piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MFlamm (2024-08-14 09:57:11+00:00): Correctif par rapport à mon commentaire précédent: 
Les choix de catégorisation dans le canton de Vaud sont ici:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland:Vaud/État_des_routes_cantonales
bienvu (2024-08-14 12:43:34+00:00): Bonjour Michael
Merci pour votre commentaire.
Les corrections ont été réalisées.
Meilleures salutations.
Seb
MFlamm (2024-08-14 13:00:47+00:00): Hello Seb,
Merci pour ces corrections.
J'ai encore enlevé quelques tags tracktype... qui ne s'appliquent plus dès lors qu'on enlève highway=track ;-)
nullroute (2024-08-13 20:03:13+00:00): Sorry the changeset comment should have read:

Add a couple buildings.
conradoos (2025-02-03 19:42:48+00:00): Cześć, nie usuwaj placówek edukacyjnych i nie łącz ich w jeden zespół. To nie była dobra zmiana (przy okazji bardzo dużo informacji usunąłeś). Przywróciłem z powrotem przedszkole, szkołę podstawową i liceum Samuel. To są trzy odrębne placówki edukacyjne, a nie jeden zespół szkół.
cuzi (2024-08-14 13:52:29+00:00): Bist du sicher dass basemap.de als Quelle verwendet werden darf? Bei Baden-Württemberg steht dort unter Lizenz, dass eine Namensnennung erfolgen musste
jf_simon (2024-09-10 09:58:22+00:00): Hallo cuzi,

danke für den Hinweis.
Ich habe mich nochmal damit beschäftigt. Du hast recht. Ich darf Basemap nicht angeben. Wurde mir mal anders gesagt. Ich werde es zukünftig unterlassen.

Lieber Gruß Simon
eggie (2024-08-14 05:52:31+00:00): Dag QGerhard. Wanneer je een paaltje niet verbindt met de weg zal het niet werken.
Ik pas wat aan.
De meeste accesstags hoef je niet toe te voegen, alleen de uitzonderingen
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard

MVG
eggie
vojtechzaboril (2024-08-14 10:06:42+00:00): Revertováno https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155231849. Důvody stejné jako dříve, uživatele ani nereaguje.
vojtechzaboril (2024-08-14 10:21:32+00:00): Jinak pokud hlásí navigace sjezd se zpoždění, jedná se o chybu v navigace, ne chybu dat v OSM.
jSeke (2024-08-14 09:19:15+00:00): signage in the Highland Council is bilingual and the council states: "Our commitment is to give equal respect for Gaelic and English on the basis that Gaelic is an essential part of Highland life."

Gaelic is also placed above English on (newer) road signs
Vas111 (2024-08-14 18:22:02+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Scotland
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Scotland#Gaelic_names
I urge you to read these wiki articles. OSM doesn't follow council statements, rather common practice and what's on the ground. In places where language speakers are at least roughly 50/50 (e.g. Na h-Eileanan an Iar, Belgium, Switzerland) we have two or more values in the name tag. The only region where Scots Gaelic is the majority is Na h-Eileanan an Iar, where you can see the name is already in Gaelic. If you want to be able to see the Gaelic name in place of the English name you are welcome to create a renderer that prefers name:gd.
4004 (2024-08-17 23:28:52+00:00): https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1238679660 там при выезде по факту уже 4 полосы же вроде?  https://img.newgrodno.by/wp-content/uploads/1691144591lVya5zxMmLI.jpg
Prusaker (2024-08-18 08:30:43+00:00): https://ibb.co/GkP35s9
На местности три полосы.
4004 (2024-08-18 09:10:41+00:00): До светофора да, я имел в виду после него, но судя по фото и там они так и не нарисовали разметку.
Prusaker (2024-08-18 21:01:09+00:00): https://ibb.co/kSn0dS7
Вид от светофора. Разметки в этом месте вроде и не было.
У меня сложилось впечатление, что от светофора уже само кольцо начинается.
4004 (2024-08-18 21:29:15+00:00): да, ну вот там буквально метр до кольца. раньше в осм просто был отдельный линк на эту поворотную полосу, который я убрал, поэтому сейчас вся надежда на turn:lanes
Prusaker (2024-08-19 05:26:05+00:00): Может всё-таки обратно линк вернуть, как было раньше? Судя по схеме кольца он там логично вписывается. Либо обратно можно вернуть разметку.
Prusaker (2024-08-19 06:31:35+00:00): Вернул 4 полосы как и было до того.
vasony (2024-08-24 07:13:51+00:00): Szia!

Mi szűnt meg, az épülete lebontották?

Tamás
Aandreew (2024-08-24 23:06:58+00:00): Szia!

A tevékenység. Felhagyott a fordítással.

 Aandreew
bkil (2024-08-25 13:43:51+00:00): A következőre kérünk figyelni a jövőben:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Hungary/Fontos_szempontok#Life_cycle_prefix

Visszavontam és átírtam lifecycle prefix használatára: https://osm.org/changeset/155737900#map=19/46.231296/17.614370
vasony (2024-08-25 18:51:51+00:00): Szia!

Itt alapvetően akkor, az volt a gond, hogy a házat és a házszámát törölted nem a tevékenységet. Most akkor a ház vissza lett állítva, a tevékenység nem látszik már, mindenki boldog.

Tamás
GretaMN (2024-08-21 18:04:53+00:00): Liebe:r ole_yx,
auf unbefestigten Wegen, die mit dem normalen Fahrrad nicht nutzbar sind (erkennbar z. B. an smoothness=very_bad) bitte keine Bewertung mit class:bicycle=* vornehmen. Siehe LGMaps-Ausfüllhilfe und Schema unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/LGMaps/class:bicycle. Wenn der Weg für Mountainbiking geeignet ist, kannst du ihn statdessen mit dem class:bicycle:mtb=* Tag bewerten. 
Danke! :)
#lgmaps
AurélienQ (2024-08-20 15:26:43+00:00): Bonjour, la voie est belle et bien supprimée, cf panoramax : https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/#background=streets&focus=pic&map=18.21/47.584597/1.319043&pic=af761ca1-5e3b-4329-a345-224f34dc0cab&speed=250&xyz=0.00/0.00/40
thepoliennist (2024-08-20 16:16:08+00:00): Bonjour, ah oui effectivement. Elle était pratiquable il y a encore quelques jours, ça va vite ^^'

Vous voulez que je modifie ou vous voulez le faire ?
AurélienQ (2024-08-20 19:04:09+00:00): Déjà fait ! ; )
En effet ils sont en plein travaux, mais comme on voit déjà  les tracés j'ai pris les photos.
thepoliennist (2024-08-21 11:15:40+00:00): Ok impec, ça marche
emersonveenstra (2024-08-14 11:42:39+00:00): Hi there,

Thanks for the edits. For the multipolygon, since there already was an existing one (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17929734#map=18/42.95983/-85.79282), you can edit that one directly instead of making a new one
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-07 23:38:16+00:00): is there any reason to not delete https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17933502 and other now gone objects?
Anonymous897234 (2025-07-08 00:45:30+00:00): Well, the city is being physically recreated, starting next week.

To the larger question of why keep it on the map the rest of the year? Few reasons (just my opinion): It's easier than recreating from scratch; folks like to look at it the rest of the year; the land isn't reused for other purposes the rest of the year; precedent of OSM and other maps keep it on the off season.

Year to year, there are a variety of things needing to be deleted/re-positioned/updated, like specific camps, and art work; and updates to the naming of streets, the man pavilion, and temple.
Enovale (2024-08-13 21:27:55+00:00): I also added explicit bicycle access to all roads and sidewalks, sorry for not mentioning
ivanbranco (2024-08-22 11:25:01+00:00): Hi tartiflex,

are there really two different Amazon Lockers with the same ref of is a copy-paste error?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12109192758
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12109192759

thanks and good mapping
Hidoo00 (2024-08-14 07:33:53+00:00): Hi,
I see you have accidentally changed the historic-tag on the foundation. And are all names correct, with some source? I suspect there shouldn't be quotation marks in the Swedish name, for example. 

Best regards with your future edits!
Apache55 (2024-08-14 07:45:14+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for commenting. Here is the source:
https://finspang.se/download/18.43876c7216bc1b5050814f66/1562848025827/Folder%2520om%2520trollk%C3%A4ringeskogen%2520och%2520h%C3%A4xprocesserna.pdf

The original map on page 4.
The Swedish name in the original source has a quotation: 
”Kulknektens” stuggrund”
Hidoo00 (2024-10-31 13:57:25+00:00): Thanks for the great read! This node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12109128256 however still has the nonsensical tag "historic=фунда", which of course should be changed back to "historic=stone". I haven't checked other objects but if you know you've accidentally changed them, please double check!
felipeeugenio (2024-08-14 13:01:22+00:00): Hola.
gracias por sus ediciones. Nos interesa su aporte, pero revisando lo que ha hecho nos resulta dificil entender qué intentó hacer. Los caminos que dibujó ya existen. Tampoco entendemos el mensaje que dejó.
Por favor ingresar al chat de la comunidad en Telegram (app similar a whatsapp) en el link https://t.me/OSMcl.

Allí podremos resolver sus dudas e inquietudes. Además hay maperos de Valdivia que lo pueden ayudar.
bomberos valdivia (2024-08-14 13:17:50+00:00): dejar sin efecto, hace unos meses, el viraje no existía, por lo visto ahora sí. favor dejar nula la modificación.
kapazao (2024-08-14 15:45:34+00:00): Hola, aquí hay varios cambios de clasificación de vías que son incorrectos.
Un enlace de autovía solo puede ser una vía que va exclusivamente de una autovía a otra vía de menor clasificación y viceversa, nunca va a ser una rotonda, puesto que esta se puede usar por completo por otras vías sin necesidad de ir a la autovía.
Por favor revisa la wiki, pregunta a los usuarios que hicieron los cambios y no toques sin conocimiento.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155217158
kapazao (2024-08-14 16:01:16+00:00): Corregido en conjunto de cambios https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155248091
LanxtotVLN (2024-08-13 23:10:07+00:00): atsiprašau dėl itin didelio taškų skaičiaus - didžiąją dalį sudaro tvoros, jų sankirtos
ygcgjp5 (2024-08-14 06:32:00+00:00): nieko blogo taškų kiekyje nėra, tik aš kelčiau klausimą ar kiekvienos tvoros žymėjimas turi kažkokią prasmę.
LanxtotVLN (2024-08-14 14:55:47+00:00): kiti kvartalai, matau, turi tokius sužymėjimus, tad pamaniau vienodai sutvarkyt viską (bent iš pradžių šitoj teritorijoj)
Clthreeoneeight (2024-09-14 18:32:06+00:00): Wouldn't the "junction" at the southern end need to be rebuilt IRL to removed the centre crash barrier every time the Queensferry Crossing closes? The crossover just isn't there until it's rebuilt. I won't revert (because given this site it'll just get re-reverted) but I strongly disagree.
yasslay (2024-09-26 17:55:55+00:00): From my perspective, it doesn't really matter because the crossover has access=no tags like the Dartford Crossing. The moveable barrier should be treated like a gate; it's permissive.
Erick Araujo (2024-12-23 17:24:41+00:00): Oi, cartogravy, tudo bem? Vocês fez alterações importantes relacionadas as permissões de acesso nas ruas da área de apoio do aeroporto, são as ruas de A a P entre as pistas, estarei revertendo essa alteração em função deste erro, peço que atente-se a isso na próxima vez quando for fazer edições do tipo em áreas que talvez não sejam de seu conhecimento... Obrigado.
cartogravy (2024-12-23 23:26:51+00:00): Traducción automática
Olá Erick Araújo,
Obrigado por entrar em contato sobre esta área. Adicionei tags de acesso porque a entrada para esta área parece estar bloqueada no Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&lat=-22.807218551636&lng=-43.254512786865&z=17&pKey=508731113502297). Adiarei seu conhecimento se você acreditar que isso é impreciso.
Atenciosamente,
cartogravy

Hi Erick Araujo,
Thank you for reaching out about this area. I added access tags because the entrance to this area appears to be gated in Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&lat=-22.807218551636&lng=-43.254512786865&z=17&pKey=508731113502297). I will defer to your knowledge if you believe this is inaccurate.
Best regards,
cartogravy
Erick Araujo (2024-12-23 23:38:01+00:00): Sim, é impreciso, visto que existem diversas linhas de transporte público que trafegam pela região, como você pode ver, consultando os elementos/relações das vias em questão.
Erick Araujo (2024-12-23 23:39:35+00:00): Se você quiser reaplicar as outras edições que fez, sinta-se a vontade, só peço que atente-se a questão das permissões das vias. 😊
kitsee (2024-08-14 09:33:21+00:00): Hi there Edit,
I've seen a few of your changeset pass through in the last few days and I would just like to saying that your mapping is very good. I would like to make a couple of recommendations: 

first houses should be tagged with building=house. you can then add extra detail with house=detached/semi-detached/terrace.

I can see you've already added a few address and the tags look good. I would encourage you to add more address since they are possible the single most useful thing that can be added to osm.

Thanks for contribution to OSM and feel free to ask any questions you may have.
Kind regards,
Kits :)
HirschKauz (2024-08-14 10:43:40+00:00): Hi!  
please correct the errors you get before uploading!!
Regards
tastrax (2024-08-16 06:48:46+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
rskedgell (2024-08-14 10:55:51+00:00): Please stop mistagging short-term temporary closures like this. A temporary restriction can be implemented using a conditional restriction.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions

You have been asked not to do this on multiple occasions in the past, yet have chosen to damage the OpenStreetMap database for your own convenience and cannot pretend ignorance.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/18/section/3
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-08-14 12:03:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 155236867 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a temporary road closure.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16581
felipeeugenio (2024-08-14 13:13:05+00:00): Hola. por favor no alterar clasificaciones de calles sin consultar a la comunidad. Esto es un asunto complejo y no tiene relación con lo que nosotros queramos ver de un ruteador.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155217978
felipeeugenio (2024-08-14 13:17:35+00:00): Por favor ingresar al chat de la comunidad en Telegram, para asi poder entender lo que está intentando hacer, que creemos se debe a la circunvalación nueva en Valdivia y los cambios que puede haber en las preferencias de quienes circulan por ahí.
Como lo hizo usted no es la manera, pero entendemos la inquietud y nos interesa escucharlo para ver si amerita hacer cambios.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155217978
bomberos valdivia (2024-08-14 13:20:03+00:00): recibido, respecto a calle (pasaje), en via de ripio, noes calle de cemento o asfaltada, para informar.

lo de Av. valmaceda recibido
InsertUser (2024-08-14 22:20:43+00:00): It's been a while since anyone added from the list of lights. Are you doing a big update or just a few here and there?
neuhausr (2024-08-16 19:02:21+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! The tags you've used on this railway make it appear as if it currently exists. You should tag it as proposed (ie railway=proposed) to be more accurate, otherwise it is likely to be deleted. Even with that tag, given it is a very long range proposal, you may want to check with others about the best ways to handle this, for example on the OSM US Slack. More info specific to railway tagging is on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railways  Happy mapping!
greyim (2025-04-21 20:33:43+00:00): good job
surveyor54 (2025-02-17 12:23:55+00:00): Hallo vichada,
Frage, du bist ja auch schon lange dabei, warum veränderst du die genauen Gebäudeumringe die anhand ALKIS
eingepflegt wurden.

Gruß surveyor54
vichada (2025-02-22 16:43:12+00:00): Sorry, not intentional. Probably didn't even notice the previous used sources .. ? 
Always try to use the most up-to-date (by timestamp)  sources (of course also considering "resolution", "accuracy" ...)
surveyor54 (2025-02-22 21:44:20+00:00): 👍
surveyor54 (2025-02-22 21:56:53+00:00): Please take a look at this example:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162764107#map=11/50.3669/9.2567
skfd (2024-08-14 14:51:32+00:00): You should try Every Door app, much better for editing Points Of Interest!

Also check out Street Complete if you are an android user!
kitsee (2024-08-14 08:51:56+00:00): Hi there, 
correct me if I'm wrong but as far as i can tell all these structures and roads are still standing, just unoccupied at present. I dont believe they should be removed unless they have been destroyed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155218638
gomedia91 (2024-08-14 14:51:51+00:00): No it's been almost entirely levelled. A chunk of the larger tower remains, but it's being demolished at this very moment. Rather than mapping it as currently under demolition, I just removed it since it too will be gone in a matter of days/weeks. Formal roads/car parks in the site aren't being followed or maintained anymore so I removed those as well and has essentially become brownfield/gravel/dirt.

Recent photos from a week or so ago

https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/7848032

https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/7848036

https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/7848040

https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/7848043
kitsee (2024-08-15 13:53:36+00:00): ok thanks for clear this up. you might want to use landuse=brownfield now for this rather than construction but they may be just splitting hairs
kitsee (2024-08-15 13:54:19+00:00): also sorry for my grammar in the last comment XD
gomedia91 (2024-08-15 18:08:29+00:00): no worries I've switched it to brownfield.
Khidistavi (2024-08-14 20:21:30+00:00): Reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155258480
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-26 18:57:33+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12109421464/history has shop = home_goods that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=home_goods ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=houseware ? If yes, what is the difference? Should we document this shop value as distinct, valid and useful?
TrickyFoxy (2024-08-17 08:42:22+00:00): 👋
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/750050351

3=2

What did you mean by that?
diamondarmorsteve (2024-08-18 14:25:30+00:00): Just fixed it, I meant lanes:backward=3. I must've typed the number 3 into the wrong box
yurinchi (2024-08-14 02:46:41+00:00): 建物の追加は行なっていない。
NeisBot (2024-08-14 06:23:46+00:00): Ooops, it seems that some of your names are a bit unusual ...

Amount=1
#NeisLab #Minutely #Naming
svne (2024-08-19 06:11:40+00:00): As a note for next time, please be sure to connect your path to the road instead of the address interpolation line so that it will route properly. Also be wary of crossing building lines. The iD editor provides warning when you do before you publish. That said, thanks for adding the footpath, these are invaluable!
vojtechzaboril (2024-08-14 10:10:39+00:00): Opět přidáváte changeset bez komentáře. Takto OSM opravdu nefunguje.
Udarian (2024-08-14 05:26:47+00:00): Honestly it would be better to keep both in this situation, the tagging on the road and the area representing the area the street side parking actually takes up.
sw_uwu (2024-08-14 15:16:16+00:00): Hi, habe ich etwas falsch editiert?
WoSoe (2024-08-15 03:51:16+00:00): OSM Inspector hat Multipolygone-Fehler (Duplicate_segment) gemeldet.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Inspector/Views/Areas#Duplicate_segments

Betroffene, von dir erstellte, Relation:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17932605

Ich hab die beiden outer vereinigt, siehe Historie zur Relation/Ways.
sw_uwu (2024-08-15 14:46:35+00:00): Mir wird dazu in iD / RapiD keine Meldung angezeigt. Mir ist nicht wirklich bewusst, wie ich das in der Zukunft verhindern könnte
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-14 06:21:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Głowackiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12109632520

"Bandurskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12109632525

"Osiedle Niwa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12109632595

"Osiedle Korcza":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12109665239

"Osiedle Polana Szaflarska":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12109665330
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12109665331
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12109665338

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kitsee (2024-08-14 08:50:08+00:00): Hi there,
why did you remove all the block level residential areas and replace them with a wide area one.  the normal target is to eventually replace all wide area residential areas with block ones.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155221969
gomedia91 (2024-08-14 14:42:03+00:00): I was just following what has generally been done elsewhere in Cardiff. Using large residential areas seems to be the standard. Not seen much block level residential area mapping. Can do that going forward if that's preferred.
Lumikeiju (2024-08-14 17:17:22+00:00): I also prefer block-separated residential landuse vs larger areas covering streets.
gomedia91 (2024-08-14 17:38:01+00:00): no problem. I've switched to doing block separated landuse. thanks for letting me know.
kitsee (2024-08-15 13:51:23+00:00): its one of these controversial things that the community hasn't really decided on. personally. i think limiting residential areas to blocks gives extra information that makes the map easer to read
APneunzehn74 (2024-08-15 10:00:19+00:00): Können hier keine Schuhe mehr abgeben werden?
APneunzehn74 (2024-08-15 10:37:50+00:00): Es können Bekleidung und Schuhe dort eingeworfen werden.
DerOta (2024-08-15 16:56:19+00:00): Hatte ich übersehen, dass das separat ist - Danke!
APneunzehn74 (2024-08-15 17:26:17+00:00): Kein Problem und danke für deine Mithilfe bei OSM.
tastrax (2024-08-16 06:48:29+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
MichS (2024-08-14 13:14:51+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen bei OSM.

Warum wurde access=no eingetragen bitte?

Woher kommt der Name? Gibt es ein Straßenschild?

MFG
fluxxkom (2024-08-14 14:06:32+00:00): hatte access so verstanden, dass man es auf "yes" setzen soll, wenn es eine Art Einfahrteschränkung gibt.
Dies ist dort nicht der Fall.

VG
fluxxkom (2024-08-14 14:08:01+00:00): Der Name kommt aus dort in Kürze eröffnetem Yogapfad, dort werden Schilder für alle 3 Krieger der Yoga-Asanas stehen :)
MichS (2024-08-15 04:29:04+00:00): Nun, bei OSM werden bei Wegen ganz überwiegend bestimmte implizierte Standardwerte angenommen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany

Durch access=no wird der path in einer andern Farbe gezeichnet, was beim bloßen Betrachten der Standarkkarte zur Annahme führt, dass der Weg nicht allgemein zugänglich ist.

Nach Luftbild fahren auf dem Weg wohl zweispurige landwirtschaftliche Fahrzeuge, somit ist ein ein track und kein path.

Gibt es vor Ort Schilder, ganz gleich welcher Art?

Handelt es sich um Wanderwege oder Wegen mit Themen werden Relationen angelegt und nicht der name-tag verwendet.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#Namen_sind_keine_Beschreibungen

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

MFG