piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dcapillae (2023-03-10 22:15:54+00:00): Gracias. Estoy abierto a considerar otras posibilidades.

La etiqueta «faculty=*» se puede usar en la vía exterior (vía cerrada = área), no hay problema con eso. Donde no está permitido usarla es en una vía abierta. 

El principio de «Un objeto, un elemento OSM» es de aplicación aquí porque hay dos objetos que ocupan un mismo lugar: el edificio, que estaría bien definido por la relación; y la facultad, que quedaría bien definida con una vía cerrada (área) que engloba al edificio.

Yo mismo añadí todas las facultades de la Universidad de Málaga hace algún tiempo. Tuve algunas dudas justamente sobre este tema. Al final opté por seguir el criterio expuesto arriba, aunque, como le digo, estoy abierto a considerar otras posibilidades.

En realidad, no están nada claro cuáles son los contornos exteriores de las facultades. ¿Se limitan al contorno exterior del edificio? ¿No deberían incluir los jardines y áreas adyacentes?

Como bien comenta, ante la falta de una mejor información sobre los contornos reales, podríamos mapear las facultades simplemente como nodos. Yo opté por aprovechar las vías exteriores de los edificios, aunque no tengo inconveniente en usar nodos. Lo que sí me gustaría es que todas las facultades del campus se mapeasen siguiendo el mismo criterio.

En el wiki hay una página dedicada a Málaga: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:M%C3%A1laga. Si decidimos cómo hacerlo, podemos añadirlo al wiki para que otros colaboradores lo tengan en cuenta.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
dcapillae (2023-03-11 10:12:36+00:00): Buenos días.

He iniciado una discusión en el wiki sobre este tema: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES_talk:M%C3%A1laga#Objetos_relacionados_con_la_educaci%C3%B3n.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-04-22 14:02:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135228709, 135225625 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to fictional edits.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-10 20:42:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425616402
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425616401

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
michalgwo (2023-03-10 22:19:49+00:00): Jeden z tych domów nie ma podanego adresu w GUGIKu, ale był wcześniej w OSM, więc nie chciałem go ruszać, a dom obok miał w GUGIKu ten sam adres. Napisałem do nich maila w tej sprawie, poprawię jak dostanę odpowiedź.
NorthCrab (2023-03-11 19:46:46+00:00): Okej, ta sugestia nie jest absolutna. Zdążają się czasami przypadki gdzie 2 adresy są akceptowane, chociaż zawsze idealnie powinien być 1 :P
pitscheplatsch (2023-03-12 13:07:05+00:00): Just a test?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
pitscheplatsch (2023-03-12 13:07:53+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133535898
Leo Slager (2023-03-10 21:13:59+00:00): Top
Commodoortje (2023-03-12 07:40:54+00:00): Nette edit, kleine verbetering aangebracht:
collection_times=opening_hours=Mo-Fr 17:00
aangepast naar:
collection_times=Mo-Fr 17:00
Commodoortje (2023-03-12 07:42:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133576192
Leo Slager (2023-03-12 12:30:14+00:00): Lees ik daar nou over heen ? Dan zat ik zeker half te slapen :-)
berndw (2023-03-11 13:34:06+00:00): Ich werde dieses und die anderen Changesets in der Umgebung wegen mapping for the renderer und nicht abgesprochenem destruktiven Micromapping zurücksetzen.
Siehe Diskussion
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/massives-umtaggen-entfernen-von-building-yes-bei-slurry-tank/95326/69
Yitzchak M (2023-05-16 17:11:00+00:00): Hi Tsur. Regarding this way: Have you been there recently? I was there today, on the bridge over which the Israel Trail passes and looking northward, this way did not look passable with all the construction equipment on the track. Shouldn't the Tel Aviv-Jerusalem bike trail follow the Israel Trail? It's more logical, no?
Tsur Halamish (2023-05-17 06:12:55+00:00): Hi Yitzchak, 
Thanks for your comment.  I have not ridden there a while because its too ugly while the works are done on the railway. So if you see that part as problematic, I am sure it is. 

Normally a bike trail route should not be decided by us, but by the one who is responsible for this trail.
The Tel Aviv-Jerusalem bike trail was initiated by KKL and was supposed to be maintained by them.  But KKL decide not to continue a few years ago.  
Since then it has become a mapping community or cycling community thing.  No one is responsible for it really.  So your logic can be applied in this case. 
I took your advice and moved the relation of it to be with the Israel Trail just there.
Yitzchak M (2023-05-17 07:45:24+00:00): Excellent! Trust me. This is much better for the bikers.
Also, your English is excellent. Did you live abroad? I, personally, was born and raised in New York City.
LeNetsi (2023-03-13 18:08:36+00:00): Source used was Esri World Imagery; Mapillary
Gabriel44200 (2023-03-17 17:09:58+00:00): Estaciones de bicicoruña instaladas pero aín no están operativas hasta dentro de 15 días aproximadamente
Frans S (2023-03-11 09:58:17+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Please be more accurate in following the rooflines of buildings with extensions.
Also, do not include a yard into your mappings.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133534643
Frans S (2023-03-11 09:56:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133534862
Yitzchak M (2023-07-10 08:47:58+00:00): Hi Tzur. Is this path that you recently added really walkable? I hike frequently in that area and this path would really solve some hiking issues for me.
Tsur Halamish (2023-07-10 08:57:07+00:00): From the big square shown here, I cant see what I did. Can you send a link to it in IHM in a higher zoom?
Yitzchak M (2023-07-10 09:29:06+00:00): https://israelhiking.osm.org.il/share/XJsC67wrD3
Tsur Halamish (2023-07-10 10:02:33+00:00): It looks good. I checked now both Strava heat map (an important validation source) and an updated airial photo from 2023  in:
https://v5.gis-net.co.il/v5/MitzpeAfeq
(feel free to use this link too)
Yitzchak M (2023-07-10 11:15:45+00:00): Thanks! 👍🏻
FahRadler (2023-04-05 17:41:14+00:00): Hallo liamrocker,

kannst du mir bitte erklären, warum du die drei Bunker gelöscht hast?
Auf dem Esri Luftbild hat man die noch nie gesehen.
Hat sich vor Ort was getan?
liamrocker (2023-04-07 14:46:53+00:00): Hi, die 3 Bunkeranlagen WH f202a-c wurden bei Abrissarbeiten der Schachtanlage unwiderruflich zerstört.
liamrocker (2023-04-07 14:49:56+00:00): Hier ein Link: https://www.bunker20.de/abbruch-intakte-anlage-bei-schwalbach-elm/
FahRadler (2023-04-07 15:35:22+00:00): Lies dir den verlinkten Artikel mal bitte richtig durch.
Lt Protokoll hast du den vorangegangenen Änderungsdatensatz um 21:57 geschlossen (Rupolding) - diesen hier hast du eine Minute später geschlossen (500km entfernt).

Es wurde nur WH f202a beseitigt ("..wurde die intakte Anlage WH f202a...")
WH f202b ist vollkommen intakt, er wird zZ vom LfU genutzt.
WH f202c ist stark angesprengt.
Ich revertiere mal deine Fehlinterpretation.

Ergänze doch bitte bei deinen Uploads deine verwendete Quelle.
Frans S (2023-03-11 09:51:58+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please map only features as described in the instructions.  Farmland is not a part of it. In general,  Landuse areas are never mapped on Projects launched on Task manager, because these areas are often much bigger than a task square .
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133534933
Frans S (2023-03-11 09:47:14+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Square each rectangular building with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133534937
Frans S (2023-03-11 09:45:36+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:

Buildings not always accurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.
I send a new message about mapping of tall buildings

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133534947
Frans S (2023-03-11 09:45:53+00:00): About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Please adjust wrong positioned buildings as well
This video shows how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133534947
Strubbl (2023-03-13 20:48:18+00:00): Hi Splette, 
es ist vielleicht besser die Nr. 3c auf dem Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259111975 auch als Node zu erfassen, weil in dem gleichen Gebäude auch noch die 3b ist. Oder gilt die 3c für das gesamte Gebäude und die 3b ist nur verrutscht?

Viele Grüße
Frans S (2023-03-11 09:42:41+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Square each rectangular building with the Q key. You squared not a single building.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133535044
makoragi (2023-03-13 07:52:13+00:00): ウェイ: 628928599 を誤って修正されているような気がします
nyampire (2023-03-14 01:52:20+00:00): 修正しました！
Filip009 (2023-10-04 07:42:36+00:00): Čo bolo sledované pridaním tých 4 ciest SNM - Spišské múzeum v Levoči?
Frans S (2023-03-11 09:40:21+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Highway tagging.

Please use the rules how to tag highways on this project according to this wiki.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
You tagged roads as 'service road'  Service roads serve sole access to enterprises, farms Petrol stations.. Not  through going roads
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133535574
pitscheplatsch (2023-03-12 13:07:33+00:00): Just a test?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
pitscheplatsch (2023-03-12 13:08:03+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133533092
pitscheplatsch (2023-03-12 13:09:26+00:00): partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133537873
jmarchon (2023-03-11 06:16:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Nice work!
Note_Fixer (2023-05-13 21:45:39+00:00): wikadata is putting the plaque at the crash site not the park.
kakiremora (2023-03-10 23:22:33+00:00): Poprawka changesetu
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133267529
Glassman (2023-03-11 03:06:48+00:00): Thanks for catching this edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133537034
Rom1 (2023-03-14 11:04:53+00:00): Bonjour, il y a deux caméras proches l'une de l'autre https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10726900534 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10635283513 alors qu'il ne devrait n'y en avoir qu'une si mes souvenirs sont bon. Aussi camera:mount=wall est étrange pour 10635283513 car il n'y a pas de mur à cet endroit. Merci.
Rom1 (2023-03-28 20:07:55+00:00): Bonjour, ce serait sympa une petite réponse pour dissiper le doute sur les deux caméras. Merci !
Frans S (2023-03-11 09:16:04+00:00): Hello  Thanks for mapping.
You tagged small roads to farmland as Main highway (tertiary) which serve as roads connecting towns , villages.
About Highway tagging.

Please use the rules how to tag highways on this project according to this wiki.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133537503
Andrew Kvalheim (2023-03-11 17:42:32+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM! It’s not clear to me what change you were trying to make to 9824 Lake City Way NE. In this changeset the way has been converted from a building with a liquor store into empty retail land, but still has the detailed shape of the building and contact information of the liquor store:

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/221293960

Is the building actually gone? Or did you mean to tag the surrounding land (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Land_use) as retail?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133537543
Cy R (2023-03-17 16:36:05+00:00): Andrew, that liquor store still exists as it did before this change. There are several other issues in this changeset that I haven't had time to look into.

JDillion, welcome to OSM! It looks like you're familiar with the area--thanks for the updates. Please try to upload your changes whenever you finish editing a particular feature on the map. It's difficult for other editors to review updates and offer help when several unrelated changes are batched together into one big upload. I see from your changeset comment that you're practicing for school. We can help you catch mistakes and provide tips and suggestions more easily if you upload closely-related changes in smaller batches. Thanks!
Cy R (2023-03-19 23:26:14+00:00): I was mistaken--the liquor store is indeed closed now. I swung by today. Signage is still up. I updated the feature in changeset 133877230. Sorry about that!
pitscheplatsch (2023-03-12 13:09:36+00:00): partly revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133535898
Glassman (2023-03-11 02:48:09+00:00): As I understand, the land is owned by Bainbridge Island Park and Rec. It's unlikely that it would be logged which is what landuse=forest implies. natural=wood is safe because it only describes what is on the land which could include logging. Can you review this edit? Check out Kitsap county parcel data at https://psearch.kitsap.gov/psearch/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133538220
tobych (2023-03-11 08:46:48+00:00): Hi, sure, thanks, I've changed them all to natural=wood as you suggested.
map per (2023-03-14 18:54:51+00:00): REVERTED (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133351373)
Frans S (2023-03-11 09:32:22+00:00): Hello . Thanks for mapping.
About Highway tagging:

Please use the rules how to tag highways on this project according to this wiki.
access to farms and enterprises : "service road)
Access to farmland only: track.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133538331
Legitimater (2023-03-11 04:46:32+00:00): Background Info:

* Visited the Place
Legitimater (2023-03-11 04:46:09+00:00): Background Info:

* Visited the said POI
Legitimater (2023-03-11 04:46:45+00:00): Background Info:

* Visited the Place
map per (2023-03-11 09:11:18+00:00): Hallo Heinrich Wegener,

du hast hier (1) eine Bank/Geldhaus in die öffentliche OpenStreetMaps datenbank eingetragen. Gibt es die Bank wirklich? Auf dem Luftbild ist dort nur Wald zu sehen?
Wolltest du e.v. eine Parkbank einzeichnen?

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
❤️‍🔥 (2023-03-14 01:40:48+00:00): es gibt keine Bank (💵) hier, Ich habe den Punkt gelöscht. Wenn es eine Parkbank (🪑) hier gibt dann kann jemand eine neuen punkt hinzufügen
Allison P (2023-12-13 03:22:28+00:00): I think these are my fault. Tried to change the case of "Th" to "th" for street names when adding addresses but accidentally changed opening_hours too. Sorry about that!
HubMiner (2023-12-13 04:32:15+00:00): Hey, thanks for reaching out; no worries!
flohoff (2023-03-11 14:51:57+00:00): Moin,
nur weil ich den changeset gerade gesehen habe. Zu der übernahme alter namen gab es einen länglichen thread im OSM Forum und der tenor ist eigentlich das wir nicht alles einfach so übernehmen sondern nur dann wenn das geografisch auch noch in benutzung ist.

Nur so als Anmerkung weil ich gesehen habe das du das aus alten Karten übernimmst.

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133538660
Legitimater (2023-03-11 04:45:51+00:00): Background Info:

* Visited and Check the Street Names
okadatsuneo (2023-05-07 04:26:58+00:00): bun2000さん、こんにちは。
このあたりの駅のいくつかで駅舎にもrailway=stationのタグをつけていますが、こちらは不要です。
(「地物ひとつにOSM要素はひとつの原則」から)
駅舎はbuilding=train_stationのみでお願いします。

ご参考：
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:railway%3Dstation
bun2000 (2023-05-07 16:06:45+00:00): okadatsuneoさん。
ご指摘ありがとうございます。
変更したのですが、これで良いでしょうか？
okadatsuneo (2023-05-08 00:05:58+00:00): はい、変更したものでもOKですが、「building=train_station」としておくとその建物が駅舎であることがわかるようになります。
iDでは建物が「yes」となっているところを手書き編集が必要になりますが。。
bun2000 (2023-05-08 14:37:32+00:00): building=train_station了解です
b0ssi (2024-03-20 09:31:48+00:00): Hi @Fizzie41,

out of interest, what was your reasoning behind marking these paths as bridges instead of keeping them grounded footways?
GeeMaps! (2024-03-20 21:13:14+00:00): Hi b0ssi. I've listed the source as OSM Notes, so it would have been from clearing a note that said that they are suspended or similar.
b0ssi (2024-03-23 04:33:13+00:00): Hi GeeMaps!,

The change was made by Fizzie41 if I look at the history but I can't see your username in the history of these ways, what am I missing?

Ah yes, that makes sense if you worked off of that information, I was presuming that to be the cause. Technically not wrong but the entire pier is suspended above the water and sitting on stilts as well as the larger part of the promenade in front of (and probably including) the terrace houses; most of that is artificially "reclaimed" land. The pier and the open space between pier and terraces are wooden boards, the promenade in front of the terraces solid concrete. I'd suggest the latter to be treated as regular ground level (even though reclaimed and technically suspended and the pier marked as a pier or board walk of some kind, if that's really necessary but the ways themselves should just be regular ways on top of the underlying structure as the structures don't directly define & delimit them. Benefits would be more clarity (it's a bit confusing & misleading as a set of bridges) and easier to read. Thoughts?
Fizzie-DWG (2024-08-23 05:44:47+00:00): Sorry to take so long to get back to you! Other comment was made using secondary user name, so I don't blame you for being confused. I was only working on aerial imagery & a vague memory of being there a number of years ago, so as you obviously have local knowledge, please feel free to edit it as you think fit!
b0ssi (2024-08-23 08:57:40+00:00): Thanks for the clarification, Fizzie41, I've dropped the "bridge" properties from the path alongside the promenade and pier.
Frans S (2023-03-22 16:50:51+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings not accurate mapped and squared.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133538887
willkmis (2023-03-11 06:43:58+00:00): Hi, I noticed in this and some other changesets, you've deleted the "nubs" I draw connecting the curb cuts to the sidewalks. I draw those on purpose to make adding curbs easier in the future. For example, see a case like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8403520508, this style of mapping makes it clear that the raised curb is to cross the street, but if you stay on the sidewalk you can avoid it. Is there a reason you delete them?
Best,
Will
Local-Mapper (2023-03-11 03:07:36+00:00): This was Ensign Wind, not Pratt Wind
user_11609320 (2023-03-11 03:16:13+00:00): Although operated by foothill transit, the duarte buses have a different paint scheme since the bus routes are under contract
MxxCon (2023-03-14 03:50:50+00:00): How come you update so many POIs with billiards?
What about other sports?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133539296
emersonveenstra (2023-03-11 12:14:37+00:00): Hi,

Looks like you created a very small house here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153393075
Gsgeorge (2023-03-11 15:05:41+00:00): Thanks for letting me know!
Supaplex (2023-03-11 05:57:27+00:00): Hi,

Your changeset is too big. Try to split your change to just one area a time
Warin61 (2023-03-11 22:55:24+00:00): This broke the train route relation 3165393 PTv2. Do you know how to fix it?

The liverpool stops have no role. There should be only one liverpool stop for this route. The liverpool stop is not in sequential order...