piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hung Tran 9x0 (2026-05-22 09:21:33+00:00): Phố Hàng Cót cấm đi ngược chiều đoạn bốt Hàng Đậu. Bạn để nhiều thẻ oneway ngoại lệ như vậy là sai rồi.
Hung Tran 9x0 (2026-05-22 09:22:08+00:00): Bạn vui lòng sửa lại cho đúng nhé. Ở đây cắm biển cấm đi ngược chiều rất rõ ràng.
Hung Tran 9x0 (2026-05-22 13:51:02+00:00): Có vẻ bạn chưa online, vậy tôi sẽ sửa lại nhé. Mong bạn sau này sẽ cẩn thận hơn khi tạo chỉnh sửa, chứ đừng sửa lung tung theo ý muốn.
QuiLe (2026-05-13 02:03:23+00:00): QuiLe is wondering why schobbish is writing in third-person.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182578384
DFW-Backyard7 (2026-05-13 02:20:26+00:00): DFW-Backyard7 was inspired by the desire to create a changeset comment that offers a world-class sarcasm experience executed to the highest mapping standards
schobbish (2026-05-13 03:15:09+00:00): Schobbish appreciates your comments and is now making the mandatory reply to keep replies at 100%.
FajrAl (2026-05-13 11:13:56+00:00): Kau yakin keduanya itu RTH?
BidgeeWagga (2026-05-31 10:33:30+00:00): Do you have any local knowledge? As there is currently no way to make a right hand turn due to a temp island.
user_5359 (2026-05-15 10:03:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please describe the object. The name of a object with description is useless.
eggie (2026-05-13 06:46:11+00:00): Hoi,

Straten die nog niet opgeleverd zijn heb ik op construction gezet.
Eigenlijk tekenen we geen plannen in.. wel mooi ingetekend.
Ik heb een verzoek gedaan via het forum tot import van de nieuwe woningen.
Huidige situatie 
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@53.00301,6.060269,18/?datastrip=20260421_SVNEO-02&sensorname=SuperView-NEO

MVG
eggie
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-20 01:30:00+00:00): Reverted due to being a SEO spam POI added by SEO spam account with SEO spam description and other tags

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182903879
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-20 13:17:21+00:00): Since the user actually replied unlike most SEO accounts, I'm happy to be more specific about the issues here.

If you're going to promote businesses to OSM, either your own or your clients, you at the very least have an obligation to at least make every reasonable effort to use correct tags and values, given you are doing this professionally and for financial gain. Many of the tags added here are used incorrectly (which just following iD's guidance or spending a minute or two reading the wiki would have made clear), which both pollutes the map with junk data and means they will not be intelligible to data consumers reading the map, defeating the purpose of your efforts here. Specifically, addr:country=*,  description=*, image=* (which is an arguably invalid tag to begin with) and phone=* all have invalid values. Furthermore, the description=* tag is blatant self-promotional nonsense that has no place on OpenStreetMap.

However, while you could fix these issues when re-adding the POI, the bigger issue here is that it doesn't belong on the map to begin with. The address you've given is that of TX Registered Agent (which I know because I use the same service for my LLC); there is no actual business office at this location, it is merely a mailing address. As there is no physically verifiable on the ground feature, nor an actual point of interest for map users to visit, there is nothing to map for the purposes of OpenStreetMap, which is a map of the real world not merely a business listing directory (as your block message reminded you).
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-20 13:18:33+00:00): (Also, I didn't mention all the nonsense tags on the changeset itself)
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-21 05:21:52+00:00): DWG revert - apparent online only business

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182956240
旧加卷 (2026-05-13 07:06:41+00:00): 桥梁不是涉水路面
Wildsharky (2026-05-15 09:17:26+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:182679744
Wildsharky (2026-05-15 09:15:02+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:182678213
Solaris07 (2026-06-09 03:55:59+00:00): Just so you know, the tag place=locality indicates that the place has no population (as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=locality). That doesn't apply in this case as Allandale has a population of 68. I've changed it to place=hamlet for you, but it's best to keep this in mind in the future.
Wildsharky (2026-05-15 09:20:27+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:182685644
FajrAl (2026-07-07 05:19:10+00:00): Beberapa datanya ada yang rangkap.
NaufalFarras (2026-05-17 10:28:35+00:00): Halo, mohon jangan duplikasi jalan yang sudah ada
eggie (2026-05-13 06:27:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NieWnen (2026-05-13 18:17:42+00:00): Proszę, nigdy nie usuwaj budynków, żeby dodać je ponownie. To nieprawidłowe.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

W dodatku zostały usunięte inne tagi + adres.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-13 04:21:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390817357

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-05-14 13:01:12+00:00): Hi!

Please use access=private for private roads. access=no is for very strong no-access roads like closed roads or military/secret facilities. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate#Relation_to_access=no

Thanks!
FajrAl (2026-05-13 10:24:01+00:00): OpenStreetMap bukan tempat untuk bercanda. Petakan objek dengan yang ada di lapangan, bukan kejadian.
vrix (2026-05-14 04:25:27+00:00): Could you please double check your recent changesets involving the Gainesville relation (R119734)?

The relation can't be found on Nominatim anymore, which leads me to believe that something's wrong https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=R&osmid=119734
rdzik (2026-05-31 10:59:35+00:00): Budynek nie znajduje się w Przemyślu, a w Krównikach, dodatkowo umieszczony przez Ciebie adres jest nieparzysty, mimo znajdowania się po parzystej stronie ulicy. Przywracam adres krównicki.
Wildsharky (2026-05-15 09:22:09+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:182682191
ClaveScottPH (2026-06-04 06:10:03+00:00): You shouldn't added that these kind of  boundaries. (Not allowed)
TriangleMaple (2026-05-13 05:27:07+00:00): If these edits are OK, I'll continue mapping the city's neighbourhood boundaries in a week or so.
Evan Boyer (2026-05-15 18:53:03+00:00): Hi there Wildsharky - I know it appeared as though I created duplicate 811 Main buildings in 2D, however my intention was to add detail for the 3D building model by stacking multiple building shapes on top of each other as I did for Heritage Plaza and Texas Tower. I'm happy to relate them all together or make other changes - if you have better ideas on how to best depict our complex shaped buildings in 3D form as seen on sites like these - https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=29.7569178&lon=-95.3655907&zoom=18&camera.theta=67.059&camera.phi=117.066. Also, the min-height of the shape you kept is for the top portion, so it is technically floating in mid-air right now. Happy to discuss further!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-16 12:57:33+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and explicit source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184180919

https://osm.org/changeset/184180919
FajrAl (2026-05-13 10:25:00+00:00): Jangan memasukkan informasi kepemilikan
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-13 06:00:18+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
are the following names real?
eppy apt (1108456338), v2
Japanese school sports pitch (1480323114), v2
NeisRevert (2026-07-12 12:30:19+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/185588970
Comment: "Remove vandalism"
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-13 05:56:19+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
is the following name real?
El bongo (360818473), v6
one_half_3544 (2026-07-12 12:24:38+00:00): of course not - reverted
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-12 12:28:02+00:00): Thanks @one_half_3544

Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185588662
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-13 05:57:01+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
is this place real?
NeisRevert (2026-07-12 12:29:22+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/185588931
Comment: "Remove vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-05-13 06:12:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/182583871
where the comment is: "Undo mass deletion"
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-13 06:17:25+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
is the following name real?
Rio dejenairo (621867559), v8
eggie (2026-05-13 06:30:39+00:00): Dag Rob,

Beter niet de straat op motor_vehicle-no zetten.
Wel is het zaak om een paaltje toe te voegen.
Dat is voldoende. Nu worden ook moped en mofa gestopt.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-05-13 06:33:52+00:00): Ik heb motor_vehicle=no verwijderd. Dat is echt niet correct. Wat was het probleem hier. Dat paaltje staat al drie jaar op de kaart en staat getagd als verwijderbaar voor bv hulpdiensten.

MVG
eggie
RobGeraedts (2026-05-13 06:42:12+00:00): Holl Eggie,

bedankt voor de correctie. Ik zag het paalje staan, maar ik werd gisteren door een Valhalla-gebaseerde routeplanner dat straatje ingestuurd. Vandaar dat ik op zoek was naar een verbetering.
eggie (2026-05-13 06:48:22+00:00): Oke...Zeker weten dat je instelling goed staat voor auto?
Valhalla doet het nl goed.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_car&route=51.177838%2C5.964232%3B51.177779%2C5.964702

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-05-13 06:49:15+00:00): Op fiets- en voetganger routeert het uiteraard wel langs het paaltje.
RobGeraedts (2026-05-13 08:01:06+00:00): Bedankt Eggie. Moet aan onze instellingen liggen!
eggie (2026-05-13 08:04:52+00:00): Of aan die app. ? In dat geval een berichtje naar de app bouwer.
Er zijn wel meer routers die door paaltjes rijden.
RobGeraedts (2026-05-13 08:11:03+00:00): Haha, dat zijn we zelf. We bouwen momenteel een routerings app en zoeken naar het juiste algoritme, vandaar.
eggie (2026-05-13 08:13:21+00:00): 😀
eggie (2026-05-13 08:16:50+00:00): Kijk even hier welke defaulttags op een paaltje staan.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-13 06:11:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1819776310
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1512833347

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-13 06:16:32+00:00): Well, that looks strange with all that mapped motorway's here ...
eggie (2026-05-13 06:28:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-13 06:31:13+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13823306559

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Wildsharky (2026-05-15 09:19:51+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:182681551
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 09:51:40+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, possibly sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184128655

https://osm.org/changeset/184128655
robryk (2026-06-23 21:31:06+00:00): Hi,

it seems to me that this is in error. TTBOMK these traffic lights have the Zurich-standard vibrating signal for the blind and no acoustic signal.

Assuming you agree with me: I've found many traffic lights in Zürich labelled (IMO incorrectly) as having sound signals via StreetComplete, so I would hope that we can make some change to how the question is presented in StreetComplete to make such errors less likely. Could you describe your thought process when answering this question and maybe suggest what would have made it clearer what answer to give?

Cheers,
Robert
topius (2026-05-13 13:54:00+00:00): Hi Marcool04, 
Islands are notoriously at the wrong place all over PNG. Someone once imported all island names from a GNS database once with the Note "please check my location". The location was often very imprecise. And sometimes spelling is different. My guess is that Sontamatia Island is a colonial spelling for Nusantaumatai Island, and so I combined the two, with Sontamatia als alternate name. Nelia Island might have disappeared in the meantime. 
Cheers, 
topius
Marcool04 (2026-05-13 18:00:22+00:00): Hi Topius,
Thanks for checking on my edits! Right, that explains it then. I understand your reasoning and that does make sense. But I'm not sure that Sontamatia is really an alternate for Nusantaumatai. Nowadays, I know with no ambiguity that Nusantaumatai is that small fleck that has a couple of houses on it (and which is in fact partly artificial). One of those houses belongs to a guy I know quite well, Kenny, and I often stop by at his place on my way to Metevoe. But on the old US Army map (https://nla.gov.au/nla.obj-232802512/view ) both Sontamatia and Nsuantaumatai are marked, although the locations they are supposed to be pointing to are very unclear and clearly just wrong. And on that map, there is no Neila at all...
Cheers,
Mark.
rajdhani (2026-05-15 04:08:47+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 182677810
旧加卷 (2026-05-13 07:08:34+00:00): 是什么就画什么，没有与水道交汇的道路不要连在一起。露天水道不要画成下水道。
TrickyFoxy (2026-05-14 16:29:57+00:00): 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении
Tjuro (2026-06-23 04:26:45+00:00): Beste 10-NHN-DKraijer,

Ik zie dat je hier emergency=yes aan het toevoegen bent, over het algemeen word dit gezien als foutief.

Ik vraag jou te verdiepen in het in kaart brengen en dit te vertalen naar alle mogelijke tags die wij hebben.

Hiervoor hebben wij een wiki, mocht je daar er niet uit komen dan kan je terecht op het forum.

Maar emergency=yes/no is niet een oplossing voor de lange termijn.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
10-NHN-DKraijer (2026-06-23 08:41:16+00:00): Hallo Tjuro, we zijn bekend met de Wiki. Ervaring leert ook dat het anders niet goed (genoeg) werkt dus als je tips hebt hoe we dit beter kunnen verwerken dan hoor ik het graag.  Deze situatie komt vaker voor dus als we het beter kunnen doen dan graag.
Frans S (2026-05-26 10:31:39+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
About multi story buildings:
Check this video.
For buildings with a few floors, start watching from position 1 minute. 
https://youtu.be/Tpi-BTMVo1M
https://youtu.be/dsfUcslLtVc?si=bEHwRl1sxDI_GA0H
eggie (2026-05-13 07:41:09+00:00): Ik heb nog even de note= apart ingevoerd en de tag bicycle=no aangepast.
Daar was wat fout gegaan.
Zie je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=182586172

MVG
eggie
Vasil Kyosev (2026-05-13 07:29:16+00:00): Аз съм местен, от гр.Черноморец. От дете минавам по тези пътища с колело. използвам различни приложения за колоездене. Искам да допринеса за обновяването на картите, като добавям нови пътища, добре познати и юесто използвани от МПС-та, колоездачи и пешеходци. Поради тази причина добавям нови пътища. Искам подробна карта на района, която ще е от полза за много хора.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-13 07:41:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373824765

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-13 07:41:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227636780

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Kookykooky (2026-05-13 13:07:30+00:00): thanks, repaired #mapycom :)
burrscurr (2026-05-13 17:00:22+00:00): Hallo paulkos,

danke für deinen Beitrag zu OSM und herzlich Willkommen! Access-Tagging kann manchmal etwas knifflig sein... kannst du z.B. mit der Seite https://trafficsigns.osm-verkehrswende.org/DE noch mal prüfen, ob die Werte der Tags access,motor_vehicle,bus,bicycle und foot der Beschilderung entsprechen?  foot=no ist denke so nicht richtig (die Zugangsberechtigungen gelten meistens auch für die angrenzenden Fußwege, es sei denn, die sind separat kartiert). Weißt du, welches Schild hier steht?

Viele Grüße
burrscurr
paulkos (2026-05-13 19:53:19+00:00): Hallo burrscurr,

ja, da habe ich ein bisschen geschummelt — zu Fuß kommt man dort natürlich durch. Es sind aber Straßenbahngleise, und die Fußwege verlaufen links und rechts daneben.

Vor der Haltestelle hängt das Zeichen „vorgeschriebene Vorbeifahrt rechts“ (weißer Pfeil schräg nach rechts unten auf blauem Grund). An der nächsten Kreuzung stehen dann „Vorfahrt gewähren“, „rechts abbiegen“ und noch einmal „rechts vorbeifahren“.

Ich habe das überhaupt erst bemerkt, weil der Navigator vorgeschlagen hat, unter diesem Zeichen durchzufahren.

Ich weiß nicht genau ob ich einen Link von google teilen darf.  
https://maps.app.goo.gl/yunSEf3DvqviPcfm7

Viele Grüße
Paul
Vasil Kyosev (2026-05-13 07:44:45+00:00): Районът се използва за отглеждане на коне и крави. Не може свободно преминаване. Имотът е частен. След като навлязох с колетото се оказа, юе изхода е през местна ферма на собственика на земята, който не е достъпен за автомобили, а само пеша или с велосипед.
Udarian (2026-05-13 12:15:14+00:00): Hello thoughtmarketing,
the changeset comment left on this changeset is not the best as "-" doesn't really tell anyone looking at the changeset what the changeset actually does. Good changeset comments are important for future reference for other contributors when reviewing the history of an object and for those reviewing changes that happen within a specific region. Good changeset comments dont have to be long or complicated, just describe what you have done, for example "added a advertising agencies office" would have been more than sufficient for this changeset. 
For more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments .

Happy mapping,
Udar.
MarcoR (2026-05-13 08:50:35+00:00): Questa modifica è sbagliata: l'appartamento è visitabile (io l'ho fatto insieme ad altre persone e alla guida turistica qualche giorno fa).

Perché ti ostini a modificare erroneamente la casa natale di Amedeo Modigliani?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182587460
mapcontroller (2026-05-13 09:21:50+00:00): Non metto in dubbio che sia visitabile occasionalmente su prenotazione.
Il punto è la classificazione: per essere indicato come “museo” secondo le linee guida servono fonti istituzionali che lo classifichino come tale.
MarcoR (2026-05-13 10:22:31+00:00): Quali sono le linee guida di cui parli?

Hai tolto altre informazioni oltre al tag tourism=museum (le informazioni di contatto, gli orari di apertura, il sito web, etc.) e hai aggiunto nuovamente access=private + landuse=residential (che non c'entra niente).

Secondo me confondi l'oggetto "edificio" con l'appartamento che si trova al suo interno: sono due cose separate e l'uno può essere privato mentre l'altro può benissimo essere aperto al pubblico.

A mio avviso qua vale il principio del "Duck tagging" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Duck_tagging): se si tratta di un luogo chiuso visitabile con una guida turistica e contiene al suo interno oggetti che ricordano e/o riguardano una persona, un tema culturale/scientifico/naturale, allora si può identificare come museo.

La cosa strana è che non ha un orario di apertura ed è visitabile solo su appuntamento o in alcuni giorni decisi dalla guida turistica (e segnalati su Facebook) ma su OpenStreetMap esistono parecchi altri casi di musei aperti solo su appuntamento: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2pJj

Per dire, anche in alcuni ristoranti, soprattutto quelli stellati, ci si va solo dopo aver prenotato, eppure sono comunque mappati come "ristoranti".

Quale altro tag useresti per un oggetto simile? E non stiamo parlando dell'edificio...

La cosa più vicina è historic=memorial ma i monumenti stanno all'esterno e sono visitabili senza guida turistica, quindi anche in questo caso useresti un tag poco appropriato.
mapcontroller (2026-05-13 13:04:36+00:00): Il mio dubbio riguarda piuttosto la classificazione dell’oggetto come tourism=museum.
Il principio del duck tagging secondo me qui non basta da solo: in OSM normalmente un museo è un luogo stabilmente organizzato per la visita pubblica, con un minimo di accessibilità prevedibile e verificabile. In questo caso invece:
non risultano orari pubblici stabili;
l’accesso avviene solo tramite appuntamento;
la fruizione dipende da contatti Facebook o accordi privati;
non risulta un riconoscimento formale come museo;
l’unità risulta inoltre essere un’abitazione di categoria catastale A/2.
Il fatto che esistano altri casi simili mappati come musei non significa necessariamente che siano esempi corretti: OSM si basa su verificabilità e coerenza dei tag, non su precedenti eventualmente discutibili.
Sul tema access=private: lo intendevo riferito all’intero edificio residenziale, dato che non appare liberamente visitabile dal pubblico in modo spontaneo. 
Per me la questione centrale è: questo luogo è un museo pubblico oppure una collezione privata visitabile occasionalmente?
Personalmente lo mappererei in modo più conservativo, ad esempio usando:
historic=memorial
MarcoR (2026-05-13 19:24:17+00:00): L'orario non è prevedibile ma a detta della stessa guida turistica è possibile prenotare telefonicamente la visita e mettersi d'accordo su una data; ho verificato di persona visitando l'appartamento (insieme ad altre persone di varie nazionalità) e mi sembra che non via siano altri utilizzi se non quello della "visita della casa in cui è nato Amedeo Modigliani", quindi in tal senso lo trovo stabilmente organizzato; l'edificio in cui si trova l'appartamento è privato ma è una cos abbastanza comune visitare siti archeologici che si trovano all'interno di terreni privati non vedo perché nel caso di una casa museo dovremmo avere dei riguardi in più.

Sono d'accordo che gli altri casi su OSM non possano essere usati come prova di validità del ragionamento, però indicano che non si tratta di una soluzione del tutto campata in aria.

Il luogo a me sembra riconosciuto come casa museo, solo che non è statale ma appartenente ad un privato che lo rende fruibile al pubblico secondo le proprie politiche/esigenze/possibilità.

L'appartamento è citato come museo su:
1. https://www.visittuscany.com/it/attrazioni/casa-modigliani-livorno/
2.  https://www301.regione.toscana.it/bancadati/sistemacultura/SchedaMuseoRwd.xml?IDMUSEO=7065
3. https://casanatalemodigliani.it/casa-modigliani/

Historic=memorial è più adatto a oggetti/luoghi costruiti ad hoc in ricordo di persone o eventi dopo che questi sono scomparsi o accaduti.

L'unico altro tag che mi viene in mente è tourism=attraction ma è una specie di carta Jolly che non indica nulla di specifico (vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=attraction).

Io rimango sempre per  la soluzione tourism=museum + museum=person + gli altri tag che hai rimosso senza motivo.

Penso sia arrivato il momento di sentire cosa ne pensa la comunità italiana a riguardo.