piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DFW-Backyard7 (2026-04-24 23:26:51+00:00): Thanks for helping keep track of surveillance tech. I fixed it this time, but when you add the nodes (presumably by pasting from the tags on the deflock example) you have to paste it into the raw text input for tags, rather than as the value of an individual tag. Basically, you have to click the `I` looking button at the top-right of the tags pane. See where the arrow points here https://deflock.org/report/id . This will ensure each key=value on each line is a separate tag, rather than all that text just being shoved into the value of one tag. Does that make sense? Let me know if you need further clarification

Also, what kind of cameras were those on Caddo Trail? Were they the normal ALPR-style flock cameras like on the example image on the deflock site? Or were they one of these flock ptz cameras: https://www.flocksafety.com/blog/stop-choosing-between-coverage-and-clarity-dual-lens-ptz-delivers-both

If it was one of those, two tags should be different: surveillance:type=camera` (rather than ALPR) and `camera:type=dome` (rather than fixed)

Thanks so much, and please keep adding them when you can!
DFW-Backyard7 (2026-04-25 01:33:14+00:00): Just checked for myself and there really are ALPRs there. What a strange decision by Frisco lol. There were some ptz cameras along the trail too which I added the rest of I think
hobbesvsboyle (2026-06-04 12:06:01+00:00): Hey, thanks for all your additions of power lines in Madison. I noticed that you used the `name` field for what should go into `ref` (like the 6908). I fixed it for the lines in this changeset.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2026-04-25 22:03:04+00:00): reverted. Please don't delete roads

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181824906
Syl (2026-07-15 06:47:00+00:00): Bonjour, j'aurais une remarque concernant les horaires ici : le jour du mois doit être sur deux chiffres, ce serait donc "01" plutôt que "1".
Je vais corriger ici en même temps que j'enlève les horaires déjà passés.
Digitaleo (2026-07-21 08:48:22+00:00): Bonjour Syl,

Merci pour le signalement, vous avez tout à fait raison : la spécification opening_hours (production <daynum>) impose le jour du mois sur deux chiffres, et notre générateur produisait « 2026 May 1 » au lieu de « 2026 May 01 ».

C'est corrigé côté Digitaleo-OSM-API : les jours sont désormais systématiquement écrits sur deux chiffres, et les règles datées dont la date est passée ne sont plus émises. Nous avons également corrigé les exemples fautifs sur notre page wiki d'import.

Merci pour votre correction manuelle sur ce nœud.

Merci encore pour votre vigilance !
Bobbi123 (2026-04-26 19:57:25+00:00): Jetzt ersthaft? Du editierst hier Infos für Feldwege durch Wälder und über Felder, ob sie beleuchtet sind? Kommt als nächsten dann noch, dass die Feldwege kein taktiles Leitsystem haben oder dass die Feldwege keine Fahrradwege daneben haben? 

Nix für Ungut, aber sowas ist wirklich absurd...
Cdr_Johannsen (2026-04-26 20:24:29+00:00): Ich bin davon ausgegangen, dass es nicht stört mehr Informationen zur Verfügung zu haben. Sollten derartige Änderungen negative Auswirkungen haben, kann ich das natürlich in Zukunft auch lassen...
Bobbi123 (2026-04-27 10:50:00+00:00): An solchen Feldwegen Informationen wie Beleuchtung, etc. hinzuzufügen ist völlib überflüssig, weil abwegig. Solche Informationen sollten nur dort editiert werden, wo sie wirklich logisch Sinn machen, also etwa an Ortsstraßen in bebauten Gebieten. Da ist es völlig legitim und auch sinnvoll. Aber nicht Eigenschaften an etwas dort hinzuzufügen, wo es überhaupt keinen Mehrwert bringt bzw. völlig logisch unnütz ist.

Leider wird OSM durch Streetcomplete von solchen unlogischen bzw. völlig überflüssigen Edits mit englischen Begründungen immer mehr geflutet, was nicht nur mir zunehmend missfällt. Aber wie gesagt: Sinnvolle Edits an dafür sinnvollen Objekten sind wichtig und immer willkommen.
Bobbi123 (2026-04-27 23:56:55+00:00): Ich habe diese wie gesagt absolut sinnlosen Daten jetzt wieder entfernt. Bitte derartige Edits künftig unterlassen.
EEP-Benny (2026-04-24 16:07:38+00:00): Zu schnell geklickt; die closed:note und das GPX-File gehören nicht zu diesem Changeset.
Quellen für die Änderungen in diesem Changeset: Ich war vor Ort, der Verlauf des Feldwegs ist vom Luftbild abgezeichnet
trigpoint (2026-04-25 10:47:51+00:00): Hello
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please remember that OpenStreetMap is a map of the world as it exists now.
Mapping things that no longer exist have no place in OpenStreetMap.

Maybe these should be added to OpenHistoricalMap.

Cheers Phil
Xeroctic (2026-04-27 08:18:58+00:00): Some of these stations were already put here; I just changed them from historic:railway=station to abandoned:railway=station. I'll probably remove a few that are known to have no traces left.
trigpoint (2026-04-27 09:43:25+00:00): Why did you change them?
Have you actually visited them to observe if there are any traces or are you trying to make them appear a certain way on a particular map?
Xeroctic (2026-04-27 10:42:38+00:00): I've mostly used the areal footage that OpenStreetMap uses in the editor, and there are pre-existing markers of former stations. Additionally, the wiki states that historic:railway=station is deprecated, and it would be more accurate to mark them as abandoned or razed (or as you mentioned, removed entirely).
Xeroctic (2026-04-27 10:44:21+00:00): Before your last reply, I removed one station and the surrounding track where no trace exists entirely (Awkwright Street in Nottingham)
trigpoint (2026-04-27 11:19:26+00:00): Thank you for your response but firstly remember that the wiki should always be taken with a large pinch of NaCl. Just because something has been written in the wiki it is not an authorisation to remove a tag from the map.
trigpoint (2026-04-27 11:22:10+00:00): I am certainly no wiki expert so am not able to work out where any discussion of depreciating this tag took place or if there was any.
itineris (2026-04-24 19:47:23+00:00): Én meghagytam volna az amenity=school-t is. Egyben, vagy kettévágva; de sárgán.
qstep (2026-04-24 19:52:40+00:00): Azt hittem, a landuse=education besárgítja, amúgy meg mapping for the renderer. Mindenesetre javítottam: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181781602
bkil (2026-04-24 22:19:01+00:00): Ezt majd meg kell néznem hétfőn, mert nem tudom mit csináltál. A név és házszám nem stimmel a honlappal mindenesetre.
qstep (2026-04-24 22:30:36+00:00): Az információkat a https://www.jankayiskola.hu/ és https://www.szlovak-bcs.edu.hu/ weboldalakról szedtem. A házszámokat említette a https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4464750 jegyzet és ugyanígy szerepelnek az iskola által közzétett Szervezeti és Működési Szabályzatban is: https://www.jankayiskola.hu/dokumentumok/SZMSZ.pdf

A HRSZ kereső szerint az egész w713107972 terület házszáma 1.

Mit hagytam ki?
mavl (2026-06-07 06:01:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183764451, 183764460, 183764431, 183764453, 183764448, 183764459, 183764455 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20768].
ilias_ (2026-04-24 22:11:07+00:00): Hello, please, don't modfiy the buildings I already mapped, they were already perfect. You tried squaring them which made them get a weird shape for some. I reverted your changeset. What I do when I try mapping buildings is I map one by one, then go to the next one, always keeping them as squared as possible. If you simply select all buildings at once and click Q, they will absolutely get a weird shape.
pnd_ku (2026-04-26 10:59:22+00:00): Got it
IvaKraljić (2026-05-07 15:55:47+00:00): The unnecessarily tagged segment has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182345896#map=18/32.408581/-93.801103. #OptimoRoute
IvaKraljić (2026-05-07 15:53:46+00:00): The restrictions have since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182345784#map=16/32.42751/-93.79151. #OptimoRoute
democat (2026-04-25 05:53:19+00:00): This changeset looks good, except you do have some crossing roads (Melody and Woodland) that don't have an intersecting node. iD has a warning for this, and it can automatically resolve it if you tell it to. I've gone ahead and fixed it myself, but in the future, make sure to check the warnings/issues pane in iD!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181774128
IvaKraljić (2026-05-07 15:45:12+00:00): The truck restrictions have been added in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182345439#map=17/32.390981/-93.800535. #OptimoRoute
george1201 (2026-04-29 21:43:44+00:00): Gibt's Michelin Boutique tatsächlich noch? Ich dachte, die machen hier alles dicht.
silberneSilbe (2026-04-29 21:52:41+00:00): Ehrlich gesagt habe ich die Tatsache, dass dort noch Logos zu sehen waren, als Beweis dafür gewertet, dass sie noch existieren. Ich habe nicht überprüft, ob die Gebäude noch genutzt werden
george1201 (2026-05-04 15:23:56+00:00): Ich habe hier keinerlei Hinweise auf einen Laden gefunden. Wo sollen die Logos sich denn befinden?
silberneSilbe (2026-05-04 15:34:37+00:00): Ich habe Logos rund um die Michelin-Boutique gesehen
george1201 (2026-05-04 18:36:31+00:00): Wo? Am Gebäude? An den Fensterscheiben? Was stand auf den Logos? Beim Eingang am Eck war kein Hinweis auf eine Boutique.
silberneSilbe (2026-05-04 19:19:43+00:00): Leider weiß ich es nicht mehr. Ich werde ein paar Fotos machen, wenn ich wieder in der Gegend bin.
george1201 (2026-05-22 20:14:59+00:00): Ich habe heute nochmal intensiv danach gesucht. Keinerlei Hinweise auf einen Laden gefunden. Ein "Pförtner" in dem Gebäude hat es mir bestätigt: Hier ist nix mehr. Ich habe den Laden auf disused gesetzt.
lukabułka (2026-04-26 17:50:39+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
IvaKraljić (2026-05-07 15:37:52+00:00): The unnecessary splits have since been merged in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182345139. #OptimoRoute
ssundell (2026-04-29 21:54:44+00:00): Mikä tässä oli virheellistä, eikö Hailuotoon kuitenkin tänäkin vuonna mennyt jäätie? Toki niissä pitäisi olla myös merkintä ice_road=yes, mutta itse tie kaiketi on ihan paikallaan?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181776188
EräsHenkilö (2026-07-26 09:51:00+00:00): Kyseinen jäätie oli jo merkitty aiemmin (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98505233), oli jo viimeisen kerran suljettu, ja tämä oli piiretty väärään kohtaan (lauttareitin kohdalle).

Sori, että vastauksessa kesti.
IvaKraljić (2026-05-07 15:33:35+00:00): The extra tags have been added in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182344931. #OptimoRoute
BCNorwich (2026-04-25 05:35:28+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OenStreetMap.

The sidewalks are mapped, the roads are tagged sidewalk=both. This indicates that there is a sidewalk both sides of the highway. Thus no need to map them again.
IvaKraljić (2026-05-07 17:40:08+00:00): The unnecessarily tagged segments have since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182350377. #OptimoRoute
iandees (2026-04-24 19:51:40+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/270971950 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181781628, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
IvaKraljić (2026-05-07 15:29:02+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182344745. #OptimoRoute
IvaKraljić (2026-05-07 15:26:03+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182344627. #OptimoRoute
user_24074784 (2026-04-25 06:14:53+00:00): Hi, you got this one very wrong! The road is not 'Disused' but closed until June due to works on the bridge. I've changed your edit to mark the road as 'Construction' 

https://www.blackpool.gov.uk/Residents/Parking-roads-and-transport/Roadworks-and-road-maintenance/Road-closures.aspx
rskedgell (2026-04-26 15:20:18+00:00): Thanks for updating that. It's no more "wrong" than changing it to highway=construction , as both imply it could be put back into use relatively easily.

Having read the yellow sign by the Parkinson Way / Yeadon Way roundabout properly (Closed 15 April until July), which is a more short-term closure than I expected, I think it would probably be better to use a cond8tional restriction. Either highway=construction or disused:highway=tertiary could adversely impact routing beyond July. I'd suggest:

highway=tertiary
access=yes
access:conditional=no @ (15 Apr 2026-26 Jun 2026)
fixme=Delete access tags when road confirmed to have reopened #surveyme

Does that look reasonable to you?
jellybeanfish (2026-04-27 20:17:50+00:00): Correction: Comment is "opened up construction and connected ways #adt"
Oier_ (2026-04-25 08:38:24+00:00): Iepa!

¡Gracias por tus contribuciones! Se nota que estás dedicando tiempo a mejorar el mapa.

Solo quería comentarte un pequeño detalle: en OpenStreetMap, las vías (caminos, senderos, etc.) normalmente no se nombran con el nombre de un GR o de un sendero señalizado. Irati 2025 o Baztan 2026 no son los nombres de la calle o via. Para eso existen las *relaciones*, que permiten agrupar varios tramos y asignarles el nombre del recorrido completo.

Te recomiendo echar un vistazo a la documentación sobre relaciones en la wiki, donde se explica muy bien cómo funcionan y cómo usarlas para este tipo de rutas.

Si tienes cualquier duda, no dudes en preguntar. Aqui estamos para aprender y contribuir juntos! ;)
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2026-04-25 21:42:42+00:00): Why was the motorway deleted?
TrickyFoxy (2026-06-16 01:16:59+00:00): Викидату зачем удалили?
mtrutman (2026-05-18 17:08:11+00:00): I understand that the exact line across the glacier changes with conditions, but I do not think the crossing should be removed completely.

- The route is part of the official Pamir Trail and is regularly used by hikers.
- Its presence on the map is important for trip planning.
- Removing the way entirely loses information about connectivity and suggests that there is no practical passage here.
- The path can be tagged for example with approximate=yes or have a note indicating that the exact alignment is not fixed. Together with sac_scale, this makes it clear that crossing requires experience and that the route should not be treated as a precisely defined path.
- In OpenStreetMap, many unmarked and informal paths are mapped when they represent commonly used routes.

For these reasons, I believe the crossing should remain mapped, with appropriate tags indicating its approximate nature.
ChristianB77 (2026-05-18 17:40:53+00:00): The Pamir Trail is unofficial in the legal sense. As for official in the sense that this is a designated alternate route on the Pamir Trail, I communicate and cooperate extensively with the Pamir Trail team, and we are all in agreement that there should be no route mapped here on ice in OSM. It is just too dangerous to have any lines on the OSM map here that people will follow on various map apps. I also spoke with a local national park ranger about this and he is also in agreement that no route should be mapped on the ice here. He and his colleagues are quite fed up with European, American and Israeli hikers getting rescued in this area.
TrickyFoxy (2026-06-16 01:18:34+00:00): И вновь удаление викдаты
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-24 19:18:23+00:00): What's going on here?
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-24 19:18:07+00:00): What's going on here?
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-24 19:17:51+00:00): What's going on here?
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-24 19:17:29+00:00): What's going on here?
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-24 19:17:03+00:00): What's going on here?
BRCKD (2026-05-26 18:51:04+00:00): Hi Mapwin, I just came across your edits. Welcome again to OSM, even if your account is from 2024.
Changeset comments are a vital way of quickly identifying what you have changed, and they have other benefits as well. It would be great if you could take a quick look at the wiki article: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Mapwin (2026-05-26 21:08:45+00:00): Hi, was not aware a out that. Took a look at the article. Makes sense to me me. Thx for pointing out.
Mapwin (2026-05-26 21:09:41+00:00): *aware about
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-24 19:16:41+00:00): What's going on here?
pyram (2026-04-24 23:36:42+00:00): Nein, das sollte man nicht als "Park" erfassen. Nimm das wieder weg - es hat eigentlich alles gepasst. (Außer dem Mapping der Bürgersteige als "Fußgängerzone" - das habe ich schon korrigiert.)

PS: Bitte nicht irgendwelche Pläne abpausen - dafür haben wir keine Genehmigung.
Krystek (2026-04-25 15:30:35+00:00): Może warto dodać tag source również do tagów poszczególnych skwerów? Byłoby wiadomo skąd się ta(m) nazwa (się) wzięła?
Gustavo22Soares (2026-04-28 00:02:13+00:00): por favor tome cuidado com edificios sobrepostos
f_gonella (2026-04-24 20:17:13+00:00): EDIT: Mappatura edifici residenziali (errore nel titolo inserito)
Lostmonkey (2026-04-25 10:05:44+00:00): Bemærk, at hvis 'description' skal bruges, må det kun indeholde neutral og faktuel information. Dvs. ikke noget, der har karakter af reklame eller anmeldelse. Feltet skal desuden ikke bruges til at gentage oplysninger, som allerede fremgår af de øvrige tags. Har derfor slettet teksten.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-12 11:03:26+00:00): Reverted SEO spam POI with advertising/nonsensical tags added with explicit source=* of Google Maps in violation of OSM policy and potentially copyright and contract law, in changeset 184011512

https://osm.org/changeset/184011512
mewhenthe (2026-05-05 20:37:08+00:00): Hello! It seems that you have added a description that is considered spam. I already went ahead and removed it. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam for extra information.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-12 14:33:38+00:00): NB, its part of a SEO spam ring of hundreds and likely thousands of accounts, that not only ignores all feedback but consistently re-adds back SEO spam advertising and nonsense tagging, as they did here to your changes in changeset 182601771

https://osm.org/changeset/182601771

Which I reverted/fixed in changeset 185594159

https://osm.org/changeset/185594159
Lostmonkey (2026-04-25 10:05:56+00:00): Bemærk, at hvis 'description' skal bruges, må det kun indeholde neutral og faktuel information. Dvs. ikke noget, der har karakter af reklame eller anmeldelse. Feltet skal desuden ikke bruges til at gentage oplysninger, som allerede fremgår af de øvrige tags. Har derfor slettet teksten.
GilesWells (2026-06-18 15:45:47+00:00): This placement is incorrect. The correct placement of the camera is already at node 12368432394. In this location is a red light camera.
Layft Greater (2026-07-02 08:57:22+00:00): Could you please re-check the route? I see some differences with GPS track published on the Visit Cyprus website.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20585712

Thank you in advance!
KonsPana81 (2026-07-02 20:08:49+00:00): Good idea. Initially I created the route following the map in their website, not the gpx. But I just updated the relation following the gpx. Now it is much better, the route avoids heavy traffic in Yermasoyia/Limassol and near Mari.
Layft Greater (2026-07-02 20:12:57+00:00): It's not my idea to put the cycling route away from traffic. 
I've just pointed out some possible mapping mistakes.

Thank you for your feedback!
Adikso (2026-04-25 19:11:56+00:00): Twoje zmiany zostały wycofane. W tym miejscu już był dodany sklep Spar, a ty dodałeś ten sklep jeszcze dodatkowe 3 razy. Usunięte zostały również podane przez ciebie godziny otwarcia "Niedziela-Piątek 06:00-20:00" jako mało prawdopodobne (biorąc pod uwagę jakość twoich edycji). 

Proszę następnym razem zwracać uwagę na to żeby nie duplikować sklepów.
eggie (2026-04-25 05:55:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
detective-fiasco (2026-04-25 16:46:34+00:00): Zdravím, mezi Kojetínem a přerovem se opravdu v jednom směru může jezdit 100 a ve druhém 200?

Pokud je to jen plánovaná rychlost, mělo by vše zůstat v tagu proposed:maxspeed.
Pravapap (2026-04-25 17:07:09+00:00): Zdravím.

Nemůže, vymyslel jsem hloupost a po propsání na web mi došlo, že jsem nezvolil vhodný přístup. Dnes večer zjednám nápravu.
detective-fiasco (2026-04-25 18:09:49+00:00): Díky za rychlou reakci!

Pokud vám šlo o renderování na webu https://openrailwaymap.app, právě jsem tam založil feature request/issue, který by snad mohl v budoucnu vyřešit tento problém: https://github.com/hiddewie/OpenRailwayMap-vector/issues/913
Pravapap (2026-04-25 18:22:42+00:00): Už jsem uploadnul opravenou verzi.

Váš návrh je super, přesně to by bylo vhodné. Zejména pak i rychlosti pro klopidla - někdo předělal Soběslav - Doubí a SudoVo na 200, i když je běžné zobrazovat rychlosti pro standardní vlaky.
detective-fiasco (2026-04-25 18:54:36+00:00): Skvěle, děkuji.

Ohledně trati do ČB: toho jsem si také všimnul, nedávno jsem na daném changesetu nechával komentář, ale autor se zatím neozval zpět.
iandees (2026-04-24 22:49:01+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11345771327 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181786294, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
lattmatt (2026-04-24 22:03:51+00:00): Rest In Peace
BCNorwich (2026-04-26 06:58:43+00:00): Hi, There are many problems/warnings stated above. I've remove your very long duplicated highway which disrupted routing. 

Regards Bernard.
nileshbarawkar (2026-04-29 06:39:13+00:00): Hi Monymehsi,
Thank you for your contribution to OSM. Could you please confirm which changes of classification you make regarding Trunk, Primary and secondary road is correct as per OSM Classification.
Thanks Again.
BCNorwich (2026-04-29 07:27:22+00:00): Hi nileshbarawkar, I made no changes to the status of the highway Way: 92943748. It was you who changed it from trunk to secondary, its original status was secondary. I merely removed the duplicate highway, Way: 1503468550 trunk road, which was placed on top of Way: 92943748

Regards Bernard.
btwhite92 (2026-04-25 00:26:45+00:00): Hello again,
Can I ask where the "Pyramid Lake Road" name comes from? There is no signposted name (aside from "State Route 445" etc) on this stretch of the highway. Locally it is referred to as "Pyramid Highway" but never heard anyone call it "Pyramid Lake Road". Doing a bit of digging it looks like abutting parcels are addressed as "Pyramid Way" and think that it would be alright to name this stretch that given that there is at least some verifiability there.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-04-25 01:04:37+00:00): It came from Wikipedia. Also, this stretch of road was originally named "Pyramid Highway," but a local removed those names since, apparently, SR 445 isn't signed north of Dolores Drive (though I was unable to locate it via Nominatim).