piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
iandees (2025-09-28 13:08:00+00:00): Can I ask why you removed the wikidata tag for the Minnesota River? That seems to be the correct tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172551623
CAM-Gerlach (2025-09-28 06:55:14+00:00): INCORRECT CHANGESET SUMMARY; as with the previous changeset, "northwest Hunters Mill Road" should be "northern Hunters Mill Road". My sincere apologies for the multiple mistaken changeset summaries in this session due to not updating the street/area name I was working on. Full corrected changeset summary follows.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172551725
CAM-Gerlach (2025-09-28 06:55:39+00:00): Add road tags for northern Hunters Mill Road of Foxridge Apartments in Hethwood, Blacksburg, Virginia
CAM-Gerlach (2025-09-28 06:54:25+00:00): INCORRECT CHANGESET SUMMARY; "northwest Hunters Mill Road" should be "northern Hunters Mill Road". My sincere apologies for the multiple mistaken changeset summaries in this session due to not updating the street/area name I was working on. Full corrected changeset summary follows.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172551795
CAM-Gerlach (2025-09-28 06:54:45+00:00): Add separate parking areas for northern Hunters Mill Road of Foxridge Apartments in Hethwood, Blacksburg, Virginia
Mashin (2025-09-29 11:33:02+00:00): Hi,
These edits look like an ongoing import. Is there any page documenting it? Or at least a mention of source of these data in the changeset "source" field would be helpful.
infeeeee (2025-09-28 09:26:57+00:00): Szia, ne csináld ezt, ha nincs táblázva nem térképezzük. Problémáidat ne itt jelöld, hanem a Pilisi Parkerdőnél, hogy jelöljék. OSM-en egy fontos szempont a megerősíthetőség: Csak azt térképezzük amit a helyszínen meg lehet erősíteni, bővebben erről itt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability

Ha megint vandálkodsz kénytelenek leszünk a DWG elé vinni az ügyet, amit mi se szeretnénk.
infeeeee (2025-09-28 09:28:16+00:00): A loc_name-nek az jelentése, hogy helyi név. Ha ez a név használatban van egyesek között a környéken, akkor ebbe a címkébe kerülhet, de nem hivatalos, pont erre van. Attól még, hogy te nem ismered nem ok a törlésére.
infeeeee (2025-09-28 09:28:47+00:00): Visszavonva.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172557873
Constable7065 (2025-09-28 11:03:37+00:00): És mégis ezt a nevet ki használja? Pont te írtad, hogy "csak azt térképezzük amit a helyszínen meg lehet erősíteni", és erre semmiféle megerősítés nem létezi. Mi erősíti meg ezt az elnevezést?
infeeeee (2025-09-28 11:14:23+00:00): 9 éve lett felvéve, itt érdeklődj, én nem tudom: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41086037

Pont ezért lett átrakva name-ből loc_name-be mert nincs kiírva. Ha bizonyítod, hogy senki nem hívja így, akkor törölheted, addig miért zavar ha a "Helyi, nem hivatalos" névként szerepel? Semmi megjelenítő nem jeleníti meg, de ha valaki rákeresne, akkor megtalálja.

OSM-en nem nagyon törlünk semmit, ha lehet inkább kijavítjuk.
infeeeee (2025-09-30 13:23:23+00:00): Nevet felvivő szerkesztőtárs ezt írta a névről: 

"Az 57/2013. (XII.21.) önkormányzati rendelet tartalmazza a nevet, tehát használatban van és az e-közmű is hoz rá találatot."
vasony (2025-10-06 16:03:15+00:00): Rákérdeztem a Pilisi Parkerdőnél, ez a válasz jött az úttal kapcsolatban:

Tájékoztatom, hogy a kérdéses út nem áll társaságunk kezelésében, azzal kapcsolatban illetékességgel nem rendelkezünk.

Üdvözlettel:
 x.y.
erdészetvezető
ilias_ (2025-09-28 10:53:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172418648
NeisBot (2025-09-28 06:36:44+00:00): Hallo mlanius, herzlich willkommen und vielen Dank für deine Mitarbeit!

Um die Zusammenarbeit zu erleichtern und anderen dabei zu helfen, deine Änderungen zu verstehen, ist es am besten, eine kurze Beschreibung der von dir vorgenommenen Änderungen hinzuzufügen. Klar formulierte Kommentare helfen der Gemeinschaft dabei, deiner Arbeit zu folgen und bessere Rückmeldungen zu geben. Du findest Tipps zum Schreiben guter Kommentare hier[1].

Basierend auf deinen Karteneditierungen in diesem Changeset habe ich einen Vorschlag dafür erstellt, wie ein Kommentar aussehen könnte: "Website-Attribut im Weg aktualisiert"
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi mlanius, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Updated website attribute on way"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
hlfan (2025-12-08 09:42:52+00:00): Ist das besonders ausgeschildert oder hast du nur an diesem Weg die Standardannahme (access:conditional = no @ flooding) extra getaggt?
DerKaiserschmarren (2025-12-08 11:08:27+00:00): Ein Hinweisschild stand bei; Position; 48.210, 16.225
DerKaiserschmarren (2025-12-08 11:10:09+00:00): Ups, falsch geschieben. Es war bei Position: 48.210543, 16.225513
CAM-Gerlach (2025-09-28 06:52:15+00:00): INCORRECT CHANGESET SUMMARY; "northern Hunters Mill Road" should be "Colonial Drive". My sincere apologies for the multiple mistaken changeset summaries in this session due to not updating the street/area name I was working on. Full corrected changeset summary follows.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172552941
CAM-Gerlach (2025-09-28 06:52:57+00:00): Add road tags and align basketball court for Colonial Drive of Foxridge Apartments in Hethwood, Blacksburg, Virginia
user_5359 (2025-09-30 13:21:47+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1433701340. What is the mean of the tags
kanal = Nej
objektidentitet = 616f7e20-83c4-49c8-a1c7-32569ae23a6e
objekttyp = Vattendrag
objekttypnr = 1581
skapad = 2025/07/08 01:00:01
storleksklass = 1
vattendragsid = 0c622dd1-bddc-43a3-91bc-e92710a58cc8
?
dlebech (2025-09-30 14:15:19+00:00): @user_5359 thank you so much for noticing. The honest answer here is that this line should never have been created. It's identical in shape to way 1433701339 from the same changeset but in the wrong location. It's a copy-paste gone wrong in JOSM, and I have deleted the line now. Sorry for the confusion! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1433701339/history/1
custodiankeyy (2025-09-28 17:22:04+00:00): İsim eklerken genel isim kullanmayın (Örneğin Trafo, kantin). Ayrıca hem alana hem okul binasına ayrı ayrı ismi girmenize gerek yok. İsmi büyük alana girmeniz yeterli.
maplemoths (2025-09-28 20:24:15+00:00): whoops i did not mean to make that changeset humongous, no idea how that happened
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-26 12:35:43+00:00): Hello!

You used
incline=up+
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/409773803/history

Have you maybe meant
incline=up
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Karttakeisari (2025-09-29 05:59:55+00:00): Hi, I believe the amenity=toilet 13176410627 is private and should not be mapped. The nearby cottage is private, and I think this toilet is related to that cottage
emmceegruter (2025-09-29 17:41:28+00:00): Hi, that is possible, I didn't use it. I'll remove it.
hatul (2025-10-19 10:50:56+00:00): שלום נעם
המפה לא מיועדת לניוווטים של הצבא

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173485043
surveyor54 (2025-09-28 08:03:21+00:00): Quelle:
Website;Geoportal NRW-Naturschutzgebiete - Naturschutzgebiete
eggie (2025-09-28 09:03:54+00:00): Dag IS..
Tip.   Probeer op de adresnode bij te taggen.
Er is een adresnode.
..club=sport
..sport=....
Meestal zet ik een clubhuistag erbij. ..amenity=community_centre
Groet..
eggie
eggie (2025-09-28 18:38:13+00:00): De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode.

MVG
eggie
B252697 (2025-09-28 08:22:36+00:00): I walked past Victoria Park earlier today and I realised that the footpaths within Victoria Park were not yet mapped on OSM. So, I tried to map them. While mapping them, I had accidentally made the error of joining the footpaths to the administrative boundary. When checking my edits, I noticed this error. I have corrected this error in this changeset by removing the connection of the footpath to the administrative boundary, and connecting the footpaths to other footpaths along Victoria Park Road instead (i.e. what I saw)
Mannivu (2025-09-28 09:53:54+00:00): Why did you remove surface info?
paolobenve (2025-09-29 11:46:57+00:00): because asphalt seems to be the default, no road has the asphalt specification
Mannivu (2025-09-29 14:32:53+00:00): There's no default for surface in OSM (it would be really bad presuming that), so it should always be explicitly tagged
Dimitar155 (2025-10-07 17:55:02+00:00): Здравей Пламен. Чешмата си е там. Макар и нефункционираща. Намира се на междинното ниво на рампата. Върнах я и ще добавя липсващия таг.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172971296
plamen (2025-10-08 10:15:31+00:00): Пиши- няма вода :)
martinst (2025-10-11 08:36:15+00:00): Way 1433715426:
Richtig wäre hier:
abandoned:highway=path
chrsmsk (2025-10-15 06:28:47+00:00): Nur wenn noch einigermassen gut begehbar/ sichtbar und nicht komplett zugewachsen. Das hab ich in der "Note/ Notiz" angeregt dies nachzuprüfen. ansonsten abandoned:highway=yes
chrsmsk (2025-10-15 06:34:04+00:00): Bsp. Der aufgelassenen Pfad südlich des Schwendterjochs ist grad an der Grenze, man kann ihn noch gehen ohne größere Probleme , aber er verschwindet zunehmend  weil die Forststrasse gebaut wurde. Falls dort Windwurf etc. dazukommt, wird er von abandoned:highway=path zu abandoned:highway=yes. Kann schon die nächsten Jahre passieren. Oder auch nicht, vllt. richtet ihn jemand neu her.
chrsmsk (2025-10-20 10:59:51+00:00): Bitte meine zwei vorherigen Kommentare nicht beachten. Natürlich kann man dass abandoned: highway=path machen.
martinst (2025-10-20 19:56:08+00:00): Genau, übliches Tagging laut OSM-Wiki ist disused:highway=path für Wege, die z.B. stark zugewachsen sind und abandoned:highway=path für Wege, deren Wiederherstellung einen größeren Aufwand bedeuten würde.

Vorteil vom diesem Tagging ist dass Anwendungen wie z.B. OsmAnd die Wege dann noch blass darstellen.
custodiankeyy (2025-09-28 17:13:35+00:00): Bina adı "Yoldaş" mı?
gurglypipe (2025-10-01 08:57:11+00:00): 

Hiya, this edit spans most of the north of England, making it very hard for others to review.

Please be mindful of this and submit changes in smaller, more geographically focussed changesets in future. This should probably have been 7 different changesets.

See also osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks :)
rumixist (2025-09-28 09:53:16+00:00): Trafik Park'daki yolların hepsine amenity=traffic_park ekleyemedim. Ekleyince en dıştaki yolu bir alan olarak algılıyor ve otomatik olarak başka bir şeye dönüşüyor. Bi de ortadaki dönen kavşağa ekleyemedim bunu, onda da aynısı oluyor.
custodiankeyy (2025-09-28 17:10:49+00:00): amenity=traffic_park etiketi alan için kullanılıyor. Bu durumda Trafik Park yazan alana leisure=park yerine amenity=traffic_park etiketini kullanmak daha doğru.

Yollar için highway=service ve (service=driving_exercise veya service=driving_learning) etiketleri kullanılabilir.
rumixist (2025-09-28 19:05:49+00:00): Tamam, trafik park alanındaki leisue=park yerine amenity=traffic_park ekledim ve yollar için service=driving_learning ekledim. Yardımınız için teşekkür ederim.
silversurfer83 (2025-10-21 07:23:45+00:00): Hi :)

the name of the village is already mapped with this node
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1328305363/history/13
so there's no need to add it to the residential landuse. I'll remove it for you.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172559109
SpinOff (2025-12-07 19:38:53+00:00): Wycofane w  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175637244
gurglypipe (2025-09-29 20:34:42+00:00): Hiya, this edit spans most of the north of England, making it very hard for others to review.

Please be mindful of this and submit changes in smaller, more geographically focussed changesets in future. This should probably have been 7 different changesets.

See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks :)
SpinOff (2025-12-07 19:48:18+00:00): Poprawiłem na natural=hill

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:natural%3Dhill
AndyB_66 (2025-09-28 11:28:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
rskedgell (2025-09-28 10:16:09+00:00): * this is actually Banbury Park (BP) CPZ
literan (2025-09-28 10:31:19+00:00): building=ruins это здание, изначально построенное как руина (в парках обычно). Тут нужно указать изначальный тип здания + тег ruins=yes
unkw (2025-09-28 11:01:31+00:00): да вроде как и так, и так можно
("<...> используется для заброшенного и плохого отремонтированного дома или другого здания. Однако некоторые считают, что <...> тег должен использоваться только для зданий, построенных как бутафорские руины.") Но хорошо, поправлю
literan (2025-09-28 11:15:44+00:00): ну в любом случае, общее правило тега building=то, для его оно предназначено

т.е. если в детсаду офис расположили, то все рано building=kindergarten
A67-A67 (2025-10-01 15:53:28+00:00): Hoi Emvee,
Je heb hier twee geldautomaten bewerkt/toegevoegd in Liempde met een website-link en adres in Eijsden (Zuid-Limburg). 

Op de locatiewijzer van Geldmaat zie ik geen automaten op de locatie in Liempde. 

Het gaat om:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13093802286
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13176579528
nevw (2025-10-03 02:06:49+00:00): Hi, I expect this relation is missing it’s outer 
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.80679&lat=-31.93028&zoom=13
nevw (2025-10-03 02:08:37+00:00): This one https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17453705#map=14/-31.93317/115.79191
alexsup21 (2025-09-28 10:26:47+00:00): Zapomniałem dać komantarz: "Mikromapping targowiska po modernizacji"
aharvey (2025-11-12 00:33:28+00:00): Deleted highway=path https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208005959 exists on the GPS traces layer and at least at some point has existed. I suspect it'll still there in some form, but perhaps needs informal=yes and updates to trail_visibility? What's it like on the ground now? When did you last survey here?

Deleted Lookout https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2183037852 does exist https://flickr.com/photos/136319147@N08/23208429036

The other tracks you haven't provided any justification for why you're deleting them, the current situation, when you surveyed etc. beyond just "Fixed" as such I'll revert these deletions.

If the tracks are just not official tracks, mark them as informal=yes.

If they are overgrown use trail_visibility=bad/horrible

If there are signs saying no access use access=no

If the tracks are not used anymore and reclaimed by the bush, use a lifecycle prefix.

Please reply back with further information.
AndyB_66 (2025-09-28 11:28:17+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
AndyB_66 (2025-09-28 11:28:11+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
aharvey (2025-11-12 00:01:07+00:00): I'll restore this under the lifecycle tagging per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Cycling_and_Foot_Paths#Legal_Access

It's clear from other mappers that there was once something here, are you saying it's completely grown over now with no evidence of a path anymore? When did you last survey/check this?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-28 10:41:04+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8469960706
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/912013898

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
VictorIE (2025-09-29 05:04:17+00:00): Hi,

Overlapping buildings: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1433727060
b-unicycling (2025-09-30 09:48:17+00:00): fixed
s777n (2025-09-28 11:39:54+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы достаточно странно изменили магазин. Оставили старое время работы. Убрали теги зоомагазина.  И вместо тегов магазина добавили вендинговый автомат. Исправил
AntMadeira (2025-09-28 20:14:44+00:00): Hello, Mr PT.
Why delete ways correctly tagged as private?

Regards,
António.
Mr PT (2025-09-28 21:52:40+00:00): Because not everybody checks the status of these roads. And some organisations include them in organized rallyes with buggys. And they don't respect the status of our private roads. For this reason we want that these private roads disappear from the map. Because they are private and can't be used by other people. We are also busy to let nature take back these roads because we want other paths on our ground. We are busy to design a petting zoo and we reorganise the complete plot.
AntMadeira (2025-09-29 23:51:10+00:00): Thank you for your explanation.
Whenever possible, this kind of info is very welcome, so that other mappers can understand why this type of edition on the map was done.

Regards,
António.
infeeeee (2025-09-28 12:17:38+00:00): Szia!

Kerítéseket, és terület jellegű dolgokat ne köss hozzá utakhoz, csak baj lehet belőle. Pl itt a kerítést meg a játszóteret is hozzákötötted a mellette levő sétányhoz. Ilyenkor nem lehet eldönteni, hogy a gyalogút a kerítésen kívül vagy belül van. Ezt leszedtem.

Névnek ilyen köznapi dolgokat mint "mászóka" ne adj meg, ez következik a többi címkéből: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség#Elérhetőségek

További jó térképezést!
qstep (2025-09-28 13:20:00+00:00): Köszi a korrekciót, a jövőben jobban odafigyelek.
map_dat (2025-09-28 16:21:06+00:00): Why did you remove the opening hours here?
user_5359 (2025-09-28 16:43:18+00:00): Excuse me, before you make claims, you should check your facts.
bkil (2025-09-28 18:57:25+00:00): Köszönjük a pontosításokat, akadna még sok település ahol ezt javítani lehetne. A fontos szempontok wiki oldal alapján a többségénél én is pixelre pontosan ugyanezeket a javításokat eszközöltem volna, a kisebb részét pedig legfeljebb egy sarkon belüli helyre. Egyetlen céllal nem értek egyet: Tófej. Itt egy körforgalom közepére került ami bár logikailag valóban a település súlypontja körül van, de nincs itt semmi az emlékművön kívül. Északra van az iparterület, állomások, posta, bolt, iskola, így logikailag én a Tófej, vasútállomás buszmegálló környezetét céloztam volna meg.
Bandi_ (2025-09-28 19:23:23+00:00): Igazad van, odébb teszem akkor. üdv,
AndyB_66 (2025-09-28 11:28:01+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
SomeoneElse2 (2025-09-28 11:28:17+00:00): See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171453477 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172508645 .
jb54osm (2025-09-28 14:18:41+00:00): Hi Comino,
You deleted the adressnode, but the building still exists, just like the adress.
Only remove the POI-data.
I'll revert your deletion.
Comino (2025-09-28 14:36:45+00:00): I updated the POI-data.
AndyB_66 (2025-09-28 11:26:14+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Tewuzij (2025-09-28 11:29:54+00:00): Total changes per iD editor: 213
infeeeee (2025-09-28 15:12:20+00:00): Szia!

Ilyenkor nem az épületet szoktuk kettévágni, hanem a korábban az épületen címkézett üzlet adatait átrakni egy új pontra.

Illetve így, hogy a shop=pastry-t jelölted az épületen ÉS a ponton is, így olyan mintha itt két cukrászda is lenne. Egy fontos elv, hogy egy dolgot csak egyszer jelölünk: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Hibáid más szerkesztésekben: 

Facebook oldalak címét a contact:facebook címkében tároljuk. Telefonszámokat mindig nem nemzetközi +36... formátumban kell megadni.

Ezeket javítottam itt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172571589

További jó térképezést!
kuhni74 (2026-02-13 13:40:07+00:00): Hallo! Darf ich Deine Aufmerksamkeit auf die Namensunklarheit (Reitalm / Zwieselalm) in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178503461 lenken? Vielen Dank!
AntMadeira (2025-09-28 20:17:13+00:00): Olá, SilverKnight.
Reparaste na nota que estava na estrada secundária que passaste para terciária?

Cumprimentos,
António.
SilverKnight (2025-09-29 12:08:09+00:00): Olá, AntMadeira.
Não tinha reparado na nota, obrigado pelo aviso, eu já corrigi.

Cumprimentos.
AntMadeira (2025-09-29 23:53:35+00:00): Sem problemas. Obrigado pela rápida reposição.

Cumprimentos,
António.
ika-chan! (2025-09-28 23:11:57+00:00): We can map ways in a park: they could be useful as a shortcut, and Esri World Imagery shows that the ways exist.
FajrAl (2025-11-02 14:23:34+00:00): Bukan aspal, tapi konblok. Saya meragukan hasil survei Anda.
kingkingHK (2025-10-03 14:09:31+00:00): Do you think it will be better to keep the old nodes, only changing them to entrances, both to "keep the history" and to explicitly state that there are two entrances?
vectorial8192 (2025-10-03 15:13:02+00:00): I don't think OSM cares about shop entrances, but maybe I just don't know enough.

If people care enough then they can just look at this changeset and know this new node replaces 2 previous nodes. There is no unified history to speak of when features are erroneously duplicated.
Kovoschiz (2025-10-04 18:29:25+00:00): I don't know why you need to delete both. Can keep one of them, obviously the older one and more changed one, and the other was a `=restaurant`
LKAsahi (2025-09-28 12:09:25+00:00): Source: https://sec.ntu.edu.tw/001/Upload/18/relfile/10344/205651/4cd16f58-267d-4683-9441-20c4cefc5e3d.pdf
keimo (2025-09-29 07:24:43+00:00): Tämä muutos poisti HSL-alueen lähiliikenteen juna-asemista ref-tagit, jotka siis ovat HSL:n pysäkkitunnuksia. Voisitko palauttaa ne?
jplahti (2025-09-29 13:30:11+00:00): Ei mun pitänyt niitä poistaa, mutta vahingossa mennyt. Hyvä kun huomasit. Onneksi ne on helppo palauttaa.
Syl (2026-04-08 06:07:22+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai repris vos différents ajouts en les fusionnant en un seul point. Comme il s'agit du même lieu il ne doit être présent qu'une fois.
rempshaener (2025-09-28 14:30:00+00:00): Hallo,

du hast (versehentlich?) um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Wenn ich mir den Änderungsverlauf anschaue, dürfte
opening_hours=Su-Fr 00:00-24:00; Sa 00:00-06:00,15:00-24:00
richtiger sein.

Viele Grüße
Eren00 (2025-09-28 12:54:10+00:00): Geri alındı. Suburb etiketinin muhtarlığa alınmasına gerek yok. Mahallenin ortasında durması hem göze hemde haritaya uygunluk açısından yeterli olacaktır.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172565566
Eren00 (2025-09-28 12:57:28+00:00): Ayrıca üçüncül yaptığınız cadde, sokak genişliğinde yol olduğu için yerleşim türünde kalması mantıklı olacaktır.
Convectional (2026-01-19 08:59:06+00:00): Do not incorporate public roads or public spaces into residential areas or other such boundaries. 
Do not forcibly merge area boundaries.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172565105
Langlaeufer (2025-11-20 22:29:17+00:00): Das Haus gibt es nicht mehr!
andershl (2025-09-28 13:22:05+00:00): Ahh, I hit the wrong key, getting this change set into the Indian Ocean instead of Greenland. Frustrated - cannot find "revert". Anyone please just remove the change set instead of comment. 
Have to re-learn that part......