piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Piz Pachific (2026-04-15 21:25:07+00:00): Vergleiche auch die Verbreitung:
https://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/addr%3Afull/&***/addr%3Ahousenumber/&***/addr%3Astreet/&***/addr%3Apostcode/&***/addr%3Acity/
Piz Pachific (2026-04-15 21:27:02+00:00): Bzw:
https://taginfo.osm.ch/keys/addr:housenumber
https://taginfo.osm.ch/keys/addr:full
TheGinger68 (2026-06-11 13:43:02+00:00): Why is this road changed to Proposed? It is under construction and work is actively being done to it.
Joseph R P (2026-06-11 18:32:28+00:00): Copernicus imagery from around the time of this changeset (April 10, 2026) showed no under-construction road segments, at most a clearcut through the woods for the future roadway. The most recent imagery with any sense of clarity that I can access is from May 30, and only a clearcut is still visible, though it is possible road construction has started since then, if that is the reason for this change.
TheGinger68 (2026-06-11 18:39:25+00:00): There is a news item that suggests construction has began: https://wvpublic.org/story/government/timber-cleared-construction-to-begin-on-king-coal-highway/
Joseph R P (2026-06-11 18:54:10+00:00): I don't believe construction has officially started yet. The article only confirms that the woods have been cleared in the right-of-way and that construction was expected to start in August 2025. It appears that something may have stalled the project since there are no more updates like an article confirming that construction has officially begun, nor is there any visible road construction in imagery from as recently as less than two weeks ago.
TheGinger68 (2026-06-11 18:57:59+00:00): I agree. I'll revert my change and change the status back when construction actually starts.
Joseph R P (2026-06-11 19:06:32+00:00): Thank you, I appreciate it!
Kovoschiz (2026-04-16 18:02:26+00:00): But do you have any suggestion to show a `place=` doesn't use `addr:place=` + `addr:housenumber=` ? If someone draws the `building=` inside later, I can't be expected add `nohousenumber=yes` to every one of them.
Hypsometric (2026-04-17 17:34:32+00:00): Thanks for asking. Maybe I'm missing something. Why would a city or town (i.e. place=*) ever have a addr:housenumber=* assigned to it?
Kovoschiz (2026-04-18 09:11:52+00:00): Ok let me rephrase: What should be used to show there's no `addr:housenumber=` inside?
Hypsometric (2026-04-19 19:49:26+00:00): Sorry. I still do not understand what you are asking. All of the features in this changeset were nodes. So they cannot have something else inside them.

Are you trying to denote that all of the buildings in a place=* have nohousenumber=yes? If so, I believe nohousenumber=yes should be added to each building.

However, when I go to Pak Tin Pa Tsuen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3047962925) all of the buildings have addr:housenumbers. Maybe I am still on the wrong line of thinking.
LambdaComplex (2026-05-03 13:52:55+00:00): Que es esto? las lineas ferroviarias de San Salvador ya no estan en uso y estan abandonadas y ya obstruidas por otras cosas
Ltrlg (2026-04-19 06:53:40+00:00): Quelle est la source ?
mw014 (2026-04-20 12:32:00+00:00): C'est une imprécision que j'avais corrigé dans la foulée par "name=Consigne Pickup Espace Anjou Angers", cependant j'ai oublié de préciser que l'information venait de https://localiser.laposte.fr/maine-et-loire/angers
à mettre dans source:name ?
Puisque les autres informations viennent bien de source=https://www.la-galerie.com/espace-anjou/boutiques/
Ltrlg (2026-04-20 16:11:15+00:00): L’étiquette source=* sur les objets est plutôt une pratique obsolète. Ça peut avoir des cas d’utilisations, mais il est plus simple pour tout le monde de mettre les sources dans le changeset. Normalement JOSM t’y incite en colorant le champ en orange tant qu’il est vide.
iandees (2026-04-15 21:32:06+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/906000529 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181388268, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
bxl-forever (2026-04-16 08:33:17+00:00): Hello,

Here is a review of your changeset.

Adding the car wash station as a node is fine, this is what was recommended in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5250078

Most new users make this mistake, so I’ll have to say it again.  When you create a node… please *never* put an address to it.  I show the simple online editor shows text boxes for addresses, but those should not be used in most European countries, when addresses are already mapped.  Duplicate addresses are not wanted.  I’ll clean that.

Also, operator="Châtelain Service Station" does not match any existing business.  I don’t think it is a big issue, but this is usually how the operator tag works: we write the name of an existing company, or we make sure that several points have the same operator tag, so that they can be grouped together.

Thanks.
Charlaiz (2026-04-16 11:33:11+00:00): Great feedback, thanks for it! All well noted
NeisBot (2026-04-15 21:30:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13733462946 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Accounting office"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Biuro rachunkowe"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisBot (2026-04-15 21:33:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13733462946 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Accounting office"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Biuro rachunkowe"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
Wildsharky (2026-04-17 12:05:56+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181440435
felipeeugenio (2026-04-16 13:36:50+00:00): Hola. Trasladó el edificio completo.
Es correcto eso? tiene la misma forma y dimansiones?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181388385
sebaver01 (2026-04-23 01:42:53+00:00): No es un edificio es una carpa
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181388385
Ahmed Wali Deria Guled (2026-04-15 21:45:41+00:00): Hawd Zone located in Gashamo Hawd Somali Ethiopia
SomeoneElse (2026-04-16 13:32:13+00:00): What is the licence associated with http://www.ethionsdi.gov.et/layers/geonode:ethipoian_zone ?
9_tab (2026-04-15 21:53:02+00:00): done with: https://bbl-dres.github.io/property-inventory/osm-height/
TriRIK (2026-04-15 22:01:06+00:00): Consistent with the "old" A1 road Farish - Rosoman and A2 road Rankovce - Kriva Palanka
NeisBot (2026-04-15 22:03:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13730812300 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Medical spa"

#MapWithoutSpam
Іванченко Михайло (2026-04-15 22:49:37+00:00): nn
5m4u9 (2026-04-16 05:20:34+00:00): Hola, en este cambio hiciste que la av. circunvalación oeste (frente a YPFB) sea de 6 carriles, eso está bien? 

viendo la última imagen satelital de 2025 se ven a lo máximo 4 (2 por sentido)....
Omar Tintilay (2026-04-23 15:44:30+00:00): es una calle de 23m de ancho, a 3.6m son 6.4 carriles, pero volvere a ponerle de 4.
5m4u9 (2026-04-24 14:38:51+00:00): Hola, gracias por responder.

Explico un poco, en OSM el número de carriles no son los supuestos u oficiales, sino los efectivos o físicos visibles. En las vías que no son pavimentadas es más difícil saber cuántos carriles hay.

En mi experiencia mapeando en Bolivia, la mayoría de las vías no pavimentadas son 1 o 2 carriles, 2 para vías anchas (no importando el ancho) y 1 para vías en barrios.

Es interesante esto porqué casi siempre son 1 carril por sentido? para mi es por la comodidad del que conduce el auto, casi siempre en una vía no pavimentada tienden al centro o "a la huella previa", casi nadie hará nueva huella (nuevo carril) aún habiendo espacio, yo pienso que no lo hacen porque conlleva arruinar la suspensión del auto.

En las vías como este caso, ocurre casi lo mismo con la diferencia que los camiones son más anchos y hacen huella en uno y medio carril, y a veces los mismos camiones o autos quieren adelantar y crean otro carril.

En Cochabamba, es interesante, muchas de las calles tiene carriles pintados, en estas la gente conserva "su carril", pero en calles de 2 carriles (por el ancho) los autos tienden a ir al centro... no se porqué, será que sus autos tiene la dirección desviada? 🤔

Yo manejo bicicleta en Cochabamba, y en las calles que tienen carriles se ve como muy ordenado la "mayoría" conserva carril, pero en avenidas o calles sin carril... es un desorden o algunos se cargan a la derecha... 

en fin, gracias por corregir y mapear Villazón!
anotherToad (2026-05-01 13:09:07+00:00): Hey CHESE123, the airport is closed and the runways are disused, which is why they aren't supposed to show up. I've went and fixed it.
inserteunnombreaqui (2026-04-15 23:22:13+00:00): woo!
Wildsharky (2026-04-17 12:01:24+00:00):  Reverted in changeset id:181409882
rempshaener (2026-04-16 19:23:27+00:00): Hallo,
ein foot=yes und "Betreten verboten" widerspricht sich.
Viele Grüße
estman (2026-04-16 21:03:53+00:00): Hallo,
danke für den Hinweis. Ich hab gezögert, die ältere Notiz "Betreten verboten" zu löschen, aber si ist wahrscheinlich obsolet. Ich bin gestern dort gewesen und da ist ein "Reiten verboten" Schild (das runde Verkehrschild), aber von "Betreten verboten" habe ich nichts gesehen. Wo dort nicht geritten werden darf, darf man auch nicht radfahren.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2026-04-26 09:54:16+00:00): Hallo,
deine Änderung kann ich noch nicht ganz nachvollziehen.
Einen Teil der Wege hast du auf 
bicycle=no
foot=no
gesetzt, obwohl bereits access=no gesetzt war.
Einen anderen Teil hast du auf
bicycle=no
foot=yes
gesetzt, obwohl laut note ein Schild „Schild: Naturschutzgebiet - Betreten verboten“ gesetzt ist. 
Die Wege liegen im NSG https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/181474205.
Der hier mit foot=yes gesetzte Weg ist nicht befestigt. Damit gilt nach § 3 Abs. 2 Nr. 9 der ordnungsbehördlichen Verordnung über die Festsetzung des Naturschutzgebietes "Himmelgeister Rheinbogen" ein Betretungsverbot.
Das ist am Eingang zum NSG auch jeweils so ausgeschildert.
Bitte mache deine Anpassungen hinsichtlich des foot=yes rückgängig.
Viele Grüße
estman (2026-04-26 10:10:05+00:00): ok
Yunan973 (2026-04-16 12:11:52+00:00): Bonjour,

peux tu éviter de créer des éléments en double ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11561353/history#map=13/45.49520/5.31305

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20454097/history#map=13/45.49520/5.31305

Ta relation 20454097 est à supprimer.

Cordialement
Water-polo (2026-04-16 12:30:25+00:00): Bonjour,
JOSM à crache en pleine exportation des données. Je découvre par ton commentaire qu'un groupe de modification à quand même eu lieu.
Cependant j'ai édité beaucoup plus que ces quelques changements.
Je regarde plus en détail plus tard depuis un ordinateur.
Merci pour ta vigileance 👍
Baloo Uriza (2026-04-16 01:26:59+00:00): I moved that up to the end of the ramp that actually has the freeway junction.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181391133
Shyshka (2026-04-27 17:18:22+00:00): На місці універмагу хіба зараз ведеться будівництво?
Kai Johnson (2026-06-04 13:42:34+00:00): I noticed you deleted all the tags from way/37913359. It's ok to delete most of the tags from the ways that are only used in boundary relations. But please keep the source tag. That's very helpful when we come back in a few years and try to figure out which version of the TIGER data this boundary came from. I see there's a copy of the tag on the relation itself, but keeping the tag on the member way makes it much easier to find boundary data that's out of date.
iandees (2026-04-16 02:05:02+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2045459152 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181392454, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-04-16 02:51:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13733754429 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cerrajería"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Cerrajería"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
Marcos Cerrajeros Alcorcón (2026-04-16 02:58:48+00:00): solucionado
NeisBot (2026-04-16 02:57:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 15 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1499792638 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1499792635 v1 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181392996
Wildsharky (2026-04-17 12:18:25+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181451876
Wildsharky (2026-04-17 12:14:42+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181446666
Wildsharky (2026-04-17 12:16:09+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181449811
ajmat (2026-04-19 05:12:22+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 181522900
Wildsharky (2026-04-17 12:17:36+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181451655
ajmat (2026-04-17 10:54:08+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 181451941
Wildsharky (2026-04-17 12:19:24+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181452691
iandees (2026-04-16 03:32:30+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13422395833 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181393464, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
5m4u9 (2026-04-16 06:02:01+00:00): Hi, the official name of the highway is "Doble Vía Sucre-Yamparaéz"... between ->

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=-19.064473%2C-65.243956%3B-19.18615%2C-65.11483#map=13/-19.13172/-65.17948
KainjiLake (2026-04-17 18:14:02+00:00): Hi 5m4u9, thanks for letting me know! I can changes the name back to its original state. I noticed the diacritics of the previous name are "Doble Vía Sucre-Yamparáez”. Can you confirm which is more accurate and I will restore the name tag? 
Happy mapping!
5m4u9 (2026-04-18 00:35:40+00:00): Hi, sorry, it was “Doble Vía Sucre-Yamparáez,” just as you wrote it (with an accent on the "a").

from here -> https://osm.org/go/NhLWjNsb8--?m= to https://osm.org/go/NhLPHErkA-?m=
KainjiLake (2026-04-20 18:17:49+00:00): Thanks 5m4u9, I’ve updated the name. Have a nice day!
b-jazz (2026-04-18 01:07:10+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181480961
NeisBot (2026-04-16 03:57:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13733834220 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Phone number"

#MapWithoutSpam
Wildsharky (2026-04-21 03:27:38+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181539254
VisibleSouth (2026-04-16 05:38:53+00:00): There's no motorway there, so please don't enter any nonsense.
NeisBot (2026-04-16 05:30:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 25 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1499803373 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1499803555 v1 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1499803371 v1 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181395252
iandees (2026-04-16 14:52:03+00:00): Hi! It looks like the website URL on way/1012279264 may have been copied from Google Maps (it contained Google tracking parameters). Please be careful not to copy information from Google into OpenStreetMap, as Google's data is copyrighted.
Supaplex (2026-04-16 08:23:39+00:00): 請好好寫changeset comment，這裡是新北市淡水區淡海的淡江大橋，寫台北並不精確
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181395827
NeisBot (2026-04-16 06:09:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/117866619 v6

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Hörakustiker"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und faktischere Version deines Textes lauten: "Hörakustiker"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
perenniallylate (2026-04-27 11:09:54+00:00): Hoi Fl3tron, dieses Stück Weg/Strasse ist relativ lang. Heisst es wirklich durchgehend Gerenweg? Ansonsten müsste man es irgendwo zwischendrin aufteilen und eines Sonnengasse und eines Gerenweg benennen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181396519
NeisBot (2026-04-16 06:30:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13733973172 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Office building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisBot (2026-04-16 06:33:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13733962627 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Botanical supplier"

#MapWithoutSpam
Cybermanx (2026-04-16 21:48:27+00:00): Ciao, mi sono permesso di fare revert del tuo changeset perchè ho notato che cancellava tutta la strada, anche se il tuo commento cita esplicitamente che solo la svolta a sinistra è bloccata dal cantiere.
Suppongo che sia stato del tutto involontario, perchè vedo anche che hai fatto l'edit con Vespucci, che io ho sempre trovato non semplice da gestire (questa è una mia opinione obv).
Io non sono passato da quelle parti da un po', però se ricordi con certezza dall'elaborato tram che la svolta a sinistra sarà per sempre vietata, puoi cancellare senza problemi la curva, che ho taggato come construction in modo da confermare il tuo edit.
Buona serata!
tassoman (2026-04-16 23:30:37+00:00): Ciao, grazie per l'intervento, in effetti non avevo intenzione di rimuovere la strada completa! ;_ ; 
Ma soltanto la curva a destra.
Con vespucci, starò più attento a fare modifiche minori. Intanto grazie. Vediamo come procede l'attività.
tassoman (2026-04-16 23:31:46+00:00): Intendo dire la curva a sinistra, arrivando da passarotti
eggie (2026-04-16 07:08:32+00:00): Dag MTijn,
Voor welke periode is dit fietspad afgesloten?
De periode bepaalt of we iets wel of niet afsluiten in OSM.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-16 07:11:18+00:00): 16-03-2026 07:00 t/m 19-06-2026 16:00 

In de regel taggen we wegen in onderhoud met een begin en einddatum.
Dan gaat de weg na einddatum automatisch weer open.

Een voorbeeld..
access:conditional=no @ (2025 Sep 20-2026 Apr 03)
MTijn (2026-04-16 10:17:22+00:00): Het lijkt er niet op dat de huidige weg in deze staat terug keert, het gebied wordt flink onder handen genomen.

https://www.almere.nl/verkeer-en-vervoer/werkzaamheden-almere-poort/tot-half-oktober-werkzaamheden-duindijk-midden
eggie (2026-04-16 10:44:26+00:00): Oke.. up to you!

Mvg,
eggie
JJIglesias (2026-04-16 08:08:18+00:00): Hi. Are you the validator for all these TomTom/Hot building adding projects?
Scalarik (2026-05-23 08:15:23+00:00): Heippa, service=driveway kuuluu kiinteistölle johtaville ajoväylille, ei kaikille mahdollisille pikkuteille kuten olet muokannut Vantaan ajoharjoitteluradalla.
liljaadeliina (2026-05-27 11:37:11+00:00): Hei

Unohdin tuon, kun kartoitin karttaa, kiitos kun muistutit.

Olen tarkempi tulevaisuudessa.