piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2023-03-03 00:51:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 133232206, 133232218, 133232224, 133232227, 133232225, 133232208, 133232216, 133232213, 133232177, 133232229, 133232203, 133232220, 133232198, 133232180, 133232189, 133224701, 133232215, 133232214, 133232188, 133232199, 133232207, 133232205, 133232182, 133232222, 133232186, 133232200, 133232191, 133232223, 133232209, 133232169, 133232230, 133232194, 133232197, 133232210 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import with unclear licensing in Madagascar
sanchi (2023-02-24 14:21:28+00:00): He revertido este cambio por completo. Por favor mirar el historial antes de editar cambios así. Lo que has trazado dejo de existir con posterioridad a las fotografías aéreas. Actualmente es una rotonda y no pasa la carretera por medio. 
Revisar que es lo que editais desde Mapbox por favor. Gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132938667
Anton_Klebanovich (2023-03-01 08:51:12+00:00): ¡Hola! Gracias por sus comentarios y corrección de errores. 

Hello! Thanks you for your feedback and fixing mistakes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132938667
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-02-23 18:33:15+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 132895456, 132895937, 132896482, 132896603, 132896778, 132897044, 132897258, 132897519, 132897629, 132916805, 132917190.
Syl (2023-03-29 20:28:09+00:00): Bonjour, vous n'avez enlevé qu'une partie des informations, il y a toujours un garage en activité ici ?
woodpeck_repair (2023-03-03 00:50:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 133232206, 133232218, 133232224, 133232227, 133232225, 133232208, 133232216, 133232213, 133232177, 133232229, 133232203, 133232220, 133232198, 133232180, 133232189, 133224701, 133232215, 133232214, 133232188, 133232199, 133232207, 133232205, 133232182, 133232222, 133232186, 133232200, 133232191, 133232223, 133232209, 133232169, 133232230, 133232194, 133232197, 133232210 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import with unclear licensing in Madagascar
AurélienQ (2023-04-04 16:26:39+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai observé vos modifications près du technicentre de maintenance du RER E de Boussiron. J'ai quelques remarques : 
- Le raccordement de la Folie, que vous avez modifié en tant qu'inutilisées (information à vérifier car on voit clairement sur l'image aérienne qu'elles ont été rénovées dans le cadre du RER E), possède un raccord où vous n'avez pas changé les attributs. Il est nettement visible sur la carte. Je vous laisse harmoniser les attributs.
- Le sources que vous mentionnez, vous ne les avez pas ajoutées comme source du changeset, ce qui est pourtant facile à faire. Je vous laisse également les ajouter en commentaires.

Merci pour vos contributions !
Bolt032 (2024-01-11 11:56:05+00:00): should be removed the tag proposed=residential for the way 1015445553.
Because of the proposed tag the road is not routable
dcapillae (2023-02-23 19:33:44+00:00): Buenas tardes.

Este conjunto de cambios fue revertido. El objeto no tiene nombre. La clave «name» no debe usarse para descripciones: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions.

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
dcapillae (2023-02-23 19:37:12+00:00): Si lo deseak, puede añadir una descripción del objeto en idioma eslovaco (sk) usando la etiqueta «description:sk=*».

Por ejemplo,

«descrption:sk= Účelom tejto sklenenej pyramídy je podporiť pozorovanie archeologických pozostatkov existujúcich v podloží a tiež poskytnúť prirodzené svetlo do podložia, ktoré je prístupné z Rímskeho divadla».

(traducción automática español-eslovaco vía Google)
Pavol33 (2023-02-24 07:11:27+00:00): OK.
theFeiter (2023-02-24 09:14:39+00:00): Warum razed:natural, und nicht einfach die Node gelöscht?
theFeiter (2023-02-24 09:18:12+00:00): Der Tag soll nicht verwendet werden, wenn man keine Spur mehr vom Objekt sieht, und es nicht aus versehen neu gemappt werden könnte.
Osmwithspace (2023-02-24 10:36:37+00:00): Ja, kann auch gelöscht werden.
Syl (2023-02-27 18:56:24+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez supprimé une grande partie des bâtiments ici, tout à été rasé ?
Patchanka (2023-03-03 11:08:42+00:00): Bonjour
effectivement ça fait beaucoup de bâtiments supprimés ! C'est possible mais ça semble peu probable. SVP dites nous ce qu'il en est !
Est-ce que ce changeset a un lien avec cette note ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3577568
Julbus (2023-03-07 08:49:43+00:00): Bonjour,
Les bâtiments on tous été mal tracés et je n'avait guère le temps de tout retracer il reste encore les bâtiments du sud du bourg c'est pour ça que j'ai ouvert une note.
Cordialement,                
                                                             Julbus
Patchanka (2023-03-11 13:57:26+00:00): bonjour

merci pour la réponse @Julbus. 

Attention, ce n'est pas un bonne pratique de supprimer ce qui n'est pas assez "bien tracé". Dans OSM tout peut être amélioré ! Si vous n'avez pas le temps, pas de soucis, mettez éventuellement une note pour indiquer une zone où le tracé est à améliorer (ce qui ne veut pas dire qu'un autre contributeur aura forcément le temps ou l'envie de le faire) mais en attendant ne supprimez pas tout ! 
Pour rappel : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques

Entre temps, je vois qu'un autre contributeur a remis les bâtiments. 

Bon weekend
Julbus (2023-03-16 18:18:21+00:00): Merci pour les conseils et d'avoir pris le temps de me répondre :)
bonne soirée
Ar maghsoudi (2023-02-23 22:36:57+00:00): Hello any people use my map need 🛑 please not stop big bills come to your account number telephone houses?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-04-01 16:49:29+00:00): Esta rua existe? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148928087
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-04-01 16:49:42+00:00):  e esta? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1132290939
Baconcrisp (2024-04-01 18:56:31+00:00): Hello,

This account is currently inactive so I looked into this on their behalf. 

Your first link brought up an area so I'm not sure which road your question was about? I modified the second one to better match what is visible in imagery.

Thank you for bringing this to our attention and let me know if you have any further questions!

Baconcrisp
eggie (2023-02-23 20:51:09+00:00): Dag Camille..

Wanneer er inderdaad deze bebording staat is access=private correct.
Het zal nu in OSM niet meer routeren.
MVG
eggie
Camille van der Heide (2023-02-26 14:10:38+00:00): Klopt. Bedankt voor het checken, eggie
DressyPear4 (2023-02-27 02:21:08+00:00): Olá você pode melhorar seu comentário para que outros possam entender o que você está fazendo.
Concentre-se em editar em pequenas áreas também.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132940151
jeslop (2023-02-23 22:04:42+00:00): Hola Evangelia P. ¿Hay alguna razón  para este borrado masivo de datos?
Saludos
--
Hello Evangelia P. Is there a reason for this massive deletion of data?
Regards

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
jeslop (2023-02-24 09:16:06+00:00): Reverted on changeset #132958032.

Jesús López
flohoff (2023-02-28 16:41:40+00:00): Moin,
ich habe gerade diesen Bollard von dir entdeckt:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10689105763

Woher kommen denn die ganzen tags? 

horse=unknown? 

Wenn du durchpasst kommst du durch und bei normalen pömpeln ist das gegeben.

Bei dem "motor_vehicle=no" - Steht da noch ein Zeichen 250/260? 

Weil ansonsten sind pömpel Phyische, keine Rechtlichen Sperren. Wenn du ein Auto hättest was da durchpasst (Was ein CityEL normalerweise passt) dann dürftest du durchfahren.

Flo
eggie (2023-02-23 20:53:12+00:00): Dag Camille... Lijkt me oke als er een bord staat Verboden voor voetgangers.. Anders beter foot=use_sidepath gebruiken.
MVG
eggie
Camille van der Heide (2023-02-26 14:11:45+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
Ik heb bij deze FOOT-tags steeds dezelfde Access-waarden gebruikt die een vorige OSM-er al had toegepast bij de CYCLE-tags zodat het steeds consistent is. Op diverse plekken is er bovendien geen fiets-/voet-pad parallel langs deze weg maar liggen ze verder weg en/of lopen ze in andere patronen dan rechtuit langs deze weg.
Groetjes,
Camille
eggie (2023-02-26 14:22:27+00:00): Hoi Camille...  Het zal best kloppen dat je hier 'beter' niet kunt lopen.
Vaak wordt er toch behouden omgegaan met foot=no...  omdat je als voetganger vaak via de berm kunt lopen. Wanneer je dan foot=no tagt routeert het ook niet meer via de berm.
... en wanneer er geen side_path is heeft die tag ook geen zin.

Het is een beetje een grijs gebied.  Staat er echt zo'n wit bord .. rode rand met een voetganger dan is het wel altijd duidelijk.

MVG
eggie
Maar uptoyou ....
gscholz (2023-02-28 07:44:06+00:00): Hi evgenykatyshev,
your recent edits have left behind a lot of errors regarding not connected ways (red dots):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=28.68448&lat=38.54706&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132940653

As you may know, this ways can not be used by routing software . Can you please fix this? As this seems to be a systematical error, can you please check how to avoid this in future? Hint: Have a look at the warnings this changeset shows.

Kind regards
Guido
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
fabiotofy (2023-02-24 07:08:29+00:00): al civico 3 manca nel nome la dicitura "Via "
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132940684
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
eggie (2023-02-23 20:54:16+00:00): Seems okay
gr eggie
kechan (2023-02-23 21:59:06+00:00): 1000th edit! Congrats
VictorIE (2023-02-25 03:57:10+00:00): Hi,

Did you mean to disconnect 'The Quiet Road' here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2880009807
b-unicycling (2023-02-25 10:41:30+00:00): Oops, no, well spotted
VictorIE (2023-02-25 11:13:56+00:00): OSM Inspector!
emersonveenstra (2023-02-23 21:31:03+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for the contribution! Street names should always be completely spelled out (not abbreviated), would you please change https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232805303/ to "Copper River Avenue Southwest"? Thanks!
Gliranidd (2023-02-24 20:19:52+00:00): The street sign say "Copper River Ave" so let's leave the SW out.  The most important thing is it's spelled Copper and not Cooper
emersonveenstra (2023-02-24 22:19:16+00:00): Well, officially all street names in Kent County have directional indicators, even if it's not specified on the sign, so I went ahead and expanded it, as well as fixed the other occurrences of "Cooper River" nearby
arichnad (2023-03-10 21:09:42+00:00): Hello Jorge,

You are 100% allowed to ride a bike here.  It's private property, so chances are high that you're required to be a renter or visitor of a renter to follow the rules exactly.

bicycle=private is what makes the most sense to me.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Ddismount  is for where riding a bicycle is not allowed.

thank you,

arichnad
GinaroZ (2023-02-24 15:48:24+00:00): Unless these signs have been removed it would seem to be shared use (would be pretty strange for it to be marked as a NCN route whilst only being a footway)
https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=d193ccef-884d-4771-bc82-4c379681f515&cp=56.056031~-3.414989&lvl=17&pi=0&style=x&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027
andrum99 (2023-02-24 16:04:18+00:00): Thanks - I've changed it back. There's a dropped kerb along with a bike symbol painted on the cycleway near the Masterton R/about which, along with lack of blue cycle/pedestrian signs on that stretch, plus the narrow pavement, suggested to me that it was not a cycleway. I have consulted the Fife Council adopted roads map, which says it's a cycleway, so I've changed it back.

It could be argued that an unsigned pavement of a width not designed to be a shared footway is not really a cycleway, but I'm not particularly convinced by that argument in this case.

I don't see any signs in the Bing image you posted. If you mean NCN signs, they don't necessarily indicate that the NCN route is on the footway - it could be on the carriageway. And whether something is an NCN route doesn't really have anything to do with whether the footway has been designated as a shared cycleway by the road authority.
GinaroZ (2023-02-25 12:54:17+00:00): Sorry this should be the correct Bing link: https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=56.058596%7E-3.415517&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=1&style=x&dir=176.5&pi=0
andrum99 (2023-02-25 13:19:29+00:00): Oops - you're right. There are indeed blue shared cycleway signs on that section. My mistake.
Kirstukas (2023-02-26 15:46:45+00:00): 3 etapo (R. Kalantos–M. Gimbutienės g.) dar nebuvo darbų pirkimo, tai nelabai gali ten vykti statybos.
PovilasDew (2023-02-26 20:30:51+00:00): ok
PovilasDew (2023-02-26 20:31:37+00:00): Lauksim žinių, nekantrauju kada turės Kaunas išbaigtą žiedinį aplinkkelį (turbūt galima taip įvardinti).
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-02-27 20:08:48+00:00): Hi, you've removed
highway=footway from here. But I assume you can still walk here at least in non-snowy weather. Map shouldn't be changed back-and-forth every season.

highway=footway or maybe highway=path should probably be returned
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-03-03 17:43:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132946487
added by dgmapping
adrianojbr (2023-03-10 22:35:36+00:00): Olá, Sname!

As imagens da Maxar está mais atualizadas nessa região.

A respeito do alinhamento, é melhor alinhar a imagem com o que já existe.

Abraço!
ftcat (2024-01-01 09:57:45+00:00): Hi KwaXoloXolo,

Is 'slimes dam' not a uniquely South African term for a tailings dam or tailings pond? Either way it is not the name of the dam or pond. Furthermore I don't think the tag landuse=landfill adequately describes the feature, a better tag would be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dtailings_pond. Unfortunately this is not rendered by OSM and would require a campaign to have it rendered, possibly in a similar fashion to a landfill site.
KwaXoloXolo (2024-01-01 14:26:26+00:00): Hi, I don't really disagree and will try and find the specific name in that case. These are significant features on the landscape so to have them not be rendered would be a great pity. In Zim and SA there are hundreds, ranging from rock dumps to slag heaps and coal discard dumps.  All are mine waste and are treated in law as the same as landfills are... so I'm not quite sure what you are suggesting I do?  Must we just leave African landscapes blank?
ftcat (2024-01-01 14:53:28+00:00): Hi, 

I am not suggesting we leave the landscape blank. The best would be to try get tailings pond officially rendered, otherwise we are tagging for the renderer, ie providing a tag to make sure the feature shows up on the map even if it is not an entirely correct tag, this is a big no no in OSM . OSM data is not only used to render the map and can be accessed by many data users in a number of ways. As an example if an organisation wanted to plot the position of all mine tailings dams they would have to filter the data for landfill sites and manually filter for tailings dams by reviewing the available imagery. If the tailings pond tag was used it would be a one step operation. I will contact the proposer of the tailings pond tag to see about rendering, elsewhere I have seen this could be a drawn out process but worth doing in the long run since, as you say, they are a significant feature all over Southern and Central Africa. In todays environmentally conscious world I am sure they are of considerable interest.
KwaXoloXolo (2024-01-01 15:02:07+00:00): Thank you, I get it.  I will happily upgrade the tags on the hundreds of mine "landfills" I have created. And you are right, they are hugely topical for both safety and environmental reasons, which is, in part, my interest.  Take a look at the West Rand, west of Johannesburg or north into the DRC Copperbelt for more of the same...
KwaXoloXolo (2024-01-01 15:08:24+00:00): ...and in Africa I don't know that they are ever called "ponds" - Tailings Storage Facilities also doesn't capture coarse coal discard facilities, slag dumps, waste rock dumps or temporary overburden dumps etc.  I beginning to understand the problem.
ftcat (2024-01-01 15:29:20+00:00): Hi 

I will get on to the mapper that created the tags and see how we go from there. I agree that in Africa they are not called 'ponds', usually slimes dams or mine dumps. In fact we use the term 'dam' to refer to the water held back by a dam wall whereas the technically correct term is 'dam' for the wall and lake or reservoir for the impounded water. In parts of the world the 2 can have 2 different names, Lake Mead in the US is held back by the Hoover Dam for example. Here we say Lake Kariba is impounded by the Kariba dam wall.
KwaXoloXolo (2024-01-01 16:53:02+00:00): Great, thank you.  some part of me still thinks that they are all different kinds of landfill, but will be happy to defer.
KwaXoloXolo (2024-01-01 17:07:03+00:00): Speaking of Southern African English - none of ditch, drain or canal properly captures what a "furrow" is either... nor does a "quarry" with abandoned=yes quite capture "diggings"
ftcat (2024-01-01 17:29:19+00:00): The list goes on. In Zambia and Zim, and possibly Malawi a dambo is a very prominent feature that could be a seasonal wetland but also a grassland depending on the time of year but is not a wet meadow. On many Zambian maps they are shown as wetlands but may have names that include the word plain in them. A dambo with a seasonal pond of water in it is called a pan, this is usually a waterhole in game parks. Many 'swamps' in Zambia are not true swamps but are in fact an ecosystem with their own classification, Zambesian Flooded Grasslands, this includes the Okavango.

This is the problem with a worldwide map with a mainly Western dominance in the classification system.

I have been thinking about slimes dams and tailings ponds. I think landfills more accurately refer to waste dumps while mine waste should have a separate tagging system, tailings ponds being just one of the possibilities. The term tailings I think refers specifically to mine or quarry waste. Tailings ponds are where the waste is a liquid or slurry, that may dry out over time but other waste is in a dry form and may be just heaped, more like a landfill. I will contact the proposer of tailings pond and see what he thinks.
Shaun das Schaf (2023-02-23 21:12:58+00:00): Hi Radovan K, welcome to OSM!

What exactly is that thing that you added? Czech name and operator in a German City nowhere near Czech Republic...? I very much doubt that this is correct.

Best regards
Shaun das Schaf
Shaun das Schaf (2023-02-23 21:15:32+00:00): Hi Radovan K, welcome to OSM!

What exactly is that thing that you added? Czech name in a German City nowhere near Czech Republic...? I very much doubt that this is correct.

Best regards
Shaun das Schaf
Radovan K (2023-02-26 13:39:24+00:00): Stein für Errinnerung
Shaun das Schaf (2023-02-26 17:11:34+00:00): And what is that supposed to tell me now?
Why the Czech name and operator?
Some more details would be great!

Thanks in advance.
Glassman (2023-02-24 18:21:07+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132943451
woodpeck_repair (2023-03-03 00:51:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 133232206, 133232218, 133232224, 133232227, 133232225, 133232208, 133232216, 133232213, 133232177, 133232229, 133232203, 133232220, 133232198, 133232180, 133232189, 133224701, 133232215, 133232214, 133232188, 133232199, 133232207, 133232205, 133232182, 133232222, 133232186, 133232200, 133232191, 133232223, 133232209, 133232169, 133232230, 133232194, 133232197, 133232210 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import with unclear licensing in Madagascar
StephaneP (2024-12-31 10:13:12+00:00): Salut,

Dans ce changeset, tu as décalé les jonctions des bretelles au plus "loin".
Il faut faire le contraire, pour pouvoir utiliser les tags turn:lanes, destination:lanes, etc..

Je suis en train de corriger.
A+
StephaneP (2024-12-31 10:16:49+00:00): J'ai oublié de donner un exemple, en voici un : https://www.osm.org/node/10689374387
fgouget (2025-01-16 11:54:32+00:00): Merci. Je prendrais ça en compte la prochaine fois.
woodpeck_repair (2023-03-03 00:51:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 133232206, 133232218, 133232224, 133232227, 133232225, 133232208, 133232216, 133232213, 133232177, 133232229, 133232203, 133232220, 133232198, 133232180, 133232189, 133224701, 133232215, 133232214, 133232188, 133232199, 133232207, 133232205, 133232182, 133232222, 133232186, 133232200, 133232191, 133232223, 133232209, 133232169, 133232230, 133232194, 133232197, 133232210 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import with unclear licensing in Madagascar
Glassman (2023-02-24 18:29:03+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

It looks like you dragged a convenience store node. I went ahead and fix it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132944042
Allison P (2023-02-24 20:55:42+00:00): The building named "House" that is clearly a detached house didn't raise any flags?
Alexmol (2023-03-06 10:03:21+00:00): Olá.
Para marcar correctamente as torres como tendo antenas DIGI deve-se usar ponto e virgula (e não virgula) para separar os operadores. Também se deve adicionar o MNC correspondente ao operador.
Para mais informação consultar a Wiki em: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:communication:mobile_phone

Alguma dúvida, disponha.
Obrigado
Alexandre Moleiro
Alexmol (2023-03-06 10:05:18+00:00): PS: Tenho um grupo Telegram dedicado exclusivamente às antenas da rede móvel, se estiver interessado o endereço é:
https://t.me/cellmapperpt
bspecht (2023-02-28 09:03:59+00:00): Good work, but I'm not sure it makes sense to remove the old terminal buildings just because they are no longer in use.
Emilius123 (2023-07-06 14:11:06+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted in #138190448. Please see the discussions on the user's newer changesets.
user_6110846 (2023-02-28 07:26:57+00:00): звідки ти взяв що ліс біля Малин Житомирської області має назву Матулянов Соснін ліс 
я 40 років прожив у Малині і вперше стикаюсь с такою назвою
avinet_ua (2023-02-28 17:04:40+00:00): це напівавтоматичний переклад, тому можливі помилки, напиши вірну назву українською і я виправлю
avinet_ua (2023-02-28 17:08:42+00:00): я виправив