piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kikihadwiyanti (2024-05-26 02:19:11+00:00): Good and accurate mapping. Keep up the mapping, cheers!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151824500
kikihadwiyanti (2024-05-26 02:13:12+00:00): Good and accurate mapping. Keep up the mapping, cheers!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151824530
kikihadwiyanti (2024-05-26 02:12:31+00:00): Good and accurate mapping. Keep up the mapping, cheers!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151824549
kikihadwiyanti (2024-05-26 02:12:19+00:00): Good and accurate mapping. Keep up the mapping, cheers!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151824629
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-05-25 19:26:47+00:00): Hi, good detailing, but please don't remove ways inside parking lots. It allows to use routing software.
kikihadwiyanti (2024-05-26 01:10:49+00:00): Good and accurate mapping. Keep up the mapping, cheers!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151824652
kikihadwiyanti (2024-05-26 01:09:58+00:00): Good and accurate mapping. Keep up the mapping, cheers!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151824671
kikihadwiyanti (2024-05-26 01:09:19+00:00): Good and accurate mapping. Keep up the mapping, cheers!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151824690
Hufkratzer (2024-05-25 20:44:47+00:00): "irgendwo hier müsste auch der reitstall burgstett/ganz sein ...". Das ist aber kein Grund, den Reitplatz und den Roundpen als Reitställe zu taggen.
Punktepferd (2024-05-26 08:44:33+00:00): Das stimmt, war ein versehen ;)
kikihadwiyanti (2024-05-26 01:07:58+00:00): Good and accurate mapping. Keep up the mapping, cheers!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151824724
kikihadwiyanti (2024-05-26 04:32:50+00:00): Great work on your mapping. Keep contributing, cheers!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151824737
kikihadwiyanti (2024-05-26 00:56:00+00:00): Great work on your mapping, Keep it up, cheers!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151824766
kapazao (2024-05-26 08:46:56+00:00): Will you fix geometry from your ways or other users will need to do that?
Why cannot you check OSM map when you edit using Strava imports?. It is not hard to add fords, bridges or tunnels when a highway crosses a waterway. You must use a good zoom to add those elements or they will be drawn out of his lane and will make a lot of problems.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151825003
mikko_tamura (2024-06-13 12:15:28+00:00): Please remove the 2500 capacity you can add capacity=2500 instead of adding it in the name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151825052
Honey Fombuena (2024-06-03 19:42:46+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution! Please change the tourism key to "name" unless the restaurant also contains a tourism feature.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151825189
Honey Fombuena (2024-06-03 19:44:08+00:00): Please disregard the previous message. Thank you!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151825189
DomKor (2024-05-25 19:18:49+00:00): comunque ho per sbaglio usato un commento già fatto, ho solo risolto due problemi
Dave Venables (2024-05-26 07:33:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1040256298 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187883763 have access = no and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1040256302 has access = private
Does this access need updating?
Ian1234_frog (2024-05-26 09:59:18+00:00): You're completely correct. I've updated the access tags. Sorry for the poor original modification!
eggie (2024-05-25 20:51:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM. I merged your info with the present addressnode
greetz
eggie
rskedgell (2024-05-25 19:56:53+00:00): Thanks. I could see the road layout had changed from the aerial imagery, but didn't have time to remodel it when I fixed the weight limit tagging.
Metzor (2024-05-26 08:19:24+00:00): Hi offissa,

Welcome again, see also my other comment.

I travel this road almost every day by bike and I am quite sure there is no sign that forbids using that road by bike, horse or on foot.

One could discuss is one should tag "use_sidepath", see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepath
That is probably correct, if you enter the road from downtown Metzingen.  Coming from Maienwaldstraße, however, there is no sign legally forcing you to use the separate path.

What's your opinion?

Best regards
Metzor
offissa (2024-05-26 11:56:15+00:00): Entering this section from the east, there is Zeichen 240 on the path to the north. To be honest, I don't know about the situation for the other direction. How do you map a street that is only one-way for bikes?
Metzor (2024-05-26 12:28:45+00:00): Hi!

See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle

bicycle:forward=* and bicycle:backward=* can be used if restrictions apply only in one direction - this is useful for example in cases where

    bicycle:backward=yes
    bicycle:forward=use_sidepath
Honey Fombuena (2024-06-03 19:54:28+00:00): Hi, thank you for your contribution! Here are some suggested tags that you can choose from to map this feature (amenity=community_centre + community_centre=youth_centre or club=youth)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151825811
kikihadwiyanti (2024-05-26 00:54:53+00:00): Great work on your mapping, Keep it up, cheers!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151826662
Emilius123 (2024-08-05 16:38:45+00:00): 👍👍👍
NeisBot (2024-05-25 20:12:08+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-25 20:29:49+00:00): Hi MapHay123,

Thanks for your edits.
I've checked some of your name changes and they seem fine.

However, your boundary changes and your building in the USA with a place=city tag look a bit strange to me.

Best regards,
Pascal
MapHay123 (2024-05-25 21:58:36+00:00): Hi there,
I don't know how that happened sorry about that.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-26 06:56:27+00:00): Thanks for your answer.

Could you revert the mentioned edit?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-26 17:58:28+00:00): Co na celu miała edycja https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374409131/history ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-27 17:51:59+00:00): edycja wycofana w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151912197
emersonveenstra (2024-08-06 11:48:56+00:00): Hi there,

Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1286668336 supposed to be a bridge? I don't see one on the aerial imagery
waterced (2024-06-05 16:30:38+00:00): Bonjour CYCLO_LUCEEN,
Je commente au sujet de cette voie verte que je connais bien et que j'ai contribué à mettre à jour. Je crois que la piste est réservée aux vélos/piétons + desserte agricole, si je me souviens bien des panneaux sur place, c'est pourquoi j'ai utilisé à l'époque le tag track plutôt que cycleway, comme explicitement préconisé par le wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Voies_vertes
En théorie, il faudrait rétablir le highway=track et plutôt faire évoluer les rendus pour qu'ils prennent en compte ces pistes agricoles, qui deviennent des voies vertes. Dans les faits je ne vais pas y retoucher, je ne pense pas qu'il y ait de gros préjudice à rendre le chemin inaccessible aux tracteurs dans OSM...
CYCLO_LUCEEN (2024-06-05 17:14:12+00:00): Bonjour,
merci pour cette correction de la correction. Je suis cycliste avant d'être mapper openstreetmap donc c'est sûrement moi qui suis dans l'erreur. Ma préoccupation était qu'il n'apparaissait pas les cartes banales s'appuyant sur osm que j'utilise, et qu'en conséquence un travail certain de la collectivité pour favoriser le vélo localement était sous-exploité pour les "non connaisseurs" du coin. Je crois comprendre qu'on peut aussi créer des couches "itinéraires cyclable" d'un niveau d'abstraction supérieur à la voie physique qui est, je crois, ce qui fait discussion ici. Ca serait peut-être le meilleur moyen de mettre en valeur la très bonne voie cyclable Thouaré-St Julien-LCBM, actuellemnt est peu visible sur Brouter, par exemple.
waterced (2024-06-07 12:53:39+00:00): Je comprends bien la motivation, je me suis fait précisément la même réflexion au sujet de cette piste cyclable.
Le fond de carte par défaut de Brouter est CyclOSM, je vais proposer de faire évoluer le rendu pour mieux représenter ces pistes cyclables autorisées aux engins agricoles.
Au dela de Brouter, quels sont les cartes/sites/applications que tu utilises le plus?
ToniE (2024-05-26 08:45:10+00:00): Servus Rainer,

die Tram 29 gibt es derzeit nicht, daher ist 

type= route_master

und 

suspended:route_master = tram 

gesetzt. Ich korrigiere das mal.

Gruß
Toni
Rainero (2024-05-26 08:52:25+00:00): Ups, das suspended habe ich nicht gesehen, sorry!

Servus,
Rainer
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-25 21:14:57+00:00): Hi MapHay123, welcome to OSM!

I'm not an expert but I guess the local community should check your edits.

Thanks.
MiniMapperPL (2024-05-25 20:50:35+00:00): [accidental edit of Pradolina Wrocławska] 
might've clicked on it by incident
eggie (2024-05-25 20:57:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Ik heb wat aangepast naar shop=bathroom_furnishing

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
AaronFitz (2024-06-02 12:34:19+00:00): Interesting.  We're both right on this one.  The lane does exist in the plat map you reference, as a private unnamed road servicing the two rear plots.  In the town GIS, it also does list it clearly:  https://narragansettri.mapgeo.io/datasets/properties?abuttersDistance=200&latlng=41.469796%2C-71.43248&zoom=19
RhodyMark (2024-06-02 14:18:02+00:00): Aaron: I think there are three reasons the GIS is likely incorrect in this case: 1) There is no street sign there, and Narragansett is pretty good about street signs.  2) The road is blocked now by a large iron gate, which makes it serve more as a driveway now than a road, and 3) I don't think fire and rescue would allow two streets to have names that would sound the same in an emergency call, no matter how close they are to one another.

I've run by it at least four times to check and see, but I am pretty certain the GIS is mistaken in this case. - Mark
Allison P (2024-06-03 02:40:12+00:00): The GIS site uses Google as a basemap. Google also uses TIGER data for names and geometry. This is why it shows up there as well.
Tjuro (2024-05-26 09:00:40+00:00): beste borishag,

Zo te zien heb je het kruispunt verplaast in een ronde vorm.

Een aantal dingen vallen op:

Je hebt een link toegevoegd.

De telling van de rijbanen (lanes=*) klopt niet.

Je hebt een cirkel met junction=yes toegevoegd.

Zou je deze dingen op willen lossen?

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-26 04:33:58+00:00): Hello, you changed an entire residential area into a beach and set a town boundary as a waterway. I've reverted your changes. If you are looking for a beach to find Wiglett in Pokemon GO, this existing one should count for you: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391983351
NeisBot (2024-05-26 07:04:09+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151835043
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-25 21:14:43+00:00): Hi MapHay123, welcome to OSM!

I'm not an expert but I guess the local community should check your edits.

Thanks.
NeisBot (2024-05-26 07:02:56+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151834966
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-26 07:12:22+00:00): Please don't add non existing beaches. Thanks!
phodgkin (2026-05-13 17:32:05+00:00): Is level=1 correct for this ATM? It would imply it was on an upper floor, but the building looks to be a single level.
aceman444 (2024-10-18 00:24:20+00:00): Zaujimave, dakujem.
Cucazer (2024-05-25 21:37:56+00:00): Additional source: https://www.ievp.gov.lv/lv/strukturvieniba/daugavgrivas-cietums
Flynn Marquardt (2024-05-26 20:24:01+00:00): Hello,
this changeset removed essential parts of the border of Quintana Roo, the border does not close anymore: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2614434#map=11/21.2577/-86.7924
and is useless.

Please fix or revert this.

Please use JOSM and the verify button/function. to check your edits, if the bortder remain still valid.
ferog_v (2024-05-26 20:28:17+00:00): I'm redrawing the border it was at an incorrect place and going over land places where it is not divided.
This is being donde according to the "Plan de Desarrollo Urbano del municipio de Isla Mujeres".
Which has official municipal borders for this part of the state.
silversurfer83 (2024-05-26 20:33:51+00:00): Gude :)

habe mal neugierigerweise geschaut, ob es eigene tags für Schilderbrücken gibt...

Gibt es: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dgantry

happy mapping :)

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151829939
syzuub (2024-05-26 21:17:47+00:00): danke für den Hinweis, habe ich wohl nicht lange genug im Wiki gesucht, habe die Schilderbrücken entsprechend verbessert
silversurfer83 (2024-05-26 21:43:50+00:00): Top :)
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-25 22:57:14+00:00): Why are you deleting everything?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151830183
NeisBot (2024-05-25 22:24:25+00:00): Hi cafe_azul, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/node/11933916895

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-26 07:07:40+00:00): Thanks for your mapped beach.
Looks good!

#HappyMapping
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-05-26 10:19:04+00:00): Merci d'avoir détecté l'erreur de nom de rue!
pantufla (2024-05-29 16:17:29+00:00): No es correcto aplicar una referencia en name=*
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-05-26 10:16:22+00:00): Attention ici, si vous retirez ce segment, les vélos ne peuvent pas être routés vers le parc. Il faut les conserver. C'est le but des traverses unmarked. Je n'ajoute jamais de traverses qui ne sont pas nécessaire spour le routing. Merci!
retchau (2024-05-26 13:19:04+00:00): Bien noté, merci pour ces explications et désolée de la modification erronée.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-05-26 10:13:19+00:00): Il faut conserver cette traverse, car elle est légale. Les piétons peuvent traverser à toutes les intersections au Québec, même si c'est dangereux, sauf si présence de panneau d'interdiction. Si on les retire, le routing peut faire faire des détours non plausibles. C'est exactement l'objectif d'utiliser des traverses unmarked. Merci!
retchau (2024-05-26 13:18:11+00:00): Ok, je comprends mieux leur présence. Merci pour ces explications et désolée pour la modification erronée.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-05-26 13:51:33+00:00): Aucun problème! Merci pour vos contributions! Bonne journée!
tastrax (2024-05-26 06:58:25+00:00): Hi Folks – Unit numbers should be added to addr:unit key rather than combined with the addr:housenumber key. I have just updated a recent edit you made. Cheers
BCNorwich (2024-06-05 06:40:59+00:00): Hi MacLondon, I just noticed that there is a duplicated section of cycleway. Namely Way: Hoe Street (1277857277) on top of Way: Hoe Street (662493479). Each is a member of a different route relation. There are more similar duplications on these cycleways to the south on Hoe Street, please see:- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-0.01572&lat=51.57772&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

I'm not local so I thought you might be the person to look at this problem.

Regards Bernard.
MacLondon (2024-06-10 10:57:55+00:00): Hi Bernard, they are currently realigning some of the old cycleway here and constructing new cycle tracks to create a continuous cycleway on both sides of the roads.

Mapping-wise it a bit fiddly at the moment, but I do check on the works more or less weekly.
MacLondon (2024-06-10 12:11:01+00:00): I just did updates here and noticed the problem that got introduced. Someone had wrongly extended the currently open cycleway to  permit pedestrian access.

I've rectified this now and added pedestrian access round the works at this spot.
tastrax (2024-05-26 06:52:22+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number. No brackets are required  around any part of the number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
MxxCon (2024-05-31 02:01:06+00:00): Hello.
Why did you delete so many buildings here and randomly deleted other buildings' corners?! If you don't know how to properly use Josm or what needs to be done to disconnect buildings or fix overlapping ones, please DO NOT damage the data!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151832412
Melhorias no Piemonte (2024-05-26 22:11:04+00:00): Olá, Erick. Isso não é uma rodovia estadual (BA)! Como podemos nos resolver pra essa edição ser desfeita?
Lezurex (2024-05-26 10:02:11+00:00): Hallo Makeena,
danke für deinen Beitrag!

Bitte in Zukunft auch einen kurzen Changeset-Kommentar schreiben, wo du deine Änderungen zusammenfasst. Das ist hilfreich für Leute wie mich, die sich Änderungen in der Region anschauen. 

Achte auch darauf, dass die Changesets nicht zu gross werden. Du hast hier hauptsächlich in Lieli/Rudolfstetten gearbeitet, eine einzelne Änderung liegt aber auf der anderen Seite von Zürich, was das ganze Changeset in die Länge zieht und so auch für jene Leute in der Stadt Zürich sichtbar wird. Aber halb so wild.

Bei weiteren Fragen einfach fragen, zum Beispiel auf der OSM Community: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/ch/107

LG und Happy Mapping
Lezurex
Makeena (2024-05-26 18:53:03+00:00): Hi Lezurex
Ich habe während meiner Bearbeitung in Adlisberg nachgeschaut, wie eine Bezeichnung da eingetragen ist, um mit meinem Eintrag dazu konsistent zu sein. Dabei habe ich gemerkt, dass eine Änderung, die ich schon länger vorgenommen habe, noch nicht übernommen worden ist.
Tatsächlich ist die Änderung auch bisher noch nicht in die gerenderte Karte übernommen worden: Während alle meine Einträge in Lieli bereits gerendert werden, wird in Adlisberg immer noch eine veraltete Version angezeigt. Konkret gehört der obere/östliche der beiden Wege, die mit Waldlehrpfad bezeichnet sind, nicht zum Lehrpfad, es gibt weder einen Wegweiser noch eine einzelne Tafel auf diesem Weg. Weisst du, wie man diese Bezeichnung richtig entfernen kann?
Vielen Dank!
Lezurex (2024-05-26 19:03:56+00:00): Hallo Makeena,

Ja, das passiert uns allen mal, ist mir auch schon passiert.

Bezüglich den Änderungen musst du dir keine Gedanken machen. Die Karte braucht manchmal ein paar Minuten, um sich zu aktualisieren. Dein Browser speichert die Tiles auch im Cache. Wenn du die aktuellste Version sehen willst, solltest du openstreetmap.org also mit Ctrl + F5 neu laden, damit auch alle Tiles vom Server und nicht vom Cache geladen werden.

Im Datensatz selbst sind deine Änderungen aber immer sofort vorhanden. Keine Sorge.

LG Lezurex
Jaycee1983 (2024-05-26 03:04:49+00:00): Sorry about this edit. It shows more of an area rather than an added building and the website wouldn't allow me to delete it. I had to play around with the site to figure out how to use it and this first edit was the result. :(
AngocA (2024-05-27 03:26:24+00:00): Hola Camilo. Veo que todos tus cambios dicen "ajustes". Te recomiendo que seas algo más explícito para saber qué estabas modificando. "Ajustes Armenia" o por en ejemplo en este caso "Ajuste Colegio Madre Marcelina".
Inclusive te sirve a tu mismo cuando necesites revisar uno de tus propios cambios.
AM2023 (2024-05-27 21:32:16+00:00): Hola. Entendido. Disculpa.
MxxCon (2024-05-26 06:32:00+00:00): Hello.
Please split your edits into smaller geographic regions. There's no reason for this changeset to contain changes from Washington, US and Columbia.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151833879
osmviborg (2024-05-26 04:35:25+00:00): der er tagget 'cycleway=track' på vejen som cykelstien løber langs, derfor ingen separat cykelsti, tak. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstivejledning
NeisBot (2024-05-26 03:48:25+00:00): Hi Pisan Chueachatchai, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/way/1286712181
https://osm.org/way/625324936

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-26 07:10:50+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151838231
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-26 07:11:48+00:00): Please don't add non existing beaches. Thanks!
NeisBot (2024-05-26 03:51:24+00:00): Hi Pisan Chueachatchai, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/245108938

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-26 07:10:08+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151838208
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-26 07:11:53+00:00): Please don't add non existing beaches. Thanks!
Kovoschiz (2024-05-26 17:46:40+00:00): 1. You removed the learner driver restriction
2. The *:lanes:conditional=` syntax is wrong. JOSM has a bug. That's not what is complaining.
HolloWorld (2024-05-29 01:57:26+00:00): 1. learner driver can start from Fu Tin Lane to Lion Rock Country Park Parking/World-Wide Gardens without hitting any prohibited sign
2. added lanes:bus.
Bendita Moreira (2024-05-31 13:36:54+00:00): Hello Julmira according to my observation all your mapping of building looks good you use square for all building, so keep it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151835374