piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Aya Samir (2026-04-29 10:55:30+00:00): Hello Mourad Y,
Thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap.
Regarding changes 181937811 & 181934386, you changed these locations; however, the imagery used in the update appears outdated.
The most recent imagery I have available is dated 26-04-2026, suggesting that the previous changes were consistent with the current situation on the ground. Could you please revert your changes?
You can also use this website to find out the date of the image in Esri:https://livingatlas.arcgis.com/wayback/#mapCenter=10.21624%2C36.74318%2C16&mode=explore&active=22869
And also, you can check any updates on this site: https://browser.dataspace.copernicus.eu/?zoom=16&lat=36.74317&lng=10.21411&themeId=DEFAULT-THEME&visualizationUrl=U2FsdGVkX19mOp1Ga6kBopKs%2Bs2hZuAYW4iY6uv7PwgKl1kS%2BCRdsGyaXaz7elcEAIs7wfutWPXLAEq66DC47GJalA9mGYT20qV1wtRg7wdHJefVnTPNAq0JOk2MEaRS&datasetId=S2_L2A_CDAS&fromTime=2026-04-26T00%3A00%3A00.000Z&toTime=2026-04-26T23%3A59%3A59.999Z&layerId=1_TRUE_COLOR&demSource3D=%22MAPZEN%22&cloudCoverage=30&dateMode=SINGLE
Thank you for your time and effort.
Regards,
Aya
eggie (2026-04-28 15:10:27+00:00): Maar nu is die weer verkeerd.
from via to. no_u_turn
Ik had het als voorbeeld toegevoegd. 
Ik heb 'via' weer toegevoegd.. anders foutmelding.
Je hebt meestal drie elementen. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-28 15:12:21+00:00): Aan de andere zijde ook toegevoegd. Kijk evt hoe dat in elkaar zit.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-28 12:30:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
SBatBiw (2026-04-28 12:37:08+00:00): Bedankt!
Strubbl (2026-04-28 15:12:30+00:00): Ich habe hier den Text vom note-Tag mal zu description verschoben. Der note-Tag ist eher für Texte an andere Mapper gedacht und wird von den Apps nicht ausgewertet.
Iain Banks SCC (2026-04-28 13:08:00+00:00): Yee this is city centre ring route that was created many year sago - we are now looking to complete the cycling network  over the coming year sand beginning to map dedicated routes - this route is highlighted here file:///C:/Users/Iain%20Banks/Downloads/SouthendTravelMapTownCentre.pdf
Iain Banks SCC (2026-04-28 13:11:16+00:00): I have now downloaded and set up JOSM - wow! that may take a bit of learning, and the default presets for Transport>Bicycle does not include route like in Public Transport.  Something for another day :(
Iain Banks SCC (2026-04-28 13:11:59+00:00): Link incorrect above:  https://forwardmotionsouthessex.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/SouthendTravelMapTownCentre.pdf
evgenykatyshev (2026-04-28 13:10:28+00:00): Is it a camp site called "Football field" or it is actually a football field?
NorthCrab_upload (2026-04-29 03:15:18+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13770526274

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Vinber-Pro (2026-04-28 15:26:28+00:00): Bonjour,
il semble y avoir eu des ajouts dans beaucoup d'endroit du monde, cela génère un groupe de modification un peu grand. Il estpréféable, souhaitable, de faire par aire géographique, une pour Rouen et une pour l'île mayreau (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1505060450).

bonne carto
Vinber-Pro (2026-04-28 15:27:04+00:00): > dans beaucoup d'endroit du monde
non erreur de ma part, c'est dans 2 endroits éloignés
MartialTiti (2026-04-29 15:43:02+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci de me l'avoir fait remarquer. Je le saurais à présent.
Vinber-Pro (2026-05-04 12:34:50+00:00): bonjour,
je ne connais pas grand monde à qui cela n'est jamais arrivé :)

bonne carto
giopera (2026-05-04 19:23:20+00:00): Ciao, ci sono pervenute le tue modifiche e vorremmo capire il come mai di tutte queste cancellazioni, essendo la rotaia ancora ben visibile è meglio mantenere il tag disused con tutti gli elementi, invece vedo che tu ne hai rimossi molti, se la rotaia non è più presente ma è solo verificabile da survey il tag razed sarebbe più indicato a questo scopo.
蕉饼电脑 (2026-04-29 07:34:23+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Please do not add the same element twice, and please use the local written system (Simplified Chinese characters) for the name.
Onur Çetin (2026-04-28 12:59:04+00:00): *street side parking areas not parking lots
rskedgell (2026-04-28 13:54:14+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding the bridge outline.

The height limit is actually tagged on the road segment passing underneath the bridge, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374546490
BCNorwich (2026-04-28 14:44:13+00:00): Hi, actually the bridge structure is already mapped with Way: 542949337. There are now 2 beam bridge structures mapped. The first one Way: 542949337 looks a better. It might be better to place the new tags on this outline.

Regards Bernard.
AgusQui (2026-04-29 03:26:31+00:00): No es correcto agregar landuse=residential a las relaciones de límites de localidades, ya que estas indicando usos residenciales en zonas que no lo son
Necessarycoot72 (2026-04-28 14:00:17+00:00): Hi, I see you're new to OSM, so welcome. i let you know that this roundabout is improperly mapped. 

You should check out the wiki before adding features if you're new to mapping.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction=roundabout
eggie (2026-04-28 15:05:58+00:00): Hoi,

Je vraagt feedback. Probeer concreet aan te geven wat je hebt gedaan svp.
Kleine aanpassingen zeggen niemand iets.
Lijkt me verder wel oke. 

MVG
eggie
iandees (2026-04-28 14:49:49+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/151750885 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181945135, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
ghaarsma (2026-04-28 15:13:11+00:00): Sorry about that. Thank you for the catch.
Yog Sot (2026-04-29 00:22:54+00:00): a skąd źródło dodanej wysokości?
rednotf (2026-04-29 06:37:13+00:00): z aktywności na zegarku marki Garmin :)
Yog Sot (2026-04-29 13:17:31+00:00): a ile metrów nad ziemią był twój zegarek? Dlaczego tego źródła nie masz np w swoich https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rednotf/traces ?

Ostatecznie pomiary wysokości dla oficjalnie nazwanych wzniesień wykonuje się specjalistycznymi narzędziami
Tomas09 (2026-04-28 23:50:50+00:00): Update what? Most of your changeset comments are really empty. They're supposed to convey what you've changed.
BholeKiBhasam (2026-04-29 03:23:39+00:00): g'day mate, well i  keep that in during next edits, though in this region I have almost added the changes made...might have the closing form got the update text while saving....let me correct that and thanks for the feedback, appreciate that...have a great weekend ahed
BholeKiBhasam (2026-04-29 03:25:54+00:00): well I see now, these were swimming pools some street lamps and building corrections which were mapped under single building, while there were / are separate units...
eggie (2026-04-28 15:03:47+00:00): Dag au merci,

Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnodes. Spaties uit postcode verwijderd. 
Probeer als het kan op de bestaande adresnodes bij te taggen.

MVG
eggie
au-merci (2026-06-04 22:32:46+00:00): Dank! Genoteeerd.
iandees (2026-04-28 14:50:29+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2780302847 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181945167, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Kovoschiz (2026-04-28 23:56:24+00:00): HI, sorry for the `ref-HK` typo. But the problem is they have a Chinese code which would be eg `ref:zh-HK:KMB`
Kovoschiz (2026-04-28 23:59:45+00:00): I did think about `ref:*-HK:KMB` vs `ref:*:HK:KMB=` , decided to fold into the former to match localization, and avoid over-namespacing (although hyphen for the locale string is borderline)
lostmike (2026-05-03 10:12:59+00:00): Why have you changed 'A' roads into tertiary roads here?
In the UK 'A' roads are classed as trunk roads whereas 'C' roads are generally classed as tertiary.
Hamilton Terrace is classed as the A4076.
North14 (2026-05-03 12:26:01+00:00): Hi lostmike, thanks for pointing that out to me. My mistake. I was changing it as this road category is used for „speed lanes“ in e.g. Germany, Austria and Switzerland. A road that allows high Speed either inner city or outside. Again thanks for your feedback.
lostmike (2026-05-03 13:21:00+00:00): Ok. I changed it back so no need to revisit.
iandees (2026-04-28 14:50:44+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2764492658, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8649734331 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181945181, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
joost schouppe (2026-04-30 09:10:24+00:00): You added a Tagesklinik as a hospital, but by definition, see the introduction at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhospital
I'll adjust the point
silversurfer83 (2026-04-28 18:21:25+00:00): Hi :)

du hast hier den ganzen Werkgraben mit layer=-1 versehen. Ich vermute, dass dir der Editor eine Warnung ausgegeben hat und du diese vielleicht abgenickt hast.

Bei diesen Warnungen ist es immer wichtig sich genau anzusehen, was der Editor vorschlägt und wenn du dir nicht sicher bist, es zu verstehen, schlage ich idR vor die Warnung zu ignorieren.

Im Westen macht ein schlecht geführter Zufluss Ärger und weiter östlich ein Gebäude. Interessant wäre zu wissen, wie genau das Wasser das Gebäude passiert. Dann können wir sagen, wie dort gehandelt werden sollte. (Das Gebäude auf layer=1 zu setzen halte ich für die wahrscheinliche Variante)

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181943187
Warburg_Mobilität (2026-04-29 09:57:02+00:00): Hallo, genau so ist es: der Editor hat mich auf Gebäude & Graben hingewiesen und ich habe den unterbreiteten Vorschlag angenommen. Das Gebäude ist das Wasserkraftwerk der Stadtwerke Warburg, durch das das Wasser hindurchfließt. Ich würde mich freuen, wenn du vielleicht die richtige Formatierung dafür wählen könntest ;-)
silversurfer83 (2026-05-03 12:19:56+00:00): Hi

habe den Werkgraben mal ein wenig angepasst

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182156884
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-22 20:50:10+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Cleaned up SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186200336
eggie (2026-04-28 14:59:49+00:00): Hi , I restored the building.

Greetz,
eggie
silversurfer83 (2026-04-28 18:13:57+00:00): HI :)

steht am anderen Ende der Straße bei Altenhasungen auch ein Poller? Und: Gibt es auch Verkehrszeichen? Wenn ja, welche?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181944044
JP100099 (2026-04-28 18:48:19+00:00): Moin, richtung Altenhasungen sind keine Poller (damit die landwirte weiter nen zugang haben)
schilder stehen auf beiden Seiten jeweils
VZ 357-50 (also sackgasse mit ausnahme für farrad und fußgänger) mit zusatzschild 1008-34 (keine Wendemöglichkeit).
Die zeichne ich noch ein
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181944044
Lirum Larum (2026-04-29 09:00:45+00:00): Hallo Nausika,
Was ist die Idee davon, Sitzbänken eine Adresse zu geben, die augenscheinlich gar nicht existiert?
Nausika (2026-04-29 10:40:01+00:00): Hoi Lirum Larum
Danke für den Hinweis, das war nicht beabsichtigt. Da habe ich offenbar eine Fehlbedienung gemacht (manuell eingetragen habe ich das nicht).
Lirum Larum (2026-04-29 11:14:07+00:00): Ok, dann danke fürs Korrigieren, und weiterhin viel Spass beim mappen.
ScarlettB (2026-04-29 09:27:03+00:00): The new facade is mostly guessed, but I have asked its makers whether it would be possible to release any kind of plan to the building, to make it more accurate. If that fails, I'll try to make do with a rangefinder to improve it.
OSM_RogerWilco (2026-04-29 04:57:44+00:00): Moin!
bei diesem Abschnitt sehe ich nicht sidewalk=both. Der Weg auf der nordwestlichen Seite befindet sich hinter dem Zaun auf dem Gelände der Stadt (Lagerfläche). Der Weg wurde erst kürzlich angelegt, als die Fläche als Parkplatz für eine Veranstalltung hier im Dorf genutzt wurde. Als benutzungspflichtigen Gehweg von der Straße sehe ich diesen Abschnitt nicht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1505095800
Viele Grüße
Langlaeufer (2026-04-29 06:11:35+00:00): 👍
iandees (2026-04-28 14:50:58+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8401414496 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181945195, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
rajdhani (2026-04-29 11:09:58+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181982615
CoryS89 (2026-04-30 14:01:46+00:00): Those were all service roads. I changed them back, you had incorrectly made them residential roads. Please be more accurate with your edits. Please read the documentation if things aren't clear enough. Please ask for help from other users if you need help. Fixing your errors is not how I want to spend my day. Thanks.
AndyB_66 (2026-04-28 15:55:47+00:00): Przepraszam, ale musiałem nadpisać tę zmianę, bo w międzyczasie edytowałem geometrię całego węzła i łącznika na podstawie PB. Popraw, proszę, kategorie dróg jeszcze raz, jeżeli uważasz, że ten fragment ma być "motorway_link", a nie "secondary".
OSMaper_xD (2026-04-28 16:09:35+00:00): w tej sytuacje secondary powinno zostać raczej
AndyB_66 (2026-04-28 16:14:05+00:00): @OSMaper_xD: Też tak uważam, bo zapewne DK39 zmieni przebieg i pójdzie łącznikiem do węzła.
Dawid2849 (2026-04-28 16:36:33+00:00): @AndyB_66 Nic się nie stało :)
Po Twojej zmianie kształtu węzła, moja zmiana już raczej nie ma sensu, więc raczej nie będę jej przywracać.
OSMaper_xD (2026-04-28 16:48:36+00:00): sorry za offtop, ale czy też uważacie że to rondo nie ma sensu?
A67-A67 (2026-07-24 13:09:03+00:00): In deze wijziging worden sloten en landuses aan elkaar geplakt. Dat is niet de bedoeling. Ik heb het hersteld.
Dawid2849 (2026-04-28 14:57:48+00:00): Oczywiście chodziło o Oświęcim <-> Bieruń 😅
Kovoschiz (2026-04-29 20:08:24+00:00): Why are you removing `embankment=` ?
vectorial8192 (2026-04-30 12:40:12+00:00): Basically, when we have explicit / separate lines to describe the direction of embankment, I think we no longer need to keep the embankment tags on the roads.

Also, it's ambiguous when the outer roads *and* the inner roads both have embankment information; the relative "layering" of the embankment is unclear. Here I just let the outer area declare that they are on embankment and just presume the inner area is on some large embanked flatland, so no need to mention "embankment=yes".
kingkingHK (2026-04-30 13:43:20+00:00): > I think we no longer need to keep the embankment tags on the roads

That's just not true. `embankment=yes` exists to specifies that the section of road is on an embankment. You can't expect data consumers to look up all instances of `man_made=embankment` and guess which `highway=` is on it. You wouldn't remove `bridge=yes` or `tunnel=yes` after drawing `man_made=bridge` or `man_made=tunnel`, would you?

Re second paragraph, "on some large embanked flatland" should logically imply `embankment=yes`; I don't see why "no need to mention".
vectorial8192 (2026-05-01 11:44:28+00:00): I am heavily biased towards software solutions.

I can see there can be a case for providing intrinsic attributes (e.g. bridge=yes ) and physical attributes ( manmade=bridge ; OSM roads very often do not specify their actual width), both do not conflict with each other.

That said, look at the "5 main structures" suggested by iD: bridge, tunnel, embankment, cutting, ford. The upcoming theme is "multi-layer structures".

By definition, fords cannot be multi-layer. By practice, cuttings cannot be multi-layer, because nay deeper layer would become e.g. tunnel=yes .

We have well-known standards to describe multi-layer bridges and tunnels (using layer=* ), but so far I am not aware of any standards for describing "multi-layer embankment".

When the embankment is large enough, the features contained in the embankment need not declare that it's on an embankment. There is also this undecidability issue where the usage of embankment tag implies a certain obvious ground level, which in this case is not clear whether we are referring to the riverside ground level or the very-wide embanked ground level.
Kovoschiz (2026-05-02 08:54:09+00:00): "When the embankment is large enough, the features contained in the embankment need not declare that it's on an embankment." Why?
Kovoschiz (2026-05-02 08:57:37+00:00): Why is `embankment=` not "intrinsic"?
"Software solution" is more impossible with lines. `man_made=bridge` area has an easy spatial relationship. You would have to find the other side of a `man_made=embankment` at an arbitrary distance (expensive), and generate an area between them in pre-processing or on-the-fly. This doesn't work with one-sided ones either.
vectorial8192 (2026-05-02 14:10:52+00:00): I feel like we are discussing the kind of question which is so obvious and trivial, it need not be mentioned in the first place.

Consider e.g. Shatin. We can very easily find photos to show that the riverside ground level is very different from the "general roads" ground level, the entire built area is basically embanked from the riverside. Then, for painfully obvious reasons and by simple intuition, all those roads and buildings need not declare `embankment=yes`.

My sentiment is not personally-directed, but this discussion is getting stupid.
Kovoschiz (2026-05-03 08:54:29+00:00): It doesn't help your argument with "I feel like we are discussing the kind of question which is so obvious and trivial, it need not be mentioned in the first place."
`embankment=` isn't about "embanked from the riverside". It's the surrounding ground.
vectorial8192 (2026-05-04 14:47:14+00:00): There you said it. Only on the edges of the embankment can the individual features notice that they are on some embankment.
Kovoschiz (2026-05-05 07:03:07+00:00): The inability to see a border directly doesn't determine whether you are not on something. If there is a pair of `embankment` along a line, it doesn't mean the latter is `cutting` because the visible surround is higher.
eerib (2026-04-30 01:58:03+00:00): Reverted in full by CS#182013120

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182013120

Reason: User has added several dozen fake trails in a mass vandalism attempt.
Adikso (2026-04-29 18:19:28+00:00): Jak rzeczywiście się ten sklep nazywa? Mam wątpliwości co do nazwy "12kluczyk8123"
OSMaper_xD (2026-04-28 16:16:04+00:00): mój błąd
Vinber-Pro (2026-04-28 15:31:35+00:00): Hello,
I think this is too big for a changeset, it's nicer to make changeset more localy 

regards
iandees (2026-04-28 15:38:18+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/205529060 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181947708, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
matheusgomesms (2026-04-30 17:34:36+00:00): Hider, chequei toda a Avenida João Pessoa, e troquei para uma etiquetagem mais simples, conforme a wiki (primeiro exemplo):

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes:psv

Vê se funciona direitinho agora no teu roteador.

Qualquer coisa só avisar!
Strubbl (2026-04-28 15:31:15+00:00): Falls du die Meldung sichtbarer machen möchtest, wäre ein Hinweis geeigneter: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Notes

Den note-Text von einem Objekt sieht man in den gängigen Apps nicht. Hinweise wie oben verlinkt schon eher.
dzidek23 (2026-05-05 09:53:45+00:00): Hey cokezero1000,

great addition and a very helpful too.

Just two things:
1. if the path is on the surface, don't use "layer=-1"
2. if a path crosses a building, going under a section of it, you should mark it as "tunnel=building_passage"; i.e https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1302234357

Please try to correct your edit.

Cheers!
LordGarySugar (2026-05-26 22:32:17+00:00): Hi, personally I think it would be easier if large residential polygons were split up into smaller sections rather than turning them into multipolygons; I split up the residential areas in Porthcawl in this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183080253 :)
Szymson (2026-04-28 15:50:27+00:00): YouTube z uwagi na prawa autorskie nie jest dopuszczalnym źródłem zmian dla OpenStreetMap
intransan123 (2026-04-28 15:54:35+00:00): A strona kontraktu może być? https://www.s6-skorowo-lesnice.pl/zdjecia-z-pow-2026/
Szymson (2026-04-28 16:06:16+00:00): Już lepiej ;) Mimo wszystko, jako nowemu użytkownikowi OSM radziłbym Tobie nie ingerowanie w sieć dróg krajowych i korzystanie z uwag/pomocy bardziej doświadczonych użytkowników.
eggie (2026-04-28 15:58:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback.. Je hoeft geen adressen toe te voegen aa de gebouwomtrek. Er zijn adresnodes.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
low6in (2026-04-28 16:05:35+00:00): Hoi Eggie, dank voor de info. Eerste bijdrage om uit te proberen. MvG low6in
eggie (2026-04-28 16:09:29+00:00): Oke.. Veel plezier met mappen.
Het adres heb ik wel verwijderd.
eggie
low6in (2026-04-28 16:14:13+00:00): Top!
Yunkers (2026-04-29 07:57:13+00:00): Do ekspresówki brakuje tylko najważniejszego - znaku. Zmiany wycofuję.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-29 13:40:21+00:00): plus nie spełnia wymogów do bycia ekspresówką

skąd ta edycja?
Strubbl (2026-05-23 18:35:56+00:00): Hi Georg, unterstützt deine App auch schon die Panorama-Tags? Ich habe heute Bilder damit hinzugefügt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13284887211
Georg Hennecke (2026-05-26 17:00:11+00:00): Hi Strubbl, nein bisher unterstütze ich die Panorama-Tags noch nicht. Schaue ich mir mal an…Danke für die Info!