piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JessAk71 (2026-03-20 16:44:30+00:00): Hello, this changeset seems to have added business tags to this building which is incorrect since this building houses many businesses (more than 6) so the best thing to do is to make a node for the new business where its located instead of adding the tags to this building. I have already made this change for you and put it on the existing node that the business now occupies. Please try to be more careful in future edits.
arafqus (2026-01-27 22:14:31+00:00): + Road alignment
Nekoatthegates (2026-01-28 23:55:30+00:00): Correction: Source used was Mapbox Satellite; Esri World Imagery (-3.00; 7.00); Strava.
nevw (2026-01-28 01:37:55+00:00): Hi, please don’t delete private ways in osm.
We have tag to denote them as private - access=private
You own your property but you don’t get to control what is mapped on the osm
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:55:37+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/238812824 v4 | 13 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/2466115489 v6

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177782877
NeisReview (2026-02-05 06:18:49+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177846714
eggie (2026-01-28 08:41:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-01-28 07:31:36+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13502640532 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Aflac office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-06 06:06:26+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178169390
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-28 07:31:37+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13502713774 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "children's clothing store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-06 06:06:26+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178169391
(No visible changes after review)
akalaku (2026-01-27 23:10:34+00:00): https://peakvisor.com/panorama.html?lat=-46.527617792955&lng=-72.42916834969013&alt=1239
akalaku (2026-01-27 23:09:23+00:00): See also https://peakvisor.com/panorama.html?lat=-46.527617792955&lng=-72.42916834969013&alt=1239
Taya_S (2026-01-28 07:50:54+00:00): Restored house and address details

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177792989
Taya_S (2026-01-28 07:54:35+00:00): I'm sorry, but it does not work like that. There is no private information mapped here, just a building and an address. Your consent is not needed and this does not violate our rules regarding mapping private information.

Note that attempting to remove this data again will likely result in an account block.

Best regards,  
Taya Snijder,
On Behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
fmc_6 (2026-01-28 10:30:25+00:00): Grüß dich und danke dir! Die einzige Optimierung könnte sein, das Enddatum der Sperre einzutragen. Ist das vor Ort bekannt? Auf der Website steht leider nur "2026", aber nicht ob Anfang oder Ende des Jahres :)
gjantz (2026-01-27 23:35:49+00:00): Just to clarify: although there is already the “PIN AG – Depot Wilmersdorf” tagged with the amenity post_office, the Wilmersdorf depot is technically also a post_depot. We sort letters and parcels there and then deliver them. However, it could still be considered a post_office, since they also provide certain customer‑facing services, such as allowing people to pick up letters or parcels (for example when a mailbox is broken).
ClaveScottPH (2026-05-14 08:49:59+00:00): Thanks.
James_OWORNTE (2026-03-26 21:26:36+00:00): Thank you for your contribution!
The task was well mapped, and I modified and simplified some nodes.
Once again, thank you for your participation!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-27 11:10:21+00:00): Cleaned up mistagging for Lucid Private Offices POI in changeset 184687963

https://osm.org/changeset/184687963
gjantz (2026-01-28 00:22:19+00:00): post_office=bureau is probably incorrect. Since post_depot already includes services like frontdesks. Sorry for that.
nevw (2026-01-28 01:34:22+00:00): Hi, the coffee shop is already mapped

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1466354404#map=19/-32.728232/151.558721&layers=D
It is best to add or amend already mapped items than duplicate them.
gurglypipe (2026-01-28 23:24:20+00:00): Why change https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423109954 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423109955 from a more specific building type to building=residential?
philipcullen (2026-01-28 23:28:45+00:00): I think that was in error when making other buildings more specific. I'd spotted it when looking through in osmcha, so was going to undo that when I looked at the next nearby area.
gurglypipe (2026-01-28 23:32:57+00:00): I’ve undone it as 

Where did the house numbers for some of the houses on Kirkfield Rise come from? e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423109955
gurglypipe (2026-01-28 23:34:28+00:00): sigh, I pressed enter too early.

I’ve undone it as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177825330
gurglypipe (2026-01-28 23:39:01+00:00): And the house numbers on Greenbank Road (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/931037222), where did they come from? A few of them have come from splitting terraces (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461754049/history) but unless I’m missing something many of them haven’t?
philipcullen (2026-01-28 23:45:51+00:00): Thanks for sorting (though you can always leave those to be fixed later when I return if you want).

The house numbers are inferred from the existing house numbers in a given postcode/street, the gaps in the number of houses left, and the consecutive UPRNs as a double check.
gurglypipe (2026-01-30 21:00:06+00:00): I don’t think it’s safe to guess at house numbers like that, even if you are using multiple sources to cross-check. While you might be right most of the time, house numbering in the UK can be surprising at times and I think it will end up introducing errors.

This kind of thing is much better left to an on-the-ground survey, and apps like StreetComplete make that really easy. Someone will get to surveying it eventually.
philipcullen (2026-01-30 21:20:31+00:00): I think it depends - In most cases I agree with you (the numbers on my own street defy all attempt to put them into any logical sequence - even though there were all built at the same time), so where there is ambiguity adding in missing house numbers is best avoided, but I do think there are some limited cases (such as this one) where the gaps can be infilled with very minimal risk of error.

It is also quite common for people to survey both ends of a street and interpolate between.
gurglypipe (2026-01-30 21:26:27+00:00): A lot of the house number and house name data in Ambleside is contributed by tourists, who are here for a limited time, probably distracted and don’t know the area that well, and hence I wouldn’t really trust it to interpolate from.
Entbert (2026-01-28 00:42:08+00:00): (Linienverlauf übernommen aus Relation der S 9)
NeisBot (2026-01-28 07:31:39+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1133869018 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Diesel repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-06 06:06:27+00:00): ❌ Text fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/177826057
rskedgell (2026-01-28 11:02:28+00:00): It looks like this ans some post box tags were inadvertently added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130414569
SomeoneElse (2026-01-28 22:44:43+00:00): That explains it - I've restored the original post office node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5743772095/history and moved it to a likely location.
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:55:46+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/477278957 v15 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/4706572271 v10

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177785863
NeisReview (2026-02-05 06:18:50+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177839274
Taksine (2026-06-22 09:23:38+00:00): 不是哥们，6062年了哪来的家乐福，我早就全部删光了，你怎么还把它弄复活了
lordzden (2026-01-28 02:44:14+00:00): Please approve location.
jmapb (2026-05-08 02:25:53+00:00): Hi MadCat3D, regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1471849035 -- construction hasn't begun on this building yet. What's your source for the building footprint, and building height accurate to the centimeter?
MadCat3D (2026-05-08 03:01:52+00:00): As excavation for the foundation is underway I put the building as under construction, if this is incorrect policy I apologize.

I got the height data from Ney York YIMBY (https://newyorkyimby.com/2025/12/excavation-continues-for-kpf-designed-skyscraper-at-570-fifth-avenue-in-midtown-manhattan-2.html) placing current planed height at 567ft, which I then converted to meters rounding to try and keep it as accurate between feet and meters. This height is also reported by ABS partners in their article discussing a law firm seeking to be the anchor tenant for the building (https://absre.com/law-firm-nears-deal-to-anchor-570-fifth-ave-development/).

Admittedly the footprint is based on renderings from KPF’s site (https://www.kpf.com/project/570-fifth-avenue-2) as well as older renderings of the buildings massing which can be found here (https://newyorkyimby.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/172224159.PHnNVTNx.d13.jpg). Granted these are likely not perfectly accurate and the intentions were/are to update as more information continues to become available.

If I have done anything incorrectly for the new York mapping community again I apologize.
jmapb (2026-05-09 16:55:43+00:00): Don't stress out! ;)

A fundamental principle of OSM is that what's on the map should match what's on the ground. Until there's an under-construction building that can be observed, mapping building=construction is premature. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dconstruction says "the building should have at least the walls of the first floor" -- I think that's fair.)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1471849035 is now rendering as a building, potentially confusing to anyone using this map for navigation and seeing just a hole in the ground. (The broken ground itself is already covered by the landuse=construction https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480796870.) So I've changed the footprint to proposed:building=yes and added a fixme tag to refine later.

As far as the height goes -- 567 feet has three significant figures, so converting to 172.82 adds false precision. 173 would be more appropriate, 172.8 in a pinch because feet are smaller than meters.
jmapb (2026-05-09 16:56:44+00:00): That said, if the address is 570 5th Avenue, the architect really should have gone for 570 feet! Or 570.5 even! Total missed opportunity.
MadCat3D (2026-05-11 21:40:27+00:00): Thank you for the information, I'm still a bit new to mapping and always learning something new.

And I agree a missed opportunity to make the building height the same as its address, it would have been great!
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 04:57:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). No point object for land
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177786856
TheNightRider (2026-02-04 00:13:30+00:00): 2026-02-01 survey: no phone number on the door, either. They don't want you to call them.
AngryPen (2026-07-01 00:55:01+00:00): I was actually wrong about this. How do I undo?
MassCartog (2026-01-28 14:46:53+00:00): Hi again, this is another example where I don't understand why you removed these tracks, There dose seem to be a network of tracks through this forest? Could you explain a bit further? Thanks
NeisBot (2026-01-28 07:31:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13505827271 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Psychology clinic"
---
Por exemplo, uma versão mais neutra e factual do seu texto poderia ser: "Clínica de psicologia"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-06 06:06:27+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178053820
TheSwavu (2026-01-31 23:50:11+00:00): Hi,

Does https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1471863136 really need to be mapped as a roundabout? It looks very much like some temporary roadworks:

https://youtu.be/gAkNhJzFZEw?si=k3rlCtNgB3gUX10H&t=32

That aren't really going to be around that long.

Thanks.
jordol (2026-02-01 00:49:34+00:00): Hi,
The information I have is that it will be a roundabout for the entire duration of the bridge rebuild, so 12 months+.

Could be wrong of course, happy to be corrected if there is any info that says it's only for a short time.
TheSwavu (2026-02-01 04:41:04+00:00): OK I'll add a map note to check again in 12 months.
evgenykatyshev (2026-01-30 12:59:02+00:00): Комментарий подозрительный. Звучит так, что удалили кусок существующей неофициальной тропы
kekspetrovich (2026-02-03 16:34:49+00:00): Там нет тропы. Только путь. Удалил, чтобы навигатор не заводил случайных людей на эту дорогу. Она предназначена для зимних прогулок, чтобы не ходить по одному маршруту туда и обратно. Зимой дорога через Диди и Патара Карты непроходима и лавиноопасна. Часть пути с направлением - это просто возможность пройти по лесу. Там, где я правил дорогу, уже есть настоящая лесная грязная дорога.
empty_child (2026-01-28 08:39:49+00:00): Hello sosomindiashvili,
Please, don't use a "name" tag in this case; it's better to use "ref"
peanuthole (2026-02-27 22:12:07+00:00): Middle Rocks are very existent (more so than South Ledge, which only pokes above water at low tide) and part of Malaysia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_Rocks
watmildon (2026-03-30 01:45:02+00:00): Great change! Welcome!!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-27 11:10:46+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and other mistagging for Lucid Private Offices POI in changeset 184688010

https://osm.org/changeset/184688010
Taya_S (2026-01-28 07:13:50+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177792000
Taya_S (2026-01-28 07:13:51+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177792000
NeisBot (2026-01-28 05:56:13+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (5 changesets) shows that 314 of your last 316 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23760616
Pan (2026-01-28 06:01:50+00:00): No need for review
fortera_au (2026-01-28 23:15:53+00:00): Hi, can you make sure your changeset comments are relevant to the change, this looks like it's a template used for whenever you add a road or make a highway classification change, and doesn't make it obvious which of the two it actually is.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177790281
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-04 19:28:53+00:00): Hello!

You used
crossing:markings=zebraa
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7782558760/history

Have you maybe meant
crossing:markings=zebra
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
NeisBot (2026-01-28 07:31:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13505941901 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Car dealership"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-06 06:06:29+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178169393
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:55:58+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 14 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1471432877 v2 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13502373747 v2
https://osm.org/node/13502373749 v2
https://osm.org/node/13502373750 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177791243
NeisReview (2026-02-05 06:18:50+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177899356
Taya_S (2026-02-12 17:33:45+00:00): Why is there a car parts shop named "JW Marriott Cairo Hotel Entrance Gate" here?
rempshaener (2026-01-28 18:16:15+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Den Namen hast du bereits von „Rettungswache“ auf „Bereitschaft“ umgestellt.
Was dann noch nicht ganz passt, ist das emergency=ambulance_station. Eher passend wäre dann emergency=disaster_response.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
Jaiden1978 (2026-01-28 20:22:13+00:00): Hallo Zurück,

eine schwierige Sache. Disaster_response klingt von der Beschreibung eher nach THW aber ich finde auch nichts passenderes. 
Danke für den Input.
rempshaener (2026-01-29 18:58:07+00:00): Hallo,
das wurde hier https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposal-vorschlag-der-das-technische-hilfswerk-thw-betrifft/107596/22 auch schon einmal mit unterschiedlichen Tendenzen diskutiert. Es ist jedenfalls nicht nur das THW damit abgedeckt.
Viele Grüße
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-27 11:10:54+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and other mistagging for Lucid Private Offices POI in changeset 184688084

https://osm.org/changeset/184688084
fortera_au (2026-01-28 23:13:22+00:00): Hi, you've merged a node used for Waldeck Oval with a node used in an administrative boundary way, these should be separate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177792402
eggie (2026-01-28 08:43:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback.. Het adres heb ik weer verwijderd. Bij OSM werken we met adresnodes.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-01-28 10:39:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13505998298 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "GPS tracking device store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-06 06:06:31+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178169395
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-01-28 10:39:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/3638824050 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Funeral home"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-06 06:06:33+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178169397
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
eggie (2026-01-28 09:13:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community