piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TheSwavu (2025-08-02 00:38:40+00:00): It's not clear what "autofix" means here, but you've added another reference to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1800088617 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16692201 which is not valid.


Thanks.
❤️‍🔥 (2025-08-02 09:54:58+00:00): oops, thanks for fixing it. There is work underway at  https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/1538 to make iD warn users about errors like this
TheSwavu (2025-08-02 10:58:29+00:00): OK. Was just worried if you were running a script it might have needed a small change.

Cheers.
Leo Slager (2025-07-26 10:01:04+00:00): Hallo grentoe,
Je hebt hier het adres van het tijdelijke gemeentehuis gewijzigd. Dat kan natuurlijk niet dit POI is niet verplaatst en  het adres blijft het zelfde.

ik pas het even aan en ik verhuis het gemeentehuis naar de nieuwe locatie.
olimago (2025-07-31 09:26:09+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour ta contribution mais attention à respecter l'historique, ne pas créer de doublons et être sur de l'état du terrain.

Ici un nœud qui contenait déjà "Les cafetiers" existe et il a été passé en shop vacant il y a un moment. Voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4437685592/history

Si jamais c'était une erreur il vaut mieux réutiliser le noeud existant pour conserver l'historique et ne pas créer de doublon.
Dans ce cas ci "Les cafetiers" ne sont plus actifs (ils ont toujours la bannière du magasin, ce qui a pu induire en erreur en effet), il y a un nouveau café "Xaia" que je vais ajouter.

Merci, bonne continuation !
tbo47 (2025-07-31 10:33:10+00:00): Merci pour votre message. Et merci d'avoir corrige mon erreur.
Tjuro (2025-07-25 12:37:46+00:00): Hello Rensco,

Motorway restrictions are applied using motorway=yes/no. In this location this has been correctly applied.

I have fixed it for you.

Greetings,

Tjuro
Entbert (2025-07-25 14:56:58+00:00): Moin miguel-ka, das Aufteilen von Wegen ist nicht schwer: Auf die entsprechende Stelle einen Knoten setzen, mit rechter Maustaste anklicken und dann auf die Schere ("Teilen") drücken.
MapsBot (2026-04-12 22:45:46+00:00): El resultado es impresionante, un trabajo espectacular!! !
Derek Morr (2025-07-25 15:44:19+00:00): If you want to make the map better, I suggest focusing on adding the missing houses and address fields.
CtI5UDYpRmUS (2025-07-25 17:52:48+00:00): Driveway is the vaild type of object on OSM, you should respect anything mapped by other mappers. If you have no vaild reasons to remove something (e.g. duplicate;blantant graffile;features are no longer exist on reality), you shouldn't to remove anything mapped by other mappers. As obeying the principle of OSM, anyone can free to add anything on the ground while able to have verification of existence in reality, e.g. confirmed by the aerial images
Derek Morr (2025-07-26 00:34:13+00:00): Adding individual driveways for single-family houses is not beneficial -- it's just visual clutter and noise. It should not be on the map. Stop adding them. Stop reverting my edits.

If you want to actually improve OSM in the San Diego area, there are many areas with no buildings or missing address data. Focus on those.
Derek Morr (2025-07-26 00:36:00+00:00): For example, adding driveways to houses that aren't mapped (along Elkelton Boulevard, for example) is not remotely helpful.
CtI5UDYpRmUS (2025-07-26 08:07:12+00:00): Individual driveways are vaild objects, so called "visual clutter and noise."is just your subjevtive feel. If an area have detailed mapping, clutter is inevitable. To avoid clutter on the map you editing, please use object filter of editor you use to hide certain (or showing only certain ) type of objects

As the object meet "on the ground" rule of OSM and it mapped on license compatible on map, driveways should be allowed to added on OSM

There are no justified reason to ask me to stop adding or not to revert your deletion of my work

There are more than 8 million objects tagged with service=driveway in United States

https://dashboard.ohsome.org/#backend=ohsomeApi&groupBy=none&time=2025-07-01T12%3A00%3A00Z%2F2025-07-01T12%3A00%3A00Z%2FP1M&key=service&value=driveway&types=way&measure=count&adminids=-148838
Derek Morr (2025-07-26 15:37:18+00:00): Again, saying there are X of a thing is not a valid reply.

Adding driveways to no where is map vandalism.
CtI5UDYpRmUS (2025-07-27 04:19:27+00:00): Please read

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:service%3Ddriveway

It is a vaild type of geographic features and All of my driveways added to OSM is really exist in the reality, can validated by any aerial image, include Bing or Mapbox, hence, statement you said "Adding driveways to no where is map vandalism" is make no sense to me

Please respect other mappers. Just feel clogged or unnecessary is not the vaild rationale for remove/ask other not to map any vaild geographic features.
Derek Morr (2025-07-27 14:35:06+00:00): I am tired of repeating myself - adding driveways to nowhere does not add value to the map. Stop adding them. Stop reverting my edits. Stop vandalizing the map.
CtI5UDYpRmUS (2025-07-28 01:13:23+00:00): You are just repeating the nonsense and I have a vaild reason to oppose your statement

I don't have such thing as "adding driveways to nowhere", All information are according on the aerial Imagery such as Bing or Mapbox. If you don't believe authenticity of the aerial imagery and other map with similar data, you can take an on field survey to confirm the existence these driveways, and it is one kind of vaild object I have been said

Hence, your statement of "does not add value to the map" is make no sense. There is no any rationale to ask me stop adding them or stop reverting your edits that disresepct of other mapper(s). If I must say what is vandalizing the map, to remove the vaild object(s) without legitimate rationale is one kind of vandalizing .
woodpeck (2025-07-28 11:46:37+00:00): The Data Working Group has become aware of this dispute and is tracking it in Ticket#2025072810000334. Derek, I see that you have removed some of Ctl's driveways for the second time, and Ctl has restored them as many times. If you find yourself in a situation like that - involve the DWG or others, don't just continue deleting and restoring data because if anything is a waste of resources it is that!

I agree with with Derek that adding driveways that do not connect to a building (because the building has not been mapped) looks absolutely silly (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/32.708652/-117.017092) - it is a sight well suited to make others chuckle about what goes on in the heads of OSM contributors.

However, it is not against our rules and hence please don't delete Ctl's work. If you want you can raise the matter on community.openstreetmap.org ("Should we tolerate driveways when the associated buildings have not been mapped"), and if the community should then come to the consensus that mapping driveways without mapping the buildings they lead to is unwanted, then (and only then) can you remove such contributions in the future.
CtI5UDYpRmUS (2025-07-28 15:22:36+00:00): OK I agree

If any editor uses iD to avoid inconvenient at mapping that map seem clogging, please click "Map Data", then see "Map Features" section,  untick  
"Service Roads" or other kind of object you want to avoid the issue of inconvenient of mapping or worrying of distrubing other objects. 

If you use JOSM, you can download only certain type of objects via Overpass dialog, or use object filter.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API/Sparse_Editing

Incomplete map data coverage on OSM is common as there are too many vaild geographic features not mapped yet. Showing only driveways only and nothing else mapped is merely of incomplete data but not a mere reason to remove someone's vaild work as long as not violate the rule of OSM and existed in reality
CtI5UDYpRmUS (2025-07-28 16:00:01+00:00): And I have some additional words:

I disagree with saying of 
"adding driveways that do not connect to a building merely because building is not mapped or ever existed is not what "silly" or
"chuckle". Driveway is a vaild objects showed on the map, unlike any mapping error or bad import (object with useless or strange  tags don't provide useful information; untagged orphaned nodes due to mapping or upload error; duplicate objects; objects that not  exist in reality...) make the objects invaild and in such manner mapper can free to remove them or asking original mapper about the mapping error issues.

If you have other comment or opinion, please feel free to raise an issue on community.openstreetmap.org
CtI5UDYpRmUS (2025-07-28 16:44:13+00:00): Example of the driveways were mapped at the area which no any or little buildings are mapped as now

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/28FR
Derek Morr (2025-07-29 01:42:47+00:00): @ctl - You've never made an argument why you think adding driveways to unmapped houses is useful. You just keep repeating that because driveways exist that they should be added to the map (this isn't an argument OSM accepts; there are plenty of things that should not be mapped).

Why do you add them? What benefit do you think they provide?

Also, the driveways often intersect with Microsoft's open buildings datasets; this causes validation errors when I add the houses.
CtI5UDYpRmUS (2025-07-29 02:43:39+00:00): @Derek Morr 
What is your definition of "useful"? It is the subject sense as the term "useful" have multiple definition and every person have different sense of how the online information is useful or not. Your feel of not useful is not mean it is objective not useful.

To determine what useful or not, please think the core question:Why we need have the such thing as map? Map is the tool to provide the accurate geographic information, include driveway, in the sense, mapping driveways or anything exist in ground is useful:provide the real geographic information

This thought answer the question of "why you think adding driveways to unmapped houses is useful"? 

It's simple:It is the real geographic information, represent the existence in reality, if mapping trees, ponds, swimming pools, walls, or other objects existed you may feel not useful, it is still useful by providing the accurate geographic information represent the reality, this core thought also meet "on the ground" principles of OSM

Regarding on your another question:driveway that intersect on house you added and gave you the validation error, the solution also simple:Either dragging the nodes of driveway out of building you added, or just ignore such warning if you feel too much burden to you as the driveway not far exceed into building, such "validation error" won't prevent you from upload your work of adding houses that intersect with driveways, and I can help fix the intersect between driveways and houses.(I mapped them according to the aerial imagerys, so where driveway terminates I can clearly know)
MikeN (2025-07-29 02:44:05+00:00): The primary purpose of OSM is to create geo data for consumers to use, not to display a map, although many consumes use it to display a map.   If they consider driveways to be a clutter, they will not display them.  Many other types objects are being added that could equally be questioned such as turning circles, nonexistent floor levels, and road signs.  Why include the entire length of terminating roads even before there are any houses?   Much of today's OSM data seems like extra overhead, but I've been surprised in the past when something that seems to be useless suddenly has value.  
Adding buildings to busy areas has always required conflict resolution to make the new building coexist with existing land cover, land use, water features, sidewalks, and other buildings.
Derek Morr (2025-07-29 02:48:02+00:00): Ctl - are you actually going to answer the question, or just continue to evade it and play word games?
CtI5UDYpRmUS (2025-07-29 05:50:51+00:00): Map is not about aesthetic, but provides accurate geographic information, in fact, there are many objects which OSM standard layers doesn't to renders (include railway switches, railway signals, building:part=* objects, water wells, or more), if the map have enough detailed geographic information, clutter is inevitable, and anyone if consider driveways or someone type of objects feel clutter which hard to use, they can use or design the map rendering engine to not to render such objects, when editing, use object filter or download only certain kind of objects to avoid clutter.

Thank to the high resolution of aerial imagery and precisely position in the USA, there are no concern of misaligned between different kinds of objects which happen frequent in other countries (e.g. building that span over the roads even water areas), beside driveways mapping, I have done a lot of work to realign the road as some roads even being offset too far that exceed roadside in the aerial imagery, or other aligning issues.
woodpeck (2025-07-29 08:07:44+00:00): @Ctl, don't put blind trust in aerial imagery in the US, it can be misaligned like everywhere else (eg you'll find an offset between Bing and Esri in this particular area). @Derek, while I, too, wonder what drives Ctl to map the way they do, they don't have to explain. Driveways are "a thing" in OSM, even though where I live we tend to use them only for "non-obvious" cases where to reach a building the method "park on the public road in the spot that is nearest to the building" does not yield good results. Ctl seems to add driveways even where they add little information, but MikeN is right - maybe someone comes along and wants to calculate what percentage of ground is asphalted or so and then they are happy to have this info. 

It appears that Ctl is using Mapbox satellite imagery which in this area appears to have an almost identical alignment to Bing; therefore I am surprised to hear that adding buildings from Microsoft's data set causes overlaps. This is perhaps a matter that deserves a closer look; if either Mapbox or Microsoft are so misaligned then it would be good to apply some correction when using these sources.
Derek Morr (2025-07-29 11:24:12+00:00): So to clarify - that's a no. You have no justification for adding these driveways to the map other than "they're there." No use case, nothing. Gotcha.

Again, I will strongly suggest that you stop doing this. There are many problems with OSM in the San Diego area - missing and incomplete addresses, missing and out-of-date business information, missing sidewalks, turning restrictions, etc. Adding any of these would have immediate benefit for daily navigation use cases.

With that, I've wasted enough time on this issue.
CtI5UDYpRmUS (2025-07-29 12:50:52+00:00): @Derek Morr
OSM is not your own site, please respect any other mappers, you have no justification or legitimate reason to ask me to stop mapping driveways or other vaild objects that meet "on the ground" rule of OSM. What your claim of "No use case" or nothing, you didn't provide the evidence of why mapping driveways just some sort of nonsense or invaild objects. Just be really existence and verifiable is already enough to mapping on OSM like all other real geographic information on OSM.

There are many problems with OSM in the San Diego area need to be fixed, and there are lack of many accurate geographic infornation mapped, but these sitation is not the rationale to ask me stop mapping of driveways.

You should focus on your own contributions, include missing addresses, business information, sidewalks, turning restrictions that you mentioned, stop the repeated comment which have already replied by me. I have my own way to contributions on OSM, please respect me.
mapperaid (2025-07-30 11:45:22+00:00): Странно выглядят ваши правки. Вы изменили тэги в OSM, чтобы у кого-то продукт по-другому строил маршрутизацию? Это в корне не правильно. Если вам нужно исправлять маршрутизацию, вносите доработки в ваш продукт, но не коверкайте OSM. Здесь стройкой помечаются долгостроящиеся участки дорог. Текущий ремонт, завершаемый в течение года, согласно правил, не помечается в картах. Так как различные сервисы берут данные с OSM раз в пару лет, то в них дорога может оказаться перекрытой годами, в то время как ремонт завершен за пару месяцев. Более того, вы помечаете Льва Толстого от Садыгалиева до Манаса как перекрытую на ремонт, что не соответствует действительности.
Anas masuris (2025-07-26 22:08:53+00:00): Hej, świetna robota. Jeśli chcesz, edycję można jeszcze dopieścić o bardziej specyficzne oznakowanie (tagi) i obiekty (typu wskaźniki i semafory):

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:OpenRailwayMap/Tagging_in_Poland

Serdecznie zachęcam!
lukabułka (2025-07-27 14:25:51+00:00): Coś tam dodałem, nie za dużo bo nie mam zbyt wielu zdjęć
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169561912
Frank Peng (2026-01-21 07:03:19+00:00): It would probably be better to wait for updated aerial imagery or check for any updated aerial imagery before mapping newly built roads.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169455727
gurglypipe (2025-07-25 14:10:15+00:00): Hiya, thanks for your edits around Kendal recently. Why are you deleting parking aisles? Have the car parks been rearranged since the aerial imagery was updated? Ta
spiregrain (2025-07-25 16:11:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM!  Saw your discussion on the forum - thanks for following-up and making the edits!  Not sure how long it'll take for this change to make it's way into your bike computer.
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-26 05:51:58+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
MaliMrav (2025-08-07 08:13:55+00:00): Zdravo,

Promena imena ulice je urađena polovično, pa sad imamo izmešane nazive:

int_name=Branka Miljkovica
name=Жарка Ђурића
name:sr=Бранка Миљковића
name:sr-Latn=Žarka Đurića

Da li biste mogli da sredite da nazivi budu konzistentni?

Hvala.
cyberatlas (2025-08-13 07:59:26+00:00): Ta relacja jest zepsuta, trzeba ją naprawić
albheim (2025-08-07 07:53:52+00:00): Hi, just a heads-up — it looks like Avenue Duguay-Trouin may have been accidentally flipped in this changeset. I’ve recently corrected it back based on local observation and signage. Thanks for your other edits in the area!
GeorgeKaplan (2025-08-07 19:51:37+00:00): Not an accident, I walked there and took note of the sign. Anyway, maybe I was wrong.
albheim (2025-08-07 20:33:34+00:00): Okay, no worries. I'll leave my change in as my current observations have the cars and signage pointing to the south-east direction. Hope that is all good with you.
silversurfer83 (2025-07-26 20:02:29+00:00): Hi there :)

can anyone use these?

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169457428
YomanNH (2025-07-26 20:42:40+00:00): Znowu tworzysz fikcję?
YomanNH (2025-07-31 19:39:36+00:00): Tak jak poprzednio - wybrałem się na miejsce, sprawdziłem i poprawiłem samodzielnie te bzdury, które zmapowałeś, bo bym się nie doczekał Twojej reakcji. Bicycle=designated będzie tam wtedy, gdy będą odpowiednie znaki.
Hidden Mountain (2025-07-25 17:35:17+00:00): Есть какие-то доказательства существования мостов в последние годы? Если нет, то я буду вынужден удалить тропу как объект, приводящий в заблуждение легкости переправы в местах, где это невозможно.
one_half_3544 (2025-07-26 16:49:01+00:00): Там же написано source=survey
Люди ходили два дня назад.
Hidden Mountain (2025-07-26 17:07:20+00:00): Если эти люди ходили на Талгар с Ершатом, то стоит знать: 1) переход реки был по поваленному дереву, которое вынесло во время селя.
2) На этом дереве несколько лет назад был срыв девушки, поиски тела закончились в коллекторе в Талгарской плотине.
3) Люди, ходившие там еще при рабочем лагере, говорят, что мостов там никогда не было и все ходили по одному берегу, пока сель этот берег не разрушил.

Исходя из всей информации, я считаю не целесообразно указывать наличие мостов. И даже бродов в этих опасных местах.
one_half_3544 (2025-07-27 15:31:05+00:00): Я не знаю кто такой Ершат, но мосты построенные, а не просто бревно
https://ibb.co/hxsNnHYH
Hidden Mountain (2025-07-27 15:48:26+00:00): Ваша ссылка не открывается
one_half_3544 (2025-07-27 15:56:29+00:00): https://tinypic.host/image/3yE02
Hidden Mountain (2025-07-27 16:02:18+00:00): Открыл. Значит у меня была не вся информация и НС случился на мосту, а не бревне. Ок, тогда сейчас восстановлю их, туристам там гулять запрещено, а вот работникам разной сферы могут быть полезны.
Taksine (2025-12-31 14:19:14+00:00): Please do not write in English in China
custodiankeyy (2025-07-25 21:39:48+00:00): I've edited the area again, please check if there's a problem.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169477473
NeisBot (2025-07-25 14:51:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
thedumbchild (2025-07-25 15:18:13+00:00): Looking for delicious food any time of the day or night? Fishermens Restaurant is your go-to destination! We proudly serve a wide variety of Seafood, Vegetarian, Indian, Chinese, Tandoori, Dosas, and Idli dishes in a casual, welcoming atmosphere that’s perfect for families and friends alike.

Whether you're craving spicy Indian curries, flavorful Chinese stir-fries, smoky tandoori delights, or South Indian favorites like crispy dosas and soft idlis – we have something for everyone. Our family-friendly environment, fresh ingredients, and fast, friendly service make every meal memorable.

Dine in, take away, or order online – we’re open 24 hours a day to satisfy your cravings around the clock!
NeisReview (2025-07-27 09:44:52+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/169547756
amosharper (2025-07-25 14:53:20+00:00): (Don't beat me up for invading your turf, Bexhill-OSM).
Kris74M (2026-01-24 14:25:42+00:00): Rafał, nie usuwaj nazwy z "miejsce zatrzymania autobusu" na przystankach, bo relatify nie pobiera wtedy tych węzłów do trasy linii autobusowej.
I nie przesuwaj przystanków na bus_bay lub ulice.
felipeeugenio (2025-07-25 15:04:14+00:00): Note	Contributor	Tmstmp UTC	Action	Comment
4874149 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-25 16:30	closed	ok
4874147 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-25 16:30	closed	ok
4874150 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-25 16:29	closed	ok
4874151 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-25 16:27	closed	ok
4874152 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-25 16:26	closed	ok
4874154 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-25 16:26	closed	ok
4874153 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-25 16:25	closed	ok
4874156 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-25 16:23	closed	ok
4874146 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-25 16:21	closed	ok
osmviborg (2025-07-25 15:16:20+00:00): Please don't tag buildings with addresses. In DK addresses are kept on nodes only.
Please don't modify/move/add address nodes. Addresses in Denmark are imported from an official database and maintained automatically. Thank You.
hansian (2025-07-25 16:14:02+00:00): @Geim 👍
43567uniqueusername (2025-07-25 15:21:58+00:00): 14-A hattına duraklar eklendi
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-25 15:21:23+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13023010250

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀