piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-14 23:17:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144029622 where the changeset comment is: revert sockenpuppen-edits
i2004 (2023-08-04 09:57:01+00:00): te corregi en la de alvarez jonte
AgusQui (2023-08-04 17:44:14+00:00): Buenísimo. Por favor agrégale los nombres de las paradas, me es más fácil ordenarlas
pesec (2023-08-04 06:42:12+00:00): Добрый день.
Вы установили на улицу ограничение скорости 20км/ч. Чем это обусловлено?
i2004 (2023-08-04 18:15:59+00:00): te hice en el 203 el ramal del viso por general paz
wambacher (2023-08-04 07:12:08+00:00): ts ts ts, 

ist mir auch schon passiert ;)

Gruß
walter
mavl (2023-08-04 15:51:44+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок не добавляет магазин. Он добавляет здания с названием "Пятерочка". Для магазина обязательно нужен тег shop.
arjunaraoc (2023-08-04 12:26:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia)

I have made a minor update of tag via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139439101
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139423956
Frans S (2023-08-04 14:23:52+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You mapped the siding of a high rise building as a building as well.
These buildings, you can recognize them here on their long shadow. have to be mapped on a different way.
On this task, the high-rise buildings are incorrect mapped.
You can see both one or more side walls and the roof. The Imagery is taken under a certain angle, so you can see more than just the roof.
Often all visible walls and roofs are mapped as 1 building.
The correct way is to map the roofline and move the whole object on their footprint.
See this video.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139424088
Tsu-Yi Su (2023-08-05 08:07:20+00:00): Hello Frans,
Thank you very much for the explanation! I will work on improving my mapping skills for this kind of imagery in future tasks.
Best Regard,
Tsu-Yi
Supaplex (2024-05-29 05:23:15+00:00): Revert due to it being a fake bus station

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151971162
mini-me (2023-08-23 17:45:27+00:00): name:ru можно указать дополнительно к name, но не вместо. То же самое с тегом brand
Ferrocarriles de México (2023-08-05 03:56:33+00:00): Solo se usa "highway=trunk" para caminos que son casi una autopista. El criterio exacto lo puedes ver en la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mexico/Red_Nacional_de_Caminos#Troncales_(highway=trunk)
Quixlian (2024-01-11 23:37:09+00:00): No sabía de esos criterios especiales para México, pero te agradezco por enviarme la información. Sin embargo, ya se revirtieron los cambios desde el momento de esta publicación. Perdón si causé algún problema.
eggie (2023-08-04 13:50:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback. Het meest gebruikelijk is dat als er geen groensytrook tussen de hoofdrijbaan zit en het trottoir dat je de tagging opneemt in de hoofdrijbaan met sidewalk= right of left.
Routeren doet het allemaal niet. Probeer maar eens van de trottoir af te komen. Je maakt alleen maar een blokje om. 
Voordat je verder gaat met mappen overweeg om het anders aan te pakken.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk



MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-08-04 14:32:06+00:00): Ik heb wat aangepast conform de wiki...
Je kunt wel trottoirs mappen, maar dan is het ook veel extra werk om oversteken te maken en zijn die er wel overal. Je stapt immers zo van de stoep de rijweg op.
Op de standaardkaart renderen de trottoirs overigens (nog) niet. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-08-04 13:54:33+00:00): Dag Koen... Iets is pas een fietspad als er een bord fietspad staat. Staat er niets dan is het een highway=path. Dus de vraag is welk bord staat hier dan  en waarom eindig dit fietspad als fietspad na 10 m en gaat verder als pad?
Waarom moet je afstappen op een fietspad? bicycle=dismount
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-08-04 13:58:07+00:00): Je edits heb ik even teruggedraaid. Laat even weten of hier echt een bord fietspad is gekomen en welk bord G13?
Dan herstel ik wel mijn revert.

MVG
eggie
LexIgnatov (2023-08-06 19:22:44+00:00): Привет, плохо сделан пакет правок. Пропущены мосты и другие участки дорогю
cs09736 (2023-08-07 04:49:59+00:00): G'day. It seems you deleted the separate way for the protected bike lane. Most other separated bike lanes are mapped as separate ways and the cycleway=track tag is generally only used for speedy mapping. The general consensus is that anything with a physical barrier such as this should be mapped as a separate way. Just wanted to let you know especially since the rest of the area including St Kilda Road have separated bike lanes as separate ways
aceman444 (2025-01-04 20:48:06+00:00): Zdravim, preco pridavate zbytocne body ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11088568698/history a potom to zase dalsich pouzivatelov matie pridavat tam nezmyselne znacky. Chodnik je nad a na garazach, takze treba dat prislusne znacky layer, nie spolocne body, akoby boli v rovnakej urovni.
Marian Mika (2025-01-04 20:56:36+00:00): To už je dávnejšie, čo som editoval niečo v Bratislave. Myslím, že to bol nejaký maproulette projekt. Potom som si už ale dal záväzok, že už Blavu nebudem babrať.
aceman444 (2025-01-04 20:59:57+00:00): No ved prave, zial mnohi pouzivatelia v zapale boja pre Maproulette robia plno chyb.

Taketo veci ale netreba robit ani inde, nie len v Bratislave.
aceman444 (2025-01-04 21:01:35+00:00): A "v zapale boja" by bol ten lepsi pripad. Ako pozeram tych ostatnych, skor nevedia co maju robit Maproulette im to nevysvetli ani po nich neskontroluje. Aky to ma potom zmysel...
Marian Mika (2025-01-04 21:07:41+00:00): vďaka za upozornenie, budem si na to pri ďalšej editácii dávať viac pozor.
Syl (2023-08-05 13:17:28+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé cette modification.
Les informations name et branch que j'avais renseigné correspondent à ce que j'ai constaté sur place.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2023-08-07 06:39:12+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci de votre retour
Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
literan (2023-08-04 22:33:10+00:00): дом не носит такое название, откачу
flohoff (2023-08-04 09:39:15+00:00): Moin,
durch das maxspeed:type=DE:rural hat sich hier eine routingänderung ergeben die nicht so schön ist. Grundsätzlich ist das tagging richtig.

Ich habe jetzt mal lanes=1 nachgetagged um zu verdeutlichen das das enge Straßen auf dem lande sind - dann gehen router davon aus das das nur 1/2 maxspeed geht ...

Hoffe das routing schwenkt zurück.

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=479955,500002

Flo
Patchanka (2023-08-05 09:34:50+00:00): bonjour
vous indiquez dans votre commentaire "Le chemin s'appelle bien chemin de Charvet" et vous avez mis dans OSM "Chemin de Charavet" (avec un A). 
Pouvez-vous me confirmer la bonne orthographe ?
JBacc1 (2023-08-05 10:12:04+00:00): Bonjour,
La contribution semble bonne. Vous avez ajouté le tag access=destination qui correspond bien à l'accès interdit sauf riverains. Vous aurez observé que la modification apparait bien sur la carte.
N'hésitez pas à continuer à contribuer, et si vous avez besoin d'un coup de main, n'hésitez pas à demander, directement ou sur le forum.
Bonne journée,
JB.
(Inactive) hayduke1275 (2023-09-26 22:37:22+00:00): Why did you delete the private access tag? This is a gated community. The private access tag means only those with individual permission can access. See the wiki here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
GrabID_UmiZumroh (2023-09-27 05:19:06+00:00): Hi hayduke1275

The motor_vehicle=private tag already added to the Way ID in this Changeset: 129629881.

For the access tag on the barrier that I removed, I have updated it according to your feedback.

Thank You.
Supaplex (2024-05-29 05:23:16+00:00): Revert due to it being a fake bus station

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151971162
DaveF (2023-08-04 15:41:13+00:00): Hi
Could you clarify your amendments.
BCNorwich (2023-08-04 16:13:11+00:00): Hi, Certainly, there was a one node section of Way: Frome Road (4411939) that was on top of Way: Wellsway (8406026). I joined two nodes to eliminate the duplicate section of highway. 

Regards Bernard.
DaveF (2023-08-04 19:52:39+00:00): What was the ref of the "one node section of Way: Frome Road (4411939)"?

Struggling to see where "duplicate section of highway." were. Please indicate the relevant refs.
BCNorwich (2023-08-05 05:42:55+00:00): Hi, the duplication was actually removed in my previous changeset number 139426529
BCNorwich (2023-08-05 05:43:21+00:00): Node: 11086150764
DaveF (2023-08-05 09:26:42+00:00): So my original question remains unanswered.
BCNorwich (2023-08-05 09:41:33+00:00): Hi, For absolute clarity please just revert the changesets. You'll then be able to see the changes made.
DaveF (2023-08-05 10:15:25+00:00): I can see the amendments you made. I wish to know the reasons you made them.
DaveF (2023-08-06 13:53:00+00:00): As you've not replied, but continued editing I assume you don't have a relevant argument. Please refrain from making unnecessary changes. If you're using a bot/routine to auto check, please amend your code to avoid  repetition.
BCNorwich (2023-08-06 14:15:37+00:00): I did not reply because I did not want to be a party to any argument. I'll just continue to correct any mistakes I see, especially like the highway duplication on that roundabout, that, if left, would likely disrupt routing.

If you wish to see the duplication simply revert the changeset number 139426529
johsin18 (2023-08-05 15:01:58+00:00): Hi Tabouli68,
thanks for adding items around Weil am Rhein.  But please use correct tagging: The name tag should not be set in these cases (neither Poubelle nor Banc), "name" is only for proper names.  In particular, it does not make sense to have a French name in a German-speaking location.  Also, don't add "avec dossier" as description, as this is not machine-readable (and me as a German had to look it up in a dictionary).  Rather set backrest=yes as defined here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dbench
Seems like OsmAnd is not great as an editor.
Thanks for you understanding.  Feel free to come back to me if you have any questions.  
johsin18
Supaplex (2024-05-29 05:23:17+00:00): Revert due to it being a fake bus station

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151971162
AndersAndersson (2023-08-04 13:29:54+00:00): Hej!
Ska det vara en amenity=guest_house tagg också?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house
Atakua (2023-08-06 17:25:40+00:00): Ja, det skulle bli bättre. Jag kommer att bearbeta området lite efter gårdagens ytterligare survey.
AndersAndersson (2023-08-06 19:29:48+00:00): Toppen!
alxGS (2023-08-29 13:24:53+00:00): Hi,
bitte die Dr.-Beuerle-Straße ausgeschrieben als Doktor-Beuerle-Straße lassen.
Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Abk%C3%BCrzungen
alxGS (2023-08-29 13:31:33+00:00): Notiz an mich selbst: Artikel zu Ende lesen bevor man andere Leute im Internet auf seine eigene Dummheit hinweist.
wolfbert (2023-08-29 13:55:24+00:00): Alles geklärt? Ich weiß, da hat es längliche Diskussionen und unterschiedliche Sichten und Lösungsvorschläge gegeben. 
Mein Ansatz ist: name = Name auf dem Straßenschild; wenn abweichend, dann official_name = Name beim BEV; gängige Abkürzungen (Dr., Ing., Prof.) bleiben; im Zweifel könnte man noch short_name, alt_name o.ä verwenden.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-09 11:14:14+00:00): Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11088698576 is not attached to any pipes and takes water directly from moist soil (=groundwater)

or is maybe app presenting it a wrong way?

maybe source of piped water is groundwater, but it is piped to the fire hydrant?
Adze1 (2023-08-04 09:01:45+00:00): Thanks. Thought it was odd that the trig point was 'missing'. Strictly it's a gate next to a stile.
I think it's a problem with apps using out-of-date underlying tiles.
burrscurr (2023-08-12 18:18:16+00:00): vgl. changeset/139798056
secondaryhighway (2023-08-17 03:23:34+00:00): سلام لطفا این ادیت را دوباره چک کنید این راه ها بسته نیستند
Ebi_DeSa (2023-08-17 06:48:53+00:00): سلام دوست عزیز، من ساکن همین محله هستم. این قسمتها رو بستن و شاید تا یکسال ادامه خواهد داشت. چون دارن اینجا و سر جنت آباد، دوربرگردان غیر هسطح میسازن
secondaryhighway (2023-08-18 09:30:06+00:00): سلام مرسی برای جوابتان
secondaryhighway (2023-08-18 09:31:16+00:00): فقط لطفا از تگ
construction
استفاده کنید مثلا construction=trunk
Ebi_DeSa (2023-08-19 17:01:16+00:00): چشم حتما
aTarom (2023-08-04 18:54:01+00:00): Hola tomasvidal, gracias por editar y bienvenido.
Una duda con el tag
"fuel:gasolina_comum"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11088700449/history
es la primera vez que veo la etiqueta y veo que solo se utiliza por Brasil, sabes si se trata de gasolina no aditivada o algo de uso agrícola?
en la web de la empresa solo encuentro
--- Carrión de Calatrava
------ Gasóleo A y B
https://www.grupomontesnorte.com/secciones/energeticos/
Si quieres participar en los canales de la comunidad sobre este tema o lo que se necesite puedes pasarte por
https://t.me/OSMes
ó
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51
Saludos y gracias por participar
tomasvidal (2023-08-07 05:57:39+00:00): ok, gracias por la aportación, es gasolina 95 , muchas gracias
Carto'Cité (2023-12-13 11:43:30+00:00): Salut Alix,
Tu as supprimé les tags sur cet aménagement :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/119683931
Je pense que c'est une erreur et je vais corriger mais si tu as une autre info dis moi :)
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
alix_geovelo (2023-12-13 12:48:41+00:00): Hello !

Oups, en effet c'est une grossière erreur.
Alors, vu la note rattachée, je pense que j'ai voulu supprimer le bicycle designated, mais j'ai en fait supprimé le highwy=

 Mais je n'ai plus tout en tête donc j'ai tout remis comme précédemment.

Merci pour ton suivi !
Carto'Cité (2023-12-13 12:52:11+00:00): Oups comme j'étais dessus j'ai un conflit 😅
Merci pour ton retour !
Toute la zone est compliqué, j'ai ajouté des notes.
nevw (2023-08-04 21:37:17+00:00): Hi, there is a problem with you boundary relation.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.02430&lat=-27.40540&zoom=15
Schools normally have simpler mapping with an amenity=school tag on the boundary only serving as the container for all within. If you must use a relation, i.e. where campuses are in more than one property, a multipolygon type is probably more suitable.
osmviborg (2023-08-04 08:56:51+00:00): description
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:00:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
Dodko (2023-08-04 18:59:52+00:00): Vymazali ste značku že je to budova, opravte to.
antonr (2023-11-19 21:00:31+00:00): Hej Andershl,

Så vidt jeg kan se har du modificeret  denne kløversti over flere omgange: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14453808.

Jeg undrer mig over følgende:

Hvordan er du kommet frem til at det elektriske hegn (way/1194211901) skal være en del af vandreruten?

Jeg tvivler også på at way/1194211899 er en del af vandreruten. Den ligger så vidt jeg husker inde i en indhegning med dyr...

Stien https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1194211898, som du har tilføjet rute, ser ærligt talt fuldstændig urealistisk ud: Den går tværs gennem buske og elektriske hegn og svarer ikke til noget der ligner en sti på SDFI-foto... (til gengæld løber way/447923358 ca. parallelt, svarer til fotos, og er på den side af hegn hvor der ikke er dyr...)

Det var måske bedre bare at lade ruten være ukomplet end at tilføje tvivlsomme data? Især hvis du ikke har været på stedet...

Mvh antonr
andershl (2023-11-20 08:40:56+00:00): Pas. Du vil bemærke, at sidste rettelse er fra en anden, og jeg kan umiddelbart se, at nogen har rettet i den og klippet den i stykker siden den dag, jeg oprettede den svarende til https://www.visitnordvestkysten.dk/nordvestkysten/planlaeg-din-tur/kloeverstier-i-loenstrup-gdk1102781
antonr (2023-11-20 23:38:02+00:00): God pointe! Jeg har tilsyneladende fejllæst historikken, du skal selvfølgelig ikke forklare hvad andre har lavet :-)
Mazda05 (2023-08-05 05:16:59+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war
ivanbranco (2023-08-13 19:30:58+00:00): area=yes è sottinteso da place=square (non esistono place=square disegnati con una way chiusa che non siano aree).
Mazda05 (2023-08-05 05:17:53+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war
Mazda05 (2023-08-05 05:18:34+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war
Mazda05 (2023-08-05 05:19:39+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war
Mazda05 (2023-08-05 05:20:39+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war
grzegorzmilosz (2023-08-04 09:54:46+00:00): Zmiana typu drogi z Droga w budowie na drogę trzeciorzędną ( oczywiście zasady wjazdu / wstępu na NO dla wszystkich ), po za krótkim do drogi oznaczonej na mapie jako linia: 173696149 gdzie pod znakiem zakazu wjazdu jest tabliczka zezwalająca na wjazd dla mieszkańców. Reszta jest ustawiona jako zasada wjazdu / wstępu na NO dla wszystkich, Tyczy się to fragmentów dróg na których został położony już asfalt lub kostka brukowa. Do czasu oddania do użytku będzie widniały podobnie jak autostrady czy drogi ekspresowe które zostały wybudowane a nie oddane do użytku. gdzie access jest ustawiony na NO.
taxi55 (2023-08-28 19:36:06+00:00): Dear Sofa-Mapper,
please check it out, before tagging....
best regards
Kovoschiz (2023-08-04 11:07:16+00:00): Please don't add non-brand-unique information that is already covered by `brand:*=`
Kovoschiz (2023-08-04 11:14:43+00:00): 2. Please don't add generic advertisements  in `description=` . That's for branch-specific info only.
Kovoschiz (2023-08-04 11:08:14+00:00): Please use `addr:full:en=` and `addr:full:zh=`
ID`s (2023-08-04 10:31:06+00:00): Піццерія хіба закрилась?
NorthCrab (2023-08-04 11:54:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1194699166
Uważaj aby nie oznaczać budynku w budynkach.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6424849485
Kiedy zmieniasz POI, zmień wszystkie jego atrybuty, nie tylko samą nazwę.
NorthCrab (2023-08-04 11:55:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7619157185
Obok był już INDU, teraz są 2 duplikaty.
eggie (2023-08-04 14:07:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Normaal gesproken zijn er altijd al adresnodes. Hier ook .. Daarop zit Gezondheidscentrum Galgenwaard.
Altijd lastig als er meer instellingen zitten op één adres. 
De format 2de etage klopt niet.
Alles gaat in UK English volgens vaste formats. 
Je kunt wel Nederlands gebruiken als je description ipv unit invoert. 
2de etage is geen unit. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses

Dan format phone begint altijd in osm Nederland met +31 ........


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
mueschel (2023-08-12 11:27:19+00:00): Hi,
please check this building, it got a strange 'waln' tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1194700070
Ptigrouick (2023-08-12 21:45:34+00:00): Thanks it was a mistake I just make the correction with wall=no
mapperue (2023-08-06 08:41:26+00:00): Ak je objekt značený na budove, tak sa k nemu nepridáva adresa.
gurglypipe (2023-08-04 18:11:11+00:00): Hiya. Are you sure that the licensing terms for the DoBIH data are compatible with those of OpenStreetMap?

DoBIH data is licensed CC-BY-4.0 (see http://www.hills-database.co.uk/downloads.html#copyright). According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility, this license is incompatible for import into OSM unless a waiver is provided which waives attribution and allows redistribution.

Do you know if such a waiver exists? Is this import of hill locations something which has gone through the import guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines)? I couldn’t find any documentation about this import of DoBIH data on the wiki.

Sorry to question you on this, but ensuring license compatibility is important in order to ensure that OSM data can continue to be used under *its* license terms by everyone. It’s boring legal stuff, but it is important to get right on scales like this in order to allow the project to continue. Ta
Douglal (2023-08-04 19:14:16+00:00): Hello
Thanks for checking.
It's fine though as I haven't imported any data. I have just used the Database of British and Irish Hills as a reliable published public source of information.
I also cross checked their location with the OS map position.
Cheers
gurglypipe (2023-08-05 07:12:48+00:00): You've made over 100 edits which copy the data from DoBIH into OSM. Their copyright page states that use of the DoBIH data needs to clearly give attribution to DoBIH where the data is used. OpenStreetMap cannot do that — all it has is “© OpenStreetMap contributors” as a link in the bottom. It would need something like “© OpenStreetMap contributors and The Database of British and Irish Hills v18” to comply with their attribution requirements.

Accordingly, as I understand things, DoBIH data therefore cannot be used in OSM without a waiver which says they’re happy to waive the attribution requirement.

Given how popular and useful OSM is, I imagine the DoBIH people might be amenable to providing a waiver. Have you spoken to them about it?

If you think my interpretation of the licensing is incorrect, you could raise the question on the imports mailing list (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports).

Ta :)
Douglal (2023-08-05 07:22:58+00:00): Hi again.
As I wrote in my reply, I haven't imported any data from DoBIH. All that I have done is visually referenced published sources including OS maps. This has dramatically improved the locations of Lake District summits on OSM. No original material has been copied from DoBIH and so copyright and licensing are not an issue. I have just used my own observation.
I hope that clarifies matters and addresses your concern.
Cheers
gurglypipe (2023-08-05 07:31:31+00:00): Can you clarify a few things so I can make sure I’m understanding things properly? :)

1) Which OS maps are you using?
2) How are you referencing the DoBIH data? Are you overlaying OSM onto it and moving the summits so they align with something? Are you looking at the latitude/longitude directly? I’m not really clear how your process works.

Thanks
Douglal (2023-08-05 07:47:24+00:00): If you click on a peak's grid ref on DoBIH then it displays the summit's position on a map. You can select OS map, aerial, etc. I look at these and visually align the peak on OSM using the standard map with the aerial background. This allow me to fairly accurately locate the peak without copying anything. All just my observation and judgement. It took me several hours to make these improvements to the locations of popular Wainwright summits on OSM for the public's benefit. There are clearly no copyright or licensing issues with this manual process.
I am glad that I have now clarified this fully for you so that you have no need to ask any further questions. I understand that you raised a legitimate concern and that I have been able to address it.
Thanks