piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
YomanNH (2025-12-11 06:37:33+00:00): driveways like yesterday
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
grzegorz75jan (2025-12-10 00:28:09+00:00): Podobnie jak w poprzedniej edycji 175734304 nie widzę podstaw do zmiany klasyfikacji dróg na unclassified.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175734858
Szymson (2025-12-10 18:25:04+00:00): Jotkę też puścili przez węzeł? Szukałem informacji na stronie ZKM Gdynia ale nie znalazłem, a też chciałem ją tam przenieść xd
stasiu512 (2025-12-10 18:32:10+00:00): tak - https://zkmgdynia.pl/komunikaty/zakonczenie-budowy-wezla-zryw-w-wejherowie-zmiany-w-obsludze-przystankow-310
stasiu512 (2025-12-10 18:35:01+00:00): Ale namieszałem i tak bo na Gdańskiej się nie zatrzymuje, zaraz poprawie:)
K12230LF (2025-12-10 12:14:35+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap,

Vous avez ajouté un noeud du type Attraction tout proche de https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9543778902

Vouliez-vous dire que ce cap est une attraction touristique ? 
Vous trouverez ci-après un lien listant les principaux tag possibles pour les élements touristiques : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:tourism

A noter que vous pouvez, si vous le souhaitez, trouver beaucoup de ressources ici : https://www.openstreetmap.fr/contribuer/ , notamment le forum pour échanger avec la communauté en cas de doutes.

Bonne cartographie !
JMGonk (2025-12-09 23:33:09+00:00): Should have included with my change comment: there is still a lot of work to be done on O-day'min Park and its connections, I just wanted to quickly get the shape and condition of it up to date.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-09 22:43:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8851450898
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457335800

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-09 22:53:08+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8851450898
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457335800

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
dknelson9876 (2025-12-11 03:50:02+00:00): HI Flap Slimy Outward, please note that according to local conventions documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions the directional prefixes that you added to many streets (the "South" in "South Freedom Boulevard") should be captured via the name:prefix=* and name:full=* tags, but not in name=* since it is not present on street signs.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-12-11 04:47:17+00:00): These roads in particular lacked any `name:prefix=*`, `name:suffix=*`, or `name:full=*` tags, and the already-existing `name=*` tags had no directional prefixes or suffixes whatsoever (AFAIK).
dknelson9876 (2025-12-11 05:06:52+00:00): Yes, that's correct. The prefix was missing from these streets. Then you added a prefix to some of these streets ("Freedom Boulevard" -> "North Freedom Boulevard", "Center Street" -> "West Center Street") in the name=* tag, when that complete name actually belongs in name:full=*
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-09 23:13:05+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13364194980

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
muralito (2025-12-10 15:12:42+00:00): Hola Fechasa. Gracias por los aportes. Ten en cuenta que los elementos como tal se mapean una sola vez, o sea un amenity=fuel por cada estacion de servicio. En el caso de este cambio le agregaste esas etiquetas al techo de una estacion, pero la estacion (su servicio/funcion) ya estaba mapeada en un nodo. Quizas este medio confuso como lo plantea el editor.

Saludos.
muralito (2025-12-10 15:13:37+00:00): Sin repeticiones quiero decir, no es que una vez y asi queden, sino que sin repetir los datos.
Frank Peng (2025-12-10 01:32:25+00:00): This changeset did not disconnect the node of the road from the administrative boundary as I thought it would. Instead, it moved the node back to its previous position along with the administrative boundary. The node of the road was actually disconnected from the administrative boundary in Changeset 175738531. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175738531
mikefalzon (2026-01-16 10:54:53+00:00): Roundabout is offset badly. Note you need to check the satellite imagery as it is often not aligned correctly to the map.
user_5359 (2025-12-10 10:43:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved two nodes more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
You also moved the two additionals nodes https://www.osm.org/node/13260591090 (Hydrant), https://www.osm.org/node/11141697761 (Handy Shop) more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position. If you need help, you are welcome!
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-10 14:14:03+00:00): The shop should be located at the office, usually a node unless outline is known.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175737646
Taya_S (2025-12-10 05:06:09+00:00): Reverted deletions. Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19144

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175742065
Sébastien Pi (2025-12-11 18:39:10+00:00): Bonjour Mathieu,

Vous avez utilisé un « bicycle:start_date » pas très standard. Vu la chronologie, vous semblez être le seul à l’utiliser : https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/bicycle%3Astart_date#overview

Vous pouvez le proposer si vous souhaitez : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Processus_de_proposition

Il est en général peu recommandé de créer des tags :
* doublons potentiels ?
* pas supportés par les consommateurs ;
* parfois flous et donc même pas compris par les cartographes comme ce n’est pas documenté.

Merci
Matthieu HUGOT (2025-12-11 22:21:50+00:00): Bonjour,

J'ai réédité en start_date.

Merci

Matthieu
Sébastien Pi (2025-12-12 08:51:45+00:00): Merci, c’est mieux.
urk (2026-06-13 08:18:05+00:00): Hi, am Beispiel
Naturdenkmal 1 Eiche (1142059953) 
fiel mir auf, dass du zuletzt einige als Naturdenkmal getaggten Bäume bearbeitet hast. Seit langer Zeit, wahrscheinlich seit dem ersten Eintrag, ist das Feld "name" mit einem Wert belegt, der eher eine redundante Erläuterung ist. Nach meinem Verständnis ist name 
1. dafür grundsätzlich der falsche Schlüssel, und 
2. auch, wenn man dafür description verwenden würde, erscheint mir der gesamte Wert "Naturdenkmal 1 Eiche" unnötig . "Naturdenkmal" ist bereits als denotation verschlüsselt, dass es 1 Baum ist ergibt aus natural=tree und Eiche ist der Schlüssel genus. 
Was hältst du davon, derart genutzte name Schlüssel bei Naturdenkmal-Bäumen zu löschen?
Gregory Peony (2025-12-10 02:27:42+00:00): I think all footprins here represent buildings, but some are slightly oversized.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom in so that you can accurately draw the footprint. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with `shift+(-/+)`, or JOSM with `ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag`.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
DressyPear4 (2025-12-10 22:33:34+00:00): Olá, muitas vias adicionadas não existem, na lista de camadas (lado direito) mude para Mapbox, está mais atualizada nessa região
Langlaeufer (2025-12-10 10:19:53+00:00): Hallo Christian,
willkommen bei OSM. schön dass du uns hilfst die Karte zu verbessern.
Kleine Anmerkung: parking_aisle ist für Nebenfahrgassen AUF Parkplätzen - nicht für die Hauptfahrrouten und auch nicht für Grundstückszufahrten.
private ist recht strickt und sollte nicht benutzt werden wenn dort Kunden- und Lieferantenverkehr ohne vorherige Anmeldung stattfindet.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175739492
Christian Budde (2025-12-10 10:42:02+00:00): Hallo Langlaeufer,

super, dass du schreibst. Ich bin da noch recht neu und habe wenig Ahnung. Gerne ändere ich das entsprechend. Dazu ein paar Fragen:

Was verwende ich denn für Lieferantenzufahrten am Besten? Was würde ich für Parkplatzzufahrten am besten verwenden, wenn der Parkplatz kein öffentlicher Parkplatz ist, sondern nur für Mitarbeiter freigegeben ist? Wie kann man Lagerhallen kennzeichnen? Ist das ein Fabrikgebäude oder eine Gewerbefläche?
Langlaeufer (2025-12-10 12:08:39+00:00): War ja schon alles ganz gut.
Bei einer Firma mit größere Zufahrt würde ich highway=service ohne ohne weiteres service tag verwenden. Bei kleineren rein privaten Zufahrten könnte man service=driveway nehmen (
Zufahrt Mitarbeiterparkplatz mit service=driveway und access=private. 
Lagerhaus ggf. warehouse

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=service
dknelson9876 (2025-12-11 03:43:52+00:00): Hi Kirk, can you explain your reasoning for why you downgraded all of these to driveways? To me these look like a mixture of some residential, some service, some driveway based on whether or not it has a name, and how many units each serves.
Kirk Ireson (2025-12-11 23:51:48+00:00): I live near here and are familiar with those pavements. Those which go into apartment and/or condo areas are all privately maintained (some are gated too), and thus fall under my definition of a driveway. The one at Holliday Water is unnamed and looks like driveway for access to their garage. I guess that one could be changed to "service" but I think we're splitting hairs here.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-12-13 04:47:59+00:00): 道路改名是有相关的政府公告吗？有的话其实是建议最好在source里面插入一下。

此外另外 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1122315976 里面这个恶作剧还是太逆天了，这种东西作为中国编辑者没法给你改回来，但就放这么个东西在这是纯属此地无银三百两谁都要来看一下的，可能不想去挖历史的也会去挖了——晓得不晓得OSM是可以查看各种编辑历史啊，从08年到现在所有的历史

可能不希望它出现在国际互联网上，但已经出现了的是改变不了的事实，反而容易被有心人大做文章，“中国试图将军事单位改名麦当劳进行战略欺骗”

注意一点
smeòrach (2025-12-14 20:40:29+00:00): Tha mi ag aonachadh ris an Changeset seo...tha mi airson do chur an dùil ged-tà, tha mi glè chinnteach gum feuch cuid eile car a chur air na h-atharrachaidhean seo. Rinn mi an aon rud air ainmean san Eilean o chionn bliadhna nà dhà, agus thuirt iad gu robh ainmean dà chànanach draghail air renderers, agus dh'atharraicheadh iad air ais ann am Beurla a-mhàin. Ma thig e gu sin, mholainn gun cuirear Gàidhlig a-mhàin air ainmean ann an Slèite (a h-uile càil taobh a-staigh relation 14546898) agus sgìre Chille Mhoire (taobh a-staigh relations 17970206 agus 17970666), far a bheil as àirde de Ghàidhlig san Eilean. Hint hint

Co-dhiù, tha mi an dòchas gun dall thu ort le edits air a' Ghàidhealtachd, tha fada cus sgìrean far eil an data lom gun detail, fiùs sa Bheurla gun tighinn air a' Ghàidhlig.
jSeke (2025-12-22 01:13:54+00:00): tapadh leibh airson ur comhairle, ma thachras sin cuiridh mi Tiriodh sa Ghàidhlig a-righist cuideachd.
mapbear66 (2026-01-29 04:23:31+00:00): Hi. I am that renderer wondering about "en - gd" in the name tag. I'd expect one or the other not both.

It should be what it's mostly known as.
mapbear66 (2026-01-29 10:17:30+00:00): I see that it is not just a few names you have changed, it's all over Skye. Please see this page on the OSM wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Scotland
and revert as soon as possible. I expect most of the names to be the english spelling, E.g I've looked up a few and like "Stein" have that on the entrance to the village as well as the pub being spelt The Stein Inn. 

Thanks.
jSeke (2026-01-29 12:29:13+00:00): Right well Skye is pretty bilingual but as per your orders I'll put the whole island back to its primary language (Gaelic in Slèite, Cille Mhoire and also Tiriodh afterwards and English in Snizort, Bracadale, Strath, Duirinish and Portree)
Taya_S (2025-12-10 05:04:11+00:00): Reverted deletions. Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19142

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175742031
Frans S (2025-12-28 12:08:51+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
We welcome you as a new mapper.
Your mappings are accurate.
Please do not collect adjacent buildings and tag them as 1 building.
Best regards
Taya_S (2025-12-10 05:03:39+00:00): Reverted deletions. Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19141

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175742020
Taya_S (2025-12-10 05:04:41+00:00): Reverted deletions. Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19143

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175742043
alexwohlbruck (2026-04-04 14:29:57+00:00): Morrocroft villiage isn't a neighborhood, it's just the shopping area on sharon road. I've tagged this area accordingly
ftrebien (2026-01-20 13:14:30+00:00): Please do not remove mapped elements that still exist or are still visible in satellite imagery. These elements should be retained in the data, possibly with lifecycle prefixes (osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix). In this case, both links still exist. The one that had a block barrier no longer has that barrier, so it was effectively reactivated. You should have removed only the barrier.
World_Winner (2026-01-22 09:46:33+00:00): Hi ftrebien,

Thank you for your valuable feedback and for providing ground truth based on your local knowledge. Treating the unused section as demolished was a misinterpretation of the situation. Thank you for reverting the changeset. Your reasoning, I clearly understand. We will keep this in mind for similar cases in the future.
dmjab13 (2025-12-10 14:54:17+00:00): you need to stop submitting changesets with a bounding box this large
Dquest (2025-12-12 20:09:39+00:00): I'm not sure how the bounding box is so large. I only updated the road and address for my cabin.
felipeeugenio (2025-12-10 11:54:57+00:00): Hola. Esta es la base de datos en producción. No es un lugar para pruebas. Las ediciones serán reversadas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175742376
user_5359 (2025-12-10 08:26:04+00:00): It clearly states ‘can’ and not ‘must’. 

Note that there must always be a four-digit year for the possible end date, so that the end date is always (!) clearly recognisable. Historical special regulations should be abandoned.
houtari (2025-12-17 15:21:46+00:00): Korjattu alueiden keskinäistä topologiaa. Tälle polulle https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/990506793 pitäisi vielä tehdä päivitys. Lienee nykyään jotain muuta kuin polku, eihän muuten tuonne pysäköintialueelle pääse esim. autolla? HUOM! Polku ei nykyisellään ole kytketty Koirisärkäntiehen vaan sen vieressä kulkevaan pyörätiehen, joten päivitys on tehtävä myös polun pohjoispäässä jotta reititykset toimivat oikein!
Glassman (2025-12-11 03:00:10+00:00): I changed the road back to unclassified. OSM uses British names for tags since it was started in England. Unclassified is  basically a rural residential road. Also, the county shows the name West Valeri Lane so I added it back. Let me know if this is wrong.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175742681
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-23 08:21:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856
hoserab (2026-02-02 19:48:59+00:00): Hi HostileSpark,

FYI I just deleted a bunch of `ref` tags from the rooms you added in this changeset (and others?). Not sure if it's something the Indoorhelper plugin is doing, just wanted to give you the heads up.

Eventually I think your indoor mapping should be consolidated with the shop tags that are already on the map; I had added the "room ref numbers" to `addr:unit=*` for many of them already.

Cheers
pwbriggs (2025-12-14 06:47:06+00:00): This is incorrect. Maybe consider preventing users from moving the location of a defibrillator more than a reasonable amount.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175908037
chnuessli (2025-12-14 12:15:01+00:00): Looks like data vandalism to me :(
pwbriggs (2025-12-15 05:45:13+00:00): Yes, I reverted it, see linked changeset. But https://osm.org/user/defikarte is a service account for https://defikarte.ch/, which could use some tighter data validation such as a maximum move distance.
RandomThighsEnjoyer (2025-12-17 09:36:55+00:00): Lies bitte die Nachricht die ich dir geschickt habe. Hier ist auf beiden Seiten der Straße(n) jeweils nur eine Baumreihe in der Realität und nicht zwei.
VLD0251 (2026-01-20 09:13:40+00:00): Thanks! the name tag is only for the actual brand name. if you don't know it, please leave the name blank and use cuisine=pizza instead. this helps keep the map accurate. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfast_food
rohieb (2026-01-11 05:29:53+00:00): Ich hatte in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24786910/history/16 explizit maxweightrating=3.5 gesetzt und nicht maxweight=3.5, weil in den Pressemeldungen der Stadt von "Beschränkung des zulässigen Gesamtgewichtes" die Rede war. Ist das vor Ort anders ausgeschildert?

Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:maxweightrating#Unterschiede_zu_maxweight=* für Beispiele.
felipeeugenio (2025-12-10 11:49:46+00:00): Hola. Buenos días.
Viendo las fotos del lugar  y acordándome de la vez que pasé por ahí: Entiendo que la definición de parque contiene áreas grises, pero este sector es en gran parte un terreno baldío. No hay ni siquiera un intento de equipar el sector con infraestructura propia de una plaza/parque.

Otra cosa es que familian lo usen como área verde. Este es el tipo de cosas que discutimos en el chat de la comunidad. Estás ahí?
La parte en que está la cancha, y lo que resta hacía el nororiente puede ser que sea parque. Quizás hay que partir el predio en 2.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175745372
Daemon Targaryen (2025-12-10 12:48:44+00:00): Hola, Conaf ayer hizo una plantación de árboles en el lugar. No he pasado por allí para verificar si plantaron en todo el paño o no, pero pusieron hasta un letrerito con el nombre y todo. Se supone que todo el paño, desde Avda. Central hasta Avda. Magallanes, es o está destinado a ser un parque. Tal vez se pueda dividir o quizás superponer el área que todavía no ha sido equipada? No lo sé. Solo quería agregar su estatus "oficial" de parque. Lo dejaré a tu criterio porque tú sabes más jajaja. ¡Saludos!
(link de Conaf https://x.com/conaf_valpa/status/1998464362885882215)
felipeeugenio (2025-12-12 14:15:58+00:00): ok, si se está mejorando puede ser que cambie el status. Dejémoslo así mientras.

saludos
0xb7767000 (2025-12-10 08:53:26+00:00): Wieder mal danke für's aufräumen meiner ganzen alten Hinweise.
eggie (2025-12-10 08:39:10+00:00): Dag Bente,

Op een G11 fietspad hoort geen motor_vehicle=no
Dat geeft problemen met mofa
 (yes uiteraard ook niet)
Ik heb het fietspad aangepast naar G11

MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-10 07:41:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/865878721

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Sanniu (2026-03-02 15:23:25+00:00): Hi, way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457406676 has no tags, can you add appropriate tags?
eggie (2025-12-10 08:15:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Yexnamjoing (2025-12-10 07:57:00+00:00): 十分抱歉，我又更改了编辑错误，你自己看看吧
真中あお (2025-12-10 10:30:37+00:00): 由于该医院实地招牌只有”宜兴市人民医院“七个字，而且实际上并没有其他运营中的院区，那么名称中不应该有”新院区“字样。所以你其实改之前的别人改过的写法，就已经是对的了。
如果当地人的确经常称这个医院为”宜兴市人民医院新院区“，那么可以加在loc_name或alt_name键下。
不过，如果将来一家医院分设了几个院区，而门口的招牌写法都一样，那么就可以在每个院区的名字里用括号加上些后缀，来起到消歧义的作业了。
真中あお (2025-12-10 10:36:35+00:00): 作业→作用
Yexnamjoing (2025-12-11 11:24:28+00:00): 这里确实是叫新院区。但是由于仍然是这个医院，所以挂牌都是使用的是一个名字。旧的院区在城中心那里的。
真中あお (2025-12-11 16:26:27+00:00): 我找到新闻说老院区已经在今年早些时候彻底关闭。
在老院区关闭之前，与新院区一同运行的时期，确实是将二者的name键分别填写为”宜兴市人民医院(老院区)“”宜兴市人民医院(新院区)"会比较好，但是现在已经不适合那样做了。
对事物不同于name键所载名称的其他称呼，可以填写在对应的地图元素的loc_name键或alt_name键下。我已经把“宜兴市人民医院新院区”填汝这个地图元素的loc_name了。
真中あお (2025-12-11 16:26:51+00:00): 填汝→填入
Yexnamjoing (2025-12-11 16:30:05+00:00): 好的。那就这样了。现在老院区改成了老年医院和养老院，我想有必要去纠正一下了。总之，非常干洗您的指正，麻烦你了。好人一生平安！
真中あお (2025-12-10 08:57:29+00:00): 感谢您及时响应大家的建议，但是哎呀，您的改正其实仍然不合适……
osm遵循”实地原则“，其中一部分就是名称应当填写实地的招牌上写的。这家医院实地的招牌上没有”市“字，因此名称中也不应填”市“。
另外，另一个变更集中，你对宜兴市人民医院的改正，也没有改对……按照osm的规则，名称中不应该有”新院区“字样。所以你今天改之前的别人改过的写法，就已经是对的了。
如果当地人的确经常称这个医院为”宜兴市人民医院新院区“，那么可以加在loc_name或alt_name键下。
上述说的问题，以及我之前在其他变更集中评论的问题，我都已经改正并上传了，您不用再操作。
另外，欢迎您通过QQ群以及下列网页中列出的其他联系方式，与更多绘制中国的编辑者交流：https://osmchina.org/pages/welcome/default/zh-Hans.html
Yexnamjoing (2025-12-11 12:26:34+00:00): 好的。谢谢。
不是我和你争论，但是确实是“宜兴市人民医院”。官网：https://health.yxph.com/home.aspx。
可能有一些误解。
真中あお (2025-12-11 16:07:04+00:00): 我这里说不加“市”字的，是指这笔编辑被更改的“宜兴骨科医院”。
而对于宜兴市人民医院，我认为合适的做法是在新院区的name键填”宜兴市人民医院“这七个字（带”市“字而不带”新院区“等额外字样），其过去的旧址则根据现状标为工地，将”宜兴市人民医院“从其name键中删去，而填写在在old_name键中。我也确实是这么改的。
eggie (2025-12-10 08:23:07+00:00): Dag JE   Het 'park' heb ik omgezet naar een voetgangersgebied met een grasveldje.

Dit is geen park in de zin van...

MVG
eggie
kamilbogacki (2025-12-10 15:53:42+00:00): Hej! Przydatna edycja, jednak zwrócę uwagę na to, że nie usunąłeś tagów construction z toru. Tak samo teren kolejowy nadal w budowie.
eggie (2025-12-10 08:30:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Is deze Engelse naam werkelijk de officiële naam van het veldje?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Roydon Olive (2025-12-10 12:00:44+00:00): I think these ways were already tagged correctly, so I undid this edit.
ivanbranco (2025-12-13 21:54:31+00:00): Ciao FraCast1983,

come mai hai rimosso le informazioni riguardanti email, telefono e sito web? Ho controllato il sito web ed esiste. Un errore?

Grazie e buon mapping :)
ivanbranco (2025-12-24 10:06:14+00:00): Ripristino i dati dopo mancata risposta
RunningWave (2026-03-29 11:54:40+00:00): @leefix is the highway=construction tag still correct here? Traffic routing currently avoids this segment.
leefix (2026-03-31 04:21:34+00:00): Have not been there since long. Know somebody, who bypassed (don't know, why, though). Checked guugle maps via tor browser: "they" think, it's still closed. Don:'t know why, too ;)
RunningWave (2026-03-31 05:50:47+00:00): Thanks :) I'm planning a bicycle route, I will report on the status afterwards...