piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-12-30 21:34:22+00:00): Hi fattyhomer, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 85% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 94 building(s)
- 9 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176648599
jwu94 (2025-12-30 21:42:33+00:00): Intentional
NeisReview (2025-12-31 07:09:41+00:00): Thank you. Looks good. 👍
NeisBot (2025-12-31 07:26:06+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13419037341 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Apartment complex in Monrovia CA near downtown LA"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisRevert (2026-01-07 17:42:33+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176954377
(Deleted leftovers after several edits)
Rogoyski (2025-12-31 19:10:40+00:00): Na przyszłość zachęcam, by zamiast kasować nieczynne sklepy i inne POI-e, zostawiać je na mapie, dodając do głównego klucza prefiks 'disused:', np. 'disused:shop=supermarket'.
NieWnen (2025-12-30 23:23:59+00:00): Czy oby na pewno firma obejmuje cały budynek? Bo jeśli nie to ta zmiana jest nieprawidłowa i powinno to być co najwyżej na punkcie.

Proszę, opisuj lepiej swoje zestawy zmian.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
NieWnen (2025-12-30 23:25:21+00:00): Ok, widzę, że to nie ty dodałeś tą firmę, ale zostały inne tagi, które rownież należy uwzględnić.
NieWnen (2025-12-30 21:59:19+00:00): *Korekty landuse, budynków, geometrii obiektów i innych z weryfikacją po nowym orto
balint36 (2025-12-30 23:59:53+00:00): A tervezett villamos Rákosrendezőnél nem a Teleki Blanka utcai átjárót fogja követni, hanem az M3 lehajtó és a Szegedi út között önálló hidat kapna majd.
Balázs Szulovszky (2026-01-03 22:28:46+00:00): Szia! Igen, tisztában vagyok vele, hogy hídon fog menni a villamos, ha egyszer majd elkészül, de az nagy valószínűséggel a jelenlegi átjáró felett fog elmenni, legfeljebb a híd szélessége miatt lehet majd a most bejelölt vonalhoz képest máshol a tényleges sínpár. De ez majd a jövő zenéje. Egyelőre ez a legtöbb, amit a térképre fel lehet vinni.
NeisBot (2025-12-31 07:28:30+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1462955016 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Alexan Marmont apartments in Monrovia CA"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisRevert (2026-01-07 17:44:37+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176954463
(Deleted leftovers after several edits)
grzegorz75jan (2025-12-31 08:35:35+00:00): "Wodociąg Zbiorowy w Laskowej G."

To jest oficjalna nazwa ? i co to jest w Laskowej G.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176649575
grzegorz75jan (2025-12-31 08:46:07+00:00): Jeden z budynków tzn. ten nie widoczny na zdjęciach lotniczych to nie budynek a zbiornik podziemny. Coś w ten dekiel https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:man_made=reservoir_covered
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176649575
NeisBot (2025-12-31 07:28:31+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13419141069 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Apartment complex in Menifee Town Center"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisReview (2026-01-07 17:44:38+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/176872810
silversurfer83 (2025-12-31 11:20:57+00:00): Hi :)

die Änderung des peak List in eine Kunstwerk tourism=artwork war Absicht? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3553751871

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176649833
NeisBot (2025-12-31 07:28:33+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1462958086 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Apartments in Menifee Town Center"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisRevert (2026-01-07 17:44:38+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176954466
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-31 17:06:07+00:00): Объясните, пожалуйста, почему вы и несколько похожих аккаунтов (https://osm.org/way/1414004457/history) занимаетесь удалением и перерисовкой дорог.
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-31 17:24:57+00:00): Список аккаунтов:
https://osm.org/user/p53444565
https://osm.org/user/p7662591
https://osm.org/user/p89812010
https://osm.org/user/%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BB%20%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%8B%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%BD
https://osm.org/user/19780901
https://osm.org/user/p99203356
Joseph R P (2026-01-05 23:25:25+00:00): Hello, such short isolated segments of road such as the sections of Route 100 that you've retagged as motorways should not be tagged as motorways. Albeit arbitrary, the OSM US community usually agrees that every segment of motorway typically should have at least more than one grade-separated interchange and be multiple miles long. See here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance#Motorway
NeisBot (2025-12-31 07:28:34+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13419238248 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Solana Winchester Hills apartments Temecula"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisReview (2026-01-07 17:44:39+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/176872821
eggie (2025-12-31 06:47:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-31 07:29:47+00:00): Hoi,

De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.
MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2025-12-31 07:28:35+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1462966504 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Apartment community in Temecula"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisReview (2026-01-07 17:44:40+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/176872878
user_5359 (2025-12-31 08:42:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course
NeisBot (2025-12-31 07:28:37+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1462969441 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Avana Cypress Creek apartments in North Lauderdale Florida"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisReview (2026-01-07 17:44:41+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/176872666
K4rleak (2026-02-10 15:26:27+00:00): Dobrý den, jste si jistý že je tento edit na správném místě? Poloha je uprostřed pole. Kousek dál u cesty je Kaplička Sv. Petra a Pavla. Nedošlo k chybě?
AgusQui (2026-01-10 23:27:37+00:00): Si es actual y el usuario que lo corrigio esta en la zona no veo el problema, ademas se va a corregir cuando terminen las obras, por lo tanto ponerse a "corregir" por un itinerario que no es tal, no tiene sentido.
Por otro lado los ramales del 185 se distinguen por el color de la cartelera en ambos sentidos.
BCNorwich (2025-12-31 07:32:22+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

A couple of questions, is the AED attached to the police station wall and is it accessible 24/7? I can help with any amendment if you wish.

Regards Bernard,
Hb- (2026-01-10 10:00:28+00:00): Warum wird bei Grenzgräben die Grenze vom Wasserlauf getrennt?
welzheimerwald (2026-01-22 10:12:45+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176605680#c1543721
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-31 02:52:09+00:00): DWG revert - sock-puppet

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176655193
JobeKremmer (2026-01-02 02:44:32+00:00): Nice!
Adam Lanza 2020 (2026-01-02 03:40:13+00:00): Thanks!
Moepmoep (2026-01-10 00:37:56+00:00): Verschiedene Abschnitte des Weges tragen seit dieser Änderung unterschiedliche Namen.
george1201 (2026-01-10 01:41:30+00:00): Der Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193667703 hat genau einen Namen: Neue Stücklen-Weg.
𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ (2026-01-03 11:09:33+00:00): Dane w ewidencji nie zawsze są aktualne (!), więc czasami sprawdź w terenie/na ortofotomapie czy istnieją.
Syhmac (2026-01-03 12:45:22+00:00): Istnienie budynków zweryfikowałem ortofotomapami, chodziło tylko o to, że wcześniej kształt bazowałem na kształcie dachu, a tutaj poprawiłem na kształt murów z Ewidencji Budynków.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-31 02:52:10+00:00): DWG revert - sock-puppet

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176655193
Johnson 2009 (2025-12-30 23:59:38+00:00): Nice
Owen Russell The Bubble's Hotel Fan (2026-01-02 07:59:53+00:00): Nice
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-31 02:52:24+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19239
Tristan West (2026-03-15 19:56:04+00:00): Cool
n76 (2026-01-01 06:18:52+00:00): What is the criteria you are using to "deepen" road classifications? I am not in agreement with you on some of these changes so I’d like to understand this.
Yushclay (2026-01-01 21:44:00+00:00): Yeah, I'm mostly moving some residential roads with painted street centerlines into either: tertiary, alley, or minor/unclassified. And if it's more multilane and/or more tertiary roads connect to the road, it may be secondary. But feel free to undo some of the ones you greatly disagree, you seem to be doing this for much longer. My edits could just be taken as a suggestion, just looking to move some roads away from residential roads if traffic circulation seems to encourage some traffic patterns. If you're local, to the area, I've also been making "deepen road classification" edits in southern OC, so feedback encouraged.
Yushclay (2026-01-01 21:51:22+00:00): Edit: *residential roads with painted street centerlines into tertiary;
Other residential roads that have no residences/home addresses are changed to minor/unclassified, and residential roads to alleys if it is access between buildings/properties but not likely to have addresses attributed to the road.
n76 (2026-01-02 00:05:31+00:00): Those sound like reasonable criteria. It has been a while since I walked the area that caught my eye in your changeset. It does look like they have added center lines to some of those streets since I last looked.
TheSwavu (2025-12-31 02:56:00+00:00): Are you sure this is the correct location? According to their website they are based here: https://osm.org/go/uFyWtL2vk
Anonymous Cheese (2025-12-31 11:47:54+00:00): Swavu, have a look at this. 
https://maps.app.goo.gl/eQBj7DPa4HSiWnGS6
I was just in the area, found that this place wasn't in OSM, and decided to add it here. Nothing else.
NeisBot (2025-12-31 07:14:07+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 17 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1460165050 v2 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1460165054 v3 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1460165047 v2 | 5 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176653828
NeisReview (2026-01-17 16:35:44+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177236360
LordGarySugar (2025-12-31 04:52:02+00:00): This is not the correct way to use landuse=farmland... maybe something along the lines of boundary=place + place=farm would work better? (as a relation)
Grove11 (2025-12-31 18:44:57+00:00): That's a better idea, I've changed it now
i2004 (2025-12-31 01:40:19+00:00): queres que te ayude
Bondi Maps (2025-12-31 02:44:23+00:00): Aprecio la ayuda, pero no hace falta. Estoy subiendo mi base de datos a OSM, comparando datos y corrigiendo. Esta línea ya la tenía mapeada hace tiempo, solo que ya se hizo tarde y me tengo que ir a acostar.
A Hall (2026-01-21 04:14:30+00:00): Do you mind sharing your justification for this changeset? OpenStreetMap is not for historical information, and since the majority of infrastructure for the former King Ridge Ski Area has been removed, it isn't appropriate to be added to the map.
sfromo19 (2026-01-21 13:24:08+00:00): Hi there,

Despite the actual lifts being removed, most of these liftlines are still hikeable, and are accessible through the Town of Sutton's King Hill Reservation. There are concrete footings, snowmaking equipment and other remnants that remain along the sides of these lifts, and therefore make it worthwhile to mark.
Adam Franco (2026-01-21 16:15:12+00:00): If the cables and towers are no longer there, then don't map them as lifts -- they are no longer lifts. Instead, map the lift-lines as grass or scrub as fits the ground cover and map the surround forested areas as natural=wood. You can even map the concrete footings as man_made=foundation if you really want that level of detail.
A Hall (2026-01-22 14:55:40+00:00): I've located this map: https://www.suttonnh.gov/media/556

Which has much more limited access than suggested by the trail edits added on this changeset. The OSM data needs to be updated to better reflect the reality on the ground.
KennyDap (2025-12-31 04:47:35+00:00): This is a mistake. You can't designate an entire neighborhood with a building.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176657271
AurélienQ (2026-03-04 21:14:55+00:00): No
RatFinkster (2026-01-07 03:02:37+00:00): I put this up a week or so ago and it's not showing. Kind of disappointing, and a tragedy for my continuing if you simply toss out real work. This is the local Washington County Landfille Transfer Station. It is open, it was closed for a few months a couple years ago while they rebuild the walls people backup to the dumpsters so that you couldn't drive off it. But that was many, many years ago. It is open. I use it. Call the number for the Kaetzel Rd Center listed here if you don't believe me. https://www.washco-md.net/solid-waste-recycling/residential-permits-cash-sales/
iandees (2026-01-07 03:29:11+00:00): Hi there. Thanks for adding to the map. The data you contributed is available for anyone to use, but the default map view on osm.org might not render items tagged with amenity=waste_transfer_station. You can see it if you visit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1462986247. Keep up the great work!
NeisBot (2025-12-31 07:14:10+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 28 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/209472314 v6 | 10 crossings
https://osm.org/way/210939256 v2 | 10 crossings
https://osm.org/way/935858598 v2 | 8 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/567738764 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176654612
NeisReview (2026-01-07 17:41:51+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/176714411
https://osm.org/changeset/176714867
NeisBot (2025-12-31 07:14:10+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/562284689 v3 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/563095966 v2 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5420710088 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176654744
NeisReview (2026-01-07 17:41:51+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/176663466
NeisBot (2025-12-31 07:14:10+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 14 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/562284689 v3 | 10 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1249807363 v1 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5420710069 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176654762
felipeeugenio (2025-12-31 12:03:18+00:00): Hola. Realineaste todo con bing. Al parecer estaba con Esri. por favor intercambiar fotos satelitales para no hacer todo el trabajo dos veces. Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176655047
Comino (2025-12-31 06:22:04+00:00): Hi,

The POI is on the side of the road/garden, instead of the barbershop. Can you please fix?

Thanks, Edwin
RiverBearings (2026-01-09 23:04:46+00:00): Hello Novelgomez.I noticed a recent reclassification of this former trunk road to motorway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172877746 ; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/671587766). Based on recent daily imagery available to our editing team, construction upgrades along this route do not yet appear to be complete. There is no paving near 18.0800798, -71.6523698 and roads classified as motorways require restricted access along the entire route per the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=motorway). as there are many at grade intersections with minor unregulated roads such as this unclassified road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48460295).

Additionally, changing the classification to motorway implicitly applies oneway routing, which currently eliminates southbound routing. In order to better reflect ground truth and maintain consistency with OSM standards, would you consider restoring this to highway=trunk with highway:proposed=motorway to indicate the future classification, until construction is fully completed?

Look forward to your reply and have a good day.
RiverBearings

Traducción automática...

Hola, Novelgomez. Me di cuenta de una reciente reclasificación de esta antigua carretera troncal a la autopista (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172877746 ; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/671587766). Según las imágenes diarias recientes disponibles para nuestro equipo de edición, las mejoras de construcción a lo largo de esta ruta aún no parecen estar completas. No hay pavimentación cerca del 18.0800798, -71.6523698 y las carreteras clasificadas como autopistas requieren acceso restringido a lo largo de toda la ruta según la wiki OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=motorway). ya que hay muchas en intersecciones de grado con carreteras menores no reguladas como esta carretera no clasificada (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48460295).

Además, cambiar la clasificación a autopista aplica implícitamente el enrutamiento unidireccional, que actualmente elimina el enrutamiento en dirección sur. Con el fin de reflejar mejor la verdad del terreno y mantener la coherencia con los estándares de OSM, ¿consideraría restaurar esto a highway=trunk con highway:proposed=autoway para indicar la clasificación futura, hasta que la construcción esté completamente completa?

Espero su respuesta y que tenga un buen día.

River Bearings
Comino (2025-12-31 06:25:29+00:00): Hi,

Also here POI in the wrong place.
Please fix.

Thanks, Edwin
Warin61 (2026-01-01 02:41:37+00:00): Hi,
Two problems .. 
the way 1463029879 (residential garden) crosses itself. 
the way 1463029832 (residential garden) touches itself. 
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.99450&lat=-32.06603&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
ryivhnn (2026-01-01 03:05:57+00:00): Ergh dratted thin bits! Thanks for letting me know, I'll try to fix that up (if someone doesn't beat me to it) when I have another moment.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176656662