piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
synfarer (2024-12-18 21:03:58+00:00): Hi sbre! It looks like some of the places you modified just got population=yes instead of an actual number. Specifically Olsrud, Sætran, and Jøa. This is not valid tagging. Do you know the actual values? If not the tags should just be removed.
sbre (2024-12-19 15:35:38+00:00): This is certainly not by intention, I have the actual values (obtained by asking locals) in my notes somewhere.
Curious about how that can happen in JOSM, I probably clicked the wrong buttons somewhere.

Probably not going to do any editing before newyears.
synfarer (2024-12-22 22:36:11+00:00): Aha, honest mistake! You won't have been the first person to misclick somewhere in JOSM, and you won't be the last ;) 

Super that you have the numbers! Just update it when you have the time. God jul!
gscholz (2024-05-13 06:39:15+00:00): Hi RCA7HEAD,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-62.16247&lat=-38.67504&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151189355

Especially way 1281964693 is affected here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1281964693

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2024-05-15 10:43:36+00:00): Hi RCA7HEAD, 
due to your missing response I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
DressyPear4 (2024-05-11 23:21:02+00:00): Não crie ninhos pokemon
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151189579
map per (2024-05-13 17:35:27+00:00): Hallo Garmin765T,

wegen review_requested:

Für Baustellen die nur kurzzeitig bestehen (kürzer als drei bis sechs Monate) ist es besser conditional restrictions (1) zu verwenden.

Hier wäre das dann z.B. "conditional:access = no @ (2024 May 11 - 2024 May 26)"

(Im ID editor ist das etwas versteckt und man muss unter "Bearbeite Objekt" erst noch "Eigenschaften" ausklappen, um die conditional restriction in die Tabelle einfügen zu können.)

Viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Conditional_restrictions
Garmin765T (2024-05-13 20:47:27+00:00): Vielen Dank! Habe die Änderung entsprechend vorgenommen. VG
Sandal man (2024-05-13 09:39:09+00:00): Hola, gracias por tu contribución a OSM, pero olvidaste nombrar el camino aquí.
Tampoco está "bien" conectado con las carreteras adyacentes.
¿Te gustaría ver esto de nuevo?
Saludos Sandalman
mavl (2024-11-13 07:56:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159079151 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
JeroenHoek (2024-05-11 15:15:50+00:00): Hij is op de grond gewoon gemarkeerd bij de twee punten.
dvdhoven (2024-05-11 16:09:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151193254#map=10/53.1079/5.8842
eggie (2024-05-11 15:34:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Je hebt hier een adresnode Marnixstraat 386 ergens anders heen verplaatst.
Verder kun je geen routerelaties bewerken met editor iD  Die maakt routes stuk. Tram 2 is niet meer in orde. Het kan alleen met editor JOSM en de nodige ervaring
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047 

MVG, 
Wat was je bedoeling?
Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-05-11 15:38:20+00:00): Adresnode teruggezet.
eggie (2024-05-11 15:38:44+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151190705
Leo Slager (2024-05-11 20:18:50+00:00): @ Javerius,
Dat was een goede poging om de omleidingsroute voor tram 2 voor de komende maanden vast te leggen in OSM.
Helaas gaat dat altijd fout: De editor iD waar je mee werkt zal alle nieuwe sporen en haltes achter aan vastplakken in de routerelatie. Er blijft dus altijd een onderbroken route achter omdat de rails en haltes niet in de juiste volgorde staan.
Wil je serieus en vaker de routerelaties bewerken, dan ben je van harte welkom in de OSM community, maar dan zul je wel gebruik moeten gaan maken van de editor JOSM. Die beschikt over een speciaal bewerkingsvenster en dan kun je alle sporen en haltes in de juiste volgorde zetten.
Ik zal de routerelatie weer repareren.
Wil je (met OSM) ook de route in de andere richting aanpassen ?
Laat me dat even weten, dan kan ik je daarbij helpen.
Leo Slager (2024-05-13 14:55:39+00:00): Geen reactie ontvangen.
Route in de tegenrichting heb ik ook aangepast.
DressyPear4 (2024-05-11 23:19:04+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151191183
rab (2024-05-11 18:09:11+00:00): Wouldn't it make more sense to remove most of these roads?
TeBaMa (2024-05-12 08:41:11+00:00): Maybe, but I don't like to remove work of previous mappers.
NeisBot (2024-05-11 15:40:14+00:00): Hi Samuel Mathieson, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1281980682

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
Samuel Mathieson (2024-05-11 15:43:24+00:00): Hello,

It is my own terrain that is on the beach. It is right next to the beach itself.
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-12 04:44:40+00:00): Hi Samuel,

I can see there is a feature that would be a beach near here, but the area you have mapped is not a beach. Please let me know if you would like some help mapping it.

Please also be aware that we should keep private ownership details off OSM.
Samuel Mathieson (2024-05-12 15:00:14+00:00): Ok, understood, thanks for the guidance.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-12 15:16:49+00:00): Thanks for your answer Samuel Mathieson.

#HappyMapping

Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151209137
Patrickov (2024-05-11 15:53:02+00:00): This change focuses on Lai King Hill Road.  Ways within Lai King Estate will be rectified in future changesets.
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-17 01:12:33+00:00): Thank you for mapping, the mapping looks good with great changeset comments. In addition, the additional discussion has provided more insights. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151192432
martinst (2024-05-12 13:59:05+00:00): Hallo, wieso hast Du den Pfad verkürzt?
martinst (2024-05-16 04:29:51+00:00): Der Pfad ist auf voller Länge vorhanden.
Revertiert mit Changeset 151388386.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-11 16:00:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11897085177

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-11 16:10:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Wakacyjna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11896967361

"Chełmońskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11896967366
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11896967367

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
akimapbuilder (2024-05-13 06:44:04+00:00): You draw building over backyard, try to avoid that. Thanks
eisa01 (2024-05-11 20:39:01+00:00): Takk for at du oppdaterte kartet!

Av en eller annen grunn ble det lagt til anonyme notat om Hjemmebane og McDonalds: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4241044

I tillegg så inkl. vi ikke adresseinfo i Norge, så fjernet det fra Hjemmebane
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-11 16:20:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Aleja Brzozowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11897112905
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/828130434

"Aleja Akacjowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11897112906

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
tekim (2024-05-12 01:04:10+00:00): reverting an edit that added a fake beach - no evidence of sand or other loose surface here, and in fact there is quite a bit of vegetation.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151206774
00Hein (2024-06-03 01:21:26+00:00): Hi there — where did you get the Spy Hill track from? I pass by the Bill Williams Trail junction quite frequently and as far as I can tell this trail has been closed/removed with logs etc.
Dolphinholmer (2024-06-03 22:53:29+00:00): Hi! I walked some way up this track from Bill Williams a few weeks ago, but admittedly not the whole way up to the Eldridge Grade Fire Road - I turned around and came back. I checked the path on Lidar and strava to see if people were still using it, which seemed to confirm they were. If you know better please edit to reflect your knowledge!
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-17 01:14:31+00:00): Thank you for updating as mentioned in the previous changeset 151192432. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151194186
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-11 16:40:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454629156

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
infeeeee (2024-05-12 10:25:40+00:00): Szia!

Ha a helyére raktad, akkor a fixme-t törölheted róla.

További jó térképezést!
zolikonta (2024-05-12 10:33:15+00:00): Hello. Rendben, köszi.
user_8655426 (2024-05-12 01:05:36+00:00): こんにちは。OpenStreetMap へようこそ。
OpenStreetMap は現在、実際に存在する地物をマッピングするプロジェクトです。(real and current) 架空の地物を追加したり、既存のデータを実際とは異なるものに変更したりしないでください。よろしくお願いします。(事実と異なる不正な編集を行ったユーザーは、ブロックされる可能性があります。)

・「ようこそ！」
https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome

・JA:破壊行為
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:破壊行為

・新規マッパーに、コミュニティメンバーからお願いしたいこと
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2018/06/12/tips-pokemon-go-2/?lang=ja

---

・JA:初心者ガイド
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:初心者ガイド

・learnOSM (ビギナーズガイド)
https://learnosm.org/ja/beginner/

---

・JA:Map Features (地物)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Map_Features

・JA:Tag:natural=coastline (海岸線)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:natural%3Dcoastline
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151194767
user_8655426 (2024-05-12 01:14:20+00:00): Reverted. (vandalism)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151206833
Banana321 (2024-05-12 12:06:12+00:00): Fak
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-12 00:51:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM!  Your first changeset looks great!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151195344
Glassman (2024-05-11 23:47:38+00:00): Are these actually marked as private, ie no trespassing or just privately owned? If so, use ownership=private, or if the roads are limited to customers or employees then access=destination may be appropriate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151195385
ryanarrr (2024-05-15 20:48:45+00:00): Hi Glassman, thanks for the comment. They're all road segments within privately owned parcels confirmed with King County's Parcel Viewer application. Previously as marked they were showing up in platforms like Wandrer.earth to be transited on foot and in a number of cases there are "private property" and/or "no trespassing" signs but it is implied for most private property.  The Wandrer filtering rules for foot paths can be found here but the one being primarily triggered with my changes is "access=private" https://wandrer.earth/scoring.  This pattern can be seen in prior segments up and down Medina, WA for private access roads there as well.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151195385
Yuuria (2024-05-12 08:55:30+00:00): TODO - Fix incorrect import.
Quaternion (2024-05-17 22:13:28+00:00): Korrektur siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151473245

Falls auf der kreisförmigen Straßenkreuzung eine Fahrtrichtung vorgegeben ist, bitte noch oneway=yes ergänzen.

Erklärung im Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Dcircular
Quaternion (2024-05-17 21:22:22+00:00): Die "disconnected_way:highway" Warnung kann ich ebenfalls nicht nachvollziehen.
ooosssay (2024-05-11 17:26:35+00:00): Meant to be building
Jakka (2024-06-24 10:56:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8066722782
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dinsect_hotel
NeisBot (2024-05-11 17:55:14+00:00): Hi Valleys777, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/node/11897206316
https://osm.org/node/11897206317

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-12 11:12:02+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151197649
MARTIN Rakotomamonjy (2024-05-11 19:44:55+00:00): merci beaucoup pour les corrections
VLD549 (2024-05-22 15:03:25+00:00): Hi, the name change from apotheek to Apotheek is obviously correct. However, I noticed that the site mentions the address to be Bierbeekstraat 2. On the map it seems to be differently placed.
Is this something you can check? (I can't I think)

Thank you!
queerthoughts (2024-05-24 16:23:16+00:00): Hiya,

I went to check today, looks like it has moved recently, as the signage is still present on the old building. However it's operational in the new building. It's worth noting that this is actually Bierbeekstraat 2B, not 2 (confirmed by housenumber on site and GRB), so their site is wrong.

I've moved it on OSM: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11931123634.

Cheers,

Luna
VLD549 (2024-06-25 12:30:32+00:00): Thank you for the answer, much appreciated.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-11 18:10:24+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013902363

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
tekim (2024-05-12 00:58:46+00:00): thanks for helping to clean up fake beaches!
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-12 11:14:19+00:00): @tekim :)

Valleys777 created the beaches.

After commenting the changeset, the beaches has been removed. See https://osm.org/changeset/151196977
mavl (2024-11-13 07:56:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159079151 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
Layft Greater (2025-04-12 09:18:24+00:00): Is it still under construction?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1282004683
Sigurdblueface (2025-04-12 16:40:19+00:00): Should have been completed I guess
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-15 08:45:56+00:00): This changeset changed boundaries to highways
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151197863
Komadinovic Vanja (2024-05-22 16:55:59+00:00): Hej hej, sredjujem dataset za staze.pss.rs pa sam naleteo da se ova staza razlikuje od gpx traga koji ima PSS. Samo da proverim sa tobom da li se secas da li ovde gde je izmena postoje planinarske markacije koje prate izmenjen put, drugim recima da li je planinarske markacije idu crvenom linijom?

https://vanjakom.github.io/osm-pss-integration/dataset/staze-pss-rs-diff/3-22-5.html#map=18/20.006878674030308/44.11399239511103

plava - gpx trag koji ima PSS
zelena - kako je bilo mapirano u prethodnoj verziji
crvena - nova verzija
Branko Kokanovic (2024-05-22 17:16:07+00:00): Hajde pogledacu uskoro. To je golo podrucje - nisam video ni markacije, a ni stazu. Jedino mi je bilo logicnije da idem sa severne strane kuce da se popnem od potoka. Promotricu kad budem sledeci put isao gore!
Komadinovic Vanja (2024-05-22 17:19:20+00:00): Dogovor, javljaj a javim i ja ako odem pre :)
Branko Kokanovic (2024-06-26 16:53:10+00:00): 

Prosao sam ovde opet. Izbrisao sam nepostojecu stazu (duplu) u https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153212485. Probao sam da uslikam ceo deo mapilarijem, ali sam bio bajsem, pa je snimak malo blurry.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=44.11395247404198&lng=20.006624051380868&z=17.080969489390583
Filip009 (2024-05-14 16:28:15+00:00): Zdravím, prechod je nemožný po celej ceste https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372719915, alebo len po moste?
LavaLamp (2024-05-16 11:31:58+00:00): Bol som to pre istotu este raz skontrolovat, ale je tam naozaj zakaz vjazdu z oboch stran po celej dlzke, ako je na mape
LavaLamp (2024-05-16 11:56:11+00:00): Ale vidim, ze aj tak som to mal zle otagovane. Upravil som to v novom changesete.
Vinber-Pro (2024-05-11 19:05:40+00:00): j'ai sorti le nom descriptif et les fixme qui était pour ne pas perdre les objets à vérifier.

merci pour tout cela

il y a cette page pour précision si besoin https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:craft=beekeeper
jmapb (2024-08-01 02:45:19+00:00): Just did some updates to the Drawing Center (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249664327) and noticed you'd added wheelchair=no... they do have steps but there's also a sidewalk-level entrance, and the website (https://drawingcenter.org/visit) claims they have "accessible galleries, bookstore, and restroom facilities"
Vinber-Pro (2024-05-11 19:01:04+00:00): c'est vraiment un espace d'entrainement d'arts martiaux ?
MARTIN Rakotomamonjy (2024-05-11 19:35:34+00:00): oui vraiment, D'après nos enquête sur cet fonkotany qu'on a su que c'est un infrastructure pour les arts martiaux
b-holdet (2024-05-11 18:41:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151198701
Vinber-Pro (2024-05-11 19:19:40+00:00): je pense que c'est plutôt highway=path, chemin dans iD.

sinon le highway=footway, c'est plutôt urbain je pense
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-05 13:39:43+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44706500/history has shop = fast_food that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=fast_food ? Is it amenity=fast_food ? If not, what this tag is intended to mean? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfast_food
Justin1234 (2025-02-03 00:43:30+00:00): Hi sorry for late response, i agree it looks like shop=fast_food is deprecated. i don't know how that got added, i don't usually manually add tags, i mostly choose from the iD interface.

I just went back and applied the correct tag
tekim (2024-05-12 00:56:04+00:00): reverting an edit that added a fake beach - there is vegetation here in all available imagery, and no indication of sand or other loose surface.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151206685
mavl (2024-11-13 07:56:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159079151 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
NeisBot (2024-05-11 19:20:15+00:00): Hi keniope, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1282012409

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-14 05:41:26+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151253903
gscholz (2024-05-14 07:44:09+00:00): Hi  Grizelle,
this changeset has created several errors regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-16.96956&lat=14.41464&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151199838

I have just reverted it to fix those issues.
Guido
ManuelB701 (2024-05-13 05:05:34+00:00): Bruh, falsche Beschreibung. Was ich eigentlich meinte ist, dass ich die iD-Vorschläge für die Geschäfte an der Landskrongalerie genommen sowie einen nicht-existierenden Kreisel entfernt habe.
JeroenHoek (2024-05-11 20:56:21+00:00): Bron? De website plaatst hem alsnog op de Fahrenheitweg.
ToastHawaii (2024-05-12 07:41:43+00:00): Ik heb het ter plekke bekeken (en daar mijn was gedaan ;) ). Op de locatie van de website kwamen alleen pijpen uit de grond. Ik heb toen met de mensen daar gesproken en zij verwezen me naar de nieuwe locatie. We hebben ze geschreven over het verkeerde adres op hun website. (Automatisch vertaald)
Enock4seth (2024-05-13 08:49:49+00:00): Be careful with what and how you modify existing objects from Organic Maps. This changeset unfortunately changed the University of Ghana to Dr. Hilla Limann Hall. Happy mapping.
GeorgeKaplan (2025-12-09 03:38:42+00:00): Hi, 
In this changeset, you removed junction=roundabout near https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5083906#map=19/45.913264/6.143085&layers=N, can you please add it back cause routing is incorrect ?
TrickyFoxy (2024-05-13 09:14:08+00:00): landuse=military is not needed for this border area

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dborder_zone
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-05-12 12:06:11+00:00): Hi! Thanks for adding smoothness to paths and sidewalks. Is there a reason to remove paving_stones surface in the park's paths though?
Thanks!
Aurorose (2024-05-12 17:06:20+00:00): I feel like it isn't particularly paving stones but rather pebbles. I can take a picture later to show.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-05-12 17:47:18+00:00): No problem, but please replace the value instead of removing it, otherwise osmose and StreetComplete validations will say the surface is missing. :-)
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-05-12 17:48:02+00:00): You can find the correct surface here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface
Aurorose (2024-05-12 19:03:09+00:00): It should have replaced it, as I made sure to set the new surface. unsure why it didn't.

perhaps street complete uploaded it in a different changeset??
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-05-13 12:24:26+00:00): No problem, the surface have been updated on every path in the ark. Thanks!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-05-13 12:24:41+00:00): *park
chinook17 (2025-12-14 13:15:20+00:00): Pourquoi l'ajout d'accotements cyclables là où il y en a pas?