piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
felipeeugenio (2023-06-07 22:17:34+00:00): Gracias por las ediciones. Se ve que conoce el lugar. Sin embargo hay varios detalles
1) si está interesado, tenemos un chat en Telegram (app similar a whatsapp) en donde cientos de maperos de chile conversan y resuelven dudas. Puede acceder al chat en el link: https://t.me/OSMcl
2) si un local desaparece o cambia, la dirección sigue existiendo. Borró varios locales por esos motivos supuestamente, pero hizo desaparecer las direcciones también
3= agregó varios mall en la calle, siendo que nada ahpi calza con un mall. Para saber de qué se tratan los tags puede preguntar en el chat o bien consultar la wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmall). Esos lugares a lo más son bazares.
3) puede cuadrar las estructuras con la letra Q en ID. las dejó todas chuecas.

Estos son errores típicos de quienes comienzan y son muy normales. De hecho, ya arreglé todo, pero por si le interea comenzar a mapear le sugiero entrar al chat. Ahí podrá hacer todas las preguntas que desee y siempre tendrá quien le responda.

saludos
aseidel (2023-06-08 08:28:45+00:00): Liebe:r schmaybe,
hier bitte nochmal genau nach der surface=* schauen: In Melbeck sind die letzten ca. 100m bis zur Ebstorfer Straße mit Gehwegsteinen gepflastert (surface=paving_stones). Außerdem endet die Geometrie "im Nichts", muss hier aber an die Ebstorfer Straße angeschlossen werden: bitte sprechen Sie mich kommenden Mittwoch einmal auf diese Stelle an, damit ich das der gesamten Gruppe zeigen kann. Wir haben hier noch ein paar Besonderheiten, die es zu beachten gilt.
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-07 21:20:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9033040506
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1122488997

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
xry567 (2023-06-07 21:34:25+00:00): duplikat usunięty
StC (2023-06-10 21:05:57+00:00): Bonjour,

sauf erreur de ma part ce changeset a cassé la relation Voie de Vézelay. Habituellement, l'éditeur préserve les relations en coupant les chemins en deux, il y a peut-être eu une fausse manip.

A bientôt,

StC
Scout Jens (2023-06-11 11:27:56+00:00): Bonjour,

la relation est toujours là.

Cordialement, Jens
StC (2023-06-11 12:15:13+00:00): Présente, oui. Mais rendue incomplète (avec un trou au milieu de l'itinéraire), et donc les algorithmes de routage ne fonctionnent plus. 

En principe, quand on coupe en deux un chemin qui appartient à une relation, l'éditeur met les deux parties dans la relation pour préserver la continuité. Donc là il s'est produit quelque chose.

Voir https://knooppuntnet.nl/fr/monitor/groups/fr-iwn-Camino pour comprendre comment nous surveillons la continuité des itinéraires.

A bientôt,

StC
Scout Jens (2023-06-11 17:48:48+00:00): Je suppose que ce n'est pas ma faute pour le trou. Dans la région, d'autre part, il y a aussi un grand besoin de cartographie.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-06-29 22:11:52+00:00): esta calle no parece existir: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1180302642
emersonveenstra (2023-06-08 16:36:30+00:00): Hey there,

Thanks a lot for updating Marquette! Wanted to clear up a couple confusing things from this changeset so you know what to do in the future. First, with street crossings, there needs to be a line connecting the sidewalk to the street, and the crossing point goes where that line connects with the street, for example like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/46.54315/-87.39289

Also, I reverted the parts of Washington and Front back to primary. One of the important parts of road classification is that there can't be any "spurs" where a higher importance road like a Primary road ends at a lower priority road, it needs to end at the same level or higher. So if you think that Washington and Front are better classified as tertiary, you need to change them all the way to US 41. (I'm not sure they should be tertiary, since it's the main road through the downtown area, they'd most likely be primary or secondary)

Hope this helps, let me know if you have any other questions!
eggie (2023-06-07 22:07:27+00:00): Dag nl

Wat aangepast hier.
warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway  ..opgelost.
covered=yes buiten gebouw.
Adresgegevens verwijderd van gebouwomtrek.. Dat is niet correct.
landuse=residential verwijderd van gebouwomtrek.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-06-07 22:32:59+00:00): En zou dit wel routeren.. Hoe dan?

Er zijn hier toch geen aparte rijbanen.
eggie (2023-06-08 05:45:42+00:00): Volgens mij is de situatie hier veranderd. Ik heb de eenrichting omgedraaid. 
Op de meest recente PDOK  luchtfoto 2023 staan de auto's met de neus de andere kant uit.
MVG
eggie
4004 (2023-06-10 22:20:31+00:00): hi, associatedStreet is a separate relation type to street. Ignore the josm errors, but please check local mapping practices before changing relation types
marc__marc (2023-06-11 09:50:14+00:00): Hello,
thanks for the feedback.
i know the 2 types of relations. an associatedStreet relation link addr:housenumber to highway=* but here there is no addr:housenumber
Regards,
Marc
4004 (2023-06-11 22:23:39+00:00): hi Marc, in Belarus aS has been used regardless of whether there are any houses (currently) using the same street name. -4004
eggie (2023-06-07 22:25:08+00:00): Beste nl

Dit lijkt logisch, maar is verkeerd in OSM
Wanneer er geen fysieke scheiding is worden geen aparte rijbanen ingetekend.
Het aantal rijbanen word aangegeven met lanes  en de afslagen en voorsorteervakken met turn:lanes left|through|through|

Nu is dat allemaal stuk hier.
Ik draai je changeset weer terug.
eggie
eggie (2023-06-07 22:26:42+00:00): De routering is weer hersteld...  Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust.
Kijk eens goed hoe de voorgaande mapper de turn:lanes heeft toegevoegd.
eggie (2023-06-07 22:13:38+00:00): Beste nl Geef concreet aan wat je hebt aangepast svp.
Dat maakt het voor lokale mappers makkelijker om iets te controleren.

Je tagt access=destination.. Dus voor iedereen, maar daarnaast specifiek weer bicycle=yes.
Haal svp die access=destination weg, dan hoef je al die categorieën niet meer te noemen.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=137073242
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-06-07 22:15:14+00:00): Welk bord staat er vooraan de Dorpsstraat dat access=destination rechtvaardigt?
eggie (2023-06-07 22:20:27+00:00): Ik heb access=destination verwijderd. Motor_vehicle=destination zal hier wel bedoeld zijn.
Wonderlijk, want een c1 bord geld voor alles met wielen en paardenhoeven.
groet
eggie
Aim311_ (2023-08-02 20:32:19+00:00): Witam. Wygląda na to, że dodany przez ciebie obszar rekreacyjno-sportowy powinien zostać poprawiony na zgodny ze stanem widocznym na ortofotomapaie.
Aim311_ (2023-08-02 20:33:19+00:00): Przykład: 1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1180320008
2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1180320007
Aim311_ (2023-12-30 15:28:13+00:00): Landuse niezgodne z prawdą zostało usunięte.
maraf24 (2023-06-13 14:58:44+00:00): Wycofane.
maraf24 (2023-06-13 15:04:42+00:00): Jak masz uwagi - komentuj w prawidłowym zestawie.
Jeśli znajdziesz błąd poprawiaj, a nie wszczynaj wojen.
Mapowane było na podstawie tego, co w terenie. W terenie oznakowanie nie było aktywne, więc nie istniała osobna rowerowa.
maraf24 (2023-06-13 15:07:15+00:00): Na koniec: po kolejnym takim numerze  z revertem zgłaszam od razu do DWG.
Jordi MF (2023-06-07 23:00:55+00:00): Hola David,
Gràcies per millorar OSM. Una pregunta. La rotonda que has dibuixat està travessada per la carretera CV-603?
D'altra banda, si es tracta d'una rotonda típica, no has afegit que es tracta d'una rotonda "junction=roundabout". Per favor, mira't esta guia per a millorar la manera de mapejar en OSM (https://learnosm.org/es/).
Espere la teua resposta sobre com és la rotonda. Salutacions,
Jordi
Jordi MF (2023-06-07 23:02:41+00:00): Se m'oblidava afegir que les rotondes no han de dur cap nom a no ser que oficialment el tinguen. Els noms tampoc no poden descriptius, sinó oficials.
DavidCB (2023-06-08 16:01:31+00:00): Hola Jordi:
No, no està travessada, és una feina que vaig començar ahir tard i me l'havia deixada per hui. No vaig poder llevar la travessa perquè com fa temps que no modifique em costa cada vegada tindre clars tots els paràmetres.
Com és de recent creació, encara no està mapejada i l'he feta aproximada però encara s'haurà de treballar un poc més.
eggie (2023-06-07 22:31:56+00:00): reverted by changeset #137073688

Neem svp nota van het verzoek om geen aparte rijbanen te mappen.
,mvg
eggie
eggie (2023-06-07 22:38:56+00:00): Het aantal lanes is opgenomen in de weg zelf. Ht lijkt hier dan één rijbaan, maar in OSM zijn dat er twee. We tekenen er gewoon één.
Probeer je te verdiepen in de tagging van wegen en kruispunten. Niet zomaar van alles veranderen zonder enige kennis.

Zoe in de wiki eens op turn:lanes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn

en lanes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes

MVG
eggie
b-holdet (2023-07-05 12:16:11+00:00): Hi,
Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1180343170

I think the cannon should be added as a point and not as an area.

See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Ahistoric%3Dcannon
Milroy1812 (2023-07-06 14:12:13+00:00): Thanks for catching this.  I made a node for the cannon and deleted the area.  I did the same for the nearby F-4 aircraft.
nyampire (2023-06-08 07:38:24+00:00): OSMへようこそ、編集をレビューしました。

残念ながら、道路の形状を大きく間違えていたりしており、また、タグも広場に対して沼地を与えていたり、と、間違いが目立ちます。
申し訳ないのですが、巻き戻しておきます。
形状など「間違った！」と思った場合、編集をセーブせずにブラウザを閉じれば、編集を破棄できます。

また、OSMは現実に存在する地物を、あるがままにマッピングするプロジェクトです。結果的にそれがポケソースになる可能性はありますが、そのマッピングするものが実際に存在するかどうかを気にかけてください。

Happy Mapping！
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137074080
jxpsert (2023-06-08 15:01:04+00:00): What is this?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-06-10 06:06:21+00:00): "Sandbank" seems to be description of this objects, not an actual name, right?
TheSwavu (2024-11-27 08:39:29+00:00): Hi,

What is the source for the "Teralba Cemetery"? According to this https://hunterlivinghistories.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/1994-teralbacemeteryhas.pdf the site you've tagged was dedicated as a cemetery in 1894, but it was never used and the dedication was removed in 1975.

Thanks.
just_another_mapper (2023-09-08 06:01:57+00:00): Hey RYRY1002, just fyi for next time, segregated=yes indicates that pedestrians and cyclists have their own marked 'lanes' on the path. That's not the case in Prince Alfred Park, so I've changed it back to segregated=no. Cheers! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:segregated
BCNorwich (2023-06-08 05:34:53+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The untagged node has no meaning and thus is of no use to OSM, I've removed it. The Gherkin is mapped as a building here:- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4959489

Regards Bernard.
ElliottPlack (2023-06-14 01:09:58+00:00): Hi there, why was this attempted to be reverted?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-04 16:43:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165809090 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some spam by a blocked user
celamiri (2023-06-17 06:04:29+00:00): Please don't connect ways if the satellite image is unclear. I surveyed this today - there's a fence between these two sections of driveway
Necessarycoot72 (2023-06-18 03:59:57+00:00): Thanks for the correction.
Yunan973 (2023-07-31 13:05:19+00:00): Hi,

a boundary relation has to be a closed area.
I tried to fix it but I'm not sure if  the relation of Honduras is part of Siltepec or if they are 2 distincts administrative boundaries.

Could you tell me if the relations https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6000153#map=11/15.5609/-92.4173 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15948510#map=11/15.5609/-92.4166 are ok now ?

Best regards
user_5359 (2023-06-08 05:54:48+00:00): Hello! Please note that access=no means that even the owner is not allowed to use the path under any circumstances.
julcnx (2023-06-08 06:42:42+00:00): Hey sr26,
Welcome and thanks for your contributions! Just wanted to mention that I noticed you downgraded a residential segment to track. Are you familiar with the local road classifications scheme? 
You can find more info about it in this wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand
Feel free to ask any questions you may have.
Cheers,
Julien


สวัสดีคุณ sr26,
ยินดีต้อนรับและขอบคุณสำหรับความเป็นส่วนหนึ่งในการสนับสนุน! ฉันสังเกตเห็นว่าคุณลดระดับส่วนที่เป็นที่อยู่เป็นทราก คุณรู้จักการจัดประเภทถนนในพื้นที่ใช่ไหม? 
คุณสามารถหาข้อมูลเพิ่มเติมเกี่ยวกับกฎระเบียบท้องถนนท้องถิ่นได้ที่ลิงก์นี้:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand

หากคุณมีคำถามใด ๆ อย่าลังเลที่จะถามครับ.

ขอแสดงความนับถือ,
Julien
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137078360
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-08 04:30:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39236231
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1180365737

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Elisabeth IRM-RV (2023-06-27 08:15:07+00:00): Hi vietnam321,
I'm doing a validation of the Maproulette road name gap check (https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/30221) and I see that you did some road name updates, but sometimes it makes the road names inconsistent.
like on this road https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/296422008, you changed the name from Trần Nhân Tông to Lý Thái Tổ which caused 1 segment of the road to have 2 different road names.
I want to confirm if your street name changes are the latest official names.

thank you
user_6110846 (2023-06-08 05:31:14+00:00): https://t.me/DecolonizationUkraine/6915
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-08 06:23:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137080233 where the changeset comment is: See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-edits-in-italy/97706/59
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-08 06:23:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137080233 where the changeset comment is: See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-edits-in-italy/97706/59
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-08 06:23:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137080233 where the changeset comment is: See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-edits-in-italy/97706/59
nyampire (2023-06-09 05:05:30+00:00): OSMへようこそ！
編集をレビューしました。

たいへんよく描けていると思います。農道に関しては、編集いただいたとおり highway=trackが正しいタグなので、もし「ここは農道である」と確証がとれる場所であれば、既存の道路に関しても変更してしまって大丈夫です。

これからもマッピングを続けてくれると嬉しいです。
Happy Mapping！
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137079636
MxxCon (2023-06-12 23:03:29+00:00): Hello.
What are you trying to map here? A ticket counter or corporate office?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137079794
HELLOWORLDAIR (2023-06-12 23:30:08+00:00): A ticket counter and passenger helpdesk
MxxCon (2023-06-13 02:30:52+00:00): What is that phone number? It doesn't seem to belong to delta
AkuAnakTimur (2023-06-08 16:03:10+00:00): Dapat mana semua maklumat alamat rumah ni ya?
MarsyaUTM (2023-06-08 16:12:52+00:00): Greetings AkuAnakTimur! I obtained the information mostly on site, plus to be extra careful I also referred to the Google Maps pictures. I am currently near to this area as I am residing in UTM.
AkuAnakTimur (2023-06-09 03:43:21+00:00): Thanks for responding to my enquiry. I see. Please refrain cross checking with Google Maps if possible: https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright#trademarks
Глеб (2023-09-19 07:49:57+00:00): Здравствуйте!
У нас не викимапия.
Не надо придумывать названия.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-08 06:23:15+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 137079589, 137079593, 137079597, 137079624, 137079662.
EneaSuper (2023-06-08 07:40:26+00:00): Excuse me but, are there really stairs to nowhere at this point?
that_dude (2023-06-08 07:50:08+00:00): Yes, they can be seen from the train window. They probably go somewhere, not literally nowhere, but I don't know how to check that. I just mapped what was while riding the train as a passenger.
EneaSuper (2023-06-08 07:57:42+00:00): I understand, thanks for the clarification, greetings and good work!
rodolfovargas (2023-06-09 00:09:46+00:00): Hola.

Existen acumulación de aguas estancadas en las vias (ford=yes), no son permanentes, se forman por lluvias, y desaparecen en épocas secas. 
¿Cómo lo mapeo?

Fuente: imagen de aeronave UAV, disponible en OpenAerialMap, y MAPILLARY
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-16.538379160163&lng=-68.066697891667&z=17&pKey=946238679513376&focus=photo

Saludos.
NettillingLake (2023-06-12 01:02:59+00:00): Hello rodolfovargas. There are pages on the wiki that could be helpful for setting surface type https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface.  Surface tags are fairly simple regarding surface material type.  In addition to surface tags the wiki suggests smoothness=* tags can be set in addition to surface tags. This tag appears to be closer to what you are looking for https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness.  Since these are seasonal or happen intermittently it may also be worth considering setting intermittent=*  (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:intermittent) or seasonal=* (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:seasonal tags for this way.  Thank you and have a nice day. 

Translated Message

Hola rodolfo vargas. Hay páginas en el wiki que podrían ser útiles para configurar el tipo de superficie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface. Las etiquetas de superficie son bastante simples con respecto al tipo de material de superficie. Además de las etiquetas de superficie, el wiki sugiere que las etiquetas smoothness= * se pueden establecer además de las etiquetas surface=. Esta etiqueta parece estar más cerca de lo que estás buscando https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness. Dado que estos son estacionales o ocurren de manera intermitente, también puede valer la pena considerar establecer intermittent= (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:intermittent) o estacional = *(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:seasonal etiquetas para este camino. Gracias y que tengas un buen día.
eggie (2023-06-08 09:01:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
ianlopez1115 (2023-06-10 17:21:45+00:00): Only one portion of P. Alcantara Street (way 34049579) can be tagged as foot=no since there are nearby pedestrian crossings, rest of P. Alcantara Street can be traversed on foot despite the lack of sidewalks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137080443
ianlopez1115 (2023-06-12 02:31:22+00:00): foot=no tags were removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137224590
Protoxenus (2023-12-17 16:04:46+00:00): Bevor du hier etwas "Neues" kartierst, ist es angebracht, mal zu gucken, ob das nicht schon jemand vor dir getan hat. Es ist extrem unwahrscheinlich, dass dieser Brunnen bis dahin von allen anderen Mappern übersehen wurde.
Gruß Protoxenus
Andrew Kvalheim (2023-06-09 03:24:39+00:00): I think this might be on the wrong building. This building looks like it’s in the same lot as 417 N 87th St.
celamiri (2023-06-17 05:51:13+00:00): Good catch - the ADU is missing from the map. Added it and reverted the change to this one.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137435439
maraf24 (2023-06-17 18:06:14+00:00): Ze zdjęć wynika, że Kaparową nie da się legalnie dojechać do przedszkola. Tak ma być?
Mirosław Żylewicz (2023-06-18 15:45:56+00:00): To jest jedyna droga dojazdowa do budynków przy ulicy Melisowej. Gdyby nie ona to budynki przy ul. Melisowej zostały by odcięte od reszty miasta.

Zakaz wjazdu na ulicę Kaparową został zdjęty i przeniesiony na pobocze. Droga jest przejezdna o czym świadczy kolejny znak z nakazem jazdy w prawo przy zjeździe z ul. Kaparowej na ul. Melisową.

Poniżej aktualna mapa poglądowa:
https://i.ibb.co/99kZGhk/geoportal-gov2.png

Plany budowy nowych dróg:
https://gazetawroclawska.pl/kilometr-nowych-drog-powstanie-we-wroclawiu-znamy-ich-przebieg-wizualizacje/ar/c1-17359277

https://www.wroclaw.pl/inwestycje-wroclaw/budowa-drog-na-osiedlu-lipa-piotrowska-i-widawa-we-wroclawiu
5m4u9 (2023-06-09 16:50:11+00:00): Hi, although they are for public use, it is not likely that anyone can freely use these service roads.
NettillingLake (2023-06-12 01:42:46+00:00): Hello 5m5u9. I set the barrier=gate features (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10962965614, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10962965612, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10962965613) to private to match the modeling that was already on the parent ways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052325272 in your 2022 changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119798940. I also noticed this fence polygon (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/974502613) had private tags and there is ground imagery (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=994782714643432) here I interpreted as private residential access for these apartments. 

Thank you for your input on these. If you have any additional guidance on mapping features in Cochabamba, I would always welcome that! Best.
5m4u9 (2023-06-12 18:37:23+00:00): Hi, I think that those garage entrances are better mapped on the wall (node intersection between driveway and wall polygon).
NettillingLake (2023-06-13 05:22:35+00:00): Hello 5m4u9. I have updated those gates to the fence as you have suggested.  Thank you for the feedback and have a good day.
silversurfer83 (2023-06-08 14:03:25+00:00): Moin :)

sicher, dass hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196825934) keine Brücke ist?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137081738
Knüllwälder (2023-06-09 06:42:20+00:00): moin,

die Brücke ist doch noch da, 
siehe 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/221949649

der kurze Weg zur Brücke wurde lediglich hinzugefügt.

Gruß
silversurfer83 (2023-06-09 20:28:53+00:00): Ah. Sorry. Danke für die Klärung :)
cats_pajamas (2023-06-14 21:42:38+00:00): Hello, I noticed that you added access=private tagging to a few highways near Universitas Gadjah Mada. Most of these additions look great, however, there are a few I’d like to ask you about.

You added access=private to a few primary/tertiary highway segments (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/720538477, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768435005, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101932074). Based on the OSM Wiki page for access=private (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate), features with this tag should not be used by the general public, and access is only granted on an individual basis. I have looked through the available ground-level imagery in both Mapillary and KartaView, and I do not see any indication that those ways should be tagged as access=private. I’m wondering why you added this tag, as well as what resource you utilized.

Looking forward to hearing from you!
GrabID_Utami Gendis (2023-06-20 04:31:14+00:00): Hi! Thank you for you correcting me. I realize I add access=private in some higher class road while it should be on lower class road since UGM is campus and some area are limited to college student and their civic academy only. Now, I've better understanding I'll remove access=private on this higher class road. Thank you
cats_pajamas (2023-06-22 16:16:04+00:00): Thank you for your response as well as your edits here! They are much appreciated. Happy mapping!