piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-20 17:02:52+00:00): seems fine, though also shop=wallpaper_studio would be better than amenity=fixme
TheLNL (2025-04-22 06:55:58+00:00): It is a pain to tag like that in Everydoor. But as of recently I have started changing the tags manually. I have no I idea why it is like this, to me shop=yes seems more informative than an amenity=fixme. There are also tools for others on Street Complete or SCEE to expand on shop=yes

Anyways rant aside, I will now change the tag to interior decoration
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-22 13:49:23+00:00): I guess you can comment in https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/880 if you have an opinion about this

thanks for a fix!
julcnx (2025-03-27 15:33:52+00:00): ฉันสังเกตว่าการแก้ไขล่าสุดของคุณได้ลบถนนสำคัญหลายจุด รวมถึงสะพานบนทางหลวงหลัก ดังนั้นฉันจึงย้อนการแก้ไขกลับเพื่อป้องกันปัญหา หากเป็นข้อผิดพลาด ฉันยินดีช่วยแนะนำวิธีแก้ไขที่ถูกต้อง แจ้งให้ฉันทราบหากคุณมีคำถามใด ๆ!

I noticed your recent edit removed key road segments, including a major highway bridge, so I’ve reverted it to prevent issues. If this was unintentional, I’d be happy to help guide you on editing correctly. Let me know if you have any questions!
NeisBot (2025-03-27 09:45:44+00:00): Hello and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because it appears to follow a pattern that could be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related.

Could you kindly confirm if your map edits were intentional?
#MapWithoutSpam #URLs
Taya_S (2025-03-27 10:02:33+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164156044
kapazao (2025-03-27 16:26:55+00:00): Hola, ¿podrías dar referencias de estos datos?
Por otra parte deberías revisar en la wiki sobre el etiquetado de los elementos.
El nombre debe ser el del elemento y no debe estar en mayúscula, contener comillas o cosas que no pertenecen al nombre, como la potencia generada. El separador decimal es el '.', no ','.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164155257
DD1GJ (2025-03-27 11:01:05+00:00): Hallo VOrOrt,
der Wunsch und seineUmsetzung sind etwas seltsam. Die Webseite ist aubrufbar und Name, Sportart sowie Mail sind weiterhin vorhanden. Plausibilitätsprogramme melden nun Unstimmigkeiten, weil zu sport=10pin das zugehörige leiusre (bowling_alley oder sports_centre) fehlt.

Wie lautete der genaue Wunsch und warum wurde er geäußert?
A67-A67 (2026-01-23 11:48:16+00:00): In deze wijziging worden omschrijvingen toegevoegd in de name-tag. De name-tag is alleen bedoeld voor namen. Daarom heb ik deze beschrijvingen verwijderd.
SekeRob (2025-05-25 09:04:48+00:00): 
Ciao Aluminum0173


Gli indirizzi dal 425 al 479 stampano Via Salle sotto i numeri civici (il Fiume Sallinello nelle vicinanze). Per questo motivo non sono sicuro del nome Via Galileo Galilei. sulla SS16 in questo settore. Sicuramente con la sequenza alta dei numeri civici gli indirizzi si riferiscono senz’altro alla strada principale. Dovrebbe forse essere aggiunto Via Salle come old_name=Via Salle?
Puoi controllare quando sei nei paraggi o confermare che è stato verificato?
Grazie mille in anticipo.

SekeRob
Aluminum0173 (2025-05-26 06:07:04+00:00): Ciao!

Penso sia effettivamente old name, anche anncsu conferma Galileo Galilei, e come detto anche da te i civici alti si collegano a tutta la via.

Ammetto che per un po' non penso di tornare a Giulianova, meglio se creo una nota?
eggie (2025-03-27 10:19:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Wat is je bron in deze? 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Hollands Kroon (2025-03-27 10:32:13+00:00): Hallo Eggie,
Dank voor je bericht.
Mijn bron ben ikzelf als strategisch beleidsadviseur mobiliteit Hollands Kroon, en de provincie Noord Holland zowel ambtelijk als bestuurlijk.
eggie (2025-03-27 10:39:25+00:00): Ah.. mooi..dat is dicht bi het vuur. 
In 2007 is ooit een donatie gedaan door kaartenmaker AND en daarna zijn die wegen opnieuw geclassificeerd. Toen zal iets wel eens verkeerd zijn gegaan. 
Het viel me op omdat ervaren infomappers hier ook aan gewerkt hebben.
Zie

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/6099117#map=11/52.8606/4.8946&layers=N

MVG
eggie
JeroenvanderGun (2025-03-27 11:40:06+00:00): Beste Hollands Kroon,

Het klopt dat dit geen onderdeel van de provinciale N240 is, maar het is wel bewegwijzerd als N240:

Kruispunt Koningsweg-Poelweg: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=518508729150446&focus=photo
Rotonde Koningsweg-Rijksstraatweg: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=386212059160258&focus=photo

Ik heb het wegnummer daarom teruggezet.

Het onderscheid tussen provinciaal en niet-provinciaal is echter wel op een andere manier te maken: als je in de iD-bewerker kijkt onder Tags, kun je daar zien dat als "operator" is ingevuld "Gemeente Hollands Kroon". Als het een provinciale weg zou zijn, zou daar "Provincie Noord-Holland" staan.

https://i.imgur.com/w34kjYh.png

Met vriendelijke groet,

Jeroen van der Gun
eggie (2025-03-27 10:25:05+00:00): Dag Hollands Kroon,

Heb je contact gezocht met de voorgaande inframapper Jeroen van der Gun voordat je iets aanpaste?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145114762#map=12/52.8447/4.9106&layers=N

MVG
eggie
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-29 01:38:37+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17464
eggie (2025-03-27 10:47:59+00:00): Dag Fingerhat. 
Welkom bij OSM.. 
Ben bang dat dit niet goed is gegaan.
Hier lopen verschillende routerelaties en die kun je niet zomaar onderbreken.
Ook hoort roundabout niet op de nodes bij de aansluitingen getagd te worden.

Ik kijk even of ik het simpel kan herstellen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-27 11:03:47+00:00): In ieder geval de routerelaties hier hersteld.
De tag van de rotonde staat in het midden.
Niet alle routes kloppen. Die zijn ergens anders ook onderbroken.
Zonder ervaring beter niet beginnen met routerelaties wijzigen en zeker niet met editor iD.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-27 11:16:16+00:00): In de Grensstraat heb je een heel wegdeel verwijderd. Waarom? Ook hier zijn de routerelaties onderbroken?
eggie (2025-03-27 11:20:17+00:00): Routerelaties hersteld alleen de Grensparkroute zit elders al vol met gaten.
Helaas kreeg ik geen antwoord waarom je een wegdeel had verwijderd hier.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=164156902

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-27 11:36:43+00:00): Gansrijdersroute hersteld
eggie (2025-03-27 11:52:05+00:00): Grensparkroute hersteld.
Vraag svp eerst om hulp voordat je gaat knippen of wegen gaat verwijderen waar routerelaties overlopen.

MVG
eggie
trial (2025-03-27 20:59:19+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci de remettre foot=yes et bicycle=yes.
Il s'agit de bateaubus qui accueillent les piétons et les cyclistes.
Les vélos ne coulent pas à bord des bateaux !
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
NeisBot (2025-03-27 10:27:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
Kuka by Arterio (2025-03-27 10:35:13+00:00): Yes
eggie (2025-03-27 10:42:14+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.
Kleine aanpassing gedaan... name=... is voldoende.

MVG
eggie
Cafetaria Cecile's (2025-03-27 13:04:59+00:00): Oke, bedankt. Maar ik zie nog steeds 010 staan. Die zit er al 10 jaar niet meer. Hoe kan dit gewijzigd worden?
eggie (2025-03-27 13:08:50+00:00): Dat is de cache van je browserscherm dat je dwars zit. Paar keer CTRL-F5 .. Je cache leegmaken.

MVG
eggie
blincoln (2025-03-27 10:39:09+00:00): Oops, wrong duration read from the source, reverting this change.
silversurfer83 (2025-03-27 16:39:52+00:00): Hi :)

du kannst den Eingang mit einem Punkt auf dem Umriss und der Eigenschaft "entrance=yes" erfassen.

Der Weg, den du hier eingetragen hast (highway=footway, "Fußweg") benötigt keine detaillierteren Zugangsberechtigungen als "access=customers". Über einen Fußweg dieser Form werden idR auch nur Fußgänger geroutet.

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164157452
NeisBot (2025-03-27 10:48:41+00:00): Hello and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because it appears to follow a pattern that could be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related.

Could you kindly confirm if your map edits were intentional?
#MapWithoutSpam #URLs
Taya_S (2025-03-27 10:58:20+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164158240
NeisBot (2025-03-27 10:51:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-04-02 15:51:18+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164427916
NeisReview (2025-04-02 15:53:39+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164428024
NeisReview (2025-04-02 15:54:01+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164428036
JasonBob (2025-03-27 16:05:12+00:00): I noticed you switched the under construction roadway. Last I drove this road, it was reversed (the northern alignment was u/c and the southern was the one being used for Terminal access). Has this changed very recently? Recent photos posted by the airport show it how it was
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2025-03-28 22:18:03+00:00): Hi, JasonBob! 
My name is Yuliya, and I am the Quality Control Lead on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you very much for your insight. I have switched the under construction roadways based on Lyft-owned street view imagery.
Here are the images of the northern alignment (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1314670209) from 13.03.2025 located at 32.7305, -117.19261.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UL2TV4rSJmNePvIzVLyNcWBy_MIWPlLz/view?usp=drive_link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YlsUlD_YXoMAbHW5dCkEdWnnoiFs8Jfk/view?usp=drive_link
Additionally, telemetry data from the last week supports the information shown in the photos: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tzDXzI1i1Eg0zVI6DrDwYQbU1Ct_6Eu_/view?usp=drive_link.

I hope this clarifies our revision. Please let me know if you have any further questions or if there is any new information available.

Best regards, Yuliya
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:02:41+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535733
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:02:37+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535731
NeisBot (2025-03-27 10:54:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-04-02 15:49:41+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164427839
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:02:34+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535730
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:02:16+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535726
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:02:03+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535725
Rogoyski (2025-03-28 17:38:45+00:00): Uprzejmie proszę o przywrócenie skasowanych stojaków rowerowych w obrębie stacji Veturilo. Społeczność uprzednio zdecydowała, że stojaki winny pozostać oznaczone osobnym obiektem w stosunku do stacji/wypożyczalni.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/veturilo-warszawa-tagowanie-stacji-roweru-publicznego/9503/26
Rogoyski (2025-04-07 21:56:03+00:00): Czy mogę prosić o ustosunkowanie się do tej sytuacji?
user_717069 (2025-04-23 09:05:23+00:00): Te stojaki są dedykowane stacji i choć wyglądają tak samo jak inne, to od edytorów można chyba wymagać trochę pogłębionej wiedzy w temacie. To że mogą także pełnić rolę parkingu dla prywatnych rowerów to już taka ich właściwość (do poprzednich też dało się przypiąć, jedynie trudniej było to zrobić "przez pomyłkę"), natomiast raczej nie należy tego samego obiektu fizycznego oznaczać dwoma osobnymi obiektami na mapie.
Rogoyski (2025-04-23 18:36:31+00:00): Gdy stare stacje były zastępowane obecnymi stojakami, na forum OSM dyskutowane było, jak rozwiązać tę sytuację. I decyzją społeczności było, aby osobno oznaczać stację, a osobno stojaki. Uznaliśmy, że nie jest to ten sam obiekt tak samo jak przystanek autobusowy i wiata przystankowa albo plac zabaw i huśtawka, które są zaznaczane jako odrębne obiekty. Jeśli chcesz polemizować z tymi ustaleniami, prosimy o udział w forum:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/veturilo-warszawa-tagowanie-stacji-roweru-publicznego/9503/40
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:01:59+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535723
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:01:53+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535720
maurocam (2025-04-04 12:09:38+00:00): Ciao, vorrei capire i cambiamenti fatti in OSM, perche' : 1) come si vede sono sentieri il cui rilievo oramai e' vecchissimo 2) in vista di futuro rilievo nuovo, ci sono elementi da catturare meglio ? 
Grazie
Andrea Del Sarto (2025-04-04 18:15:31+00:00): ciao, ho solo corretto un refuso nel tag distance.
di sicuro un nuovo rilievo per aggiornare le geometrie può essere utile
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-10 16:56:01+00:00): Hello!

You used
access=private;
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10155926018/history

Have you maybe meant
access=private
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
dcskobuffs (2025-04-02 17:03:35+00:00): Hello Jadher A,

Thank you for mapping these areas with thorough detail. I noticed the use of the tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway=access_aisle was used on features such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1371995610, which is important detail for pedestrian use. However, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway is “used for mapping minor pathways which are used mainly or exclusively by pedestrians.” The parking lot vehicle circulators that were previously highway=service (such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1371995603) are used mainly for vehicles and not for directing pedestrians around the lot. The policy explanation on these pages:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle detail that they are the appropriate tag for the vehicle circulator roads here, based on use and common convention. If you agree, and can go ahead and make those slight updates here.

Thanks and Happy mapping!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-10 18:00:34+00:00): Hello!

You used
access=private;
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12704499609/history

Have you maybe meant
access=private
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
FLBezoar (2025-04-11 11:45:02+00:00): Thank you.  I'm new at editing and learning new skills.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:01:50+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535719
Maksim Hradaboyeu (2025-03-27 11:15:46+00:00): Fixed road geometry
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:01:47+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535718
Jose Luis Infante (2025-03-28 12:21:28+00:00): Hola!

Muchas gracias por añadir información de accesibilidad.

Solamente comentarte que corrijas la etiqueta de los lavabos, ya que alguna que has indicado no es correcta.

Por último os sugiero un par de Apps para móvil: Wheelmap y StreetComplete. Con ellas podéis añadir información directamente a pie de calle.

También tenéis MapComplete, que lo podéis usar con el móvil. Mirad https://mapcomplete.org/onwheels.html?z=17.8&lat=42.78011745249242&lon=-7.410318910846172

Un saludo!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164159365
NeisBot (2025-03-27 11:30:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
thinze (2025-03-27 11:36:29+00:00): OK.
If you dont like (allow) promotional text, then you can use these "description":

"Versicherungsagentur in Köln"

Best Regards
NeisReview (2025-04-06 17:48:19+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164209361
Jose Luis Infante (2025-03-28 12:21:38+00:00): Hola!

Muchas gracias por añadir información de accesibilidad.

Solamente comentarte que corrijas la etiqueta de los lavabos, ya que alguna que has indicado no es correcta.

Por último os sugiero un par de Apps para móvil: Wheelmap y StreetComplete. Con ellas podéis añadir información directamente a pie de calle.

También tenéis MapComplete, que lo podéis usar con el móvil. Mirad https://mapcomplete.org/onwheels.html?z=17.8&lat=42.78011745249242&lon=-7.410318910846172

Un saludo!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164159377
edvac (2025-03-28 15:24:04+00:00): Gracias, José Luis Infante!
Al tratarse de una actividad escolar organizada (esto fue una prueba piloto antes de empezar ya más en serio), preferimos usar FieldPapers para tomar datos sobre el terreno, e iD para editar. De vez en cuando nos encontramos con locales nuevos u otros objetos que no están en OSM, y para eso no son útiles esas aplicaciones. Aunque fáciles de usar, es mejor que aprendan la base del mapeo, y más adelante quizás pueden aprender a usar otras aplicaciones.
Jose Luis Infante (2025-03-28 16:23:30+00:00): Genial!!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:01:44+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535714
aTarom (2025-03-27 16:30:47+00:00): Hola, en estas ways
https://www.osm.org/way/1372026469/history
https://www.osm.org/way/1372026470/history
https://www.osm.org/way/1372026471/history
el tag source
es un error? no tenemos permiso para usar esa fuente, el nombre del torrente no coincide con el del IGN, puedes revisarlo?
Saludos
jpsa2023 (2025-03-27 17:02:39+00:00): Hola, gracias por tu observación. Efectivamente es un error de edición. La fuente es la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua, de la que sí tenemos autorización expresa y es la recomendada para la topinímia de la C. Valenciana. Ya lo he corregido. Saludos
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:26:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
Taya_S (2025-03-27 11:33:42+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164159736
histrio (2025-03-27 13:46:48+00:00): Hello! `parts=yes` is also not a correct tag. Please use building:part=yes
Thank you!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:01:32+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535710
eggie (2025-03-27 12:11:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
YuliyaSurta (2025-03-27 11:49:19+00:00): Also added missing road.
Marek-M (2025-03-27 12:51:06+00:00): Cześć, opis 'OSP należy do KSRG' jest zbędny, gdyż już jest tam tag `ksrg=yes`
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dfire_station#Tagowanie
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:01:23+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535706
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:01:11+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535702
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:01:08+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535699
archie (2025-03-27 12:31:45+00:00): no, ":" is the correct way to express genitiv in the swedish language. Please revert your cs. Thanks!
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-09-25 14:30:57+00:00): Merhaba "Mehmet Bey"(eski kullanıcı adınızla "Sinem Yazgı", yeni kullanıcı adınızla "Mehmet Bey", kayıtlı kalması için user id:22152243). 

Yüksek ihtimalle size ait olan diğer bir hesaba (username:Pelin Sungur, user id:22006507) da aynı soruyu sormuştum.Bkz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158627787
Pelin Sungur(user id:22006507) adı hesabın engellenmesinin hemen ardından bu hesaptan lojmanları eklemeye devam ettiniz.

Türkiye'deki kaymakamlık lojmanlarını ve valilik lojmanlarını ekliyorsunuz. Lojmanların konum bilgilerini nereden alıyorsunuz? Bu verinin kaynağı nedir?
Lütfen cevap verir misiniz?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:01:01+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535698
Pieter Vander Vennet (2025-04-02 21:04:00+00:00): Teruggedraaid in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164439766

Dit zijn geen "woonerven" met bijhorend verkeersbord, maar nog steeds "residential", dus "woonstraat" met zone 30
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:00:53+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164535695
DaveF (2025-03-28 16:24:48+00:00): They're placed where they were to prevent them form overwriting other details.
Graham Asher (2025-03-28 19:25:48+00:00): That's not recommended, and is an example of mapping for the renderer (i.e., second-guessing the renderer's policy). According to the wiki, settlements points should be at the centre of the settlement. The rendering software can then decide where to place the label. A label point to the east of a settlement would in any case cause a label at that position to overlap the settlement if the map was rotated; a common use case.
DaveF (2025-03-28 20:53:27+00:00): All edits are for the renderer, otherwise the map would be just a mass of black dots.

The expression you require is 'map incorrectly for the renderer'. Their locations didn't affect that.

Avoiding plonking things on top of each other allows the render to be clear to all users.
Graham Asher (2025-03-29 07:47:17+00:00): Dave, I respect your point of view, but that's not how OpenStreetMap works or is intended to be used. And in fact there are areas (like central London) where many POIs and other things are almost literally on top of each other, because they are mapped in their actual positions. The renderer handles that by prioritising some labels above others, and by moving labels around. But we as volunteer cartographers map ground truth. Of course it is debatable where the 'true' centre of a village is, but the centre of the built-up area, or a road junction near that point, is always a better place than somewhere in a field outside the village. It's also important to map village centres properly because they can be used as destinations by routing systems. For further backup, please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice, in particular the section 'Don't map for the renderer'.
DaveF (2025-03-30 02:12:23+00:00): You're clearly an expert.
Which rendering do you administer?
Which other renderings "handles that  by moving labels around. "