piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Allison P (2025-03-29 06:15:53+00:00): addr:city should be the postal city, in this case "North Salt Lake" rather than "City Of North Salt Lake"

It is a fault of NAD, but they still need to be fixed here
jeslop (2025-03-29 15:56:35+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164255126
jeslop (2025-03-29 15:56:36+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164255126
NeisReview (2025-03-29 07:30:14+00:00): #NameChanges

Hi, welcome to OSM.

In the past 12 hours, you have made numerous name changes across various changesets. This included modifying names as well as removing other name:*. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.

You can find an overview of the recent changesets at the following link: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=22687132
NeisBot (2025-03-29 06:30:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-03-31 19:49:37+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164291858 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164291868
Frans S (2025-03-30 11:04:23+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not include yards and courtyards into your mappings.
Best regards
BCNorwich (2025-03-30 07:07:18+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've reverted this changeset because the way added duplicates an existing highway which will disrupt routing.

Regards Bernard.
jeslop (2025-03-29 16:48:29+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164257325
BCNorwich (2025-03-30 07:30:51+00:00): Duplicated highway removed.
geomaniX (2025-05-13 13:41:01+00:00): Hi there!
Are you sure, that there are four fast charging sockets (type2 combo)?
According to the publicy available Ladesäulenkarte (Charging stations map) by the Bundesnetzagentur, there should be a charging station with two normal type2 sockets. Additionally, it's uncommon these days, that the type2 combo sockets only have 22 kW.

Kind regards,
geomaniX
jeslop (2025-03-29 16:48:30+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164257325
BCNorwich (2025-03-30 07:28:59+00:00): Duplicated highway removed.
BCNorwich (2025-03-30 07:25:55+00:00): Duplicated highway removed.
jeslop (2025-03-29 16:48:31+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164257325
BCNorwich (2025-03-30 07:23:06+00:00): Duplicate highway removed.
BCNorwich (2025-03-30 07:15:50+00:00): Duplicated highways removed.
BCNorwich (2025-03-30 07:34:48+00:00): You've made duplicated highways in nearly all your changesets. Please read the help pages and OSM guidelines before more mapping.

Duplicated highways seriously disrupt routing.
jeslop (2025-03-29 16:48:32+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164257325
jeslop (2025-03-29 16:45:45+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164257224
jeslop (2025-03-29 16:45:46+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164257224
jeslop (2025-03-29 16:45:47+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164257224
pyrog (2026-03-08 11:14:29+00:00): Bonjour Chaaach,

J'ai mis à jour les étapes 2 et 3 de la La Voie des Colporteurs :
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=18909428&type=relation

J'ai aussi mis à jour les géométries des sentiers en forêt avec la couche MNT LiDAR HD.
Et corrigé les lames directionnelles des poteaux et annoté 2 photos dont celle-ci :
https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?annot=3d4a55c3-d96f-4a02-9b14-8c85bf753a9f&background=streets&focus=pic&map=18.73/46.1461888/5.362154&pic=b6775212-79e1-4d26-9844-701404017ec0&seq=145d551e-e3ac-4762-b6a1-383f8b0b1816&speed=250&theme=age&xyz=30.54/0.79/65

Cordialement,
Yves — Groupe OSM Plein Air
jeslop (2025-03-29 16:45:48+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164257224
jeslop (2025-03-29 16:45:49+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164257224
bxl-forever (2025-03-29 09:29:29+00:00): I need to alert you that what you do in GNOME Maps does not just stay on you own computer but gets uploaded to the public OSM database.

⚠️ It is a very bad idea to reveal sensitive information about yourself.  And in any case, such information is not relevant for a public map.

Your edit has been undone.
tolisp (2025-03-29 11:24:18+00:00): Thank you!!!!
jeslop (2025-03-29 16:45:50+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164257224
nevw (2025-03-29 11:43:59+00:00): Hi, you have only mapped two nodes instead of a trail. A trail would normally be a line showing the path or track that you have travelled. A gpx trace of it may be uploaded which you then trace along in an osm editor to map the line, then add the right tags to define what you have added and to describe its characteristics.
jeslop (2025-03-29 16:45:51+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164257224
jeslop (2025-03-29 16:45:52+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164257224
NeisReview (2025-03-29 18:42:08+00:00): #NameChanges

Hi, welcome to OSM.

In the past 12 hours, you have made numerous name changes across various changesets. This included modifying names as well as removing other name:*. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.

You can find an overview of the recent changesets at the following link: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=22687228
NeisReview (2025-03-29 18:42:37+00:00): Ah, sorry, thanks jeslop !
jeslop (2025-03-29 19:05:29+00:00): No problem
jeslop (2025-03-30 08:18:35+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164276812
Filip009 (2025-03-29 17:04:04+00:00): Zdravím, prečo mažete cesty, ktoré podľa leteckých snímok existujú?
jeslop (2025-03-30 08:18:36+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164276812
Taya_S (2025-03-29 08:29:42+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164239006
jeslop (2025-03-30 08:18:37+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164276812
Frans S (2025-05-05 13:26:11+00:00): Thanks for mapping. 
Some remarks.
Esri imagery should be used. Read the instructions please.
Your mappings are very rough. You mapped complete plots as a building, despite they exist of several buildings, courtyards and walls.
Pleas map more accurate next time.
Check this page to see your mappings and the adjustments which I had to make.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=165845855

best regards
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-07 05:36:06+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164616539
jeslop (2025-03-30 08:18:38+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164276812
jeslop (2025-03-30 08:18:39+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164276812
martinst (2025-03-29 20:23:00+00:00): Können die vielen kleinen Änderungen (mit der App OsmHydrant) zu weniger Changesets zusammengefasst werden?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-29 08:35:16+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17479
NeisReview (2025-03-29 18:43:52+00:00): #NameChanges

Hi, welcome to OSM.

In the past 12 hours, you have made numerous name changes across various changesets. This included modifying names as well as removing other name:*. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.

You can find an overview of the recent changesets at the following link: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=22687368
NeisReview (2025-03-29 18:44:11+00:00): Ah, sorry, thanks Fizzie !
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-01 06:08:26+00:00): Not a problem, Neis! This time we beat you to it!
pitscheplatsch (2025-04-01 06:11:49+00:00): That's perfectly fine with me. 😊
gscholz (2025-04-01 07:29:46+00:00): Hi Andrea,
this changeset has create several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=16.00025&lat=37.92325&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=164238704

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:26:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
Pan (2025-04-01 23:57:39+00:00): Hi, Thanks for working on this  area. However, the path https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227513001 actually lost some accuracy. In particular if you compare with strava heatmap and also the fact that the separation between the track (still used by the local farmer) on the left is now merged with the path. I will try to fix that.
dafadllyn (2025-04-02 20:17:32+00:00): Hi Pan
Thanks for your message.
I’ve improved the course of the path in question using Swisstopo’s ‘SWISSALTI3D’ relief, which is more precise than Strava’s heatmap. So overall the path should be more precise now than it was before.
However, between 46.3318401, 6.8528583 and 46.3327066, 6.8530714 the path is not clearly visible on ‘SWISSALTI3D’. Compared with Strava there’s a significant discrepancy there. It seems that i recognised the course of the path there incorrectly. I’m therefore going to edit the path at that place again using this time.
However, i don’t see where i should have merged a path with a track. I’ve only combined two consecutive sections of a path. There was a very short section near Chamossin. (Unfortunately, iD reused the way number of the shorter instead of the longer way for the whole way, which now looks like i’ve deleted a path.)
Regards, Raphael
Pan (2025-04-02 21:20:58+00:00): Thanks for your reply. I had used both Swiss Alti 3D and strava to map because you are of course correct regarding the accuracy of Swiss Topo as compared to Strava.

I have to apologize for the "merged track" story. The track wasn't there before. I'll need to go there and survey where it ends exactly. 

Anyway, it's nice to see the map improved. :-)
dafadllyn (2025-04-03 19:35:23+00:00): Okay. No problem. Happy mapping!

By the way, if you are thinking of taking this path from Miex to Torgon, take heed: it is quite dangerous (narrow, slippery path on very steep terrain). In recent years, it has also been closed several times for long periods due to landslides.

Salutations, Raphael
eggie (2025-03-29 09:04:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Waarom hebben die gebouwen layer=-1? 
Liggen ze onder het maaiveld? 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-03-29 10:25:43+00:00): reverted by changeset #164242810

De faculteiten stonden al in OSM op de adresnodes.
Ik heb je edits teruggedraaid.
Hier zijn de gebouwen ingetekend als een building:part en een BAG gedeelte.
Het was al goed gemapt hier.

Op de noordelijke gebouw ontbreekt Utrecht. Dat zou je kunnen bijtaggen op de adresnode als dat de officiële naam is.

MVG
eggie
lankapuhelin (2025-03-29 17:45:50+00:00): Peukku!
Frans S (2025-03-29 11:49:18+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping. Often oversized.
C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.
G: Included the shadow of the building.
H: Included a yard of clearing.
Your mappings shows a rather big offset.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164239688
Frans S (2025-03-29 10:41:16+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Your mappings are not squared. 
Please take the time to read this document with tips and tricks how to improve your mappings.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?pli=1&tab=t.0

Please solve also the error shown by the issue triangle
 Best regards and keep mapping
NeisReview (2025-03-29 21:50:42+00:00): #NodeDragging

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for contributing to the map. I’ve reviewed your recent edits and noticed that at least one node of a way was moved. This can sometimes happen unintentionally, and it’s led to some unusual intersections or overlaps between street segments and other map elements.

Could you kindly confirm whether these changes were intentional or if they may have been made by mistake?

Thank you, and I look forward to your response!

---
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3716088589
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1281358315
kamilbogacki (2025-04-02 21:00:48+00:00): Nie chodziło o sieć FRAC? 
https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frac
mwk3 (2025-04-03 10:04:06+00:00): Dzięki, poprawiłem
NeisReview (2025-03-29 18:23:16+00:00): #NameTag

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I’ve taken a look at your recent edits, especially those involving name tags. Some of the names you’ve added caught my attention, as they seem a bit unusual. As noted in the OSM Wiki, the name tag should contain only the actual name of the feature—not descriptions, types, locations, family names, addresses, or other attributes.

Could you please confirm whether these entries were intentional or possibly added by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

---
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:name
NeisReview (2025-03-29 18:39:09+00:00): #NodeDragging

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for contributing to the map. I’ve reviewed your recent edits and noticed that at least one node of a way was moved. This can sometimes happen unintentionally, and it’s led to some unusual intersections or overlaps between street segments and other map elements.

Could you kindly confirm whether these changes were intentional or if they may have been made by mistake?

Thank you, and I look forward to your response!

---
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4906534134
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4803852
Maschero (2025-03-29 21:22:05+00:00): I can't retrace this change. It must have been done unintentionally. My intention was to change the name of the restaurant "Züribieter" to the new name "Pizzeria Da Chiara". Sorry for the inconvenience caused to you.
NeisReview (2025-04-03 05:16:18+00:00): Thanks for your reply.

Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164432306
Frans S (2025-03-30 11:03:54+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not cluster adjacent buildings or include the yard next to a building.
Best regards
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-29 09:20:53+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1372614706

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mueschel (2025-04-04 18:01:42+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the meaning of these tags?
  amenity = clinic
  emergency = yes
  emergency:medical = no
What kind of emergency is handled at this clinic, if it is not medical?
lpf452 (2025-04-05 12:46:31+00:00): *I'm not sure if I can use markdown here, but using markdown makes it better to insert citation links, so I'll use markdown for the following*

Thank you for your thorough review. I'd like to provide some additional context regarding the emergency service capabilities of this disease prevention center:

1. **Primary Function**  
This facility's main focus is on preventive healthcare, including vaccinations and health screenings. It doesn't offer comprehensive medical treatment. I've used the `clinic` designation to reflect its outpatient nature, in line with established healthcare mapping guidelines.

2. **Emergency Response**  
The center plays a crucial role in addressing public health emergencies, such as epidemic outbreaks or biosecurity incidents. This aligns with the mandated emergency response functions of China's CDC, as outlined in relevant public health legislation.

3. **Medical Emergencies**  
It's important to note that this facility is not equipped to handle acute medical emergencies like trauma cases or heart attacks. These situations are managed by nearby hospitals with appropriate emergency departments.

To more accurately represent the center's functions and avoid potential misunderstandings, I propose the following tag adjustments:

```osm
amenity = clinic
healthcare = centre
healthcare:facility = disease_prevention_center
emergency:public_health = yes
description = Specializes in public health emergencies (e.g., epidemic control, biosafety incidents). Not equipped for medical emergencies.
```

I've removed the general `emergency=yes` tag to prevent any broad misinterpretation of the center's capabilities.

For further reference, I've consulted established guidelines on emergency services tagging, WHO classifications of health facility types, and the official functional specifications of China's CDC.

I believe these changes more accurately convey the center's specialized role in public health emergencies. Your thoughts on these proposed adjustments would be greatly appreciated.
mueschel (2025-04-05 13:21:09+00:00): Thanks for the long description!
I'd like to suggest the following additional tags to mark it as a special thing during emergencies and to explicitly exclude normal emergencies:

emergency=no
emergency:amenity = clinic
emergency:hazard_type = epidemics

The keys are all already in use, albeit not in the context of a clinic for epidemics.
lpf452 (2025-04-06 07:55:52+00:00): Your suggestion looks good. I will fix this later using the Java OpenStreetMap editor on Arch Linux.
Thank you very much for your suggestion! I'll send you the changeset ID when I'm done editing.
lpf452 (2025-04-06 17:55:25+00:00): Fixed: Changeset #164603080 (used Vespucci because included other edits)
NeisReview (2025-03-29 21:52:03+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164241290
CrisR87 (2025-03-29 09:16:37+00:00): https://www.ovb-online.de/muehldorf/muehldorf/umbau-und-erweiterung-des-kindergarten-heldenstein-ein-ort-wo-kinder-gluecklich-sind-91004902.html
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-29 09:20:54+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12709493562

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2025-03-29 20:35:20+00:00): Moin chris66,

ich hätte ein paar Anmerkungen:

- Der Kinderhort in einem 6-stöckigen Gebäude sollte besser als node erfasst werden, da er sicher nicht das ganze Gebäude belegt und so die Daten sauberer erfasst werden können.

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12709514322 ist das wirklich der Name? Falls ja, bitte eine note, die andere Mapper davon abhält den name in description zu schieben

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12709514323 für Geschäfte, die auch Postdienstleistungen anbieten haben wir den tag post_office=post_partner. Details liefert das Wiki

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164240439
chris66 (2025-03-29 20:37:45+00:00): Danke für die Optimierungshinweise, werde ich prüfen. 
Schönen Sonntach :)
pitfire (2025-04-04 10:44:45+00:00): Hi Cdh2016,

bitte keine Gebäude einfach nur löschen. Dafür gibt es den Schlüssel-Präfix-DE:Key:demolished:*
Namensraum für Objekte, die vollständig zurückgebaut wurden.

Dieser Namensraum-Schlüssel kann  nützlich sein, um z.B. zu verhindern, dass andere Kartierer ein kürzlich entferntes Objekt oder Merkmal wieder in die Karte eintragen, da es noch längere Zeit auf Luftbildern dargestellt ist. (Alternativ kann eine entsprechende Information an andere Kartierer auch über den Schlüssel note=* eingetragen werden.

VG pitfire
Frans S (2025-03-29 11:42:25+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please square the rectangular buildings. 
Don't you use the building plugin ? With that tool you create nice rectangular buildings.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-29 09:30:49+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12709493562

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1372614706

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
dadavid (2025-05-03 20:19:32+00:00): Hi, 

die width von 1.4 Metern hier [1] kommt mir etwas kompakt vor, meintest du den Gehweg? :) Habs mal entfernt, da kann ja sonst kein Auto mehr durch. 

Viele Grüße und weiterhin viel Spass beim Mappen :) 

David

[1] osm.org/way/425489133
Michaall99 (2025-03-29 14:57:38+00:00): Dzień dobry, czy ulica Gajowa na pewno znajduje się w strefie zamieszkania? Rzadko się zdarza, aby przy drodze zaledwie z jednym domem ustanowiono taką strefę. Początek strefy zamieszkania oznacza znak D-40 - czy znajduje się on w tym miejscu? Proszę o informację.
icluf (2025-04-07 17:40:56+00:00): Bonjour, juste pour vous signaler, qu'une portion de la route de Castres est passée en "voie de service" suite à votre groupe de modifications, ce qui semble une erreur (mais je ne connais pas Albi, et consultait juste la carte dans cette zone). La portion en question : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121240891#map=17/43.902384/2.146969
Bien cordialement, icluf
NeisReview (2025-03-29 18:32:12+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164260890
StC (2025-03-29 10:48:42+00:00): Bonjour,

le modification sur les tags de la relation  https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16196518 n'est pas appropriée (suppression de type=route, modification de route=hiking). Je m'occupe de la correction.