piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
one_half_3544 (2025-08-18 14:33:28+00:00): also, I'd suggest preserving the ways with tags like 'was:bridge=yes' (and probably check_date=dd/mm/yy) - otherwise it's hard to find the info in the history and, since those bridges are visible on the satellite images, someone might add them again
literan (2025-08-07 07:11:01+00:00): здравствуйте. я тут немного поправил траекторию РАЛ около Ильинской https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170090603#map=12/55.7853/37.3955&layers=N

ссылка на материал, которым руководствовался - в описании правки. Если это старье, скажите мне, я откачу
Alexey Lukin (2025-08-07 12:01:01+00:00): Здравствуйте! Спасибо. Я не знаю, чья схема актуальнее. Как появится котлован - станет понятно.
Alexey Lukin (2025-08-07 12:06:31+00:00): Моя информация вот отсюда: https://vk.com/wall-150643822_409961
Alexey Lukin (2025-12-15 02:35:52+00:00): Здравствуйте! Ваша правка устарела и не бьется с новыми космоснимками котлована. Можете ее откатить?
literan (2025-12-15 10:44:52+00:00): Добрый день. Отменить не получается - много конфликтов лезет, видимо после меня уже много правили. Так что лучше двигать точки
Alexey Lukin (2025-12-15 23:15:10+00:00): Ясно. Поправлю точки.
obache (2025-10-08 01:57:02+00:00): あなたが編集した時点で既に撤去されている、砂川の芳野橋の架け替えのための仮設橋を復活させないでください。

あなたが参考にした Bing の画像の状態からは工事が進んでいて、その変わった状態を既に反映していたものが古い状態に戻ってしまっています。

気付いたのはそこだけですが、他にもあるかもしれません。
felipeeugenio (2025-08-03 13:49:03+00:00): Hola Carlos. Estamos mirando tus ediciones de ayer sobre el barrio Yungay.
Te agradecemos tu tiempo y dedicación, pero hay varias cosas que llaman la atención.
Te pedimos por favor consultar el cómo hacer las cosas con la comunidad, hay mucha información y gente que te puede ayudar.
1) Agregaste y sacaste una buena cantidad de tags para el barrio, varios de los cuales están incorrectos, pero denotan que lo que hiciste ayer fue hacer pruebas.
2) Los límites que usaste no son los que aparecen en wikipedia, que es la referencia con la que quedó el barrio finalmente. ¿Qué fuente usaste?
3) dejaste los límites pegados a varios elementos. Esto va a ser muy difícil de arreglar.

Voy a consultar con otros maperos por estas ediciones, para ver si vale la pena conservarlos. Lo mismo pasa con ediciones de años anteriores.
VOy a pedir a maperos locales que revisen lo hecho en la V región.

Por lo pronto, te invitamos a formar parte del chat de maperos de Chile en Telegram en el link https://t.me/OSMcl. Ahí se conversan este tipo de cosas y se aclaran dudas a quienes comienzan.

Saludos
❤️‍🔥 (2025-08-03 09:28:39+00:00): Hi, could you please help me understand why you deleted some of these signs? They still exist, I saw them last week while surveying the switch refs. 

I'm also don't think we have permission to use the resources that you linked to....
WillieWoo257986 (2025-08-03 10:40:41+00:00): Hey, 

I deleted certain signs for two main reasons. Many were incorrectly labelled as SI_xxxx, which only apply to specific ones which are designated as a form of signal. (Virtual PPI by staff). 

Secondly the ones I deleted are numbered xxxx under a separate scheme and designate the ends of track sections. They apply to whole sections of track between multiple SDD's. Those signs aren't signals, but exist in the opposite direction of them for maintenance reasons. If you look on the ground you'll notice more yellow signs with arrows that exist at all locations where a section boundry is.

TLDR, The coloured lights you see and some yellow signs are signals for a specific points (which I kept/updated numbering for) designated SI_xxxx. The rest xxxx are just section numbers for a length of track, not a single point, nor a signal. It would be more accurate to label the whole track section under that xxxx(T) label.

The resources are public. Published by the line operator. You can find it in very large writing at the top of their website. I'm not sure why we couldn't use them.

ANYWAY thanks for reading please let me know if you have any other questions/tell me I did something wrong.


Thanks!
❤️‍🔥 (2025-08-03 20:39:05+00:00): > "Many were incorrectly labelled as SI_xxxx" 

Well, that's what the signs say. So they shouldn't be deleted since they do exist and do have this exact wording printed on them.

railway:signal:*:form=sign indicates that this is a static sign rather than a light. 

If some yellow signs have a different purpose, you can indicate that with railway:signal:*:function - see https://osm.wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging


> "The resources are public. [...] I'm not sure why we couldn't use them."

Unlike wikipedia, we can't just use copyrighted information, we need explicit permission. See http://osm.wiki/Copyright and https://osm.wiki/Contributors#Australia for a list of australian sources. If you want to use this information, you would need to email the company to get explicit consent
WillieWoo257986 (2025-08-03 21:24:15+00:00): Hey,

I did end up sending you a message on discord but if you didn't see it don't worry.

The source error was my bad, I assumed that I needed something proper to back up my own info (hence I only edited locations I have been able to personally confirm).

As to the signs themselves, I feel like theres some misunderstanding or miscommunication (or maybe a design safety failure but I doubt that). I would suggest just confirming you're talking about "SI_xxxx" marked signs on the approach to platforms. A good example is a sign reading "4104" which you marked as "SI_4104" at KVE. 

Considering they aren't classed as a signal and don't meet the definition of signal as per the tagging page, I struggle to understand the point of them, or what there function should be classed as?

Thanks
❤️‍🔥 (2025-08-03 23:43:28+00:00): ah sorry, thought i fixed my discord notifications but evidently not 😆 let's discuss it over there
NatalieVvln (2026-02-01 16:29:49+00:00): 13044816542 этого объекта нет на местности, все мозаики находятся на гаражном кооперативе с другой стороны дороги
solenoid jam (2026-02-01 19:41:15+00:00): Исправил.Слава локалам!
user_5359 (2025-08-03 06:57:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The entire road is supposed to be a water crossing, or is it just one spot that is a river crossing ? One-off storm situations should not be entered.
DerSeegurke (2025-08-03 08:23:05+00:00): Hi there!
This street does exist. It is rather new and does not yet show up on Bing or Esri imagery, but on "Saarland DOP20", which is available in iD and JOSM.
The northern node being unconnected to "Von-Boch-Straße" was indeed wrong and should be fixed.
So, I suggest to revert this changeset.
Best regards
BCNorwich (2025-08-03 09:23:05+00:00): Hi, Thanks for the info, reverted and joined at the north end.

Regards Bernard.
HantDX (2025-08-04 20:28:26+00:00): Откуда взяли инфу по рекам? Откуда название Дрочиловка? И почему в name записано на русск. яз., а не на бел. яз.?
Антон-1983 (2025-08-18 11:03:38+00:00): По документам конца 19 века здесь имеено река Дрочиловка. К тому же и на всех современных картах также. Река Промша начинается от слияния рек Дрочиловка и Семковка.

К сожалению с белорусским языком плохо
Антон-1983 (2025-08-18 11:06:04+00:00): Ещё не разобрался с рекой Пуцовица - кто то обозначил её вместо р.Семковка. Я оставил её как приток Семковки. Но вроде она должна быть притоком р.Негримовка
HantDX (2025-08-18 11:59:52+00:00): Ок, с р. Дрочиловка понятно, я тоже нашёл отрывочные сведения о ней в инэте. Странно, что никакой официальной инфы по ней нет...
HantDX (2025-08-18 12:00:42+00:00): по р. Пуцовица тоже вроде оч мало инфы...
HantDX (2025-08-18 12:04:51+00:00): А по поводу бел. мовы в name по правилам надо писать именно на ней названия. Тут на карте ещё вроде работает какой-то автоматический переводчик с русского на бел., но он не касается топонимов, их нельзя автоматически переводить, нужно всегда знать написание оригинала на бел. мове.
infeeeee (2025-08-03 09:56:02+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Azért nem járható mert olyan az út minősége, vagy azért mert ki van táblázva? Illetve más járművel sem járható?

Amit most címkéztél, az azt jelenti, hogy csak gyalogosan szabad bemenni.

Ha az út minősége miatt nem járható bicóval, arra más jobb címkéink vannak: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség#Elérhetőségek

További jó térképezést!
Herr Bause (2025-08-04 16:32:16+00:00): Hallo,
die Bäckerei ist schon eingetragen, ich lösche deshalb deinen Node
StC (2025-08-06 12:15:46+00:00): Hello,

once again this changeset has broken the route relation. Could you please reply one of my comments, so that we can discuss how to properly manage this very fragile route?
AlesKubr (2025-08-24 17:41:10+00:00): Hi St.,

Sorry I messed up the relation, and sorry for the late reply. I fetched the route and several others in hiking.waymarkedtrails.org and I can see the continuity and member order mess I created. iD really is not great for complex route relations, lesson learned. I would really appreciate your advice on how to manage this very fragile route. Thanks again, and sorry for the trouble.

Ales
StC (2025-08-24 19:08:06+00:00): Hi,

by a (fairly long) process of trials and errors we have collectively determined that the only way to manage routes with "leaves and stems" (that is, which double back on themselves) is to rely on relation ordering and to have every way present as many times as necessary in the relation. This defeats automated ordering algorithms, including the (fairly recent) one from iD. Currently when I need to modify the corresponding parts of Chemin des Douaniers, particularly this one, I switch to JOSM, use its relation editor, ignore its warnings about multiple members, and rely on its vertical black line (and red dots for interruptions) at the right of the list of members.

We have two main ways of monitoring the continuity of routes: Knooppuntnet Monitor and, more recently, the route inspector in Waymarkedtrails.

Cheers,

St.
AlesKubr (2025-08-30 06:33:54+00:00): Hi St.,

Thanks for the explanation, that clears things up a lot. I’ll use JOSM for this route and keep an eye on continuity with the Waymarkedtrails inspector so I don’t mess it up again. Appreciate your patience!

Ales
NeisReview (2025-08-03 07:24:55+00:00): #NameChanges

Hi, welcome to OSM.

In the past 12 hours, you have made numerous name changes across various changesets. This included modifying names as well as removing other name:*. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.

You can find an overview of the recent changesets at the following link: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=20114851
Spush (2025-08-03 10:51:54+00:00): Hali!
Szerkesztéseddel az egész utcát kapunak jelölted. Az utcát visszaállítottam. Mindig ellenőrizd, hogy mit szerkesztettél mielőtt a feltöltés gombra nyomsz. Köszi!
További j ó szerkesztést kívánok!
Castfore (2025-08-04 04:04:28+00:00): Szia, köszönöm, bocs. A Malom utca és a Széchenyi utca kereszteződésétől a Malom utca nem járható mert kerítéssel le van zárva, magánterület az út is ( nem tudom hogyan lehet ), egy pulykatartó telep. Azt szerettem volna mert a tervező simán átvisz rajta és vissza kellett fordulnom.
infeeeee (2025-08-04 11:07:41+00:00): Javítottam ezt itt tegnap: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169899350
eggie (2025-08-03 10:52:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-08-03 10:56:29+00:00): Maurice.. Waarom zou er ook een fietspad via die trap lopen. Moet dat niet een highway=footway zijn?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-08-03 11:06:09+00:00): Ik heb dat noordelijke fietspad omgezet in een highway=path en de parkeerplaats aangepast ander kunnen auto's er niet meer uit.
CTRL F5 voor het effect.
Maurice_NL (2025-08-03 17:29:59+00:00): Dit pad bestond al, ik heb enkel de naam toegevoegd.
eggie (2025-08-03 17:34:52+00:00): Oke...   Dat heb ik gezien en is oke, maar de situatie met twee fietspaden riep vragen op en wellicht weet jij het antwoord. 

MVG
eggie
Maurice_NL (2025-08-03 17:44:07+00:00): Ik ken deze regio wel, maar de sectie met de trap en het tweede fietspad eigenlijk niet. Als ik er kom zal er naar kijken.
eggie (2025-08-03 17:47:58+00:00): Oke... top... Ik heb het voor nu aangepast, want ik kan me niet voorstellen dat er een bord fietspad staat.

Mapse,
eggie
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-27 02:30:03+00:00): Cleaned up many SEO spam and incorrect tags from hotel in changeset 183234854

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183234854
NeisReview (2025-08-03 08:09:36+00:00): #NameTag

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I’ve taken a look at your recent edits, especially those involving name tags. Some of the names you’ve added caught my attention, as they seem a bit unusual. As noted in the OSM Wiki, the name tag should contain only the actual name of the feature—not descriptions, types, locations, family names, addresses, or other attributes.

Could you please confirm whether these entries were intentional or possibly added by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

---
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:name
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-11 16:48:20+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4906469708/history has shop = vêtement that was added in this edit
shop=vêtement ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
texent (2025-08-03 08:15:18+00:00): 池の形も修正した
ralley (2025-08-05 00:41:27+00:00): The correct way to tag a destroyed building is to use a life cycle prefix (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_decay) instead of tagging as an area.  Also please don't change the name to a description: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169892054
MaliMrav (2025-08-13 08:40:48+00:00): Zdravo Blyatman,

Deluje mi da je ova promena "name" taga nepotrebna. U "name" tagu treba da stoji uobičajeni naziv koji koriste lokalci, što sam siguran da je samo "NIS petrol".

Zvaničan naziv (npr. "NIS petrol Sevojno 1") treba da stoji u "official_name" tagu, što je manje-više već slučaj i za ovu benzinsku stanicu i za stanicu koja se nalazi preko puta.

Ukoliko nemaš ništa protiv, revertovao bih ovu promenu.

Pozdrav,
MaliMrav
aidak18 (2025-08-03 08:46:54+00:00): تامین خودرو بهترین مرکز کارشناسی و دیتیلینگ ماشین
grzegorz75jan (2025-08-03 09:50:06+00:00): Piszesz "zmiana polnej drogi na mieszkaniową" a jest odwrotnie ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169892964
grzegorz75jan (2025-08-03 09:56:16+00:00): Wycofane. Jeżeli już zmieniałeś drogę to geometria drogi prosiła się o poprawę szczególnie na skrzyżowaniu.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169892964
Zybi6 (2025-08-03 09:02:30+00:00): proszę  usunąć tą zmianę, bo namieszałem, przepraszam
grzegorz75jan (2025-08-03 09:44:34+00:00): Wycofane.  Fakt faktem namieszane, mało precyzyjne. Nie łącz dróg i innych obiektów z granicami - klawisz Ctrl albo Alt (nie pamiętam) twoim przyjacielem. Dobrze, że napisałeś komentarz ale na przyszłość lepiej zgłaszaj na forum lub Discord bo taki komentarz może umknąć.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169895480
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-09 09:20:23+00:00): Hello!

You used
craft=jewellery
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13021933616/history

Have you maybe meant
craft=jeweller
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
mueschel (2025-12-09 09:46:11+00:00): Definitely a mistake - fixed.
NeisReview (2025-08-03 09:41:56+00:00): #NameTag

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I’ve taken a look at your recent edits, especially those involving name tags. Some of the names you’ve added caught my attention, as they seem a bit unusual. As noted in the OSM Wiki, the name tag should contain only the actual name of the feature—not descriptions, types, locations, family names, addresses, or other attributes.

Could you please confirm whether these entries were intentional or possibly added by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

---
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:name
tordans (2025-08-22 04:57:40+00:00): @mueschel laut https://tldr.nettime.org/@leitmedium/115068427255737564 hängen jetzt die Schilder. Wir könnten also die Namen jetzt umdrehen.
Peter Newman (2026-05-07 13:50:49+00:00): Did you intend to change it to Tea<m> Rooms given the webpage is Tea Rooms?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-27 10:11:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180494113 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some poor quality and some fantasy mapping in Ukraine
maro21 (2025-08-03 11:15:16+00:00): Cześć, dawne niemieckie nazwy wpisujemy w tagu [old_name:de].
eggie (2025-08-03 11:14:23+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,
Alleen een naam zal niets doen in OM.
Ik heb voorlopig office=company toegevoegd en de verwijzing naar de BAG teruggezet. 

MVG
eggie
Communication Partners BV (2025-08-03 12:41:23+00:00): Goedemiddag Eggie,

Bedankt voor het aanpassen.
Ik heb nog een vraag:
Wanneer wordt de bedrijfsnaam zichtbaar op het adres?
Groet,
Robert
eggie (2025-08-03 12:47:07+00:00): Dag Robert.

Die pois zijn  hardnekkig met de oude rendering. Vaak help CTRL-F5 een paar keer toetsen. Je Cache leegmaken.

MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse (2025-08-03 09:51:38+00:00): Includes one bike route guidepost in York
eggie (2025-08-03 11:17:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback   Je verwijderde hier wegen van de kaart. waarom?
Je geeft in je commentaar bij upload niet aan wat je doet. 

Het is niet de bedoeling om bestaande wegen van de kaart te verwijderen. 

Wel kun je wegen van accesstags voor zien. Bv access=private. Het zal dan niet routeren.

Ik zal de wegen weer terugzetten.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-08-03 11:21:30+00:00): Reverted by Wijzigingenset #169899488

Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-08-03 11:20:25+00:00): Reverted by changeset #169894788
eggie (2025-08-03 11:19:37+00:00): reverted by changeset #169899419
eggie (2025-08-03 11:22:46+00:00): access=private toegevoegd
eggie (2025-08-03 12:10:41+00:00): Dag Huib  Hier zitten door schuiven met de halte de wegen in de knoop.
De weg schuift dan toch mee?
Ik zal het weer aanpassen.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=169895056
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-08-03 12:15:10+00:00): Ik heb ij ieder geval de knoop ontward.
Verder kun je routerelaties alleen bewerken met editor JOSM

MVG
eggie
NeisReview (2025-08-03 09:45:10+00:00): #NameChanges

Hi, welcome to OSM.

In the past hours, you have made numerous name changes across various changesets. This included modifying names as well as removing other name:*. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.

You can find an overview of the recent changesets at the following link: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid= 23154337
eggie (2025-08-03 12:08:23+00:00): Dag huib  De bushalte en stop heb ik losgemaakt van de landuse grass en residential.
MVG
eggie
Leo Slager (2025-08-03 21:00:47+00:00): De routerelaties van bus 258 zijn aangepast.
eggie (2025-08-03 21:06:34+00:00): Thx
gr eggie
eggie (2025-08-03 11:56:44+00:00): Dag Teun.. access=yes is default op wegen. dat hoef je niet de taggem.. net als foot=yes. 
Ik zal die tags verwijderen. Het routeert gewoon. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-08-03 11:59:00+00:00): access privae heb ik van het bruggetje en de korte verbinding met de hoofdrijbaan verwijderd. He zal anders nog  niet werken.
mvg
eggie
Casey_boy (2025-08-22 12:47:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168713995/

dog=leased? Only dogs that have been hired can walk here? ;-)
SomeoneElse (2025-08-22 13:21:36+00:00): Thanks!
Jordi MF (2025-08-03 13:18:27+00:00): Hola Andreu, gràcies per millorar la base de dades d'OSM.

Tanmateix, en este conjunt de canvis has modificat el nom de manera incorrecta. L'etiqueta de nom ha de dur el nom oficial. En el cas dels centres educatius, fa anys que la comunitat d'OSM va acordar que havia de contindre el nom oficial complet sense abreviatures. Si el centre educatiu té un nom "popular", existeix una etiqueta que el representa: "loc_name=*". Així, es mantenen tots els noms i qualsevol persona podrà buscar-los.

Salutacions.
Andreu Andreu i Andreu (2025-08-04 07:45:52+00:00): Gràcies Jordi! No ho savia, revertit al nom original (tot i que llarg) i abreviat la nomenglatura alternativa.
Jordi MF (2025-08-04 09:36:19+00:00): Em va resultar molt curiós que a esta secció de l'IES Clot de Moro se la conega amb el sobrenom de 'Jaume'...

Siga com siga, gràcies a tu!
Bobbi123 (2025-08-05 11:57:30+00:00): Auf dem Plan der Westumgehung, auf den du dich bei der anderen Änderung mit der Freileitung als Quelle beziehst, ist aber der Name Ebersbacher Straße rauf bis zur St2243 drin. 

Und dass Straßennamen generell an den Ortsschildern enden ist nicht korrekt. Ob hier also die Straßennamen auch außerörtlich gelten, kann jede Kommune festlegen, so dass sie bis zur Gemeindegrenze gehen kann. 

Welche Regelung hier in Hetzles bzw. Neunkirchen besteht, müsste man also korrekt erfragen, bevor man den Straßennamen außerorts einfach löscht. Ich würde dich also bitten, deine Änderung deshalb erstmal wieder zu revidieren, bis klar ist, ob hier der Straßenname tatsächlich über das Ortsschild hinaus geht oder nicht. Dafür braucht es übrigens außerorts nicht mal ein offizielles Straßenschild.
Bobbi123 (2025-08-05 12:03:12+00:00): Ein gutes Beispiel dafür ist z.B. der Wehrwiesenweg zwischen dem Kreisverkehr bei Unterschöllenbach und der St2243. Diese Straße trägt ganz offiziell den Namen "Wehrwiesenweg", obwohl sie gänzlich außerhalb von geschlossenen Ortsschaften verläuft.
Daham (2025-08-08 09:57:52+00:00): OTG, geliebter Stalker. Zwischen dem Ortseingangschild und dem "Vorfahrt gewähren" am Kirschgarten ist kein Straßenname angeschlagen. Der Stringenz halber werde ich das Stück auch noch korrigieren. Die einige Straßenbennenung findet sich zwischen Schule und Kirschgarten.
Bobbi123 (2025-08-08 11:14:09+00:00): Für den "Stalker" wurdest du eben gemeldet. Eine derartige Ausfälligkeit nur wegen einer einfachen, sachlichen Nachfrage, geht definitiv zu weit. 

Schade, dass du hier derart aggierst, wo ich doch angenommen habe, dass im Zuge unserer letzten abgestimmten Änderung bei den Querungen in Ebersbach zwischen uns alles wieder bereinigt ist. Von meiner Seite war es das jedenfalls.
Daham (2025-08-08 12:09:15+00:00): Du verträgst ja auch gar nichts... Wer austeilt, muß auch einstecken können. 
(revidieren, melden usw)
Und ja, über Deinen changset bzgl der Querungen innerorts vor ein paar Tagen habe ich mich tatsächlich sehr gefreut. Für einen changeset ist die Diskussion in Gänze OT. Wie wär's mit einer PN gewesen? Wg OT beende ich das hier auch. Wiedersehn.
custodiankeyy (2025-08-03 20:13:06+00:00): Lütfen büyük değişiklik seti yapmaktan kaçınalım.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets