piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-11-22 06:47:12+00:00): Xin chào Bùi Việt Thắng, chào mừng đến với dự án OSM và cảm ơn vì đã đóng góp!

Để hợp tác dễ dàng hơn và giúp mọi người hiểu rõ về các chỉnh sửa của bạn, tốt nhất là thêm một mô tả ngắn gọn về những thay đổi mà bạn đã thực hiện. Các bình luận rõ ràng sẽ giúp cộng đồng theo dõi công việc của bạn và cung cấp phản hồi tốt hơn. Bạn có thể tìm thấy các mẹo về cách viết bình luận tốt tại đây[1].
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi Bùi Việt Thắng, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-11-22 06:47:15+00:00): Đây là một bình luận mẫu dựa trên chỉnh sửa bản đồ của bạn: "Thêm quán cà phê với chi tiết tòa nhà và tên"
(Auto-translation)
---
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added cafe with building and name details"
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-02 10:29:28+00:00): Hello!

You used
surface=niet-bestraat2
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1452793500/history

Have you maybe meant
surface=unpaved
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
söm4324 (2025-12-02 13:46:52+00:00): Hallo radteil,
hab grad bei dem Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26705458 building und building:levels angepasst bzw. entfernt. Da scheinen die Angaben durcheinander gekommen zu sein. Falls du die Etagenanzahl noch weißt, trag sie gerne ein.

Allerdings irritiert mich auch das name=picnic. Ist das tatsächlich der Name des Gebäudes oder auch nur ein Vertipper (von picnic_table)?
radteil (2026-02-06 05:42:14+00:00): Hallo söm4324, die Lagerhalle wird derzeit von der Firma picnic genutzt.  buildings:level hatte ich nicht bearbeitet.
söm4324 (2026-02-06 07:29:37+00:00): Moin radteil, ah, danke für die Aufklärung beim Namen. Das building:level hattest allerdings doch du in Version 3 hinzugefügt. :) Ich geh nun aber davon aus, dass das ein Vertipper war und wer als nächstes an dem Lagerhaus vorbeikommt, kann ja die Info ergänzen.
radteil (2026-02-10 18:25:36+00:00): Du hast Recht. Hier war mir ":level" in den Tag gerutscht. Du hast es bereits korrigiert. Vielen Dank, söm4324.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-02 10:29:31+00:00): Hello!

You used
surface=niet-bestraat2
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1452795283/history

Have you maybe meant
surface=unpaved
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
BCNorwich (2025-11-23 08:18:47+00:00): Hi,
I've removed the highway Way: NH 6 (1452795553) because it duplicated the existing highway Way: NH 6 (296008360). This probably caused some of the 93 crossing highway warnings given above.

Highway duplication could cause disruption of routing. Please take notice when folk comment on your mapping.

Regards Bernard.
ChrissW-R1 (2025-11-23 16:06:26+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/5065119
Warin61 (2026-02-09 00:37:33+00:00): Hi
The Conservation Area - Okuru-Waiatoto relation 19844694 has an issue with way Way: 1451048167 .. part of the way should not be in the relation?
❤️‍🔥 (2026-02-10 11:24:08+00:00): Hi Warin, thanks your recent comments. All the multipolygon issues should be fixed now. And cheers for fixing the massive broken forest. I'll check back once the validator has updated

also as an FYI, I'm working on improvements to iD (https://github.com/ideditor/schema-builder/pull/174 ) so there'll be a warning in the edito rif type=boundary isn't closed, or isn't geometrically valid. hopefully that will prevent these kinds of issues in the future
nitin PVT LTD (2025-11-22 10:14:01+00:00): Nh 6 ner Yavatmal Maharashtra India
gscholz (2025-12-02 08:44:38+00:00): Hi GumerGP,
even as you invested several changesets in this forest area(s), the result still is no valid relation, which is rendered properly on the maps. There are still a lot of self intersecting and overlapping lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-0.96879&lat=41.95736&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Can you please fix this?

An approach respecting that relations are not collections will help here.
Kind regards
Guido
SPalferro (2025-11-25 17:44:56+00:00): Buen día, antes que nada gracias por añadir información a OSM.

Tengo una consulta: ¿existe alguna fuente, mapa oficial o reglamentación que nombre como “Av. Virgen del Carmen” a todo el tramo de la RP46 entre Andalgalá y Saujil? Estuve revisando y solo encontré un mapa turístico de Andalgalá donde aparece ese nombre solo dentro de la ciudad.

El único otro lugar donde vi esa denominación fue en Google Maps, pero además de que no se puede usar información de allí por temas de copyright, también puede ser imprecisa, así que prefiero confirmarlo.

También puede pasar que en la zona se use ese nombre de manera informal, pero para aplicarlo a todo el tramo (especialmente considerando que atraviesa más de un municipio) normalmente se necesitaría alguna normativa provincial o una fuente oficial que lo respalde.

Por eso, si pudieras compartir la fuente, mapa o referencia en la que te basaste para agregar el nombre, te lo agradecería.

Saludos!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-24 06:20:58+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised Editing & import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176338499
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-24 06:20:59+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised Editing & import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176338499
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-11-25 23:51:51+00:00): Merhaba. Değişiklik açıklamanıza "Konumumuzda mağaza ismi çıkmıyor. Lütfen düzeltmemize yardımcı olunuz..." yazmışsınız. OpenStreetMap'te herhangi bir sorun yok. Mağazanızı 20 gün önce eklediğinizden bu yana mağazanız OpenStreetMap'te mevcut. OpenStreetMap'i kullanan sosyal medya platformlarında (örneğin Instagram, Facebook vb.) mağazanızı göremiyorsanız mağazanızı göremediğiniz platform ile iletişime geçmeniz gerekli. OpenStreetMap onlardan bağımsız bir coğrafi veri tabanı. İyi günler.
NeisBot (2025-11-22 09:09:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-22 09:09:41+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Digital marketing agency near Salt Lake"
tkardi (2025-11-27 14:45:06+00:00): Hey, shouldn't it be highway=tertiary like the rest of Näituse tn?
Darkpoint (2025-11-28 13:45:58+00:00): You are correct, fixed in changeset #175239407
Harel M (2025-11-23 08:16:05+00:00): Thanks for taking the time to improve OSM with images.
However, this image is not from this places and this kind of behavior is now what we expect from our community.
Please make sure not to upload this kind of wrong information.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-24 01:21:30+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18996
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-22 10:17:19+00:00): Why you think that "normal" junctions make trunk impossible? 

Please, look at highway=trunk in UK. And bad German tagging is irrelevant here, as it is not in Germany. 

Also, note that trunk retaggings in Poland must be first proposed and discussed at forums.
granitschädel (2025-11-22 10:40:00+00:00): It has nothing to do with bad german tagging, if there aren't special junctions, then where is the difference to other types of Highways?  In the english wiki to hw=trunk in the section to Poland there is the sentence: „They are also allowed to have at-grade intersections in exceptional cases, but since 2020 no such intersections exist“. If this sentence is wrong or outdated, it should be corrected. And didn't there was an agreement in the polish forum that „bezkolizyjność“ is necessary for a trunk? If not, I will reset the changeset.
Sorry for not asking in the polish forum first, I will looking for such things next time.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-22 10:45:51+00:00): There was huge trunk discussion, definition was changed. 
There is still huge ongoing discussion.

Thanks for reminder about English translations! It seems that these pages were not updated - can you post link if you have it handy?

(I still try to remember and find it, but if you still have link in browser...)

Change should be now reverted so no extra action needed with that
granitschädel (2025-11-25 18:20:09+00:00): Thank you for reverting it. The link to the Wiki is:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrunk
But I couldn't link the mentioned part directly, it is to found in the section „International equivalence“ at „Poland“
K12230LF (2025-11-22 10:54:22+00:00): Voici également un article sur les cliniques : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dclinic

Bonne cartographie !
jbcharron (2025-11-22 15:01:29+00:00): On s'est marché dessus, maintenant healthare=clinic est sur un noeud tout seul :)
user_23381312 (2025-11-22 15:54:31+00:00): que faut-il changer svp
user_23381312 (2025-11-22 16:03:24+00:00): N’hésitez pas corriger.
bartgron (2025-11-26 21:04:55+00:00): Usunięto:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172395
bartgron (2025-11-26 21:05:41+00:00): Usunięto:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172424
bartgron (2025-11-26 21:06:43+00:00): Obiekty usunięte
bartgron (2025-11-26 21:07:23+00:00): Obiekty usunięte
bartgron (2025-11-26 21:08:14+00:00): Usunięto:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172507
eggie (2025-11-22 10:46:00+00:00): Dag Tom,

Dat kan, maar meestal zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van eenrichtingsverkeer. Is dat hier ook zo. Dan voegen we toe oneway:bicycle=no en evt ook voor moped en mofa.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-11-22 10:51:23+00:00): Nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen... Bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-11-22 10:52:24+00:00): Aangepast met uitzondering voor fietsers
AndyB_66 (2025-11-27 09:56:04+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
kamilbogacki (2025-11-26 22:08:56+00:00): Dzięki za edycję!
Sylabowy Kot (2025-11-22 10:29:43+00:00): Mało to jednak dało xD
dypa (2025-12-05 08:03:02+00:00): При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra

Пожалуйста при внесении следующих правок используйте теги (Размеченный (нерегулируемый) пешеходный переход)
crossing=uncontrolled
crossing:markings=zebra

Заранее спасибо!
rhhs (2025-11-22 13:10:38+00:00): I changed the smoothness of the sett bit to intermediate (good is rare, usually only for pedestrian paths). Hasn't the part just north-east of the bridge been improved as well?
ivanatora (2025-11-22 14:03:40+00:00): Hello!

I was importing a user's comment from 2023-07-25 - "The road is repaired long time ago, perfect conditions in this segment". It is a bit dated, I agree :) 
If your observations are more recent, feel free to revert.
I try to put the date_check:smoothness tag whenever possible to know what is the observation date to be able to compare at later points.

Best,
ivan
rhhs (2025-11-22 14:32:28+00:00): Last time I was there was in 2020 and it was already good then (see Kartaview), so I'll set the bit beyond the Iskar bridge to good as well. I sometimes use roads-bg to choose destinations for survey; fortunately there aren't that many smoothness=bad roads in Bulgaria any more!
ivanatora (2025-11-22 14:46:49+00:00): I agree - slowly but surely the road infrastructure is getting better.
BCNorwich (2025-11-23 08:34:44+00:00): Hi, I've removed highways Way: 1452817916 and Way: 1452810764 as they duplicated the line of an existing highway.
somehundred (2025-11-22 17:32:16+00:00): Šie divi ceļi īstenībā nav 1. stāvā, bet 2. un 3. Tas ir norādīts ar 'level' birkām. Ceļi beidzas pie logiem. Līdz ar to pievienot ieeju nav pareizi lai gan apstiprinu, ka šajā pusē ir ieejas, taču tās vajag zīmēt atsevišķi.

Jebkurš var pats pārbaudīt klātienē trešā stāva ceļu, ieejot Apollo Kino un uzskāpjot pa kāpnēm, bet diemžēl lai izpētītu 2. stāva ceļu vajag iziet caur elektroniskajiem vārtiem, kur vajag noskenēt kino biļeti.
rusjanis (2025-11-23 06:21:07+00:00): Sveiks, zinu ka pirmajā stāvā ir ieeja, bet par cik NAV norādīts 'level' birka atzimēju ieeju.
rusjanis (2025-11-23 06:23:29+00:00): Šeit arī vajadzētu pielabot https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12570623483 
width=*
height=*
level=*
somehundred (2025-11-23 08:20:56+00:00): Es izlaboju, nomainot punktu uz logu un pievienoju 'level' birkas pie abiem logiem.
rusjanis (2025-11-23 08:33:22+00:00): 👍 ok.
Nu jā tāpēc ka nebija "level" birka man StreetComplete prasīja kāda te ieeja.
somehundred (2025-11-23 08:38:01+00:00): Ā, nu viss ir skaidrs!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-24 06:29:09+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised Editing & import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176338702
Marek Vašků (2025-11-22 19:20:19+00:00): I am new to this. When can i see the change applied or what should be my next steps?
aTarom (2025-11-27 10:28:16+00:00): Hello, if you are referring to when the changes are reflected on the standard OSM layer, it usually takes just a few minutes. You may need to refresh your browser cache, perhaps by pressing CTRL+F5.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
eggie (2025-11-22 10:54:16+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.

Bedanks voor je bijdrage.. 
Probeer svp op de bestaande adresnodes bij te taggen.

MVG
eggie
Cocohae (2025-11-22 11:17:50+00:00): hi eggie
sorry i dont know how to do that .
i can try to add the bakery again
eggie (2025-11-22 11:20:44+00:00): Hi..I did it for you . I think comaps is limited.

Greetz..
eggie
Cocohae (2025-11-22 11:29:17+00:00): ok thanks. will try to use OSM app next time then
Jordi MF (2025-11-22 10:47:00+00:00): Deixe el node damunt de la urbanització a efectes de facilitar la navegació a la zona on s'acumulen més cases. Però la partida de la Baiona Baixa inclou una àrea més gran que la zona habitada.
NeisBot (2025-11-22 11:06:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-22 11:06:41+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Heating and cooling service in Covington GA"
user_5359 (2025-11-22 13:40:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database.
Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes.
pitscheplatsch (2025-11-22 13:46:54+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174988669

Thanks, user_5359
TrickyFoxy (2025-11-22 13:13:46+00:00): 👋  Just in case, be careful about deleting POIs from MAPS.ME notes. Sometimes a comment asks users to move a POI or fix something else.

This doesn't apply to this case, but it's a caveat in case of automatic edits
pitscheplatsch (2025-11-22 13:19:53+00:00): Thanks for the hint. But this is not an automated edit. 😉
NeisBot (2025-11-22 12:49:37+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 16 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/1191052310 v6 | crossings=8
https://osm.org/way/1191052309 v7 | crossings=8

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13323899046 v1

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174984191
Piagno (2025-11-22 11:29:53+00:00): und auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5062470
NeisBot (2025-11-22 12:49:38+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/1191052309 v7 | crossings=8

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13323886113 v1

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174984343
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-14 01:21:06+00:00): have you followed https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct ?

Where this mass edit is discussed and documented?
kapazao (2025-12-14 09:42:48+00:00): Hi, I understand about the automated edits code of conduct, but I do not see the problem here when adding an approved tag from almost one year ago that does not damage any data but completes and prepares data for the scheme, also avoiding errors with validators.

Of course this was an automated edition, only adding the education scheme to the neccesary amenities as wiki is told, no more.

Spanish community is watching these changes and I haven't received any communication or no one has told me about a problem with these changes.

This was communicated with some of the main spanish group of editors and there was no problem.

If you think there is a problem with these changes and they would be reverted I would like to understand better how to proceed with changes like these then as I do not want conflicts or problem with data.

Regards
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-14 10:54:38+00:00): > This was communicated with some of the main spanish group of editors and there was no problem.

can you link where this discussion happened?
Hugoren Martinako (2025-12-14 18:09:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mateusz%20Konieczny please don't use the old, overused (and, in my opinion, obsolete) argument about automated edits to criticize a proposal that has already been approved (you yourself participated in it). 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Education_tag

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/why-is-it-ok-that-id-performs-undiscussed-semiautomatic-distributed-mass-edits/139011
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-14 23:45:01+00:00): > old, overused (and, in my opinion, obsolete) argument

this rules are still applying

> a proposal that has already been approved 

such proposal does not waive requirements for automated edits
kapazao (2025-12-15 09:21:40+00:00): Hi, this was commented in a private conversation in a weekly mapping party we make each week, but there was no record of it.

I understand that the rules about automatic editions are made to avoid problems with database and so other users understand these changes. This was made by a user with experience and this was well explained in the changeset and the wiki about education=* so I do not understand this as the only thing I do is fixing a problem fast and not letting hundred of users losing their time going 1 by 1 that is totally absurd.

Regards
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-15 10:58:40+00:00): If change was discussed and supported by local community then main issue is not present.

(though linking to discussion in changeset description or changeset tags or changeset discussion is a good idea for mass edits)
SomeoneElse (2025-12-14 00:21:24+00:00): Hello,
This looks very much like an automated edit.  Can you point to where it was discussed with the community?
Best Regards,
Andy
(note - this changeset was linked from https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/why-is-it-ok-that-id-performs-undiscussed-semiautomatic-distributed-mass-edits/139011/33 )
SomeoneElse (2025-12-14 00:21:44+00:00): Hola,
Esto parece una edición automatizada. ¿Podrías indicar dónde se discutió con la comunidad?
Atentamente,
Andy
(Nota: este conjunto de cambios se enlazó desde https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/why-is-it-ok-that-id-performs-undiscussed-semiautomatic-distributed-mass-edits/139011/33)
kapazao (2025-12-14 09:43:30+00:00): Hi, I understand about the automated edits code of conduct, but I do not see the problem here when adding an approved tag from almost one year ago that does not damage any data but completes and prepares data for the scheme, also avoiding errors with validators.

Of course this was an automated edition, only adding the education scheme to the neccesary amenities as wiki is told, no more.

Spanish community is watching these changes and I haven't received any communication or no one has told me about a problem with these changes.

This was communicated with some of the main spanish group of editors and there was no problem.

If you think there is a problem with these changes and they would be reverted I would like to understand better how to proceed with changes like these then as I do not want conflicts or problem with data.

Regards
SomeoneElse (2025-12-14 11:07:17+00:00): The https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process page contains the text "Also, a vote result is never permission for large-scale re-tagging of existing objects. See automated Edits code of conduct for more about this topic. " (and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Procedimiento_de_propuesta likewise "Además, nunca utilices el resultado de una votación como justificación para el reetiquetado a gran escala de objetos existentes. Véase el código de conducta de ediciones automatizadas para más detalles sobre este tema. ").
I don't think that a revert will solve the problem, since any iD edits will just force the tag back in, but you will now need to monitor and manage the 20k objects you have edited to check for problems.
SomeoneElse (2025-12-14 11:14:28+00:00): Problems are easy to find - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5371741/history is one.  The original relation was tagged as amenity=school but was a type=site relation, you added education=school and someone then removed amenity=school from that and added it to the outer way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29083822 .
The overpass query to find these problems is https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2hfT - change the area of that to look elsewhere.