piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
literan (2023-12-19 17:12:32+00:00): СДЭК все же не пункт выдачи товаров, а полноценное почтовое отделение, где можно сделать отправление. Обычно его как post_office отмечают (это обсуждали на форуме)
Baloo Uriza (2023-12-18 20:18:44+00:00): I'm not sure this one quite deserved an upgrade?  Feels more like a side street than a neighborhood thoroughfare.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145264814
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-18 20:00:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11429632812
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11429580868
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11429580867
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232248491
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232248492

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-18 20:00:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1209746092

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-18 20:10:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/194238628
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/534201388
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908663583

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-11 04:03:44+00:00): poprawiono
janolezab (2025-01-31 20:00:31+00:00): Der Charkiw-Park muss keine Multipolygon-Relation sein, oder?
VLD549 (2024-01-30 16:17:33+00:00): Hi, it seems to be called Kerklaan, Amstelveen.
Could you indicate what source was used for the name you suggested?  
I used https://9292.nl/amstelveen/bushalte-kerklaan.

Thank you.
A67-A67 (2024-01-30 17:09:23+00:00): The existing stop positions...
A67-A67 (2024-01-30 17:10:44+00:00): And the bus stop is named Kerklaan after my edit, so I don't understand your comment at all
VLD549 (2024-05-13 15:28:11+00:00): Thank you.
m2fc (2024-01-05 22:54:21+00:00): Olá,
a subestação foi desmontada com a central termoelétrica e não parece ter equipamentos a não ser suportes e cabos deixados para trás. faz sentido manter a área como subestação? pelo menos mudar o nome para "antiga" não?
m2fc (2024-01-05 23:04:42+00:00): Reparei agora que usou a tag disused mas pela descrição da mesma, não me parece que se encaixe neste contexto pois faltam equipamentos e boa parte da infraestrutura. Diria que o que faz mais sentido será a área não existir de todo.
dmfr (2024-02-07 12:53:42+00:00): Olá! Sim é verdade, a subestação está quase totalmente desmantelada. No entanto, as linhas elétricas que ligam esta antiga subestação à subestação de Setúbal ainda existem fisicamente, além de ainda constarem nos registos da EDP. Proponho adicionar "Antiga" ao nome da subestação, além de trocar power=substation por disused:power=substation. Não mudava mais nada além disso.

Cumprimentos, e obrigado pelo feedback!
JuanjoMC (2023-12-19 08:15:49+00:00): Hi,

in this changeset you set the name and ref of this box
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11423199820
to Loossens - JT18. 
This is not correct, the JT18 box is located nearby, here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=50.87845&mlon=4.33560#map=19/50.87845/4.33560
This one is a new box that seems to have been installed recently, I had put a note on the changeset stating it: "Seems to have been recently installed, no REF sticker and not yet visible on cycloparking.brussels website"

Cheers
StefDeGreef (2023-12-19 08:18:46+00:00): Thanks !
Trevor_1 (2023-12-18 21:00:28+00:00): *español
HellMap (2023-12-18 22:33:12+00:00): Hello,

Has this path really been recently removed? It was still there mid-November after most of the works were finished. It snowed soon after, so it seems unlikely something else was done here.

Thanks
richlv (2024-01-03 17:47:53+00:00): Heya, any thoughts on this, was it indeed removed?
HellMap (2024-01-03 18:15:53+00:00): Oh, I restored in 1223789629. It's still there as of 20 Dec. It's basically a deadend sidewalk. I haven't left a comment because my Mapillary is stuck processing and I cannot link to it.
richlv (2024-01-03 18:27:14+00:00): Thanks, perhaps railing is still there, too?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145267101
HellMap (2024-01-03 18:33:34+00:00): The railing along the road is mostly gone. Only the angled part that is currently mapped remains.
richlv (2024-01-03 19:17:32+00:00): Great, thank you for the confirmation.
Peremenov (2024-01-03 20:00:14+00:00): Hello!
I can send a photo of the place. The railing has been removed for sure.
Peremenov (2024-01-03 20:02:29+00:00): https://ibb.co/nPLR4SW
Peremenov (2024-01-03 20:04:30+00:00): Here is a bit different angle
https://ibb.co/BnSPq2s
richlv (2024-01-03 20:20:43+00:00): Excellent, thank you so much for the pictures and the great updates.

BTW, there's a Latvian community chat at https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com , if you aren't there yet.
Peremenov (2024-01-03 20:31:09+00:00): I guess this is roadside and can be considered as a part of the road (that's why I removed it) and nobody actually uses it for walk since there is a proper path nearby 🤷‍♂️
Also it starts
Peremenov (2024-01-03 20:31:27+00:00): Thank you for the link :)
Peremenov (2024-01-03 20:34:09+00:00): ... also it begins and ends suddenly into the soil
HellMap (2024-01-03 21:43:37+00:00): Thanks!

This location is fairly detailed, so including sidewalks as separate ways is generally preferred. At least, you shouldn't remove sidewalks once they are drawn. This one is admittedly a useless one, but it still exists, is not like the surrounding grass, has a kerb and the service road crosses it (technically, pedestrians have right of way). So it's still information, even if it's not exactly high priority.
fititnt (2023-12-21 00:48:22+00:00): Olá! Seja bem vindo!

para testes, use o https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ . As contas de usuário são separadas, e aquele servidor pode ser usado para testes (porém note que lá os dados depois de um tempo são deletados, por isso só testes mesmo lá)

A edição que fez no https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11429929309 está em produção, então como são dados de teste, o ideal é apagar.

Qualquer dúvida, comente aqui, ou entre no Telegram to OpenStreetMap Rio Grande do Sul (link https://t.me/osmrs )
RedMacryon (2023-12-19 13:36:42+00:00): Meines Wissens is das die lokale Schaltstelle des Internetzugangs / Verteilers der A1 Austria und ist seit ca 2018 ein permanent errichtete Einrchtung. Warum für dies ein Container und kein ordentliches Gebäude errichtet wurde ist mir leider auch nicht bekannt.

Würde es aber nicht entfernen, da es eigentlich ein essentieller Teil der Infrastruktur hier ist
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145267709
sushifan (2023-12-20 09:03:39+00:00): Hallo RedMacryon, die A1 Container habe ich nicht gelöscht, die gibt es nach wie vor. Was ich gelöscht habe, war ein Gebäude, das das ganze Grundstück dargestellt hat. Da ich aber keinen zutreffenden "landuse" Wert gefunden habe (z.B. wäre landuse=infrastructure ein Vorschlag), habe ich eben dieses "Grundstücksgebäude", das natürlich KEIN Gebäude ist, gelöscht.
RedMacryon (2023-12-20 13:19:12+00:00): Okay, na dann sollte das eigentlich korrekt sein, Ich markiers als passabel
eggie (2023-12-18 21:47:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Tip.. Je hoeft aan reguliere straten geen oneway=no toe te voegen. Dat is default.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Glassman (2023-12-19 20:13:23+00:00): #TIP: the polygon for the waste water treatment plant should encompass the entire plant. I went ahead and made the change.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145268046
RedMacryon (2023-12-19 13:39:33+00:00): Beides halb halb fraglich, da hier weder ein Zebrastreifen noch ein deutlich markierter Übergang ist (also kein crossing in meinen Augen), aber der Weg is eigentlich auch nicht hier...also effektiv ended eigentlich der Gehsteig und beginnt neu auf der anderen Seite.

Ich würde es aber auch als "sidewalk" lassen um ehrlich zu sein, das dies am meisten Sinn macht.

Die Änderung von "path" zu "footway" ist in meinen Augen ein Synonym Ding -> irrelevant
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145268609
sushifan (2023-12-20 09:07:52+00:00): Hallo RedMacryon, habe den path auf footway geändert, weil osmose meckert, dass es einen footway=sidewalk gibt, aber keinen highway=footway. Ich werde diesen Fall auch im Forum darlegen.
RedMacryon (2023-12-20 13:20:05+00:00): Okay ja alles klar
eggie (2023-12-19 07:19:48+00:00): Dag Milan..
Een highway=path is ook fietsbaar.
Het wordt in de routers wel gezien als onverhard.
Daarom graag toevoegen surface=..... ? paving_stones, asphalt e.d.
Ook bicycle=yes of no is nuttig.

Een cycleway wordt altijd als verhard gezien. 

MVG
eggie
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-29 04:36:27+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15531
NeisBot (2024-01-03 00:19:23+00:00): Hi Austin Wilder 👋

your recent changeset has been marked due to a temporary or permanent block from further map edits. 

If you have any questions or if there's anything you'd like to discuss regarding the mapping, feel free to reach out! We're here to help. 

Best regards, 🤖

Details https://osm.org/user_blocks/15541
#ContributorHasBeenBlocked
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:36:39+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146013252
ManuelB701 (2023-12-20 08:32:42+00:00): Hallo Hugo.

Bei der Umleitung hast du die ganzen Relationen kaputt gemacht, wo die ganzen Reihenfolgen durcheinander gebracht worden sind.
Die habe ich (so gut es geht) behoben mit Ausnahme des AirLiners und Busses H (Kesselhutweg => Anne-Frank-Straße), dessen Verlauf am Hauptbahnhof man vor Ort nochmal überprüfen soll.

Liebe Grüße
Manuel
geisthugo123 (2023-12-20 17:47:10+00:00): Was meinst du mit Reihenfolgen?
ManuelB701 (2023-12-21 06:20:43+00:00): Die Idee ist, dass Relationen in OSM sich nicht nur um Datengruppen handeln sondern eine Listen von Daten sind d.h. es gibt innerhalb der Relationen eine Reihenfolge von Elementen.
Karten wie die ÖPNVKarte nutzen hierbei die Reihenfolge der Elemente in den Listen, um den exakten Fahrtverlauf (z.B. Richtungspfeile) zu berechnen, welche ansonsten falsch dargestellt werden.

Allerdings muss man auch sagen, dass iD wirklich nicht für Routen gedacht ist. Als ich beim letzten mal eine Route in iD hinzugefügt habe (Bus 69 in Mainz über Nackenheim), so habe ich zwar einerseits die Reihenfolge für die Gegenrichtung sowie einigen Straßen nicht beachtet, vielmehr aber ist es viel schwieriger, diese Liste dann dort zu korrigieren, da man die Elemente einzeln manuell verschieben muss und nicht immer ist die gewünschte Relation sichtbar.
Ich empfehle dir Routen mit JOSM zu bearbeiten, da dessen Relationseditor viel mächtiger ist (z.B. großflächiges Verschieben der Mitglieder, Verdrehen der Relationsmitglieder) und sogar anzeigt, ob der Verlauf tatsächlich durchgehend ist oder nicht.
AnnaCatarina (2025-10-28 12:43:25+00:00): Hello Matheus,
why did You change the gauge of the metric system of FTL (https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrovia_Transnordestina_Log%C3%ADstica) into 1600 mm?
Regards,
Anna Catarina
Matheus Moreira CE (2025-10-28 17:30:21+00:00): Olá, tudo bem? O nome "Ferrovia Transnordestina" mostrado no mapa se refere ao nome da ferrovia, e não da empresa que a administra. A Ferrovia Transnordestina é uma ferrovia em construção administrada pela TLSA (Transnordestina Logística S.A.)
Apesar dos nomes serem idênticos, a FTL (Ferrovia Transnordestina Logística) não administra essa ferrovia, e sim, uma outra bem mais antiga.
Resumo: 
Ferrovia Transnordestina 1600mm - TLSA
Linha Sul do Ceará 1000mm - FTL
https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnordestina_Log%C3%ADstica_S.A.

Sei que é um pouco complexo de entender no começo, mas estou à disposição. Obrigado!
AnnaCatarina (2025-10-29 13:36:58+00:00): Hello Matheus,
thanks for answering.
I think, the new 1600 mm railway should be named "Nova Transnordestina", while the old 1000 mm could be "FV Transnordestina" to make it easier to separate them.
Btw... do You have sources about stopping passenger service and later freight trains on the ramal to Crato?
Regards,
Anna Catarina
voteforpedro (2023-12-19 23:21:27+00:00): You're on it! Nice job
borkymorky (2023-12-18 22:38:52+00:00): this is based on a gpx track
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-02 10:03:47+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292245907/history has maxspeed:source = sign that was added in this edit
is it intentionally used instead of source:maxspeed=sign ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Asource%3Amaxspeed%3Dsign

maxspeed:type is also sometimes used as a key for such data, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:type
ginnyTheCat (2025-12-21 20:37:28+00:00): Yea idk what I was doing there. I think I mixed it up with source:maxspeed=sign. Whoops, thx for catching that.
Kai Johnson (2025-02-16 18:10:20+00:00): Nice work on the alignment of Quackenbush Mine Road!
Elizen (2024-01-31 14:36:47+00:00): Здравствуйте. Хотела обратиться к вам насчёт правок данных объектов: https://osm.org/way/1193645214 и https://osm.org/way/209111776
Они не являются населёнными пунктами, поэтому place=hamlet там точно быть не должно. Также в теге name не следует помимо названия добавлять некие пояснения. Тогда уж лучше их прописывать отдельно в теге note. Собственно поэтому ранее я внесла свои правки в name, удалив приписку "(нежил.)" и place=hamlet заменила на abandoned:place=hamlet, но вы решили всё вернуть к первоначальному варианту
Frans S (2023-12-19 11:21:22+00:00): See my PM direct to you.
Best regards
eggie (2023-12-19 10:42:51+00:00): Dag R0m  Je vraagt feedback.. Je combineertr adressen, maar waarom zou je dat doen?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145270963

Wat heeft nummer 3 met nr 12 te maken? en waarom 12 en 13 gecombineerd. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-12-19 10:44:34+00:00): Adresnode 16 heb je helemaal verwijderd. Toen de Gall en Gall sloot hield toen ook het adres op te bestaan?
eggie (2023-12-19 10:49:51+00:00): Adres 16 hersteld.. Bakkerij op nr 3 gezet.
De wibra moet je maar even kijken op wel nr die hoort. .. 
Gr eggie
Filip009 (2023-12-19 15:44:25+00:00): Zdravím, vďaka za prispievanie do OpenStreetMap.

Si si istý, že daný obchod má v prenájme celú budovu? Pokiaľ má obchod len malú prevádzku je lepšie vytvoriť bod a informácie pridať na bod a z budovy, kde boli pridané ich odstrániť.

Pokiaľ máš ďalšie otázky neváhaj kontaktovať slovenskú OSM komunitu https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk
eggie (2023-12-19 07:07:16+00:00): Dag Milan  Je voetpad heeft geen verbinding meer met een ander pad.
Een paaltje staat eigenlijk nooit op een kruising.
Waar hoort dat paaltje?
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145269365

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-12-19 07:12:56+00:00): Paadje doorverbonden..  paaltje verplaatst. motor_vehicle=no hoef je niet te taggen op een paaltje.

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2023-12-19 07:15:23+00:00): En dat gaat dan over deze changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145269365#map=19/52.23396/4.81164
eggie (2023-12-19 07:28:11+00:00): Algemeen surface paved toegevoegd .. Je zou evt specifiek kunnen taggen.
Nu routeert het weer voor fietsers. highway=path wordt als onverhard gezien.
gr eggie
Milanleeft (2023-12-19 14:05:38+00:00): Dank voor het meedenken! Volgens mij staat alles dan nu netjes. Ik zal de tips meenemen.

Gr Milan
tyfi (2023-12-19 00:56:39+00:00): I also added stop signs and the bridge deck with MoDOT reference code.
I-76 (2023-12-20 15:04:15+00:00): The reason this changeset is so short is because I was showing somebody how Rapid works.
tyfi (2023-12-19 01:42:32+00:00): I also added ref: to the stretch of road under I-70 here. Previously it was mapped using ref:forward and ref:backward, and I understand why, but data consumers want the route designation in the plain ref tag afaict.

This bumps into a semantic point about where specifically a route begins and ends. Route signs are great until they're not, and sometimes they're really not. The MoDOT Transportation Management Center opines that there's technically a concurrency between J and O under the overpass, though, which connects each supplemental route to the opposing interstate ramp, so that's what I'm going with.

I am open to suggestions here about the route termini, but I think a single coherent "ref" tag is still important in 2023/4.
tyfi (2023-12-19 02:19:48+00:00): Large bbox due to U.S. 36 relation being touched
Supaplex (2023-12-19 03:47:51+00:00): 你要真的存在才能加上去，任何非真實存在的事物將被移除
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145273276
emersonveenstra (2023-12-20 13:41:49+00:00): Hi there,

You created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232306853#map=18/32.98674/-112.97289 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232306847#map=18/32.99849/-112.77444 with no tags, could you please go back and tag them? Thanks!
BubbaJuice (2023-12-20 15:21:08+00:00): Thanks for catching that I just fixed it
Supaplex (2023-12-19 03:46:48+00:00): 這裡不是模擬城市，請貢獻「真實」存在的事物，有牽涉主觀意識的不宜上傳
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145273584
SpinOff (2023-12-19 20:27:53+00:00): Hej. To że edycja jest w Barwinku widać, bo wyświetlają się elementy mapy które modyfikowałeś. Do opisu changesetu dodaj króciutki co to była za edycja.
StreetSurveyor (2023-12-19 03:18:20+00:00): https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5bc4b01911f7846611b864f1/t/64c18d4052630424650983b0/1690406209269/Island-Cemetery-Map_v6-7-23.pdf
BlumleinPear (2024-06-23 06:21:53+00:00): I've removed the cycle path you added along Cpt Cook Highway as it is already mapped within the trunk road using tags. Ordinarily lanes (vehicles/bicycles/taxis/buses) that are not physically separated do not have dedicated routable ways. Here is some info but not all: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway#Dedicated_cycle_lanes
TuAmigoElEditor (2023-12-19 20:44:23+00:00): Hola. En Openstreetmap no se usan abreviaciones en las vías como "Jr." o "Av.", se recomienda escribir el prefijo completo de la vía, ya sea Jirón, Calle o Avenida.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA/Convenciones
Saludos
gscholz (2023-12-21 08:15:18+00:00): Hi SUMAYYA 23,
your recent edits have left behind several errors regarding duplicate nodes, self intersecting lines and missing building tags:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=30.62740&lat=-2.62128&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145274868

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
hoserab (2023-12-24 21:24:44+00:00): Hello ContraBand,

I presume you got the land ownership info you aded in this changeset from a Mountain View County map. It shouldn't be presented in the `name=*` key,  'name' should only be used for the name of the feature in question. I.e. you mapped farmland with `name=DALEY, R VAN TIGHEM, T`, but that farmer's field is not *named* "DALEY, R VAN TIGHEM, T". That's not what you *call* the field itself. Know what I mean?

That said I think you've tangentially brought up something worth talking about at greater length, which is the appropriateness of adding the names of land owners to the map itself. I have started a discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/names-of-land-owners/107411. I'd love if you would participate in that discussion.

Thanks!
jmarchon (2023-12-19 06:24:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
mcliquid (2023-12-19 13:45:52+00:00): Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
mcliquid (2023-12-19 13:46:05+00:00): Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
12caracteres (2024-05-21 15:33:37+00:00): Hello,

Sorry for my late reply, and thank you for your instructive link. You're right, I was not aware of these recommendations. From now on, I'll be careful with my future changesets.

Best regards
Anonimowy123 (2023-12-19 09:37:45+00:00): Cześć, dziękuję za poprawę mojego błędu.
IreuN (2023-12-19 20:31:38+00:00): Chyba tu jeszcze trochę drogi powinno być oznaczone jako łącznik
Dawid2849 (2023-12-19 22:03:40+00:00): Gdzie?
arjunaraoc (2023-12-20 01:18:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). You may like to add rail=electrified  to the other metroline as well. It is better to make buildings with 90 degree corners(orthognal).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145279239
Jonathan Ng@ (2023-12-20 10:09:27+00:00): 你小修改能否别整那么大块😁
Patrickov (2023-12-21 06:28:23+00:00): 回楼上，他没办法呀，这改动动了廈门大学的关系，当中有一个已有成员在马来西亚。他最多只可以看清楚、讲清楚
tastrax (2023-12-19 10:40:52+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
tastrax (2023-12-19 23:07:58+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
literan (2023-12-19 17:06:42+00:00): зачем вы рисуете еще здания поверх уже отрисованных зданий?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100054550#map=18/55.81201/37.73591

??
MarinaKuzko (2023-12-20 13:13:18+00:00): Исправлено