piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Anas masuris (2026-06-26 20:07:13+00:00): Alright, I'd suggest editing the existing hotel https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28252464 and removing unnecessary node in that case (given that the hotel way has more information (tags/keys) and keeps the history of an object)
gsoosg (2026-06-26 20:19:39+00:00): Removed now. Now that I'm using ID's editor, I see that the Name is locked through a Wiki tag. Also, there is an Official Name Tag with the correct name. The location of the node shows correctly in ID, but not so in the Organic Maps app (it shows in the buiding below there).
eggie (2026-06-26 22:05:37+00:00): Dag Ruben.. Een naam alleen doet niets in OSM. Voeg ook de aard van het bedrijf toe.
MVG
eggie
Ruben Mepschen (2026-06-27 05:54:47+00:00): Dank je wel!
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-27 10:31:56+00:00): Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5363570 ?

If river flows underground then maybe it should be tagged accordingly?
marczoutendijk (2026-06-26 14:24:31+00:00): Alonso (not Aloso)
eggie (2026-06-26 22:08:38+00:00): Alle valus zijn UK English.. Dus kijk even in de wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service_times

MVG
eggie
Thosewhoknow (2026-07-14 15:54:05+00:00): Be more careful with the roads
3Loader3 (2026-07-14 19:36:11+00:00): Well that's weird. No idea how that happened. It only appears at a certain zoom level.. zoom out it's fine, zoom in it's fine.
I can't find any way to fix it either. If I go to edit, it's looks perfect. 

Hmm.
Thosewhoknow (2026-07-15 11:26:31+00:00): Oops, sorry. I should have mentioned that I fixed it after I made that comment.
eggie (2026-06-26 15:32:33+00:00): Bste,

Zou je svp concreet willen aangeven waar je kleine aanpassingen uit bestaan.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-06-26 15:08:41+00:00): Dsg Ruben
..maar er is toch maar één kerk?

Mvg
eggie
eggie (2026-06-26 21:41:54+00:00): De kerk stond er nu 3x op. Aangepast naar 1x.

MVG
eggie
kingkingHK (2026-06-27 04:06:31+00:00): Descriptive name?
vectorial8192 (2026-06-28 17:10:38+00:00): Chiming in.

We may tentatively follow KCR East Rail and make name hold "Northern Link" and then alt-name hold "Spur".

If no updates then make note at Kwu Tung for tracking. Low priority because not done until some years later.
Kovoschiz (2026-06-29 07:07:46+00:00): Then it should be Northern Link only, as it will be treated as the same line, also similar to TKO Line. `usage=` can be used, and `section:name=`
bxl-forever (2026-06-26 17:35:31+00:00): Hello, emena,

This is another friendly attempt to reach you, in addition to previous messages and notes.  I came across some of your changes of the past days, which I patiently repaired one by one.

This is the 6th time in 9 days that you change the tags of this plant nursery.  It looks like you are still "testing" how to use OSM.  While that wouldn’t be a problem in a sandboxed environment, you are actually editing… the production database. Live OSM data is not a suitable place to test things.

More precisely, I don’t understand how this "Essayer de supprimer le formatage" title reflects on what you changed.

In this edit, you added an alt_name=* tag with an identical value as short_name=*.

We feel this is incorrect. There is no need to write the same information to multiple tags for the same object.  It sounds to me that short_name=* is semantically correct.  If you have a real reason to want to use alt_name=*, fine, but in this case we should remove the other tags, and not keep both.

Whereas adding those small zones on the map is a good idea, those constant back-and-forth edits do not help building confidence in your contributions.  Can you please explain what you are trying to achieve, and why do you *need* alt_name?

Thanks in advance.
Buraddo (2026-07-09 15:30:25+00:00): Changeset reverted in #185415913.
Please add real data on the map.
Buraddo (2026-07-09 15:51:10+00:00): #185417204
Syl (2026-06-28 10:14:17+00:00): Bonjour, les deux notes dans cette zone ont l'air de fournir des captures d'écran de Google Streetview comme sources. Vous avez trouvé d'autres sources pour confirmer ?
samuel_geovelo (2026-06-29 06:49:17+00:00): Bonjour @syl, oui j'ai cartographié en me basant sur l'ortho Express IGN 2025
Syl (2026-06-29 09:15:40+00:00): Ok, merci pour la précision et merci d'avoir modifié. Comme ce n'était pas marqué dans les commentaires du changeset j'avais un doute.
eggie (2026-06-26 15:49:49+00:00): Dag Stef.. 20a is niet hier.
Probeer als het kan op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen.
Mvg
eggir
eggie (2026-06-26 21:30:14+00:00): Merged info with addressnode
EneaSuper (2026-06-27 07:45:31+00:00): Ciao, grazie delle modifiche, la viabilità da quelle parti è spesso complessa.

Comunque, mi sono permesso di ripristinare questo nodo, dato che devi averlo spostato sicuramente per errore:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184683785
camminatoreseriale (2026-06-27 13:29:16+00:00): E hai fatto benissimo, maledizione… Ogni tanto i point si attaccano al cursore, belin.. comunque sì, in effetti in quelle aree saranno 15 anni che le strade cambiano ogni due mesi (ci passo spesso e sono certo che anche tu le conosci benissimo, visto la precisione con cui hai sistemato molte cose nell’area) grazie a te! 😊
EneaSuper (2026-06-27 15:05:52+00:00): Grazie, comunque sì guarda, ogni tot tempo la viabilità viene modificata, ma è da molto che ho deciso di non metterci più mano proprio perché non ci si capisce un acca sinceramente 😅😂
kartler175 (2026-06-30 11:12:39+00:00): Da besteht noch weiter Reparaturbedarf:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=6.79642&lat=50.31899&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=ring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Robert Skiba (2026-06-30 13:08:41+00:00): Danke dir für die Info. Ich schau da später mal. Falls du Zeit hast, reparier es gerne. Da ist wohl schon länger was im Argen
AlexRiabtsev (2026-07-06 18:02:09+00:00): Шановний, а звідки у вас інфо про секрети прикордонників і навіщо ви їх нанесли на карту?
Djack-OSM (2026-07-06 18:33:52+00:00): Вітаю. Я додаю детальні об’єкти, бо хочу покращити якість і деталізацію мапи в цій місцевості.
Benoît C MdP (2026-06-29 08:43:39+00:00): Bonjour Baptiste

Le couloir bus de ce tronçon de la rue Vergniaud est bien ouvert aux cyclistes. Je corrige.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11288473 
Bonne continuation

Benoît
Kovoschiz (2026-06-26 17:23:17+00:00): 0. Please use descriptive upload comment, and split your uploads 
1. Please don't add brackets to `name=` , which is proper names only. `ele=49` has already added.
mueschel (2026-06-27 09:53:22+00:00): Hi,
the coordinates of this POI seem wrong - this is a parking lot.

Please also check your wheelchair tags - "has_wheelchair_accessible_entrance" and similar don't exist.  Please check the wiki for common tags, e.g. "parking:disabled" and "wheelchair" on the node of the entrance.
GarliccBread1 (2026-06-27 05:19:24+00:00): I changed E County Line Rd within the Erie town limits to just "E County Line Rd", with "County Road 1" in the alt_name, since all of the street signs within Erie only use that name, so County road 1 should be in the alt name. Erie maintains the roadway here rather than Weld/Boulder County, so County road 1 isnt the roadway's name within Erie. Erie is incorporated.

For CO 7, I changed the name to "State Highway 7" because that's what is consistently/actually shown on the roadway signage. Weld County's GIS uses **Highway 7**, but that name doesn't appear on any signs in the field. Using both would also be redundant, since a navigation app could end up reading the road name three times, which no driver wants to hear haha. (for example: "Turn right onto CO 7 / State Highway 7 / Highway 7").

That said, either county does not actually assign an official street name to this roadway. Many Colorado county GIS departments simply populate state and U.S. highways with generic names like "Highway XX" for database purposes rather than as official street names. Because of that, I think the cleanest solution may actually be to tag it as noname=yes` with ref=CO 7, (or ref=CO 7, name= State Highway 7) since the route designation is the road's primary identifier rather than a true street name.
SD Mapman (2026-06-28 01:05:49+00:00): So I based a lot of this on addresses and county info. When I verified anything south of CO 52, either "E County Line Rd" (it would spit out NE County Line Rd, not sure where the N came from it doesn't make sense), so as a compromise I would be open to moving "County Road 1" to alt_name=, alt_name:right=, and alt_name:forward=, and deleting name:left= and name:backward=. 

For CO 7, I am opposed to the noname=yes approach in general. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=40.000370817447276&lng=-105.02656564900894&z=17.95496583045889&pKey=1692051697672071&focus=photo and https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=40.000614301762965&lng=-105.02659055197&z=17.95496583045889&pKey=454349028994039&focus=photo&x=0.49367637054800373&y=0.5068654705238257&zoom=0 look exactly the same, so both should be in the name= field. Given that there could be different constructions of number-based names depending on the jurisdiction (e.g. some counties just use "Highway" some use "State Highway", etc.), it's just easier to put the whole thing in name=. Looking at that stretch of 7 again, I don't think there's actually any of it in rural Weld County, so the "Highway 7" and the left, right, forward, backward name tags can probably be removed without loss of data.
SD Mapman (2026-06-28 01:07:09+00:00): I realized I never finished my second sentence. See below for what it should read since you can't edit changeset comments.

"When I verified anything south of CO 52, either "E County Line Rd" (it would spit out NE County Line Rd, not sure where the N came from it doesn't make sense) or "County Road 1" would work for the street name"
SD Mapman (2026-06-28 01:16:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184721045
GarliccBread1 (2026-06-29 23:50:13+00:00): Sounds good! I agree with this approach within the town limits! I’m also not too sure where NE County Line Rd would come from. Erie picked up the name East County Line Rd from Boulder county’s name for the road, Boulder names it E County Line Rd (CR-901).
pooh79 (2026-07-07 14:54:05+00:00): привет!
использование такого namе нежелательно:
landuse=farmland
name=участки личных подсобных хозяйств

"Если местность постоянно используется под огороды, то landuse=allotments.
Есть вариант, когда колхозное поле в определённые годы используется под посадку картошки, например, но эти посадки используются для частных лиц (на каждое хозяйство по несколько борозд). В этом случае уместнее тег landuse=farmland.
Тег name в любом случае надо убрать. Или вовсе убрать, или перенести в description."
Любые вопросы можно обсуждать в телеграм-чате t.me/byosm.

А вообще спасибо за активную отрисовку!
PaulYukhniuk (2026-07-07 15:41:06+00:00): Приветствую! Благодарю за ценные советы. Уже начал откат неуместных тегов и названий.
Nakaner-repair (2026-07-02 08:15:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184960823 where the changeset comment is: Revert all recent changesets (last 7 days) by ticki_52 due to vandalism. Revert 184929333, 184929605, 184929885 due to conflicts/double mapping.
ftrebien (2026-06-26 18:05:44+00:00): Isso está totalmente fora das regras de classificação.
danieldegroot2 (2026-06-26 17:28:54+00:00): Hey Anne,

This outdoor seating location does not look accurate. Could you take a look, please?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5362770

Regards,

Daniel
mueschel (2026-06-27 12:05:00+00:00): Hi,
could you check your sockets?  You use "socket:type2_combo:current" for the voltage - this should be "socket:type2_combo:voltage".

"socket:type2_combo:output_400V" is not yet used in other places - usually we only tag the highest possible output.  If we need such details, maybe a 'conditional' tag would be more versatile?
socket:type2_combo:output:conditional = 300 kW @ voltage=800; 150 kW @ voltage=400
jeka p (2026-06-29 19:28:22+00:00): Hi!,
danke. Werde in den nächsten Tagen "socket:type2_combo:current" auf "socket:type2_combo:voltage" abändern. Habe irgendwie die Tags verwechselt.

400V und 800V:
- es gibt wirklich kein richtiges Tag dazu.
Die Leistung in kW muss auf jedem Fall mit Spannung verknüpft werden: die meisten E-Autos unterstützen das 800V-System nicht,.. Darum hat auch die Angabe von (teoretisch) höchstmöglicher Leistung kein Mehrwert... Habe selber ein 400V E-Auto und solche Angaben sind leider nur verwirrend.

Welches Tagging-System richtig ist, kann ich nicht sagen.
Das "*:conditional"-Muster klingt sehr vernünftig, da es natürlich auch bei anderen Angaben genutzt wird.
Ein Thema für Wiki-Forum?
SG
mueschel (2026-07-10 09:41:12+00:00): Eigentlich sind die verschiedenen Output-Angaben gar nicht notwendig. Der limitierende Faktor bei all diesen Stationen ist der Strom. Wir können also einfach zusätzlich *:current angeben, dann ergibt sich der Rest von alleine. 

current = 187.5 
output = 150 kW
voltage = 800

Wenn bekannt ist, dass ein Auto nur 400V verträgt, dann kann sofort berechnet werden, dass beim maximalen Strom nur 75kW zur Verfügung stehen.
jeka p (2026-07-22 19:19:39+00:00): Das habe ich mir auch am Anfang gedacht. Ist in der Praxis auch nicht 1 zu 1.
Hier ein realer Beispiel:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12407851195
150 kW bei 800V
und
80 kW bei 400V
Es ist eine echte Angabe am Display vor Ort
mueschel (2026-07-22 19:45:20+00:00): Das passt hier aber auch:

:output=150 kW
:current=200 A

Hintergrund ist wahrscheinlich, dass das Kabel für 200A ausgelegt ist, die Anschlussleitung der Station aber nur 150kW hergibt.

Wir bräuchten nur spezielle Tags für den Fall, dass man bei 400V weniger als die Hälfte bekommt im Vergleich zu 800V - aber da dürfte es schwierig werden ein Beispiel zu finden.

Was wesentlich wichtiger ist, ist die Gesamtleistung der Station - sehr oft müssen sich die 2 Plätze ja die Leistung teilen. Ich vermute, dass das bei deinem letzten Beispiel auch so ist - 150kW nur wenn ein Platz leer bleibt.
eggie (2026-06-26 17:35:55+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.
De hoofdtag is amenity=drinking_water. Dat geeft een pictogram.
Mvg,
eggie
Frans S (2026-06-29 11:59:29+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not cluster buildings but map each building as an individual building.
Best regards
Samuel Niman (2026-07-01 01:50:09+00:00): Okey, i will take the advice for next buildings, thanks
sq7obj (2026-06-26 17:54:04+00:00): Według PRNG i MPHP ten poprawiony ciek to Kwaczałka, ALE patrząc na satelitę i hillshade główny nurt w Rozkochowie biegnie dalej na północ/północny-zachód, a według PRNG/MPHP przy ul. Sikorskiego w Rozkochowie odbija na wschód i biegnie przez pola. Obstawiam nieaktualne/błędne dane w MPHP. Do weryfikacji w terenie.
sq7obj (2026-07-05 19:19:43+00:00): Po weryfikacji: Kwaczałka (nazwa z PRNG/MPHP, w OSM Żabieniec; 1019718209) biegnie zgodnie z przebiegiem na OSM. Ciek przechodzący w Rozkochowie przy Podgórnej jest faktycznie wyschnięty i nie ma połączenia z korytem Kwaczałki. Dane w PRNG/MPHP są nieaktualne.
Thiago AG (2026-06-26 20:57:31+00:00): Hi, can you share the rational behind this change? I've been using service or driveway classification for segments that are the entrance of gated communities. They usually pass inside a gateway or building. The only reason do drive there is to enter/exit the gated community. Do you think this is wrong? Thanks!
LakePoopó (2026-06-30 09:51:14+00:00): Hello Thiago AG. I reclassified https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964225574 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964225575 to living street for consistency (I saw that a majority of the ways that you reclassified to living street, were once residential). Also, the service=driveway classification seems to fit this definition ”Primarily provides direct access to a house, garage, or carport; a small number of parking spots may be available for occupants.” more than a gated neighbourhood as seen in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway. Thank you and happy mapping!
felipeeugenio (2026-06-26 22:35:03+00:00): Hola. Gracias por las ediciones y bienvenido.

Cuando un local deja de existir, no hay problemas con borrar los datos del local, pero la dirección sigue existiendo. 
Ya recuperé la del pub borrado.
Por otro lado, por favor no realinear calles. La foto que usted ve (bing) es una de varias y todas con alineaciones distintas. Hay otros métodos para saber si están bien o mal, pero por ahora no moverlas.


gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184659701
JJIglesias (2026-06-26 23:47:49+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
Caden K08 (2026-07-10 19:08:50+00:00): Lo siento, Lo haré mejor.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-15 05:13:25+00:00): DWG revert - unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185760941
eggie (2026-06-26 19:28:42+00:00): 👍
Frans S (2026-06-27 08:01:14+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on ths project.
A few remarks.
Please square  each rectangular building.
Don't cluster buildings that are close to each other. 
Don't get  roads crossing buildings .
Best regards and keep mapping
JJIglesias (2026-06-26 23:46:28+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
ScrawnyMeowth1 (2026-06-27 20:14:27+00:00): Please avoid making large changesets that span multiple continents. This clutters up the History tab on the OSM website. This could easily have been two separate changesets.

In addition, the roads you added are located in a parking lot, rather than a residential area, so highway=service would be more appropriate than highway=residential.
Gangadi Anusha (2026-06-29 11:19:14+00:00): "Thank you for the valuable feedback and for bringing this to my attention. Your feedback is very helpful in improving the accuracy and quality of the map. I look forward to your continued suggestions and feedback in the future
Thanks and Regards,
Anusha.G
DressyPear4 (2026-07-01 14:39:13+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/184918363
JJIglesias (2026-06-26 23:45:56+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
Frans S (2026-06-27 08:05:37+00:00): Hello 
When you see a white scattered area , it is mostly a building with a tin roof where the sun reflects. Map those objects as a rectangular building please.
link:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1532815115/history#map=19/1.582965/30.275530

Best regards
Frans S (2026-06-27 08:16:16+00:00): Please check this link to see the adjustments I had to made to get the correct mappings that reflect the reality.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=184684429

Please take your time and map more accurately, 
Quality prevails above quantity,
Best regards
JJIglesias (2026-06-26 23:44:59+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
JJIglesias (2026-06-26 23:44:07+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
JJIglesias (2026-06-26 23:43:56+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
JJIglesias (2026-06-26 23:43:46+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
Gsgeorge (2026-06-26 20:11:01+00:00): Please leave a changeset comment for your changes. You are making a lot of changes with no explanation.
JJIglesias (2026-06-26 23:43:31+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
JJIglesias (2026-06-26 23:41:52+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
JJIglesias (2026-06-26 23:41:35+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
JJIglesias (2026-06-26 23:39:24+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
JJIglesias (2026-06-26 23:39:08+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias