piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Ray_D (2024-10-14 11:47:13+00:00): 1. 改进海峡路到鹅公岩大桥，明确了最左为定向车道。
2. 改进了工商大学、清华中学区域。
3. 增添了盘龙区域的标记。
4. 修复了一些他人的错误。
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 12:06:02+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12250310875/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
zzptichka (2024-10-15 22:23:40+00:00): What makes it impassable? Looks good on Bing imagery.
zzptichka (2024-10-15 22:25:18+00:00): OK, nevermind, the tag was removed.
Gravel_contributor (2024-10-15 22:28:21+00:00): I made a mistake but corrected it in a later version. Sorry for the confusion.
HubMiner (2024-10-14 12:02:39+00:00): Not sure why this got extended across the globe.  All changes were mean for https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18162109 plus adjacent waterways.
ivanbranco (2024-10-14 12:11:02+00:00): The reason was this little boy in Russia: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157873395
HubMiner (2024-10-14 15:31:18+00:00): Thanks! I am curious how and why it was created and if it is the user problem or JOSM misbehaving.
HubMiner (2024-10-14 15:33:05+00:00): Thanks!
eggie (2024-10-14 13:09:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Waarom een website op een woning?   Dat is niet gebruikelijk. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-10-14 13:16:37+00:00): Kijk even hier wat je mogelijkheden en onmogelijkheden zijn.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice

De website heb ik verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
Vinber-Pro (2024-10-19 09:17:39+00:00): bonjour,
ne pas oublier d'ajouter le tag principal, ici shop=beauty.

je l'ai ajouté et corrigé certaines choses, cela devrait remonter plus facilement !

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12250337776

à plus
5m4u9 (2024-10-15 02:00:43+00:00): La ruta fundamental 16 va hasta ixiamas-san buenaventura y llega a porvenir, pando... 😱

lo de terciaria esta bien.
wildmaps (2024-10-16 21:07:10+00:00): Sorry I didn't knew that at that time! Thanks for the edit
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-14 12:22:09+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być formatu XX-XXX, gdzie X oznacza cyfrę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460678705

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12250378115
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12250352484
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356107999
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/761087896

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Zagórze":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12250352446
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12250352447
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12250352448

"Sudoł":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12250378112

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
divaddivag (2024-10-14 12:25:33+00:00): Pb envoi JOSM: iti 1406 première partie - source: survey
Frans S (2024-10-25 08:59:54+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You clustered a group of buildings as a single building. 
These sheds need to be mapped individually.
Best regards
adas (2024-12-04 11:03:30+00:00): Czy ulica Krzyształowa naprawdę jest przejezdna? Cała?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-14 12:30:51+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1015485847

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-10-14 13:17:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-10-14 13:26:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
De officiële adresnode staat hier op Rein Welschenlaan 1
Daar kun je ook op bijtaggen.
Klopt BIC wel als officieel adres?
Je adres is ook niet compleet. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-10-14 13:28:03+00:00): De naam staat ook al op het gebouw. Wellicht een keuze maken.
eggie (2024-10-14 13:31:44+00:00): Het was hier al eerder goed gemapt. Ik heb je bijdrage verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
Xvtn (2024-10-14 16:06:33+00:00): Thanks for catching that!
Ray_D (2024-10-14 12:42:20+00:00): 1. 添加内部道路。 
2. 增添2个汽修店。
eggie (2024-10-14 13:21:37+00:00): Dag Freek. Voor wie geldt dit verbod?
Ook voor wandelaars? 
foot=permissive wellicht?

MVG
eggie
FreekL (2024-10-14 13:49:39+00:00): bedankt voor je bericht, ik heb het aangepast naar permissive. Het betreft een pad door een stuk bos waarbij de eigenaar het op dit moment niet erg vind dat er doorheen gewandeld wordt. Gemotoriseerde voortuigen zijn niet wenselijk.
eggie (2024-10-14 13:53:42+00:00): Oke top!
flohoff (2024-10-14 13:06:16+00:00): Moin,
ist das richtig das der Fahrradständer nicht von Kunden/Besuchern benutzt werden darf?

Flo
CCRDude (2024-10-14 13:15:43+00:00): Dieser Fahrradständer ist ein überdachter Fahrradständer (bzw. ein kleiner "Fahrradschuppen") für die Ausleihräder des TEILBAR Schloss Hamborn e.V., eines örtlichen gemeinnützigen Vereins. 

Der reguläre Fahrradständer davor/daneben (sollte am besten auch noch eingetragen werden) darf natürlich von jedem genutzt werden.
flohoff (2024-10-15 09:22:52+00:00): Hmm,
ich hab so ein bisschen zweifel das das hier dann richtig getagged ist.

Wir taggen ja auch nicht jeden Private Fahrradschuppen als Fahrradständer. 

Am ende ist es dann ja nur teil eines "Firmengebäudes" in dem halt die Fahrräder gelagert werden. So richtig Fahrradständer ist das ja nicht.

Naja - Wir lassen es mal so.

Flo
CCRDude (2024-10-15 10:24:14+00:00): Die Fahrräder können (in Zukunft) nach Anmeldung durchaus auch von Nichtmitgliedern ausgeliehen werden (Nachfrage etwa von Gästen der nahegelegenen Reha-Klinik ist da, aktuell werden die dafür noch Mitglied), daher fand ich ihren Standort wichtig genug, um ihn zu mappen.

Sobald diese Funktion technisch umgesetzt ist, würde ich das auf access=customers ändern. Dann wäre es vermutlich auch amenity=bicycle_rental ?
flohoff (2024-10-15 11:17:39+00:00): Du hast es halt als "Fahrradständer" getagged. Und das ist es ja eigentlich nicht. Das man auch von nichtmitgliedern AUSLEIHEN kann ist da ja eher irrelevant. Es ist eigentlich kein Fahrradständer sondern ein Fahrradverleih.

Genau - ich denke sowas wie bicycle_rental ist da besser.
Flo
silversurfer83 (2024-10-14 15:46:04+00:00): Moin,

die erste Runde Feedback hat leider erstmal nichts mit den Änderungen an sich zu tun, sondern um die B-Note (also alles drumherum):

Mir fehlt bei einer solchen Änderung eine Quellenangabe, eine Angabe welche Hintergründe genutzt wurden und gerne ein Link auf die Diskussion im Forum, die du ja geführt hast.
Zusätzlich wäre auch bei solchen Sachen zu begrüßen, wenn du die Änderungen geografisch stückeln könntest, da nun 3 solche großen CS ohne weitere Details bei Leuten, die in DE (und Frankreich, Tschechien, BeNeLux,...) Qualitätssicherung betreiben, durch die Feeds tickern. Ohne weitere Details in den Metadaten klickt man sich jetzt erstmal wieder zu Pascal Neis Tools durch und guckt, was du da gemacht hast.

Zu den centerlines an sich muss sich jemand anderes äußern.

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157876044
dktue (2025-06-14 15:12:31+00:00): Die Centerlines lassen sich aus den Luftbildern mappen. Ich werden künftig (geografisch) kleinere Changesets machen.
gscholz (2024-12-04 09:02:05+00:00): Hi Martin218110,
your recent changesets have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=2.39886&lat=47.20510&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. 
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Metzor (2024-10-14 13:17:09+00:00): Hi Evie,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) 

You added things in:
1) UK near Swansea
2) Southern Italy
3) Nassau (Bahamas)

How does that relate to "Congo River floods response", which you used as changeset description?

Furthermore one general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
nevw (2024-10-15 01:57:12+00:00): Hi, the suffix of addr:street names should not be abbreviated. I fixed your edits.
martinst (2026-07-04 06:09:43+00:00): access-Einträge falsch, zurückgeändert in changeset/185075856
mcliquid (2024-11-07 09:55:50+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
dktue (2025-06-14 15:10:59+00:00): Thanks for your hint. I will consider it in the future.
plamen (2024-10-15 05:58:36+00:00): Тази магистрала кога стигна до Плевен?
m_zahariev (2024-10-15 07:01:26+00:00): Все още не е стигнала, но е в строеж до ПВ Плевен. Очакването е до края на годината МРРБ да издаде разрешително за строеж и за лотовете до Велико Търново.
martinst (2026-07-04 06:09:09+00:00): access-Einträge überflüssig, zurückgeändert in changeset/185075856
mcliquid (2024-11-07 09:55:34+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
yrtimiD (2024-11-01 22:52:32+00:00): no need to put addr:city on roads. addr is for specific object only like house or amenity. 
also, usually there is no real need to add addr:city tag, since all items are already in a bigger city polygon. (same applies for addr:country)

read more: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:*
Amit Yaron (2024-11-02 07:28:11+00:00): In Organic Maps application, I still find that the street is in Kfar Saba. 
I think we need to do something about it, in particular when people dis alternatives to Google apps.
yrtimiD (2024-11-03 10:43:24+00:00): I checked this street both in OsmAnd (android app) and direct on OSM and in both cases it's in Hod Hasharon. So, I believe that a problem is in Organic maps app, please report them a bug.

see by yourself:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=%D7%96%D7%9C%D7%9E%D7%9F%20%D7%A9%D7%96%22%D7%A8#map=19/32.164190/34.910581
Dodko (2024-12-27 12:45:16+00:00): Treba pozorne vyplniť tagy do telefónu nepatrí mail adresa.
Fibo_fr (2024-10-22 15:31:59+00:00): Confirmé par le Conseil Municipal du 17/10/2024
Tolstoi21 (2024-10-16 06:33:41+00:00): Hei, ja kiitos lisäyksistäsi ja korjauksistasi tuohon Eteläisen Postipuiston alueeseen. Mietin lähinnä, pitäisikö nyt alueelle lisäämäsi highway=construction -tiet (Eckerönpuisto, Filatelistinkuja, ym.) tagata mieluummin highway=proposed -tagilla. Tuo koko eteläinen alue on nyt (ja aika pitkään tulevaisuudessakin) työmaata, eikä noiden tulevien teiden pohjarakennelmia taida olla vielä paikalla. Helsingin Sanomissa oli hiljattain juttu, jossa todettiin että tuolla paikalla tehdään (paikalla olleen kaatopaikan takia) maanvaihto, joka kestää vuoteen 2027. Eli useaan vuoteen noita teitä ei vielä edes aleta rakentamaan. Siksi ehkä mieluummin highway=proposed kuin =construction (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dproposed)
Tolstoi21 (2024-10-23 06:01:46+00:00): Muutettu highway=construction -tagatut tiet proposed:highway=residential tagiin (ja lisätty note + fixme tagit). Paikalla ei vielä tulevien teiden rakenteita, ja viitesopimus entisen kaatopaikan maanvaihdosta löytyy kaupungin päätösarkistosta diaarinumerolla HEL 2023-008751
BCNorwich (2024-10-15 06:50:52+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately your paths were duplications of existing highways with problems as per the warnigs given above. Thus I've removed them.

Regards Bernard
aTarom (2024-10-14 15:45:28+00:00): hola Valencia Blue, bienvenido a OSM, qué quieres añadir o modificar? antes de crear ediciones de prueba en conveniente preguntar a la comunidad, tienes
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51
ó
el telegram de la comunitat valenciana
https://t.me/OSMvalencia

Por favor pregunta lo que necesites y estaremos encantados de ayudarte en los primeros pasos

Saludos cordiales
nevw (2024-10-14 20:21:34+00:00): Hi Rymck, welcome to osm. 
This is a footway but it is not a sidewalk.
A side walk is close and  parallel to a road.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
Rymck (2024-10-15 00:30:20+00:00): Thank you, I have removed the sidewalk tag.
mga_geo (2024-10-28 13:39:30+00:00): Bonjour,
La modification du rond-point a cassé la relation route=bus r4259846.
Il me semble que d'après la vue aérienne 2023 la découpe faite ne corresponde pas au terrain.
Marc
mga_geo (2024-11-09 06:40:06+00:00): Bonjour,
Pas de réponse ?
La relation est toujours cassée.
Marc
NeisBot (2024-10-14 13:54:17+00:00): Ooops, it seems that some of your names are a bit unusual ...

Amount>=1
#NeisLab #Minutely #Naming
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-14 15:24:39+00:00): Thank you for your contribution, EsaJud.

Do all these mapped toilets really have a name as you have entered in the name tag?
EsaJud (2024-10-14 19:10:48+00:00): Yes, they have names. We are currently working on a project called IDEAMAPS which involves working with the community in mapping their assets. Thus, they knew the names of most of the assests.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-14 14:01:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, usuń addr:place i zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, pozostaw tylko addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625840677
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625840678
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625840679
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625840684
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625840685
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625840686
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625840690
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625840691
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625840732
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625841288
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625841295
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/626276880
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1323868774
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1323868775

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_18760664 (2024-10-18 16:17:33+00:00): for house number use
addr:housenumber

you can set street with
addr:street

I can update the houses with addr:housenumber and addr:street + remove the name field if you need
TrickyFoxy (2024-10-15 22:27:17+00:00): Магнит уже отмечен. Что вы хотели обозначить как "Магнит гл."?
gmar5 (2024-10-14 17:37:49+00:00): Hi. 

Is it actually necessary to map these? They seem to me quite internal to the organigram of the institutions, and we don't map various other college offices (academic, bursaries, development, etc.), which are of little interest to general users.

Moreover, they certainly are not "bars" (even if drinking were to happen in them!).
Andrew Chadwick (2024-10-15 15:39:21+00:00): Agreed. And what's a BUNET?

I bet they're not even public access bars😞  We probably ought to revert this one.
Andrew Chadwick (2024-10-15 15:40:52+00:00): (or tag them as office=it https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dit, maybe)
gmar5 (2024-10-15 15:54:47+00:00): BUNET, I suppose, is a consortium of those 5 colleges (acronym of their initials), who probably share IT resources and staff. 
office=it might be an appropriate descriptor, but they seem too private for me, and part a larger entity more than their own IT company.
At the moment, besides the overall college institution being mapped, we have libraries and chapels, which are mostly private but might be open to visitors in some cases, and they occupy very distinctive buildings. All other private amenities (college bars, dining facilities) and internal offices are not mapped as such.

If jhdore mapped these for a reason, we can hear it, otherwise I would agree with reverting.
Andrew Chadwick (2024-10-16 08:46:13+00:00): Reached out. If I get a response privately, I'll paste it here. Otherwise, let's revert this change later today.
Andrew Chadwick (2024-10-16 11:23:07+00:00): An update:

> Hi Andrew, Sorry, been laid up with a cold for a few days. It was done out of frustration as there didn’t seem to be an available option that matched and was available in the list. Bar is at the top, so I just chose that. I mapped each office so we could get an idea of the relative locations and screen grab them for internal documentation purposes but they can be reverted if it’s an issue. 
> Cheers, James
Andrew Chadwick (2024-10-16 11:31:10+00:00): @jhdore
Fair enough. You may want to give https://umap.openstreetmap.fr a go instead if that's your use case, though!

You've edited the main database, but it's no problem if the locations are accurate. I'll convert them to private offices rather than public bars, so that people using the map don't get the wrong idea. They won't be visible on the default layers afterwards: consider making a private or shared map with uMap. That should be satisfyingly instant :-)

Thanks for your contribution, and I hope we can offer something that isn't frustrating to use.
Andrew Chadwick (2024-10-16 11:41:29+00:00): Fixed up with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157960690. Thanks, all!
literan (2024-10-14 16:40:03+00:00): это не ресторан, а кулинария. Исправлю на верные теги
Yulia1989 (2024-10-18 10:27:32+00:00): Спасибо за исправление.
ToniE (2024-10-15 13:28:34+00:00): Servus,

es gilt ein Spruch bei OSM:

'name' ist nur der Name

D.h. 'gesperrt' und andere Kommentare/Hinweise gehören nicht in 'name'. access=no ist hier gemapped, das reicht um "gesperrt" zu hinterlegen.

NB: Falls, und nur falls du im  Auftrag einer Gemeinde, Organisation, Tourismusverband, ... arbeitest und kein:e Hobby-Mapper:in bist: schaue bitte in die Organized Edit Guidelines

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Organised_Editing_Guidelines

Viele Grüße
Toni
martinst (2026-07-03 19:57:20+00:00): Hallo RD ÖBF,
bitte äußere dich hier zu dem Sachverhalt.
OpenStreeMap ist ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt, das nur funktioniert wenn  man miteinander kommuniziert.
Gruß Martin
MO'Djune (2026-07-03 12:07:18+00:00): Clogga caravan park does not cater to motor homes.
Dafo43 (2026-07-06 11:35:34+00:00): Feel free to make amendments.
tomhukins (2024-10-23 13:31:05+00:00): Thank you for your work on the map: it's always good to see people contributing.

You have added a "name" and "house name" of "Passo restaurant" to a five storey building, which is not tagged as a restaurant: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/630379337

However, there is a restaurant named "Lilenblum" which also has the house name "Passo Restaurant": https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12250584314

Don't worry about making mistakes - it's easily done - but I'm happy to help fix things if you let me know what you were aiming for.
gscholz (2024-12-04 09:01:38+00:00): Hi Martin218110,
your recent changesets have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=2.39886&lat=47.20510&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. 
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
SekeRob (2024-10-17 14:33:43+00:00): Hi,

waiting on part 7 with baited breath. Now many of these Elba islets are highlighted as needing an inner role. Since there are two lines each, both with outer, think last time the 'outer' correction landed on the wrong outline. So my interpretation, that all in the Elba relation need to be outer and those with the Santuaire Pelagos need to be inner. Took me a long time to load all members into JOSM than dragged a islet node to kick the validator and sure the MP is not working, warning there is a style on member outlines members.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=10.35879&lat=42.74781&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Personally I'd tag this as a boundary as it is now and removing all the 'inner' as everything inside the SP sea zone is automatically part of the reserve. Maybe another reader of this has comment to this.

ciao
wildmaps (2024-10-18 23:34:20+00:00): Hi,

thanks for your comment. I mada a mistake with these islets. I didn't hat time to fix this but I hope that I can do it next week. I'm improoving the coastline and islets around the whole island but I have still a lot of work.
I asked the local osm community how I should map it and when I have time I wil fix it.
Thanks
Kookykooky (2024-10-15 10:52:35+00:00): Hi, I noticed that you modified the forest paths, the paths here now look very untidy. Do these roads really go like this here? E.g. the long way across the river - no ford, bridge.... the next way crosses the railway... it doesn't look like that in reality. It would be nice to fix it according to reality. Thanks
Adéla
toshniba (2024-10-15 11:27:41+00:00): Yes, this was a mistake from me. But I restored the previous state already.
Kookykooky (2024-10-16 08:21:01+00:00): Hi, I still see the bad state.
toshniba (2024-10-16 08:56:46+00:00): Seems like a caching problem. Please open in another browser (with which you did not visit osm before) or empty your browser cache data to see if it persists. Even in JOSM Editor I cannot see any mistakes when I download a fresh copy of the area.