piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nona mostafa (2025-10-30 09:13:24+00:00): Hi alain2003,
Thanks for sharing the references and for your work on the map!
According to highway=primary, the primary classification already serves well as a major road connecting cities and areas, even before the expressway is fully completed.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=primary
It’s also important to keep the road network hierarchy consistent, ensuring higher-class roads connect smoothly to lower ones.
Thanks again for your contribution!
Best regards,
nona mostafa
mirror176 (2026-01-06 02:20:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1233660278/#map=19/33.582342/-112.135138 doesn't seem to be disused but you left amenity when adding disused amenity; I reopened it but let me know if you have awareness that it is for sure closed as I haven't looked too recently. Not all Angie's locations are Angie's Lobster; this one is labeled on the building as Angie's Prime Grill as can be made out in their image https://static.wixstatic.com/media/03768c_7456eb79b52848a1b94c8bbbf292531f~mv2.png/v1/crop/x_354,y_0,w_1761,h_2048/fill/w_298,h_416,fp_0.50_0.50,q_85,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_avif,quality_auto/Peoria%20%26%2035th%20Ave.png . I haven't looked recently so not sure if they added more symbols to the building but https://www.angies.com/locations says they offer their 4 "concepts" which the logos are clickable links. I was going to set cuisine to grill;burrito;salad based on prime grill alone but changed it to include more after realizing they have more offerings for this location listed. I'll need to think harder how best to setup opening hours for drive through, dining, and maybe breakfast to have their own timeframes. Not sure if we should have each of their four "concepts" websites for website with semicolon separator but figure generic angies is best otherwise. Menu would need to be all 4 sites unless we find it acceptable to just have a page for online ordering as, or in addition to, the menu.
TheRandomGamrTRG (2025-10-29 00:38:25+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/importing-cornwall-on-open-data/136048
TheRandomGamrTRG (2025-10-29 00:38:41+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/importing-cornwall-on-open-data/136048
Frans S (2025-11-08 11:20:19+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not connect nodes of a highway to a hedge.
Try to connect paths/highways to each other to get a network.
Best regards and keep mapping
SomeoneElse (2025-11-30 19:48:54+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!,

On this changeset you've used a "source=Google Maps" tag. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source.
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK. If not, we'll have to undo this change.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
StreetSurveyor (2025-11-09 22:59:05+00:00): I believe you may have inadvertently messed up a border here.
Baloo Uriza (2025-10-29 13:19:13+00:00): Just a heads up, if there's no lane lines, then lane_markings=no should be used, not lanes=2.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173906819
nevw (2026-03-30 05:32:23+00:00): Hi Dantine, I notice that the roundabout that you removed at Foxwell Rd and Shipper Drive appears to be changed back to a roundabout using Bing imagery. Later? Esri and Mapbox imagery would suggest to me that the new mapper has mistakenly used old imagery to regress to a roundabout
nevw (2026-03-30 05:35:44+00:00): This is the relevant changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180610361#map=14/-27.86021/153.32618
I am unfamiliar with the area.
Dantine (2026-03-30 07:06:59+00:00): Thanks for the heads up, I have reverted and left a comment on the edit. The intersection and Shipper Drive was completely rebuilt for the Coomera Connector.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-31 09:11:57+00:00): This edit description is unclear. 

What you are changing and why? 

Why you think that such mass prefixing is a correct edit?
Taya_S (2025-10-31 11:00:38+00:00): Hello Tobias,

I'd like to make sure that the warning I gave you on the forum here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposal-to-convert-keys-lst-diarienr-lst-nvrid-to-refdiarienr-and-refnvrid/137365/34, is also visible on the osm.org website.

Please stop mass editing these tags you have been editing or are planning to edit until a clear community consensus has been achieved. Ignoring this warning may lead to blocks being placed on your account.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder,  
On behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-31 11:54:29+00:00): You wanted policy document: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
Tobias Conradi (2025-10-31 12:03:20+00:00): "You wanted policy document" - why do you think so?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-31 12:35:33+00:00): Because you complained on forum that "Please stop mass editing these tags" was done without being justified by policy.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-31 12:41:05+00:00): Though I guess that "requested" would be more accurate than "wanted".
Tobias Conradi (2025-10-31 13:04:33+00:00): "Because you complained on forum" - where? Any link to show as evidence?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-31 14:02:32+00:00): It is in one of multitude of spammy threads that were deleted as spam.
Tobias Conradi (2025-10-31 14:41:14+00:00): Will you provide a link as proof?
Tobias Conradi (2025-10-31 15:32:24+00:00): @Taya Snijder: Please explain the basis for your "warning". In the forum the term "mass editing" wasn't used, now it is. What is "mass editing" and where is the policy that allows you to issue that "warning" here and threating an OSM contributor with a block?
Taya_S (2025-10-31 15:42:40+00:00): Mass edits are equivalent to automated edits in this circumstance. 

And:
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Ban_Policy
Tobias Conradi (2025-10-31 15:56:17+00:00): @Mateusz 
1) "What you are changing and why?" - Keys storing "diarienr" and "nvrid" where converted from "lst:diarienr" and "lst:ref" to the discussed and approved standard keys "ref:SE:diarienr" and "ref:SE:nvrid" to have the values stored at expected places and to be able to use tag2link for the NVRID .

2) "Why you think that such mass prefixing is a correct edit?" - What is "mass prefixing" and what is "a correct edit"?
Tobias Conradi (2025-10-31 16:00:14+00:00): @Taya Snijder: Do you have any evidence that the edit (changing two tags in one relation) constitutes an "automated edit"? If so, please provide that evidence.
Taya_S (2025-10-31 16:13:46+00:00): I am telling you that you are performing an automated edit and that the Swedish community does not agree with you performing these types of edits anymore. Whether you agree with those statements or not is irrelevant, but just for fun, have a brief look at your last 2000 or so changesets.
Tobias Conradi (2025-10-31 22:51:19+00:00): @Taya Snijder: Do you think that your reply answers the question, whether you have evidence? If so, can you link to that evidence that this edit here false under "automated edit"?
Tobias Conradi (2025-10-31 22:52:55+00:00): s/false/falls
Tobias Conradi (2025-11-01 00:19:37+00:00): @Taya Snijder: What is the definition of "a clear community consensus" as used in the text of your warning?
Taya_S (2025-11-01 05:14:15+00:00): I do not believe you are engaging in good faith discussion and will therefore not be responding to these question anymore.
Tobias Conradi (2025-11-01 05:48:17+00:00): @Taya Snijder: What does "these question" refer to? Are you aware of: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Etiquette/Etiquette_Guidelines#Expected_Behavior : Expected Behavior Act in good faith. It is surprisingly easy to misunderstand each other, whether online or in person, particularly in such a culturally and linguistically diverse setting as OpenStreetMap. Misunderstandings can easily arise when we are debating topics or when we are in a rush or distracted. Please ask the other person to explain before assuming that a communication was inappropriate or not made in good faith
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-01 11:05:14+00:00): > whether you have evidence

you, and others can see edits at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Tobias%20Conradi/history
Tobias Conradi (2025-11-01 14:10:54+00:00): @Mateusz Konieczny: Why is that mentioned here, preceded by "whether you have evidence"? From which sentence was "whether you have evidence" taken from and what did that sentence refer to?
Tobias Conradi (2025-11-01 14:16:11+00:00): @Taya Snnijder: Are you aware of the damage your threat caused to OSM? http://web.archive.org/web/20251101141417/https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:ref:SE:nvrid&diff=prev&oldid=2914445
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-01 17:50:50+00:00): Note: I removed this offtopic/misleading claims from OSM wiki page.

Link above links archival version, not current.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:ref:SE:nvrid&action=history and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Wiki#Should_we_store_at_wiki_every_single_value_ref:SE:nvrid_/_lst:diarienr_/_lst:ref_appearing_at_wiki?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-01 17:53:14+00:00): > Why is that mentioned here, preceded by "whether you have evidence"?

because it answers your question

> From which sentence was "whether you have evidence" taken from and what did that sentence refer to?

from your question
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-01 17:54:25+00:00): BTW, " osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Key:ref:SE:nvrid&action=history and osm.wiki/Talk:Wiki#Should_we_store_at_wiki_every_single_value_ref:SE:nvrid_/_lst:diarienr_/_lst:ref_appearing_at_wiki? " above is autolinked badly. Suffix ? is also part of the link
Tobias Conradi (2025-11-04 01:56:56+00:00): @Mateusz Konieczny 
>because it answers your question
How would it answer that question?
sab27 (2025-11-05 18:46:38+00:00): Hi Zhou Yixin, what you mapped here does not correspond to anything in the satellite imagery. It is crucial that data is accurate and not fictional, as this map will be used in real life situations. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173907890
sab27 (2025-11-05 18:38:00+00:00): Hi Zhou Yixin, the features you mapped do not exist in the satellite imagery, it is entirely fictional. Please respect that the data you add will be used in real life situations and that it is crucial that no wrong or fictional data is added. Please check the instructions tab on the project page. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173908026
ion_chi (2025-10-29 12:33:13+00:00): Hi,
The "private residence" names look like descriptions more than names. You can use building=detached to indicate they're single family dwellings: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Ddetached
It's also usually a good idea to square the edges of buildings when tracing in the iD editor unless of course the building has irregular angles, see: https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/

Happy mapping
ion_chi (2025-10-30 21:03:02+00:00): Fixed here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173995517
sab27 (2025-11-07 11:38:29+00:00): Hi,  the data you added here does not correspond to anything in the satellite imagery. Please remember that it is crucial that no fictional data is added, as the map will be used in real life situations.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173908053
Glassman (2025-10-29 17:09:48+00:00): #TIP: Add the flock device as a separate node. I look for the pole's shaddow to place the node.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173908084
user_5359 (2025-10-30 19:30:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on  https://www.osm.org/way/1445898980. What is the mean of the tag "Plaza con sombra y juegos, pública- (CEMENTERIO VIEJO)" = "Malvinas Argentinas"? Did you overpaint a existing leisure=park? Did you see https://www.osm.org/way/108588564?

If you need help: You are welcome.
sab27 (2025-11-05 18:43:13+00:00): Hi Zhou Yixin, the barrier you added is entirely fictional - it is really important that you do not add any wrong or fictional data as this map will be used in real life situations. Thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173908113
sab27 (2025-11-07 11:37:53+00:00): Hi,  the data you added here does not correspond to anything in the satellite imagery. Please remember that it is crucial that no fictional or incorrect data is added, as the map will be used in real life situations.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173908357
Frans S (2025-11-14 11:48:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A question. Why did you add a bridge on a road crossing ? No waterway visible 
I removed the tag.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445904046/history#map=19/3.894621/44.509894
Best regards
Supaplex (2025-11-08 05:22:34+00:00): Block given: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18931

Please response to those changeset comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173908858
user_5359 (2025-10-29 06:52:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/6481173570 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-10-29 06:57:44+00:00): Hi Flap Slimy Outward, 
your claim does not stand, it is not the same situation. Please revert borders of Russia to the previous state.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-10-29 14:35:06+00:00): What do you mean it is not the same situation? Russia annexed Crimea in 2014 (which isn't internationally recognized) and the other four in 2022 (which also aren't internationally recognized). What's the difference here? I don't see any.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-10-29 15:18:25+00:00): The difference is that Crimea had some voting about annexation in 2014, there are some legal documents in which Russia recognizes Crimea as its part, and Russia has full control of it, while for the rest of Ukraine territories, they are under occupation, not recognized by Russia also, it is ongoing war.

Crimea and Kosovo are the similar things. Legally, Kosovo is part of Serbia, it is not recognized as separate country by UN and majority of the countries, however, it is mapped as separate country. Why? On the ground situation is that this part of Serbia has its own self claimed separatist administration. That is why Crimea can be mapped as part of Russia, while other territories of Ukraine cant. It is who controls them administratively. Claiming and disputing are present all arround the world.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-10-29 15:54:46+00:00): Well, Russia also held a "referendum" in those four oblasts (I put it in quotes because the international community views them as illegitimate). Also, just to clarify, Russia actually 𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘹𝘦𝘥 them, not just occupied them because they're at war. In the case of the latter, I couldn't find any `military=danger_area` polygon or something similar covering those four oblasts (or Kursk or Crimea) like there is in Gaza. I read that Ukraine did manage to recapture one of the four oblast's capital cities, though.
"[The four oblasts] are under occupation, not recognized by Russia. Also, it is an ongoing war." What do you mean Russia wouldn't recognize its own illegitimate annexation of four Ukrainian oblasts?
user_5359 (2025-10-29 06:19:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. 
If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org.
user_5359 (2025-10-29 06:35:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please refrain from adding private information to OSM and thereby engaging in vandalism. If you want to make meaningful additions, please read the wiki article on addresses  https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Addresses and enter them in your area.
QuiLe (2025-10-29 04:12:51+00:00): Hi, why did you delete the buildings rather than updating the geometry of the building?
*Martin* (2025-11-02 19:18:26+00:00): I agree that the edit is valid, just unfortunately some renderrers depend on boundary=administrative on border ways. For example https://www.freemap.sk/#map=9/48.764322/22.604240&layers=X
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-11-02 22:32:25+00:00): It's not just me. Many other people have been doing that over the past few years. In fact, I think that adding boundary=administrative on ways because it appears on a particular renderer (Freemap Slovakia, in this case) is "tagging for the renderer" and should be avoided. Instead, the OSM Wiki suggests opening a bug report on the renderer to fix that instead.
sab27 (2025-11-07 12:44:36+00:00): Hi, please do not add fictional data - remember that this data will be used in real life situations. Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173909574
user_5359 (2025-11-05 08:33:37+00:00): I know you just copied the tags, but do you have any idea what the tags 
Floor_Coun = 0
Room_Count = 0
mean (especially with the typo in the first tag)?
Jacksonville (2025-11-10 18:52:40+00:00): It has been explained to you know several occasions that the visa policies between two nations has no relation to the classification of highways. 

Please stop changing highways which connect borders to service roads. They are not service roads. Service roads are something comepletely different. This has been the norm across OpenStreetMap.
Frans S (2026-02-02 15:41:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
PLease check this footage how to map high buildings.

https://youtu.be/u31wPYWkm3E?si=lDbvDutpUyZWQXXL

Best regards
Raven Scales (2025-10-29 06:52:24+00:00): #tt_event
Raven Scales (2025-10-29 06:52:08+00:00): #tt_event
Raven Scales (2025-10-29 06:51:53+00:00): #tt_event
Raven Scales (2025-10-29 06:51:39+00:00): #tt_event
Raven Scales (2025-10-29 06:51:10+00:00): #tt_event
Raven Scales (2025-10-29 06:50:42+00:00): #tt_event
pwbriggs (2026-03-14 07:08:31+00:00): Hey https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Sebasawk!

We're discussing this change at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5197150, maybe you can help explain your rationale. Also, I notice the #maproulette tag—which maproulette challenge is this?

Thanks for the contributions!
Sebasawk (2026-03-17 03:56:03+00:00): Hi pwbriggs, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
Sebasawk (2026-03-22 04:00:19+00:00): Hi  pwbriggs, 
Thank you for reaching out. These edits were made as part of the United States – HOV Lanes to be Digitized Separately project (new geometry creation). I created separate HOV lane geometry in locations where there are double solid lane markings, as well as in sections with double solid lines used as separation. These edits were carried out with reference to the OSM guidelines for HOV lane mapping.

That said, I see that some of my edits are in conflict with the ground truth, where there is only a single solid line visible separating the HOV lane. I will proceed with the necessary corrections where necessary. Please let me know if these actions would address your concerns.
pwbriggs (2026-03-24 05:31:52+00:00): I don't think this should be split with double solid lines, either, as there's no buffer space indicating separate roadways. There is at least one sign on Mercer Island indicating that it is illegal to cross the double solid white line, but there are no barriers.
pepsi_max2k (2025-11-13 14:06:26+00:00): As with Shoal Bay area, where's the source for this change? Official DoD maps (produced by Tera Tech Coffey, Feb 2025, https://www.defence.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-05/Robertson-Barracks-2025-Ongoing-Monitoring-Plan.pdf ) show area matching local knowledge (roads and various amenities are not DoD land, since covered by this changeset). Will change to match DoD but please comment with source if later change is incorrect.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-14 23:04:44+00:00): Started from a DWG issue concerning land use in Holtze area that mentioned Defence land immediately to their north, together with https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4210847 & aerial imagery showing firing ranges etc
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-14 23:08:07+00:00): & sorry to be a pain, but AFAIK we don't have approval to copy Defence maps as they are all copyright.
pepsi_max2k (2025-11-15 04:50:23+00:00): Thanks. Re. Robertson, the area I’ve put in is the correct area afaik, i last jogged around the area a year ago. Area matches the fenced and signposted area on the ground, and current osm sat images of fencing / boundry roads. Theyve always owned land to right so nothing new if there’s construction there. Only queries i’d have is a) is the transmitter to left of base thier land? It’s fenced off as if it is, but pretty sure it’s not. B) is the kinked road bottom edge of close training area on dod land? I’ve jogged down it and believe the border is/was to the north of that but can check again next year. C) is the firing range north of the marksmanship area part of robbertson or shoal bay land (probably irrelevant but theres no fence dividing it).
silversurfer83 (2025-10-29 20:50:13+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

Du hast bei deiner ersten Änderung darum gebeten, dass sich jemand ansieht, was du getan hast. Das machen, wir fast alles hier, Freiwillige.

Bevor ich abschließend etwas dazu sagen kann müsstest du noch Fragen beantworten:

- Der Waldweg, der hier gelöscht wurde: Warum?

- Bei dem Parkplatz hast du die Anzahl der Stellplätze entfernt. Warum?

Grundsätzlich ist es gut, wenn du im Kommentar besser erklärst, warum du etwas tust und wenn du sagst, woher du weißt, dass das korrekt ist, was du machst

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

freue mich auf deine Rückmeldung

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173913278
JöWe (2025-10-30 05:13:20+00:00): - der "Waldweg" ist eine forstwirtschaftliche Holzrückegasse, die inzwischen wieder Besuchs aufweist
- der "Parkplatz" ist eine asphaltierte Privatfläche
aTarom (2025-10-29 14:40:37+00:00): Hola, no te ha saltado un aviso en el editor? Si una via le pones nombre y tiene el tag noname=yes, debes retirarlo, tienes más info aquí:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:noname%3Dyes
PRIMAstmp25 (2025-10-30 06:26:13+00:00): Vale, voy a fijarme a partir de ahora en las etiquetas. Gracias por tus comentarios
eggie (2025-10-29 08:22:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback 
bicycle		yes
foot		yes
horse		yes
locked		yes
motor_vehicle		yes

Lijkt me allemaal niet correct.

Waarschijnlijk is access=private de juiste tagging.
Dit is toch geen openbare weg?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
PWestenberg (2025-10-29 08:27:15+00:00): Beste Eggie
acces is inderdaad private
deze gate wordt gebruikt voor een EP NL Parkeer terrein buiten onze afgesloten plant area
PWestenberg (2025-10-29 08:31:15+00:00): Node 6548238820 is een geblokkeerd hek welke permanent gesloten is
eggie (2025-10-29 08:31:37+00:00): Ok... Dan alleen access=private toekennen en geen andere tags behalve evt emergency=yes als hulpdienste de mogelijkheid hebben tot toegang.
Je edits   https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=173914915

Pas je het zelf aan naar access=private?

MVG
eggie

MVG
eggie
PWestenberg (2025-10-29 08:34:51+00:00): ja ga ik proberen te doen :)
eggie (2025-10-29 08:35:53+00:00): Top.. Alle begin is moeilijk.