piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 17:51:59+00:00): Hi Danica, you identified buildings in imagery, but the footprints could be more accurate. 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners (q), or circularise them (o), because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely by hand. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, you can right click for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size that may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough else shapes will not completely square. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
opendcc (2025-09-12 15:19:13+00:00): Hallo, hier werden kleine Siedlungen (die als hamlet zu taggen sind) zu villages hochgestuft - flächendeckend. Und das Ganze noch mit einem unverfängliche CS-Kommentar Update Wikidata. 
A) Warum änderst Du da auf village?
B) könnst Du bitte bessere Changeset-Comment machen?
Michael Spitzenberger (2025-09-13 07:38:09+00:00): Hallo, ich habe mich ganz auf Wikipedia verlassen, siehe z.B. hier https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Orte_im_Landkreis_Passau
opendcc (2025-09-13 11:18:33+00:00): Das mag für wikipedia gelten, OSM hat andere Regeln, wobei diese nicht extrem hart zu werten sind. Es kann eine kleine Siedlung z.B. regional bedeutend sein, da muss man abwägen. Was aber auf keinen Fall geht, einfach flächendeckend kleine hamlets auf village hochzustufen. Ich finde _sehr viele_ solche unbegründbaren Umstufungen. Bitte hier die eigenen Edit nochmal kritisch nachbearbeiten, danke.
bartgron (2025-09-10 21:14:39+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Oprócz tego nie ma sensu podawania do publicznej wiadomości dokładnego miejsca swojego zamieszkania
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 17:49:08+00:00): Hi Flavia, you identified buildings in the imagery and mapped most of them quite well but there are a couple with rather unique shapes that should be square. 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Zoom in and out to aid your interpretation. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
bartgron (2025-09-10 21:16:29+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
chrisble (2025-09-10 17:46:06+00:00): please add: #MissingMaps_DRK #redcross #MissingMapsMSF #MSFGermany
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 18:03:49+00:00): If I understand you correctly then please add these hashtags to your changeset comment when you save/upload to keep track of the mapathon stats. It is not reasonable to apply them to the project as a whole becasue there is much activity not associated with the mapathon. Also the vast majority of footprints here are accurately mapped, just remember to exclude the shadow from the footprint's size.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171748419
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 18:05:28+00:00): Hi, you identified buildings here but the footprints you mapped are not as accurarte as they could be and the footprints should have been squared. 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners (q), or circularise them (o), because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely by hand. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, you can right click for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size that may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough else shapes will not completely square. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
bartgron (2025-09-10 21:16:44+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 18:08:21+00:00): The footprints here are generally valid but a good proportion are oversized and include the building's shadow in the footprint's size.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 18:15:31+00:00): The footprints you mapped here are generally valid and accurate, consider mapping them slightly smaller than the roof. See how I mapped a couple of the buildings here in Changeset: 171749837
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171748513
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 18:22:42+00:00): See how I mapped some of the footprints here in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171750127 Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171748546
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 18:24:43+00:00): The footprintd you added here are all valid and quite accurate. The shapes are correct but they tend to be oversized. Try mapping the footpritns slightly smaller than the roof you see in the imagery. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171748547
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-10 18:32:19+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13134619695

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bartgron (2025-09-10 21:17:17+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 18:26:19+00:00): Good job spotting these footprints! Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171748571
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 18:33:32+00:00): This looks like an improvement from your previous contributions. Some of these building footprints are very accurate and I could not have mapped them better myself. Others are slightly oversized or have needlessly complex shapes. 

Try mapping footprints slightly smaller than the roof you see in the imagery. Check if a simple shape accurately represents a building before choosing a more complex one. You can use backspace when tracing lines and areas to undo the placement of the previous node without having to draw fom scratch.

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171748587
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 18:35:38+00:00): Hi all of the footpritns you mapped represent buildings though some are slightly oversized.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 18:41:34+00:00): The vast majority of footprints you mapped here are valid however one may be enveloping two buildings and another may infact represent a barrier like a fence or wall (I flagged these). Otherwise remember to square footpritns when appropriate. 

Sometimes features are obscured by others in imagery e.g. tall buildings, vegetation, shadows, or clouds. Sometimes using another imagery source in these instances can allow you to view the feature of interest directly. Our goal is to map the ground truth accurately, so if the feature is obscured in all available sources, then use what you can see (and other map data) to estimate its shape, size, position and orientation. Think about what space is already occupied by other features e.g. Consider where a tree's trunk meets the ground.

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners (q), or circularise them (o), because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely by hand. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, you can right click for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size that may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough else shapes will not completely square. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.
eggie (2025-09-10 18:07:19+00:00): reverted due to vandalism Wijzigingenset #171749548
silversurfer83 (2025-09-10 18:26:16+00:00): Moin Frank,

warum erzeugst du hier zwei identische nodes für das gleiche Objekt?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171749048
Frank Hein 666 (2025-09-10 20:46:11+00:00): Hi,
ich komme mit dem Programm irgendwie nicht parat. Habe es heute zum ersten mal ausprobiert, weil viele Wege in meiner Heimat auf Openstreetmap noch nicht eingetragen sind und habe die Punkte versehentlich hochgeladen. An dieser Stelle ist eine Schützenhalle. Aber so wie das jetzt dargestellt ist war das nicht gewollt. Ich weiß nicht mal was Nodes (Knoten) bedeuten soll. Sorry. 
Gruß 
Frank
eggie (2025-09-10 18:06:06+00:00): reverted due to vandalism Wijzigingenset #171749476
eggie (2025-09-10 18:05:06+00:00): reverted
OddlyAngled (2025-09-21 13:42:02+00:00): it is helpful when the change description is more descriptive - a summary of what has been changed. this aids the community when reviewing. please consider this in the future, thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171749142
Yunkers (2025-09-10 19:41:38+00:00): Zmieniłem też tagowanie cpru tylko zapomniałem dopisać do komentarza :/
eggie (2025-09-10 18:04:37+00:00): reverted due to vandalism by #171749375
user_5359 (2025-09-11 07:35:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I assume you want to map the layout of the church. The standard procedure for this is called indoor mapping and is described in the wiki at https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging. Could you please adjust your change accordingly?
NeisBot (2025-09-10 21:46:23+00:00): Hi Stefanoesmeris, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Geometry adjustment"
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-10-22 18:47:48+00:00): Okulun sınırları içine(okulun sınırlarını da siz çizmişsiniz way/1422641254) bir motorsiklet tamircisi(way/1422641258) eklemişsiniz. Bunu yanlışlıkla mı eklediniz?
marmara_editor (2025-09-10 21:08:11+00:00): Geri alındı. Bu yol mevcutta sadece birkaç mahalleye hizmet ediyor. Çevreyolunun yapılması durumunda primary kategorisine alınabilir lakin şu anda buna gerek yok.
Negreheb (2025-09-11 08:09:12+00:00): Servus, schön, dass ihr mitmacht. Warum habt ihr denn hier den building=yes tag gelöscht? :)

Alles gute
palamito (2025-09-11 22:53:42+00:00): Hola buenas TxShiroxT, bienvenidos al entorno OSM

Que bueno que te hayas motivado a editar el mapa para hacerlo más completo, aunque estás seguro que en esa ubicación ya la línea de taxi no está presente? Lo malo es que no hay como tal una forma de contactarlos directamente para saber si utilizan esa parte de la acera o no

Saludos y lo invito a formar parte de los canales de OSM Venezuela ya sea en el foro o el telegram
TxShiroxT (2025-09-12 02:30:57+00:00): Saludos, estoy seguro, era una parada informal que ocupaban el espacio legitimo de metrobus y buses de paso, estacionaban en rayado rojo. 
Los buses de valle/coche le arrebataron el punto, y esta en tema legal ahora ellos
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 18:56:23+00:00): The footpritns you added here all appear valid but some are oversized. 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 18:53:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! some of the footprints you added are very accurate and I could not have done a better job myself, others however are oversized and are not squared when they should be. 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners (q), or circularise them (o), because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely by hand. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, you can right click for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size that may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough else shapes will not completely square. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 18:49:20+00:00): The vast majority of building footprints you mapped here are really accurate.  Remember to exclude the shadow a building casts from its footprint shape and map the footprint slightly smaller than the roof you see in imagery. Good job on improving the shape of the footprint you mapped earlier. You can press backspace to undo the placement of nodes when mapping lines and areas, or select and move the nodes after tagging,  without having to re draw the whole thing. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171750725
s777n (2025-09-10 19:34:21+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы рисуете по спутниковым снимкам бинг. Они очень старые и в большинтсве случае какие-то другие снимки будут более новыми. Например снимки Esri - Чтобы поменять слой справа есть кнопка настройки фонового изображения (иконка с "тремя листами"). 

Класс дороги. Проезды во дворах это или "Улица со знаком 5.21" или "служебная дорога". Когда вы выбираете тип  дороги то нажмите на знак i рядом с текстом (Например "служебная дорога") и там появится описание. Но лучше сразу читать wiki - там будет описано лучше.

Поправил и немного подвинул дороги.
citrula (2025-09-10 23:22:18+00:00): This wouldn't allow the left turn since the eastbound segment of sandy creek is one-way. I fixed the geometry for you
Buttons Cheely (2025-09-11 11:05:25+00:00): Thank you for your help.  Do I need to do anything else?
citrula (2025-09-11 18:38:34+00:00): don't think so - turning left at that entrance works fine in OSRM now.