piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jack Karelse (2024-12-31 07:53:12+00:00): leisure=wehartelijk bedankt!
Jack Karelse (2024-12-31 07:59:28+00:00): leisure=welness is prima passend. Dank je!
eggie (2024-12-31 08:01:59+00:00): Jack  Of het zichtbaar wordt op de kaart is nog de vraag. De standaardkaart laat niet alles zien.
De zoutgrot is wel vindbaar nu op de kaart bij een zoekslag.
shop=beauty rendert wel, maar of dat als vlag de lading dekt?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=beauty
Up to you. 
Groet
eggie
Jack Karelse (2024-12-31 08:13:30+00:00): nee, shop/beauty dekt de lading niet.

Op Facebook wordt de OSM gebruikt (het staat bij onze fb-pagina). Maar op dat kaartje staat de locatie niet goed. Daar was ik voor aan het knutselen. En het is wel leuk, denk ik. Dank je voor je moeite!(https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100085868357579&sk=about)
cubbe8 (2025-01-01 01:53:23+00:00): Does not exist anymore, please stop adding roads without in person evidence
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2025-01-15 16:05:30+00:00): Hi, Cubbe8! 
My name is Yuliya, and I am the Quality Control Lead on the OSM team at Lyft. The road was added twice based on the evidence described in this comment https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161199147. According to our best practices, we do not amend changes that are more recent than our evidence. Unfortunately, it is quite challenging to notice that the road was previously removed and to realize that we are contradicting your recent changes. We will adjust our policy to reduce the occurrence of such cases. Thank you once again for your information, and please accept our apologies.

Best regards, Yuliya
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160821318
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-29 04:00:23+00:00): Added missing top-level tag (office=engineer) to ParamountBuilt POI so it is actually useful, and fixed phone number formatting in changeset 183332206

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332206
Colbertson (2025-01-31 09:44:42+00:00): Why did you change the tags on some buildings to residential landuse?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289528507
mikefalzon (2025-01-31 10:45:17+00:00): Building should refer to a single building. in many places large blocks of separate buildings have been merged as a single massive building. Residential landuse refers to an area which is primarily residential, so suitable to apply to a group of buildings. It is understood that a building entity would be  either a single unit or possibly a group of units e.g. a block of flats, but there is a specific tag for that.
eggie (2024-12-31 10:17:29+00:00): Oke.. maar wat is leisure=yes ..
Geen leisure=wellness ?
Gr eggie
Jack Karelse (2024-12-31 12:20:10+00:00): dat weet ik niet. Ik heb dat niet gewijzigd; ik dacht dat jij dat gedaan had (dat er geen extra aanduiding voor leisure (soort leisure) nodig is. Ik zag ook 'Vrije tijd'
eggie (2024-12-31 12:27:56+00:00): Nee.. Je hebt het zelf veranderd. Zie hier.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160822538

Wanneer je klikt op de blauwe adresnode zie je wat en wie iets heeft aangepast.
Je zou het zelf weer kunnen aanpassen.
Geef maar een seintje als het niet mocht lukken.
Gr eggie
eggie (2024-12-31 12:28:31+00:00): De wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dwellness
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-28 12:29:47+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12464908598/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Larmax (2025-05-28 18:52:01+00:00): Is it in a building new building that isn't on the map yet or should it be inside Fressi?
Liberman Communications (2025-06-02 10:49:55+00:00): Same building as Fressi, literally in the same facilities.
Sakari_N (2025-06-04 19:41:11+00:00): Is the name tag value appropriate? In the website they self-refer themselfs as SUHK, the legal company name is "Suomen Urheiluhierontakeskus Suhk Oy" but name= should be (for example) "The most prominent name on a sign posted on the feature itself" so I'm willing to bet that this should be name=SUHK
Larmax (2025-06-05 18:00:30+00:00): Why is the node in the parking lot and not in the building same building as fressi then?
Kovoschiz (2024-12-31 12:12:00+00:00): `=wastewater_plant` is for treatment plants only. This is `=pumping_station`
alan_gr (2025-01-15 11:24:19+00:00): Hola
Veo que has etiquetado este sendero con "access=no", quiere decir que actualmente está cerrado? Sé que estaba abierto hace poco.
Un saludo
jmgallardom (2025-01-15 12:22:27+00:00): Hola
Mi intención fue indicar no acceso a vehículos , si a pie
Gracias por la aclaración
Un saludo
totera (2024-12-31 16:14:16+00:00): Ciao dambuster80, per favore non scrivere tutto in maiuscolo; usalo soltanto quando necessario https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:name#Nomi_in_Maiuscolo_o_minuscolo?
dambuster80 (2024-12-31 16:19:28+00:00): Hai perfettamente ragione, è stata una mia svista facendo copia incolla.
Ho sistemato l'errore.
Grazie
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-31 09:10:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/916451464

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2025-01-01 11:02:33+00:00): juz poprawione
Patchi (2025-01-01 07:44:52+00:00): Bonjour olimago,

Petite question relative à l'ajout du tag bus=no sur la route de Vaison-la-Romaine et l'avenue de Verdun car les lignes de transport en commun de la région (Zou! 911 et bus K de Carpentras) passent jusqu'à présent par cette route, notamment pour desservir l'arrêt Palivettes. Y-a t'il un nouvel itinéraire pour ces lignes de bus ? 

Bonne continuation,

Patchi.
olimago (2025-01-02 09:24:23+00:00): Salut,

Oui j'ai vu mais je me suis dit que l'itinéraire des lignes de transport en commun de la région était prioritaire sur le bus=no, comme une exception ?
Le panneau bus interdit concerne peut-être plus les bus touristiques au quel cas je pourrais remplacer par "tourist_bus" pour éviter l’ambiguïté ?

Concernant les lignes en elle même, il faudrait que je vérifie car par exemple l'arrêt "Mairie" n'est pas matérialisé sur le terrain. Celui des Palivettes oui par contre.

Merci pour ta vigilance !
Patchi (2025-01-02 10:11:30+00:00): Bonjour Olimago,

Merci pour ton retour. Je pense que ta proposition "bus=no" => "tourist_bus=no" est judicieuse, vu que c'est un coin quand même assez touristique. J'ai remarqué (merci pour tes photos panoramax) que la signalisation au rond-point des Remparts interdisait les PLs et bus (touristiques) vers la route de Vaison mais au rond-point Place de l'Eglise cette interdiction est indiquée vers l'Avenue des Remparts. Il y aurait donc un sens pour la circulation des PLs et bus > 3,5t (ce qui est presque logique pour rejoindre le Ventoux et la D 974 sans bloquer la circulation au croisement). Donc ta proposition "tourist_bus=no" a vraiment du bon, mais il faudrait sans doute la mettre uniquement dans un sens de circulation.

Pour l'arrêt "Mairie" il a été posé il y a très longtemps en tant que transport à la demande du réseau Trans'CoVe. Il ne fait même pas parti des arrêts de ce réseau selon le GTFS de ce réseau mais je n'ai jamais osé le retirer. Je pense tout de même que cet arrêt n'existe plus depuis bien longtemps (et en étant passé plusieurs fois par cet endroit je ne l'ai jamais trouvé).

Bonne continuation,

Patchi.
olimago (2025-01-03 09:19:06+00:00): Ah oui pour le rond point Place de l'église c'est moi qui me suis trompé, désolé.
J'ai corrigé dans le changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160939364, si je ne me suis pas trompé. (Et celui ci, j'avais oublié le hgv :/ https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160939437)

Merci
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-28 14:55:45+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1347535454/history has shop = launderette that was added in this edit
Is it shop=laundry ? If not, how it differs from shop=laundry? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=laundry
Richard Morris Salix (2025-12-28 16:49:49+00:00): Indeed it should be laundry
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-29 06:54:31+00:00): thanks for a fix!
mga_geo (2025-01-01 09:45:43+00:00): Bonjour,
Attention aux relations "route=bus" lors des modifications, au moins deux relations ont été cassées : r7091938,r12255744
J'ai corrigé.
Bonne année et plein de bonnes contributions
Marc
alix_geovelo (2025-01-02 14:37:54+00:00): Merci pour votre  oeuil à nouveau ! 
Je pensais être prudent à ce sujet des relations. mais je vais l'être un peu plus encore :) Je vais en reparler avec mon collègue en interne aussi.

Belle année pleines de contributions à vous,
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-31 10:20:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1222913992

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
chris66 (2024-12-31 12:20:35+00:00): Du Spaßbremse :-)

Guten Rutsch 
Chris
sykul (2025-01-01 12:41:09+00:00): Thanks for the correction. I didn't know language tags go on the value rather than the key. Does that mean we can only choose one language's Wikipedia to link? If so, since this is in the Gaeltacht and describing an Irish-language writer, shouldn't we prefer the 'ga' tag?
mueschel (2025-01-01 12:49:49+00:00): You can add the language to the key like you did, if it's necessary to add more than one Wiki link.

But: There's no need to link to more than one Wiki entry in OSM - all the 20 different language versions are easily accessible by Wikipedias own directory. Only in rare cases this doesn't work, e.g. if there is no direct equivalent page in different languages.
sykul (2025-01-01 16:22:24+00:00): Thanks. I'll just change it to the Irish language tag then, since that was the preferred language of the subject.
vasony (2025-01-01 09:57:38+00:00): Szia!

Biztos, hogy az egész utca Csillebérc utca lett?
A Magas út felőli végén lévő házak mintha Moha közre lettek volna számozva:
ez pl.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322915675

Tamás
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-31 10:50:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/921318936

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2025-01-01 11:05:29+00:00): poprawione
AndreasTUHU (2025-02-21 08:45:17+00:00): Szia,
Ezzel a módosításcsomaggal létrehoztál egy 
 "S700": Széchenyihegy => Hűvösvölgy (18485931), v1 

kapcsolatot a régebbi
 "S700": Széchenyihegy => Hűvösvölgy (11579633), v11 
kapcsolat mellé. Ez véletlen duplázás, törölhető?

Köszönöm,
András
leveskockaa (2025-02-21 08:57:33+00:00): Szia!

Nem véletlen, időrendben a második (18485931) az első variánsa, nem áll meg Hárshegy állomáson.

leveskockaa
AndreasTUHU (2025-02-21 09:31:53+00:00): Szia,
Értem, köszönöm a választ!
Üdv,
András
chris66 (2025-01-27 09:14:56+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1347551326

ja, das ist das neue 110 kv Umspannwerk, wie die WN heute berichtete.
Sanniu (2025-01-01 09:52:41+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!
Can you, please, adhere to Israel naming conventions https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#Naming when naming streets.
Can you give some descriptive name for your changeset? (e.g. Added street name)
YotamMadlan (2025-01-01 10:01:33+00:00): Hi Sanniu! 
Thanks for the feedback. 
Quick question: how do I edit this changeset? I would like to add the comment you have asked to add ("Added street name" to the changeset), and not sure how to do it.
Sanniu (2025-01-01 10:07:49+00:00): Hi, for my knowledge there is no way to edit closed changeset, that note was for future contributions.
YotamMadlan (2025-01-01 10:14:59+00:00): Thanks, I appreciate it. I will definitely bear this tip in mind for the future.
okainov (2025-01-17 10:30:33+00:00): Hi!

I see you have updated a few roads in historic ruins in Oman using tag "digitalEgypt", was this intended? The footways were marked intentionally, what was the reason for this change?
little_maper (2025-01-19 12:36:16+00:00): Hello okainov;
Thank you for reaching out.
I updated roads based on a few cars that appear in the satellite image in this area and thank you for your edits.
Regards
little_maper
okainov (2025-01-19 13:17:22+00:00): Some of those streets are not even wide enough for cars and you should be able to clearly see those are ruins.
little_maper (2025-01-19 13:52:45+00:00): Hello okainov;
Thank you for bringing my attention to that and happy mapping!
Regards
little_maper
SomeoneElse (2025-01-21 02:01:58+00:00): A bit more info - there's a discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mass-edits-by-digitalegypt-not-aligned-with-reality/124533 .  It'd be great if you could comment there.
KKS (2025-01-05 21:06:16+00:00): А в чому сенс ставити обмеження розвороту там де розворот дозволений?
stanissay (2025-01-06 05:37:45+00:00): Дозволив розворот
MarcoR (2025-01-03 08:15:02+00:00): Ciao!

Se non è di dimensioni "monumentali" sarebbe più corretto historic=memorial; vedi la pagina wiki per maggiori info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:historic=monument#Attenzione

Buon mapping,
Marco
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160828322
MarcoR (2025-01-03 08:26:06+00:00): Ciao!

Se non è di dimensioni "monumentali" sarebbe più corretto historic=memorial; vedi la pagina wiki per maggiori info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:historic=monument#Attenzione

Buon mapping,
Marco
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160828322
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 04:23:44+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164574260
Gregory Peony (2025-04-14 21:12:28+00:00): Overall a good contribution but you mapped the light and dark side of pitched roofs (I flagged these). Keep in mind roof shapes and how the scene is lit when mapping. See how I mapped them in Changeset: 164957877
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160828457
anshanin (2025-02-22 13:34:11+00:00): Please don't remove addressees from the OSM. I spent my own time to research it.
Example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12196980136/history
mavl (2025-02-05 14:02:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162167075 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: wrong values for name:en - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161608012].
Davie Dean (2025-01-15 03:04:41+00:00): I suspect you didn't mean for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1347560797 to be farmyard?
Davie Dean (2025-01-15 03:05:33+00:00): Although the comment says farmyard, so maybe I'm wrong.
kadiwa (2025-03-01 12:31:46+00:00): Wieso hast du bei Heselstücken Tempo 30 eingetragen aber den Tag maxspeed:type=DE:urban so gelassen? Das ist doch wiedersprüchlich. Außerdem ist das definitiv keine Wohnstraße.
b-unicycling (2025-04-01 17:53:36+00:00): Hi Brian, this contains a broken relation (13285410) now.
kadiwa (2024-12-31 12:09:46+00:00): Wurde das abgesprochen, die Straßen systematisch an die offiziellen Klassifizierungen anzupassen? Ich finde nämlich, dass die teilweise nicht so richtig gut passt.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-31 12:28:12+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 160402845, 160414208, 160414545, 160507520, 160507718, 160507898, 160518845, 160552734, 160553266, 160554955, 160657362, 160657471, 160684362, 160684739, 160684924, 160734970, 160735012, 160735032, 160735273, 160735327, 160735354, 160735416, 160735453, 160735608, 160735665, 160735764, 160735817, 160735908, 160758362, 160760523.
rhhs (2026-05-23 18:04:06+00:00): Are you sure these tracks deserve sac_scale=demanding_mountain_hiking? Normally this only occurs for narrow and slightly dangerous mountain paths. The description is "Obstacles like boulders. Exposed areas ordinarily secured with fixed ropes or chains. Use of hands for balance potentially needed. 	Portions of the route exposed with danger of falling. Trail may have unmarked portions and cross fields of loose scree or talus." https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sac_scale
VictorIE (2025-01-01 01:57:39+00:00): Hi,

This wood is a single-node way.
VictorIE (2025-01-01 15:10:21+00:00): Also, lots of double-mapped buildings here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1347566706
Dafo43 (2025-01-01 15:52:15+00:00): Removed the duplicate buildings. Don't see the single node Wood, though I did remove a few areas tagged as a wood, as they weren't.
VictorIE (2025-01-01 16:47:41+00:00): Hi, 

Sorry, I forgot to include the way number https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217418398/history
eggie (2024-12-31 12:43:10+00:00): Dag Walnis,

Meestal zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van eenrichtingsverkeer. Is dat hier het geval. Dan toevoegen
:  oneway:bicycle=no

en meestal dus ook voor mofa en moped.
Pas dan routeert het weer goed voor fietsers. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-12-31 12:51:29+00:00): And in English: two-wheelers are usually exempt from one-way traffic. Is that the case here? Then add
...  oneway:bicycle=no
Walnis (2024-12-31 12:56:15+00:00): In this case, there is only a "one way" traffic sign. There is no info board permitting bicycles, mopeds or mofa
eggie (2024-12-31 13:00:47+00:00): I had a sneek few at streetview (I know.. not allowed)  but there is an extra sign underneath the traffic_sign oneway=street
That tells u ther is an exception for bicycle.
At one end of the street the extra sign is missing indeed.
But I i'm sure oneway:bicycle=no is the right tag.
eggie (2024-12-31 13:01:28+00:00): I will send you a PM.
kadiwa (2024-12-31 12:40:20+00:00): Kannst du mir bitte antworten? Einmal das E-Mail-Postfach checken.
Cyrille37 (2025-06-22 15:55:52+00:00): Hi Nona

I know you have fresher imagery than us so I try to not touch your work.

But I think there is error here with some "lanes=4", on 2 ways it makes 8 lanes :-)

Tanks & regards
Cyrille37 (2025-06-22 15:57:13+00:00): And the way is a Provincial road with "ref=RP7023" so it should be "highway=tertiary" not primary. Don't you think ?
nona mostafa (2025-06-23 13:19:33+00:00): Hi Cyrille37,
First of all, I am happy to communicate with you.
Regarding "lanes=4," on 2 ways it makes 8 lanes. This tag was added by another user, so I preferred not to modify it, but I will fix it based on the latest imagery. As for changing the classification to tertiary, I agree with you and will update the road classification. For the same reason, the road was classified by another user, so I preferred not to interfere.
Best regards,
nona mostafa
literan (2025-01-01 14:18:16+00:00): зачем этот тег? дворовые проезды не имеют названий по умолчанию
Colbertson (2025-01-08 11:04:20+00:00): Hey, just letting you know you made a typo with "ukrainian_orthodox3"
vmanulik (2025-01-08 13:59:47+00:00): Thank you a lot!
Osmwithspace (2025-01-14 08:56:13+00:00): Bitte achte darauf Öffnungszeiten und Telefonnummern in der richtigen Schreibweise anzugeben. Siehe
https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone
Nathan_A_RF (2025-01-04 01:15:04+00:00): Hi, please remember to change the maxspeed:type tags when changing maxspeed tags
HellMap (2024-12-31 16:36:53+00:00): Atkal šajā un 160833448 izmaiņā ir izdzēsti nevis laboti elementi (parks, celiņi, ēka, teritorija), soli sazīmēti kā sienas (par, ko jau minēts), nodzēsts adrešu punkts, pazaudēts ielas nosaukums. Tā kā visas šīs problēmas iepriekš minētas un dažas no tām jau daudz reižu, kā iepriekš minēju, es vairs individuāli nelabošu katru tavu izmaiņu. Šis izmaiņas atcēlu.
eggie (2024-12-31 13:56:21+00:00): Yep.... Er zijn denk ik maar weinig zoutgrotten :)
Hier heb je de hele tag weer verwijderd.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160831917

Die leisure, amenity, shop, e.d. zijn nodig om een zoekslag te maken in de juiste categorie in een app.
Wanneer je het algemeen wilt houden dan zou leisure=yes nog kunnen. 
leisure=wellness komt denk ik het dichtste bij.
Wanneer en in een zoutbad zou kunnen zitten zou iets met leisure=spa nog kunnen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dspa
In OSM gebruikersland is het soms ook een zoektocht. 
amenity=spa is ook al weer afgekeurd zie ik.
Succes met de zoektocht.

Groet
eggie
Syl (2024-12-31 13:38:03+00:00): Hello, I change the type of some parking you create, it's "street_side" not "surface".
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2025-01-01 11:01:05+00:00): Shouldn't Balti jaam refer to the train station? How is this a bus station? Can you buy long distance ticket here? Have I missed something? IMO Bussijaam at Lastekodu/Juhkentali should remain the only bus station to avoid confusion.
Apirnus (2025-01-01 12:30:12+00:00): During the change I refered to the OSM wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbus_station

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstation

Since here can enter only PEÜTK (Põhja-Eesti Ühistranspordi keskus) allowed transport, it is not allowed for usual traffic. Here only buses stop, the regional buses. Couple of local TLT buses but others are regional buses. No long distance buses in the classical meaning altho buses here do connect cities that could be under special occasions still be considered long distance buses. But according to OSM wiki, there is no such distinction between long distance buses and other bus route types. The requirement is public transport which buses here that stop definitely are, besides other requirements that 
Balti jaam has two public transports - train and buses. If bus station is wrong, then railway station should be expanded to accomodate both of these terminals.
This is not a bus depot too where buses stay overnight or get serviced like TLT has at Kadaka tee.
The other way here would be this but it doesn't exactly suite well also:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dplatform

Either way, it is not a parking lot there, its a place where numerous bus routes start and end along with possible route change between other public transportation methods namely train, railway and local TLT buses.
Buses may park there overnight but its only for PEÜTK allowed buses.

Unless there is something more definitive or better to use instead of amenity=bus_station or public_transport=station for which I am open to use here instead, instead of just deleting the parking lot.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2025-01-01 19:23:32+00:00): The train station belongs to GO property. Bus stops are on municipal ground. They are not one and the same thing.

What I'm afraid of is that this may mislead some tourist, since we actually have one main bus station in Tallinn.

At least the name is incorrect. There is no such bus station, only bus stops.

I hope someone else expresses their opinion on this topic.
IvanBabić (2025-01-12 19:41:00+00:00): Reverted because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161285374
Jakka (2024-12-31 20:00:14+00:00): Zie persoonlijk bericht om aan te passen
SomeoneElse (2024-12-31 22:41:33+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for updating this here.  It looks like NCN12 also routes over that new bit of cycleway, so I've added that too.
Best Regards,
Andy
aTarom (2024-12-31 14:13:11+00:00): Hola, bienvenido a OSM!!! para las direcciones que no tienen número de portal, disponemos de un tag específico
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nohousenumber
Saludos
IvaKraljić (2025-01-13 21:39:51+00:00): The wrong tags were used. #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161325852
Bosgeluk (2024-12-31 14:05:35+00:00): to be more precise a small stretch of the Putterweg is renamed
eggie (2024-12-31 15:11:16+00:00): Dag yoghurtsoes
Je vraagt feedback. Lijkt me oke zo.
Gr eggie
IvaKraljić (2025-01-13 21:35:08+00:00): The changeset was reverted because of wrong tags.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161325615 #OptimoRoute