piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
map per (2023-05-30 12:04:42+00:00): Hallo jngt,

gibt es hier wirklich zwei Bänke? (1) und (2)?

Viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8833417436
(2) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10860006465
jngt (2023-05-30 16:58:52+00:00): Hallo map per, 
vielen Dank für den Hinweis! Mein Karte hatte die aus irgendeinem Grund nicht dargestellt, aber mein Edit ist tatsächlich ein Duplikat. Tut mir leid, ich entferne ihn wieder.
Viele Grüße
jngt
map per (2023-05-30 17:56:02+00:00): Super, danke!
gscholz (2023-05-06 07:01:58+00:00): Hi bonazeto,
your recent activities have left behind errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=11.24483&lat=43.85395&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-05-06 07:02:01+00:00): Hi bonazeto,
your recent activities have left behind errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=11.24483&lat=43.85395&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
LockOnGuy (2023-05-01 12:45:24+00:00): Thank you! keep up the great work! You're doing in amazing work!
BaghdadiMapper (2023-05-01 12:48:05+00:00): Thanks
Carto'Cité (2024-06-19 09:33:20+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour cette mise à jour.

Est-ce que les escaliers mécaniques ont été supprimés, ou sont-il en travaux ? Dans ce dernier cas il est préférable de les conserver en changeant le tag en disused:highway=steps. 

Sais-tu quelle est l'ampleur des travaux et où ils en sont ? 

Antoine de Carto’Cité pour Transilien.
Simlapse (2024-07-26 06:46:07+00:00): Bonjour,
En effet, au moment de cette mise à jour, les escaliers mécaniques étaient bel et bien été supprimés dans le cadre de la rénovation de l’entièreté de la gare (https://maligned.transilien.com/2022/11/21/lieusaint-moissy-debut-des-travaux-de-mise-en-accessibilite-de-la-gare/)

J’ai prévu de retourner sur place dans quelques jours afin de mettre à jour la gare (notamment les escaliers/escaliers mécaniques ajoutés) après les travaux censés s’être terminés ce mois-ci.

Simlapse
englu (2023-05-03 09:48:12+00:00): Hi, I have a question about access restrictions that you've added in this changeset. These changes broke pedestrian routing in Valhalla. For example on track 242057212 you've added bicycle=no and foot=no, but actually it should be bicycle=private and foot=private like there is motor_vehicle=private. The same for way 533333426. On way 242057213 there's bicycle=no, which means that vehicles can drive there, but bicycles can't - is it correct? This kind of set is proper for highways, but for tracks - I don't think so. Are there any signs on site that indicate those changes in access? Could you change it to private for foot and bicycle as well?
mapperue (2023-05-03 11:46:58+00:00): Hi, this area is a national park, where pedestrians and cyclists are prohibited from entering, but the road sign allows entry of vehicles by the landowners.
englu (2023-05-03 14:08:44+00:00): On those roads which I've mentioned are hiking and cycling trails, so entrance is allowed. I understand that landowners are allowed to enter, but thet can enter with vehicle as well as by bicycle and on foot. That's why bicycle=private and foot=private would be better than bicycle=no and foot=no. Do you have a picture of the sign with restrictions for bicycle and pedestrians?
silversurfer83 (2023-05-02 20:30:21+00:00): Gude :)

Kleine Bitte:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Danke und Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135569098
ToniE (2023-05-01 11:25:37+00:00): Hi,

Wann werden die Straßen denn fertig gestellt sein?

Mhh, sehe garade auf der MVV-Seite https://www.mvv-muenchen.de/fahrplanauskunft/fahrplanaenderungen/index.html?tx_solr%5Bfilter%5D%5B0%5D=categories%3AMVV-Regionalbus für 263 und 263V, dass diese bis Ende des Jahres anders fahren

VG
Toni
ToniE (2023-05-01 13:14:52+00:00): Alles angepasst.
mctheduck (2023-05-01 14:03:44+00:00): Hi Toni, vielen Dank!
osmviborg (2023-05-01 11:28:33+00:00): 👍
osmviborg (2023-05-01 13:35:07+00:00): 'oneway=no' fortæller at du må køre begge veje på stien, så det er fint som det er.
aTarom (2023-05-01 14:27:28+00:00): Hola lukant,
gracias por editar,
creo que el tag
"access"="conditional=no@(...)"
es 
"access:conditional"="no @ (...)"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89440929/history
así lo entiendo según la wiki, puede ser?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions
Saludos cordiales
lukant (2023-05-01 15:00:36+00:00): Sí, tienes razón, he revisado la documentación y actualizado mi cambio. Muchas gracias!
jaap de vries (2023-05-05 06:51:42+00:00): Ook hier weer regelmatig buiten Dukenburg en Lindenholt de operator op de aed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10794757446  
De stichting geeft zelf aan:
Wie zijn wij?


De stichting AED Dukenburg zet zich in om stadsdeel Dukenburg, en sinds 2016 ook stadsdeel Lindenholt van de gemeente Nijmegen hartveilig te maken.
jaap de vries (2023-05-05 06:52:04+00:00): Loop je alles even na?
jxpsert (2023-05-05 12:16:21+00:00): En toch hebben ze daarbuiten ook AEDs. Grote sticker “Stichting AED Dukenburg” op de kast, met het telefoonnummer erop.
jaap de vries (2023-05-05 13:24:49+00:00): Die op de marienburg zal ik controleren als ik daar komende week langs loop, maar het blijft raar hoor omdat de stichting dit niet aangeeft op hun website.
jxpsert (2023-05-05 13:27:46+00:00): Mariënburg heeft een image tag, waarop de sticker duidelijk te zien is. Ook bij het Valkhof. De site van de stichting is al een tijdje outdated. Waarschijnlijk staan ze daarom niet allemaal erop.
jaap de vries (2023-05-05 13:33:47+00:00): Als deze info outdated is dan kan het geen kwaad om het allemaal nog eens na te kijken of het wel klopt.
Op de website vindt ik nog wel een nieuwsbrief 3 uit april en meer recente informatie.
jaap de vries (2023-05-05 13:38:44+00:00): Daarnaast is zomaar informatie vanuit google maps, image overnemen is volgens de OSM regels niet toegestaan. Buiten ter plekke controleren of deze informatie klopt wordt aangeraden, zeker in dit geval.
jxpsert (2023-05-05 13:41:01+00:00): Uhh.. ik heb de foto zelf gemaakt. Dan mag ik die informatie wel gebruiken lijkt me?
jaap de vries (2023-05-05 14:05:55+00:00): Maar dat gaf je eerder niet aan en op google kom je ook image tegen van deze aed.
jaap de vries (2023-05-05 14:08:30+00:00): Maar goed als jij eerder aangaf dat de stichting waarschijnlijk verouderde informatie heeft staan op de website moeten we e.e.a. wel uitsluiten.
jxpsert (2023-05-05 14:12:13+00:00): Zal ik anders een source=survey neerzetten bij alle AEDs die ik zelf bezocht heb? Dan hebben we een overzicht van AEDs die we nog moeten (lees: kunnen) bevestigen.
catdreamer (2023-05-07 08:04:23+00:00): access=yes是必要前提，單指定foot=yes OSM還是會顯示為無法通行。
另山徑還是以highway=path來標示為宜
請多參閱OSM WIKI map features裡的標示規則與範例
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page
Emilius123 (2023-05-01 13:23:34+00:00): Nice, danke.
user_3022894 (2023-05-31 20:16:56+00:00): Hi Michael,

der Bahnsteig von Gleis 102 in Essen-Steele ist tatsächlich witziger Weise nur 76 cm hoch, obwohl er Teil eines Mittelbahnsteiges ist. Ich habe das jetzt so gelöst, dass ich die beiden Bahnsteige der Gleise 101 und 102 in zwei separate, aneinander grenzende Flächen aufgeteilt habe. Darüber wollte ich dich nur kurz informieren.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
Rubenke (2023-05-01 11:59:51+00:00): Als jij denkt dat mensen door muren kunnen lopen en niet bestaande wegen tja dan heb je hier ook niet veel te zoeken...
je hebt het echt niet op een rijtje he, vieze narcist
ChehrehBargi (2023-05-03 17:30:20+00:00): باسپاس از شما برای تصحیح کارهای این خرابکار
eggie (2023-05-07 21:40:05+00:00): Dag Rubenke.. Het lijkt erop dat de de edits die zijn toegevoegd als construction door de voorgaande mapper  op 2023-05-01 al weer hebt verwijderd?
Hoe zit het dan met die adressen?
MVG
eggie
Rubenke (2023-05-08 10:29:31+00:00): Die Adressen moeten idd aangepast worden en vallen allen onder NewYorker
Maar ik wacht er even mee aan gezien Tilia_J er een hobby van gemaakt heeft deze change set te reverten. Dan is de moeite weer voor niks...Dus eerst maar even zien hoe lang dat dit blijft voor ik er mee verder ga.
eggie (2023-05-08 11:20:27+00:00): Oke.. bedankt voor je reactie..
Probeer wel zaken op betrekkingsniveau te houden.
Ieder probeert er het beste van te maken..
Mvg
eggie
Warin61 (2023-05-02 00:19:43+00:00): Hi
Way  	963500214 is in error. 
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.25781&lat=-42.79120&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

As they are  separate buildings they should have 2 separate ways in OSM.
Andy_T_56 (2023-05-02 03:24:35+00:00): Quite right. I have fixed this. Thanks for pointing this out. Cheers, Andy
Langlaeufer (2023-05-01 19:32:15+00:00): Hi, Juan,
ist der Weg so wie es in den Daten steht als Fußweg "Radverkehr frei" beschildert oder stimmt das garnicht?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135570802
JuanCarlos80 (2023-05-01 21:54:36+00:00): Oh stimmt. Ich hatte jetzt eher nach dem allgemeinen Aussehen kategorisiert, aber du hast recht, die Beschilderung sagt, dass man als Radfahrer dort Schrittgeschwindigkeit fahren muss.
Eino81 (2023-10-15 12:53:01+00:00): Hi R3gi, just asking, did you walk on this path, or did you just add that here based on other maps?
R3gi (2023-10-15 14:53:30+00:00): Hi Eino81, yes, I walked there in the summer, they should be still present. You can notice them in Czech IPR aerial view photos too. They are basically just a grass paths used by dog owners on their walks…
Eino81 (2023-10-15 16:41:27+00:00): I was there today. I found the souther one, that was clear, but the one, which comes from the bridge... Honestly: not. At least the end, where the two parths should meet. There was high grass. But, if you agree, I remove the biking option for that one. I was with bike...
R3gi (2023-10-15 16:57:13+00:00): Sure, please update it according the current state in the terrain. From my knowledge those paths are there for years, but they are both informal and maybe also seasonal. Marking them as unsuitable for bikes should be okay, the path around is definitely much better for bikes.
Sammyhawkrad (2023-05-02 04:57:18+00:00): Hi Kwabena Danso,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for contributing to the map in Ghana. You are on the right path of having every feature of your community on the map: adding them yourself.

You may add the name of the village instead of having "Village" as name. 

Happy mapping
Best,
Sam
Kwabena_Danso (2023-05-02 10:29:22+00:00): Hi Sam,
Thank you and I really appreciate been part of this big family of Mappers. Your comment is well noted.

Best regards,
Kwabena
Sammyhawkrad (2023-05-03 00:45:35+00:00): Sure, you're welcome. If you are not already there you can join the community discussions on Telegram with this link: https://t.me/osmghana
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-05-11 13:47:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135978400 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-05-11 13:48:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135978400 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
silversurfer83 (2023-05-02 20:35:34+00:00): Moin cayenne11

kurze Anmerkung zu access Tags:
Die setzen wir nur nach Beschilderung vor Ort bzw. den gesetzlichen Regelungen. Siehe hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

Für alles andere gibt es scale tags. Guck zb mal bei https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:horse_scale zum Beispiel.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135572964
archpdx (2023-05-02 06:24:28+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thank you for your first contribution.

It is important to note however that the 'forestry' field is used to specify whether forestry vehicles such as tractors are allowed on certain features rather than denoting tree cover (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/Key:forestry).

I recommend mapping each tree instead as individual points instead.

Happy mapping!
kuhni74 (2023-05-24 16:00:11+00:00): auch diese Gebäude sind abgerissen
kuhni74 (2023-05-24 15:39:10+00:00): das ehem. Wildschek-Fabrik ist zwar im Luftbild noch sichtbar, wurde aber 2022 abgerissen!
houtari (2023-05-05 17:13:30+00:00): Hi!

I've created some Milk Churn Stand Maps that search for the 'man_made=milk_churn_stand' -tag. This edit of yours has now dropped this feature from these maps. Is this 'disused:man_made=milk_churn_stand' really the standard way to indicate disused features? And what does disused even mean in this case? If it indicates that this object no longer serves its original purpose then we would need to add this tagging to all features in Finland. According to its homepage this stand was in original use between 1960-1967. Btw. the wiki suggest using the form  'disused=yes'
Greetings Markku, MCS mapper from Finland
danieldegroot2 (2023-05-06 09:55:20+00:00): Hey houtari,

Yes, it does suggest this for buildings. However, it could become ambiguous which aspect is disused. Another mapper may think the museum is disused, as this is a non-physical tag, and change it to disused:tourism=museum .. as to avoid this it may be better to, as recommended otherwise, only add the lifecycle tag to the part which is no longer relevant - in this case, the milk churn stand.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#How_to_tag

Regardless, as data user, you should use both disused:*=* and disused=* in your queries, as both of these tags are in use to describe something being disused. There may still be outdated tagging, exceptions or accidental mistagging.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:*#Former_use_(as_a_simple_tag)
(ignoring for a moment that milk churn stand is a relatively recent tag.)
houtari (2023-05-14 07:15:24+00:00): Hi! Sorry for not answering earlier. If the museum in this case would go out of business I would tag it with was:tourism=museum or disused:tourism=museum or something similar. So I do understand the need for prefixes when there's multiple things being mapped with one map feature. However in this particular case I just don't see the ambiguity with the milk churn stands and find using the disused prefix with them more as unnecessary complicating things and stating the obvious. They have all been long disused in relation to their intial purpose so maybe the historic tag could be more appropriate? As a OSM data user (both professionally and as a hobbyist) I've got used to be prepared to query the data in many ways, but whenever it's possible to simplify notation without losing any relevant information I would go for it.
eggie (2023-05-01 13:47:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 


Beter geen adresnode combineren. Dat werkt niet in OSM.  De adresnodes zijn import vanuit het Kadaster. Je mag ze wel verschuiven.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=135573884

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-05-11 13:48:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135978400 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
canfe (2023-05-01 16:05:10+00:00): Come già chiesto in passato: è una fontanella per bere tipo toret o è una sorgente con un tubo?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dspring
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135574292
eggie (2023-05-01 13:54:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
jaap de vries (2023-05-05 06:36:31+00:00): Ik zag dat je een Echte bakker had toegevoegd, ik heb nu de tags aangepast zodat het ook goed op de kaart komt.
Romwriter (2023-05-01 13:52:25+00:00): Fehler im Changeset-Kommentar, richtig: "source"="survey", nicht "source"="existing data"
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-05-11 13:48:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135978400 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-05-11 13:48:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135978400 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
ElliottPlack (2023-05-05 22:33:43+00:00): Hello there and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thank you for adding the new Solstice Valley Trail at the Waterworks Park!

A few tips to get you started on your mapping quests: 

1. Type a little bit more about your edits when you write changeset comments. "adding path" doesn't say much. Instead try to tell what you mapped, why, and how. Here's a guide: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#How_should_I_write_Changeset_Comments No two comments should really be the same.

2. Avoid crossing the boundaries of a boundary when crossing them. For instance, in this edit you'd snapped the new path to the park boundary. That path can cross it without touching.

3. Please add trail surfaces! If you were there, you could survey the surface type, e.g., dirt or ground. That is helpful for path mapping.

Otherwise, keep up the good work.

--  
Elliott Plack  
for the OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group  
and Maryland-based mapper
ElliottPlack (2023-05-05 23:03:19+00:00): Example changeset comment. I corrected the boundary here so you don't need to worry about that. Just keep it in mind in the future.
ElliottPlack (2023-05-05 23:03:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135759049
TheFalcon3a (2023-05-08 11:50:46+00:00): Hey Elliott, thanks for the tips.

I added this path with a GPX file I received from MORE, who built the trail. I'll be more careful about snapping to borders, didn't even realize I did it or that it was a problem. I didn't add any additional info such as trail surface because I haven't actually hiked it yet, but I'll update once I've been there. I know it's mostly dirt/ground (I don't know what the difference is, as far as which to enter), but I'm pretty sure there are some grass sections, so I figured I'd leave it unlabeled instead of having it be partially incorrect.
ElliottPlack (2023-05-08 14:16:33+00:00): Hi there, that's great! I know MORE and appreciate their work. And, I especially appreciate your work in the arena of mapping paths. Please keep it up. It is a passion of mine as well. I've done a project with the staff and Friends of Patapsco Valley State Park to map all authoritative trails there in precise detail and have done similar project at the various reservoir watersheds. I hike and trail run, but not really MTB--something I'd love to try.

If you don't know the surface, totally fine to leave blank. I will often put in the type of 'unpaved' as a placeholder when I know its not a paved path, but not much else. On the topic of surface, OSM has weird surface types that don't always line up to American English. Some trail ones to watch for:

- gravel: only used on trails and tracks that have golf ball-sized gravel. Examples would be BGE access roads where they dump gravel in as the bed.
- compacted: what we mainly think of as "gravel". The NCR trail is compacted. Its a mix of fine gravel and dirt smashed into a rollable surface.
- fine_gravel: pea sized gravel that is loose and hard to ride on any bike. Not common.

If you find new trails, I'd love to know about them! I do a fair bit of exploratory OSM hiking/running, so if you'd like to, we could exchange contact infos or send them via OSM messaging.

Don't worry about the boundaries too, I fixed the ones I noticed.

Also, one other tip: the OSM standards for tagging route color are tricky. The way to do this is by setting up a route relation and then putting that information on the route. There's instructions on the wiki but it is an advanced process that may require other software. If you find some of them, let me know and I'll help you. You can also see all the trails with routes using this waymarked trails tool https://mtb.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=13.0/39.2426/-76.7486 

The example above is PVSP.

Happy trails, please feel free to ask any questions.

Elliott
Edelsalami (2023-05-01 15:52:33+00:00): Hi Otten, bist du sicher, dass die Fläche um das Krankenhaus als Park klassifiziert werden kann? Diese umfasst in der jetzigen Ausdehnung große Parkflächen, Wege, Gärten, und anscheinend nicht-zugängliche Baumflächen. Mir scheinen die Flächennutzungen hier doppelt bzw widersprüchlich vergeben zu sein.

Gruß
Edelsalami (2023-05-01 15:54:34+00:00): Aus Interesse: gehe ich Recht in der Annahme, dass Streetview247 einer deiner Alternativ-Konten bei OSM ist?
user_3022894 (2023-05-02 19:44:19+00:00): Es ist schon auffällig, dass es jetzt mit diesem Account hier wieder weitergeht nach ca. 2 Jahren Inaktivität.

Auf jeden Fall ist es ein ähnliches Muster.
ChrissW-R1 (2024-09-08 14:00:35+00:00): Why did you removed the relation of the Arabic League?
bxl-forever (2023-05-01 16:05:26+00:00): Hello,

Do I understand that the following streets are now strictly oneway with NO exception for cyclists?
This is a rather uncommon situation in the Brussels-Capital Region.  Are you sure?  Armchair mapping or survey here?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150184229
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35682620
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28775917
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19881057
ToniE (2023-05-01 15:07:27+00:00): Servus,

BING ist in der Regel keine gute Quelle für lage-genaue Objekte. Bing hat häufig einen Versatz. "Bayern 80 cm"is sehr gut.

VG
Toni
mctheduck (2023-05-01 15:18:45+00:00): Hi Toni, ich hab es mit mehreren Lufbildern gecheckt nachdem ich jeweils den Versatz auf die umliegenden Strukturen optimiert habe. Ich persönlich würde es jetzt lassen bis ich in der Gegend mit den ganzen Baustellen wieder etwas anfasse. Aber feel free to edit :-) Viele Grüße
ToniE (2023-05-01 15:26:36+00:00): Ich habe mal die Ludwigstraße, die Neubauten westlich davon (soweit sichtbar), Rathaus, ... nach "Bayern (80 cm)" angepasst. Alle anderen Luftbilder ESRI, Mapbox, Bing haben immer einen Versatz, der sogar je nach Zoomstufe unterschiedlich ist. VG
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-05-11 13:48:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135978400 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
Tresho (2023-05-01 14:38:37+00:00): #sottopassoVerona
habi (2023-05-03 07:26:19+00:00): Dans OpenStreetMap, nous avons tendance à utiliser des majuscules et des minuscules correctes :)

Correcté avec https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135645699