piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rhhs (2026-01-20 11:55:45+00:00): Thank you! I replaced the Review clothes shop with the bakery. Did you know that in Organic Maps, you can edit the information of an existing shop, including if a new kind of shop has entered it? That's a better way to improve the map than to add a new shop... ;)
Aleksandar26 (2026-01-20 12:12:20+00:00): I am new to this, thank you! So you nean I should rename it? I dint see how to change the category. Even earlier I tried to add new place and cluld find category for it so I left a note.
Dimitar155 (2026-01-20 13:41:15+00:00): Organic Maps can't change the category. You can rename it but you should add a note for the new category (at the bottom of the edit interface).

Alternatively you can try EveryDoor (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Every_Door) which allows all changes to shops and amenities (and other objects).
rhhs (2026-01-20 13:56:41+00:00): You are right, Mitko! StreetComplete is another nice app that allows you to make many simple edits to the map, while Vespucci is one that is very powerful but a bit more complicated.
ivanbranco (2026-05-12 17:33:41+00:00): Hi wegavision,

I wonder why you did delete the multipoligon I made for the grass landuse? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14947272/history

thanks and good mapping
ticho2 (2026-02-20 20:38:23+00:00): Ahoj, je toto nejake extra parkovacie miesto? Lebo parkovisko je tu uz zakreslene ako plocha, vid https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345469226
celmap (2026-01-26 10:40:06+00:00): Greetings! The previous edit is already correct, as it was a three building side by side.
This edit makes it as if there's another building between it.
World_Winner (2026-01-28 08:47:26+00:00): Hi celmap. 
There was an issue with buildings overlapping each other, and while addressing that, I relied on the not-so-clear imagery and altered the geometries as well. Thank you very much for reaching out and informing me about the local context, much appreciated. I will be more cautious in unclear situations like this and will focus on the data issue without altering geometries unless I’m sure.
1Mmarek (2026-02-20 21:22:56+00:00): Ahoj, tu sa žiadna stanica nenachádza - len si niečo skúšal? Bod odstraňujem preč.
silversurfer83 (2026-02-08 21:03:53+00:00): Moin

wonach bist du denn bei den Adressen gegangen? Du hast leider keine Quelle angegeben (du kannst JOSM automatisch alle aktiven layer als Quelle angeben lassen...)
giggie (2026-02-08 21:23:34+00:00): Die Adressen habe ich im Geoportal Hessen eingesehen: https://www.geoportal.hessen.de/map?gui_id=Geoportal-Hessen
Bei genauerer Betrachtung stammen sie dort aus dem eingebundenen Layer von TopPlusOpen, das seine Daten wiederum vom Land bekommt... woher genau sie ursprünglich kommen, kann ich somit leider nicht genau beurteilen.
silversurfer83 (2026-02-08 21:25:39+00:00): Alles klar. Danke für die Rückmeldung.

Bei zweien scheint was nicht zu stimmen, da deine Werte nicht mit dem ALKIS übereinstimmen (welches ich idR für Adressen verwende, wenn ich nicht vor Ort bin)
silversurfer83 (2026-02-08 21:26:15+00:00): (ach ja: Gerne in Zukunft ne Quelle an die Änderungen. Hilft mir bei der QS. Danke :)
giggie (2026-02-09 20:55:40+00:00): Tatsache, die 6 und 8 sind eigentlich die 4 und 6. Danke für die Korrektur
osmviborg (2026-01-20 09:24:38+00:00): Zoom ind på ruten, den er fyldt med 'huller'.
kortgodt (2026-01-20 19:32:32+00:00): Det er meget muligt jeg lappede bare to åbenlyse 'huller' du er velkommen til at rette resten hvor du ser dem.
BCNorwich (2026-01-22 08:14:46+00:00): Hi, you've added many sections of duplicated highways by placing a new highway on top of an existing highway. This could cause disruption to routing.

If a highway needs correcting, please correct the existing highway. In this manner, the OSM history of the way will be maintained.

I've removed 17 sections of duplicated highway.

Regards Bernard.
Supaplex (2026-01-22 04:50:45+00:00): Mandarin name: 誠星青年旅館
tschoerbi (2026-01-23 13:35:31+00:00): Thanks for adding some additional details.
silversurfer83 (2026-01-20 18:43:53+00:00): Hello raebeamer,

there are some things I'd like you to improve:

- please don't add names like "building" to buildings. It is considered wrong in more than 99% of the cases (your's in one of those wrong cases)

- please do not move about the world without uploading your changes. You will produce disgruntled mappers all over the world.

- 8 Birkin Ave. is clearly too large. Please adjust according to aerials.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Fraxi (2026-01-21 09:19:50+00:00): Здравейте!
Направих някои промени по етикетите съобразно с приетото в OSM. Тъй като правих някои измествания и корекции в района, можете да преместите точката за агенцията, ако не е на правилното място.
TheSwavu (2026-01-21 09:32:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM.

This is the second time that you have broken the mapping of Brisbane Waters. It would be helpful if you:

1. Provide changeset comments that explain what you are trying to achieve rather than "simple edits", which could be anything. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

2. Wait till you have some mapping experience before attempting advanced topics. The iD editor is not the best option for editing multipolygons.

3. natural=bay mapping needs to be in addition to the mapping of a water body, not replacing it. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dbay

I have had to revert this changeset and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177465101

Thank you.
mueschel (2026-01-21 10:48:48+00:00): Hi,
please check your edits. It should be "building=construction", not "constraction=yes"
Andrea Musuruane (2026-01-20 09:45:10+00:00): Stai vandalizzando la mappa!
Riccardo_MakingScience (2026-01-20 10:19:48+00:00): Chiedo scusa, stavamo facendo un test sul tool con l'agenzia. Non era nostra intenzione causare malumori
flohoff (2026-01-20 12:02:33+00:00): Moin,
dieser changeset hat das Routing ziemlich beeinflusst - Was mich ein wenig gewundert hat nach dem Changeset kommentar:

Das ist die routingänderung - Rot alt - Grün neu:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=655147,1197528#51.27571,6.18874,14z

Und ich vermute es hängt mit dem weg hier zusammen:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28657784

Das lane_markings=no hast du gelöscht - Also wenn müsste das doch yes sein oder? 

Egal - deswegen wird jedenfalls die straße "besser" und das routing schwenkt da.

Ich vermute das durchgangsverkehr eigentlich nicht über den Westwall und Nordwall soll.

Flo
waldhans (2026-01-20 13:15:10+00:00): Welchen Router hast du genommen? Ich bekomme den grünen Weg nicht hin, nicht man mit brouter.
Und eigentlich sollte kein Einfluss auf das Routing entstanden sein.
mfg Kurt
flohoff (2026-01-20 23:16:00+00:00): OSRM - Aber meine installation weil ich die daten alle 30 Minuten update und dann geometrie vergleiche zwischen vorher und nachher mache - Damit kriege ich automatische mails wenn sich die länge ändert und dann die jeweiligen geometrieen dazu.

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/

Hier ist das überwachte Netz und die Knotenpunkte zwischen denen ich rechne

Hier die notifications auf der Mailingliste:

https://gt.owl.de/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/osm-owl-routeqa@gt.owl.de/

Flo
waldhans (2026-01-21 15:09:54+00:00): Der einzige Unterschied ist ja das Umlegen der Radwege auf eigene Pfade am Westwall.

Warum dann der Router einen 950 m längeren und 16s langsameren Weg wählt, erschließt sich mir nicht. 

Ich habe keine Ahnung, ob ich hier etwas beitragen kann. Gib mir einen Tipp, was ich machen kann.

wal
NeisBot (2026-01-21 07:25:20+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13470172121 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Self Storage"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 07:32:48+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177792502
(No visible changes after review)
maro21 (2026-01-20 22:22:35+00:00): Co to za źródło "własne"?
Czym zadaszone jest to torowisko? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182407089
DanielJ90 (2026-01-21 06:22:45+00:00): poprawiono zadaszenie, dzięki
maro21 (2026-01-22 22:04:14+00:00): Czy mógłbyś odpowiedzieć na pytanie? Jakie jest źródło tej edycji?
NeisBot (2026-01-21 07:20:53+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1468689240 v1 | 11 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177467494
Famlam (2026-01-21 23:31:20+00:00): FYI, ik heb flat Stella weer wat hersteld: 
- stond nu een dubbel building tag op en een loze area=yes
- opleverjaar verdwenen, evenals de BAG tags
- building:flats die niet overeenkomt met wat ik kon vinden noch met het aantal huisnummers
pitfire (2026-01-21 09:29:56+00:00): Hallo kublema ,

wurde der Standort mit der Beschilderung
(traffic_sign=DE:260;257-51) 
für den gesamten Trassenabschnitt Wegverlauf: An der Wolfsburg (23338594) verändert? 
Die von Dir erfassten Einschränkungen werden erst wenige Meter vor der Einmündung auf den Erna-Neubauer-Damm gültig!  

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=313382106895552&focus=photo&lat=50.74546832328&lng=7.1157285702178&z=18.56392192351324&x=0.568724857235015&y=0.47674876550967715&zoom=0.574108818011257

VG pitfire
kublema (2026-01-21 09:43:24+00:00): Hallo pitfire,

danke für den Hinweis! Die Beschilderung untersagt es dem MIV erst ab der letzten Zufahrt zur Wolfsburg, auf der Straße "an der Wolfsburg" zu fahren. Ich habe dies eben korrigiert 

VG!
iwhs (2026-02-20 15:21:26+00:00): 'Isle of Wight', Please!
philipcullen (2026-02-20 15:40:38+00:00): Ah yes, Isle of Wight not White, I must have done the changeset comments in a hurry.
aboc (2026-02-07 19:00:11+00:00): Attento, hai modificato accidentalmente un quartiere.
bionico (2026-02-08 10:46:42+00:00): Scusa, mi dai maggiori info?
Quale quartiere, ti riferisci a quello indicato come IMQ?
aboc (2026-02-08 11:33:55+00:00): Il percorso 404140227 aveva ereditato i dati dello svincolo ed era passato da un quartiere ad area di uno svincolo. L’ho sistemato come stavo aggiornando l’aeroporto dato che l’area si sovrapponeva. Penso iD abbia fatto qualche merge come hai spostato dei punti dello svincolo
Sébastien Pi (2026-02-17 13:34:56+00:00): Bonjour Adrien,

Vous aviez inclu la Marque (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36948354) dans le réseau point-nœud (49-51). Vous me payez un vélo-pédalo ;) ?
J’ai corrigé. Normalement c’est bon.

@+
NeisBot (2026-01-21 07:25:23+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13455828131 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Software company office"
---
Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего текста могла бы быть: "Офис компании по разработке программного обеспечения"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-28 07:32:49+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/177560503
silversurfer83 (2026-01-20 19:28:05+00:00): Hi there :)

I have some issues with this edit:

- you clearly did not read the challenge properly. It asked you to map a pond *IF* there is one in the designated location. You added a basin (and used too many nodes in my mind, but that's debatable)

- please don't hop farther than next county when editing. 

- you went to map in North America and I would like to know why you set a residential road to highway=service + access=private and deleted a track that has been imported using the TIGER data set. It was mislabled but not wrong.

Please look very closely when mapping from imagery and maybe only map familiar places in the beginning.

If in doubt, please ask in one of the chat groups, the forum at c.osm.org and consult the wiki at wiki.osm.org

cheers
dmjab13 (2026-01-20 18:48:10+00:00): please do not submit changesets spanning multiple continents
uprkos (2026-07-15 20:38:29+00:00): Zastanawiam się co zrobić z https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/788256603 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/788256601

Widzę, że edytowałeś w styczniu, ale dziś tam się wpakowałem i te ścieżki są nieprzechodnie. Tzn. da się przedrzeć, bo jakoś mi się to ostatecznie udało, ale osty były wyższe ode mnie, rower torował mi drogę dopóki trawa nie powkręcała się wszędzie.

Podejrzewam że w zimie to wygląda inaczej...
empty_child (2026-01-20 10:45:55+00:00): Добрый день
Конечно, такой перевод еще надо было придумать. Не деревня, а поселок. В контексте города - поселение. Ну и царицу Тамар лучше не склонять, хоть и вразрез с правилами русского языка
Stephsoft (2026-01-25 16:35:31+00:00): Bedankt voor je bijdrage! Ik vraag me alleen af of het nuttig is om de buurten als losse nodes in te tekenen, in plaats van als area.
Empty Block (2026-01-25 19:44:09+00:00): Kan ook inderdaad. Kijk bij https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=177469453#map=15/53.19242/5.80682 voor hoe een wijk en label aan wijk geplaatst kan worden https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=177469453#map=20/53.1920801/5.8027477

Op community is dit topic ook relevant: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wijk-en-buurtkaart-cbs-akkoord-beschikbaarheid-openstreetmap/80129/17

In Leusden er ook voor gekozen om volksmond namen te gebruiken. Bijv. een Hamersveld te laten staan en niet de wijken Hamersveld Oud en Nieuw los weer te geven en wel Valleipark en niet Buitengebied Leusden-Centrum Oost.
Stephsoft (2026-01-25 20:29:26+00:00): Ik zie dat het inderdaad als allebei voorkomt. Misschien ga ik er eens voor zitten om de grenzen in te tekenen, maargoed: de nodes zijn een goede toevoeging :)
Taya_S (2026-01-20 11:11:40+00:00): Reverted vandalism, please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19570

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177470716
Lunaclaudioclaudilunaperez (2026-01-28 02:32:51+00:00): Cómo puedo encontrar a una persona la ubicasion real 2464707387
Taya_S (2026-01-28 07:24:51+00:00): This number "2464707387" does not refer to any person on OSM. It is just a way to identify a node in our database which just randomly happens to belong to a random house.

OSM also does not store or track personal information of people.
GinaroZ (2026-03-10 16:42:52+00:00): Not sure why you decided to add a bunch of duplicate nodes for churches etc based on OS 2016 data, but I've removed them all. Please take care editing in future.
muralito (2026-01-20 15:19:26+00:00): Hi. This is a pedestrianized street, not a service road.
muralito (2026-01-20 15:23:47+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=821256782659980
Prasanna Msamy (2026-01-21 00:34:16+00:00): Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you.

Regards,
Prasanna Devi
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 06:45:36+00:00): Hello!

You used
building=houseй
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1230785286/history

Have you maybe meant
building=house
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
neviksasha (2026-02-04 08:27:54+00:00): Hi!
Yes, it just a typo. Thank you!
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 10:07:44+00:00): thanks for a fix!
NeisBot (2026-01-21 07:25:26+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/278193243 v6

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cantera de Comillas"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Cantera de Comillas"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 07:32:50+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177792503
(No visible changes after review)
MxxCon (2026-01-21 18:43:33+00:00): Hello.
When adding sidewalks, please map them as a single way curb to curb. There's no need to arbitrarily split them in a middle of a block or create small "antenna" segments near curbs/intersections.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177471233
Anusha Kodi (2026-04-17 02:57:42+00:00): Thank you for your valuable feedback. I will make sure to be more cautious in future. Thank you.
MxxCon (2026-04-17 03:01:03+00:00): (Also 3 month after a comment is rather long time... Can make a lot of mistakes in that time without addressing them...😓)
NeisBot (2026-01-21 07:25:30+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/628424954 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Meblowy Sklep"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i fakticzna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Meblowy Sklep"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 07:32:50+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177792504
(No visible changes after review)
ArchangelEkim (2026-01-21 10:43:41+00:00): Hi Ethan, just wanted to let you know the Queenscliff ferry is not under Transport Victoria. Its a private tourist ferry completely separate. Also westgate punt is missing in this changeset. All the info is here:
https://transport.vic.gov.au/plan-a-journey/public-transport-tools-and-resources/travel-tips-and-resources/ferries
ArchangelEkim (2026-01-21 11:10:15+00:00): Reverted Queenscliff ferry tags here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177516313
mueschel (2026-01-25 10:12:39+00:00): Hi,
you used some uncommon tags here - could you check the wiki how memorials or monuments are usually added in OSM?
E.g.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmemorial
qstep (2026-01-25 12:07:05+00:00): Fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177678858
NeisBot (2026-01-21 07:25:34+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13470378579 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Japońska restauracja"
---
Na przykład bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Japońska restauracja"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 07:32:50+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177792505
(No visible changes after review)
eggie (2026-01-20 11:55:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.



Je edits..https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=177472059

Wanneer je een node verplaatst waar wegen en landuse aan vastzitten komt alles mee. Niet alles lijkt meer te renderen.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-01-20 11:58:06+00:00): Ook zijn twee wandelroutes nu onderbroken.
eggie (2026-01-20 11:59:18+00:00): Waarom maak je een coastline.. Dit is toch niet de oever van een rivier of een zee?
Beheerder Veluwe Noord (2026-01-20 11:59:39+00:00): Beste, Deze waren al onderbroken. Overal lagen losse stukjes....
eggie (2026-01-20 12:02:50+00:00): Maak svp nooit combinaties met access=no en andere acecsstags
eggie (2026-01-20 12:05:57+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. 
Hoe lopen hier nu de routes Nieuw Milligen en het Veluwe zwerfpad?
Ik pas in ieder geval even iets aan zodat het weer routeert.
access=no is echt verkeerd om te taggen.
Dat betekent verboden toegang.
eggie (2026-01-20 12:08:34+00:00): Je veranderde wel erg veel hier.
tracktype grade1 is bv een asfaltweg. maar surface=ground is dan een tegenstelling.
Beheerder Veluwe Noord (2026-01-20 12:19:53+00:00): Dag/Beste ???

Nog geen idee wie of wat je bent. Ik pas de kaart nog verder aan ( moet nog verder ontdekken hoe) voornaamste en belangrijkst voor nu is de toegankelijk bezoekers in deze gebieden! 

gradatie pad, soorten ondergrond, rand van het veen  pas ik wel aan. ik kon NOG geen heide vinden. er stond scrubland.... dat is het vooral niet. en up-to-date was dit gebied zeker niet. dit ten nadele van de ontwikkeling in dit gebied. De Losse eindjes/segmenten mogen best weg. 

Ik doe mijn best om het goed te krijgen. Groet.
eggie (2026-01-20 12:31:57+00:00): Hoi,

Dat gebied dat niet renderde (coastline?)  heb ik aangepast naar heide.
Paar keer ctrl-f5 voor het effect.
Paden die nergens aan vast zaten heb ik doorverbonden. access=no heb ik verwijderd. De wandelroutes heb ik voorlopig hersteld. Mijn advies is om niet te veel in één keer aan te passen, want in het begin loop je al snel tegen je grenzen aan.
Het gaat al snel fout, Landuse overlap, paden op paden getekend, losse stukjes.
wandelroutes die niet onderbroken mogen worden.
Zelf stuur ik de welkomstberichten naar nieuwe mappers en doe de eerste screening,vandaar dat je van mij een reactie krijgt.
Wanneer je vragen heb stel ze gerust.
Kijk ook even goed naar de tips en links in de welkomstmail hoe te mappen.
Doe niet te veel in 1x en vraag evt om een review.
Er wordt je overigens niks kwalijk genomen als iets verkeerd gaat.
Mapse,
eggie
validator OSM
eggie (2026-01-20 12:36:30+00:00): Hier de wandelroutes zoals ze momenteel lopen.
Wanneer dat anders zou moeten.. laat maar weten.
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=15.0/52.2099/5.7921