piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2023-06-10 20:13:58+00:00): Moin Heiko,

du hast gerade viele Wege bearbeitet und dort sehr spezifische Zugangsberechtigungen (allg. "access" genannt) gesetzt. Diese werden an Wegen idR entsprechend der rechtlichen Gegebenheiten vor Ort gesetzt (zB anhand der offiziellen Beschilderung) und sollen nicht wiedergeben, was man denkt, was hier noch entlang könnte. Details dazu bietet dieser Artikel des Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

Die Beschaffenheit der Wege kann sehr gut mit Hilfe vieler verschiedener anderer Tags angegeben werden. Hier eine, vermutlich nicht vollständige, Auswahl:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:smoothness
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:sac_scale
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:trail_visibility
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:mtb:scale
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:horse_scale

Ich empfehle zunächst eine Lektüre dieser Artikel bevor du weitere Wege bearbeitest. Außerdem wäre es sehr hilfreich, wenn du die bisher von dir bearbeiteten Wege noch einmal anhand dieser neuen Informationen kontrollierst.

Außerdem wird ein Weg, nur weil er gesperrt ist, nicht gelöscht. So lange etwas vorhanden ist, bleibt es auch in der Datenbank. Die Eigenschaften werden dann entprechend der Situation vor Ort angepasst, aber bitte erst gelöscht, wenn es wirklich weg ist (und auch nicht mehr auf den uns zur Verfügung stehenden Luftbildern zu sehen ist).

Bei Fragen, immer raus damit :)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers

cheers
silversurfer83
heiko777 (2023-06-12 06:00:01+00:00): Hallo Silversurfer83,

vielen Dank! Ich schaue mir diese Artikel an.

Der hier markierte Weg ist ein reiner Feldweg, der nicht als Rad- oder Wanderweg markiert ist. Dementsprechend wird er auch nicht gepflegt. Wenn es irgendeine andere Möglichkeit gibt, dass ein Navi für Wanderer oder MTBs diesen nicht mehr auswählt, dann wähle ich natürlich lieber diese.

Der gelöschte Weg (nicht dieser hier, sondern an anderer Stelle) ist tatsächlich nicht mehr vorhanden und ist auch per Satellitenbilder nicht mehr auszumachen.
An dieser Stelle gibt es 2 parallele Wege. Einer ist wegen Aufforstung eingezäunt. Diesen habe ich als privat gekennzeichnet.
Der parallele Weg am Waldrand ist nicht mehr vorhanden, ist zugewachsen und durch reichlich Geäst versperrt. Er wird demnach seit Jahren nicht mehr genutzt.

Gruß

Heiko
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-01 11:51:09+00:00): Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4785024 ?

(maybe other ways from that edit are also affected)
tyfi (2023-06-10 19:06:50+00:00): The roads themselves are named East Dade XX, North Dade YY, etc. The number is in the road name, but that does not make them "routes" in the sense of Missouri's route network.
DanJones000 (2024-02-27 20:52:34+00:00): I noticed this change on a basin I mapped a couple years ago.

I was just curious, what exactly was the problem that the previous change caused that you were fixing?

I can see that the previous commit changed landuse:basin to natural:water and water:basin.

What problem did that change cause?
antiviro (2024-05-11 18:40:37+00:00): Much of the region is marked as basin when that is not its actual usage. I wasn't specifically changing landuse:basin to natural:water and water:basin, but rather mapping how the land is actually used. many areas in this region serve as overflow in extreme weather events, but thats only once every few years, as opposed to it recreational use pretty much every day.

However, it has become irrelevant as an arrogant mapper living in a different part of the US thinks he knows more than people actually living in this area. So, I'm no longer contributing to OSM. I only logged in today to check a classification on something that looked odd near me.
silversurfer83 (2023-06-10 20:39:17+00:00): Hi :)

"survey" is a good source but it isn't a good change set comment.

PLEASE read this and act accordingly. Thank you
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Alexia Schoonjans (2023-06-13 19:48:52+00:00): Bonjour @PaCeLaVa.

Pourquoi as-tu effacé le tunnel ?
Il a été détruit ?  Je n’ai pas trouvé l’info.

Cette « route inexistante », c’est le tunnel de service de 1,2 km construit vers 2002 entre la CCB et la carrière du Milieu, il sert pour les camions.

Quelles sont les dernières infos ?
tyfi (2023-06-10 19:41:11+00:00): Some of the ways were named "State Road H" and others simply "Route H". While they all had ref tags, this designation refers to the *route*, not the *road*. So I added a route relation and tagged the ways with noname=yes.

AIUI The road itself is unnamed, but state route H follows the road.
Enock4seth (2023-06-10 22:03:10+00:00): The brand of the pharmacy is not Pharmacy
VictorIE (2023-06-15 18:49:50+00:00): Hi!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1181019362

Welcome to OSM.

Under 50 kV uses power=minor_line.

Over 50 kV uses power=line

If a line has been removed, you can use abandoned:power=minor_line. or abandoned:power=line and demolished:power=substation,  demolished:power=pole, etc. for structures.
VictorIE (2023-06-15 18:50:18+00:00): This may be of interest https://openinframap.org/#6.37/53.388/-7.988
PluMGMK (2023-06-17 12:43:41+00:00): Gotcha, thanks for the info! Indeed, I think I realized my mistake with the minor/major distinction pretty soon. Did I miss some that I had misclassified?

The abandoned / demolished concept makes a lot of sense, I should have realized that sooner…
VictorIE (2023-06-17 13:29:04+00:00): Seems fine now.

I run a script about once a week to pick up tagging errors, so it isn't a major issue.

Note that most features have an OSM wiki page, e.g. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power=tower
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-10 20:20:19+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159443164

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
CurlingMan13 (2023-06-11 06:06:34+00:00): Please use more descriptive changeset comments.  What did you do?  Why?  etc.?  "Yes" tells me nothing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137184832
silversurfer83 (2023-06-11 07:19:14+00:00): Moin :)
ist soweit ok. Dein Kommentar "nix für Rennräder" kann möglicherweise über folgende Eigenschaften erfasst werden, die am besten vor Ort kontrolliiert wurden:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:smoothness
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:mtb:scale
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:class:bicycle

Was genau da nun passt kannst du nach Lektüre der deutschen (und, falls du es gut genug sprichst auch der englischen) Wikiartikel als Person mit Vor Ort Kenntniss am Besten entscheiden :)

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137184947
CurlingMan13 (2023-06-11 06:06:30+00:00): Please use more descriptive changeset comments.  What did you do?  Why?  etc.?  "Yes" tells me nothing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137185024
silversurfer83 (2023-06-11 07:25:46+00:00): Hi
was mir noch fehlt bei deinen Änderungen: Eine Quellenangabe. Kannst du in deinem Editor, wenn du den Kommentar eintippst direkt unter dem Kommentar als zusätzliches Feld ergänzen. So wie ich das bisher einschätze dürfte "erfassung vor Ort" bzw. "survey" häufig gut passen. Wenn du deine Information von anderer Stelle hast, dann gib das bitte entsprechend an.

Zu dem Weg gilt das Gleiche, wie zu der Änderung davor. Wenn er noch erkennbar ist, aber für keine Verkehrsteilnehmer mehr passierbar, dann kann man ggf. noch ein "abandoned=yes" dran machen. Das bedeutet, dass erst wieder Arbeit in den Weg gesteckt werden muss, dass er "funktioniert".
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

schönen Sonntag
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137185031
christophenglert (2023-06-22 06:13:51+00:00): ah ok, werde mal drauf achten, dass entsprechende Feld zu finden. die Option abandoned=yes klingt in dem Fall mehr als zutreffend!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137185031
silversurfer83 (2023-06-22 06:39:43+00:00): In dem in die Webseite eingebauten Editor (heißt iD) kann es sein, dass es das Feld in den Vorgaben nicht gibt. Du kannst aber, wenn du ein Objekt ausgewählt hast, in der Spalte links ganz nach unten scrollen bis du zum Abschnitt "Eigenschaften" kommst. Da sind im Klartext (dann idR auf englisch) alle Eigenschaften entweder als Freitext oder als Tabelle zu sehen. Da kannst du dann einfach eine neue Zeile anlegen und beliebige Werte eingeben.
pyrog (2025-11-10 08:35:26+00:00): Bonjour,
Tu avais cassé la continuité de la Traversée de Paris n°2 au Buttes Chaumont dans ce changeset.
(Et c'est toi même qui l'avais créé en version 38).

Je corriges.

Cordialement,
Yves — Groupe OSM Plein Air
Esperanza36 (2025-11-10 12:38:16+00:00): Bonjour,  effectivement il n'y a plus de balisage cohérent des deux GRP depuis les travaux dans ce parc.
ianlopez1115 (2023-06-16 16:00:17+00:00): Aside from way 770910869 which may have been overlooked (no changes to speed limit), changeset looks okay to me.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137185135
bsvka (2023-07-07 09:55:26+00:00): Hey Fabian,

Du hast in diesem und älteren Changesets viele Adressen dupliziert.

Adressen sollten im Idealfall als Node auf dem Gebäudeumriss inklusive Eingangstür-Tags gemappt werden.
Sollte das nicht möglich/zu aufwändig sein, werden sie mit dem entsprechenden Gebäude zusammen erfasst (in dieser Region so gemacht).
Nur wenn die oberen beiden Mapping-Arten nicht gemacht sind/gemacht werden können, sollen die Adressen als eigenständige Nodes an der richtigen Stelle gemappt werden.

Ich habe deine Duplikate in changeset/138221934 wieder gelöscht.
Mir ist dabei aufgefallen, dass Du an Orten "Wil SG, 9500" angegeben hast, an denen per GWR Bronschhofen ist.

Falls du in Zukunft Adressen hinzufügen wills, kannst du dich auch direkt bei https://qa.poole.ch/addresses/ch/ bedienen, da findest du aufgearbeitete GWR exports.
(Die Daten des GWRs sind aber nich "heilig", auch da können Fehler enthalten sein.)

LG
csomerville (2023-06-11 11:07:53+00:00): Greetings and thank you for your contributions. 

Some feedback on this changeset:

1. Generally you would not map landuse on a block by block basis unless each block has in fact different landuse classification. Often the area mapped as landuse=residential is a meaningful contiguous residential area or alternatively may cover a particular residential neighborhood if it has a distinct identity and/or boundaries.

2. The name tag on an individually mapped tree is generally incorrect. It should not be used when the object is unnamed or only has a generic non-specific name.

3. Please try to keep edits localized to one particular area. Splitting up changes between distant geographical locations into separate changesets is a best practice. 

I also recommend checking out the following wiki pages: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

Based on some of your other recent changesets, I also want to encourage you to check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_aerial_imagery - specifically info on offsets.
Javier Sanchez (2023-06-13 16:17:35+00:00): Hola
Recuerda que al importar edificios, en lugar de eliminar los edificios existentes debes sustituir el viejo por el nuevo (en JOSM Ctrl+Mayus+G o Más Herramientas>Reemplazar geometría) para que se conserve el historial y respetar las aportaciones de los editores previos.
N Armas_import (2023-06-13 16:23:01+00:00): Si, disculpa, fue un fallo de concepto. Ya sé como funciona esa parte. Un saludo y gracias por la ayuda.
Frans S (2023-06-11 10:31:22+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
Previous mappings (4 years old) show also buildings with offset or without proof it is a building. Please correct them as well.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137186226
Alexmol (2023-11-27 21:44:48+00:00): Alô.
Marcaste esta como DIGI, chegaste a ver equipamentos DIGI?
Há uma NOS 23145 que pode ser nesse local.
m2fc (2023-11-28 04:17:55+00:00): oi,
não me lembro. ja foi ha demasiado tempo. faz o que achares melhor.
m2fc (2023-11-29 09:37:52+00:00): já agora, podes mudar o quer que seja que tenha adicionado/modificado. não precisas de estar sempre a perguntar.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-10 21:40:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Akacjowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10968296296

"Skargi":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10968296302

"Kolejowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10968296455

"Osiedle Wichrowe Wzgórze":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10968296475

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
gurglypipe (2023-06-11 20:55:25+00:00): Out of interest, why change https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100817341 from highway=cycleway to highway=path?
tyfi (2023-06-10 21:52:06+00:00): The southern terminus of MO 39 is defined by the state border, so I felt it appropriate to glue it there.
tyfi (2023-06-10 21:52:18+00:00): I also added Wikidata and Wikipedia links for MO 39.
tyfi (2023-06-10 21:58:58+00:00): I removed the "State Highway 39" name tag from the ways and replaced it with noname=yes since that is a route designation, not the road name.
ftcat (2023-06-11 05:08:45+00:00): Charles,

Please stop guessing, I know for a fact that PearliWhite Dental accept payment by card. There is no way you are physically checking all these places you claim to. You are adding nonsense tags to restaurants such as chicken and pizza cuisine to sushi restaurants which is obviously wrong. The way you are mapping makes the accuracy of the map data worse not better and will mean that people will not trust even the accurate data.

You insist on removing card payment data from fuel stations or adding very specific card brands. Nearly every fuel station I have used recently in Lusaka accepts card payments, especially the well known brands such as TotalEnergies, Puma and Rubis.

Just add information that you know is correct.

You are editing a large number of points at one time, some of them are fine as they are. Schools in Zambia are generally non religious, particularly government ones, therefore the tag multifaith is pointless and misleading.
ftcat (2023-06-11 05:48:24+00:00): Dr Agarwals does have wheelchair access
kapazao (2023-06-11 08:49:25+00:00): Hola, ya existía un hotel llamada NH Inglaterra justo al lado. ¿Son distintos, el que has añadido está bien situado?
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137186915
polkillas (2023-06-13 09:12:38+00:00): Vaya, lo comprobé en el mapa de Osmand y no aparecía. La localización donde lo puse sí es la correcta, he combinado los dos nodos. Gracias por el aviso.
Interswd (2025-02-25 19:45:36+00:00): W Chałupkach zaznaczone są dwa tory 19, możesz to sprawdzić. pozdrowienia
Anas masuris (2025-02-25 19:48:38+00:00): Faktycznie - powinien to być tor 17, poprawione!
VictorIE (2025-03-24 10:54:26+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/84152033

Can cars actually use Garden Row? Is it wide enough?
b-unicycling (2025-03-25 13:15:08+00:00): Yes, they can. I have been in a car driven from William Street around the corner into Garden Row and out Friary Street. Frightening,  but possible.
Ropino (2023-06-15 18:51:14+00:00): Hi,
highway=U ?
Please check/correct.
Thx in advance.
kaartense (2023-06-15 20:25:15+00:00): Hi Ropino,

Thank you for letting me know. I've just corrected them.

Best
AaronFitz (2023-06-25 08:18:16+00:00): Hello mapper!  In this recent edit, you mention that this way is state-owned and inaccessible.  To reflect this in OSM, there are Allowed Access settings (foot, auto, bicycle, etc) that can be changed without removing data that exists in the town's official maps.  If you'd like more info, check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate
Thanks for your contributions!
Glassman (2023-06-11 00:26:51+00:00): Can you review this edit? aeroway=jet_bridge + highway=corridor is the documented way of adding jet ways. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Djet_bridge. Let me know if you have any questions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137188324
Glassman (2023-07-03 00:15:11+00:00): You didn't respond so I reverted this changeset. aeroway=jet_bridge is the correct tag for the jet bridge.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137188324
tyfi (2023-06-11 00:08:42+00:00): Dogwood Tree Road*
Glassman (2023-07-03 00:17:24+00:00): This edit has been reverted. Correct usage is aeroway=jet_bridge
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137188466
ikopanjirukmana (2023-06-12 02:31:08+00:00): Hi,
Terima kasih sudah menambahkan data di OSM!
namun ada masukan dari saya terkait data yang kamu buat. 

saya lihat kamu menambahkan keterangan tambahan seperti "deskripsi" dan "nama" suatu tempat tapi kamu menambahkannya pada titik jalan. kalau bisa kamu membuat titik tersendiri dan terpisah dari jalan. karena secara tidak langsung keterangan ini akan menempel dijalan dan menyebabkan miss komunikasi.

jika ada yang ingin ditanyakan silahkan untuk meghubungi saya
Terima kasih
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137188540
Enock4seth (2023-06-11 13:06:24+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for mapping. Use title case for names i.e Atorkor Roman Catholic Church, I am sure the name should have something like St. Name though.

Also don't delete existing objects and retrace them completely instead align/move where possible. 

Happy Mapping!
LockOnGuy (2023-06-11 11:53:09+00:00): Hello, Thank you for your edit. Can you please share the source you used?    
Regards.
LockOnGuy (2023-06-11 11:55:46+00:00): I see you changed the gate numbers from the actual numbers to codes, keep in mind the gate have actual numbers not codes, see: https://kalimaiq.com/static/uploads/contents/thumb_16818210454e09a0bf1c941c7bd37f0382222064ff.jpeg    
So please provide a source otherwise I will revert. Thank you.
LockOnGuy (2023-06-12 06:17:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in changeset 137228824 and the changeset comment is: revert changeset 137188748, user change valid gate numbers I witnessed in person to codes without providing a source and did not answer the comment when asked for source.
Anaximandre (2023-06-11 22:21:41+00:00): Bonjour @ANSELIN,
Merci pour vos ajouts sur OpenStreetMap !  En l'état, cela apparaît sur la carte comme une corbeille publique avec comme  nom de corbeille "embarcadère". Serait-il possible de préciser ce que vous souhaitez cartographier ?
docjay (2023-06-11 12:40:19+00:00): Nice work adding in a lot of buildings and details in the area. Unfortunately this changeset introduces some problems by removing existing ways that were mapped, breaking sidewalk connections, removing history by deleting and replacing existing features, and removing detailed tags about surfaces, operational periods and other details.
dmich9 (2023-06-11 13:00:52+00:00): Hi Jay! I’ve made sure that all features I delete do not have any extra tags other than building=yes, and I’ve been careful to keep any relations and tags that already existed. The reason I delete buildings is because most of the Charlotte ones are from a Microsoft import that is very inaccurate, and it’d be super time consuming to take those existing areas and add nodes to them and drag them and everything. I am also currently in the process of remapping all of the sidewalks in Charlotte, as I mainly do pedestrian work, and a lot of the old data is innacurate, hence why I delete it. If I break a connection, it will always be added back to my new network within the day. I know that this is not a perfect method, however it significantly speeds up the editing process and since OSM is a pastime for me, I like to be efficient with it. I also have plans to add addresses and POIs to uptown once all the pedestrian routing and ways are added, though that won’t be for a few days. Thanks, -dmich9
docjay (2023-06-11 14:54:36+00:00): Wow, fast response!

I think deleting and redrawing features is less desirable from OSM guidelines on keeping history but it’s not a big deal when there was just a basic outline to begin with or the routing is just temporarily broken. I am concerned about how it can bring some issues, for example losing info that isn’t carried to new geometry or features that get overlooked in redrawing.

As an example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/864040209/history was deleted but the detail tags didn’t make it to the new geometry. Or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1180249804/history was deleted without any replacement. There are others like this, and sorting out which is good/bad becomes difficult without being able to track history of a feature.

I do look forward to seeing your Uptown address work. I’ve started filling in some POIs and details but having good addresses to anchor on would be helpful.
dmich9 (2023-06-11 15:48:29+00:00): I apologize for missing those tags. I will add surfaces to all of the sidewalks and paths when I get home today
ianlopez1115 (2023-06-11 03:10:54+00:00): offset used was -0.60; 2.09
tyfi (2023-06-11 03:10:44+00:00): Only the westernmost half of Bear Creek Road carries MO HH
tyfi (2023-06-11 03:11:07+00:00): In satellite imagery, you can see the point where HH ends by the asphalt color
tyfi (2023-06-11 03:12:13+00:00): Also, again, let's not name the road "State Highway HH" when ref tags and route relations exist. This is a fragile, non-machine-readable practice.
Глеб (2023-09-19 07:48:18+00:00): Здравствуйте!
У нас не викимапия.
Не надо придумывать названия.
kucai (2023-06-12 05:01:50+00:00): Pekan Salak Selatan as landuse retail? Not entirely correct I would assume since Pekan is more in the town/suburb category.
Igor Bubelov (2024-08-16 05:28:30+00:00): Hello,

Does this place still exist and accept bitcoins?
TALK-KA-TREE (2025-01-03 08:23:44+00:00): I am the owner of this tree shop and I also accept bitcoin.
mani100 (2025-04-25 08:04:39+00:00): Hallo, der Weg vom Parkstüble aufwärts, ist Teil einer Wanderroute.  access=no versehentlich eingetragen?
user_5359 (2023-06-11 06:16:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys).
Gustave A Larson Company (2023-06-12 13:14:06+00:00): Hi, 

Could you please tell me why my node has been deleted?
What can I do to keep all of my info shown on your website?

Thank you!