piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nevw (2023-10-29 23:32:17+00:00): In general Osm is a self help site.
You will need to add a node at the new address and add in all the tags for the business.
There is an address node already at the new site. You should add a new node next to it or in the centre of the building you operate from and add the business tags to it. If you occupy the whole building you may prefer instead to draw the building outline and add the tag building=yes and all you other tags to it as well.
This site may help you ...
https://www.onosm.org/
The history of the tags at the old site are here to assist...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6068611950/history
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-29 01:10:39+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15300
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-16 03:35:04+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1223998671
TomPar (2023-11-18 21:43:51+00:00): There is a trail here.  I just walked it today.  There are even built steps down to it from Pine St.
https://i.postimg.cc/50kRtPFs/IMG-8720.jpg
kubahahaha (2023-10-25 22:10:48+00:00): To chyba nie jest przejście, a na pewno nie zebra (90 stopni w inną stronę)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11287471019
Matt_ (2023-10-25 01:29:07+00:00): TX03823;TX00989;TX04263;TX01544;TX03682;TX02751;TX02488;TX00994;TX04455
❤️‍🔥 (2023-10-25 06:56:44+00:00): Hi, what is your source for this edit? This street-level imagery from 2019 shows that the speed limit is 60 through the junction: https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=3acff657-5de0-4c96-a467-8d09ac863908&cp=-37.196688%7E175.552607&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027&pi=-2.2&style=x&dir=168.6 

Has the speed limit recently been raised from 60 to 100?
Niiepce (2023-10-25 02:04:59+00:00): siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143057034
Rainero (2023-11-02 22:02:25+00:00): Hallo Niiepce, 

es gibt diese Relation "Wettersteingebiet einschließlich Latschengürtel bei Mittenwald" nun doppelt samt der Linien. Duplikat: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16552319

Eine davon sollte weg.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
GeoAndi (2025-03-15 11:03:53+00:00): Hallo,

ich hab heute zufällig gesehen, dass die Relation immer noch doppelt vorhanden ist. Möchte sich denn keiner drum kümmern?

Viele Grüße, GeoAndi
Rainero (2025-03-15 15:10:06+00:00): Hallo Andi,

danke für die Erinnerung. Ich hatte auf Antwort gehofft und es dann aus den Augen verloren.
Ich kümmere mich heute Abend darum.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
GeoAndi (2025-03-15 22:36:36+00:00): Danke.
Rainero (2025-03-15 23:06:57+00:00): Ist nun erledigt.
GeoAndi (2025-03-16 06:59:24+00:00): Perfekt 👍
emersonveenstra (2023-10-25 12:39:12+00:00): Hi there,

A couple of your objects seem to have messed up surface tags, i assume they're meant to be "ground" but figured i would double check with you:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1218153799
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1218153798
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1218153797

Thanks!
Dave Nadolsky (2023-10-27 13:46:36+00:00): Good catch. Copy/paste error, I'm sure. Addressed via new changeset this morning.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-24 02:26:13+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11287530437/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Javierpf (2023-10-26 11:59:02+00:00): Hello! Thank you for the updates. It seems your changeset crosses many continents/countries. Please retain your changeset smaller. Let reviewers and other mappers check your edit more easily. It's impossible (almost) to keep track of the database and changes if changes in huge areas.
So I kindly ask you when you edit, retain your changeset in a particular smaller area -such as countries/provinces/municipality- save it first and then move to another area. Examples:
you are adding/modifying 10 objects in 2 distant cities => make 2 changesets, 1 per city.
you are adding/modifying 5 objects in 5 countries => make 5 changesets, 1 per country.
You'll find more information on the reason in this article: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Udarian (2023-10-27 02:47:32+00:00): yes, please follow the changeset comment guidelines and keep the geographic area smaller, it can be really hard to tell what areas really large changesets like this effect so that they can be verified.
Dren ar Frankig (2023-11-08 00:08:01+00:00): I modified only one relation that spans many continents
zstadler (2023-10-25 09:34:45+00:00): I believe this changeset is corrupt.
It moved the marina and the breakwater westward, into the sea.

It can be seen in in the editor
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&#map=16/32.1625/34.7935

I suggest there will more repairs in parallel with the repair bot launched by SomeoneElse_Revert
zstadler (2023-10-25 09:42:25+00:00): My suggestion is also to delay the repair of this changeset.
SomeoneElse (2023-10-25 09:55:19+00:00): @zstadler can you link to actual objects that have been reverted to incorrect values?
zstadler (2023-10-25 10:23:41+00:00): For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1033293880/history
was at location 32.1601065, 34.7915587 prior to the vandalism (version 3).

It is in location  32.1611790, 34.7846907 after this changeset (version 12).

I also do not understand why would there be new (version 1) nodes in a revert.
zstadler (2023-10-25 10:43:20+00:00): Another example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26508703/history had 13 nodes prior to the vandalism (version 8).

It has 12 nodes after this changeset (version 13).
SomeoneElse (2023-10-25 12:17:14+00:00): @zstadler The 13 nodes to 12 is as a result of a manual tidying exercise (this changeset).  What is incorrect about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26508703/history now?
zstadler (2023-10-25 12:26:28+00:00): IMHO, reverts should be separated from edits so we could compare their outcome with the expected pre-vandalism state of the map.

@SomeoneElse, Do you mean that this changeset is not a DWG revert!?
SomeoneElse (2023-10-25 12:44:04+00:00): No, this changeset _is_ by someone from the DWG trying to manually repair the data.
zstadler (2023-10-25 12:57:36+00:00): What should be done with this changeset?
SomeoneElse (2023-10-25 13:08:42+00:00): With this changeset right now, nothing.  When we come to review the objects that were initially deleted and edited we (or the community) will need to do that on an object by object basis, not a changeset by changeset one.
SomeoneElse (2023-10-31 20:31:45+00:00): (for the benefit of anyone stumbling on this changeset) further discussion is at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vandalism-and-blocks-in-israel/105176 .
sahilister (2023-10-26 08:06:35+00:00): Hi syedk,
Great to see your work and thanks for making OpenStreetMaps data better with actual ground truth correction. A minor suggestion around making changes in smaller areas at once. For example, in this changeset, the bbox is pan India which makes checking what changed while also polluting edit history for others.

Hope you'll understand. Feel free to drop by in OSM India telegram group at https://t.me/OSMIndia for any clarification.

Cheers!
sahilister
syedk (2023-10-26 09:06:10+00:00): Hi Sahil,
Thanks for your suggestion. As far as I know, the Bbox is created on its own. In this changeset, I have just removed the connectivity at this 31.27826601532656, 75.68151948465017 location and submitted it. We are making sure to edit smaller areas at once, so we're not sure how the box got created on a bigger area.
zstadler (2023-10-25 04:48:05+00:00): Please note that the remaining path is not connected at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10963975537
zstadler (2023-10-25 04:46:22+00:00): Please note that the remaining road is not connected at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10862080130
user_5359 (2023-10-28 11:13:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on the tag payment:4511001,_4520914 = yes. I assume a copy & paste error from the phone numbers.
moje_konto (2023-10-25 06:52:37+00:00): https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/1116270

Removed tag:
boundary=administrative

?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-25 14:17:20+00:00): reverted, in such obvious cases of test edits it can be reverted immediately
map per (2023-10-25 13:09:52+00:00): As mentioned before: Don't add the seame hotel twice. This Hilton hotel has been in the OpenStreetMaps database for 10 years.
map per (2023-10-25 13:21:33+00:00): I think updating existing Hotels is not possible with Maps.me any more, so I would suggest to use the OrganicMaps app (1) instead (it's a spin off of Maps.me)

(1) https://organicmaps.app/
[at]AJYTO (2023-10-30 11:12:23+00:00): Hello, you replace highway type for Gang Pemandangan from Living Street to Residential. Can cite your source or reason?
UmniatiRiver (2023-10-31 07:26:13+00:00): Hi [at]AJYTO, thanks for reaching out! Based on aerial imagery, Gang Pemandangan appeared to be larger in width and hold higher traffic than surrounding living streets. I am happy to defer to your knowledge and leave this road as a living street. Happy mapping!
Maloss34 (2023-11-20 17:51:57+00:00): ho visto che hai modificato da city a town sull'etichetta place. Evidentemente hai considerato solo il numero di abitanti che NON è l'unico elemento da prendere in considerazione per classificare la città. Questo in base alle istruzioni le quali avvertono che "Per centro abitato si intende quell'insediamento di norma delimitato dai comuni con segnali bianchi di inizio: a seconda della popolazione e dell'importanza si distinguono hamlet, village, town e city.

Le località all'interno dei centri abitati si distinguono, a seconda della loro importanza, in neighbourhood e suburb.

Il numero di abitanti è solo un valore INDICATIVO: in caso di valori di popolazione prossimi alle soglie prevale l'importanza dell'abitato in relazione al contesto geografico." Ovvero la valutazione deve tener presente valori qualitativi (storico - culturali - economici - politici ecc.) sull'importanza della città indipendentemente dal mero valore Quantitativo  (abitanti) di per se abbastanza riduttivo e forviante. Quindi ti chiedo di riportare il valore corretto di "city" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:place   grazie della collaborazione ... p.s. ci sono atre città identificate cosi vedi chieti
ivanbranco (2023-11-21 08:42:17+00:00): Ciao Maloss34, Fizzie41 ha semplicemente revertato le modifiche di un utente pluri-bloccato (quando leggi "DWG" vuol dire "Data Working Group", il gruppo che tra le altre cose gestisce le accuse di vandalismo con blocchi e/o revert). Dal momento che non é sempre possibile verificare una per una tutte le modifiche di un vandalo, solitamente vengono revertate tutte (giuste o sbagliate). Se tu hai conoscenza locale del posto procedi pure direttamente alla modifica, non sarà un problema.

Buon mapping :)
Maloss34 (2023-11-21 11:34:18+00:00): OK grazie procedo. Colgo l'occasione per informarvi che è in programma  un azione volta all'identificazione di molti  dei sentieri del Comune di Ascoli Piceno (strade forestali, sentieri ecc.) nell'ambito del progetto ATA Ascoli Trail Area patrocinato dal Comune di Ascoli Piceno ed altri con fondi Regionali/Europei. Tracciati dai nomi univoci, condivisi e rinvenibili da cartelli/segnaletica/doc. pubblici/ PRG (piano regolatore) ecc. , ovvero nomi dal carattere ufficiale, questo seguendo questi indirizzi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Italy/Sentieri.  Riteniamo che identificare i sentieri con il proprio nome si importante anche per ragioni di sicurezza. A tale scopo sono state posizionate circa 200 paline segnaletiche .  Grazie
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-21 22:20:58+00:00): Mi scuso per non aver risposto prima e ringrazio Ivan per la sua spiegazione! Per quanto riguarda la mappatura dei sentieri proposta, si prega di controllare sia https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing che https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines. Grazie!
_____________________

My apologies for not responding earlier, & thank you Ivan for your explanation! In regard to your proposed trail mapping, please check both https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing & https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines. Thanks!
Maloss34 (2023-11-21 22:51:05+00:00): Si certo conoscevo le dinamiche e ad ogni inserimento (nomi dei sentieri) sarà richiesta, per evitare fraintendimenti, il controllo sui dati inseriti al fine di giungere alla corretta mappatura. E' interesse di tutti. Grazie
Maloss34 (2024-01-10 07:44:50+00:00): ciao, hanno nuovamente modificato da city a town considerando solo il valore quantitativo degli abitanti che secondo le linee guida non dimostra l'importanza della città https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:place 
per tali ragioni ho contattato l'autore per esortarlo a correggere la modifica.  Detto ciò non sembra corretto che vi si facciano modifiche senza contattare o coinvolgere il precedente autore arrivando così a soluzione condivise e quindi accettabili.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-27 03:50:22+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143190782
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-27 03:54:23+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15276
OSM-Contributer (2026-01-16 12:38:33+00:00): Reverted way 1218177805 in changeset 177296706 As, there is no other source supporting that a train station exists there. If you have proof supporting it, Contact me
vgeorge (2023-10-26 09:06:06+00:00): Hi b-jazz, 

The change of 'website' tag in way/338854825 doesn't look right to me. Not every website is properly configured to redirect from the apex domain to 'www' subdomain, so I would sugest not adding it to avoid breaking a correct link. Also, it looks like in this case it added an excessive slash characted. 

Thanks for your work on the bot. Fixing the HTTP protocol on website tags is really useful.
b-jazz (2023-10-26 15:27:21+00:00): Hey vgeorge, thanks for the report.

The bot doesn't prepend "www" to any URL. It also doesn't add a trailing "/" to them either. If you look at a request to the previous URL, you can see what the website is redirecting people to:

$ curl -I http://virviramos.com.br
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 15:20:32 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Connection: keep-alive
Location: https://www.virviramos.com.br//

I'm hesitant to make any assumptions and replace the erroneous "//" with a single "/" or even remove it altogether. What are your thoughts?

I did a query on this in my area and found dozens of websites that redirect to https://www.example.com//, so it is far from uncommon.
vgeorge (2023-10-26 16:05:07+00:00): Hi b-jazz, 

I wasn't aware the bot checked if a redirection was in place. I thought it was just pre-pending 'www.' and changing to 'https'. 

If you are checking every URL, it makes sense to use the redirected URL if it doesn't change the domain, like stated in the documentation.

Thanks for the clarification 👍
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-25 06:50:37+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11287884410
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11287884411

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-25 06:50:36+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11287891393
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/383668666

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
HirschKauz (2024-01-26 11:26:21+00:00): Hi redrace :-)
Bist Du Dir sicher bei 'Bornheim' im Namen vom DHL Verteilerzentrum? 
Grüße
redrace (2024-01-26 14:01:03+00:00): Nein das ist bestimmt ein Paste and Copy Fehler! Änderst Du das bitte ich bin zur Zeit nicht zu Hause.
HirschKauz (2024-01-26 14:44:11+00:00): ist gemacht - Grüße
redrace (2024-01-26 15:08:27+00:00): Besten Dank!
Leutrim Veliu (2023-10-25 07:17:58+00:00): Please, approve my change here.
user_5359 (2023-10-25 15:54:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys). Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org!
VictorIE (2023-11-02 07:39:46+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1216405970
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1216404391

Parts of The View and The Close overlap. What si the name at that point?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/917137323

The cyclepath has been dragged on the map. I can fix that if you wish.

What is the name of the estate?
Frans S (2023-10-25 08:14:51+00:00): Hello Barbara,
Please add a tag to your mappings (highway on this task) 
Yesterday I also send you a message about this
Best regards
Frans S (2023-10-25 08:19:26+00:00): Hello again.
I mend to say that the tagging method is not correct.
Highways need to be tagged as highway=....(unclassified, track, residential etc)
Best regards
Dawid2849 (2023-10-25 13:27:28+00:00): thanks for adding so many details! though, I think that this pipeline (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1218205997) doesn't exist anymore (at least overground)
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-25 08:00:26+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/733229393

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-25 08:00:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być formatu XX-XXX, gdzie X oznacza cyfrę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11287952246

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
5m4u9 (2023-10-27 03:12:42+00:00): Hola, kerb=raised significa que son pasos peatonales elevados y que el auto sube encima... eso casi no existe en Cochabamba a excepción de 4 o 5 en lugares específicos...
JaimeSBO (2023-10-28 01:38:14+00:00): Hola Marco,
Gracias por la aclaración. Pensaba que se refería a la altura de acera. Osea que hay como una grada para bajar a la calle y otra para subir a la acera al usar el paso peatonal.
Ahora entiendo 
Saludos!
5m4u9 (2023-10-28 05:02:49+00:00): Hola Jaime, gracias por editar y que bien que hayas usado la app Street Complete para detallar el mapa, siempre hay algo nuevo.

por ahora en Cochabamba es una de las pocas ciudades en Bolivia (quizá la única) que tenemos detalles de cruces peatonales, pero en muchos lugares solo para advertir a los autos/motos/bicis y peatones que "existe" un paso de zebra.

En muchos lugares cerca a parques/plazas y jardineras de avenidas tenemos mapeados pasos peatonales que conectan a las aceras y ahí a los costados hay los "cordones de acera" (eso sí son los que pensabas). 

Con las nuevas imágenes satelitales en las que se pueden ver claramente los pasos peatonales, estoy aumentando los detalles.... 😉

aquí hay un ejemplo cerca que esta muy bien mapeado y sirve para aprender:

* cruce peatonal (intersección zebra y calle)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2296982096

* el camino peatonal de zebra
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220317533

* el cordón de acera (kerb levantado)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2294518704

Cualquier duda me escribes 😉😉
5m4u9 (2023-10-28 05:17:58+00:00): Ahora pensando un poco, el cambio que hiciste no está del todo mal, y representa que a los lados hay cordones de acera elevados, pero me parece muy muy genérico, qué sucede si al lado derecho es elevado y a la izquierda es para sillas de ruedas? igual aunque genérico mejor detalles en el mapa es mejor.
SekeRob (2023-10-25 08:10:13+00:00): Anyone seeing this, this Forest relation is a mess, a mess at 2300 members with inconsistent polygon mapping techniques used. Needs urgent splitting.
joost schouppe (2023-11-22 08:24:28+00:00): You mean 2021 :)
kortgodt (2023-10-25 08:50:58+00:00): Del af skoven der ligger på østsiden af anelystvej hedder som det der ligger på vestsiden af Anelystvej True Skov og er ejet af naturstyrelsen.
kortgodt (2023-10-25 09:00:43+00:00): https://udinaturen.dk/shelter/12429
osmviborg (2023-10-25 09:11:35+00:00): Så skal denne være en del af multipolygonen True Skov https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1027039374
solenoid jam (2023-11-07 05:25:15+00:00): Здравствуйте. Похоже вы довольно сильно промахиваетесь с выбором цвета зданий в более тёмную сторону, вот тут например:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42737676

https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=55.7842234&lon=37.6906054&zoom=19&camera.theta=67.918&camera.phi=23.778

Это надо исправлять, так не годится.

Вот тут можно посмотреть названия некоторых цветов (только заглавные буквы из названий надо поменять на строчные):
https://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css_colors.php

Пожалуйста, уделите этому больше внимания.
MarinaKuzko (2023-11-07 07:34:05+00:00): Спасибо. Обязательно учту в работе.
aTarom (2023-10-25 09:11:39+00:00): Hola DannyZas, bienvenido y gracias por editar, una pregunta por favor, la altitud del pico
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/571121503/history
"2640" -> "2645"
de donde la obtienes? es para tenerlo en cuenta en futuras revisiones de alturas de pico, gracias y feliz mapeo
DannyZas (2023-10-25 09:25:42+00:00): Buenos días, estos días voy a actualizar la información sobre Candanchú. Hay ciertos datos, como el pico, que no tenía pensado actualizarlos pero al verlos detallados en los mapas de la estación he decidido hacerlo.

He utilizado la información que aparece en la web de la estación de esquí: https://www.candanchu.com/estacion-esqui/ (la foto de tuca blanca muestra el mapa). En el mapa aparece esa altura, simplemente me he limitado a copiarla. En caso de ser incorrecto no tengo problema en eliminar el cambio.
aTarom (2023-10-25 15:02:57+00:00): ok, gracias por comunicarte, creo que es mejor dejar los de IGN (tienes la capa en el editor como "Cartografía Ráster del IGN"), mira este por ejemplo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4210591822/history
2322 -> 2400
78 metros, es mucha diferencia

No se de donde sacarán ellos los datos pero no parecen fiables y tampoco tenemos permiso, si quieres comentarlo en la comunidad, y así tener más opiniones, disponemos de estos canales principalmente
https://t.me/OSMes
ó
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51
Saludos
canfe (2024-01-21 06:34:44+00:00): Perché passi dei building=yes a building=contruction, quando dalle immagini aeree si vede che sono ampiamente finiti con tanto di giardino verde?
Syl (2023-10-25 12:30:21+00:00): Bonjour, cette porte n'est pas l'entrée principale, c'est plutôt celle-ci qui est déjà présente : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5150562706
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
philippec (2023-10-25 17:26:47+00:00): Tielt Sint Jozef
Ik vind de muur van de foto niet.
philippec (2023-10-25 17:28:38+00:00): Had ik nog niet aangeraden met ID te werken ?  U hebt de AED drie keer gemapt.  Zulke fouten gebeuren konstant met Mapcomplete.
philippec (2023-10-25 18:40:08+00:00): Dat laatste bericht is verkeerd.
Ik maak ook veel fouten en probeer mij ertegen in te dekken.
driesverlinden (2023-10-26 07:49:33+00:00): Bedankt om even mee te kijken philippec!

Het leek me handig om het via MapComplete te doen aangezien ik ook net ter plaatse was en het toestel zag hangen. 

Wat bedoel je precies met "drie keer gemapt"? Het feit dat er drie updates zijn gebeurd van hetzelfde knooppunt? Dat is vermoedelijk de manier waarop MapComplete dat verwerkt. 

Ik ben ook nog volop aan het leren. Het leek me vooral belangrijk dat het toestel geregistreer geraakte.
philippec (2023-10-26 09:02:22+00:00): Dat was een foute gedachtengang van mij 's avonds laat.  Na zovele fouten gezien te hebben dacht ik dat dat ook fout was zonder goed te kijken.
driesverlinden (2023-10-26 09:07:31+00:00): Ah. Ok :) Ik probeer mijn best te doen en sta uiteraard altijd open voor feedback.