piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
fs_LT (2025-07-28 06:44:07+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168666069
phoenixsaigon1698 (2025-07-09 03:23:55+00:00): Tên đường trên VietmapLive và OSM thì không có liên quan gì đâu anh nhé. Anh có thể liên hệ trực tiếp bên Vietmap để cập nhật.
SD Mapman (2025-07-09 16:00:35+00:00): This made duplicates in Weld County of Morgan County routes... automation might not be the best way forward here
SD Mapman (2025-07-09 16:06:06+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mountain-west-automated-road-route-road-name-changes/132498

Please join!
NeisBot (2025-07-08 20:18:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 05:18:23+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/168667543
mcliquid (2025-07-09 19:09:08+00:00): Der Pumptrack war bereits vorhanden
emersonveenstra (2025-07-30 15:45:01+00:00): Hi there,

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159796977, `maxspeed:forward = 2` looks like a typo, could you please fix it? Thanks!
mcliquid (2025-07-09 17:32:48+00:00): Sportvereine werden mit club=sport eingetragen.
mcliquid (2025-07-09 17:30:07+00:00): Die drei Becken waren schon vorhanden:
way 778620364
way 778620365
way 778620366
StreetSurveyor (2025-07-14 01:10:17+00:00): This is incorrect. Please refer to:
https://gis.data.mass.gov/maps/5088c1b6af16420e98f1165d051d60df

Under state specific guidelines, Massachusetts has a classification standard.

MassGIS F-Class 2 = highway=trunk
MassGIS F-Class 3 = highway=primary
MassGIS F-Class 5 = highway

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance
Tjuro (2025-07-12 09:18:16+00:00): Hello Hervé TUC,

I see that you have forgotten to remove the name from the building, please dont add names to buildings that are not actually called that.

Greetings,

Tjuro
Hervé TUC (2025-07-12 09:32:16+00:00): Hi,

I didn't pay attention, thanks !
Tjuro (2025-07-12 09:15:58+00:00): Hello Hervé TUC,

I see you added some poi's. Please note that names should not contain | () etc.

You also did not use the exsisting adress.

Greetings,

 Tjuro
Hervé TUC (2025-07-12 09:30:08+00:00): Hi

I usually map in France, i don't know the practice for adresses here ; what do you do then if you have 2 companies at the same adress?
And for the name, why ? The company actually has a "|" in its name so...
Tjuro (2025-07-12 09:56:20+00:00): Hello Hervé TUC,

In the rare case that two companies have the same address. You can copy the address info to a new node.

This however generally does not happen, ether the new company takes over the old address or one of the two is not a company that is mappable. For example, holding companies or other companies that have no poi value.

Names of anything but especially companies should not be directly copied into OSM. The name needs to be curated for example no abbreviations no special characters. And no company type indicator like GMBH, LLC, BV etc.

For example, if a company has a name like “A” then the “ is removed. 

Greetings,

Tjuro
user_5359 (2025-07-09 17:55:16+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/12988461112. What is the mean of the tag Herneniemi = Toikanniemi ?
Larmax (2025-07-10 11:20:59+00:00): Hi, the tag should've been name=Herneniemi. Thanks for pointing that out!
Rainero (2026-03-04 17:52:33+00:00): Hallo brechetp,

hier ist was schiefgegangen: du hast das Live Evil vom Gasteig hier an die Treppe zu Sankt Nikolai verschoben.

Ich repariere das mal.

Servus,
Rainer
Leo Slager (2025-07-09 22:35:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
makebelieve (2025-07-10 06:03:41+00:00): Dank voor het bericht!


Hartelijke groeten,

Jense
buy_osmand (2025-07-17 13:18:24+00:00):  سُـبْحانَ الله 
(Subhanallah)
rempshaener (2025-07-09 19:00:21+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Das sieht gut aus – keine Anmerkungen!
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
rskedgell (2025-07-09 10:52:47+00:00): This cycle track probably shouldn't have foot=no (or any other value of foot=*) set on it, as there isn't a TSRGD diagram 955 sign (Route for use by pedal cycles and electric scooters being used in a trial, only) where it separates from the carriageway heading WSW. There's no pedestrian prohibition in place, although sane routing software will send pedestrians via the separate footbridge on the other side f the carriageway.
VLD298 (2025-07-10 19:52:32+00:00): Hello rskedgell, 

The "foot=no" tag was added to maintain consistency with the adjacent cycleway sections, which already had this tag. I see that you have made a few tag adjustments already, but if you would also like to remove the foot=no tag for better accuracy, please feel free to do so. 

Thanks, VLD298
rempshaener (2025-07-09 19:04:43+00:00): Hallo,
zum Hydranten keine Anmerkung.
Zur Sirene: der vorherige Standort war einigermaßen plausibel, jetzt steht sie an einer Stelle, wo eigentlich eine Mastmontage notwendig wäre. War das Absicht?
Viele Grüße
alpimd (2025-07-09 20:31:14+00:00): Nein, das war nicht meine Absicht, es war wohl ein Versehen
rempshaener (2025-07-10 17:42:22+00:00): Kein Problem, habe ich zurückverschoben
Viele Grüße
Friendly_Ghost (2025-07-08 22:35:25+00:00): Looks much better now. Thank you for the edit.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-07-08 23:37:46+00:00): DWG revert - sock puppet & vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168671455
mike140 (2025-07-09 07:27:16+00:00): В дома нужно также добавлять тег addr:street с названием улицы. И, кстати, "Яндекс карты гугл мапс 2гис" - это все в OSM нельзя использовать как источник данных
Fizzie-DWG (2025-07-08 23:37:47+00:00): DWG revert - sock puppet & vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168671455
Fizzie-DWG (2025-07-08 23:37:49+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18425
user_5359 (2025-07-09 17:44:51+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1413359155/history. Is my correction correct?
JochenB (2025-07-09 19:32:49+00:00): Oh, yes it ist correct. Thank you!
eerib (2025-07-08 22:40:56+00:00): Vandalism Account.

Most recent changesets have been fully reverted.

(168669536, 168669632, 168669693)
LPerry2UW (2025-07-08 22:12:40+00:00): Maybe I should have split this up into smaller edits. I won't make them so large next time.
seattlefyi (2025-07-09 06:36:26+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and congrats on your first edits! (Yes, smaller changesets help reviews.) Looked at a few changes, and they look pretty good!  I went ahead and added some type tags (bank, post office), expanded some abbreviated street names and some other minor changes, but great job! Hope to see more, your updates are helpful!
eerib (2025-07-08 22:41:03+00:00): Vandalism Account.

Most recent changesets have been fully reverted.

(168669536, 168669632, 168669693)
eerib (2025-07-08 22:41:08+00:00): Vandalism Account.

Most recent changesets have been fully reverted.

(168669536, 168669632, 168669693)
rempshaener (2025-07-09 19:05:26+00:00): Hallo,
auch hier: keine Anmerkung.
Viele Grüße
infeeeee (2025-07-09 09:27:06+00:00): Szia!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12546271150

crossing_ref helyett manapság a crossing:markings-ot használjuk, sokkal részletesebben le lehet írni felfestéseket: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:markings

A crossing_ref meg marad azokban az országokban ahol ezek a többi állatnevek használatban vannak, nálunk ilyenek nincsenek: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing_ref

Ezen a ponton már szerepelt a crossing:markings, nem kellett volna ezt mellé felvenni.

További jó térképezést!
Warin61 (2026-05-27 01:12:13+00:00): lane_markings=no means there is no centre marking ... 

Sutherland Rd has markings.. corrected.
TrickyFoxy (2025-07-10 00:34:21+00:00): Тут действительно два родника?
Ekaterina0603 (2025-07-10 03:28:03+00:00): Здравствуйте) нет, там один. Просто первый раз добавляла точку, думала без регистрации не ушла информация.
TrickyFoxy (2025-07-10 12:08:20+00:00): Хорошо, поправил
Joseph R P (2025-07-09 00:43:33+00:00): For clarification, a freeway connection isn't required for a road to be primary—just criteria to consider—especially because Sahara Ave directly connects to many other important roadways along its route. D.I. Road and 5th Street for example pass right over I 15 with no direct interchange.
Hypsometric (2025-07-10 17:11:39+00:00): Thanks for the edit. There are multiple schools here. So the school area should not have a name. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=school#Multiple_schools_on_one_site

I have fixed it.
IllusiveBat (2025-07-10 18:02:38+00:00): Apologies. I would have done this correctly the first time but I just started using OSM on Desktop and not StreetComplete. Thanks for the fix!
user_5359 (2025-08-03 18:09:57+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/279222859. What is the mean of the tag on name:1233 = Torre de Vinrabí?
Which language ist 1233?
Jordi MF (2025-08-03 19:16:54+00:00): Sorry,

I wanted to use the tag "old_name:1233=Torre de Vinrabí" because that was the name of the village in 1233. I am fixing it.

Regards,
Jordi
jhaluska80 (2025-12-12 19:03:08+00:00): I have been fixing a lot of routing issues in NJ, I see you also are interested in it as well.

In my experience that's not that the best way to fix it as it doesn't give the routers the correct information.

It's best to add access=customers (access=private for non stores/private residences, and access=destination for non through public roads) to prevent using sections of roads as a short cut (and assuming it's actually true).  It'll still use them for end point routing.

I put them a lot on the gas stations / stores on corners.

I know this is old and maybe you already learned it, but just in case.

I have updated it to customers for you.
Carto'Cité (2026-03-05 11:20:59+00:00): Bonjour.
Vous avez ajouté le tag public_transport=platform sur le quai https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1226176981, malgré la présence du tag disued:public_transport=platform et du tag note précisant « This section of the platform is no longer accessible to travelers ». 
Merci de vérifier les tags présents sur un quai avant de le modifier.
Antoine de Carto’Cité pour SNCF #Transilien
user_5359 (2025-07-09 17:24:16+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/12988657435. What is the mean of the tag banc = Croix?
ChrissW-R1 (2025-07-09 21:59:44+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/4846874
cuzi (2025-10-04 20:36:21+00:00): FYI There is a note about the name of one of the campgrounds that you changed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4990956
JessAk71 (2025-10-04 21:02:28+00:00): Thanks! Looks like the names on there before were the previous names, I have just updated it to reflect the latest name and configuration.
eerib (2025-07-09 00:47:03+00:00): Vandalism Account.

Most recent changesets have been fully reverted.

168672120
168672116
168672111
168672099
168672091
168672063
168672035
168672027
eerib (2025-07-09 00:46:56+00:00): Vandalism Account.

Most recent changesets have been fully reverted.

168672120
168672116
168672111
168672099
168672091
168672063
168672035
168672027
eerib (2025-07-09 00:46:49+00:00): Vandalism Account.

Most recent changesets have been fully reverted.

168672120
168672116
168672111
168672099
168672091
168672063
168672035
168672027
eerib (2025-07-09 00:46:38+00:00): Vandalism Account.

Most recent changesets have been fully reverted.

168672120
168672116
168672111
168672099
168672091
168672063
168672035
168672027
eerib (2025-07-09 00:46:32+00:00): Vandalism Account.

Most recent changesets have been fully reverted.

168672120
168672116
168672111
168672099
168672091
168672063
168672035
168672027
eerib (2025-07-09 00:46:25+00:00): Vandalism Account.

Most recent changesets have been fully reverted.

168672120
168672116
168672111
168672099
168672091
168672063
168672035
168672027
eerib (2025-07-09 00:46:14+00:00): Vandalism Account.

Most recent changesets have been fully reverted.

168672120
168672116
168672111
168672099
168672091
168672063
168672035
168672027
eerib (2025-07-09 00:46:07+00:00): Vandalism Account.

Most recent changesets have been fully reverted.

168672120
168672116
168672111
168672099
168672091
168672063
168672035
168672027
Supaplex (2025-07-09 02:53:12+00:00): 中文名字為國巨龜山廠
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168672508
eerib (2025-07-09 01:10:24+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168672775
Ewrt1 (2025-07-09 01:09:22+00:00): Also changed branding of areas
eerib (2025-07-09 01:10:25+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168672775
eerib (2025-07-09 01:10:26+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168672775
eerib (2025-07-09 01:09:16+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168672753
eerib (2025-07-09 01:09:17+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168672753
NeisBot (2025-07-09 01:48:02+00:00): Hi Bilal Jaber, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added new residential highway segment with associated nodes."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
eerib (2025-07-09 03:02:03+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168674389
eerib (2025-07-09 03:01:24+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168674379
eerib (2025-07-09 03:01:25+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168674379
eerib (2025-07-09 03:01:26+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168674379
user_5359 (2025-07-09 06:49:21+00:00): Hello! Please be careful! You mode https://www.osm.org/node/2296125428 the node more than 100 meters crosssing other streets. I move the node back to the original position. Please check the other nodes.
spookypgh (2025-07-09 21:40:05+00:00): Thank you for checking and correcting. I was doing this on my phone and it was acting wonky. I should only do this on an actual computer. 

Thanks again!
Joseph R P (2025-07-12 04:06:34+00:00): Hello, I'll admit that the highway classification page for Virginia is dated in that it implies the CBBT should be a motorway, but I would say it would make more sense not to tag it as one not just because of the undivided sections or RIROs, but rather because on either end of it, it's not a motorway, effectively making this just a long mostly-uninterrupted section of the Route 13 trunk expressway.
alstond981 (2025-07-12 14:19:30+00:00): Hi, I downgraded the CBBT to trunk here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168838220#map=10/37.0171/-76.0501
Joseph R P (2025-07-12 15:25:46+00:00): Thank you, I appreciate your response!
NeisReview (2025-07-09 06:23:42+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
rene78 (2025-07-10 10:46:04+00:00): Hi nazhifazman,

there are quite a few iD warnings in this changeset and https://openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/168674380.

Maybe you can check them again. If those are roads within the building maybe you can give them "layer=-1" or "tunnel=building_passage", etc. 

Roads that are not connected to anything else don't make much sense either.

Cheers
Rene
Baloo Uriza (2025-07-23 14:29:34+00:00): What was this edit supposed to accomplish?  It's not clear based off the changeset comment or what changed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168674767
Dbchdncindcnojasnxjoasvnhuwrfbh (2025-07-23 14:50:47+00:00): Its based on the July 8th, 2025 updtd TXDoT ARCGIS data (the data set used for taxes), most of Texas cities in OSM haven't been updated since ~2017 when it was mass imported
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168674767
Baloo Uriza (2025-07-23 15:34:59+00:00): But what changed?  Just the boundary?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168674767
Dbchdncindcnojasnxjoasvnhuwrfbh (2025-07-24 00:40:36+00:00): Yes- I'm doing the same for other cities too, (ie Magnolia and Texline), smaller, easier ones.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168674767
Frans S (2025-07-09 09:15:03+00:00): Hi Gnoye.
Don't run the validator tool before you upload your work ?
It shows errors like not using the right tag for layer at a bridge and not connected waterways
Best regards
eerib (2025-07-09 04:07:58+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675514
eerib (2025-07-09 04:07:59+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675514
eerib (2025-07-09 04:06:58+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675495
eerib (2025-07-09 04:06:59+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675495
valhikes (2025-10-04 17:20:04+00:00): I usually find it best, for an official trail like this, to map it as best I can and then set an appropriate trail_visibility.
stonepitts2 (2025-10-04 17:29:01+00:00): The trails in question are truly non-existent, and have never existed, despite being on the official USFS map. The USFS is notorious for this, at least on the Klamath. This is what happens when maps are made in the office with no input from the field.
valhikes (2025-10-04 18:01:42+00:00): I have hiked this trail. This trail is used by peak baggers. The biggest problem with it is trying to decipher it from all the cow paths. Both ends are visible.

Even if it truly did not exist, mapping it and stating trail_visibility=no is information that communicates to the casual user that this will be a very hard route to travel whereas deleting it only makes it look forgotten.
Glassman (2025-07-09 16:42:31+00:00): #TIP: drive-through ways typically do not have a name, aka descriptive name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168675691
eerib (2025-07-09 04:25:51+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675876
eerib (2025-07-09 04:25:52+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675876
eerib (2025-07-09 04:25:20+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675862
eerib (2025-07-09 04:25:21+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675862
eerib (2025-07-09 04:25:22+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168675862
JeroenHoek (2025-07-09 08:35:00+00:00): Voor https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6490176 geldt dat beide stoepen al los zijn ingetekend. `sidewalk=both` klopt dan niet, dat zou `sidewalk:both=separate` moeten zijn.
Ebruinsma (2025-07-09 17:57:12+00:00): Je hebt gelijk. ik pas het aan. Bedankt voor het meekijken.
APneunzehn74 (2026-03-16 11:47:04+00:00): Hallo noch einmal, hier hast du an die Gebäude zusätzlich zu der bereits vorhandenen ref die gleiche Bezeichnung als name gesetzt.
Ich bin der Meinung ref alleine bezeichnet die Gebäude völlig ausreichend, im OSM Sinne sind "name" nur tatsächlich Namen, Buchstaben und Nummerkombination werden üblicherweise mit ref angegebenen.
Grüße APneunzehn74
Breit S (2026-03-16 12:07:17+00:00): Hallo,
vielen Dank für deinen Hinweis. Mir war nicht bewusst, dass die gleiche Benennung Name sowie Ref zu Komplikationen führen kann. Mir war wichtig die Gebäude zweifelsfrei und sofort erkennbar wie das Gebäude heisst B18 oder B20 zu benennen. Gerne prüfe ich eine Änderung im Sinne deines Vorschlags.
VG und besten Dank für deinen Hinweis.
Samuel
NeisBot (2025-07-09 04:33:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 05:17:48+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/168677024
eerib (2025-07-09 04:49:17+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168676318
eerib (2025-07-09 04:49:18+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168676318
eerib (2025-07-09 04:48:32+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168676305
eerib (2025-07-09 04:48:33+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168676305
Fizzie-DWG (2025-07-09 05:43:52+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18426
SomeoneElse (2025-07-09 17:53:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 168708079, 168708082 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed guessed-geometry import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18428
mavl (2025-07-10 16:02:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168750719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18427].
Baloo Uriza (2025-07-09 18:25:51+00:00): Turn lanes are tagged based off the segment terminating at the node where the turns apply.  Further, "none" only works as a turn lane value if "no" is the access value for the same lane.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168676936
sanjanasharma_lyft (2025-07-22 10:06:24+00:00): Hi Baloo Uriza,

My name is Sanjana, and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for your comment. I appreciate you pointing out my mistake regarding the inaccurate addition of the turn:lanes, which were already correctly added. I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience my edits may have caused, and I will be more attentive in the future.
However, regarding the turn:lanes value, I rely on the OSM wiki, which states that the 'none' value should be applied if there are no lane markings or signs determining the allowed maneuvers on the lane. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn#Identifying_a_turn_indication:~:text=or%20%3Cempty%3E-,There%20are%20no%20turn,-indications%20on%20this
Could you specify what you reference to when mentioning the possibility of turn lanes “none” value usage based on access:lanes tagging?

Thanks for your contribution to OSM!

Best regards, Sanjana
Xvtn (2025-07-09 16:10:29+00:00): You may consider using the access=permissive tag to designate this situation. But as the local it's up to you.
EzyPup (2025-07-09 19:29:06+00:00): Cool thx.