piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-09-28 07:39:30+00:00): dismount is a big no from me. You don't have to dismount and in practice it's not required. We aren't mapping right of way here. It's going to impede routing a lot.

My suggestion is simple
1) If the we are connecting footways without bicycle access tags, we shouldn't care about bicycle access on a crossing, no need to add it.
2) If we are connecting ways with bicycle access and it's a usual zebra, we add bicycle=yes
3) If we are connecting ways with bicycle access and it's marked with one of the three ways bicycle-pedestrian crossing is marked, then it's bicycle=designated

The advantage of this is that you can see everything from aerial imagery.

This is of course if crossing is mapped separately at all.

About unmarked crossings, they aren't that often mapped as separate ways, but if they are, I think they usually should inherit access tags from connecting ways. Unless it's a crossing with high kerbs, probably not a bicycle=designated.

In the example I've linked https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1115986757 I wouldn't add any bicycle=* tags
dgmapping (2023-09-28 08:19:54+00:00): Most bike routers don't allow cycling on highway=footway anyway, unless there is an addition bicycle yes/designated tag. And I think this is generally a good thing. In this way/1115986757 example, bicycle tag is mostly useless since it only connects pedestrian footways.

I've seen several "kergliiklusteid" that are not properly connected to the rest of cycling network. Meaning crossings are footways without bicycle tag. In such cases it is necessary change it to fix bike routing.

But please, don't use bike dismount unless this is really needed and there are actual signs for that like in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1136290745
Apirnus (2023-09-28 20:02:09+00:00): Dismount is thrown out of the window then.


But if we ignore exceptions, then still we cant map "yes" tag everywhere where is zebra painted since yes tag means its a right of way and cyclists have right of way on crossing in very specific moments, usually when vehicles turn left-right but cyclists go straight or if traffic light gives a right of way. Hence designated tag basically everywhere despite crossing being traffic light regulated or any form of zebra on the crossing.
From this you can deduce and add "yes" only in places where the road crossing has on the rightmost vehicle line an additional right turn line on which there is pedestrian crossing. There cyclists have a right of way and the crossing can be mapped with "yes".

If to compile our conversation then I see it like this:
- example for bicycle=yes (real right of way):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1115256184
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1208793540
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1115090193
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674427759

- example for bicycle=designated (cyclist should dismount to get real right of way. Since we threw dismount out, next best thing is designated tag): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/716963857
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1105864115

The example of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1115986757 where bicycle access tag is pretty much useless is good example where I agree its pretty useless. But there are footways where its very much suitable to cycle on and its the path that needs proper tags and the crossing should then also have those tags for marked or unmarked crossing. So for the first proposal I partly agree.
For the second proposal simply zebra != bicycle=yes. Its not correct way to map since zebra does not give a right of way to the cyclist by itself, it just marks the crossing and that's it.
Same deal with third proposal. The road markings do not give a right of way for a bicycle, not zebra, not other markings. For the other crossing markings that are not pure zebra, they mostly just tell bicycle placement on the crossing. For example the 50% zebra 50% dashed traverse line would separate pedestrians and cyclers on the crossing. Such marking again does not give pure right of way on a crossing. You have to consider traffic lights, traffic flow, turns that are next and around said crossing with such crossing marking.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-09-29 05:39:22+00:00): access tags are not related to the right of way.
Apirnus (2023-09-29 06:14:13+00:00): According to the wiki, access tags indeed relate to the right of way. Right of way is one of the ways to describe legal permission/restriction. Its the highest form of the permission of on the access level.
And if they do not relate, then what do they relate to?
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-09-29 06:59:28+00:00): Can you please link the place where it's written that they relate to right of way? In my understanding they relate to being allowed to traverse the way, not that everyone should yield for you.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-09-29 18:30:13+00:00): It seems "right of way" definition created some confusion.

From Google translate:

1) the legal right, established by usage or grant, to pass along a specific route through grounds or property belonging to another.

2) the legal right of a pedestrian, vehicle, or ship to proceed with precedence over others in a particular situation or place.

You are interpreting what's described with "right of way" as the second definition, while it's the first one in case of your wiki quote.

Access tags are about access, no double meaning.

I'll repeat again: priority does not matter in this case. 

We understand the law the same way, we have different understanding of access tags. Please try to understand the whole context of the wiki article, not a single phrase from it
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
user_5359 (2023-06-18 06:24:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys).
user_18305684 (2023-06-19 23:15:13+00:00): Hi,

the value of the tag natural on the way 976173357 seems strange : what did you want to do ?

Best regards
SvM (2023-06-20 15:24:32+00:00): Fixed it. Thank you
user_18305684 (2023-06-21 14:06:15+00:00): Good work, have a nice day.
jodd (2023-06-21 19:06:30+00:00): Hallo,
kurze Frage: Ist die Camberger Brücke jetzt tatsächlich auch ein Stückchen südlich der Hermann-Eggert-Straße gesperrt? Oder hast du den way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/606473925 aus Versehen mit den Baustellen-tags versehen?
VG Jo
user_5359 (2023-06-24 09:58:35+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/node/5572028382. Why did you use founder_name instead of founder (see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=founder#keys)?
Christian Perrier (2023-06-24 12:23:04+00:00): "founder" has been used, as far as I know, to record the name of people who "founded" (as "created") something, most of the time cities. So, during the work and exchanges I had with another french contributor (namely CyberEric) for this work on statues in Versailles Castle, we decided to used "founder_name" to record the name of arsitsts who melted the metal (most often bronze) statues. This will be doccumented soon by Eric in the wiki
Frans S (2023-06-20 13:19:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please tag the buildings you map and square each of them.
You just draw a few lines per building.
Please check the lessons how to map!
Best regards
leodobrasil (2023-07-07 19:36:43+00:00): Tudo bem Lucas como vai?
Vi esse conjunto de alterações e gostaria de saber a fonte para o nome das fazendas aqui na região de Itapetinga, por exemplo desta aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10983618518 . Abraços Leo https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/leodobrasil
Ale_Zena_IT (2023-06-18 20:24:14+00:00): Hello and welcome in OSM.
It's not a good idea make changes in a so large area (from UK to India).
I was monitoring activities in South Italy and came across your changes,
 Please next time split in two different upload.

Thank you
silversurfer83 (2023-06-19 15:57:04+00:00): Hallo JaidenV

here are some helpful wiki articles for people who just started out. There's also a list of chat groups which are usually very helpful. Please don't hesitate to contact us with questions :)

https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

happy mapping :)
Warin61 (2023-09-26 01:02:17+00:00): Restored bus stop for node 4861436772 ... cable car east end.
canfe (2023-11-17 06:21:24+00:00): Perché mappare i posteggi in modo "puntuale"??
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137471123
silversurfer83 (2023-06-19 15:58:33+00:00): Hi
woher stammt den die Information?
Du hast leider keine Quellenangabe hinterlassen weshalb es nicht nachvollziehbar ist, warum dieses Gebäude "43" heißen soll.
Informationen zu Namen findest du auch hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137471204
mga_geo (2023-06-19 06:02:55+00:00): Bonjour,
Attention, certaines opérations avec iD cassent le tracé des relations route=bus.
Il est préférable d'utiliser JOSM.
Marc
dcapillae (2023-06-18 11:06:16+00:00): Buenas tardes.

Gracias por los cambios. Buen trabajo.

He corregido solo algunos detalles, como conectar las aceras con los viales más cercanos y separarlas de las fachadas de los edificio. También he ajustado con algo más de precisión los contornos del parque.

Si necesita ayuda para empezar a mapear, puede consultar esta guía de principiantes: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide.

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
literan (2023-08-08 07:19:39+00:00): пока тут нет никакого "Востока", это трасса Р-242

когда включат постановлением в "Восток", тогда и включим в базе
Enock4seth (2023-06-18 20:17:15+00:00): thanks for mapping, only map one feature as one. 

Here you have add the name of the guest house to two objects.
Dnshitobu (2023-06-19 23:01:34+00:00): Thank  you for your comment and drawing my attention to this. I will take heed henceforth
Enock4seth (2023-06-18 20:20:57+00:00): addr:city  not needed here where there's no addr:housenumber 

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:city
Taya_S (2023-06-18 12:32:18+00:00): hallo MarcoVer,

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Bedankt voor je eerste twee changesets. Het is echter normaal gesproken niet nodig om oneway=no toe te voegen. Dit is de default waarde. 

Groeten,
Taya
Noen (2023-06-19 13:04:42+00:00): Så det er gratis å parkere her på sommeren, men du må betale etter 6 timer?
Du kan bruke «AND» i store bokstaver, til å kombinere utsagn. Så her skulle det vært "no @ (stay < 6 hours AND summer)". Bruk også gjerne en mer presis tidsangivelse enn "summer", hvis det finnes, slik som "Jun-Aug".
ivarni (2023-06-19 13:26:07+00:00): @Noen

Jeg kan endre men kilden er dessverre ikke mer presis enn at de har "sommerpriser"

https://www.skigeilo.no/parkering

Vestlia har egne sommerpriser:
6 timer alle dager 09.00-21.00 kr 0,-
Over 6 timer makspris kr 80,- 
Over 6 timer etter kl 21.00 kr 300,- 

Det er litt typisk Skigeilo å innføre et system som er så til de grader klønete.
Rainero (2023-06-19 20:12:57+00:00): Hallo Stefan Frevert,

das Restaurant wandert nicht durch ändern der Adresse an die neue Position. Dort, in der Glockenbachstraße 34, ist es bereits seit 13.2. 2022 eingetragen. Daher ist folgende Vorgehensweise am besten:
das Lokal hier von amenity=restaurant auf disused:amenity=restaurant ändern und name auf old_name. Ich mache das mal, dann kannst du dir das über die Historie https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/635920162/history anschauen.
Wenn dann ein neues Restaurant einzieht, kann man das disused wieder entfernen und den neuen Namen und ggf. weitere Attribute setzen und die Historie der Restaurants bleibt erhalten.
Ist da inzwischen ein neues Lokal, der Umzug ist ja schon über ein Jahr her?

Und noch eine Bitte: wir schreiben bei OSM Namen immer aus, also Glockenbachstraße, nicht Glockenbachstr.

Servus,
Rainer
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-07 04:01:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10983746753/history - I changed man_made=water_Well to man_made=water_well

please comment here if original value was intentional or replacement was wrong/should not be done remotely without survey
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-18 10:40:43+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1121882827

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Endres Pelka (2023-06-18 10:59:36+00:00): Poprawione w 137474137
Taya_S (2023-06-18 12:30:49+00:00): hallo jjklop80,

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Groeten,
Taya
ivanbranco (2024-11-04 12:20:45+00:00): Hi Afford Hike,

It looks like some building nodes may have been unintentionally moved while adjusting landuse areas, possibly due to filtering buildings out in JOSM (for example, this node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5776958287/history). When you have a moment, could you check and fix these? Thank you and good mapping!
Afford Hike (2024-11-05 11:40:49+00:00): Hi, it should be fixed now
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158775455
ТатьянаC (2023-06-19 00:29:03+00:00): прекратите портить карту!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ТатьянаC (2023-06-19 00:39:07+00:00): хватит покостить и вносить не верные правки!!!!!!!!!!!!
Warin61 (2023-10-07 00:59:00+00:00): Umm I don't think trees have addresses...
arctic-rocinante (2023-10-07 03:12:13+00:00): Oops, thanks for spotting this. Not done intentionally - I must’ve duplicated an existing tree without noticing it had an address tag.

I’ll have a look over them and clean it up later today or tomorrow 👍
Warin61 (2023-10-07 08:05:04+00:00): I think I got them all ... 
63 done
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142252468
At least the ones you entered.. have check for any others .. found 93 others .. Spanish? mapper... corrected...
arctic-rocinante (2023-10-07 10:02:39+00:00): Yep looks like you got them all, thanks!
Bexhill-OSM (2023-06-18 14:15:55+00:00): Cheers for fix. Appears the name change was over a trademark issue.
AndersAndersson (2023-06-18 17:02:00+00:00): What kind of fix is this?

There was a tag with  a value which said that the wind turbine did not generate electricity.

Now you removed that tag and you lead people to believe that there is a functioning wind turbine that is not completely tagged.
AndersAndersson (2023-06-25 09:09:44+00:00): No comments?
I will put the value back.
gurglypipe (2023-06-18 17:57:37+00:00): Hi, are you importing this data from somewhere?

Curious as to why (for example) you’d delete https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1116256235 and replace it with the lower-resolution https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182851447
Taya_S (2023-06-18 18:55:12+00:00): Hi,

No I'm not importing these from anywhere. I'm just using satellite imagery. You're right, those are higher waterways, and it would have been better if I had just preserved those.
I dont quite remember why I deleted them though I'm afraid. 

I'll give the streams in that area a bit of a touch up.

Sincerely,
Taya
Taya_S (2023-06-18 19:23:56+00:00): Sorry about that btw. It was not my intention to reduce the quality of those waterways.

I've increased the quality om the waterways near the end of the River Conder.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=137490172
gurglypipe (2023-06-19 22:47:41+00:00): That’s fantastic, thank you for coming back and tweaking this :) And thank you for your efforts on tidal areas around Lancashire/Cumbria, it’s looking great!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-15 14:52:22+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10983840078/history has fixme:type = hospital that was added in this edit
is it a doctor office?

or nurse office?

or is it a full scale hospital?

or maybe something else?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhospital
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-15 15:03:53+00:00): Or is it simply a pharmacy?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpharmacy
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-15 14:45:34+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10983839029/history has fixme:type = pharmacy that was added in this edit
Is it simply a pharmacy? Would it be fine to mark it as amenity=pharmacy?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpharmacy
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-09 08:56:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10983826884/history is it a doctor office? Or actually full scale hospital with support for complex surgery, beds for long term stay and so on?
wielandb (2023-10-13 17:27:59+00:00): Hallo,
ich finde, Karl Marx' Kopf als Gebäude zu klassifizieren ist nicht korrekt, was denkst du dazu?
ivanbranco (2023-06-18 14:30:42+00:00): What's the meaning of "updated the Google map"?

Why did you add Google Maps wikidata/wikipedia to this element?: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311295539
ivanbranco (2023-06-18 14:33:48+00:00): You also added Google Translate wiki tags here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178507200 ecc.
user_19420300 (2023-06-18 14:35:23+00:00): Sorry my mistake 🥲
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-02 11:25:31+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10983873318/history has fixme:type = hospital that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
is it a doctor office?

or nurse office?

or is it a full scale hospital?

or maybe something else?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhospital
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-02 11:23:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10983826888/history  is it a doctor office?

or nurse office?

or is it a full scale hospital?

or maybe something else?
pitfire (2023-06-27 06:44:23+00:00): Hi Thomas H aus B,

Please color in English
invalid color in roof:colour tag

VG pitfire
jodd (2023-06-19 18:42:41+00:00): Hallo kaltuna,
warum hast du denn die Telefonzelle gelöscht? Ein anderer Mapper hatte den node kurz zuvor mit einem lifecycle-Präfix versehen, was ich ganz passend fand. Fakt ist, dass die Telefonsäule Ende letzten Woche noch da war, wenn auch außer Betrieb. Unwahrscheinlich, dass sie seitdem ausgegraben wurde. 
VG Jo
kaltuna (2023-06-20 04:23:17+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3723585
Dieser Hinweismarker bewegte mich dazu. Ich hatte mich noch gewundert, warum abandoned benutzt und noch ein operator hinzugefügt wird, wenn sie nach Erinnerung schon länger nicht mehr da sei. Das Lifecycle Tagging finde ich auch praktisch und wichtig bei Objekten, die eine größeres öffentliches Interesse hatten bzw. eine Bedeutung. Das konnte ich einer Telefonzelle nicht direkt zusprechen, sodass ich es passender fand, die node zu löschen.
Schönen Gruß,
kaltuna
GUFSZ (2023-06-21 09:33:01+00:00): Dann stelle den bitte wieder her. Die Telephonzelle steht noch da und den Operator habe ich hinzugefügt, weil ein mechanial edit bzgl. der Telekomtelephonzellen wegen der generellen Abschaltung geplant war.
Und das Tagging war im selben Diskussionsfaden für diese Zellen vorgeschlagen.
Ja und ich bin extra vorbeigelaufen. Meiner Meinung nach wäre es respektvoller gewesen, Du hättest nachgefragt.
 Stellst Du es wieder her oder soll ich revertieren?
kaltuna (2023-06-21 09:44:44+00:00): Ich habe das Changeset revertiert. Für mich stellte es sich so dar, als sei sie tatsächlich nicht mehr existent, weil auch kein Kommentar mehr im Hinweismarker war, dass sie doch noch da sei aber nicht mehr operativ und daher abandoned eingetragen wurde.
GUFSZ (2023-06-21 10:16:33+00:00): Meiner Erinnerung nach ist die Telefonzelle schon länger nicht mehr da. Bitte kontrollieren.
Und hoffe, wir sind uns einig: "Meiner Erinnerung nach ist die Telefonzelle schon länger nicht mehr da. Bitte kontrollieren." ist keine sonderlich eindeutige Aussage.
jodd (2023-06-21 19:25:14+00:00): Danke für die Wiederherstellung. Ich halte es in letzter Zeit so (ebenfalls in Anlehnung an die Diskussion im Forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/anfang-2023-werden-alle-offentlichen-telefone-der-telekom-in-de-abgeschaltet):

Wenn das Telefon abgeschaltet ist, aber äußerlich unversehrt aussieht, wird es disused:amenity=telephone. Wenn es nicht mehr unversehr ist, weil z.B. der Hörer nicht mehr vorhanden, dann wird es abandoned:amenity=telephone

VG Jo
Vinber-Pro (2023-06-20 15:23:41+00:00): Salut,
saut entre 2 villes avec OsmAnd :) cela fait de grand changeset :)
Clin d'oeil juste, car je parlais de toi ce matin et de l'immense travail sur Fiana que tu as pu mener !
à plus
Privatemajory (2023-07-03 10:52:17+00:00): Oui oui c'étaient des endroits sur le chemin lors d'une mission ;-)
Edelsalami (2023-06-21 11:55:21+00:00): Hallo Nordgork, du hast in diesem ChangeSet etliche Wege eingetragen, die nicht notwendig sind und dem Standard widersprechen: so werden parallel laufende Wege nur als getrennte Linien eingetragen, wenn diese baulich getrennt sind, also man nicht von einer auf den anderen wechseln kann. Siehe auch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribuierung_von_Stra%C3%9Fen_in_Deutschland#Getrennte_Linien

Was im Prospekt der Stadt abgebildet ist, ist in diesem Zusammenhang irrelevant. Bitte entferne die überflüssigen Linien doch wieder aus OSM. Vielen Dank!

Gruß
Nordgork (2023-06-21 14:33:56+00:00): Guten Tag ich werde mich am Wochenende darum kümmern thx für dein Feedback
Langlaeufer (2023-06-18 16:33:17+00:00): Hallo Rollo,
willkommen bei OSM. Leider ist deine Bearbeitung nicht ganz o.k. Die A2 Richtungsfahrbahn war und ist an der Stelle 3-spurig. Zum reg_name gibt es einen note. "Der reg_name, sowie ggf. der loc_name sind dem zugehörigen Wikipediaartikel entnommen."  Wenn du den Namen entfernst wäre es angemessen auf den Kommentar aus der Note einzugehen.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137477843
Langlaeufer (2023-06-18 16:59:26+00:00): Diskussion zu Warschauer Allee hier: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/a2-reg-name-warschauer-allee/100263
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137477843
aharvey (2024-09-02 03:46:50+00:00): Thanks for your edits here, though I noticed you've used a lot of multipolygon relations eg. the parking areas, which I feel make editing more complicated. Is there a reason these couldn't just be ways which share nodes so the boundaries are snapped together?
AndrewS (2024-09-02 09:08:26+00:00): I don't recall exactly, but I usually try to do enclosed areas as relations, eg the Fairfax walk carpark to the east has to be a relation as it's fully enclosed by the natural wood area. The other car parks to the west are also enclosed but with an accompanying grass area (yes, this then makes the relation tricky to edit later). 
How else could enclosed areas be mapped? 
I didn't do the Q Station resort grassed areas but the messy white boundary areas are the editor avoiding both shared nodes and relations. I would have done that with relations :) The water/pond and cemeteries around there should also be relations.
I haven't edited for a while so I may have the jargon and protocols mixed up.
aharvey (2024-10-01 05:41:07+00:00): Sorry for the late reply. You can have overlapping ways which share nodes (that helps with the topology and keeps it neat and tidy). That would be simpler here, you can also reuse a way as relation inner. eg. car park as a way, and re-use that as a wood relation inner. I think shared nodes between different ways rather than creating relations is easier to manage, but does come down to editing style.
silversurfer83 (2023-06-19 16:02:14+00:00): Ah. Jetzt verstehe das mit den Namen.
Da es im gesamten Klinikbereich aktuell so gehandhabt wird, ist es erstmal in Ordnung.

Nichtsdestotrotz ist eine Quellenangabe zu den Änderungen trotzdem immer hilfreich. Vergleiche auch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137478365