piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Larshei (2023-02-28 08:11:27+00:00): Ok, sorry. Ik heb eerder wel eens gevraagd aan mensen om mee te kijken en toen ging het wel goed met de routes, dus dacht dat het wel goed ging nu.

JOSM heb ik weleens proberen te gebruiken maar om dat onder de knie te krijgen begon me te veel op werk te lijken ;)

Bedankt voor de waarschuwing.
38446 (2023-03-08 14:47:16+00:00): In this changeset you duplicated https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10280879649.
Please also observe that names in Germany should be in German. Please remove https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10697485532.
gurglypipe (2023-02-27 16:31:40+00:00): Bing alignment offset: -3.4,-0.54
74523978 (2023-02-27 16:47:29+00:00): Waarom?
canfe (2023-03-01 06:44:59+00:00): Nel name non ci deve essere anche il civico.
I portici non sono layer -1
i portici non hanno il nome della piazza
Pregasi correggere i vari casi.
A disposizione per chiarimenti.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133094943
igi77 (2023-03-01 19:36:10+00:00): Rivisto, grazie.
Asim RP (2023-03-18 17:27:41+00:00): The link doesn't work: https://egazzete.mahaonline.gov.in
vinitraje (2023-03-18 17:41:19+00:00): Please contact https://dgps.maharashtra.gov.in for technical issues with website, the department is responsible for the maintenance of the website.
mini-me (2023-02-27 17:27:43+00:00): Похоже, вышел на новый уровень. Раньше только резал, а теперь ещё и склеивает. С волнением жду, чем ответит Dinamik...
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-25 02:24:00+00:00): Reverted by DWG for apparent vandalism, adding German names to items in Russia and strange comments: changeset/134090304
felipeeugenio (2023-02-27 22:45:56+00:00): Estimado. Cuál es el propósito de estas restricciones de giro? No tienen ningún sentido y se lo hemos comentado. Por favor responder los mensajes
woodpeck_repair (2023-03-03 00:50:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 133232206, 133232218, 133232224, 133232227, 133232225, 133232208, 133232216, 133232213, 133232177, 133232229, 133232203, 133232220, 133232198, 133232180, 133232189, 133224701, 133232215, 133232214, 133232188, 133232199, 133232207, 133232205, 133232182, 133232222, 133232186, 133232200, 133232191, 133232223, 133232209, 133232169, 133232230, 133232194, 133232197, 133232210 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import with unclear licensing in Madagascar
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-25 02:24:06+00:00): Reverted by DWG for apparent vandalism, adding German names to items in Russia and strange comments: changeset/134090304
limes11 (2025-06-14 19:36:48+00:00): Hallo,

wieso hattest du bei der Lahnsteiner Quelle drinking_water=no gesetzt ?

Klar schmeckt das stark nach Eisen, aber das macht es nicht ungenießbar.

Oder war das beschildert ?

Viele Grüße
limes11 (2025-06-15 08:39:06+00:00): Hab es wieder geändert, sonst vergesse ich das
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-25 02:24:13+00:00): Reverted by DWG for apparent vandalism, adding German names to items in Russia and strange comments: changeset/134090304
Noen (2023-02-28 11:42:55+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM! Comments are not useful if those who read them do not understand them. Please comment in English or a local language, please. 
Your first change set seems like a good one. Would you like to connect this path (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304435861) to the nearest road?
Rainero (2023-04-02 10:38:05+00:00): Hallo PasSp,

willkommen bei Openstreetmap! Da OSM ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt ist, erläutern wir immer einem kurzen Kommentar an unseren Änderungssätzen was und warum wir es gemacht haben. Damit können andere Mapper die Änderungen besser einschätzen und nachvollziehen.  
Hier steht nur Ü und an deinen vorangegangenen Änderungssätzen 1 und 2.  
Da du in 1 und Ü vieles gelöscht hast, was auf dem NRW-Orthofoto, dem Metropole Ruhr Luftbild und NRW-ALKIS vorhanden ist, würde ich dich bitten zu erläutern, warum du die Gebäude und Wege gelöscht hast. Bitte antworte hier am Änderungssatz, damit andere Mapper die Diskussion mitbekommen.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
chris66 (2023-08-02 09:18:13+00:00): Hi, 
ich denke die 3 Änderungssätze von PasSp sollten revertet werden.

Jede Menge unberechtigter Löschungen und Eintragen von Tischfussballplätzen auf dem Militärgelände !??
anastasia_ (2023-03-27 00:54:24+00:00): Здравствуйте! 
Подскажите, пожалуйста, почему изменили этажность и удалили тег подвала? Аналогично по поводу дома 13 к2.
Я вносила данные из документов на эксплуатацию+панорамы.
misha yakin (2025-05-10 01:04:20+00:00): Добрый день!
В ЖК Царская Столица практически все дома переменной этажности, в building:levels ставится максимальное количество (если building не разделён на building.parts) . В частности, в 9к1 максимум 9 этажей, а не 7.  Мансардного этажа нет, так что roof:levels=0 (если только не считать этажом надстройку над лифтом). 
С подвалом я погорячился, извиняюсь -- там есть технический подвальный этаж, в котором есть так же кладовки -- так что теоретически он доступен для жителей. В общем, вернул building:levels:underground там, где он был (или где точно знаю что доступен).
eggie (2023-02-27 20:39:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
JasonBob (2023-02-27 21:38:23+00:00): Do you have a source for the PSA Flight 182 monument site? You created a rock pinnacle monument here with an odd/outdated inscription, but I don't see evidence on street view or online articles stating that a monument was placed here.
jcr83 (2023-02-28 07:07:19+00:00): Hi,
Why did you remove all contact information of the restaurant "Le Mandarin" (address, phone)?
Snusmumriken (2023-02-28 13:45:02+00:00): ah, sorry, I made a mistake, it wasn't my intention to remove the phone number. I've corrected that. For the address I used a relation to associate the restaurant with the address. So it isn't duplicated.
jcr83 (2023-02-28 13:58:20+00:00): OK, thanks for your answer.
SomeoneElse (2023-02-27 17:47:04+00:00): Hello,
What is the source of your change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174566130/history#map=18/32.74353/-117.19409 ?
Is it a street sign somewhere, or something else?
Best Regards,
Andy
JasonBob (2023-02-27 17:48:32+00:00): What is the basis for this name change? Google provides 0 results for "Semper Fi Plaza". It doesn't appear on City maps either
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-27 17:30:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/957509466

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Celso Azevedo (2023-02-27 17:34:50+00:00): More info on the UK's National Health System website: https://www.nhs.uk/services/pharmacy/junction-pharmacy/FHH08
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 10:59:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
KartoGrapHiti (2025-02-01 18:40:02+00:00): Der Wirtschaftweg hat den Namen "Drei Schneidenweg rot" erhalten. Es scheint ein Wanderweg zu sein, der dann aber als Relation einzutragen wäre und nicht als Name der Straße.
https://bergundwanderfreunde-ulfa.de/wanderwege/
KartoGrapHiti (2025-02-01 19:16:36+00:00): OK. Ich habe es jetzt geändert: http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=15539617&noCache=true&_noCache=on
iandees (2023-02-27 20:49:35+00:00): When fixing map data, please fix the existing data rather than deleting and re-mapping it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133098666
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-27 18:20:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149652019

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
syntex (2023-02-27 21:32:56+00:00): Poprawione
gurglypipe (2023-02-27 18:43:28+00:00): Hi, thanks for all your edits in Ulverston recently!

Before you go too much further with adding and tweaking loads of things, you might want to double-check that the aerial imagery is properly aligned.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Align_aerial_imagery_before_tracing

From what I can tell, the offset needed for the Bing imagery in Ulverston at the moment is -3.4,-0.54. In other words, if you don’t align the imagery before starting editing, everything you draw will be 3.4m misaligned from reality in one direction, and 0.54m in the other. :)

The best way to consistently check the alignment against known ground truth is to enable the ‘OSMUK Cadastral Parcels’ overlay in the right-hand sidebar. It provides a consistent reference for alignment against property boundaries across the entire country.

I hope that makes sense, I realise it’s a little technical. I just wanted to catch you before you drew every building in Ulverston 3.5m off where they actually are!

Ta
noodlemaps (2023-03-01 16:39:45+00:00): Great, thank you for that bit of advice!  I will have a look at that and use it for future edits once I've figured it out - and check through my previous edits, too.
ALu68 (2023-03-01 07:35:26+00:00): Hallo himbie,

Willkommen bei OSM.

Bitte beachte, dass die Tags: key=value in englisch angegeben werden.

opening_hours = Mi, Sa 7:00-13:00 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10648454059/history

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening%20hours?uselang=de
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-27 20:20:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10697794507
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390038557
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537749096

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
LorenzoPesci (2024-12-09 10:49:33+00:00): Sembra una fattoria piuttosto che una stazione di servizio
Sicuro che sia corretto?
IU0HHU (2024-12-09 11:22:40+00:00): Hai ragione. Ora dovrei aver corretto. Grazie
LorenzoPesci (2024-12-11 11:39:20+00:00): e perché hai cancellato gli edifici?
Era sufficiente rimuovere il tag del bar e del carburante!
fai attenzione pe favore
eggie (2023-02-27 20:36:10+00:00): Eigenlijk kan die leisure=golf_course gewoon als een aparte transparant over de landuse heen en wat nu een mp is kan gewoon als landuse=grass worden getagd. 

Maar oke...  zo'n leisure kleurt ook groen. 
MVG
eggie
Da1ie (2023-02-28 18:41:42+00:00): Duidelijk, zal dat als alternatief ook in gedachten houden.
gpserror (2023-02-28 00:56:31+00:00): why didn't you close https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3576986
Sorry just pulling your chain and giving you a hard time:  :)
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-28 10:06:20+00:00): I guess I missed it!  lol.  Good catch.  So hard to keep up with these golf vandals.
maraf24 (2023-05-22 11:01:13+00:00): Coś poszło nie tak - zniknął budynek.
Nb. skąd taka nazwa "Cerkiew..."? Wikipedia podaje, że to jest obecnie kościół Matki Bożej Bolesnej?
Skąd greek_catholic, skoro to samo źródło podaje, że to kościół rzymskokatolicki?
Kamienne Krzyże Bruśnieńskie (2023-05-22 16:34:04+00:00): Jeżeli się Pan dobrze przyjrzy, na lewo za cmentarzem jest kościół Matki Bożej Bolesnej. Na Wikipedii według niektórych szacunków około połowa informacji jest błędna, stąd nie jest do ostateczne źródło prawdziwej informacji (edytowałem co ciekawe to hasło, ale do tej pory admini nie zaakceptowali zmiany). W Łówczy jest cerkiew greckokatolicka, po wojnie była użytkowana przez katolików, do 2022 roku, kiedy to wybudowano nowy kościół i katolicy przenieśli się do niego. Cerkiew obecnie jest opuszczona przez katolików, należy do "gminy" i jest zabytkiem. Przewodnicy oprowadzają turystów po cerkwi, z wyposażeniem cerkiewnym, a nie po obiekcie, który był użytkowany przez katolików przez pewien okres, to użytkowanie nie zmieniło jego oryginalnej bryły, historii i wyposażenia.
maraf24 (2023-05-22 19:03:11+00:00): 'Na Wikipedii według niektórych szacunków około połowa informacji jest błędna,"

Urban myth. Tak naprawdę to sporadycznie zdarzają się tam błędne informacje.

" (edytowałem co ciekawe to hasło, ale do tej pory admini nie zaakceptowali zmiany)."

Kiedy? Brak śladu po edycji w historii, brak info o istnieniu wersji nieprzejrzanej.

" W Łówczy jest cerkiew greckokatolicka, po wojnie była użytkowana przez katolików, do 2022 roku, kiedy to wybudowano nowy kościół i katolicy przenieśli się do niego."

Czyli informacje na wikipedii były poprawne. Być może są już nieaktualne-to jest do sprawdzenia.

"Cerkiew obecnie jest opuszczona przez katolików, należy do "gminy" i jest zabytkiem. "

Czyli nie jest to cerkiew i to od dawna, nie jest to amenity=place_of_worship ani denomination=greek_catholic. Tagowanie jest do poprawy.

'Przewodnicy oprowadzają turystów po cerkwi, z wyposażeniem cerkiewnym, a nie po obiekcie"

To wszystko jest do otagowania jako old_ oraz tourism=attraction.

Nb. nadal brak tagu budynku, który zniknął po tej edycji. To było świadome czy też jest jakiś bug w edytorze?
rab (2023-02-27 21:34:53+00:00): hi bkrc,
oneway tags are missing, also one section of the road is residential, the other is secondary
eggie (2023-02-27 20:38:29+00:00): De naam zal niet renderen, want er staat operator ipv name=

Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-02-28 10:35:16+00:00): operator aangepast naar name=
Da1ie (2023-02-28 18:23:41+00:00): Je bent me voor met de correctie, bedankt.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-27 19:30:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/987459609

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
lukbas (2023-02-27 20:43:00+00:00): W przypadku wsi i osad poza miastem stosujemy ich nazwę w miejsce ulicy. Na małych wioskach nie ma nazw ulic.
NorthCrab (2023-02-28 03:21:33+00:00): Witaj!

W takim przypadku, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

Kombinacja addr:city+addr:street jest stosowana dla adresów z nazwami ulic. We wsiach bez nazw ulic stosujemy addr:place.
NorthCrab (2023-02-28 03:25:33+00:00): Poprawiłem już ten adres. Był on duplikatem tego punktu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4337867606. W Polsce adresy przynależą głównie do budynków, a nie do działek. Dodanie w tym przypadku adresu do działki nie wygląda na poprawne. Pozdrawiam!
Hans Bieshaar (2023-02-28 18:10:30+00:00): Er zijn nu een hoop dubbele BAG adres nodes op Ridderhof en twee op de Kerkstraat (75 en 77) en een op de "Havenkade 71". Kun je dat repareren?
CJTmmr (2023-02-28 20:50:24+00:00): Dat was inderdaad niet de bedoeling. We waren samen tegelijk in hetzelfde gebied bezig. Nu gefixt. Goed dat je het zag
Kristen Vasosaust (2023-02-27 19:35:56+00:00): Thank you!
Frans S (2023-03-05 15:46:26+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133101372
ChillyDL (2023-03-06 12:37:45+00:00): Hello LaurieTra,
thanks for adding this camp site. Could you also give the sources, i. e. how you know it exists at this location?
Generally, it would be great if you could do so any time you add something, so others can follow. Thanks!
SzymonH (2023-03-01 12:31:56+00:00): Nazwa w tagu operator nie zgadza się z faktycznym numerem żłobka
ptarac (2023-03-01 18:23:40+00:00): Poprawione.
Frans S (2023-03-03 13:43:19+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133102006
ChillyDL (2023-03-07 19:32:05+00:00): Hello LaurieTra,
thanks for your contribution. Would you please also name the source of the information that this hotel exists at this position? Thank you.
hvalentim (2023-02-27 20:15:11+00:00): + Swings
snooozer (2023-02-27 21:00:39+00:00): Please split up your changes in smaller chunks if you edit different regions. Otherwise the whole world has your change in their recent history. Thank you.
silversurfer83 (2023-02-27 21:15:37+00:00): Hi Cliffek4,

since this is your 4th edit I'd like to say hello and welcome to OSM :)

Here (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets) is an article that explains the comment of fellow mapper snooozer. We'd appreciate you reading it and even mapping accordingly :)

Cheers
silversurfer83

(any questions? Why not peek into a chat: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers we usually don't bite)
RicoElectrico (2023-03-01 12:04:10+00:00): Hej, to chyba Twoja uwaga  - możesz ją zamknąć :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3577793
jodd (2023-03-11 17:34:13+00:00): Hallo oha,
danke für die ganzen Eintragungen! Ich habe mal die "Namen" der beiden Lüftungsschächte https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149993500 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149993501 in das Attribut description verschoben. "Abluft U-/S-Bahn" sind ja keine Namen.
VG Jo
sab27 (2023-03-31 14:22:33+00:00): Hi @KatQuan, Thank you for your contribution to this project! This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. The buildings you added are either enclosures or patterns you perceived in the vegetation. 

You should have gotten a notification for a comment I left for you in project 14341 - you can find a useful screenshot there and tips on how to avoid mapping buildings that don't exist. Thanks again for all your work and please keep mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133103006
RoseArrow (2023-02-27 21:12:24+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar Secure Watch Imagery 2022-12-24
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-01 08:33:12+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1188336712/history has barrier = g that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
what this tag means? Is it maybe supposed to be barrier=gate? Or is maybe some other barrier?
dudone (2024-05-01 19:04:19+00:00): Hi.  Many thanks for pointing this out.  I have changed to "gate". Dudley
A67-A67 (2023-02-27 21:33:47+00:00): In this change cycle lanes are mapped as cycle paths. 

I've removed these and changed it to the correct tagging for cycle lanes: the tag cycleway:lane on the road itself.
Josef73 (2025-04-27 05:50:43+00:00): Hello, can you specify where the device_charging_station is? Thanks
5R-MFT (2025-04-27 10:11:27+00:00): You can find it by your own but I searched for you: https://campingisladeons.com/servicios/tiendas-standard/ it says on each tent.
Josef73 (2025-04-27 14:58:44+00:00): Sorry for asking.
5R-MFT (2025-04-27 15:07:00+00:00): No Problem  :)
5R-MFT (2025-04-27 15:08:47+00:00): Like to go? I can recommend it out of high season
A67-A67 (2023-02-27 21:19:05+00:00): It seems that the Oostduinlaan has cycle lanes (painted), not cycle paths (physically separated).

These cycle lanes are mapped with the tag cycleway=lane on the road, not with separate ways.
SomeoneElse (2023-02-28 16:33:17+00:00): Hello,
It would be helpful to explain in a bit more detail why you re-added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150001201 .  I know from a separate email that it's based on a GPS trace, but it would really help other mappers if you explained a bit more about what you did.
Also, a highway=path on its own isn't very helpful - surely some other tags could be added here?
Best Regards,
Andy
Note_Fixer (2023-03-01 00:22:02+00:00): this is a landfill that goes to the top where it goes straight down to the road. used by all terrain motorbikes but not legal.
SomeoneElse (2023-03-01 00:26:39+00:00): ... so that would suggest informal=yes; access=no?
Note_Fixer (2023-03-01 13:15:05+00:00): path from top of hill down to sidewalk.
SomeoneElse (2023-03-01 13:32:45+00:00): Thanks - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150001201 now has much more details.
ftcat (2023-02-28 05:19:10+00:00): HI Kedrick,

Thanks for adding to the map of Lusaka. Please use the full name of the street names ie Mululu Street rather than Mululu St. The same with Road rather than Rd.
A67-A67 (2023-02-27 21:33:29+00:00): In this change cycle lanes are mapped as cycle paths. 

I've removed these and changed it to the correct tagging for cycle lanes: the tag cycleway:lane on the road itself.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-03-01 03:41:35+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة الأماكن الشخصية للخريطة العامة
bxl-forever (2023-02-28 01:37:04+00:00): Hello,

I am sorry to announce that your change breaks pedestrian routing entirely.

Since pedestrian infrastructure is not drawn in this zone, routing engines assume pedestrians will walk on the road—which is the only available path.

When you add "foot=no" on the bridge itself, the whole itinerary becomes impraticable.  To make it work properly, one needs to add a few footway connectors between the road and the cycle track.  (The reason is that the cycle track and the road are not connected, and routers never assume people teleport from one to the other, there has to be a connector somewhere, with adequate permissions).
And also add tags to confirm that the cycle track is not exclusively for cyclists but is shared with pedestrians.

There is a lot to improve here.  I’ll try to see if I can spend some time to fix it in the next days.  You can do it too if you like.
François Bronchart (2023-02-28 09:02:17+00:00): Hello, thank you for the review! 
From what I saw on site, the pedestrian path to cross the bridge is the cycle track, because the road is too dangerous without any sidewalk and there's even a little staircase from the east bank "vaartkant-Oost" for the pedestrians to access the cycle track (which is therefore a cycle and pedestrians track as opposed to the loop which looks more cycle-only). I have added "foot=yes" on the "cycle track" above the bridge and on the west part of the track, which is connected later to oudstrijdersstraat. I also have connected the staircase to the bridge and to vaartkant-oost. That should repair the pedestrian routing.
Tell me what you think about it!