piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
limes11 (2023-09-13 18:54:30+00:00): Hi, 

danke für die Eintragung!

Unter name werden nur tatsächliche Eigennamen erfasst, keine beschreibenden Begriffe.

Wie ist dieser Weg denn vor Ort beschildert? 

Schöne Grüße, Limes
augil (2023-09-13 17:24:45+00:00): mahallelerin resmi ismi yazması yeterlidir.
Dimitar155 (2025-02-01 10:45:16+00:00): Hi tbi1233,

Are you sure about the Western Union node? Isn't it a money transfer place or change bureau?

Happy mapping,
Dimitar
tbi1233 (2025-02-01 17:23:11+00:00): Yes, you are right. I don't know how I managed to add it as a bank.
Frans S (2023-09-16 14:41:28+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.
H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing into the mapping.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141222831
Frans S (2023-09-16 14:41:41+00:00): Hello again.  FYI
This is how to map building with courtyards .

 1   Draw the outer outline of the building as an area. Tag as a building
 2  Draw each of the inner courtyards/plazas as areas. Tag as needed, or not at all
 3  Hold 'SHIFT' and select all the areas
 4  Press 'C' to create a multipolygon with all the areas
 Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141222831
gscholz (2023-09-14 07:01:11+00:00): Hi Felipe_lipeh,
this changeset has created errors regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-64.30952&lat=-8.85264&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
mariotomo (2023-09-22 09:02:05+00:00): cuando una calle termina a una pared, o de otra manera queda sin salida, pero muy cerca de otra calle, para evitar dudas pueden añadir un noexit=yes al nodo terminal de la calle sin salida.
SHARCRASH (2023-09-18 13:02:41+00:00): Hi KBLux! Good to see you back on OSM. 

I noticed you added the surface as "wood" for some paths. This value is intended for wood planks installed usually on structures, walkway planks, etc so inherently not natural, considered as a "paved" surface somehow flat and not loose. There is also the value "woodchips" made of relatively tiny pieces (chips) of wood or bark. Subjectively/arguably, I'd say can be also expressed for multiple pieces of natural chopped branches. Foresters put these on tracks to avoid too much erosion of the ground and other reasons. Wouldn't use it though for hole large branches/trunks which can rather be considered as barrier=log.

Anyway, more info here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface on each dedicate page for the value.
KBLux (2023-09-20 18:31:23+00:00): Thanks SHARCRASH.  Not sure that ‘surface’ actually captures it then. The paths I added are rough logging tracks, so passable on foot through the ‘woods’ or forest, but very rough. Should I use ‘tracktype=Grade5’ instead?
SHARCRASH (2023-09-20 21:33:58+00:00): Long time i haven't passed there. If the ways are for forestry vehicles even with logs (unless there are shrubs that have grown on the way), indeed track is more relevant and tracktype=grade5 expresses very rough ways with very loose (rolling material) soft (mud, sand) or dense grasses. Keep in mind that grade5 is the worst, there is no grade6. :) It can be subjective and variable depending of external factors so usually if someone is mistaken by one grade I think we can stay open minded. For example a track having a surface with dirt not used very often can be prone to become a grade5 made of mud if it rains but if its driven often and very hard compacted in summer it can be considered a grade3.

For the logs, if they can prevent passage for forestry vehicles, which are usually specialised 4WD vehicles, I'd suggest to add barrier=log. Again can be variable, a small trunk 15cm thick on direct contact with the ground no, but if it is suspended high, yes. If there are multiple preventing passage but the way can roughly still be used for any reason, add few barrier=log tags spaced by a certain distance to express there a re a few logs, no need to add all of them (copy/paste helps going faster). If they recover completely the way that it becomes even very hard for a pedestrian to use it, you can add access=no (cannot physically go through it). Cut the way if it's only  aportion. Possibly foresters have done it in purpose. See
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Introductory_examples

Example of grade5 with some small logs but no need to add barrier=log since they don't prevent passage
https://drive.google.com/file/d/18Y9mpFcb4kvmWl4mJAsyZ2mnL7Tj0D0S

Hope this helps! Anyway, you're welcome!
Ferrocarriles de México (2023-09-15 01:50:42+00:00): Ya estaba mapeado y no es una represa.
Swic (2023-11-13 11:32:30+00:00): Bonjour, pouvez-vous m'indiquer pourquoi le chemin 327118828 (chemin Ploumodiern) est tagué comme interdit d'accès ? Merci.
CharlieOuest (2023-11-26 20:01:48+00:00): Bonjour,
De mémoire, il y avait une signalétique interdisant l'accès lorsque je suis passé cet été. Peut être une question de sécurité. Il a peut être été réouvert depuis. Bonne soirée.
empty_child (2023-09-13 18:54:15+00:00): Hello Pacha Tchernof,
It's better to use 1-я улица Гуджарети instead of 1-я Гуджаретская улица (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39131470) to save consistency in pronunciation between Georgian and Russian
Also, during editing street names, please, follow community guidelines about naming (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Georgia_Abkhazia_South-Ossetia#Names%20conventions)
Pacha Tchernof (2023-09-13 21:06:20+00:00): Hello empty_child,
What is the reason(s) for saving consistency in pronunciation between Georgian and Russian? Could you please explain in detail?
empty_child (2023-09-13 21:47:54+00:00): It's a little trick: for a Russian-speaking person it doesn't matter, Гуджарети or Гуджаретская. But for a Georgian-speaking, it can be a problem to understand what happens. And community decided to save balance and consistency between three main language (ka, ru, en) in the region
jmsbert (2023-12-30 17:17:57+00:00): Olá Aline,
obrigado por contribuir com esse projeto humanitário em Muçum. Apesar de já terem se passado várias semanas, quero lhe dar um feedback, que você solicitou. Como você adicionou tags muito específicas aos edifícios (como building:levels=2), presumo que você tenha conhecimento local.

Vou me concentrar nos aspectos que você pode melhorar para mapeamentos futuros.
- você adicionou áreas marcadas com "natural=scrub". Embora isso não tenha sido solicitado nas instruções deste projeto, em geral não há problema em mapear outras coisas também. Tome cuidado para evitar nós compartilhados entre os contornos de construção e o uso do solo.  Isso ajuda a modificar os edifícios posteriormente com mais facilidade. Pelo mesmo motivo, é prática comum não conectar edifícios e rodovias. A organização MissingMaps criou um vídeo sobre esse tópico: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141224468
jmsbert (2023-12-30 17:18:21+00:00): Você criou uma piscina (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207544958#map=19/-29.17003/-51.87630), mas excluiu essa piscina (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778375239) ao mesmo tempo. Em vez de excluir, é uma boa prática no OpenStreetMap manter o histórico dos objetos para dar crédito aos antigos colaboradores. Isso pode ser feito movendo o objeto anterior para a nova posição e arrastando os nós para as posições corretas. Tentarei restaurar o histórico do objeto nesse caso.


Além disso, o objeto leisure=swimming_pool deve ser usado somente para a área coberta pela água, mas não para a área pavimentada ao redor, consulte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool
Por fim, a tag "access=private" deve ser adicionada às piscinas que estão em um terreno privado para evitar confusão.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141224468
jmsbert (2023-12-30 17:20:59+00:00): Com relação aos edifícios que você adicionou, lembre-se de enquadrar os objetos, pois normalmente os edifícios têm cantos de 90°. Isso pode ser feito facilmente pressionando a tecla "q" no teclado quando o objeto é selecionado. Há um vídeo instrutivo disponível aqui: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o

Você atribuiu a tag "landuse=residential" a https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207544976. Isso parece estranho para mim, pois eu teria esperado a tag "building=residential" em vez disso. "landuse=residential" destina-se a marcar (maior) uma área de terra com predominância de edifícios residenciais, mas não cada propriedade individualmente, consulte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential

Se tiver alguma dúvida, terei prazer em ajudá-lo. Continue mapeando - todas as contribuições são muito apreciadas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141224468
rskedgell (2023-09-13 19:37:02+00:00): Why would an alpine refuge in Iceland have names in English and Spanish, names which look more like descriptions?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11188849137
mcliquid (2023-09-14 11:04:41+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Pablo Strubell (2024-08-29 07:47:07+00:00): Sorry for my late reply. The refuge has no name. I made mistake and added description to the name. Sorry
AgusQui (2023-09-21 03:14:38+00:00): what? En que te basas para hacer este cambio?
aaronq227 (2023-09-21 21:20:50+00:00): Traducción automática

Hola AgusQui, gracias por comunicarte. Agregué un sentido unidireccional a lo largo de esta calle residencial ya que hay un letrero de no ingresar en imágenes recientes de Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-34.6504128&lng=-58.604915800003&z=17&pKey=1249689109218614&focus=photo&x=0.5140413863921481&y=0.47193581249514605&zoom=0.12272251674107143) que restringe a los conductores dirigirse hacia el sur. Parece apropiado incluir aquí un sentido único para evitar que el tráfico vaya en la dirección equivocada.

Hi AgusQui, thank you for reaching out. I added a oneway along this residential road as there is a do not enter sign in recent Mapillary imagery (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-34.6504128&lng=-58.604915800003&z=17&pKey=1249689109218614&focus=photo&x=0.5140413863921481&y=0.47193581249514605&zoom=0.12272251674107143) that restricts drivers from heading south. It seems appropriate to include a oneway here to prevent traffic from heading the wrong direction.
AgusQui (2023-09-22 13:10:03+00:00): Ok gracias, ahí encontré el decreto del municipio, tengo que corregir el recorrido de la línea 242
aaronq227 (2023-09-22 18:52:12+00:00): Traducción automática
De nada y gracias también por la información.

You're welcome and thanks for the information.
Yunkers (2023-09-15 11:55:48+00:00): Where did you get this road name from?
VLD157 (2023-09-15 14:41:22+00:00): Hi Yunkers, 
The road name was added in changeset 140541024 by user Tytko; I had only reverted the removal of the road (Removed in changeset 140773674) since it is visible in imagery. Thanks for reaching out and I hope that Tytko is able to help answer your question.
Awoobis (2023-09-15 23:08:42+00:00): Bro that's self-insert name of the user. A k.a garbage

If you need confrimation you can select layer -> Geoportal2: street names / nazwy ulic and look at it
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-16 10:46:17+00:00): skasowałem nazwę

jak wycofujesz "  usunięcie wymyślonej ulicy  " to zwróć uwagę czy bubli nie przywracasz
VLD157 (2023-09-18 16:29:09+00:00): Thank you both for reaching out. I appreciate the advice of using the Geoportal2: street names / nazwy ulic layer as a reference in the future. I will be more careful about such situations going forward.
user_5359 (2023-09-14 06:23:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note thatn OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.

I modify your entry to an address node
easbar (2024-06-16 20:22:44+00:00): Hier ist eine turn relation kaputt gegangen. Dort fehlt jetzt der 'from' member: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16615
leider gibt iD in solchen Fällen keine Warnung o.ä. aus: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/9346
Mal abgesehen davon müsste die via node dieser Restriktion wohl eher https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/269774196 sein und statt 'only_right_turn' würde 'no_left_turn' hier besser passen.
Jordi MF (2023-09-13 19:51:17+00:00): Hola Ferher,
Gracias por mejorar OSM, pero ten cuidad a la hora de añadir los nombres de los comercios.

En OSM los nombres descriptivos no son correctos. Si quieres describir que se trata de una frutería (algo innecesario porque la etiqueta "shop=greengrocer" ya lo indica), puedes usar la etiqueta "description=*". Pero como nombre debes poner el nombre oficial del comercio.

Saludos,
Jordi
Awoobis (2023-09-13 22:32:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226513628/history tam jest znak postawiony, zakaz wjazdu oprócz mieszkańców...
Awoobis (2023-09-13 22:33:57+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1348272186096152 foto
b-jazz (2023-10-14 00:55:45+00:00): Can you take a look at https://osm.org/way/384638461? It seems to zig-zag and cross all over itself, and that goes against basic mapping rules. If you could clean that up, it would be appreciated. Thanks.
zluuzki (2023-10-15 18:00:06+00:00): thanks for letting me know.
I apparently drew that but forgot to split it and add the proper cables/circuits tags.

fixed it now.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-09-14 01:52:40+00:00): boa noite. quando não é um nome proprio, melhor deixar sem nome, como deixou "obra abandonada"
davidraposo (2023-09-14 11:33:34+00:00): Obrigado pela dica.
VA00 (2024-07-31 07:52:58+00:00): Czy tam rzeczywiście da się wejść? De facto lub/i de iure?
m_p_13 (2024-07-31 08:53:21+00:00): De facto tak.
De iure teren firmy (prywatny?), ale płotu nie uświadczysz.
Ścieżki na szczyt wydeptane, ślady rowerów i motocrossów także widać.
gscscnd (2024-10-03 19:01:27+00:00): Ktoś zlikwidował:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157410499
https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#157410499
felipeeugenio (2023-09-13 20:46:31+00:00): Hola.
addr:housenumber=s/n no se usa. no es un valor. 
Si la casa no tiene número usar nohousenumber=yes

gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141226370
goedegazelle (2023-09-14 04:45:28+00:00): Ik meen dat ik deze tag terecht had aangebracht. Het is micromapping maar dat zou niet verkeerd moeten zijn.

Je kunt je beter druk maken over de tag industrial op adresknopen zoals ik dat wel vaker tegenkom.
goedegazelle (2023-09-14 04:51:23+00:00): Excuses, ik zat naar de verkeerde gegevens te kijken.
sjodl_ (2023-09-13 19:19:57+00:00): Source: https://www.facebook.com/lunacafenowytarg/
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-20 08:26:51+00:00): Hello!

Do you remember what you meant by audio_loop = yes at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11188939010/history ?
StephaneP (2024-02-20 08:31:54+00:00): Hi !
This an equipement for impaired hearing people :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_induction_loop
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-20 18:10:46+00:00): I created https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:audio_loop%3Dyes
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-20 18:10:59+00:00): (feel free to expand it or add more info there)
StephaneP (2024-02-21 18:04:47+00:00): Thank you for taking some time to document this tag !
MKnight (2023-09-14 08:50:04+00:00): Moin,
wenn Du Fahrspuren teilst, musst Du natürlich auch sämtliche Relationen anpassen, sowie die Fahrspuren etc.
Jetzt sind hier etliche Details kaputt.
Ähnliches sehe ich auch in anderen CSen von Dir. 
Das wirs recht sicher jemand rückgängig machen.
MKnight (2023-09-27 19:19:31+00:00): Ich habe den Änderungssatz rückgängi gemacht.

Bitte verwende für derart komplexe Situationen nicht den Onlineeditor(iD)
Des Weiteren: ignoriere nicht die Fehlermeldungen, die Dir Dein Editor angibt.
GISGuy1 (2023-09-13 21:40:17+00:00): Incorrect Description. This is a railroad abutment/earthworks from 1857 for the Loudoun Branch of the Manassas Gap Railroad
eggie (2023-09-13 20:06:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
impiaaa (2023-09-14 16:22:15+00:00): When you merge two objects, double-check that all of the merged tags are still correct. Many of the objects in this change now have duplicated names. Additionally, it isn't always necessary to merge a PoI and a building.
TrickyFoxy (2024-04-15 23:14:16+00:00): 👋 1=12 what did you mean by that?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/587090750
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/587090452
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/587091351
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/587091352
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207568206
MenKauRa (2024-04-16 07:49:51+00:00): this is my mechanical error.. I will fix everything soon... thank you...
felipeeugenio (2023-09-13 20:44:56+00:00): Por favor escribir normalmente, no con mayúsculas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141227857
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-06-08 20:31:04+00:00): que isto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207568521 ?
aTarom (2023-09-14 14:09:03+00:00): Hola  jperl13, gracias por editar, puedes revisar este valor?
"contact:facebook"="https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/36.47126/-6.20612"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207573534/history
no he encontrado, en una búsqueda rápida, si tienen facebook para corregirlo
Saludos
jperl13 (2023-09-14 18:13:22+00:00): Gracias por avisar, revise ahora si esta todo correcto.

Tambien indicar que ahora hay tres (3) estaciones iguales en el mismo poligono.

Saludos.
ovruni (2023-09-13 20:31:27+00:00): Hola, no existe la etiqueta de garden:type=grass, si tiene duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú existe el canal de telegram de la comunidad peruana https://t.me/osmPe
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:59:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143714070, 143714075 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits eines users nach selbstlöschung
Tatfahren (2023-09-14 03:48:21+00:00): Hi xjman, you are not allowed to drive this street backwards, where did you get the information that the street isn't oneway?
xjman (2023-09-14 06:57:09+00:00): Hi Tatfahren, it's a common misconception you're stating - there is no '220 (Einbahnstraße)' sign @Freiberger Straße between 'Poststraße' and 'Markt'. Just look around or use streetview ;-) Also notice sign '286' @Aydin direction Grumbach which wouldn't be there if you weren't allowed to drive in that direction. It's a so called 'Unechte Einbahnstraße' where you are allowed to use both directions.
Tatfahren (2023-09-14 07:05:25+00:00): If i find the time i go look around there, it's one year ago i got there without car or bus driving by. I never seen people driving street backwards from parking lot, they always drove the circle around "Gezinge" also if they wanted to go to "Grumbach".
xjman (2023-09-14 11:18:51+00:00): Streetview pictures are from 2023 so you don't have to look around personally ;-).
People coming from the parking lot are not allowed to use this direction because of sign '209-10 Vorgeschriebene Fahrtrichtung links'.
But that doesn't set a status of 'formal one way' to the mentioned relation - sign 220 is still the relevant aspect.
And if one is not entering the parking lot and doing a turn on Freiberger Straße (will not happen that often but sometimes) would be legal. 
Also a cyclist can put his bike at any time from the sideway on the street and go this way.
Tatfahren (2023-09-14 14:49:43+00:00): I can't find the "Einbahnstraße" sign on mapillary, and streetview (google) is not allowed. Maybe they have removed it last year, i was going to school there for 8 years and nearly daily around this street, so I'm sure there was (or is) one. 

Do the parking lot need its own "Einbahnstraße" sign?, Before that i "thinked" (took?) only residential or higher roads need one, but no parking lots or service road's.

I'm going there if i find the time.
xjman (2023-09-14 16:21:53+00:00): You can't find it because there is none, also hasn't been last year (also no one removed it), maybe even all the years you've been around. Don't believe every thought you think - your brain might trick you.
Sign 209-10 (which is not "Einbahnstraße" but "only left turn" as I wrote above) is at both exits of the parking lot - just to keep traffic around Markt counterclockwise.
Just check the facts with your own eyes and you'll see ;-).
Tatfahren (2023-09-14 16:43:00+00:00): That's why i haven't reverted you and asked before, i want to look over it because i or you can be wrong. Your changesets looked for me at first like you work as a bus driver, and because you gave no source in changeset, and said "no oneway in relation" it looked for me like you have to clean a bus relation.

There was a couple people before you around here that for example only edit for delivery drivers or fixed some city name to the wrong.

That's why i asked here.
Tatfahren (2023-09-14 16:43:36+00:00): It was early morning, so maybe i could not find the right words.
xjman (2023-09-14 17:48:38+00:00): Nevermind - as long as mapping is correct we both have done our job here correctly, didn't we?
Tatfahren (2023-09-14 19:14:34+00:00): If you right i think i done it wrong, because me added the oneway 7 months ago on the street "markt" and one year ago on the other parts of the road. That means over one year of bad data in the database, also when it should not have so much error to routers, because for example i never seen a router saying: "Pick up your bicycle and place it on the road so you can drive the opposite direction." ;-)
Tatfahren (2023-09-14 19:16:15+00:00): I wonder if i were able to use German language in this discussion, or if i was right and you English like in changeset comment.
Syl (2023-09-17 20:31:55+00:00): Bonsoir, j'ai annulé la modification de la Rue de Tardy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44439142
Je viens de la parcourir, la bande cyclable est toujours là.