piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Pathumthani (2025-08-25 12:19:40+00:00): Ich hatte Dir den ganzen Vorfall schon vor 2 oder 3 Wochen mit Quelle an Deine Mailadresse gemeldet und warte bis heute auf eine Antwort!
Hier also also die Message von GerdP an mein Postfach:
19. September 2024 um 07:03 Uhr
"Ich tue einfach mal so, als ob mich Dein Geschrei in Form von Ausrufezeichen nicht stört....."
In dem Changeset osm.org/changeset/170970333 habe ich doch alle Vorgaben der Community längst umgesetzt! Was willst Du mehr!?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-10 16:55:23+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12989953808/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Gregory Peony (2025-07-16 15:57:53+00:00): Hi begrian, you correctly identified buildings in the imagery. Most though not all footprints here have been appropriately squared. The footprints you mapped are generally oversized and some (flagged) likely envelope multiple buildings; use roof colour and shadows to determine building size, shape and where one building ends and another begins. Use shift+(-/+) to scale selected features after tagging and shaping them. --- Landuse and footpritns should not share common nodes. I recommend watching the new mapper common mistakes videos here https://www.youtube.com/@TheMissingMaps/videos ---Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168703315
fndoder (2025-07-09 19:00:10+00:00): Удалил тег name, так как у этого дома нет имени собственного, только адрес.

addr:city внутри города сейчас заполнять нет необходимости, город и так понятен картографическому ПО из геометрии полигона города (расположению дома внутри него).
Toni100 (2025-07-29 12:37:33+00:00): Moi! Kiitos bussireittien tägipäivityksistä. Huomasin että hyvin monesta reitistä on poistettu nimitägit (fi, sv, en) eikä sitä ole perusteltu. Tällaista käytäntöä ei myöskään ole muissa Suomen kaupungeissa. Reitin nimen voi ottaa esimerkiksi Fölin GTFS datasetistä, jota on lupa käyttää. Käsittääkseni nimitägien poistolle ei ole mitään syytä, voidaan toki keskustella siitä. Kiitos jo etukäteen!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168703455
bresomch (2025-07-14 18:59:39+00:00): Weil Migros Do it ist nicht mehr da ist, wurde das Ladenlokal durch mich in ein leerstehendes Lokal geändert
"disused:shop: doityourself"
 mit dem alten Namen hinterlegt:
old_name: Do it + Garden Migros

Bitte nicht einfach so löschen.
Nach dem gegenwärtigen Umbau wird eine Landi-Filiale eröffnet.
Und das leerstehende Lokal lässt sich problemlos mit den neuen Daten "füttern".
paoso (2025-07-09 16:08:22+00:00): gut gemacht
pms63 (2025-07-09 18:29:29+00:00): Ich hatte einen guten Lehrer!
vmicho (2025-08-02 11:46:32+00:00): OMG man, it was already correct, with splits AFTER the crossroad. Now the splits are part of the turns and all navigations are broken.

I'd highly suggest to 1) recreate the proper turn angle or 2) revert this change
vmicho (2025-08-02 11:48:23+00:00): The problem is currently discussed here:

https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/22964

Looking at the history, this crossroad was already correctly (from the logical / navigational perspective) mapped 2 times and 2 times broken again.
Elizen (2025-07-16 05:33:30+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Не нужно у населённых пунктов в name/name:ru указывать статусную часть. Иногда она действительно необходима, но в случае Большаково - нет.
b-jazz (2025-07-10 17:21:10+00:00): Same issue here. The rough and bunker ways shouldn't intersect each other. The rough needs to go around the bunker.
TheNewCivilian (2025-07-10 07:01:58+00:00): Hi @Mueschel. Thank you for the quick quality check. I added those keys as a test in regards to: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/railway-station-id-confusion-uic-ref/132393 . I am trying to find out whats the best way to deal with the issue of uic_ref not being clearly defined. For now I check every uic_ref change and advice to use ref:ibnr instead if it it actually is an ibnr value. I believe there would be a value in migrating to ref:uic, as that would go in accordance with namespacing principles and allow to monitor the migration more easily, but it seams that getting rid of a legacy key is generally considered to be a bad practice. What do you think about this issue?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168704522
mueschel (2025-07-10 16:55:40+00:00): Changing a tag that has been in use for more than a decade and is used 130k times is very difficult - you need to update all the tools that use the tag, update the memory of all the mappers that remember the old tag, change all the editors... In general it's not worth all the effort.
jpennycook (2025-07-21 10:34:38+00:00): Hi!

Are "Wokingham Useful Cycle Routes" and "Crowthorne Useful Cycle Routes" official signposted routes?  I see they include some dirt tracks which wouldn't be suitable for ordinary (road) bikes.

LCNs should only be added for officially signposted routes.

Jon
Kpechtunx (2025-07-22 17:18:41+00:00): Hi Jon,
I was originally attempting to indicate lanes, paths and quiet roads (eg. modal filtered) which can safely be used for utility cycling and represent local permeability.  This includes some moderately loose surface paths which I often find more comfortable to use than tree-root and pothole riddled cycle paths (on 28mm tyres), but definitely not mountain-bike-only style trails.  Network class = lcn seemed to be the closest fit for this requirement, based on usage elsewhere, but I'm happy to update this if there is a better way of representing a tried-and-tested community network.
The ultimate aim is to improve accuracy of route planning using cyclestreets.net, btw.
- K.
jpennycook (2025-07-22 19:05:44+00:00): Thanks for getting back to me.

That's not what the lcn relation is for, since you're using it for a subjective purpose rather than using official signposted routes, and you're effectively tagging for the router/renderer https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer 

You should instead add/check the surface, lit, smoothness, width, and cycleway tags on each way instead which are objective, and which should be consumed by journey planners like CycleStreets or cycle.travel (I gave up with CycleStreets years ago).  The StreetComplete app makes this simple.

Jon
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-10 10:06:25+00:00): Hi!

Can you explain why you reduced precision on the motorway? These segments were aligned precisely using geodesic data. Please do not touch motorways in the Montreal area before asking. Thanks!
MerlinPendragon (2025-07-09 17:53:10+00:00): Duplicates the existing Rogers Stadium area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1377018861
TheNightRider (2025-07-24 21:48:56+00:00): Hi! Appreciate your mapping because we need all the help we can get, but I have a request. Would you add more specific changeset comments than "add parking and update alignments"? Many times it has nothing to do with parking, so a generic changeset comment is not useful. Might as well leave no comment than a confusing one.

JOSM can show exactly what your changes were, but it would save everyone's time if they didn't have to fire up JOSM. Here's how to help us: do more frequent saves, like when you edit one object or a few nearby objects, and give specific comments for those edits. iD and JOSM will save your comments so you can reuse them from a drop-down menu (and edit as needed). That's pretty cool.
Thanks!
Leo Slager (2025-07-10 10:40:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2025-07-10 10:45:58+00:00): Hi,

Dat is vast niet de naam van het gebouw. Ik heb de naam en overige info toegevoegd aan de address-node.
4004 (2025-07-13 23:54:59+00:00): а в итоге подьезд с Химиков будет? а то на свежем есри не видно его, только от 9Б
aakkkaa (2025-07-14 00:07:10+00:00): подъезды в доме 6А только во двор, со стороны Химиков вроде бы коммерческие помещения должны быть, поэтому я не удалял эти входы, но информацию по ним нужно уточнить.
aakkkaa (2025-07-14 00:12:23+00:00): ошибся. подъезд с Химиков появился, со стороны дома 9Б его вроде бы нет, там новая стоянка
4004 (2025-07-14 00:49:26+00:00): хм, ладно, удалю кусок от 9б. странно они его повели, однако, хотя по полю проще
grzegorz75jan (2025-08-02 09:58:47+00:00): Usunę te lody w Mościcach koło zajezdni. Niby sam widziałem gdy były ale więcej ich nie ma niż są https://postimg.cc/ZB4HXBJr
redd (2025-07-09 17:37:12+00:00): Die Beschränkungen habe ich desem Artikel der Stadt entnommen https://www.stuttgart.de/service/aktuelle-meldungen/2025/juni/radverkehr-profitiert-von-neuer-fahrradstrasse-am-bahnhofsplatz-in-bad-cannstatt.php (zweites Foto)
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-11 23:32:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245272553
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245272588

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2025-07-09 17:46:43+00:00): Hi gasibey, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Renamed and reorganized street names, removing redundant and outdated tags, and adjusted related way and relation geometries."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
SomeoneElse (2025-07-09 17:53:20+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 168631271, 168631326, 168631334, 168631918, 168648673, 168675005, 168676597, 168676615, 168680892, 168680909, 168680937, 168693810, 168693861, 168693935.
SomeoneElse (2025-07-09 17:53:21+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 168631271, 168631326, 168631334, 168631918, 168648673, 168675005, 168676597, 168676615, 168680892, 168680909, 168680937, 168693810, 168693861, 168693935.
enzo_immergis (2025-07-23 15:14:47+00:00): Hello user_5359,
It appears that it is indeed kick-scooter_parking and not kick_scooter_parking.
Perhaps this should be changed?
The wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=kick-scooter_parking
Kind regards
hauke-stieler (2026-04-01 18:01:46+00:00): Moin,

danke fürs ergänzen der neuen Spielgeräte hier. Allerdings haben Spielgeräte in den seltensten Fällen einen Namen, was - soweit ich mich erinnere - hier auch der Fall ist, daher habe ich die name-tags mal entfernt. Dass es ein Trampolin ist, sieht man ja durch playground=trampoline.

Grüße
Hauke
SomeoneElse (2025-07-09 19:27:13+00:00): This failed with "cannot upload changeset: 520 <none> at /home/ajtown/src/osm-revert-scripts/lib/Progress.pm line 104.", which isn't great.

The changeset comment was supposed to be "Revert undiscussed guessed-geometry import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18370"

Some iffy data remains, see e.g. https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/27wN . Also I've no idea where https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124097210 came from.
user_5359 (2025-07-09 18:01:32+00:00): wrong comment: correct contact information
mueschel (2025-07-12 15:54:02+00:00): Hallo,
bitte schaue nochmal über deine Tags. Bei vielen taucht "source" irgendwo in der Mitte auf. Allerdings ist "source" ein Präfix, gehört also an den Anfang, z.B.  source:cycleway:left:width.
tordans (2025-07-14 13:17:51+00:00): Hallo mueschel, danke für den Hinweis. Wir stellen unser Mapping um auf source:cycleway:left:width. Die bestehenden Tags massen-updaten wir in den nächsten Tagen.

PS: Die Mapping-Arbeit ist Teil von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Berlin_Radinfrastruktur_(Vorrangnetz)

VG
keyyushi (2025-07-09 23:26:18+00:00): Selamlar,

Bazı elementleri silip tekrar haritalandırmışsınız. Bunu neden yaptınız?
Frans S (2025-07-12 12:38:14+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping. 
Stay within the rooflines to map accurate.

C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building

E: Buildings not squared, 5 out of 45.

G: Included the shadow of the buildings. (buildings are rather high, they show a big black spot on the north side. This is the shadow. Not a part of the building,


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
gscholz (2025-07-17 05:43:06+00:00): Hi  Guillaume,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-1.63602&lat=46.67382&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges
As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about how to edit hiking routes properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking#Tagging_walking_and_hiking_Route_Networks

Kind regards
Guido
Elizen (2025-07-16 05:18:31+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Вы уточняете границы населённых пунктов, при этом удаляя существующую границу (Гусев - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1356883, ) и рисуя новую (Гусев - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19338643). Можно же было переиспользовать линии из отношения (relation/1356883) и история объекта сохранилась бы.

Такая же ситуация с домами в этой правке. Приведу несколько примеров: удалили здания (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152004586, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152004540, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238345896), чтобы нарисовать аналогичные (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413549151, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413549150, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413549145) с помощью плагина. Если здание уже стоит, добавьте для него информацию, а не сносите и рисуйте с нуля.
KekcuHa (2025-07-16 08:11:13+00:00): О, спасибо за неявную подсказку! Я не знал об инструменте «Заменить геометрию». При возможности буду использовать его, вместо удаления и переноса из ЕГРН.
DD1GJ (2025-07-09 18:55:45+00:00): Revert.

Hallo 007vk, willkommen bei OSM. Ich habe Deine Änderung rückgängig gemaxht, weil Du einen wichtigen Schlüssel von der Mannheimer Stadtgrenze gelöscht hattest. Was wolltest Du hinzufügen?

Viele Grüße, Joachim
citrula (2025-07-10 03:40:46+00:00): the barrier=kerb nodes should not go on the main sidewalk way, but rather on a "stub" connecting the main sidewalk to the crossing. From the barrier=kerb wiki page: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dkerb#On_a_node
> Please do not add a barrier=kerb on a node joining the footways near the crossing (e.g. sidewalk footway joining with footway crossing the road). That would implicate that such kerbs block not only crossing the road, but also just using the sidewalk (i.e. without intending to cross the road), which is almost never the case - and which has a big implication for several classes of users (most notably, wheelchair users).
Balaji0404 (2025-07-10 12:00:11+00:00): Sorry for the unfortunate mistake and I will make sure this kind of mistakes wont happen further. Thank you for your kind feedback.
silversurfer83 (2025-07-10 15:31:10+00:00): Hi :)

danke, dass du hier aufpasst und Adressen aktuell hälst.

Eine Bitte: Adressen sollten idR *entweder* nur am Gebäude *oder* als einzelner Punkt im Gebäude erfasst werden. Bei der 3A hast du die Adresse doppelt erfasst.

Bei Gebäuden, die nur eine HsNr haben, bin ich Freund davon die Adresse auf das Gebäude zu legen. Wenn in einem Ort jedoch alle Adressen als einzelne Punkte erfasst sind, sollte das auch möglichst einheitlich im ganzen Ort so sein.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168711203
keyyushi (2025-07-09 23:45:21+00:00): Merhaba, 

377496329 ID'li yolun adı "Seafront Apartment Ardeşen" mi yoksa tatil yerini haritalandırırken yanlışlıkla onu da mı isimlendirdiniz? Ayrıca tatil yerini yanlışlıkla Ardeşen (1725592) ve Konaktepe (17217753) relationlarına da eklemişsiniz.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377496329
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1725592
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17217753
NeisBot (2025-07-09 19:27:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 05:15:29+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/169089363
Glassman (2025-07-10 15:46:49+00:00): This appears to be a residential house. By adding a business you are inviting people to stop by, anytime day and night, to the house. If it is open for business, you should add a tag to describe the type of business it is such as office=estate_agent.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168711739
Glassman (2025-07-10 15:48:32+00:00): Plus you could also add at website tag, website= and phone, phone=+1-123=456-7890
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168711739
rancidgoat (2025-07-09 19:35:22+00:00): Deleted West end of High Street. I mistakenly wrote east in my original edit.
tordans (2025-07-10 06:07:24+00:00): Für https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413560053
Dieser Weg wird in TILDA nicht als Getrennter Geh- Radweg erkannt werden. Dafür muss ergänzt werden:
- traffic_mode:right=foo
- is_sidepath=yes

Bitte auch ergänzen: surface:color, width, width:source (jew. nur die Radspur und und ohne Markierung, Kantsteine), am besten ein mapillary, traffic_sign.
Die Straße hat nur an einer stelle ein "separate" bekommen (habe ich nicht weiter geprüft).

Bitte "shared_lane" nur verwenden, wenn (nur) Sharrows vorhanden sind, also Mischverkehr mit Pictogrammen auf dem Boden. Sonst ist es cw=no
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Sharrows_Toronto_2011.jpg
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168711853
tordans (2025-07-10 06:07:31+00:00): Für https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413560053
Dieser Weg wird in TILDA nicht als Getrennter Geh- Radweg erkannt werden. Dafür muss ergänzt werden:
- traffic_mode:right=foo
- is_sidepath=yes

Bitte auch ergänzen: surface:color, width, width:source (jew. nur die Radspur und und ohne Markierung, Kantsteine), am besten ein mapillary, traffic_sign.
Die Straße hat nur an einer stelle ein "separate" bekommen (habe ich nicht weiter geprüft).

Bitte "shared_lane" nur verwenden, wenn (nur) Sharrows vorhanden sind, also Mischverkehr mit Pictogrammen auf dem Boden. Sonst ist es cw=no
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Sharrows_Toronto_2011.jpg
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168711853
FMC-Henri (2025-07-22 12:56:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/962936965 hat `cycleway:both=no` und `cycleway:left=shared_lane`. Ich würde hier statt `both`, `right` erwarten.
tordans (2025-07-24 10:25:24+00:00): Ich habe das in https://osmcha.org/changesets/169389937 korrigiert.
Bitte nochmal kontrollieren, ob ich was übersehen habe.

Falls es Fragen zum shared_lane Thema gibt, bitte nochmal melden.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168711853
b-jazz (2025-07-10 17:17:38+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/638645840

The lines that define fairways, greens, bunkers, water hazards, and tees should never intersect (partially overlap) each other and we noticed that they are overlapping in one or more of the feature pairs in this changeset. If there is no obvious fringe around the green, the fairway should butt up against the green and every node between them should be *shared*. If there is a fringe around the green that is similar to the fairway, the fairway should extend around the green and the two objects should be merged together into a multipolygon (See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon for how to create them with your map editor).  Please read the wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions, please reply here and I'll gladly help clarify things. Thanks!
2019XCR (2025-07-11 13:58:46+00:00): I updated them to not overlap, but butt up to each other with some detail. Most of the holes on this course were very roughly drawn in and it makes it look like there is rough inbetween the fairways and holes which there is not. The fairway comes right up to the green and there is fringe around the greens but I am not taking the time to put that in. The detail on this course was not very accurate.
b-jazz (2025-07-11 15:38:34+00:00): Thanks for getting back to me 2019. 

I agree there is no rough between the fairway and green on the 16th hole and the two should butt up against each other. You said you updated them to not overlap, but the one hole I referenced at the top of my comment is still wrong? Did you miss this one? You have the fairway overlapping the green instead of sharing the boundary nodes: https://ibb.co/SwJ4fpMz

What it needs to look like is this: https://ibb.co/GQSBd3Kx

I hope that makes sense. If not, please let me know. Thanks.
2019XCR (2025-07-11 17:00:54+00:00): I didn't see you referenced the 16th hole. Thanks for fixing that. I did most of 1-9 and fixed those. I plan on going through the rest of the back 9 this weekend.  I worked on Deerfield Golf Club (Brockport NY)  a few years back and I honestly forgot all the details of doing a course. I don't plan on fixing to much with this as the original was not very accurate and the points are to far apart.  It would take a lot of effort.
NieWnen (2025-07-09 20:23:22+00:00): Ścieżka błędnie połączona z granicą administracyjną.

Tu nie ma oficjalnie żadnego mostku/kładki – to zwykły jaz, w dodatku nigdzie nie prowadzi. 
Błędne/również nadmiarowe tagowanie.
Zmianę niestety wycofałem.
ManuelB701 (2025-07-10 05:34:38+00:00): Weißt du noch, wie viele Stellplätze es sich um Behindertenparkplätze sich handeln? Ich habe die Aufteilung größtenteils rückgängig gemacht, da die Einzeichnung der Parkbuchten einfacher und praktischer ist als es in dem Fall nur über "parking:*" zu machen.