piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tekim (2024-05-06 19:49:13+00:00): Thanks for your response.  I can understand how having your changeset reverted is upsetting.  However, I checked and I did revert the correct changeset, one that cited "Google Maps" as its source.  This isn't about "copyright" but rather contract law.  When you accessed Google Maps, you agreed to their Terms of Service, which is a type of contract.  By violating that contract you put not only yourself but the OpenStreetMap project and users of OpenStreetMap data at risk.  The fact that some acceptable source exists to support your edit is irrelevant, you clearly copied from Google Maps in making the edit as that is the source you had cited.  I will once again be reverting the edit.  If you want to redo the edit using only an acceptable source and redo it from scratch (not just reverting my revert) that is fine - just don't use, cite, or reference Google Maps or any other source that is not acceptable.
archie (2024-05-06 21:32:36+00:00): 
Well, I have been around on osm for a while, so don't expect me to cite Google as source.
You got it wrong again I am afraid. The order in time was this:

1. The first cs which cites Google was this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150963789
Made by a newbie. I think this is the one you intended of reverting. 

2.  Then there was this cs: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150964262

3. After this there was my cs: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150964638. I stated as source NVDB, which is open data. No mention of Google.

4. This was followed by your, tekim, cs: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150968186

5. Which was followed by my revert cs: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150968714.

So this was the chain of events.
tekim (2024-05-06 21:44:23+00:00): Ok, something strange happened.  What might have happened is that I reverted the newbie changeset, but you had edited the same feature between the time when they edited it and I reverted, so the revert wiped out both their change and yours?  Anyway, I apologize if that is what happened.  I thought the changeset tool would warn on that condition.
archie (2024-05-06 21:56:25+00:00): Never mind. These things can happen.
silversurfer83 (2024-05-06 14:45:46+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

danke, dass du hilfst du Karte aktuell zu halten.

Eine Frage: Was hast du denn hier gemacht? Mit der verlinkten maproulette challenge scheint es nicht viel zu tun zu haben, oder?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150968266
PhillipTh (2024-05-06 14:53:58+00:00): Hallo silversurfer83,

Da hast du recht. Da hat sich irgendwas falsch verlinkt oder so. Ich hatte die verlinkte challenge aufgemacht um sie mir anzuschauen, die Änderungen die ich hier dann aber veröffentlicht habe gehören zu einer anderen challenge: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/40688

Die Änderungen fügen das passende `club=` tag hinzu bei diesen Vereinen.
silversurfer83 (2024-05-06 14:58:17+00:00): Danke für die flotte Reaktion und die Erklärung :)

Weiter viel Spaß

(eine Kleinigkeit noch: guck mal, dass du die challenges vielleicht etwas kleinteiliger bearbeitest: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets )
Gianfranco2014 (2025-04-23 15:56:13+00:00): Ciao, Potrei sapere da che vecchia mappa l'hai trovato, che volevo verificare. Grazie
Mandux (2025-05-07 17:47:06+00:00): Toponomastica tramandata oralmente degli abitanti della zona, non credo sia scritta in qualche mappa. Se dovessi trovarla fammi un cenno ;-)
vasony (2024-05-12 06:44:38+00:00): Már harmadszor írod vissza, továbbra sem Germanus Gyula park.

https://service-einfoszab.budapest.hu/api/dvd/92950
vasony (2024-05-12 07:13:41+00:00): Reverted your changeset, please do not change back.
This segment of the park is officialy named "Elvis Presley park", the remaining sections remains Germanus Gyula park.
See the attached documentation and/or the street signs.
eggie (2024-05-06 16:11:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
RoadRoamer (2024-05-06 16:21:07+00:00): Bedankt,
Ik heb het bericht ontvangen!
Branko Kokanovic (2024-05-09 15:16:48+00:00): Mi brisemo "ulica" kada je sufiks. "Kosovska ulica" u RGZ-u je kod nas samo "Kosovska". Ako je prefiks ("Ulica Jurija Gagarina"), onda ne diramo! Pogledaj na https://dina.openstreetmap.rs detalje
okuk (2026-03-16 14:34:17+00:00): Ikke sikker på jeg fik gjort det her korrekt. Ændringen må gerne fjernes
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-07 14:26:09+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150985675
tekim (2024-05-08 00:43:14+00:00): reverting fake edit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151033015
gregorywpower (2024-05-06 21:00:57+00:00): Hello Fntokens, please make sure that the data that you add corresponds to what is on the ground.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-07 14:25:36+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150981172
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-07 14:37:29+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150974708
reedyn (2024-05-07 05:56:04+00:00): Snyggt!
StC (2024-05-07 17:00:06+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a supprimé des tags essentiels au réseau pédestre du Grand Toulouse (lwn_name, network:type). Je me charge de les remettre.

A bientôt,

St.
eggie (2024-05-06 16:13:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-12 04:44:04+00:00): Great mapping! Adding a quick note about the new feature in the changeset would be awesome. Thanks for your mapping work! #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150972465
aTarom (2024-05-06 18:01:59+00:00): Hola alonsoaguado, bienvenido, se revierte el cambio, colocar una playa falsa no está permitido, si quieres aportar datos reales a este proyecto y tienes cualquier duda nos lo dices y te ayudamos en los primeros pasos.
Saludos
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-12 07:02:17+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/150977341
martinst (2024-05-06 20:15:39+00:00): Hallo fraaannnzzii,
nach deiner Änderung gibt es jetzt drei Gebäude mit der Adresse Utzschneiderstraße 13.
Könntest Du das bitte noch korrigieren?
Gruß Martin
martinst (2024-05-07 05:52:58+00:00): Hallo fraaannnzzii,
wurde das von dir veränderte Gebäue (Stall) kürzlich vergrößert ? Im Luftbild ist davon noch nichts zu sehen.
Noch ein Tipp: Mit der Taste Q kannst Du Objekte im iD-Editor rechtwinklig machen.
eggie (2024-05-06 17:06:46+00:00): Tip.. het deel onder de overkapping kun je covered=yes taggen.
De eindnodes dan vastmaken aan de kap.
Groet..
eggie
ssandermann (2024-05-06 17:41:05+00:00): Ga ik doen! Eigenlijk wil ik dit deel van het gebouw ook loskoppelen van adres 96 omdat die niet bij elkaar horen, maar wat doe ik met de import-gerelateerde tags op het gebouw wanneer ik het handmatig heb aangepast?
eggie (2024-05-06 17:50:47+00:00): Zou gewoon die "niet BAG adresnode" op het gebouw verwijderen en alleen het adres op de kap zo laten. Dat heet dan schipperen.
eggie (2024-05-06 17:52:13+00:00): Maar je kan ook A67-A67 even polsen, want hij heeft het zo bedacht. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=150973095
A67-A67 (2024-05-06 18:34:32+00:00): Op zich lijkt me het hier niet erg dat er 2x het adres Oude Beekbergerweg 98 voorkomt. Het tankstation heeft dat adres en het huis (of winkel?) ernaast ook.

Verder kan deze omgeving wel een BAG-update gebruiken. Dan kan meteen het dak van het pand met huisnummer 96 gescheiden worden.
eggie (2024-05-13 16:51:28+00:00): reverted by changeset #151276159

Wrong interpretation aerial imagery!

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-05-06 17:09:17+00:00): Dag orosus

Het best kun je die info combineren met de adresnode op het gebouw.

Mvg
eggie
eggie (2024-05-06 17:59:25+00:00): Hi I merged your info with the present addressnode.
Greetz,
eggie
archie (2024-05-06 16:54:42+00:00): Hej, du använder Bing som bakgrund som du inte har justerat innan du började editera. Detta har medfört att du flyttat/ritatat in nytt med en offset, dvs i fel (förskjutet läge). 
Satellitbakgrunder - i synnerhet Bing - måste justeras lägesmässigt innan du kan använda dem. Annars blir allt felplacerad. 
se för anvisningar: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_aerial_imagery
eggie (2024-05-13 16:48:58+00:00): Hi please never look to the roofshapes.
Please stop changing buildings in the Netherlands.
I will revert your edits.
Have a nice day
eggie
eggie (2024-05-13 16:49:28+00:00): reverted by changeset #151276055
eggie (2024-05-13 16:45:09+00:00): Hi ila   Never look to the roofshapes, That is not the right spot.
All buildings in the Netherlands are import from the Dutch registry. I will revert your edits.
Greetz
eggie
eggie (2024-05-13 16:46:11+00:00): reverted by changeset #151275952
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-07 14:36:40+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150981268
citrula (2024-05-06 19:11:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM ! You can use building=carport for the covered parking, rather than deleting the buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150974858
aTarom (2024-05-06 18:13:28+00:00): Hola adr_rod, bienvenido/a, se revierte el cambio, si tienes alguna dificultad para añadir elementos a OSM te podemos ayudar, si se trata de colocar elementos ficticios no está permitido
Saludos
monhiko (2024-05-07 02:03:57+00:00): 几个问题：
其一，社保服务中心和服务站你是用点标注的吗？因为点下面没有对应的建筑诶。。。（退役军人这个建议还是不标了吧。。。）
第二，为什么小学的田径跑道会在小学外面？而且是面标注？跑道一般是用线标注的（参考靖西中学），如果在建可以先不画；而且，小学里面的内容好少，建议多画点（参考靖西四小）
第三，真的有一条路叫做“排洪路（Paihong Road）”吗？还是说这是排洪用的路？建议再核实下，然后乡镇里的路如果像这种规模不到1500人的乡镇的话道路我个人推荐使用“小型/未分级道路”
第四，建筑好少。。。
最后，算是无关紧要的，我是靖西人，不是百色人o(╥﹏╥)o
shu0410 (2024-05-07 02:29:28+00:00): 感谢monhiko提的建议😭
第一个问题，退役军人服务站我已经删掉了，没有对应建筑是因为我在bing的卫星图上实在看不见建筑在哪
第二个问题，操场我已经删掉了，但是建筑我只看出来这几个😂可能是卫星图落后了，也可能学校设施比较简陋
第三个问题，排洪路我无法核实，因为我没有亲身去过，这些名字（小学，幼儿园，法院……）都是根据百度地图上来的，我也不清楚百度地图的数据和现在究竟差了多少，这也是我想提出的问题了：我清楚不能用盈利性地图的数据，可我还能从哪拿到数据来补充地图😂我最近再把国道旁的建筑和延伸出去的小路再加一加，争取密度跟您齐平😂
GEO ECLA (2024-05-21 09:51:20+00:00): BAL mise à jour le 16/05/2024 :
https://adresse.data.gouv.fr/base-adresse-nationale/39251_0015#16.27/46.63955/5.5008
Julien39 (2024-05-22 13:32:53+00:00): Très bien, je supprime alt_name qui n'a donc plus lieu d'être
marc__marc (2024-08-05 22:22:46+00:00): Bonjour,
les prises type 2 ne permettent pas de délivrer 350 kW, c'est probablement du socket:type2_combo mais le voltage de ces prises n'est alors pas du 230v mais du 400v ou 800v
Selon le site d'Electra, c'est même du 400 kW https://stations.go-electra.com/fr/jette-delhaize-arbre-ballon/
je vous laisse corriger car j'ignore la source que vous avez utilisé (utiliser la carte comme source me semble un non sens, je suppose que vous avez-vous renseigner l'imagery_used mais du coup j'ignore votre source)
Cordialement,
Marc
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-06 19:01:56+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kategorie-drog-w-woj-pomorskim/111839/51 ?

Nawet jak taka zmiana jest dobra to warto się zapytać przez jej zrobieniem.

Zwłaszcza jak jest opór.

"zweryfikowane w BIP" co w BIP zostało zweryfikowane?
szalona_entropia (2024-05-07 08:20:27+00:00): Nic nie zostało, użytkownik jest do zbanowania.
szalona_entropia (2024-05-07 08:23:04+00:00): Tu jest przebieg DK21: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20230000455/O/D20230455.pdf
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-12 07:01:56+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150972583

Thanks @ aTarom !
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-06 18:10:45+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11884637293

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MxxCon (2024-05-09 03:56:10+00:00): It should be not url= but website=.
However, looking at that website, it seems to be just a listing aggregator (kinda like yelp) and not a actual website of this business, and we don't link to aggregators.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150977804
IraGersh (2024-05-09 17:47:24+00:00): Removed it.
bxl-forever (2024-05-06 18:20:01+00:00): Hello,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I had a look at your edit.  We had to change a few things, as we’d rather not mix it with the building, and data like the postcode or full address does not have to be repeated on every single object.  The restaurant is here: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11884628043
leepyd (2024-05-06 18:26:48+00:00): Hello, thank you very much for your responsiveness, sorry for the mistakes! I’ll study your handbook to deepen my understanding of OSM edit
ftrebien (2024-05-11 20:35:22+00:00): Lifecycle tags should be used for all tags related to the destroyed feature according to the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#How_to_tag
WC392309 (2024-05-25 14:32:23+00:00): I would understand these changes, however, SR 772 is a more important route than a lot of the other secondary routes like SR 645 and SR 774. Yes, it's not as important as routes like LCP and Northstar but it's in a difficult position. Either SR 772 can get re-upgraded to primary or some of the secondary routes can be downgraded to tertiary
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-06 19:00:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11884671605
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229068405

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-05-06 19:11:45+00:00): Oke.. geopend.. Ik heb wel access=no verwijderd. Het zou anders niet routeren. 
Groet
eggie
Syl (2024-05-22 15:35:49+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai corrigé 2 caméras en remplaçant l'attribut "note" par "description". "description" sert à renseigner des informations supplémentaires qu'il n'est pas possible d'ajouter avec des attributs, tandis que "note" sert à transmettre des informations aux autres personnes contribuant à OSM.

Et sinon, dans le cas où il est clair que ces caméras sont hors service pour longtemps, l'attribut principal doit être modifié avec disused: devant la clé (comme on le fait par exemple pour les fontaines d'eau potable sans eau toute l'année). Je vous laisse voir si ce serait à corriger.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-09 00:52:39+00:00): Whats up with this?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1275912205
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-06 19:40:44+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150980625
spatialia (2024-05-06 19:42:27+00:00): As a note to anyone reviewing these upgrades in the future, I also think D street from McKinley to at least 45th, if not further, has features consistent with a tertiary, but it's narrower and probably has lower traffic, so I didn't upgrade it.

Similarly, 45th from about Bertha Henschel Park to J is very tertiary-like, but probably lower traffic than some of these others and serves less cross-neighborhood traffic and more funneling of people to H and J, so I didn't upgrade them yet.

It's also possible that 39th from McKinley to H isn't quite tertiary, but the rest of it is and I thought it made sense to connect the route through to at least McKinley.

Last, if one were to upgrade those, I think Elvas would probably than be secondary along its length. It might be anyway, but it's a much higher class than the rest of those and much more similar to H than it is the neighborhood through routes. For now, leaving as is to not overclassify the neighborhood.
archie (2024-05-06 20:39:54+00:00): Tyvärr har du flyttat rätt placerade objekt till fel läge igen. Vänligen sluta med detta. 
Sedan klistrar vi inte ihop highway och landuse.
d3mol3k (2024-05-08 15:39:17+00:00): tu też nie ma rozdziału dróg proszę o przywrócenie stanu poprzedniego
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-07 14:32:04+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150933432
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150947934
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150952132

Thanks @ salisburymistake !
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-26 15:19:53+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3741969926/history has shop = fast_food that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=fast_food ? Is it amenity=fast_food ? If not, what this tag is intended to mean? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfast_food
Spush (2024-10-26 15:28:09+00:00): It was a greengrocer before  and I forgot change tag. THX.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-07 14:36:56+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150974708

Thanks @ salisburymistake !
DD1GJ (2024-05-07 07:49:45+00:00): Revert, zwei stark verschobene Wegpunkte. Siehe obige Warnungen.

Die bisherigen Eintragungen waren korrekt. Falls der "Strand" mit Pokémon Go zusammenhängen sollte: 
https://pokemon-go-forum.de/threads/pokemon-go-spieler-zerstoeren-open-streetmaps.3160/
StC (2024-05-08 09:57:37+00:00): Hi,

this changeset has triggerered a discontinuity in a hiking route. I will make the repair.
chris66 (2024-05-09 19:49:40+00:00): Hi,
Du hattest Bramsche wohl versehentlich zerstört, die Community hat's aber bereits repariert :-)

Grüße
Langlaeufer (2026-03-02 16:14:39+00:00): 2023 war die Marktstraße verkehrsberuhigt. Dann wurde zeichen 244 (Fahrradstraße erfasst. Erfasst war und ist immer noch Fußgängerzone. Was ist es nun wirklich? Welche Zeichen stehen da?
VladaC (2024-05-10 22:34:50+00:00): Ahoj, v poslední době jsem tam nebyl, tak do toho nechci zasahovat. Ale obecně - pokud jsou můstky ve špatném stavu, tak bych to primárně značil pomocí smoothness=* a surface=*. Highway=* označuje "účel" cesty, ne kvalitu povrchu. Teď tam vidím smoothness=excellent a surface=asphalt.
DD1GJ (2024-05-07 07:30:16+00:00): Hallo Hendrik,

es war (fast) richtig hinterlegt und die Navi-App hätte es eigentlich erkennen sollen. Die Router behandeln diese Kombination leider unterschiedlich. Um welche App handelt es sich? 

In Deine Korrekturen hatte sich überall ein falsches cycleway=crossing eingeschlichen. Das ist nur für Fahrrad-Straßenübergänge ähnlich Zebrastreifen. Ebenso ist highway=cycleway für reine Radwege ohne Fußgänger gedacht. Deshalb verwenden wir bei gemeinsamen Fuß-/Radwegen das neutrale highway=path mit einem designated für foot und bicycle. Ich habe alles angepasst.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:bicycle%3Ddesignated

Viele Grüße, Joachim

PS: jetzt gibt es in Hamburg nur noch 792 Wegstücke mit diesem "Problem"  ;-)
Jerry_W2k (2024-05-07 11:26:14+00:00): Jak bezpodstawne, żadne zarządzenie czy BIP nie zmienia klas dróg prowadzących do lotnisk w OSM
DD1GJ (2024-05-06 22:18:34+00:00): Löschung rückgängig gemacht. Wege zusätzlich als Privat und Sackgasse gekennzeichnet. Es war bereits zuvor klar ersichtlich, dass es hier keinen Durchgang gibt.
bpotzale (2024-05-06 22:23:52+00:00): Die Wege befinden sich auf meinem Privatgrundstück. Somit sind sie aus der Karte zu entfernen.
Syl (2024-05-08 12:47:03+00:00): Bonjour, pour la médecine du travail c'est plutôt healthcare:speciality=occupational.
Je viens de corriger
gileri (2024-05-08 17:50:47+00:00): Bonjour, merci !
Dino Michelini (2024-05-07 12:38:15+00:00): Ciao vedo che sei alle prime armi con OSM per cui ti segnalo alcuni errori commessi nel mappare. Alcuni tag sono usati impropriamente in quanto i valori immessi sono di defaut e di solito si inserisce solo “no” e per layer il livello diverso da “0”.
Bicycle yes -> cancellare
Foot yes -> cancellare
Horse yes -> cancellare
Layer 0 -> cancellare
Il name non può essere un codice (sigla) che va immesso nel tag ref. Per name si intende l’effettivo nome del percorso
Name MLG3 -> cancellare
Surface ground
Tracktype non va usato insieme a Surface che si usa solo con highway=track
Tracktype grade4 -> cancellare
Per mappare ed evitare altri errori da correggere ti consiglio di leggere la wiki di OSM:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route
forno fusorio delle Ferriere Pontificie (8567300544) il name è in realtà una descrizione quindi il tag name va sostituito con description
Tenuta Monte la Guardia (2024-05-09 18:03:43+00:00): Ciao Dino,
grazie per le indicazioni,
ho rimosso la gran parte dei tag secondo le tue indicazioni.
I sentieri MLG1, MLG2, MLG3, MLG4 si chiamano effettivamente così in quanto è la nomenclatura che è stata data ai sentieri e che è indicata sui cartelli segnavia presenti sul posto,
vedi www.tenutamontelaguardia.it per info sul progetto in corso.
Se hai altre osservazioni sono decisamente ben accette.
Un saluto.
GrumpyGorilla (2024-05-06 21:30:17+00:00): Review requested because this is my first time editing roadways. I think the cyclepath on the other side needs brought closer (inside the line of trees), but I need to confirm where that starts
eggie (2024-05-07 07:43:25+00:00): Dag GG 
Je vraagt feedback 
Wanneer er een fietspad ligt kan van de hoofdrijbaan cycleway=lane verwijderd worden.
In case there is a seperate cycleway there is no need for cycleway=lane on the mainroad.

De voetgangers-oversteken eindigen op de hoofdrijbaan met food=no.
Your footwaycrossings end on the mainroad with food=no

Hebben de H Gorterstraat en de G Gezellestraat geen verbinding met met westelijke fietspad?
These roads aren not connceted with the western cycleway?

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-05-07 07:46:59+00:00): My edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=150996064

I removed the cycleway=lane tags from the mainroad and added bicycle=use_sidepath.
Gr eggie
GrumpyGorilla (2024-05-07 20:54:12+00:00): Thanks for the feedback.

I've fixed the issue with the allowed foot traffic (#151028179)

And tweaked the cycle path so it connects on the western side (#151028396), but I'm not sure if this is what you were suggesting.
eggie (2024-05-07 21:10:11+00:00): Don't worry..
I will have a look to morrow.
Gr eggie
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-11 03:14:13+00:00): Hi PacOce,
What's with all the random inaccurate beaches you are adding around this location?
Kuatsystems (2024-05-11 05:50:46+00:00): That is not good, my kids play Pokémon and they wanted me to add beaches all around water, I told them that wouldn’t happen but that would add sand to areas that look like are sand, it looks like one of them went in and changed it to beaches, I’ll fix that, thanks for catching that.
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-11 07:06:39+00:00): Hi PacOce,
Thank you for your reply here, I really appreciate it. 
It's probably going to be a long time before Niantic updates the map data they use for biomes.
It looks like Oquirrh Lake just a bit south of where you've been mapping has had several beaches mapped for a few years - I'd wager that if you take the kids down there, you'll probably find Wiglett much sooner than you would by adding beaches inside suburban water retention basins.
Kuatsystems (2024-05-11 07:20:20+00:00): I appreciate individuals like you to help keep things neat, I feel really bad that this happened, password is already changed. Good to know about oquirrh lake haven’t been there but it’s worth a trip! Thanks again and I’ll watch my edits more closely, I see you have already fixed all the ones I’ve seen, if you’ve missed any I’ll be sure to fix them!
felipeeugenio (2024-05-06 22:03:40+00:00): Hola, por favor no hacer test que queden grabados. O por lo menos que no sean correr una calle varios metros.
saludos
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-07 08:37:33+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150984685
jtracey (2024-05-06 21:42:40+00:00): Resolves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4232763
bxl-forever (2024-05-06 21:58:22+00:00): Hello,

I see that the following tags are still set on the object, which somehow contradicts the changeset destription.

payment:mastercard=yes
payment:visa=yes

Shall we remove those too?

(Yes, it looks like a previous mapper added a whole bunch of payment:* tags here, which can be a little painful to review and clean up.  That might explain the confusion)