piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mintsoft (2023-09-18 13:47:40+00:00): Yeah, I can totally see what's happened there. When I've merged the buildings into one, I didn't realise it would merge the metadata about the buildings into one (which is obvious really with hindsight).  

I'll tidy this up.
Indiaosm (2023-06-04 10:37:34+00:00): ANDHWADI,KAPADSINGI
GinaroZ (2023-06-05 15:26:42+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits. 
Can you access this road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157528279 from the east? (ie the Canmore Street junction)
jxpsert (2023-06-04 12:57:28+00:00): This is a massive editing area. It's generally not appreciated to make changes in multiple continents at once.
trigpoint (2023-06-04 13:00:40+00:00): You have two pubs with the same name at the same location. Why?
silversurfer83 (2023-06-04 16:53:41+00:00): Hello Shake71, dear colleagues,

change set metadata suggest this edit was made using the app "maps.me" which allows editing POIs. Sadly, there are frequently users of this app that misunderstand the feature "add X to map" as a personal note book feature when in reality this will add the POI to the database of OpenStreetMap. A database used by millions of people every day.
Also, maps.me data is always way older than the information stored in the database at any given time. So sometimes people don't see a POI they are adding in their app while it's already there in the database.

Shake71, should you wish to contribute to OpenStreetMap you're more than welcome to do so. Please choose a different app for that.

Should you have any questions: We're more than happy to help. Check out the chat possibilities here
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers

save travels
silversurfer83

ps: double entires will simply be deleted or merged.
mueschel (2023-06-06 08:31:18+00:00): Hi,
you added some nodes with a new tag "naptan:ParentLocalityName = London" - shouldn't that be "naptan:ParentLocality"?
qugeb (2025-01-03 11:46:59+00:00): Hallo froschpi,

kannst du eventuell etwas zu dieser Frage (die sich auf den von dir ergänzten Park bezieht) beitragen? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4130948
Um welche Art von Picknickplatz handelt es sich denn? Ist hier ein einzelner Picknicktisch (wie hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dpicnic_table) oder ist das ein etwas größerer Picknickplatz (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dpicnic_site)
Beschreibende Namen (wie "Picknickplatz") sollen auf OSM vermieden werden, dafür gibt es ja die Tags.
flohoff (2023-06-04 19:36:03+00:00): Moin,
du hast hier ein maxspeed=30 eingetragen. Dann muss aber das maxspeed:type auch auf sign nicht auf DE:urban - Es muss ja durch Schilder irgendwo angeordnet worden sein.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37332282

Mir ist das aufgefallen weil das massive Routingänderungen verursacht hat.

Von meinen Proberouten sind rund ~40 geschwenkt auf alternative Wege.

Flo
JuanCarlos80 (2023-06-04 21:07:14+00:00): Hi Flo,
ich habe die Schilder heute morgen aus beiden Richtungen betrachten dürfen (zw. Avenwedder Str. und Abzweig Friedrichsdorfer Str./L934/Fußgängerampel): Es handelt sich um T30-Schilder auf quadratischer weißer Tafel.
Im Übrigen sagt DE:urban ja nur, dass ansonsten die StVO gilt.
flohoff (2023-06-04 21:10:51+00:00): Ich weiss. Hab sie sogar mit.mapillarx schon im September fotografiert.

Ich Zweifel auch nicht an das da 30 ist.

Aber das maxspeed:Type sagt das es durch das Ortsschild kommt aber es ist ein maxspeed 30 das gar nicht durch das Ortsschild kommen kann..
Die beiden Tags wiedersprechen sich jetzt


Flo
emergency99 (2023-06-05 14:52:54+00:00): Also hier ist die Nebenfahrbahn wohl genau so die Wiedner Hauptstraße. Die Straßenschilder befinden sich überhaupt nur auf den Häusern, die sich neben der Nebenfahrbahn befinden. Wenn wir hier die Ground Truth mappen sollte der Name hier wohl schon auch drauf.
Flo Ledermann (2023-06-05 14:59:09+00:00): Wir diskutieren das gerade auf der Talk-at Mailingliste... Konsens ist tendenziell, dass nur der Hauptstrang der Straße auch den Namen trägt. Im Endeffekt ist es eine philosophische Diskussion. Ich sehe aber keine Vorteile, weder für die Karte, noch für Anwendungen im Routing etc., daher habe ich den Namen (vorerst) entfernt.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-04 11:42:25+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 135539753, 135539930, 135622682, 135625024, 135625138, 135703826, 135712363, 135714441, 135727487, 135727600, 135728552, 135732838, 135733050, 135738503, 135784775, 135785954, 135786181, 135988087, 135988300, 135988411, 136019005, 136076749, 136129544, 136595051, 136726201, 136740934, 136746193, 136783798, 136786897, 136822472, 136828043, 136828799, 136832764, 136853449.
fmrtn (2023-06-05 13:41:40+00:00): Aquí estás agrupando dos lugares sin relación en la edición.

¿Podrías realizar conjuntos de cambios más pequeños y relacionados entre sí?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136930387
sorcrosc (2023-06-04 17:13:12+00:00): Ho visto che hai aggiunto bicycle=designated alle tracce che hai modificato. Questo significa che sono tracce fatte apposta per le biciclette da strada. Praticamente come piste ciclabili cittadine. Dovresti correggere.
Ciao.
at1839 (2023-06-04 20:21:16+00:00): Grazie per il commento, però magari vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking
sorcrosc (2023-06-04 21:02:25+00:00): Riporto la risposta che mi hai inviato:

"Grazie per il commento, però magari vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking

Secondo me il tag bicycle=* non è ristretto alle bici da strada. Poi non a caso non ho messo highway=cycleway ma highway=path e non ho messo il tag sui sentieri CAI anche se alcuni sono oggettivamente usati, ad oggi, quasi solo dalle MTB … Comunque, tu cosa suggeriresti?

Considera che si tratta di percorsi di fatto riservati alle MTB dove la circolazione a piedi deve essere considerata poco consigliabile, anche se non esplicitamente vietata.

Ciao. Paolo"


Rispondo:

Se fosse bicycle=yes andrebbe anche bene perché le biciclette sono legalmente consentite, anche se il percorso non è adatto a tutti i tipi.

bicycle=designated invece implica che oltre ad essere legale è appositamente designato per le biciclette, tutti i tipi di biciclette. Non può andar bene sui percorsi appositi per le mtb. Questi non si possono considerare percorsi destinati alle biciclette in senso generico.

Ciao
Lorenzo
at1839 (2023-06-04 21:13:39+00:00): Lorenzo, sarò anche d'accordo che allo stato attuale tag specifici per queste way non hanno superato lo stato di proposed, però allo stesso modo ti potrei rispondere che highway=path non può essere destinato a tutti quelli che camminano ... per esempio se è taggato *anche* sac_scale=mountain_hiking.

E' specificamente destinato alle biciclette e il tipo di bici sta su mtb:scale

Comunque se per caso non l'hai già fatto usa overpass ... Ti ho messo mtb:scale=2 giusto per far capire che non sono cycleway. Vedi Finale per esempio

[out:xml];
(
  way
  ["mtb:scale"="2"]
  ["bicycle"="designated"]
     ({{bbox}});
);
out meta;
>;
out meta qt;

Suvvia ... ti ho già chiesto cosa proporresti, ma per favore tieni presente che, ripeto, si tratta di percorsi dedicati alle mtb, percorsi che hanno visto gare enduro ..

Ciao. Paolo

Paolo
at1839 (2023-06-04 21:20:33+00:00): Alla fine ...
Sono appositamente designati per le biciclette? Sì 
Sono percorribili da *tutte* le biciclette? Non è la domanda giusta ma se lo fosse, la risposta è sì, è un tag di tipo legal e non un consiglio sulla salute.
Per quanto riguarda la salute. c'è la scala delle difficoltà.

Paolo
sorcrosc (2023-06-04 21:35:38+00:00): Guarda che non critico i tag mtb, anzi quelli sono il modo corretto per indicare la percorribilità in mountain bike.
Scusa se insisto ma non mi sembra che fai qualcosa di buono inserendo bicycle=designated su percorsi che non sono destinati alle biciclette normali. Cosa vuoi ottenere?
Usare questo tag assieme a highway=path non è diverso da usare highway=cycleway direttamente. Stai mappando questi percorsi come si mappano le piste ciclabili cittadine. La questione della percorribilità legale è soddisfata mettendo semplicemente bicycle=yes.

Lorenzo
at1839 (2023-06-04 21:41:23+00:00): Lorenzo, apri una request for comments su talk.it

Poi questa frase che scrivi NON ha senso ...

Usare questo tag assieme a highway=path non è diverso da usare highway=cycleway direttamente

Vedi la wiki. Vedi overpass. Non scambiare le opinioni con i fatti.
at1839 (2023-06-04 21:43:26+00:00): Cosa vuoi ottenere? 

Voglio ottenere di suggerire che sono percorsi dedicati alle biciclette, non sono *classici* sentieri, anche se non posso mettere foot=no perchè non c'è il cartello di divieto.
sorcrosc (2023-06-04 22:06:39+00:00): Non dovresti neanche mettere bicycle=designated perché, immagino, non ci sono i cartelli blu che li indicano come percorsi per bici.
"Typically bicycle=designated (or highway=cycleway) requires special-purpose traffic signs"
Preso da qui:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Ddesignated

Io non vedrei niente di male ad usare mtb=designated. Non è documentato ha un utilizzo in aumento secondo Taginfo.
Se ne parla un po' nella discussione qui:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:mtb

Lorenzo
at1839 (2023-06-05 08:49:17+00:00): Ti rispondo tramite messaggio perché qui la stiamo facendo decisamente troppo lunga. Paolo.
sorcrosc (2023-06-06 22:02:11+00:00): Non c'è nessun problema a scrivere qui. Non ti riponderò.
at1839 (2023-06-07 12:44:40+00:00): Amen.
Anas masuris (2023-06-16 14:11:43+00:00): Na przyszłość, jak się wycofuje edycję, to proszę sprawdzić relacje. Musiałem wszystko pozłączać i ponumerować tory ponownie!

Już łatwiej to ręcznie zrobić, przynajmniej też nie zostają buble ani nie znikają tory
maraf24 (2023-06-18 13:22:31+00:00): Nie, skutki zawsze obciążąją autora wycofanego zestawu, bo to on przekroczył czerwoną linię.
aixbrick (2023-06-06 07:11:13+00:00): Danke :-)
Peter Elderson (2025-03-02 20:40:22+00:00): Hallo DLMax, Wat bedoel je hier met crossing=no? Het voetpad kruist hier de weg, dus dat is een crossing, al hoef je dat niet speciaal te taggen.
DLMax (2025-03-05 15:46:33+00:00): Hoi Peter Elderson,
Jouw verhaal is duidelijk en deze fout zou ik in iD of Potlatch ook niet snel hebben gemaakt.
Dit waren wijzigingen die ik maakte met Streetcomplete. Waarom ik deze fout maakte komt hieronder aan bod:

Streetcomplete (tot en met v60.1) gaf bij kruisende wegen de volgende Engelse vraag met andtwoordopties: (Afbeelding: https://f.dlmax.org/sharex/2025/03/Screenshot_20250302-230135.Street_Complete.png)
"Is There a crossing here?"
Option 1: Yes, intended as crossing
Option 2: Not intended as crossing, still possible to cross (e.g. informal trails)
Option 3: No, crossing is prohibited or impossible

En in het Nederlands: "Is hier een oversteekplaats?" (Afbeelding: https://f.dlmax.org/sharex/2025/03/Screenshot_20250302-225917.Street_Complete.png)
Optie 1: Ja (de stoeprand is verlaagd, er zijn markeringen, etc)
Optie 2: Nee, maar oversteken is mogelijk
Optie 3: Nee, oversteken is verboden of onmogelijk

De Nederlandse vertaling is niet heel duidelijk, waardoor je al snel voor optie 2 kiest, als er geen markeringen en/of verlaagde stoeprand is, terwijl je volgens de Engelse vraag met antwoorden juist voor optie 1 zou kiezen.

Ik zag net dat het vandaag in v60.2 is aangepast in het Nederlands naar: (Afbeelding: https://f.dlmax.org/sharex/2025/03/Screenshot_20250305-160758.Street_Complete.png)
"Is hier een oversteekplaats?"
Optie 1: Ja, bedoeld als oversteekplaats
Optie 2: Niet bedoeld als oversteekplaats, maar oversteken mogelijk (bij informele paden bijv.)
Optie 3: Nee, oversteken is verboden of onmogelijk

Dit is duidelijker en voorkomt de door mij gemaakte fouten dan ook.

Heb deze kruisingen aangepast.
DLMax (2025-03-05 15:50:58+00:00): (Oh en ik bedoelde JOSM ipv Potlatch ;))
fmrtn (2023-06-05 13:35:20+00:00): Esto no es Montolivet.

¿Podrías ser más específico en los comentarios de tus ediciones? Echa un vistazo a esta página https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136930729
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-06-05 13:23:01+00:00): Moin hockieSC,

wenn wie hier der Geh/Radweg als separate Linie gemappt ist, dann bitte auch so bei StreetComplete angeben. Der Eintrag heißt "separat auf Karte eingezeichnet".

Ich korrigiere das.

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
hockie (2023-06-05 15:55:37+00:00): Hallo Roger,
ich habe es jetzt richtig eingetragen. Der Fuss- und Radweg verläuft an der Stelle nur durch einen Bordstein getrennt and er Straße.
Grüße
Hockie
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-06-06 06:40:41+00:00): Moin Hockie,

ich habe den Geh/Radweg wieder hergestellt. Auch den Übergang, den Du gelöscht hast. Ein Geh-/Radweg darf grundsätzlich auch separat eingetragen werden, das ist schon in Ordnung und sogar besser/detaillierter, sofern die Verbindungen zum Straßennetz korrekt erfasst wurde. Ich habe daher die Verbindung zur gegenüberliegenden Einfahrt noch ergänzt.

Was aber viel interessanter ist: Weißt Du welche Oberfläche das Teilstück hat und welches Verkehrszeichen dort steht? Ist es ein gemeinsamer Geh- und Radweg mit Zeichen 240 oder ein Gehweg mit "Rad frei"?

Viele Grüße
rarad74 (2023-06-04 13:44:29+00:00): Nowhere is interdicted or documented any interditciton to map trees. If there is tag for tree, then anyone can add them if reflects reality.
bayosm (2023-06-04 12:36:20+00:00): Здравствуйте. Тег name используется только для названия. Свойства объекта задаются другими специальными тегами, описание рекомендуется сохранять в теге description. Поэтому не должно быть таких названий как у вас: "Стадион школы", "хоз. постройка", "деревянная изба". Пожалуйста исправьте. Подробнее про тег name - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name и  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия
Dimacn (2023-06-04 13:41:01+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавления на карту. Но добавлю замечаний. 1. Пивоварку не надо было разрывать при прохождении по озерцам. И название на всех фрагментах должно быть одинаково - Пивоварка. 2. Когда добавляете пешеходные переходы, пожалуйста соединяйте их с пешеходным дорожками для поддержки пешеходной навигации.
3. Не надо было удалять из парка Юбилейный внутренние полигоны обозначающие поляны без леса.
bernardo60 (2023-12-25 11:29:35+00:00): Way 1178763610 was not a track, but a path, only 1.2m wide. There are many ways in Bali far too narrow for 4-wheel-vehicles, but enough for motorbikes. If you import based on aerial map, better err on the side of caution, call it a path unless you know better, otherwise drivers can get into problems. Thank you and Merry Christmas!
LockOnGuy (2023-06-05 02:22:23+00:00): Why did you made the link 2 ways?     
There is a sign that said do not turn! please revert.
Aya Samir (2023-06-05 06:41:10+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy;
Thank you for bringing my attention and I fixed it now
Regards
Aya Samir
silversurfer83 (2023-06-04 16:30:05+00:00): Hi again,

You've already been asked to read and understand the wiki articles on Good Changeset Comments and general Good Practice here at OpenStreetMap.

It's sad to see you ignoring these guidelines. Please, read these and act accordingly, thank you.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
mavl (2024-11-13 10:14:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159083843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
trial (2023-06-10 19:57:10+00:00): Tu dois pouvoir résoudre cette note : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3728190
Je crois que le coin est à reprendre vu l'ortho.
mga_geo (2023-06-13 05:49:42+00:00): Bonjour,
Je viens de supprimer l'arrêt de la relation route_master car cette relation ne doit contenir que des relations route cf https://nlehuby.5apps.com/bien-cartographier-les-bus.html
Marc
fehlerfinder (2023-11-24 17:27:19+00:00): Moin Gerd,
cool, dass du so viele nicht erfasste Hydranten eingetragen hast!
Allerdings ist mir aufgefallen, dass du den Hydranten größtenteils den Straßennamen oder eine Beschreibung ihrer Lage als "name" verpasst hast. In Openstreetmap sollen jedoch nur Eigennamen als "name" eingetragen werden, keine Beschreibungen. Siehe auch im Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen unter "Namen sind keine Beschreibungen". Kannst du die Namen aus den von dir angelegten Hydranten wieder entfernen und in Zukunft auf den Namen verzichten?
Viele Grüße
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-02 10:28:07+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10951576553/history has fixme:type = 唐揚げ that was added in this edit
Would amenity=fast_food fit here? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=fast_food
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-04 14:41:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136934793 where the changeset comment is: See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-edits-in-italy/97706/59
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-04 14:41:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136934793 where the changeset comment is: See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-edits-in-italy/97706/59
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-04 14:41:38+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 136934417, 136934429, 136934447, 136934620.
MelancholicSlav (2023-06-04 20:11:17+00:00): Thanks for fixing that, didn't mean to completely nix the multipolygon when toying with the parking lots. When I have time I'll definitely do a survey of TBE/Schofield to help nail everything down.
Colin Smale (2023-06-04 15:24:39+00:00): Hi,
Could you explain where you got your information from regarding the boundaries that you "clarified"? There doesn't seem to be have been any official process to change the boundaries. This article reflects the fact that the border crosses the station area: https://www.getreading.co.uk/news/property/plans-new-reading-station-building-16827876
Has something now changed officially?
By the way, I have a problem understanding what you mean here by "making the boundaries a bit clearer" - can you explain what you were intending?
Thanks!
A Trainspotter from Berkshire (2023-06-04 15:35:53+00:00): The infomation I used was from Wokingham Borough Coucil and they said in a few of there planning documents that it was fully in Wokingham Borough and Kirtons Farm Road is fully in Wokingham. Also used a bit of local knowledge.
Colin Smale (2023-06-04 16:31:22+00:00): If you don't mind I will revert the boundary changes as nothing has officially been changed - it would actually need an act of parliament to do that in this case!
A Trainspotter from Berkshire (2023-06-04 16:41:27+00:00): It has always been the way I put it according to Wokingham Borough councils own documents. The carpark is in Reading but according to the Wokingham Borough council the station building and platforms are in there area. All you would be doing by reverting it would be putting it back it to wrong state. https://www.wokingham.gov.uk/planning-policy/planning-policy-information/local-plan-and-planning-policies/
Colin Smale (2023-06-04 17:06:42+00:00): Thanks for the link to WBC. However this seems to corroborate my viewpoint. The new station is not shown as the base map is too old. For orientation, check out how far north the top of the "triangle" is, relative to the lake to the east of Flagstaff Road.
https://www.planvu.co.uk/wbc/map.php?map=proposals&data=bWFwZXg9NDY5MDgyLDE2OTk4OSw0NzAwMjUsMTcwMzg4Jnpvb209NiZhbm5vdGF0aW9ucz0mYW5ub0xhYmVscz0=&layers=all
Do you have an example of your viewpoint?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-04 14:50:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10951662270

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
RamDar (2023-06-08 16:49:35+00:00): Cześć. Mieszkam w Tyliczu i adres który mam na myśli przypisany jest do ul. Wolności. Co prawda w tym miejscu nie ma jeszcze budynku, ale numer juz jest nadany. Urząd Miasta specjalnie zabezpiecza się wiekszym numerem. Choć oni nie panują nad porządkiem. Niestety.
NorthCrab (2023-06-08 19:10:50+00:00): Hej, chodziło tutaj o błąd w pisowni "Wolnosci" ale widzę że już poprawiłeś :-) Dzięki za kontrybucję!
❤️‍🔥 (2023-06-05 00:30:52+00:00): hi, based on aerial imagery this doesn't look like a residential road...  
i also don't see a tunnel here?  https://osm.org/way/1178777216 it looks like a river crossing/ford
jpennycook (2023-06-05 06:06:50+00:00): Hi!
The road name sign at the corner with Queen's Avenue has an apostrophe in West Hope Grant's Road, so I've added it back in so the name matches the sign.

Jon
❤️‍🔥 (2023-06-05 00:29:06+00:00): hi, individual trees should be mapped as a point, not as a circle. Also, based on aerial imagery it looks like all these trees you added in this area have been chopped down: https://osm.org/edit#map=18/-43.34585/171.58472
user_5359 (2023-06-06 05:33:40+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on your three relations. You use the tag unknown tag osmc:colour (or osmc:colur). Did you mean osmc:symbol? Please check also the possible error in the value (osmc:symbol use only : for the separation of values)
ivanatora (2023-06-06 05:39:19+00:00): Thank you very much for the comment. 
I had some sort of a brain fart doing these from memory :)
Frans S (2023-06-10 09:57:08+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-06-05 15:17:15+00:00): Hi, you've created some duplicates
Zverik (2023-06-05 19:25:59+00:00): I don't think these are duplicates. There are indeed 3 parking spaces and 1 bicycle rental.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-06-05 19:35:41+00:00): There are currently two bicycle rentals in osm data
Zverik (2023-06-06 06:09:59+00:00): Huh, weird. Thanks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-04 15:57:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136937827 where the changeset comment is: See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-edits-in-italy/97706/59
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-04 15:57:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136937827 where the changeset comment is: See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-edits-in-italy/97706/59
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-04 15:57:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136937827 where the changeset comment is: See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-edits-in-italy/97706/59
Warin61 (2023-06-14 06:56:48+00:00): There are now some 5 relatons with errors in this area... 
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.03058&lat=-39.85133&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways