piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Sylabowy Kot (2025-06-05 06:35:46+00:00): Też się wypowiem, bo to ja potem faktycznie otworzyłem Plac na OSM :P Slideq użył iD editora, a jak wiadomo, tam łatwiej o jakieś pomyłki. Zwłaszcza jak jest się początkującym i nie zna JOSMa, przy którym to dopiero maper się rozwija. 

Zostawiłem nazwę Plac Centralny, bo ta jest używana jest też na nowych słupach informacyjnych o historii miejsca, więc nie jest to anonimowy twór, czekający tylko na uchwałę rady miasta. Przykładowo - Plac 5 Rogów - też element marketingowego tzw. Nowego Centrum Warszawy - miał uchwałę na imienniczkę, ale ta została unieważniona, więc jest nazwa, która była przez wszystkie strony promowana. Tu faktycznie mamy do czynienia z nową nazwą, ale z racji na powszechność nawet on-the-ground wypada, by była jednak używana.
YacoobPL (2025-06-05 09:36:59+00:00): Hej, dzięki za komentarz :) jeżeli faktycznie ta nazwa jest używana w fizycznej przestrzeni, to nie widzę przeszkód!
gmar5 (2025-06-05 15:09:46+00:00): Hello. I had reverted your previous changeset, based on my comment here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167137992
Let me know if you think it makes sense. Thanks.
IvaLedinščak (2025-06-17 18:49:43+00:00): Reverted because of unnecessary node #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167752102
Elizen (2025-06-11 09:51:57+00:00): Аналогичная ситуация этому пакету правок: osm.org/changeset/167240130
Глеб (2025-06-11 10:09:39+00:00): Вернул
Fizzie-DWG (2025-07-03 05:05:36+00:00): DWG revert - inexplicable mapping & unknown sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168425292
Elizen (2025-06-11 09:43:27+00:00): Аналогичная ситуация этому пакету правок: osm.org/changeset/167240130
Глеб (2025-06-11 10:07:12+00:00): Вернул
ivanbranco (2025-06-04 22:24:05+00:00): Ciao Marco, 

questa modifica ha generato almeno 33 warning, forse dovevano farti capire che qualcosa non era andato correttamente. Ripristino la situazione precedente.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-07-03 05:09:01+00:00): DWG revert - inexplicable mapping & unknown sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168425457
Senihtu (2025-07-02 16:04:15+00:00): Hi!
Wenn das eine Einbahnstraße wird - was macht denn dann die Buslinie 78? Nimmt die einen anderen Weg?
weiter frohes mappen!
Elizen (2025-06-11 09:53:23+00:00): Аналогичная ситуация этому пакету правок: osm.org/changeset/167240130
Глеб (2025-06-11 10:10:14+00:00): Вернул
NorthCrab_upload (2025-06-04 21:23:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Świętego Józefa - Robotnika":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887553908
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887553909
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887553910
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887553911
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887553912
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887553913

"Osiedle Środki":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887553914
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887553915

"Osiedle Nad Potokiem":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887553916

"Cichorzyn":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887554078

"Na Dolinę":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887554079

"Deptak Dra Franciszka Gumowskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887554214

"Franciszka Koterby-kuriera AK":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887554215
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887554216
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887554217
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887554218
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887554219
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887554220

"Karola Wojtyły - Papieża":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887554228
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887554229
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887554230

"Osiedle Ziemianki":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887554379
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887554380
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887554381
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887554382
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887554383
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887554384
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521356442

"Osiedle Kotelnica":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887554398

"Osiedle Polanka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887554425

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2025-06-05 09:55:08+00:00): Poprawione.
dieterdreist (2025-09-25 08:05:32+00:00): Hi, I wanted to tell you that you have deleted the address information here: node 2577207168. I guess it was not intentional?
Cheers 
Martin
dieterdreist (2025-09-25 08:09:49+00:00): also sidewalks must not be connected to buildings and walls unless they do in reality, they should run between roads and buildings in the typical situation, and when there is no sidewalk it must not be drawn
dieterdreist (2025-09-26 09:34:22+00:00): Another thing I noticed you broke in this changeset: you created way 1392216201 and disconnected way 35032926 from the road network (I just fixed it). Please be careful, because "pedestrian" highways allow for vehicles, while footways do not
NorthCrab_upload (2025-06-04 21:41:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3768638428
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/852366175

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Map_HeRo (2025-06-16 18:48:21+00:00): Hallo donovaly, Du hast vor 12 Tagen die Relation der stillgelegten Trasse der Werratalbahn bearbeitet. Ich bin aktuell in dieser Gegen tätig und werde in Kürze alle Trassensegmente, die heute vollständig überbaut und vor Ort nicht mehr verifizierbar sind, löschen. Magst Du diese Trassen zuvor noch in die Open Historical Map übertragen? Siehe dazu auch diese Diskussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/loschung-von-alten-bahnlinien/129177/477. 

Gruß Mikke
donovaly (2025-06-16 22:13:45+00:00): Wieso löschst du die Relation? Mir geht es um die Verknüpfung von Wissen. Es gibt einen Wikipedia-Artikel, also ist es relevant. Leute wohnen in der gegend, wollen wissen, wo eine bahnlinie mal lang ging.
Und überhaupt, warum stört dich das? Du kannst ja die Teile, die nicht mehr sichtbar sind als solche kennzeichnen. Die werden dann ja nicht mehr auf der normalen Karte angezeigt. Aber Informationen zu vernichten, das leuchtet mir nicht ein.
Mathias_ADAV (2025-06-06 10:19:25+00:00): Salut, ici il y-a une permeabilité à vélo prévu par le panneau B7b. On peut  passer la place en pedestrian et rajouter zonage
Sébastien Pi (2025-06-06 10:45:40+00:00): Salut Mathias,

Quand tu parles de « zonage », tu veux dire créer une surface « hightway:pedestrian » ?

Il faut que je rajoute la barrière physique qui sépare la zone de rencontre de cette partie d’ailleurs. Je le fais tout de suite.
Mathias_ADAV (2025-06-06 13:12:37+00:00): Oui désolé c'était pas très précis ^^' Vu que c'est une place on peut en effet faire une surface area de la place et le cheminement en highway = pedestrian + bicycle yes ou designated https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian

Je te laisse le faire alors ? Merci !
Sébastien Pi (2025-06-06 18:36:39+00:00): C’est corrigé. Merci pour les informations.
Sébastien Pi (2025-06-06 18:37:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167280556#map=18/50.612507/2.991784
eggie (2025-06-05 08:03:47+00:00): Hi I merged your info with the present addressnode.
Greetz,
eggie
mariotomo (2025-10-13 08:13:23+00:00): hola. no había revisado antes tu contribución. cuidado con la etiqueta 'name'. esta es para los nombres propios de los objetos, no para descripciones.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres
Till_btn (2025-06-19 08:30:54+00:00): Hi, steht auf dem Zusatzzeichen nur "Anlieger frei" oder ein KFZ-Piktogramm daneben? Dann wäre "vehicle=destination" hier die bessere Wahl und für das Zeichen die offizielle Nummer 1020-30
chris66 (2025-06-20 11:01:19+00:00): Auf dem Zusatzschild steht nur "Anlieger frei" ohne Piktorgramm.
Till_btn (2025-06-20 12:38:12+00:00): Super, habe die Tags noch mal entsprechend angepasst
TrickyFoxy (2025-06-05 12:33:01+00:00): 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении
salma_ayman (2025-06-10 12:04:44+00:00): Hi Alsalehq80,
Thank you for your recent edits. However, I noticed that some of the modifications you made in:
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1235779668
Do not align with the information presented in the following news source:
https://x.com/PARTKUWAIT/status/1928126143997300773
Additionally, there are several issues that need to be addressed:
Unacceptable dead ends at:
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/12830149624
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/12830149613
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/12830119400
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/12830149624
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/12404367459
Deleted ways that should be reviewed:
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1234895680
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/47344534
Floating ways that need to be fixed:
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/11288036352
If you're familiar with the area, could you please help by correcting these issues on the map?!
And if you have any other resources, please share them with us!
Best regards,
 salma_ayman
Frans S (2025-07-04 13:10:03+00:00): Hello.  Thanks for the mapping.

I'm afraid you misinterpreted the instructions.

You retagged an area and tag it as place=village 
The original tagging was correct !

The idea is that you tag the mapped area as landuse=residential and add a separate node and tag it as place=village or place=hamlet.
Check the instructions please.

I have modified it.

Kind regards and keep mapping
Hassan Arara (2025-07-04 22:23:14+00:00): Hello, Frans S thanks for your note but i have nothing misinterpreted the instructions 
I taged landuse: = residential
and these place most of them are villages
Frans S (2025-07-05 09:25:02+00:00): Hello. 
Check this way history
514860434
You can see that you indeed tagged the outline as landuse=residential. but added also place=village to it.
The place tag should be placed on a single node. (in the centre)
I hope this is clear now. 
Best regards
berndw (2025-06-08 07:29:02+00:00): Warum löschst Du Restriktionen ohne Vor-Ort-Kontrolle?

An dieser Stelle hätte es durchaus genügt, wenn Du mich angeschrieben hättest, denn es gibt Gründe, warum sie erfasst wurde.
berndw (2025-06-08 07:32:21+00:00): Why are you removing restrictions without on-site inspection?

At this point, it would have been sufficient if you had contacted me, because there are reasons why it was recorded.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-06-08 08:48:00+00:00): access restrictions should be used instead.
czebureks (2025-06-04 23:39:13+00:00): Dyskusja na forum:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kategorie-drog/57996/427
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-13 13:55:15+00:00): is shop=bank adding anything to amenity=bank?

is it in some way different from other banks?
Paolitosss (2025-08-13 15:54:30+00:00): It's just an error. I'll correct it. Thanks!
AndreaDp271 (2025-06-05 08:40:26+00:00): too big area
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167200273
JeroenHoek (2025-06-05 13:26:37+00:00): Why fake?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-06-05 21:09:36+00:00): Any restriction on continuing straight is covered by access and/or oneway tags on the relevant way. 
The restriction made https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1210491993 inaccessible.
JeroenHoek (2025-06-06 06:32:22+00:00): That could hint at either no restriction, or a mandatory left with a posted exception for residents. Which is it?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-06-06 09:01:28+00:00): idk
eggie (2025-06-05 07:59:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Lezurex (2025-06-05 13:20:58+00:00): Hi Spaghetti Monster,

Please explain your edit. What is a "fake" restriction? The restriction exists, as visible here: https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?s=fp;s2;p10d55074-8317-41fb-82d9-25dafbeec278;c98.94/2.78/81;m18.92/47.3806094/8.5122638;vd;bs

No satisfying response within 7 days = revert.

Thanks
Lezurex (2025-06-05 13:24:06+00:00): Hi Spaghetti Monster,

Please explain your edit. What is a "fake" restriction? The restriction exists, as visible here: https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?s=fp;s2;p0fbd95d6-e15c-4af3-9597-5a49a1164d85;c134.66/8.06/69;m20.57/47.388312/8.4907671;vd;bs

No satisfying response within 7 days = revert.

Thanks
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-06-05 21:06:20+00:00): Apologies. It was based off aerial imagery and the seeming absurdity of only allowing left turns when right turns are simpler. I concede I was wrong and have reverted both changesets.
Lezurex (2025-06-06 07:22:30+00:00): Well, assumptions are not a great source for OSM ;D Restrictions are (at least in most of Europe) not visible from aerial imagery, they are mostly signposted only on traffic signs. Besides that, the imagery you used here is outdated for these two intersections.

So please don't map with assumptions, map with facts. You can put assumptions into a note and then someone can check it, but just editing it without really knowing is the wrong way. Please keep that in mind.

Happy Mapping
Lezurex
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-06-06 08:56:32+00:00): This is fantastic. Thank you for writing this out. I have to be honest, I thought aerial imagery was basically a live feed of reality. It never even occurred to me that it could be outdated, or that crucial information might exist on things called "traffic signs" on the actual ground.
Your breakdown of "facts" (from signs) versus "assumptions" (from old pictures) is a complete game-changer for me. I'm saving this as my new guide. It’s a whole new world of mapping now. I can’t thank you enough for this wisdom.
All the best ;D
Lezurex (2025-06-06 09:20:19+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1319040102619410

Again... You are destroying the work of other mappers who have been here in person (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129045654). Unless you can prove to us that you've actually been here, of course.

Please revert your change. Thanks.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-06-06 11:03:27+00:00): The cars in the picture you shared did the maneuver you claim is illegal.
Any access restrictions can be tagged on the road itself.
Lezurex (2025-06-06 11:15:34+00:00): It's because they are residents. The white sign allows going straight for residents and bicycles.

Access and turn restrictions are two separate things, they can coexist. The sign is here, so it should be mapped. It's that simple.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-06-06 23:29:27+00:00): Private/destination can't be tagged on restrictions so a restriction here is just fake data.
Lezurex (2025-06-07 07:17:48+00:00): Of course it can. Just add "destination" to the except tag.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-06-07 22:20:05+00:00): You're suggesting an undocumented unimplemented tag to map a situation that's already fully represented with access tags on the relevant ways?
Lezurex (2025-06-08 12:03:36+00:00): destination is a widely used access value. The except key expects access values. Why shouldn't this work? destination is already used almost 200 times in the except key.
yrtimiD (2025-06-12 14:50:20+00:00): Hi, allow me to not agree with this (major) change. Currently (mapped) vast majority of the city is residential, and there are only few small industrial or commercial areas, so there is no big overlap. Instead of dropping residential completely, it's better to add all "different" kinds of landuse as a holes in the residential relation eliminating any overlap. (of course this will require duplicating current relation and moving landuse=residential to it)
yrtimiD (2025-06-12 16:03:58+00:00): did this extraction in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167540449

will appreciate if such future big removals will be discussed with the local community ahead
Gregory Peony (2025-06-05 14:24:47+00:00): You correctly identified buildings in the imagery however they are generally oversized. This led to overlapping footpritns in the SE; these overlapps stem from poor geometry and should not be resloved by using layer tags, becasue that hides the problem. Accurate building size is also important for accurate population estimates. You can use the shortcut shft+(-/+) to scale selected features after you shape them. --- Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167200860
Gregory Peony (2025-06-05 13:43:42+00:00): All footpritns valid please remember to square or circularise them with q or o respectively. I resolved this in Changeset: 167223453. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Don't let the bad review discourage you. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167200980
Gregory Peony (2025-06-05 03:58:24+00:00): I flagged footpritns which would either be more accurately mapped as square or should not be mapped as building footprins. Hope this helps.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167201003
Gregory Peony (2025-06-05 03:14:40+00:00): All footprints represent buildings visible in imagery and the vast majority are quite accurate. I think the two that I flagged are actually square. well mapped overall --- Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167201073
Rovastar (2025-06-08 12:30:53+00:00): Nice work on this. Let's get them all in. .)
minecraftchest1 (2025-06-05 14:10:17+00:00): Updated wrong Building.
TrickyFoxy (2025-06-05 12:31:48+00:00): 👋 На будущее, Яндекс.Карты, к сожалению, использовать нельзя
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-14 04:44:56+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167598716
user_5359 (2025-06-06 15:43:12+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/12887875961. What is the mean of the tags
CBTC = BitcoinBH
OBTC = UAIBIT
PBTC = https://i.ibb.co/ksDfWf36/IMG-20250604-WA0131.jpg
?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-14 04:45:26+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167598723
Pontificator Extraordinaire (2025-06-05 03:04:21+00:00): Please double check your changes before uploading, you placed an alleyway over a building in this edit
Scythark (2025-06-05 04:40:59+00:00): ok bro I gotchu next time
silversurfer83 (2025-06-05 20:01:21+00:00): Hi :)

ein kleiner Tipp: Nach der Vergabe der Eigenschaften noch die Taste "Q" drücken um die Gebäude schick rechtwinklig zu machen.

happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167202281
voluntary_020 (2025-06-06 03:57:42+00:00): Danke für den Tipp. Will ich gerne machen. Habe mich schon gefragt wie andere das so sauber rechtwinklig hinbekommen.
MfG
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-08 19:42:44+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887943761/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this edit
Would it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )
Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house )

Something else?
EVillan (2026-02-09 17:13:55+00:00): Hi! Thanks for pointing it out. You're right, it should be a hotel. I made a mistake with the tags. I will update it to tourism=hotel right now. Best regards!
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-09 17:35:32+00:00): Thanks! It also looks suspiciously close to road, but maybe it is just next to a narrow road
EVillan (2026-02-10 20:31:05+00:00): Thanks for the follow-up comment. Yes, you are right; the spot is located right next to a rural road, and it is quite narrow.

For context, I determined the location based on the geotagging data from the photos I took at the entrance of the hotel.
whatsDis (2025-06-06 12:29:02+00:00): Привет и добро пожаловать в сообщество OpenStreetMap!
Ваш вклад выглядит отлично — спасибо за добавление полезного объекта!

Небольшое замечание на будущее: будет здорово, если вы немного уточните комментарий к изменениям, например, укажете цель правки и источник данных. Вместо "добавлен объект салон красоты" можно написать что-то вроде "Добавлен салон красоты, основано на полевом осмотре". Это помогает другим участникам лучше понять изменения и сотрудничать эффективнее.

Если у вас появятся вопросы, не стесняйтесь написать здесь. Также будем рады видеть вас в израильском сообществе:
Форум — https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/il/50
Telegram — https://t.me/OSM_Israel

Приятного редактирования!
tguen (2025-09-18 22:01:48+00:00): This building doesn't match any aerial imagery afaict. What is your source? The changeset lists "survey", but it looks like all of your changesets do despite being all across the country so I'm skeptical. 

Also please use better comments and accurate source tags for your changesets.
yrtimiD (2025-06-16 20:52:30+00:00): hi, among all changes you did something strange:
there is a building and a node inside and both have amenity=place_of_workship
I believe this is incorrect as it essentially a duplicate of the same amenity.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1392261827
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9351326777
happilymappingrway (2025-06-17 05:09:01+00:00): I am trying to show the difference between the Patriarchate administration and the church which is on the compound. I was not finished with deciding the best way to transfer tags froms prior entries. I am open to suggestions. Should the church entrance be marked on the map in addition to the church sanctuary itself? The whole compound is walled so this needs further improvement by locals. I do not know where the access point is to the compound or the church.
FajrAl (2025-06-10 15:36:12+00:00): Di OSM, nama jalan tidak disingkat. Jadi namanya menjadi: Jalan Bakti Mulya 2.
Strubbl (2025-06-05 18:05:32+00:00): Ich habe mal deinen doppelten Radweg wieder entfernt mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167234781. Das wolltest du scheinbar auch gar nicht, weil du ja nur schreibst " baumreihe angelegt "
vitacola45 (2025-06-05 19:15:05+00:00): In diesem Bereich gibt einen durch die Baumreihe getrennten Rad- und Fussweg. Ich lege den Rad mal wieder an und widme den Fuss- Radweg um.
Strubbl (2025-06-05 19:36:21+00:00): Ich weiß. Nur das was du kartiert hast, war fehlerbehaftet, siehe oben. Du hast highways überschneiden lassen und du hast highways nicht gescheit verbunden. Außerdem hast du den alten Weg nicht auf einen reinen Fußweg korrigiert. Radwege kartieren ist nicht so einfach, bitte lies vorher im Wiki wie das geht und du größere Umbauten vornimmst: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren
Strubbl (2025-06-05 19:37:00+00:00): Weiterhin solltest du nicht das Bing Kartenmaterial nehmen, sondern das von der Stadt.
Strubbl (2025-06-05 19:37:43+00:00): Könntest du die Baumreihe dann bitte auch noch an den kreuzenden Zufahrten und Straßen auftrennen? Die gehen da nicht über die Straße.
vitacola45 (2025-06-05 19:52:54+00:00): die Baumreihen habe ich angepasst, dass diese an den Einmündungen aufhören.
Welches meinst Du mit den Kartenmaterial von der Stadt?
Bevor ich die Radwege neuanlege lese ich erst mal, wie von Dir empfohlen, die Wiki dazu. Danke Dir.