piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2023-02-23 13:08:20+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator,during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. therefore, I inform you  about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Each building need to be squared.
Nodes of buildings may not connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132903485
Frans S (2023-02-23 13:08:41+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Please adjust wrong positioned buildings as well
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132903485
Glassman (2023-02-23 18:24:48+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132903589
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:12:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
Glassman (2023-02-23 18:29:48+00:00): From looking at counties records, I'd guess that those are service roads around an apartment complex. Residential roads typically have names in Washington State.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132903742
stringcheezze (2023-02-25 19:50:01+00:00): I will fix this!
emersonveenstra (2023-03-01 19:33:07+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for contributing to the map!

Just as a note, road names aren't supposed to be abbreviated (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(don't_do_it)). Would you mind fixing the road names? Thanks!
watmildon (2023-03-31 03:32:09+00:00): I have added address information for this area and corrected the abbreviated street names as part of this project: https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/377

Happy mapping.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
Nakaner-repair (2024-04-12 08:58:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149899818 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Lersan due to suspected vandalism/being MAPS.ME junk data.
Glassman (2023-02-23 18:35:53+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132903982
stringcheezze (2023-02-25 19:49:37+00:00): Thank you!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
Nakaner-repair (2024-04-12 08:58:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149899818 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Lersan due to suspected vandalism/being MAPS.ME junk data.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-23 03:21:42+00:00): Please use changeset comments.  What did you change and why?
Matthew_Hanson (2023-02-23 12:25:52+00:00): Some buildings were done the wrong way, so I fixed them. Im Also added a traffic camera by the freeway. I put a lot of fire hydrants on the map. And added an address on to a house
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
muchichka_s (2023-02-23 09:12:09+00:00): Будь ласка не видаляйте точку "Промінь", без неї виникають проблеми адресації. І взагалі - Промінь не тільки житлова зона. Там ще є адреси на ринку і торгові будівлі

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=23.03251&lat=48.14226&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=buildings%2Cbuildings_with_addresses%2Cpostal_code%2Centrances_deprecated%2Centrances%2Cno_addr_street%2Cstreet_not_found%2Cplace_not_found%2Cmisformatted_housenumber_lenient%2Cnodes_with_addresses_defined%2Cnodes_with_addresses_interpolated%2Cinterpolation%2Cinterpolation_errors%2Cconnection_lines%2Cnearest_points%2Cnearest_roads%2Cnearest_areas%2Caddrx_on_nonclosed_way%2Cbuildings%2Cbuildings_with_addresses%2Cpostal_code%2Centrances_deprecated%2Centrances%2Cno_addr_street%2Cstreet_not_found%2Cplace_not_found%2Cmisformatted_housenumber_lenient%2Cnodes_with_addresses_defined%2Cnodes_with_addresses_interpolated%2Cinterpolation%2Cinterpolation_errors%2Cconnection_lines%2Cnearest_points%2Cnearest_roads%2Cnearest_areas%2Caddrx_on_nonclosed_way
sdvm (2023-02-23 15:29:44+00:00): Добреї зрозумів
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
Baloo Uriza (2023-02-23 13:01:52+00:00): Splitting this up by area and using a descriptive changeset comment would have probably been a bit advantageous with this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132904291
bradrh (2023-02-24 22:15:52+00:00): +1.  Plx keep your changeset confined to a smaller area
cmmartinez (2023-03-19 18:22:51+00:00): Hola, podrá cambiar o quitar el nombre de "Juegos de agua" al lugar? ya que la fuente es un espacio dentro del nombre que debería tener la etiqueta, el cual es es "Parque de Flora Nativa Benito Quinquela Martín"
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-23 01:10:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687255882

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Patryk2710 (2023-02-25 20:21:45+00:00): cześć! wydaje mi się, że psse jest po drugiej stronie budynku https://westnordost.de/p/131498.jpg
user_18536221 (2023-02-23 01:33:55+00:00): I would like someone to review my edits.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-23 01:41:08+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289663
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289664
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289665
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289666
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289667
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289732
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289733
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289734
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289735
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289736
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289737
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289738
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289739
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289740
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289741
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289742
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289743
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289744
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289745
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289746
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289747
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289804
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289806
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289807
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289808
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289809
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289810
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289811
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289812
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289848
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289849
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687290089

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2023-02-23 18:48:48+00:00): Błędy zostały poprawione. Bardzo fajny bot! Mam tylko jedną prośbę - przy dużych zestawach zmian taka lista jest bardzo długa i wymaga przeklikania się przez wszystkie linki, żeby czegoś nie pominąć. Czy mógłbyś dodać po każdym linku nazwę ulicy jakiej ten link dotyczy? W powyższym przypadku brakowało np. ulicy Klonowej i Brylantowej. Dodanie tych 2 ulic załatwiało większość błędów. Gdybym widział te nazwy w komentarzu, to nie musiałbym klikać wszystkich linków po kolei. Pozdrawiam, G_P_J
NorthCrab (2023-02-24 03:44:32+00:00): Da radę! Dzięki za sugestię :-)
aduxas (2025-05-04 15:36:08+00:00): From the OSM wiki: "The access=no tag indicates that the object is not to be used by the public, with stronger interdiction than the access=private tag."  Your changes indicate that even the residents cannot enter here.
Also, this particular segments is marked as public on https://www.axisgis.com/CoventryRI/ (between lots 103 and 104.)  The same is shown on the official town maps: https://coventryri.gov/sites/coventryri.gov/files/attachments/Complete_set_0.pdf
Also, there are no signs on site that restrict access to Sunset Lake Circle.
Glassman (2023-02-23 18:20:34+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132905733
mweper (2023-02-23 11:40:57+00:00): Hola. Ya te he comentado que aquí no existe ningún enlace en construcción todavía y que llegado su momento, lo estaré actualizando. 
Paso 2 veces por día por ese lugar y todavía no existe nada, por favor no modifiques los etiquetados sin antes corroborar físicamente su existencia. 
Gracias.
Frans S (2023-04-12 13:11:54+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
An observation:
You added many times a layer to an object without reason.
Please don't do that anymore.
If the reason is to get rid of an error, solve the error on another way, by adjusting the mapping which causes the error.
If you want to map more in the future, please take the time and map more accurate. 
Your mappings need much adjustments.
Best regards
fabiotofy (2023-02-23 06:53:03+00:00): sei sicuro che ora l'edificio è stato ampliato così tanto da inglobare anche tutte le aree parcheggio ? secondo me il capannone è rimasto delle medesime dimensioni di prima...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132906635
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-23 05:35:20+00:00): What type of confusion?  I am very familiar with this area.
gscholz (2023-02-24 07:14:18+00:00): Hi abebayehuz,
I have reverted this changeset to fix the errors discussed in your other contributions.

Here is view showing a part of the errors your imports create:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=38.62302&lat=8.97263&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Please have a look at our documentation about how to handle gps tracks properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Convert_GPS_tracks

Guido
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Muhmaker (2023-07-26 11:58:48+00:00): Hallo. Mir ist beim Editieren von Buslinien zufällig aufgefallen, dass du am Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119886632 oneway=yes gesetzt hast. Bei der Lage dieses Wegstücks im Straßen-Netz erscheint mir das sehr seltsam. Gab/gibt es dort eine Baustelle? Oder war es vielleicht ein Versehen?
Bienson (2023-08-19 21:54:51+00:00): Hi, das war ein Versehen. Habe die Kreuzung zweispurig überarbeitet.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
gscholz (2023-02-24 07:15:46+00:00): Hi abebayehuz,
I have reverted this changeset to fix the errors discussed in your other contributions.

Here is view showing a part of the errors your imports create:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=38.62302&lat=8.97263&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Please have a look at our documentation about how to handle gps tracks properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Convert_GPS_tracks

You may also like to educate yourself about how to add proppeer changeset comments:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Guido
Nakaner-repair (2024-04-12 08:59:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149899818 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Lersan due to suspected vandalism/being MAPS.ME junk data.
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-28 20:20:02+00:00): Was the address correct though?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132908142
archpdx (2023-02-28 20:26:35+00:00): NAD suggests that this building is 421, not 419
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-28 20:32:49+00:00): Ok, so unsure at least.  That's fine.
 Just had to ask!
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].