piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2023-07-19 12:13:53+00:00): Dag T honie  Wat is access=designated? 
Wie mogen er niet op deze paden komen? Dat kun je wel taggen. 
Beter access=designated verwijderen verwijderen.
En onderin is iets 'geks'gebeurd.
Zie https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=138712058
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-19 12:15:38+00:00): spinnenweb heb ik verwijderd
eggie (2023-07-19 12:17:39+00:00): access=private weer toegevoegd... Je kunt foot=permissive toevoegen als je er mag wandelen. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-19 12:48:26+00:00): foot permissive toegevoegd
thoniekroon (2023-07-19 13:13:31+00:00): Hoi Eggie, ja is inderdaad verboden toegang bord met vrij wandelen. dus zal dan zo kloppen.. thx
L'imaginaire (2023-07-21 07:22:18+00:00): Voor zover ik weet, is er niet echt een specifieke waarde voor een klaphek (we zouden er wel een kunnen voorstellen). Meer generiek kan je natuurlijk ook gewoon barrier=gate gebruiken.
habi (2023-07-19 13:54:36+00:00): Ciao mem9

Du hast hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4967585322/ von einem Trinkwasserbrunnen in ein WC umgewandelt.
Stimmt das?

Gruss,
habi
mem9 (2023-07-19 14:45:30+00:00): Nein scheint mir ausversehen passiert zu sein. Tut mir leid. Danke für die Aufmerksamkeit. Willst du es gleich ändern?
habi (2023-07-19 16:55:19+00:00): Ich hab' den Trinkwasserbrunnen mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138726624 zurückgesetzt. Und den beschreibenden Namen auch grad entfernt.
user_17222985 (2023-07-19 11:55:35+00:00): https://t.me/DecolonizationUkraine/7348?single
moje_konto (2023-07-19 15:47:05+00:00): Taa, istotnie kiepsko wyszło. Znacznik ścieżki dodałeś do granicy płatnego parkowania.

Więc jest to w całości do wycofania.

Najlepiej poczytać na Wiki o edycjach, by dodać prawidłowo. Lub ewentualnie dodać notkę:
prawy myszy → Dodaj uwagę tutaj

Notki widać po wybraniu:
Warstwy → Uwagi

Choć jest ich dużo, więc zanim ktoś wprowadzi, to może potrwać.
moje_konto (2023-07-19 16:02:08+00:00): www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138724246
Wycofałem błędną edycję.

Ścieżkę trzeba narysować osobno, zgodnie z fotomapą.
moje_konto (2023-08-13 19:20:16+00:00): www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139839425
Ktoś właśnie narysował ścieżkę na brzegiem.
szydzio (2023-08-14 15:07:11+00:00): Hej, tak jest, wybrałem się na spacer i wyrysowałem po śladzie gps/zdjęciach orto. Sorki, że nie przywracałem starej ścieżki tylko wyrysowałem od nowa, nie miałem już głowy szperać w historii obiektów. Pozdr!
moje_konto (2023-08-14 20:40:03+00:00): @szydzio: dobrze zrobiłeś! Właśnie trzeba było ją narysować osobno, bo jej nie było (chyba że istniała kiedyś o wiele wcześniej, ale tak daleko historii nie sprawdzałem).

W tej edycji dodano znacznik ścieżki na granicy parkowania, więc szła o wiele za daleko i w złym kierunku.

Poprzedni komentarz dodałem, by autor edycji wiedział, że już pojawiła się prawidłowo naniesiona ścieżka.
eggie (2023-07-19 12:39:50+00:00): Dag Jan-Willem   .. Lijkt me oke.
MVG
eggie
arjunaraoc (2023-07-19 12:53:34+00:00): Please explain what is meant by incorrect modelling. 
Please keep changsets to as close as possible to the level of a district when changing local features for ease of review. Please use hashtags=#Swiggy when uploading.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138714375
deept (2023-07-20 08:29:58+00:00): Thanks For Highlighting. I have created one Road and added One-way Directionality for both the roads
( Secondary Road-Perambur High Road) as per the imagery. Hashtag has been already added for the mentioned Changeset.
arjunaraoc (2023-07-20 09:42:12+00:00): Thanks for clarification. Your usage of hashtags is incorrect. Please check with your coordinator.
eggie (2023-07-19 12:42:06+00:00): Denk dat ze niet in de BAG staan en dus niet geïmporteerd zijn.
Dus zelf intekenen is dan prima.
Bij nieuwe gebouwen kun je een importverzoek doen op het forum van OSM.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43
groet
eggie
Marc_ch (2023-07-19 20:49:19+00:00): Bonjour,
vous vous êtes contenté d'effacer le building comme noeud et avez oublié de desciner le building comme une aire
Salutations,
Marc
imagoiq (2023-07-20 05:44:23+00:00): Bonjour,
Effectivement, n'est ce pas légèrement plus correct d'avoir uniquement un noeud adresse pour l'instant (en attendant d'avoir une source pour l'aire) ?
imagoiq (2023-07-20 05:54:48+00:00): Je vois que les deux sont possibles sur le wiki sans préférence. Je remettrai ce soir les tags building
Marc_ch (2023-07-19 20:51:50+00:00): Bonjour,
de quel batiment comme noeud parlez-vous ?
Salutations,
Marc
Marc_ch (2023-07-19 20:53:06+00:00): Bonjour,
pourriez-vous adapter le commentaire à ce qui est réelement fait ? je ne vois que l'ajout d'une piscine et non pas la conversion noeud->aire d'un bâtiment
Cordialement,
Marc
imagoiq (2023-07-20 05:45:47+00:00): Effectivement celui-ci est une erreur
Frans S (2023-07-26 14:59:18+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
We welcome you as a new mapper.
I am sorry to say, but your mappings do not meet the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. ( see attached document for more info)

A: Not accurately drawn.
E. Buildings not squared.
Your mappings are often oversized. Take the time to map more precisely.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138715528
NorthCrab (2023-07-22 16:34:33+00:00): `source` powinien może być wikidata;OSM aby wspierał parsery kilku wartości. Przecinek nie jest taki standardowy raczej. No i wtedy bez spacji.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-23 06:53:16+00:00): zmieniłem
Marc_ch (2023-07-19 20:54:58+00:00): Bonjour,
vous avez le tag building sur les noeuds mais vous avez oublié de renseigner les aires. je me demande bien quel source vous allez utiliser poue le faire
Salutations,
Marc
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-19 12:50:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10923641138
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190594870

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-19 12:50:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/888630845

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2023-07-19 14:48:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
We welcome you as a new mapper.
I am sorry to say but your mapping needs some improvements.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. ( see attached document for more info)



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138715917
Frans S (2023-07-19 14:51:10+00:00): Hi. Another point.
Don't alter or remove the hashtag with project info when you upload your work.
Just put your own comment after them on the same line.
Best regards
gscholz (2023-07-22 07:31:40+00:00): Hi Eduarda14,
your recent changesets have created a bunch of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-52.60797&lat=-18.55371&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

As you may know, this kind of errors irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Frans S (2023-08-06 12:46:04+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
We welcome you as a new mapper.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
Don't you use a mouse to draw?  your mappings are rather sloppy.
A: Not accurately drawn.
E. Buildings not squared.
Please take a look to this webpage and see the differens between your, and well mapped buildings


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138716125
Frans S (2023-07-19 14:15:45+00:00): Hello. We welcome you as a new mapper.
Please read the instructions what to be mapped. This is a building project.
Please focus on that. Landuse areas are not to be mapped through the tasking manager. It limits your mappings to the particular task.

There are many buildings that still need to be mapped in this task.

Please only mark the task as complete when it is fully mapped according to the project requirements in the task instructions. If you want to move on and try a different task, just say "no" to the "Is this task completely mapped?" question or use the "select another task" button.
Best regards and keep mapping.
Frans S (2023-07-19 14:05:14+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping .
We welcome you as a new mapper.
Please don't add hashtag as a description to an object you mapped.
These hashtags are only to be used on the description on TM which you did as well.
Don't forget to square a building with the Q key when it is still selected.
You overlooked several buildings.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2023-07-19 13:57:20+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Not all buildings have been mapped.
Why do you tag buildings as buildingpart=yes. By accident ?
default is building=yes. 
I corrected them
Best regards
Patchi (2024-10-09 05:23:32+00:00): Bonjour Romainluc,

Un peu tard pour poser une question concernant ces modifications, mais je ne comprends pas trop l'intérêt d'avoir des lignes de Bus sous un nom de réseau différent.

Réseau "Les Bus de la Côte Bleue" :
C7 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16108739 
C8 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16113422 
C8 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16375149
C7 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16375445
C6 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16380366
 
Réseau "Les bus de la Côte bleue" :
C7 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16108740
C6 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16112685
C6 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16112686
C6 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16112768
C6 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16112769

Ne serait-il pas mieux d'avoir un seul et même réseau (sans doute "Les Bus de la Côte Bleue" car plus approprié) pour toutes ces lignes ?

Bonne continuation,

Patchi.
Elarayn (2024-10-09 10:52:24+00:00): Bonjour Patchi,

J'ai créé ces lignes/relations en plusieurs étapes, et des erreurs ont pu se glisser. Avoir le même nom serait effectivement plus approprié !

Cependant, je me suis rendu compte quelque temps plus tard que les lignes C6 et C7 sont devenues des "Bus à la demande". Je pense qu'il faudrait les supprimer car elles ne sont plus pertinentes.

Cordialement, Romainluc.
arjunaraoc (2023-07-22 11:04:12+00:00): Please add  villages as a node, rather than the name of the area.  I have done it as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138847532
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138717159
osmviborg (2023-07-19 13:31:44+00:00): port gennem bygning tagges således 'tunnel=building_passage' ingen layer
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage
Antilogik (2023-07-19 15:23:58+00:00): Mange tak. Det vil jeg huske!
b-holdet (2023-07-20 20:29:56+00:00): Der er vist en del af mine rettelser jeg så skal have gennemgået. Havde ikke lige set at layer=* ikke skulle med. Tak for info.

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1xLQ
osmviborg (2023-07-21 05:17:11+00:00): https://tinyurl.com/2hgao2zj
b-holdet (2023-07-21 05:20:20+00:00): Lader til at være en generel opfattelse, at layer skal med.
Milhouse (2023-07-22 13:18:37+00:00): Hi, I think the source for this change may be out of date - this area is currently a building site and I don't think these ways exist any more, with under construction buildings occupying much of the space. Do you have access to recent satellite imagery?
Mapillary imagery from a year ago here - it hasn't changed much since then:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1472344493255262
syntex (2023-11-09 14:01:16+00:00): skąd te obrysy? niezbyt pasują do adresów i działek
YacoobPL (2023-11-10 11:29:50+00:00): Z WMS Ewidencji budynków, z której obecnie budynki zniknęły. Może mieli coś źle wbite?
PLima785 (2023-08-01 16:42:32+00:00): Falta a relação nos lugares de estacionamento no Auchan da Maia, deve se manter a área total do parque e depois colocar os lugares individuais
dmfr (2023-08-01 17:12:33+00:00): Estás a sugerir que crie uma relação com type=site e site=parking, e adiciono todos os lugares de estacionamento individuais do Auchan da Maia a essa relação, como recomendado neste link? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?oldid=629318#Site_relation

Se estiver errado, pedia-te o favor de indicares um exemplo no qual me possa basear para perceber melhor o que queres dizer.
julcnx (2023-07-19 15:49:29+00:00): Hey. Thanks a lot for your contributions! Just a quick tip for next time, make sure to save and upload your changes before moving to the next area. Adding a clear description also helps with reviews. Keep up the awesome work!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138717839
gscholz (2023-07-22 07:31:44+00:00): Hi Eduarda14,
your recent changesets have created a bunch of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-52.60797&lat=-18.55371&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

As you may know, this kind of errors irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-09-24 15:21:07+00:00): alem do erro citado acima ficou faltando o tipo de superficie nessas vias tambem
kuhni74 (2023-07-19 14:23:22+00:00): I'm aware that in the LMI "geographical names" layer, there is a peak called like that here, but in no other map (old Atlas or new map https://atlas.lmi.is/kortasafn-lmi/?map=843) is a peak named like that on this position (only further north), I think this is an error in LMI data.
kuhni74 (2023-07-19 14:24:57+00:00): by the way, the ele should be 272 or 278 according to LMI
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 21:36:48+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145307844
habi (2023-07-21 13:19:16+00:00): Ciao Celina

Das Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41476773 existiert in OpenStreetMap schon seit ein paar Jahren, du hättest es nicht als https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190610339 neu erfassen müssen, sondern hättest einfach dem schon bestehenden Gebäude die korrekten Addressdaten zuweisen können.
Ich habe das korrigiert.

Gruss,
Habi
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-07-19 18:02:15+00:00): Hi, it would be very hard for other mappers and consumers to identify what this is without any additional tags.
user_5359 (2023-07-19 18:07:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/way/252284200. What is the mean of the foreign tags
category = services à la population
thematique = salles polyvalentes
?
user_5359 (2023-08-04 14:17:41+00:00): Nous attendons votre réponse !

Bienvenue sur OSM ! Jetez un coup d'œil sur https://www.osm.org/way/252284200. Quelle est la moyenne des balises étrangères 
category = services à la population 
thematique = salles polyvalentes 
?

traduit automatiquement
I-76 (2023-12-18 18:06:25+00:00): Looks like you created 3 of them on top of each other! I fixed it for you.
pkoby (2023-12-18 18:09:07+00:00): Oh, this must be one of the times I had a bug in Every Door (I don't think it's fixed, but I know what to watch for). I thought I got them all. Thanks!
I-76 (2023-12-18 19:53:47+00:00): Now I fixed it (forgot to submit the changeset till now)
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-20 01:23:45+00:00): I'm pretty sure I have commented before on other edits by you.  When you are adding roads, do not add them incorrectly as golf cartpaths simply for your game or whatever.  They should be added using the correct tags.

Specific roads in question - the parking lot.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138720057
literan (2023-07-19 16:47:02+00:00): Медси задублировали, она там давно отмечена
DressyPear4 (2023-07-19 17:28:26+00:00): Olá, não exagere no tamanho das geometrias, concentre-se em pequenas áreas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138720799
rarad74 (2023-07-19 20:09:49+00:00): Please write in Romanian Language.
Andras (2023-07-19 20:25:29+00:00): Am scris numele strazilor si in romana.
gscholz (2023-07-22 07:31:48+00:00): Hi Eduarda14,
your recent changesets have created a bunch of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-52.60797&lat=-18.55371&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

As you may know, this kind of errors irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-12 06:18:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11054994992/history has id = vhm 162 that was added in this edit
What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?
Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Or maybe this key can and should be documented as useful tagging schema?
Gand' (2025-11-12 08:10:07+00:00): That's a reference written on the station
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-12 12:58:28+00:00): then https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref would be a better fit, right?
Gand' (2025-11-12 13:43:30+00:00): I honestly have no opinion over it ;)
Be my guest to correct it accordingly !
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-13 07:19:40+00:00): edited
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-20 07:29:05+00:00): comments were in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3784974

Thanks for a quick reaction!
vorpalblade (2023-07-24 19:08:09+00:00): Hi there, I don't know if you are with the city government or not (your username indicates that), but there is better background imagery available.

To see the full background list, open the `Background Settings` menu (default keyboard shortcut `b`) and go through that.

Since you are _probably_ with the city government, you _probably_ want to use the `Mesa County GIS Valleywide 2022` background.

Moving on to what you've been mapping recently (bicycle lanes), many of those have already been mapped as part of the road infrastructure using `cycleway=lane`. You may be interested in reading https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle for the distinction between a cycle path and a cycle lane.

If you are wanting to model the position of the cycle lanes, you might want to use `width` tags. For example, with `North 3rd Street`, I would use `width=33'` (I use edge of gutter to edge of gutter, but most people will say kerb-kerb; I prefer to use lower values since that can matter sometimes). Here are the tags I would use (using meters as the unit, instead of feet/inches):
width:lanes:backward=3|1|2
width:lanes:forward=3|1
width=10

If you don't mind an editor with a larger learning curve, take a look at JOSM ( https://josm.openstreetmap.de ). It has many paintstyles that may help you, one of which is specifically for lane and road attributes.

Anyway, I'm glad to see someone from the city mapping as well. I did most of the footpaths in GJ downtown a few years ago.

As an aside, depending upon how accurate/precise you want to be, I _think_ you might want to look into setting the background offset (`Background Settings` -> `Imagery Offset`). The offset for the 2022 imagery (against one of the survey monuments, IIRC) was `0.40; -0.16`.

Thanks,
vorpalblade (Taylor)
GJCity (2023-07-25 15:20:56+00:00): Hi Vorpalblade,
Thanks for the info.  I am the Mobility Planner for the city but am new to OSM, so I appreciate your tips.  I have removed some of these cycle lanes based on the road designation.

Thanks also for your help mapping footpaths downtown!
Henry
Patchanka (2023-07-20 18:49:57+00:00): coucou
cette modif m'étonne un peu. Je ne retrouve pas cette recommandation dans le wiki. Peux-tu m'envoyer le lien ?
Il est vrai que le name="Mairie de xxx" fait débat mais je ne vois pas en quoi le remplacer d'office par "Hôtel de ville" serait mieux ?
Emmanuel Arrechea (2023-07-21 07:26:14+00:00): Salut,
On la trouve dans cette page : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dtownhall qui envoie ensuite vers le forum OSM fr. 

J'ai tenté de traiter toutes les mairies du Pays Basque de la même façon (résultat ici https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1xMu). 

Effectivement je propose "Hôtel de ville" en "name" qui permet ensuite une traduction facile en basque et en gascon puis mettre "Mairie de Bayonne" sur le tag "operator". 

J'ai fait une exception sur Ustaritz qui vient de regrouper ses deux mairies au Centre Lapurdi, ce nom semble être encore utilisé par les habitants.
Patchanka (2023-07-21 07:52:15+00:00): Je ne trouve pas où il est indiqué qu'on doit mettre name=Hotel de ville pour toutes les mairies. Le wiki dit même qu'il faut mettre name="Mairie de xx" bien que le forum le remette en cause.

La facilité de traduction ne me semble pas un bon critère, même si je comprends que ça soit "plus pratique". 

Quand je passe devant une mairie et qu'il est indiqué "Mairie de xx" sur le bâtiment, je mets ça comme name. Si c'est écrit "Hôtel de ville" je mets ça comme name. Il me semble que ce n'est pas la pire manière de faire. Et oui effectivement ce n'est pas homogène.

A noter également le défi Maproulette en cours pour ajouter les mairies manquantes en France, et qui propose de mettre name=Mairie de xx.

Du coup ça me semble une idée contestable de décider d'homogénéiser localement, qui plus est sans en discuter au préalable.

Par contre je suis tout à fait favorable à l'ajout du tag operator, qui permet de retrouver toutes les mairies, et peu importe leur nom.

a+
Emmanuel Arrechea (2023-07-21 08:15:52+00:00): dans les échanges du forum, j'aime bien écouter ce que raconte le père Quest et indique "« Mairie de XX » c’est descriptif… je ne renseigne pas name=* pour cela (j’ai même tendance à le supprimer)." et en lisant que que raconte 
LySioS qui mentionne que "Le wiki liste différentes appellations des mairies en France :
    Hôtel de ville
    Mairie
    mairie annexe
    mairie de quartier
    centre administratif"

et que j'ai rencontré beaucoup de bâtiments de mairies en Pays Basque intérieur avec la mention "Herriko etxea", c'est vrai que j'ai unilatéralement unifié le tag name avec ça et que je n'ai pas lancé de discussion sur le sujet avec la communauté locale (Mea Culpa).