piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gendy54 (2026-04-28 21:38:03+00:00): Idem pour node 11978267825 qui a été écrasé de police municipale à gendarmerie
synthfi (2026-03-09 18:18:40+00:00): also moved bus stops to be on the footpaths, or connected them
mueschel (2026-03-13 13:25:46+00:00): Hi, 
what does 'access:motorcar:left' mean? This tag isn't used in other places. Maybe motorcar:backward or parking:left:motorcar could be right.


https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/189067571
Trần Thanh Tuấn (2026-03-15 05:03:42+00:00): I’ll fix this sometime soon.
ajmat (2026-03-10 11:45:43+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 179634304
Szymson (2026-03-09 19:15:46+00:00): Zgłaszam pewną obiekcję co do nazwy. W tym przybytku stacjonują również trolejbusy. Należałoby przywrócić samo "Zajezdnia" albo z "autobusowa" zrobić "autobusowo-trolejbusowa".
stasiu512 (2026-03-09 20:14:01+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za uwagę. Faktycznie trolejbusy stacjonują na strzeżonej pętli. Poprawiłem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179602848
Frans S (2026-03-10 09:17:18+00:00): Hello. 
A remark. Please zoom in rather far to be able to draw the rooflines accurately. Now you oversize the buildings you map.
Realize that most roofs have an overhang, so the actual building is smaller.
NeisBot (2026-03-09 18:46:38+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11358720609 v7

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dance Academy"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-10 06:51:15+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-06 08:28:58+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tags for POI in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185182679
Frans S (2026-03-10 09:09:05+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------

Issues found on your mappings
A: Inaccurate mapping. 
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.
G: Included the shadow of the building.

Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179600060
chinook17 (2026-07-13 02:46:28+00:00): Bonjour,
Il faut faire attention de ne pas dédoubler les bandes cyclables par des pistes cyclables en highway cycleway.
bartgron (2026-03-10 21:12:37+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Frans S (2026-03-10 08:44:29+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Accurately mapped. However, not all buildings are squared. Each rectangular building needs to be squared with the Q key while selected.
Best regards.
NeisBot (2026-03-09 19:09:56+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13630335991 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Gym"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-18 05:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180039140
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
george1201 (2026-03-17 23:46:42+00:00): Welchen Sinn macht "access:conditional"="no @ (Jan 10 - Jun 30)" ohne die Angabe eines Jahres? Bedeutet es, dass jedes Jahr von Januar bis Juni der Durchgang bzw. die Durchfahrt nicht möglich ist?
Nakaner (2026-03-20 22:39:13+00:00): Ich werde die Sperrung Anfang Juli (Beginn nächste Bauphase) löschen. Die Syntax ohne Jahreszahl wird besser unterstützt (z.B. von GraphHopper, dort optinales Features und bezieht sich auf den Zeitpunkt des Imports).
bartgron (2026-03-10 21:12:51+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
bartgron (2026-03-10 21:12:58+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
bartgron (2026-03-10 21:13:07+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
grzegorz75jan (2026-03-09 21:38:36+00:00): Jak długo zamierzasz stosować do każdego zestawu zmian pseudo opis

"asd"

Możesz wyjaśnić co to ma komuś mówić o twoich edycjach.

https://youtu.be/xBMIoypkdI4?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5&t=2596
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179601019
iandees (2026-03-09 19:28:50+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
eggie (2026-03-09 19:41:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-03-09 19:25:27+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13556651556 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Lawn equipment store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-18 05:33:05+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180039141
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
Edelsalami (2026-03-09 22:27:17+00:00): Hallo even666, kannst du bitte erläutern warum du immer wieder die Umrisse von Wohngebieten veränderst, so dass diese Flächen einschließen, die kein Wohngebiet sind? Auch will sich mir nicht erschließen, warum du eine Baustelle als "Garten" gemappt hast. Warum ist das aus deiner Sicht gerechtfertigt oder richtig? Danke. Gruß
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-27 18:09:01+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5983716884/history has building = demolished that was added in this edit
building=demolished ? Is this building really gone? In that case it should be deleted or retagged to demolished:building=yes.

Note that building tag describes purpose of the building - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building and remains of buildings must not be mapped as buildings
kadiwa (2026-03-10 19:59:49+00:00): Hallo sugitokudan,
Ladestationen in OSM sind nicht Äquivalent zu einer einzelnen Ladesäule. Mehrere nebeneinander platzierte Ladesäulen werden durch eine amenity=charging_station dargestellt. Für einzelne Ladesäulen kann man dann Nodes mit man_made=charge_point erstellen, falls man ins Detailsmapping gehen will.
sugitokudan (2026-03-11 18:45:05+00:00): Ok, hab die beiden Säulen wieder zusammengefasst.
kadiwa (2026-03-12 13:14:14+00:00): Dankeschön!
NeisBot (2026-03-09 19:45:49+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 83 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/866062334 v5 | 26 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1188169325 v1 | 29 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1188169327 v1 | 28 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/11033272507 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179601756
iandees (2026-03-09 19:48:53+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
jmast (2026-03-09 20:04:06+00:00): Hi! Thanks for the heads-up and fixing that accidental node-move. I will be more careful in the future!
NeisBot (2026-03-09 19:57:51+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 32 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1486981394 v1 | 13 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1486981393 v1 | 10 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1486981396 v1 | 6 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179602285
bartgron (2026-03-10 08:40:55+00:00): Zestaw zmian został wycofany, obiekty zostały dodane niedbale i bezsensownie.
Proszę przy ponownym dodaniu obiektów o przestrzeganie zasad OSM oraz zasad logiki.
Pozdrawiam
NeisBot (2026-03-09 20:01:18+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13630872523 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Sign company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-18 05:33:08+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180039146
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Frans S (2026-03-11 14:09:32+00:00): Hallo Koos.
Leuk om je hier weer tegen te komen.
Weet je dat je in een gang een weg kan taggen, inclusief de surface tag ?
In de plug in Fast draw configuration kun je de term
"highway=unclassified surface=unpaved"
toevoegen. 
In deze omgeving zijn uitgezonderd de hoofdwegen vrijwel alle wegen onverhard.
Vriendelijke groeten.
NeisBot (2026-03-09 20:01:30+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13630839188 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bar and grill"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-18 05:33:11+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180039147
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
HashFerret (2026-03-14 09:07:39+00:00): Hi Erich, just wanted to say everything looks great on this. Also just as a general heads up if you're wanting to map more houses, the national address database can save you the trouble of surveying individual addresses. (mainly want to point that out since I wasted a hot afternoon a few years ago noting them by hand.)
NeisBot (2026-03-09 20:10:17+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13546775020 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "cabinet store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-18 05:33:11+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180039148
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
NeisBot (2026-03-09 20:22:17+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13556556697 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Boot store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-18 05:33:13+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180039150
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
iandees (2026-03-09 21:11:43+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
VLD277 (2026-03-09 22:19:08+00:00): Hello iandees, 

Thank you for catching my mistake here. I made one additional update to make sure the crossing is returned to the correct position as well. Changeset # 179606834


Thanks and happy mapping, VLD277
NeisBot (2026-03-09 20:55:30+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13556654116 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Fashion boutique"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-18 05:33:14+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180039151
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
SimonPoole (2026-03-09 20:54:40+00:00): Leimbach naturally.
DwarfNebula_ (2026-03-10 00:17:07+00:00): Hi Remlicht,

Waarom heb je deze paden aangepast? Je werk met verouderde satellietbeelden (van een jaar geleden).  Inmiddels ziet er het anders uit: https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.08686,5.167691,19/?datastrip=20260208_SVNEO-01&sensorname=SuperView-NEO

Zou je een revert kunnen doen op deze changeset? Als je niet weet hoe dat moet, wil ik dat ook wel voor je doen.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Jasper
Remlicht89 (2026-03-10 04:11:17+00:00): Excuses, ik had even moeten kijken naar de datum van de laatste aanpassing. Revert uitgevoerd.

De huidige paden kwamen toevalligerwijs redelijk overeen met de nog oudere situatie (toen dit nog een kantoorpand en parkeerplaats was), waardoor ik er vanuit ging dat dit nog niet was aangepast.

"Assumption is the mother of all f*ck ups".

Bedankt voor het melden.
Sylabowy Kot (2026-03-10 21:22:18+00:00): Dach budynku A nie chce się renderować w F4Map. Jak otagować poprawnie sytuację, gdy kondygnacje dachowe określane są więcej niż jednym obszarem?
jayaddison (2026-03-10 14:43:49+00:00): Hello - thanks for caring about highlighting information for users; however I think this may be a care where we should not map for a specific renderer: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer

Have you followed/reported bugthreads in the OrganicMaps app about this?
Railwayfan2005 (2026-03-10 19:23:56+00:00): Setting the area tag seems to be necessary when converting platforms just drawn as lines to areas. Without this they don't seem to be included in the same extracts that platforms drawn as polygons. Organic maps is just one consumer of these extracts that is improved by ensuring the area tag is set.
jayaddison (2026-03-11 00:23:03+00:00): Ok.  I'm not 100% certain, but I believe that Organic Maps has recently added an -- unreleased -- feature to enable display of public_transport=platform as lines on the map: https://github.com/organicmaps/organicmaps/pull/12245

Similarly, comaps has a feature request for this open: https://codeberg.org/comaps/comaps/issues/3482
MappingMore (2026-03-10 07:39:10+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179622889 ; 179556909
ajmat (2026-03-10 08:57:03+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 179557083, 179625711
woodpeck (2026-03-13 20:11:32+00:00): Hallo Hb-, bitte versuche doch, aussagekräftigere Changeset-Kommentare zu benutzen. "DE,NI,BS" ist unnötig; man sieht das an Deinem Edit auch so, wo der ist. "BAB 282 Okerbrücke2 relation/10664300" ist unklar. Was hast Du hier geändert? Versuche künftig, das deutlich zu schreiben.
Hb- (2026-03-14 02:55:28+00:00): Dank "DE,Ni,BS" ist bereits von außen klar, welche Region betroffen ist – ohne den Changeset öffnen zu müssen. Ich finde das super übersichtlich.

"BAB 282 Okerbrücke2" bezeichnet das Hauptobjekt. Grundlage ist der erfolgreiche changeset/179604790. Zuvor waren die zwei changeset/179596057 und changeset/179591313 gescheitert. 

Dabei war versucht worden, alle geänderten Daten in einem Zuge hoch zu laden. Ergebnis waren timeout/Nichterreichbarkeits-Fehlermeldungen des Servers. Ursache dürfte das Dutzend übergroße Relationen mit teilweise über 7.000 Elementen gewesen sein. 

Also wurden zunächst die grundlegenden Änderungen an Knoten und Wege hochgeladen. Danach dann in fünfzehn weiteren Schritten von changeset/179604855 bis changeset/179608536 die problematischen Relationen einzeln.

So erklärt sich dieser Kommentar. Hierin wurde die relation/10664300 durch das Entfernen eines Weges geändert.
A67-A67 (2026-03-15 16:38:37+00:00): In deze wijziging wordt de naam ALDI foutief naar Aldi aangepast. ALDI wordt in Nederland met hoofdletters geschreven, ook in geschreven tekst. De suggesties in de iD-editor zijn niet meer dan suggesties, het zijn geen foutmeldingen en vaak kloppen ze niet.

Ik heb het verbeterd.
Wildsharky (2026-03-11 12:21:03+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 179628652
catonano (2026-03-18 20:16:33+00:00): 👍
MappingMore (2026-03-12 12:03:51+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179754479
Frans S (2026-03-10 08:41:33+00:00): Hi Norbert. I noticed that you changed the tagging of throughgoing traces from unclassified into track. 
Most of the traces connects settlements and depending on the width, I tag them as path or unclassified. ( residential is more for roads in villages and bigger)
for me this wiki is leading
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines

What is your opinion ? 
Best regards
Norbert Dichter (2026-03-10 10:08:57+00:00): You are correct, I did something wrong, maybe selected it in the task's border, and that went wrong. Would you please revert.
With kind regards, Nodi
Zrop (2026-03-10 13:17:24+00:00): Hallo Fritz1204,
aus welchem Grund verkürzt Du hier die Wege ? Die Wege, wie z.B https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20308019 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20307997, gehen doch bis zu den Garagen.
Und aus welchem Grund unterbrichst Du die Verbindung der Wege https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1486354341 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1486354343 zum Zufahrtsweg ?

Gruß
Zrop
rskedgell (2026-03-10 13:46:31+00:00): The path is still visible in aerial imagery. What has caused the path to cease to exist - construction work, site redevelopment, addition of a gate/fences, etc.?
jgower (2026-03-10 13:53:37+00:00): It's looks like a private garden, and also there is a fence in the way so even if not private, it wouldn't be possible.
EvanSiroky (2026-03-10 23:26:05+00:00): This is exciting to see you working on rivers! I'm been addicted to improving stuff by looking at https://waterwaymap.org/, but have mainly been focused in California. There's a lot of work to do up in BC, so happy mapping to you!
Tomas09 (2026-07-22 19:59:54+00:00): Remember to use `waterway=flowline` (: I highly doubt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1487017548 is classed as a river
aTarom (2026-03-10 15:46:28+00:00): Hola, parece que le falta la "e" al device
"anti_choking_devic"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13631153473
no lo cambio por que estoy buscando si existe algún equivalente ya en uso
Saludos
aTarom (2026-03-11 17:23:46+00:00): Añado la "e", saludos.
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2026-03-11 21:34:26+00:00): Gracias, saludos
あじさか (2026-03-10 14:18:37+00:00): I have partially reverted some geometry changes in this changeset because existing mapped features were moved to match unaligned Bing imagery.

Revert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179641426
LarsBG (2026-07-26 16:00:37+00:00): Hej Niels

Er der hvordan kan noget være på level=1.5 ?

Og nogle på på level=2 ?

Og hvis vi ikke ved hvor man_made=charge_point præsic er. Så syntes jeg det er bedre de ikke er der. Men så følgelig beholder amenity=charging_station

Hvad syntes du ?
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2026-07-26 17:58:12+00:00): Jeg kan heller ikke se ideen med at beholde charge_point, vi ikke ved hvor er.

Jeg ved ikke helt hvad det er for objekter med level=1.5, du mener.
Wikien omtaler en diskussion om fraktionelle værdier fx på trappeafsatser, og mezzaniner. Men der er nogle parkeringshuseplatforme som har level=1.5. Muligvis er de forskudt fra elevatorstop. 
  Men så burde elevatoren måske tagges som fx: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11756978660
Under alle omstændigheder, hvis parkeringsetagen har level=1.5 så bør charge_point på parkeringsetagen også have level=1.5. Men man kunne starte med at retagge parkeringsetagerne.
LarsBG (2026-07-26 18:36:14+00:00): Tak for feedback. Jeg har skrevet med @jbohmdk i https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186407616#map=19/55.723307/12.439827&layers=N
BikePC (2026-03-10 10:32:38+00:00): Typfoutje? Zie het officiele besluit waarnaar je verwijst.
BikePC (2026-03-10 10:34:57+00:00): Meer naar het noorden: Moet 'Flessenpad' dan ook niet 'Bleiswijkse Flespadf' heten?
BikePC (2026-03-10 10:37:59+00:00): Sorry, de cache was nog niet ververst. Het Bleiswijkse Flespad loopt door tot aan de tunnel onder de A12.
MappingMore (2026-03-11 09:13:43+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179682160
keithonearth (2026-03-10 02:42:17+00:00): It's probably better to try to avoid changesets that are half the width of the western hemisphere.