piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
R3gi (2023-10-21 10:58:24+00:00): Hopefully I have resolved the issue by changing the tagging to general tourism:attraction.

Please feel free to improve the tagging if you find even more suitable tags.

Since the location is recognized and visited by tourists, it should be definitely tagged somehow. (Just like navigation directions, local names, inherited speed limits etc. which have no physical markings, but still have a proper place in the DB as indeed valuable properties.)

Thank you!
SuborbitalPigeon (2023-10-21 11:35:43+00:00): Sounds fair, thanks
mtmail (2024-02-07 13:17:21+00:00): For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/973025001 what does boundary=Emergency mean? It looks like the boundary of a neighborhood or suburb?
user_18913526 (2024-02-07 13:29:46+00:00): I am not the person who entered the tag "boundary=Emergency". Please contact the correct person for that. You can find it in the changelog history.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-26 19:10:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11220937307
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1082388791

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MxxCon (2023-09-27 03:14:19+00:00): Hello.
Please do use meaningful changeset comments - “h” does not help other mappers understand what you are doing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141788999
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-26 19:50:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11221066655
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456592564

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
augil (2023-09-26 20:29:57+00:00): why do you think it's useless?
user_177389 (2023-09-27 04:23:01+00:00): Nowhere in Europe do the postal_code boundaries have a label. In France, however, there are a few exceptions with centre/section nodes. We don't want to start ruining the relations, which are difficult to maintain anyway, with lots of additional members.
Allison P (2023-09-30 06:27:46+00:00): amenity=self_storage is not recognized by most data consumers. Better to tag the area or the office as shop=storage_rental and just tag building=warehouse on the buildings
Jarrardi (2023-10-03 05:08:03+00:00): Thanks tons!
jbcharron (2023-09-30 10:13:10+00:00): Salut,
pour info les numéros de téléphone doivent être au format +33 3 29 29 29 29 ou +33329292929 -> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:phone
Bonne journée :)
Cartyl (2023-09-30 11:48:19+00:00): Salut,
Merci pour ta vigilance, c'est corrigé.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141947705
Bonne journée également :)
moje_konto (2023-09-26 23:39:12+00:00): www.openstreetmap.org/way/977054468/history
Czemu usunąłeś szlaban? Na fotomapie jest.
moje_konto (2023-09-28 22:23:27+00:00): Przywróciłem szlaban, bo brak źródła o usunięciu.

Zgodnie z aktualną fotomapą jest, choć kilka metrów dalej, niedokładnej pozycji się nie usuwa - tylko poprawia.
Feskil (2023-09-29 12:05:41+00:00): Szlaban usunięty przez przypadek. Dziękuję za pomoc.
umapjpnic793 (2023-09-27 13:12:24+00:00): Fumiyo MURAYAMAさん、大丈夫、素晴らしい出典付きでよく出来てます。
貢献ありがとうございました。
Quimby5 (2023-09-26 20:38:41+00:00): JOSM glitch - uploaded changeset before I could comment?! 
Updated a few tracks near Cody-Cedar FSR.  Source from GPS tracks
NieWnen (2023-09-26 22:48:25+00:00): Do not change boundaries if you don't know what are you doing. It's not an error. It doesn't have to be a straight line.
Reverted (141794232)
aceman444 (2025-03-02 16:52:49+00:00): Zdravim, preco su hranice farnosti vlozene ako 'inner' cleny v tejto relacii? To mi nejako nedava zmysel. Uz su tam spravne ako clenovia 'subarea'.
A akoze zdroj 'survey'? To ste tie hranice presli osobne?
Growebis (2023-09-28 18:05:25+00:00): Hi, I'm just wondering but where did you get the information from? Because the point has addr:street and addr:postalcode filled. If you are copying from google maps then that is a BIG no no since you aren't allowed to copy data from google under their proprietary license.
Jarek 🚲 (2023-10-08 19:51:09+00:00): Hello,

You removed the crossing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1202215714/history only a month after I mapped it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140394499 - as that changeset message said, I personally surveyed the intersection as having crossings both sides. Could you please undelete the crossing?

Thanks,
--Jarek
Jarek 🚲 (2023-10-30 02:03:11+00:00): Hello,

I have now restored the crossing you have erroneously deleted with changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143339479.

Sincerely,
--Jarek
VLD062 (2023-10-30 20:31:44+00:00): Jarek Piórkowski, I apologize for misinterpreting this feature edit. I made my edits based on aerial imagery and missed your changeset comment. Thank you for restoring the correct changeset. 

Sincerely,
Jesspher
Marek-M (2023-09-27 07:11:22+00:00): Testowałeś max. długość komentarza? Jaki wynik pomiaru? :) Wg statystyk wychodzi:
Znaki: 194 999
Znaki bez spacji: 156 000
Wyrazy: 39 000
NorthCrab (2023-09-27 07:38:26+00:00): Tak bo nie chciało mi się wierzyć za bardzo :P Po prostu nie ma limitu.
Aleks-Berlin (2023-09-27 07:54:52+00:00): Hi kosmer,
please write wikipedia=en:Abcd, not http... , see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Examples
Thanks, Alex
citrula (2023-09-26 21:40:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I'm not sure if the sandee.com link is appropriate for the website tag. The website tag is meant to be used for the official website of the feature, which sandee.com is not. You can read more about the tag here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website
Happy to answer any questions you have !
muchichka_s (2023-10-10 15:43:24+00:00): Музична школа, художня школа - не є школою. Не треба гнатися за красивою картинкою
MxxCon (2023-09-27 03:17:56+00:00): Hello.
You updated Investors Bank into Citizens Bank, but kept the same phone number. Is that accurate?
Similar with the 2 medical offices, their names changes but phone numbers remained the same?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141792732
incidentallypluto (2023-09-27 13:48:44+00:00): MxxCon - I didn't go through the extra steps of verifying the phone numbers. Didn't want to delete them from the listings in case they were still accurate. For the medical offices, I doubt they changed, but again am not 100% sure.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141792732
MxxCon (2023-09-29 01:23:15+00:00): Most of the time if businesses change, they change phone numbers. Leaving old phone numbers, especially for medical offices is potentially dangerous.
traveleditor (2023-09-27 11:55:05+00:00): Ah, sorry for that. I usually don't connect landuse to roads, but I thought it would be acceptable when it comes to residential quarters. Thanks for fixing this up
JLPS (2023-09-26 21:37:14+00:00): *gespecificeerd
Jakka (2023-09-27 08:24:51+00:00): "Kan de dataset van het 'punt' Groepspraktijk Hal overgenomen worden naar de contouren van dit gebouw aub?"
Algemeen. Niet zo'n voorstander van ganse gebouw... als praktijk te benoemen. Vermoed dat van kelder tot zolder het gebouw niet als dus danig gebruikt wordt. Best op vorm gebouw enkel wat met de constructie gebouw hoort hoogte soort dak aantal verdiepingen... Klasseert gebouw enz.... adres .... deze gegeven veranderen zelden Wat erin gebeurt zal sneller kunnen wijzigen. Maar je mag ook niet dubbel coderen op gebouw en nog eens op punt ... mvg
JLPS (2023-09-27 08:47:54+00:00): Het volledige gebouw wordt gebruikt voor medische doeleinden. Bedankt voor de toelichting, ik zal de eigenschappen in het 'punt' laten, het gebouw is eigenlijk ondergeschikt. Thx
Starawiwi (2023-09-27 16:09:00+00:00): Hallo,
kann es sein, dass Sie versehentlich das gesamte Natura 2000 - FFH-Gebiet "Ems" im Emsland gelöscht haben?
Falls dem so sein sollte, könnten Sie dies wieder herstellen bzw. Ihre Bearbeitung rückgängig machen?

Viele Grüße aus dem Emsland!
Niiepce (2023-09-27 17:22:44+00:00): Hallo Starawiwi,
Ich habe neben den kleinen geometrischen Änderungen im Süden auch den Tag leisure=nature_reserve entfernt, da dieser nur für NSG verwendet wird (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dnature_reserve#Verwendung_in_Deutschland). Deshalb ist das Gebiet leider nun nicht mehr in der Standart Kartenebene von OSM sichtbar, weil bei diesem Renderer die Entscheidung getroffen wurde nur alles was unter protect_class 1 bis 6 (NSG, LSG, Nationalparks, ...) fällt zu rendern. Andere Renderer rendern auch FFH-Gebiete (siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141793439#map=12/52.7138/7.2740&layers=Y)
Gelöscht ist das Gebiet also nicht.

Grüße Niiepce
Minh Nguyen (2023-10-16 22:18:02+00:00): Hi, the Route Number field (ref key) is only for signposted route numbers. The route numbers you added were already present, but in the unsigned_ref key so that they wouldn’t confuse motorists who are looking at signs on the ground.
Minh Nguyen (2023-10-16 22:19:05+00:00): These refs are unsignposted and were already in unsigned_ref.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142685666
bxl-forever (2023-09-26 22:25:38+00:00): Hello,

The country code is not "missing".
It is just not needed.  That is the primary reason why we never fill it in Belgium.  Geoqueries can easily identify the country where a POI is located.  There are very few places in the world where this tag is required.

Same goes for city names and postcodes, there is no need to repeat those values on every address or every point of interest.

(Example here for another set of changeset of yours: every object within this territory is automatically recognized as located in Isnes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3521530 ; that is the advantage of a geographical database; it also preserves against typos because people occasionally make mistakes when filling postcodes or city names.)

Happy mapping.
fititnt (2023-12-13 23:12:21+00:00): Olá Melissa-11112. Seja bem vinda ao OpenStreetMap! Pode me confirmar se você estava presencialmente nesta cidade, ou se esteve nela e se lembra do que havia nessas ruas? Se a resposta é não, poderia por favor explicar como você descobriu as informações adicionadas?

A pergunta é porque adições feitas por você não são possíveis de serem feitas usando apenas imagem aérea do Bing Maps Aerial.

E os nomes que adicionou parecem ser exatamente o que é usado no Google Maps, inclusive em <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1211122879#map=18/-29.23974/-51.86509> a grafia de " VIDA Centro Veterinariox" (....) com "VIDA" em caixa alta (algo que apenas Google Maps tem), enquanto o usado no site e nas redes sociais é "Vida Centro Veterinário". Embora seja menos óbvio, outros elementos também têm nomes iguais ao Google Maps 
- "Casa velha restaurante" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1211122878#map=19/-29.23955/-51.86500
- (outro changeset seu) "Desco Super & Atacado"  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1211095951/history#map=17/-29.23487/-51.88333
wireguy (2023-09-26 22:32:08+00:00): Hi Dan, welcome to osm!   Take a look at the crossing node you updated, looks like you dragged it into the road.  Also, you have a fuel within a fuel, and that outer area is glued to service roads.   Needs some cleaning up.   Keep mapping, and if you have q's, just ask.
bxl-forever (2023-09-26 22:59:18+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue.

D’après un autre utilisateur, ce passage à niveau a été supprimé définitivement il y a plusieurs mois, voir version précédente de l’objet.


Version #6
« Le passage à niveau a été supprimé par la SNCB, il n'est plus du tout possible de traverser les voies à cet endroit »
Edited 4 months ago by JChr


Quelle est la situation exacte, svp ?  La fermeture était uniquement temporaire et vous avez vu le nouveau passage ?  Ou est-ce juste un travail sur photos aériennes ?
Merci.
Zeruman (2023-09-27 05:30:06+00:00): Bonjour, je confirme que le passage à niveau est toujours présent, fonctionnel et franchissable pour l’ensemble des utilisateurs. J’habite le quartier.
Il y a effectivement eu il y a quelques mois des profonds travaux de réflection du passage à niveau qui ont provoqués sa fermeture durant quelques jours/semaines.
A ce jour Infrabel ne nous a pas communiqué d’intention de fermeture définitive du passage à niveau à court ou long terme. L’investissement récent et conséquent réalisé sur ce passage nous laisse d’ailleurs présager quelques années de sursis…
bxl-forever (2023-09-27 06:39:24+00:00): Super.  Merci pour l’ajout, alors.
willkmis (2023-09-27 05:45:27+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM! If you don't mind me asking, what were you trying to do here? Your edit appears to have removed names from a few roads, and even turned one of them into a power line. I'm going to go ahead and switch them back, but if you have any questions, feel free to reach out! This beginner's guide might also help: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide.

Happy mapping!
Will
Supaplex (2023-09-27 00:24:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11179672/history
澎湖科大算是台灣的大學體系，為何改成學校？
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141794158
jmilot (2023-10-04 19:11:43+00:00): Hi there!

When adding sidewalks, be sure to also add crossings at every intersections please. Otherwise, you break pedestrian planners/routers using sidewalks information. They can't cross a street if no crossing is present!

Thanks,
whb (2024-01-28 16:51:53+00:00): Für einzelne Stellplätze ist amenity=parking_space besser geeignet:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=parking_space
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11221466068
streckenkundler (2024-01-28 21:19:12+00:00): Hei,
in den nächsten 10 Jahren wir er nicht mehr antworten:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15439

Sven
whb (2024-01-28 21:41:44+00:00): Hallo streckenkundler,

Danke für den Hinweis.
AlessandroPro (2024-05-07 07:32:13+00:00): ciao, al 61 mi pare ci sia la scala condominiale con una decina di appartamenti, forse è anche l'ingresso della radio ma non solo.
Daarbennikweer (2023-10-06 09:40:38+00:00): Hi,
Your public bookcases project reminded me of the (good old) Google Earth Community. And Minneapolis should paint the avenues in your colors!
Cheers,
Daarbennikweer
MxxCon (2023-09-27 03:20:31+00:00): How comes you deleted wikidata tag here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141794975
CurlingMan13 (2023-09-27 03:35:52+00:00): Crap.  That was unintentional.  I was trying to get a wikipedia tag, but ID removed the wikidata tag.

I'll get it readded.  They didn't have a wiki page, so I tried to create one, but it is still sitting in review, so the wikipedia tag isn't valid, most likely.
skquinn (2023-09-27 01:03:33+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

For future reference, when mapping address data the addr:housenumber tag should only contain the number, not the full address.
MxxCon (2023-09-27 03:25:37+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you draw another building on top of an existing one in Gerritsen Beach?
Also Harbor Fitness in Mill Basin should've been mapped as a node/POI rather than another building on top of existing one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141795030
Enock4seth (2023-10-11 10:35:36+00:00): I don't think we should be mapping every single building as "tourism=charlet", for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1211130379
pertile (2023-09-28 12:47:23+00:00): La calle se llama Azopardo, en Mapillary no estaba el cartelito todavía pero se lo ve en Street View y en el IDE Chaco si activás la capa Calles de Resistencia.
CurlingMan13 (2023-09-27 04:58:42+00:00): A couple things:
1) The landcovers should not partially overlap.
2) Features should not be deleted and readded.  They should be adjusted.

You can read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=Overlapping%20green/fairway/rough%20polygons%20(see%20graphic%20below).

I have gone ahead and cleaned up the golf course to address the pitfalls.
Kovoschiz (2023-09-27 10:23:16+00:00): Please stop doing meaningless changes. The info is already available in some form.
CurlingMan13 (2023-09-27 05:02:40+00:00): Is there a reason you didn't continue the golfcart path as a bridge over the river/stream/water?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 18:19:05+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3457347136/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit
What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-28 04:14:50+00:00): The lanes are separated from each other. There is no requirement for a curb separation.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-28 22:33:56+00:00): Apologies. It seems I was mistaken on the extent needed to count as seperation. I've added change:lanes tags and aligned the way with the center of the lanes.
Saikrishna Arcot (2025-04-07 04:46:20+00:00): Sounds good, thanks!
Supaplex (2023-09-27 15:19:25+00:00): highway=proposal 是用在計畫道路的，絕大部分的圖層如OpenStreetMap標準圖層是不會顯示的，除非計畫取消或是幻想路線，不然不用刪除
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141797333
Superbil (2023-09-27 15:46:58+00:00): 了解，所以要回復？還是要怎麼處理；因從 OSM 上看起來非常奇怪就是
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141797333
Supaplex (2023-09-28 09:34:28+00:00): 我這邊恢復了，就請之後留意是這種狀況
CoyKoi (2023-09-27 04:04:00+00:00): Hi Grady, when mapping sidewalks as separate features like this, it's important to create connections at intersections where a pedestrian can conceivably cross - even when no formal crossing infrastructure exists. Otherwise walking routing will become very convoluted or sometimes impossible. Examples in this edit are the intersections of Pioneer/Catherine Streets, and Cranwell St/Railside Ave.
Cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141797463
joel56dt (2023-09-27 13:33:34+00:00): Thanks for repairing this. I only realized I was doing this after I had finished a few.
ngry_pazuzu (2023-09-28 04:38:16+00:00): Thank you for the complement. But I do find it creepy that you are effectively stalking me.
joel56dt (2023-09-28 17:07:04+00:00): I regularly review the changes in the Vancouver area and I'm not just commenting on your work. It may feel like I am only commenting on your work but you can ask any other frequent editor in the area and they will know I have commented on their work. TBH, I find reviewing the local edits helpful for me to learn how to improve how I map and helpful for me to coordinate with how/what other mappers are doing. After all, OSM is a community project so it makes sense that the community has some dialogue.
ngry_pazuzu (2023-09-29 05:46:50+00:00): Yes, the community will have some dialogue. But you seem to jump on my changes so soon after I make them. I don't know what tool you are using to monitor and be alerted of my edits. I only use the web UI at https://openstreetmap.org, and have not seen a method in that UI of monitoring or being alerted of changes. I only know of changes if I see them in map, and that could be weeks or months after they have been made.
ngry_pazuzu (2023-10-01 18:08:47+00:00): So what tool are you using to monitor changes?
joel56dt (2023-10-01 18:15:46+00:00): I have a bookmark set to https://www.openstreetmap.org/history#map=12/49.2493/-123.0186
grafter (2023-10-05 10:38:48+00:00): Es wäre cool, wenn Du einmal kurz in der Diskussion anfragst, bevor Du das einfach änderst. Dann hätten wir klären können, ob construction oder proposed das richtige Lifecycle-Präfix ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3765356
grafter (2023-10-05 10:39:41+00:00): Jetzt haben wir
1. construction
2. proposed
3. fertiggestellt
Das macht als Ablauf echt wenig Sinn
StefanHRT (2023-10-05 15:36:57+00:00): Ich habe nur das fertiggestellt wieder entfernt, was jemand per Street Complete gesetzt hatte aufgrund der Frage ob die Baustelle fertig ist, denn von einer Baustelle war nichts zu sehen.
grafter (2023-10-06 10:11:00+00:00): Doch, da waren Markierungen und Bohrungen im Asphalt. Wenn sich die Person das richtig angeschaut hätte, wäre ihr das auch aufgefallen. Deswegen habe ich auch absichtlich nicht proposed gesetzt, sondern auf Construction
pesec (2023-09-27 09:15:49+00:00): Здравствуйте.
На основании каких данных вы присвоили участку улицы статус пешеходной? Тем самым вы разорвали дорожный граф для всех дорог строящихся кварталов.
citrula (2023-09-28 03:27:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I fixed some issues with the formatting of the tags on your restaurant. You can review them here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141844437
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141798683
eggie (2023-09-27 05:43:40+00:00): Dag Michel... Svp geen adresnodes aanpassen naar andere adressen in OSM.
Het effect is dat je dan een adres mist en een ander adres 2x voorkomt.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-27 05:47:12+00:00): Reverted by changeset #141800569
eggie (2023-09-27 05:47:58+00:00): Svp geen adressen toevoegen aan de gebouwomtrekken.
Er zijn adresnodes.
eggie (2023-09-27 05:36:32+00:00): Hi S... The regular traffic will take a shortcut here, but these roads are private.
I added private to prevent that.
eggie
Nawfal85 (2023-09-27 06:11:34+00:00): Hi LakeTiticaca;
There is no existing way across the space parking towards the main street.
this line is closed with the curbs.
you can see it with another type of satellite imagery.
Regard;
Nawfal
LakeTiticaca (2023-09-29 08:49:39+00:00): Thank you Nawfal85 for your message. These connections were originally drawn in by another user, but I can see they should not exist and have removed them. Thanks!
Nawfal85 (2023-09-29 10:08:01+00:00): Thank you LakeTiticaca
MxxCon (2023-09-29 02:35:00+00:00): This info actually goes into route_ref= tag
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141799426
eggie (2023-09-27 05:39:23+00:00): Hi 
Please add service=parking_aisle at parkings.
greetz
eggie
citrula (2023-09-27 06:03:09+00:00): Welcome back to OSM! Please don't add a name to features that don't actually have an official name. You don't need to add a name tag at all, you can just leave it blank.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141799790
forstner-m (2023-09-30 08:18:13+00:00): Hello,
are you sure there is a wayside cross? Unfortunately I cannot find it. A few meters south there is a other wayside cross. Maybe you entered that twice?
Thank you!
Best regards,
Michael
phlustik (2023-09-30 10:37:45+00:00): Hello,
I am sorry, the duplicate cross GPS was taken from a forum. I walked there yesterday and did not see the second cross either. I removed it now. Thanks
Petr
forstner-m (2023-09-30 11:13:38+00:00): Thank you! Here you can find abandoned places: http://www.zanikleobce.cz
wermak (2023-10-04 13:44:08+00:00): Hallo wkle, 

für solche Waldflächen bitte immer natural=wood verwenden. Landcover=tree wird in der Karte nicht angezeigt.

Schöne Grüße
Strubbl (2023-09-29 20:23:31+00:00): Hi pehyff, vielen Dank für deine weiteren Bearbeitungen. Ich kenne die Vor-Ort-Begebenheiten nicht, aber vom Kartieren hier auf OSM schaut das gut aus. Danke dir!
Strubbl (2023-09-29 20:31:48+00:00): Einen ICAO-Code gibt es für diesen Flughafen nicht, oder?

Es gibt eine auf OSM basierende Karte, die Flughägen schön darstellt:

https://openairportmap.org/EDAH#map=16/53.878530/14.151927
pehyff (2023-09-30 14:02:24+00:00): Unser Platz ist ein Sonderlandeplatz, diese Plätze haben keine ICAO-Kennung. 

Wir habe aber eine Website, die könnte man mit in den Datensatz aufnehmen:
https://usedomerfliegerclub.de/sonderlandeplatz-mellenthin/
Strubbl (2023-09-30 17:25:35+00:00): Die Website ist am Flugplatz bisher erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180476444

Aber die Hauptseite, nicht die spezifische Unterseite. Falls die besser passt, könntest du das dahingehend gerne ändern.