piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2026-06-19 05:41:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
DD1GJ (2026-06-18 21:12:32+00:00): Hallo Eismann,

willkommen bei OSM und danke für das Ergänzen des fehlenden Pfades. Um diesen klar von den offiziellen MTB Trails und zugelassenen Wegen abzugrenzen, weirden auf solchen Wegen keine MTB-Scales vergeben.
silversurfer83 (2026-06-20 15:52:37+00:00): Hi :)

if it is indeed "unofficial", (a Trampelpfad in German), you can add informal=yes to drive that point home.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184269508
Access Claims (komoot) (2026-06-22 14:42:18+00:00): Thank you! I've adjusted the tag.
rskedgell (2026-06-18 14:36:09+00:00): Thanks!
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-19 06:12:20+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Are the added names real real?
highway=crossing (13949744940) 
highway=crossing (13949744941)
...
RandomThighsEnjoyer (2026-06-19 01:32:27+00:00): Siehe Hinweis #5139564
Taya_S (2026-06-19 09:41:44+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap

I see you're interested in adding MTB tracks in this area. If you are interested in really mapping these trails in as much detail as possible, then you might want to read the wiki page on MTB tagging. It contains a lot of very useful additional information:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking

Best regards,  
Taya Snijder
gurglypipe (2026-06-18 15:19:18+00:00): Hiya, has the shelter on the northbound bus stop been demolished? Last time I was there, there was a shelter, and it’s mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369008803.
gurglypipe (2026-06-20 10:30:02+00:00): I assume this was an accident and have re-added the shelter in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184347513. Let me know if that’s not correct, ta
Mark_S (2026-06-20 17:54:19+00:00): Accidental change. Agree with your correction
arafqus (2026-06-18 13:25:35+00:00): beach and added beach resort)
rarad74 (2026-06-18 19:36:18+00:00): Hi. I asked you if there is  phisical separation between lanes. Why you changed in double carriage?
rarad74 (2026-06-18 19:36:42+00:00): Speed limits for roundabouts in Romania is 30 km/h , not 50.
BakoyeRiver (2026-06-22 19:29:18+00:00): Hi rarad74, thank you for informing me of the roundabout speed in Romania. The road was remodeled from [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1417589451] and [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1476590512] up to [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1530374536] in order to reflect recent construction along this section, where physical barriers were added based on Vantor Hub imagery from 2026-06-17.
yelisey90 (2026-06-18 21:27:07+00:00): It doesn't look like bridges there... Rather, I think, the stream runs in culverts
Brukwa! (2026-06-19 08:14:40+00:00): I checked these places again and changed to culverts. 
Thanks for feedback.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184272737
CaldeiraG (2026-07-01 11:26:29+00:00): Olá Sado DTF, consegue-me dar o link da loja / mais informação sobre a loja? Obrigado,
Sado DTF (2026-07-01 11:31:04+00:00): Bom dia , neste momento estamos em férias e a remodelar o nosso site , mas estamos sitiados e em Setúbal.
mga_geo (2026-06-24 07:34:52+00:00): Bonjour,
Je crois que vous avez déplacé l'arrêt de bus "Église" sur la route/way.
Les "platform" ne doivent pas appartenir à la route mais être sur le trottoir.
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
Merci d'avance
Marc
aTarom (2026-06-18 16:48:52+00:00): Hola, es nuevo el esquema
content=liquid
content:liquid=N2
en vez de 
"content"="liquid_nitrogen"?
He estado un poco offline y no sé si se ha comentado por algún lado.
Gracias por editar, saludos.
BigRedPie (2026-06-18 17:52:13+00:00): Culpa mía, es como tú indicas. Lo corrijo. Gracias por avisar.
aTarom (2026-06-18 18:30:13+00:00): Genial!!! gracias por la rapidez y la ayuda en reducir ruido de la base de datos :D un placer así.
Que tengas un feliz mapeo!
jimkats (2026-07-01 18:45:26+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM.

I see you mapped a trail, parts of which though are overlapping with already mapped roads, which causes errors. I removed the parts where the trail follows the road, and added them in a relation of that hiking route.

Thank you for visiting Spetses, and hope you had a good time :). If you have any question regarding mapping in OpenStreetMap, don't hesitate to ask. Don't forget to also check OSM's forum and wiki.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 04:49:20+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339105

https://osm.org/changeset/184339105
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 04:49:51+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339115

https://osm.org/changeset/184339115
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 04:50:16+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339118

https://osm.org/changeset/184339118
m_fuhrmann (2026-06-19 09:03:43+00:00): Kuhl! Vielen Dank! Jetzt müssen wir nur noch den Spielplatz besser mappen :see_no_evil:
https://spieli.eu/#hessen/W123444729

Das übernehme ich gerne.
clamemmel (2026-06-19 09:10:26+00:00): Herzlichen Dank. Gerne kannst Du die Wege durch und um den Spielplatz nochmal abgehen, ob sie tatsächlich passen. Ich hatte mir eine separate Aufzeichnung gemacht, und 2 Wochen später hier gemappt. Insbes. nach Anschauen des Overlays mit den Satelliten-Bildern war ich mir nicht mehr 100%ig sicher, ob ich den Verlauf ganz exakt gemappt habe. Auch gibt es noch einen Weg, der noch nicht gemappt ist: 5m links vom Mülleimer im Nordwesten des Spielplatzes, da geht noch ein Weg nach Süden. Aus Zeitgründen konnte ich den damals nicht ablaufen.
Buraddo (2026-07-09 15:50:57+00:00): Reverted in #185417204
marcmarti (2026-06-18 15:11:47+00:00): Hello Saint_Erk,

Remember to tag businesses or services separately from address points.
Saint_Erk (2026-06-24 05:38:15+00:00): Thanks for replying quickly and fixing this! I didn't notice this convention in the section of the map I had loaded, but as I visited more places in Spain I see it's consistently done this way.
literan (2026-06-18 14:52:38+00:00): извиняюсь, нечаянно точку в Москве подвинул
kartler175 (2026-06-21 11:12:28+00:00): https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=10.48373&lat=53.51844&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=ring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Bitte bei der Bearbeitung von Relationen weitere betroffene Relationen berücksichtigen!
Gitasaleh Virast (2026-06-25 13:32:54+00:00): در این بسته تغییر حاوی خرابکاری، که کدگذاری معابر شهری تهران طبق سند 6-8-314-2 مصوب ۲۴ ژانویه ۲۰۲۳، که این سند متعلق به شهرداری تهران است، خرابکاری‌ها در بسته تغییر //www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184583620 اصلاح شدند.
فایل سند کدگذاری شهرداری تهران:
https://shaghool.ir/Files/286177_6-8-314-2.pdf
Gitasaleh Virast (2026-06-25 13:56:17+00:00): کدگذاری معابر مثل نامگذاری معابر، حذف شدنی نیستند
Gitasaleh Virast (2026-07-02 17:11:23+00:00): در این بسته تغییر حاوی خرابکاری، که کدگذاری معابر شهری تهران طبق سند 6-8-314-2 مصوب ۲۴ ژانویه ۲۰۲۳، که این سند متعلق به شهرداری تهران است، خرابکاری‌ها در بسته تغییر //www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184583620 اصلاح شدند.
فایل سند کدگذاری شهرداری تهران:
https://shaghool.ir/Files/286177_6-8-314-2.pdf
به امید قطع دسترسی بلندمدت ده سال به بالا برای تو
Linus W Frische (2026-06-26 21:19:26+00:00): Hej Anders. Jeg har slettet denne polygon, som du tilføjede https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1530631406 fordi

1) Skolerne i Oure er allerede kortlagt som relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18535712
2) polygonen dækkede heller ikke hele skoleområdet 

landuse=education kan desværre ikke ses i osm-carto, som er standard temaet på osm.org, men det kan vi ikke gøre så meget ved.

landuse=education kan dog godt ses ved at bruge Tracestack Topo-laget :)
Anders L (2026-06-27 07:33:41+00:00): Hej Linus,
Relationen opstod svjv da jeg oprettede området, fordi der allerede var et lille område (øverst) der var tagget. Man kan sige at det var den der ikke dækkede hele skoleområdet.

landuse=educataion er/kan være synligt på vektorkort, og det giver den effekt at man på middel-zoom, inden bygningerne vises, kan se hvad der er fx i byer - industri, commerse, uddannelse, beboelse. Fx her: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/52.20256/0.14276&layers=V (selvom OMT stilen har lav kontrast mellem landbrugsjord og uddannelse).

Så jeg synes det er en skam!
Anders L (2026-06-27 07:37:26+00:00): Eller alternativt, hvis relationen faktisk findes og defindere området, kan den så tagges med landuse?
Anders L (2026-06-27 07:45:43+00:00): Hej igen,

Landuse=educatoin er faktisk synligt i osm carto, som en lysegul baggrund, tydeligtst inden bygningerne bliver for dominerende.

Hvad det så er værd.
Linus W Frische (2026-06-27 08:35:20+00:00): Hej igen

Relationen https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161235561 har eksisteret i over et år; jeg oprettede den selv dengang jeg gik på højskolen. Relationen består af to elementer, der tilsammen dækker hele skoleområdet (inklusiv efterskolehusene nord for østervangen). Den er også allerede tagget med landuse=education  :)

Landuse=education vises ikke på osm-carto, men amenity=school gør. Grunden til du kan se et gult område på lave zoomniveauer i carto er fordi de zoomniveau er gemt i din browsercache. Det du kan se er den amenity=school , som nu er slettet. Hvis du rydder cachen for openstreetmap.org og genindlæser siden vil du nok ikke kunne se det gule område.

Hvis du ønsker en app der viser landuse=education kan jeg anbefale Comaps :)
Anders L (2026-06-27 08:57:18+00:00): Jeg kan ikke lide comaps på computeren, man har den på mobilen. Men som sagt viser vektor-kort typisk landuse=school.

Vektorkort er det der bruges langt de fleste steder uden for osm.org nu. Maptiler, openfreemap og versatiles tilbyder vektortiles til alle behov, og man kan selv bestemme hvad der vises, så længe det findes i skemaet for de tiles man bruger.

Det er også anbefalet, hvor flere skoler deler det samme område, at tagge på den måde jeg gjorde, selvom jeg overså relationen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool#Multiple_schools_on_one_site

Så jeg vil stadig foreslå at man tilføjer tagget til relationen, som i øvrigt ikke har noget overordnet tag. Det er almindeligt, at tagge relationer med landcover eller landuse, kan jeg se.
Linus W Frische (2026-06-27 10:21:06+00:00): Hej Anders

Jeg tror vi taler forbi hinanden.

Den relation, der repræsenterer skolerne i Oure HAR allerede tagget landuse=education. Den har haft det tag siden jeg tilføjede det i januar 2025.

Jeg ved ikke hvilken relation du kigger på, men den jeg snakker om er denne: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18535712 

Du tilføjede en polygon med amenity=school ikke landuse=education . Det er vi jo begge enige om er forkert. Skolerne i Oure er kortlagt som landuse=education på en relation. Hver enkelt højskole/efterskole/gymniasium er tilføjet som punkter inden i landuse=education relationen, hvilket passer med den wikiside du linker til.

Så jeg kan ikke helt se hvad du mener er kortlagt forkert 😅
Anders L (2026-06-27 10:25:45+00:00): Ok, jeg er en idiot, så. Sorry.
ceirios (2026-06-18 22:41:58+00:00): Hi there,

Do all of these places have some kind of marker on the ground saying that filming took place there? 

Things like "Littlefinger's Brothel" https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13950304454 seem to be in-universe locations, and OSM is for real-life places and features.

You may be interested in something like uMap for these:
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/

Cofion gorau,
Ceirios
Atlas of Westeros (2026-06-19 19:47:51+00:00): Hi Ceirios,

Thanks for your email. In most cases yes, the tourist board has placed a wall plaque, free standing plaque, etc marking specific important filming locations of Game of Thrones. One way to keep to pin titles of real locations might be 'Game of Thrones Filming Location - Piazza Mesquita Green Door'. That way I'm referring to a precise real world object. It's GOT universe details could be moved entirely to the description. What do you think? There are all real places that are important parts of the tourist offering of Malta, Croatia, Northern Ireland, Spain, Iceland, etc. But I do fully see what you mean about the titles being realistically described (no Westeros reference other than 'Game of Thrones Filming Location'. What do you think?

Is mise le meas,
Robert Dowling
Wicklow, Ireland
Atlas of Westeros (2026-06-19 19:48:39+00:00): Hi again Ceirios,

On second thoughts, I will indeed move to uMap.

Best,
Rob
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-19 12:42:56+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, likely sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184314347

https://osm.org/changeset/184314347
bxl-forever (2026-06-18 16:24:29+00:00): Hello,

I understand what you are trying to do here but I am afraid this is incorrect.

1) You created amenity=school nodes inside an amenity=school area. This is not permitted, such objects should never be nested. The most advisable course should be to retag the area as landuse=education, but you may want to rethink some of the other tags, then.

2) In Belgium, names having " - " (space + hyphen + space) are considered multilingual names; this is particularly important in Brussels. Use the ndash separator if you want to simulate a hyphen in the name.

3) Some of the tags are not used correctly, e.g., school:language (value must be "fr" and not the full name)
tansu_bla (2026-06-19 13:03:44+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for the feedback!

1) I used landuse=education and left the name(s) and description for clarity.

2) Good to know, I hadn't realized this applied to names of POIs as well. Fixed.

3) Fixed. When I typed "fr", "French" was a suggested answer. I'll be careful, but it would be better if a seemingly valid synonym didn't automatically appear.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-06-18 22:48:23+00:00): Hey emnem, just FYI the format of phone=* is invalid here (it should be +1-NNN-NNN-NNNN for NANP, although +1 NNN-NNN-NNNN and +1 NNN NNN NNNN will also work on a fallback basis. The confusedbuffalo bot *should* come around and fix it within 24-48 hours, but just letting you know for the future. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184278155
aTarom (2026-06-18 16:23:46+00:00): Hola, hay varios source con valor no permitido por licencia de uso "StreetView", se trata de quizás del que sí tenemos permiso de uso "Streetside"?
por ejemplo:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13950376342/history
Saludos
Magneto555 (2026-06-19 23:37:14+00:00): Gracias por avisarme @aTarom, ya he sacado un par de changesets para corregir el error, he borrado todas las referencias a StreetView. Un saludo.
Pachara Clinic (2026-06-24 10:49:06+00:00): มีคลินิกของฉัน ชื่อว่า พชรคลินิก สาขาหางดง Pachara Clinic Hang Dong
ตรงนี้ช่วยปักหมุดจริงให้ด้วย
Taunusklub | Stubenkaterin (2026-07-01 06:47:54+00:00): Hallo Herwescheluc, Warum hast Du den Weg umgelegt? Wie sehen die Wegezeichen vor Ort aus? Sind diese auch umgelegt oder verweisen sie noch auf die alte Führung? Danke für Deine Antwort Stubenkaterin
Herwescheluc (2026-07-10 11:24:22+00:00): Hallo, Stubenkaterin,

Ausführliche Antwort ist per DM unterwegs!

Grüße aus Herborn

Andreas
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-19 06:24:08+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185990948
granitschädel (2026-07-18 15:03:26+00:00): It is not the first time that I write you this, but please be careful when editing with aerial imagery, since they are often outdated. 
Because here, you destroyed my edits about the new track plan of the station after the reconstruction works.
Next time when you edit railway facilities, please research if there was any reconstruction works in the last time.
HaPe-CZ (2026-07-20 06:55:51+00:00): I'm still waiting for your reply regarding the railway station overpass at another hub. You haven't replied yet.
koastoas (2026-06-19 08:41:49+00:00): Danke fürs eintragen des Kreisverkehrs in Bad Salzuflen.
Welche Quellen oder welches Luftbild hast du denn dafür verwendet?
NRW Ortophoto hat den noch nicht drin.
Tom Landlord (2026-06-20 00:04:39+00:00): Das wird in NRW Orthophoto noch aktualisiert werden, wenn neue Aufnahmen gemacht worden sind. So aktuell ist das nicht. Quelle ist die Lage vor Ort.
Kamil Kalata (2026-06-18 16:31:11+00:00): Witaj!
Twoje zmiany, z których najważniejsze  dotyczą infrastruktury kolejowej w Krzęcinie, to oczywista fikcja, w związku z czym je wycofałem (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184279510). Jeżeli masz chęć malowania po mapie, jest od tego projekt OpenGeofiction (https://opengeofiction.net).
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-01 00:39:09+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20891
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 01:27:04+00:00): DWG revert - invalid changes, abusive language

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185567442
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 10:08:31+00:00): Thanks Flappy, got to it quicker than I could! Also nonsensical tagging, blatant advertising, and to top it all off a changeset source=* of Google Maps to boot.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184279505
GrabTH_Tanyaporn (2026-06-26 08:23:08+00:00): Hi Uwenr5, Thank you for your contribution in Thailand. Please do not revert the edits just using the satellite imagery, there are many highways constructions are completed and open for public usage. You can verify from the local news. Satellite Imagery is out dated for many cases. Feel free to reach out to me or Grab Team in Thailand before reverting.

Happy Mapping!

Thanks,
Tanyaporn
HashFerret (2026-06-18 16:43:59+00:00): Hi Robins, looks like this was probably a test of the deflock app. Could you confirm and delete the camera? Changes are pushed pretty quickly to the live map, so it's a totally understandable mistake. Also just an FYI if you do spot any unmapped cameras in SLC, the city uses Motorola, though you still might see Flock near hardware stores or UTA stations. Thanks for helping map ALPRs!
Kamil Kalata (2026-06-18 17:03:58+00:00): Witaj.
Wieś Polanka Hallera dalej istnieje; Twoją zmianę wycofałem (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184281075).
Przeczytaj proszę mój komentarz pod jednym z Twoich poprzednich zestawów (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184278648#c1613874).
XimeX (2026-06-18 19:42:51+00:00): Du kannst die Kupplungsgrößen als eigenen Tag setzen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:couplings:diameters
Und auch gleich den Kupplungstyp: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:couplings:type
Ist bei uns in Österreich "Storz"
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 04:50:38+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339127

https://osm.org/changeset/184339127
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 04:50:59+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339134

https://osm.org/changeset/184339134
mapwizz1492 (2026-07-05 20:10:46+00:00): Looks fine
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 04:51:20+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339139

https://osm.org/changeset/184339139
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 04:51:47+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339147

https://osm.org/changeset/184339147
蕉饼电脑 (2026-06-18 19:38:49+00:00): 请直接将范围添加至 relation/6590167 关系内
Szymson (2026-06-18 17:16:45+00:00): Jaki jest sens urywania tertiary na granicy lasu?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128106960
To już nie lepiej dociągnąć to do pętli autobusowej w Krępie Słupskiej?
Jaksza (2026-06-18 17:30:12+00:00): Racja. Zasugerowałem się końcem podziału pasów i spowalniaczami za znakiem miejscowości, ale dociągnięcie do pętli autobusowej ma zdecydowanie większy sens. Zaraz to poprawię, dzięki.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 04:52:10+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339158

https://osm.org/changeset/184339158
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 04:52:33+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339167

https://osm.org/changeset/184339167
NieWnen (2026-06-21 22:44:03+00:00): Cześć,
w tej jak i w innych Twoich zmianach linia taka jak ta ma nieprawidłowe tagowanie:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1530659020

Jeśli jest to CPR lub inna forma ścieżki rowerowej, to zachęcam do poprawy zgodnie z wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w

Jeśli to zwykły chodnik, to należy usunąć z niego tagi bicycle=* i foot=*

Jako, że jest to edycja wykonywana przez edytor iD to dodam tylko, że zawsze warto patrzeć w tagi.
NieWnen (2026-06-21 22:46:57+00:00): https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2s0Q

Tym zapytaniem możesz wyświetlić wszystkie fragmenty z niejasnym tagowaniem, które wymagają prawdopodobnie poprawy.
WiFox (2026-07-03 17:51:54+00:00): Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi, już poprawione. Zauważyłem, że istnieje mnóstwo obiektów z tego typu błędnym tagowaniem, niektóre nawet z przed kilkunastu lat.

Zauważyłem też, że w iD występują po dwa obiekty o takich samych nazwach np. "Przejazd pieszo-rowerowy" - jeden ma prawidłowe tagi, a drugi błędne.
NieWnen (2026-07-03 22:00:12+00:00): > Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi, już poprawione. Zauważyłem, że istnieje mnóstwo obiektów z tego typu błędnym tagowaniem, niektóre nawet z przed kilkunastu lat.

Tak, niestety jest tego trochę, ale sukcesywnie jest to sprzątane i liczba błędów spada, do czego tez staram się zachęcać każdego u kogo takie coś wykryje – każda pomoc się przyda :)

> Zauważyłem też, że w iD występują po dwa obiekty o takich samych nazwach np. "Przejazd pieszo-rowerowy" - jeden ma prawidłowe tagi, a drugi błędne.

O, o tym nie wiedziałem. Ogólnie edytor iD względnie niedawno doczekał się szablonów na CPRy (przez to że w różnych krajach taguje się to na różny sposób), co samo w sobie jest sukcesem, że udało się w ogóle to wprowadzić, ale no na pewno warto to zgłosić, żeby nie było duplikatu z błędem.

Niemniej zawsze warto patrzeć w tagi :P
NieWnen (2026-07-03 22:20:57+00:00): Co do drugiego, to widzę, że ostatnio coś było zmieniane w presetach do iD to może akurat zostanie poprawione, bo ten szablon jest wykluczony dla Polski, ale z jakiegoś powodu jednak się wyświetla.

https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2381
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 04:52:57+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339172

https://osm.org/changeset/184339172
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 04:53:22+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339179

https://osm.org/changeset/184339179