piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kidneyspr (2025-04-27 20:10:51+00:00): En ningún letrero dice "Federico", y por eso se lo había quitado en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150325959. Si este es el nombre oficial de la avenida, por favor muestra la evidencia.

Si lo que deseas es especificar el origen del nombre de la avenida, pues para eso está https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:etymology. Acabo de usarlo en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165521138 para identificar al prócer.
gscholz (2026-01-06 09:37:16+00:00): Hi Hydrel,
your edits have left behind a lot of errors regarding wrongly edited relations: 

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-1.58936&lat=43.43689&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Obviously you misinterpreted the meaning of the "inner" and "outer" roles.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Allison P (2025-04-27 05:37:43+00:00): It connects to primary; doesn't that make it primary?
Joseph R P (2025-04-27 14:30:36+00:00): Technically it wouldn't since it only connects to another primary (or greater classification) road at one end and a secondary at the other, making it an inaccessible stub in the realm of road classification. If Main Street/Fairview were primary too, this little segment of Chinden should be primary since it'd connect the two routes.
Allison P (2025-04-30 03:02:48+00:00): I see. I wasn't understanding what you meant by stub.
afgb1977 (2025-04-29 01:50:16+00:00): Hola María Elisa, bienvenida a OpenStreetMap.
Exactamente qué es lo que hiciste con este CS? 
Que es lo que tratas de representar?
afgb1977 (2025-04-29 01:57:46+00:00): El etiquetado de la versión anterior era el correcto ya que es una zona residencial, no comercial.
Porque building=comercial? Y que significa "universidade teste"? 
OSM es una base de datos sería y tratamos en lo posible de agregar datos reales, no es una zona de juegos o para testear sua capacidades. Para esto existe un sitio alterno de osm donde puedes testear y probar sin afectar la base de datos real.
Voy a hacer una reversión a tu CS ya que cambiaste un etiquetado que se ajusta a la realidad del terreno por uno que no concuerda en absoluto.
Recuerda leer las pautas de la comunidad OpenStreetMap para mapear y evitar dañar o modificar erróneamente los datos.
OneStaticIP (2025-04-27 03:59:20+00:00): Accidentally uploaded without notes:
Source: Esri World Imagery
TheLNL (2025-06-20 18:51:54+00:00): Why in specific is this bench the "scary one", do you remember and specific details ?
TheLNL (2025-06-20 18:52:40+00:00): *any not and
adnaaniii (2025-06-21 05:27:20+00:00): Half of it's legs are not on the track which makes the bench tilted towards the swamp/lake and its thrilling/adventurous sitting on it haha
monhiko (2025-04-27 07:08:23+00:00): 你好！请问是新来的mapper吗？

在标注政府用地时请注意将标签内的“building=yes”删去，将用地范围标注为建筑是不对的哦！同时，军事等敏感地区还请不要在地图上标注！

另外，绘图时请尽量参考附近（或省市区内）优秀地域案例，可以帮你绘图更加规范哦！ > _ <
kubahahaha (2025-04-30 22:06:54+00:00): Google Street View nie może być źródłem do zmian na OSM - licencja nie pozwala
Kacper Janicki (2025-05-01 05:48:56+00:00): Spoko, nie wiedziałem. Po prostu miałem kiedyś tam przejeżdżałem busem i musiałem zawracać, bo bym nie przeszedł. Upewniałem się tylko na streetview czy znak jest dalej ten sam, bo dawno tam nie byłem.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-30 10:29:33+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12791050022/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
smsm1 (2025-07-30 11:42:38+00:00): Based on the fix me type, It's a station help point. An interface with speak, microphone and two buttons. One button is for emergency assistance, the other for information. You can get through to a human for help. It's not a general phone. Most stations in the UK have them.

Looking at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wik/Railway_stations amenity=telephone is the closest however it's not a general telephone and doesn't look like a telephone but can be used like one but to only the train company and emergency services.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-04 07:47:33+00:00): maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:information%3Dterminal ?
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-12 20:44:58+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166172712
rempshaener (2025-04-27 07:38:24+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.

water_source: bei OSM werden grundsätzlich englische Standardvalues verwendet, daher bitte „main“ statt „wasserleitung“ verwenden.

Bei den Kupplungen wird zwischen Anzahl und Größe getrennt. In diesem Fall wäre das dann
couplings=2
couplings:diameters=B;B

Bei Fragen bitte melden. Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag.
Viele Grüße
map per (2025-05-01 17:25:12+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
Nielkrokodil (2025-05-12 18:35:06+00:00): Achtung, hier hast du die Reihenfolge der Wege der Relation REX4 Wien - Krems zerstört. Was wolltest du denn hier machen? Der Änderungssatz-Kommentar ist nicht eindeutig. Wolltest du vielleicht nur die Fahrtrichtung Wien - Krems ändern?
Nielkrokodil (2025-05-12 18:35:53+00:00): Jetzt habe ich 2x Wien-Krems geschrieben. Zerstört ist die Relation Krems - Wien.
DerKaiserschmarren (2025-05-13 07:19:52+00:00): Eigentlich die Relation bis zur eigentlichen Halteposition bringen. Falls das aber etwas zerstört hat, können wir es gerne rückgängig machen.
user_5359 (2025-10-03 13:39:19+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/9965573725. What is the mean of the tag zcs = 5?
Martinligabue (2025-10-09 19:58:49+00:00): it was imported badly by Embarto, they already made bad imports in the past, here I just merged the two features without checking for the validity of the data. I have no idea what the meaning might be...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12790523815/history
Filip009 (2025-05-05 12:09:32+00:00): Zdravím, pre reláciu ulice sa používa relácia typu street. Relácia, ktorú ste použil sa používa na združenie liniek verejnej dopravy.
Správce (2025-05-05 17:06:51+00:00): Děkuji za upozornění, již jsem chybu opravil.
JulesGabrielVerne (2026-04-21 11:21:13+00:00): dlaczego linie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1381603622 oznaczyłeś jako most? przexież to zwykły chodnik
grzegorz75jan (2026-04-21 13:31:52+00:00): Od razu usuwaj takie cuda. Ten Map_Rivers lubi stosować swoją radosną twórczość. Popatrz na jego profil i poczytaj komentarze do zmian.
grzegorz75jan (2026-04-21 13:47:38+00:00): Kawałek dalej na północ też dodał mosty. Zarówno tu jak i tam może i miał trochę racji (nie widzę dobrze bo słabe orto) ale w pierwszym przypadku tam jest rów lub jakaś rzeczka ale tam jeśli już to jest tylko przepust i prawdopodobnie na północy też tylko większe.
Długość tych "mostów" jest oderwana od rzeczywistości. 
W okolicy brak obrysów nowych budynków. Drogi polne prowadzące do zabudowań.
Glassman (2025-04-27 16:39:55+00:00): It appears you removed some of the crossings:markings tags. Was this on purpose or an accident?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165492965
user_22465256 (2025-04-27 16:52:53+00:00): I believe this was related to railroad crossings? The tags were by there lonesome on a node that didn’t cross. I moved them to the appropriate crossing node as required by OSM wiki. I followed the wiki specifics that said they were required to be on the crossing. Hopefully that helps?
Glassman (2025-04-28 02:25:43+00:00): Help me understand why you replaced crossing=marked with crossing=traffic_signals? It is wrong. Unless you can convenience me that your change is correct, my only real alternative is to revert all of your changeset that made this change. I do see come good additions, but changing the crossing tag is just wrong.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165492965
Glassman (2025-04-28 02:42:13+00:00): Check out the wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing%3Dtraffic_signals.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165492965
user_22465256 (2025-04-28 04:25:01+00:00): I so wish I could talk to you via voice as this is a big one I’ve been interested in for years now. That wiki Is exactly what I used. So here’s my thoughts… 
All pedestrian push button crossings in the USA follow this and the reason for marking this is two-fold. So pushing the button tells the light to change. The navigation apps know that when a traffic signal for vehicles is next to a traffic signal for pedestrians that it only treats them as one signal when driving. The crossing node is marked as well as the pedestrian crossing itself just as mentioned in the wiki. Now why would we do this? Timing for pedestrians is seen by the length and type of crossing; timing for vehicles is seen as how many and what type of crossings there are (which is only seen by nodes, they don’t see the line of the crossing.) The pedestrian timing is actually longer when a signal is used instead of a marked crossing as average wait time to cross is increased by a minute for every crossing. It doesn’t matter if the crossing is marked or unmarked at this point. The light has changed and all traffic stops. Typically these signals also include the sound and vibration items mentioned on the wiki page. Also on this page the very first “How to map” states to use this tag for crossings, “regulated with light signals,” which seems to imply to me that this is the primary choice that the wiki editors are recommending to use when there’s a question as to which type of crossings picked. 

The vehicles only see the node of the crossing and never the crossing itself. The signaled crossings also increase travel time by vehicles so the node must be marked and not just the crossing line itself. 

I don’t know if I’ve made a good enough argument but I hope it’s at least good food for thought and I totally appreciate your opinions!
user_22465256 (2025-04-28 04:37:30+00:00): Oops, I said one minute for each crossing but I can’t remember the exact time. It’s somewhere in my notes but I don’t have it accessible now. There might be an example posted in this beast of an article: https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/26518/chapter/8#96
user_22465256 (2025-04-28 12:28:19+00:00): Also if I was wrong (I’m thinking now maybe I was as I look more at the other wiki pages), I will gladly go around and fix this. I’m not alone on this error and this error existed already in some crossings here. WOW, if this is what I’m now thinking it is, then I’ve never seen a signaled crossing correctly tagged across years of editing… I’m glad to know I’m not alone in this goof… the wiki page needs an image to clarify. Both this page and the general signal page. Of course the reasons I stated above hold but if that’s wrong it doesn’t matter. If I’m wrong I’ll immediately go to fix all these as they’re super easy to find and I’ve got sooo many others to fix that I’ve seen across the country.
user_22465256 (2025-04-28 13:16:47+00:00): Okay based on this page now I don’t think I was wrong… but I do think OSM needs to clarify what the correct answer is:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing
user_22465256 (2025-04-29 01:44:02+00:00): Here’s another page that seems (?) to say what I did is okay (at least not wrong): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing
Glassman (2025-05-02 19:56:10+00:00): After reviewing what you posted, I have to agree with you that what you did was correct. I do think that the the tag crossing:markings=* should be added as suggested by the wiki page you referenced. 

I'm going to update the crossings as I have time. Feel free to jump in. And in the future, please including the crossing:markings tag as well.  Thanks
user_22465256 (2025-05-03 00:48:44+00:00): Awesome! I updated a bunch of crossings as recommended. I also keep finding crossings that aren’t attached and crossing nodes that aren’t at the crossing. So I’m fixing those too. There are some map helping aids that will help find those but I’m not currently using those. I get distracted in my edits go on tangents but hopefully the end product is quality.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-26 08:46:48+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173783828
aharvey (2025-04-28 00:43:04+00:00): This seems highly suspicious, how are these residences accessed by vehicle otherwise?
SomeoneElse (2025-04-27 12:54:21+00:00): Hello, a quick question about the Rob Roy Way:
There's a bit of a gap currently at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/189465#map=18/56.527225/-4.111209 .  Do you know if that's deliberate (maybe the bridge can't be used for some reason) or accidental and just needs joining up?
Best Regards,
Andy
JamJar II (2025-04-27 16:45:37+00:00): Hi Andy,

Looks like, after splitting that section to allow the braid, I missed the re-adding. I will fix that now!

Thanks for spotting!

James
JamJar II (2025-04-27 16:51:45+00:00): Ok, should be fixed now at Ardtalnaig. Let me know if I have missed anything else.
StC (2025-06-28 14:35:00+00:00): Bonjour,

sauf erreur de ma part ce changeset a créé un "trou" dans le Tour d'Oisans et des Ecrins, qui si je comprends bien correspond à un éboulement. Est-ce que l'itinéraire n'aurait pas été re-routé de l'autre côté de la vallée ?
Floups (2025-06-29 13:22:17+00:00): Non pas de reroutage par contre des travaux ont été fait et je mets la carte à jour tout de suite avec les nouvelles modifications
StC (2025-06-30 08:51:59+00:00): Super, merci !
wyk (2025-04-28 06:26:43+00:00): Weshalb löschst Du den Namen von RouteMaster und Routen?
JeroenHoek (2025-04-27 09:42:14+00:00): Kun je verklaren waarom 0080100011122924 weer terugkeert? Die heb ik verwijderd en teruggemeld, en in de BAG staat hij sinds 14 april op gesloopt.

Pakt de BAG plugin oude data?
JeroenHoek (2025-04-27 09:42:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1381609483
CartoKees (2025-04-27 14:31:22+00:00): Ik had nog wel een visuele check gedaan met een luchtfoto erbij, maar deze is er tussendoor geglipt. Gebouw weer weggehaald.
Vanuit JOSM haalt de plug in de gegevens op bij de BAG. Dat is dus op dit moment. Vanaf de website https://bag.tools4osm.nl/ is een download te maken van een hele provincie. Dat zijn BAG gegevens van begin van de maand.
Ik maak veel gebruik van de website. Dat gaat over het algemeen goed.
JeroenHoek (2025-04-27 14:52:15+00:00): Dit was dus inderdaad oude data? Anders zit er namelijk een bug in de plugin.
nevw (2025-04-27 12:03:39+00:00): Hi, large residential areas have been deleted in this changeset.
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=165494943
Is this intended?
fortera_au (2025-04-28 08:55:02+00:00): There's also a set of overlapping buildings, looks like it might have been an attempt at using one of the building plugins that didn't quite work as intended.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165494943
TwoDads (2025-04-29 09:46:37+00:00): Removing residential areas was intentional. I plan to reapply without pinning to roads and natural areas as per the wiki guidelines. The issue with the overlapping buildings appear to be arising from the fact that the ‘club’ encompasses the whole lot. I tried to include buildings within the club but had issues. Still finding my way around JOSM. I’ll fix both issues shortly.
nevw (2025-04-29 10:25:10+00:00): Thanks for letting us know. Josm will reward your efforts many times over.
literan (2025-04-27 11:15:55+00:00): корректный тег для нерегулируемого перехода - crossing=uncontrolled

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6486666674/history

прочитайте внимательно вики https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:crossing

верну обратно
cybermapper (2025-04-27 11:21:03+00:00): спасибо!
siby47 (2025-05-02 08:12:15+00:00): Good day,
I corrected the elevations of Groot Paresis North and Groot Paresis South back to elevation from sources: Topograpgical map 1:50K 2016AD and trigonometrical beacons T034 and T045.
I think your given source "Namibia Tourist Map" might have an error there.
See also:https://namibia-topo.openstreetmap.org.za/#zoom=13&lat=-22.73361&lon=17.03556
siby47 (2025-05-02 08:13:03+00:00): sorry, T034 and T035
kamasytrix (2025-04-27 08:56:17+00:00): Там для Полтави добавили оновлені супутникові знімки Esri World Imagery. Зручніше буде редагувати
SPEC1AL1ST (2025-04-27 09:00:34+00:00): Дякую, наче трохи вони чіткіші, але й сильної різниці немає) Чи вони новіші?
SPEC1AL1ST (2025-04-27 09:03:36+00:00): Так, бачу, нові будинки є. Дякую :)
gurglypipe (2025-04-27 14:22:28+00:00): Should this be cables=6 also? It was cables=6 until https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165495984, which I think introduced an error due to not splitting the way near Hutton.
gurglypipe (2025-04-28 23:41:22+00:00): I’ve changed it back to cables=6 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165568965, since you didn’t reply. Let me know if I’ve made an incorrect assumption. Ta
Arlo James Barnes (2025-05-10 02:58:39+00:00): Thanks, the `bare_rock` is helpful when reading https://nature.com/articles/s41598-021-01451-8
Supaplex (2025-04-28 01:26:55+00:00): Hi Dino

Can you explain why do you add empty nodes in the middle of the ocean?
Supaplex (2025-04-28 04:14:50+00:00): Xin chào Dino

Bạn có thể giải thích tại sao bạn lại thêm các nút rỗng vào giữa đại dương không?
user_5359 (2025-04-29 13:23:33+00:00): Hello! Please notice the standard key for the colour of a roof ist roof:colour instead of colour:roof. I've already made the change.
DD1GJ (2025-04-27 15:23:18+00:00): Revert, war bereits (etwas fehlerhaft) vorhanden.

Hallo Mauli1208,

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und danke für das Entdecken des Fehlers. Der Staudamm ist bereits Bestandteil des Wanderwegenetzes. Vor ein paar Jahren hatte allerdings jemand aus Versehen das highway-tag entfernt. Ich habe daher Deine Neueintragung  und den alten Fehler rückgängig gemacht.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30193389

Wie alles bei OSM funktioniert, erfährst Du unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Falls Dich das Wanderwegenetz interessiert: https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=4128524&type=relation&map=17.0/47.9276/8.3729

Viele Grüße, Joachim
Pikse (2026-05-24 08:39:00+00:00): relation/3157885 – this object is for landuse, it has no name. Name "Lüübnitsa" that you added stands for the whole village/hamlet (relation/354675), including the dispersed settlement around, not only this more compact residential area.
fedoroff net (2026-05-24 13:22:44+00:00): I understand the local logic of the names. But you also need to take into account the difficult search for the name of a locality or part of it, if you apply it over a swamp or forest. I suggest we make two names. One above the residential area, the other on the administrative area.
Pikse (2026-05-24 15:38:13+00:00): There actually already were two objects with village name, the other one being node/1973428366 at the village centre. This can be searched for, too.

Landuse carrying this name on the other hand is misleading, as this is simply the wrong area.

Note that we use "administrative" tag in lack of better alternatives though the settlements in Estonia actually aren't administrative entities. This "administrative" area is the only definite/verifiable way how this village is actually delimited.
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-04-28 14:38:30+00:00): Moin Till_btn,

wo findet man diese Daten? Ich stand auch mal vor der Ladesäule und frage mich, wie ich an die Daten komme.

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
Till_btn (2025-04-28 15:19:25+00:00): Hi,
bei den Steckertypen gibt es nicht viele verschiedene, der Standard in Europa ist Typ 2 (bei öffentlichen Säulen meistens ohne, aber selten wie hier auch mit integriertem Kabel) und CCS (in OSM type2_combo, immer mit integriertem Kabel) für Schnellladesäulen. Die Ladeleistung in kW steht oft dran, Typ 2 hat i.d.R. 22 kW (type2_cable manchmal 43 kW), die meisten einfachen Wallboxen haben 11 kW, manchmal auch nur 3,7 kW. 
Bei dieser Ladesäule habe ich anhand des Hinweises 150 kW für CCS eingetragen. Zu den anderen Anschlüssen stand dort nichts, aber Comfortcharge hat nur einen einzigen Typ Schnellladesäule, daher also die anderen Tags. 
Da die meisten Ladesäulen vom Bund gefördert sind, tauchen sie auch in der Ladekarte der Bundesnetzagentur auf. Die ist für OSM freigegeben, ist aber auch nicht immer zu 100% korrekt
dadavid (2025-05-06 01:22:22+00:00): Hi Sam35, 

du hast hier aus dem name="IKEA Planungsbüro" ein name="IKEA" mit branch=Planungsbüro gemacht. Das finde ich jetzt in Kombination mit shop=furniture irgendwie verwirrend. Der Name der draußen dransteht ist ja "IKEA Planungsbüro" und nicht "IKEA". Wieso war der vorherige Name denn falsch? 

Ich finde branch=* grundsätzlich auch gut, aber dann müsste man vlt aus dem shop=furniture ein office=interior_design machen? 
Wäre ja eh richtiger, denn Möbel kaufen kann man da ja nicht direkt in größerem Umfang. 

Wie siehst du das? :) 

Viele Grüße und weiterhin happy mapping

David
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dinterior_design
Sam35 (2025-05-17 10:05:48+00:00): Hallo
branche=Planungbüro sollt man löschen da IKEA ja kein Planungsbüro (Ingenieurbüro) ist.
office=interior_design passt auch nicht so ganz da IKEA sicher nur sein Sortiment verplant und verkauft.
Richtig wäre mM "IKEA Planungsstudio" wie auf der HP.
Diesen Objekttyp gibt es leide noch nicht in der OSM
was meinst du?
silversurfer83 (2025-04-27 10:47:43+00:00): Hi :)

da die Ladestation auf einem PKW-Parkplatz steht, gehe ich davon aus, dass sie für PKW gedacht ist. Hast du noch Details zu Station? Welche Stecker dort zB vorhanden sind? Betreiber? Irgendwas :)

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165497032
Crazycake (2025-04-27 15:58:23+00:00): Leider Nein,
hab ich auch erst nach der Rückfahrt gesehen das die noch nicht bei OSM getaggt ist und mir gedacht lieber so als gar nicht.
silversurfer83 (2025-04-27 16:11:59+00:00): Alles klar. Ja, besser als nichts.
Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung
Andres Valdes (2025-04-27 09:40:28+00:00): How can I delete this? I didn't mean to publish it.
Glassman (2025-04-27 20:54:37+00:00): Reverted. OSM is a live database. We do have a dev server. Let me know if you need more info on it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165497197
eggie (2025-04-27 11:24:56+00:00): In de  BGT/Kadaster heet de straat wel 
Lheebroek.
Wanneer dat dus veranderd is  loopt de data van de overheid dus achter.
Je kunt dan een terugmelding doen bij de BGT/Kadaster via onderstaande link.
Ik heb het bruggetje ook aangepast ondertussen.

https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=225236.36&geometry.y=540724.07&zoomlevel=12.16

Ga even na hoe het werkelijk zit bij het Kadaster, want de BGT is leidend. 
MVG
eggie
René Stout (2025-04-27 14:07:41+00:00): Hallo Eggie, Ik kreeg de naam door van 'locals´. Ik ga daar dinsdag zelf naartoe en zal ter plekke de straatnaambordjes controleren. Wordt vervolgd.
Groet, René
eggie (2025-04-27 14:48:01+00:00): Mocht het kloppen dan graag doorgeven middels een terugmelding aan de BGT/Kadaster.. zie link boven.
Groet
eggie
SafwatHalaby (2025-04-27 11:30:59+00:00): Hello! Welcome to OSM.

 You marked רחוב רוטשילד as a private road. Is this road inaccessible to the public?
Sandra Minkov (2025-04-27 12:28:36+00:00): Hey :)
True, this road is inside Knesset (Israel's parliament) and entering there requires permission. Thanks!