piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tux67 (2026-03-21 20:15:29+00:00): Danke, wir brauchen das, was auf dem Schild beim verlassen des OT Viehstrasse in Richtung Tor steht. Kannst du den beschaffen? 
Den (Standard) Zustand des Tores dokumentieren wir mit:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:open bzw. open:conditional
Oder
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:locked

Gruß tux67
faulercycler (2026-03-23 18:46:05+00:00): kann man hier auch Fotos hochladen?
richtig wäre dann wohl:
highway=track
vehicle=agricultural
tux67 (2026-03-23 18:53:30+00:00): Direkt bei OSM geht das nicht mit den Fotos. Die App Streetcomplete bietet das an, oder du lädst das bild zu einem bilderhosting service und verlinkst darauf.
silversurfer83 (2026-03-20 21:32:52+00:00): Moin :)

gib mal bitte eine Quelle an. Danke
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180102310
silversurfer83 (2026-03-22 20:15:02+00:00): Und?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180102310
SG86 (2026-03-22 21:08:17+00:00): Hallo,
die Leitung ist gerade im Bau. Vor Ort ist die Leitung nicht zu übersehen.
g_j_m (2026-03-28 22:29:24+00:00): Unter
https://www.terranets-sel.de/trassenverlauf-sel/heidelberg-heilbronn
gibt es "Kartenmaterial zum Trassenverlauf im Maßstab 1:5.000"
z.B.
https://www.terranets-sel.de/fileadmin/terranets-bw-sel/Trassenverlauf/02-Heidelberg-Heilbronn/Trassenverlauf/terranetsbw_sel_trassenverlauf_heidelberg_leimen_1-5000.pdf
silversurfer83 (2026-03-29 07:24:22+00:00): @sg86 alles klar. Wie schon öfter erwähnt: Schreib bitte grundsätzlich deine Quelle an die Änderung. Das macht es später für alle besser nachvollziehbar.

@g_j_m auf der Seite und auf den einzelnen PDFs steht nichts schnell findbares zur Lizenz der Daten. Daher müssen wir bei den Trassenverläufen erstmal davon ausgehen, dass wir sie nicht nutzen dürfen. Also Luftbild, falls die Baustelle sichtbar ist, oder eben mal dran entlang laufen. Wir dürfen nicht einfach alles, was wir im Netz finden, für unsere Datenbank nutzen.

Schönen Sonntag allerseits
g_j_m (2026-03-30 01:48:08+00:00): @silversurfer83
Natürlich korrekt (im Impressum der Seite steht ja auch was zum Copyright/Urheberrecht). Bei 242 km Länge möchte ich aber wissen, wo entlang ich laufen muss ;-))
Misuki (2026-03-19 11:07:26+00:00): I added some extra nodes to the sidewalk so I can later specify the surfaces properly.
HantDX (2026-03-19 12:34:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1490512773#map=19/53.909422/27.587056
Насколько знаю, если highway=crossing, crossing=* уже имеется как точка, то не надо ещё мапить crossing=* на том же highway=footway, footway=crossing.
demon_box (2026-03-19 19:57:04+00:00): Ciao pientielsiu Benvenuto in OSM! Ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti un edificio può avere più entrate e quindi più numeri civici. 
Quindi hai 2 opzioni: 
1. Se conosci esattamente la posizione (entrata) del civico che stai mappando metti tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su un nodo del perimetro dell'edificio (aggiungendo anche il tag entrance sullo stesso nodo);
2. Se invece non hai questa informazione così precisa devi mettere tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su nodo adiacente ma STACCATO dal poligono dell'edificio.
Infine se decidi di mappare il civico l'indirizzo va taggato completo, cioè:

addr:street
addr:housenumber
addr:city
addr:postcode

Ho già proceduto con le correzioni del caso. Grazie e BuonMapping!
NeisBot (2026-03-19 11:21:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/113754926 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Débouchage wc égouts"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : « Débouchage wc égouts »
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
RaphaelPasloin (2026-03-20 07:12:14+00:00): Reverted ! second times you try to seo spam OSM ! this time we checked and there is no legal registred company here.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180144168
jayaddison (2026-03-20 12:20:42+00:00): NB: the circular area in the middle of Gardner's Crescent Gardens, and also the feature along the west side of the garden, are both flowerbeds, not hedges, I think.  I'll go to check that soon.  Ref: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1391609216
jayaddison (2026-03-20 14:51:57+00:00): Nope, my mistake: both the circular area and west side feature are indeed hedge-like.  Even so, I'd suggest considering natural=shrubbery with shrubbery:density=medium - it's up to you.
Zaneo (2026-03-27 17:10:45+00:00): Added shrubbery tags
literan (2026-03-19 19:16:27+00:00): и зачем тут надпись "дом"? откачу
Lostmonkey (2026-03-24 20:17:49+00:00): Hej. Jeg har ændret nogle af dine ladestationer til ladestandere. Sagen er, at en ladestation (amenity=charging_station) består af én eller flere ladestandere (man_made=charge_point). Er der kun én ladestander på lokaliteten, kan denne nok godt blot tilføjes som en ladestation, men er der flere ladestandere (fra samme operatør) i samme afgrænsede område, skal de ikke hver især tilføjes som ladestationer. Det er ladestandere, som skal samles under én ladestation (område eller punkt).
NeisBot (2026-03-19 11:56:13+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 366 of your last 429 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=22628902
Yuri Melnik (2026-03-21 18:37:07+00:00): Hi, thank you for review.

At this street they changed the roundabout to u-turns traffic lights and moved the pedestrian crossing to new traffic light as well
Antonino_Faro (2026-03-19 17:24:12+00:00): Hai intersecato gli edifici
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180104541
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 04:22:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180104596
rajdhani (2026-03-23 06:33:36+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180285639
whitepanda (2026-03-26 09:19:04+00:00): Reverted in changeset ID: 180389851
wolfbert (2026-05-15 06:40:30+00:00): Hallo, das Multipolygon bei 9-11 hat Probleme: innerer Ring liegt außen und area ist unnötig.

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=15.61773&lat=48.09663&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.63&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Persönlich halte ich das Mappen innerhalb von Privatgrundstücken für übertrieben, auch wenns schön gemacht ist. Praktisch jedes Privathaus hat eine Garage, Garten und Tor. Ist natürlich Ansichtssache. 

Aber wenn auf diesem Niveau, dann sollten auch die Zäune / Hecken dazu, damit das Ganze Struktur bekommt. Letztlich auch die öffentlichen Gehwege. Richtig viel Arbeit...
wolfbert (2026-05-15 06:42:24+00:00): Korrektur: statt Garage sollte es Zufahrt heißen.
icestormy (2026-05-15 09:02:21+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, habs angepasst.

Das mit dem Detailgrad ist natürlich richtig, dass das sehr viel Arbeit wäre alles so detailiert zu machen, machmal nimmt es mich einfach mit :-)
wolfbert (2026-05-15 12:39:22+00:00): Kenne ich ;-) Habeauch meine Micro-mapping-Anfälle...
dcapillae (2026-03-19 12:34:00+00:00): Por favor, lea los comentarios: no use «wikidata» ni «wikipedia» par a las marcas; use «brand:wikidata» y «brand:wikipedia».

Las descripciones promocionales se eliminarán. No use descripciones promocionales: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description#No_advertising.

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
007Transformer (2026-03-19 12:20:32+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180105742
iandees (2026-03-19 13:38:52+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3704900872 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180109081, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
eggie (2026-03-19 14:16:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  De toren staat al als uitkijktoren gemapt op de kaart. De dubbele toevoeging verwijderd.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
gurglypipe (2026-03-19 12:39:01+00:00): The erroneous armchair mapping was also in changeset 177558392.
muralito (2026-03-19 14:22:41+00:00): Hola. Asi como los dibujaste saltan las herramientas de QA, o sea no esta bien y no lo van a mostrar como se pretende las herramientas que muestran edificios en 3D. Te va a convenir leer https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings
NeisBot (2026-03-19 12:57:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1416736837 v2 | 8 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180107164
iandees (2026-03-19 13:39:00+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13018957557 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180109086, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
5m4u9 (2026-03-20 02:57:48+00:00): Hola, en una anterior edición dijiste que hay dos escuelas en el mismo terreno. adela zamudio y prada

como son 2 escuelas en un mismo espacio es mejor dejar el área total sin nombre y cada punto con cada nombre.

busqué en el sistema SIE del ministerio y corregí los nombres. gracias por seguir contribuyendo.
iandees (2026-03-19 13:39:05+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8343422593 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180109093, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
BáthoryPéter (2026-04-12 07:57:45+00:00): Szia Fegyi! A teszt sikerült, ha arra voltál kíváncsi, hogy hány nap alatt vesszük észre, akkor a válasz 24.

Büntetésből most a környékeden 100 házat kell megigazítanod a friss ropogós Mapbox ortofotó alapján ;-)
gpadanyig (2026-04-12 08:24:56+00:00): :D :D :D
Andrea Musuruane (2026-03-19 14:25:57+00:00): Ciao. Faccio fatica a capire il senso di queste modifiche. Mi puoi dire cosa volevi fare? Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180107941
NeisBot (2026-03-19 13:30:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/890177784 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Vehicle repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-27 17:33:07+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180514370
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-03-19 13:34:02+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13507175180 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto body shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-19 17:34:04+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-06 07:29:30+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185179833
iandees (2026-03-19 13:39:05+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1301041958 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180109096, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
rodolfovargas (2026-03-19 13:39:17+00:00): Buenos aportes. Entre imágenes de satélite Bing Maps y ESRI hay diferencia espacial y temporal. Esto no le resta precisión a la digitalización. Continua aportando.
MappingMore (2026-03-20 08:51:53+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180147692
AwFi (2026-03-30 08:38:21+00:00): Ciao,
ho visto che hai modificato molte relazioni e le hai portate da type=railway a type=train, perchè? tali relazioni rappresentano una ferrovia e come tale dovrebbe essere type=railway. le relazioni treno sono type train, sia esso specifico o forma aggregata di treni aventi stessa origine,destinazione e fermate.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railways#Routes
Inoltre trovo scorretto l'utilizzo del tag network=RFI, il tag network viene usato per indicare comunità tariffarie o associazioni di trasporto, c'è una discussione a riguardo: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/utilizzo-di-network-in-stazioni-linee-e-relazioni-ferroviarie/142634

Inoltre l'utilizzo del tag RFI è deprecato, sostituito in favore di Rete Ferroviaria Italiana + *:short=RFI : https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rete-ferroviaria-italiana-differenze-di-nome-osm-wikidata-e-nome-ufficiale/140123/

Buon mapping!
SomeoneElse (2026-03-22 19:38:59+00:00): Ahem: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/143 ("Hay dualidades" I think).
Davileci (2026-03-23 00:02:58+00:00): https://registroentidadeslocales.mpt.es/REL/frontend/inicio/municipios/2/13394/25
Davileci (2026-03-23 00:03:10+00:00): https://registroentidadeslocales.mpt.es/REL/frontend/inicio/municipios/2/13394/25
SomeoneElse (2026-03-26 13:14:53+00:00): @Davileci How is that relevant, and how does it negate the signage visible at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/143 ?
Davileci (2026-03-26 13:59:41+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dudas-varias-sobre-la-toponimia-en-las-regiones-de-espana-y-dibujo-del-mapa/121272/20
Davileci (2026-03-26 16:42:57+00:00): What is the name of the village: the two given by the autonomous community or the one given by the village itself recognised by the State? Look at the streets signs and you will see none or few catalan names.
InsertUser (2026-03-25 10:18:24+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
TinPetreković (2026-03-25 11:59:30+00:00): Unnecessary restrictions were removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180404090
iandees (2026-03-19 14:46:17+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/747675738 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180114353, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
MappingMore (2026-03-20 08:08:18+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180145840
eggie (2026-03-19 14:24:58+00:00): fixed no tag node
woodpeck (2026-03-19 14:37:28+00:00): Hi there Lishhgoyo, when I look at the aerial imagery, I don't see the regular building shapes that you have drawn here. In fact in many areas where you have drawn a building I see trees, and frequently when there are buildings, they look much smaller in footprint than what you have drawn, or sometimes the actual buildings covers the area of two of "your" buildings. Can you explain what happened here?
Lishhgoyo (2026-03-22 12:08:02+00:00): Hello woodpeck! The aerial imagery here seems a bit outdated, so I also relied on local knowledge since I’m quite familiar with the area. What I mapped was actually the plot/house boundary layout planned by the NOIDA authority, not the exact building footprints, as the plots are structured that way in this region. That said, I understand OSM usually expects actual building outlines, so I relize i have misinterpreted, I'm currently in the process of mapping this particular sector and will correct them accordingly. I’ll also re-check the areas where sizes or overlaps seem off. I’m still relatively new to mapping, so I’d really appreciate any guidance on best practices. Thanks again!
Frans S (2026-04-08 15:12:22+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping.
You mapped rectangular buildings as a round building (the whole yard).
Please map more accurated.
Best regards
eggie (2026-03-19 15:11:51+00:00): Dag Vervoordeldonk,

Beter eenduidig taggen. Dus de huisarts op de adresnode met dr juiste tags.
Wanneer het gebouw Pastorie heet kan dat op de gebouwomtrek blijven.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2026-03-19 15:19:10+00:00): Op de adresnode amenity=doctors bijtagen. Evt website phone e.d toevoegen
eggie (2026-03-19 15:35:38+00:00): Als bovenstaand aangepast
Hendrik Helsper (2026-03-25 20:21:55+00:00): Why did you replace "place_of_worship"? 
This locality is used for church service. I explicitly wrote that in the note-Tag
ricjanssens (2026-03-25 21:48:29+00:00): Sorry about that!
PeeWee32 (2026-06-30 04:33:47+00:00): Even een opmerking over het kijkscherm. Ik zag deze in mijn lijst van vogelkijkhutten maar heb sterk mijn twijfels of dit wel klopt. Een leisure=bird_hide met de name" Wild kijkscherm"  is zeer waarschijnlijk een leisure=wildlife_hide . De name lijkt ook geen echte name maar een beschrijving. Mocht het wel een naam hebben dan kun je em toevoegen en anders graag verwijderen.  Laat maar weten of mijn veronderstelling klopt. Groet Peter
Hnsptrs (2026-06-30 06:40:46+00:00): aangepast..
dank voor de correctie
gr.
Hans
Hnsptrs (2026-06-30 09:07:14+00:00): Wel jammer dat nu op de kaart geen aanduiding meer zichtbaar is.
Kan dit anders?
PeeWee32 (2026-07-01 05:55:51+00:00): Ik zie dat er veel nog een tourism = viewpoint hebben toegevoegd. Dat rendert wel
Hnsptrs (2026-07-01 06:21:19+00:00): beter...

bedankt
iandees (2026-03-19 14:59:50+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2609922221, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5416821180 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180115427, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
MassCartog (2026-03-19 16:17:03+00:00): Hi Mike Glover, please don't remove roads in areas behind gates, these are valid features if they still exist. "Restricted and gated area" is not a valid reason to remove them from OSM. Please use OSM access tags instead, thanks.
9_tab (2026-04-11 19:04:55+00:00): On ne le trouve plus en Suisse. Pourquoi ces modifications?
imagoiq (2026-04-12 09:56:25+00:00): Bonjour,

Quand vous dites, on ne le trouve plus en Suisse, est-ce que vous parlez de Nominatim ?
J'ai fait ces changements, car j'ai constaté que cela posait problème si je faisais une requête de type area sur overpass avec la région frontalière suisse et en voulant récupérer tous les adresses contenues dans cette région. Il n'est pas possible de savoir quelle adresse correspondant à la région avec le système que vous avez utilisé "addr, et addr2". En déplaçant les adresses dans chacune des frontières (ce qui semble également correspondre avec les différentes entrées), cela résout ce problème. Cela dit ce n'est peut-être pas la bonne approche. Il faudrait peut-être demander à Sarah Hoffmann ce qu'elle en pense et si le cas peut être résolu dans Nominatim.
imagoiq (2026-04-12 10:43:40+00:00): Sur CoMaps, la recherche "arbez" donne deux fois l'hôtel. Une fois en Suisse, une fois en France.
9_tab (2026-04-13 10:07:36+00:00): Moins sur Nominatim et OsmAnd (au moins au début). CoMaps: est-ce avant ou après vos modifications ? C'est un cas un peu particulier, donc qu'il n'ait pas beaucoup d'autres avec les mêmes tags n'est pas étonnant et ce n'est pas un problème en soi. Les hôtels ont l'adresse (aussi) sur le "feature" principal. Nous devrions probablement utiliser https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:full en plus d' addr2 . Peut‑être que l'hôtel sera mieux reconnu en inversant addr et addr2. Les entrées existaient déjà auparavant. Je pense qu'il est préférable de les nommer.