piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Paulau59 (2026-05-20 16:12:49+00:00): Bonjour, 
Une fois de plus je dois vous remercier pour vos commentaires qui me sont très utiles et me permettent d’apprendre de mes erreurs.
Je vais corriger ca tres rapidement.
En revanche la date d'ouverture prévue de la Rue Haute Loge a Le Maisnil est bien prévue courant Juin 2026 et les travaux ont commence le 3 Novembre 2025.
Je ne comprends donc pas ce que vous vouliez dire par la start date dans le passé? 
Bonne journée
Sébastien Pi (2026-05-20 22:38:48+00:00): Bonsoir,

Je vois que vous avez corrigé la date ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1498894621/history/7.
En fait start_date n’est pas la date de début de construction mais bien celle de l’ouverture au public : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:start_date
openning_date est bien ici, car c’est prévisionnel.

Attention, vous avez mis tertiary. C’est mieux qu’une autoroute, mais ça ne reste qu’un trottoir :).
Si vous n’êtes pas très familier avec les types de route, n’hésitez pas à consulter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:highway (la page est un peu longue, mais sa lecture vaut la peine quand on débute pour faire les bons choix).

Merci
Sébastien Pi (2026-05-20 22:40:12+00:00): Du coup, comme vous aviez mis une start_date en 11/2025, c’est avant l’ouverture. C’est pour cela que je parlais de date dans le passé pour préciser ma réponse.

Merci pour le retour
Sébastien Pi (2026-05-20 22:43:23+00:00): Pour info, je ne sais pas si vous avez vu les notes. Elles sont visible de base dans l’éditeur et possiblement sur la carte (si l’option est activée).
Je suis cette voie verte depuis quelques mois et j’ai créé une note dessus pour le suivi : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5141287
N’hésitez pas à les consulter et/ou participer si cela concerne les zones que vous mettez à jour/connaissez.

J’arrête mes messages multiples, je pense avoir fait le tour :)
Paulau59 (2026-05-21 17:28:46+00:00): Bonjour, 
Merci beaucoup pour vos retours et explications!
Je tacherais de m’améliorer sur les types de routes, merci beaucoup pour votre aide. 
Je suis désolé j’ai confondu la start date avec la date des débuts des travaux. 
Je vous remercie pour votre bienveillance et vos explications. 
Bonne journée
eggie (2026-05-02 10:40:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback.. Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
FajrAl (2026-05-02 11:43:10+00:00): Hi there! Just a heads-up: the admin boundaries imported by Aitortxu_ (which you're currently editing) have some issues. You can find the discussion and details here: changeset/182094882.
mueschel (2026-05-02 12:09:29+00:00): I didn't check them in great detail - let me know if I can help somehow.
FajrAl (2026-05-02 11:44:52+00:00): Jika ingin menambahkan batas administrasi di daerah ini, lebih baik kontak saya atau komunitas OSM Indonesia di Telegram.
eggie (2026-05-02 10:43:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Je mag op veel meer plaatsen komen als je denkt. Ook op priveterrein.
Staat dit aangeven als verboden toegang.. art 461 wvs Staat er een gesloten hek aan het begin?

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-05-02 10:51:08+00:00): Evt zou je access=permissive lunnen taggen. Er staat hier volgens mij nergens een bord Verboden Toegang. Het loopt ook niet over een erf.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-05-02 11:05:53+00:00): Hier de juridische uitleg..
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Toegangsrecht_in_Nederland
Arjanos (2026-05-03 19:15:46+00:00): Heel erg bedankt eggie! Ook heel interessant om de wikipediapagina over toegangsrecht te lezen.

Ik heb de access aangepast naar permissive. Er staan geen hekken of borden bij het pad.

Voor de context: het betreft een pad wat de agrariër gebruikt om bij zijn percelen te komen. Op de percelen vindt weidevogelbescherming plaats. De bescherming wordt nu verstoord, doordat en een gravelroute van Strava doorheen loopt
eggie (2026-05-03 19:25:52+00:00): Yep.. ken het wel daar. Denk dat je gravelbikers niet tegenhoudt met accesstags in osm.
Strava werkt net andersom. Er wordt gefietst.. dus een route.
Denk dat er dan in het broedseizoen bordjes moeten komen met uitleg.
Hoop maar dat de vogeltje wennen aan de bikers.
Groet,
eggie
Arjanos (2026-05-03 19:36:46+00:00): Aah, leuk dat je het kent daar!
We gaan in elk geval bordjes plaatsen van de weidevogelbescherming. Ik zie nu dat daarop wordt verwezen naar artikel 461. Dus toegang verboden, maar de tag permissive lijkt mij dan nog steeds juist.
Bedankt voor je feedback!
Josef73 (2026-05-02 12:17:27+00:00): Mulțumesc. / Thank you.
Metzor (2026-06-18 22:01:25+00:00): Hallo RThomps,

Du schreibst "Eine Straße ist nicht passierbar, da sie durch ein Privatgrundstück geht (Metzingen)".

Das heißt, für den Grundstücksbesitzer ist der Weg passierbar?

Dann wäre es access=private

Privatgrundstück wäre dafür aber nicht hinreichend, es braucht schon ein Schild (unbefugte Verboten o.ä.) oder eine Umfriedung (Hecke/Zaun), aus der ersichtlich ist, dass es privat ist. Wenn ich mich recht erinnere, macht das dort eine Hecke und ein Tor deutlich?

Viele Grüße
Metzor
Frans S (2026-05-02 13:07:13+00:00): Hello.  I reviewed your mappings here. 
Since the path you mapped is at best 1.5 mtr wide, it is to be tagged as a path rather than a residential highway.
I corrected it. 
btw. In this rural areas you can tag roads mostly as unclassified, or paths. 
Check the highway wiki africa

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa

Best regards
 Residential roads are to be find in big villages and towns.
OsmiumCZ (2026-05-03 07:23:09+00:00): Hi Frank,
I have compared the way history. I did not edit tags values, I have based the trip location on the newest Bing satellite image.
4b696d (2026-05-06 17:27:26+00:00): Und wieso hast du die wichtigsten Tags nicht mit rübergenommen?
CodentGIS (2026-05-31 19:33:25+00:00): Hey there!

Please be informed that we are not allowed to use NAMRIA boundary data, since we need explicit permission when using any government data. Additionally, NAMRIA's boundary data is estimated and can be inaccurate.

If you wish to know more info, either check this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/FAQs_for_PH_data
or feel free to message me. Otherwise, reverting the change is the most recommended option to do, unless you have explicit permission from NAMRIA. Thanks!

Sincerely,
cccr210
Blythe0625 (2026-06-01 04:09:20+00:00): can you revert the borders back it was before? i might plan to make different borders other than NAMRIA. thank you.
CodentGIS (2026-06-02 02:47:57+00:00): I'll try my best. Although, could you give me all of the changeset IDs from you that involve NAMRIA data? It'll make things easier, and would have likely got things that I could miss if I don't have a catalog. Thanks!
Blythe0625 (2026-06-02 04:07:19+00:00): hello, almost all of my changes are NAMRIA borders, just double check the changeset IDs if its NAMRIA borders, however don't revert the coastlines, rivers, roads, etc. 
Only revert the boundaries.
Also should the boundaries be based on this instead: https://gadm.org/maps/PHL_1.html
If not, I will make the borders by myself
Thank you.
CodentGIS (2026-06-03 02:59:29+00:00): I'm pretty sure GADM boundaries are just as inaccurate as the previous OSM boundaries. They miss a ton of things, to the point of huge swaths of land and even barangays.

I do recommend you make it yourself. I've done my own on a lot of Cagayan boundaries, and I've kept a list of barangays to keep track. You could use this for your reference: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sprKGA3y0ca3xeItkEjkyuHcalk4p2R4p2dNu642oYs/edit?usp=sharing

Otherwise, I won't need to revert the boundaries if you're changing it anyways. It's cleaner and, honestly, might unnecessarily destroy work you've done, which doesn't come with the boundary.

Additionally, you should prioritize creating those boundaries quickly so it doesn't bring any extra unnecessary attention, since you've technically violated OSM rules (we still give new users a chance, don't worry about it!), although without the cost of accuracy.

Thank you for your cooperation!
Blythe0625 (2026-06-03 10:20:22+00:00): Thank you. I will help fixing the borders instead based on the reference.
ClaveScottPH (2026-05-02 13:35:13+00:00): Thanks.
Totor (2026-05-07 05:02:28+00:00): Walay Sapayan!
If you have local knowledge about the TV5 transmitter antennas or buildings, feel free to improve. The Sattelite picures I used are not very clear unfortunately...
george1201 (2026-05-04 20:58:28+00:00): Zu n13759082805 habe ich einen Kommentar. "Größter Reifen der Welt" ist kein Name, das ist eine Beschreibung dieses Objekts. Siehe Wiki-Artikel zu name=*.
george1201 (2026-05-04 21:05:51+00:00): Anderes Thema: Da du offenbar für diesen CS vor Ort warst, möchte ich dich fragen: Kannst du vielleicht etwas zur Diskussion zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181774822 beitragen?
mavl (2026-06-07 06:02:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183764451, 183764460, 183764431, 183764453, 183764448, 183764459, 183764455 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20768].
eggie (2026-05-02 12:20:21+00:00): Dag Karel,

Dit is helaas niet correct. We hebben importadresnodes vanuit de BAG.
Het adres heb ik verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-05-02 12:22:14+00:00): Dag Karel In zo'n situatie gebruiken we access=private..
MVG
eggie
FajrAl (2026-05-04 09:51:35+00:00): reverted in changeset/182195442
FajrAl (2026-05-04 10:45:33+00:00): reverted in changeset/182197321
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-04 06:39:33+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import using unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182189165
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-04 06:38:35+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import using unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182189148
FajrAl (2026-05-02 12:36:57+00:00): please see changeset/182094882
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182113636
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-04 06:37:44+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import using unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182189125
richlv (2026-05-16 16:49:15+00:00): Sveiki, liels paldies par kartes papildināšanu. Te mazliet palabojām nosaukumus, pievienojām viesu nama punktu utt.

Ja rodas kādi jautājumi, tos priecāsimies atbildēt Latvijas OSM kopienas čatā - https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
SabineSW (2026-05-26 15:33:39+00:00): Inzwischen habe ich eine Anzeige im blick gesehen, dass am 22./23.Mai 2026 in Halfing (Bahnhofstr. 20) Neueröffnung ist. Auf der Webseite nach wie vor kein Hinweis.
BCNorwich (2026-05-02 14:35:53+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

We are not allowed to copy Google Maps data into OSM. Google Maps is copyright-protected.

I would strongly suggest you revert your changes. I can do this for you if you wish.

Regards Bernard.
Konkon153 (2026-05-02 12:54:56+00:00): [ und damit alle 237 aktuell vorhandenen Adressen in der Gemeinde Redefin vollständig angepasst ]
DeFra85 (2026-06-21 12:11:40+00:00): Ahoi, du hast mit dem Löschen der Wege vier Wanderwege (DiVa-Walk, Bad Essener Rundweg, TERRA.track Hünnefelder Tannen, Rundweg 5) zerschnitten, sodass da jetzt eine große Lücke klafft. Wie verlaufen die Wanderwege denn jetzt vor Ort? Sowas sollte natürlich mit bedacht werden.

Und das Löschen von Wegen ist in OSM nicht gern gesehen. Wenn Wege sich grundlegend verändern sollte man das erstmal mit einem Lebenszyklus-Präfix machen, siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix

Bei diesem Beispiel wäre aus dem highway=path z.B. ein abandoned:highway=path oder razed:highway=path bei der Brücke.

Beste Grüße DeFra85
Sébastien Pi (2026-05-20 14:28:04+00:00): Bonjour,

Concernant https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1470044147, vous avez indiqué horse=yes. Or pour moi ici ce n’est pas le cas : https://equipedia.ifce.fr/economie-et-filiere/reglementation/detention-et-utilisation-du-cheval/equides-et-droit-de-circulation
> (le cheval ne doit pas circuler sur les trottoirs, par exemple).

Ici, c’est un trottoir qui sert de C115. D’ailleurs d’après les « normes » locales, il aurait fallu que je crée à l’époque un footway : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/R%C3%A9seau_cyclable_de_la_MEL

Il n’est pas utile de rajouter motor_vehicule=no même si c’est possible (valeur par défaut).

Quel est votre avis ?

Merci
Paulau59 (2026-05-20 16:01:25+00:00): Bonjour M, 
Je vous prie de m'excuser et je vus remercrie de votre commentaire par rapport au https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1470044147 . Le fait d'avoir mis Horse=Yes est une erreur que je vais corriger.
Je vous remercie, 
Bonne journée
opendcc (2026-07-24 15:16:27+00:00): Die Tafel ist vor Ort nicht vorhanden. Kannst Du bitte angeben, was die Quelle Deiner Eintragung ist?
opendcc (2026-07-24 15:11:12+00:00): Ich kann diese Tafel vor Ort nicht entdecken. Hast da vielleicht noch Erinnerungen, wo der genau ist?
mackerski (2026-05-15 11:45:12+00:00): Hi - you've changed the name of a Jewellery shop on Talbot Street to "Gadget Land", but left it tagged as a jewellery shop, which I'm guessing isn't intended...
Own Oh (2026-05-17 14:42:21+00:00): Yes thanks. Got distracted and will amend.
Shawn1502 (2026-06-13 08:46:11+00:00): Hi Farras

Could you share what is your source for this edit?

Thank you!
Farras (2026-06-15 17:52:45+00:00): Hi! It's from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery, 24 April 2026. Related info: https://www.mindef.gov.sg/news-and-events/latest-releases/4may26-mq/
eggie (2026-05-02 15:01:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
GOwin (2026-05-04 11:22:34+00:00): Hi there, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! 🎉

We noticed you're working with some boundary data, and we wanted to reach out as a friendly heads-up. It looks like these boundaries might be coming from the Philippine Statistical Authority, and we want to make sure we're respecting their ownership and licensing,  getting the right permissions before bringing them into OSM. This is really important to us!

The good news is that we've got resources to help! If you'd like to learn more about how imports and licensing work in OpenStreetMap, we're happy to walk you through it. It's easier than you might think.

Here are a couple of great places to start:

    FAQ on PH data imports: https://openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/FAQs\_for\_PH\_data
    Community support channels: https://osm.org/wiki/PH

Our local communities in the Philippines are super helpful and genuinely want to support users' initiatives —whether that's answering questions, discussing the best way to handle this data, or finding alternative sources that are already open for use.

Just so you know, imports that haven't been discussed with the community or come from unclear sources do tend to get removed down the line. We do this to keep OSM data free and available for everyone to use without restrictions. But don't worry—we can absolutely figure this out together!

Feel free to reach out with any questions. We're here to help. 😊
GOwin (2026-05-04 11:28:29+00:00): Hi there, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! 🎉

We noticed you're working with some boundary data, and we wanted to reach out as a friendly heads-up. It looks like these boundaries might be coming from the Philippine Statistical Authority, and we want to make sure we're respecting their ownership and getting the right permissions before bringing them into OSM. This is really important to us!

The good news is that we've got resources to help! If you'd like to learn more about how imports and licensing work in OpenStreetMap, we're happy to walk you through it. It's easier than you might think.

Here are a couple of great places to start:

    FAQ on PH data imports: https://openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/FAQs_for_PH_data
    Community support channels: https://osm.org/wiki/PH

Our local communities in the Philippines are super helpful and genuinely want to support you—whether that's answering questions, discussing the best way to handle this data, or finding alternative sources that are already open for use.

Just so you know, imports that haven't been discussed with the community or come from unclear sources do tend to get removed down the line. We do this to keep OSM data free and available for everyone to use without restrictions. But don't worry—we can absolutely figure this out together!

Feel free to reach out with any questions. We're here to help. 😊
GOwin (2026-05-04 11:22:56+00:00): Hi there, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! 🎉

We noticed you're working with some boundary data, and we wanted to reach out as a friendly heads-up. It looks like these boundaries might be coming from the Philippine Statistical Authority, and we want to make sure we're respecting their ownership and licensing,  getting the right permissions before bringing them into OSM. This is really important to us!

The good news is that we've got resources to help! If you'd like to learn more about how imports and licensing work in OpenStreetMap, we're happy to walk you through it. It's easier than you might think.

Here are a couple of great places to start:

    FAQ on PH data imports: https://openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/FAQs\_for\_PH\_data
    Community support channels: https://osm.org/wiki/PH

Our local communities in the Philippines are super helpful and genuinely want to support users' initiatives —whether that's answering questions, discussing the best way to handle this data, or finding alternative sources that are already open for use.

Just so you know, imports that haven't been discussed with the community or come from unclear sources do tend to get removed down the line. We do this to keep OSM data free and available for everyone to use without restrictions. But don't worry—we can absolutely figure this out together!

Feel free to reach out with any questions. We're here to help. 😊
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-02 16:26:42+00:00): Hi James Blessings, welcome to OSM.

You created several duplicate buildings here.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1507772214
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1507772215

Best regards.
ColbyTheWorldTraveler (2026-05-04 21:53:48+00:00): I was about to brush this off as vandalism, but upon checking, the phone number really 1234567890. That's wild!

Welcome to the map!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182118867
biker@gf (2026-05-04 13:24:19+00:00): Welche Routen wurden bereits gelöscht?
Nakaner (2026-05-04 14:44:04+00:00): Hallo biker@gf,

außer den beiden Routen in diesem Änderungssatz  habe ich in den letzten Monaten keine Radrouten in Niedersachsen gelöscht.

Solltest du mir der Löschung nicht einverstanden sein, darfst du gerne im deutschen Forum einen neuen Thread anlegen und andere Mapper zu ihrer Meinung in dieser Angelegenheit befragen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
GOwin (2026-05-04 11:22:08+00:00): Hi there, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! 🎉

We noticed you're working with some boundary data, and we wanted to reach out as a friendly heads-up. It looks like these boundaries might be coming from the Philippine Statistical Authority, and we want to make sure we're respecting their ownership and licensing,  getting the right permissions before bringing them into OSM. This is really important to us!

The good news is that we've got resources to help! If you'd like to learn more about how imports and licensing work in OpenStreetMap, we're happy to walk you through it. It's easier than you might think.

Here are a couple of great places to start:

    FAQ on PH data imports: https://openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/FAQs\_for\_PH\_data
    Community support channels: https://osm.org/wiki/PH

Our local communities in the Philippines are super helpful and genuinely want to support users' initiatives —whether that's answering questions, discussing the best way to handle this data, or finding alternative sources that are already open for use.

Just so you know, imports that haven't been discussed with the community or come from unclear sources do tend to get removed down the line. We do this to keep OSM data free and available for everyone to use without restrictions. But don't worry—we can absolutely figure this out together!

Feel free to reach out with any questions. We're here to help. 😊
FajrAl (2026-05-04 10:12:39+00:00): You need to be careful with the source tag. The BPS is for Indonesian data, not Philippines.
GOwin (2026-05-04 11:29:32+00:00): Hi there, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! 🎉

We noticed you're working with some boundary data, and we wanted to reach out as a friendly heads-up. It looks like these boundaries might be coming from the Philippine Statistical Authority, and we want to make sure we're respecting their ownership and getting the right permissions before bringing them into OSM. This is really important to us!

The good news is that we've got resources to help! If you'd like to learn more about how imports and licensing work in OpenStreetMap, we're happy to walk you through it. It's easier than you might think.

Here are a couple of great places to start:

    FAQ on PH data imports: https://openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/FAQs_for_PH_data
    Community support channels: https://osm.org/wiki/PH

Our local communities in the Philippines are super helpful and genuinely want to support you—whether that's answering questions, discussing the best way to handle this data, or finding alternative sources that are already open for use.

Just so you know, imports that haven't been discussed with the community or come from unclear sources do tend to get removed down the line. We do this to keep OSM data free and available for everyone to use without restrictions. But don't worry—we can absolutely figure this out together!

Feel free to reach out with any questions. We're here to help. 😊
GOwin (2026-05-04 11:21:51+00:00): Hi there, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! 🎉

We noticed you're working with some boundary data, and we wanted to reach out as a friendly heads-up. It looks like these boundaries might be coming from the Philippine Statistical Authority, and we want to make sure we're respecting their ownership and licensing,  getting the right permissions before bringing them into OSM. This is really important to us!

The good news is that we've got resources to help! If you'd like to learn more about how imports and licensing work in OpenStreetMap, we're happy to walk you through it. It's easier than you might think.

Here are a couple of great places to start:

    FAQ on PH data imports: https://openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/FAQs\_for\_PH\_data
    Community support channels: https://osm.org/wiki/PH

Our local communities in the Philippines are super helpful and genuinely want to support users' initiatives —whether that's answering questions, discussing the best way to handle this data, or finding alternative sources that are already open for use.

Just so you know, imports that haven't been discussed with the community or come from unclear sources do tend to get removed down the line. We do this to keep OSM data free and available for everyone to use without restrictions. But don't worry—we can absolutely figure this out together!

Feel free to reach out with any questions. We're here to help. 😊