piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MagSungam (2024-03-19 15:11:02+00:00): Ich lösche nicht "einfach" Jahrelange Arbeit. Ich entferne vor allem TAGs, zu denen und kein Mensch vorher gefragt hat ob wir dir da drin haben wollen. Außerdem TAGs bei denen das OSM WiKi eindeutig sagt das sie nichts im öffentlichen OSM zu  suchen haben. Ebenso müssen dort auch keine privaten Wohnmobile gemapped werden. Ich finde an dieser Stelle ist genug darüber diskutiert worden. Bitte mache doch im Forum eine Thread dazu auf wenn es noch nicht reicht. 
Mich nach nachweisen zu fragen finde ich auch etwas Merkwürdig aber vielleicht machst du den Anfang aber bitte mit Adresse  damit ich schauen kann ob Klo, Dusche und Küche auch eingezeichnet ist. ;-)
Map-Peter (2024-03-20 00:31:03+00:00): Wow ... du hast damit vier von vier meiner Fragen nicht beantwortet(!) Versuche es nochmal.
 
Ach, du "löscht" nicht einfach, sondern "entfernst" ...  
Das macht keinen Unterschied.  
 
Du hast hier mehr als nur ein paar taggs entfernt.
 
Wir bei OSM - dazu gehörst auch du - fragen grundsätzlich keine Eigentümer ob etwas gemappt werden darf. Wieso(?) Denke diesen Gedanken mal bis zum Ende, dann weißt du wieso.
 
Anscheinend ist dir entgangen, das 99% (müssten 100% sein, aber Menschen sind nunmal keine Maschinen) der Objekte auf diesem Privatgelände mit access=private getaggt sind.
 
Hast du mal 1-2 (gerne auch mehr) Bsp. zu "private Wohnmobilen gemapped" auf auf diesem Privatgelände?
 
Das darfst du finden wie du willst, aber du solltest grundsätzlich Fragen zu deinem Mapping beantworten und immer kompromissbereit sein - das ist ein Grundpfeiler von OSM.
 
Zudem habe ich meine Bedenken zu deiner Legitimation, als Eigentümer dieses Privatgeländes Lösch-/Änderungs-Forderungen an OSM zu stellen, begründet.
 
Behaupten kann das quasi Jeder, aber wenn du, wie du sagst, soo tief im Eigentümer-e.V. involviert bist, gibt es mehrere Möglichkeiten "deiner Legitimation zu diesem Thema" und das ohne deine persönlichen Daten preiszugeben.
 
Was haben meine persönlichen Daten hiermit zu tun(?)  
Wohnst du etwa auf diesem Privatgelände und habe ich dein "Klo, Dusche und Küche" gemappt?
MagSungam (2024-03-20 17:50:55+00:00): Bitte mache doch eine Thread im Forum auf.
Map-Peter (2024-03-20 23:13:53+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/festival-gelande-fusion-welches-mapping-ist-dort-ok-bzw-nicht-ok/110759
VLD549 (2024-03-30 07:50:41+00:00): Hi, could you provide a link where the name change from Sint-Barbarakapel to Sint-Barbarakapel van Sint-Margareta-ommegang  comes from?
I can't seem to find it.

Thank you!
Romaine2 (2024-03-30 13:09:22+00:00): The chapels are not standing on their own but are part of the Sint-Margareta-ommegang. See https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sint-Margareta-ommegang
I thought it would be good to indicate this somehow, and I found no other method than mentioning in the name field. If you think it is not a good idea I can remove it from their names.
VLD549 (2024-04-04 13:19:13+00:00): I understand your reasoning. Well, since the ommegang passes by 5 chapels, I guess it's ok. :)
Thank you!
GeorgeKaplan (2024-09-08 07:16:18+00:00): Bonjour, est-ce que resort n'est pas plus adapté que camping pour ce village ?
JIDB (2024-09-08 19:48:58+00:00): La description de leisure=resort ne me semble pas non plus parfaitement correspondre. Mais c'est peut-être un peu mieux que camping.
tordans (2024-03-14 15:32:51+00:00): Hallo beim ADFC, ich vermute bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130861264 ist etwas falsch gelaufen. Da hatte vor wenigen Tagen jemand den separat geführten Radweg an der Straße vermerkt aber jetzt steht hier, dass an beiden Seiten kein Radweg ist. 
Ist der separate Weg nur ein Fußweg + Fahrrad frei? Dann müssten wir den auch noch updaten (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40478954#map=15/52.9459/12.3576)

VG und frohes Mappen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148604271
dentonny (2024-07-15 20:22:30+00:00): hey,

wat bedoel je hiermee juist?
GR-menneke (2024-07-16 09:34:45+00:00): Dag,

Ik bedoel er mee dat er geen toegangsbeperking is aangeduid d.m.v. verkeersborden. Dus fietsers, ruiters, ... mogen er volgens mij allemaal door.
dentonny (2024-07-16 10:47:33+00:00): Daar dienen access tags toch voor? Fietsers had ik al erbij staan. 
Ruiters niet, die had ik er idd niet tussenstaan.

Voor de rest is mijn mening dat een highway wordt gekozen op basis van hoe iets eruit ziet in de eerste plaats. En nadien kan men access tags toevoegen. 
Maar meningen kunnen altijd verschillen natuurlijk op OSM :)
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-28 01:38:14+00:00): source?
lankapuhelin (2025-08-10 16:28:57+00:00): Tähän wayhyn https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1262260280 oli tullut melkoinen mutka. Fiksailen sen nyt.
citrula (2024-03-14 04:05:29+00:00): Please draw the actual outline of the buildings, not the yard/plot. Also, please don't attach them to each other unless the buildings are actually attached. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148604936
MxxCon (2024-03-17 05:01:24+00:00): Hello.
Why did you delete this apparently legitimate business?
Valid biz listings on OSM is not advertisement...
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148604974
MxxCon (2024-03-17 05:02:18+00:00): Once again you deleted a legitimate biz poi...
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148605291
damianeue (2024-03-13 17:42:17+00:00): about the cemetery addresses: they are all visible from Via Palmiro Togliatti. I didn't add addr:street tag since I'm not sure what street they refer to (the name is written on the plaques but I haven't had the chance to walk and read what's written on them)
SekeRob (2024-03-14 07:50:13+00:00): Hi,
Your worst roundabout layout yet
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148605588 Starts to look more and more like google style, boxcar driving. You also created several roundabout 'shortcuts' which are a router problem, no telling who's got right of way.. Flagged by multiple QA progs.
SekeRob (2024-03-14 13:42:17+00:00): PS On this CS there's also a series of housenumbers you put on the cemetery outline, a novelty to me, without street name. OSM wants addr:street 

ciao
damianeue (2024-03-14 18:23:11+00:00): I've explained why I didn't add addr:street, if you don't read it's not my problem.
Ciao
SekeRob (2024-03-15 08:57:05+00:00): And that goes for the post office as well ?
damianeue (2024-03-15 09:33:28+00:00): POIs shouldn't have addr:* tags, only address nodes
SekeRob (2024-03-15 10:55:33+00:00): You put it there... https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11728064512 sans addr:street

Shop POI on first floor, no address, no addr:floor too. Where's that documented?
damianeue (2024-03-15 11:56:20+00:00): On #11728064512 I've tagged the address node, it's a plaque visible from the street. Again, also on that one the streetname is written on it, but I couldn't read it since I was in a car.
Also: #11728064512 I'm sure is referred to Via Palmiro Togliatti. But it looks strange to me that the numbers I've tagged on the cemetery are all sequential and non-alternated (as if it was a square). That's one other thing that made me decide to not add the addr:street tag.

I know how to do this. I do what I can and what I know for sure. I do what I can, at my best. If there's something missing I will fix it when I can, or if someone else is faster than me it's ok. Do you want to help or to complain?
SekeRob (2024-03-17 11:09:39+00:00): 1) civ 3-14 relate to the address of the cemetery, not Togliatti. Added footway from parking to nr 7. There's steep stairs there and a board with 3 seasons opening hours. Also there's bollards there to prevent cars going in to drive to nr 3-6.
2) The post office stretch is 2 to 14 with 10+10 sub on concrete pillar right front of post office + 12+12b, building further down.
3) completed a turn restr. where via was missing and smoothed some roundabout flare shapes.
4) Added roles to the Togliatti relation.
JOSM warned for a bunch more... next time.
SekeRob (2024-03-17 11:19:15+00:00): PS The civ.nr shields say Città di Montesilvano above. Many villages in the area only print their names on civ.nr shields, never a streetname. In Villa Raspa they make sure you know you're in Spoltore :O)
SekeRob (2024-03-19 16:27:58+00:00): So, after second survey not interrupted by rain, civ 2 thru 12d mapped, brand new shields, but not from yesterday, different model with street name below, the shield for 1 is gone at post office, left over the mail drop box (photo in cloud), don't ask me when that happened but suspect same time as the new 2-12d series were placed. There's 2x 10, Poste Italiane web site says theirs is 10A (10a per Istat dictate). The cemetery seen all from 1 through 18 except 2 and 15. A florist told those were just gate numbers for the visitors (presume emergency services too). The cemetery is officially at Chiarini 1 (there's a cemetery website "Find A Grave" even giving the Cemetery ID: 2737452, civ number 1 is at the main gate. Strictly speaking 16,17,18 are physically on Bruno Madonna. 3-14 east side, I'd say Chiarini as it's on a path extension from the main gate and parking with the noted bollards.

Oh, and opening hours, found 3 boards, 3 different times, the one on nr7 does not mention October. covers Apr-May, Jun-Sep, Nov-Mar. Different hours per season.
damianeue (2024-03-19 19:17:10+00:00): Hi SekeRob, I really want to thank you for your edits in the area. I just started a new job so I couldn't keep up with your changesets, but thank you so much. As you've seen, the cemetery civic numbers (or maybe should we say ref=* in this case since it looks like a progressive numeration that doesn't follow the other streets' numeration? Also, I wasn't even aware of Bruno Madonna entrances, never been on that street) weren't referring to Togliatti, so I can say that after all I wasn't wrong avoiding to add addr:street.
The rain was a big impeding for me, I didn't take many notes while passing there by car (like, I remember seeing 2-12d series but I wasn't sure of their position).
Again, thanks for adding a lot of new details.
MxxCon (2024-03-17 05:05:16+00:00): Why did you delete nysgissam:nysaddresspointid tag here?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148605647
MarcoR (2024-03-19 13:14:42+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap!

"da qui in poi" in che direzione? Cosa è che blocca il passaggio?

Aggiungere i nomi ai nodi non è il modo corretto di mappare un oggetto; la prossima volta ti consiglierei di aggiungere semplicemente delle note alla mappa: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Note#Aggiungere_una_nota

Buon mapping,
Marco
elmozzo (2024-04-01 00:16:28+00:00): grazie!
whammo (2024-05-19 12:39:33+00:00): Hi DarkDays. I see you've done a lot of these website imports. Is this documented anywhere? What is the source you're using?
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-14 20:20:19+00:00): Bad form to use OSM to promote homophobia.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148605677
CjMalone (2024-11-14 21:08:54+00:00): Are you OK? Do you need a health care professional calling?
Allison P (2024-11-14 22:58:13+00:00): How does this edit promote homophobia?
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-16 18:00:52+00:00): Chick-fil-A gives a lot, lot of money and uses lobbyists to promote homophobia to a degree that they're pretty synonymous.
Allison P (2024-11-16 19:08:44+00:00): I don't think mapping constitutes endorsement. If it does, I've got a lot of introspection to do about mapping all the cookie-cutter subdivisions in my hometown.
wireguy (2024-03-14 18:15:43+00:00): Jack, 
Careful, this change broke the Skippack boundary.   Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148655664
flohoff (2024-03-13 23:01:32+00:00): Feedback aus dem Routing - ist wieder heile d.h. geht da durch

Rot alt - Grün neu

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=691866,740150
eggie (2024-03-13 18:45:42+00:00): Dag Nikkle Ik zie hier schade aan routerelaties.

Je kunt routerelatie niet bewerken met editor iD.

    L42-L45 (10757638), v3
    WNW IJsseldelta - Zandhove -gele route (10757642), v5

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-03-13 18:50:46+00:00): Wanneer een pad niet zou bestaan dat kan, maar als er een wandelroute over heen loopt dan zul je toch moeten uitzoeken hoe die dan wel loopt.
Nu zitten er gaten in.
eggie (2024-03-13 18:56:47+00:00): Twee wandelroutes hersteld en omgelegd om het Scoutingterrein.
eggie (2024-03-13 19:08:38+00:00): https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=17.0/52.4735/6.1133
Interswd (2024-06-27 17:21:52+00:00): To jest Muzeum górnicze, raczej ciężko oznaczać jako "park rozrywki".
gscholz (2024-03-14 06:36:38+00:00): Hi ASDASDADDASDASDASDASD,
this changeset has created a lot of errors regarding self intersecting ways:


https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-65.58873&lat=-27.09134&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148607064

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
GOwin (2024-03-19 08:44:29+00:00): This is awesome! Thank you for adding details and helping improve the map of your favorite neighborhood. Sharing local knowledge is the best kind of mapping. :)

If you're keen to keep in touch with local mappers, there are a number of  community channels you can try: https://osm.org/wiki/PH

Glad to see you're still mapping, and I hope you're having fun.
archie (2024-03-13 18:31:22+00:00): Din changeset har reverterats. Anledningen till detta är att det här gäller allemansrätten. Stigen går långt från bebyggelse, så de inskränkningar i allemansrätten som finns för dessa situationer är inte förhanden. Även den omständigheten att det är privat  mark som stigen går över ändrar inte att man får använda stigen enligt den i Sverige gällande allemansrätten.
eggie (2024-03-13 20:57:25+00:00): En er  is weer een routerelaties stuk.. Je kunt geen routes bewerken met editor iD Dat kan alleen met josm.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-03-13 21:00:46+00:00): Routerelatie weer hersteld Van Schaikpad. Dubbel ingetekende wegen.
Frog23 (2024-03-13 19:46:08+00:00): Thanks fellow Nebula subscriber.
moanos (2024-03-13 19:48:43+00:00): I hope this doesn't count as spoiler 😅
Lezurex (2024-03-13 22:15:02+00:00): Hi moanos,

This playground doesn't seem that public to me. It is located inside a residential development, which mostly means it's meant for the residents of said development and not for the public (like "anyone from anywhere"). Therefore, I'd argue access=all is wrong here.

Anyway, thanks for your contribution, fellow JetLag viewer :D

Oh, and please don't forget to rectify your edits in iD by pressing Q.
Rovastar (2024-03-20 16:48:58+00:00): Haha. Watching on youtube. I did wonder if it was on OSM when they did hide and seek.
rohieb (2026-01-11 21:30:04+00:00): For the record, when we went there last summer, there was no sign or anything on the playground or on the footpaths there prohibiting access to it, so it should be accessible to the public.
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-18 06:15:22+00:00): Вы удалили теги автостоянки и проставили building=apartments. Откуда у вас такая информация?
AlexandrPS (2024-03-13 18:30:56+00:00): Изменил адреса, а не границу. Очепятка
totera (2024-04-19 23:58:57+00:00): Ciao f_gonella, perché abbassare la classificazione della SS681 che ha due carreggiate da due corsie l'una quando su OSM usiamo trunk anche per strade che hanno un livello di servizio inferiore?
Inoltre, potresti usare dei commenti significativi invece di ripetere sempre "Piccole sistemazioni"? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments)
gscholz (2024-03-15 07:56:39+00:00): Hi ASDASDADDASDASDASDASD,
your recent changesets have created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-65.58976&lat=-27.09350&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148607958

Can you please fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about how to edit multipolygones properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon_Examples

Kind regards
Guido
ASDASDADDASDASDASDASD (2024-03-15 19:30:22+00:00): Let me know if it fixed now
Cheers
-ASDASDADDASDASDASDASD
gscholz (2024-03-16 06:20:23+00:00): Hi ASDASDADDASDASDASDASD, 
thanks for your quick response, seems to be fixed now.
Guido
silversurfer83 (2024-03-14 02:24:08+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OSM :)

Danke, dass du hilfst die Karte aktuell zu halten.

Du hast hier einen Zufahrtsweg verkürzt und an dessen Stelle eine Fläche mit ähnlichen Eigenschaften erstellt. Diese Fläche an sich zu erstellen ist nicht falsch, sieh benötigt jedoch passende Eigenschaften (ein "area:" vor dem "highway" zum Beispiel) da es sonst aussieht als würde der Weg einfach einen Kreis beschreiben.
Außerdem ist das Routing über Flächen leider noch ein nicht triviales Problem, weshalb wir durch Verkehrsflächen weiterhin auch Linien (ways) mit den Eigenschaften des Weges legen, damit die Software auch weiß, wo es lang geht.
Du kannst dir ja mal ansehen, wie ich das gemacht habe:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1262285726

Bei Fragen hilft unser Wiki auch immer weiter oder du wendest dich an die community im Forum unter c.osm.org oder guckst in einer der vielen Chatgruppen vorbei:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Contact_channels
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a

happy mapping
silversurfer83
MxxCon (2024-03-17 04:52:00+00:00): Hello.
Please do NOT delete nycdoitt:bin=* tags!
They uniquely identify each building in NYC DOT's database which allows for metadata conflation and enrichment.
If you don't know what a tag does, please do not delete it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148608467
MxxCon (2024-03-17 05:12:11+00:00): Why did you delete description= tag here? This looks to be a perfectly legitimate, neutral tone description of the business.
Also why did you delete nysgissam:nysaddresspointid tag?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148608649
gscholz (2024-03-15 07:57:21+00:00): Hi ASDASDADDASDASDASDASD,
your recent changesets have created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-65.58976&lat=-27.09350&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148608651

Can you please fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about how to edit multipolygones properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon_Examples

Kind regards
Guido
MxxCon (2024-03-17 05:15:41+00:00): This is not a valid street name.
Why did you just delete amenity= instead of fixing it? Now this POI has no primary category.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148608822
Frans S (2024-03-15 09:16:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark. Please do not connect nodes of buildings to other buildings of features.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2024-03-15 09:22:24+00:00): Hi. Another remark.
Rectangular buildings need to be squared with the Q key when a building is still selected.
Best regards
gscholz (2024-03-15 07:56:50+00:00): Hi ASDASDADDASDASDASDASD,
your recent changesets have created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-65.58976&lat=-27.09350&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148608874

Can you please fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about how to edit multipolygones properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon_Examples

Kind regards
Guido
MxxCon (2024-03-17 05:20:22+00:00): Why did you delete all these legitimate tags?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:*
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:*
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148608935
MxxCon (2024-03-17 05:26:11+00:00): Why did you delete this biz POI?
It seems to be there.
Or at the very least, why did you not keep the address tags intact?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148608958
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-18 06:35:44+00:00): "лётчицы Веры Захаровой улица" - неверное написание. Надо исправить и в адресе, и на дороге.
silversurfer83 (2024-03-14 01:46:02+00:00): Moin jande75 :)

seit kurzem ist in dem von dir genutzten Editor (iD) auch die hessische Liegenschaftskarte (ALKIS) als Hintergrund verfügbar. Damit lassen sich Adressen auch aus der Ferne relativ gut ermitteln. Probiers mal aus :)

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148609142
Xvtn (2024-03-17 21:14:49+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review here, I looked over your changes. This is a simple one - no problems! Thanks for your contributions.
MxxCon (2024-03-17 05:27:16+00:00): Why did you delete description tag here?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148609691
MxxCon (2024-03-17 05:28:29+00:00): Street name tag is invalid here.
Why was it necessary merging this node with the building?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148609708
MxxCon (2024-03-17 05:29:31+00:00): Why did you delete operator= tag here?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148609728
BeaconOSM (2024-11-21 18:36:15+00:00): Misuse of operator tag
MxxCon (2024-11-21 21:12:10+00:00): How is it misuse if it lists who's the operator?
MxxCon (2024-03-18 01:21:55+00:00): Why did you delete payment tags here?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148609881
BeaconOSM (2024-11-21 18:35:41+00:00): Misuse of description tag for a business
MxxCon (2024-11-21 20:06:35+00:00): How is deleting accurate payment tags fixes "Misuse of description tag for a business"? 🤨
javbw (2024-03-26 02:10:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1262299537

Please do not map drains as tracks. 

Rice fields have irregulaur tracks and drains, so please be careful to properly map the tracks, and not the drains between the fields. 

This track is not contiguous.
muralito (2024-03-14 01:56:41+00:00): Hola. Las etiquetas place y landuse son independientes e indican cosas distintas. No solo no tenes porque borrar una para poner la otra, sino que si la informacion de landuse que habia anteriormente era correcta y la borraste, es un error a corregir.
Frans S (2024-03-20 18:00:21+00:00): Hi. About these mappings. 
Area mapping is not required on this project.
Just buildings, roads , waterways.
This is an urgent project. Please focus on the required objects.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148610422
MxxCon (2024-03-18 01:25:09+00:00): "Opens summer 2024" is an invalid feature name. Feature name must NOT be used as its description.
We have opening_date= tag, as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_date to indicate a date when a feature finishes construction or activates.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148610536