piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jeslop (2023-06-14 07:53:15+00:00): Hi Sabrina, can you provide more information on these points you have added? In Bing there is no evidence of these businesses and in the Spanish Cadastre they look like simple residential buildings. Further research on the web does not provide any information about the shops (the apartment buildings do not match their names either) and the comment to the changeset (creative world) raises doubts about the existence of these items. I will revert the changeset if you do not provide more information.

Regards,

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

------
Maschinelle Übersetzung:

Sabrina, können Sie mehr Informationen über diese von Ihnen erstellten Punkte geben? In Bing gibt es keine Hinweise auf diese Geschäfte, und im spanischen Kataster scheinen sie einfache Wohngebäude zu sein. Weitere Recherchen im Internet liefern ebenfalls keine Informationen über die Geschäfte (auch die Wohngebäude passen nicht zu ihren Namen), und der Kommentar zum Änderungssatz (creative world) lässt Zweifel an der Existenz dieser Punkte aufkommen. Ich werde den Änderungssatz zurückgeben, wenn Sie nicht mehr Informationen liefern.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
jeslop (2023-06-15 15:01:59+00:00): Reverted on changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137375670

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
map per (2023-06-13 19:53:10+00:00): Hallo Paulus_ayra,

und wilkommen bei OpenStreetMaps!

Wegen "Meine Änderungen überprüfen":

Die Änderungen sehen gut aus. Versuche aber bitte deine Changesets räumlich lokal zu halten (1). Speichere also bitte deine Änderungen und fange einen neuen Changeset an bevor du zu einer anderen Region wechselst.
Bei so großen Changesets wie diesem hier (2) ist ein Review mit standard analyse Software nicht mehr möglich.

Danke und viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
(2) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137299227
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-13 19:11:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10974811499
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100730348

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Tesla (2023-06-13 23:42:18+00:00): Не видаляйте POI на основі анонімних notes. Перевірку на місцевості ви явно не робили судячи з географіх ваших поередніх правок.
alexnder (2023-06-13 19:24:11+00:00): "Șoseaua Odăii" is perpetuated in various sources (mostly websites and news articles), including some official documents. However, there aren't any postal codes for "Odăii"  ( https://www.posta-romana.ro/cauta-cod-postal.html ) nor can "Odăii" be found on the city hall's page when searching for approved PUDs ( https://www.primariasector1.ro/PUD-documentatii-aprobate.html )
alexnder (2023-06-13 19:26:18+00:00): The correct name seems to be "Odăi" (single "i")
datendelphin (2023-06-17 11:07:45+00:00): Hi. Your changeset is OK. But We would appreciate a better changeset comment than "B". Something like: Refined forest outline
wille (2023-06-15 20:32:15+00:00): Olá Saulo. O correto seria mapear como Edifício exatamente apenas a área da edificação, não a área do terreno.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137300957
canfe (2023-11-13 18:27:32+00:00): Noto che ogni changeset ha sempre lo stresso titolo: improved road mapping
le regole guida specificano che si deve capire che cosa si è modificato.
VLD549 (2024-03-20 14:48:18+00:00): Hi, could you give me a link of the source that was used to verify the name change to Lieu-dit Noote Boom ?
Also, are you sure it is written separately I'm asking because I see it is Nooteboom as one as well in some results.
Thank you.
Kurt PM Lapere (2024-03-20 18:47:51+00:00): Dag Tom,
Er staat 'Lieu-dit Noote Boom' op het straatnaambord (langs de D 18). Bij de hoek in de Pluymstraete staat een bordje 'Noote Boom'. Langs de D 418 stond vroeger een bord met: Rue NOOTEBOOM. ViaMichelin heeft ook beide spellingen, aaneen en los. Mvg, Kurt.
VLD549 (2024-04-04 13:10:28+00:00): Thank you for the response!
lipuma (2023-06-14 13:32:40+00:00): Hi, this changeset added a lot of the following tag:

`Canadian Pacific Kansas City=CPKC'

Are you sure this is correct?
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-07-14 17:40:34+00:00): The bike way was already marked as
cycleway:right=track
oneway:bicycle=no
on a carriageway and visible on cycleOSM and cyclemap.
Not a problem, I'll remove it, just something to look out for, like when a sidewalk is mapped on the carriageway.
wille (2023-06-15 20:24:58+00:00): Olá, Bruno. Bem vindo ao OSM! Fiz algumas melhorias na sua edição. O canteiro central da avenida havia sido mapeado como parque. Além disso, você havia alterado uma área residencial para edifício. Se tiver alguma dúvida, entre em contato comigo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137301289
user_5359 (2023-06-14 05:11:53+00:00): Willkommene Bei OSM! Danke für das Eintragen von Öffnungszeiten, aber denke daran, dass wir britisches English bei den Schlüsseln und Werten sprechen. Details zu den manchmal recht komplexen Thema findest Du unter https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-13 20:42:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/410042077
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/410042079

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
habi (2023-06-15 10:40:23+00:00): Hey vmicho!

You've changed my traffic calming island (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1177549923) to landuse=grass and barrier=wall.
This is *definitevely* not `landuse=grass` as seen on the swisstopo imagery, it's a little bit of shrubbery and mostly stones/gravel.
Please don't just tag for the renderer, i.e. so that this shows up as a green circle on OSM Carto!
Try to add correct data to OSM, not just to make it look pretty.

Also, if you *really* insist on doubly-tagging this landuse with a wall around it, then please also add a `height`-value.
IIRC when I passed this roundabout on bike it didn't really look like there's a 'wall', and the shadows on the swisstopo imagery seem to confirm this.

In addition you've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1181861983/ as traffic island. In my opinion and according to the wiki this tag should only be used for the structure that is *not* possible to pass by vehicles. In my opinion here this looks like it could be passed by cars and trucks, hence I would not tag this as island. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:traffic_calming%3Disland for an explanation.

Greetings from Bern,
habi
vmicho (2023-06-15 18:39:43+00:00): Hi. Well, on imagery it is definitely green. Probably more like scrub or garden, or garden with scrub. Will redo a bit.
For the island: i think it is correct, no vehicles normally there, HGV can pass basically over anything when needed. And is also more appropriate than "painted_island " as it is also physically raised.
Tatti Barletta (2023-06-14 06:58:04+00:00): Hi, from satellites I don't see anything that resembles a park in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1181863950 . Can you please check if it was just an error?
MxxCon (2023-06-25 22:02:07+00:00): @Tatti Barletta, if you see wrong data, it should either be reverted or corrected.
Cebderby (2023-06-25 22:27:10+00:00): This changeset contained 39 building-tagged polygon 'splodges' roughly where buildings are in Scotland.  And 8 not much better in Colombia.  Plus 1 fictional park area in Germany (as 1st comment) adding a node to an existing track. It also dragged nodes in Scotland (1 road junction, 1 fast food, 2 other road ends).
Nothing relating to the changeset comment and nothing of value.  Fully reverted.
Tatti Barletta (2023-06-25 22:29:33+00:00): @MxxCon I don't have any means to confirm it's wrong, but a park inside a forest... my spider sense is tingling. I would have prefered to hear from the original contributor before reverting something I'm not entirely sure about, though.
gfdklgdldsfgkgfd (2023-06-22 15:47:28+00:00): Merci beaucoup pour ce premier changeset. Et bravo pour avoir trouvé que la rue du Mont Cenis était manquante ! Je suis souvent passé par cette rue mais je n'avais jamais fait attention qu'elle n'était pas présente sur OpenStreetMap
Joseph R P (2023-06-13 21:45:25+00:00): Hello, this route is actually signed as part of the VA 236 West route, despite it following a two-way road. If you're going west along 236/Main Street before the split, there is a sign directing 236 West traffic to make a right onto Blenheim Boulevard, and then along Blenheim, there is a reassurance sign with arrows directing traffic onto North Street, and eventually traffic is lead back to Main Street. It is confusing, but the pre-existing configuration before your changes was correct.
Deciduous Waffle (2024-05-12 09:33:07+00:00): Hi STR-EC, thank you for all of your cycling contributions to Windsor-Essex County!

I have a few concerns with how you've added the EC100 route. Is this actually a signed cycling route? Only signed routes that can be physically verified are meant to be added to the map. Everything else is best left to Strava, Komoot, etc. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dbicycle

I also noticed that you've renamed streets and paths with "EC100 Bike Route (Mile x)" ex. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137303025. The names of these streets should reflect what's on the street signs. Modifying these for your reference affects other OSM users who rely on accurate street names.
Ropino (2024-05-02 17:05:24+00:00): Hi,
place:locality="Hasenberg" ?
Gibt es diese Bezeichnung im Sinne von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:place%3Dlocality wirklich? Den gleichnamigen Berg gibt es etwas südwestlich davon ja auch noch.
Manuel H (2024-05-02 18:00:18+00:00): Lang ist's her. Ich bin mir zu 99% sicher, dass es so auf dem Wegweiser an der Ecke steht. Evtl. sogar mit den Anführungszeichen, weil ich die sonst nicht setzen würde.
So wie hier, nur ohne Anführungszeichen, an der Wetterfahne weiter südlich: https://www.komoot.com/de-de/plan/@51.8299689,10.2590488,15.178z?sport=hike&waypoint=hl:5775048 

In solchen Fällen tagge ich den Ort so, weil es der Orientierung dient, da es auch vor Ort ausgeschildert ist.    
Da der Hasenberg aber ja eher ein flacher Hügel ist, kann auch sein, dass die Macher einfach den Namen auf jedes Schild in der Nähe gepackt haben.
habi (2024-01-29 14:28:29+00:00): Ciao eTom66
Ich habe die öffentliche Pumpe schon als https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10743274733/ hinzugefügt.

Auch weil deine Variante als 'Veloverleih' nicht ideal erfasst ist, habe ich deine gelöscht.

Gruss,
habi
lipuma (2023-06-14 13:47:30+00:00): Hi Tomás, what does POZO PLU mean?
Human1each (2023-06-14 17:10:37+00:00): Correction: Source used was Bing aerial imagery.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-13 21:20:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9997278645

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
demonq (2023-06-13 21:49:46+00:00): Dziękuję za poradę.
Poprawiłem tagi.
NorthCrab (2023-06-14 00:53:07+00:00): :-)
gscholz (2023-06-15 05:58:57+00:00): Hi padvinder,
your edits tend to leave behind errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=4.68168&lat=52.62313&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this? You may want to think about how to avoid this type of error, as it seems to be systematic for your work.
Kind regards
Guido
aTarom (2023-06-14 06:06:38+00:00): Hi, 4Ems,
Can you check this
"Paseo"="Ferrocarril"
at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1181876525/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1181876526/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1181876527/history
the closest name is "Passeig del Ferrocarril" but it's too far, thanks for editing
Cheers
JJIglesias (2023-06-13 23:47:23+00:00): Saludos. Todas las vias de Servicio que borraste existen. En q te basas para borrarlas? Estoy pidiendo al DWG q abra un ticket y revierta tu Changeset borrando data valida. 

Borrar data valida se puede considerar Vandalizar el Mapa.

Gracias
JJ
rodolfovargas (2023-07-22 11:44:03+00:00): Saludos.
Se borró los datos para volverlos a cargar sobre la base de Mapeo en campo y imágenes de DRON-UAV.
En la actualidad ya están respuestos todos los caminos y sendas peatonales con un alto detalle.
JJIglesias (2023-07-26 21:58:20+00:00): Gracias
BrownianMotion (2024-04-13 10:59:09+00:00): Hi, are you sure these changes are correct? You've deleted the footpath at the end of the Rijnkade. I've put that back now, but I'm not experienced enough to review the complete changeset.

Can you please check if you've haven't inadvertently deleted other roads/paths?
eggie (2024-04-13 16:04:31+00:00): Beste BM   Mapper BertMule verwijdert doorlopend de edits van medemappers...   Antwoorden blijven helaas uit.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=137304041
Je zou ze evt weer kunnen intekenen met de juiste accesstags (private denk ik)

MVG
eggie
BrownianMotion (2024-04-13 17:28:36+00:00): Ha eggie, bedankt voor de link. Het valt gelukkig mee. Hij heeft ook het verlengde van de Evertsenstraat verwijderd. Mij lijkt 'access=destination' geschikt. Klanten/bezorgers/bezoekers kunnen er gewoon gebruik van maken.
eggie (2024-04-13 17:31:07+00:00): 👍 up to you.
eerib (2023-06-13 22:45:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by changeset #137304990. Deleting a feature that exists violates the ground truth policy. Please refer to the following related wiki pages for more information.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ground_truth

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information

The correct approach for dealing with an unsanctioned trail is to use the informal tag. Please refer to the following wiki pages.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Trail_Access_Project

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:informal
eerib (2023-06-13 22:40:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by changeset #137304872. Deleting a feature that exists violates the ground truth policy. Please refer to the following related wiki pages for more information.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ground_truth

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information
bradrh (2023-06-17 17:07:06+00:00): I  don't know much about NHD, but the wiki says that nhd:reach_code is useful.  See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nhd:reach%20code?uselang=en
and
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-June/053408.html
eerib (2023-06-13 23:15:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by changeset #137305412. Deleting a feature that exists violates the ground truth policy. Please refer to the following related wiki pages for more information.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ground_truth

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information

The correct approach for dealing with an unsanctioned trail is to use the informal tag, which this trail already has Please refer to the following wiki pages.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Trail_Access_Project

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:informal
Supaplex (2023-06-15 12:13:50+00:00): Already mapped https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520761591
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137305121
Supaplex (2023-06-15 11:48:14+00:00): Already mapped
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/207840
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137305164
Taya_S (2023-06-14 03:35:52+00:00): Hallo Jan Kees,

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Groeten,
Taya
Patr1k_P (2024-01-18 13:00:42+00:00): nakreslil si budovu a tuto cestu si preco nezmazal, ta tam asi nebude ked tam stoji budova https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297646467/history
Patr1k_P (2024-01-18 13:11:20+00:00): to iste tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/770716473/history

..a takto sa adresy neznacia, to iste ref hodnota, bud jedno alebo druhe, pripadne 2 body na budove ako body...podla katastra tam ma byt 377

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1181893582/history
anirud (2024-01-18 19:04:18+00:00): Sa mi zda, ze ta cesta uz neexistuje. Ale neviem to teraz preverit. Vedla je cesta k novej vystavbe. Podla leteckych snimok tam tiez nie je.

Adresu som opravil.
Patr1k_P (2024-01-19 13:03:18+00:00): no vsak to som ti pisal, ked tam je budova, tak asi nejde cesta cez budovu? tak mal si aspon cas cesty odmazat, aby nesla cez budovu
Supaplex (2023-06-15 12:16:31+00:00): Already mapped 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7362354
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137305294
Supaplex (2023-06-15 12:15:14+00:00): Already mapped
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396410905
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137305385
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-21 10:33:29+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10975502750/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Supaplex (2023-06-15 12:48:40+00:00): Already mapped https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/544366061
And your report location is wrong
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137305438
aTarom (2023-06-14 06:34:53+00:00): Hi sabrina21, the deleted
"man_made"="groyne"
at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1055221388/history
is not valid?
Cheers
jimmy_conway (2023-09-12 09:17:46+00:00): There is at least one severe error in this changeset. This river certianly does not exist, I deleted it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1181894982
@aTarom: If possible, I suggest you check and add the "man_made"="groyne" again if valid?
jimmy_conway (2023-09-12 09:19:43+00:00): And another one I deleted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1181894978
DD1GJ (2023-11-19 20:26:02+00:00): Hallo Yufa,

danke für dein Engagement, aber der Rettungspunkt OF-216 befindet sich seit 10 Jahren 1,1 Kilometer weiter nördlich in den OSM-Daten und stimmt auch mit den amtlichen Daten überein. An dieser Stelle sollte sich OF-316 befinden.

Da die amtlichen Daten zudem vereinzelt fehlerhaft sind, sollte daher von ungeprüften Importen aller Art abgesehen werden, siehe Bundeslandübersicht und Vorträge unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Demergency_access_point

Ich habe daher die von Dir aus dem Geoportal übernommenen Rettungspunkte gelöscht.

Du kannst natürlich gerne anhand des Geoportals die Standorte aufsuchen und dann an der gefundenen Position die selbst gesehene Nummer eintragen. Manchmal gibt es da jedoch Überraschungen vor Ort.

Viele Grüße, Joachim
Warin61 (2023-06-14 00:45:12+00:00): These are in Victoria.. the DCS stuff is NSW only. 

What is the source of this information?!
mcliquid (2023-06-15 06:16:35+00:00): Hi, entfernst du die Testdaten auch wieder selbst?
lipuma (2023-06-14 13:21:34+00:00): Hi Tom, this way contains the tag `hydronamestring' and `note:relevance'.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/210714098

Are you sure these are correct? Just a heads up, happy mapping!
Tom Brennan (2023-06-14 22:28:10+00:00): The 'hydronamestring' should have been deleted before merging. I obviously missed that one! Feel free to delete if you spot any others.

I've left note:relevance in place in the same way that TheSwavu has done for the remainder of the NSW named streams imports eg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445413628
acubens71 (2023-06-16 14:00:11+00:00): Bonjour,

Il y a encore des problèmes d'accentuation dans ces imports (ex : "Rue du Pre aux Chevres" devrait être "Rue du Pré au Chèvres"). Ne pas hésiter à vérifier l'orthographe avant import, merci !
Jakka (2023-06-15 06:32:16+00:00): SVP ajouter "addr:housenumber" on the main building/house not shed or gardens this objects have no official address
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-16 14:07:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137413707 where the changeset comment is: Incompletely discussed mechanical edits - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7215 and links from there.
ElliottPlack (2023-06-14 01:35:59+00:00): To confirm, the bridge that no longer exists is still closed, but drivers can now enter NB I-95 from Milnor Street and exit SB up to Exit 30. Please confirm, thanks.
ElliottPlack (2023-06-14 01:46:20+00:00): Also, Rick, it'd be super helpful if you have any firsthand experience in the area if you could say whether or not this road is open: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43056865

According to Waze it has been deconstructed but it looks like it is there on imagery.
rickmastfan67 (2023-06-14 03:02:03+00:00): Look @ my source link in the changeset info.  It has the official detours on it, and it clears says that I-95 SB is open to Exit #30 now.  And it says that people can reenter NB @ Milnor Street.

I wouldn't have made this change if it wasn't backed up by PennDOT source material since I'm from the other side of PA.  Plus I've seen news reports showing traffic using said ramps. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nW9K1Z-j_-8 (skip to around the 3 minute mark).

Scroll down to "Southbound I-95 detour (local)" & "Northbound I-95 detour (local)" to see this.

As for that 'ramp', I know it's not open to I-95 NB traffic, as PennDOT is forcing everyone off @ Exit #26.  Not 100% sure if it's open to Betsy Ross Bridge traffic.
ElliottPlack (2023-06-14 05:09:33+00:00): Thanks! all looks good here. If you see any other detours lifted/updated, feel free to adjust.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-16 14:07:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137413707 where the changeset comment is: Incompletely discussed mechanical edits - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7215 and links from there.
MxxCon (2023-06-25 22:36:53+00:00): Hello.
If you are mapping sidewalks, they are supposed to be tagged as such, and not just footway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137306436
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-16 14:07:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137413707 where the changeset comment is: Incompletely discussed mechanical edits - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7215 and links from there.
avinet_ua (2023-06-14 01:05:20+00:00): reverted
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-16 14:07:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137413707 where the changeset comment is: Incompletely discussed mechanical edits - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7215 and links from there.