piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
EBSerKartler (2026-01-05 15:11:52+00:00): Yes, even I searched the history out of curiosity and found that this strange name had been there since 2013. And, maybe even more interesting: This change "Kent" -> "Kante" was done only for the ceremonial county, not for the other county instances.

Nevertheless, "Kent" is just "Kent" even in German (I am native speaker of German).
lamms (2026-02-16 09:02:54+00:00): Semicolon separated `ref=` is the correct way to tag platforms that are physically the same platform that are "logically" separated by the transit authority (e.g. by having one side be one 6 and another platform be platform 7). Perth train station has been tagged this way for almost 10 years.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178617930
Shrinks99 (2026-01-10 02:57:36+00:00): Teeeeeeeechnically it is used for busses.

But yeah sure okay... I'm going to continue getting these ready and untag the line as "construction" but I'll keep all the stops "disused" for now.
Jarek 🚲 (2026-01-10 04:09:56+00:00): Yeah, and we mapped the bus stops https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13228866246/history/1

but it's not an active train station, so no railway=station
ralley (2026-01-05 23:59:43+00:00): Please do not delete an item just to re-add it with minor edits as it loses the history.  Rather edit the original
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176864709
Nater Kane (2026-01-26 21:23:49+00:00): I went through here Aug 2024 and don't remember having much issue navigating. The trace is here https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Nater%20Kane/traces/12175290
parkinthepark (2026-01-27 14:37:29+00:00): I think that's the wrong trace- the area in this changeset is further southeast. It covers a trail marked with survey flags between Nun's Run and Forest Glen Trail (Way 1455164999) that gets enough use that I'd call it "Informal". It roughly connects with a red-blazed trail (1457177951) between Nun's Run and Nun's Trail that I've labelled as "abandoned" because it's not maintained or regularly used.
parkinthepark (2026-01-27 14:39:30+00:00): Correction, I got the way #'s reversed  in that comment. way/1457177951 is the one with white survey flags, way/1455164999 is the abandoned red trail.
StefDeGreef (2026-01-10 09:50:07+00:00): The use of "intermittent water" for the west baray is incorrect as more than half of it is under water all year long. Please revert.
Serge Grusenmeyer (2026-01-10 15:53:20+00:00): I did not fill this in at all. I only added some additional documentation.
StefDeGreef (2026-01-14 01:02:38+00:00): You deleted the tags for the actual area of water and added intermittent for the whole area - I'll revert so it actually reflects ground reality : water to the west, ricefield to the east. Also it appears the information you copy-pasted from a private website, which isn't the official website for the structure.

See the change you made to the water area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/995153069/history/5

As much as contributions are rare and much valued in Cambodia
GeoMechain (2026-01-16 09:11:53+00:00): I am also in favour of a revert.
Furthermore, it is commonly accepted that the name should be in the language of the country (and its Khmer alphabet, not the transcription into the Latin alphabet).
GeoMechain (2026-01-16 09:19:12+00:00): Also the license if very unclear
BubbaJuice (2026-02-08 19:11:10+00:00): Please don't remove operators and names such as you did here. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19787483/history#map=18/32.502089/-111.294909

Thanks
Olyon (2026-02-08 22:45:59+00:00): The operator and the name are on the power plant which includes the solar panels and batteries.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20050382
NeisBot (2026-01-06 05:16:42+00:00): 🌍 Bienvenue sur OSM, dorq1987.
Merci de contribuer !

Pour faciliter la collaboration et aider les autres à comprendre tes modifications, il est préférable d'ajouter une courte description des changements que tu as effectués. Des commentaires clairs aident la communauté à suivre ton travail et à fournir des retours plus précis. Tu peux trouver des conseils pour écrire de bons commentaires ici[1].

✅ Voici un exemple de commentaire basé sur tes modifications de carte : "Ajout des détails d'adresse, y compris la rue, le numéro de maison, la ville, le code postal et le nom"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, dorq1987.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added address details, including street, house number, city, postcode, and name"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
Jakka (2026-01-10 16:40:57+00:00): hekomheining ok maar dit moet in Engels zijn
zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dfence zie ook https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier
ik laat het aan jou voor aanpassen
Thmss (2026-01-10 17:42:04+00:00): Ik heb het geprobeerd aan te passen: barrier=fence. Is dit wat je bedoelt?
Jakka (2026-01-10 17:49:21+00:00): Ja thx
NeisBot (2026-01-06 05:12:57+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/183476423 v6 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/408342434 v5

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176865192
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-06 05:41:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24645764 v6
rempshaener (2026-01-06 09:19:20+00:00): Hallo,
wie bereits in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176862755 geschrieben: Das Verbinden von Hydranten mit Straßen ist keine gute Idee.
Dadurch hast du hier einige Straßen verschoben.
Auf Grund des Durcheinanders habe ich die Änderung in diesem Changeset zurückgesetzt.
Bitte schaue, ob Hydranten jetzt fehlen.
Und bitte löse alle Hydranten von den Wegen, siehe https://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B%0Aarea%5Bname%3D%22Obernheim%22%5D%3B%0Away%5Bhighway%5D%28area%29%20-%3E%20.highways%3B%0Anode%5B%22emergency%22%3D%22fire_hydrant%22%5D%28w.highways%29%3B%0A%28._%3B%3E%3B%29%3B%0Aout%3B&C=48.162126%3B8.859697%3B15&R=
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2026-01-06 09:19:39+00:00): Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176862536
NeisRevert (2026-04-02 06:42:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/180751812
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-05 16:28:18+00:00): Could you update source:maxspeed appropriately as well?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176865497
user_5359 (2026-01-05 20:30:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. 
If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org.
OlasMapy (2026-03-02 12:32:46+00:00): Chechnya is a country
NeisBot (2026-01-06 05:16:52+00:00): 🌍 Bienvenido a OSM, Milmort.
Gracias por contribuir.

Para hacer que la colaboración sea más fácil y ayudar a los demás a entender tus ediciones, es mejor agregar una breve descripción de los cambios que hiciste. Los comentarios claros ayudan a la comunidad a seguir tu trabajo y proporcionar una retroalimentación mejor. Puedes encontrar consejos para escribir buenos comentarios aquí[1].

✅ Aquí hay un comentario de ejemplo basado en tus ediciones del mapa: "Actualicé los detalles de la superficie no pavimentada en las carreteras"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, Milmort.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Updated unpaved surface details on roads"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2026-01-05 15:21:22+00:00): Hi tepe0697, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 3 building(s)
- 61 landuse(s)
- 8 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176866567
trigpoint (2026-01-11 18:52:02+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231
trigpoint (2026-01-12 17:41:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177148430 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert Barbican Edits
trigpoint (2026-01-12 17:42:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177148461 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert Barbican Edits
trigpoint (2026-01-12 17:53:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177148865 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert Barbican Edits
Frank Peng (2026-01-21 06:06:29+00:00): I don't think there is a need to remove the oneway=no tag from East Cambridge Road. If there is no oneway=* tag on a road, then it is assumed that the road is not a one-way road, even though we can see in aerial imagery that this road is not one-way. It's a bi-directional road. I think it probably would've been better to leave the oneway=no tag on this road so it's known to anyone that this road is not one-way.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176866869
trial (2026-01-06 23:08:10+00:00): Sur la stèle, tu peux ajouter moved=yes (et supprimer l'accent qui n'a pas lieu d'être).
StreetSurveyor (2026-05-11 18:33:58+00:00): As a general practice in OSM, access restrictions like foot=no should only be added when there is clear on-the-ground signage or a verifiable legal basis. Without that, we risk incorrectly restricting routing and pedestrian access in the map data.
dpolovinkin (2026-07-20 09:05:04+00:00): did you see that you had 2 warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway here?
LittleFishes (2026-07-20 22:49:07+00:00): Yes. It was like that before and I left it as is. You are welcome to correct it
dpolovinkin (2026-07-23 05:59:34+00:00): > I left it as is
that's not a correct approach for OSM mapping - now you know it. and I see you resolved two of them, so leaving 2 in unfixed state doesn't make sense

> You are welcome to correct it
bro when you have 350 changesets you don't say stuff like that to somebody with almost 8000 tho 😭😭
NeisBot (2026-01-06 05:17:00+00:00): 🌍 Willkommen bei OSM, h0hes.
Danke für deine Beiträge!

Um die Zusammenarbeit zu erleichtern und anderen zu helfen, deine Änderungen zu verstehen, ist es am besten, wenn du eine kurze Beschreibung der von dir vorgenommenen Änderungen hinzufügst. Klar formulierte Kommentare helfen der Community, deiner Arbeit zu folgen und bessere Rückmeldungen zu geben. Du findest Tipps zum Schreiben guter Kommentare hier[1].

✅ Hier ist ein Beispielkommentar basierend auf deinen Karteneditierungen: "Gebäudeattribute aktualisiert, einschließlich Wohnungen"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, h0hes.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Updated building attributes, including apartments"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #NoComment
mueschel (2026-01-07 08:42:50+00:00): Hi,
these power poles got some uncommon tags:

BSK=	Derby 33kV
GSP=	Willington
Primary Substaion=	Mackworth 33 11kV

Please check the wiki how those reference codes are typically tagged.
NeisBot (2026-01-05 16:03:21+00:00): Hi _enestepe, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 89% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 12 building(s)
- 29 landuse(s)
- 9 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176868382
Rom1 (2026-01-05 17:45:46+00:00): Bonjour, les attributs tout en majuscules ne sont pas recommandés voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/France/Projet_d%27association_en_France#Typographie Dans le cas présent il conviendrait d'écrire "Métropole du Grand Nancy". Merci !
jbcharron (2026-01-07 12:08:25+00:00): Bonjour
Quelle est l'activité de l'entreprise, il n'y aucun tag qui décrit son activité
Merci
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-01-19 08:27:55+00:00): Bonjour, Désolé du délai de la réponse, nous avons bien pris en compte la remarque et nous sommes en cours de correction à ce sujet. Merci à vous pour la vigilance. Bonne journée.
SekeRob (2026-01-05 16:16:43+00:00): Includes rational of merging adjacent forests which were split at inner areas.
trigpoint (2026-01-11 18:50:36+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231
trigpoint (2026-01-12 17:41:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177148430 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert Barbican Edits
trigpoint (2026-01-12 17:53:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177148865 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert Barbican Edits
Jarek 🚲 (2026-01-29 19:17:36+00:00): Hello,

Roads should be set to highway=construction once construction has begun. Has construction begun? I have not seen any news about this, latest I could see is a tree clearing contract in late 2024. Can you share a link or a picture of the construction?
AV31 (2026-01-30 02:32:43+00:00): I saw it on the website of "Ontario's highways programs interactive map". It should begin in 2026.  A new viaduct is in construction on Yonge St. You can find it on Internet.
Jarek 🚲 (2026-01-30 02:37:28+00:00): "It should begin in 2026" means that it hasn't yet begun, correct?
Jarek 🚲 (2026-01-30 02:41:18+00:00): We have a government that is very pro-car.

They publicized tree-clearing and survey drilling contracts for planned highways:
https://news.ontario.ca/en/release/1005506/ontario-advancing-work-on-bradford-bypass
https://news.ontario.ca/en/release/1004508/ontario-building-highway-413

If they actually begun building the actual highway, we'd be hearing about it for days. They haven't...
felipeeugenio (2026-01-05 19:42:09+00:00): Hello. It is a water tank, ok. What is the name?
is it really an attraction?
I left it as a water tank.

regards
Vinber (2026-02-24 07:45:28+00:00): Bonjour,

Pour les commentaires, pourriez vous décrire ce que vous avez fait https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications

L'argument d'autorité (conseil municipal) n'en ait pas un pour OpenStreetMap. 'L'autorité' c'est le terrain.

Bonne carto
ticho2 (2026-02-21 13:06:46+00:00): Ahoj, tu ziadne automaty na suvenirove mince nie su, preco si ich pridal? Tri som uz zmazal, lebo som tadial siel a potvrdil si ze tam naozaj nie su, ale tri dalsie treba overit - je to zbytocna praca naviac kvoli takymto blbostiam.
eggie (2026-01-05 20:39:22+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Wanneer hier een bezoekadres kan het op de kaart. Het bedrijf 'moet' wel herkenbaar zijn aan de buitenkant.
Alleen een naam doet niet in OSM. Je zult de aard de aard van het bedrijf moeten toevoegen.
office=?????
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office

Gebruik ook de adresnode om op bij te taggen.

MVG
eggie
Leonardo Moretti (2026-01-11 20:05:38+00:00): Salve, ho notato che è stato dato il nome id3king711 a questa tratta, e altri nomi analoghi ad altre tratte nella zona Non mi risulta però che questi nomi siano dei nomi reali, mi sembrano più legati ad una classificazione terza di cui non conosco la natura. Vista anche la descrizione del changeset, forse si tratta di un refuso?
bigpaolo (2026-01-11 22:10:07+00:00): I nomi si riferiscono ai sentieri percorsi e documentati in dettaglio con allegate foto, grafici roadmap, distanze e tracce GPS, dal gruppo escursionistico Impronte Digitali Trekking (www.id3king.it) nel corso di una attività sul campo che dura dal 1999
Leonardo Moretti (2026-01-12 22:01:36+00:00): Più che un nome della tratta, è un riferimento ad una classificazione esterna. Il tag name va usato per indicare il nome reale della tratta, inteso come quello comunemente usato dalle persone (che nel caso di sentieri è spesso un nome storico): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
Il tag da utilizzare non è il name ma dovrebbe essere il ref, nella forma:
ref:<namespace>=<identificativo>
Che nel suo caso ad esempio potrebbe essere:
ref:id3king=711

È lo stesso tag, con differente namespace, che si utilizza per mettere il riferimento al codice REI del sentiero (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:ref:REI?uselang=it).
bigpaolo (2026-01-13 08:09:50+00:00): Grazie Leonardo,
io non ho conoscenze approfondite su come si devono usare i tag, ma ho imparato da solo quel po' che mi serve.
Comunque la prossima volta metterò in pratica i tuoi insegnamenti.
Un saluto e ancora grazie.
Leonardo Moretti (2026-01-13 23:37:45+00:00): In questo periodo sto lavorando su alcuni sentieri della zona del Fumaiolo (come nel caso oggetto di questo changeset), quando mi imbatto su queste situazioni se non ci sono problemi intanto posso aggiornare anche io rimuovendo il tag name e usando il tag ref, come detto in precedenza.
A disposizione comunque per ulteriori confronti o chiarimenti.
Un saluto!
bigpaolo (2026-01-14 14:13:44+00:00): Ciao Leonardo, ti ringrazio fin d'ora se cambi tu i tag name in tag ref quando li incontri.
Un saluto e ancora grazie.
Leonardo Moretti (2026-01-15 20:22:22+00:00): Ho provveduto a cambiare le tratte nell'area del Comune di Verghereto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177239077
Ad esempio: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/328015581
Un saluto!
bigpaolo (2026-01-16 07:33:00+00:00): Grazie Leonardo.

Paolo Biguzzi
NeisBot (2026-01-06 05:17:02+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, candycoltd.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Adjusted geometry of a node"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2026-01-06 05:17:05+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, lakesidekia.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Updated opening hours to Mo-Fr 08:30-17:30, Sa 08:30-17:00, Su 10:00-16:00"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2026-01-06 05:17:06+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, harrisonsuzukivic.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Adjusted ways and nodes"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
urk (2026-06-15 12:24:23+00:00): Hallo Ingo, in Hymendorf bin ich über ein paar addr:suburb=Wehden gestolpert. Ich bin zwar nur ein "Zugereister", denke aber dass das nicht passt (Wehden -> Schiffdorf ?).
IngoWo (2026-06-15 12:46:03+00:00): Hallo,
ja, du hast vollkommen recht. Das sollte zur "Stadt" Geestland gehören (also früher zu Langen). Falls ich das eingetragen haben sollte, ist das ein ärgerlicher "copy and paste"-Fehler. JOSM hat ja eine automatische Vervollständigung für Adressen und übernimmt da manchmal etwas aus einer Adresse, die man vorher editiert hat. Wenn man dann nicht ganz genau hinguckt, passiert so was schnell.
urk (2026-06-16 11:53:38+00:00): Kenn ich. Schaust du selbst drüber und korrigierst zu suburb Hymendorf?
IngoWo (2026-06-17 08:20:58+00:00): Hab die falschen suburb=Wehden entfernt. Ich denke mal, ich habe alle erwischt (habe mir eine Overpass Turbo-Abfrage erstellt). Dinge wie addr:suburb, addr:city oder addr:country trage ich sowieso meist nicht ein, weil das ja schon aus den eingetragenen administrativen Grenzen hervorgeht.
NeisBot (2026-01-06 05:14:55+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13432873957 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Agência de marketing digital"
---
Por exemplo, uma versão mais neutra e factual do seu texto poderia ser: "Agência de marketing digital"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-17 16:47:01+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/176910629
marcmarti (2026-01-05 18:16:52+00:00): Hello,
your changeset broke the subway validator, check here:
https://cdn.organicmaps.app/subway/sweden.html
Looking at your changeset, multiple stop area groups are not how you map. Please use one stop area group with a single name.
Thank you!
Brickblock1 (2026-01-05 18:36:46+00:00): The only error that is given by the validator is because I merged all of TC into one stop area. The validator should be updated to match since this reflects the on the ground reality better than the old tagging.

Regarding the stop area groups I would somewhat agree that this is a weird way of tagging them. I would however argue that it is the only practical way as the alternatives would be trying to agree on what should and shouldn't be included in one group. We avoid arguing about that by just mirroring what SL does. I also don't see an issue since the validator isn't giving an error. Warnings can be ignored if expected imo.
mga_geo (2026-01-18 06:23:36+00:00): Bonjour et bonne année,
Osmose signale cet arrêt : https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/api/0.3/issue/2eeef8f1-4337-aa02-22a3-b1d7c48062f8
Les attributs avec route_master ne devraient pas être présents.
L'article de Noémie : https://nlehuby.5apps.com/bien-cartographier-les-bus.html est une aide précieuse pour cartographier les arrêts.
Marc
trigpoint (2026-01-11 18:48:43+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231
trigpoint (2026-01-12 17:41:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177148430 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert Barbican Edits
trigpoint (2026-01-12 17:42:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177148461 where the changeset comment is: DWG Revert Barbican Edits