piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
AnonNato (2023-02-22 07:39:43+00:00): - OK Next time I will add  details.
Does it have to be in English only?  Can you use Thai language?

- Usually buses stop here.
https://www.google.co.th/maps/@19.4936254,99.4749575,3a,75y,204.79h,75.57t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sQBLGWAsK3w5JMZ8UnQIYvQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
julcnx (2023-02-22 08:59:09+00:00): it's always better in English, but you can also do in Thai. e.g. "add bus stops". Note also that we are not supposed to add data directly from google :( but if you have local knowledge, you did a survey, or know about them, you can add the data.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132864176
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Mashin (2023-02-22 15:41:33+00:00): Hi!
Which router has an issue? This is typically solved on the side of the router software. Creating fake address points  only causes problems for other data users.
CyberMinion (2023-02-23 00:04:37+00:00): It is a dedicated driveway, so is that really a fake address point? The building is located between two driveways, and I attempted to differentiate which driveway is the right one.

As for which application caused my to notice the issue? Magic Earth.
ZeLonewolf (2023-02-23 17:09:27+00:00): A better practice may be to place the node close to the entrance and well-map all driveways and walkways.  Then routers should be able to make the most correct choice.  I would do that and if the router is still not behaving correctly, open a ticket with Magic Earth.  Note that many apps that do routing will have a significant delay between data changes and when it shows up in the app.  Putting the address node in the deliberately incorrect spot is bad practice for what I hope are obvious reasons.
CyberMinion (2023-02-24 04:45:51+00:00): The building already has an address point directly on the center of it. Are you proposing moving that point to the front of the building?
Unfortunately, the map doesn't telegraph the "front" vs "back" of a building, and I don't see a way to mark a driveway/parking area as dedicated to that one structure. Other than that, the map of this area seems pretty accurate, as is.
Mashin (2023-02-24 11:47:24+00:00): We don't know how does Magic Earth's routing work (might be a good thing to ask them), but typically it would try to use roads that will get you the closest to the address.

So the idea would be to move the address point that is inside the building closer to the edge that faces the correct parking lot. 

Other things that could possibly help is having the main entrance node and the parking lot area mapped. And perhaps adding a footpath from the parking lot to the entrance.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
Marych_ (2023-02-24 07:16:50+00:00): Dear UzAmateur, do you have permission from Yandex to copy data?
As far as I know - No

this is violating the license Yandex and OSM
UzAmateur (2023-02-24 08:45:46+00:00): Hello Marych, oh thank you. I thought it was free and open data. After this I never use such data ). 

Btw, do you know about Uzbek community team's link or chat for OSM?
user_5359 (2023-02-22 07:18:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use the correct keys Use addr:full instead of address (or better use the detail keys like addr:state, addr:postcode, addr:city, addr:street, addr:housenumber.

Please add the Typ of business also (office=advising_agency or office=it, I assume)
Allison P (2023-02-22 09:20:16+00:00): Nope, just SEO spam. This is a private residence.
user_18526234 (2023-02-22 09:24:50+00:00): Hello LukasJerabek,
I seems that you have added or eddited some landuse=village_green. Please read:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=village_green
Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
Please read:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=greenery
For a list of alternative tags.

The object in question is:
https://www.osm.org/way/364401194

Greetings Tjuro
Kovoschiz (2023-02-22 13:14:58+00:00): No, they aren't non-existent. Default speeds should still be confirmed.
Frans S (2023-02-23 14:43:07+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator,during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. therefore, I inform you  about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Each building need to be squared.
Nodes of buildings may not connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132865692
Frans S (2023-02-23 14:43:37+00:00): Hello. 
About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Please adjust wrong positioned buildings as well
This video shows how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132865692
Dimacn (2023-02-23 16:51:48+00:00): Зачем вы сделали две улицы Пушкина? Зачем вы портите карту?
Грачевский муниципальный округ (2023-02-27 08:35:44+00:00): Как удалить одну улицу
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
kubahahaha (2023-02-22 17:03:52+00:00): Te kategorie to niechcący zostały zmienione?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3570211
taxi301 (2023-02-23 07:12:36+00:00): tak , poprawiłem
liums (2026-03-01 22:09:41+00:00): Salut, est ce que cet arrêt de bus https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9274374661 est volontairement placé ici ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
Herman Lee (2023-11-16 09:37:09+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144086380
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-22 09:00:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2704782344
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448280541

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
Frans S (2023-02-23 09:13:44+00:00): Hello again. Sorry to say, but these mappings are also not in line with the quality HOTOSM stands for.
See my comments on your other changeset.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132867043
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
javbw (2023-04-07 13:31:57+00:00): The drawn sidewalks are not good. 
The sidewalks are disconnected. 
bridges are not added to the ways. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148429941#map=17/35.63367/139.43940

The ways are disconnected at the ends, so no one can use the sidewalks.

The bridge is not added either. 

The sidewalks need to be connected to the roads, or the routing programs cannot connect to them, so the sidewalks are useless.

I mentioned this to you years ago, but you have not fixed your mapping, so I assume many of the sidewalks in your 4000 edits will have to be repaired by other people. 

OSM is not a painting program. 

*** Please read the wiki on how to map sidewalks! ***
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
empty_child (2023-02-22 11:46:09+00:00): AlexEvst, добрый день
Спасибо за вклад в проект
Пожалуйста, не добавляйте избыточное описание точки интереса в названии ("Modus Строительный супермаркет", строительный супермаркет не имеет смысла, shop=hardware уже описывает суть данного объекта. Как альтернативу, можно использовать тег shop=doityourself)
По поводу Level One (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10685195505). Это действительно магазин видеоигр, или это игровой клуб? Если второе, лучше использовать leisure=amusement_arcade
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-22 08:40:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/211012101
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106780840
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530244382

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
DomenicoCacace (2023-02-22 11:30:01+00:00): Buongiorno, il tag "name=." per il picco montuoso è voluto? 
In caso il picco non avesse un nome vi consiglio di usare piuttosto il tag "noname=yes".
CAI Stabia (2023-02-22 12:51:27+00:00): Ciao quiet, si il picco è un punto cospicuo senza nome segnato sia sulle  tavolette IGM che sulla Carta dei sentieri CAI dei Monti Lattari.
Sinceramente non conoscevo l'esistenza del tag noname, ti ringrazio per la info. Non lo trovo però associato alla combinazione natural=peak: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dpeak
Grazie comunque per la segnalazione.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-22 08:56:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/693282063
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/693282081

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Piotr Strębski (2023-02-23 07:38:20+00:00): Tak jest w rzeczywistości, oba budynki mają przywieszoną taką samą tabliczkę adresową. Osobiście sprawdzone ;-)
NorthCrab (2023-02-23 07:41:20+00:00): No to chyba można zignorować ten problem. Nie widzę za bardzo innego wyjścia, a automatyczne odrzucanie takich przypadków nie jest chyba możliwe.
Dindia (2026-02-15 21:50:43+00:00): It's not forbidden to walk on the shoulders of these roads. Only forbidden to walk on roads marked with blue (1,2,20, etc)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:12:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-03-06 20:25:12+00:00): porque criou esta via? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148437094/history aqui não tem nada
Raphaelkaart (2023-03-07 19:54:09+00:00): Boa Tarde Erick. 

Deletei essa via, poderia ser um caminho pedonal, pois na camada de nomes de Ruas existe essa Rua ou Caminho. 

Att;

Raphaelkaart
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-03-07 19:58:49+00:00): Pedonal? Tu é de Portugal?
eggie (2023-02-22 09:33:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-02-22 09:42:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
streckenkundler (2023-02-22 17:24:24+00:00): Hei,

eine große Bitte habe ich: versuche bitte hier in Brandenburg entweder vorzugsweise Esri zu verwenden (diese sind weitestgehend gleich der Luftbilder des LGB) oder gleich die LGB-Luftbilder in iD als benutzerdefinierte Kartenebene einzubinden. Die LGB-Daten sind OSM-Nutzbar, qualitativ und lagemäßig hier bedeutend besser. Alle direkt vom LGB angebotenen Dienste sind nutzbar: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brandenburg/Geoportal

Ich hab mein Bing-Problem hier in Brandenburg auch bereits im neuen Forum thematisiert: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vorsicht-bei-verwendung-von-bing-luftbildern-im-land-brandenburg/8591

Danke,

Sven
Thommse (2023-02-22 20:17:25+00:00): Hi Sven,

dann hat iD etwas voreilig Bing als Quelle betrachtet. Ich arbeite nach den aktuellen LGB-Bildern vom Sommer 2022. Meine Bearbeitung gerade im Norosten des Solarparks Klettwitz Nord waren durchaus richtig, insbesondere im Bereich der (ich nenne sie mal) Wasserstelle. Worin siehst du denn das Problem meiner Anpassung.  Es stellt sich doch generell die Frage: Wie objektscharf soll der Solarpark abgebildet werden? Entlang der Zäune, die den Solarpark eindeutig eingrenzen, oder einfach eine beliebige frei gedachte Fläche. Ich habe bewusst den Zaun als Grenze genommen, weil nunmal "biotop"-mäßig zu betrachtende Flächen nicht zum Solarpark gehören.  Wo ist also das Problem?

Beste Grüße
Thomas
streckenkundler (2023-02-23 08:28:25+00:00): Hei,

Ah... Ich hab nur Bing im sorce gesehen, mehr nicht, da dachte ich... 

Dann ist alles gut... 

Es ist was im Gange, daß die LGB-Luftbilder in Brandenburg standardmäßig zu erst angeboten werden...

Viele Grüße,

Sven
Herman Lee (2023-11-16 09:36:51+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144086380
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-04-01 16:53:28+00:00): esta rua existe? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148448904
Baconcrisp (2024-04-01 18:50:19+00:00): Hello erickdeoliveiraleal,

This editors account is currently inactive so I looked into your question on their behalf. I agree that this way doesn't exist so I removed it!

Thank you for bringing this to our attention!

Baconcrisp
sdicke (2023-02-22 09:39:57+00:00): source=aeerial_imagery;osm_notes
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 13:52:24+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132871085
chimel38 (2023-07-08 14:43:46+00:00): Bonjour,
Ce changesets pose problèmes 
Avec l'adresse Route de Massié alors que ce bâtiment est situé sur autre voie (route nationale 85) 
Bâtiment religieux n'est pas approprié il existe des tag appropriés (voir le wiki  lieu de culte) par exemple pour une mosquée 2 clefs sont nécessaires amenity=place_of_worship
religion=mulsim
Et si ce lieu de culte l'indiquer avec name= xxxxx
Restant à votre service
Harfeur (2023-03-02 08:01:02+00:00): Dans le cas d'un parc ou de tout autre objet coupé en deux, il est possible d'utiliser une relation pour signaler que ces deux objets représentent la même chose.

Par exemple : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12886612
vnourdin (2023-03-02 09:18:48+00:00): C'est fait : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133203055 
Est-ce pertinent d'inclure aussi dedans le chemin piéton qui a le même nom ?
VLD549 (2023-05-14 12:53:23+00:00): Hi,

The change is correct, but shouldn't the blue line be put more neatly? (I'm not a mapper, just asking).
Thank you!
Carto'Cité (2023-04-17 14:48:45+00:00): Bonjour Ephtolens,
Je me permets de te contacter pour savoir si tu es passé récemment dans ce secteur car je me demande s'il n'y a pas un doublon avec ces 2 aménagements :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175969204
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/646930812
Il y aurait à la fois une voie verte à double sens plus un double sens cyclable ce qui m'étonne un peu même si c'est possible.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
Roue-doudou (2023-04-17 15:34:00+00:00): J'ai tagué avec l'aide de ces photos de l'asso Sabine dans ce thread: https://twitter.com/SabineRouenVelo/status/1628318399250984962
Roue-doudou (2023-04-17 15:35:44+00:00): Ah en effet je viens de me rendre compte de ce qui ne vas pas ! Merci !
Je corrige en elevant l'opposite
Carto'Cité (2023-04-17 15:44:23+00:00): Merci beaucoup pour ton retour !
Très utiles toutes ces photos en effet.
Charles
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-02-26 15:15:32+00:00): tag mistake on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148457289
SekeRob (2023-02-23 09:19:12+00:00): Hi,

a few corrections posted in CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132915112

1) repair park boundary. Watch for integrity of relations, bus routes, parks, city outlines etc
2) remove name from roundabout, only names specific to the rotatoria area apply. Some have a name of their own, but most don't.
3) added give_way spots.

happy mapping
andrei_ptk (2023-02-23 15:28:46+00:00): Hello
Thank you for your advices, I will be more attentive.
You are doing a really good job.
Best regards
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-03-01 23:57:01+00:00): Du har hægtet et område sammen med en højspændingledning:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10685488123
Hsonesson (2023-03-02 09:50:52+00:00): Ups. Det havde jeg ikke bemærket. Det er fikset nu. Tak for besked!
marczoutendijk (2023-11-15 19:44:34+00:00): Building=r???
What do you mean by that?
Galbinus (2023-11-15 20:06:57+00:00): Im mean nothing by this, it is a mistake.
empty_child (2023-02-22 11:40:01+00:00): dmitry-skitaletc, день добрый
Спасибо за вклад в проект. 
Чуть подскажу по изменению. В OSM есть выделенный тег для коворков, office=coworking. И адрес мы указываем не на русском и не на английском. addr:street=ვახტანგ გორგასალის ქუჩა, addr:city=ბათუმი
gscscnd (2023-02-22 14:35:28+00:00): Do poprawy jeszcze tag brand:wikipedia.
tanonin (2023-06-02 19:44:25+00:00): Concernant le point culminant (/node/10685546353) il semblerait que en regardant les courbes de niveau que l'altitude soit plus élevée du coté de 49.9622N 4.4346E
Leyman M (2023-06-04 17:17:17+00:00): En effet, la couche MNT de la Région wallonne confirme votre position, qui est à 364  met des poussières. J'ai déplacé le point.
eggie (2023-02-22 11:59:31+00:00): Welkom bij OSM..
Alleen een naam zal niets doen in osm. Ook de aard van het bedrijf vermelden.
Bv office=it
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2023-02-22 12:00:48+00:00): Svp ook de aard van het bedrijf vermelden.
Mvg
eggie
gscholz (2023-02-28 07:42:06+00:00): Hi evgenykatyshev,
your recent edits have left behind a lot of errors regarding not connected ways (red dots):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=28.68448&lat=38.54706&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132875559

As you may know, this ways can not be used by routing software . Can you please fix this? As this seems to be a systematical error, can you please check how to avoid this in future? Hint: Have a look at the warnings this changeset shows.

Kind regards
Guido
Devdatta (2023-02-23 12:18:14+00:00): Hi, Any reason that you have marked this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106130080
as under-construction? This road has been opened on monday, and I have been using it every day
map per (2023-02-22 15:24:44+00:00): Wegen "Meine Änderungen überprüfen": Sieht fast alles gut aus, danke!

(Hab noch die cuisine Angabe zu 'israeli' eingeenglischt und die ',' in den Öffnungszeiten durch ';' ersetzt)

Viele Grüße
map per
Langlaeufer (2023-02-22 15:11:51+00:00): Der Gehweg war schon als Attribut erfasst:
sidewalk=both. Ich sehe hier auch keinen Vorteil in der separaten Erfassung.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132875889
gscholz (2023-02-28 07:42:43+00:00): Hi evgenykatyshev,
your recent edits have left behind a lot of errors regarding not connected ways (red dots):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=28.68448&lat=38.54706&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132875914

As you may know, this ways can not be used by routing software . Can you please fix this? As this seems to be a systematical error, can you please check how to avoid this in future? Hint: Have a look at the warnings this changeset shows.

Kind regards
Guido
evgenykatyshev (2023-02-28 18:24:39+00:00): Hi gscholz. Thank you for drawing my attention to these errors. I relied on built-in validator of RapiD, but I see that I've missed a lot of mistakes. I'll fix it soon myself.
user_5359 (2023-07-08 06:00:52+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/node/9801000849/history. What is the mean of the key name_en. What is the difference to name:en?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-22 14:42:59+00:00): are you sure there is also sidewalk inside roundabout?

Or is it only on outside side of roundabout?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556937738 - sidewalk=both claims that there is also sidewalk inside roundabout
gmar5 (2023-02-22 14:48:02+00:00): What do you mean by "inside"? "sideway=both" means on both sides of the street (left and right), which is the case here: the sidewalk goes around the roundabout on both sides. Have I got this wrong?
gmar5 (2023-02-22 14:48:58+00:00): Oh, I see what you mean now! Sorry. I was thinking of the roundabout mapped as a node. You are right, I will fix it.
gmar5 (2023-02-22 14:55:05+00:00): (Sorry for the numbers of comments). Thinking about it, I think it will be more appropriate to map this as a mini-roundabout on a node, instead of the full loop.
Frans S (2023-04-06 08:27:57+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please follow the rules how to tag highways,
Here, in the middle of nowhere, no buildings, you tag them as a residential highway. Please connect also the roads together.
 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway -
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132877101
kiraedam (2023-04-07 07:56:31+00:00): Hello Frans S,

We appreciate your review of our changeset and the correction made to the edit. We sincerely apologize for adding an incorrect highway tag. Rest assured, we will take steps to avoid repeating such errors in the future. Thank you for fixing the issue, and we eagerly anticipate learning more from you. Thank you once again!

Regards,
kiraedam