piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-01-19 07:14:55+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1245027423 v2 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1245027422 v2 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/10695302281 v2
https://osm.org/node/10695302275 v2
https://osm.org/node/10695302274 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177380875
bhietsch (2026-01-20 21:33:14+00:00): Hi - is there a more appropriate name for this relation besides "Hike"? If not, I would suggest leaving the name blank or removing the relation.
matthewfecica (2026-01-20 21:53:41+00:00): This is for internal purposes. I needed the route for something.
bhietsch (2026-01-20 22:32:50+00:00): Might I suggest Komoot or a similar routing app instead? OpenStreetMap is a data source for all users, and others might find the data with vague naming a bit confusing. Hiking routes in OSM are reserved for documented, official routes that hikers can easily follow through signage, or in this case perhaps NY State resources.
matthewfecica (2026-01-20 22:39:24+00:00): Hi I know what OSM is used for, this was only temporary. I looked at Komoot and it only allows you to set start and end destination, there is no way to select the individual segments. I am planning on deleting this "temporary" route soon.
bhietsch (2026-01-20 23:20:43+00:00):  Thanks for understanding. While I may not know your exact use case, I can share that Komoot does have the capability to plan a round trip with waypoints, and it’ll tell you the distance between each of the waypoints. I would recommend sticking to their desktop app sincs it’s a little more intuitive for adding waypoints and ordering them correctly. Best of luck!
matthewfecica (2026-01-20 23:40:58+00:00): Okay, I'll play around with Komoot some more. Maybe you know an easier way. A local author has written several hundred hike descriptions, I'm trying to help him get a gps file for each hike. So what I'm doing is following the hike on a map, and creating a temporary route, then going to Waymarked Trails and downloading the gps file of the hike, before deleting the temporary route.
bhietsch (2026-01-21 20:09:27+00:00): Sounds like a cool project! Creating the route manually in Komoot using a round trip with waypoints is probably the best free method. Strava used to be a great option as well before they pay-walled it. There should be plenty of tutorials online for how to do this (here's one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Kw-HcIOYQc), but long story short you not need to create the temporary relations as long as the trail ways exist in OSM.
matthewfecica (2026-01-22 00:13:55+00:00): Thanks! Komoot seems to be doing the trick. One question, is there any limit to the number of routes that I can have saved (there are close to 400 that I need to get a gps file for). How often does Komoot update their base map? There were some OSM changes that I made, and and it still shows the old tracks, so I'm guessing probably a few days?

This is helpful since should there be any reroutes or anything it will be easy to revise the tracks and download an updated file. 

With Kamoot I noticed that it does limit me to one region (I chose Westchester County), but $9 for the Hudson Valley and $9 for Skylands, and $9 for Gateway aren't bad

And for the tracks, is there a way to adjust level of detail? When I zoom in I noticed that it does points at lets say 100 foot increments. Is there a way to get it to follow the OSM track exactly? This is just something minor.
ALu68 (2026-01-18 18:40:35+00:00): Hallo FroschForscher,
piste:type=downhill hat was mit Wintersport zu tun - nicht mit einer 
sport=skateboard Halfpipe
FroschForscher (2026-01-18 19:25:26+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich hab die Tags wieder zurück geändert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177388324

man_made=piste:halfpipe + piste:type=downhill werden gesetzt wenn man in iD nach "halfpipe" sucht.
infeeeee (2026-02-04 17:41:31+00:00): Szia!

crossing_ref=* helyett manapság a crossing:markings=* címkét használjuk, sokkal részletesebben le lehet írni felfestéseket.

A crossing_ref marad azokban az országokban ahol ezek az állatnevek használatban vannak, nálunk ilyenek nincsenek.

További jó térképezést!
bordaben (2026-02-06 14:07:54+00:00): Szia!

Igazad van, kicsit figyelmetlen voltam. Javítottam az eseteket.
kingkingHK (2026-01-19 02:15:30+00:00): Tbh feels like a descriptive name; are you sure?
vectorial8192 (2026-01-19 03:28:47+00:00): Your concern is valid, but what name can you possibly suggest other than this kind of descriptive name? Re other notes, the real name is currently unknown.
kingkingHK (2026-01-19 04:51:07+00:00): Would no name be fine? This can be moved to `description`, only adding name after it's finalised (although by then the constrution will probably be finished).
Kovoschiz (2026-01-19 17:32:02+00:00): "Tung Chung East" is a planning name. That's still a name.
DmitriyOrange (2026-01-18 18:44:00+00:00): Добрый день. Подскажите причину закрытия?
dypa (2026-01-19 07:09:02+00:00): Причина закрытия указана в комментарии к заметке. Вы можете самостоятельно посмотреть на историю изменений точки по такой ссылке https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13279620544/history
NeisBot (2026-01-19 07:15:00+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 21 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/439002527 v18 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/161744492 v9 | 8 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1737065741 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177382397
NeisReview (2026-01-27 06:39:30+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177687284
dmjab13 (2026-01-20 18:49:39+00:00): please submit this on a country/region basis, not in a changeset like this
Langlaeufer (2026-01-19 13:22:16+00:00): hi, es braucht kein access=no für Fußwege - die ausschließlich für Fußgänger. Mit access=no verwirrst du nur Auswerter und Renderer.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177382595
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-18 18:02:51+00:00): 

jak podajesz plany (co jest mocno wątpliwym użyciem OSM) to zawsze, zawsze podawaj źródło i potwierdzenie że to realne plany a nie fikcja

plus nazwa na https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9468950874/history jest mocno wątpliwa
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-18 18:06:06+00:00): skąd ta nazwa "Gorzów Zieleniec"?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-19 08:56:02+00:00): wysłałem też PW - https://www.openstreetmap.org/messages/1322023
jarzyna ze szczuczyna (2026-02-04 18:22:24+00:00): studium. um wrzuca dużo różnych pomysłów, tu proszę jeden https://geoportal.um.gorzow.pl/gorzow_wielkopolski/miejski-system-informacji-przestrzennych?baseMap=140&checkedLayers=31661%2C34923%2C31662%2C31663%2C31664%2C31665%2C37826%2C31669%2C31670%2C38408%2C37828%2C31668%2C33990%2C33991%2C34017%2C33993%2C34014%2C33992%2C33994&composition=409&lat=52.764280458793614&lng=15.260530947530013&zoom=11
eggie (2026-01-18 17:59:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback: Wanneer het pad niet meer als pad herkenbaar is dan kun je het beste taggen disused:highway=path
Dat voorkomt ook opnieuw intekenen. 

Wanneer het is afgesloten, maar nog wel een pad dan zou access=no correct zijn.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Bolbuyk (2026-01-21 21:51:17+00:00): Dit pad bestaat in feite niet meer. Aan de westzijde is er een ononderbroken hek en bovendien dicht gegroeid, aan de oostzijde liggen er bomen op de weg en ziet het er ook dichtgegroeid uit. Naar mijn overtuiging is dit pad opgeheven. Met disused:highway=path, betekent dat hetzelfde als de tag 'highway=path' verwijderen met het 'prullenbakje'?
eggie (2026-01-21 22:05:29+00:00): Yep.. highway=path verwijderen en de regel
disused:highway=path toevoegen
Dan zie je straks geen pad meer op de kaart.
Het voorkomt opnieuw intekenen.
eggie (2026-01-18 18:13:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-01-18 18:02:47+00:00): Tip Een trap tag je met highway=steps

horse en bicycle= no hoef je niet te taggen op footway. Dat is default.

MVG
eggie
justynabu (2026-06-10 18:37:50+00:00): Czy na drodze 1343030439 nie ma dostępu?
pebepebe (2026-06-15 08:07:29+00:00): Jak ostatnio tam byłem czyli 5 miesięcy temu to był zakaz przejścia (teren budowy). Teraz to nie wiem, sytuacja może być dynamiczna.
justynabu (2026-06-15 08:40:54+00:00): Dzięki za info.
monohedron (2026-01-25 03:17:58+00:00): Dupe of 13167430091?
NeisBot (2026-01-19 07:26:36+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13464481868 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Math tutoring center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-27 06:39:26+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/177418972
eggie (2026-01-18 18:05:57+00:00): Dag Bolbuyk  Zou niet te snel access=no taggen.

Het is een ruiterpad. 
Wanneer het pad opgegaan is in de natuur en dichtgegroeid gebruik dan disused:highway=....  

Dan rendert het niet meer.
Gebruikl alleen access=no als dat aangegeven staat. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-18 18:07:55+00:00): Zelfde verhaal. Waarom access=no   Staat dat aangegeven?
Wanneer een pad onbegaanbaar is dan kun je dat aangeven met smoothness=impassable
Een ruiterpad routeert alleen voor ruiters.
Geheel dichtgegrooid gebruil disused:highway=bridleway
MVG
eggie
mohamedd_ahmed (2026-01-19 14:11:12+00:00): Hello MarvelousExterminator,
I hope you're doing well! Thank you for your continued contributions to OpenStreetMap.
I was curious about the addition of the "M15" value to the ref tag for certain streets (way 220440681, way 292575616, way 372368202, way 496991171)
in the changesets (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177384505)(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177385124)
Where the same value represents "int_ref" for these streets, and the int_ref value is true according to (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Mashreq_International_Road_Network)
But I was wondering if ref and  int_ref  tags have the same value
If you have a source that confirms this action, can you share it with us?
Best regards,
Mohamedd Ahmed
David Kříž (2026-03-13 13:14:02+00:00): how did you find it is ready? It leads to nowhere... and will be opened as a compact road with the bridge, which will be ready in may 2026!
Eino81 (2026-03-13 13:18:04+00:00): Hi David, actually someone else put that road "active" on OSM, and that affected our Wandrer map. So I went there by bike and I was able to get until that point, where the bridge almost started. If you think, you can put this whole section as "under construction"... Which is, in some sence...
Eino81 (2026-03-13 13:19:36+00:00): I checked, he was the one, who "activated" that:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/VSA_
I just corrected a bit...
David Kříž (2026-03-13 13:26:41+00:00): sorry, it looked like you did it. Othervise, I dont think riding a bicycle somewhere means "it is open" :-) I think, when you were there, you should fix it as a witness :-) Beause only you can write "local knowledge and survey".
Eino81 (2026-03-13 13:35:26+00:00): True, and I agree with that. It was not so closed, actually, there was only a concrete "barrier"... So it is not open for the public yet, but it was easily "accessible"...
David Kříž (2026-03-13 14:26:25+00:00): all the road should have status "in built" so white/orange! I dont understand, why it is yellow. Barriers? This is simply in built with no access, what other should barriers mean? :-D
eggie (2026-01-18 18:09:22+00:00): Wanneer het een officieel ruiterpad is dan is foot=no de juiste tag.
Dus unknown geeft verwarring.
Je mag als wandelaar niet op oficiele ruiterpaarden komen.

MVG
eggie
Bolbuyk (2026-01-21 21:33:44+00:00): Dit stuk pad was onderdeel van een langer pad. Dat heb ik toen gesplitst. Dit deel van de splitsing heb ik niet bezocht. Maar vanwege de splitsing was ik gedwongen het op de één of andere manier achter te laten. Ik weet even niet hoe ik dit nu af moet ronden.
eggie (2026-01-21 21:40:48+00:00): Het is zoals het is. Je kunt niet alles.
Evt kun je een fixme= op het traject zetten en/of een opmerking op de kaart zetten. Dan pakt een andere mapper het evt op.
Zou er niet mee zitten 😀
Mapse..
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-21 11:14:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13464573800
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/707241234

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-21 13:24:47+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13464573800
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/707241234

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
felipeeugenio (2026-01-19 12:05:30+00:00): Hola. Cambiaste el camino de path a track y luego a service. Son tres cosas muy distintas.
Pueden pasar vehículos por el camino? esa vendría siendo la primera pregunta.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177385666
J_Fortuna (2026-01-19 13:46:34+00:00): Hola Filipe, gracias por el comentario.

El camino en cuestión no es un path (sendero), ya que es transitable por vehículos motorizados. Se trata de un camino de ripio/grava que da acceso a un estacionamiento, y puede ser utilizado por cualquier tipo de automóvil.

El acceso es privado y está controlado por un portón en la intersección con la calle Hermanos Philippi; el ingreso está permitido únicamente durante el horario de apertura del estacionamiento (aprox. 10:00–18:00).

Por ese motivo consideré más correcto clasificarlo como highway=service, con función de acceso a estacionamiento, en lugar de path o track.

Saludos y quedo atento a comentarios.
felipeeugenio (2026-01-19 17:06:11+00:00): Ok, gracias por su tiempo en responder. Se veía raro tanto cambio, pero está ok.
saludos
SekeRob (2026-01-27 11:43:28+00:00): Hi,

An observation made last week when something needed fixing here. If seeing it right when you have multiple 'inner' areas sharing sides in e.g. a wood you draw a new outline around those inner areas and make that the inner as kind of an envelope, This is not needed since years as learned from a French mapper and later confirmed by Minh Nguyen, the preeminent OSM guru. Try it, just make all of them directly inner and the software will compute an outline around them in the render process. 1 exception. The 'inner' object must have at least 2 nodes directly facing the 'outer' area. It works but the analysis tools go on tilt for that inner-inner area so I'm still mapping ring around those make that inner but it's needed rarely. Here's a link to an example just done today with 4 sidesharing inner areas inside a larger scrub zone https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20142671#map=17/41.583563/14.634116
No scrub symbols on the individual areas inside.
Happy mapping.
DabMK (2026-01-27 11:50:05+00:00): Hi,
What u're saying is correct, but only for the OSM official website renderer. I have tried/coded more renderers and it's a pretty hard thing to implement and I've also never seen another OSM renderer doing that. I used to map like you suggested me, but some programmers suggested me to start doing it like I do it now because like you do only works with OSM website renderer.
Thank you!
eggie (2026-01-18 18:20:47+00:00): Dag FJ  De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
dknelson9876 (2026-01-20 03:02:55+00:00): Hi exboyscout, thank you for this edit. A fence sounds much more appropriate based on your reply on your previous changeset.

Since you indicated in your changeset comment here that this is a construction barrier, is there any signage on site, or any online materials, to indicate the length of time this barrier will be present?

Because of the slow cycle that some data consumers use, we generally don't map things that will be there for less than 6 months. This is to reduce the chances that some data consumers show a temporary barrier for a year (or more).
msevilla00 (2026-01-19 14:41:00+00:00): Hola Arturo,
¿Estás seguro que no es `landuse=meadow` en vez de grassland? Uno es herbazal y el otro pastizal... aunque no sabría que poner en este caso.
Ese polígono es mejor que nada pero habrá que afinarlo un poco porque hay diversas zonas sin vegetación y áreas de roquedo que sobresalen en el lugar.
Saludos
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2026-01-20 01:59:57+00:00): Hola,
Estoy afinando toda la zona sierra-Segovia capital, espero poco a poco que vaya quedando más preciso.

Sobre cuál etiqueta es mejor, no estoy seguro. Puse pastizal porque no es inhabitual ver ganado pastando pero herbazal también se podría ajustar.

Saludos
msevilla00 (2026-01-20 21:01:27+00:00): Por eso mismo que dices, que esuna zona donde están pastando las vacas sería pastizal (meadow) y no herbazal (grassland).
De todos modos, es que el etiquetado de coberturas y usos del suelo en áreas no urbanas es algo lioso si no complejo, sobre todo en áreas mediterráneas puesto que se pensó originalmente para áreas al norte de los Pirineos.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-26 13:05:14+00:00): Hello!

You used
place=islet;
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24937024/history

Have you maybe meant
place=islet
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-04 06:21:56+00:00): As you can clearly see from the existing `contact:phone` tag you modified, your phone number is in an invalid format for OSM. *Especially* as you are paid to map to promote your client's business, it is _imperative_ that you ensure you do not introduce invalid tags or values (especially very basic ones like `phone`) and degrade the quality of the data on the map.
MxxCon (2026-01-21 00:31:58+00:00): If you are sure that this feature doesn't have a name at all, you could add tag noname=yes as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:noname%3Dyes. That makes it more explicit rather than a name might be missing.👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177387467
Rainero (2026-03-19 20:33:46+00:00): Revert mit changeset/180128666
(unzulässige Quelle)
MxxCon (2026-01-21 00:33:08+00:00): Hello.
Please note that "personal" is not a valid tag value for the "swimming_pool=" tag. You can read more about this tag at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:swimming_pool
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177387744
NeisBot (2026-01-19 07:35:05+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 33 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1468060200 v1 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1468060201 v1 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1468060202 v1 | 7 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1520018764 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177387801
LordGarySugar (2026-05-20 16:38:24+00:00): Hi, please make sure to add in crossings at intersections, otherwise routing will not work properly. Also, sidewalks within gated estates should be tagged access=private, in the same way that the roads are.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-18 19:21:25+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 160618524, 160618634, 160618996, 160730427.
MxxCon (2026-01-21 01:13:46+00:00): When working with multi-polygon relations, please make sure that you add tags to the relation itself, rather than its polygon members.
Additionally, please do not glue features to each other unless they are actually connected. In this edit you attached a footway to a baseball field. That is incorrect.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177388395
eggie (2026-01-18 19:43:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Tip.. Gebruik PDOK actueel als achtergrond. Bing is vaak verouderd.
De witruimte heb ik verwijderd. 

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
MxxCon (2026-01-21 01:16:37+00:00): Hello.
Please note that it is incorrect to tag these features as "addr:city=New York". This tag value is intended for features that are on the island of Manhattan. This is Queens, a totally different borough.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177388789
rhhs (2026-02-16 18:09:59+00:00): You added a lot of individual trees around the new CSKA stadium. To me it looks like a small forest that I would have mapped with as an area with landuse=forest (a managed forest, so not natural=wood). Why didn't you?
Luke_Vader (2026-01-18 21:21:52+00:00): Great thank you. But In this case I would remove the address from the building and have the *entire* address to the entrances.
Also, watch out, you tagged the wrong entrance kind on the 10b entrance as entrance=staircase
I updated everything in changeset/177392238
Thank you and happy mapping!
kerbless (2026-01-24 17:12:53+00:00): Thank you for the guidance!
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 05:25:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177389053
MapSpot (2026-03-03 16:54:09+00:00): Hi LordOfThe Sheps

Welcome to OSM! Glad to see your StreetComplete contributions to Orange Tree, and wanted to give a heads up I'll be adding a lot of new sidewalks, footpaths, and crossing in the coming days, so stay tuned for new local review items. :)
Supaplex (2026-01-19 04:11:44+00:00): 軍事營區內的道路通常都設為access=no
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177389313