piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Klaus09408 (2023-04-01 23:08:52+00:00): Das mit den Flächen war so nicht OK. Dann habe ich versehentlich beim Eintragen der Häuser eine Adresse bei Name eingetragen und es war sofort offensichtlich. Also habe ich den Irregulären Adressen die Adresse nochmal im Namen wiederholt. Verstößt aber gegen die Regeln. Also habe ich das wieder gelöscht.
Klaus09408 (2023-04-01 23:09:56+00:00): Trotzdem bleibt das Problem zum erheblichen Teil bestehen. Ruft jemand nur die Karte auf und schaut nur so lange darauf, bis er die Nummer sieht, die er sucht, dann fährt er falsch.
Klaus09408 (2023-04-01 23:10:32+00:00): Auch vor Ort lässt sich das oft nicht lösen, da die Reihenfolge der Nummerierung auch ungewöhnlich ist.
Klaus09408 (2023-04-01 23:11:17+00:00): Riu Xúquer 187 findet man nur, wenn man den Plan mit der Aufteilung der Grundstücke kennt, sonst nicht.
Klaus09408 (2023-04-01 23:11:47+00:00): Dann war der Vorschlag ist sollte City_block verwenden. Habe ich auch gemacht.
Klaus09408 (2023-04-01 23:14:04+00:00): Was zum Schluß die beste Lösung ist weiß ich nicht. Ich sehe aber nur die Möglichkeit, dass man es offensichtlich machen muss, wenn man den Fehler möglichst gut kompensieren will. An der Costa Blanca soll es öfter ungewöhnliche Nummerierungen geben. - Möglichst offensichtliche Darstellung auf der Karte (möglichst in vielen unterschiedlichen Vergrößerungen) wäre da am hilfreichsten.
Klaus09408 (2023-04-01 23:15:14+00:00): Messen lassen wird sich alles nur an der Anzahl der in die Irre fahrenden Handwerker. Bis es von OpenStreetMaps in die ganzen Navis, ... einsickert wird es sicher viele Monate brauchen.
Klaus09408 (2023-04-01 23:16:30+00:00): Damit schätze ich, dass ich noch ein paar Monate brauchen werde, bis ich alle Häuser gezeichnet habe und alle Adressen angegeben habe. Mit viel Glück hilft das schon.
Klaus09408 (2023-04-01 23:19:50+00:00): Witzig ist z.B. auch, dass in Less Llacunes de la Mata-Torrevella die Häuser 1-11 in der Straße Carrer Rambla de Gallinera liegen, aber eigentlich zu Less Llacunes ... gehören. - Mindestens das Haus Nr. 2 hat scon Rambla de Gallinera No. 2 am Haus angeschrieben. Vermutlich wegen der Handwerker, die selten ankamen.
Klaus09408 (2023-04-01 23:21:06+00:00): Vielen Dank schon 'mal für's mit Gedanken machen, was eine gute und offensichtliche Lösung sein könnte.
Grüße,
Klaus.
Sandal man (2023-04-02 07:49:46+00:00): Hallo Klaus, ich habe in der Telegrammgruppe von Valencia gelesen, dass sie sich das auch ansehen, also halte ich mich aus der Diskussion heraus, es ist schwer genug in dieser Urbanisation :-)
emersonveenstra (2023-04-01 11:03:18+00:00): Hi,

Thanks a lot for all the recent edits! One pointer when doing stop signs that are on one road instead of on an intersection like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10776628413 is you should always add the direction, otherwise routers can't tell which direction of traffic the stop sign is meant for
MK0 (2023-04-01 17:46:49+00:00): Thanks! I've been having fun adding details and missing addresses. I did try to add direction and failed. I will try again and fix it :)
gscholz (2023-04-03 06:16:51+00:00): Hi Luisa,
your recent activities have left behind errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-74.12571&lat=4.59236&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

As you may know, this kind of errors irritate routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
user_3022894 (2023-06-02 19:31:15+00:00): Hi,

die Nummer 2815 ist doch mit dem Key ref=* eingetragen. Ich halte es nicht für sinnvoll, diese auch noch mit in den Namen zu packen. In das name-Tag sollte nicht für alles mögliche mit hineinkommen, das Tag ref wurde nicht umsonst erfunden.
MrMoehritz (2023-04-01 18:52:54+00:00): Hello Buster03,

And welcome to OpenStreetMaps!

As requeted, I reviewed your changeset:

Please try to keep the edits within one changeset local (1). Therefore please safe the changes in one country before you move on to the next country. If you spread your changes over a bigger area like in this changeset (see (2)) its not possible to review and check your changes with standard analyzing software any more.

I still looked at some of the buildings you added, and they look ok.

Thanks and best regards

Mo

(1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
(2) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134363386 


Text stolen from map per: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134235788
gscholz (2023-04-03 06:14:58+00:00): Hi Xavy,
your recent activities have left behind errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-74.06819&lat=4.58971&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

As you may know, this kind of errors irritate routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-04-03 06:16:38+00:00): Hi David,
your recent activities have left behind errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-74.12571&lat=4.59236&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

As you may know, this kind of errors irritate routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Enock4seth (2023-06-09 19:12:27+00:00): You should tag ways in order to make them valid features in OSM, here i.e. building=yes. Better still just use the building_tools plugin in JOSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools
impiaaa (2023-04-01 23:45:26+00:00): It's often better to just remove the tags of a closed business rather than delete the point entirely, since some information like the address might still be relevant.
gscholz (2023-04-03 06:14:44+00:00): Hi K4rent,
your recent activities have left behind errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-74.06819&lat=4.58971&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

As you may know, this kind of errors irritate routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-31 22:40:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430053163

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
hlfan (2023-08-11 13:08:26+00:00): Seit wann ist da eine Autostraße? Weil wenn da keine ist, gehört trunk da auch nicht hin, weil trunk in Österreich äquivalent mit Autostraßen vorgesehen ist (siehe https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:highway=trunk#International_equivalence). Und wenn Mopeds nicht verboten sind gehört da entweder highway=primary oder die implizierten Zugangsbeschränkungen geändert (siehe https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Austria).
yumsandwich (2023-03-31 22:49:56+00:00): Added and Aligned residential roadways #adt
eggie (2023-04-01 06:40:12+00:00): Al een ouder account, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Allison P (2023-03-31 23:22:07+00:00): I doubt anyone does, but you might try RapiD. https://mapwith.ai/rapid
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-01 07:57:27+00:00): I've added the rest of the new development with the mapwithai/RapiD data available.
Enock4seth (2023-06-01 19:08:24+00:00): be careful not to accidentally move existing objects
Leticia Makafui (2023-06-02 21:54:12+00:00): Okay! Thanks for the feedback @Enock4seth
joost schouppe (2024-03-30 11:00:26+00:00): Hi,
You added a caravan site here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1141075001
But when I was there a month or two ago, I saw nothing indicated, and there wasn't really space to park anyway.
ivanbranco (2024-03-30 12:06:01+00:00): @joost
for the record, the caravan site was added by another user: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132305616
joost schouppe (2024-04-01 14:58:48+00:00): Ah, my bad, I thought I had checked the history!
nitsuj115 (2023-03-31 23:11:00+00:00): Updated Location
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134364566
Benoît C MdP (2023-04-03 08:11:48+00:00): Bonjour Britzz,

Avenue de la Porte du Pré Saint-Gervais, la bande cyclable viendrait d'être transformée en piste sous le périph ? Ce n'était pas le cas la dernière fois que j'y suis passé. Sais tu de quand date cette modification ?

Bonne continuation

Benoît
Britzz (2023-04-03 16:22:53+00:00): De quand je ne sais pas mais en tout cas constaté la semaine dernière ; je l'ai empruntée, dans le sens entrant vers Paris : la piste est isolée par des plots blancs.
Côté sortant, j'en suis moins sûr car sur la photo prise de ma part les plots sont largement occultés par les voitures mais avec cet indice et la logique, j'ai décidé d'être symétrique dans l'édition ;-)
Benoît C MdP (2023-04-05 14:55:37+00:00): Parfait. Je vérifie ça auprès des collègues.
Britzz (2023-04-05 19:53:23+00:00): Je suis curieux :  avez-vous une alerte sur toutes les modifs "pistes cyclables" sur Paris ?
Benoît C MdP (2023-04-06 07:06:40+00:00): Oui. C'est plutôt sur tout ce qui concerne les aménagements cyclables. C'est l'outil LeBonTag développé pour le compte de la métropole de Montpellier et paramétré comme il faut.
SomeoneElse (2023-06-15 10:28:32+00:00): Hello,
Can you explain why you deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539156630/history here?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2023-06-15 10:30:17+00:00): مرحبًا،
هل يمكنك توضيح سبب حذفك https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539156630/history هنا؟
أطيب التحيات،
آندي
Enock4seth (2023-04-25 07:38:12+00:00): Hi,

I see you have added several buildings without any tags https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tags

Mapping without any tags is completely useless. Kindly add tag `building=yes` to each building before uploading to OSM. 

Here is a resource on getting started with JOSM https://learnosm.org/en/josm/start-josm/
emersonveenstra (2023-04-01 11:12:15+00:00): Hi again!

One more tip for parking lots, it's best if you draw one parking lot area for the entire parking lot, not one for each section of the parking lot like here https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/42.98550/-85.67779
MK0 (2023-04-01 17:52:06+00:00): Thanks for the tips! I've fixed the parking lots and will do 1, or as minimal as possible to not have lots of sections
Joseph R P (2023-04-06 17:33:05+00:00): Hello, welcome to OpenStreetMap! When making minor modifications to separate features in multiple different locations, try to upload them separately when possible (e.g. make then save your edits in Fairfax before moving onto another distant city or state like Charlottesville or NC). This way, your changeset will not create a box spanning various other places and won't appear in feeds like the OSMCha unreviewed changeset feed for locations that are within the box but you didn't edit in. Thanks, and happy mapping!
felipeeugenio (2023-04-01 12:01:32+00:00): Hola
Bueno eso de agregar las superficies. Es muy útil.

No obstante, Los Alamos se e en las fotos satelitales de los más asfaltada. Le pasó algo? o se te fue la mano?
Lo mismo con Camino Costero. Me da la impresión de que está pavimentada.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134365645
gordo anorexico (2023-04-01 17:45:18+00:00): Corregido
LockOnGuy (2023-04-01 02:56:41+00:00): Hi asady100, why did you delete the veterinary?         
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5136682221/history        
       
Also, please use good changeset comment: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments        
        
And provide source for your changesets..
LockOnGuy (2023-04-01 20:42:44+00:00): Hello again asady100,       
A few months ago we, the Iraqis reverted your vandal edits in our country after you made huge problems when you vandalized the holiest place in Iraq (for the majority of Iraqis) and made our local community very angry. We reverted your edits alongside the DWG who also reverted your edits and issued a block on your account. We thought it was over when you stopped editing in Iraq, but were wrong unfortunately, you started your problematic edits again and today we noticed a changeset which is clear vandalism "https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134388255" therefore I had to revert your edits. I've talked with other mappers and they wanted to report your account, I suggested not to, but If you keep this type of vandal edits, you will leave me no choice other than to report you.      
I also would like to let you know a few other things:         
1- Please use good changeset comments and source, this is very important to let other mappers know what you edited and why, please read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments       
2- Do not ignore the comments on your changeset and answer what the people asked you, this is also very important. We the mappers of OSM consider communication is key for a better community and an accurate map. You can see the comments people left on your changesets here: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=7668789 and also you can read the messages the DWG left with a block issued on you here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/asady100/blocks         
I hope you understand and comply.    
Best Regards.
eggie (2023-04-01 06:43:29+00:00): Dag Ressha... Wanneer het alleen de naam van het gebouw is kan office=logistics beter weg. 
building=office kan wel. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Doffice

MVG
eggie
Ressha (2023-04-01 12:04:44+00:00): Hallo Eggie! De BAG gegevens stonden als industrial (wat oorspronkelijk ook de bestemming was). Tegenwoordig wordt het pand door verschillende soorten bedrijven gebruikt. Moet ik het dan nu zetten op building=office?
eggie (2023-04-01 12:09:26+00:00): Dat kan.... de tagging zoals die nu staat komt uit een import vanuit de BAG.
Je kunt het rustig aanpassen.
Mapse..
eggie
Allison P (2023-04-01 15:02:42+00:00): The preset for crosswalks got changed recently. I, PerplexingPenguins, and h551w had mapped a lot of them previously.

I can go ahead and fix them in bulk if you'd like. It'd only take a few minutes.
Jarrardi (2023-04-01 19:22:13+00:00): I'm just being a grumpy grump. Can you tell me how to do this bulk thing? I really don't want to create extra work for anyone.
Allison P (2023-04-01 20:11:59+00:00): You'll want to use JOSM, create an Overpass query to download all unmarked crosswalks, and add the extra tag. It takes less than five minutes if you've done it before.
SherbetS (2023-04-13 19:23:02+00:00): Hi DeerCat,

Please read up on how the OSM community defines cities:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dcity

I don't feel this definition applies to these objects, so I'm undoing your changeset.

Thank you for your contributions and interest in the map,
-SherbetS
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-04 10:55:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134490130 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-04 10:55:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134490130 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7017
Xvtn (2023-04-03 14:07:24+00:00): Is this a test edit?
Baloo Uriza (2023-04-01 16:01:22+00:00): Did this entrance close?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134367433
bxl-forever (2023-04-01 07:26:01+00:00): Hello,

I am referring to the comment here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134295538

"Bicycle=yes" is not a valid tag.
Keys in OSM do not have upper case letters, and "bicycle" is an access key, used to grant or revoke access in a street.

The point in the former comment is this:
* It is very likely there are additional signs to exempt cyclists from the one-way restriction.  Should that be the case, the proper tag to add is "oneway:bicycle=no"
* This part of Belgium is Flanders, and the M3 roadsign is very common in this area, i.e. cyclists and also lightweight mopeds are both exempted.  In that case, "oneway:mofa=no" is added too.

We will plan a survey here and repair the situation.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-04 21:41:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134514515 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7022
nabilersyad (2024-08-15 13:51:59+00:00): Hi. I'm not sure if adding that path to connect the cycle lane to the service road is the right way to map. It would be misleading to say that there is a path when you have to carry your bicycle up.
rene78 (2024-08-15 14:44:37+00:00): Hi Nabil,

you mean this one, I suppose.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150462845
Yeah, I have to admit that I used Google Street View to check this location. Always wanted to cycle there and see if it is really possible to get up to the motorcycle lane. Haven't done it as of now. Shall I delete the path first?
nabilersyad (2024-08-16 01:47:32+00:00): Oh I was actually talking about these ones. I was there today and there is a fence blocking any access. So you probably should delete those especially if it was found only on gmaps.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1158893894
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1158893895
rene78 (2024-08-16 04:30:12+00:00): Ja, correct. I  have just deleted it.

A pity though. So no chance at all to easily reach Kerinchi station or any of the offices in this part of town by bicycle from the motorcycle lane.
WoodWoseWulf (2023-04-03 04:08:49+00:00): Hi Formattedfool,

Welcome to OSM!

The correct way to add driveways is as highway=service and service=driveway. You should also connect them to the roads they are linked to (the iD editor you used should have this as a preset you can search for.)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway
user_5359 (2023-04-02 14:40:48+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/566983501, http://www.osm.org/way/566983484. What is the meaning of the tags
DATO_DATAFANGST = 2023-01-01
DATO_MÅLT = 2023-01-01
DATO_START = 2023-01-01
ID = 3461780-1-1
?
NKA (2023-04-02 15:45:25+00:00): Thanks, fixed.
julcnx (2023-04-01 05:22:00+00:00): Hey, thanks a lot for your amazing work! Just a quick heads-up, in Thailand, the Bing imagery can sometimes be outdated or misaligned. Although it doesn't seem to be a problem in this particular area, it's always a good idea to double-check with other sources such as Maxar or Mapbox. Keep up the good mapping!
Ynhockey (2023-07-21 20:55:32+00:00): @Ispoo it seems like this changeset was a mistake? I am not sure the new road exists, but it also moved some nodes inside Tzameret Dankner. Please have a look.
emersonveenstra (2023-04-03 11:16:36+00:00): Hi,

Did you mean this to be no_left_turn? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15668369
BubbaJuice (2023-04-05 05:54:04+00:00): I'm not sure what happened there I was just using the iD turn restriction editor.
emersonveenstra (2023-04-05 20:02:13+00:00): No problem, thanks for fixing it!
trial (2023-04-03 20:44:31+00:00): Bonjour, je m'étonne de ces renommages incohérents. En effet les "anciens" noms en bretons sont préservés et de surcroit le nom officiel semble Jean de la Fontaine https://www.morbihan.gouv.fr/contenu/telechargement/40152/294897/file/56-2019-019+-+RAA+-+MARS+1%c3%a8re+quinzaine.pdf (page 83).
Un name et un alt_name (ou old_name), voir un official_name (si le nom n'est pas utilisé en pratique) me semblent plus adaptés.
De plus les écoles ayant fusionné, un code UAI est maintenant obsolète : http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/byuser/lservonnet
trial (2023-04-03 21:16:09+00:00): il me semble que les deux sites devraient être réunis dans une relation, relation qui elle porterait 
École primaire publique Jean de la Fontaine et le code UAI. Voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10053442 par exemple
user_5359 (2023-04-01 05:57:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove youe SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys)
trial (2023-04-03 20:35:14+00:00): Bonjour, bienvenu dans OpenStretMap.
Le s à Inspections est-il justifié ? Stricto-sensu oui, puisque 3 IEN y sont regroupés. un alt_name=Inspection de l'éducation nationale serait peut-être judicieux.
Merci par contre de ne pas "squatter" un point adresse" : le 3 doit rester ce qu'il était un : un point adresse. Le point d'intérêt  Inspections de l'éducation nationale doit être ajouté à côté dans le bâtiment (sans adresse, qu'il partage avec la DIRECTE/DDETS)
user_5359 (2023-04-02 14:57:49+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/206406742. What is the menaing of the tag Квадроциклы = internet_cafe.
solenoid jam (2023-04-03 04:38:05+00:00): Thank you for finding the typo.
I'll fix it.
rab (2023-04-01 13:28:04+00:00): landuse=residential
+
name = MUPAWOSE PRIMARY SCHOOL
+
residential=apartments

shouldn't it be tagged like that?

amenity=school
+
name=Mupawose Primary School

---
should not intersect:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446591701
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1158899862

---
do not connect areas and roads:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10777231544

some wrong buildings need to be removed nearby
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499499260 ...
jmarchon (2023-04-02 04:31:46+00:00): Hey!
Are you sure Kings Valley Highway is a one-way near Kings Valley Charter School?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134369093
jmarchon (2023-04-04 02:46:19+00:00): I've gone ahead and removed the oneway tag as it seems rather out of place. Feel free to put it back if I'm wrong.
Xanadu_Contractor (2023-04-04 02:50:02+00:00): Thanks, I'm not sure how that slipped in there.
user_6110846 (2023-04-01 06:50:11+00:00): у цій правці маршрут пролягання дороги обласного значення О1715224 змінив бо відрізнявся офіційний кілометраж
sanch3z (2023-04-02 07:53:48+00:00): This changeset includes a lot of duplicate and orphan nodes near Tiefenstürmig. Is this an import of some sort?
opendcc (2023-05-01 08:16:24+00:00): No, it's some kind of mechanical edit (differtial operator on colour changes), spamming the data base with lots of redundant nodes and ignoring rules like tagging a forest along the tree boundary, not along the leafs.
Diacritic (2023-04-01 08:28:54+00:00): Hello and thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap! I noticed that you have added some buildings, but some of the outlines may not be completely accurate. Here are some tips to help you map buildings more precisely:

- Use high-resolution satellite imagery if available to ensure the outlines are as accurate as possible. Take note of any distinct features that could help define the building's shape, such as the presence of balconies, awnings, or rooftop equipment. Bing has the highest resolution, but Maxar has been updated more recently.

- To clean up your work after outlining, press Q to make sure all corners are at a clean angle. 

- Different buildings should be mapped separately, even if they appear connected by a roof extension, like a car port.

Remember, accuracy is key when mapping buildings. Incorrectly mapped buildings can lead to problems for those who rely on OpenStreetMap data, such as emergency services, delivery drivers, and tourists. Please take the time to double-check your work and make any necessary adjustments to ensure the buildings are accurately mapped.

Thank you for your contributions, and keep mapping!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-01 07:20:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10777322067

Pozdrawiam! 🦀