piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
yzuio (2026-07-26 05:06:19+00:00): Please note that OpenStreetMap strictly follows the "On-the-ground" rule and maintains a Neutral Point of View (NPOV). For disputed border regions, boundaries must reflect the de facto actual administrative control (Line of Actual Control), rather than de jure political claims or non-recognition by any specific country.

In OSM, it is standard practice to map overlapping claims concurrently using specific tags such as boundary=disputed, claimed_by=*, and disputed_by=*. Removing geographically accurate claim lines, deleting actual control lines, or unilaterally altering boundaries to fit a single nation's political narrative is a direct violation of OSM guidelines.
limes11 (2026-07-04 10:06:22+00:00): Hallo

das war über die beiden Straßen erfasst, siehe die tags an

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46937346

Ehrlich gesagt weiß ich nicht, ob man es separat und an der Straßen erfassen sollte. Aber mich stört es nicht.

Grüße
Dimitar155 (2026-07-15 16:23:18+00:00): Здравей Боби,

Някъде около това ДЗИ (в същия блок или долепения до него) да си видял районен съд? Уж бил в една от двете сгради, но единственото голямо помещение (35064.501.903.3.28 в кадастъра) го дават че е частна собственост.

Поздрави,
Митко
bobbyfuego (2026-07-17 06:23:22+00:00): Здрасти Митко,

Да, правилно си видял. Точно там е в това голямото помещение, в съседната сграда на тази, в която е ДЗИ. Входът на Районния съд е по средата на сградата между двата жилищни входа. Работното време написано на вратата е от 8:30 до 17:00. Не мога да прикачвам снимки тук се оказа.

Поздави,
Боби
Dimitar155 (2026-07-18 07:48:17+00:00): Мерси за информацията. Добавих съда, както и входовете на блока.
eggie (2026-07-03 19:15:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM

The school is already on the map.
I will delete your contribution.
eggie
NieWnen (2026-07-03 15:46:23+00:00): Please do not add access=yes for highways – it allows transport in every possible way (hgvs, horses, bicycles, motor vehicles, etc.)
if it's not private just remove access=private

Adding *=unknown or motor_vehicle tags for footway is not needed.
woodpeck (2026-07-07 11:41:01+00:00): Dear Yog Sot, when adding forest compartments, please specify the data source. Also, "133-letni Grąd w środku Puszczy" is certainly not a NAME - you can add that into the "description" field if you want but please provide suitable sourcing for that information if you do so. Best regards, Frederik Ramm - DWG Ticket #2026070710000391
Yog Sot (2026-07-07 20:47:01+00:00): hey there, i have given the source, it is in the 'imagery_used` 
you can confirm it no prob by asking for the data here: https://www4.bdl.lasy.gov.pl/portal/wniosek 
or check on their interctive maps. 

Names that you're asking for are in official report `Raport | MONITORING PROCESÓW OCHRONY LASÓW W POLSCE | Październik- Listopad 2025 r. Projekt wspierany przez Inicjatywę *1) European Space Agency Network of Resources`
It is presenting a selected parts of bigger forests that are unique and known not only to locals, but also in nation wide forestry talks. Report was prepared in assotiation with *1) ESA, that has given sponshorship for material in this report - including forest names. So parts of the forest are described by their names in this report. Names do contain numbers and might look like a phrase  or some say a description, but those are actual names. Description is much longer. 
I have already presented those arguments earlier.
woodpeck (2026-07-07 21:06:32+00:00): It is not uncommon for a report to identify areas by some sort of name made up for the purpose of that report, but I have a very hard time to believe that if I asked someone where they were today they will reply with "oh, I first thought I might go to 134-letnia Reliktowa Puszcza Borecka but then I changed my mind and took a walk in 120-letnia Ostoja ginących reliktów".

This is a farce. Don't add these names to OSM unless there is a community consensus that adding them in the "name" tag is actually desired in Poland. ("Community consensus" doesn't mean everyone has to say yes, but many more people have to say yes than say no.) It is not enough for you to "present the argument", you need to convince people.
Yog Sot (2026-07-07 21:23:41+00:00): I have actually talked on a meeting today with a person representing local community of "Wojnówko" and he has confirmed that they are actually identifying points of interest in their forest by exactly such names. 
I will send you their statement later on. For now i'm sending you in a private a message from a representative that took part in creation of this report that describe those places.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-08 07:17:05+00:00): "they are actually identifying points of interest in their forest" it is entirely possible

this does not necessarily makes them names

"las pomiędzy drogami 664 i 16, na wschód od linii kolejowej" also may be used as identifier but is extremely unlikely to be name

ones with weirdly specific ages that would change every year are even more dubious
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-08 07:18:42+00:00): Ogólnie akcji nie jestem przeciw, ale jak chcą nazwy wymyślać to takie bardziej stabilne by się przydały...
szydzio (2026-07-08 07:37:05+00:00): @woodpeck:"Don't add these names to OSM unless there is a community consensus that adding them in the "name" tag is actually desired in Poland.". There has been already a discussion on the polish forum, where several users have clearly pointed out, that these are NOT names, see e.g. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/prosby-o-zmapowanie-poprawe/64939/3129 or https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/prosby-o-zmapowanie-poprawe/64939/3135 . There was also a problem of generating fake place=locality, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13339595036/history/5 in order to force rendering on the main layer. In the meantime there are already attempts to restore those “names” from other accounts, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185317512
woodpeck (2026-07-08 07:43:43+00:00): Anyone who insists on adding these names after being told that they shouldn't, will receive an account block (short term at first, longer for repeat offenders). Sock puppet accounts created for the sole purpose of adding these names will be banned outright. If anyone wants to make a map that labels these areas, point them to the umap service where they can do this without impacting the OSM database.
Yog Sot (2026-07-08 11:27:27+00:00): @woodpeck I understand there is a group of people who made complaints to you, but there is another group that do navigate with OSM and they do name those places like this. 
I understand that the first group is trying to discredit overyone else that disagree and they're going to claim everyone else are fake accounts just to win the claim. The community of people that use OSM is far greater than those few people tbh. 
Hence all that I did provide all sources and reasoning. 
There is a claim that a name starting with a number make it invalid as it should change as years goes by, but it does not. Age goes by, but the name is recognized as it is. Age of trees themselves is always a vague matter. `short_name` might be valid for shortened names like `Majestatyczne Dęby`
People are not interested in creating their own maps like uMap but rather using OSM in tourism. Of course if they're not allowed they wont, but i can't say for other people. I have tried my best to describe the situation, but it appears that the person who made a complaint to you made up your mind right away despite all this. 

@szydzio made a claim abaout 'fake' places, but he never actually visited the places, removed em without checking the sources and now is suprised that someone else disagree with him, but he call that person "accounts" with complete disregard that there are actually other actually real people that do know the places. 

@Mateusz  ja nie wiem kto tu dokładnie co wymyślał, tylko zajmowałem się mapowaniem rzeczywistości i właśnie nie chciałem zgadywać czy stosować jakiejś logiki zmiany tych nazw za każdym razem jak wchodzi update wieku. Inna sprawa, że akurat wiek ściętych drzew akurat już się z czasem nie zmienia
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-08 13:24:31+00:00): places are rea, descriptions are used, maybe these descriptions are accurate or not

whether these are names is entirely different thing

> The community of people that use OSM is far greater

yes, and? this is entirely irrelevant in discussion whether these descriptive labels are names or not
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-08 13:25:48+00:00): > People are not interested in creating their own maps like uMap

this does not change anything in what kind of mapping is valid

> Age of trees themselves is always a vague matter. 

what makes labels selected by this organization quite lets say interesting
woodpeck (2026-07-08 13:57:07+00:00): It is impossible to hold a survey of all people that might perhaps use OSM, and even if it was, it is the makers of OSM that get to decide and not the users. I will not be drawn into discussions - we're not having these styles of names on forest compartments unless the Polish OSM community agrees otherwise. Anyone who has added names like this is requested to remove them again, and anyone who adds these names while being aware that they shouldn't will have their account blocked.
szydzio (2026-07-08 16:59:28+00:00): name tags moved to description tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185354605
NieWnen (2026-07-03 21:42:09+00:00): Please try to avoid creating multipolygons for simple landuse shapes.
limes11 (2026-07-04 10:02:50+00:00): Hallo, 

das stimmt so nicht. Du hast beide Tunnelröhren mit access=no bedacht, es bleibt allerdings immer eine Tunnelröhre für den beidseitigen Verkehr befahrbar. 

Das ganze übrigens nach aktuellem Stand ab dem 10. Juli, nicht dem 1.Juli

Grüße
silly_goose (2026-07-04 12:38:01+00:00): Zwei Fehler zum Preis von einem!

Ich kann das erst heute Abend ändern, wird dann aber direkt gemacht!
Danke für den Hinweis :)
silly_goose (2026-07-04 12:41:32+00:00): Ist nun erstmal rückgängig gemacht, ich schau dann heute Abend nochmal rein, wie ich das dann mappen soll

Merci nochmals :)
limes11 (2026-07-04 17:08:56+00:00): Generell ist die Frage, ob man hier überhaupt access restrictions erfasst. Die Sperrungen werden jeweils nur einige Monate lang andauern und eine saubere Erfassung erfordert die Pflege sämtlicher Zuwege, um das Routing zu gewährleisten. Das ist eine Menge Arbeit mit recht wenig Mehrwert.
silly_goose (2026-07-04 20:57:55+00:00): Ich mach diese Sperrungen öfters mal anderswo in NRW rein - Und ja, es ist nicht wenig Arbeit, aber ich muss sagen, dass das für Bonn aktuell die Arbeit wert ist.

Bei euch bröckelt ja irgendwie alles weg und wenn man den paar Leuten, die sich mit OSM navigieren lassen so helfen kann, warum nicht.

Aber was mir gerade auffällt:
Ich kann hier gar nicht korrekt mappen.
Die Stadt Bonn hat nämlich scheinbar gar nix dazu veröffentlicht, wie da der Verkehr jetzt genau laufen soll.
Lediglich der GA hat mehrere Artikel zur Sperrung. Hinter einer Paywall.
caprieldeluca (2026-07-04 01:44:59+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa!  
Revisé los últimos cambios, cambié waterway en los tanques de una planta de agua. Por lo demás se ven bien para mí.  
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto
fndoder (2026-07-04 03:42:19+00:00): Прошу не создавать дубли уже существующих улиц/дорог (в том числе не обводить их дублирующими дорогами "пожирнее" - если нужно, можно скорректировать уровень существующей дороги).

Кроме того, тег name должен заполняться согласно правилам, см. документацию https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог

Я поправил.
Bienson (2026-07-04 00:51:24+00:00): Wenn die Umrisse beim NRW Liegenschaftskataster vorhanden sind, bitte diese verwenden.
Bienson (2026-07-04 00:53:27+00:00): Laut ALKIS Hausnummer 7
stirps (2026-07-03 12:47:56+00:00): Hi,
schau dir mal https://facilmap.org/#19/51.91086/8.38991/Mpnk/%22changeset%20185037275%22 und den südlichen in grün dargestellten Teil an. Dort scheinen dir Gleise und das Signal verrutscht zu sein, die Verbindung ist falsch. Es wäre gut wenn du das rückgängig machen könntest.

Und aus Interesse: Stammen die Gleisnummern für die TWE aus offiziellen Quellen oder sind die nur von dir durchnummeriert worden?

VG stirps
ModernesUniversellesNouvelles (2026-07-03 14:04:19+00:00): Hallo, müsste nun wieder stimmen. Schau gerne nochmal drüber oder verbessere es, wenn du magst.

Die Gleisnummern stammen aus offizieller Quelle, die allerdings leider nicht öffentlich sind.

Liebe Grüße
stirps (2026-07-03 14:30:00+00:00): Es gab noch einen kleinen Fehler (du hattest Signal und Weiche verklebt), das habe ich mal in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185043438 gefixt.
Mehr hatte ich jetzt nicht gefunden.
stirps (2026-07-03 14:33:18+00:00): Achso, noch bzgl. der Quelle: Du musst da ggf. lizenztechnisch aufpassen, das weißt du?
ModernesUniversellesNouvelles (2026-07-03 14:38:15+00:00): Das weiß ich :) Ich arbeite für den Infrastrukturbetreiber und wir nutzen OSM für interne Zwecke, deshalb liegt uns auch etwas daran, dass die Daten hier ordentlich sind - schadet ja auch nicht.
stirps (2026-07-03 14:44:48+00:00): Ah, super! Finde ich auf jeden Fall cool dass ihr auch Sachen einpflegt.
stirps (2026-07-03 15:50:21+00:00): Es ist ein long shot aber ich versuche es mal trotzdem: Die Signale an der TWE sind nur bis Harsewinkel und Sürenheide gemapped. Du hast nicht zufälligerweise Zugriff auf eine Karte oder Liste mit Signalen, die ihr veröffentlichen oder von der ihr selbst die Signale einzeichnen könntet?
Besonders mit der Reaktivierung in den kommenden Jahren könnte das auf jeden Fall interessant sein auch in OSM zu haben.
ModernesUniversellesNouvelles (2026-07-03 16:01:41+00:00): Ich würde mich drum kümmern, habe aber leider weder die nötigen Kontakte zu der Unternehmenssparte (ich bin in der IT tätig und habe hier nur ein Projekt umgesetzt), noch die Kapazitäten (und die Begründung) dafür.. wenn ich sie mal in die Hände bekomme, denke ich an dich und komme nochmal darauf zurück.
無限の刃 (2026-07-11 05:52:55+00:00): Hello.

>Remember that things may have changed since the photographs were taken; we are trying to map what is there now and not when the photographs were taken.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.1.2

>Things change. Imagery gets old. Road layouts change. Buildings get knocked down and rebuilt in different places. Imagery can be many years old. Armchair mapping involves blindly copying this information but in an area where locals have contributed, you should be very careful about this. Look out for tell-tale signs. If the whole area has building outlines drawn in, and you see just one missing, or one drawn in completely the wrong shape, don't just "fix" it. Alarm bells should be ringing.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Armchair_mapping

Do not edit random place by aerial imageries.

You can check Esri aerial imagery to check construction.
Dimitar155 (2026-07-03 20:02:33+00:00): Всичко изглежда наред. Само магазин Магнит (node/3473470546) вероятно не е част от верига магазини, работещи в Русия.
eggie (2026-07-03 19:54:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Gebruik de aanwezige adresnode om op bij te taggen. Ik he de info samengevoegd.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Rik Platte (2026-07-04 14:49:52+00:00): Hoi Eggie, veel dank voor het uitgebreide welkom! 
Met vriendelijke groet,
Rik
southglos (2026-07-03 20:08:44+00:00): Is this actually open yet?  Last announcement said 6am Monday 6th July.
swinetown (2026-07-06 14:06:37+00:00): I think this edit was a smidge premature but it's open now.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c79yy70pzepo
evgenykatyshev (2026-07-03 13:17:13+00:00): Sorry, edited the wrong node by mistake. I'll revert it
eggie (2026-07-03 19:59:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-03 20:00:28+00:00): Vreemd dat het pand twee verschillende adressen heeft.

MVG
eggie
Kees 59 (2026-07-04 09:43:58+00:00): < twee verschillende adressen

Niet volgens de BAG, " 	Weg achter het Bos 1" bestaat niet in de BAG.

P.S. Openingstijden komen niet overeen met de website https://www.bloem-arnhem.nl/contact
eggie (2026-07-04 09:51:07+00:00): PB met feedback gestuurd naar Marijn.
Marijn-Bloem (2026-07-07 10:10:16+00:00): Klopt dat dat het adres officieel niet bestaat. Maar gasten/leveranciers kunnen het wel door dit adres beter vinden. Wordt al jaren zo gebruikt. de Weg naar de Stenen Tafel is niet toegankelijk voor auto's en zodoende kunnen sommige autonavigaties niet naar de locatie navigeren en een heel stuk moeten lopen.
eggie (2026-07-07 10:21:38+00:00): Dan heet het pragmatisch taggen 😀
Kees 59 (2026-07-07 10:41:22+00:00): Zeker pragmatisch.
Misschien een note toevoegen met deze informatie (voor de zekerheid: ik bedoel het note veld en niet een losse note).

En al brainstormend misschien ook not:source:BAG=yes o.i.d.?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-03 15:32:58+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with promotional description=* and other malformed/nonsense tags

https://osm.org/changeset/185046858
eggie (2026-07-03 20:00:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2026-07-05 22:37:14+00:00): lijn 21 heeft geen stop_positions en geen platforms meer.
Was dat ook de bedoeling ?
A67-A67 (2026-07-06 18:49:12+00:00): Lijnen 303, 352 en 21 zijn samengevoegd tot lijn 303. Dus technisch gezien heeft lijn 21 inderdaad geen haltes meer. Ik was vergeten de relatie te verwijderen en dat heb ik nu wel gedaan.

Bedankt voor het opmerken.
trigpoint (2026-07-30 11:17:34+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/186636267
WupperWolf (2026-07-03 13:57:36+00:00): – Adressen ergänzt
– Trend Döner: Öffnungszeiten und Sitzmöglichkeiten aktualisiert, Telefonnummer ergänzt 
– A-Chén: Neu hinzugefügt 
– Bergisch Burger: Öffnungszeiten und Sitzmöglichkeiten aktualisiert, E-Mail ergänzt 
– Ibili: Öffnungszeiten und Telefonnummer ergänzt 
– Mode für Männer: Telefonnummer ergänzt 
– Ursels Stoffstube: Zahlungsmittel ergänzt 
– Tedi: Öffnungszeiten und Zahlungsmittel ergänzt  
– Dolomiti: Öffnungszeiten und Sitzmöglichkeiten aktualisiert 
– Mediterran: Öffnungszeiten und Zahlungsmittel ergänzt
DP24PH (2026-07-03 14:06:48+00:00): ERRATUM: DP24 #DPresearch #Mapping101 #MegaManila ALERT: [ #Taguig ] #FEASTTaguig missing POI fixes
9142322 (2026-07-04 06:01:44+00:00): Hello Bob, thank you for tagging the new East County Library. I noticed a couple of tags that I've adjusted:

description=New library yay! and loc_name=New Library are more of a personal note, so I've removed them. description=* should be used for factual descriptions which can't be represented with standard OSM tags, and loc_name=* should be for a name that locals actually use, not a reaction to the new construction.

floors=3 and layers=3 are duplicate information and are not widely used by OSM mappers. I removed them for your pre-existing tags you've already added, which are roof:levels=*, building:levels=*, and building:levels:underground=* 

Everything else you've added looks good; thanks for the contribution.
bobthebuilder423468 (2026-07-06 01:16:24+00:00): YW. thanks for helping!
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-03 15:08:42+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contribution! I noticed that the name=* tag appears to contain an address. In OSM, name=* should normally contain the real-world name of the feature, as shown on-site or commonly used locally. Could you please adjust or remove name=* ?
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-03 14:56:11+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 177069482, 177146365, 177192785, 177192788, 177297939, 177297945, 177297949, 177297954, 177452788, 177452791, 177452792, 177452795, 177452798, 177452800, 177452810, 177527992, 177527995, 177527998, 177528001, 177570394, 177570400, 177642961, 177642964, 177780672, 177780678, 177780684, 177780688, 177780692, 177780694, 177780700, 178011855, 178011867, 178011873, 178011881, 178283147, 178283151, 178283157, 178283164, 178283174, 178283182, 178505616, 178505629, 178505639, 178505652, 178505661, 178505677, 178509782, 178511554, 178785497, 178785505, 178785517, 178785521, 178785527, 178785535, 178785555, 178785560, 178785566, 179220508, 179220516, 179220523, 179220526, 179220533, 179220543, 179220550, 179220556, 179220564, 179220583, 179279603, 179279604, 179279606, 179279608, 179279610, 180001463, 180001477, 180001490, 180001506, 180001520, 180001533, 180001547, 180001561, 180001581, 180001705, 180345867, 180345875, 180345878, 180345883, 180345893, 180346092, 180647427, 180647438, 180647447, 180647454, 180647460, 180647468, 180992000, 180992009, 180992017, 180992030, 180992037, 180992048, 180992480, 181477593, 181477599, 181477601, 181477619, 181477622, 181477629, 181477635, 181477681, 181478329, 181820371, 181820381, 181820392, 181820401, 181820414, 181820422, 181820695, 182050056, 182050065, 182050071, 182050083, 182335631, 182335635, 182335643, 182599210, 182599221, 182599233, 182599238, 182599248, 182803177, 182803181, 182803187, 182803194, 182803205, 182943162, 182943170, 182943179, 182943218, 183372937, 183372945, 183372950, 183372958, 183372971, 183372978, 183372990, 183373000, 183373211, 184170104, 184170115, 184170128, 184170139, 184170149, 184170163, 184170177, 184170190, 184170213, 184170229, 184190231, 184190424, 184191543, 184306848, 184306863, 184306873, 184306881, 184306889, 184306900, 184306905, 184306912, 184306916, 184306923, 184344169, 184344176, 184638111, 184638132, 184638141, 184638153, 184640089, 184660965, 184664784, 184668430, 184690022, 184715847, 184808132, 184835720, 184848267, 184899468, 184903702, 184907372, 184921339, 184929934, 184968175, 184972609.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-03 14:56:07+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 177069482, 177146365, 177192785, 177192788, 177297939, 177297945, 177297949, 177297954, 177452788, 177452791, 177452792, 177452795, 177452798, 177452800, 177452810, 177527992, 177527995, 177527998, 177528001, 177570394, 177570400, 177642961, 177642964, 177780672, 177780678, 177780684, 177780688, 177780692, 177780694, 177780700, 178011855, 178011867, 178011873, 178011881, 178283147, 178283151, 178283157, 178283164, 178283174, 178283182, 178505616, 178505629, 178505639, 178505652, 178505661, 178505677, 178509782, 178511554, 178785497, 178785505, 178785517, 178785521, 178785527, 178785535, 178785555, 178785560, 178785566, 179220508, 179220516, 179220523, 179220526, 179220533, 179220543, 179220550, 179220556, 179220564, 179220583, 179279603, 179279604, 179279606, 179279608, 179279610, 180001463, 180001477, 180001490, 180001506, 180001520, 180001533, 180001547, 180001561, 180001581, 180001705, 180345867, 180345875, 180345878, 180345883, 180345893, 180346092, 180647427, 180647438, 180647447, 180647454, 180647460, 180647468, 180992000, 180992009, 180992017, 180992030, 180992037, 180992048, 180992480, 181477593, 181477599, 181477601, 181477619, 181477622, 181477629, 181477635, 181477681, 181478329, 181820371, 181820381, 181820392, 181820401, 181820414, 181820422, 181820695, 182050056, 182050065, 182050071, 182050083, 182335631, 182335635, 182335643, 182599210, 182599221, 182599233, 182599238, 182599248, 182803177, 182803181, 182803187, 182803194, 182803205, 182943162, 182943170, 182943179, 182943218, 183372937, 183372945, 183372950, 183372958, 183372971, 183372978, 183372990, 183373000, 183373211, 184170104, 184170115, 184170128, 184170139, 184170149, 184170163, 184170177, 184170190, 184170213, 184170229, 184190231, 184190424, 184191543, 184306848, 184306863, 184306873, 184306881, 184306889, 184306900, 184306905, 184306912, 184306916, 184306923, 184344169, 184344176, 184638111, 184638132, 184638141, 184638153, 184640089, 184660965, 184664784, 184668430, 184690022, 184715847, 184808132, 184835720, 184848267, 184899468, 184903702, 184907372, 184921339, 184929934, 184968175, 184972609.