piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
matheusgomesms (2023-03-08 10:15:32+00:00): Oi danctc,

Primeiro parabéns pela sua dedicação no mapeamento dos metrôs no Brasil! Trabalho excelente!

Dúvida aqui de iniciante nesse tema: a relação tá com duas estações, sendo uma label e outra station. Faz sentido esse ponto com esse label? Tendo a estação (área) já mapeada e na relação como station, já não cumpriria esse papel, fazendo o label redundante?

Desde já agradeço!

Abraço,
Matheus
danctc (2023-03-12 11:11:46+00:00): Olá, muito obrigado!

É que antes estava aparecendo duplicado o nome, um somente Estrada Parque e o outro mencionando Estação no início. Daí alterei a relação para ficar parecido com as outras estações do sistema
cryptickryptos (2023-03-07 06:38:04+00:00): What's with way #1151643179?
Yury Yatsynovich (2023-03-07 16:00:26+00:00): Oops, it was me learning how to use a JOSM plugin "Magic Wand". I've just deleted it
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-06 00:40:17+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/692847909

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ToniE (2023-03-06 19:03:13+00:00): ... zerschossen?

Servus, leider doch. Mag aber auch an iD liegen, der kann "split-of-way" mit Realtionen nicht so gut ab.

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/RP/DE-RP-VRM-Analysis.html#bus_460

Gruß
Toni
Frans S (2023-03-08 11:39:22+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Waterways are no subject to map. Please concentrate on highways and buildings. See the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133344955
SomeoneElse (2023-03-06 01:58:38+00:00): Nothing on the ground (other than the street name) supports the name.
muralito (2023-03-06 16:55:32+00:00): Te hago el review. No estaria correcto porque los poligonos inner y outer comparten aristas.

Aca lo hice como debe ser. Tuve que crear un multipoligono para el barrio, cortar ese perimetro en varia partes y al la relacion que vos hiciste, dejarla con dos "outer" separados.
muralito (2023-03-06 16:55:42+00:00): Ver https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133371870
Calu (2023-03-06 17:13:32+00:00): Ahh, OK. Hice varias canchas con multipolígonos desde que vos me indicaste. Creo que esta fue el único caso en que pasó eso, la mayoría los hice haciendo varias áreas discontinuas entre sí y uniéndolas con la relación. No sé si revisaste esos cambios, pero si ahí también hay errores los puedo corregir yo nomás.
muralito (2023-03-06 18:07:03+00:00): No, no revise ninguno, empece a revisar por los mas nuevos me encontre este con el review=yes y empece por el.
DUGA (2023-03-09 04:12:38+00:00): Let's NOT use any ESRI Clarity (7-10 years behind the reality) to edit Pennsylvania.

Use PEMA instead.
pokey (2023-03-09 14:30:10+00:00): Can you be more specific, please?
DUGA (2023-05-14 13:18:01+00:00): Take a look at layers by yourself.
pokey (2023-05-18 00:30:26+00:00): That's less specific. Thanks anyway.
DUGA (2023-08-03 02:43:22+00:00): Checking further and I can see you added lanes to unpaved roads.

You should not do it, there is no marking on the road indicating two lanes, don't fabricate the information.

Your changeset is full of issues, please carefully check wiki before any submission. Each time I see an issue in this area, it can almost be traced back to this problematic one.
marc__marc (2023-03-13 23:49:02+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1151659977
the ford must haave an highway tag to make it routable
Regards,
Marc
KingVik (2023-03-14 00:23:09+00:00): Thanks for calling my attention
I will fix it up and I have also learned
MxxCon (2023-03-06 09:57:15+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate on your changes to some of these ways? Many of them changed number of lanes from 5 to 4 when satellite imagery clearly shows 5.
Additionally you deleted turn lane tags which are also visible on the satellite imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133346576
mf8s003j (2023-03-06 13:26:35+00:00): Satellite imagery is out of date, plain and simple. Kings Highway was updated recently to remove left turning as an option at several intersections to improve traffic flow.
MxxCon (2023-03-07 00:19:18+00:00): How recently was that change? Do you have this documented somewhere?

I'm looking at street imagery from August 24th 2022 and I'm still seeing 3+2 lane configurations.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133346576
mf8s003j (2023-03-07 00:38:29+00:00): I drove there a few days ago and noticed the changes in the lane paint as well as the *New* sub-sign under the No Left Turns signs visible. That's why there's a "source=survey" tag on the changeset.

You can see the proposed construction here: https://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/kings-hwy-ave-j-e98-st-cb18-jan2021.pdf

You can see here that it was implemented in 2022: https://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/html/about/projects-2022.shtml

If you are looking at free and open street imagery, feel free to link it here. If you're looking at the likely non-open street imagery, there are views from November 2022 that shows it is completed.
MxxCon (2023-03-07 01:11:02+00:00): I saw those dot pages but I don't see where it says that they were implemented. Only that page showing proposals.

But I see Nov imagery and you are correct. It looks like it's starting from Ave J. I'll work on getting it fixed.
mf8s003j (2023-03-07 01:27:47+00:00): The 2022 page mentions "Listed below are the community presentations of NYC DOT projects implemented in 2022".

Rather than you making the changes using Google Street View, which I know you wouldn't do because that's expressly forbidden, why not revert your revert and let my changes stand? Not an ego thing, happy to have you make the changes (I know you do a lot of work in the Brooklyn area) but I based these changes on my own eyes.
MxxCon (2023-03-07 01:55:55+00:00): i didn't let me cleanly revert my revert since i made some edits afterwards. but i submitted 2 edits, one updates lane count and turn lanes and the other turn restrictions
Frans S (2023-03-06 10:25:06+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings here are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Inaccurate mapped and not squared building



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133346588
Glassman (2023-03-06 18:25:54+00:00): Instead of removing the way, why not just change it into a driveway? It exists and should be mapped.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133346692
lounatic (2023-03-06 18:30:43+00:00): agreed. my edit was made in haste and I didn't see how to change to driveway (service->driveway) until this morning.
Glassman (2023-03-06 18:27:16+00:00): Same issue as the last edit - the road actually exists as a driveway and should be mapped that way .
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133346811
lounatic (2023-03-06 18:37:43+00:00): This road actually does end at the gate, which lies within the area, which is why I ended the actual street at the area boundary. I'm not sure I would classify the extension of this street as a driveway since it extends into the area's "parking" area. Perhaps some more detail inside the area is needed though.
Glassman (2023-03-06 20:03:36+00:00): I went ahead and added the gate and a service road. Let me know if this doesn't look right. Also, is 15th Place Northeast the correct name for the street? Douglas County GIS has it as 15th Street Place. See https://gis.douglascountywa.net/portal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=0fe80ac77b224f0c980d4052e946be03
lounatic (2023-03-06 20:14:34+00:00): Good catch. I think perhaps this is technically an alley. No addresses associated with it. The whole length from Eastmont east could be retagged as just a service road all the way to the gate and renamed as 15th Street Place
Glassman (2023-03-06 20:18:18+00:00): I think you are right. I'd leave the street name off unless there is a sign with the name on it. None of the houses have a street address that matches what I saw on the website.
zluuzki (2023-03-06 16:01:14+00:00): -not import

you do realize that you're the one who fcked up reverting and deleted all ways, but not the nodes?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133150994

So stop blaming me for your mess.
And especially: clean it up, there are much more nodes whose outlines were deleted by you.
angys (2023-04-30 18:06:16+00:00): The road section is closed to public, due to landslide incident. please check woth the last editor befor doing such update. This will let those who wish to Genting being navigated to this closed road
TetnuldiPeak (2023-05-03 08:23:05+00:00): Hello angys, thanks for reaching out. I do see in this news article (https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2023/01/867576/batang-kali-genting-highlands-road-reopen-tomorrow-5pm) as well as some others that this highway was reopened to light vehicle and motorcycle traffic on January 6th with a single lane section near the landslide. Based on this, how would you feel about leaving this highway as opened?
angys (2023-05-18 17:55:14+00:00): should be access=private
TetnuldiPeak (2023-05-24 02:27:13+00:00): Thanks for the response. I can agree with access=private here; I have updated the tagging accordingly. Happy mapping!
Johnny Mapperseed (2023-03-06 04:33:32+00:00): Meant OSIP imagery
Johnny Mapperseed (2023-03-06 04:33:24+00:00): Meant OSIP imagery
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 08:59:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Greg_Rose (2023-05-19 05:47:07+00:00): Hi Clay - Was wondering why you're doing this? I understood it was agreed that the railroad name/operator should be prefixed on N American railroad mains - especially with all of the UP/BNSF and CSX/NS parallel lines with identical subdivision names. Would love to know the reasoning behind your changes. Thx
clay_c (2023-05-19 14:07:31+00:00): The operator prefix is a convention we sometimes use where two different operators have nearby lines with the same name. I've left it unchanged in cases like the UP and BNSF Mojave Subdivisions, but only BNSF has a "Scenic Subdivision" in this area, so the operator prefix is not necessary.
ADAC Touristische InfoSysteme (2023-03-09 15:19:41+00:00): Why did you delete all attributes like place=city, names, population?
MxxCon (2023-03-06 10:21:51+00:00): Hello.
There are a number of problems with your edit.
It seems like you accidentally dragged a crosswalk node a few blocks away damaging the map. Please pay attention when you are panning the map around not to do that again.
Additionally, for many features you added addr:state tag. Please note that its value must always be capitalized. Instead of "nj" it must always be "NJ".
Additionally, you incorrectly deleted a valid DD POI and instead added it to an unrelated office building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133349254
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
euroPathfinder (2023-03-06 21:26:02+00:00): Guten Abend Hansalux,
Du hast mit Deinen Änderungen aus dem Radweg eine Landstraße gemacht. Das kann für sowohl Radfahrer als auch Autofahrer gefährlich werden, ich werde diese Änderung wieder rückgängig machen.

Bitte beachte, dass es eine Weile dauern kann bis geänderte Daten übernommen werden. Die Kartendaten sind richtig und die Straße ist korrekt mit der max. zulässigen Geschwindigkeit von 100 km/h hinterlegt. Beachte bitte, dass Kartenupdates je nach Anbieter einige Wochen dauern können. Ich konnte auch nicht herausfinden ob ADAC Drivedot überhaupt mit OSM Daten arbeitet, hast Du dazu eine Quelle?

Viele Grüße
euroPathfinder
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133349448
Branko Kokanovic (2023-03-10 11:24:27+00:00): Ova promena je razvezala bus liniju 503. Da li znate kuda ona trenutno ide možda?
sheldonelectric (2025-04-26 09:20:31+00:00): Hey there, I found a nearby Charge&Go charger 50m away (insane price of 100€), but not this free Mercedes charger... maybe you have misplaced it, or maybe they uninstalled... If you know more about the free charger, please revert and update it.
flohoff (2023-03-06 21:03:47+00:00): Moin,
das hier die Leitungsbrücke als "cover" der Straße zählt bezweifle ich. Das "überdacht" ja nichts. Das geht oben drüber und braucht einen layer. 

Aber den weg trennen halte ich für ziemlichen overkill.

Flo
wies1 (2023-03-07 05:12:52+00:00): Hallo,
habe das covered wieder herausgenommen und die Strasse wieder verbunden. Die Rohrleitung ist von jmd. anderem als "building" gemappt. Wie kann ich hier einen layer anbringen? Oder muss man das Rohr über der Strasse anders mappen? (Bin heute ganztags unterwegs - werde daher deine Antwort erst morgen sehen).
Viele Grüsse
wies1
josmougn (2026-05-31 22:41:08+00:00): Bonsoir,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22750010 .
D'où sort le nom "Ligne de Paris-Montparnasse à Monts (LGV)" ?
Jamais entendu ni vu ce nom nulle part. Tous les panneaux de service vus dans ce secteur portent le nom "L.G.V. Atlantique".
AurélienQ (2026-06-01 08:19:17+00:00): Bonjour,

Ce nom est la désignation officielle de SNCF Réseau, là ou LGV Atlantique est le nom commun. Je t'avoue m'être posé la question duquel mettre à l'attribue "name". J'ai finalement opté pour le nom officiel (qui est le nom courant chez SNCF Réseau), avec "LGV Atlantique" dans l'attribut "alt_name".

Tu trouveras les noms officiels des lignes ferrées en France sur l'OpenData SNCF (je peux te donner le lien si tu veux).
josmougn (2026-06-01 13:44:02+00:00): merci pour l'info.
C'est quand même étrange de la part de la SNCF ce nom "invisible".
AurélienQ (2026-06-01 15:43:52+00:00): Oui et non...
Chaque ligne a un numéro et un nom officiel. Après beaucoup de lignes ne sont connues que par leur surnom (ligne des causses, ligne PLM, ligne des horlogers,...). Que les LGV en aient aussi ne me choque pas. D'autant plus que les surnoms divergent parfois (par exemple : "LGV Paris-Lyon"="LGV Paris-Sud-Est"="LGV Sud-Est-Europpéen"...). 

Mais c'est pour ça que j'ai hésité un peu, sur quels tags vont où (et aujourd'hui je ne suis toujours pas sûr).
hdevine825 (2023-03-10 01:20:13+00:00): Thanks for fixing. I had seen these but hadn't had a chance to go back and clean up.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-06 07:30:27+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3460367708
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/895946336

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MikeN (2023-03-06 22:12:04+00:00): Yes, it appears that most should be paths or sidewalks.    When this changeset was originally made, there was construction to the north that probably migrated some mistaken tagging.
map per (2023-03-06 08:15:26+00:00): Hello AlexRyl,

why did you add an ATM (1) in the ocean?

Something similar already happened in (2) and most of your recent additions were deleted by other mappers indicating that these changes were probably wrong.

If you read this message PLEASE ANSWER. Otherwise I will get in touch with the Data Working Group in the next days and ask them to block your account.

Best regards
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10715715505
(2) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132290235
map per (2023-03-14 19:00:58+00:00): REVERTED
adrianojbr (2023-03-07 17:58:55+00:00): Olá,  Ahaggarplateau!

Você está certo que essa via de ligação existe?

Falei com um mapeador que mora em Itajaí e ele disse que não existe.
Ahaggarplateau (2023-03-09 08:49:23+00:00): Olá Adrianojbr, obrigado por entrar em contato. A configuração das estradas na imagem aérea recente do Maxar Secure Watch apareceu para fornecer acesso entre essas rodovias. No entanto, após uma investigação mais aprofundada das imagens do solo Mapillary de dezembro de 2022, posso ver que você está correto. PatrickySS já fez as revisões em https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133410814 mas obrigado por me avisar. Cumprimentos.


Hello adrianojbr, thank you for reaching out.  The configuration of the roads in the recent aerial image of Maxar Secure Watch appeared to provide access between these highways. However, upon further investigation of the Mapillary ground imagery from December of 2022, I can see that you are correct. PatrickySS has already made the revisions in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133410814 but thank you for letting me know.
Regards.
eggie (2023-10-30 16:02:09+00:00): Ha Jaap,

Denk dat jouw hulp hier even nodig is.
Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143372169#map=18/51.96319/5.81853

MVG
eggie
pesec (2023-03-06 10:15:04+00:00): Добрый день.
Достаточно посмотреть яндекс-панорамы, чтобы увидеть, что между зданиями отсутствуют разрывы. Вы опять нарушили геометрию.
Если указываете корректировку адресов, то и меняйте только её.
Либо указывайте, что меняете здания.
ivanbranco (2023-03-09 17:26:57+00:00): Hi Mattiman69, welcome to OSM,

is there really a park in the middle of the river?

Also please add meaningful changeset comments, "zz" doesn't help anyone.
zstadler (2023-11-28 07:58:16+00:00): שלום
Compositor

תודה על תרומתך לעידכון המפה

על פי כללי המיפוי בארץ, התגית עבור שמות של סינגלים היא
mtb:name
ולא
name

תודה,
זאב
Compositor (2023-11-28 09:04:00+00:00): תודה
איך אפשר למצא את התכונה הזו?
zstadler (2023-11-28 09:15:18+00:00): לוחצים על ה "+" תחת "תגיות" ורושמים
mtb:name
ומצמידים לו את השם

אח"כ מעתיקים את אותו שם גם ל
mtb:name:he
bxl-forever (2023-03-10 21:41:25+00:00): Hello,

access=destination
+ motor_vehicle=destination
+ bicycle=permissive

There might be some cleanup to do here because this is a fairly unlikely combination of tags.

If you mean that the street is restricted to local traffic (C1 sign + a blue sign), then it will be "vehicle=destination" instead of "access=destination".

In such a case, cyclists and horse riders are legally exempted by law, then you might want to add "bicycle=yes" and "horse=yes".

I don’t know why there is "bicycle=permissive", it is very rare outside of the UK, it is primarily aimed at private roads where we assume access is granted.  Not on public roads.

Hope this helps.
trial (2023-03-06 11:53:05+00:00): Bonjour, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8765952945 : je pense qu'il vaut mieux supprimer les pseudos-noms que les traduire.
eggie (2023-03-06 09:34:41+00:00): Nog een tip.. Dit zijn geen parkeerterreinen in de zin van...  We voegen daarom toe parking=street_side orentation=perpendicular. Anders krijg je een wijk vol grote P's.
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2023-03-06 09:35:20+00:00): Dat parkeervakken ook loshouden van de wegdelen svp.
Senihtu (2025-06-02 11:38:59+00:00): Hallo!
In diesem Changeset hast Du zu Relation 15570951 Bus FB-70 (2-6) Bad Nauheim Bahnhof ⇒ Nidderau-Erbstadt Pfaffenhof
not:network:wikidata=Q314042 eingetragen.
Kannst Du Dich noch erinnern warum?

Betreiber der Buslinie ist "Verkehrsgesellschaft Oberhessen mbH" aber sie gehört doch zum RMV-Netzwerk (d.h. dessen Fahrkarten gelten dort)?
Dann wären folgende Einträge richtig:
'network' = 'Rhein-Main-Verkehrsverbund'
'network:short' = 'RMV'
'network:wikidata' = 'Q314042'
Spricht etwas dagegen, den Eintrag mit not zu entfernen und network wie oben zu taggen?

Aber erstmal weiterhin Freude am mappen wünscht
Senihtu
Gino-52 (2025-06-02 12:20:46+00:00): Wahrscheinlich Schreibfehler.
Kannst Du natürlich ruhig ändern.
Senihtu (2025-06-03 10:15:05+00:00): Danke für die Info. Hab die Daten entsprechend geändert.
SekeRob (2023-03-06 08:58:38+00:00): Missed comment: Reduce forest MP by 45 or so inner/outer members sections (combine outlines), map buildings, ways, farming, refine area geometries on ESRI imagery..
map per (2023-03-14 18:59:13+00:00): REVERTED (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133351373)
vasony (2023-04-02 17:41:31+00:00): Szia!

Mi van az utcatáblán? Mert már 3x lett oda vissza cserélve.

Tamás
vzolee (2023-04-03 06:07:21+00:00): Madách Imre út a helyes
vasony (2023-04-03 09:56:51+00:00): Értem hogy ez a helyes, de ha nem ez van a táblán, akkor vissza fogják írni, ezért kérdem.
vzolee (2023-04-03 11:34:23+00:00): Ez van a táblán.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-06 09:10:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2176657636
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549157193

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-06-07 13:43:00+00:00): Beste RIG   Nier elke kruising is een highway=crossing  Staan hier strepen op de weg?

MVG
eggie
Reisinformatiegroep (2024-06-14 09:59:37+00:00): Hoi Eggie ik zie dat de aanpassing alweer een jaar geleden is gedaan maar ik heb mijn wijziging gecheckt en een paar aanpassingen doorgevoerd
eggie (2024-06-14 10:30:26+00:00): 👍
eggie (2023-03-06 09:29:32+00:00): Dag BVerburg.
Alle begin is moeilijk 
Tip Let op dat je de paden niet vastplakt aan de landuse. Wanneer je de linker alttoets gebruikt bij intekenen plakken de paden niet.
Ik heb wat losgemaakt. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133354270
MVG
eggie
38446 (2023-03-20 16:30:48+00:00): Den in diesem Changeset angelegten "Zamocky park" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1151912901) bitte wieder löschen; der Park ist mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/188764 bereits kartiert.
Pavol33 (2023-03-20 19:17:27+00:00): Danke, erledigt