piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
RicGer (2023-03-11 16:17:33+00:00): Hallo Skyper,
vielen Dank für die vielen Hinweise und Sorry für meine Fehler. Die "Furten" habe ich bereits korrigiert. Danke auch für den Tipp, zukünftig JOSM zu verwenden. Ich werde mich da wohl noch ein wenig hineinfuchsen müssen, da der Editor im Vergleich zum ID recht komplex ist. Bei den Lücken in den Relationen wäre für mich noch ein Tipp hilfreich, wie ich die entstandenen Lücken leicht ausfindig machen kann. 
Schöne Grüße
RicGer
skyper (2023-03-11 17:19:03+00:00): Hey RicGer,
danke für die schnelle Antwort.
Ja, JOSM bietet wesentlich mehr Möglichkeiten und bedarf ein wenig Übung. Die meisten Personen verwenden auch noch zusätzlich Erweiterungen (utilsplugin2 ist wärmstens zu empfehlen) sowie zusätzliche Vorlagen, Kartendarstellungen und Regeln.
Die Lücken habe ich mit PTNA (https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BW/DE-BW-RVF-Analysis.html) entdeckt, allerdings ist das Korrigieren für Ungeübte nicht ganz einfach (bedarf zum Teil einen Teil-Revert). Ich werde mich darum die nächsten Tage kümmern, wenn ich Zeit finde.
Im Unterschied zu iD kenne ich mich mit JOSM sehr gut aus und beantworte auch gerne Fragen (PM).

Viel Spaß beim Mappen und Grüße,
skyper
skyper (2023-03-13 14:11:18+00:00): So, habe die Relationen korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133622918.
catdreamer (2023-03-18 09:25:48+00:00): 可拖拉微調路線，但請勿繪製一條新線段直接蓋在前人的編輯之上
A67-A67 (2023-03-10 10:06:00+00:00): Hi, why do you think this is exit 9? Neither the A4 nor the A15 have an exit 9 near this location.
ALRam (2023-03-10 10:14:44+00:00): Hello, I saw this on Bing Streetside on a sign, taken on April 2, 2021, and you can see that this exit is the 9th one. If this is not correct, then please correct it.
A67-A67 (2023-03-10 10:17:54+00:00): The 8 and 9 above the signs are not exit numbers, but detour routes. Exit numbers in the Netherlands have an exit symbol or the text "afrit" in front of it.

I'll revert this change.
ALRam (2023-03-10 10:19:14+00:00): Thanks a lot
MarkusHD (2023-03-10 09:59:10+00:00): Also auf der Homepage steht 18:30, nicht 18:00 ;)

Und das "opening_hours evaluation tool" erlaubt offenbar auch dreistellige Abkürzungen für Wochentage, aber offiziell laut Wiki ist es nur "We".
mmha (2023-03-10 10:05:41+00:00): Bin ich blind oder stand da in den Opening hours nicht auch schon 18:30? Wed habe ich korrigiert, blöder Reflex vom englische Mails schreiben...
MarkusHD (2023-03-10 11:21:02+00:00): Jetzt hab ich in meinem Kommentar auch noch die beiden Uhrzeiten vertauscht. Vor lauter Zahlen...
Aber hast ja gewusst, wie ich es meine.
literan (2023-03-10 16:39:24+00:00): ознакомьтесь с тем, как надо указывать названия, пожалуйста: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F

ваше имя я отправил в тег official_name
Frans S (2023-03-10 11:49:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133511616
wille (2023-03-10 11:24:21+00:00): Olá, Obrigado pela contribuição. A tag correta para adicionar CEPs em ruas é postal_code
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133511797
user_18541240 (2023-03-10 12:13:57+00:00): Não sabia! Vou ajustar novamente ! Só quero contribuir !
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133511797
Frans S (2023-03-10 11:46:44+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133511802
ALu68 (2023-03-11 07:59:01+00:00): Hello Gayle A,

welcome to OSM.

Please do not use "Building" as a name - this makes no sense.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name

Please read the wiki first.

Thanks & Happy mapping
flohoff (2023-03-10 11:50:26+00:00): Moin,
ist das nicht ein wenig doppelt gemoppelt den namen der Firma in name UND operator unterzubringen?

Flo
Hiddenhausener (2023-03-10 12:07:36+00:00): Copy und Paste. Da beides untereinander stand hab ich es mit reinkopiert. Seh es nicht als falsch an.
flohoff (2023-03-10 12:12:52+00:00): "Falsch" im klasisschen Sinne nicht. Ist eher so ein "Captain Obvious" das die Firma von der Firma betrieben wird. 

Das mit dem operator ist ja für dinge bei denen das eigentlich nicht offensichtlich ist. Also Parkplätze z.b. die zu Firmen gehören.

War auch kein "Ey alter das ist falsch" sondern ein - "Das ist nen bisschen redundant oder?" 

Alles okay ...


Flo
Hiddenhausener (2023-03-10 13:21:27+00:00): Habs nicht als Angriff aufgefasst. Ich weiß ja du Ahnung hast. Sowas merk ich mir dann fürs nächste Mal.
Gregory Peony (2025-08-12 23:09:34+00:00): When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint.  Keep in mind that you are looking at the roofs of buildings, but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133512022
eggie (2023-03-10 10:26:28+00:00): TOP !

Hier nog wat aanwijzingen voor VR mappers..

Veiligheidsdiensten  : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Hulpdiensten 

Mapse
eggie
carthick1000 (2023-03-10 11:25:00+00:00): Hi eggie, 
Thanks for your feedback. But this is not a way used by regular buses. This is used by parkshuttle which in an autonomous shuttle. Due to the way being 'busway' it seems some navigation systems are picking up this route to be used by cars. This is whole route is a no entry for everything except autonomous shuttles. OSM does not seem to have an path object for restricted access to autonomous/experimental shuttles. 

This causes cars / other road users driving on the path of these shuttles, which might put everyone under risk of collision. 

Would recommend this to be changed to a restricted road than a busway.

Thanks.
eggie (2023-03-10 11:49:09+00:00): Oke....I understand your concern... ... but construction is not correct anyway.
In fact... The tagging is right. 
The highway=busway implies 
    access=no
    bus=designated
    emergency=yes
The problem is the routingapp infact.

No regular traffic will route over this busway. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbusway

So better inform the develloper of the routingapp.

You may ask some advice at the OSM forum.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43

English is no problem.

Greetz,
eggie
xyzbeppo (2023-07-18 15:10:21+00:00): Not suitable for fastbike routing profile.
Famlam (2023-03-26 18:53:56+00:00): Beste Reisinformatiegroep,
Betreffende node 777302947 (en nog een aantal andere) is het goed om te weten dat er geen barrier=kerb toegevoegd moet worden, wanneer de node op de kruising zelf staat. Voor een kruising is kerb=* afdoende.
De stoeprand ligt immers niet op de straat waar auto's rijden. Als u barrier=kerb los wilt tekenen, dan dient u een node te plaatsen op de exacte locatie van de stoeprand (dus niet op de kruising met de hoofdweg)

Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dkerb#On_a_node

Samengevat:
Ofwel: nodes op de exacte positie van de stoeprand (niet de kruising met de weg) en barrier=kerb + kerb=*
Ofwel: nodes op de kruising met kerb=* maar zonder barrier=*
Famlam (2023-03-26 19:00:32+00:00): (Merk op dat dit een bekende bug is in iD editor)
Frans S (2023-03-10 10:47:42+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Square each rectangular building with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this document 
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link

This is a standard message. Detailed info about your mapping follows in next message.
Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133512897
Frans S (2023-03-10 10:52:09+00:00): Hello again.
This is a rather difficult part of the task.
Tall buildings need a specific approach to map.
But, your mappings are not that accurate as well.
You collected several buildings and mapped them as 1 building.
Not accurate mapped and squared. 
you also included not build areas in a building
As I said, a difficult part. 
Please find a what easier task to start with.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133512897
Frans S (2023-03-10 10:52:32+00:00): About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Please adjust wrong positioned buildings as well
This video shows how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133512897
Hufkratzer (2023-03-14 00:39:01+00:00): So why did you change the building to a horse riding center? Isn't is a building anymore? Every building should have a building tag, otherwise it isn't rendered as a building! And tag leisure=horse_riding isn't for specific buildings, it is for the whole farm, compare
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/842259858
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding
yorados (2023-03-10 16:21:22+00:00): Hi,

ich würde bei der Bankfiliale sagen
name=	VR-Bank Würzburg, Filiale Zell

sonst alles ok. Viel Spaß beim mappen
Frans S (2023-03-10 11:25:40+00:00): Hello again.
See my previous comment about mapping of tracks.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133513544
Frans S (2023-03-10 11:22:05+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
In fact, your mapping is good, however, when you read the instructions about mapping tracks, you see that this track was not neccessary.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133513719
Frans S (2023-03-12 16:33:45+00:00): About highway tagging:

Please Please apply the rules described in this wiki
Most common taggings.
Rural areas : Unclassified,  track , path, service
Urban areas: unclassified, residential, path.


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2023-03-10 11:17:05+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
Please map more accurate. Yards are no part of a building.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133514017
fcus19 (2023-03-10 17:50:39+00:00): Sorry I double-checked and there is actually only one charging station so this one does not need to be added
messpert (2023-04-01 11:31:02+00:00): I have just received a email from SW Water which says:
"since last year have brought
Hawks Tor, an old disused quarry, into use as a new reservoir."

So surely your tag of residential can never have been right?

Presumably it needs updating at the very least. I wuld have said construction, but the email suggests that it is already a reservoir.

Maybe, just maybe, I might be able to survey later this year.
messpert (2023-04-01 11:37:34+00:00): Just checked the history, and see that it was marked as residential many years ago. Looking at old imagery, there seem to be a few houses around the edge, but it most of it looks like industrial/commercial typical of an old quarry...
Frans S (2023-03-10 11:38:40+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project
Highway tagging.

Please use the rules how to tag highways on this project according to this wiki.
This trace is too wide to be tagged as a path.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133514414
Frans S (2023-03-10 11:35:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Square each rectangular building with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133514440
Frans S (2023-03-10 11:35:43+00:00): Hello. 
About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Please adjust wrong positioned buildings as well
This video shows how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133514440
pierre0032 (2023-05-27 18:17:47+00:00): Cette fontaine ne fonctionne plus
Frans S (2023-03-13 11:07:12+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Each rectangular building ought to be squared with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133514832
Frans S (2023-03-13 11:08:42+00:00): About highway tagging:

Please apply the rules described in this wiki
Most common taggings.
Rural areas : Unclassified,  track , path, service
Urban areas: unclassified, residential, path.
You tagged 'path along streets lined with houses.
The trace is too wide for a path.  Unclassified is the correct tag here.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133514832
Frans S (2023-03-10 11:44:22+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Square each rectangular building with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually. 


See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133514956
Frans S (2023-03-22 12:53:20+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
About mapping of tall apartment blocks or high buildings

Mapping of tall (multi-story) buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you will see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Please adjust wrong positioned buildings as well
This video shows how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133514962
Frans S (2023-03-22 12:53:35+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.

You are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

In iDeditor, zoom in so far that the hidden objects are visible.(blue note on bottom line warns about hidden objects)
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Tag buildings as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines and squared(rectangular only).


Don't connect nodes to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.

See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133514962
eggie (2023-03-10 11:53:58+00:00): Reverted by changeset #133515504

Your contribution is in the middle of the North Sea.

I reverted your contribution.
Greetz,
eggie
Frans S (2023-03-10 11:52:38+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. However, not squared!

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133515161
RicoElectrico (2023-03-10 11:46:23+00:00): Cześć, jeśli masz jak sprawdzić, to możesz też dodać sklepy, które powstały w lokalach :)
Jordi MF (2023-03-13 20:39:17+00:00): Hola Juan Luis,
He revisado esta edición y parece estar bien. Al fin y al cabo solo has añadido el pavimento. Para ediciones tan simples, no hace falta que pidas ninguna revisión. Seguro que lo habrás hecho bien. Su aún así, quieres que alguien lo revise, puedes marcar la opción.
Saludos,
Jordi
JuanLuisAGP (2023-03-13 21:09:49+00:00): Muchas gracias Jordi. Lo tendré en cuenta. Tengo mucho respeto y admiración a OpenStreetMap y me da miedo hacer algo mal. Gracias!
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].