piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-02-26 14:52:20+00:00): Thank you for helping to fix these.
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
homer__simpsons (2026-04-05 21:27:07+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez ajouté "not:network:wikidata" à la relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6682809/history/83 sur ce changeset. Était-ce volontaire ? Le nertwork:wikidata a ensuite été ré-ajouté avec https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6682809/history/90
homer__simpsons (2026-04-06 13:04:49+00:00): D'après les échanges sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144542662 j'ai retiré les not:network:wikidata avec ce changeset changeset/180945555
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
legofahrrad (2023-02-23 17:23:51+00:00): Hallo! Ist hier wirklich keine Einbahnstraße? Falls sie für Fahrräder freigegeben ist, muss "oneway:bicycle=no" ergänzt werden. Das einfache Löschen von oneway geht dann nicht.
Viele Grüße
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
BCNorwich (2023-02-22 08:12:57+00:00): Hi, The details of the school in general are held in the tagging of the school area outline including the school name. Thus the school name is not needed on individual school buildings or features, it only duplicates instances of the name being rendered.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2023-02-28 07:39:43+00:00): Duplicated school names removed.
Hikaruchu (2023-07-27 05:26:17+00:00): Not sure if this road warrants a classification of tertiary. At a maximum I would say unclassified.
Joseph R P (2023-07-27 16:59:48+00:00): Oak Street does seem like a textbook definition of a tertiary road to me. It's a shortcut between two other major roads and it looks like it's intended to be a collector road due to it having a centerline like the majority of collector roads throughout the area do.
Hikaruchu (2023-07-27 17:56:20+00:00): You're right about the center line. I'm convinced :) 
Thanks for the quick response; Happy mapping!
user_18526234 (2023-02-22 09:24:51+00:00): Hello atpl_pilot,
I seems that you have added or eddited some landuse=village_green. Please read:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=village_green
Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
Please read:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=greenery
For a list of alternative tags.

The object in question is:
https://www.osm.org/way/1148324168

Greetings Tjuro
atpl_pilot (2023-02-22 13:24:53+00:00): 1.. Bitte sprich deutsch mit mir.
2. In diesem Fall ist village_green richtig, da dort auch Veranstaltungen stattfinden. So habe ich diesen "tag" in Erinnerung. 
3. Ich liebe es, wenn frische Accounts, die noch nichts editiert haben, einem seit ca. 12 Jahren aktiven Mapper belehren wollen.

Noch einen schönen Tag und wenn Dir mein Edith nicht gefällt, dann ändere es doch.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Stefan
LoudounMapper (2023-05-17 20:51:07+00:00): Looks like this trail opened today - probably better if you do the honors since it is a bit outside of my comfort zone. https://twitter.com/jwpascale/status/1658849479955447811
Joseph R P (2023-05-18 00:21:22+00:00): Thanks for updating me on that, I've updated the construction of the trail now.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
MxxCon (2023-02-22 05:11:30+00:00): Climbing playground with surface of asphalt?🤨 That's going to be a lot of broken bones and lawsuits...
Also please note that in OSM multiple values should be listed using ; not , or _
For example "material=metal;wood"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132852523
Hufkratzer (2023-02-23 19:04:03+00:00): Hi,
this looks like a building and was mapped as a building, but you have removed the tag building=yes. Therefore it is no longer rendered as a building.
If it is a building, it should have a building tag, no matter what other tags it has.
The tag leisure=horse_riding is not really for individual buildings; it should be used for the entire area of riding centres, compare:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding
If the building is a riding hall / indoor arena, you can use the tag
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Abuilding%3Driding_hall
kechan (2023-02-23 22:29:25+00:00): The building was removed? I think Go Map overrid the building=yes tag. I will add the building=riding_hall tag to the way.
Hufkratzer (2023-02-24 09:51:43+00:00): Probably (I don't know Go Map). iD does that too if you select a building and change it ro horse_riding.
user_18526234 (2023-02-22 09:24:49+00:00): Hello !i!,
I seems that you have added or eddited some landuse=village_green. Please read:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=village_green
Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
Please read:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=greenery
For a list of alternative tags.

The object in question is:
https://www.osm.org/way/113685133

Greetings Tjuro
gscholz (2023-02-27 10:19:47+00:00): Hi busnotturno95,
I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues discussed here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132803419

Guido
charles chilufya (2023-02-21 21:19:03+00:00): review some edits. thank you for you time took to map here,
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132853735
charles chilufya (2023-02-21 21:17:58+00:00): review your works. Thanks for mapping and the time took.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132853744
charles chilufya (2023-02-21 21:15:21+00:00): good start up
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132853753
charles chilufya (2023-02-21 21:13:28+00:00): great
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132853756
charles chilufya (2023-02-21 21:12:21+00:00): great
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132853757
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-22 01:21:42+00:00): Please use better changeset comments.  What did you change and why?

Refer here for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset_comment
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132853909
charles chilufya (2023-02-21 21:22:42+00:00): great
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132853990
Glassman (2023-02-23 17:41:03+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132854087
Glassman (2023-02-23 17:41:56+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132854087
Glassman (2023-02-23 17:40:38+00:00): #TIP: square building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132854175
Glassman (2023-02-23 17:42:56+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132854231
Glassman (2023-02-23 17:40:55+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132854284
Glassman (2023-02-23 17:41:51+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132854284
eggie (2023-02-22 06:52:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback...   Het verwijderen van wegen waar wandelen ontmoedigt wordt doe we op een andere manier. Op het manier.
Wanneer aangegevens staat dat de paden niet meer gebruikt mogen worden middels een bord dan niet de paden verwijderen, maar de juiste accesstags toevoegen. access=no  Dat routeert dan niet meer. 
Worden paden onbruikbaar gemaakt met takkenbossen dan passen we de tagging aan van highway=path naar disused:highway=path
De paden zullen dan niet meer te zien zijn op de kaart van OSM.

Het zal voorkomen dat medemappers op grond van luchtfoto's de paden weer gaan intekenen.
Het is ook verstandig om de landuse te laten aansluiten zodat je geen witruimte meer ziet. 
Pocedure Natuurmonumenten 
Zie dit draadje..
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=73238

Deze changeset draai ik voorlopig even terug. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-02-22 06:57:42+00:00): reverted by changeset #132864545

Op het moment dat de paden zijn dichtgegroeid kunnen de paden daadwerkelijk verwijderd worden. 
Ik zal de paden nu even op disused:highway=path zetten

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-22 07:06:18+00:00): Nu disused:highway=track met note=paden worden geblokkeerd door middel van takkenhopen, bomen of boomstronken. Een andere optie is het dichtleggen van paden met plaggen - afgestoken grond met begroeiing. 
Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust
MVG
eggie
urje (2023-02-22 08:28:18+00:00): Dag eggie, dankjewel voor de introductie en correctie. Disused lijkt dan inderdaad goed te passen in dit geval. Verderop (richting NO) is nog een pad weggepoetst, de bruggetjes zijn daar weggehaald. Heb ik het goed begrepen dat die bruggetjes dan ook echt van de kaart gehaald moeten worden (en het pad 'disused' wordt)?
eggie (2023-02-22 09:05:43+00:00): Precies... 
De bruggetjes gewoon verwijderen.
De paden op disused:highway=.... mits ze ontoegankelijk zijn gemaakt.
Dit om te voorkomen dat ze weer worden ingetekend.
note=....  toevoegen met korte uitleg voor medemappers.

Let wel op routerelaties dier er misscien lopen. Die zullen eerst moeten worden omgeleid. Dat kan overigens niet met editor iD. Wel met josm.
Anders even hulp vragen op bv het forum.
Mvg
eggie
user_17222985 (2024-07-31 08:02:04+00:00): офіс комунальної організації мапити як association Треба як office=company
ти придурок чи ідіот 
тобі шо правила впадло почитати 
понавпускали бля у проект всякого йобнутого сброда
Glassman (2023-02-23 17:41:46+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132854437
Glassman (2023-02-23 17:47:03+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132854468
Glassman (2023-02-23 17:41:42+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132854509
Glassman (2023-02-23 17:43:43+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132854572
Glassman (2023-02-23 17:45:25+00:00): You could have either tagged it as a shelter or building=roof + layer=1.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132854653
christian_plus1 (2023-03-15 07:35:01+00:00): Hallo kurze Frage, warum hast du den Landuse Einzelhandel auf der Seite komplett rausgelöscht? Nach meinem Verständnis passt der hier rein, da im Erdgeschoss der hier stehenden Gebäude diverse Geschäfte sind.

Beste Grüße Christian
WC392309 (2023-02-21 21:59:27+00:00): These edits were based mainly on traffic flow and just collectors to other primary roads
WC392309 (2023-02-21 21:59:49+00:00): Tell me if I made a mistake on this edit
user_18526234 (2023-02-22 09:24:50+00:00): Hello rm69,
I seems that you have added or eddited some landuse=village_green. Please read:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=village_green
Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
Please read:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=greenery
For a list of alternative tags.

The object in question is:
https://www.osm.org/way/428304472

Greetings Tjuro
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-22 01:15:07+00:00): 1) Please use better changeset comments.  What did you change and why?

2)  Please only map what is actually there.  ie - no double upping of routes for the renderer/golf game.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148348174
user_18526234 (2023-02-22 09:24:51+00:00): Hello jmsbert,
I seems that you have added or eddited some landuse=village_green. Please read:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=village_green
Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
Please read:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=greenery
For a list of alternative tags.

The object in question is:
https://www.osm.org/way/1148349112

Greetings Tjuro
jmsbert (2023-02-22 20:48:07+00:00): Hello Tjuro,
thank you for your message and the proposal to use more specific tags for the area.
I am not shure if I got you right:
Do you want me to a) replace "landuse=village_green" by another tag or b) simply add other tags?

For a) From my point of view landuse=village_green is in general the correct tag as the area is public, and open for the local community. It is common to have small areas like this in rural areas to serve as meeting point for the local community (in this case the inhabitants of a small farming community / village named "Stapelfeld". The name for places in some regions of Germany is "Anger". The German word "Anger" is translated to the English "village green".
If b) I could imagine to add the tag "landcover=greenery" as the areas consists mainly of maintained grass with a small shelter and a place for bbq.
Looking forward for your answer
Greeting, jmsbert
user_18526234 (2023-02-23 09:10:34+00:00): Hello jmsbert,

I think you are right. This looks like a valid village green.
I’m trying to cleanup landuse_village green, many new landuse_village greens should just be grass or shrubbery. So, I coded a bot that sends messages to all changesets that have a landuse village green in them. However, this also includes the very small amounts of real landuse village green.
I realise now that the benefits do not outweigh the downsides. So, I’ve disabled the bot.

Greetings Tjuro.
WC392309 (2023-02-21 22:21:34+00:00): This edit can be reverted at anytime and if I made any mistake, reach out.
Joseph R P (2023-02-21 22:53:05+00:00): I think having both 14th and 15th Streets between K Street and Constitution Avenue primary is fine, as they are both equally-important routes, making it difficult to decide which one should be primary and the other secondary if both are not the same classification, my justifications for each being:

14th Street is the most direct route between US 1 and and 16th Street, making it most useful route for through traffic. It also links to The Mall.

15th Street is the first major through road heading east from 16th Street, and connects to the White House and monuments as well ass Maine Avenue and I-395 Southbound ramps, making it an important route for local traffic.

I would, however, keep 14th Street through Columbia Heights secondary and the street tertiary through 16th Street Heights. 14th Street is a quite important through CH, and through roads like 14th north of the area, which cross paths with many other major roads and/or lead to other major roads at both ends are typically good candidates for tertiary classification.
WC392309 (2023-02-22 00:13:17+00:00): That is a good idea. I will extend 14th back to secondary at Irving Street, which I will also make secondary because it is a relatively important road in Columbia Heights, otherwise, I would leave everything as it is
WC392309 (2023-02-23 21:10:08+00:00): However, I would say that 14th has the edge for primary because it connects to 395 and is a major arterial until U street where 15th is important, but it is a collector and doesn't get as much traffic or recognition as 14th street
Joseph R P (2023-02-23 22:00:59+00:00): Most of these edits you're making look good to me and seem to make sense relative to the universal agreement of what the road classification hierarchy is used for. I would make a quick note for future reference about tertiary roads:

Most roads that lead to a dead end or closely parallel other tertiary roads probably shouldn't be tertiary- however- roads that loop back to themselves or are planned to be extended in the future as well as frontage roads or minor roads that are or are part of an alternative route to nearby major roads might also meet such criteria, but it really comes down to the specific road.

Anyways, I do thank you for helping out with working on some of these roads around here and the input you've given!
Tomas Straupis (2023-02-22 07:14:32+00:00): Atstačiau teisingą klasifikaciją. Šventoji yra Palangos dalis.
ika-chan! (2023-02-21 22:22:25+00:00): This changeset failed, because of a bug in Potlatch.
Tomas Straupis (2023-02-22 07:15:33+00:00): Atšaukta. Atstatyta teisinga klasifikacija pagal Lietuvos susitarimus.
Joseph R P (2023-04-06 17:25:45+00:00): Hello, why was this minor street changed to a motorway? I assume this is an error.
user_9437 (2023-04-06 21:34:28+00:00): Yes, you are right. This is an error on my part.
Tomas Straupis (2023-02-22 07:16:23+00:00): Atšaukta. Atstatyta klasifikacija pagal Lietuvos susitarimus.
user_18526234 (2023-02-22 09:24:51+00:00): Hello Georg_M_Weber,
I seems that you have added or eddited some landuse=village_green. Please read:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=village_green
Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
Please read:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=greenery
For a list of alternative tags.

The object in question is:
https://www.osm.org/way/662602956

Greetings Tjuro
Georg_M_Weber (2023-02-22 10:07:04+00:00): Dear Tjuro,

thank you very much for your hint. I have changed the shape but not the attribute.

Best regards

Georg
CAI Stabia (2023-02-22 09:23:36+00:00): Giovanni, la cima del monte Comune da te indicata e l'altra quota sono errate, vedi IGM e carta CAI dei M.Lattari. 
Su cosa hai basato questa modifica?
Ti preghiamo di fare attenzione nel cambiare gli elementi del territorio perchè la corretta mappatura della sentieristica è necessaria alla sicurezza delle persone. 
Per una corretta mappatura è indispensabile venire di persona sul territorio e non basarsi su foto/fonti terze.
Abbiamo effettuato il ripristino corretto delle quote.
Giovanni Forgione (2023-02-24 01:28:46+00:00): Le carte tecniche regionali sono molto più dettagliate a livello di quote e morfologia del terreno. Essendo più recenti delle obsolete IGM penso che siano più attendibili anche perché realizzate con strumentazione più nuova e più precisa. Le vecchie IGM sono tuttora utili ma solo per la toponomastica. Abbiamo avuto anche un altro scambio di vedute qualche tempo fa quando ho aggiustato le tracce sbagliate da Monte Faito al Molare. Se faccio una modifica certo non me la sogno la notte. Il mio navigatore è molto preciso perche basato su GNNS e non solo su GPS. Le modifiche su monte Comune le ho fatte dopèo esserci stato in questa settimana. Anche qua ho modificato le tracce preesistenti tracciate a caso ed irreali. La traccia che ho aggiunto e che raggiunge la vetta  adesso è reale e senza cancelli privati.
Giovanni Forgione (2023-02-24 01:30:32+00:00): Se mi dai la mail privata ti mando due mappe tecniche al 5000 del Monte Comune e dalle quali ho preso i dati.
Giovanni Forgione (2023-02-24 07:49:27+00:00): Le vecchie mappe portano la vetta più alta di Monte Comune dove adesso c'è la croce e la panchina. E' giusto che resti la a 877 perché per tutti il Monte Comune è la. Ho aggiunto la quota più alta di 888 (presente anche sulla IGM 25000 accanto a Punta Calabrice) senza però spostare la titolarità di quota 877.