piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-31 13:20:17+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9106070475
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9106070474
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9106070473
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149644878
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149644858
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149644861

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
une abeille (2023-08-31 23:35:12+00:00): What do these points represent?

Qu'est-ce que ces points représentent?
Graptemys (2023-09-11 23:49:24+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141137030
marczoutendijk (2023-08-31 18:57:01+00:00): Can you improve your changeset comments?
Just stating the day of your edit is not very helpfull to other mappers.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
eggie (2023-08-31 15:45:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Jose Luis Infante (2023-09-01 15:25:32+00:00): Gracias por la edición. Te recomiendo que añadas el nombre a las calles del pueblo.
Un saludo!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140635588
Frans S (2023-09-01 07:43:56+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140635623
Hufkratzer (2023-08-31 18:46:55+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1203938630 looks like a riding arena and not like a riding center; riding arenas are usually tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dho
rse_riding
There is a special preset for riding arenas in iD, search for "riding arena"
Tagging example from your region: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/271672943
MxxCon (2023-09-01 05:39:52+00:00): Hello.
This edit must be reverted. This IS "Avenue N", as in letter of the alphabet. Street to the north of it is Avenue M, street to the south is Avenue O.
Please pay closer attention to your changes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140635888
confusedbuffalo (2023-09-01 06:08:41+00:00): Apologies, I did notice shortly after and reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140636629
MxxCon (2023-09-01 05:40:04+00:00): Hello.
This edit must be reverted. This IS "Avenue N", as in letter of the alphabet. Street to the north of it is Avenue M, street to the south is Avenue O.
Please pay closer attention to your changes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140635901
confusedbuffalo (2023-09-01 06:08:40+00:00): Apologies, I did notice shortly after and reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140636629
MxxCon (2023-09-01 05:40:26+00:00): Hello.
This edit must be reverted. This IS "Avenue N", as in letter of the alphabet. Street to the north of it is Avenue M, street to the south is Avenue O.
Please pay closer attention to your changes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140635918
confusedbuffalo (2023-09-01 06:08:35+00:00): Apologies, I did notice shortly after and reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140636629
MxxCon (2023-09-01 05:40:35+00:00): Hello.
This edit must be reverted. This IS "Avenue N", as in letter of the alphabet. Street to the north of it is Avenue M, street to the south is Avenue O.
Please pay closer attention to your changes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140635940
confusedbuffalo (2023-09-01 06:08:43+00:00): Apologies, I did notice shortly after and reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140636629
MxxCon (2023-09-01 05:40:42+00:00): Hello.
This edit must be reverted. This IS "Avenue N", as in letter of the alphabet. Street to the north of it is Avenue M, street to the south is Avenue O.
Please pay closer attention to your changes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140635947
confusedbuffalo (2023-09-01 06:08:42+00:00): Apologies, I did notice shortly after and reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140636629
MxxCon (2023-09-01 05:40:55+00:00): Hello.
This edit must be reverted. This IS "Avenue N", as in letter of the alphabet. Street to the north of it is Avenue M, street to the south is Avenue O.
Please pay closer attention to your changes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140635953
confusedbuffalo (2023-09-01 06:08:38+00:00): Apologies, I did notice shortly after and reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140636629
infeeeee (2023-08-31 14:15:33+00:00): Szia!

Bezárt éttermeknél, üzleteknél  a disused: prefix használata ajánlott a pont törlése helyett. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:*

Tehát elég lett volna, ha csak az amenity=fast_food címkét átjavítod disused:amenity=fast_food-ra, így már nem jelenítik meg a megjelenítők. Ez azért is hasznos, mert ha később más üzlet vagy étterem nyílik ugyanott, akkor nem kell új pontot létrehozni, és visszakövethető lesz az üzlethelyiség története, mi nyílt minek a helyén.

Legközelebb eszerint járj el kérlek.

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
Z737 (2023-08-31 14:31:54+00:00): Szia!

Tudok a disused prefixről (direkt rákerestem a szerkesztés előtt), de itt az étterem bezárása után a terület egybe lett nyitva a szomszédos kínai étteremmel (jelenleg is annak része), ezért gondoltam úgy, hogy a disused nem lenne megfelelő ebben az esetben, mert ugye a hely maga használva van.
Rosszul gondoltam?
bkil (2023-08-31 22:29:56+00:00): Ilyenkor még alternatíva a was:
infeeeee (2023-09-01 10:12:49+00:00): Mind a kettő megoldás (was: vagy törlés) jobb annál, mintha egy nem létező dolog lenne jelölve a térképen, szerintem jó így is ebben az eseteben.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-31 13:50:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2186661562
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429721749

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MxxCon (2023-09-01 06:23:14+00:00): Thank you for fixing this. 👍
I was looking at changesets in chronological order and didn't see this one before leaving comments on others.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140636629
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-31 14:00:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1111653395

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
habi (2023-08-31 14:15:20+00:00): Oops, sorry für das grosse Changeset.
Einerseits habe ich nicht mehr sichtbare Feldwege um https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89255027/ gelöscht (und in JOSM) vergessen.
Andererseits habe ich ein paar Häuser um https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203861109 neu gezeichnet und dort die GWR-Daten eingepflegt.
eggie (2023-08-31 16:47:59+00:00): Beste Zuidplas   Adresgegevens horen niet op de gebouwomtrek.
Er is al een adresnode.. Ook svp niet de BAGdata verwijderen. 
Ik heb e.e.a. hersteld
Welk bedrijf zit hier? 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-08-31 16:55:03+00:00): Ahh  Je hebt het gebouw aan willen passen... Ik zie al wat je hebt gedaan. Zal wel even in de BAG kijken.
eggie (2023-08-31 17:03:31+00:00): Aldi toegevoegd op 64c.. Vreemd .. het bedrijf geeft 64 aan, maar dat is het woonhuis vooraan.


MVG
eggie
Zuidplas (2023-08-31 17:39:05+00:00): Ja, google geeft aan dat huisnummer 64 is, maar volgens bag is het 64c. 64 is inderdaad huis vooraan.
eggie (2023-08-31 17:48:00+00:00): Je kunt in een volgend geval gewoon een import vragen via het forum van osm.
Dan komen alle juiste data mee.
Wamneer je zelf intekent liggen bij een periodieke import twee gebouwen op elkaar.
Je zou de parkeerplaats nog kunnen intekenen als vlak met amenity=parking

Mapse..
eggie
seartroy (2023-08-31 14:41:17+00:00): Top effort!
Ethan Colley (2023-08-31 14:41:43+00:00): cheers boss
map per (2024-05-09 13:50:42+00:00): Hallo ginnyTheCat,

for the cycle lane between the two car lanes (1) I wouldn't add cycleway=no, but cycleway:left=no + cycleway:right=lane + cycleway:right:lane=exclusive.

The road section still has a cycle lane in the westwards direction. The lane is just not located on the very very right of the street.

Best regards
map per

(1)  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58561799
ginnyTheCat (2024-05-09 13:57:15+00:00): I agree. Back then I didn't know. The main reason I did this changeset as far as I remember were the number of :lanes not matching up between the turn:lanes and bicycle:lanes.
map per (2024-05-09 20:12:42+00:00): Great, I re-added the cycle lane tags
Waaslander (2023-08-31 14:36:42+00:00): *Hansbeke
eggie (2023-08-31 16:25:38+00:00): Dag Bazza..   Dat is inderdaad correct.
Groet
eggie
Awoobis (2023-09-08 14:07:22+00:00): No.
trigpoint (2024-08-07 18:10:59+00:00): Hi
This edit seems to have gone very wrong in a number of ways. What sources are you using as your en-US locale suggests you are not local?

The name tag should only be used for actual names, not as a placeholder for random information. It was this howler I spotted on my OSMand screen.

There is no service road here, there is a track on bing imagery but in no way is this a fire engine road, a most basic survey would show that it is too steep for fire access and it does not exist. However there is signage indicating that the road is a fire route and the yellow box should be kept clear.

Are you in some way employed to make these map edits remotely?

Cheers Phil
Velocity01 (2024-08-08 08:38:57+00:00): Hi Phil,

I am the NHS Travel planner for the Trust for the last 7 years. Although the whole area will be changing over the next 4 years due an expansion of the hospital.

Kr
Alex
amadvance (2023-09-01 06:07:38+00:00): Ciao Marco,

Vedo che stai aggiungendo gli edifici di alcune edicole votive, anche quando queste sono già rappresentate da un punto che le descrive. In pratica sono oggetti duplicati.

Per elementi così piccoli, tipo santelle, capanni, panchine, tavoli, la mappatura con un singolo punto è meglio dato che 
sono talmente piccoli, che l'errore di precisione nella mappatura è superiore alla loro dimensione.

Discorso diverso se sono veri e propri edifici, come delle cappelle, o capanni di una certa dimensione.

Ciao,
Andrea
Fraxi (2023-08-31 14:50:27+00:00): Forgot to add "source:Bing streetside" for corroborating.
olo81 (2023-09-03 01:11:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1203960193/
access=no  oznacza że jest zakaz poruszania się tą drogą w obu kierunkach. 
Drogi dojazdowe oznaczamy access=private jesli np. właściciel tam dojeżdża do garażu, czy pieszo chodzi. 
Ewidentny błąd do poprawy.
olo81 (2024-01-04 09:08:58+00:00): Dlaczego nie poprawia pan błędów po sobie?
eggie (2023-08-31 15:52:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback Dit lijkt me in ieder geval niet correct. Je plakt een highway=construction op een bestaande weg. Hoe de status van de weg nu is zul je toch zelf ter plaatse moeten checken. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-08-31 16:08:20+00:00): Op grond van laatste sat foto aangepast.
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=brtachtergrondkaart&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=31-08-2022&loc=52.20507%2C4.897317%2C17z&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-08-23&acqid=20230823_105248_PNEO-04_1_1&sensor=Pleiades-NEO

Even ctrl-f5 voor het effect

MVG
eggie
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-09-03 16:22:58+00:00): changed to unclassified: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1203962654
rskedgell (2024-01-31 13:05:29+00:00): Adding foot=no implies a legal prohibition for pedestrians on the carriageway, which would be explicitly signed. Adding appropriate sidewalk tags (in this case, sidewalk:both=separate).

Adding access=no prohibited routing across the bridge for *all* transport modes, which is unlikely to be what you intended.
SekeRob (2026-03-13 09:44:28+00:00): Hi dp7

You may have seen me going around mapping a lot in this region and splitting up forests with too many members. Today while 3 way splitting a 413 member one with countless small 'outer' sections too, stumbled on many scree areas that were not made 'inner'. Was that to be done or is there a 'for rendering' reason (something a mapper acknowledged up in the Alps/Dolomites.... all these zones seem to have more or less scrub growing in them of low to medium coverage.

Cheers
SekeRob
dp7 (2026-03-13 12:06:59+00:00): Hi Sekerob, there's no "rendering reason": it's just that these scree areas appear to be both scree and trees at the same time, as is often the case. I don't remember exactly, but that's probably why I preferred not to clearly separate them from the forest (or maybe I just forgot to do it).
SekeRob (2026-03-14 08:31:35+00:00): I'll let them be. Think most of the green is shrubby/scrubby in these zones
Cheers
dp7 (2026-03-14 08:42:01+00:00): Feel free to edit the ones you think should be changed, this isn’t a personal map and I appreciate any (genuine) improvement.
Thanks
elot360 (2023-09-02 18:54:17+00:00): Co to jest "busway", istnieje w ogóle taka kategoria w OSM? W tej chwili udało się usunąć tą drogę z renderu, zupełnie jakby ona nie istniała. A przecież mogą z niej korzystać służby ratunkowe
biobuur (2024-03-02 07:29:35+00:00): Hoi mCypress1
Du bist neu bei OSM? Cool, dass du mithilfst. Kann es sein, dass du bei manchem unsicher bist, wies gemacht wird?
Kiddydom Rohrbach: aktuell gibt es auf osm den Gebäudeumriss. Du hast leisure=playground hinzugefügt. Du hast building=yes gelöscht, das gehört aber dazu. Weiter hast du ein Viereck gezeichnet und als playground getaggt. Der Zweck erschliesst sich mir nicht. Es gibt auch noch einen einsamen Punkt mit einem attraction-tagging, der scheint mir auch überzählig
Frans S (2023-09-01 08:06:54+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, you forgot to tag a highway. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140641852
Kovoschiz (2023-08-31 17:48:46+00:00): Please don't add the estate name to the `building=` . This is not the common practice, and makes the data more complicated.
HolloWorld (2023-09-01 08:07:27+00:00): From wiki "...the primary name would be the most obvious name of the feature, the one that end users expect data consumers to expose in a label or other interface element."

As to me saw few hundred building only tagging as "block 1" and the navigation app do not add the estate name to the building, I'm quite f***ed up at the end

also on mapnik it do not show both estate name and building name at same time, searching more for just because the name is separated is costing me and others life.
Kovoschiz (2023-09-01 12:15:28+00:00): 1. That isn't relevant here. If you follow by the books, you would look at `addr:housename=` . Besides, another rule is not to artificially make composite names, ie combining different features' names. 
2. It's the best option. All this does is make managing building names more complicated. 
3. Not a data problem. Carto is a static raster map background. Any proper application should have more overlays and clickable buttons.
Kovoschiz (2023-09-01 12:16:14+00:00): There are many address formats which applications may not support. Even for UK. And HK is more complicated than UK in some sense.
Kovoschiz (2023-09-01 12:21:56+00:00): 1. Any GIS or geo-database application could do a spatial join to append the `landuse=residential` `name=` to `building=`. On the contrary, you can't remove them as easily when considering button and label names, which creates clutter. Bus routes has the same problem.
MxxCon (2023-09-01 06:27:13+00:00): Hello.
I can't tell from the satellite imagery, but if that feature is supposed to be round, you can right click on it and make it into a perfect circle.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140642084
archpdx (2023-08-31 16:13:09+00:00): Hi,

Are you sure no cars are allowed to access this road? It seems that at the very least residents at 3406/3310 need to use this road to get to their driveway
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-31 16:00:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1077972627

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-31 16:00:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11159287218

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kubzon7 (2023-08-31 16:03:13+00:00): Dzięki za wskazanie niedopatrzenia, na przyszłość będę wiedział.
NorthCrab (2023-08-31 16:18:31+00:00): :-)
tolioalessandro (2023-09-05 16:15:49+00:00): Ciao Fedurli,
come ben sai la definizione di trunk è in discussione qui:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/utilizzo-del-tag-highway-trunk-in-italia/101471/

Fare mass editing declassando trunk in primary, in nome di una definizione imposta unilaterlamente alla comunità, in contrasto con tutte le altre pagine wiki e per giunta in fase di discussione, è una mancanza di rispetto nei confronti di tutti gli utenti che stanno pazientemente prendendo parte alla discussione.

Inoltre stai declassando strade nelle aree geografiche più disparate della penisola italiana. Limitati ad intervenire nelle aree che conosci personalmente.

Sei pregato di riportare le strade che hai declassato come le hai trovate, in attesa che si arrivi ad una definizione condivisa. Quello che stai facendo è un atto vandalico.

Alessandro
tolioalessandro (2023-09-05 16:17:36+00:00): Ciao Fedurli,
come ben sai la definizione di trunk è in discussione qui:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/utilizzo-del-tag-highway-trunk-in-italia/101471/

Fare mass editing declassando trunk in primary, in nome di una definizione imposta unilaterlamente alla comunità, in contrasto con tutte le altre pagine wiki e per giunta in fase di discussione, è una mancanza di rispetto nei confronti di tutti gli utenti che stanno pazientemente prendendo parte alla discussione.

Inoltre stai declassando strade nelle aree geografiche più disparate della penisola italiana. Limitati ad intervenire nelle aree che conosci personalmente.

Sei pregato di riportare le strade che hai declassato come le hai trovate, in attesa che si arrivi ad una definizione condivisa. Quello che stai facendo è un atto vandalico.

Alessandro
Supaplex030 (2023-08-31 19:42:31+00:00): Hallo, du hast den Weg hier neben der Elsenbrücke von highway=footway + bicycle=yes zu highway=path + footway/bicycle=designated geändert. Gleichzeitig ist aber auch ein Verkehrszeichen 239 + 1022-10 (Fußweg, Radfahrende frei) getaggt.

Diese beiden Informationen widersprechen sich allerdings. Gibt es an dem Weg evtl. eine neue Beschilderung oder warum hast du das Tagging geändert? Falls nicht, wäre nämlich highway=footway + bicycle=yes die richtigere Variante (ein Fußweg, für Fahrräder freigegeben).

liebe Grüße
Alex

P.S. Da du zur Zeit auch viele neue Gehwege anlegst: Kennst du schon die Berliner Wiki-Seite mit Empfehlungen zum Gehwege-Mapping? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Berlin/Verkehrswende/Gehwege - falls du dich tiefer damit beschäftigen möchtest :)
60pabXhmgwEgSC07qJU (2023-08-31 20:39:50+00:00): Hi Alex,
danke für den Hinweis, dann habe ich das falsch geändert. Bisher hatte ich eher kleinere Änderungen von Adressen/Läden usw. vorgenommen, jetzt ergänze ich auch andere Infos.
Eine Erkenntnis war, dass ein Footpath durch diese Zuweisungen (Attribute?) bei der Routenfindung anders behandelt werden kann; das war mir alles noch nicht so klar. Macht natürlich Sinn, wenn es sich um geteilte Wege handelt.
Ja, ich ergänze gerade viele Fußwege, weil nicht vorhanden und dadurch Anschlusspunkte von Fußwegen an Straßen usw. falsch gesetzt sind.
Danke für die Hinweise, ich werde mich da mehr informieren.
Supaplex030 (2023-08-31 21:16:30+00:00): Danke für deine Änderungen und Beiträge! Bei Fragen oder Unterstützungsbedarf schreib mich gerne an, oder falls du Lust hast schau gern mal auf einem der OSM-Kanäle vorbei: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Berlin#Kontakt_zur_Community

lg, Alex
kwiatek_123 (2023-08-31 21:03:51+00:00): Cześć,
Poprosiłeś o przejrzenie zmiany to zerknąłem i poprawnie usunąłeś nazwę. Jedyne co to lepiej byłoby w opisie zmiany napisać (usunięcie nazwy) to od razu bym wiedział o co chodzi.