piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-02-24 16:18:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1341656435 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Transmission service"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-04 17:33:08+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179360659
(No visible changes after review)
mykhal (2026-02-24 16:37:43+00:00): (.. well, not exactly "revert" in wikipedia/wikidata/mediawiki sense)
trallalallalaa (2026-03-09 13:19:44+00:00): Más información:

Se ha abierto el tramo recuperado de la LP-211 (Carretera El Hoyo Todoque) el 1 de noviembre 2025:
https://cabildodelapalma.es/es/la-carretera-de-todoque-sera-transitable-desde-este-sabado-reduciendo-la-conexion-entre-norte-y-sur

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179585320
14im (2026-03-08 22:18:02+00:00): Plutôt qu'un "community_centre", il s'agit plutôt d'un "kindergarten".
La modification https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8234038788 eut été certainement plus judicieuse.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-03-09 13:53:45+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour l'alerte, nous n'avons pas utiliser le noeud 8234038788 car il était marque , déprécié ne pas utiliser. Nous avons modifié la catégorie de l'autre noeud Bonne journée
eggie (2026-02-24 19:18:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-24 18:43:53+00:00): Dag SJ Probeer svp op de adresnode bij te taggen.
Mvg
eggie
rarad74 (2026-02-26 10:10:33+00:00): Hi. Why you missaligned the primary road DN1 here? This road was aligned by GPOX tracks. When there are available GPX tracks this MUST be used as a primary source of position, not images. Please DO NOT missalign again main roads. Thanks.
BakoyeRiver (2026-02-26 17:23:40+00:00): Hello Rarad74, thank you for your input,
Upon further review, this does align with GPX tracks, as well as imageries such as Mapbox that align with the tracks. I will be more mindful of this moving forward.
SomeoneElse (2026-03-02 22:57:20+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
If the things that you are drawing are rectangular - and I'm guessing that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1482610940 etc. are - you can square them up by pressing "q" in the editor.
Best Regards,
Andy
DanhengOSM (2026-02-25 02:11:20+00:00): 建议：请把这些已经在卫星图上难以辨认的铁路要素移至OpenHistoricalMap，谢谢
NeisBot (2026-02-24 17:09:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1482613262 v1 | 9 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178999375
osmviborg (2026-02-25 06:12:07+00:00): Broen hedder 'Bryggebroen' https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/379073131
kylor (2026-02-24 18:30:35+00:00): 179 mil woo
NeisBot (2026-02-24 17:27:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13596078206 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "HVAC contractor building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-04 17:33:11+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179360664
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Kamil Kalata (2026-02-24 21:33:59+00:00): Witaj!
Cieszę się, że postanowiłeś dołączyć do OpenStreetMap! Chciałbym jednak zwrócić Tobie uwagę na kilka błędów.
1. Oznaczyłeś drogę biegnącą przez wieś (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32942740, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32942741) jako highway=trunk. Ten tag służy do oznaczania dróg ważnych w skali międzynarodowej, a ta droga na pewno takową nie jest, zwłaszcza że niedaleko znajduje się droga ekspresowa S10 (więcej o tagu tutaj: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk). Nie mapuje się także specjalnie tak, żeby mapa wyglądała ładnie (więcej tutaj: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Celowo_błędne_tagowanie_pod_renderer).
2. Nadałeś wielu obiektom nazwy opisowe, które są zbędne, przede wszystkim dlatego, że powtarzają informację zawartą w innych tagach (więcej tutaj: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki#Nie_u.C5.BCywaj_tagu_name_do_opisywania_rzeczy).
3. Niepotrzebnie dodałeś tagi min_age oraz max_age do placu zabaw (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1180165701). Jeżeli wartość jest nieznana, to nie trzeba tych wartości dodawać. Ze zdjęć lotniczych wnioskuję, że mogłeś oznaczyć nawierzchnię =grass, jako dominującą.
4. Lapidarium (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/878011948), o ile istnieje, nie jest ani miejscem kultu (raczej), ani budynkiem (na pewno, nie widzę jednego wielkiego budynku na zdjęciach lotniczych). Ponadto, to lapidarium już zostało dodane (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8168867613).
5. Remizy oznacza się tagiem amenity=fire_station (więcej tutaj: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity=fire%20station). Twoje oznaczenie tej w Niedźwiedzi (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532776475) jest w tym wypadku błędne.
6. Ze zdjęć lotniczych wynika, że ta "bieżnia" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361920697) nie  jest bieżnią, tylko boiskiem.
Niestety, ale będę zmuszony wycofać te zmiany. W razie kłopotów pytaj tutaj: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/pytania-poczatkujacych/52707.
pwbriggs (2026-02-25 20:05:37+00:00): Thanks. I added back some info you removed instead of reformatting. Was there a reason you removed e.g. phone=*?
Glassman (2026-02-25 20:32:35+00:00): Mainly because I'm tired of SeO companies dumping trash in OSM that we have to fix. This one was close to just being deleted.  Over the years, I've seen so many garbage SEO edits that I'm just tired of them.
pwbriggs (2026-02-25 23:25:52+00:00): 100% agree. Just wanted to make sure there weren't data quality issues you were aware of.

Happy mapping!
Kamil Kalata (2026-02-24 21:38:00+00:00): Witaj!
Chciałbym Ciebie zapytać, czy przejście dla pieszych na ulicy Szkolnej (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13596103146) w ogóle istnieje. Na zdjęciach lotniczych nie widzę go, a zadeklarowałeś, że to na ich podstawie to przejście dodałeś.
kot europejski (2026-05-15 20:21:04+00:00): Przypadkiem trafiłem na ten komentarz. Poszedłem sprawdzić i przejścia nie było. Usunąłem je w changeset/179000376.
kot europejski (2026-05-15 20:22:44+00:00): oj to nie ten link, powinien to być changeset/182716805
Kamil Kalata (2026-05-15 20:25:47+00:00): Dziękuję bardzo, @kot europejski, za weryfikację tego przejścia. Sam zdążyłem już zapomnieć o tej zmianie, szczególnie, że nie jestem w ogóle związany z tym regionem.
rhhs (2026-02-24 19:47:14+00:00): As you can see, my surveys are slowly moving south through Studentski grad, so I hope to soon reach Manastirski livadi and check completion of buildings there. If you want you could wait for that.
rhhs (2026-02-24 19:48:12+00:00): Sorry, I mean Malinova dolina
Fraxi (2026-02-24 20:15:09+00:00): Исках да вкарам адреси. Но като не съм абсолютно убеден в статуса на сградите, по-добре е да го поотложа... Наистина най-добре ти да ги видиш. Видеото е от над 3 месеца все пак.
trallalallalaa (2026-03-09 13:17:12+00:00): Más información:

Se ha abierto el tramo recuperado de la LP-211 (Carretera El Hoyo Todoque) el 1 de noviembre 2025:
https://cabildodelapalma.es/es/la-carretera-de-todoque-sera-transitable-desde-este-sabado-reduciendo-la-conexion-entre-norte-y-sur

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179585197
eggie (2026-02-24 18:47:20+00:00): Welkom bij OSM..
Probeer svp bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode.
Mvg
eggie
Rainero (2026-03-13 11:38:20+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179804781
(unzulässige Quelle)
eggie (2026-02-24 19:23:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  De naam van de centrale komt nu 2x voor op de kaart.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-24 18:45:42+00:00): Dag Joshua.. Probeer svp op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen.
Mvg
eggie
felipeeugenio (2026-02-24 20:08:45+00:00): Hola. Buenas tardes.
Claramente no hay un salto ahí. Puede indicarnos por favor el lugar exacto?
gracias.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179001442
Pablo Rubilar (2026-02-24 20:29:24+00:00): Hola. Buenas tardes.

Para llegar al salto tienes seguir por la ruta T-865 - hasta el puente  (el salto esta señalizado en nel puente) y se segue el camino a la izquierda ruta T-833 aproximadamente unos 300 metros desde el puente y se encuentra señalizado el salto a un costado derecho del camino.
felipeeugenio (2026-02-24 21:34:01+00:00): Ok, tuve que buscarlo en internet. Queda Puente abajo. En OSM trabajamos con el lugar exacto de las cosas, no donde están señalizadas. Pero gracias.
Pablo Rubilar (2026-02-24 21:41:03+00:00): El lugar es el exacto, tengo imágenes y ruta en gps para compartir
tanzwiese (2026-07-01 21:43:00+00:00): Is "Beleuchteter Pfad" really a commonly used name for this part of the way? I (and many of my friends) have been knowing and referring to it (as a Fusion guest only, however), as "Hauptweg" since years…
th62pi (2026-07-02 06:52:06+00:00): Es gibt schon beides. Ist halt ne Anspielung auf https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sendero_Luminoso
Ich hab "Hauptweg" bisher als funktionale Bezeichnung verstanden, so wie die meisten Hauptstraßen auch nicht "Hauptstraße" heißen.
Oder ist der Weg in Wirklichklichkeit nach Eule benannt, so wie der EulenHPTTRSN?
tanzwiese (2026-07-02 14:02:40+00:00): Oh wow, so habe ich den HPTTRSN noch nie verstanden :-)

Ok, da du scheinbar tiefer mit dem Kulturkosmos involviert bist, musst du das entscheiden. Man könnte auch name=Hauptweg und alt_name=Beleuchteter Pfad nehmen.
NeisBot (2026-02-24 18:12:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1465275074 v1 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1465275075 v2 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13439356748 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179002067
MappingMore (2026-02-25 11:47:50+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179032957
Rainero (2026-04-10 21:29:04+00:00): Revert in changeset/181168784, um die ursprüngliche Sankt-Anna-Klosterkirche wiederherzustellen.
Tris_1220 (2026-02-24 19:32:17+00:00): I deleted the node again, since you already added it in your previous changeset. So that there are no duplicates in the map.

My changeset: https://www.osm.org/changeset/179004982
OldManCelli (2026-02-24 18:53:40+00:00): Hello. It looks like you created a self intersection in the relation 11042185. Can you please try to fix it.
TalalQ8 (2026-02-25 19:09:10+00:00): would u please help to adjust this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179002649
FajrAl (2026-03-01 03:43:05+00:00): I noticed you changed the Singapore-Indonesia border back to its previous state. Since we discussed this in changeset/175054892, I wanted to ensure we're on the same page. My recent edit (changeset/175293862 https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175293862) follows the formal UN treaty specifications https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=08000002804cce54. Is there a specific reason for the rollback?
NeisBot (2026-02-24 18:30:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 14 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1482631863 v1 | 14 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179002731
NeisReview (2026-03-05 05:33:19+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179047616
eggie (2026-02-24 19:24:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-24 19:32:48+00:00): Tip .. Let er op dat je de paden doorverbind met ander wegen of paden.
Het zal anders niet routeren.

MVG
eggie
CAM-Gerlach (2026-02-25 15:40:05+00:00): Hi NRV Privacy Advocate,

Thanks for verifying and updating these ALPRs and adding some additional useful tags to them. As a card-carrying EFF and ALCU member, I appreciate the work of those like yourself to document and bring attention to the increasingly invasive and pervasive surveillance measures we are becoming surrounded with, especially in this area of unprecedented weaponization of state resources against those that disagree with its current policies.

I did want to point out one thing with the changes here, namely that the cardinal principle of using the `wikipedia` (and `wikidata`) tag is that it should correspond 1:1 with the _specific_ feature being mapped (i.e. that one _specific_ camera). The wikipedia/wikidata entry for a owner, operator, brand, manufacturer etc. of a feature belongs as a secondary wikipedia/data tag, in this case `manufacturer:wikipedia`, as you can already see done with `manufacturer:wikidata` for these same POIs you edited.

Also, while I've used it a lot in the past, just to note consensus has been recently shifting toward using only `:wikidata` secondary tags (with an approved automated edit removing all `brand:wikipedia` tags in the United States: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposed-bulk-removal-of-brand-wikipedia-tag-from-united-states-pois/107776/ ), since it is essentially redundant with `:wikidata` which links to every Wikipedia article plus much more, and Wikidata IDs are stable while article titles are not.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-02-25 15:40:23+00:00): In changeset #179040841  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179040841 for all ALPRs in the Blacksburg/Christiansburg area, I've corrected the `wikipedia` links added here to `manufacturer:wikipedia`, as well as fixed other instances of the same (and with `wikidata`), added `operator:wikidata` where possible, moved a few instances of the `power` tag to the correct `electricity`. I've also remove problematic and inappropriate "image" tags that simply linked to the object on Google Maps, which are not in fact an image file and is an impermissible data source, in addition to the various known issues with the `image` tag.
NeisBot (2026-02-24 18:36:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/9930566370 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "photography studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-05 05:33:02+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179003268
NeisBot (2026-02-24 18:48:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13596095339 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-05 05:33:05+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179378925
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-02-24 18:57:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13461280037 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Insurance agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-05 05:33:05+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179378926
(No visible changes after review)
gpstracks (2026-02-25 17:15:46+00:00): Buongiorno.
Chiedo gentilmente il perchè sono state cambiate le classificazioni alle strade.
Saluti
Jarek 🚲 (2026-02-24 19:35:00+00:00): Oops, incomplete. Continued in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179004555 and I also added commented with reasoning there
micheleOSM3 (2026-02-25 16:33:05+00:00): Ciao, le tue modifiche hanno rotto delle "relation", adesso le sto mettendo a posto.
NeisBot (2026-02-24 19:21:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13262025589 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Towing service"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-05 05:33:06+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179378927
(No visible changes after review)
Jarek 🚲 (2026-02-24 19:19:25+00:00): I recall I discussed this topic with Nate on Slack when he did the change here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138518599) and on Queen. Sorry I don't have a link handy as I'm no longer on Slack.

As I recall, the best we agreed to was that there was no clear consensus on how to tag it. It appears there still isn't (see e.g. the forum discussion linked in the `source` tag here).

But tagging lanes=4 in these cases is at least consistent within Toronto (this stretch of Dundas was the only such road in Toronto tagged lanes=2 currently).
Nate Wessel (2026-03-01 19:02:31+00:00): Makes sense. We do need some better way to indicate the consistent use of a lane for parking though... I think I remember that there is some means of tagging this properly but I haven't had the time to really look into it.
eggie (2026-02-24 19:40:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Diego Krein (2026-02-24 19:53:46+00:00): Gracias por colaborar con OpenStreetMap. El render tarda un rato para actualizarse, y ese tiempo varía en los niveles de zoom. La ddición/actualizacón del mapa está realizada.

Les invitamos/recomiendo entrar a este grupo de Telegram donde podrán charlar con otros colaboradores y sacarse todas las dudas: https://t.me/osm_ar.
Hufkratzer (2026-03-01 19:48:56+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1482650093 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1482650096 are too small for racecourses. These areas look like riding arenas and in then should be tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian instead, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175887026 , see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
vellare (2026-03-01 21:55:49+00:00): Hi. I marked the place where people practice horse riding. Riding a horse in a circle. It's called a hippodrome or something. I've been there too. Now it seems to be abandoned. The owners left because of the war
Hufkratzer (2026-03-01 23:02:12+00:00): You have tagged the ways as horse racing tracks ( leisure=track +  sport=horse_racing ); but a horse cannot race on such small circles or areas, therefore I think sport=horse_racing is wrong here and it should rather be sport=equestrian . And If not only the mapped way can be used for riding, but also the inner area, then leisure=pitch is more appropriate than leisure=track. (Just my opinion)

Ukrainian example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=50.705273&lon=34.696552#map=19/50.705282/34.696781&layers=P

If something is no longer used, you can use the prefix "disused", see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:* (But then it will no longer be rendered on the maps.)
NeisBot (2026-02-24 19:39:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13362023484 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Coffee shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-05 05:33:06+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179378928
(No visible changes after review)
eggie (2026-02-24 20:01:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community