piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
1Raven (2026-05-18 07:35:01+00:00): Hey, no, the individual residential zones I mapped are based of survey information [https://apps.vertigisstudio.com/web/?app=6f461ff64e264993912557f79896b9a9].

If this is incorrect I can update it to be more general, to be honest I was thinking of doing so.
eggie (2026-05-15 05:56:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Tips De format van additional phone number is niet valide.. phone begint met +31..
De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
pesticides (2026-05-15 05:21:17+00:00): Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#City_of_Shoreline,_Washington, Local Knowledge, Aerial Imagery
pesticides (2026-05-15 05:21:23+00:00): Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#City_of_Shoreline,_Washington, Local Knowledge, Aerial Imagery
pesticides (2026-05-15 05:21:25+00:00): Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#City_of_Shoreline,_Washington, Local Knowledge, Aerial Imagery
pesticides (2026-05-15 05:28:48+00:00): Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#City_of_Shoreline,_Washington, Local Knowledge, Aerial Imagery
pesticides (2026-05-15 05:43:13+00:00): Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#City_of_Shoreline,_Washington, Local Knowledge, Aerial Imagery
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-15 05:58:39+00:00): #Spam
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-15 05:59:03+00:00): #Spam
pesticides (2026-05-15 05:50:24+00:00): Sources: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#City_of_Shoreline,_Washington, Local Knowledge, Aerial Imagery
pesticides (2026-05-15 06:05:27+00:00): Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#City_of_Shoreline,_Washington, Local Knowledge, Aerial Imagery
pesticides (2026-05-15 06:31:40+00:00): Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#City_of_Shoreline,_Washington, Local Knowledge, Aerial Imagery
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-05-15 06:14:34+00:00): Oh, and also: https://maps.clarkcountynv.gov/assessor/parcelmap/mapfiles/map137217.pdf
pesticides (2026-05-15 06:31:41+00:00): Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#City_of_Shoreline,_Washington, Local Knowledge, Aerial Imagery
TrickyFoxy (2026-06-30 20:23:49+00:00): Здесь действительно родник? https://osm.org/node/13830217701
tux67 (2026-05-15 15:19:53+00:00): Hi, 
welche Schreibweise steht auf dem Straßenschild? mit "-" oder ohne?
Beim Open Data Geoportal der Stadt Mönchengladbach heißt es "Am SMS-Campus" aber letztendlich zählt bei OSM die On-the-ground Regel:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Dinge_so_kartieren,_wie_sie_in_der_Realit%C3%A4t_sind

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182681153
pesticides (2026-05-15 06:31:43+00:00): Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#City_of_Shoreline,_Washington, Local Knowledge, Aerial Imagery
eggie (2026-05-15 15:41:12+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.
I merged your info with the present addressnode.

Greetz,
eggie
SekeRob (2026-05-15 18:15:17+00:00): Hi,

Am going to revert all your excessive simplifications of area outlines. Refine, OK, not the other way around.
BTW for a simple tree row you draw single line and tag is as natural=tree_row, not a box.
For current imagery, Mapbox 2026 is advised to verify if landuse, buildings, what not have not changed. Finding many cases where Bing proofs to be substantially outdated.

Happy Mapping.
SekeRob
mueschel (2026-05-17 17:27:41+00:00): Hi,
I see that you added the network-dependent names of bus stops. This can get a bit messy because e.g. special characters are needed or abbreviations can't be distinguished from language codes. Recently "name:network:XYZ" came into use, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:network:*

It might be a good idea to use this here as well.
setowalker (2026-05-18 08:46:08+00:00): Now I changed tags of the relations thanks for your helpful comment.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-15 07:31:29+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/687562949

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mavl (2026-06-07 06:01:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183764451, 183764460, 183764431, 183764453, 183764448, 183764459, 183764455 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20768].
Kugelbaum (2026-05-15 16:53:29+00:00): Vläit iwwerleeën am viraus, wou een en Haus keeft? Fänkt u pénibel ze ginn. Dir wësst schon, datt et net all ze schwéier ass am klenge Land rauszefannen wien dir sidd?
Aim311_ (2026-06-19 20:26:50+00:00): Cześć. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1513922975 namapujemy ściżek technologicznych z powodu ich sezonowości.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-20 06:14:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1513922976/history - to są ślady traktora na polu po tym jak pryskał itp

nie mapujemy tego
OlasMapy (2026-06-25 15:42:56+00:00): orto tak pokazywało to zmapowałem
OlasMapy (2026-06-25 15:43:18+00:00): ale dzięki za uwagę
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-26 09:16:07+00:00): > orto tak pokazywało to zmapowałem

no jak najbardziej je na orto widać, w terenie też - tyle że nie są to drogi
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-16 07:23:26+00:00): HTML/iframe injection attempting JavaScript execution via OSM tag.

Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182686210
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-15 08:55:18+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
are the following names real?
0269 (1513926333), v1
east north start point (1260442304), v4
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-02 07:04:17+00:00): Reverted addition of apparently online-only SEO-spam business

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183530956
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-16 07:23:43+00:00): HTML/iframe injection attempting JavaScript execution via OSM tag.

Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182686718
PizzaTreeIsland (2026-05-15 09:04:30+00:00): Hello, 
thank you for adding all those trees. 

Please note that natural=tree is only supposed to be used on single nodes, not on ways or areas. I fixed this by replacing your tree ways with individual nodes already. 

Thank you and happy mapping!
World_Winner (2026-05-15 09:13:45+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 182686555
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-15 09:01:26+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/687562919
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/687562923
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/687562949
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106911679

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-16 07:28:27+00:00): HTML/iframe injection attempting JavaScript execution via OSM tag.

Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182700287
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-16 07:28:38+00:00): HTML/iframe injection attempting JavaScript execution via OSM tag.

Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182700287
eggie (2026-05-15 15:06:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Camerashop hebik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-05-15 15:07:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-05-15 15:10:56+00:00): Wat was je bedoeling? 
Dit lijkt nou niet op een nuttige aanvulling. Ik draai je wijziging weer terug.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-05-15 15:12:11+00:00): reverted by changeset #182703912
osmviborg (2026-05-15 09:22:05+00:00): Du tegner mængder af separate cykelstier  uden at checke om der er tagget cykelsti på vejen som dine cykelstier løber langs. Det giver en masse dubleringer af cykelstier. Ryd venligst op.
osmviborg (2026-05-15 09:31:00+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway
sandraev (2026-05-15 09:37:20+00:00): Hi! Thanks a lot for checking after me! Indeed I might have missed some road tagging, that's my bad... 😬 I'll correct that now. Next time I'll try not to make such huge changesets, that'll help avoiding such mistakes.
osmviborg (2026-05-15 09:40:52+00:00): 👍
sandraev (2026-05-15 09:48:16+00:00): Hopefully it's way better now. Don't hesitate to tell me if you spot other mistakes 🫶
aTarom (2026-05-15 13:57:43+00:00): Hola, se revierten las ediciones de tu usuario, para pruebas dispones de servidor específico
https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-16 07:29:05+00:00): HTML/iframe injection attempting JavaScript execution via OSM tag.

Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182700287

Thanks @aTarom
Sébastien Pi (2026-05-22 07:47:09+00:00): Bonjour,

Je viens de remarquer vos notes.
Par contre https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1513932621/history n’est pas un parking_aisle.
Il y a une confusion très fréquente : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle#D%C3%A9sambigu%C3%AFsation (parking_aisle serait ici une voie perpendiculaire à celle-ci qui ne mène qu’à des places de stationnement, c’est rare en dehors de centres commerciaux ou autre équipés de grosses zones de stationnement). Ici, c’est une voie de service traversante de rue à rue.

Merci pour les contributions !
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-15 09:31:35+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/809931632

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
_klaas_ (2026-05-27 14:22:02+00:00): Hallo, du hast das voltage tag der Nord-Süd-Leitung von 0;0 auf 380000 geändert. Sowohl das nördliche, als auch das südliche Ende sind, wenn man Straßenfotos aus dem Jahre 2025 heranzieht, nicht mit dem übrigen Leitungsnetz verbunden.

Viele Grüße
Klaas
bahnpirat (2026-06-03 12:29:09+00:00): Ich habe hier eingetragen, was die Leitungsinfrastruktur technisch in der Lage wäre zu leisten, an hand der Isolatorenlänge. Aber du darfst es gerne ändern.
mini-me (2026-05-16 09:39:18+00:00): Здравствуйте. А для чего вы восстановили этот округ?
Yehudah777 (2026-05-18 15:15:05+00:00): Добрый день. Для того, чтобы территория ссылалась на район (Кстовский район есть в уставе, на офсайте города). Я так понимаю, его удалили, потому что он не является административно-территориальной единицей (по открытым источникам), поэтому, чтобы не было конфликта, сделал его историческим
mini-me (2026-05-18 15:53:46+00:00): Кстовский район - это единица административно-территориального деления, а у нас адресация по муниципальному. До 2025 года он соответствовал Кстовскому муниципальному округу, но теперь это часть городской округа Нижний Новгород.
В ОСМ не принято хранить исторические данные, но если оно вам для чего-то очень нужно, то стоит хотя бы исключить его из отношения.
LordGarySugar (2026-05-20 15:48:47+00:00): Hi, I have made some modifications to the tagging you've used to represent these private paths - it is not appropriate to name them 'PRIVATE LAND - NO TRESPASSING'. Instead, just changing them to access=private, removing foot=yes and changing horse=yes to horse=no/private is sufficient to convey the access allowed here. access=no should only be used if it is physically impossible to use these paths. Regardless, all the paths you intended to mark as private are now correctly recorded as such. I will also send a comment to the person who removed the private tags that you added previously. If you have any further questions or need help feel free to ask.
duncandonut (2026-05-20 17:18:04+00:00): Hello, this is incredibly helpful.  I’m so grateful you have spent the time and effort to correct my mistakes and to have written to me.  Would you like to run the country? We could do with more people like you! It’s my first time on Open Street Map and I appreciate that it aims to show all paths for emergency access purposes at the very least.  My concerns were raised when I received a map made via LandApp which showed the private paths as PRoWs.  They had based their information on OSM.  The dotted lines shown there were read as PRoWs incorrectly.  Dogs have been chasing cattle and ground nesting birds from a fragile habitat.  I am very grateful for your guidance and I am sorry for my errors, I aimed to make the situation clear.

Are you the owner of OSM or just a very kind contributor?  I may need your help again if people change the status again! Kind regards
LordGarySugar (2026-05-22 03:04:30+00:00): Haha, thanks for your kind words. Yes I would like to run the country 😆. You're right that private paths shouldn't be deleted, for the reasons you mention. I've also found it useful when hiking to know which paths you can't turn down, too. Hopefully (it may take some time) the tag changes filter down to LandApp and other map services show that these paths are private. There are some maps which may show private paths the same as public paths, there is of course nothing we can do about that. As for people changing them back to access=permissive, they might do this if there are no signs indicating that they are private. If there are signs or locked gates, it would of course be wrong to change these back to access=private.

As for being an owner of, OSM, no. It's a non-profit, so there isn't really an owner, just an elected Board. I'm just a regular contributor who saw the notes you created, and wanted to make sure the map accurately represents reality. Thanks for being understanding, and I hope that clears some things up :)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-02 07:14:41+00:00): Reverted SEO spam addition of service business name and nonsense tagging to large variety store

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183531341
tux67 (2026-05-15 15:05:15+00:00): Hi,

with this changeset you have duplicated data for the same OSM element. 
Same church - 2 times amenity=place_of_worship and wikidata=Q125279130
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13144927030
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173896967
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#One_feature,_one_OSM_element
Change will be partly reverted.
BR
tux67
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182689692
Pernycek (2026-05-17 16:47:44+00:00): Hi, thanks for the heads-up. I'll keep the "one feature, one OSM element" rule in mind for my future edits. Best regards!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-02 07:09:41+00:00): Reverted addition of possible Google copyvio SEO spam building and duplicate POI not matching imagery with malformed tagging

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183531142
joost schouppe (2026-05-19 07:42:40+00:00): Based on this description, you could just remove the amenity tag completely. Based on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:healthcare=psychotherapist, there is no obligation to have any extra tags
Alexia Schoonjans (2026-06-04 20:09:02+00:00): Je l'ai corrigé mais il n'apparaît plus sur la carte… Pourtant, quand je clique sur le nom ici ou quand j'édite il est toujours là. Est-ce correct ???
joost schouppe (2026-06-05 08:40:12+00:00): Oui, ça peut se passer! Pas tous les tags sont montré sur tous les cartes basés sur les données. Ca apparaitra toujours dans un recherche sur le nom ou pour des therapeutes. Peut-etre ce n'est pas fautif de l'indiquer avec office=yes ou quelque chose comme ça, qui est bien plus souvent montré sur les cartes...
Mickael S (2026-05-21 11:12:59+00:00): Hi (sorry, I am not fluent enough in German to write it), I am a bit confused with the 2 plaque (the rosa winkel one, and the pink triangle) situation. On all pictures I found, they are on the same wall, but on the map, they are not. Isn't it a problem, or is there something I miss ?
Groebel (2026-05-21 13:55:28+00:00): Hello and thanks for the tip. As far as I recall, they are on the same wall, one to the left of the station entrance, however, and the other to the right
Mickael S (2026-05-21 16:19:59+00:00): But so, I see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13830513696 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4753705052 . 

Which one correspond to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q139882581 ? 

(For some reason, I tought that "Rosa winkel" was the name of someone, and not the german translation of "pink triangle" when I posted my 1st message...)
Zkir (2026-05-17 12:24:35+00:00): Hi Ivan, 

It should be `Prunus cerasus` not `Prunus cesarus` IMHO :)
ika-chan! (2026-05-15 10:51:43+00:00): Hello, we don't delete private roads, we instead tag them as access=private to block public access: please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property for more information.
Quasimodo (2026-05-15 12:02:15+00:00): Thats my failure then. Thanks for the hint and sorry. But what is to do now? This footway would going directly across a building?
Quasimodo (2026-05-15 12:17:26+00:00): Ok, thanks for repair it. I have read this article about private roads and will remember it in future.
Bienson (2026-05-16 03:00:02+00:00): Hallo,

Außerhalb von Gebäude liegende Gebäudeteile sind nicht sinnvoll.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building:part

Übereinanderliegende Gebäudeteile ebenso.

Vordächer sind einfach building=roof.

Die Tiefgarage ist deutlich größer - die Umrisse sind in der Kartenebene NRW Liegenschaftskataster zu sehen.
neri_ (2026-05-16 07:55:14+00:00): Gute Einwände. Schau ich mir die nächsten paar Tage nochmal an
neri_ (2026-05-28 15:18:01+00:00): Die Gebäudeteile liegen nicht im Grundriss des Gebäudes und sind zum Großteil "überhängend". Den Grundriss des Gebäudes deswegen größer zu machen als er in Wirklichkeit ist ist fand ich keine gute Lösung.
Ich habe die building:parts deswegen jetzt wie auch im Wiki beschrieben als Relation ans Gebäude verknüpft.

Die Tiefgarage hab ich vergrößert
Bienson (2026-06-01 20:57:24+00:00): Überhängende Teile eines Gebäudes gehören auch zum Umriss. Gebäudeteil kann dann mit building:min_level=* getaggt werden.

Relation macht so keinen Sinn - outline-Rolle, die nicht alle Gebäudeteile umschließt, Tiefgarage als Gebäudeteil. Sehe generell nicht den Mehrwert einer Gebäuderelation.

Weiterhin nicht vom Gebäude umschlossene Gebäudeteile vorhanden, z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1524065402/, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1513946604/, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1513946613/ und übereinanderliegende Gebäudeteile, z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1513946604/, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1513946603/

Generell ist auch Salzbrunnstraße 18-22 ein einzelnes Gebäude, nicht mehrere (siehe https://www.tim-online.nrw.de/tim-online2/ und suche nach einer der Adressen).

Als Beispiel für ein Gebäude mit eingetragenen Gebäudeteilen:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1300361942
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-15 11:14:28+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the following name real?
Via Re Martino 237 (29986277), v21
MatteoSpot (2026-05-15 13:48:35+00:00): Buongiorno,
avevamo utilizzato quel nome temporaneamente in attesa che il nostro contatto ci fornisse la titolarità della tabaccheria.
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-15 13:50:58+00:00): Partly Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182692247
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-15 13:51:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182694604

Thanks.
GiovanniPen (2026-05-17 18:48:10+00:00): Ciao Matteo, ma ci fornisse a chi? comunque avevi messo il civico nel nome della strada
MatteoSpot (2026-05-18 09:31:31+00:00): Che fornisse a NOI, la titolarità corretta della tabaccheria, per inserirlo in piattaforma.
GiovanniPen (2026-05-18 14:26:42+00:00): sì ok, ripeto la domanda. "noi" chi? 😅
MatteoSpot (2026-05-18 14:42:36+00:00): Al nostro ufficio.
GiovanniPen (2026-05-18 20:04:10+00:00): ok. che ufficio? di cosa vi occupate? operi su osm quindi per conto di un'azienda e non per conto tuo personale (?)
MatteoSpot (2026-05-19 08:12:17+00:00): Ciao Giovanni, l'azienda è mia, fino a poco tempo fa gestivo un sito (Skin) per il gioco online grazie a un concessionario di Siena. Con le nuove normative (il settore lo hanno messo in mano a pochi) purtroppo i concessionari non possono più avere Skin e automaticamente siamo diventati dei semplici collaboratori. Siccome ho 2 dipendenti sto cercando di mantenere il supporto e rapporto con i clienti (Punti Vendita Ricariche) e i miei collaboratori. Siccome sono un appassionato dell'informatica mi sono creato con l'aiuto dell'AI una dashboard con la mappa di OpenStreetMap per avere una visione dei nostri punti e dei nostri collaboratori e mi sembrava anche un modo per dare un contributo alla community di OSM. Mi dispiace se ci sono stati degli errori. Grazie per le dritte e buona giornata
GiovanniPen (2026-05-20 09:35:50+00:00): non ti preoccupare degli errori, sbagliando si impara. se hai dubbi chiedi pure. grazie per i tuoi contributi ;)
grzegorz75jan (2026-05-15 13:03:55+00:00): Do edycji używaj podkładów z geoportalu bo Bing lubi mieć kiepską kalibrację i nie przypinaj drogi do budynku.
woodpeck (2026-05-15 11:43:18+00:00): Dear sopihie_fah, could you explain your process in creating these buildings? Unusually, they have all been created as multipolygon relations with one member only, which is not how we normally draw buildings. Did you draw these buildings by hand in the editor or did you use something else?
theredbluecube2 (2026-05-17 15:10:52+00:00): Ура, я не единый маппер в Брянске!
Takuto (2026-06-24 15:12:30+00:00): Привет. Я маплю в Брянске в основном потому, что домики, которые когда-то кто-то накопипастил как попало, меня раздражают. К сожалению, не могу проверить на местности многие адреса из ЕГРН, которые бьют дома на две части (вроде 16 и 16А). Возможно, на самом деле это один и тот же дом 16. Таких мест в Брянске довольно много.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-15 12:21:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/585757695

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
KennyDap (2026-05-15 23:11:12+00:00): 이 공항들은 존재하지 않습니다. 왜 목록에 추가된 거죠???
KennyDap (2026-05-15 23:13:02+00:00): Removing non-existent added objects

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182720736
KoreaElliotz125 (2026-05-16 07:54:33+00:00): Shut up KennyDap
KoreaElliotz125 (2026-05-16 07:55:23+00:00): They are few of them not-using but please stop
KennyDap (2026-05-16 22:50:31+00:00): What do you mean, "Shut up"? How are you talking to me? There were obviously no airports in the locations shown on the maps, so there's no need to draw them where there aren't any.
KoreaElliotz125 (2026-05-17 02:54:37+00:00): Check satellite photo at 37°16'53.81"N 126°48'08.57"E. Can you see the airplanes??
You should check multiple sources before deleting other people's work. Very much appreciated.
PizzaTreeIsland (2026-05-15 11:59:40+00:00): Hello Tommy, 
thank you for adding these trees. In the future, please note that natural=tree is only supposed to be used on individual nodes, not on areas or ways. I fixed this already by replacing a tree area by two nodes for the individual trees. 

Thank you and happy mapping!
woodpeck (2026-05-15 11:52:07+00:00): Dear sopol63681, please provide proper changeset comments when uploading your edits, not just ".". Thank you.