piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mopfus (2025-02-16 07:17:21+00:00): Gracias por corregir los nombres. Sin embargo, en esta región es muy importante para los excursionistas saber cuántas tiendas caben en los lugares y si el lugar está protegido del viento, por ejemplo, por árboles. Para que esto sea directamente visible en el mapa, lo he escrito en los nombres. Casi nadie se fija en los metadatos cuando se practica senderismo en esta región tan solitaria. ¿Hay alguna forma de que los excursionistas puedan seguir obteniendo esta información de forma rápida y sencilla?
Ahora mismo no encuentro el puesto de referencia NNA/B. Creo que te refieres al DN2/3 etc...

Son postes que marcan la caminata "Dientes de Navarino". Por eso "DN". La numeración indica la zona del caminata. Los números cuentan hacia arriba. Yo mismo estuve allí y desgraciadamente no los encontré todos. Pero algunos.
Cada uno de ellos es un poste macizo en el que se fija una señal en forma de rombo hecha de chapa. La señal es blanca con un borde rojo. El texto correspondiente está escrito en la señal, por ejemplo "DN2/3".
Las marcas son útiles para orientar a los excursionistas. Tanto en situaciones de emergencia como si se ha perdido el camino. O si quieres saber dónde estás. Las marcas también aparecen en el mapa de la policía local.
Wilcooo (2025-01-05 16:28:26+00:00): Beide vlaggenmasten stonden al op de kaart, dus ik heb ze weer verwijderd ;)
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-31 20:00:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12466077636

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-01-08 14:35:02+00:00): Hi Tommybara,
I saw that you have added lot of label roles to admin relations. Why are these not added as admin_centre roles?
Tommybara (2025-01-08 15:36:04+00:00): Hi! Thanks for your question. These boundaries are city boundaries (Vietnamese municipalities) so I used the role 'label' for the nodes, rather than 'admin_centre' which is used for state/provincial/county-level capitals. This follows the mapping convention used in relations like San Francisco (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/111968), St Louis (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1180533).
HellMap (2024-12-31 21:13:10+00:00): Thanks for noticing and fixing the mistake!
greyim (2024-12-31 20:39:49+00:00): Add cliffs feature they are distintive of area
BCNorwich (2025-01-01 08:54:11+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The original tags on this highway were correct. It is a designated public footpath extending along Meadowside to Eastwick Drive. So unless there is explicit permission for cycling you are not legally allowed to cycle along here, even though there may be nothing to inhibit/prohibit cycle use.

I've reinstated the proper tags so that the OSM database has the correct information.

Regards Bernard.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2025-04-22 12:08:05+00:00): 
Relation: 10066636 mangler en from
BCNorwich (2025-01-01 09:03:24+00:00): Hi, This again is a designated public footpath, although in this case it looks like the Highway Authority has given permission for cycle use. I've amended the tags.

Regards Bernard.
voltairovicz (2025-01-01 18:56:37+00:00): Dobra robota, właśnie miałem szukać na Discordzie OSMu czy ktoś się zajmuje dodawaniem nowych rezerwatów. Czy wiesz dokładnie ile już dodałeś i czy wszystkie są w ramach akcji 100 rezerwatów na stulecie LP?
Pawel000 (2025-01-01 22:14:59+00:00): Dziękuje, staram się dodawać rezerwaty na bieżąco, gdy tylko pojawiają się w bazie GDOŚ (CRFOP). Dodałem 55 rezerwatów, tyle pojawiło się w bazie od początku grudnia do dziś. Przypuszczam, że wszystkie są w ramach akcji 100 rezerwatów na stulecie LP, ale pewności nie mam.
Glassman (2025-01-01 20:13:09+00:00): The location is in a parking lot. Is the actual location just to the north in the Carrara building?

Also, is the office really open 24/7?
RedAuburn (2024-12-31 22:03:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4571053
Rodrigo Rega (2025-01-01 15:59:05+00:00): Hola.

El comentario de este conjunto de cambios no es lo suficientemente descriptivo para que el resto de usuarios se hagan una idea de cuáles han sido los elementos que se han editado. Por favor, consulta la siguiente página para saber como hacer comentarios que faciliten el trabajo de revisión de ediciones: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios

Gracias por tus aportes a OpenStreetMap.

Un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160849400
NeisBot (2025-02-08 08:06:12+00:00): Hi Novus Annus, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 39 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-09 21:39:22+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160850089
TheSwavu (2025-01-01 05:41:30+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your edit. If you are mapping roundabouts please make sure that the inward and outward ways are not sharing common nodes.

I have fixed this one.

Thanks.
VLD176 (2025-01-02 21:19:24+00:00): Hello, the Swavu, 
Thanks so much for catching that! I have been double checking because I was afraid a couple shared nodes might have slipped through my radar. I’ll keep an extra eye out moving forward.

VLD176
voltairovicz (2025-01-16 21:49:02+00:00): Hej, przez przypadek zmieniłeś drogę asfaltową z Drzewicy do Bielin na zwykłą ścieżkę, przez co nie było tej drogi na mapie i pewnie niektóre nawigacje nią nie kierowało. Uważaj z takimi zmianami proszę na przyszłość i sprawdzaj tereny, na których robiłeś zmiany, by wychwytywać takie błędy. Jak cos już poprawiłem, życzę dobrego mapowania bez błędów ;)
ralley (2025-01-08 19:03:07+00:00): Why have you removed the service road within the carpark (WAY: 1110654367)?  It still appears in the aerial imagery you refer to
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160850285
TheLoyalOrder (2025-01-08 21:01:33+00:00): Kia ora, I forgot to add it back
Shaun das Schaf (2025-01-01 23:01:21+00:00): Hi Diane, please make yourself familiar with OSM tagging first, for example by following the tutorial in the web-editor, or by checking out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide or https://learnosm.org/en/

I fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1347696821 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1347695879, but removed the other changes, as those made no sense.

Best regards,
Shaun das Schaf
𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ (2025-01-03 19:12:38+00:00): second ever changeset in 2025 (gmt)
Lejun (2025-01-01 05:31:48+00:00): Congrats for the 1st changeset of GMT0-zone year!
TrickyFoxy (2025-01-01 09:41:53+00:00): 🥳
𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ (2025-01-03 19:12:00+00:00): congrats for the first changeset in 2025
ilias_ (2025-01-01 04:02:51+00:00): Hello,
Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing.
Please make small changesets, this helps others in tracking changes. You made one edit in the US and one in Australia.
Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thank you.
rempshaener (2025-01-01 12:14:00+00:00): Hallo und ein frohes neues Jahr.

Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.

Das amenity=place_of_worship hast du am Umriss des Gebäudes ergänzt. Das ist eine der Möglichkeiten, derartige Objekte abzubilden. Eine andere Möglichkeit ist, lediglich einen einzelnen Node an die entsprechende Stelle zu setzen. Das war hier bereits der Fall.
Nun gibt es redundante Objekte:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2581124041
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/72705118

Wobei der erste Eintrag auch z. B. den Namen enthält.
D. h. du hast zwei Möglichkeiten: entweder du nimmst das  amenity=place_of_worship wieder vom Umriss runter oder du ziehst die Informationen vom Node herunter und entfernst diesen anschließend.

Wenn du Fragen hast: bitte einfach melden.

Viele Grüße
oliverr (2025-01-01 12:20:59+00:00): Hallo und ich wünsche auch ein frohes und gutes neues Jahr.

Gibt es eine Empfehlung, welche Möglichkeit die bevorzugte/empfohlene ist?

Beste Grüße
rempshaener (2025-01-01 17:03:07+00:00): Hallo,

eine feste Empfehlung gibt es nicht, ich erkenne aber eine leichte Tendenz in Richtung "Fläche".

Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2025-01-01 12:17:52+00:00): Hallo,

ich verweise auf meinen Kommentar zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160851170.
Auch hier müsstest du entscheiden, wie du mit der entstandenen Dublette umgehst.

Es wäre übrigens  noch besser, das Pflegeheim nicht nur auf dem Umriss, sondern auf dem Gelände abzubilden; dieses gehört mit zum Heim.

Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2025-01-01 12:19:26+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160851220
Lejun (2025-01-01 05:25:18+00:00): What do you mean by "in google street view" ?
silversurfer83 (2025-01-01 19:51:30+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

Danke, dass du hilfst die Karte aktuell zu halten.

Deine Beiträge mit der App Every Door sind grundsätzlich hilfreich, da du auch fehlende Informationen zu den Geschäften ergänzt hast, du hast jedoch auch jedes Geschäft mehrfach neu in die Datenbank aufgenommen. Ich hab das mal angepasst :)

Mit der von dir genutzten App kenne ich mich leider nicht sonderlich gut aus. Schlecht ist sie keinesfalls. Fuchs dich noch ein wenig ein und bei Fragen immer raus damit

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160851626
voltairovicz (2026-02-16 08:53:03+00:00): Musisz uważać jak edytujesz, bo zauważyłem przypadkiem, że wcześniejszy dojazd do domow pod adresesm 40-42 zmieniłeś z drogi residential na ścieżkę, w rezultacie żadna nawigacja nie prowadziła do tych domów, podejrzewam, że chodziło o dalszą część trasy w stronę lasu, ale to należy pamiętac ze czasem te drogi są długie i trzeba je rozdzielić
GenericUsername4 (2025-08-30 15:39:44+00:00): Can you explain this to me? I'm getting a bunch of osmose issues thrown up for "Boundary intersection".
ZeLonewolf (2025-08-30 16:33:54+00:00): Boundary tagging belongs on relations, not on member ways. That way member ways are not confused with the parent boundary relation by data consumers etc. If there are geometry issues, that's a separate problem that can be resolved in JOSM.
GenericUsername4 (2025-09-11 14:54:49+00:00): Thank you for the response! So, just to make sure I understand this correctly, it would probably be wise to make these relations, right? Why do we have member ways at all at this point?
ZeLonewolf (2025-09-11 15:34:13+00:00): Relations are just a collection of member ways. I'm not sure what you're asking.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-01 11:34:04+00:00): What kind of remains of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1347706491 are visible in terrain? Are there any whatsoever?

What about all other gone roads you added? How you verify that remains are visible? Can you add note to each of them how they can be spotted while surveying that area?

Why adding no longer existing roads is added with description " Alignment Fixes "?
ratrun (2025-01-01 15:58:01+00:00): Hi, 
this change does not seem to be a good idea. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448845172: you left the descriptive tags of the highway but removed the  highway tag itself. Now there are unconnected ways.
Please fix this on that location and also here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467276748

thanks

ratrun
ZeLonewolf (2025-01-01 16:36:25+00:00): Whoops, must have fat fingered the wrong key. Thanks for alerting me
ZeLonewolf (2025-01-01 22:56:34+00:00): Ok, everything should be set now.  I reverted this changeset and re-created it correctly in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160888051.  Please confirm that everything looks as expected.
ratrun (2025-01-02 05:01:56+00:00): Thanks, looks good now.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:17:33+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801573
citrula (2025-01-02 05:24:04+00:00): again, please don't put advertising text in description - I have removed it.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-29 05:03:05+00:00): Advertising reverted by DWG

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161882304
Taksine (2025-01-01 13:11:44+00:00): 新的编辑者，你好，你应当注意到该地已经有你要编辑的店铺了，请不要重复添加信息。这里是中国，大部分名称只能写中文，俄文应当点击名称框右边那个”+“键，选择俄文加上去。 如果你有更多疑问的话，欢迎来t.me/ruosm跟大家联络

（Google Translate） Здравствуйте, новый редактор! Вы должны заметить, что в этом месте уже есть магазин, который вы хотите отредактировать, пожалуйста, не добавляйте информацию повторно. Здесь Китай, и большинство названий должны быть написаны на китайском языке. Для добавления русского языка необходимо нажать на кнопку «+» справа от поля с названием и выбрать русский язык. Если у вас есть дополнительные вопросы, вы можете связаться с нами по t.me/ruosm

Hello, new editor, you should notice that there is already a store you want to edit, please do not add duplicate information. This is China, most names can only be written in Chinese, for Russian, click the “+” button on the right side of the name box, select Russian and add it. If you have more questions, please contact us at t.me/ruosm
empty_child (2025-01-04 10:46:31+00:00): Hello
Your changes were reverted to the bad quality

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160980240
angys (2025-01-01 08:42:46+00:00): Hii, I think road name is non-applicable for alley, road name normally associated with hour unit at the side facing the road while this alley doesn't have any houses facing it, so technically it is a no-name
silversurfer83 (2025-01-01 21:38:50+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM :)

thank you for your time updating the database.

You have asked for review and I stumbled across this changeset so I will give it a shot:

As your account is only 5 edits old we can't expect an expert mapper so please see my comment as trying to guide you on your learning curve and not as "OH THIS IS ALL SO BAD", ok? Because it's not all bad.

There are, however, some ways you can improve your work:

- please keep it local. You added objects in the US East Coast and in Washington State. Even the two locations in Washington should be two separate changesets. So, please work in one area, upload the changes, then move on to the next area [1]

- buildings: Most of them have right angles in reality. So after drawing them and setting the object to "building" please use the "Q" key on your keyboard to square the angles. Also try to draw the building footprint. Some aerial images are from an angle so it's hard to draw the building footprint. Keep that in mind.
There's at least one building where you included the driveway in the building area. Maybe revisit your buildings and make them a bit nicer :)

If you have any questions, please reach out. There are always people online [2, 3]

happy mapping
silversurfer83

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers
[3] c.osm.org
Marek-M (2025-01-04 14:16:47+00:00): Cześć, rysując drogi, ścieżki, chodniki itd, to dołączaj je do istniejących dróg. Tak samo na skrzyżowaniach dróg należy je łączyć tzw. węzłami. Bez takiego połączenia nie zadziała żadna nawigacja no i oczywiście jest to błędne mapowanie.

Parę takich błędów tutaj wyłapałem i poprawiłem:
https://www.osm.org/changeset/160987489
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160987489
dypa (2025-01-11 11:22:14+00:00): При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra

Пожалуйста при внесении следующих правок используйте теги (Размеченный (нерегулируемый) пешеходный переход)
crossing=uncontrolled
crossing:markings=zebra

Заранее спасибо!
Andrea Musuruane (2025-02-25 15:57:18+00:00): Ciao. E' stato rimosso un incrocio e le due relazioni che lo attraversavano ora hanno dei buchi. Ho sistemato. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160855858
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:17:28+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801572
Megachip (2025-01-04 15:00:01+00:00): https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/reverse.html?lat=52.50689&lon=13.33100&zoom=13

Something is broken 😱
Megachip (2025-01-04 15:05:47+00:00): Bei Zoom 12 und 13
Megachip (2025-01-04 15:07:40+00:00): https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/reverse.html?lat=52.50050&lon=13.30890&zoom=13

Und bei 10, und bei 8
Enock4seth (2025-01-05 11:46:29+00:00): Hi, is the name of these houses and others publicly verifiable information or ? If these are private information please remove and don't add them as names to buildings in OpenStreetMap.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:17:23+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801571
Oskarst_ (2025-03-03 10:58:27+00:00): Hei! Supert at du bidrar til å forbedre OpenStreetMap. Ser du har kartlagt en del parking aisle, men at det ikke alltid ser ut til å bli helt rett. Minner om definisjonen av parking aisles: 

"a subordinated way in a parking lot between rows of parking spaces that vehicles use to drive into and out of the spaces"
christofferv (2025-03-03 12:09:57+00:00): Oidå. Blei mange endringer i det settet der. Fint at du rydda :D
Oskarst_ (2025-03-03 12:57:39+00:00): Har også sett et par driveways du har kartlagt, ville også sjekket ut wikien for den taggen: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=driveway?uselang=en
Dave Venables (2025-01-01 12:19:52+00:00): Please revert this deletion. The bridge exists https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathedral_Green_Footbridge and is visible in aerial images.
Updated https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4571374
Dave Venables (2025-01-01 12:27:04+00:00): The bridge has been temporarily swung to to the riverbank to allow the waters to rise and so is not open today but will be swung back into place soon.
geomaniX (2025-01-01 16:42:20+00:00): Hi there!
The way #1347747092 (from the Pickup Street - is this really the name of the street? :D - to the school) has no values. I guess this wasn't intentional?

Kind regards
geomaniX
HolyArtThou (2025-01-09 23:13:17+00:00): Hi, this is strange – this edit was definitely not intentional. I have no recollection of even making these edits. I wasn't even editing in the same part of the world. 

FWIW, from street view it does actually seem to be the name of the actual street.
YellowSoul (2025-01-07 09:22:08+00:00): Hi, I have noticed that you have recently changed many Spanish motorways from proposed to construction. construction should only be used, when the actual works have started. From the wiki: For projects being planned, where there is little or no evidence for them on the ground, use proposed=* instead. Please consider reverting your changes.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-01 11:10:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288907233

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
literan (2025-01-01 14:03:37+00:00): это не линки между разными дорогами, это такой кривой заезд на улицу 1812 года

откачу
mavl (2025-05-02 05:00:14+00:00): Test comment to check the notifications.
mavl (2025-02-05 14:03:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162167075 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: wrong values for name:en - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161608012].
vlad_lego (2025-01-02 10:18:58+00:00): ok
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160859478
Skylark_H_C (2025-01-16 08:17:14+00:00): Accidentally move? Roads and buildings are highly overlapped.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160859503
TheSwavu (2025-01-01 21:22:26+00:00): Reverting because these changesets broke a number of things and the source of data for the proposed road is not clear, which means we can't tell if we can use it in OSM.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160885910
mrpulley (2025-01-01 21:55:52+00:00): I was in Armidale last week and saw no sign of any of these 'under construction' roads
stosh77 (2025-05-07 03:31:00+00:00): Revised.
stosh77 (2025-04-28 15:23:29+00:00): revised.
mueschel (2025-01-02 10:31:05+00:00): Could you check this building and the adjacent one? They got two roof color tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1347753368
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2025-01-02 19:56:49+00:00): thanks, fixed
kapazao_import (2025-03-14 16:26:42+00:00): Hola, es innecesario y redundante añadir oneway=yes a rotondas, por favor no añadas este etiquetado.
Puedes comprobarlo en la wiki de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:junction=roundabout)
Un saludo
ivanbranco (2025-01-06 10:56:32+00:00): Ciao, website=* dovrebbe riferirsi allo specifico elemento (ad esempio la singola stazione). In questo caso andava utilizzato operator:website=*
eggie (2025-01-01 18:41:01+00:00): Welkom bij OSM. Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
Bemoediging (2025-01-05 14:50:11+00:00): Ik heb het gedaan via Organic Maps. Misschien kun je daar de bestaande adresnode niet aanpassen? Maar bedankt, ook namens de mensen die info willen hebben over deze (mooie) winkel.
Groeten!
Bemoediging
eggie (2025-01-05 15:25:02+00:00): Hoi  Geen idee of je adressen kunt aanpassen. Vast wel, maar hoe?  Geen idee :)

Maar het staat er op Dus weer actueel!
pippo6 (2025-02-18 20:20:58+00:00): Hi, tag fuel:GPL does not exist, did you mean fuel:lpg?

For this station
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12466795348
mrpulley (2025-01-01 21:55:54+00:00): I was in Armidale last week and saw no sign of any of these 'under construction' roads
Jrachi (2025-01-18 16:02:11+00:00): Scusa, ma chi ti autorizza a cancellare path che esistono?
Se hanno i tag sbagliati: cambiali o aggiungi i necessari.
O ti sei messo a mappare per tuo puro piacere?

Ivo
Frans S (2025-01-03 12:01:45+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not connect nodes of a road to other features, like residential areas.
Connect roads to each other (f.i. in residential areas) so that you create a network. 
There are more highways to map. Check the traces, please.
Best regards
Littlethingsmap (2025-01-03 16:59:58+00:00): Quid des routes secondaires (highways ) qui ne semblent pas être praticables en véhicule (type voiture). Beaucoup de chemin à priori pédestres, basculent en "route secondaires non identifiées" alors qu'il semble évident qu'aucun véhicule ne puisse circuler dessus. Ne faudrait-il pas : soit inclure un troisième type de voie, soit ne pas cartographier les chemins lorsqu'ils ne sont pas utilisables par des véhicules?
Littlethingsmap (2025-01-03 17:00:09+00:00): What about secondary roads that don't appear to be drivable by vehicles (e.g., cars)? Many paths, which seem to be pedestrian-only, are classified as 'unidentified secondary roads,' even though it’s clear that no vehicle can navigate them. Shouldn't we either introduce a third type of road classification or avoid mapping paths that are not usable by vehicles?