piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
HSL_HRT (2025-12-10 09:28:38+00:00): Hei! Olit muuttanut tämän pyörätien footway'ksi. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45598982 En tiedä huomasitko mutta tällä pätkällä oli "pyörätieajoilta" foot=no -tagitys, joka sillä edelleenkin on. Nykyisellään se on siis kävelytie jossa erikseen kävely estetty, eli väylä jota pitkin reititys ei toimi. Mikä lie tilanne paikan päällä maastossa? Olisiko tuo foot=no tarve poistaa?
Ahtojää (2025-12-10 10:39:30+00:00): Hei, tämä on ilmiselvästi unohtunut, saa korjata.
HSL_HRT (2025-12-11 07:33:02+00:00): Miten tuo sitten kannattaisi korjata? Minulla ei ole viime ajoilta paikallistuntemusta juuri tuosta kohtaa.
Ahtojää (2025-12-11 08:39:43+00:00): Voin korjata itsekin lähipäivinä. Koko tagin foot=* voisi ottaa poiskin, mutta siellä oli muistaakseni myös D4 joten voisi olla =designated.
HSL_HRT (2025-12-11 09:28:46+00:00): Tämä selvä. En itse siis tee mitään tuolle nyt.
HSL_HRT (2026-02-09 06:57:33+00:00): Merkkasin tämän nyt foot=desginated
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:34:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:34:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
Joe-w (2025-11-04 18:53:37+00:00): not sure on your definition of 'local style', but I think I would prefer to see this reverted. See the wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapping_addresses_as_separate_nodes_or_by_adding_to_building_polygons
JassKurn (2025-11-05 14:18:05+00:00): Hi Joe-w. Exeter and East Devon area has always been dominated by mapping addressees as nodes, usually within the building. Done primarily by areas three main mappers. Myself, Guy, and Wilpin. 

I personally didn’t bother with address for several years, and initially added them to buildings. When I started adding addresses in Topsham, it became obvious addressed buildings were nearly always wrong, or an assumption. From experience I found it was nearly always not possible to verify there was only one address is associated with a building. Then accepted the local style of adding address to nodes removed that issue."

The addresses added to buildings in our area are primarily from a user called sec147 in 2022.
His edits were questionable and appeared automated. He bulk added a large amount of addresses to polygons, often containing errors, and other issues.
His edits involved deleting address nodes, usually created by myself, Guy or Wilpin, and moving the data to polygons.

The link you give does not state or imply what I did was wrong? It also appears to be the creation of a single person? As is common in OSM, there is no clear rule

My edits were done to bring addressing into line with local mapping styles, with the next stage to find and fix errors created by sec147.

I see you've reverted my address edits. I wish you'd waited for me to respond first. You've done this by stating my edits are "undiscussed automated edits". My edits were not automated edits and clearly do not meet the common definition of that. I'll be a bit cheeky and state your reverts are undiscussed automated edits?
Joe-w (2025-11-05 15:07:01+00:00): Both styles have their place, I agree. The issue is making ~10,000 changes in an automated/mechanical edit, something the wiki advises against. I see these as imposing a personal style, and not objectively improving the map.

Regarding locality, we could both choose different areas and come up with different results. In politics, this is known as gerrymandering. It is worth noting that when looking at the UK as a whole, ~84% of address tags are on ways. This is an indicator of community preference.

I hope you'll agree these changes are both undiscussed (please provide context if I've missed any) and automated (ie, made using scripts or similar), and for those reasons, are best reverted to their former state.

Your prior work in this area has not gone unappreciated, and I hope you continue to contribute to OSM! :)
JassKurn (2025-11-05 17:35:25+00:00): I did not make ~10,000 changes in an edit, and the edits are not "automated/mechanical" with regard to how this is meant in OSM, or the intent.

The  mapping practice does follow local style. I'm not imposing this across the county so it does not need discussion.

The polygons with addresses in our area were mostly  added by sec147. Sec147 edits appear automated and have the type of issues that lead to the rules on automated edits, and imports.

But.... looking at my changesets I do feel they are too large and should have been broken up into smaller changesets.

I'm not going to revert your reverts, but I am going to go back and once again move, with regard to local style, addresses to nodes. They will be done in much smaller areas /. changesets.
They are not with OSM intent, "scripted" or "mechanical".
I will also, once gain, fix some of the issues created by sec147. Others will fix in seperate edits, or by visiting some specfic locations.
Joe-w (2025-11-05 18:33:19+00:00): Please do contribute fixes and improvements, including those to my edits, or of the edits from others!

Please *do not* continue to convert between accepted practices to match your own preferences, as it is discouraging to other users. At the very least, please communicate your intentions on the community forum before doing so. Thank you!
JassKurn (2025-11-05 20:26:03+00:00): My changes are done not as part of a personal quest, they are done to bring the mapping in line with the regional practice for adding addresses.

The vast majority of the changes are to to addresses added by a one person. Sec147. Edits that appear to be from an automated import, and which involved moving some nodes to polygons.

I strongly agree that we should discuss issues, but this comes back to being a local issue. The dominant practice used by local mappers is to add addresses to nodes. (I don't include sec147 as a local mapper).

I will be going ahead with the changes, but making the changesets cover a much smaller area, and specifically concentrating on the areas where sec147 added addresses.

If you wish to raise the issue in the discussion forum, go ahead. I'm happy to discuss this there,
Joe-w (2025-11-05 20:44:18+00:00): There is no regional style Jass, look at Heavitree, West Clyst, Cranbrook, or Taunton for counter examples! It's discouraging for you to be changing prior mapping - unless done alongside a clear improvement. That's the issue I have, and the reason I ask you not to continue.
JassKurn (2025-11-06 14:50:52+00:00): Using areas mapped by sec147 in or around Exeter misleads. 

Cranbrook is unusual as it's can be described as a personal project of one person

Taunton ? Thats nowhere near Exeter, it's in a differenct county. If I added data there I would respect the local mapping.
b-jazz (2025-11-05 03:21:53+00:00): FYI, the correct tag when numbering holes (fairways, greens, etc) is "ref", not "hole". I've fixed up this batch but thought you should know for future edits.
蕉饼电脑 (2025-11-05 03:32:26+00:00): 请勿使用layer=-1规避相互交叉建筑路径的错误提示
lilauid (2025-11-05 16:11:19+00:00): 抱歉，多謝閣下修正
NeisBot (2025-11-04 17:39:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-04 17:39:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Apartment in Leukerbad near thermal baths and Sportarena"
NeisBot (2025-11-04 17:39:46+00:00): Ad esempio, una versione più neutra e fattuale della tua descrizione potrebbe essere: "Appartamento a Leukerbad vicino alle terme e alla Sportarena"
---
(Auto-translation)
SafwatHalaby (2025-11-07 08:04:29+00:00): שלום ותודה על התרומה! אחרי השינוי שלכם, יש לכביש כאן זווית קיצונית. האם זה נעשה בכוונה?

נדמה שהזזתם בטעות את הכביש למקום לא תקין.
SafwatHalaby (2025-11-17 13:12:31+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174771384
RandomLipeño (2025-11-04 17:43:26+00:00): Mistakenly uploaded redundant Everydoor changeset from last week edits, will revert later
Frans S (2025-11-13 11:49:45+00:00): Hello Adrian.
You removed tags from residential highways. Please take into consideration then the tag 'residential' is in place.
Here, many roads go through rural/wood areas. Advise to change the tag to unclassified.
Best regards
Adrian Shobrooke (2025-11-13 12:16:34+00:00): Hi Frans.  I suspect I would have picked that up in my OSMI/OSMose  QA checks. Did you make the change to unclassified? Are you advising that I should do so for this or just in future?
Frans S (2025-11-14 10:36:25+00:00): Hi Adrian. Yes. I changed the tags to unclassified. And, yes, when you come across residential highways in the middle of woods e.d. Please change them as well.
Best regards
Adrian Shobrooke (2025-11-14 11:36:36+00:00): Thank you Frans.
silversurfer83 (2025-11-04 17:55:50+00:00): Nabend :)

du hast hier

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11899385216

einen Punkt verschoben. Ich tippe auf ein Versehen. Wenn ich recht habe, wäre es cool, wenn du den wieder an Ort und Stelle schieben könntest.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174206188
uprkos (2025-11-15 14:53:58+00:00): Hi, 
You deleted the tag 'building' in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1166315212

Kind request to review and correct please.
SomeoneElse (2025-11-04 20:47:08+00:00): Thanks!
chris66 (2025-12-10 08:37:53+00:00): Bürgerradweg, könnte man noch als "description" ergänzen.
GiovanniPen (2025-11-04 20:05:05+00:00): dov'è il duplicato?
GiovanniPen (2025-11-04 20:05:30+00:00): vedo che sempre tu avevi creato il nodo, che ora rimuovi...
ap47 (2025-11-04 20:58:54+00:00): Si, ma avevo corretto la posizione più giù esplicitando il nome:CT2.... ECC...
Grazie
GiovanniPen (2025-11-04 21:03:49+00:00): e dov'è quello corretto?
ap47 (2025-11-04 21:38:39+00:00): un poco più sotto presso via san giovanni li cuti : CT2_Etnean sensor community
Đuro Jiří (2025-11-10 15:21:11+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-11-06 23:52:26+00:00): Merhaba. Lütfen öğelerin geçmişini korumak için öğeleri silip yeniden çizmeyiniz. Mevcut öğeyi düzenleyiniz. Örn: bir otoparkı(way/1447010456)'ı silip aynı yere tekrar otopark (way/1447517791) çizmişsiniz. Bunun yerine eski öğenin düğümlerini sürükleyerek, eni düğüm eklemek için hat üzerinde dilediğin noktaya çift tıklayıp yeni düğümler ekleyerek de mevcut otoparkın şeklini düzeltmek mümkündü. (Bu arada otopark sadece bir örnek, aynı husus düzenlediğiniz başka öğeler için de geçerli.) Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Ve ayrıca lütfen iD editörde görünen uyarıları dikkate alınız. Birbirine paralel birçok yaya yolu çizmiş fakat bu yolları yol ağına bağlamamışsınız. Lütfen şu sayfayı okuyunuz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Unconnected_ways

Yol ağına bağlamadığınız birçok yoldan ötürü şunu da hatırlatma ihtiyacı duyuyorum. Eğer değişikliklerinizin amacı herhangi bir harita uygulamasında güzel bir görünüm elde etmek ise bu amaç yanlış. Lütfen bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Ayrıca oluşturduğunuz, üniversite sınırları belirleyen ilişkinin de devamlılığı yok. İlgili ilişkiyi düzeltebilir misiniz? Şunu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19793730

İyi günler.
Yog Sot (2025-11-05 00:18:58+00:00): Nie ma czegoś takiego jak sięgacz w nazwie. 
Nazwa musi być urzędowa, a te sięgacze to sa podjazdy do posesji, czyli serwisówki.
WojciechRem (2025-11-06 09:02:25+00:00): Ok, to mój początek. Czyli zostawię te dojazdy bez nazwy. Dzięki za sprostowanie. Chętnie przyjmę inne uwagi. Pozdrawiam serdecznie. Wojciech
arjunaraoc (2025-11-26 11:24:30+00:00): Please check my revision https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175149811#map=19/16.789177/80.851746 Please join OSM Andhra Pradesh telegram channel  https://web.telegram.org/k/#@osmandhra
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174208016
Roydon Olive (2025-11-05 07:25:31+00:00): Why did you change these two paths?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1389473613
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1389473614
I put them on the map based on actual gps data, you moved them to the wrong location. The source of your changeset has "gps" in it, but how are you using a gps? When I use gps I upload a gpx file and edit based on that and my changesets show that I used a gpx file, but your changeset does not say that you used a gpx upload.

Again, let me repeat this again, it is very frustrating to expend a lot of effort to go out and get accurate gps tracks and edit the map correctly, only to find that you have come along and moved things to wrong positions in giant changesets destroying all that hard work others have put in. Please stop doing that!
JiahuiY (2025-11-05 13:51:57+00:00): based on the comments, now I know your sorry ass don't know nothing about date analysis, you don't understand random error or shit.First, calibrate the satellite map with the mean of multiple gps file. The accuracy is far higher than that of your single gps data
Cortix (2025-12-22 12:27:09+00:00): Could you revert this changeset? The discussion with the IT community is clear. These relations must be deleted
eggie (2025-11-04 19:17:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Wanneer een instelling vertrekt zal het adres vast nog wel blijven. Dat heb je nu ook verwijderd.
Ook zal een gebouw niet opeens van vorm veranderen. Kijk nooit naar de daken bij een schuingenomen luchtfoto.
Geef concreet aan wat je hebt gedaan.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-11-04 19:24:41+00:00): Gebouw en adresnode hersteld.
HantDX (2025-11-04 19:11:44+00:00): О, это историческая панская усадьба здесь? А не подскажете, может знаете ещё источники, где можно почитать про неё/посмотреть фотографии? Я просто интересуюсь историческими усадьбами и мапплю их активно.
HantDX (2025-11-04 19:18:01+00:00): А, кажется нашёл: https://globustut.by/olkovichi_oshm/index.htm#mhouse
Andrey Blinov (2025-11-05 05:22:04+00:00): Да, я нашел ее на Глобусе. Хочу проверить еще конюшни в соседних Двор-Новоселках, потому что на Глобусе они помечены как снесенные не позднее мая 2025 г., а на карте все еще есть.
HantDX (2025-11-05 08:04:24+00:00): Я маппил Двор-Новосёлки, был там 2024-03-10. Тогда конюшни ещё стояли... если снесли, то оч жаль :/
marc__marc (2026-02-21 20:11:44+00:00): Hello,
what did you mean with camp_site 	association ?
the operator is an association ?
can you also move it to the correct location, I hope that people don't put tents precisely at the junction of the two roads
Regards,
Marc
eggie (2025-11-04 19:21:45+00:00): Geef svp aan wat je hebt gewijzigd.
Dit zegt niemand iets.
Winkels staan al gemapt op de adresnodes. Dan niet nogmaald op de gebouwomtrekken toevoegen.
Ook loopt nu opeens een oprijlaan dwars door de woningen?

Ik draai deze changeset terug wegens te veel schade aan de kaart.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-11-04 19:22:33+00:00): reverted by changeset #174209780
eggie (2025-11-04 19:26:31+00:00): Dit zijn allemaal fouten
warnings:almost_junction:highway-highway 	1
warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway 	1
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 	1
warnings:disconnected_way:highway 	1

De winkels stonden allemaal al op de kaart.
Niet zomaar wat gaan doen. Goed kijken svp van te voren. Maak eerst een soort plan voordat je van alles gaat wijzigen.

MVG
eggie
Langlaeufer (2025-11-07 19:51:09+00:00): Hi,
findest du es wirklich sinnvoll an Wald und Feldwegen (track) und Zufahrten (service) zu erfassen, dass dort keine Radwege existieren?
Meiner Meinung nach bläht dass nur sinnlos die Daten auf.
Grüße Langläufer.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174209597
SteMue (2025-12-06 16:03:16+00:00): Hallo Langläufer das mag sein,
um Datenmengen solltest Du die bei dem Tag weniger Sorgen machen als bei anderen Auswüchsen von OSM.

Die miese Fahrradnavigation ist aufgrund fehlender Tags ein großes Problem, daher ergänze ich alles, was ich kann, um die Wege genau zu klassifizieren. So gibt es 21 Jahre nach dem Start von OSM in Berlin-Brandenburg viele Wege und Straßen ohne Eigenschaften, aber jede Parkbank und jeden Papierkorb mit allein Eigenschaften.
Langlaeufer (2025-12-06 17:15:33+00:00): Ganz sicher nicht wegen fehlender lit=no,
Aber lassen wirs gut sein.
Glassman (2025-11-06 18:05:21+00:00): Landuse is not intended for building. Instead change the building tag from yes to retail.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174210014
Glassman (2025-11-06 18:05:39+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174210061
Glassman (2025-11-06 18:05:58+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174210345
Glassman (2025-11-06 18:06:25+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174210480
Glassman (2025-11-06 18:07:37+00:00): #TIP: square building by selecting the outline they just type a "q". Also street names are spelled because software has a hard time unabbreviating.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174210785
Glassman (2025-11-06 18:07:50+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174211018
Glassman (2025-11-06 18:08:03+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174211259
GinaroZ (2026-01-18 16:25:58+00:00): This road has been reverted back to highway=primary to match Scotland's trunk road network
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422167264/history
eggie (2025-11-04 20:42:21+00:00): Dag Sumurai..

Graag winkeld e.d. toevoegen aan de bestaande adresnodes.
 Nog een tip. Geen adressen toekennen aan gebouwomtrekken. De school heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode met amenity=school. 

MVG
eggie
Svalbard (2025-11-05 17:18:42+00:00): Hallo puma515, hast Du Dir die Lage Vorort angesehen? Ich bin heute dort vorbeigefahren und die L 116 ist in Richtung Lägerdorf ab Kreuzungsbereich mit der L 115 komplett gesperrt inkl. Radweg. Siehe auch [1]. Gruß Svalbard 

[1] https://www.schleswig-holstein.de/DE/landesregierung/ministerien-behoerden/LBVSH/Service/Baustellen/Dateien/2025/10_Oktober/251009_l116
puma515 (2025-11-10 22:31:17+00:00): Hallo Svalbard. 

Ich war hier nicht zum zeitpunkt der anpassung vor ort bin aber dort soweit ich mich erinnern vor ca 3 monaten dort durchgefahren. Meine anpassung erfolgte aufgrund der Erinnerung und das es mit opening_date=2025-06-30 erfasst war sowie 2 hinweisen das dort frei ist. 
Dein link sagt aus das nun gesperrt ist von vom 13. Oktober 2025 bis Ende Dezember 2026 also war es wohl dazwischen paar monate frei und wurde nun erneut gesperrt. 

Da du es grade schon angepasst hast ist es nun schon erledigt. Ich hatte diesmal erst zu spät die Nachricht gelesen.

Gruß puma515
Svalbard (2025-11-11 05:36:01+00:00): Hallo puma515, vielen Dank für Deine Rückmeldung. Gruß Svalbard
Tatfahren (2025-12-21 15:35:10+00:00): Warum hast du hier die Wege mit der Postleitzahl Grenze verbunden, und dort überall "highway=crossing" hinzugefügt? z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13281417768
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174211857
eggie (2025-11-04 21:40:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adres node.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
JeroenHoek (2025-11-04 21:06:36+00:00): Voor bruidskleding kun je deze beter pakken:

shop=clothes
clothes=wedding
Frans S (2025-12-07 13:54:46+00:00): Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task.

More work is required to complete this task and ensure that it is well mapped:
 * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object.

Keep on mapping!
LorenzoPesci (2025-12-11 09:17:49+00:00): Sulla basilica di s.Benedetto, cosa significa Imp_ass_f=4 ?
Ho chiesto spiegazioni all'autore ma non ha risposto: lo cancelliamo o qualcuno sa cos'è?
ivanbranco (2025-12-11 10:28:56+00:00): Cancellerei, la descrizione del changeset parla di "test"
SpinOff (2026-03-03 20:38:44+00:00): Jakby co, ktoś Ci właśnie usuwa te ścieżki: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179302857
felipeeugenio (2025-11-07 00:27:31+00:00): Hola Eduardo. No tiene mucha pinta de secondary la verdad. Pero en cualquier caso por favor conversar con la comunidad este tipo de cambios, sobre todo en lo que se refiere a clasificación de caminos, que no es un tema muy fácil. 
Saludos
Eduardo17172 (2025-11-08 13:04:17+00:00): Hola felipe estoy dentro de la comunidad y estoy averiguando como se hace pero creo q openstreetmap se refiere a carretera, autopistas con secundarias en este caso d-201 que conecta islon, lo que no entiendo es como se aplica en estas zonas urbanas, ya que por ejemplo isidoro campaña es una avenida que si bien existe simplemente es una avenida (su trafico es muy debil y rara vez la usa el publico) para llegar mas rapido, circuvalancion monjitas hace una vuelta más largo pero es mas gente la que tiene alrededor y necesitan utilizarla. También se puede ver vehiculos de carga o buses de transporte de personal minero usando esta avenida.
Eduardo17172 (2025-11-08 13:07:01+00:00): Perdón no agregue el link que vi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dsecondary
pavvv (2025-11-16 20:52:26+00:00): No nie do końca. Takie zmiany były już wycofywane.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1200805353/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162191930#c1389300
Lužicki Bieluch (2025-11-16 21:58:26+00:00): Niby prawda, pamiętam, choć z drugiej strony mamy Czechy, w których jest podobna sytuacja - dawno wygasłe wulkany m.in. koło Bruntala, są oznaczone jako "volcano", a nie "peak", wycofać można, choć jak dla mnie to na przymkniętych oczach
kubahahaha (2025-12-11 18:57:00+00:00): "w końcu chyba jednak można" - była jakaś dyskusja o tym?

Wrzuciłem na forum, ja nie jestem przekonany co do tego tagowania

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wulkany-w-polsce/139206
Aim311_ (2025-12-12 13:45:24+00:00): Skamieniałych wulkanów nie mapujemy jak aktywnych, bo 1. wprowadza to w błąd odbiorcę danych m.in. mamy prężnie działający dział gospodarki o nazwie turystyka wulkaniczna polegająca na odwiedzaniu aktywnych/czynnych wulkanów, a nie ... kamieniołomów. 2. jest to mapowanie pod render. 3. wskazuje na niedopracowany schemat mapowania i wyświetlania wulkanów. Grubszy problem do rozwiązania na forum.