piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
yawfle (2024-01-09 02:43:38+00:00): Based on experience, my working assumption is that with the current well-defined, solidly gated termination of the bikeway, they consider everything beyond that point a no-bike zone. If you actually talk to some horse people and they say otherwise, well... it's your call. Being something of a realist about human behavior, I personally feel like it makes sense to align the tagging with the big, obvious physical obstacle rather than a more nebulous "I don't see any signs yet" approach. :P

But yeah, I doubt there's any danger of construction starting any time soon.
whb (2023-07-29 09:20:32+00:00): Offenbar falsche Zuordnung.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=935121347547834&focus=photo
zeigt nicht den Weg auf der Insel:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/115652789/history
whb (2023-07-29 09:25:54+00:00): Ebenfalls falsch:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=541487077589035&focus=photo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25768554/history

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=278457708206665&focus=photo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498601481/history
whb (2023-07-29 09:32:04+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=522714355771358&focus=photo
zeigt nicht den bearbeiteten Weg:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25017040/history
Branko Kokanovic (2023-07-29 09:34:41+00:00): Uh, sorry, I was thinking this is about highway when I was solving pic4review! Thanks and good catch, I will not touch pic4review more. There were couple more stuff I (probably) wrongly edited. 
---
Äh, tut mir leid, ich dachte, es geht um die Autobahn, als ich pic4review gelöst habe! Danke und guter Fang, ich werde pic4review nicht mehr anfassen. Es gab noch ein paar weitere Sachen, die ich (wahrscheinlich) falsch bearbeitet habe.
eggie (2023-07-29 12:41:19+00:00): Dag Karel..   Er staat toch al een parkeerplaats ingetekend hier als vlak.. Dan hoef je niet nogmaals een node teo te voegen. Ik heb je parkeerplaats verwijderd.
Evt kun je wel die customertag overzetten op het vlak als je door een slagboom moet.

MVG
eggie
hrhino (2023-07-30 14:31:32+00:00): Looks good generally but *please* square your buildings (Q key)... I'm sure most of these don't have weird angled walls. Thanks!!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139152222
5m4u9 (2023-07-29 03:43:46+00:00): Hi, in this changeset the sections of road between bridges (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1039508587) aren't bridge, these are walls with foundations.

more detail in this image of components of bridge (see back wall/wing wall/foundation)...
5m4u9 (2023-07-29 03:44:02+00:00): https://civildigital.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/components-of-bridge-800x398.png
GbabethemapGod (2023-07-31 15:28:58+00:00): Hello 5m4u9,

Thank you for reaching out to me. I understand that you are technically right about those sections not being a bridge. However, I made the changes to keep consistency and to prevent bridges ending at junctions like in this example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2441014234. According to the wiki this is how bridges should be mapped https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge#bridge-yes. Instead of splitting up the bridge into sections the wiki recommends drawing in a polygon with all the necessary information attached to it to represent those embankments https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbridge. Please let me know if you have any further questions.

Thanks,

GbabethemapGod
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-03 07:11:40+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193026930/history has fence_type = hedge that was added in this edit
Would barrier=hedge be better tagging here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier=hedge
user_5359 (2023-07-30 10:05:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/node/11074156203. What is the mean of the tags
Rules =No glass allowed!
craft type=Canoes, tubes and Kayaks
?
oba510 (2023-07-29 07:28:23+00:00): This looks like an unpaved road built mainly as an access route for service vehicles to access the water tank. Generally, either highway=service or highway=track would be appropriate here.

I can't find any evidence that horses are even allowed on UCSF's Mt Sutro property. Can you please provide some evidence that this is actually a bridleway, (or a path, or a tree row, or a footway..)?
oba510 (2023-07-29 07:06:26+00:00): This Parade Ground?  https://www.nps.gov/places/000/alcatraz-parade-ground.htm

Sorry, but which branch of the military is using this decaying concrete surface in a National Park that's described as "...an excellent spot for a selfie...", "...host[ing] annual sunrise ceremonies which celebrate Native American culture..." and "...the trailhead for the Alcatraz Agave Trail and is open when the birds are not nesting..."?
oba510 (2023-07-29 07:31:51+00:00): There are steps and a wheelchair ramp...  IIrc there's normally also access through the indoor food court.
rarad74 (2023-07-29 20:49:01+00:00): Salut. Numele la strazi se pun cu Strada in fata numelui. Exemplu; Strada Tunari. Te rog citeste documentatia wiki despre folosirea denumirilor in Romania si nu mai pune nume de strazi ca intr-o agenda personala.
tyfi (2023-07-28 21:24:49+00:00): This looks like an editing mistake where someone forgot to deselect a node when merging? Hard to say
user_5359 (2023-07-29 08:10:42+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/node/6855836992. You add a lot of foreign keys! What is the mean of this?
Please remove the unnecessary information (e.g. coordinates, reference number of at least two sources) translate the possibly interesting ones (opening_hours, phone:operator) and correct the spelling of the values. Alternatively delete the imported data garbage.
tykayn (2023-07-29 08:31:00+00:00): yup, that was a test i will fix that. thanks for noticing
maricn (2023-07-28 21:42:50+00:00): This was a mistake, should be discarded. Another entry already exists, I updated that one.
NieWnen (2023-07-29 10:22:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193031863
Landuse'y na siebie nachodzą.
unyny (2023-08-18 12:58:59+00:00): Możesz przestać pisać do mnie z każdą niedopatrzoną pierdołą? Potem moderacja czepia się, że nie odpisuję na komentarze. Jeśli zauważysz jakiś błąd w moich zmianach to go po prostu popraw.
danieldegroot2 (2023-07-28 21:55:57+00:00): See also
- https://www.tidytowns.ie/u_reports/2015/2015%20County%20Cork_South%20Kilbrittain%20136.pdf
ajulien (2026-05-15 11:23:04+00:00): Bonjour lunafoxxx. Il est vrai qu'il y avait ici un garagiste qui a fermé depuis un moment, et ce n'est maintenant plus qu'une friche. Votre édition date de trois ans, et je ne vois toujours pas le moindre signe de la possible construction d'un Basic Fit (je passe régulièrement par cet endroit). Avez-vous plus d'information ? D'où aviez-vous obtenu l'information à l’époque ? Merci d’avance.
lunafoxxx (2026-05-15 12:18:24+00:00): En effet, le lien que j’avais ajouté dans les notes n’a aucun sens. La page de FranceCadastre semble avoir été modifiée, elle mentionne Créteil dans le titre, mais fait référence à Montbazens ?! La page n’est pas disponible sur la Wayback Machine. À l’époque où j’étais passé sur place, le panneau du permis de construire était bien affiché et indiquait Basic Fit comme futur commerce.

La seule information concernant Basic Fit que j’ai trouvée aujourd’hui est disponible ici :
https://www.veilleco.com/permis-de-construire/details/785503/09402819c1009-extension-commerces-665-m2-creteil

Je pense que le nom "Basic Fit" peux être retiré de la zone, et que la zone de construction pourrait être modifiée en landuse=brownfield ?
ajulien (2026-05-16 23:43:08+00:00): Ah oui, j'avais raté la note ! Il y a du effectivement y avoir le projet d'en faire un, mais abandonné ? Je n'ai pas remarqué de permis de construire sur place (enlevé ?), je regarderai plus en détail la prochaine fois que j'y passe.

Je pense qu'on peut effectivement enlever le nom et le marquer en friche, ça semble complètement abandonné (juste des hautes herbes, pas de trace d'engin de construction, ni de construction tout court) depuis qu'ils ont enlevé le garage. Je vous laisse vous en charger ?

Je passe devant régulièrement, si je vois que les choses changent, je pourrais toujours faire la mise à jour.
lunafoxxx (2026-05-19 11:06:25+00:00): Je suis tout à fait d'accord, j'ai effectué la modification :) (passage en brownfield + suppression du nom)
ajulien (2026-05-19 12:00:36+00:00): Merci !
BlueButterfly (2023-07-31 23:43:23+00:00): Correction: Source used was Bing aerial imagery
tyfi (2023-07-28 22:16:22+00:00): I verified all north/south roles in the relation.
tyfi (2023-07-30 06:24:21+00:00): This only affected Missouri.
NieWnen (2023-07-29 10:20:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046218759
Zostało proposed w tagach
danieldegroot2 (2023-07-28 22:39:26+00:00): See also
- https://www.tidytowns.ie/u_reports/2011/2011_Limerick_Ardpatrick_441.pdf
- https://www.tidytowns.ie/u_reports/2013/2013%20County%20Limerick%20Ardpatrick%20441.pdf
- https://www.tidytowns.ie/u_reports/2018/limerick/2018-County-Limerick-Ardpatrick-441.pdf
NieWnen (2023-07-28 23:11:31+00:00): Dzięki! 

Drobna uwaga do węzła `highway=crossing`, warto dorzucać na przejazdach rowerowych/pieszo-rowerowych `bicycle=yes`.
nic wielkiego w sumie, a część aplikacji może potraktować inaczej. 

Natomiast jeśli drogi są rozdzielone, a pomiędzy nimi jest wysepka to nie dajemy wtedy `crossing:island=yes`

Chodzi w tym o to, żeby ten węzeł bywał realnie w miejscu wysepki – czyli wtedy jak droga nie jest rozdzielona. Co do linii (jako przejście/przejazd) nie jest to formalnie ustalone i pewnie można stosować :P

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:island
Tutaj to jest ładnie wytłumaczone.

A tak to ogólnie bardzo ładnie :)
Robert Wysocki (2023-07-28 23:38:53+00:00): Dzięki za uwagi, naniosłem poprawki. 
Z `bicycle=yes` nie sądziłem, że to może mieć znaczenie, natomiast `crossing:island=yes` wydawało mi się bez sensu, ale tak było wcześniej więc postanowiłem zaufać poprzedniemu edytorowi :)
LockOnGuy (2023-07-29 12:09:08+00:00): Hello ڕاستی, Please don't change names of ways in Nineveh Governorate from Arabic to Kurdish as Nineveh Governorate an Arabic speaking governorate, and it's not part of the kurdish region.    
I will revert the name changes inside Nineveh Governorate.    
Please 
Regards.
bxl-forever (2023-07-31 20:17:22+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for this.

I think there might be a little bit of an issue with the following POI:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11074286639

operator	wikidata=Q87990220
is a very strange value.

I suppose you mean this:
brand:wikidata	Q87990220

If you do this, apps will be able to correctly associate this shop with the parent company.

Happy mapping.
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-18 15:10:05+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139156261
user_3716049 (2023-12-02 17:57:15+00:00): Hi Capt TeeJay, 
da die allermeisten Hausnummer (ca. 90%) in MG einzeln u. nicht am Gebäude eingetragen sind  u. ich daran Arbeite die Quote noch zu steigern, wäre ich dir Dankbar wenn du dies ebenfalls tuen könntest.
Die vDOP Bilder sind jetzt übrigens genau so aktuell wie die von Bing aber deutlich besser.

Gruß Kelso
5m4u9 (2023-07-29 03:55:08+00:00): Hola, gracias por construir.

Solo recomendar, que lo mejor es desabreviar Av. / c. / psje. y otros a Avenida/Calle/Pasaje/Boulevard porque no todos saben que representa.
canfe (2023-10-20 15:55:17+00:00): Come mai dai dei nomi alle strade che sono dei DUG e non i loro nomi veri?
Regione Malone
Case Tenqua
Case Tenqua
Ti è già stato detto per i Changeset
137582383 da Musuruane
122884893 da canfe
e che in genere non rispondi alle  osservazioni fatte da vari utenti.
Pertanto di chiedo di rispondere a me e a tutti gli altri altrimenti segnalerò la tua attività al DWG dopo 10 giorni.
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4795149
Fedurli (2023-10-22 03:19:44+00:00): Quali sono i nomi veri delle strade da te indicate? Le abitazioni rispondono a tale indirizzo e la cartellonistica riporta tale nome
canfe (2023-10-22 05:31:19+00:00): La cartellonistica dice che quella zona si chiama "regione" non che quella via si chiama regione.
Lo si dovrebbe anche notare dai civici che non seguono la solita regola pari e dispari su lati opposti.
Pertanto anche eventuali indirizzi dovranno essere addr:place e non addr:street
Qui le definizioni ufficiali:
https://registry.geodati.gov.it/dug
Jrachi (2024-01-02 09:17:22+00:00): ref=SP22c1
Da dove arriva?
Jrachi (2024-01-05 10:28:43+00:00): Aspettando ancora risposte da te.
Mi sono accorto che in questo changeset hai creato alcune way che sono duplicati completi o in parte di way esistenti.
È questo problema ha causato una quantità di correzioni una sopra l'altra complicando sempre di più la manutenzione dei dati; forse è stato l'uso di iD su un territorio così vasto che ha causato il problema.
Sulle relazioni ha causato i maggiori danni e lo abbiamo visto solo due giorni fa, mentre ora stiamo trovando le duplicazioni di strade meno importanti.
Ti consiglio di verificare tutte le way che hai creato in modo da ripartire da una situazione più serena.

Ivo
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-09 09:09:38+00:00): Hello! What kind of remains are left by https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193053146 in a terrain?

Note that completely gone railways are not mappable in OSM
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-09 09:17:08+00:00): In general, on which sections https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16138649 railway track has traces still visible in terrain? What kind of them?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-08 19:24:27+00:00): Again, is any part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16138649 maps something that is currently existing and has traces of it?

Or is it mapping fully gone tracks, not mappable in OpenStreetMap?
জাবির (2023-07-29 22:47:19+00:00): Hi,
You have broken the multipolygon relationship building (complex shaped building), deleted the older created building and created again. Try to keep the older buldings and edit the shape. And be careful if it is part of a [relation](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation)
tastrax (2023-07-29 05:31:16+00:00): Hi Jamang1999 - you appear to be using some custom imagery that we dont have permission to use. Can you confirm if a waiver has been signed for use of this imagery? If not, we will need to revert all the changes in your most recent changesets.
jamang1999 (2023-07-29 06:42:33+00:00): Hi Tastrax, Looks like you're right. Will start reverting my changes. Thanks!
tastrax (2023-07-29 06:59:46+00:00): Many thanks - if you have contacts in SA then please feel free to see if you can get a waiver for the imagery. Its worth a try every couple of years just in case they have a change of heart. Contact me via my profile if you would like some guidance.
Kovoschiz (2023-07-29 06:12:49+00:00): Please don't delete and redraw poorly. I have already set up the entire structure here.
Kovoschiz (2023-07-29 09:32:03+00:00): 2. Please don't put descriptor labels in `name=` . Use proper features and attributes, with `description:*=` only if needed. 
3. Please don't use `crossing:markings=yes` for look left/right markings. They are defined as `crossing:markings=no`.
JJIglesias (2023-07-30 20:48:56+00:00): En el Comentario del Changeset NO se coloca PERSONALIZANDO EL LUGAR. El mapa NO se PERSONALIZA, se actualiza, se modifica o se edita. No hay "Personalizacion" en un mapa publico y abierto. 
Por Favor sigue los lineamientos del Mensaje que se te envio a tu Inbox y de:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios

Saludos y Gracias
MILTON CUNAY SARABIA (2023-07-30 21:01:07+00:00): Muchas gracias por su comentario
Glassman (2023-07-30 20:22:29+00:00): According to https://www.airnav.com/airport/95WA black diamond airport is still in operation. Can you review this edit? I'll send you more info on OSM in DM
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139157767
jptolosa (2023-07-29 03:59:04+00:00): ¿Cuál es el motivo para crear insistentemente estas restricciones de no virar en U sobre sí mismas en cada esquina?
Kovoschiz (2023-07-29 06:15:47+00:00): Please don't delete and redraw poorly. You missed many things.
Kovoschiz (2023-07-29 06:17:36+00:00):  2. Please stop changing `crossing=traffic_signals` to `crossing=uncontrolled` + `crossing:markings=yes`. This is an iD problem.
alexey_zakharenkov (2023-08-02 07:49:59+00:00): Добрый день!
"Продукты", "Пресса", "Ремонт одежды" - это не собственные имена торговых точек, а просто вывески. Не надо заносить их в названия. Имена более уникальны: "Продукты от Палыча", "Жёлтые страницы" или "Напёрсток".
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-08 06:31:12+00:00): Thanks for mapping missing houses! In general many are still missing across world.
체크이스트 (2023-07-29 04:17:12+00:00): 호텔컨셉의 포남동 신상 카페입니다. 오래 된 운수회사 건물을 카페로 리뉴얼했어요
Kovoschiz (2023-07-29 06:27:44+00:00): Please don't use the project title directly. `name=` is the proper name only.
Kovoschiz (2023-07-31 13:25:28+00:00): 2. There is no `construction=sidewalk` . Only `construction=footway` ,  `footway=sidewalk` , `construction:highway=footway` , `construction:footway=sidewalk` , etc.
tyfi (2023-07-29 04:19:27+00:00): Also fixed a TIGER error on nearby YY.
tyfi (2023-07-29 04:50:47+00:00): Regarding the concurrency, it does not span the two counties. It is entirely within Harrison County, but Route M is a long east-west route that spans the two.
Kovoschiz (2023-07-29 06:26:31+00:00): Please don't remove the address.
rickmastfan67 (2023-11-12 04:33:41+00:00): Out of curiosity, when was VA-80 rerouted from going to the KY line and KY-80?
Joseph R P (2023-11-12 04:59:56+00:00): Hello, I'm not sure when exactly it was rerouted (maybe within the past year?), but it can be confirmed that it follows this new route here: https://www.virginiaroads.org/datasets/VDOT::lrs-route-master/explore?location=37.287111%2C-82.284677%2C14.28
user_18365999 (2023-07-29 06:55:30+00:00): Thank you for contribution on OSM
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139159073
user_17222985 (2023-07-29 05:22:55+00:00): https://t.me/DecolonizationUkraine/7721
TFI71 (2023-07-30 07:24:01+00:00): I can cornfirm that this path is not very accessible from my own experiance. The surface is definitive not compacted. But the path is there. Therefore I propose to change the properties to

surface = ground
tracktype = grade5 (unimproved track lacking hard materials, uncompacted, with surface of soil/sand/grass)
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-29 06:16:30+00:00): When mapping areas, please don't have them partially overlap, like you have done for the fairways and the greens.  They should either be attached to each other (and not overlap or one should be fully within the other.
Z_Empty (2023-11-28 09:38:22+00:00): 您好，看到您把沪昆高速娄底至洞口段娄底部分路段设为Lanes=3，是否是把应急车道算进去了？若是考虑到扩容工程，目前扩容工程尚未动工，请在未来扩容工程完工后再行修改。
meongseolin (2024-10-23 03:15:12+00:00): 应该是的，出车道应该怎么标数
mueschel (2023-08-01 16:32:00+00:00): Hi,
could you explain what these nodes represent? They have tags like "radaition" which are not used in any other place in OSM.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-07 05:22:29+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145978810
wireguy (2023-07-29 10:08:44+00:00): Hi Other Guy, welcome to OSM.  The entire church is not at layer=1.  If it was just a roof, then adding a layer tag makes sense.  I changed just the portion of the road that intersects the church with the tag covered=yes.   -wg   see change: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139166591
muralito (2023-07-29 17:37:40+00:00): Hola. Los giros en U en Uruguay estan prohibidos en TODAS las esquinas, haya o no cartel, por la ley de transito. asi que no hace falta ni es conveniente mapearlos, sino que es una es una configuracion para los ruteadores.
griffonboi (2023-07-29 07:32:04+00:00): Hi we edited this area at the same time, I made some fixes since there were a few conflicts after closing my own changeset 139161590. Just cleaned up duplicates after that, if you're happy with how it is now then don't worry
Fizzie-DWG (2023-07-29 07:34:04+00:00): Not a prob! Thanks!
empty_child (2023-07-29 11:02:13+00:00): Thanks. I tried to contact the person who made it, but forgot to revert
yusufmert (2023-07-29 11:35:29+00:00): No problem, I think he didn't want to vandalize the map anyway
Zakronia (2023-07-29 07:06:40+00:00): I meant "abbreviated" instead of "unabbreviated" in the changelog note
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-30 10:52:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249944046/history has shop = smoke that was added in this edit
Is it the same as shop=headshop - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dheadshop ? Or the same as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dsmartshop ?

Or maybe it sells e-cigarettes and is shop=e-cigarette ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3De-cigarette )?

Or maybe shop=tobacco is the best fit ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtobacco )?

Or is it a separate shop category that should be documented as valid?
Glassman (2023-07-29 15:28:32+00:00): Why did you remove the hole ways? These are legitimate features for golf courses? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139161490
wireguy (2023-08-06 12:00:50+00:00): Danno722, the boundary of
relation 10816406
is broken.   And what does the comment iojhio mean?  Not helpful.
drkt (2023-07-29 10:57:48+00:00): Hvorfor har du tilføget "Horsens Centrum" til navnet? Dette er ikke information jeg kan finde på stedet.
drkt (2023-07-29 23:51:28+00:00): Jeg har snakket med OSM World by Discord og de siger at det ikke nødvendigvis er forkert og jeg kan se at det er sådan der er tagget rundt om i resten af landet. 

Bare ignorer min tidligere besked.
Hungerburg (2023-08-16 21:49:02+00:00): Hallo MappingAnt, zweispurig ist bei der Zufahrt zum LKH Natters eindeutig falsch, meiner Ansicht nach. Man kann dort nicht ungebremst aneinander vorbei fahren.

Interessant, weil das für die Klinik Konsequenzen hat, ähnlinch wie in Hochzirl…
TaraV (2023-07-31 13:16:14+00:00): Hi, I've noticed you've been editing relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6556221 but I've seen you've made so that ways (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175306831 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175306830) are outer parts within residential polygon (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/251837046) that is marked as inner. Just wanted to ask whether these neighborhood ways were left as outer on purpose, so that they belong to the district, but the populated place as whole does not?
Thanks, Tara
Glassman (2023-07-29 15:29:45+00:00): Again why remove the multipolygons?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139163061
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-30 10:35:34+00:00): Valimbavala avait déja ajouté cela ? Il faut éviter les noms que en majuscule ...
hrhino (2023-07-30 14:26:46+00:00): Are you sure those are streams/rivers? They look a lot more like ponds/lakes (natural=water and water=lake) to me...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139163418