piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
doppel-b (2025-12-15 11:28:57+00:00): The cyclepath was already mapped on the road so now it is duplicated. At the western end of the road the protected bike lane ends (this is already mapped as well) and it conitinues as a seperated cycle and foot path.
The protected bike lane is not named "Radlroute 5", it is park of the rr05 which is mapped as a relation. To me it doesn't matter if it is mapped seperately or as part of the road, but please fix the mentioned issues.
Otenkiya (2025-12-20 03:36:40+00:00): ライフサイクル接頭辞を使う場合、これまでの経緯から鉄道の場合は railway=razed などが必須となっております。たとえば、以下のWikiをご確認ください。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:razed:railway
nmaruichi (2025-12-20 13:26:41+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:razed:railway には、確かに必須に書かれています。
色々調べてみると、元の編集には問題があると思います。
まず、この razed:railway キーの  wikiページにもかかれていますが、「対象物の現在の状況に関係がない歴史的なオブジェクトは、一般にOpenStreetMapに入れません。」(日本語でないので( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E3%83%A9%E3%82%A4%E3%83%95%E3%82%B5%E3%82%A4%E3%82%AF%E3%83%AB%E3%81%AE%E6%8E%A5%E9%A0%AD%E8%BE%9E より)と言う原則にそもそも反しています。
また、https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:railway には、値としての razed がかかれておらず、このページの注釈として "1. ↑Some mappers add them to OpenStreetMap with railway=razed, but this is controversial." (1. ↑ 機械翻訳では、一部のマッパーは、OpenStreetMapでそれらを追加していますrailway=razedしかし、これは物議を醸している。) とのことなので、すでに廃止された路線を razed:railway と railway=razed でタグ付けするのは問題があります。
OSM ではなく、OHS (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenHistoricalMap) で確報が良い様です。
MassCartog (2025-12-13 01:39:21+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. Is there a reason you removed the few footpaths and one service road? Looks like they still exist.
MassCartog (2025-12-13 01:46:11+00:00): Looks like you also cut a service road short, so it's no longer connected to the main road, and you added what looks like a gassy field that driving classes happen as a tax office. Were these mistakes?
Erawn (2025-12-13 02:20:55+00:00): The images being used are at least 3 years old.  That DMV road course has been built and in used for a few years.  The road in front of it leading to Partin Settlement was demolished when it was built.  It would not accept this area without a designation, since it is part of the tax collector office (DMV is part of tax collection in Florida) I designated it that.  Partin Settlement Road has been under major construction for a couple of years now as the bridge over the Turnpike is replaced as part of the Turnpike widening project.  The foot paths (sidewalks) along Partin Settlement no longer exist and the foot paths in the lot behind the tax collector office are off limits to non employees, there are restricted access signs everywhere.

I thought the point of openstreet was to have local people update areas that take years, if ever on other maps.  That is exactly what I did.
MassCartog (2025-12-13 16:08:07+00:00): Hey, thanks for the reply! Yes, you are correct, OSM works best when local people update their areas! So thanks for coming and updating this area. 

Thanks for the additional context. OSM is a community project, so without the additional context, it's hard to understand why you removed a feature that appear to exist. 

One thing Ill note since you have a new account and this is not always clear. Features that exist but are off limits, private, or not open to the public, should not be removed from OSM. Instead, we use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public.

I did find a map layer that was more up-to-date in the editor called "Map box satellite" view, so I went ahead and add that driving course road, and set its access tags.

Thanks for the reply and your work on updating this area!
felipeeugenio (2025-12-13 11:25:16+00:00): Hola. Buenos dias. Varios temas con esta edición y otra de ayer.
1) por favor no usar nombres descriptivos. Solo oficiales
2) el tag building es para las estructuras, no para los recintos completos.
3) intersectaste una ciclovía con cruces en la Ruta 5. Lo que definitivamente no existe.

Saludos
SunnyMonster (2025-12-13 01:39:27+00:00): notes about name tagging on highways: originally the name tag of the highways are used for the name of the entire G15 route (沈海高速) and thus tunnel names have to be tagged with tunnel:name. However, it is unclear whether having two names on the same object is a good idea as that means the way represents both the highway route and also the tunnel. Perhaps the name of G15 should be tagged on the relation instead, and then individual segments of tunnel or bridge can be named based on their names.
蕉饼电脑 (2025-12-13 03:35:26+00:00): Leaving "[tunnel name]（[highway name]）" as the name attribute of a linear segment of highway is incorrect. Value of the "name" tag should contain one name. The original tagging is suitable.
aharvey (2025-12-15 12:01:15+00:00): Good one Hugh. I was watching this to see who'd be first to update it, I really thought it was going to be ❤️‍🔥.
minus34 (2025-12-15 19:27:14+00:00): Cheers Andrew, hope you're well?

Felt a certain responsibility since I live < 100m from The Greenway 😊
Warin61 (2025-12-26 01:25:17+00:00): motor_vehicle=permit implies permit is ordinarily granted ... I think you mean motor_vehicle=private?
Warin61 (2025-12-26 01:28:58+00:00): Note I have made the route contiguous.
minus34 (2025-12-26 06:01:10+00:00): Thanks! That's the correct tag as it's restricted to light rail service vehicles only
flohoff (2025-12-13 11:11:14+00:00): Ich hab den changeset hier reverted.

Der loop innerhalb des Parkhauses ist eine Abstraktion die notwendig ist um die Einbahnstraßen an den Ein/Ausfahrten abzubilden OHNE eine routing island zu bauen - D.h. eine Einbahnstraße in die du nur rein aber nie rausfahren kannst.

Das stand als erklärung auch extra auf dem weg drauf.

Flo
stirps (2025-12-13 13:35:20+00:00): Ok danke die Note hatte ich so nicht gesehen, außerdem hatte jedes Parkhaus mit Einbahnstraßen als Ein-/Ausgang, das ich gesehen hatte, jeweils nur eine Parking Entrance/Exit node und keine internen Straßen (siehe auch am SiNN). Aber deswegen das ganze changeset zu reverten...
Falkons (2025-12-13 05:26:48+00:00): Hey, for the maintenance facility on the north side of the airport, I noticed you realigned to the imagery without offset. Before retracing the buildings, I had imagery aligned based on a survey marker to the best I can tell. Generally default offset for map imagery is inaccurate, especially  in Hawaii.
ieguy3 (2025-12-13 03:16:38+00:00): https://rivcodistrict2.org/news/eastvale-civic-center-groundbreaking-marks-new-chapter
azakh-world (2025-12-14 07:11:25+00:00): Hi.
When making platform a multipolygon from a polygon, please, replace the membership of the outer contour with that multipolygon in public transport relations.

https://cdn.organicmaps.app/subway/usa.html#chicago
nickvet419 (2025-12-14 07:42:38+00:00): Ill take a look at that link and see if i can get thise issues corrected
OilStation (2025-12-29 05:58:33+00:00): 节点：https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12196443706
被意外移动了不小的距离，我已修复，将于下个变更集上传。

以后请多加注意。
hsc666 (2025-12-13 07:53:30+00:00): Bitte trage keine privaten Daten in OSM ein! Ich habe die Änderung wieder zurückgesetzt.
user_8655426 (2025-12-13 07:31:54+00:00): Hello,
Thank you for mapping Hamamatsu.
Can we use YouTube as a source for OSM?

Sources of information
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.1
SpinningRuler (2025-12-13 04:36:14+00:00): Here's the full changelog:
1. Updated the Qingxin Park, adjusting the area and adding  paths, restrooms, public square and some sports fields. 
2. Deleted some unnecessary "residential areas" for they were created linking irrelevant nodes, causing editing troubles.
3. Added a bunch of POIs about banks, pharmacies, bakeries, etc.
SpinningRuler (2025-12-13 04:46:39+00:00): 4. Adjusted name tags about some roads, schools and a library.
5. Created areas about a library,  some schools and kindergartens.
Supaplex (2025-12-13 07:33:37+00:00): 如果你要把沒分隔島的路合併，你要處理雙白線無法U-turn的狀況
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175871597
kapazao (2025-12-13 08:18:06+00:00): Hola, se ha llegado a un acuerdo por el que dejamos de usar crossing=marked a crossing=uncontrolled.

Realicé una actualización de los cruces peatonales en España y me he encontrado que has puesto varios como marked, no sé por qué puesto que en principio el editor iD se supone que no lo recomienda ya desde 2022.
Por favor tenlo en cuenta.

Puedes revisar el tema en el foro https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/etiquetado-obsoleto-crossing-zebra/138642

Un saludo
Seraq (2025-12-15 08:28:14+00:00): Muchas gracias Kapazo, así lo haré.

Saludos, 

Seraq
Frans S (2025-12-13 11:40:01+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
I noticed that you most often just draw a rectangle, despite not every building being just rectangular. Please follow the rooflines accurately.
Best regards and keep mapping
joel56dt (2026-01-17 03:21:06+00:00): Please do not add a bridge if you cannot confirm there is a bridge. There is no bridge at this location so I have removed it in CS177322046.
Unikitty (2025-12-23 08:40:57+00:00): Hello, I've noticed that you've been adding an "ID." prefix to the front of the bus stop ids. In the future, could you enter in only the numeric part to ensure it matches the GTFS data? This will help routing software match the OSM data with the GTFS data
HellMap (2025-12-13 11:58:24+00:00): You have again mass-deleted dozens of existing features (ditches, landuse, trees, etc.) mapped by others and replaced with many incorrectly-tagged features instead. I have reverted your edit since you are ignoring requests to stop doing this. You can restore your changes *without* deleting existing elements and tagging everything correctly.
Joseph R P (2025-12-18 00:06:16+00:00): To answer your question regarding classification here—I wouldn't overthink it. It probably makes more sense to tag a short road leading to a few smallish gated communities as unclassified/residential. The NHS designation is here automatically because this small section of roadway is part of St. Rose Pkwy rather than it being a crucial part of the National Highway System. I also don't think it would be a major issue just to leave the tiny segments of road at intersections like this one here as primary (or whatever classification another similar example would have) despite that technically being tagging for the renderer, only because we're talking such small segments rather than a more noticeable and confusing stub.
rempshaener (2025-12-13 10:17:27+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Du hast hier ein layer=-1 gesetzt, vermutlich wegen einer Fehlermeldung? Der layer-Eintrag passt hier nicht so richtig. Das Problem ist, dass der Weg für OSM durch das Gebäude führt, was ohne besonderes Tagging so nicht klappt. Wie sieht das vor Ort denn aus? Ist das eine Gebäudedurchfahrt?
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
Supaplex (2025-12-13 07:34:33+00:00): Is there a local Mandarin name for this place?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175872548
Glassman (2025-12-13 22:44:29+00:00): Is the dog grooming business insdie of the henry bldg? If so , please move the node inside of the building outline.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175872606
DodoGTA (2025-12-13 08:02:53+00:00): O ar nebūtų galima automatizuoti tokius pakeitimus (žinoma padalinant juos per keletą Lietuvos dalių)?
Tomas Straupis (2025-12-13 09:04:07+00:00): Čia gal labiau galima būtų pridėti tikrinimo taisyklę, kad pavadinimas neturi būti ilgesnis už kokius 20-30 simbolių. Aš dabar keliu į githubą visas automatinio tikrinimo taisykles, tai va kai jau viskas veiks, galima bus galvoti ir apie papildomas taisykles. Mintyse daug naujų reikiamų taisyklių yra.
confusedbuffalo (2025-12-14 12:27:45+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for adding this. Just letting you know that I fixed the phone number. We like to include the country code, so +1-253-752-3360 rather than +253-752-3360 which you had (that wouldn't work if you tried to call it directly like that).

Happy mapping!
subbie157 (2025-12-14 18:36:09+00:00): @confusedbuffalo Oh thank you so much! I appreciate the fix!
NeisBot (2025-12-13 16:20:21+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/1201512958 v3 | 7 crossings

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1512602919 v6
https://osm.org/node/11139582648 v2
https://osm.org/node/7547228970 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175873019
NeisBot (2025-12-14 08:00:24+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Oosterveld Heating and Air Conditioning"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 18:16:48+00:00): 🔴 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by https://osm.org/changeset/176018335
wolfgang8 (2025-12-13 18:14:06+00:00): Hallo,
eine kurze Anmerkung dazu - der Name der Brücke wird beim Straßen-Way üblicherweise mit bridge:name eingetragen. Damit bleibt der name-Tag für den eigentlichen Straßennamen verfügbar. Im konkreten Fall ist jedoch auch das bridge:name nicht unbedingt notwendig, da bereits ein separates man_made=bridge Objekt mit dem Brückennamen vorhanden ist.

siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:bridge:name
DerKaiserschmarren (2025-12-13 19:41:55+00:00): Danke!, das wusste ich wiederrum nicht. Ich habe es nach Vorbild dieser drei Brücken gemacht, die also eventuell evenfalls wahrscheinlich zu korregieren wären: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26254651 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26253065 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26560198
wolfgang8 (2025-12-14 08:18:09+00:00): Ja, wurden alle drei vor ca. 17 Jahren so eingetragen - war damals durchaus üblich.
DerKaiserschmarren (2025-12-14 17:28:50+00:00): Ich habe es jetzt überall wie an deinen Vorschlag angepasst. Hoffe es passt so ;)
wolfgang8 (2025-12-15 07:36:39+00:00): Danke
DerKaiserschmarren (2025-12-15 08:12:43+00:00): Bitteschön :)
Rom1 (2025-12-13 09:01:10+00:00): Bonjour, Nancy Thermal est déjà nommé avec https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159336103 Vous pouvez donc retirer les noms ajoutés aux bâtiments. Merci et bonne continuation.
Frans S (2025-12-27 11:10:10+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You are only drawing rough rectangles without taking indentations and protruding parts into account. Follow the roof lines more accurately! Now, another mapper has to correct all these issues.
Quality prevails above quantity!
Best regards
Frans S (2025-12-27 11:42:22+00:00): Check this page to see what corrections we had to make. (There are more corrections needed)
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176477183
Best regards
Danysan95 (2025-12-28 16:50:56+00:00): Ho applicato la modifica in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176538645
eggie (2025-12-13 10:34:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
b-jazz (2025-12-14 04:09:18+00:00): This change has been reverted as it introduced too many errors onto the map (along with some needed edits I'm sure). Please do not break existing relations between fairways, greens, and roughs. And please don't create lollipops as a hack workaround proper multipolygons. Please make sure you read the wiki before proceeding with more golf course edits. Thanks.
The Frozen Crusader (2025-12-14 04:17:17+00:00): Thank you for reverting the change, I really didn’t want to make any changes but couldn’t find a way to only locally change it so I was the only one affected. I needed to work around the multipolygon tag to hopefully get Chad’s TGC Designer to recognize the fairways with the OSM file. I have no need to retrace anything anymore, so once again, thank you. Fingers crossed that it works out for me, it’s been kicking my butt for weeks now. Take care.
jb54osm (2025-12-13 11:23:04+00:00): Dag Bart0031,
Tegenwoordig zetten we de POI-data op de (bestaande) adresnode (die komt uit de import vanuit BAG/Kadaster). Ik heb die data bij de adresnode toegevoegd en de losse POI verwijderd.
Paweł_M (2026-01-09 22:11:06+00:00): Hej, czemu usunąłeś część stop_position tych przystanków? Wynika to z braku narysowanych linii na drodze czy czegoś innego?
ChrissW-R1 (2025-12-14 13:40:43+00:00): Please use the right tag "cuisine" (with two i) instead of cusine.

https://osm.org/changeset/175919394
Langlaeufer (2025-12-13 10:07:45+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:class:bicycle
class:mode=-1 scheint mir nicht streng genug zu sein. Ich denke -3 wäre durchaus angemessen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175876596
Langlaeufer (2025-12-13 10:08:49+00:00): class:foot ist bisher nicht definiert.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175876596
sabas88 (2025-12-14 16:01:09+00:00): razed dovrebbe essere sulla chiave highway per farlo "sparire"
lorenzo2002 (2025-12-14 16:41:42+00:00): grazie per la correzione, ora dovrebbe essere giusto
Syl (2025-12-13 11:02:50+00:00): Bonjour, on aperçoit quelque chose dans l'herbe un peu plus au sud sur les images aériennes. Est-ce que la borne incendie pourrait être mal positionnée plutôt que d'être inexistante ?
Fchaix2 (2025-12-15 15:02:10+00:00): Hello,
Je vérifierai quand je repasserai à côté. Merci pour la remarque
Syl (2025-12-15 17:00:56+00:00): Je viens d'y passer, la borne était bien quelques mètres plus loin.
J'ai annulé la suppression et j'ai ajouté la référence.
Bonne soirée.
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-15 16:21:57+00:00): Doh, probably my accidental selection that did that in the first place.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175877274
𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ (2025-12-15 18:09:09+00:00): Hehe, that can happen to anyone if you're not being very careful 😌
literan (2025-12-13 11:26:49+00:00): ну и зачем вы вокруг вами же нарисованных территорий brownfield делаете еще одну территорию brownfield?

задумывайтесь, пожалуйста, перед правками
eggie (2025-12-13 10:41:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback   Alle begin is moeilijk.
Svp geen straatnamen gaan aanpassen. Laan van Westenenk fietspad is geen straatnaam.
Tagging van fietspaden ligt nauw. Nit zomaar tags toevoegen.
motor_vehicle=yes foot=no bicycle=yes is allemaal niet correct.
Gebouewen zijn allemaal import vanuit het kadster (BAG)  Dat is precies ingemeten. met een schuingenomen luchtfoto kun je dat niet opnieuw gaan uitlijnen. Wanneer iets niet klopt kun je dat doorgeven aan het Kadaster. 
Nieuwe import kun je aanvrage via het forum.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-13 10:44:57+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175877743
eggie (2025-12-13 10:46:27+00:00): Overkappingen en dakranden  staan  niet in de BAG. Dat is niet waar het huis staat.
eggie (2025-12-13 11:06:58+00:00): reverted by changeset #175878979

Ik heb je edits moeten terugdraaien. Het is te veel werk om al je wijzigingen apart te herstellen.
Realiseer je dat je in de editor van OSM bezig bent dat alles wat je doet ook echt op de wereld nu verkeerd wordt aangepast.
Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-13 10:44:02+00:00): Zoals al eerder gevraagd.. svp geen woningen opnieuw uitlijnen.
Ook geen wegklasse zomaar veranderen van wegen.
Dit klopt allemaal niet. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175878130

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-13 11:03:37+00:00): reverted by changeset #175878935
Gregory Peony (2025-12-15 04:29:01+00:00): Hi, it's good that you're taking care to preserve the history, however personally I would have deleted or reverted footprints this inaccurate rather than replacing their geometry, becasue this to me pretty much falls into mixing the history. You can check the history of elements with ctrl+h, before deleting to be sure there's no additional data in previous versions.

Thanks for reconfiguring and aligning the highways here too.
MK 1 (2025-12-14 19:50:17+00:00): Каде е Крива Паланка тука?
Hung Tran 9x0 (2025-12-27 15:11:06+00:00): Bạn tạo POI nên chú ý đến vị trí và địa chỉ. Tôi thấy mấy cái building bạn thêm vào nằm trong ngõ 56, nhưng bạn lại ghi là ngõ 20, không rõ là bạn không biết tên đường hay chọn sai vị trí. Mà tôi thấy thêm building như vậy cũng không có ích lắm. Nếu bạn tạo 'address' gồm số nhà (và tên tòa nhà nếu có) sẽ tốt hơn.
hieuvan (2026-01-01 02:07:49+00:00): Those features were not created by myself.
Dawid2849 (2025-12-13 12:06:00+00:00): Cześć,

czemu skasowałeś miejsca zatrzymywania się autobusów, jak tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13041167284/history

?
Krzysztof26799 (2025-12-13 12:14:10+00:00): Witaj. Zauważyłem, że jeden przystanek jest oznaczony dwoma pinezkami (punktami). Niemniej jednak na mapie na obecną chwilę pokazuje się.
Dawid2849 (2025-12-13 13:09:34+00:00): To nie były dwa punkty - jeden odpowiadał za przystanek, czyli miejsce, gdzie czekają ludzie, a drugi za miejsce, gdzie stają autobusy
Krzysztof26799 (2025-12-13 14:09:45+00:00): W większości przypadku przystanek słupek / wiata spełnia obie funkcje. Ale dziękuje za konstruktywną podpowiedź. Mam nadzieję że moja zmiana nie zaburzyła harmonii i ładu przestrzennego :)
Paweł_M (2026-01-17 11:05:21+00:00): Autobus nie zatrzymuje się na słupku lub wiecie tylko na drodze, w miejscu gdzie jest stop_position. W OSM można mapować te 2 punkty - słupek/wiatę i miejsce postoju i łączyć je relacją.
Poczytaj proszę:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_area#Elementy_relacji
Specjalnie jeździłem za tymi wszystkimi przystankami, aby zobaczyć je w terenie i dodać ich poprawne tagowanie, więc proszę uszanuj moją pracę i nie usuwaj już stop_position w powiecie niżańskim.
Paweł_M (2026-01-17 11:13:26+00:00): I dzięki za zajmowanie się przystankami. Sam zanim zacząłem w powiecie niżańskim to było kiepsko, większości brakowało lub nie miały nazw. A widzę, że robisz to też w innych powiatach.
MI na niżańskim zależy bo stąd pochodzę i chcę mieć tu dobrze ogarnięte dane
Paweł_M (2026-01-17 11:16:00+00:00): I nieużywane przystanki tzn. takie gdzie nic nie staje można oznaczyć jako
disused:highway=bus_stop
disused:public_transport=platform
Wtedy jak przywracasz je do użyteczności, bo coś zaczęło się tam zatrzymywać, wystarczy że usuniesz przedrostek "disused:", nie musisz dodawać ponownie:
highway=bus_stop
public_transport=platform
Bo potem taki przystanek ma podwójnie:
disused:highway=bus_stop
disused:public_transport=platform
highway=bus_stop
public_transport=platform