piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Patrickov (2023-09-12 00:08:16+00:00): Fixed 12 bus route relations broken by this change through https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141137245
HolloWorld (2023-09-13 01:46:53+00:00): 1. junction:ref cannot replace motorway_junction as it's tagging which way is the exit. On some multiple numbered exit on same node position (e.g. WHT HK exit EHT KLN exit) both or even 3 way have exit number.
2. it's to rollback to support application that only use highway=speed_camera on the highway (as wiki written on highway or next to road)
To Patrickov: asking josm why it always brake relations, to my sense it just split 1 way to 2
Patrickov (2023-09-13 01:56:42+00:00): @HolloWorld:

I figured out that it's not JOSM's fault.

Instead, when you split a way with relations, you should first download all ways immediately connected to the affected way(s) in the same layer.  Otherwise, JOSM will only re-arrange relation members according to the direction of the way you have split.
literan (2023-09-11 20:13:53+00:00): за собой надо убирать мусор
emersonveenstra (2023-09-13 16:51:29+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141220584 for dubious sources, misuse of the toll key, and not following the Organized Editing Guidelines
NieWnen (2023-11-03 18:03:02+00:00): Hej, ta poprzednia zmiana pomijając literówkę wygląda na poprawną. Czy jest jakiś inny powód jej wycofania?

Na tam odcinku raczej nic nie jeździ, chyba, że się mylę.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-20 11:28:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11183296903/history

is it shop? office? something else?
user_5359 (2023-09-11 14:08:02+00:00): Hello! Please don't create your own tags, have a look on wiki.osm.org or tag info.osm.org!
gscholz (2023-09-12 05:47:12+00:00): Hi Evarist Isdory,
this changeset has created error in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=40.74320&lat=2.31025&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141110835

Especially way 366311060 is affected here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366311060

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-02-25 02:05:11+00:00): Hello, Why you remove motorcar or motor_vehicle = no for narrow alley that can not fit car?
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:29:57+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365381
emersonveenstra (2023-09-13 16:51:26+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141220584 for dubious sources, misuse of the toll key, and not following the Organized Editing Guidelines
pe_mapper (2023-09-13 17:21:47+00:00): Tu vyzeraju byt polozky wikidata/wikipedia zmenene na zlu hodnotu
mapperue (2023-09-14 07:49:27+00:00): Je to opravené.
eggie (2023-09-11 14:21:32+00:00): Het luistert echt heel nauw in OSM Leursebaan 332 is geen straatnaam. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-11 14:20:48+00:00): Niet correct helaas. 
Vraag adressen aan via het forum.  
Het adres bevat een spelfout.
eggie (2023-09-11 14:17:07+00:00): Dag Erwin.. Meestel geven we opritten geen straatnaam. De staatnaam hoort in ieder geval geen adresnummer te hebben. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-11 14:19:44+00:00): Je hebt een adres geplaatst op een stuk land, .. niet volgens de format van OSM.
Adressen zijn allemaal import vanuit het Kadaster. Via het forum kun je adressen en woningimport aanvragen.
Zie BAG importverzoeken. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-11 14:26:11+00:00): Op 3 sept 2023 niets te zien..Dus import ook niet mogelijk. Pas als de bouw begint.  Ik zal de adresgegevens hier verwijderen. Dan is het weer correct.
Import hier aanvragen https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43
Groet
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-11 13:00:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184989472
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184996955
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184994617
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184993297
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184995432
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184995975
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184991910
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100143329
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100143460
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100143463
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100143418
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100143413
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100132379
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100143484

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:27:42+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365346
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:21:49+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365260
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:19:50+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365239
Kovoschiz (2023-09-11 14:20:07+00:00): Please don't modify the entire building. That's what you have edited here. Create a new point inside.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:19:47+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365237
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:19:41+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365234
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:19:34+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365231
eggie (2023-09-11 14:15:29+00:00): Dag Ron,
Lijkt me oke... Volgens  de BGT is dit inderdaad de Gashouder.
MVG
eggie
archpdx (2023-09-13 14:52:44+00:00): Hi,
What is the source for this edit?
Maneesh-Mahlawat (2023-09-15 05:45:23+00:00): This is a wrong edit. It is a mistake that Ganesh Bhardwaj made. I talked to the user. Thank you for reverting this change
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-11 13:10:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184990091
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184997512
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100132377
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100132378

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
cytryn (2023-09-12 17:43:32+00:00): Nie nadawaj nazw opisowych obiektom, które ich nie mają (np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206888856) - patrz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy#Nazwa_jest_tylko_nazw%C4%85
Ponadto tag playground:theme służy do doprecyzowania motywu przewodniego wyposażenia placu zabaw, a nie do powtarzania, ze to plac zabaw - patrz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground:theme
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:19:27+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365229
emersonveenstra (2023-09-11 16:15:00+00:00): Hi,

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17789427 you added the key "`toll" instead of "toll", could you please fix this? Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2023-09-13 16:51:23+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141220584 for dubious sources, misuse of the toll key, and not following the Organized Editing Guidelines
emersonveenstra (2023-09-13 16:51:20+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141220584 for dubious sources, misuse of the toll key, and not following the Organized Editing Guidelines
CurlingMan13 (2023-09-11 13:43:54+00:00): Landcovers should not partially overlap, as you have done with the fairways and golf greens.  The smaller area should be fully within the other, OR they should not overlap at all.

I have corrected this to resolve OSM error flags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141112481
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:17:49+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365212
hsc666 (2023-09-13 18:58:39+00:00): Hallo Roterkäfer und willkommen bei OSM! 

Bitte sieh Dir mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name an, bevor Du weitere Bänke oder Mülleimer einträgst!

VG
hsc666
osmviborg (2023-09-11 13:21:00+00:00): Hvorfor bruger du ikke 2023 ortofoto, det har været til rådighed længe? Detaljeringsgraden ville blive bedre.
emersonveenstra (2023-09-13 16:51:18+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141220584 for dubious sources, misuse of the toll key, and not following the Organized Editing Guidelines
AllotmentCyclist (2023-12-03 15:54:24+00:00): I think your comment relates to the Driveway that leads to Newhall Farm from the Chester High Road next to Mini Monsters. I wondered why you think this is an publicly accessible footpath? There is a large sign sayong Private and the drive is not marked as a Public Footpath on the 1:25K OS map.
karf101 (2023-12-03 19:46:55+00:00): The footpath originally joined the road rather than the A540 meaning that software using the maps would not let users plot routes from the footpath onto the A540. This was not originally an issue until the access road was changed to private. I imagine now that the footpath has been joined to the A540 instead this should no longer be an issue.
AllotmentCyclist (2023-12-03 20:45:39+00:00): Yes, agreed, thanks for the confirmation, I will change the driveway to private.
clay_c (2023-09-20 13:59:58+00:00): The roadways that have been tagged toll=yes in this changeset are not toll roads. Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141515683
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:17:42+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365210
emersonveenstra (2023-09-13 16:51:14+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141220584 for dubious sources, misuse of the toll key, and not following the Organized Editing Guidelines
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:17:34+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365209
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:17:27+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365208
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:17:19+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365206
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:17:16+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365205
pio2_122 (2023-09-11 13:56:55+00:00): Chwilę wcześniej zdążyłem wyłapać ten brak i dodałem tą łącznicę: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206890284
Pozwoliłem więc sobie usunąć ten dubel :)
MxxCon (2023-09-14 08:31:00+00:00): Why did you delete brand tags and building height here?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141114585
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-09-11 15:09:13+00:00): Hallo StefanHRT,
bist Du sicher, dass auf den Wegen im Gutspark Radfahren nicht erlaubt ist? ich habe vor Ort keine Schilder gesehen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35320232 ist z.B. ein ganz simpler Trampelpfad. Oder wird das über die Parkordnung geregelt?
Viele Grüße
StefanHRT (2023-09-11 15:34:23+00:00): Das wird nicht nur durch die Parkordnung sondern auch per Gesetz für Geschützte Grünanlagen  (Tulpenschild) geregelt (Hier müssen alle Wege für Fahrräder freigegeben sein). Es hatte einen Grund warum die Wege als Fußwege gesetzt waren, da gilt ein inkludiertes bicycle=dismount und man hätte das no umgehen können. VG
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-09-11 17:50:50+00:00): Danke für die Erklärung, das wusste ich nicht. Leider findet man in OSM haufenweise inflationär verwendete footway/cycleway, die unzutreffend sind, da eben keine reine Geh- bzw. Radwege.

Ich ändere das morgen zurück in hw=footway. Du kannst mich gerne zukünftig auf solche Fehler ansprechen/anschreiben, da sonst die Gefahr besteht, dass weiterhin solche Verschlimmbesserungen gemacht werden. ;-)

Viele Grüße aus der Lüneburger Heide!
StefanHRT (2023-09-11 18:58:21+00:00): Das vielerorts die Wegklassifizierung nicht stimmt ist mir bewusst, das meiste in Berlin ist aber soweit in Ordnung unter Berücksichtigung der lokalen Besonderheiten.
Und Du hast recht, ich hätte Dir auch schreiben können, aber leider reagieren viele oft nicht und ich wollte verhindern dass die Wege im Fahrradrouting Berücksichtigung finden ;) 
Kommst ja aus einer schönen Gegend wo man gut Radfahren kann.
VG Stefan
bxl-forever (2023-09-11 16:25:48+00:00): Hello,

I saw you made 25 edits in 3 different countries on your first day.  I am puzzled by some tags.

Take this building here:

It had "addr:housename=Frobisher Crescent".
You added "name:en=Frobisher Crescent".

I presume this should be fixed.  First, name:en is only for an English translation of a name in another language.  This shouldn’t happen here: use the normal "name" tag instead of the translation, and remove the addr:housename.

Alternatively, you might consider using "building:name" to name buildings, especially when it has tags related to something else.
buildingnamer (2023-09-12 07:29:02+00:00): Hello, thank you, I will keep that in mind
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:17:10+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365204
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:17:03+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365201
user_5359 (2023-09-12 05:59:08+00:00): Hello! Please use the standard keys and values!
Bendita Moreira (2024-02-27 08:56:44+00:00): Thanks I'll fix it.
Snusmumriken (2023-09-11 14:46:33+00:00): Hej

Öppettiderna som du satte på restaurangen är konstig. Har den stängt helt, eller vad är tanken?
deob83 (2023-09-11 18:22:36+00:00): Den är temporärt stängd, enligt en lapp på dörren. Eftersom den inte är nedlagd tyckte jag att det verkade mer rätt att ändra öppettiderna än att använda t.ex. 'disused'.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-11 14:10:20+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206903600

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Metzor (2023-09-11 18:58:47+00:00): Hi karaga,

Thanks for contributing :-) 

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:16:59+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365198
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-11 14:10:21+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206905259

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-11 14:20:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206903600

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11183504980
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11183504981

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
martinst (2023-09-11 16:42:39+00:00): cash_in=customers
laut 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cash_in
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-12 02:43:28+00:00): To twoje uwagi były? Jak nie - to jak zweryfikowałeś ich poprawność?
k2101 (2023-09-12 03:17:36+00:00): To nie moje uwagi. Natomiast już Ci wspominałem, że wszystko prócz instytucji jest weryfikowane sprawnie za pomocą narzędzi, które w Krośnie na szczęście mamy. 
https://krosno.pl/zalatw-sprawe/mapy-geodezja
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-12 05:43:41+00:00): a na jakiej licencji są te mapy?
k2101 (2023-09-12 05:54:37+00:00): O ewidencję gminy to już pytaj urząd miasta.
Z kolei na stronie Obliview (to mapy sfinansowane w 2022 z budżetu miasta i Funduszy Norweskich) znajduje się regulamin.
eggie (2023-09-11 14:31:38+00:00): Dit kan wel voor de vindbaarheid, maar ook kans dat iemand het weer verwijderd.
Kijk hier hoe die opriiten lopen.
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=11-09-2022&loc=51.58744%2C4.715066%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-09-03&acqid=20230903_110428_PNEO-04_1_1%2C20230903_110450_PNEO-04_1_1&sensor=Pleiades-NEO
Frans S (2023-09-11 14:52:59+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
When you tag a residential area, don't cross buildings or other landuse mappings.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141116586
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-16 05:50:27+00:00): Have you intentionally deleted some part of motorway and ignored validator warnings?

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/15335183/history
Pulkit Rathi (2023-09-18 04:55:18+00:00): No, it wasn't my intention. It was an accidental mistake. Thankyou
canfe (2023-11-16 17:33:56+00:00): Sono sbilenchi.
Se ortogonali, quadrali con CRTL Q da ID
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141117032
marczoutendijk (2023-11-13 14:24:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206914623
bridge=1?
What is the meaning of that?
OSMCowboy (2023-11-13 20:11:22+00:00): Hello marczorutendijk, thanks for catching this! My intention was to add bridge=yes, I will update the tag now. Happy Mapping!
Frans S (2023-09-20 12:58:01+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141117259
mirikaaa (2024-01-15 06:08:28+00:00): Hi, Frans S! Thanks for your recommendations, I'll keep them in mind.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141117259
map per (2023-09-11 17:28:42+00:00): Hello MCA42,

I think the track was mapped just fine before. Survace=gravel is used for very big stones (see (1)).

Best regards
map per

(1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dgravel
map per (2023-09-11 17:29:11+00:00): And welcome to OpenStreetMaps of course!
MCA42 (2023-09-12 08:17:00+00:00): Hi map per,
Thanks for the welcome!
I believe "gravel" is the correct designation, because:

1. There are many large pieces (roughly 4-5cm) of gravel on the path, and the page for Surface=compacted (1) suggests 2cm as the largest size of pieces

2. Surface=compacted means "compacted [...] so the surface is more stable than loose gravel". However, this route seemed quite loose, with gravel that shifted substantially when moving over it.

3. The description page for Surface=gravel says it "has very wide meaning range [...] through small pieces of gravel"

It's possible it started out as a compacted route several years ago, but I wouldn't recognize it as "compacted" today. However, I am very new to this community, so please let me know if you think this reasoning doesn't match up with community standards!

Regards,
MCA42

(1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dcompacted
map per (2023-09-13 13:07:41+00:00): I wouldn't use surface=gravel as, the track's surface doesn't macht the original definition of "Broken/crushed rock with sharp edges, known as ballast on railways"(2) and because it's usage for a wide meaning range makes this tag ambiguous.
I heaven't cycled on this track for about a year, but surface=peblestone (3) could fit there.
Best would probably be to split the way up with some sections as surface=compacted and some with surface=peblestone.

(2) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dgravel
(3) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dpebblestone
MCA42 (2023-09-13 22:09:43+00:00): I see, that reasoning about surface=gravel makes sense to me, thank you for the explanation. 

The only issue with surface=pebblestone is that I recall many stones which are not "rounded", as described on that page. However, it still seems like a reasonable classification to me. Shall I make the change?

I cycled most of the track this past weekend, from the southern end until near Hugo-Junkers-Strasse, and the track was in fairly uniform condition, so I don't think it's worth splitting up at this time.
map per (2023-09-15 19:47:09+00:00): >Shall I make the change?
Yes, just go ahead
MCA42 (2023-09-18 11:10:34+00:00): I have updated this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141419096
gurglypipe (2023-09-11 15:39:49+00:00): Heya, why delete the natural=peak here? I don’t know of any evidence there is a trig point there, but OS OpenData StreetView does say the hill is called Latrigg. Ta
Satotiga (2023-09-11 16:07:10+00:00): Getting trigger happy with the delete button, apologies! I've removed the trig point as looking through various trig point databases & maps there is no evidence of it. Added the peak back and adding some more detail to the area too.
gurglypipe (2023-09-11 16:48:13+00:00): I wondered if it was something like that. Thanks for fixing it so quickly and adding more detail, great work! :D