piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Patchi (2024-06-07 05:36:52+00:00): Hello HaPe-CZ,

I don't quite understand why you change the platform ways from the train stations Saint-André-les-Alpes (https://osm.org/way/395252564) and Entrevaux (https://osm.org/way/396734929) into a multipolygon.
First of all the platform areas are used into the train relation and therefore wo do have now some inconsistencies. The former platform areas with the role platform are no platforms anymore (just a outer way from a multipolygon).
And secondly I doubt, that the shelters which are used as inner ways for the new created multipolygons are not onto the platform. What is the problem to have a shelter onto a train platform area? In my humble opinion it is not necessary to create a multipolygon, there a several objects onto train platforms and a shelter is one possibility. In this case the shelter is still a part of the platform. With your change to multipolygons it suggests that these shelters are not a part of the platforms.

Best regards,

Patchi.
HaPe-CZ (2024-06-09 19:01:59+00:00): The sessions were transferred from the contour to the platform area.
If the shelter and platform is not designed as a multipolygon, the shelter is not displayed.
Patchi (2024-06-09 20:21:46+00:00): Hello HaPe-CZ,

Thank you for your answer. As you may read on the OSM wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer, tagging for a renderer is not a good practise. 
So the question is not if the 2 elements are displayed (through an renderer such Mapnik) or not but if it makes sense to put a shelter as inner way from a platform multipolygon. As I already wrote this makes no sense to my humble opinion, as the shelter is onto the platform (as other 'objects' as bin, bench which are also part of the public transport platform). The multipolygon suggests that the shelter is not a part of the platform.
Moreover the platform way still belongs to several train route relations with the role platform, but as the platform way itself (which is an outer way from your multipolygon) must be left untagged (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon) this cause inconsistencies into these train relations. Putting platform tags back onto the platform way is not the correct solution as long as this way is an outer member of a multipolygon (the outer way must be left untagged). To me the only correct solution is to put it back as it was before und delete the multipolygon.

Best regards,

Patchi.
HaPe-CZ (2024-06-10 08:24:38+00:00): Hi, yes, I know. But it's the eternal contradiction of what takes precedence. Whether visibility of objects (that actually exist) on the map for general users (not editors) or whether to accept the imperfection of rendering. Which is right and which is better? Human or artificial intelligence?
Patchi (2024-06-12 19:22:02+00:00): Hello HaPe-CZ,

the problem that you raise is related to a renderer. Instead of resolving this problem by changing the renderer you use for your purpose, you are skewing the data by removing a part of the train platform where the transport shelter is (the shelter in this case is still onto the platform). This results among other things to new visibility problems on other renderers. Take the change you made in Saint-André-les-Alpes with the official transport layer of OpenStreetMap https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152330529#map=19/43.96985/6.50669&layers=T. Now it seems there are 2 platforms and a building in the middle. What should your general user think in this case?
What I also do not understand, shelters on platforms are displayed with the most standard layer Mapnik with a POI.

Best regards,

Patchi
Merlin13245 (2024-06-06 18:31:19+00:00): Hi lost of light! Welcome to Open Street Maps.

These changes look great. Thanks for contributing to the map. 
For future reference: Changesets should be localized as much as possible to the area where changes are being made. It looks like this Changeset should have been created as two instead of one. One with the changes to the North-East of Vidor, and one with the changes in Norfolk.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• Combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province).
• Keep changes within the same country.
• Upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area.

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
ftrebien (2025-03-10 16:04:27+00:00): A 20 de Março entre a 19 de Fevereiro e a Martim Félix Berta em placa indicando que é 30 km/h.
os-emmer (2024-09-11 15:31:36+00:00): Engish version below.
Translated with deepl.com

Hola Redondelán,
Creo que aquí has utilizado una etiqueta obsoleta:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11960779631
emergency=ses_station ya no debe utilizarse. ¿Sabes si el lugar corresponde a emergency=disaster_response?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=disaster_response

Hi Redondelán,
I think you used a deprecated tag here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11960779631
emergency=ses_station should no longer be used. Do you know if the place fits emergency=disaster_response?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=disaster_response
philippec (2024-06-06 14:28:07+00:00): Gelieve de AED Basic Fit Bruul terug op zijn plaats te mappen.
philippec (2024-06-17 17:14:31+00:00): Ik heb het in uw plaats gedaan.
Gonéo (2024-06-06 14:17:12+00:00): Suite à la demande de relecture : attention au croisement de la piste et de la rue bd des Tchécoslovaques (au carrefour avec la Grande rue de la Guillotière). Il y avait d'ailleurs des avertissements dans ID. Si j'ai bien compris les travaux en cours la piste reste à l'Ouest et la rue à l'Est mais ne se croisent pas.
Il faudra prolonger aussi la VL2 au sud de ce carrefour.

Le bd Tchécoslovaques devient voie de bus uniquement au niveau du 21?? Je l'ai remise en voie de circulation pour l'instant.
Hubert Bécart (2024-06-06 14:54:37+00:00): Le raccordement Tchécoslovaques et GR de la Guillotière n'est pas encore totalement clair, en effet. Il faudrait repasser voir bientôt.

En effet, entre Gambetta et Brunard, il n'y a plus qu'une voie bus en sens nord-sud sur Tchécoslovaques (en surface).
Entre Brunard et Guillotière, ça devient une voie normale, pour permettre aux riverains de Brunard de rejoindre la Grande Rue de la Guillotière.
Gonéo (2024-06-06 15:18:16+00:00): C'est corrigé … en attendant la suite des aménagements.
silversurfer83 (2024-06-07 00:26:27+00:00): Gude :)

Bei Ladestationen gilt, was auch bei Tankstellen gilt: Entweder es ist eine charging_station (das kann auch eine Ansammlung von 12 Superchargern sein) ODER du hast EINEN charge_point (was dann einer dieser Supercharger wäre in meinem Beispiel). Charging_station verhält sich zu charge_point wie Tankstelle zu Zapfsäule.
Vergleiche: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152331704
akino_germany (2024-06-07 09:40:56+00:00): Aus dem Wiki: "Ist nur ein Ladepunkt vorhanden, kann man_made=charge_point zum amenity=charging_station hinzugefügt werden." Das ist hier der Fall.
silversurfer83 (2024-06-07 10:23:51+00:00): Ah. Verstehe. Danke, dass du mich auf diese Formulierung hingewiesen hast.
Dann habe entweder ich etwas in den Diskussionen falsch verstanden oder die Personen, die den Artikel geschrieben haben, ungenau formuliert.
Ich werde da nochmal nachlesen und -fragen.

Happy mapping
Silversurfer83
rskedgell (2024-07-25 06:05:47+00:00): Mini-roundabouts (traversable centre, road marking per TSRGD diagram 1003.4) are tagged as nodes rather than as circular ways as routing software needs to be able to differentiate between them. I realise that it is tempting to re-map them so that they look better on the map, but it is incorrect and unhelpful to data consumers. Reverted.
eggie (2024-06-06 15:25:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback... Zou je kunnen uitleggen wat je bedoelt met je commentaar 'x'?
Je hebt een adresnode verwijderd en een naam op een gebouw gezet. 
Bestaat Oldenzaalsestraat 2 niet meer?
Wat bedoel je met Roolman?
Bedrijven taggen we op de adresnodes. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-06-06 15:32:47+00:00): Tip Agrarische bedrijven kun je op een valk taggen met de grootte van het erf
met landuse=farmyard en dan zet je daar de naam op.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmyard

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-06-06 15:28:53+00:00): Dag Rik..  Wat bedoel je met x in je commentaar bij je upload.
Je hebt een adresnode Grotestraat 32 verwijderd. Bestaat dat adres niet meer.
Tip Het beste kun  je bedrijven op de adresnode bijtaggen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-06-06 15:36:47+00:00): Het adres heb ik hersteld..  Probeer alleen de bedrijfsinfo te verwijderen van de adresnode.
Winkelnfo verplaatst naar adresnode

MVG
eggie
Strubbl (2024-06-06 17:54:47+00:00): Danke fürs Bearbeiten meiner Hinweise! Die hatte ich schon gar nicht mehr auf dem Schirm.
UKausch (2024-06-14 15:55:49+00:00): @Strubbl:   Gerne :-)
felipeeugenio (2024-06-12 00:17:59+00:00): Hola. Por favor cuidado con los warning que le arroja el editor al grabar. Dejó desplazada algunas de las aceras en el centro y pegadas a calles con las que no limita.

por otra parte, algunas de las veredas que agregó están dibujadas como parte de la calle. Cuando están pegadas son un atributo del camino (sidewalk=right/left/both)
Una duda. en la calle centenario, al dar la curva para cruzar la linea del tren: hicieron veredas ahi hace poco? yo pasé por ahi registrando las fotos en mapillary y no había vereda en los dos lados.


por favor tener cuidado. Estamos para ayudarla por cualquier duda
Filip009 (2024-06-07 20:17:04+00:00): Zdravím, nachádza sa tam teraz to parkovisko, alebo nie? Najprv ste ho pridal, teraz ste ho vymazal.
user_21612800 (2024-06-08 04:37:59+00:00): Neviem, či bolo dobré vyhodiť jeden autoservis, lebo v podstate ide síce o jedného, ale zvlášť je Suzuki a to, čo ste vyhodili je Honda. Váhal som, či to dať ako autoservis, pretože je to predajca spolu so servisom. Tú budovu, čo ste nechal, je iba Suzuki. Tá druhá je predajca spolu so servisom pre Hondu. Druhá vec. Celý objekt je dobudovaný. Pôvodne som nevedel a dal som celú plochu ako parkovisko. Potom som pozrel, ako to má Peugeot rovno oproti a ten to má spravené ako parkovaciu uličku, čo je teraz. Takto je to asi lepšie, ale chcelo by to nové mapovanie, lebo tam nie je vybratá zem. Je to dobudované s parkovaním zvlášť pre Suzuki a zvlášť pre Hondu. Tak som Vám tam dal, aby ste to skontrolovali. Podľa mňa som to mal teraz dobre, zvlášť budova Suzuki a zvlášť budova Hondy. A je to predajca, samozrejme každý má svoj servis. Upravil som to zase podľa vzoru Peugeot rovno oproti. Ten máte iba ako servis. Neviem teda
Filip009 (2024-06-08 05:17:18+00:00): Jedného som vyhodil len na tomto mieste https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11963451421. Na tom mieste boli len 2 budovy s rovnakými servismi na oboch budovách.

Inak pre niektoré veci sa používa bod, pre niektoré plocha. Napríklad pre parkovisko https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=parking sa môže použiť bod aj plocha. Preto bola tá plocha, čo ste nakreslil dobre. Peugeot to má síce spravené ako parkovaciu uličku, ale má tam bod toho parkoviska https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/663836753.

Pre predajcu áut odporúčam vytvoriť bod https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=car a pre firmu, čo to opravuje autá bod na mieste, kde sa opravovňa nachádza, pokiaľ ju poskytuje niekto iný, ako ten predajca.

Taktiež by som vás chcel poprosiť, že keď na jednom mieste robíte viac úprav nemusíte to nahrávať po jednom, stačí keď to nahráte v jednej sade zmien.
user_21612800 (2024-06-08 05:37:37+00:00): Filip, ok. Ten autoservis BDM som dal zvlášť dva autoservisy, ale preto, že osm mapy to majú mapované ako zvlášť budovy. Lenže to je jeden majiteľ. Ja by som opravil mapovanie a spojil budovy, je to jeden majiteľ. Tam mal totiž pôvodný majiteľ Auto Zobor spravenú dielňu, servis.
Druhá vec. Hlohovecká 3. Jeden predajca Autozobor a dve zvlášť budovy pre Suzuki a Hondu. Robil som to podľa Peugeot, lebo tam je to tiež prioritne predajca, ale osm tam má servis. Majú tam fresh mapovanie terénu, čiže parkovacia ulička je dobré, je tam zakreslená celá parkovacia betónová plocha ako terénu. Tak som to spravil dopredu ako to má Peugeot.
Totiž nový predajca AutoZobor pre Suzuki a Hondu už funguje vyše roka. Osm mapy na tomto mieste majú zlé mapovanie terénu. Treba urobiť nové. Areál je dokončený už dlhšie. Ostatné teda nechávam na Vás. Hej, tú plochu som spravil možno dobre, ale do budúcnosti asi bude lepšie tam dať parkovaciu uličku. Treba spraviť nové mapovanie, plocha bude automaticky. Jediný Here maps to má, ale tiež nedokončené.
Ok. Urobte tento areál, ako chcete. Len odporúčam auto s guľou na streche 😁 na toto miesto. Matúš
Filip009 (2024-06-08 05:56:09+00:00): Nezáleží na tom, že je tam jeden majiteľ. Má to katastrálne zamerané ako 2 budovy s rôznymi súpisnými číslami. Ako som vám písal vyššie, niektoré veci sa dajú mapovať ako bod aj plocha, takže budova nemusí byť určená ako obchod, stačí, keď je nad ňou bod.

Tak potom aj Peugeot sa môže opraviť na predajcu áut.

OSM mapy vylepšujú ľudia ako ste vy aj ja. Ten kto pozná aktuálne lokálne pomery. Preto kľudne do mapy pridajte to, čo sa tam nachádza. Pokiaľ sa mi ale niečo nezdá, tak sa vás na to opýtam, tak ako teraz. Čiže kľudne pridajte parkoviská, prerobte tých predajcov na bod nad budovou, môžete pridať prípadne aj ich otváracie hodiny...
user_21612800 (2024-06-08 07:05:52+00:00): Filip, Hlohovecká 3 NItra, AutoZobor už nechám tak. Ak sa Vám s tým chce hrať, tu je reál 3D od Googlu, ako to vyzerá. https://www.google.com/maps/@48.3224376,18.0374097,19z?entry=ttu

https://www.google.com/maps/@48.3226512,18.0373617,3a,75y,223.85h,88.76t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sWajHBHH86aQ0FHA785EB0A!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DWajHBHH86aQ0FHA785EB0A%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D223.85009795415397%26pitch%3D1.2360125781054023%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu

https://www.google.com/maps/@48.3223795,18.0362424,3a,75y,76.81h,83.32t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sXCGnkXXU-ndDzTWn_LN6fA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DXCGnkXXU-ndDzTWn_LN6fA%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D76.81059173265399%26pitch%3D6.676009377239367%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu

Majte sa. M
eggie (2024-06-06 15:58:19+00:00): Dag Pieter,
Dat paard en de fiets hoef je niet te taggen. Dat is default.

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2024-06-07 18:09:22+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152388052
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-07 18:10:06+00:00): Please don't add fictional map elements. Thank you!
NeisBot (2024-06-07 18:09:33+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152388064
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-07 18:10:10+00:00): Please don't add fictional map elements. Thank you!
NeisBot (2024-06-07 18:09:43+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152388070
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-07 18:10:15+00:00): Please don't add fictional map elements. Thank you!
GeoBoris (2024-06-07 14:58:19+00:00): Le nom de marque correct est "MG Motor" et non "Mg Motor".
eggie (2024-06-06 15:52:59+00:00): Dag Pieter. bicycle=no heb ik verwijderd. Dat is default.
Het pad heb ik losgemaakt van het bos.
Plakken kun je voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken tijdens intekenen.

MVG
eggie
Pieter Hilkemeijer (2024-06-06 16:04:20+00:00): dank voor de feedback
NicaTopo (2024-09-17 23:51:14+00:00): Hi ChocLover,
Some of your OSM building shapes are far bigger (3x-5x) bigger than the satellite imagery. I'm going to delete them.
Please narrow down your shapes to match the aerial imagery eactly.

Thank you
Bienson (2024-06-07 01:23:54+00:00): highway=bus_stop wieder vom Bushalteplatz entfernt (kein Bushaltestellen-Wartebereich):

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3450817995

Außerdem bitte Edits nach Orten aufsplitten.
OPerivar (2024-07-26 17:59:45+00:00): Welche Quellen hast du für diese Änderung genutzt?
eggie (2024-06-06 15:39:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  foot=private zou betekenen dat je met alle vervoermiddelen tot de voordeur mag komen behalve voor de postbode? 
Wellicht access=permissive in het algemeen.
Dan routeert het ook nog voor bezorgdiensten. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-06-06 15:56:03+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast. Mocht er een afgesloten hek staan en een art 461 wvs bordje  dan kun je wel access=private taggen. Up to you.
Groet
eggie
gurglypipe (2024-06-07 12:09:38+00:00): Where did this data come from? It looks like it’s been badly copied and pasted into OSM. The new addr:housename= and website= for a couple of these pharmacies contain a full address and something which is not an URL.

addr:unit= should be used instead of addr:housenumber= to specify commercial property unit numbers.

Please also split large changesets so they don’t span multiple countries, as that makes them hard for local mappers to review. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
eggie (2024-06-06 15:41:54+00:00): Dag Thijs. Dit lijkt me toch echt niet correct. foot=private?
wellicht access=private in het algemeen?
Wel fietsen, maar niet wandelen?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-06-06 15:43:14+00:00): foot=private heb ik verwijderd
access=private is voldoende
eggie (2024-06-06 15:44:18+00:00): Dag Thijs...   Welk bord staat hier vooraan?
Hoe kom je aan acess=private?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-06-06 15:48:37+00:00): Het lijkt me gewoon openbare weg.
Ik heb access=private verwijderd.
Mag de postbode hier niet komen of bv DHL? 
Laat even weten welk bord hier vooraan staat. 

MVG
eggie
ezio_m (2024-06-07 17:16:15+00:00): potresti essere più dettagliato nella descrizione delle tue modifiche?
penso che tu abbia eliminato dei segmenti della rotatoria ma così facendo adesso le relazioni dei bus sono errate
martien-176 (2024-06-06 18:48:28+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. 

Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline. 

Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152336861
martien-176 (2024-06-06 18:42:10+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. 

Well mapped but please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing ‘q’ on your keyboard. 

Also keep in mind that the majority of the buildings have some sort of a rectangular shape. It sometimes seem that they do not, but that is due to imagery distortion, overhanging trees or shadows from nearby features obscuring the building shape.

Please check this video on improving your buildings mapping:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152337216
NeisBot (2024-06-07 18:17:10+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152388361
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-07 18:17:26+00:00): Please don't add fictional map elements. Thank you!
Accipiglio (2024-06-07 18:22:39+00:00): Real elements. If you need a picture I send you.
Accipiglio (2024-06-08 13:44:00+00:00): Shore is present around the turtles lake
Accipiglio (2024-06-11 21:23:21+00:00): I do not know why you reported that. I don't know how to use this tool, maybe its your generation, not mine. Anyhow I tried to give my contibution.
I don't know wht's the pokemon or the fake you are wondering.
Anyhow this newspapers articles will maybe help you and the Wiki page will also help you about native turtles in Italy. Mention or not this shore, as you like, children will come there to see turtles in any case.

https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emys_orbicularis

https://www.romatoday.it/animali/tartarughe-aliene-il-parco-degli-acquedotti-e-rischio-invasione.html

Have a nice day and...
If you want, add proper tags. Otherwise, live peacefully
Max-Kritic (2024-06-07 06:15:21+00:00): Thélus n'est pas là !
Taksine (2024-08-25 09:45:25+00:00): 这里已经建成了，请勿根据过时的卫星图再画上去
Taksine (2024-09-07 14:08:03+00:00): What you are seeing is an outdated satellite image. The area under construction that you drew has already been completed a long time ago. It is a commercial building. Please don't draw it like this.
mavl (2024-06-06 16:51:29+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок создаёт несколько проблем.  
  
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=152337937  
  
1. Пакет правок удаляет три здания и заменяет их на одно здание. Как видно на спутниковом снимке (например, esri), эти три здания действительно есть. Другие участники добавили эти здания не просто так. Удаление их и замена на одно здание - это ухудшение точности.  
  
2. При движении на север проезд после тоннеля в здании поворачивает налево. Это не соответствует действительности. Дорога идёт прямо. Раньше было обозначено правильно. Я видел этот проезд. Можете мне поверить.  
  
3. На здание добавлен тег layer=-1. Это тоже не соответствует действительности. Это обычно здание, которое располагается на уровне земли. Оно не вкопано в землю.  
  
4. Здесь вы пишете, что вам не нравится, как указан адрес.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152302346  
  
У этих трёх зданий могут быть разные адреса. Но если вы уверены, что у всех трёх зданий адрес один, то просто обозначьте его без удаления данных.  
  
Этот пакет правок отменён.
Syl (2024-06-14 13:16:50+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai corrigé le nom, LDLC s'écrit en majuscule.
NeisBot (2024-06-07 18:17:22+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152388370
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-07 18:17:33+00:00): Please don't add fictional map elements. Thank you!
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-08 07:21:42+00:00): As you mentioned, yes, please send us photos. Especially for the location where you created a leisure=park in a parking space. 

The satellite images used show nothing of the kind.
Accipiglio (2024-06-08 13:40:46+00:00): Its not a parking, the problem is people park there.
In fact it’s made of ground and not asphalt, moreover the local Municipality considers it as ‘green’.
Don’t be toxic bro
ivanbranco (2024-06-08 18:00:55+00:00): @Accipiglio per conoscere il significato di un tag consulta la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:leisure%3Dpark
"Un parco è un'area aperta usata per scopi ricreativi", questo non é chiaramente il caso

inoltre cosa significa "the local Municipality considers it as 'green'"?
Accipiglio (2024-06-08 20:27:52+00:00): È una zona allocata presso gli uffici comunali come verde, infatti non è asfaltata e c’è un cordolo attorno. Poi, visto che la gente è incivile, ci parcheggia e ha trasformato l’erba in terriccio.
Allocatela come vi pare, non pensavo di creare tanto casino, ma non è un parcheggio e teoricamente è ‘verde pubblico’ come cubatura.