piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BCNorwich (2024-12-01 11:55:33+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The allotment site outline is already mapped, I've added your new data to the outline as per OSM practice.

Regards Bermard.
Bolt032 (2025-01-20 13:41:45+00:00): Hi Yunkers,
Is it the only_right_turn relation relation 18355401 added correctly?According to Geoportal 2: Orthophotomap (latest aerial imagery) (WMTS) there seems to be no restriction going straight on Jana Kochanowskiego.
Additional to this, one of our drivers brought to our attention this.
Best regards,
Cristian
Yunkers (2025-01-20 19:28:57+00:00): Hi. 
It looks like my mistake. I will correct as soon as I can.
Thanks,
Bolt032 (2025-01-22 08:40:54+00:00): Hi,
Can I remove it?
Yunkers (2025-01-22 16:15:23+00:00): I have just removed it. Let me know if it's correct.
Bolt032 (2025-01-23 07:58:47+00:00): Yes, the restriction is removed. 
Thank you!
joost schouppe (2024-12-01 11:59:03+00:00): Thanks!
tux67 (2024-12-01 11:21:38+00:00): Hi Kelso .. schon gesehen? MG hat jetzt auch einen eigenen WMS Dienste Server .. https://geoportal.moenchengladbach.de/wms/hotlinks/geoportal/index.html 
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159800854
user_3716049 (2024-12-03 08:28:05+00:00): Nein, die haben ihr Geoportal ja klammheimlich neu aufgesetzt ohne, das irgendwo mitzuteilen. Dabei ist das ja vom Design und auch vom Angebot der Daten, ein beachtlicher Fortschritt.
Die haben laut eigenen Angaben sogar Daten von OSM (Taxistände u. zum Teil Bushaltestellen) übernommen.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-06 09:58:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/365052851/history - is it open or not?

disused:amenity=pharmacy and healthcare=pharmacy are in conflict
user_3716049 (2025-05-07 10:17:33+00:00): Thanks for your note,
ADLER pharmacy has been closed down it's business, fixed healthcare key with changeset 165930769.
silversurfer83 (2024-12-01 15:56:52+00:00): Moin :)

kleiner Hinweis zu Objekten, die schließen:
Gerade sowas wie Tankstellen hinterlassen ja gerne noch eine Weile einen Haufen Dinge (Dach, Verkaufsraum, Werkstatt,...) die das ganze nach Tankstelle aussehen lassen. Auch viele andere Objekte hinterlassen entsprechend Räumlichkeiten.

So lange solche Räume übrig bleiben ist es eigentlich besser den Punkt nicht zu löschen, sondern die Informationen mit Hilfe der Lebenszyklus Präfixe zu ändern:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159800941
Jensefred (2024-12-01 20:00:37+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis.

Intention war die Info "Da ist ne Tankstelle" zu entfernen, das Gebäude ansich steht ja noch.
silversurfer83 (2024-12-01 20:19:07+00:00): Hi :)

Dachte ich mir. Da es aber nun ein nicht mehr als Tanke genutztes Tankstellenensemble ist, wäre Lebenszyklus halt schöner.

Ist aber jetzt nicht sooo dramatisch. Nur für die Zukunft kannst du dir das Konzept vielleicht mal merken

Grüße ins Lahntal
silversurfer83
silversurfer83 (2024-12-01 15:59:52+00:00): Moin :)

du hast hier ein Gebäude gelöscht und dafür ein neues eingezeichnet. Dabei ist die Adressinformation an dem gelöschten Gebäude verloren gegangen. War das Absicht?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159801236
Jensefred (2024-12-01 19:59:05+00:00): Guude,
da waren vorher nur Linien, keine Flächen oder Gebäude. Sonst hätte ich das nicht geändert...
Gruß
silversurfer83 (2024-12-01 20:16:44+00:00): Verstehe.

Den Linien fehlte nur eine entscheidende Information: building=yes

Wenn du nämlich mal in die Historie der gelöschten Linien schaust, siehst du, dass da eine Weile zumindest die Adresse dran hing
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1060095364/history

Check doch mal, ob die Adresse so korrekt war und trag sie dann wieder ein
Jensefred (2024-12-02 08:55:10+00:00): Erledigt, hab Adressen hinzugefügt/korrigiert mit Daten aus dem GIS (sofern hinterlegt).
Gruß aus Wollmar
silversurfer83 (2024-12-02 09:42:57+00:00): Top
Danke
Sanniu (2025-12-31 13:58:24+00:00): Hi, there is no אודם street nearby, are you sure that place is correct?
GOwin (2024-12-02 06:27:15+00:00): Hello there! I just want to let you know that I've noticed your recent OSM edits, and would like to thank you for helping make a better map for your neighbourhood. Kudos!

If you have questions, or you're curious about what fellow mappers are doing, check out the local community channels: https://osm.org/wiki/PH (the Telegram channel is the most active, but feel free to check out the other platform you're already on)

/GOwin
rhtb0 (2024-12-18 13:40:09+00:00): 안중역으로 향하는 도로는 2차도로가 아닙니다. 자꾸 변경하지 마세요. 2차도로는 지방도에만 사용합니다.
rhtb0 (2024-12-18 13:41:22+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:%ED%95%9C%EA%B5%AD%EC%9D%98_%EB%8F%84%EB%A1%9C
지방도: 2차 도로
한국의 '지방도'에는 '2차 도로'(highway=secondary) 키를 씁니다.

한국에서 '지방도'에는 광역 지자체장이 관리하는 ‘특별시도·광역시도’와 ‘지방도’ 그리고 ‘국가지원지방도’가 포함됩니다.
특별시도와 광역시도의 도로번호 표지는 흰색 여덟모꼴 표지를 씁니다. 특별시도나 광역시도는 지역에 따라 도로번호가 부여되지 않는 경우도 있습니다.
지방도의 도로번호 표지는 노란색 네모꼴 안에 도로 번호가 적혀 있으며 도로번호는 서너 자리 숫자를 씁니다. 단, '국가지원지방도'는 표지는 '지방도'와 같이 노란색 네모꼴 표지를 쓰지만 도로 번호는 '국도'와 같이 두 자리 숫자를 씁니다.
OSM에서는 옅은 노란색으로 나타납니다.
rhtb0 (2024-12-18 13:43:04+00:00): 국도나 지방도, 시도등이 아닌 도로에 123차 도로를 사용하지 마시기 바랍니다. 
1차도로=국도 2차도로=지방도 3차도로=시도·군도·구도 입니다.
HellMap (2024-12-04 22:28:08+00:00): Čau,

Nekur tas gluži nav apspriests un OSM par to precīzi nav aprakstīts. Bet teritorijas kā mazdārziņi parasti zīmē līdz to faktiskajām robežām, pat ja tie atšķiras no kadastrālajām līnijām un kartēm. Iemesls ir, jo OSM ir principā bāzēts uz "patiesību dabā" - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ground_truth . It īpaši mazdārziņiem bet pat arī apdzīvotām platībām ir tendence "izplūst" ārpus īpašumu robežām. Šeit piemēram ziemeļos tā sanāk. Vai nu vēsturiski, vai nepareizi nomērīts, vai neprecīzi sadalīts, vai pat apzināti. Vai arī otrādi - netiek lietots, kā piemēram https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9884901809 . Citiem vārdiem - ir kadastrālā teritorija un ir faktiskā lietošana - un tie var nesakrist. Ja tur liela atšķirība, tad faktiski kadastrālo jeb precīzāk administratīvo robežu tad zīmē ar robežu relācijām.

Tas viss tā - pārdomām ;) Nezinu, cik vērts ieguldīt laiku šo vietu perfektēšanai.
Mezonens (2024-12-04 23:33:42+00:00): Paldies par komentāru. :)
lordmcdrake (2024-12-02 07:33:09+00:00): Ahoj, toutou úpravou si trošku rozbil Poloniny :) editoval si i "reláciu", ktorá asi s vysielačom nemá v skutočnosti nič spoločné https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6425334

Revertni si tento change, postup si naštuduj napr tu:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Change_rollback
Filip009 (2024-12-06 09:22:56+00:00): Aj spravil z lesa budovu https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6425334/history
nevw (2024-12-02 23:37:48+00:00): Hi, 
this is too complex to use a single multipolygon to contain all the landuse areas. I suggest using simple polygons instead and use multipolgons for areas where you have valid inners (I see you have a separate one like this) and where you want to share sides of adjoining polygons instead of duplicating ways. The area is already bound by the NP boundary
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon_Examples
nevw (2024-12-03 12:01:46+00:00): Osmi view https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.91220&lat=-26.87946&zoom=13
Deuar (2024-12-03 19:32:41+00:00): Hmm, yeah, I'll go simplify this one. Seems to work fine in josm and carto, but I suppose some renderers could have trouble.
JezCrow (2024-12-04 21:04:28+00:00): Have the University of South Wales *really* taken over this car park? This latest Mapillary imagery from just three weeks ago clearly shows it's still an NCP car park - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1616380892316503&focus=photo
Nakaner-repair (2024-12-01 11:51:33+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 156459519, 156459661, 156470932, 156471028, 156471071, 156471312, 156471346, 156471405, 156471457, 156471518, 157038316, 157038342, 157038487, 157038672.
mcliquid (2024-12-04 12:27:29+00:00): Aus meiner Sicht passt zwar alles, aber Bad Karlshafen und Hohenfels sind ziemlich weit auseinander.
wambacher (2024-12-04 15:19:40+00:00): oops, ja das hast du recht.

Ich mache die CS in JOSM manuell zu, was mir mehr Flexibilität gibt und damit alle Änderungen an einer Stelle in genau einem CS zusammenfasst.
Leider passiert es mir schon mal, dass ich vergesse, den alten CS abzuschließen und dann kommt solches raus:(
mcliquid (2024-12-04 15:28:04+00:00): Nicht als Kritik verstehen bitte, die Änderungen sind sehr hilfreich. Manchmal kann es bei so großen Changesets nur sein, dass sich Ausversehen irgendwo anders etwas eingeschlichen hat.
Deshalb einfach nur kurz die Rückfrage :)
wambacher (2024-12-05 10:05:45+00:00): alles ok.
habi (2025-01-01 22:20:40+00:00): Ciao Maper8957
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7449564882 hast du mit `level=first` korrrigiert.
In OpenStreeMap werden die Stockwerke/level in Zahlen erfasst, vorher war die Toilette mit level=3 erfasst.
Ist ächt im ersten *und* im 3. Stock eine Toilette?
Gruss,
habi
literan (2024-12-02 19:50:34+00:00): но усадьба это же не одно строение, а весь комплекс. или я не прав?
Zkir (2024-12-03 02:39:28+00:00): Literan, ты прав, но не совсем. :)

В русском языке, слово "усадьба" означает, разумеется,  не одно, а целый комплекс зданий. Тем не менее, англоязычная осм-вики  для тега historic=manor дает значение 'главный дом дворянской усадьбы' (manor house), 'особняк' (mansion).

При этом, у наших помещиков были еще и *городские усадьбы* (см. например, тут: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%8F:%D0%93%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B4%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D1%83%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%8C%D0%B1%D1%8B_%D0%9C%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B2%D1%8B) --  в отличие от англосаксонских, которым приходилось ютиться в таунхаусах.
domeqasz (2024-12-01 21:59:39+00:00): wycofuje; nazwa jest niepoprawna
Dawid2849 (2024-12-01 22:05:56+00:00): Aha. Na jakiej podstawie tak stwierdzasz? Twoja edycja nie zawiera żadnego źródła, moja ma źródło UM Warszawa.
Dawid2849 (2024-12-01 22:08:17+00:00): Ta nazwa w ogóle nie powinna być w OSM, bo jeszcze może zostać zaskarżona i może wcale jej nie być.
Yukiro (2024-12-01 22:40:29+00:00): Dodał do trawnika znowu...
eggie (2024-12-02 09:24:09+00:00): Hi Saeed,

Welcome to OSM in the Netherlands.
It seems okay to me.

Greetz,
eggie
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 01:19:32+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164876683
pavvv (2024-12-01 13:28:41+00:00): Zmiany kategorii i wytyczne tagowania łącznic zostały przedyskutowane na forum:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/drogi-ekspresowe-jako-highway-motorway/95192/259
pavvv (2024-12-01 20:02:33+00:00): To fajnie, że zignorowałeś note na tej drodze https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188762273 + czy cokolwiek w terenie wskazuje na to, że to ma numer 11, a nie S11 jak reszta drogi? W wielu miejscach w Polsce można zobaczyć, że znak D-7 nie jest równoznaczny z ref=S*

Zmiany wycofałem. Jakiekolwiek obiekcje proszę przedyskutować na forum.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2024-12-01 18:59:16+00:00): Merhaba. OpenStreetMap'e yol eklerken ölçüt yolun imar planında olup olmaması değil, yolun gerçekte mevcut olup olmaması. Gerçekten insanların, araçların yol olarak kullandıkları fakat imar planında olmayan yollar OpenStreetMap'e eklenebilir. Sırf imar planında yok diye bu yolların silinmesi veya zemindeki duruma aykırı olarak değiştirilmesi doğru değil.
Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ground_truth
eggie (2024-12-01 13:49:24+00:00): Dag Lanteas. Het routeert nog steeds niet, want het vevolg (beide rijbanen)  staat op access=no  . Klopt dat wel?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-12-01 14:24:51+00:00): Ik heb access=no verwijderd. Laat maar weten als het niet klopt.

MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-01 13:01:03+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779623115
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779623109
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/912405902

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rskedgell (2024-12-02 15:54:15+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for updating this.

If a road is a driveway, it should be tagged as highway=service + service=driveway.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway
MichS (2025-06-05 03:27:53+00:00): Hallo,
Östlich von Wörsbach wurden mehreren landw. Flächen als MP angegelgt. Was war bitte die Absicht dabei?

MFG
gscholz (2024-12-06 10:50:41+00:00): Hi Irshadpp,
your recent edits have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines and duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=76.02747&lat=10.72422&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2025-01-22 07:06:28+00:00): Hi Irshadpp, 
these errors still exist. Can I get your feedback here?
Guido
Irshadpp (2025-01-22 08:53:50+00:00): Hi dear,
Can you review now.

With regards
olo81 (2024-12-01 18:11:29+00:00): jeśli nie jest to już myjnia to kasujemy amenity=car_wash. 
Też nie rozumiem opisu w nazwie. Jak już jej nie ma to po prostu kasujemy nazwę.
multimob (2024-12-09 10:34:28+00:00): Bonjour. Je voudrais signaler une petite erreur ici. Par convention, on écrit toujours "NMBS/SNCB" afin d'avoir une chaîne de caractère unique dans toute la Belgique. Nous allons corriger.
tastrax (2024-12-07 04:33:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.  FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
silversurfer83 (2024-12-01 16:01:57+00:00): Moin Markus

kurze Frage: Hast du vor die Durchlässe noch zu bearbeiten?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159806842
SuperMarkus (2024-12-01 18:06:21+00:00): Natürlich. Sei doch innerhalb so kurzer Zeit nicht so nervös. Dass mit andauernden Timeouts heute hier bei OSM alles länger dauert, sollte eigentlich klar sein.
silversurfer83 (2024-12-01 18:09:12+00:00): Alles klar :)

Kannte deinen Modus Operandi noch nicht und da frag ich bei sowas lieber nach

Schönen Sonntag :)
SuperMarkus (2024-12-01 18:18:02+00:00): Ich kann gerade gar nichts bearbeiten, nicht mal an die hochgeladenen GPX Tracks komme ich gerade. Überall Fehlermeldungen. Mit VPN nach USA kann ich zumindest hier kommentieren. Einige der OSM-Server scheinen gerade nach der Debian-Migration noch Probleme zu haben. Hatte mich schon gewundert, warum jeder Pups-Upload aus Osmand heute so lange gedauert hat. Am PC ist's hier gerade völlige Katastrophe.
silversurfer83 (2024-12-01 19:02:31+00:00): Ach je.

Könnte erklären, warum OSMCha grad nicht so rund läuft.

Weiter viel Erfolg
jbcharron (2024-12-01 19:31:08+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour vos contributions
Pourquoi avoir remplacé, la valeur du tag access=no par bus ?
Le tag bus=yes indique déja que cette voie est accessible au bus. Le tag access=no a volontairement été ajouté pour empêcher tous gps d'utiliser cette voie qui n'est pas autorisé pour les voitures.
Bonne soirée
alan_b57 (2024-12-01 20:20:27+00:00): Bonsoir,

J'utilise un jeu de simulation sur les transports en commun qui utilise la carte et les données d'OpenStreetMap et il y a une petite partie à l'est de cette voie bus qui n'est pas considéré comme une route. J'ai donc voulu mettre le access en bus afin de voir si cela est désormais considéré comme une voie bus partout.

Je m'en excuse si cela change tout. Si ce n'est pas remis à "no" je vais m'en occuper.

Bonne soirée à vous également,
jbcharron (2024-12-02 17:10:21+00:00): Aucun soucis :)
Malheureusement on ne peut pas modifier la carte pour satisfaire un outil tiers.
Ici on indique par défaut que la route n'est pas accessible en utilisant le tag access=no mais en ajoutant une exception avec le tag bus=yes.
On pourrait indiquer aussi que c'est une voie de bus avec highway=busway, mais ce n'est pas considéré comme telle car il n'y a pas de voie pour les voitures, parallèles a cette voie.
Bonne soirée
alan_b57 (2024-12-02 17:13:27+00:00): Bonsoir,

Oui effectivement je ne veux pas non plus modifier la route pour qu'elle ne corresponde pas aux données réelles et que cela ne soit pas en accord avec les infos réelles et juste pour un outil hors OpenStreetMap.

Bonne soirée.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-01 14:01:03+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12388170214

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
map per (2024-12-03 07:07:03+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
Joanna Butler (2024-12-02 16:29:47+00:00): Thank you so much for getting in touch!  Sadly you can't be emailed with attached drawings, so here goes: 
Yes indeed, our neighbours at Low Bridge End are getting really fed up of people traipsing through their Tea Garden (without stopping for tea) following their apps, as this is NOT a public right of way or a permissive path.  
I live opposite, at Fornside Farm, and I offered to help as we had the same problem with people using OS routes and also All Trails and Komoot ... editing the Open Street Map seemed to solve it for us.  However, I cannot seem to alter it successfully at Low Bridge End.  

From what I can see, the informal path from the gate past the Tea Garden should be marked as PRIVATE and not open to anyone either on foot or anything, and also the track across the river to the road should also be PRIVATE, it is not a public right of way or a permissive path.
gurglypipe (2024-12-05 12:13:55+00:00): Thanks for your reply, and thanks for helping your neighbours out, that’s kind.

(For anyone else reading along, this is in reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159776098#c1355574)

You have managed to edit the map successfully, but I have re-edited the tagging since, as the tags you’d chosen didn’t match the description you’d given of the issue.

Previously you said the path running along the south side of the tea garden is for the owners and customers. That implies that foot=customers is the appropriate tagging. In your message now you say that it’s private and not open to anyone (except presumably the owners), which would suggest foot=private is appropriate.

Both foot=customers and foot=private should prevent walking apps from routing people along the path by default, but in any case it will likely take a few weeks to a few months for all the apps to update — they only periodically re-download their data from OSM (and other sources) to update their maps. So unfortunately any change we make to fix this in OSM will take some time to trickle down to users.

Additionally, the tagging informal=yes relates to whether a path is planned, rather than whether it’s a public right of way. A good example of informal=yes would be a path which cuts the corner on a playing field (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:informal%3Dyes). So from what you say, I don’t think this path is informal (in the OSM sense).

So, to sum that up: if the path is meant to be used by customers (but not the public), it should be foot=customers. If it’s only meant to be used by the owners (and not customers or the public), foot=private. I would suggest removing informal=yes in any case, and unfortunately whatever we do here will take several weeks to trickle down to users of walking apps. But it will get there in the end.

Let me know if that makes sense, and I can make the appropriate changes and double-check things with you. Ta
Joanna Butler (2024-12-05 13:12:00+00:00): Hello again, thanks for your help on this.  The path is for customers (I was trying private as I was only giving it 24hours to update OS maps, not realising this might take weeks).  The other area is the track from the NE tip of this path, both across the bridge to the road (only for customers) and the track going North past their barns and the wood (private).  Huge thanks again.
gurglypipe (2024-12-05 13:25:04+00:00): OK, thanks for the confirmation. I’ve changed the tagging in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159957219 — if you want to take a look at it and confirm it matches the state of things, I think we should be done here.

As I said, it’ll take several weeks for the changes to percolate down to people’s apps. Unfortunately there’s no way round that.

One follow-up question: currently there are some customer toilets mapped in the building just south of the path. There’s a note on them asking to confirm their location — are you able to confirm whether they’re in that building or whether they’re somewhere else around the farm? It would be nice for me to be able to get that sorted while you’re here!

Thanks again
Joanna Butler (2024-12-05 14:09:56+00:00): Thank you for all your help.
The toilet (just one I am sure) is in the right place.  Its only for tea garden customers.
gurglypipe (2024-12-05 14:13:34+00:00): No worries, glad to help get things sorted. Feel free to leave a note on the map or message me (https://www.openstreetmap.org/message/new/gurglypipe) if you find any further problems around your local area.

I’ve updated the note on the toilet and checked that it’s tagged as only being for customers to use.

Thanks again for your help!
mavl (2025-02-05 14:03:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162167075 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: wrong values for name:en - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161608012].
OddBunsen (2024-12-03 01:03:26+00:00): These road classification changes make sense, but I'm wondering what criteria you're using to make the changes?
1998alexkane (2024-12-03 08:25:52+00:00): Most of the changes are based on the classification guidelines that I drafted: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wisconsin/Highway_Classification
which in turn was based on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance
OddBunsen (2024-12-04 03:36:39+00:00): Nice, thanks!