piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Marek-M (2023-03-04 08:29:29+00:00): Why did you copy these names into the 'name:uk' tag? In at least one case you copied the Polish name to 'name:uk': https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/542269231
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133274436
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 16:06:25+00:00): it was supposed that all texts in "name" tag were already in ukrainian languange and so just filled into corresponding field "name:uk". of course errors happend and minor fixes need to be done manually. sorry for that, it will be helpful if you can fix errors that you can handle yourself
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 16:10:00+00:00): i fixed that error
Marek-M (2023-03-04 18:16:08+00:00): Copying Ukrainian names in Ukraine to the 'name:uk' tag is completely redundant. Duplicate names make renaming errors more frequent - some people don't notice that in addition to the 'name' tag, additional 'name:*' tags need to be updated.
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 00:47:18+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 00:49:09+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 00:51:07+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 00:52:23+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 00:53:53+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 00:55:41+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 00:57:12+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 00:58:41+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 01:00:03+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 01:01:15+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 01:02:25+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 01:05:21+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
Supaplex (2023-03-04 03:29:30+00:00): 東河鄉
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133274679
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 01:07:01+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 01:08:29+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 01:12:04+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 01:14:30+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 01:16:51+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
Mazda05 (2023-03-04 02:20:29+00:00): Там, де name латинкою, це не є name:uk. Прошу виправити
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 02:27:58+00:00): наприклад?
Mazda05 (2023-03-04 03:27:43+00:00): наприклад Rozetka
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 01:19:56+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 01:29:22+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 01:31:16+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-04 05:22:00+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 01:38:25+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 01:39:59+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 01:41:45+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 01:43:16+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-04 02:38:24+00:00): Hello N. Are you quite sure about this? It's rather unusual to have a set of steps running the entire length of both sides of a street, separate to the existing sidewalk, and with it's own unusual name?
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 01:44:33+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 01:45:52+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 01:49:37+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 01:51:45+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 01:53:31+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 01:54:39+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
Gazer75 (2023-03-06 10:49:14+00:00): I'd suggest going with the lifecycle prefix was:*=* on the tags for the ferries. Disused might not be supported in many cases, and many maps will still show a route as long as the ferry tags are there. A was:route=ferry will not.
CartoonistHenning (2023-03-06 19:13:37+00:00): Hi. Thank you for your suggestion. You are absolutely right. I corrected my contribution.
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 02:18:17+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 02:19:27+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 02:21:06+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 02:22:53+00:00): "name" tag was copied to "name:uk" (for elements that did not had "name:uk" tag), no other changes were made
emersonveenstra (2023-03-04 12:29:34+00:00): Hi,

When mapping golf courses, please don't add a name or description tag to holes, fairways, greens, or tee boxes. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=golf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls for more details. Would you mind removing those?
emersonveenstra (2023-03-06 13:09:59+00:00): Hi,

did you mean to disconnect https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1143821863 from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1075911546?
TheDutchMan13 (2023-03-06 16:39:32+00:00): No, i forgot to reconnect it after splitting the road. Thanks for pointing that out.
TheDutchMan13 (2023-03-06 16:40:05+00:00): It's fixed now.
emersonveenstra (2023-03-06 16:44:52+00:00): Thanks!
ovruni (2023-03-04 03:49:02+00:00): Hola Ovrunmsm, en este conjunto de cambios se han cambiado fronteras que involucran a varios distritos, las cuales contienen geometrías en base a las fuentes del gobierno, como son los ministerios MINAM, MINEN, MTC, etc. Estos puede verse por ejemplo en el visor del MTC https://portal.mtc.gob.pe/emergencia_vial/emergenciavial.html
Por otra parte, los cambios de fronteras deben de ser discutidas previamente con la comunidad, por lo que he revertido este conjunto de cambios. Para cualquier consulta sobre el mapeo en Perú existe el telegram https://t.me/osmpe y la lista de correos https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
Zol87 (2023-03-16 04:30:41+00:00): Just out of curiosity, I know street names are fully spelled out on OSM, but wouldn't points like bus stops benefit from shortened names be easier to see at farther out zoom levels or when other points are nearby like a separate bus shelter or mailbox? Also, that's how they are listed on Pace's bus stop list like 2036 Lincoln Hwy as opposed to 2036 Lincoln Highway.   
https://www.pacebus.com/sites/default/files/2020-04/801.pdf
Mundilfari (2023-03-17 01:31:15+00:00): "Farther out zoom levels" - where exactly? On the slippy map on the openstreetmap.org website?
This is only one data consumer out of many; and any of them is free to abbreviate names so they look better visually. For a data consumer, it is relatively easy to abbreviate spelled out terms, whereas guessing the correct spelled out word from the abbreviation is quite error prone.

The one exception is abbreviations that are themselves idiosyncratic (think CTA, FBI, ...) - these are generally accepted.

If you insist on having the abbreviated version tagged also, I guess the official_name tag could be worth looking into. However, not sure if you're aware or not, but Pace in particular isn't entirely consistent with how they name their stops themselves (e.g. in some cases, the names on the time table don't match the names on the list of posted stops, or the name on the ventra app, for that matter). 

In a way, abbreviating names so they display nicely on one particular map (e.g. the slippy map on osm.org) is a form of tagging for the renderer, which should generally be avoided - see here for more details: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Here's some further info on names and abbreviations. Note that this isn't just talking about street names, but names in general. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(don't_do_it)
❤️‍🔥 (2023-03-04 07:50:10+00:00): hey, you might want to check out https://kyle.kiwi/iD/#background=gabrielle2&map=19.53/-39.56104/176.92280 - I've added the high resolution aerial imagery from days after the cyclone. it will take quite a while before this imagery makes it into the official version of iD
NyanSten (2023-03-06 08:16:39+00:00): Hi, thanks, I was using LINZ post-Cyclone imagery already but this makes it easier to see in iD.
ovruni (2023-03-04 03:55:26+00:00): En este conjunto de cambios se han revertido ediciones no discutidas con la comunidad. Ver mensaje en el conjunto de cambios 133275809
Dimitar155 (2023-03-04 14:40:06+00:00): Hello ch0k1,

Addresses in Bulgaria are written in Cyrillic script, not Latin. I've fixed the current mistakes but please make sure to write them correctly.

Best wishes,
Dimitar
Mazda05 (2023-03-08 08:36:39+00:00): Добридень, навіщо ви видаляєте коректні дані?
avinet_ua (2023-03-08 09:52:48+00:00): доброго дня
я видалив тільки дубль точки Ева, вже одна така поруч є
hdevine825 (2023-03-04 15:09:50+00:00): I didn't see a source on this changeset is this change based on an observation or assumption?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133276446
DougDeden (2023-03-04 19:18:27+00:00): Observation. The city/county GIS has it as Kansas Avenue, and the street sign is also "Kansas Av".
hdevine825 (2023-03-04 15:07:28+00:00): I think the best approach to this situation is to split the road way where it crosses into and out of the building and tag the section in the building as tunnel=building_passage
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133276533
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-04 04:39:18+00:00): Use better changesets.  What did you change and why?  "BE" tells me nothing about what you did.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133276563
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-04 04:40:37+00:00): Please use more detailed changeset comments.
GOwin (2023-03-16 08:02:09+00:00): Hi there, and thank you for your OSM contributions.

In the future, could you add the sped tags to the school ground feature, and not the school building? 

Thank you.
emersonveenstra (2023-03-04 12:21:12+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for contributing to the map! Just fyi, while it's not wrong to add it, it's pointless adding foot=designated or highway=footway, because it's implied. So you don't need to spend time adding that tag
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-04 05:53:48+00:00): What does "bs" mean?
Frans S (2023-03-08 12:13:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
You clustered most of the buildings.
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133277093
emersonveenstra (2023-03-04 12:19:41+00:00): Hi,

Did you mean to put foot=designated and bicycle=designated on the road?
DUGA (2023-12-31 23:38:48+00:00): All edits here have offset and do not make much sense in terms of parking lot.
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-04 05:51:32+00:00): As mentioned in previous changesets, please use more details than just "bs".  What did you change, and why?

Good changeset comments are very important for contrbuting to OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133277274
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-04 05:53:23+00:00): STOP.

Please add better changeset comments.  Read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-04 05:52:41+00:00): STOP!

READ THIS BEFORE CONTINUING!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.
marczoutendijk (2023-03-05 11:38:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6925

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
NorthCrab (2023-03-04 06:13:55+00:00): Edytuję wyłącznie przejścia z moich poprzednich edycji. Każde z nich widziałem kiedyś na oczy.
joneabcxyz (2023-03-04 07:02:55+00:00): Acacia wood is hardwood use for making furniture. https://acaciawooddb.com/
kuhni74 (2023-06-26 14:59:14+00:00): Mir ist klar, dass der Siedlungsname auf "residential"-Flächen nicht ganz die "reine Lehre" ist, aber in diesem Fall ist die Situation besonders im Norden recht komplex, wo ein kleinerer Teil nach Altlengbach (Gschaid) gehört und der Rest nach Pressbaum (sh. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3581745). Man könnte den falschen Eindruck haben, dass auch der Norden "Schwabendörfl" heißt. Ein (nicht ganz befriedigender) workaround wäre, das Siedlungsgebiet https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15554853 an der Gemeindegrenze (vormals sogar Bezirksgrenze) zu splitten, sodass man die Teilung zumindest dann sieht, wenn man eines der Objekte anklickt (das machen aber wohl wenige, daher nicht ganz befriedigend).
Luzandro (2023-06-26 19:17:30+00:00): Es gibt auf der Gschaidstraße - also mehr oder weniger direkt an der Grenze - die Ortstafeln "Schwabendörfl". Ich kann nichts daran erkennen, dass oder warum die Gebäude nördlich der Grenze nicht zu dieser Siedlung gehören sollen. Administrativ und postalisch gehört es halt zu einer anderen Gemeinde, aber die Gemeinde-/Bezirksgrenze ist ja sowieso auch ersichtlich. Dass eine solche durch eine Siedlung geht, ist jetzt meiner Einschätzung nach nicht soo ungewöhnlich
kuhni74 (2023-06-26 20:30:11+00:00): na immerhin haben die Gebäude nördlich der Grenze früher "Gschaid" geheißen und nur die südlich "Schwabendörfl", damit sollte es doch klar sein?
Luzandro (2023-06-27 10:31:46+00:00): die Anrainer nördlich der Grenze sehen sich auch in Schwabendörfl, siehe Backstube Gitti:

"in Schwabendörfl: Gschaidstraße 29, 3033 Altlengbach"
https://www.backstubegitti.at/kontakt/
kuhni74 (2023-06-27 13:57:49+00:00): Naja, weil das "Zentrum" von Gschaid ja von dort per Kfz nur über Hochstraß erreichbar ist - wenn sie "Gschaid" schreibt, findet sie kein Mensch. Das Ganze ist hier halt alles sehr kompliziert, nicht zuletzt weil Schwabendörfl zwar zur Gemeinde Pressbaum (KG Pfalzau) gehört, aber Post Altlengbach (wie Gschaid), Telefon Eichgraben, Pfarre Klausen-Leopoldsdorf,... Ein besonderes Schmankerl ist dieser Hof hier, der bis vor kurzem in der Tat zu 3 Bezirkshauptmannschaften gehörte (seit der Auflösung von WU nur mehr 2): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259115221
Woazboat (2023-06-27 21:44:16+00:00): Die genaue Gemeindezugehörigkeit ist für den Ortsnamen doch irrelevant und nur weil da ein paar Meter drüberstehen bezweifle ich dass sich der Teil anders nennt. Wenn dann wäre das sowieso nur ein _Teil_ des Ortes und kein separater eigenständiger Ort.

Die `addr:*=*` Tags bestimmen nur die postalische Adresse die abweichend vom geläufigen Ortsnamen sein kann.
vandepwv (2023-03-04 08:37:58+00:00): Hej mjans, bedankt voor deze correctie, blijkbaar was ik hier de "inner" connectie met het omringende "beheerd bos" vergeten. Je mag het me altijd laten weten wanneer je een fout/vergetelheid van mij corrigeert, zo leer ik nog wat bij.
Frans S (2023-04-04 15:01:26+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
You mapped a Tertiary highway in the middle of nowhere.

Hello, I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions. Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date. Most of the traces of roads in rural areas needs to be mapped as track when they only give access to farmland etc.
In general when highways connect settlements, buildings and villages use the tag unclassified, when you are mapping in a rural environment
Please focus on highways which connects isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and bigger. https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/
 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway --- 

You tube video Intro mapping roads.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzZWur1YG1k
eggie (2023-03-04 08:37:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-03-14 10:45:48+00:00): Dag EOS..

Ook hier allemaal duplicated ways 

De wandelpaden aan de zuidkant van de plas zo op het eerste gezicht.
Heb je enig idee hoe dat komt?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-03-14 10:47:07+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133279209
eggie (2023-03-14 10:49:17+00:00): Het is nu door verschillende mappers aan de orde gesteld, maar je hebt nog niet gereageerd op opmerkingen.. Althans niet op de changesesets.
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=1296171
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-03-14 13:51:34+00:00): PB contact.
eggie (2023-03-16 06:52:27+00:00): Even beginnetje gemaakt met duplicated ways verwijderen. 
Met de landuse is eigenlijk deels hetzelfde gebeurd.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-03-16 07:08:13+00:00): Duplicated landuse en water ook verwijderd...
Denk nog wel naar de mp relaties kijken   Die liggen ook dubbel. Ook misschien nog losliggende wegen. 
Het blijft foutmeldingen regenen. 
Toch heb ik het zelf ook wel eens aan de hand gehad, maar dacht.. 'Het zal wel aan mij liggen' en ook niet zo massaal.
eggie (2023-03-16 07:21:33+00:00): Dubbele mp relaties verwijderd  ..
Maar even de rendering in de gaten houden.
Bizar...  
Ik gebruik josm versie 18678 update  02 03 2023
Jouw wijzigingen zijn van 04-03 -2023

Anders maar eens op het forum navragen of dit probleem meer aan de hand is.
MVG
eggie
antonr (2023-03-04 19:17:32+00:00): Hej torstenbondo,

Velkommen til OpenStreetMap!

Som du måske har bemærket er din ændring af adressepunktet blevet omgjort. Det sker fordi adressepunkter i Danmark automatisk importeres/opdateres baseret på myndighedernes data.

Hvis adressepunktet skal flyttes, kan du skrive til den relevante kommune, som kan ændre i kildedata.

Hvis du ikke har tålmodighed til at vente på dem, kan du selv flytte punktet og markere det med autoaws=ignore[1]. Det slår automatikken fra. Og så er det god stil at du fjerner autoaws=ignore igen, når kommunen har rettet til.

Mvh
antonr

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AutoAWS
hdevine825 (2023-03-05 03:28:55+00:00): Thank you for your edit. Please add a descriptive comment in the future.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133279459
FajrAl (2026-07-06 09:52:05+00:00): They are not administrative and have no admin level
FajrAl (2026-07-06 10:06:58+00:00): These are not administrative
flohoff (2023-03-06 21:35:23+00:00): Moin,
hier ist mir aufgefallen das da jemand auf den wegen den namen "Emsradweg" getagged hat. 

Das halte ich für unsinn. Diese wege sind bestandteil des Fernradweges "Emsradweg" - Der name ist aber auf der relation - das gehört nicht auf die Wege.

Flo
wies1 (2023-03-07 05:30:00+00:00): Hallo,
die Bezeichnung Emsradweg habe ich jedenfalls nicht angebracht. Du hast recht, es ist kein Wegname, so dass es nicht hierher gehört. Werde den Namen auf dem Radweg dann später entfernen (heute komme ich nicht dazu, da ich jetzt verreise).
Gruss
wies1
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133280458
wies1 (2023-03-08 09:04:38+00:00): Hallo,
habe inzwischen die Bezeichnung Emsradweg auf dem Radweg entfernt.
Gruss
wies1
luschi (2023-03-08 17:47:22+00:00): Hi,    
Straßennamen bitte nicht abkürzen.    
Hocheggerstr. müsste nach meiner Auffassung getrennt grschrieben werden.    

Bitte auch gleich name:de und name:it ergänzen wenn du die Namen anpasst.

LG
*abq* (2023-06-22 11:49:38+00:00): Bitte nur mappen, was auch wirklich ausgeschildert ist.
VG Reiner
ChehrehBargi (2024-04-13 18:21:10+00:00): You have used incorrect tags to register this building. Field visitors to this place have reported the absence of a large store here.
nmaruichi (2023-03-19 07:37:30+00:00): アストラムラインをrailway=light_rail へと変更されましたが、理由は何でしょうか?
railway=subway も完全に適切とは思っていませんが、railway=light_rail も積極的に変更する理由はも当たりません。
どのような理由で変更されたのでしょうか?
railway=light_railのwikiページ(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:railway=light%20rail?uselang=ja)には、「競合を避けるため、タグ付けを変更する前にフォーラムやメーリングリストで合意を取るようにしてください。 」とも書かれています。
ChehrehBargi (2024-04-24 07:18:09+00:00): Hello
You have included another tag in the name tag. Correct it in the next two weeks.
ChehrehBargi (2024-05-09 06:29:38+00:00): Following the reminder two weeks ago and your non-response in editing the defects of this place, the problem will be removed.
eggie (2023-03-04 11:27:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
tyfi (2023-03-04 09:05:43+00:00): And I am aware the park boundary is glued to the roadway. It was like this before, and I will fix it if it's not fixed next time I can look at it.