piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Baloo Uriza (2025-04-15 18:44:08+00:00): unclassified to residential is a weird change but the others look good.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164991374
MxxCon (2025-04-17 20:38:59+00:00): Should that be alt_name= or name:th=? Also, why only this one block and the rest of the street?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164991824
wille (2025-04-17 20:47:31+00:00): See the details of the naming in https://www.westsiderag.com/2025/04/08/uws-street-naming-ceremony-and-meditation-to-honor-buddhist-monk-on-april-11
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164991824
MxxCon (2025-04-17 20:50:20+00:00): Ah, I didn't realize that was an honorary street name.👍
silversurfer83 (2025-04-15 19:30:06+00:00): Hi there :)

Here's some important information regarding your sidewalks:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk

watch the "sidewalk=..." tags along the streets.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164992993
Donut Master 🍩 (2025-04-17 15:59:22+00:00): Thanks, silversufer83!
L29Ah (2025-04-15 23:31:40+00:00): I guess you'd better use access=* tags for policy and barrier=* tags for mapping actual obstacles on the way, as the road looks contiguous on the aerial images.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164993516
Libredactor (2025-04-16 14:27:51+00:00): This section has a connection via 2 climbs and a section in the middle. From the Belvederska Ulica side, there is an ascent, then a small platform and then another ascent to the Selim bega motorway exit. This section is not through and is separated on both sides by a gate. If it would be more correct to make it as one road but with limited access, you can edit it.
MxxCon (2025-04-17 20:40:10+00:00): Walter's Cottage changed its name?😱We used to go there quiet a lot.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164993719
hellflower (2025-04-18 01:13:41+00:00): One of my favorites too! But heartbreakingly closed. This is a reno'ed new bar, new owner, seems okay so far.
Taya_S (2025-04-15 17:55:44+00:00): Reverted sockpuppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164997320
Pokomams (2025-04-29 09:24:17+00:00): Le chemin n'est pas relié à la route, le passage est bloqué?
Bressuire (2025-04-29 13:28:10+00:00): modification faite le 29-04-2025 Merci pour l'info
divaddivag (2025-05-02 19:11:10+00:00): Bonsoir,

Quelles sont vos sources pour passer la Rue Leforestier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38561644) en zone de rencontre? En France, cela a des implications légales. Vos commentaires de changeset n'aident pas: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications 

--------
Hi 
What are your sources to qualify this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38561644 as a living_street. In France it has legal implications. Your changeset comments do not help: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Nzau (2025-05-04 09:03:29+00:00): Merci pour ta vigilance David, 
Je viens de faire les modifs : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165789107

Les images sur Panoramax montrent bien qu'il ne s'agit pas d'une zone de rencontre mais simplement d'une rue a sens unique.
divaddivag (2025-05-05 04:06:32+00:00): J'ai vu cela en allant rendre visite à un proche à l’hôpital. C'est du mapping pour le rendu partout où mlmt passe sans considération du sens des tags, de la diversité des ré-utilisation et sans outils pour assurer les mises à jour que cela soit par lui-même ou d'autres. Compte tenu de l'importance administrative de Bayeux et habitant juste à coté, j'avais caressé l'idée d'adopter la ville mais repasser derrière lui c'est juste 'sisyphéen'.
Taya_S (2025-04-15 17:55:45+00:00): Reverted sockpuppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164997320
b-jazz (2025-04-15 17:04:38+00:00): Yup, I done f'd up. Apologies.
santamariense (2026-03-22 22:12:36+00:00): Olá marcosalexandre00912,

Notei essa importação que tu fizeste. Importações têm que ser discutidas e comunicadas à comunidade. Talvez isso tivesse evitado o problema de duplicações de geometrias.

Atualizar com uma importação significa mesclar com os dados existentes, substituindo por geometrias melhores. O que você fez foi meramente duplicar geometrias.

Me surpreende que tuas primeiras edições foram diretamente importação. É preciso ter uma curva de aprendizado para poder lidar com importações.

Esses conjuntos de modificações precisam ser revertidos, infelizmente. 

santamariense
Norbert Dichter (2025-04-15 17:21:02+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164995701
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-26 09:18:41+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173784770
MxxCon (2025-04-17 20:43:07+00:00): Hello.
Please note that "service_times=Open every day for prayer" is not a valid tag. It should follow the same syntax as opening_hours tag.
You can use sites like https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ to help you generate a correct tag value.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164996449
SeveralShorts (2025-04-18 19:01:30+00:00): fixed! thanks for the resource
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164996449
Norbert Dichter (2025-04-15 17:44:25+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164996563
fortera_au (2025-04-16 03:13:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165008686 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert - fictional game editing
bxl-forever (2025-04-15 18:05:37+00:00): Nice… but if there is already a vacant shop, it is advised to re-use the existing node instead of creating a new node next to it.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

We fixed your edit.
Bandino (2025-04-15 20:56:05+00:00): Thank you for fixing mistake. 
I used organic map, on which we can’t see vacant shop. 
I’ll better use « go maps » now.
eggie (2025-04-16 05:26:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Erieke (2025-04-16 07:34:10+00:00): Ik zag het, dank! :)
Groeten Erieke
MxxCon (2025-04-17 20:45:42+00:00): Hello.
Like your previous edit, here service_times tag has invalid values.
If you go to https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/ and paste this tag value, you'll see that it's incorrect.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164997533
SeveralShorts (2025-04-18 13:32:00+00:00): Thanks, this is a useful tool. Just updated accordingly.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164997533
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-26 08:58:22+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173784149
MxxCon (2025-04-17 20:47:45+00:00): Looking up 4458806 in NYC's building database shows that it is a separate building from 4028073 next to it. You shouldn't have combined them into one.
You can use website created by another nyc mapper to look up various buildings metadata https://jmapb.github.io/nycaabs/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164997802
SeveralShorts (2025-04-18 18:55:21+00:00): Just fixed this - thanks for the resource!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164997802
Lezurex (2025-04-16 12:53:07+00:00): Müssen die beiden Wege nicht verbunden werden?
stillhart (2025-04-16 18:50:50+00:00): 😭👍
stillhart (2025-04-20 11:36:50+00:00): Ich habe das Gefühl das iD bei mir nicht mehr so richtig "stickt" bzw wenn ich den Node daneben droppe den nicht mehr konsistent anhängt.
RedAuburn (2025-04-15 18:14:11+00:00): o and disconnect park from road
Sammamish (2025-06-16 12:53:45+00:00): Hello Abdul-Nayar Rabiatu Sungumu
I have fixed validation error Self crossing ways for building way 1353789012.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
dafelix (2025-04-16 05:50:50+00:00): Hi, danke fürs korrigieren. Ich hatte die Lage damals aus Fotos von der Straße aus geschätzt. Hast du eine bessere Quelle?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164998271
opendcc (2025-04-16 07:21:59+00:00): Ich bin da gestern auch vorbeigeradelt und habe da Richtung Waldrand gepeilt und einen save-position vom Navi gemacht. Vermutlich nicht ganz korrekt aber hoffentlich näher dran an echter outline ...
jmapb (2025-07-22 14:49:16+00:00): Reverted in changeset 169297918, see see comments in changeset 164958290
Branko Kokanovic (2025-04-16 18:12:06+00:00): samo sam popravio tagove, da budu isti kao u Oplenackoj nize. Super, hvala!
infeeeee (2025-04-17 08:53:16+00:00): Szia!

Az olyan vasutakat, amiknek már nyomuk sincs nem térképezzük! Szerintem ez az, már ház épült keresztbe, ezt szerintem nem kellene ezen a térképen megjeleníteni, vannak erre jobb projektek, pl: https://www.openhistoricalmap.org

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség#Elérhetőségek

További jó térképezést!
NieWnen (2026-05-10 14:10:26+00:00): Cześć, 
nie mapujemy pasów rowerowych jako oddzielne linie. W uliczce już było to odpowiednio otagowane jako cycleway:left=lane + cycleway:left:oneway=no
PierZen (2025-04-16 19:16:27+00:00): contacter responsables projet #hotosm-project-17604;#CanCross;#CRC;#MissingMaps;#OPSGIS2025 pour réparer bâtiments non rectangulaires
eggie (2025-04-15 20:06:21+00:00): Dag CPK,

Splitsen en verleggen van de OV routes is gelukt. Het ziet er wel netjes uit. 
Kan alleen maar bedenken dat dit nooit gesplitst is omdat verfstrepen op de weg niet als gescheiden rijbanen wordt ingetekend, maar dat wordt dan lastig hier omdat je op bepaalde punten wel verhogingen (eilandjes) hebt. 
Inframappers tegen bv aan de noordzijde de wegen gewoon op één way met lanes=2 en gaan dan niet door in een gesplitste weg tot de kruising. 
De bewoner van nr 37 kan in principe gewoon direct naar het zuiden rijden. Hulpdiensten kunnen gewoon over verfstrepen rijden.
Maar het ziet er wel actueel en  netjes uit. Zou het zo maar laten. 

MVG
eggie
CPK-PrB (2025-04-15 20:11:32+00:00): Heb zelf een probleem met fietsroute 50-51 ontdekt die ik niet weg krijg.
Maak hem nu even zoals ik hem eerst had, maar hij geeft een fout melding in https://knooppuntnet.nl!
Mvg, CPK-PrB.
eggie (2025-04-15 20:16:10+00:00): Zal zo even kijken...
Wel nog een fietsverbinding gemaakt met de Tuintjes tegenover De Griffioen.
eggie (2025-04-15 20:21:25+00:00): Die 50 51 route moet ook gesplitst worden. Dat zijn lastige dingen als je geen ervaring hebt met relaties.
Busroutes kennen geen roles  tags. Fietsroutes wel. Dus een fietsroute moet de juiste richting krijgen. 
forward en hier zelfs een stuke backward tegen de tekenrichting in.
Die fietsroute moet dus gesplitst worden.
Wil je dat zelf proberen?  Kan het ook wel voor je doen.
CPK-PrB (2025-04-15 20:23:53+00:00): Ik heb dat al geprobeerd, maar kwam er niet uit.
Als jij dat doet, kan ik het straks na kijken.
Alvast vriendelijk dank!
Mvg, CPK-PrB.
eggie (2025-04-15 20:26:45+00:00): Die route hoort ook over de westelijke baan te lopen van af de vroente en dan linksaf de schoolstraat in.
Eerst een stuk role forward en dan de oversteek role backward. 
In het relatievenster kun je dan zien hoe de delen aan elkaar passen in de juiste volgorde.
eggie (2025-04-15 20:32:51+00:00): Moment...  Ik pas het even aan.
CPK-PrB (2025-04-15 20:34:42+00:00): Heb ik geprobeerd, maar geen enkele combinatie wilde kloppen.
eggie (2025-04-15 20:41:11+00:00): Moet even rustig kijken want er zitten nog meer fouten in... even puzzelen
CPK-PrB (2025-04-15 20:44:18+00:00): Misschien kwam ik er daardoor niet uit!
eggie (2025-04-15 20:46:01+00:00): Het klopt weer... Wanneer je het relatie venster opent kun je zien hoe de roles lopen. 

Dit zijn echt gecompliceerde dingen. De meeste mappers wagen zich er niet aan.
eggie (2025-04-15 20:48:34+00:00): Die roles hebben niet met de heen- of terugweg te maken maar of een route met de tekenrichting of tegen de tekenrichting inloopt.
eggie (2025-04-15 20:51:00+00:00): https://knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/changeset/165002791/6558513
CPK-PrB (2025-04-15 20:51:07+00:00): Maar zat de fout wel in het deel dat ik veranderde? Of was er ook een andere onderbreking?
eggie (2025-04-15 20:58:36+00:00): Wat je wellicht niet had gedaan is de hele relatie binnenhalen. Dat doe je met dat groene pijltje in de linker kantlijn van het relatievenster.
Meestal krijg je wel een waarschuwing in josm dat je alle delen moet binnenhalen.
eggie (2025-04-15 21:00:49+00:00): Nee hier zat de fout .. de route ging tegen de oneway=yes in. 
Maar zodra je gaat rommelen (dat deed ik net) zie je meer fouten ontstaan. Dan sla ik niet op, maar begin weer opnieuw. Het juist sorteren is het lastigst bij dit soort kruisingen.
eggie (2025-04-15 21:02:55+00:00): Jouw wijziging https://knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/changeset/165001448/6558468

Remaining factsRouteNotBackwardRouteNotContiniousRouteBroken
CPK-PrB (2025-04-15 21:05:52+00:00): Oké. Bedankt voor de hulp.
Volgende keer dus toch verder door puzzelen.
Als ik mezelf er ooit nog aan waag.
De buslijnen waren wel te doen. Dat is duidelijker.
Dat scherm met de melding had ik wel gevonden, maar hij wilde geen groen poppetje geven.
Vriendelijk dank!
Groet, CPK-PrB.
eggie (2025-04-15 21:14:26+00:00): Het is een kwestie van veel doen, maar het is behoorlijk ingewikkeld in het begin vooral als er meer routes door elkaar lopen.
habi (2025-04-15 19:56:33+00:00): Hey!
Idealerweise hättest du aber nicht nur den Namen, sondern auch alle anderen Infos vom Wullehuus, die noch auf dem POI sind auch angepasst ;)
Gruss,
Habi
Outdoorrookie (2025-04-16 21:24:47+00:00): Hallo 
Also Fashion Outlet gehört gemäss dem Unternehmensverzeichnis der Gemeinde Münsingen zum Wullehuus... 
Oder habe ich was falsch verstanden?
Gruss
habi (2025-04-20 06:34:57+00:00): Dann habe ich etwas falsch verstanden, auf https://www.wullehus.ch/ taucht drum nur Konolfingen auf.
Joseph R P (2025-04-17 02:24:52+00:00): Hello—please do not add city labels for metro areas. The Las Vegas Valley is only a region, not a proper city, and the current Las Vegas city node already represents the core city that the metro area is sprawling off of.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-04-21 04:33:49+00:00): Okay. (Sorry I didn't respond to this earlier.)
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-16 01:27:52+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17555
eggie (2025-04-18 08:08:52+00:00): reverted by changeset #165099647

Ben je hier bekend of ben je gewoon zelf aan het interpreteren?

MVG
eggie
prino (2025-04-16 20:39:02+00:00): This looks like what I observed in October 2024, but this route is unable to actually access the destination: https://valhalla.openstreetmap.de/directions?profile=car&wps=22.6956457,55.4613953,21.1808828,55.7289176
DodoGTA (2025-04-16 21:27:13+00:00): Currently the routers can't route to any of the new road ways here (so I think you should wait for them to get the updated OSM data)
eggie (2025-04-16 07:04:51+00:00): Dag dosch.. Het zal met kloppen, want het vervolg staat ook op slot voor iedereen.

MVG
eggie
Branko Kokanovic (2025-04-16 18:06:16+00:00): reverted, not correct based on government data
s-tikhomirov (2025-04-16 18:38:05+00:00): It complies with the "truth on the ground" principle though. There are signs with that street name there.
Branko Kokanovic (2025-04-17 12:12:30+00:00): I see. This is probably old street name and old sign. There is no addresses on Rusinska here. Since this is such small part of street, I would still not keep it (usually, it is just a matter of time[1] when this sign is replaced)

[1] Time here is flexible, sometimes years:)
s-tikhomirov (2025-04-18 09:15:48+00:00): Would that make sense then to keep the street name in OSM as it reflects the truth on the ground, and remove it if and when signs are removed? BTW, on older Street View images (https://maps.app.goo.gl/sJUncUnDQjkkiQgP7) there are no "Rusinska" signs - they seem to be installed relatively recently.
Branko Kokanovic (2025-04-18 16:31:06+00:00): OK, this old sign says "Djordja Dere", so I was wrong - Rusinska is not old street name. If it is new street name, it is still not propagated to RGZ - https://a3.geosrbija.rs/. If you actually saw sign, please split street and add name. Or revert my change. If you cannot do it/do not know, let me know and I will clean up after me:)
s-tikhomirov (2025-04-18 17:41:09+00:00): I don't see a way to revert a changeset in ID... I'd appreciate if you revert you changeset then. Thank you!
Branko Kokanovic (2025-04-18 17:46:57+00:00): Reverted. I will need to fix etymology only. BTW, I am using https://revert.osmz.ru/ for reverts - in most cases, it just works!
PierZen (2025-04-16 19:15:32+00:00): contacter responsables projet #hotosm-project-17604;#CanCross;#CRC;#MissingMaps;#OPSGIS2025 pour réparer bâtiments non rectangulaires
balint36 (2025-08-22 09:27:43+00:00): A demolished:railway címke együtt nincs használva. A disused:railway=rail és railway=abandoned egymásnak ellentmondásos.
MxxCon (2025-04-17 21:12:44+00:00): Hello.
Please note, as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:leisure the use of leisure=common is deprecated. Could you elaborate what this feature is? So that more appropriate tag can be used?
Additionally, you added laundry with improperly formatted phone number. Phone numbers must always contain country dialing code, in US it's +1, and they should be separated only by - or space, not ( ).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165001472
SeveralShorts (2025-04-23 21:09:46+00:00): Fixed - thanks for noting this
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165001472
cyton (2025-04-15 20:16:37+00:00): Waren das einzelne building:part? Oder hätte man das damit lösen können pkus zusätzlichem hausumring? Zwecks 3D mapping mit unterschiedlicher höhe
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165001518
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-13 11:32:54+00:00): Why you added amenity=social_facility to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/302706/history ?
Norbert Dichter (2025-04-15 20:23:13+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165001807
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-04-16 11:44:00+00:00): Moin ChillyDL,
warum die Änderung von website zu url?
Gruß Roger Wilco
ChillyDL (2025-04-16 19:23:42+00:00): Hallo Roger Wilco,
weil website= für offizielle Websites eines Features gedacht ist, und url= für "relevante, aber nicht offizielle", siehe 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:website
Die Trichterbecherleute hatten irgendwie versäumt, offizielle Websites für ihre Großsteingräber anzulegen.
Viele Grüße
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-04-16 19:35:30+00:00): Ah, OK. Das wusste ich noch nicht. Dachte der website Tag ist universell verwendbar. Habe bisher url=* nie verwendet.
marc__marc (2026-02-21 21:07:42+00:00): Hello and welcome
I have changed the camp_site (that describe the level of facilities provided) into cabins=yes
feel free to improve the area : add the service road, cabins, maybe a contact (email, website, phone, ...)
you may also add camp_site to describe the level of facilities provided 
here is the doc about it https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:camp_site
feel free to ask if needed
Regards,
Marc
BCNorwich (2025-04-17 06:04:34+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately, your new highway, Way: 1377897003, duplicated existing highways, which could have caused disruption to routing. Thus, I've removed it.

If a way needs correcting please correct any existing way.

I also corrected the playground area to within the highways.

Regards Bernard.
NieWnen (2025-04-15 23:22:48+00:00): Cześć,
dzięki za zmiany.

Jedna prośba. Postaraj się proszę nie usuwać obiektów jeśli nie ma takiej potrzeby, a w miarę możliwości je przesuwać/zmieniać geometrię, dzięki czemu zostanie zachowana ich historia zmian.
Artali (2025-04-16 17:37:11+00:00): Ok, dzięki, będę pamiętał
eggie (2025-04-18 08:10:47+00:00): Het is al weer hersteld zie ik.
Je veroorzaakt door lopen schade aan de routering.
MVG
eggie