piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2023-11-29 07:23:57+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

schön, dass du hilfst die Karte aktuell zu halten.

Ich habe direkt ein paar Hilfreiche Anmerkungen und eine Frage für dich:

- Die (wichtige) Frage: Warum entfernst du an den Wegen die Eigenschaft, dass sie für Radfahrer vorgesehen sind? (bicycle=designated) Laut Straßenbildern von 2022 sind dort Verkehrszeichen 241 aufgestellt. Ist das weiterhin der Fall?

- OSM ist ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt und es arbeiten vor, während und nach uns auch immer andere an der Karte. Aus diesem Grund ist es wichtig, dass wir unsere Änderungen aussagekräftig Kommentieren und nicht nur einen "." setzen. Details liefert dieser Artikel im Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Weiter viel Spaß bei OSM
silversurfer83
silversurfer83 (2023-11-29 07:30:00+00:00): Und hier bin ich direkt noch einmal, diesmal mit dem nächsten Hinweis :)

Wenn du dir auf openstreetmap.org dein Profil ansiehst und auf "Bearbeitungen" gehst, siehst du dies:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/kart057/history#map=8/52.020/8.800
Um jede unserer Änderungen wird eine sogenannte bounding box gezogen. Das große orange Rechteck ist auch der Grund, warum ich auf deine Änderungen aufmerksam wurde. Da du in einem Rutsch ein Gebäude in Emden und einen Weg Thüringen bearbeitet hast taucht diese Änderung bei vielen anderen Mappern auf, die ihre Gegend beobachten.

Daher möchte ich dir bei dieser Änderung folgenden Artikel ans Herz legen: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Und noch ein Tip für Objekte die in der Realität nahezu rechtwinklig sind: Nach dem Zeichnen einfach die Taste "Q" drücken. Damit macht der Editor dir das Objekt schön rechtwinklig :)

Grüße
silversurfer83
cxc (2023-11-29 11:23:41+00:00): Hi, I think the tag is wrong, or at least useless, it's a private access!
k127 (2023-11-29 12:59:19+00:00): Pls refer to my reply at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144569219 thx
cxc (2023-11-29 11:21:17+00:00): Hi, i thinks no_exit is a wrong tag. this is a private access
bye
k127 (2023-11-29 12:56:19+00:00): Hi cxc,
'noexit=yes' is not related to permissions. It just explicitly states that this is the end of the way, so that it won't be interpreted as erroneous when close to another end.
Best
k127
cxc (2023-11-29 14:21:31+00:00): before accessing that road you must have the keys to the gate. I reiterate that such a tag at that point is useless. But my opinion. Greetings
k127 (2023-11-29 23:38:27+00:00): Hi cxc,

from that perspective, you're right – for any ordinary person using OSM for driving/routing, my change is pointless (but not wrong, though).

On the other hand, there is OSM data validation and consistency. And that's my motivation in this case (and, more generally, the motivation of a number of so called MapRoulette challenges).

I have been adding the tag 'noexit=yes' to explicitly state that these are ways that are ending properly.

Otherwise, some validation software would think that it is a mistake if the way just ends there and is not connected to the open end of the other way next to it.

Best
k127
ppku (2023-11-30 18:49:42+00:00): noexit means that there is no way to go beyond this point, even on foot.

@k127 The change is wrong, unless you know that there is not a door reachable at the very end of the road.

As the door cannot be visible from above, this would mean that you inspected personally,, which I doubt in this case.

Finding stupid QA tools is not that hard, the proper fix is to file a bugreport.
k127 (2023-11-30 19:04:25+00:00): Hi ppku,

please allow me to point you to the wiki page for this tag [1], where it is _explicitely_ stated, that:

"Use the noexit=yes tag at the end of a highway=* to indicate that there is no possibility to travel further by any transport mode along a formal path or route. The tag noexit=yes is mainly useful where a road or path ends close to another way but where it isn't possible to get through due to a barrier or other obstruction, which may otherwise look like a mistake for a connection to the nearby road. It helps other mappers and quality-check programs to understand the situation correctly."

"Its purpose is to either confirm a way ends when this way has limited visibility on satellite imagery (e.g. blocked by trees), or to inform quality assurance software or a human reader that an otherwise suspicious tag or road layout preventing passing further than the end of a road is perfectly intentional (more usage instructions)."

Do you disagree with the wiki?
Do you disagree with my edit?

Best
k127

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:noexit%3Dyes
ppku (2023-11-30 19:40:24+00:00): Unless you know that there is not a door right near the end of the highway, your edit violates the definition:

    "Use the noexit=yes tag at the end of a highway=* to indicate that there is no possibility to travel further by any transport mode along a formal path or route."

Clearly "on foot" is a transport mode.

The rest is not part of the semantics of the tag and is not part of the interface between OSM and the applications.
ppku (2023-11-30 19:42:22+00:00): There is also a fundamental problem in the TomTom roulette, https://github.com/tomtom-international/open-data/issues/9
cxc (2023-11-30 19:49:51+00:00): @ppku @127
grazie
i2004 (2023-11-29 01:52:30+00:00): hola desde mañana la 34 empieza a funcionar el ramal aeroparque
Aim311_ (2024-01-22 19:35:36+00:00): Na tym odcinku https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1242041768 od ponad roku droga jest nieprzejezdna. Wobec czego "szlak przemysłowy" jest niekompletny.
moje_konto (2024-02-01 17:48:31+00:00): W tej edycji dodałem tylko kilka oznaczeń szlaku zauważonych w terenie: https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/14133569

Odcinek już oznaczyłeś jako prywatny, na fotomapie nie widać objazdu, być może górą polem, ale to niepewne bez sprawdzenia, więc na razie takie oznaczenie jest ok.
tyfi (2023-11-29 00:53:30+00:00): ...and add bridges along the way. I couldn't rework the footways in Mercer, as they were kind of all over the place.
user_5359 (2023-12-02 07:55:33+00:00): Hello! Which value of postcode is correct? B4A 0E5 or B4A 0C2?
HMWamboldt (2023-12-03 00:00:32+00:00): The store recently moved. Their website is out-of-date. See Ref:

https://www.flyers-on-line.com/directory/mark-s/NS/bedford-bedford-commons-plaza

I think it's correct as mapped, but I'll happily defer to a more authoritative source. I try to practice egoless mapping. :) Best Rgds, -H-
Kovoschiz (2023-11-29 06:06:57+00:00): Surely everyone refers to them as "Star Ferry" .
mapper377 (2023-11-29 02:25:38+00:00): Changeset comment should also have stated "Add some details to the Priest Elementary-Middle School which occupies this block."
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-29 08:00:24+00:00): Is "Axis Gis" some data source? What is its license?
StreetSurveyor (2023-11-29 10:41:49+00:00): You can access it off of the Warren official page. Here is the link to the official GIS:
https://www.axisgis.com/warrenri/
MxxCon (2023-11-29 04:54:19+00:00): Hello.
Please note that "lux level=" is not a valid OSM tag.
Could you please elaborate what are you trying to map here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144571110
Viajero Perdido (2023-12-16 02:45:17+00:00): Hi.  Combined zh/en name should be at "name" tag, the name you entered should be at "name:zh", and the English translation only at "name:en".  See many examples nearby.
Viajero Perdido (2023-12-16 02:46:28+00:00): PS, translator says "Lion King's Pointing Station".  Is this real?
Kovoschiz (2023-12-16 06:31:14+00:00): This is a rock under the mountain Lion Rock. Local names won't be translated accurately.
Viajero Perdido (2023-12-16 06:39:06+00:00): Thanks for clarifying.  In that case, a single tag would be appropriate, "name" not "name:en".  Cheers.
Viajero Perdido (2023-12-16 17:27:12+00:00): PS, I'd suggest natural=rock rather than tourism=attraction.  It seems odd to be an "attraction" without even a trail approaching.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Drock
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dattraction
Matt_ (2023-11-29 02:51:12+00:00): Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_National_Inventory_of_Dams
And: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/42491
Zandu (2023-11-29 03:27:59+00:00): Moving tags from ways to relations to reduce overlapping ways.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144571260
Zandu (2023-11-29 03:29:29+00:00): Fixing means making something whole or complete. If you don’t accept these corrections your maps will be broken. Not sure why this flags for a suspect word. I’d love to know so I can use better descriptions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144571293
tyfi (2023-11-29 03:19:05+00:00): Part of CR344 is actually JJ to connect with Angeline Conservation Area. MoDOT likes to have fully state-maintained routes to conservation areas.
tyfi (2023-11-29 04:26:12+00:00): To clarify: that county road was taken over by MoDOT, but that wasn't reflected in TIGER/Line 2007
stillhart (2026-03-29 12:09:58+00:00): thank you for the supercharger 😊
There are more and more in around :-)
Patrickov (2024-01-16 01:16:01+00:00): IMHO most roads involved already have sidewalks separately drawn that this tagging is unnecessary?
Kovoschiz (2024-01-16 06:14:25+00:00): I use `sidewalk=` first because you need to check whether they are all correctly connected. Many are poorly drawn.  Afterwards, should be `sidewalk:*=separate` + `sidewalk:*=no` by side.
Kovoschiz (2023-11-29 06:09:15+00:00): This is not what `company=` is used have. It duplicates info with the `=substation` .
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-13 21:05:27+00:00): Any update on the closure(s) you mapped?  Generally temporary changes are not mapped.
BunnyFluff (2023-11-29 04:37:06+00:00): Used an imaginary offset on Bing's latest of -0.90; -0.82
Dinsh (2023-12-01 09:35:40+00:00): 250 orphan Duplicate building nodes Deleted
LarsBG (2023-12-02 21:19:42+00:00): Hej 
Ang https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11383077109

Så er der en cvr på hjemmesiden men ikke samme navn ? 
Jeg er ikke verdensmester i cvr så er det noget du vi kigge på ?
b-holdet (2023-12-03 06:47:24+00:00): CVR er opdateret nu.
Det står på hjemmesiden og ejeren af hjemmesiden er den samme som ligger bag CVR-nummeret.
Kovoschiz (2023-11-29 06:12:03+00:00): Please stop changing `=uncontrolled` to `=unmarked` when there is already `crossing:markings=no`
maraf24 (2023-12-06 22:15:12+00:00): Brak podstaw do takiej zmiany. Nazwa jest nowa, więc łatwo sprawdzić jak dokładnie ona brzmi.
pavvv (2023-12-07 06:58:47+00:00): zmieniłem nazwę w celu konsekwencji; na reszcie "Obwodnicy Śródmiejskiej" występuje pisownia "Aleja" np. Aleja Armii Krajowej
maraf24 (2023-12-07 19:57:45+00:00): Nie ma potrzeby takiej "konsekwencji".
A jeśli w terenie jest "aleja Armii Krajowej", to tam też należy zmianić.
We Wrocławiu aktualnie występuje mix pisowni nazw rodzajowych, ale miasto sukcesywnie wymienia tabliczki na nowe wersje, pisane małą literą.
maro21 (2023-12-07 22:18:14+00:00): pavvv: konsekwentnie możesz zmienić w innych miejscach na małą literą :). Tylko to wymaga też zmiany we wszystkich adresach, których jest dużo.
pavvv (2023-12-09 14:53:49+00:00): W Warszawie, Krakowie, Łodzi, itd. wszędzie jest pisane dużą literą. Lepiej dostosować się do konwencji niż zmieniać nazwy w całej Polsce lub mieć część alei pisane dużą, a część małą literą.
maraf24 (2023-12-10 11:00:22+00:00): Nie ma konwencji. W różnych miejscach w Polsce jest różnie. Np. w Szczecinie jest tak (małą) od początku.
W takiej sytuacji najlepiej stosować się do "ground truth", bo to jest podstawowa reguła OSM i taką edycję zawsze się da dzięki niej obronić.
MxxCon (2023-11-29 18:16:47+00:00): Hello.
Please note that you damaged valid OSM data.
OSM does NOT have tag called "CATEGORY=".
OSM does NOT have tag called "COUNTRY=".
All tags in OSM MUST always be in lower case.
As explicitly stated on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description the description tag MUST NOT be used for advertisement or promotional messaging. It MUST be neutral tone describing what this feature is.
Tag "addr:street=" MUST included ONLY fully spelled out street name. It must NOT include apartment or suite or any other info.

As such, this edit will be reverted in full.
If you continue to intentionally enter incorrect data into OSM it will be considered vandalism and your account will be referred to DWG, which can result in temporary or permanent account ban.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144574799
impiaaa (2023-11-29 18:30:35+00:00): layer=* is not a physical descriptor, just a hint to the renderer for what order to draw features. Therefore it applies to the building, but not the associated amenity. It's fine to make gas stations a separate POI, but it wasn't wrong before either.
Black_Diamond (2023-11-29 19:27:15+00:00): Fair point.

I had a discussion elsewhere in the county about whether a bridge crossing a highway and a railroad should be on layer 1 or 2. I moved the bridge from layer 2 to layer 1.  There wasn't a layer 1 before, and it was the only bridge in the area that did this. The other person's concern was that the road and railroad could be on different layers because they *could* on different grades even though they are parallel. I advocated that they are on the same grade below the bridge and thus there is only 1 layer below the bridge.

So some other people have thought of it as a physical descriptor. Though it shouldn't be confused with level in a building, which is a physical descriptor.
fortera_au (2023-11-29 06:59:47+00:00): Hi there, you've made a few edits of objects and then deleted them, are these real objects?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144575367
arjunaraoc (2024-01-02 08:37:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my update to fix minor issues: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145788338

Happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144575716
Buraddo (2023-11-29 10:51:44+00:00): Hello, I don't think this is the case. Each entering road has give way for the traffic inside the roundabout, so it is truly a roundabout. The lanes are a bit funky because they tried to do a "turbo-roundabout", in which some lanes leave the roundabout at every exit, but the traffic rules still don't change. 
The only exception would be the tram that is going inside the roundabout, but it officially has to give way for traffic in the roundabout, even though in practice the cars always stop for it to go.
Here is some news when they painted the lanes like this, the mayor called it the super turbo roundabout :))
https://www.tion.ro/stirile-judetului-timis/primaria-timisoara-a-inventat-super-turbo-giratia-intersectia-de-la-aem-a-iesit-din-santier-813576/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144576094
AdrianTamplaru (2023-11-29 15:38:16+00:00): Yes, entering traffic has to yield. But that’s not sufficient for it to be a roundabout. To qualify it as such you also must yield to traffic inside when exiting, which is not the case when exiting on Liviu Rebreanu. 

There is also no signage indicating that this is a roundabout. It’s just a circular road that’s very similar to one. 

About the article, the mayor may have called it a super duper roundabout, but so does almost anybody that is not a police officer.  😅

Articles and drivers behavior aside, I believe we should compare it to similar junctions, such as Puncte Cardinale, Piață Veteranilor, Shopping City entrance, and Bulevardul Revoluției 1989 (also incorrectly tagged). Mind from street level they all are marked the same, not as a roundabout.
bernardo60 (2024-02-22 08:24:00+00:00): Way 1227523864 cannot be a "living street" because it is only one metre wide and therefore it has to be a path. Do you mind if I change your tag to path? I am actually living here in the neighborhood. Thanks for contributing to OSM.
arjunaraoc (2024-01-01 02:22:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my update: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145750679

Happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144576972
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-11 17:12:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367442740/history - have you meant foot=no ?
literan (2023-12-06 16:55:31+00:00): не хулиганьте, а то будет блок
bxl-forever (2023-11-29 11:39:09+00:00): Hello,

On their website, "de Cuynder" is spelt with a lower "de".
https://decuynder.nl/

Why did you change it into "De"?
VLD548 (2023-12-11 17:30:40+00:00): In other sources the name is written as "De Cuynder". I agree that the own website is leading. Please change it to "de".
aTarom (2023-11-29 13:36:32+00:00): Hola janqm, la ele modificada en
SantJeroni de "1235.6" a "1237"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3451961521/history
es correcto? dime que fuente usas por favor?
Saludos
Nakaner (2023-11-29 10:39:14+00:00): Hi,

the conditional access tagging you used is invalid. Months have to be provided as abbreviations.

Best regards

Michael
fortera_au (2023-11-29 08:51:32+00:00): There's no signs indicating these restrictions, why are they being mapped?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
fortera_au (2023-11-29 08:51:31+00:00): There's no signs indicating these restrictions, why are they being mapped?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
ciclista (2025-11-15 09:14:03+00:00): Hallo Wolfgang,
was ist denn die Quelle für diese Änderung?
Wir erfassen die Straßennamen so, wie es auf dem Schild steht.
Gruß, ciclista
WolfgangKeller (2025-11-18 19:02:32+00:00): Hallo Ciclista,
wir sind am letzten Wochenende kurz in Seligenstadt vorbeigefahren. Wenn man die erste Einfahrt von der St 2260 kommend reinfährt, steht dort gleich am Anfang ein uraltes Straßenschild mit "Am Bahnhof". Dagegen steht auf dem Schild mit der Hausnummer am Bahnhofseingang "4 Bahnhof". Wir verwenden für unsere Arbeiten im WürzburgWiki unter "Normalumständen" den BayernAtlas, aber auch OSM. Unsere Kartenausschnitte in den Artikeln verwenden alle (ohne Ausnahme) OSM.
Ich werde in den nächsten Tagen bei der Verwaltungsgemeinschaft Estenfeld (dazu gehört Seligenstadt) nachfragen.
Liebe Grüße aus Würzburg
Wolfgang
Map-Peter (2023-11-29 16:54:29+00:00): Hallo Therese,
 
du hast die Brücke vergessen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/181787#map=19/53.35367/12.92252 , dadurch ist nun eine Lücke in der Relation.
 
Bitte korrigieren, denn ich kann das nicht. Danke
 
Gruß Peter
Müritz Nationalpark (2023-12-04 07:01:39+00:00): Hallo Peter, danke für den Hinweis. Das ist erledigt.
Viele Grüße
Therese
arjunaraoc (2024-01-01 02:17:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144579045
eggie (2023-11-29 09:26:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt gedaan. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-11-29 09:28:31+00:00): Nog een tip 
De wegen niet vastplakken aan de landuse. Ik maak even wat los. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-11-29 09:29:04+00:00): Je pad wel doorverbinden met de wegen.. Het zal anders niet routeren
eggie (2023-11-29 09:35:44+00:00): Dag Veentje.. Het beste kun je een terugmelding doen naar het Kadaster anders komen de afgebroken gebouwen gewoon weer terug als periodieke import.
Een terugmelding kan hier.
Gesloopte gebouwen staan nog in kadaster en nieuw gebouw ontbreekt. 

https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Vaart+Zuidzijde+139&objectId=0085010000001475&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=222309.51917781786&geometry.y=551521.7583067435&zoomlevel=14.712

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-11-29 10:19:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Tip probeer niet tye schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.. Dit geeft vaak schade door onbedoelde verplaatsingen van objecten. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Japol (2023-11-29 10:26:46+00:00): oke sorry, hou ik volgende keer rekening mee
eggie (2023-11-29 10:32:44+00:00): Top!
Syl (2023-11-29 09:59:55+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue.
J'aurais quelques remarques concernant les deux bâtiments que vous venez d'ajouter :
- les bâtiments sont déjà terminés ? Sinon "bâtiment en construction" est plus adapté comme type. Et si il n'y a pas encore de construction du tout on ne met rien dans OSM.
- le nombre d'étages correspond en fait au nombre de niveaux, en comptant le rez-de-chaussée
- il n'y a qu'un seul appartement par bâtiment ? C'est ce à quoi correspond "Unités". Sinon vous pouvez juste ne pas renseigner ce champ, il est très peu utilisé en France.
- Dans le nom on met seulement le nom du bâtiment si il en a un, le nom de la résidence doit aller sur la zone et la lettre du bâtiment est renseignée comme référence (à rentrer avec la clé "ref" dans la partie "Attributs").
N'hésitez pas si vous avez des questions et si ça vous intéresse nous organisons des rencontres tous les mois : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Saint-%C3%89tienne#%C3%89v%C3%A9nements_%C3%A0_venir
Bonne journée.
syntex (2023-12-02 17:23:38+00:00): Tylko ślady GPS? a jakieś inne źródło?
Sebastian | Yanosik (2023-12-04 06:34:57+00:00): Tak, informacje prasowe, np https://www.przegladpiaseczynski.pl/artykul/11007,nowa-droga-na-ukonczeniu-zdjecia
Ale bez konkretnego terminu w artykule, dlatego sprawdzałem kiedy pojawią się ślady GPS użytkowników Yanosika na tym odcinku.
Pozdrawiam
syntex (2023-12-05 13:15:53+00:00): Niestety, ale był to błąd. Potwierdza to ten artykuł https://www.przegladpiaseczynski.pl/artykul/11277,piaseczno-jezdzili-po-nieoddanej-do-uzytku-drodze
habi (2023-11-29 09:45:29+00:00): The street is called Vorschis, without double-s.
vmicho (2023-11-29 21:52:29+00:00): Looks OK.
I'll look at the guideposts South later when I come by ;)
ivanbranco (2023-12-10 18:54:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/935722317/history

?

I mapped this area as a farmland, and you edited it as a inner of a farmland of which this farmland isn't part of...?

Inners should be inside the outer way, not outside, maybe was a mistake?
Mlvln (2025-05-22 09:06:23+00:00): Hallo Sophie La, 
ich verstehe nicht warum du an diesem service way ford=yes eingetragen hast. Ist da eine Furt oder dürfen da nur Ford-Autos lang fahren?
LG Mlvln

Hello Sophie La,
I do not understand why you tagged o this service way ford=yes. Is there a ford or is it only allowed to access this way with a ford car?
Best Mlvln
eggie (2023-11-29 10:13:55+00:00): Dag Japol  Dit klopt niet ..
tracktype=grade1  is verhard..
unpaved is algemeen. Het was getagd als gravel  Dat is grade2 surface=gravel..

Nu is het onduidelijk.
MVG
eggie
Japol (2023-11-29 10:25:42+00:00): hi, kunt u het aanpassen? deze weg ontbrak en moet dezelfde eigenschappen hebben als de wegen links en rechts daarvan op de kaart. graag hoor ik hoe ik het had moeten doen zodat ik het een volgende keer ook goed doe