piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-19 20:00:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531777958
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531777957
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531777956
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531777955
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531777953
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531777952
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531777949
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531777943
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531777942
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531777941
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531777940
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531777939
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531777938
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531777935
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531777934
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531777936
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531777937
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216964083
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216944297
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216944306
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216964087
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216944308
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216944188
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216944322
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216944323
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216944377
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216964082
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216964088
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216964089
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216964090
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216964085
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216964084
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216964093
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216964086

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
demon_box (2025-08-12 16:07:31+00:00): Hi hecktor please can you say me the reason why in this your changeset you removed surface=ground
on this way?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/967036087/history#map=19/45.609993/10.308665
I'm sure that you don't really see with your eyes this way!!
I just retag correctly this way.
PLEASE DON'T CHANGE ANYTHING THAT YOU DON'T REALLY SEE.
Thanks.
Baloo Uriza (2024-01-19 21:31:14+00:00): Might doublecheck that, one of those numbers is probably fax
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146456239
VlIvYur (2024-03-09 14:59:34+00:00): On their website both numbers stand with the word "phone"
NeisBot (2024-01-20 20:31:03+00:00): Hello kamen1, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-19 20:21:09+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531834489
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531834520
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531834525
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531834531
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531834535
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531834655

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531834499
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531834528

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-01-19 21:38:09+00:00): Poprawione.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-23 17:37:02+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531833206/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
rui228 (2025-04-24 15:27:36+00:00): Done
Allison P (2024-01-20 00:12:47+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Note that the border does not need a label because it is part of a border relation with that information (more info on relations here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation)

I have removed these tags accordingly. Let me know if you have any questions.
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-20 06:11:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in part or full.  The feature is still visible in aerial imagery.  Access tags should be used instead of deleting the feature.  You can read why deletion is not the solution here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Please don’t do that; in OSM, if a trail/road exists but is not usable (due to being closed, private or simliar) we use the so-called “access tags” to record the fact.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146466560
MxxCon (2024-02-04 06:47:04+00:00): When mapping features that supposed to have right angles, such as buildings, you can right click on them and select "Make Square" or use shortcut key "Q". That makes your mapping look neater, and the resulting shape closer to the real world.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146457607
Xvtn (2024-01-24 16:03:27+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. Looks good, the only issue I see is that the road you added should be tagged highway=service, service=driveway. This tag combo is for private driveways that lead to one house.

highway=residential is for roads that give access to multiple houses, think the minor roads that meander through a neighborhood.

Anyway, thanks for your contribution, and welcome again! :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-15 17:10:00+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11532015016/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this edit
What kind of shop is here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting?
diwesser (2025-09-05 16:52:48+00:00): It's a billiards supply/pool table store.  don't see a category that fits well. https://www.thebilliardshop.com/
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-09 07:52:21+00:00): shop=billiard_and_pool_tables ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-09 07:53:32+00:00): and yes, it is a a full scale https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=ATYL that will be used few times at most

but at least will be detectable as some kind of shop

(or is it maybe company office rather than shop where you can walk in and buy things?)
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-19 21:30:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9831175294
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10313182843
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10250731883
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10313182948
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10313182675
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10313182665
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10313182661
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9045716525
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241189517
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241189499
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241189468
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241189477
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241189481
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241189482
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241189484
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241189494

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MxxCon (2024-01-21 07:31:47+00:00): Why does this building have 2 addresses?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146458575
Allison P (2024-01-21 08:16:07+00:00): Because it was merged with the wrong building! These Zartico mappers are worse than Amazon...
Sujanmanandhar (2024-02-09 19:10:37+00:00): Sorry for any inconvenience caused. Won't happen again . Please Accept My Sincere Apology.
dzidek23 (2024-02-15 10:57:50+00:00): closed? not even accessible for cyclist or pedestrians?
Adam Miller (2024-02-15 21:28:06+00:00): Nope - it was always a temporary road to provide access to the building site. The house building company has had diggers in and removed it.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-19 22:01:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11532498077

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
citrula (2024-01-20 00:36:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Addresses should not be abbreviated. In this case, it should be "North Earl Rudder Freeway". Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146459450
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-23 13:19:37+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11532496345/history has shop = abarrotes that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=abarrotes ? What kind of shop is that? Can it be assumed to be shop=convenience ( see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3805281 ) and changed remotely without verification? Or is it better to open a note and wait for a local check?
archie (2024-01-19 23:14:25+00:00): Vänligen skriv vettiga kommentarer.
Vid denna "löptur" har du tydligen missat att vägen Arendalsberget inte finns längre. Där har det byggts en stor industribyggnad. Hur kunde du missat det? Rann svetten i ögonen just då?
archie (2024-01-19 23:19:21+00:00): Korr: Ardalsberget
archie (2024-01-20 20:17:35+00:00): foot=no på Öckerleden? Även om jag håller med dig att det är inte tillrådligt att gå där, men ett formellt förbud finns väl inte. Vid infarten (båda sidor) av Lundby- resp Gnistängstunneln finns gåendeförbud. 
Med andra ord vilken källa har du för foot=no på Öckeröleden? Jag har aldrig sett några skyltar där. Tacksam för svar.
archie (2024-01-22 08:28:27+00:00): Jag har inte hört något från dig ang foot=no, men har kollat lite i osm-wiki och diskussionsforum. Båda dessa källor är överens om att foot=no anger det lagenliga att gå till fots. Jag kan inte se att det finns förbud för gående här. Sedan är jag medveten om att det inte är lämpligt. Så jag kommer att radera din taggning foot=no där det inte finns förbud.
archie (2024-01-26 14:56:39+00:00): Du har på nytt lagt in foot=no utan att det finns något skyltat förbud på stället (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146712194).
Vill du vara vänlig att ta ställning i den här frågan eller att sluta med detta.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-20 00:30:41+00:00): سلام. با تشکر از کار شما، اما چند نکته قابل ذکر است. لطفاً به استفاده خود از نظرات خوب مربوط به تغییرات مجموعه ادامه دهید، به عنوان مثال. ساختمان ها، به جای چیزی بی معنی مانند "gg". و وقتی نقشه‌برداری ساختمان‌ها را تمام کردید، لطفاً کلید "Q" خود را روی هر یک بزنید، که آنها را صاف می‌کند، نه اینکه آنها را به شکل‌های عجیب و غریب باقی بگذارید! با تشکر!
________________________
Hi. Thanks for your work but a couple of points to mention. Please keep up your use of good changeset comments e.g. buildings, rather than something meaningless like "gg". And when you finish mapping buildings, please hit your "Q" key on each one, which will straighten them out, rather than leaving them as strange shapes! Thanks!
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-20 08:44:13+00:00): When mapping landcovers, such as fairways and greens, they should not partially overlap. I have gone through and fixed it for this course. I encourage you to review this webpage to avoid common pitfalls: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*
Rainero (2024-08-27 20:45:23+00:00): Hallo phlers,

super, dass du mithelfen willst die Daten von Openstreetmap zu vervollständigen und zu verbessern!

Da du erst seit ein paar Monaten dabei bist ein paar Hinweise, wie es besser geht. 

Hier hast du die Kläranlage als Multipolygon angelegt. Solche Multipolygone sind für Flächen gedacht, aus denen man etwas ausschneiden will, das nicht dazugehört. Meist sind das Wälder mit einer Lichtung, Seen mit Inseln, Wiesen mit einem Teich, Gebäude mit Innenhof.
Bei einer Kläranlage sind die Klärbecken Bestandteil der Kläranlage, müssen also aus der Betriebsfläche nicht ausgeschnitten werden. Dasselbe gilt für Sportgelände, da sind die Spielfelder Teil des Sportgeländes (zum Beispiel in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17076020

Ich weiß nicht, ob es in deiner Absicht lag Multipolygone zu erstellen oder ein Missverständnis in der Benutzung des Editors ist.

Traust du dir zu das Multipolygon in ein einfaches Polygon zurückzubauen oder soll ich da unterstützen?

Falls du dich mehr einlesen willst, wie in OSM editiert wird, gibt es z.B.
https://learnosm.org/de/beginner/
Gerne empfehle ich auch https://einklich.net/osm/osm-tutorial.pdf
Da wird zwar auf den anderen Editor JOSM eingegangen, aber das Wie und Warum ist unabhängig vom Editor und m.E. gut beschrieben.

Wenn du Fragen hast, melde dich gerne.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
Rainero (2024-09-06 10:26:29+00:00): Schade, keine Antwort.

Ich habe das MP in ein einfaches Polygon umgebaut und dabei die verdoppelten Klärbecken auf je eins reduziert.
phlers (2024-09-15 21:21:10+00:00): Hallo Rainero,

vielen dank für deinen Hinweis ich war sehr beschäftigt und nicht in osm online. Ich habe wohl die Multipolygone falsch eingesetzt. Ich nutze den Standart Editor im Browser.
nslxndr (2024-01-20 09:37:20+00:00): Szia!

A wiki szerint a városhatár táblák a direction címkéjük miatt pontosan egy vonalhoz kellene tartozzanak (lásd a Key:direction wiki oldal Forward and backward című részét), emiatt nem tűnik jó gyakorlatnak ott kettévágni az összes utat.

Látom, hogy potenciálisan az implicit sebességhatárok megadása miatt történt a darabolás. Érdekes helyzet, hiszen azt is szokás felcímkézni, ám belegondolva a rural/urban meghatározás már a tábla és a direction tulajdonsága egyfajta feldolgozásának tekinthető gyakorlatilag, abból származtatott információ, ezért is hathat furcsán együtt.

Mivel a direction megadása elvileg kötelező, megfontolandó lehet ilyen esetben a darabolást (és így az ebből adódó implicit sebességhatár-képzést) az adatot feldolgozó szoftverre hagyni (Default speed limits wiki oldal Note for mappers része alapján gondolkodva), a GraphHopper mintha végezne is valami hasonlót. De igazából én is csak a problémára tudtam most rámutatni, minden igény kielégítő konkrét megoldást - ha egyáltalán létezik - hirtelen nem látok.
BáthoryPéter (2024-01-20 10:44:38+00:00): Szia!

Amit a wiki írt, az nekem is dilemma volt. A településhatár tábla minden esetben olyan változásokat hordoz magában, ami miatt mindenképp el kell vágni a vonalat. A sebességhatár a leglátványosabb, de a KRESZ szerint kismillió dolog vonatkozik máshogy a lakott és külterületi szakaszokra, elég csak tompított fényszóróra gondolni. Ez utóbbi információ nálunk egyébként hiányzik a térképről, megadunk ugyan source:maxspeed címkét, de ennél jóval több értelme volna a zone:traffic traffic címkének, aminek értékei megegyeznek a nálunk használt source:maxspeed értékekkel. Majd tervezem is felvetni a témát chaten.

A település tábla jelentősége nem magyar specialitás, minden országban így működik. Én emiatt a wiki ajánlását értelmetlennek tartom. Ebben a changesetben kipróbáltam, hogy milyen, ha egyértelmű esetekben kitöltöm, de például Alcsútdoboz arborétum felől végén ez túl nagy áldozatokkal járna a megadott stop tábla és hu-go szakaszok miatt.

Ha a navigációs programok felől nézzük, ők a zone:traffic alapján meg tudják határozni az irányt (ha meg van adva), egyértelműbb mint a végpontra rakott direction. Ha nincs megadva, akkor lehet tippelni az utcanév meglétéből (ezt a navigációk meg is szokták tenni maxspeed hiányában), vagy maxspeedből.

Érdemes volna a problémát felvetni a tag vitalapján.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-19 22:50:45+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11532550629

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
jmaspons (2024-03-24 11:46:13+00:00): Hola. Jo diria que admin_level seria pel municipi (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/346346) i que per el poble que fa centre es posa l'etiqueta capital=8 sense l'etiqueta admin_centre. Almenys és com està posat a tot els Països Catalans. Mira't https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:admin_level i, si cal fer algun canvi, mirem de fer-ho consistentment a tot el país.
Pirenex (2024-03-24 11:53:22+00:00): ok! Merci per la correcció i explicació
Hidoo00 (2024-01-28 16:28:55+00:00): Hej!
Jag ser att du har löst några anteckningar och lagt till nya bostadsområden – stort tack för det!
Några tips som kan vara bra att tänka på är att alltid trycka Q för att göra byggnaderna vinkelräta, och inte skriva in namn som inte finns, t.ex. heter nog elcentralen inte "Elcentral" och pergolorna inte "Pergola". Se följande förklaring: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

Lycka till med karteringen!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-19 23:10:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/145597213

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kubzon7 (2024-01-20 15:57:18+00:00): Dzięki za komentarz, przy poprawianiu kształtu jednego budynku nie zauważyłem, że brakowało imienia "Marii" w adresie "Marii Konopnickiej", już jest naprawione
NorthCrab (2024-01-20 16:38:02+00:00): Jasne! Dzięki :^)
MarcoR (2024-01-26 09:18:50+00:00): Ciao e benvenuta/o su OpenStreetMap!

Come mai hai rimosso il nome "Via Limone" dalla strada? 
La strada ha un altro nome?

Buon mapping,
Marco
CRCulver (2024-12-26 12:16:32+00:00): Why did you change the tagging of the cycleway at 52.2163035, 20.8845861 from highway=construction,construction=cycleway to highway=cycleway, access=no?
syntex (2024-12-26 14:04:51+00:00): Because it is currently inaccessible due to the construction of the metro line.
CRCulver (2024-12-26 16:29:58+00:00): But if construction is going on, then highway=construction, construction=cycleway seems like it was the appropriate tagging. So, why change it?
syntex (2024-12-27 19:57:09+00:00): This part of the cycleway existed before the construction. There is currently no construction going on on this segment, but it is inaccesible. The part which is under construction is from 52.216311, 20.885388 to 52.216307, 20.887459
MxxCon (2024-01-21 06:46:38+00:00): I think it's better to avoid - to indicate range since that's ambiguous with actual addresses that use - as part of their house number, such as commonly found in Queens and certain parts of Brooklyn.
I think it's better to explicitly list the addresses with ; or , rather than use - for range.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146461191
jmapb (2024-01-21 22:01:28+00:00): "-" really is a damned boondoggle. I really wish Queens hadn't adopted it as separator punctuation in their addresses, and I really wish other New Yorkers wouldn't use it to sign ranges. But they did, and they do.

I've struggled a lot with how to deal with this. When a poi really does appear to be using the whole range as their housenumber (2752-2758 in this example) my instinct is to angrily tag what I see.

The other obvious tactic is just to tag it with the lowest housenumber in the range. This looks better from a data hygiene point of view, and avoids any Queens-style confusion. But it conveys less information, and it doesn't follow OSM's "truth-on-the-ground" best practice.

Nonetheless, putting the whole range in addr:housenumber is annoying enough that I'd much rather just use a single number, if I can justify it somehow. The good news is, I think I can justify it here -- seems this place has a website https://www.atlanticcarsale.com and the housenumber listed there is simply 2752. So, making believe that the website is equivalent to on-the-ground signage, I've changed this car dealer to `housenumber=2752`.

I could talk about this problem all day, and probably should at some point.

If you haven't read it yet, here's NYC's summary of the address formats in use & how the city's own geocoding software handles them: https://nycplanning.github.io/Geosupport-UPG/chapters/chapterV/section02/#house-number-format-standards

And here's a proposal for a tag that might be of use to us, if it were ever adopted by geocoders: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Addr:interval
MxxCon (2024-01-22 02:58:37+00:00): But more practically speaking, I think 99% of situations we'll encounter will be just a single house number. If some biz or a building or whatever takes over multiple house numbers, I imagine 1 will be its primary one and others will either just disappear or might be used for some separate purpose, such as service entrance or something and that can be tagged separately if necessary.
jmapb (2024-01-22 03:35:16+00:00): Absolutely, if possible. I only map this way as a last resort.

Here's one I remember doing a while back: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249606377

It's signed 798-812, right under the Colonel's nose. It's 798-812 on the website ( even right in the url: https://locations.kfc.com/ny/brooklyn/798-812-4th-avenue ). There's no reason to think the restrooms are 798 4th Ave and the drive-thru window is 812 4th Ave. By all available evidence, the real-world address of this place is 798-812. So that's what I tagged, and added the address interpolation way to boot. Frankly it's hideous, but I still think it's less bad than any currently-available alternatives.
gscholz (2024-01-23 08:43:10+00:00): Hi Manfutu,
your recent changesets have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways, for example here:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=116.84168&lat=40.33004&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146461200

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Filip009 (2024-01-23 09:56:32+00:00): Dobrý deň, pokiaľ sa lekáreň nachádza v celej budove, tak ste ju pridal správne. Pokiaľ sa ale nachádza iba v niektorej časti budovy, odporúčaj ju prerobiť do bodu a presunúť ho na miesto, kde sa nachádza jej vchod.
Filip009 (2024-01-23 09:56:49+00:00): *odporúčam
TomasTN (2024-01-24 08:40:35+00:00): Dobrý deň,
ďakujem za upozornenie. NIE lekáreň sa nenachádza v celej budove ale v konkrétnej časti.
Snažil som sa bod Lekáreň presunúť na správne miesto (tam kde je vchod) ale očividne som na to neprišiel.
Keď máte link na nejaký návod alebo viete odporučiť postup, tak by mi to pomohlo...
Ďakujem
Filip009 (2024-01-24 09:21:43+00:00): Stlačte tlačidlo nápoveda vpravo, alebo klávesová skratka "H" pri spustenej úprave mapy. Celkom dole je veľká mapa s textom "Začni prehliadku". Odporúčam prejsť na záložku "Body". Tam je vysvetlené, ako sa pridávajú body.
MxxCon (2024-01-21 06:47:29+00:00): You forgot to remove email tag here.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146461376
citrula (2024-01-20 00:42:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Thanks for your contribution. If you know the names of the other unnamed streets in this neighborhood, it would be a great help to add them! Let me know if you have any questions, and happy mapping :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146461589
JStory17 (2024-01-20 21:42:14+00:00): I'm on it! I'll have the rest of the streets added over the weekend.
felipeeugenio (2024-01-20 22:03:51+00:00): Hola
Movió un cruce como dos cuadras. por favor cuidado con las ediciones