piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jobigutenburg (2025-12-14 05:09:04+00:00): I understand, but the problem is that for Organic Maps (the app that uses OSM data), the country regions that have "place=state" tags are labelled clearly whole those with "place=region" tags aren't labelled. So to make the names visible in Organic Maps, I changed the tags.
ilias_ (2025-12-14 11:10:59+00:00): I’m sorry but that’s Organic Maps’ problem. You should send then a message asking them to render place=region.
Layft Greater (2026-03-11 07:24:09+00:00): Road classifications is incorrect. Changeset is reverted in 179677918
eggie (2025-12-13 19:20:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
mavl (2025-12-14 16:03:43+00:00): The local contributor writes that there is no road here.  
  
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=175836007
ratrun (2025-12-15 06:22:05+00:00): OK, what do you want me to say with this?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-13 21:22:35+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13373023080

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rarad74 (2025-12-13 18:59:34+00:00): Salut. Vezi ca pe Bucuresti au aparut imagini Mapbox care par a fi de anul acesta primavara- vara. Bing are imagini mai vechi de 7-8 ani.
DnaX (2025-12-13 19:56:56+00:00): Yes! Mapbox aerials are quite updated indeed :)
DFW-Backyard7 (2025-12-18 06:26:31+00:00): Is this flock supposed to be inside that housing complex where you put the point or is it closer and aimed at the frontage road?

I can go double check too and look for more flocks in melissa later this week
helianthis (2025-12-22 20:01:15+00:00): Oops my bad! This is on the frontage road pointing in the south direction, right before the entrance to the complex i believe.
mweper (2025-12-13 21:38:28+00:00): Hola xrosarinox. 
Por favor, debatir este cambio de la etiqueta "brand" con @muralito, ya que existe una nota anterior al respecto. 
Saludos.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/muralito
mweper (2025-12-13 21:39:25+00:00): Perdón, es con @serock que puso la nota.
ivanbranco (2025-12-16 21:56:07+00:00): Ciao, così in realtà hai aggiunto un unico gigante edificio, che ovviamente non esiste, purtroppo devo ripristinare la situazione precedente.
NeisBot (2025-12-20 09:10:19+00:00): Hello Осетр, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/13374501782

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175894283
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-20 09:14:33+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175907421
Осетр (2026-01-07 08:58:13+00:00): Sorry for this edit. My account was compromised by a 'friend'. I've changed my passwords and secured the account. This won't happen again.
giopera (2025-12-14 07:54:17+00:00): Gentile FonzyST il suo commit è stato revertato in quanto non sembra essere in regola e sembra aver eliminato un grande numero di costruzioni ancora presenti, le faccio notare che la rimozione di costruzioni deve essere fatta solo quando queste vengono demolite e se sono ancora presenti, anche se in disuso, vanno comunque mantenute sulla mappa.
Se ci sono altre ragioni per cui dovrebbero essere eliminate perfavore ci ricontatti qui con la motivazione.
Inoltre se possibile la prossima volta descriva meglio nel nome del changeset cosa ha fatto e come mai.
FonzyST (2025-12-14 13:22:07+00:00): Buongiorno scusatemi, gli edifici che ho eliminato sono ancora esistenti.
Sto facendo un progetto universitario di riqualificazione di quell’area, in cui stiamo ipotizzando di abbattere tutto.
Non mi ero accorto che le modifiche erano pubbliche.
Come posso reinserirli?
Szymson (2025-12-20 17:13:52+00:00): Czy ta droga powiatowa faktycznie jest oznakowana swoim numerem w terenie? Jeżeli nie, to ref należy zamienić na unsigned_ref
PT2023 (2025-12-20 21:47:27+00:00): Nie - w terenie droga powiatowa nie ma oznaczenia. Natomiast faktycznie zgodnie z dokumentami Zarządu Dróg Powiatowych ta droga ma nadany numer.
Szymson (2025-12-21 09:14:24+00:00): No to trzeba poprawić na unsigned_ref
Szymson (2025-12-28 11:23:06+00:00): Zapomniałeś tego małego ogryzka poprawić: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390992699
MK 1 (2025-12-14 19:51:20+00:00): Каков е тој автопатски излез без сообраќаен знак? Без лента за забрзување и намалување?
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-13 19:02:25+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175895214
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-13 19:04:18+00:00): ой, пардон. Вижу здесь действительно намечается стройка
MK 1 (2025-12-14 19:51:31+00:00): Каков е тој автопатски излез без сообраќаен знак? Без лента за забрзување и намалување?
ElliottPlack (2026-07-13 15:38:47+00:00): Hey thanks for adding this! Have you noticed any improvements since this has gone into effect?
MK 1 (2025-12-14 19:51:42+00:00): Каков е тој автопатски излез без сообраќаен знак? Без лента за забрзување и намалување?
mavl (2025-12-14 04:19:26+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удаляет существующее здание и добавляет на его место другое здание.   
  
"Но, "внося свою лепту, не выноси чужую"! Если что-то следует исправить, то это нужно именно исправлять, а не удалять и рисовать заново, так как история правок объекта бывает важна для различных целей".  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C

Этот пакет правок отменён.
Ozon OSM9 (2026-06-21 11:16:19+00:00): Здравствуйте, спасибо, поняла.
NeisBot (2025-12-13 19:49:06+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 24 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/1314292537 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1184850653 v1 | 3 crossings

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/12164816517 v2
https://osm.org/node/11005958416 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175896140
user_5359 (2025-12-14 12:30:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved two nodes over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
mavl (2025-12-14 04:50:46+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удаляет здание и добавляет на его место другое. Пакет правок отменён.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-03 09:55:30+00:00): Hello!

You used
area=yesZ
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/632789633/history

Have you maybe meant
area=yes
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
mavl (2025-12-14 04:50:19+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удаляет здание и добавляет на его место. Пакет правок отменён.
user_23610957 (2025-12-14 08:02:55+00:00): https://youtube.com/shorts/gcUMMsuMf2s
https://youtube.com/shorts/3wqSE5lPzPg
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/0u8BMAQhoZo
Unarmored5156 (2025-12-14 04:51:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM :)

I noticed you requested a review here, everything looks fine except for the postal code which should have a space (V6Y 3C3). 

Happy mapping :)
Udarian (2025-12-13 20:49:28+00:00): a few issues, the biggest is that this adds the operator tags as King County Metro when these seem to be from Broward County in Fl so it would be Broward County Transit. This also adds several stops in Miami dade county that that are next to already existing stops with the same name, so these are likely duplicates. These bus stops are also seemingly missing bus=yes.  Also, have you checked that the license on this is ODBL compatible.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
MK 1 (2025-12-14 19:52:58+00:00): Клучката се вика Миладиновци, инаку си го заборавил и Белград на мапава.

Автопатските излези се именуваат по населеното место не по патоказните знаци. 
Патоказните знаци се уредуваат како destination=*
JanezPavelZebovec_import (2025-12-13 20:36:36+00:00): Živjo!
Zgolj kot opomnik: že obstoječe točke ne rabiš (niti ni priporočeno) zbrisati, da jo premakneš :)
rokeg (2025-12-13 20:46:29+00:00): Zdravo,
hvala za opozorilo.
Bom v bodoče le premaknil točko. Včasih pa tudi internet ponagaja in mi da na napačno točko in potem pobrišem, namesto da bi samo premaknil.
maro21 (2025-12-14 21:30:55+00:00): Skąd ta nazwa ulicy?
Poprawiłem (2026-06-30 11:35:13+00:00): Białowieska? Trzeba było mi trafić pod adres w budynku przy Białowieskiej 45F-K zaraz po jego wybudowaniu. Stąd dodanie nazwy do tej nowej, szerokiej na 2 samochody, asfaltowej, z ddrip, nie mającej alternatywy w odległości 270m, drogi prowadzącej do siedmiu 9+ -piętrowych budynków mieszkaniowych mających adres 'Białowieska'.
MK 1 (2025-12-14 19:53:50+00:00): Излезот се вика Петровец.
pyram (2026-05-08 23:09:32+00:00): review:
Ich denke eher, dass das eine Beschreibung ist und keine offizielle Straßenbenennung. Oder steht da ein Schild vor Ort mit dem Namen?
MK 1 (2025-12-14 19:54:10+00:00): Нема такво населено место
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-15 16:23:02+00:00): You've moved ramp nodes very far from the intersections that they're serving.  Please don't do this, it negatively impacts driving directions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175897692
Kinsio (2026-07-10 03:49:31+00:00): Hi there, just wanted to let you know that I made a little change to the object you added here in my changeset 185448707. The direction tag is for expressing the direction that a feature is facing. Using a range there is for features that may move (i.e., there is not a single direction that they are always facing), but this doesn't apply to a Flock ALPR camera. I'm assuming that your intent was to make a field of view cone for the DeFlock map, so I just changed the direction value to the midpoint of the two values you had there before. If that's not correct, just let me know, or of course feel free to fix it yourself. Thanks for your contributions, and have a good day 😊
Aonikenk (2026-02-25 08:57:01+00:00): concernant l'épave d'avion je ne pense pas qu'il s'agisse du Rockwell Commander 114 qui correspond plutôt à https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7900664387
mueschel (2025-12-14 12:26:40+00:00): Hallo,
ein paar Fragen...

können hier tatsächlich 6x6=36 Lastwagen gleichzeitig laden?

"CCS" ist kein Steckertyp, ich nehme mal an, du meinst "type2_combo"?

Wieviele von dieser Sorte gibt es?

Bitte verwende nicht "amenity_2". Immer einen eigenen Node verwenden, sonst werden diese Informationen nicht nutzbar sein. Wahrscheinlich hat ohnehin nicht jeder Ladepunkt eine eigene Dusche und Verkaufsautomat?
rempshaener (2025-12-14 08:01:18+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe drei Anmerkungen:
- Monatsangaben:
Die conditional restrictions folgen der Syntax der opening hours. Dort werden die Monate als Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr, May, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec angegeben.
- Parkplatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1026815090
Überwiegend ausgewertet wird bei Parkplätzen „access“. Näher liegend wäre daher ein access:conditional an Stelle von vehicle:conditional.
- Fußwege (z. B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1026234403)
Das vehicle:conditional läuft ins Leere. Empfehlung: auf access:conditional umstellen.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 06:40:06+00:00): Hello!

You used
foot=yesx
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13374873163/history

Have you maybe meant
foot=yes
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
troglobiont (2026-02-04 12:24:05+00:00): It's a typo. 
Fixed it.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-11 15:08:19+00:00): 

thanks for a fix!

and for your mapping!
Futur3r (2025-12-18 00:54:33+00:00): Bonjour,
ce n'est pas possible de créer un noeud sans tag descriptif général comme amenity=toilets, natural=*, etc...
Et généralement les tags descriptifs se suffisent à eux même donc pas besoin de rajouter le tag name=*.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175899056
Comino (2025-12-14 10:16:19+00:00): Hi,

You've added a node that is incomplete. For instance, the address details are missing, the company name is incorrect, and the date syntax is wrong. I also can't find an address anywhere on the website, nor does the website indicate anywhere that they accept Bitcoin.
It very much looks like this is an online-only shop without a physical location. Those are not allowed on OSM. Please remove this POI.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
Glassman (2025-12-15 01:05:21+00:00): I changed the way to a drive way and added a node were the house might be. BTW - mapbox imagery is more current but still doesn't show any buildings. Feel free to move the node and add the city name and zip code.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175899248
Frans S (2026-02-08 11:24:36+00:00): Hello. thanks for mapping.
Please don't retag correct tagged highways (unclassified) which connect settlements into track. (just leading to farmland etc.
Best regards
Udarian (2025-12-13 22:34:05+00:00): the gtfs:feed is still US-WA-KCM which is incorrect for Broward County and there are still iD errors and duplicate bus stops in Miami dade County.
Supercoolmapeditor (2025-12-13 23:37:00+00:00): Working on now.

I'll remove the Miami-Dade stops for now as I'll have to manually check each one to see whether the duplicated one or original stop is the one most up to date.

Let me know if you have any other concerns. 

Thanks for your help!
nurdafur (2026-01-27 12:20:13+00:00): Hallo
Schön, dass du auch zur Verbesserung der Karte beiträgst. 
Du hast in diesem changeset den Mündungsbereich zwischen Krattigstrasse und Hauptstrasse angepasst und gleich daneben eine neue Verkehrsinsel mit Bushaltestellen zugefügt. Einzelne Fahrspuren sollten nur gezeichnet werden, wenn diese voneinander getrennt sind. Insbesondere beim Linksabbieger von der Krattigerstrasse in die Hauptstrasse ist dies wohl nicht der Fall. Da es noch kein neues Luftbild nach den Bauarbeiten gibt, ist dies für mich nicht zu prüfen. Statt separater Linien pro Fahrspur sollte wohl besser lanes, lanes:forward, lanes:backward und turn:lanes:forward/backward verwendet werden.
Auch die Einmündung des Radweges hat auf dem aktuellen Luftbild keine Trennung der Fahrspuren. Vielleicht möchtest du das nochmals anschauen und eventuell anpassen.
Die durch deine Änderung verursachten Lücken in den beiden Radrouten fülle ich schon mal.
Liebe Grüsse und weiterhin viel Spass beim Kartografieren
Urs
marc__marc (2026-01-24 18:15:06+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10004727876/history/9
la ref ZP+ est celle de Zephyre un peu plus au sud.
quel est ta source pour l'ajout du socket chademo sur un chargeur tesla ? je n'en ai encore jamais vu.
Cordialement,
Marc
marc__marc (2026-01-26 20:00:46+00:00): une autre confusion https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5820158325
K12230LF (2026-01-26 22:05:22+00:00): Merci pour ton message.
J'ai simplement ajouté les propositions de Podoma qui étaient juxtaposées au nœud.
Pour l'autre confusion, elle n'est pas de moi :)
Merci pour les revert.
marc__marc (2026-01-26 22:17:52+00:00): je me doute bien que c'est Podoma qui a proposé.
mais si on ne le fait pas en automatique, c'est justement parce qu'il y a besoin du sens critique de l'humain :)
même si l'outil doit aussi s'améliorer pour rajouter des tests possible en automatique
Zrop (2025-12-14 16:32:16+00:00): Hallo ZB_BN,
ein Einzelhandelsgeschäft/Kiosk der auch Postdienstleistungen anbietet wird nicht mit "amenity=post_office" sondern mit "post_office=post_partner" eingetragen.

Gruß
Zrop
literan (2025-12-14 11:13:17+00:00): а я везде из номеров телефонов дефисы удаляю

международный формат без них, насколько я понимаю
empty_child (2025-12-14 13:51:12+00:00): Все по ITU e.123! 
Я плагин для жосма использую
literan (2025-12-15 20:10:32+00:00): вроде там не должно быть никаких дефисов: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E.123
empty_child (2025-12-15 20:51:35+00:00): Тоже чекнул, больше на майкрософтовское расширение стандарта (причём не 123, а 164) похоже. Проверил доки оригинальной гугловской либы, от которой наследуется жосмовская. Там просто указано "библиотека для локализации номеров телефонов по их местоположению". Мне выходной формат кажется разумным, телефон на андроиде нормально парсит. Но если есть прям неприятие и порицание такого, я не буду применять автофикс
literan (2025-12-16 19:11:23+00:00): > Мне выходной формат кажется разумным, телефон на андроиде нормально парсит. 

как я понял, андроид дефисы просто не замечает

> Но если есть прям неприятие и порицание такого, я не буду применять автофикс

да нет такого, просто есть ощущение двойной бессмысленной работы ))
Robert Whittaker (2026-07-01 16:54:25+00:00): In this changeset you added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1458370800 tagged with both amenity=toilets and construction:amenity=toilets. Do you know if the toilets are open or under construction?
spiregrain (2026-07-01 17:16:55+00:00): For way/1458370800 as far as I know, it should still be a construction site.  But I've been there for several months now - it seems likely it's opened.   I'll fix it up later this evening.
spiregrain (2026-07-01 17:17:09+00:00): *not been there
spiregrain (2026-07-01 20:36:53+00:00): Looks like there's been a credible edit in April with something of a review in the description field; so I'm happy to remove the construction stuff.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-03 19:33:29+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13374936734/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle:repair and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service:bicycle:repair
Udarian (2025-12-13 22:26:15+00:00): this seems to be a duplicate
Udarian (2025-12-13 22:26:59+00:00): its also within the road area
Udarian (2025-12-13 22:25:54+00:00): this seems to be a duplicate
Chico_777 (2025-12-13 22:48:24+00:00): Sadly enough its not
Chico_777 (2025-12-13 22:50:49+00:00): There are 3 cameras in this area , and near the race trac gas station a gigantic solar panel police 4 camera one , these three are flock
Beinardus (2025-12-13 23:06:40+00:00): You noticed that you also deleted a butcher in this changeset?
Danb7 (2025-12-15 15:10:55+00:00): Hi , yes, meantbto remove the butcher as it no longer operates at Ratho Mains
Константин Гам (2026-03-13 12:58:47+00:00): Здраствуйте!
Тут что-то поменялось радикально? появился забор? Таблички "проход запрещен"?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1458378091
f_gonella (2025-12-15 08:29:23+00:00): Ciao HachiChan, la strada era già mappata (come Driveway). Non duplicare mai strade esistenti, al massimo puoi riclassificarle. Nel merito, ritengo che non sia corretto il livello "residential", ma più appropriato "service" in quanto una diramazione che conduce ad uno o due edifici.
voltairovicz (2025-12-14 10:40:37+00:00): Przecież dw 333 to przedłużenie DK36 do węzła na S3. Nawet znaki prowadzą na Zieloną Górę tędy, więc to cześć dłuższego połączenia. Takie kategorie nie mogą się tak nagle urywać
AdrianoWZL (2025-12-14 10:43:04+00:00): Tylko że chyba żółty kolor to drogi wojewódzkie a pomarańczowy to krajowe.
voltairovicz (2025-12-14 10:54:18+00:00): Jeżeli jesteś nowym użytkownikiem w społeczności OSM, to informuję cię, że nie takiej zasady u nas nie ma. Nie kierujemy się stricte identyfikacją urzędowym i tym kto zarządza drogą. Oczywiście, może to być iluzja, ponieważ ponad 90% dróg krajowych I Wojewódzkich jest tak zmapowana, ale to tylko właśnie dlatego, że przeważnie krajowki są ważniejsze od wojewódzkich i to się sprawdza, ale kwalifikacja urzędowa jest wadliwa i to, że ten odcinek drogi przeszedł na rękę województwa, nie oznacza, że przestał być ważnym łącznikiem. Takich absurdow mamy w kraju więcej i by zachować spójną sieć drogową, takie odcinki mogą jak najbardziej być zmapowane jako primary. Takich przypadków, zwłaszcza w miastach jest dużo więcej.
AdrianoWZL (2025-12-14 10:58:56+00:00): A to bardzo przepraszam za wadliwą zmianę, myślałem że używamy tych tagów tak jakimi kolorami są oznaczone te trasy w terenie.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-15 09:01:48+00:00): https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droga_wojew%C3%B3dzka_nr_219 jest dobrym przykładem

DK 82 to częściowo ścieżka - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366907258#map=17/51.551956/23.567305 - jest to droga ślepa ponieważ mostu ani przejścia granicznego z Białorusią nie ma, i nie zanosi się by było
pwbriggs (2025-12-14 06:58:51+00:00): Thanks for the business details. You left this tagged as a flooring shop, so I updated it. I know Organic Maps' editor isn't the most flexible, so no problem :)
arjunaraoc (2025-12-15 01:56:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). As  you have created a new road instead of modifying an existing one, can you check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434918578 and  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1458379586
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175901460
BCNorwich (2025-12-15 07:01:00+00:00): Hi, Unfortunatly your 2 new highways, Way: 1458379586 and Way: 1458379585 duplicate existing highways. Such duplication can disrupt routing, thus I've removed them.

If a feature needs amending/correcting please make that amendment/correction to any existing feature.

Regards Bernard.
Arjun24 (2025-12-15 11:14:51+00:00): Thanks Bernard
Actually I was correcting feature created by some of my students during a course on OSM.
borovac (2025-12-15 05:56:42+00:00): Hi,
Can I ask you to end this relationship since it has remained broken?
borovac (2025-12-15 06:03:50+00:00): This is list of broken relation.
Legok
Jambe 
Cisauk
Pagedangan
Kab Sukabumi
Cianjur
Kab Bekasi
Sawangan
Cipayung
Bekasi
Pamulang
Kecamatan Tapos
Lebak
Kabupaten Tangerang
Can you please fix them all.
FajrAl (2025-12-15 06:56:27+00:00): Sure
Sayed Muaaz (2025-12-26 05:53:42+00:00): I've been trying to use them (Bekasi in particular) but it still appears to be broken (or at least not showing up in Nominatim)
borovac (2025-12-26 09:05:26+00:00): Can you give me the ID numbers of the relationships you are having problems with so I can see why it is showing as broken relations?
FajrAl (2025-12-26 09:55:01+00:00): I think it appears to be this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1368055106/history Bekasi with Kab Bekasi boundary, not with Kab Bogor.