piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-03-31 02:19:22+00:00): Hi ducnc, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 barrier(s)
- 33 building(s)
- 16 highway(s)
- 5 leisure(s)
- 5 name(s)
- 4 natural(s)
- 1 sport(s)
- 2 tourism(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180652909
ducnc (2026-03-31 05:40:09+00:00): I confirm my intention to edit this.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-31 05:45:08+00:00): Thanks for your reply @ducnc

Looks legit.
FajrAl (2026-04-08 01:01:06+00:00): Mohon untuk tidak menambahkan tag is_in=* di tiap fitur. Tag tersebut sudah usang/tidak digunakan lagi dalam OSM.
NeisBot (2026-03-31 03:06:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13692254057 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Corian temple manufacturer"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-08 04:33:05+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/181022844
Wildsharky (2026-04-03 06:07:52+00:00):  Reverted in changeset id:180759942
NeisBot (2026-03-31 03:39:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13692254057 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Corian temple manufacturer"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-08 04:33:08+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/181022844
Samokat (2026-03-31 03:41:11+00:00): source: gps - Указал по ошибке
NeisBot (2026-03-31 04:03:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13694379647 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Air Conditioning Shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-08 04:33:12+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181029033
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
ZinaidaZ (2026-05-19 08:17:43+00:00): Добрый день! Не открыли еще переправы?
Wildsharky (2026-04-01 12:52:09+00:00): Revert of 180647838
NeisBot (2026-03-31 04:24:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13694394879 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Wealth management office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-08 04:33:17+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181029035
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-31 06:01:30+00:00): Guten Morgen,

wieder einmal werden mehrere name:*=* Tags gelöscht. Was für Quellen wurden verwendet? Die Argumentation des Changeset Kommentars ist zumindest für mich nicht nachvollziehbar. Und Letzteres gilt nicht nur für dieses Changeset des Beitragenden ...

Danke.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-31 06:02:29+00:00): Komplette Liste der unbeantworteten Fragen: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=1417746
user_1417746 (2026-04-01 17:45:54+00:00): Was ist daran nicht nachvollziehbar?
Zumindest einmal ein Anfang zur Diskussion?
Wiederholungen sollen nicht gelistet werden. Offizielle Sprache ist deutsch bzw. In anderen Teilen Sachsens zusätzlich sorbisch. Die gelöschten „Name“ sind dem deutschen entsprechend, somit Wiederholung. Datenmüll. Ein Grieche würde zu deutschen „Name“ Nein sagen, selbst wenn es lateinische Schrift ist, weil sie das selbe sind.
user_1417746 (2026-04-01 17:55:31+00:00): Example: Englisch:deutsch
munich different from München
Berlin not different from Berlin.
Cologne different from Köln.
user_1417746 (2026-04-01 18:03:34+00:00): Kiew ([ˈkiːɛf]; ukrainisch ⓘ/? Kyjiw[1] [ˈkɪjɪu̯]; russisch ⓘ/? Kijew [ˈkʲi(ɪ̯)ɪf]; jiddisch קיעוו Kiew = all the same = Duplikation
user_1417746 (2026-04-01 19:03:19+00:00): oder auch wenn der Amerikaner eher börlin, statt Berlin sagt, reicht das nicht. Eine englischsprachige Schreibweise wie "Berleen" existiert nicht; die offizielle Schreibweise wird auch im Englischen genutzt.

generell gilt: Städte sind Eigennamen und meist hat man sie so übernommen, um Verwechslungen zu vermeiden. das wäre dann das Beispiel bei Freiburg mit all seinen lateinischen formen, die aber so keiner in Italien heutzutage sagt. Oder kannst du mir jemanden als Quelle nennen?
user_1417746 (2026-04-01 19:06:43+00:00): die große Diskussion vor etwa 15 jahren endete damit: openstreetmap ist kein Übersetzungstool, sondern eine (internationale) karte. wenn jemand eine Übersetzung machen möchte, dann außerhalb.
user_1417746 (2026-04-01 19:27:15+00:00): oder wenn der Sachse eher "Nu Jork" statt "New York" sagt, soll es nicht so aufgenommen werden, weil es ein Eigenname ist.
user_1417746 (2026-04-02 04:23:57+00:00): ... auch wenn / weil ein Amerikaner es als "New York" versteht.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-03 08:54:22+00:00): Guten Morgen,

danke für die zahlreichen Antworten hier und per PM. Ich habe auf Basis dessen mir erlaubt einen Beitrag im OSM Community Forum zu erstellen: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ubersetzungen-in-name-und-name-xx-tags/142812

Danke und Grüße
user_1417746 (2026-04-05 08:04:25+00:00): nachtrag zur ukrainischen Hautstadt: Die offizielle deutsche Schreibweise für die ukrainische Hauptstadt ist seit Anfang 2024 Kyjiw (anstelle des russisch basierten „Kiew“). Diese Änderung durch das Auswärtige Amt soll der ukrainischen Bezeichnung (Київ) gerecht werden. Auch im Duden ist mittlerweile die Schreibweise Kyjiw als korrekte Bezeichnung festgelegt.
Wildsharky (2026-04-03 06:08:42+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180761596
tastrax (2026-03-31 06:15:46+00:00): East of Gordon Street is A9 according to LIST and west is the A3. Is this just based on the signage just pointing the way to the A3 at the Arthur highway roundabout?
5m4u9 (2026-04-01 00:11:40+00:00): hmmm... estas vias de enlace que cambiaste no pueden ser primarias (anaranjadas), por su importancia las laterales son más concurridas.
Ismael David Angulo (2026-04-01 16:57:42+00:00): Hola Marco, si son concurridas, pero hay que tomar en cuenta que las vias del puente son igual de concurridas debido a que, es la unica alternativa de ir de sud a norte por la avenida independencia, podriamos evaluar tenerlas en cuenta como primarias por la importancia de la avenida?
5m4u9 (2026-04-01 18:38:38+00:00): Hola gracias por responder.

En OSM para Bolivia la importancia de las vias está dada por tres razones en orden consecutivo exclutente: a) declaración oficial de la ABC/gobernación/alcaldía b) la conectividad de la via y c) la infraestructura (carriles y velocidad).

a) la alcaldía no considera a la independencia una via importante
b) la independecia solo conecta las dos vias importantes: petrolera y panamericana
c) la independencia tiene 2 carriles y es avenida, al igual que las otras.

Respecto a si son concurridas, veamos la cantidad de líneas que pasan por las tres:
a) independecia -> 7
b) barrientos -> 15
c) panamericana -> 29

En las siguientes semanas, aplicaré un cambio en la jerarquía de vias de Cochabamba, ya que encontré la normativa de la alcaldía de jerarquías, y las ajusté a OSM Bolivia y salió este mapa -> https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/red-vial-cochabamba_828920

Aún me falta ajustar algunas cosas la conectividad, revisar las calles y avenidas y si son concurridas y evaluar las que son. Y sobre todo averiguar que avenida la mayoria de autos usa para pasar de la blanco galindo (quillacollo) a la eliodoro villazón (sacaba)... la heroínas o la urquidi-ramon rivero-23 de marzo (lado derecho del río rocha)....

Espero terminar a mediados de mes porque la actual jerarquia es un carnaval, porque lo modificaron extranjeros de Kaart solo fijandose en la infraestructura :(
felipeeugenio (2026-03-31 12:24:23+00:00): Hello. That is not a residential street. It is clearly a driveway.

regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180655523
NeisBot (2026-03-31 05:27:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13694486841 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Used car dealership"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-08 10:33:07+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181041549
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
5m4u9 (2026-03-31 23:56:59+00:00): hola, esta calle moises monroy es de sentido este-> oeste como se ve en la flecha hacia el oeste -> https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-17.39116&lng=-66.18360669999998&z=19.242350645232293&dateFrom=2024-01-01&pKey=830108252996241&focus=photo 

de todas formas iré a revisar ese lugar, porque creo que el transporte publico va por la 23 de marzo y no por esta calle.
Ismael David Angulo (2026-04-01 16:45:08+00:00): Hola Marco, si de hecho hay un par de calles que el transporte publico usa para circular, tambien lo revise en google maps para validar el sentido de la calle
5m4u9 (2026-04-01 17:14:05+00:00): Bueno, hay dos posiciones en estos casos. En OSM tiene más prioridad lo que está señalado en el cartel, porque representa a "la mayoría".

Para el caso del transporte púbico (20% de vehículos en cbba) hay una etiqueta exclusiva que obvia el sentido único... oneway:bus=no

Yo casi estoy seguro de que el sentido de la calle pusieron luego de que exista la línea de bus. Pero luego no les notificaron, ahora con este alcalde si les notifican al transporte público y obedecen la nueva ruta. De todas formas es peligroso su ruta porque en los semáforos van en contra sentido.

En fin, la etiqueta "oneway:bus=no" cumple para el transporte público y para la app, pero para todo el resto que representa el 80% de los autos queda la señal de tránsito.
NeisBot (2026-03-31 05:54:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1494510592 v1 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1494510599 v1 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1952188865 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180656236
NeisReview (2026-04-08 10:33:32+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180660832
Udarian (2026-03-31 16:26:22+00:00): on the latest aerial imagery available in iD this ALPR is still in the middle of the road area which makes its position highly unlikely, so please double check its position and updated it to be correct.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
Udarian (2026-03-31 16:25:36+00:00): on the latest aerial imagery available in iD this ALPR is in the middle of the road area which makes its position highly unlikely, so please double check its position and updated it to be correct.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
eggie (2026-03-31 10:37:44+00:00): Feedback...
Dag Remco. Lijkt me correct zo.
Gr eggie
iandees (2026-03-31 08:04:39+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6166138860 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180660200, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-03-31 06:48:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/7063767283 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Estación de carga eléctrica"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Estación de carga eléctrica"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-08 10:33:10+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/181009618
Piskvor (2026-03-31 08:27:47+00:00): partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180660952#map=18/50.082311/14.400221

funicular under construction, verified OTG
ljc_jlyb (2026-04-02 16:35:47+00:00): 회전제약 수십개 대신 도로 복선화 추천드립니다
ljc_jlyb (2026-04-02 16:41:03+00:00): 도로에 중앙분리대가 있는 경우 반드시 복선화 해야합니다
gebux (2026-03-31 14:53:52+00:00): Why did you delete the tracks and paths in Leale Valley? All are still there and in use.
NeisBot (2026-03-31 07:03:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1494519548 v1 | 11 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180658159
NeisRevert (2026-03-31 08:07:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/180660300
where the comment is: "Remove test edits"
NeisBot (2026-03-31 07:06:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/7063767283 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Estación de Carga"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Estación de Carga"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-08 10:33:13+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/181009618
NeisBot (2026-03-31 07:15:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1494521350 v1 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1494521351 v1 | 4 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180658496
NeisRevert (2026-03-31 08:07:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/180660288
where the comment is: "Remove test edits"
Dawid2849 (2026-04-20 11:44:45+00:00): A co z przejazdami kolejowymi, dalej istnieją?
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-01 09:51:43+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180659099
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-01 09:52:00+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180705270
9_tab (2026-04-01 22:22:13+00:00): addr:country should be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:addr:country=BR
iandees (2026-03-31 08:04:50+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1621728031 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180660206, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
eggie (2026-03-31 10:35:32+00:00): review_requested 	yes

Dag Donux.. Lijkt me correct.

MVG
eggie
Taya_S (2026-03-31 08:32:55+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180661198 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180661201

Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20081
eggie (2026-03-31 10:25:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
stasiu512 (2026-03-31 15:03:38+00:00): Cześć, jakiś czas temu a dokładniej w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177884983 ustawiałem tutaj maxspeed zgodnie z oznakowaniem w terenie. Czy oznakowanie się zmieniło?
stasiu512 (2026-03-31 15:19:37+00:00): Też brakuje tutaj chyba znaków obszaru zabudowanego, jadać z Borkowa ul Akacjową/Ofiar 10 Kwietnia  chyba nie mijamy znaków kończących obszar zabudowany takie jak są na DW222 Przy granicach administracyjnych Gdańska i Straszyna
Marek-M (2026-03-31 15:30:44+00:00): No właśnie coś mi tam cały czas nie gra z tymi znakami, szczególnie w kierunku Straszyna. Często jeżdżę tam samochodem i staram się zapamiętać, gdzie te znaki stoją. Niestety chyba pamięć mi szwankuje przy tylu znakach i chyba muszę wybrać się tam rowerem aby na spokojnie temat ogarnąć.
Marek-M (2026-04-01 07:39:59+00:00): Hej, dzisiaj kolejna korekta z obszarem zabudowanym pomiędzy rondami https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1214798269

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180705555

Jeszcze muszę zweryfikować istnienie ograniczenia do 60kmph tutaj https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/849533316 w kierunku Straszyna.

Tego ograniczenia do 60kmph w kierunku Straszyna na pewno nie ma (i przez to ograniczenie zacząłem weryfikować te limity prędkości):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/849533313
stasiu512 (2026-04-01 19:28:37+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za weryfikacje w terenie:) Z tego co widzę to znaki obszaru zabudowanego się nie zmieniły. Co do ograniczenia do 60 km/h w stronę Straszyna tutaj - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/849533316 na pewno ono było więc trzeba zweryfikować czy jest dalej. Co do tej linii - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/849533313 w stronę Straszyna to jeśli twierdzisz że na pewno nie ma to tego wcześniejszego też nie ma. Dałem tu 60 km/h na tym odcinku - https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=54.28874%2C18.59745%3B54.285421%2C18.597252#map=17/54.287080/18.597354 ze względu iż ul. Chabrowa była oznakowana jako droga wewnętrzna więc nie jest to skrzyżowanie czyli ograniczenie prędkości zostaje dalej takie jakie było. Za to w stronę Gdańska był znak odwołania ograniczenia do 60 km/h zaraz za skrętem w ul. Chabrową właśnie ze względu na brak skrzyżowania. Pozostaje kwestia tego odcinka w stronę Straszyna - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159666667#map=19/54.290885/18.597751. Wcześniej na pewno nie było tutaj ograniczenia za skrzyżowaniem z al. Ofiar 10 Kwietnia więc ograniczenie do 50 km/h (znak przed skrzyżowaniem) zmieniało się w ogólne ograniczenie do 90 km/h.
Marek-M (2026-04-03 08:16:36+00:00): Cześć, mam dzisiejsze Mapillary z przejazdu tą trasą w kierunku Straszyna: https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/marek_m?lat=54.29185560000002&lng=18.598395199999914&z=18.342444299848918&pKey=2157443108350638&focus=photo

Aktualnie za skrzyżowaniem z Aleją Ofiar 10 Kwietnia stoi znak 60km/h i do obszaru zabudowanego Straszyna nic więcej tam nie ma z ograniczeniem prędkości. Wg mnie drogi serwisowe za wiaduktem tworzą skrzyżowanie ze Starogardzką, dlatego też od tego fragmentu dałem https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/849533316 ograniczenie prędkości w terenie niezabudowanym. Może będziesz miał inne zdanie?
Marek-M (2026-04-03 08:18:05+00:00): PS: Na Mapillary kierunek robienia zdjęć jest dziwnie obrócony, kamera była ustawiona na wprost w kierunku Straszyna :)
stasiu512 (2026-04-08 12:38:27+00:00): Cześć, wybacz za późną odpowiedź byłem trochę na urlopie;) Super robota z tym mapillary. Znaków informujących o tym, iż jest to droga wewnętrzna nie widzę, więc wychodzi na to, że jest to połączenie dróg czyli skrzyżowanie. Dzięki za korekty i pozdrawiam.
iandees (2026-03-31 08:43:11+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6279956248 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180661684, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Kovoschiz (2026-03-31 08:29:52+00:00): 0. Please use descriptive upload comment
1. Please don't delete then redraw the same feature. Move them. 
2. Please don't remove details
Kovoschiz (2026-03-31 08:35:04+00:00): 3. There's no need to blindly align exactly to some imagery at some version. There will be offsets. Eg it matches old Esri Clarity.
LordGarySugar (2026-04-22 22:33:58+00:00): Hi, I've removed this abandoned railway as it no longer has any trace remaining. Please only map railways as abandoned if they have some visible track or sleepers along their route. Features in OSM need to be verifiable on the ground. If you'd like to record abandoned railways, OpenHistoricalMap is the perfect place to do that.