piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2025-09-26 18:25:01+00:00): Hoi... met StreetComplete gaat niet zoveel fout.
Heb je nog  een ander account?.. want ik kan dat van die rijstroken niet vinden.

Mapse..
eggie
GerdP (2025-09-26 07:27:30+00:00): Moin!
Habe gerade bemerkt, dass Du hier https://www.osm.org/way/1315688014
cycleway:both=no entfernt hast. Hoffentlich nur ein Versehen?
GerdP (2025-09-26 08:26:17+00:00): Hab's zurückgeholt: https://www.osm.org/changeset/172473096
WoSoe (2025-09-26 04:10:23+00:00): Moin,

mit dem Baum in der Mitte, kann es laut Wiki eigentlich kein »turning_circle« sein.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Circular_and_widened_road_features

»turning_loop« wäre eine Alternative.

Allerdings ob ein Punkt gleichzeitig Wendeschleife und Baum sein kann?

Gruß
WoSoe
gsperb (2025-09-26 08:58:55+00:00): Mathematisch kann ein Punkt ohnehin kein Kreis sein, sondern er bezeichnet - in diesem Fall - nur den Mittelpunkt eines Kreises. Weshalb also sollte dort kein Baum stehen dürfen.
Ansonsten Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe es "geloopt"
gerd
DD1GJ (2025-09-28 06:55:38+00:00): revert 172456568 172456467 172435444 172433443, seltsame "Änderungen zu Validierungszwecken" zurückgesetzt
DD1GJ (2025-09-26 06:23:34+00:00): Was möchtest Du validieren? Durch Deine Änderungen sind jetzt viele Inkonsistenzen und Fehler in der Datenbank.
DD1GJ (2025-09-28 06:53:59+00:00): revert 172456568 172456467 172435444 172433443, seltsame "Änderungen zu Validierungszwecken" zurückgesetzt
eggie (2025-09-25 21:11:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-09-29 10:41:41+00:00): Moin!
Ist es richtig, dass all diese Waldwege nur für landwirtschaftlichen Verkehr freigeben sind, aber nicht für die Forstwirtschaft? Das wäre schon sehr seltsam.
Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
SammysHP (2025-09-29 11:41:50+00:00): Das ist natürlich nicht korrekt. Die Beschilderung ist "Land- und forstwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei", dementsprechend müsste man noch "forestry" ergänzen. Leider werfe ich das immer wieder in einen Topf... Kann ich später noch ergänzen.
SammysHP (2025-09-29 19:10:13+00:00): Siehe auch Nachfrage in CS 172508773.
mueschel (2025-09-30 08:30:18+00:00): Bitte schau nach diesem Knoten, da ist etwas schiefgegangen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5659163540
osm915 (2025-09-30 18:40:13+00:00): Ups, da hat schon wieder die Autokorrektur auf dem mobilen Endgerät zugeschlagen :-(
Ich wollte den POI nur mit einem "dedup:" prefix "deaktivieren", um dann in Ruhe am PC nachsehen zu können, welche der beiden Tourist-Info-Nodes älter ist ... 
Ich lösche den Node dann gleich.
mavl (2025-09-26 01:34:52+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет непрямоугольное здание. При этом на спутниковом снимке Esri показано четыре здания.
geo_ozon (2025-09-26 13:14:20+00:00): Исправлено
eggie (2025-09-25 21:14:00+00:00): Dag tijst..

Dit is niet correct. Er zijn al adresnodes. Svp geen adresgegevens aan gebouwomtrekken toevoegen.

MVG
eggie
tijst (2025-09-26 06:08:56+00:00): Ah excuus, ik zie dat je ze al hebt teruggedraaid. Dank. Groet, Tijs
eggie (2025-09-26 07:01:42+00:00): No problem...  :)
Mapse
eggie
immutability (2025-10-06 08:29:29+00:00): Ahoj, tú dočasnú preložku cesty I/18 v MÚK Hubová, ktorá je teraz opäť označená ako "vo výstavbe" je možné už zmazať, už ju rozoberajú aj s násypom a mala slúžiť len 3 mesiace počas rekonštrukcie starého telesa I/18.
Kris74M (2025-10-09 04:15:58+00:00): Witaj.
Co to za proposed?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1433126408#map=18/50.990992/18.223213&layers=N
Brak źródła dnych naniesionych na mapę.
Fasha4 (2025-10-09 10:36:53+00:00): Są to drogi w planowanym Obwodzie Utrzymania Dróg (OUD), który ma być zbudowany w ramach budowy S11.
Źródłem są plany sytuacyjne z koncepcji programowej tej inwestycji. Zrektyfikowana mapa jest dostępna tutaj: https://mapwarper.net/layers/2329 (częściwo można to odczytać z changeseta)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-14 06:21:48+00:00): Hello, can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5005135 ?
pwbriggs (2025-09-25 23:09:46+00:00): Thanks! If the trail is still there, though, it probably should be replaced with a disused:highway=path or abandoned:highway=path tag instead. That way, OpenStreetMap will be true to what is on the ground (one of the policies), while also not displaying the trail in most renderers. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F for further reading if you're interested.

Thanks again for your contribution, and please let me know if you have any questions!
pwbriggs (2025-09-25 23:10:29+00:00): I updated this trail to abandoned:highway=path.
custodiankeyy (2025-09-26 18:49:29+00:00): Eklemiş olduğunuz "distance_km" etiketi ne işe yarıyor? Taginfo'ya göre sadece sizin kullandığınız gözüküyor.
HakaNNN58 (2025-09-26 19:46:20+00:00): Herhangi bir bilgim yok, daha önceden kullanılmış olabilir. Tam olarak nerede kullanmışım? Lütfen açıklayınız.
custodiankeyy (2025-09-26 20:16:35+00:00): Kusura bakmayın, hareket ettirdiğiniz noktalardan birinde vardı. Siz kullanmamışsınız.

Kullanılan değişiklik seti:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137186718
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1181034372/history/1
Sylabowy Kot (2025-09-25 21:00:01+00:00): Źródło danych o obelisku: https://www.sop.gov.pl/pl/aktualnosci/869,Uroczysta-zbiorka-z-okazji-Swieta-Sluzby-Ochrony-Panstwa.html

Niezmikromapowany teren jest ocenzurowany na prawie że wszystkich ortofotomapach, ale dało się doczytać, że to wszystko nie jest pojedynczym obszarem.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-09-28 21:32:15+00:00): Tagi ref z ocenzurowanego obszaru, jak i źródło tagu historis=yes wziąłem z Gminnej Ewidencji Zabytków.
iandees (2025-09-25 22:31:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for improving the map. Keep up the great work.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172459267
VLD319 (2025-09-25 21:34:20+00:00): Description should say: Added marked zebra crossing tags to crossing way
lumixen (2025-09-26 21:21:58+00:00): Як тільки відправиш мені нотаріально завірене право власності цими ділянками на ім'я пана Кирила - обовʼязково попущусь.
Дуже раджу більше мені не погрожувати персонально і всі проблеми на цьому сервісі вирішувати в межах правил сервісу. Твоє хамство, невміння спілкуватись та повна неповага до правил елементарного етикету взаємодії між людьми коли щось не влаштовує - одна справа, яке так само в межах сервісу модерує DWG. І DWG, до речі, свій вердикт винесло. Але от персональні погрози "on the ground" - зовсім інша справа. Просто нагадаю, що персональні погрози щонайменше підпадають під КУпАП та/або ККУ.
Якщо раптом є бажання цивільно пояснити чому ти вважаєш що в тебе є якісь спеціальні права, яких немає в інших, на модерацію цієї частини мапи - велкам, я завжди відкритий до культурної розмови, без предʼяв у стилі "я тут главній". А погрози залиш при собі.
custodiankeyy (2025-09-26 18:44:46+00:00): Oranın adı "Private Property" mi? Ayrıca isim eklerken Türkçe halini kullanın. İngilizce kısmı için name:en etiketini kullanabilirsiniz.
Glassman (2025-09-25 22:59:43+00:00): It appears you dragged a node which as been fixed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172460835
eggie (2025-09-27 16:14:32+00:00): Hoi,

Wandelroute 79-78 en fietsknooppuntroute 48-90 heb ik 'tijdelijk' omgelegd. 
Dit zal wel eens lang kunnen duren.
Schoolgebouwen verwijderd.
Pr Bernhard verplaatst naar voormalige Pius X school. 
Groet,
eggie
felipeeugenio (2025-09-26 15:01:44+00:00): Hola Nicolás.
Por favor hacer ediciones focalizadas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172461946
Supaplex (2025-09-26 06:19:20+00:00): 你確定這棟建築為300公尺嗎？
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1433181808
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172462950
felipeeugenio (2025-09-26 14:52:56+00:00): Hola. No hacemos dibujos esquemáticos. Los edificios estaban bien dibujados.

Edición fue reversada.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172462995
user_5359 (2025-09-26 06:31:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add an ALPR as node near by a street not on the street. I must revert your entry.
user_5359 (2025-09-26 06:27:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
Short hint for the value of the key service_times. Is the service held every day or only on Sundays? In the latter case, you forgot the day abbreviation Su.
By the way, we write the time in 24-hour notation and do not abbreviate minutes.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-09-27 12:23:41+00:00): This changeset was fully reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172523795 because there currently no evidence support that Vietnam had controlled Sansha City
streckenkundler (2025-09-26 14:19:31+00:00): Bist du dir 100%ig sicher, daß deine Änderungen korrekt sind? Bist du dir 100%ig sicher, daß für dieses Gebiet die nun gesetzte offizielle Nummer korrekt ist? Mit Sicherheit kannst du das nicht! Warum? Alle (!) Schutzgebiete hier un Brandenburg haben zwei Nummern. Hier für dieses Gebiet ist es ISN=1573 und Gebiets-ID=4549-502. Vergleichbar gilt es für Naturparke, Biosphärenreservate, dem Nationalpark und den LSG's. Es it bisher nicht geklärt, welche dieser beiden Nummern ins ref:* gehört (vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area )

Ich bin etwas verärgert, daß du, anstatt zu fragen, rasenmäherartig dein eigens Ding machst! :(

knatschige Grüße,

streckenkundler
Tobias Conradi (2025-09-26 14:48:29+00:00): 1) Quellen für "die nun gesetzte offizielle Nummer" 1573:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17973827/history/1 (du selbst)

https://forst.brandenburg.de/sixcms/media.php/9/bafe.pdf

2) "Alle (!) Schutzgebiete hier un Brandenburg haben zwei Nummern. " und "nicht geklärt, welche dieser beiden Nummern ins ref:* gehört  (vgl. osm.wiki/DE:Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area )" 

Dort sind keine Ausführungen zu Brandenburg enthalten.
Tobias Conradi (2025-09-26 15:01:10+00:00): 3) "dein eigens Ding machst!" - den Key "ref:lfu" gibt es laut https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2cuT nur in Brandenburg und 1x in Bayern

In Brandenburg wurde der Tag mit diesem Key in jedem Fall, dessen Historie ich ansah, von Dir gesetzt.
streckenkundler (2025-09-26 16:07:08+00:00): Was ich nicht verstehe... WARUM? Warum fragst du nicht vorher, was ich mit ref:lfu=* bezwecken wollte?
Alles weitere im Forum!
Quimby5 (2026-06-26 15:54:31+00:00): Hi, please be aware that in this change you removed the highway=track tag, which only left railway=abandoned tag, therefore it disappeared from the map.   Both tags are correct, highway=track is correct for current conditions. I have corrected this with changeset 184652693
Kootenehs (2026-06-30 17:54:52+00:00): Good catch.  I believe it was marked as a road which I updated to show the historical railroad it had been but didn't catch that doing so I lost the highway tag.  Corrected other abandoned rail sections that are still open to vehicle traffic
Quimby5 (2026-06-30 19:00:57+00:00): Awesome, thanks!
aharvey (2025-11-12 02:34:27+00:00): are you sure about that? It was only just changed to construction back in May and the new temporary onramp added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423785982/history.

Are you sure these are more recent changes than those made a years ago?

Also https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106729756 connects to the tunnel, which is still marked as underconstruction so you've just opened the onramp leading into a dead-end once you reach the tunnel. I think you might be mistaken?
citrula (2025-09-26 08:22:07+00:00): welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. natural=grassland is for naturally occurring grasslands - for maintained lawns like this consider using surface=grass

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=grassland

Also, please don't draw a lot of tiny areas like this - it should be one object for each section of grass.
user_5359 (2025-09-27 10:01:26+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2cxo. What is the mean of the tag MWShapeID = 9 ?
NeisBot (2025-09-26 05:00:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-29 11:27:27+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172519529
felipeeugenio (2025-09-26 11:38:47+00:00): Hello.
I hope everything is ok.

To get to know the category of the roads that link different types of roads, we try to follow this guide: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Link_roads_between_different_highways_types.

Those were good as services.

regards
ArcticDesert (2025-09-29 08:22:32+00:00): That makes sense. I will keep that in mind regarding Strava moving forward. Thanks for your input here!
ArcticDesert (2025-09-29 16:15:08+00:00): Thanks for reaching out. Please disregard the last comment, as it was intended for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172322350. After reviewing the documentation provided, I agree that service is the more appropriate classification here and will restore them as such. Have a nice day!
Sylabowy Kot (2025-09-30 21:21:58+00:00): Jak? Po co? Wszystko było prawidłowo. Ty je popsułeś. W jednym miejscu wręcz przykleiłeś węzeł do innego budynku: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9053982607 Najgorsze są te dziwne kąty.
Polecam zerkać na wartwę Geoportal 2: Ewidencja budynków WMS. Jeśli chcemy odwzorować dachy itp. to trochę inaczej się za to zabieramy. To jest normalne, że ortofotomapy pokazują budynki inaczej. Używamy wszelkich narzędzi, które mogą nam wskazywać podstawę budynku. Nie mapuje się po kształcie dachu i obrysu podstawy z rzutu izometrycznego.

Wycofałem zestaw zmian: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172679851
NeisBot (2025-09-26 05:27:39+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

Your changeset was commented because it appears to follow a pattern that could be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related.

Could you kindly confirm if your map edits were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #URLs
Taya_S (2025-09-26 05:31:35+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172467425
NeisBot (2025-09-26 05:27:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-29 11:26:01+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172468954
LordGarySugar (2025-10-13 01:18:49+00:00): Please, what is the meaning of these dense grids of footways and service roads? For example, here, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1334960642 the ways you have added bear no resemblance to reality. It seems like you are adding these ways for some kind of project? If so, you still need to follow standard mapping guidelines, other people use this data too.
NeisBot (2025-09-26 05:36:39+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

Your changeset was commented because it appears to follow a pattern that could be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related.

Could you kindly confirm if your map edits were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #URLs
Taya_S (2025-09-26 05:38:59+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172467625
Patchanka (2025-09-30 16:35:33+00:00): bonjour
merci pour l'ajout de l'auberge. Vous avez indiqué juste un nom "Auberge de Saint Julien" mais sans préciser de quoi il s'agit ? Un resto ? Un hôtel ? autre ?
jjyach (2025-09-26 16:19:48+00:00): This is a public park and public parking.  Please revert this edit
World_Winner (2025-09-29 08:27:17+00:00): Hi Jjyach,

Thank you for your valuable feedback. I have made the edit because Cast Pebble Lane (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/921693076) is tagged as a private access road, suggesting the parking area would be private access as well. Changeset reverted to restore data to its previous state.
With your local knowledge, can you let me know if the private access tag on Cast Pebble Lane is incorrect and needs to get removed?
jjyach (2025-09-29 10:56:30+00:00): Correct those roads/driveways are all public now.  I believe they were marked private when construction of the neighborhood was on going but was never cleaned up afterward.  I can clean it up right now no problem.
World_Winner (2025-09-29 13:57:44+00:00): Hi Jjyach,

Thank you for the clarification. Have a good day.
Sakari_N (2025-09-26 07:50:51+00:00): Moi ja tervetuloa muokkaamaan openstreetmappia!

Huomasin että melkein kaikissa lisäämissäsi kohteissa HRK-konevuokraamot oli jo merkitty rakennukseen, ja nyt se on merkitty erillisellä karttapisteellä myös pihalle. 

Oletan että nämä ovat molemmat samoja toimintoja? Silloin näillä tulisi olla yksi yhteinen karttaobjekti, eli konevuokramon tagit tulisi laittaa rakennukseen, tai erilliseen pisteeseen mutta ei molempiin. Karttapisteen voi sijoittaa rakennuksen sisälle, jos toimipiste on jossain tietyssä rakennuksen osassa.

Muuten muokkaukset näyttivät oikein mallikkailta, ja kaikki tiedot näyttävät olevan oikeassa muodossa.
HRK-Konevuokraamot (2025-09-26 11:45:26+00:00): Kiitos kommenteista. Minulle tämä oli ehkä hiukan opettelua, kun en tiennyt miten yritysnimet pitää kartalta löytyä.  Joka tapauksessa hyvä, että sain lisättyä yrityksemme tiedot karttaan. Vaikuttaa ihan pätevältä systeemiltä nyt, kun olen päässyt "sinuiksi" applikaation kanssa.
JakubS (2025-09-27 05:39:41+00:00): Dodając informacje o obiektach historycznych powinieneś dodać odpowiednie tagi do istniejących budynków w bazie, a nie tworzyć ich duplikaty w tym samym miejscu. Poza tym opisy typu "Dworzec kolejowy z 1908 roku" powinno się dawać do tagu description, a nie name.
Patchi (2025-09-27 06:51:32+00:00): Hello kräckel,

I don't see the use of your modification of the bus stop PEM Gare Routière https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6198732688. You move this point more than one kilometer to the north west (this bus stop used to be here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6198732688/history/4#map=19/44.047832/5.044962 and is for sure still there). May be an incorrect manipulation?

Best regards,

Patchi.
kräckel (2025-09-27 10:02:05+00:00): Hello Patchi,
these changes were made unintentionally, possibly due to a system error. Thank you for your attention. This can, of course, be corrected. 
Sincerely, Kräckel
osmviborg (2025-09-26 07:01:54+00:00): Har du overvejet at gøre brug af de midlertidige forårsbilleder?
osmviborg (2025-09-26 07:55:15+00:00): copy paste: https://api.dataforsyningen.dk/wms/orto_foraar_temp?token=52065b2ec5fda5a46a50b451f3f24473&FORMAT=image/jpeg&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&VERSION=1.3.0&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=quickorto,quickorto_10cm,orto_foraar_temp,orto_foraar_temp_10cm&STYLES=&CRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}&BBOX={bbox}
Ernst Poulsen (2025-09-26 08:38:48+00:00): Det ved jeg ikke hvordan jeg gør. Hvilke fordele er der ved at bruge dem i det her område?
osmviborg (2025-09-26 08:44:28+00:00): De billeder du bruger nu er 1 &1/2 år gamle. I ID tryk 'B' indsæt linken i 'Brugerdefineret', så burde du få de midlertidige forårsbilleder.
trial (2025-10-22 07:22:21+00:00): Bonjour,
Supprimer le numéro générique c'est bien.
Le remplacer par le numéro local, c'est mieux : 
+33 2 98 17 11 00
mike140 (2025-09-26 08:04:55+00:00): Не займайтеся дурницями. Видалив
zstadler (2025-09-26 20:16:29+00:00): Hello gwchar2,

Welcome to OSM and thank you for mapping the Tel Aviv parking zones!

Please note that there is mapping of parking zones for streets is supposed to be done with the
"parking:<side>:zone" tag, where <side> is "left", "right", or "both" rather that the undefined "parking_zone" tag.

Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking#Residential_parking_permits,_parking_zones

All the best,
zstadler
gwchar2 (2025-09-27 10:38:51+00:00): Thank you for the reference, the rest of the zones will be done as you stated.
For some reason I did not notice this at the bottom of the parking page here
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Parking#How_to_map

thank you very much!
NeisBot (2025-09-26 07:51:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-29 11:22:02+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172518554
eggie (2025-09-26 08:07:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Wanneer je er mag fietsen zal het geen highway=footway zijn (G7 bord), maar een highway=path

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-26 08:11:04+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533781746

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-09-26 08:09:58+00:00): harmtjoonk,
Alle begin is moeilijk, maar waarom access=permit?
Voor wie?
Het eerste stuk zal een highway=service zijn. Het zuidelijke stuk dan een highway=path

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-26 08:14:27+00:00): Wellicht bedoel je access=permissive
Dat routeert wel. Dus bedoeld voor Eigenterrein.
eggie (2025-09-26 09:03:26+00:00): motor_vehicle=designated zet het hele traject open voor autoverkeer.
Ik het het eeste stukje aangepast naar destination ipv designated.
Het noordelijke stuk is een toegangsweg. dus = service
Mapse
eggie
Sanniu (2025-09-28 08:25:49+00:00): Hi, is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1433242468 - roundabout?
moshikosh (2025-09-28 10:50:27+00:00): i assume, based on the traffic there
Sanniu (2025-09-28 11:21:17+00:00): ok, will fix the tagging
Thelone1986 (2025-09-27 12:47:45+00:00): Bonjour,

Pourquoi ce changement? Le sentier n'a pas changé et ce tracé passe presque à travers une maison qui n'est pas encore mappée
fredlenoir (2025-09-29 11:35:50+00:00): Bonjour, suite à une réunion avec la commune, J'ai à priori juste ajouté que le sentier avait une surface : grass; Ai je modifié autre chose ? Belle journée !
Thelone1986 (2025-09-30 12:51:10+00:00): Bonjour,

Le tracé suivait plus ou moins les deux fines "zones boisées" (qui, je pense, représentent les haies que le sentier longe séparant les habitations du reste), mais il a été redressé en même temps que votre changement de surface (qui est juste) et il passe maintenant à travers un champ et une habitation non mappée (j'imagine le 39 de l'avenue des Acacias).

Cette zone a besoin d'un rafraîchissement de toutes manières donc ça me dérangerait pas de corriger tout ça dès que j'ai un peu de temps libre
Hidden Mountain (2025-09-30 13:38:00+00:00): Вершина Турист уже есть на карте, не нужно создавать дубликаты!
Zjefken (2025-09-26 08:47:53+00:00): https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issue/2402e4c5-8ec8-eb1f-29b7-51e751d6b6c8
Zjefken (2025-09-26 08:51:47+00:00): https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issue/8038bcf1-8cf9-5452-9a29-ad062326e3ce
emvee (2025-09-27 07:27:02+00:00): Bedankt!
Peter Elderson (2025-09-27 15:14:01+00:00): Graag gedaan, maar ik heb het dus wel verkeerdom gedaan! Of zie jij het anders dan Allroads?