piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
4b696d (2025-04-05 20:34:09+00:00): I did not destroy anything and even if I did that is not automatically vandalism. Please actually read the linked wiki article. Do you really think that someone with way more mapping experience in his account is going to randomly vandalize?

The layer tag does not imply that the POI are anywhere. It has absolutely nothing to do with that. The POI may have level tags to tell on which floor they are at. How do you come to your conclusion? The layer tag only implies that the building is "over" the service highway. This is needed since the two features intersect. The layer tag does not indicate if anything "touches" the ground or not. Again, please read the wiki about layers.
Rogoyski (2025-04-07 22:02:30+00:00): I support the opinion that this is one building.

Linking the layer value with whether or not 'the building is touching the ground' has no grounds. The layer value of the building also implies nothing for the POIs that are found inside the building's outline.
Yog Sot (2025-04-08 11:29:30+00:00): great discussion lol
A whole building can't have `layer 1` because only parts of it are floating in the air so `highway` can go under it. 
Alternativelly you can tag the highway sections to be tunnels and you probably should, but really, speak to the point xD
4b696d (2025-04-08 19:19:18+00:00): I have started a discussion on this issue on the forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/i-have-been-accused-of-vandalism/128483
4b696d (2025-04-08 19:28:37+00:00): @Yog Sot
Why not? One could use tunnel=building_passage but not tunnel=yes. It is not a tunnel.
Yog Sot (2025-04-08 20:59:39+00:00): yeah, which you did not ;]
ya should really get more to the point rather than complain about vandalisms and the likes. just figure it out between yourselves
Rogoyski (2025-04-08 22:16:42+00:00): What @YogSot is saying about levels is simply not true.
Yog Sot (2025-04-09 00:32:45+00:00): well,  4b696d already knows how to solve the issue and work it our with Pavvv, but yeah, instead of giving out a solution, you hold it to yourself xD

IMHO whole thing could be one building, but without layer tag, tho then you gotta use tunnel=building_passage. 
tbh it should be used  even now
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-31 08:54:18+00:00): discussion continued in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166704422 and https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/i-have-been-accused-of-vandalism/128483/
martiensch (2025-04-05 16:48:38+00:00): dankjewel, ik had het vergeten
Baloo Uriza (2025-04-07 14:22:45+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:branch
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164529886
MaliMrav (2025-04-09 12:07:40+00:00): Hi,

I noticed that you enter names in OSM with lots of mistakes.

Here, for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12714197237/history/1 you mixed Greek letters with Serbian Cyrillic letters.

It seems to me that you OCR your photos, and just send resulting text to OSM with all the OCR errors.

Please check and correct all errors before sending them to OSM.

Thanks.
MaliMrav (2025-04-09 12:09:12+00:00): Sent the wrong link in my previous comment. This is the right link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12729874026/history/1
JesseFTW (2025-04-04 23:43:48+00:00): Thank you for your work on this!
HirschKauz (2025-04-06 08:32:48+00:00): tags and keys in english please
Salutations
user_5589 (2025-04-06 08:40:03+00:00): They mostly are and I intended them to be. Looks like some escaped being sorted out. I will remedy this.
Frans S (2025-05-06 08:20:58+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Your mappings are sometimes rather weird. It is sometimes hard to see how a building looks, with the shadows and multiple levels. Keep in mind that most buildings are rather regular and have squared corners. 
Even experienced mappers find these buildings difficult to map.
Best regards and keep mapping.
Baloo Uriza (2025-04-15 21:39:02+00:00): Is this a shop where you buy fuel in containers, or his this a gas station with pumps?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164531446
twitom (2025-04-15 21:41:54+00:00): Gas station with pumps!
Baloo Uriza (2025-04-16 13:04:35+00:00): Got it, changed it to a gas station.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164531446
demon_box (2025-04-05 16:50:25+00:00): Ciao, ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti un edificio può avere più entrate e di conseguenza più numeri civici. 
Quindi hai 2 opzioni: 
1. Se conosci esattamente la posizione (entrata) del civico che stai mappando metti tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su un nodo del perimetro dell'edificio (aggiungendo anche il tag entrance sullo stesso nodo);
2. Se invece non hai questa informazione così precisa devi mettere tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su nodo adiacente ma STACCATO dal poligono dell'edificio.
3. Quando mappi l'indirizzo lo devi mappare completo: mettere soltanto il civico (addr:housenumber) è un po' pochino e molto impreciso, almeno aggiungi anche la "Via".
Ho già proceduto con le correzioni del caso. 
Grazie e BuonMapping!
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2025-04-10 20:23:02+00:00): Please attach speed cameras to the road or create an enforcement relation.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dspeed_camera
BCNorwich (2025-04-05 05:57:43+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. 

The node you added has no descriptive tags so therefore is of no value/use in the OSM database.

Please read the help and guidelines linked above. Then add tags to the node.

Regards Bernard.
Baloo Uriza (2025-04-07 16:02:50+00:00): Looks like this one got added to the centerline of a street.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164531761
user_5359 (2025-04-19 15:06:19+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/618681404. You add building=yees (I correct this to yes), but you didn't deleted the tag demolished:building = yes. What is the status of the building?
Alliegaytor (2025-04-05 03:05:06+00:00): Hi rtaylor4,

The correct tagging for a private driveway is as follows: 

access=private
highway=service
service=driveway

oneway=no is not needed as it is assumed to not be a one way unless otherwise specified (i.e. oneway=yes)

I've fixed the tagging in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164534137

Everything else you've done seems completely fine, thanks for helping map this area! Please let me know if I've made any mistakes as I'm the active contributor here and not many people review what I do here.
fortera_au (2025-04-06 06:51:52+00:00): Only issue I can find other than what Alliegaytor has pointed out (and I agree with their comments) is that building:levels = 0 is incorrect, the only time that would be valid is if the building is underground and accompanied with building:levels:underground as a tag. If it's a single story building, you'll want building:levels = 1.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164532006
Alliegaytor (2025-04-05 02:57:33+00:00): Hi rtaylor4,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

I've noticed in this changeset you have added a waterway relation to where a building is (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18944157). I assume this was a mistake, so I removed it in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164534069).

Happy mapping :)
ALu68 (2025-04-05 08:21:16+00:00): Hallo Ox3DEV,

Es reicht nicht aus, nur einen name-Tag zu verwenden - ich habe den eine office-Tag hinzugefügt:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12730054169

Der Knoten sollte auch nicht mit einem anderen Objekt verbunden werden - schon gar nicht mit der Straße.

Für mehr Infos schau bitte ins Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office
DetectiveConan (2025-04-05 06:34:39+00:00): not good
b-jazz (2025-04-06 16:02:38+00:00): Please don't share the nodes of the green if you have the fairway surround the green. If you can't see any fringe around the green, you should make the fairway butt up to the green share the nodes on the boundary between the green and fairway instead. Please read the wiki for visual examples and instructions on how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions, please let me know and I'll gladly help clarify things. Thanks!
Frans S (2025-04-06 13:23:42+00:00): Hello.
A remark about the way a large building need to be mapped.
Just map over the roofline and move the whole to the footprint.
See attached sample

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hPkQqBa-C1oA_H_6fcgYGvAW34DFQ9o7/view?usp=drive_link

Best regards
LocalMapGuru (2025-04-18 16:23:47+00:00): Thank you!
NeisReview (2025-04-05 05:39:40+00:00): #NodeDragging

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for contributing to the map. I’ve reviewed your recent edits and noticed that at least one node of a way was moved. This can sometimes happen unintentionally, and it’s led to some unusual intersections or overlaps between street segments and other map elements.

Could you kindly confirm whether these changes were intentional or if they may have been made by mistake?

Thank you, and I look forward to your response!
---
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10797172436
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10124057797
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361933464
Bushfire79 (2025-04-05 18:37:32+00:00): I was just trying to delete the paths that stayed red on my wandrer.earth account. I walked right up to the school doors but the paths extended into the school. I'm not sure what node dragging is but that's all I was trying to do was shorten those two lines
Raymo853 (2025-11-29 21:15:41+00:00): I agree. When the projects begin, I will add those sections back.
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-12 20:44:56+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166172712
Frans S (2025-04-05 12:01:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please pay attention how to map tall buildings. (you can recognize them by the long shadow they give.)
Check this video
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=sharing
Best regards
marioymario01 (2025-04-05 04:09:14+00:00): La Aurora de la ciudad de Manta es una ciudadela no un barrio, en Mapcarta está mal ubicado eso
Frans S (2025-04-08 14:08:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping.
C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
E: Buildings not squared.
F: Buildings partly hidden under trees.
G: Included the shadow of the building.
H: Included a yard of clearing.
High building(s) incorrect mapped. See par 20 chapter About Buildings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164535499
Frans S (2025-04-08 14:08:25+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping.
C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
E: Buildings not squared.
F: Buildings partly hidden under trees.
G: Included the shadow of the building.
H: Included a yard of clearing.
High building(s) incorrect mapped. See par 20 chapter About Buildings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164535499
kortgodt (2025-04-05 06:59:50+00:00): Mølle skov er en del af Rold skov ikke eksklusive som dit edit antyder. Retter du eller skal jeg gøre det?
kortgodt (2025-04-05 07:16:53+00:00): rettet.
osmviborg (2025-04-05 07:20:20+00:00): Du magter ikke multipolygoner.
kortgodt (2025-04-05 07:30:02+00:00): Det er noget af en udmelding. Du fik også rykket skellet i skoven så det ikke passer med virkligheden (skovdiger).
osmviborg (2025-04-05 07:35:37+00:00): Brug lidt af weekenden her: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
silversurfer83 (2025-04-05 06:45:33+00:00): Hi :)

kennst du schon den Hintergrund Hessen ALKIS? Damit kannst du neuen Gebäuden auch gleich eine passende Adresse verpassen.

Happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164535982
Piagno (2025-04-05 06:37:30+00:00): Danke für das erweitern der Baustelle. Ich denke du hast es aufgrund der Notiz https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4696348 gemacht. Das nächste mal gerne auch die Notiz schliessen ;)
oruk09 (2025-04-05 12:28:52+00:00): 아파트로 변경되었습니다 업로드전 한번씩 확인해주세요~
user_17222985 (2025-05-18 04:13:33+00:00): перевір чи не втягнуло у зв'язок що сь з інших сіл бо у коментарі мова йде лише про село Мачухи  а я відкрив твою правку а там правка на половину Полтавської області 
якшо ти не все написав у коментарі то напиши що ти ще робив у цій правці
tio-Jorge (2025-05-19 11:14:18+00:00): Переважно найменування ( або перейменування) вулиць по селах
Jrachi (2025-04-06 06:22:27+00:00):  	

Ciao.
Quando aggiungi un guidepost, sulla relazione devi aggiungere il ruolo guidepost.

Ivo
dadavid (2025-04-17 11:57:45+00:00): hi,

du meinst sicherlich fire_hydrant:position=green und nicht fire_hydrant=green, oder? 

Geht um diesen Hydranten

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12729549949

Grüße
Hyperhenrik112 (2025-04-20 07:31:02+00:00): Ja meinte ich. Ups 😅
Hyperhenrik112 (2025-04-20 07:31:22+00:00): Aber danke für den Hinweis. Ändere ich sofort
selillium (2025-04-05 06:18:34+00:00): I forgor to add the rest of the comment: I adjusted the curvature of the links from US 59 Frontage Rd to First Colony Blvd and Sweetwater Blvd to US 59 Frontage Rd
olo81 (2025-04-05 14:34:07+00:00): To nie jest highway=residential tylko droga dojazdowa, tak że nazwa do wywalenia. Jak zmieniasz z drogi leśnej na inną to zwracaj uwagę na tracktype=grade1 itp. trzeba wtedy zmieniać i usuwać inne tagi. 
Odrazu to poprawiam.
citrula (2025-04-05 19:55:48+00:00): You added this business in the middle of the roundabout, which I find a bit dubious. Please do the built-in editor tutorial before you try again.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164566414
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-24 08:24:10+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489140080/history has surface = 3 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
charl3s (2026-05-24 12:39:15+00:00): No coś się zepsuło
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-25 08:39:34+00:00): poczyściłem tam tagi
SpaceTracer (2025-07-14 20:45:46+00:00): Hello relaemanila,
I noticed you were opening some construction and proposed highways while adding access=no tags when the construction is yet to be completed in areas around Manila (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138135854). This has left some odd rendering when these roads are connected to construction or proposed roads in OSM (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161055613). The highway=construction wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=construction#How_to_map_the_completion_of_road_construction) suggests that highways typically remain set as construction until made drivable/passable for general use. What do you think about changing them back to highway=construction for now while they remain inaccessible for driving through?
Thank you
-SpaceTracer
aharvey (2025-04-05 10:49:55+00:00): The tags look good.
osmviborg (2025-04-05 07:16:25+00:00): Nu har du lagt én skov oveni en anden, to multipolygon outer oveni hinanden. Det samme har du gjort mange andre steder.
kortgodt (2025-04-05 08:57:39+00:00): Mølleskov er ikke multipolygon.
aharvey (2025-04-05 10:48:09+00:00): "Sea side lane repair. Circulation in both directions on the remaining lane regulated by traffic light."

In that case the road is still accessible to traffic both directions, just with delays. Most data consumers expect highway=construction to mean it's undergoing construction and has not yet opened and therefore there is no access, so I wouldn't use the tag in this case, it will break a lot of maps and routers. I realise we don't tag for the rendered, but I think there has to be a better way to mark it as undergoing repairs but still open than just highway=construction.
ullemig (2025-04-05 11:06:51+00:00): Hi aharvey, I was following Tag:highway=construction and misinterpreted the mention to "minor" on top of the article as *besides*.

Now I was looking again on Key:construction#Highways and it's more clear to me that "minor" should be *instead*.

I'm reverting highway to "secondary" and leaving "minor" and I think it should be okay now.
fortera_au (2025-04-05 22:59:58+00:00): If it's going to be like that for more than 6 months I'd look at mapping that it's a single lane road, and potentially even as alternating one-way.
ullemig (2025-04-06 05:57:26+00:00): I have no idea. QLD Traffic gives no forecast as of the time of writing: https://qldtraffic.qld.gov.au/?id=659051

I don't know my way around the Douglas Shire website. This seems to be the latest update: https://douglas.qld.gov.au/download/Cape-Trib-Road-Visitor-Fact-Sheet2.pdf
kevinp2 (2025-04-06 18:42:33+00:00): Hi, please don’t delete the url:cadastre tag if you don’t understand what it is going to be used for.  A new municipality is being created here and this tag will help link properties to their official records.

Thanks!
kevinp2 (2025-04-06 18:42:50+00:00): Hi, please don’t delete the url:cadastre tag if you don’t understand what it is going to be used for.  A new municipality is being created here and this tag will help link properties to their official records.

Thanks!
mueschel (2025-04-06 19:16:00+00:00): This link to official sources is already contained in the ref:cadastre tag. The actual url doesn't need to be tagged - it can be generated automatically. And as urls like these tend to change often having only the reference number in the database is very much preferable.
MarcoR (2025-04-06 08:10:40+00:00): Ho rimosso i duplicati di Sciapade/S-ciapade. A proposito, qual è il modo corretto di scriverlo? Entrambi sono corretti?
DaveF (2025-04-05 14:17:13+00:00): Hi Welcome to OSM
FYI you moved a lamppost. https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/11015546176

Is there any signage for this path? My understanding was the track is private with no public access.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1374938508#map=18/51.405170/-2.419627
rempshaener (2025-04-05 18:23:16+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Mehr zu dem gesuchten Tagging findest du hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren#Weitere_Tags
Das wäre dann beispielsweise (bei beiden Fahrtrichtungen)
cycleway:both:width=0.8
cycleway:both:smoothness=...


Viele Grüße
geisthugo123 (2025-04-08 00:08:04+00:00): Hey, do you speak german or only german?
geisthugo123 (2025-04-08 00:08:22+00:00): Geman or only english I mean
ol_ (2025-04-08 05:28:54+00:00): beides
geisthugo123 (2025-04-08 22:05:32+00:00): Ah okay dann hin und erstmal danke für deine Edits.
Ich habe gesehen das du in einigen deiner letzten Changesets wie in diesem hier Wege mit access=private getaggt hast.
Private ist ein sehr strenges Tagging ähnlich wie access=no.
Genauso wie in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164539446 bei den Straßen an der Wiesenstraße ist das ganze laut offiziellen Liegenschaftskataster zudem öffentlicher und nicht privater Grund.
Das Problem daran ist das du damit quasi jedem diesen Weg verbietest. Das heißt zB das du hier theoretisch dem Postboten den Zugang zu den hinteren Häusern verbietest und sein Routing ihm sagt das er seine Briefe und Pakete vorne an der Straße abstellen müsste.
Daher kann ich mir eigentlich nicht vorstellen das access=private hier angemessen ist.
Viele Grüße
ol_ (2025-04-09 07:56:20+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe es nochmal überprüft und dieses Changeset "Stefan-George-Weg" angepasst. Das Postbotenbeispiel finde ich schwierig weil ich hier auf OSM niemanden etwas "verbiete". Genausowenig "erlaube" ich zB jmd ein Gehweg zu befahren wenn es auf OSM falsch eingetragen ist.
geisthugo123 (2025-04-13 20:30:07+00:00): Hi, ja du hast natürlich Recht das du dem Postboten hier nichts verbietest.
Dieser muss es vor Ort natürlich selbst einschätzen.
Was ich meine ist das du Navigationsgeräten verbietest diese Wege zu benutzen, welche aber fürs Routing sehr sinnvoll sein können.
Ich würde dann auch die anderen Erschließungswege in Weiterstadt wieder ändern.
Viele Grüße
eggie (2025-04-05 08:34:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Tatti Barletta (2025-04-05 12:43:59+00:00): Benvenuto e grazie per il contributo! Voglio farti notare che le modifiche ad alcune geometrie in questo e nei changeset successivi sono un po' grossolane, pertanto ti do un paio di consigli sull'uso di iD.
Quando crei o modifichi un poligono, una volta selezionato, puoi premere il tasto "Q" (oppure click destro -> Ortogonalizza) per "squadrarlo", in modo che tutti gli angoli siano retti.
Un'altra cosa a cui fare attenzione è l'allineamento: non sempre le foto aeree sono perfettamente allineate con i dati già presenti su OSM, per mantenere la consistenza quindi può essere necessario riallineare. Premendo "B" (o l'icona "Impostazioni dello sfondo" sulla destra) si apre il pannello di configurazione delle foto aeree e scrollando in fondo si può configurare "l'Offset delle immagini", sia inserendo l'offset manualmente, sia trascinando col mouse la parte grigia. Quando fai questo o quando disegni, cerca sempre di allineare i poligoni degli edifici alla base degli edifici nelle foto aeree, mai al tetto. Alcune foto aeree possono essere scattate da un'angolazione parecchio inclinata e il poligono risulterebbe disallineato di parecchi metri.

Faccio un revert delle modifiche alle geometrie, ovviamente mantenendo tutti gli altri dati che hai inserito, ma non prendere questa cosa nel modo sbagliato: nessuno nasce "imparato" e gli strumenti di OSM sono complessi e necessitano di pratica per acquisire dimestichezza. In altre parole, continua a giocare con OSM più che puoi, fai un grandissimo favore a tutti ed è l'unico modo per imparare. Due piccioni con una fava 😀
George Ionut (2025-04-05 15:33:51+00:00): Ok, grazie mille per il feedback! :)
Taya_S (2025-04-05 14:45:30+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164554994
NeisReview (2025-04-05 17:46:35+00:00): #DeletionsCheck

Thanks for reverting, Taya.
NeisReview (2025-04-05 16:47:17+00:00): #NoTags

Hi, welcome to OSM.

I've reviewed your latest map edits and it seems that this changeset you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
Jakka (2025-04-06 07:22:54+00:00): google maps may not be the source of your edits. google maps vous ne pouvez pas utiliser car ces carte sont copiright protected.