piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TheBestIdea (2023-06-30 17:11:09+00:00): Thanks so much for the info Mashin!

Given that flex post protected bike lanes are very permeable to bikers (i.e. it's easy to move between the car lane and bike lane), that cars seem to keep destroying the flex posts, and to avoid the routing issues like the one I fixed, it's definitely my preference to map protected lanes in the roadbed, like this, with tags on the main way. But I'll leave matters of preference to local mapper. 

But if it is to be mapped separately, the now duplicative "cycleway=lane" tag on the main Edgewood Ave ways should be removed. 

Brandon
conradoos (2023-08-03 13:38:32+00:00): Cześć,
dlaczego dodałeś "bridge=yes" do tych dróg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844057494, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844057495,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297316461? To nie są mosty zgodnie z definicją z wiki: bridge=* używamy do opisywania budowli stworzonych do przeprawy dróg, torów kolejowych, kanałów itp. ponad innymi elementami transportu lub rzeką, doliną itp.
Rogoyski (2023-08-03 18:15:35+00:00): No nie, zamiast pochwalić mnie za posprzątanie tego, co było wcześniej.... :D

Ale po pierwsze, dla mnie jest to niewątpliwie część mostu Gdańskiego. A po drugie, rozpatrując same schody osobno, to nie są schody terenowe, tylko konstrukcja, pod którą można przejść, a więc most (czy też kładka, jak małe mosty piesze zwykło się nazywać). 

Nie jest jednak dla mnie w ogóle na razie jasne, w jaki sposób twoim zdaniem nie spełnia to definicji mostu. Chodzi o to, że musi być nad jakąś przeszkodą? Definicja na polskiej Wiki pochodzi z 2012 i potrzeba sporo wysiłku i dosłownej interpretacji, żeby uznać, że te schody się nie kwalifikują. A przede wszystkim, na angielskiej wiki, z której te słowa były tłumaczeniem, takiego zdania już od jakiegoś czasu nie ma.
conradoos (2023-08-04 07:54:24+00:00): Masz rację, to jest część Mostu Gdańskiego, więc pasuje bridge=yes.

Co do tego, że bridge musi być nad przeszkodą, to wynika z samej definicji słowa "bridge" (https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/bridge_1), więc może dlatego nie ma już tego w angielskiej wersji wiki. Bo zakładam, że gdyby to były np. zewnętrzne schody przy budynku, to takie schody już by się nie kwalifikowały jako "bridge". Ale w sumie to nie wiem, jak Anglicy dokładnie rozumieją "bridge".
Frans S (2023-07-01 09:31:55+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings do not meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. ( see attached document for more info)
A: Not accurately drawn.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137934438
audtr (2023-07-22 13:05:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3761644
Bienson (2023-07-10 03:41:19+00:00): Wege nicht verbunden - korrigiert in

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138318169
MxxCon (2023-07-03 02:10:57+00:00): Hello.
You updated many businesses but their phone numbers didn't change. That seems rather strange. Is that accurate?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137935037
mavl (2023-07-02 13:35:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138023905 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137684791]
mavl (2023-07-02 13:35:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138023905 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137684791]
mavl (2023-07-02 13:35:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138023905 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137684791]
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-07-06 23:00:59+00:00): reverted
Zandu (2023-11-15 05:12:36+00:00): Cleanup and addition of relation tags to reuse single way methodology.  Primary tags were moved to relation.  JOSM error checking did not discover any errors prior to committing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137935839
Wright One (2023-07-12 15:10:20+00:00): According to Sentinel-2 imageries, the crescent moon-shaped island (way 1185830509) has restored to sea in mid 2022.
Xvtn (2023-06-30 14:56:16+00:00): Hi, and welcome again to OpenStreetMap! Your edits look good overall, but since you've asked for review, here are a couple of tips:
- It's best to avoid overlapping buildings and parking lots. Feel free to improve/adjust the building outlines as necessary to prevent this. More accuracy is always better.
- In the iD (online) editor, you can press "Q" to make shapes square.
- It looks like you've added a couple of commercial landuse areas to try and indicate "holes" in parking lots. A better way to do this is to draw the hole outline, then select both that and the outer parking lot, and press "C" to combine them into a multipolygon relation. Let me know if you want more info or explanation on how these work.

As always, thanks for your contributions!
Hufkratzer (2023-06-30 18:56:09+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1180974463 looks like a riding arena (similar to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/709817408), but you have tagged it as a riding centre (leisure=horse_riding). 

Here an example for a riding centre which contains a riding arena: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/786324169

Wiki:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aleisure%3Dhorse_riding

Similar case: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/707110220

In JOSM you can use the preset "Equestrian Sport" to tag riding arenas.
Minh Nguyen (2023-09-23 19:12:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141657991 adds the appropriate tags and cuts a gap in the road to ensure that routers won’t send drivers into the tree or into the creek.
Frans S (2023-08-04 10:25:51+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
A: Not accurately drawn.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapping them as 1 building.
E. Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137938312
Faheem Chui (2023-08-04 11:03:22+00:00): Thank you for reminding me on my earliest project with inexperience skills. I was wrong for not fixing buildings with inaccurately buildings , mapping multiple buildings as one and not squared buildings. I should be more focus and consideration on checking my mapping, especially the earliest one.  
Best regards and keep validating!
Faheem Chui
Xvtn (2023-06-30 14:06:39+00:00): Just a tip, when drawing rectangular features in iD you can press "Q" to square up their corners. This makes them look much better when rendered.
Xvtn (2023-06-30 14:15:31+00:00): Also, welcome to OSM!! :)
TheSwavu (2023-06-30 09:25:34+00:00): Hi,

You might want to read up on what a tertiary_link tag is for https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=tertiary%20link

For starters one end must be connected to a highway=tertiary.


Thanks.
Glassman (2023-06-30 17:31:08+00:00): As long as the path is easily verifiable it can and should be in OSM. If the path isn't open to the public then it should be tagged with access=private
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137939193
Glassman (2023-06-30 17:33:36+00:00): Is this no longer called Crescent Valley Watershed? If so just remove the name tag. Using a descriptive name in OSM is discouraged.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137939193
rogersclan (2023-07-01 19:15:43+00:00): Crescent Valley Watershed is a made up name to make it seem like it is public land.  It would be like putting a name to your back yard.  Please remove this name as it is misleading.  Alternatively, show me an official source for this name?  Beyond somebody just naming it.
Glassman (2023-06-30 17:31:30+00:00): As long as the path is easily verifiable it can and should be in OSM. If the path isn't open to the public then it should be tagged with access=private
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137939210
Zandu (2023-11-11 01:13:06+00:00): What is this an invalid tag modification? It is a very helpful clarification to the map.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137939229
user_20041368 (2023-08-04 12:01:26+00:00): مرحبًا السيد birhat ، لقد تلقينا إشعارًا بأنك قد أجريت ترتيبًا جديدًا وأعدنا التفاصيل لأنه موضوع غير صحيح. لمزيد من المعلومات https://www.openstreetmap.org/iq/birhat
Joseph R P (2023-06-30 03:12:58+00:00): Meant to say secondary, not tertiary
Mingwei (2023-06-30 06:04:45+00:00): Thank you!
pitscheplatsch (2023-08-27 07:27:28+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140436015
pitscheplatsch (2023-08-27 07:29:42+00:00): Ok, and the contributor of the reverted changeset has been deleted. I should have check this first. Sorry.

#HappyMapping
mueschel (2023-07-04 13:18:16+00:00): Hi,
please explain the meaning of "maxspeed:left:conditional" - "left" is not used in combination with maxspeeds and there is no conditional statement in the value.
Black_Diamond (2023-07-04 13:49:46+00:00): This is a sign where the max speed is only when taking the left track instead of going straight. The sign is yellow with a left arrow underneath the numbers on the pole on left side of the track. The tag is trying to follow the format described here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions#Tagging

Though I do admit that it’s missing the @. The condition is when going left and nothing more.

I had originally deleted the FIXME for this issue, since the limit was already on the track, and I was having a hard time addressing the FIXME tag to tag the sign correctly. @impiaaa didn’t like that solution.

The previous discussion on this topic can be found here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137889032
mueschel (2023-07-04 13:53:57+00:00): Thanks for the explanation!

The problem is, "left" refers to the left side of a way, but can't be used on nodes.
 
I suggest:
maxspeed:conditional = 20 @ (turn = left)
Vinber-Pro (2023-06-30 06:56:38+00:00): Please, be careful, your changeset is all over the world ...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137939866
simonschaufi (2023-06-30 12:10:35+00:00): I'm aware of that. For some reason I can't control when StreetComplete uploads the changes as it groups them in chunks somehow.
Patrickov (2023-07-03 17:25:00+00:00): That very much suggests StreetComplete is a flawed if not bad editing tool.  Any ways to place a complaint on its (apparently buggy) behavior?
Matija Nalis (2023-07-04 02:49:55+00:00): ref: https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/discussions/5116
nyampire (2023-06-30 08:00:51+00:00): こんにちは。OSMへようこそ。
編集をレビューしました。

基本的に問題なく編集できていると思うのですが、この編集だけ、とても広い範囲で橋梁名などを編集されているようです。

橋梁の名称は、ご自身で調査されたものでしょうか？あるいは、利用の許諾のある情報源からの内容でしょうか。

ご存知かもしれませんが、OSMでは、著作権で保護された他の地図（例: GoogleMapsなど）からのデータ転載は行うことができません。もし転載をしてしまっていた場合、このコメントなどでお知らせください。対象の変更セットを巻き戻しします。

その他は問題なさそうです。
これからもぜひ、編集を続けてみてください。
Happy Mapping！
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137939995
もちお (2023-06-30 15:11:07+00:00): こんにちは、レビューありがとうございます。
今回の編集内容は、どれも私自身が過去に現地に赴いた橋梁です。
著作権に関するご忠告ありがとうございます、今後注意を払い、編集致したいと存じます。
nyampire (2023-07-05 09:09:20+00:00): コメントありがとうございます、ご自身で調査されたとのこと、了解しました！

もしよかったら、今後も編集を続けてくれると嬉しいです。よろしくお願いします！
user_5359 (2023-06-30 06:16:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I revert your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys).
Tyeniz001 (2023-06-30 04:55:13+00:00): It forgot the barangay Cerdaña. it was part of the municipality of Malabuyoc, not Boljoon.
felipeeugenio (2023-06-30 16:02:18+00:00): Hola Andrés. Te pedimos por favor seguir haciendo los cambios que haces sin consultar con la comunidad. Estás usando tags equivocados. Además preocupa la fuente de tus datos. Este tipo de cosas se conversan.

Por cada edición tuya hay que pasar varios minutos arreglando errores y no contestas los mensajes que te dejamos. Te pedimos por favor entrar al chat y consultar lo que necesites y vemos como te podemos ayudar.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137941329
jptolosa (2023-07-01 04:11:14+00:00): Los barrios no se delimitan usando un polígono de suelo residencial.
os-emmer (2024-02-23 20:04:02+00:00): Hello 11000matias,
you used amenity=emergency_service and emergency_service=technical here. These tags got deprecated a few weeks ago. Is it possible that emergency=disaster_response would be fitting?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157487736
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Ddisaster_response
os-emmer (2024-03-07 19:28:46+00:00): I opend a note about this topic to make it more public:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4143439
Vinber-Pro (2023-06-30 06:55:37+00:00): yep, tu as effacé les batiments aussi ? erreur je pense non ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137942165
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-04 09:29:14+00:00): j'ai remis le batiment supprimé
rodolfovargas (2023-07-01 01:28:07+00:00): Hola!
Gracias por las atualizaciones de las aceras. 
Me parece etiquetar aceras en situación de construcción: construction=yes.
De esta manera se mantiene highway=footway

Saludos.
Rodolfo Vargas
Brandberg (2023-07-04 01:41:48+00:00): Hola rodolfovargas. Veo de Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=126236076797331&lat=-16.525569400002&lng=-68.153201100003&z=17&focus=photo) que todavía hay obras en esta acera. Sugeriría que el etiquetado podría configurarse como highway=construction + construction=footway según https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction. Te dejaré actualizar estas formas. Gracias por contactarnos.

Hello rodolfovargas. I see from Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=126236076797331&lat=-16.525569400002&lng=-68.153201100003&z=17&focus=photo) that there is still construction going along this footway. I would suggest that tagging could be set as highway=construction + construction=footway per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction. I will let you update these ways. Thanks for reaching out.
rodolfovargas (2023-07-04 02:15:44+00:00): Hola  Brandberg.
Para este caso la foto de Mapillary es del 2022, en la actualidad ya esta trasnitable la acera.
De todos modos, para otros casos utilizo tu sugerencia.
Gracias por el comentario. 

[Hello Brandberg.
In this case, the Mapillary photo is from 2022, currently the sidewalk is passable.
Anyway, for other cases I use your suggestion.
Thanks for the comment.]
Brandberg (2023-07-06 00:50:33+00:00): Sounds good. Thank you for confirming. Have a great day!
ovruni (2023-06-30 06:09:32+00:00): Hola, tal como le había escrito en el conjunto de cambios 135082140 [0], las vías como veredas que están diseñadas para peatones deben de etiquetarse como "highway=footway"
Saludos
[0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135082140
daperson (2023-07-01 01:46:05+00:00): hola, me podrias verificar como se verifica o certifica que una via es disenada para peatones a traves de un satelite?

Saludos
ovruni (2023-07-01 01:54:54+00:00): Hola, las vías en la ciudades suelen ser vías diseñas para peatones, muchas de estas suelen tener un color mas claro si se realizan con concreto, adoquines y otro material.
Saludos
Vinber-Pro (2023-06-30 06:54:41+00:00): le name est une description, c'est donc à retirer. Si il doit y avoir un nom alors c'est le nom spécifique de cette route et pas sa description Route résidentielle -> ceci est décrit par l'attribut highway=residential
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137942659
Vinber-Pro (2023-06-30 06:52:45+00:00): l'activité a bougé mais est-ce que le batiment a disparu ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137942660
Ramamonjisoa (2023-07-01 09:04:30+00:00): C'est au bon emplacement, vérifié sur terrain, c'est une construction récente.
Vinber-Pro (2023-06-30 06:51:55+00:00): une épicerie, shop=convenience
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137943319
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-04 16:07:59+00:00): et tu as créé un batiment alors qu'il en existe déja 1.
l'épicerie est-elle bien dans ce batiment ?
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-04 16:08:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1184627609
Vinber-Pro (2023-06-30 06:51:30+00:00): pour des équipements type CSBII, voir ceci https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_Madagascar/Formations_Sanitaires#%C3%89tablissements_sanitaires_publics
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137943598
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-04 16:09:43+00:00): Une réponse ?
qu'est ce qui se trouve dans ce batiment ?
Vinber-Pro (2023-10-11 05:14:29+00:00): allo ????
Leo Slager (2023-07-01 09:37:39+00:00): This script causes a lot of damage to the map.
Please consider to revert this changeset:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=4.40605&lat=51.68630&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=long_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way%2Clong_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way
Leo Slager (2023-07-02 09:09:04+00:00): restored dragged nodes
quantenschaum (2023-07-02 13:33:14+00:00): Oops, sorry for that and thank you for the comment. Did you already fix it?
Leo Slager (2023-07-02 15:48:15+00:00): Yes, i did fix the aerea.
It was more easy as I thought.
Buoy VK-E was re located from NE to the SW of the aerea and took de way of the aerea with it.
So it was easy to restore the aerea.
Leo Slager (2023-07-02 15:50:05+00:00): It goes wrong as a buoy is attached to a way.
Leo Slager (2023-06-30 16:03:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2023-06-30 16:06:32+00:00): Please do not use Bing Maps Aerial.
Use pdok in stead. Its not outdated and very good to the ground.
Frans S (2023-07-02 08:28:06+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please use the tag 'track'not in urban areas
About tagging of highways
Please read and follow the tagging rules on this linked document.
Decision tree, which tag to be used for roads
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S48CEVi3yiAYWhIJu57jtLyv0ZVUbGwJ/view?usp=share_link
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
or
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
Best regards
gscholz (2023-07-02 10:08:16+00:00): Hi  Frans S v,
thanks for this hint,
actually I am not interested in "mapping" there but in bug fixing, hence my comment:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=137944233

Kind regards
Guido
Luzandro (2023-06-30 15:30:34+00:00): du hast den Bach Längapiesting hier über einen schon bestehenden Bach verlängert
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159404112#map=19/47.85027/15.88886
fkv (2023-06-30 16:30:28+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Das war keine Absicht und ich hoffe es jetzt behoben zu haben.
M Damour (2023-07-01 10:50:46+00:00): Thanks brother for mapping, try to change the shape of the building and the shape of the roads
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137944261
Frans S (2023-08-10 08:19:01+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.
E. Buildings not squared.
Sometimes it looks like there is a kink in a garbled or saddle-shaped roof. This is because the image was taken at an angle. Such a roof is simply rectangular.
* Quality prevails over quantity!!

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137944321
highflyer74 (2023-07-03 18:43:16+00:00): Hello!

Could you take a quick look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1185889914? There is a typo, but I am not able resolve as I do not know which kind of barrier it is.

All the best from across the Channel!
James Derrick (2023-07-04 06:26:30+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for spotting the corrupted tag text - JOSM seems to slow down after longer sessions and fail to keep up with a macro keyboard giving occasional strange tags. 
I might have to create custom validation as slowing the keyboard code hasn't  fixed JOSM's apparent slowdown.
Fixed:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138090862
Thanks again, and Happy Mapping,

James
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-04 16:06:07+00:00): Bonjour,
tu as créé un https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1185897094 mais il existait aussi https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11010110198

est-ce une épicerie nommé Taratra ? est-ce qu'il y a d'autres activités ?
user_5359 (2023-06-30 07:44:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys)
Frans S (2023-10-11 09:36:42+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please map buildings as building=yes at future mappings.
Best regards and keep mapping
Igor Bubelov (2024-08-20 05:41:09+00:00): Hi! Does it still accept bitcoins?
AnnieChang (2023-06-30 07:50:13+00:00): #msftw #msftw230630
(forgot to add hashtag...)
jcr83 (2023-07-02 10:24:25+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour les corrections.
Une petite question : pourquoi ajoutez-vous foot=yes sur les pistes et sentiers alors que c'est la valeur par défaut ? (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#France)
prouzet (2023-07-03 11:27:08+00:00): Bonjour,
Je pensais que la précision était utile : l'accès est très restreint pour les véhicules mais libre pour les randonneurs.
Frans S (2023-07-24 15:24:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark. I noticed that you map buildings partly covered by trees along the tree lines. Just extrapolate the rooflines covered by trees.
Best regards
Ten_Brian (2023-07-26 12:18:14+00:00): Hi Frans S,
thank you for your feedback. I will correct the data. Do you think there is another imagery layer which could be used for this edit? Thank You!
cotesta (2023-07-13 07:07:11+00:00): Grassland is named based on private ownership, no relevance to the public map. Name is being removed and the dimensions shortened.

Also, do not attach landuses directly to roads. Bad practice.