piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
acutestrokeorg (2024-10-26 10:57:09+00:00): https://acutestroke.org/
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1jTgZuZU5SRnH8wo3Oabvi9G4WhyQMsmu
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14QSlGG5aKafjppCyDzBhD3zpLh_58QinzVzDF3XHj_o/edit?usp=drivesdk
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1CptU5hwA0e8XF1NcDA6xpYpMDOXAKtjP
https://sites.google.com/view/acutestrokeorg/home
https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1Lwodll9SvgQnTIqaawwJQTx8CNapYCM
https://acutestrokeorg.blogspot.com/2024/10/mibet.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_rV5CgGZ1w
https://x.com/acutestrokeorg/status/1850123110261063807
https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/nh-ci-mibet5/episodes/Mibet---Nh-Ci-Uy-Tn-Vi-T-L-Cc-Bng--Hp-Dn-e2q5po2
https://www.scoop.it/topic/mibet-by-nha-cai-mibet-8/p/4161987202/2024/10/26/tim-hieu-nha-cai-mibet-ca-cuoc-truc-tuyen-an-toan
ftcat (2024-11-11 07:30:35+00:00): Just a note, These are forestry plantations. Trees are very young
Adrian Shobrooke (2024-11-11 10:45:31+00:00): Polygons modified. I didn't map the original polygons, but just tidied up a little. Odd to plant a managed forest in the middle of what looks like a natural wood. Unless it fills in something else?
eggie (2024-10-26 20:08:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Alle begin is moeilijk. Op een highway=footway mag je niet fietsen behalve als er een bordje staat fietsen toegestaan.
Een sidewalk is een trottoir langs een andere weg.. Als er geen andere weg is kun je de tag foorway=sidewalk weglaten.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
totera (2024-10-28 22:03:24+00:00): Ciao Simone_ilpollo, hai fatto bene a segnalare la chiusura, ma perché eliminare il ponte? L'ho ripristinato
MaciekMma (2024-10-27 16:30:44+00:00): Czesc, usunales 2 budynki. Jeden slusznie (polnoc), drugi nieslusznie (zachod). Byla to rozdzielnia SN wlasnosci PGE, ktora dodal @tomzyl. Ona tam nadal stoi, ladna, nowa rozdzielnia sporych rozmiarow https://osmcha.org/changesets/158372846
MaciekMma (2024-10-27 16:34:15+00:00): BTW. zadziwila mnie ilosc detali Twojego mapowania, bardzo skrupulatna robota :)
anti-romantic (2024-10-27 12:27:56+00:00): Может быть, его стоит писать не в скобки, а в alt_name, или loc_name, или old_name? В name должно быть одно название, а для нескольких названий есть специальные теги

Подробнее: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
Đuro Jiří (2025-03-18 08:17:16+00:00): Ciao Gian_89, posso sapere perché stai sempre cambiando area verde, cioè erba al interno del parco in parco pubblico? Parco pubblico è solo uno, che è già mappato https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1326438163#map=17/43.437433/13.658994&layers=N
Saluti
emersonveenstra (2024-10-26 14:15:27+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158378273, please do not add personal information to the map, thanks
Dodko (2024-10-26 13:41:34+00:00): Na FB použite značku contact:facebook
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:facebook
felipeeugenio (2024-10-26 12:40:44+00:00): Id	Contributor	Tmstmp UTC	Action	Comment
4494238	felipeeugenio	2024-10-26 14:37	closed	ok
4494239	felipeeugenio	2024-10-26 14:37	closed	ok
4494233	felipeeugenio	2024-10-26 14:37	closed	ok
4494241	felipeeugenio	2024-10-26 14:37	closed	ok
4494235	felipeeugenio	2024-10-26 14:37	closed	ok
4494236	felipeeugenio	2024-10-26 14:37	closed	ok
4494232	felipeeugenio	2024-10-26 14:35	closed	ok
lucka-me (2024-10-26 12:42:48+00:00): Typo, *Add subarea relation.*
bxl-forever (2024-10-26 15:49:36+00:00): Hello,

Some parts of your change are intriguing.

1) We restored the bilingual name.  This is because Brussels is a multilingual city with two official languages. Removing the Dutch part of the name to make it appear as if Brussels was only a French-language city is not acceptable.

2) You changed the target key as if this was the embassy of Ireland to the EU.  Yet, their website seems to be clear that this is the embassy to Belgium (https://www.ireland.ie/en/belgium/brussels/about/ambassador/).  Could you please elaborate about this.

You may be intrested to know that the representation office of Ireland to the EU is in the same building, that might explain the confusion for people who are not familiar with our city: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7395949845

Thanks in advance.
hocu (2024-10-26 17:47:16+00:00): Hi, thanks for your comment.

1) I am sorry about that, and thank you for fixing it. I usually try to respect the language requirements of the countries, but sometimes I can miss things. Thanks to the collaborative nature of OSM, local users with better knowledge can improve on or fix others' contributions.

2) This must be due to an issue with the JOSM, where it sometimes keeps the values from previous edits in the same session. Very annoying, and I try to keep an eye on it, however it aometimes happens. I would jave foxed it if I'd noticed.

Regards.
mavl (2024-10-26 15:11:09+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет 9-й куст как автобусную станцию. Это неправильно. Пожалуйста, попробуйте обозначить иначе.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9E%D0%B1%D1%8A%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D1%8B_%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%82%D1%8B
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-06 14:21:34+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9786562615/history has shop = metaphysical that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=metaphysical ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=esoteric or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=new_age ? If yes, what is the difference?

Should we document this shop value as distinct, valid and useful?  Or maybe it is so obvious duplicate that I should have replaced it with an automatic edit rather than making a note?
Hypsometric (2024-11-10 02:01:47+00:00): Thanks for the note. I did some searching and ended up taking the suggestion on the note. My search didn't turn up shop=new_age but I have just updated the map with it.
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-27 06:34:43+00:00): reviewed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158375207
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-27 06:34:09+00:00): reviewed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158375244
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-27 06:33:09+00:00): reviewed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158375264
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-27 06:32:06+00:00): reviewed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158375270
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-27 06:30:37+00:00): reviewd
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158375285
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-27 06:30:17+00:00): good edit
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158375312
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-27 06:35:28+00:00): reviewed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158375324
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-27 06:35:36+00:00): reviewed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158375340
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-27 06:35:45+00:00): reviewed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158375358
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-26 13:10:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2358278850
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2358278882
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1328380138
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1328380139

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
yrtimiD (2024-11-01 22:36:11+00:00): tag "street" doesn't exists. please use addr:street instead.
robinpdm (2024-11-06 09:51:41+00:00): adresse.data.gouv.fr uses "Rue de Jéricho" and "Impasse de Jéricho": https://adresse.data.gouv.fr/base-adresse-nationale/54339_0220#16.65/48.705651/6.186614

Should we still keep "du"?
robinpdm (2024-11-06 10:03:23+00:00): Looks like the street name sign uses "du" indeed. Interesting case!
Rom1 (2024-11-06 14:16:51+00:00): La commune fait bien mention de "Rue du Jéricho" sur son site internet https://www.villedemalzeville.fr/vie-scolaire/enseignement-1er-degre/ et https://www.villedemalzeville.fr/evenement/cine-pop-la-derniere-seance/
robinpdm (2024-11-06 15:00:09+00:00): Parfait ! Merci pour la correction et clarification
Supaplex (2024-10-26 13:40:25+00:00): Hi, 

Graffiting is not allowed on OpenStreetMap

Không được phép vẽ bậy trên OpenStreetMap

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158376857
nccuong (2024-10-26 13:47:59+00:00): đừng lấy tên dự án ra làm trò đùa, đừng làm xấu mặt người Việt Nam
silversurfer83 (2024-10-27 08:23:56+00:00): Guten Morgen :)

der nervige Korbacher wieder ;)

mein nächster Tip für deine Arbeit: Der Standort eines Hydranten kann gerade in NRW sehr gut mit dem Luftbild erfasst werden. Selbst wenn er in der Straße liegt, legen wir den Punkt (node), der den Hydranten darstellt, möglichst genau an seinen Standort ohne ihn mit der Straße zu verkleben.

Grüße ins Sauerland
silversurfer83
coteyka (2024-10-26 13:27:42+00:00): неправильно подписал пакет правок, фикс 87 маршрута
Supaplex (2024-10-26 13:53:26+00:00): Hi

The OpenStreetMap project is a place to record truth and only truth, so we follow the on-the-ground rules. On the OpenStreetMap wiki, we have maintained  a list of disputed territories: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories

The things that do not exist in reality will be removed. 

Dự án OpenStreetMap là nơi ghi lại sự thật và chỉ sự thật, vì vậy chúng tôi tuân theo các quy tắc thực tế. Trên wiki OpenStreetMap, chúng tôi đã duy trì danh sách các vùng lãnh thổ tranh chấp: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories

Những thứ không tồn tại trong thực tế sẽ bị xóa.

Data Working Group
data@osmfoundation.org

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158377441
TrickyFoxy (2024-10-27 00:10:22+00:00): Ссылка не рабочая. И точка должна быть не здесь
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 03:04:38+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165051935
gurglypipe (2024-10-26 18:52:12+00:00): Could you please stop removing geometric detail from the map? If you think these shouldn’t be crossings, then maybe change them to footway=link, but don’t delete correct geometric detail which others have added to the map.
Pete Owens (2024-10-28 01:54:09+00:00): If it is not a crossing then it was the original tagging it as a crossing was incorrect.

These are simply junctions.
RedGreenBlue09 (2024-10-26 15:41:18+00:00): Please don't create more relations for provincial roads. They are not used by anybody and requires effort to maintain.
RedGreenBlue09 (2024-10-26 15:59:25+00:00): Please used "proposed" for not constructed roads.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed
RedGreenBlue09 (2024-10-26 15:59:27+00:00): Please used "proposed" for not constructed roads.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed
RedGreenBlue09 (2024-10-26 15:59:30+00:00): Please used "proposed" for not constructed roads.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed
RedGreenBlue09 (2024-10-26 15:59:32+00:00): Please used "proposed" for not constructed roads.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed
ManuelB701 (2024-10-27 13:02:48+00:00): Hallo SimonSaysCode418,

natürlich weiß ich, dass deine Änderungen nicht böswillig sind aber
der Grund, warum ich die Änderungen letztens zurücksetzte, ist folgend:
- Es ist ist inkonsistent mit den anderen Wegen d.h. warum nur dieser Teil des Kreisels aber nicht z.B. der südlicher Teil Rampenstraße. Wichtig ist hierbei, dass an der Stelle Stützmauer eingezeichnet sind, die das Ende der Brücke kennzeichnen und Brücken über Stützmauern kannen einen schon stutzig machen.
- Selbst wenn du die Brückenteile behalten möchtest, ist es immer gut, dass die Brückenfläche zusätzlich erweiterst anstelle d.h. warum diese Wege außerhalb der man_made=bridge stehen, sieht schlecht aus und ist von den Daten her inkonsistent. Außerdem fangen Wege auf Brücken nicht direkt an Abzweigen an sondern erst dahinter.
- Zu guter Letzt ist das Teilen von Straßen ist nur sinnvoll, wenn diese unterschiedliche Merkmale haben oder durch das Relationen (z.B. Routen, Abbiegebeschränkungen) entstehen. So wie du es gemacht ist, sieht so aus, als ob es ohne Grund aufgeteilt worden ist, da die Merkmale die gleichen sind. Das ist auch einer der Gründe, warum Lücken in den Relationen entstanden sind: Nichts aufzuspalten bedeutet auch, dass keine Gefahr entsteht, dass der Weg in den Relationen nicht aufgenommen wird.

Die Pointe ist, dass es für mich um die Qualitätskontrolle geht und deine Änderungen haben am Ende verbesserungswürdige (insbesondere, dass es sich bei denen Fehlern auch teilweise um Anfängerfehlern sich handeln wie z.B. der Anfang einer Brücke).
Außerdem erspart es mir Arbeit, eine Diskussion zu führen und diese Daten zu verbessern, insbesondere, falls ich eine vor-Ort-Überprüfung bräuchte.

Grüße
Manuel
silversurfer83 (2024-10-27 08:43:34+00:00): Hallo :)

Danke, dass du unterwegs mit OsmAnd die Datenbank für alle verbesserst.

Einen Hinweis hätte ich für dich, nachdem ich mir ein paar deiner älteren Beiträge angesehen habe:

OsmAnd bietet beim Anlegen neuer POI praktisch immer das Feld "Name" an. Bitte trage dort nur dann etwas ein, wenn es wirklich ein Namen gibt. Die allgemein üblichen Sitzbänke haben meistens keinen Eigennamen und dass es eine Bank ist, wird schon über "Art des POI" angegeben und darüber ist sie dann auch später in der Karte auffindbar.

Um dies mit dem Beispiel Sitzbank auszuführen: Es kann sein, dass ein Wanderverein für ihren Ehrenvorsitzenden eine Bank aufstellen und dann eine schöne Kupferplakette drandübeln auf der steht "KARL KARLSEN GEDÄCHTNISBANK". Dann kann dies entweder als Name oder inscription erfasst werden.

Üblich sind Namen bei Restaurants.

Details liefert unser Wiki unter
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen

Bei Fragen immer raus damit und weiter gute Reisen mit OsmAnd
silversurfer83
walkabout (2024-11-22 19:14:01+00:00): Hi, danke für die Info.
OsmAnd macht es leider nicht wirklich einfach alles richtig zu machen. Zumindest nicht wenn man nur gelegentlich was ergänzen will ohne erst das Handbuch zu lesen....
Betrifft leider nicht nur OSM-Einträge.
Ich bemühe mich besser zu werden 😉
AgusQui (2024-10-27 02:14:49+00:00): Hola HABmaps, te recomiendo que para mapear edificios uses las imágenes de "CABA ortofotos 2021" o 2017, son muchas más claras y mejor alineadas que las demás.
HABmaps (2025-09-09 11:24:58+00:00): Hola AgusQui, vi las imágenes sugeridas disponibles y son mas claras, empecé a usarlas sobre CABA
NeisBot (2024-10-29 05:11:48+00:00): Hello EbnSamir1, and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and changesets, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-29 05:21:14+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158482136
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 02:58:32+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165051871
eggie (2024-10-26 20:45:58+00:00): Dg PB

Anders even je vraag op het forum stellen.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/434

MVG
eggie
kapazao (2024-10-27 19:37:33+00:00): Hola, ¿qué ha ocurrido aquí con la Villa Romana de Salar (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/562436028)?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158378391
Jrachi (2024-10-27 07:57:43+00:00): Ciao.
Ti pregherei di fare attenzione a modificare strade che sono parte di una relazione.
iD ti ha sicuramente avvisato!
Questa volta sistemo io.
silversurfer83 (2024-10-27 09:05:15+00:00): Moin :)

Hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1328395274 könntest du vielleicht nochmal gucken. Da sieht es aus, als seien dir die Eigenschaften vom Tor auf den Weg gerutscht.

cheers
silversurfer83
Bart- (2024-10-27 11:21:40+00:00): Danke jetzt besser!
silversurfer83 (2024-10-27 08:47:14+00:00): Moin Bart- :)

bei highway=path ist ein tracktype eigentlich nicht als Eigenschaft vorgesehen. Und wenn die Brücke als Oberfläche mit Metall ausgewiesen ist, kann es schon kein "grade3" sein.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158379626
Kees 59 (2024-10-26 15:37:54+00:00): Volgens hier https://www.breda.nl/herinrichting-vlaszak-groener-gastvrijer-en-verkeersveiliger permanent.
silversurfer83 (2024-10-27 08:48:44+00:00): Oh. Ignorier meinen vorigen Kommentar XD
Sorry
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158379821
martien-176 (2024-10-26 19:05:34+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. 

Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline. 

Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158380497
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-27 06:17:06+00:00): I reviewed your edit as requested.  You were pretty close, but I went ahead and corrected the address tag.

Have a good day!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158380775
SomeoneElse (2024-10-28 22:01:44+00:00): Hello,
It looks like a gap had accidentally appeared in the A170 here.  I presume that didn't really happen (it'd have been on the news).  Presumably the footpaths here have been moved to use the crossing to the east, so the Cleveland Way is now https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4087754#map=17/54.238685/-1.208147 and the Three Feathers Walk is now https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6367972#map=18/54.240049/-1.210714 .  The Three Feathers isn't signed, so that is as good as any.  If there's any new signage for the Cleveland Way, it'd be good to add that though, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6899077584 a bit to the west.
Best Regards,
Andy
user_1344 (2024-10-28 22:34:47+00:00): Andy, I can only see the gap in the A170 at a zoom levels 16, 17 & 18, it's there at all others...?!
I'm sorry, I didn't note any new signage, I shall have to return to check.
SomeoneElse (2024-10-28 23:14:20+00:00): Hello,
The gap's gone now, because I filled it in.  Various renderers will catch up at their own speed, and I suspect that OSM's own tile servers are busy because the OSM Carto style has just changed.
Cheers,
Andy
pavvv (2024-10-26 18:14:59+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Dawid2849 (2024-10-27 21:43:11+00:00): to tylko revert edycji użytkownika temat-droga, można wybaczyć brak komentarza :P
birdlawyer (2024-10-30 19:46:02+00:00): Hello, and thanks for your interest in OSM. It appears that the features you're mapping do not exist in reality and so I've reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158556171. Please refrain from mapping features that do not exist on the ground. You can learn more about making accurate and appropriate contributions to OpenStreetMap at https://learnosm.org/. However, if you're more interested in creative mapping, I'd recommend checking out https://www.opengeofiction.net. Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2024-10-26 15:56:38+00:00): Hi rahma24, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 92% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 2 highway(s)
- 83 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=158382599
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-29 05:19:53+00:00): No Response, reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158482124
voschix (2024-11-02 11:04:20+00:00): Ho visto che hai cambiato su node 1308328395 l'etichetta "lit" da "yes" a "automatic". Sei sicuro che si accende automaticamente quando passa qualcuno ("automatic") o solo che viene acceso col buio ("yes").
Warin61 (2024-10-26 23:02:59+00:00): I think you should contact locall mappers before doing these kind of changes.
map per (2025-10-05 08:17:04+00:00): Hello pLoskutov,

please don't add travel advice like "Free Acsess To Melanting WaterFall" to OpenStreetMap. Only objects that exist on the ground should be added.

Thanks and best regards
map per
map per (2025-10-05 08:17:27+00:00): (OSM object: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12290351457/history)
NeisBot (2024-10-26 16:28:48+00:00): Hello Rakiel, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/12290393465

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=158383827
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-26 16:52:31+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158383833

Thanks.
vasony (2024-10-28 18:54:36+00:00): Szia!

Melyik utcaképről dolgoztál?

Tamás
SIDLER22 (2024-10-28 22:43:24+00:00): A Googlésről.
Csak azokat a számokat írtam fel amik látszódtak a képeken. Ami nem látszódott ahhoz kimentem ma és felírtam őket és kipótoltam.
vasony (2024-10-29 04:24:36+00:00): Google streetview nem használható openstreetmap bővítésére.
Ha egyénként utána kimentél ellenőrizni, akkor a survey-t írd be a forrásnak, akkor senki nem tud belekötni.
SIDLER22 (2024-10-30 05:42:52+00:00): Nem mentem ki mindet ellenőrizni. Amiket nem láttam az utcaképen, azokat kimentem személyesen ellenőrizni, de a többi mellett csak elmentem.
Ha ezen múlik akkor nem fogok Contribute-olni.
Éppen elég meló felírkálni a maradék 20-30%-át a házaknak telefonba.
Kutyák ugatnak állandóan + hideg van + mindenki kérdezősködik, hogy "mit csinálsz?", "kinek dolgozol?".
Ha napszámba csinálnám vagy kapnék jutalékot még azt mondom oké. De hobbiból nem fogom ennek kitenni magam. Még a végén rendőrségi ügyem is lesz ebből, amilyen paranoiás az átlag magyar.
Ha ez a probléma, hogy 80%-ot utcaképről írok fel akkor inkább hagyom az egészet.
vasony (2024-10-30 08:21:26+00:00): Igen probléma, mert megszeged az Google ÁSZF-et.  Az openstreetmap account létrehozásával elfogadtad a hozzájárulási feltételeket, ami kimondja, hogy nem sértheted meg mások jogait az adatok hozzáadásával, röviden csak jogtiszta forrásból dolgozhatsz.

Egyébként:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

Ha ezen múlik akkor ne járulj hozzá, nem kötelező, itt a legtöbb ember hobbiból csinálja.

Tamás
Sakari_N (2024-10-26 17:46:59+00:00): Looks like you added some paths and parking way roads. Looks good. I think some of the service roads on the parking lot could be classed as parking aisles, and there's one bit where you have two ways on top of each other. Otherwise dood job!

(That's a funi shaped parkinglot, I wonder who came up with the shape)
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-26 16:41:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2915047849
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/495950642

Pozdrawiam! 🦀