piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Taya_S (2023-06-20 18:43:24+00:00): I updated the coastline, the tidalflats and also added some saltmarsh and wet meadow/pasture areas further up stream. I also untangled the boundaries from River Kent in this area. 

I tagged the area's that seem to be transitioning from Tidalflat to saltmarsh as Saltmarsh already under the presumption that they will continue to develop. 

Feel free to edit any things you dont agree with, as you're more familiar with the area. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137575294

Sincerely,
Taya
gurglypipe (2023-06-20 22:41:43+00:00): That’s fantastic, thank you for taking the time to do that, it’s a big improvement on the state I left it in!
Frans S (2023-06-14 13:55:55+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings do not meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
Minor issues
E. Buildings not squared.
G: include the shadow of a building in the mapping.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137329846
Gegenwind84 (2024-08-11 11:21:46+00:00): Hi, what is that? A removed tourist information point does not have any informational value. Can we delete this node?
AngocA (2023-06-20 03:57:46+00:00): Hola. Gracias por haber comenzado a contribuir en OpenStreetMap.
No entiendo esta edición, me puedes explicar mejor qué agregaste al mapa?
El nombre del objeto no es el más adecuado, y se borraría ya que no es correcto. Me podrías dar más detalles.
Entre todos buscamos tener un buen mapa, por lo que su contenido debe ser el mejor.
StefanHRT (2023-06-14 14:24:04+00:00): Hi,
Du kannst surface gerne noch auf sett ändern. wurde erst kürzlich alles neu verlegt, smoothness ist wie die Zufahrt. (arbeite in dem Gebäude). VG
Weasel-Wiesel (2023-06-14 20:51:14+00:00): Angepasst (Änderungssatz 137344979)
Taya_S (2023-06-17 08:09:33+00:00): Hallo Martin,

Je vraagt om review.

Ik heb de nodes die vast zaten aan de boundary los gemaakt. Ik heb ook de geometrie iets verbeterd waar ik het pad door de bomen kon zien. Tot slot heb ik dit pad los gemaakt van het Oude Tolpoort en met het andere pad verbonden. 

Groeten,
Taya
MxxCon (2023-06-25 23:17:34+00:00): Hello.
Shouldn't this be cuisine=mexican, and therefore tacos=yes as an additional tag to more explicitly indicate what kind of Mexican food?
Even if not, according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine values should be singular, not plural, so "taco".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137330473
lipuma (2023-06-30 08:58:46+00:00): Oh, I just saw someone added the tag `tacos=yes' to this POI and I changed it to `cuisine=tacos', which I found on the OSM Wiki.

`cuisine=tacos' has over 500 uses, `cuisine=taco' has a little over 50 I think...

I see you added `cuisine=mexican' initally. I'll add it back to this node again.
Frans S (2024-08-12 14:30:10+00:00): retagged residential areas into building=yes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137330486
Frans S (2023-06-15 07:53:31+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
However, a few remarks.
Please check this wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
how to tag roads in this area. When they give access to buildings, neighborhoods etc., Unclassified (rural area) is the most common tag applicable to the present situation 
Check the description on the Track.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137330701
Frans S (2024-08-12 14:28:23+00:00): retagged residential areas into building=yes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137330715
mueschel (2023-06-17 10:09:41+00:00): Please improve your QA procedures. I fix errors made by Grab employees almost every day. At least pay attention to warnings and errors shown by the JOSM validator!
Colbertson (2023-06-14 17:52:22+00:00): living_street ir dzīvojamā iela ar ierobežojumu 20km/h un zīmi nr. 533, šī drīzāk varētu but parasta residential.
https://likumi.lv/wwwraksti/2015/121/BILDES/N_279/IMAGE196.JPG
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dresidential
bxl-forever (2023-06-14 19:21:25+00:00): Hello,

This object is a bit weird:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15978161

You created an invalid multipolygon with two adjacent outer areas, and gave it a dual tagging that says: "This is both a social facility AND a car park."

The problem is that nothing will be rendered or searched properly.

I suggest you examine this again.  Make it two contiguous areas, one for the car park and one for the woonzorgcentrum.

Hope this helps.
Frans S (2024-08-12 14:27:26+00:00): retagged residential areas into building=yes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137332035
Frans S (2024-08-12 14:27:03+00:00): retagged residential areas into building=yes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137332105
Glassman (2023-06-17 17:15:34+00:00): #TIP: street names are spelled out in OSM. Reason - software has a hard time unabbreviating.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137332263
Frans S (2024-08-12 14:26:09+00:00): retagged residential areas into building=yes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137332374
Frans S (2024-08-12 14:25:40+00:00): retagged residential areas into building=yes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137332451
Andrea Musuruane (2023-06-15 10:20:18+00:00): Ciao. Usa delle immagini satellitari per posizionare i numeri civici. Qui risultano lontani dalla strada e sullo stesso lato compare sia la numerazione pari che quella dispari (oltre ad aver avuto il nome della via errato, che ho corretto). Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137332515
mikki65 (2023-06-15 14:53:20+00:00): Queste le ho fatte ieri  ed la connessione non funzionava come i telefoni  ora li sposto  ma usando stretcomplete e posizionandomi accanto il numero  magari sono le strade non allineate non so
AlfredoSP (2024-04-25 15:14:09+00:00): Ciao Marco, sono Alfredo, ho risistemato il 573C che dopo delle modifiche apparentemente c'erano relazioni doppie e confuse
Frans S (2024-08-12 14:24:55+00:00): retagged residential areas into building=yes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137332712
Elyanard (2023-07-04 05:51:18+00:00): Halo, w_djatmiko.
Terimakasih atas kontribusinya untuk OSM.
Kami dari POI sedang mengerjakan perbaikan toponimi di daerah Jawa Tengah menggunakan Maproullete   https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/39454

Saya ada sedikit kesulitan pada kordinat -6.9931157, 110.1473593
dimana pada data BIG yang kami punya titik tersebut merupakan Desa Puguh sedangkan menurut data OSM desa tersebut bernama Desa Tegal. Apakah Anda bisa membantu kami melakukan cross check di titik ini dan memberi tahu kami data mana yang lebih sesuai?

Terima kasih.
w_djatmiko (2023-07-04 07:27:19+00:00): Desa Tegal om
Sumber, shp BIG (ibukota desa)
aixbrick (2023-06-16 08:25:03+00:00): Hallo,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182043744: layer=-1 ist unnötig, da bereits die Brücke mit layer=1 getaggt ist.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182043731: Hier ist auch ein Teil des Weges außerhalb der Brücke mit layer=1 getaggt.
Ferner ist nicht nachvollziehbar, warum die Wege auf der Brücke aus mehreren einzelnen Abschnitten bestehen, das Tagging aber gleich ist.
Gruß
tyomox (2023-06-21 06:49:56+00:00): layers korrigiert und Brückenabschnitte zusammengefasst
AntMadeira (2023-06-14 19:25:54+00:00): Só para informar que esta alteração nas permissões de acesso não foi a mais correta. O portão já estava com acesso reservado, o que implica que o acesso à estrada já não era permitido a todos. Ainda assim, colocar "access=no" na estrada significa que ninguém tem acesso, o que não é verdade. Alterei para "access=permit", uma vez que só quem tem permissão (empregados, serviços, etc) é que pode aceder à área de serviço por esta estrada. Penso que assim fica mais correto.

Qualquer dúvida, estou ao dispor.

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137332867
Frans S (2024-08-12 14:24:28+00:00): retagged residential areas into building=yes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137332876
JAAS (2023-10-16 22:45:12+00:00): Estimado ossach:

Escribo esto con unos comentarios al respecto de esta zona agregada por usted: 
- al haber agregado `maxspeed:conditional=*` a una vía, esto implica que solamente durante esos días y en esos horarios específicos se aplican. 

El horario que debe ser utilizado en formato de 24 horas (00:00-24:00) y obviamente no reconoce la hora ingresada actualmente cómo `31:00`. Si se trata de una restricción permanente en efecto siempre, no hace falta agregarle el `conditional` que implica que funciona solo durante los determinados horarios descritos.

Y por último, si esta restricción de velocidad es aplicable a ambos sentidos de la vía, no hace falta agregar los `forward` y `backward`(a menos que solo cambie esta restricción para uno de los dos sentidos y el otro difiera - algo que valdría la pena hacer notar, de ser así). 

Si me explica bien qué es lo que sucede en esa zona y qué era lo que trataba de ingresar, con mucho gusto puedo apoyarle con la sintaxis requerida para que sea funcional y interpretable por los navegadores para crear las rutas.

Atentamente,
JAAS - Jorge Aguirre
JAAS (2023-11-06 15:32:58+00:00): Estimado ossach:

Sigo a la espera de sus comentarios respecto a los límites de velocidad, condicionados a los sentidos/días/horas que agregó usted a estas calles en este sector.

Como le explicaba previamente, 'las reglas' como quedaron redactadas no hacen sentido alguno, ni conozco esa area como para tener un criterio bien fundamentado. Nuevamente le ofrezco ayudarle a expresar lo que refleje las características reales propias del lugar, solo necesito comprender previamente cuáles son las condiciones que se encuentran ahí mismo.

Saludos cordiales,
JAAS - Jorge Aguirre
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-06-14 15:14:06+00:00): I don't think it's correct to change access from private to no. I'm sure some botanical garden workers have access there.
ristik (2023-06-14 15:25:39+00:00): The justification is that in nordic countries it is OK to walk and cycle on private land, and to stay for up to one night. But if access is NO then it is no, unless someone has a key/permit. Also, this is not literally private property, more like a municipal facility.

Practically, I'd like to stop Garmin toys and brouter.de to stop routing my bike rides through the garden. The gate in question is very much closed and enforced with barbed wire.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-06-14 15:33:06+00:00): access=private has no relation to land ownership or "Freedom to roam"

Please consult the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-06-14 15:34:53+00:00): brouter does not route through private ways/nodes.
Frans S (2024-08-12 14:22:06+00:00): retagged residential areas into building=yes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137333008
Frans S (2024-08-12 14:20:38+00:00): retagged residential areas into building=yes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137333299
Frans S (2024-08-12 14:20:16+00:00): retagged residential areas into building=yes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137333545
surveyor54 (2023-06-16 07:07:59+00:00): Hallo S_S,
in OSM sollte man schon etwas sorgfältiger arbeiten. Sich selbst überschneidende Linien sollte man vermeiden, sie  werden von den QS-Tools angemeckert. Auch bekommen Nebengebäude und Parkplätze keine Hausnummern. Gebäude sind auch einigermaßen rechtwinklig. 

Hier ein Link:  https://ibb.co/v4vhqVL

Das muss nun irgendjemand nacharbeiten.


Für solche Eintragungen eignet sich GoMap nur bedingt. Hier sollte man schon einen richtigen Editor benutzen.

Gruß
surveyor54
S_S (2023-06-16 07:42:14+00:00): Hallo surveyor54,
danke für die Hinweise. Welchen Editor kannst du empfehlen? Das mit den Hausnummern wusste ich nicht. 
Ich bin für Hinweise dankbar um mich zu verbessern. Oder sind hier nur bezahlte Profis an Werk? Das würde die mangelnde Detailtiefe erklären. Die meisten Häuser sind einfach als Quadrat auf dem Grundstück erfasst. 
Ich versuche mich zu verbessern und freue mich auf den Erfassungstoolvorschlag. 
Gruß S_S
ljc_jlyb (2023-06-21 07:25:47+00:00): What is the Chinese name for it?
bjdayutong (2023-06-23 16:40:14+00:00): Hello, the name of the expressway is 克承高速/经乌高速. The actual status is uncertain, but on the Dutch website https://www.wegenwiki.nl/Kecheng_Expressway it is said to be open. I had to give up mapping because I found that I am still uncapable for mapping such a long road. Details can be found on Baidu maps.
ivanbranco (2023-06-16 18:28:51+00:00): Ciao Mirko,

per favore non ignorare gli errori di iD. Qua l'editor ha provato ad avvisarti che avevi trascinato un nodo ma lo hai ignorato (vedi: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/2493850315)

Ho sistemato io, buon proseguimento e buon mapping
Frans S (2024-08-12 14:18:56+00:00): retagged residential areas into building=yes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137333722
Frans S (2024-08-12 14:16:49+00:00): retagged residential areas into building=yes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137333840
MarcoR (2023-06-15 07:14:56+00:00): Ciao!
foot=no indica che è proibito l'accesso/il transito ai pedoni e di solito tale divieto è segnalato con dei cartelli (vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Afoot%3Dno ).

Buon mapping,
Marco.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137333852
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-14 15:36:54+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 136960537, 136960796, 136960853, 136961190, 136961320, 136962750, 136982094, 136983730, 137012408, 137332884, 137332983.
Frans S (2024-08-12 14:16:26+00:00): retagged residential areas into building=yes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137333982
Frans S (2024-08-03 12:43:49+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping.

E: Buildings not squared.

G: Included the shadow of the building .


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137334337
Frans S (2024-08-12 14:16:57+00:00): retagged residential areas into building=yes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137334351
lipuma (2023-06-16 08:50:59+00:00): Hi, I see you added the tag `start date', but this Lidl already had a `start_date' tag. Which date is correct?
Đuro Jiří (2023-06-16 13:35:33+00:00): Přidal jsem bankomat a jelikož Lidl je v celé budově,tak jsem zkopíroval tento bod

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9134516613/history

a přidal jsem ty podpatky k budově. Na budově jsem opravil i počet podlaží ze dvou na jedno.
Podle této zprávy

https://ceskobudejovicky.denik.cz/zpravy_region/nova-prodejna-lidlu-na-rudolfovske-otevrela-sleva-prilakala-stovky-zakazniku-202.html

,Lidl byl otevřen 30.9.2021
Opraveno,s pozdravem
berndw (2023-06-18 12:46:48+00:00): Die Äste versperren den Zugang zu einem Grundstück etwa 10 Meter Richtung Bergstraße, der Wanderweg ist absolut frei.

Ich werde den Änderungssatz zurück setzen, bitte in Zukunft einen Hinweis setzen und _nicht_ den Weg löschen.

Andere würden hier das böse V-Wort verwenden, ich schaue mir das lieber an.
berndw (2023-06-18 12:54:05+00:00): Achso, der Weg ist nur ein Pfad. war ein uralter Fehler von mir ;-)
JeroenHoek (2023-06-14 18:28:07+00:00): Had die een naam? Je hebt hem  nu (correct) op de node voor vaarnavigatie gezet, maar hij kan dan ook op de brug-outline en op het pad over de brug.

Ik heb ze hier zo toegevoegd:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137340572
jfitie (2023-06-14 18:55:17+00:00): Helemaal goed zo!
BCNorwich (2023-06-14 17:42:24+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Sorry to say you dragged the road out of alignment and changed a building to a landuse area, not to OSM best practice. Thus I've reverted the changeset.

Regards Bernard.
Taya_S (2023-06-15 06:54:03+00:00): Hallo Menno,

Ik heb de oude website ook nog even bijgewerkt. Dit was nog de Van der Luyt website.

Groeten, 
Taya
hayes9 (2023-06-15 21:28:19+00:00): Correction: Source used was Bing aerial imagery
VictorIE (2024-09-06 21:45:11+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182061306

It doesn't look like much of a car park. :)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4422876
b-unicycling (2024-09-07 16:45:30+00:00): yeah, maybe the thing I thought was a car is actually the information sign, because the other locations with information signs there, it looks like there is something of the same shape.
tonalf (2023-08-01 09:50:13+00:00): It looks like the bus 25 route is incorrectly entered: it contains 2 segments way outside of Split and does not show the line passing down Vukovarska street, from Vrh Sucidra to Brnik. I'm not really sure how to edit relations or where the stops are, so I'm leaving it as it is, but it is probably misleading as it is.
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2023-06-15 09:40:41+00:00): Hi, thanks for your changes.

Consider splitting your changesets by country: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets This helps reviewing your changes and keep the map quality.

Also consider writing meaningful changeset comments, for the same reason: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks in advance!
cserpell (2023-06-16 00:57:54+00:00): Hola, por favor tener más cuidado al colocar el nombre de la calle para que calce con el nombre (en este caso quedó con mayúsculas completo), y con los tildes en el nombre "República". Gracias.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137336468
Arnaud Champollion (2023-06-16 09:55:54+00:00): Vrai mais ce n'est pas non plus un gué (ford).
Avec cet attribut-là j'ai bien peur que le routage cycliste / piéton soit limité, or on y passe à l'aise la plupart de l'année.
Et si on mettait bridge=low_water_crossing ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:bridge
Marvk (2026-06-07 19:26:56+00:00): Hi Map-Peter,

nur als Hinweis: Du hast https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23740321 als surface=asphalt gemappt, obwohl diese in der Realität surface=unpaved ist.

Wenn du ohne vor Ort gewesen zu sein surfaces mappst, solltest du dir schon sehr sicher sein, bzw. das Feld leer lassen, denn kein Wert ist hier für Nutzer von Routern hilfreicher als ein eventuell falscher Wert. 

Liebe Grüße
Marv
Taya_S (2023-06-15 07:09:24+00:00): Hallo Rens,

Je vraagt om een review. Alles lijkt me zo goed. 

Groeten,
Taya
lipuma (2023-06-14 20:37:11+00:00): Hoi, heb jij een slimme manier om parkeerplekken te mappen? Ik probeer het soms, maar het voelt altijd alsof het veel sneller en makkelijker kan...

Misschien heb je tips of ken je een filmpje of tutorial?
spughetti (2023-06-14 21:59:18+00:00): Hey fincent,

Er is een JOSM plugin genaamd Gridify die het proces sneller maakt, als je kennis hebt van JOSM stel ik die voor. 

Ik gebruik zelf voornamelijk iD en kopieer en plak alle parkeerplaatsen. Het is niet zo efficient als in JOSM maar ik heb tot nu toe nog niet echt de weg in JOSM kunnen vinden haha.

Je kan de plugin hier vinden
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Gridify
lipuma (2023-06-16 10:55:36+00:00): WOW! Gridify is geweldig, dit gaat zo zo zo veel sneller dan hoe ik het eerst deed haha. Dank je wel!

In het begin deed ik ook alleenmaar iD gebruiken, maar uiteindelijk toch de switch gemaakt naar JOSM en ik zou niet meer terug kunnen naar iD voor veel van mijn edits. Hele simpele dingen of "even snel" edits doe ik nog wel met iD.

Nogmaals bedankt ;-)
cserpell (2023-06-16 01:01:52+00:00): Hola. Agregué el nombre al elemento escuela que rodea este edificio, y saqué el nombre del edificio.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137337449
johnny_1982 (2023-06-28 23:42:07+00:00): Telefon wurde vor 14 Tagen gelöscht, war aber gestern nach vorhanden. Bitte mehr Vorsicht und keine Dinge löschen, die noch existieren.
BaboucheVerte (2023-06-15 04:37:29+00:00): Bonjour Compatie, pourquoi avoir enlevé les attributs name, alt_name, et tourism=wilderness_hut  ? Ce sont bien ces noms et c'est bien une wildernes_hut !
J'imagine que la suppression était une erreur de manip ?
Compatie (2023-06-19 19:31:36+00:00): Effectivement, ou j'avais dû avoir un doute à propos de ces informations. Je viens de corriger ça.
BaboucheVerte (2023-06-20 05:07:12+00:00): ok ! Si tu es intéressé par la thématique plein air, il y a n groupe télégram (https://t.me/osmpleinair) et un portail sur le wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Projet_Plein_Air). Bonne carto !
dcapillae (2023-06-14 18:16:20+00:00): Hola de nuevo.

Gracias por los cambios. He hecho algunas pequeñas correcciones.

Siempre hay que colocar el objeto —una hamburguesería, en este caso— dentro del contorno del edificio donde se encuentre.

El nombre de la calle en la dirección postal debe introducirse completo, incluyendo el tipo de vial tal como aparece en el mapa: «Calle Alfredo Catalani», sin abreviaturas.

El sitio web se debe introducir con el prefijo «https://» donde corresponda.

Por último, he corregido el formato del horario de apertura introducido. Este aspecto suele provocar equívocos incluso entre colaboradores con bastante experiencia. Si necesita ayuda sobre cómo introducir los horarios de apertura en OSM, puede consultar esta página del wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

Gracias por su colaboración.

Seguimos en contacto. Buen trabajo.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla