piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
4TL4S (2026-05-07 19:13:15+00:00): Hi rarad74,

Thanks for reaching out. In this changeset, I didn’t make any alignment updates and just removed an overlapping way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1473691549).

I’ll keep GPX tracks in mind, alongside imagery references for future edits. Thanks!
dankarran (2026-05-06 08:31:38+00:00): I've noticed in recent years local businesses are increasingly moving away from keeping up their own sites and just relying on third parties.
dankarran (2026-05-06 15:46:44+00:00): The company looks like it was struck off earlier this year, so unclear if it's still in business: https://services.gov.im/ded/services/companiesregistry/viewcompany.iom?Id=3HUXg%2fmYlSthUc%2fVhwXM%2fg%3d%3d
dmjab13 (2026-05-06 19:17:34+00:00): how did you update 2 things and create such a large bounding box?
BubbaJuice (2026-05-06 02:18:16+00:00): Avoid connecting roadways to landuse or boundaries. Also, make sure that when you are updating something, like a road, that any other objects that made have changed are updated to. So for example, there was a trailhead parking lot (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/855741080) that now is gone because of the construction, and thus should be removed. I've updated these in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182274121.
felipeeugenio (2026-05-06 15:37:46+00:00): Hola. Mas de la mitad del bosque que dibujó, no es un bosque. Por favor no hacer dibujos esquemáticos.
Tampoco la idea es hacer un trabajo de precisión topográfica, pero con algunos minutos mas de deicación se puede hacer un bosque mucho mejor.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182272897
felipeeugenio (2026-05-06 15:49:22+00:00): En el sendero dibujado en Zapallar mismo, las trazs strava indican que los caminos son bastante distintos. Voy a modificar eso. Además voy a redibujar su bosque, que más parece un arbusto que un bosque.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182272897
BubbaJuice (2026-05-06 02:07:50+00:00): Yeah don't map turn lanes separately unless there is a physical barrier. To map turn lanes, refer to the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-05-06 13:49:37+00:00): Hi!

There are indeed 3 lanes there, with a transition from 0 to full width on third lane, see the transition tags and width:lanes:start/end

I fixed it.
grawat_Lyft (2026-05-08 00:43:14+00:00): Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy,
My name is Gaurav, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Sorry for the confusion, and thank you so much for your insight and for fixing the error. You’re absolutely right — there are three lanes there, as indicated by the transition tags and the width:lanes:start/end values. I’ll be more cautious when uploading changesets in the future.
Thank you for your contribution to OSM!
Regards,
Gaurav
Baloo Uriza (2026-05-11 12:28:36+00:00): If this is on the mast-arm, the camera is likely the video traffic detection camera for the signal controller and not a flock camera.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182273800
Wingender (2026-05-11 16:23:23+00:00): I appreciate the input, but I know exactly what a Flock camera looks like. Just because a camera is mounted on a mast-arm doesn't automatically mean it's for the signal controller. It’s completely reasonable to think that whoever installs these might place them in specific spots to make them harder to spot. In this specific instance, the Flock camera was tucked directly behind the stoplight on the mast, aiming south.
Wildsharky (2026-05-08 06:26:16+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:182364267
Eh10075 (2026-05-06 02:35:37+00:00): Before committing this change. The thrift store is actually the building just next door (east of this one). I am not sure if the stadium properties is located here anymore. 

Can someone who has the know-how put this poi on the place next to it. The address is correct, they seem to occupy the same address. Maybe different suites though? I'll investigate tomorrow. I should be driving by sometime tonorrow.
dmjab13 (2026-05-06 19:17:06+00:00): please keep edits like this concentrated to a specific area
John Pole (2026-05-06 19:20:35+00:00): Should I revert and resubmit as individual change sets? Not a big deal, and happy to do so if that’s helpful
dmjab13 (2026-05-06 19:26:06+00:00): at this point, it's fine, but try not to do this in a future. changesets should not span multiple continents, regardless if they are simple edits or not
pwbriggs (2026-05-07 18:05:55+00:00): Is there a gate for the trail? If so, the trail should likely be kept, with updated details as needed.
mtngeoff (2026-05-07 23:01:06+00:00): There is a fence with a gap. Looking at Google satellite view, the "trail" inside the fence is an arbitrary line, not a trail. I was told by a school district employee there that access beyond that fence is limited, and it seems odd that a trail would cross a track for athletic competition at a random spot on a curve. I believe my edit reflects more accurately what exists in the real world.
pwbriggs (2026-05-08 03:48:56+00:00): Sounds good then, thanks!

One note of caution, don't use Google's imagery or data when working on OpenStreetMap. There are copyright issues with doing so. If you're interested in that topic, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data? — basically, there are some very hard rules, and then a lot of fuzzy boundaries (if you just reference it, is it really a derivative work, etc.). But with OpenStreetMap, we try to steer clear of anything legally ambiguous or in untested waters, because the project can't afford a lawsuit. Thanks for understanding.
mtngeoff (2026-05-08 05:01:48+00:00): Good to know, and noted. I didn't use it as a source of information or actual mapping, but only referred to it as an easily available place to see what I was talking about. But I understand what you are saying, and I won't do that in the future. As you may have guessed, I am new at this.
pwbriggs (2026-05-08 05:13:00+00:00): No problem, you're all good.
Foxscotch (2026-05-06 02:40:50+00:00): actually survey instead of local knowledge :3
dmjab13 (2026-05-06 19:16:43+00:00): dawg, do not submit changesets like this that span the entire globe
VictorIE (2026-05-13 05:05:37+00:00): I agree with dmjab.
Darnight14 (2026-05-06 02:56:02+00:00): 街道
ScrawnyMeowth1 (2026-05-06 13:06:21+00:00): ♥️
watmildon (2026-05-06 17:00:10+00:00): Thanks! I've been on a bit of a tear recently working on some new tooling to make TIGER review less horribly tedious.
nilloc29 (2026-05-19 04:59:33+00:00): Awesome. I have been cleaning up the tags of roads I update using LIDAR.

One thing I have noticed is that so many USFS roads are named in the format "National Forest Development Road 001" rather than "Forest Road 1234-001". I do not have the skills but I think there must be a way to match them to the USFS roads layer based on overlap and do a script to update the name.
Wildsharky (2026-05-08 06:26:51+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:182364489
felipeeugenio (2026-05-06 15:33:08+00:00): Buenísimo, gracias por las ediciones. Eso sí por favor preocuparse de los tildes.
Ya los corregí todos.
saludos
Saldepuedes (2026-05-06 21:42:44+00:00): Ups. Debo admitir que soy malo con los tildes. Tratare de verificar la ortografía a través de otro software.
StC (2026-05-09 09:34:12+00:00): Ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre en créant un trou dans l'itinéraire. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
MacDony (2026-05-09 09:56:30+00:00): Bonjour Stc,
Ok, merci et désolé ;)
Denis
FajrAl (2026-05-06 22:12:28+00:00): reverted in changeset/182285837
FajrAl (2026-05-06 09:23:40+00:00): reverted in changeset/182285837
StC (2026-05-09 09:31:03+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre en prolongeant un chemin au-delà de son raccordement avec le chemin suivant dans l'itinéraire. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
MacDony (2026-05-09 09:57:04+00:00): Ok
mavl (2026-05-07 15:03:54+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, зачем нужен дубликат памятника-паровоза в виде линии, если он уже обозначен в виде точки?  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1509680379  
  
И разве памятника-паровозы обозначают линиями?  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:historic%3Dlocomotive
pesec (2026-05-08 04:49:16+00:00): Здравствуйте.
полигонами.
поправил.
mavl (2026-05-08 05:35:41+00:00): Обозначение памятника точкой - не ошибка. Удалять его не нужно было. Добавлять вместо него полигон большого смысла нет.
stosh77 (2026-05-28 03:54:38+00:00): I have corrected the details.
FajrAl (2026-05-06 09:16:37+00:00): duplicate, reverted in changeset/182282200
nadiaulfi (2026-05-06 05:00:00+00:00): oh gitu nin
FajrAl (2026-05-06 09:20:06+00:00): Ini perubahan yang fatal karena mengubah banyak jalan dengan geometri yang salah.
FajrAl (2026-05-06 22:52:35+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182285837
goldfndr (2026-05-07 19:18:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014189862 ref=315164-163145 should almost certainly be ref=315164-163945 to fit with the others.
goldfndr (2026-05-07 19:22:19+00:00): Note that many (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014189841 ) also have ref:pse and/or ref:qwest values. If there's better tagging, please feel free to update for consensus matching.
FajrAl (2026-05-06 09:19:37+00:00): OpenStreetMap bukanlah tempat bercanda. Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182283260
FajrAl (2026-05-06 22:10:02+00:00): Perlu diketahui, OpenStreetMap bukanlah tempat bercanda.
reverted in changeset/182285837
rajdhani (2026-05-08 02:11:36+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:182362599
FajrAl (2026-05-06 22:10:23+00:00): Perlu diketahui, OpenStreetMap bukanlah tempat bercanda.
reverted in changeset/182285837
FajrAl (2026-05-06 22:11:03+00:00): Perlu diketahui, OpenStreetMap bukanlah tempat bercanda.
reverted in changeset/182285837
FajrAl (2026-05-06 09:18:43+00:00): duplicate with way/1266058705, reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182282502
FajrAl (2026-05-06 09:18:59+00:00): Duplicate with way/120651592, reverted in changeset/182282392
FajrAl (2026-05-06 09:16:48+00:00): duplicate, reverted in changeset/182282105
kingkingHK (2026-05-16 08:38:38+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182730871
Kovoschiz (2026-05-06 07:16:53+00:00): Please don't mix up villages with estates. They are irrelevant.
Kovoschiz (2026-05-06 07:18:06+00:00): 2. Please stop making what would be `old_name=` in that `place=` as `loc_name=`
FajrAl (2026-05-06 07:43:32+00:00): operator=Universitas Gajah Mada, bukan Nabila Salsabila
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182277800
FajrAl (2026-05-06 07:42:05+00:00): Perlu diketahui data OSM bersifat publik. Sebaiknya tidak menambahkan nama pemilik rumah.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182277821
Wildsharky (2026-05-08 06:30:21+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:182365742
FajrAl (2026-05-06 07:38:24+00:00): Sudah ada Jalan Kaliurang di sini, kenapa membuat baru? Perubahan akan dipulihkan
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182277884
FajrAl (2026-05-06 07:39:20+00:00): reverted in changeset/182281764
b-holdet (2026-05-07 14:57:36+00:00): Hvorfor har du valgt at give node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12889442425 
branch=og delikatesse

Det ser ud til at du bare trykker "Ret" uden at se hvad der sker.
kingkingHK (2026-05-16 08:38:47+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182730871
kingkingHK (2026-05-16 08:38:54+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182730871
kingkingHK (2026-05-16 08:38:59+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182730871
mavl (2026-06-07 06:01:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183764451, 183764460, 183764431, 183764453, 183764448, 183764459, 183764455 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20768].
FajrAl (2026-05-06 07:36:22+00:00): perhatikan lagi tag operator=Annisa Mei Rahma
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182278373
FajrAl (2026-05-06 07:35:32+00:00): gunakan cuisine=Indonesian, bukan cuisine=soto
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182278543
FajrAl (2026-05-06 07:34:08+00:00): operator=Annisa Mei Rahma (?)
tag operator itu digunakan untuk siapa yang mengelolanya.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182278564
literan (2026-05-07 19:11:42+00:00): это не название
savsk (2026-05-19 19:18:50+00:00): Jakie jest źródło takiej organizacji ruchu na ul. Szpitalnej? Mapy Google? Nic się tam nie zmieniło do teraz. Do tego w zestawie jedna droga została obcięta
Tomek | Yanosik (2026-05-21 05:56:28+00:00): Edycja na podstawie śladów GPS, może tak było przez jakiś krótki okres czasu. Przywróciłem.
ForestWhisperer (2026-05-24 11:59:52+00:00): opening hours should always be written with the minutes included (08:00-21:00 instead of 08-21) so they can be parsed automatically. I just fixed this for you :)
glibbertorsten (2026-05-06 07:37:25+00:00): Moin! Zufällig bin ich auf dein Hundesportcenter gestoßen und habe einen Vorschlag zum Tagging des Vereinshauses. Weil "club_home" kein öffentlicher Treffpunkt ist, passt hier sehr gut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:club mit den Werten club=dog. Auch wenn es (noch) nicht auf der Karte gerendert wird...
TrickyFoxy (2026-06-23 16:47:27+00:00): К сожалению Гугл.Карты для правок использовать нельзя
TrickyFoxy (2026-06-21 12:39:57+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее
osmviborg (2026-05-06 07:17:37+00:00): Hej pas på med hvor du bruger "parking_aisle", her er det forkert. Se mere her: https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle
MountainGoatDK (2026-05-06 10:44:27+00:00): Er parkeringen ved Pedersvej lige vest for denne ændring, så et korrekt eksempel på hvad der kan tagges som "parking_aisle"?
osmviborg (2026-05-06 10:49:36+00:00): Ja; men kun de tre øst/vest gående veje, altså dem indenfor selve parkeringsarealet.
MountainGoatDK (2026-05-06 11:31:07+00:00): Tak, og kommenter endelig igen i fremtiden, hvis jeg får lavet noget juks, så jeg ikke gør det igen – jeg er i gang med et projekt, hvor jeg går ned ad alle vejene i Køge, så jeg har rig mulighed for at spotte nogle fejl i kortet.
osmviborg (2026-05-06 11:45:25+00:00): Check med wikien, hvis du er det mindste i tvivl 😉
Lostmonkey (2026-05-06 12:09:46+00:00): @MountainGoatDK Forummet er også et godt sted at spørge, hvis du kommer i tvivl om noget. Der er en dansk underkategori: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/dk/77
nlehuby (2026-05-06 07:32:03+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:tactile_paving#Sur_des_chemins
Kovoschiz (2026-05-06 07:14:45+00:00): This section also only connects `=motorway`
Kovoschiz (2026-05-06 07:15:43+00:00): There has been a update on the guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong/Transport/Road#Classifications
Kovoschiz (2026-05-06 07:08:54+00:00): This section is because it only connects `=motorway`
Kovoschiz (2026-05-06 07:09:31+00:00): (ie it would be `=motorway` if there's raised separations, causing a pair of lines to be drawn)
Qxy3jgrgbQp6 (2026-05-06 07:15:54+00:00): Oh, it is not a mistake. I see. It looks confusing.
Bienson (2026-05-07 01:59:25+00:00): Das name-Tag ist für den Namen eines Objektes. Der Name dieses Objektes ist nicht "Geschlossen".
Jetzt ist hier ein (geöffnetes) Restaurant mit dem Namen "Geschlossen" eingetragen.

Ein geschlossenes Objekt wird mit dem Prefix "disused:" getaggt.
Also disused:amenity=restaurant.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:*
Obernetter (2026-05-07 04:22:47+00:00): Hallo Bienson, Danke für den Hinweis, ist geändert
Bienson (2026-05-07 01:54:02+00:00): Wieso wurde die E.ON-Ladesäule mit dem Parkplatz verknüpft?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4361232255

Wieso wurde die Straßenlampe vom Marktplatz an den Lehrerparkplatz verschoben und dort mit Straße und Parkplatz verknüpft?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9497925637

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=182280718#18/51.57156/7.38248
Obernetter (2026-05-07 04:28:41+00:00): Sorry, ist wohl aus versehen beim Verschieben des Bildes passiert, kannst Du das wieder berichtigen?
World_Winner (2026-05-08 05:11:56+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:182365549
Bienson (2026-05-07 02:02:28+00:00): Namen sind keine Beschreibungen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#Namen_sind_keine_Beschreibungen

Ein temporär geschlossenes Restaurant behält alle Tags bei, nur opening_hours=closed wird ergänzt.
Obernetter (2026-05-07 04:22:22+00:00): Hallo Bienson, Danke für den Hinweis, ist geändert
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-02 07:48:41+00:00): Reverted SEO spam removal of top-level tags from POI "White Teak Coffee Roasters" and addition of suspicious name=* tags

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183532688
dmlls (2026-07-07 17:32:18+00:00): Hola Víctor,

Los límites ya están delimitados por el propio landuse=industrial, no hace falta una relación de tipo boundary. Además, en todo caso la vía iría como outer, no como inner (échale un vistazo a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary).

Elimino la relación.

Un saludo,
Diego
Buraddo (2026-05-06 12:25:23+00:00): Hello, why do you simplify the traffic lights tagging scheme?
Both variants are accepted by the OSM standard: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals
I see no benefit in changing something that is already correct
EditTimisoara (2026-05-06 13:57:22+00:00): Hello. The chosen scheme better represents footway crossings with only one set of traffic lights ("highway=crossing, crossing=traffic_signals"), as opposed to two sets of with an island in between (See Piata Leonardo Da Vinci, TImisoara). Routers optimized for footway that add penalties for traffic-lights benefit from this.
Buraddo (2026-05-07 06:54:19+00:00): This seems to be the decision of some specific routers. There is no rule that highway=crossing has a different penalty than highway=traffic_signal. I would argue that a lot of routers will probably treat them both the same as they have the crossing=traffic_signal tag.

Unfortunately, we don't really have a specific tag to mark what you are looking for (separate light phases).
eggie (2026-05-06 08:30:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
TrickyFoxy (2026-06-25 12:44:30+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184582092
Jakka (2026-05-06 18:50:03+00:00): Is dit een officiële straatnaam met bordjes en dan nog privé? Op officiële kaart niet vermeld. Zie
https://www.geopunt.be/shared/5f899327-69db-4557-9464-33841488d6ab
BREKO (2026-05-07 06:51:51+00:00): Ik heb de naam terug verwijderd. Dit staat ter plaatse nergens vermeld en is noch op de website van stad Genk, noch op de website van het Atlas-College terug te vinden.
söm4324 (2026-05-06 10:10:42+00:00): Hi,
welchen Hintergrund hat das service=drive-through an den Wegen? Das ist eigentlich eine Markierung für z.B.  den Durchfahrservice bei McDonalds und ähnlichen. Gibt es hier einen solchen Service?
siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=drive-through?uselang=de

Für Wege, die einfach mal zwischen Häusern  durchführen, ist dieser Tag falsch.
opendcc (2026-05-06 13:02:09+00:00): Habs berichtigt
söm4324 (2026-05-06 13:11:00+00:00): Danke :)
qstep (2026-05-06 08:20:48+00:00): OSM is not for points of temporary events. Please delete this.
Mevess (2026-05-06 19:54:34+00:00): Bonjour !
le tag building=allotment_house qualifie des petites maisonnettes servant à stocker du matériel ou autre sur les parcelles de jardins ouvrier/familiaux. Par extension on peut l'utiliser pour les même type de maisonnettes sur les parcelles privées.
j'ai fait l'erreur pendant des années du fait d'une traduction sur JOSM qui portait à confusion: "maison de lotissement"
Pour les maisons individuelles non mitoyennes, il faut plutôt utiliser les valeurs house, detached.
Merci et bonne carto !
Mevess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182283457
Valario127 (2026-05-06 09:51:58+00:00): ¡Hola! Se supone que ahí hay una turbo rotonda, por lo que los carriles deberían estar separados para una mejor adaptación automática de las salidas dentro de la rotonda. ¿Podría indicarme por qué ha revertido exactamente mi edición? ¿Estaba mal mapeado? Gracias.
Maksim Sazanovich (2026-05-06 15:16:55+00:00): Hello, Valario127! Thank you for your feedback. I reviewed this case again and agreed with you. I was confused because, according to OSM Wiki, the mapping of turbo-roundabouts is relevant when the lanes are physically separated by kerbs, but here is the solid road markings line which works as well as a kerb. So I decided to revert my edit. Please, also add the tag 'roundabout=turbo' to all the features of this roundabout (also according to OSM Wiki).
Best regards, Maksim.
szjozsef (2026-06-16 05:06:45+00:00): Wrong Edit, please be more carefull next time !
TheSwavu (2026-05-06 11:20:03+00:00): Hi,

If a business moves then it's address usually also moves ;-)

I have fixed this one.

Cheers.
TheSwavu (2026-05-06 11:20:26+00:00): its not it's
meongseolin (2026-05-06 08:38:36+00:00): 该变更集系对孝感的初步改进
bxl-forever (2026-05-06 10:31:58+00:00): Bedankt hiervoor.
Heb je plannen om de adressen ook bij te werken? Ze hebben nog steeds de oude naam, die niet overeenkomt met de straat.
Ik kan het doen als je wilt, maar ik wilde het eerst aan jou vragen.
bxl-forever (2026-05-18 14:11:58+00:00): Gedaan.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/571793782/history
eggie (2026-05-06 08:56:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-05-06 09:01:58+00:00): Staat dat paaltje in de bocht van de Weteringsdijk er nog steeds.
Ik heb motor_vehicle=no verwijderd van het paaltje. Dat houdt per default motorvoertuigen tegen muv moped en mofa.
MVG
eggie
mathijs24 (2026-05-06 09:07:43+00:00): Het paaltje is enige tijd weg geweest, maar is enkele weken geleden weer teruggeplaatst. Hier kunnen dus geen auto's passeren.
eggie (2026-05-06 09:11:22+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk.
..motor_vehicle=no heb ik ook van het wegdeel gehaald. Anders geen routering voor moped.
Het zal niet routeren voor autoverkeer.
Mapse,
eggie
Negreheb (2026-07-26 18:35:13+00:00): Servus, kurze Frage, aber die Gabelsbergerstraße und die Sterneckstraße sind ja beleuchtet. Ich hätte damit die Gehsteige schon als beleuchtet eingetragen.
Ich weis, da gibts auch im Forum schon eine Diskussion, ab wann man sagen kann, dass der Weg schon noch beleuchtet ist, auch wenn der Weg selbst keine eigene explizite Beleuchtung hat, aber bei den Straßen würde ich schon sagen, dass das reicht, oder? 

Wenns dir lieber ist, kann ich auch im Forum einen Thread aufmachen, dass da etwas breiter darüber geredet wird, wie wir das zumindest in Österreich handhaben könnten :)
eggie (2026-05-06 09:36:13+00:00): Hoi,
Je info samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
 	Organic Maps is geen ideale editor en maakt incomplete nieuwe adresnodes.
MVG
eggie
kobuskobus (2026-05-06 11:50:33+00:00): Hoi Eggie, dankje dat is goed om te weten. Heb jij wellicht een suggestie voor een android app die dit wel goed kan? Vriendelijke groet
eggie (2026-05-06 11:54:57+00:00): Comaps heeft hetzelfde probleem.
Soms gaat het wel goed. Denk dat selecteren het probleem is.
Je zou OsmAnd eens kunnen proberen. Dat kan ook met je mobiel. En anders de normale editor.
ID de webeditor bestaat ook als app 
Ik heb er geen ervaring mee.
Mapse,
eggie