piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab (2023-01-10 01:10:38+00:00): Witaj, poprosiliście o weryfikację.

W tym miejscu zamieniłem fence na railing. Railing to bariera wykorzystywana często w ruchu drogowym tak jak tu. Płot kojarzy się z czymś innym.

Jeszcze jedna uwaga to że disabled parking space powinien znajdować się wewnątrz street side parking.
Infografika: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Street_Side_Parking.png

Pozdrawiam!
Scottie0001 (2023-01-13 11:47:29+00:00): Hello, this road is not fully a motorway standard road to be tagged as motorway, the more correct tagging of these roads would be as primary as previously tagged.
SHB2000 (2023-01-23 04:22:38+00:00): Agreed – while the road is technically a motorway (controlled access and two lanes each way), unlike this user's northern Memorial Drive change (which barely makes it per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Roads), the speed limit is way lower than the rest of the POB Mwy.
felipeeugenio (2023-01-10 00:12:44+00:00): >50k edits mappers just draw a road over a river
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131083508
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-10 00:17:15+00:00): Good night, check the changeset correctly, if you notice I just broke the via, I didn't create it. Check its node creation time: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3701771293
felipeeugenio (2023-01-10 00:25:32+00:00): strange. OSMCha reports it as deleted. maybe you are right.
Anyway, please contact the local community for this kind of note creation.
felipeeugenio (2023-01-10 00:28:50+00:00): nop. you deleted them
felipeeugenio (2023-01-10 00:31:09+00:00): fe de erratas. last two comments were for another changeset.
Langlaeufer (2023-01-10 07:37:04+00:00): Danke und frohes mappen!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131083589
Luzandro (2023-08-16 05:37:13+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe den Place node von Hausmannstätten wiederhergestellt, den du in diesem CS gelöscht hast, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3813351
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131083638
HmstCent (2023-08-16 11:14:02+00:00): Auweh das war nicht mit Absicht, danke
felipeeugenio (2023-01-10 00:11:55+00:00): footway was asked to be added in note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3506308; Local mapper adds them and then OP deletes them  10 minutes later.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131083694
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-10 00:19:30+00:00): Hello, I removed only one part, which is not visible in Strava or Maxar layer. And I left most of what was mapped as it was.
Scottie0001 (2023-01-13 11:46:06+00:00): Hello, this road is not fully a motorway standard road to be tagged as motorway, the more correct tagging of these roads would be as trunk as previously tagged.
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-05 04:42:56+00:00): Hello,

OSM is what is on the ground.  I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding historical features, but that type of data belongs on OHM (Open Historical Maps): 
https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/

Historical features do not belong on OSM if they no longer exist.  In this case, lines tagged as historic=road where no road exists anymore (or recently) belongs on OSM.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

I have gone ahead and removed these no longer existing features.  I encourage you to instead add these features on OHM.
luisforte (2023-01-10 00:48:39+00:00): Isto (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1129999718) não é parque algum de acordo com as ortofotos disponíveis.
Eliminou ainda alguns caminhos rurais nas edições posteriores. Está seguro com o que fez nestas edições?
VLD166 (2023-01-10 00:05:13+00:00): *Also updated names
sputinyk (2023-01-11 12:54:56+00:00): por favor, não grude áreas com vias como fez aqui
jmarchon (2023-01-10 00:38:55+00:00): Hi,
OpenStreetMap is not for advertising or spam. I have attempted to fix your changes. 
Have a nice day
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:02:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
Jodocus up Straat (2023-01-10 00:51:10+00:00): Entschuldigung: Puddeweg, nicht Hammweg
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-02 00:14:37+00:00): This changeset is being reverted to undo the damage done to the river way.  Please be much more careful when scrubbing around and changing things.
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-02 00:15:49+00:00): Reverted in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133192063
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-06 07:47:59+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10500692745/history has shop = Coffee Project that was added in this edit
shop=Coffee Project ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
Timmy_Tesseract (2026-02-06 11:57:07+00:00): Thanks for catching this, moved the value from shop to name.
user_10608625 (2023-03-06 21:11:41+00:00): Hello, just letting you now the street you marked as one way is in fact two way as of several months ago.
kvenkatl (2023-03-07 08:18:17+00:00): Hello zhodz,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and flagging out the issue. I apologize for the incorrect edit. Going forward, I'll ensure to verify the latest resources before making edits and looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
kvenkatl.
user_10608625 (2023-03-07 12:19:12+00:00): Thank you, I appreciate that!
Kovoschiz (2023-01-10 04:31:07+00:00): Please check that a short section of Wang Chiu Rd represents the taper lane gain.
CurlingMan13 (2023-01-11 06:59:19+00:00): Why do the golf holes have a name of "WC"?  They should be left blank.
Rhallela (2023-01-11 13:17:52+00:00): I didn't create the holes. I just added the handicaps with my edits. I don't know what WC means. maybe Woodcreek?
wireguy (2023-01-11 15:46:30+00:00): Rhallela, relation 5176258, the golf_course is now an unclosed multipolygon, so the course isn't rendering.   Could you tweak that?  Also several of the other multipolygon members are missing or have incorrect roles (either inner or outer).
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
djericson (2023-01-16 07:08:34+00:00): La gran mayoría de las demás vías colindantes, tienen que ser el valor highway: living_street , ya que son zonas semi-urbanas periféricas, donde el tráfico vehicular es practicamente nulo, y se hace mas uso peatonal, y de recreación de niños, y todo eso, independientemente de si son vias asfaltadas o si asfaltar, el tag residential es completamente erroneo aqui.
ovruni (2023-01-16 07:46:28+00:00): Hola djericson, en la comunidad peruana tenemos una wiki de convenciones sobre vías [0], en esta página wiki  para highway=living_street se indican limites de velocidad y que de que son usadas en clubes privados y agrupaciones vecinales. Por otra parte, revisando en la wiki de highway=living_street [1] se indican que tienen límites de velocidad más reducidos y normas especiales de tráfico, sin mencionarse si son zonas semi-urbanas periféricas.
También en la comunidad peruana tenemos un canal de telegram [2] donde solemos conversar sobre el mapeo en Perú.
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA/Convenciones
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dliving_street
[2] https://t.me/osmpe
morb_au (2023-01-12 06:17:17+00:00): This changeset appears to have deleted substantial work by me, for example:

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/14088636
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/14088638
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/15098051
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1128195544

Could you please restore?
Scottie0001 (2023-01-13 01:56:47+00:00): The use of MBRC development application as a source is not allowed as it uses CC BY 4.0 data. A waiver is required to use it however none exist for MBRC.
tbicr (2023-01-11 23:52:48+00:00): вітаю

заўважыў Вы прыбралі імя `1-ы завулак Вільчкоўскага` у вуліц w379162315 і w379162316, але дамы з дадзенай вуліцай застаюцца і вуліца прысутнічае ў кадастры

падкажыце ці няма тут якой памылкі?
tbicr (2023-01-12 23:23:06+00:00): павярнуў назву вуліцы https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131208117
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:49:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
WoodWoseWulf (2023-01-10 22:29:13+00:00): Hi Ben360,

I'm not sure that the grass out the front of a house would count as a park? Perhaps it would be better to revise the tagging to something else such as landuse=grass or landcover=grass?
Ben360 (2023-01-10 22:51:15+00:00): Ah yes, good catch :)
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-01-12 11:56:52+00:00): Hallo nortvest,

Wikipedia ist leider keine gültige Quelle für OSM (Lizenz-Problem). Bitte keine Daten von Wikipedia übernehmen!

Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Collaboration_with_Wikipedia

Gruß Roger Wilco
nortvest (2023-02-03 16:07:46+00:00): Wusste ich nicht - wird aber öfters als Quelle angegeben. 

Gruß nortvest
VictorIE (2023-01-26 06:00:26+00:00): Hi,,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1130547247

What is building=hiou ? Is it a mistake?
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 08:59:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
ljc_jlyb (2023-01-10 05:56:27+00:00): https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5c/Inner_Mongolia_Expressway_Network_Layout_2019-2030.jpg
literan (2023-01-10 20:18:33+00:00): поломали все что только можно. https://osmcha.org/changesets/131084464

откачу. такие правки не нужны
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-01-10 11:57:56+00:00): Moin saftycar,

motor_vehicle=no ist hier wahrscheinlich nicht richtig. Oder ist forstwirtschaftlicher Verkehr hier tatsächlich verboten?

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
RKCook (2023-01-11 05:33:10+00:00): I corrected this properly with change # 131129537.  The entire length in Macomb County is officially Metropolitan Parkway... However signs often say Metro Parkway... so a short name. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_Parkway_(Detroit_area)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131093265
NastassiaKalesnikava (2023-01-11 13:22:19+00:00): Hi! Thank you a lot for your correction and source for editing!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:40:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
user_11609320 (2023-01-10 07:38:27+00:00): it looks to me like a street.  if i am wrong, please change it back or let me know so can change the street back to private airport
KrzysztZ (2024-03-05 12:05:35+00:00): Lokalizacja punktu aptecznego w Sokolnikach prawidłowa, zdjąłem fixme
mcliquid (2023-01-13 14:54:38+00:00): Hi, what is the name of the hotel?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:50:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
mike140 (2023-01-10 10:17:23+00:00): Магазин займає всю будівлю, чи там є інші об'єкти?
user_5359 (2023-09-20 06:03:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your business to the right building.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:26:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Steube (2023-05-04 07:35:47+00:00): Die Kennzeichnung ist nicht ganz korrekt. Die hinteren Gebäude ("153a") sind die Bettenhäuser. Das eigentliche Hauptgebäude des Schullandheimes mit Veranstaltungs- und Seminarräumen, Küche und Caféteria ist die Nr. 153.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
SK53 (2023-01-24 14:38:45+00:00): Suspect the 200 degrees place on MIlton Street is a cafe rather than a shop (they probably do sell their coffee as well). Have changed it (as Jay was the original mapper)
Dave Venables (2023-01-24 17:08:53+00:00): Agreed. The one in Derby certainly is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5344857530 I think I was just mechanically updating fhrs:id values based on suggestions and not double checking the other existing tags. I think it is correct now https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/817267393
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-01-12 14:32:41+00:00): Har fjernet access=yes,

Det tror jeg ikke er rigtigt.
Eman_Mehrez (2023-01-18 09:32:50+00:00): Hello Asemharizi;
I noticed you changed the value in the name "tag" to English value, But the standard In Libya for naming streets should have Arabic value as it is Arab Country and the English value should be in"name:en"
Examples you changed:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/78331679
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101515772
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101515772
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/153272538
Example of a standard for street naming in Libya:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444717467
Please see this photo:
https://ibb.co/kKTQ8Vf
Could you fix this issue and let me know if you need any help?

Regards
Eman_Mehrez
eggie (2023-01-10 09:21:29+00:00): Dag HSA..

In dat geval de regel toevoegen
oneway:bicycle=no

en evt indien van toepassing ook voor moped en mofa.
Dan routeert het weer correct voor tweewielers.

MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse (2023-01-10 09:43:59+00:00): Some of the changes here look dubious.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6746 .
Xavier Fabiani (2023-01-16 21:18:22+00:00): Please elaborate.  I have 15 plus years working for the City of San Diego ....at least half of  which I was the City Council representative for Downtown and I was an East Villlage resident for 10 years at 830 Park Blvd.   I am interested to hear your qualifications
Xavier Fabiani (2023-01-16 21:50:18+00:00): The street name 12th Avenue was changed to Park Blvd at least 10 years ago by City Council.  It was changed to conform with a long planned parkway named the "Park to Bay Link" which is a City initiative to connect Balboa Park to San Diuego Bay along the former 12th Ave corridor
Xavier Fabiani (2023-01-16 21:58:58+00:00): The pedestrian bridge that has been mistakenly identified as the Harbor Drive Pedestrian Bridge has no connection to Harbor Drive.  The bridge carries Park Blvd from its southern terminus over the railroad tracks to the South Embarcadero on the San Diego Bayfront.   Look closely at the map, and you will, see an isolated section of Park Blvd south of the railroad tracks. It actually bridges a gap between two disconnected segment of Park Blvd.
Xavier Fabiani (2023-01-16 22:03:59+00:00): It seems that many ignorant OSM users are making faulty edits based upon erroneous data that appears on other maps.  Just because Google Maps shows certain street name, doesn't make it correct.  Do your research before you make any changes to the map.
SomeoneElse (2023-01-16 23:31:11+00:00): @Xavier Fabiani Thanks for replying to various questions asked at https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=10479809 , including here,
Since there seem to be different views about what some places are called, perhaps a way to resolve it would be to post a photo of the street name(s) somewhere, for example of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107952472/history ?
In this case, a picture would also help to see which of unclassified / service / pedestrian and footway was best: https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/1107952472 .
Dodko (2023-01-11 08:03:15+00:00): Takéto hromadné zmeny je potrebné robiť opatrne, podľa možnosti adresy dať do budovy ak je len jedna adresa pre celú budovu.
Neviem prečo ste pridávali tagy dont_tag_buildings a dont_tag_buildings2
Nejasnosti treba prekonzultovať na fóre https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk

Rôzne adresy nemôžu mať rovnaké ref:minvskaddress

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69058889
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69060364

Ak už existuje adresa nedulikovať ju, ale opraviť
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053309109
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118313636
MartinSNV (2023-01-11 08:13:16+00:00): Priebežne prechádzam chyby a opravujem ich, ale ak je to problém, revertnem celý changeset.
Vychádzal som z výstupu odtiaľ https://minvskaddress.freemap.sk/SK042A526355/
MartinSNV (2023-01-11 08:29:25+00:00): Akým spôsobom viem v JOSM nájsť duplicitné hodnoty ref.minvskaddress resp. addr.conscriptionnumber?
Dodko (2023-01-11 08:39:54+00:00): Duplicitné ref:minvskaddress hľadám tu https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/ref:minvskaddress#values

Tá Myslina sú v riešení, obec mlčí, tak teraz čakám na odpoveď z minv.
Dodko (2023-01-11 08:44:03+00:00): Keď je možnosť tak adresy z bodov prehodím na budovu, napríklad takto.
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=130982759
MartinSNV (2023-01-11 09:06:57+00:00): Ďakujem, priebežne to poopravujem v rámci ostatných opráv.
Dodko (2023-02-12 12:14:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118316351/history
táto budova pravdepodobne neexistuje
adresa by mala byť tu
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/ra_adresne_body/0/12581009?pos=48.942171,20.566005,18
MartinSNV (2023-02-12 12:22:49+00:00): Opravené, dik za info
kakiremora (2023-01-10 19:04:49+00:00): Czy na pewno zmieniły się granice parku? Znajdują się w nim przecież i tak np. pętla tramwajowa, drogi czy kolej.

Pozdrawiam
adas (2023-01-10 21:46:13+00:00): Ok. Cofnąłem. W sumie się sugerowałem terenem zielonym. Ale faktycznie błędnie.
H@mlet (2023-01-12 11:52:16+00:00): Bonjour,
je serais curieux de savoir pourquoi vous avez ajouté "area=yes" à la relation "golfe de gasgogne" ?
En règle générale, un chemin fermé représente une surface.
Et la clé "water" ne s'utilise que sur des surfaces.
Cordialement.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=bay
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:water
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131098050
eggie (2023-01-10 09:52:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131098233

Je hebt er een highway=service service=alley 
van gemaakt. Zo'n achteromtstraatje dat auto's bij hun achtertuin kunnen.
In de note staat Abrikozenweg
note	Deze weg bestaat tijdelijk niet meer, komt volgens bestemmingsplan Ananasweg terug als fietspad zie figuur 13 uit toelichting.
Wellicht gaat toch e.e.a. nog veranderen?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-01-10 09:54:03+00:00): access=no lijkt me niet correct... Dat betekent algemeen Verboden Toegang.
Eigenlijk zijn alle access combinaties met access=no bijna altijd fout.
eggie (2023-01-10 11:13:24+00:00): access no heb ik verwijderd. 
De straten rondom het nieuwe complex staan op access=permissive  Misschien is dat nu niet meer het geval?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-01-10 09:55:39+00:00): Dag SpacePony  Wanneer ik op m'n laatste pdok actueel kijk stond de brievenbus juiste goed.
gr eggie
archie (2023-01-10 10:29:51+00:00): Snyggt, som vanligt!!
vakal (2023-01-20 00:27:00+00:00): Stort tack! Bra jobbat själv med ditt idoga arbete!
tomhukins (2023-02-02 17:55:58+00:00): As ever, thank you for your excellent work on the map.

It seems a bit strange to tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/948297086 as building=church though.  I wonder if this happened by mistake.
Maptapper (2023-02-03 11:17:56+00:00): Great spot!

Its the Lychgate to the Church. Ill edit it in line with the wiki 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dlych_gate

Thanks
whammo (2023-01-10 11:57:39+00:00): Hi, this road should be called Blenheim Boulevard, not Old Lee Highway, which was its old name. See the news release here: https://www.fairfaxva.gov/Home/Components/News/News/12200/18. I don't know if the road signs have changed yet, but the name change went into effect on 1 January.
NastassiaKalesnikava (2023-01-10 12:18:53+00:00): Hi! I have changed the road name to Blenheim Boulevard. Thank you for comment and source for editing!
whammo (2023-01-10 22:33:37+00:00): Thank you, no problem!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131098896
Andrea Musuruane (2023-01-10 13:31:26+00:00): Ciao. Credo che i numeri civici che danno su Via Massaua siano stati inseriti con il tag addr:street errato. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131098901
ivanbranco (2023-01-10 17:06:08+00:00): Sistemato!
eggie (2023-01-10 10:59:14+00:00): Oke..  
Tip..kleun puntje.. motor_vehicle=yes hoort niet op reguliere wegen.

Mvg
Eggie
johsin18 (2023-02-24 15:39:19+00:00): I guess it should be rather destination:colour=white.  Do you remember the actual destination maybe?
cityd (2023-03-02 13:40:50+00:00): Thanks for the QA. 
Of course destination:colour=white was meant.
No, but mapillary is my/your friend, see: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=4106760256047494&focus=photo&lat=47.574599326736&lng=7.6006498586806&z=17&x=0.5694519450566915&y=0.5818288258137978&zoom=3