piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rskedgell (2026-02-03 09:56:03+00:00): Thanks.

I've added two crossings of Beckenham Hill Road:
* an accessible crossing (lowered kerbs, tactile paving) SW of the junction with Blacklands Road/Brangbourne Road
* an island crossing between Chestnut Close and Bromley Road (normal kerb, no tactile paving, crossing way tagged with wheelchair=no )

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178042183
NeisBot (2026-02-03 06:14:16+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1472774098 v2 | 7 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178027437
NeisReview (2026-02-11 05:07:34+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178098649
nevw (2026-02-03 02:48:56+00:00): I added the driveway for Wallace South apartments and this will assist routing to find the right entrance once the navigation apps update.
The address for the shopping centre land is 22-28 so I fixed that
Hugoren Martinako (2026-02-03 13:19:10+00:00): Bones! T'has fotut https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12521107230/history/7. Aquest node representa a una entitat singular de població (ref:ine=*). Si no és correcta la localització, s'ha de moure on toqui, però no es deu esborrar.

Ja recupero el node esborrat.
Salutacions
blacx (2026-02-03 14:13:38+00:00): Ni ICGC ni Catastro ho tenen, segons aquests dos es la Tossa tot. Ahir vaig crear el projecte d'importacio de catastro i a les adreces d'aquesta zona me les posava com a Urb. Tossa.
No li vaig donar massa voltes i vaig pensar que estava malament i ja esta. 
Però amb el que hem dius imagino doncs que la de roderes deu ser aquestes quatre cases que hi han una uns 100-200 metres mes al sud-est, ho moure alla perque on es ara segur que esta malament.
blacx (2026-02-03 14:17:13+00:00): Veient que a IGN si que hi es i està una mica mes cap a aquesta direccio.
Hugoren Martinako (2026-02-03 14:42:33+00:00): L'assumpte és que els ajuntaments li diuen al INE/IDESCAT quins són cadascuna de les parts habitades dins del seu municipi. Per Vilanova pots fer un cop d'ull aqui: https://www.idescat.cat/codis/?id=50&n=9&c=252516

Aleshores, tenim 4 entitats: el mateix poble de Vilanova, el Secà de Merler, el del Tabac i aquest conflictiu (me'n recordo que no vaig trobar-ho ni p'atrás). El que podem saber és que és un nucli (llavors hi ha cases plegades), no massa gran (13 hab.). Amb allò, s'ha de cercar, dins del municipi, on es pot trobar-hi.

Ara l'IGN ofereix una API (tot i que pot no estar 100% correcta), on pots buscar per la referència: https://api-features.ign.es/collections/nuc/items?codine=25251000401
blacx (2026-02-03 15:16:52+00:00): Gracies pels link. Doncs suposo que si que tot aixo es Roderes, quan fagi la importacio de la zona ja canviare el nom a les adreces
felipeeugenio (2026-02-03 12:12:33+00:00): Hola Julián
Bienvenido a OSM Chile. Gracias por tus ediciones.
Estuvimos mirando tus ediciones con otros maperos y nos preocupan, porque tienen no solo bastantes errores, que es lo normal entre quienes comienzan, pero además pasa que los nombres parecen ser todos descriptivos. Algunos de frentón son inventados y pasa además que los nombres de algunos cerros y esteros que agregaste no coinciden con la cartografía oficial.

Además, pasa que te comenté personalmente varios changesets y no solo no hubo respuesta, si no que además seguiste mapeando, modificando las cosas que te arreglamos, pero a la vez incorporando los mismos elementos, a veces con nombres distintos de los que tu mismo agregaste en primer lugar.

Entonces podrás entender que esto tiene buen aspecto.

Los errores no son graves y nosotros estamos para ayudarte, pero necesitas por favor dejar de hacer ediciones tan grandes y ponerte en contacto con la comunidad. Hay maperos por todo Chile, incluso unos bastante activos en la zona donde vives, pero necesitamos que vayas un poco mas lento y entres al chat de la comunidad en Telegram (app muy similar a whatsapp) en el link https://t.me/OSMcl. Por ahí es mucho mejor mapear.

Por lo pronto, te preguntamos si todos esos caminos de entrada a predios son reales, porque parecen ser los nombres de quienes viven ahí.

Esperamos respuesta y nos vemos en el chat.
Saludos
dknelson9876 (2026-02-03 02:50:09+00:00): Hi Flap Slimy Outward,

When you downgraded this portion of road from highway=secondary to highway=tertiary, did you release that it was at secondary because it is part of the movements for the intersection of State St/12300 S? 

This is a special "ThrU-Turn" intersection, where drivers wanting to turn left from southbound State St to eastbound 12300 S must instead go straight south onto Minuteman Dr, do a u-turn, then turn right onto 12300 S.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-02-03 04:45:08+00:00): No, I did not realize that at all. I didn't see any special turn restriction relations that would have given me information to act differently. I will revert this changeset as well (maybe you can create the appropriate turn restriction relations to convey that information?).
dknelson9876 (2026-02-03 05:45:32+00:00): Thank you for reverting. Those turn restrictions are already in place, added as part of https://osm.org/changeset/17169932 in 2013
jptolosa (2026-02-03 17:11:37+00:00): Hola Julián, desde qué fuente estás obteniendo los nombres de cerros y quebradas en este sector?
Julián Ávila (2026-02-03 22:19:52+00:00): De los locales ya que tengo un parcela allí y ellos me nombraron los nombres de las quebradas del sector Los Quillayes.
dknelson9876 (2026-02-03 02:44:32+00:00): Hi Flap Slimy Outward,

This is not the first time I've said that there are times when a highway numbers belong in the name=* tag. With you deleting the appropriate name=*, name:prefix=*, and name:full=* tags, the North Salt Lake addresses along this road can't correctly match to this street. Please correct this within 7 days, or I will fix it for you.

And why did you also delete the perfectly valid name="Beck Street" (and subtags) along other portions of this road?
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-02-03 04:40:32+00:00): I wasn't sure where Beck Street began and Highway 89 ended.  It appeared to be along the incomplete at-grade intersection with the frontage road, but I wasn't sure.

Also, shouldn't ref=US_89 be enough? Or does the highway specifically need something in name=* for addresses to work properly?
dknelson9876 (2026-02-03 05:39:49+00:00): Thank you for reverting.

I would not be surprised if data consumers use ref=* to match addr:housenumber=* in other places, but in this case no, the ref=* on its own is not sufficient, because:

1. That leaves out the street prefix, which is a required part of the address (e.g. "North" in "989 North Highway 89" at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35936661)
2. It would be unreasonable to expect data consumers to know that "US 89", "Highway 89", and "US Highway 89" can refer to the same thing here, or in other places that "SR 132", "Highway 132", and "State Highway 132" could all refer to the same road.

Thus, in addition to the ref=* value that matches shields, we map name=* (and name:prefix=* and name:full=*) values that match the spelled out name on street signs. (e.g. https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/asellars?lat=40.83269843&lng=-111.91470327&z=17&pKey=919040351973903&focus=photo&x=0.5105628121557317&y=0.4326672500813823&zoom=0)
PumpkinPieAficionado (2026-02-03 18:38:45+00:00): Correction: Source used was Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2025-09-01
Xvtn (2026-02-04 13:26:47+00:00): Hi, did you notice that some of the roads you removed name=* from also had name:prefix and name:full? For example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/503285561
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-02-04 16:53:45+00:00): I believe I reverted a changeset I made that removed the names.
NeisBot (2026-02-03 06:14:25+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 20 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1472910035 v3 | 12 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1472910042 v2 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1016771772 v8 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178030071
fluffycupcakes (2026-02-03 07:43:36+00:00): Hello. This golf course does not seem to exist anymore on any recent imagery. Have you checked Esri and Mapbox imagery before adding the features?
flohoff (2026-02-03 07:44:48+00:00): Good catch,
gestern war hier das routing kaputt gegangen. Ich hatte den mapper auch angeschrieben.

Jetzt ist es zurück geschwenkt:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=1205210,1206394
fluffycupcakes (2026-02-03 07:43:44+00:00): Hello. This golf course does not seem to exist anymore on any recent imagery. Have you checked Esri and Mapbox imagery before adding the features?
b-jazz (2026-02-03 21:40:42+00:00): Can you post a link to more recent imagery? The three imagery providers I use all seem to have indications of a golf course here. Even the behemoth company's sat imagery doesn't show the construction of apartments yet. I'm not doubting you. I would just like to see evidence.
fluffycupcakes (2026-02-03 22:49:27+00:00): https://arcg.is/104z0H3
Here is 2024 Esri imagery of this location, and the golf course is no longer present on it

You can view the same location using https://api.mapbox.com/ using their even more recent imagery and the early preparations for construction are already visible on it, with the golf course not being present either.
Jonathan Ng@ (2026-02-03 05:12:18+00:00): 这里开麦当劳了吗？
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-25 03:54:48+00:00): Which side of the road are you on, because NSW DCS says this is #2, while #13 is across the road.
Justin1234 (2026-02-04 05:02:23+00:00): I think the entrance should be mapped as a single way since there's no physical separation
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178034099
VitKlim (2026-02-04 08:07:12+00:00): "Hi Justin1234, you are right and thanks for clarifying! 
I have checked these edits by our sources and made necessary changes. You can view my edits here:https://osmcha.org/changesets/178082340  
Best, _VitKlim"
dmlls (2026-02-09 15:08:02+00:00): Hola! Veo que eres un nuevo usuario, así que bienvenido a OSM :)

Solo un par de apuntes:

• Los valores de las etiquetas https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone o https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mobile tienen que incluir el código de país (en el caso de España, el +34). Como puedes ver, otro compañero ya ha editado tus nodos añadiéndolo.

• El https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:street tiene que coincidir exactamente con el `name` de la calle/plaza, no con el `name:es` o cualquier otra clave. Es decir, en este caso debe ser "Plaça del Pare Fontova". Esto es muy importante; de lo contrario, las apps consumidoras no podrán interpolar a qué calle se refiere esa dirección.

• Si vas a añadir links de Instagram, es mejor ponerlos en la etiqueta más específica https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:instagram que en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website.

Por lo demás todo bien, y gracias por animarte a contribuir! Cualquier otra duda, no dudes en enviarme un mensaje.

Un saludo,
Diego
MuXeD Juanan (2026-02-09 15:53:23+00:00): Genial, gracias!

Lo tendré en cuenta para cambios en el futuro
dmlls (2026-02-09 23:23:24+00:00): Gracias a ti por actualizarlo!
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:32:15+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13521056381 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Software company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 05:04:46+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178435625
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
VLD0251 (2026-02-03 19:02:32+00:00): Hi! thanks for the edit. please remove name=ملعب, as it is a generic term on OpenStreetMap, names are reserved for specific proper nouns leisure=pitch already describes it
Happy Mapping!
user_8655426 (2026-02-03 11:36:14+00:00): こんにちは。OpenStreetMap (OSM) へようこそ！

この変更セットで「天城峠道路」を追加されましたが、この道路は現在 OSM で利用できる「背景画像」には写っていません。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1473788903

OSM は現在地上に存在する地物をマッピングするプロジェクトです。
・ようこそ！
https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome

「天城峠道路」は実際に存在する道路ですか？ 
また、全国各地に同様の道路を追加したり、既存の道路の線形を変えたりしていますが、source (情報源)が明示されていません。
それらの道路の編集のもととなった情報源(データソース)、道路情報の収集方法を教えて下さい、よろしくお願いします。
NeisBot (2026-02-03 07:36:10+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (8 changesets) shows that 341 of your last 341 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23778091
rarad74 (2026-02-03 07:41:46+00:00): Hi. Please in english at least. Here you are not in your country.
Thanks.
PS; And please, use Mapbox imagery. Bing are very old here.
one_electro_dan (2026-02-03 08:12:19+00:00): Ihave reverted this inappropriate changeset. The new user added irrelevant content and incorrect names, and did not provide an explanatory comment for the changeset in English, instead leaving an incomprehensible comment in Hindi.
L'imaginaire (2026-02-06 08:14:30+00:00): Het begin (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1473557101/) en einde (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1473557102) van dit pad zijn stukjes waarvoor aangegeven is dat het gebruik niet toegelaten is te voet. Daardoor zal de routering niet lukken.
George Sears (2026-02-06 20:24:40+00:00): city wall non È il muro esterno di un castello, come mai ti ostini ad aggiungere questo tag?
Taya_S (2026-02-12 12:42:34+00:00): Reverted data imported from Google

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178456174
jkoe (2026-02-18 20:51:41+00:00): Hallo Alex, danke für deine Beiträge in Kleinostheim. 

Zu diesem Changeset habe ich zwei kleine Fragen:

 * auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12618340522 hast du ein entrance=yes gesetzt, was meiner Meinung nach https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1809846990 dupliziert, was an der tatsächlichen Position des Eingangs und nicht des Vordachs ist. Ich würde vorschlagen, diese node wieder ohne tags zu machen, und dafür einen highway=footway noch bis zur Tür zu erstellen. In dem Kontext könnte ich auch noch die anderen beiden Türen auf Turmseite ans Wegenetz anschließen.

* https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1473796815 hast du einerseits mit name=* und access=private gemappt. Der Name erscheint mir eher eine Beschreibung zu sein. Ist das wirklich ein vor Ort ausgeschriebener oder anderweitig etablierter echter Name? Sonst würde ich zu operator=Hotel zum Schwanen für sinnvoller halten. Außerdem irritiert mich das access=private. Ich würde auf einem Hotelparkplatz eher ein access=customers (s https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access) erwarten, ggf. in Verbindung mit fee=yes. Ist das privat wirklich richtig?
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:28:55+00:00): Hello sadek4, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/13521150301

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178038721
Taya_S (2026-02-12 12:42:35+00:00): Reverted data imported from Google

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178456174
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:32:19+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13521133884 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Varicose Vein Clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
Dr Abhinav Kesarwani (2026-02-04 10:48:59+00:00): Varicose Veins Clinic - Dr Abhinav Kesarwani
kuhni74 (2026-02-03 17:03:00+00:00): Danke vielmals, die note war von mir, aus irgendeinem Grund hatte mich der Browser abgemeldet. Bist Du in der Lage, diesen "Gordischen Knoten" zu lösen? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5153344
gurglypipe (2026-02-03 11:26:38+00:00): Hiya, thanks for adding this. Is this a newly created nature reserve? I’ve not heard of it before (only stuff about planting and conservation in Ryelands Park). Where’s access to it from, is it off Austwick Road or Marshaw Road? Thanks :)
Toadpole (2026-02-03 12:16:26+00:00): Hi I'm working with Ryelands Primary to turn this patch of their land into a Nature Reserve for the school and the community.  Acess is from Marshaw Road or The school entrance on Ryelands Road. It's a work in progress but if you want to find out more email info@rewildingroots.org
gurglypipe (2026-02-03 13:58:04+00:00): That’s great! Thanks for adding it to the map.

I’ve tweaked the nature reserve tagging and added a bit more detail (woods, paths, some fences) from aerial imagery in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178052083.

It might take an hour or two for the view of the map to update.

If any of that isn’t right, or if there’s major stuff which has changed since the aerial imagery was taken, please say and it can be fixed.

In particular, if the reserve isn’t public access 24/7 (e.g. if it’s only open outside school hours or something) then please say and that can be tagged on the map.

I wasn’t sure where the access from Marshaw Road is, so have left it off the map for now.

Thanks :)
descubrebitcoin (2026-02-03 17:39:44+00:00): Hi, I have left it as disused and removed the tags because it seems to have been removed. I cannot find it anywhere in the operator's website or anywhere else.
Comino (2026-02-03 18:19:32+00:00): Thank you!
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:32:21+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13521231512 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Energy company office"

#MapWithoutSpam
RMEnergy OÜ (2026-02-04 08:01:27+00:00): Energy company office
Warin61 (2026-02-04 04:08:45+00:00): You have once again modified the boundary of the national park!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-12 23:21:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 178479265 where the changeset comment is: revert changes that pretend to be made with vespucci but aren't
eggie (2026-02-03 09:47:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Voor gemeentegroen wordt meestal natural=shrubbery gebruikt.
natural=wood zijn grote natuur bosgebieden.
Bos in Nederland wordt meestal getagd met landuse=forest. (productie) 

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Taya_S (2026-02-12 12:42:36+00:00): Reverted data imported from Google

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178456174
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:29:06+00:00): Hello sadek4, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/13521264401

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178041120
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:29:16+00:00): Hello sadek4, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/13521265901

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178041145
Taya_S (2026-02-12 12:42:37+00:00): Reverted data imported from Google

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178456174
frosm (2026-02-16 12:33:09+00:00): salut
je suppose que ce segment est aussi en zone maxspeed
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1093458495
eggie (2026-02-03 09:54:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Best lasttig in het begin. Ik zie nog een node met de tekst unfinished. Denk dat die weg kan.
Waar geen paden zijn, maar waar je nog witruimte ziet kun je inderdaad de landuse netjes laten aansluiten. 
Paden die aan het dichtgroeien zijn taggen we eerst als disused:highway=path
Dat voorkomt opnieuw intekenen. Je ziet de paden dan niet meer renderen op de kaart en routeren doen ze dan ook niet meer. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=178041615
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-03 09:57:04+00:00): Landuse kun je het beste bewerken met editor JOSM. Die heeft een betere validator. 
Ik zie nog wel landuse overlap.

editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047


Mapse
eggie
Warin61 (2026-02-04 05:28:21+00:00): Brisbane Water National Park boundary again set back to correct location.
eggie (2026-02-03 10:00:07+00:00): Nog even de tip om paden niet direct te verwijderen, maar eerst disused:highway=path te gebruiken. Het voorkomt opnieuw intekenen. Na verloop van tijd kun je ze dan definitief verwijderen.
Groet,
eggie
eggie (2026-02-03 13:42:50+00:00): De tag is niet highway=disused.. Dat is niet valide. maar disused:highway= track.  Of path.
jSeke (2026-02-03 12:52:20+00:00): Gaelic first in Cille Mhoire - Kilmuir.
Wish_F (2026-03-26 10:07:15+00:00): Your edits seem to be based on rather old aerial imagery.
The features you removed had check_date tags that I added to indicate the date when I last confirmed them on site.
It looks like you may have traced older imagery, whereas my edits are based on local knowledge and a recent field survey.
Sorry, but I will revert these changes.