piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2024-03-28 10:11:35+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
You mapped this as a cliff !
Why, This is just cultivated farmland at the same height as the surrounding area.
I remove it.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149193520
NeisBot (2024-04-09 07:04:03+00:00): Hello Ilya_Puchcow, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:24:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:26:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:26:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
citrula (2024-03-26 22:05:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM. You can select an object and press "Q" to square the corners in iD. Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149193874
mga_geo (2024-03-29 06:20:14+00:00): Bonjour,
id suggère parfois des valeurs qui sont inexactes, par exemple pour l'attribut "network" des relations "route=bus".
La bonne valeur pour le réseau STAR est "FR:STAR".
Je rétablis.
Marc
nimrodxx (2025-02-13 08:34:12+00:00): What did you think is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447222032 then?

From your wiki-link...
"A building passage is a tunnel that goes through a building, but is not inside the building itself (see pictured examples). The walls at both sides (and the top) of the tunnel are considered outer walls of the building, which can have entrances that lead into it. "

Thats exactly what it is, a (outdoor!) footpath from "Peiner Straße" to the parking at the rear of the building.
DressyPear4 (2024-03-28 03:24:47+00:00): Olá, 'pedestrian' seria apenas para 'calçadão'.
Para calçadas use path ou footway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149194078
bxl-forever (2024-03-26 20:41:52+00:00): Bonjour,

C’est quoi, toutes ces boulangeries artisanales qui apparaissent le même jour ?  Vous êtes en train d’importer une liste ?  Quelle est la source des données, svp ?  Ça vient d’un site ?

Aussi, prière de ne pas rajouter des adresses en double.  Le bâtiment a déjà une adresse, il ne faut pas l’écrire à nouveau sur la boulangerie, sinon ça fausse les recherches par adresse.
user_13442588 (2024-03-27 21:28:47+00:00): Salut ! 
Je fais partie d'un réseau de boulangeries artisanales : le RAB (Réseau d'Actions Boulangères) et on a créé une cartographie qui reprend tous ces lieux en Belgique. Cette carto utilise un fond de carte d'openstreetmap et donc pour faciliter la recherche des lieux repris sur la carto, j'ai enregistré ceux qui n'y étaient pas encore :) 
Si jamais, voici le lien de la cartographie :  https://purl.archive.org/rab/carte

Et merci pour la remarque ! Je découvre encore
bxl-forever (2024-03-27 22:20:27+00:00): Merci pour la réponse.  C’est surtout une vérification car dans le passé on a eu des problèmes avec des gens qui importaient plein de données de sites sous copyright, alors on doit toujours un peu surveiller.
Bonne continuation/découverte.
mavl (2024-03-27 07:05:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4168211
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-14 07:52:56+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149194387
deven_smith_ (2024-04-03 04:03:11+00:00): I was literally going to update this as I hiked this route today and the last time I looked the name was "Turkey Trot"
eggie (2024-03-26 21:40:49+00:00): Tip: Wat je ook kunt doen is van de 'pier' een vlak maken met een extra tag area=yes
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-03-27 10:06:26+00:00): area=yes toegevoegd
AngocA (2024-07-07 02:52:43+00:00): Este es el mapeo del río completo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1266609248/history#map=13/4.4935/-68.5360
luiswoo (2024-03-30 14:00:55+00:00): миль пардон, а зачем?
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-17 02:02:11+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149194751
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-18 02:08:47+00:00): Looks fantastic. Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149194770
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-17 02:00:24+00:00): Looks fantastic. Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149194788
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-26 20:50:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4365396751
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1266613307

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
t_ja (2024-03-27 16:40:58+00:00): Ahoj,
pokiaľ má budova už priradené súpisné číslo, automaticky to znamená, že bola skolaudovaná a teda nemôže byť building=construction. V tvojej sade zmien sa jedná len o dve budovy na Jabloniach, ale na celom SK je ich vyše 80: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1JcC
Ak sa ti chce to poopravovať, budem ti povďačný, a ak nie, tak ešte v Hriňovej som našiel nejakú budovu od teba ;)

Inak palec hore, skvelá práca, a nielen tu v Bytči.

T.
Filip009 (2024-03-27 16:52:27+00:00): Kľudne oprav. Ja napríklad pridávam rovno building=yes, pretože o ten rok, keď to niekto postaví, tak to nebude mať kto upraviť. Keď niečo také po mne nájdeš, kľudne opravuj. Pri tom množstve mi stále niečo újde (dve rovnaké ref:minvskaddress, adresa na zlej budove ...), ale 98% adries by mali byť okej.
Dodko (2024-03-28 09:02:58+00:00): Adresu je možné určiť aj rozostavanej budove, ale je to zanedbateľný počet.
V registri adries existuje stav budovy "Rozostavaná budova"
https://i2.paste.pics/QMXU1.png

Predo dňom právoplatnosti kolaudačného rozhodnutia na účel prevodu vlastníctva k budove alebo poistenia budovy obec môže na žiadosť určiť stavebníkovi súpisné číslo a orientačné číslo aj bez kolaudačného rozhodnutia. 
https://www.slov-lex.sk/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/1990/369/20231101#paragraf-2c.odsek-3
t_ja (2024-03-28 09:38:44+00:00): Tvrdenie, že "adresu je možné určiť aj rozostavanej budove" nie je pravdivé, pretože ku žiadosti o pridelenie súpisného čísla sa prikladá aj kolaudačné rozhodnutie. Vzhľadom na tebou uvedený zákon zjavne nemusí byť ešte právoplatné, ale podstatné je, že kolaudačný proces musel prebehnúť a stavebný úrad vydal kolaudačné rozhodnutie. Právoplatnosť nadobúda myslím do 14 dní (ak bolo vyvesené na úradnej tabuli, napr. lokalita bola posudzovaná v EIA), ale v určitých prípadoch ak sa stavebník vzdá práva na odvolanie, tak právoplatnosť nadobúda okamžite po vydaní.

Vzhľadom na to, že adresy do OSM nenahadzujeme okamžite po zverejnení v registri adries, tak sa môžme spoľahnúť na predpoklad, že keď má budova pridelenú adresu, nejedná sa o rozostavanú stavbu. To, že v katastri je budova ešte stále tak evidovaná je spôsobená nečinnosťou stavebníka, ktorý je povinný po pridelení súpisného čísla doniesť jedno potvrdenie na katastrálny úrad, ktorý má 60 dní na to, aby to zapísal (nejedná sa o Vklad, ale o Zápis).

Podľa časových možností zopár takýchto nezrovnalostí opravím, ale kľudne sa nechám predbehnúť :)

Čo sa týka tých duplicít ref:minvskaddress, už mi o tom písal aj @Klerik7 (v polovici februára), ale nepodarilo sa mi to vyriešiť v JOSM len s pomocou MapCSS validátora. A na písanie plugin-u, prípadne pretláčanie nového pravidla cez JOSM developerov nemám naozaj čas :(
Dodko (2024-03-28 09:56:44+00:00): Typ budovy "Rozostavaná budova" eviduje register adries pri adrese, nie len kataster. V katastri zvykne byť ešte dávno po pridelení adresy "rozostavaná budova".

...obec MÔŽE na žiadosť určiť stavebníkovi súpisné číslo a orientačné číslo aj BEZ kolaudačného rozhodnutia

nie je tam napísané právoplatného, proste je taká možnosť, register adries s tým počíta a to či to obec využije alebo nie, je na jej rozhodnutí
Dodko (2024-03-28 09:59:23+00:00): Vlastne máš pravdu v predošlej vete je Predo dňom právoplatnosti kolaudačného rozhodnutia
Filip009 (2024-03-28 10:26:05+00:00): Keď to chceš pridať do validátora, tak to pridaj k tomu môjmu, ktorý je na josm.openstreetmap.de. Potom si ho aspoň my, čo pridávame adresy stiahneme.
Stahlmann (2024-11-26 10:31:54+00:00): Das ein ganzes Stück Feldweg (/way/31981426) als Brücke getagged wurde ist vermutlich ein Flüchtigkeitsfehler gewesen?
Wo gehen wir hin (2024-11-26 19:05:56+00:00): Das stimmt. Die Brücke ist nur da, wo der Weg den Koppensbergbach kreuzt. Habe ich jetzt an der Stelle wieder eingetragen.
Stahlmann (2024-11-29 08:26:21+00:00): Ah klasse! Ich habe mir das bei der Warning beim Hochladen schon gedacht, aber war mir nicht sicher, ob eine Brücke oder ein Rohr liegt.
silversurfer83 (2024-03-27 06:58:10+00:00): Wieder die Frage: Woher hast du diese Informationen? Auch der neue Standort der Güllebehälter, die du einfach ins Feld geschoben hast. Kann ich auf keinem der in iD angebotenen Luftbilder nachvollziehen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149195690
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:24:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:23:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:25:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
Joseph R P (2024-03-29 05:48:18+00:00): Hello, the route between I 95 and I 695 shouldn't be tagged as trunk since there isn't really a relatively large amount of traffic that uses this route combination, other than what would be local traffic heading towards the Edgemere area (which isn't significant enough to warrant a trunk route). Primary seems best for here in this case.
pluton_od (2024-11-30 12:29:26+00:00): Привіт, Bliotz.
Чому ви видалили `name:ru` з декількох вулиць?
user_14547832 (2024-03-26 21:32:29+00:00): This is supposed to be "Structure Fixes"
user_14547832 (2024-03-26 21:32:25+00:00): This is supposed to be "Structure Fixes"
user_14547832 (2024-03-26 21:32:19+00:00): This is supposed to be "Structure Fixes"
user_14547832 (2024-03-26 21:32:09+00:00): This is supposed to be "Structure Fixes"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:23:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:22:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
tekim (2024-03-28 00:52:32+00:00): Hello, Thanks for editing the map.  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Earth when editing OSM due to Google's terms of use.
tekim (2024-03-28 00:53:24+00:00): This changeset is being reverted because it used a source that is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149247542
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:24:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
elsy1 (2024-03-27 07:11:51+00:00): نام منزل شخصی را با تگ قلعه ثبت کردید متوجه هستید این کار خرابکاری هست؟
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:25:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:26:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:22:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:25:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:23:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
eggie (2024-03-26 21:42:36+00:00): en vlak losgemaakt van wegdeel
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:24:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:22:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:24:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:23:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:24:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:26:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:25:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:24:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:26:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:26:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:26:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:23:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
mcliquid (2024-03-27 06:24:15+00:00): Und noch eine Änderung am Hochjoch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/201237184
Bauer33333 (2024-03-28 18:51:06+00:00): Wäre nett, wenn du Änderungen in separaten Regionen künftig auch separat hochlädst, das wird jetzt in halb Baden-Württemberg und der Schweiz als Änderung angezeigt, obwohl sich dort gar nichts geändert hat. 
Danke!
cxc (2024-03-28 15:24:21+00:00): una stazione di ricarica eliminata... non era corretta? chiedi all'utente... perchè eliminare?... sei sicuro che non esista una stazione di ricarica interna ad un campeggio?
Alienautic (2024-03-28 17:09:22+00:00): Ciao, scusami ma non ricordo di avere cancellato una stazione di ricarica. Probabilmente l'ho fatto innavertitamente! Mi scuso
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-26 22:10:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111751612
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111751617

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-10 17:07:29+00:00): poprawione
Frans S (2024-03-27 17:48:02+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Access to houses close to a highway (within sight ) are not necessary to be mapped,
Read also the highway wiki east africa  highway when you tag a road as service.
You tagged a standard road between houses as 'service'  Residential should be better here.
Best regards
Tomas Straupis (2024-03-27 07:04:45+00:00): Laba diena. Negerai taip, nes pagal KVR (su tokiu KVR kodu - 28186 - galima tikrinti https://kvr.kpd.lt) objektas yra akmuo. Jei ten yra IR akmuo, IR šaltinis, tai reikėtų tada du atskirus objektus žymėti.
Tomas Straupis (2024-03-27 07:05:12+00:00): Matau pagal KVR ten yra DU objetai.
ElliottPlack (2024-03-27 01:02:59+00:00): Hi there. I'd just recently surveyed the new roadway alignments at the eastern side of the Key Bridge. I'm not sure who did it, but a lot of the roads have been mapped to outdated imagery. Bing is best here. Would you please take a look at the area just west of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1263119636 and make sure it lines up to Bing? 

Thanks,

Elliott
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-27 02:48:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149202119
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-27 02:52:42+00:00): Done. I also set up an alert for any changes made to the node at the intersection.
Xvtn (2024-03-27 20:05:18+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great overall! I see that you removed a bridge area feature (north end of Venture Parkway) - Was that intentional?

Thanks for your contributions!
TheMattWalsh (2024-03-27 21:54:45+00:00): Hello! Yes that was unintentional. I believe I added it back in another change. When do these updates usually get reflected on the open street maps? This is on my drive to work so I see it everyday 😅
Xvtn (2024-04-04 14:18:41+00:00): Nice! And regarding updates, it can really depend. If you clear your browser cache (ctrl+f5) you can usually see changes rendered on osm.org within a minute or two. For other data consumers, it can vary wildly, anywhere from a few mins (certain phone apps) to a few months or longer. (a vehicle's navigation unit) How are you looking at the map on your drive to work?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-13 12:29:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356914534 is it torn down? not existing anymore?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-04-01 13:26:52+00:00): por que voce excluiu a ciclovia que o usuário experiente Wille criou?
Reno Viana (2024-04-01 16:27:47+00:00): Eu exclui esse pedaço porque não existe de fato essa parte da ciclovia, so existe na parte de cima da via.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:24:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
NieWnen (2024-03-27 20:10:32+00:00): Cześć, 

dzięki za zmiany i dodawanie nowej infrastruktury rowerowej.

Czy ta nowa ścieżka, to jest wyłącznie droga dla rowerów, czy może jest to ciąg pieszo-rowerowy?  Wtedy tagowanie jest nieco inne: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w

2 uwagi:
- postaraj się proszę nie duplikować istniejącej ścieżki – to się dzieje przy rondzie
- precyzja gpx jest niestety często bardzo słaba i używałbym w ostateczności jeśli realnie czegoś nie widać – tutaj na pewno ścieżka nie biegnie ulicą (okolice ronda), a staramy się jak trzymać jak najlepszą geometrię. Jako, że ścieżka pewnie już jest oddana do użytku, to widać ją na warstwie BDOT (Obiektów topograficznych) – ta jest super dokładna i pokrywa się niemal zawsze z ortofotomapą, która wychodzi później.

W razie jakichkolwiek wątpliwości pytaj śmiało, czy tu, czy na pw, czy na forum/Discordzie OSM.
Klisu (2024-09-06 16:04:29+00:00): jest to ciąg pieszo-rowerowy
Xvtn (2024-03-27 20:02:31+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Everything seems great to me, thanks for your contributions!
josmougn (2026-03-25 00:15:43+00:00): bonjour,
Pourquoi avoir changé le nom "Ancien chemin de fer de Quimper à Pont-l'Abbé" en "Voie verte de Quimper à Pluguffan" ?
A ma connaissance il n'y a pas eu de nom attribué officiellement à cette nouvelle voie verte.
La transformation de la voie ferrée en sentier de randonnée ne change en rien le caractère "ferré" de l'infrastructure, ni dans la géographie et le paysage, ni dans les mémoires, et ne justifie pas de changer le nom.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304327724
Trugarez.
ChRogel (2026-03-26 17:30:48+00:00): J’ai changé le nom de ce tronçon en me référant à l’autorité légitime, le CD qui l’a aménagé (et financé aux 2/3). C’est le nom qu’il donne sur son site. Cependant, cette partie va être jointe au tronçon aménagé depuis très longtemps.
Sur le site «  Tout commence en Finistère » (émanation du Département), il y a l’indice de l’appellation probable : « Voie verte Quimper-Pluguffan-Pont-l’Abbé ». Quoiqu’il en soit, c’est le Département qui est la source légitime.
Une voie verte n’est pas un sentier de randonnée. Ici, elle est ouverte aux vélos et aux chevaux.