piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tobych (2023-01-19 07:00:16+00:00): Hi, thanks. Just checking: the land is private, but the informal path is clearly well-established, from the look of it, and there are no "private property" or "no trespassing" signs on either end. So it's "informal", right? From what I understand from more reading about OSM, the emphasis should be on what I see, and what people obviously do, rather than concerns about land ownership. So in way, me having a layer of parcel data from the city's ArcGIS server is getting in the way. Whereas, on the other hand, the city's data telling me another trail is public and managed by the city itself means it's reasonable to put access=yes. Right?
Glassman (2023-01-19 23:12:34+00:00): I use the parcel data regularly and rely on it so I understand why you use it as well. I would say that marking the trail as informal is all that is needed. access=yes is implied so isn't really needed. 

BTW - the informal tag got added because of government parks. Informal helps them when looking for lost hikers and where they might want to add plantings to the area to discourage it use.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-01-16 13:31:30+00:00): Hi, please always check with Estonian land board's gis.
https://xgis.maaamet.ee/xgis2/page/app/maainfo

This building has two addresses.

https://xgis.maaamet.ee/adsavalik/ads?ads_oid=EE00643248

Having addr2:*** like it had previously is not the best solution, but we can place another address as a node in such cases.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10559413985

What your couriers/drivers say may be limited to the task they had at hand, it's important to verify this information.
Bolt026 (2023-01-16 14:21:56+00:00): Hi,
Thank you so much for sharing these links and for fixing the map. I will consider this approach in my future similar edits and I will be more cautious in checking all the available sources. 
The customer who lives in that building provided us with the information about the entrance at Kauba 26 and for Paide 16 address he said that it corresponds to the wood shed and the yard behind it.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-01-16 15:57:46+00:00): Really strange. The land board thinks it's Kauba 26
https://xgis.maaamet.ee/adsavalik/ads?ads_oid=ME02784472
Note that there is another shed on this cadastral unit. It has a Paide 16 address.

Anyway, the sheds aren't that important, considering the special case of a building with 2 addresses.

Here we can see that the house indeed has two addresses even on the street and it's important that we've reflected this.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=59.415999809335&lng=24.744711471745&z=17&pKey=1708248699365510&focus=photo&x=0.6657133411725301&y=0.5163776182968407&zoom=0.737068965517242
ovruni (2023-01-16 08:25:58+00:00): Hola, por favor evitar el uso de abreviaciones como "Av.", en su lugar en OSM ponemos el texto completo como "Avenida". https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Abreviaturas_(no_hacer_esto)
Saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:14:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:44:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:45:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
silversurfer83 (2023-01-16 09:27:53+00:00): Moin wies1,

ich finde, diese Änderung ist nicht wirklich glücklich. Laut unserem Wiki ist es vollkommen in Ordnung ein Tor auch an einen way zu mappen.  Du hast nun den way gelöscht (der das Tor realistischer dargestellt hat) und durch einen Punkt ersetzt. Schöner wäre es gewesen, wenn du den way erhalten hättest und den Punkt ZUSÄTZLICH gesetzt hättest. Wahrscheinlich hätte der validator von JOSM dann trotzdem gemeckert, aber das sollte für uns doch nur ein Hinweis sein, dass da etwas nicht stimmen könnte, kein Befehl, es zwinged so zu ändern wie JOSM es gerne hätte.
Hier die Situation im Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dgate


Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131326786
wies1 (2023-01-16 10:09:57+00:00): Hallo,
ich hatte eine Fehlermeldung im Validator hierzu gesehen und dann nachgeschaut auf

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:barrier

Daher habe ich das Lift-Gate als Punkt angebracht, wie es dort vermerkt ist.

Gruss
wies1
silversurfer83 (2023-01-16 10:14:33+00:00): Hallo Wies,
wie schon erwähnt: Die Meldungen sind ja kein Zwang. Und die englische Seite im Wike sagt glasklar, dass der barrier tag auch an ways kann und soll, jedoch, um routern das Leben zu erleichtern, ZUSÄTZLICH ein node an die Kreuzung von barrier und highway.

Vielleicht kannst du in Zukunft die gates als weg bestehen lassen und fügst bloß noch den fehlenden Punkt hinzu.

Grüße
silversurfer83
wies1 (2023-01-16 10:26:47+00:00): Hallo,
danke für den Hinweis. Deinen Vorschlag finde ich eine gute Idee.
Gruss
wies1
silversurfer83 (2023-01-16 10:28:09+00:00): Freut mich :)
weiter frohes Schaffen
Polarbear (2023-01-19 22:28:44+00:00): Hallo Danny83,
was war die Quelle deiner fehlerhaften Änderung des Platznamens?
Warum hast du die im Objekt selbst verlinkten Quellen und die Änderungshistorie nicht beachtet?
Polarbear (2023-01-19 22:32:35+00:00): Und welche Quelle gibt es für den name:uk ?
Polarbear (2023-02-12 08:29:50+00:00): https://berliner-zeitung.imgix.net/2023/01/16/d7a2d268-1f69-4ce8-ae19-1267a1a30539.jpeg
mavl (2023-04-25 09:00:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
NorthCrab (2023-01-16 10:03:54+00:00): building:levels powinny być na budynku a nie działce. Zawsze dobrą opcją jest sprawdzenie dokumentacji, w tym przypadku https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:42:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:25:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Supaplex (2023-01-16 09:19:23+00:00): alt_name 加國道四號?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131327711
skyper (2023-01-16 13:48:11+00:00): Hello Dilan,
again I doubt that we are allow to import data from the website. Are there really two car_sharing station at almost the same location (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4338628292 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10559000539)?
Regards,
skyper
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:39:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
eggie (2023-01-16 09:13:48+00:00): Dag ZWD Zou je svp concreet willen aangeven wat je hebt gedaan.
Dit zullen medemappers op prijs stellen.
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:28:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:18:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:36:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:19:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:39:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:37:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
adrianojbr (2023-01-19 13:17:48+00:00): Olá, luanaramos!

Você mapeou um edifício usando a imagem de fundo da Mapbox, que está bastante desatualizada nessa região. 

No momento, a mais atualizada é a da Maxar, tanto que dá para ver um edifício em construção nesse local que já estava mapeado.

Abraço!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:35:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
silversurfer83 (2023-01-16 09:31:01+00:00): Hi
warum ist denn hier das landuse=residential verschwunden?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131328653
wies1 (2023-01-16 10:22:42+00:00): Hallo, da muss mir ein Fehler unterlaufen sein. Ich wollte kein landuse residential beseitigen. 
Am sinnvollsten dürfte sein, ich nehme den Changeset mit dem Reverter zurück - nur weiss ich nicht, wie das geht. Oder hat du eine Idee, wie ich den Fehler anderweitig korrigieren kann?
Gruss
wies1
silversurfer83 (2023-01-16 10:26:55+00:00): Du kannst bei JOSM das reverter plugin installieren und dann damit dieses CS laden (wohl einfach den Link einfügen).  Details sollte diese Seite im Wiki liefern
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter
wies1 (2023-01-16 10:40:06+00:00): Habs wieder hergestellt und so den Fehler korrigiert
eggie (2023-01-16 10:44:28+00:00): ErEr Kijk even hier... Dan zie je dan je een hoek van een schuurtje hebt verwijderd. Dat is nu een driehoek.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131328778

MVG
eggie
ErEr99 (2023-01-16 10:50:14+00:00): Ah sorry, ja het is even oefenen.... maar het gaat wel al steeds beter :)
eggie (2023-01-16 11:20:24+00:00): In het begin is alles rijstebrij..maar dat gaat over :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:15:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:42:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
NorthCrab (2023-01-16 10:06:54+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Proszę nie mapuj poszczególnych pasów jezdni. W tym przypadku nie ma fizycznej separacji, a samo skrzyżowanie nie jest super skomplikowane. Gdyby jednak rozdzielenie tutaj było zasadne, to dokonując tego typu zmiany należy także poprawić inne odcinki drogi - np zaktualizować ilość pasów albo pasy do skrętu - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/671806616. Wypadałoby też wtedy poprawić relacje autobusowe.

Zważywszy na powyższe zmianę tą wycofałem.

Pozdrawiam!
bingis (2023-01-16 10:21:52+00:00): Celem edycji była poprawa błędu w nawigacji, który kieruje zamiast os razu w lewo, to najpierw w prawo pod światła, a następnie każe zawracać.
W linku screen z tej sytuacji.
https://ibb.co/Dt4JTQH
bingis (2023-01-16 10:22:58+00:00): Ahh, wręcz każe jechać przez drogę dworzec, gdzie wjazd jest tylko dla autobusów.
NorthCrab (2023-01-16 10:26:27+00:00): Rzeczywiście poważny problem. Zlokalizowałem na tym skrzyżowaniu zakaz skrętu w lewo co powodował to zamieszanie. Poprawiłem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131331838. Aby sprawdzać ograniczenia skrętu w edytorze iD wystarczy że klikniesz punkt łączący kilka dróg (ta szara kropeczka). Po lewo ukaże ci się edytor. Pozdrawiam!
bingis (2023-01-16 10:35:06+00:00): No i super!
Dzięki za podpowiedzi, przydadzą się na przyszłość.
Pozdrawiam
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:43:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:16:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:34:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:18:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:14:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:20:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
NorthCrab (2023-01-16 10:11:02+00:00): Witaj, proszę nie przyłączaj elementów symboliczny (tu: footway) do elementów rzeczywistych (tu: obrys placu zabaw). Takie działanie nie ma żadnej funkcjonalności, a utrudnia to przyszłe edycje i utrzymanie mapy. Nawigowanie zakończy się tam gdzie jest koniec ścieżki, nie będzie ono kontynuowane na obrysie playground.

Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab (2023-01-16 10:12:55+00:00): Widzę że nie ty byłeś oryginalnym autorem przyłączenia ale dotknąłeś tych zmian (i powiększyłeś to przyłączenie) dlatego informuje na przyszłość. Zmiany te poprawię.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:13:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
streckenkundler (2025-11-07 17:10:59+00:00): Hei,
durch einen so ziemlich weltweiten revert (vgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174330042)  bin ich auf dieses CS gestoßen. Ein User hatte blind highway=yes durch highway=road ersetzt und das wurde revertet. Ich schaue mir gerade einige wenige Fälle in Deutschland an.

Du hast hier am Gebäude "Alte Residenz" ein highway=yes gesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196963646 

Daß das eine irrtümliche Fehleingabe war, ist klar, sowas passiert mir auch gelegentlich. Weist du noch, was beabsichtigt war? Vielleicht irgendwas mit heritage oder historic?

Danke streckenkundler