piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
habi (2025-10-29 12:19:55+00:00): Hey Michael
Ich hab' grad https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/telefonnummern-qa/137412 gemacht und bin ein paar falschen Nummern nachgegangen.
Du hast hier quasi "blind" korrigiert, die Telefonnummer ist nach einer kurzen Suchmaschinen-Suche nämlich an sich eine korrekte Mobiltelefonummer: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Zaimi+M%C3%BCnsterplatz+26+8200+Schaffhausen&t=osx&ia=web
So wie du diese korrigiert hast, ist komplett falsch :)

Magst du das noch richtig korrigieren?

Gruss aus Bern,
Habi
MichaelFS (2025-10-29 15:05:15+00:00): Hallo,

Danke, hatte die Nummer im www recherchiert. Inzwisvchen hat ein anderer User das auf "moblie" geändert. Falls noch etwas fehlt, gib mir bitte Bescheid..
bxl-forever (2025-10-30 01:30:25+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue.

Attention : les photos aériennes ne doivent pas être utilisées pour redessiner des maisons car elles montrent une image déformée de la réalité. Pour les bâtiments, uniquement les cartes numériques PICC, qui sont basées sur le cadastre officiel.
Warin61 (2025-10-31 05:51:43+00:00): Hi, 
Some issues in this area some from this changeset. 
In OSMInspector relation 5948947 (residential) the outer way is broken.
The one member relation (residential) doe not have the backyards going to the water front, yet the DCS Base Map shows their ownership of those area and imagery shows they do use that area as residential.
Relation 1319504 (Lake Macquarie) has a broken outer way .. 

Way Way: 845012863 (fence) crosses 2 roads but only one has a gate.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-12-01 22:24:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175378570 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some pre war Polish names; these do not belong in OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19062
plamen (2026-06-02 18:50:57+00:00): Мисля да го махна това Е871 от кръстовището на Цар Борис III с Южната дъга до Бургас. Там свършва маркировката на Гугъл. Табели последно има на ПВ Даскалово.
Dimitar155 (2026-06-02 19:11:14+00:00): По южната дъга на Околовръстното покрай Младост има табели за E871 (примерно при 42.6285417 23.4467138 на Bing Streetside в уеб редактора).

И моля те не ползвай Google Maps като източник, тъй като въобще не е надежден. Отделно е и несъвместим с лиценза на ОСМ.
plamen (2026-06-02 19:34:13+00:00): Май до Бургас е бил маркиран така: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=42.70594965212263&lng=23.518454551705418&z=18.804172290146546&pKey=137431621776421&focus=photo
plamen (2026-06-02 19:44:42+00:00): АИ: 
Ако някъде видите карта или текст, в които Е871 е отбелязан чак до Бургас, това е техническа и географска грешка, породена от грешното отъждествяване на целия национален път I-6 с европейския номер, който покрива само първата му третина. В документите на AGR такова изменение няма и Е871 завършва в София.
Dimitar155 (2026-06-02 20:14:17+00:00): Хм. Май наистина е бил съкратен доста.

E 871 Sofia - Kjustendil - Kumanovo 
https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2016/sc1/ECE-TRANS-SC1-2016-03-Rev1e.pdf стр. 18

На картата също е София - Кюстендил - Куманово - https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2025-12/MapAGR2007.pdf
plamen (2026-06-02 20:58:37+00:00): По-скоро някой на местно ниво го е продължил до Бургас.  Може и да не е умишлено. Може някой да се е объркал.
Dimitar155 (2026-06-02 21:09:00+00:00): Изглежда че е станало през далечната 2013-та година :)

changeset/15667779
plamen (2026-06-03 07:03:28+00:00): Мисля, че е добре да се изтрие в ОСМ. Документът в UNECE https://unece.org/transport/list-united-nations-transport-legal-instruments е от 2016, там не е до Бургас.
NeisBot (2025-10-29 11:46:32+00:00): Hi bilge525, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-10-29 11:46:33+00:00): Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added water basin with intermittent feature, named Kızıksuyu"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-12-01 22:24:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175378570 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some pre war Polish names; these do not belong in OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19062
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-10-29 20:59:54+00:00): This changeset connected a bridge to the road it crosses.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173925523
Marc Mongenet (2025-12-21 22:27:49+00:00): Ce changement a laissé les tags sur les lanes dans un état incohérent, je répare.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-12-01 22:24:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175378570 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some pre war Polish names; these do not belong in OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19062
geomaniX (2025-10-31 11:06:23+00:00): Moin!

Ich bin's nochmal :D
Ein kleiner Hinweis zum Restaurant De Deele. Öffnungszeiten - bzw. alle Werte insgesamt - verwenden ausschließlich englische Begriffe und folgen einer bestimmten Syntax (ohne Leerzeichen zwischen den Wochentagen und Wochentage getrennt durch Semikolon), siehe auch hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

Für die korrekte Erstellung von Öffnungszeiten kann ich nur "YoHours" empfehlen: https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

Auch Telefonnummern folgen einem bestimmten Schema (siehe hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone): Internationale Landesvorwahl Bereichsvorwahl Rufnummer. Hier wäre das bei De Deele dann "+49 2532 9593680"

VG
geomaniX
chrwel (2025-10-31 18:58:46+00:00): Habe ich korrigiert. Danke für die Tipp mit "YoHours". Ansonsten nutze ich auch noch die Android App "Every Door"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-12-01 22:24:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175378570 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some pre war Polish names; these do not belong in OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19062
aixbrick (2025-10-29 16:58:06+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
die Änderung des Straßennamens und der Hausnummer widersprechen der Umgebung und ALKIS (Maarfeld -> Marfeld, Nr. 40 doppelt) und habe ich daher rückgängig gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173939402
Gruß
Ansofter (2025-10-29 12:51:47+00:00): Angelegte Sackgassen wurden von mir falsch verwendet (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Inspector/Views/Routing).
Ansofter (2025-12-07 03:42:37+00:00): Falsch angelegte Sackgassen wurden in Changeset 175608359 wieder entfernt
infeeeee (2025-10-29 16:15:27+00:00): Hello! Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

If you can't speak Hungarian reply, and I will translate this to English.

Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

A kórház mint intézmény már szerepelt a térképen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220246101

Ezek pedig épületek, a building=* címkét nem szabad ilyenkor leszedni.

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség#Elérhetőségek

További jó térképezést!
infeeeee (2025-10-29 16:25:35+00:00): Javítva itt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173938040
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-12-01 22:24:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175378570 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some pre war Polish names; these do not belong in OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19062
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-12-01 22:24:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175378570 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some pre war Polish names; these do not belong in OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19062
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-12-01 22:24:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175378570 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some pre war Polish names; these do not belong in OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19062
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-12-01 22:24:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175378570 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some pre war Polish names; these do not belong in OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19062
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-12-01 22:24:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175378570 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some pre war Polish names; these do not belong in OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19062
Ansofter (2025-10-29 12:51:32+00:00): Angelegte Sackgassen wurden von mir falsch verwendet (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Inspector/Views/Routing). Entsprechend wurden ungerechtfertigte Sackgassen in #173928290 wieder entfernt.
felipeeugenio (2025-10-29 13:00:05+00:00): Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones. Por favor no borrar elementos solo porque están mal ubicados. Pueden trasladarse. Además la posta no es un hospital. Voy a corregirlo.

En todo caso muchas gracias por su tiempo y aportes.Estos errores son normales en quienes comienzan.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173927246
felipeeugenio (2025-10-29 13:03:56+00:00): Tres temas con esta edición:
1) escribimos con capitalización normal, no en mayúsculas. Además por favor cuidar la ortografía.
2) el tag building es para estructuras, no para el recinto completo.
3) ojo por favor con pegar recintos a las calles.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173927592
felipeeugenio (2025-10-29 13:04:07+00:00): Tres temas con esta edición:
1) escribimos con capitalización normal, no en mayúsculas. Además por favor cuidar la ortografía.
2) el tag building es para estructuras, no para el recinto completo.
3) ojo por favor con pegar recintos a las calles.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173927592
ENGELBERT MODO (2025-10-29 12:39:44+00:00): Good job MODO
eggie (2025-10-29 13:08:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback.. Je commentaar is Locatie Crevecoeur gecentreed . In werkelijkheid heb je de naam verwijderd?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=173928024
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
silversurfer83 (2025-10-29 20:40:07+00:00): Hi there :)

shouldn't this be a conditional access like

access:conditional=no @ delivery

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173928219
achauhan_Lyft (2025-10-31 03:01:33+00:00): Changeset: 173928219
Date: 30/10/25
Task
Comment from silversurfer83 about 13 hours ago 
Hi there :)
shouldn't this be a conditional access like
access:conditional=no @ delivery
cheers
---
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173928219

Response: Hi Silversurfer83!
My name is Amit, and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. We interpret the access:delivery=no tag as indicating that entry is prohibited for companies providing services to the public. According to osm wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Item:Q1028  this tag can be used where deliveries are not allowed. In this changeset, I added the access:delivery=no based on recent GPS data of vehicles and bing aerial imagery, which showed drivers didn’t pass through the gate just a week ago: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XDx5gGU2fIpWtu3a0dKsioMOi6Qp3hE6/view?usp=sharing . It looks like companies providing services are not allowed to enter in this area.
The screenshots will be available for a month. Please let me know if you are unable to view them within this timeframe – I could generate them once again.

Regards,
Amit
silversurfer83 (2025-10-31 20:21:44+00:00): Hello Amit,

thanks for the quick response.

The wiki item you linked leads to this article:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions

My understanding is, that this says what I said in my first comment above.

Regarding the aerial imagery: This looks like some kind of general road block. Please leave a fixme with the gate so people may resurvey it. 

cheers
TinPetreković (2025-10-29 12:58:39+00:00): The node was accidentally created and it was deleted in changeset 173928592 since it served no purpose

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173928592
bxl-forever (2025-10-30 01:27:34+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue.

Attention : les photos aériennes ne doivent pas être utilisées pour redessiner des maisons car elles montrent une image déformée de la réalité.  Pour les bâtiments, uniquement les cartes numériques PICC, qui sont basées sur le cadastre officiel.
Nous avons rectifié le changement.
csikth (2025-10-30 10:03:09+00:00): Bonjour, ayant une expérience personnelle des lieux pour y travailler, j'affirme que la délimitation entre le bâtiment numéro 7 et la bâtiment numéro 11 ne reflète pas la réalité
Dpenm001 (2025-10-31 15:11:21+00:00): I hope these changes are okay. I realise now they were way outside of the task area I was supposed to be mapping, sorry.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173928549
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-12-01 22:24:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175378570 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some pre war Polish names; these do not belong in OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19062
Frank Peng (2025-12-19 07:42:22+00:00): The alignment of the road you mapped (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445983866) is off from the actual alignment of the road seen in aerial imagery. The road curves going to the house, not going in a straight line. Please map and align roads going with the actual alignment of them seen on ground or aerial imagery.
fortera_au (2025-11-10 03:21:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174443403 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
alikiso (2025-10-29 13:13:45+00:00): Salam, "Bing Maps"-i referans aldığınızı gördüm. Daha iç küçələr və ya parklar üçün "Esri World Imagery" işlədə bilərsiniz, görüntüləri daha yeni və keyfiyyətlidir
Filip009 (2025-11-05 09:11:49+00:00): Are you sure, this road is under construction?
Frank Peng (2025-11-02 20:23:11+00:00): Is there a reason you tagged Way 845861056, formerly part of the Northlake suburb relation, as a primary road? I can see it overlapping the I-485 inner on-ramp at the West W T Harris Boulevard interchange, I-485, the I-485 Inner to I-77 ramp, Statesville Road (US 21), and Lakeview Road. I can also see the way crossing I-77 at the I-77/I-485 interchange. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/845861056

I checked the version history of the Northlake suburb relation and found that Way 845861056, which is what you tagged as a primary road, was part of the suburb relation, as seen in versions 1 and 2 of the suburb relation (Well, the way wasn't tagged as a primary road back then). https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12345455

I can also see that in changeset 173291613, you removed Way 845861056 from the Northlake suburb relation, as seen in FacilMap here: https://facilmap.org/#q=changeset%20173291613
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173291613
Frank Peng (2025-11-14 08:01:36+00:00): Just to follow up, what do you mean by this changeset's comment "connect features"? Were you trying to connect any features? If so, which ones were you trying to connect?
Frank Peng (2025-12-17 15:44:20+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174636140
Frank Peng (2025-12-17 15:55:52+00:00): Also, please don't glue roads to suburb or administrative boundaries. If a mapper adjusts the alignment of a road and it's connected to an administrative or suburb boundary, it would move the boundary along with the road, causing the boundary to be messed up or distorted.

Please don't just auto-accept the suggested fixes by the iD editor. You also added a crossing to where there isn't actually a crossing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13267041562
Frank Peng (2025-12-19 06:39:54+00:00): In this changeset, you glued several roads to a suburb boundary. Please don't glue roads to administrative or suburb boundaries.
Frank Peng (2026-01-21 01:16:32+00:00): Changeset reverted because it glued several roads to a suburb boundary line and added a non-existent crossing
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177500487
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173929308
SPalferro (2025-11-05 18:50:25+00:00): Hola, antes que nada, gracias por querer añadir información a OSM. Tuve que revertir los cambios que realizó, ya que utilizó como fuente de información a Google Maps, un servicio que no permite que sus datos sean utilizados por terceros. Además, Google Maps a veces puede mostrar información incorrecta o no basada en datos oficiales. Puede ver más información aquí: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Preguntas_frecuentes#.C2.BFY_por_qu.C3.A9_no_utilizo_Google_Maps_para_mis_datos.3F

Saludos.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174254905
Dawid2849 (2025-10-29 13:18:40+00:00): Cześć

historyczne nazwy dodajemy w znaczniku old_name:pl, nie w name:pl
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-12-01 22:24:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175378570 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some pre war Polish names; these do not belong in OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19062
gurglypipe (2025-11-01 11:28:13+00:00): Hi, I’ve undone these changes because they’re all over the place. Please split your changes into smaller, more self-contained ones; use more descriptive changeset descriptions (“improved clarity” is meaningless); and align the aerial imagery to the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels before starting editing.

If you have questions about any of that, please feel free to ask; the community is here to help :)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174057327
aharvey (2025-11-04 11:19:31+00:00): I'm not sure the reason to remove historic=memorial here? I've reverted the changeset to restore it for now.
aharvey (2025-11-04 11:00:54+00:00): not sure what was wrong with this, but I've reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174187322 based on the reasons given in the changeset description
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-29 19:52:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1085013157

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SPalferro (2025-11-05 18:50:26+00:00): Hola, antes que nada, gracias por querer añadir información a OSM. Tuve que revertir los cambios que realizó, ya que utilizó como fuente de información a Google Maps, un servicio que no permite que sus datos sean utilizados por terceros. Además, Google Maps a veces puede mostrar información incorrecta o no basada en datos oficiales. Puede ver más información aquí: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Preguntas_frecuentes#.C2.BFY_por_qu.C3.A9_no_utilizo_Google_Maps_para_mis_datos.3F

Saludos.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174254905
SafwatHalaby (2025-10-29 15:52:07+00:00): שלום! גם כאן הוספתם בניין שחופף עם הבניין הקיים: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445992754


צריך לתקן את הבניין הקיים ולתייג אותו כמרפאה מאשר להוסיף עליו עוד בניין חופף
gscscnd (2025-10-29 17:01:57+00:00): n?
AndyB_66 (2025-10-29 17:06:23+00:00): Robisz koszmarne literówki w nazwach (o ile są one w ogóle prawdziwe) - popraw, proszę.
Alliegaytor (2025-10-30 00:02:31+00:00): Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM.

In this changeset you added some building nodes to the SRL (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1003899336/history/31). I've since disconnected them in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173952611

Please refrain from connecting building nodes to the underground railway construction ways as they are not connected in any way.
geomaniX (2025-10-31 11:49:07+00:00): Moin!

Hier haben die beiden Wohnheime für Menschen mit Behinderung
(Wittekindshof https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13267096381 und
Kleine Oase https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13267096378) keine passenden Tags bekommen.

Werte sind bei OSM immer auf Englisch und darüber hinaus wäre hier der Key "social_facility" (siehe auch das "Haus Selmigerheide" von dir) passender.
Sollten die Werte von social_facility nicht komplett passen, bzw. mehrere in Frage kommen, kann man sie auch mit einem Semikolon trennen (z.B. social_facility=assisted_living;day_care, wenn einige Bewohner und Bewohnerinnen dort dauerhaft sind und andere nur tagsüber).

VG
geomaniX
chrwel (2025-10-31 18:54:55+00:00): Habe ich korrigiert. Danke für die Tipps
Lachgast (2025-10-30 14:59:57+00:00): Te gek! Leuk dat je dat toevoegt aan de kaart. Groet!
Gertjan Idema (2025-10-30 16:57:36+00:00): Dank je. Op zich niet nieuw. Voor zo'n 1000 routes in Nederland stond de kleur er al in. Nu met 1000 extra aangevuld en voor 215 routes gecorrigeerd. Bij de overige routes staat er nog geen kleur in de bron data.
TinPetreković (2025-10-29 14:01:38+00:00): According to the official source the road should be part of the National Netowrk, however the abundance of signs that state it is prohibited for trucks makes the National Network tags on that road incorrect #OptimoRoute
FS Patagonia (2025-11-19 04:35:22+00:00): Hola! Por favor, en tus próximos cambios evitá "arrastrar" nodos (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9756264478). Gracias!
iandees (2025-10-29 15:37:50+00:00): Did this building get destroyed or the address removed?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173931914
Wanderer2000 (2025-10-29 16:05:50+00:00): Hoi Taurus,

De school stond al correct gemapt op de outline (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1196884600). Door het punt toe te voegen krijg je twee objecten met amenity=school, terwijl er maar een school is. Ik heb je punt weer verwijderd.

Groetjes Wanderer
Taurus3 (2025-10-29 18:03:24+00:00): Hoi Wanderer,
Dank voor je check. Wat is de gangbare manier, polygoon of punt? Ik zie beide regelmatig. 
Groet,
Taurus3
Wanderer2000 (2025-10-29 18:21:20+00:00): Daar is (helaas) geen consensus over. Zie ook https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/taggen-van-scholen-in-nl-naar-aanleiding-van-nieuwe-tag/93211
Ookwel, een van beide kan. Zelf ben ik voor landuse=education op het vlak en amenity=school op de adresnode. Maar als ergens een school al gemapt is laat ik het zoals het is.
Spush (2025-10-30 16:42:22+00:00): Tisztelt szerkesztő!
Kérem, hogy amennyiben épületeket kíván felrajzolni, akkor a rétegek közül válassza a FÖMI felvételeket, mert az alapértelmezett Bing műhold felvételek el vannak csúszva a valós földrajzi koordinátáktól.
További jó szerkesztést kívánok!
Spush
hatul (2025-10-30 09:22:36+00:00): שלום, אם אתה מתכוון שהולכים שם אז צריך לסמן שביל.
SafwatHalaby (2025-10-30 15:51:11+00:00): אפשר לזחול שם. התלבטתי אם לסמן שביל ובסוף החלטתי לא לקחת אחריות על דברים כאלה
SafwatHalaby (2025-10-30 15:52:05+00:00): אני לא כל כך בטוח איך לסמן אחרת. מחשבות?
hatul (2025-10-30 15:58:11+00:00): לא יודע, או שזה שביל או שלא. אם אתה לא רוצה שביל אז תשאיר ככה.
goodidea (2025-11-02 16:28:26+00:00): Hallo!

Bei Änderung building=yes zu buiding=office doch bitte auch building:use=office entfernen (siehe Wiki – das sollte nur bei einer ANDEREN Nutzung als ursprünglich benutzt werden).

Also hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218604681

Ich ändere es gerade, weil es mir aufgefallen ist.

Bei anderen Gebäudetypen gilt das natürlich genauso (z.B. residential usw.) ...

Merci und Grüße!
Himké (2025-10-29 14:36:31+00:00): Use highway=corridor and indoor=yes for pedways within buildings; highway=footway and covered=yes for pedways outside buildings