piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2026-01-03 09:40:40+00:00): Hoi,
Feedback
Lijkt me oke..
Alleen aan het noordelijke stuk waar he fietspad aansluitingen verspringen heb ik toegevoegd bicycle:backward=use_sidepath
Het geldt maar voor een richting op. 

MVG
eggie
wouternieuwerth (2026-01-03 13:37:10+00:00): Top, bedankt voor de toevoegingen.
AndyB_66 (2026-01-21 12:45:34+00:00): Wydanie ZnRID nie oznacza rozpoczęcia budowy.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-06 04:23:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431395472

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-06 04:43:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431395472

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-06 04:53:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431395472

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-06 05:13:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431395472

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-06 05:33:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431395472

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-06 05:53:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431395472

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-06 06:23:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431395472

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-06 06:44:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431395472

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-06 07:04:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431395472

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Rainero (2026-03-29 13:20:46+00:00): Revert changeset/180583019
wegen nicht zulässiger Quelle (Bayernatlas).
goedegazelle (2026-01-03 11:48:19+00:00): De "leisure" staat al op het omringende gebied, dus dit is dubbelop.
YomanNH (2026-01-14 10:56:39+00:00): Hej, po co dodajesz barrier=fence do każdego landuse=residential? Sprawdziłem na szybko i nie ma wszędzie ogrodzeń dookoła obecnych granic tych landuse. Jak chcesz dodawać ogrodzenia, to dodawaj je tam, gdzie rzeczywiście są, a te obecne fikcyjne lepiej pousuwaj.
Kovoschiz (2026-01-03 17:45:11+00:00): Please upload your edits in the same area together. Don't update 1 object per changeset. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176728421
Marvk (2026-01-17 23:34:08+00:00): Hi, auch wenn es im ALKIS fast so aussieht es wären es eigene Gebäude: Die Teile, die du hier als building=roof gemappt hast, gehören meiner Meinung nach zusammen mit dem building=yes, an dem sie hängen, zu einem einzigen Gebäude. Ggf. gehören sogar die 10B und 10A zum selben Gebäude. 

Wenn man trotzdem überhängende Dächer mappen möchte, sollte stattdessen mit building:part=* innerhalb eines großen building=yes gearbeitet werden.

Siehe auch:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part

Beste Grüße
Marv
osmmapper222 (2026-01-18 19:57:32+00:00): Hallo Marv,

ich habe 10a, 10b und die Dächer mit building:part=yes getaggt und alles in einem neuen Gebäude-Polygon zusammengefasst:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=52.388811&lon=9.577063

Der Nachteil ist, dass man für building:part=* scheinbar keine Adressen erwartet (iD hat keine explizizen Eingabefelder dafür und die Hausnummern werden nicht gerendert).

Alternativ könnte man 10a und b wieder als eigene Gebäude behandeln und beiden jeweils ein Dach als building:part=yes zuordnen.
Marvk (2026-01-18 20:05:38+00:00): Die mir bekannten Lösungen sind, die Adressen an separate nodes zu taggen, oder, wenn die Haupteingang für eine Hausnummer bekannt ist, an den Eingang.
osmmapper222 (2026-01-18 20:29:12+00:00): Die Adressen sind nun in eigene Nodes ausgelagert.
Znaika (2026-02-24 12:29:34+00:00): Hi, bist du sicher mit flexible? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:bollard
Es ist echt selten in DE in der Wohngegend. Aus Metall? Meistens ist es entfernbar oder umklappbar. 
VG, Znaika
Reuce (2026-03-01 17:00:32+00:00): Die beiden Poller sind vom Typ bollard=flexible. Er ist also aus weichem Kunststoff, um Verletzungen zu verhindern.
kingkingHK (2026-01-03 11:21:18+00:00): It seems like there is only one clinic in this building, which should mean that a clinic node is unnecessary?
vectorial8192 (2026-01-03 16:47:27+00:00): I get what you are trying to say, but the address says "ground floor", which implies the first floor (or more).

From experience this is usually the public servant dentistry (I omit them), or some sort of other "minor" clinics which share the same building.
kingkingHK (2026-01-25 03:56:07+00:00): From my experience, not all floors are occupied, and there are often more floors than clinics (presumably offices?). I also doubt that there would be many "minor" clinics in such a rural remote location. As I said elsewhere, if you are not sure, maybe don't do anything and wait for someone to do a survey?
kingkingHK (2026-01-03 11:23:21+00:00): `open:conditional=` looks like it should be `opening_hours=` instead.
Kovoschiz (2026-01-03 17:42:32+00:00): @kingkingHK No, it's another attribute. `opening_hours=` is not fully standard for `access=` and `highway=` https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:open
Dimitar155 (2026-01-03 17:46:17+00:00): Честита Нова година!

Моля не премахвайте вече отбелязани сграда, за да добавите същата отново. По този начин се губи историята и е трудно да се проследи от къде е дошла евентуална грешка в бъдещето.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176791905
Anonymous36863 (2026-01-05 15:15:00+00:00):  ЧНГ
cuzi (2026-01-03 11:49:50+00:00): The "opening_hours" follows a specific format, I have corrected them. Apart from that it looks good. 
Unfortunately prep schools aren't supported by the standard renderer on OpenStreetMap.org, so it won't appear here on the map. But other apps that use data from OpenStreetMap can show it.
NeisBot (2026-01-04 07:08:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13428350632 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Math tutoring center in Fort Myers"

#MapWithoutSpam
cuzi (2026-01-04 07:33:06+00:00): You can ignore this, it's just an idiotic bot
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-04 07:44:27+00:00): Thank you, @cuzi, for the constructive feedback.

In this changeset, a description containing SEO-related spam was added. You can verify this by checking versions 1 and 2 of the added node. This addition triggered the automated check, which is designed to flag such content when it appears in descriptions. While the spam was later removed by another contributor, this does not change the fact that it was initially introduced in this changeset.

Please let me know if you have any further feedback or would like to discuss this in more detail.
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-04 07:50:01+00:00): Spam/ad has been removed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176786654

Thanks @user_5359
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-10 08:59:29+00:00): Not only that, the changeset has an explicit changeset-level `source` of Google Maps `source=https://maps.google.com/maps?cid=662671721719113559`, which is of course expressly prohibited on OSM as one of our community's most fundamental rules ("Don't copy other maps") and quite possibly even an unlawful copyright violation, such that the changeset most likely needs to be either reverted (deleting the node and all its tags), or even redacted (where it disappears completely). I've submitted it along with a large batch of others to DWG to make the final call on that.

@pitscheplatsch actually has another "idiot bot", running under NeisAgent, that goes around detecting and warning about this (much more effectively than even the most experienced human mappers, as evident from the comments on this changeset, given it was missed), since such changesets almost invariably need to be reverted posthaste. If I were to guess why it didn't comment here, it either wasn't running at the time, or it doesn't comment if NeisBot already has (which IMO, it should take priority over the same, as its typically grounds for a complete revert rather than just a fix).
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-15 06:31:28+00:00): Thanks @CAM-Gerlach_Revert !
NeisBot (2026-01-03 12:22:22+00:00): 🌍 Selamat datang ke OSM, adha090.
Terima kasih kerana menyumbang!

Untuk memudahkan kerjasama dan membantu orang lain memahami suntingan anda, adalah yang terbaik untuk menambahkan keterangan ringkas tentang perubahan yang anda buat. Komen yang jelas membantu komuniti mengikuti kerja anda dan memberikan maklum balas yang lebih baik. Anda boleh mencari tip-tip untuk menulis komen yang baik di sini[1].

✅ Ini adalah contoh komen berdasarkan suntingan peta anda: "Menghapuskan penetapan laluan, menambah lebuhraya tidak terkelaskan"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, adha090.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Removed path designations, added unclassified highways"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
eggie (2026-01-03 12:09:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Zou je wat duidelijke willen zijn wat je allemaal hebt gewijzigd. 
Waarom maak je van een bedrijvenpark een boerenerf?
Wat bedoel je met cutting=yes ?
Ik overweeg je edits terug te draaien.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176778334

Wanneer je edits uitvoert buiten Nederland graag je commentaar in die landstaal of Engels
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-01-03 12:33:01+00:00): Ik heb het boerenerf aangepast.
De landuse residential teruggezet en het bos weer verkleind.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-03 12:41:55+00:00): typo residential>industrial
Jos Buijs (2026-01-03 12:56:14+00:00): Sorry er was iets misgegaan
eggie (2026-01-03 12:58:36+00:00): No problem... Alle begin is moeilijk.

Mvg..
eggie
Patchanka (2026-07-05 15:03:19+00:00): bonjour
il y a une note (anonyme) qui indique que l'accès serait de nouveau possible...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5376809

Je ne connais pas les lieux mais tu as peut-être l'info ?
Sébastien Pi (2026-07-05 19:19:26+00:00): Salut,
Pas d'info et je suis absent en ce moment.
Laisse la note pour qu'un autre contributeur plus disponible y jette un œil.
Sinon, ça attendra mon retour.
osmviborg (2026-01-03 12:29:12+00:00): Godt nytår
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13428412999
Konkon153 (2026-01-03 12:17:46+00:00): [ und damit alle 4.629 aktuell vorhandenen Adressen in der Gemeinde Parchim vollständig angepasst ]
FajrAl (2026-05-19 14:49:35+00:00): gunakan railway=abandoned karena relnya sudah tidak ada, bukan railway=disused
redd (2026-01-03 12:34:46+00:00): Danke dir!!
joost schouppe (2026-01-05 16:19:27+00:00): Waarom twee keer hetzelfde voltage hier? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1462774053
redd (2026-01-03 15:35:34+00:00): Danke dir, das war schnell :)
5R-MFT (2026-01-03 15:58:41+00:00): https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-notes Wenn es draußen zu kalt ist.
NeisBot (2026-01-04 07:08:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/1855339901 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dentist in Roseville CA"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-17 16:40:23+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176786577
Thanks @user_5359
kpv8 (2026-01-03 20:02:18+00:00): Co ma na celu ten changeset?
NeisBot (2026-01-04 07:15:02+00:00): 🌍 Witaj w OSM, DioxPL.
Dziękujemy za Twoje wkład!

Aby ułatwić współpracę i pomóc innym zrozumieć Twoje edycje, najlepiej dodać krótki opis zmian, które wprowadziłeś. Jasne komentarze pomagają społeczności śledzić Twoją pracę i zapewniają lepszą informację zwrotną. Możesz znaleźć wskazówki dotyczące pisania dobrych komentarzy tutaj[1].

✅ Oto przykład komentarza na podstawie Twoich edycji mapy: "Dodano ścieżkę, zaktualizowano szczegóły terenów rolnych"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, DioxPL.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added path, updated farmland details"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
kpv8 (2026-01-03 20:02:55+00:00): Po co dajesz na sobie tyle landuse? Przecież tam już jest farmyard.
kpv8 (2026-01-03 19:56:53+00:00): Dlaczego dodajesz residential na pola uprawne?
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-06 07:04:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13428516001

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Syhmac (2026-01-06 16:30:43+00:00): Poprawione
Richard05 (2026-01-03 13:26:57+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power=station?uselang=en
NeisBot (2026-01-04 07:08:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11850167363 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "paper servis obchod"
---
Například více neutrální a faktická verze tvého textu by mohla být: "paper servis obchod"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-17 16:40:24+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177343423
yargil (2026-01-11 10:51:50+00:00): Bonjour,

Les bâtiments que tu as ajouté n'existe plus. Il on été détruit et remplacé par un parking il y a quelques mois.
L'image satellite et le cadastre ne sont pas à jour.
J'ai donc fait un revert sur ce changeset.

Ma source : je passe devant tout les jours.
alainmi11 (2026-01-11 13:18:17+00:00): Oh mince, désolé !
Je me suis fié à un signalement sur Osmose et en croyant bien faire j'ai ajouté ces bâtiments que je ne voyais pas dans les données OSM.
Merci pour la correction !
Superadlen (2026-01-10 09:18:23+00:00): merci
markkul (2026-01-03 14:01:18+00:00): The map of Espoo in https://kartat.espoo.fi/ims has good updated picture about the buildings and the streets around the warehouse, when zoomed in.
Andrea Musuruane (2026-01-08 08:09:43+00:00): Ciao. Bisogna ricordarsi che i numeri civici devo avere lo stesso nome della strada. Ciao, Andrea
Mannivu (2026-01-08 11:08:47+00:00): Giusto, hai ragione, una grave dimenticanza da parte mia, perdonami.
Mannivu (2026-01-08 17:36:17+00:00): Li ho sistemati in questa modifica
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176994493
bartgron (2026-01-04 15:59:30+00:00): Na jakiej podstawie została dodana ta nazwa? Nie ma jej w oficjalnych źródłach
bartgron (2026-01-07 17:09:41+00:00): Nazwa została usunięta:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176953272
Pozdrawiam
Peppersnap (2026-03-29 09:52:30+00:00): removed
mueschel (2026-01-04 09:24:07+00:00): Hi, 
'gbt' is not a socket type, but a standard defining many sockets. Please check the precise type - I guess it is "gb_dc".
Mannivu (2026-01-03 14:51:52+00:00): Questo nodo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13428598918 in realtà non va etichettato in questo modo, perché così facendo si indica che tutte le corsie hanno il dare precedenza, cosa non vera. Mi pare che al momento non ci siano metodi per indicare che il give_way è solo per una corsia, quindi, per il momento, tolgo questo tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176783020
Mannivu (2026-01-03 14:52:30+00:00): Ciao, per quanto riguarda https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13428598918/history/1 usando quel tag si dice al database a alle varie applicazioni che si basano su esso che lì c'è un "Dare precedenza" valido per tutte le corsie, cosa non vera perché è valido solo per chi svolta. Siccome al momento non c'è un modo per indicare questa differenza, tolgo il tag per evitare confusione.
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-06 16:56:56+00:00): Hi.

In this and some of your recent changesets, you’ve added a large number of features that appear to share very similar tagging. Could you please tell us more about the source of this data and how it was collected? Specifically, I’d like to understand whether this was a data import or derived from an external dataset.

If an external source was used, could you also confirm that its licence is compatible with OpenStreetMap’s ODbL requirements?

Best regards,
Pascal
user_5359 (2026-01-03 15:23:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:building:colour for a better description of the colour.
marc__marc (2026-02-15 09:12:33+00:00): Bonjour,
attention à l'importation d'erreur opendata en vrac :
nom de société fictive
no siren fictif
je te conseille de prendre le résultat après pré-processeur https://github.com/Jungle-Bus/ref-EU-EVSE/blob/gh-pages/opendata_stations.csv
ou d'appliquer les 289 correctifs connus https://github.com/Jungle-Bus/ref-EU-EVSE/blob/master/fixes_networks.csv + la validation/formatage des numéros de téléphone ou passer via osmose
Cordialement,
Marc
OSM_RogerWilco (2026-01-04 18:59:08+00:00): Moin bison166,
Deine letzten Änderungs-Kommentare heißen nur noch "Anpassungen". Das ist wenig aussagekräftig. Magst Du wieder bessere Kommentare schreiben, aus denen besser hervorgeht, was genau Du getan hast?
Danke! :-)
Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
elwwan (2026-01-03 14:52:08+00:00): Source : https://panoramax.ign.fr/?background=aerial&focus=pic&map=19.64/43.4128681/5.9221465&pic=c13edf71-146d-4fe5-82d2-0420410b1fb9&pic_score=AB&seq=1f695b19-d3b9-4a3b-89ef-726f016c76cd&speed=250&theme=default&xyz=134.65/0.51/30
B252697 (2026-01-03 14:58:03+00:00): I frequent Lakeside to visit relatives and walk around Jurong Lake Gardens / Chinese Gardens area. I noticed 2 major errors of this region in OpenStreetMap:
1) The red dotted footpath exists but it is not drawn correctly.
2) Enabling Business Hub does exist at this location but its parcel is not that large and does not extend so closely to Lakeside MRT. Rather, between Lakeside MRT and Enabling Business Hub, there is a green patch of land that can also be clearly seen via satellite imagery. But it is not reflected on OpenStreetMap.
B252697 (2026-01-03 14:59:20+00:00): I've tried to edit and make the changes, would appreciate reviews and edits to help make the OpenStreetMap data of this region more accurate. Thanks!
whb (2026-01-07 10:07:50+00:00): Guten Tag,

den Poller am nördlichen Ende des Lindenwegs gibt es also nicht mehr?
Siehe: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=482632593046891&focus=photo

Viele Grüße
whb
Moepmoep (2026-01-08 09:20:47+00:00): Vor ein paar Tagen war dort keiner.  Ob das Loch zubetoniert ist, konnte man wegen Eis und Schnee nicht sehen.  Dazu gibt es einen Hinweis mit Diskussion:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5115845

Daß der Poller nur temporär entfernt wurde, läßt sich nicht ausschließen.  Am Wochenende wollte nochmal jemand hingehen und ein Foto machen.
whb (2026-01-08 09:57:06+00:00): Danke, den Hinweis hatte ich übersehen.
EneaSuper (2026-01-04 10:24:08+00:00): Ciao, ehm, non credo che "mezzi a servizio delle funzioni religiose" sia il valore corretto, magari potrebbe essere messo in descrizione, cosa dici?
camminatoreseriale (2026-01-04 11:30:29+00:00): In realtà è una key condizionale che serve proprio a usare testo libero per casi come questo, “individual (non-standardised, text-based) signs”, insomma: questo caso qui.
Casomai si può usare il “destination” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:motor_vehicle%3Ddestination), ma non è altrettanto corretto e, anzi, a seconda delle varie interpretazioni è dedicato al solo traffico locale (da noi corrisponde a una sorta di “escluso residenti/frondisti”).
Oppure, meglio, possiamo riformulare il testo concisamente in inglese “vehicles for religious services”, che è comprensibile a prescindere dalla lingua, che dici?
camminatoreseriale (2026-01-04 11:31:08+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motor_vehicle:conditional
EneaSuper (2026-01-04 12:17:59+00:00): Ah ok, ho capito, grazie del chiarimento!

A questo punto sì, direi che è il caso di usare l'inglese 🙂
redd (2026-01-03 15:34:58+00:00): Danke!
HugoC01 (2026-01-03 15:13:56+00:00): J'ai pas eu le temps de finir je finirais dans 1h ou 2
HugoC01 (2026-01-03 17:15:49+00:00): comme promis j'ai fini !
B252697 (2026-01-03 15:24:13+00:00): During recent walks at Chinese Gardens, I found that there were still some inaccuracies in how features and paths were displayed on OpenStreetMap. Have tried my best to edit them. Would appreciate if others can help to further follow up. Thanks!
Gazer75 (2026-04-01 06:39:04+00:00): Please stop tagging motorway where there is non signed. The motorway tag should only be from/to the motorway signs.