piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ivanbranco (2024-04-27 22:11:39+00:00): Praia without water?
burrscurr (2025-02-10 13:49:54+00:00): Hi Tatrafan_2050,

mir ist in diesem Changeset ein Problem mit dem hinzugefügten Gehweg way/1276574724 aufgefallen. Grundsätzlich kann man Gehwege sowohl als separate Linie (wie im Changeset) bzw. durch Tags an der zugehörigen Straße erfassen (so wie vorher). Beide Varianten haben ihre Vor- und Nachteile. Was besser ist, hängt von der Situation ab (und leider auch etwas davon, wen man fragt). (An der Leipziger Straße ist der Gehweg direkt an der Straße, aus meiner Sicht wäre eher ein Grenzfall fürs Mapping als separaten Weg.)

Falls von einer Variante zur anderen gewechselt wird, sollten aber zumindest die Tags von der Straße zum separaten Gehweg bzw. umgekehrt übertragen werden. Aktuell gibt es doppelte Informationen (sidewalk=both an der Straße), Infos die an dem separaten Weg fehlen (wie z.B. Fahrradfreigabe durch sidewalk:both:bicycle=yes) aber auch neue Tags am separaten Weg, die jemand später mit StreetComplete hinzugefügt hat (surface=asphalt für den Bürgerstreig). Mapping von separaten Gehwegen ist also leider nicht so einfach, wie man im ersten Moment denken könnte.

Kannst du bitte versuchen, die Dopplungen zwischen dem separat gemapptem Weg und den normalen Straßen bitte auflösen? Danke fürs Mappen und noch einen schönen Tag!

burrscurr
Tatrafan_2050 (2025-02-10 14:48:42+00:00): Hallo burrscurr,
Vielen Dank für deinen ausführlichen Hinweis!
Ich persönlich bin (wie man sicherlich sieht) ein Verfechter des separaten Erfassens von Straße, Bürgersteig und Fahrradweg, sofern eine bauliche Trennubng besteht; dass ich das an dieser Stelle nicht sehr sauber begonnen habe, stimmt allerdings.
Da ich mir die Leipziger Straße in den nächsten Wochen ohnehin nochmal "in Echt" ansehen werde, sollte ich diesen Fehler dann auch ausbessern können.
Danke nochmals für dein Adlerauge auf die Kartenqualität! ;)
ivanbranco (2024-04-27 22:11:21+00:00): A glacier, really?
ivanbranco (2024-04-27 23:29:24+00:00): Hi, you changed a garden into a beach: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086073446 

was it intended?
dcapillae (2024-04-27 06:58:31+00:00): Buenos días.

Algunas ediciones se han revertido. La etiqueta «name» no se usa para añadir descripciones. El vial es de tipo «service» conforme a las convenciones de OSM.

Si necesita ayuda para empezar a mapear, por favor, consulte la guía de principiantes: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide.

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
Réjean (2024-04-26 21:59:07+00:00): Meant pedestrians and CYCLISTS
dcapillae (2024-04-27 06:54:24+00:00): Buenos días.

Este conjunto de cambios fue revertido. El objeto modificado se refiere a un centro ciudadano. La asociación ya tiene su propio objeto en el mapa: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8328600675.

Si necesita ayuda para empezar a mapear, por favor, consulte la guía de principiantes: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide.

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
DD1GJ (2024-04-26 22:54:46+00:00): illegale Gleisüberquerung entfernt
ivanbranco (2024-04-27 23:30:55+00:00): Here again, you changed an element to beach: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/666828670

why so?
tekim (2024-07-22 14:14:30+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for the edits.  One tip - please don't add fords where they don't exist. It is ok to leave a warning unaddressed if you don't have evidence as to the on-the-ground situation.  This way another mapper that does have this information will see it and can make the correct change.
ivanbranco (2024-04-27 23:32:19+00:00): This is clearly not a beach, why you tagged it as such?
Muhmaker (2024-04-27 16:44:54+00:00): Hello Leonardo Gutierrez,
in this changeset you have changed a hiking route in Germany to a bus route. I suspect that this was an unfortunate mistake. Or is there an important reason for this change? Is it okay if I undo your change?
Leonardo Gutierrez (2024-04-27 17:59:18+00:00): Hello, thank you, it was my mistake. I thought I had reverted the change and forgot to make sure. Please reverse it yourself, thank you
Leonardo Gutierrez (2024-04-28 19:36:49+00:00): thanks for making the corrections of my mistakes, greetings from Colombia, and from trufi association, we are creating bus routes in peru, and the work has been frenetic, that's why I made this mistake.
Muhmaker (2024-04-28 20:30:38+00:00): Greetings back from Germany. I'm checking the quality of the mapped bus routes in parts of Germany and I noticed your change because it was shown as faulty by the quality assurance software i use. The repair was done quickly.
jnighan (2024-05-15 18:12:19+00:00): Hi, Zack, looks like you accidentally changed a nature reserve (that had accurate property lines) into a swamp (that still has operator tag)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/962978586/history

If you're mapping natural features where a nature reserve exists, please just delete the tag "natural=wood" from the nature reserve but leave it intact, and add other features as separate areas/ways/polygons. Thanks
LegzDev (2024-04-27 00:00:49+00:00): Hola, primeramente felicitarte por el trabajo que estás realizando en OpenStreetMap.

En un intento de estandarizar el etiquetado de las bodegas, hemos llegado al acuerdo de usar la etiqueta shop=convenience, para más información revise el siguiente enlace:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Cuba/Bodega

También te animo a unirte al grupo de Telegram de OSM Cuba (https://t.me/OSM_Cuba) si así lo deseas.
raphaelmirc (2025-05-18 23:46:30+00:00): Essa estrada deveria ser mapeada como unclassified 

favor corrigir.
ivanbranco (2024-04-27 23:34:31+00:00): Why did you add a fake beach?
DD1GJ (2024-04-26 22:54:15+00:00): illegale Gleisüberquerung entfernt
joel56dt (2025-01-01 04:08:33+00:00): Hi meisoof, I wanted to point out a few issues I have found with this changeset:
1) Traffic signals should be mapped at the stop line of the way coming in to the intersection instead of exiting the intersection (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals)
2) King Edward Street and United Boulevard are not a dual-carriageways since there is no physical barrier separating the two directions.

Do you want to try to fix these issues before I take a look? Thanks, Joel
joel56dt (2025-02-24 03:39:24+00:00): Hi meisoof, I have begun working to fix the errors you introduced in this changeset.
borovac (2024-05-21 21:43:11+00:00): Hi kentact,

Could you please explain why you use the tag “destination:lang:sr” and other variants? When we look at the wiki page for that tag, we see that it is abandoned and not in use (see here).

I’m curious if you contacted the community before adding those characters en masse, as I don’t see any discussion about it anywhere. The official forum for OpenStreetMap in Serbia can be found here.

I kindly request that you start a topic related to this issue on the official channel. Until a consensus is reached regarding adding the “destination:lang:*” tag, I recommend temporarily stopping further additions. Otherwise, I will write a complaint to DWG regarding this matter.

These decisions should be made collectively within the community, rather than by an individual setting rules unilaterally.

I saw that you added to 2257 relations. I would like to ask you once again to stop adding until you have agreed and received approval from the OSM Serbia community.

All best borovac
silversurfer83 (2024-04-28 16:51:12+00:00): Moin :)

meinst du nicht, dass sports_centre ein bisschen hoch gegriffen ist für ein simples Schützenhaus mit einer Schießanlage?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dsports_centre

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150560023
ivanbranco (2024-04-27 23:36:25+00:00): Another fake beach
dankarran (2024-05-31 11:10:16+00:00): What an odd numbering scheme!
yelisey90 (2024-04-27 09:06:14+00:00): Hi! I've partly reverted your edit:
- tree location is based on a more precise aerial imagery, than Bing;
- adjusted flowerbed accordingly;
- fixed the city & street name for the tree (kept them in English, although in Georgia tags without language suffixes usually contain Georgian names)
- reinstated "broadleaved" in leaf_type: according to wiki, "palm" is deprecated, and see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree/List_of_Genus,_Leaf_cycle,_Leaf_type
Awo (2024-04-30 19:10:29+00:00): Hi. ok no problem.
RemiCH (2024-05-19 11:20:35+00:00): Hello Saig Omaristos,
the bike parking space that you have just added was already present in the OSM database.
Your addition creates an unnecessary duplicate which distorts the data. Could you either update this? (by removing one or the other).
If you have been using Osm Go since then, pay attention to the tags displayed on your app to avoid this type of mishap.
Very sincerely
tekim (2024-04-28 20:27:26+00:00): reverting a changeset with fake edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150635578
Matyáš Richter (2024-04-28 06:36:43+00:00): Sorry about this. We could have just reverted my changesets... Like I said in my reply to you, I was under the impression that metropolitan city roads are marked by a white octagon symbol, while in this case, essentially every multi-lane road was tagged as secondary. Is the classification not given by the markings? I apologise if I misunderstood the wiki article, next time I will make sure to consult it beforehand...
SekeRob (2024-04-27 08:12:37+00:00): Hi,

You're the second one coming in from outside fixing bus routes around pescara, the first, gigi2037 declaring 'invalid route' whatever that means, and each time a bunch of alerts are raised. This time Fontanelle-Via Chiesa and v.v. These are 2 routes, now a bunch of bus stops are reported as being on the wrong side i.e. linked to the wrong one of the 2. Please fix.

thanks
osm-pt-account 😎 (2024-04-28 11:46:22+00:00): Hi,
which relation do you mean and what is the problem?

Regards
SekeRob (2024-04-28 12:17:00+00:00): The Fontanelle - Via Chiesa as I mentioned is actually listed in your change set relations list. By consequence the bus stops shown on the wrong side of the road versus route direction belong to the route in the opposite direction (of which they are on quick check already a member, but also a bunch of stops mapped but not linked to the route.)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9646754
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/273385
With what  I know now, lots of roundabouts need splitting where the routes do a full loop but that's of lesser concern, a laborious thing to do without the right tools and daily practicing.

ciao
SekeRob repair (2024-09-21 17:52:41+00:00): 5 months on discovered you deleted junction tags on a roundabout (100% signed like that too) and turned it into a bi-directional loop. Routers don't know how to deal with such... Now reverted.

ciao
osm-pt-account 😎 (2024-09-23 19:55:50+00:00): Thank you for the undo.
user_11609320 (2024-04-27 01:14:55+00:00): I shuttle is not oc bus, but it is managed by octa. octa has three bus systems. Bravo is the express bus service, oc bus is the local bus service, and Ishuttle is the contract bus lines for irvine. this does not include irvine connect
tekim (2024-04-28 20:22:32+00:00): reverting a changeset with fake edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150635424
NeisBot (2024-04-27 02:04:02+00:00): Hello SM031, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
5m4u9 (2024-04-27 07:56:28+00:00): Hola, qué genial que empiezas a añadir más rutas de buses. tengo algunas sugerencias en las etiquetas.

1. las paradas no deben tener la etiqueta (amenity=bus_station), esa etiqueta es para las terminales de buses

2. en las relaciones el nombre sigue este formato: <tipo de bus> ###: Nombre parada inicial → nombre parada final /// Sin Av. ni C.

3. Si añades las paradas iniciales y finales en la relación, deben llevan el nombre de la calle/avenida transversal (la que cruza en 90° o aprox) y no el nombre sobre la misma calle del auto. En este caso sería: MiniBus 893: Reyesano → Río Abuná

4. la etiqueta "fee" en la relación no es para el precio, sino para decir que el recorrido es "de pago" y debe estar el valor "fee=yes"

5. para decir que vale Bs. 2, debes añadir la etiqueta charge=2 BOB

6. Las paradas deben estar al lado derecho del recorrido de la relación y no sobre la vía, es decir, donde se recoge a los pasajeros.
ottwiz (2024-04-27 13:21:16+00:00): *add roads, just auto correct corrected it right away when they uploaded.

Quoting them right away from discord.
vaibhavnz (2024-05-11 22:34:31+00:00): Don't think its ever been an official name or anything, but coincidentally the developer of this area is named "Maurice Clark"
vaibhavnz (2024-05-11 22:36:05+00:00): Oh it appears I made the edit a few years back! Haha interesting.
ivanbranco (2024-04-27 21:52:45+00:00): Three beaches without water?
Jordi MF (2024-04-28 10:08:10+00:00): Hola Motores,

Veo que has eliminado gran parte de eta zona mapeada por tú mismo hace años. Eliminarla por el simple hecho de haber cambiado de propietarios no es correcto. Otro caso sería que todos esos elementos hayan dejado de existir, però por tu explicación no parece ser el caso.

Revertir todo el borrado es relativamente fácil, pero me gustaría estar seguro de si existe o no. Si el acceso es privado, podemos añadir etiquetas que impidan el ruteamiento por dentro de dicho espacio (access=private).

Pero si la información puede observarse desde las ortofotos, no veo motivo para eliminar una información que refleja tan bien la realidad.

Saludos
jmarchon (2024-04-28 02:50:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Nice work!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-28 21:29:23+00:00): Lots of duplications
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150563273
felipeeugenio (2024-04-30 18:32:19+00:00): Hola Anto4nt0
Acabo de estar harto rato reparando esto. Duplicaste básicamente todo lo que tocaste.

Esto es seguramente porque interrumpiste la subida de datos de JOSM en la mitad.
por favor ten cuidado con ese editor, en realidad es para maperos mas avanzados.
Por favor lee el mail que te envié y conversamos de todo en el chat de la comunidad. Saludos
Anto4nt0 (2024-05-01 01:18:11+00:00): Perdón :( no quiero ser una carga, tendré más cuidado, es que estoy haciendo un proyecto para la u y como no sé mucho de esto he tenido bastantes dificultades y por otras razones, pero intento de aprender lo que puedo y lo que el tiempo me permite.
felipeeugenio (2024-05-01 01:21:15+00:00): Hola. Gracias por la actitud

Estamos para ayudar. 
En un mensaje interno te mandé las coordenadas para que te metas al chat de la comunidad chilena de osm
tekim (2024-04-28 19:37:36+00:00): reverting a changeset that added fake data (not a park)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150633903
ivanbranco (2024-04-30 09:21:02+00:00): Hi Francisco,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190936240
this is a really small park, are you sure is correct?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1111167162
this as well, it even has a clinic inside

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1275483690/history
this doesn't look like a beach, it even overlaps a road

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1275483674/history
there's really a natural beach on a canal inside the city?

most of  your park and beach edits doesn't seem plausible, could I ask you why?
i2004 (2024-04-28 18:36:00+00:00): hola yo los puse los colores distintos por el ramal
AgusQui (2024-05-02 22:26:55+00:00): Esos colores no se están usando actualmente.
i2004 (2024-05-02 22:31:27+00:00): en las ramaleras de los coches nuevos si
tekim (2024-04-28 19:33:23+00:00): reverting a changeset that added fake data (this is not a park, it is a school)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150633744
indigomc (2024-05-03 18:42:49+00:00): Hi 
With regard to this changeset, are you sure about the status of Broadmead Road. I've not seen it for a couple of weeks, but I'm pretty certain it is still closed to vehicles, from the junction of St. Barnabas Road, up to the last house on the west side. It will remain closed for some years. See the OSM notes on the bridge for references. 

Thanks, indigomc
melody_Tej (2024-05-04 15:27:06+00:00): Proposed response:
Hi indigomc, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
indigomc (2024-05-05 10:00:50+00:00): Thank you. 
However, I checked it on the way home last night and there is no change. I therefore reverted your change just now.  
Note also that Google Maps seems to have taken your change as a signal, and since last week shows this bridge as open - it was marked closed there before.
Finally, if you follow the links referred to  in my original message (OSM notes and the 'note' key value on the bridge), it is clear that the bridge will not re-open for years.
melody_Tej (2024-05-06 11:34:00+00:00): Hi indigomc,

Thank you for the feedback and correcting the data as per your best knowledge. I will be more careful in the future.
Joseph R P (2024-10-10 19:07:21+00:00): Hello,

I have noticed that you have incorrectly changed a lot of residential streets to living streets. Do you have a reasoning for this?

Actual 'living streets' are very rare in the United States and are more of a European concept. This could be best described as small/short alley or driveway-like road that doubles as a pedestrian street, typically paved with bricks and has a low speed limit (like 5 mph), and is located in a more urbanized area. A road that prioritizes cars, like one paved with asphalt, has a driveway for each house, and has a 15 to 25 mph speed limit would not qualify as a living street.

I also noticed that you have changed the service roads in a nearby shopping center to tertiary roads. A tertiary road is is typically what you would call a collector road in the US. An example of this would be Palmetto Road, which sees more traffic than the residential streets which spur off of it, and it provides access between more major roads and destinations like commercial areas. The correct tags for the service roads you changed to tertiary here would still be service roads.
alexnder (2024-08-06 06:39:07+00:00): Ce-i cu punctul ăsta în mijlocul giratoriului?  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11059580232/history
cuzi (2024-04-27 10:34:31+00:00): It is not necessary to use placeholders like "xyz" if you don't know the name or another property. You can just leave the parts of the form blank, that you don't know
Glassman (2024-05-01 02:39:20+00:00): Again - please don't use descriptive names.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150564755
Supaplex (2024-04-27 16:35:48+00:00): ->變電所名稱
tastrax (2024-04-29 02:12:16+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
SekeRob (2024-04-27 13:51:28+00:00): Ciao,

L'ultima volta ti ho scritto riguardo alle forme di edifici importabili e mi hai assicurato che le stavi verificando tutte. Ho guardato a caso questi due. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1276710131 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1276710137
Gli edifici sono perfettamente paralleli alla strada, la forma non corrisponde alla realtà nella tua importazione, quindi ti chiedo di nuovo, per favore, di verificare gli edifici e di regolare la forma e l'allineamento o altrimenti di astenersi dall'utilizzare questo processo MWAI.

Ho fatto qualche correzione in questo set di modifiche
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150580464

Grazie.
nevw (2024-04-27 08:02:23+00:00): Name is not required for things that don’t really have a name
tekim (2024-04-27 22:21:00+00:00): This doesn't look like a beach.  It looks like an area where boats dock.  Also, we generally map beaches as areas, not nodes (aka points).
ivanbranco (2024-04-27 21:31:50+00:00): Testing what exactly?
tekim (2024-04-27 22:13:21+00:00): This doesn't look like a beach.
Allison P (2024-04-28 07:57:29+00:00): Testing whether they can get away with Pokévandalism.
Jonathan Ng@ (2024-04-27 11:14:33+00:00): 分开编辑
Supaplex (2024-04-28 14:27:51+00:00): 以中文為官方語言而官方規範的有台灣、香港、中國，其中台灣有台灣教育部(中華民國教育部)與台灣外交部(中華民國外交部)。貿然以你自己所在國的書寫規範寫name:zh 並不妥當，建議到 community.openstreetmap.org 討論取得大家能接受的共識再行編輯
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150565552
maraf24 (2024-04-27 13:57:48+00:00): Chodnik nie jest podłączony do żadnej drogi.
Na pewno nie ma możliwości wejścia na niego?
user_20731664 (2024-04-27 17:33:34+00:00): Jest od drogi
maraf24 (2024-04-27 18:01:10+00:00): To trzeba dodać na mapę, skąd nawigacja ma wiedzieć, że między chodnikiem o jezdnią nie ma głębokiego rowu?
dcapillae (2024-04-27 07:07:01+00:00): Los datos añadidos se han recuperado de este conjunto de cambios previo que fue revertido porque se añadieron al objeto equivocado: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150558266.
Nzau (2024-05-23 07:13:05+00:00): Salut karr4s,

Tu as ajouté un compteur à vélo au début de la VéloFrancette, je ne vois pas ou il ce situe sur place, aurais-tu une photo ?

A +
Enzo
karr4s (2024-05-23 10:42:04+00:00): Salut ! Oui, je prend une photo tout à l'heure.
En gros : il n'y a pas de compteur sur un porteau mais il y a clairement une installation au sol qui compte les vélo qui passent. J'ai vu ça à la forme sur le bitume qui fait une sortie de croisement, exactement comme pour les endroits où il y a des compteurs.
Nzau (2024-05-23 11:09:48+00:00): Ah top tu as sûrement raison, ça serait d'ailleurs super intéressant d'avoir le nombre de vélos qui passent ici chaque jour.
Au plaisir d'en discuter prochainement !
karr4s (2024-05-23 17:36:46+00:00): Voilà ce que ça donne : https://www.noelshack.com/2024-21-4-1716485697-img-20240523-172023.jpg

C'est pas évident à discerner donc j'ai rajouté un liseré rouge.

Alors du coup, j'ai deux hypothèses :
- soit c'est bien un compteur mais sans poteau qui affiche le nombre de passages
- Soit c'est les restes d'une précédente installation qui a été retirée (j'ai jeté un œil si je trouvais les traces de l'installation d'un poteau et je n'ai rien trouvé)

Et je confirme que je suis complètement pour demander les données brutes à Caen la Mer : après tout, c'est de l'argent publique qui finance ces installation. C'est légitime de demander que ces données soient rendues publiques.
Nzau (2024-05-28 06:50:35+00:00): Ah oui effectivement tu as l'œil ! 
Je pense que c'est toujours une installation en service.

Tout à fait d'accord, après vu qu'il s'agit d'un aménagement départemental, il faudrait directement demander au Calvados ! 
D'ailleurs connais-tu Mapéo ? On peut y visualiser les données du Calvados : https://mapeo.calvados.fr/carto/index.php

Au plaisir d'en discuter prochainement.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-10 12:12:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8296497/history

water=water=lake ?

Can you check your other similar edits for similar problems?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-10 12:14:04+00:00): Why you added name to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/587949401/history ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-13 09:30:26+00:00): Send PM now