piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:54:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459349
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
user_5359 (2026-02-11 18:55:45+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Gibt es einen Grund, warum Du die Adresse zweimal an der gleichen Stelle angelegt hast?
richi2513 (2026-02-12 09:42:57+00:00): Nein das war wohl ausversehen doppelt
richi2513 (2026-02-13 23:27:37+00:00): Hi sry für die komische Antwort ich dachte wegen den Namen das wär nen bot oder so :). Aber hab mir dein Profil durchgelesen macht Sinn. 
Aber ja nochmal danke für den Hinweis. Muss ich da jetzt einen der Knoten wieder löschen und wenn ja wie? Oder einfach den ganzen Eintrag löschen und einen neuen erstellen mit nur einem Knoten?
user_5359 (2026-02-14 04:23:52+00:00): Das war keine komische Antwort. In der Regel sollte ein Programm das zweifache Abschicken eines Eintrages verhindern. Sollte Dir das nochmal passieren, wäre ein Hinweis an den Programm-Editor sinnvoll.
Ich habe übrigens einen der beiden Knoten bereis gelöscht, es ist also alles in Ordnung.
Noch viel Spaß mit OSM!
richi2513 (2026-02-14 12:12:34+00:00): Alles klar danke 👍
cartografy (2026-02-11 15:37:13+00:00): Correction: Source used was Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2025-12-11
gurglypipe (2026-02-11 15:37:37+00:00): oops, the source should reference changeset 177868954, not 177988440.
Rainero (2026-03-15 21:27:36+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179918431
(unzulässige Quelle)
Dodko (2026-02-13 14:15:07+00:00): OSM nie je na hranie.
VLD0251 (2026-02-11 18:54:02+00:00): Hello, thank you for adding this.the tag name should only contain the name of the practice or doctor, without the specialty
the specialty "internal medicine and cardiology" can be added with healthcare:speciality=internal_medicine;cardiology
it is also recommended to use the international format for the phone number (+213…).
Happy mapping!
Taya_S (2026-02-12 08:49:51+00:00): Hello,

On OSM the coastline is mapped at the mean high water line (high tide). In some sections you've moved the coastline well into the intertidal zone. Please take care to map the coastline in the right place. Using multiple different sets of imagery often helps nail down the coastline when visual clues alone aren't enough.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:08:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467697
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
BCNorwich (2026-02-11 18:05:48+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Firstly there is no need to advertise or promote your business via changeset comments or tagged descriptions, as they serve no purpose; the public will not see them. It's best to just use a website tag/link on the POI.

Secondly I doubt the clinic is situated in the middle of the High Street where you placed it. I think the clinic might be at the Spire Bushey Hospital.

I've corrected your tags so you can just move the POI node to the correct position.

Need any help, please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
rskedgell (2026-02-12 13:09:24+00:00): Overwriting the place=town node for Bushey was more than a little unhelpful to data consumers.

I've moved the clinic node to Spire Bushey Hospital, changed the speciality to the value documented in the wiki and updated tags on the hospital.

This is the second edit like this we have seen, suggesting that a markerter may be doing this as an undiscussed automated/organised edit with the following characteristics:
* overwriting the place=town node where the clinic is located (potentially s. 3 CMA 1990)
* failing to include the name of the hospital in addr:housename=*
* adding healthcare=hospital + emergency=yes rather than healthcare=clinic, which are properties of the hospital (and it's extremely irresponsible to add emergency=yes at a private hospital which doesn't have an A&E department)
* using a form of healthcare:speciality=* which isn't in the wiki

(Mr Acharya - if  you paid for this, get your money back!)
Hollywood Theater Burleson TX (2026-02-11 17:01:47+00:00): Kendall Highway
Fizzie-DWG (2026-02-11 22:19:00+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178428236
Hollywood Theater Burleson TX (2026-02-11 16:59:59+00:00): Mom Avenue.
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:54:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459345
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
granitschädel (2026-03-04 08:46:24+00:00): Der Übergang am Dreiseitenhof hat eine Verkehrsinsel, die ist nur auf dem Luftbild noch nicht da
Patchi (2026-02-12 06:35:59+00:00): Bonjour Jean-Louis,

Les voies https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53197429 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/607455058 ont maintenant un tag highway=minor qui me parait bien étrange. Est-ce que ce changement est volontaire ?

Bonne continuation,

Pacthi.
JLZIMMERMANN (2026-02-13 10:26:00+00:00): Bonjour Patchi,
Je suis chargé de mission outils digitaux routiers au sein du CD84 et à ce titre j'en profite pour faire de la mise à jour des voies qui n'ont plus le bon niveau hiérarchique ni les bons ref.
Il se peut qu'il y ait des tâtonnement, merci pour tes vigilances.
J'ai donc mis ce tronçon en residential faute de mieux.
Bonne fin de semaine
Jean-Louis
eggie (2026-02-11 17:04:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-02-11 16:32:22+00:00): Hi AccuracyMatters, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 2 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178414017
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-11 16:42:43+00:00): According to satellite imagery, the deleted woods still exist. 

Please also see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178410003#c1554357
azdenardi (2026-02-11 21:33:06+00:00): Salve! Il toponomo "Carbonata" è corretto? Conosco "Carbonate", nome presente nella Cartografia Tecnica Regionale e nome della vicina galleria ferroviaria.
il Vaz (2026-02-11 22:25:54+00:00): Salve, ho chiesto un po' in giro a Nove a delle persone esperte e mi dicono che le Carbonate sono la zona da dove nasce il vallone, mentre il colatoio lo chiamano Carbonata. 
Poi si sa, sono delle sfumature che cambiano anche da zona a zona. 
Se ritiene sia corretto da fonti certe, corregga pure l'item. 

Cordialità 

Demis
stoerte (2026-02-16 10:39:05+00:00): Einen wunderschönen guten Tag!

Unverändert zu unserem letzten Kontakt: danke dir für dein Engagement auf OSM!
Leider muss ich erneut feststellen, dass du Bahnstrecken fälschlicherweise umbenannt hast.
Eine Bahnstrecke mit dem Eigennamen "Zittau-Görlitz-Cottbus-(Berlin) und Gegenrichtung" gibt es nicht. Diese Strecke heißt eindeutig "Berlin–Görlitz" und trägt keinerlei Zusätze. Gerne kannst du einen description=* Tag hinzufügen, in dem du diese Beschreibung des Streckenverlaufs ergänzt, im name=* Tag hat das Ganze allerdings nichts verloren!

Solltest du das anders sehen, dann kannst du es hierunter gerne erläutern. Bis dahin revidiere ich deinen Änderungssatz.


Mit freundlichen Grüßen
stoerte
309_308_307 (2026-02-12 00:23:27+00:00): Hallo, du hast mit diesem Änderungssatz u. a. die Gleise der Königsteiner Bahn auf construction gesetzt. Die Züge fahren dort noch, es wird bislang noch nichts gebaut. Auch der Abzweig nach Frankfurt Hbf wird nach Ende der Bauarbeiten am 27. Februar wieder regulär befahren werden, abgerissen ist da gar nichts. Am besten wäre es, alles zu revertieren.
309_308_307 (2026-02-12 00:25:48+00:00): revertiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178430838
DrmedWurst24513 (2026-02-12 01:34:00+00:00): Da ist mir ein Fehler passiert, danke für den Hinweis & revert. Die anderen, nicht die Königsteiner Bahn betreffenden Änderungen würde ich jedoch erneut hochladen, da war ja noch mehr als nur der Bereich Höchst drin.
stasiu512 (2026-02-11 16:24:01+00:00): duży BBOX ze względu na rozłączenie granicy od jezdni
rskedgell (2026-02-12 13:24:39+00:00): Thanks for deleting the descriptive name=* tag and adding a note.

For vacant business premises, you can use a lifecycle prefix, which in this case would mean adding something like disused:shop=yes or disused:amenity=restaurant together with check_date=*

These should be picked up by apps like StreetComplete and will prompt users to check whether it is still vacant.
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:54:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459340
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisBot (2026-02-11 16:56:35+00:00): 🌍 Bienvenue sur OSM, CCRR22.
Merci de contribuer !

Pour faciliter la collaboration et aider les autres à comprendre vos modifications, il est préférable d'ajouter une courte description des changements que vous avez apportés. Des commentaires clairs aident la communauté à suivre votre travail et à fournir des retours plus précis. Vous pouvez trouver des conseils pour rédiger de bons commentaires ici[1].

✅ Voici un exemple de commentaire basé sur vos modifications de carte : "Ajusté les géométries de diverses fonctionnalités"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, CCRR22.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Adjusted various feature geometries"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
eggie (2026-02-11 17:36:39+00:00): WElkom bij OSM.. Houdt het gebied van je edits klein . Dus niet schuiven met de kaart.
Alle gebouwen zijn ingemeten import svp niets aan veranderen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-11 17:34:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  name=Schuurtje hoort niet op de kaart. Dat zit al in de tagging building=shed.
Gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster. Dat is ingemeten.. Dus beter niet anders uitlijnen. Een schuingenomen luchtfoto zet je op het verkeerde been.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-11 17:43:25+00:00): Gebouwen weer hersteld
eggie (2026-02-11 18:01:43+00:00): boom teruggeplaatst
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=178414676
elsy1 (2026-02-11 16:47:45+00:00):  درود وقت بخیر، شما که روی تگ تغییرات اعمال میکنید حتی باید آن را کامل و صحیح اصلاح کنید مثلا تگ های دوربرگردان همان ترانک مانده و جاده را تغییر دادید. که البته برای این جاده دوبانده رفت و برگشت باید همان ترانک یا پرایمری باشد توضیح شما برای این چه هست؟
eggie (2026-02-11 17:53:33+00:00): Hoi,

De afslagbeperking klopt niet.
Die is alttijd van from via naar to. Ik zie hier twee keer from.
.. Hoe zit het met de fietspadverbinding?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-11 18:03:58+00:00): Afslagbeperking hersteld.
1x from verwijderd uit de relatie.
Kennelijk geldt dit ook voor tweewielers
BromBrom (2026-02-11 18:17:42+00:00): Hoi eggie,

Ik had het attribuut gekopieerd van "Weg: Willem van Outhoornstraat (7473912)". Ik wil voorkomen dat de navigatie vanaf Willem van Outhoornstraat linksaf de Laan van NOI inrijdt, wat verboden is.

De Laan van NOI is naar mijn mening te simplistisch weergegeven. We hebben vier rijstroken, twee in elke richting (met bussen in het midden), gescheiden door een doorlopende lijn. Als die rijstroken correct zouden worden weergegeven, zouden we de navigatie denk ik makkelijk kunnen aanpassen.

Er zijn ook fietspaden en trottoirs aan beide zijden.

Ik ben geen ervaren editor. Bedankt dat je de tijd neemt om me te helpen.

Mvg,
Tom
eggie (2026-02-11 18:21:22+00:00): De afslagbeperking is nu goed.. Hij begon iets te vroeg. Je hebt maar twee wegdelen en een node nodig
Gr eggie
BromBrom (2026-02-11 18:29:20+00:00): Fantastisch! Dank daarvoor.
qstep (2026-02-11 18:42:13+00:00): Pakoltam még rá pár címkét: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178420192
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:54:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459327
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:53:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459318
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:53:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459305
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
rskedgell (2026-02-12 12:38:04+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding your practice.

Unfortunately, your edit overwrote the tags of the existing place=suburb node for Blackheath, which would be somewhat unhelpful to data consumers.

I have moved the tags to a new POI, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13546012727 - you may wish to tweak the location within the hospital buildings.

I have also updated the address etc., tags of Blackheath Hospital, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/591570712
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:53:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459291
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:53:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459282
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
LakeTana (2026-02-24 23:18:49+00:00): Hello, joserrg12, I noticed that you have updated this area using “Mapbox Satellite” imagery. I reviewed the latest Mapbox Satellite imagery available, but I was unable to confirm the recent changes. Do you have any additional resources or local insight that could help me understand the updates?
joserrg12 (2026-02-25 14:12:11+00:00): Hello, the road is as it was last updated; construction is currently halted. However, family members who work for the Ministry of Public Works and Transport (MOPT) regularly visit the area. Some of the surrounding streets are municipal, but others were built by the construction company to bring in machinery, so they are not public or suitable for traffic. Regards.
LakeTana (2026-02-26 15:47:18+00:00): Thank you for sharing the additional context and insight regarding the resources being used. I appreciate you taking the time to clarify your perspective.
joserrg12 (2026-02-26 16:40:10+00:00): Hi LakeTana, with pleasure! The goal is always to have a quality map. Best regards!
LakeTana (2026-02-26 17:32:01+00:00): I had an additional thought regarding this. Since construction is currently on hold and there are broken trunk segments along Corredor Norte between way 1473718363 and way 1454813047, the road does not currently function as a high-performance, state strategic corridor. What would you think about temporarily downgrading those broken sections to highway=unclassified and tagging them as construction=trunk or highway:proposed=trunk to accurately reflect the current on-the-ground situation? This will help keep the map true to its current state and not confuse other OSM users that there is an issue with broken data in the area. Let me know what you think!
BCNorwich (2026-02-12 07:01:28+00:00): Hi, I don't think your clinic is located on the pavement of Tranquil Vale. I don't think it's at The Shard either, as your website suggests. It could be at The Blackheath Hospital as the address suggests.

I've corrected your tags on the POI so could you please place the POI in the correct position. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
rskedgell (2026-02-12 12:35:58+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178455734
Fizzie-DWG (2026-02-11 21:52:41+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19767
SafwatHalaby (2026-02-12 09:04:41+00:00): שלום, מיפית את https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1476562009 כ-mtb:scale=1

האם אתה בטוח שזה מיפוי תקין? מדובר בכביש עפר דו גלגלי למיטב זכרוני.

תסתכל בתמונות כאן להשוואה: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale

אני יודע שהסקלה היא קצת סובייקטיבית, אבל אני מנסה לשמור על עקביות לפחות באזור הכרמל\היערן. בדרך כלל מה שאני מתייג ב-1 פחות או יותר ברמת הקושי של https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/280522491

אם מדובר בכביש עפר אבל לא איכותי, תשקול mtb:scale=0+
SafwatHalaby (2026-02-12 09:16:40+00:00): כנל לגבי 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/335363201

אני באמת לא חושב שזה scale=1 
בהתחשב למה שמיפיתי מקודם כ-scale 1 באזור
SafwatHalaby (2026-02-12 09:23:06+00:00): המפה הבאה תעזור קצת לדיון כי רואים בצבעים את mtb:scale על גאומטריות ה-path

https://israelhiking.osm.org.il/map/16.09/32.7329/35.0490

ירוק זה 0, כחול זה 1, אדום זה 2, ויותר גבוה מזה זה 3
SafwatHalaby (2026-02-12 09:27:32+00:00): יותר גבוה מזה זה שחור*
Dindia (2026-02-12 11:52:14+00:00): אתה צודק. עשיתי טעות ושיניתי MTB SCALE במקום 
TRACK TYPE
משנה חזרה
Dindia (2026-02-12 11:56:48+00:00): I changed  track type from "paved" to "mostly solid"
SafwatHalaby (2026-02-17 13:38:39+00:00): תודה
literan (2026-02-11 19:09:00+00:00): здесь нет secondary-трафика. Верну
Alexey_ND (2026-02-12 05:30:29+00:00): Трафик считать не нужно. Каким тегом нужно обозначать линк между двумя secondary дорогами?
Прочтите описание...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway=secondary_link
Действительно верните, картографируйте правильно!
literan (2026-02-12 07:50:32+00:00): Трафик считать нужно. В России сообществом принята https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification - согласно которой в основе классификации дорог, используемой в теге highway, лежит относительная важность ("значимость") дороги в дорожной сети. Поэтом линк между двумя secondary дорогами может быть разным - исходя из его значимости. Это может быть и unclassified, если этот линк используется только для подъезда к локальному ЖК.

По вашей ссылке указано в полном соответствии с вышесказанным: "Съезды на развязках дорог с той же важностью в дорожной сети, что и highway=secondary". У данного съезда нет той же важности в дорожной сети, что и highway=secondary - он используется только для выезда с tertiary-дорог на территории МГУ.
Alexey_ND (2026-02-12 08:27:42+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
Все четко изложено! Мне не принципиально, но... речь идет про важность соединяемых ДОРОГ а не линков. Соотв и еще раз, трафик тут вообще не причем! Линк соединяющий 2е секондари дороги, строго говоря, должен быть секондари линком, все в соответствии со статьей.
Более того, думаете как я нашел это место? Валидаторы данных осм тригерят о неточности.
Еще раз, мне не принципиально, сама дорожная сеть будет функционировать и в таком виде но, разберитесь пожалуйста с трафиком (что это вообще такое), важностью дорог и линков.
С уважением Алексей.
literan (2026-02-12 19:39:20+00:00): линки это подвид дорог.

я с важностью дорог и линков давно разобрался, вместе с сообществом. Принципы мапинга дорог, увы, разные в разных странах (можете убедиться в этом просто взглянув на карту), в РФ они именно такие. Я выше процитировал - если вы хотите конкретно эти утверждения оспорить - так аргументируйте, а не пишите "трафик тут вообще ни при чем".  

Вероятно, поэтому валидатор, написанный немцами или англичанами, ругается в России - уже, наверное, тысячное напоминание о том, что не надо слепо верить валидаторам.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2026-02-13 00:01:48+00:00): Interesting use case

Also interesting to see you going from barely using mapcomplete to having your own custom layer
cimm (2026-02-13 09:02:15+00:00): The idea to add GTFS tags comes from a post by OrganicMaps: https://fosstodon.org/@organicmaps/116011424160931246

While playing with MapComplete I realized it might be faster to jump from station to station with a custom MapComplete theme, creating a sort of "semi-automation".

Thanks for MapComplete BTW! It's a fun tool to visualize the more hidden OSM features.
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-11 17:42:42+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 178410003, 178412149, 178414017.
NeisBot (2026-02-11 18:26:21+00:00): Hi JDAven9, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 29 landuse(s)
- 2 leisure(s)
- 10 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178418387
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-11 18:30:53+00:00): Thanks, looks legit.

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2775639
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:52:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459278
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
Layft Greater (2026-05-04 11:34:18+00:00): reverted in 182200615
rempshaener (2026-02-11 20:32:26+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe keine Anmerkungen.

Viele Grüße
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:52:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459272
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
flex16 (2026-02-12 12:26:09+00:00): Grundsätzlich sollen keine fragwürdigen lanes Werte wie 1.5 etc. getagged werden.

vgl: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes

Eher mit width oder narrow taggen
flex16 (2026-02-12 12:27:35+00:00): If your english, please dont tag odd lane values like 1.5 etc.

This is explained here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes
maro21 (2026-02-12 21:23:48+00:00): Mógłbyś podawać w komentarzu zmian co zmieniłeś, a nie wklejać do każdego swojego zestawu ten sam opis? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

Tutaj nie edytowałeś lasu, pola, drogi, ambony, schronienia ani ścieżki.
puchaczowsky (2026-03-28 18:06:59+00:00): czemu usunąłeś parking wraz z uliczkami skoro istnieje, tylko jest zamknięty?
NeisBot (2026-02-11 19:16:37+00:00): 🌍 Добро пожаловать в OSM, Омирали.
Спасибо за вклад!

Чтобы сделать сотрудничество проще и помочь другим понять твои правки, лучше добавить краткое описание сделанных изменений. Ясные комментарии помогают сообществу следить за твоей работой и предоставлять более лучшую обратную связь. Ты можешь найти советы по написанию хороших комментариев здесь[1].

✅ Вот пример комментария на основе твоих правок карты: "Добавлено имя '23//1'"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, Omirali.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added name "23//1""
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
StC (2026-02-11 21:33:46+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
Frans S (2026-02-14 11:53:00+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
When you locate an object showing no shadow, don't map it. Mostly a courtyard.
Often there is a (round) building close to it.
Don't map complete fenced yards either.
statelyelms (2026-02-15 05:26:50+00:00): Just wanted you to be aware that the dataset you pull from is probably outdated, it encompasses areas that have been allowed by the university to be developed in decades past. Yeah, even though it's government, sadly.
(Not the reviewer, just a local mapper who saw the area go up)
breau (2026-02-15 11:48:33+00:00): In agreement that the Corbett Centre and Knowledge Park don't belong in a Wildlife Refuge. However, this data came from GNB's Wildlife refuges, which is described as "Updated Continuously". I'll keep an eye out for a more up to date dataset.  

Pulled these shapes from the "Wildlife refuges" found here: https://www.gnb.ca/en/campaign/geonb/data-catalogue.html

The GeoNB tool, I think, shows the same coverage for the refuge: https://geonb.snb.ca/geonb/

Don't know if
breau (2026-02-15 11:49:13+00:00): Don't know if GNB has someone to contact for these kind of updates...