piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
LySioS (2024-05-07 20:12:22+00:00): Bonjour,j'ai rajouté les informations commerciales de neowheels, notamment que vous étiez un commerce, cela devrait donc apparaitre sur la carte.
N'hésitez pas à compléter la carte de Trévillach ou à simplement laisser des notes que je ou d'autres pourront traiter, les petits villages sont souvent très mal cartographiés.
Bonne continuation
Glassman (2024-05-06 18:33:15+00:00): #TIP: square building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150904448
Glassman (2024-05-06 18:34:25+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150904635
Glassman (2024-05-06 18:38:15+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150904635
Євгеній913 (2024-05-05 05:08:38+00:00): Помилка, рішення виконкому №65
aharvey (2025-01-21 10:32:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1279812527

I think calling this a building is a stretch. I believe it should be waterway=drain which I'm tried to document at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sydney_Water#Sewage_Network
❤️‍🔥 (2025-01-21 11:58:57+00:00): sounds good, man_made=tunnel is the only other opinion I can think of , but its also not perfect
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-05 07:22:30+00:00): Hello, welcome. This isn't a beach.
0235 (2025-08-16 18:14:09+00:00): It is possible the South runway is still open, this travel vlogger visited some time in the past few months, and it really looks like they are landing at the southern airstrip.

Timestamp in the link

https://youtu.be/jc87jouWRFg?si=AALR2VcpgPZrYubY&t=506
0235 (2025-08-16 18:16:29+00:00): And re-watching you can see the radome off to the left of the aircraft when landing.
emvee (2024-05-05 12:31:25+00:00): Toch weer fout gegaan, net zoals in een latere changeset, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150913137, waarvan ik inmiddels de problemen zelf heb opgelost.

Voorlopig zie ik nog niet hoe het een probleem is met wat ik doe, ik vond een probleem voor een weg die ik had gesplitst maar daar liepen 2 routes over, de ene miste het nieuwe stuk na splitsen, de andere niet...

Ik ga proberen een z'n probleem te vinden als ik de wijziging maak, als dat lukt en het is reproduceerbaar dan kan er iets aan gedaan worden.
dvdhoven (2024-05-05 18:15:40+00:00): Hallo Martin,

Bedankt voor je commentaar,
Bedankt ook dat je er nog een keer naar wilt kijken.
Aan de andere steek er ook niet teveel effort in. Ik repareer wel.
Maar is het is wel vervelend, vooral voor jou, je hebt iets dat iets niet goed doet, maar hoe krijg je dat weer goed?

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
BobBobuck (2024-05-10 05:48:33+00:00): Walkways between graves in cemeteries should not be tagged Bicycles=yes or Horses=yes. The paths should also be "Walkways".

Please change all the paths you have added.
eggie (2024-05-05 07:31:56+00:00): Hi iswrong..

Please Use the present addressnode..

Greetz...
eggie
eggie (2024-05-05 08:05:00+00:00): I merged your info with the present addressnode.
Funny The postcode is wrong here and also the spelling of the townname  on their website!
http://brasseriemeer.nl/
Lopppersum?
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=marktplein+3+loppe&objectId=0024200000166441&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=245547.74&geometry.y=594808.612&zoomlevel=15
gr eggie
user_8655426 (2024-05-06 04:22:12+00:00): こんにちは。
この変更セットで追加された「水域」は、航空画像では噴水(小さな池)のように見えます。他のマッパーさんもそのように判断されたようです。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150529088

この natural=water の実態はなんですか？
azakh-world (2024-05-06 09:09:56+00:00): Добрый день.

Маршрут не может являться членом одновременно двух мастер-маршрутов. Пока выключил мастер-маршруты модификацией тегов.
luiswoo (2024-05-05 09:35:59+00:00): Это транзитная дорога до Ермаковской.
user_12458445 (2024-05-05 15:20:35+00:00): транзитной она не может быть - там нет сквозных дорог, доводил бы уже до центра станицы, че бросать на полпути
luiswoo (2024-05-05 22:31:43+00:00): Она транзитная\подъездная от шоссе до НП, она не должна быть "сквозной" в этом случае.
luiswoo (2024-05-05 22:38:47+00:00): Не я эти правила придумал и читал их давно — до нп должна вести дорога транзитного уровня, даже если это грунтовка через поле. Подробней можно выяснять в чате ruosm или на форуме, если вики не нравится.
user_12458445 (2024-05-07 12:49:47+00:00): я понимаю, что правила на коленке состряпаны, но логика тоже должна быть - вики не читал не понимаю там не фига прострактность эту - а про чат какой-то увы читаю впервые
luiswoo (2024-05-07 16:27:37+00:00): Не читал, но осуждаю… https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_tagging_samples/out_of_town — дорога имеет "административный статус", то что в РФ такая дорога может быть просёлком — это проблема РФ, в данном случае костыль.
user_8655426 (2024-05-07 09:25:35+00:00): こんにちは。
OpenStreetMap は現在、実際に存在する地物をマッピングするプロジェクトです。架空の地物を追加したり、既存のデータを実際とは異なるものに変更したりしないでください。よろしくお願いします。(事実と異なる不正な編集を行ったユーザーは、ブロックされる可能性があります。)

・「ようこそ！」
https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome

・JA:破壊行為
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:破壊行為

・Beware of fake beaches (Pokémon Go) (偽のビーチに注意してください。ポケモン GO)
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/beware-of-fake-beaches-pokemon-go/112413

---

・JA:初心者ガイド
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:初心者ガイド

・learnOSM (ビギナーズガイド)
https://learnosm.org/ja/beginner/

---

・JA:Tag:natural=beach (砂浜)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:natural%3Dbeach

・JA:Tag:natural=sand (砂地)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:natural%3Dsand

・JA:Key:playground (公園などの砂場)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:playground#Sand_play_devices
user_8655426 (2024-05-08 11:12:14+00:00): Reverted
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151009285
yrtimiD (2024-05-07 21:50:10+00:00): Hello and welcome!
Small note: building should have a name tag only if this is an official name. In your case address housenumber and the street are enough. You can even omit the country since it can be easily calculated from location.
yrtimiD (2024-05-07 21:53:57+00:00): Hello and welcome again. Here you could join these two ways onto single one since they both have same properties. Editors usually have the "join" command
NieWnen (2024-05-05 10:33:22+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tych danych? Skąd wiesz, że w tych miejscach akurat znajdują się wejścia do budynku?
NieWnen (2024-05-05 10:34:36+00:00): I nie chodzi mi o te wnękowe, a głównie o:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11880707693
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11880707692
joost schouppe (2024-05-06 08:04:26+00:00): Kan het zijn dat je way/1105473450 per ongeluk hebt verwijderd?
Eebie (2024-05-06 21:04:04+00:00): Het gewiste landhuis is terug geplaatst.
silversurfer83 (2024-05-05 19:02:33+00:00): Gude :)

könntest du vielleicht beim nächsten Mal, wenn du 397 ways und 1908 nodes anfasst etwas detaillierter schreiben, was du tust? Wäre super, danke.

happy mapping
silversurfer83
Langlaeufer (2024-05-07 13:37:16+00:00): Hallo Hockie,

ich habe den linken Radweg wieder entfernt. Er war laut Fotos vor kurzem noch von Labberstr bis Ortsschild als Gehweg mit Radverkehr frei beschildert. Das sidewalk:left:bicycle hattes du auch nicht entfernt.

Allerdings scheint mir der Radweg von nordend kommend am Ortsschild nicht aufgehoben zu sein, sodass er für diese Fahrer wohl bis zur Labberstr. benutzungspflichtig wäre. Hast du da aktuellere Erkenntnisse.

Grüße
Langläufer
hockie (2024-05-07 16:23:32+00:00): Ich weiß nur noch so viel, dass der Fussweg auf der Westseite der Sebbenhausener Str. ab Seehofstr. Richtig norden von Radfahrern benutzt werden soll (Weserradweg). In der Seehofstr. steht ein Schild das dies besagt. Auf die östliche Seite habe ich in dem Moment nicht geachtet.
Langlaeufer (2024-05-07 19:35:47+00:00): Ich würde sagen "benutzt werden darf" https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=593081192039401&focus=photo&lat=52.728911699972&lng=9.1884995&z=17&x=0.26260600676276974&y=0.5403525689801967&zoom=0

Ist aber korrekt eingetragen.
hockie (2024-05-08 13:46:26+00:00): Hier https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=5408169062607742&focus=photo&lat=52.7289911&lng=9.18924979999997&z=17&x=0.12292231683783589&y=0.5022285031672227&zoom=3 steht die Bitte um Benutzung der anderen Straßeseite, wenn man in Richtung Hoya fahren will. Ist es sinnvoll dieses Schild ebenfalls einzutragen?
Langlaeufer (2024-05-08 15:01:10+00:00): Hat verkehrsrechtlich keine Relevanz zumal die verkehrsschilder 239+1022-10 bedeuten, dass man im Normalfall die Fahrbahn nutzen sollte.

Wäre der fußweg seperat erfasst wúrde ich aber vermutlich die radroute auf den Fußweg legen.
iswrong (2024-05-05 08:34:08+00:00): Also see: https://www.facebook.com/gerwarinkmuziek
aTarom (2024-05-05 10:25:03+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, aparece este tag
hipped=along
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1279846078/history
no domino el tema 3D, es correcto? es para tenerlo en cuenta como válido o no en siguientes revisiones de tags nuevos
Saludos y feliz mapeo
Hufkratzer (2024-05-05 14:37:43+00:00): Hi,
was ist denn https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1279853115? Auf den Luftbildern kann ich nichts sehen, aber von der Größe her vermute ich, dass es wahrscheinlich ein Reitplatz ist wie z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/410114894. Sollte dann anders getaggt werden, vgf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
eggie (2024-05-05 09:44:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-05-05 14:52:54+00:00): Dag GertJan  Je hebt twee paden over elkaar heen getekend.
Eén staat op slot met access=no en is door een medemapper ingetekend als een dijkpad en jouw pad slingert daar overheen. Zie foutmeldingen. Wat klopt er nu wel of niet?
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway
  	1


  warnings:crossing_ways:highway-waterway
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-05 14:54:48+00:00): Het gaat dus over het pad dat van oost naar west loopt en waar je pad vanuit het noorden op uitkomt.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=150910570&zoom=15&lat=53.40285&lon=6.08581&layers=B000000TTTFT
Taya_S (2024-05-05 19:41:36+00:00): Hallo GertJan,

Ik heb de dubbele paden verwijderd. Ook heb ik de ontbrekende brug toegevoegd aan dat noordelijke stukje. 

Groeten,
Taya
MichaelFS (2024-05-05 14:45:41+00:00): Hallo, bezieht sich der ReviewRequest auf diese Bank https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11880882072?
Dort würde ich die Farbe brown statt natur bevorzugen, natur könnte auch grün sein ...
hweink (2024-05-05 15:03:58+00:00): Ja, darfst du gerne ändern
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-23 11:12:59+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11880894969/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
hockie (2025-04-23 16:05:52+00:00): Node korrigiert in man_made=monitoring_station

Vielen Dank für den Hinweis!
luiswoo (2024-05-05 09:31:24+00:00): Это транзитная дорога до Ермаковской.
user_12458445 (2024-05-05 12:13:09+00:00): Если это транзитная дорога - то ее как бы надо заводить в саму станицу, а не оставлять в огородах
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-05 09:40:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1279857833

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Dodko (2024-05-06 08:49:58+00:00): Ak duplikujete budovy nemôže na nich ostať pôvodná adresa, teraz je rovnaká na 4 domoch.
eufive (2025-10-11 05:52:26+00:00): Hello! I want to ask, are you sure that the correct street class for those with permissive access would be highway=residential and not highway=pedestrian? In my opinion, according to the TotG principle, the streets which are made available for visiting are pedestrian right now
Layft Greater (2025-10-11 06:55:41+00:00): Yes, these are residential.

There are some categories vehicles that can access those streets

TotG applies.
eufive (2025-10-16 07:00:05+00:00): Thanks for your quick response! I don’t want to argue, but I’m pretty sure some streets should be reclassified as pedestrian as for now. 

According to the wiki, 

> highway=residential tag is used on roads that provide access to, or within, residential areas.

> highway=pedestrian is a road or area designated mainly or exclusively for pedestrians. Often found in shopping areas, town centres, places with tourism attractions and recreation/civic areas.

I absolutely agree that most of the Varosha ways are indeed used to be residential. Moreover you did a great job of refining access tags with conditionals on all these ways, and most routers would easily navigate them now. 

At the same time I believe it’s very important to distinguish the few streets which were recently made open for the public. Right now they are not used as a part of a residential area. For better or worse, right now they function as tourism attractions inside of the overall restricted area. That’s why I mentioned the TotG in that context.

Overall these several streets became very different from the surrounding streets by their current use, and I find the pedestrian tag fits here perfectly. 

Apart from being more relevant to the factual situation, this change would also help casual map users easier see the current state of things on most of the renderers. 

If you agree with these points, I would happily replace “residential” tag with “pedestrian” for the affected ways, while preserving your amazing edits on access and time conditionals. 

Thanks again!
Layft Greater (2025-10-20 19:41:59+00:00): Hello eufive!

Thank you for your detailed response.

We are not mapping specifically for renderers or routers, so that shouldn’t be the main focus here.

I agree that publicly accessible areas are indeed tourism attractions, and it makes sense to tag them accordingly.

Regarding residential versus pedestrian classification: I guess most of the area isn't currently occupied by residents and is mainly accessible on foot or by bicycle, but not by motor vehicles. In that case, marking those areas as highway=pedestrian seems appropriate.

However, I would suggest keeping highway=residential for areas where motor vehicle access is allowed, even if only by permit.
johsin18 (2024-12-24 13:38:25+00:00): This changeset turned an important residential road (street) into a cycleway basically.  Not so great.
johsin18 (2024-12-24 13:50:08+00:00): Bayerstraße, Blauenstraße and Schusterinstel partly werde pretty much removed from the map :-(
I have repaired this again.  Please avoid such large changesets where such mistakes can be overlooked.
paulbrunner (2024-12-25 11:12:57+00:00): Hi johsin18,
thanks for catching my mistake and fixing it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160576626.

I looked at my original changeset again with https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=150911483 and from what I see, you have corrected everything that was wrong.

Happy mapping,
Paul
geoaria (2024-08-09 08:10:03+00:00): در تغییرات در چهاراه 25 آبان ، شما باعث حالت چزیره در کوچه ها شده اید یک مسیر ماشین رو را پیاده رو کرده اید بدون توجه به کوچه هایی که به آن متصل هستند. در هنگام ادیت نقشه سعی کنید نقشه را تخریب نکنید.
SomeoneElse (2024-05-05 09:46:09+00:00): ... although "Showground Ringway" IS used as a path name on some paths around here - needs further survey (which would be an excuse to sample the beer).
mga_geo (2024-05-24 07:08:55+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi avez-vous ajouté des attributs type=route et route=bus à la relation 2364296
Marc
HaPe-CZ (2024-05-27 10:11:22+00:00): Ahoj, bohužel to nemohu na ploše najít. Možná chyba nebo omyl.
SomeoneElse (2024-05-05 09:56:39+00:00): Roosters have bought Daleside, and there were Daleside vans in Roosters' car park (southeast of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11880910004 ) yesterday, so I'm not sure how much activity there is on this site now.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-07-25 18:50:01+00:00): Cześć, 
co miałeś na myśli z tagowaniem ul. Żółtej? Na jakich mapach ona jest wyrysowana? Skąd wytrzasnąłeś, że taka wirtualna droga ma powierzchnię nieutwardzoną, twierdząc przy tym, że ona nie istnieje? 

Jeśli jest ona w MPZP, to skąd miała by nazwę? Przecież projektowanym drogom nie wyznacza się nazwy, musi być najpierw uchwała.
PedroMTG13 (2024-05-05 10:24:10+00:00): https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=41.1801286&lon=-8.6558696&zoom=18&camera.theta=46.719&camera.phi=-9.167
Glassman (2024-05-06 18:41:43+00:00): I removed the surface=dirt tag since the surface isn't dirt - at least the last time I was there it wasn't.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150913069
emvee (2024-05-05 11:54:42+00:00): Deze changeset had triggerde problemen in knoopuntnet die zijn gerepareerd via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150916510

Ik ben proberen te begrijpen hoe de problemen geïntroduceerd worden, de route mist een segment dat is ontstaan door het splitsen van een weg maar wat is vreemd is dat ik zeker een keer heb gezien dat 1 route die de gesplitste weg gebruikte gebroken is maar een andere die dezelfde weg gebruikte niet.
NieWnen (2024-05-05 10:31:53+00:00): Dodawanie bram przyczepionych do tylko do landuse'a bez płotu/ściany (tag barrier) /ścieżki (tag highway) nie ma zbyt wiele sensu.
silversurfer83 (2024-05-05 19:06:29+00:00): Hi :)

was genau soll das denn für eine Örtlichkeit sein? Ein Flurname ist es nicht und auch auf der Digitalen Topografischen Karte taucht er nicht auf.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150913833
Andrea Musuruane (2024-05-05 16:53:13+00:00): Ciao. Grazie per la correzione. I numeri civici che si affacciano su questo tratto di strada (10, 12, 14) sono ancora attuali? Al momento sono inseriti come affacciati su Via Cristoforo Colombo e non seguono la progressione dei civici di Via Giulio Monteverde. Grazie, Andrea
Filippo83 (2024-05-11 19:33:37+00:00): Purtroppo i numeri civici sembrano relativi a via colombo, quindi probabilmente la mia correzione è errata. Il tratto è probabilmente da considerarsi via colombo, via monteverde riprende oltre il secondo incrocio dove ci sono civici effettivamente segnalati anche dal cartello stradale come via monteverde. In altre parole il comune ha fatto un gran pasticcio con i numeri civici delle nuove unità immobiliari, non tenendo in considerazione che questo tratto era preesistente la creazione di Via Colombo ed appunto era via Monteverde. Saluti
James Pain (2024-05-11 12:03:45+00:00): This might have been misguided in retrospect. I'm not happy with the GPS traces I based this on. I'm going to do a survey in the next 3 months to validate or fix this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150914914
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-05-05 11:55:43+00:00): Hi and welcome! 

You don't have to add names to everything. Paths usually don't have names. Mostly, we try to keep things more or less in sync with Maa-amet (land board) and road registry in Estonia. 

With exceptions when there are signs on the ground which specify the name of a path or a forest path having a distinct name from being a known trail for training or being advertised with such name. I guess Peedu kergliiklustee along the tracks nearby is one of such cases.

Consider removing Tuletõrje and Oja names from paths.
johaeha (2024-05-06 16:46:34+00:00): Hello, thank you for explaining this and I'll remove the names.
Intrinsical (2024-05-05 11:37:53+00:00): additional source: USGS 3D Elevation Program
burrscurr (2025-05-04 06:26:12+00:00): Hi Oderradler, 

nur um kurz sicherzugehen, die Gubener Straße (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182837202/history) ist wirklich nicht mehr für Radfahrer im Gegenverkehr freigegeben? In der Vergangenheit scheint das noch der Fall gewesen zu sein. (oneway:bicycle=no heißt, dass die Einbahnstraßenregelung _nicht_ für Radfahrer gilt, die EB also in Gegenrichtung freigegeben ist, während oneway:bicycle=yes eigentlich nur noch mal bestärkt, was durch oneway=yes schon ausgesagt wird, nämlich dass hier eine Einbahnstraße ist, die für alle Verkehrsteilnehmer gilt.)

VG
burrscurr
treestryder (2024-05-05 16:42:06+00:00): For routing, please connect the river's way where it crosses the edges of its areas.
Also, for routing and other reasons, I prefer to use multiple connected areas over giant relations. See how the Grand River has been mapped as an example.

The Michigan wiki page has a common tagging cheat-sheet and monthly meeting information.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan
tekim (2024-05-10 14:29:57+00:00): reverting fake edit - not parks

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151149788
user_8655426 (2024-05-07 09:15:43+00:00): こんにちは。OpenSteetMap (OSM) へようこそ。
OSM は現在、実際に存在する地物をマッピングするプロジェクトです。架空の地物を追加したり、既存のデータを実際とは異なるものに変更したりしないでください。よろしくお願いします。(事実と異なる不正な編集を行ったユーザーは、ブロックされる可能性があります。)

・「ようこそ！」
https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome

・JA:破壊行為
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:破壊行為

・Beware of fake beaches (Pokémon Go) (偽のビーチに注意してください。ポケモン GO)
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/beware-of-fake-beaches-pokemon-go/112413

---

・JA:初心者ガイド
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:初心者ガイド

・learnOSM (ビギナーズガイド)
https://learnosm.org/ja/beginner/

---

・JA:Tag:natural=beach (砂浜)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:natural%3Dbeach

・JA:Tag:natural=sand (砂地)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:natural%3Dsand

・JA:Key:playground (公園などの砂場)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:playground#Sand_play_devices
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150916203
user_8655426 (2024-05-08 11:10:31+00:00): Reverted
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151008792
Đuro Jiří (2025-03-06 16:50:21+00:00): Scusami trail-blazer,
però man_made=water_tap hai aggiunto solo per sbaglio, oppure lì c'è una fontanella?
trail-blazer (2025-03-07 02:20:35+00:00): Hi Duro Jiri,

If I remember correctly, there was a tap there. Not a fountain, but a small one.
Đuro Jiří (2025-03-07 20:37:42+00:00): Ok,ho corretto fontanella (amenity=drinking_water) e visto che non sei sicuro al cento percento, che esiste,ho aggiunto anche fixme.
Saluti
NieWnen (2024-05-06 18:10:19+00:00): Hej, wiesz może, czy jest już tutaj obok wiata rowerowa ew. możesz ją zmapować? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3975900
p0xx (2024-05-06 20:21:10+00:00): Jest tylko ustawiony na chodniku stojak rowerowy wystawiony przez okoliczny sklep.
p0xx (2024-05-06 20:22:46+00:00): Jeszcze zweryfikuję ten punkt przy dworcu przy okazji.
nevw (2024-05-05 12:45:15+00:00): Hi, when mapping a building please map the outline of the building and not the land plot
DaVeOz (2024-05-05 13:00:54+00:00): Got it, thanks!
eggie (2024-05-05 12:04:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
spiregrain (2026-04-13 10:07:40+00:00): How should these opening hours be interpreted - "09:00-(sunset-00:30)"?
okwithmydecay (2026-04-13 10:24:11+00:00): That should be interpreted as the park closing 30 minutes before sunset, which parses in https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/
spiregrain (2026-04-13 10:50:04+00:00): Interesting, and thanks!   I generally use https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ (YoHours) which makes nothing of it.
silversurfer83 (2024-05-05 19:12:52+00:00): Hi :)

sehr schönes Micromapping des Parkplatzes. Sieht gut aus :)

Du bestehst also weiterhin darauf hier einen Eigennamen zu vergeben?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150916883