piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2024-03-28 17:10:26+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects, However, mapped with an offset. Did you not use the BING imagery ? 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149279052
Frans S (2024-03-28 17:08:12+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149279074
Frans S (2024-03-28 17:07:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
One of the validator jobs is to reviews the taggings of highways .  Experience earns that traces of highways are regularly wrong tagged.

How to decide when a trace is a path or an unclassified highway (main choices in rural areas)
First, look what they connect.  Houses, settlements, villages. Then measure the width of that trace.

In iDeditor 

Shortcut : Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle  opens measurement panel
Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.
If a trace is max 2 meters wide, tag it as a path.
Wider and connect hamlets, houses and villages should be tagged as unclassified.
Tag residential in urban areas (villages, towns)

In JOSM, use the measure tab or, draw a circle (round building, shortcut Alt-Z when the building plugin is installed)) between the shoulders of a trace and read the distance on the lower toolbar. (don't map that bulding)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
This is mentioned about tracks on the
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routing#Routing_considerations

Quote: Tracks are roads of agricultural purpose. They usually connect fields to farms. The surface sometimes makes them inaccessible for regular cars, or at least limits the speeds to a very slow pace. Tracks should always be avoided for through-going traffic or within urban areas.

Best regards
Frans S (2024-03-28 17:05:49+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
One of the validator jobs is to reviews the taggings of highways .  Experience earns that traces of highways are regularly wrong tagged.

How to decide when a trace is a path or an unclassified highway (main choices in rural areas)
First, look what they connect.  Houses, settlements, villages. Then measure the width of that trace.

In iDeditor 

Shortcut : Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle  opens measurement panel
Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.
If a trace is max 2 meters wide, tag it as a path.
Wider and connect hamlets, houses and villages should be tagged as unclassified.
Tag residential in urban areas (villages, towns)

In JOSM, use the measure tab or, draw a circle (round building, shortcut Alt-Z when the building plugin is installed)) between the shoulders of a trace and read the distance on the lower toolbar. (don't map that bulding)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
This is mentioned about tracks on the
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routing#Routing_considerations

Quote: Tracks are roads of agricultural purpose. They usually connect fields to farms. The surface sometimes makes them inaccessible for regular cars, or at least limits the speeds to a very slow pace. Tracks should always be avoided for through-going traffic or within urban areas.

Best regards
hoserab (2024-03-28 19:33:55+00:00): Hello Evbot99,

Per my comment on changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149133786, once again, can you please reduce the size of your changes?

I also noticed some changes you've made here are, frankly, fictitious. E.g. this section of 101st Ave in Edmonton: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1267170630

It does not, and never did, exist like that. Can you please substantiate your sources? The changeset says you were using Esri imagery, but the Esri imgaery doesn't show this road...
Frans S (2024-03-28 17:19:12+00:00): Important. Please connect highways to each other to get a network which can be used by GPS NAV systems.
Frans S (2024-03-28 17:34:23+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
One of the validator jobs is to reviews the taggings of highways .  Experience learns that traces of highways are regularly wrong tagged.

How to decide when a trace is a path or an unclassified highway (main choices in rural areas)
First, look what they connect.  Houses, settlements, villages. Then measure the width of that trace.

In iDeditor 

Shortcut : Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle  opens measurement panel
Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.
If a trace is max 2 meters wide, tag it as a path. Use footway only in urban (town) areas.
Wider and connect hamlets, houses and villages should be tagged as unclassified.
Tag residential in urban areas (villages, towns)

In JOSM, use the measure tab or, draw a circle (round building, shortcut Alt-Z when the building plugin is installed)) between the shoulders of a trace and read the distance on the lower toolbar. (don't map that bulding)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
This is mentioned about tracks on the
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routing#Routing_considerations

Quote: Tracks are roads of agricultural purpose. They usually connect fields to farms. The surface sometimes makes them inaccessible for regular cars, or at least limits the speeds to a very slow pace. Tracks should always be avoided for through-going traffic or within urban areas.

Important. Please connect highways to each other, where obvious,  to get a network which can be used by GPS NAV systems.

Best regards
Frans S (2024-03-28 17:33:48+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149279856
Dawid2849 (2024-03-29 11:15:01+00:00): ooo, no w końcu nazwa tego parku ma sens... choć miasto by się mogło zdecydować, czy chce używać formy "Rożnówka", czy jednak wolą "Różnówka". W każdym razie dzięki za aktualizację!
Frans S (2024-03-28 17:33:15+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Very odd mapped.
A building is mostly just a rectangular. ( 4 or 6 nodes)
Please check your principle knowledge how to map.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149279902
Frans S (2024-03-28 17:31:42+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings regularly inaccurate mapped.
Many buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149280157
Leo Slager (2024-03-29 00:01:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-03-29 00:07:59+00:00): Dag QTTT06,
Je vraagt om een review:
De wijzigingen zien er erg goed uit.
Je zou zeggen dat je eerdere ervaring met OSM hebt.
De changeset is wel aan de grote kant. Dat brengt het gevaar met zich dat je onbedoeld een punt kunt verslepen over de halve provincie.
In dit geval zou ik het in drie changesets gedaan hebben:
1x in de ongeving van Vlissingen,
1x omgeving Goes
1x omgeving Sloegebied.
Dat maakt een review/controle ook veel makkelijker.
literan (2024-07-25 20:22:18+00:00): зачем-то накрыли дорогу полигоном heath. На автодорогах не растет вереск.
fedoroff net (2024-08-02 08:20:09+00:00): что за бред, при чём тут вереск, изучайте географию
fedoroff net (2024-08-02 08:24:09+00:00): а я понял, ещё один фанат белых карт. Вот из-за таких как вы чистильщиков карта белая.
fedoroff net (2024-08-02 08:29:32+00:00): ПУСТОШЬ — невозделанный или заброшенный участок земли с очень бедными почвами в лесной зоне, лесотундре или верхних поясах гор. Обычно это вырубки, реже гари. В зависимости от состава вторичной растительности различают травянистые, лишайниковые, моховые и кустарничковые пустоши, характерны брусничники, верещатники, травы — вейник, иван-чай и другие. Например, Люнебургская пустош на севере Германии, в России на месте вырубленных сосновых лесов боровые лишайниковые пустоши, на месте истощенных суходольных лугов травянистые пустоши. Сходные ландшафты встречаются на юге Африки и Австралии.
fedoroff net (2024-08-02 08:30:03+00:00): в википедии неправильное описание
fedoroff net (2024-08-02 08:30:39+00:00): вересковая пустошь - частная форма пустоши
fedoroff net (2024-08-02 08:31:40+00:00): вот плохо, когда программисты лезут области, где ничего не понимают.
mat (2024-03-29 06:19:21+00:00): Bonjour, la route que vous avez ajouté est indiquée en construction, y-a-t-il une date de fin de prévue pour les travaux ?
frantz58 (2024-03-30 18:23:28+00:00): Bonjour, l'ouverture est prévue pour fin 2024, mais je n'ai malheureusement pas plus d'informations.

Bonne soirée à vous
Frans S (2024-03-29 09:17:15+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped. All buildings more or less rectangular. 

No extensions mapped.

Nodes connected to each other

Buildings overlap.
Sorry. These buildings need to be mapped more precisely.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149280499
Frans S (2024-03-29 09:31:45+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Poorly mapped buildings.
Connected buildings to highways.
Highways should be connected to each other. 
Wrong tagging used on highways.

Need to be mapped all over with correct taggings.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149280584
aTarom (2024-03-28 18:37:45+00:00): hola, gracias por editar, cuando puedas revisa este nodo que se ha quedado así
"fte. del Cervunal"="watering_place"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3113072191/history
no estoy seguro si se debe eliminar por ser "duplicado" quizás de
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/287586540/history
?
Saludos
Enock4seth (2024-03-28 20:37:47+00:00): Hi, welcome and thanks for mapping. One feature in should be mapped once and only once in OpenStreetMap. There already exits a school area so there's no need to add a node and name the school again.

Also use title cases for names not ALL CAPTS
Kai Johnson (2024-08-22 15:31:02+00:00): Hi! It's great that you're mapping lots of features out in the desert. There are a lot of things out there that still need to be mapped. But when you're mapping in Wilderness areas, please add access conditions so that routers don't direct vehicles into these areas. I like disused:highway=track + highway=path + bicycle=no, but you could also use highway=track + motor_vehicle=no + bicycle= no for cases like this.
BryanOSullivan (2024-08-22 18:04:06+00:00): Thanks. That’s a good suggestion.
Kai Johnson (2024-08-26 15:17:34+00:00): Great! Keep up the good mapping!
HellMap (2024-03-28 21:14:16+00:00): Hello,

Just wanted to let you know that we don't generally specify access values unless they are different from default or ambiguous. All (non-sidewalk) footways and other paths and roads in Latvia imply bicycle=yes by default unless there is some restriction. This is like they imply foot=yes or kick_scooter=yes or stroller=yes, etc. which we wouldn't all add here one at a time.

Thanks
richlv (2024-03-29 10:56:19+00:00): Could this have been prompted by some routing applications not routing on footways/paths?
manijs (2024-03-29 13:04:34+00:00): I encountered issues, when cycling there. The route wanted to take me on the car path, although there is a perfectly safe and convenient under pass the bridge. 
@HellMap, I’ll take a look at this, since some places when explicitly allowing bike, OsmAnd then routed correctly.
HellMap (2024-03-29 13:28:49+00:00): Urgh, I just realized someone put incorrect `bicycle=dismount` on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/91301229 and nearby , which causes most routers to go around. And this has been here for years... I will fix this.

But, yes, broadly speaking, this is a difficult issue with routers. It is technically OsmAnd's fault - they should just route on the footways and `bicycle=yes` shouldn't change anything. Otherwise we'd have to add bicycle=yes to tens of thousands of footways across just Latvia.

The vast majority of footways in Latvia don't have any cycling infrastructure or signs. Like almost all these footways here along the bridge - they are the main ways that cyclists use across it, but none of them have any cycleway signage, so legally they are just footways.

I don't really have a solution for this. If we know that routers are having serious problems here, we can add `bicycle=yes` and a `note` that it is needed for routing. But it is really the routers that need to fix their cycling profiles. OsmAnd's profile really should not prefer a primary road over even a long detour over footways.
Leo Slager (2024-03-29 00:11:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
NieWnen (2024-03-28 23:12:23+00:00): Chyba trochę za szeroka ta kładka ;)
VA00 (2024-05-01 18:44:14+00:00): Droga https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1267192179 NIE ISTNIEJE na całej długości. Nie ma jej w terenie, nie ma na żadnych zdj. sat. a miejscowi twierdzą, że nie ma tędy połączenia od dziesiątek lat. Są za to wkurzeni kurierzy. Co gorsza, została ustawiona jako grade1, co powoduje, że nawigacje rowerowe mogą ją traktować z wyższym priorytetem niż równoległa droga wojewódzka! Proszę o więcej staranności, zwłaszcza gdy dodaje się nowy tranzyt. Tą jedną drogę poprawię zgodnie ze stanem faktycznym, ale w zestawie zmian widzę 250 nowych linii - czy wszystkie mam traktować jako równie niewiarygodne?
Władysław Komorek (2024-05-02 06:32:25+00:00): Dla #osmp;#update;#maproulette usuwałem "Bing".
rskedgell (2024-03-29 09:15:59+00:00): Thanks for updating this. You could also add ownership=private to further clarify the situation.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ownership
Icircuit (2024-03-28 20:02:07+00:00): There are two hueco climbing rooms, hueco in the suburbs of strasbourg and hueco city which is in the center of the city near the train station. Both have the same name so it isnt possible to distinguish them. This has been fixed in my edit.

Pls let me know if you want me to change smth.
Famlam (2024-03-29 22:57:09+00:00): Hoi,

Betreffende deze twee objecten:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1267199461
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2636925880

Ik vermoed dat het pad pas vlak ná het hek aansluit bij het andere pad, klopt dit? 
Met andere woorden, als ik over weg 1267199461 richting het westen loop en dan rechtsaf sla, dan hoef ik vermoedelijk niet door het hek (node 2636925880)

In dat geval moet het pad vlak achter het hek aangesloten worden.
Nikkle28 (2024-03-30 17:29:49+00:00): Ja je hebt helemaal gelijk ik ga het aanpassen
pyrog (2025-09-04 16:53:38+00:00): Bonjour Rob,

Les poteaux ne se mettent pas sur le carrefour mais à leur position réelle (ou approximative, dans le 2 m par exemple).

Pour info il existe depuis peu en France un MNT issu des mesures LiDAR HD de l'IGN.
Il permet de tracer les pistes forestières et sentiers en forêt.
Cette couche est accessible dans iD et JOSM (en fait 2 couches : IGN LIDAR-HD MNT ELEVATION et MNS LIDAR HD IGN.

Cordialement,
Yves — Groupe OSM Plein Air

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8310860878#map=19/45.774243/6.512334&layers=P
grzegorz75jan (2024-03-28 20:15:50+00:00): Gdy narysujesz np. budynek to po zaznaczeniu takiego obrysu można nacisnąć [Q] na klawiaturze i w takim obrysie zostaną zostanie poprawiona prostopadłość oraz kąty.
W warstwach możesz wyświetlić ewidencję budynków i pojawią się urzędowe obrysy budynków i możesz wykonać obrys na ich podstawie. Zamiast kwadraciaka będzie fikuśny obrys.

Kolejny raz bejtam o sensowniejsze opisy zmian https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
goldfndr (2024-07-07 13:27:47+00:00): way 448424134?
TheDutchMan13 (2024-07-07 17:52:03+00:00): What's wrong with it?
goldfndr (2025-03-22 19:03:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448424134/history

It now has exactly one tag instead of no tags.
TheDutchMan13 (2025-03-22 19:14:34+00:00): Fixed.
goldfndr (2026-01-24 08:22:19+00:00): Not really fixed. 381101918 is a chain link fence. There are many others.
TheDutchMan13 (2026-01-24 15:09:33+00:00): Your welcome to undue them, it was a mistake of mine to do this mass change set in the first place. I apologize.
tekim (2024-03-28 21:46:55+00:00): Hello, Thanks for your edits of the map.  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Maps when editing OpenStreetMap due to Google's terms of use.
tekim (2024-03-28 21:48:23+00:00): This is being reverted because it used a source that is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149288717
Murgrim (2024-03-28 22:05:35+00:00): Hi tekim, 
sorry, my fault. I didn't know the Google Maps thing. It's too stupid, that i just looked for one small detail on google maps. I just wanted to be sure, that I've seen it correctly. Is there a chance to save the changes, that are not affected by my Google maps detail?
tekim (2024-03-28 22:45:04+00:00): Hi Murgrim,  Thanks for the reply.  Generally, unless something is in the public domain (sorry if that is a US-specific term), or we have explicit permission to use it (like Bing aerial imagery), it can't be used to edit OSM. It should be possible to get the XML from your changeset, pull it into JOSM, where you can remove the stuff that was from Google Maps and then upload.  I haven't done this before but can try to help.
goldfndr (2026-01-04 19:42:39+00:00): Somehow https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/602186371/history got tagged even though there were no address tags.
TheDutchMan13 (2026-01-04 22:23:41+00:00): I fixed it thanks.
goldfndr (2026-06-09 09:32:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53656794 ?
DressyPear4 (2024-03-29 03:07:48+00:00): Olá, verifique as vias que estão ficando desconectadas antes de enviar para o servidor
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149285491
Hufkratzer (2024-03-28 22:15:24+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1267214160 is not a riding centre (tag leisure=horse_riding), it is a riding arena. The tags should be leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, like here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/983885742 (this arena is part of riding centre https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/983885745). Compare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
Filipny (2024-03-29 08:42:08+00:00): Thanks for noticing, fixed
NeisBot (2024-03-28 20:34:02+00:00): Hello StrikeMind, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
StrikeMind (2024-03-29 01:28:06+00:00): Thank you, NeisBot. I'm not sure how this changeset was created. I was active during that time using Street Complete and Every Door however I cannot find this changeset in my history. I also don't understand what I could've been doing in Every Door to have created it.
miluethi (2024-04-09 01:01:55+00:00): Hi Alexandria. Thank you for contributing to OSM. Please draw building shapes just for the buildings, your shapes are much too big. Thank you.
PPete2 (2024-06-14 07:59:02+00:00): Hallo Bergi76, könntest du bitte den Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4284360 kommentieren. Da wird behauptet du hast in der Vergangenheit diverse Wege, Pfade gelöscht, die in der Realität noch vorhanden sind. Außerdem habe ich gesehen, dass du in der Vergangenheit manchmal Waldwege z.b. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1222971066/history mit "access"=privat getaggt hast, was wohl nicht richtig ist, da zumindest der Zugang zu Fuß im Wald für jedermann frei ist, oder?