piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Cookie Guru (2026-04-14 02:11:43+00:00): Parcel Viewer will not tell you if a road is private.  You'll need to look up the plat map, where this is very clearly labeled private road.  Public roads do not have parcel numbers, and this road definitely does: https://blue.kingcounty.com/Assessor/eRealProperty/Detail.aspx?ParcelNbr=3945850240

I have reverted this edit
Kovoschiz (2026-03-02 11:33:31+00:00): Please don't add such `name=` , which is for proper names only. `temporary=yes` should be used.
felipeeugenio (2026-03-03 20:11:35+00:00): Hola. Borró el barrio por completo. Ya no existe?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179235333
NeisBot (2026-03-02 04:34:01+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/10863860521 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Military installation entrance"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-10 05:33:08+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179617001
(Restore previous tags)
Littlebtc (2026-03-02 04:44:35+00:00): Part 4: 龜山區樂善里1拆4，新增文桃、文樂、長樂里
FajrAl (2026-03-05 14:42:37+00:00): Butuh sumber rujukan perubahan batasnya; tambahkan tag source=*.
eggie (2026-03-02 07:39:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Beter een terugmelding doen richting Kadaster. Alle gebeouwen en adressen zijn directe import vanuit de BAG. 


https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Ernst+Casimirlaan+14&objectId=0014010011013255&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=232681.43699999998&geometry.y=582191.771&zoomlevel=15

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-03-02 05:15:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13610988244 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Funeral home"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-10 05:33:22+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179617012
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
chath_tsu (2026-03-20 19:24:59+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thank you for your work! I've noticed you recently added some bike lanes that you mapped as bike paths. Please note that, for bike ways to be mapped as separate ways and tagged as cycle paths, they have to be not inherently part of the roadway and physically separated from vehicle travel lanes. For a roadside bike path, there has to be physical barriers separating it from traffic (eg. curbs, jersey barriers, guardrails, planter strips). Otherwise, on-road bike lanes, including those with painted buffer but no physical barrier, are represented as cycleway= tags on the main roadway ways. You can find more information here: highway=cycleway and cycleway=*. Thanks for your effort and happy mapping!
Lenonn84 (2026-03-23 18:45:00+00:00): Thanks for letting me know! I saw someone else do it on st johns/james so I wasn't sure but I'll revert the bike portion of this change soon!
chath_tsu (2026-03-23 18:53:39+00:00): Thank you so much I appreciate it! Let me know if you have any questions :)
WilliamHarrison (2026-03-02 05:59:12+00:00): I am about halfway done with my changes on this intersection, will continue tomorrow.
Negreheb (2026-03-30 15:35:03+00:00): Servus BohdanF, hier sind dir leider ein paar Fehler passiert, du hast hier Straßen eingetragen, obwohl schon ein place eingetragen ist. Das ist leider falsch, manche Straßen haben einfach keine Namen. 
Und woher hast du denn die Info bzgl. der Postboxen (die falsch zu sein scheinen? Siehe andere Changesetkommentar)
Negreheb (2026-03-30 15:35:42+00:00): Und, bist du dir beim https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367283545 sicher? Laut basemat ist bei dem Gebäude die Hausnummer 8a, du hast das aber auf 8 geändert und beim anderen dafür 8a eingetragen? Ich würde sagen, dass es vorher richtig war.
Wildsharky (2026-03-05 06:28:21+00:00): Revert of 179229272
pwbriggs (2026-03-05 22:52:27+00:00): Yes https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Wildsharky, this is a partial revert of that changeset. See revert:id=* tag on this changeset.

Thanks!
amosharper (2026-03-02 09:07:21+00:00): Hello! Please do add useful changeset comments when uploading changes: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#Why_should_I_use_Changeset_Comments?

Please also try to upload changes for different geographical areas in separate changesets to keep your bounding box smaller. I can see you've added a treet in South Korea and another in Ecuador. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thank you!
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 04:26:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180138009
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179238096
NeisBot (2026-03-02 06:39:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13611065326 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Law office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-10 17:33:02+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179239390
arjunaraoc (2026-03-19 06:34:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180091865
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179238270
Wildsharky (2026-03-04 08:33:47+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179297780
rab (2026-04-03 19:44:24+00:00): It looks like you accidentally dragged the waterway
wolfy1339 (2026-03-02 23:18:35+00:00): Thank you for taking the time to add the facebook page for the museum!

Next time can you use the page's username instead of the share URL. In this case, it would be espace.felixleclerc
b-jazz (2026-03-04 15:54:36+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762941613

When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. If you could go back and clean up where you've made this mistake, that would be helpful. But more importantly, if you could stop from doing this in the future, it would be greatly appreciated. Please read the wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out.
gr8bambino (2026-03-04 16:20:01+00:00): I will absolutely go back and clean this up. Most of the fairway and greens had overlap already. But now that I have seen the best practice for these I will go back on all 18 holes. Thanks for the link to the wiki. Just trying to do my part to help.
b-jazz (2026-03-04 16:29:01+00:00): Thanks. Your help is appreciated. After spending 3 years cleaning up tens of thousands of golf courses, I find it hard to believe you found examples of fairways and greens that overlap. Can you give me some examples where this is happening? Thx.
b-jazz (2026-03-04 16:29:26+00:00): (Within the US, that is.)
007Transformer (2026-03-05 05:22:41+00:00):  Revert of 179233022
Wildsharky (2026-03-04 08:37:02+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179337352
arjunaraoc (2026-03-19 06:27:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180091630
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179239360
NeisBot (2026-03-02 07:30:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/932783621 v2 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/932783622 v2 | 5 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179239804
Yunkers (2026-03-02 10:35:38+00:00): Czy możesz podać gdzie przeczytałeś informacje że drogi bezkolizyjne oznaczamy jako trunk?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-02 10:54:37+00:00): please discuss reclassification of major roads at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40 first

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179248414
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-02 10:53:23+00:00): please discuss reclassification of major roads at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40 first

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179248370
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-02 10:49:51+00:00): please discuss reclassification of major roads at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40 first

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179248209
Lestercarvajal (2026-03-02 07:51:09+00:00): Gasolinera DINAMAX UNO carretera XILOA , VALLES DE SANDINO , CIUDAD SANDINO
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-02 10:48:48+00:00): please discuss reclassification of major roads at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40 first

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179248153
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-02 10:42:20+00:00): please discuss reclassification of major roads at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40 first

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179247830
AndyB_66 (2026-03-02 18:54:47+00:00): Nie, wydanie decyzji administracyjnej (ZnRID) nie oznacza, że S12 nie jest w budowie.
N9713 (2026-03-19 22:41:44+00:00): Durch diese "Berichtigung" gibt es statt einem Parkhaus am Klinikum jetzt fälschlicherweise drei. Außerdem wurde ein Großteil der tags, die das Parkhaus hatte, mit der Relation gelöscht. Ich bitte darum, das zu korrigieren.
José Miguel Picazo Núñez (2026-03-08 16:58:45+00:00): Good afternoon. I noticed that you reverted my changeset 176372480 with yours (179241314). By doing this, you are keeping incorrect data. Relation 8841276 is wrong. The boundaries for postcode 02008 are those indicated by Correos España at: https://www.correos.es/es/es/herramientas/codigos-postales/detalle?query=02008&searchtype=001. Please, let me fix the errors in my own city. Thanks.
gscholz (2026-03-09 11:58:07+00:00): Hi  José,
thanks for your kind feedback. You are free to fix my errors and your errors as well of course. Please watch out not to leave broken relations behind.
Guido
MappingMore (2026-03-02 11:30:38+00:00): Revert of 179229869
NeisBot (2026-03-02 08:18:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/6020939880 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Hair salon"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-10 17:33:03+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179262056
NeisBot (2026-03-02 08:24:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/6020939880 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Hair salon"

#MapWithoutSpam
Anonymous36863 (2026-03-02 08:24:44+00:00): excipient_free=*
arjunaraoc (2026-03-19 06:22:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180091395#map=19/14.389876/79.955470
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179242535
NeisBot (2026-03-02 08:54:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/4791412425 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cabinet d'Ostéopathie"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : « Cabinet d'ostéopathie »
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-10 17:33:04+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179249674
eggie (2026-03-02 09:50:08+00:00): Beste Astrid,

Hoe kan nu een adres veranderen op deze locatie?

Ik zal het adres weer herstellen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-02 09:52:07+00:00): Adres gegevens hersteld. Procedure. Haal de bedrijfsinfo hier weg en tag deze weer bij op het nieuwe adres.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=179243386
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-02 09:59:12+00:00): Bedrijf op nieuwe locatie bijgetagd.
eggie (2026-03-02 09:49:10+00:00): Dag Astrid,

Ik heb shop=gift verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
IvanaŠokčević (2026-03-02 09:12:28+00:00): Changed tag from hgv=destination to hgv=delivery later in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179243774 #OptimoRoute
NeisBot (2026-03-02 09:09:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13611246896 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Limo service office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-10 17:33:05+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179651156
(Restore previous tags)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-03-11 01:17:09+00:00): Reverted SEO spam POI added with solely a name, spammy description and website and no valid actionable tags.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179664547
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-11 01:24:26+00:00): NeisRevert actually reverted the SEO account's change to remove most of the promotional text from the description back to the version that had it, so I reverted the original addition.

Timelimocars, if you'd like for this POI node to stay and be useful on the map, besides eliminating the spammy description you should add at least one appropriate top-level tag describing what this node is actually supposed to be. If there's nothing specific enough to describe a limo company, you could just add office=company
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-11 07:50:01+00:00): Hi CAM Gerlach,

thanks for pointing this out.

In this case, the user changed the description from the added node (v1) to an updated version (v2), which was not properly covered by my bot’s rule set and therefore caused the incorrect revert. I have fixed the rule so this should not happen again.

Best regards.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-11 16:09:08+00:00): Thanks Pascal! By the way, thanks SO MUCH for the NeisBot suite--you are truly doing a hero's work helping eliminate SEO spam on OSM (never mind all your other OSM tools and activities). I don't know what we'd do without you!
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-11 16:47:51+00:00): Thanks for the kind words, Christopher!

I'm really glad to hear that NeisBot is helpful, and it's great to see others in the community caring about keeping OSM clean as well. I'll keep doing what I can on the tooling side, and feedback like yours really helps keep the motivation up 🙂
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-11 18:06:25+00:00): Awww, you're too kind, but you're most welcome Pascal! Your fantastic tools really help motivate me (and surely thousands of other mappers) to keep mapping as well, especially HDYC!

Speaking of which, your own kind words gave me the motivation to finally get around to typing up and sending you (via OSM user message) that feedback on HDYC that I messaged you about on Insta, both the original two inter-related issues and a few others I'd found. Cheers!
dzamper (2026-03-02 17:06:01+00:00): "street view" nie ma licencji która pozwalałaby na wykorzystywanie go do mapowania w OpenStreetMap
eggie (2026-03-02 09:46:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback... De info heb ik samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
habi (2026-03-02 09:17:12+00:00): Hier wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5185998
mueschel (2026-03-12 11:43:21+00:00): Please stop creating new accounts and importing your POIs one-by-one. Please read and obey the guidelines for imports and professional editing:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/6/62/Organised_Editing_Guidelines.pdf
NeisBot (2026-03-02 09:30:22+00:00): Hi Kris Mertz, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 89% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 natural(s)
- 40 waterway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179244481
woodpeck (2026-03-02 09:50:35+00:00): To elaborate on the automated message above: It appears that you have deleted a lot of streams that were at some point imported from the NHD. many of these are marked as "intermittent" i.e. they will not necessarily carry water. Please only delete them if you are a local and you can vouch for there not being any stream, at no time of the year. "I don't see water on the aerial image here" is not enough reason to delete such a stream.

Also, to avoid questions in the future, be sure to use good changeset comments that explain what you did. Had you, instead of labelling your changeset "Williams OR" which is pointless since we already know where it is, used a description like "removed streams where I am sure there isn't any water, ever" then we wouldn't have to wonder whether you knew what you were doing ;)
Kris Mertz (2026-03-02 22:08:39+00:00): Hello, I’ll do a better job in the future at properly labeling my changes and using correct tags. I am a local and know that a lot of these streams don’t exist, and it seems like a ton of them are from a mass import from like 2007. Thank you for the critique!
NeisBot (2026-03-02 10:03:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13611411328 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dentistry office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-10 17:33:10+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179651160
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
gscholz (2026-03-03 06:35:23+00:00): Hi EmanueleAby,
this changeset has left behind a broken boundary relation for "Parco Regionale del Taburno - Camposauro":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=14.61434&lat=41.12508&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Can you please fix this?
Guido
EmanueleAby (2026-03-03 07:03:35+00:00): Fixed it! Sorry for the inconvenience. I noticed in OSM it still looks this street is in a protected area, which technically is not, it's just outside it. Is there any way I can remove the via porreta and contrada vado degli anfratti from the protected area permanently?
gscholz (2026-03-03 08:19:43+00:00): Thanks for your quick response. May be you like to draw a new borderline beside the road?
Guido
muralito (2026-03-02 14:09:36+00:00): Hi apgosm. The same message that i sent to your coworker Neethu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179196555

Please keep the changesets within smaller bboxes. Edit a street in Mexico and save the changes. Then edit a street in Sydney. It helps a lot people who are "taking care or bboxes". Thanks.
apgosm (2026-03-03 11:07:09+00:00): Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well.
Regards, 
Arya.PG