piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jambamkin (2026-06-17 11:58:33+00:00): Hi Kapazoa, 
I hope that you can see that I'm one of the good actors and not malicious. All my mistakes are genuine :D. Thanks for checking my work.
James
b-jazz (2025-05-10 16:00:48+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385096281

Please don't use the "lollipop" style of mapping golf course elements as you've done in the URL above. You need to create proper multipolygon relations in order to map features like roughs/bunkers that are within other features like fairways. Please see https://osm.wiki/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls and https://osm.wiki/wiki/Relation:multipolygon for help in understanding how to map this situation. If those aren't clear, please let me know and I'll help explain them further. Thanks.
mfdz (2025-06-07 12:39:57+00:00): Hi @NVBW_Edit_ToniE,

this parking formerly had a park_ride=train tag. Isn't this a park_ride? If not, could you please add an explicit park_ride=no?
ToniE (2025-06-07 16:36:40+00:00): Ist nicht in den "Parkplatz"-Daten von NVBW enthalten. Daher hatte ich angenommen, dass das ein "privater/customer" Parkplatz ist.
Ich werde der alten Zustand wieder herstellen.

Danke  und Gruß
Toni
NVBW_Seifert (2025-06-10 07:20:41+00:00): wir lassen Parkplätze und Fahrradanlagen an diesem Bahnhof in 2025 neu erfassen
eggie (2025-05-09 15:43:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM,
Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution.
Greetz,
eggie
X-HS (2025-05-09 20:07:40+00:00): Sorry eggie, saw my mistake too late. I forgot to activate the POI-tourism layer so I didn’t see the hotel. I thank you for correcting. I‘ll be more careful next time !
eggie (2025-05-09 20:19:30+00:00): No problem 😀
Zatigem (2025-05-10 10:08:45+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour les contributions.

Pour les prochaines, pourriez-vous publier des changements que pour une meme ville ou au pire un même département?
Voir aussi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Merci
anne_geovelo (2025-05-11 19:08:13+00:00): Bonjour, 
C'est ce que je fais habituellement. Nous traitons beaucoup de notes. Ici il s'agit d'un oubli d'envoi de changeset entre deux traitements de contributions.
Cordialement.
VLD549 (2025-05-25 12:55:46+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes, and the name (and the mapping) Friethoek Heino is correct. However, the link provided mentions a snackbar in Raalte.
Perhaps you can add the correct link:
https://bestellen-friethoekheino-nl.cms-point.nl/#patat  
?

I don't know how to do it. :) 

Thank you!
IByte (2025-05-25 18:53:11+00:00): Thanks for mentioning it. I updated the website link. (I forgot to do that when I changed the name. I was on a mobile app I don't normally use, usually I do this using iD on the desktop OSM website.)
VLD549 (2025-06-04 14:24:42+00:00): Thank you!
eggie (2025-05-09 15:20:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2025-05-09 21:03:06+00:00): Dan staat de nummering bij de gemeente ook verkeerd om in de BAG.
Dat kun je hier zien en melden:
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=85431.6826000324&geometry.y=444912.57841845317&zoomlevel=14.418432253730098
gscholz (2025-05-12 06:06:46+00:00): Hi Decarvalho7,
your recent changesets have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-56.01512&lat=-4.26293&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

As you may know, htis kind of errors irritates routing software and looks ugly n the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
R Felix (2025-05-09 15:39:53+00:00): Verificar se para além da alteração de toponímia não foi criada uma linha duplicada por engano
topolusitania (2025-05-10 23:20:20+00:00): Rua duplicada. Corrigido
George Sears (2025-05-09 18:46:41+00:00): Ciao vedo che hai cambiato il campo "name" ai binari
Guardando la wiki mi sembra di capire che name si riferisce al nome della fermata, in questo caso in realtà sarebbe stato semplicemente Barletta, come viene indicata da Trenitalia
il numero del binario è su "ref" invece
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_position

Inoltre hai messo i tag relativi al McDonald's sia sull'edificio che su un punto, effettivamento duplicando l'informazione. Dovresti rimuovere le informazioni dell'attività dall'edificio.
Comunque non c'era bisogno di cancellare il nodo già esistente e crearne un altro, sempre parlando del McDonald's.
Se hai qualunque dubbio ti invito ad unirti al gruppo telegram dove sono disponibilissimi a risponderti:
https://telegram.me/OpenStreetMapItalia
MassCartog (2025-05-09 16:12:56+00:00): Hello welcome to OSM. The trails you removed in this changeset seems valid. If it exist on the ground should not be removed from OSM, regardless if its private or public, designated or informal.

These trails do seem to exist on the ground, They are visible from aerial imagery and show they are being used from heatmap data.

In OSM we don't remove features that exist. Please read for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

You also removed them in a way that left gaps in the trail that lead to "Peace Valley Overlook Trail". Please make sure you follow OSM editing best practices, and don't remove features that exist on the ground.

The correct way to handle this in OSM is to use the tagging system. access=no seems to apply here. Once this is done services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access. 

I have restored the these trails, please use the tagging system if you think its appropriate, also please cite a reference or source. Thanks!
Lowe_IDFG (2025-05-15 14:47:02+00:00): The trail leading from Peace Valley Overlook has been obliterated. It will still show up on aerial imagery looking like a trail, but it no longer exists as such. The Dog Head trail likely fits your suggestion of access=no.
rskedgell (2025-05-10 06:38:11+00:00): It was already tagged as building=yes, so this may not be the cause of any 3D rendering problems you may be experiencing. What rendering software are you using?

Removing tourism=attraction won't help, I'm not sure why you removed this tag.
eggie (2025-05-09 16:02:44+00:00): Commentaar moest zijn schoolterrein toegevoegd
rskedgell (2025-05-10 06:42:11+00:00): How does changing the (correct) building=commercial to building=yes relate to your changeset comment?

Where you added layer=1 in response to an issue flagged by the iD editor, this didn't solve the problem. It just hid it to make kit harder for someone else to find and resolve. This isn't entirely your fault, because the way the editor presents solutions to the problem of a building and highway crossing is very poorly designed.
rskedgell (2025-05-10 06:46:16+00:00): Removing office=company was quite correct, as it's not the office of a single company. Thanks for spotting and fixing that.
Valerio_Bozzolan (2026-02-21 14:28:38+00:00): Ciao! sempre io :D Scusa sto semplicemente girando per Brescia e trovando punti duplicati. Non ce l'ho con te. Annoto che ho eliminato anche questa farmacia a Brescia e unita con quella di fianco a pochi centimetri e creata anni prima. A disposizione :D
jcarlson (2025-05-09 16:58:13+00:00): not sure what you did editing this one, but watch out. you converted to adjacent closed ways into weird multipolygons
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166035941
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-17 02:31:01+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705
Ropino (2025-05-14 13:20:38+00:00): Hi,
please check/correct:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385121030
lanes=70 ?
could be maxspeed?
SpinOff (2025-05-09 19:34:13+00:00): Hej. Skąd pomysł na nadanie takiej dziwnej wartości tagowi width? Chodzi o "2-6 Wody Polskie nw Żywiec"
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:56:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
Mannivu (2025-05-09 21:18:44+00:00): Ciao e grazie per l'aggiunta. Un dubbio: quell'area è destinata a ospitare sempre gazebo e camper o solo temporaneamente? Nel primo caso non c'è problema (qualche tag da sistemare, ma poca roba), ma nel secondo caso non è da mappare su OSM perché vanno indicate solo cose che hanno un certa stabilità.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166038248
Mannivu (2025-05-10 10:15:32+00:00): Annullato per aver rimosso un parcheggio

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166062270
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:53:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
citrula (2025-05-09 20:31:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution!
eggie (2025-05-09 18:25:54+00:00): Dag Ictvangils.

Wellicht even hier kijken wat de bedoeling is van description:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description

MVG
eggie
Muhmaker (2025-05-11 07:43:46+00:00): Moin. Ich habe deine Bearbeitung der Naturpark Grenze hier gesehen. Ich bin aufgrund eines Notes auch schon auf die recht grobe Lage der Grenzen hier aufmerksam geworden und habe das grundsätzlich auch auf meiner todo-Liste. Meine Frage ist nun ob du weitere Bearbeitungen an der Grenze in nächster Zeit planst. Ich möchte vermeiden, dass wir uns gegenseitig die Arbeit kaputt machen. Ich denke ich habe auch eine Quelle gefunden, die lizenzmäßig in Ordnung ist. Und da wahrscheinlich einige Grenzlinien von Flächen oder sogar Wegen entklebt werden müssen, würde ich vorschlagen, dass ich das mit JOSM in den nächsten Tagen mal angehe. Es sei denn du bestehst jetzt darauf, dass es dein nächstes Großprojekt werden soll.
DeFra85 (2025-05-11 08:58:08+00:00): Nee, kannst ruhig loslegen. Ich hatte nur zufällig diesen komischen Schlenker um den Bielefelder Botanischen Garten gesehen
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-17 02:31:02+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705
MxxCon (2025-05-10 03:14:16+00:00): Hello.
Are you sure those kerbs inside of kbcc are lowered? Satellite imagery doesn't show that.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166039176
MxxCon (2025-05-10 03:15:09+00:00): Also, you tagged crossing:island=no on a kerb..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166039176
I-Izzo (2025-10-07 15:51:34+00:00): Do be clear are you talking about the ones on Perry Ave? Also, sorry for the late reply I haven't received any notifications or emails. I looked at all the highlighted kerbs and I the one on the island on the right side appears to be lowered based on the shadows and how it appears to slope in but the 2014 Street side imagery it does more look like a flat kerb. I can make the adjustment now!
I-Izzo (2025-10-07 16:00:07+00:00): For the second comment, I did not see any kerbs with that tagging unless it has already been changed.
MxxCon (2025-10-07 17:39:59+00:00): Regarding crossing island, I was referring to node/12823905500
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166039176
MxxCon (2025-10-07 17:47:15+00:00): Looking at some of the local photos, it does look like those kerbs are "lowered" on all the nodes that you edited here. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166039176
literan (2025-05-11 12:41:02+00:00): "Сцена" это не имя собственное. Почитайте, пожалуйста:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#%D0%98%D0%BC%D1%8F_%E2%80%93_%D1%8D%D1%82%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B8_%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-09 18:31:10+00:00): Why you add massive number of weird nodes like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12823924849/history ?

What is the meaning of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12823924849/history ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-09 18:32:04+00:00): Is this automated edit discussed anywhere at all?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-09 18:46:32+00:00): reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166039325

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166041737
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-09 18:53:36+00:00): Also, please read and follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-09 19:03:31+00:00): It appears that this automated edit tried to edit nodes, instead it duplicated it.

Fortunately, rate limiting kicked in after 100 000 edits limiting damage.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-09 22:10:24+00:00): and they did 100 000 more of bad edits

I PMed them and wrote to DWG
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-09 22:11:09+00:00): 🇨🇿 Roman Horník: when you do automated edits you really should look at some edits at least whether they do what you wanted
🇨🇿 Roman Horník (2025-05-09 23:11:52+00:00): Thanks for the warning, I thought that this only removes ‘source=HELP SERVICE - REMOTE SENSING spol. s r.o. http://www.bnhelp.cz’ from nodes and paths, that no new ones are created.
If it is possible to revert all these modifications I made yesterday from JOSM, please do, and I will be much more careful next time.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-09 18:47:28+00:00): reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166039325

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166041764
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-09 18:48:20+00:00): reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166039325

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166041798
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-09 18:49:52+00:00): reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166039325

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166041849
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-09 18:57:40+00:00): reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166039325

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166042143
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-09 18:51:25+00:00): reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166039325

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166041903
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-09 18:52:52+00:00): reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166039325

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166041940
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-09 18:53:31+00:00): reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166039325

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166041963
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-09 18:54:36+00:00): reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166039325

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166042009
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-09 18:40:52+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166041578
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-17 02:31:03+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-17 02:31:04+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-17 02:34:24+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746
Znaika (2025-10-07 11:29:27+00:00): Hi,
irgendwas stimmt hier mit Hausnummern nicht.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1310486107
DU hast 12/1, 12/2, 14/1, 14/2, 16/1 und 16/2 vergeben. Aber diese Hausnummer sind hier neben an bereits eingetragen. Nun ist es doppelt. Was ist richtig? Was ist deine Quelle? Gruß, Znaika
edihoo (2025-10-16 21:32:58+00:00): Das war ein Fehler meinerseits, und hab ihn bereits korrigiert. Ich hab sie auf lgl-bw mit den gegenüberliegenden Häusern verwechselt. Die betroffenen Häuser haben laut lgl-bw noch keine Hausnummer. Danke für den Hinweis!
SpinOff (2025-05-09 19:33:06+00:00): Hej. Według Geoportalu ta ulica nazywa się "Na wzgórzu". Została ona zmieniona?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-17 02:34:25+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718746
IvicaBanovac (2025-05-13 12:40:08+00:00): Reverted because of wrong tags #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166200757
IvicaBanovac (2025-05-13 12:44:07+00:00): Reverted because of wrong tags #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166200958
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-09 18:20:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2611599616
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248676381

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SpinOff (2025-05-09 19:30:17+00:00): Hej. Kilka pytań:
 - dlaczego dodane ogrodzenie przecina drogę?
- dlaczego dodanego ogrodzenie nie widać na zdjęciach lotniczych?
uprkos (2025-05-10 10:52:37+00:00): Ogrodzenie rzeczywiście się ostatnio pojawiło (nie ma go jeszcze na orto). Poprawiłem jednak jego geometrię oraz dodałem bramy i dostępy.
SpinOff (2025-05-10 12:17:01+00:00): Dzięki :)
SpinOff (2025-05-09 19:41:42+00:00): Hej. Ten parking nie powinien być zmapowany w taki sposób. Chodzi o te alejki: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385140766

Lepiej oznaczyć cały ten parking jako obszar z tagami amenity=parking, parking=surface
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:54:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
SpinOff (2025-05-09 19:27:07+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Syl (2025-05-09 21:12:24+00:00): Bonjour, l'info sur l'accès réservé dans le camping aurait sa place avec access=customers plutôt qu'en description. Et dans ce cas pas besoin de préciser qu'il est dans le camping, le nœud est à l'intérieur de l'enceinte.
symac (2025-05-10 08:36:55+00:00): Je n'avais pas pensé au access:customer, je viens de l'ajouter et j'ai allégé la description en gardant l'information d'accès aux usagers du camping. C'est redondant et pas idéal mais je ne prends pas encore en compte les access sur mon site réutilisant ces données et j'aimerais bien que l'info apparaisse : https://www.boites-a-livres.fr/ville/saint-galmier/42330/boite-14179 (mais je tacherai de repasser sur les public_bookcases avec access dès que j'aurai changé mon site pour nettoyer tout ce qui pourrait être redondant
streckenkundler (2025-05-10 20:31:14+00:00): Ich habe dieses CS revertet.

Bitte zwingend beachten: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Darüberhinaus wurden mit diesem CS Grenz-Geometrien massiv beschädigt. Du arbeitest mit iD.  Da zur Erklärung: iD hat sehr oft ein Problem mit dem OSM-Datentyp Relation und schrottet das gerne mal, ohne  das der Nutzer es merkt..

streckenkundler
StreetSurveyor (2025-05-11 14:38:55+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM. I have personally surveyed this and while there is a gate. It is commonly left open. I have adjusted the access to permissive since this access more accurately reflects the ground truth. Happy mapping!
rempshaener (2025-05-10 07:37:04+00:00): Hallo,
eine kurze Frage: sicher, dass die Straße überhaupt bzw. auf der ganzen Länge Lüttenglehner Straße heißt?
Viele Grüße
Sporn2005 (2025-05-10 11:30:21+00:00): Hallo,
das die Straße so heisst, bin ich mir ziemlich sicher. 
z.B.
-passt es von den Hausnummern ins Schema der Lüttenglehner Straße.
- Die Gebäude mit der Nr. 41 a-c, 47 /a, 45 und 43a könnten dann ja gar keine Adresse haben.
- Es steht dort auch nichts davon, das es eine Privatstr. ist.

Da in Deutschland Straßen meist an Kreuzungen oder T-Kreuzungen "Enden" bin ich davon ausgegangen, das die ganze Straße so heißt und es auch keinen sinmachen würde den Teil der Straße ohne Bebauung einen anderen Namen zu geben.
rempshaener (2025-05-14 16:37:34+00:00): Hallo,
die Tatsache, dass an der Straße Hausnummern vergeben sind, die zur Lüttenglehner Straße gehören, heißt nicht, dass umgekehrt die Straße so heißt. Bei OSM zählt ausschließlich das On-the-ground-truth-Prinzip. Und da kein Ende der Straße beschildert ist, hat die Straße streng genommen – im OSM-Sinne – keinen Namen.
Ich habe aber einen Kompromiss gefunden.
highway=unclassified war ohnehin falsch; die Straße hat keinen Verbindungscharakter. Aus Norden sind nur Anlieger zugelassen, aus Süden nur landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr (und Radfahrer). Entsprechend ist der nördliche Teil highway=residential – mit Namen, auch wenn das nicht ganz richtig ist – und der südliche highway=track. Das gibt sowohl die verkehrliche Bedeutung als auch die Beschilderung am bester wieder.
Viele Grüße
AndyB_66 (2025-05-10 11:22:19+00:00): Jeszcze raz - stosuj się, proszę, do zasad komentowania zestawów zmian: osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
AndyB_66 (2025-05-10 11:22:06+00:00): Jeszcze raz - stosuj się, proszę, do zasad komentowania zestawów zmian: osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
CurlingMan13 (2025-05-31 01:05:51+00:00): CS popped up in OSMCHA.  Good edit.  Keep up the awesome work!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166044736
tobych (2025-05-31 02:23:19+00:00): Thanks!
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-05-13 08:59:27+00:00): Can you double check the name of the bus station on node 1363981093, does not look correct
ivanbranco (2025-05-13 09:04:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1363981093
Thomaso58 (2025-05-13 09:22:17+00:00): Hi Aleksandear. Yes it is a spelling error from my side. You have seen the it was in Trento. I will correct that, but there is an additional problem that was, I assume, the reason for the spelling error. 
There are other spelling errors. 
The Muoversi app says Trento off conotter. google maps says Trento Loc. Conotter. I assume its an spelling error in the APP. This app is the only official source for bus-stops name in this region that I know. I assume there are different names used for the same bus stop.
I wanted to check all after 2 weeks once again. This error I would have detectet, but not the different namings. 
BR for your remark.
Thomaso58 (2025-05-13 09:32:09+00:00): Hi 
It is corrected. The correct name is Trento Loc. Conotter. It is a spelling error in the app. 
BR Thomas
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-05-13 09:55:22+00:00): Awesome job!!!
txemt (2025-05-10 17:12:32+00:00): Are you sure that this road segment doesn't exist? Have you gotten eyes on it and know that it doesn't cross US-27? I ask because I've found two different imageries that show it does connect.
Udarian (2025-05-10 19:03:43+00:00): Bing street side in the area is multiple years out of date while Esri and Miami dade county latest area significantly more up to date. This is due to construction in the area, for more info see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_p__df2Kvuk , https://www.fdotmiamidade.com/okeechobee and https://okeechobeeprojectmap.com/ . As a final note passed the intersection with HEFT the work the Lyft team has done in the area is more accurate then the imagery, once the Miami dade county latest updates (likely in August with imagery from December) I will do another pass through the area cleaning up what every needs it to be best of my ability).
txemt (2025-05-10 19:09:48+00:00): I'm ok with that answer. I saw that Bing and ERSI both have conflicting imagery and the date on ERSI shows Jan 2024. I've seen a few different street views as well and they all differ, which is why I was asking about "eyes on." 

I've turned off at FL 997 (I know, just before this intersection in question), so I haven't passed by through there. I won't make any changes, and if I happen to pass near there again, I'll sneak a peak.
Yog Sot (2025-05-09 22:38:32+00:00): przywróciłem dwukierunkowosc i dodałem jedna relacje zakazu jazdy prosto
ilias_ (2025-05-10 13:37:53+00:00): You can’t just completely change the name in French and Arabic but keep the old name in Tamazight… now the French and Arabic names are completely different from the Tamazight name. It’s okay to remove it if you don’t know the translation, it’s better than to have an error in there!