piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-03-28 13:57:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-03-28 14:42:46+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/164209308
opendcc (2025-03-29 20:08:54+00:00): Gleiches Thema - unberechtige Typänderung - bitte stoppe dieses Vorgehen!
opendcc (2025-04-02 04:34:36+00:00): Ich habe das korrgiert, die Straße bei Wolfsfeld wegen Ausbauzustand/Verkehrsbedeutung auf tertiary belassen.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 04:59:13+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535649
4004 (2025-03-30 00:24:18+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
вы уже все добавили, я только подправлю теги
bxl-forever (2025-03-28 15:08:28+00:00): Thanks for updating the name.
Just one thing: we do not repeat addresses on POI in Belgium, there is already an address point for house number 350 here, and the POI was already linked to it.
I fixed your edit, you don’t have to anything here, but please keep this in mind for future edits.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 04:59:07+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535648
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 04:59:00+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535645
grzegorz75jan (2025-03-28 15:17:53+00:00): :))
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164210353
marc__marc (2025-04-09 20:34:53+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/206748564
ce morceau là n'a pas aussi la même erreur de nom ?
Cordialement,
Marc
Eebie (2025-04-10 13:39:51+00:00): De straatnaam van het stukje straat zonder huizen is ook gecorrigeerd.
marc__marc (2025-04-10 20:33:21+00:00): Merci
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2025-04-12 17:14:44+00:00): Please attach speed cameras to the road.

Or create an enforcement relation.

See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dspeed_camera
rskedgell (2025-03-29 06:27:35+00:00): Hi, the value of the addr:city tag in UK addresses is usually the post town. Local authority names are not part of postal addresses. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom
Xvtn (2025-05-07 16:55:32+00:00): Hi! Not because of doubt of your observation, but because I'm curious and want to find them myself, how did you identify this ALPR? In this case, does your specified source of local knowledge mean you noticed it visually on the pole?
NeisBot (2025-03-28 14:48:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-03-30 11:49:24+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164225191
granitschädel (2025-04-23 13:07:36+00:00): Hello koldas, are your sure the narrow-gauge tracks in Frydlant east from Žitavská road are abandoned? They was still there at my last visit in November 2024.
eggie (2025-03-28 16:11:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
ilias_ (2025-03-29 00:10:04+00:00): You sent me a message asking me why I moved the node, I replied, maybe discuss with me before changing it back without saying anything?
borovac (2025-03-29 04:56:51+00:00): I did ask you why you moved. Your answer was that you did it so that the rendering of the city name was in the middle, according to you, the rendering of the name was too far north. Your change was due to name rendering, changes should not be made just for the map rendering. I did the research and found that the center of Rabat is in the vicinity of the location where I positioned the place node of Rabat.
ilias_ (2025-03-29 15:07:37+00:00): You're right, good talk.
mueschel (2025-03-29 10:49:58+00:00): Hi,
you added many 'NUMAR' tags here. Are these housenumbers? These should be tagged as "addr:housenumber".
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 05:19:35+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164660627
evdence (2025-03-30 14:13:29+00:00): it was an entrance with private access
HellMap (2025-03-30 15:17:41+00:00): Access tags cannot exist without a primary defining tag. So this then needs to be tagged as a gate or entrance or whatever it is. Also, is this an entrance to the building? It should then connect to the actual building.
Vinber-Pro (2025-05-20 10:34:54+00:00): Bonjour Maïlis,
merci pour toutes ces contributions :)

peut-être être plus explicite dans le commentaire. MAJ 2025 ne dit pas ce que tu as fait effectivement, par exemple ici "ajout site web"

à plus
literan (2025-03-29 10:27:37+00:00): и зачем вы это сделали?
NeisBot (2025-03-28 15:47:35+00:00): Hi Imre281, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 18 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=164213795
NeisReview (2025-03-28 19:33:50+00:00): 🤷‍♀️🤷‍♂️ Mapper deleted their own data.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-29 02:39:04+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17473
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 01:21:43+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164572399
Kovoschiz (2025-03-28 17:59:40+00:00): This is not enough. The routing is still broken by the banned turn.
mderrer (2025-03-29 12:23:23+00:00): vgl. auch die offiziellen Geodäsiedaten unter https://v.bayern.de/KXH7v
rs_mapping (2025-03-28 15:54:31+00:00): Zusätzlich habe ich zwischen dem Kreuz Wuppertal und Köln den namen "Hansalinie" komplett entfernt, da der Name nach allen Recherchen nur auf die Strecke zwischen Hamburg und dem "Ruhrgebiet" beschrieben wird.
TinPetreković (2025-03-28 16:03:15+00:00): Accidental node creation #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164214639
grzegorz75jan (2025-03-28 16:42:05+00:00): I support based on the discussion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162532179
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164214348
MrPot4to (2025-03-31 13:22:07+00:00): Diego este edificio está en la categoria de hospital, el cual es erroneo porque ahora es un edificio multipropósito. 

Dejame averiguar bien como actualizarlo y lo hacemos (tengo entendido que se ha mudado una sede de la UPSO a este edificio recientemente también)
Diego Krein (2025-03-31 15:48:33+00:00): Ok, muchas gracias, perfecto. Fue agregado por una nota de usuario
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 01:21:41+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164572398
BCNorwich (2025-03-29 07:44:28+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You tagged the outline of a residential area as a highway, this causes disruption to routing. I've made corrections.

Before uploading please heed any warnings like those given above.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2025-03-29 07:56:22+00:00): Other duplicated highway removed.
BCNorwich (2025-03-29 08:08:24+00:00): Even more duplicated highways removed, I think that all.
grzegorz75jan (2025-03-28 16:44:24+00:00): I support based on the discussion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162532179
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164214703
grzegorz75jan (2025-03-28 16:45:03+00:00): I support based on the discussion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162532179
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164214741
NeisReview (2025-03-29 21:26:25+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164230599
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2025-03-30 09:03:54+00:00): IMO you can connect the forests to the farmlands, I don't see the point in those gaps
BCNorwich (2025-03-29 07:52:39+00:00): Hi, Review, both highways are duplicates of existing highways which disrupt routing. 

I've removed the duplications.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2025-03-29 08:06:58+00:00): Hi, Several highways are duplicates of existing highways which disrupt routing.

I've removed the duplications.

Regards Bernard.
jtracey (2025-03-28 18:36:48+00:00): The site you gave doesn't resolve anywhere. What's the source for it?
NeisReview (2025-03-29 21:26:17+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164230599
Nathan_A_RF (2025-03-30 22:19:07+00:00): Hi, please add maxspeed:type tags if you are adding or changing maxspeed tags, makes sure the type of limit is known.
habi (2025-05-07 09:23:17+00:00): Ciao pygmy nick
Adding ";path" after "highway=track" doesn't add these paths to the "Walker's Haute Route" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3020521) but makes the track/path *not* render on OpenStreetMap anymore.
And since all the tracks were already members of the route and a hiking route can happily include highway=track https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack I modified your changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165928895

Happy mapping,
habi

PS: I'm looking at "weird" higway-Tags in Switzerland, that's why I'm here...
chris66 (2025-11-17 09:19:56+00:00): Abfahrtsmonitor-Link geht nicht mehr:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/660481714
ChrissW-R1 (2025-12-01 16:58:35+00:00): Absolut korrekt. Allerdings habe ich den Tag website gar nicht angefasst (Dies ist ein OpenStop-Task). Dieser ist seit 2018 unverändert.
Changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/62689353

Habe es aber nun auf die korrekten FIS-URL korrigiert: https://osm.org/changeset/175367853
ChrissW-R1 (2025-12-01 17:02:56+00:00): * korrekte
Michaall99 (2025-03-29 15:21:24+00:00): Cześć! Dzięki za Twoją edycję i chęć ulepszania OpenStreetMap. Widzę, że dodałeś plac budowy szkoły z tagiem landuse=construction. W OSM staramy się odwzorować aktualny stan terenu, więc jeśli możesz, sprawdź na miejscu lub poszukaj pewnych źródeł informacji. Jeśli budowa jeszcze się nie rozpoczęła, lepszym wyborem będzie landuse=greenfield, który oznacza teren przeznaczony pod zabudowę. Note oraz check-date możesz zostawić. Pozdrawiam.
ogm4t (2025-03-29 16:08:17+00:00): Budowa się rozpoczęła kilka tygodni temu, jednak brakuje na jej terenie tablicy z informacjami. Pozdrawiam.
ogm4t (2025-03-29 16:20:17+00:00): Dodam, że na okolicznej drodze są znaki "uwaga budowa", teren jest ogrodzony, drzewa wycięte, lany jest beton, zrobiono wjazd z kostki, i pracują tu robotnicy każdego dnia.
Patchanka (2025-03-29 12:40:27+00:00): bonjour
merci pour les mises à jour.
Je me questionne sur ce tronçon de piste cyclable que vous avez ajouté : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1372454010
Il est nouveau ?
Sur ces photos de 2023 on ne voit pas de piste à cet endroit, mais ça a pu changer depuis : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=18.575360348671403&lat=43.469907999999975&lng=-1.5509564999999839&pKey=1389033948559635&focus=photo&dateFrom=0101%2F2023&menu=false
TinPetreković (2025-03-30 13:11:44+00:00): Accidental node creation #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164287117
stosh77 (2025-04-24 06:38:20+00:00): Revised.
b-jazz (2025-03-29 06:35:09+00:00): Where can I get the imagery used for this change? All of the rough drawn in seems more like clutter from the imagery that I'm using (Bing) and could easily be left out and still convey all the important information with fairways and greens.
wermak (2025-08-13 00:34:54+00:00): Diese Straßen gerade für Lkw sind keine highway=service. Wieder korrigiert auf highway=unclassified.
wies1 (2025-03-28 17:25:03+00:00): Hallo, 
ich sehe gerade, dass du in diesem Changeset die Hailo Welt Adressenmäßig ergänzt hast. Dies hattest du angesprochen. Da hatte ich tatsächlich die Hausnummer übersehen gehabt, die in Hessen Alkis genannt war.
Gruss
wies1
Herwescheluc (2025-04-06 17:25:03+00:00): Hallo, wies1,

innerhalb der letzten Woche habe ich so einige von diesen Fällen in Deiner Arbeit gefunden.

Kennst Du eigentlich den tag "nohousenumber"? Den hast Du öfter übersehen. Einfach mal das wiki bemühen. 

Der wird recht häufig genutzt, wenn wirklich keine Hausnummer vergeben wurde, aber eine Angabe der Adresse sinnvoll ist, wie z.B. bei einer Feuerwehrstation, einem Friedhof oder ähnlichem.

Bitte also demnächst nur Deine Dinge ergänzen und andere genauer prüfen oder gleich belassen, wie's ist...

Grüße aus Herborn

Andreas
Nakaner (2025-04-19 17:09:06+00:00): Hallo,

gelegentlich kontaktieren Infrastrukturbetreiber den FOSSGIS e.V. oder die OSM Foundation und verlangen die Löschung von Leitungen. Meistens lassen sich solche Begehren mit Verweis auf vor Ort überprüfbare Fakten (Flugzeichen usw.) abwehren.

Die von dir angegebenen Quellen kann ich jedoch nicht überprüfen. Welche "Plans" hast du verwendet und wo ist die Freigabe für OSM dokumentiert? Welche Luftbilder hast du verwendet? Weder Mapbox noch Bing oder die beiden Esri-Layer enthalten im Bereich Bönnigheim Schlossfeld Informationen, aus denen man den Leitungsverlauf ablesen kann.

Viele Grüße

Michael, der heute wieder einen Teil der verlegten Leitung mit dem Garmin gemappt hat
Nakaner (2025-05-27 21:41:53+00:00): Hallo,

auf meinen obigen Kommentar habe ich bislang noch keine Antwort erhalten. Sollte das so bleiben, werde ich der Data Working Group zur Entscheidung vorlegen müssen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Nakaner-repair (2025-08-18 12:41:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170614902 where the changeset comment was: "Revert changesets 164216585 and 162577298 due to copyright violation. The user did not respond to questions asked via changeset comments."
nleanba (2025-04-20 08:39:19+00:00): Hi Kountori,
ich denke, der tag natural=tree_row bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230495988 gehört dort nicht hin, es ist ja nur Waldrand und nicht eine also solche erkennbare Baumreihe. Kann ich den wieder entfernen?
Kountori (2025-04-21 06:27:14+00:00): Hallo nleanba,
Danke fürs genaue Hinsehen. Diese Änderung hat sich wohl aus Versehen erwirkt. 
Bitte wieder entfernen.
TrickyFoxy (2025-03-28 23:24:52+00:00): Но зачем вы её добавляете?
YomanNH (2025-04-08 12:39:55+00:00): Przywróciłem 25 wiat przystankowych, które usunąłeś. Nie usuwaj istniejących obiektów.
Dodko (2025-05-14 14:27:26+00:00): Ak sú adresy v budove, nedávajte ich duplicitne do POI.
EfreetSK (2025-05-15 06:45:02+00:00): Chápem, moja motivácia bola že ak by niekto scrapoval len POI tak by nevidel na akej adrese sa napr. podnik nachádza. Ale doštudujem to a nebudem to tak dávať ak to je antipattern.
Ďakujem za review.
Dodko (2025-05-15 07:16:11+00:00): Slušné aplikácie preberú adresu z budovy a zobrazia ju aj pri POI.

Vami pridaná adresa nemala súpisné číslo ani mestskú časť Alžbetin Dvor, a na budove je kompletná adresa.
Dwain Zwerg (2025-04-04 13:45:49+00:00): Die Linie 73 geht nur noch mitten in die Elbe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25445792#map=15/53.53435/9.97717
Kannst du das, was du da kaputt gemacht hast, bitte reparieren?
G4rden3r (2025-04-04 15:30:44+00:00): Moin,

also ich weiß nicht ganz genau was du meinst. Die Linien sind vollständig und richtig.
Richtung Ernst-August-Schleuse : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/166965
Richtung Landungsbrücken: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1834765

Der Way hat nichts mit der Route zutun.
b-jazz (2025-03-29 06:50:31+00:00): Thanks for helping map golf courses. There are some serious problems with your edits however and your mapping needs to be fixed going forward so you don't continue to step on the efforts of others. For starters, read the following wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history on how important it is to *not* delete map elements when you should be updating them instead. You have been breaking multipolygon relations when you do this. You should also read the golf_course wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls) and the general wiki on how to properly work with multipolygons (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#iD). Until you understand these issues, please refrain from modifying other mapper's work. Thanks. If you have any questions, please reach out and we'll gladly help you.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-27 12:52:16+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173836986
Stalker61 (2025-03-29 11:33:59+00:00):  А поскромнее с охватом территории никак?
Đuro Jiří (2025-03-30 20:27:34+00:00): Curiosità, perché hai cancellato nome sul chiosco?
evillz (2025-03-30 20:37:03+00:00): Non è il nome del chiosco. "Corriere della sera" è il nome del giornale
Adzel Magon (2025-03-28 17:54:10+00:00): Magon, Tantangan South Cotabato
TrickyFoxy (2025-10-05 18:35:40+00:00): 👋  Is it true that the date=* tag you added is the person:date_of_death=* tag?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:person:date_of_death
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 01:21:35+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164572395
NeisReview (2025-03-29 07:20:22+00:00): #NodeDragging

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for contributing to the map. I’ve reviewed your recent edits and noticed that at least one node of a way was moved. This can sometimes happen unintentionally, and it’s led to some unusual intersections or overlaps between street segments and other map elements.

Could you kindly confirm whether these changes were intentional or if they may have been made by mistake?

Thank you, and I look forward to your response!

---
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5878699919
LudovicG (2025-03-31 04:44:15+00:00): Bonjour,
Je suis passé devant OBR le lendemain de votre ajout mais j'y ai vu une annonce "à vendre" sur la vitrine. Vous l'aviez vu ouvert ?
Vétérini (2025-03-31 10:35:14+00:00): Bonjour Ludovic, merci pour votre vigilance ! Mon ajout n'était pas très "frais", j'avais fait une reconnaissance des magasins rue Colbert il y a environ deux semaines, et OBR m'avait semblé ouvert. J'avais simplement oublié de l'ajouter sur OSM à ce moment-là, donc j'ai fait mon ajout de ce week-end à partir d'une photo d'il y a deux semaines. Je l'ai passé en shop=vacant, merci encore !
Dimitar155 (2025-03-31 06:45:28+00:00): Hi donovaly,

There is no need to put addresses on shop nodes, when the building in which they are located has an address. The address gets "inherited" from the building.

Also if and when that shop moves, someone will drag it's node across the city and forget to change the address (might've done it at least a few times :) ).
NeisReview (2025-03-29 07:14:44+00:00): #NameTag

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I’ve taken a look at your recent edits, especially those involving name tags. Some of the names you’ve added caught my attention, as they seem a bit unusual. As noted in the OSM Wiki, the name tag should contain only the actual name of the feature—not descriptions, types, locations, family names, addresses, or other attributes.

Could you please confirm whether these entries were intentional or possibly added by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

---
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:name
Camping de la cascade (2025-03-29 07:30:41+00:00): Hello,
 the names of the plots are intentional because they are the names of some of the campsite's accommodations.
rskedgell (2025-03-29 06:06:52+00:00): If you lose information about the number of lanes, turn lanes and a mandatory cycle lane, is it really a "correction"?

Repaired in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164234942
felipeeugenio (2025-03-28 21:00:52+00:00): Hola. Gracias por las ediciones.
Pero no es recomendable realinear todo en base a una sola imagen satelital (bong en este caso). Hay varios proveedores, cada uno con su desplazamiento. no sabemos exactamente cuál es el correcto. Y más encima cambian todos los años,
saludos
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-29 01:48:01+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17471
eggie (2025-03-28 18:55:53+00:00): שבת שלום. 

Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   De naam heb ik conform de website aangepast en religion=jewish toegevoegd. 
De info heb ik overgezet naar het gebouw... Dan zal dat straks bij rendering als Sjoel herkenbaar zijn. 

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 03:19:11+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164573548
NeisReview (2025-03-29 21:21:50+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164230808
jm428 (2025-03-28 23:36:02+00:00): I reverted this changeset and your previous one. Renaming a massive trail like this to "Private property" is not the correct approach. I would suggest either adding a fixme tag with more details about where the trail goes through private property or adding a note to the map where the trail goes through private property.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164230808
felipeeugenio (2025-03-28 21:02:54+00:00): Hola. Es una construcción esto?
saludos
rskedgell (2025-03-29 06:24:57+00:00): Another mapper broke the access tagging on the bus loop in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159276247 - now fixed so that it's bus=designated + vehicle=private (per the road markings visible in the aerial imagery).

Thanks for adding the one way tag.
berland (2025-03-28 19:10:51+00:00): Denne mangler noe Relation med fell
berland (2025-03-28 19:11:48+00:00): Forsøkt fikset i 164222072 men usikker på om det medførte større feil..
berland (2025-03-28 19:10:03+00:00): Det mulig denne fiksen også gikk litt galt..!
Filip009 (2025-03-29 16:55:55+00:00): Zdravím, náučný chodník sa pridáva pomocou relácie (medzi možnosťami vľavo dole)
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 05:28:04+00:00): DWG revert - sock-puppet account

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164402167
bxl-forever (2025-03-29 09:31:33+00:00): Hello,

Why do you want to add indoor=yes when tunnel=building_passage is already set?

Did anyone instruct you to do such a thing?
JannesBraet (2025-03-29 12:06:48+00:00): Because wandrer doesn't look at the tunnel=building_passage tag and this is also a valid tag that is definitely true in this case. I don't see the issue with having two tags that support eachother?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:indoor