piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
AntiCompositeNumber (2024-03-11 01:21:59+00:00): The area around the Basin is signed as a "Bike Walk Zone" -- the intention appears to be to require cyclists to dismount given https://www.cannonmt.com/things-to-do/activities/recreation-path . Just because nobody does it doesn't mean it's not signed that way.
Patr1k_P (2023-11-17 17:34:48+00:00): zmazali ste budovy s adresou, treba sledovat znacky na lavej strane

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51103530
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51103082
Dodko (2023-11-16 11:41:27+00:00): Budova nemá byť spojená s hranicou obce https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11353667452 hranice si treba skryť.
habi (2023-11-16 09:25:55+00:00): Also updated some landuse and aligned things to swisstopo imagery.
MarcoR (2023-11-17 13:52:10+00:00): Ciao e benvenuti su OpenStreetMap!

Mancava solamente il tipo di attività (shop=hearing_aids) che ho aggiunto io.

Buon mapping,
Marco.
Dodko (2023-11-16 11:30:22+00:00): Nakreslené budovy aby neboli krivé treba zarovnať do pravého uhla, klávesová skratka Q alebo pravý klik a "usporiadať do pravého uhla"
Dodko (2023-11-16 11:32:15+00:00): Dom s adresou ste nemali vymazať, len upraviť rozmery. Teraz treba adresu doplniť do nového domu.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/62041717/history
Patr1k_P (2023-11-17 17:29:13+00:00): zmazali ste budovy s adresou, treba sledovat znacky na lavej strane

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61997548
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61997347
rskedgell (2023-11-16 16:11:05+00:00): I'm pretty sure that the towers on Tower Bridge were still there - and still buildings, not just bridge piers - when I ran across it last night.
rskedgell (2023-11-24 07:48:24+00:00): The edits to Tower Bridge North and South Towers were reversed by @Cebderby in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144380733
evkalina (2023-11-27 17:05:13+00:00): towers and bridge piers are two different things. in the case of tower bridge the piers are the base of the towers.
rskedgell (2023-11-27 19:15:54+00:00): Yes, they are. You could have added separate polygons for the bridge piers rather than removing building=* tags from buildings.
StC (2023-11-17 11:28:29+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a introduit une discontinuité dans l'itinéraire pédestre (en principe balisé en blanc et rouge) qui passe par là. Est-ce possible d'en retrouver et rétablir la trace au niveau de la Place Grenette et de la Place de la République ?

Merci par avance
Virgile1994 (2023-11-18 13:46:48+00:00): C'est corrigé normalement.
StC (2023-11-18 13:56:04+00:00): Merci !
Dodko (2023-11-16 11:34:09+00:00): vymazali ste množstvo domov s adresami, teraz bude horšia navigácia pre kuriérov
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71728161/history
adresy treba doplniť.
Dodko (2023-11-16 11:45:42+00:00): Tie domy tam existujú vymazali ste ich aj s adresami.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126061416/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148519216/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148519575/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148519198/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148519513/history
Dodko (2023-11-16 11:38:29+00:00): Zmazali ste budovu s adresou, treba ju naspäť doplniť.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1060200645/history
Bobropiton (2023-11-17 08:54:35+00:00): Здравствуйте. Ваш пакет правок я откатил до изначального состояния, потому что:
-снесли тэги name с дорог
-снесли тэги lanes с дорог
-снесли маршруты транспорта с дорог.
Недостающий поворот на площади я нарисовал заново.
Разделил улицу свободы на 2 вея по причине наличия бетонного отбойника. Отбойник и бетонную стену так же отрисовал.
Пакет правок:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144128487
rskedgell (2023-11-16 16:16:10+00:00): Why did you delete "Girl with a dolphin" and its associated history and recreate it as a new object?

The footway area which you deleted still exists, although there might be a justification to change it to area:highway=footway.

Please use meaningful changeset comments - "fix track" does not adequately describe what you did, or why you did it.
rskedgell (2023-11-24 07:53:00+00:00): Original version of "Girl with a dolphin" reinstated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144396518
evkalina (2023-11-27 17:01:56+00:00): don't remember exactly. most probably to modify so it appeared better in the map.

if you don't agree with the justification, you are free to modify it.
rskedgell (2023-11-27 19:14:33+00:00): Tagging for the renderer is not a reason to delete an existing object along with its history.
Dodko (2023-11-16 11:48:58+00:00): Vymazali ste domy s adresami, ako bude fungovať kuriér?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73355517/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73355591/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73355499/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73354367/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73354361/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73354357/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73354356/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73354354/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436872005/history
Baloo Uriza (2023-11-16 16:31:24+00:00): Might be worth looking at Denver Avenue Station for how to name and ref platforms within a station
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144087526
michael_ua (2023-11-18 17:58:32+00:00): Як розуміти ваші зміни? Чому тут 2 будинки тепер?
Dodko (2023-11-16 11:56:33+00:00): Vymazané domy s adresami
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148519525/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148519494/history
user_5359 (2023-11-18 08:34:21+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/11353775678 one of two hundred fifty five objects). What is the mean of the tag act_eco = T?

Bonjour ! Jetez un coup d'œil sur le site http://www.osm.org/node/11353775678 (un des deux cent cinquante-cinq objets). Quelle est la moyenne du tag act_eco = T ?
eggie (2023-11-16 11:36:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-11-16 11:38:50+00:00): lanes 0  heb ik verwijderd. Dat kan fysiek niet... straatnaam toegevoegd

MVG
eggie
Dodko (2023-11-16 11:43:00+00:00): Vymazali ste dom s adresou, treba ich doplniť.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126061437/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148519620/history
Norbert Dichter (2024-02-25 20:07:43+00:00): @Geohprofe I squared some 88 buildings mapped by you.

"In iD: draw an area and label it as Building, then correct for right angles with the Q key. Most buildings are rectangular so make buildings rectangular even if a shadow, tree or roof pitch make it appear otherwise."

Please take note, and keep on mapping.
gscholz (2023-11-18 08:29:35+00:00): Hi Patricia,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and duplicate/overlapping buildings:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=28.05227&lat=-15.54710&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144088469

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
BCNorwich (2023-11-16 11:11:07+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Sorry, but the house numbers are not the names. Please remove the instances of number names, and tag the numbers as addr:housenumber=???

Need any help just ask.

Regards Bernard.
themuffinman (2023-11-16 11:18:04+00:00): Hi Bernard, 
Thank you - changed!
Frans S (2024-01-22 09:56:49+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
inaccurate mapped.
Follow the rooflines more precise.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144088781
map per (2023-11-17 11:33:54+00:00): Hallo MWE69a,

du hast hier den memorial und den memorial:conflict Tag in einem Tag vermischt. In (1) kann man das sehen, das ist die Zeile "memorial=war_memorial:conflict:WW2". Das sollten aber zwei Zeilne seien, mit "memorial=war_memorial" und "memorial:conflict=WW2".

Im ID editor kannst du die Tags sehen, wenn du unter "Bearbeite Objekt" den Unterpunkt "Eigenschaften" ausklappst.

Schreib gerne, wenn du noch Fragen hast oder wenn das Trennen der Tags geklappt hat.

Viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11292567772
map per (2023-11-17 15:15:57+00:00): Dein Korrekturversuch hat leider nicht geklappt (vgl. (1))
MWE69a (2023-11-17 15:50:29+00:00): also 3x memorial ?

memorial
memorial=war_memorial
memorial:conflict=WW2

herrgott, dieser angloscheisz.
map per (2023-11-17 17:41:17+00:00): Ja, drei mal:
historic=memorial
memorial=war_memorial
memorial:conflict=WW2

Es gibt im ID editor aber kein vereinfachtes und ins Deutsche übersetztes Feld für memorial:conflict. Statdessen musst du das im Abschnitt  "Eigenschaften" als neuen Tag hinzufügen. (Der "Eigenschaften" Abschnitt ist standardmäßig ausgeblendet, du musst also einmal auf den ">" neben "Eigenschaften" klicken, damit die Tabelle angezeigt wird)
map per (2023-11-18 07:05:49+00:00): Perfekt, jetzt passt alles!
gscholz (2023-11-21 08:49:29+00:00): Hi Marsican Bear,
this changeset has left behind errors regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=13.66999&lat=42.01226&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144089258

This kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Please also have a look of the errors the changeset lists here. Please do not ignore these warnings.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Frans S (2023-12-05 16:31:57+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped. mostly just rectangular mapped, despite the roofline is more divers.
Connected nodes of buildings to each other.
Buildings hardly squared.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144090012
johsin18 (2023-11-17 06:40:24+00:00): Hi VADB,
you accidentally also modified a bus platform:
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=144090660
Please fix that again.
Best, johsin18
Frans S (2023-12-05 14:03:04+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. however, Often not squared.
Please collect mapped buildings and upload them together rather than upload every single building

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144091143
Marek-M (2024-05-07 13:27:31+00:00): Cześć, chyba dla tej drogi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161748452 nadałeś nazwę z przystanku autobusowego. Pewnie przez jakąś pomyłkę. Poprawisz?
vojtechzaboril (2024-03-01 14:36:12+00:00): Silnice není ve výstavbě (alepoň podle odkazu). Změnil jsem ji na silnici v plánu (highway=proposed)
Frans S (2023-12-05 13:51:26+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings often oversized.
Not accurate mapped. (just a rectangular instead of following the outlines.)


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144092208
woodpeck (2023-11-16 11:58:24+00:00): Dear user aracho, welcome to OSM. In this changeset you have deleted a lot of buildings, only to re-draw them with a little offset. Large deletions like that can set alarm bells ringing. If you are improving an existing building, try to just move it to the right location rather than deleting and re-creating it. Also, when deleting lots of buildings it is good to specify a reason in the changeset comment (e.g. "removing buildings that were destroyed by flood" or so), so that people know it is not an accident.
Taya_S (2023-11-17 16:56:39+00:00): foot=discouraged and bicycle=discouraged maybe?
gscholz (2023-11-21 08:46:54+00:00): Hi Alexis04132,
your recent changesets have created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=16.84925&lat=41.10954&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144093532

This kind of errors irritate routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?

Kind regards
Guido
ALu68 (2023-11-17 21:42:29+00:00): Hallo MWE69a, 
die Industriefläche mit Kraftwerk https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1224433585 hast du über das bestehende Kraftwerk https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1224433585 erstellt.
Zudem passen die Abmasse der Fläche nicht zum Luftbild.
Füge bitte die zusätzlichen Informationen zum älteren Objekt hinzu und lösche dann way/1224433585

Gruß.
MWE69a (2023-11-17 21:50:52+00:00): Hallo,
was passt denn da nicht ?
Ich versteh nur Bahnhof (bzw. Bahnhofsgelände).
Und die Quallenangabe liegt doch auch vor, ne.
Schönen Abend. MWE69a.
ALu68 (2023-11-17 21:52:49+00:00): Sorry zweimal das gleiche Objekt eingfügt.
Das ist das bestehende Kraftwerk: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47198820
SomeoneElse (2023-11-16 12:21:37+00:00): The request to the DWG was "can I delete the Russian name" and the answer was "yes", given that there was no evidence of branding in that language.  
The person making the request didn't do the update, so I have, including to website and opening hours.
The tagging as "shop=computer" rather than e.g. "office=company" is probably worth discussing, but that's one for people more local than me.
user_15484153 (2023-11-20 14:09:14+00:00): incorrect edit and inappropriate naming. deleted
KasperSFranz (2023-11-16 20:51:44+00:00): you have removed steakhouse from the name of the below node, are you sure that is correct? they are naming it as Bar + Block steakhouse on their website as well https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6365875576/history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144094470
woodpeck (2023-11-16 13:09:58+00:00): Dear Jinx Naleo, you have deleted a large number of buildings in this changeset which can set some alarm bells ringing with people watching OSM. Try not to delete and re-draw things, and instead change existing things when they are not accurate. And if you delete a lot of things, put in a good changeset comment that says why (e.g. "these buildings were destroyed" or so).
womped (2024-06-01 07:54:14+00:00): Hi Jeronomade, I noticed you added a lot of information to OSM - which is great! Thats for contributing!

Unfortunately, some of the POIs you added seem to be more like "notes" to the map and do not represent real objects, e.g.:

 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11355603576 name:en="Caution difficult passage, need to climb with rope". The tagging means that there is some sort of information board for tourists (tourism:information), but the added name indicates that this is more of a private note
 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11368658371 name:en="Place for tents in the bushes near the sea and archeological site". This is tagged as a tourism:camp_site. Those tags should be "used to map a campsite [...] an area, usually divided into a number of pitches, where people can camp overnight using tents, camper vans, caravans (aka RVs or motorhomes).". The name indicates that this is an informal place where one might set up his tent - such POIs are usually not mapped in OSM. You added a whole buch of those informal places to the map.
 
It seems that most of the objects you added are more like personal notes or objects that are not represented on the ground. Those should not be added to the OSM database.
youbab (2023-11-21 09:50:03+00:00): L'attribut bus_guideway me semble incorrecte ici. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway=bus_guideway
-> Description
Une voie dédiée aux bus qui sont guidé, ne convient pas aux autres trafics.
Ici, c'est une voie de bus classique
youbab (2023-11-21 09:51:21+00:00): Pour ce tronçon https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24453036
dunnno (2023-11-21 12:14:39+00:00): Bonjour, il n’y a pas de bus qui passent dans cette rue. Source : j’y travaille.
user_5359 (2023-11-16 14:53:35+00:00): Hello! Please add the hashatg to the change set not to the OSM data.
felipeeugenio (2023-11-16 13:55:21+00:00): Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones.

Cual es la fuente de todos los nombres?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144095413
gscholz (2023-11-18 09:09:52+00:00): Hi Khyle,
your recent edits have left behind several errors regarding duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=120.78664&lat=14.27658&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144095573

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-11-21 07:21:27+00:00): Hi Khyle,
these errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
SomeoneElse (2023-11-17 11:13:14+00:00): Hello HaPe-CZ,
Lots of your comments in this squence of changes are just "fix X" (where X here is "tramway".  Please try and use better descriptions to help people understand what you are doing.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2023-11-17 11:13:40+00:00): Dobrý den HaPe-CZ,
Spousta vašich komentářů v této řadě změn je pouze „opravit X“ (kde X je zde „tramvaj“. Zkuste prosím používat lepší popisy, abyste lidem pomohli pochopit, co děláte.
S pozdravem,
Andy
HaPe-CZ (2023-11-17 13:33:33+00:00): Například takto? ... Opravena poloha tramvajového tělesa podle aktuálního snímkování protože předchozí zakreslení bylo z důvodu snímkování s nízkým rozlišením nesprávné.
Gregory Peony (2025-07-11 17:48:55+00:00): Good changeset comment, size and theme. In future where practicable please state the sources of the information. Aerial imagery was probably used to identify the roads and align map them but the speed limit signs are not directly visible in the aerial imagery. It would be better to state e.g. source=survey if you have seen the signs yourself or perhaps add a link to licence compatible street level imagery where the signs are directly visible. This makes it easier to verify the information you're uploading and make it more likely to stick around on OSM. Thanks you for your contribution hope this helps.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144096320
Tomasz_GIS (2023-11-20 12:35:59+00:00): Witam,
Mała uwaga, zgodnie z EMUiA, ul. Turkusowa dochodzi do Kwiatowej, natomiast ul. Kwiatowa łączy się z Drzewicką.
Pozdrawiam.
Sebastian | Yanosik (2023-11-20 12:46:29+00:00): Witam,
Zasugerowałem się poprzednim stanem nazw ulic, gdzie Turkusowa była przedłużeniem Kwiatowej w stronę Drzewickiej. Dziękuję za uwagę, nazwy ulic poprawiam.
Pozdrawiam.
Marrel (2023-11-17 19:12:07+00:00): Hello!

I noticed the paths added in Bois du Trait-Carré. Have you surveyed the paths recently? I walked the woods just two days ago, and I didn't put those paths because I couldn't see them.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-11-17 19:24:09+00:00): I don't know, I just added connections to roads so the paths that were already mapped were connected to the rest of the network to make sure they don't create unconnected islands. Looking at the current Géodésie Québec aerial imagery, most of them seem legit though, but could have been removed recently (I checked photos from 2018 and 2022). Feel free to remove any that you confirm are not usable now.
Marrel (2023-11-17 20:16:30+00:00): Alright, thanks! I'll take another walk in a few days. I know many paths in those woods become invisible at some places, but I'll try to see if there's a near-invisible path or none at all, and I'll update accordingly.
Marrel (2023-11-21 22:07:01+00:00): I went to survey the woods to find the paths, and there was one I couldn't find either from the road or from inside the forest. I also noticed from both sides that the forest is quite dense, so no path would be walkable. I took the initiative to shrink the path accordingly.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-11-21 22:16:59+00:00): Perfect!
confusedbuffalo (2023-11-16 13:37:58+00:00): Also fixed some postcodes which crept into this changeset, from NSUL
Fasha4 (2023-11-21 17:40:53+00:00): Nie wydaje mi się, żeby było zgodne z polityką OSM zmieniać tag highway na construction, jeżeli droga jest zamknięta tylko na względnie krótki czas.
Cytat z wiki:
"Ponieważ dane OSM są często używane w trybie offline (a zatem mogą mieć kilka miesięcy), tagujemy tylko tereny budowy (w szczególności drogi i linie kolejowe), jeśli planuje się je zamknąć na co najmniej sześć do dziewięciu miesięcy."
Patchanka (2023-11-20 19:04:04+00:00): bonjour
merci de ne pas indiquer d'information personnelle et de ne pas vandaliser la carte.
Lien à donner à l'enseignant de SNT : https://www.openstreetmap.fr/les-bonnes-pratiques-pour-contribuer-a-openstreetmap-en-snt/
Patchanka (2023-11-20 19:01:05+00:00): bonjour
vous avez demandé la vérification de vos modifications. Il me semble que c'est du n'importe quoi, donc je vais annuler tout ça. N'hésitez pas à me dire si je me trompe...
N'hésitez pas non plus à donner ce lien à votre enseignant de SNT : https://www.openstreetmap.fr/les-bonnes-pratiques-pour-contribuer-a-openstreetmap-en-snt/
MarcoR (2023-11-17 13:41:48+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap!

Il parco che hai disegnato non mi sembrava realmente esistente così l'ho convertito in un'area residenziale.

Per qualsiasi problema puoi commentare qua sotto, contattare la comunità italiana o anche semplicemente ridisegnare quello che volevi mappare :)

Buon mapping,
Marco.
Patchanka (2023-11-20 18:52:29+00:00): bonjour
ces modifications ne m'ont pas l'air très sérieuses... Pouvez-vous m'en dire un peu plus ? Êtes-vous en cours de SNT ?
En l'absence de réponse, je vais les annuler.
gendy54 (2025-10-04 13:17:26+00:00): Je les ai annulé en tombant dessus dans le cadre d'#AdopteUne Commune.
Patchanka (2025-10-04 13:44:57+00:00): ah ben j'avais légèrement oublié de le faire dis donc ^^
merci