piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Disgiunzione (2025-02-27 23:55:51+00:00): I’m not entirely sure what SEO-related content involves. The owner of this shop is a friend of mine, and I primarily update the information. For instance, I copied the description from Google Maps. Additionally, I changed the name from "Minisini" to "Drogheria Minisini" because that is the correct name displayed on the shop sign, which can be verified using Google Street View.
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-28 14:51:07+00:00): Thank you for your prompt response and for clarifying that the location is for a legitimate business. I appreciate your contribution to the map!

The reason why your changeset was flagged is that the description used is quite detailed and reads similarly to promotional content, which can sometimes be interpreted as SEO-related.

To keep OSM useful and neutral, it’s best to provide concise and factual descriptions without promotional language. A simpler version would be more suitable and help avoid any misunderstandings.

Thanks once again for your understanding and for helping to keep the map accurate and useful!
rskedgell (2025-02-27 10:56:38+00:00): Thank you for adding your business to OpenStreetMap, which I have moved to the correct location on the corner of George Lane and Pulteney Road.

You may wish to reconsider opening_hours=24/7 unless your premises really are open to walk-in customers at all times. Obviously your website is always open, but that isn't useful information on a map.

Your SEO spam in the changeset comment is somewhat irritating, however renaming a section of George Lane and adding your business to the 55 bus route relation were nothing short of vandalism. This has been reverted.
rskedgell (2025-02-27 10:59:06+00:00): PS Your business is now mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2091318064 (merged with the node for the previous occupier of no. 68/68a).
Firefishy (2025-02-27 18:38:04+00:00): My preference would not be to support spammers and vandalism.
rskedgell (2025-02-27 19:45:00+00:00): @Firefishy had it been the unverifiable office of an online business, I would have just reverted. However, whether I approve of their business methods or not, it is a verifiable shop which can be visited and as such still belongs in OSM. Bing street side imagery shows a travel agent at that location, with a different name but the same phone number on the sign.

Obviously, I flagged the account to DWG for spam. The shop deserves to be on OSM, the account responsible doesn't.
Ilovemap1999 (2025-02-28 07:18:38+00:00): Em ơi sửa lại tag relation đúng nhé
GrabVN_HHanh (2025-02-28 10:02:32+00:00): vâng ạ
NeisBot (2025-02-27 10:06:01+00:00): Hi Andsand, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 47 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

PS: I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
NeisBot (2025-02-27 17:01:08+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-13 12:50:13+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163032685
NeisBot (2025-02-27 17:02:30+00:00): Hi Nigina Lolakova, and thank you for your contributions to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear, difficult to understand, or consistently repetitive.

For collaboration within the OSM community, it’s helpful to provide comments that explain the changes you’ve made. This helps others follow your work more easily. You can find some useful tips for writing clear and effective changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks for your attention to this.

PS: I’ve also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#ClearComments
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-27 19:40:26+00:00): Wow, what a creative use of hashtags! 

I almost thought I was reading a social media post instead of an OSM changeset comment. If only there were a way to explain what exactly was mapped or edited—imagine how much easier it would be for others to follow along. But hey, who needs clarity when you can have an alphabet soup of project codes, right?
</ironie>

#hotosm
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-28 14:24:06+00:00): I must now apologize retrospectively for my previous comment. It was sent too quickly by me out of emotion, without taking enough time to think it over. I would be glad if you continued to actively contribute to the OSM project. 

#HappyMapping
eggie (2025-02-27 15:40:41+00:00): Dag André   Je gebruikte foto's zijn geen satellietfoto's, maar luchtfoto's.
PDOK latest in josm is de meest recente. 
De afhandeling van highway=residential  (door een woonwijk) is identiek aan unclassified.
Door een woonwijk lijkt me residential met meest passend. 

MVG
eggie
czebureks (2025-12-17 08:34:04+00:00): Cześć! Dzięki za wkład w mapowanie terenów stoczniowych. Mam pytanie, czy ten budynek powstał jakoś niedawno: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1363293228 ? Pytam, bo nie ma go na najnowszym podkładzie Esri z początku tego roku. Pozdrawiam
nurdafur (2025-03-13 11:05:14+00:00): Hallo Rogtay
Schön, dass du auch mit Kartogradieren begonnen hast. 
In diesem Änderungssatz hast du die Straße Ebbinghoff umgelegt. Ich bin da zufällig darauf gestoßen, weil ich an der Wanderroute X12 gearbeitet habe, die an dieser Straße langführt.
Ich schreibe dir, weil durch deine Umlegung eine Lücke in der Wanderroute entstanden ist. Zudem ist auch die Straße nicht mehr mit dem Rad- und Fußweg verbunden. Ich korrigiere gleich den Straßenverkehr anhand des vdop-Luftbildes und korrigiere oben genanntes. Dort ist der Verlauf schon andeutungsweise zu sehen.
Aller Anfang ist schwierig. Auch ich habe zu Beginn nicht alles korrekt gemacht.
Deshalb Liebe Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Kartografieren 
Urs
philippec (2025-02-27 12:02:30+00:00): Is de AED zichtbaar van buiten.  In dit geval is er kans dat ik een foto ga nemen.
Het adres wordt in OSM moeilijker weergegeven met drie velden.
addr: city street en housenumber
VioletJunglist (2025-02-27 12:25:04+00:00): De AED hangt binnen. Maar het betreft een openbare plaats. Volgens mij mag je indien de sporthal geopend is een foto nemen langs binnen.
philippec (2025-02-27 13:05:59+00:00): Ja, dat doe ik als er niet te veel volk is.
Maar ik passeer soms buiten de openingsuren.
eggie (2025-02-27 11:10:37+00:00): Dag Anoniempje9,

De description=....  is verwijderd. Dat wordt gezien als spam in OSM.

MVG
eggie
Jrachi (2025-02-28 09:25:40+00:00): Ciao, benvenuto nella mappa più bella del mondo.
Ho corretto la tua relazione perché presentava due lacune, un piccolo tratto di strada ed un ponte.
Vedo che sei nuovo e cominci con le relazioni che sono una mappatura tra le più difficili su OSM.
Se utilizzi iD (l'editor on line) diventa difficile tenere in sequenza i membri e se fai aggiunte progressive non ti accorgi di non avere inserito un piccolo ponte.

Ivo
filippo lanciani (2025-02-28 13:24:51+00:00): ciao, grazie Ivo.
aimè sono alle prime armi, purtroppo come manuale ho solo una scarna guida fornita dal CAI per fare l'accatastamento dei sentieri. ma copiando da altri più o meno riesco
Jrachi (2025-03-01 12:17:45+00:00): Per qualunque dubbio non esitare a contattarmi.
Ivo
monhiko (2025-02-27 12:32:44+00:00): 尊敬的“CNHighways”：

您好！

您最近在靖西的编辑已查阅，总体而言对于这类补充公开公路网，是表示允许并欢迎的，因为这有助于对于我国公路相关的科学研究，只要您能遵守《公开地图表示规定（2023年版）》的相关内容，一般而言您的任何行为不会受到中国mapper们的监控。

另外，在更改城区道路前请在三确认城区道路是否已经有相关人员负责并与其进行事先联系沟通，否则会被当地mapper视为破坏行为并上报至DWG处。

最后，靖西市内的“靖孟线”即您所编辑的“靖西-孟麻公路”，请注意合并同类项。

祝您画的开心！

2024年2月27日
flohoff (2025-02-27 10:47:07+00:00): Moin,
hab gerade deinen Changeset gesehen. Cool das du mit mappst.

Aus deinem Changeset kommentar wird nicht so ganz klar warum du das geändert hast.

Ist die Barmer GEK da ausgezogen und Profamilie ein?

Flo
marvinjoe (2025-02-27 10:55:49+00:00): Hey Flo,

ich habe heute eher zufällig geschaut, was bei OSM zu pro familia in Bünde steht.
Die Barmer ist hier seit ca 10 Jahren nicht mehr drin und ist nur noch in Herford.

Liebe Grüße
Marvin
fortera_au (2025-02-28 00:32:48+00:00): Hey there, good work! One suggestion would be to press Q to square off any building you draw, it should handle the 45 degree angles fine in iD as well.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163006483
Turbotraveller115 (2025-02-28 00:45:28+00:00): Okay thanks I'll keep that in mind next time I edit.
eggie (2025-02-27 16:01:56+00:00): Dag Anoniempje

phone:mobile=+31...
Begin ook altijd met +31

MVG
eggie
berndw (2025-02-28 14:55:33+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap

Wenn die Quelle nicht nachvollziehbar ist oder wie hier wahrscheinlich nicht verwendbar, dann bitte keinen Namen eintragen.

Ich habe bei einer Websuche nur Ergebnisse gefunden, die direkt zu Google Maps führen und die sich sehr nach SPAM anhören.

Ich werde den Namen daher wieder entfernen.
surveyor54 (2025-02-27 11:11:49+00:00): Korrektur source:
nach OSM-Wiki; Homepage der Gemeinde Weinbach
canfe (2025-05-15 17:09:59+00:00): non credo che sia flowerbed l'aiuola spartitraffico vicino a Villa Taranto.
Non è solo grass?
silversurfer83 (2025-02-27 15:08:18+00:00): Moin Ralf,

die Eigenschaft "playground:theme=playground" hat einen Hintergedanken und sollte nicht einfach gelöscht werden.
Welchen Grund hast du, diese Eigenschaft zu löschen?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163006901
starsep (2025-04-01 18:36:45+00:00): Notatka związana z tą zmianą: https://osm.org/note/4691972
kuhni74 (2025-02-27 11:09:43+00:00): merci vielmals!
rempshaener (2025-02-27 18:48:37+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich hätte dann direkt eine Gegenfrage. Im Änderungssatzkommentar fragst du, ob hier Fahrräder erlaubt sind, hast das bicycle=no aber bereits entfernt. Was genau möchtest du denn überprüfen lassen?

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
flohoff (2025-02-28 17:44:08+00:00): Moin,
"Privatweg - Durchfahrt verboten" ist aber nicht access=private.

Das Privatweg ist operator:type=private und das durchfahrt verboten wäre vehicle=destination. Weil BEfahren oder Laufen ist ja erlaubt (Fahren kann man nur mit Fahrzeugen) 

Am besten ist es auch immer den genauen Wortlaut der Beschilderung als "note:access" auf die wege zu packen damit man das noch nachvollziehen kann.

Das problem mit access=private ist das das wie ein "access=no" ist - D.h. formal darf dann selbst der Postbote, Müllabfuhr, Taxi, Schulbus, Pizzabote da nicht rein.

Flo
qugeb (2026-01-24 14:21:36+00:00): friendly reminder.
s.a. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5141299
eggie (2025-02-27 11:17:34+00:00): Dag GenericUser,

Heeft deze speeltuin werkelijk een Engelse naam?
name=... is wat rendert op de kaart.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-27 11:19:19+00:00): De Leemkuil staat al als speeltuin op de kaart (vlak)
Duplikaat verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
habi (2025-02-27 11:11:37+00:00): Die zwei Silos mit den fehlenden Addressdaten haben noch gefehlt.
Brummelwuff (2025-02-27 16:09:14+00:00): Hallo, die Hast wen Weghttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/94099728 mit bicycle=no getagt, was hat sich da seit frühjahr 2024 das dort keine Fahrräder fahren dürfen? Immerhin laufen dort 5 Radrouten drüber.
rogtay (2025-02-27 16:28:37+00:00): Sorry hatte nicht gesehen das die Straße auch das erste Stück mit betrifft, bitte mal ein 2 Teile teilen, der Erste Teil wenn man von Varlar kommt geht, das gerade Stückdurch den Wald geht nicht
NeisBot (2025-02-27 17:01:13+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
citrula (2025-02-27 22:46:06+00:00): I reverted this edit because you added this to a drainage ditch. Please do the built-in tutorial and try again.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163031125
NeisBot (2025-02-27 17:02:58+00:00): Hi STREETGUYS, and thank you for your contributions to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear, difficult to understand, or consistently repetitive.

For collaboration within the OSM community, it’s helpful to provide comments that explain the changes you’ve made. This helps others follow your work more easily. You can find some useful tips for writing clear and effective changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks for your attention to this.

PS: I’ve also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#ClearComments
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-27 19:42:27+00:00): Wow, what a creative use of hashtags! 

I almost thought I was reading a social media post instead of an OSM changeset comment. 

If only there were a way to explain what exactly was mapped or edited—imagine how much easier it would be for others to follow along. 

But hey, who needs clarity when you can have an alphabet soup of project codes, right?

</ironic>
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-28 14:24:15+00:00): I must now apologize retrospectively for my previous comment. It was sent too quickly by me out of emotion, without taking enough time to think it over. I would be glad if you continued to actively contribute to the OSM project. 

#HappyMapping
mavl (2025-05-13 15:09:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
NeisBot (2025-02-27 17:03:06+00:00): Hi Capraa7teste, and thank you for your contributions to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear, difficult to understand, or consistently repetitive.

For collaboration within the OSM community, it’s helpful to provide comments that explain the changes you’ve made. This helps others follow your work more easily. You can find some useful tips for writing clear and effective changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks for your attention to this.

PS: I’ve also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#ClearComments
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-27 19:42:35+00:00): Wow, what a creative use of hashtags! 

I almost thought I was reading a social media post instead of an OSM changeset comment. 

If only there were a way to explain what exactly was mapped or edited—imagine how much easier it would be for others to follow along. 

But hey, who needs clarity when you can have an alphabet soup of project codes, right?
</ironic>
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-28 14:24:26+00:00): I must now apologize retrospectively for my previous comment. It was sent too quickly by me out of emotion, without taking enough time to think it over. I would be glad if you continued to actively contribute to the OSM project. 

#HappyMapping
woodpeck (2025-06-18 10:40:32+00:00): Dear Mehmet Bey, can you tell me the source of this edit? Is there a sign on the building that explains this is "Aliağa Kaymakamlık Lojmanı"? Is this a government office or a private residence?
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-06-18 18:48:17+00:00): Hello Woodpeck. 

Lojman in Turkish means “a house provided or given by an organization to its officials or workers for free or for a small rent.” “Kaymakamlık” is the administrative unit of a "ilçe"(may be translated ilçe=district, i am not sure) in Türkiye. “Kaymakamlık lojmanı” is the house allocated to district governors during their term of office. There are no signs outside these houses. These houses aren't government offices. They are just houses.

Many of this person's changes are about district governorship(in Turkish: kaymakamlık) buildings and district governorship houses(kaymakamlık lojmanı) in Türkiye. I asked Pelin Sungur, who I think is the same person, “what is the source of the district governorship houses you added”. https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=22006507
But he didn't respond. 

I think that “Mehmet Bey”(user id=22152243) and “Pelin Sungur”(user id=22006507) are the same person. This person (or persons) has also attracted attention and was discussed in OpenStreetMap Türkiye Facebook group and OpenStreetMap Türkiye Telegram group. https://t.me/osm_tr/11798 

As far as I know, there is no public address and location information list of the district governorship houses(kaymakamlık lojmanı). The source of the information he added may not comply with OpenStreetMap's data license.

Have a nice day.
BBJIB (2025-03-04 14:12:29+00:00): Hi, thank you for your contributions! Pease keep your changes local and upload them before moving on to another city or country.
StC (2025-03-27 22:31:36+00:00): Bonjour,

sauf erreur ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je tente la réparation.
aixbrick (2025-02-28 07:06:11+00:00): Hallo,
bitte beachte, dass
1. Straßensperrungen in OSM nur erfasst werden sollten, wenn sie mindestens einige Monate dauern (mehr als 3 Monate ist ein guter Richtwert). Ich finde zu dieser Maßnahme keinen konkreten Zeitraum, daher kann ich hier nicht beurteilen, ob die Eintragung in OSM sinnvoll ist.
2. durch das Ändern auf hw=cobstruction hier keinerlei Routing mehr funktioniert, auch nicht für Fußgänger. Straßenbaustellen erlauben es aber i.d.R., dass Fußgänger den Bereich passieren können und Fahrzeuge (Anlieger) zumeist bis zur eigentlichen Baustelle fahren dürfen. Daher wäre es besser, den Baustellenabschnitt statt mit hw=construction mit den tatsächlichen Beschränkungen (meistens vehicle=destination oder motor_vehicle=destination zu taggen, vgl. z.B. in Venwegen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110246591.
hw=construction ist eher für Straßen gedacht, die gerade neu gebaut werden oder während der Bauphase definitiv für niemanden nutzbar sind.
Gruß
MGA_AC (2025-02-28 07:23:20+00:00): Moin, die Straße ist einen Meter tief weggebaggert… 3 Monate wären in Deutschland ein Traum… ;-) Alaaf
aixbrick (2025-02-28 08:28:59+00:00): Das heißt auf 250m gibt es keine Straße mehr und selbst zu Fuß kann man die anliegenden Häuser nicht mehr erreichen?
MGA_AC (2025-02-28 09:48:54+00:00): So sieht das aus. Bürgersteige sind auch weg. Natürlich kommt man zu Fuß zu seinem Haus, knöcheltief im Dreck. Rollstuhl und Co. sind in der Tat ziemlich eingeschränkt zur Zeit.
aixbrick (2025-02-28 11:00:09+00:00): Alles klar, dann passt das Tagging natürlich :-).
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-02-27 21:11:56+00:00): Danke! :-)
NinaNesterovaOSM (2025-02-27 13:18:58+00:00): There is a disused shop, named K Shop, which now e-cigarette.
In this changeset you have modified a vape shop. Why?
SomeoneElse (2025-02-27 13:34:56+00:00): Hello, do you mind if I ask a personal question - are you a human?
NinaNesterovaOSM (2025-02-28 06:29:40+00:00): Yes, I am a human.
SomeoneElse (2025-02-28 13:36:53+00:00): Your question "why" was, I believe answered quite fully by the history of the object and the changeset tags here.  That's why I asked the question above.

May I ask what brought this edit and the others at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/NinaNesterovaOSM/changeset_comments to your attention?
NinaNesterovaOSM (2025-02-28 14:42:41+00:00): I am soon, but i am not bought our attentions. But the vape shop is stil here.
SomeoneElse (2025-02-28 15:03:58+00:00): You're not really explaining yourself very well.  I've asked at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-bot-like-comments-on-changesets/126587 - perhaps you could post a comment there?
NinaNesterovaOSM (2025-02-28 16:05:57+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-bot-like-comments-on-changesets/126587/2

Yes. I have posted in the Community Forum.
SomeoneElse (2025-02-28 17:13:40+00:00): Thank you. I still don't understand what you're asking here?
I was a shop. It closed. Then it opened again. Then it closed again. Then it opened again. There were at least 3 name changes along the way.
pierre_geovelo (2025-04-25 13:38:34+00:00): Bonjour, sur le boulevard Henri Barbusse, vous avez numérisé une piste cyclable qui remonte la rue jusqu'à l'avenue berlioz, d'après des image, je vois que la piste est en ses unique et vous avez mis un oneway=no, ne faudrait-il pas mettre un oneway=yes ?
Cordialement
Pierre
Luca Giovannangeli (2025-04-30 17:40:38+00:00): Bonjour,
Oui en effet, j'ai oublié lorsque je m'en suis occupé. Il me semble que cela a été corrigé depuis.
Merci !
Luca
mavl (2025-02-27 13:52:45+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, откуда информация о запрете проезда для лошадей?
mavl (2025-03-12 15:33:29+00:00): Этот пакет правок добавляет недостоверную информацию. Он отменён.  
1. Пакет правок добавляет запрет для лошадей. Это неправильно. На местности нет запрета для лошадей (и разрешения тоже нет). Никаких знаков на этот счёт нет. Просто шлагбаум.  
2. Пакет правок добавляет запрет для автомобилей motor_vehicle=no. Это тоже неправильно. Нет запрета для автомобилей. Никаких дорожных знаков про запрет для автомобилей нет. Просто шлагбаум. Нужно ставить запрет motor_vehicle=private.
SafwatHalaby (2025-02-27 13:16:48+00:00): Thank you for the fix! These wrong "heb" tags were auto-added by StreetComplete. I should report a bug there.
SafwatHalaby (2025-03-19 20:57:58+00:00): https://github.com/streetcomplete/countrymetadata/pull/29
NeisBot (2025-02-27 17:01:14+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-13 12:44:42+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163084159
BCNorwich (2025-02-27 16:30:06+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The best practice tags for the feature would be building=apartments. The name would not be the number 1. Your tag landuse=residential would apply to the area of land that the residential building is situated on, which is already drawn and tagged.

I've squared the feature up, looks neater now. I've also amended the tags.

Regards Bernard.
silversurfer83 (2025-02-27 15:10:43+00:00): Hello

would you kindly explain in a few more words than just "add subarea" what you're doing with the Hamburg relations?

cheers
silversurfer83 (2025-03-10 08:11:50+00:00): hello again.

Any news on what exactly what and why you worked on those relations here? (the other Hamburg related edits are included in this question)