piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-17 13:40:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155020653

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
emersonveenstra (2023-03-18 10:59:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155020866 is broken because it either crosses over itself or has an unclosed part, please fix this
user_177389 (2023-03-18 09:11:23+00:00): Hello Dreamer1983,

please do not use tags for administrative boundaries at campsites. It's better to "invent" new tags - maybe they will be used more widely later and then be more suitable for search.

I have changed these areas to boundary=place and place=camping because they are not administrative units directly from Vendays-Montalivet but management units of the campsite. The address tags are on the buildings here.

Best regards,
Mario
emersonveenstra (2023-03-18 10:58:47+00:00): Hi,

Two of these buildings are broken because they cross over themselves or have unclosed parts. Please fix these, thanks!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155023063
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155023085
emersonveenstra (2023-03-24 10:58:04+00:00): Fixed, user not responding
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-25 15:46:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134108394 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism and creating fake objects with nonsense names at random places.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-25 15:46:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134108394 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism and creating fake objects with nonsense names at random places.
Lancelotance (2023-03-17 16:02:10+00:00): 典范城市！
monhiko (2023-03-17 18:38:12+00:00): 不敢不敢，就一个小城市而已（捂脸）
emersonveenstra (2023-03-18 11:00:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155025810
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155025797
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155025805

These are broken because they either cross over themselves or have an unclosed part. please fix this.
emersonveenstra (2023-03-24 10:58:16+00:00): Fixed, user not responding
eggie (2023-03-19 21:08:30+00:00): Dag Dillen..  Dat from to kun je hier beter niet gebruiken. Dat is ongebruikelijk. 

De routerelatie 50-89 is hier stuk? 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-03-19 21:49:04+00:00): Fietsroute hersteld
eggie (2023-03-19 22:14:34+00:00): Fietsroute om afrastering heengeleid.

Groet
eggie
Piskvor (2023-03-17 16:38:55+00:00): Ahoj, bylo potřeba revertovat tu část trati od Výstaviště z railway=disused na railway=abandoned? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133779215#map=15/50.1008/14.4186

Podle wiki "abandoned" znamená "trať snesena, zůstávají jen terénní úpravy", což se, pokud vím, týká jen části od Buben po Výstaviště (a nejméně dva roky ta jednokolejka od Výstaviště po Dejvice zůstane nedotčena, tj. skoro normální trať, jen bez provozu). https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:railway

Jistě, bude se to - pokud půjde vše podle plánu - za pár let vytrhávat taky a nahrazovat dvojkolejnou tratí, ale do té doby se 1.může stát leccos, a 2.rád bych v mapě viděl stav, který odpovídá stavu v terénu.
Piskvor (2023-03-17 16:41:50+00:00): Jo aha, už to vidím, jsem myslel, žes to přetagoval všechno zpátky, a tys to ve skutečnosti zpřesnil. Omlouvám se za renonc.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-25 15:46:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134108394 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism and creating fake objects with nonsense names at random places.
Noen (2023-03-20 11:23:17+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM!
If you set access to private, then that applies to all modes of transportation. 
No need to set motor_vehicle=private, horse=private, foot=private, bicycle	=private or any other transportation mode listed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Land-based_transportation
ChillyDL (2023-03-17 19:59:23+00:00): Hello zolt d,
I see you deleted archaeological_site= and turned name:en to name:es for the English name for Cueva de los tayos as well as Cuevas de Tayunts.
Both is surprising - can you let me know why?
zsolt d (2023-03-17 22:05:56+00:00): Hello ChilyDL!
 I messed something up badly. I tried to fix it. Please check if it's good now! Information from:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cueva_de_los_Tayos
Zsolt
söm4324 (2026-03-01 21:08:44+00:00): Hallo defire, kannst du zu diesem Hinweis was sagen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5147132 ?
Ist der Hydrant nur aus Versehen auf's Feld gerutscht?
Ekeefoof (2023-03-23 14:34:16+00:00): Hallo,
bitte versehe deine Änderungen mit sinnvollen Kommentaren, und achte auf Korrektheit. An der Korber Straße waren Fußwege redundant sowie nicht verbunden.
Vielen Dank
TheNet1996 (2023-03-26 01:31:19+00:00): Hallo,
der Eintrag wurde korrigiert.
Eine Arztpraxis ist kein Krankenhaus.
Viele Grüße
Mike
mueschel (2023-03-18 09:48:53+00:00): welcome to OSM!
You used some tags like "Terrain de jeux " in your edits.
This might be a good description of the object, but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand it. Only tags that are described in the wiki or are available in the presets in the editor should be used.

Would you mind checking these tags and change them to documented ones? Let us (e.g. on the forums) know if you need help!
ivanbranco (2023-04-04 11:06:08+00:00): Ciao ross-map,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10741734973
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10741711668/

il ref:msal è un codice univoco, quindi non può appartenere a due farmacie. Riesci a verificare?

Grazie e buon mapping :)
Rogoyski (2023-03-24 18:40:50+00:00): Miejskie Zakłady Autobusowe z całą pewnością nie są operatorem/zarządcą przystanków autobusowych w Warszawie.

Podobnie, nie można przypisać MZA jako operatora do poszczególnych linii autobusowych.

Proszę o wycofanie tych zmian.
Tetryk (2023-03-25 08:38:50+00:00): OK
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-04-22 14:01:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135228709, 135225625 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to fictional edits.
JeroenvanderGun (2023-12-14 11:25:19+00:00): Ik zie dat je in deze changeset de positionering van wegen in de aansluiting A2/N230 had verschoven. Gelieve hierbij rekening te houden met de aanwezigheid van placement-tags. Bij het gebruik van placement-tagging ligt de way niet noodzakelijkerwijs in het midden van de rijbaan, maar kan deze bijvoorbeeld in het midden van de stroken voor rechtdoor worden geplaatst.

Zie de wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement
user_5359 (2023-03-17 16:05:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsocial_facility for a better description.
gscholz (2023-04-20 08:25:45+00:00): Hi infordemanda,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-3.17593&lat=41.82043&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.66&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133792875

As you may know, this type if error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about how to edit hiking routes properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking

Kind regards
Guido
danieldegroot2 (2023-03-17 15:48:04+00:00): Hey Spaghetti Monster,

Please use sources appropriate for the area you are mapping and specify them actively when saving your edits.

For The Netherlands, use Esri and PDOK 8cm aerial. These should be readily available in JOSM. You can find other data sources, like the AHN (LIDAR height model), on the forums:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/de-beste-imagery-layers-om-nl-osm-te-mappen-met-josm/85393

If you need any help, comment on said thread, or start a new one.

Any inappropriate changes, being low accuracy or made using outdated sources, may be reverted by other mappers. If you continue to map inappropriately, the Data Working Group may have to step in. You are likely already aware of this.

Regards,

Daniel
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-17 23:45:30+00:00): Can you specify what I did wrong instead of just lecturing me about sources.
danieldegroot2 (2023-03-18 22:00:40+00:00): You are using an outdated aerial imagery layer for this area. You should use the recommended aerial imagery layers which I mentioned above.

I haven't used JOSM in a long time. If you need any help with using these layers in JOSM, try asking on the forums.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-19 00:30:47+00:00): You should go threaten all 13,000 of these changesets with DWG action. https://osmcha.org/?filters=%7B%22geometry%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%7B%22coordinates%22%3A%5B%5B%5B3.267328%2C51.458295%5D%2C%5B6.146708%2C51.426247%5D%2C%5B7.046515%2C53.462905%5D%2C%5B4.552765%2C53.462905%5D%2C%5B3.267328%2C51.458295%5D%5D%5D%2C%22type%22%3A%22Polygon%22%7D%2C%22value%22%3A%7B%22coordinates%22%3A%5B%5B%5B3.267328%2C51.458295%5D%2C%5B6.146708%2C51.426247%5D%2C%5B7.046515%2C53.462905%5D%2C%5B4.552765%2C53.462905%5D%2C%5B3.267328%2C51.458295%5D%5D%5D%2C%22type%22%3A%22Polygon%22%7D%7D%5D%2C%22editor%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22JOSM%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22JOSM%22%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%2C%22source%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22Bing%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22Bing%22%7D%5D%7D
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-19 00:31:22+00:00): Don't actually do that.
danieldegroot2 (2023-03-19 12:24:48+00:00): This is a friendly notice for your own information. What you do with it is up to you. I do not intend to threaten any user with DWG action. However, if you make any inappropriate changes, it may result in such action.
Whether other people do this or not does not matter for this.

Please use proper sources in future edits. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Do_not_trace_from_outdated_imagery
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-19 15:45:54+00:00): So you threatened me by accident? 
But you should be worried about them doing it though right? It seems important to you.
danieldegroot2 (2023-03-19 21:18:59+00:00): I understand your reaction. I'm sorry if it comes across as one.
I'm not too worried about it. It's unlikely they want to do map much harm. With new mappers it can be discussed eventually if needed. They are likely to get a welcome message from us and learn about this regardless. Corporate mappers should adjust to the organized editing guidelines, and it can take a bit before they cooperate. For more experienced mappers -not to be all personal about it-, it'd be good courtesy towards fellow mappers. It makes it easier to verify other mappers' changes and discuss their edits.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability

I'm aware the changes you are doing are not changing much, they're more reverting incorrect changes. Still, it'd only be reasonable to use the local sources which the local community has agreed upon for best practice.

I hope this helps to clarify things.
Frans S (2023-03-18 11:23:35+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.

You are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

In iDeditor, zoom in so far the hidden objects are visible. ( blue note on bottom line warns about hidden objects)
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Tag buildings as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines and squared(rectangular only).


Don't connect nodes to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.

See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133793011
silversurfer83 (2023-03-19 20:09:49+00:00): Hi :)
Wenn da ein 260er steht, dann reicht ein einfaches motor_vehicle=no und die restlichen Angaben (foot, bicycle,...) bleiben weg, weil die implizit als yes angesehen werden. bicycle=yes setzen wir eigentlich, wenn da explizit ein Schild die Nutzung durch Fahrräder erlaubt.
Hilfreiches Werkzeug: https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133793082
rskedgell (2023-03-17 18:10:12+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for adding details to the map.

If you're adding individual plots with allotments, it might be better to tag the plot as allotment=plot and use the ref key to store the plot number.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:allotments%3Dplot

If there's any way in which I can help you, please feel free to ask.

-- Rob
mavl (2023-03-20 14:14:11+00:00): Здравствуйте, ОлегR52. Напишите, пожалуйста, у вас есть разрешение от Яндекса на использование его спутниковых снимков в OpenStreetMap?  
    
Владимир Маршинин  
Рабочая группа по данным
mavl (2023-03-24 10:30:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 134051515, 134045911, 134058112 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6981].
euroPathfinder (2023-03-18 08:24:42+00:00): Hi tsharris,
You requested a review of your changeset. Your change looks good to me, thanks for your contribution! Happy mapping and enjoy your weekend :)

euroPathfinder
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133793883
Jillis inactivE (2023-04-23 18:05:25+00:00): Hoi, de openingstijden van de weekmarkt horen niet in de naam volgens mij.
tttnnn24 (2023-04-23 18:19:30+00:00): Ik denk dat je nog gelijk hebt ook. Ik weet niet meer van welke markt ik dat overnam of dat ik de bedenker zelf was. Tilburgse markt bezoekers zijn vermoedelijk ook geen OSM doelgroep. Of toch?
Jillis inactivE (2023-04-23 18:45:49+00:00): Iedereen is de OSM doelgroep ;-)
tttnnn24 (2023-04-23 18:53:53+00:00): LOL :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-09 08:43:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10741842408

Would https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=childcare describe it well?
yasslay (2023-03-17 21:41:41+00:00): Hello,

Can you explain why you added objects such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155052369 in the middle of nowhere? Also, smaller changesets please: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Kind regards,
yasslay
Hope Craft (2023-03-20 14:26:47+00:00): Hi Yasslay,

I outlined the object because it looked as if it was some sort of concrete pad, but feel free to delete/disregard if I was incorrect.

Hope
yasslay (2023-03-20 14:56:41+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for the response. I understand, however it does not appear to be an industrial area, which is what you tagged it as. I've deleted the object in question, also keep in mind to upload your changesets within a small area. While this varies with the changeset preferences of different people, just keep this in mind in the future. Also, it is important that you do not do guesswork/armchair map on a large scale (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Armchair_mapping), as it can lead to QA problems such as the one seen with the object which I've deleted.

Nonetheless, welcome to OSM, and happy mapping!

Kind regards,
yasslay
Dawid2849 (2023-09-10 21:26:26+00:00): Cześć! 
Z tego co widzę to usunąłeś odcinek S12 w okolicy wsi Dorohucza (który nie będzie w najbliższym czasie budowany), ale ktoś go przywrócił: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155052918/
nie wiem co mam o tym myśleć, nie wtrącam się w to, po prostu chciałem Cię o tym poinformować

Pozdrawiam, 
Dawid
AndyB_66 (2023-09-11 05:45:57+00:00): Ten odcinek będzie miał ponowną DŚU, ze względu na ujawnione, a nie uwzględnione w projekcie składowisko odpadów metalurgicznych. Wycofałem zmiany usera Milaviy4.
Grzegorz_Kujawa (2023-05-06 20:10:10+00:00): Cześć,
coś Ci się tu węzły zdublowały. Zerknij na to, proszę:
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/pl/map/#zoom=16&lat=52.16808&lon=20.10675&item=1230&level=1%2C2%2C3
Florek89 (2023-05-07 06:21:03+00:00): Jak tylko wrócę z uczelni to zerknę (mam nadzieję tylko, że nie zapomnę o tym)
Florek89 (2023-05-07 09:01:12+00:00): Dobra problem zlokalizowałem (rozdzieliłem grunty orne, aby zrobić dokładny landuse, ale przeniosłem się z robotą w inny rejon widocznie). Nie mam teraz możliwości, aby to przerobić.
W ciągu tygodnia zostanie poprawione.
_uid0 (2023-03-17 16:51:32+00:00): Ces modifications ne font aucun sens. Veuillez les annuler s’il vous plaît!
maro21 (2023-03-22 20:35:37+00:00): Where do these names come from? For example https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2613078 is neither on Wikipedia https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/pl:Borne%20Sulinowo%20(gmina) nor on http://gov.genealogy.net/search/name

Are these nowadays used German names or old German names? If these are names for municipalities used before 1945, they should be in [old_name:de].
I suppose they should be in [old_name:de] because only a few towns in Opolskie voivodships have German names.

If you add a name in another language, you should copy the value of the [name] tag to [name:pl].
PJ120 (2023-03-23 18:41:02+00:00): About where the names are from:
There are no official German names for gminas in Poland, however their Polish names just consist of the word "gmina" followed by the name of their administrative city. What i did is combine these city names that are already present on the city's respective node ("admin_centre" of the gmina relation) together with "Gemeinde" (German word for "Gmina").
In addition to that, i checked most of the names with http://gov.genealogy.net that visualizes various historical sources regarding city names. In case of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2613078 i used the "name:de" tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/31580922, which is "Groß Born". It also matches with this entry on genealogy.net: http://gov.genealogy.net/item/show/BOROR2JO83GN
("Bahnhof" is just the German word for railway station, followed up by the city name "Groß Born")

This name is also present on the German Wikipedia page of Borne Sulinowo, which is probably the reason it was added to OSM.

The issue of the usage of "name:de" and "old_name:de" has been discussed multiple times by the German community with most people agreeing to keep using "name:de" for names that were not part of a political renaming campaign (like changed names introduced during WW2). These should instead be tagged with old_name:de:-1945 or similar. I also checked most of the names for that, but i did not find any.

Here are some examples of representative opinions on the topic:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-March/069416.html
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-March/069422.html

Thanks for letting me know about adding the native name in addition to any multilingual name, i will do that in case of any further editing like this.
PJ120 (2023-09-20 11:03:15+00:00): See discussion at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131974192, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140914509
emersonveenstra (2023-03-17 17:27:44+00:00): Hi,

Granger was already mapped as a node here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/153539114, can you please merge the node and the way together? Thanks!
leveskockaa (2023-03-21 07:29:54+00:00): Szia!
Honnan származnak ezek a színek?
ironalloy (2023-03-21 08:20:40+00:00): A BKK-s logókról másoltam
leveskockaa (2023-03-21 09:31:46+00:00): Egy menetrend PDF-ből, vagy honnan? A BKK által publikált GTFS adatbázisban nem ezek szerepelnek, hanem az előzőek.
rskedgell (2023-03-18 00:12:25+00:00): Have the shared cycle path sign and give way markings visible on Bing Streetside at the Southfield Road end of w165229870 been removed or replaced with a cycling prohibited sign?
mbirth (2023-03-23 23:59:58+00:00): No, it's still a shared cycle path, sign is still there. There's just no second barrier. But this area needs more work. The construction site is now a Community Centre. Once I've settled in here, I'll update it.
rskedgell (2023-03-24 07:51:57+00:00): That's great, thank you!
mavl (2023-03-24 10:30:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 134051515, 134045911, 134058112 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6981].
JJIglesias (2023-03-17 16:57:52+00:00): Saludos Erick. Por favor revisa la Wiki con respecto a healthcare=centre. Esa Tag esta siendo desusada por ser muy ambigua. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:healthcare%3Dcentre
Gracias por agregar los Centros de Salud de SCZ
Gracias
JJ
YoViajo (2023-03-17 18:23:49+00:00): De acuerdo, lo ajusto.
JJIglesias (2023-03-18 04:34:35+00:00): Creo que tampoco poner healthcare=yes  es la solucion. Como esos centros de salud NO tienen internacion,  pero si medicos y enfermeras, creo que deberian ponerse como healthcare=clinic, aunque en lo personal yo los pondria como healthcare=hospital.

Este criterio debe aplicarse a todos los centros que has puesto, no solo al C.S.Bermudez.

Gracias
JJ
ma-rt-in (2023-03-21 18:47:34+00:00): Hallo,

bitte achte darauf, das wir im englischen taggen, also Komma-Werte mit Punkt setzten. Das müsstest du noch nach holen.

vg
MxxCon (2023-03-19 23:44:06+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate what kind of conflict access restrictions where here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133796684
sam-mapbox (2023-03-29 20:56:52+00:00): Redundant use of access=no, when there are other access restrictions.

I removed access=no and left the restricted modes of travel.
eggie (2023-03-19 20:57:35+00:00): Dag Dillen....  'k Denk beter note=  gebruiken ipv description.
note=  is een aanwijzing voor medemappers.
MVG
eggie
ALu68 (2023-03-17 20:19:40+00:00): name=Tümpel  ?????????
November2019 (2023-03-18 08:46:44+00:00): Hallo ALu68,
wir haben in Stregda in diesem Bereich einen für Lurche und Kröten usw. wichtigen Tümpel, der noch im 19. Jahrhundert als Alter See auch eine beträchtliche Größe hatte, aber die Bauern wollten mehr Ackerland und auch das Verlanden mit Schwemmsand hat sicher dazu beigetragen. Jedenfalls ist es jetzt ein Tümpel und kein See mehr, hab mir den Ort am 17.03. angeschaut und auch gleich alle Hydranten mit meiner neuen Kamera (mit GPS-Funktion) präsise erfasst.
ALu68 (2023-03-18 11:59:52+00:00): Es geht um den Trivialnamen "Tümpel".

Ich habe dir schon mehrfach die Seiten im Wiki genannt "der Name ist nur der Name"  

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht,_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben%E2%86%99
November2019 (2023-03-18 13:51:42+00:00): Hallo ALu68,
vielen Dank für Deine erneuten Hinweise. Ich habe dazu aber auch einen Grund. Die Angaben, die ich hier eintrage habe ich in der Regel vor Ort oder in entspr. Veröffentlichungen  recherchiert. Bei diesem TÜMPEL handelt es sich um ein Landschaftselement, das in der Schautafel vom Erfurter Ingenieurbüro PLANART zum Abschluss der Straßensanierung der Landesstraße   etwa 500 m oberhalb am Radweg nach Neukirchen auf einer 2 m² Infotafel mit KARTE eingetragen wurde. Das werden auch die seltenen Kröten und diverses erläutert, also ist der Tümpel auch ein "Amtlicher Tümpel". ergo ist Tümpel der Eigenname - aber wenn Du meinst, das er überflüssig ist, dann entferne ihn. - Beste Grüße aus Thüringen  ...