piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Patchanka (2023-03-13 18:42:29+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue  :-)
voici quelques liens utiles pour débuter sur OSM :

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques
(le wiki est la référence en ce qui concerne la manière de cartographier les éléments)

Les 10 cOSMandements : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/8/87/Les_10_cOSMandements.pdf

Le forum FR (N'hésitez pas à poser des questions) : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/

Concernant l'ajout des terrains de sport et des maisons, le nom est de trop (cf cOSMandement n°4) car "maison individuelle" ou "terrain de padel" ne sont pas de vrais noms, seulement des descriptions. Je les supprime donc.

bonne soirée
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-15 01:30:58+00:00): CS by Stewered12 hidden by DWG as spam
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-15 01:33:04+00:00): Sorry, that should be CC not CS!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-13 16:00:20+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być formatu XX-XXX, gdzie X oznacza cyfrę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1076029349

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
map per (2023-03-13 18:45:10+00:00): Wegen "Meine Änderungen überprüfen": Sieht alles gut aus, danke!
Frans S (2023-03-18 12:28:52+00:00): About highway tagging:

Please apply the rules described in this wiki
Most common taggings.
Rural areas : Unclassified,  track , path, service
Urban areas: unclassified, residential, path.


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133631964
moje_konto (2023-03-13 18:00:10+00:00): Znaczy by wytyczanie drogi lepiej działało? Może ten piasek przeszkadzał?

Jeśli tak, to raczej lepiej uaktualnić nawierzchnię, wygląda tak: https://i.imgur.com/saFEQGA.jpeg
Tomek | Yanosik (2023-03-14 09:49:59+00:00): Tak, dziękuję za przesłanie zdjęcia. Zaktualizowałem tag surface :)
Leo Slager (2023-03-17 22:42:51+00:00): oneway  op wethouder schoutenweg heb ik omgedraaid.
silversurfer83 (2023-03-13 16:43:16+00:00): Moin :)

Ich will dir nicht zu nahe treten, aber einige deiner Gebäude in dieser Änderung sehen aus, als hättest du vergessen, dass es die Taste "Q" gibt :)

Rein kosmetisch, meine Anmerkung

Cheers aus der Kreisstadt
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133632177
Galbinus (2023-03-14 13:00:16+00:00): In diesem Changeset habe ich meines Wissens genau zwei Gebäude neu eingetragen. Und das eine davon ist definitiv nicht rechtwinklig. 
Bei Gebäuden, die rechtwinklig sind, nutze ich normalerweise die Funktion, die diese Flächen rechtwinklig machen. Aber natürlich kann man immer noch irgendwas verbessern.
silversurfer83 (2023-03-14 13:23:04+00:00): Alles klar :)
SekeRob (2023-03-14 18:19:32+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto da OSM.

Puoi dirci cosa stavi facendo cancellando tutti questi contorni di aree agricole colorate in rosso?

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133632526

grazie
p2gconnecto (2023-03-14 18:35:23+00:00): Ciao SekeRob, i confini delle aree erano completamente sbagliati, le strade interne pure, così come i fabbricati. Sto, quindi, riassegnando le aree in base alla fotogrammetria più recente e alla conoscenza diretta della zona.
SekeRob (2023-03-14 19:30:24+00:00): Grazie per la tua rapida risposta, il prossimo change set scrivi cosa stai facendo in modo che i revisori possano capire cosa succede.

Sono venuto qui perché OSM Inspector segnala un'intersezione di un'area agricola.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=15.96899&lat=38.52238&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.65&overlays=intersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cways

Forse non hai finito di stendere quella bozza. Se è tutto lo spazio bianco rimasto, è facile da risolvere.

buona serata
mueschel (2023-03-26 17:07:58+00:00): Hi,
what is the meaning of "highest:pint"? This tag is not used in any other place.
Fantastic Fabian (2023-03-26 17:28:49+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for the correction. It is a typo. I meant to type highest:point. I already corrected it (#134145635).
mueschel (2023-03-26 17:32:42+00:00): And what is the meaning of that tag? You're the only one using it, and I don't find it in the Wiki.
Fantastic Fabian (2023-03-26 17:41:30+00:00): It is meant to help render indoor stairs. This way you can visualise which way the stairs go.
mueschel (2023-03-26 17:52:39+00:00): That would be tagged as incline=up or incline=down on the way.
Fantastic Fabian (2023-03-27 12:58:58+00:00): I found where I got it from in the wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Stairs_modelling, but the article lists both options. I will use incline in the future too.
mueschel (2023-03-27 16:10:32+00:00): You don't need this point-tag. It's not a tag that anybody added to any stairs up to now. I don't know how this short paragraph labeled "Roof direction" ended up in the wiki, but it doesn't describe anything discussed or established.
emersonveenstra (2023-03-14 11:24:01+00:00): Hi,

I think you have a typo in the voltage here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/941518024
som-tam (2023-04-12 09:12:52+00:00): Der way 256543371 hat keine Feature Tags, wird aber als Kindergarten beschrieben. Dieser ist allerdings schon als POI vorhanden. Außerdem überlappt der way mit dem des Friedhofs.
Geofreund1 (2023-04-12 14:41:21+00:00): Bitte selber korrigieren.
Danke
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-28 16:17:14+00:00): This is not a park, and has been removed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133632824
olo81 (2023-04-18 13:04:35+00:00): ta zmiana wyklucza się z innymi tagami, do poprawy:
maxspeed:hgv:conditional
Frans S (2023-03-13 17:58:29+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
About highway tagging:

Please apply the rules described in this wiki
Most common taggings.
Rural areas : Unclassified,  track , path, service
Urban areas: unclassified, residential, path.


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133632964
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-28 16:16:54+00:00): This is not a park, and has been removed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133633058
flohoff (2023-03-13 21:34:02+00:00): Moin,
deine changeset beschreibung passt für die changesets die ich gerade angesehen habe nicht so wirklich.

Wäre schön wenn du da genauer reinschreibst warum und was du änderst. 

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133633093
Frans S (2023-03-13 17:55:35+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Buildings ought to be tagged as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines. 

Each rectangular building ought to be squared with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133633171
Frans S (2023-03-13 17:54:42+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

About highway tagging:

Please apply the rules described in this wiki
Most common taggings.
Rural areas : Unclassified,  track , path, service
Urban areas: unclassified, residential, path.


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways
You tagged a rural road as 'residential. 'unclassified' is correct.
Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133633177
Frans S (2023-03-13 17:50:59+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Buildings ought to be tagged as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines. 

Each rectangular building ought to be squared with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133633178
Frans S (2023-03-13 17:52:27+00:00): Addition to my previous message.
Please take the time to map accurate. Your mappings are rather sloppy and follow the rooflines . No building is correct mapped.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133633178
Frans S (2023-03-13 17:49:59+00:00): Hello again.
Here you mapped a few walled compounds as a building. It is very good to see on the image that it are no buildings. ( search for a shadow which shows that the object is above groundlevel).
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133633188
Frans S (2023-03-13 17:20:32+00:00): Hello again. I reviewed this changeset as well.
You mapped  3 traces of ?? As buildings.
When it was a building, you should have noticed a shadow next to it, what proves it is a building.
The other building, I should say 2 buildings, rather complex, has not been squared.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133633208
map per (2023-03-13 18:35:35+00:00): Wegen "Meine Änderungen überprüfen": Die Kreuzung von Menzinger Straße und Nymphenburger-Biedersteiner Kanal sieht nicht gut aus: Du hast dort den Tunnel unter der Straße (1) in drei Teile aufgeteilt, bei zwei Teilen den Tunnel Tag gelöscht und eine Furt hinzugefügt.

Viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462192697
map per (2023-03-16 07:15:33+00:00): Habs korrigiert

Viele Grüße
map per
Frans S (2023-03-13 17:47:25+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Buildings ought to be tagged as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines. !!

Each rectangular building ought to be squared with the Q key, which you ignored.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133633246
Frans S (2023-03-13 16:58:23+00:00): Hello. Thanks for your contribution to this project.
Did you not read the instructions what to be mapped.?
Only buildings and roads. Nothing else.
You mapped and names a café. Are you joking ?
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133633285
Shriya Marla (2023-03-14 04:56:30+00:00): Hello! I am so sorry about that! When I was trying to do the tutorial one of the steps wasn’t working so one of the leaders suggested that I cancel the whole thing and restart. But when I did that it made me test an object to add so I just did the first thing I saw which was a cafe. Once I did it then it allowed me to go through the rest of the tutorial. But by the time I had figured the whole thing out the time was up and I couldn’t actually map a building. I am truly sorry about that, I was genuinely just trying the first thing that showed up because it made me test it. Again, I am very very sorry. 
Thank you
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-03-14 10:01:30+00:00): Danke! :-)
MxxCon (2023-03-14 06:19:32+00:00): Hello.
could you elaborate why did you delete this parking lot?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133633385
Paulish (2023-03-14 13:08:08+00:00): No more parking lot already two years.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133633385
wkdgs (2023-03-16 09:46:47+00:00): Hi,

can you add a "note=*" tag explaining that the "oneway=yes" was added because of the construction site? Otherwise other mappers cannot easily find that information when editing this part of the map.

A "check_date:oneway=*" might also be helpful, if you forget to remove the tag when the construction ends.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:note
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:check_date
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133633412
impiaaa (2023-03-14 16:03:50+00:00): Please save your changes before moving on to another area, and please keep HOT project changes within the area of the task.
Frans S (2023-03-13 17:41:00+00:00): Hello again.
Do you know that you tagged a "secundary highway "along an field ? instead of a track?
You also mapped a few traces without tagging them.
You also forgot to connect nodes a crossing road to each other. 
Please be more accurated
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133633452
Frans S (2023-03-13 17:36:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
About highway tagging:

Please apply the rules described in this wiki
Most common taggings.
Rural areas : Unclassified,  track , path, service
Urban areas: unclassified, residential, path.


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133633476
Frans S (2023-03-13 17:34:31+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A question. You adjusted a building, correct mapped by the previous mapper, and included the yard next to it. Please don't. Only buildings. no courtyards etc,
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133633485
Frans S (2023-03-13 17:27:23+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Buildings ought to be tagged as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines. 
Each rectangular building ought to be squared with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 




See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133633490
Frans S (2023-03-13 17:27:54+00:00): Addition to previous message..
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually. In 1 case, you mapped the rooms of a building under construction as 7 buildings.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133633490
Frans S (2023-03-13 17:14:26+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Buildings ought to be tagged as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Each rectangular building ought to be squared with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133633513
Frans S (2023-03-13 17:15:22+00:00): Hello again.
Did you not read the paragraph about mapping tracks in the instructions ?
No need to map this trace.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133633513
archpdx (2023-03-13 21:03:36+00:00): Hi,

Please note that everyone can see the changes you upload to OpenStreetMap. We generally do not map where individual people live because of privacy concerns (see https://wiki.osm.org/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information)

Also, please make sure to check your edits before uploading: it looks like you accidentally dragged nodes for these two roads:
* https://osm.org/way/407437354
* https://osm.org/way/136444841

In the future, please do use relevant changeset comments: '#hotosm-project-14311 #TürkiyeEQ060223 #Syria #OMHAP #MissingMaps' doesn't help other mappers understand what you are doing and isn't relevant to the changes made here. Read https://wiki.osm.org/Good_changeset_comments to see what makes a good changeset comment.
Frans S (2023-03-13 17:12:47+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Buildings ought to be tagged as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Each rectangular building ought to be squared with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133633529
Frans S (2023-03-13 17:11:19+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133633536
Frans S (2023-03-13 17:07:38+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
When you come across a wrongly tagged road, like here, please retag it.
About highway tagging:

Please apply the rules described in this wiki
Most common taggings.
Rural areas : Unclassified,  track , path, service
Urban areas: unclassified, residential, path.


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2023-03-13 17:44:54+00:00): Hello again. Please don't upload each single mapping if you are mapping on the same task. Collect them and upload them in 1 go.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133633808
gmar5 (2023-03-13 21:33:40+00:00): Hi. Why have you deleted the roads under constructions in the new residential development? The Bing image is out of date, if that's what you saw.
gmar5 (2023-03-13 21:36:51+00:00): You also deleted a cemetery. Please let me know if these were mistakes, and if you need help in reverting your changes.
Paul Clark DS (2023-03-13 21:50:36+00:00): Sorry yes these are mistakes, the bus stops were only removed for something we need to do and didnt realise this would update for everyone. Can you or tell me how to put this back to how it should be..
gmar5 (2023-03-14 11:23:27+00:00): I've reverted your changes, restoring things as they were. If you think some of the bus stops are not correct, you can edit them again.

Editing the map is to update and improve the data for everyone. If you need to do something for personal use only, you will need a different tool.
SekeRob (2023-03-13 17:26:20+00:00): There are 3 more zones left quart of forest area which need same procedure applied, probably reducing the forest Multipolygon memberships by 30 or more. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9065493
Tomorrow, maybe, if time allows.
silversurfer83 (2023-03-13 21:00:02+00:00): Hi
für das, was du hier versuchst hinzuzufügen haben wir das Kürzel POI (Point of Interst). Am besten machst du dafür wirklich einen eigenen Punkt innerhalb des Gebäudes und gibst diesem die passenden Eigenschaften. Beispiel office=lawyer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133634767
nyampire (2023-03-15 08:29:54+00:00): OSMへようこそ、編集をレビューしました。

とてもよく描けていると思います。
これからもぜひマッピングを続けてみてください。

Happy Mapping！
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133634776
DressyPear4 (2023-03-14 17:27:09+00:00): Olá, novas vias devem se conectar com vias já existentes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133634975