piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2024-02-23 18:52:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147818131, 147828921 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
SomeoneElse (2024-05-05 08:57:29+00:00): Hello,
What was the source of the name added here?  It surely wasn't "Esri World Imagery"...

Best Regards,
Andy
SuezCanal (2024-05-07 10:23:37+00:00): Hi Andy. The street name was provided for us to add by a local Maps user. The name appears appropriate based on its use elsewhere in Iraq.
eggie (2024-02-13 16:24:17+00:00): Dan Ben. Dit lijkt me niet helemaal goed gegaan.
Alleen het voetpad onder het gebouw door kun je taggen met tunnel=building_passage De eindnodes maak je vast aan de gebouw omtrek. Het pad langs het water is geen tunnel.
access=no betekent Verboden Toegang. Hier mag dus niemand komen.
layer=-1  'moet' weg, want het pad loopt niet onder de grond.
Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-02-13 16:25:44+00:00): Haal je access=no ook weg. foot=yes hoeft  niet op een wandelpad.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-13 16:00:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11618945416

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-13 16:00:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11618945416

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
flohoff (2024-02-13 20:53:42+00:00): Moin,
weil ich gerade hier den changeset gesehen habe. 

Du hast "directions" auf die traffic_calmings gemacht. Das sehe ich das erstmal mal. Die wirken doch normalerweise in beide richtungen!??!

Flo
koastoas (2024-02-16 09:12:56+00:00): Wenn die Fahrbahn nur auf einer Seite verengt wird, dann betrifft das ja nur einen Fahrstreifen. 
Hab das auch bei Taginfo in Verwendung gesehen:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/traffic_calming%3Dchicane#combinations
gsilidis (2024-04-07 12:12:18+00:00): Hello and thank you for your contribution!

I've noticed that you've applied level_crossing tags for the following nodes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11618965593
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11618965594

There's no need to do this as the street goes above the railway (railway is for Tbilisi Metro, so it goes under the ground :) )
DanumValley (2024-04-10 10:05:34+00:00): Hello gsilidis, thank you for reaching out. I will make an update so the service road is not connected to the railway. Have a great day!
Colbertson (2024-02-13 16:08:07+00:00): tukums*
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-02-28 07:21:01+00:00): Обратите внимание, что правильно "Светлая улица", а не "улица Светлая". Как в названии улицы, так и в адресах зданий.
Sammyhawkrad (2024-02-18 13:01:34+00:00): Hello _jay_21211, this changeset has been reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147607606.

OpenStreetMap is a public good and not your personal property. Refrain from deleting data to suit your wishes. You can download the data and do whatever you want with it but removing data added by other volunteers is strongly discouraged.
HirschKauz (2024-03-11 13:01:41+00:00): Hi kiradonner  
Ich sehe gerade ein paar CS von Dir bei denen sich 2 Tags beißen: access=agricultural und motor_vehicle=no. Das bedeutet der Landwirt darf nur mit dem Fahrrad oder zu Fuß da hin ;-)  
Mehr Info hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access  
Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147416409
tekim (2024-04-23 20:10:17+00:00): Hello, Thanks for your edit to the map.  Unfortunately, when editing OpenStreetMap we are not allowed to use Waze due to its Terms of Service.
tekim (2024-04-23 20:10:46+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150414203
emersonveenstra (2024-02-15 12:08:06+00:00): Hi there,

Did you mean to make this entire way a ford? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13727526
MappingJunkie (2024-02-15 16:55:28+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. I am not sure how I checked that box!  Updated now.
eggie (2024-02-13 17:08:11+00:00): Oke.. Nu het stukje onder het gebouw.
Dat is highway=footway
tunnel=building_passage

Van het voetpad haal je de name=Naamloos weg, want nu heet het voetpad Naamloos en dat is niet de bedoeling. 
foot=designated en access=yes kan ook weg.
Dat is allemaal al ingebakken.
groet
eggie
eggie (2024-02-13 18:15:57+00:00): Dit waren je edits  Ik heb het aangepast.. tunnel=building_passage hoort op dat voetpad onder het gebouw door.
building=tunnel klopt niet... Daar zat ook een spelfout in.. dus het had geen effect.
Het gebouw is geen tunnel.

Kijk maar hoe ik het heb aangepast. Alle begin is moeilijk.
MVG
eggie


https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147417262
Even ctrl f5 voor het effect. 

MVG
eggie
jonrellim (2024-02-14 18:47:37+00:00): Heyy, hier snap ik het ff niet meer. Is die kledingzaak Confetti weg uit marktstraat 7? Volgens de website zit de optiek nog steeds op Oude Markt 7. En marktstraat 10 staat al een hele tijd leeg toch?

groeten,

jonrellim
jonrellim (2024-02-16 21:30:09+00:00): ik heb het ff gecorrigeerd: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147549643

groetjes!
Wanderer2000 (2024-02-19 11:44:33+00:00): Oeps je hebt gelijk ja. Toch verwarrend dat Marktstraat 7 en Oude Markt 7 zo dicht bij elkaar zitten ;p
Bedankt voor het corrigeren!
hatul (2024-05-06 20:14:25+00:00): תודה על התרומה.
אין צורך לכתוב בור מים לנקודה שהיא ממילא מסוג בור מים. השם מיועד למקרה שיש לבור שם ואם לא אז אין צורך למלא.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-02-14 02:35:32+00:00): 提示您：

有其他本地编辑者对您的编辑提出质疑

请尽快回应 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147378156 中的留言和讨论

如果您更习惯使用其他IM工具，您亦可查阅 https://t.me/osmchina/124459/124648 前后的关于应如何绘制梧桐山徒步旅行道路的讨论

（总的来说就是，很难判断是否存在的道路，基本就不要画，因为它们可能会误导其他山友，这是非常危险的；也会降低OSM的可信度。应以能实地复核为准）
Jrachi (2024-02-14 12:03:28+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto in OpenStreetMap!

Però devi fare attenzione agli avvisi che ti da iD (l'editor che hai usato).
Se tu avessi spostato in nodi non sarebbe stato un problema, ma (credo) hai tagliato e cancellato un tratto ed è saltata la sequenza della relazione del percorso a catasto 780.
Non ti preoccupare ho sistemato io.
La prossima volta fai più attenzione!
Ivo, Jrachi
Davide Brolit (2024-02-14 16:22:25+00:00): Ciao, grazie del benvenuto e della dritta!
È andata come hai detto tu, ho cancellato il tratto precedente ma ho dovuto prima svincolarlo dalla relazione col 780; in effetti credo di essermi semplicemente dimenticato di ripristinarla, perchè avevo fatto caso a questo dettaglio. In caso ricapitasse, basta aggiungerlo nella scheda "Relazioni" in fondo (lwn 780 in questo caso), corretto?
Davide Brolit (2024-02-14 16:24:36+00:00): (non è stato necessario tagliarlo perchè la parte dal ponte in giù era già separata, ma non credo faccia differenza)
Jrachi (2024-02-14 16:34:42+00:00): Usandi iD devi aggiungere in fondo, e rimane comunque in una lista non ordinata.
Almeno questo fino a poco tempo fa, iD è molto indietro sulle relazioni (Josm è molto, molto, meglio).
Può darsi che abbiano sistemato le cose, a volte trovo delle modifiche fatte sulle relazioni con iD che mettono in cima i guidepost (andrebbero in fondo, ma non è importante) mentre fino a qualche mese fa li metteva a casaccio.
NeisBot (2024-03-19 15:45:48+00:00): Hello Drim Daniel, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments \n
Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
rarad74 (2024-02-13 18:00:46+00:00): Salut. Te rog nu mai pune POI-urile asa de aproape de drum. Multumesc.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 12:10:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11619111584/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
aceman444 (2024-06-14 20:10:00+00:00): Ach, zase to forester's_lodge este aj s apostrofom? Teraz uz aj ranger_station, nevylucuje sa to (podla toho co forester's lodge vobec znamena)? A asi nie name=TANAP, skor to bude operator. A ten sa asi tiez vola trochu inak, mozno 'Sprava TANAPu' (ci plny nazov 'Správa Tatranského národného parku so sídlom v Tatranskej Lomnici'). K comu tie chatky sluzia? Naozaj je to ranger_station? To som dal akurat na centralu TANAPu v Tatranskej Lomnici.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-13 17:30:44+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Sierpecka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4133926809
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4133932218
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4133932262
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4133932273
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4133932313
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4133932322
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4133932329
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4133932331
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4133932340
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4133932347
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4133932349
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4133932469
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4133932716
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11619204022
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11619204023
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11619204024
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/880760922
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/880760923
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/880760924
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/880760926
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/880760927

"Majowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4133930626
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4133930827
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4133930834
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4133930855

"Agrestowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4133932366

"Pieńki":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4133932447
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4133932454

"Wesoła":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11619204013

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-02-13 23:28:27+00:00): Poprawione.
gscholz (2024-02-25 08:12:32+00:00): Hi JazminRgz,
your recent activities around Guadalajara have left behind a lot of  errors regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-103.35507&lat=20.62591&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147418988

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about how to edit cycleways properly, which are a part of a road:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dlane

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2024-02-29 06:39:33+00:00): Hi JazminRgz, 
these errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
eggie (2024-02-13 18:04:31+00:00): Dag Fear...

Lijkt me oke zo.. Wat er niet is kan gewoon weg..  Mocht iets een adres hebben dan wel het adres bewaren. Dat was hier niet het geval.
MVG
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 17:37:08+00:00): Hello!

You used
surface=niet-bestraat2
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1249987009/history

Have you maybe meant
surface=unpaved
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Frans S (2024-02-14 08:54:21+00:00): Hello Hannah2912,
Thanks for mapping here.
You mapped 2 buildings, a round and a rectangular one next to a road in the north.In fact, that is a culvert which allows the river to flow underneath the road. I corrected that.
Best regards
John-O (2024-02-14 07:14:28+00:00): The E1 route is now failing validation due to stops appearing after the ways. Is this something you are able to fix?
saintam1 (2024-02-14 08:01:00+00:00): Sure yes I’ll have a look. What validation tool are tool using?
John-O (2024-02-14 10:52:48+00:00): Geofabrik OSM Inspector

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=-3.27824&lat=55.94504&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-13 18:00:26+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1242584767

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
DD1GJ (2024-02-13 20:36:09+00:00): Was ist mit den Gästezimmern?
Jokkmokk (2024-02-13 20:47:07+00:00): Gibts auch nicht mehr.
Jokkmokk (2024-02-13 20:50:36+00:00): https://www.ampfinger-hof.de/
herman17 (2024-02-14 23:36:21+00:00): Вітаю! Чи дійсно на Михайлівській площі є нова огорожа в такому вигляді як ви нанесли? Якщо так, то мені здається, її варто було б якось краще позначити з урахуванням вже існуючої огорожі, щоб вони не перетиналися поверх одна одної, а були якось поєднані точками.
gscholz (2024-02-29 06:39:03+00:00): Hi JazminRgz,
your recent activities around Guadalajara have left behind a lot of errors regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-103.35507&lat=20.62591&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147420751

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about how to edit cycleways properly, which are a part of a road:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dlane

Kind regards
Guido
george1201 (2024-06-20 20:21:50+00:00): Hallo C_1965,
kann es sein, dass du die DHL-Packstation 125 (Ettlingen Bahnhof West) an eine falsche Stelle platziert hast? Ich habe sie hinter dem überdachten Fahrradparkplatz nördlich des Bahnhofsgebäude gesehen. Dort wo die Nummer 211 in der Karte eingetragen ist. Stehen dort hinten vielleicht zwei Stationen?
george1201 (2024-06-20 20:34:52+00:00): Oh, ich habe gerade das von mir gemachte Foto von Station 125 näher angesehen. Da klebt eine handschriftliche Notiz dran: "Packstation 211 befindet sich auf DB-Bahnsteig 1". Wo ist das? Hinter der Fahrradüberdachung steht jedenfalls die 125.
C_1965 (2024-06-20 21:31:12+00:00): Hallo george1201,
ich wra lange nicht mehr in Ettlingen West und erinnere mich nicht an Details. Möglicherweise habe ich da etwa übersehen. DHL hat dort wohl zwei Packstationen (125 u.211) laut ihrer Webseite. Feel free to correct. Danke!
george1201 (2024-06-21 07:08:19+00:00): Ok, dann verschiebe ich mal die Stationen so, wie ich es gesehen habe. Für die genaue Position der 211 muss ich nochmal vorbeischauen.
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-13 18:24:25+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 147393448, 147393573, 147393636, 147393661, 147393686, 147393706, 147393811, 147393877, 147393940, 147393997, 147394014, 147394048, 147394100, 147406413, 147407642, 147407707, 147407775, 147407867, 147408071, 147408102, 147408181, 147408340, 147413080, 147413128.
eggie (2024-02-13 20:19:43+00:00): Dag Assen.. Je vraagt feedback .. Lijkt me oke zo.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-02-13 20:20:52+00:00): Dag Assen... Je vraagt feedback. Niks mis mee zo.
MVG
eggie
Tombula (2024-02-14 13:18:51+00:00): Moin ostfriese1967, herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Ich sehe du bist schon fleißig am Bearbeiten der Karte und ich hoffe dir macht es Spaß! :)
Allerdings möchte ich dir hier einen Hinweis geben:
Du hast in diesem Changeset einen Fahrradweg, der unter der Autobahnbrücke verläuft, entfernt.
Den Weg gibt es aber aktuell noch und ich vermute du hast dich da vertan. 
Falls du Hilfe beim Zurücknehmen deiner Änderung benötigst, kommentier hier gerne oder schreibe mir eine Nachricht. 
Grüße
Tombula
Tombula (2024-02-17 20:12:10+00:00): Moin ostfriese1967, 
du hast dich leider noch nicht bei mir zurückgemeldet. Deswegen habe ich deinen Änderungssatz rückgängig gemacht (147586173). Meld dich gerne bei Fragen.
Grüße
Tombula
SekeRob (2024-02-24 09:35:38+00:00): Buongiorno Piergiorgio.

This object https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1249999472 reports a self intersection in the OSM Inspector validation
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=7.64226&lat=45.10780&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

We've been discussing on the community forum what the meaning is of tags like height 76, layer 75.5 + min_height=0. Layers is a tag made for identifying if one object is higher or lower than another object, for instance a bridge is at layer=1 over ground.

Could you please fix the self intersection and give an understanding of this layer=75.5?

Many thanks and have a good day.

Rob

PS The Musical bridge in Rome has the multiple selfintersections reported in OSM Inspector. Please check and correct.

thx
mavl (2024-02-14 13:31:11+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, зачем вы указываете слово "село" в теге "addr:city=село Киева"?
denis-ch26 (2024-02-14 14:03:15+00:00): Здравствуйте. Это вид сельского населенного пункта ( село, хутор, деревня, аул, кишлак и т.д.), учитывая одноименность некоторых нас. пунктов, посчитал это допустимым.  Если это не допустимо при разметке, впредь так не делаю.
denis-ch26 (2024-02-14 14:23:22+00:00): Ошибку исправил. Слово "село" убрано. Спасибо за замечание.
mavl (2024-02-14 14:57:56+00:00): Вид сельского поселения указывают в "official_status=ru:село" на точке населённого пункта.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/415860453  
  
Это село называется Киёва.
denis-ch26 (2024-02-18 18:53:46+00:00): Отредактировал на Киёва
olo81 (2024-02-16 14:00:35+00:00): wycofane, nazwa i sam kamieniołom jest już naniesiony, nie powielamy obiektów już istniejących
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-02-29 06:28:29+00:00): Hello Udo,

Here you have deleted a way instead of modifying it. By doing so, you have deleted a lot of information. That is not good. Please edit objects if possible and do not replace them with new objects with less information.

I will restore the old way. Then you can do the edit again without deleting.

Best regards
Roger Wilco
olo81 (2024-02-16 14:01:10+00:00): wycofane, nazwa dodana do nieczynnego kamieniołomu
KorraSato (2024-02-13 18:41:20+00:00): Mistake in the description, no shrine and just a single cross added.
gscholz (2024-02-25 08:13:04+00:00): 

Hi JazminRgz,
your recent activities around Guadalajara have left behind a lot of errors regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-103.35507&lat=20.62591&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147421856

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about how to edit cycleways properly, which are a part of a road:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dlane

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2024-02-29 06:41:55+00:00): Hi JazminRgz,
these errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-14 10:15:42+00:00): Hi,

may we know the reason behind deleting more than 2,000 buildings, which have been mapped or imported by a different contributor?

Thanks!
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-14 10:16:28+00:00): partly revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142928513
s_SoNick (2024-02-19 05:23:44+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
AngocA (2024-07-07 02:52:23+00:00): Hello Ce Ja. Qué pasó aquí?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1250023976/history#map=17/4.51343/-68.45926
Un río mapeaste aquí parcialmente, y par meses después lo mapeaste todo.
AngocA (2024-07-07 03:33:55+00:00): Si quieres usar una capa oficial de ríos de Colombia, puedes usar esta capa que está hospedad en osm.lat (en mi casa), que es una copia de la oficial, pero la oficial es muy lenta.

wms:http://geoserver.osm.lat/geoserver/Colombia_IGAC_workspace/ows?LAYERS=IGAC Rios y quebradas layer
mapeadora (2024-07-07 04:56:50+00:00): Hola, es incompleto y luego completado porque uso un gestor de tareas (DAMN), entonces progreso poco a poco (objetivo siendo mapear todo lo que encuentro no enfocado solo a ríos). No sé si usar una capa oficial dado que muchas veces hay desplazamiento y no corresponde con lo que se ve. Es impreciso vaya. Está bien aportar elementos poco a poco o causa problema con las reglas comunitarias nacionales?
literan (2024-02-24 11:40:23+00:00): откуда взялись будки оплаты проезда по платной дороге внутри станции МЦД? ваши выдумки не знают границ
RFuser11 (2024-02-24 20:05:48+00:00): ваши комментарии как всегда бесподобны))) о каких будках речь, можете уточнить?
literan (2024-02-25 11:56:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1250025700/history
RFuser11 (2024-02-26 18:28:32+00:00): да, ок, почитал подробнее описание тега. Согласен с избыточностью данной линии. Пы.Сы. Жду ваших новых перлов к правкам.
literan (2024-02-26 19:41:01+00:00): думаю, следующие "перлы" вы увидите уже от лица сотрудников DWG
eggie (2024-02-14 07:24:42+00:00): Dag cmx   Dat kan..., maar het adres bestaat vast nog wel. Dat heb je nu verwijderd. Ik zal het herstellen.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147423730

MVG
eggie
cmx45 (2024-02-14 10:38:10+00:00): Hoi Eggie, Ik was al een beetje bang voor dat er zoiets zou gebeuren. Daarom had ik die controle aangezet. Dank je wel dat je dit opgepakt hebt. 
Als ik het dan goed begrijp dan blijft de locatie wel staan, maar heb je alleen de meldingen van de Rhedense pioniers uit die locatie weggehaald ?
eggie (2024-02-14 11:02:53+00:00): Yep.. precies..
Groet..
eggie
MrMoehritz (2024-02-18 14:44:49+00:00): Hallo elvt, willkommen bei OSM. Schöner erster Edit!