piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2023-10-25 11:34:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143091648, 143096135, 143079325, 143088884, 143103208, 143085301 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2023-10-25 11:34:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143091648, 143096135, 143079325, 143088884, 143103208, 143085301 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2023-10-25 11:34:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143091648, 143096135, 143079325, 143088884, 143103208, 143085301 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2023-10-25 11:34:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143091648, 143096135, 143079325, 143088884, 143103208, 143085301 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2023-10-25 11:34:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143091648, 143096135, 143079325, 143088884, 143103208, 143085301 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2023-10-25 11:35:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143091648, 143096135, 143079325, 143088884, 143103208, 143085301 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2023-10-25 11:34:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143091648, 143096135, 143079325, 143088884, 143103208, 143085301 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2023-10-25 11:33:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143091648, 143096135, 143079325, 143088884, 143103208, 143085301 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2023-10-25 11:34:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143091648, 143096135, 143079325, 143088884, 143103208, 143085301 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2023-10-25 11:35:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143091648, 143096135, 143079325, 143088884, 143103208, 143085301 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2023-10-25 11:34:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143091648, 143096135, 143079325, 143088884, 143103208, 143085301 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2023-10-25 11:35:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143091648, 143096135, 143079325, 143088884, 143103208, 143085301 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2023-10-25 11:34:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143091648, 143096135, 143079325, 143088884, 143103208, 143085301 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2023-10-25 11:34:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143091648, 143096135, 143079325, 143088884, 143103208, 143085301 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2023-10-25 11:34:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143091648, 143096135, 143079325, 143088884, 143103208, 143085301 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
gscholz (2023-10-26 06:47:30+00:00): Hi Mohammed ,
this changeset has left behind self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=21.81872&lat=32.79176&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143079186

Can you please fix this?
Guido
Eman_Mehrez (2023-10-26 14:09:50+00:00): Hello gscholz;
I fixed this issue.
Regards
Eman Mehrez
Hannes Röst (2023-10-25 20:47:20+00:00): Hi, this seemed to have broken the coastline. I have reverted this change
matheusgomesms (2023-10-28 14:08:23+00:00): Oi Denilson, tudo bem? Pode dar uma olhada no Telegram, por favor?
fititnt (2023-11-20 18:40:56+00:00): Olá! Seja bem vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap.

Poderia por favor explicar qual a fonte de referência para mover o https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4917865622/history#map=18/-29.41404/-51.96172 de lugar ?
mkopinsky (2023-10-25 00:22:10+00:00): Thanks for doing this! This looks intense but is super valuable.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143080808
KasperSFranz (2023-10-24 19:50:38+00:00): It was closed off today but new signs are up
maraf24 (2023-11-03 21:51:38+00:00): Wg mnie prawidłowym tutaj komentarzem byłoby "wycofanie własnych wandalizmów".
:)
silversurfer83 (2023-10-24 22:38:28+00:00): Hi :)

Details, wie eine Ladestation sauber erfasst wird, findest du übrigens hier
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143082460
Frans S (2023-10-25 09:17:29+00:00): Hello Arie.  Don't you have the online validation tool installed ?
It shows common errors like crossing buildings and roads, which can be solved before you upload your mappings.
Best regards
Arie den Boon (2023-10-25 10:48:47+00:00): Hi Frans, Yes I have the validation tool installed. I always solve the validating issues before uploading or before Agreeing in the task manager. Did I miss some errors? Best regards
Frans S (2023-10-25 14:37:51+00:00): Hi Arie,  just a few nodes of buildings connected to other objects. (Highway)
The inline validating tool finds them, as well as overlapping buildings
Best regards
flohoff (2023-10-24 22:06:37+00:00): Moin
ich glaube hier kannst du für Potthoff eher "name" statt "operator". 

operator wäre eher richtig für einen großen Parkplatz den die hätten.

Flo
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-09 18:48:08+00:00): Skąd tą nazwę Ogrody Łobzów się udało znaleźć? Szukałem jakiś czas temu i mi się nie udało
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 15:18:12+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11287167792/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop?
Natasha_Zhovner (2023-12-20 14:05:39+00:00): Hello it seems that you removed actual road. Please take a closer look and make a revert.
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/402273129
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-11-06 01:46:20+00:00): porque removeu a via de serviço da conibase?
Mari Leal (2023-11-07 11:20:26+00:00): Olá! Pq esse caminho é apenas para funcionarios, clientes não precisam ter acesso e circular dentro do condominio
paul1928 (2023-10-25 07:36:53+00:00): Hi Chrissooo. Can you please include edit notes when making changes. Thanks
paul1928 (2023-10-26 00:17:13+00:00): Hi Chrissooo, can you please confirm this track has been destroyed/removed from the ground? Otherwise simply deleting it is not the correct approach to removing it from the map and someone will simply re-add it, making your problem worse
Chrissooo (2023-10-29 21:35:03+00:00): Hi Michael,
Yes this track has been closed. It has barriers in place and is in the process of naturally revegetating. While there is still a visible scar in the landscape, this track will be allowed to grow over on its own. These tracks need to no longer be visible on OSM for general viewing, so if there is a better way to change the track data than deleting it please feel free to assist us in protecting this area from continued use. 
Thankyou
anakes (2023-11-01 23:36:56+00:00): Mensaje de Aviso: Se solicita a "Inda19" que detenga temporalmente sus actividades hasta que se revisen detenidamente las modificaciones cartográficas realizadas. Se ha observado que estas modificaciones interpretan incorrectamente el uso de delimitaciones público-administrativas en el "layer Meadow" (pastizales), lo que está generando problemas en otras plataformas que utilizan OpenStreetMap. Agradecemos su cooperación y comprensión mientras trabajamos para resolver esta cuestión y garantizar la integridad de los datos cartográficos.
anakes (2023-11-01 23:37:16+00:00): Warning Message: "Inda19" is kindly requested to temporarily halt their activities until a thorough review of the cartographic modifications is conducted. It has come to our attention that these modifications misinterpret the use of public administrative boundaries within the "Meadow" layer, causing issues for other platforms utilizing OpenStreetMap. We appreciate your cooperation and understanding as we work to address this matter and ensure the integrity of the cartographic data.
JakeTheMoose (2023-10-25 17:01:30+00:00): Hi @ConnorGa,

I understand there is no sidewalk here, but the Municipal code of Chicago 9-60-080 allows pedestrian access where there are no sidewalks.

See MUNICIPAL CODE OF CHICAGO
9-60-080 Walking along roadways.
   (a)   Where sidewalks are provided it shall be unlawful for a pedestrian to walk along and upon an adjacent roadway.
   (b)   Where sidewalks are not provided any pedestrian walking along and upon a roadway shall when practicable walk only on the left side of the roadway or its shoulder facing traffic that may approach from the opposite direction.

Can you please revert the change?

Thank you,
JakeTheMoose
ConnorGa (2023-10-25 18:41:34+00:00): Hi Jake,

Sure, will do. With no shoulder and concrete barriers I thought this wasn't walkable, but your point is well taken.

-ConnorGa
JakeTheMoose (2023-10-25 19:01:35+00:00): Thank you ConnorGa
user_18760664 (2023-10-25 04:27:26+00:00): Is that building really called Douglas Road?
user_18760664 (2023-10-25 04:29:39+00:00): I think the name tag can be removed
HellMap (2023-10-27 11:46:16+00:00): Sveiki!

Šādi dalot krustojumu mazos gabaliņos jābūt uzmanīgam ar relācijām. Piemēram, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12744931 tagad ir posmi pa gandrīz visiem ceļiem abos krustojumos.
kubahahaha (2023-10-25 00:03:01+00:00): Tutaj chyba ktoś kartofle hoduje xD
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11287257087

Tutaj coś nie tak z duplikatem (jeden dodany, istniejący edytowany):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11287257091
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3647537895

---
Daj znać czy można to poprawiać czy potrzebujesz spojrzeć
NorthCrab (2023-10-25 12:22:47+00:00): Poprawiłem i zapisałem w issues, https://github.com/Zaczero/osm-yolo-crossings/issues/1 https://github.com/Zaczero/osm-yolo-crossings/issues/4. Dziękuję :-)
5m4u9 (2023-10-25 00:41:31+00:00): Hello, the airport area includes part of the airport access road, as it was before.
Human1each (2023-10-25 21:33:08+00:00): Hello 5m4u9, thank you for your contribution and input regarding the boundary of the aerodrome! While there is a fence line shared by the public airport and nearby military area, the OSM wiki states that an aerodrome is, “A place from which flight operations take place. Term includes airports, aerodromes, airfields, and landing strips whether international, private, military, or otherwise” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aeroways). The roads accessing the airport terminal are not a part of where flight operations are occurring, therefore, I have not included them in the aerodrome boundary. 

Thank you, and happy mapping!
5m4u9 (2023-10-26 01:45:03+00:00): Hi, Under that reasoning... why public car parking is excluded & private car parkings are included within the area?  🤔🤔🤔
Human1each (2023-10-26 21:41:41+00:00): My decision to not exclude the parking area (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240341905) from the aerodrome was based on its vicinity to the military feature (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/772045900). Reviewing Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=272903452003597), I find that your suggestion of excluding this parking area from the aerodrome is a good choice. I have gone ahead and adjusted the aerodrome.

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2023-10-25 05:42:13+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1160117192 and https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:payment:* . What is your interpretation of the tag payment=offsite?
Davie Dean (2023-10-25 22:08:03+00:00): My intention was that it indicated that payment is not available onsite. The wiki is not clear on how to indicate that, so this seemed a good placeholder until/if a better way of tagging is available.
user_5359 (2023-10-27 05:01:26+00:00): With the key fee it would be indicated that costs arise and since these must also be claimed, an invoice is usually also necessary. therefore I would suggest a combination of
fee=yes
payment:invoice=yes
.
Davie Dean (2023-10-27 20:50:08+00:00): I have no idea how payments are taken, but I know they aren't taken on site, so this tagging is fine for now.
PLima785 (2023-10-25 12:51:00+00:00): Boas
Não metas farmyard pois é para parte de quintas. Ve exemplos na Rua Vilarinho de Baixo.
Nomes de quintas ficam nos edifícios
ticki_52 (2023-10-25 07:32:32+00:00): Die von Dir getaggte Fläche ist nur z.T. "residential". Es sind definitiv einige landwirtschaftliche Betriebe als landuse="farmyard" zu taggen.
welzheimerwald (2023-10-25 11:01:24+00:00): Die Geometrie, also die räumliche Lage und Ausdehnung der Fläche, war gar nicht Bestandteil dieses Änderungssatzes. Hab nur die Tags in einen eigenen Node ausgelagert.
ticki_52 (2023-10-25 11:22:54+00:00): Der Weiler Muthof ist kein "village", sondern ein "hamlet"
welzheimerwald (2023-10-25 11:44:57+00:00): Warum schreibst du das nicht demjenigen, der "place_village" für Muthof eingeführt hat?

Kleiner Tipp: Es war in CS #32144076
ticki_52 (2023-10-25 12:35:41+00:00): Ich weiß, dass das schon von Anfang an als landuse=residential und place=village erfasst war. Wir wissen es besser und OSM könnte ein kleines bisschen an Datenqaulität gewinnen, wenn das nun korrgiert wird. Machst Du das oder soll ich das machen, wenn ich die Buslinien wieder hergestellt habe?
welzheimerwald (2023-10-25 13:04:22+00:00): Wenn du es machst, schau dir auch noch Schleierhof und Büschelhof an, die liegen größentechnisch in der selben Siedlungskategorie.

Und was mit den Buslinien nicht stimmen soll, hast du mir leider immer noch nicht genannt.
ticki_52 (2023-10-25 13:52:39+00:00): Höfe mach ich...

Warum hab ich Dir das mit dem ÖPNV noch nicht gesschrieben? Weil es nicht mit 2 Sätzen zu erklären ist. Ich versuch's halt mal. Das Dilemma fängt damit an, dass fleißige OSM-Mapper Bushaltestellen (stops & platforms) verändern, löschen und hinzufügen, ohne zu beachten, dass Buslinien wie Rad- oder Wanderrouten über Relationen zusammengehalten werden. Die lückenlose Reihenfolge der Wegsegmente ist Voraussetzung für ein funktionierendes Routing.  Schon das Verschieben von Bus-Stops auf einer Straße (Veränderung der Koordinaten) gilt als Fehler. Diese Fehler werden routinemäßig jede Nacht gesammelt und im Protokoll PTNA (Public Transport Network Analysis) ausgegeben. Das checke ich dann für die Buslinien VVS 2nn und 3nn des Rems-Murr-Kreises (und angrenzende Kreise). Der iD-Editor (browserbasiert) eignet sich nicht, um ÖPNV-Linien zu bearbeiten. Dazu muss der JOSM (javabasiert) verwendet werden. In JOSM können die Routen und deren Segmentreihenfolge bearbeitet und Fehler behoben werden. Alledings ist das recht zeitaufwendig. Ich hatte schon Fälle, wo Buslinien so verwirrt wurden, dass diese nicht repariert werden konnten und komplett neu erfasst werden mussten. Ich war jetzt zwei Stunden zugange, die 3 Buslinien wieder herzustellen. Kritisch sind vor allem die Auftrennungen von Straßensegmenten, die Buslinien beeinhalten. Wenn Du noch Fragen hast... nur zu.
welzheimerwald (2023-10-25 18:34:13+00:00): Ich möchte nichts gegen dein Engagement hier im RMK einwenden. Zu den Buslinien sei aber gesagt, dass diese zuvor fehlerhaft gemappt waren: Eine Buslinien-Relation des 339er hatte in Schwaikheim z.B. die Haltestellen auf der falschen Straßenseite als Mitglied. In Plüderhausen waren noch die veralteten Linienverläufe mit nicht mehr existenten Bushaltestellen drin, die teilweise schon seit 5 Jahren nicht mehr befahren werden.

Die Verläufe der Buslinien ergeben sich aus dem Linienzug aller aufeinanderfolgend beteiligten Ways. Warum der ID-Editor das nicht gebacken kriegt? Keine Ahnung. Hättest du den Changeset jedenfalls komplett revertiert, wärst du definitiv länger als zwei Stunden drangesessen, um die Buslinien auf den jetzigen aktuellen Stand zu bringen.

Ach ja, der Key „highway=bus_stop” gehört nicht zu den Nodes mit „public_transport=stop_position“ (Straße), sondern zu „public_transport=platform“ (wo das H-Schild steht).

Und warum du Crispenhofen mit 450 Einwohnern zum Weiler heruntergestuft hast, verstehe ich ebenfalls nicht.
silversurfer83 (2023-10-24 22:35:04+00:00): Hi Fabian :)

OpenStreetMap ist eine Geodatenbank die täglich von Millionen Menschen genutzt wird und diese NutzerInnen verlassen sich darauf, dass die Daten, die sie nutzen auch korrekt von uns erfasst wurden.

Daher wäre es schön, wenn du bitte keine Tests in die Datenbank schreiben würdest.

Wir würden uns freuen, wenn du das, was du selbst siehst und was noch nicht korrekt in der Datenbank verzeichnet ist, ordentlich erfassen würdest.

Wie das geht erklärt dir das Wiki und wir. Du findest die Community unter anderem im Forum unter c.osm.org oder in einer der vielen Chatgruppen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers

Außerdem kann ich zum Einstieg folgende Seiten empfehlen:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Map_Features
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Bei Fragen immer raus damit und bitte nicht an den Daten herumspielen, nur damit irgendeine Simulation besser funktioniert. Das machen Pokemon Go, MS Flight Simulator und Golf Spieler schon zu genüge ;)
LakeTana (2023-10-31 00:42:22+00:00): Hello Cleiton Mendes,
I noticed that you had remodeled the intersection in this area. I would like to point out that both Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1840951329397684), KartaView (https://kartaview.org/map/@-16.655590337479936,-49.247016065666116,19z), and recent aerial imagery indicate that the connection (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1218127584) between the dual carriage road is actually not in existence as there is a grass median and no signs of construction. The direction of the oneway lane leading up to that segment (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128976023) is against the flow of traffic on Avenida Vereador José Monteiro (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919354654) and would create an unsafe maneuver even if there was a break in the median. All available evidence, including vehicle directions observed in ground and aerial imagery, contradicts the direction you've specified. Further, this would indicate https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1216672772 would have to support both directions of traffic and is not a oneway.

Is it possible the city map mentioned in this changeset comment is somewhat outdated or incorrect at this particular location?
If you strongly believe your edits reflect the current configuration of the intersection it would be appreciated if someone could survey the entrance and exit lanes and take Mapillary images to upload for the benefit of the larger OSM community. This would aid in making sure reversions in the modeling are less likely in the future.
Thank you for your time and have a good day!
Cleiton Mendes (2023-10-31 01:03:20+00:00): Hello everything is fine?! These changes that I made reflect the current situation, it is because this city is undergoing several changes in traffic that does not have an updated satellite map. These changes that I made in this place were made 2 weeks ago, and have already been changed in Waze, where I have also been an editor for many years. So don't worry, this region is all correct, my changes correspond to the current reality.
LakeTana (2023-11-01 20:34:28+00:00): I appreciate the response. Thank you for explaining the situation at the intersection.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-30 08:45:28+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3951455 co do https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11287338289 ?
kubahahaha (2023-10-30 08:54:23+00:00): Widziałem i trochę nie wiem co z tym zrobić - faktycznie nie umiem znaleźć potwierdzenia że dokładnie tam jest źródło, ale dodawałem uwagi od jednego użytkownika (chyba, były utworzone w jednej okolicy i podobnym czasie). Pozostałe uwagi się zgadzały, ten teren jest obfity w źródła, zwłaszcza w okolicy stromych skarp, a dodatkowo woda w tej części stawu wygląda na czystą - tak jakby coś tam faktycznie wypływało zapewniając ruch i broniąc przed zarastaniem.
Poszukam jeszcze w wolnej chwili czy nigdzie w sieci nie ma wspomnienia o tym źródle
iandees (2023-10-25 14:59:47+00:00): Same thing here. This is County Road E, not County Road East.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143086270
jaap de vries (2023-10-27 13:02:42+00:00): Je geeft gras aan maar in de punt en verder bij de parkeerplaats zijn er Acer campestre hagen.
jaap de vries (2023-10-27 13:03:43+00:00): En bij de parkeerplaats ook nog andere hagen, Carpinus betulus
iandees (2023-10-25 14:57:58+00:00): Thanks for working on expanding road names, but please be careful to not expand roads that are named with letters, like "E Street" in this changeset.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143086601
TheSwavu (2023-10-27 00:13:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted because it broke the boundary of Port Phillip Bay Coastal Reserve (COM)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143187224
Glassman (2023-10-25 02:37:37+00:00): I removed the duplicate way. with a roundabout, the ways should connect to the roundabout as they do.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143086852
TheSwavu (2023-10-27 00:12:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted because it broke the boundary of Thirty-Two Mile Nature Conservation Reserve

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143187209
map per (2023-10-31 14:48:18+00:00): Hello Lizzie Boswell,

are you aware that the changes you make with Maps.me are uploaded to the public OpenStreetMap database?

"Bus back from Carhuaz" sounds quite like a private bookmark to me.

Best regards
map per

PS:
You can use the link in the e-mail to reply to my question.
Lizzie Boswell (2023-10-31 14:53:14+00:00): It is useful to me so that is why I added the bookmark and it might be useful to someone else.
map per (2023-10-31 15:28:53+00:00): Oh dear, and what is in this location? Is there a bus terminal like (1) or a bus stop like (2) or nothing at all?

(1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbus_station
(2) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop
Glassman (2023-10-26 22:43:08+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" - they will look much nicer.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143087681
Glassman (2023-10-26 22:48:26+00:00): Can you review these edits - it looks like duplicate libraries and a couple of the restaurants. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143087976
Noktoborus (2023-11-14 11:27:57+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Почему были удалены все соединения рек в озере? Например, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1163604911/history

Реки должны проходить через разливы/озёра для связности водных объектов.

Из описания правки непонятно что было сделано.
felipeeugenio (2023-10-25 15:09:52+00:00): gracias. Por favor no agregar addr:street a las plazas.

saludos
nevw (2023-10-25 03:34:10+00:00): If the business has moved to a different address you need to shift the node with the business details to the new site. Just changing the number doesn't work....it makes it now wrong at both sites now.
nevw (2023-10-27 12:30:46+00:00): No response, poi removed from old site of moved business.
SRMAdmin (2023-10-29 22:48:59+00:00): Sorry for the mistake - I wasn't quite sure how it worked. Are you able to assist me? I can't seem to find the business at the new address.