piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MatchaHatesGoogle (2024-07-06 04:59:20+00:00): Hey, it looks like this waterway was somehow changed to a cycleway, but it definitely exists according to imagery. This should be undeleted and changed to a waterway again. I'm happy to do so if you don't know how, as I'm not sure how to undelete an object with iD. Thanks!

-Matcha
Langlaeufer (2024-07-04 06:32:23+00:00): Hallo Andreas, weillkommen bei OSM. Danke das du hilfst OSM zu verbessen.. Empfehlungen zum Erfassen von Radverkehrsanlagen in Deutschland findest du hier:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagenn kartieren

cycleway bitte nur für reine Radwege verwenden.
Grüße und frohes Mappen 
Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153515872
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-04 14:45:52+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153551553
Fan map 2 (2024-07-19 18:10:48+00:00): Proszę najpierw zapoznaj się z Uchwałą nr VIII/237/19 Rady Miejskiej w Łodzi z dn. 27.03.2019 (dodającą 57. obszar SIM), a dopiero później używaj takich inwektyw w stosunku do innych mapowiczow jak „radosna twórczość”.

Co do rzeczonych łódzkich absurdów – zmapowane są zarówno dawne dzielnice (z prefiksem „Dzielnica” – tu się zgadzam, że możnaby to zmienić na „Dawna dzielnica”) jak i jednostki pomocnicze miasta (z prefiksem „Osiedle”).

Koniec końców obawiam się, że ten hasztag bardziej pasuje do Ciebie, bo sam dodajesz np. ulicę Kaczorową – brak w internecie jakichkolwiek informacji potwierdzających tę nazwę.
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-04 14:48:13+00:00): Should be reviewed by the local community. Thanks!
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-09 01:57:41+00:00): Changeset reverted.  As you were told before, do not delete features just because they are "private."  Access tags should be used instead.

Deletion is not the answer, especially when it is clear it exists on aerial imagery.  You can read more here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Also, as for your address request:  
183 East Wears Valley Road, Pigeon Forge, TN 37863

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153725635
Langlaeufer (2024-07-04 06:33:54+00:00): highway=footway ist ein reiner Fußweg. ein bicycle=no sollte dort nur erfasst werden, wenn es tatsächlich eine solches Verbotsschild gibt. Anderenfalls ist es redundant. Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153516083
Luzandro (2025-03-18 18:24:58+00:00): wurde offenbar schon wieder verschlimmbessert 🙄

https://osmcha.org/changesets/163736485
unni-geo (2024-07-04 13:36:31+00:00): Hallo Badabuga,

du hattest hiermit zwei shared-nodes (jeweils Verbund von Gebäude, Zaun und Landnutzung) einmal quer über die Blasewitzer Straße geschoben.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12033480086
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12033480085

Ich habe es nach besten Wissen zurückgeändert, siehe CS:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=153548209
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153548209

Bitte schaue nochmal drüber, ob ich nichts vergessen habe.

Grüsse!
silversurfer83 (2024-07-03 21:28:14+00:00): Moin :)

für den Schlüssel "flag:type=*" sind laut Wiki schon einige Werte definiert. Deutschte Freitexte sind dort nicht vorgesehen.
Guck mal hier rein und dann kannst du den Wert vielleicht anpassen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:flag:type

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153516630
richardwallis1996 (2024-07-04 18:28:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1292170640

This is not Lea Brook, this is most likely a drainage ditch. Lea Brook was culverted many years ago. Please confirm your data source for this name.
mrpacmanmap (2024-07-07 22:44:10+00:00): It was assumed to be Lea Brook based on historical OS maps that show it passes here.
flohoff (2024-07-05 15:32:09+00:00): Hi,
ich hab das hier gerade gesehen. Also dieser schnipsel ist definitiv kein grade3 - Das ist komplett asphaltiert.

Wenn der jetzt weitergegangen wäre der track bis ins Feld könnte man ja sagen "Okay - kleine ungenauigkeit" - Aber so würde ich das sogar eher zu einer Service Road machen.

Das ist ja hauptsächlich eine Verbindung zwischen Radweg und Straße und komplett Asphaltiert.
Leo Slager (2024-07-04 21:46:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
NotAvailable (2024-07-04 09:13:33+00:00): سلام آپارتمان چند طبقه است؟
پلاک ساختمان چند است؟
چه تعداد واحد دارد؟
Soshal Distan Singh (2025-02-06 21:00:05+00:00): Добрый день.

Зачем же "addr:place" из адресов удалять?

Ну, типа, как здесь:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51986149/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75317323/history
и т.д.

Надо было заменить "посёлок Тельмана" на просто "Тельмана". addr:place это существенная часть адреса, вместо "улицы", нехорошо от неё избавляться :|

Причём, отдельные адреса стриткомплитщики уже восстановили, но криво:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/86255125/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75322169/history
и т.д.

Короче, просьба пофиксить.
dypa (2025-02-06 22:08:55+00:00): Добрый!

>Зачем же "addr:place" из адресов удалять?
Населенный пункт изменил статус с посёлок на город и поэтому тег addr:place больше не применим к адресам и требуется использовать addr:city.

На странице https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0 явно прописано, то что тег addr:city избыточен (`Такие теги, как addr:country=*, addr:city=*, часто являются избыточными, так как объекты внутри административных границ (если они обозначены) "наследуют" от них свои атрибуты`).

В "старом" Тельмана дома не принадлежат улицам, так исторически сложилось, поэтому вместо улицы писать "Тельмана" тоже не корректно.

Поэтому считать, что удалена существенная часть адреса не корректно. 

Вы согласны со мной?

>Короче, просьба пофиксить.
Как по вашему мнению должен выглядеть фикс?
Soshal Distan Singh (2025-02-06 22:59:58+00:00): >https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Адреса#Примеры
>2) дом адресуется по населённому пункту

Там написано, что "существует различные точки зрения", но я с таким впервые сталкиваюсь :/ Всегда считал, что если нет addr:street, то нужен addr:place.

>https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr:place
>Использование этого тега, а не addr:street=*, для таких адресов облегчает понимание адреса и работу программного обеспечения.
>Тег addr:place используется Nominatim для адресного поиска, при конвертации в навигаторы, в частности, СитиГИД, для построения адресного реестра, а также валидаторами см. например Универсальный валидатор на основе конвертации в СГ, для контроля полноты заполнения адресных тегов.

Что происходит, когда нет этой части адреса, как раз видно на примере стриткомплита: он указывает на этот недостаток и предлагает заполнить addr:place. Т.е. валидаторы будут думать, что у дома заполнен только номер и чего-то не хватает.

>Как по вашему мнению должен выглядеть фикс?

Я считаю, что в тех домах, где был addr:place=посёлок Тельмана надо это вернуть с заменой "посёлок Тельмана" на просто "Тельмана" (т.к. в теге place=town теперь именно это).
addr:city и addr:place друг другу не противоречат, кстати, и могут использоваться совместно.
dypa (2025-02-07 14:13:20+00:00): я сделал правку под валидатор и навигатор в https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162246920. Хотя я думаю, что этот "костыль" для софта из 2011 года уже не актуален
NieWnen (2024-07-03 22:26:09+00:00): Takie zmiany tylko psują dane, jeśli nie zachowasz przynajmniej official_name względem tego co podaje urząd. Poza tym jakie jest źródło tej nazwy, czemu akurat nie dasz "Hubala" w cudzysłowie, przecież to nie jest nazwisko.
MatchaHatesGoogle (2024-07-06 06:16:40+00:00): Hey it seems like you added addr:housenumber to the road instead of a building here. Did you mean to add a specific address? addr:housenumber shouldn't go on a road like this.

-Matcha
Leo Slager (2024-07-04 21:45:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-08-03 07:21:35+00:00): ta edycja wycofała wandalizm wykonany z tego samego konta
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-08-03 07:22:15+00:00): ta edycja jest wycofana jako wandalizm
The Polish (2024-07-05 09:22:21+00:00): Cześć, po zmianie ulicy którą wprowadziłeś zostało jeszcze kilka adresów do poprawienia:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437939203

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437939470

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437939941

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437939946
idkwhatname2use (2024-07-08 18:37:49+00:00): What the fuck is your problem? The rail routes ROW still exists here and in almost all the other places that you undid my edits shitstain. I LITERALLY SPENT HOURS MAPPING THESE AND, IN THIS CASE, LITERALLY JUST COMPLETING THE TAGS ON A FEATURE THAT ALREADY EXISTED WHICH ALREADY FOLLOWS AN EXISTING ROW. I HOPE U GET HIT BY A CAR
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-03 21:50:37+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8334656203
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229509683

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-03 22:20:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10032406275
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10032406276

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-03 22:40:35+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Henryka Dobrzańskiego-Hubala":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106926520
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106926585
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218856452
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354284684

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NieWnen (2024-07-03 23:18:04+00:00): Zmieniając nazwy ulic, należy pamiętać o adresach :)
Nazwy muszą się zgadzać.
Barroszt (2024-07-03 22:38:31+00:00): Fryderyka Chopina
The Polish (2024-07-05 09:21:09+00:00): Cześć, po zmianie ulicy którą wprowadziłeś zostało jeszcze kilka adresów do poprawienia:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3138757387

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7084316339

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393260596

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/715147101

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/715147108
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-03 22:50:41+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2948696579
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326753541

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Claudio Salvatore Fabrizzi (2024-07-06 15:10:13+00:00): Why is the road #1287251105 a tertiary road? The following definition from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Afghanistan does not apply.
"Major transportation routes connecting towns and larger villages. Collector function in urban areas. Tertiary roads are used to identify roads connecting two or more villages, a village to a district center or to a National Highway, Provincial or District Road."
Kathyaus (2024-07-06 21:55:42+00:00): Agreed - I had changed a couple of the road classifications but missed this one from the original mapper.
RedAuburn (2024-07-03 22:50:31+00:00): oops, accidentally uploaded without changing comment.
actually deleted a large way tagged with demolished:power=line, as it's no longer visible on imagery and was last edited 7 years ago.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-04 01:05:31+00:00): Hi. Nice work, but when you split houses like this, please make sure they are then actually joined together. iD warns you that they are overlapping: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=1298894071 To fix this, just merge the corner nodes of one house to be on top of the other. Any questions, please ask!
Ygramul (2024-10-08 05:23:09+00:00): Hi; du hast hier Frimmersdorf in Weickersdorf umbenannt. War das Absicht? Siehe auch Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4469122

wikidata und wikipedia stimmen zumindest, aber ich glaube, das sollte wieder zurückgeändert werden nach name=Frimmersdorf + place=village
user_20554852 (2024-10-13 02:13:51+00:00): Dat war ein versehen wurde angepasst.......
nevw (2024-07-12 23:23:09+00:00): Hi Miryam, I noticed these loops on the waterway map which indicates probable errors
https://waterwaymap.org/loops#map=10.28/-7.5211/144.8036
Waterways must flow downstream to the sea and I notice many of them flow upstream instead.
nevw (2024-07-12 23:25:38+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:waterway
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-04 02:22:52+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16354
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-12 16:16:23+00:00): Nice solid first edit!  Welcome!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153524257
NeisBot (2024-07-04 02:48:27+00:00): Hi Khafid Nursalim, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features!?

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=153525026
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-04 05:35:37+00:00): Did you revert your data import?

https://osm.org/changeset/153392886
StreetSurveyor (2024-07-11 00:58:41+00:00): Hi, I'm updating the access since I recently surveyed it.
NeisBot (2024-07-04 03:00:27+00:00): Hi Khafid Nursalim, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features!?

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=153525176
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-04 05:35:43+00:00): Did you revert your data import?

https://osm.org/changeset/153392886
KiloThree (2024-07-04 20:29:24+00:00): This section of grand union has a cycletrack? All I knew of the restriping and resurfacing was buffered and parking protected lanes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153525267
NeisBot (2024-07-04 03:04:26+00:00): Hi Khafid Nursalim, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features!?

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=153525268
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-04 05:35:48+00:00): Did you revert your data import?

https://osm.org/changeset/153392886
Khafid Nursalim (2024-07-05 09:58:13+00:00): all deleted objects are incorrect imported objects
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-05 09:59:44+00:00): Is your data import somehow documented in the OSM wiki?
Khafid Nursalim (2024-07-06 08:09:50+00:00): No.
Khafid Nursalim (2024-07-06 08:10:39+00:00): all objects are deleted from the objects that I import
NeisBot (2024-07-04 03:16:27+00:00): Hi Khafid Nursalim, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features!?

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=153525391
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-04 05:36:42+00:00): Did you revert your data import?

https://osm.org/changeset/153392941
Khafid Nursalim (2024-07-04 08:00:09+00:00): It was deliberately deleted because I made a mistake in importing points
NeisBot (2024-07-04 03:24:26+00:00): Hi Khafid Nursalim, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features!?

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=153525546
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-04 05:40:35+00:00): Did you revert your data import?

https://osm.org/changeset/153392932
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 03:23:00+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164878198
KiloThree (2024-07-04 20:27:55+00:00): This is not a cycleway. It is separated by paint, and only paint. It is not grade separated, it is not hardscape separated. It is fully part of the road surfaces. It is neither as pleasant nor as safe as your routing is implying. This is incorrect by wiki standards, degrades map data for bicycle routing and bike network analysis, and does not represent the physical reality to users of the map.

I attest to my statement here by way of personal survey, and as a user of the map for bicycle routing and safe bike route planning
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153525815
nevw (2024-07-04 05:57:43+00:00): Hi, I have reverted your addition of a  building over a large residential area.
Please only add things that exist in the teal world to openstreetmap.org and especially don’t damage the map for gaming.
jhaluska80 (2024-07-04 06:25:43+00:00): Just a heads up, most houses in the US can be tagged as detached houses.  It's a slightly more specific tag.
rene78 (2024-07-07 23:30:50+00:00): Hi Zh9567, great work! Just a minor heads-up: I think the right way to tag those terraced houses apparently is "building=house" and "house=terraced" according to the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dterrace). Bye, Rene
user_177389 (2024-07-04 09:15:44+00:00): Hello worldconflictmap,

natural=coastline belongs to ways, not relations. You have to give the renderer time, coastline is rendered less often than all other things.

Best regards,
Mario
kapazao (2024-07-04 16:40:11+00:00): Hi, I do not know what have you checked but you did it wrong. One thing is a man_made=survey_point and another one a natural=peak and you should not merge them into one element when they are 2 distinct elements as they were. You should check IGN layer before doing these changes.
Regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153527175
Lübeck (2025-05-28 09:47:48+00:00): OK
QC3 Construction (2024-07-04 06:16:09+00:00): Hi,
Please remove the Paths name, it is wrong

Thank you
Jordi MF (2024-07-04 08:18:27+00:00): Please, do not use Bing in Spain. The best imagery is PNOA. Use PNOA.
Kaduna (2024-07-07 05:15:53+00:00): Hi Jordi MF. 
Indeed, PNOA Spain is the preferred imagery source in Spain. However, at this location, PNOA seems to be outdated to the best of my knowledge. Therefore, I made the edits based on internal TomTom sources from recent probes. I hope the edit now reflects the current reality. Thank you.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-05 06:52:02+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16362
Meead Saberi (2024-07-05 09:43:13+00:00): Apologies for the overlook. We did follow the OSM technical guidelines on bulk data upload such as human validation, conflation, removing duplicates, and use of appropriate tags. What we overlooked is the discussion with the local community and getting the Wiki page up for our organized/automated edits. Will get those done shortly with clear documentation on our approach. For the records, we did present our approach a few times at the State of the Map conferences. See this from SOTM US 2023: https://youtu.be/wzptabAJ9D0?feature=shared
aharvey (2024-07-08 02:26:20+00:00): It's hard to review these without the source images you used, but from what I can see in the imagery we have around https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12032276774 you have placed 4 trees, but I can only see the eastern 2. Are these new plantings? Or false positives?
Meead Saberi (2024-07-08 02:45:48+00:00): The source images are available here: https://map.footpath.ai/#center=17.82/-33.893735/151.263428

You are right about the case here. Upon checking again, I can see that 2 are trees but the other 2 should have been coded as plant boxes (man_made=planter), not trees.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-08 04:02:25+00:00): Meead, unfortunately, that doesn't fill us with confidence that the rest of your edits can automatically be accepted as correct. Also, by your published Terms of Use, I would think that we are unable to even look at your data to confirm anything.
aharvey (2024-07-08 04:27:51+00:00): I mixed this one up with the tree edits, but still from my perspective these kinds of edits border in the region between an import and an enthusiastic mapper. An enthusiastic mapper taking a lot of photos and mapping in OSM from those photos is core to OSM and we don't expect the data to be perfect. It's just on the other end where we have automated feature detection and automated imports, the potential to cause harm is much larger so we have https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines as a way to try and support imports while minimising the risk of harm.
Meead Saberi (2024-07-08 05:06:45+00:00): We totally understand the concerns here. None of our contributions have been "automated uploads". While we do automated detection from the imagery we collect, we still do human verification. We have only uploaded the data that we have high confidence in its quality. Some mistakes still remain even after human validation due to the scale of the data.

We are adding more details to our wiki page on our process. We will also introduce new licensing terms for the OSM mappers and will add it to our website and Wiki page. We are here to make positive contributions, not creating risks or damages. Happy to abide by whatever the guidelines and the community states. Happy to modify and enhance our process, so we can continue contributing.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-08 06:05:43+00:00): That's all great, thanks. I'm sure people would love to be able to view your imagery for mapping purposes! Most important thing is to follow those guidelines & talk before starting a new process. As mentioned previously, it would be a good idea to start up your own thread here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/oceania/73 & also join in discussions in the Oceania thread at https://discord.gg/openstreetmap
APneunzehn74 (2024-12-23 17:36:47+00:00): Hello, you have entered a theme park here? Could this perhaps be a tour operator?
GretaMN (2024-08-05 10:35:47+00:00): Liebe:r ChMenges,
bitte beim Tagging von mehreren Verkehrsschildern in entgegengesetzte Richtungen an einem Punkt nur ein DE im traffic_sign Tag nutzen (traffic_sign=DE:205;240).
Danke! :)
#lgmaps
joost schouppe (2024-07-04 07:39:56+00:00): Merci, je had de Task dan op "Not an issue" mogen zetten
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-04 06:40:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6933809014

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
KrystianKociszewski (2024-07-04 20:46:10+00:00): Jest poprawna to ta sama ulica jednak droga ziemna.
NorthCrab (2024-07-09 17:04:54+00:00): Hej, może w takim przypadku addr:place byłoby poprawniejsze?