piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-04-10 20:00:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13679870801 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Real estate agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
DCools (2026-04-14 07:16:10+00:00): Het Jan Ypermanpark is nog niet aangelegd, de voorziene paden bestaan (nog) niet.
NeisBot (2026-04-10 20:12:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13682204799 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Furniture store"

#MapWithoutSpam
sommallorqui (2026-04-10 20:13:23+00:00): Este barrio existe. No sé porque lo han eliminado sin razón.
NeisBot (2026-04-10 20:15:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13682569961 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
DCools (2026-04-14 07:15:54+00:00): Het Jan Ypermanpark is nog niet aangelegd, de voorziene paden bestaan (nog) niet.
Jakka (2026-04-14 07:22:01+00:00): Alles op proposed gezet. éénmaal uitgevoerd woord proposed eraf halen.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-16 13:10:51+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with explicit source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184181473

https://osm.org/changeset/184181473
NeisBot (2026-04-10 20:25:32+00:00): Hello Vittorio Colombo, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/13721889273

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181167187
MxxCon (2026-04-12 20:43:30+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete the primary "amenity=restaurant" tag from The Milton in this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181167338
gopinath16 (2026-04-14 02:32:49+00:00): I think I might have deleted that tag by mistake. Thanks for catching that :)
Glassman (2026-04-11 16:22:49+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline, then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181167481
silversurfer83 (2026-04-12 14:56:04+00:00): Moin :)

ein barrier=* benötigt immer einen gemeinsamen node mit dem betroffenen highway=* an dem alle relevanten barrier tags enthalten sind, da sonst keine Wirkung auf das Routing entfaltet wird.

Die Barriere in seiner Gänze zu erfassen ist in Ordnung. Der gemeinsame Node jedoch nötig.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181167489
Cowboy79 (2026-04-12 19:12:10+00:00): Danke, aber ich dachte, das hätte ich damit erledigt, indem ich den Zaun auf den Verbindungs-node zwischen den beiden Wegen gelegt hätte. Also muss man einen der highways kreuzen, um ihn fürs Routing zu "sperren"?
Es handelt sich dabei eigentlich nicht um einen Zaun im engeren Sinne, sondern einen hohen, breiten, langen Wall aus Zweigen, der offensichtlich von jemand offiziellem da hingebracht wurde. Weißt du, wie man das besser als als Holz-Zaun kartieren könnte?
BG
S
silversurfer83 (2026-04-12 19:20:38+00:00): Kann den Gedanken nachvollziehen. Funktioniert leider nicht.

Daher ist es wichtig, alle relevanten Daten auf jeden auf den gemeinsamen node zu mappen, auch wenn es dann Software gibt, die mosert, dass die Info doppel angelegt ist. Muss man dann ignorieren.

Nen besseren Wert für die Sperre kann ich dir grad nicht liefern. Entweder einfach barrier=yes oder lass es so. 

Wird vermutlich eine Vielzahl diverser barrier Werte geben, im Wiki ist aber nichts passendes dokumentiert. 

Sind das da auf den Halden MTB-Trails?
Cowboy79 (2026-04-12 19:46:55+00:00): OK, also ist es egal, ob der gemeinsame node auf einem Weg oder zwischen zwei Wegen ist. Das ist nicht sehr intuitiv, aber gut.
barrier=yes gefällt mir besser, weil es zwar weniger präzise, aber nicht falsch ist.
Der Weg, um den es hier geht, ist lediglich ein Trampelpfad. Vielleicht wurde er von MTBern genutzt und das ging dem Förster auf die Nerven.
Ein paar Meter weiter steht ja eine Information über einen MTB-Brammen-Trail. Davon ist mir aber nichts bekannt. Die übrigen Wege waren sowohl zu Fuß als auch per Fahrrad gut zu befahren.
Glassman (2026-04-11 16:24:04+00:00): I think you want the tag landuse=grass. Grasslands are large grass fields where wildlife graze.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181167902
NeisBot (2026-04-10 20:54:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13699474420 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Funeral home"

#MapWithoutSpam
MassCartog (2026-04-10 23:21:28+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. Please update inaccurate data instead of just removing it. Seems like some of these trails were more or less right, we try to update data not remove it. I updated the area to give you an Idea of what I mean. Thanks
NeisBot (2026-04-10 21:00:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/10031834914 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Pest control office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisBot (2026-04-10 21:12:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13701740750 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Grill restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisBot (2026-04-10 21:18:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13702422577 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Thrift store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisBot (2026-04-10 21:24:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13703664410 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Remodeling company"

#MapWithoutSpam
Crapphone (2026-04-10 21:28:34+00:00): They also have a walk up window for buying grilled products like tri-tip sandwiches, pastrami sandwiches, and sides like fries and onion rings.
kabelhaai (2026-04-12 11:07:12+00:00): Ter info: wegenwerken korter dan 3-6 maanden zijn niet de moeite om in osm te steken. Dit omdat de routeerders altijd bij het bijhouden van de databank achter staan. Vaak minstens een maand. 

Deze werken duren nog geen week. Dit heeft weinig zin in osm, omdat de databank die wordt gebruikt door applicaties amper real time data gebruikt.

Routers gaan over een maand of 2 nu deze route niet meer gebruiken ook al zijn de werken dan al lang gedaan. 
Een oplossing is de weg op highway te laten staan (geen construction) en vervolgens de access:conditional tags te gebruiken net zoals openingsuren.

Mvg
GR-menneke (2026-04-13 19:05:09+00:00): Dag kabelhaai,
Dank voor de toelichting en tip.
Handig om mee te nemen in de toekomst.
GRoetjes
NeisBot (2026-04-10 21:48:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13717038242 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
rarad74 (2026-04-11 06:02:52+00:00): Hi. Pleasu use MApbox imagery or at least ESRI standard. Bing are very old in bucharest ( over 10 years).
werbuli (2026-04-21 09:47:36+00:00): Du hast um Überprüfung gebeten:
1. Deine Relation besteht nur aus einem Mitglied - sie muss aber mind. 3 haben
Beschreibung siehe hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:restriction
2. Du hast die Relation als "from" an einem highway=footway (also ausschl. für Fußgänger) erfasst - sehr unwahrscheinlich, dass Fußgänger hier nur rechts abbiegen dürfen. Daneben unterstelle ich mal, dass vor dem Schuleingang außer vlt. Rasentraktoren kein öffentl. Verkehr zugelassen ist, der auf den Parkplatz fährt.
Daher würde ich hier keine restriction-Relation erfassen.
TornadoFang (2026-04-21 09:54:34+00:00): Da geht um Fahrzeuge
marczoutendijk (2026-04-11 18:03:15+00:00): You are using incompatible images for your changesets. Is there any reason for that?

Best regards  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
MxxCon (2026-04-11 02:27:47+00:00): Shouldn't have wasted your time fixing this seo spam😉
If they want to add stuff to OSM, force them to do it right or we'll forever be fixing it for them.
ChrissW-R1 (2026-04-11 20:51:24+00:00): No matter how stubborn we might be in these cases, these “SPAM” changesets will never stop. Therefore, it’s better to make use of this data than to keep it as junk in our database. The other option would be to delete the data, which wouldn’t help anyone either.

However, if this continues to concern you, you can contact the DWG at any time.
MxxCon (2026-04-11 20:58:00+00:00): If they are not punished to submit the correct data, we'll forever be fixing it🫤
ChrissW-R1 (2026-04-11 21:33:50+00:00): That may well be true, but it is not my job to punish someone; that is the responsibility of the Data Working Group (DWG).
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Ban_Policy

https://osm.org/changeset/133106398
Warin61 (2026-04-13 00:21:39+00:00): Platforms do not go at the end of a route. 
Platform is removed from route 8406939.
Warin61 (2026-04-13 00:25:41+00:00): And platform removed from route https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181170509
Warin61 (2026-04-14 23:46:35+00:00): Platforms removed from relation 16305117 - incorrect order.
pwbriggs (2026-04-16 00:23:25+00:00): Thanks!
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-08 16:22:24+00:00): where this import was discussed?

are you aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?
adaptive (2026-07-08 16:48:24+00:00): Wiki on the Volta Network is here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Volta_PT

public domain data
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-08 17:52:23+00:00): where this import was discussed with community?

Why this import introduced a new tagging? Have you discussed it before import?

Why amenity=vending_machine + vending=bottle_return was not used? Do you have plans to fix tagging?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-16 13:57:14+00:00): send PM reminder ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/messages/1365881 )
ghowen (2026-07-23 11:13:04+00:00): While I find the tagging more consistent than the vending_machine variant, I am a bit surprised by the authoritative tone of the wiki, which reads like commands on how to do this. Where does this supposed authority come from? And I second @Mateusz that this should have been discussed ahead of the import IMHO. Also the imports are just reverse geocoded addresses, so many of them are near the location of the machine but not at the location. I guess I appreciate the addition of the machines to OSM, which is helpful in Portugal, but I question the way it was done.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-23 13:50:56+00:00): > I am a bit surprised by the authoritative tone of the wiki, which reads like commands on how to do this

which page you refer here? Import/Guidelines or some tagging docs page?
ghowen (2026-07-23 14:00:54+00:00): > which page you refer here?Import/Guidelines or some tagging docs page?

osm.wiki/Volta_PT

Also just dumping something like this in thousands of nodes without prior discussion feels a bit off, but maybe it's just me:

"survey the station, remove FIXME only when the station is operational and update check_date"

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13720660756#map=19/37.025100/-7.837670
NeisBot (2026-04-10 23:15:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13722067827 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Internet provider office"
---
Por exemplo, uma versão mais neutra e factual do seu texto poderia ser: "escritório de provedor de internet"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
wireguy (2026-04-11 18:48:18+00:00): vdevir1,  welcome to osm.  A relation for Princeton u already exists, with more information.   Can you remove the one you created?   
Take a look at the existing one to compare and contrast.  Keep mapping!   There is lots of other things to map.  The pastry room on spring street changed over to a cafe, and there is a new Turkish restaurant on Nassau, and new Chinese next to the library, for example.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6365145
kitto33 (2026-04-18 11:49:43+00:00): Hi, the imagery you used is outdated and shows the old configuration. 
There is a newly-constructed lift_gate here, which you removed. Typically, when there are more features than what the imagery shows, development may have happened in this area and you should be suspicious of if the imagery is outdated.
kitto33 (2026-04-18 12:00:01+00:00): And more generally, because of the possibility of imagery being outdated, you should never remove objects based on aerial imagery alone. Please always use a more up-to-date source to remove objects in areas you are unfamiliar with
carlosguerrero_lyft (2026-04-21 18:51:17+00:00): Hello, kitto33, 
My name is Carlos, and I’m part of the OSM team here at Lyft. Thank you for reaching out regarding these edits.
Upon re-examination, I certainly agree with your observation. While we utilize the most recent aerial and street-level imagery available to us, these sources sometimes lack the immediate updates necessary to reflect newly constructed features.
We value your local expertise and will incorporate these details into our future updates.
Happy mapping, 
Carlos.
d_berger (2026-04-12 11:13:28+00:00): Setze dich bitte mit den Mappingregeln und dem im Wiki dokumentierten Tagging auseinander, bevor du irgendwelche Objekte veränderst. Insbesondere Änderungen von Schema A nach Schema B sind nicht erwünscht. Duplizieren von Flächenobjekten durch Punktobjekte ist fehlerhaftes Mapping. Deskriptive Namen sind Fehler. Trottoirs sind keine "Fussgängerzonen". Und irgendwelche iD-Warnungen einfach "wegzudrücken" ist nicht nur schlechter Mappingstil, sondern schlicht das Maskieren von potenziellen Fehlern.

Sauberes Mapping musst du dir "erarbeiten" indem du (a) die Dokumentation liest und (b) die lokalen Mappingusanzen lernst. Einfach im gameifizerten iD herumdrücken ist ein Unding.

Aufgrund der schieren Masse an fehlerhaften Änderungen werde ich das komplette Changeset zurücksetzen. Danke für die Kenntnisnahme.
i2004 (2026-04-11 01:44:40+00:00): me ayudarias porfa con el 59 la lucila x autopista
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-11 04:43:16+00:00): Hi sommallorqui, welcome to OSM.

Could you share more context or a source for adding "Sometimes" as the name of this place=neighbourhood feature? "Sometimes" does not look like a typical neighbourhood name in this context, so a reference would help verify whether this is the correct and locally used name.

Your mentioned link does not work.

Thanks.
sommallorqui (2026-04-11 11:19:37+00:00): Aqui tambien se puede observar: https://ideib.caib.es/visor/
felipeeugenio (2026-04-11 14:56:49+00:00): Esta edicion está buena...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181172540
Comino (2026-04-11 07:58:43+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes".

The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NOT accepted.
Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Cryptocurrencies_with_payment_tag and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:*#Cryptocurrencies

I did remove that tag and corrected the companyname.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
ColbyTheWorldTraveler (2026-04-20 16:49:01+00:00): When making buildings, you can press 'Q' to square the shape, which looks significantly better. You can also select the specific type of building, such as "Bank" and "Funeral Home" on the editor. Looks good otherwise! Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181173174
❤️‍🔥 (2026-06-21 07:57:06+00:00): hi, please don't use alpine_hut in auckland. it never snows in auckland  so these are definitely not tourism=alpine_hut 😆 maybe  "hostel" or "motel" would be more appropriate?
felipeeugenio (2026-04-11 13:54:13+00:00): Hola. por favor no unir los cruces a las señalizaciones (ceda el paso)

Esos por lo general van antes del cruce.
saludos
c4rlo (2026-05-27 01:32:22+00:00): Hello! What research was this fence feature used for? It does not appear to correspond to any physical feature.
Supaplex (2026-04-11 07:16:50+00:00): 請用多重多邊形繪製跑道，而非刪除原跑道重新繪製
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181173561
ieguy3 (2026-04-11 03:33:28+00:00): washington is going to curve up. the eventual plan is to connect washington with inland valley drive
https://www.wildomar.gov/DocumentCenter/View/2746/Wildomar-General-Plan-Document-Adopted-12-9-24
Supaplex (2026-04-11 07:16:23+00:00): 請用多重多邊形繪製跑道，而非刪除原跑道重新繪製
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181173676
Supaplex (2026-04-11 07:16:44+00:00): 請用多重多邊形繪製跑道，而非刪除原跑道重新繪製
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181173676
jtracey (2026-04-11 03:50:09+00:00): Resolves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5244590
jtracey (2026-04-11 04:03:39+00:00): Resolves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5244591
Resolves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5244592
guillemmal (2026-04-11 21:13:53+00:00): Estimado, las calles en esta zona tenian la alineación con ortofotos, procedo a revertir el cambio. Cualquier duda no dudes en contactar a la comunidad local por telegram!

Saludos!
Enock4seth (2026-04-11 12:55:05+00:00): Hi ADDOMAN and welcome to OpenStreetMap,
Kindly use title case for names instead of ALL CAPS, The Church of Pentecost instead of THE CHURCH OF PENTECOST
formfeed (2026-04-12 18:53:44+00:00): For Beaver Creek Reserve, I added some trails to the North of County Rd K. 
Problems:  
With different zoom levels  parts of the trails disappear, others reappear.
Most of the trails should be loops, connected to other trails
Where did I go wrong?
Wrong tags? not connected?
Maybe someone with more experience can see the mistake.
guillemmal (2026-04-11 21:16:29+00:00): Estimado, las calles en esta zona tenian la alineación con ortofotos, procedo a revertir el cambio. Cualquier duda no dudes en contactar a la comunidad local por telegram!

Saludos!
guillemmal (2026-04-11 21:18:15+00:00): Estimado, las calles en esta zona tenian la alineación con ortofotos, procedo a revertir el cambio. Cualquier duda no dudes en contactar a la comunidad local por telegram!

Saludos!
NeisBot (2026-04-13 13:03:25+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for contributing!

I noticed that one node was moved quite a long distance. This can happen when a node is accidentally snapped to the wrong geometry or unintentionally moved during editing.

⚠️️ Problematic element:
https://osm.org/node/10227000480 v2

Would you mind taking another look?

#LongDistanceMove
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181174474
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-13 14:02:57+00:00): Revised by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182504840
Enock4seth (2026-04-11 12:59:57+00:00): Hi  ADDOMAN, I see you have added multiple nodes without any physical tags (i.e. is this a tree, street light, etc on the ground) and names ( e.g. ABC Residence, etc), these looks like private information, can you clarify.

The buildings footprints are better mapped as polygons/areas.