piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck (2025-03-19 09:38:00+00:00): Dear Tung130204, in this changeset you have deleted a number of buildings that clearly exist according to aerial imagery, and you have not given a good reason for this. The changeset comment field is a chance for you to explain why you made a certain edit; instead you just wrote "Tùng" which does not explain anything.

It also looks as if you might be adding the names of private individuals to buildings in OpenStreetMap. If this is the case, please stop - and delete the names you have already added. We do not record personal information in OSM.
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
NeisReview (2025-03-19 17:31:54+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
NeisReview (2025-03-28 20:29:58+00:00): #farmland #game
tastrax (2025-03-22 10:08:00+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
Langlaeufer (2025-03-21 07:14:56+00:00): Die Gebäude sind doch noch in Bau, oder?
SebastianRobra (2025-03-21 07:21:23+00:00): Das Parkhaus ist fertig, die PFSH ist noch im Rohbau.
Langlaeufer (2025-03-21 07:41:00+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung. Ich hab das Tagging angepasst
Langlaeufer (2025-03-21 07:42:52+00:00): Pflegefachschule kann man als Berufsschule einordnen, oder?
NeisReview (2025-03-19 17:31:46+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
NeisReview (2025-03-28 20:29:39+00:00): #farmland #game ?
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:24:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:26:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
NeisBot (2025-03-19 09:54:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 02:29:27+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164658060
enzo_immergis (2025-08-05 10:39:09+00:00): Bonjour chrizy,
Les travaux sur la voie verte sont-ils finis ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208558031

D'ailleurs j'imagine qu'elle ne sera pas à sens unique ?
J'ai supprimé oneway:bicycle=yes.

Bonne journée,
Enzo
chrizy (2025-08-06 08:33:39+00:00): Bonjour Enzo,
Terminée officiellement je me sais pas mais déjà utilisée tous les jours oui par plusieurs personnes oui.
"Oneway..." était un ancien attribut que j'ai oublié de supprimer en effet, merci.
Bonne journée également,
Christophe
Rom1 (2025-03-20 07:48:22+00:00): Bonjour, est-ce qu'il y a une signalisation sur place qui interdit le passage à autre chose qu'un piéton ? Merci
BenieB (2025-03-20 08:30:07+00:00): Bonjour, pas de signalisation spécifique non, mais je me suis référé à la documentation pour faire cette modification. Il s'agit de chemins très étroits ou il n'est pas aisé de faire du vélo sans poser pied à terre. Impossible de se croiser notamment
Rom1 (2025-03-20 09:14:43+00:00): Ok ça peut se discuter mais il n'y a pas vraiment d'enjeu pour ces chemins qui ne servent qu'à desservir quelques habitations. Merci :)
BenieB (2025-03-20 09:36:14+00:00): On est d'accord sur l'enjeu restreint. J'ai aussi fait ces rectifications pour tester l'ergonomie du module de modification d'OSM. Je débute mais j'aime la carto et je connais plutôt bien Nancy
Rom1 (2025-03-20 09:41:53+00:00): Sais-tu qu'il y a un groupe local qui se réunit tous les 4ème mercredi du mois à Vandoeuvre ? https://www.openstreetmap.fr/groupe-local-nancy/ Si tu es disponible, n'hésite pas à passer...
BenieB (2025-03-20 11:30:34+00:00): Merci pour l'info, difficile pour moi de me rendre disponible mais c'est toujours intéressant de le savoir
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
silversurfer83 (2025-03-20 16:23:17+00:00): Hi Gerry,

Du hast hier explizit darum gebeten, dass sich das jemand ansieht.

Ich hab keine Ahnung, was du angeklickt hast, aber du der Straße 10 Stützpunkte entnommen und damit den Verlauf begradigt, was der Realität nicht entspricht. Weißt du, was du hier gemacht hast, dass es dazu kam?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163809780
Gerry2011 (2025-03-20 19:06:51+00:00): Ich habe immer nur mit dem Tool zwei Punkte markiert .auf dieser Strecke gibt es keine Geschwindigkeits Einschränkungen.Es sind aber 50kmh und 70 kmh Beschränkungen verzeichnet. So gar eine 30 kmh mitten im Wald. Nur diese beschränkungen wurden markiert und von 30,50,70 auf 100kmh gesetzt
silversurfer83 (2025-03-20 20:36:24+00:00): Ok. Kann mir weiter nicht genau erklären, was da passiert ist, nur die maxspeed Werte hast du nicht erwischt.

Da kannst du gerne nochmal ran.

(Ich kann mir vorstellen, dass es hier mal ne Baustelle gab und deshalb noch so komische Werte da stehen)
eggie (2025-03-19 10:46:38+00:00): Hi George  No need to tag bicycle=yes on roads. That's default.
What is the problem here? 
Greetz,
eggie
a_goat (2025-03-19 11:30:21+00:00): Hi eggie! Thanks for the question, I am still quite new so reviews like this help me a lot.
The issue was that Organic Maps was not using these segments in biking directions, instead preferring to use the highway. This was not the case for segment 7039230 where it correctly identified the cycle path and preferred it. I reasoned that explicitly marking the ways as traversable by bike would help the navigator, but I have yet to test. You are right about the defaults, though, and it was an oversight on my part not to think about that beforehand.
eggie (2025-03-19 12:11:21+00:00): Hi George,

Look here for the routing with routing engine OSRM
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bicycle&route=52.34385%2C5.00374%3B52.34146%2C5.0215#map=16/52.34271/5.01264&layers=N

No problem.

At the moment I noticed there is an issue with Valhalla en GraphHopper.
Perhaps that is the case? 

I don't no which router is in use by Organic?

The problem is not caused by tags in OSM database.

Greetz,
eggie
NeisReview (2025-03-19 17:32:58+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
kamasytrix (2025-03-19 12:04:20+00:00): Якщо знаєте номера квартир в під'їзді, можна додати тег addr:flats=1-36 ,  де 1-36 квартири в цьому під'їзді
NeisBot (2025-03-19 10:21:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
NeisReview (2025-03-28 19:42:38+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164223664
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:24:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
WoSoe (2025-03-20 05:23:40+00:00): Kannst du die Umbenennung belegen?
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frauentor_(N%C3%BCrnberg)
Danke und Gruß
GA_Kevin (2025-03-20 13:35:16+00:00): Hi Lacey! Thanks for adding your business to OpenStreetMap! I have been updating as much as I can around Valdosta. I updated your listing to fix some syntax we use on OSM and add some info from your sites contact page. (Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163863472)

If you know of any other businesses in town that want to get added but dont want to use OSM proper, you can always point people to https://www.onosm.org/ and it will create a note for one of the editors to add :)

Youve gone above and beyond by adding info yourself, thank you again! Have a great day!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 02:18:50+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165093649
Dawid2849 (2025-05-06 11:10:20+00:00): Witam. Czemu w tej edycji stary wjazd do Grębowa został podniesiony do drogi residential? Do jakich zabudowań ta droga prowadzi?
Dawid2849 (2025-05-06 11:26:18+00:00): Ta droga jest zdecydowanie drogą polną. W 2010 (po wybudowaniu obwodnicy) wjazd do Grębowa został odcięty i ze względu na brak zabudowań droga stanowi jedynie dojazd do łąk i pól w jej pobliżu. Zastosowanie track w tym miejscu było dyskutowane tutaj (link do tej dyskusji był zresztą w znaczniku note na drodze): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/co-to-jest-highway-track/87408/32

"The tag highway=track is used for minor land-access roads that are not considered part of the general-purpose road network. Track roads are mostly used for agriculture, forestry, outdoor recreation, and similar activities on open land." - To opis highway=track z OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack), moim zdaniem to jest idealny opis tej drogi. Niżej są też zdjęcia przedstawiające przypadki kiedy stosować track, a kiedy nie. Track to nie są wyłącznie drogi gruntowe, tak samo jak nie każda droga gruntowa jest track.
kapazao (2025-03-19 10:57:44+00:00): Hola, por favor comenta correctamente los conjuntos de cambios para que los demás usuarios sepan lo que has editado.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas_en_Espa%C3%B1a#Changesets_o_conjunto_de_cambios

Un saludo
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 00:25:27+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164656521
marauder156 (2025-03-20 15:23:15+00:00): A42 - Instandsetzung des Bauwerks Rhein-Herne-Kanal - AlD 2969
Zeitraum dieser Bauphase:
Beginn: 11.12.23 um 03:00 Uhr
Ende: 31.03.26 um 12:00 Uhr
(Ende der Gesamtmaßnahme: 31.03.26)

Auffahrt auf die A42: AS Bottrop-Süd (aus Richtung Oberhausen Neue Mitte)

Länge: konnte nicht ermittelt werden

A42 - Instandsetzung des Bauwerks Rhein-Herne-Kanal - AlD 2969
Syl (2025-03-23 09:51:48+00:00): Bonjour, l'ajout de l'attribut "level" sur un bâtiment ne veut rien dire. Qu'est-ce que vous avez voulu indiquer ?
flohoff (2025-03-19 18:46:47+00:00): Moin,
der changeset hatte weitreichende Routingänderungen zur folge.

Bis wann gilt denn die Sperrung/Baustelle?

Flo
marauder156 (2025-03-20 15:21:59+00:00): Hi Flo,

das ist ziemlich langfristig:

A42 - Instandsetzung des Bauwerks Rhein-Herne-Kanal - AlD 2969
Zeitraum dieser Bauphase:
Beginn: 11.12.23 um 03:00 Uhr
Ende: 31.03.26 um 20:00 Uhr
(Ende der Gesamtmaßnahme: 31.03.26)

Auffahrt auf die A42: AK Essen-Nord (aus Richtung Essen-Altenessen)

Länge: konnte nicht ermittelt werden

A42 - Instandsetzung des Bauwerks Rhein-Herne-Kanal - AlD 2969
NeisBot (2025-03-19 11:03:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-03-28 19:41:44+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164223616
Константин Гам (2025-03-20 09:48:46+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Пожалуйста не рисуйте по любым спутниковым снимкам в данной местности, особенно новые обьекты.
В данной местности произошёл ряд изменений, которых нет на них. Вы вносите не актуальные и ошибочные данные.

Спасибо за понимание
Ал Мок (2025-03-20 10:08:23+00:00): Добрый день. Что значит по любым? По актуальным.Что неправильно?
Константин Гам (2025-03-20 13:10:58+00:00): По любым это всмысле Mapbox, Esri, Bing... Неправильно слишком многое. Пришлось переделывать за вами.
Сегодня вечером заеду на фото-контроль данного квартала.
Он у меня раз в 3 недели в списке обьезда и осмотра. И Кокколевская в постоянном мониторинге. Достаточно посмотреть в список редакторов данной местности.
Алекс Мок (2025-03-20 13:14:05+00:00): Проезд по Кокколевской есть
Алекс Мок (2025-03-20 13:15:28+00:00): Вы же здания не отриовали,которые строятся? А они там уже почти год стоят.
Константин Гам (2025-03-20 13:33:56+00:00): Вечером заеду, исправлю по факту. Здания стоят и стройка идёт. Есть фото двух недельной давности.
Я всю территорию по периметру с трех сторон обьехал.
Константин Гам (2025-03-20 13:38:00+00:00): Откройте вселенскую тайну что за снимки мапбокс такие.
В josm по данному адресу: tms[22]:https://{switch:a,b,c,d}.tiles.mapbox.com/v4/mapbox.satellite/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.jpg?access_token={apikey} снимки вообще тухлые лет на 5+
Алекс Мок (2025-03-20 13:38:48+00:00): Ну я ж как то отрисовал)
Константин Гам (2025-03-20 13:38:56+00:00): В редакторе ID тоже. Если в официальных редакторах OSM этого нет, какая-то магия подземная прям...
Константин Гам (2025-03-20 13:39:35+00:00): Так может вы обрисовываете не mapbox, а google?
Укажите нормально источник снимков.
Константин Гам (2025-03-20 13:40:12+00:00): Или вы путаете mapbox и Esri?
Алекс Мок (2025-03-20 13:40:57+00:00): Не буду врать м.б. Esri. Сейчас не помню.
Константин Гам (2025-03-20 14:30:06+00:00): Я опираюсь на source в ваших пакетах правок.

Esri, точно знаю что актуален но не весь и по нему ктото умудрился стереть фактическое состояние Кокколевской на изгибе к Пулковскому... но кто не разбирался, может и не вы.
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
b-jazz (2025-03-20 17:01:38+00:00): Thanks for joining the fairways and greens. Much appreciated.
streckenkundler (2025-03-20 21:26:06+00:00): There are problems with the house number here. 

The official data call house number 1
Kaufland calls house number 2

What is correct? I have no idea!

Here in the federal state of Brandenburg, we are free to use official data for OSM. We also have the opportunity to report any errors. This is called Geomaerker here. https://geobasis-bb.de/lgb/de/geodaten/portale-anwendungen/geomaerker/geomaerker-anleitung/#
That's where I reported the address error.

See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4673481

I'm watching that!

More preferably in German.

...translated with DeepL

strekenkundler
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
gscholz (2025-03-26 08:36:20+00:00): Hi Gleb_Artyomenko,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-6.19978&lat=36.48418&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=163812137

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routign software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Gleb_Artyomenko (2025-03-26 12:41:05+00:00): Hello, gscholz, thanks for the feedback! This situation occurred due to the fact that the same edit was made with a difference of 4 hours: first my edit was made, and after a while - by another mapper "jeslop" with the change "163823190" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163823190#map=17/36.476343/-6.201111). Since the edit of another mapper has additional data on the description of the road and the relation, I see it more relevant to remove my edit in this situation, the case will be fixed. Thank you for paying attention to this issue! Best regards, Gleb
Константин Гам (2025-03-20 11:14:30+00:00): УБЕДИТЕЛЬНАЯ ПРОСЬБА не вносить не существующие ещё дороги без параметров access=no или construction! Вы ломаете навигацию в данном районе внося новые узлы и линии в граф, не существующих в реальности!
Алекс Мок (2025-03-20 11:38:47+00:00): В чем проблема? Там можно проехать. Пользуетесь не только вы ,а другие участники движения( пример-строители)
Константин Гам (2025-03-20 13:08:50+00:00): Прекрасно! Я же не против факта внесения этих проездов! НО ВНОСЯ!!! вносите access ! Там чётко видно даже по долбанному Esri - КПП и шлагбаум на вьезде. Заехать туда без пропуска не получится.
ВОТ В ЧЁМ ПРОБЛЕМА
GerdP (2025-11-18 09:32:31+00:00): Moin!
Wie sicher bist Du mit diesem Wasserweg? https://www.osm.org/way/1369080592
Ich habe gerade hier https://www.osm.org/way/1451587760 die Bäke eingezeichnet und würde eher vermuten, dass der Abzweig eher bei diesem Knoten https://www.osm.org/node/13313200869  liegt.
_zalle_ (2025-11-18 10:21:32+00:00): Moin Gerd!
Da liegst du sicherlich richtig, mit DOP20 ist das auch klar zu sehen. Als ich vor einigen Monaten die Verbindung der beiden Äste der Bäke eingezeichnet habe, war das einerseits nur Beifang von Flächenaufteilungen, andererseits in Bing Bildern schwerer zu erkennen.
GerdP (2025-11-18 13:36:48+00:00): Ich würde jetzt einfach die beiden Wege https://www.osm.org/way/97828718
https://www.osm.org/way/1369080592
löschen. OK?
_zalle_ (2025-11-18 20:27:12+00:00): erledigt!
NeisReview (2025-03-20 07:56:06+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges #Test

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
NeisRevert (2025-03-21 20:56:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163924285 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove testdata
Константин Гам (2025-03-20 11:19:47+00:00): Вот этот полигон вы срисовали с неактуального спутника?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1347042216

Смотрите в данные и даты когда они были внесены. Я лично собирал геометрии на местности. СПУТНИК отстаёт на ГОД, а ситуация меняется ежедневно! Пожалуйста, проверяйте то что делаете.
Ал Мок (2025-03-20 11:29:50+00:00): С какого неактуального? MAPBOX. Актуальный
Ал Мок (2025-03-20 11:30:34+00:00): На неактуальных нет Пулковского плюс
Константин Гам (2025-03-20 13:11:58+00:00): Актуальных снимков не существует как факта, кроме как у военных. Обычные снимки минимум на год отстают в 99% случаев.
Алекс Мок (2025-03-20 13:17:20+00:00): Да год назад там еще зданий не было,а сейчас на снимке здания почти закончены. Вы о чем? Посмотрите снимки и дату релиза
Алекс Мок (2025-03-20 13:18:51+00:00): Я тоже отслеживаю снимки. Не нужно думать что все вокруг тупые. Проедьте -посмотрите. Что спорить?
Алекс Мок (2025-03-20 13:20:16+00:00): Шлагбаум необязательно ставить . На стройку просто так никто не поедет.
Константин Гам (2025-03-20 13:32:16+00:00): Главное правило ОСМ забыли? ToG.

Шлагбаум ставить как раз таки обязательно, ибо в ином случае навигатор спокойно ведёт туда. Ещё и без access корректных.
Рисовать сеть дорог с открытым доступом через стройки, ну как-то непрофессионально. Полигоны не останавливают навигаторы, тем более, что дорога за территорией стройки напрямую идёт, хоть и сугубо для строительной техники.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 02:29:28+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164658060
tastrax (2025-03-22 09:56:34+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
NeisReview (2025-03-19 17:43:10+00:00): #DataImport

Hi, welcome to OSM!

With this changeset, you've added a significant number of features that appear to share similarities in their tags. Could you please let us know more about the source of your mapping activity? Is this a data import?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks!