piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
h551w (2023-04-06 20:02:52+00:00): Love to see OSM being on top of construction! I will say though that it generally isn't worth tagging shorter-term construction that'll take less than a few months to finish. Not that it's incorrect, but just since a lot of apps using OSM data can take a month or more to update and shorter closures will (hopefully) be well out of date by then. There's no hard lines on what should or shouldn't be tagged, but the wiki has a few best practices in the opening section of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction#. This definitely doesn't apply for *new* construction though, so absolutely keep tagging new things going up with construction=* as soon as they start!
Hakuho (2023-04-04 17:44:51+00:00): Hello FvGordon,
Can you explain to me my mistake in this zone?
Thank you.
FvGordon (2023-04-05 16:30:53+00:00): On the western side of the path "Chemin des Ruelles" there were laying two nodes on top of each other, which I have merged. I don't know, how this happened with the standard editor iD when moving a node to the position of an other node.
Filip009 (2023-06-13 19:06:31+00:00): Dobrý deň, prosím o vysvetlenie vašich zmien.
Prečo ste na niektorých úsekoch zmenili proposed na abandoned?
Prečo ste z niektorých dlhých úsekov spravili mosty?
Michal Polášek (2023-06-13 19:33:05+00:00): Hezký den, ten most je chyba, opravím, omlouvám se. Co se týče změny proposed na abandoned, jde o to, že jsem chtěl odlišit situaci, kdy některé úseky železničního spodku už byly postaveny.  Ty jsem označil za "abandoned". Ostatní, kde se nezačalo stavět, jsem ponechal jako "proposed". Samozřejmě opravím, pokud si myslíte, že to je špatná úvaha.
Filip009 (2023-06-13 19:50:20+00:00): *Sú tam minimálne dva mosty :)
Pozerám, že táto bola hneď na to zmenená aj naspäť https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/790742354/history.
Tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/984725857 sa jedná o most, ktorý nikdy na mieste nebol.
Taktiež tento most nikdy neexistoval https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/984725870
Podobne ako tento https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/984723005
Michal Polášek (2023-06-13 20:11:34+00:00): Ano, ty mosty tam nejsou. Už si nepamatuju, proč jsem to tehdy tak chybně označil. Všechno jsem opravil na "proposed".
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-03 20:20:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4320327637
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10782523079

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_20113811 (2023-08-25 04:01:49+00:00): you cocksucker
user_20113811 (2023-08-25 04:01:54+00:00): you cocksucker
user_20113811 (2023-08-25 04:01:59+00:00): Do you like that Russians rape women?!
user_20113811 (2023-08-25 04:02:09+00:00): Fuck all you!
user_20113811 (2023-08-25 04:02:11+00:00): Fuck all you!
user_20113811 (2023-08-25 04:01:53+00:00): dickhead
user_20113811 (2023-08-25 04:02:02+00:00): shitface
user_20113811 (2023-08-25 04:01:51+00:00): you fuckhead
user_20113811 (2023-08-25 04:01:57+00:00): you faggot!
user_20113811 (2023-08-25 04:01:58+00:00): You fucking little asshole
user_20113811 (2023-08-25 04:02:06+00:00): you faggot!
user_20113811 (2023-08-25 04:01:46+00:00): shitface
user_20113811 (2023-08-25 04:01:55+00:00): you faggot!
user_20113811 (2023-08-25 04:02:05+00:00): You are raper too!
user_20113811 (2023-08-25 04:02:07+00:00): are you defending Russian? bitch, they will find you and punish you, you fagot
user_20113811 (2023-08-25 04:01:55+00:00): you support russian? you support raping women?
user_20113811 (2023-08-25 04:01:57+00:00): you little ass
user_20113811 (2023-08-25 04:02:03+00:00): you faggot!
andrewsuzuki (2023-08-23 19:51:51+00:00): For the tunnel under CT 2, is "The Tubes" the official name? Or would it be better to put that under loc_name
a_runner (2023-08-27 21:16:42+00:00): The Tubes is the most common name for this trail, but there is technically not a "signed name" or official trail name. It is blazed green (which I think is already included in the relation). The official Shenipsit trail takes a road detour around Rt2, but the Tubes trail is the most commonly used cut through to avoid the long road detour by going under Rt2 instead of around it. I would be of the opinion of keeping it in the name, but since its not technically an official name, feel free to change the name if you think its better for another field. I think the naming convention for trails on OSM is a bit inconsistent anyways, and I previously had another user become upset when I added the official names to trails already mapped as relations. Even though there are some very popular major trail systems in NE where I have seen the trail names included under both the individual path name field and relation name, so not sure why its ok for some areas but not others. Maybe smaller CT trails arent popular enough to be named in both places?
andrewsuzuki (2023-08-28 04:53:12+00:00): Gotcha, I didn't realize it was blazed. I went there last year and it kinda just looked like a water tunnel that people snuck through. Seems fine in the name tag I guess.
As for trail names, generally I prefer the CT way of doing it. Of course, many segments of larger trails have their own names, and segments may be part of multiple trails, so having it in the relation only is often the least messy/d.r.y. solution. Of course, the downside is that the default OSM layer doesn't render trail relation names, which is probably why it can be seen as acceptable to do it in other places. Though to me that's kinda borderline "Tagging for the renderer" (see wiki page).
Filip009 (2023-06-13 19:56:16+00:00): Taktiež neviem o tom, že by boli zvyšky trate viditeľné až na takom úseku, ako ste oddelil https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159489940
Michal Polášek (2023-06-13 20:12:46+00:00): Opravil jsem tento úsek podle digitálního modelu reliéfu zde: https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/teren/toc?pos=48.718933,20.015345,16
Je tam vidět, že práce probíhaly v izolovaných úsecích.
Filip009 (2023-06-13 20:16:30+00:00): Okej, vďaka za opravy.
eggie (2023-04-04 07:30:53+00:00): Bedrijfsinfo verwijderd... shop=vacant toegevoegd.
Anders blijft daar een opticien op de kaart staan. 
groet
eggie
user_5359 (2023-04-04 05:40:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please describe a object (a name isn‘t a description) Did you mean highway=crossing?
pantufla (2023-04-22 12:43:44+00:00): Hola Guaiquerí, te escribo por las ediciones en que le pones de nombre a un plaza: "Plaza" y a una cancha "cancha". Esto es muy común cuando uno está empezando pero sigue las directrices de mapeo de la comunidad. Te paso el artículo de wikipedia donde explica cuándo no usarlo. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:name

Cito: No uses name=* en los siguientes casos:

Si la característica no tiene nombre en la realidad
____

Ahora bien, para describir que es una cancha o plaza utilizamos todas las etiquetas descriptivas que pertenezcan al caso. Ya con esos valores quedará representado como tal.
guaiquerí (2023-04-24 21:26:39+00:00): Hola, entendido
silversurfer83 (2023-04-05 09:18:05+00:00): Gude und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

ich bin selbst nur einfacher Beitragender und beobachte die Gegend um mich herum und freue mich immer, wenn neue Mitstreiter auf der Karte auftauchen. Willkommen.

Diese Art der Kommentare an einer Änderung ist der übliche Kommunikationsweg um mit anderen Mappern über die Änderung (changeset) zu sprechen. 

Diese Änderung sieht übrigens ziemlich gut aus :)
Ich habe nur einen kleinen Hinweis für deine Arbeit mit dem Editor, den du nutzt (der heißt iD und ist der Standardeditor, wenn man im Browser auf "Bearbeiten" klickt): iD versucht immer nahe Objekte miteinander zu verbinden. Wenn also zum Beispiel ein Weg kurz vor einer anderen Linie (zum Beispiel einer Wiese) endet, lässt iD den letzten Punkt (node) des Weges auf die Linie (way) der Wiese schnappen und verbindet diese. Wege und Wiesen sollten aber eigentlich nicht unbedingt verbunden sein, daher bitte ich dich, da ein wenig aufzupassen.

Ansonsten weiter viel Spaß in Feld und Wald und happy mapping 
silversurfer83

P.S. bei Fragen: immer raus damit. Entweder direkt oder im Chat:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers

Gute Informationen für Anfänger findest du hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide
RR76 (2023-04-05 09:50:18+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ich habe den Pfad von den Wiesen getrennt.
danieldegroot2 (2023-04-30 20:55:02+00:00): See also
https://www.geograph.ie/photo/5926855
Gonéo (2023-11-08 09:11:33+00:00): Bonjour, 

Le terme «voie réservée navette…» n'est pas un nom mais une description. Il faudrait déplacer ces termes dans le champ description. La voie bus pour le stade s'appelle «Promenade du Biezin» selon la BD-Topo. 

D'autre-part d'après les panneaux C115 présents sur place c'est une voie-verte et non une route `unclassified`.

Il y a une discussion ouverte sur le forum à propos de ces changements https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/nom-descriptif-ne-pas-confondre-nom-et-description/18780

Cordialement
ovruni (2023-04-04 00:09:11+00:00): Hola ciber-boy-kev, gracias por contribuir a OSM. En este conjunto de cambios se han agregado nombres como "TENIS", "CANCHA CENTRAL TECHADA", "BASQUET TECHADO", etc. Sin embargo el uso de nombres esta destinado solamente para aquellos objetos que tengan un nombre particular y no para agregar descripciones de los objetos. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
Saludos
ovruni (2023-04-04 00:11:58+00:00): Hola ciber-boy-kev, en este conjunto de cambios al igual que en el anterior conjunto de cambios se han agregado nombres descriptivos en algunos objetos, por otra parte en varios de sus conjuntos de cambios se han agregado comentarios en conjuntos de cambios como "xd", "XD", "xd}", lo cual no brinda suficiente información sobre los cambios realizados. Por favor revise la documentación sobre los buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
Saludos
andi9876 (2023-04-05 15:16:28+00:00): Hi.
There is no sign about u-turn restriction. Better not add. Most crossings in Phnom Penh are not u-turns allowed. So don't need add. Some navigation systems cannot read correctly.
Greetings,
Andi.
andi9876 (2023-04-05 15:16:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159457838#map=19/11.58305/104.90024
Pegasus21 (2023-04-10 13:30:14+00:00): Here is a link to the ground footage where the no_u_turn restriction is visible. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=11.58336&lng=104.900178&z=17&focus=photo&dateFrom=2017-01-01&pKey=656602739802377

Even if no u turns are implied, it helps to add the restrictions in order to prevent the u turn. If some navigation software doesn’t process that information then it shouldn’t disrupt their routing. Other softwares do process no u turns restrictions, so it would be important to add them for those types of routing software.
andi9876 (2023-04-10 14:20:44+00:00): Ok.
But it's really necessary and helpfully to add hundreds (or thousands) of restrictions?!
Pegasus21 (2023-04-10 15:55:23+00:00): We map according to ground imagery to ensure safety and accuracy of what the municipality has determined.       
As for adding restrictions, we add what we see in the ground imagery because we can confirm it. The reason we add those is because it's determined by the local municipality. 
We don't add them to clutter the map, we add them to improve the routing and to ensure the safety of users. 
Regards, Pegasus21
eggie (2023-04-04 07:05:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2023-04-06 19:38:34+00:00): hello can you explain these edits? the one in Praia Formosa doesn't make any sense. 

Please reply before reverting
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2023-04-06 19:42:06+00:00): reverted
seichter (2023-04-06 21:17:37+00:00): Nice to meet you again with your inspiring comments :(.
The Passeio Maritimo in the eastern part of Praia Formaosa leading to the tunnel simply did not exist last week. The tunnel may have been open for some time, but the Passeio has vanished at least the last 4 years.
I left the western part from Camara de Lobos and the eastern part to Doca do Cavacas untouched, but there existed a third route connecting the both via the tunnel.
I just removed there the part through the tunnel and inserted instead the deviation per Estrada Monumental because many people are unsure how to get around the closed tunnel.
If that route is disturbing you, you may delete it, I have no ambitions on that.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2023-04-06 21:21:17+00:00): that is not true. heres pictures https://www.dnoticias.pt/2023/3/11/351661-reabilitacao-da-proteccao-maritima-existente-na-praia-formosa-quase-concluida/

also the tunnel is open
seichter (2023-04-06 21:38:52+00:00): I have been there on 2023-03-22 and at least at that day all people had to use the deviation like the years before.
If  you have more recent information, feel free to correct.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2023-04-06 23:15:49+00:00): impossible, since the 11th of march the constructionm of the retaining wll is build and opened
eggie (2023-04-04 07:08:07+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. Hier heb je het fietspad verbonden met de landuse=residential
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=134471295

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-04-04 07:13:35+00:00): landuse losgemaakt van fietspad
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-03 21:30:22+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/928542083

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-06-24 18:06:14+00:00): Hi, there is an error present in your edits around here, highway intersections and highway intersections with waterways don't have a common node.

It's easy to see here
https://keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=14&lat=48.20808&lon=16.37221

When highways intersect they should always have a node at intersection and for waterways you have to see if the water you should check if you should add a tunnel for a waterway.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-06-24 18:07:07+00:00): better link
https://keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=15&lat=59.52178&lon=24.88647&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C70%2C90%2C100%2C110%2C120%2C130%2C150%2C160%2C170%2C180%2C191%2C192%2C193%2C194%2C195%2C196%2C197%2C198%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C281%2C282%2C283%2C284%2C285%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C295%2C296%2C297%2C298%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C320%2C350%2C370%2C380%2C401%2C402&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-06-24 18:09:27+00:00): another kind of connectivity error, this should connect with the road.
https://keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=146&error=141753669
user_12500175 (2023-04-05 20:08:27+00:00): Hallo,
bist du dir mit "Haus Lebensart" in Mering sicher dass es da ist? Ich kenne das nämlich nur in Kissing.

Gruß
Danfost
ThetaDev (2023-04-05 23:24:05+00:00): Ja, ich bin an dem Haus vorbeigelaufen.

Hier ist eine Website, wo auch die Telefonnummer zu finden ist.

https://lra-aic-fdb.de/landratsamt/fachbereiche/abteilung-1-zentrale-angelegenheiten-kreisentwicklung-oepnv-beteiligungen/altenhilfe-senioren-behindertenberatung-heimrecht-pflege/betreutes-wohnen/uebersicht-betreutes-wohnen/
user_12500175 (2023-04-06 08:03:22+00:00): Ah, ok, dann passt das ja.
Die Namensgleichheit war mir bis jetzt so nicht bekannt.

Gruß
Danfost
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-03 21:50:24+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10782768399

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
jaap de vries (2023-04-06 10:10:11+00:00): Je geeft aan dat het huis wordt gesloopt, de BAG geeft aan dat het huis een winkelfunctie heeft maar niet gesloopt wordt / is. https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?objectId=0268010000029690&theme=BRT%20Achtergrond&geometry.x=183569.79700000002&geometry.y=426959.546&zoomlevel=15  Maar een verbouwing heeft dus iets anders dan slopen. Kijk je dit nog even na, ik kom hier morgen 7-4 ook weer dus ik e.e.a. ook controleren.
jxpsert (2023-04-06 10:16:44+00:00): Ja, alleen de voorgevel staat nog. Verder is het helemaal plat.
jaap de vries (2023-04-07 06:48:49+00:00): Er is geen sloop vergunning bekend bij de gemeente , via https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/ . Zal straks even kijken als ik hier toch in de buurt moet zijn.
jaap de vries (2023-04-07 08:35:59+00:00): Zojuist even langs geweest. Het pand uit 1924 wordt verbouwd naar de huidige maatstaven, het bouwoppervlak blijft hetzelfde, dus het pand mocht niet zomaar van de kaart worden verwijderd. Een revert van je bewerking zal nu worden toegepast.
gscscnd (2023-04-04 06:07:09+00:00): Tu była kombinacja traffic_sign=maxspeed + maxspeed=50 + traffic_sign:direction=*. Bez pierwszego tagu pozostałe mają bardzo ograniczony sens.
Interswd (2023-04-04 12:15:45+00:00): poprawiłem, zobacz czy dobrze
gscscnd (2023-04-04 13:52:06+00:00): Wygląda lepiej.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-31 16:06:49+00:00): Hello!

You used
waste=trash;1
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10782756063/history

Have you maybe meant
waste=trash
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
vnourdin (2024-01-31 17:26:41+00:00): Hello,
That's clearly a typo, thanks for your message !
Yonseca (2023-04-03 22:13:42+00:00): Incluye también un pequeño cambio en la carretera y la calle Dinamarca
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-01 17:05:03+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10782804009/history has shop = photographer that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=photographer ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=photo or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft%3Dphotographer would be better tag?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-01 17:05:35+00:00): Also, what is the source of this import?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-09 10:36:34+00:00): Note: if source and license of imported data will not be clear it may be necessary to remove imported data.
user_5359 (2023-04-04 05:38:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move the node to the right building.
5m4u9 (2023-04-04 21:21:59+00:00): En los nombres no debería haber abreviaturas, a menos que así sea su nombre. Pocos locales podrán entender que es UE, pero otras personas no familiarizadas pensaran que es un error.
WC392309 (2023-04-05 23:46:01+00:00): I'd like to point out that these edits are inconsistent and don't reflect traffic patterns
DiogoBaptista98 (2024-11-28 04:58:56+00:00): Nomeadamente na AML, vi que apagaste todas as tags das estações que estavam em areas e as transformaste num único ponto piorando assim a qualidade dos dados e a precisão do mapeamento dessas estações, ora essas areas estavam ligadas a projetos wiki associados, alteraste trabalho feito por todos nós, Peço que não voltes a reverter trabalho pela comunidade feito sem qualquer discussão previa. Para melhor discussão convido a que participes no grupo de discord da comunidade em https://discord.com/invite/zy5wuBK6EM
emersonveenstra (2023-04-04 10:22:04+00:00): Thanks for doing that! One more quick note on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296965100, the drink tagging is a different type of tagging called a key prefix, so instead of drink=wine;coffee you do drink:wine=yes, drink:coffee=yes (you'd probably use a more specific value than yes). This page has all the information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:drink:*
Mecheye (2023-04-04 19:52:49+00:00): Got it!
user_5359 (2023-04-04 05:32:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys)!
felipeeugenio (2023-04-04 20:22:21+00:00): Hola. por favor no usar contracciones en las palabras. Escribir los nombres completos.
saludos
Johnny Mapperseed (2023-04-04 02:12:51+00:00): Accidentally brought up wrong changeset history option for comment - meant OSIP, not Bing
felipeeugenio (2023-04-04 13:28:43+00:00): lo mismo para los semáforos.
Apenas pueda me voy a meter a ayudarte. Pero hay que fijarse en la dirección.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134476162
felipeeugenio (2023-04-04 20:26:24+00:00): Estimado. Es primordial que se una al chat en Telegram.
Por favor hacerlo en el link: https://t.me/OSMcl

Saludos
felipeeugenio (2023-04-04 13:27:58+00:00): Hola.
perfecto con agregar el signo pare. Pero por como lo agregaste, el signo pare vale para los vehículos que vienen en ambas direcciones.
Para hacer la distinción tienes que agregar direction=forward o backward.

para saber cual de los dos es, tienes que fijarte en la dirección de la vía. La línea está dibujada en una dirección y se nota con pequeñas flechitas en la línea.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134476194
user_8466505 (2023-04-04 02:49:36+00:00): Congrats on 1000 changesets! 🎉
kr4z33 (2023-04-04 07:06:27+00:00): woohoo! thanks.
mego_map (2023-04-04 08:10:24+00:00): Hello K1u9r8d9;
 Please be aware when you changed the classification from "highway=primary" to "highway=tertiary" you didn't change the classification in the links associated with it.
Examples of links that need to be changed in classifications:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/617717954
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/775177162
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/617717955
Could you check it and fix it, please?
Regards
mego_map
Emilius123 (2023-07-08 13:47:06+00:00): NO
michiganguy123 (2023-04-04 04:35:08+00:00): trunk to primary***
Msiipola (2023-04-28 16:58:10+00:00): Hi! Building created on top of a track
Jan_Kola (2023-05-04 06:32:18+00:00): Hi Msiipola,

Thank you for the feedback. I fixed the data.
Yunan973 (2023-08-09 23:32:49+00:00): Hi,

why did you keep the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14647500 with no member : do you need it for later ?

Best regards
Yunan973 (2023-08-10 22:16:16+00:00): Hi,

why did you keep the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14647500 with no member : do you need it for later ?

Best regards
tyfi (2023-04-04 05:32:05+00:00): I quadruple checked this one. I know that the statistics metadata should probably be updated, I just wanted to get the geometry in place for now.

Please let me know if there is any problem, and I will be happy to help. Also reactivate #3625698 note if it's relevant to the problem/concern.
tyfi (2023-04-04 05:35:39+00:00): I mentioned this in the note, but to get ahead of any confusion: the City of Arnold is coterminous with the civil township of Arnold. Both share the same land area which is an enclave of the unincorporated Windsor Township.

This means Arnold (both city and township) does not border Saint Louis County. Unfortunately, this was the case on OSM for a long time which was a major factor in my edit.
tyfi (2023-04-04 05:37:50+00:00): Also, Imperial the CDP to the south does not reside within Imperial Township (to its west). Ugh... Neither is incorporated