piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Norbert Dichter (2026-03-09 15:52:07+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Buildings that are round (huts) should be drawn r circular:

In iD: draw a triangular area over the building and use the tag Building, then correct to make the shape circular with the O key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179580250
B252697 (2026-03-09 12:07:15+00:00): I walked past earlier today and mapped the features based on what I noticed.
Source to verify this area is called Buona Vista Estate Park: https://www.onemap.gov.sg/
vmicho (2026-05-17 15:06:47+00:00): Hi. There is no 140kmh here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6105470021)
Only end of limits, 2026-05-14
Taya_S (2026-03-09 12:31:27+00:00): Reverted sockpuppet edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179583004
NeisBot (2026-03-09 12:19:18+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1486854680 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mall near university"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-17 17:33:08+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180020656
(Delete spam tags. First version)
Taya_S (2026-03-09 12:31:28+00:00): Reverted sockpuppet edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179583004
eggie (2026-03-09 15:55:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-03-09 15:56:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Ewen Hill (2026-03-19 23:12:29+00:00): Nice work on all these edits around NW Vic Jiveas!!!!
Jivesas (2026-03-23 09:07:22+00:00): Hi, thanks so much! You're a really big contributor too. Love your work haha
BCNorwich (2026-03-17 08:18:48+00:00): Duplicated highway sections removed.
eggie (2026-03-09 13:00:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Hoe kan een adres veranderen op dezelfde locatie. Zit het bedrijf nu in een ander gebouw?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-03-09 12:52:06+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/8913593558 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Digital agency office"
---
Örneğin metnin daha tarafsız ve gerçek bir versiyonu şöyle olabilir: "Dijital ajans ofisi"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-17 17:33:11+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180020668
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-03-09 12:55:07+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13629915493 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Car detailing studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-17 17:33:12+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180020672
(Delete spam tags. First version)
aixbrick (2026-03-10 06:42:16+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
"access=private" wird verwendet, wenn der Zutritt generell nur einem bestimmten Personenkreis vorbehalten ist. Das trifft bei einer öffentlichen Fußgängerzone sicherlich nicht zu.
Sofern die Beschilderung, die man hier https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.802230690653&lng=6.4834569208384&z=17&pKey=910426256468431&focus=photo sieht, noch stimmt, war das Tagging vorher korrekt: Die Straße ist eine Fußgängerzone (highway=pedestrian), es besteht eine generelle Freigabe für Radfahrer (bicycle=yes) und zu bestimmten Zeiten ist die Anlieferung erlaubt (motor_vehicle:conditional mit den Uhrzeiten).
Gruß
Langlaeufer (2026-03-10 15:14:40+00:00): ein vehicle=no (das ist ja quasi default für Fußgängerzonen) statt access=private wäre vertretbar.
Langlaeufer (2026-03-10 15:16:04+00:00): Den Rest habe ich behoben access=private ist falsch, daher gelöscht
motor_vehicle:conditional-> vehicle:conditional
aixbrick (2026-03-10 16:33:55+00:00): Danke. Ich sehe vehicle=no auch nur als Krücke. Das Problem muss im Router behoben werden.
literan (2026-03-10 19:51:37+00:00): прекратите вносить всякую ересь в карту, уже не первый раз вас просил. правьте у себя в песочнице.
eggie (2026-03-09 13:12:56+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.
Bedankt voor uw toevoeging. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
wolfgang8 (2026-03-09 12:59:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179584438
aixbrick (2026-03-10 06:42:48+00:00): Mein Kommentar aus https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179584388 gilt auch hier.
Frans S (2026-03-09 13:23:31+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings
A: Inaccurate mapping. 
C: Collected adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.
G: Included the shadow of the building.


Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179584605
Layft Greater (2026-05-11 12:47:14+00:00): Roads with names cannot be service roads. Did you wanted to limit vehicle access? 


https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55787141
Metauro (2026-05-11 16:44:50+00:00): Hi Layft Greater, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
Metauro (2026-05-15 08:21:56+00:00): Hi Layft Greater,
Thank you for making the corrections. Seems like I have misinterpreted the situation, and I agree with your comment. I will ensure greater awareness on similar situations.
Wildsharky (2026-03-13 06:05:41+00:00): Revert of 179585258
PPete2 (2026-03-13 08:55:47+00:00): Bitte bei Reverts immer dazuschreiben: Warum hast du diesen CS revertiert?
PPete2 (2026-03-17 11:05:37+00:00): @Wildsharky: bitte um Erklärung, ansonsten könnte man deinen Revert wieder revertieren.
NeisBot (2026-03-09 13:25:45+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 34 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/38485850 v24 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/421515936 v9 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/709592418 v7 | 4 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179585412
MappingMore (2026-03-11 07:08:00+00:00): Revert of 179572932
mueschel (2026-03-15 13:14:45+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
You used many tags like "adega" in your edits.
This might be a good description of the object, but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand it. Only tags that are described in the wiki or are available in the presets of the editor should be used.

Would you mind checking these tags and change them to documented ones? Let us (e.g. on the forums) know if you need help!
iandees (2026-03-09 13:39:09+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
jellyfish twink (2026-03-09 15:12:03+00:00): @iandees Oops! Thank you for correcting
BlackyP8 (2026-03-16 21:35:44+00:00): Hallo Kramer24,

der Weg 1486867798 (an der Reithalle) hat noch keine Eigenschaften bekommen, würden Sie das bitte prüfen und ergänzen?

LG
BlackyP8
mueschel (2026-03-16 10:51:21+00:00): Hi,
is the "oha" tag here meant to  be "cables"?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13630002338#map=19/43.788475/6.647307
InfosReseaux (2026-03-16 11:10:51+00:00): Oh no, that's phases=*

I fix this, thanks for noticing
NeisBot (2026-03-09 13:52:18+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13502640532 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Insurance office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-09 17:51:41+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you added the text again that was previously flagged as potentially promotional and removed after a previous review. Could you please explain why you reintroduced it?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-21 04:09:42+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted adding duplicate SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186094411
B252697 (2026-03-09 13:52:11+00:00): There is something very wrong about the way these footpaths have been drawn. Logically, it wouldn't make sense for the footpaths from SkyPark Arena@Holland to cut right into Ulu Pandan Road, Pandan Valley, and the other condos. At least in Singapore, we don't see footpaths awkwardly cutting into roads and condos in that manner. Most condos are private access and won't allow that either.
EleGlobe (2026-03-12 05:21:13+00:00): Does the buses for this route that begins in Hastings start from Havelock North after finishing Bus Route 1s that ends in Arataki? There is no Buses that run down Karanema Drive as it isn't part of this or any route unless they use this before picking up passengers at the first stop, which I interpret that this is what you're implying. If they don't but could drive down to realign to Route 11n, then this shouldn't be marked as it isn't a Active Route known to be In Service like others which what is usually marked on OSM.
EleGlobe (2026-03-16 03:00:01+00:00): I'll give you till this Friday to reply back, otherwise I'll revert it Saturday NZT.
norgis (2026-07-21 19:25:04+00:00): It seems DoubleA might have edited this yet again without providing answers or explanations as usual?
EleGlobe (2026-07-23 08:50:21+00:00): Don't worry about it as the issue is resolved & I fixed it back to where the route starts at it's first bus stop. DoubleA's edit began at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3942727795 went via Karanema Drive to Hastings Library where it starts. I assume we don't add where the Bus drives when Not In Service like from Depots or transitioning routes before starting their Service, which is standard.
Hervé TUC (2026-03-09 14:11:08+00:00): Bonjour,

Bah on a l'air tout bon !👍
PikaMap (2026-03-09 14:12:57+00:00): Merci :)
Dimacn (2026-03-10 03:43:10+00:00): Спасибо за уточнение карты. Но у вас неточности по адреске. Например: Совхозная улица 40/2,  Советская улица 4/2, Центральная улица 42/1 - это двухквартирные дома на двух хозяев, там лучше ставить или просто номер на весь дом (без квартир), или обе квартиры по отдельности. А вы ставите одну квартиру на весь дом - это ошибка. К сожалению, таких домов вы отметили в Усть-Порозихе довольно много, и видимо не только здесь. Кто будет исправлять? Ссылки на эти домики: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/512377328  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/512377416  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/512377926
desk77 (2026-03-10 08:32:19+00:00): Добрый день! Исправил.
Dimacn (2026-03-10 10:47:01+00:00): Простите, ещё в этих правках множественные подобные адреса были добавлены: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179585650  и  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179585759
desk77 (2026-03-10 11:26:34+00:00): И здесь поправил.
MappingMore (2026-03-12 08:52:25+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179742854
TinPetreković (2026-03-25 13:30:50+00:00): Accidentally tagged restriction was removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180407633
rohieb (2026-03-09 18:34:14+00:00): Hallo hb-, kannst du bitte kleinere Changesets machen, die besser zu reviewen sind? Gerade wenn du Kartennotizen bearbeitest, lohnt sich für die Nachvollziehbarkeit schon ein Changeset pro Notiz und Link auf diese in der Beschreibung. Außerdem schreibst du hier nur was von "Globus-Markt", dein Changeset macht aber noch sehr viel mehr…

Weitere Infos dazu im Handbuch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
rohieb (2026-03-09 18:36:31+00:00): Und wo hast du den Namen "Ziegeleiteich" für https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4309727 her? Da habe ich mich durch jede Menge Quellen gewälzt und keiner davon hatte einen Namen dafür. Der eigentlich Ziegeleiteich ist weiter östlich. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23369427
Hb- (2026-03-10 00:38:15+00:00): In Querum gab es zwei Ziegeleien, diese gegenüber vom Bahnhof und die andere an der Bevenroder Straße. Beide hatten eine eigene Tongrube.

In den Bebauungsplänen QU53 und QU27 ist dieser "See" als "Ziegeleiteich" bezeichnet.  Angesichts der Größe und des besonderen Ziegeleiteisches im Osten ist eine Klarstellung in Ziegeleisee angebracht.
Hb- (2026-03-10 01:33:11+00:00): Insgesamt wohl drei Ziegeleien: die erste in der Mitte des Querumer Pass an der heutigen Abzweigung Forststraße von der Bevenroder Straße
Hb- (2026-03-10 01:34:24+00:00): Die zweite an der Forststraße gegenüber vom Bahnhof. Die dritte und jüngste dann am späteren Naturdenkmal.
rohieb (2026-03-10 23:34:23+00:00): Danke, ich glaube, das reicht mir als Quelle. Die Bebauungspläne gibt es im Geoportal: https://geoportal.braunschweig.de/WebOfficeNet/synserver?project=FRISBI_FLEX&client=flex&view=Bebauungsplanauskunft
Wildsharky (2026-03-13 06:04:28+00:00): Revert of 179557022
NG218 (2026-03-20 01:18:27+00:00): I did not spot any ALPR device in that intersection. What is there is a standard traffic camera. Be sure to reference the deflock.me for images on existing ALPRs.

What's most commonly found on intersections like these are the white Genetecs and black Motorolas, with one node face away from the intersection in each direction.
vectorial8192 (2026-03-09 14:44:25+00:00): The goal is to fix e.g. GraphHopper not able to enter these roads. A common reason for this is confusing turn restrictions that make some roads "impossible" to navigate to.
kingkingHK (2026-03-10 03:18:41+00:00): What "routing impossibility" is happening? Also, I don't think https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20302617 exists.
vectorial8192 (2026-03-10 12:59:08+00:00): I was trying to see how GraphHopper performs when I ask about a path going through Route 7, but I later remembered GraphHopper by default no longer snaps to bridges so it seemingly cannot navigate to/through Pung Loi Road.

Re the quoted relation, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1807461/history/2
kingkingHK (2026-03-10 13:37:29+00:00): Yes, GraphHopper cannot snap to bridges and tunnels. What does re-doing turn restrictions do?

I doubt the original turn restriction is correct. Can't see any double solid lines on aerial imagery.
Bienson (2026-03-10 01:02:10+00:00): Ganz weirdes Multipolygon erzeugt hier.
Und auch hier sind diese Wege öffentlich zugänglich für Fußänger?
Mathias_ADAV (2026-03-17 14:23:47+00:00): Bonjour,
ne devrait on pas passer ce chemin en voie verte highway = path accessible au riverain et agriculteur ? Il y a bien un panneau voie verte d'un coté et B7b de l'autre.
markalex- (2026-03-09 19:13:01+00:00): Looks good.
Also updated building outline, since it was rebuilt. But service/living roads behind it need survey.
Bienson (2026-03-10 01:03:28+00:00): surface=metal ???
Bienson (2026-03-10 01:04:37+00:00): Öffentlich zugänglich für Füßgänger?
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-10 13:24:03+00:00): Nein. Ist korrigiert.
Bienson (2026-03-10 01:05:35+00:00): Öffentlich zugänglich für Fußgänger?
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-10 13:18:29+00:00): Nein. Ist geändert.
trallalallalaa (2026-03-09 15:18:37+00:00): Una nota:
Como hay distintas opiniones si la conexión actual entre Fuencaliente y Los Llanos, pasando por carreteras con 3 cifras, se debería clasificar como highway=primary o como highway=secondary, aún no he recuperado la clasificación de changeset  #164941301, que me parecía correcta.
Bienson (2026-03-10 01:09:46+00:00): Widerspricht den access-Tags des Zufahrtsweges
NeisBot (2026-03-09 15:25:06+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1486887820 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Autoverhuur locatie"
---
For eksempel kunne en mere neutral og faktuel udgave af din tekst være: "Biludlejningssted"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
eggie (2026-03-09 16:12:40+00:00): Info samengevoegd met node
eggie (2026-03-09 16:25:28+00:00): Feedback  
Alle begin is moeilijk... 
Hier tekende je een gebouw op een gebouw.
De info staat nu op de adresnode.
Bestaat autobedrijf Martens hier nog wel? 

MVG
eggie
Frans S (2026-04-23 10:12:20+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not tag a highway "residential" when it just goes through a rural area.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1486887990/history

Best regards
Frans S (2026-04-23 10:13:19+00:00): btw. It is not more than a path.
Check the width of a trace before you tag it.
Best regards
MappingMore (2026-03-11 08:35:51+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 179678976; 179680860
Bienson (2026-03-10 01:10:08+00:00): Öffentlich für Fußgänger zugänglich?
Bienson (2026-03-10 01:10:58+00:00): surface=metal ???
Bienson (2026-03-10 01:12:20+00:00): Öffentlich zugänglich für Fußgänger? Außerdem auch wohl keine Straßenfläche.
NeisBot (2026-03-09 15:39:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/272919339 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto rental office"
---
For eksempel kunne en mere neutral og faktuel udgave af din tekst være: "Biludlejningskontor"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
eggie (2026-03-09 16:08:37+00:00): Je verwijdert steeds de  buildingtag? 
Graag de adresnode gebruiken om op bij te taggen
eggie (2026-03-09 16:10:34+00:00): Gebouw hersteld
aTarom (2026-03-09 18:56:53+00:00): hola, el
"access:temporary"
ya se entiende con el 
vehicle:conditional=no @ (2026 Mar 03-Aug 31)
no?
saludos
Jorisbo (2026-03-10 06:45:46+00:00): High aTarom, you are right, the access:temporary is an easy way the find and recheck conditional access after the conditions have changed back to normal. Kind regards, Joris
Hugoren Martinako (2026-03-10 08:51:25+00:00): Fully unnecessary the creation of shortcuts tags to check out more complex ones
Jorisbo (2026-03-10 09:20:47+00:00): Hello Martinako thx for your comment, which could be interpreted as unneccesary as well since its free to anyone to create unlimited new tags for new purposes and new situations by its best intentions. Thx for your many contributions to osm, Happy mapping , kind regards Joris
Hugoren Martinako (2026-03-10 11:06:44+00:00): Sure you're free to do so! Likewise local community may consider the key as useless, since there are not-so-complicated ways to parse restrictions as "no @ (2026 Mar 03-Aug 31)"
Bienson (2026-03-10 01:14:40+00:00): Wieso gibt es hier neben der Friedhofsverwaltung 6 "Straßenflächen" mit den identischen Tags? Und auch hier sind diese öffentlich zugänglich für Fußgänger?
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-10 13:07:45+00:00): ist behoben.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2026-03-09 15:44:26+00:00): With help of https://revert.osmz.ru/12215
NeisBot (2026-03-09 15:46:10+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/271926335 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Autoverhuurlocatie"
---
For eksempel kunne en mere neutral og faktuel udgave af din tekst være: "Autoverhuurlocatie"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
eggie (2026-03-09 16:06:02+00:00): Beste.. Ook hier verwijder je het gebouw?
eggie (2026-03-09 16:07:53+00:00): Gebouw hersteld... Alle info verplaatst naar adresnode
Description verwijderd
Gr eggie