piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bubozvihorlatu (2024-08-16 21:29:12+00:00): To čo robíš ty sa nikdy nenaučím. Aj tak obrovská vďaka aj rešpekt. Ja sa snažím ponúknuť ľuďom v lese vodu. Preto sa motám okolo prameňov. Tieto som do mapy nedával, len som niečo komentoval. Ten menej výdatný mal označenie pitný: nie, tak som prepísal na áno. Do mapy zasahujem len ak to poznám. Ďakujem
Filip009 (2024-08-17 05:27:28+00:00): V pohode, mne ide len o to, že keď napíšete poznámku do popisu sady zmien, tak to potom v mape niekto neuvidí. Keď to zapíšete do description(popis), tak to v mape bude.
gion274 (2024-08-15 15:56:01+00:00): Ciao Paolo C. forse era preferibile evitare il name=
F Negher - F. Pianezze (EE) (mi sembra non  reperibile su cartelli in loco)
e metterci la sac_scale idonea
Paolo C (2024-08-15 16:56:27+00:00): Ho fatto il sentiero 2 giorni fa e di fatto collega le due forcelle Negher e Pianezze ( su entrambe c’è anche il segnavia col toponimo) per cui mi sembrava corretto dargli questo nome.  Il sentiero comunque non ha segnavia, ma solo una traccia e dal lato Pianezze é anche poco evidente.  Saluti
gion274 (2024-08-15 18:51:27+00:00): Ci sono stato ieri. Dove va il sentiero da-a lo vedo anche dalla mappa senza che ci sia scritto sul name. Il segnavia col toponiomo sinceramente non l'ho visto (ho guardato vecchie foto e li c'era e noi mappatori OSM dobbiamo riferirci alla situazione attuale). Facendo un discorso generale in questi casi andrebbero mappati i segnavia con la destinazione all'inizio e fine del sentiero. Quello che tu metti nel name dovrebbe eventualmente essere messo in un "description". Da escursionista è molto importante sapere la sac_scale del percorso cosa che ometti non so perchè (in caso di EE sarebbero superflui tag come bicycle e horse), poi considera anche il tag trail_visibility.
	Buone Pratiche capitolo name: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_practice
	sac_scale: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:sac_scale
	trail_visibility:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:trail_visibility
	attendo risposta sulla presenza (non presenza) dei segnavia, sac_scale non messa, e attribuzione name non conforma a standard OSM. Ciao
silversurfer83 (2024-08-14 15:48:35+00:00): Hallo :)

es ist schön, dass du mit OSM unterwegs bist und die App OsmAnd nutzt um zur Datenbank beizutragen.

Dazu ein paar Anmerkungen:

Bitte ignoriere das Feld "Name". OsmAnd bietet es zu fast allen Objekten, die es erstellen kann, an. Namen vergeben wir jedoch nach folgenden Regeln:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen

Dann sind Strände seit dem letzten Update von Pokemon Go ein kleines Problemchen bei OSM und wie sie definiert sind, findest du hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dbeach
Strände sind idR definierte Flächen und keine Punkte und sollten besser mit einem "besseren" Editor erstellt werden, wo sie auch wirklich hingehören.

Nach den Anmerkungen noch eine Frage:
Die "Sitzbank": Ist das einfach eine Bank oder ist da mehr?

Grüße und allzeit gute Reise
silversurfer83
AndyB_66 (2024-08-13 16:36:44+00:00): Zmień ref z 16 na S16
AndyB_66 (2024-08-13 17:10:28+00:00): Jednak odcinek Biskupiec-Borki póki co nie będzie S16 (https://radioolsztyn.pl/16-kilometrow-drogi-s16-kiedy-oficjalne-otwarcie-przebudowanego-odcinka/01775159) - zatem jest powód, dla którego tu nie powinno być trunk.
szalona_entropia (2024-08-13 17:56:01+00:00): To nie ma związku. Może być trunk, pomimo, że znaków z samochodzikiem brak.
AndyB_66 (2024-08-13 17:59:51+00:00): OK, jeden rabin powie - tak, drugi rabin powie -nie ;). Poprawiłem ref z 16 na S16 od węzła Borki Wielkie do końca Twojej poprzedniej edycji - a od Biskupca do Borek niech będzie ref 16 i trunk.
woodpeck (2024-08-14 10:22:13+00:00): Dear M0nty_013, thank you for your contributions. You have added house numbers in different regions. Please specify your source for these additions, and if the source is not a survey that you have undertaken, please ensure that any external sources you have used are not subject to copyright.
M0nty_013 (2024-08-16 07:20:39+00:00): Hello. The source is me and my car. In this village, I took a part-time job on the next street.
ivanbranco (2024-08-13 18:10:33+00:00): Ciao LeoBorGiov,

come mai hai mappato la Filarmonica come un municipio? Olginasio non fa parte del comune di Besozzo, il cui municipio é mappato qua?: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1534679387
user_19971463 (2024-08-13 18:59:56+00:00): mi scuso infinitamente per il mio sbaglio perchè volevo selezionare "scuola di musica" ma sotto c'era municipio e si vede che ho schiacciato quello per sbaglio, sistemo subito l'errore grazie!
branco-josm (2024-08-13 19:16:39+00:00): Grazie per la risposta, hai ricevuto altri commenti in altri gruppi di modifiche che aspettano ancora risposte, riesci a dargli riscontro? Li trovi tutti qui: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=19971463
eggie (2024-08-13 17:40:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-08-13 17:41:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
treestryder (2025-05-20 03:03:16+00:00): Do you have an official source for names and locations of these neighborhoods?
cmxn (2025-06-05 23:23:48+00:00): This is what I went off of: https://liveon.msu.edu/neighborhoods
woodpeck_repair (2024-08-16 10:27:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 155320718 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by NikEdGib, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16587
Romwriter (2024-08-13 17:52:21+00:00): This is not a nightclub. What is it, actually?
under_donkey (2024-08-13 19:50:45+00:00): I die not know how to call it. On google it is an "Event Venue".

Howto manage multiple entries there?
totera (2025-06-30 22:00:23+00:00): Su questo percorso https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222010850, anche se non ci sono strisce pedonali ai suoi estremi, passano ogni giorno decine di persone, tanto che si è formato ciò che gli urbanisti chiamano desire path (e gli anconetani stradello: una striscia in cui l'erba è "consumata", più o meno visibile a seconda della stagione).
Arrivi tu e sulla base delle immagini aeree ci piazzi un access=no che indica un accesso vietato da un cartello o impedito da una barriera fisica.
Capisci che abbiamo un problema con le tue modifiche? Spero fortemente tu possa riconsiderare le tue modalità di contribuzione.
f_gonella (2025-06-30 22:15:09+00:00): Ok prendo atto. Grazie.
Hungerburg (2024-08-20 11:25:36+00:00): There is talk on this on the forum, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/117644 - maybe you want to join?
CAI Salò (2024-08-21 09:00:24+00:00): good morning,
the question is much simpler than it may be. Path 30 is used by expert mountaineers, and was opened to connect Val Adamè with Passo Val di Fumo. The project was carried out by volunteers with the help of the Lissone refuge manager. The trail is indicative (like most mountaineering trails, see the trail, final part, of Forcel Rosso), the reason is given by the fact that avalanches and landslides move the rocks with the trail markers. Therefore, it must be followed with the help of paper maps (kompass) and GPS. Furthermore, you must proceed by azimuth, identifying the best route. The trail indicates the route (which is not that difficult) but not the trampling. In fact, the trail is left in gray and is not classified precisely because of the phenomena of washing away and changes in the orography. The route was opened as a normal connecting route, but it is up to the hiker to be able to evaluate (based on their own experience) whether it is feasible or not. The proof is given by overcoming the gully that connects Bivacco Baroni with Bocchetta di Levade, which in some places presents third-grade difficulties. This is enough to make the unwary understand that one should not go further unless one has adequate mountaineering training. However, I would leave aside evaluations on the professionalism of the members of the Italian Alpine Club and the Società Alpinistica Tridentina who daily report and maintain over 8000 km of trails on Italian territory. All the volunteers of the CAI-SAT must be given the best compliments for the work done. No further communications will follow. Thank you. CAI Salò.
Superfebs (2024-08-21 09:34:16+00:00): This route is not in the list of the official CAI paths - the land registry, or "catasto dei sentieri CAI".

https://15.app.webmapp.it/#/map
Hungerburg (2024-08-21 21:38:20+00:00): Perhaps CAI Salò should document in his/her/their personal account profile whether he/she/they are officially appointed to map on the behalves of CAI. Otherwise, all of this is just personal opinion of some unnamed person hiding behind an avatar.
Superfebs (2024-08-22 07:15:59+00:00): Even if they do are appointed to map on the behalves of CAI, this very one route isn't belonging to the list of CAI routes, so for this very route that wouldn't matter much. It would still a CAI account, mapping any public and non-CAI pathway.
Hungerburg (2024-08-25 23:05:44+00:00): Dear CAI Salò, final words spoken, still one question of mine allowed? Would you please elaborate on what you mean when you say "In fact, the trail is left in gray"? Looking at the standard view, it is shown much like a 2m wide footway in a park in Trento e.g. So, not grey at all.
Hungerburg (2024-08-31 21:39:36+00:00): Hmm, no reply for a week. Yet, this is of substantial interest. Openstreetmap is not a paint book where ways are given colours by the mappers. Instead, mappers map what is there on the ground (a.k.a. trampling).

I guess I will have to change the tagging of the way from highway=path;path=route into highway=route. This tag is not widely used. Which colour it renders just up to the consumer of the data. Looking at the way in the tracestack topo renderer, currently it is shown red. And that has been said is not wanted.
SomeoneElse (2024-09-02 12:27:58+00:00): @CAI Salò

> No further communications will follow. Thank you. CAI Salò.

OpenStreetMap is a shared project, and we have to work together to create the best map.  You (as a member of an organisation) don't get a veto on that - other members of that organisation may disagree.  
Please do join the conversation at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/alpinist-routes-marked-as-footpaths/117644 explaining your thoughts here - we'd love to get your side of the story.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2024-09-09 12:54:59+00:00): @CAI Salò Please do join the discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/alpinist-routes-marked-as-footpaths/117644 .  If you don't, people won't have heard your point of view, and any decision reached won't take it into consideration.
SomeoneElse (2024-09-09 12:55:26+00:00): @CAI Salò Per favore, unisciti alla discussione su https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/alpinist-routes-marked-as-footpaths/117644 . Se non lo fai, le persone non avranno ascoltato il tuo punto di vista e qualsiasi decisione presa non lo prenderà in considerazione.
Hungerburg (2024-09-10 18:00:12+00:00): I guess I know now what is meant with red/gray -- https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=15.0/46.1351/10.558 -- help there also has a section on Italy.
Road–Runner (2024-11-03 23:16:10+00:00): So this is the Bochetta de Levade saddle and the key spot, right? https://youtu.be/I3pQbankkXA?si=4cshma0CWV54qbdV&t=581 
And this the gully up to the saddle: https://youtu.be/3qObgHMSdAk?si=v2QzhFkdNQGqwOik&t=118
Cause on the other parts according to LIDAR the steepness is not more than 40° (thus no hints for dangerous terrain).

This speaks in favour of the accuracy of the information provided by CAI. Seeing the videos, I also guess that CAI Salò is with "third-grade difficulties" not referring  to UIAA scale III but propaply to CAI hiking scale?

In my humble opinion, I generally think that someone who is active in CAI can better assess alpine conditions and that a lot of fuss has been made about nothing here.
Superfebs (2024-11-04 11:23:40+00:00): I invite you to go hike that trail and see that "nothing" yourself, considering you rate the difficulty with the LIDAR steepness alone, not counting cracks, gullies and the terrain I've crossed, while you're judging from a bunch of satellite data.
Road–Runner (2024-11-04 18:48:18+00:00): I have just made my own summary of the changes that have been made here. But it's really a beautiful area. I am not so often in Trentino, but maybe I'll visit it sometime. :-)
Hungerburg (2024-11-04 21:25:29+00:00): @RoadRunner, the videos show what @Superfebs found the easy parts. Likely grade three not referring to UIAA III, so much can be seen too.

Apart from that, I guess I meanwhile understand what the reference to "kompass" means, namely https://www.kompass.de/wanderkarte/ where sentiero 30 is depicted as *waymarked hiking trail*, which it obviously is not.

And that brings us to the other question: Is it enough for a path to be shown on a map, so that i can be mapped in openstreetmap? I always though, openstreetmap being about ground truth, not about copying. And all the parties with local knowledge here agree, that there is nothing on the ground there, no markers, no trampling.

BTW, Kompass maps shows the path quite differently, and others too. Kompass indeed seems to be "indicative" as well ;)
Road–Runner (2024-11-05 01:17:27+00:00): @Hungerburg Unfortunately I don't have time for further discussions and will quit here. But I strongly discourage you from making further changes, as you don't have any local knowledge. Maybe there are cairns, traces? We don't know, the path is by the way also on other hiking maps like 4LAND. Afaik the wrong inference to the UIAA scale was also made by you, right? So I really recommend to leave everything as it is.
supsup (2024-11-05 10:28:04+00:00): There is a signpost for the route at the bottom of the valley accordign to map. So there is something on the ground.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-16 21:44:19+00:00): You're using highway=residential tag
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155205407
silversurfer83 (2024-08-16 06:19:38+00:00): Moin

Du hast deinen Bach an dieser Stelle https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1307533672 mit den umliegenden Landnutzungflächen verklebt. Und da praktisch alle beteiligten Elemente in irgendwelchen Relationen stecken ist ein entkleben mit dem osm.org Editor sehr frickelig.

Diese Objekte (Gewässer, Landuse) gehören nicht verbunden. Achte da in Zukunft bitte drauf. Gleiches gilt für Grenzen. Die sollten auch nur mit anderen Grenzen verbunden werden.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155205708
emersonveenstra (2024-08-13 17:21:49+00:00): Hi there,

Please don't add a building overtop of an existing building. The editor warned you of this when you saved it, please pay attention to those warnings in the future. I've changed it to a node, since it doesn't seem like you actually know the geometry of it
habi (2024-08-28 06:59:51+00:00): Ciao Martin
Laut Webseite ist der Guafför 'nur' an der Brünnenstrasse, dort war dieser schon erfasst.
Oder sind das zwei Filialen, auch eine an der Bümplizstrasse?
Ä Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi
Martin Heistermann (2024-09-08 10:42:31+00:00): Hi habi,
Hab nicht genau aufgepasst und nur die Öffnungszeiten abgeschrieben. Dort ist zwar weiterhin ein Coiffeur (oder Beauty-Salon?), allerdings unter anderem Namen, Haargenau ist wohl umgezogen.
Ich bin gerade in den Ferien, danach kann ich gern dazu schauen.
Danke fuer die Rueckmeldung und Beste Gruesse

Martin
solenoid jam (2024-09-15 06:03:40+00:00): Здравствуйте.
 Не стоило в Крылатском удалять leisure=track, поскольку этот тэг используется для обозначения велотрасс. 
Так же, недопустимо изменять тэги, ради прокладки маршрутов, поскольку карта должна выражать объективные особенности местности, а не быть костылём для работы стороннего софта. 
Однако, в любом случае спасибо за вклад, и хорошего вам дня.
literan (2024-08-13 17:53:01+00:00): лыжероллерная трасса это не тропа.
d1rtyd1sater (2024-08-13 18:48:51+00:00): Но под примеры вполне подходит
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Path_examples
literan (2024-08-13 19:21:49+00:00): я не вижу там примера, где упоминается спортивный трек
AlkalIn (2024-08-16 11:11:03+00:00): Bonjour Jordan pouvez vous svp rétablir les chemins forestiers que vous avez effacés dans ce groupe de modification?
Ceux ci existent toujours, ils étaient basés sur des relevés GPS de terrain.
AlkalIn (2024-08-16 11:32:29+00:00): J'ai aussi commenté votre modification suivante pour les meme raisons: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153959972
Firefishy (2025-06-11 21:46:00+00:00): Has the bridge re-opened to car traffic yet? It seems like it might have. https://www.warwickshire.gov.uk/news/article/5812/bidford-on-avon-river-bridge-repair-works-nearing-completion
Casey_boy (2025-06-13 15:53:07+00:00): I've marked as reopened. Not local but multiple sources (inc council and BBC) indicate it's now open.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9vkevrpk9lo
Brummelwuff (2024-08-13 19:31:28+00:00): Moin, wilkommen bei OSM.
Danke fürs hinzufügen des Spielplatzes.
Achte bitte darauf das du solche Flächen nicht an die Punkte der Wege Klebst, dass erschwert das Spätere bearbeiten!
tsabsch (2024-08-14 18:22:22+00:00): Danke für die Korrekturen und den Hinweis!
Khidistavi (2024-08-14 20:21:29+00:00): Reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155258480
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-13 19:10:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496525746

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kps82 (2024-08-13 20:06:42+00:00): Poprawiłem adres. Mam nadzieję, że teraz będzie OK.
Pozdrawiam
NorthCrab (2024-08-13 22:03:47+00:00): addr:place na pewno jest lepszą opcją :-) Dzięki za szybką poprawkę! Pozdrawiam!
canfe (2026-04-18 15:31:08+00:00): Tutti le vie Via San Rocco - Località Valgaia (878731162) non son corrette.
Se la via ha quel nome non si mette la località come da wiki. La località va messa a parte.
Ti prego di correggere.
citrula (2024-08-15 21:47:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your contributions
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155211100
quincylvania (2024-08-15 01:52:02+00:00): Hi Nick, welcome back to OSM. For your reference, `boundary=national_park` is often used for large area that aren't strictly US National Parks. `leisure=park` is for small municipal parks and the like. I changed the tag to `boundary=protected_area` since that seems most suitable.
YomanNH (2024-08-26 10:21:55+00:00): Jesteś pewny, że ta ścieżka istnieje? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1307560519
36mpxl (2024-08-26 14:31:27+00:00): Poprawiłem i trochę dodałem, korzystając ze zdjęć satelitarnych i Stravy
YomanNH (2024-08-26 14:54:56+00:00): Tam widać świeżo wybudowany dom, albo jeszcze w trakcie budowy. Na Stravie widać, że jedynie dwie osoby tam przeszły i zarejestrowały ślad. Dom może być już ogrodzony i może nie być przejścia.

Sam czasem dodaję drogi na podstawie Stravy, ale nie wtedy, gdy ich istnienie jest tak wątpliwe ;)
36mpxl (2024-08-26 15:02:34+00:00): że tam jest dom w konstrukcji, dodany nawet na lewo od tych dwóch konstrukcji w konstrukcji i bezpiecznie będzie jeszcze przekazywany pomiędzy tymi domami, no cóż, jak to powiedzieć, zawsze można to sprawdzić, jeśli ktoś zostanie rozpoznany na drodze, ale Na podstawie już wprowadzonych zmian budowałbym już swoją trasę, myślę, że albo nastąpi zmiana drogi, albo nadal będzie można jechać lub chodzić drogami, które są uwzględnione na mapie
36mpxl (2024-08-26 15:05:43+00:00): W końcu powstaje wiele miejsc i zmienia się przyjaciel, ale na podstawie dostępnych informacji rysujemy ścieżki tras drogowych, ale w tym przypadku mapy satelitarne i Strava, a kiedy pojawią się inne informacje, że coś się tam zmieniło, cóż, zmiany tam będą wprowadzone
VA00 (2024-10-19 09:34:02+00:00): Do you speak Polish? All of the above is gibberish. 

Returning to path. Adding this kind of path, passing directly via someones private yard, without direct survey on site, is, without good sources, unwelcome. Someone unaware might be directed there via bicycle/foot navigation. While we are not in USA, and you probably do not get shot, dogs attacks, debris and sharp fences are common. For this particular path, I talked to residents yesterday, and they confirm come folks ,,pass through'' their yard, but so far they have no plans to block passage or discourage travelers in any way. In such situation access=permissive is appropriate. To settle passage in formal way is beyond OSM scope and usually require licensed surveyor.
Kamil Kalata (2024-08-16 19:01:24+00:00): Cześć!
Zerknąłem na Twoje ostatnie 3 edycje dotyczące dzielenia obszaru zabudowań i mam kilka uwag.

1. (dotyczy zestawu zmian nr 155210933, wzdłuż ulicy Wypoczynkowej)
Zostawiłeś niedomknięty duży obszar (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226446606/history/25). Wystarczyło wydłużyć linię wzdłuż ulicy Drzymały, po węzłach obszarów przy Wypoczynkowej.

2. (dotyczy zestawu zmian nr 155211315, pierwsza wzdłuż ulicy Strumykowej)
Tutaj zrobiłeś podobnie: nie domknąłeś nowo utworzonego obszaru na południe od Parku Miejskiego (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1307560335/history/1). Jeżeli chciałeś podzielić obszar w tym miejscu na mniejsze, powinieneś był poprowadzić linię po stronie południowej i wschodniej mniejszych obszarów.

3. (dotyczy zestawu zmian nr 155211710, druga wzdłuż ulicy Strumykowej)
Wygląda na to, że próbowałeś podzielić nowo utworzony mniejszy obszar po zachodniej stronie ulicy Strumykowej (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1307561759) dodatkowo na mniejsze części. Zrobiłeś to niezbyt udolnie; połączyłeś linię z samą sobą. Tutaj podobnie: wystarczyło większy obszar (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1307560335) wydłużyć wzdłuż wcześniej wspomnianego obszaru po jego południowej stronie.

Na Discordzie wysłałem Ci kilka zrzutów wyjaśniających.
gymate (2025-09-25 16:47:40+00:00): Szia! Tudtommal ebben a kereszteződésben nincs lámpa. Nem tévesztetted össze esetleg az Ürömi út és a Vasút sor sarkával?
Ltrlg (2024-08-13 19:52:22+00:00): source = Bing ; Ortho HR IGN 2022
s8evq (2024-08-14 08:25:33+00:00): I made a huge changeset by accident, spanning over 1000 km.
clay_c (2024-10-19 00:01:12+00:00): Hi Zol87,

I see some railroad crossings along the surface-running segment of the Brown Line were retagged to crossing:barrier=no here. It appears that these crossings are indeed protected by barriers as previously tagged. Was this an intentional change?
Zol87 (2024-11-05 02:10:57+00:00): I was trying to refer to which sides had the gate arm. specially on one way streets
clay_c (2024-11-06 21:16:15+00:00): While I'm not sure if there's a way to tag that there's no barrier preventing wrong-way drivers from entering the tracks, crossing:barrier=no refers to whether the crossing is protected by barriers in the expected direction of travel. Perhaps each individual barrier=lift_gate could use mapping here.
MFlamm (2024-08-14 09:51:41+00:00): Re-bonjour,
Je vois que vous avez à nouveau catégorisé une route communale en tertiary, malgré (ou suite à?) ma remarque d'hier concernant le chemin du Mottaz. 
Pour information, les règles de catégorisation des routes sont décrites ici: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Switzerland/Map_Features
Et les choix de catégorisation des routes principales dans le canton de Vaud ici: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Switzerland:Vaud/État_des_routes_cantonales
Pensez-vous que ces règles sont inadéquates pour la  catégorisation de la route des Montagnes?
Bien cordialement,
Michael