piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JoaoPaixao (2024-09-24 08:44:53+00:00): The edit made doesn't make any sense, in this location the bridge doesn't connect to the stairs.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157025416
gscholz (2024-09-24 09:03:11+00:00): Hi JoaoPaixao,
thanks for your feedback. I have reverted this changeset so you can fix the way crossing here yourself. There are overlapping ways and ways on different layers which are connected to each other.
Kind regards
Guido
pyrog (2025-05-25 09:30:35+00:00): Bonjour,

Vous avez attribué le SIRET de "Les Saveurs de Joséphine" à "Cuisine Plaisir Saint Valery".

De plus ce POI est situé "n'importe où".

Depuis "Cuisine Plaisir Saint Valery" à fermé car on ne le trouve plus sur leur site web.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-05-26 08:12:45+00:00): Bonjour, Merci d’avoir corrigé ce point. Pour nous ce poi est encore ouvert, (nous sommes hélas tributaire des informations que l'on nous envoi.) Cordialement Alain
pyrog (2025-05-26 08:33:58+00:00): Bonjour,

J'ai vu après une longue recherche que ces 2 POI sont la même entreprise.
J'imagine qu'il y avait la franchise "Cuisine Plaisir" mais cela ne semble plus le cas.

Yves
elsy1 (2024-09-25 16:23:22+00:00): درود، این ویرایش شما خرابکاری محسوب میشه، بنده ویزایش اشتباه شمارا اصلاح کردم لطفا تکرار نکنید باتشکر
eggie (2024-09-24 08:01:21+00:00): Dag 3Develop

Zou het pand ook geen adres meer hebben?
Beter allee bedrijfsinfo verwijderen en het adres intact laten. Ik zal het herstellen. 
MVG
eggie
3Develop (2024-09-24 08:21:42+00:00): Goed punt. Het adres bestaat nog wel, lijkt me. Ik zal het voortaan op die manier doen.
eggie (2024-09-24 08:25:32+00:00): Top!
Patchanka (2024-09-26 16:50:56+00:00): bonjour

merci pour l'ajout de défibrillateur. Une info précieuse !

Pour le moment vous avez juste ajouté un point nommé "défibrillateur" ce qui n'est pas vraiment approprié.
Quand vous ajoutez un point il faut choisir dans la zone de gauche "Rechercher" taper "défibrillateur" ainsi vous aurez le bon type d'objet qui sera créé et non un point générique. De plus, le bon type d'objet étant choisi, on ne mettra pas de nom (sauf si l'élément en a vraiment un, mais je ne pense pas que ce soit le cas pour un défibrillateur).

Pouvez-vous corriger les deux que vous avez créé ? N'hésitez pas à me dire si vous avez besoin d'aide.
Hufkratzer (2024-09-24 17:36:04+00:00): Hi,
wieso hast du denn https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232216613 von pitch auf stadium umgetaggt? Auf den Luftbildern sieht die Fläche genau aus wie ein Reitplatz und Reitplätze werden in OSM üblicherweise als pitch getaggt. Ein Stadion müsste Sitzgelegenheiten für größere Zuschauermengen beinhalten, was der Reitplatz aber nicht tut.
Nordpfeil (2024-09-24 18:37:40+00:00): Kein Thema, hab's rückgängig gemacht.
ObscureAngel (2024-09-26 09:16:26+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre contribution :-)

L'agence Square Habitat est positionnée au niveau d'un bâtiment qui semble être dédié au Crédit Agricole. Avez-vous la confirmation qu'il y a deux cellules commerciales ? Si c'est le cas je modifierai le bâtiment dans ce sens.

Bonne journée et bonne cartographie :-D
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157027415
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2024-09-26 10:09:42+00:00): Bonjour,

Square Habitat est une filiale du crédit Agricole qui propose tout ce qui concerne l'immobilier

Bonne journée

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
ObscureAngel (2024-09-26 10:13:31+00:00): Merci pour cette précision.

Ici Square Habitat n'est pas une agence avec sa propre entrée mais plutôt un "espace" au sein des locaux de la banque c'est exact ? :-)
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2024-09-26 10:34:39+00:00): Oui c'est souvent le cas pour les agences Square habitat
ObscureAngel (2024-09-26 12:21:50+00:00): Merci beaucoup pour ces précisions :-)
Filip009 (2024-11-28 21:01:47+00:00): Zdravím, neotagovaná cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317823557
aharvey (2024-09-25 07:01:39+00:00): Generally OpenStreetMap practice is to "map what's on the ground" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground

In this case, from the imagery it does indeed look like there are footpaths existing here, seems doubtful the council removed them.

See also the documentation for mapping footpaths https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway=sidewalk
aharvey (2024-09-25 07:02:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157035383
nevw (2024-09-25 11:37:58+00:00): I think you will find that because the coastline has followed all through these canals instead of being closed of near the coast, you will need to add a coastline to this island too. I think the outer role was correct but didn’t check closely.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=coastline&lon=153.35428&lat=-27.87565&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=coastline%2Ccoastline_error_lines%2Cline_not_a_ring%2Cline_overlap%2Cline_invalid%2Cline_direction%2Cquestionable%2Ccoastline_error_points%2Cunconnected%2Cintersections%2Cnot_a_ring%2Cdouble_node%2Ctagged_node%2Ccoastline%2Ccoastline_error_lines%2Cline_not_a_ring%2Cline_overlap%2Cline_invalid%2Cline_direction%2Cquestionable%2Ccoastline_error_points%2Cunconnected%2Cintersections%2Cnot_a_ring%2Cdouble_node%2Ctagged_node
iqctnaus (2024-09-25 13:16:00+00:00): Thanks Nevw, I've looked at it again and changed it back to outer but theres quite a bit going on with the water in this particular section as it is also tagged as a water hazard for the golf course. Attempting to change it to a Coastline caused some issues with this water hazard that I couldn't resolve.
nevw (2024-09-25 13:41:08+00:00): Yes, I found it quite complex and couldn’t make much sense of why it was mapped as it is. Good luck sorting it out.
nevw (2024-09-25 14:31:58+00:00): I added another water relation MP but it hasn't rendered the island as yet...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18088652
Maybe having these two separate water mp around the island causes the problem...do there need to two separate areas?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17260477
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17260478
iqctnaus (2024-09-25 14:44:16+00:00): I've removed the Water Hazards from the waterway to test if these are causing the issue
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157086983
nevw (2024-09-25 14:53:29+00:00): Not sure how soon the changes to rendering of multipolygons may take.
See Tom Hughes reply to a community query…
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/slow-rendering-of-some-tiles-of-openstreetmap-standard/2188/4
nevw (2024-09-29 01:53:24+00:00): I added a coastline to Fairway Island to get it to render on the standard layer (and the Tracestrack Topo layer).
Another three island within the coastline were also affected and already had a natural tag. I the changed them to single member multipolygons and added natural=coastline to the way so that the ways did not need to be duplicated for the natural=coastline tag.
Feel free to revert/remove/alter if that doesn't suit.
Coastlines take longer to render...
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/82942/rendering-coastline-in-osm
nevw (2024-10-04 10:47:15+00:00): Finally rendered the four islands I added a coastline to but only on zoom 15 so far
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17260479#map=15/-27.86193/153.36614
Janjko (2025-01-08 15:10:43+00:00): Imena crkvi se pišu malim početnim slovom: http://pravopis.hr/pravilo/ostala-imena/100/
4004 (2024-09-30 00:41:05+00:00): а что там? раньше крест был
SomeoneElse (2024-10-12 14:28:15+00:00): This is just a revert with no comment.  Can you explain why the previous version was wrong and your version is correct?
In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157023417 they explained that that bit of grass that you can see around the green isn't part of the fairway.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-12 22:47:35+00:00): Apologies for changeset non comment.

I had replied to the private message directly and posted their message in the changeset discussion.

Satellite clearly shows the fairway cut surrounding the green. The "photo" referenced in the changeset comment is a diagram.

  Blixt has a history of bad faith multipolygon member double tagging to force compatability with the tgc course creator. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155702322 


see also https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=19615950
SomeoneElse (2024-10-12 23:18:55+00:00): I understand the frustration with the Golf software's inability to handle multipolygons, (and at people pretending that everything is a simple area instead), but that doesn't mean that _every_ fairway has to be a multipolygon, surely?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-13 08:26:48+00:00): Sure, its possible.
However Blixt has just been trying different things to see what sticks and I have no confidence that anything they claim is in good faith. I expect any allowed inaccurate mapping will get relayed back to tgc forums and gets propagated elsewhere. https://tgctours.proboards.com/post/808534/thread
gscholz (2024-09-25 07:31:32+00:00): Thanks for fixing this issue!
Guido
mgpx (2024-09-24 21:48:24+00:00): Több módosításcsomagban is átírtad egyes erdészeti utak behajtási korlátozását forestry-ről permitre. Az OSM-en a permit kategória azt jelenti, hogy a behajtási engedélyt rutinszerűen bárkinek ki fogják adni különösebb mérlegelés nélkül. Ha viszont az engedélyt csak szűk körnek, szigorú mérlegelés alapján adják meg, akkor megszorítóbb korlátozás a helyes (pl private vagy forestry).

Tudtommal a Börzsönyben egyedül a Kemence - Diósjenő erdészeti út az, amelyre (díjfizetés ellenében) bárki megkaphatja a behajtási engedélyt. Miből gondolod, hogy más burkolatlan utakon is hasonló a helyzet ?
Borzsonymentok (2024-09-26 16:38:30+00:00): Szia
teljesen félreértettem ezek szerint a kategóriákat, elnézést.
rskedgell (2024-09-24 16:04:45+00:00): Iron Square was originally tagged (not by you) as access=private, which would have been correct during construction. 

I've added ownership=private, but if it isn't gated it should probably be access=destination so that it's reachable by routing software.
acovaci (2024-09-24 18:56:10+00:00): Hi, it is currently not publicly accessible.
rskedgell (2024-09-24 22:12:57+00:00): Thanks for confirming.
rskedgell (2024-09-24 10:41:35+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding your business.

There are a couple of things you might want to change:

1) position - you are unlikely to be in the middle of the junction of Balloch Road/Ardoch Road and POIs which are "obviously" in the wrong place might get deleted by other mappers

2) business type - data consumers will probably process office=fence_supply_shop as if it were office=yes. If it's your office location, then office=company might be the best fit. If it's the location of a physical shop which customers can visit, you may want to add a shop tag.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop#Do-it-yourself,_household,_building_materials,_gardening

I've made a couple of minor tweaks to tags so that they will be parsed correctly by data consumers.
BCNorwich (2024-09-24 11:26:25+00:00): Hi, Just a bit more help, your premises can be easily seen on the Bing or Esri imagery in the iD editor. In that editor the Bing imagery can be selected via the Background Settings button on the right side of the page.

The location is better placed on the website store locator.
RE:屑 (2025-07-20 04:56:55+00:00): 胡球子画
eggie (2024-09-24 10:42:30+00:00): Dag Skoop  Svp geen adresinfo toevoegen aan een gebouwomtrek. Please don't add addesses to building shapes.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-09-24 10:45:56+00:00): Opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
skoop (2024-09-24 10:58:31+00:00): Thanks. Ik werd afgelopen week door een actieve contributor gewezen op de Every Door app die het makkelijker maakt om bijdrages te leveren. Goed idee om weer eens wat actiever bijdrages te leveren. Dank voor de informatie, ik ga er eens in duiken!
eggie (2024-09-24 11:01:51+00:00): Top! 

Die apps zijn overigens heel beperkt in het gebruik. Vooral die adressen en het overzicht houden.
Mapse..
eggie
VictorIE (2026-06-03 11:35:27+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/881598692/

name=* and name:ga=* are quite different here. Might there be some missing?

It might be useful to add a hyphen between the council name and the site name.
jonnymccullagh (2026-06-03 12:35:44+00:00): It's just missing the Newry, Mourne and Down bit but I used what was on the sign on the gate.
jonnymccullagh (2026-06-04 08:18:50+00:00): Link to the photo I took: https://ibb.co/CK1w7RKV 
The sign is kinda in 2 parts but I guess I could add all the wording.
VictorIE (2026-06-04 08:37:05+00:00): Fixed.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-24 10:10:55+00:00): 156986300 
156945044 
156938531 
156906565 
156899485 
156897409 
156858508 
156856130 
156815391 
156810733 
156788368
habi (2025-06-04 06:34:13+00:00): Ciao GartenStuhl
Ich würde das Ding hier nicht einfach als Sportfläche erfassen, sondern als https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycling%3Dpump_track
Gruss,
habi
GartenStuhl (2025-06-04 06:52:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167162895
thx
JJIglesias (2024-09-24 18:51:26+00:00): Esto es un error recurrente en tus ediciones. Te recomendamos que leas esto:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Viales

Por favor NO cambies las categorías existentes de ninguna via, sin consultar primero si tal cambio se justifica o no...

Gracias
os-emmer (2024-10-06 18:50:24+00:00): Hi Almorca and thank you for participating in the maproulette challenge I created. Is there a reason why you did not update the emergency=ses_station for this object?
eggie (2024-09-24 12:35:44+00:00): Dag Zentbeer. Ik heb de parkeerplaats losgemaakt van de wegem en ook de highway=service service=parking_aisle area yes van het vlak verwijderd. 
Dat waren nog foutjes van de voorgaande mapper.

Paar keer CTRL-F5 of wat geduld voor het effect.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-24 12:36:24+00:00): Ahh  Die fout zit overal in.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=157033793

Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-09-24 12:50:11+00:00): Ik heb alle parkings aangepast.
eggie (2024-09-24 14:16:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Zentbeer (2024-09-24 15:03:47+00:00): Dank je wel!
JJIglesias (2024-09-24 18:21:15+00:00): Hola, cuál es la razón para resaltar más estos caminos? En Bolivia, estamos siguiendo el criterio de poblaciones importantes se unen con carreteras importantes, las terciarias son las que se ajustan más a estas poblaciones rurales.

Esto es un error recurrente en tus ediciones. Te recomendamos que leas esto:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Viales

Por favor NO cambies las categorías existentes de ninguna via, sin consultar primero si tal cambio se justifica o no...

Gracias
Dawid2849 (2024-10-13 17:19:01+00:00): Ciężko powiedzieć, na ich stronie praktycznie brak informacji. Jeśli nie współpracują z np. Kościołem katolickim lub inną wspólnotą, to ja bym dał denomination=nondenominational
Oslomed Specjalistyczne Centrum Medyczne (2024-09-25 10:41:26+00:00): When would this point be published?
woodpeck (2024-09-24 12:35:10+00:00): Dear user Isocarras, please do not attach a name of "casa" to buildings you map. The name tag is only there for buildings with a special name like "Word Trade Center" or so.
woodpeck (2024-09-24 12:36:25+00:00): Dear Karoll Ustate, please do not name buildings, roads or other areas "Manzana, Karoll Ustate". This is not the name of the place and should not be on the map.
eggie (2024-09-24 14:19:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Op gebouwomtrekken zetten we geen adresgegevens. Die zijn er al via de importadresnodes.
Alle gebouwen zijn ook import vanuit het Kadaster.
Wanneer iets niet klopt kun je dit aan het kadaster doorgeven. iets veranderen heeft meestal weinig zin. Bij periodieke updates komt de oude vorm weer terug.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-09-24 14:23:48+00:00): Het adres heb ik weer verwijderd.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-25 22:11:55+00:00): Please don't add fake features.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157035891
eggie (2024-09-24 12:14:56+00:00): Even gekeken. 
De no left turn is aan de oneven kant incompleet.
via (node) ontbreekt
eggie (2024-09-24 12:16:33+00:00): ... en bij de evenkant ontbreekt ook de via (op de node) 

Dus die linksafbeperking nog voorzien van een via op de relatie.. en dan wel op de node.
eggie (2024-09-24 12:17:45+00:00): De niet keren relaties zijn oke. 

Kijk je zelf even?

MVG
eggie
LittleHelpFromAFriend (2024-09-24 12:42:50+00:00): Ik heb aan beide linksafbeperkingen de node (punt) op de hoek toegevoegd als 'via'.
Klopt het zo?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157038082
LittleHelpFromAFriend (2024-09-24 12:43:41+00:00): Kan je me toelichten waarom die 'via' erbij moet?
Of kan ik ergens de ontwerprichtlijnen terugvinden?
eggie (2024-09-24 13:09:03+00:00): Zie...
Je hebt altijd drie delen in een afslagrelatie. van- via en naar
Het wegdeel waar je vandaan komt is 'from' het punt wat je aanraakt is 'via' en het stuk waar je  niet naar toe mag is 'to'. 
Zo werkt een relatie... anders kan de router er niets mee. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Het is ook wel aardig gecompliceerd voor starters geeft ik toe.
eggie (2024-09-24 13:19:18+00:00): Maar .... het klopt zo als je alleen rechtdoor en rechtsaf mag.
eggie (2024-09-24 12:21:32+00:00): Dag Ki... Dit heb je verwijderd.
Ook het paadje naar het voetbalgebeuren.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=157036499

Dat lijkt me niet correct.

Paden achter een hek mogen overigens ook in OSM  Dan kun je ze wel voorzien van bv access=permissive en/of bij een gesloten hek en bord art 461 wvs van access=private
Ik zet deed even terug.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-24 12:22:53+00:00): reverted by changeset #157037316
eggie (2024-09-24 12:24:44+00:00): Ik heb het pad voor je gesplitst. Dan zou je het verder aan kunnen passen. 
MVG
eggie
ManuelB701 (2024-09-29 14:37:48+00:00): access=bus gilt schon lange als veraltet und ist zudem noch redundant mit bus=yes bzw. bus=designated (und ist natürlich unklar ob erlaubt oder gewidmet).
rskedgell (2024-09-24 13:08:42+00:00): Thanks for updating this.

Although the restaurant has closed, the building will still be there.

Rather than deleting a closed business, an alternative is to change the name tag to old_name, use a lifecycle prefix on the "main" tag (in this case amenity=restaurant) and remove the tags which applied only to the closed business. You could also add a check_date tag if appropriate.

The advantages of doing this are that the history of the object is preserved and users of apps like StreetComplete will be prompted to check if there is a new business operating there.

I've undeleted the building and updated the tags in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/487028114

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:check_date
Mr Le Bon (2024-09-24 13:11:36+00:00): Thank you, good information to know. I believe it is to be incorporated into the Premier Inn eventually.
Patchanka (2024-09-30 08:49:39+00:00): Bonjour
vous avez indiqué "Claude-Collin" comme nom mais il manque un bout, non ? Le nom officiel de la place, c'est bien "Place Claude-Collin" ?
merci d'avance
Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray (2025-01-14 16:41:51+00:00): Bonjour,
Oui, le nom officiel est bien "Place Claude-Collin"
Merci
Patchanka (2025-01-14 18:07:31+00:00): ok merci j'ai corrigé le nom de la place. bonne soirée
rskedgell (2024-09-27 06:42:16+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157156197
canfe (2024-10-06 08:05:52+00:00): Non mi pare che tu lo abbia rimosso, anzi lo hai messo il divieto di accesso!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157038002
Valerio Cardone (2024-10-08 13:53:50+00:00): Sì che l'ho rimosso, in questo changeset ho rimosso il tag "access=no".
canfe (2024-10-08 19:26:02+00:00): In effetti non c'è.
Non capisco. Forse non si era ancora aggiornata la mappa??
Valerio Cardone (2024-10-09 20:05:24+00:00): Può darsi, ci vuole qualche giorno perché la modifica si veda interamente.
cuzi (2024-09-28 20:44:55+00:00): Die neue Zufahrt stößt auf eine Straße, die Teil einer Buslinie ist, und an der Buslinie sind ein paar veraltete Informationen. Ich habe die Warnungen jetzt für diese Buslinie aufgelöst, aber generell kann man das auch ignorieren.
canfe (2024-10-06 07:55:23+00:00): No, non attribuire toilets ad un'area. Mettile come nodo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157038133
ivanbranco (2024-10-06 08:05:34+00:00): toilets=yes é un tag documentato e può essere aggiunto alle aree.

Mappare anche il nodo amenity=toilets é preferibile in quanto piú preciso ma la mappatura di Mapparoger non é errata.
canfe (2024-10-07 15:19:41+00:00): E' vero che si può aggiungere ad aree ma che che siano delle amenity.
Sennò aggiungiamo toitels anche alle Provincie e aggiungiamo le scool all'area dei comuni.
aseidel (2024-09-24 14:25:26+00:00): Liebe Greta,
kannst Du hier bitte nochmal die cycleway-Angaben überarbeiten? Der Tag cycleway:left:backward=yes	separate ist verquer. Wenn auf beiden Seiten Radwege vorhanden sind, müsste es cycleway:both=separate heißen. 
Danke Dir!
Herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
Nakaner-repair (2024-12-01 11:51:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159803318 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Henry Müller: attempts to add road constructions of short durations and edits against best practices
eggie (2024-09-24 13:23:59+00:00): Best lastig die accesstags..
Ik heb er alleen nog maar access=private overgehouden. 
foot hoef je niet te noemen op een voetpad. bicycle=no hoeft niet op een voetpad. Dat is default. . 
Het hek kun je intekeken op een node met barrier=gate access=private
Groet
eggie
Nakaner-repair (2024-12-01 11:51:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159803318 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Henry Müller: attempts to add road constructions of short durations and edits against best practices
Marek-M (2024-09-24 18:41:39+00:00): Cześć, czy np. ta droga https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/211783608 posiada gdzieś oznakowanie numeru drogi w terenie?

Rzadko to się zdarza ale się zdarza, więc może to jest ten przypadek. Jeżeli tabliczek z numerem drogi nie ma w terenie, to proszę zostawić ten numer w `unsigned_ref`, tak jak to było przed zmianą.
kornad (2024-10-16 10:45:04+00:00): Podbijam pytanie. W tej okolicy bardzo dużo dróg zostało prawdopodobnie błędnie oznaczonych jako 'ref=' zamiast `unsigned_ref=`.
wozder (2024-10-16 10:50:45+00:00): Cześć.
Błędnie zmieniłem oznaczenie tych dróg.
Poprawię to.
Nakaner-repair (2024-12-01 11:51:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159803318 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Henry Müller: attempts to add road constructions of short durations and edits against best practices
grelus (2025-02-01 16:50:24+00:00): cześć, dlaczego zmieniasz tagowanie dróg z 'unsigned_ref' na 'ref' ? Drogi, których numer nie jest widoczny na znakach powinny być tagowane 'unsigned_ref'. Zapoznaj się proszę z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:unsigned_ref