piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Zekovski (2024-09-11 09:14:42+00:00): Je me suis permis de déplacer le Kebab en sus pour qu'il n'aie pas l'air d'être sur une seule rue et que l'erreur ne se reproduise.
Merci à toi.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156473212
Hufkratzer (2024-09-06 21:58:08+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1313793203 ist keine Reitanlage (gemäß https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding), sondern ein Reitplatz. In OSM werden Reitplätze normalerweise mit leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian getaggt und es gibt in iD auch einen Preset, der das macht (namens "Reitplatz"), Beispiel https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105682658.

Was https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1313793199 ist, kann ich auf den Luftbildern nicht genau erkennen, könnte ein Paddock sein mit einem Unterstand drauf o.ä. Kann man vielleicht mit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse=animal_keeping taggen (statt mit leisure=horse_riding).
Enno13 (2024-09-07 11:29:39+00:00): Hallo Hufkratzer,

Danke für die Anmerkungen. Ich habe genau das umgesetzt, was du vorgeschlagen hast. Bei deiner Vermutung hast du übrigens Recht, ich war vor Ort und es ist tatsähclich ein paddock mit Stall.
Hufkratzer (2024-09-07 18:52:04+00:00): Freut mich, dass ich richtig geraten habe. Hoffentlich konntest du da auch eine Runde reiten.
Andrew Chadwick (2024-09-06 14:47:34+00:00): The Tingewick one was just an ordering issue in the relation, so it doesn't contribute to the bounding box
ftrebien (2025-03-09 01:31:54+00:00): Essas vias não têm sinalização. Qual artigo do código de trânsito admite um limite de 60 km/h nelas?
GretaMN (2024-09-09 12:10:24+00:00): Liebe:r ElisaMK,
bitte ergänze hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1313792951 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1313792950) noch den class:bicycle Wert für ein vollständiges LG Maps Tagging.
Danke und VG, Greta :)
#lgmaps
blaberus (2024-09-06 15:02:06+00:00): Also, I found the 3rd variant on a street sigh: "HA′UMAN" :)
blaberus (2024-09-06 15:06:15+00:00): Anyway, nowhere is "HaOman" with "O"
Vinber-Pro (2024-09-17 16:51:34+00:00): Bonjour Hélène,
j'ai ajouté le fait que c'est du maraîchage biologique, avec l'attribut organic=only https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12160286374

Le lieu de vente n'est-il pas dans un des bâtiments que l'on voit ?

bonne carto
Hélène OT La Vallée du Kiwi (2024-09-19 08:24:30+00:00): Bonjour Vincent, je garde en tête l'attribut à rajouter pour le maraîchage biologique, j'ai mis un point car malheureusement je ne sais pas dans quel bâtiment est la vente. Je pourrai compléter lorsque j'aurai cette info. Merci pour ton retour ;-)
GretaMN (2024-09-09 12:12:09+00:00): Liebe:r ElisaMK,
bitte regänze hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/74440607 den lit=* Tag für ein vollständiges Tagging.
Danke! :)
#lgmaps
Mazda05 (2024-09-07 06:47:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
Juan Carlos G F (2024-09-07 17:48:08+00:00): Hola, como se te ocurre cambiar el nombre de una población, porque según tú la fuente es el DNI (Documento Nacional de Identidad).

Te agradecería que no realizaras en el futuro más cambios como estos.
jomiroca (2024-09-08 09:33:12+00:00): Buenas.
No era mi intención ofender a nadie. 
En Google Maps y los mapas de idealista. Salen Santiago de Cartes.
En catastro y cartociudad. Pone Cartes.
En un DNI tengo Santiago de Cartes .
Puedes déjalo como quieras. Lo he hecho con la mejor intención. A la próxima me limitaré a poner nombres a calles. 

Por cierto. Como se ponen números de calles!? Hay alguna forma de por api subir la geoposicion?
Rodrigo Rega (2024-09-09 17:45:36+00:00): Si quieres saber cómo se mapean números de calles echa un ojo a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Direcciones

Sobre lo de subir la geoposición vía api: No sé si entiendo bien la consulta. Me suena a que quieres hacer una importación masiva automatizada de números de calle. En ese caso consulta la siguiente página: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Importaci%C3%B3n

Lo que se está haciendo hoy en día respecto a números de calles son las importaciones desde Catastro. En esta importación se incluyen los edificios junto a sus números de portales. Para más información puedes ver la siguiente página: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Catastro_espa%C3%B1ol/Importaci%C3%B3n_de_edificios
Piotr Strębski (2024-10-04 07:09:45+00:00): Hej, nie że się czepiam, tylko prośba na przyszłość, by zwracać uwagę na te rzeczy (bo nie Ty zrobiłeś to, o czym rzecz): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32710744 - tu jest droga dojazdowa do zabudowań, więc nie może być to track (bo track to droga na pola lub leśna, bez związku z zabudowaniami); w ulicach/drogach nie stosujemy znaczników adresowych. Jak natkniesz się na te błędy - poprawiaj proszę. Serdeczne.
CivicData (2024-11-04 23:46:34+00:00): Why was this flagged as a bad edit? This is a walking path that the city parks department has marked that is not on OSM.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156279980
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-05 02:53:35+00:00): The path was mapped as separate ways between each node. 
Should be a single way.
kitsee (2024-09-06 19:11:06+00:00): Hi there drh,
its appears you've dragged a node of a wall by mistake, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1279602177#map=16/53.37311/-4.53246. please fix it
kind regards,
Kits
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156280320
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-26 03:53:34+00:00): name=Telenet
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12146291700

shop=mobile ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
teambuildingonwheels (2024-10-26 23:18:46+00:00): Hey thanks for letting me know. I corrected the shop type. This is a mobile phone/telecom shop. I always do a manual check in OSM, but I missed this one. Most of these shop were not in OSM yet. I added them with the On Wheels app when I was walking on the street.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-27 17:26:31+00:00): thanks for fixup!
Jrachi (2024-11-11 08:21:29+00:00): Ciao.
Hai aggiunto i tag che definiscono un confine amministrativo su alcune  strade.
Non ha nessun senso!
Ivo
DabMK (2024-11-14 13:29:47+00:00): Ciao, invece esistono alcune strade che fanno da confine per comuni
Jrachi (2024-11-14 16:14:02+00:00): Intendo dire che hai duplicato i tag sulla way che sono già presenti sulla relazione del boundary.
Il confine può coincidere sulla strada ma come lo hai mappato tu una qualunque modifica della strada va a modificare il confine.
Non credo che i sindaci possano essere contenti!
Ivo
DabMK (2024-11-19 19:49:54+00:00): In caso di una futura modifica della strada, qualcuno inserirà una nuova way che segue il vecchio tracciato per segnare il confine. Per la questione dei tag, ho rimosso tutte le vecchie way e lasciato la strada come confine
ivanbranco (2025-05-10 07:53:16+00:00): Attento quando cancelli dei POI, in questo caso eliminando il ristorante avevi eliminato anche l'indirizzo, che non risultava piu' nel database. Un'alternativa sarebbe di aggiungere il prefisso disused (es. disused:amenity=restaurant) cosi' che il POI rimanga disponibile e si possa aggiornare quando un altro negozio prende il suo posto.

Grazie e buon mapping
desoter (2025-05-10 08:11:15+00:00): Hai ragione, chiaro. Grazie a te
wombatmaper (2024-09-06 17:43:32+00:00): Hej,
great job, just a short question:
the vitingeleden now has a wierd junction here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=58.762389&mlon=11.643577#map=18/58.762389/11.643577 or was this already the case beforehand?
UliFR (2024-09-06 20:15:52+00:00): Hi, the marker in the link you’ve sent is not at a junction. Could you please resent it or maybe place a comment at the junction.
wombatmaper (2024-09-06 21:18:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=58.762667&mlon=11.645352#map=18/58.762667/11.645352
UliFR (2024-09-07 07:48:14+00:00): Hi again, you are referring to the turning restrictions, I presume. I don't know how those got there since I did not introduce them knowingly. Actually, I didn't even know about this property and the display for it. The junction didn't exist before my editing though, so it must have been inadvertedly introduced. I removed the restrictions now since there were no road signs indicating them.  I hope this doesn't do any collateral damages. How did you find this at all?
wombatmaper (2024-09-07 10:22:51+00:00): No, no I was refering to this relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11114629

It has a wierd junction here, see screenshot: https://imgur.com/x1xS4VA

But maybe this was already there before
UliFR (2024-09-07 12:07:05+00:00): Sorry, but I don't understand the problem. Maybe the links you give look different for me. I'm not usually mapping traffic rules and don't see what is wrong in the imgur picture. The other link for me shows the extent of Vitingeleden in full. That also looks okay to me. I'd appreciate if you could explain what is weird about this junction so that I can fix it. I still remember what it looks like. I don't think the problem was there before I added the path to the shelter. That path was not mapped yet and I still need to assign it to Vitingeleden but otherwise I don't see the problem.
UliFR (2024-09-07 13:24:03+00:00): Did you mean that the service road section (W-E) and the new path (NE-SW) were both in the relation Vitingeleden and thus formed a fork for VL that shouldn't be there? If so, I now removed the relation of the service road to VL.
wombatmaper (2024-09-07 20:36:05+00:00): Aye that was it, thanks for fixing!
martien-176 (2024-09-06 18:36:59+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. 

Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline. 

Incidentally a few building are oversized. Probably because the outline that iD Editor provides obscures the outline visible on the imagery. You can prevent this with the short cut key W, that hides the editor outline.

Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156280864
martien-176 (2024-09-06 18:37:05+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. 

Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline. 

Incidentally a few building are oversized. Probably because the outline that iD Editor provides obscures the outline visible on the imagery. You can prevent this with the short cut key W, that hides the editor outline.

Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156280864
szydzio (2024-09-06 15:35:44+00:00): Several relations were already broken before this changeset, please do not blame this changeset for it
Marc_ch (2025-07-28 09:57:24+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour ces nombreuses améliorations à Avenches.
Où avez-vous un panneau au Milavy disant que le parking est limité aux clients ?
Salutations,
Marc
eggie (2024-09-06 21:07:53+00:00): Dag ISBS,

Knippen in wegen waar routerelaties lopen gaat helaas niet met editor iD  De routerelaties raken ontregeld.
Welk bord staat er precies.
access=no is vaak verkeerd gebruikt.
Zie hoe te taggen bij welke verkeersborden
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden&direction=next&oldid=984258#C:_Geslotenverklaring

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-06 21:19:57+00:00): Ik heb de ingang naar de parkeergarage ingetekend. (Zoals ik het op you tube heb gezien. 

Die barrier=yes ontbeert nog accesstags en zou specifieker moeten.
Op de barrier zou ook nog access=no getagd kunnen worden. 

MV-G
eggie
eggie (2024-09-06 21:22:04+00:00): Tja duidelijk is het allemaal niet.
De barrier=yes wordt ook genegeerd omdat er geen accesstags opzitten. Wie mag er wel of niet door?
MVG
eggie
ImprovingStepByStep (2024-09-07 16:11:52+00:00): Dit bord voor een doodlopende weg staat er aan het begin van de straat:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nederlands_verkeersbord_L8.svg

Zie ook het at5 item van eerder dit jaar:
https://www.at5.nl/artikelen/224950/automobilisten-nog-altijd-de-fout-in-bij-frederik-hendrikplantsoen-borden-niet-gezien

Auto's mogen er niet meer langs, fietsers en voetgangers wel.  Taxis, bussen, trams kunnen er wel nog langs via de trambaan.

Help dit? Als je meer informatie nodig hebt, laat het graag weten. Dank alvast!
eggie (2024-09-07 16:41:34+00:00): Hoi.. Je had het correct gedaan.
De inrit naar de parkeergarage had ik ingetekend. Als het goed is routeert het strsks niet meer.. maar kun je wel naar de garagen.
Een barrier=,yes is vlees nog vis. De validator van josm zegt dan 'map' specifiek.. up to you als lokale mapper.
Je hebt het in ieder geval verbeterd.

Groet..
eggie
eggie (2024-09-07 19:30:48+00:00): Voor taxi s en bussen kun je psv=yes taggen om access=no te overrulen 
Gr eggie
ImprovingStepByStep (2024-09-08 15:06:48+00:00): Dank je, heb access=no aan de bollard toegevoegd en psv=yes voor de bollard en de weg in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156356227 
Hoop dat het hiermee is opgelost. Dank voor de het meedenken!
ted3sco (2024-09-09 17:44:58+00:00): Salut, ce e asta ? Nu exista nimic acolo.
eggie (2024-09-06 20:46:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-20 04:47:14+00:00): Hello!

You used
tracktype=grade35
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117192137/history

Have you maybe meant
tracktype=grade3
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
softcake (2025-02-20 06:32:51+00:00): Hi,
thanks for pointing that out. That was a typo. I've corrected it.
5m4u9 (2024-09-07 07:15:25+00:00): Hola, tienes varios errores en tu edición.

No puedes añadir todo el terreno como edificio del tipo casa. Los edificios solo deben ser dibujados de los existentes. Los terrenos puedes añadirlos pero no se "mostraran" en el mapa.
hendrik-17 (2024-11-04 20:04:50+00:00): Moin gallseife,

ich habe deine Änderung zurück gesetzt, denn der Name wird vor Ort wirklich klein geschrieben.

Siehe auch Note #2958356 und Kommentar zu CS #145526907, erkennbar z.B. auch auf diesem Foto in Wikimedia Commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AKN_Station_dodenhof,_Bild_2.JPG

Beste Grüße
hendrik-17
gallseife (2024-11-07 19:34:37+00:00): Merci
GretaMN (2024-09-09 13:54:23+00:00): Liebe:r ElisaMK,
wieso hast du den highway Tag hier zu highway=track verändert (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrack)? Auf den vorgandene Mapillay Bildern sieht es so aus, also wäre der Weg nicht für zweispurige Wirtschaftsfahrzeuge geeignet. Oder wird es nach Süden hin breiter? 
Viele Grüße,
Greta
#lgmaps
ElisaMK (2024-09-15 12:13:23+00:00): Hi Greta, da hast du Recht, da war ich kurz verwirrt denke ich :D Danke fürs Aufpassen!
#lgmaps
literan (2024-09-07 11:41:12+00:00): и зачем вы это сделали?
mavl (2024-10-23 04:33:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 158236393 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
GretaMN (2024-09-09 14:01:27+00:00): Liebe:r ElisaMK,
für die Brück kannst du auch gern alle weiteren Tags angeben (smoothness=*, surface=*, lit=*).
VG, Greta
#lgmaps
mavl (2024-10-23 04:33:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 158236393 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
Florek89 (2024-09-06 17:43:20+00:00): Bardzo stare to: check_date=2023-08-27

Na zdjęciach satelitarnych i zawsze jak jeździłem w poprzednim roku przez Regów droga wyglądała na przejezdną. Jeśli ma Pan potwierdzenie na zamknięcie to proszę o zdjęcie aktualne.
Brummelwuff (2024-09-06 18:08:23+00:00): Hallo, schreib doch bitte zu deinen Änderungen einen Komentar damit Andere leute besser verstehen was du getan hast. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Außerdem habe ich teile des Änderungssatze rückgänig gemacht da du Am Neutor den Weg mit einem Abgerissenen Gebäude verbunden hattest. An der Kinderhauser Str. hast du statt einer man_made=monitoring_station ein Gebäude eingetragen, das habe ich korrigiert.
RaketenFranz (2024-09-06 19:57:40+00:00): Wunderbar, dank dir für die Anpassung.

Ich werde mir demnächst mal JOSM anschauen. Mit GO Mobil!! war die Eingabe etwas tricky. 

Am Neutor wollte ich nur eintragen, dass die Zählstation eine Anzeige hat und eine Mapillary ID angefügt, aus der die Anzeige zu entnehmen ist.
mavl (2024-10-23 04:33:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 158236393 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2024-10-23 04:33:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 158236393 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2024-10-23 04:33:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 158236393 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
citrula (2024-09-06 20:28:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM. I have removed your edit because you drew a giant building crossing the road - let me know if you have any questions.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156291541
GretaMN (2024-09-09 14:04:46+00:00): Liebe:r ElisaMK,
bitte bei einem highway=path immer die width=* mit angeben und keinen tracktype=* Wert taggen.
VG, Greta 
#lgmaps
GretaMN (2024-09-09 14:06:02+00:00): Liebe:r ElisaMK,
bitte hier noch den class:bicycle Wert ergänzen.
Danke! :)
VG, Greta
#lgmaps
GretaMN (2024-09-09 14:07:50+00:00): Liebe:r EilsaMK,
bitte hier noch den lit=* Tag ergänzen.
Danke und VG, Greta
#lgmaps
ratrun (2024-09-08 06:45:21+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!

You added new ways without considering the already existing data. As one example see the existing way https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73364735#map=19/-7.966239/129.647456 . As you choose to completely add new better aligned ways you need to remove the old data from before.
Can you please take one look again and remove the data where necessary?

Thanks ratrun
GretaMN (2024-09-09 14:12:30+00:00): Liebe ElisaMK,
bitte hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1313816314 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1313815523) den surface=* Tag überarbeiten!
Danke und viele Grüße :)
Greta
#lgmaps
TrickyFoxy (2024-09-06 19:10:42+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156289280
mavl (2024-10-23 04:33:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 158236393 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
TrickyFoxy (2024-09-06 19:09:58+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156289254
mavl (2024-10-23 04:33:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 158236393 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
Anakil (2025-10-16 13:49:40+00:00): Bonjour Ardennen8, je viens de voir plusieurs de tes changesets de la région où tu modifies énormément de route qui était précédemment correctement cartographiée, et tu les change pour qu'elle soit proche de ce qu'affiche la carte (en anglais on parle de "mapping for the renderer"). Or c'est incorrect sur OSM, car on représente la route avant tout de manière logique et non visuelle uniquement. On utilise les tags pour représenter les bandes de circulations, là où on tourne,... plutôt que plein de petites géométries séparées. Cela complexifie beaucoup la carte pour aucune information supplémentaire (et cela rend les calculs d'itinéraire plus complexe car il y a plus d'intersections que nécessaire). 

Par exemple, les routes qui ne sont pas physiquement séparées ne doivent pas être mises sur plusieurs lignes, on a des tags pour ça (par exemple, une sortie d'autoroute à 3 bandes, là où il y a la bande de sortie, on tag "lanes=4" + "turn:lanes=none|none|slight_right" et on laisse le noeud de sortie au dernier moment juste avant que la route se sépare physiquement (soit un mur/barrière séparant les deux, soit pour une sortie d'autoroute la zone impassable pour un véhicule de manière logique donc). Voir le wiki du tag en question pour plus d'infos avec des visuels : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:turn (tout en bas, il y a un exemple d'entrée/sortie d'autoroute et comment c'est taggé et à quel endroit on sépare la voie). 

Quand on crée la carte, même avec une simple ligne, on peut afficher les bandes de circulation correctement grâce aux tags. Aucun besoin de faire les petites géométries "exactes". 

Merci d'avance,
Anakil (membre de la communauté d'OpenStreetMap Belgium)
TrickyFoxy (2024-09-06 19:09:10+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156289237
NeisBot (2024-09-06 16:52:38+00:00): Hi OSINACHI PASCAL EZEKIEL, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 83% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 123 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=156284202
pitscheplatsch (2024-09-09 09:19:40+00:00): Ok, some contributors have added buildings, while others have occasionally removed them at a later time.
Im Fokus (2025-08-28 17:48:42+00:00): Was bedeutet "unzugefügt"? War "hinzugefügt" gemeint? Etwas mehr Sorgfalt bitte.
mavl (2024-10-23 04:33:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 158236393 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
gscholz (2024-10-09 06:45:33+00:00): Hi j0k4i,
your edits along this protected area have left behind a broken relation with only "inner" items, interrupted boundaries and areas without an "inner" or "outer" assignment:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-58.18781&lat=-26.18321&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Can you please fix this?
kind regards
Guido
j0k4i (2024-10-09 15:42:45+00:00): Hi gscholz
I'm going to fix it.
mavl (2024-10-23 04:33:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 158236393 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
TrickyFoxy (2024-09-06 19:07:52+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156289203
mavl (2024-10-23 04:33:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 158236393 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].