piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2025-10-29 03:43:06+00:00): Hi, thanks for moving the footprint you added to try and place it at the base of the building though it should have been moved slightly further north and east to achieve this. You correctly recognised and deleted roof furniture, but the building footprint you added is too small; it should extend further south. This is clearer when cross refernecing another source such as Bing. Hope this helps.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173704166
Gregory Peony (2025-10-29 03:43:32+00:00): Hi, thanks for moving the footprint you added to try and place it at the base of the building though it should have been moved slightly further north and east to achieve this. You correctly recognised and deleted roof furniture, but the building footprint you added is too small; it should extend further south. This is clearer when cross refernecing another source such as Bing. Hope this helps.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173704166
rskedgell (2025-10-24 21:09:04+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Thanks for updating this. I have one suggestion, which is that if the paths are permissive for pedestrians (tagged as foot=permissive), then the same would probably apply for cyclists (bicycle=permissive). Tagging as bicycle=yes implies a legal right of way for cyclists.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Andy Lock (2025-10-25 07:48:49+00:00): Yes, you're right. I'll update this tomorrow. 
Thanks for the suggestion and guidance.
miche101 (2025-11-17 12:18:22+00:00): Warum löschst du beim Edeka das ganze 3D Mapping weg?

Hier die Note auch mitten in die Felder rein.. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4661158056#map=19/48.189507/11.806072&layers=N
BuckarooBanzai (2025-11-17 13:12:18+00:00): Hallo miche101,

das habe ich nicht mit Absicht gemacht, da ich bisher auch nicht wußte, dass dieses Objekt 3D Daten enthält.
Ich sehe alles nur in 2D und habe keine Abo-Pro-Version.

Die Notiz habe ich mit verlaub nicht proaktiv gesetzt und wenn, dann war das ein Fehler im Web-Editor, der nicht ganz stabil zu sein scheint.
miche101 (2025-11-17 15:03:18+00:00): ..ok, dafür wurde aber schon sehr viel gelöscht... wenn ich zähle ~ 17 Ways gelöscht.

Ich hab es mal rückgängig gemacht..
NeisBot (2025-10-24 08:10:35+00:00): Hi arUng raJa, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 8 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=173705096
Gregory Peony (2025-11-10 03:54:09+00:00): Hi, you duplicated building data here. In ID It's better to modify data if you can determine which feature it represents, rather than mapping it anew.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173705101
mavl (2025-11-15 10:55:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
gebux (2025-10-24 10:24:28+00:00): What source did you use for your edits? Your previous edits were of horrible quality and had to be reverted completely: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/fragwurdige-masseneintrage-von-wander-und-mtbrelationen-in-westosterreich/4963/38
JurajRiccany (2025-10-24 10:39:45+00:00): Hello, 

I am using my own GPS data on track that I have walked + walking/hiking bulletins for Soelden and Gurgl.
JurajRiccany (2025-10-24 10:41:04+00:00): However, if you believe some of those are completely wrong or I have miss clicked somewhere, happy if those are corrected. No doubt.
gebux (2025-10-31 10:55:39+00:00): Yeah right, I guess you had a busy summer since you mapped hundreds of hiking paths in CH, IT and now AT again. In all parts of Austria apart from Vorarlberg hiking paths are mapped by pathnumber, not haphazardly thrown into random relations like you did. Unfortunatly there is currently no available datasource to enter these routes from the comfort of your own home - you have to go out and walk the routes by yourself. Copying from commercial maps like you most likely did here is not allowed. 
I will revert your edits around Sölden.
NeisBot (2025-10-24 08:15:41+00:00): Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Online casino information website"
NeisBot (2025-10-24 08:15:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-24 08:15:47+00:00): Просто щоб допомогти проілюструвати, що я маю на увазі, ось як могла б виглядати ваша опис у більш нейтральній, фактичній формі: "Веб-сайт інформації про онлайн-казино"
---
(Auto-translation)
NeisRevert (2025-10-24 08:42:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173706360
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove spam
Fraxi (2025-10-24 09:17:00+00:00): Здравейте!
Ветеринарната клиника върху цялата сграда ли се простира(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256964869)? Като гледам на снимките от Bing Streetside, тя прилича на жилищна сграда(и е отбелязана с building=apartments). Ако сградата си е жилищна и обитаема, според мен е добре данните за клиниката да бъдат прехвърлени върху точка(node) на подходящо и по-точно място. В противен случай, може да се сложат по-подходящи тагове за самата сграда като building=hospital, building=clinic или building:use=clinic. Вие преценете.
Fraxi (2025-10-24 09:20:10+00:00): По принцип в https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/ можете да видите какви тагове се използват.
Fraxi (2025-10-24 09:32:33+00:00): Пардон, имала е таг building=apartments. А по отношение на тел. номера, "+" се слага пред "359" и след това има интервал.
joost schouppe (2025-11-07 10:45:36+00:00): 110000v seems like a lot for a minor_line...
Eric V (2025-11-07 12:11:27+00:00): Joops,

Thanks. A poor click.  Set to 20k as should be.
Have a nice day
NeisBot (2025-10-24 08:27:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-24 08:27:42+00:00): Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Pośrednik sprzedaży nieruchomości Bydgoszcz"
NeisBot (2025-10-24 08:27:49+00:00): Właśnie aby pomóc zilustrować to, co mam na myśli, oto jak Twoje opis mogłoby wyglądać w bardziej neutralnej, faktualnej formie: "Pośrednik sprzedaży nieruchomości Bydgoszcz"
---
(Auto-translation)
NeisReview (2025-10-26 10:05:41+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/173705985
kudlav (2025-11-14 22:11:05+00:00): Zdravím, bylo by lepší tagy změnit až poté, co dojde k realizaci. Teď máme v osm cykloobousměrky, které ale v terénu zatím neexistují.
hanoj (2026-01-08 17:39:12+00:00): Na základě čeho byly provedeny tyto změny? Mám obavu, že to nemá se skutečností mnoho společného.
multimob (2025-10-26 23:07:57+00:00): Merci pour le changement, mais il y a un problème : les bus 20 et 21 sortent de la rue Darchis et tournent à gauche en roulant sur ce qui est maintenant la piste cyclable.

On ne peut pas laisser une ligne de bus sur une piste cyclable sur OSM.

Pour adapter, on a besoin d'une info : sais-tu où passent ces bus et font leur arrêt ? Une source nous a dit que la partie au nord de la rue Darchis est inchangée et que l'arrêt de bus est toujours en service ; dans ce cas on doit remettre le statut de voie de service à ce morceau.

Merci d'avance pour ta réponse stp.
fredlenoir (2025-10-27 11:49:39+00:00): Bonjour , je viens de rendre sur place. Il existe sur la bande (voie) de gauche une piste cyclable bidirectionnelle; sur la voie de droite (en sens unique) un accès pour les bus exclusivement - avec un arrêt Bus tjrs bien présent. Je proposerais de créer une ligne Piste cyclable et un ligne Voirie à usage Bus exclusivement (l'attribut 'Service' est adapté pour  une voirie publique avec autorisation Bus uniquement ? ). bonne journée,
fredlenoir (2025-10-27 11:53:26+00:00): Sur le wiki d'osm , on préconise access=no + bus=designated  (cas de figure cidessus); motor_vehicle=no + bus=designated when shared by bicycles  (cas pour le quai des ardennes) . utiliser highway= service n'est pas à faire semble t il
nevw (2025-10-26 08:15:31+00:00): Hi, there are validity rules to comply with and one of these is that outer rings of multipolygons cannot share sides. I have edited it to make a valid example.
There are lots of examples to help you in how they are used.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
nevw (2025-10-26 08:27:58+00:00): If you want to create a buffer around the building that is not to be used for parking, you could draw that boundary and use as the inner for the relation instead of the building outline.
If you instead prefer to map four individual parking rectangles, then map them as separate areas and don't group them in a relation.
nevw (2025-10-26 08:29:13+00:00): All these comments are in relion to the Moree Met Office area.
nevw (2025-10-26 08:30:13+00:00): corr....All these comments are in relation to the Moree Met Office area.
kapi1525 (2025-10-24 09:35:18+00:00): Te przejście nie zostało czasem niedawno otwarte?
https://www.powiatwodzislawski.pl/nowa-organizacja-ruchu-na-granicy-panstwa-w-skrbensku.html
Tomek | Yanosik (2025-10-24 10:48:49+00:00): dzięki za wiadomość, dostaliśmy zgłoszenie o tym, że przejście jest zamknięte. Zweryfikuję raz jeszcze i dokonam edycji.
totera (2025-10-24 21:12:29+00:00): Ciao f_gonella, è vero che la mappatura non era corretta perché erano erroneamente indicati più parcheggi ma mi pare tu abbia eliminato informazioni utili (che hanno richiesto all'autore di quelle modifiche anche un certo lavoro), come questi percorsi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375658002/history
Nell'attesa che qualcuno mappi i singoli stalli avresti potuto mantenere quei percorsi, che anzi ti invito a ripristinare, semplicemente modificando il parking in parking_space e mantenendo il valore di capacity (come da https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space#Keys)
f_gonella (2025-10-27 08:39:11+00:00): Ciao @totera, hai ragione, l’utilizzo di parking_space sembra essere la soluzione migliore. Il parking_lot deve invece contenere la strada di accesso per ragioni di routing, così mi è stato segnalato dai tool di diagnostica.
Syl (2025-10-24 09:37:55+00:00): Bonjour, votre modification est incohérente. Vous avez marqué que c'est deux bouts de routes sont à la fois hors-service et en service.
La précédente modification parlait du passage en sens unique de cette rue, avez-vous des informations plus récentes qui disent le contraire ?
caboulot (2025-10-27 08:21:14+00:00): Bonjour. Au temps pour moi, non je n’ai pas plus d’information, je tentais juste de résoudre une tâche Maproulette concernant un passage piéton non rattaché à une voie grâce à l’imagerie BD Ortho.  Merci pour votre vigilance.
Syl (2025-10-27 10:14:13+00:00): Pour info des images aériennes plus récentes sont disponibles ici et dans plusieurs autres départements : Ortho Express IGN 2025. On peut y voir que la route a changé à cet endroit.
Andrew Chadwick (2025-10-24 12:37:52+00:00): It's still open for freight, isn't it? The Network Rail press release[^1], the Oxford Clarion[^2], and BBC Oxfordshire[^3] all say it's "currently open for freight".

IDK if it can be upgraded to passenger standards while being kept open for freight, but it is still in use[^4]. I think that means it's not under construction at present.


[1]: https://www.networkrailmediacentre.co.uk/news/major-boost-for-oxford-as-cowley-rail-line-to-reopen-for-passengers-after-more-than-60-years

[^2]: https://oxfordclarion.uk/cowley-branch-line-reopening-gets-the-go-ahead/

[^3]: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgql954g07do

[^4]: https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/search/detailed/gb-nr:MORRMAT/2025-10-31/0000-2359?stp=WVS&show=all&order=wtt
Mattingham83 (2025-10-24 12:45:58+00:00): Hello, you're quite correct! I'll change it back. Thanks for letting me know.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-24 09:30:55+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791651902

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Komboj (2025-11-02 18:16:33+00:00): Jest to obiekt użyteczności publicznej. Sala służy mieszkańcom wsi. Inne osoby często szukają tego obiektu ponieważ jest za budynkiem prywatnym oddalony od głównej drogi.
eggie (2025-10-24 13:10:39+00:00): Dag DillenGJ  Ik heb het pad gewoon vastgemaakt. Dat kan met iD ook. Zolang je maar niet knipt in die busroutes. 
De Borculose weg hoeft echter niet opgeknipt te worden.
Bij de Es zat een los eindje.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=173706945

MVG
eggie
Dillen GJ (2025-10-24 17:25:24+00:00): Bedankt Eggie !
Ik blijf toch voorzichtig met ID juist in combo met Ipads vinger systeem.
Bovendien na opslag-knop aangeraakt te hebben wordt 9 van de 10 keer vlakken of lijnen NIET opgeslagen… Pas na refresh en opnieuw de opslag-opdracht gegeven te hebben wordt de mutatie ECHT verwerkt… Daarom zeeeer voorzichtig met ID (ook geboren uit ervaringen uit het verleden)
Dillen GJ (2025-10-24 17:32:29+00:00): Ik sluit tevens de note nu van de anonieme tipgever
dpolovinkin (2026-03-11 08:44:46+00:00): hi, care to explain why you deleted almost all points I've added here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155756718 in this changeset? I see no comments about it here
surveyor54 (2025-10-24 09:03:26+00:00): CS-Kommentar: Ergänzungen Naturschutzgebiet
NABILTR90 (2025-10-24 09:39:36+00:00): الدكتور محمد نبيل الطرشان
Prusaker (2025-10-24 13:19:41+00:00): Добрый день.
Пожалуйста, поаккуратнее с удалением линий. Вы удалили здание больницы. Пришлось его восстанавливать.

И я очень попрошу вас, когда добавляете названия улиц, пользоваться руководством по именованию названий для РБ: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Be:Belarus:%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%96%D0%BB%D1%8B_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BF%D1%96%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%9E

После вас приходится очень много править, чтобы привести названия улиц и адреса к стандарту.

Заранее спасибо.
fortera_au (2025-10-26 21:29:08+00:00): Thanks for doing that!
MappingMore (2025-10-29 15:28:26+00:00): Hi Footsteps of Ancestors, thank you very much for acknowledging this. I’m glad to expand my knowledge and understanding and always happy to improve the map for all.
StadtLandFluss27 (2026-01-31 17:10:20+00:00): Hi, 
dieser Änderungssatz hat bei vielen Bushaltestellen, bei denen das bus_stop-Tag schon am Mast/Wartebereich angebracht war zusätzlich nochmal an der stop_position angebracht.
Meinem Verständnis nach entspricht das nicht dem Tagging-Schema (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=bus%20stop?uselang=de), nachdem das bus_stop-Tag nur an die stop_position soll, wenn es keine Wartebereiche in der OSM gibt. 
Auch auf den meisten Karten, die Bushaltestellen abbilden, sieht es jetzt so aus, als stünden da 4 Masten, was in meinen Augen weder richtig noch besonders professionell aussieht.
Ich meine es nicht böse, mich stören diese 4 Masten einfach nur ein bisschen ^^. Vielleicht erschließt sich mir der Grund für Deine Änderungen aber auch einfach nicht?
Viele Grüße :)
berndw (2026-01-31 18:42:52+00:00): Hi, danke für die Anfrage.

Ich stimme dir zu, es ist nicht korrekt.
Ich meine sogar, dass ich das korrigieren wollte, ist mir wohl durchgegangen. 

An manchen Haltestellen waren entweder nur eine Postion mit allen Eigenschaften nach PTv1 an der Straße selbst oder eine nicht allzu genau positionierte Plattform erfasst.

Ich schau mir das zeitnah an

Danke für den Hinweis
berndw (2026-01-31 19:16:26+00:00): Ich habe das an allen Positionen korrigiert, bei denen ich der letzte Editor war, waren doch ein paar mehr als ich dachte, da ich wohl ziemlich fleissig war

Zur Info
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177938042
StadtLandFluss27 (2026-02-05 23:39:07+00:00): Vielen Dank! :)
Bienson (2025-10-27 04:34:42+00:00): Hier gibt es keine 8 verschiedenen Krankenhäuser. Bitte korrigieren.
Keek4600 (2025-10-27 09:01:32+00:00): Ich habe die Funktionen jetzt auf Gebäudeteile gelegt.
NeisBot (2025-10-24 09:48:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-24 09:48:42+00:00): Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Cerrajeros en Av dels Germans Maristes 28 Valencia"
NeisBot (2025-10-24 09:48:47+00:00): Solo para ayudar a ilustrar lo que quiero decir, aquí está cómo podría verse tu descripción en una forma más neutral y objetiva: "Cerrajeros en Av dels Germans Maristes 28 Valencia"
---
(Auto-translation)
NeisReview (2025-10-26 10:04:55+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173723457
NeisBot (2025-10-24 10:00:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-24 10:00:42+00:00): Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Nord Ambulanse air ambulance in Poland"
Marek-M (2025-10-24 11:49:21+00:00): Reklama w OSM nie jest tolerowana. Czym miał być ten punkt, który chciałeś dodać? To co utworzyłeś jest kompletną bzdurą, bo przecież Nord Ambulanse nie ma siedziby na ulicy/chodniku. Wycofuję tą edycję, bo jest kompletnie nieprawidłowa.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173714018
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-24 12:06:07+00:00): Thanks Marek-M.
Martinligabue (2025-10-24 10:07:00+00:00): why was the height removed?
Map47 (2025-10-24 10:40:06+00:00): Salve Martin Ligabue,
L'altezza dell'edificio non è stata eliminata, vedi il tag "height"
Hai usato "building:height" per definirla, in JOSM ne sconsiglia l'uso.
Vedi anche https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:height
Buon mapping
Martinligabue (2025-10-24 10:45:10+00:00): grazie!
NeisBot (2025-10-24 10:03:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-24 10:03:42+00:00): Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Nord Ambulanse medical services"
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-24 12:05:58+00:00): Thanks Marek-M.
SomeoneElse (2025-11-02 23:31:30+00:00): For info: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18910
rempshaener (2025-10-24 11:40:19+00:00): Hallo,

hier habe ich keine Anmerkung.

Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2025-10-24 11:39:09+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.

Ich habe nur zwei Anmerkungen:

colour
Die Farben folgen der englischen Schreibweise, es müsste also „red“ sein.

description
Die Anzahl der Kupplungen kann in „couplings“ erfasst werden. Die Größen in couplings:diameter.
Zum Beispiel so:
couplings=2
couplings:diameters=B;B

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
pavvv (2025-10-28 13:32:48+00:00): Skoro to dojazd na lotnisko, to dlaczego Awicenny nie jest secondary?

Tak, to dojazd na autostradę, ale służący tylko ruchowi lokalnemu, bo dla tranzytu lepsza i szybsza droga jest przez A4 lub S8.

Już kilka razy ta droga była podwyższana i obniżania, a w międzyczasie nawet straciła numer. Czy coś się tutaj nowego stało, że nagle droga ma być secondary?
maraf24 (2025-12-19 19:13:31+00:00): Nie rozumiem pytania. Droga jest ważnym połączeniem na lotnisko i do autostrady, co wyrażnie opisałem. Jest nawet oficjalnie oznaczona jako dojazd na lotnisko. Co też napisałem. Usunięto tablice?
Robisz edycje nie mając do tego podstaw. Twoje "brak odpowiedzi" nie jest wystarczającym powodem do wycofywania zmian, bo nie odniosłeś się w żaden sposób do mojego opisu.
I chyba go nie czytałeś, sądząc po ostatnim pytaniu.
Bawisz się w wojnę edycyjną.
pavvv (2025-12-19 19:59:40+00:00): Proszę opisz sytuację bardziej szczegółowo. Droga jest połączeniem czego z lotniskiem?

Brak odpowiedzi jest wystarczającym powodem, ponieważ wiele razy podałem już powody za tertiary tutaj i nie zanegowałeś żadnego z nich w krócej niż nawet ten tydzień rekomendowany na wiki.

Stąd proszę o w miarę możliwości jak najszybszą odpowiedź: Co ta droga łączy z lotniskiem?
Bienson (2025-10-26 05:56:44+00:00): Kein parking=lane.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:parking=lane

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side
Alliegaytor (2025-10-25 04:25:05+00:00): Please take care not to connect the building nodes to the SRL
McCarte (2026-07-27 02:05:05+00:00): Robuster did you make a section of Bayview Avenue access=no?
NeisBot (2025-10-24 10:37:11+00:00): Hola Locomotorus xpst, bienvenido al proyecto OSM y gracias por tu contribución. 
Para hacer que la colaboración sea más fácil y ayudar a los demás a entender tus ediciones, es mejor agregar una breve descripción de los cambios que hiciste. Los comentarios claros ayudan a la comunidad a seguir tu trabajo y a proporcionar una retroalimentación mejor. Puedes encontrar consejos para escribir buenos comentarios aquí[1].
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi Locomotorus xpst, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-10-24 10:37:15+00:00): Basado en tus ediciones de mapa en este conjunto de cambios, he elaborado una sugerencia sobre cómo podría parecerse un comentario: "Agregué barrera de seto"
(Auto-translation)
---
Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added hedge barrier"