piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Metzor (2023-09-10 14:02:39+00:00): Hi BitumeLourd,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) 

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
xronos (2023-09-13 23:49:42+00:00): по нему куча людей ездит же))
indidan (2023-09-14 05:46:39+00:00): Маршрут не выдуманный, он тщательно разработанный, задокументированный.
https://www.tourunite.info/p/tracks.html
По нему сотни людей ездят.
Версия Вышневолоцкая сегмента устаревшая, текущая идёт не через Кириши, а через Новгород.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141050383
xronos (2023-11-19 09:22:37+00:00): https://t.me/ruosm/780700
surveyor54 (2023-09-10 15:31:42+00:00): Hallo v10k,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap. Schön, dass du bei uns mitmachst.

Openstreetmap ist doch ein komplexeres Thema. Hier mal zum besseren Verständnis: OpenStreetMap ist keine Karte, sondern eine Live-Datenbank, die von vielen
 Personen aber auch anderen Projekten verwendet wird. So werden unsere Daten z.B. auch von Routern für Autofahrer (Navis), Radler, Wanderer aber auch Sehbehinderten verwendet. 
Aus diesen Daten werden von verschieden Anbietern Karten gerendert, wie z. B. Mapnik, so wird die Karte auf der Hauptseite von OSM bezeichnet. Siehe auch hier:
 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Mapnik
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=11/50.1206/8.7342
 
Es gibt dann noch das Forum, hier kann man Fragen stellen, die kompetenten Kollegen versuchen zu beantworten.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56

Dann sollte man sich das Wiki einmal anschauen, hier wird das Tagging zu einzelnen Objekten erklärt. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Hauptseite?uselang=de

Jetzt zu diesem Ändeungssatz:
Wenn sich Gebäude in der Form verändert haben, nicht löschen, sondern die Form korrigieren, wegen der Historie des Eintrags.
Einen Namen nur Vergeben, wenn es auch der "echte" Name ist und nicht nur eine Bezeichnung.

Private Parkplätze u. Swimmingpools sollten eigentlich nicht im OSM eingetragen werden. An die Swimmingpools sollte auf jeden Fall access=privat.

Wenn du noch Fragen hast, bitte melde dich.

Gruß
surveyor54
ivanbranco (2023-09-10 09:32:24+00:00): What's happening here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206352188/history

I see you keep delete and revert with another user? maybe is better to talk with each other instead of editwarring
NieWnen (2023-09-10 12:12:35+00:00): @ivanbranco, just report this vandal. 

There is no sense to ask anything. Check more changesets comments or even only the latest one 
(141059308).
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-10 08:00:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11180560232
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206552414

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Metzor (2023-09-10 13:59:23+00:00): Hi GimmeMa,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) 

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Please also habe a look at this page as you use StreetComplete:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#A_changeset_made_with_StreetComplete_covers_a_massive_area%2C_why_is_this%3F_How_can_it_be_prevented%3F
GimmeMa (2023-09-10 14:19:55+00:00): Hey, yeah sorry I am new to this. I tried out StreetComplete a while ago and did not create an account at first. All my entries where made while I was at/near this place. For italy/Bavaria/Austria I was on vacation.
Metzor (2023-09-10 14:00:00+00:00): Hi GimmeMa,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) 

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Please also habe a look at this page as you use StreetComplete:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#A_changeset_made_with_StreetComplete_covers_a_massive_area%2C_why_is_this%3F_How_can_it_be_prevented%3F
GimmeMa (2023-09-10 14:20:58+00:00): Hey, yeah sorry I am new to this. I tried out StreetComplete a while ago and did not create an account at first. All my entries where made while I was at/near this place. For italy/Bavaria/Austria I was on vacation.
Frans S (2023-09-10 13:11:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please check a trace carefully before you decide how to map it.
It is a river instead of a road.
I changed it.
Best regards
Frans S (2023-09-10 13:15:32+00:00): Hi.  Tag a waterway as a stream when you can jump over it. (max 2-3 mtr)
Otherwise as a river
best regards
ynx (2023-09-10 14:06:07+00:00): Этот участок не открыт.
literan (2023-09-11 07:05:11+00:00): geo_17, откат. Не надо неоткрытые участки делать открытыми.
4004 (2023-09-10 23:15:44+00:00): Добрый день, спасибо за правку.
спортплощадка? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11180586117
Kovoschiz (2023-09-11 05:11:06+00:00): Please at least add `bicycle=yes` back to them. And I find `*cn_=yes` more proper and informative.
eggie (2023-09-10 10:16:45+00:00): Dag Jos... Je hebt de highway tag verwijderd Dus er is geen weg meer in OSM.
Maar die Beekseweg is er toch gewoon? 
Ook een oprit hoef je niet te verwijderen, maar kun je de tag highway=service service=driveway meegeven met access=private.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141053023
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-10 10:20:19+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk.. 
Dat stukje weg zonder straatnaam (Beekseweg?) dat je hebt ingetekend heb je geplakt op die lege way met alleen maar tracktype= grade4
eggie (2023-09-10 10:29:48+00:00): De verwijderde highwaytag highway=track heb ik hersteld.
Straatnaam Beekseweg toegevoegd.
MVG
eggie
Tomas Straupis (2023-09-11 12:19:11+00:00): Laba diena. Šis pakeitimas sugadino anksčiau gerai pažymėtas objektų pozicijas. Įtariu, kad buvo žymėta pagal Mikrosofto (Bingo) ortofoto prieš tai nepakoregavus jo pozicijos.
Kovoschiz (2023-09-11 05:10:29+00:00): You haven't fixed it. At most, there is a `route=hiking` . No `route=mtb` .
Snusmumriken (2023-09-10 09:39:44+00:00): You need to stop this edit war. I don't care one iota about the fate of that tag. But you have to come to some other resolution with your opponent, not just reverting back and forth
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-11 05:54:27+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out! I am monitoring bot account bot not noticed this edit war.

I asked now at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141087015 and will stop this bot edit for now.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-12 03:09:25+00:00): I have received reply that they updated their bot.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-20 08:22:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10902156805/history problem seems to be fixed now

I will restart bot now

(note, there was also some discussion on mailing list on this topic)
Frans S (2023-09-13 10:31:26+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. Your mappings are quite accurate.
Just a remark. There are tracks tagged on roads, connecting settlements. 
Depending on the width of that road, they should be tagged as unclassified or path. 
Best regards
Frans S (2023-09-10 11:12:41+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing into the mapping.
Each building need to be mapped. The area tagged as residential is not sufficient.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141053576
Frans S (2023-09-10 11:09:03+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key, The Imagery is taken under an angle, so the buildings don't seem to be fair square, however, they mostly are. Please square them.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141053634
leojth (2023-09-10 10:01:50+00:00): Multiple outers has benefits and is valid mapping. If your only goal is to replace these, please stop. But if you are improving the map, you are, of course, free to use single/overlapping outers.
SomeoneElse (2023-09-10 10:25:05+00:00): Hello,
Andy from the DWG here.  Generally speaking, whenever it's been discussed, most people have preferred using multipolygons only when necessary (because an inner and and outer is needed, or because of way node limits).
If I am mapping in an area and adding new features I definitely would replace "unnecessary" multipolygons in this way.  
It makes sense to discuss the pros and cons of different sorts of mapping over at the forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/se/49 .  It's a shame that archie didn't seem to make any attempt to do that before their first revert at 141032853 .
In this case, it'd be good to know what the benefits of the "multiple outer" approach is, and the forum is surely the best place to talk about that.
Best Regards,
Andy
Best Regards,
Andy
Wulfmorn (2023-09-10 13:23:14+00:00): Yet you did start an edit war when you condemned another user's work as "useless" and decided yours was just excellent and worthy of an edit war.

It is perfectly valid for several areas to share a tag (multiple outer), especially if there is an area of sameness with interruptions (such as roads or rivers). If it's exactly "beneficial" - I don't know, but what's beneficial with not doing it? When to stop using the relation and to create a new relation is up to the common sense of the user - where I myself have gone quite too far on several occasions I admit :o

However, the argument that it is "hard to use with iD" is not a good reason to pull apart someone else's work. 
Use the appropriate tool for the work, or leave it alone.
Warin61 (2023-09-10 23:18:08+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM!

Some hints? 
Relation 16309539 - multipolygon (shop) makes no sense. 

First a multipolygon relation must make a closed area. 

Next the tag shop=yes does not convey much information. 
I have deleted this.

Relation 16309540 'Centre Pharmacy' ... That does not need to be a relation. I have made it a simple way. The 'name' looks to be a 'description' rather than a name? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

And finally ... buildings don't go inside buildings... The shopping center is the outside of the building, the others are contained within the single building. The OSM guide is 'one feature = one OSM entry' .. note the word guide.. it is broken from time to time.
Frans S (2023-09-10 10:20:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please map the buildings inside a residential area as well !
Please do not connect nodes of buildings to each other and avoid mapping clustered building. Each building should be mapped individual.
Best regards
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141053759
Jrachi (2023-09-11 06:28:01+00:00): Ciao.
Interessante il route_marker, mi mancava...
Avrei due dubbi:
1) il ref che hai inserito sul nodo è il ref del percorso non della targhetta (personalmente ne ho posate a centinaia di quel tipo, e migliaia del tipo nuovo a rombo)
2) route_marker come ruolo mi sembra poco sensato. Oltre che non previsto; dopotutto essendo un percorso segnalato è obbligatorio ci siano dei segnali, a vernice, targhette o paline di vario tipo.
Pensandoci. La segnaletica su un sentiero CAI/italiano si divide in verticale (le classiche frecce fissate su un palo, ma anche su un muro o roccia) e orizzontale (gli ancor più classici bolli a vernice bianco rossi, usati su tutto il territorio nazionale (esclusa la Val d'Usta).
Ora per i primi che sono messi su inizio, fine o incroci è corretto inserirli sulla relazione come guidepost.
I secondi sono anonimi, servono a definire la continuità del percorso e sono una caratteristica d'insieme che va taggata come proprietà della way, ovvero trailblazed.
Effettivamente queste targhette hanno l'informazione in più che le legano al percorso perché riportano il ref o logo dell'itinerario.
Bisognerebbe discuterne in sede più ampia.

Ivo
Glassman (2023-09-10 18:54:38+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141053866
Frans S (2023-09-10 10:17:54+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
Please map each building individually. 
Residential areas are to be mapped around a settlement, village or group of minimal 4 buildings.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141053868
Frans S (2023-09-10 10:15:46+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: * Multiple buildings have been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
E: Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141053914
Frans S (2023-09-10 10:11:18+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
E. Buildings not squared.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141054000
Frans S (2023-09-10 11:06:19+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.
G: include the shadow of a building in the mapping.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141054247
Frans S (2023-09-10 11:04:08+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
When mapping residential areas, please do not cross buildings.
Also use the Bing imagery for a better view. You cam map more accurate from Bing.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141054448
NKA (2023-09-12 18:57:31+00:00): Ser at du prøver en N50-import som ikke har gått så bra. Validation i Søndre Land gir nå 9500 errors og 56000 warnings.

Det ser ikke ut til at arbeidsprosessen på import-siden er brukt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Topography_import_for_Norway

Jeg tror dette må rulles tilbake (revert). Klarer du det selv ellers skal DWG hjelpe?
Ansgar G Grimsrud (2023-09-12 20:05:30+00:00): Hvordan reverserer man alt på meg fra en gitt dato? Trodde man kunne endre litt etter litt men den gang ei ;) Får ta hele kommunen etter boka, hvilke verktøy bruker du for og finne disse feilene, regner med det er skript av noe slag?
NKA (2023-09-12 20:15:49+00:00): Ta kontakt med DWG. De har verktøy for å reversere store mengder, mange endringssett.

Importverktøyene står i prosessbeskrivelsen. Men kanskje dette ikke er noe for deg.
Ansgar G Grimsrud (2023-09-12 20:25:38+00:00): Hehe, får prøve oppskriften, dataene i kartet i Søndre Land er så dårlige at det er pinlig, får eventuelt be om at noen sjekker dataene før jeg laster dem opp på nytt, har sendt en mail DWG så da regner jeg med at det blir fixet.
NKA (2023-09-13 09:44:07+00:00): Fint om du venter med å legge inn nye ting til DWG er ferdig. Ser bare ett endringssett som er rullet tilbake ennå, så da gjenstår det over 100.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 05:03:55+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365857
Frans S (2023-09-10 11:01:54+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Please use also the Bing imagery, Is clearer to map from. Check that the situation on Bing and Esri are equal. ( Esri prevails)
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141054727
martien-176 (2023-09-10 10:33:40+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping. 

Please avoid mapping several buildings as one building. Every building must be traced separately. Zoom in as close as possible to see the outline of the buildings, hit each corner of the building carefully. Look for shadows, open ground, changes in roof color and vegetation to differentiate buildings.

Also pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. 

Please watch these 2 short video for more info: 
-Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
-Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ 

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141054764
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 05:03:39+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365854
Luzandro (2024-10-17 17:32:45+00:00): Hallo,

du hast hier bei zahlreichen Übergängen die Gehsteigkanten auf kerb=raised gesetzt, tlw. auch von kerb=lowered auf =raised geändert, obwohl die meisten tatsächlich abgesenkt sein dürften? Siehe bspw.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11119906052/history#map=19/48.199017/16.387393&layers=N

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=18.799388060970365&lat=48.19912733487621&lng=16.387382915229523&pKey=1020800016441541&focus=photo&x=0.31512352463723314&y=0.5310142692925254&zoom=0.9503695881731784

https://www.wien.gv.at/stadtplan/grafik.aspx?lang=de-AT&bookmark=NO19RkyrG0Z7XhxE4BCQQ-a5RpllkYHKmmkeu25v6MZj6Cg-b-b
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141055007
Frans S (2023-09-10 10:52:23+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping .
The buildings themselves need to be mapped as well,
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141055095
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 05:03:35+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365851
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 05:03:27+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365849
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 05:03:21+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365848