piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Rouyki (2025-03-19 12:14:45+00:00): Thank you for your response. Since this is a small county in China, I have been mapping it on my own recently. You can understand that such work is tedious and repetitive, and my energy is limited. Earlier, I focused on mapping this area for a period of time.

I also understand your point about referring to OSM Wiki standards, but for the sake of display consistency and the phased nature of mapping, I am handling it this way for now. Meanwhile, you can see that the temples on the hills around Shehong have all been mapped in this manner. Of course, if more people join in to improve the map, they are more than welcome.While marking them as landuse=religious, outline the buildings.
tatsiana-krauchanka (2025-03-20 09:00:01+00:00): Thank you for your response and for all the work you’ve put into mapping this area. We truly appreciate your dedication, especially given the complexity and effort involved in mapping such a region.
We understand your reasoning for handling it this way and the importance of maintaining consistency in display. At the same time, following the OSM Wiki guidelines helps ensure that data remains accurate and useful for everyone in the long term. 
For now, a good approach could be to gradually adjust the tags while maintaining clarity - for example, outlining individual buildings while also using landuse=religious for the surrounding area. Of course, if you prefer, we’re happy to collaborate and refine the mapping together.

Thanks again for your contributions.
ivanbranco (2025-03-12 15:10:21+00:00): Hi Mintusha98,
you removed all the tags from two highways, mistake?
Mintusha98 (2025-03-13 03:12:57+00:00): Thank you for the valuable feedback. I reverted the changes. I will pay closer attention to these things. Please feel free to point out similar mistakes in future.

Regards,
Mintusha V S
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-12 15:00:47+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2969647676
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351498141

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
cuzi (2025-03-13 10:52:00+00:00): I was wondering, is there a reason why you add the address to the building outline even though there are already address nodes present?
CasGroenigen (2025-03-19 10:38:33+00:00): I'm pretty sure that the standard practice in the US is to have the Address on the building outline if available.
Perhaps it would be good to merge these new outlines with the already existing addresses too.
A67-A67 (2025-04-22 22:37:18+00:00): Please don't add descriptions to the name-tag. The tags amenity=restaurant and tourism=hotel make the distinction, while the name tag is for the name only.
b-jazz (2025-05-05 16:09:55+00:00): Why are you adding the neighborhood border when it already exists (https://osm.org/way/646100522)? Please remove it so there are duplicates. Thanks.
RedAuburn (2025-03-12 15:26:44+00:00): no remnants, better mapped by https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11189146867
Cebderby (2025-03-16 07:54:48+00:00): Not sure about that:
https://archaeology.co.uk/articles/news/the-rose-rises-again.htm
RedAuburn (2025-03-16 13:42:38+00:00): looking into it more - it looks like it's visitable (not just buried under an office block) have reverted deletion, thanks
aceman444 (2026-07-30 06:10:32+00:00): Zdravim, preco by to malo byt pedestrian namiesto footway?
ticho2 (2026-07-30 09:20:38+00:00): Preco by to nemalo byt? Hodi sa mi to sem tisickrat viac ako footway. Plus na OSM wiki je pri footway nejasne ci sa moze pouzivat na polygony, zatial co pri pedestrian je to jasne.
habi (2025-03-15 22:45:43+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=drinking%20water impliziert Trinkwasser, also ist das nun `no` saran etwas ein Widerspruch ;)
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 10:52:54+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163533579
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 11:17:25+00:00): Fatto revert.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163605608
DodoGTA (2025-04-03 15:00:10+00:00): O kodėl „Maxima“ prekybos centras atsidūrė pramoninėje zonoje?
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 10:53:03+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163533676
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 11:17:26+00:00): Fatto revert.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163605608
NeisReview (2025-03-12 17:38:22+00:00): #DataImport

Hi, welcome to OSM!

With this and your latest changesets, you've added a significant number of features that appear to share similarities in their tags. Could you please let us know more about the source of your mapping activity? Is this a data import?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks!
NeisRevert (2025-03-21 20:33:14+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163743343
kapazao (2025-03-12 18:20:44+00:00): Hola, he creado un tema en el foro de OSM España acerca de este tema (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/plenoil-ahora-es-plenergy/127287).

Te rogaría que parases la modificación de nombres de gasolineras, que estás haciendo incorrectamente, y tuvieras en cuenta que este es un proceso que se está haciendo automáticamente para estos casos y hay que conocer las normas de nombrado de elementos y cómo se hacen este tipo de cambios con el consenso de la comunidad.
Puedes comentar lo necesario en el foro.

Un saludo y gracias por tus contribuciones.
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 10:53:30+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163533908
mueschel (2025-03-13 10:40:44+00:00): Please check your recent edits, there are many tags with spelling mistakes like 'sourcee' or 'water way'.
mueschel (2025-03-16 09:58:20+00:00): Please pay attention to the direction of waterways - the way in OSM has to point in the same direction as the water flows.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 17:21:08+00:00): Hello!

You used
building=Residential Building
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1366632306/history

Have you maybe meant
building=residential
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 10:53:37+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163534815
eggie (2025-03-12 17:45:41+00:00): Dag robbre  Je hebt het pad met access=no op Verboden Toegang. Voor wie is dit dan verboden? 

Ik heb  voorlopig access=no verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
tordans (2025-03-17 05:24:45+00:00): Thanks for the update. Will have to go there again to see all those changes :-). Just saw at https://www.tempelhoferfeld.de/pflege-entwicklung/aktuelle-massnahmen/#c4372 that there might be even more new things…
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163534832
pavvv (2025-03-12 18:48:41+00:00): Nazwa stacji to "Wrocław Osobowice", a nie "Wrocław Osobowice WO2". Zobacz jak wyglądają tagi każdej innej relacji linii kolejowej.
Programista Kolejowy (2025-03-12 20:30:37+00:00): Tak tylko że łącznik najpierw kończył się na podg Teresin, a potem sterowało tym WO2, a stację Osobowice masz na wprost
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 10:53:44+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163534903
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 10:55:41+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163535072
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 10:55:48+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163535159
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 10:55:58+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163535335
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 10:56:05+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163535435
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 10:56:11+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163535562
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 11:17:27+00:00): Fatto revert.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163605608
Henry572 (2025-03-14 07:47:29+00:00): Hallo 2500,
weißt du noch, in welchem Zustand das Telefon ist? Normalerweise sind die ja nicht mehr in Betrieb, bei manchen steht eine Fehlermeldung auf dem Display, andere sind schon ganz kaputt. Das könnte man dann noch eintragen, auch wenn StreetComplete nicht danach fragt.
Viele Grüße,
Hendrik
kartler175 (2025-03-15 12:16:42+00:00): Please work more carefully:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-73.73747&lat=45.35639&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
And please do not overlap areas with identical key natural or landuse.
NeisReview (2025-03-12 17:38:57+00:00): #DataImport

Hi, welcome to OSM!

With this and your latest changesets, you've added a significant number of features that appear to share similarities in their tags. Could you please let us know more about the source of your mapping activity? Is this a data import?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks!
NeisRevert (2025-03-21 20:33:40+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163741078
joost schouppe (2025-03-12 16:40:58+00:00): Will revert in a minute, just trying to find an issue in the production version of OnWheels
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 10:56:35+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163536318
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 10:56:44+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163536672
ygcgjp5 (2025-03-19 16:05:43+00:00): niekas nedraudžia, tik nesuprantu kokia prasmė iki tokio lygio pridėlioti taškų? ypač individualių stovėjimo vietų žymėjimas...
Bravo_two_zer0 (2025-03-19 17:49:04+00:00): o kokia prasmė šito komentaro?
ygcgjp5 (2025-03-22 19:08:09+00:00): Tiesiog noriu sužinoti ar pasikeitus Megos aikštelės eismo tvarkai ar aplinkinių teritorijų išplanavimui kažkada ateityje ir darant žemėlapio pritaikymą bus galima viską pratrinti ir suvienodinti, ar galbūt kuriate kažkokį produktą apimantį Megos aikštelę ir jums šio detalumo išlaikymas yra ir bus reikalingas.
mueschel (2025-03-14 18:06:47+00:00): Hi,
the keys you added contain spaces and units - this is not common and doesn't follow usual tagging schemes.

I also have trouble making sense of the easting/northing - these coordinates seem to point to somewhere close to Chester, but not Belfast.
GeoConor (2025-03-14 18:41:15+00:00): Hi the GNSS station cords are in Irish Grid National Grid (not OSGB).  I would like to keep the numerical values as these are important metadata for users who may use the station.  Can you advise correct format?   Cheers CG
mueschel (2025-03-15 11:04:08+00:00): We don't yet have a proper scheme for such coordinates, apart from the 'utm' tag. For the moment I'd suggest to use a tag like "coordinates" including all information:

coordinates = 12345678 9876543 XYZ

XYZ would be the system of measurement, e.g. ITM (which seems to be the current version of the Irish Grid)
GeoConor (2025-03-15 12:10:37+00:00): I can add ITM coords tags. IG75 is still in use in NI and the mapping coordinate system for OSNI. OSI use ITM. Users accessing this public RTK feed will be collecting data in IG
GeoConor (2025-03-15 12:12:51+00:00): For mapping etc. Hopefully some OSM mappes will use the feed for field mapping apps etc for 👍🏼
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 10:56:53+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163537019
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 10:56:59+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163537159
Hidden Mountain (2025-06-02 10:49:08+00:00): Добрый день, подскажите, откуда появилось название у вершины? Вы совершали восхождение? Или есть другая подтверждающая информация, что кто-то его совершил и дал название?
SergeyPo (2025-06-02 13:18:43+00:00): Добрый день! Знакомый парень, который совершал восхождение, попросил добавить название (у него нет компьютера, только телефон). Так что я на 100% не уверен в корректности названия. Если есть другая информация, можете поменять / удалить эту правку.
Hidden Mountain (2025-06-02 13:31:58+00:00): Сейчас более и менее устаканились все названия вершин, поэтому добавление новых хотелось бы совершать при наличии доказательства восхождения. Фото\видео с вершины, текст записки и другие факты. Идеально ссылку на пост в соц сетях. Чтобы не было редактирования и присвоения названий с дивана, так как это не спортивно. А на этом участке я вообще не уверен, можно ли выделить отдельную вершину. Поэтому пока я ее удалю, если ваш друг сможет предоставить факты, тогда вернем обратно.
SergeyPo (2025-06-02 14:27:59+00:00): Ага, хорошо
ivanbranco (2025-03-12 17:50:58+00:00): Ciao, é davvero aperto ventiquattro ore su ventiquattro tutti i giorni della settimana?
user_22621748 (2025-03-12 17:56:49+00:00): No gli orari sono ancora da definirsi,era giuto per vedere se andava bene.
andrebbe eliminato lightning cintactess
e capire perché aprendo i tags si vedono in formato testo.
Grazie per avermi scritto
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 10:57:05+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163537486
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 11:17:28+00:00): Fatto revert.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163605608
totera (2025-03-26 00:07:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10309176 è un centro logistico, non ci sono superfici di vendita
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 10:58:05+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163537681
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 10:58:09+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163537905
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 10:58:15+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163538048
NeisReview (2025-03-13 06:41:23+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
NeisRevert (2025-03-14 06:57:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163597762 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove testdata
kubahahaha (2025-03-12 19:14:06+00:00): Dzięki, zapomniałem o tej uwadze. Jeszcze ten kawałek fixnąłem

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163542073
Dawid2849 (2025-03-12 19:17:33+00:00): O, nie widziałem tego fragmentu. Dzięki za uzupełnienie mojej edycji
Syl (2025-03-12 23:32:11+00:00): Bonjour, il y a plusieurs problèmes dans ces modifications :
Vous avez ajouté 8 commerces de tickets en plus alors qu'il existait déjà sous forme de surface.
Vous avez mis que cette poubelle accepte tous les déchets organiques ce qui a m'a connaissance n'est pas le cas : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5152516460
Vous avez ajouté un attribut de recyclage vide sur cette poubelle : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11772363556

Pouvez-vous indiquer clairement dans les groupes de modifications et sur votre profil le groupe pour lequel vous contribuez ? La mention seule "SERM" n'est pas très claire et n'aide pas vraiment à comprendre.
Melvyn_BRACON (2025-03-13 10:09:58+00:00): Bonjour, 
Merci pour vos remarques. 
Concernant la création de 8 pointes de boutique vente de billet, cela est du à notre méthodologie de renseignement de ces services. En effet un polygone existait déjà et je l'ai laissé mais renseigner les points  permet de connaitre le nombre de guichets disponibles (ainsi que leur localisation dans ma pièce), ce qui n'était pas renseigné sur la forme existante. 
Pour ce qui est des poubelles, je me suis appuyé sur des photographies que j'ai prises en gare (sous autorisation de prise de vue) début 2024, elles ne sont donc peut être plus d'actualité. Je vais donc remodifier cela en fonction de ce que vous me dites et je réactualiserai au besoin lors de ma visite de site dans 2 semaines afin de coller au mieux à l'aménagement actuel. 
Concernant le groupe de modification, je me permet de vous rediriger vers la page wiki osm: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/France/Gares_SERM. Mon profil est bien renseigné sur cette page mais le lien à en effet été cassé, je me charge de régulariser ca pour faire en sorte que les modifications soient d'autant mieux renseignées. 
Merci pour votre vigilance
Syl (2025-03-13 11:12:54+00:00): Bonjour,
Pour la boutique votre façon de faire va à l'encontre des bonnes pratiques, voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Un_item,_un_objet_OSM Si vous voulez ajouter les guichets vous pouvez en utilisant un attribut différent (je ne sais pas si il existe déjà, peut-être faudra il l'inventer), mais pas en mettant qu'il y a 8 boutiques alors qu'il n'y en a qu'une.
Merci d'avoir corrigé les poubelles.
Merci pour le lien vers la page du wiki, ma demande était justement de mettre ce lien dans vos groupes de modifications et sur votre profil, il n'est pas facile à trouver sinon.
Melvyn_BRACON (2025-03-13 13:59:02+00:00): Rebonjour, 
J'ai bien pris en compte vos remarques et procédé aux modifications. Merci
CurlingMan13 (2025-04-01 03:13:50+00:00): C/S reverted
Max-Kritic (2025-03-14 07:48:25+00:00): Tes erreurs de landuses avec les polygones. Peux-tu revoir comment faire polygones !

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=3.36479&lat=49.89132&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=1.00&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Glassman (2025-03-13 21:38:46+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

There were a number of errors. Some minor other significant. For example, you dropped off the tourism=museum tag needed for the Feiro Marine Life center to be properly tagged. 

Also there are numerous instances where you added a building where one, usually better mapped, already existed. 

You added 2 restaurants that already were tagged. 

Because there are so many errors, I'm going to revert this changeset. I'll send you a message about OSM that might help you with future edits.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163539316
Glassman (2025-03-13 21:41:12+00:00): Also - save and upload your edit before moving to a distant location.
Frans S (2025-03-17 14:30:23+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
You did not tag the crossings highway/waterway, Mostly a ford.
Be sure you connected both waterway and highway when adding a crossing tag.
Best regards
rivermont (2025-03-14 17:35:15+00:00): If you're going to update old TIGER roads, please remove the TIGER reviewed tags; their purpose is to indicate which roads have not been updated (re w18901119). And please don't create *new* roads with tiger:reviewed=no ... that kind of defeats the purpose of the tag (re w1366655128).
UE_Su (2025-03-16 09:21:34+00:00): Hi rivermont,
I am sorry, but the instructions of the maproulette challenge does not say anything about that. In general the last updated date indicates, that it is in fact altered at a later date. Maybe someone can do an automated editing and remove the reviewed tag on all roads which have been altered later. In will remove this tag from now on in the future.
Best regads,
UE-Su
カシオペア (2025-03-14 10:34:25+00:00): Why delete all these residential areas, and much more in other changesets?
ssundell (2025-04-07 15:55:34+00:00): Mikä homma?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163540039