piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bxl-forever_repair (2025-07-26 17:31:57+00:00): As you said yourself in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4864513, Plantage is gone and was replaced with Gao Dumpling.

This is what I did with this node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8018696487/history

The purpose was to fix changeset 169157878 where the user added a new node for Gao Dumpling next to Plantage. This was wrong.

Your comment suggests that *my* changeset is a mistake.  Can you please explain why do you think I did it wrong.
kabelhaai (2025-07-26 17:34:24+00:00): No its fine I looked up their website now. All good.
Filip009 (2025-07-22 14:22:43+00:00): Dobrý deň, používajte prosím lepšie popisy sád zmien https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn
FajrAl (2025-08-09 03:15:01+00:00): Kenapa bisa jadi jalan sekunder?
GMdika (2025-08-10 11:46:53+00:00): Jalan sekunder adalah jenis jalan yang menghubungkan kawasan-kawasan dengan fungsi sekunder dalam suatu wilayah perkotaan atau pedesaan. Kriteria utama jalan sekunder meliputi fungsi menghubungkan antar kawasan, volume lalu lintas yang sedang, dan kecepatan kendaraan yang moderat. Selain itu, jalan sekunder juga memiliki lebar jalan yang sedang, tidak terlalu lebar seperti jalan arteri atau kolektor, namun juga tidak terlalu sempit seperti jalan lingkungan. 

Bedasarkan survei lapangan dan Pengamatan saya, Jalan tersebut telah memenuhi kriteria sebagai jalan sekunder. Karena jalan-jalan tersebut merupakan akses penghubung antar desa, kecamatan, dan bahkan daerah pengembangan bisnis yang baru. Beberapa jalan seperti jalan baru, jalan raya tonjong telah dilalui transportasi umum seperti angkot serta menghubungkan jalan arteri/primer seperti jalan Bomang dan jalan Raya Parung. CMIIW

Thanks
FajrAl (2025-08-10 15:37:10+00:00): Terima kasih. Maka jalan sebelah utara Pengasinan dan timur Citayam harus direklasifikasi menjadi sekunder juga untuk konsistensi; tidak berhenti di sana. Perlu diperhatikan juga dibagian jembatan, bagian itu sering tertinggal. Hanya bahan masukan.
Taya_S (2025-09-24 10:37:36+00:00): Hello Adrie Stoopen,

Why does only this small section not have the "hazmat=designated" tag? What does this tag have to do with opening dates?
Taya_S (2025-09-24 10:38:25+00:00): The same goes for the maxspeed here. Is there just one small section where cars are allowed to drive 120 before they have to slow down to 60 km/h again?
user_5359 (2025-07-19 18:12:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is this service every day on 10:45 or only Sundays? In this case you mist the shortcut Su before the time (we use the 24 hours notation)
drewdixon (2025-07-20 11:10:48+00:00): Thanks for the feedback!
b-jazz (2025-07-19 15:59:19+00:00): sorry
custodiankeyy (2025-07-20 18:21:15+00:00): Merhaba, Bülent Ecevit Caddesi'ndeki hız sınırı gerçekten de 30 mu?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/207919381
berkehany (2025-07-21 22:21:14+00:00): bu caddeye cok yakin oturuyorum. hatirladigim kadariyla buralarda bir tabela gormedim. ancak sehirici oldugu icin ve yol cok da genis olmadigi icin 30 oldugunu varsaydim. 40 ile gittiginizde bile tehlike olusturuyor.
custodiankeyy (2025-07-22 00:32:25+00:00): Cevabınız için teşekkür ederim. Eğer legal hız sınırını öğrenirseniz lütfen burayı değiştirmeyi veya bana haber vermeyi unutmayın.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-07-22 08:56:36+00:00): maxspeed= etiketinin viki sayfasında yasal hız sınırı denmiş. Yani hız sınırı levhası, il trafik komisyonu kararı vb. yasal bir dayanak olmadığı sürece maxspeed= etiketi ile hız sınırı eklenmemeli. 
İyi günler.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed
NeisBot (2025-07-19 16:24:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-20 05:42:13+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/169162381
bartgron (2025-07-19 21:16:12+00:00): Czy ta droga na pewno została dodana we właściwym miejscu? Według Geoportalu numery domów 122-126 oraz należące do nich działki znajdują się trochę bardziej na północ oraz droga powinna być ustawiona pod trochę innym kątem w stosunku do drogi głównej (powinna iść dokładnie na zachód)
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-19 16:41:33+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13011918868

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MarkLamont (2025-07-19 16:49:54+00:00): should those points be deleted or should they be changed to "Driveway" what is the proper way to do that?
partyfan (2025-07-19 17:56:23+00:00): https://www.stradeanas.it/it/anas/app/ordinanze/get_ordinanza_pdf?ord_id=121224
mweper (2025-07-20 11:39:42+00:00): Hola German. Bienvenido y gracias por colaborar.
Fijate que ya agregaste un nodo de clínica anteriormente y este sería un duplicado. Si querés editar o mover el anterior nodo, podés hacerlo desde el editor web.
Si pudieras corregir esto, te lo agradecería y si no sabés cómo o querés que yo lo haga, me avisas por este medio o por MP.
Saludos y feliz mapeo!
jyg1093 (2025-07-20 09:43:49+00:00): 김제시 용지면 봉의리 일대 (1차) - 황토로 동부-관제 남부 1
joel56dt (2025-08-14 22:59:24+00:00): Hi Luya,
This was a duplicate so I combined it with the existing amenity.
Thanks,
Joel
Hufkratzer (2025-07-19 23:09:33+00:00): Hi,
it looks like you have split one riding centre into four here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1392097834
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415929062
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415929063
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415929064
I don't think this was a good idea. As explained on the wiki page for the leisure=horse_riding tag, this tag should be used for the entire riding centre once and not for all the objects that belong to it. What you have mapped now and tagged with leisure=horse_riding looks like riding arenas and round pens (https://www.jhrc.co.jp/images/gallery1.jpg) and should be tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian instead of leisure=horse_riding.
Compare
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/580524439#map=18/35.986371/139.617027&layers=P (example)

In JOSM you can use the preset for sport=equestrian to tag riding arenas.
Comino (2025-07-19 20:39:32+00:00): Hi Casa Lunarito,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#legacy-tags
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin
aceman444 (2025-07-26 22:34:16+00:00): Zdravim, davajte trochu pozor, upravujete zastavku, ktora ani neexistuje, len ju nespravne oznacil predosly autor v strede cesty. Pozerajte si historiu objektov.
Florek89 (2025-07-19 19:33:36+00:00): Witam, budowa już się rozpoczęła, czy jeszcze nie? Wiem, że już od jakiegoś czasu sprzedają tu mieszkania, ale jakiś czas tam nie przejeżdżałem, a z chęcią dodam więcej informacji o tym. Z góry dziękuję za informację.
owiecc (2025-07-19 19:55:14+00:00): Jeszcze nie. Teren jest jedynie ogrodzony.
NightH (2025-10-20 13:45:06+00:00): Az utcanévtáblákon Lajtaszer van írva. Van valami más forrás a Lajta szer írásmódra?
vasony (2025-10-22 20:42:01+00:00): Én csak egységesítettem, mert a legutóbbi módosítás csak az utcaszakasz 1 részét érintette és azért erre mert ez volt a hivatalos. Pl. földhivatalnál.

Ha a táblákon egybe van, akkor írd vissza, mert az a mérvadó, csak akkor minden szakaszát meg a házszámokat is.
Dimitar155 (2025-07-31 20:28:25+00:00): Благодаря за промяната!

Всичко изглежда добре, имам само два коментара.

Препоръчително е да използвате сателитните снимки на esri за територията на София, понеже са по-актуални и с по-малко отместване.

Оператора следва да се изписва на български, тъй като това е официални език в България. Има и техническата подробност че Столична община е собственик на инфраструктурата, а оператор е "Улично осветление" или "ЛогСиберия" (зависи от района), но не мисля че е особено важно за нас.

Оставам на разположение ако имате въпроси.

Поздрави,
Митко
BartekChom (2025-07-20 04:24:28+00:00): Dziękuję za rozwiązanie zagadki.
Leo Slager (2025-07-20 16:09:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Tom van Dijk (2025-08-06 19:19:10+00:00): I think this changeset is way too spread apart... it spans at least 5 countries I think...
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169166462
-karlos- (2025-08-07 06:29:33+00:00): I did have the same doubts and asked in the forum and got an "ok":
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/define-check-and-automated-correct-string-values-for-the-tag-colour-for-buildings/129467/35
literan (2025-07-20 16:15:28+00:00): хотите узнать, почему островки не рендерятся?)
settler_ (2025-07-20 18:39:49+00:00): да лучше бы они рисовались просто, а не опять эти мультичтото-там :)
literan (2025-07-20 20:28:36+00:00): чудес не бывает, и поверх воды острова не плавают)

area=yes лишний, и надо было включать как член мультиполигона воды с ролью inner...
settler_ (2025-07-20 20:42:03+00:00): я вижу как сделан островок выше по течению, но я вообще не понимаю, как добавить это самое "новое отношение" (а именно "реку"). естественно я пытаюсь просто нажать на "реку" на этом всё моменте как вижу я "всё ломается и не понятно, что можно сделать".
literan (2025-07-20 20:48:03+00:00): ну, я тут не помогу. Я правлю в редакторе JOSM, и тут все легко и просто, одной кнопкой. iD не пользуюсь...

исправлю тогда сам
custodiankeyy (2025-07-20 18:40:19+00:00): Merhaba, bazı gerekli düzenlemeleri yaptım. Eğer ileride düzenlemeye devam etmek isterseniz aşağıdaki linkten nası yaptığıma bakabilirsiniz.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169209884
Mammi71 (2025-08-05 19:03:35+00:00): Hallo Chris, Kraftfahrstraße wird als motorroad=yes getaggt (bzw. ist es hier auch) und das ist nicht das gleiche wie trunk. Die Anforderungen für trunk sind hier nicht erfüllt (mind.2aufeinanderfolgende kreuzungsfreie Anschlüsse und kein Überholen auf Gegenfahrbahn möglich (rechtlich oder baulich)
Patchanka (2025-07-29 20:29:26+00:00): hello
sur les entrées par exemple https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12917305866
le tag addr:flats=0 n'a pas lieu d'être? Je ne sais pas ce que tu voulais indiquer avec ça ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:addr:*#Sous-cl%C3%A9s_moins_communes
user_5359 (2025-07-20 14:21:43+00:00): Welcoem to OSM! Please notice this a production database not a place for a joke! I revert your change set.
gurglypipe (2025-07-20 17:26:52+00:00): Heya, thanks for your edits recently. :) Did you know that you can press the ‘Q’ key to automatically square the corners of buildings when you add them? It makes regular buildings easier to draw.

Please also note that you should align the aerial imagery with the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels overlay (in the ‘Background Settings’ panel on the right in the editor) before editing, to account for parallax errors in the imagery. The error can be 0-3m in both dimensions and varies from village to village, so it’s important to get the offset right.

Happy to answer any questions you might have about this :) Happy editing!
Peter Muret (2025-09-09 09:06:41+00:00): Hallo Kuhni,
bist du die von dir geänderten Wege auch schon begangen? Die Kreuzspitze ist zum Beispiel nicht so schwierig wie von dir angegeben (reine Bergwanderung, nichts "alpines").

Schöne Grüße,
Peter
kuhni74 (2025-09-09 09:27:47+00:00): Hallo Peter! Nein bin ich nicht, aber ich habe die Quellen für meine Klassifikationen klar benannt, und die sagt u.a., dass das oberste Gratstück zur Kreuzspitze durchaus fordernder und T4 ist (https://www.hikr.org/tour/post194227.html). Warum hast Du die Klassifikationen schon wieder geändert, ehe ich antwortete? Und was sind Deine Quellen für Deine Klassifikationen?
user_5359 (2025-07-20 14:18:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add useful change set comments. I delete your marking.
vslatten (2025-07-19 20:46:52+00:00): Did this change mess up the rendering of the forest multipolygon relation, see nearby note? First time adding a relation, so may well have done something wrong
tutuw002 (2025-07-27 11:55:02+00:00):  All national routes in Japan are classified as highway=trunk.
sembelst134 (2025-07-21 09:17:54+00:00): Hallo, ich möchte fragen woher die Info über Pfad 1415948026 kommt. Vom Satellitenbild kann ich nichts erkennen, auch mit Mapillary etc nicht. Zudem scheinen dort laut Brandenburg DGM Karte 2 Abhänge zu sein.
Ich könnte mir bei dem Pfad, wenn überhaupt, nur den östlichen Teil vorstellen, weil dort dann noch eine ungemapte Spur (DOP20 Karte) nach NW verläuft
gpserror (2025-07-20 05:24:07+00:00): thanks I put in note 4864455, windows were all boarded up, just didnt have enough time to login.
trial (2025-09-07 19:27:23+00:00): Bonjour je vois que vous avez mis comme jauge 600 (OK) et 1435.
 Ce 1435 m'étonne. l'ancienne voie était métrique et le but étant de restaurer une voie métrique, est-ce bien 1435 et non 1000 ? LA BD Ortho IGN semble aussi plutôt aller dans ce sens.
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemin_de_fer_de_Bon-Repos
lymkwi (2025-09-08 08:49:37+00:00): Bonjour,
J'avoue ne pas avoir sorti mon mètre pour mesurer sur place; j'ai cru voir une gauge étroite et une plus grande qui m'avait l'air de taille standarde (1435) en comparaison. Si le contexte du lieu et de l'époque fait qu'elle est probablement métrique, alors elle devait être métrique. N'hésitez pas à changer!
idshklein (2025-09-01 18:49:32+00:00): way 52533041 should be split - the current state is impossible regarading a oneway cul de sac. I want to make sure this is true before I edit.
gurglypipe (2025-07-20 17:32:24+00:00): Heya, thanks for your updates to the priory. You deleted the electric bike charging socket — was that intentional? Does the priory no longer have electric bike charging for customers? Thanks :)
ilias_ (2025-07-19 23:02:59+00:00): Not really a café, it’s a juice shop/juice fast food
mcgma760 (2025-07-19 23:21:27+00:00): @ilias_ I know you’re not smart, but there are restricted categories to select. It is not a “restaurant” or a “grocery shop” so the closest fit is “cafe”. Stop with your pointless criticism.
ilias_ (2025-07-19 23:37:47+00:00): @mcgma760 hahaha damn, who hurt you like this brother?

The closest fit is not “cafe”, it’s amenity=fast_food combined with cuisine=juice. You only have 118 edits so I guess you don’t have a lot of experience, that’s why you had no idea actual tags existed. You should read the OSM wiki, for a start (see for example https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Juice)

And you should also avoid telling someone with 2700 edits and local knowledge about the area you’re editing (I’ve been to Planète des Fruits many times, terrific juices and milkshakes btw) that they’re “not smart” and giving “nonsense criticism”, when it’s the other way around.
mcgma760 (2025-07-19 23:56:00+00:00): LOL your life revolves around 2700 edits? Get a liiiife. 

My input UI does not have the full swathe of tags, it is limited to general header categories. So I reiterate: your pointless criticism is not welcome, you are unfriendly and your life is sad to be making such edits with 17 minutes of upload. What a sad sad life you live.
ilias_ (2025-07-19 23:58:24+00:00): Brother, I don’t care if whatever app you’re using doesn’t have the correct tags, use another app then, but don’t put wrong tags and start talking shit to someone who simply stated the facts (it’s not a café but a juice shop).
ilias_ (2025-07-19 23:58:39+00:00): Brother, I don’t care if whatever app you’re using doesn’t have the correct tags, use another app then, but don’t put wrong tags and start talking shit to someone who simply stated the facts (it’s not a café but a juice shop).
Gregory Peony (2025-07-25 03:08:16+00:00): Hi, all footprints you mapped here represent buildings and are appropritaely squared. The footprint I flagged is oversized becasue it includes a yard to its south. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169171983
Gregory Peony (2025-07-25 03:34:31+00:00): Resolution https://osmcha.org/changesets/169429366
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169171983
Gregory Peony (2025-07-25 03:26:50+00:00): All footpritns valid, though generally the footprints you map are slightly oversized. The two I flagged are the most obvious ones. A building's footprint is generally still considered accurate if it's slightly smaller than a pitched roof becasue it likely overhangs the walls somewhat. This helps avoid data overlaps and other issues in feature dense areas. Watch this video for an example of how to edit existing data in JOSM https://youtu.be/BDGP_-Dlepo?feature=shared. I hope you find it useful.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169172046
Gregory Peony (2025-07-25 03:35:13+00:00): See how I mapped these buildings in https://osmcha.org/changesets/169429891
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169172046
marczoutendijk (2026-02-13 15:52:53+00:00): Hi,
In this changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4274984630/history/3
you changed barrier=yes to barrier=1
What is that supposed to mean?

Also here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/752914842/history/2
and here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178505163/history/5

Best regards  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
FeetAndInches (2025-07-19 22:20:09+00:00): I requested for someone to review these edits to double check that RapiD data can be used in this way.
user_5359 (2025-07-20 09:34:05+00:00): As the address nodes have a complete address, it is not necessary to describe the building with the streets.
felipeeugenio (2025-07-19 22:20:46+00:00): Note	Contributor	Tmstmp UTC	Action	Comment
4865000 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-19 23:56	closed	ok
4865007 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-19 23:56	closed	ok
4865001 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-19 23:56	closed	ok
4865008 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-19 23:56	closed	ok
4865002 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-19 23:56	closed	ok
4864989 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-19 23:56	closed	ok
4865003 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-19 23:56	closed	ok
4865004 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-19 23:56	closed	ok
4865005 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-19 23:56	closed	ok
4864999 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-19 23:56	closed	ok
4865006 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-19 23:56	closed	ok
partyfan (2025-09-02 16:42:31+00:00): a partire dal 15/06/2025 dalle ore 06:00 fino al 30/06/2026 alle ore 24:00
Interesserà: tutti  gli utenti https://www.stradeanas.it/it/anas/app/ordinanze/get_ordinanza_pdf?ord_id=125447
Alliegaytor (2025-07-20 00:23:44+00:00): Hi,

I've partially reverted this changeset in https://www.osm.org/changeset/169174921 and restored the crossing (node/5158305356). I've confirmed in a recent survey that there is indeed an unmarked crossing there with the kerb lowered on both sides. There's no indication that it isn't a crossing. It connects the two paths and is naturally used as a crossing, so I've restored it as such. Please don't remove it!
rtaylor4 (2025-07-20 01:08:31+00:00): It's a driveway/vehicle entrance for council vehicles. Not a crossing. I walk passed it daily as I live nearby.
BCNorwich (2025-07-20 05:27:58+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Sorry to say your correction was to create a duplicate highway. The correct correction was to rename the existing section of highway, thus keeping the previous history intact and not disrupting routing.

I've removed the duplicate way and renamed the existing way. Please check.

Regards Bernard.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-19 22:41:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1352483240

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Makeena (2025-12-20 20:56:45+00:00): Don't blindly delete important parts of relations without respecting notes and instructions about the current local situation if you don't have any local knowledge!
gurglypipe (2025-07-21 13:14:27+00:00): I merged this with the boundary stone node on the road, based on geograph evidence and the official list entry in the National Heritage List for England.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169243583

If this is wrong, and you’ve surveyed it, and the boundary stone really is inside a barn, then please revert my edit.

Otherwise please double-check what you’re doing when you make edits. It seems really unlikely that a boundary stone would actually be inside a barn.
BCNorwich (2025-07-20 06:27:19+00:00): Hi, The college is already mapped here:- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1332635900   Thus I've removed your duplicate area.

I've also amended the tagging to the scouts ground.

Regards Bernard.
Clarke22 (2025-07-19 23:22:20+00:00): correction - CSULB
user_5359 (2025-07-20 08:47:22+00:00): Hello! Please notice this is a production database!
bob1984 (2025-07-22 18:21:59+00:00): Understood. Testing a new frontend app I am building - "test mode" failed to work and accidentally submitted my test points for real.
Is there a dev/test db I can point to?
user_5359 (2025-07-22 18:36:13+00:00): Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing.
bob1984 (2025-07-22 18:44:51+00:00): Ah, great! I am admittedly pretty new to OSM, still learning. Appreciate it.
বাংলাদেশ (2025-07-20 01:00:33+00:00): Ramkrishnapur, Homna,Cumilla, Bangladesh
b-jazz (2025-07-21 18:32:57+00:00): RE: http://osm.org/way/1416012868

Hey there Max,

There were a few problems with this change that I will fix but wanted you to be aware of in hopes you avoid them in the future.

* Around the hole listed above, the tee box to the West of that rough had a golf=hole way that had two nodes in the tee box. The typical way to map a hole line is to just map from the farthest tee.
* The same tee box should have been excluded from the drawing of the rough section, since the tee itself is not "rough", but "tee".
* You forgot to share this node: http://osm.org/node/13012884504 in the drawing of the rough, so the rough was overlapping the fairway (which is a Q/A check that triggered me into looking at the problem).
* The rough at http://osm.org/node/13012884534 extends over the golfcart path when it shouldn't. 

As I mentioned, I've corrected all these, but just wanted you to be aware. Thanks.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-20 01:41:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385494124
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385494125

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
syntex (2025-07-21 17:37:19+00:00): Poprawione