piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-16 09:58:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10706576115/history - is it entire cemetery or a single grave?

what you mean by fee=yes on a grave?
Scout Jens (2023-03-03 10:54:32+00:00): Nach Besichtigung vor Ort gestern
berndw (2023-03-03 10:55:59+00:00): Eich, nicht Wassenach ;-)
flohoff (2023-03-06 21:38:29+00:00): Hey,
schön das du mit mappst. Wenn du mehr mit Gebäuden machen willst dann solltest du dir den ALKIS Layer ansehen. Da sind die offiziellen Gebäudeoutlines drin. Mit dem Luftbild kriegt man die meist nicht richtig hin,

Und wenn du dann noch mehr machen willst solltest du den Editor wechseln. Mit dem JOSM hast du mehr möglichkeiten Gebäudeoutlines automatisiert aus den offiziellen beständen der Verwaltung zu übernehmen. 

So long

Flo
relaemanila (2023-03-03 11:10:08+00:00): Changeset typo: [Orani, Bataan] Extend and improve a construction highway
pitfire (2023-04-11 05:53:33+00:00): Hallo  florian, 
auch wenn Du dort 20 Jahre gelebt hast, hat eine Nutzugsbeschreibung wie, (Triebweg für Kühe)  nichts in der Spalte "Name" zu suchen. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#Namen_sind_keine_Beschreibungen

Namen sind keine Beschreibungen.
Für Beschreibungen verwende bitte description=* und nicht name=*. 

Der Weg wird von keinem Radrouting angesteuert."access=no & private=yes"
"highway=track" passt ebenfalls besser.

Gruß
ivanbranco (2023-04-20 12:19:12+00:00): Hi Jay May,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15552249

this is a hamlet or a village?
Jay May (2023-04-20 14:34:05+00:00): Hello Ivan,
Corrected. Thanks for highlighting this issue
It would be good to draw the missing streets
SekeRob (2023-03-03 18:40:29+00:00): attualmente

parking:both= street_side o lane o half_on_kerb et cet et cet.
+
parking:both:orientation=parallel

detail nel wiki  🖖
DrSpiros (2023-03-03 11:48:48+00:00): ΔΕ Μακρυχωρίου και οχι Γοννων
Dimacn (2023-03-04 17:41:25+00:00): Вы сделали только хуже. Всё стало криво-косо, не на своём месте, с нереальными размерами, с некорректным дублированием названий зданий.
Usadba (2023-03-06 04:20:37+00:00): Я поправила границы. Как раз когда я открыла, там и было все криво-косо. Также убрала лишние дороги. Размеры там реальные. Дублирование названий избежать не получится, так как у одной организации 4 корпуса с разным адресов. Я указала все адреса, причем в правильном варианте, юридическом (без дробей и корпусов, только стр.) Не верите - можете прийти и взглянуть на адресные таблички на каждом корпусе.
Dimacn (2023-03-06 04:47:39+00:00): 1. Вы не выровнили спутниковый снимок по gps трекам, поэтому все перемещённые вами точки оказались не на реальных местах. В т.ч. точки зданий и дорог. 2. изменённая геометрия зданий оказалась нереальных размеров и с непрямыми углами (углы у этих зданий прямые, у вас были нет). Объект типа здание первоначально рисуется (или редактируется) по крыше и потом сдвигается под фундамент. 3. "Усадьбу" рекомендую отметить одной отдельной точкой в границах основного здания.
Usadba (2023-03-06 06:08:13+00:00): В обучении не было ничего про GPS точки, хорошо, я изучу еще раз информацию и подкорректирую с учетом этого в ближайшее время. 
По повод отдельной точки. Это большой торговый центр (комплекс) из нескольких зданий. В нем более 70 арендаторов, поэтому проще как раз было выделить здания, так как арендаторы скоро разместят себя тоже.  Тем более там как раз есть тип "торговый центр".
pesec (2023-03-06 10:10:10+00:00): Добрый день.
Данный пакет правок был отменен по причине большого количества ошибок в геометрии.
Изучите еще раз правила и попробуйте снова.
Dimacn (2023-03-06 14:15:56+00:00): Usadba, арендаторам как раз (т.е. ихним POI) будет больше места для отображения на карте. Можете Усадьбу внести на основное здание (вместо отдельной точки). Также на всю территорию торгового центра можете добавить полигон с тегом landuse=retail  Вот здесь подробно про спутниковые снимки: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Использование_аэрофотоснимков
Patchanka (2023-03-03 13:04:39+00:00): bonjour @00u
Dietplus, je ne pense pas qu'on puisse dire que c'est une clinique !
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dclinic
Je l'avais mis en shop=yes à défaut de quelquechose de plus précis, je pensais que c'était de la vente de compléments alimentaires.
Mais peut être plutôt à mettre comme diététicien ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Comment_cartographier_un_(sant%C3%A9)
00u (2023-03-03 19:40:00+00:00): Bonjour Patchanka!

J'avais mis clinique en pensant que c'était un diététicien, et que je trouvais que c'était le plus précis dans les options de StreetComplete. Mais maintenant que tu m'y fais penser, ce n'est sans doute pas un bon choix. Je croyais à un diététicien, mais l'option compléments alimentaires est possible. Nous pouvons supprimer tout en attendant que je passe devant à pied et je compléterai à ce moment :)
Patchanka (2023-03-04 15:49:51+00:00): bonjour
StreetComplete n'a pas forcément toutes les valeurs possibles. Ce n'est qu'une aide mais attention à ne pas vouloir rentrer "coûte que coûte" dans les choix suggérés.
Pour diététicien, les tags sont (cf wiki) : 
healthcare=counselling
healthcare:counselling=dietitian

Moi j'avais mis shop=yes (on ne fait pas plus vague ! ) car j'avais du passer devant en voiture et donc mettre un truc générique en l'absence de plus d'infos.

Je vais donc mettre les tags de diététicien, qui sont de toute manière plus justes que shop=yes ou amenity=clinic.

Évidemment ça pourra être affiné ensuite.
eggie (2023-03-03 13:13:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback Het pad door het gebouw heb ik aangepast met tunnel=building_passage

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Syl (2023-04-28 12:54:38+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé vos modifications, le chemin a bien l'air d'exister et le gymnase existe déjà plus loin : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314888158
martianfreeloader (2023-03-11 10:42:29+00:00): Hi!

Thanks a lot for your enthusiasm for improving the map. However, in order to avoid doing more harm than good, please start by taking small steps and by doing things you understand. As with many other things, there is a learning curve in OSM and it appears that you're trying to deal with things that you're lacking the necessary experience for. You severely risk putting off other mappers because they feel you're destroying the map, into which they have already put thousands of hours of voluntary work. 

For example:

1) With this changeset, you've mapped a lot of simple sidewalks and traffic islands as pedestrian areas. Have a look at the wiki. This is not what the highway=pedestrian tag is meant for.

2) You've destroyed connections that exist in the real world. For example, after your changes, routing engines cannot anymore route cyclists from Celovška cesta https://www.osm.org/way/1150942759 into Alešovčeva ulica https://www.osm.org/way/867882743 because of changed layout and persisting oneway tags.

Likewise for cyclists riding southbound https://www.osm.org/way/727578804 and wanting to turn into Na jami https://www.osm.org/way/986464720.

3) Before your change, the sidewalk ways were very precisely aligned to a high-resolution aerial imagery. Now, they are not anymore.

4) You’ve mapped a fictional road which is not physically separated from other roads https://www.osm.org/way/1152644580 . In OSM, we don’t map individual lanes (this is done via tags, not by mapping separate ways).


Your motivation and contribution is very much welcome. Eager mappers a desperately needed. But PLEASE PLEASE:

A) Don’t create huge changesets. Nobody will understand your intentions. Make small changesets and give these changesets meaningful comments, so others can understand what you’re trying to do.

B) Do only stuff that you understand.

C) Consult more experienced mappers or, even better, seek advice in the forum, in case you’re uncertain. https://community.openstreetmap.org

D) Keep in mind that OSM data is used for serious real-world applications like routing. A damaged map means that routers that rely on OSM data will deliver wrong results.

E) Run through OSM beginners’ guides and tutorials in order to get a rough idea of the basic workings.

If you have questions, please ask me or other mappers or the community forum https://community.openstreetmap.org. People are more than happy to help!

Happy mapping!
m

(Note that changeset discussions like this one are public)
eggie (2023-03-03 13:16:41+00:00): Dag destaa,  Je vraagt feedback Lijkt me oke zo..
MVG
eggie
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
eggie (2023-03-03 13:18:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-03-03 13:20:47+00:00): Dag Meint... Schuiven met de kaart in editmodus levert vaak schade op door onbedoelde verschuivingen van nodes. Hier adresnodes
Zie https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133251468

Editor iD is daar berucht in.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-03-03 13:31:10+00:00): De adresnode heb ik teruggeplaatst
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-03-03 13:23:43+00:00): Meint  Dit lijkt me niet correct..
Dit is een grens... (
Ondedeel van Multipolygon grens NP Alde Feanen, niet verwijderen!)

Het is geen pad. Ik draai de changeset even terug.
eggie (2023-03-03 13:25:25+00:00): reverted by changeset #133253881
due to wrong interpretation boundary..
No path in this matter.
eggie (2023-03-03 13:26:12+00:00): Vermoedelijk bedoel je het pad dat er vlak naast ligt.
MVG
eggie
MeintMakke (2023-03-03 13:31:02+00:00): ja klopt van it west naar Utein loopt langs deze grens een pad met de naam Fokke Wietske paad
MeintMakke (2023-03-03 13:32:05+00:00): sorry WIetske Hattums paad!
eggie (2023-03-03 13:44:24+00:00): Oke...  maar dat zul je moeten toevoegen aan het pad of de track...

Dus niet aan een grens.

Probeer maar. Ik kijk later wel even of het is gelukt.
Hakuna matata..
eggie
bxl-forever (2023-03-03 13:37:58+00:00): Hello,

Can you please NOT add addresses to objects located within buildings with a single address.

Example here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10700762536/history
It is not necessary to repeat on the restaurant itself that it is on number 904 and on Chaussée de Louvain/Leuvensesteenweg because the information is automatically computed by the database.

It is really painful to have to clean up afterwards, thanks.

Additional tip: in the settings of EveryDoor, be sure to activate "Prefer contact: Prefix", because it is the preferred way to write tags nowadays in Belgium.
GerdP (2023-10-10 07:18:54+00:00): Moin!
Diese Relation scheint ein Überbleibsel der Aufteilung zu sein?
GerdP (2023-10-10 07:19:42+00:00): Link vergessen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15546364
map per (2023-03-03 19:37:16+00:00): Hello tkammasu,

Isn't that rather a driveway?

Best regards
map per
tkammasu (2023-03-06 09:20:32+00:00): Hello map,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and flagging out the issue. I apologize for the incorrect edit. Going forward, I'll ensure to not repeat such errors again and looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
tkammasu
sheldonelectric (2024-12-23 13:56:16+00:00): Καλημέρα ! όταν αλλάζεις όνομα από Greek Cuisine σε Σιτοβολώνας, μπορείς τυφλοσούρτι να αφαιρέσεις το προηγούμενο amenity, cuisine, website κλπ. Προσωπικά αφήνω μόνο το wheelchair, μιας και το σκαλοπάτι είναι το μόνο που παραμένει ίδιο.
0000FF berries (2024-12-31 17:04:37+00:00): Ναι :) Ευχαριστώ για την αλλαγή και την υπενθύμιση :) 

Συνήθως αφαιρώ τις προηγούμενες ετικέτες. Με JOSM/iD δεν έχω θέμα. Με το EveryDoor πρέπει να το θυμηθώ, γιατί δεν δείχνει όλες τις ετικέτες όταν αρχικά επιλέξεις ένα POI :)

Ευχαριστώ και πάλι και χρόνια πολλά :)
LarsKienzel (2023-03-03 13:11:30+00:00): You may want to check the outline of this substation on newer Esri imagery(Clarity), you deleted my edit.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150948993
zluuzki (2023-03-03 14:13:38+00:00): Hello,
actually, Esri Clarity is the oldest imagery. (usually from around 2011-2)
Bing or normal Esri, for example is far newer.

They rebuilt/expanded the substation, the original area which you added is now empty - except the old fence. I re-added it as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150970428
But nonetheless, thank you for adding the substation, even if the outline was slightly outdated.

Greetings
MarcoR (2023-03-28 07:18:54+00:00): Sarebbe stato meglio cercare di lavorare sul processo di esportazione piuttosto che modificare il database.
emersonveenstra (2023-03-04 12:50:30+00:00): Hi,

This changeset duplicated three power pole nodes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10706724301
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10706724302
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10706724300

Can you please fix those? Thanks
hdevine825 (2023-03-05 00:09:20+00:00): It looks like this is no longer a lock smith, but is now a restaurant. In addition, the old phone number is no longer relevant.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133253516
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-07 05:25:25+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145978840
vojtechzaboril (2023-03-06 20:46:58+00:00): The I35 road is definitely not under construction. Stop changing tags as you like!
ACIPasig (2023-03-03 13:27:06+00:00): dzca
Frans S (2023-04-07 10:34:45+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please pay more attention to correct and squared mapping of buildings. Now they are rather inaccurate mapped.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133254062
pitscheplatsch (2023-03-04 11:46:08+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133243414
eggie (2023-03-03 15:08:36+00:00): Hoi...  Volgens mij klopt het wel zo.
Gelijk maar die grafheuvels op de juiste plaats gezet. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-03-03 14:27:54+00:00): Hoi Noah.. In OSM is de codetaal UK English en volgens afgesproken format. Grote_Stenen is dus geen valide tag. Verder even om te onthoduen De combinatie foot=yes met access=no (Verboden Toegang voor iedereen) is bijna altijd fout. 
Wanneer er water is dan is de tag 
ford=stepping_stone
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:ford%3Dstepping_stones

access=no en surface=Grote stenen kan dan weg. 

Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie

MVG
eggie (2023-03-03 14:42:45+00:00): Even als voorbeeld die stenen gemapt.
foot=yes hoeft niet op een voetpad.
literan (2023-03-05 20:26:29+00:00): испортили адрес, название здания. к чему все это?

верну обратно
iandees (2023-03-03 15:43:02+00:00): When mapping buildings, remember to map the footprint of the building, not the roof line. For example, on the houses with attached garages, the building footprint at the ground level does not have a peak, it should be a straight line. Also, when you're mapping buildings you should use the "Q" key to square building corners.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133255424
eggie (2023-03-03 14:49:52+00:00): Een lege lijn doet niet. De tag is leisure=pitch met sport=soccer

Een jeux de boules baan is geen speeltuin... maar een leisure=pitch sport= boules .. en als je dat grote vlak speeltuin weghaalt wordt het vast wat netter.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-03-03 14:56:35+00:00): Ik heb je speeltuin wat anders ingedeeld. Speeltuin op speeltuin geeft een foutmelding.
name =Jeu de boulebaan verwijderd.  Geen naamtags gebruiken. 
Bovenstaande tags even als voorbeeld toegevoegd.
Probeer steeds in de wiki te kijken hoe iets 'moet'. In het begin kost dat wat meer tijd., maar daar pluk je later de vruchten van.
Even ctrl f5 voor het effect.
Groet
eggie
jpennycook (2023-03-03 15:40:58+00:00): Hi!

bicycle=use_sidepath shouldn't be used in England as we don't have compulsory cycleways (bicycles are allowed on public highways except "special roads" - mostly motorways: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_road )  The Wiki article on use_sidepath says:-
"This tag should only be applied in countries that have compulsory cycleways."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepath

Jon
jpennycook (2023-03-03 15:45:53+00:00): Also, the pavements are not shared use paths, so the tag wouldn't make sense anyway.
Finally, if you look at Bing Streetside, the blue sign allows buses, lorries, and bicycles.
https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=51.335934%7E-0.761361&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=1

Jon
jpennycook (2023-03-03 15:46:33+00:00): Sorry - this link is better: https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=4e239aa5-beef-43c4-9c5d-932962f67756&cp=51.335935%7E-0.761371&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027&style=x&dir=221.2&pi=-1.2
wkdgs (2023-03-23 13:52:29+00:00): Kannst du den "disused" Präfix auch vor die anderen Tags schreiben, die sich nur auf den geschlossenen Laden beziehen?

Sonst könnte z.B. der Name noch auf der Karte angezeigt werden
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133255867
Scout Jens (2023-03-26 14:41:25+00:00): Den Namen gibt es ja noch. Nur der Laden ist nicht mehr.
eggie (2023-03-03 14:31:57+00:00): Dag Noah.. 
Je vraagt feedback .. 
Het kan zo wel, maar in dit geval  kun je beter de aparte speelplaatsen taggen met kleine vlakken of evt met nodes.
Nu wordt alles overschaduwd door dat enorme vlak speeltuin terwijl het gewoon een grasveld is. 
eggie
user_1566574 (2023-03-06 18:46:19+00:00): Bonjour,
Est-il possible de savoir sur quoi repose le constat qu'il n'y a plus de chemin à cet endroit ?
La source indiquée, BDOrtho IGN, ne laisse subsister aucun doute à ce sujet.

Merci par avance.
jpennycook (2023-03-03 15:56:43+00:00): Hello again.

Could you add proper changeset comments, rather than just "sunbury updates", please?  Ideally, you can also select "Sources" in the "Add field" box, then select one or more sources you used.
Changeset comments should say what you planned to achieve and/or what you changed (e.g. "aligned roads with OSMUK Cadastral Parcels" or "added crossings") and where you got the information from (e.g. "aerial imagery", "Mapillary", "I walked along this road today", etc.)  

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Jon
bxl-forever (2023-03-04 10:08:09+00:00): Hello,

Before splitting a way, as you did for this one (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150973353), it is always a good idea to download the entire set of elements around it, including its relations.

In this changeset, you split a part of the roundabout but the relations using it were apparently not in your active JOSM layer.  That creates a gap in all those relations—several bus routes and local cycle routes—because they are untouched and refer to the only object they know, which is only one part of the roundabout.

Don’t worry, it’s all fixed.  I thought you might be interested to know about this kind of issue.
noelbov (2023-03-04 16:26:49+00:00): Sorry to have given you work. Normally I rely on JOSM who gives a warning in such a situation. Unfortunately it was not the case this time.
Sorry again
Helium314 (2023-09-16 14:34:52+00:00): Hi,
kannst du beim Gehsteig abspalten bitte auch weitere tags übernehmen?

Insbesondere denk ich da an surface, z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4583640 hat noch den sidewalk:both:surface tag, aber surface sollte jetzt wohl eher auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150784866 sein
kosmozaut (2023-09-25 08:14:12+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, ich hab den Fehler jetzt korrigiert (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141718655). Werde ih Zukunft mehr darauf achten.
Timonade (2023-03-03 16:15:25+00:00): Hi @four_traveling,

I noticed a couple of things with your change, first I would ask that in the future you limit changes to one local area at a time to keep the total size of each change record manageable, also you added a restaurant (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10706946429) but it was already entered. This point (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10706971207) was also already entered. I have already corrected these items. Please pay attention to them in the future.

Finally we come to this point (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10706971214) here I ask myself the question is the cafe directly on the street or is there also a mistake here?

With kind regards 
Timonade
limes11 (2023-03-04 22:21:50+00:00): He created lots of duplicates and added tourism=attraction without main tag. I doubt he knew that he was updating osm.

Unless somebody wants to go through 170 objects and try to keep what's worth, I vote to revert this.
limes11 (2023-03-04 22:24:11+00:00): Ouups, I was referring to 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133307431

but I suppose it's the same here
Timonade (2023-03-04 23:58:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133307431
170 node no thanks I would also be for a revert

In this changeset I have at least removed the double points how we proceed here is a good question
user_1566574 (2023-03-06 18:42:32+00:00): Bonsoir,
Je ne comprends pas bien pourquoi avoir supprimé cet objet, pourtant essentiel, pouvez-vous clarifier ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052263328

Merci d'avance.
MxxCon (2023-03-06 10:02:26+00:00): Please note that crossing=marked is intended only for crosswalks with STOP sign.
If crosswalk is controlled by a traffic light it must be tagged as crossing=traffic_signals
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133258530
Frans S (2023-03-10 18:12:30+00:00): Hello.  I reviewed this task as well.
You mapped a few tall buildings incorrectl
Please read this:
About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Please adjust wrong positioned buildings as well
This video shows how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133258541
android5027 (2025-07-02 03:12:56+00:00): I’m a local mapper. Thank you for adding POIs in Searcy. Regarding the smaller building housing Knightfire Barbecue—you mapped the building correctly. It is a separate building which shares a wall with the electronics repair store to the north.

On the other head, Knightfire Barbecue has moved locations. I separated the restaurant tags into a node in the new location in changeset #168377963.
Carlos Brys (2023-03-03 19:40:57+00:00): Se borran los datos de identificación personal, porque no están admitidos en OSM
confusedbuffalo (2023-03-04 08:10:06+00:00): Hello, thanks for adding things here, but be careful not to add a building tag where something is not a building.
I've fixed the park and garden here
limes11 (2023-03-03 21:00:09+00:00): Hi

ich habe die Wikidaten in Leverkusen wieder ergänzt. Mit Sicherheit der gleiche Physiker/Chemiker. So ein h wurde zu seinen Lebenszeiten sicher nicht immer konsequent gesetzt.

VG Limes
Carlos Brys (2023-03-03 19:39:20+00:00): Se borran los datos de identificación personal, porque no están admitidos en OSM
Filip009 (2023-03-08 16:20:35+00:00): Dobrý deň, prečo ste dal koleji name=Kolej?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1142146814
Langlaeufer (2023-03-03 15:57:54+00:00): 2 Fahrspuren?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133259332