piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_3716049 (2025-09-01 12:18:04+00:00): Hi tux,
Quartier "Am Wasserturm", war die offizielle Bezeichnung für das Project. 

https://ris-moenchengladbach.itk-rheinland.de/sessionnetmglbi/suchen01.asp

In der Regel stammen die von mir eigetragenen Name, aus den Lokalnachrichten welche die wohl aus den Dokumenten (Amtsblatt) der Stadt übernehmen dürfte.

Wenn ich einen Änderungssatz hochlade  wo ich viele Unterschiedliche Quellen dabei habe, macht es es mehr Sinn die jeweilige Quelle am Object einzutragen, ansonsten wäre die Quelle ja nicht mehr nachvollziehbar.

Was die Lounger betrifft sind auf Satbild an der Stelle zwei zu sehen.
Seats 2 bezieht sich auf die Zahl der Sitzplätze einer Bank, capacity ist laut wiki für bench veraltet.

Gruß Kelso
tux67 (2025-09-01 12:36:52+00:00): hm - die aktuellen Luftbilder hätte ich jetzt mal als Dauerquelle bei jedem Änderungssatz vermutet (also ein Eintrag im source Feld des Changesets).
Es waren jetzt nach deinem CS insgesamt 4 Lounger eingetragen - 2 vor 2 Jahren als amenity=lounger - 2 neue als bench in deinem aktuellen Changeset. Da physisch da ja nur 2 stehen habe ich das jetzt auf 2 mit jeweils 2 Seats zusammengeführt.

Die Projektnamen der Projektentwickler haben m.E. nur was in OSM verloren, wenn sie entweder vor Ort mit diesem Namen identifizierbar sind (Schild, Tafel, etc.) oder wirklich dauerhaft in der Stadt so genutzt werden (in den Open Data Geodaten oder von den Menschen vor Ort). 
Monforts Quartier wäre so ein Fall. Viele andere verschwinden nach der Vermarktungsphase. Alles mit "Quartier" zu benamsen obwohl Gladbach nicht Paris ist, wird wohl eher dem Trend im Marketingssprech folgen. Müssen wir ja nicht für alle Fälle ohne triftigen Grund übernehmen.
user_3716049 (2025-09-01 14:26:16+00:00): Was die Quartiersnamen betrifft, legen diesen soweit ich das mit bekommen die Städteplaner mit den Bebauungsplänen fest. Dann kommt eine Ausschreibung auf die sich Architekten bewerben und wenn die Stadt sich für einen Entwurf entschieden hat, kommt erst die Auschreibung für die Investoren bzw. die Vorstellung auf der Expo-Real. Das ein Investor auf die Stadt zukommt kann aber sicher auch vorkommen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171269763
RichardB100 (2025-08-31 13:40:31+00:00): Left hand track does not exist and needs to be removed.
ika-chan! (2025-09-01 13:25:06+00:00): This changeset was reverted because the change in classification of a local road is against consensus: please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Greece/Highways
Elow TV (2025-09-01 16:54:07+00:00): sorry..
Tris_1220 (2025-08-31 14:00:29+00:00): Intersection: Langobardenstraße/Kapellenweg
swinetown (2025-08-31 14:05:28+00:00): Open to pedestrians that is, not traffic yet
eggie (2025-08-31 14:15:01+00:00): Dag sb,

Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.

MVG
eggie
aharvey (2025-09-03 11:17:14+00:00): reverting since this doesn't look right and no comment or justification was given.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9487066 is the route_master
DeFra85 (2025-09-18 16:23:23+00:00): Ahoi, wieso hast du das NSG Dörenther Klippen nochmal eingezeichnet?
Es existiert schon seit über 9 Jahren: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428069518/history/1
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428069518
surveyor54 (2025-09-18 17:23:33+00:00): Jepp, da muss ich die Recht geben.
Wenn das Tagging halt unvollständig ist,
𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒=𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒_𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒
𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑡_𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠=4 
fehlt, wird es in der Karte nicht dargestellt, auch differiert die Grenzziehung mit den Angaben vom "Geoportal NRW-Naturschutzgebiete - Naturschutzgebiete".
Deshalb ist es mir nicht aufgefallen.
Danke für die Info, werde es korrigieren.

Gruß
surveyor54
surveyor54 (2025-09-18 17:33:34+00:00): Wikidata war auch noch falsch!
Jordi MF (2025-08-31 21:00:46+00:00): Hola,

Me gustaría mostrar mi disconformidad en añadir un nombre en un punto de la carretera por el que no se tiene constancia en ningún mapa oficial ni en otros trabajos basados en entrevistas a gente local (como el mapa del Tossal Cartografies): el "Alt de Bel". Sobre el terreno, no hay ninguna señal que así lo indique. Este punto (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13110530110) simplemente es el más alto de la carretera. El término "alt" no es propio de estas comarcas. Es más habitual en las comarcas de Alicante y se usa para las cimas de las montañas.

Sospecho que el nombre se ha extraído del título de la siguiente web: https://www.1001puertos.com/2023/06/alto-de-bel-por-rossell.html

En esa web se usa frecuentemente el término "alto" a modos descriptivo para algunos de los ascensos que realiza su autor: "Alto del lago de Cap de Long" (Francia), "Alto de la estación de esquí de Pal"...

Por lo tanto, el topónimo "Alt de Bel" se trata de un nombre descriptivo del punto más alto de la carretera, que podría etiquetarse sencillamente con mountain_pass=yes + ele=* (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions).
aTarom (2025-09-01 07:54:22+00:00): En la revisión de nombres me ha saltado este que termina en "."
"Alt de Bel."
si efectivamente se trata de una descripción obvia se debería retirar, espero por si hay respuesta ...
Josepvc (2025-09-02 17:45:46+00:00): No entiendo por que hay que retirar en nombre ni en punto?.
Es un puerto de montaña, alto o collado referenciado en el ciclismo de Castellón desde hace tiempo en las principales paginas de altimetrías de ciclismo viene referenciado con ese nombre.
https://www.altimetrias.net/aspbk/verPuerto.asp?id=714
https://www.1001puertos.com/2023/06/alto-de-bel-por-rossell.html
https://www.todociclismoradio.com/es/alt-1367-puertos-en-360-grados/579-bel-rosell

Aperte de estar incluido en varias carreras de la provincia de Castellon como la Challenge de La Plana.
https://alicanteconelplatogrande.com/2023/01/19/el-alto-de-bel-decidira-el-ganador-de-la-tercera-etapa-de-la-challenge-de-la-plana/

Desearia que se me diera una explicacion razonable para no poder incluirlo dentro del mapa.

Saludos.
Josepvc (2025-09-02 17:50:03+00:00): Tambien sale refenciado en la Volta a Castello.
https://voltacastello.com/edicion-2023-2/etapas-2023/etapa-3-benicarlo-alto-de-bel-rossell/
Jordi MF (2025-09-03 17:51:27+00:00): De las páginas web indicadas, 'altimetrias' y 'todociclismoradio' no hablan en ningún momento de 'Alt o Alto de Bel'. 
Los organizadores de la Volta a Castelló suelen inventarse los nombres de puertos de montaña tal y como puedes ver aquí: https://fccv.es/index.php/va/smartweb/seccion/noticia/valenciana/carretera/52394-VOLTA-A-CASTELLo

Nunca ha existido el Alto del Marianet y, en cambio, ellos se inventan dicho nombre. Lo mismo ocurre con Bel. Entiendo que los organizadores de una prueba quieran ponerle un nombre para informar a los corredores y aficionados que allí existe el punto más elevado de una carretera y que tiene importancia.

Sin embargo, OSM debería de indicar aquello que existe sobre el terreno o aquello que siempre ha tenido un nombre.

Lo mismo ocurre con el Coll de Santa Àgueda (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2267073494). Ese es otra denominación que nunca ha existido para la gente de Vallibona ni hay ningún cartel. Cuando he preguntado a la gente de Vallibona, gente que vive allí y todos los días recorre esa carretera, nadie conoce ese punto con dicho nombre. Les extraña y desconfían de la fiabilidad de OSM.

Estos nombres son descriptivos y solamente sirven para que algunos renders muestren el collado o puerto.
Josepvc (2025-09-03 18:29:53+00:00): Pues los ciclistas que las recorremos y los subimos esos puertos, lo que nos extraña es que no estén incluidos en el mapa,.. vamos lo que nos hace dudar de la calidad del mapa de OSM, ya que en nuestra opinion faltan elementos claves en un mapa utilizado por la mayoría de gps y aplicaciones dedicadas al ciclismo.
de todas forma, solo tu eres el que te quejas o no admites cuando se añaden esos elementos fundamentales en un mapa, algo que por cierto se astado haciendo desde el comienzo de OSM sin ningun problema.
HellMap (2025-08-31 18:26:11+00:00): Hello,

Can you please check the existing tags and element history before changing them. It was previously already mentioned to be more careful with max speed tagging. All the speed restrictions are tagged here exactly. This road is in the city limit and the urban default speed is 50. The 90 is an exception for cars and motorcycles given by signs on each segment.
tomilijonas (2025-09-01 10:55:36+00:00): Hello, can you please help me understand of how is the total 'maxspeed' is set to 50km/hm but it is higher for every kind of transport? (70;90). I understand that his section is withtin the city limits, but woulnd this defy logic of the Key:maxspeed wiki article? Thank you

'The maxspeed=* tag is used on ways to define the maximum legal speed limit for general traffic on a particular road, railway, or waterway. By default, values will be interpreted as kilometers per hour. The speedlimit can be specified in different units if necessary. Those will be added behind the value, separated by a space (see Examples). The tag is also used on nodes to specify maxspeed traffic signs.'
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed
tomilijonas (2025-09-01 10:56:31+00:00): Lets say this, its not the exact case, but it is very similar

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Maxspeed_60_km_h_for_hgvs.jpg
tomilijonas (2025-09-01 11:13:40+00:00): Also, this area too. This section of the road is in the middle of the city where 70kmh is allowed, and the maxspeed is set to 70km/h. This is the way it should be right?
HellMap (2025-09-01 11:29:03+00:00): So the case we have here is this sign combination: https://imgur.com/VsiC1py . This is definitely not how it's usually (and logically) done, but that's what we have.

The relevant subsection from the article would be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed#Vehicles

In this case, there is no signed speed limit for "general traffic" for the primary `maxspeed`. The speed limit for general traffic here is 50, implied by default urban speed limit. Then the signs set the *exceptions* for specific transport modes to 90 and 70.

Now, is the sign combination here stupid and does the 70/90 limit cover 99.9% of practical cases? Yes. But technically it does not cover bicycles, quads/tricycles, mopeds, horse carriages, electric scooters, different types of psvs or any other legally-distinct transport modes that those supplementary signs don't apply to. That is the result of car-centrically signing exceptions like this - they will not apply to all cases. So we also reflect that into `maxspeed` subtags.

If the signs were instead more logically set like this similar to your example: https://imgur.com/x1kuE61 , then, yes, it would be `maxspeed=90` + `maxspeed:hgv/bus=70` because the top sign would refer to everyone, i.e. "general traffic", and the 70 is an exception.

You didn't link anything in your last message, so I'm not sure which area you are referring to. I am sure there are still many errors and mistakes with max speed tagging, but I would have to see the exact example to say more. If there is only 70 sign and nothing else, then yes, it would be just `maxspeed=70` for everyone.
tomilijonas (2025-09-01 12:08:05+00:00): General traffic on this road are: passenger cars, trucks and motorcycles. And by OSM definition "maxspeed = maximum legal speed limit for general traffic". So MAXimum legal speed limit for general traffic here is 90. Horses are forbidden to ride on high speed roads in Latvia. Also bicycles, electric scooters can not drive on these roads if there is a side walk near by and on this road - there is a side walk. Mopeds do not qualify as moped if ther max speed exceeds 45 km/h. So this sign also do not apply to them. If they exceed 45km/h they are qualified as motorcycles. The same goes to quats/tricycles - they fall under motorcycle category in this case and have to ride under 90km/h speed limit.
There are many analogical exception of this kind in all the baltics and they are marked as having 90km/h speed limit.

The problem for us is that we give car sharing passenger cars warning that they go over the OSM "maxspeed" limit and this is the only road that started to cause us problems and our clients get unnecessary warnings.

Can You please help us this this problem?

Here is the link from my previous message, but that road is not the same as here.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=18/56.936185/24.132804
tomilijonas (2025-09-02 05:57:21+00:00): Hello, thank you for the thorough answer. We will investigate and will try to implement the correct tags into our software.
As for, osm.org/way/826601696 our always detects that it's 50km/h
AndyB_66 (2025-08-31 17:22:27+00:00): Skoro już poprawiasz, to stosuj, proszę, właściwą kombinację znaczników.
Senihtu (2026-04-27 06:32:37+00:00): Hi!
Könntest Du über diese Änderung nochmal drübersehen?
In Dahmsdorf sind jetzt 2 KFZ-Werkstätten auf dem gleichen Grundstück
- aber mit unterschiedlichen addr:street Angaben.
happy mapping!
adamos (2025-09-01 11:27:25+00:00): Thaks for the edit. Please watch the public transport relations and try not to break them. I fixrd those for now.
Kinsio (2025-08-31 16:08:37+00:00): Hi dannmer, thanks for contributing to OSM in Beaumont. I can't find this address corroborated in the City of Beaumont's GIS map nor in the Jefferson Central Appraisal District's record for this property (neither list an address here). Do you have another source of information besides the NAD that makes you confident that it's correct?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171273328
todeveni (2025-09-06 07:26:19+00:00): 2023 kesällä ajettu/työnnetty läpi ja silloin oli tosi umpeenkasvanutta, mutta oli siellä vihjeitä polun olemassaolosta. Voinee varmaan poistaa, jos tilanne pahentunut.

https://www.strava.com/activities/9373101502
user_5359 (2025-09-06 06:26:32+00:00): Hello!Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/393132326. what is the mean of the tag yarn_bomb = yes?
UtterClutter (2025-09-06 10:52:55+00:00): It is a practice which is very common on post boxes inn the area
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yarn_bombing
user_5359 (2025-09-06 13:40:29+00:00): A very interesting art form. I haven't been able to find any comparable notation either. Could you imagine adding this key to the forum or wiki?
UtterClutter (2025-09-06 19:01:55+00:00): I would like like to see it formalised under a street art kind of setting.
It really is quite cute to see.
Langlaeufer (2025-09-01 08:59:20+00:00): Hallo pittrichimica,

bitte nicht die Bing-Luftbilder verwenden die sind hier total verzerrt. Es wäre schön wenn du die vorherige Geometrie mit den ESRI-Luftbildern (diese entsprechen auch den amtlichen Daten der lgln) wiederherstellst
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171275229
pittrichimica (2025-09-01 17:42:38+00:00): Einverstanden mit der Rücknahme der Mauerkonturen, die anderen Änderungen waren allerdings survey und sollten bleiben. Ich schau mir das Ganze heute abend nach der Arbeit an…
Langlaeufer (2025-09-01 17:45:09+00:00): Danke dir, und weiterhin frohes mappen.
pittrichimica (2025-09-02 15:24:33+00:00): Hab's korrigiert, ich hoffe, es passt jetzt so. Dabei fiel mir auf, dass die Heldenburg 2x drin ist, 1x als Punkttag, einmal als Flächentag, so dass sie doppelt erscheint. Sollte auch noch angepasst werden, oddr? Ich überlasse das aber mal den permanenten Mappern, war nur auf der Durchreise...
Langlaeufer (2025-09-02 16:00:33+00:00): 👍 Doppelung Kann ich beseitigen.
rempshaener (2025-08-31 20:28:04+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Nur eine Anmerkung: Das Feld „couplings“ bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten leer, da es sich um die „Angabe der vorhandenen Anzahl an Schlauchanschlüssen“ handelt, siehe osm.wiki/DE:Key:couplings?uselang=de. Unterflurhydranten haben in der Regel nur mit Standrohr eine Schlauchkupplung. 
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
ilias_ (2025-08-31 23:07:13+00:00): The buildings look great, thanks for editing in Morocco!
RIL91 (2025-09-01 06:05:53+00:00): You're welcome
AndyB_66 (2025-08-31 18:17:04+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Gregory Peony (2025-09-02 03:39:54+00:00): Why did you tag the highways in the way you did here? Particularly the Eastern and Southen one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171276697
Gregory Peony (2025-09-02 02:45:45+00:00): Hi, why did you add a layer=2 tag to this highway? This appears to me to be an invalid use of the tag, so I have removed it in changeset 171339864. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer 

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171277028
dmjab13 (2025-09-06 22:07:49+00:00): classifying lehigh st as a trunk route when it's not even a 2/3 digit state route feels wrong. i agree when it meets cedar crest and becomes PA29, but the auto mile is just a primary route IMO
Joseph R P (2025-09-11 01:29:07+00:00): Roads are classified based on their connectivity rather than their designation, especially since highway designations are often arbitrary in the scope of navigation and tend to reflect which entity maintains the road more than anything (particularly in more urbanized areas). This particular unsigned stretch completes part of the most direct route from West Chester and Pottstown towards Allentown.
englu (2025-08-31 19:03:38+00:00): Czy ta zmiana drogi jest poparta wizytą w terenie? Szlak czarny zawsze szedł drogą, która została teraz skasowana. Czy w terenie jest zmiana szlaku?
Cristoffs (2025-08-31 19:18:58+00:00): Nie. Natomiast tam na 100 nie ma drogi o kategorii track. Mogę wycofać tą zminę, natomiast musisz mi powiedzieć jak ta droga wygląda na tym odcinku
englu (2025-09-01 07:31:30+00:00): Nie pamiętam jak wygląda, byłem tam w 2017. Bezpiecznie będzie oznaczyć tę ścieżkę jako path, czarny szlak w portalu PTTK nadal tamtędy biegnie: https://malopolska.szlaki.pttk.pl/438-pttk-malopolska-siepraw-zach-las-bronaczowa-wschod. Dzięki.
w_morland (2025-08-31 16:56:16+00:00): Hi there, I’ve added a note as there are currently 3 restaurants in OSM for that unit. Please feel free to reply if you know if any of them are no longer there and let me know if you have any questions. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4939539
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171278401
Udarian (2025-08-31 17:19:18+00:00): from what I remember, in this area there are no bike lanes. you can use the sidewalk or the M-path so bicycle=use_sidepath would be the correct tag to use. Also if you look at recent aerial and street side imagery non of them show painted markings on US 1 that indicate that you can ride your bike on the main road.
Udarian (2025-10-02 17:14:57+00:00): please respond
Udarian (2025-10-02 17:17:57+00:00): as per the latest imagery there aren't any bike lanes or marking indicating for bikes to share the road with cars on this section of US 1 South Dixie Highway so bicycle=yes is incorrect from what I can tell
Udarian (2025-10-14 20:27:04+00:00): please respond
Comino (2025-08-31 20:55:25+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
IT entrepreneur and Bitcoin enthusiast
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
Comino (2025-08-31 20:55:44+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
IT entrepreneur and Bitcoin enthusiast
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
Ropino (2026-03-10 10:44:59+00:00): Hallo,
Aktuell stehen die Automaten mitten auf der Straße/Kreuzung. Bitte Position korrigieren. Danke.
𝔸𝔹_ (2025-08-31 18:03:11+00:00): From: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway

Note that highway=* distinguishes roads by function and importance rather by their physical characteristic and legal classification. Usually these things are highly correlated, but OSM is not obligated to copy official road classifications.
AndyB_66 (2025-08-31 18:19:57+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
felipeeugenio (2025-08-31 22:52:13+00:00): Idem aqui. Ese tag es para otra cosa.
felipeeugenio (2025-09-01 12:31:08+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle


ahí puedes ver todas las combinaciones posibles.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171281407
w_morland (2025-08-31 19:08:09+00:00): Hi there, this showed up because the edit uses the tag vacant=yes. This seems pretty uncommon (188 uses in the UK https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/tags/vacant=yes ) compared to the disused key https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:* which currently has 10,578 https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/disused I thought I should comment and check before potentially going in and changing to disused. Thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171281501
liscklonu19 (2025-09-01 15:39:05+00:00): Please make your changesets locally, in smaller areas, not across multiple countries at once. It just clutters the changeset history in unaffected areas.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
TranslatorPS (2025-09-01 16:37:05+00:00): Prosiłbym Cię o przeczytanie dokładnie strony → https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:OpenRailwayMap/Tagging_in_Poland#Kategoryzacja_tor%C3%B3w . Klucz usage odnosi się do linii kolejowej ogólnie i tutaj powinna wrócić wartość branch. Klucz service odnosi się do poszczególnych torów i tutaj zależnie od roli toru powinna być wartość siding (t2 i t3) lub yard (t5) :)
liscklonu19 (2025-09-01 15:39:42+00:00): Please make your changesets locally, in smaller areas, not across multiple countries at once. It just clutters the changeset history in unaffected areas.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
DodoGTA (2025-09-01 08:02:08+00:00): Čia bažnyčios vardas buvo parašytas tik rusiškai (tai bandžiau išversti į lietuvių kalbą)
Tomas Straupis (2025-09-01 08:18:15+00:00): Tai tvarka, bet name žymoje Lietuvoje lietuviškai rašome (yra net tokia automatinė tikrinimo taisyklė). name:ru ir šiaip name:xx gali būti visi krakoziabrai :-)
w_morland (2025-08-31 18:49:58+00:00): Hi there, thanks for the edit. The noexit=yes tag is used for dead ends which do not connect rather than for gates https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:noexit%3Dyes I’ve applied the correct tagging of a locked gate in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171283426
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171281898