piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
AkuAnakTimur (2023-11-21 12:29:39+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Just a heads up that it's not allowed to use any Google products in order to improve OpenStreetMap.

Sorry for this interruption.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright#trademarks
pitfire (2023-11-18 07:06:56+00:00): Hallo fanaticTRX,

danke für Deine Beiträge und willkommen bei OSM.

Zur weiteren Information ein paar Links auf deinen e mail account.

Ich denke über die  Gebäudehöhe "DE:Key:height" (height=262) sollten wir nochmal sprechen?

Gruß pitfire
andergrin (2023-11-18 09:03:20+00:00): Доброго дня. Спільнота змінила порядок слів у назвах вулиць. Спочатку йде слово "вулиця", а потім назва
mike140 (2023-11-18 09:34:25+00:00): Я в курсі. Схоже автоматичне виправлення валідатора криво спрацювало
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2024-09-30 08:40:22+00:00): Merhaba bazı sokakların ve işletmelerin adlarını silmişsiniz. Neden sildiniz? Sokak adları mı hatalıydı? Başka bir sebebi mi vardı? Yoksa yanlışlıkla mı sildiniz?
gscholz (2023-11-18 08:16:59+00:00): Hi VaneGómez,
can you please participate in the communication here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143986002#map=17/-25.28940/-57.61654

Guido
wireguy (2023-11-17 13:33:49+00:00): Instead of delete/add, how about keep the history? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144138082
eggie (2023-11-17 15:12:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Het adres nr 5 komt nu 3x voor..  Langverwacht ligt buiten het gebouw?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
s777n (2024-09-16 10:27:54+00:00): Удалил. Вы продублировали уже существующую точку. И пожалуйста не добавляйте описательные имена такие как магазин, колонка и т.п. в имя.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#%D0%98%D0%BC%D1%8F_%E2%80%93_%D1%8D%D1%82%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B8_%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-17 13:52:34+00:00): thanks for a fix!
arjunaraoc (2024-01-03 10:36:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my partial cleanup vide  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145833112
Please update tag values as per the naming guidance at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

Happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144139001
moje_konto (2023-11-17 13:36:51+00:00): Wątpie by takie mikro odcinki dróg miały sens. Komplikuje to aktualizacje, każdy fragment trzeb edytować osobno, łatwo któryś pominąć.

Skąd w ogóle pewność, że granica biegnie prawidłowo? Na pewno nie zostało to potwierdzone w terenie, bo niby jak można ustalić do czego należy taki mikro kawałek, więc edycja pod naniesioną granicę, a nie survey.

Jeśli już to trzeba było wydłużyć część drogi od strony cmentarza zamiast wydzielać kolejny fragment.
gscholz (2023-11-19 10:42:32+00:00): Hi emarv,
this changeset has created several errors regarding self intersecting lines and displaced ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=20.06839&lat=49.82505&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144139222

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
emarv (2023-11-19 13:03:10+00:00): Thank you. I have reverted changset.
felipeeugenio (2023-11-17 21:16:05+00:00): HOla Mateo, los parques no son puntos, son áreas (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark)

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144139467
felipeeugenio (2023-11-17 21:15:12+00:00): Hola, Buenas tardes.
Vemos que agregó un semáforo ahí. Pero no parece ser que en verdad haya un semáforo. Que es lo que intentó hacer? Estamos para ayudarlo. Gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144139551
fester7 (2023-11-20 21:41:30+00:00): Ik heb het toch nog even verder aangepast. De parkeervakken voor het laadplein zitten aan de buitenzijde. De binnenzijde is een stoep. Er zijn dus geen extra wegen benodigd voor het laadplein.
hocu (2025-02-21 14:42:40+00:00): Merhaba,

Katkılarınız için teşekkürler.

OpenStreetMap üzerinde kısaltmalar konusu biraz sorunlu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations

Cadde, sokak ve bulvar adlarını girerken lütfen kısaltma kullanmayın, 1470. Cd. yerine 1470. Cadde, Akasya Cd. yerine Akasya Caddesi gibi.

Bir yolun adını değiştiriyorsanız, varolan adı silmek yerine başka bir etikete taşıyın. Şöyle ki, eğer sokak/cadde/bulvar adı değiştirildiyse, eski adını "old_name" etiketine, sildiğiniz ad yolun yaygın şekilde bilinen adıysa "alt_name" etiketine taşırsanız, aramalarda bu yolları bulmak daha kolay olur.

Teşekkürler.
trigpoint (2023-11-17 16:03:10+00:00): Hi
You still are not quoting the sources you are using for these changesets or replied to previous comments.

Are you sure you have the change in the right place?
IMS DriveSync Support (2023-11-21 11:37:21+00:00): Change has been made based on photographic evidence provided showing the signage,
SomeoneElse (2023-11-21 11:49:26+00:00): Can you provide a link to the sources?  It's pretty unusual for a speed limit to be raised in this way (though I can think of one similar example).
MarcoR (2023-11-18 08:38:35+00:00): Grazie per aver ridisegnato l'edificio 🎉
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144140625
Compatie (2023-11-25 16:36:10+00:00): Bonjour,

Faites attention à la géométrie des bâtiments. Vous avez déplacé des points de délimitation de bâtiments. J'ai rectifié cela.

De plus ce serai mieux de faire un résumé des modifications.
rskedgell (2023-11-21 11:28:34+00:00): Whether or not a mapper based in Vietnam likes or dislikes the documented and correctly used tourism=attraction tag is irrelevant. Please revert and don't inflict your personal tastes on local OSM contributors.
rskedgell (2023-11-24 08:30:28+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144397714

If you don't like the tag, there's nothing to stop you creating a proposal to deprecate it.
Casey_boy (2025-07-06 13:49:26+00:00): Can I check on the status of this footpath? It was originally mapped as a public foothpath but you changed access to private. However, the path is still showing as a public footpath on Staffordshire CC's PRoW map, so it doesn't seem access rights have legally changed. It does seem as though it was temporarily closed a few years ago for HS2 works but appears re-opened?
confusedbuffalo (2025-07-11 08:06:58+00:00): Hi, I don't recall the reason for the change of access. It could well have been a temporary closure, so feel free to revert it to being open
Casey_boy (2025-07-11 08:59:32+00:00): OK, thanks. Done in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168784528
citrula (2023-11-17 17:24:06+00:00): Are these kerbs all actually flush? My understanding is that flush kerbs are completely flush with the road with no lip at all.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144141274
kaleidoscopica (2023-11-17 19:58:41+00:00): I didn't actually see your comment until later, but I believe you're right - I was confused about the distinction between the two. I reverted all the kerbs I'd changed!
citrula (2023-11-17 20:20:33+00:00): I was confused about the distinction as well until recently. The wiki really could use some better pictures of both, or maybe a diagram or something.
HansWürstchen (2023-11-26 20:37:33+00:00): Hallo AndreasE111, schade das Du nicht in der Lage bist auf Nachrichten, oder CS-Kommentare zu antworten, aber weiterhin falsche Namen einfügst, nicht der Weg heist so, sondern die Route und die ist bereits seit zwölf Jahren korrekt erfasst.

siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143914177
AndreasE111 (2023-11-27 13:04:14+00:00): Die Wege wurden von mir als "Harzer Naturistenstieg" benannt, weil diese eben nicht mehr als diese auf der Karte gekennzeichnet und mit Ihrem Namen zu erkennen waren. Sie haben angeführt, dass diese als "Route" bereits erfasst sind. Was nützt dies, wenn diese Routen (Damit die Namensnennung der Wege) jedoch nicht in der Karte zu erkennen sind, bzw. entfernt wurden. Wenn sie eine Verknüpfung zwischen der Route und der Karte herstellen, währe diesem Disput genüge getan. Übrigens gibt es tausende von Straßen welche einen „Eigennamen“ haben und so in OSM benannt wurden. Möchten sie diese auch entfernen? Übrigens entsinne ich nicht Ihnen ein "Du" angeboten zu haben.
MichS (2023-11-27 17:33:31+00:00): Hallo,

der Harzer Naturistenstieg ist wie ein Kollege geschrieben hat als Wanderroute erfasst. Die Route ist sehr wohl auf einer Karte zu erkennen.
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=15.0/51.5603/11.1875

Die Namensgebung kann entfernt werden.

MFG

M
Langlaeufer (2023-11-18 14:18:40+00:00): Hallo Ulrich,
wie ist der Weg den beschildert? Fußweg mit Radverkehr frei?
Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144141502
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-26 15:55:50+00:00): Hello! I am taking look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1224787988 and man_made=heap in general and I am quite confused by huge number of 

man_made=heap natural=bare_rock

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Anatural%3Dbare_rock seems to be not intended for pile of stones, and is in general used in this way
moje_konto (2023-11-17 16:08:44+00:00): Przecież już było level=1, zachęcam do poczytania wiki opisującej znaczniki.

Druciarstwo tylko utrudni wyszukiwanie, nie wiem jak zadziała taki pseudo numer budynku.
Jakka (2023-11-17 16:35:39+00:00): mouvais code ce n'est pas un building ... terrain ou il y a des building see landuse= *
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/705812605
Jakka (2023-11-17 16:33:11+00:00): swimming_pool OK access=private ?
urbalazs (2023-11-18 06:59:19+00:00): Szia vacsati! Az egyik útról leszedtem pár felesleges címkét, az „access=private” bőven elég. A „fixme” címkébe írt szöveg teljesen felesleges, mert egyrészt nincs mit javítani (te már megtetted), másrészt senki sem fogja elolvasni. A „locked=*” nem alkalmazható vonalas objektumra, csak pontra vagy területre. A kapukon bőven elég. A „name=Privát” szintén felesleges, mert az út tulajdonsága már tartalmazza ezt az információt, ráadásul hibás is, mert az útnak nem ez a neve.
gscholz (2024-02-23 07:36:42+00:00): Hi mcliquid,
this changeset has left behind several errors regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=9.67680&lat=47.37327&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144142301

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?

Due to bugs in "osm-relatify" the roundabout is affected here. Please do not destroy roundabouts, keep them intact.

Kind regards
Guido
mcliquid (2024-02-23 07:58:16+00:00): Dear Guido,

Thank you for bringing these issues to my attention. I have reviewed the changeset and have addressed the errors you mentioned regarding overlapping ways. I have also ensured that the roundabout affected by the bugs in "osm-relatify" remains intact.

You can verify the fixes made in changeset 147800698: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147800698.

If you notice any further issues or have any other concerns, please don't hesitate to let me know.

Best regards,
mcliquid
gscholz (2024-02-23 08:10:20+00:00): Hi mcliquid, 
thanks for your quick response. A section a the northeast (direction Dornbirn) of the roundabout is still duplicated.
Guido
mcliquid (2024-02-23 08:12:52+00:00): Hi Guido,

thanks again, also fixed this one.

All the best
mcliquid
eggie (2023-11-17 15:14:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Lijkt me oke. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
literan (2023-11-17 15:42:43+00:00): grassland это дикий луг. Наверное, здесь газон все же - заменю.
sirorezka (2023-11-17 15:58:37+00:00): Да, спасибо!
5m4u9 (2023-11-19 23:34:17+00:00): hola, cuál es la razón de quitar la ciclovía? ya no existe (la retiraron)?
Firefishy (2023-11-17 17:58:06+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Happy mapping. Great to see you using Every Door.
GUFSZ (2023-12-03 13:23:05+00:00): Ist er still gelegt oder scheint er nur stillgelegt?
mp747474 (2023-12-03 20:29:27+00:00): Hm also die verlinkte Webseite spricht hier m. E. eine sehr eindeutige Sprache:

"ACHTUNG:

Der Platz ist dauerhaft geschlossen!

Keine Anfahrt möglich!!!"

Man kann das wohl kaum anders interpretieren als dass der Campingplatz nicht mehr aufmacht...
Myazyk (2024-02-05 12:32:24+00:00): Антоне, тут міст іде через ріку, а не ріка у кульверт захована

А ше міст той аварійний і збоку є тимчасовий об'їзд, який хтось (не ти?) видалив

Не нанось на карту дурниць
eggie (2023-11-27 10:58:50+00:00): Dag Mattijs...

De tagging hoort eigenlijk te zijn landuse=onstruction. Ik pas even wat aan.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144143861

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-11-27 11:44:37+00:00): Typo landuse=construction
MattijsLeon73 (2023-11-28 17:20:40+00:00): Oh dat moet een autocomplete typo geweest zijn, leisure=construction slaat natuurlijk nergens op :D. Bedankt voor de aanpassing
eggie (2023-11-28 17:23:15+00:00): No problem  :)
Mevess (2023-11-22 09:39:38+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi supprimer les tag check_date=* sur les commerces ?
Est-ce lié au fait que l'on ne sache pas quel tag a été vérifié à la date indiquée ?
Bonne carto !
NJ
gileri (2023-11-22 21:50:23+00:00): Salut NJ,

Tu vois juste.

C'est une modification "secondaire" au changeset, c'est à dire que je ne suis pas parti pour supprimer check_date, mais lorsque je modifie l'objet, je ne peux pas le laisser (comme le tag source), vu qu'il n'est plus d'actualité.

Ces tags ne devraient être présents que sur les changesets. S'ils sont mis sur les objets, ils devraient être limités à des tags individuels car peu de gens peuvent vérifier toutes les propriétés de l'objet d'un coup.

Dernier point, généralement ces tags (check_date, source, etc.) ne sont pas mis à jour en même temps lors des futures modifications. Cela veut dire que lors de leur application, ils ont une valeur quasi-nulle (ils devraient être sur le changeset), et lors des modifications futures ils peuvent être néfastes car incorrects. Et je vois ça très souvent.

Éric
citrula (2023-11-17 17:05:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144144084
VlIvYur (2023-11-22 15:25:46+00:00): Hello
There is no sea or ocean for warships. It's place_of_wOrship
gscholz (2023-11-24 07:47:34+00:00): 

Hi Santanaloba53,
your recent changesets have created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes
and building shapes which are be far too large:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-71.74433&lat=18.03692&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144144290

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-11-28 17:38:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144558481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting allegedly Google-sourced changes prior to redaction.
canfe (2023-11-21 16:30:37+00:00): Non bisognerebbe attribuire ad un intero edificio un numero civico.
E' invece corretto dargli un nome se lo ha.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144144555
gscholz (2023-11-21 06:52:58+00:00): Hi Santanaloba53,
your recent changesets have created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes
and building shapes which are be far too large:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-71.74433&lat=18.03692&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=1144144566

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-11-28 17:38:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144558481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting allegedly Google-sourced changes prior to redaction.
felipeeugenio (2023-11-17 20:22:01+00:00): Hola Mateo. Buenas tardes.
Necesitamos saber la fuente que estás usando para agregar tantos nombres. Es de vital importancia que nos respondas. Te agradecemos.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144144945
gscholz (2023-11-18 09:03:54+00:00): Hi Santanaloba53,
this changeset has create a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes
and building shapes which are be far too large:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-71.74433&lat=18.03692&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144144951

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Henry572 (2023-12-02 12:28:53+00:00): Hallo Los Chicos,
Danke für die Ergänzung von OpenStreetMap! Ich habe noch eine kleine Korrektur beim Format der Öffnungszeiten vorgenommen (Komma statt Semikolon an einer Stelle). Ansonsten sieht alles gut aus, mich wundert nur, dass die Öffnungszeiten auf der Webseite anders sind.
Gruß, Hendrik

Hi Los Chicos,
Thansk for contributing to OpenStreetMap! I've fixed a little bit of formatting in the opening hours. Everythibg else looks good. I'm just a bit confused because the opening hours on the website are different.
Hendrik
eggie (2023-11-17 16:22:26+00:00): Hoi jjjj 
Mooi... weer actueel. 
 Ik heb even een note=  met uitleg toegevoegd anders is het in de korste tijd weer een fietspad. Op de rotonde heb ik al eerder een note gezet. 

Groet
eggie
gscholz (2023-11-18 09:03:17+00:00): 

Hi Santanaloba53,
this changeset has create a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes
and building shapes which are be far too large:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-71.74433&lat=18.03692&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144145584

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-11-24 07:43:56+00:00): Hi Santanaloba53, 
these errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
Trevor_1 (2023-12-16 13:34:04+00:00): Reverted
osmoj (2023-11-22 22:54:21+00:00): Reverted in changeset/144306289
CurlingMan13 (2023-11-21 03:16:28+00:00): Why did you delete a lake?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144146487
CurlingMan13 (2023-11-21 03:15:16+00:00): This is not a water hazard...  This is a lake.  I have reverted your edit in part or full.
MxxCon (2023-11-18 05:00:42+00:00): Hello.
Please note that "Program=" is not a standard tag in OSM. This kind of information probably should be entered as description=
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144147207
gscholz (2023-11-20 07:20:47+00:00): 

Hi Santanaloba53,
this changeset has create a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes
and building shapes which are be far too large:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-71.74433&lat=18.03692&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144147212

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
MxxCon (2023-11-18 05:17:05+00:00): Hello.
If you are interested in adding more indoor details, consider using https://indoorequal.org to see what such features would look like and https://osminedit.pavie.info is an editor that has more features specifically intended for indoor mapping activities.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144147221
Jakka (2023-11-17 17:24:43+00:00): a bon pratique est de ne pas chevauchement des landuse
A landuse n'a en principe un destination vineyard ou wood ;)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1224816301#map=19/50.60448/3.71318&layers=D
gscholz (2023-11-24 07:54:10+00:00): Hi Santanaloba53,
your recent changesets have created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes
and building shapes which are be far too large:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-71.74433&lat=18.03692&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144147891

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
フーヴァー　リー (2023-11-18 06:36:18+00:00): 兄弟你这个不太对啊，杨高南路永泰路出入口是在道路内侧，杨高南路高青路往南方向上中环的话需要从外侧转入内侧，公交也是这么走的
Oke Ris (2023-11-18 07:59:21+00:00): 位于外侧的地面道路是临时的，全部完工后出入口是在外侧
フーヴァー　リー (2023-11-18 08:26:15+00:00): 这样572路、780路、795路也画不了了，因为杨高南路华夏西路在道路中间，而非辅道。辅道只能在华夏西路左右转弯，无法中间转弯。三林路往杨高南路向北转弯后不能进入杨高路高架，只能进入华夏西路跨线桥新增的单车道跨线桥，同时也是杨高路高架的高青路出口。这些都是错误的。而且这块区域既然我原来更改了，也会根据后续开通情况进行维护。
DiogoBaptista98 (2023-11-28 16:48:05+00:00): o continente faz parte do norteshopping pelo que a relaçao do centro comercial deve incluir o mesmo
PedroMTG13 (2023-11-28 17:14:08+00:00): Sim. A relação deveria incluir
BCNorwich (2023-11-18 09:02:26+00:00): Hi, Please consider making route relations for these routes. The reason is that you now have sections of duplicated paths. Where two routes share a single path line there should only be one path mapped, then the one section of path is added to each route relation. Duplicating highways should be avoided as it disrupts routing.

Regards Bernard.
leafy420 (2023-11-18 18:20:57+00:00): Hello Bernard, thank you for taking the time to provide your suggestion. I have updated the path accordingly.
Regards Sehaj.
arjunaraoc (2023-12-07 12:18:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Use naming conventions as  in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144148390
gscholz (2023-11-18 09:04:21+00:00): 

Hi Santanaloba53,
this changeset has create a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes
and building shapes which are be far too large:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-71.74433&lat=18.03692&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144148573

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-11-21 06:53:52+00:00): Hi Santanaloba53,
this errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2023-11-24 07:46:44+00:00): Hi Santanaloba53, 
due to your missing response, I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
Szymson (2023-11-21 16:41:23+00:00): Ten tor nie jest do niczego używany, po co go oznaczać jakby odbywały się po nim regularne kursy?
P_kawa (2023-11-26 11:18:28+00:00): W takim razie ten tor powinien zostać oznaczony jako nieużywany