piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
scrambling_panda (2026-04-16 18:14:21+00:00): Hey, thanks for contributing to the map! I’ve enjoyed watching you fill in public bookcases in our area.

I do have a nit to pick, though: I don’t think the usages of the name=* field here were quite right. Here are some relevant snippets from the wiki: 
“ Do not use name=* if:
- The feature is unnamed in the real world. If it is of a type that is typically named, such as a street, use noname=yes to affirm that the omission of name=* is deliberate, rather than a problem to be fixed by another mapper.
- …
- The value you are considering adding is not actually a name, but rather an [address](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses "Addresses") (such as a house number) or a [reference number or code](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref "Key:ref") (such as the hole number on a golf course).
”

Also see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Name_is_the_name_only

So in this case, I think that node 12766997553, for example, shouldn’t have any name value, and instead it should have:
brand=Little Free Library
ref_code=127608

Probably also brand:wikidata. MapComplete will do that for you if you skip past the questions about capacity. Here’s a good example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12997845482 (which I just noticed, you added a duplicate of in Changeset #179640540 …)

I think a clear example where there *should* be a name is Jack’s Books: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12766971725 . As I recall, it’s clearly labeled as such.

So if you don’t object or beat me to it, I’ll soon be cleaning up the tagging of our local bookcases.

Happy mapping!
eggie (2026-04-15 13:26:19+00:00): Niks mis mee...
Mapse
Metzor (2026-04-20 06:22:17+00:00): Hallo Stephan!

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap, falls dich noch niemand begrüßt hat!

Ich hatte die Praxis schon eingetragen, aber "damals" noch im Status "im Bau".

Wie das in iD dargestellt wird, weiß ich nicht, aber jedenfalls habe ich unsere Knoten vereint:
https://api.openstreetmap.org/node/13297340725/history#map=19/48.540425/9.289632

Nun hängen sich die Kontakt-Infos und Öffnungszeiten mit dran. Bei Fragen einfach melden!

Beste Grüße
Metzor
kalupner (2026-04-15 18:41:50+00:00): Hallo,
dieser Changeset
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=181366292
ist ein Desaster! Änderungen in der Stadt Lauta mit addr:suburb Lauta ?????
Änderungen in der Parkstraße 51-63 ??? Vorher war alles gerade und jetzt? Und das mit JOSM! So was kann nicht akzeptiert werden. Übrigens, sollte man den Kartenversatz von Bing vorher ausrichten, dann ist manche Korrektur überflüssig!
Karl
Ropino (2026-04-15 20:20:50+00:00): ok, kein Poblem: Der CS ist revertet. 
Btw: Jetzt fehlt in der Parkstraße wieder die "59", aber dafür ist "alles gerade". 
VG
kalupner (2026-04-16 06:54:58+00:00): Danke, fehlendes Reihenhaus eingepflegt
VG Karl
RaphaelPasloin (2026-04-17 07:17:10+00:00): Reverted : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181443124

The poi is here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1265503651 , if you have checked before the address point , you can see that it's linked to the poi. If you have checked Mappilary imagery, you will probably notice that the place you added the poi is under a roofed building part , there is nothing here it's outside, and underground is a part of the railway station that is not accessible.

Have a good day
Raphael
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-04-17 07:40:52+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for pointing that out; it is indeed on the other side of the station. We will correct this 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.83551349999996&lng=4.3335958999999775&z=17.990620132206917&mapStyle=Esri+satellite&pKey=415774689879009&x=0.8468366994616991&y=0.5518419329284505&zoom=0&focus=photo

Best regards
Vinber-Pro (2026-04-16 14:13:45+00:00): Bonjour Ju_Henry,
merci pour ces contributions !

tu as renseigné 3-4 pour les assises pour les bancs. Il est plutôt d'usage de renseigner un nombre entier positif et si je regarde le wiki (merci cela me fait découvrir cela) il est plutôt question de "confortablement assis", est-ce que l'on passe à 3 ?

bonne carto et encore merci pour ces contributions, c'était chouette hier
Ju_Henry (2026-04-17 13:27:14+00:00): Bonjour Vinber-Pro, merci pour ton retour ! Effectivement, on avait préféré mettre une fourchette... On va plutôt passer à 3 places
Et encore merci pour ta mobilisation lors de la cartopartie :)
1998alexkane (2026-04-18 10:14:19+00:00): At least according to this image: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=640343615013233&focus=photo
the entrances to North Oaks are labeled "No trespassing". Seems like access=private would be correct.
CurlingMan13 (2026-04-21 02:21:16+00:00): Ah, yes, you would be correct.  I'm going to self-revert.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate#:~:text=For%20example%2C%20in%20at%20least%20some%20parts%20of%20the%20United%20States%2C%20a%20%E2%80%9CNo%20Trespassing%E2%80%9D%20sign%20would%20also%20be%20required%20to%20prohibit%20entry%2C%20while%20%E2%80%9CPrivate%20Road%E2%80%9D%20would%20not%20prohibit%20entry.
NeisBot (2026-04-15 13:15:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 48 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/37338108 v25 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/832488820 v3 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/832486338 v1 | 9 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7772270580 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181366689
iandees (2026-04-15 13:22:16+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7772270580, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7772279776 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181367253, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
pyruvate (2026-04-15 13:52:03+00:00): Thank you both! My first "major" edit, I understand and see the issue now and will be more careful in the future.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-15 14:48:57+00:00): @pyruvate 👍
B252697 (2026-04-15 13:15:24+00:00): When I was walking past there earlier this evening, I was surprised, like why does it show on OpenStreetMap without grass even though I can see the grass in that area in reality. So have tried to make this update.
NeisBot (2026-04-15 13:15:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13732236733 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Psychological clinic"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Klinika psychologiczna"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
Kamil Tutaj (2026-04-15 13:47:04+00:00): Descripton deleted
NeisBot (2026-04-15 13:18:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13731007770 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Construction company office"

#MapWithoutSpam
mikita_paloika (2026-04-16 12:52:54+00:00): Hello harukiOu! Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I noticed your recent edits. It looks like some roads were connected to a single central node or aligned in a way that doesn't match the aerial imagery or the actual road layout. Could you please clarify if you used a specific source or survey for these changes? In OSM, we try to follow the actual geometry of the roads.

Thank you! 
Mikita,
#mapbox_editing
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181366882
iandees (2026-04-15 13:22:17+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8562195944 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181367258, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
MappingMore (2026-04-16 11:40:20+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181409212
Ltrlg (2026-04-19 06:43:49+00:00): En quoi operator=* est-il invalide ici ? C’est défini comme « l’organisation directement en charge de l'exploitation », il me semble que l’association gestionnaire répond bien à cette définition.
mw014 (2026-04-20 13:20:12+00:00): mhh ma modification est probablement abusive ici.
A ce moment là je pensais que la clé operator avait été utilisée comme champ descriptif (en parlant de société au lieu d'association, en utilisant une phrase descriptive...)
De ma lecture du wiki et des exemples, la valeur de la clé operator est uniquement [le nom] de l'asso qui gère l'établissement... une lecture trop stricte peut-être ?
Ltrlg (2026-04-20 16:00:08+00:00): Ma lecture est également que operator=* devrait contenir le nom de l’association. Je n’avais pas fait attention que ces operator=* avaient été ajoutés par toi dans une tentative de nettoyage précédente, et pensais par conséquent qu’il s’agissait des noms des associations précédemment correctement renseignés. Idéalement il faudrait trouver les bons noms, mais en l’absence d’informations supplémentaires ta modification me semble justifiée.
NieWnen (2026-05-16 19:48:03+00:00): Ta zmiana zepsuła relację autobusową. Poprawiłem.

Jeśli dodawane są ograniczenia maks. prędkości, to warto je uwzględniać w obie strony maxspeed:forward=* maxspeed:backward=* bo te bywają bardzo często rozbieżne i patrząc na to co zostało wprowadzone ze znaków wartości w jezdni są nieprawidłowe.
Dvorný (2026-04-15 16:27:14+00:00): Tyto zahrady nebyly importovány, ale geometrie dost neseděla. Také byly přidány parkoviště.
NeisBot (2026-04-15 13:27:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13732274732 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Barber shop"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : « salon de coiffure »
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
MappingMore (2026-04-16 16:50:46+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181423214
silversurfer83 (2026-04-15 16:42:14+00:00): Moin Tim,
willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Danke, dass du hilfst die Datenbank aktuell zu halten.

Zu deinen ersten Änderungen:

- Hier hast du eine Loipe bearbeitet. Der Waldweg ist weiter so vorhanden nehme ich an, nur die Loipe wird kommenden Winter nicht mehr gespurt, korrekt?

Bei den anderen Änderungen: Dinge, die vor Ort nicht mehr sichtbar können weg. Bei den Einkehrmöglichkeiten ist noch die Frage: Was ist davon noch zu sehen? Wenn sie nur geschlossen sind, dann sollten sie nicht gelöscht werden.

Grüße aus Korbach

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181367786
H_Tim_H (2026-04-15 17:38:22+00:00): Moin,

der Waldweg ist weiter vorhanden. Die Loipe wird nicht mehr gespurt. 

Die Gebäude der Einkehrmöglichkeiten stehen natürlich noch. Sind aber dauerhaft geschlossen.

LG
Tim
Vaidotas (2026-04-16 15:19:57+00:00): What is the point of duplicating local name to separate language name tag?
burakonder (2026-04-20 11:10:35+00:00): Hello,

In Istanbul, Esri Satellite Imagery mostly has more up-to-date data. When editing in Istanbul, using Esri instead of Bing will contribute to more consistent data.

This road is present in the Bing image, but the area appears divided in the Esri image.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1499608555
aquarix (2026-04-18 20:06:33+00:00): Hallo BeniK93,
gibt es den Laden nicht mehr bzw. wurde der Laden zu Wohnraum umgebaut oder steht der Laden nur leer? Falls letzteres der Fall ist, sollte der Laden nicht gelöscht werden sondern per Lebenszyklus-Tags als vakant gekennzeichnet werden. Es könnte schließlich ein neuer Betreiber einen neuen Laden eröffnen.
Schöne Grüße aquarix
BeniK93 (2026-04-18 20:19:04+00:00): Hallo aquarix,
der Laden wurde aufgelöst und seine Räumlichkeiten sind durch Umbau in Florians Backstube integriert worden.
Das mit dem "vakant" markieren ist ein guter Hinweis, das kannte ich so nicht. Durch den Umbau müsste die Löschung aber passen, oder?
Viele Grüße 
BeniK93
aquarix (2026-04-19 12:20:09+00:00): Hallo,
ja mit der Integration in einen anderen Laden ist die Löschung in Ordnung.
Gruß aquarix
eggie (2026-04-15 14:28:10+00:00): Dag Carla,

Voor het hek wel, maar voor de wegdelen zal het dan ook moeten worden aangepast.
Gr eggie
NeisBot (2026-04-15 14:00:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 21 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1499612400 v1 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1499612395 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1499612401 v1 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1733113112 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181368886
Wildsharky (2026-04-17 11:58:22+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181404960
HantDX (2026-04-15 14:12:23+00:00): Тут нет грамматической ошибки.
NeisBot (2026-04-15 14:21:22+00:00): Hi TOMPE ANDRE, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 name(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181369359
woodpeck (2026-04-15 14:25:18+00:00): Mapper deleted their own data
MappingMore (2026-04-16 17:53:02+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181425879
GinaroZ (2026-04-15 17:39:12+00:00): Why have you changed these and other from dismount to yes, do they meet the criteria at: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier=cycle%20barrier?uselang=en-GB#Standard_bicycle_access ?
Pawcio (2026-04-15 18:29:18+00:00): Yes, I cycled through them. Why else would I change them?
BC168 (2026-04-16 00:05:32+00:00): Moin,
"cuisine=keine" ist kein gültiger Wert. Wenn das bedeuten soll, dass es hier nichts zu essen gibt, dann ist amenity=restaurant wohl falsch, und amenity=pub oder amenity=bar wäre passender (bitte im Wiki nachsehen, was von beiden besser zutrifft).

Telefonnummern bitte im internationalen Standardformat (+49 234 5840812) angeben. Danke :)
CAM-Gerlach (2026-04-16 02:48:53+00:00): Hi Mitch, just a reminder--per what Frank Peng and I both mentioned to you on several of your previous changesets, please make sure you set the correct offset your aerial imagery before mapping with it, that will avoid everything you map being offset and requiring correction later, which for spending a few seconds now avoids requiring way more time and effort to fix it later.

VBMP is much closer than Bing to orthorectified in this area, but is consistently offset by over a meter to the north and west; by my reckoning via Bing and GPS tracks an offset of roughly -0.95; 1.10 will correct that (slightly more or less depending on the exact location, but this offset is roughly correct for this location to perhaps 10-20 cm precision). 

Unfortunately I can see from your changeset here that you mapped directly from raw VBMP only with no offset applied. Again, before you continue mapping, *please take care to apply the proper offset to your VBMP imagery* to avoid everything you map being misaligned with the real world and the work of other local mappers.

Thanks, and happy mapping!
iismitch55 (2026-04-16 16:49:30+00:00): Hi Cam, from the feedback provided, I have incorporated VBMP imagery into my mapping, using as the primary background for this area. I still flip between VBMP and other map layers as there's more information to be gained by using a variety of maps due to different exposure, foliage, and timeline. That is why you continue to see Bing imagery as a source in this changeset.

I was unaware that you can apply offset to maps to assist alignment. I'm more than happy to do this for future edits. For this and other recent edits, VBMP is the primary source used.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-04-17 02:57:40+00:00): > I still flip between VBMP and other map layers as there's more information to be gained by using a variety of maps due to different exposure, foliage, and timeline. That is why you continue to see Bing imagery as a source in this changeset.

Yup, that's great and totally what you should be doing. The feedback I was referring to above was our reminders to make sure you set the correct offset for VBMP imagery before using it (Bing has close to zero offset, within the margin of error of GPS tracks, at least at high zoom levels), as was the issue here (given the building outlines are not aligned with correctly offset VBMP (or Bing), and instead perfectly match raw, un-offset VBMP.

> I was unaware that you can apply offset to maps to assist alignment. I'm more than happy to do this for future edits. 

Yup, I'm a JOSM user but it also works with iD/Rapid, under the Imagery Offset dropdown at the bottom of the Background panel on the right (where you select the imagery)--you can just paste the values I've suggested above there. However, unlike JOSM I'm not sure iD/Rapid actually save your offset setting between settings (like so many other display settings, very annoyingly, one of the many reasons you might consider moving to JOSM at some point in your mapping journey).
iandees (2026-04-15 14:47:22+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9467688748 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181371267, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Wildsharky (2026-04-17 12:02:23+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181439045
HantDX (2026-04-16 07:51:09+00:00): Это не ошибка. По правилам сообщества в name пишется название на бел. языке, а там доска - это дошка. См. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Belarus:Map_languages
kossmale (2026-04-16 16:51:45+00:00): Буду знать, спасибо за разъяснение
NeisBot (2026-04-15 14:27:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/10311294172 v7

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Construction company office"

#MapWithoutSpam
ivanbranco (2026-04-15 15:11:39+00:00): Hi Hypsometric,

in two cases you overwrote the previous leisure values (water_park and beach_resort):
1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1433264893/history
2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1121952607/history

was it intended?
Hypsometric (2026-04-15 17:19:08+00:00): Thanks for checking.

Satellite view shows nothing that would make the water park (node/1433264893) a water park.  Based on the name, the value was changed.

For beach resort, maybe I am misunderstanding the description in the wiki: "Use leisure=beach_resort to mark the boundary of a managed beach or part of a beach..." Until I read that I was thinking it would be a beach resort.

Thanks for your help.
ivanbranco (2026-04-15 17:30:09+00:00): Just for the record, this changeset has since been reverted.
Hypsometric (2026-04-15 18:02:48+00:00): Thanks for the heads up. Maybe I can get some feedback on changeset 181375670.
Mannivu (2026-04-15 17:00:57+00:00): Ciao, questa via https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1499620974 non ha molto senso di esserci in OSM dato che non c'è una divisione fisica e, solitamente, vanno separate le strade solo in presenza di divisioni fisiche, non ottiche come le strisce zebrate
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181370508
yelisey90 (2026-04-16 06:41:31+00:00): reverted - the road in one-way for general traffic, only buses & taxis can go straight. Or has that changed recently?
LakeInari (2026-04-17 09:58:40+00:00): Hi yelisey90,
Thank you for reaching out and informing me about this, I will defer to your edits.
joost schouppe (2026-04-16 07:43:59+00:00): Hey KayJay,
You added a firestation here. It is clearly not a firestation from the emergency zone for Geraardsbergen. Is there perhaps a fire truck here belonging to the airfield? To indicate those places, see the tagging here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Firestations#Mapping_guide
joost schouppe (2026-04-22 15:26:54+00:00): I'll remove it for now; I'll add it again after I get feedback
felipeeugenio (2026-04-15 15:15:29+00:00): Hola Cristóbal.
La información que agregas es muy valiosa, pero lamentablemente tenemos problemas con la calidad. Parecen dibujos esquemáticos. Uno hace zoon al área que dibujas y las cosas no tienen precisamente esas formas. No se trata de hacer un trabajo topográfico de exactitud al centímetro, pero si se pueden agregar nodos que denoten las curvas y las formas de los bosques como realmente son.

Hay herramientas, además, que te harían el trabajo muy facul (usando el software JOSM).

Te pedimos por favor, unirte al chat de la comunidad en Telegram, donde puedes recibir toda la instrucción que necesites y requieras. Estamos para ayudarte.

El link al chat esta en mi bio.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181370857