piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
onterof (2026-02-19 15:14:24+00:00): Hallo,
die Wiki-Seite zu railway:preserved legt nahe, dass railway:preserved auch explizit für Draisinen gedacht ist und das vorherige taggin demzufolge einwandfrei war - draisine=yes könnte man natürlich noch hinzufügen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:railway:preserved
user_5359 (2025-10-28 08:07:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/12233738856 more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position. If you need help, you are welcome!
edisondotme (2025-10-27 01:18:35+00:00): I'm confused about inclines on stairs? Why is it up? I could just as easily walk down these stairs.
The wiki is also not very clear.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:incline=up?uselang=en
ion_chi (2025-10-27 01:36:22+00:00): The incline is about the change in elevation along the direction of the way. This way starts at a lower point at water level and ends at a higher level so the incline is up. 

The key-level documentation is better:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:incline
edisondotme (2025-10-27 01:49:17+00:00): Wow! Thank you, I think I get it now. If the way had been coded the other direction going from the grass down to the water, the change along the direction of the way would be down. Thank you for the clarification.
ion_chi (2025-10-27 01:57:52+00:00): Yes, exactly. No problem
cubbe8 (2026-01-20 03:58:38+00:00): This is for sure not a motorway
GTMistral (2025-11-01 23:59:24+00:00): Pourquoi avoir changé le nom de la Route 117 sur plus de 400km? Boulevard Tétrault est uniquement à Val-d'Or. https://toponymie.gouv.qc.ca/ct/ToposWeb/Fiche.aspx?no_seq=311776
PierZen (2025-11-02 18:29:19+00:00): Le nom Boulevard Tétrault n'a été ajouté que pour les sections de la route à Val-d'or et cela a remplacé le nom « Route Trans-Canadienne » qui était improprement utilisé. On le retrouve plutôt sur la clé nat_name. Ceux qui avaient ajouté ce nom voulaient indiquer que la 117 fait partie du réseau Trans-Canadien.  
Dans les autres section de la 117 j'ai indiqué « Route 117 » sauf les endroits où il y a un nom de rue, par exemple rue principale à Sainte-Agathe-des-Monts..
GTMistral (2025-11-02 21:31:14+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=173812803

Je te confirme que le nom "Boulevard Tétrault" s'est étendu plus loin que Val-d'Or. Grand Remous, Rivière-Rouge, La Conception, Mont Tremblant et Mont Blanc. Je te laisse modifier ou je m'en occupe?
PierZen (2025-11-02 22:50:38+00:00): Corrigé. S'il y en a d'oublié, ne pas hésiter à modifier.
GTMistral (2025-11-03 01:28:51+00:00): Perfect! On garde l'oeil ouvert!
Jrachi (2026-04-02 08:55:50+00:00): Ciao.
Hai forse fatto un piccolo pasticcio sulla relazione 360?
type=hiking non credo significhi qualcosa.
Ivo
micheleOSM3 (2026-04-02 12:44:24+00:00): ok
eggie (2025-10-27 07:50:27+00:00): Dag Nico..
Bedrijven svp bijtaggen op de adresnode en dan ook de aard van het bedrijf toevoegen. Bv office=company .
Mvg..
eggie
eggie (2025-10-27 08:49:27+00:00): Aangepast naar adresnode.. office=consulting

MVG
eggie
DMMeYourCurbCuts (2025-10-27 20:04:03+00:00): Hello!

I see that you've added sidewalk:[side] tagging to one or more sidewalks. I haven't seen that tagging scheme before; I've only seen it used on roadways to indicate that there's a sidewalk to the left or right of the road.

What are you trying to indicate with the sidewalk:* tag on the sidewalk itself?
Gregory Peony (2025-11-07 21:05:52+00:00): Hello, my intention is to improve your understanding. You appropriately disconnected the highway and building and some buildings have an accurate shape. However, beware that the Nothern walls are visible in the imagery you used. It should not be included in the size of footprints and they should be moved to the base of building to prevent data overlaps. Enter this url in to the custom imagery offset by 0,2.32 https://wayback.maptiles.arcgis.com/arcgis/rest/services/world_imagery/wmts/1.0.0/default028mm/mapserver/tile/20337/{zoom}/{y}/{x} I hope this helps.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173814560
alan_gr (2025-12-13 17:19:34+00:00): Hi, should Crumlin Outreach be "education=college" rather than "amenity=school", as suggested by the amenity tags?
alan_gr (2025-12-13 17:20:43+00:00): (I mean Youthreach, not Outreach)
VictorIE (2025-12-13 18:01:32+00:00): Fixed, thank you.

Now known as City of Dublin FET College Crumlin (Youthreach).
blm07 (2025-10-27 05:18:43+00:00): Bonjour, Il n'y a aucun intérêt à ajouter un tag addr:street si l'adresse à déjà une relation Associated Street. Différents sujets sur le forum expliquent les différentes manières de taguer les adresses.
Dawid2849 (2025-10-27 07:55:49+00:00): Dzięki
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-24 09:38:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445304211/history - leisure=park tu błędne jest, to zagroda zwierząt a nie osobny park
mmis-berg (2025-11-19 14:44:48+00:00): Signals are tagged as a point on the track (instead of the real location). Please check the wiki for further instructions. Then remove your signal, because it already exists on the track.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dsignal
Jrachi (2026-04-02 14:58:37+00:00): Hai inserito su una way dei tag che devono essere in una relazione.
Forse non sai come creare una relazione?
Fai anche un uso improprio dei tag access e name

Ivo
Lord-O (2026-04-02 23:48:35+00:00): a cosa ti riferisci? posto che i sentieri già erano tracciati io li ho corretti e arricchiti
Jrachi (2026-04-03 06:00:10+00:00): Ripeto la domanda:
Sai cos'è una relazione in OSM?
Aggiungere il tag:
route=hiking non trasforma una way in relation, è un errore.
Hai messo i tag:
access=no che significa che possono passare solo i mezzi d'emergenza
foot=yes significa che a piedi si può passare, ma se è un sentiero è già una strada dove puoi passare solo a piedi.
Hai messo anche un bicycle=no, e mi fa pensare che ci siano cartelli con il divieto specifico di transito alle biciclette. Ma se hai aggiunto il tag perché secondo te è meglio non fare quel sentiero in bici/mtb, è un errore
Hai letto le pagine che descrivono i tag da usare sui sentieri:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway=path?uselang=it
E le relazioni:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route=hiking?uselang=it
Ivo
gallseife (2025-10-27 10:56:09+00:00): Hi,
das neue Stellwerk ist elektronisch. Elektromechanische Stellwerke werden seit 50 Jahren nicht mehr gebaut :)
Alliegaytor (2025-10-27 06:30:23+00:00): Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM.

In this changeset you added some building nodes to the SRL (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1003899336/history/27). I've since disconnected them in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173822264

Please refrain from connecting building nodes to the underground railway construction ways as they are not connected in any way.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-27 01:11:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13260590012
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/201158041

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
aharvey (2025-10-27 22:35:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/758025663 is not representing the lot boundary, it's representing the trees, the south east corner looks like grass only so shouldn't be included unless it's been reforested.
arjunaraoc (2025-12-19 00:45:47+00:00): Hello nagatha,

Can you map  Aspari 1 and Aspari 2 grama sachivalayams to the points you added  ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13260623357
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13260623356  )
b-jazz (2025-10-28 03:33:47+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445319095

When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. Take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Golf.png for an example of the "Wrong" way to map a fairway and a green along with the right way. There are some cases where a fringe exists around a green and you should draw the fairway outline completely around a green, leaving room for the fringe. Other times, the fairway and green butt up against each other. In that case the fairway and green should share the same nodes at the boundary between the two, and every node at the boundary needs to be shared leaving no gaps. When drawing these shared nodes, editors like iD (built into openstreetmap.org) will "snap" to an existing node if you get close enough. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out. Thanks.
seateaeye (2025-10-29 13:44:55+00:00): I think I just wasn't careful while editing, thanks for noticing this and correcting it.
Glassman (2025-10-27 16:58:22+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173817909
Glassman (2025-10-27 16:59:04+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173817909
Glassman (2025-10-27 16:59:10+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173817909
Johnny Carlsen (2025-10-29 08:04:30+00:00): Hi Kyaw,

Lots of great buildings, but what is the source?
Kyaw Gyi 992 (2025-10-29 09:33:27+00:00): google open buildings.
Johnny Carlsen (2025-10-29 09:45:23+00:00): Perfect. I'd recommend including it in the changeset descriptions or possibly in a source tag.

It seems a lot of the buildings are missing the actual building tag, is that by design?
mueschel (2025-10-29 11:16:38+00:00): Something went very wrong with this import - all the objects don't have valid tags, they are overlapping with existing buildings and roads.

I recommend reverting this edit, and starting fresh after reading our import guidelines:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Kyaw Gyi 992 (2025-10-29 15:00:01+00:00):  Hello Johnny, Thanks for your recommendation and I will follow your suggestion for the next edit. Thanks.
Kyaw Gyi 992 (2025-10-29 15:02:19+00:00): Hello mueschel, I will restart and can you explain about the "valid tags". Thank you for your care.
mueschel (2025-10-30 20:07:13+00:00): A building needs to have a tag describing it is a building.

There shouldn't be any tags like "are_in_me" or coordinates like in your changeset.
I also noticed that the alignment of buildings is very bad - buildings overlap in many places which clearly can't be right.

I reverted this upload for now, please start with documenting the planned import according to the Import Guidelines.
julcnx (2025-11-01 05:43:37+00:00): Thanks a lot for your contributions! Just a friendly tip: try to keep your changes smaller, like focusing on one country at a time. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Ruslan Fatih (2025-11-01 07:06:11+00:00): Ok! No problem!
SomeoneElse (2025-11-30 19:37:08+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!,

On this changeset you've used a "source=Google Maps" tag. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source.
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK. If not, we'll have to undo this change.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
Sammyhawkrad (2025-10-27 07:49:30+00:00): Hello Banibatiti, you have created duplicates of this office at different locations. Which is the right one?
user_5359 (2025-10-28 07:59:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:lanes. I will delete your change.
SomeoneElse (2025-10-30 11:32:31+00:00): Hello Ediats,
Someone has deleted the things that you added here because they say that they did not exist.
They did that before, after they asked you about it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163509587 , but you did not reply.
Best Regards,
Andy
Lumikeiju (2026-02-15 20:19:04+00:00): Hi! Please note, street names should be unabbreviated ("Smoky Ridge Road" not "Smoky Ridge Rd") and state names should be capitalized ("WA" not "Wa") - I've fixed these in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178598308.

Thanks for your contributions, and happy mapping!
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:25:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822176
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:24:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822173
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:24:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822170
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisBot (2025-10-27 06:07:18+00:00): Hola hefyomudro, bienvenido al proyecto OSM y gracias por tu contribución. 
Para hacer que la colaboración sea más fácil y ayudar a los demás a entender tus ediciones, es mejor agregar una breve descripción de los cambios que hiciste. Los comentarios claros ayudan a la comunidad a seguir tu trabajo y a proporcionar una retroalimentación mejor. Puedes encontrar consejos para escribir buenos comentarios aquí[1].
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi hefyomudro, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-10-27 06:07:27+00:00): Basado en tus ediciones de mapa en este conjunto de cambios, he redactado una sugerencia sobre cómo podría parecerse un comentario: "Actualizadas los nombres de las calles, eliminadas las variantes lingüísticas"
(Auto-translation)
---
Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Updated street names, removed language variants"
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:24:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822164
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:24:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822158
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:24:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822154
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:23:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822151
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:23:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822146
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:23:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822138
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:23:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822134
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
GrabTH_Tanyaporn (2025-10-28 06:32:03+00:00): Hi Kri_ttt, I have found that you've reverted the tag for `motorcycle` tag. May I know the source of this tag? I have not found any traffic sign that is preventing motorcycle access for this bridge (https://organizations.kartaview.org/details/34044512/1943/track-info ). Please let me know if you have any other information that I missed. Happy Mapping!
Kri_ttt (2025-10-28 11:07:24+00:00): Thank you for bringing this up. I initially misunderstood the layout and thought the lower road allowed straight-through access. After reviewing it again, I realize that was an error on my part, and I’ve now corrected the tag accordingly. I appreciate you pointing that out.
Best regards,
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:23:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822128
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:22:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822121
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:22:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822116
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:22:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822113
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-27 06:20:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13260855443

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:22:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822106
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:21:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822104
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:21:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822100
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:21:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822094
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:21:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822089
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:20:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822072
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:20:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822068
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:20:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822054
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
eggie (2025-10-27 09:00:00+00:00): Dag Carla. Je vraagt feedback. Over de Markt ontbreekt de route highway=pedestrian.. 
Ik wil dat niet aanpassen, want ik weet niet of een passage mogelijk is.
Aan de zuidzijde naar de Julianastraat staat eenrichting aangegeven en ontbreekt ook emergency=yes
en oneway:emergency=no


Nee .. dat gaat niet routeren zo.

Dit stuk stationsstraat is dus een 'eilandje' in de routering. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-27 09:14:28+00:00): Ik heb wel een route gemaakt over de markt. Of deze route geschikt is voor hulpdiensten is up to you. emergency=yes ontbreekt dus nog.
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:20:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822060
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:26:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822201
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:25:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822191
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:25:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822187
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:25:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822182
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:26:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822210
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:26:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822215
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:27:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822233
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:27:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822239
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:28:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822260
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:28:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822274
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:28:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822288
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:29:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822301
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:29:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822310
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:29:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822317
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:32:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822390
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-27 06:33:31+00:00): Consulte https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dudas-varias-sobre-la-toponimia-en-las-regiones-de-espana-y-dibujo-del-mapa/121272/79
---
Please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dudas-varias-sobre-la-toponimia-en-las-regiones-de-espana-y-dibujo-del-mapa/121272/79
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-27 06:33:49+00:00): Consulte https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dudas-varias-sobre-la-toponimia-en-las-regiones-de-espana-y-dibujo-del-mapa/121272/79
---
Please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dudas-varias-sobre-la-toponimia-en-las-regiones-de-espana-y-dibujo-del-mapa/121272/79
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:34:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822453
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-27 06:33:52+00:00): Consulte https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dudas-varias-sobre-la-toponimia-en-las-regiones-de-espana-y-dibujo-del-mapa/121272/79
---
Please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dudas-varias-sobre-la-toponimia-en-las-regiones-de-espana-y-dibujo-del-mapa/121272/79
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:34:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822449
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-27 06:33:56+00:00): Consulte https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dudas-varias-sobre-la-toponimia-en-las-regiones-de-espana-y-dibujo-del-mapa/121272/79
---
Please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dudas-varias-sobre-la-toponimia-en-las-regiones-de-espana-y-dibujo-del-mapa/121272/79
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:34:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822441
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:35:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822466
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-10-27 06:34:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173822461
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism