piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rempshaener (2026-01-16 19:36:41+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Eine einfaches Kompaktstation ist noch kein Gebäude.
Nähere Details findest du hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:power%3Dsubstation#Beispiele
In deinem Fall wäre das
man_made=street_cabinet
utility=power
power=substation
substation=minor_distribution
Heißt: alles andere wieder raus und das Vorstehende rein.
Noch ein Tipp: Man kann Objekte rechtwinklig machen, indem man im Editor „Q“ drückt.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
silversurfer83 (2026-01-16 15:59:28+00:00): Hi :)

I don't think this worked as intended.

Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Disland carefully and try again.

If neccessary, please reach out for help. Theres always people at c.osm.org or in chat groups like those on Signal

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177294139
Vinber (2026-01-17 11:46:46+00:00): doublon de https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12788904365

pas d'attributs

la discussion a repris https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/votre-avis-sur-un-contributeur-votre-solution-de-visibilite-digitale-locale/10638/62

au regard du rythme, un bot ?

signalé pour faire cesser
literan (2026-01-17 09:31:25+00:00): прошу, если не сложно, попутно перед знаком № ставить пробел (в идеале - неразрывный, но хоть обычный)
Yurii_l (2026-01-19 09:30:55+00:00): Хорошо
gigi2037 (2026-01-16 11:56:27+00:00): Dalla cartina del regione Campania 
https://www.campania.info/wp-content/uploads/sites/111/mappa-metro-napoli.pdf
thebrad1111 (2026-01-25 11:51:45+00:00): Whereabouts are the concrete slabs here? 

The change here currently suggests these roads no longer exist at all, which I assume you did not intend.
yelisey90 (2026-01-16 12:57:14+00:00): layer=-1? why?
Jk488 (2026-01-16 13:09:55+00:00): A part of the sidewalk is under this building: way/1157739014
yelisey90 (2026-01-16 18:50:10+00:00): That doesn't mean that the whole path should be mapped as underground (layer=-1 means pretty much the same as something directly underground; something on the surface is the implicit level=0).
The correct solution will be to cut the sidewalk at the points where it intersects the particular building and add covered=yes to that part of the sidewalk that is under the roof; in addition, that part of the building (but not the whole building) that overhangs the sidewalk should be tagged as layer=1.
Jk488 (2026-01-16 20:06:37+00:00): This part is actually a roof, it should be fixed now. Thanks for the feedback
eggie (2026-01-16 14:09:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:32:02+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13460262187 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dentist in Pendleton Indiana"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 08:57:54+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177672927
(No visible changes after review)
woodpeck_repair (2026-01-16 12:56:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177297548 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:32:05+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13459262418 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Desarrollador de sitios web en Venezuela"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Desarrollador de sitios web en Venezuela"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 08:57:54+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177672928
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-16 12:51:22+00:00): Hi Balthazard1020, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 12 addr(s)
- 34 building(s)
- 15 landuse(s)
- 6 natural(s)
- 89 source(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177297200
woodpeck_repair (2026-01-16 12:56:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177297548 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2026-01-16 12:56:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177297548 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2026-01-16 12:56:12+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 177297018, 177297200, 177297317, 177297324, 177297348, 177297475, 177297504.
Badojo (2026-01-16 16:10:43+00:00): Bok,
ne koristi se oznaka planned nego proposed kao što je i već bilo
Yog Sot (2026-01-16 22:12:34+00:00): to jest pieśń przyszłości. 
Mapujemy coś, że jest planowane jak faktycznie pojawi się projekt konkretnej inwestycji, a nie możliwośc jej realizacji miejscowym planem.
eggie (2026-01-16 14:15:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Hier is el heel erg veel schade ontstaan. 
Wanneer je bomen wil toevoegen kun je het beste in de wiki kijken.
Bomen natural=tree  krijgen geen naam, maar een species=  met latijnse naam en species:nl= met de Nederlandse naam. Niet name= gebruiken. 
Verder heb je veel landuse en water aangepast en dat rendert nu niet meer.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=177297696
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-01-16 14:22:21+00:00): reverted by changeset #177300637

Je edits zijn teruggedraaid. 
Kijk in de wiki hoe bomen te mappen.
Ga svp niet het hele landschap veranderen. Je had van alles verwijderd. Wat was je bedoeling hier?

MVG
eggie
Boetelerbos (2026-01-16 14:31:00+00:00): euh sorry Eggie maar het is mijn eigen land en ik wil graag mijn eigen bomen met gps erin zetten...
eggie (2026-01-16 14:40:02+00:00): Oke, maar eigenaar van de bomen en het land maakt je nog geen eigenaar van de kaart.

Je bomen heb ik teruggezet.
De rest van de schade is hersteld.
Kijk in de wiki hoe bomen te taggen.

Mapse,
eggie
Boetelerbos (2026-01-16 14:40:16+00:00): alle lijnen die verwijdert zijn door mij zijn lijnen die gewoon niet kloppen. gras land daar over de weg , water lijnen waar geen water is dus ik denk dat ik er wel kijk op heb...
eggie (2026-01-16 14:44:20+00:00): Ik heb name aangepast naar species:nl
Alle bomen, maar ook heesters worden getagd met natural=tree
name= alleen gebruiken als een boom ook werkelijk een eigennaam heeft en dat zijn er niet zoveel.
Je hoort dus niet de soort als naam te zien staan. Dat zit nu in species:nl

species gebruiken voor de latijnse namen. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2026-01-16 14:45:37+00:00): wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree
eggie (2026-01-16 14:51:25+00:00): Kijk eens hier wat je hebt gedaan
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=177297696
Het resultaat was dat niets meer renderde op de kaart.
Ik kijk met een recente foto.
eggie (2026-01-16 14:58:50+00:00): Dag supr  Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.
MVG
eggie
Negreheb (2026-01-16 17:46:21+00:00): Hey, warum hast du denn bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1462110928 das amenity=healthcare gelöscht? 

Und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2447371500 - erstens sieht das passend aus und ich sehe keinen Grund dafür, das zu trennen und zweitens denke ich, dass das eher eine Diskussion im Forum sein sollte und nicht notes bei einem Punkt.
mobileGEO (2026-01-18 02:18:32+00:00): zu 1462110928 - Vorteile:
Vorteile:
Präzise Querybarkeit für Data-Consumers (Healthsites.io, Carto)
Cleanup: Redundanz weg, Tag-Churn ↓
wird durch
health_facility:type=rehabilitation
healthcare=rehabilitation

schon gut abgebildet und entlastet das fac totum amenity=* ein wenig.
Genau so wie bei den Bildungszentren, wo education=* auch langsam amenity=* ersetzt.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-03 14:56:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 185044755, 185044712, 185044792, 185043031, 185044858, 185044854, 185044726, 185044802, 185044684, 185044693, 185043064, 185044766, 185044834, 185044779, 185043050, 185044776, 185043074, 185043054, 185044732, 185043091, 185044704, 185044746, 185044715, 185043085, 185044894, 185044810, 185044795, 185044765, 185044862, 185043059, 185044750, 185044758, 185043076, 185044812, 185044785, 185043015, 185043039, 185044823, 185044748, 185044738, 185044744, 185044734, 185044845, 185044702, 185044835, 185044888, 185044873, 185044731, 185044879, 185044817, 185044827, 185044789, 185044865, 185044720, 185044843, 185043045, 185044839, 185044849, 185044771, 185044694, 185044768, 185044707, 185043066 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy imports in Ivory Coast
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-03 14:56:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 185044755, 185044712, 185044792, 185043031, 185044858, 185044854, 185044726, 185044802, 185044684, 185044693, 185043064, 185044766, 185044834, 185044779, 185043050, 185044776, 185043074, 185043054, 185044732, 185043091, 185044704, 185044746, 185044715, 185043085, 185044894, 185044810, 185044795, 185044765, 185044862, 185043059, 185044750, 185044758, 185043076, 185044812, 185044785, 185043015, 185043039, 185044823, 185044748, 185044738, 185044744, 185044734, 185044845, 185044702, 185044835, 185044888, 185044873, 185044731, 185044879, 185044817, 185044827, 185044789, 185044865, 185044720, 185044843, 185043045, 185044839, 185044849, 185044771, 185044694, 185044768, 185044707, 185043066 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy imports in Ivory Coast
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-03 14:55:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 185044755, 185044712, 185044792, 185043031, 185044858, 185044854, 185044726, 185044802, 185044684, 185044693, 185043064, 185044766, 185044834, 185044779, 185043050, 185044776, 185043074, 185043054, 185044732, 185043091, 185044704, 185044746, 185044715, 185043085, 185044894, 185044810, 185044795, 185044765, 185044862, 185043059, 185044750, 185044758, 185043076, 185044812, 185044785, 185043015, 185043039, 185044823, 185044748, 185044738, 185044744, 185044734, 185044845, 185044702, 185044835, 185044888, 185044873, 185044731, 185044879, 185044817, 185044827, 185044789, 185044865, 185044720, 185044843, 185043045, 185044839, 185044849, 185044771, 185044694, 185044768, 185044707, 185043066 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy imports in Ivory Coast
Negreheb (2026-01-16 17:42:01+00:00): Hey, warum hast du nicht einfach die ganzen Werte von vorher (Version 4 vom Weg) wieder reingepackt? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1202457562/history/4
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-01-16 19:42:17+00:00): Merhaba. Değişikliğinizi geri aldım. Çok yakın tarihli uydu görüntülerinde de bulunan hastane binalarını silmişsiniz(eğer sildiğiniz binalar artık gerçekten mevcut değilse lütfen buraya yorum yazarak bildiriniz.) Hastaneler zaten ekli olmasına rağmen yeniden eklemişsiniz, fazladan eklediğiniz düğümleri de sildim. 

Örneğin node/13460356830 'u eklemişsiniz. Fakat Urla Devlet Hastanesi zaten daha önceden eklenmiş (way/1279579048). Aynı husus Biga Devlet Hastanesi için de geçerliydi.

Ayrıca lütfen değişiklik açıklamalarınızda değişikliğinizi kısaca özetleyiniz. "Ülke Çapı Değişimler..." ifadenizden neyi neden değiştirdiğiniz anlaşılmıyor. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

İyi günler.
Supaplex (2026-01-16 15:02:07+00:00): 臺南市中西區中正路108巷10號 蝸居.小鴨慢慢
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177298627
NeisBot (2026-01-16 13:36:17+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 374 of your last 374 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23690632
JezCrow (2026-01-16 20:25:38+00:00): These roads did have the correct names before you changed them, so I have reverted this changeset.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177314844
trigpoint (2026-02-13 16:14:24+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/178508313
Frans S (2026-02-01 14:29:56+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Tag buildings as 'building=yes' This is default for HOTOSM projects.
You cannot decide from a satellite image what the purpose is of a building. Leave that to local mappers.
Norbert Dichter (2026-02-09 14:43:55+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177299380
Heideammer (2026-02-27 08:43:58+00:00): Ich vermute, dass Du beim Hochladen dieses Änderungssatzes das Flussbett der Böhme (natural=riverbank) gelöscht hast. Hier sieht man die Lücke: https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=52.877774&mlon=9.609078#map=17/52.877772/9.609078

Lässt sich das wiederherstellen?
Viele Grüße Heideammer
Ropino (2026-02-27 09:03:19+00:00): Hallo,
danke für den Hinweis.
Ist wieder hergestellt.
DrSegatron (2026-01-17 16:42:40+00:00): Google is not a valid source for OSM.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F

Reverted in #177343455
Hidoo00 (2026-01-18 07:44:56+00:00): Tips! Du kan söka upp om skylten finns med som en föreskrift på https://rdt.transportstyrelsen.se/rdt/AF06_Search.aspx?UseStfs=1 och ändra OSM därefter!
T med ett g (2026-01-19 15:26:23+00:00): Tack för länkar och info! Hade inte koll på det. Ska man lista sina källor så noggrant som: "Enligt föreskrift 1980 2008-00365 och 1980 2014-00092" Eller är det nog att säga att man kollat upp det?
Hidoo00 (2026-01-19 15:30:48+00:00): Inte superpetigt, det räcker med typ "according to local laws" eller "Transportstyrelsen RDT" eller liknande. Det viktiga med källhänvisningen/ändringskommentaren är för att kunna upptäcka när upphovsrättsskyddade källor använts, som i det här fallet, annars är det ganska löst med riktlinjer!
eggie (2026-01-16 14:25:38+00:00): Dag Sirolv  Nieuw bouw kun je laten importeren via het forum van OSM middels het draadje BAG importverzoeken.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-16 14:30:56+00:00): Gebouw uitgelijnd conform BAG
JezCrow (2026-01-16 19:42:12+00:00): OpenStreetMap is for real-world changes. If you want to build your own towns on a map then OpenGeofiction is the place for that https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenGeofiction

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177313645
trigpoint (2026-02-13 16:16:05+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/178508313
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-19 06:35:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1221533257

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
coatix (2026-06-08 17:55:14+00:00): did you maybe mean to add ref:id3king = "1113" instead of ref: = "id3king=1113" ?

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/ref:#values
bigpaolo (2026-06-08 18:29:10+00:00): id3king1113 is the name of the path
ivanbranco (2026-06-08 19:22:07+00:00): @coatix: see also: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177323942

What's ironic is that the references website uses... Google Maps... https://www.id3king.it/Uscite/U2023/Uscita1113/indice_1113.htm
coatix (2026-06-09 04:26:53+00:00): @ivanbranco thanks for the ping.

so the key should be "ref:id3king" and the value should be "1113" then?
bigpaolo (2026-06-09 06:30:21+00:00): I'm not very good, but I think so
Frans S (2026-01-16 15:26:16+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------

Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping. 
C: Collected adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.

E: Buildings not squared or rounded.
G: Included the shadow of the building.

Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177301099
Frans S (2026-01-16 15:34:15+00:00): Please check this footage where you can see which adjustments I had to make. (just a couple as an example)
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=177303428
Please strengthen your mapping skills.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177301099
Sébastien Pi (2026-02-17 22:52:31+00:00): La relation 10-5 utilisait https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37615974 qui est une voie privée(en plus avec barrière physique) et non celle parallèle à gauche.
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-16 14:43:50+00:00): Level0 bug brokes https://osm.org/way/363481639 :(
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-16 14:47:09+00:00): Fixed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177301696
Frans S (2026-04-06 13:39:59+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------

A: Inaccurate mapping. 
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.


G: Included the shadow of the building.

Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177301824
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:32:09+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13460562757 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Drive-thru coffee shop in Ramallah"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 08:57:55+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177672929
(No visible changes after review)
eggie (2026-01-16 15:26:21+00:00): Dag Gerrald 
Mooi,.. 
Het is weer actueel. Ik heb de landuse aangepast zodat niet een andere mapper het weer gaat aanpassen. Maxspeed 50 heb ik ook van de oversteken verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
Dimitar155 (2026-01-16 18:39:59+00:00): Какво трябва да е работното време на този обект?
Paweł_M (2026-01-16 15:07:39+00:00): Zapomniałem dopisać w opisie zestawu zmian. Dodałem też trochę zagospodarowania terenu w okolicy i kilka budynków.
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:32:11+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13460583996 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Math tutoring service for students"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-25 08:57:55+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/177418972
LudovicG (2026-01-19 17:38:35+00:00): Merci pour votre contribution.
Cependant la "ref" devrait respecter le motif A9A9A9. Est-ce que la ref était illisible et vous n'avez pu lire que le dernier caractère ?
D'après dataNOVA (opendata de la Poste), ça devrait être A1I1F8. Avez-vous l'occasion d'y repasser ?
Toniob (2026-01-22 15:16:19+00:00): Je vais essayer d’y passer ce weekend pour vérifier.
LudovicG (2026-01-23 17:56:11+00:00): Merci :)
Au passage, si vous pouvez relever le nombre de fentes (1 ou 2) et le type (accrochée au mur, sur un poteau ou meuble urbain entier (contient un relais postal)).
Toniob (2026-01-27 18:10:19+00:00): Il s’agit d’une boîte à une seule fente, accrochée sur un mur. Pour la ref, elle n’est pas indiquée comme elle devrait à priori. J’ai vraiment juste "8" indiqué sur la boîte : https://cloud.6clones.net/s/L5ZjkeS7GbrCf5K
LudovicG (2026-01-28 13:02:17+00:00): Merci beaucoup.
J'ai ajouté le type et le nb de fentes selon vos indications.
Pour la ref, effectivement c'est bizarre. On retrouve juste le dernier caractère du A1I1F8.
Je vais tenter de contacter quelqu'un côté Poste.
norgis (2026-01-17 07:35:56+00:00): Hei,
I og med at stien fysisk eksisterer, så skal den ligge inn i OSM, men man markerer at det er privat med bruk av tagen "access=private". Stier skal ikke slettes fordi man ikke ønsker dem synlig i kartet, men ruting osv. vil hensynta at de ikke kan brukes av allmennheten ved access=private