piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-03-15 08:00:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-03-21 19:45:41+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163922240
geisthugo123 (2025-03-17 23:01:50+00:00): Was sagst du zum Abschnitt der Pfungstädter Straße zwischen B3 und Walther-Rathenau-Straße.
Generell sollte es ja keinen Sprung in der Straßenklasse geben wie hier an der letzten Kreuzung soweit ich weiß oder?
skotek (2025-03-19 20:56:34+00:00): Hi. Deine Argumente sind mir bekannt. Ich habe mich weiter eingelesen und kann dazu kurzfristig keine für mich zufriedenstellende Aussage treffen. An dieser Stelle treffen zwei gleichwertige Straßen aufeinander, die dann im Folgeabschnitt Straßenabschnitt den doppelten Verkehr zu tragen hat. BG
Kovoschiz (2025-03-15 09:44:20+00:00): Please don't make groundless assumptions. The road passes under the tower. It already has `tunnel=building_passage` . It's not wrong.
ivanbranco (2025-03-15 09:09:16+00:00): Hi Lejun,

could you provide a link to the import documentation page? I already tried searching for "MétéoFrance" in the wiki but I found nothing.

thanks and good mapping
Lejun (2025-03-15 10:34:46+00:00): Didn't thought an import documentation would be necessary as it's relatively localized, not a breaking change in any way, and not sure I can share the source (which contains forementioned access tokens). But I'd be glad to discuss about anything deemed necessary.
Lejun (2025-03-15 10:38:43+00:00): Furthermore, none of the imported data is produced by MeteoFrance. In fact it's rather the opposite as they aggregated multiple webcam feeds from various providers (many could be found through common search engines) and locations in a uMap.
LouisXIV (2025-08-29 17:00:51+00:00): Import à revoir, il y a énormément de doublons avec des webcams qui étaient déjà précisément intégrées à quelques mètres de leurs coordonnées sur Météo-France.
ex: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11732322147 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12666322782
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12666322703 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12173827454
Lejun (2025-08-30 08:13:21+00:00): Crotte. Merci de l'info, j'étais pourtant certain d'avoir fait le nécessaire. J'ai vraisemblablement foiré la conflation. Je le reprends dès que possible.
LouisXIV (2025-08-30 09:37:25+00:00): Certaines webcams ont bien été mises à jour, je pense que vous avez simplement fait la conflation avec un rayon trop faible. La position sur le site de Météo-France est vraiment approximative, je pense qu’il faut rechercher les doublons à plus de 100m :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12666322702 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6245033308
Qinyile (2025-03-16 12:58:43+00:00): 终于有人处理这片树林了👍
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 05:00:45+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401664
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 05:00:39+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401661
Filip009 (2025-03-15 11:14:48+00:00): Zdravím, ako je daný cyklookruh značený?
tonyfodora (2025-03-15 16:53:38+00:00): Bude doznačeny najbližšie dni , nakoľko počasie nám to nateraz prekazilo počasie, ale chodník a lávka sú plne funkčné.
Filip009 (2025-03-15 17:09:46+00:00): Trasa bude mať 2 vetvy? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18827512 Bude vyznačená C-čkami? Pod akým referenčným číslom bude v evidencií SCK?
tonyfodora (2025-03-15 20:22:25+00:00): aktuálna trasa vedie po hlavnej ceste (celé zle) , každý kto len trochu pozná ,tak jazdí tú strednú alternatívnu už teraz (po daždi nie je však zjazdná).
Úplne nová trasa bola vytvorená teraz počas týždňa drevenným mostíkom (tú  označíme ako modré "C" a skratkou ABC (alternatívny Bojnický cyklookruh).
žiaľ do evidencie neviem ako pridať.
Filip009 (2025-03-15 22:02:35+00:00): Ste vyškoleným značkárom SCK, alebo tie C-čka maľujete len ako nadšenec?

Vyrábate aj nejaké smerovky, alebo si ich nechávate vyrobiť SCK?
tonyfodora (2025-03-16 06:01:47+00:00): Môžme to nazvať i ako nadšenec, namalujeme , označíme to ako lokálnu alternatívu trasy (určite  krajším prostredím) kto vyskúša,tak super a kto nie . Nevadí. Praktický ani MTB cyklotrasa nieje oficiálna , a neni ani značená a nadšenci si ju nájdu. A je nádherná po celej dĺžke s 360' výhľadmi .
Filip009 (2025-03-16 06:11:20+00:00): Ja sa hlavne snažím zistiť, či je táto cyklostrasa nejak viditeľná v teréne, alebo je len vymyslená, v tom zmysle, že "tu sa ide lepšie, tak to označím ako cyklotrasu". Pretože mapa má zobrazovať realitu. Čiže keď trasa v realite nie je nijak vyznačená, tak v našej mape nemá čo robiť.
tonyfodora (2025-03-16 06:42:43+00:00): Áno ,presne preto bude značená ako C s popisom alternatívnej možnosti. A tak isto i lokálnu MTB trasu je možnosť doznačiť. Inak pre tých čo mapy vedia čítať nieje toto absolútne problém, a ty ktorý nevedia , tak sa stratila i keď by to mali znacene
Filip009 (2025-03-16 06:50:08+00:00): Koľkí pracujete na tomto alternatívnom okruhu? Skúšali ste napísať SCK, aby trasovanie základnej trasy zmenili?
tonyfodora (2025-03-16 07:29:04+00:00): Asi 5 nás je aktívnych a niekoľko pomocníkov. Keď všetko dokončíme, tak možno.
bkil (2025-03-15 10:29:02+00:00): Részben visszavontam a következő hiba miatt, kérjük a jövőben erre figyelni: https://wiki.osm.org/Hungary/Fontos_szempontok#Life_cycle_prefix
https://osm.org/changeset/163644767#map=19/47.276179/19.064916
makiwolf (2025-03-15 10:22:52+00:00): Hallo, 
dein Changeset habe ich im Forum zur Diskussion gestellt. Login ist mit normalen OSM Anmeldedaten möglich.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/osm-editor-will-wikidatas-bei-berggipfeln-loschen/127433
Kovoschiz (2025-03-15 09:48:02+00:00): This is obviously visible on imagery. The road continues on the podium. Please don't fix for validators.
vectorial8192 (2025-03-16 05:05:29+00:00): The validator has been told to shut up via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163674665 .
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 05:00:33+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401657
eggie (2025-03-15 09:13:43+00:00): Hoi..
Je bijdrage zal niet doen in osm.
Ook de aard van her bedrijf toevoegen svp.
..shop=..... ?

Mvg
eggie
Larretto (2025-03-27 16:33:51+00:00): Hoi, 

Wat bedoel je met deze zin?
Je bijdrage zal niet doen in osm. 

Ik heb het type nu ook toegevoegd.

Groeten,
Stef
eggie (2025-03-27 16:44:58+00:00): Hoi  typo niet>niets

Alleen een naam doet niets.
Je hebt het type toegevoegd, maar wellicht 'moet' je no uploaden?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-27 16:48:58+00:00): Misschien komt dit het dichtste bij?
shop=interior_decoration

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dinterior_decoration
Larretto (2025-03-27 17:05:04+00:00): Ik denk dat houseware beter past of niet?
 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dhouseware
eggie (2025-03-27 17:30:11+00:00): Kan ook.....  anders even op het forum vragen.
Het is wel specialistisch. 

Wanneer er een shop=  tag staat zal het in ieder geval zichtbaar worden op de kaart.
Mapse
eggie
Larretto (2025-03-27 17:40:23+00:00): Dat is voor mij niet nodig, het is voor mij duidelijk houseware. Dat omschrijft precies wat zij verkopen.

En wanneer verschijnt zo'n aanpassing dan ook echt op de kaart? Als het uiteindelijk ook door iemand goedgekeurd is of hoe werkt dat?
eggie (2025-03-27 21:02:00+00:00): Er wordt niets goedgekeurd  :)
Het staat direct op de kaart.
Wanneer je niets ziet even je cache legen van je browserscherm.
Paar keer CTRL-F5  Dan zul je de naam en symbool wel zien. 
Er word in het begin wel gescreend en dan krijg je sms aanwijzingen.
Dus voor nu even CTRL-f5.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-27 21:04:52+00:00): De pois heb ik iets uit elkaar gezet. Die zitten elkaar in de weg om goed te renderen.
bkil (2025-03-15 10:22:35+00:00): Visszavontam a következő hiba miatt: https://wiki.osm.org/Hungary/Fontos_szempontok#Life_cycle_prefix
https://osm.org/changeset/163644382#map=19/47.276209/19.064842
osmviborg (2025-03-15 09:04:01+00:00): Udlad venligst at modificere adressepunkterne.
b-holdet (2025-03-15 09:20:05+00:00): @Erik Klausen

Er det denne her oversigt du er ved at lægge ind?

https://www.landal.dk/-/media/files/sdt/sdt_plat.pdf?v=638602124020000000_20250307235407#navpanes=0&view=fitH&statusbar=0
Erik Klausen (2025-03-15 14:30:09+00:00): Det er de 3-cifrede husnumre man bliver præsenteret for i feriecenteret, men det er ikke lige et weekendprojekt at få numrene sat på.

Vh. Erik
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 05:00:26+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401655
Kovoschiz (2025-03-15 09:50:30+00:00): A `=parking_entrance` should not be on the intersecting point between the sidewalk. It should be on the `building=`
vectorial8192 (2025-03-16 04:50:36+00:00): I may have indirectly caused these issue(s); these are cleaned up via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163674517 .
Lezurex (2025-03-15 11:42:44+00:00): Hallo stillhart,

Bitte schau dir nochmals genau an, wie area:highway genutzt wird: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Street_area

Konkret sollte es hier also area:highway=track sein. Ausserdem sollten Kreuzungen separat sein und mit junction=yes getaggt werden, bspw. bei Breitloo-/Hohenstein-/Panoramaweg. Wo der highway=* in die area:highway=* eintritt sollte dann auch ein geteilter Node platziert werden. So ist dann mehr oder weniger klar zu welchem highway die area:highway gehört.

Aber ja, das ganze Tagging-Schema ist noch etwas experimentell.

Übrigens: Mit JOSM und dem "Highway areas" style geht das auch viel einfacher :D

LG Lezurex
stillhart (2025-03-15 15:24:08+00:00): Leider will josm auf meinem 4k screen nicht so skalieren wie ich will. Mal abgesehen davon das mit dem nie warm wurde :-(

Aber danke für die Info, werde das noch anschauen und korrigieren.
Kovoschiz (2025-03-15 09:52:53+00:00): Please don't remove valid info. It needs to be improved as different `building:part=` correctly.
NeisReview (2025-03-15 16:08:18+00:00): #DataImport

Hi, welcome to OSM!

With this changeset, you've added a significant number of features that appear to share similarities in their tags. Could you please let us know more about the source of your mapping activity? Is this a data import?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks!
tastrax (2025-03-22 09:49:01+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 05:00:21+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401654
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 05:00:18+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401653
Kovoschiz (2025-03-15 09:57:12+00:00): This doesn't make sense. Either the `entrance=` should be removed, or the `building=` shape should be corrected. The `building=` is correct. In fact, the `=footway` is `indoor=yes` , meaning both are correct. The `=footway` should only be split.
vectorial8192 (2025-03-16 05:03:46+00:00): Someone should probably go there irl to confirm things, I can see this part of the map is very messy in terms of the footpath shapes. Mainly my concern is about the "paths" that goes into the buildings; might actually be access=private due to being inside the lobby of the building (not for through foot traffic), and then it might not be 100% suitable to include them on OSM.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 05:00:16+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401651
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 05:00:10+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401647
chris66 (2025-05-10 08:27:44+00:00): Hi,
what is an "outpost shop" ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12666412501
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 05:00:04+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401645
josmougn (2025-03-15 23:02:47+00:00): bonsoir, ce n'est pas la peine de préciser 
foot=yes, horse=no, motor_vehicle=no sur highway=footway, c'est implicite (voir la page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#France). 
bicycle=yes ça se discute.
Il semble que ce footway passe sous un immeuble, si c'est bien le cas le couper aux intersections avec le batiment et taguer le passage en tunnel=building_passage.
Merci et bonne continuation dans osm.
watmildon (2025-03-19 04:34:26+00:00): Thanks for adding some mascots into NZ. I had some time to add a few more icons for missing things so the render is a lot nicer now. I'll eventually catch up with everyone's lovely contributions!

Happy mapping!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-22 06:32:06+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17433
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-03-15 12:16:57+00:00): Hi! Thanks for your contributions! Please add the tag access=rpivate to private pool so they are no considered publicly accessible. Thanks!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:59:58+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401643
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:59:51+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401641
pavvv (2025-03-15 11:19:38+00:00): Nie możesz zrobić żeby skrypt Ci jakoś sortował wyniki wg pozycji geograficznej? :I
Albo jak już musisz to wysłaj jeden changeset na jedno przejście. Możesz zrobić nowe konto jeśli nie chcesz mieć tyłu zmian na tym koncie.
pavvv (2025-03-15 11:22:48+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Zestaw_zmian#Geograficzny_rozmiar_zestaw%C3%B3w_zmian
IreuN (2025-03-15 11:33:07+00:00): Postaram się :x
whammo (2025-03-17 00:56:01+00:00): I went ahead and fixed this edit because I'm assuming this law firm does not occupy all of this 12 story building. It is now a separate object from the building. I also removed the marketing language, which is not permitted on OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163644806
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-10 09:33:17+00:00): Fixed addr:street=* abbreviations and moved social media tags to contact:*=* for SEO POI Brownstone Law in changeset 183913668

https://osm.org/changeset/183913668
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:59:49+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401639
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:59:44+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401633
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:59:41+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401630
George Sears (2025-03-16 18:43:00+00:00): Salve, che significa questa nota che ha inserito?
Piersoft (2025-03-16 21:43:31+00:00): Il dae non è visibile. C’è un cartello sul portone del condominio che invita a contattare il proprietario al terzo piano
George Sears (2025-03-16 21:55:10+00:00): Il condominio in questione è quello sul lato opposto della strada? Non ho idea quindi vorrei capire, per utilizzare il defibrillatore bisogna contattare qualcuno quindi?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:59:35+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401628
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:59:29+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401625
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-15 10:50:55+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12666469788

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
yrtimiD (2025-03-15 19:30:10+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!
You deleted here quite a lot intermittent streams. May I ask you why?
SafwatHalaby (2025-03-19 12:41:34+00:00): I am not the original deleter, and don't know if this is a mistake or not.

But I did notice many mapped intermittent streams in Israel simply do not really exist and removed some in the Carmel region. Discussion here: 

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mass-removal-of-intermittent-waterway-in-the-carmel-region/126821
AvivBenSha (2025-03-19 14:42:54+00:00): Hi. As you can see I am new to this whole thing but I find it very interesting and fun. This is an area I have grown up in. I can assure you there are no waterways in any shape or form in any time of the year so I deleted them. Also I redid the Agricultural field mapping to fit every road and field accurately .
yrtimiD (2025-03-19 17:20:26+00:00): Great, just wanted to confirm. Happy mapping!
You also welcome to join our telegram group to discuss any issue you have https://t.me/OSM_Israel
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 20:42:44+00:00): Hello!

You used
motor_vehicle=non
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/896130890/history

Have you maybe meant
motor_vehicle=no
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:59:23+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401621
GerdP (2025-03-16 11:22:56+00:00): Zahlendreher: Radtour am 13.3.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:59:17+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401620
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:59:12+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401615
jb54osm (2025-03-15 12:47:06+00:00): Dag kintrix,

Heeft deze winkel een naam en adres?
Does this store have a name and address?
kintrix (2025-03-15 12:53:40+00:00): It does, but I forgot to note it down when I was there. I later noticed that is is not on OpenStreetMap, but by now I forgot its exact name. Next time I'm there I can check.
jb54osm (2025-03-15 14:40:03+00:00): Thanks. And please know that in The Netherlands we place POIs on the adresnode.
user_22460680 (2025-03-15 23:15:42+00:00): The restaurant is already there (Arena) in the correct location.
user_22460680 (2025-03-15 23:31:08+00:00): Your map in Organic Maps may be outdated, the most recent version is a snapshot of February 13. I saw you added a note, it looks like your map dates to November 2024.
kintrix (2025-03-16 09:26:45+00:00): You are totally right, actually. I did not notice my Organic maps was outdated. Sorry for wasting your time.
jb54osm (2025-03-16 09:50:19+00:00): Glad it's fixed. Every time (~1x per month) the Organic Maps app gets an update via the Play Store there are also updated maps.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:57:50+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401582
Fabian007 (2025-03-15 11:28:04+00:00): .... Das ich beschied weiß.

Danke, in voraus, das ihr damit weiterhilft!

Ich wünsche euch einen schönen Samstag noch!

MFG Fabianbuecheler
Kovoschiz (2025-03-17 16:36:47+00:00): It's possible there's a passageway in between that can be walked through. Please don't directly delete without checking.
NeisReview (2025-03-15 18:15:58+00:00): #DataImport

Hi, welcome to OSM!

With this and your latest changesets, you've added a significant number of features that appear to share similarities in their tags. Could you please let us know more about the source of your mapping activity? Is this a data import?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks!
NeisRevert (2025-03-21 20:38:03+00:00): #hotosm
Halfix (2025-03-17 07:31:31+00:00): I probably have to plead guilty here. At that time, I had drawn in the construction site for the new buildings 103++ and “demolished” the previous buildings in the area on the map and probably “demolished” the garage by mistake. It's a miracle how it survived next to the huge excavation pit. Thanks for the restoration.
The Equalizer (2025-04-08 19:18:11+00:00): Aleks - please be aware, this is not the current boundary, it changed 10 years ago so I have removed the Wikidata code. Once the latest is added then feel free to add the code to it. Thanks
Aleks-Berlin (2025-04-09 17:44:21+00:00): I'm sorry.
But, now I wonder why there is only 1 OSM object having tag ISO3166-2=GB-BFS (which is this one here). Then something important is missing.
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/ISO3166-2=GB-BFS
KR Alex
The Equalizer (2025-04-10 02:39:10+00:00): Without any checks a year plus back, a contributor uploaded the wrong shape. Then another added the ISO code to this wrong shape. That needs removing and the polygon relabelled as historic.
rskedgell (2025-03-15 16:30:08+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, changing the address of a building on Whitechapel Road does not move it to India Dock Road. Also, deleting the building=yes tag implies that the building at 21 Whitechapel Road is no longer there.

The best way for you to add your business at the current address is to add a point at its physical location on the map. Please let me know if you need any help with this.

I have had to revert your edit in order to restore the building and address. Please could you confirm whether Fujifilm at 21 Whitechapel Road has now closed?
NeisReview (2025-03-15 18:21:29+00:00): Should be reverted. 
This is not a building!
NeisRevert (2025-03-21 20:38:53+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163838464
NieWnen (2025-03-15 13:07:49+00:00): Może warto zacząć czytać komentarze pod swoimi zmianami i ich nie ignorować?
grzegorz75jan (2025-03-15 21:04:45+00:00): Witam.
Jestem znanym okrutnikiem w pewnych kręgach OSM.

Jestem też żywotnie zainteresowany pewnymi sprawami związanymi z kontem mwk3 a szczególnie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163590685 pod tytułem znikające lądowisko.

Dodatkowo namiętne, bezpodstawne usuwanie obiektów poprzedników. 
Brak odpowiedzi pomimo wykonywania kolejnych edycji.

Jednym z moich ulubionych zajęć jest wnioskowanie o urlop. Taki malutki np. do czasu odpowiedzi na zapytania ponieważ to bardzo często w cudowny sposób pozwala niektórym odzyskać głos.

NieWnen proszę przypomnieć o sprawie po niedzieli.
mwk3 (2025-03-16 14:57:22+00:00): Dzień dobry, pokornie kajam się. Skontaktowałem się już z NieWnen w prywatnej wiadomości, gdzie wyjaśnił mi błędy, które popełniałem. W kwestii płotów i komunikacji: to błędy początkującego, i wiem już jak ich nie powtarzać

Co do lotniska - usunąłem je być może zbyt niefrasobliwie w oparciu o zbyt wątłe przesłanki jakimi było otwarcie w tym roku lotniska na dachu szpitala, zaś na starym lądowisku jest... parking.

Co do "namiętnego usuwania obiektów poprzedników" to nie wiem, o które zmiany chodzi, więc nie mogę odpowiedzieć.

Kajam się i proszę o wybaczenie.
map per (2025-03-15 17:44:51+00:00): Hallo MichiSoog,

ich hab deinen Wertstoffhof Großhadern wieder gelöscht, weil der Wertstoffhof schon eingetragen war (vgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125174183)

Viele Grüße
map per