piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2023-01-21 14:07:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131542242 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6781].
mavl (2023-01-21 14:07:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131542242 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6781].
mavl (2023-01-21 14:07:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131542242 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6781].
mavl (2023-01-21 14:06:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131542242 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6781].
mavl (2023-01-21 14:06:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131542242 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6781].
mavl (2023-01-21 14:06:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131542242 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6781].
habi (2023-01-23 13:57:44+00:00): Ciao Foexer

Du hast hier die Gebäude verschoben und an die Orthofotos angepasst.
Wenn du das machts, ist es amigs toll, wenn du die Gebäude noch rechtwinkling machst.
In iD (dem Standart-Edit-Programm von openstreetmap.org) geht das, indem du nach dem Zeichnen die 'Q'-Taste drückst.
Oder den Umriss mit der rechten Maustaste auswählst und 'rechtwinklig' machen auswählst.

Die Gebäude sehen an sich recht 'fertig' aus, kann die Baustelle (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/821329922/) entfernt werden?

Gruss,
habi
habi (2023-01-23 14:26:43+00:00): Ich habe die Gebäude hier angepasst:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131609318
mavl (2023-01-21 14:07:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131542242 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6781].
aceman444 (2023-04-01 07:17:30+00:00): building=yes to landuse=garages is not a good change, they have different meaning. And it seems the building with garages is still there, so it was wrong to remove it.
osmviborg (2023-01-20 08:51:19+00:00): At have 'farmyard' & 'surface' på samme way er en fejl. Dit brug af 'farmyard' er underlig. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmyard
MicDK (2023-01-21 11:12:49+00:00): Jeg tegner i 3D, og her gengives i visse tilfælde "surface". F4Demo gør det ikke, men jeg lægger i alle tilfælde surface på som en ekstra oplysning, såfremt andre for mig ukendte 3D-fremvisere gengiver forskelligheder i surface. Eller hvis F4Demo med tiden også skulle gøre det.

Under OpenStreetMapWiki læser jeg:

"surface=* - specifies the surface material of a feature such as a highway, parking lot, sporting pitch, or beach. It is used as a secondary tag for a main feature."

Så jeg kan ikke se, at noget tilsiger, at det er en fejl at angive surface på "farmyard". En fejl ville det først være, hvis man f.eks. unødvendigt angav "surface=grass" på "landuse=grass".
osmviborg (2023-01-21 11:32:51+00:00): Som jeg ser det tegner du for at opnå et bestemt resultat på standardkortet. Hvad med https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107910685 passer det med landuse=industrial
osmviborg (2023-01-21 12:39:02+00:00): landuse=residential https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411050504
MicDK (2023-01-21 19:35:42+00:00): Jeg tegner for at få en korrekt gengivelse i 3D, men standardkortet skal selvfølgelig ikke lide skade under det.

1) Der er både byggefirma og bolig på adressen, og "industrial" er benyttet på indkørslen som det "landuse", der passede bedst. Har du et bedre forslag til landuse, så skriv det gerne. 

2) Enig i at "landuse=residential" er unødvendigt og tilfører ingenting inde i en byzone, som i sig selv er residential. Den aktuelle tagning 5 år gammel, og jeg stoppet med at bruge for nogle år siden. Jeg sletter eller retter alle denne type tagninger ved lejlighed.
b-holdet (2023-01-23 13:44:18+00:00): Er det denne her du tegner på

https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=54.9969593&lon=10.5717875&zoom=19&camera.phi=92.35
MicDK (2023-01-23 15:20:57+00:00): Ja, det er det, "b-holdet" :-)
Langlaeufer (2023-01-20 10:33:36+00:00): hallo Christoph,

ist der Weg als Fußweg beschildert? Sonst dürfen da auch Radfahrer sicherlich auch Radfahrer lang und wir sollten es bei path belassen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131498007
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-06-10 08:42:49+00:00): @N11L0

Hello, could you tell why the [ref=virma] but not [branch=virma]？Becaust "virma" don't looks like a serial number but a place name. In other countries' McDonald's, ref key usually have values like 8104596/SN-02/BNB37 or others like that. (example only, does not actually exist) 

Thank you for reading this!

(To speed things up, I make this changes in advannce https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8178952337, if anything unsuitable you can revert it directly and don't forget to let me know)
silversurfer83 (2023-01-23 19:00:21+00:00): revert https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131620850
silversurfer83 (2023-01-23 19:06:15+00:00): Hallo Klaus-Peter: Wenn du als Quelle nur die im online editor verfügbaren Luftbilder nutzt, dann kannst du zumindest das Gebäude einzeichnen. Die Adresse darf aber nicht aus dem Geoportal entnommen werden. Bitte vor Ort erfassen

Grüße
silversurfer83
SekeRob (2023-02-26 22:13:41+00:00): Hi,

Can this broken and seemingly obsolete forest relation be deleted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2165957

With JOSM that should be rather quick to do

Ciao
NieWnen (2023-01-20 14:40:06+00:00): Reverted in 131511036.
Please do NOT tag incorrectly for the renderer.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

It is not in construction state yet.
silversurfer83 (2023-01-23 19:09:47+00:00): revert https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131621292
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-30 11:57:49+00:00): Hello!

You used
historic=monumentti
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10570086140/history

Have you maybe meant
historic=monument
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
ivanbranco (2023-02-01 18:43:30+00:00): Ciao Marius, benvenut su OSM

manca un tag che descriva fisicamente cos'è. Deduco un ufficio? Inoltre ora è mappato all'esterno, andrebbe spostato dentro all'edificio corretto.

Il sito non dovrebbe essere https://www.entersys.it/ invece di https://zeloerp.com ?
Marius Marolla (2023-02-02 08:57:12+00:00): Ciao Ivan,
grazie per la segnalazione! Purtroppo è stato il primo inserimento (un po' frettoloso). Ho corretto la posizione, ho modificato il tag della descrizione e corretto il sito web (zeloerp.com è il sito del prosotto e non dell'azienda).
Grazie 1000!
DD1GJ (2023-01-21 11:38:18+00:00): Es ist ein Kundenparkplatz. Zufahrt als privat gekennzeichnet. Router berücksichtigen das und nehmen die "Abkürzung" nicht.
Norman1983 (2023-01-25 09:10:51+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Information. Bei uns im Katasteramt kamen aber Beschwerden vom Eigentümer, der dort seine Parkfläche ausgewiesen hat, dass Ortsansässige den Weg dort als Abkürzung nehmen und Ortsfremde(Touristen) sich das abschauen. Zudem ist im Liegenschaftskataster kein Weg mit einer gesetzlichen Klassifizierung eingezeichnet.
DD1GJ (2023-01-26 08:17:23+00:00): Gern geschehen. OSM ist unabhängig von Katasterplänen. Die Mitwirkenden erfassen den vor Ort vorgefundenen Zustand.  OSM-basierte Router vermeiden den Parkplatzweg als Abkürzung, Bei Google Maps ist er überhaupt nicht vorhanden, aber Bing Maps (Here) und Apple schlagen den Parkplatz als Abkürzung vor.

Bereits vor über 20 Jahren sagte der Presseprecher eines großen deutschen Automobilkonzerns: "Ein Navigationssystem kann nicht die Intelligenz des Autofahrers ersetzen."

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=53.27446%2C12.81571%3B53.27494%2C12.81718#map=18/53.27544/12.81628
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-01-20 17:12:35+00:00): Tere, üleslaadimisel teile näidatakse warninguid. Palun ärge ignoreerige neid. Juhuslikult tegite Tedre tänava katki. Kuna "parkla" on lihtsalt osa era territooriumist kus tegelikult ei ole mingit eraldi parklat, ma kustutan teie muudatusi.

Lisada tuleb ainult just parkimiseks ettenähtud territoorimi, eramaja omanik võib seda erinevalt kasutada. Ka parkimiskohad peavad olema tähistatud teemärgistusega.

Kas saab teada mis üldse toimib? Kas see on mingi kodutöö koolis? On muidugi hea et on nii palju uusi kartograafe aga see et kohati tehakse tänavaid katki ei ole...
Jrachi (2023-01-20 09:22:55+00:00): Ciao.
Ieri avevo sistemato la relazione del 724, coreggendo i buchi che avevi lasciato e portando il percorso su quello che è stato rilevato.
Il rilievo è del 2010 quindi potrebbe essere variato.
Se è così va segnalato alla SOSEC perché il tracciato a catasto è quello che ho fatto io.
Mi sono accorto che tu hai creato un 724A che non esiste a catasto e che in sostanza è una parte del 724, mentre tu fai fare un giro diverso al 724, creando di fatto questo 724A.
So che sei uno che fa attenzione a riportare i percorsi come sono sul campo e mi viene il dubbio che dal 2010 si sia creata questa distinzione tra 724 e 724A.
Se mi confermi che il tracciato sul terreno ha indicazioni e cartelli come dici tu, faccio la segnalazione alla SOSEC per fare la revisione del percorso. C'è una sezione CAI che si occupa della segnaletica della zona?

Quando mi avrai confermato lo stato del percorso posso poi procedere a sistemare i tag della relazione.
"via"  non si può applicare in quanto non ci possono essere alternative sulla relazione di un sentiero CAI, se ci sono devono avere un numero diverso.
Fatto questo posso poi inserire il sentiero sul catasto sentieri nazionale e Infomont.

Ivo
Francoerbi41 (2023-01-20 09:53:34+00:00): Ciao, sto mappando chiese e cappellette in quella zona e facendo ciò mi sono continuamente imbattuto in questo percorso ed ho ritenuto interessante inserire la relazione mancante.
Consultando il sito del CAI di Varallo ho trovato sia le tracce GPX che le relazioni che riguardano entrambi i percorsi.
Se è come dici tu allora tu e il CAI di Varallo parlate due lingue diverse.
Le bandierine bianche e rosse che ho visto sul percorso sono tutte fresche, quindi recenti, inoltre mi sembra di ricordare che hanno fatto il rilievo l'anno scorso e dicono esplicitamente che hanno fatto delle modifiche perché è stata costruita una nuova strada.
Quindi penso che la cosa migliore sia che voi troviate un accordo su quale sia il percorso, da parte mia non c'è nussun problema ad adeguarmi alle decisioni della maggioranza.
Cordialità
Franco
Jrachi (2023-01-20 11:10:21+00:00): Credo che sia in CAI Varallo che non segue le direttive regionale.
Può farlo, ma i sentieri a catasto hanno delle proprietà che non hanno gli altri.
Non sono io che devo mettermi d'accordo con il CAI Varallo, ma sono loro che devono seguire la legge regionale e rivolgersi alla SOSEC per qualunque problema.
Ma questo è un problema del CAI Varallo, che vedo di contattare per questo caso e sentire se non hanno già avanzato la proposta di accatastamento e variazione.

Ivo
Ivo
Francoerbi41 (2023-01-20 14:43:16+00:00): Molto bene, speriamo si riesca a trovare la quadra in tempi brevi.
Ciao
Franco
Langlaeufer (2023-01-20 13:27:18+00:00): ich hab noch source:maxspeed entfernt. und maxspeed:type=DE:urban gesetzt
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131499562
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:27:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
habi (2023-01-23 14:07:55+00:00): Ciao Foexer

Es macht Sinn, Änderungen auf eine relativ kleine geographische Region zu beschränken.
Dann ist das An- und Durchschauen der Änderungen etwas einfacher.

Gruss aus Bern,
habi
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:36:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
aTarom (2023-01-20 10:34:52+00:00): Hola Ishero,
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7020349239/history
el tag
"pk"="1"
puede ser
"distance"="1"?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=milestone?uselang=en
En imágenes de StreetSide no veo la señal y por ello prefiero preguntar antes de tocar
Saludos y gracias por editar
Ishero (2023-01-20 19:06:25+00:00): Ha sido un error, estuve modificando la dirección de la Calle Serra i Moret, que ha pasado a ser de un único sentido, y me puse a probar un MOD de Señales y Guardé sin querer.

Ya lo he corregido!  SALUDOS!
user_1566574 (2023-01-21 13:47:07+00:00): Aouch, y'a tout cassé le gros polygone :(

Le rendu m'a alerté, tu veux que je retape ça ou tu gères ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:35:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
eggie (2023-01-20 12:00:54+00:00): Dag Tim

Wellicht 
leisure=sports_centre
sport=surfing

Het is gebruikelijk om op de adresnode bij te taggen. Je hoeft niet nogmaals een adres toe te voegen.
Ben je niet te vroeg met je toevoeging? 
MVG
eggie
jb54osm (2023-01-21 19:07:33+00:00): Op adresnode en nog wat zo.
tux67 (2023-01-20 11:45:43+00:00): Hi Nordmyra,
könntest du bei deinen Edits - im Sinne der Pflegbarkeit - bitte darauf achten, keine Landuse (oder ähnliche) Flächen mit Wegen zu verbinden?
Danke & Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131500870
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:15:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:49:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:48:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:19:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:31:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
mueschel (2023-01-23 11:07:34+00:00): Please check the socket tags you added recently. There are ~ 50 tags with a stray ':' at the end, e.g.
"socket:tesla_supercharger:output:"
cae42 (2023-01-23 12:34:39+00:00): Sorry it's a mistake
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:14:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:54:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:33:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
QZ5UJA0NDN (2023-01-20 10:32:33+00:00): Sure! I'll fix it.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:10:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Baloo Uriza (2023-01-20 12:58:21+00:00): Can we get some descriptive information in your changeset comments instead of swearing?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131502170
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:10:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:09:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Romwriter (2023-01-24 16:54:27+00:00): Woher stammt die 28219? Das amtliche Straßenverzeichnis nennt als Postleitzahl die 28217.
lberges (2023-01-25 21:47:52+00:00): Das amtliche Straßenverzeichnis enthält einige Fehler. Die aktuelle Version (Download mit Datum) ist bzgl. Lankenauer Straße schon formell fehlerhaft (von-bis ohne bis-Wert). Selbst wenn man das interpretiert, ist 28217 nicht logisch. Gleich umme Ecke ist die Fasia-Jansen-Str., lt. Straßenverzeichnis auch 28127. Beide Straße führt die Post mit 28219, was nach Lage der Dinge logisch ist, denn die Fasia-Str. ist eine Sackgasse, sie kann nur über die Lankenauer erreicht werden. Vgl. auch https://hafenkinder-bremen.de/kontakt/.
lberges (2023-01-25 21:54:53+00:00): Weitere Fehler im Straßenverzeichnis der Stadt Bremen: Mählandsweg, Waller Str, Felix-von-Eckardt-Str, Marktplatz Osterholz, Erwin-Liedtke-Weg,
Romwriter (2023-02-18 18:06:46+00:00): Okay: Ob das hier richtig ist, kann ich nicht überprüfen, aber dass das amtliche Straßenverzeichnis einige Fehler aufweist, davon hast Du mich überzeugt.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:07:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Jakka (2023-01-21 08:44:04+00:00): de ene is geen éénrichting meer dan zou oneway:bicycle=no eruit mogen.
Maar de andere is éénrichting geworden mogen daar de fietsers tegen verkeer in ? dan oneway:bicycle=no toevoegen Weet niet of snorfietsen ook door mogen?( onewy:mofa=no) enz....
BER319 (2023-02-10 07:28:39+00:00): Hallo WegefanHB,

ich möchte dich hiermit noch einmal bitte keine nicht vor Ort verifizierten building:levels und dergleichen zu erfassen. Was du zum teil hier einträgst stimmt nicht.
Vielen Dank
BER319
Koenindo (2023-01-21 00:23:40+00:00): non intentional touched the administrative boundaries in order to add/improve the ports (Siau island, Lembeh island, Tobelo city). how can this be fixed or reverted? Sorry
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131502702
ivanbranco (2023-02-01 18:28:45+00:00): Hi Mika,

why did you delete the service way in Via Angelo Parrilla?
TrickyFoxy (2023-01-22 15:02:09+00:00): 👋 Пожалуйста, обозначайте дороги, которые вы наносите, например, как Сервисные. А не как Автомагистрали:)

И не пишите, в названия дорог, что они ведут на свалки. Лучше нарисуйте на карте сами свалки😉
Jakka (2023-01-21 08:37:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30166171
Door access=no op te zetten is deze totaal niet toegankelijk. ook voetgangers, fietsers zel laden en lossen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
gurglypipe (2023-01-20 11:56:31+00:00): Hi, what sources are you using to determine the ‘correct’ position of the summit and trig point?

This is the 4th time in a row you’ve ‘corrected’ the position of the trig point/summit. Which position is actually correct?
user_16720371 (2023-01-20 11:59:43+00:00): This one. The last one was slightly off. Is that OK Sir?
user_16720371 (2023-01-20 12:00:51+00:00): It was in the correct position the first time I moved until some bright spark moved it last week..
gurglypipe (2023-01-20 12:02:49+00:00): Hi, thanks for replying. How are you determining the correct position? Based on the Bing satellite imagery in the editor, or by a settled GPS reading off the trig point?
trigpoint (2023-01-20 12:55:11+00:00): Please split your edits into sensible areas, at a maximum a country at a time.
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-21 09:10:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131516442, 131526374, 131530757, 131528834, 131521894, 131510103 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy mass edit
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-21 09:10:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131516442, 131526374, 131530757, 131528834, 131521894, 131510103 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy mass edit