piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Tommybara (2024-03-09 07:54:05+00:00): So now you are apply your "personal knowledge"? What do you know about the "de facto control"? I mapped it according to sources by the governments? And now you are completely messing it up.
user_14538650 (2024-03-09 07:56:18+00:00): Go away dude! I don't need you to babysit everything that I do.
zluuzki (2024-03-10 12:57:06+00:00): Reverted as this line is more than clearly still visible
gsquaredxc (2024-03-11 08:07:09+00:00): Readded, this church has not existed for over half of a century
zluuzki (2024-03-13 17:56:55+00:00): "this church"? Stop trolling, I was obviously referring to the deleted railway=abandoned ways which are clearly still existing - those make up more than 99% of the CS.
Sakari_N (2024-03-10 17:12:01+00:00): There's no road here. Also please be careful when selecting road type. This is definitely not motorway link!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148472133
Elian D (2024-05-04 05:53:40+00:00): I see this changeset introduces a new way with the name "Wrong way!!": https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1259305881

Why is it the wrong way?
Tjuro (2024-03-09 08:13:13+00:00): Gelieve dit soort acties niet te doen. Als een huisnummer ontbreekt vraag dat aan op het forum of laat het zo.
Op'tRad (2024-03-09 15:01:02+00:00): Het is nr 40. Dus stond dat nummer bij een ander huisje, er tegenover, verkeerd. Wel nr dat huisje dan wel heeft, heb niet gezien.
Sakari_N (2024-03-10 17:15:28+00:00): Hi, Please be careful when picking road types. These are not motorway links. I changed them to driveways.
user_21029617 (2024-03-10 11:52:01+00:00): Dasht Shooli Raod
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-21 07:34:45+00:00): Hello!

You used
traffic_calming=hump3
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11707745591/history

Have you maybe meant
traffic_calming=hump
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
pittrichimica (2025-04-21 09:05:10+00:00): It‘s a typo, thanks for spotting,corrected.
Sakari_N (2024-03-10 17:06:57+00:00): There's no visible road here. And it wouldn't be motorway link.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148471946
Sakari_N (2024-03-10 17:05:15+00:00): Hi, I added highway=residential tag to this. Road looks OK but it needs to have a highway=tag to be shown on the map
Sakari_N (2024-03-10 17:01:33+00:00): Hi, I reverted this because added road was weird curly line. Looks like there is no road in this location.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148471696
Tommybara (2024-03-09 08:08:37+00:00): Well! So I don't even have the right to watch out and see if my previous edits have been vandalized. I was drawing it according to the sources by the government, which took me 5 days, while you are applying your "local knowledge". And yes, this will be my LAST WARNING. Either you revert it yourself or I will report this to the admins.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 07:03:18+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11707765559/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
JackNUMBER (2024-07-29 23:44:21+00:00): Est-ce la résidence sénior qui s'appelle "Chez Maman" ? Le nœud a un nom mais pas d'attribut qui le défini.

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/issue/c71f0837-c856-0ef1-bb7e-d15913c1edd1
aTarom (2024-07-03 14:38:40+00:00): Hola, una consulta, se pueden recuperar el name y el short_name de la versión anterior (1) de este elemento
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1259312606/history
o se retiran por que no esté activa o por que el nombre no está definido y quizás es 
"Zona de Bajas Emisiones de la Ciudad de Málaga"
según veo en
https://www.malaga.eu/visorcontenido/ANUDocumentDisplayer/171898/NOTAINFORMATIVA.pdf
disculpa si se me escapa algo, pero ante la duda siempre pregunto antes de modificar algo importante
Saludos
dcapillae (2024-07-03 16:09:21+00:00): Buenas tardes.

Decidí eliminar el nombre «Zona de Bajas Emisiones» y el nombre abreviado «ZBE» porque entendí que no eran nombres propios, sino nombres descriptivos. La zona de bajas emisiones queda suficientemente caracterizada con «boundary=low_emission_zone» sin necesidad de ningún nombre. 

Si se entiende que el nombre «Zona de Bajas Emisiones» es un nombre propio, tendría sentido recuperarlo. A mí no me lo parece, resulta demasiado genérico, válido para cualquier otra zona de bajas emisiones de cualquier otra ciudad de España. En definitiva, un nombre meramente descriptivo.
aTarom (2024-07-03 16:23:28+00:00): Ok, pensaba que sería mejor "Zona de Bajas Emisiones de la Ciudad de Málaga" como name, siguiendo ejemplos de otros paises de la UE. quería intentar crear un visualizador y las estaba filtrando solo si tenían name para poder listarlas automáticamente, sin el name me descoloca pero es problema del renderizador ;D, con más tiempo a ver si consigo algo, gracias por la rápida respuesta
Saludos cordiales
dcapillae (2024-07-03 16:31:41+00:00): De nada. Si finalmente decide añadirle ese nombre, «Zona de Bajas Emisiones de la Ciudad de Málaga», no lo borraré.
Layft Greater (2024-04-16 14:56:07+00:00): Why religion tag was removed? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2313451690
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-07-14 14:23:54+00:00): Was it impossible to get any hint about shop type from its tag value in that non English language?
osmviborg (2024-03-09 09:38:21+00:00): Er der skiltet max 30?
berndw (2024-03-12 08:17:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148536585
berndw (2024-03-12 08:15:02+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148536585

Das ist eine nicht für die Allgemeinheit gedachte Zufahrt zu den anliegenden Grundstücken, wegen den Waldwegen wurde auf eine entsprechende Beschilderung verzichtet.
Ich habe hier service=alley hinzugefügt, das sollte dann auchimrpoveosm daran hindern, das zu bemängeln.

Bitte demnächst _vor_Ort_ solche Sachen überprüfen!
olo81 (2024-03-13 19:15:14+00:00): Jest już oznakowanie? Ostatnio jak jechałem jeszcze nie było.
Yitzchak M (2024-08-11 18:04:45+00:00): What is the source of your change of this way to "asphalt"? Were you actually there in person and saw the asphalt path for this specific way?
מה מקור השינוי שלך בדרך זו ל"אספלט "? היית בעצם שם באופן אישי וראית את מסלול האספלט  לדרך ספציפית זו?
maze88 (2024-08-11 19:40:54+00:00): i'm struggling to understand which specific way you're referring to.
osm.org's editor just shows a huge orange square in the גוש דן area...

could you tell me which specific road please?
Yitzchak M (2024-08-12 00:13:52+00:00): Yes, of course. The url for the way is:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/50754071#map=14/31.9977/34.8778
The way is 5 kilometers long and the northwestern section of this long way is definitely NOT asphalt. Perhaps the section near the other side in Lod is asphalt. I recommend that you divide the way into two pieces, making the section you desire to be asphalt, but leave the rest in its original "tracktype=grade2" format. Just remember the OSM motto: "Facts on the ground" determine the tag. Did you see your change to the entire way with your own eyes?
maze88 (2024-08-15 18:42:09+00:00): Hmmm, since it was 5 months ago, I can't recall which part of the way I saw (and labled so)...
So in order to avoid inaccurate data, I believe it best we just remove the value for this way's property for now.
Yitzchak M (2024-08-16 00:18:17+00:00): 👍
BCNorwich (2024-03-09 09:50:31+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You added the number 50 to two different houses, I've amended one of them to 44. Please, if you are local, check that number 44 is on the correct building.

Regards Bernard.
osmviborg (2024-03-09 09:34:34+00:00): Hvor har du disse hastighedsgrænser fra, er der et vejskilt der angiver hastigheden?
osmviborg (2024-03-09 09:42:40+00:00): Max 30 her? Det kræver et vejskilt!
b-holdet (2024-03-09 18:47:11+00:00): @Eybye
Er det fordi der er skiltet "Ophør af 60 km" hele vejen rundt, at du mener at det er "30 km" man må køre her?
igor2parents (2024-03-09 09:28:17+00:00): Oops, messed up the comment and tags.

source=survey

survey photos:

https://archive.org/details/osm-survey-ullo-water-tower
maro21 (2024-03-30 20:24:14+00:00): Każdy zestaw zmian to zmiany. Proszę opisywać, co zostało zmienione. https://osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Branko Kokanovic (2024-03-09 10:15:15+00:00): Zdravo, vidim da si se uključio i da radiš lepo. Dobrodošao/la i ako imaš ikakvih pitanja, možeš meni na private, a imamo i forum na https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/rs/64, kao i telegram grupu: https://t.me/osm_sr, pa ako nešto nije jasno ili treba pomoć, tu smo:)
NeisBot (2024-03-24 12:40:43+00:00): Hello CactiStaccingCrane, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments \n
Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
eggie (2024-03-09 10:58:05+00:00): Dag Gretkatillor.. Je vraagt feedback.
Wanneer dit echt de naam van de winkel is dan is het correct, maar op de website heet deze gewoon Bloeiend. 
https://www.bloeiend.nl/onze-winkels/
Wellicht kun je wat onder description kwijt. .
MVG
eggie
palizdan (2024-03-09 10:22:32+00:00): موسسه خیریه حمایت از کودکان مبتلا به سرطان اصفهان (کسا)
eggie (2024-03-09 10:43:37+00:00): Dag Gretkatillor..
Tip..
In OSM taggen we bij op de adresnode. Niet op de gebouwomtrek.
Ook de functie dan toevoegen office=?
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2024-03-09 10:58:57+00:00): Info samengevoegd met adresnode.
Groet
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-09 10:30:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2255789365
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/415118652

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-06 05:24:04+00:00): Hello!

Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree".

So for buildings it is not needed to put House as their name.

Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1259341920 is specifically named with such name?

And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
    
Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.
wolfbert (2026-06-18 18:48:21+00:00): Was bedeutet addr:no=130 bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11707994936? Ist das nicht eine ganz normale Hausnummer?
silversurfer83 (2024-03-09 16:46:30+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht. Ich mache das mal.

Wenn die Praxis umgezogen ist, ist es OK den Punkt an die neue Stelle zu schieben. Die Adresse wurde entsprechend angepasst. Sehr gut.
Der Text in der Beschreibung grenzt ein wenig an SEO aber geht in meinen Augen noch durch.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit.

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148416737
juwemap (2024-03-17 07:18:44+00:00): Hallo und vielen Dank für das schnelle und ausführliche Feedback :-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148416737
Frans S (2024-03-09 11:26:09+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148416780
MarTSol (2024-03-12 13:30:11+00:00): Salut, je crois que la piste a été mise du mauvais côté de la route (cycleway:left, il faudrait cycleway:right je crois).

La piste n'étant pas encore accessible je crois que dans cette situation le mieux est de la matérialiser avec un nouveau tracé en tant que véritable highway=cycleway+oneway=no+lanes=2, et avec access=no tant que la piste n'est pas ouverte.

Bonne journée :D
tmartty1 (2024-03-12 15:58:34+00:00): Vous avez raison, merci, actualisé !
Frans S (2024-03-09 11:25:08+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148417015
marczoutendijk (2024-03-11 19:07:04+00:00): Your comment on this changeset is just ridiculous. What does "." mean?

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Frans S (2024-03-09 11:24:00+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148417449
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-09 11:30:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701207343
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1211920732

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2024-03-19 15:45:48+00:00): Hello Ravindra23@iitbhu, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments \n
Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
SOSM (2024-03-14 08:26:48+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM.

Da ist wohl das Kind mit dem Bad ausgeschüttet worden. Der Zugang zu den Häusern mit den Nummern 64 und 70 existiert ja und ist für den Zugang benutzbar (Rettungsdienste, Lieferanten etc). Kannst du den Teil bitte wieder eintragen.
SpinOff (2024-03-11 18:10:17+00:00): Hej. Ciągi pieszo-rowerowe to nie są drogi dla rowerów. Taki trakt oznacza się highway=path, czyli tak jak było.

Tutaj jest wszystko opisane: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w
eggie (2024-03-09 12:06:34+00:00): Dag AR. Probeer eens in de wiki op te zoeken hoe je een parkeerplaats mapt.
Zal de naam werkelijk Parkeerautomaat zijn.
Svo geen name  gebruiken om iets te beschrijven. Daar zijn gewoon tags vooe.
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2024-03-09 12:09:12+00:00): amenity=vending_machine + vending=parking_tickets - a machine selling tickets for parking.
AmpleRegret (2024-03-09 12:15:57+00:00): Excuses, ik maak sommige edits op organic maps en daar zitten niet alle tags bij. Is het zo beter?
eggie (2024-03-09 12:22:06+00:00): 👍
Nakaner (2025-04-12 14:03:52+00:00): Hallo,

alpine_hut setzt zwingend voraus, dass man dort übernachten kann. Andernfall ist es nur ein amenity=restaurant oder fast_food o.ä.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Surfexperte (2025-04-12 15:52:43+00:00): Danke Michael,
das was eine dumme Frage von mir.
Habe mein Fauxpas berichtigt.
itineris (2024-11-28 13:51:48+00:00): Szia!

Ordacsehinél a 67101-es bekötőútból miért csináltál secondary-t?

Üdv:
Ákos
MyFudalli (2024-11-30 14:04:23+00:00): Azért, mert az autópályáig főútvonal jelzése van az útnak (tábla jelzi), eredetileg elsőrendű főútnak akartam, de lebeszéltek, így másodrendű lett
MyFudalli
itineris (2024-11-30 17:38:25+00:00): Lásd https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/F%C5%91%C3%BAt
YomanNH (2024-03-20 12:40:40+00:00): 1. Czy na wale jest zakaz poruszania się pieszych, że dodałeś foot=no? Jeśli jest to droga dla rowerów bez dodatkowego zakazu, to piesi mogą się tam poruszać, bo nie ma chodnika w pobliżu.
2. Ta droga https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291428112 raczej nie jest drogą dla rowerów, tylko zwykłą drogą, którą można poruszać się wszelkimi pojazdami. Po Twoich "poprawkach" do niektórych domów mieszkańcy mogliby się dostać jedynie rowerami. Nawet nie mogliby dojść do nich pieszo.
canfe (2024-03-14 06:49:50+00:00): La WAY: 215445696 che tu per uniformità hai modificato in residential mi ha fatto sorgere un dubbio: siamo in una zona totalmente industriale. C'è un tag migliore di residential dato che non ci risiede nessuno? La rotonda, ma allora anche tutte le strade attorno, sarebbe meglio metterle service? Vedo che ti occupi parecchio di geometrie di strade e ne approfitto.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148418759
YomanNH (2024-03-20 12:43:40+00:00): Zerkniesz?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4160559
Jeśli jest tam rzeczywiście droga dla rowerów, to pole "note" z tego odcinka jest do usunięcia.
tordans (2024-03-14 16:05:17+00:00): Hallo! Auch hier der Hinweis auf das access tagging.
Ich denke hier reicht ein…

highway=track
motor_vehicle=no
tracktype=grade2

Alles andere ist implizit.
Viele Grüße und frohes Mappen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148419128
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-21 21:18:31+00:00): Reviewed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148419759
tordans (2024-03-14 16:02:24+00:00): Hallo! Nur zur Info, es gab noch ein "fixme=continue" an einem Weg das ich in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148649816 gelöscht habe. 
Viele Grüße und frohes Mappen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148419890
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-21 21:17:58+00:00): Reviewed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148419996
Samuele Battarra (2024-03-10 10:27:57+00:00): ciao, per segnare che un edificio è abbandonato va bene abbandoned:building, ma questo va al posto di building che va tolto
SimonTheGolds (2024-03-10 13:20:22+00:00): Ok, grazie. Chiedo scusa, ancora non ho capito bene come funziona il tag "abandoned".
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-21 21:16:51+00:00): The solution to overlapping buildings is not to delete random nodes on said building.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148420245
Fischkopp0815 (2024-04-11 07:42:18+00:00): Du hast in diesem und 3 anderen Changesets auf Helgoland einige  Läden zu shop=chemist (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Dchemist) gemacht.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1JMp
Da denke ich an Läden in der Art von Rossmann. Ich war lange nicht mehr auf Helgoland, aber das kommt mir hier merkwürdig vor. Sind  hier eventuell shop=perfumery oder shop=cosmetics passender.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Dperfumery
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Dcosmetics
pitscheplatsch (2024-03-10 07:42:44+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148450169
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-14 23:11:00+00:00): What source did you use for the handicap and hole information?
jpotas (2024-03-15 12:00:09+00:00): From the scorecard posted on the course website.
jpotas (2024-03-15 12:02:11+00:00): https://golf.metroparks.com/willow/
jpotas (2024-03-29 20:20:12+00:00): Is there a reason why you asked me ?
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-30 05:27:05+00:00): Please ensure you are utilizing appropriately licensed data, and not copyrighted data.   If we do not have the appropriate permissions, it is not acceptable to copy from it.
kubahahaha (2026-07-13 19:03:26+00:00): To jest na pewno Mieszkanie Plus?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5392136
philippec (2024-03-09 17:36:41+00:00): En is hij op de juiste plaats gemapt ?
Heb je een foto ?   Kan je erbij zonder te betalen ?
LennertS (2024-03-10 14:20:12+00:00): Dag Philippec, jep hij hangt aan de buitenkant van het receptiegebouw. Ik heb een foto maar mapcomplete kan hem even niet uploaden, ik probeer nog eens opnieuw. Ja je kan erbij zonder te betalen, zelf als de slagbomen toe zijn kan je erlangs wandelen.
trigpoint (2024-03-09 17:50:58+00:00): Hi
Something has gone very wrong, you have added strange tags (man_made=planter material=shea butter) to many objects spanning two continents. I am not sure what your intentions were but this is not good.

Maybe try using iD as a beginner and keep to reality in a smaller area.

I have reverted this changeset.
alpiliguri (2024-03-10 21:58:33+00:00): I do not agree with the cancellation of the two one-way sections. They still exist and will be reactivated in the coming months. They are only disconnected at the southern end waiting for the final works.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-14 02:30:32+00:00): Reverted by DWG - undiscussed OEG Import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163594357
effebi-sm (2024-03-11 10:14:25+00:00): In un documento ufficiale della regione Umbria vengono posizionati in questo punto :  Fontanile 1 e Fontanile 2 (di F.te Secca)
aceman444 (2024-03-17 22:53:30+00:00): Zdravim, dakujem za info. Davajte ale taketo info co sa moze coskoro zmenit do 'fixme', nie do 'description', aby to niekoho trklo, ze tam treba ist a znovu to preverit.
Taktiez ste dali "disused:" len na healthcare=pharmacy, ale amenity=pharmacy zostalo, takze je to stale ako funckna lekaren.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-09 13:51:04+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Miłosza":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11708386055
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11708386056

"Limbowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11708386097

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-03-09 17:46:01+00:00): Poprawione.