piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
qkaz (2026-04-14 13:24:06+00:00): *Type=Route meinte ich
qkaz (2026-04-14 16:50:27+00:00): Ich habe Route=Pipeline noch hinzugefügt. Die Verlinkung in Wikipedia funktioniert mit Type=Route jetzt.
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-11 20:56:21+00:00): HTML/iframe injection attempting JavaScript execution via OSM tag.

Should be reverted.
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-11 20:56:37+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183984207
plennert (2026-04-15 05:17:33+00:00): Hallo Daniel,
ist hier access=yes richtig, wenn der AED im Gebäude ist? Ist das Gebäude 24/7 offen`? Wäre nicht access=costumer besser?
Gruss, Ralph
MatthieuMartin (2026-07-19 15:18:00+00:00): Salut K12230LF,
Concernant la modif de ce chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/687292583
Sur la BANO, cela serait plutôt Chemin du Champ du Moulin je pense : https://bano.openstreetmap.fr/pifometre/pifomap?ratio=N&insee=21086#map=17.74/46.993417/4.828262

Bonne carto!
Matthieu
joost schouppe (2026-04-14 14:16:29+00:00): Hoi Witse,
Ik weet niet goed wat je met die spoed-ingang aan de noordkant van het gebouw hebt willen doen, maar opeens waren er twee op die locatie. Ik heb ze terug samengevoegd tot één object
Татусь (2026-04-21 18:03:26+00:00): amenity на будівлю не ставиться. деномінація не прописується в назві, для цього є окремий тег 	ukrainian_orthodox!!!
vmanulik (2026-04-21 19:27:07+00:00): А для продуктивної комунікації існують правила правопису та адекватна поведінка. Коли продемонструєте володіння цими навичками, я зможу вам аргументувати причину. Ну а доти — бувайте, та повчання свої заберіть із собою.
Татусь (2026-04-21 19:41:50+00:00): Це правила спільноти OSM, а не повчання. Якщо їх не дотримуватися, то вас спільна OSM вважатиме некомпетентним, ваш профіль буде заблокований, а всі ваші правки будуть скасовані і повернуті до попередніх версій!
vmanulik (2026-04-21 19:51:53+00:00): Будь-ласка, надайте посилання на конкретний пункт чи розділ спільноти OSM, де вказана необхідність використання потрійного знаку оклику. Коли ви зможете аргументувати хоча б це, тоді й поговоримо. Поки я бачу лише вільні роздуми на тему майбутнього. А щодо правил — дякую, я в курсі справжніх правил. Проте маю причину робити саме так.
Татусь (2026-04-21 20:35:05+00:00): Дійсно. Якщо ви будете робити так, як вам заманеться, говорячи, що ви в курсі справжніх правил, то тоді навіщо ті правила. Ще раз вам нагадую, – деномінацію не прописуємо в назві! Для цього окремий тег!
NieWnen (2026-04-14 20:31:54+00:00): Cześć,
nie mapujemy pasów rowerowych jako oddzielne linie. Te są przeznaczone na DDR/CPR.

Pasy rowerowe tagujemy w linii jezdni tagami cycleway=* i cycleway:*=lane
co już było zrobione, więc ta zmiana jest niepoprawna i została wycofana.

Zachęcam do zapoznaniem się z wiki, strona rowery: wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery
Dominik1235 (2026-04-14 22:00:27+00:00): Oh dzieki wielkie za info, sorry za zwłokę, do jazdy rowerem używam aplikacji "Cyclers" która jest bazowana na open street map i nie wykrywa pasu rowerowego ani tutaj ani na Harfowej, stąd moje zmiany
Dominik1235 (2026-04-14 22:03:52+00:00): Myślałem że to jest problem po stronie OPM a widać to jest problem po stronie developera :D
NieWnen (2026-04-14 22:05:36+00:00): No ogólnie nie zmieniamy danych w OSM pod działanie zewnętrznych aplikacji, bo mielibyśmy spory bałagan, więc to aplikacja powinna zostać dostosowana.

Zachęcam do skontaktowania się z autorami aplikacji, żeby uwzględnili tagowanie pasów rowerowych :)

Można im podesłać stronę z wiki dla lepszego kontekstu.
Dominik1235 (2026-04-14 22:19:04+00:00): Oczywiście, skontaktowałem się z autorami, szczególnie że jak przeglądałem mapę to w wielu sytuacjach poprawnie pokazuje takie pasy

Wydaje mi się że błąd im się pojawił przez to że jest też z drugiej strony ulicy zjazd na ścieżkę, który jest już zsetupowany jako osobny fragment, dałem znać autorom aplikacji, jeszcze raz przepraszam za problem
NeisAgent (2026-04-14 16:33:34+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
B252697 (2026-04-14 13:35:40+00:00): I walked past Serangoon Community Park earlier today, and I realised the OpenStreetMap of Serangoon Community Park was not updated. and the existing footpaths were not drawn accurately. Some (new) footpaths were also missing. So I've just attempted to update it for more accurate and up-to-date data
contrapunctus (2026-04-25 17:41:33+00:00): Ooof. Sorry about the large bounding box. :|
NeisBot (2026-04-14 13:42:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 15 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1077233214 v2 | 15 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181323560
iandees (2026-04-14 13:45:42+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9877138204 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181323904, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-04-14 13:48:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 18 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1444276820 v1 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/146543525 v7 | 9 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13252308200 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181323802
iandees (2026-04-14 13:54:24+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13252308200 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181324289, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
kubahahaha (2026-04-19 21:12:40+00:00): Skasowałem dorgę przez zamarznięty kanał - w Polsce jednak nie mamy dróg lodowych, przez > 350 dni w roku wprowadzało by to w błąd
kubahahaha (2026-04-19 21:12:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181555685
Vinber-Pro (2026-06-12 08:57:11+00:00): Salut,
à creuser mais pour les "faculty" je pense qu'il serait préférable de partir sur les valeurs existantes non ?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:faculty?uselang=fr#Usage_examples

à plus
Vinber-Pro (2026-06-12 08:57:43+00:00): en référence à cet objet https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1497692606
NeisBot (2026-04-14 13:51:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 21 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1443940859 v1 | 11 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1443940858 v1 | 10 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13249886022 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181324084
NieWnen (2026-04-14 19:50:58+00:00): O, fajnie że się udało zweryfikować!

Czyli to pewnie do zamknięcia :P
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5016032
Anas masuris (2026-04-14 19:54:32+00:00): Anom, dzięki temu, że miałem wyjście służbowe :p Plus też na mapce GPA jest zaktualizowane
NeisBot (2026-04-14 14:06:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13730080485 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Gutter service"

#MapWithoutSpam
Ltrlg (2026-04-18 20:24:28+00:00): Il s’agit d’un street_cabinet=postal_service, j’imagine ?
Sébastien Chopin (2026-04-19 04:05:05+00:00): En effet. Je ne connaissais pas ce tag. Merci pour l’info.
Ltrlg (2026-04-19 06:41:27+00:00): J’ai modifié les autres : changeset/181524307.
Sébastien Chopin (2026-04-20 17:55:28+00:00): ¡ Merci à toi !
Cybermanx (2026-04-14 21:01:08+00:00): Ciao, mi sono permesso di fare un partial revert per mantenere la history e i tag della way che rappresenta Via de' Gandolfi. Appena carica questo changeset, ne creo uno nuovo in cui replico l'edit che hai fatto, ma conservando queste due informazioni.
Il resto delle cose mi sembrano più che corrette, comprese altri changeset precedenti in cui vedo che hai sempre lasciato il flag "review_requested".
Per qualunque cosa, non farti problemi a scrivermi.
Buon mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181341606
NeisBot (2026-04-14 14:39:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/286699855 v10

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Work clothing store"

#MapWithoutSpam
Dimitar155 (2026-04-14 15:28:13+00:00): clothes=vintage?
mechka (2026-04-14 18:21:37+00:00): Thanks! The wiki approves of clothes=vintage, so I've added it. I didn't use it originally because ID didn't offer it as an option.
Wildsharky (2026-04-15 08:52:27+00:00): Revert of 181277776
Wildsharky (2026-04-16 09:27:07+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181394366
NeisBot (2026-04-14 15:03:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/266397973 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "fishing lake"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisBot (2026-04-14 14:50:23+00:00): Hello D4C-on-top, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1499353219

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181326910
NeisRevert (2026-04-15 08:22:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/181354920
where the comment is: "Revert unclear map edits"
rui228 (2026-04-25 17:42:35+00:00): Olá. Porque alteraste o nome da Rua Central da Vergada para Rua Central. 
Existe um placa toponímica no entroncamento da Rua de Ordonhe  "Rua Central da Vergada", (que adicionei), assim como no portal da Câmara municipal de Santa Maria da Feira, aparece a artéria como sendo Rua Central da Vergada. 
Cumprimentos.
GuidingGecko (2026-04-25 18:59:31+00:00): Boas, tinha adicionado alguns números de porta com base nos dados INE 2021. Parte da numeração dessa rua surge como Rua Central 4505-028 (até ao entroncamento com a Rua Presa de Cima). Restante numeração (877 e superior) como Rua Central da Vergada 4505-006. Assumi que a info dos censos esteja correta mas erros podem sempre acontecer.
rui228 (2026-04-25 19:10:13+00:00): Obrigado pela resposta. Boas edições.
NeisRevert (2026-04-15 08:21:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/181354914
where the comment is: "Revert unclear map edits"
Wildsharky (2026-04-16 09:27:50+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181394552
fx99 (2026-04-16 14:51:37+00:00): Du hast Rad- und Fußweg auf der Behelfsbrücke über die A81 zw. BB und Sifi gelöscht. Gibt es die wirklich nicht mehr? Ist die direkte Strecke schon freigegeben?
rodeostar (2026-04-16 19:01:20+00:00): Die Behelfsbrücke ist zwar noch da, aber der Rad- und Fußweg wurde komplett entfernt. Auch die eine Fahrbahnrichtung Sindelfingen für das Auto wurde entfernt. Beide Fahrtrichtungen für das Auto laufen nun auf der Brücke Richtung Böblingen.
EneaSuper (2026-04-15 12:15:49+00:00): Ciao, temo che questo elemento sia posizionato in maniera errata, ma magari mi sbaglio...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443203938#map=18/44.440338/8.760227
JJIglesias (2026-04-14 21:47:26+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera.

Gracias
eggie (2026-04-15 07:01:48+00:00): Dag Joani,

De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
HellMap (2026-04-18 18:41:17+00:00): This edit especially has added a huge number of incorrect waterways and invalid fords blocking routing all over the place. Even where you attempted to fix some of it, you left fords all across the parking ways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13730335051. Please fix all of these.
bbmiller (2026-07-13 14:28:31+00:00): Hey, just a note that this changeset has left one of the affected ways (1499365280) with no tags, and belonging to no relation.
b-jazz (2026-07-22 19:13:00+00:00): Thanks bbmiller. Looks like others have removed the entire relation but possibly left behind elements that weren't part of the original relation. Those have been cleaned up by others as well.
neuhausr (2026-05-27 14:05:08+00:00): Hi, way 1499365338 is very long but has no tags--do you remember what it is supposed to be? Thanks!
b-jazz (2026-05-27 19:28:29+00:00): Looks like it was part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180969802 and the other components of that "ecoregion" were deleted. This lingering way should have also be deleted, but was probably missed because they were only looking for the original mapper. I've gone ahead and deleted it. Thanks for letting me know.
JJIglesias (2026-04-14 21:46:35+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores.

Gracias
NeisBot (2026-04-14 15:46:16+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 439 of your last 439 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=24041792
rempshaener (2026-04-14 20:23:29+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe folgende Anmerkungen:

Pommelsbrunn:
Die Referenz hängt am Gebäude (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93721895), nicht am amenity=fire_station (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1455326335). Die Daten gehören an das  amenity=fire_station. Heißt: bitte bis auf building=fire_station alles am Gebäude löschen und auf den Umriss ziehen.

Stallbaum:
Die Daten zu amenity=fire_station auf einer Gebäudeecke sind eher ungewöhnlich. Die Daten sollten auf das Gebäude oder auf den Geländeumriss.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
hoserab (2026-04-14 17:10:26+00:00): Hello,

You dropped the speed limit here from 60 km/h to 50. Do you have a source for this? I've lived in Calgary my whole life, and 16th Ave between 21st Street and 6th Street has been 60 km/h for decades. (When I was a teenager I remember being chastised by a driving instructor for letting the car coast down the hill westbound and gather speed >60...)

Now I'll grant you I haven't driven this stretch of 16th in a couple months, so maybe it had dropped. However, if you don't have a source I'm going to change this back.

Thanks :)
Константин Гам (2026-05-04 16:41:06+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Вы вносите не существующие данные в базу, не надо так делать. Пожалуйста, прежде чем делать правки, постарайтесь приехать на место и проверить, что вы вносите.
На сайтах застройщиков много фантазий, рисовать стоит по собранным самостоятельно данным.
Спасибо.
richlv (2026-04-16 20:55:14+00:00): Sveiki, paldies par kartes papildināšanu.
Te ēkai https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110798422/history tika pielikts numurs, bet to automātiskais process noņēma.
Vai šī adrese ir oficiāli piešķirta? Ja nē, tā kartes datos nesaglabāsies, un to vajadzētu risināt ar pašvaldību.
NeisBot (2026-04-14 16:15:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13547208425 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Sports card store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-14 22:33:18+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 11:39:02+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values

https://osm.org/changeset/184909167
Wildsharky (2026-04-16 09:28:31+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181396288
Wildsharky (2026-04-16 09:24:41+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181356763
MappingMore (2026-04-16 05:40:27+00:00): Partially Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181300111
MappingMore (2026-04-16 05:55:43+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181395793
Norbert Dichter (2026-04-15 16:38:19+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181332671
user_5359 (2026-07-11 09:23:03+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10100059344. What is the mean of the tags
addr:street = Go Smile Road
highway = residential road (normally only residential)
name = Go Smile Road
A street is not a node. if the node is an adress, you doesn't need the key name.
NeisBot (2026-04-14 16:57:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13730412885 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Atelier de reliure"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : « Atelier de reliure »
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisBot (2026-04-14 16:57:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13730470301 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tattoo parlor"

#MapWithoutSpam
vrix (2026-04-15 06:39:12+00:00): "Bac Ninh" (N369487046) can't be found on Nominatim anymore (https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=N&osmid=369487046 returns not found)

Could you please review your changeset?
ZioDragon (2026-04-15 06:54:33+00:00): As of July 1st, 2025, Bac Ninh City will no longer be updated in the system due to the administrative reform from a three-tiered system to a two-tiered system. Therefore, it needs to be updated to reflect the current situation. This may cause errors, and I will find a way to fix them. Thank you for reporting.
Dodko (2026-04-21 14:01:42+00:00): Chýba značka že je to firma
adresa sa nedáva duplicitne
galen8183 (2026-04-14 17:12:08+00:00): most of this mess is from https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/vanburin "fixing" iD validator warnings with no review whatsoever... I really wish people would care about more than just their golf courses/railways/whatever :/ (or at least don't touch things they don't care about...)