed the address from it.
Happy mapping!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-18 07:00:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231380318

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
flohoff (2023-12-18 10:02:04+00:00): Hi,
als feedback - Das routing hat hier weiträumig gechwenkt durch die Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkung:

Beispiel - Grün alt, rot neu:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=592961,609866

Hier die ganze Benachrichtigung:

https://gt.owl.de/pipermail/osm-owl-routeqa/2023-December/092037.html
arjunaraoc (2023-12-18 09:26:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia) You have changed name for one segment of the Road (Katraj Ambegaon Khurd Road ➜ Dattanagar Ambegaon road), Please check whether the adjacent sections also need renaming, if there is an official renaming. Please provide sources for  your edits as far as possible to facilitate review.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145239568
literan (2023-12-19 19:33:40+00:00): ознакомьтесь с руководством https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification

и прекратите вандалить карту. При продолжении буду обращаться в DWG за вашей блокировкой. 

Этот обрывок не является trunk. Вот когда запустят всю трассу...
woodpeck (2023-12-20 12:58:53+00:00): Dear Zorina Pachuau, in this edit you have re-drawn a number of boundaries in a detailed way; what is the source for this information? Surely these boundaries are not visible on aerial imagery?
StefanHRT (2023-12-18 10:02:46+00:00): Hallo, Frage: warum hast Du den Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1152661787 komplett verändert? Gemäß Note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3935614 und persönlicher Sichtung vor Ort ist der Name des Weges anders und u.a. für Fahrzeuge jeglicher Art (incl. Fahrräder) gesperrt, Feuerwehr ausgenommen. Wurde das jetzt in der kurzen Zeit neu beschildert? VG
silversurfer83 (2023-12-18 20:47:32+00:00): Moin :)

könntest du vielleicht noch einmal kontrollieren, was du mit dieser Straße hier gemacht hast:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30065358
Auf dem staatlichen Luftbild sieht das nämlich sehr nach einer Straße in einem Wohngebiet aus.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145240888
silversurfer83 (2023-12-18 20:48:12+00:00): Ah. Sorry. Was Wichtiges vergessen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Das wäre schön, wenn du das beachten könntest. Danke :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145240888
mono1969 (2023-12-19 05:07:59+00:00): An der Nernstraße habe ich nichts geändert.

Ich habe in Düsseldorf an der Hamburger Strße bei der Hubbrücke den Status von im Bau auf wieder befahrbar geändert.
silversurfer83 (2023-12-19 05:37:04+00:00): Interessant

Laut
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/30065358
Hast du die Straße bearbeitet. 
Wenn du dazu nichts weißt werde ich den alten Zustand wieder herstellen, wenn ich am Kaffee sitze
mono1969 (2023-12-19 05:42:19+00:00): Das kannst du gerne machen. Danke
silversurfer83 (2023-12-19 05:56:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145276628

Gemacht
user_8466505 (2023-12-23 23:09:30+00:00): Thank you for adding this place to the map! Glad to see Raising Cane's mapped with great detail. :)
flohoff (2023-12-18 10:03:16+00:00): Hier die routingänderungen dazu:

https://gt.owl.de/pipermail/osm-owl-routeqa/2023-December/092038.html
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-18 09:00:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5041437222

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bxl-forever (2023-12-18 13:35:37+00:00): Thanks for this.

In OSM we do not map only for car traffic but for all vehicles, this is important for routing.

So, this is a one-way street but are there additional signs to dispense cyclists from the restriction?  And is it only cyclists (M2) or cyclists+classA mopeds (M3)?

Thanks in advance.
jhamers (2023-12-18 14:13:12+00:00): Wel they ignore any signs anyway :-)

I just checked. Only cyclists are allowed
bxl-forever (2023-12-18 16:33:07+00:00): Thanks, I updated the tags.
Jakka (2023-12-18 09:23:36+00:00): Staat dit zo op de straatnaam bordejes ? Zo ja dan nog alle huizen hun straat adres aanpassen thx
jhamers (2023-12-18 09:31:06+00:00): Ja, dat staat zo op de naambordjes. Zeg je nu dat elk huis individueel moet aangepast worden ook....
Jakka (2023-12-18 09:37:09+00:00): in principe wel anders klopt de input niet....geen overeenstemming huis straat zal het voor jou doen . routeplanners van de wijs brengen ;)
jhamers (2023-12-18 14:00:23+00:00): Bedankt, maar hier klop toch iets niet vind ik. De kaarten zijn vaak niet heel correct, maar ik kan zien nu waarom een kleine aanpassing leidt tot zoveel werk. Dit is precies iets voor mensen met teveel tijd? De straat component van die adressen moet toch parented zijn aan de straat. Dus als de straat van naam veranderd, dat is dat. Gedaan.
Jakka (2023-12-18 14:05:55+00:00): Vermoed systeem structuur koppelt dat niet. Huis adressen kunnen zowel op vorm gebouwen gezet worden als op node punt. Maar als er geen huis adressen zijn dan wordt random een plaats gekozen als ik het goed voor heb ..
Jakka (2023-12-18 14:08:33+00:00): Jij werkt met browser ID editor.
Andere editors zoals josm die ik gebruik heb die aanpassingen in enkel eenvoudige stappen gedaan.
Ik had je meldde opgemerkt anders bleef dit ongewijzigd ....
andrashann (2024-01-15 21:56:13+00:00): Szia! Pusztán azért, mert teherautóval (fizikailag) nem lehet gyorsan menni a szakaszon, kérlek, ne tageld maxspeed címkével. Ez ugyanis tévedés: nincs 20 km/h óra sebességkorlátozás ezeken a szakaszokon. Ez a tévedés befolyásolja a tervezőket és a térképalkalmazásokat is, amelyek mindenkire _kötelező_ limitnek veszik ezt az értékeket így téves utazási időket jeleznek, esetleg emiatt rosszul tervezik az útvonalat.
julcnx (2023-12-21 07:06:53+00:00): Sorry Risa_dinda, your edits do not match any available imagery. What source did you use?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145242372
julcnx (2024-01-09 05:30:25+00:00): Reverted changeset as the original mapper failed to provide any additional responses.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146051849
Jakka (2023-12-18 09:15:41+00:00): Staat dit zo op de straatnaam bordejes ? Zo ja dan nog alle huizen hun straat adres aanpassen thx
jhamers (2023-12-18 14:15:40+00:00): Ja hier ook op bordjes :-)
luiswoo (2023-12-26 14:04:32+00:00): Что это за "вычисление маршрута" в виде служебной дороги поверх других дорог?
Lotto Togel Site (2023-12-18 09:17:09+00:00): lottotogel303.com daftar lokasi slot online paling gacor di indonesia
adreamy (2023-12-20 09:34:02+00:00): Vandalism is disruptive to the OSM ecosystem and can result in sanctions.
danieldegroot2 (2023-12-18 12:55:56+00:00): Hey there,

This can happen for various reasons
- Counties in OpenStreetMap can be derived from the (admin) boundary.
- County names are not required for county towns in postal adressing.
- (some) counties are (partially) historical, no longer administrative, which makes them look redundant.
- (counties are no longer required by international post in -for what I read on it- Northern Ireland, UK, etc. so some armchair mappers may not be used to it.)
- Most people are not willing to spend their voluntary time filling in such identical details for each building, POI and address.
- This could possibly be automized, though with exception of some addresses which include a non-geographical county name.
- The database is still missing many addresses, so for many this is a priority over adding such details.
- People are not adding them (nor is anyone telling them to), which makes it easy to overlook it as mistake to add or remove it.

Similarly, the "addr:country" and "is_in" tag is widely regarded as redundant, yet is still in-use in OpenStreetMap. See
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:is_in

I occasionally add it myself, but I also occasionally remove it. I add it on objects which are tied to a specific place or have an unconventional address (to make it as complete as possible, why not). I remove it from some other POIs as there I'm unsure of the added value(quality) of such a rarely, inconsistently added, largely redundant key.
In either case it could be added or removed as you'd want. Most geocoders already use the boundaries and most (large) boundaries are already in OpenStreetMap.

If you'd like to keep it it's fine with me. Note, it's possible some armchair mapper will occasionally come along and remove it.
You can discuss this with the local community to come to a consensus, though it is really minor topic..

Regards,

Daniel
PubUpdater (2023-12-18 14:02:53+00:00): Thanks for the information. 
I assume all of this is true of the City tag too?
For my application, I am updating address and contact information of licenced premises and importing them from OSM into my database. I use county as a search filter in my application, so that's why I fill it in. 

Do you know of a way to extract the county administrative boundary for a node? I don't see an easy way of doing it using the API.
danieldegroot2 (2023-12-18 23:06:57+00:00): "I assume all of this is true of the City tag too?"
Yes, though depending on where you look there may be also census boundary tagged as admin boundary, or no city boundary at all.

Smaller areas only very rarely have a boundary relation mapped, depending on their (legal) status.

"Do you know of a way to extract the county administrative boundary for a node?"
No, I'm not a developer, so I don't have experience with this. You should use a geocoder like Nominatim, or related application.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nominatim
If you need help, you can ask on the forums
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/help-and-support/7/none
Negjana (2023-12-27 20:56:28+00:00): Hallo, 200 km/h sind erst möglich wenn ETCS in Betrieb geht, was für den Sommer 2024 geplant ist.

Hab die Geschwindigkeit wieder auf 160 geändert.
eggie (2023-12-18 10:24:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback   bicycle=no hoeft niet op een wandelpad.
Ee wandelpad heeft een G7 bord en/of  is duidelijk alleen bedoeld voor wandelaars. Geen bord dan gebruiken we highway=path.
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Hallie Masseba (2023-12-18 13:21:13+00:00): Dat begrijp ik. Dit is duidelijk alleen bedoeld voor wandelaars die langs de lijn gaan kijken naar een wedstrijd, dus niet geschikt om te fietsen.

MVG Hallie
eggie (2023-12-18 10:35:00+00:00): Ik vraag me sowieso af of hier wel aangelegde wandelpaden zijn?
In Nederland beter PDOK actueel als achtergrond zetten. BING is 'outdated' en ligt er soms naast. 
Op de laatste PDOK luchtfoto lopen de paden in ieder geval anders.
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=18-12-2022&loc=52.31972%2C4.891156%2C19z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-09-05&acqid=20230905_105228_PNEO-03_1_1&sensor=Pleiades-NEO


MVG
eggie
Hallie Masseba (2023-12-18 13:24:24+00:00): Dank voor de tip aangaande PDOK.

Groeten, Hallie
Heideammer (2023-12-19 20:48:22+00:00): Ich kommentiere so gut wie nie das Mapping anderer, aber bei diesem und anderen heute hochgeladenen Datensätzen möchte ich doch ein paar Tipps geben bzw. Fragen loswerden.
- Sind die Namen der Bauernhöfe wirklich Eigennamen der Höfe oder die Namen der Eigentümer? Wenn ja, gibt es dafür eine freie Quelle? Ich weiß nicht, ob ohne Einwilligung tatsächlich das Eintragen der Namen erlaubt ist. Bei alten Hofnamen oder Namen die von außen sichtbar angeschlagen sind, ist das natürlich etwas anderes!
- Was befindet sich in breiten Lücken zwischen den einzelnen Landuse-Objekten? Also zwischen den Bauernhöfen, den Übergängen von Bauernhof zu Wiese oder Acker zu Wald? Für qualitativ hochwertige Geodaten ist ein klaffungs- und überlappungsfreies Flächenmapping unabdingbar. Ein wenige Meter breiter Streifen z. B. zwischen Acker und Wald sollte einer der Nutzung zugeschlagen werden, denn es geht in OSM um die überwiegende Landnutzung. Das gilt erst recht für zwei benachbarte Bauernhöfe. Deren Flurstücke grenzen unmittelbar aneinander!
- Ist die Heerdener Straße wirklich mit Gras bewachsen? Das sagt nämlich jetzt das Mapping von landuse=grass unter der Kreisstraße aus. Man kann gerne das Straßenbegleitgrün als solches erfassen damit einzeichnen, aber nicht die Straßenfläche. Die bleibt leer bzw. kann von anderen bei Bedarf als highway-Fläche gemappt werden. Ich habe Feldwege, die bewachsen sind auch schon mit landuse=grass unterlegt, aber bei Kreis-, Landes- oder Bundesstraßen entspricht das sicher nicht den Gegebenheiten vor Ort.
Vielleicht kannst Du die Punkte verbessern, danke!
literan (2023-12-18 17:16:16+00:00): это не название таблички
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-14 19:31:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147464049, 147464044, 147464035, 147464024 where the changeset comment is: revert von Edits, die auf noch nicht für OSM freigegebenen Daten der Landesvermessung RLP beruhen
eggie (2023-12-18 10:29:17+00:00): Geen G7 bord dan highway=path gebruiken. Dan wel aangeven bicyle=no of yes
Meestal in het buitengebied gebruiken we highway=path.
MVG
eggie
Hallie Masseba (2023-12-18 13:28:15+00:00): Ik begrijp het. Beter om path te kiezen en bicycle op No zetten