piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hufkratzer (2023-06-13 11:39:21+00:00): Hi,
hier hast du das building=yes entfernt und dafür leisure=horse_riding drangetaggt. Das ist aus mehreren Gründen schlecht:
1. ist ist das Gebäude jetzt nicht mehr als Gebäude auf der Karte sichtbar.
2. sollte das Tag leisure=horse_riding nicht für einzelne Gebäude, sondern für komplette Reitanlagen verwendet werden, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
und z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/890801258

Für Reithallen gibt es https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building=riding_hall, dafür gibt es aber im iD-Editor noch keinen Preset, das müsstest du eintippen.
gscholz (2024-01-02 09:05:14+00:00): Hi santioviedo08,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of "960 Viviendas":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-65.45078&lat=-33.69015&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.67&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=137261819

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12044886/history

I have just fixed this.
Kind regards
Guido
Taya_S (2023-06-13 03:45:48+00:00): Hallo Jostica,

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Groeten,
Taya
ExoMal (2023-06-14 11:43:01+00:00): Hi GinaroZ, was wondering why you deleted the crossing tags from two ways on Lapwing Dr?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137262155
GinaroZ (2023-06-21 23:23:39+00:00): Probably just to be consistent with all the other (shared) pavements around here which don't have them tagged - plus they had crossing:markings=yes (wrong) and crossing=yes (why?!).
ExoMal (2023-06-22 16:35:58+00:00): Fair enough I suppose, I'm considering in the distant future maybe to start mapping crossings in the area per the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing) which will probably be quite an undertaking.
aharvey (2025-01-15 03:24:45+00:00): I'm still noticing a lot of duplicated streams here, for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/210580351 which it looks like you've extended to duplicate on top of the existing stream?

I realise this is from a year ago, but if it's an issue from your workflow it would be good to correct it. In JOSM it's a good idea to have View > Draw boundaries of downloaded data turned on and only edit data within that area.
aharvey (2025-01-15 03:33:29+00:00): I think I've fixed up all the ones I could see for now.
Tom Brennan (2025-01-15 05:57:16+00:00): Sorry, it's been over 18 months so I'm not sure what the problem with my workflow was. I suspect some failure in my extract to pull the existing data down off the server. It's hard to make sense of the errors otherwise. It looks like most of the problem ones had an existing stream but no name.

I've run a script in QGIS over the OSM data to check for intersections. I think I have fixed most of the breaks in this area (there were another 4 or 5), but need to do it by smaller area as QGIS chokes on intersecting the full Hawkesbury catchment.
CurlingMan13 (2023-09-18 21:26:49+00:00): These railway features do not exist (at least anymore).  These no longer existing features should be added to OpenHistoricalMaps where it can live on forever.  OHM is designed for historical features.

Since these "abandoned/razed" railways gave been completely removed, they should not be added to OSM.  These ways should be removed, and instead be added to OHM.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#:~:text=Place%20where%20railway,can%20be%20mapped.
Ktr101 (2023-09-20 01:31:03+00:00): My goal is to switch this over, but I want to master JOSM first. As long as there are no objections to this being there now, I plan on looking at this in the next month or so, along with other edits of the same variety.
Mashin (2023-06-17 15:50:09+00:00): Hi, Please don't create overlaps between Fairways and Greens polygons. See here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls
Taya_S (2023-06-13 03:32:09+00:00): Hallo Nezavanderleeuw

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Groeten,
Taya
lipuma (2023-06-13 13:40:04+00:00): Hi b-unicycling. I had never heard of a ringfort before, nor about it's different types. Maybe you could add information to the OSM wiki about ringfort types in order to make the tagging more uniform and established.

On taginfo I also see people use ringfort_type.

Happy mapping!
b-unicycling (2023-06-13 14:04:07+00:00): There are thousands of them in Ireland, I think 40,000 is the current estimate.
I only ever add ringfort=cashel, when it is one, i.e. when it is surrounded by a wall. I'm not aware of any other types. I'm not a fan of overusing "_type".
ququruzka (2023-06-13 12:03:42+00:00): вітаю !
Вкажіть будь-ласка причини таких ваших правок ? 
На території України назви вулиць іменуються виключно українською мовою.
Javier Sanchez (2023-06-13 16:18:07+00:00): Hola
No te olvides de usar la cuenta de importación para importar.
mboesch (2023-06-13 05:26:45+00:00): Are you sure? Two weeks ago the road was blocked, there was a big red and white sign "no motorized traffic", they were working on conrete tunnels for the stream and of course with an offroad vehicle or tractor you can pass, but visitors should not be routed there until the road is finished and open to the public, regards mboesch
mboesch (2023-06-13 05:28:09+00:00): We wanted to hike this part of E6, the scenery was nice, but it was, definitely, a road under construction. I guess there will be a tarmac road next time we pass there, regards mb
ika-chan! (2023-06-13 13:21:42+00:00): I can accept that the changeset comment was a bit off because of me using Potlatch, but I did my best to keep the access restrictions for motor vehicles.

According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction, I cannot mark a road as under construction if anything other than motor vehicles can still pass, and it is unclear if this is a short-term closure or not.

The wiki says that we should only tag construction sites if they are planned to be closed to all traffic for at least six to nine months.
mboesch (2023-06-13 19:52:44+00:00): We were there, and thought to be able to drive part of the way. There was a sign Road closed at the beginning and concrete blocks on the road after the thater. You can pass on foot or by bike as its park of long distance hiking trail E6 (you find some very old rusty signs...)
Bulldozers have mad the road twice as wide as expected on the satellite images, they are now doing conrete tunnels for the streams. we saw people working on huge concrete structures for one tunnel and they had already done a few. Some farmers drive around the blocks through the vegetation to reach their flocks, but you should not be guided there with navigation systems (thats why I would mark the road as closed).
It seems, the road is closed for several months now and it will take them probably another 6 or twelve months, but I think it's a project of a major road along the coastline and not just minor roadworks on a track used by farmers, probably the new  road will connect Alexandropouli - Dikelly with Maroneia. There is no end date for the works, but it seems they are really doing a major new road construction. I do not know how to tag better, but it should be clear, that you cannot pass by car and can follow the E6 trail on foot and by bike, regards from Switzerland Martin
ika-chan! (2023-06-13 21:02:55+00:00): I have now marked the affected roads with "motor_vehicle=destination" to signify no access to motor vehicles except, for example, access to farms. It may take a while for the routers to pick up the restrictions.
tyfi (2023-06-13 00:41:39+00:00): Relation #1061228 for MO E incorrectly used the "MO " prefix in its ref tag in the route relation, so I changed it to simply E.
tyfi (2023-06-13 00:45:15+00:00): As for the names of these relations, I do not care what they end up being. I chose "Missouri Route XX" since that's more consistent with MoDOT (previously routes were named "Missouri Highway XX", "Missouri State Supplemental Route XX", "MO XX", "SR XX", you name it), and it nicely matches the Wikipedia article titles (one such article is "Missouri Route M (Jefferson County)"). The latter carries less weight.

I mainly just wanted nicer alphanumeric sorting in JOSM. Feel free to change it to something else. As I state in my account bio, I value consistency over any notion of correctness.
tyfi (2023-06-13 00:47:36+00:00): Many of the relations had missing symbol tags, and many relations with symbol tags pointed to PNG thumbnails rather than the source SVG on Wikimedia Commons. I think I got all of them pointed to the SVGs. I also upgraded URLs to https since it was likewise an even mix of http/https.

This one's probably less important for data consumers than the MO E issue (which was problematic for OpenStreetMap Americana), but I wanted it to be consistent as well.
tyfi (2023-06-13 00:54:59+00:00): As far as what goes in the parentheses, if anything, in the route relation names, I do not care. Even though I changed some of the parenthetical text, that was during the beginning of my edit before I fully realized that this tag is meant for human editors. As such, put town names, county names, rough route descriptions, etc.
OddBunsen (2023-06-13 14:13:58+00:00): Is there a reason you made the grass out of two line segments and then used a multipolygon to connect them? Using the same line in two connected multipolygons usually makes it harder to edit in the future.
Emaltonator (2023-06-13 14:58:58+00:00): Are you referring to the entrance of ESA? The entrance wasn't included in the building
OddBunsen (2023-06-13 15:11:23+00:00): No, the grass was a multipolygon made of two ways.
Emaltonator (2023-06-13 16:00:04+00:00): Oh gotcha - that must've been a mistake then. Feel free to make whatever adjustments you see fit. Also continue to let me know if something looks off so I can note that for the future. Appreciate it!
OddBunsen (2023-06-13 17:21:45+00:00): Ok!
BCNorwich (2023-06-17 07:48:22+00:00): Hi, Are you sure folk do not walk these lines as paths? They don't have to be designated paths to exist. If folk walk them then they are highways.

Regards Bernard.
jacobwhall (2023-06-13 00:53:36+00:00): Relevant notes (sites that may have RVA Bike Share stations, but do not appear on OSM):

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3732866
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3732878
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3732880
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3732879
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3732875
jacobwhall (2023-06-13 00:58:00+00:00): Another relevant changeset, adding one I missed in this one

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137264059
jacobwhall (2023-08-04 15:28:10+00:00): Yet another...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139447199
BCNorwich (2023-06-17 07:56:58+00:00): Removed a duplicated section of footpath and tweaked barriers.
jacobwhall (2023-06-13 00:58:13+00:00): Relevant changeset

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137263973
skquinn (2023-06-13 01:00:18+00:00): Oops, meant to include "web search" in sources
Grove11 (2023-06-13 01:00:55+00:00): Changeset comment is incorrect - changeset moved Watstone node to middle
WC392309 (2023-06-14 11:45:28+00:00): I would actually keep that secondary this time, tit only connects the edge or Reston to the edge of Vienna/Fairfax. It is not a direct route unlike Old Ox Road which goes from Reston to Fairfax. Also if LCP is primary, SR 674 is secondary because it only has a couple of commercial/office areas each at the end/side of the street. Just my opinion
Joseph R P (2023-06-14 16:17:37+00:00): This route actually is used by commuters travelling between Fairfax/Oakton/Vienna to VA 7 towards Loudoun County rather than for getting to Reston or serving as a commercial thoroughfare. There are other similar two-lane semi-rural roads in the region that serve as commuter routes, like Yates Ford Road/Clifton Road, Gum Spring Road, and Lawyers Road.
kirma (2023-06-13 12:23:04+00:00): Polku jatkuu suoraan eteläkaakkoon (kaartaen kohden länttä) suojatiestä https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1181005358
Taya_S (2023-06-13 03:38:14+00:00): Hallo Dawn,

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Tip: Het is niet de bedoeling om onverbonden paden achter te laten. Nu lijkt het alsof dezee paden niet bereikbaar zijn omdat deze los liggen van de rest van de wegen.

Groeten,
Taya
Taya_S (2023-06-15 04:51:31+00:00): Hallo Dawn,

Ik heb de paden terug gezet in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137352627

Groeten, 
Taya
lipuma (2023-06-14 13:13:35+00:00): Hi MacLondon, what does the tag `cycleway:pictogram' mean?
Taya_S (2023-06-13 03:44:33+00:00): Hallo Dawn, ik heb deze changeset gecontroleerd.

Heb nog even een overgebleven railway crossing verwijderd. Verder ziet het er goed uit. Hooguit wil je https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1181519457 nog even controleren en de vorm aanpassen. 

Groeten,
Taya
Taya_S (2023-06-13 03:51:44+00:00): Correctie, na verdere controle denk ik dat je dit je https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/451794635 deel vergeten bent. Dit laat ik aan jou over. 

Groeten, Taya.
Taya_S (2023-06-15 04:59:22+00:00): Hallo Dawn,

Ik heb dit bijgewerkt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137352796

Groeten, Taya
tyfi (2023-06-13 03:26:06+00:00): Uh oh! The ways were unref'd because the W got expanded to "West"
tyfi (2023-06-13 03:26:34+00:00): Keep this in mind when hunting for unref'd supplemental routes
tyfi (2023-06-13 03:42:15+00:00): If this is the wrong translation to OSM classification, then I'm sorry about that. This was a completely undiscovered supplemental route.
Jrachi (2024-04-19 08:00:30+00:00): Ciao.
Ieri sono andato a verificare dei percorsi a catasto regionale nei dintorni di Losio.
Ora dopo avere percorso strade agricole e forestali e sentieri, oltre a un sacco di asfalto, vengo a chiederti con quale criterio hai inserito delle cicleway quando sono sentieri?
Inoltre il name inventati dai biker non sono il nome di una way.
Se nell'ambito ciclistico un sentiero è conosciuto con un nome si applica il tag MTB:name=*

Ivo
relaemanila (2023-06-14 12:25:23+00:00): Hello, where is your change? For vertical clearance, use maxheight = <meters>. For example, STAR Tollway the tag will be: maxheight = 4.27. And also, what source do you use for the vertical clearance?
adiatmad (2023-06-14 09:21:32+00:00): Hey there! Just a quick question: Are you planning to add the name of the house owner? 
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1181528829)

If not, keep up the awesome work and carry on with your fantastic contribution! 

But if you are, take a moment to check out this page for some guidance and suggestions.
Happy mapping!

(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137266987
Warin61 (2023-06-17 01:44:26+00:00): Hi,

Why break the roundabout (way 170503250 is part of it) into segments??? Each segment has exactly the same tags... 

I have restored it back to one entry.
ul2739 (2023-06-17 02:41:25+00:00): That was my mistake. Thanks for fixing it!
OpenPixelMapper (2023-06-13 05:30:47+00:00): Pressemitteilung:
https://www.frankfurt-tipp.de/ffm-aktuell/s/ugc/baubeginn-camberger-bruecke-nun-auch-fuer-den-fuss-und-radverkehr-bis-ende-2024-gesperrt.html
rhtb0 (2023-07-11 09:54:47+00:00): hello?
Why delete road(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1027590733/history) It's a new road
start_date is 2021-02-03
The satellite picture provided is an old picture
user_5359 (2023-06-13 06:04:20+00:00): Korrektur Kommentar: opening ist eine Größenangabe bei einer Fahrradhinderniss, gemeint ist hier start_date
okadatsuneo (2023-06-14 23:54:10+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM.
Why did you change the wood area to scrub?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137269715
RedAuburn (2023-06-17 16:16:11+00:00): i'm still not convinced about these cave entrances... are there any sources proving their existence in the middle of a road?
BCNorwich (2023-06-17 16:38:32+00:00): I've put the question to the person who added them.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-06-30 14:31:48+00:00): 1) are there three candle shops at this mall

2) these are candle shops, not department sores, right?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-06-30 14:32:09+00:00): Also, which of locations at this mall, if any, is accurate?
limes11 (2023-06-13 09:35:48+00:00): Hi

hat sich hier etwas am Wegeplan geändert? Falls die Wege tatsächlich wieder nutzbar sind, dann bitte auch den Verweis auf den Wegeplan entfernen. Sonst ist das nicht nachvollziehbar. Danke!

VG Limes
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-02 12:33:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10973034905

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10972401905

Are you sure that there are two shops here?

Are these a candle shop by any chance rather than department store?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-03 05:01:20+00:00): reverted, purported shop deleted
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-03 05:02:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10972943806 - are you sure that this mall has multiple Yankee candle department stores?
mueschel (2023-06-15 19:43:00+00:00): Hi,
you used a couple 'recycling' tags here that are not used in other places. Could you check these? All tags should be in English and preferably only those listed in the wiki should be used. See
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling
impiaaa (2023-11-17 17:34:07+00:00): If both names are signed, it's better to list both than to arbitrarily prefer one.
Samuele Battarra (2023-06-13 21:59:44+00:00): Ciao, perché hai tolto il doppio nome alla via? Si trova sul confine.
Aluminum0173 (2023-06-14 03:15:49+00:00): Ciao, scusa, perché osmose me lo segnava come problema, c'era name left name right e name tutti uguali
Aluminum0173 (2023-06-14 06:35:50+00:00): Nel frattempo ho fatto un reverse del changelog ripristinando allo stato iniziale.
Samuele Battarra (2023-06-14 20:10:13+00:00): In effetti name e name:left name:right sulla stessa way sono errati. O uno o l'altro. In questo caso l'errore era stato in un precedente changeset che aveva introdotto il name. Ora ho sistemato.
limes11 (2023-06-13 09:43:26+00:00): Hi,

habe ich rückgängig gemacht. Diese Wege sind nicht freigegeben.

Im Siebengebirge gilt: Nur beschilderte Wege sind zu betreten.   Alles andere ist tabu, daher stehen hier nicht überall Verbotsschilder.

VG
Norbosm (2023-06-26 05:34:08+00:00): Das kenne ich anders. Es gibt keine Schilder "sie dürfen hier den Wald betreten." Wegweiser sind unabhängig von Access-Schildern.
Gruß Norbert
limes11 (2023-06-26 17:46:19+00:00): Der Wegeplan des Siebengebirges ist vor Ort an vielen Stellen zu finden. Dort ist erkennbar, welche Wege betreten werden dürfen. Die Wege um die Seen hier gehören nicht dazu. Entsprechende Verbotsschilder setzt die Behörde in der Regel nicht.
Markus366 (2023-06-13 17:14:47+00:00): Die Quellelage ist problematisch und muss überprüft werden.

Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137271113#map=16/51.3899/10.3426
user_13528767 (2023-06-14 12:28:06+00:00): Strecke abgefahren. Die Stationierung laut Stationszeichen zeigt für diesen Abschnitt L 1032.
highflyer74 (2023-06-13 07:00:25+00:00): Moin!

Sei so nett, bei leerstehenden Geschäftsräumen nicht zu löschen, sondern das https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix anzuwenden. Dies erhält die Historie des Objekts und hilft bei der Qualitätssicherung, da Apps regelmässig den aktuellen Stand des POIs abfragen können.

Gruss aus HB!
lberges (2023-06-13 07:37:29+00:00): Es war nicht als leerstehend gekennzeichnet, und ich weiß auch nicht, ob es jetzt leer steht.
highflyer74 (2023-06-13 07:44:49+00:00): Wenn der POI umgezogen ist, wird dort jetzt entweder Leerstand sein, oder etwas anderes. Die oben beschriebene Vorgehensweise ermöglicht es anderen, dieses zu überprüfen.

Das ist eben generell das Problem, wenn man irgendwo editiert, ohne die Gegebenheiten zu kennen. Aber das wurde ja schon öfter diskutiert... ;-)
lberges (2023-06-13 07:58:24+00:00): Wenn jemand an der alten Adresse (Stresemannstr.) die neue Adresse (Breitenweg) einträgt, ohne den POI auch zum Breitenweg zu verschieben, dann darf das weg.
highflyer74 (2023-06-13 08:08:36+00:00): Nein, da liegst du falsch. Dann entfernt man die falsche Adresse, setzt den POI auf siehe oben und weist den letzten Mapper freundlich auf die Problematik hin. Ggf kann man dann auch erfahren, was dort jetzt ist und dies gleich richtig mappen.
Romwriter (2023-06-13 17:57:32+00:00): Repariert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137297357
Markus366 (2023-06-13 13:18:47+00:00): Hallo,
eine Frage zur Einstufung:
wie kommst du zur Klassifizierung bzw was ist die Quelle hierzu?

Vor Ort scheint das als Gewerbestraße, die an eine Bundesstraße angebunden ist.

Gruß Markus
user_13528767 (2023-06-13 13:25:30+00:00): Hallo Markus,

als Quelle dient mir das TLBV, Region Nord.

https://bau-verkehr.thueringen.de/media/tmil_la_bau_verkehr/Service/Strassenkarten/Netzknotenkarte_Region_Nord_2023.pdf

Gruß 

Das Ampelmänchen
Markus366 (2023-06-13 13:54:20+00:00): Die Quelle ist meines Wissens nach aber nicht nutzbar für osm.

Vor einer Übernahme dieser Angaben sollte es andersweitig geprüft werden.
user_13528767 (2023-06-13 14:03:43+00:00): Also dient die Behörde welche die Bundesstraße in Vertretung für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland nicht als zuverlässige Quelle?

Das TLBV, Region Nord führt zudem gerade Straßenbauarbeiten auf diesem Teilstück der B 247 durch (siehe VAO REF43-B 247-23/05/015-EIC). Das TLBV darf Straßensanierung nur auf Bundes- oder Landesstraßen durchführen.
Mehr Beweise sind doch nicht nötig.
Markus366 (2023-06-13 16:28:21+00:00): Ist geht nicht um die Zuverlässigkeit.  Es geht um das Urheber Recht bzw. die fehlende Lizenz. Das Land Thüringen erlaubt schlicht nicht die Nutzung für osm.
user_13528767 (2023-06-13 16:33:33+00:00): Der Freistaat Thüringen stellt die Straßenkarten öffentlich zur Verfügung. Dadurch ist die Quelle der und somit auch die Qualität der Daten gegeben. Ich als Bürger mit Zugang zu den Straßenkarten des TLBV habe die darin vorhandenen Daten in osm eingetragen. Hierbei liegt weder eine Lizenz- noch eine Urheberrechtsverletzung vor.
Markus366 (2023-06-13 16:57:20+00:00): Das ist leider nicht der Fall.

Nur weil etwas öffentliche einsehbar ist, darf es nicht beliebig genutzt werden. Auch osm macht Vorgaben, wie deren Daten genutzt werden dürfen.

Bitte siehe dazu auch das wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Potential_Datasources oder eine der Foren Debatten https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/open-data-in-thuringen/80504/12

Wenn das die Quellen deine Edits ist, dann schlage ich vor, diese zurück zunehmen bis sie andersseitig validiert werden konnten.
user_13528767 (2023-06-13 17:07:44+00:00): Aufgrund der derzeitigen Streckensperrung bin ich eben noch mit dem Fahrrad vorbeigefahren. Die Stationierung laut Stationszeichen zeigt auch die B 247 auf dem Teilstück der Zeißstraße.
Markus366 (2023-06-13 17:13:48+00:00): Sehr schön. Dann kannst du das vielleicht in den kommenden Tagen zwischen Beinrode und Beuren wiederholen.  Hier besteht ja vermutlich die gleiche Quellenlage.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137270883
stillhart (2025-06-18 20:46:03+00:00): That's some nice square wood