piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JAAS (2026-01-07 19:01:46+00:00): Hola zahewo,

He visto los cambios que ha estado realizando en OSM.
Parece ser algo innecesario el estar eliminando las etiquetas de `access=private` a las calles de acceso que evidentemente se encuentran dentro de una propiedad privada. No le encuentro algún beneficio hacer eso, así como tampoco parece lógico citar que esa etiqueta aplica únicamente en aquellos casos en los que aparece algún tipo de rótulo indicando que así sea. Por ejemplo, para acceder a mi casa existe una puerta SIN EXISTIR NINGÚN RÓTULO indicando que sea prohibido ingresar. Sin embargo, es obviamente un acceso privado al que no están invitados a acceder todos. Al no contar con la etiqueta respectiva `access=private`, podrían acceder personas utilizando algún tipo de ruteador, de acuerdo a cómo funcionan estos, causando posibles inconvenientes a los protagonistas. 

Le pediría que en lugar de editar cosas innecesarias, mejor lo haga editando tantos otros elementos que hacen falta agregar al mapa, que sirve a tantos alrededor del mundo.

Saludos,
JAAS
eerib (2026-01-07 03:27:50+00:00): Hello Beeeom,

The trails are correctly split at the cutblock boundary, have the destroyed lifecycle prefix for trails within the cutblock, and have the correct access restriction for the remaining portions of trail.

Thank you, eerib
Beeeom (2026-01-07 04:04:14+00:00): You STILL have it wrong. Clearly you are not acting in good faith and respecting these edits.  The orthoimagery does not reflect reality. The areas was harvested in Fall 2025.

My edits were correct, yet here you are again introducing errors from afar. I will be reporting this
PcMouse1 (2026-01-24 22:38:13+00:00): Hi Mahian,

Thank you for your contributions and welcome to OSM!
Everything looks good with your edit and is of high quality. Since you are a new mapper I have a few resources if you need assistance with future edits.
Resources can be found below. These lead to local user groups, the wiki and the Discord.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/
https://discord.gg/openstreetmap
osm.wiki/Map_features
osm.wiki/Canada

Finally, thank you for contributing.
Cheers, PcMouse1
ilias_ (2026-01-08 21:55:20+00:00): ??
ilias_ (2026-01-08 21:56:12+00:00): حيدتي الطريق على ڭدها
felipeeugenio (2026-01-07 11:49:53+00:00): Hola. La emergencia de un hospital no es un hospital por separado, se puede denotar simplemente con emergency=yes dentro del hospital.

Por otro lado, si no está en funcionamiento todavía, no hay hospital. VOy a hacer las correcciones correspondientes.

Saludos
NeisBot (2026-01-07 06:43:43+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/407605435 v2 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/4096490927 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176926154
Beeeom (2026-01-07 03:38:44+00:00): This was not vandalism!
eerib (2026-01-07 03:44:39+00:00): Hello Beeeom,

I have explained to you in changeset #176911989 discussion thread how access tags are applied.

If you would like to submit a complaint you can do so by emailing the Data Working Group - the moderation group of OpenStreetMap - at the following email.

data@openstreetmap.org

If you continue to ignore OpenStreetMap standards then your account may lose editing privileges' until you acknowledge the standards.

Thank you, eerib
Beeeom (2026-01-07 03:55:12+00:00): Fear not eerib, I will be submitting a complaint.

I've encouraged you to directly discuss these issues with me, however so far you have underhandly reverted all of my changes to date and have not taken me up on my offer. I do not consider you to be acting in good faith.
eerib (2026-01-07 04:10:11+00:00): Hello Beeeom,

I’m sorry to hear that you feel this way. I have made several attempts to explain the OpenStreetMap standards, including sharing links to relevant wiki pages to help you become more familiar with them. I have also suggested reaching out to the OpenStreetMap Community Forum for additional support or guidance.

In addition, I provided information on how to participate in the Trails Stewardship Initiative to advocate for your perspective, as well as how to propose changes or new standards within OpenStreetMap. I hope you will find these resources helpful and take the opportunity to review them.

Thank you,
eerib
arjunaraoc (2026-01-18 10:15:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177365982#map=15/17.83038/83.08339
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176926942
Kovoschiz (2026-01-07 10:44:57+00:00): As mentioned many times, please don't delete directly. Change them to `disused=yes` etc.
Kovoschiz (2026-01-07 13:45:53+00:00): 2. Please discuss before changing `old_name=` to `name=` , which has been attempted repeatedly. OSM is for what's  currently used. Use OHM for these.
Kovoschiz (2026-01-07 13:46:23+00:00): 3. Please don't attach other objects to roads. It doesn't reflect reality, and makes editing more difficult.
Kovoschiz (2026-01-07 13:47:03+00:00): 4. Can you confirm it's no longer used? What about the graves here?
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-07 14:54:49+00:00): Edit looks good, but I'd call it a crash, not an accident.  Accident implies something unavoidable, cars don't crash without one or more dangerously negligent drivers.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176927491
Sixthdim (2026-01-07 16:01:25+00:00): Thanks for the note. I'll keep that terminology and distinction in mind moving forward.
VLD282 (2026-01-09 15:31:58+00:00): Hi marc_marc,

Hope this message finds you well. I wanted to reach out about some removal of the crossing=* tag on features like way 859824958. Based on the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing), the use of crossing=* appears to have been correct on these features. Could you help me understand the reason for their removal?

Thanks and happy mapping, 
VLD282/Dylan
marc__marc (2026-01-09 16:56:24+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for asking.

The usage of crossing=* to describe the marking have been for conflicting values  marked/zebra is in practice superseded by the approval of the crossing:markings key to indicate the marking.
The crossing key can then focus back to its original approved value describing the danger of the crossing:
- with traffic lights
- without traffic lights but marked
- unmarked

it seems you are doing the same for ex with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/687242754/history/3 isn't it ?

I have several others changeset about crossing=traffic_signals
for ex
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175881472

Regards,
Marc
VLD282 (2026-01-09 17:42:45+00:00): Thank you for your prompt response! I understand your point regarding my example; in that case though, the crossing=* tag was maintained, with only the value changed from crossing=traffic_signals to crossing=uncontrolled. My main concern was that the crossing=* tags had been completely removed. As noted in the wiki, crossing=* is required if crossing:markings=* is used (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:markings#:~:text=Requires,crossing%3D*).

If I interpret your comment correctly though, it seems we are aligned on the precedent for using crossing=*. In that case, would you agree that we can consider adding crossing=* to those nodes and ways where it has been removed?

Best regards,  
Dylan
marc__marc (2026-01-11 08:39:00+00:00): The wiki documentation stating that crossing=* is both mandatory and recommended is obviously incorrect. I fix it.

It is obviously a good idea to add crossing=* when you have the information, but it is just as normal not to add it or not to keep a conflicting value when you do not have better information.
I will do a third pass to add crossing safety when the information is available
arjunaraoc (2026-01-18 10:05:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176928212
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-25 02:38:19+00:00): DWG revert - sock-puppet

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177667205
TG-map4 (2026-01-07 15:45:41+00:00): Hello, the street K58 between Harzheim and Eiserfey should have long been finished in autumn 2025. That was delayed to end of 2025. Now it is 2026 and you even extend it. Do you have more information which parts of the K58 are finished and when everything is finally done? I found no update on the website of Stadt Mechernich. I would like to update this note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4348661
Koellefornia (2026-01-07 16:04:47+00:00): Nothing's finished yet. It's still closed and under construction.
NeisBot (2026-01-07 06:46:39+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13436995754 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Hearing care services in Charlotte NC"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-17 17:05:38+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176937372
bh-e (2026-01-07 05:29:04+00:00): Connected a new opening from Infopark phase 2 to public road. Sorry to mention this in commit message.
NeisBot (2026-01-07 06:46:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13436999492 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Training center for Agile and IT courses"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-17 17:05:38+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177344346
NeisBot (2026-01-07 06:46:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/9567678965 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Kyokushin Karate School in Kolkata"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-17 17:05:39+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177344347
NeisBot (2026-01-07 06:46:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13437029303 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Garage door repair service in Calgary"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-17 17:05:40+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/177064835
NeisBot (2026-01-07 06:46:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13437030235 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Clarity Acne and Aesthetics in North Suffolk Virginia"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-18 08:33:43+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176937267
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-18 04:32:45+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19491
NeisBot (2026-01-07 06:46:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11021349216 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "IT recruitment agency in Ghaziabad"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 08:33:43+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177363496
Superadlen (2026-01-07 06:11:43+00:00): merci
NeisBot (2026-01-07 06:46:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/1357561220 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Urology clinic in Johar Town Lahore"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 08:33:46+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177363497
(Deleted leftovers after several edits)
NeisBot (2026-01-07 06:46:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/928762967 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Hotel in Birtamode near Paschim Bus Stand"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-18 08:33:47+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/176931754
NeisBot (2026-01-07 06:46:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13437058726 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Audiology care services in Huntersville NC"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-18 08:33:47+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176936599
NeisBot (2026-01-08 06:58:38+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/1357561220 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Urologist in Johar Town Lahore"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-18 08:33:47+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/177363497
NLBRT (2026-01-08 14:11:57+00:00): Hi there!

While I understand these mapping efforts are coordinated between riders/data teams, please specify the actual thing done with the changeset, which in this case would be something like "Updated a strech of connector road to under construction". Also, it would be preferred if you add "GPS Traces" or the actual indicator of the same as the source in the source section.
Jakob Vase (2026-01-09 10:05:53+00:00): Hej osmviborg, hvorfor fjernede du adressen på BusinessHouse? Er ny i det her, så vil gerne forstå hvad jeg gjorde forkert.
osmviborg (2026-01-09 11:13:16+00:00): Adresser bliver automatisk importeret, og vedligeholdt, på adressepunkter. Automatikken kan ikke håndtere andre end egne tilførte adresse- oplysninger. Jeg har linket dit POI til det adresse- punkt du brugte. Ses her: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20062745
Jakob Vase (2026-01-09 11:41:09+00:00): Ah cool. Så gør jeg det samme fremover. Tak!
NeisBot (2026-01-08 06:58:39+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13437080657 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Medical aesthetics and wellness clinic in Wellington"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-18 08:33:48+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176936725
micheleOSM3 (2026-01-08 06:26:35+00:00): Hi, please use more descriptive comments, they help those who map after you.
pwbriggs (2026-01-07 19:51:01+00:00): Your edit looks good, thanks! I will take a bit (likely a couple weeks) before this change shows up in Organic Maps / CoMaps. Those apps only download new data from OpenStreetMap on a rotating cycle of somewhere between a week and a month.
NeisBot (2026-01-08 07:03:56+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1465020811 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "City of Nurnberg"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 08:33:50+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177363498
(Deleted leftovers after several edits)
Matija Nalis (2026-01-12 15:52:36+00:00): Pozdrav!

Vidim da si prije par dana označio nekoliko željezničko-cestovnih prijelaza u Požegi kao crossing:barrier=double_half -- sjećaš li se koji je bio izvor za odabir vrste rampe?

Taj tag se naime koristi za označavanja kada postoje 4 polubranika (dva sa svake strane ceste), što mislim da nemamo situaciju u Hrvatskoj? Obično imamo ili pune branike (jedna brklja sa svaka strane blokira *oba* smjera ceste) ili češće polubranike (koji blokiraju samo traku u jednom smjeru).

Znaš li možda koji od njih trebaju biti?

Hvala i pozdrav!
gpavic (2026-01-13 07:38:36+00:00): Točno, sad sam shvatio da u stvari treba biti "half"
Matija Nalis (2026-01-13 16:17:24+00:00): Hvala na potvrdi i ispravku!
Montaherul Islam (2026-01-07 07:42:36+00:00): wow great
literan (2026-01-07 09:34:05+00:00): не надо вносить свои личные точки на общую карту. откачу
NeisBot (2026-01-08 06:58:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13437165096 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bicycle rental shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 08:33:50+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177363499
Sakari_N (2026-01-08 15:27:43+00:00): Moi ja tervetuloa muokkaamaan openstreetmappia!

Olit lisännyt tälle polulle bicycle=no -tiedon. Mihin pyöräilykielto perustuu? On melko harvinaista että polulla pyöräily olisi kiellettyä, siksi kysymys...
LSTJ JT (2026-01-09 05:55:04+00:00): Muutos ei perustu siihen, että pyöräily olisi kiellettyä, vaan vaikeakulkuisuuteen. Polun alapäässä on oja ylitettävänä ja muutenkin kyseessä on tiheä metsä ja jyrkähkö mäki
Sakari_N (2026-01-09 14:35:55+00:00): Kiitos vastauksesta! Bicycle=no tosiaan tarkoittaa OSM:ssa sitä että pyöräily on *lailla kielletty*. Yleensä siis kyse on tieliikennelain asettamista rajoituksista. Tämä koskee muutenkin access-tageja, no tarkoittaa ehdotonta, lakiin perustuvaa kieltoa.

Jos polku on pyörällä "vaikea" ajettava, niin siihen voi merkata maastopyöräilyyn tarkoitetun mtb:scale= tagin, kuvaamaan polun vaikeusastetta.

Yleisesti kulkua varten voi merkitä surface= smoothness= ja trail_visibility= tageihin arvot, jotka kuvaavatr todellista tilannetta maastossa.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale
zstadler (2026-02-02 10:25:30+00:00): שלום נחל יתלה,

תודה על תרומתך למיפוי ב OSM!

בבקשה אל תוסיף למפה הפומבית נקודות אישיות או הנחיות לטיולים אישיים.
לשם כך, תוכל ליצור מסלולים, לשמור אותם בענן ולשתף עם מי שתרצה.

תודה!