piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bxl-forever (2024-08-23 13:08:45+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM.
You seem to have changed the access permissions on several ways in the past weeks.
We got reports about broken routing because of those changes.
Remember: if you set bicycle=no or foot=no on a road, then all routing engines will remove it from the results… but it is your responsibility to make sure to add alternative connectors to the existing cycle- or footpaths.  Navigation engines will never assume that people may just "jump" to a nearest road, it only uses existing roads and paths.
I’ll try to fix this one and put your other changes for further review.
Have a nice day.
SanRemo76 (2024-08-23 17:05:25+00:00): Hello, I'm really sorry if I gave problems to some routing programs. It was not my intention. But every change I made, there are bike/pedistrianlanes beside the road, so that's why i thought route planners will be ok with it. All the roads where i put "bicycle allowed = no" are roads where cycling is in real not allowed. Maybe I have to learn more on how to use/change things on OSM more, because it is still new for me to use.
I use most of the time komoot for planning my routes, and there where I changed the setting on OSM, Komoot will automatically put my route on the cycle lane, but probably some places it does not work. Again my apologies for this inconvinient. If you have any tips, or a good way how to learn more about using OSM, I would like to know.
With kind regards, De Kunst Patrick.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-07 06:40:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12096542567
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833789146

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2024-08-09 10:38:58+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping.

E: Buildings not squared.

H: Included a yard of clearing.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154919912
Fraxi (2024-08-07 08:00:20+00:00): Здравейте! Благодаря за редакциите. Моля, запознайте се каква е практиката за маркиране на улици. В случая не трябва да има "ул." пред "Арда".
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bg:WikiProject_Bulgaria#%D0%98%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B8_%D0%B8_%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B4%D0%B8
Frans S (2024-08-09 10:05:13+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping.

B: Overlapping buildings.

C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.
D: Connecting Nodes to other features.

E: Buildings not squared.

G: Included the shadow of the building.

H: Included a yard of clearing.

High building(s) incorrect mapped. See par 20 chapter About Buildings



Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-07 06:50:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12096540377
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12096540375
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12096540374
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12096540373
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/832568001
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/832565315
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/832566000
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1003674091

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2024-08-09 09:58:14+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping.
C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.
E: Buildings not squared.
G: Included the shadow of the building.

H: Included a yard of clearing.
High building(s) incorrect mapped. See par 20 chapter About Buildings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154920028
user_7130456 (2024-08-12 12:49:31+00:00): 更改集太大了
rhhs (2024-08-07 09:51:20+00:00): Hi King of the Road, thanks for editing OSM!
However, if a road is so bad can only be passed by SUVs, the way to tag this is smoothness=very_bad

motor_vehicle=no means it's not allowed to be used by cars

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Frans S (2024-08-08 12:36:16+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping.

B: Overlapping buildings.

C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.

D: Connecting Nodes to other features.

E: Buildings not squared.



Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
Frans S (2024-08-08 12:14:29+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping.

B: Overlapping buildings.

C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.

D: Connecting Nodes to other features.

E: Buildings not squared.



Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
Frans S (2024-08-08 09:58:28+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping.

B: Overlapping buildings.

C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.

D: Connecting Nodes to other features.

E: Buildings not squared.



Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
Frans S (2024-08-08 10:25:00+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping.

B: Overlapping buildings.

C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.

D: Connecting Nodes to other features.

E: Buildings not squared.



Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-07 07:00:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2944274662
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305681222

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
大山かなめ (2024-08-07 06:57:39+00:00): 住宅と道路でノードを共有している、同じ住宅が2個重なっているなど常軌を逸していたため「異常な建物」の修正と書いています。
Udarian (2024-08-09 03:17:20+00:00): Generally when mapping running tracks both the way in the center of the running track and the area (usually multipolygon) describing the area it retakes up are both left there so way 1306069618 probably shouldn’t have been deleted. Just a note for the future.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
flohoff (2024-08-09 13:03:23+00:00): Reverted - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155008638
Waldbetrieb (2024-08-14 10:00:27+00:00): Wir müssen hier leider etwas klar stellen:

Wald hat immer einen Eigentümer und der Eigentümer dieser Waldfläche möchte hier einfach keine Wege, Trampelpfad oder ähnliches.

Das Betreten von Wälern ist  gesetzlich geregelt, es gibt diverse Betretungsverbote, hier gilt das  Landesforstgesetz NRW §3  ergänzend zu Bundeswaldgesetz §14 und die entsprechenden Natur- und Jagdgesetze. 

 Fahrradfahren (oder genauer gesagt das "Fahren" generell, d.h. egal womit) ist gemäß  Landesforstgesetz NRW §3  nur auf befestigten Wegen erlaubt, im vorliegenden Bereich sind das nur Schotterwege und asphaltierte Wege.

Auch aus diesem Grund sind diese Rückeschneisen schon teilweise mit Baumstämmen versperrt, die immer wieder illegal beseitigt werden. Aufgrund der Eintragung bei OSM und anderen Online-Karten werde diese Schneisenals illegale Mountainbikestrecken genutzt, was nicht nur gefährlich und verboten ist, sondern auch wegen dieser ständigen Nutzung wird der Bewuchs geschädigt. 

Rückeschneisen sind einfach keine Wege, Pfade oder sonstiges und werden es auch durch Benutzung nicht. Auch diesem Grund ist die Löschung bei OpenStreetMap richtig und wir bitten sobald Sie ein Fahrrad o.ä. benutzen auf den befestigten  Wegen zu bleiben und  bei OSM oder anderen keine Rückeschneisen mehr als Weg einzuzeichnen.

Weitere Auskünfte erteilt:

Herzog von Ratibor’sches Forstamt Corvey
Forstamtsleitung L. Hebbecker
Corvey 1
37671 Höxter
forstamt@corvey.de
osmviborg (2024-08-07 07:14:35+00:00): Jeg tror du skal vente lidt, N.J. Haustrups Vej er ændret markant: https://vis.dataforsyningen.dk/navngivneveje/848b2a69-2dd5-4d34-872c-dca5e2ae8c20?format=json
AndreasOdense (2024-08-07 07:51:06+00:00): Det var også det jeg kom frem til. Der sker vist store ændringer af vejene når Novo for alvor begynder at bygge.
map per (2024-08-13 19:13:57+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
infeeeee (2024-08-08 10:53:05+00:00): Szia! Javítottam a rendelőt, így már meg fog jelenni a térképeken.

A healthcare:speciality (magyarul szakorvosi ellátás) címke viszont nem szabadszavas, hanem az adott szakterület angol nevét kell beírni, ha nincs ott az előre beállított listában.

Itt vannak a pszichológiához gyakran használt értékek: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare:speciality#Specialities_for_healthcare=psychotherapist

Összes érték az egész világról itt van felsorolva: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/healthcare:speciality#values jobb felül tudsz keresni is köztük.

Amit korábban beírtál ide azt átmásoltam a description/leírás mezőbe.

Kérlek ezekből keress valamit ami leírja a szakterületeteket. Ha segítség kell írj nyugodtan.

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
aseidel (2024-08-13 13:03:57+00:00): Lieber Paul Hölscher,
bitte bei unbeschilderten hw=path oder hw=footway ergänzen, dass es kein Schild gibt (traffic_sign=none), siehe Beispiel 2 in unserer Tagging-Beispielsammlung).
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
jeslop (2024-08-07 14:41:16+00:00): Ciao SteDep, qual è la fonte per l'estensione di questa strada? Le immagini PNOA che dici di aver utilizzato non mostrano questo nuovo tratto, né appare in Bing, Mapbox o Esri. Ti sarei grato se potessi indicare fonti valide per questa modifica.

Distinti saluti,

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
SteDep (2024-08-07 14:54:39+00:00): Abito in c/ de Pando e ogni giorno uso questo pezzo di strada per andare al supermercato. Ti posso mandare delle foto?
jeslop (2024-08-08 14:46:32+00:00): Grazie per le informazioni SteDep. Saluti
SteDep (2024-08-09 15:54:55+00:00): Grazie a te!
FajrAl (2024-08-19 04:14:48+00:00): Usahakan untuk edit dalam cakupan kecil kemudian save
mikles (2024-08-12 21:09:58+00:00): что, проехал?
mikles (2024-08-12 21:19:25+00:00): неправильно это рисовать новые тропинки вместо того чтобы подвинуть старые, и не сдвинуть болото
mikles (2024-08-12 21:26:00+00:00): неправильно это просто обклацывать треки. Минимум, надо посмотреть Мапиллари. Смотреть так же как и Ютуб, через Впн. Посмотреть на даты, посмотреть на даты в треках плагином для Джосма gpxinfo.
mikles (2024-08-12 21:39:38+00:00): ничоси! Проехал, вижу. Ну и как ты считаешь это нужно мапать: в ситуации когда катишь от одного поезда до другого через непролазные завалы, через натурально отсутствие тропинки, пролезание под забором?
mikles (2024-08-12 21:53:49+00:00): ну и такие банальные несоответствия как cutting уже заросший с царских времён и естественно не могущий совпадать с треком обхода вокруг завалов, 1 метр ширина, несоответствие конфигурации взаимных пересечений тропинок которая есть ориентир а не среднеквадратичное отклонение вдоль всего трека, особенно когда на настолько заросшую тропинку надо выйти
mikles (2024-08-13 05:54:35+00:00): есть префикс was:highway= если хочется сохранить навека память в Осме об этом тракте
bxl-forever (2024-08-07 12:56:03+00:00): In de vorige situatie werd een uitzondering voorzien voor fietsers.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1089651611943352

Bevestig je dat er hier *geen* M2-borden bestaan, dus enkel "oneway=yes" zonder "oneway:bicycle=no"?
Thorum (2024-08-07 13:02:36+00:00): Was inderdaad vergeten dat te bekijken. Ik loop vanavond nog eens langs en update het.  Bedankt!

(vorige situatie was overigens grotendeels dubbelrichting, is dus al tijdje verkeerd)
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-07 08:33:46+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2946782070
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2946789953
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439327883
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439343151

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Piotr Strębski (2024-08-07 11:37:53+00:00): poprawione, dzięki!
Nathan_A_RF (2024-08-18 12:12:09+00:00): Hi, the correct tag for a 20 zone is 'maxspeed:type=GB:zone20'
Pink Duck (2024-08-18 19:15:11+00:00): Thanks for correcting it.
eggie (2024-08-07 09:28:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
DD1GJ (2024-08-08 07:08:31+00:00): Hallo Klopstein,

danke für die Korrektur. Allerdings hattest Du an das feststehende Haus eine neue Adresse geschrieben, was total falsch und verwirrend ist. Ich habe daher die korrekte Adresse wieder hergestellt und für das Standesamt einen neuen Eintrag an der richtigen Position erstellt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12098304620

Weitere Informatonen findest Du unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim
houtari (2024-08-16 00:07:36+00:00): I guess this is  a duplicate with this object https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5008151187 that was already there. "Korsu" in finnish means military bunker.
desperado74 (2024-08-16 07:00:25+00:00): Okay, but it seems to have the wrong category... In German language it's listed under "Stollen" which means tunnel or gallery...i guess it should be marked as a military history place, there are also bunkers and trenches there
houtari (2024-08-16 19:18:01+00:00): Yes, I guess the previous object tagging wasn't spot on. I'll put it on my todo list to combine the two objects. I also created a map note of this task ... https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4385596
emvee (2024-08-25 11:19:48+00:00): Hoi Tim,

Bedankt voor bijwerken van de Zaanweg na de herinrichting!

Ik hou me bezig met het aanvullen van maxspeed binnen OSM (zie https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/provincie-van-de-maand-noord-brabant/115435) en zo kwam ik op de Zaanweg uit.

Nu zie ik dat nu jou wijziging de Zaanweg geheel 30 km/h is maar als ik in de .pdf's kijk (bedankt voor het linken daarvan) dan lijkt me alleen het meest westelijke stuk 30 km/h, het middendeel 50 km/h, 30 km/h adviessnelheid en het meest oostelijk deel nog steeds 50 km/h. 

Is de werkelijk anders dan wat in de pdf's staat?

Groeten,

Martin.
emvee (2024-08-25 11:39:57+00:00): De link is niet correct, niet Noord-Brabant maar https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/provincie-van-de-maand-noord-holland/116901
TimuitWormer (2024-08-25 12:22:11+00:00): Hoi Martin,

bedankt voor je scherpte! Ik denk dat je gelijk hebt, maar zal morgen nog even langsfietsen en in werkelijkheid kijken.

Tim
TimuitWormer (2024-08-26 18:24:17+00:00): Hoi Martin,

vandaag even gekeken. De borden begin en einde zone 30km/u staan ter hoogte van Zaanweg 51. Alles ten westen daarvan is dus 30km/u. (wijkt af van PDF)
Het bord adviessnelheid 30km/u heb ik alleen rond Zaanweg 36 gezien, en geldt voor alles ten oosten daarvan. (klopt met de PDF)

Als we perfect willen zijn kunnen we de laatste 50m ten westen van de Zaanbrug nog op 50km/u zetten als maximumsnelheid.

Tim
ps: momenteel is het hele stuk vanaf de Zaanbrug tot de Stationsstraat 30km/u, maar dat lijken tijdelijke borden. Ik heb het hierboven enkel over borden die echt definitief lijken.
emvee (2024-08-26 21:18:42+00:00): Bedankt voor het nakijken!

Het lijkt me het handigst als jij het gewoon bijwerkt, er is nog voldoende werk te doen in de rest van de gemeente Zaandstad, net nog bezig geweest ;-)

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=155802982

Groeten,

Martin.
TimuitWormer (2024-08-27 17:50:55+00:00): Goed bezig Martin!
Ik heb de snelheidslimieten aangepast: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155844913

Tim
eggie (2024-08-07 09:30:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-08-07 09:35:03+00:00): Dag Robbert... Hier staat nergens een bord motorvoertuigen verboden.
Er staan wel paaltjes.
moped, mofa per default en waarschijnlijk motorcycle (indien getagd met yes)   kunnen hier gewoon passeren. 
Ik zal het paaltje toevoegen en het verbod verwijderen. Wanneer er een C12 bord is gekomen laat het even weten.
MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2024-08-07 09:21:10+00:00): Ooops, it seems that some of your names are a bit unusual ...

Amount=1
#NeisLab #Minutely #Naming
pitscheplatsch (2024-08-10 10:41:58+00:00): Thank you for your mapped POIs.

#HappyMapping
cuzi (2024-08-09 08:38:51+00:00): Se este for o nome da pessoa que mora na casa, então remova o nome. Informações pessoais não devem ser adicionadas ao Openstreetmap
cuzi (2024-10-16 09:26:39+00:00): House removed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157955520
VLD549 (2024-09-23 17:06:33+00:00): Hi, I was asked to check the name change from Aarschotsestraat to Aarschotsetraat. I think there is a typo? 

Thank you for letting me know.
H4N5-antw (2024-09-23 19:51:05+00:00): Waarde, 
15 sep'24 prentje 360 graden toont Aarschotsebaan en Assentstraat : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=445651898533978&focus=photo , ook elders A'baan , zie aan oost eind geen straatnaam bordje A'baan https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=992430269338413&focus=photo
Helpt dit? 
Met vriendelijke groet, 
Hans
VLD549 (2024-10-04 12:36:01+00:00): Hi, this doesn't help no. I am only referring to the typo in 'traat' and 'straat'. I'll make the edit as I'm sure it's a spelling issue.

No worries, thank you anyway.
VLD549 (2024-10-04 12:39:41+00:00): Sorry, I can't edit. Could you just add the 's' in Aarschotsetraat? Thank you!
bxl-forever (2024-10-10 14:55:54+00:00): Sure, Aarschotsetraat is definitely a typo but, as H4N5-antw explained in his reply, Mapillary pics show that the real name of this small path is Aarschotsebaan.

We edited the name according to what the street signs say.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384662326
VLD549 (2024-11-10 14:03:44+00:00): Ok, thanks.
eggie (2024-08-07 09:46:56+00:00): Water en landuse is best moeilijk. Dit gaat niet werken zo.
Je edits.
Nu ligt er water op water. Dat geeft foutmeldingen.
Ik pas even wat aan
Gr eggie
aseidel (2024-08-13 13:06:45+00:00): Hallo geozeisig,
ich habe gerade gesehen, dass Du den Namen des Flusses Ilmenau entfernt hast. Soll das so sein oder war das ein Versehen? Der Fluss heißt hier tatsächlich Ilmenau auf den von Dir bearbeiteten Abschnitten.
Herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
geozeisig (2024-08-14 10:08:03+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe den Namen nur von der Wasserfläche (natural=water) gelöscht. Der Name sollte an der Mittellinie (waterway=river) stehen. Ich habe es in jedem einzelnen Fall kontrolliert, ob das so ist. Stünde der Name an der Wasserfläche, würde er in waagerechter Form in der Landschaft stehen.
Gruß Dieter
aseidel (2024-08-14 11:42:57+00:00): Ah, tut mir leid! Das war mir nicht aufgefallen. Ich bin nur zufällig über den Änderungssatz gestolpert  - danke für die Klarstellung!
Herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
eggie (2024-08-07 10:20:55+00:00): Vaak zijn paden zoals het Tulomeenpad niet alleen voetpaden, maar ook geschikt om te fietsen. In dat geval highway=path gebruiken.
De voorgaande mapper had het ingeschat als highway=path Dat is een ervaren mapper. Jij maakt overal footway van. Klopt dat wel?
Gr eggie