piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-03-13 22:03:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13646192871 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Livery service building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-22 05:33:15+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180234254
(Delete spam tags. First version)
Luxury Ridess (2026-03-25 08:53:29+00:00): Thank you for taking the time to review my changeset. I appreciate your effort and feedback. I want to assure you that I have no intention of spamming I'm simply focused on learning and improving.

Thank you again.
JuanElDemografo (2026-03-13 22:42:32+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM. Is this land used for grazing animals or growing hay? In that case the most appropriate tags would be landuse=meadow with meadow=pasture or meadow=agricultural. I couldn't tell what you use it for from imagery so I didn't specify which kind of meadow it is.

We use landuse=farmland to refer to areas used for growing crops in particular, which doesn't seem to be the case here from aerial imagery.
Elf on the Shelf (2026-03-15 01:55:21+00:00): Okay your correct
bartgron (2026-03-14 14:24:44+00:00): OSM to nie miejsce do reklamowania swoich usług w opisie zestawu zmian
iandees (2026-03-13 22:14:23+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
IsStatenIsland (2026-03-13 23:51:47+00:00): Thank you for this. What a mess. I will be doing a bunch of edits right now.

You also forgot to open the M&E Track 5.
Fraxi (2026-03-14 08:37:10+00:00): Здравейте!
Наистина ли в местата на въпросните правоъгълници паркират коли? Само на едно място в СЗ край виждам паркирала кола(на ESRI снимки от 15.05.2025). Признавам, че не съм бил там. Но на снимките виждам на места дървета?! 
От друга страна може да тагнете цялата голяма площ с amenity=parking, а отделните места с amenity=parking_space. Повече на https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space (или в случая в коментара явно тага, който ви дадох ще се преобразува в линк, водещ към съответната страница в уикито).
Fraxi (2026-03-14 09:04:38+00:00): Разгледах и наземни снимки. Игнорирайте въпроса ми в предния коментар, но е добре да отбележите паркоместата.
OlasMapy (2026-03-26 16:48:12+00:00): tory tak są używane że zarosły, tak samo jak na toruńskiej
Till_btn (2026-03-15 21:28:22+00:00): Auch hier noch mal die Frage, was für Quellen nutzt du für die Eintragungen? 
Die Tags hier sind etwas seltsam: zu "path" gehört kein "tracktype", "description=Garten Nummer" ?, "access=private" mit "bicycle/foot=yes" ist unnötig und auch "vehicle=no" gilt implizit bei "path"
NGL-engel (2026-03-17 20:11:29+00:00): Hallo Till, vom nördlichsten Weg habe ich ein Bild gefunden, auf dem sowohl die Nummer des Weges als auch der Zusatz „Garten Nr. 1–11” angegeben waren. Da ich noch weiter recherchiert hatte, habe ich am Ende vergessen, bei allen anderen Wegen die „description=" wieder zu löschen.
Da es sich um eine Kleingartensiedlung handelt, bin ich davon ausgegangen, dass es sich zwar um Privatgelände (des Vereins) handelt, es aber trotzdem öffentlich zugänglich ist. Falls dem nicht so sein sollte, wäre es nett, wenn du es ändern würdest.
NGL-engel (2026-03-17 20:13:36+00:00): Stichwort Zugänglichkeit: Viele Wege im westlichen und südlichen Wald sind mit „traffic_sign=DE:260” gekennzeichnet. Das soll laut dem Verkehrszeichen Tool https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=  mit „motor_vehicle=no” gemappt werden. Ich habe die Waldwege dementsprechend angepasst.
tomhukins (2026-03-26 18:18:56+00:00): This changeset contains a huge number of modifications, making it hard to review.  In future, would you consider making smaller changes, with each change focusing on a particular theme, to make review easier?
markalex- (2026-03-14 06:24:10+00:00): You changed area around from construction, but didn't retag building - it was building=construction. I fixed that.
But I'm not sure about road on the south - is it still under construction?
iandees (2026-03-14 00:34:37+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
n1kn0k (2026-07-11 02:04:10+00:00): Salamat at inayos mo! Hindi ko napansin 'yon, at hindi ko rin sinasadyang galawin ito.

May kahirapang mapansin yung mga ganito sa Vespucci. Pasensya na, at susubukan kong bantayan sa mga susunod ko pang edits.
iandees (2026-03-14 00:34:42+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
smilytruffle (2026-03-14 17:17:10+00:00): I deleted this path, as Davis Park is currently closed for renovation and is just a field of dirt. I think it would be best to leave it off until the path reopens later this year.
oatscoop (2026-03-14 21:55:26+00:00): Ah, my mistake. I haven't been on it since last fall and though it being missing was an oversight. 

I was downtown today and checked what was accessible and it appears the bridge is open still. There's access (but seemingly no parking) on the west side from South Main.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:06:06+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 178107862, 178107980, 178108085, 178108453, 178108573, 178108632, 178109472, 178109571, 178110408, 178110744, 178111435, 178112141, 178112556, 178112716, 178112769, 178112856, 178113718, 178114358, 178114765, 178115435, 178115493, 178115547, 178115566, 178373933, 178373976, 178374171, 178374746, 178375002, 178375319, 178376032, 178376139, 178377806, 178378042, 178378165, 178378217, 178378348, 178480379, 178480463, 178480554, 178480638, 178684643, 178684680, 178684814, 178684859, 178685081, 178685143, 178685342, 178686012, 178686071, 178688365, 178688461, 178688732, 178688947, 178689140, 178689309, 178689579, 178690391, 178690522, 178690589, 178694794, 178694921, 178695020, 178695086, 178695126, 178695452, 178695487, 178695594, 178695750, 178696053, 178696155, 178696273, 178696323, 178696465, 178735185, 178735656, 178742679, 178782318, 178789017, 178830252, 178830354, 178830796, 178831301, 178831502, 178831768, 178831942, 178837002, 178960177, 178960267, 178960325, 178960371, 178960424, 179277664, 179277738, 179277806, 179277819, 179277846, 179277864, 179277903, 179278091, 179278714, 179278836, 179278930, 179278946, 179278993, 179279015, 179279076, 179279240, 179279261, 179279284, 179279344, 179279379, 179302160, 179302268, 179302301, 179302983, 179303299, 179303855, 179303906, 179304164, 179304684, 179305478, 179306798, 179307530, 179308553, 179308665, 179308954, 179309064, 179312341, 179313315, 179313536, 179313650, 179314379, 179315050, 179315172, 179316345, 179316751, 179317019, 179317100, 179317397, 179317946, 179317981, 179318070, 179318564, 179319304, 179319553, 179319709, 179319775, 179319936, 179320062, 179320113, 179320295, 179320468, 179321819, 179321942, 179322583, 179322787, 179322986, 179323037, 179323098, 179323258, 179323374, 179323500, 179323597, 179323768, 179324919, 179325167, 179325796, 179326307, 179326465, 179326581, 179326883, 179327007, 179327374, 179361406, 179361450, 179361505, 179361696, 179361858, 179361888, 179362031, 179387679, 179388443, 179389435, 179390175, 179390459, 179390529, 179403066, 179403336, 179403459, 179403628, 179404420, 179405131, 179405471, 179405586, 179405640, 179405948, 179417695, 179653651, 179653705, 179653821, 179654179, 179655390, 179655775, 179656162, 179656423, 179656570, 179656875, 179656938, 179663187, 179663216, 179663383, 179663460, 179663555, 179663624, 179663690, 179663758, 179663792, 179664213, 179708267, 179710725, 179711115, 179711149, 179711724, 179711842, 179711933, 179712199, 179712369, 179712548, 179712765, 179723099, 179723156, 179723225, 179723434, 179723535, 179723600, 179723650, 179724181, 179780468, 179780497, 179820100, 179821376, 179821815, 179821934, 179822885, 179823646, 179824386, 179824882, 179824933, 179824965, 179826668, 179826749, 179827281, 179827414, 179827700.
nevw (2026-03-14 04:57:26+00:00): Hi, this seems unsuitable for the osm map. Please add your date to a umap or similar
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ which you can share.
osmviborg (2026-03-14 07:08:46+00:00): tunnel=building_passage
NeisBot (2026-03-14 01:24:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 20 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1201847348 v2 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1488714846 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1488714856 v1 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/9042120425 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179833848
NeisReview (2026-03-22 05:33:17+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179882920
Comino (2026-03-14 08:13:56+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for your contribution to BTCmap. By sharing information about Bitcoin friendly businesses, you’re helping to support the Bitcoin community. Please be aware that using ALL CAPS is not allowed. 

I fixed that for you.
Please keep this in mind for future additions.
Thanks so much in advance!

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
Baloo Uriza (2026-03-14 22:31:45+00:00): " mph" must be specified when using legacy units instead of standard km/h.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179834045
Baloo Uriza (2026-03-14 22:19:40+00:00): 50 km/h is closer to like, 32 MPH.  You must include " mph" after the number if you intend legacy units instead of standard km/h.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179834055
Baloo Uriza (2026-03-14 22:37:21+00:00): Additionally, that way is tagged as closed.  The detour ways are tagged as 50 MPH.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179834055
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-03-14 02:44:18+00:00): Adjusted interchange*
nevw (2026-03-14 14:20:39+00:00): Why make the parking area a multipolygon?
It is invalid because outers can’t share sides.
Just use simple polygons where possible.
nevw (2026-03-14 14:22:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20320955#map=19/-35.292276/149.164475 is the problem
Sammyhawkrad (2026-03-14 09:41:07+00:00): Hi ERIC TWUM-UEW, it's bad practice to trace over existing objects and give them the same tags. There's no use for that. From recent imagery, there is a building here instead.
TrickyFoxy (2026-03-14 07:53:59+00:00): 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении
Udarian (2026-03-14 17:28:18+00:00): This changeset adds a duplicate business, next time edit existing features instead of adding a completely new business when one is already mapped. for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element . 

Happy mapping,
Udar.
Ross Ortiz (2026-03-16 22:56:46+00:00): are two sucursal
pwbriggs (2026-03-14 06:41:34+00:00): Thank you for the contribution.

However, I can't find any evidence that and retail locations have closed—my understanding of the changes effective 12 March 2026 are that the company is significantly cutting their factory operations, and focusing on retail at a narrower scope.

Could you please provide some documentation where I can read about this location being closed? I'll roll back this change for now, but if this retail location is in fact closed, please let me know!

Thanks again for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
rivermont (2026-03-18 00:08:05+00:00): As I have asked several times before, please stop using 'ref' tag for the state road tagging in North Carolina. The proper tag is 'unsigned_ref'
NeisBot (2026-03-14 06:18:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13646965136 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "HVAC contractor office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-22 11:33:06+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180244801
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 01:43:12+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and explicit source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184205136

https://osm.org/changeset/184205136
iandees (2026-03-14 13:38:54+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
NeisBot (2026-03-14 06:48:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13646958556 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Café ludique à Colombiers"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : « Café ludique à Colombiers »
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-22 11:33:09+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180244802
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
Supaplex (2026-03-14 07:47:50+00:00): Can you explain why you massly remove residential area in Fujian, China. It seems these area still exist.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179840520
CENTRALHUB (2026-05-07 04:51:55+00:00): Those area exists but most of them were mapped in extremely low quality, like some random terrible shapes in the map. None of the nodes align with the actual boundary of village. Such mapping makes no sense but give people feeling that OSM accepts low quality contribution like this.
Carto_Graph (2026-03-15 15:35:25+00:00): Добрый день. А зачем здание внутри здания?
grzegorz75jan (2026-03-25 12:33:50+00:00): Jaka ścieżka ? przecież to jest droga dojazdowa do garaży.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179841335
Warin61 (2026-03-15 01:01:47+00:00): And where does the Sydney to Melbourne XPT route 19744551 now run??? 
Was on Way: North Eastern Standard Gauge Line (135649140), Way: ARTC Standard Gauge Line (961587018) and Way: ARTC Standard Gauge Line (1484485186)
LachlanTansey2009 (2026-03-15 01:50:59+00:00): Sorry about that, ill fix the relation.
NeisBot (2026-03-14 07:15:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/8805033188 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Photo editing studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-22 11:33:12+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180244803
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
iandees (2026-03-14 13:39:12+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
海上升明月 (2026-03-15 09:27:32+00:00): Thanks a lot for fixing my accidental node drag! I'm new to OSM, and I'll be more careful to check my edits before submitting next time.
Frame&Focus (2026-06-06 11:20:27+00:00): Hi, thanks for contributing!

Please be careful with street renames. If you don't apply the rename to addresses on ways and nodes, it messes with routing and searching, and makes osmose very unhappy.

I resolved a few dozen osmose issues caused by the rename of National Ave South to South National Ave in 183733221. The resolution was reverting that rename since there were so many that would need updating.

Additionally, National Ave North was never renamed which caused a naming convention conflict.

This area should continue to use the [Highway Name] [Direction] format unless there is an open discussion about changing that convention.

Thanks again.
trial (2026-03-14 08:40:09+00:00): oneway=no est la valeur par défaut, inutile donc de le mettre sauf si on peut en douter (voie qui semble à sens unique).
Marek-M (2026-03-27 14:08:43+00:00): Opis edycji to kolejna bzdura. Strona internetowa nieprawidłowo przypisana do garażu.
Baloo Uriza (2026-03-14 22:18:26+00:00): Got your unit number situation fixed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179842600
trial (2026-03-14 08:37:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449129940 : oui le rail n'existe plus, c'est ce qu'indique railway=razed. Donc fixme n'a pas d'intérêt, c'est déjà ce qui est dit.
t_ja (2026-03-14 19:20:37+00:00): Ahoj,
prosím buď opatrnejší pri úpravách OSM dát, v tejto sade zmien si odmazal na objekte predstavujúcom hranicu mesta boundary=administrative, a pridal si nezmyselné tagovanie ako napr. surface="Betónové bloky", trail_visibility="Dobrá"!
Aj keď si zjavne chcel zakresliť nejaký chodník, tagovanie NIKDY nepoužíva slovenské názvy. Stačí si pozrieť OSM Wiki, kde je všetko zdokumentované, prípadne si z príslušnej stránky kliknúť vpravo dolu na odkaz "taginfo" a pozrieť používané hodnoty.

Tento vandalizmus som už opravil, ale vždy si treba pred uploadom zmien pozrieť, čo sa zmenilo. 

T.
Duški Kubov (2026-03-14 21:06:47+00:00): Ahoj, pravdepodobne šlo o úpravu ešte cez aplikáciu Go Map pre iOS - zistil som, že sa s ňou nedá pracovať dostatočne dobre (predsalen, cez mobil sa môže chytiť viac bodov). Všetky zmeny už realizujem normálne cez PC. Ďakujem za upozornenie.
dankarran (2026-03-14 11:41:51+00:00): Thanks for the update.

Please be careful when removing things as the building and address tags are still useful even if the business changes. 

I've restored the building and updated it to show Dominos.
dankarran (2026-03-14 11:44:51+00:00): Thanks for the update. Did you mean to delete the whole restaurant, or just the BTC tags? Is the place still there?
Y0ga (2026-03-14 12:45:35+00:00): So sorry, I just meant to delete the BTC tags, I will be more careful in future! Restaurant still there just not accepting Bitcoin.
dankarran (2026-03-14 17:42:08+00:00): No worries, I've fixed it up and taken off the BTC tags
Y0ga (2026-03-15 08:01:05+00:00): Oh perfect, Thanks for your time and help!
iandees (2026-03-14 13:39:26+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
eggie (2026-03-14 08:43:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Volgens mij heb je dat niet aangepast.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=179843727

Je zou dan oneway:bicycle=no 'moeten' toevoegen en evt ook voor moped en mofa.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-03-14 08:44:35+00:00): oneway=yes zie ik ook nergens staan.
eggie (2026-03-14 08:53:55+00:00): Heb je wellicht een andere kaart voor ogen? In OSM was dit nooit eenrichtingsverkeer. 
Wel is er een vrachtwagenverbod.
Sinds wanneer is dit eenrichtingsverkeer muv tweewielers?
groenhen (2026-03-14 09:29:15+00:00): Er is een lange periode aan deze weg gewerkt en er heeft een poos een bord gestand met een inrij verbod van noord naar zuid. Komoot pakt de route van noord naar  zuid niet. Dus vandaar mijn melding. Dit is mijn eerste melding. Misschien heb ik iets niet goed gedaan.
eggie (2026-03-14 09:35:07+00:00): Klopt 26 mrt jl heeft deze mapper het eenrichtingverkeer verwijderd uit OSM.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179554202#map=16/53.30429/6.60136

Het is dus nu weer correct.. alleen zal Komoot nog niet zijn bijgewerkt. In OSM is het nu correct.

Dezelfde mapper daarvoor had helaas niet oneway:bicycle=no toegevoegd in juli 2025.

Dus even geduld tot Komoot z'n update heeft gehad.

MVG
eggie
groenhen (2026-03-14 09:42:12+00:00): Dank voor je reactie

Mvg groenhen
eggie (2026-03-14 09:10:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Je hebt de naam van de winkel veranderd in Banksy museum?  De shop tag supermarket heb je laten staan.
De vraag s.. wat is het nu? Een winkel of een museum? En bestaat Jonker&Co niet meer?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-03-14 09:21:10+00:00): shop aangepast naar museum
mw014 (2026-05-05 18:40:44+00:00): pour le way/1488768746 je pense qu'on sera d'accord pour dire que le wiki offre pas de super solution ? Mais en soit ça rentre dans map_type=scheme
Possible de le réduire à un seul node pour ne pas affoler les capteurs ?
Ltrlg (2026-05-06 08:39:17+00:00): Il ne me semble pas y avoir de bonne raison objective pour que le wiki déconseille l’usage sur un chemin, car ce sont en général des objets relativement similaire physiquement à un advertising=board où c’est considéré comme valide.

Je n’ai pas l’impression qu’il y ait vraiment eu de discussion à ce sujet : la proposition originelle ne contenait que le point (et je ne vois pas de discussion de ce sujet), les aires ont été ajoutées en 2024 sur la base de _de facto_ (vraisemblablement non discuté). Bref, en l’état le wiki est plus une description de l’usage majoritaire que le reflet d’une décision communautaire.

Par conséquent, je ne considère pas que les inconvénients usuels des usages minoritaires (moins bien géré par les rendus / la QA / etc.) l’emportent nettement sur une donnée plus précise. On pourrait aussi juste modifier le wiki.
mw014 (2026-05-06 09:15:50+00:00): Ah bon ok
Oui c'est sûr, modifier le wiki donne aux nouveaux une chance de comprendre ce qu'il se passe... C'est considéré valide pour advertising=board pour ceux qui savent que c'est considéré valide 😅
Ltrlg (2026-05-06 09:35:50+00:00): Pour advertising=board, ce n’est effectivement pas décrit dans le corps de la page, mais c’est bien présent dans les données structurées et la boîte flottante en haut à droite de la page.
mw014 (2026-05-06 09:46:06+00:00): ah oui je n'ai pas le réflexe de regarder là !
merci pour les explications