piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viktoriia_frolova (2026-05-06 12:47:31+00:00): Merci de ces précisions. J'ai vérifié manuellement chacun des itinéraires mentionnés sur OSM et j'ai confirmé la présence des lignes de bus sur ce site. Cependant, ces mêmes itinéraires n'apparaissent pas lorsqu'on y accède via les liens du service PTNA, ce qui pourrait être un problème lié au service. Avez-vous essayé de vérifier les lignes directement sur OSM ? Comme nos modifications sont apportées à OSM, nous ne sommes pas en mesure de corriger les divergences dans les services externes si les données sous-jacentes sont déjà correctes. Si vous êtes certain qu'il manque des données sur OSM, nous vous serions reconnaissants de bien vouloir nous aider à résoudre ce problème.

Thank you for specifying. I have manually verified each of the mentioned ways on OSM and confirmed the presence of the bus routes there. However, the same routes do not appear when accessed via the PTNA service links, which may be a service-related issue. Have you tried checking the routes directly on OSM? As our modifications are made to OSM, we are unable to rectify discrepancies in external services if the underlying data is already correct. If you are confident that there is missing data on OSM, we would kindly appreciate your assistance with resolving this issue.
tomhukins (2026-05-26 10:33:10+00:00): Thank you for adding this path.  Unfortunately you have added it in the wrong place.  There is a path between Haw Clough Lane and Bunkers, but it runs next to Morley cottage.

Having things missing from the map seems better than having confusing, incorrect details, so I have deleted this path in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183199493.

Thank you for all your helpful mapping work: hopefully someone will add this path in its correct location before long.
FroschForscher (2026-04-29 15:57:37+00:00): Hallo Hunt4Target,
handelt es sich hierbei um einen Maibaum? Dieser wird mit man_made=maypole getaggt. 

> Ein Obelisk ist ein freistehender, hoher, sich nach oben verjüngender monolithischer Steinpfeiler, der eine pyramidenförmige Spitze hat.

FroschForscher
FroschForscher (2026-04-29 15:58:23+00:00): PS: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments#Alte_Kommentare_wiederverwenden
Hunt4Target (2026-04-29 18:11:04+00:00): Danke für die Änderung. Ja, es ist in der Tat ein Maibaum. Ich hatte das falsche Symbol ausgewählt, da Maibaum nicht zur Auswahl stand.
bxl-forever (2026-04-23 11:49:26+00:00): Hello, czdawes.

I am afraid the source of your data is not reliable.

There is no such thing as numbers for the "Roman emperor" busts in the park, this is a made-up numbering by a single wikidata contributor, which you seem to have imported to OSM.

Also, the name of objects violates the naming conventions for our city, such names are expected to be in both languages.

I read from your profile description that you don’t really care and expect local communities to fix your mistakes. Is that so?

Thanks in advance.
czdawes (2026-04-23 14:05:20+00:00): Hi, thanks for warning, i though wiki was reliable source, but you corrected me. 

Could you advice me on how to advance now? I guess the names and wikidata doesnt match reality, so is reverting this changeset via https://revert.monicz.dev/ enough? or are some names/data correct and i should let them there.
czdawes (2026-04-23 14:30:28+00:00): Edit: upon further research i reverted them with all changes in brussel (this changese) with said tool.

Once again, thanks for the feedback
bxl-forever (2026-04-23 16:26:38+00:00): Thanks for writing back.
I did not ask to fully revert this changeset, some parts of it contain useful data, such as the links to wikidata, artists’ names or wikimedia commons.
I took some parts of this change to update the data and restore the relevant parts, while keeping the bad names as descriptions. That should be all right now.
Have a nice day.
AndyB_66 (2026-04-23 10:52:11+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181689295
Rubenke (2026-04-23 11:13:36+00:00): Waarom haal je het weg dan?
Het is nog steeds zichtbaar een pad.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-04-23 23:53:43+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1866097823
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107397060

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
jb54osm (2026-04-23 18:08:03+00:00): Hi JJ_P,

You moved a building. That's not a good idea. In The Netherlands we import the buildings from the official registry (Kadaster). Now the building is in the wrong place.
Please correct this mishap.
JJ_P (2026-04-24 05:36:34+00:00): Hello!
I took your comment into account and adjusted the building using PDOK BGT standaardvisualisatie. Please tell me is this correct? I didn't want to make a mistake. Thank you for telling me not to fix the geometry!
jb54osm (2026-04-24 05:57:20+00:00): Hi,

PDOK is a good choice to correct outlines of buildings. A future automatic update might correct minute differences.
Thank you.
JJ_P (2026-04-24 06:00:18+00:00): Thank you!
ostrograd (2026-04-24 02:00:31+00:00): This parking lot is completely gone. It's being redeveloped at apartments and the area I marked as a construction zone is in fact a construction zone.
democat (2026-04-24 02:06:49+00:00): This was previously detailed here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181701405#c1587075 and reverted 2 hours before this changeset: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181706867
DFW-Backyard7 (2026-04-24 02:15:59+00:00): CHanged to demolished:highway: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181743223
grawat_Lyft (2026-04-25 03:07:29+00:00): Hi all,
My name is Gaurav, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for reviewing my recent edit and for your helpful corrections—I appreciate your support.
I sincerely apologize for the oversight and any inconvenience these edits may have caused.Additionally, I have now removed the previously overlooked way in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181747433#map=19/32.719258/-96.684669&layers=N)
Thank you for your contributions to OSM.

Best regards,
Gaurav
vanagaudi (2026-04-23 14:07:37+00:00): Eine Ende der Vermietung bedeutet nicht, dass das Gebäude abgerissen wurde. Besser nur die Einträge zum Gebäude löschen, die zur Vermietung gehören. Alle anderen Einträge wie Gebäudeumrisse und die Gebäudeadresse sollten bestehen bleiben.
Wildsharky (2026-04-28 10:50:46+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181763425
alexgsy (2026-04-23 16:44:30+00:00): Сломалось отображение леса.
alexgsy (2026-04-25 13:31:37+00:00): Исправил
LukteDukte (2026-04-26 16:21:59+00:00): Looking this up a bit about it. buildings with multiple offices, best practice is to define the entire building as office and use nodes to describe individual office/company in the building.

Your work here is good. Just the center one(Kampsportsförening & Lantmäteriet) can be a singular building=office. 

The small building in between them, you could tag them as building:part. Since they seem to be connected to the buildings in some way. But this might be your local knowledge what they are.

The rest is to add nodes in the building that describe the office/company. Hopefully that helped with your question!
bitbytee (2026-05-12 13:49:27+00:00): Thank you!
Wildsharky (2026-04-28 10:49:08+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181761607
Tatfahren (2026-04-23 16:43:29+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description#Wie_der_Tag_nicht_verwendet_werden_sollte
Jeffry Mardyo (2026-04-23 15:44:43+00:00): Q3127 and Q3128 are tertiary roads set to be gazetted as state roads, according to local sources.
MairaValley (2026-04-27 09:52:42+00:00): Hello Jeffry Mardyo! I reclassified (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387917875), (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1073788739), and (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387917907) to residential since it seemed like secondary classification doesn’t meet the definition of “Roads that connects across key places across a state (e.g. between villages and nearby towns) is suggested to carry the highway=secondary tag.“ in the Malaysia Roads Tagging OSM Wiki (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181716014). If the ref tags you added have relation with classification, would you be able to provide those local resources? Thank you and happy mapping!
Jeffry Mardyo (2026-04-27 10:08:31+00:00): I suggest classifying Q3232, Q3128, and Q3127 as tertiary roads since they’ve been gazetted as state roads. According to the Malaysia Roads Tagging OSM Wiki, roads fall under the tertiary classification when declared as state roads, and “roads that act as connector roads between a village and a main road may be tagged as such.” These roads connect to Q465 and Q3232. For the state road code, please refer to the following source: Jalan Hijrah Lot: (https://www.google.com/maps/@1.3868683,110.7641605,3a,15y,137.64h,82.34t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sTKeOzQpaaFNiDwLU_mULZg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D7.664494607033333%26panoid%3DTKeOzQpaaFNiDwLU_mULZg%26yaw%3D137.6379324031672!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDQyMi4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D), Q3128 (https://www.google.com/maps/@1.3766425,110.7700132,3a,17.5y,273.32h,86.61t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1slhMUtE2rAiGoHSM4kVeAVg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D3.387931726780309%26panoid%3DlhMUtE2rAiGoHSM4kVeAVg%26yaw%3D273.31566870049846!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDQyMi4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D) and Q3127 (https://www.google.com/maps/@1.374086,110.757194,3a,18.1y,83.35h,83.94t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1syH6u5FTDS_beC_ahrAC6rA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D6.058685469341427%26panoid%3DyH6u5FTDS_beC_ahrAC6rA%26yaw%3D83.34754117511771!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDQyMi4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D).
MairaValley (2026-04-28 11:06:04+00:00): Hi Jeffry Mardyo,
I am happy to defer to your knowledge on classifying Q824 and Q3002 as tertiary, however Google Maps prohibits the use of its service "to create or augment any other mapping-related dataset” (https://www.google.com/intl/en/help/terms_maps/) and Google is not licensed for use in OSM (https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_and_Legal_FAQ#:~:text=2.1.5.%20Can%20I%20copy%20data%20from%20Google%3F). Based on this, I suggest only using citable resources/local survey in contributions to OSM data. Thank you and hope you have a nice day!
Jeffry Mardyo (2026-04-24 04:58:43+00:00): The stretch of Jln Gedong leading up to the junction with Jalan menuju SK Abang Kadir Gedong should be considered a secondary road. Residents from Kpg Gumpey, Spaoh, and Sebemban often use it when traveling out of Gedong.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-04-23 23:53:45+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2590250026
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90792808

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-04-23 23:53:58+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13755069508

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
habi (2026-04-23 13:02:28+00:00): https://qa.poole.ch/addresses/GWR/619_all.osm.zip
MappingMore (2026-04-25 05:09:05+00:00): Partially Revert of 181709848
eggie (2026-04-23 13:50:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Wat bedoel je met weggehaald. Hoe lopen dan nu de busroutes? 
Hoe komt de weg dan terug?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-23 13:55:30+00:00): De situatie afgelopen week.
Ik zie de wegdelen nog steeds en deze stonden op access=no muv bus=yes
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.71934,4.172890,20/?datastrip=20260414_SVNEO-04&sensorname=SuperView-NEO
Weet je hoe de busroutes nu lopen?
AndyB_66 (2026-04-23 14:21:39+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
I-76 (2026-04-23 19:10:17+00:00): Descriptive name and dupe building removed. Version and changeset should probably be redacted
habi (2026-04-23 13:23:30+00:00): Changeset ist wegen Zügeln von Korbflechter, der auch in der associatedStreet-Relation drin war so gross: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181717884.
Sorry
Pontificator Extraordinaire (2026-04-23 19:04:25+00:00): Please do not use descriptive names on objects; use one official name per business or leave the `name=*` field blank if it does not have one.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181718678
ika-chan! (2026-04-23 13:29:56+00:00): Partial revert of 181690183.
SafwatHalaby (2026-04-26 08:52:42+00:00): שלום חיליק! הוספת את המלל "היורד ליגור" בתגית השם, אבל זה כבר קיים בתגית ה-"mtb:name"

באופן כללי אנחנו מוסיפים שמות לא פורמליים של סינגלים בתגית mtb:name 

ראה כאן:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#Names_of_unofficial_MTB_single-tracks
SafwatHalaby (2026-04-26 08:54:24+00:00): אני ממליץ למחוק את תגית ה-name 

ולהוסיף תגיות mtb:name, mtb:name:he עבור המקטע הנוסף שהתכוונת להרחיב
gmar5 (2026-04-23 14:35:01+00:00): Thanks!
Grove11 (2026-04-25 17:41:31+00:00): Hi, thanks for your edit at Auldfield Gate, do you happen to know the name of this road further up? (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/985107443)
SimonXIX (2026-04-27 07:36:15+00:00): Hi, I think that's Auldfield Lane but I can have a wander round there at some point to verify.
MappingMore (2026-04-24 07:00:54+00:00): Revert of 181713228
NorthCrab_upload (2026-04-23 23:53:47+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13755245178

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2026-04-23 14:21:24+00:00): Dag sknl,

review_requested 	yes
Wanneer het ondergrondse deel de rendering in de weg zit tag ik dat om naar building:part=yes
Dan valt de rendering weg, maar behoud je de BAG data.
Maar het zuidelijk deel is da lastig zie ik, want dat zit niet helemaal ondergronds.
MVG
eggie
sknl (2026-04-23 15:50:33+00:00): Zuidelijke deel is inderdaad de hellingbaan naar de ondergrondse parkeergarage. Kon hier geen passend item bij vinden.
AndyB_66 (2026-04-23 14:19:35+00:00): Stosuj się, proszę, do zasad komentowania zestawów zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
LavaFlowsYT (2026-04-23 16:29:07+00:00): i can help
Pontificator Extraordinaire (2026-04-23 18:58:02+00:00): Please do not delete and redraw buildings if they are correct. Businesses sharing one building should be mapped with nodes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181720799
anticyclonic (2026-04-23 20:30:56+00:00): Apologies
rwblake (2026-04-28 22:55:31+00:00): Hello. Is pedestrian access prohibited? A lack of pavements is best tagged with sidewalk=no. foot=no means it's prohibited, not that it's inadvisable.
PeteRichardson (2026-04-29 09:17:53+00:00): Good point,  I’m trying to stop CityStrides as showing that road as suitable for walking or running when it really is quite dangerous, even if technically legal.  I’ll try tagging it as  you suggested instead and see what CityStrides does   with that.  Thanks for catching that one
PeteRichardson (2026-04-29 09:34:04+00:00): Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181978948 - please let me know what you think
PeteRichardson (2026-04-29 09:36:04+00:00): Hang on - I misread your original comment, the lightbulb has gone on.  I will update again and *remove* foot=no, :)
rwblake (2026-05-11 21:25:23+00:00): Thank you. I understand your original rationale, and it's great you've fixed things. :)
wolfbert (2026-05-15 13:32:41+00:00): Hallo Daniel, bzgl. Rollfährenhaus, nicht alle Namen aus der basemap sind tatsächliche Straßennamen. Im Gegensatz zu OSM unterscheidet die basemap nicht zwischen Straßen und Orten (siehe im Wiki Austria, sowie unter names und addr:street/place).

Hab die Adresse schon korrigiert.
InfosReseaux (2026-05-07 14:47:50+00:00): Bonjour Enzo,

J'ai un peu de mal à suivre cette piste cyclable : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1502874914
Je pourrai avoir de gros ennuis avec les bus je pense.

Où puis-je trouver le PCRS raster sur cette zone ? Directement à la Métropole ?

Bonne journée
enzo_immergis (2026-05-18 08:26:33+00:00): Salut InfosReseaux,
Désolé pour l'attente j'ai pris quelques jours de repos.

Merci pour ton signalement ! 
C'est une erreur très grossière de ma part. Je m'occupe justement de faire du ménage cette semaine. 

Pour le PCRS raster, je vais demander à Victor. Il l'a mis à dispo sur un petit serveur de la Région, et il n'était pas sûr que cela puisse supporter la demande :/

Bonne journée
enzo_immergis (2026-05-18 08:35:54+00:00): Voici un lien public pour le PCRS raster, nommé ici OrthoPhoto THR https://www.datasud.fr/portal/collections/orthophotographies_thr
Tomas09 (2026-04-23 14:20:45+00:00): Misclick on enter :P 
"Editing landuse and path"
user_23884811 (2026-04-23 15:34:16+00:00): Merhaba, eklediğiniz hattın kendileri ya da kalıntıları hâlâ mevcut mu? Yani ilgili yere gittiğinizde bu eski hatların varlığı gözle görülebiliyor mu?
Udarian (2026-04-23 18:29:17+00:00): next time please leave a better changeset comment describing what you did in the changeset, for this changeset something like "fixed various iD validation issues" would have been sufficient. For more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Happy mapping,
Udar.
goodidea (2026-06-19 19:33:07+00:00): Hallo!

Kleine Bemerkungen zu deiner Bearbeitung am Rathaus-Carrée (siehe auch Bemerkungen zu Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181724719!) – die Situation dort ist wirklich komplex …

Du hast dort mit Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1502881591 ein neues Gebäude mit building=retail hinzugefügt. Das kann man dort aber aus mehreren Gründen nicht so machen … V.a. weil es kein eigenständiges Gebäude ist, sondern Teil des Rathaus-Carrées (siehe Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89024220)! name=Bahnhofstr. 28;Betzenstr. 5/ 5, 9): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1502881591 geht so auch nicht … Siehe Infos zum name-Tag im Wiki. 

Die Betzenstraßen-Hausnummern waren ja bereits als Adress-Knoten angelegt. addr:housenumber=28 und addr:street=Betzenstraße stimmten auch nicht, Wenn, dann ist HN 28 Bahnhofstraße (ich hab das jetzt mal als Adressknoten anlegt). building:levels=4 stimmt da auch nicht; es sind 5 (und das ist schon beim building:part vom Rathaus-Carrée angegeben, der auch diesen Teil umfasst). height=12 kann dann wohl auch nicht stimmen …

Hat mich einige Zeit gekostet, durchzublicken, was da geändert wurde etc. Also da ist so viel falsch, dass ich mich entschieden habe, die ganze Outline zu löschen (siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184329421). Sie ist überflüssig, weil alles schon durch andere Outlines und v.a. building:part vom Rathaus-Carrée abgedeckt ist. Schau es dir vielleicht nochmal genauer an …

Viele Grüße!
Wildsharky (2026-04-28 10:51:47+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181768696
Erelen (2026-04-23 15:08:56+00:00): Do you have any actual ground-truth confirmation about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1502882807?

Pay attention to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181624380
Stadtigel (2026-04-29 14:41:21+00:00): Thanks for your note!
The basis for my edit was the GPX file from the PSS website (https://pss.rs/terenipp/e7-5/) and Google-Streetview: https://www.google.de/maps/place/45%C2%B012'25.5%22N+19%C2%B053'51.6%22E/@45.2070715,19.8976653,3a,75y,144.43h,82.67t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1srkcQvEiijTbY0n_YbOd-7g!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D7.334809015104909%26panoid%3DrkcQvEiijTbY0n_YbOd-7g%26yaw%3D144.43337192955772!7i13312!8i6656!4m4!3m3!8m2!3d45.2070702!4d19.8976519
Wildsharky (2026-04-28 10:49:59+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181762791
NorthCrab_upload (2026-04-23 23:53:49+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/824417697

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MappingMore (2026-04-24 15:04:37+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181770399
Wildsharky (2026-04-28 10:52:45+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181746388
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-04-26 14:21:07+00:00): أستاذي الكريم يا هلا وسهلا بك كمحرر في الخريطة  
الأماكن الشخصية والخاصة والغير عامة لا يصح تواجدها هنا في خريطة الشارع المفتوحة
Ksa2030 (2026-04-26 14:33:06+00:00): يامرحبا اخوي هذا مكان عام مو خاص ويمكن لأي شخص انه يدخله مو مخصص
aboc (2026-04-23 15:19:44+00:00): Questo changeset reverta le classificazioni delle ex strade statali dei changeset 125115737, 161563206, e 161563754
I-76 (2026-04-23 15:17:48+00:00): 2000!
OSMaper_xD (2026-04-23 15:21:30+00:00): *DK7
Wally_PL (2026-04-23 15:57:29+00:00): To jest tymczasowe zamknięcie wjazdu, a nie na stałe. Zmianę wycofuję.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181725784
SurlyRider (2026-06-18 13:09:11+00:00): Hi, du hast an diesem Way ein verbot für den Fußverkehr getagged. Woran machst du das Verbot fest? In den letzten 6 Jahren hing da kein Verbotszeichen... Hängt dort jetzt eines?