piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2025-11-30 19:22:15+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!,

On this changeset you've used a "source=Google Maps" tag.  We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source.
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK.  If not, we'll have to undo this change.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
Miui Cat (2025-12-01 10:27:40+00:00): how do I change it
SomeoneElse (2025-12-01 22:50:57+00:00): You can't change the changeset source tag, but you can explain in a bit more detail what sources you used to make the edit and how you used them.
adiatmad (2025-12-02 07:01:29+00:00): @Miui Cat 
If you’d like, you’re welcome to join the OSM Indonesia Telegram. There, you can share or discuss anything related to OSM with other local enthusiasts.

(https://t.me/osmindonesia)
AndyB_66 (2025-12-23 21:42:11+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
gFido (2025-12-23 23:15:06+00:00): Przeczytane, zrozumiane, postaram się poprawić :)
rohieb (2025-11-17 22:52:37+00:00): Die Koordinaten des Grenzpunktes X sind im Durchführungsabkommen [2] in Artikel 1 definiert. Die beiden zusätzlichen Grenzpunkte westlich und östlich von X sind im Cuxhaven-Vertrag [1] definiert als:
"Die Breite des Anschlusses beim Punkt X in Küstenlängsrichtung beträgt 200 m."
und im Durchführungsabkommen Artikel 1 als:
"(2) Der Punkt X liegt in der Mitte der 200 m langen, in Küstenlängsrichtung verlaufenden Grenzlinie, die den Anschluß der Exklave an das Festland bildet."
Diese beiden zusätzlichen Grenzpunkte wurden durch die Messfunktion in JOSM aufgrund der Küstenlinie auf dem Esri-Luftbildes ermittelt.

[1]: Staatsvertrag zwischen der Freien und Hansestadt Hamburg und dem Land Niedersachsen vom 26. Mai/4. Juni 1961 (hamburgisches Gesetz vom 3. Oktober 1961, HmbGVBl. Seite 317, niedersächsisches Gesetz vom 27. September 1962, Nds. GVBl. Seite 150)

[2]: Durchführungsabkommen zu Artikel 2 Absatz 1 und Artikel 5 Absatz 3 des Staatsvertrages zwischen der Freien und Hansestadt Hamburg und dem Land Niedersachsen vom 26. Mai/ 4. Juni 1961 (Cuxhaven-Vertrag), Nds. GVBl. 1969 Seite 147, https://voris.wolterskluwer-online.de/browse/source/csh-da-filter%21a52e918e-8a02-41f8-8b62-1c4b6a92ff6a--WKDE_LTR_0000003520%231a17f0c4d199300db0c29c087ecd3693
rohieb (2025-11-17 22:54:08+00:00): fehlende URL zu [1]: https://www.landesrecht-hamburg.de/bsha/document/jlr-NeuOCuxNDStVtrGHArahmen bzw. https://voris.wolterskluwer-online.de/browse/source/csh-da-filter%21a52e918e-8a02-41f8-8b62-1c4b6a92ff6a--WKDE_LTR_0000003520%236ec2281df2ec32f0bfbe986fc8f99c57
Matt McCutchen (2025-11-17 23:11:26+00:00): The Mapillary photo shows a turn restriction without the "except buses"; I assume that was added after the photo was taken.  I was still able to use Mapillary to confirm everything else about the turn restriction.
impiaaa (2025-11-18 19:34:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing! Please note that copying from Google Maps, including Google Streetview, is illegal. The built-in web editor iD has a number of permissible options for street-level imagery, including Bing Streetside and Mapillary, in the "imagery" panel on the right side.
Another OSM User (2025-11-18 19:40:44+00:00): what are you talking about?!  i am posting the location of a flock safety ALPR camera.  Nothing here is copied.
impiaaa (2025-11-19 14:36:01+00:00): Your changeset comment mentions "streetview," which is part of Google Maps.
Another OSM User (2025-11-19 20:07:19+00:00): I drive by this camera every week day

what more do you want from me?
impiaaa (2025-11-20 00:28:03+00:00): Thanks for confirming you didn't use Streetview! When saving a changeset, you can specify how you got the information in the "sources" field. "Local knowledge" would be the one you would want in this case. Specifying your sources like this will help avoid confusion in the future.
CloCkWeRX (2025-11-18 07:46:48+00:00): Ah nice. Would it be helpful to have more building footprints in this area?
mothbelly (2025-11-19 11:30:05+00:00): Thanks :) it might not be worthwhile though. From memory it was mostly residental, with just a few shops nearby (crash repair, barber). I'll have a better look next time I'm down that way.
wielandb (2025-11-23 23:45:15+00:00): Hi KnuFloh!
Du hast bei einigen Objekten aus highway=bus_stop highway=stop gemacht. Das ist nicht so ganz korrekt, weil highway=stop ein Stoppschild meint. :D

Das ist mir aufgefallen, weil ich gerade eine MR-Challenge bearbeite, wo man die Richtung von Stoppschildern angeben kann, und mein Algorithmus war ziemlich verwirrt. :D

Wenn ichs durch zufall noch woanders sehe, korrigiere ich's, aber vielleicht willst du auch nochmal durch deine CSs gucken. :3

Viele Grüße
Wieland
KnuFloh001 (2025-11-24 19:04:08+00:00): Danke Wieland für den Hinweis.
Ich schau nochmal durch meine CSs und passe es an. VG.
Senihtu (2025-11-19 06:44:11+00:00): !!!Achtung Geisterfahrer auf der Verbindungsschleife von der B252 auf die B62!!!  (-:

2 Busrelationen
akino_germany (2025-11-19 11:40:48+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Habe beide Relationen verlegt und eine neu sortiert. Bei der anderen lässt mich relatify nicht speichern.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-11-18 00:51:53+00:00): Hello, why did you relabel some taxiways as Yellow and/or Green? I couldn't find any source for that on the ground.
NTTrailsLSE (2026-02-13 13:09:53+00:00): Hi, thanks for your comment and suggestion to avoid including car parks in walking route relations. This is something we are actively reviewing as part of a QA on National Trust trails in OSM. It is likely that moving forwards, we will be removing these features from the route relations for ease of use in routing engines.

NT GIS Trails Team.
ramthelinefeed (2026-02-13 13:47:11+00:00): Well you also shouldn't be tagging to please AI routing engines either ;)
Danysan95 (2025-11-19 20:46:01+00:00): 1. Perché hai eliminato gli elementi disused:shop=* e deisused:amenity=* e shop=vacant ? (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7042592734 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7044823711 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10936944559 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13294955116 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13294955117 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13294955120 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13294955125 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13294955126 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13294955127 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13294955129) OSM permette di mappare tutto quello che è verificabile sul posto. In più questi elementi sono utili per tracciare l'uso dei vari negozi nel tempo, in fase di rilevamento sul posto come punto di riferimento, e per chissà quanti altri scopi che non possiamo immaginare al momento. Come ti ha già detto il DWG in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16394 non puoi eliminare elementi e tag solo perché non interessano a te. Questi elementi vanno ripristinati.
2. L'elemento luggage_locker https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13294955130 stava a rappresentare il fatto che il suo operator, il vicino negozio Sir Nolo City, offre anche il servizio di custodia bagagli. Possiamo pensare modi più efficienti di rappresentarlo direttamente sull'attività (purtroppo non conosco tag standard per farlo), ma la tua soluzione di semplicemente eliminare l'elemento senza trasferire l'informazione non è valida. Bisogna ripristinare in qualche modo questa informazione.
3. Sei sicuro della modifica a https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6199350642 ? Il 9 novembre avevo confermato il suo brand mentre c'ero davanti di persona, così come tutte le modifiche in quel changeset. In meno di 10 giorni ha cambiato completamente brand? Non è che volevi aggiungerlo di fianco di questo elemento all'incrocio con via Gargallo?
Master PoPo (2025-11-19 19:09:11+00:00): two cameras on same pole, other camera faces towards school entrance
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-18 03:58:53+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18971
felipeeugenio (2025-11-18 14:43:04+00:00): Hola. ¿Son varias decenas de miles de nodos vacíos?
Taya_S (2025-11-18 17:05:49+00:00): All empty nodes have been deleted in changesets: 174824251, 174824248, 174824243, 174824238, 174824231, 174824227, 174824225, 174824224

Please also see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18975
NeisBot (2025-11-18 13:14:01+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
- https://osm.org/way/802365361 | crossings=13

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174799483
pitscheplatsch (2025-11-18 13:24:09+00:00): Have been corrected by osm.org/changeset/174802269
NeisBot (2025-11-18 13:14:02+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
- https://osm.org/way/802365361 | crossings=13

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174799498
pitscheplatsch (2025-11-18 13:24:36+00:00): Have been corrected by osm.org/changeset/174802269
user_5359 (2025-11-18 07:56:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the two nodes https://www.osm.org/node/726763109 , https://www.osm.org/node/12802278689 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the nodes back to the original position.
CAM-Gerlach (2025-11-18 23:03:54+00:00): Given the spammy changeset comment, the lack of any intentional valid content to upload and the blatantly damaging nature of the change, it appears this may have been intentional (or at the very least severely misguided), and may need further escalation. But first, Nicomarvin, would you care to explain what motivated this change?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174799506
Kovoschiz (2025-11-18 08:33:26+00:00): These are not villages, but rural areas. The actual villages are Au Tau, and Ta Ku Ling San Tsuen.
kingkingHK (2025-11-18 10:10:13+00:00): So.... `=locality`? Tbh it would be nice if there's a guide on the (HK-specific) definitions of different `place=`s.
Kovoschiz (2025-11-18 10:47:43+00:00): `=locality` is for unspecified, uninhabited, and non-addressing locations. Ta Kwu Ling is obviously used to refer to the estates commonly.
nullroute (2025-11-19 06:19:56+00:00): Hi Melissa69420,

I have been reviewing your edits to OpenStreetMap. I see you have added some Flock Safety automated license plate reader cameras.

The locations where you have added the cameras to the map seem to not be correct.

Could you verify you added the cameras to the location where you intended?

Thanks,
nullroute
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-29 01:20:34+00:00): DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175259904
user_5359 (2025-11-18 07:47:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database.
Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes.
OddlyAngled (2026-01-11 19:55:43+00:00): the north side has a name on TNM now, I added it here too
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174800647
julcnx (2025-11-19 05:09:21+00:00): Thanks a lot for your contributions! Just a friendly tip: try to keep your changes smaller, like focusing on one country at a time. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
wolfy1339 (2025-11-18 15:19:40+00:00): The government data is licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 which isn't compatible with osm, you need a waiver; of which there are none for any Quebec ministry.

See https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/acceptation-du-mode-dattribution-dopenstreetmap-par-le-gouvernement-du-quebec/127403/15
Pierre-Felix Breton (2025-11-18 16:42:46+00:00): Yes this is correct for the CCBYSA but this dataset is different : its CCBY which allows me to remix it and repurpose it- which is what I did.  I took the csv data and cleaned it, formatted it and sanitized it.
wolfy1339 (2025-11-18 16:47:07+00:00): All CC licenses are not compatible with osm, as described at https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/
Pierre-Felix Breton (2025-11-18 17:02:57+00:00): Yes ok thanks for the clarification. I will revert the changes
trigpoint (2025-11-21 12:32:30+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted in 174821762 usage of CC-BY 4.0 without waiver and redacted by the DWG
NeisBot (2025-11-18 04:24:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-18 04:24:41+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Business consulting office"
NeisReview (2025-11-19 09:18:14+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174805363
NeisBot (2025-11-18 13:14:19+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly.

In total, I detected 59 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
- https://osm.org/way/1263371087 | crossings=30
- https://osm.org/way/845013701 | crossings=29

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174801205
pitscheplatsch (2025-11-23 14:26:06+00:00): Has been corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174897769
trigpoint (2025-11-21 12:32:31+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted in 174821762 usage of CC-BY 4.0 without waiver and redacted by the DWG
Glassman (2025-11-18 21:53:16+00:00): Can you redraw this house? The outline should match the roof line.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174801947
NeisBot (2025-11-18 13:14:30+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
- https://osm.org/way/149512651 | crossings=6
- https://osm.org/way/794248044 | crossings=6

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174802662
NeisRevert (2025-11-23 14:24:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175028364
where the comment is: "Revert of unintended geometry change"
fortera_au (2025-11-18 22:21:46+00:00): I would probably also change those from highway=track to highway=service. They don't really look like tracks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174804039
Sam Cate (2025-11-19 06:22:01+00:00): Hi there, changed it to service road with gravel as surface
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174804039
mos_next_door (2025-11-19 11:11:59+00:00): I hate 'hw=service' for park alleys with a passion as it contradicts every part of 'service road' definition in the wiki, but there is probably no better option. Sigh.
DodoGTA (2025-11-18 10:19:52+00:00): Ar landuse=basin pakeitimas į natural=water yra kad tik užtildyti iD įspėjimus (ar tiesiog vandens telkinio/kūno tipo negalima tiksliai nustatyti arba tiesiog kita priežastis)?
Tomas Straupis (2025-11-18 10:56:05+00:00): iD įspėjimai nelabai kam įdomūs, nes jo įspėjimų didžioji dalis yra nesąmonės ir čia vienas pagrindinių (bet ne vienintelis) trūkumų. natural=water yra viena klasė objektų (kurie nelabai mąstančių žmonių buvo suplakti į vieną bendrą, vietoje to, kas anksčiau tvarkingai buvo atskiri) - landuse=basin - visiškai kita, su skirtingu naudojimu, skirtingomis topologijos taisyklėmis, skirtinga kartografija ir pan. Aprašyta wikyje.
impiaaa (2025-11-18 19:32:30+00:00): When a business has moved out, it's better to just remove the tags that are no longer applicable, instead of deleting the node entirely, so that useful information like the address doesn't have to be re-added. The web editor iD has a shortcut called "downgrade" that does that automatically.
Josef73 (2026-01-11 15:05:45+00:00): Hallo, gibt es schon Infos zum Lidl und deren Öffungszeiten?
NeisBot (2025-11-18 07:36:43+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Plastic surgeon in Beverly Hills California"
NeisBot (2025-11-18 07:36:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-11-19 09:17:51+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174824443
NeisBot (2025-11-18 08:36:25+00:00): Hi JosTheFarmer, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #NoComment
NeisBot (2025-11-18 08:36:25+00:00): Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Adjusted node geometry"
JosTheFarmer (2025-11-18 09:57:56+00:00): Wing hotel was rebranded to Koko hotel
mcliquid (2025-11-18 12:52:59+00:00): Hallo, du hast hier angegeben, dass die Bushaltestelle taktiles Pflaster hat. Wie kommst du darauf? Hier sind einige Beispiele zu finden: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodenleitsystem
Fabian007 (2025-11-20 19:03:48+00:00): Hallo mcliquid,

Oh sorry, Tippfehler von mir gewsen!!

Wie kann ich das in der App rückgängig machen, oder kannst du es bitte damit machen, bitte??

Danke, und einen schönen Donnerstag Abend, wünsche ich dir noch!!

Mit Freundlichen Grüßen Fabian007
mcliquid (2025-11-18 12:21:55+00:00): Hallo, bist du dir ganz sicher, dass der Backshop wirklich Halal und Kosher anbieten kann? Dafür braucht es doch sichtbare Zertifikate, dass das verwendete Fleisch Kosher bzw. Halal ist. Beides gleichzeitig ist zudem äußerst selten. Woher hast du die Info, dass Kosher und Halal angeboten wird?
Fabian007 (2025-11-20 19:18:58+00:00): Hallo mcliquid,

Danke, für die Rückantwort!!

Was sind eigendlich Halal und Kosher??

Denn ich glaube, auch da habe ich leider falsch eingetragen.

Wie kann ich auch diese Änderung Rückgängig machen, oder kannst du es für mich machen, bitte??

Danke, und einen schönen Donnerstag Abend, wünsche ich dir noch!!

Mit Freundlichen Grüssen Fabian007
mcliquid (2025-11-23 09:13:17+00:00): Wieso beantwortest du Fragen, die du nicht mal verstehst?
Fabian007 (2025-12-06 13:45:36+00:00): Hallo mcliquid,

Vielen Dank für deine Nachricht und sorry das ich erst zu spät bei dir melde und sorry, das ist diese Frage antworte, obwohl ich es nicht verstehe!!

Ich bin darauf ausgegangen, daß bei der Frage das Brot bedeutet und habe einfach auf "Ja" getippt was leider nicht stimmen konnte, nachdem ich nachgegangelt habe.

Und wie kann ich diese Antwort wieder Rückgängig machen, oder könntest du es wieder Rückgängig machen, bitte??

Aber Danke, für deine Info!!

Ich wünsche dir einen schönen Samstag Mittag noch!!

Mit Freundlichen Grüßen Fabian007
Fabian007 (2025-12-06 13:49:24+00:00): Hallo mcliquid,

Vielen Dank für deine Nachricht und sorry das ich erst zu spät bei dir melde und sorry, das ist diese Frage antworte, obwohl ich es nicht verstehe!!

Ich bin darauf ausgegangen, daß bei der Frage das Brot bedeutet und habe einfach auf "Ja" getippt was leider nicht stimmen konnte, nachdem ich nachgegoogelt habe.

Und wie kann ich diese Antwort wieder Rückgängig machen, oder könntest du es wieder Rückgängig machen, bitte??

Aber Danke, für deine Info!!

Und auch Sorry, das ich vorhin Rechtschreibfehler hatte und das ich nochmal zurückschreibe!!

Ich wünsche dir einen schönen Samstag Mittag noch!!

Mit Freundlichen Grüßen Fabian007
literan (2025-11-18 20:12:59+00:00): получился мультиполигон без тегов https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19852078

что хотели этим сказать?
literan (2025-11-18 20:14:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1451569491 а здесь незамкнутая линия с тегами микрорайона.

нет, это правка под откат. Подучитесь.
NasuFoito (2025-11-21 10:11:20+00:00): Здравствуйте, извините, что не ответила, подумала, что исправить сразу будет лучше.
Спасибо за замечания
CAM-Gerlach (2025-11-18 23:05:45+00:00): Thanks for the quick revert of the damage!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174805694
CAM-Gerlach (2025-11-18 23:07:25+00:00): I'll keep monitoring the user and report to DWG if necessary if there's no response after a reasonable amount of time or they do further damage in the meantime.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174805694
NeisBot (2025-11-18 08:33:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-18 08:33:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Trekking and adventure travel company in Kathmandu Nepal"
NeisReview (2025-11-19 09:17:14+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174849520
Syl (2025-11-18 13:33:26+00:00): Bonjour, il y avait déjà deux bacs pour les déchets alimentaires un peu plus loin : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11675998201 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11675997995
Il y en a maintenant un troisième ?
roubaf (2025-11-18 14:31:17+00:00): Ah mince il faut que je retourne voir. Je m'en occupe.
Syl (2026-01-04 16:51:18+00:00): Je viens de vérifier et de corriger, il s'agit bien d'un container à verre ici.
roubaf (2026-01-04 17:00:06+00:00): Ah oui merci j'avais complètement oublié. Et puis en dessous de -10 je ne cartographie plus :-)
Syl (2025-11-18 13:57:14+00:00): Bonjour, l'endroit où vous avez ajouté cette activité ne correspond pas, ça semble être une maison plutôt qu'une usine ici.

De plus, seul "Provélis" devrait figurer dans le nom, le reste aurait plutôt sa place comme description.

Et enfin, l'attribut"craft=metal_construction" n'est pas adapté. "craft=sun_protection" correspond mieux.