piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
wille (2023-03-20 22:32:11+00:00): Por favor, contate a comunidade antes de fazer mudanças em massa de classificação de vias. A classificação de muitas dessas vias foram debatidas por mapeadores e seguem critérios técnicos.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133853931
volredman (2023-03-21 02:18:20+00:00): Desculpe pela minha ignorância no mundo do OpenStreetMaps, mais preciso entender as regras! Trabalho na Superintendência de Trânsito de Salvador onde ruas residenciais não são consideradas estradas primarias, secundárias ou terciárias! Onde posso ver essas regras de classificação? Preciso estudar os critérios técnicos do Data Working Group (OTRS) para poder não cometer outros erros!
volredman (2023-03-21 02:19:36+00:00): Pode me fornecer o contato da comunidade ?
wille (2023-03-21 10:17:58+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/Classifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_rodovias_do_Brasil

Contato da comunidade: https://www.openstreetmap.org.br/comunidade/
NieWnen (2023-03-20 10:30:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4413510554
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10744974828
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10744974830


Ponownie niepołączony landuse tworzący duplikaty węzłów.
Poprawiłem.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:21:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
eggie (2026-03-30 12:10:59+00:00): Dag Flakkeeenaar. Bij de aansluiting Damweg zet je de fiets en wandelroutes op slot met use_sidepath.

Dan zul je eerst de routes moeten omleggen. Mocht je die skills niet hebben dan graag hulp vragen via het forum.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-30 12:15:22+00:00): blokkakades verwijderd.
shared_lane toegevoegd
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-19 13:34:59+00:00): Edycja wycofana za import z brakiem podanego źródła i prawdopodobny brak przejrzenia

patrz też https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133854961
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-20 19:06:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133911345 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert on user request (Ticket#2023032010000145)
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-19 13:38:27+00:00): Edycja wycofana za import z brakiem podanego źródła i prawdopodobny brak przejrzenia patrz też https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133854961
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-19 13:33:46+00:00): Edycja wycofana za import z brakiem podanego źródła i prawdopodobny brak przejrzenia
eggie (2023-03-19 12:34:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback...  De operator Keolis hoort eigenlijk niet op de bushalte maar op de routerelatie. 
Ik zie hier operator Syntus op de busroutes.. Is hier iets veranderd?

Bus routes inleggen en/of aanpassen  kan niet goed met editor iD De routerelaties gaan dan stuk. Vraag in dat geval hulp aan het forum van OSM. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-03-19 12:35:37+00:00): operator verwijderd
Leo Slager (2023-03-19 14:00:13+00:00): Ter info:
Keolis is een overkoepelende maatschappij.
Daar maken deel van uit:
Twents, Syntus Utrecht, AllGo, en diverse treindiensten.
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:16:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
eggie (2023-03-19 12:38:30+00:00): Beter niets aan busroutes veranderen met editor iD. Dat kan alleen met editor josm.
Je bushaltes komen anders op de verkeerde plaats in de relatie terecht.
MVG
eggie
Leo Slager (2023-03-19 13:55:56+00:00): Beste Daanoontje,
Dank voor het op de kaart zetten van de nieuwe haltes.
De routerelatie bewerken met de editor iD gaat helaas altijd fout.
De nieuwe bushaltes staan nu achteraan in de routerelatie.
Ik pas het even aan.
Verder is de role in de relatie fout ingevuld. Wat je nu op de kaart hebt gezet krijgt de role=platform.

Sommige mappers zetten ook nog de stop_position op de kaart. Die hoort op de highway te staan en is dan de plek op de weg waar de bus stopt. Deze node krijgt in de routerelatie dan de role=stop.
Als je serieus met routerelaties aan de slag wilt dan adviseer ik je om over te stappen naar de editor JOSM:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710

Succes met verder mappen.
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:16:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-19 13:29:34+00:00): Czy dyskuowałeś z społecznością automatyczny import adresów bez pełnej ręcznej weryfikacji?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-19 13:32:30+00:00): Ta edycja jest wycofana, zastanawiam się nad wycofaniem innych gdzie brak przejrzenia jest mniej ewidentny.
woodpeck (2023-03-22 13:37:06+00:00): Dear jslawin2, please confirm that you have read these messages and that you will refrain from further undiscussed imports.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-23 12:24:21+00:00): jak to był import budynków bez weryfikacji - też wymaga konsultacji ze społecznością
cyton (2023-03-19 15:04:57+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM!
Ich werde noch craft=tiler hinzufügen.
Gibt es eine Website? Eine Telefonnummer? Eine E-Mailadresse? Dann diese bitte mittels dem contact:* Schema hinzufügen, also contact:website=* oder contact:email=*, contact:phone, contact:fax, contact:mobile.
Ob die description als Werbung gilt oder nicht, sei dahingestellt, sollte jedenfalls nicht so sein.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133854974
MyTiler (2023-03-19 15:18:25+00:00): Danke :-) geändert
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-02 10:27:16+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10745004740/history has fixme:type = school that was added in this edit
Would it be amenity=school ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool )
Something else?
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:16:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
syntex (2023-04-08 10:33:30+00:00): "highway"="road"? to nie jest zbyt poprawne
Cardiff_Electric (2023-04-09 20:46:33+00:00): Cześć. Format zmiany nie był wprowadzony przeze mnie. Użyłem nawigacji StreetComplete jak przemykałem obok.
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:16:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
Sonic_ua (2023-03-20 12:43:14+00:00): Правильно писати УкраЇна а не украІна...
neviksasha (2023-03-20 19:34:13+00:00): Не розумію до якого саме об'єкта ваш коментар.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-03-30 14:53:11+00:00): مرحبا بك في خريطة الشارع المفتوحة، ونرجوا منكم عدم إجراء تغييرات غير صحيحة
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:18:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
literan (2023-03-19 18:18:00+00:00): это не названия, а тип объектов. Нужны названия, имена собственные
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:16:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
map per (2023-03-20 18:34:28+00:00): Wegen "Meine Änderungen überprüfen": Das meiste in diesem Changeset sieht gut aus, danke!

Bei diesem Weg (1) hast du aber oneway=yes gelöscht und building=yes hinzugefügt, das bitte wieder rückgängig machen.

Danke und viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/94741644
MunichWays (2023-03-24 15:41:20+00:00): Danke, Fehler korrigiert und oneway=yes wieder eingetragen.
Ich hoffe das war der richtige Abschnitt, denn building=yes war schon entfernt.
map per (2023-03-25 13:50:47+00:00): Danke, war der richtige Abschnitt
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
user_5359 (2023-03-20 10:39:47+00:00): Hello! A street cabinet doesn‘t have an address. Please use is_in.
Beager (2023-03-20 18:49:46+00:00): Hi, this is separately titled reserved land per VicMap (available data source), you may notice it's a different address from the park.
https://imgur.com/a/aI2SKLn

I can see the rationale behind it, but the Wiki generally leans against the use of this tag these days.
TheSwavu (2023-03-20 19:35:04+00:00): is_in? It'll get deleted the first time someone runs the JOSM validator.
user_5359 (2023-03-20 20:20:48+00:00): If that were actually deleted, it would be a mistake. Is_in is no longer appropriate for border areas, since almost all borders are now set, but not for is_in:street. But an address is just as wrong, because no mail is sent to a power box.
TheSwavu (2023-03-20 21:21:46+00:00): I think there is a misunderstanding about what a street address is in Australia/NZ. They are physical locations not *postal* addresses. So there are addresses for locating  assets such as ATMs, tree plantations, reserves and substations.

In this case it means you can dispatch the fire brigade to 12A and that is a specific thing.
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:16:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:16:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
tomzyl (2023-03-19 14:28:28+00:00): Jak się coś mapuje należy używać aktualnych podkładów orto, a nie usuwać poprawnie naniesione „z niezrozumiałych przyczyn”.
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:16:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:16:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
sjakobi (2023-05-23 09:40:44+00:00): Hi! Du hast hier den unüblichen Tag smoothness=very_good verwendet. Meintest du vielleicht smoothness=excellent oder smoothness=very_bad?
phriedrich (2023-05-23 09:47:44+00:00): "Excellent" geht sicher auch. Aber es hat mir zwischen "good" und "excellent" eben noch "very_good" angeboten und ich fand das nicht unpassend.
aceman444 (2024-08-16 16:04:37+00:00): So if you are adding motor_vehicle=permit tags, which authority gives out those permits and who can get them? Also, some of the streets have a traffic sign of vehicle=no, not just motor_vehicle, so I am really interested in your sources, as you constantly lie that they are dgu.hr, but you can't see traffic signs there.
Badojo (2024-08-16 16:16:19+00:00): As I've said before, if the changes are not recent I don't remember them. When I've been to Zadar I noted random signs and approximated their meaning and further expanded if there is Mapillary imagery. Also I've never said I've used dgu for street imagery or signs, that is for street names. If there are mistakes feel free to correct them.
aceman444 (2024-08-16 16:27:36+00:00): Then it is your editor that stored dgu.hr in your changeset. If you used something else (like you surveyed there), you have to write it into the changeset so others can check.

Also, "approximating" traffic signs isn't the greatest, if you do not understand their meaning in Croatian law (nether do I). Like today the streets are signed differently as some parking zones with extensive descriptions on the sign that I rather do not try to interpret :)
Badojo (2024-08-16 16:38:40+00:00): The vehicle tag I completely forgot about because ID automatically has motor vehicle section and I was lazy to type it manually :l

(Also parking situation is really weird depending on the city. I think the easiest is to tag it as payed parking and add the operator if it's a city for example. Parking in Zagreb for example is pretty well tagged.)
aceman444 (2024-08-16 21:51:07+00:00): Thank you. Yes, fee=yes, would be a safe starting point :) But I do not go into mapping the parking zones. I just updated a few streets I have visited.

iD editor isn't the best for experienced mappers like you and also it contains known misleading tags (like the questionable 'permit' value) and also pushes its own invented tags.
VA00 (2023-03-23 18:51:15+00:00): Odnowione!?!? Wykarczowane do gołej ziemi.
YomanNH (2024-06-11 08:41:41+00:00): Usunąłem nazwę opisową.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-24 04:21:01+00:00): Streetview247, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6988. Graeme Fitzpatrick, Arbeitsgruppe OSMF-Daten

Streetview247, please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6988. Graeme Fitzpatrick, OSMF Data Working Group
YomanNH (2024-06-11 08:39:51+00:00): Usunąłem nazwę opisową.
limes11 (2023-03-19 19:58:15+00:00): Hi, 

authentification:disc=yes

heißt Parkscheibe?

Parkscheibe und fee=yes, ergibt das Sinn?

VG
1998alexkane (2023-03-20 00:08:41+00:00): fee=yes ist jetzt entfernt. Und ja, das heißt Parkscheibe (dieses Taggingschema habe ich hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking#Time_limits gefunden.

LG,
Alex
limes11 (2023-03-20 00:20:21+00:00): Ah okay, danke. Hatte nur auf der Wiki-Seite von amenity=parking geschaut und dort nichts gefunden. 

Wird nicht viel verwendet das Schema, schade eigentlich.

VG
fabiotofy (2023-03-20 13:56:27+00:00): yes but by all means (bicycles? pedestrians?)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133859044
aikipooh (2023-03-20 14:21:28+00:00): Oh, cannot say for sure. We were in a car, and it's not impassable, it's a section of a fence barring half road, so a car can pass too. I've read the paper, but cannot say now whether it was banned for everyone or for motorised traffic only, sorry:(
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-19 14:00:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15618556

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
habi (2023-05-30 09:28:12+00:00): Ciao vmicho

I passed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155425895/ by chance.

Mapping a communal grave [1] with `barrier=retaining_wall` and `leisure=garden` seems wrong, and - in my opinion - tagging for the renderer.

According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Friedhofmapping (unfortunately only in German), I've updated it to `historic=tomb` and `tomb=columbarium`.

Happy mapping,
habi 

[1]: Here's a link to a photo of mine, valid for some days: https://share.icloud.com/photos/07bWjQU6yQNZXmYl4Kuj9oigg
vmicho (2023-06-03 09:42:30+00:00): hi, no problem, it just was not on map so i added something at least ;)
Konkon153 (2023-03-19 14:11:42+00:00): [ und damit alle 241 aktuell vorhandenen Adressen in der Gemeinde Lüblow vollständig angepasst ]
gnlpfth (2023-07-14 08:47:19+00:00): Hi,

are you aware that 1. natural=saddle is located at the actual saddle point, that doesn't have to be on a road 2. mountain_pass=yes is to be distinguished from natural=saddle, being located at the highest point of a road? See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dsaddle

I thought I'd let you know since you did a huge amount of changes like that. I can only rate this one in particular yet, your changes were not correct on this one.

Greets
rumbrummer (2023-07-15 14:40:52+00:00): Hi, 

thanks for the hint, but yes, I am aware of that (and was also before ;-) ):

As you can see in history https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10221246496/history, in this case the old pass position was 20m away from saddle position.
Furthermore the saddle position was on the road - so I unified them to one node. The position of the unified node is the position of the old saddle node (deleted).

If you open the node in edit mode and use the OpenTopoMap, you can see the old pass position - it is 20m away from the road (can not paste screenshot here) - if you shift it to the road, you reach the saddle position.

So I do not understand why this change (shift pass onto road, unify it with saddle node) should be wrong - every hint mentioned above says that pass and saddle are at same position.

I unified several pass/saddle pairs which had a very low distance to a single node - it is not useful to have separate pass and saddle close together, because that causes poor readability in some OSM maps.

If I did a mistake and unified a pair, which was not close together, please give a feedback, I will revert it.

Regards
gnlpfth (2023-07-15 15:46:33+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for answering. Good to know that you know the rules. I was afraid you would distribute wrong tagging all over the world unknowingly, but you are apperently not ;)

About Mendlingpass: Moving the saddle point to a road - not really necessary, but why not. I use a different topographic map and results may vary. But you missed that the highest point of the road is somewhere else, including a mountain_pass=yes-node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/59639025. You just duplicated this one in the wrong position. 

I hope everything is clear now.

Greets
rumbrummer (2023-07-15 16:19:36+00:00): Ah - got it: In the past there have been 3 nodes: The saddle 10221246496 (20m besides the road), a pass 10598911072 20m away from that saddle (in the road) and an other pass ~200m away in the road (I did not see it).
I unified the two nodes which were close together. So, as far as I understand, I should move the modified node to the old position of 10221246496 (and remove node from road) and remove the mountain_pass tag, because real pass is ~200m north, right?
I would appreciate if you could confirm (I want to avoid further chaos :-) ).
gnlpfth (2023-07-15 16:41:16+00:00): Removing mountain_pass=yes from the node you melted should do already
rumbrummer (2023-07-15 16:54:11+00:00): Thanks for feedback - done!
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-22 01:59:57+00:00): What does "vt" mean in your changeset comment?
GUFSZ (2023-03-19 14:52:36+00:00): Ich war etwas verdutzt als ich das Ende abgefahren bin, weil ich mir einbilde es gab vor einigen Jahren grundsätzlich Fahrradwegweisungen auf der Strecke, dieses Mal nicht. Deswegen habe ich die gelöschten Wege in der Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15618747 geparkt
itineris (2023-09-21 06:42:04+00:00): Régi és új utcanév-táblán, házszám táblán is "i" nélkül szerepel. A hivatalos neve is így van. Indokolja bármi is, hogy az OSM-en az "i"-s változatot preferáljuk?
vasony (2023-09-21 07:30:48+00:00): nem indokolja, írd ahogy van, én csak egyformára raktam, de ha a másik jó, akkor cseréld le
emersonveenstra (2023-03-19 17:06:18+00:00): Thanks a lot for the contribution! It looks great, the only small thing is that the state abbreviation needs to be capitalized, not lowercase. Other than that, great job!
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-20 19:06:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133911345 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert on user request (Ticket#2023032010000145)
Trevor_1 (2023-04-02 17:18:16+00:00): Hello. Why did you change this segment of AR 8 to a service road? State highways are usually tertiary or secondary. I changed it back. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12755933
threeof4 (2023-04-03 09:12:49+00:00): I think I changed it in error. Thanks for keeping an eye out and fixing it.
Trevor_1 (2023-04-07 22:19:54+00:00): Ok, no problem!
antonr (2023-03-21 21:54:28+00:00): Hej

Uheld at Post Poultry blev slettet? Jeg er næsten sikker på at jeg så den stadig var der den anden dag...

Mvh
Lostmonkey (2023-03-21 22:19:05+00:00): Må indrømme at jeg nu ikke husker om jeg ikke kunne se PostPoultry eller blot har fået slettet den ved en fejl. Hvis du så den forleden, findes den jo nok stadig. Opretter den igen.
antonr (2023-03-21 22:39:25+00:00): 👍 Deres facebook var aktiv for 10h siden: https://www.facebook.com/PostPoultrySilkeborg/
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-19 15:00:20+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8416107804
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391390044

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
EllieNyaa (2023-09-11 00:14:10+00:00): Hello, what is the reasoning for this edit? "Super two" roads, like the CTP is here, are usually tagged as trunks.
Miner The Miner (2023-09-11 01:00:40+00:00): I tagged it as a motorway as it is limited access and it has a barrier between the two directions. If this is wrong feel free to fix it.
EllieNyaa (2023-09-11 02:57:35+00:00): Yeah, motorway is usually reserved for a controlled-access road with at least two lanes in each direction (so vehicles can easily pass).
mavl (2023-03-24 10:30:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 134051515, 134045911, 134058112 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6981].
bkil (2023-03-20 00:02:15+00:00): Köszönjük a kiegészítést, raktam rá ennek megfelelően további címkéket https://osm.org/changeset/133877732#map=16/47.6604/18.8618
Miguel79er (2023-03-19 16:28:26+00:00): Hi, how can i delete this added new location? can i delete this one aince it was saved in a wrong side of a road.

and it feels uncomfortable using the Maps.Me App it become too slow nowadays. 😔