piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Udarian (2023-05-26 20:39:34+00:00): as a note the bus stop at MDC Kendall Campus is closed due to construction, I can testify to that because I walk passed it every other day for the last week.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136598875
spughetti (2023-05-26 17:46:33+00:00): Source:
https://data.sfgov.org/Culture-and-Recreation/StreetSmArts-Murals/wg8w-68vc
aceman444 (2023-05-29 16:33:05+00:00): Hi, what is the source of the data? You have to provide that in the changeset tags, or better on evry object you add, change. You cannot see memorials on the aerial imagery you claim to use.

Also learn to add proper changeset descriptions: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments .
Thanks
Matthew Hostak (2023-05-29 16:36:48+00:00): Hi, which memorial are we talking about? All of them should exist as I have physically visited it all and took photos.

And yeah, sorry about the descriptions, I was uploading bulk changes that I have stored locally.

Thanks
aceman444 (2023-05-29 20:25:46+00:00): There is only one added memorial in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1176332523

If you have visited the objects, put source=survey on them.
Matthew Hostak (2023-05-29 20:42:38+00:00): Hi, the memorial is visible eg @ https://www.google.sk/maps/@48.084495,17.6928775,3a,28.2y,263.14h,89.3t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sgHkKPFbUfQrbJdZMVDdirA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu

And yeah, I try and add source=survey everywhere but sometimes the editor skips to the next field and I miss that. 

But it should not happen anymore as I won't be uploading that much stuff as all these changes were from past few months in bulk
habi (2024-10-21 09:49:14+00:00): Der Defi ist mitten auf der Strasse, laut Beschreibung aber beim "Clubhaus Gaderobe SV Sissach"
chnuessli (2024-10-21 14:40:50+00:00): Angepasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158173620
habi (2024-10-21 17:48:01+00:00): Mersi
eggie (2023-05-26 18:36:51+00:00): Dag Henri  Hier is onbedoeld ook een bomenrij verschoven zo te zien..
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=136599906

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-26 18:37:46+00:00): De bomenrij heb ik teruggelegd
Ropino (2023-06-15 18:37:13+00:00): Hi, 
highway=CD/RW/8044 ?
"CD/RW/8044" -> could be a kind of ref ?
Please check it. Thx in advance.
ramthelinefeed (2023-06-15 21:02:52+00:00): yes, the tag should be 'highway_authority_ref=CD/RW/8044'

Looks like the auto-complete went wrong in the editor. 

Can you see which way is the mistagged one? I couldn't find it when I looked there...
Ropino (2023-06-16 04:54:13+00:00): Hi, it's in the relation:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15907231
ramthelinefeed (2023-06-16 08:18:35+00:00): got it! :)
VictorIE (2024-08-03 20:32:17+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19753505/history

This seems to be a local road - it has a local road number. However, it is now marked as highway=secondary, which is reserved for regional roads.
craghead (2024-09-07 23:53:27+00:00): Hi,
The change I made was to add the tag: surface=asphalt (I think). The extension of this road to Blessington has the same tags? Any suggestion as to what designation this road should have?
eggie (2023-05-26 19:05:29+00:00): Dag Henr  Wanneer wegen elkaar kruisen breng dan altijd een verbinding aan middels een node.
Ook paden die niet aan andere paden vastzitten zullen niet routeren.
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 	1
warnings:disconnected_way:highway 	3

Ik heb de wegen doorverbonden en een nodeverbinding gemaakt.
MVG
eggie
Glassman (2023-05-27 05:20:06+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q". 

Also - please review the house and batting cage you added. The house outline should match the roof outline.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136600771
BCNorwich (2023-05-28 07:04:19+00:00): Removed ways incorrectly tagged as highways and or areas.
RedAuburn (2023-06-12 21:22:51+00:00): is there really a cave entrance here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10929735001
RedAuburn (2023-06-12 21:23:57+00:00): in fact, this changeset added multiple cave entrances on roads 🤔
RedAuburn (2023-06-12 21:28:31+00:00): removed in https://www.osm.org/changeset/137261084, please revert it if these actually do exist
czubi (2024-05-20 13:18:53+00:00): Hallo Oskar, was wolltest du mit office=Horizonte eintragen? Sowas gibts nicht.
czubi (2024-05-20 13:27:56+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:office%3Darchitect
Das?
Plus dann noch name=Horizonte
silversurfer83 (2023-05-27 06:13:05+00:00): Gude

vor gut zwei Wochen schrieb ich dir schon einmal einen Kommentar in eine deiner Änderungen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136023500) und fragte nach den Namen. Ich bekam bis jetzt keine Reaktion.
In diesem Artikel des Wiki ist klar erklärt, wie mit Namen bei OpenstreetMap umgegangen wird:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen

Bitte erkläre nachvollziehbar, warum du glaubst, dass die von dir in den letzten Wochen vergebenen Namen doch in die Datenbank gehören oder entferne diese wieder. Danke.

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136601252
silversurfer83 (2023-05-30 08:41:01+00:00): Da keine Rückmeldung erfolgte habe ich die Namen erstmal entfernt. Sollte es keine gute Erklärung geben, bitte ich darum die Namen auch nicht wieder einzutragen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136732332
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136601252
sheldonelectric (2025-03-03 19:14:05+00:00): Hola, donde encontraste escritos estos nombres en espanol?? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23215201
Juan MAS (2025-03-06 16:07:21+00:00): En las páginas de Wikipedia, Arcdaily, ArquitecturaViva, unos son traducciones libres.
sheldonelectric (2025-03-06 20:29:19+00:00): Encontre muchos problemas con traducciones libres y por eso las boro. Por favor no inventar nada, solo copiar el wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability#Improving_verifiability_by_documenting_values
Juan MAS (2025-03-06 21:34:44+00:00): Hecho.
opendcc (2023-05-27 15:37:34+00:00): Sportzentrum? Wirklich?
rskedgell (2023-05-27 18:34:57+00:00): Please don't add features which already exist on the map.
eggie (2023-05-26 19:08:53+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. Water en bos bijten elkaar. (zwemmende bomen) Je zult het dus moeten scheiden. Dat heb ik nu even voor je gedaan. 
Wat is Airsoft Combat Support?
Dat zal niet doen in OSM. Ook de aard van de instelling toevoegen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-26 19:11:23+00:00): Het hek heb ik verbonden met de weg. Het zal anders niets tegen houden
access=no klopt niet met motor_vehicle=designated. 
Dit geeft verwarring. 
Is het wellicht motor_vehicle=destination?
eggie (2023-05-26 19:15:23+00:00): aangepast naar =destination. Laat maar weten wat de bedoeling is..
MVG
eggie
Henri_098 (2023-05-26 19:31:31+00:00): Hallo Eggie!

Bedankt voor je snelle reactie! 

Airsoft Combat Support is een bedrijf en op dit terrein word airsoft gespeeld. 

motor_vehicle=designated was bedoeld als, alleen met toestemming bedoeld.


Henri_098
eggie (2023-05-26 19:57:46+00:00): Oke.. dan is destination oke..
Designated is juist bestemd voor... 
Veel plezier met mappen..

Eggie
osmviborg (2023-05-27 06:09:23+00:00): 'Læsten Bakker' er stadig et fredet område. At Den Danske Naturfond, sammen med kommunen, laver et større naturområde omkring'Læsten Bakker' ændrer det fredede område.
osmviborg (2023-05-27 06:28:07+00:00): ændrer IKKE det fredede område. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9992110
Lostmonkey (2023-05-27 07:23:06+00:00): Du har ret, tak.
Lostmonkey (2023-05-27 16:33:50+00:00): Mon ikke det egetlig er mere retvisende at bruge boundary=protected_area end naturreservat? En fredning er trods alt ikke automatisk et reservat på linje med dem vi ellers har i DK.
0000FF berries (2023-05-26 22:07:37+00:00): Hallo :)

Danke für die Aktualisierung von OpenStreetMap :) Ich bin einer der Freiwilligen hier in Griechenland und habe eine andere deiner Änderungen gesehen, die mit "review requested" markiert war :) Bezüglich https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1176346643 hast du den "level" Tag hinzugefügt. Vielleicht wollten Sie "layer" verwenden ...? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer Ich hoffe, Sie hatten eine schöne Zeit in Monemvasia :) Wenn Sie Fragen haben, lassen Sie es mich wissen oder fragen Sie auf https://community.openstreetmap.org/ (für eine schnellere Antwort - es gibt Abschnitte für Griechenland und Deutschland) :)

Nochmals vielen Dank für die Updates und viel Spaß beim Mappen :)

Automatische Übersetzung - Nachricht auf Englisch folgt

-----

Hello :)

Thanks for updating OpenStreetMap :) I'm one of the volunteers here in Greece and I saw another of your changesets, which was marked with "review requested" :) Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1176346643 you have added the "level" tag. Perhaps you wanted to use "layer" ..? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer 

I hope you had a nice time at Monemvasia :) If you have questions,  let me know  or you can ask at https://community.openstreetmap.org/  (for a faster reply - there are sections for Greece and Germany) :)

Thanks again for the updates and happy mapping :)
eggie (2023-05-26 19:36:35+00:00): Beste Henri... Niet alles gaat goed.
Je hebt je hut verbonden met de hoogspanningleiding van Tennet met 22000 V
Ik zal ze weer ontkoppelen van die stroomdraad.
MVG
eggie


https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=136602112
eggie (2023-05-26 20:06:27+00:00): Feedback...  Hier zit het hek wel goed. De node verbonden met de weg. 
Er staan geen accesstags op. Dus het routeert gewoon. Is dat de bedoeling? 
Op het andere hek naar de parkeerplaats staan ook geen accesstags. ,, net als op  de amenity=parking..
Wellicht private?
Het beste kun je bijtaggen op de adresnode. Dan is themapark gekoppeld aan het adres De Haar 1 Assen. 
In het begin lijkt alles rijstebrij in OSM, maar dat gaat vanzelf over.
Voor die activiteieten zijn ook wel speciale tags... net als paintball.
Eens google in de wiki. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-26 20:07:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dpaintball
eggie (2023-05-26 20:09:28+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dlaser_tag
Henri_098 (2023-05-26 20:10:45+00:00): Ja klopt het meeste klinkt heel logisch, alleen moet wel even alles opnieuw uitvinden. Super bedankt! Zit jij toevallig ook in Element?

Henri
eggie (2023-05-26 20:22:43+00:00): Nop.....  
Weet er niets van.
Ik screen de eerste edits van nieuwe mappers en stuur de welkomstberichten.
Je hebt er ooit een van mij gehad vijf jaar terug.
Ik zal het nog een keer sturen, want er is weer veel veranderd in OSM land.
Mapse,
eggie
Glassman (2023-05-27 05:20:47+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136602496
Eman_Mehrez (2023-05-29 06:36:44+00:00): Hello Abdullah Al Werfalli;
I noticed you added "oneway=reversible" and this tag will make Routing engines should not route over this type of oneway without knowing about oneway scheduled times.
and if you see KartaView Tracks this street is bi directions and there is no sign to add time for this street.
Link kartaview:
https://kartaview.org/map/@31.76396,14.0359,18z
Link for the street:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/668580084
I fixed this issue.
Regards
Eman_Mehrez
Glassman (2023-05-27 05:21:23+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136602709
Glassman (2023-05-27 05:21:36+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136602755
Glassman (2023-05-27 05:21:48+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136602905
Glassman (2023-05-27 05:22:00+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136602975
emersonveenstra (2023-05-26 22:29:15+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your contributions, however this is not a tertiary road, this is a unclassified road. Tertiary roads must connect on both ends to a road that is tertiary or higher, and this does not.

Could you please change this back? Thanks!
Glassman (2023-05-27 05:22:18+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136603158
eggie (2023-05-26 20:27:20+00:00): Tip.. In OSM zetten we geen adressen op de gebouwomtrek.  Er zijn al adresnodes.
Het geeft anders verwarring.
Hier zie je waar je dat hebt gedaan.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=136603671
Die adressen kunnen er dus weer af.
gr eggie
eggie (2023-05-26 21:55:36+00:00): adressen verwijderd van gebouwomtrek.
Josef73 (2023-05-27 19:28:47+00:00): Hello, can you the values of the tag opening_hours. Please check the wiki-site at: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours for the right syntax. Thanks.
Andrea Musuruane (2023-05-27 09:04:36+00:00): Ciao Michele. sidewalk=both? https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=302731394727758
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136603965
mikki65 (2023-05-27 11:19:07+00:00): volevo specificare che nella parte destra vi  e' il percorso pedonale evidenziato da linea e nella parte sinistra no solo parcheggi pensavo  che si considerasse come marciapiede
PatrickKnopf (2023-05-26 20:29:32+00:00): Finalized in josm
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 01:57:13+00:00): It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town". 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place#Populated_settlements,_urban_and_rural

Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 01:57:06+00:00): It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town". 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place#Populated_settlements,_urban_and_rural

Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12
felipeeugenio (2023-05-26 23:48:38+00:00): Hola
Porque service?
parece ser una calle residencial mas.
además por favor siempre agregar surface=
saludos
Luzandro (2023-06-20 04:12:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3742826
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 01:57:00+00:00): It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town". 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place#Populated_settlements,_urban_and_rural

Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12
Peer van Daalen (2023-06-12 15:26:55+00:00): Hallo @FahrradstadtAachen

Ist wohl einstweilen nur eine temporäre Einrichtung diese Toilettenanlage. Näheres hier:

https://epaper.aachener-zeitung.de/data/10073/reader/reader.html#!preferred/0/package/10073/pub/20788/page/10/alb/257833

Gruß | Peer
Peer van Daalen (2023-06-12 15:28:29+00:00): Hab es als Notiz mal beigefügt.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10929975915#map=19/50.77223/6.07084
StC (2023-06-05 20:36:53+00:00): Bonjour,

pouvez-vous commenter cette modification svp ? les outils d'historique ne permettent pas d'analyser facilement les modifications sur les relations, et j'ai l'impression que celle-ci a brisé la continuité de l'itinéraire européen E4.

Cordialement,

StC
Jean François Vole (2023-06-06 06:45:08+00:00): Bonjour,

L'itinéraire E4 ne passe pas dans cette zone.
StC (2023-06-06 07:36:07+00:00): Bonjour,
là n'est pas la question : c'est précisément un ajout intempestif que je devais comprendre. Il se trouve que c'est un autre grand itinéraire qui a été endommagé par ce changeset-ci, mais il m'a fallu beaucoup de temps pour tout démêler.
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 19:25:18+00:00): Why was this moved?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136605034
Eman_Mehrez (2023-05-29 06:38:46+00:00): Hello Abdullah Al Werfalli;
I noticed you added "oneway=reversible" and this tag will make Routing engines should not route over this type of oneway without knowing about oneway scheduled times.
and if you see KartaView Tracks this street is bi directions and there is no sign to add time for this street.
Link kartaview:
https://kartaview.org/map/@32.84704423357137,13.1520183985117,18z
Link for the street:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28339883
I fixed this issue.
Regards
Eman_Mehrez
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 01:56:45+00:00): It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town". 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place#Populated_settlements,_urban_and_rural

Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12
mariotomo (2023-05-29 04:46:29+00:00): hi. Welcome to OSM. Thanks for contributing. Can you connect this path to the other "walkable" objects? As it is now, it has triggered this warnings:disconnected_way:highway
mariotomo (2023-05-29 04:52:32+00:00): Also: who can access this path? Maybe "permissive", or "private" are the right values? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Layft Greater (2023-05-26 21:40:02+00:00): in Limassol District
RinBalzo (2023-05-26 22:12:20+00:00): Nella modifica precedente avevo rimosso dei tag surface=asphalt per errore. In questa modifica li ho riaggiunti
Road–Runner (2023-10-11 20:42:37+00:00): Der Klettersteig am Glungezer wurde von dir im Zuge des Reverts auf highway:path gesetzt. Ich habe das wiederhergestellt.
Hungerburg (2023-10-11 21:14:35+00:00): Ahh, wohl zu sehr in Bausch und Bogen revertiert. Die Relation könnte auch noch geändert werden? Damit es auf waymarked-trails nicht als Wanderweg aufscheint?
Road–Runner (2023-10-12 21:48:20+00:00): Kein Problem :).

Meinst du die Relation 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14442660#map=14/47.2119/11.5252&layers=C

Es sind aber andere Klettersteige auch als route=hiking gemappt?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6428688#map=15/47.3090/11.3653&layers=C
Layft Greater (2023-05-26 22:43:40+00:00): based on road refs
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-11-16 15:27:52+00:00): Hi, I saw that you have added some tags with NA as a value (for example farm_name=NA, loc_name=NA, ownership=NA). I guess that this is some kind of import of data where NA was with no value (Not Available).

If I am correct, can you remove these values from all edits that you have made or do you have another explanation for this value?
SomeoneElse (2023-11-17 13:42:37+00:00): There are a bunch of lat and long values added as tags too - I'm guessing a copy and paste faux pas.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-11-17 13:46:32+00:00): I will clear all the tags that make no sense if the user does not respond soon
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-28 22:33:48+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 136557095, 136557254, 136557361, 136557452, 136557483, 136557567, 136557628, 136557644, 136557755, 136557767, 136557843, 136557861, 136557948, 136557965, 136557997, 136558585, 136558649, 136558837, 136558843, 136558873, 136558932, 136559260, 136559308, 136559339, 136559367, 136559512, 136559593, 136559617, 136559647, 136559890, 136559987, 136560399, 136560492, 136560558, 136560594, 136560636, 136560909, 136561023, 136561063, 136561094, 136561151, 136561251, 136561297, 136561418, 136561492, 136561505, 136561545, 136561550, 136561555, 136561557, 136561564, 136561637, 136561716, 136561912, 136561938, 136561968, 136561976, 136561991, 136561998, 136562026, 136562046, 136562064, 136562089, 136562103, 136562230, 136562237, 136562239, 136562240, 136562244, 136562254, 136562257, 136562263, 136562265, 136562273, 136562307, 136598226, 136598241, 136598263, 136598354, 136598420, 136598443.
mariotomo (2023-05-28 08:52:56+00:00): hi. why did you remove this element? there definitely  is an object there. It may be wrongly tagged, and you're welcome to fix it, but there is an open space there, linking unmapped residential paths.
smaptious (2023-05-30 21:55:20+00:00): Hi mariotomo, Thanks for reaching out. I originally removed this way because it was previously mapped as residential road area feature not connected to any drivable road network. It makes sense that it could be a pedestrian area with connecting paths here. I will undelete the feature https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/780287926, reclassify it and add in the missing paths in the area. Thanks again and have a good day.
tux67 (2023-05-27 06:35:25+00:00): Hallo bernd_41515,

da das Gebäude sowohl auf den aktuellen NRW DOP Luftbildern, als auch in den Kartasterdaten existiert, nutzen wir in solchen Fällen Lifecycle Tags anstelle der Löschung des Gebäudes. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
Das vermeidet einen Neueintrag von Mappern, die nach Luftbild mappen.
Außerdem solltest du bitte beim Hochladen des Änderungssatzes deine Quellen angeben.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136607347
Colin Smale (2023-05-27 11:14:17+00:00): Unfortunately the tagging for your new Pudsey relation is rather incorrect. You have replaced incomplete data with incorrect data which means it will no longer get flagged up to people with the knowledge to fix it properly... This is not improving the map quality, but just suppressing the warnings. You wouldn't take the oil pressure indicator out of your car would you?
user_177389 (2023-05-27 21:42:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175583386 was a closed ring and therefore just as technically valid (but wrong) in tagging and form as the new relation. Its new tagging with boundary=administrative and admin_level=8 was suspect, so I only looked at its history.
wolfbert (2025-04-06 08:31:07+00:00): Hallo, hast Du für die maxspeed in der Griestraße https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8104307 einen aktuellen Beleg? Auf alten Bildern ist das wahlweise 30er Zone oder Wohnstraße.
copros (2025-05-07 21:20:27+00:00): Siehe meine Erklärung zu deinem Kommentar für Änderungssatz 127070040, ich nehme an, hier war es ähnlich. Bitte gerne meinen Eintrag ändern, ich konnte ihn selbst noch nicht verifizieren.
wolfbert (2025-05-08 07:18:39+00:00): Ok, habe einen Hinweis gesetzt, vielleicht kümmert sich jemand.