piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Andrea Musuruane (2023-08-28 10:37:56+00:00): Ciao. Correggi dei tag senza avere conoscenza dei luoghi. Il nome di questa strada https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/951447389 è "Strada Casale - Asti", come da cartelli sul posto. "Strada statale 457 di Moncalvo" è il nome della statale e deve essere inserito su una relazione apposta. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140410014
HellMap (2023-08-26 13:05:55+00:00): Sveiki!

Vai varētu lūdzu precizēt, kas tieši bija domāts ar šo izmaiņu? Cik zinu, šajā posmā nav divvirzienu kustība un sabiedriskais transports to lieto tikai austrumu-rietumu virzienā (no Tilta uz Tvaika vai Ganību, kā tas arī minēts LSM rakstā).

Paldies
gszkr (2026-07-06 13:54:40+00:00): Skąd pomysł na chodniki po południowej stronie Cechowej? Nie ma ich tam.
marczoutendijk (2024-04-01 11:34:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/798417018
What does landuse=2 indicate?
That is not a valid value for landuse.


Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
luisrobledomx1 (2024-04-01 20:07:07+00:00): Hi, Mark: The mistake was from other user. If you see the history, this was added in version 3.
Anyway, I'll remove the tag.

Luis Alberto Robledo.
marczoutendijk (2024-04-01 20:16:07+00:00): Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2023-08-26 14:30:10+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for the contributions! In OSM, we always fully spell out road names, would you mind changing that to "English Setter Drive" please? Thanks!
martien-176 (2023-08-26 16:45:24+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. 

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. 

Please watch these 2 short video for more info: 
-Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
-Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140411680
martien-176 (2023-08-26 16:45:34+00:00): Please be more careful with tracing the outlines of the buildings. Zoom in as close as possible to see the outline of the buildings, hit each corner of the building carefully. Look for shadows, open ground, changes in roof color and vegetation to differentiate buildings. Your editors' Background settings provides the opportunity to change the Brightness, Contrast etc of the imagery. This can help to see buildings etc. more clearly.

Check out these articles with basic information on how to map buildings:
- https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140411680
Mazda05 (2023-08-26 18:05:45+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war
Langlaeufer (2023-08-27 20:08:13+00:00): Hallo Leonard,
ein gemeinsamer Rad-und Fußweg wird als Mehrzweckweg path erfasst und nicht als Fußweg.
Falls du den Weg als Bürgersteig markieren wolltest, dann geht das mit footway=sidewalk
Grüße, und weiterhin frohes mappen Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140411877
map per (2023-08-27 10:22:23+00:00): Hallo BO29,

anonyme Hinweise wie (1) ohne vor Ort Kontrolle oder Plausibilitätsprüfung z.B. über die Firmenwebseite einzutragen ist in OSM nicht üblich und keine gute Idee, weil die Angaben auch falsch seien können.

Viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3836807
silversurfer83 (2023-08-26 16:47:17+00:00): hi there :)

short question: are people allowed to eat their own food when they sit there or would they have to buy food from the operator?

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140412794
jzaefferer (2023-08-27 10:16:29+00:00): It's a private commercial property, so they expect you buy from them.
silversurfer83 (2023-08-27 10:44:14+00:00): Thanks for clarification :)

I just ask because there's a difference between Biergarten and outdoor seating in openstreetmap. Please see here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbiergarten

I'll change the tagging in a bit if it hasn't already happened.

Cheers
Silversurfer83
silversurfer83 (2023-08-27 11:25:34+00:00): here's my version https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140447307
goldfndr (2023-08-30 04:55:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/goldfndr/traces/9716161

I've since confirmed trace and this map update were good.
martien-176 (2023-08-26 16:39:20+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. 

Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline. 

You can improve by avoiding mapping several buildings as one building. Every building must be traced separately. 

Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140413425
MxxCon (2023-08-27 03:15:52+00:00): When you are mapping bus stop_position nodes, unless stops are literally across from each other, each bus stop should have its own stop_position node across from the bus_stop node. You shouldn't "average it out" between 2 stops.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140413444
daniel_solow (2023-08-28 01:43:04+00:00): Do you have a specific example which I can refer to?
daniel_solow (2023-08-28 01:45:31+00:00): The only node I could see (NODE: 5414847333) actually meets the current definition of the public_transport=stop_position "Defines this point as a stop position of the vehicle."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140413444
MxxCon (2023-08-28 01:54:47+00:00): Along Harding Ave way 5698531. You deleted stop_position node 5414847333 that was in front of bus stop 5414847330 and moved stop_position 5414847332 that was in front of bus stop 5414847331 to be between the 2 stops. And similarly 2 blocks to the NE from there.
Also along East Tremont Avenue way 182594652 you moved stop_position to be between 2 stops.
Also on Pennyfield Avenue way 223864184 you created stop_position node that's between 2 bus stops.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140413444
CoyKoi (2023-08-27 09:01:43+00:00): Hi WoedEel, your changeset comment does not explain what you were doing in the changeset. I can see you've deleted the seperately mapped cycleway feature, and instead replaced it with tags on the main highway. Can you explain the reason for this approach? The separately mapped feature was a valid representation of the infrastructure on the ground, and it provided better detail and routing than is provided by the replacement tags. I don't think the tag "cycleway:right=opposite" is valid and may be problematic for routing (according to the OSMWiki page for cycleway).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140414606
marczoutendijk (2025-08-20 18:06:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892131870#map=15/25.34925/-102.78693
landuse=2 ??
What do you mean

Best regards  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
emersonveenstra (2023-08-29 16:39:05+00:00): Hi,

Did you mean to tag this entire way with lanes=5?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17790970

Looks like there's several places on that way where it should be lanes=4 or lanes=6
maxerickson (2023-08-29 21:29:11+00:00): I simply didn't correct the existing tagging (you'll see that it is also present on your edit to version 13 and also earlier versions).

I guess there's an argument that I shouldn't have removed the tiger:reviewed tag, but I think it's pretty okay to remove that if the geometry, classification and name are reasonable.
SekeRob (2023-08-27 06:23:56+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM

Un'osservazione degna di nota è che i tuoi edifici hanno un aspetto scadente. L'obiettivo è quello di mappare esattamente' i contorni. Presta attenzione anche al fatto che gli edifici non si trovino sopra gli alberi e le strade.

Buona mappatura
Layft Greater (2024-08-30 06:15:05+00:00): There was an already mapped crossing in approx 5 meters from the location.

Removed duplicate. The problem is now solved.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11146417943
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10702736351
Layft Greater (2024-08-30 06:26:36+00:00): Also and so on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11146417955
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2144737302
mueschel (2023-09-03 10:05:03+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the tag 
internet_access:hostile

This hasn't been used in any other place yet.
jleedev (2023-09-03 11:28:40+00:00): The wifi was blocking certain sites, using a device or software which generated a certificate on the fly to generate a message (if I chose to click through the error).

I think that this is a factual, mappable scenario but did not see anything under https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=internet_access%3A that looked relevant. A ‘hostile network’ is a more or less standard term.

I also asked in slack.openstreetmap.us but nobody suggested anything.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-26 15:20:20+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1202329266

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
AndresDuhour (2023-11-24 18:43:05+00:00): Hola! una consulta. ¿Estas calles de la escuela de manejo están abiertas al tránsito público? Si no me parece que tendrían que estar etiquetadas como highway=service y por ahí también cambiar name="Calle..." por description="Calle... etc". ¿Qué te parece? Saludos! Andrés
HABmaps (2023-11-24 19:51:27+00:00): Hola Andrés, el circuito es público, no se que determinación le asignó el municipio, los datos estaban cargados, simplemente los alineé respeté la decisión del que las cargó en primera instancia. No se el criterio que usan para los circuitos de manejo, ahora que lo remarcas tiene sentido, no estoy seguro al respecto, si te parece correcto podes modificarlo, saludos
AndresDuhour (2023-11-24 21:21:35+00:00): Hola, muchas gracias por la respuesta. No hay muchos circuitos en el mapa pero corregí uno esta semana y encontré esto:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity%3Ddriver_training. Después lo reviso. Me parece más adecuado usar las etiquetas highway=service en las calles ya que son calles internas al predio. Saludos, Andrés
Sandal man (2023-08-29 16:03:26+00:00): Hola, gracias por tus ajustes al OSM pero evita dibujar caminos sobre caminos existentes.
Ya lo he solucionado para ti.
Saludos Jan
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1202330579#map=18/40.84021/-1.89184
i2004 (2023-08-27 00:26:57+00:00): ahi te complete el ramal 1 sentido once y el ramal 116
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:03:12+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421459
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:03:12+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421458
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:03:08+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421456
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:05:41+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421584
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:04:00+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421513
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:03:51+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421499
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:06:34+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421618
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:03:54+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421504
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:06:57+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421625
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:07:49+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421646
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:07:13+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421633
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:07:00+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421630
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:07:04+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421631
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:07:31+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421643
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:08:05+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421649
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:14:19+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421836
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-26 15:40:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1202334885

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:08:48+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421671
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:10:17+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421713
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:08:50+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421670
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:08:44+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421668
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:11:13+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421743
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:11:02+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421734
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:10:53+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421730
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:11:00+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421733
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:13:23+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421813
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:12:36+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421766
NorthCrab (2023-08-26 17:15:51+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140421865
michael_ua (2023-08-26 17:26:28+00:00): Reverted in

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140422245
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-26 16:00:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1202339036

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
syntex (2025-07-03 23:20:40+00:00): Naprawione
BudgiesEyeView (2025-04-22 19:07:50+00:00): Hi AjBelnuovo,
Thank you for mapping so extensively around São Paulo!
I noticed that you changed the classification of the streets in this residential area to highway=service, service=driveway. This classification is used for streets used to access individual dwellings or businesses (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway) Since these roads provide access to all the houses along their length, it would be more accurate to map them as highway=residential (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dresidential)
Look forward to hearing from you, and hope you have a nice day!

Tradução automática:
Olá, AjBelnuovo,
Obrigado por mapear São Paulo de forma tão completa!
Percebi que você alterou a classificação das ruas nesta área residencial para highway=service, service=driveway. Essa classificação é usada para ruas de acesso a residências ou empresas (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway). Como essas ruas dão acesso a todas as casas ao longo de sua extensão, seria mais preciso mapeá-las como highway=residential (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dresidential).
Aguardo seu contato e espero que tenha um bom dia!
AjBelnuovo (2025-04-22 19:33:00+00:00): Oi,BudgiesEyeView 

Lendo [ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street ] , entendo que a descrição nela contida se adequa mais a situação.
São vias de conjuntos residenciais com regras próprias.

Hi,BudgiesEyeView
 Reading [ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street ], I understand that the description contained therein is more appropriate to the situation. They are residential complex roads with their own rules.
BudgiesEyeView (2025-04-23 21:45:57+00:00): Hi AjBelnuovo, 
It seems that the main difference between living streets and residential streets is that living streets have very low speed limits (20 km/h or lower) and special rules for traffic and parking. I agree living street could work well here, though would you be able to confirm the speed limit or special rules for this neighborhood? Thank you again!

Tradução automática:
Olá, AjBelnuovo. 
Parece que a principal diferença entre ruas residenciais e ruas residenciais é que elas têm limites de velocidade muito baixos (20 km/h ou menos) e regras especiais para trânsito e estacionamento. Concordo que uma rua residencial poderia funcionar bem aqui, mas você poderia confirmar o limite de velocidade ou as regras especiais para este bairro? Obrigado novamente!
AjBelnuovo (2025-04-24 00:56:38+00:00): BudgiesEyeView
These roads usually have a maximum speed of 20 km/hour, with a warning sign at the entrance gate.
BudgiesEyeView (2025-04-25 16:27:39+00:00): Hi AjBelnuovo, that sounds good- I will go ahead and update the street classifications for this neighborhood to living street. Would you be open to using living_street instead of service=driveway in the future for these kinds of roads? Thank you again!

Tradução automática
Olá, AjBelnuovo, parece ótimo. Vou prosseguir e atualizar a classificação das ruas deste bairro para "living_street". Você estaria disposto a usar "living_street" em vez de "service=driveway" no futuro para esses tipos de vias? Obrigado novamente!
AjBelnuovo (2025-05-03 17:06:24+00:00): Hi, BudgiesEyeView

Sorry for the delay in answering. I have used the criterion for residential roads as name and postal code, even within condominiums with restricted access to highway-residential tag
pio2_122 (2023-08-26 19:40:52+00:00): Widzę, że niewiele robisz sobie z uwag i przywracasz te same błędne zmiany (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140276071).

Edycję wycofałem i dodałem odpowiednią relację zakazu skrętu według tego, co zrozumiałem z opisu zmian: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16246166 (choć nie wiem jaka nawigacja mogłaby proponować skręt o takim kącie...).
PierreV79 (2023-09-01 08:57:51+00:00): Bien vu cette erreur.
et pourtant la fiche Sandre des affluents de la Sèvre indique bien le Musson (et pas Mousson, mais apparemment d'après des fiches de rando il aurait aussi cette "variante" avec le o) Je n'avais pas remarqué cette spécificité du changement de nom après 2 affluents, c'est ce qui m'a induit en erreur. Un peu comme ce qui se pratique dans les Pyrénées avec les Gaves
mapperue (2023-09-05 08:04:47+00:00): Ahoj, do názvu sa nevpisuje opis objektu ako tu "Pricestný kamenný kríž".
Matthew Hostak (2023-09-05 08:10:50+00:00): Ano, generalne suhlasim a viem o tom.
V tomto partikularnom pripade som to tam dal preto, ze na tom krizi (vid https://www.google.sk/maps/@48.0797411,17.872184,3a,15.8y,237.49h,80.07t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sMQjN87GnOSMH9euAWqIR6w!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu) je dole tabulka identifikujuca tento kriz ako "Pricestný kamenný kríž" a dalej sa tam pise o historii atd. V tomto pripade by sa to mohlo dat do name, nie? Je to dost generalny nazov, ale je to "oficialny" nazov. Inac jasne - ked vidim kriz a nie je tam nic napisane, tak by som to dal maximalne do description, ale to ze je kamenny je jasne z materialu a pricestny z wayside, takze to by bolo asi zbytocne duplicitne. A neviem ako v tomto pripade poznacit, ze ten nazov som si "nevymyslel" ale opisal. Davam tam source:survey, ale to sa da pochopit rozne.
mapperue (2023-09-05 08:24:40+00:00): Ak je tam tabulka s týmto názvom, tak môže ísť aj do názvu. Pridal som tento názov aj do značky nápis.
Matthew Hostak (2023-09-05 08:32:18+00:00): OK, este som rozmyslal ze to budem davat do description, informaciu to poskytne a zaroven to nikomu nebude vadit (= ja tiez keby som videl takyto nazov tak automaticky predpokladam, ze to je zle zadane, v description by som to neriesil)
BCNorwich (2023-08-28 06:27:03+00:00): Hi, You dragged Launder Close oa long way out of proper alignment. This was highlighted in the warnings given above. Please heed these warnings as often the problem highlighted disrupts routing as this one did. 

I've reverted the changeset.

Regards Bernard.
DressyPear4 (2023-08-26 21:48:43+00:00): Olá, discuta com a comunidade antes de alterar a classificação das vias. Não adicione vias por cima das existentes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140419562
literan (2023-08-28 19:21:49+00:00): ох и наломали вы дров. Поудаляли все имена, не надо было ничего трогать (скриптом автоматом все откатывалось)

а за вами теперь вручную надо все имена восстанавливать
mueschel (2023-09-02 13:47:16+00:00): Hi,
please have a look at this wall:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1202347414

"seatable" is not a common tag and I doubt the wall is 30 meter high.
JLZIMMERMANN (2023-09-02 15:54:16+00:00): Thanks
I change the height but seatable is a tag explaining that we may seat on it.
mueschel (2023-09-02 16:12:45+00:00): Could you check for a better term for this? "seatable" sounds like an English word, but isn't.
silversurfer83 (2023-08-26 16:52:34+00:00): Hi :)

zwei Fragen:
1. Das größere Gebäude, welches auf dem Luftbild an eurem Standort zu sehen ist existiert nicht mehr?

2. Kann man die Lichtbögen an diesem Standort auch kaufen oder seid ihr ein reiner Versand. Was genau ist dieser Standort?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140420169
Lichtbogenmanufaktur (2023-08-26 18:26:17+00:00): Hi, in der grossen Halle war eine andere Firma angemietet. 
Von den Lichtbögen, die wir dort produzieren, haben wir nur einige Produkte vorrätig. Wir können uns leider nicht von allen Produkten welche auf Vorrat legen. Im Onlineshop oder bei einem Besuch bei uns kann man auch sehr gern per Abholung bestellen, dass ist kein Problem. 
Viele Grüße Stefan
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140420169
silversurfer83 (2023-08-26 18:40:03+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung,

Ich muss trotzdem nochmal fragen: steht die größere Halle noch? Weil ihr/du sie nämlich entfernt habt/hast und auf dem Luftbild ist sie noch zu sehen.
Lichtbogenmanufaktur (2023-08-26 19:02:06+00:00): Das war dann wohl mein Fehler;-) Sie steht noch. Ich ändere das eben noch.
Danke für den Hinweis!
silversurfer83 (2023-08-26 19:41:01+00:00): Alles klar, kein Problem :)
eggie (2023-08-26 18:03:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feeback.. name= Zocher heb ik verwijderd en name:nl heb ik omgetagd naar name=   Nu zal de juiste naam op de kaart verschijnen. name:en=  heb ik ook verwijderd. Dat is niet nodig.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
silversurfer83 (2023-08-26 17:19:21+00:00): Hallo und Herzlich willkommen bei OSM :)

schön, dass du OsmAnd nutzt und damit auch neue Daten zur Datenbank hinzufügst. Ein kleiner Hinweis: Nicht jedes Objekt benötigt einen Namen. Auch wenn dir die App immer das Feld für diese Eigenschaft anbietet denke ich, dass die Bank einfach eine Bank ist und nicht "Bank" heißt, oder?

Grüße und immer gute Reise
silversurfer83