piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_18305684 (2023-05-20 16:20:26+00:00): I think it is an error : the water of the river does not "disappear", it merges with the canal then goes outside the canal : the parts of the canal should be part of the relation for the 2 relations Eider and Giselau (like when a river goes through a lake, the water merges with the lake, there is no more river but we connect the entrance in the lake and the exit of the lake with a way in the middle of the lake, a false way required only to have a waterway with no gap).
puma515 (2023-05-20 19:31:18+00:00): I understand your approach, but the parts are not connected on the spot, they flow into the channel. However, the canal is not part of these rivers, the canal drains into the North Sea via the locks in Brunsbüttel, there is only one weir as a further connection for water level regulation at the lock of the Giselau Canal.
That's why I wouldn't add the parts of the channel to the relations. But I'm not sure about that either, because I have too little to do with waterway relations. If you want to adjust these relations, I would suggest that you discuss this in the forum first.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56
German forum, you can write in English, it translates automartically.

Best regards puma515
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-13 20:10:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10894588420

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2023-05-13 20:37:24+00:00): Moin Freiberufler,

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand deine  Änderung ansieht. Ich habe nur das aktuelle Luftbild von Hessen zur Verfügung um deine Änderung zu beurteilen.
Wenn dieser Abschnitt der K 47 für den Verkehr freigegeben ist, ist das, was du da geändert hast, vermutlich korrekt. Es wäre einfacher, wenn du (grundsätzlich) die Quelle deiner Information angeben würdest. So kann ich leider nur Vermutungen anstellen.
Im östlichen Bereich befindet sich um die Straße herum noch als Baustelle gekennzeichnetes Gelände. Hast du eine Ahnung, wie der Stand vor Ort gerade ist?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136065709
Freiberufler (2023-05-14 10:46:39+00:00): Dieser ABschnitt ist freigegeben. Bin ihn heute mit dem Auto und google maps abgefahren
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136065709
silversurfer83 (2023-05-17 08:25:55+00:00): Top. Danke
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136065709
silversurfer83 (2023-05-13 20:38:47+00:00): Hi
[gleicher Text, wie bei der anderen Änderung] ;)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136065748
Freiberufler (2023-05-14 10:47:16+00:00): Heut e abgefahren
silversurfer83 (2023-05-13 20:43:46+00:00): Hi
ich schon wieder :)

Thema "charge=*": Ich verstehe nicht, was du beim Wasserski mit "50" ausdrücken möchtest und die "4 EUR ganzer Tag" kann leider auch kein Datenauswerter auswerten, außer es als reinen Text anzuzeigen.
Hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:charge findest du Details dazu, wie du die Werte besser erfassen kannst.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136065976
Freiberufler (2023-05-14 10:51:45+00:00): Beim Wasserski kostet die Jahreskarte für den Parkplatz 50 EUR.
Danke für den Hinweis mit dem Parkplatz
FahrradstadtAachen (2023-05-15 16:31:12+00:00): Moin! 
Der proposed-Lifecycle-Prefix ist hier meines Erachtens nicht richtig eingesetzt. Mit proposed:building werden geplante Gebäude bezeichnet; der Schuppen hier ist allerdings bereits errichtet. Deine erwähnten Nutzungsbeschränkungen könnten stattdessen besser z. B. mit dem access-Tag erfasst werden.
Viele Grüße!
Peer van Daalen (2023-05-15 16:38:37+00:00): So besser?
-
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159982693#map=19/50.77660/6.08729
-
Gruß | Peer
FahrradstadtAachen (2023-05-15 19:33:10+00:00): Super! Danke :)
IIVQ (2023-05-21 17:24:02+00:00): Beste OttoR, is deze weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7045212 al klaar en open, en gezien in het veld dat dat zo is? Je hebt hem 8 dagen geleden ingetekend maar toen ik er een maand geleden langs wandelde had ik niet het idee dat volledige openstelling nu al im frage zou zijn.
Bovendien gebruik je hashtags foot en bike, maar heb je de weg nu voor iedereen toegankelijk (en zonder straatnaam).
Langlaeufer (2023-05-13 21:26:20+00:00): Hi, woher kommt das motor_vehicle=no? Steht da neuerdings ein Schild oder gibt es eine Barriere
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136066122
Snoiprocs (2023-05-15 19:06:31+00:00): Schilder verwechselt. Dort gibt es nur einen Hinweis auf einen regionalen Fahrradweg aber kein Schild "Fahrradweg".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136066122
superkiria (2023-05-14 17:46:24+00:00): Привет!
Классно, что вы добавили название улицы!
В результате вашей правки вся улица проезжая стала мостом (там везде тэг bridge=yes, а этот тэг должен быть только там, где сам мост)
superkiria (2023-05-14 17:49:26+00:00): Привет!
Тут не нужно указывать название дороги, если она никак не называется, и в названии тип объекта не пишем.
Тэги foot=yes, bicycle=yes можно не указывать, так как yes - это значение по умолчанию для них. (Эти тэги обозначают юридическое право там передвигаться, а не физическую возможность).
VLD549 (2023-06-13 06:38:00+00:00): Hi, could you let me know the source you've used? According to their site it is DSM Nutritional Products Ltd
https://www.dsm.com/corporate/our-company/our-presence.html

Thank you!
Martin Borsje (2023-06-13 09:23:33+00:00): DSM merged recently with Firmenich and is now called dsm-firmenich.
Trust me: I am an employee.
VLD549 (2023-08-10 06:58:50+00:00): Okay, thank you for confirming. :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 16:01:29+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10894634427/history has amenity = water that was added in this edit
amenity=water? What is this?

If it is place with drinking water amenity=drinking_water is typically
used.

man_made=water_tap may be added if it is a water tap.

man_made=water_tap with drinking_water=no is typically used to indicate
tap without drinking water

see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=water
Masyas (2023-05-14 02:22:14+00:00): 这么画要被打的（
eggie (2023-09-23 09:22:58+00:00): Hoi Otto... Hoe zou het zijn het de voortgang van de recondtructie?
Je edits zijn van mei dit jaar.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-23 09:29:46+00:00): Nog even zie ik al
https://www.amsterdam.nl/projecten/wielingenstraat#PagCls_16893208
OttoR (2023-09-24 10:37:44+00:00): Hallo eggie,
Zoals aangegeven: opening date = Mei 2023 :-)

Nu is tot eind Oktober de zuidzeide aan de beurt. https://zuidas.nl/blog/2023/05/04/werk-in-wielingenstraat-aan-overkant-verder/

En daarnaast ook de Diepenbrockstraat gaat op de schop: https://www.amsterdam.nl/projecten/diepenbrockstraat/

Ik denk dat ik het weer correct heb staan; maar er gebeurd nogal veel tegelijk in fases :-)
eggie (2023-09-24 10:55:09+00:00): Hoi Otto..
Zal eens wel goedkomen.
Er is nu een startende lokale mapper actief hier die het ook in de gaten houdt.
Die zou ook vast wel hulp kunnen gebruiken.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3902048

Groet..
eggie
user_5359 (2023-05-14 05:23:48+00:00): Welcometo OSM! Don‘t remove existing and correct noticed ways!
emersonveenstra (2023-05-14 10:09:48+00:00): Yeah, there's really no point in deleting, someone else will just re-add it eventually. It's marked as private, so apps and consumers understand it isn't for public use.
DaveClark35 (2023-05-14 13:27:56+00:00): This is a driveway on personal property.  Consumers do not realize this is personal property - someone has trespassed on my property and claimed it is public access because they saw it on some mapping service.

Unless you're willing to personally pay to add a gate to keep people out of my driveway, then do not re-add this marking.
user_5359 (2023-05-14 18:24:15+00:00): I spare myself any comment and advise you against further deletions.
emersonveenstra (2023-05-14 19:54:16+00:00): The map clearly states its a private driveway, so if someone cant read the map and is trespassing on your property, then thats something the police need to deal with. OpenStreetMap is meant to be a open map of the whole world, including driveways. I dont care if your driveway is there or not, but eventually someone will re-add it, and if you get into a back and forth edit war with them, youll be the one who is banned for deleting correct data, unfortunately, as its considered a form of vandalism (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism).
So again, if someone incorrectly thinks that your driveway is public when the map clearly shows it isnt, then thats something law enforcement will need to deal with, thats not really something we can control
user_18305684 (2023-05-14 13:40:14+00:00): Hi,

welcome on osm.

your relation 15851732 was not working, maybe you should read the wiki about multipolygons : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

I fixed this relation.

Best regards
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-13 21:10:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537002044
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/937311364

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Pitrenet (2023-06-01 07:33:28+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour vos contributions.

En suivant le principe d'OSM « One feature, one OSM element », et si vous connaissez les limites de l'école, il faut mieux taguer une zone en reprenant les attributs du nœud. C'est mieux que de taguer tous les bâtiments de l'école.

Vous pouvez prendre exemple sur l'École primaire privée Sainte-Jeanne d'Arc (way 361071322)

Le même problème se pose pour l'ADMR par exemple (dans ce cas il faut mieux mettre un nœud).

Voir :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Un_item,_un_objet_OSM

P.S : toutes les contributions sont les bienvenues, ce n'est pas du tout grave de faire des petites erreurs ;)
akiabzh (2023-06-01 16:16:34+00:00): Bonsoir Pitrenet,
Oui, cette contribution était une de mes premières et je n'ai sans doute pas choisi le meilleur outil pour indiquer l'emplacement de cette école.
Je ferai mieux la prochaine fois.
Cordialement
Pitrenet (2023-06-01 07:41:40+00:00): Bonjour,

Comment avez-vous déterminé l'emplacement du repère ? Sur le terrain ?

D'après la fiche IGN, il devrait se trouver au pied du monument aux morts, mais le monument a été déplacé avec les travaux de la place devant l'église.
akiabzh (2023-06-01 16:21:52+00:00): Bonsoir,
Oui les travaux beaucoup modifiés la place.
Le repère que j'ai vu est le 188 qui est bien déclaré sur le site de l'IGN contre le mur de l'école.
Pitrenet (2023-06-02 09:10:28+00:00): Bonjour,

Je pense qu'il ne s'agit pas du même repère, et je ne pense pas que les repères puissent être déplacés par l'IGN.

Il existe bien deux fiches distinctes :
https://geodesie.ign.fr/fiches/pdf/3517603.pdf
https://geodesie.ign.fr/fiches/pdf/QR-188_300582.pdf

Les deux fiches indiquent une vérification en 2010, donc dans la même année et avant les travaux.
Emilius123 (2023-05-14 10:22:33+00:00): Danke, Chef
Endres Pelka (2023-05-14 11:34:17+00:00): @Emilius123
Kein Problem :) Nur ein kleiner Detail, den ich mir beim Autofahren gemerkt habe.
kakiremora (2023-05-18 20:11:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3912598739

Coś niedobrego tu się zdarzyło.

Pozdrawiam
kakiremora (2023-05-18 20:14:30+00:00): ^^Poprawione
torger (2023-05-22 19:21:17+00:00): What has happened here? Road geometry has been moved to incorrect positions. You can't trust Bing imagery to be correctly aligned. NVDB is way more accurate, and if you don't trust that, look at Strava tracks and compare. The whole road network of Arjeplog municipality was refreshed in the NVDB project in 2021: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Sweden_highway_import/Progress

Please revert this whole change, or at least the parts that worsen alignment of roads.
lipuma (2023-05-14 11:31:29+00:00): Hi, I see you added a lot of crossings in this changeset. That's great! However, you used the tag `crossing:signal'. (See this overpass query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1uW2)

I think you meant to use `crossing:signals'.
BubbleGuppies (2023-05-17 17:50:33+00:00): Good catch! I updated my preset file to fix my typo. It looks like everything is fixed, I appreciate it.
lipuma (2023-05-14 11:10:34+00:00): Hi, I see you added 4 informal footpaths in this changeset. But all of these footpaths are disconnected from all other roads. Are you sure this is correct?

Ways:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1172470509
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1172615226
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1172470511
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1172470510
wegerje (2023-05-15 00:45:53+00:00): These footways are on private property. In order to verify them they must be discovered on the ground via the map. They are likely either old farm access tracks or temporary timber tracks. They show up on the 3DEP lidar imagery. They are informal=yes because no one is currently maintaining them. I know because I am an owner representative for Karma Farm Inc.

Thank you for checking.
lipuma (2023-05-15 18:28:23+00:00): I see, thanks for the response! 3DEP lidar imagery sounds very interesting.
wegerje (2023-05-16 03:08:56+00:00): JOSM - Imagery / USGS 3D Elevation Program

Some places have better detail than others. SW Michigan has had it for years. Just now saw that central Wisconsin has the better detail version. JOSM has more features than I know how to use. :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-28 20:33:13+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=pizza
Andrea Musuruane (2023-10-17 08:54:18+00:00): Ciao. Sono un po' perplesso da questa way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1172615832 Credo di non aver mai visto un sentiero a senso unico. Ciao, Andrea
Moreno Fazio (2023-10-17 09:35:13+00:00): Ciao, scusa non credo di aver aggiunto io questa etichetta.. o c'era già o lo aggiunta inavvertitamente. Lo stesso per l'altra segnalata. Provvedo a sistemarla stasera. Grazie
mueschel (2023-05-14 14:59:08+00:00): Hi,
you added many "crossing:signal" here. Could you check the spelling? The common tag is "crossing:signals".
BubbleGuppies (2023-05-17 17:47:22+00:00): Good catch! I updated my preset file to fix this typo. I appreciate you fixing them for me.
MxxCon (2023-05-16 05:21:30+00:00): Hello.
Once again, description= tag should NOT be used as your personal changeset comment!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136069760
UKChris (2024-10-19 17:48:54+00:00): What did you remove from this location, as this was never the site of the Staplegrove Inn - the pub was by the mini roundabout further to the East.
cyclehunter (2023-05-30 19:19:45+00:00): Why did you remove the planned power plant? Do you have a source for that?
I had the Environmental
Statement listed as a source in my changeset and an article from 2 months ago suggests that it is going to be built. https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/23423610.government-energy-plan-includes-funding-net-zero-teesside/
vaibhavnz (2023-05-31 00:30:06+00:00): Oh dear, my apologies. Ill see if I can fix that up shortly.
felipeeugenio (2023-06-04 13:11:21+00:00): Estimado, por favor ojo con el uso de lag eisure=park
Definitivamente no aplica en la mayoría de los usos que le da.
saludos
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-07-06 22:22:02+00:00): removed, no road here!
Glassman (2023-05-14 14:31:45+00:00): What makes West 38th Avenue private that would prevent routers from taking people to their house? Is there a gate that can't be seen on the imager or is it posted no trespassing?
Emilius123 (2023-05-14 10:24:08+00:00): Gesundheit.
highflyer74 (2023-05-15 05:52:46+00:00): Moin Fabi2!

Hat es einen Grund warum hier eine Relation für einen einfachen POI entstanden ist?

Viele Grüße aus dem Norden!
user_125718 (2023-05-15 19:39:35+00:00): Ja.

Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Healthcare_2.0#Usage_of_the_health-relation

Das ist einmal die Einrichtung und dann die Personen die dort arbeiten.

Ich habe ja schon Leute gesehen, die setzen einen Node für jeden Arzt in einer Gemeinschaftspraxis....
archpdx (2023-05-15 06:15:18+00:00): Hi,

It looks like this bus stop is already mapped:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10733763352

Also please note that the "Bus Station" preset should only be used for bus terminals/transit centers (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbus_station)
user_19256963 (2023-05-16 04:01:04+00:00): Oh, I see. I didn’t know that. I’m very new to this!! Thanks for letting me know!
archpdx (2023-05-15 06:18:05+00:00): Already mapped here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10733763293
nevw (2023-05-15 09:10:31+00:00): Hi, there is a problem with the roles here....as drawn, they are all outers.
I think this needs mapping differently if all these parts are part of the one resort.
I wouldn't use a relation for this.
I woulds map the perimeter of the land of the resort and add the resort tags, then I would map the buildings within using building=yes, etc and the swimming pool as is.
You could use a site relation I guess if preferred. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:site
nevw (2023-05-15 09:12:49+00:00): Osmi https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.46543&lat=-16.48722&zoom=17
snippet (2023-05-15 09:47:41+00:00): Ah ok, Thanks for that. Still learning the tools but i'll have a go at fixing it.
Jarek 🚲 (2024-12-03 01:54:37+00:00): Hi, can you tell us a little more about this edit that changed Wychwood Park roadways from access=permissive to access=private?

access=private means that individual permission is always required to enter, for everyone.

A "private road" or "private property" might not necessarily be access=private. It was previously tagged access=permissive which means "Open to general traffic until such time as the owner revokes the permission which they are legally allowed to do at any time in the future."

In https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4350769 there is a report that it's signed as private property, but access is not prohibited.

Could you comment here or on the note linked?

Thanks,
--Jarek
Button_ (2024-12-03 18:46:56+00:00): Where it connects to Davenport at least, there's a closed gate and a sign that says it's private grounds
Jarek 🚲 (2024-12-04 02:18:42+00:00): OK thanks. We have the gate at Davenport https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9602055914 - perhaps that one should have access=private? (currently it's only tagged for deliveries) And access=permissive and ownership=private might be better tagging for the roads.
eggie (2023-05-14 10:15:51+00:00): Dag Josh  
Het gebouw heeft Gemaal Wilgenrijk  . Dus kan de naam met tagging op het gebouw.
Maar hier valt de rendering weg door de brug en de highway tag.
In de rendering ligt een gebouw ook altijd boven .. terwijl het in feite onder de brug ligt.
Ik los het wel eens op door building=  te vervangen door building:part=
Ook niet helmaal correct .. want het is geen deel van een groter geheel.
Dus in dit geval schipperen :)
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-05-14 10:16:23+00:00): Maar wel een keuze maken tussen adresnode en gebouwe .. niet en .. en ..
pza (2023-05-15 03:16:18+00:00): This change you accidently moved Liverpool St, probably while panning around in the ID editor.  I've fixed this in 136106398.  I've left the foot=no change to The Crescent, however I would have thought that the existing sidewalk=none tag would have been enough?
brad windon (2023-05-20 10:11:33+00:00): Thanks. I use an app that maps runs on all streets. This one comes up as runable… but I should check how the query deals with sidewalk conditions.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-26 15:20:34+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6761919554/history has shop = fast_food that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=fast_food ? Is it amenity=fast_food ? If not, what this tag is intended to mean? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfast_food
Mir76 (2024-10-26 16:00:00+00:00): Of course, that should be an amenity. Corrected.
goodidea (2023-05-16 13:32:57+00:00): Hi! After the mechanical edit that took place, I also started reviewing and adding tags to paths that have material=sandstone now.

As far as I understood, ways with surface=paving_stones should be tagged with paving_stones:surface=sandstone instead of surface=sandstone. See Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:material ("For surface=paving_stones there is paving_stones:material=* tag")

Unfortunately, it is a special case (I also find it a bit strange to be honest + increases the effort). but perhaps the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1070794775 should be changed ... Best regards!
oba510 (2023-05-14 06:09:38+00:00): Your company is not located in a big triangular building in the middle of Folsom Street.  If it's a real company, with a actual physical office, please feel free to add it at it's actual location (without the ad copy please).
mueschel (2023-05-16 10:40:35+00:00): Hi,
please check your 'parking' tags here: There can't be a ":side:" in the key - this part has to be replaced by one of left/right/both.
ika-chan! UK-USA (2023-05-16 17:24:23+00:00): I think I have corrected the tags now.
Andrea Musuruane (2023-05-19 16:13:35+00:00): Hi! Are you sure about lanes=2 on the roundabout? I can't see any here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=216809704132587 BR, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136072943
ika-chan! UK-USA (2023-05-19 20:11:34+00:00): I also just fixed that.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-14 06:50:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1699430307

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse (2023-06-15 10:22:00+00:00): Which ancient Romans did you interview to get the new name? :)
GerdP (2023-05-14 09:47:42+00:00): Korrektur: Bilder stammen von Radtour am 13.5. (copy+paste Fehler)
JuanCarlos80 (2023-05-14 07:33:48+00:00): Hi DTrx, 
crossing=marked bezeichnet einen Zebrastreifenübergang, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:crossing%3Dmarked :
"Dieses Attribut beschreibt einen Fußgängerübergang, der markiert ist, aber nicht durch Ampel oder Personen geregelt wird. .. Die landesspezifische Bezeichnung der Übergangsart ... In Deutschland ist nur der Begriff 'Zebrastreifen' ... gebräuchlich" etc.

Alles andere ist "unmarked", auch wenn das zunächst kontraintuitiv erscheint.

Gruß
J.
DTrx (2023-05-14 09:33:29+00:00): Hi  JuanCarlos80, Danke für den Hinweis. Ich dachte ich hätte etwas sinvolles geändert ;-)
Eines Tages kapier ich die OSM vielleicht doch noch.
PiaVespRoll (2023-05-14 08:01:26+00:00): Jetzt sehe ich im Google Streetview dass dieser Kreisverkehr doch gibt. Bein Navi ist mir aufgefallen, dass es extremt versetzt Kreisverkehr führt, was ich hier zuerst im Bing Luftbild gesehen habe, dass es kein Kreisverkehr vorhanden ist. Nun in SF schon. Wie kann ich das wieder rückgängig machen?
PiaVespRoll (2023-05-14 08:54:40+00:00): Kreisverkehr etc. habe ich wieder gezeichnet. Denke ist nun abgeschlossen.
SomeoneElse (2023-05-16 16:50:08+00:00): Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2361007180/history is still a shop at all?  What action did you take to verify it?
If none, how does what you have done here improve the quality of OSM?