piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mueschel (2023-11-10 09:38:56+00:00): Hi,
please check the fuel tags and POIs you added.
- This gas station already exists since more than a year in OSM
- There is no "fuel:CNG" tag, the right spelling is "fuel:cng"
- What does "fuel:CBG" mean? This tag is not used by other people.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-08 22:30:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315053378

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-11 08:04:26+00:00): poprawiono
OSMCowboy (2023-11-09 17:09:35+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-06-21
Gonéo (2023-11-09 09:09:33+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. You requested a review: your changeset seems to be correct.
Gonéo (2023-11-09 09:08:48+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. You requested a review: your changeset seems to be correct.
CaldeiraG (2023-11-09 13:30:40+00:00): Hey, welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing.

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143800698
Friendly_Ghost (2023-11-08 23:34:50+00:00): sorry for the big and awkward bbox. I already reverted my accidental deletion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3651152.
enezeg (2025-03-10 08:13:23+00:00): bonjour, j'y suis allée hier et l'entrée est située  à l'arrière du bâtiment, côté Bouchara. je viens de placer le POI. est-ce qu'il y a une 2eme entrée que je n'ai pas vu ? bonne journée
Guixovitch (2025-03-10 08:59:48+00:00): Bonjour, je ne sais pas, je ne suis pas encore allé dans cet escape game, j'ai juste placé dans le bâtiment sans connaître son emplacement précis.
Je corrige cela, merci des précisions.
Benoît C MdP (2023-11-09 09:01:13+00:00): Bonjour Yanis,

Merci pour ces ajouts très détaillés. Je suppose que tu as les plans sous le coude car il me semble que tout n'est pas encore réalisé sur le terrain.

Bonne continuation

Benoît
whammo (2023-11-09 12:43:15+00:00): Hey, there's a node for Kingstowne already here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3671039765 . Is there a reason you added a second?
whammo (2023-11-10 20:27:10+00:00): FYI, it looks like Joseph RP deleted it in changeset 143872280
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143801111
Gonéo (2023-11-09 09:06:26+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. The tags are correct but I'm not sure litter and mixed are usefull. They're not part of the documented values in the wiki.
Dave Venables (2023-11-16 16:42:43+00:00): The Broadway address and DE22 1AU post code was correct before this change. DE1 3TQ Mansfield Road was for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30250973 1500 metres away where the school relocated to after a fire here
м1т (2023-11-11 18:01:25+00:00): Схема строящегося участка
https://www.subwaytalks.ru/download/file.php?id=48795&mode=view
DreamDreamer (2023-11-24 01:09:30+00:00): Как это относится к моему  changeset?
Mashin (2023-11-09 09:28:31+00:00): There is also "CT ECO Shaded Relief" layer in case the imagery makes it hard to see the streams.
Yury Yatsynovich (2023-11-10 01:12:33+00:00): Yes, I'm using that -- thanks!
Mashin (2023-11-13 16:05:14+00:00): Awesome, thanks for the great work on CT streams!
tguen (2023-11-10 08:28:22+00:00): Hello, I've noticed a couple issues with this changeset that should be addressed.

It looks like you may have aligned the building with a different set of aerial imagery without aligning the imagery to existing data. The building geometry was actually correct before and should be reverted.

The name tag should match the physical signage on site. I'm guessing the bar isn't signed with "(At KEX Portland)", in which case this text should be removed.
tguen (2023-11-18 02:54:34+00:00): I've fixed it. While doing so, I noticed you deleted the building and recreated it. This caused the building's NRHP tags to be lost. For future reference, we prefer to modify existing features so their tags and edit history are retained.
BlueButterfly (2023-11-10 01:42:48+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Bing Streetside
BlueButterfly (2023-11-09 16:41:21+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery.
tastrax (2023-11-09 21:38:10+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features 

To get the + symbol on a mobile device numeric keypad I reckon you will need to do a LONG press on the zero.
I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Pan (2023-11-09 03:02:09+00:00): Wrong changeset comment. It should be : Trient, landuses
Hugues Ross (2023-11-10 00:04:24+00:00): Hold on, why are there now an overlapping footpath *and* sidewalk on Rue King-George? The footpath is also running past the street crossing, which you've somehow gotten to connect to the same sidewalk twice?

Please take some time to re-review and fix some of your recent changes. I understand that you just started making contributions, but OSM is something people use--and rely on--in the real world on a daily basis. Your contributions don't have to be perfect, but there's some really fundamental errors with the footway network here and every single one of your contributions thus far has several validation issues listed.
marczoutendijk_repair (2025-04-28 18:13:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165561074 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for fictitious edits
Matt_ (2023-11-09 03:58:19+00:00): Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_National_Inventory_of_Dams
Ashim Paudel (2024-02-29 16:47:50+00:00): Hi
Your edit looks great. But there is a small issue. While mapping roads, please avoid sharp edges. Happy mapping:)
nitram1234 (2024-02-06 20:06:53+00:00): Thanks for the edit. Its been a while since I've been on campus but its great that you've been pushing the updates forwards!
andrewth1 (2024-02-08 04:06:59+00:00): Thank you for all your effort in mapping the campus too! It's been a great starting point for the mapping I've done.
tastrax (2023-11-09 21:35:25+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features 

To get the + symbol on a mobile device numeric keypad I reckon you will need to do a LONG press on the zero.
I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Asharei (2023-11-12 00:18:35+00:00): Thanks Tastrax, I'm new to this so thanks for the tips, I'll be sure to do that in future and update the phone numbers for some of my other additions
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2023-11-12 10:15:02+00:00): En primer lugar hay carreteras que en su tramo más cercano a la ciudad de Segovia presentan características totalmente diferentes respecto a otras zonas de su recorrido (carriles pintados, quitamiedos, balizas, señalización) y su trafico es enormemente más elevado así como su importancia en la conectividad de la zona. Igualmente reconozco que este es uno de los casos planteados que si pueden ser susceptibles a ser cambiados.
dieghernan (2023-11-12 13:18:47+00:00): Sin embargo el consenso parece claro: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas 

Red Autonómica:  CL-XXX =primary;
Red Complementaria Preferente:  AV/BU/LE/P/SA/SG/SO/VA/ZA-XXX =secondary;
Red Complementaria Local: tertiary;
Red Provincial: AV/BU/LE/P/DSA/SG/SO/VP/ZA-⦰/A/L/P/V-XXXX=tertiary;
Sin Clasificar: SC-AV/BU/LE/P/SA/SG/SO/VA/ZA-XX=unclassified.

Para esos casos hay tags específicos en muchos casos, como road_marking o lane_marking.
cxc (2023-11-15 05:45:48+00:00): Hi, this building and other not exist...
bye
whitepanda (2023-11-16 05:14:49+00:00): Hi cxc,

Thanks for your valuable feedback. I will delete the adjusted building which does not exist as per your feedback.
enezeg (2024-09-23 08:45:38+00:00): Bonjour Louis, j'ai l'impression qu'il y a erreur sur ces adresses : Il n'y a pas de correspondance avec le cadastre. Je n'ai pas été voir sur pifomètre mais est-ce que tu valides ou on corrige ? à + et bonnes contributions ;)
Louis-64 (2024-09-23 09:05:55+00:00): Bonjour enezeg, j'ai précisément importé ces adresses depuis pifomètre. Suite à ta remarque je suis allé vérifier sur la adresse.data.gouv.fr (https://adresse.data.gouv.fr/base-adresse-nationale/22118_0174_00017#14.84/48.44353/-2.02048)
En effet, ces adresses ne sont pas mentionnées. Sur le cadastre les parcelles indiquent à minima une répartition très suspecte des numéros de maison du point de vue de leur localisation.
La solution serait d'aller voir sur les lieux comment les choses sont renseignées... Je serai d'avis de supprimer les données douteuses plutôt que de laisser du faux; j'ignore à l'heure actuelle où en est l'avancement de la construction de la résidence.
Glassman (2023-11-10 18:35:27+00:00): #TIP: User a short changeset comment that better describes what you added or changed. It helps others and yourself looking at past edits.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143809147
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-11-09 08:35:13+00:00): Hi Thoại, please check this gate carefully. If you put access = no here, Cong Hoa garden apartment can not book trip. I think you should put a gate deep inside this road.
flohoff (2023-11-09 11:44:33+00:00): Moin,
dieser changeset ist in der routenüberwachung aufgefallen.

Du hast hier durch den Kreisverkehr an der Waldstraße einen spange durchgezogen - das sieht jetzt ziemlöich kaputt aus. 

Existiert der Kreisverkehr nicht mehr ? Und da sind jetzt diverse Straßen übereinander. 

Ich tendiere dazu das eher zu revertieren.

Flo
flohoff (2023-11-09 11:48:24+00:00): Und auch die herabstufung der B1 von trunk auf Primary ist aehm - ich glaube nicht konsensfähig. Trunk sind Kreuzungsfrei gebaute Straßen einer Bundesstraße in der Bedeutung ähnlich (Genaue definition müsste ich wiki nachsehen) - Die B1 ist an der Stelle Kreuzungsfrei gebaut - also wäre trunk richtig.

Ich habe den changeset mal auf der osm-owl mailingliste zur diskussion gestellt weil ich zu weit weg bin als das zu beurteilen.

Flo
flohoff (2023-11-09 11:49:04+00:00): 
https://gt.owl.de/pipermail/osm/2023-November/005205.html

Wenn du dich auch subscriben möchtest:

https://gt.owl.de/mailman/listinfo/osm
Galbinus (2023-11-09 12:39:19+00:00): Hallo Tkuro, Deine Änderung an der B1 und auch an den Ortsdurchfahrten widersprechen eindeutig den OSM-Regeln zur Einstufung von Straßen. Sie müssen daher unbedingt wieder rückgängig gemacht werden. Wenn Du wissen willst, wie man Straßen korrekt eigruppiert, wende Dich an erfahrene OSM-Mitwirkende wie z.B. Flohoff oder mich, wir sind gerne behilflich oder informier Dich hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org oder hier https://community.openstreetmap.org
Galbinus (2023-11-09 13:32:18+00:00): Du hast zudem bei Kohlstädt eine Linie zu einer Straße gemacht, die gar nicht als Straßenline gedacht war und nun sind dort zwei Straßen übereinander eingezeichnet.
flohoff (2023-11-10 09:13:45+00:00): 
Ich habe den changeset in gänze revertiert.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-09 08:00:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315053306

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-11 08:02:30+00:00): poprawiono
StefDeGreef (2023-11-10 11:40:42+00:00): Hello :) Je pense que tu t'es planté en rajoutant un parking vélo ici - l'image que tu as ajouté est un peu plus haut dans la rue (Le Batonnier vs. le Nabu):

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11293041151
SachaBe (2023-11-10 13:34:18+00:00): Quel oeil de lynx !! :) :)

Corrigé, j'ai déplacé la photo sur 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11331696364

Belle journée :)
StefDeGreef (2023-11-10 14:30:35+00:00): Mais est-ce que le parking devant Nabu existe ou pas? Je ne le vois pas sur le dernier Mapillary de Raphael.
SachaBe (2023-11-10 17:16:10+00:00): Je suis allé vérifier et il n'existe pas.
Sans doute un point que j'avais mal placé via cyclofix. Deleted
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2023-11-12 00:26:50+00:00): Solamente darte la enhorabuena por todas estas ediciones relacionadas con usos de suelo, son realmente útiles y te felicito por lo bien que están quedando.
dieghernan (2023-11-12 08:22:36+00:00): Gracias Arturo, lo estoy realizando según las ocupaciones de suelo de SIOSE 2014, por si te interesa, pero teniendo en cuenta en la medida de lo posible lo ya mapeado si es correcto, ya que en 10 años las cosas cambian. Hay zonas que están bastante mal (entorno de Riofrio por ejemplo) pero dada la relevancia en la provincia de este Real Sitio lo dejaré para una fase posterior, porque es una tarea muy laboriosa
dieghernan (2023-11-12 08:26:07+00:00): Me refiero concretamente a esta zona de matorral https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143810961
dieghernan (2023-11-12 08:28:18+00:00): Perdón, esta https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15018993
Filip009 (2023-11-11 15:46:23+00:00): Ahoj, vďaka za prispievanie do OpenStreetMap.

Pre kultúrny dom je potrebné pridať ešte tagy amenity=community_centre a community_centre=cultural_centre https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:community%20centre=cultural%20centre

Pokiaľ máš nejaké ďalšie otázky neváhaj sa spýtať v slovenskej OSM komunite https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk
Filip009 (2023-12-30 09:25:36+00:00): Zdravím, odporúčam ti zapnúť si filtre aby si si skryl hranice, lebo si k nej v tomto changesete pripojil bus miesto zastavenia. https://youtu.be/q59kIyirKzM?t=831
Herman Lee (2023-11-16 09:36:44+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144086380
mcliquid (2023-11-09 09:25:05+00:00): Vielen Dank!
Regina Rist (2023-11-09 16:49:42+00:00): Wann werden diese Änderungen enn in der Kartenansicht sichtbar? Hier stehen entweder keine Namen oder z.B. Rosenhof statt Chalets
mcliquid (2023-11-09 17:11:41+00:00): Das hängt ganz davon ab "welche" Karte. OpenStreetMap ist nur die Datenbank. Die Karte unter openstreetmap.org wird etwa alle 5 Minuten aktualisiert. Die Änderungen sind aber oft noch nicht im Cache des Browsers. Dafür einfach gleichzeitig STRG und R auf der Tastatur drücken.
eggie (2023-11-09 09:45:49+00:00): Dag Barrt,

Hier is in ieder geval iets niet goed gegaan. Je hebt de duiker nu verbonden met het kruispunt Speigeling.
Adresnode Kompas 14 heb je verplaats naar een ander deel van Maassluis.
Denk door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143812991
We tekenen geen steraten in die nog niet bestaan. Je kunt wel highway=proposed met proposed = residential name=...   intekeken.
Zodra er gewerkt wordt aan de weg dan wordt het highway=construction.
Ik zie nu nog geen enkele activiteit. 
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=09-11-2022&loc=51.93481%2C4.239929%2C19z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-10-17&acqid=20231017_110049_PNEO-03_1_1&sensor=Pleiades-NEO

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-11-09 09:51:36+00:00): Ik heb wat aangepast...  Zodra er wordt gebouwd kan de landuse omgezet worden in landuse=construction
MVG
eggie
bart 1962 kerkhof (2023-11-09 09:55:04+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

als ik en uitzoom gaat ook de straatnaam Horizon aan en uit. bij inzoomen verdwijnt de naam.

groet Bart
eggie (2023-11-09 11:23:27+00:00): Ahh...  dat is gewoon je cache van je scherm. Even CTRL f5 toetsen.
Bear-in-a-box (2024-12-09 10:53:11+00:00): Please check again. there are no signs coming from the forest. Please revert your change.
joost schouppe (2024-12-09 11:01:00+00:00): I verified with mapillary, there's a link in the source to one example but I reviewed in several places. Please provide proof stronger than mine :)
Bear-in-a-box (2024-12-09 11:15:17+00:00): That's the wrong "proof". It is from Chemin du Pachy. Coming from Brassinelaan, there is nothing that prevents cyclists to go on the main road.
joost schouppe (2024-12-09 13:09:56+00:00): That would be an argument to change https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1118852989, but you're asking me to change 15 segments.
At the next place you can enter, there's a motor road sign: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.767583199971995&lng=4.442881400000033&z=19.9&pKey=2808831149428051&focus=photo&x=0.5476198500933748&y=0.26358562203277325&zoom=0&trafficSign=all
To me it seems they just forgot a traffic sign there. I'll check with the municipality. Are you aware of other missing signs?
joost schouppe (2024-12-10 09:01:08+00:00): Update: the municipality confirmed the lack of signs is a mistake. By the end of January new signs should have been placed there.
Bear-in-a-box (2025-12-17 11:11:19+00:00): Are the signs in place? please send a confirmation picture. until then, please do no change the reality on the ground
joost schouppe (2026-01-05 16:10:40+00:00): You can see the new sign on recent Streetview imagery: https://www.google.com/maps/@50.7363467,4.4233677,3a,15y,243.91h,88.05t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1snTlK3wTZi90ASYBqMlIvvg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D1.949940606840613%26panoid%3DnTlK3wTZi90ASYBqMlIvvg%26yaw%3D243.9124250515025!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MTIwOS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
Bear-in-a-box (2026-01-08 13:30:07+00:00): to be honest, i don't really see proof here. The only sign that is clearly identifiable on the nearly fallen over signpost (belgium...) is the give-way sign on top. The rest could be anything.
joost schouppe (2026-01-08 13:55:48+00:00): If you look at older Mapillary images, you can see the lowest sign was not there in the past. The municipality said they would put a "bicycles forbidden" sign on that place. On recent images, there is a new sign, that has the shape and color of a bicycles forbidden sign. I agree that's not absolute proof. I would say though that it's 99.9999% likely that the simplest explanation is the correct explanation - and that means it is very likely that OSM is still wrong.
Bear-in-a-box (2026-01-08 14:12:08+00:00): Could be, but it could also be any C-sign except C5 or C7 which would not make sense. C9 to C19 would all make sense, so I don't buy your 99,9999% chance.
joost schouppe (2026-01-09 09:52:58+00:00): Yes, there are other options. But again, the municipality said they would place a sign forbidding bicycles on a place where it makes sense to forbid bicycles and there is a new sign that looks like the sign they would say they would place...
Do you have a special motivation to go against this reasoning?
mcliquid (2023-11-09 09:27:39+00:00): Ist die Wasserrettung jetzt ein Schwimmbecken?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8626622492/history
mdieter (2023-11-09 15:04:50+00:00): .......aus dem Schwimmbecken wurde ein Gebäude, habe ich zuerst falsch eingetragen.
mcliquid (2023-11-09 09:49:06+00:00): Liegt das Gebäude vollständig unter der Erde oder wozu dient "layer-1"?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1215938723/history

Und warum hast du leisure=swimming_pool entfernt, aber swimming_pool=outdoor belassen? Ist es jetzt noch ein Pool oder ein Gebäude?
mdieter (2023-11-09 14:17:46+00:00): Das Gebäude hat ein unterirdisches Geschoss und ein oberirdisches Geschoss. Habe ich korrigiert.
Du musst mir schon etwas mehr Zeit geben, bei der Eingabe habe ich fälschlicherweise Pool eingezeichnet, und musste es in ein Gebäude umwandeln.
AdrienHegy (2024-04-13 13:37:29+00:00): Bonjour,
Je me suis permis de supprimer la clé-valeur name=Domicile. Elle n’a pas sa place dans la base OpenStreetMap.
J’imagine que vous n’aviez pas forcément conscience que votre modification serait publiée.
Adrien Hegy
Simon Florimond (2024-04-13 15:32:00+00:00): Bonjour,
Effectivement, elle a dû être ajoutée depuis Gnome Maps, ça n'était pas intentionnel. Merci de l'avoir supprimée, vous avez bien fait.
mcliquid (2023-11-09 09:47:49+00:00): Warum änderst du "swimming_pool=outdoor" zu "swimming_pool=swimming"? Letzteres ist nicht dokumentiert und enthält keinen Mehrwert. Was war deine Absicht?

Schau dir bitte die dokumentierten Werte hier an: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:swimming_pool
mdieter (2023-11-09 14:03:19+00:00): Du hast recht, habe ich wieder rückgängig gemacht. Danke für den Hinweis!
Warin61 (2023-11-26 01:33:18+00:00): Hi,
Foot paths are at 'ground level' .. so layer=0 ... not layer=-1. Setting them at layer=-1 leads to conflicts with under ground tunnels for roads and train lines...
gregor_v1 (2026-02-26 13:44:59+00:00): As the owner of the house on Knooppunt: 62 Boomgaardstraat (11335476972), I can tell that there is not a childcare in there
Zverik (2026-02-26 14:18:21+00:00): Hey Gregor, thanks for correcting me! I've removed the childcare: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11335476972
mcliquid (2023-11-09 09:45:21+00:00): Der Name vom Fußballplatz ist nicht wirklich "Soccer". Bei beschreibenden Begriffen lassen wir "name" einfach weg.
mdieter (2023-11-09 15:02:27+00:00): "Soccer" habe ich auf deinen Ratschlag hin entfernt.
eggie (2023-11-09 10:09:24+00:00): Dag Bart... name=Gesloopt is niet de naam van het gebouw en hoort dus niet op de kaart.
Wanneer een gebouw gesloopt is kan het van de kaart. ben je bang dat iemand het weer intekent dan tag je zo'n gebouw met demolished:building=yes 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished:building

Dan zie je het ook niet meer op de kaart.
MVG
eggie
zh_bva (2023-11-27 11:26:45+00:00): Доброго дня! Будинок було замаплено як два, з різними адресами (way 1002934507, way 1002934508). Ви їх видалили та нанесли один контур заново (way 1222203002). При цьому ми: 1) втратили історію змін по видаленим Вами контурам, 2) інформації на видалених лініях було внесено більше, ніж Ви додали на новий контур (дата початку будівництва, поверховість, матеріал). Скажіть, будь ласка, чому Ви обрали шлях видалення/створення, а не коректування існуючих даних?
eggie (2023-11-09 10:17:32+00:00): Als voorbeeld even aangepast met demolished:building=
name=Gesloopt verwijderd
Gr eggie
eggie (2023-11-09 10:10:20+00:00): Nier correct.. Probeer wat met de feedback te doen
MVG
eggie
bart 1962 kerkhof (2023-11-09 10:17:00+00:00): ik heb de panden nu uit de kaart verwijderen. Nabij de Tollenstraat is het straat werk onlangs ook veranderd. Ik weet niet goed hoe dit te verbeteren.
https://app.pdok.nl/viewer/#x=77650.69&y=437777.11&z=13.3841&background=BRT-A%20standaard&layers=2891cc29-0a79-46d1-8649-287046d621c7;standaardvisualisatie
eggie (2023-11-09 10:25:59+00:00): Oke...   Hier nog even dat pand verwijderen.
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=09-11-2022&loc=51.92306%2C4.261402%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-11-03&acqid=20231103_111951_SVNEO-02&sensor=SuperView-NEO

Je kunt het vlak opvullen met een vlak landuse=construction.  Gebeurt er voorlopig niets dan landuse=greenfield.
Gewoon proberen. Ik kijk straks wel even.

gr eggie
eggie (2023-11-09 11:19:42+00:00): 'k Denk dat uploaden niet gelukt is. Het gebouw Gesloopt heb ik verwijderd.
gr eggie
eggie (2023-11-09 11:28:30+00:00): Voorlopig even die Tollenstraat verwijderd als construction. Die liep door de nieuwe achtertuinen. 
Zal zo nog even kijken, maar wellicht weet jij hoe het loopt?