piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Peter Elderson (2023-05-01 07:23:38+00:00): Ik ge wel eens iets te voortvarend te werk, ekskuus daarvoor! Ik ben er nit zelf geweest maar kijk wel met viewers hoe het eruitziet; luchtfoto's zijn meestal niet voldoende, zeker niet als er bomen staan. Ik kijk nu nog wat beter, vanaf verschillende kanten. Voor mij zou dit nog steeds onder een tuin kunnen vallen, maar leisure=park kan ook. Een park hoeft niet groot te zijn, zegt de wiki. Alleen gras taggen, hm... met zulke bomen erop? 
In ieder geval is het geen village_green, want dat betekent niet gemeentegroen maar een specifiek deel van een dorp, eigenlijk alleen een Engels begrip maar in Nederland valt een brink of een meent er wel onder. Vaak heet het dan ook Brink of Meent. Dat is dit zeker niet. 
Ik heb niet genoeg informatie om de losse bomen erop te zetten.
FraukeLeo (2023-08-12 18:40:19+00:00): Hallo LightSpirit, ich habe die Kreiselanschlüsse mal überarbeitet. Erstens gibt es keinen Grund dafür, die Äste einer aufgeteilten durchgehenden Bundesstraße in primary_links umzutaggen – das sind nach wie vor primarys. links sind Zubringer oder kurze Verbindungsstücke zwischen zwei Straßen, z.B. hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28876442 Zweitens weiß ich nicht, was diese Doppelknicke an den Aufteilungen sollen, die überhaupt nicht da sind. Die Fahrbahn geht einfach in einer weiten Kurve weiter und kann doch auch so gemappt werden. Drittens beginnt die bauliche Trennung des Anschlusses nach Nastätten schon kurz hinter der Brücke, die hab ich entsprechend rausgezogen. Die war auch mal da :)
LightSpirit (2023-08-14 23:00:46+00:00): Ja, alles klar. Hatte vor ein paar Monaten in diesem Bereich die Fluren mal vervollständigt.

Gruß
Oliver (LightSpirit)
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-20 19:40:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8777435308
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149652114

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Supaplex (2023-04-21 02:22:54+00:00): I think there is no place called "Zhuro Tang" in the Southern point of Taiwan. If it is not real, it will be removed after verified.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135165962
Supaplex (2023-04-21 02:23:05+00:00): I think there is no place called "Zhuro Tang" in the Southern point of Taiwan. If it is not real, it will be removed after verified.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135166020
skyper (2023-04-21 02:50:11+00:00): Hi,
again, all `roof:shape` values have a capital first letter.
What does `SOURCE_COD` stand for?
Are you sure that the values for `height` are correct? I wonder how you measured them up to 10e-8 meters.
Regards,
skyper
M-NCPPC_Import (2023-04-21 09:58:34+00:00): Hi, 

Thanks for the input, will fix, and address in future uploads. After addressing waiver. 


Thanks
skyper (2023-04-27 13:22:16+00:00): Hello,
despite your comment, you did not fix your workflow but you continue with this broken import with wrong values for `roof:shape` and strange values of height.
In fact you, did not even fix the objects of this changeset and did not answer my questions about `SOURCE_COD` and the origin of `height`.

Please, stop immediately and describe and discuss your workflow.

Greetings from a rather disappointed,
skyper
Supaplex (2023-04-21 02:23:15+00:00): I think there is no place called "Zhuro Tang" in the Southern point of Taiwan. If it is not real, it will be removed after verified.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135166116
Frans S (2023-05-14 09:26:13+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped.  However, be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135166478
ZLima12 (2025-11-08 08:42:47+00:00): Hi,

Looks like you created this node which doesn't look quite right: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10827927927

Were you getting this data from some other source?
clay_c (2025-11-09 17:33:30+00:00): That's funky. Looks like I accidentally copied this node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10829980841

Deleted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174428313
APneunzehn74 (2023-07-18 18:35:06+00:00): Hallo, vor Ort kann ich bei 48,7978252, 13,1527805 keine Quelle entdecken.
Grüße APneunzehn74
APneunzehn74 (2023-07-18 18:43:58+00:00): Auch hier nur 48.79339° N, 13.13707° E vor Ort kein Hinweis auf eine Quelle.
IIVQ (2023-07-14 08:37:34+00:00): Hi La_voie_de_la_Raison,

As per the discussion in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/railway-superroutes/99110/35 I would like you to remove this pseudo-route (and other sections of the rhine-alpine corridor) as well.
stevea (2023-07-15 23:38:02+00:00): It is well-established that OSM creates neither components of nor any whole of the Trans-European Transport Network (a "combined road-rail planning network").  Please remove these (again, as you have done before and acknowledged were wrong in that thread).  Do not enter additional components of this / these.
AurélienQ (2023-07-24 05:55:30+00:00): There are no problems for me to delet this relation, but I don't want to do it by myself.
stevea (2023-07-25 05:22:01+00:00): Well, then ask for help specifically here.  Say "I cannot do it myself" not "I don't want to do it by myself."  Unless you are a child, and if so, say so, and we will do it for you.  And, don't do this again.

Otherwise, remove it yourself.
IIVQ (2023-07-25 10:52:42+00:00): I removed them.
AurélienQ (2023-07-31 10:31:14+00:00): @stevea, don’t say that because I’m under 18, I’m a child, so I "don’t know how to do it". 
I don’t like your judgment. I can use revert.osmz.ru or JOSM perfectly to review changesets.
And if I wrote "I don’t want to do it," it’s because I don’t want to do it, not because I can’t.
Without any pretence, I think many OSM contributors are more childish in their head than I am.
Besides, I don’t like your judgment on one thing that you think is a mistake, when I have thousands of good contributions.
stevea (2023-07-31 16:40:20+00:00): When you repeatedly make the same mistake (after being told it is a mistake, and agreeing with us — the wider community —  that it was a mistake, and then correcting your mistake), you deserve some judgment, even judgement which gets increasingly harsh.

OSM is a serious project, with serious data and serious people who want to maintain high quality in our data.  Sometimes (as here) we must pass judgement when we see that others are "polluting" our map with bad data.  Such judgement is not deserved for a "first mistake."  (And you received only courtesy when this happened the first time).  But when such a large mistake is repeated, the OSM community can, should and will judge such action as hostile to our mapping practices.

Especially when it is rebuffed with "but I don't want to delete it myself."  That truly does appear like childish behavior (so it appears I guessed correctly that you are "under 18").  When either adults or children repeatedly add bad data to the map (in similar fashion to how they have done so recently, knowing it was wrong), such behavior will be rebuffed by the OSM community — with (sometimes harsh) judgment.  If you don't like being treated like a child when acting childish, perhaps you should find another project to participate in.  Otherwise, you will discover that thinking you do not deserve judgement will continue to surprise you, because you do deserve judgement.

It's fairly easy to follow our community guidelines, especially after you have been repeatedly told.  Do so, without entering bad data, and you will receive no judgment.  In fact, I frequently offer accolades and congratulations to (especially newer) mappers who map well — right here in changeset comments!  On the flip-side, when there are errors, and especially repeated errors, you are going to hear about it.  If you consider that "judgment," that's because it is, and again, it is deserved.
AurélienQ (2023-07-31 17:15:13+00:00): Regarding my age, I have no doubt that you went on my profile, as it is indicated. Lying about the fact that you would have "guessed" my old man, does not put you in any position to teach a lesson. 
In addition, I would like you to check your sources: look at the last date of publication of these changes that you do not approve and the date of the first remark made to me on this subject, you would observe that I have taken this remark into account. 
Finally, I would point out that I never deviated from the rules of OSM. 
The information I have entered, contrary to what you imply, is sourced, reliable, and useful. 
If I do not want to cancel my changes, it is not for nothing, and it is indeed a service that I ask someone. Others indeed agree with me that it is difficult to remove many modifications made by oneself and sense no evil intent, but which were made just because there is a blur in the osm rules. 

Therefore, I am not guilty of anything, nor to blame, nor to judge. Nothing gives you the right to threaten me.

I am not trying to create tensions, just to explain myself, and to remind you that value does not affect age.

PS: English is not my mother tongue, so there may be some translation errors in my message.
De plus, j'aimerais que vous vérifiez vos sources : regardez la dernière date d'édition de ces changements que vous n'approuvez pas et la date de la première remarque qui m'a été faite à ce sujet, vous observeriez que j'ai tenu compte de cette remarque. 
Enfin, je vous ferais remarquer que jamais je me suis écarté des rêgles d'OSM. 
Les informations que j'ai rentrés, contrairement à ce que vous insinuez, sont sourcées, fiables, et utiles. 
Si je n'ai pas envie d'annuler mes changements, ce n'est pas pour rien, et c'est donc en effet un service que je demande à quelqu'un. D'autres sont en effet d'accord avec moi pour dire qu'il est difficile de supprimer des nombreuses modification effectuée par soi même et sens aucune intention mauvaise, mais qui ont été faite juste parce qu'il y a un flou dans les rêgles d'osm. 

Je ne suis donc, ni coupable de quoi que ce soit, ni à blâmer, ni à juger. Rien ne vous donne le droit de me menacer.

Je ne cherche pas à créer de tensions, juste à m'expliquer, et à vous rappeler que la valeur n'attent pas l'âge.

PS: l'anglais n'est pas ma langue maternelle et il est donc possible qu'il y ai des erreurs de traductions dans mon message.
stevea (2023-07-31 17:22:44+00:00): You would be incorrect that I checked your profile to determine your age; I did not.  I simply guessed (by your behavior, the "but I don't want to do it by myself" sounded childish, so I guessed correctly).

Let's tone down what shouldn't be aggressive nor angry.  I am not trying to create tensions, either.  I most certainly have not threatened you, nor do I mean to do so.

If you find it "difficult to remove what you have added to the map," that is a problem.  It actually does mean that you should not be adding things to the map in the first place (if you are unable or unwilling to remove them, especially if they are in error, and very especially if they are the same type of error data which you have entered before as an error, then you did it again).

Your error data have been removed by another OSM volunteer (IIVQ).  Please:  do not add more "rail data" to OSM.
AurélienQ (2023-07-31 18:38:38+00:00): I want to clarify that since this error, as soon as I am in a blur of OSM, I ask on the forum OSM-France the opinion of everyone.

Similarly, removing a lot of work that takes several hours and is well-intentioned gives the impression that everything we do is useless. Although that is not the case. 
I am not the only one to have this feeling, I was able to see it through this same forum. Besides, it was not at all young people who had this feeling, some are even members of the board of directors of OSM-France. (so you guessed correctly, but by chance 😉)
What I meant by "I don’t want to do it" is that I prefer that someone else "destroy" my work, but that if some people think it’s better for me to do it, I would do it without difficulty.

I am glad that this discussion ends calmly, because this is sometimes not the case behind a screen.

Have a great week
stevea (2023-07-31 18:58:24+00:00): Thank you for your additional comments.  I am glad we found some common ground, that the incorrect data have been removed, and that this sort of error will not happen again (by you adding rail data which OSM agrees should not be in our map).

There are some kinds of rail data we do add to our map and some kinds of rail data (like the kind you entered) which we do not add to our map.  Thank you for observing and respecting that distinction.
Endres Pelka (2024-02-13 13:47:13+00:00): Jakiś trójkątny budyneczek narysowany na istniejącym, numery telefonów w tagu description zamiast phone, addr:housenumber niezgodny z niczym wokół, Google w tagu source! Posprzątałem w 147409989.
Hufkratzer (2023-04-20 23:55:07+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164271583 looks more like a riding arena (jumping arena) than like a riding centre. The wiki recommends to tag riding arenas leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian. Compare
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding
Frans S (2023-04-23 09:52:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
However, 50 % is not fair squared.
Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key

Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135168403
aixbrick (2023-04-21 06:28:54+00:00): Hallo,
bitte berücksichtige bei den Anpassungen, dass die Gebäude nach ALKIS lagegenau gemappt wurden.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193098070, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193098186/ und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193097922/ stimmen damit nun nicht mehr überein, obwohl die von dir ausgesparten Teile (Link #1 und #2) sogar auf dem Luftbild erkennbar sind.
Das NRW ALKIS steht übrigens als Layer in JOSM zur Verfügung. Bitte nutzen. Nach Luftbild sollte nur noch gemappt werden, wenn es deutliche Abweichungen zu ALKIS gibt und das Luftbild definitiv aktueller ist.
Zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164276438 noch die Anmerkung, dass Grundstückszufahrten i.d.R. keinen Namen haben.
Gruß
aixbrick (2023-04-28 15:32:22+00:00): Korrigiert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135474538.
adrianojbr (2023-04-28 14:47:02+00:00): Olá, Trooper57!

Sobre a nota na loja de motos (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164276673/):

 "A loja se chama Brustintas porque eles também vendem tintas além das motos. Não sei como adicionar isso, ele não deixa colocar dois 'shop='".

As tintas vendidas são para pintura de motos ou pintura em geral?

Para o primeiro caso, deve-se procurar uma etiqueta acessória, tal como motorcycle:paints=yes, que não tem nenhum uso ainda (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=motorcycle%3Apaints%3D*#tags).

Para o segundo caso, o melhor é separar em dois pontos diferentes.
Assim, ficaria a área representando o edifício com as tags comuns (endereço, por exemplo), um ponto dentro da área do edifício para loja de motos e outro ponto para a loja de tintas, conforme https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator.

Abraço!
user_5359 (2023-04-23 08:47:03+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1u7o. Please use wheelchair instead of Wheelchair.  I currently have no tools to quickly correct this error.
1993matias (2023-04-23 10:25:54+00:00): Is it case sensitive? I did not know, sorry - I will fix it
LucGommans (2024-05-12 00:30:43+00:00): I just noticed you undid my change and re-tagged the whole square as a parking area again, but this is not correct.

Please be aware when playing maproulette that the aerial view is not always up-to-date. I would especially ask to double check when the object you're changing comes from a recent changeset tagged as source=survey

---

Mij viel net op dat je mijn wijziging ongedaan gemaakt hebt en het hele plein als parkeervak aangemerkt hebt, wat niet klopt.

Let s.v.p. bij het spelen van maproulette op dat de luchtfoto's niet altijd up-to-date zijn. Ik zou vooral willen vragen om te dubbel-checken wanneer je een object wijzigt dat van een recente changeset komt die met source=survey getagged is
MxxCon (2023-04-25 02:55:07+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate what were you drying to map with that small 1-story building?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135169371
Frans S (2023-04-22 11:01:10+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Map more accurate !
* Quality prevails over quantity!!

A: * Multiple buildings has been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
E: Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* When buildings have protruding elements, they should be included into your mappings.
D: Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135169417
ivanbranco (2023-04-21 09:36:58+00:00): Ciao Silvano,

perché elimini e ridisegni gli edifici invece di spostarli e modificarli? Così facendo si perde tutta la storia dell'elemento: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Hai inoltre eliminato edifici taggati come building=house/detached per sostituirli con un piu' generico building=yes, come mai?
Silvano Turati (2023-04-21 17:12:44+00:00): Ciao, sono relativamente nuovo e trovo che a spostarli e modificarli ci vuole più tempo che a ridisegnarli da nuovo. Cosa faccio di sbagliato mettendo il tag "Edificio"?
Silvano Turati (2023-04-21 22:02:29+00:00): Ciao, se puoi dai un'occhiata al mio ultimo gruppo di modifiche e dimmi se va meglio, grazie.
ivanbranco (2023-04-22 08:17:51+00:00): ___Ciao, sono relativamente nuovo e trovo che a spostarli e modificarli ci vuole più tempo che a ridisegnarli da nuovo.___

Se può aiutarti, se dopo aver selezionato un edificio clicchi "M" sulla tastiera puoi muoverlo subito.

___Cosa faccio di sbagliato mettendo il tag "Edificio"?___

Questo preset aggiunge il valore building=yes. Significa che hai aggiunto un edificio ma non sai qual è il suo scopo principale (se è un edificio commerciale, di vendita al dettaglio, uno sgabuzzino, una tettoia, una casa, delle villette a schiera ecc.). Quindi è solo un valore generico che va dettagliato maggiormente con valori piu' precisi.

In questo caso tu hai sostituito degli edifici il cui scopo era valorizzato, tipo building=house (vuol dire che qualcuno aveva verificato si trattasse di una casa monofamiliare) o building=detached (una casa monofamiliare indipendente) con un generico building=yes, comportando una perdita di dettaglio.
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-04-21 10:01:36+00:00): Moin niklasliebig,

Du erwähnst in Deinem Kommentar einen "Ilexpark". Ist hier ein Park, der so heißt? Der würde dann noch in OSM fehlen.

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-20 21:48:50+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 134767768, 134954330, 135147395.
user_5359 (2023-04-21 05:06:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! A name doesn‘t describe a business. For example: Bob‘s Auto Repair has no shop=car_repair.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-20 22:09:09+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 135151398, 135154415, 135154700.
gscholz (2023-05-18 08:01:03+00:00): Hi Cnidaria,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of "Unión":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-67.73617&lat=-53.76966&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=135170751

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-05-18 08:10:41+00:00): ... and the relation "Policial" as well.
Cnidaria (2023-05-18 21:17:16+00:00): Hello gscholz,
The boundary relations have been repaired.
Thanks! Happy Mapping!
BCNorwich (2023-04-22 06:51:33+00:00): Hi, a duplicated node at end of the hedge was removed. You are making quite a few of these.

Bernard
Glitch-Hunter (2023-05-18 10:27:54+00:00): das ist nicht ganz richtig das ist ehmaliges Sperrgebiet, betreten ist nicht verboten
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=374744314181402
DeFra85 (2023-05-18 11:54:17+00:00): Die anderen Zuwege entlang Schwarzer Weg sind sogar mit Baumschnitt blockiert. Zudem wurde der Hermannsweg umverlegt (auf Asphalt, was gar überhaupt nicht gern gemacht wird, da es die Prämium-Auszeichnung gefährdet).
Und als letztens da war wurde ordentlich rumgeballert... und das war kein Maschinengewehr.

Man könnte über einen access:conditional= nachdenken
Kovoschiz (2023-04-21 06:13:58+00:00): You should keep the container stacking areas as `highway=service` + `area=yes` or something.
Kovoschiz (2023-04-21 06:14:33+00:00): Besides you haven't added back the roads between containers.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-21 07:25:23+00:00): no roads were removed.
silversurfer83 (2023-04-21 07:27:05+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap :)

thank you for contributing data to the OSM database using maps.me

It does look like the hotel in Talinn you added can already be found in the database. This leads me to believe that this addition of yours might have been unintentional. A lot of users think that the "add place to map" feature can be used as a personal note feature. What it really does is add the POIs to the OSM-database which is used by millions like you around the world. 

If you really want to add data, please make sure it's not already there.
If you need to save your personal favorite spots, try and find the correct feature in the app. Thank you :)

Any questions?
Just comment using the link in this email

cheers
silversurfer83