piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mcliquid (2024-02-01 12:26:32+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
osmuser63783 (2024-04-10 22:48:11+00:00): Hi, I guess the deletion of  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762653925/ was accidental?
osmuser63783 (2024-04-10 22:49:06+00:00): See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4183207
JBible92 (2024-04-11 07:30:38+00:00): Apologies. Definitely would have been an accident if that deletion was under my changeset. 

I remember editing the building part  as shown in the link below, to match the other side, but never intended to delete!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/991714253/history#map=19/55.95482/-3.18846
silversurfer83 (2024-02-02 09:35:20+00:00): Moin :)

warum entfernst du in dieser Änderung eine Adresse in Schwindegg (bei München!) und dokterst gleichzeitig an der Grenze der Niederlande herum ohne eine ordentliche Quelle anzugeben?

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146937413
lberges (2024-02-02 10:24:48+00:00): Moin auch.
1. In Schwindegg hatten mehrere Adressen eine falsche PLZ. Das habe ich korrigiert.
2. Die gelöschte Adresse habe ich neue eingegeben.
3. Die Änderungen an der ndl. Grenze habe ich nicht gleichzeitig gemacht, sondern anschließend.
silversurfer83 (2024-02-02 11:00:35+00:00): Alles klar. Da wäre für alle Änderungen jedoch eine Quelle angebracht.
Hochladen zwischen den Orten kann man ja mal vergessen.
Warin61 (2024-02-04 03:56:40+00:00): Hi,
For the Newquay Promenade relation. 3 of the 'inners' added touch the outer way - that is an error. I have removed those inners. If the promenade dose not include that areas then the outer way needs to be modified - more wok but them is 'the rules'. 
Let me know if I can help.
RSota (2024-02-04 12:25:44+00:00): Hi Warin61, no worries thanks, I wasn't aware that wasn't allowed but it makes sense. I'll modify the outer way and reinstate those buildings/outdoor area.
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-01 09:39:36+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 146931827.
VLD549 (2024-03-21 16:49:08+00:00): Hi, I can't tell from the site of Delijn whether the name change from Deurne Deurnebaan Albertkanaal to Deurnebaan Albertkanaal is correct. I can only see that since 06.01 the stop Deurne Deurnebaan Albertkanaal has changed.
Thank you in advance.
multimob (2024-03-26 18:54:00+00:00): Hi there!

Too bad you only said that "the stop has changed" and did not say what change exactly. You probably expected us do to all the homework to find out what you had in mind…

The change on 06.01 you mention is only that a Flex bus service now uses this stop, in addition to regular bus routes.
This is currently properly reflected in the properties of this bus stop.
OSM data for this stop is correct.

We would appreciate that you would stop commenting on our changesets, especially when there is nothing special or nothing wrong.
VLD549 (2024-04-04 13:24:39+00:00): Thank you for the information.
Casey_boy (2025-09-10 14:29:45+00:00): Hi,

Is the name "Valour Drive" correct? OS OpenMap Local is showing it as "Valor" without the "u".
Rublistoi (2025-09-10 20:35:26+00:00): Hi, you seem to be correct, it maches Royal Mail adress finder.
eggie (2024-02-01 09:58:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
olehz (2024-05-03 20:21:03+00:00): Resolve issue - це з недіючої лінії зробити діючу і домалювати фейкові сегменти і склеяти 35кв з 10кв? Прикольне покращення )
DmVict (2024-05-05 07:26:51+00:00): Дякую що поправив. 
Я дійсно випадково зробив діючу лінію, хоча потрібно було недіючі сегменти. Щодо нод - вони є. Їх видно. Виправлю цей недолік.
Не можу знайти з'єднання 35кВ з 10кВ.
olehz (2024-05-05 09:05:46+00:00): Тут близько до лінії фронту, тому не чіпав. Але таких ситуацій з частково демонтованими лініями багато. Як зробити аби люди не міняли на маячню через валідатор?
DmVict (2024-05-05 09:52:27+00:00): Думаю що якщо будуть правильні підсказки. 

Стараюсь змінювати згідно https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/ але буває що допускаю помилки і добре що є комюніті яке вказує на це.
eggie (2024-02-01 09:59:30+00:00): Tip   OSM format begint met +31.... 

MVG
eggie
archie (2024-02-01 17:10:14+00:00): Hej, 
Är det här en officiell rutt? Eller mer en privat sådan?
Allmän fråga: är det ok att den som så behagar ritar in sina privata vandringsleder i osm? Något i stil med privata poi?
Jag bara undrar. När blir en vandringsrutt en route-relation? När jag har gått den en gång eller efter andra gången?  
Vill minnas att det förut ställdes krav på att det måste finnas någon som organiserat (sammanställt vägar/stigar) till att vara en vandringsrutt. 
Eller är det "envar sin egen vandringsrutt"?
archie (2024-02-01 17:29:39+00:00): Du har lagt in ett antal vandringsrutter (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1GLA). 
Eftersom uppgift om "operator" saknas på samtliga rutter, måste det antas att det är dina privata vandringsvägar.  
Vad händer om tio år när du har slutat att intressera dig för osm. Då ligger de här rutterna i osms databas helt herrelösa. Och folk som då editerar undrar vad de skall göra med dessa rutter (är de fortfarande aktuella m m). 
Om det är så som jag misstänker (privata turleder) så skapar det problem för andra. 
Om jag har fel i mitt antagande vänligen ta emot min ursäkt OCH för in uppgiften om "operator" för resp rutt, tack.
archie (2024-02-02 10:10:35+00:00): Hej igen, 
dessa leder verkar finnas (https://www.vastsverige.com/bollebygd/produkter/vandringsleder-gesebol/) i verkligheten.
Den här diskussionen hade kunnat undvikas om du angivit källan för din editering redan i själva din editering. Den kartkällan du uppgivit innehåller ingen uppgift om rutt-relationer.  
I pm mellan oss har jag bett dig att:
a) ange vem som "står" för vandingsslingorna t ex i "operator"-taggen. Här verkar det vara någon form av hembygdsförening.
b) rätta till taggarna. Ta bort ref-taggen som har samma innehåll som name-taggen och därmed inte fyller någon funktion alls (redundant). Samt lägga till "network"-taggen.  
Allt detta i det enda syftet att det för andra mappare än dig  själv samt för mappare längre fram i tiden skall stå klart vad det här är för någonting. Så att dessa inte behöver ta till gissningar. Saker och ting förändras; det gäller även vandringsrutter. 
Det är med andra ord en fråga om kvaliteten av dessa edits. Och en fråga om att vara hygglig mot andra mappare. 
Återstår frågan varför du inte har angivit någon källa för dessa rutter.
archie (2024-02-02 12:31:03+00:00): Hoppas inte källan var en karta med upphovsrättsskydd...
eggie (2024-02-01 10:48:01+00:00): Dag Thijs..  De info van de action heb ik naar de adresnode verplaatst conform afspraken binnen OSM Nederland.
Adres verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
Mannivu (2024-02-01 10:40:13+00:00): Ciao :) grazie mille per le tue modifiche. Devo solo farti notare che, per convenzione, in Italia i numeri civici non andrebbero messi sulle linee che rappresentano gli edifici, ma su nodi/punti che vanno messi sulla linea vicino a dove nella realta c'è la targhetta che indica il numero. Vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses#Regole_specifiche_per_l'Italia

Inoltre, il commento al gruppo di modifiche dovrebbe essere qualcosa di più esplicativo di "OK", così che gli altri utenti possono sapere esattamente cosa volevi fare e aiutarti nel caso di errori
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146939301
Cascafico (2024-02-01 10:43:07+00:00): Benvenuta in OSM Giorgia. Confermo quello che ha scritto Mannivu
Max1234-ITA (2024-02-01 11:14:18+00:00): Buongiorno Giorgia, e innanzitutto benvenuta in OSM :-)

Riguardo la mappatura dei civici, puoi prendere esempio dal lavoro già fatto da altri ;-)

Sul "dove mettere" il nodo del civico ci sono un paio di scuole di pensiero: c'è chi lo mette sul perimetro esterno dell'edificio e chi invece (come il sottoscritto) preferisce tenerlo isolato, nelle immediate vicinanze, come ad esempio questo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2821982016.

L'importante, alla fine, è che quando quell'indirizzo viene ricercato, si ottenga come risultato la posizione del punto di accesso (non è necessario che sia preceiso al centimetro, anche se è 1 metro più in là è OK lo stesso :-)


Se avessi dubbi o domande, puoi contattare la Community in ogni momento, sia sul forum dedicato (https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/it/60) che sul gruppo Telegram: puoi iscriverti facendo domanda su https://t.me/OpenStreetMapItalia  (non servono grandi formalità, basta che mandi un messaggio dicendo che vorresti partecipare). 

Sia sul forum che su Telegram ci sono un sacco di persone competenti e disponibili, per cui, davvero, non farti problemi a domandare!

Ciao e a presto,
Max
canfe (2024-02-01 17:52:58+00:00): Mi associo: mettere un commento che non dice nulla non va.
arjunaraoc (2024-02-02 10:38:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146939511
Kovoschiz (2024-03-15 09:14:33+00:00): Please don't use `place=village` etc. They are already rendered with `=locality` , and on eg Historic Places with `*:place=`
Kovoschiz (2024-03-15 09:21:43+00:00): 2. Please use OpenHIstoricalMap for these. OSM is for the reality now.
Mazda05 (2024-02-01 12:38:33+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
flohoff (2024-02-01 11:25:58+00:00): Ernsthaft ? Du möchtest hier einen Edit war anfangen?
Nearby0051 (2024-02-05 11:15:16+00:00): Moin Moin
Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und danke für deine Eintragung :)

Ich habe es ein wenig angepasst
Die große Fläche stellt die Flächennutzung da (Wohngegend) 
Die Gebäude habe ich noch mal einzeln in die Wohngegend selbst eingetragen

Wenn du STRG+F5 Drückst sollte die Änderung bei dir auch sichtbar werden

Sonst musst du nichts weiteres tun :)
Happy Mapping!
CjMalone (2024-02-02 16:36:45+00:00): Welcome, I fixed some formatting issues in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146992551

Let me know if you need any help
dvdhoven (2024-02-01 11:24:45+00:00): In deze changeset heb je een gat gehakt in rwn route 03-34. Die route had ik pas op 08-01-2024 ingelegd.
Wil je alsjeblieft goed uitkijken, het wandelnetwerk Drenthe is enorm uitgebreid en ik vind het niet leuk als andere mappers mijn werk gaan vernielen.
Het lijkt erop dat je deze route Drents- Friese Wold Dagroute Groen wilde verwijderen, maar ipv daarvan heb je 03-34 verwijderd van weg 1245220928

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Allroads (2024-02-09 21:10:20+00:00): Sorry, niet bewust gebeurd.

Delen van de groen route klopte niet en de route was niet volmaakt.
Bewuste weg ligt buiten het gebied van de route

Goed dat je mij er op aanspreekt!
flohoff (2024-02-03 13:23:35+00:00): Moin,
ich hab den change hier gesehen.

Das mit dem access=private auf einem landuse ist eher ungewöhnlich. 

Landuses sind wirklich großflächige einteilung wie ein Bebauungsplan und keine kleinteilige einstufung. 

D.h. das access=private sollte da runter und mit dem drumherum liegenden landuse verschmolzen werden.

Flo
recrayon (2024-08-18 06:42:20+00:00): names and shaped of added buildings are fixed in changeset 155396442
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-02-08 08:04:55+00:00): An issue was fixed. Thanks for the contribution.
booktiger (2024-02-01 15:56:05+00:00): 1.通州万象汇还没开业，用建设用地没问题。2.用地不要画成建筑物。
JhowieNitnek (2024-02-13 05:36:32+00:00): The Wikidata refers to the whole area and not just the old part, if you read the wikipedia (which I didn't edit) and look at the wikidata (which I edited)
bxl-forever (2024-02-13 09:24:51+00:00): Hello,

This comment would have been preferably left on the note where the problem was discussed instead of here.  Reference to the note was provided in the source of the changeset.

However, to me it looks like the request in the note was correct, and the part built in 1930 by architects Michel Polak and René Théry is only the old part (a square).

So, if Electrobel HQ applies to the whole building, an elegant solution might be to only move the wikidata and wikipedia tag to the whole building structure, while retaining the architect/start_date/url tags to way 1245227930.
JhowieNitnek (2024-02-13 09:31:18+00:00): Hi, 
I hadn't seen the note sorry for this I have been very busy lately. I think you are right o leave the architects on that part of the building and moving the Wikidata en -pedia to the whole building.
map per (2024-02-01 19:59:10+00:00): Hallo Jörn Krenzer,

wegen review_requested: Bitte nicht für den Renderer Taggen (vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer).

Viele Grüße
map per
kuhni74 (2024-02-15 20:07:14+00:00): Is it true that the building #36 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1245229595) is not the old mansion any more, but rebuilt in 2004? https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q37801671
mk2k22 (2024-02-15 20:30:31+00:00): Hi,

As far as I can tell – yes. The rebuilt building looks nothing like a mansion to me, unless I’m missing something? :)

Regards
mk2k22 (2024-02-15 20:33:33+00:00): See also this article (esp. the penultimate sentence): https://www.slovenskenovice.si/ona/stil/zgodba-o-gradu-kolovec-stari-tezko-dostopna-rusevina-novega-prekrila-novogradnja-foto/
kuhni74 (2024-02-15 20:34:40+00:00): I don't know how the new building looks like - from google street view, it's not visible (at least I have not found any viewpoint). Did you look at the old image in wikidata? It was not like a castle or palace, just an old big house.
kuhni74 (2024-02-15 20:46:44+00:00): ah, this is very helpful, thank you! I found an image of the new building with the old chapel: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kolovec_Manor_Slovenia_-_chapel.jpg
kuhni74 (2024-02-15 21:02:02+00:00): Can this chapel really be from 1990? looks much older...?
mk2k22 (2024-02-15 21:55:56+00:00): Yes, I had seen the picture with chapel from Wiki data before. I thought you did too, since you mentioned Wikidata in the first place.

I’ve imported these building and their data straight from the GURS register, which is the Geodetic Administration of the Republic of Slovenia. I didn’t pay special attention to the dates, but as you pointed out it’s indeed quite unlikely that the chapel was built in 1990. Perhaps it was merely drawn/added to the register then and was mistakenly listed as the date when it was built. No idea.

Anyway, apparently it’s from the 16th century: http://giskd2s.situla.org/rkd/Opis.asp?Esd=4340
kuhni74 (2024-02-16 12:31:44+00:00): Yes I did see the WikiCommons images, but I didn't understand them completely, obviously. Thank you for this link! Maybe the chapel was renovated in 1990?
mk2k22 (2024-02-16 13:13:48+00:00): Who knows, could be. At any rate, I've changed the date to 16. century, and that's as far as I'll go with my research on this matter. Feel free to carry on with the research, though. Happy mapping!

Regards
kuhni74 (2024-02-16 13:19:15+00:00): Thank you very much! I retagged the date to "C16", since this can be interpreted by some data consumers (e.g. https://gk.historic.place - I love this one) to render it in different languages.
BáthoryPéter (2024-02-01 11:35:03+00:00): Összefoglaló helyesen: Babál-barlang átmozgatása a barlangnyilvántartás szerinti helyére.
(valami JOSM hiba miatt maradt benne rossz összefoglaló)
MxxCon (2024-02-04 06:36:04+00:00): These buildings are incorrectly tagged. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dterrace
They all should be either redrawn to actually show  house=terraced or they should be retagged.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146942467
George Sears (2024-02-01 13:58:24+00:00): Ciao Ivan, grazie mille per questo lavoraccio noioso di cui ti stai occupando, mi scuso per averlo causato. 
Per adesso io mi sto occupando di raffinare, con l'aiuto di Osmose, gli orchard che ho mappato.
mariotomo (2024-02-06 16:02:20+00:00): hola, gracias por mejorar el mapa comunitario OSM. Si tienes tiempo, te invito a completar el area, con los demás edificios que quedan en el mismo conjunto, y la calle de acceso / conexión con la viabilidad pública. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_de_principiantes
mcliquid (2024-02-01 12:34:09+00:00): May I ask why you changed building=office to building=yes? What was wrong with that?

And why did you change the house number from 10 to 11? On this street side are the even house numbers, the odd ones are on the other side. Have a look at the website to see what address they give themself: https://www.roteskreuz.at/vorarlberg/impressum

And you've removed the "Landesverband" from the name, even though the imprint says it's right here.

So all in all, I don't understand quite a lot of your changes here and I am very much looking forward to a clarification for my understanding. Thank you!
mcliquid (2024-02-01 12:36:04+00:00): And why did you completely erase the outline of the existing house number 11 and redraw it (but much less accurately)?
mcliquid (2024-02-01 19:33:24+00:00): I have partially reset this changeset and restored the wrongly changed objects.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146943310
zacki41 (2024-02-02 07:46:55+00:00): DANKE :-)
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2024-04-20 11:59:10+00:00): Aniž křičte, že vám stavbu bořím.
Opravím ;-)
mcliquid (2024-02-01 12:40:54+00:00): It seems to me that the text in the "description" is not a description for the object, but an instruction for other mappers, right? Then it would definitely be better placed in note. Since it's only in English, even in "note:en" please.
zacki41 (2024-02-01 16:29:40+00:00): correct - thank you for this comment - changed it. You are right, just for the mappers
zacki41 (2024-02-01 16:30:13+00:00): The issue often appears with mountain rescue stations - > they easily get tagged as ambulance_stations 

Thank you
mcliquid (2024-02-01 17:33:48+00:00): Thank you for the change!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-01 12:20:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293234088
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1118421036

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mazda05 (2024-02-01 12:38:37+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
eggie (2024-02-01 13:05:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Osmwithspace (2024-06-16 14:50:21+00:00): Ist "Öffentliche Bibliothek" wirklich der Name der Bibliothek? Hat die Bibliothek überhaupt einen Namen? Wenn nein, dann bitte keinen Namen vergeben, da amenity=library ja bereits aussagt, dass es eine Bibliothek ist.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146944258
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-01 10:15:39+00:00): Czy zmiana tagu Wikipedii z linkującego do https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/pl:Kierzkowice%20(Stypu%C5%82%C3%B3w) na linkującego do https://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kierzkowice_(Bor%C3%B3w_Wielki)&action=edit była celowa?
vnourdin (2024-02-01 12:47:49+00:00): J'ai demandé une revue car j'ai eu des soucis avec des frontières (fusionnées avec des chemins) et j'ai dû bidouiller pour régler le souci. N'étant pas expert en relations ça m'arrange si quelqu'un peut jeter un oeil.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146944533
mcliquid (2024-02-01 13:35:32+00:00): Hello, why did you add building=yes to the already existing building:part=yes? Neither makes sense and this building is part of a larger outline, which is why building:part was completely correct.
zacki41 (2024-02-01 16:35:14+00:00): you are right, my mistake
Lejun (2025-06-13 04:55:03+00:00): Une note a été ouverte à ce sujet, tu te charges de faire les corrections (pas de séparation physique -> un seul chemin sur OSM) ?
arjunaraoc (2024-02-02 10:10:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Farm land  border (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1245246730)  should enclosed the maximum extent possible and your edit seems to exclude adjoining farmland.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146944861
mcliquid (2024-02-01 13:33:15+00:00): Hello, you have deleted the house number 16 without replacement. May I ask for what reason?
zacki41 (2024-02-01 16:33:35+00:00): Hello, 

you are absolutely right - My motive was to reduce the number of point features on this location. They did not add any extra information. But please help me out if I was mistaken
mcliquid (2024-02-01 19:23:01+00:00): I have partially reverted this changeset and restored the unnecessary and partially incorrectly deleted elements (such as the street relation).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146944869
jmty8 (2024-02-01 13:08:04+00:00): right tag - #mapbox_editing
added speed limit according to Bing imagery
First3h (2024-02-01 13:14:32+00:00): 很难想象，道牙石绘图和中央绿化带绘图，会出现在同一个路口
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146945417
gpermant (2024-04-11 17:48:50+00:00): Unbeabsichtigt habe ich hier die ganze Schumannstraße zum Fußweg deklariert. Gemeint war nur der neue Durchgang durch das St. Paulus-Areal!
Ich schaue, dass ich das wieder rückgängig bekomme...
eggie (2024-02-01 14:28:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Bienson (2024-02-02 00:22:48+00:00): Die separat eingetragenen Bürgersteige sind schon so korrekt und sollten nicht einfach gelöscht werden. Lediglich die highway=crossing Nodes auf den Zufahrtsstraßen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11576426826

Dieser Baum wird wohl nicht in der Mitte vom Haus wachsen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52345515
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52345516

An diesen beiden Wegen ist der Straßenname nicht gelöscht.

Bitte die Bürgersteige wiederherstellen.
Nakaner-repair (2024-02-01 13:13:42+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 146463963, 146492783.
heketim (2024-02-01 18:21:51+00:00): Road smoothness is a crucial factor in ensuring a comfortable and safe driving experience. It directly impacts vehicle stability and ride quality. Regular maintenance and modern construction techniques contribute to achieving optimal road smoothness. To assess and improve road smoothness, authorities often employ advanced technologies such as laser profilometers and inertial profilers. These tools help identify uneven surfaces and guide maintenance efforts. Achieving and maintaining smooth roads is essential for overall road safety and user satisfaction, supporting the objectives of organizations like http://ssstok.net/.