piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Odra_99 (2024-07-29 12:17:44+00:00): @Map47 ho ricontrollato, ovviamente posso che ringraziare se un utente mi corregge anche perché penso che si veda che non sono utente da moltissimo tempo.  Ho visto che come linea hai usato "marciapiede" ma lì non esiste alcun marciapiede circolare come lo hai disegnato. Io abito il quartiere accanto ma lo frequento quasi tutti i giorni, sostanzialmente ho cercato di rappresentare il più possibile la realtà con le informazioni più giuste possibili. In pratica c'è un marciapiede tra la strada "Lungomare Cristoforo colombo" e questa piccola strada, serve a dare lo spazio all'autobus per fermarsi alla fermata "Cristoforo Colombo" per poi fare inversione. Quindi non capisco il perché usare una linea marciapiede circolare. Capisco che il tutto deve essere collegato e se ho sbagliato questo mi sta più che bene la correzione, ma secondo me non rispecchia la realtà. Se hai bisogno di più informazioni posso fornirti immagini/video privatamente. Sono anche nel gruppo telegram di OSM Italia
Odra_99 (2024-07-29 12:22:13+00:00): @ivanbranco grazie mille dei consigli e scusate se in questo modo ho cancellato la storia di alcuni edifici, presterò più attenzione. In alcuni è stato necessario perché gli edifici non esistevano oppure erano mappati male. Per quanto riguarda cercherò di stare più attento, ancora non sono molto bravo a gestirli. Ho cercato di prendere spunto da altre zone della mia città per quanto riguarda la creazione di alcune aree. Ho dovuto fare queste puntualizzazione all'utente in quanto non rispecchiano la realtà. Poi magari sbaglio
Map47 (2024-07-29 15:13:20+00:00): @Odra_99 Grazie per la puntualizzazione, non avevo considerato il tag "marciapiede". 
Ho diviso il percorso in due segmenti, il marciapiede e il percorso pedonale che chiaramente è fittizio.
flohoff (2024-07-19 11:00:57+00:00): Moin,
das macht hier keinen sinn landuse UND natural zu taggen.

Flo
Odra_99 (2024-07-27 06:29:42+00:00): It's wrong, there are not grass. Please stop to edit. I leave in this quarter, I know what to edit
Map47 (2024-07-27 14:18:08+00:00): Buon giorno,
Ho cercato di ovviare alle segnalazioni di OSMI riguardo ai dati da te inseriti.
Hai inserito un'area pedonale come membro interno di un multipoligono senza definire il perimetro esterno.
Dalle foto satellitari pare che la zona alberata sia delimitata da cordoli.
Essendo queste zone ai bordi dell'area inserita non possono far parte di una relazione.
L'area pedonale inserita non risultava collegata alla rete viaria.
Ho apportato le modifiche opportune per ovviare alle segnalazioni di OSMI, se le modifiche apportate non rispettano la realtà evidentemente i dati inseriti sono stati insufficienti.
Cordialmente.
Map47 (2024-07-28 05:19:21+00:00): Rimosse aree verdi inesistenti.
BCNorwich (2024-07-21 06:47:36+00:00): Hi, This platform is already mapped and is in a route relation, this is in the existing platform which you here partially duplicate. Please amend/correct existing mapping rather than drawing over it. Thus I've removed the duplicate.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2024-07-20 05:19:07+00:00): Removed, as platform 1 alreaddy mapped as relation on other platform line.
woodpeck_repair (2024-07-19 10:17:38+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 152737390, 152745302, 152745688, 152745714, 152749592, 152750219, 152752399, 152752626, 152752744, 152984221, 152984625, 152985076, 152985486, 152985701, 152986005, 153011040, 153012491, 153012524, 153012637, 153012714, 153012810, 153020079, 153020159, 153020206, 153020366, 153021557, 153021880, 153022543, 153022653, 153022710, 153029278, 153029476, 153029790, 153029848, 153029910, 153030100, 153036897, 153044033, 153045684, 153052984, 153053008, 153053017, 153053058, 153053198, 153053215, 153053221, 153053236, 153053250, 153053285, 153334133, 153334172, 153334188, 153334243, 153334274, 153334300, 153334314, 153334360, 153334385, 153345408, 153345445, 153345579, 153345652, 153345670, 153345702, 153345726, 153345785, 153345811, 153345828, 153345884, 153345898, 153345934, 153345949, 153345970, 153345999, 153346030, 153346094, 153346120, 153346184, 153346232, 153346267, 153346295, 153347268, 153347279, 153347304, 153347405, 153364894, 153364920, 153364989, 153379899, 153383313, 153383656, 153383667, 153383675, 153383701, 153383709, 153383715, 153383737, 153383742, 153383750, 153383780, 153383791, 153383797, 153383802, 153383807, 153383820, 153383869, 153383874, 153383876, 153383881, 153383886, 153403844, 153403869, 153404012, 153404161, 153410472, 153466853, 153472600, 153555067, 153555364, 153555391, 153555433, 153556559, 153572693, 153587079, 153587217, 153587316, 153587417, 153587912, 153598838, 153614407, 153630988, 153666748, 153675818, 153690840, 153691058, 153691551, 153691619, 153692455, 153692832, 153692980, 153693002, 153693484, 153731443, 153731560, 153731597, 153731642, 153731724, 153731771, 153829753, 153832889, 153833154, 153833303, 153833902, 153858635, 153859496, 153866916, 153867653, 153869658, 153869844, 153870276, 153894550, 153896894, 153896945, 153897086, 153897185, 153897220, 153897314, 153897379, 153897452, 153897481, 153897512, 153897630, 153897859, 153897936, 153897986, 153905157, 153905472, 153906182, 153912310, 153912966, 153913008, 153913035, 153913287, 153913476, 153913493, 153913867, 153914007, 153914019, 153914043, 153914052, 153914078, 153914085, 153914093, 153914107, 153914110, 153914135, 153915687, 153916562, 153916648, 153916672, 153916690, 153916744, 153929330, 153929358, 153932390, 153932467, 153948649, 153948668, 153993776, 153995700, 153995715, 153995734, 153995802, 153995862, 153995895, 153995917, 153996042, 153996049, 153996093, 153996135, 153996188, 153996277, 153996316, 153996323, 153996330, 153996348, 154004237, 154005361, 154005416, 154006237, 154016178, 154016265, 154038776, 154073705, 154074520, 154074527, 154074534, 154074773, 154104057, 154114554, 154115428.
Frans S (2024-07-19 10:36:17+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, buildings not squared. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154136983
Frans S (2024-07-19 10:34:43+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Buildings not accurate drawn (oversized)
Buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154137121
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-19 21:50:29+00:00): Why was oneway=no added to roundabouts?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154137183
kapazao (2024-07-20 07:55:44+00:00): Hello, that was a mistake when I aplied a filter. I have fixed it.
Thank you for your warning. I hope you can uncheck the bad review.
Regards
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-20 20:52:46+00:00): Removed. Please don't add cruft like oneway=no to any roads unless it might be implied otherwise
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154137183
jleedev (2024-07-20 21:44:41+00:00): Reference — https://files.paturnpike.com/production/docs/ptcconstructionsiteslibraries/mon-fayette---section-53a1/december-4-2023-mfe-weekly-construction-update.pdf

“Drivers traveling to southbound PA Turnpike 43 will experience a lane shift at the ramp on Jefferson Boulevard. Traffic has been shifted to the northbound ramp. Once over the bridge, traffic on the ramp will cross back over to southbound side. Drivers traveling southbound from southbound SR 51 need to stop at the end of the ramp before moving onto Jefferson Boulevard.”
smikhnouski_lyft (2024-07-22 12:32:08+00:00): Hi, jleedev!

My name is Stepan and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. 
On the changeset I modified the geometry of the motorway according to the Lyft-owned background, GPS tracks, and street-level images. 
The access to the Mon/Fayette Expressway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1302471898) is possible only from the westbound direction of Jefferson Boulevard, which became bidirectional due the construction works. (See satellite image https://drive.google.com/file/d/1u4VqngiwEnmhdKQt173x8QWWoqWzkQDo/view?usp=drive_link  and street level imagery https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AxcG4a0R5ZmixMOusS6mi2xlrjL_Go5b/view?usp=drive_link  taken at 40.29654, -79.91361). 
Northbound direction is divided into two directions till the https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12062931437 according to satellite imagery and GPS tracks (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GFoJBuNTlIbt_A7h3yzpKkGWSQ-N_BSR/view?usp=drive_link)
If you find any inaccuracies in my edits, please let me know what they are and it will be fixed.
Best regards, Stepan
jleedev (2024-07-22 13:01:36+00:00): Thanks for the images! For weird changes like long term construction, I try to add detail to my own changesets explaining what's happening and when, but that's hard to do consistently.
smikhnouski_lyft (2024-07-22 13:59:59+00:00): Thank you for your feedback and for sharing your approach! I agree that detailed explanations help clarify the situation, but it can indeed be challenging with  complex edits. However, we are always ready to share our evidence if needed.
mueschel (2024-08-10 10:55:54+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the access restrictions on this area? Currently this is a highway=pedestrian, that is not accessible for pedestrians.
Frans S (2024-07-19 10:50:59+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154137434
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-19 20:02:58+00:00): Changeset reviewed.  minor tag errors.  I have corrected them for you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154137547
hocu (2024-07-19 10:45:41+00:00): What I actually meant was if this restaurant is closed or not. Need :coffee:
RX14 (2024-07-22 12:19:44+00:00): Please do not change maxspeed for projects that are not finished. Please revert this change and use proposed:maxspeed or do not change it. Also consider linking sources for news along with your change.
A Trainspotter from Berkshire (2024-07-22 14:56:59+00:00): The line speed upgrades have been done as part of the Feltham & Wokingham resignalling project. Link to surrey country council website = https://www.surreycc.gov.uk/land-planning-and-development/development/surrey-future/the-surrey-rail-strategy and link to network rail website about Feltham and Wokingham resignalling = https://www.networkrail.co.uk/running-the-railway/our-routes/wessex/feltham-and-wokingham-re-signalling-programme/
RX14 (2024-07-22 15:15:59+00:00): Hi, thanks for correcting me! I didn't imagine that a resignalling project around wokingham is affecting the north downs line between guildford and reigate
berndw (2024-07-21 06:39:05+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen bei Openstreetmap.

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag, aber ich habe eine Frage.

Ist der Gyros Grill immer noch vorhanden?

Wenn nein, sollte der POI entfernt werden

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6792285647

Bei Fragen einfach auf die Nachricht antworten
Bierhaus2024 (2024-07-22 07:43:47+00:00): Hallo, 
der Gyros Grill ist nicht mehr vorhanden. Wie kann ich den POI entfernen?
Vielen lieben Dank für den Hinweis. 
Beste Grüße
berndw (2024-07-22 14:06:40+00:00): Einfach den Bereich im Editor, z.B. mit iD, öffnen und den Knoten löschen.

Ich kann das aber auch machen ;-)
flohoff (2024-07-19 12:31:03+00:00): Moin,
ist das richtig das die Heeserstraße unter der Bahn komplett unbenutzbar ist aktuell ?

Deine änderung hat diese routingänderung zur folge gehabt:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=675203,806789

Flo
trolf03 (2024-07-19 12:40:48+00:00): Hallo,
ja, unter der Bahn ist komplett dicht. Von Norden (Tiergartenstr.) kommt man auf der Heeserstr. noch bis zum ersten Parkplatz. Absperrung von Süden (aus Richtung Sandstr.) ist irgendwo zwischen letzter Grundstückszufahrt und Bahnbrücke.
flohoff (2024-07-19 15:37:56+00:00): 
Und wie lange wird das so sein ? Gibts da Presseveröffentlichungen?


Flo
trolf03 (2024-07-31 08:25:01+00:00): Grober Zeitrahmen: Ein Jahr

https://www.siegen-stadt.de/meldungen/detail/an-der-sieg-geh-und-radweg-teilstueck-zwischen-siegen-und-weidenau-gesperrt/
MKnight (2024-07-19 19:36:42+00:00): Ääh, moin.

Ich sehe hier nach Deiner Änderung, keine Änderung für ÖPNV, sondern nur komplette Löschung von Abbiegerestriktionen.
2 Sachen dazu:
1. zum ausschliessen gibt es in den Relationen das except (ausser)
2. Eine Umleitung ist mutmasslich temporär, da ist das Löschen von Relationen eher unüblich.

Wie ist denn dort die genaue Situation?
whb (2025-09-12 11:51:40+00:00): Guten Tag,

stimmt das bicycle=no hier wirklich?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40237306/history

Viele Grüße
whb
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-19 11:20:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12062968552

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
maroonk (2024-07-19 11:49:48+00:00): Witam, bardzo dziekuję za informację, jestem początkujacy, poprawiłem na wzór innych paczkomatów, mam nadzieję że prawidłowo. Pozdrawiam
NorthCrab (2024-07-19 12:04:17+00:00): Hej, Teraz jest poprawnie! Wielkie dzięki za edycję mapy :-)
n!kvfltu (2024-07-19 14:06:45+00:00): Merci, c'est super !
mcliquid (2024-07-19 11:47:01+00:00): I have nothing against the edit per se, but may I question how useful it is to put a Google Maps link in OpenStreetMap as a web page?
guerda (2024-07-19 12:04:13+00:00): I have the same concern. For me it does not make much sense and should be considered for removal. I just updated the URL to avoid losing that information due to the shutdown of goo.gl.
Tatti Barletta (2024-07-20 07:23:24+00:00): From the wiki: "The website=* tag is used to provide the full URL to the official website for the related feature". Anything on Google Maps is obviously not an official website, so it should be removed. Facebook links, as already mentioned, have their own tag and should be moved there.
Frans S (2024-07-19 12:09:29+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings
C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.
G: Included the shadow of the building .
H: Included a yard of clearing.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154139721
Frans S (2024-07-19 12:11:11+00:00): Sorry to send this message twice .
Please also solve the issues shown by the issue triangle in ID editor.
Piz Pachific (2024-07-19 13:56:19+00:00): Seems to have wrong data -> reverted with changeset 154144699
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-19 20:01:36+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

You requested a review of this changeset. I have reviewed your changeset and found it to be good. Keep up the great changesets, and I look forward to seeing you around.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154140661
eggie (2024-07-19 15:56:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Frans S (2024-07-20 10:33:41+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------

A: Inaccurate mapping.

C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.

E: Buildings not squared.



Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154140988
user_14134328 (2024-07-30 23:38:22+00:00): 请问您为何要将支路，次干路及主干路修改为居民区道路？
Sylvain M (2025-09-16 13:46:04+00:00): Salut @Emeltet 😀
Pour info, concernant le lien Wikidata des espèces, il est préférable d'utiliser la clé "species:wikidata" (et pas "wikidata", car ce serait dans ce cas l'élément wikidata de l'arbre pris individuellement, arbre remarquable par exemple).

Cf. cet échange par exemple au sujet des Platanes : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/arbres-et-especes-hybrides-botanique-taxonomie-cas-du-platane-commun

En tout cas, chouette que tu cartographies les arbres sur OSM 👍
Emeltet (2025-09-17 08:51:36+00:00): Merci Sylvain pour cette précision, j'en tiendrai compte à l'avenir
ivanbranco (2026-03-13 11:43:17+00:00): Hi Emeltet,

there are still at least 338 trees with an incorrect wikipedia value. The tag links to a species page instead of a specific specimen. Do you plan to fix them?

Thanks, and happy mapping.
Emeltet (2026-03-14 10:40:20+00:00): Hi ivanbranco
My goal is to allow users to learn about the species, not the individual specimen. Is that a problem ?
ivanbranco (2026-03-14 11:00:40+00:00): Is not a problem, but the proper tag is species:wikipedia=*, not wikipedia=*, as explained in the first comment.

An example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9860861396
this element should have
species:wikipedia=fr:Fraxinus angustifolia
instead of
wikipedia=fr:Fraxinus angustifolia
Emeltet (2026-03-14 11:14:46+00:00): OK
eggie (2024-07-19 16:08:43+00:00): Dag Mike
access=yes hoort niet op wegen.
Ook bicycle en foot =yes hoort niet op een fietspad.
Tagging voor verschillende fietspaden Zie:
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a 
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 

 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-07-19 16:11:26+00:00): access=yes en bicycle=yes heb ik verwijderd.
Wellicht maakt de editor van no>yes

MVG
eggie
LockOnGuy (2024-07-19 14:15:36+00:00): Thank you. keep up the good work.
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-19 20:00:58+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

You requested a review of this changeset. I have reviewed your changeset and found it to be good. Keep up the great changesets, and I look forward to seeing you around.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154142299
eggie (2024-07-19 16:03:41+00:00): Dag Mike, Gebruik in principe een bestaande adresnode.  In OSM is de format van postcode zonder spatie.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-07-19 16:04:56+00:00): Ik merged your info with the addressnode.
Gr eggie
aixbrick (2024-07-19 19:52:12+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
was genau ist der Zweck dieses Nodes, da die Halle bereits eintragen ist: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45352343/?
Gruß
AndiWis (2024-07-20 09:47:24+00:00): Hallo,
mir geht es eigentlich nur um eine Kennzeichnung des Gebäudes als "Sporthalle Schulzentrum Aachen-Laurensberg", da wir die Halle im Winter für das Training unserer Fußballjugend nutzen dürfen und wir einen Kartenausschnitt auf unsere Webseite stellen möchten.
Gruß
AndiWis
aixbrick (2024-07-20 11:05:52+00:00): Nutze dazu bitte uMap: https://umap.openstreetmap.de/. Damit kannst du z.B. eine Karte mit persönlichen Markern erstellen und diese auf einer Website einbinden.
aixbrick (2024-07-27 16:41:19+00:00): Node wieder gelöscht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154492320
Discostu36 (2024-08-12 19:28:47+00:00): Bitte entferne keine korrekten Informationen von der Karte, um Änderungen an der Darstellung zu erzwingen.
Discostu36 (2024-08-12 19:36:19+00:00): Entschuldige, ich habe mir das nochmal angesehen und eigentlich passt der Name ja eher zu dem Wohnblock statt zu dem Gebäude. Ich habe das angepasst.
Discostu36 (2024-08-12 19:37:55+00:00): Im normalen Kartenstil ist die Hausnummer jetzt trotzdem nicht zu sehen, aber das macht nichts, das ist nur eine von vielen Visualisierungen der Daten.
martried (2024-07-20 07:54:29+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Zusammenfassung. Ich habe nicht an allen Gebäuden die Plakette gefunden. Deswegen fehlen welche, aber hier ist der Plan: https://www.schifferstadt.de/tourismus/schifferstadt-erleben/historischer-stadtrundgang/historischerstadtrundgang-druckversion.pdf

Außerdem befindet sich der Startpunkt hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10197180948
limes11 (2024-07-20 08:48:41+00:00): Hallo Heiner, 

es sollte noch ergänzt werden, wer mit dem Auto durch die Fahrradstraße fahren darf. Default ist vehicle=no.

motor_vehicle=yes/destination ?

VG
HeinerSchaefer (2024-07-20 09:56:55+00:00): Hallo Limes,
das ist mir aufgefallen als ich es eintrug.
Allerdings ist mir vor Ort kein Zusatzschild aufgefallen.
Auch die kurze Unterbrechnung an der Einmündung der Str. "Ennerthang" ist noch nicht ausgeschildert. Allerdings ist da die rote Seitenmarkierung unterbrochen.

Ich werde mir das in den nächsten Tagen nochmal ansehen und dann nachtragen.
Ggf. ist aber auch noch nicht vollständig beschildert?

Grüße
Heiner
limes11 (2024-07-20 10:22:18+00:00): Klingt danach, als wäre die Beschilderung noch nicht vollständig. Zumindest die Anwohner haben immer das Recht zu ihren Häusern zu kommen. Danke Dir !