piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Zilvervisje (2026-05-09 08:28:56+00:00): Hallo, je hebt use_sidepath voor foot gebruikt op het fietspad waardoor je niet meer kunt navigeren te voet, omdat er geen los voetpad is ingetekend https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112311769 ook https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47593625 navigeert niet te voet.
kwiatek_123 (2022-12-21 18:51:17+00:00): Cześć,
Mam uwagi co do https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10278459035

Adres jest wpisany Kwatery Głównej 46B, ale jest ustawiony na 46A. Czy to na pewno poprawna lokalizacja?

Numer telefonu podajemy w lekko innym formacie. Zamiast myślników to spacje.

Nie wiem czy w nazwie POI jest sens wstawiać "Pracowania Tatuaży" skoro jest już tag, który to opisuje.
Ulrich Klose (2022-12-22 21:05:21+00:00): Dzięki za zwrócenie na to uwagi. Jutro chyba wybiorę się tam na spacerek (10 min ode mnie) i zweryfikuję gdzie dokładnie jest do tego miejsca wejście.

Co do zapisu numeru telefonu. Jestem w dodawaniu rzeczy do OSM nowy i z odrobiną wstydu przyznam się że zamiast przeczytać na wszelki wypadek artykuł na wiki o tagu phone, zasugerowałem się podpowiedzią w edytorze iD w którym jest opisany tylko format numerów z myślnikami między cyframi (przypuszczam, Amerykański?).

Spoko, jeśli uważasz to za dobrą praktykę, skrócę nazwę do "Kant".
kwiatek_123 (2022-12-22 21:09:22+00:00): Super, dzięki.

Co do nazwy to ustaw według swego uznania.
Langlaeufer (2022-12-21 18:09:32+00:00): Dann steht wahrscheinlich auch kein 100er Schild, oder? source:maxspeed=sign
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130341908
UTroe (2022-12-22 13:56:22+00:00): Das ist korrekt.
Langlaeufer (2022-12-22 14:28:51+00:00): Ich habe nun source:maxspeed und die Verkehrsschilder entfernt.

Der Weg ist noch auf 50?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/839404213
UTroe (2022-12-22 14:40:52+00:00): Auf 50 nicht. Ich glaube die letzten Meter wurden wieder auf 70 geändert. Da bin ich aber nicht ganz sicher. Kann ich gerne beim nächsten Mal (wird aber wohl erst nächstes Jahr sein) nachschauen.
Langlaeufer (2022-12-22 15:00:38+00:00): Mach das ruhig mal, bis dahin kann es erstmal so bleibe.
Frohes Fest und weiterhin frohes mappen
UTroe (2023-01-05 09:49:27+00:00): Hallo, die Strecke zwischen Coppengrave und Duingen ist jetzt durchgängig 100 km/h. Früher waren kurz vorm Ortseingang Duingen 70. Die sind aber nicht mehr.
LuxuryCoop (2022-12-23 07:39:52+00:00): 안녕하세요! 오픈스트리트맵에 기여해 주셔서 감사드립니다.
바뀜집합 검토 요청을 주셔서 확인해 본 결과, 문제가 없습니다.
앞으로도 꾸준한 기여 부탁드립니다!
aceman444 (2024-10-15 22:19:55+00:00): Zdravim, na pouzitie toho FIS zdroja pre obkreslenie tras do OSM je udelene povolenie? Kde je mozne ho najst? A inak hned prva trasa FIS 2,5km ma inu trasu v OSM ako na tej stranke a ma 2,69km namiesto 2,5km. Aj ked teda tam maju trasy dlhe 2,5km asi 3, ale ani jedna sa nenazyva "Okolo Slepeho plesa" a ani jedna nema priebeh ako je v OSM. Tak podla akeho systemu to upravujete v OSM?
Matúš Jančík (2024-10-15 23:44:50+00:00): Dakujem za reakciu. Spolupracoval som z poverenia obce Strba ako prevadzkovatela trati pri samotnej homologacii a aj na tych tratiach organizujeme sportove podujatia, tak mojou snahou bolo hlavne pospajat existujuce cesty, aby boli znazornene aj ine okruhy ako len povodny 5 km okruh, nakolko tam existuju prepojky, ktore vytvaraju trate 3,3 a 3.75 atd.

Zaroven sa do map opakovane dostavaju okruhy okolo jazera, ktore sa uz roky neupravuju, resp. su vyuzivane iba chodcami a OSM data si preberaju bezkarske trate v mapy.cz a ine portaly.

Dlzky okruhov v homologacii tiez nie su presne 2500 metrov alebo 3.75 km a podobne, ale maju urcitu toleranciu, ktoru povoluju pravidla aj samotny proces homologacie. 

Najvacsi rozdiel oproti FIS certifikatom tvori asi aj to, ze v trate v certifikatoch na webe FIS zacinaju zhruba v polovici tenisovych kurtov, ja som tie startove body ponechal tak ako boli povodne trate, cize par metrov severnejsie. V zime sa upravuje uplne cely stadion, na pretekoch sa start posuva podla podmienok a urovne jednotlivych podujati.

Inspektor, ktory robil FIS certifikat nam dal nam k dispozicii aj povodne GPX subory, ale nemam az take znalosti, aby som ich vedel vyuzit, skor som sa snazil, aby tie trate boli dobre viditelne a kopirovali teren bez stromov aj cez satelit aj aby som neposuval vsetky povodne cesty.

Samotne nazvy nie su sucastou FIS certifikatov, ale v stredisku pracujeme s tymito nazvami ako su v poslednych mapkach https://abl.sk/zima/trate/

Okrem samotnych FIS certifikatov sa na tych tratiach vyuzivaju aj ine kombinacie okruhov, ale prioritne by bolo dobre zachovat hlavne tie FIS okruhy, nakolko je to z pohladu lyzovania najvyznamnejsie.

Nazvy su zauzivane aj sportovcami.
2.5 km okolo Slepeho plesa
5 km Furkotska dolina alebo len Furkota atd. V minulosti boli trate aj severovychodne od Hotela FIS, ktore sa zas volali 2.5 km Mlynica atd.

Ak by ste mali moznost to zdokonalit, resp. s vasimi skusenostami to vylepsit, rad vam poskytnem pomoc.
eggie (2022-12-21 18:02:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Hier is iets niet helemaal goed gegaan. Je pad zit aan de landuse vastgeplakt en is bij schuiven meegekomen.

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130342930
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-12-21 18:06:57+00:00): Je pad heb ik even losgemaakt op drie plaatsen van de landuse en verbonden met de Vierwindenlaan. Het zou anders niet routeren.
Plakken kun je voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gevruikens tijdens tekenen.

Veel plezier met mappen,
eggie
eggie (2022-12-21 18:12:21+00:00): Van het highway=path (Germanenweg)  heb ik een highway=track gemaakt. Het is breed genoeg voor bv bosvoertuigen of voor auto's van de bewoners. 
Evt kun je het tracktype=grade? toevoegen
Zie tracktype https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:NL:Map_Features:tracktype
eggie (2022-12-21 18:29:31+00:00): ... en wie heeft hier achter de 'slagbomen' toegang  Alleen wandelaars?
Coenvanbakel (2022-12-21 22:07:02+00:00): denk voor de feedback, achter de slagboom kunnen wandelaars en mountainbikers komen
eggie (2022-12-21 22:13:36+00:00): Oke...  Dan zou je bicycle=yes kunnen toevoegen aan de slagboom. Dan routeert de slagboom. Wat is ook wel eens doe is een olifantenpaadje (highway=path) om de slagboom erbij intekenen, want dat is vaak het geval. 

Aan de track zelf zou je motor_vehicle=no kunnen toevoegen.. Je kunt immers ook van de andere kante(en)  bij de slagbomen komen.

Kijk je zelf nog even? 

Mapse,
eggie
Coenvanbakel (2022-12-21 22:22:58+00:00): ok, dank voor je hulp, ik heb olifantenpaadje gemaakt en motor_vehicle=no bij paadje gezet
Carto'Cité (2023-02-23 10:13:06+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour les contributions.

En fait le quai sud de la gare de Dreux est fermé : j'ai donc supprimé public_transport=platform et ajouté access=yes, mais conservé railway=platform car physiquement ça reste un quai, ce n'est juste plus un quai utilisé pour le transport.

J'ai également enlevé railway=station du périmètre de la gare https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/773013318 (qui conserve le tag public_transport=station), ce tag étant présent sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10197668467. Les 2 restent liés par la relation stop_area.
Cf. schéma en haut de la page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Gares_ferroviaires

Bonne continuation !
Antoine de Carto‘Cité pour SNCF #Transilien
aweech (2022-12-29 00:15:41+00:00): Hi,
I reviewed your edit, and thank you for your contribution! I went ahead and removed the rest of the information about the company from the node (phone number, name, website, etc.).
Alexosterrieth (2022-12-21 17:46:29+00:00): The source for this modification was actually SPY(allonie) PICC numerical imagery, not SPW(allonie) most recent aerial imagery
RaphaelPasloin (2022-12-22 00:50:18+00:00): Bonjour,

Pour dessiner les buldings utilisez la couche Imagerie numérique SPW(allonie) PICC sinon les formes sont déformées.
Hufkratzer (2023-01-06 21:02:43+00:00): Hi, du hast an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/194344618 building=yes durch leisure=horse_riding ersetzt. Nach dem Luftbild sind es aber Gebäude. Gebäude sollten ein building-Tag haben (egal, was sie sonst noch für Tags haben).
Das Tag leisure=horse_riding (iD-Preset "Reitanlage") ist ausserdem gar nicht für Gebäude gedacht, sondern sollte für das komplette Gelände der Reitanlage (inkl. aller zug. Gebäude, Reitplätze etc.) verwendet werden, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1117878902 hast du ebenfalls von building=yes auf leisure=horse_riding umgetaggt. Ich weiss nicht genau, was das ist (vermutlich eine überdachte Führanlage oder ein überdachter Longierzirkel/Roundpen), aber für eine Reitanlage ist es jedenfalls viel zu klein.

Bei dir in der Gegend haben solche Umtaggings leider auch noch einige andere gemacht, aber vielleicht kannst dich trotzdem damit anfreunden, das Reitanlagen-Tag (leisure=horse_riding) lieber so zu verwenden, wie es das Wiki beschreibt und wie es überwiegend verwendet wird. Hier ein schweizer Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30220880
NorthCrab (2022-12-21 18:09:09+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!
Poprosiliście o weryfikację zmian.

Na https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3817348604 pozostawiłeś numer telefonu i adres starej lokacji. Prawdopodobnie do poprawy.

Uważaj także aby nie tworzyć punktów na krawędziach obszarów - https://i.imgur.com/NZL2zMq.png - ponieważ utrudnia to edycję mapy przyszłym użytkownikom.

I jako ostatnie - proszę lepiej opisuj swoje zmiany ponieważ data zmian jest umieszczana automatycznie.

Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab (2022-12-21 18:09:52+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
You have asked for verification of the changes.

At https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3817348604 you left the phone number and address of the old location. Probably to be corrected.

Also, be careful not to create points on the edges of areas - https://i.imgur.com/NZL2zMq.png - as this makes editing the map more difficult for future users.

And as a last point - please describe your changes better as the date of changes is posted automatically.

Greetings!

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator
Rogoyski (2023-03-11 18:48:35+00:00): Po co zlikwidowałeś odcinki chodnika łączące zamknięte przejście podziemne z resztą dróg pieszych?
Rogoyski (2023-03-11 18:49:15+00:00): Przejście podziemne było już oznaczone jako zamknięte.
Tatfahren (2023-01-02 15:25:48+00:00): Es wurde wieder von einem neuen Nutzer hinzugefügt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130788556
gurglypipe (2022-12-21 18:55:15+00:00): Hi! The trig pillar has a note attached to it:

“Accurate location import for imagery offset calibration. Please do not move.”

Just checking, but were you aware of this and its implications? Are you using offset imagery, or the default satellite imagery alignment in iD?

Thanks
user_16720371 (2022-12-21 19:30:20+00:00): Hi, yes I was up Skiddaw at the weekend and the trig point actual location was well off where it was on the map. It is not in the correct position.

Cheers.
user_16720371 (2022-12-21 19:31:07+00:00): It is now in the correct position
gurglypipe (2022-12-21 19:37:03+00:00): The correct position relative to what map/coordinate system/imagery?
Wulf4096 (2023-06-28 14:03:22+00:00): https://www.abendblatt.de/hamburg/hamburg-nord/article238810399/U5-Baustelle-spektakulaere-Aktion-mitten-in-der-Nacht.html

Neue Brücke soll breiter werden und im Herbst fertig sein.
harumiusinc (2022-12-21 19:14:47+00:00): cycleway=crossing
MrMoehritz (2023-04-01 19:28:16+00:00): Hi peter82828,

willkommen bei OSM, schöner erster Edit!
Herrieman (2022-12-21 19:06:35+00:00): + wandelroute "Groene Wissel" verwijderd, nav note die aangaf dat route niet aangegeven staat en OSM geen rechten heeft
ivanbranco (2025-05-24 07:34:39+00:00): Hi Skinva,

you are the last mapper who touched these objects, maybe you can reply to these notes?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3849503
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3849504

thanks
Zandu (2023-11-17 17:09:35+00:00): Not an import. Hand drawn from recent Bing imagery and locally verified. Tag modifications were removing them from ways and putting them on relations to minimize overlapping ways.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130345670
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-12-31 14:12:15+00:00): no deberías haber eliminado estos caminos internos aquí https://osmcha.org/changesets/130345991/
mego_map (2022-12-22 13:38:32+00:00): Hello Andrew915;
I noticed you removed many buildings that have good data, By mistake you removed them.
Please be aware when you added new buildings and don't remove the buildings that already exist and don't make them overlap.
I fixed this issue and reverted the buildings as they were.
Examples for buildings
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/31820652
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/31820655
Regards
mego_map
plennert (2022-12-22 05:54:24+00:00): level=Erdgeschoss gibt es nicht
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:level

schaut ihr euch das nochmal an?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130346587
limes11 (2023-01-11 19:17:42+00:00): Hi, 

Bitte am Gate den access ergänzen. Ohne Wert müssen die Router raten und viele werden weiterhin hier entlangrouten. 

Danke Limes
eggie (2022-12-21 20:48:36+00:00): Hoi.  Je vraagt feedback.
Kleinigheidje...
.. club=sport ontbreekt nog

Groet..
eggie
NorthCrab (2022-12-22 19:34:42+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!
Poprosiliście o weryfikację zmian.

Uważam że można bardzo uprościć tagowanie tej ścieżki, proponuję jedynie te tagi:
highway=path
surface=dirt
width=0.3

highway=path automatycznie wzbrania przejazdu samochodem.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Poland

Pozdrawiam!
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-12-27 01:25:28+00:00): There is missing a via node on the turn restriction
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-01-12 14:44:21+00:00): I fixed it.
dreua (2024-03-17 18:26:03+00:00): Hallo und danke für deinen Beitrag zur OpenStreetMap!
Ich habe hier das "crossing" Wegstück wieder gelöscht, da es ohne Anbindung an weitere Wege keinen Sinn ergibt. Die Tags können alle auch auf dem zentralen Cossing Punkt gesetzt werden, da habe ich übertragen was noch nicht vorhanden war. Die Bürgersteige sind hier ja implizit an der Straße getaggt und nicht einzeln eingezeichnet, daher ist die Ampel nur als Punkt vollkommen ausreichend.
Viele Grüße
David
user_12500175 (2022-12-23 00:56:52+00:00): Hallo,
schau mal das Gebäude WaldbergerStr. 15 an, da ist dir ein Knoten abhandengekommen :-)

Noch ein Tipp, wenn du in ID bei Bildmaterial auf Bing Maps umstellst ist das Bild in unserer Gegend schärfer als Bavaria (80cm)

Gruß
Danfost
eggie (2022-12-21 22:10:13+00:00): Dag Trailrunnert..
Lijkt me oke..
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-12-21 22:07:22+00:00): Hoi..  Lijkt me oke nu.. Het routeert.
groet
eggie
Diacritic (2022-12-22 08:25:57+00:00): Hi icttd,

Thanks for your contributions around the Western Port Highway.

I've adjusted your edit, as you've inadvertently converted the section of the road into a "link" road. Link roads are more suitable to on ramps and off ramps, rather than main carriageways.

Happy Mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130348611
Zandu (2023-11-17 17:08:57+00:00): Not an import. Hand drawn from recent Bing imagery and locally verified. Tag modifications were removing them from ways and putting them on relations to minimize overlapping ways.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130348650
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-12-26 23:13:43+00:00): Please check the entire sign, including additional panels.

This is not a general turn restriction. 
And it seems that this should be tagged as access on the gravel part of Vråbyvej instead of turn restrictions.
kfremd (2022-12-28 23:53:11+00:00): Hello! I have removed the turn restriction as requested. I am curious what 'access=' tag would best represent this restriction, as I am not sure if making the road access=private would allow for residential traffic through. I look forward to hearing more soon! Cheers, kfremd
Kovoschiz (2022-12-22 11:20:48+00:00): Please check that this sailing is suspended indefinitely.
MapPiper (2022-12-23 00:31:03+00:00): Hi Kovoschiz, thank you for adding the additional information. Does this ferry still operate as the Star Ferry Water Tour and provide transport from Disneyland? If so, I propose adding an access=customers tag in addition to route=ferry would be an accurate way to map this feature.
okwithmydecay (2023-04-24 09:18:27+00:00): Is the traffic calming on Buxton Street (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10278940923) actually part of the crossing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10835658061 ?
rskedgell (2023-11-07 15:17:52+00:00): This was part of the botched TfLCID import, abandoned in 2023-01. TfL's surveyors took photographs in 2017, which are part of the dataset. It is highly unlikely that @luxiaghd looked at these, or any other data sources in order to understand the context of the imported node.

https://cycleassetimages.data.tfl.gov.uk/RWG071380_1.jpg
https://cycleassetimages.data.tfl.gov.uk/RWG071380_2.jpg
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-12-26 23:43:40+00:00): Turn restriction only for trucks
kfremd (2022-12-28 20:48:32+00:00): Hello! Thank you for looking into this turn restriction. I have updated the restriction with an except=bicycle;moped;motorcar;psv tag to allow access to normal traffic except hgv/trucks. I hope that this works well for the situation. If this does not work the way it should, or if it could be modeled better, please feel free to let me know. Thanks, kfremd
Zandu (2023-11-17 17:07:41+00:00): Not an import. Hand drawn from recent Bing imagery and locally verified. Tag modifications were removing them from ways and putting them on relations to minimize overlapping ways.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130349933
eggie (2022-12-22 07:36:19+00:00): Dag Coen.. access=no  (Verboden Toegang)  is icm ander accesstags bijna altijd fout. Ik heb het even omgezet naar motor_vehicle=no.

Dan zal de rendering van de weg ook wel weer terugkomen.
Even CTRL-f5 toetsen.

MVG
eggie
Glassman (2022-12-22 01:38:07+00:00): #TIP: Instead of deleting gnis id's merge the data with the building you added. That save the history of the object.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130350462
Ryan L Welsh (2022-12-22 04:00:00+00:00): Thank you for the feedback, and the tip, Glassman! I'll read up on it more and get informed.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-12-22 11:51:10+00:00): Hi! Thanks for adding sidewalks. However, make sure these are connected to the rest of the network and use the correct street names on them. Take a look at the sidewalks and crossings around the main boulevards which are correctly connected and with the right tags. Thanks!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-12-22 17:31:08+00:00): Please use this offset on Bing imagery as well: 0.6,-1.54
yasslay (2022-12-24 16:04:23+00:00): Thanks!
silversurfer83 (2022-12-22 21:16:41+00:00): Hey there,
thanks for your contribution :)

Please, in the futre, watch out for your geographical size. You changed something in Swindon and in Helsinki.
That ain't cool.
In the future pleae change something in Englang, then save, then change something somewhere else :)

Happy Mapping
silversurfer83
user_15257861 (2022-12-22 21:18:35+00:00): I had assumed it was a spelling error since these two places were the only locations that used "building:color" instead of "building:colour". Thank you for the information.
user_15257861 (2022-12-22 21:27:23+00:00): Aha, I see what you meant now. Don't make a changeset across multiple countries? Thanks, that makes sense.
silversurfer83 (2022-12-22 21:31:58+00:00): Hi
Yeah. That's why I came across the changeset. 
It's just, that these kind of changes pop up on the radar of quite some people monitoring their neighborhood. 
If it aint happening in the future, everything's fine :)

Have a great one
silversurfer83
yasslay (2022-12-24 15:55:55+00:00): Hello!

I noticed that you changed an unnamed tertiary road to a primary road (tagged as trunk under OSM guidelines) as part of the A28. I'm pretty sure this part of the road here isn't considered to be part of the A28 when taking into account that a (stub of a) residential road from the current Saxon Fields development connects onto the road in question here.

I haven't surveyed the location recently, but I know there's some signage pointing to the road being the A28, but this is only coming off of the A2, and from what I can remember there's a non-primary road sign approaching the junction after turning off of the A2.

I won't touch the road for now until I come to a conclusion on what the road should be tagged as from the discussion here.

If you're wondering, this is the road I'm talking about:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154350709

Kind regards and happy mapping,
yasslay
Nathan_A_RF (2022-12-24 22:51:57+00:00): Hi.

Don't trust signage all the time. I know of multiple occasions where primary/non-primary signs are incorrectly used. I'd highly doubt that this new short two-way link between two primary (trunk in OSM) routes would be unclassified/tertiary, hence why I changed it when I saw it.

It could be part of the A2 instead of the A28 - not sure. Change it to that ref if you feel so. What I do know is it's not both numbers, and not none.

The KCC public highways map has not been updated yet so the status and number can't be determined for sure as it stands. Until then, this is probably the best tagging to use.

Nathan
yasslay (2022-12-24 23:14:12+00:00): I see what you mean. I suppose at this point that the best thing for us to do is guess; and I think you made a good call here by changing the tagging of the road here. I agree with you on that it's the A28; it seems unlikely that this is otherwise, especially considering how the other roads link into this section road. Thanks a ton for doing this.

Kind regards and happy mapping,
yasslay
aTarom (2022-12-22 15:08:22+00:00): Hola Manelch,
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1124015170/history

se trata de un edificio? al no verse en las imágenes aéreas, quizás es una nueva construcción?

Saludos y gracias por editar
Manelch (2022-12-23 08:43:24+00:00): Si es un edificio en construcción en un mes estará en funcionamiento.

Saludos.
AndresDuhour (2023-07-14 21:03:34+00:00): Buenas tardes! Quería consultarte si el sendero se pudo verificar en el lugar o si se dibujó en base a imágenes. Por ahí yo pondría una etiqueta note o description en vez de name para el sendero supuesto. Saludos!
Andrés
aceman444 (2023-06-27 22:46:18+00:00): No to, ze to bicykel zvladne je pekne, ale je to aj legalne?
Inak to, ze na ceste nie je bicycle=yes neznamena, ze tam cyklista nemoze. Moze predsa bicykel tlacit. Cize pridavanie bicycle=yes na kazdu cestu len preto, ze tadial vedie cyklotrasa (ako niektori robia), nemusi byt vhodne.
Cyklotrasy dokonca vedu aj cez cesty, kde je bicycle=no alebo vehicle=no. Znovu, da sa tlacit.

A ten nazov cesty bol teda gol, este ze ho uz ludia dali prec.
mizoslav (2023-07-03 11:29:30+00:00): Vážený admin predmetnej oblasti,
súhlasím s posledným tvrdením. Áno, ten názov bol ironický ulet z frustrácie, ale aj tak stále trvám na navrhovanej zmene. Inak, vás tam budem musieť dotianuť spoza obrázky PC osobne, aby ste sa na vlastné oči presvedčily, že ide o chybu v mapovom diele OSM. Ten úsek síce nie je hladký ako detská prdelka, ale ani zďaleka nevhodný pre cestný bicykel. Okrem toho vedie tade oficiálna cyklotrasa 8425. Stačí len nastaviť atribút "vhodné pre cestný bicykel" na áno (yes). Je nonsense, aby kvôli chybe v OSM, všetky ostatné plánovače trasy navrhovali cestným cyklistom nebezpečnú obchádzku po medzinárodnej tranzitnej ceste E442 (Bytče - Makov), a ďalej po cyklotrase 2401 (Makov - Kasárne).
Dúfam, že moje argumenty ešte raz citlivo zvážite a zmeníte názor na vec a problematku cestnej cyklistiky ako takej.

S pozdravom
Mizo