piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
literan (2025-05-06 20:42:33+00:00): здесь тоже bicycle=no лишний
literan (2025-05-06 20:41:39+00:00): bicycle=no это юридический запрет проезда на велике (например, знак стоит). К покрытию это отношения не имеет
Entbert (2025-07-18 12:04:34+00:00): Hi Maris33, why did you delete the 6173 Zemgale-Daugavpils bus service (relation 16018186)?
Maris33 (2025-07-21 19:28:27+00:00): Hi, it's my mistake, i accidentally deleted it, i'm sorry
Entbert (2025-07-22 12:09:46+00:00): Could you in that case please restore the concerned relations? Thanks!
Entbert (2025-07-24 09:24:22+00:00): Thank you!
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-07 06:04:37+00:00): Hello.

You added a "note" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12815421942

Notes are only seen by other mappers. I think this better suits "description", which can be seen by users using the map.
yrtimiD (2025-05-07 13:41:36+00:00): Hi, you also added strange round building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1384151277 I'd like to know what kind of building is this? I don't see anything similar on street view maps.
Eliya Levin (2025-05-12 08:19:26+00:00): The building added is a small permanent exhibition building, that consists of a roof and an audio presentation in the garden of the Hansen house.
Thanks for the notes
VictorIE (2025-05-18 12:39:15+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1382669074
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1384151646

Double-mapped fence.
danieldegroot2 (2025-05-19 19:26:52+00:00): Done. Oversight from drawing the full fence.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166493309
(if it had more detail would've merged the other one to keep history)

Regards,

Daniel
Joseph R P (2025-05-11 01:33:50+00:00): I don't believe primary is the best classification for roadways leading to a supermarket. The roads themselves aren't significant on their own merits, as they link no major population centers, transportation hubs, or other highways as the tag is intended to represent. A rural Walmart itself can be regionally significant, but only in its own niche as a private business that just so happens to be located along that road, and not like a typical primary road destination such as a town or an airport is.
SD Mapman (2025-05-13 21:38:23+00:00): I mean as far as traffic counts go (observationally, don't have actual numbers), the busiest roads in Spearfish are the business loop (North/Main/Colorado), Jackson Blvd, and the 27th/1st spur to Walmart. I guess that's what I was subconsciously basing that off of originally. As someone who grew up in the area (and has run on the non-existent shoulders #badidea), I would argue that 1st Ave, at least until the first entrance, qualifies as a "major road in an urban area".
SD Mapman (2025-05-13 21:40:09+00:00): I worked in this area in high school, and the traffic was some of the worst for miles around (they need to redo 1st completely)
Joseph R P (2025-05-14 00:16:02+00:00): Generally roads like these will have disproportionately higher traffic just as long as there is something like a major supermarket or truck stop along it (especially adjacent to highways in rural areas), though functionally the roads remain the same, particularly since this is just one property driving up the traffic vs. a large transportation facility such as an airport or seaport.

An example of this I've noticed is the road leading up to the Buc-ee's in Florence, SC. Based on AADT alone, it could probably be a tertiary or secondary road, but it is functionally a dead-end street that has a bustling travel center located along it.

I think something like a Walmart could be a great case for bumping a road up from residential/unclassified to tertiary, granted it's not just a short little stub or dead-end road of some sort, but primary usually indicates the road is a more trans-regional highway like 14A or a major arterial like the business loop.
jcarlson (2025-05-08 16:17:07+00:00): in some cases, the amenity=school tag is on the area corresponding to the school grounds, and is not needed on the point.

i don't like mapping schools inconsistently like this, but it's good enough for now. maybe eventually we swap the amenity areas for `landuse=education`, but i think this is okay to leave as is.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165911711
vasony (2025-05-10 14:23:56+00:00): Szia! Lebontották az épületet is vagy csak bezárt? Tamás
Egge Gege (2025-05-16 18:01:46+00:00): Szia!
Bezárt évekkel ezelőtt.
Gergő
vasony (2025-05-16 20:19:39+00:00): Szia! 
Az épület amiben működött megvan még vagy már nincs?
T
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-07 03:46:35+00:00): Wielkie dzięki za zmapowanie tego!
Tatfahren (2025-05-07 14:37:30+00:00): ?
Kiesgenießer (2025-06-06 13:03:30+00:00): Hallo Tatfahren,

was ist denn dein Problem mit diesem changeset?
Tatfahren (2025-06-06 13:58:23+00:00): Das war glaube ich ein Folgekommentar da du auf meinem ersten Kommentar ne Weile nicht geantwortet hattest, und wieder nur "additions" geschrieben hast.
silversurfer83 (2025-05-07 18:57:11+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Danke, dass du hilfst unsere Datenbank aktuell zu halten.

Du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand deine Änderung ansieht. Hier mein Feedback:

Grundsätzlich schon ganz gut :)

Feinheiten: Wenn du Neubauten einzeichnest, dann guck bitte, ob du die Adresse des gelöschten Gebäudes gebrauchen kannst. In NRW kannst du das ALKIS als Hintergrund nutzen und dort die Adressen entnehmen.

Ansonsten kann ich dir nur empfehlen, dich ein wenig unter wiki.osm.org umzusehen und bei Fragen guckst du unter c.osm.org

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165912175
Glassman (2025-05-07 18:11:47+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165912507
felipeeugenio (2025-05-07 12:46:58+00:00): Hola. por favor no desplazar caminos. La foto que estás viendo es circunstancial. Hay más proveedores de fotos y todos tienen algún desplazamiento. Incluso hay desplazamientos entre capas del mismo proveedor. Y cuando las renuevan hay desplazamientos con respecto de las fotos antiguas. La única manera de saber con algún grado de certeza es usando tras strava. Para eso por favor unirse al chat de la comunidad en Telegram en el link que hay en mi perfil.

Lo que va a pasar con estas ediciones es que otro mapero puede desplazarlas otra vez y ninguno de los dos va a tener muchos argumentos para decir que está en lo correcto.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165912577
felipeeugenio (2025-05-07 12:48:53+00:00): De hecho, viendo las trazas strava, las calles estaban bien dibujadas. A veces está mejor aliniado Esri que Bing en Chile.

Voy a reversar el changeset.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165912577
Glassman (2025-05-07 18:12:10+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165912913
jimkats (2025-08-15 22:51:43+00:00): Hi, may I ask why you changed the northern start of the road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1012915150 ? You turned it into a curve while that's not what's on ground. And you mention as source for the whole changeset streetlevel imagery, assuming of Mapillary, while there's no Mapillary coverage in that area, so based on what data you made that change?
jimkats (2025-08-15 22:57:18+00:00): And I just spotted that you removed the turn on the junction https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/37.674118/22.719373 even though there are markings on the asphalt the denote where this turn is.
ViewStreet (2025-08-16 08:28:40+00:00): 
Community said:

ManuelB701
Manuel B.
24 Ιουν
I’ll also note that this also depends on how large the curve is. Where the curves are fairly small, you generally draw only one line but where they become bigger, you rather want to draw separate ways.

In conclusion:
1st There is not such physical object but only paint
2nd The curve is too small.
Please consider to restore the changes you have made.
tjhorner (2025-05-10 21:31:10+00:00): Is this supposed to be a bridge area? It does not have any tags
silversurfer83 (2025-05-07 19:05:58+00:00): Thanks for coming back to those :)

happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165913553
citrula (2025-05-07 03:15:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. Have you verified this yourself, or are you going off of the web listing alone?
mquizhpi (2025-05-07 20:10:37+00:00): Yes and you can look at this street view from google maps: https://www.google.com/maps/@29.781679,-95.5581242,3a,37.5y,280.95h,83.75t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sd2o3tlr_ldAVDGuZikcNpQ!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D6.251004205784739%26panoid%3Dd2o3tlr_ldAVDGuZikcNpQ%26yaw%3D280.95252712773396!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDUwMy4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
citrula (2025-05-09 20:01:48+00:00): Google maps is sadly not allowed to be used to contribute to OSM. If you know this from visiting in person, that's sufficient.
Hypsometric (2025-05-15 16:23:40+00:00): Hello. Thanks for all of your edits. I was cleaning up some mapping errors where tree nodes were also mapped with an area. Tree nodes are for individual trees while the area tagged with natural=wood is for forest.

I just cleaned up a bunch of data and noticed some of your recent edits were in the changeset. I thought I'd let you know to save you some work in your editing. I see you have a lot of notes in this area. Keep it up! :-)
lunar_jaws812 (2025-05-15 21:58:15+00:00): Thanks for the encouragement and knowledge! I'm new to editing OSM and have mostly been surveying via StreetComplete. I didn't realize that all the natural=wood areas here were incorrect, but now I know!
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:58:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:55:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
cubbe8 (2025-05-07 00:16:47+00:00): You deleted the floating bus stop.
Glassman (2025-05-07 18:13:01+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165914558
pwbriggs (2025-05-07 04:44:42+00:00): Thanks for the contribution. Can you update this to use the phone number format in the official wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage? Thanks again, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
oscarlewis (2025-05-07 05:10:21+00:00): Will do shortly! Thank you!
oscarlewis (2025-05-07 06:14:05+00:00): Updated both this phone number and the Antique Sandwich Shop phone number to reflect the format as recommended in the wiki.
Lezurex (2025-05-07 12:50:42+00:00): Warum access=customers auf den Ladestationen? Laut Website ist die Ladestation für alle Marken zugänglich.

socket:tesla_supercharger würde ich übrigens nicht mehr verwenden, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Deprecate_socket:tesla_supercharger_and_socket:tesla_destination

Die Website-URLs führen übrigens zu einem 404. Der hier funktioniert: https://www.tesla.com/findus?location=Dietikon-SelfServeDemoDrive
stillhart (2025-05-10 15:53:30+00:00): Habe den vorhandenen Charger nur gesplittet und die einzelnen Punkte aufgeteilt. Aber ich muss da sowieso noch einmal über die Bücher. Anscheinend sollte man da das Areal als Charger oder so mappen und dann die einzelnen Charger als Stationen.
user_5359 (2025-05-07 10:10:09+00:00): Hello! Please be careful! You move same crossing nodes over the map. I move four nodes back to the original position (see https://www.osm.org/changeset/165930837). Please check the other crossings!
b-jazz (2025-05-08 14:09:45+00:00): Hello Patrick

Please don't upload non-existent features to OSM, even if you have plans on deleting them in the future. If this was a golf course in the past and you'd like to have it mapped for historical purposes, you should look into OpenHistoricalMap for your preservation needs. I've gone ahead and reverted your changes.
CurlingMan13 (2025-08-04 04:27:11+00:00): Please don't use abbreviations in names.  I updated for you:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175719029

You can read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#:~:text=spelling%20and%20tagging.-,Abbreviation%20(do%20not),-Main%20article%3A
Dani Safa Adi Nugraha (2025-05-07 10:15:32+00:00): Salam., setelah saya lihat sepertinya tujuan kita sama yaitu melestarikan bahasa lokal, terimakasih atas kerjasamanya.
Udarian (2025-05-07 01:42:41+00:00): names are not supposed to be used as descriptions, for more info see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-05-08 10:46:41+00:00): Thanks for the updates!

Can you keep the little crossing segments for bicycle access? Some routing engines for bicycle would not be able to reach parks otherwise. Thanks!

See this screenshot for an example of removed segments that should have been kept for bicycle routing:
https://ibb.co/zWvB8sWy
user_5359 (2025-05-07 10:00:17+00:00): Hello! Please use source instead of sorce. I correct the error!
HirschKauz (2025-05-08 11:51:30+00:00): Hi 

1) please do NOT delete keys that you don't know. highway=... is important for a way/road/...

2) in OSM all keys (except a name of an object of course) are in English 
Maybe you like to read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide 

Regards and happy mapping :-)
AngocA (2025-06-05 22:49:00+00:00): Hola Jorge
Gracias por contribuir en OSM, y recuerda que cuando se mapean ríos, estos se deben conectar con otros ríos o quebradas.
eggie (2025-06-30 21:52:05+00:00): Dag R-S   Waarom tag je access=no hier?

Wanneer er een C12 bord staat dan
is motor_vehicle=no
met
moped=yes
mofa=yes
psv=yes (bus=yes?)
..  toch voldoende?
'k Zie dat de place boundary ook geplakt zit aan de wegdelen. Dat is lastig bewerken. 

MVG
eggie
R_S (2025-07-01 21:34:09+00:00): Hallo,
Mogelijk heb ik iets foutief getagd.
De situatie in de Karnemelkstraat is voor zover bekend in ieder geval dat er enkel lijnbussen, fietsen, bromfietsen, snorfietsen en bestemmingsverkeer (laden/lossen) door mag. Het staat alleen wat onduidelijk aangegeven.

De buurtgrens loopt geloof ik formeel exact door het midden van de straat, de ene kant van de straat valt onder de ene buurt de ander bij de andere, vandaar dat die gelijk loopt met de weg.

Vriendelijke groet,

R_S
eggie (2025-07-01 21:51:00+00:00): Hoi..

Ik kreeg vragen over die grens van een medemapper. ... vandaar.
Denk dat hij die lijn had gesecteerd ipv het wegdeel.
Denk zelf dat access =no overbodig is als motor_vehicle=no is getagd conform een C12 bord.
..access=no geeft vaak problemen.. want dan moet je weer een aantal andere weggebruikers op yes zetten.
Groet..
eggie
AngocA (2025-06-05 22:49:19+00:00): Hola Dana,

Gracias por contribuir en OSM, y recuerda que cuando se mapean ríos, estos se deben conectar con otros ríos o quebradas.
TheSwavu (2025-05-07 11:39:52+00:00): The oneway:conditional cannot be the same as the default value in the oneway tag. Either set the oneway to no and delete the oneway:conditional or the oneway needs to be yes.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165934585
Mashin (2025-05-07 10:50:57+00:00): Hi Casey,
just a bit of feedback on these sidewalks.

1) When a sidewalk crosses a road (highway crossing) it needs to share a node with the road. We also typically tag it as highway=crossing.
see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5052106351

2) The sidewalks you drew are not very accurate. When drawing, try closely following the aerial imagery and place the nodes along the sidewalk centerline. Try also including more nodes as well. Particularly in curves so the shape is more smooth instead of being jagged. 

Cheers
Casey_Hartford (2025-05-11 19:33:34+00:00): 
Casey Moran <moran.casey.p@gmail.com>
Wed, May 7, 9:48 AM (4 days ago)
to OpenStreetMap

Thanks Mashin

Why does it need to node with the roade, it isn't a road? Does it not do that automatically when it crosses? What is the difference between all the crossing types? I was using "Marked Crossing" in adding these last night

Generally the whole neighborhood lacks sidewalks, just trying to give Onthegomap the ability to recognize you can go in and out of Colt Park, no less no more
Mashin (2025-05-11 20:02:03+00:00): Unfortunately, the node is not added automatically. I believe the purpose is to interconnect the sidewalk and road networks in order to make them routable. If the sidewalk does not share a node with a road then routing software can't give you directions accurately.

"Marked" mean that there are markings painted on the road, but there are no traffic signals. You can find more info on osm wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing
Cheers
Casey_Hartford (2025-05-11 20:09:27+00:00): Okay great, in that case these crossings are accurate as they are not signal controlled. Thx
Kovoschiz (2025-05-12 04:51:24+00:00): 1. Don't add your own advertisements to `description=` 
2. Don't delete other `shop=` directly, which contains addresses, and still represent a store space. Change it to a plain "point". 
3. Don't move objects wildly. Create another object for different locations
4. Don't add other info in `branch=` . 
4.
Kovoschiz (2025-05-12 07:14:20+00:00): 5. Don't duplicate `ref=` into `note=` and `short_name=`
MxxCon (2025-05-09 22:17:28+00:00): Hello.
Please note that as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone phone numbers should be separated only by - or space, not ( ) or any other characters.
Additionally, website urls must contain http:// or https:// as appropriate.
What is the meaning of "branch=Provided" tag?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165917953
MxxCon (2025-05-09 22:21:08+00:00): Hello.
As mentioned in your previous edit, phone numbers can't contain ( ) and websites must have http:// or https://.
If you are tagging "credit_card" and "debit_card", tagging mastercard and visa is redundant.

What is the name and address of the added convenience store?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165918148
user_21183540 (2025-05-07 04:56:13+00:00): virtual tour is also a source
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-07 03:46:02+00:00): ARGHAHAHAHAA

"delete nonsense " nie miało być częscią opisu zmian!
Lumikeiju (2025-05-11 00:40:27+00:00): Hi! I noticed that this changeset was tagged for review.

Seems good to me - `opening_hours=*` format here is valid.

An aside - I added some additional details in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166090218

Happy mapping!
pwbriggs (2025-05-11 03:58:16+00:00): I flagged for review because I wasn't quite sure the `opening_hours=` was correct here— thanks for confirming!
Lumikeiju (2025-05-11 04:57:56+00:00): I check with this opening_hours evaluation tool: https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/ (and ignore all of the public holidays warnings)
pwbriggs (2025-05-12 04:14:43+00:00): Me too 🙂 but I wasn't sure about the comment syntax because I've never really seen it in the wild. Thanks again.
Alexis Giraud-Courtney (2025-05-08 00:18:36+00:00): Correction tag was modified on "landuse=residential" I did not want to delete what was previously done I wanted to avoid display errors on mapcarta
user_21183540 (2025-05-07 04:55:51+00:00): virtual tour is also a source
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-07 06:00:58+00:00): Hello, and thank you for your contribution!

Your edit looks good, except that you forgot to Uppercase the first letter in the English names.

Since this is one of your first edits, it's recommended you check the Israel guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#The_basics
yrtimiD (2025-05-07 13:44:47+00:00): hi, also the 24/6 is not standard format for hours (in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12816126410) I'm afraid you'll need to do something like "Mo-Su: 00:00-24:00; Sa: off"
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-14 05:09:07+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed doubtful import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167599039
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-08 09:27:26+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12816144812/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-07 06:10:41+00:00): Your changes crossed intermittent streams.

Do you know if there are really intermittent streams here? If yes, maybe you should remove them.

The streams were auto-added and many of them are incorrect.

See this: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mass-removal-of-intermittent-waterway-in-the-carmel-region/126821
Sanniu (2025-05-07 06:39:27+00:00): This changeset technically connects nodes, nothing changes about streams and can't say if these are real or not.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-14 05:09:08+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed doubtful import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167599039
Dawid2849 (2025-11-23 18:17:32+00:00): i jak, przebudowano ją?
Fraxi (2025-05-11 08:02:39+00:00): Hello, PuhPuh! No offence meant, but I think that at this crossing there isn't a crossing island. Furthermore, node/3004458102 is NOT node/11172549423.  You could see here (https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=42.668614%7E23.275331&lvl=19.0&pi=-45.1&style=x&dir=332) what I mean. Yes, the images are since 2021, but I think the situation is the same. 
On the other hand, I am glad for your additional edits for the POIs that I have previously visited.
Regards
PuhPuh (2025-05-14 19:19:31+00:00): Greetings! No offense taken ;) I am only adding information to the map when I can see the spot in question, but it's possible I've misclicked. I will go back to check when I have the chance.
Fraxi (2025-06-03 14:25:30+00:00): Checked and edited

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167134736

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167138357
brassica (2025-05-07 11:23:42+00:00): Het bedrijf hanteert "GreentoGrow" en "Green 2 Grow" door elkaar.
jcarlson (2025-05-08 16:36:27+00:00): thanks for cleaning that up! just be careful, you deleted a legitimate address point. already fixed, and not a big deal. thanks again!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165922611
Eddie845 (2025-05-07 23:25:31+00:00): Hola, gracias por mejorar el mapa en el municipio de Ruiz.
Me interesaría conocer de dicho plan que menciona, ¿seria posible consultarlo?
mavl (2025-05-18 05:33:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166416092 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, wrong data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17683].
MrAnderson (2025-05-20 05:45:17+00:00): Something is not right here. The building area got distorted.
Michaall99 (2025-05-07 19:17:32+00:00): Dobry wieczór, dziękuję za edycję i witam na OpenStreetMap, proszę pamiętać o obowiązku dodawania numeru kierunkowego przed numerem telefonu przypisanego do obiektu. Apeluję więc o poprawę i dodanie poprawnego numeru kierunkowego.
Jakub Sýček (2025-05-13 07:52:12+00:00): I incorrectly used the operator:ref tag instead of operator:ref:ico (or whatever else is correct) for the IČO business identification number. Can someone bulk-correct this? This pertains to changesets 165885613, 165924452, 165967748, 165968667, 166002011.
Kovoschiz (2025-05-07 08:31:52+00:00): Again, you misunderstood this. `=motorway` is not about `=trunk` . It doesn't need a `ref=` . Cf Sha Lek Hwy. These roads only connects with the `=motorway` . They face the same restriction.