piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
s777n (2025-02-06 11:23:56+00:00): В рамках OpensStreetMap это не имя:

"Здесь также не следует доводить ситуацию до абсурда и копировать всё в name=. Например, содержимое таблички ПАО "МОЭСК" ПС №123 110/10 кВ "Ивановская" следует разнести по тегам operator=ПАО "МОЭСК"power=substationref=123voltage=110000;10000name=Ивановская.

Аналогичные вопросы часто вызывает наличие в каких-то официальных списках графы "Наименование", в которую попадают не только имена собственные, но и слова-категории или техническая информация. Следует понимать, что в OSM понятие названия более строгое, чем в разного рода документации, где нет необходимости различать части названия. Кроме того, чаще всего существуют документы, где один и тот же объект упоминается по-разному.

Аргументация отдельных пользователей, состоящая в том, что стиль Standard по умолчанию отображает какие-либо объекты "непонятно" или что без заполнения имени чем-либо объекты невозможно найти в навигаторе, является неприемлемой. Данное правило проекта служит вполне определённым практическим целям и не должно нарушаться по чьей-либо прихоти. Внесение таких псевдоназваний квалифицируется как обозначение под рендер."

Из Вики: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия#Не_подходите_к_названиям_формально[1]
s777n (2025-02-06 11:27:22+00:00): Отметил как маршрут. Так же как отмечаются разные трассы. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Relation:route

Автомобильная дорога от дороги с идентификационным номером 11253000ОПМП-09 до здания больницы: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18659765
NeisBot (2025-02-04 11:48:41+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

https://osm.org/way/1356649009

#NameCheck #NeisLab
s777n (2025-02-05 09:11:42+00:00): Откатил вашу правку. Вы зачем-то удалили дорогу и продублировали часть дороги около памятника Юнгам. И не соединили вашу дорогу с тропинками. И ЭАвтомобильная дорога от перекрестка у памятника Юнгам до развилки у Сухого дока" не стоит добавлять в имена

Пешеходную дорогу на автомобильную я исправил.
УИРиМХ (2025-02-05 11:02:24+00:00): Добрый день! Я являюсь представителем владельца дороги. Данные о названии, конфигурации и прочие технические данные взяты из официальных документов. (Данная дорога поставлена на кадастровый учет).
s777n (2025-02-06 11:29:57+00:00): Отметил как маршрут. Так же как отмечаются разные трассы. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Relation:route

Автомобильная дорога от перекрестка у памятника Юнгам до развилки у Сухого дока https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18659834
Osmwithspace (2025-02-06 13:55:35+00:00): Bitte ändere in so einem Fall auch brand und brand:wikidata.
Ich hab es geändert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162209681
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162122172
silversurfer83 (2025-02-04 20:49:54+00:00): Hi there :)

are you sure about the "motor_vehicel=designated" tags here?

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162122489
domiden (2025-02-05 19:59:09+00:00): If you were to pass by, you would see a building passageway marked with the traffic sign 'Feuerwehrzufahrt'. The last part of the line looks like a normal footpath, but from the street to the end of the building passage, the path is wide enough for fire engines to pass. However, its main purpose is to provide access to buildings 3a–c on foot or by bicycle.
silversurfer83 (2025-02-05 20:38:29+00:00): Ah. I see. I guess you're looking for the emergency tag.
Try here: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Ddesignated
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Demergency_access

Also you might wish to read 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
s777n (2025-02-05 09:17:24+00:00): Пожалуйтса, будьте внимательней. Вы добавили или колонку или колодец в нарисованную вами дорогу. Поправил.

Удалил имя с дороги.
s777n (2025-02-06 11:31:00+00:00): Отметил как маршрут. Так же как отмечаются разные трассы. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Relation:route

Автомобильная дорога от дороги с идентификационным номером 11253000ОПМП-15 вдоль группы домов №№17-21 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18659885
Viima (2025-10-16 17:05:37+00:00): Hei! Tervetuloa Openstreetmapiin.

Muokkaamasi tie ei tietojesi perusteella sovi moottoriajoneuvoille. Tällaisten tietojen määrittely tielle on suorastaan toivottavaa, mutta nyt kävi niin, että asetit tielle moottoriajoneuvokiellon.

Moottoriajoneuvolla ajon laillisuudella ei ole tekemistä ajoon sopivuuden kanssa, joten peruutin muutoksiasi. Moottoriajoneuvoja on joka lähtöön aina formula-autosta mönkijään, joten määritelmä "moottoriajoneuvoille soveltumaton tie" ei ole yksiselitteinen.

Ohjeita kartoittamiseen saat Openstreetmapin wikistä. Tervetuloa myös suomenkieliselle keskustelufoorumille.

wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fi:Aloittelijan_opas

community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/fi/67

Ystävällisin terveisin
Viima
s777n (2025-02-05 09:30:02+00:00): Откатил вашу правку. Вы удалили часть улицы Каовалева и то что вы добавили взамен вы не соединили с остальной улицей. И Добавили неправильное имя. Вместо "улица Ковалёва" вы добавили "Автомобильная дорога по ул. Ковалева"
УИРиМХ (2025-02-05 11:06:31+00:00): Было указано официальное наименование дороги и ее конфигурация согласно выписке из ЕГРН.
jlz93 (2026-07-30 21:37:09+00:00): Wollte vor 2 Jahren diesen Pfad auch "finden", allerdings vergebens. Werde in ca. 1 Woche nochmal von Süden aus probieren ihn zu gehen. Falls er aber nicht mehr existiert bzw. schon zur unerkenntlichkeit zugewuchtert ist, werde ich ihn hier entfernen.
Taya_S (2025-02-05 08:13:10+00:00): Reverted SEO spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162154805
silversurfer83 (2025-02-04 20:52:48+00:00): Hi again :)

VZ250 translates to "vehicle=no" in OSM. Are there any additional signs below the 250?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162123552
domiden (2025-02-05 20:06:35+00:00): Yes, there is an additional sign underneath: "Ausgenommen DRK-Mitarbeiter". I don't know how to handle this non-standard sign. Feel free to edit it.
凱富 范 (2025-02-04 18:32:46+00:00): 請問一下這個是什麼？
Edison Wen (2025-02-05 12:31:49+00:00): 我根據建築設施類別更新了建築類別

I updated the building category based on the building facility category.
Sakari_N (2025-02-05 18:17:47+00:00): In my opinion this should be reverted. Right value for building= can't be sourced from the amenity= tag, if this was possible there would be no need for two different tags.

Source=survey is also questionable, did you travel to Paraguay, Faroe Islands, Papua New Guinea etc to make this changeset?
Lumikeiju (2025-02-05 20:09:53+00:00): I appreciate the initiative to find instances of `building=yes` that can likely be updated based on their POI type, but please individually review these changes using aerial or street-level imagery to make sure that they are correct.

As @Sakari_N correctly points out, it is not always the case that a POI is at a building which was originally constructed in the design of that POI type.

Please also keep changesets localized (rather than scattered around the world)! This makes things easier for others to understand and review your changes.

I suggest also using a different editor (such as iD or Rapid) for these types of changes, as to not unintentionally mislead others when SCEE automatically adds the `source=survey` tag to your changesets.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-06 03:36:25+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162190532

please, use StreetComplete and SCEE for survey only - not for dubious guessing (I am asking as contributor to StreetComplete development)
Edison Wen (2025-02-06 15:17:10+00:00): Thank you for your reminder, I will pay more attention next time
archie (2025-02-04 12:43:13+00:00): Hej, är det här fråga om en "laxtrappa" eller liknande? Fundera om du kan sätta taggen "waterway=fish_pass" på den här delen av vattendraget.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-06 03:38:16+00:00): Is any part of this edit based on survey?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-06 03:40:16+00:00): As in, have you visited any of this locations in person?

Or have you guessed/used Google Maps Street View etc?
bxl-forever (2025-02-04 19:28:30+00:00): Hello.

Just curious: did you really visit Norway, the Azores, New Guinea, Japan (changeset 162115214), Arizona (changeset 162115214) and Paraguay (changeset 162123641) on a single day?

An inspection of your latest changes suggests you are actively changing tags on brands, which is fairly unusual when using StreetComplete (not to mention the misleading source=survey tag and the giant bounding boxes).

Have a nice day.
Edison Wen (2025-02-05 12:38:58+00:00): Hello, I uesd StreetCompete to explore various cities in my free time. As for the brand part, I found that many users did not pay attention to the brand when creating POI. If the category name matches, I will update it, and if there is a branch value, it will be updated simultaneously.

Also I'd like to explain why the changeset scope is so large. In fact, they were all uploaded separately and separated by a period of time, but for unknown reason StreetCompete merged them all together.

Thanks for asking and have a nice day.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-06 03:38:28+00:00): Is any part of this edit based on survey?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-06 03:40:24+00:00): As in, have you visited any of this locations in person?

Or have you guessed/used Google Maps Street View etc?
citrula (2025-02-04 21:55:15+00:00): Is this actually in construction? It doesn't look like it from aerial imagery.
rebbia75 (2025-02-04 12:44:19+00:00): Source : Fédération Française de Football
emersonveenstra (2025-02-12 17:42:52+00:00): Hi there,

You created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356658405 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356658434 with no tags, can you please go back and tag them? Thanks!
Firefishy (2025-02-04 14:48:30+00:00): Thanks :-) Happy Mapping. Any other improvements which you have local knowledge of greatly appreciated.
CJJ2501 (2025-02-05 17:57:20+00:00): Nice!
Langlaeufer (2025-02-19 08:23:31+00:00): Hmm, du hast auf den Radweg foot=yes gesetzt (dieses Konstrukt ist außerst selten) und gleichzeitig bei der Straße, dass es weder Fuß- noch Radweg gibt. Das passt so nicht zusammen. Ich habe auf Fuß- und Radweg daher mit seperate verwiesen und den Seitenweg in path geändert. Ist der Seitenweg irgendwie als Rad- oder Fußweg beschildert?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162124814
majus (2025-02-19 10:52:10+00:00): Der Weg ist per Grünstreifen unterschiedlich weit abgesetzt von der Straße. Er hat keine offizielle Beschilderung, an der Kreuzung steht ein Fahrradwegweiser.
Syl (2025-02-05 09:35:49+00:00): Bonjour, ce que vous avez ajouté n'est pas cohérent. Vous avez mis que seul le cash est accepté mais vous avez aussi ajouté d'autres moyens de paiement.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-02-05 09:39:36+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci de votre alerte, nous allons faire les corrections nécessaires
Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
eggie (2025-02-04 15:35:11+00:00): Dag Wesbalt.. Bijna altijd zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van oneway=yes
Is dat hier het geval?

Dan toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no en evt ook voor mofa en moped.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-04 15:42:15+00:00): Ik heb het als bovenstaand aangepast zodat het weer voor fietsers routeert.
Groet
eggie
Halfix (2025-02-04 15:14:46+00:00): Naja, jetzt ist es formal (fast) korrekt, aber der praktische Nutzwert ist deutlich reduziert. OSM ist in meinen Augen kein akademisches Selbstzweckprojekt, sondern sollte realen Menschen einen praktischen Nutzen liefern und in diesem Sinne bin ich durchaus bereit für eine signifikante Erhöhung des Nutzwertes die "reine Lehre" manchmal etwas zu beugen. "Fast korrekt" ist es, weil die Position der 189 auch jetzt noch nicht stimmt. Tatsächlich steht sie in 2m Abstand parallel zur 149. Da wo du sie jetzt hingeschoben hast und wo man im DOP 2022 Luftbild was sieht, das ist eine kleine Laderampe. 2022 stand die 189 noch gar nicht und ist damit auch nicht im Luftbild. Wenn man sie ganz korrekt einzeichnet, wird sie gar nicht mehr gerendert, das weiß ich weil ich sie im ersten Versuch seinerzeit exakt positioniert hatte. Der praktische Nutzwert des Nodes geht dann auf Null.
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-02-04 15:21:40+00:00): OSM ist eine Datenbank und wir versuchen die Daten so korrekt wie möglich einzutragen. Kartenrenderer kennen das Problem und können selbst solche Verschiebungen durchführen. Datenauswertungen wie Dichte der Paketstationen funktionieren übrigens weiterhin zuverlässig genauso wie das Suchen und Routing zur Packstation via Router. 😉

Magst Du die Position korrigieren?
Halfix (2025-02-04 16:10:57+00:00): Ich kenne natürlich dieses Mantra "wir mappen nicht für den Renderer". Das wird auch durch stete Rezitation nicht richtiger. Ein realer Mensch bekommt von DHL eine Mail, dass sein Paket in die Packstation 189 Nägelsbachstr. 59 umgeleitet wurde. Also flugs die Carto-Karte aufgemacht und im Bereich der Nägeslbachstr. 59 nach der Packstation 189 gesucht. Ist aber leider nicht eingezeichnet. Der Vertreter der reinen OSM-Lehre sagt "kein Fehler, alles korrekt in der Datenbank, dass man sie nicht sieht, ist ein Feature und kein Bug", ich persönlich erlaube mir, das anders zu sehen. Der reale Mensch geht dann übrigens nicht mit einem OSM-Router suchen, sondern zu G-Maps, da werden beide Packstationen namentlich angezeigt, zwar beide nicht exakt an der richtigen Stelle, aber genau genug, dass der reale Mensch weiß, wo er jetzt hinmuss, um sein Paket abzuholen. Also nein, wenn du die 189 in OSM komplett verschleiern möchtest, musst du das schon selber machen. Im Bayernatlas https://atlas.bayern.de/?c=644863,5494693&z=20&r=0&l=vt_luftbild&t=ba kann man sie genau sehen (falls das nicht wieder gegen Luftbildlizenzrechtsprinzipien verstößt).
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-02-04 16:31:29+00:00): Du musst das ja nicht mögen, aber das ist halt ein Community-Konsens. Und ja, man sollte auf kompatible Lizezen achten beim Mappen.

Schade, dass Du Dich so querr stellst. Vielleicht überdenkst Du Deine Position nochmal.

Viele Grüße
rhhs (2025-02-04 15:54:50+00:00): Hi, are you sure that that way is not part of ul. Методи Андонов? I tried searching for documentation but only found that there is such a street but not where exactly it is. I think there are no street name signs there at all. If you're sure it's an unnamed street, please remove the way from the Методи Андонов road route relation too.
Pozdravi, Richard
AlexSpritze (2025-02-11 08:19:29+00:00): Hi,
warum hast du (u.a.) die Kardinal-Albrecht-Straße zu `tertiary` gemacht?
rskedgell (2025-02-04 14:46:12+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for spotting and correcting that.

From Bing's street side imagery, it looks like the segregated cycle path starts between Mallard Close and Wigeon Close and it's a block paved footpath (only) South of there. Is that still the case?

I've made a couple of minor tweaks to he tagging here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162128649
Twamgle (2025-02-04 15:06:36+00:00): Yes it’s a shared segregated footway/cycle track in asphalt from London Road to Great Notley Avenue, then north along the east side of Gt Notley Avenue towards Wigeon. South side of that it’s only a remote footway in block paving south to Notley Approach.
rskedgell (2025-02-04 15:49:47+00:00): Thanks! It may take a few weeks for the change to propagate to cycle routing software based on OSM data. I mostly use Komoot, which typically takes 1-2 weeks.
Dimitar155 (2025-02-04 15:30:43+00:00): Благодаря!
NeisBot (2025-02-08 08:06:07+00:00): Hi Weiyu152, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 54 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
rskedgell (2025-04-23 08:17:36+00:00): When iD suggested a tag "upgrade" adding operator:type=private to an NHS hospital, why did you accept this when it was obviously wrong?
totera (2025-02-06 01:20:01+00:00): Ciao damianeue,
a proposito di questo nodo che hai modificato https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11994621279 ti segnalo che esiste un tag apposito per negozi che vendono cover o altri accessori per cellulari: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmobile_phone_accessories
totera (2025-10-30 17:49:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18650770 e https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18650771 sono divieti completamente inesistenti, si tratta di manovre consentite da segnaletica verticale e orizzontale
Dimitar155 (2025-02-04 15:28:38+00:00): Благодаря!
pitfire (2025-02-13 10:59:48+00:00): Hallo geowas,
parking=surface benötigt eine Zufahrt. Der Parkplatz (Weg: 421920501) ist mit der aktuellen Weganbindung ausschließlich "highway=path" nicht erreichbar. highway=path ist ein allgemeiner Weg für den nicht motorisierten Verkehr. 
Gruß pitfire
Mapiate (2025-02-04 19:30:17+00:00): Ignore the initial changeset comment. I copied and pasted the wrong comment. I added a few buildings in this changeset.
das-g (2025-02-04 14:28:31+00:00): (I meant "Kala Bagan".)
marczoutendijk (2025-02-04 15:01:21+00:00): Your comment now is "اصلاحات", but it would help others even more if you describe in more detail what your are doing.

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
IvaLedinščak (2025-02-06 21:50:57+00:00): Reverted because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162224528
literan (2025-02-22 23:19:00+00:00): а зачем теги отелей удалять? tourism=hotel?
eggie (2025-02-04 15:24:30+00:00): Dag Steven.. Je bank heb ik losgemaakt van het pad 
. Je zou 'm naar de juiste plaats kunnen schuiven.
MVG
eggie
luiswoo (2025-02-04 15:46:10+00:00): Шиз, давай рожай, по какому пункту я "вандалил":
    Copyright infringement
    Disputes within the OpenStreetMap database (edit wars)
    Disputes on the wiki
    Inappropriate use of Bots
    Persistent disruptive behaviour
    Spamming
    Purposeful removal or degradation of data that are known to be correct
    Deliberate adding incorrect data
    Undiscussed imports.
    insulting or contentless notes
    repeatedly opening notes that were validly closed
ivanbranco (2025-02-05 10:36:14+00:00): Hi oltengel,

something went wrong. You draw a footway on the top of an already existing path. What were you trying to achieve?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-06 17:15:48+00:00): Hello!

You used
colour=weiß
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2859997335/history

Have you maybe meant
colour=white
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
justin5822 (2025-02-04 15:29:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted. The way the border was represented originally was correct, and either way the legal border is the west bank, not the center.
Glassman (2025-02-20 02:55:51+00:00): Farmland typically doesn't have names like 8

Please remove the names unless there is a sign for the field.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162130444
John Harvester (2025-02-24 23:32:38+00:00): It's cuz I'm make a map for my game! And I would appreciate it if you wouldn't ban me until I'm done. Please wait till I'm done so I can make a map of a location that I enjoy!
CRCulver (2025-02-09 12:14:52+00:00): There is no need to remove traffic_signals:direction tags from traffic signals like you did at 38.1884463, 21.6907385. The tag is not incorrect.
sheldonelectric (2025-02-09 12:53:13+00:00): The tag is not incorrect, but it's redundant when it's on a 1-way street. The consumers will work correctly even without this redundant tag.

Also, I found too many cases where it was facing the wrong direction of the 1-way street. It's better not to put it at all, unless the traffic goes both ways.
Konmuang (2025-04-24 08:09:40+00:00): Hello, thanks for contributing to the Openstreetmap!

You have put a ford=yes as a connect node in a street and waterway, this may have been a mistake by iD editor.
Instead, please create a road with bridge (over) the water or water tunnel, depends on the context.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162130906
eggie (2025-02-04 15:56:57+00:00): Hoi,

Beter geen name=... gebruiken voor veldnummers en een combinatie met surface te beschrijven.
We kennen ref=  en surface=

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mappen-van-veldnumering/120739

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-04 16:03:51+00:00): De velden zijn hier al getagd met een ref.
Net als het kunstgras.
eggie (2025-02-04 15:46:05+00:00): Dag Wesbalt Ik had het aangepast...  Maar prima dat je er naar kijkt.

De juiste tag moet dan zijn oneway:bicycle=no en dat heb je nu juist weer verwijderd.
Je edits:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162131364
Dus je kunt oneway:bicycle=no toevoegen. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2025-02-04 16:01:39+00:00): Ik heb de uitzondering opnieuw toegevoegd. Het zal anders niet routeren voor fietsers.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-04 17:18:52+00:00): Hoi,

Die huisnummers worden geïmporteerd vanuit het Kadaster. Dat gaat soms willekeurig. 
Ligt aan het Kadaster. 
Ze kunnen ook op een hoopje liggen.
Je kunt er gerust mee schuiven.

MVG
eggie
shishish1sh1sh1 (2026-05-19 00:39:24+00:00): This has now moved to the old West Gorton Youth Centre.
NeisBot (2025-02-04 15:52:49+00:00): Hello Andrew Demars, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/12556732480

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=162131577
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-04 22:28:52+00:00): reverted. 
see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571 for discussion

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162144815
Jrachi (2025-03-18 09:45:36+00:00): Ciao.
Hai cambiato il tipo di strada sula way 670483039.
Ora è un pezzo di service in mezzo ad unclassefied

Ivo
Jrachi (2025-03-18 09:47:20+00:00): E hai lasciato un pezzo della way 670500008 da tagliare

Ivo
totera (2025-02-06 01:02:30+00:00): Il primo collegio elettorale mappato in Italia, complimenti :)
Dovremmo scegliere dei valori per il tag political_division (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:political_division) in modo da distinguere Camera/Senato e collegi uninominali/plurinominali (io ho usato ward per mappare una sezione elettorale).
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 03:11:02+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165094347