piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SIG Echirolles (2026-06-29 09:43:31+00:00): Bonjour 👋,

Je ne suis pas vraiment en accord avec votre correction, dans le sens où l'objet 1328814581 représente l'emprise d'un espace dédié au stationnement. 
A la rigueur, les emprises que vous avez créées sont complémentaires et pourraient être considérées comme des emplacements de parking dans cette emprise.

Par ailleurs, cette contribution a quelque part dégradé l'information car plusieurs tags, notamment la capacité, n'ont pas été reportés dans vos modifications.

Serait-il possible d'ajuster ces éléments à vos corrections, ou préférez-vous que je m'en occupe ?
SIG Echirolles (2026-07-10 14:19:44+00:00): Après vérification, je reviens sur mon premier constat. Les 2 emplacements de parking sont bien distincts et sont donc à prendre en compté séparément (on pourrait presque être un peu plus tatillon en découpant également en 2 le parking de 10 places, puisqu'il y a une d'entre elles qui est du stationnement de voirie sur l'espace public
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-05 15:49:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183702973 where the changeset comment is: revert removal of allegedly under-construction path; what counts is what is there, not what whoever constructs the path would like
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-05 15:49:12+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 183662286, 183662573, 183662628, 183664291, 183669627, 183702650, 183702684.
qstep (2026-06-07 13:08:06+00:00): Szia. Sima magánút ami egyébként járható, az access=private

Az access=no azt jelenti hogy kifejezetten tilos bárkinek bemenni, mondjuk felújítás, átépítés, veszély miatt.

Lásd wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate#Relation_to_access=no

"Sometimes access=no is described as a stronger version of access=private. For example, a stretch of roadway may be closed with a “Road Closed” sign and barricades due to serious damage to a road or a long-term construction project. There may be a physical reason why no one would realistically be able to traverse the road. If applicable, also map any barriers that prevent anyone from entering or traversing the road. "
Tomas Straupis (2026-06-05 17:12:56+00:00): Labas. Būtų gerai, kad mažesniais kiekiais pakeitimus darytum, nes vis dar labai painioji žymas, vis dar geometrijų negali tvarkingų nubraižyti. Tai tokius didelius labai daug laiko užima taisyti, visada labai norisi banaliai visą pakeitimą atšaukti.
Tomas Straupis (2026-06-05 17:19:04+00:00): Ne, per daug masiškai blogų pakeitimų. Kiek kartų gi buvo pasakota, kad nereikia iš kelių darytų žemėnaudos kraštų, o čia masiškai po visą Palangą. Tai nieko nelieka, kaip visą pakeitimą atšaukti.
Tomas Straupis (2026-06-05 17:19:47+00:00): Dvirtakį po savaitės apžiūrėsiu ir tvarkingai pats sužymėsiu.
PovilasDew (2026-06-05 20:35:24+00:00): Ok, bandysiu padalint changeset'us į smulkesnius.
Bus lengviau atsižvelgt į konkrečias revertint'as vietas jei tokios bus.

Kiti komentarai:
1)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1441273#map=12/55.8616/21.0752
Manau, kad reiktų padalinti šį  poligoną nes apima labai didelę teritoriją ir labai komplikuotos formos. Regia.lt ir Maps.lt pats miškas padalintas į Vilimiškės miškas ir Nemirsetos miškas.

2)
Dėl dviračių tako ar šaligatvio kaip ribos naudojimo. Laikiausi nuomonės, kad pėsčiųjų ir dviračių infra gali būti poligono riba, bet automobilių keliai ir gatvės negali. Gal dėl to kaip renderina ir vyraujančių tokios infrastruktūros pločių (šaligatviai siauresni, keliai platesni). Jei netinka tai ok.

3) Būsimas dviračių takas buvo žymėtas pagal Mapilary gegužės 21 d. nuotraukas, atkarpa tarp Dariaus ir Girėno gatvės ir Nemirsetos dar neturi aiškių kontūrų. Gal situacija po truputį keičiasi.
Tomas Straupis (2026-06-06 05:58:00+00:00): 1) tai nėra išskirtinai didelis poligonas, jis vis dar normalaus dydžio. 2) jau gal prieš dešimt metų praktiškai išsiaiškinome, kad net gamtos objektų negalima plakti ir tarkim vandens kelių centro linijų naudoti kaip žemėnaudos kraštinių, o keliai (nesvarbu kokie) yra išvis kita opera, tai niekaip negali būti žemėnaudos kraštinė.
PovilasDew (2026-06-06 11:25:53+00:00): 1) pats iš savęs nėra super didelis, bet komplikuotas mix iš smulkių poligonų apima ir Palangos kopas ir Pajūrio regioninio parko dykras ir visokį mix Karklėje. Kažkaip atskirt miesto (gyvenvietės) ir ne miesto miškus kiek įmanoma. Čia daugiau ateičiai, nes norėčiau paprastesnio išpildymo tokioj vietoj. Jei tai būtų vien retai apgyvendinta teritorija tai gal ir suprasčiau.
2) čia jau išsiaiškinom, atsižvelgsiu
Tomas Straupis (2026-06-06 12:22:26+00:00): Aš skaičiuoju būtent viršūnes, kas ir rodo geometrijų sudėtingumą, pats fizinis dydis (plotas kvadratiniais metrais) nėra svarbus. „Miesto“ ir „ne miesto“ miškų net apibrėžti objektyviai nepavyks, tai nereikia jų ir duomenyse niekaip skirti. Ir eilinį kartą nereikia prisigalvoti neegzistuojančių struktūrų ir subjektyvių taisyklių :-) Viską mes jau esame gerai su miškų žemėnaudomis padarę, nėra absoliučiai jokių problemų praktiniuose taikymuose, todėl nereikia nieko keisti. Jei turi REALIŲ PRAKTINIŲ problemų su tokia žemėnauda - apie jas ir papasakok - tada galima bus galvoti, kaip spręsti.
CraigPe (2026-06-05 18:39:41+00:00): Thank you for correcting my tagging mistake.
RedAuburn (2026-07-13 20:28:33+00:00): nice work! :)
Yunan973 (2026-06-07 15:12:03+00:00): Bonjour,

soit tu crées des places de parking individuelles https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space, soit tu crées un parking global https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity=parking en précisant combien il y a de places et en y intégrant les voies qui permettent d'y accéder.
Mais tu ne peux pas créer des zones correspondant à des places individuelles sans mettre d'attribut parking_space et dire que l'ensemble de ces places individuelles sont des parkings.

J'ai corrigé un de tes parkings https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1526485345/history, en parking (puisque tu as utilisé l'attribut parking), tu peux créer des parking_space (2 chemins fermés) dans cette zone pour préciser la position et le type de place de parking (normale ou pour handicapés) : voir ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=1283714359#map=20/48.4647215/7.9412076 pour avoir un exemple d'un parking global (intégrant la voirie) dont une des places est une place handicapée, les autres places individuelles (probablement non spéciales pour handicapés) n'ayant pas été représentées. Et ici un parking avec toutes les places individuelles https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=1241364505#map=19/48.414740/8.001291

Je te laisse corriger les autres visibles ici https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=7.73765&lat=48.60757&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
mueschel (2026-06-08 08:47:48+00:00): Hi, what does "internet_access:requires_pii" mean? This tag isn't used in any other place.
Nnifria (2026-06-08 08:41:26+00:00): З повернення до мапінгу! Велике дякую за інформацію)
yelisey90 (2026-06-05 19:26:01+00:00): reverted for the Writer's House: it's 3 levels from the back side
kingkingHK (2026-06-06 03:52:31+00:00): Why? Does it not exist? I can see it on aerial imagery.
kingkingHK (2026-06-19 08:37:59+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184304235
TrickyFoxy (2026-06-06 13:50:04+00:00): 👋 Something went wrong with the tags: https://osm.org/way/1524540637
nullroute (2026-06-05 18:01:44+00:00): I think landuse=recreation_ground better fits this feature as individual pitches have already been mapped. I considered tagging as leisure=sports_centre but I don't think this feature qualifies as it doesn't seem significant enough to me.

I also updated the sport= tag to reflect the courts being sized for pickleball as opposed to full size tennis.

Finally, I updated the name= to reflect signage and OSM convention regarding directional abbreviations.
IIVQ (2026-06-05 18:31:23+00:00): See changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158576143 for discussion
joost schouppe (2026-06-08 07:53:48+00:00): Dag professor,
Ik heb wat kleine verbeteringen aangebracht:
- zelfs voor Chiro zie ik meestal club=scout eerder dan youth_movement. Voor zover ik begrepen heb, is youth movement meer een politiek gebeuren. En zijn wat wij jeugdbewegingen noemen eigenlijk een soort variatie op scouting.
- Voor het GC heb ik er een amenity=community_centre + community_centre=cultural_centre van gemaakt. Ik denk dat de lading beter dekt. Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:community_centre
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-13 06:19:05+00:00): DWG revert - improper deletions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185631664
MarcoR (2026-06-06 07:23:28+00:00): Ciao e benvenuti su OpenStreetMap!

Il sentiero era mappato correttamente come privato (access=private); adesso che lo hai tolto come fa un tecnico, un medico o semplicemente una persona autorizzata dal proprietario, a raggiungere l'edificio a "Corte Orsetti"?
Ente 01 (2026-06-07 07:24:46+00:00): IO SONO IL PROPRIETARIO e non c'e alcun sentiero è un argine privato e chiuso a protezione della casa MIA, prima di agire per vie legali ho tolto il sentiero che non esiste, non ti preoccupare che un tecnico, un medico, o una persona autorizzata cioè NESSUNO lo sa il proprietario che sono io, come farla arrivare. TE CHI SEI? se vuoi tracciare dei sentieri riapri a Colle di Compito sulla collina  le strade antincendio. Grazie
MarcoR (2026-06-07 10:08:26+00:00): Gentile Ente 01,
io sono un volontario del progetto OpenStreetMap e le assicuro che non sono interessato ad entrare nella sua proprietà privata e men che meno ad autorizzare qualcuno a farlo contro la sua volontà. 

OpenStreetMap è un database che contiene tutti gli oggetti fisici che non siano temporanei e la cui presenza sia verificabile; la strada sterrata che lei ha eliminato è visibile dalle foto aeree. 

Le consiglio di leggere le seguenti pagine della wiki OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_practice#Mappa_ci%C3%B2_che_trovi_sul_territorio e https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Tra l'altro, OpenStreetMap spesso è utilizzata dalle forze dell'ordine, dagli operatori di soccorso e dai corrieri che portano le merci a casa dei clienti; se in futuro avrà bisogno di una qualche assistenza urgente o di ricevere della merce in tempi brevi, la mancanza della strada privata potrebbe causarle dei grossi problemi.

Senza considerare che, l'eliminazione di quella strada dal database non impedirà affatto a eventuali malfattori di girovagare per la sua proprietà; sono abbastanza sicuro che questi soggetti non usino affatto delle mappe per decidere dove possono o non possono andare!

P.S. io non ho ancora toccato alcun sentiero da quelle parti e comunque il codice penale, gli avvocati e la giustizia italiana, per favore, usiamoli per cose più serie, grazie!

P.P.S. non vedo strade antincendio mancanti a Colle di Compito, sono molto recenti? Qui posso vedere solo roba più vecchia di 2–3 anni; provi ad aprire una nota nel punto in cui mancano questi sentieri: se siamo fortunati qualche mappatore passerà da quelle parti.

Buon mapping,
Marco
ThiloForGeo (2026-06-06 12:29:56+00:00): Ist die Gaststätte Burgblick Hartenstein (304688233) geschlossen oder ist die nur die Station für die Pferde nicht mehr vorhanden? Anstatt den Punkt für die Gaststätte komplett zu löschen wäre ein Lebenszyklus Prefix vermutlich besser. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix
Benoît C MdP (2026-06-09 07:01:34+00:00): Bonjour ZorgIZ,

Aux dernières nouvelles, il y a avait bien une bande cyclable pour le DSC. Aurait elle été supprimée ?

Bonne continuation

Benoît
Marek-M (2026-06-07 20:42:15+00:00): Cześć, w wartościach tagów `destination*` porobiłeś kilka literówek przy nazwach miejscowości. W nazwach miejscowości skróty rozwijamy, tak samo jak w nazwach ulic - również w tagach `destination`, bo bywają one odczytywane przez nawigacje a ze skrótami sobie mogą nie poradzić.

Kilka miejscowości w `destination` rozdziela się średnikiem bez dodatkowych spacji - tutaj nieraz rozdzielałeś przecinkiem i spacją.

Użyłeś też błędnego tagu `destination:forward:backward`, który został już poprawiony.

Literówki i rozdzielenia poprawiłem w [CS#183799311](https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183799311) ale przy kolejnych edycjach bądź bardziej uważny proszę i rozdzielaj multiwartości średnikiem bez spacji - to jest ogólna zasada w OSM.
rademalis (2026-06-12 19:31:03+00:00): Cześć
Dzięki za uwagi. Postaram się uważać na literówki. `destination:forward:backward`, to moja formatka którą nie poprawiłem.
osmmapper222 (2026-06-07 19:06:59+00:00): Hallo @brizgo,

danke für die Aktualisierung. 

In OSM wird der Präfix disused: genutzt, um auch für Programme kenntlich zu machen, dass eine Lokalität dauerhaft geschlossen hat. Beispiel:

disused:amenity=cafe

Den Präfix habe ich für den Dorfladen und das Café bereits ergänzt.

Viel Spaß beim weiteren Mappen wünscht
osmmapper222
brizgo (2026-06-07 20:04:12+00:00): Ahoi osmmapper222,
hey, cool, danke für die Korrektur, ich hatte (leider nur auf die Schnelle gesucht) keine bessere Lösung parat.

--
Glück auf
brizgo
Glassman (2026-06-06 23:18:33+00:00): #TIP: square bldgs by selecting the outline, then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183712522
aaronq227 (2026-06-25 18:01:51+00:00): Hello Srdjan023,

I noticed you've been updating ref tags on roads in Montenegro citing  the Official Gazette publication at https://www.sluzbenilist.me/propisi/394548 as a source for the route numbers.
Do you know if this source has a compatible license for use in OpenStreetMap? Since it is an official legal document rather than a road dataset, I was wondering whether the route designations listed there are generally considered acceptable for use in OSM. 

This would be helpful to know so our team and other contributors can cite it in future edits.
If you're aware of any prior community discussion, local guidance, or permission regarding the use of this source, I'd appreciate any information you can share.

Thank you!
Srdjan023 (2026-07-01 16:29:04+00:00): Hi, aaronq227

Laws and regulation are not protected by copyright (see Article 8 of The Law on copyright and related rights)

https://www.gov.me/en/article/copyright-and-related-rights-2
aaronq227 (2026-07-02 19:05:29+00:00): Thank you for the response and providing this article. Hope you have a nice day!
MassCartog (2026-06-06 13:46:14+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. If a feature exists on the ground and is tagged incorrectly, please update the tag rather then removing the feature. I've updated the feature type and access to match what exists on the ground.
svelich (2026-06-06 14:46:06+00:00): This doesn't exist at all, not even a dirt road. It was probably planned at some point as a street. This was perhaps a driveway to the only house with address as Klinger Lane. Even that house doesn't have access as the path is completely closed with overgrowth and logs. This house that has the driveway from N Oaks St.
jcnl44 (2026-06-06 01:16:43+00:00): Hello,
C'est une erreur l'ajout des tags contact:* sur le highway=pedestrian non ?
GilB (2026-06-06 13:02:59+00:00): Ouh là oui. J'ai rippé avec les raccourcis dans JOSM. Merci pour la vigilance !
GilB (2026-06-06 13:04:48+00:00): J'ai corrigé
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-06 06:15:11+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the name real?
MSH 060526 (1511811290), v2
Mark_in_Abq (2026-06-06 13:40:10+00:00): No, just an error.
Xvtn (2026-06-08 19:14:28+00:00): Hi Josh - Thanks for your contributions here! Looks great. In the future, can you write a changeset that describes (even very briefly) what you changed?
Mannivu (2026-06-05 21:30:07+00:00): Ciao, designated significa che è dedicato esclusivamente a quella forma di mezzo di trasporto (in questo caso motor_vehicle). Per indicare che solo alcuni mezzi a motore possono accedere va usato private oppure permit, se è necessario un permesso che è molto facile da ottenere.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183713595
FZS220 (2026-06-05 22:55:03+00:00): Ciao, grazie, ho corretto come indicato
FajrAl (2026-06-07 10:34:52+00:00): You don't need Chinese Garden as relation, you can add tags on its `way` https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/748701230
DerFussi (2026-06-07 12:13:15+00:00): The problem was it was not shown as a closed polygon on external maps. Just a line. I was not able to fill it with a color
DerFussi (2026-06-07 12:16:29+00:00): To me its still not clear, how OSM distinguishes a way between a polyline and a (closed) polygon. Both are "ways". In my job i work daily with geospatial databases but there the differenvce is clear. Anyhow, Wikivoyage/Wikidata has shown it as a polyline only.
DerFussi (2026-06-07 12:19:57+00:00): but nevertheless i do not understand why the greeb island area is not shown.
We can turn it bock to the old way, maybe it was just a missing tag on the way
FajrAl (2026-06-07 13:16:11+00:00): Closed way or polygon is when the first node of coordinates is the same of the last. You can spot this is in OSM raw file or Geojson. 
Node1, 1 1
Node2, 1 2
Node3, 2 3
Node4, 1 1

Polyline doesn't return the last node to the same as the first one.
DerFussi (2026-06-07 14:50:11+00:00): Sounds reasonable... So... i added the wikidata-id to the object and removed from the relation (which seems to be deleted now) Nevertheless i do not see the island/garden here at all
DerFussi (2026-06-07 15:06:13+00:00): everything is back to normal. i imported to JOSM but dont see any problem. .... the last thing i could do is, to import into my PostgrSQL database and check the geometry
DerFussi (2026-06-07 16:32:29+00:00): after looking around that the garden got lost as part of the lake. I added it as inner member. But still not visible
f_gonella (2026-06-05 20:14:30+00:00): Edit: *fosso
mueschel (2026-06-08 09:34:27+00:00): Hi,
this node has many tags that are not commonly used on hydrants or valves. Could you check the wiki for common tags and adapt the tagging?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13910418575
Anonymous897234 (2026-06-08 16:36:40+00:00): Take a look at this note for a picture of the valve/indicator. Feel free to change the tagging. As far as I know, there isn't yet suitable common tags for this item.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183713902
Anonymous897234 (2026-06-08 17:39:57+00:00): Forget to tag you... @mueschel
Anonymous897234 (2026-06-08 17:40:22+00:00): sp; Forgot.
mueschel (2026-06-08 18:00:38+00:00): I think you wanted to link here: https://streetcomplete.app/p/349059.jpg  (tagging users is not a thing in changeset comments)

"location=aboveground" doesn't exist, that should be "overground"

"valve:type" should be just "valve"

"valve:operational_status" - "operational_status" is a deprecated tag used to describe if something is in a working state but not for the default state of something

"fire_equipment" and "fire_infrastructure" are not used anywhere else. I don't know what information they add to the emergency tag
Anonymous897234 (2026-06-08 18:21:25+00:00): Yeah, meant to link to this note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5324092

For fire_equipment=valve & fire_infrastructure=valve, currently, beyond listing all possible values, there's not a way to distinguish all fire fighting related POIs (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Emergency_facilities_and_amenities#Firefighting). I think all firefighting equipment POIs should have a unifying tag like fire_equipment=. Possibly true for the other topics/groups in emergency=.

Also debatable in my tagging: emergency=fire_sprinkler_valve. I couldn't locate a value for this tag which was suitable, so I created the fire_sprinkler_valve value.
pwbriggs (2026-06-10 03:15:59+00:00): Are you sure this camera is manufactured by Flock, and not just a regular traffic camera?
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-06 06:13:30+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183715394
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-06 06:13:51+00:00): User has been blocked https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20770
Leo Slager (2026-06-07 00:08:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2026-06-07 00:12:49+00:00): Hallo Espresso478,

In OSM behoren snorfietsen en bromfietsen ook in de categorie motor_vehicle.
Deze kunnen wel gebruik maken van de track.
Dus moped=yes en mofa=yes heb ik toegevoegd.

Ook de paaltjes die de toegang versperren heb ik toegevoegd.

Veel plezier met verder mappen.
Bexhill-OSM (2026-06-06 02:26:10+00:00): Hi Edward,
Good to see some more details being added to Rosewood Park. Be careful with changing the alignment of the buildings and roads as Bing Maps has the wrong offset round here, best use Cadastral Parcels for better alignment.
Cheers,
Alex
Bexhill-OSM (2026-06-06 03:31:58+00:00): I've realigned things back as best as I can. I noticed there are few car parks and footpaths that are now going through private property, I suggest adding the access=private tag to those.
If you have any questions feel free to reach out.
Alex
edwardk_24 (2026-06-06 08:50:39+00:00): Hi Alex,
Thank you for letting me know about the alignment issues, I will make sure not to disturb the alignment in the future. I will also add the access=private tag where needed. Sorry for making these mistakes, I will make sure to contact you if I have any questions.
Thanks,
Edward
Bexhill-OSM (2026-06-06 16:22:34+00:00): No worries! Feel free to add detail. I've been meaning to map out the various leisure=fitness_station that are dotted around the wooded paths round there.
dentonny (2026-06-07 19:57:42+00:00): hey,
Ben je zeker dat richting Diestseweg ook terug open is? Wat ik volgens de nieuwsbrief van aquafin kon lezen, zijn hier nog werken aan de gang?
mvg
GR-menneke (2026-06-07 22:27:01+00:00): Hey hey,
Ik zag vrijdagavond geen bebording die een andere indicatie aangaf dan hoe ik het ingaf. Vanaf 08/06 wordt het stuk Gasthuisstraat tot Laar ook afgesloten en opgebroken.
Na de werken in de Gasthuisstraat beginnen weer werken in de Diestseweg en gaat deze op de schop.
Mvg
Joel Koen (2026-07-11 06:22:35+00:00): Hi, please don't remove sidewalk tags from footpaths that are sidewalks. When adding sidewalks, you need to properly create crossings too.
Joel Koen (2026-07-11 06:25:17+00:00): Also, your changeset comments could definitely be a little more descriptive. Including the date as your changeset comment is useless - say something like "added footpaths"
yelisey90 (2026-06-06 14:18:02+00:00): Hi, I have mostly reverted this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183740552
- there should not be same tagging on the building and on the amenity. Since, in this case, the institute includes other buildings, all relevant tags go the the larger polygon.
- the address do not need to include city & postcode. Both these values can be surmised from the fact that the building is located within Tbilisi ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1996871 ) and within postcode area (the one for 0186 is lacking, but should be created similarly to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20267195 )
yelisey90 (2026-06-06 14:19:25+00:00): Also note that email, website, facebook, telephone and similar tags by modern standards should be prefixed with contact: , like contact:email
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-07-07 06:26:06+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن عشوائية وغير صحيحة للخريطة
Amguid (2026-06-06 10:13:37+00:00): يا الحلوف ! علاش محيتو 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93313874