piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MarinoBM (2026-02-07 13:27:25+00:00): Como descripción me parece aceptable. En cuanto a valor ¿Dónde está documentada la etiqueta shop=bazar_chino, cuando shop=variety_store es un tipo de tienda generalizada que no es exclusiva de España?
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/duda-sobre-el-etiquetado-de-tiendas-de-loteria-estancos-farmacias-y-chinos-paquis/131596/4
En caso de dudas, puedes plantearlas en el grupo de Telegram de OSM España
https://t.me/OSMes

Un saludo.
OSM-Mojacar (2026-02-07 22:10:46+00:00): Como los bazares chinos son un tipo muy concreto de tienda que se repite y todos suelen tener los mismos productos, marcas y precios elevados esperaba encontrar una etiqueta especifica y como he visto que no la hay crear una etiqueta nueva. No se que otro procedimiento hay que seguir a parte de usar la etiqueta, pero me parece siempre mejor usar o crear una etiqueta propia especifica que una que solo se asemeje un poco. Para mi una "Variety Store" es otra cosa que tiene los precios bajos como puede ser "Flying Tiger" o "Primark", justo lo que no cumple ni un solo "chino" que tiene precios siempre muy inflados. Tampoco se parece en nada a un "todo a 100" o un "todo a un 1€" porque los artículos tienen precios distintos. No es mejor documentar y hacer oficial el eso de la etiqueta "bazar_chino" o una etiqueta similar, puesto es es lo suficientemente popular y de uso común en España y merecería tener su identidad propia? No estoy en Telegram, si lo puedes plantear ahí estaría bien
Hugoren Martinako (2026-02-09 10:09:44+00:00): Un Primark es un shop=clothes, y un Flying Tiger es un shop=variety_store. Un bazar tiene la misma categoría que el Tiger, variety_store. No hay necesidad de crear una categoría especial, puesto que se venden las mismas tonterías baratas.
El "todo a 100" es un concepto español para un variety_store. No todo valía 100 pesetas, si no una manera de decir, vendo cosas baratuchas.
OSM-Mojacar (2026-02-10 23:46:12+00:00): Primark vende más cosas aparte de ropa y zapatos, también vende maletas, artículos para el hogar, baño, papelería, decoración y complementos. Los bazares chinos que conozco yo no tienen los mismos artículos ni precios que un Flying Tiger ni venden tonterías baratas. En la sección de ferretería puedes encontrar las mismas herramientas que en cualquier ferretería pero a precios superiores y de materiales de inferior calidad, por ejemplo las herramientas como la palas, espátulas, etc no son de acero inoxidable aunque cobran precios superiores a las marcas más conocidas con mejores calidades. También venden desde vajilla hasta ropa pasando por papelería, jardinería, artículos de viaje, de cocina y de limpieza, automóvil, pequeños muebles, artículos de piscina y playa, juguetes, etc. Ninguno de sus artículos son "tonterías baratas", al contrario, son muy caros comparados con otros comercios y de calidad muchas veces inferior. Justo lo contrario que Flying Tiger que si que son artículos baratos pero no tiene esa variedad.
Hugoren Martinako (2026-02-11 06:30:38+00:00): Sabemos perfectamente que en un Primark se venden más cosas y no por eso deja de ser un shop=clothes. Las tiendas se han de catalogar por su función principal y más destacada, no por el abanico de productos que tengan.
De igual manera ocurre con los bazares, ya están catalogados en el wiki como shop=variety_store, y corresponden exactamente a lo que has descrito aquí en tu primer comentario. Que los que conozcas sean caros no los convierte en una categoría diferente.
OSM-Mojacar (2026-02-11 17:36:39+00:00): Si los que conoces tu encajan en esa descripción eres libre de etiquetarlos como consideres. Los bazares chinos en los que he estado yo y que conozco perfectamente desde hace muchos años no coinciden ni en descripción ni se asemejan a los ejemplos de las variety_store y no considero correcta esa etiqueta, más bien lo contrario. No tiene sentido seguir dándole vueltas, he estado en esas tiendas y se perfectamente que no son variety_stores
empty_child (2024-01-09 09:25:25+00:00): Hello Winevibes,
OSM GE community doesn't have active members in Kutaisi, sorry, you're on your own
eggie (2024-01-08 12:35:25+00:00): Dag GU  Op de luchtfoto zie ik een trekpontje.. Wellicht speelobject. Je heb dat nu verwijderd?
Bestaat dat niet meer?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-08 12:40:51+00:00): ferry:cable =yes 	
A cable ferry (chain ferry, or reaction ferry) is a ferry that is guided or propelled by cables connected to both shores. 

Dat kabel pontje voor de jeugd is er toch nog steeds?
eggie (2024-01-08 12:44:00+00:00): Voorlopig even teruggedraaid middels Wijzigingenset #146027520
jaap de vries (2024-01-09 07:56:45+00:00): Bestaat nog steeds, maar denk dat hij een veerpont bedoeld zoals die naar Texel oid.
eggie (2024-01-09 07:59:37+00:00): Inderdaad Jaap.. Je hebt veerponten en veerponten. 😀
flohoff (2024-01-10 09:10:30+00:00): Moin,
ich dachte ich hätte dir zu diesem Weg geschrieben - finde das aber nicht wieder.

IMHO kann das hier kein Track sein. Da steht ein Wohngebäude. Demnach ist das ja nicht ausschliesslich oder überwiegende Landwirtschaftliche Nutzung.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37747993
Fizzie-DWG (2024-08-09 05:32:38+00:00): Reverted by DWG for apparent fictitious mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155005433
gscscnd (2024-01-08 15:09:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527023431
FWIW, building=industrial i man_made=mineshaft można łączyć.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-06 10:49:31+00:00): name=Bazar Angel
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11500022741

shop=bazar_chino ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
NeisBot (2024-01-09 00:19:04+00:00): Hi DMAGM 👋

your recent changeset has been marked due to a temporary or permanent block from further map edits. 

If you have any questions or if there's anything you'd like to discuss regarding the mapping, feel free to reach out! We're here to help. 

Best regards, 🤖

Details https://osm.org/user_blocks/15560
#ContributorHasBeenBlocked
literan (2024-01-09 19:56:46+00:00): Если Бойня - действующая станция, то почему к ней ведут spur? Если недействующая, то точку станции надо убрать
AlexLabrada (2024-01-14 02:06:23+00:00): There is a report at the rmtm forum in VK about this dying branch, if you watch the new satélite image in Google earth you can see that note that the traffic there should be very scarce if any, in fact it was myself a couple years ago that removed the spur tag from this brach following your logic
eggie (2024-01-08 13:05:27+00:00): Beste G U   Maar het adres bestaat toch nog wel... In het vervolg graag de adresnode intact houden en alleen de bedrijfsinfo verwijderen.
MVG
eggie
00-sq (2024-01-08 13:01:52+00:00): The title automatically auto completed generating the current title (it was supposed to be edit names)
eggie (2024-01-08 13:09:46+00:00): Adres wederom hersteld.
mvg
eggie
eggie (2024-01-08 13:11:55+00:00): Dag Piepske.. Bij mij n weten is hier geen straat met de naam Rapala en ook geen bedrijf .
Ik zal je toevoeging verwijderen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-08 13:12:45+00:00): reverted by changeset #146028563
Nakaner (2024-01-18 13:41:57+00:00): Thank you for reverting. I just found this changeset because I review MAPS.ME contributions in Germany and Austria using Osmcha (and revert about half of them).
eggie (2024-01-18 20:50:53+00:00): 👍
NeisBot (2024-01-13 12:42:47+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105711740
canfe (2024-01-08 17:38:58+00:00): Ho messo io il building passage.
Se metti layer +1 vuol dire che la strada passa sopra le case.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146029090
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-08 13:40:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10826276031
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1238057366

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rocainunwired (2024-01-08 13:49:14+00:00): Reverted changesets 146020841, 145942292, 145942063, 145941968, 145941754, 145941199, 145915877, 145914682, 145914373, 145914170, 145913759, 145912792, 145912131, 145911689, 145911399, 145910849, 145910263, 145904663, 145873390, 145872852, 145870312, 145868581 as they seem to have many conflicts and validation errors
rayth (2024-01-09 10:40:35+00:00): May I know what conflicts or validation errors occured from changeset 146020841. The changeset is just me adding Jawi script ("name:ms-Arab"=*) tag to the states relations
rene78 (2024-01-12 00:57:21+00:00): My impression is that those reverts were a bit hasty. rocainunwired, can you give some examples of bad changes?
rene78 (2024-01-12 00:59:07+00:00): "after discussion with the author". Which discussion?
Zh9567 (2024-01-12 16:18:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/thomaspesnel/history#map=7/3.130/101.690
It is probably this user who made subareas of Kuala Lumpur incorrectly and messes up the relation of Kuala Lumpur and surroundings
rayth (2024-01-12 17:51:16+00:00): Oh thanks Zh9567. I just caught up with the issue on the Telegram group 😅
thomaspesnel (2024-01-14 03:24:32+00:00): @zh9567 you are right. I tried created the daerah sub districts for KL but ended up out of my depth and creating more issues than anything else having also no way out than relying on the help of @rocainunwired to revert back most if not all edits I had made 


I am still interested to make sub districts but need a more careful approach and learn the right way to do it without messing up other relations.
Hufkratzer (2024-01-08 22:51:21+00:00): Hi,
You have retagged the building to a riding centre (tag leisure=horse_riding). I think that this was not a good idea. Each building should have a building tag, otherwise it will not be rendered as a building on the maps. If the building is an indoor arena you can use building=riding_hall and the iD editor has a preset for that.
The tag leisure=horse_riding is for a complete riding centre (not for just some of it's buildings); in this case it is represented by https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351529199 (Colraine Equestrian Centre) with leisure=sports_centre + sport=equestrian, which is an alternative tagging. 

Related:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aleisure%3Dhorse_riding
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Driding_hall
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1008067851 (example)
IThinkIStillLoveYou (2024-01-09 08:48:35+00:00): Have altered as suggested and used the preset 'Indoor Riding Arena' which seems to use the bulding=riding_hall tag
Metzor (2024-01-08 19:12:06+00:00): Hallo lille2000,

Ich habe die Stuttgarter Straße hier wieder repariert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146040724

In dem Änderungssatz ist die leider was verrutscht:
https://osmcha.org/changesets/146029979

Lädt leider etwas länger, weil der verschobene Knoten auf  dem Stadtteil-Landuse gelandet ist und es dann recht viel laden muss für den Vergleich.

Schönen Abend
Metzor
lille2000 (2024-01-08 20:22:06+00:00): Danke. Mit ist nicht bewusst was ich falsch gemacht habe. Vermutlich einen knoten aus versehen wohin geschoben?

Ich habe noch ein paar Treppen im Weinberg eingezeichnet. 

Ist das OK? Wenn ja, mache ich ich die anderen Treppen auch noch rein.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146042347#map=16/48.5403/9.2986
Metzor (2024-01-08 21:04:06+00:00): Ja, gern. In iD passiert das halt leider schnell, weil das Programm immer alle Daten lädt und es kein Editierschutzmodus gibt, in dem man die Daten zwar anschauen kann, aber nicht verändern kann. Ich mag ja Vespucci sehr gern auf Android...

Laut osmcha ist das verrutscht, als du den Toom in Obi umgetaggt hast.

Danke für die Frage zu den "Stäffele"! Ich finde es schön, wenn man sich so zu den lokalen Gegebenheiten austauschen kann! Diese als öffentliche Treppe zu taggen... Ja, darüber sollten wir mal gut nachdenken.

Es führt jedenfalls dazu, dass diese im Fußgängerrouting als normale Treppen gewertet werden. Es ist schon länger her, dass ich eine solche hoch gelaufen bin, aber ich erinnere mich an:
- teils sehr hohe Stufen
- teils viele kaputte Stufen
- sehr schmal
- eher für die landwirtschaftliche Nutzung gedacht, nicht als öffentlicher Weg (?)

Warst du letztens dort? Würdest du dich als Durchschnittsspaziergänger ärgern, wenn du dort vom Navi drüber geschickt wirst?

Wir könnten noch das wiki und die community durchforsten, ob es da schon ähnliche Fälle gab. So spontan fällt mir foot=agricultural ein 🤣

Schöne Grüße!
Metzor
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-01-12 08:38:24+00:00): Reviewed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146029997
Hufkratzer (2024-01-08 23:03:48+00:00): Hi,
You have tagged the building leisure=horse_riding but each building should have a building tag, otherwise it will not be rendered as a building on the maps. If the building is an indoor arena you can use building=riding_hall and the iD editor has a preset for that.
The tag leisure=horse_riding is for complete riding centres (and not for buildings). In this case the riding centre seems to be https://www.facebook.com/p/Chiverton-Riding-Centre-100056007231652/. I would recommend to map it with a separate object (area or node), e.g. like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1008067851 (Eccleston Equestrian Centre or https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4920681807 (Eborlands Equestrian Centre)
eggie (2024-01-08 15:14:11+00:00): Dag ths..


Beter gewoon de gebouwen verwijderen en een nieuw vlak landuse= construction intekenen.
Mvg..
eggie
eggie (2024-01-08 16:02:33+00:00): landuse = construction aangepast
eggie (2024-01-08 17:28:15+00:00): Voor missing maps begonnen buiten Nederland en daarom nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen... Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Dodko (2024-01-11 20:08:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1238065408/history
pridal si budovu na existujúcu budovu, to len stačilo zmeniť geometriu. Teraz treba jednu z budov vymazať.
bxl-forever (2024-01-08 14:50:01+00:00): Hello,

Welcome to OSM.

I know you are still learning because this is new to you.  It may be useful to have a look at the documentation of the tags you are using: the OSM community has been writing a very comprehensive wiki with documentation about every tag.

For instance, "ele" is a tag aimed at storing a numerical value about the elevation (or altitude) of a place.  It is very rare to use it.  If you mean the height of an object, use "height" instead.  This tag also takes a simple value in meters, e.g. height=16 and not a bunch of text.  If you are unsure, you can fill the "description" tag, which is used to store a text describing what it is.

Same for material: this tag stores simple values, e.g. metal, wood… but be aware that if you fill a complicated text string no single third-party app would be able to understand it.
pfg21 (2024-04-24 09:03:47+00:00): не делай заливку больших площадей под одно. это в корне не верно.
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-28 00:02:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147993534, 147993538, 147993527, 147993537, 147993522, 147993535, 147993517, 147993518, 147993530 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of user Barroszt in 2024 that affect Torun, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146515808
Map-Peter (2024-01-08 18:52:18+00:00): Hallo Martin,
 
willkommen zurück! :-)
 
Das musste ich korrigieren. Bitte schau dir das an damit du es nächstes Mal richtig machst:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146040091 .
 
Gruß Peter
 
PS:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix
SwedenMapEditor (2024-01-08 19:33:48+00:00): Jag menade Fisketjärn.
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-21 02:23:46+00:00): Please use "Q" to square the buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146032903
djerm (2024-03-22 13:50:13+00:00): Thank you, I will do so in the future
dpolovinkin (2025-09-15 13:10:25+00:00): why did you delete data about all the buildings there instead of correctly retagging them as abandoned:building=yes? their ruins are still there

to be honest, this changeset has to be reverted and changes to be done properly, you can't just delete a lot of data like that

are you going to do it?
Khidistavi (2025-09-28 14:49:41+00:00): This was already discussed and clarified in the local Telegram group.
mga_geo (2024-01-09 06:51:29+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez ajouté des "stop_position" en fin des membres de la relation route=bus.
Normalement le rôle doit être "stop..." et ce membre doit être positionné après le membre "platform...".
Marc
XioNoX (2024-01-09 07:30:43+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour le retour, j'apprends en effet comment tout ça fonctionne.
Je vais continuer mes corrections aujourd'hui et rectifier ces erreurs.
mcliquid (2024-01-08 17:41:15+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
xeruf (2024-01-08 18:07:26+00:00): sorry, this was a collection of leftover changes of the last weeks from OsmAnd which does not provide an easy way to group by location after the fact, I usually stick to that ;)
Fischkopp0815 (2024-01-09 05:05:05+00:00): Weißt du etwas über die Gebäude und die Biogas-Anlage auf der Fläche? Sind die inzwischen abgerissen?
eggie (2024-01-08 15:55:26+00:00): Hi GU  Do you mean charging_station iso point?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-01-08 16:06:07+00:00): changed into amenity=charging_station
GenericUser82 (2024-01-08 16:10:23+00:00): Yes
eggie (2024-01-08 16:25:38+00:00): Jolly good.. You may change 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146034612#map=19/51.94087/5.89549&layers=N

as well.
Greetz,
eggie
Leo Slager (2024-01-09 11:49:27+00:00): Dag Robert,
Je hebt nu de Utrechtsebrug op slot gezet voor alle verkeer.
Is dat wel juist ?
Zie ook opmerking 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4059405#map=16/52.3379/4.9142
Robert Weide (2024-01-09 12:43:32+00:00): Nee, zeker niet. Ik heb het teruggedraaid.
gscholz (2024-01-10 07:39:58+00:00): Hi Tominna,
welcome to OSM. This changeset has created several errors like duplicate nodes and overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=17.71243&lat=40.65850&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=17.85872&lat=40.64920&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146034057


I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please watch out for the errors your editor shows you (see the list above). Please study the basics of OSM before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.6

Kind regards
Guido
BCNorwich (2024-01-09 08:15:59+00:00): Hi, You've mapped lots of your new highways on top of existing highways. This disrupts routing so I've removed all the duplicated sections.

If a highway needs amending it's OSM practice to do this to the existing highway, thus maintaining OSM history. 

Regards Bernard.
peddlermedia (2024-01-10 17:29:58+00:00): its not highway it is local street
BCNorwich (2024-01-10 17:44:10+00:00): Hello, 

Thanks for responding. A local street or any street is classed as a highway. Please see here:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway   The page explains that everything from a motorway to an unpaved path is a highway.

Anyway my point was to inform you of the problems with duplicating highways. Also OSM's best practice of correcting existing features instead of mapping over them.

If you need any help or further clarification please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
peddlermedia (2024-01-14 15:52:12+00:00): so, what should i do next
gendy54 (2024-10-29 22:55:30+00:00): Bonjour,

Tu l'as choppé pù le nom Route de Nîmes. Je ne trouve rien dans Pifomètre à Congénies et à Aujargues
MacDony (2024-10-30 06:34:47+00:00): Bonjour Gendy54,
Le nommage "Route de Nîmes" n'est pas de mon fait.
J'ai uniquement revu la géométrie des segments
Bonne journée,
Denis
dreua (2024-01-08 15:58:07+00:00): The position is correct by the way, the previous note was correctly removed.
Thsmap (2024-01-08 17:16:31+00:00): Eén bijgebouw van de Breestraat 21 is niet gesloopt, ik heb deze in een recentere edit teruggebracht. Tevens (tijdelijke) wegen toegevoegd.
eggie (2024-01-08 17:21:17+00:00): Oke...  Zal even de BAG gegevens opsnorren die bij dat gebouw horen.
Wegen in aanleg kun je mappen als highway=construction construction=residential.
Dat zou je nog kunnen aanpassen.
Nieuwe BAG import kun je aanvragen via het forum van OSM in het draadje BAG importverzoeken.
Dan moet er wel al gebouwd worden.
Mapse
eggie
Thsmap (2024-01-08 17:35:23+00:00): Ter verduidelijking, dat bijgebouwtje stond er al, en blijft ook in de ontwerpen staan. De tags van die wegen zijn aangepast. Bedankt voor de assistentie.
eggie (2024-01-08 16:09:53+00:00): amenity charging_station..?

charging_point is still a proposal.

Greetz
eggie
literan (2024-01-09 19:51:18+00:00): движение здесь не запущено. На ЯНдексе перекрыто. Т.к. комментарий вообще от балды, откатываю.
AlexLabrada (2024-01-14 02:13:16+00:00): Sorry,it seems by Google earth that it is finished
AlexLabrada (2024-01-14 02:13:42+00:00): At least partially
literan (2024-01-14 09:35:56+00:00): Google Earth, Google maps are not appropriate sources to make edits in OSM.
mavl (2024-01-14 14:34:10+00:00): @AlexLabrada  
Do you have explicit permission from Google company to use data for impove OSM?  
  
"OSM contributors are reminded never to add data from any copyrighted sources (e.g. Google Maps or printed maps) without explicit permission from the copyright holders."  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright
AlexLabrada (2024-01-15 14:30:27+00:00): No, it was just a comment, there are alternative sources of information, I am sure local contributors can be more accurate
AlexLabrada (2024-01-15 14:51:05+00:00): Indeed. yandex is showing that the traffic is open here
mavl (2024-01-15 16:13:53+00:00): Yandex.Maps is copyrighted source.
literan (2024-01-15 16:53:31+00:00): AlexLabrada, it's not true. Yndex shows that there's no open traffic here (black lines):
https://yandex.ru/maps/213/moscow/probki/?ll=37.731990%2C55.741355&z=17
AlexLabrada (2024-01-17 16:42:08+00:00): OK, I have checked that there is no traffic there, but is it correct to tag it as "construction" if it is already finished and still closed to the traffic?
literan (2024-01-18 16:56:04+00:00): it's not finished - some underground communication are digged, and there are some issues with lighting, fences, road signs

this data is from tthat forum https://roads.ru/forum/topic/31957-yuvh-uch-1-2-ot-svh-do-ulitsy-grayvoronovskaya-i-soedinenie-s-ttk/
eggie (2024-01-08 17:18:56+00:00): Welkom bij OSM De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
Abe Cer (2024-01-08 19:14:42+00:00): Super! Thank you!