piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Zedmoi (2025-08-16 00:41:12+00:00): That is a good question.  There is an approved development project going on there. It has been years in the making and that parking lot was closed for only private use when the businesses were shut down several years ago.  The navigational route is the only thing that was removed in this edit. There is no removal of the parking lot itself from the map as far as I could tell. That will be removed at some point as they are waiting to tearing it down with the building next to it. Right now the route is closed because the entrance to the parking lot has been recently embedded with a large electrical pole as they've added new lines along that side of the street for the coming development.  They will also remove or tow in any vehicles that they find on their private property.  Also, it has confused others to find a navigational route there as it seemingly provides access to the buildings and residences nearby which it does not as there is a large elevation change and a very tall concrete wall next to the parking lot that prevents any access to anything occupied nearby.
Let me know if you have any other questions.
Glassman (2025-08-16 02:34:11+00:00): Since the parking lot and service road still exist then they can be mapped in OSM. The service road was tagged as access=private, which seemed correct from what you describe. I see that someone else restored the service road. 

Once the parking lot is closed for rebuilding, then it would be appropriate to remove the service road. For example, I just removed a school building in Mount Vernon. When I drove by yesterday, it was being torn down.

I see that you updated the fence, which is appropriate, and thanks for that.
Zedmoi (2025-08-16 02:41:38+00:00): I understand and that makes sense. However, there's no actual Service road. It's just a driveway entrance and that driveway entrance as of now has a new electrical pole in the middle of it. Parking lot structure and building structure nearby are still intact. They were not removed from the mapping tool. Just the abandoned route. We can definitely leave it but it would be to the disadvantage of anyone that would attempt to navigate with it, including the property owner.
Glassman (2025-08-16 02:48:12+00:00): Wow - a pole in the middle of the driveway. It doesn't sound useable anymore. Would you mind leaving a changeset comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467479637 to explain to the mapper the issue with the driveway?
Zedmoi (2025-12-08 20:18:27+00:00): This lot and the road marked is completely gone now. It has been demolished. Previously when I noted it it was only closed.
tux67 (2025-08-15 07:22:17+00:00): Hi - Any particular reason or source for this series of changes?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170465356
aTarom (2025-08-15 07:57:20+00:00): Hi, first of all, I apologize for not adding enough detail in the comment and in the source of the changeset. I was simply following the wiki, where it specifies that place=islet, just like place=island, should be drawn counterclockwise.
I stop reviewing them one by one in case it’s not necessary for places that aren’t on the coast.
Kind regards.
tux67 (2025-08-15 08:02:59+00:00): thanks for the explanation .. Whatever the underlying logic may be of this instruction in the Wiki ...
mueschel (2025-08-21 09:55:23+00:00): Hi,
please don't add 50+ translations of a name to objects. The tags should only be used, if there is an actual name in that language.
Arianit (2025-08-21 11:12:44+00:00): ah, I didn't know that. thanks!
felipeeugenio (2025-08-15 14:06:22+00:00): Estimado. por favor. COncentrar sus ediciones en lugares pequeños. Hace ediciones que cubren medio Santiago y están llenas de errores y cosas que hay que mirar. Se le ha pedido esto en varias ocasiones. Por favor tomar en cuenta los comentarios que varios maperos le han hecho.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170465988
felipeeugenio (2025-08-15 15:06:48+00:00): La Avenida Avenida Canal Troncal San Francisco como es conocida realmente, en el SII aparece Solo como San Francisco, y en la cartelerìa en terreno aparece como San Francisco en algunos, con Troncal en otras y con Troncal y Canal en otras. Voy a preguntar en el chat.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170465988
Znaika (2025-11-01 12:20:50+00:00): Hi Skymoon010, es ist wirklich nur bis 20:00 Uhr geöffnet? Auf der Internetseite https://edeka-ney.com/markt/edeka-ney/ steht bis 21 Uhr. Gruß, Znaika
SLMapper (2026-02-09 15:03:09+00:00): Hi xylome, der Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422423933 ist schon an der Straße durch sidewalk=both erfasst. Ich habe ihn entfernt. Liebe Grüße
rempshaener (2025-08-16 08:14:16+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Du hattest einen Punkt einer Straße verschoben, das hat bereits ein anderer User mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170505776 bereits korrigiert. (Das wäre anhand der Fehlermeldung deines Editors erkennbar gewesen.)
Ansonsten: keine Anmerkungen.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
DD1GJ (2025-08-15 08:33:09+00:00): Revert

Hallo Hessischer Heilbäderverband,

OpenStreetMap ist eine Geodatenbank, aus deren Datenbestand unzählige Karten und Anwendungen erstellt werden. So ist es z.B. möglich, alle bei OSM eingetragenen Kunstwerke von Stephan Guber ( https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/29Vm ) zu ermitteln. Das Löschen der Einzelkunstwerke zerstört diese Informationsmöglichkeit. Daher habe ich die Löschungen rückgängig gemacht.

Viele Grüße, Joachim
Hessischer Heilbäderverband (2025-08-25 14:29:00+00:00): Hallo Joachim,

alles klar,
vielen Dank für die Info!

Viele Grüße
NieWnen (2025-09-13 19:38:54+00:00): I dlaczego to wycofujesz? Przecież to ty dokonujesz wandalizmu...
tux67 (2025-08-15 10:53:32+00:00): Hi, ich sehe hier du änderst an diversen Stellen name in inscription .. was ist die Quelle / Begründung für deine Maßnahme?
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170467643
tux67 (2025-08-15 10:58:20+00:00): Wenn wechseln dann wäre es https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:board:title
Es gibt dazu auch eine relativ aktuelle Diskussion im Forum -
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170467643
I_am_the_lazy_wanderer (2025-08-15 15:22:34+00:00): Hallo tux67.
"name" ist auf jeden Fall falsch bei solchen Hinweisschildern.
Irgendwo im Wiki hatte ich die Empfehlung "inscription" gefunden.
Aber "title" klingt auch sinnvoll.
Ich seh mir die Diskussionen später an, und werde "meine" Änderungen anpassen, wenn  die Diskussion mich überzeugt...
Danke für den Hinweis!
tux67 (2025-08-15 15:25:10+00:00): inscription ist auf jeden Fall "falscher" als name, in Zweifel reicht es schon dem Wiki zu folgen.
I_am_the_lazy_wanderer (2025-08-15 17:13:27+00:00): Noch falscher als "name" geht garnicht...
Denn das Schild heisst nicht "Schloss Rheydt" (um mal ein Beispiel zu nennen), und wenn auf der Karte zwei Meter neben der Autobahn der Text "Schloss Rheydt" erscheint, dann ist das irritierend.
Hier ist die Seite, die mich inspiriert hat: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE_talk:Tag:traffic_sign%3DDE:386.3

Dort ist halt sowohl der "title" als auch "inscription" erwähnt. In weiteren Diskussionen habe ich gelesen, dass Leute zu "inscription" tendieren, deshalb habe ich das genommen.
Aber dein Hinweis mit "title" war gut. Ich glaube, das passt besser.
Meine Änderungen gehe ich bald durch, und nehme "title" anstatt "inscription".
Aber auf keinen Fall "name"... ;-)
Hb- (2025-08-16 17:15:12+00:00): Bitte prüfe die Änderung der Wege https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224040324 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224040322 . Vorher haben sie eine Wendeschleife gebildet. Diese konnte auch von dem Bus https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2737822 genutzt werden. Die örtliche Aufnahme https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1115411842295937 deutet weiterhin auf Wendeschleife.
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-08-16 18:11:49+00:00): Passt doch, oder nicht?
s777n (2025-10-21 14:14:30+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста не забывайте добавлять addr:place если нумерация домов идет не по улице. Исправлено
martien-176 (2025-08-16 09:44:08+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping.

After mapping buildings, please remember to square their corners. Most buildings have square corners because that's easy to build. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that the corners should be squared. 

Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as roads and paths. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to keep nodes from snapping to other objects and accidentally connecting.

Please check out these sources for more info: 
- Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
- Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ 
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT global validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170469485
eggie (2025-08-15 09:07:19+00:00): Dag Marbled,

Tip.. Gebruik geen name=..... om iets te beschrijven. Dus geen name=huis, name=bankje, picnictafels table? 
De hoofdtag moet het doen. Dat geeft een symbool.
Ik haal name= Picnic table weg.

MVG
eggie
felidaelynx (2025-08-15 21:23:57+00:00): Is the Portes du Soleil area better as a piste site? Or would a multipolygon be better to be able to find it on openstreetmap?
Map47 (2025-08-16 09:30:42+00:00): Hello,
If you want to merge non-homogeneous areas, you must use a type:site relation, see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:site
You cannot use the type:multipolygon relation, see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
Happy mapping!
Jordi MF (2025-08-15 20:53:24+00:00): Gràcies pe la correcció. No sé d'on vaig traure el nom... Potser d'algun cartell situat a prop? Ara m'ha entrat la curiositat del meu propi error...

Salut!
Pooh01 (2025-09-22 12:51:05+00:00): Usunąłeś planowane drogi!
Między innymi tę: way/273185643
theDM (2025-09-22 13:40:55+00:00): Czy sa podejmowane działania w kierunku budowy?
Pooh01 (2025-09-23 09:28:46+00:00): Tak. Drogi ujęte są Studium Uwarunkowań i Kierunków Zagospodarowania Przestrzennego, miasto sukcesywnie wykupuje działki pod te drogi.
theDM (2025-09-23 09:33:08+00:00): Studium nie oznacza, że takie drogi powstaną. Mpzp też, jest dużo dróg z planem lub rezerwą od kilku lat, jak nie dekad, i nic się nie dzieje. Proposed służy do mapowania jedynie dróg,  które mają na pewno powstać w takim przebiegu.
Masz jakieś źródła na wykup gruntów albo przetargi?
Pooh01 (2025-09-23 10:01:58+00:00): Własność gruntów widać na rzeszowskim geoportalu. Co się dzieje dookoła wiem, bo tu mieszkam, więc prosiłbym abyś nie kasował nic siedząc gdzieś na drugim końcu Polski, a wykasowane drogi przywrócił.
Idąc Twoim tokiem rozumowania, to należałoby wykasować wszystkie elementy "proposed" bo nawet projekt budowlany nie oznacza, że obiekt powstanie.
theDM (2025-09-23 10:22:46+00:00): OSM i tagi proposed mają swoje zasady. Własność gruntu ok. Nie wywalam wszystkich proposed, bo całkiem dużo ma ślady budowy i zamiast usuwania nadają się do zmiany na lokalne kategorie. Jeżeli nie jest pewne, że droga powstanie, to nie powinna być mapowane.
asier70 (2025-09-23 10:49:04+00:00): To jeden z tematów, gdzie na obronę przeciwnych stanowisk można wyszukiwać najróżniejsze argumenty. Jeśli nie ma jednoznacznego zdania to lepiej utrzymywać na mapie coś co nie jest oczywistym błędem, a służy choćby części użytkowników. W tym przypadku szybko można się zorientować czemu pas ziemi nie ma zabudowy, czemu lepiej nie kupować działki za blisko itp. Poza tym elementy z tagiem proposed nie renderują się na większości portali i niczego nie zaciemniają. Jeśli w przyszłości zmieni się studium zagospodarowania to wtedy można zrobić korektę.
SpinOff (2025-10-17 23:40:19+00:00): Fikcyjne dane są według mnie gorsze niż usunięcie drogi, która może kiedyś powstanie i może w takim przebiegu.
custodiankeyy (2025-08-15 20:01:45+00:00): Yol gerçekten de resmi olarak hız sınırının 20 km/h olduğu yaya öncelikli yol mu?
FroschForscher (2025-08-15 13:37:43+00:00): Für die Geschichtsschreibung:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4507567
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163513358
osmmapper222 (2025-08-15 12:01:27+00:00): Reverte Verschiebung

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170477504
syntex (2025-08-15 12:28:24+00:00): highway=road is not correct
eggie (2025-08-15 11:11:03+00:00): Die invalidenparkeerstrook heb ik aangepast met een amenity=parking parking=street_side rondom.. Ecven als voorbeeld.
Gr eggie
bxl-forever (2025-08-15 10:09:13+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thanks for updating a name of a company.

We fixed your edit, to write the name in normal case instead of capital letters.
AndreaDp271 (2025-08-15 15:00:37+00:00): Ciao, grazie per il tuo primo contributo e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap; se sei interessato ti invito ad entrare nel canale telegram italiano per poterti confrontare, quando hai dubbi, con la community italiana. 😉
eggie (2025-08-15 11:17:08+00:00): Dag Tom,

Dat source=3dshapes zal niet meer  kloppen.  
Die regel kan weg. 
Nu ben jij zelf de bron.
De import van de verschillende kavens kwamen uit de 3dshaped. 
Die werkte met kadasterkavels. 
Soms is het wel handig om dat zo te houden omdat je de boomsoorten dan kunt onderscheiden van het ene kavel en het andere; naaldbomen, loofbomen e.d. Dus samenvoegen kan soms averechts werken. 

MVG
eggie
Tom van Dijk (2025-08-15 11:20:19+00:00): Aha. Volgens mij valt dat wel mee, van de (lucht)foto's die ik heb gezien lijkt het me een nogal homogeen bos.

Source is nu PDOK+BGT ja.
eggie (2025-08-15 11:26:54+00:00): Denk 't ook. Die kavels hebben natuurlijk met eigendomsrechten te maken.
Maar je vraagt feedback en dit is een onderwerp wat steeds weer terugkomt.
Wellicht om rekening mee te houden mocht je gaan samenvoegen. 
Mapse
eggie
Tom van Dijk (2025-08-15 11:53:01+00:00): Aha. Dat is goed om te weten. Maar goed dat ik de review aan had gezet ja! Volgens mij ligt het er nu wel aardig bij. Alleen nog ff die notes afhandelen en dan ben ik klaar met dit bos...
infeeeee (2025-08-28 11:38:25+00:00): Hello

atm=separate is documented in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aatm%3Dseparate
infeeeee (2025-08-28 11:44:03+00:00): And this "separate" option is used similarly with a lot other keys, e.g. street parking, railing, ramps... Do you plan to remove them as well? 

Where does it say atm=* is a boolean only key, I don't see anything about that in the wiki. In fact atm key doesn't even have a separate wiki page.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-28 12:00:56+00:00): > Do you plan to remove them as well? 

no, different keys have a different syntax
infeeeee (2025-08-28 12:06:22+00:00): Then will you revert this? Both banks were tagged according to the wiki.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-28 12:10:29+00:00): I can confirm that wiki page that you wrote agrees with tagging you used 

though that is not  a strong indicator that it is a desirable redefinition of atm= key, see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/atm#values
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-28 12:11:14+00:00): (though on the other hand if I edit wiki to say that my preferred tagging is better it is not a strong signal either)
infeeeee (2025-08-28 12:19:15+00:00): The value is very self explanatory. When I wrote the wiki page it was already used by others, so I just documented the 3rd most common value. Only one of the 2 banks was edited by me, so it's not even my edits. This value is used all over the World, so it's not a local, personal tag: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?w="atm"%3D"separate"+global&R=
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-28 12:22:35+00:00): documenting third common value (0.14%) for boolean key as good idea is suspect at best

I guess that it would be better to discuss it more widely, probably at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/general/tagging/70
infeeeee (2025-08-28 12:25:39+00:00): Please ping me in the thread, I use the same username on the forum.
fortera_au (2025-08-15 13:14:45+00:00): Hi, is there a reason for tagging access=no? Also, is there signage for walking, if not then foot=designated isn't correct.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170473566
Ballpoint (2025-08-15 14:29:17+00:00): Apologies if I've labelled it wrong, I thought all=no meant to stop it from having them all as yes and to them toggle it for foot traffic.

There is no signage for walking, but it's a footpath? I thought that's what designated meant. The road is still there, that change should have only been for the footpaths either side.

Again apologies if I'm mistaken, still in the learning process but happy to admit when I'm wrong.
fortera_au (2025-08-15 21:42:21+00:00): Designated means there's some kind of signage. 

Access=no isn't needed since it's assumed by default that cars can't go on footpaths, you generally only need to add restrictions if it differs from the norm. You've actually excluded bicycles here, which are legally allowed on footpaths.
Ballpoint (2025-08-15 22:11:39+00:00): My bad! I've just jumped back onto a computer to redo it, looking at pretty much all other footpaths they are all foot = designated too?

Happy to toggle the All back to yes and also add bicycle = yes but do all the other footpaths need to be changed as well?
fortera_au (2025-08-15 22:16:12+00:00): There is the possibility they're signed as part of a walking/cycling route, but if not then I'd say removing it is fine, if it's a highway=footway way.
Ballpoint (2025-08-15 22:23:23+00:00): Thanks for the help! Only really played around with public/private and re-aligning roads/paths so still getting my head around it all.
ti-lo (2025-08-15 10:24:52+00:00): DiogoBaptista98 commented on the old changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169838198
AndreaDp271 (2025-08-15 14:04:40+00:00): Hi there, and thanks a lot for your contribution! 🌟 Just a little tip for future edits: keeping changesets small and local can make things smoother for everyone. It helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, and keeps the map even more accurate.

A few friendly suggestions: • Focus edits within a small geographical area (like a single city, district, or province) • Try not to mix far-apart locations in one changeset • Save/upload before starting work in a totally different area

If you’re curious, the wiki explains more here: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks again for your mapping energy, and happy mapping! 🗺️

Why is it important to remind both new and experienced users to keep changesets limited to a specific area? First of all, not all editors can handle loading large amounts of data, as happens with iD (link). More importantly, a large bounding box (covering, for example, half the world or all of Northern Italy) makes it harder for other mappers—both local and remote—to review the changes, even when using modern tools like Better OSM or OsmCha.
strobus (2025-08-17 10:03:14+00:00): Apologies, I've been  procrastinating adding a number of OSM points for years and thought better late than never. WIll try to add fewer at a time.
user_23181505 (2025-08-15 11:02:21+00:00): Kapanan bir market haritadan silindi, yapı kredi ayvalık şubesi haritaya eklendi. İlçedeki bazı süpermarketlerin marka tagı eklendi.
Filip009 (2025-08-16 09:50:54+00:00): Hello, is it coffe shop or coffe place?
wandering_egg (2025-08-26 10:56:51+00:00): Hi, it's actually both, but it should indeed be marked as a coffee place / cafe. I just posted an edit to change that.
pitfire (2025-08-16 03:47:56+00:00): Hallo HC Ahlmann,
willkommen bei OSM und danke für Deine Beiträge. Du hattest um ein 
"review_requested" gebeten. Habe ein paar kleinere Anpassungen korrigiert. Was noch offen ist, ist der etwas ungewöhliche Umriss von Weg: Weg: 1380607046 (brownfield)? 
Kannst Du möglicherweise nochmals prüfen.
VG pitfire
HC Ahlmann (2025-08-16 06:20:51+00:00): Da ist mir ein Eckpunkt zwischen Änderung und Hochladen verloren gegangen.
user_21183540 (2025-08-16 02:26:40+00:00): Hey GenericUser82 👋🏾. It was nice to see the addresses. I think it would be better to use addr:housenumber along with addr:street or addr:place.
Mathias_ADAV (2025-10-07 15:52:48+00:00): Bonjour, les pistes sont déja tracé, je remplace par cycleway:both = separate Bon mapping! Mathias
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-16 06:51:12+00:00): #NameChange

Hi, welcome to OSM.

In this changeset, you have made numerous name changes, which included removing/modifying names. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-16 06:51:46+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170480478
rempshaener (2026-06-08 18:40:21+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier mehrere Hydranten gedoppelt; z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13072375901 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12992401802.
Viele Grüße
paul1248 (2026-06-08 22:23:19+00:00): Hallo,
Da muss es sich um einen Systemfehler handeln. Die Hydranten sind seinerzeit lediglich nur einmal eingetragen worden.
rempshaener (2026-06-10 18:37:23+00:00): Danke dir für die Korrektur und viele Grüße.
b-jazz (2025-08-16 15:17:19+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/855583732

Hey there jdasmh,

Thanks for the efforts to clean up golf courses. It's much appreciated. There's a problem with this green (and possibly others). You aren't sharing the nodes of each and ever node at the border between the fairway and the green. That creates overlaps (that set off Q/A checks) and gaps between the fairway and green. Please make sure future edits share every single node. Thanks!
phoenixsaigon1698 (2025-08-18 03:54:30+00:00): Rất cám ơn bạn đã chỉnh sửa vài changeset đầu tiên cho OSM VN. Bạn hãy vào profile của mình để xem qua hoặc học chỉnh sửa OSM trên learnosm.org nhé.
AnnaCatarina (2025-10-28 13:03:34+00:00): Hello Mapitero,
I think, it is still under construction and not open yet. Where do You get the info, it is already exisitng?
Regards,
Anna Catarina
mapitero (2025-10-28 18:03:28+00:00): Hi Anna, thank you for your message!

Are you talking about the roads I added or the train line I touched? If regarding the railway, I just touched it, but didn't change any tagging, so I can't answer you properly (better talking to the person who created/changed the tags).

Still, I'm Brazilian, so if you need any help finding/validating information, let me know!

Best,
Matheus
AnnaCatarina (2025-10-29 13:31:17+00:00): Hello Matheus,
thanks for answering.
Yes, it is about Nova Transnordestina railway, which is still under construction between Iguatu and Acopiara, if You have a look on the latest satellite pics and also StreeetView. Well, I do just have info like https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnordestina. I think, I am setting this on "under construction".
Regards,
Anna Catarina
mapitero (2025-10-29 17:16:37+00:00): It seems this part mapped is already constructed, per official website: https://www.csn.com.br/quem-somos/grupo-csn/tlsa/

Also, on Youtube, 2 days ago someone posted a video that the railway is just 5 km away from Acopiara city center: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZAViTCoTyM

So perhaps the tagging is supposed to be railway indeed, instead of construction?