piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2025-07-26 17:12:54+00:00): Danke für die Antwort.

Da diese Änderung jedoch eine neue V des nodes erzeugte, hast du mit diesem "Unsinn" die Datenbank weiter aufgebläht.

Es ist eine valide Information und sie gehört erhalten, wenn sie einmal erfasst ist. Da sehe ich auch nicht wirklich abweichende Meinungen.

Dann kann ich das level=0 ja wiederherstellen und den POI auf die nächste V levelen 🤷🏻‍♂️
Protoxenus (2025-07-26 18:55:08+00:00): Ja, das schlummert noch in der DB. Aber es wird nicht mehr an einen Editor gesendet. Und zum Rendern wird es sowieso nicht gebraucht.
wildmaps (2025-01-06 20:19:56+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap! Grazie per il tuo prezioso contributo. 😊

Ho notato che hai aggiunto un indirizzo su un edificio. In Italia, il numero civico identifica un ingresso specifico, mentre in altri paesi può rappresentare un intero immobile. Per questo motivo, in Italia c'è il consenso di creare un nodo separato per indicare l'indirizzo e il numero civico. Ti consiglio di consultare la documentazione ufficiale per maggiori dettagli:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Nomi_delle_strade

Se hai domande o dubbi, non esitare a contattarmi oppure a unirti al gruppo Telegram della community italiana. È un ottimo luogo per scambiare idee e ricevere supporto: https://t.me/+uCPMZf61adtiNDQ8

Grazie ancora e buon mapping!
Michele
Enock4seth (2025-01-04 11:22:36+00:00): Hi, Kindly use Good changeset comments to describe your contributions as using only hashtags is meaningless to other mappers and yourself soon. See why you should use Good changeset comments https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
❤️‍🔥 (2025-01-20 10:21:27+00:00): Hi, you have been setting the 'operator' tag on many businesses to values that could potentially be peoples' names. 

Could you please confirm that this data is not private information? OpenStreetMap is a public database; please see https://osm.wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information for further info
VictorIE (2025-01-04 03:23:02+00:00): Him

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1348343040

Terrace of apartments?
b-unicycling (2025-01-04 16:57:56+00:00): I think so, because the house numbers make no sense otherwise.
VictorIE (2025-01-04 20:56:32+00:00): Odd one side, even the other?
b-unicycling (2025-01-05 18:07:48+00:00): Looks like it actually. :D
Andrea Musuruane (2025-01-04 09:06:43+00:00): Do not copy any information from Wikipedia into OSM. Wikipedia is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 which is incompatible with OSM. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Collaboration_with_Wikipedia Please revert. BR, Andrea
Vinber-Pro (2025-01-08 11:20:15+00:00): @vincedchart, could you reply please ?
Vinber-Pro (2025-01-08 11:23:16+00:00): et cela peut-être en français !
La licence cc by-sa n'est pas compatible avec OSM, donc ce n'est pas une source autorisée.

peux-tu annuler cette modif ? ou venir en discuter sur le forum https://forum.openstreetmap.fr (j'ai vu ta présentation de profil en français).

un vincent aussi
vincedchart (2025-01-08 13:50:20+00:00): Hello everyone. I am sorry that this caused a stir. I've been made aware afterwards that changes across a large area are preferably to be avoided.
That set of changes was proposed on place=town and city, above old_name:it mostly, and name:it where the notion of anachronism can be challenged.
I agree that OSM is not a source to consider, and should have worked differently. This job of adding historical names for the benefit of everyone, culturally, is a first to me,  but it remains my goal as it could benefit the people.

Because a lot of  old books have been made availiable to the public, i'll be able in the near feature to gather that data again with incontestable sources.

This is why I'll agree to put down those changes for now as you read that message.

For replies, I understand and speak French, Italian & english.

Best regards
Vinber-Pro (2025-01-08 13:59:24+00:00): hi,

in fact there's two subjects :

- too large area, but when it's thematic it can be ok 

- source / wikipedia is not authorized because CC-BY-SA isn't compatible with odbl

regards
vincedchart (2025-01-08 14:00:12+00:00): I'll agree to cancel that modification for now, tell me how to do so
vincedchart (2025-01-08 14:00:59+00:00): ok, merci Vinber... je comprends
Vinber-Pro (2025-01-08 14:03:49+00:00): > This is why I'll agree to put down those changes for now as you read that message.

@vincedchart, you revert this changeset ?
Vinber-Pro (2025-01-08 14:57:09+00:00): croisement de message, désolé je n'avais pas vu tes réponses.

Tu as le greffon reverter pour josm pour faciliter cela !
TrickyFoxy (2025-01-04 00:27:33+00:00): Нельзя использовать яндекс.карты
eggie (2025-01-03 21:54:22+00:00): Hoi   Beter niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dan kun je na onbedoelde selectie (adres) of andere nodes verschuiven ipv de kaart.
Beter één buurtje aanpassen en dan uploaden. dan uit de editmosus en dan pas schuiven.
Wanneer een winkel stopt dan graag het adres intact laten. Bv IJzerwaren Zwijndrecht. 

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160967506

MVG
eggie
iDoThisForPikminBloom (2025-01-03 21:56:44+00:00): Ok, bedankt voor de feedback!
eggie (2025-01-03 21:57:13+00:00): adres aan de passage hersteld
iDoThisForPikminBloom (2025-01-03 21:57:21+00:00): Hoe moet je dan de kaart eigenlijk verschuiven?
eggie (2025-01-03 21:59:56+00:00): En de sushi heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. 
Het is soms even zoeken, maar al die adessen zijn er al. Import vanuit het Kadaster.
eggie (2025-01-03 22:03:08+00:00): Adresnode Oudeland 86 hersteld
iDoThisForPikminBloom (2025-01-03 22:03:52+00:00): Nog heel erg bedankt voor alle changes terug.
eggie (2025-01-03 22:06:14+00:00): In editor iD doe je dat met de linkermuisknop. Helaas gaat selecteren ook met diezelfde linkermuisknop. Het is dus een manko van deze editor.
Wanneer je editor JOSM zou gebruiken schuif je met de rechtermuisknop en kun je niet per abuis iets selecteren.
Een aanrader dus.

editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047

Ik heb editor iD eigenlijk nooit willen gebruiken. De meeste ervaren mappers gebruiken allemaal JOSM.
eggie (2025-01-03 22:07:47+00:00): Je kunt in iD wel veilig schuiven met de cursortoetsen heb ik net geprobeerd.
BCNorwich (2025-01-05 06:52:08+00:00): Hi, You've got a large wood area Way: 866283146 on top of a large scrub area Way: 1348072288. This doesn't seem logical, I think it should be wood or scrub not both. Could you please re-think these areas.

Regards Bernard.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-03 22:11:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12472624537
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12472624538

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pavvv (2025-01-03 22:29:27+00:00): Rady osiedli jako jednostki pomocnicze gminy raczej spełniają wymagania na tag government=administrative; wtedy lepiej pasuje do nich tag admin_level. Czym w ogóle jest government=local?
maro21 (2025-01-05 14:46:38+00:00): Do prawie każdego urzędu by pasowało government=administrative - ten tag jest zbyt ogólny.
Admin_level można dodać niezależnie.
Local - samorząd. Chociaż i on nadal nie jest precyzyjny, bo jest wiele poziomów: rada osiedla < gmina < powiat < województwo.
A67-A67 (2025-01-22 20:46:21+00:00): Ik heb de merknaam AVIA XPress hersteld. AVIA is met hoofdletters.
dcskobuffs (2025-01-03 22:21:51+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery
Enock4seth (2025-01-04 11:21:54+00:00): Hi, Kindly use Good changeset comments to describe your contributions as using only hashtags is meaningless to other mappers and yourself soon. See why you should use Good changeset comments https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Frans S (2025-01-04 12:07:20+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Difficult task here.
A few remarks.
You tagged quite a number of traces as a track. Not in line with the African guidelines for tagging highways. Just tag them as unclassified.  We cannot see the quality of the roads. 
You also mapped a number of buildings in an area. To me, they seem to me as abandoned, because you hardly see a roof. (both sidings give a shadow,
I Also added highways found by mapwithAI. 
Are you familiar with this possebility ? Give it a try.
fyi This is the achavi page where you can find my additions and changes i've made
Best regards and keep mapping
Glassman (2025-01-07 16:17:43+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160968686
DUGA (2025-05-13 04:04:28+00:00): I'm seeing non existent power lines from this changeset.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/178560900/history#map=19/39.231488/-75.740771
BCNorwich (2025-01-05 11:07:45+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your requested review, I've reverted your changes because you removed the valid farmyard tag and added the fictional tag making the farmyard scrub.

Please don't add fiction to the live worldwide OSM database from which hundreds of maps are compiled daily.

Regards Bernard
Hugues Ross (2025-01-04 12:35:34+00:00): Hi, welcome to openstreetmap! I gave your change a look, there are a few odd things with it... first of all, you seem to have created 2 copies of the same business with different tags? And they're attached to unrelated geometry as well, generally the way we map businesses is with a detached point directly over the business itself--usually in the center of the building. Additionally, there's no tag for the type of business. Looking at the website it looks to be a car dealership, so it should have a tag for that. Probably shop:car (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcar).

I'm going to combine these points and detach them so that they're not obstructing the road anymore, but since I don't know the exact location of the business I would ask if you can shift it into place once that's done. If not, I'll check in person when I have a chance.
Donkey_Kong (2025-01-04 15:12:55+00:00): Hi Hugues, 

Thanls for the feedback. I didn’t realize I had created a separate set of tags. The address is 1764 Soucy. I thought by entering the address, the point would automatically go there. What step did I miss?
Hugues Ross (2025-01-04 15:26:59+00:00): Unfortunately, that's not how it works in OpenStreetMap--in addition to entering the address, you have to set the position in the world yourself. The reason is simple: While addresses Mostly follow a simple line, the precise location can vary a lot (for instance, consider a building with multiple address numbers stacked vertically. Some of the apartment/plexes around here do that). So there's not really a system that can place it with perfect accuracy even with the address, you always have to do it yourself.
Hugues Ross (2025-01-04 15:31:34+00:00): To add on to that, it's possible to have multiple nodes with the same address in different physical locations. One common pattern is putting the address tags on both the business *and* the building's entrance. This lets data consumers like map apps provide more accurate directions. For another simple example, you can consider something like a mall where the businesses might have the same street & number, but different unit numbers corresponding to specific locations inside the same building.
Donkey_Kong (2025-01-04 23:12:22+00:00): Ok so what are next steps?
Hugues Ross (2025-01-05 13:27:26+00:00): I've already fixed the tags, so all that's left is to reposition the business into the correct building.

If you know which one houses it, you can just drag it in the middle of the building. Else, I will fix that too eventually--I'm close enough to check in person, just gotta make the time for it.

You can find it here for the time being:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12472650466
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-03 23:11:03+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/843140608

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
lmum (2025-01-04 22:48:11+00:00): *modified bridge
uprkos (2025-01-04 04:45:44+00:00): Poprawiłem tagowanie, ponieważ użyte były dziwne znaczniki, a przede wszystkim obiekt został dodany jako samoobsługowa informacja turystyczna.
VictorIE (2025-03-22 20:00:27+00:00): Hi, 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1348391213

These are:
natural=water
water=wastewater
lakedistrict (2025-01-05 22:18:36+00:00): Hi, thanks for your recent and ongoing mapping in the Lakes. 

Based on the name you've added, would the holiday cottage be better tagged as building=barn with building:use=residential/chalet? This would better reflect the building's original purpose and architecture, if indeed it is a converted barn and not just a building with an idyllic-sounding name for marketing purposes! This also applies to the other holiday cottage/barn you added. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:use :)
letsridebikes (2025-01-05 22:38:47+00:00): Excellent question (and excellent username!)

Carter Ground is no longer a working farm, so I decided to verify the age of the buildings using Victorian OS mapping. See here: https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/side-by-side/swipe/#zoom=18.0&lat=54.3212&lon=-3.1868&layers=6&right=osm

This confirms the buildings are indeed old farm structures, and I'm content they would have originally been barns based on their physical appearance. It also confirms the walls to the north were originally another building.

I'll follow your suggestions now. Thanks very much!
lakedistrict (2025-01-05 23:26:57+00:00): Thanks for the reply and quick follow up edits :)

Likewise great username - it's one I remember seeing a while ago when mapping in Reading!
SomeoneElse (2025-01-04 20:20:54+00:00): I've mentioned this again at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/its-time-to-address-the-a8-m/117468/11 ; I'd suggest that that is probably the best place to discuss.
Best Regards,
Andy
Luen Warneke (2026-04-16 04:59:13+00:00): Just wondering why Kauri Creek Road has access=no?
National Parks website has them labelled as Accessible by 4WD & Bicycle: https://parks.qld.gov.au/parks/danbulla/journeys/mount-edith-and-kauri-creek-roads
Thanks.
ITBeyond-Michelle (2026-04-16 07:23:32+00:00): At the time of posting the road was indeed closed - gate locked and signed closed due to unsafe conditions. Note this update was posted in Sept 2024. No one has changed it to reopen - please go ahead and reopen it in OSM if you have current information.
Luen Warneke (2026-04-16 22:44:23+00:00): Thank you for your response. Done https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181434127
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 00:58:32+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164876477
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-06 08:34:53+00:00): jak nic nie zostało to jest do skasowania
Yog Sot (2025-08-06 13:03:10+00:00): te 7 miesięcy temu trafiłem też na jakieś dokumenty, które przedstawiały mniejwiecej przebieg i w jednym miejscu zastanawiałem sie nad jakimis pozostałościami, czy faktycznie są. NIe wiem cały czas nie mam pojęcia czy jest to dla mnie w ogóle istotne.
vimacs_hacks (2025-01-04 02:12:17+00:00): 湾子和达官营公交站的好几个stop_position节点被你这几个修改集删了。
褐色小鬼 (2025-01-04 02:22:03+00:00): 我主要针对道路进行调整，公交站纯属误伤。如果误删，请后续补充
NikolasBinder (2025-01-04 10:18:57+00:00): Nach der Wanderkarte "Zweitälerland" (ISBN/EAN: 9783863984137) hat die Obereck 1178m, laut Kompass Karte "884" (ISBN 978-3-99121-579-0) 1177m. Da hilft nur selber nachmessen :)
santamariense (2025-01-21 13:58:49+00:00): Olá GabSiat,

Eu fiz a importação desses endereços da prefeitura há 6 anos atrás. No OSM se dá preferência ao ground truth (verdade em solo), ou seja, você editou corretamente.

Eu pessoalmente acho que a numeração mudou em algum momento e o morador não atualizou o número da sua casa. Mas enfim, como eu disse, deve-se priorizar a verdade em solo.

Bem-vindo ao OSM e bons mapeamentos!
santamariense
b-jazz (2025-01-12 19:56:12+00:00): Hey there Evan,
Thanks for contributing to the map. I noticed some problems with some of your fairways that surround bunkers. You are using multiple polygons to surround the item, instead of properly using "multipolygons". See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls for more information about proper golf course mapping. I've gone ahead and cleaned up but wanted you to know for future mapping that you might do.
Thanks.
blackboxlogic (2025-01-05 18:25:39+00:00): It looks like you're nearly duplicating the geometry of coastal islands and setting them as nature reserves with the same name. Have you considered just adding the nature reserve tag to the island? It would be far cleaner.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1348410599
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219705227
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160972732
dkwolf (2025-01-06 13:05:39+00:00): It may be that the nature preserve might go beyond the shores. This is the question.  However, I was using parcel data that did appear to be a better shoreline than the original data. Being new to the mapping of nature preserves on existing islands, I am still learning.  I think I have started doing what you said and tagging the existing island as a nature reserve. One question is the nature preserve blots out the island name when rendering after I do this.  But I did see one that was rendered with the island name appearing and the nature preserve name along the side of the boundary.  That was what I was hoping for but maybe I was doing something wrong or being to analytical about how it is dispalyed on the map.
blackboxlogic (2025-01-06 14:45:51+00:00): I'm satisfied knowing that you've given it a great deal of thought and you're not just plopping stuff in. I know how I'd do it (lean toward simple) but I'm sure someone will have a technical reason to keep it complicated.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 00:52:07+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164876409
rene78 (2025-01-09 13:19:01+00:00): Added your route to the Wikipedia article. Thanks for your work!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Line_(Dubai_Metro)#Route
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-29 04:11:53+00:00): Reverted SEO spam vandalism and nonsense tagging of a park

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332529
adelllll (2025-01-09 10:59:37+00:00): با سلام موردی که ویرایش و جاده ثبت کردید اصلا صحت ندارد و روستای طاهراباد اشتباه ثبت شده لطفا منطقه قره ضیالدین را ویرایش ندهید با تشکر
aharvey (2025-01-06 05:01:56+00:00): The name=* tag should only contain the name https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

I've corrected these in my changeset at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160974140

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1342563707
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/635998948
ITBeyond-Michelle (2025-01-06 06:33:40+00:00): Hi thankyou for checking these and I do hope i didnt cause too much trouble but I dont recall any of my updates being to the name field at all - my project was verification of road type, surface, access tags etc but I dont believe any name changes were made. Perhaps Ive overlooked something or made an error of another type - can you please reconfirm what data I supposedly put in the name field incorrectly?
aharvey (2025-01-06 06:47:32+00:00): These two, you can see in the history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1342563707/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/635998948/history
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-04 05:50:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1306312652

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
qmell (2025-01-04 06:09:54+00:00): Próbowałem wyedytować na telefonie, ale widzę, że będzie ciężko, okienka się nie skalują.
NorthCrab (2025-01-05 06:09:24+00:00): OSM ma kilka edytorów mobilnych w swojej ofercie :-)  Every door ja bardzo lubię. Pamiętam też że jest Vespucci z kategorii tych bardziej zaawansowanych.
citrula (2025-01-04 07:13:36+00:00): It looks like the nodes on some of the hoses you added (i.e https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12473047690 ) were also tagged with building=house
mueschel (2025-01-05 11:32:46+00:00): Please check this import, all the ways are missing tags.
IndiaKW2Gf7rTBt5C (2025-01-06 22:39:37+00:00): Do you mean administrative borders between wards, a sub-level administrative areas under city of Purnia?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-04 06:10:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1306312652

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-01-04 06:57:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Goed om het actueel te maken, maar geldt dit ook voor tweewielers?
Meestal zijn deze uitgezonderd. Dan toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no en evt ook voor mofa en moped.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-01-04 08:40:19+00:00): Eenrichtingsverkeer aangepast conform bebordingbestand Gemeente Goor.
https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=52.234689275&lng=6.601321399&z=19
nevw (2025-01-04 09:17:17+00:00): Hi, should https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1348431859 be ICT instead of 1ICT ?
Xavier horwood (2025-01-04 11:05:07+00:00): no 1ICT is correct https://www.dnb.com/business-directory/company-profiles.1ict_pty_ltd.c2569229b398ded6c4708a734a76f720.html
eggie (2025-01-04 07:02:28+00:00): Dag Ronald. .. name=  alleen gebruiken voor officiële (straat)namen.
Haal je de straatnaam weer weg of gebruik desnoods description ipv name.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-01-04 08:45:24+00:00): name omgezet naar description
TrickyFoxy (2025-01-05 00:27:58+00:00): ИТМО ли? :)
mona_magdy (2025-01-06 09:52:34+00:00): Hello, Jad200908;
Thank you for the updates you make in the united-arab-emirates,
I noticed you added this tunnel (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1348439079) near Oud Maitha Road, but is it possible for you to include with the updates you make the specific source from which you get these updates?
Regards
mona_magdy
Langlaeufer (2025-02-06 16:44:48+00:00): Du hast hier ein Stück vom Feldweg bei Elis Blumenscheune gelöscht. Ich stell den erst einmal wieder her. Wolltest du dort ein Stück Straße einführen? Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160977332
Langlaeufer (2025-01-14 09:57:00+00:00): Wenn der Weg verdichtet ist (compacted) - also gebaut - dann keiner er eigentlich nicht informal sein, oder?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160977433
Langlaeufer (2025-01-14 09:57:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40648007
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160977433