piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nascimentoesio (2025-09-10 18:32:46+00:00): Em dois lugares onde você fez correção, eu adicionei o local, mas você incluiu a tag #maproulette, que direciona para um site que não acrescenta nada. Qual foi a sua intenção ao fazer isso?
raphaelmirc (2025-09-10 19:00:49+00:00): Acredito que você nunca usou essa ferramenta chamada Maprollete e nem sabe pra quer serve por isso fala que não tem sentido. 

eu fiz o mapeamento dos nomes de ruas que faltava em varias cidades do brasil, inclusive porto velho, por isso essa #maproulette, o site de um tempo pra ca apaga as tarefas que foram feitas ou terminadas, não deixando mais ativas, por isso o site não está funcionando mais. 

e bom você ver a quantidades de ediçoes que eu tenho no Openstreetmap para ver que realmente sou um contribuidor, não só no mapeamento colaborativo mais também na construção da comunidade openstreetmap brasil, nos grupos no telegram onde você pode me encontrar,  https://t.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade  

no grupo do telegram da UMBRAOSM. https://t.me/grupoumbraosm 

por e-mail: raphael@umbraosm.com.br 

talvez você pense que eu queira aumentar as minhas contribuições mais eu não preciso aumentar-las não, ele são aumentas todos os dias com o mapeamento de varias areas no Braisl.
nascimentoesio (2025-09-10 19:37:27+00:00): Você veio tão direto em querer impor seu ponto de vista, que acabou até escrevendo várias coisas erradas, como “Maprollete”. Perguntei qual foi sua intenção ao adicionar a tag #maproulette. Se a sua alteração foi em uma rua, o que isso tem a ver com a minha contribuição, que foi a adição de uma igreja? Você simplesmente entrou na minha edição e colocou essa tag que não leva a lugar nenhum. Antes, eu até pensava que você fazia isso apenas para aumentar suas contribuições e aparecer para outros, mas depois da sua colocação, só aumentou minha desconfiança.
Se houver algum erro ou equívoco em minhas edições, fique à vontade para corrigir. Mas, por favor, não insira tags ou links que não ajudam em nada o leitor.
raphaelmirc (2025-09-10 20:15:20+00:00): Se você pensar bem você está equivocado em falar que eu colocou uma # em um mapeamento seu, quando na verdade eu usei uma ferramenta de mapeamento que se chama maproullete e tem até o link nos comentários, isso mostra que não foi um mapeamento inventado. 

E só olhar as minhas edições e a data que eu entrei no OSM que você vera que eu não preciso Criar # par aumentar minhas contribuições, mapeia naturalmente quase todos os dias.
raphaelmirc (2025-09-10 20:19:24+00:00): Portaria isso mesmo que não tem nada a ver a minha edição com a igreja que você mapeia, talvez por eu ter mapeado boa parte da cidade você esteja vendo esse comentário de outro mapeamento que não e o mapeamento que você fez. 

Procura a sua edição pra ver que não tem como eu colocar uma # no seu comentário.
nascimentoesio (2025-09-10 18:32:40+00:00): Em dois lugares onde você fez correção, eu adicionei o local, mas você incluiu a tag #maproulette, que direciona para um site que não acrescenta nada. Qual foi a sua intenção ao fazer isso?
raphaelmirc (2025-09-10 19:03:44+00:00): O Mapeamento foi feito na cidade toda, não só na área que você está falando.

saiba que as edições no OSM e como um banco de dados, uma pessoa mapeia e o outro pode atualizar os dados, vai ficar registrado. 

nesse caso que você fala não tem registro de versões do que você mapeou, então significa que eu não mapiei o que vocẽ fez. 

eu mapiei a cidade, outros pontos da cidade e não o seu endereço em si, que  você mensiona. 

procure se informar melhor antes de abrir comentario sobre as edições.
nascimentoesio (2025-09-10 19:49:05+00:00): Você veio tão direto em querer impor seu ponto de vista que acabou até escrevendo várias coisas erradas. Perguntei qual foi sua intenção ao adicionar a tag #maproulette, mas percebo que não compreende nem o significado de comentário. Então, encerro a conversa por aqui.
NeisBot (2024-12-21 02:06:37+00:00): Hi YourLocalEditor, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 86% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 2 highway(s)
- 1 building(s)
- 6 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=160455844
woodpeck (2024-12-21 08:56:13+00:00): The changeset description "CtlA2-Lud{2024}|przeb" does not sufficiently substantiate this deletion. Please add a human-readable comment that tells us why you made this edit and based on what information.
d3mol3k (2024-12-21 10:57:51+00:00): tu się nic nie buduje w tej i na razie nie bedzie - zniszczono działająca infrastrukture z pozycji fotela za biurkiem w zaciszu domowym - do wycofania a uzytkownik raczej z braku odzewu do zablokowania!!!
d3mol3k (2024-12-21 11:03:35+00:00): https://community-cdn.openstreetmap.org/uploads/default/original/3X/b/e/bef323f2a2452e80a9e32e1f6ceb6841b5dc9ef3.jpeg
A67-A67 (2024-12-21 10:38:03+00:00): 

Deze wijziging is incorrect. De naam in de name-tag hoort geen afkortingen te bevatten. Mocht de BAG-straatnaam wel afkortingen bevatten, kunnen deze worden toegevoegd d.m.v. de tag official_name, wat hier al was gebeurd.

Ik zal de correcte schrijfwijze herstellen.

Zie ook:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(do_not)
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Straatnamen_in_Nederland#Straatnaam_met_afkortingen
Colemagoo (2025-01-01 04:26:46+00:00): Hi, 
I don't think that adding seperate ways to Carrington Rd is - these are painted bike lanes on the main carriageway, not a seperate way (and the rebuild of Carrington Rd is years away.)

See the wiki: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway#:~:text=Cycling%20infrastructure%20that%20is%20an%20inherent%20part%20of%20a%20road%20%E2%80%93%20particularly%20%22cycle%20lanes%22%20which%20are%20a%20part%20of%20the%20road%20%E2%80%93%20should%20usually%20not%20be%20tagged%20as%20a%20separate%20cycleway%2C%20but%20by%20adding%20the%20cycleway%3D*%20tag%20to%20an%20existing%20highway%3D*%20instead.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway#:~:text=cycling%20infrastructure%20that,cycle%20lanes

This change probably needs to be reverted.
Colemagoo (2025-01-01 04:27:04+00:00): *is correct, sorry
ralley (2025-01-06 22:53:41+00:00): Thanks for addressing this, sorry I didn't reply earlier
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160456497
NeisBot (2024-12-21 02:44:37+00:00): Hi cjwatson324, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 36 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=160456573
Glassman (2024-12-21 03:25:03+00:00): I'm curious why you deleted these fields. And also their names Canary, joubert, and Fletcher. Are these their actual name or the owners name? If they are the owners name, we don't add personal information unless it is a posted sign. 

Please let me know.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160456573
cjwatson324 (2024-12-21 14:14:13+00:00): The names are the owners names. I removed the fields because of a separate program used to help generate maps for Farming Simulator did not see the fields. I wanted to redo the fields one at a time to see if that would help. When redone I will leave the name out.
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-23 07:56:47+00:00): Thank you for your private message on December 21 and the confirmation that the deletion was intentional.
A67-A67 (2024-12-21 10:36:57+00:00): Deze wijziging is incorrect. De naam in de name-tag hoort geen afkortingen te bevatten. Mocht de BAG-straatnaam wel afkortingen bevatten, kunnen deze worden toegevoegd d.m.v. de tag official_name, wat hier al was gebeurd.

Ik zal de correcte schrijfwijze herstellen.

Zie ook:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(do_not)
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Straatnamen_in_Nederland#Straatnaam_met_afkortingen
FM2441 (2024-12-21 18:28:02+00:00): Veste A67-A67,

dank voor de links die je hebt doorgestuurd. Toch verbaasd mij dat het principe: voer in zoals zichtbar in het veld, gaat hierin niet op. Ik ben heel benieuwd waarom er van afgeweken wordt.

Daarnaast lopen wij als hulpdiensten er tegenaan dat we niet uit de voeten kunnen met straatnamen die anders ingevoerd zijn dan ze officieel zijn. Het gaat nu zelf zo ver dat er stemmen op gaan om bij de hulpdiensten OSM niet te gebruiken door dit soort regeltjes. Het zelfde geldt voor rotondes. Dit is gewoon een weg/straat met naam, alleen loopt hij rond. Toch wordt steevast de namen weggelaten op een rotonde. Hier lopen wij tegenaan, dat OSM regeltjes bedenkt die ons niet helpen. Persoonlijk zou ik het heel erg vinden als afscheid genomen wordt van OSM, want het is de beste kaart die er is!

M.v.g.
A67-A67 (2024-12-21 18:46:41+00:00): De officiële BAG-naam wordt toch gewoon in OSM opgeslagen in de tag official_name? Op de pagina Straatnamen in Nederland staat een eenvoudig algoritme om de BAG-naam te vinden:
- Is er een tag official_name? Gebruik deze
- Is deze er niet? Gebruik te tag name.

Het lijkt me vreemd dat de software niet een zulk eenvoudig algoritme (1 if-else-statement) kan implementeren.
FM2441 (2024-12-21 19:02:27+00:00): Er wordt geen data geïmplementeerd, alleen gebruik gemaakt van de kaart op meldkamers en in de voertuigen.
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-24 13:23:57+00:00): Hi 吾心无聊,

may we know some background information about your changeset here? 

Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-05 15:28:21+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160594621
Supaplex (2024-12-21 03:30:56+00:00): ->鹿港
d3mol3k (2024-12-21 10:47:36+00:00): tu nie ma żadnych prac budowlanych - ulice i torowiska sa otwarte - zestaw do wycofania !!!
d3mol3k (2024-12-21 11:03:23+00:00): https://community-cdn.openstreetmap.org/uploads/default/original/3X/b/e/bef323f2a2452e80a9e32e1f6ceb6841b5dc9ef3.jpeg
Awoobis (2024-12-28 19:36:00+00:00): You need to swap all variants of name.
user_11609320 (2024-12-21 03:27:31+00:00): Master Case No. 22-128 Tentative Parcel Map No. 20580 (TPM 22-008) Design Review No. 22-059
papaj (2025-01-09 15:48:14+00:00): Why is the pedestrian area - 18447061 mapped as a multipolygon with ~30 individual ways (some consisting of only two nodes)? This should be mapped as a single area. If you are not sure how to use multipolygons and relations correctly please ask at the forums (https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/uk/86)
d3mol3k (2024-12-21 11:08:20+00:00): tory są wybudowane w tym zakresie co zostały zaznaczone co widac na miejscu
d3mol3k (2024-12-21 11:10:22+00:00): https://www.skyscrapercity.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,onerror=redirect,width=1920,height=1920,fit=scale-down/https://www.skyscrapercity.com/attachments/470197924_9005504566138777_6624320705910525693_n-jpg.8432995/
d3mol3k (2024-12-21 11:10:49+00:00): zmiana do wycofania - autor zgłoszony do zablokowania
M!dgard (2024-12-29 19:40:43+00:00): Hi, I'm afraid I have to tell you that your edits here were not good. A lot of damage to the map was done and you did also not succeed in adding your business. I understand that starting with OpenStreetMap is not easy, but you have demonstrated an extreme degree of carelessness here, and as such I believe that it would be best if you would not make further edits. If you would like to have your business mapped, you can always use the "Note" functionality to ask one of our experienced volunteers to do it. Provide any details such as name, address, which type of food you serve, a website if you have one, other contact information. It's the button with speech balloon and + icon. Best, Midgard
citrula (2024-12-21 08:47:56+00:00): Hello, it looks like you added this to the wrong location. The website and the address you added are not near the location. I have reverted it.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160461827
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
CurlingMan13 (2025-01-13 10:13:05+00:00): Is it a memorial or is more of an information board?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
HellMap (2024-12-21 13:04:52+00:00): Atkal izmaiņās ir masveidā izdzēsti elementi bez paskaidrojuma nevis pēc iespējas rediģēti. Un daudzi esošie iepriekš iezīmētie nav vispār pa jaunu pārzīmēti. Šis jau ir vairākas reizes atkārtots un lūgts tā nedarīt un cienīt citu cilvēku ieguldīto laiku. Citiem kartētājiem nav pēc tevis jāvelta laiks to labot.

Izdzēstu neatjaunotu elementu piemēri - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996709371, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/998016855,  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9203098032, utt.

Izdzēstu rediģējamu elementu piemēri - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996695251, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996983166, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/997016192 utt.
rskedgell (2025-08-18 23:02:50+00:00): You've marked these crossings as not having tactile paving, although it's abundantly clear from the aerial imagery that it is present (it's buff blister paving, used at uncontrolled crossings in the UK).

Recording this data accurately is important for visually impaired users of OSM. Don't guess and don't make things up.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
FajrAl (2024-12-21 06:51:45+00:00): singletrack tanah
NeisBot (2024-12-21 07:18:37+00:00): Hi TheLoyalOrder, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 natural(s)
- 3 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=160460014
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-23 07:57:49+00:00): Thank you for your private message on December 21 and the confirmation that the deletion was intentional.
Glassman (2025-01-05 23:42:06+00:00): OSM spells out street names. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. 

Can you please restore the names of all the street you changed? 

Thanks  
Glassman
JumpingFluff (2025-01-06 01:52:45+00:00): Working on that, read earlier in the wiki that names should be written as posted will have them reverted by 00:00 06/01/2025 CST (Midnight)
Kovoschiz (2024-12-21 07:26:22+00:00): Please don't upload personal test edits to a live prod public database. This is vandalism.
silversurfer83 (2024-12-21 14:19:58+00:00): Hi DBlum :)

wenn die Öffnungszeiten keinem festen Schema entsprechen, bzw. wenn es wie hier nur einen Text wie "nur nach Vereinbarung" gibt, dann gehört dieser in Anführungszeichen gesetzt. Details zum Thema findest du auch auf
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

bei Fragen immer raus damit
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160460743
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-21 08:10:54+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Siedlątków":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454297943
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1344500948
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1344500949

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-21 08:31:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1180032737

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2025-01-03 14:39:56+00:00): poprawione
wildmaps (2025-01-06 18:56:35+00:00): Hallo, danke für deine Änderungen. Beachte bitte dass laut Wiki und Verinbarungen in Italien alle Exponenten der Hausnummern kleingeschrieben werden. Weitere Infos hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses

P.S. Ein neuer Import der aktuellen Daten der Hausnummern in Südtirol ist in Vorbereitung.
wildmaps (2025-01-06 18:57:15+00:00): "L'esponente deve essere inserito in lettere minuscole (es: addr:housenumber=2b)."
ziomio (2024-12-21 08:50:59+00:00): https://www.parmatoday.it/attualita/nuova-rotatoria-provinciale-10.html
ziomio (2024-12-21 08:50:48+00:00): https://www.parmatoday.it/attualita/nuova-rotatoria-provinciale-10.html
eggie (2024-12-21 09:18:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
VLD549 (2025-01-29 17:38:00+00:00): Hi 001100N277, I was asked to verify name changes.
Could you provide a link of some sort to show it is called Boomkamp? I can't find it.
Thank you!
Hungerburg (2024-12-21 12:01:23+00:00): Hallo ext, das große S war schon richtig.
GeorgeKaplan (2024-12-21 12:40:55+00:00): Bienvenue sur OSM !
C'est tout bon pour moi, ne manque au bâtiment que le numéro de l'adresse.

J'ai vu que vous aviez aussi créé une note, ce n'était pas nécessaire puisque vous avez fait vous-même la modification.
GeorgeKaplan (2024-12-21 12:47:33+00:00): Bonjour, 

Je vous donne quelques conseils sur cette contribution : 
Plutôt que d'ajouter un panneau de signalisation, il est préférable de cartographier son effet sur la voie (voir la documentation sur https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Signalisation_routi%C3%A8re_en_France)
Je vous laisse appliquer le sens unique sur la portion de route concernée ?
Hufkratzer (2024-12-21 17:17:28+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1344512070 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1344508942 sind keine Reitanlagen (im Sinne von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding; das sind nur Reitplätze. Die werden in OSM normalerweise so getaggt wie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1075830134
Cageythree (2024-12-23 16:24:10+00:00): Danke, ist korrigiert.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-21 10:10:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1191478703

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-21 10:10:54+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1225032165

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-21 10:10:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12438420799
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1225031192

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-21 10:10:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/968272722

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-21 10:21:06+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993232068

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-21 10:21:08+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1225032477

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-21 10:21:04+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12438404899
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12438404900

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-21 10:21:07+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1225031103

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-21 10:21:07+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1225031350

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-21 10:21:05+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/272394321

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-21 10:31:03+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/902266277

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-21 10:31:01+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12438414938

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-21 10:31:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/758789335

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ChrissW-R1 (2025-01-11 23:12:39+00:00): Hi @chris66,

kurze Frage: wieso hast du service=driveway von https://osm.org/way/22924670 wieder entfernt? Hierbei handelt es sich doch um die Zufahrt zum Hof Grothues-Potthoff.
dvdhoven (2024-12-21 15:17:54+00:00): Met ID kun je geen routes aanpassen!!!!
Dat zal toch vaker met jou gecommuniceerd zijn.
Ik heb deze changeset reverted.
De wijzigingen heb ik daarna zelf doorgevoerd en alle rcn routes aangepast aan de nieuwe situatie.
Met name in Amsterdam zijn de rcn routes gevoelig voor schade oa door de vele forward/backward stukken in de routes.
Route 54-56 had het hele forward gedeelte in gort liggen na jouw bewerking en ik had geen zin meer om dat voor de zoveelste keer weer te herstellen.
Maar in de andere routes, die connecten met 56 kwam ik ook veel ID schade tegen.
Blijf in het vervolg van routes af of ga asap met JOSM aan de gang.

Dick van den Hoven