piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jordi MF (2023-11-12 15:15:25+00:00): Hola,

Concorde en què els llocs "place" és millor mapejar-los amb un sol node. En aquest cas, vaig reutilitzar l'historial sense molestar-me a corregir-lo bé. Afegiré un node d'Urbanova al centre del barri.

Tampoc sóc massa partidari d'utiltizar "name" junt als "landuse=residential" ja que crec que no un etiquetatge recomanat per la wii o per la comunitat (no ho recorde). Però en este punt no tinc clar com caldria mapejar els complexos residencials que hi ha en Urbanova.

Urbanova és un barri oficial, mentre que m'imagine que "Urbanova 1, 2, 3 i 4" són els noms que reben els complexos residencials interns. No crec que hagen de tindre la categoria de "neighbourhood" perquè no tenen categoria de barri oficial en Alacant. Entenc que són llos similars a una urbanització. Per tant, quina altra etiqueta podríem utilitzar, "place=city_block"?
La wiki espanyola proposa mapejar les urbanitzacions amb landuse=residential  name=* (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Objetos_que_generan_dudas_en_Espa%C3%B1a#U). Sé que contradiu la recomanació de la wiki espanyola, però quasi sempre he fet cas a la wiki espanyola.

Salutacions
Hugoren Martinako (2023-11-13 10:28:12+00:00): Concorde també que el millor etiquetatge pels elements interiors hauría de ser "place=city_block". Sense inflar-se el cap massa (a la fi, no són elements importants), canviaria els landuses per city_block i au.

Sobre la wikipedia, no m'agrada la definició. He revisat l'historic i va ser afegida per dcapillae al 2018, però no té cap discussió associada. Faré algún comentari.

Gràcies per canviar-ho
Barroszt (2023-11-08 22:44:54+00:00): obszary dróg dla 4. Pułku Lotniczego ulica w Toruniu: 1 na około 850
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-06 22:50:27+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8988096450

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SekeRob (2023-11-08 09:04:46+00:00): Hi

It would be good to state WHY this revert!

thanks a bunch
Tatti Barletta (2023-11-08 09:09:04+00:00): I did in the original changeset to inform the author :)
SekeRob (2023-11-08 09:24:57+00:00): Better do it in yours so those who see the CS revert don't have to discover the link first and drill in ;O)

thanks.
MxxCon (2023-11-09 20:07:55+00:00): Hello.
Where is this information coming from?
As far as I can see Grand Central Terminal has a different address.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143713434
MxxCon (2023-11-09 20:09:49+00:00): Hello.
Please note that crosswalks in NYC are generally covered in asphalt. It's extremely rare for them to be made of concrete.
Please map ONLY features that you personally observed or know exact details of. Otherwise, imaginary mapping is considered vandalism and can result in reverts or account ban.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143713447
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-06 23:30:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11330111264
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215526310

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
habi (2023-11-20 19:32:40+00:00): Ciao MappSurfer
Du erwähnst hier als Quelle Google Maps.
Google verbietet in den Nutzungsbedingungen explizit, deren Daten für andere Karten zu übernehmen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google
Das ist aus Urheberrechtsgründen nicht erlaubt.

Es ist ebenfalls nicht üblich historisch bestehende Gebäude neu einzutragen, wie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1221636456/, in OpenStreetMap erfassen wir Dinge, die in der Realität existieren, alles Ehemalige gehört in OpenHistoricalMap.org
In Spezialfällen, wenn das Gebäude abgerissen ist, aber noch auf den Luftfotos zu sehen ist, kann dieses mit `demolished:building=*` erfasst werden.

Gruss,
habi
habi (2023-11-26 19:53:50+00:00): Kannst du sagen, was aus diesem Changeset von Google Maps stammt?
Evtl. könnte das Ding dann einzeln revertiert werden, ansonsten müsste eigentlich das gesamte Changeset rückgängig gemacht werden...
MappSurfer (2023-11-29 07:18:16+00:00): Hallo habi
Leider weiss ich gerade nicht mehr, was ich von GoogleMaps habe. 
Wenn du mir sagst, ob und wie ich einen Änderungssatz löschen kann, kümmere ich mich in Kürze darum.
Liebe Grüsse
MappSurfer
habi (2023-11-30 20:50:56+00:00): *in globo* kann ein Changeset am einfachsten mit https://revert.monicz.dev rückgängig gemacht werden.
Dort einfach Changesetnummer (hier 143713603) eingeben, Kommentar dazu und ab die Post.

Wenn du weisst, was von wo kommt, dann könnte mit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter auch nur ein Teil revertiert werden.
MappSurfer (2023-12-03 10:52:11+00:00): Hallo habi
Jetzt ist mir soeben wieder eingefallen, welche Daten ich von Google benutzt habe: Ganz einfach, es waren nur die Abfahrpläne am Bahnhof Grenchen Süd, Bahnhof. Und diese darf ich, so weit ich weiss, ja verwenden. Und wenn nicht, dann nehme ich die Daten eben von bgu.ch, der offiziellen Website der Busbetriebe Grenchen und Umgebung, wobei sich diese aber nicht von denjenigen von Google unterscheiden sollten.
Liebe Grüsse
MappSurfer
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:35:48+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 139030764, 139032261, 139056613, 139066343, 139216780, 139217362.
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:36:38+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 143677188, 143677341, 143698359, 143699422.
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:38:02+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 142999020, 143023859, 143024086, 143025664, 143026504, 143027101, 143028920, 143029860, 143030252, 143030789, 143031994, 143033879, 143046861, 143598918, 143599041, 143599153, 143601731, 143623661, 143657763, 143661583, 143667468, 143668516.
kartler175 (2023-11-07 13:02:09+00:00): Und was jetzt? Reparieren?
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=13.02115&lat=47.30151&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
woodpeck (2023-11-07 13:10:08+00:00): Erstmal abwarten. Ich denke, ich werde noch ein bisschen mehr löschen müssen.
whammo (2023-11-06 23:51:52+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/whammo for description
whammo (2023-11-06 23:52:04+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/whammo for description
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:52:38+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112265463, 112354670, 112355030, 112355721, 112384540, 112399924, 112426051, 138476828, 140554603, 140555408, 140556250, 140556730, 140559486, 140603901, 140616263, 141881019, 141926082, 141927164, 141937280, 141941762, 141964585, 141966347, 141967374, 142550122, 142592229, 142602916, 142603665, 143068300.
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:55:53+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 110934730, 111249160, 111253842, 111254219, 111450162, 111659963, 112090478, 112091596, 112093314, 112094457, 112137217, 113089602, 138602244, 139448521, 139452637, 139465219, 140653783, 140661278, 140698162, 140736448, 141390655, 141391310, 142065201, 142104669.
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:56:39+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 139585406, 139593308, 139621962, 139630947, 139631976, 139632242, 139632443, 139632623, 139638962, 139639103, 139639452, 139639527, 139655447, 139664816, 139666981, 139667047, 139677941, 139677945, 139688063, 139708612, 140538192, 140538563, 140538709, 141572055, 141572873, 141578072, 141974318, 141997041, 141997377, 141998133, 141998462, 141998685, 141999739, 142002319, 142002437, 142002998, 142004079, 142040244, 142062857, 142064628, 142989982, 142998317.
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:58:43+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112182876, 112276393, 112312764, 112328319, 113204622, 113205012, 120795177, 120798570, 120800522, 120804410, 120806105, 120807523, 120808976, 120809351, 120810729, 120846461, 120850653, 120851588, 120852815, 120855016, 120866178, 120867743, 120901212, 120901394, 138251402, 138474754, 138781686, 138786092, 138829127, 138839327, 138839355, 138840690, 138851274, 138910240, 139270801, 139280672, 139305177, 139307527, 139308699, 139310183, 139316026, 139318137, 139327262, 139362232, 139362839, 139373736, 139407467, 139414413, 139421732, 139580218, 139584323, 139584650, 139584909.
mucx (2024-04-10 07:25:39+00:00): Hallo, nachdem hier offfenbar ein größeres Stück Wald zwischen Farnbichel im SW und Vorderkrimmel im NO fehlt (bei OpenTopoMap Stand 13.03.2024 ist es noch drin) bin ich auf dieses Changeset gestoßen. Offenbar wurde hier etwas korrigiert. Kann es sein, dass der Wald dabei verloren gegangen ist? Lässt sich das Polygon von irgendwo her wiederherstellen?
mucx (2024-04-10 08:21:32+00:00): Ah, sorry mir ist grad aufgefallen, dass ich mich beim Datum des Changesets vertan habe. Das liegt ja vor dem Stand bei der OpenTopoMap... Kann es trotzdem einen Zusammenhang mit den Korrekturen hier geben? Und gäbe es eine Möglichkeit die Daten wiederherzustellen?
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:58:28+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 138558598, 138558674, 138817954, 138818138, 139534379, 139534568, 139558327, 140506729, 140507973, 140508388, 140514910, 140831512, 140854959, 140856822, 141223566, 141227295, 141228032, 141278639.
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:59:38+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 141229085, 141231408, 141237290, 141237296, 141238942, 141283709, 141436182, 141438870, 141440576, 141441268, 141442674, 141444146, 141444268, 142269773, 142445233, 142446968, 142447561, 142452550, 142718985, 142720936, 142727154, 142728538, 142729641, 142741468, 142741674, 142771960, 142772330.
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-07 00:01:35+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 141080041, 141090738, 141178273, 141178805, 141179387, 141189622, 141213757, 141579868, 141586012, 141586354, 141605921, 141633791, 141634351, 141636155, 141637032, 141639461, 141661542, 141663039, 141667329, 141667867, 142164362, 142164698, 142164902, 142171000, 143069365, 143069792, 143069983, 143073546, 143180184, 143181673, 143184835, 143192757, 143327190, 143328137, 143331478.
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-07 00:02:03+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 140921706, 140938181, 140938356, 140999355, 141009907, 141011084, 141077335.
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-07 00:02:57+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 141531941, 141746711, 141747293, 141756579, 141794703, 141799441, 143278124, 143279854.
user_14383439 (2023-11-10 16:31:43+00:00): Dieses Changeset wurde per https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143870822 einem aktiven Account zugewiesen.
Graptemys (2023-11-15 19:39:50+00:00): Hi Jacob, welcome to the OpenStreetMap community and thanks for mapping bicycle parking in this area! I see you requested a review for this change.

The only issue is that the bicycle parking nodes should be separate and next to the sidewalk way. Also the access=yes tag is not necessary as that is the default.

Also, I noticed you added some parking lanes in other changesets. If you want to map this information, it can be more easily added to the highway object itself using the parking:lane=* tag. A separate way would only be necessary in a parking lot or if there was some physical barrier between the road and the parking.

Let me know if you have any questions about this!
user_5359 (2023-11-08 13:18:56+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/11330225537 (one of ten objects). what is the mean of the tag kato:user =  yes?
Noro Hibu (2023-11-08 13:56:06+00:00): Hello. KATO is a national classifier of settlements in Kazakhstan. Due to the lack of information, this is perhaps the only complete official source about official settlements. Sometimes it happens that it does not always manage to be updated on time and for some reason it contains settlements that no longer visually exist on the ground. Therefore, the main purpose of the kato:user=yes is to distinguish official former settlements from other named localities. Also, if in one administrative unit there are 2 settlements with the same name, then kato:user=[ID] helps to distinguish them. This scheme is also used in Russia with similar oktmo:user=yes.
Noro Hibu (2023-11-08 14:01:02+00:00): This helps avoid double mapping and loss of settlements on map if someone decides to use KATO as a source and notices that some places are missing from the map.
user_5359 (2023-11-16 18:15:09+00:00): From the point of view of understanding for all users (and not only in Kazakhstan), a tag source=KATO would be better. If you also want to note the numbering, a ref.KZ:kato for the number would make sense.
citrula (2023-11-08 01:53:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You can press "Q" when mapping to square corners. This is useful for mapping building outlines since most of them have square corners.
Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143715571
user_11609320 (2023-11-07 01:49:21+00:00): a lot of the farm yards in this region are illegal indoor marijuana groves. not sure how to mark them.
Matt_ (2023-11-07 02:07:21+00:00): Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_National_Inventory_of_Dams
Glassman (2023-11-07 21:37:23+00:00): Can you explain what you are trying to accomplish?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143716362
Glassman (2023-11-07 21:37:32+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143716362
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-08 00:11:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 143758526 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by LostLooker916 that were at least partially offensive and incorrect
citrula (2023-11-08 01:47:28+00:00): Hi, a node is not correct in addition to the area that you already mapped before. You must choose one or the other!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143716547
mcliquid (2023-11-07 07:47:55+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-08 00:11:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 143758526 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by LostLooker916 that were at least partially offensive and incorrect
Glassman (2023-11-07 21:51:58+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143717270
Glassman (2023-11-07 21:52:35+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143717270
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-08 00:11:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 143758526 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by LostLooker916 that were at least partially offensive and incorrect
Multi Pass (2023-11-07 03:58:15+00:00): Hi,

Huntingfield is already defined by the suburb relation, if that was your intention.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10627568

And residential=suburban is not a recognised tag.
Glassman (2023-11-07 22:09:58+00:00): Why did you remove the Skagit Valley College campus? The college still lists the campus on their website. Can you review this edit and add it back as needed?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143717377
Glassman (2023-11-07 21:52:33+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143717457
Glassman (2023-11-07 21:52:31+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143717665
felipeeugenio (2026-02-24 20:41:49+00:00): Hola Marcelo. Si los terrenos están pegados; dibujarlos pegados. Lo hice yo.

saludos
citrula (2023-12-07 17:52:58+00:00): Hello Reynard Oinomel, I have reverted your edits because they do not seem to be based in reality (fictitious mapping of parks). These edits impact everyone who uses the map, so please be careful in the future!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144875645
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:24:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174064933 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18849
habi (2023-11-09 10:04:07+00:00): In this changeset you've added a bunch of duplicated buildings over already existing data.
Please refrain from doing so!
gscholz (2023-11-11 10:08:37+00:00): Hi OSM08WVL,
can you please cleanup the mess you created?
Kind regards
Guido
fe60 (2023-11-07 05:27:09+00:00): https://bernau-live.de/nachrichten/verkehr/bauarbeiten/bernau-vollsperrung-der-boernicker-chaussee-bis-august-2024
mcliquid (2023-11-07 07:47:46+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Allison P (2023-11-07 16:51:00+00:00): "Mango Tree" is not a name. It is the species
mcliquid (2023-11-07 07:47:36+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143719602
François2 (2024-05-27 21:10:45+00:00): Hi!
I would like to add the inside corridors of this mall to make the rendering cleaner on indoorequal. 
Could you help me ?
itineris (2024-04-18 11:03:45+00:00): Szia!

Szerkesztés előtt kérlek, a FÖMIhez képest igazítsd be a kedvenc légifelvételed, hogy az épületeket ne elcsúszva rajzold be, illetve ne húzd félre az addig pontos(abb) utakat!

Köszönöm:
Ákos
jtracey (2023-11-07 17:08:53+00:00): Please try to use meaningful changeset comments, so other mappers can quickly tell what you're changing. :)
citrula (2023-11-08 01:45:53+00:00): hi, in this edit you deleted the pedestrian crossing nodes that were already there. Was this intentional?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143720147
deepikja (2023-11-10 20:05:24+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing the edit and notifying us about the improper modifications. These changes were done by the editors in accordance with our internal SOP. We apologize for the incorrect edits flown into OSM from our end. I have restored the previous existing edits supporting the ground reality in the changeset ID # 143877859.
We will re-examine all of the changesets in which the team has updated traffic signal/stop sign attributes, and rectify them by 11/16. We will also work on updating the SOP to be followed while adding these attributes on public OSM which align with the community guidelines/OSM wiki.
Regards,
Deepika
aceman444 (2025-09-25 21:06:42+00:00): Dakujem, treba zadat aj typ obchodu, alebo aspon znacku fixme.
vlakos555 (2025-09-26 13:17:23+00:00): ja som tam bol pred 2 rokmi na prechádzke, objavil som to tam, ale nevedel som čo to je. Ďakujem za office=consulting
user_11609320 (2023-11-07 06:32:35+00:00): the karens complained and got the road closed down. so there is no point to mark it as tertiary if it only carries bikes and emergency vehicles. I was 16 the last time vehicles went down highland and Fairmont
nevw (2023-11-07 08:28:23+00:00): Mate, where has Diddilibah Road gone!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-26.6423/153.0358
nevw (2023-11-07 08:39:52+00:00): I added highway=tertiary to Diddillibah Road to allow it to render on the map and aligned with Esri imagery.
user_11609320 (2023-11-07 06:49:24+00:00): only carries local residential traffic. no longer a secondary road. Victoria street handles more traffic than this street
silversurfer83 (2023-11-07 07:33:00+00:00): Moin :)

wo du grad da an der Schwanenstr. warst: Hast du eine Ahnung was mit dem Übergang der genannten Str über die Gleise ist? Da ist in der Karte aktuell eine Lücke, jedoch nirgends ein "note" oder ähnliches, was die Lücke erklären würde.  

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143721934
Cowboy79 (2023-11-07 09:44:45+00:00): Es ist alles korrekt und aktuell und eine Änderung (Wiedereröffnung des Bahnübergangs) ist auch für die Zukunft nicht geplant.