piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-01-19 18:04:12+00:00): Tere,
Aitäh panuse eest. Siin on aga probleem - neid parkimiskohti sa lisasid autode järgi, aga tuleb lisada teemärgistuse järgi. Seal kus teemärgistust ei ole neid lisada ei ole vaja - autod võivad seista seal teisiti. Ja isegi siin on näha et nad blokeerivad üksteist.

Kas ma saan küsida mis üldse toimub? Kas see on mingi kooliülesanne või miks järsku nii palju uusi inimesi lisab parkimiskohti?

Hello, 
Thanks for your contribution! But there is a problem here - single parking spaces should be added by road markings, not by cars which you see on aerial photos. Cars may park differently on a different day and here you can even see that they block each other.

Can I ask you what's going on? So many new people suddenly map parking spaces. Is that a school assignment or something?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:30:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:49:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:08:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Linkid (2023-08-17 13:22:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for your contribution.
This charging station is a one node of a group of stations. The group represents the global charging station, with 10 stations in fact. This group is splitted in 2 relations (Est and Ouest), as it is on the Ionity website.
I'm reverting this changeset as there is a mix-up between a node and a relation.
NorthCrab (2023-01-24 06:55:46+00:00): I believe "xyz wood" is not a real tag and thus deleted it. Feel free to discuss with me if you feel otherwise.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-31 03:41:41+00:00): User blocked & all Changesets reverted by DWG for vandalism: changeset/131903536
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:40:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
kucai (2023-07-22 08:25:22+00:00): Where do you get the street names from?
rene78 (2023-07-22 10:45:58+00:00): Don't remember. I suppose from the Publika website or some other Google search.
kucai (2023-07-22 15:38:03+00:00): Right. If I could reference to google, I woulda completed mapping my whole country quite a while ago.
CurlingMan13 (2023-01-19 15:40:21+00:00): It's already mapped here, so you created a duplicate.  I went ahead and merged the features.
Jakka (2023-01-19 15:08:16+00:00): Is men nog aan bouwen dan
building=construction
construction=* (apartments,house,..)
Jan Vleugels (2023-01-19 15:24:48+00:00): ik woon er toch al :-)
Jakka (2023-01-19 15:27:00+00:00): dan is de tag contruction=residential  overbodig.
Jakka (2023-01-19 15:29:26+00:00): is er een betere omschrijving voor dit grote gebouw
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
Jakka (2023-01-19 15:32:34+00:00): Dit lijkt ook geen gesloten dak zie een opening binnenkoer/plein ?
Jan Vleugels (2023-01-20 09:58:58+00:00): idd, er is ook een binnenkoer.   Weet alleen niet goed hoe dat te tekenen
Jakka (2023-01-20 13:29:01+00:00): Is ingetekend. links en rechts kleine oppervlaktes waarschijnlijk overdekte "bewoonde" doorgangen welk verkeer ?
Jan Vleugels (2023-01-20 13:46:00+00:00): enkel voetgangers
datendelphin (2023-01-23 19:38:03+00:00): Hallo Godar27 und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Danke für das eintragen des Coiffeurs. Die öffnungszeiten brauchen ein bestimmtes Format, damit sie maschinenlesbar sind. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours 
Und es macht durchaus Sinn, den Punkt im Haus zu platzieren, wie du das anfänglich gemacht hast. 
Grüsse 
Michael
Godar27 (2023-01-25 10:58:27+00:00): Hallo Michael

Danke für die Antwort. Habe die Öffnungszeiten nun als Text eingegeben. Die Öffnungszeiten sind nicht immer regelmässig und deshalb als Text notiert.
Standort habe ich ebenfalls wieder ins Haus verschoben.

Grüsse
Godar27
datendelphin (2023-01-25 11:03:15+00:00): Ach so, kleines Missverständnis. Ich hatte die Öffnungszeiten dem Format angepasst. Man kann durchaus Einschränkungen wie "nur nach Terminvereinbarung" als Text eingeben. Das wichtige war, die Wochentage auf Englisch zu schreiben, und die Einschränkung in Anführungszeichen.
Godar27 (2023-02-01 14:43:14+00:00): Oh. Jetzt hab ichs geschnallt und wieder zurück geändert. Sollte nun hoffentlich alles i.O. sein.
Dinamik (2023-01-21 22:20:41+00:00): Здравствуйте! Тег addr:housename используется для указания названий, которые являются частью адреса здания. В данном случае адресом является Петровский проспект, дом 14, а не "ЖК "На Петровском". В России, вероятно, addr:housename нигде не может быть применён, т. к. адресация с названиями домов вместо номеров домов не применяется.
aTarom (2023-01-19 14:11:05+00:00): Hola Ivan Caparros,
gracias por editar, en la etiqueta de "image"
tiene un límite de caracteres, cuando se excede la url queda recortada y evidentemente da error
creo que colocando solo el website es suficiente y allí ya se ven las imágenes

Saludos
Iván Caparrós (2023-01-19 15:15:12+00:00): Hola aTarom, buenas tardes.

Muchas gracias por comunicar la limitación de caracteres. Lo desconocía. Lo tengo en cuenta para próximas ediciones... o lo omito como tú bien indicas.

Saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:13:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:14:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:08:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:38:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Gonéo (2023-01-22 20:30:58+00:00): Attention le magasin est au milieu de la rue (et n'est donc pas visible). ll faudrait utiliser un point à l'intérieur du bâtiment, comme la pharmacie d'à côté ou LCL un peu plus loin.
Si vous avez besoin d'aide n'hésitez pas à demander.
gscholz (2023-01-20 06:48:19+00:00): HI RKausar,
your recent changesets have created several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways like this one here:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=32.86090&lat=3.48553&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131468639

This kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?

May be you can also improve your editing style to avoid such errors.
Kind regards
Guido
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:10:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:45:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Branko Kokanovic (2023-01-21 18:06:24+00:00): These are not duplicated boundaries, it is per official cadastre. Please don't deduplicate them:) I will revert this one
NorthCrab (2023-01-20 08:42:32+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Dodane przez ciebie godziny otwarcia, są nieprawidłowe. Proszę przeczytaj dokumentację na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening%20hours. Pozdrawiam!
Langlaeufer (2023-01-19 15:11:43+00:00): Hallo qord,

mit designated wird nicht die Benutzungspflicht eines Radweges ausgedrückt, sondern ob es sich um einen offiziellen Radweg handelt. Das ist hier der Fall (nicht-benutzungspfichtiger Radweg) und wird durch das alleinstehende Schild "Radverkehr frei" zum Ausdruck gebracht. Siehe Diskussion: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=76290

Grüße
Frank aka Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131468872
qord (2023-01-19 16:04:01+00:00): OK habe ich gelesen (und leichten Hirnschmerz jetzt) aber ich nehme aus der Diskussion mit, dass die Wege bei *nur* Zeichen "Radfahrer frei" "designated" sind und bei der Kombi Gehweg + Radfahrer frei ein "yes" gesetzt wird?
Hatte tatsächlich die Unterschiedung nicht auf dem Schirm und mir ein Z239 "dazugedacht". Aber ich schaue noch mal vor Ort nach, ob sich da was geändert hat...
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:18:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:32:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:07:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:40:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
ragit (2023-03-31 22:09:47+00:00): Should we add the outline of the planned Lynetteholmen, as seen on this image?

https://www.lynetteholmen.com/uploads/8a02673e-fab3-4007-8d9b-7842f48569df/lynetteholmen-luftfoto.jpg

From: https://www.lynetteholmen.com/

The tag could be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:proposed%3Dresidential

See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed
user_177389 (2023-04-01 05:49:35+00:00): hello ragit,

the proposal refers to streets, not areas.

I would only draw planned things when they have been completed, a lot can change before then.

Greetings,
Mario
ragit (2023-04-01 10:20:16+00:00): Hi Mario,

Thanks, but it says "We may therefore wish to show planned roads, railways, routes (airports, other features...) on the map". Or are you referring to something else?

Regardless, it's a planned, major change to the physical world, and since the purpose of a map is to give a visual representation of the physical world, it is an eligible entity fit for getting mapped.

Since the building has begun, as can be seen if you visit the place, the project and the plan is in progress, and it would be nice to get a feeling for the end result, by putting it on the map, even if it is only an approximation.

I look forward to hear your opinion.

Cheers,
Ragit
ragit (2023-04-01 10:21:47+00:00): ... and I do agree, things can change.

But then we just update the rough outline, right?
user_177389 (2023-04-01 11:07:26+00:00): Hello Ragit,

of course, I can't dictate to anyone what they can map. A principle at OSM, however, is to only enter what can be found on site. There are also no two versions of the map at the same time - the actual version and the version as it will look in the future...

Especially on Refshaleøen the differences are very big. However, there are too many sensitive objects such as the coastline and the boundary/multipolygon relations involved that must not be faulty. If a repair is necessary, that person must also be able to understand the status -> access to the current status (e.g. via license-compliant background image).

Greetings,
Mario
ragit (2023-04-01 11:31:23+00:00): Thanks for clarifying Mario. I understand now, that it is not as easy as I was hoping for ... Maybe in the future, this feature of outlining major planned projects will become part of OSM ... maybe as an overlay? Anyway, have a nice day, and thanks a lot for working on OSM.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:18:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
eggie (2023-01-19 17:42:30+00:00): Dag Sansan...   Dit was een officiële adresnode (import kadaster)  Het adres zal denk ik nog bestaan. 
Ik hersteld even wat.
MVG
eggie
Sansan H (2023-01-20 13:00:31+00:00): Oke, ja, snap het. Ik had alleen de 'invluiing' van het punt moeten weghalen, niet de punt zelf. Bedankt voor het meekijken.
JJIglesias (2023-01-19 20:51:24+00:00): Slds. Ya usted mismo lo agrego, su empresa aparecera en la proxima actualizacion en las aplicaciones OSMAND, Maps.me, Organic Maps, Guru, Facebook y otras.

Le sugiero q si puede coloque el telefono de contacto con las etiquetas phone= o contact:mobile=

Muchas gracias y Saludos
JJ
JJIglesias (2023-01-19 20:55:35+00:00): Por cierto desde cualquiera de esas aplicaciones puede agregar puntos de interes, directamente al mapa. Gracias
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:53:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:58:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:09:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:28:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:02:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:05:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:13:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
literan (2023-01-19 19:54:17+00:00): мне кажется, перепутали description с inscription
solenoid jam (2023-01-20 07:40:47+00:00): точно. поправим
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:30:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
starsep (2023-01-21 12:33:43+00:00): Przy dzieleniu dróg proszę zwróć uwagę na trasy autobusowe
:-} (2023-01-21 13:46:05+00:00): Ok
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:22:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:55:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:38:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Gonéo (2023-01-22 20:42:22+00:00): Attention, il est important que la piste cyclable soit connectée aux rues, sinon les GPS routeurs ne sauront pas l'utiliser. Il faut bien rejoindre l'axe de la rue (le `way` même si c'est virtuel). Idem pour les rues latérales, quitte à ajouter 2 mètre de connexion virtuelle. J'ai fait la correction au sud et au nord. Par contre il y a un morceau de piste rue de St-Exupéry qui ne semble pas connecté à la rue et ne sera pas utilisé. Peut-être souhaitez vous le corriger. N'hésitez pas à demander de l'aide si besoin.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133493408
pio2_122 (2023-01-19 15:31:21+00:00): Dlaczego nazwa została okrojona w ten sposób?
W OSM przyjęło się, że używa się pełnych nazwy urzędów miast, gmin, itd.
lukbas (2023-01-19 16:39:33+00:00): Tak, o ile nie jest jednoznaczna lub inna jest pisownia miasta w adresie. Są też wyjątki dla UM w aglomeracjach i miasta tytularne, np: Stołeczne, Główne, itd.
lukbas (2023-01-19 16:46:38+00:00): Co do urzędu gminy pełna zgoda. Te określają kilka miejscowości i adres często nie jest tożsamy z nazwą gminy.
pio2_122 (2023-01-19 16:47:03+00:00): Jakie jest źródło takiego sposobu nazewnictwa?

Na dobrą sprawę nazwa "Urząd Miasta" bezpośrednio dubluje informację zawartą w tagu amenity=townhall, więc nie powinno się jej stosować, ponieważ jest to wyłącznie opis a nie nazwa (tak jak nie dodaje się np. name=łakwa do amenity=bench)
lukbas (2023-01-19 17:10:30+00:00): To zasada ograniczania zbędnych danych. Zapis nie jest dublowany ponieważ OSM jest projektem otwartym i można korzystać z mapy bez zalogowania i wtedy nie widzimy tagu. Symbol UM nie jest jednoznaczny. W wyszukiwarce OSM Urząd Miasta Szczecinek jest jednoznaczny. Nagminnie userzy wpisują w nazwę szkoły nazwę miasta, która nie tylko jest zbędna ale i zaciemnia mapę przez nadmiar danych.