piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rab (2025-08-01 17:05:54+00:00): I can only identify two buildings here. The building you repaired is only about 4 m² in size. I switched back and forth between Bing and Mapbox imagery to get a better picture of the situation. Most of the errors addressed in this Maproulette challenge are typical beginner problems. When looking after these problems you will always find more issues nearby. A good pointer for areas that need a lot of rework. So please be careful, to not only obscure other problems, that are much more difficult to detect automatically.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-27 10:11:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180494113 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some poor quality and some fantasy mapping in Ukraine
RafalR (2025-08-02 13:06:28+00:00): Gdy dodajemy np. ścieżkę to łączymy ją z istniejącą, już wyrysowaną infrastrukturą. Ścieżka rowerowa nie była połączona z jezdnią - poprawiłem
Filip009 (2025-08-02 12:33:23+00:00): Hello, it would probably be better to use building:part=yes instead of area=yes
Comino (2025-08-01 19:50:18+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#legacy-tags
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin
joost schouppe (2025-09-04 09:11:45+00:00): Here and on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/865906107
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/938909801
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1023582389
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1023582391
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/865295331
you added building=church on chapels. I've fixed them all
Mashin (2025-08-02 17:04:09+00:00): Hi and thanks for improving OSM!

Businesses like this one have to be placed on a building they reside in. Right now it points to a random place next to a highway, which is not correct.

Cheers
Patchanka (2025-08-01 16:01:05+00:00): màj Hastingues, source survey
Oskarst_ (2026-07-09 07:38:49+00:00): Det har kommet flere kommentarer på at en del veiene og stiene i dette området ikke finnes. Det er også lagt ved bilder som tilsynelatende bekrefter dette. Har du noen innvendinger mot at veiene fjernes?
Ruslan Fatih (2025-08-26 02:26:31+00:00): Пожалуйста, не удаляйте названия на русском. Заменяйте их на name:ru. 

Мне не приятно, что переписывают или удаляют мой труд.
Ruslan Fatih (2025-08-26 02:27:15+00:00): Орыс тіліндегі атауларды жоймаңыз. Оларды name:ru

Менің жұмысымды қайта жазу немесе жою маған ұнамайды.
infeeeee (2025-08-05 13:22:49+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Lakó-pihenő övezetnél a többi címkét is hozzá kéne frissíteni. Ha nincs egyéb tábla, akkor ezeket a címkéket kellene még felvinni: 

maxspeed=20
maxspeed:type=HU:living_street
vehicle=destination
bicycle=yes

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közúti_jelzőtáblák#Tájékoztatást_adó_jelzőtáblák

Most ellentmondásos, hogy ott maradt az 50-es illetve 30-as korlátozás is, nem világos, hogy most 50-nel, 30-cal vagy 20-szal szabad csak menni?

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség#Elérhetőségek

További jó térképezést!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-04 11:49:28+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13041618212/history has maxspeed = 0 mph that was added in this edit
what maxspeed=0 mph is supposed to mean? If moving for vehicles (or some of them) is not allowed, then maybe one of access tags should be used and maxspeed=0 is not needed?
salisburymistake (2025-08-04 15:45:42+00:00): Good call. Corrected.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-01 16:30:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892210368
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1419194375

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rab (2025-08-01 16:39:56+00:00): less than 1 m wide.
Should not be tagged as "unclassified".
Also it has no connection to the higher road network
user_5359 (2025-08-11 10:06:57+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Da Du den Knoten von H&M beinahe deckungsgleich mit den Knoten von Völk gesetzt hast, möchte ich Dich auf den Hinweis https://www.osm.org/note/4887168 aufmerksam machen! Existiert das Geschäft noch?
Bobbi123 (2025-08-05 12:17:40+00:00): Eine Frage: Was hat die Straße zwischen Ebersbach und St2243 in Nordbayern mit Seefahrern und Elbe-Nordsee zu tun?
Liqid1010 (2025-08-03 19:44:24+00:00): Tie obdlzniky s krovim pri elektrickovej zastavke namestie osloboditelov a hned vedla vystavby polyfunkcneho domu sa preco nedotykaju chodnika? Preco chodnik nie je aj medzi tymito obdlznikami (na východ od chodníka)?
Rick Richards (2025-08-04 15:58:43+00:00): Update som zapracoval v novom changesete: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169964320 vďaka za tip na zlepšenie
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-01 17:01:03+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, usuń addr:place i zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, pozostaw tylko addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892210368
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1419194375

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
frydzio (2025-08-01 21:06:10+00:00): Why did you add those ways again? I explained you in other changeset that they were temporary ways used during construction of tram line and construction has been finished few weeks ago so no aerial images has those changes.
𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚟𝚎𝚗 (2025-08-02 11:42:24+00:00): okay okay. that was my stupid mistake, sorry, now i understand
gurglypipe (2025-08-01 17:15:38+00:00): Why are you deleting bothies? Please stop now.
user_23120382 (2025-08-01 17:22:08+00:00): I'm deleting PRIVATE bothies, not MBA ones. Do you think the estates want them published? (if that was the case they'd let the MBA look after them).
gurglypipe (2025-08-01 17:31:35+00:00): In changeset 169828708 you deleted Shenavall Bothy, which is on the MBA website. In 169828646 you deleted an emergency shelter which is open to all. In 169827499 you deleted another bothy listed on the MBA website.

Even if OSM was curated to the desires of landowners and estate owners, these things are going to be mapped sooner or later, so the only approach is to make sure their access restrictions are tagged appropriately (i.e. add access=private if they are actually private), not to delete them.
future.

Please also provide a useful description for your changesets. This is a collaborative project, other people need to know your reasoning for making changes. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

I’ve reverted all your changes so far. Please do not delete any more bothies. If tagging is missing/incorrect on private ones then please fix that on a case-by-case basis. The wiki is a good help for appropriate tagging: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dwilderness_hut
user_23120382 (2025-08-01 17:48:18+00:00): I'm sure your reckless opinion would change if it was your building getting trashed on a regular basis. Guess you could always contact the estates and see if they approve? (we both know that won't happen). Point proven.
gurglypipe (2025-08-01 18:11:46+00:00): I hate the fact that people trash bothies, but the information about their locations is public and has been for a long time (each MBA bothy has its own map on the MBA website, for example). Social media is probably more to blame for people trashing them than them being mapped on OSM.

If you’re trying to stop bothies being trashed by removing them from one map, that’s not going to work. That horse has bolted years ago and the stable door is broken.
Taya_S (2025-08-01 18:34:33+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18510
SekeRob (2025-08-01 17:10:56+00:00): Provisionally mapped based on circled cycle trace and photos. Could soon be better positioned as the area has high visit grade of Strava riders.
perusluku (2025-08-02 08:35:07+00:00): Hello, this restaurant already exist. Organic Maps might no be updated it yet. I deleted the duplicate node.
mueschel (2025-08-03 11:53:39+00:00): Hallo,
bitte verwende OSM nicht als Ersatz für eine Gallerie. 30 einzelne Fotos an einem Weg sind zu viel.
Wenn die Kunstwerke erfasst werden sollen, erstelle doch jeweils einen einzelnen Node an der passenden Stelle.
m_fuhrmann (2025-08-03 14:34:25+00:00): Einer übertreibt immer. Diesmal ich :joy: Sorry. Dachte das wäre so in Ordnung und der Gedanke war, dass man mit einem Frontend,  hoffentlich bald mal, Google Maps ähnlich einen POI, bzw dessen Bilder anschauen kann.
Aber klar, ich kann diese entfernen. Sie liegen sowieso auf Panoramax und es gibt Objekte für jeden Baum mit dem passenden Bild.
Ich gebe hier Bescheid, wenn es gefixt ist.
m_fuhrmann (2025-08-03 18:05:59+00:00): Fixed. Nun ist nur noch eins drin.
grzegorz75jan (2025-08-03 18:28:12+00:00): Pastwisko, łąkę to masz może koło siebie. W lesie się trafiają ale przedobrzyłeś. To wygląda na łąki https://postimg.cc/gallery/nMt0jx2
Porównywałeś aktualne orto z starszymi ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169919983
user_5359 (2025-08-02 10:13:42+00:00): Hello! What is the difference between the keys gtfs:FRE-BRE-TUDBUS:stop_name (4 times) and gtfs:FR-BRE-TILT:stop_name (268 times)?
mga_geo (2025-08-04 18:52:04+00:00): Un arrêt de bus peut être utilisé par plusieurs réseaux. Chaque réseau a un ID et un name de configuré pour cet arrêt. Ces données figurent dans le gtfs du réseau, la clé comporte une référence à ce gtfs cf ptna.
gurglypipe (2025-08-01 17:32:09+00:00): See discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169829036
gurglypipe (2025-08-01 17:32:13+00:00): See discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169829036
ChrissW-R1 (2025-08-08 22:11:13+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/4899788
Taya_S (2025-08-01 18:32:24+00:00): Restored wilderness hut DWG Ticket#2025080110000294

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169832924
Taya_S (2025-08-01 18:33:00+00:00): Restored railway line DWG Ticket#2025080110000294

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169832951
rskedgell (2025-08-08 05:36:58+00:00): The Greenway is owned by Thames Water and is not a public right of way or a highway maintained at public expense. That's why access is tagged as permissive rather than designated. Unless you have an OSM-compatible source showing that a legal right of way exists, please revert. Thanks.
Adam Edwards (2025-08-09 10:08:54+00:00): Apologies.  Changed back as requested.
rskedgell (2025-08-10 08:49:15+00:00): No problem.

There are a few places like this where we have normal cycle route signage, but which go across private land. Although it's unlikely the landowners would just revoke access, they could lock the gates without needing a traffic order and users wouldn't have any recourse.

At the other end of The Greenway, the road works on High Street have a TTRO (temporary traffic regulation order), but as far as I can tell the related closure on The Greenway itself doesn't.
custodiankeyy (2025-08-01 20:58:04+00:00): Lütfen yolları kısaltma olmadan ekleyin.
VLD549 (2025-10-04 06:35:40+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. Could you provide a link of some sort that shows it to be Stationsplantsoen? I can't seem to find it.
Thank you!
Adam Franco (2025-10-14 02:58:46+00:00): Please be a bit more careful mapping buildings. You mapped piles of logs, cars, and garden beds as buildings.
Adam Franco (2025-10-14 03:23:02+00:00): Also, please square the buildings with the "Q" shortcut.
joost schouppe (2025-08-04 09:27:32+00:00): Je hebt hier een nieuwe outline voor Castle Club gemaakt. Probeer er op te letten dat je op die manier geen dubbels veroorzaakt. Ik heb nu al de tags van de "oude" castle club naar je nieuwe verplaatst. Op die manier is er maar één Castle Club ipv twee.
Tom Ameye (2025-08-04 13:14:15+00:00): thx!
trial (2025-12-23 09:40:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13031778301 : crèche en extérieur ? J'ai des doutes^^
https://lescrechesdeal.com/creche-de-kervignac-2/ ?
Lisapple (2025-12-23 17:07:14+00:00): Bien vu! le bâtiment est trop récent pour être dans le Registre des Bâtiments, que j'utilise en général pour ajouter les buidlings manquants.
Mais bon, en cette saison, je vais faire un effort pour ajouter un toit à ces bambins.
trial (2025-12-23 20:44:21+00:00): En cette saison, il y a des crêches un peu partout. capacity=1 plus un âne et un bœuf je crois^^.
Filip009 (2025-08-02 12:27:59+00:00): Super zmeny, len tak ďalej :)
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-01 18:20:52+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/766557273

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
matheusgomesms (2025-08-04 15:25:24+00:00): Oi Daylton, tudo bem?

Trabalho fantástico em Sapezal, muito bom!

Posso dar uma sugestão? A gente, ao mapear, tenta não conectar nada às vias (exemplo que eu editei agora: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1419238214/history).

Então, deixa os parques, quadras, bairros etc conectados entre si (quando correto), mas não conectados à via, tudo bem?

Assim fica mais fácil de fazer a manutenção dessas áreas posteriormente!

Qualquer dúvida é só falar!

Att,
Matheus
Myazyk (2025-08-03 12:30:06+00:00): А чо та хата така крива?
custodiankeyy (2025-08-01 21:11:09+00:00): Merhaba, belirtilen bölgeyi hem hastane hem okul olarak işaretlemişsiniz. Orası artık okul mu oldu? Etiket farklılığından dolayı geri alıyorum.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169838131
rhhs (2025-08-15 17:57:35+00:00): Hi! Because I'm using StreetComplete, and it has a quest asking whether trees are broadleaved or needleleaved, I see a lot of your work on my surveys. Apart from the question how useful it is to map trees in a park, I noticed that there are a lot of inaccuracies in your mapping: many times trees are in the wrong place, not all trees are mapped, sometimes what looks like one tree on areal images are really several trees, and sometimes what looks like a tree is better mapped as natural=shrub. Very often when SC asks me if a tree is needle-leaved or broadleaved, I can't determine which tree I should look at. So please consider when mapping trees if you are not introducing many errors on the map... not mapping something is better than mapping it wrong, I think. Maybe just tagging an area as leisure=park is often the best option?
Marc_ch (2025-08-02 18:43:49+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourrriez-vous ajouter l'a source réelle dans le champs source ?
la description parle de GWR mais le champs source renseigne des imageries sat.
Par ailleurs il n'existe pas de ville ni village Dompierre FR.
le village s'appelle Dompierre.
FR est l'abréviation du canton et non le nom du village.
Salutations,
Marc
Wikilux (2025-08-03 11:12:40+00:00): Voilà la source pour Dompierre FR
https://map.geo.admin.ch/#/map?lang=fr&center=2565788.09,1189082.56&z=10&topic=ech&layers=ch.bfs.gebaeude_wohnungs_register;ch.swisstopo.amtliches-strassenverzeichnis&bgLayer=ch.swisstopo.pixelkarte-farbe&featureInfo=tooltip&catalogNodes=ech,457,491
Dompierre n'existe pas, mais Dompierre FR et Dompierre VD. C'est important en cas d'urgence par exemple. La même chose pour Ollon, Mézières etc.
Salutations,
Wikilux
Marc_ch (2025-08-03 13:01:09+00:00): Ce qui est important pour osm :
- utiliseer des données avec une licence valide, le site en question ne l'est pas.
- en cas de conflit entre 2 sources, c'est le terrain qui prime puis la connaissance locale.
hierr j'ai été à Dompierre. en aucun cas personne n'a dit qu'on se connait rerndez-vous à Dompierre FR, l'affiche communale, le site communale ne parle pas non plus de Dompierre FR.
le fait qu'un rendu ou une donnée décide de post-fixer une localité avec l'abréviation du canton ne regarde qu'eux.
Salutations,
Marc
Marc_ch (2025-08-03 13:03:24+00:00): Et pour l'excuse des urgences, l'information de l'abréviation du canton est dans osm. il y a aussi official_name qui pour l'annecdote contient une (), comme ca c'est vraiement pas un nom mais un suffixe qui varie d'une source à l'autre
Marc_ch (2025-08-03 13:05:32+00:00): En regardant le changeset un peu plus en détail, je me demande bien comment tu as fait pour voir sur l'imagerie satellite si un panneau "privé" est encore présent ou a été retiré https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526591735/history
j'imagine que c'est à nouveau l'utilisation d'une source avec donnée non compatible avec openstreetmap (le cadastre frobourrgeois n'a hélas pas une licence valide)
silversurfer83 (2025-08-01 21:13:47+00:00): Hi :)

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht.

Für andere wären Quellenangaben und Details zur Baustelle hilfreich. Damit können wir wesentlich besser einschätzen, ob das passt, was du gemacht hast.

Grundsätzlich kann ich sagen, dass ich die Konstruktion von "construction:maxspeed=*" noch nie gesehen habe. 

Wenn du mehr Details hast, gerne mal melden.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169833640
Joseph R P (2025-10-19 18:39:22+00:00): Hello. When mapping roads, please remember to use the fully-expanded prefixes and suffixes of the street's name rather than one in abbreviated form for consistency with OpenStreetMap's naming format. For example, use 'North' rather than 'N', and 'Lane' and 'Road' instead of 'Ln' and 'Rd'. 

Additionally, roads should be tagged based on their real-world usage, consistent with the tags of other nearby roads. In this case, these roads should be tagged as highway=residential rather than highway=primary, which would imply these roads are a major highway rather than a simply residential street. 

Thanks!
silversurfer83 (2025-08-01 21:15:10+00:00): Hi

ich glaube du hast mich falsch verstanden. Wir brauchen keine Relation, wenn wir nur ein Mitglied haben. Daher hätte es gereicht, wenn du den tag "type=boundary" entfernt hättest.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169834132
Paweł_M (2025-08-01 19:28:38+00:00): Sam dodałem ten hydrant 9 miesięcy temu, bo nabrałem się na napis "hydrant" na pokrywie. Widać trzeba było ją otworzyć i sprawdzić czy jest otwór ja słupek ;)
Paweł_M (2025-08-01 19:42:19+00:00): PS. co do tego "W innym miejscu Rudnika jest to samo.", to tego drugiego miejsca nie oznaczyłem. Ale to ono zasiało mi ziarno niepewności co do tego. Pozostałe oznaczone przeze mnie podziemne hydranty są potwierdzone przez sieć wodociągową geoportalu
Luzandro (2025-08-02 04:26:03+00:00): Hi,

I've reverted your change of the bus route: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/14016091
pyrog (2025-08-17 08:48:36+00:00): Bonjour,

L'itinéraire du réseau contient une limite administrative.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19415623#map=15/45.66649/6.39769&layers=PN

Je corrige.

Cordialement,
Yves — Groupe OSM Plein Air
Szymiii (2025-08-04 16:32:47+00:00): sftp://gddkia_przetargi@ftp.gddkia.gov.pl/O_Poznan_przetargi
Nzau (2026-02-28 21:04:02+00:00): Salut Cleoramx1,

Je vois que tu as ajouté pas mal d'infos sur différents chemins agricoles (highway=track).

Le souci c'est que certains tags ne sont pas obligatoires, et déjà implicites.
Par exemple, bicycle=* peut rester vide. Sinon cela peut déboussoler les GPS vélo qui nous font passer par des chemins plus que complexes...

https://api.panoramax.xyz/?focus=pic&map=17/49.328052/1.126607&pic=877cafe0-f088-4266-aa8e-69102d2bbb3c&seq=8bdeba55-b560-4f2c-9652-c31e31aed073&speed=250&theme=default&users=0a5d5370-cc2c-426e-bef7-b9bda806062b&xyz=77.00/0.00/30
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/548687045/history

Au plaisir d'échanger,
Enzo
custodiankeyy (2025-08-01 21:13:06+00:00): Belirtilen bölgede bir park gözükmemekte. Değişikliği geri alıyorum.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169838205
Glassman (2025-08-02 22:19:20+00:00): #TIP: Instead of deleting and then adding the feature back, just adjust the geometry and tags to save the history of a feature
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169835919
AndyB_66 (2025-09-10 17:50:33+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
aaronq227 (2025-08-08 14:21:50+00:00): Hi Արման, 

I noticed you recently reclassified trunk ways to motorway in a couple of changesets in Armenia (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169836350, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169836954). The motorway classification is generally reserved for roads with controlled access that exclude direct connections to service roads or driveways (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway). In imagery, at-grade junctions are visible near https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013310679 that connect to residential neighborhoods and driveways, which indicates trunk may be a more appropriate classification. Based on this information, would you be open to reclassifying these segments back to trunk?

Thanks for your time, and I look forward to hearing from you.
CAM-Gerlach (2025-08-02 09:51:52+00:00): Hey, thanks for adding sidewalks! Quick tip: when you've gone to the work of adding separate sidewalks like this, don't forget to add the `sidewalk:<left/right/both>=separate/no` tags on their respective streets, so they get properly tagged and picked up as such per approved OSM practice as well as accepted local convention. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169836414
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-06 10:38:18+00:00): Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4895091 ?
citrula (2025-08-01 20:55:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. This looks good, but the direction=90 you added is pointed in the opposite direction of traffic - did you perhaps mean to point it the other way?
a_bro (2025-08-01 21:35:37+00:00): Thank you for the review. The camera is pointing east. I believe that is correct for 90 clockwise degrees.
Alexmol (2025-08-01 20:55:54+00:00): Actualização de postos de carregamento
Relatos/Survey de utilizadores de veículos eléctricos nos sites clubelectricos.com, na App Miio e no site/App Electromaps. Dados abertos da Mobi.E
maro21 (2025-08-02 17:14:34+00:00): You moved trees to the middle of an ocean, please correct.
mmd (2025-08-03 11:18:26+00:00): Can you please switch over to the dev instance at https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org to test your software https://github.com/mdornseif/osm-treewarden while it's still in development?
Kees 59 (2025-08-09 13:21:23+00:00): Hi,
on The Ampleforth you have used the key 'dhm_id' (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:dhm_id). This is a reference intended to be used for windmills as a key to find the windmill on a specific site. Typo maybe?
After a little bit of looking around I cam by 'fhrs:id' (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fhrs:id). Might this be what is needed?

As a side note: The website link was not working, I managed to find another one and have updated.
ist410 (2025-08-10 18:01:05+00:00): Thank you so much for your comment! You are right, I fixed this moment