piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jrachi (2024-06-14 19:32:59+00:00): Ciao.
Hai rimosso un sentiero "non esistente" che è parte di un percorso a catasto (ECNAN440000).
Sei sicuro che il sentiero sia proprio inesistente?
Non è che forse non hai trovato l'inizio?
Magari potevi aggiungere un trail_visibility=no
Il rilevamento è stato fatto nel 2019 da uno del Parco Naturale Alpi Marittime

Se mi assicuri di avere percorso quella zona e di non avere visto nessuna traccia posso segnalare la cosa alla SOSEC che manderà qualcuno a verificare.
Ivo
Cuneotrekking (2024-06-14 19:38:38+00:00): Ciao Ivo, confermo da nostro recente sopralluogo che quel sentiero non esiste proprio e probabilmente non è mai esistito… Indicarlo sulla mappa oltre che errato è fuorviante…
Jrachi (2024-06-14 20:47:05+00:00): Grazie della velocissima risposta.
Inoltro alla SOSEC

Ivo
Jrachi (2024-06-14 20:52:46+00:00): Sulla mappa c'è la way 987493396.
Potrebbe essere un possibile collegamento al Passo del Van.
Sai se questo sentiero esiste?
Ivo
rskedgell (2024-07-25 06:05:51+00:00): Mini-roundabouts (traversable centre, road marking per TSRGD diagram 1003.4) are tagged as nodes rather than as circular ways as routing software needs to be able to differentiate between them. I realise that it is tempting to re-map them so that they look better on the map, but it is incorrect and unhelpful to data consumers. Reverted.
bxl-forever (2024-06-07 10:24:24+00:00): Hello,

Where does the "Tram Brussel Expo - Breendonk" string come from as a name?  You seem to be talking about the future tram line between Willebroek and Brussels.
https://www.delijn.be/nl/content/brabantnet/willebroek-brussel/
OsmAnd_Pieter (2024-06-07 12:02:05+00:00): https://www.delijn.be/nl/content/brabantnet-willebroek/
It starts at Breendonk. All is just proposed information.
Willebroek- Brussel Noord is indeed better, even if (in my books) there will not be any money to go beyond Heizel/Heysel.
Merlin13245 (2024-06-07 14:15:25+00:00): Hello, and welcome to open street maps!

It looks like you placed the marker for your business on an open field... I'm guessing the location is actually correct? If the building is fairly new it wouldn't show up on satellite imagery yet.

If it's not a new building just click and drag the marker on top of the actual building - it's totally OK to overlap.

Thanks for contributing to the map!
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-06-12 11:49:10+00:00): Hi Linh, this Hang Mam street before was oneway for car, twoway for motorcycle. You've changed to twoway for both car and motorcycle. I guess it's correct, right?
zorglubu (2024-06-07 14:11:09+00:00): Hello Conlinp,
your comment says "updated tags" while you just have modified the  geometries.
The modification is perfect, but it would be nice for the other contributors to try to be more explicit with your comments.
Thank you very much for your understanding ;-)
tordans (2024-06-07 10:27:44+00:00): - hw=footway+bicycle=designated ist sehr unüblich, hw=path+… ist empfohlen
- surface werte passten nicht zueinander und nicht zum mapillary bild. letzteres war von 2019, daher erstmal nichts eingetragen
- sidepath-wert ist auslegungssache, habe hier jetzt eine freie führung gewählt da großer grünstreifen daneben; korrigiere das aber gleich da die straßen daneben auf den weg verweisen mit "separate"
silversurfer83 (2024-06-07 11:32:30+00:00): Hello Michael :)

thank you for contributing to OSM. It is much appreciated.

Since your edit scrolled through my QA-feed I'd like to point you towards our wiki where some guidelines for our work are laid out. It would be nice of you to read those and follow the advice they offer:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

happy mapping and safe travels
silversurfer83
Pt873 (2024-06-07 16:24:32+00:00): Edição incorreta. A região esteve em obras e o traçado está sendo modificado.
Palary (2024-06-10 10:29:55+00:00): Thank you Pt873 for reverting the changeset. I will be more cautious while performing the edits going further. Happy Mapping!
b-holdet (2024-06-09 08:32:55+00:00): Er du uenig i, at der er lavet en plan over placeringen af Kildedal By siden du sletter?
Skovluskeren (2024-06-09 20:44:00+00:00): Placeringen/størrelse er forkert, der mangler ufatteligt mange dispositioner og der er stadig ikke en eneste vedtaget lokalplan.
osmviborg (2024-06-10 05:33:41+00:00): Læs videre her: https://dokument.plandata.dk/20_11287547_1702033240839.pdf
Skovluskeren (2024-06-10 05:57:53+00:00): Den skal først i økonomiudvalget i morgen og efterfølgende i kommunalbestyrelsen.
osmviborg (2024-06-10 06:30:01+00:00): Det kan man læse om her: https://ballerup.dk/sites/default/files/agman/Publication3426/enclosures/55.pdf
Lokai (2024-06-08 06:24:44+00:00): Hallo,

Parkplatz wieder hergestellt und als Privat gekennzeichnet. Anzahl der Plätze entfernt.
Merlin13245 (2024-06-07 14:11:53+00:00): This looks great! If only all businesses took the time to take down all of these details... Wow!

Thanks for contributing to the map!
Dimitar155 (2024-06-10 13:59:37+00:00): Hi Great User, What's your source for removing the name in this part of the street?
BCNorwich (2024-06-07 19:05:50+00:00): Fiction removed.
ghostrider44 (2024-06-15 10:06:37+00:00): Hallo Kokolakopletscho,
schau dir mal folgende Seite an:
https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BW/DE-BW-VVS-Analysis.html#bus_536 
Laut Chronik hast du mit dem iD-Editor in diesem Bereich Änderungen vorgenommen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5213373 

Nun stimmen die Busrelationen 536, 541 und 542 nicht mehr.
Was ich dir bei der Linie 413 geschrieben habe:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152460487 
gilt auch hier.
Bei der Busrelation müssen die Teilstücke in der korrekten Reihenfolge aufgeführt werden wie sie der Bus auch fährt.

Der iD-Editor eignet sich m.E. absolut nicht für die Bearbeitung von Busrelationen. Dafür sollte der JOSM verwendet werden. Die einzelnen Wegstücke müssen jedenfalls an der richtigen Stelle in der korrekten Reihenfolge aufgenommen werden. Bringst du die Relationen wieder in Ordnung?

Gruß ghostrider44
ghostrider44 (2024-07-07 11:28:47+00:00): Hallo Kokolakopletscho,
nachdem du dich leider nicht gemeldet hast, habe ich die von dir beschädigten Busrelationen 536, 541 und 542 repariert.
Gruß ghostrider44
BR_pebble (2024-07-29 10:17:00+00:00): Hello Kingsley AMANKWE
Thank you for mapping!
I have Created missing highway 8.464676, 8.6294523
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
BCNorwich (2024-06-09 06:05:50+00:00): Hi, I've reverted the change to this road as you somehow duplicated most of it.

Regards Bernard.
Quaternion (2024-06-07 18:29:26+00:00): Aus der Ferne schwer zu beurteilen. Falls abgesenkte Bordsteine im Spiel sein sollten, wäre gegebenenfalls highway=service in Erwägung zu ziehen.
aceman444 (2026-04-29 23:38:52+00:00): Hi, please do not randomly touch buildings that are sourced from ZBGIS (Slovak cadastre map), especially going by aerial imagery, that is less detailed. Unless they clearly do not match, which is not the case here. You also changed the name of the hockey stadium. What is the source for that?
stadiaarcadia (2026-05-11 17:55:32+00:00): Okay, but this edit is from two years ago...
surveyor54 (2024-06-09 08:33:44+00:00): Hallo Senihtu,
mit iD-Datenprobleme behoben  kann ich leider nicht anfangen, da ich JOSM benutze.
Was du hier eingetragen hast, ist nicht richtig.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6917410466/history/5

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9534357959/history/2

Ich war dort und habe es bereits korrigiert.
Gruß surveyor54
Senihtu (2024-06-09 18:24:40+00:00): Die Changeset-Beschreibung war evtl. etwas unscharf. iD meint, in dem Geschäft eine Filiale einer Kette (Stichwort brand) zu erkennen und hat mir deshalb entsprechende Änderungen vorgeschlagen, die ich angenommen habe. Wenn ich falsch lag, dann mach es rückgäng. Wenn die Geschäfte nicht zur genannten Kette gehören, dann könnte man evtl. noch not:"brand" eintragen. 
Wenn Du vor Ort bist/warst, dann wirst Du Recht haben...
GPar (2024-06-10 16:42:47+00:00): Ciao, quella non è una stopway, ma soltanto un'area pavimentata che non ha i requisiti per il transito degli aeromobili, infatti non l'abbiamo pubblicata su AIP. 
Puoi eliminarla per favore?  
Grazie
Francesco Zanaboni (2024-06-11 09:17:50+00:00): Ciao, l'ho taggata secondo la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dstopway
Mi sembra che rientri come definizione, no?
GPar (2024-06-11 10:06:43+00:00): C'è scritto "The surface is prepared to enable it to support an aeroplane, without causing structural damage" !!
E questa non rientra perchè non ha la portanza, nè le distanze a norma previste da EASA CS-ADR-DSN, quindi non può essere usata come stopway

Per favore se non siete del settore non modificate le piste di volo. Grazie
Francesco Zanaboni (2024-06-11 11:45:53+00:00): Va bene, allora lo tolgo, in questo caso l'avevo taggato solo guardando le immagini satellitari.

P.S. non è questione di non essere del settore, ho taggato senza verificare dovutamente le caratteristiche
Francesco Zanaboni (2024-06-11 11:48:41+00:00): Way rimossa https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152539485
mavl (2024-06-22 11:38:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 153025651, 153025658, 153025634, 153025596, 153025615, 153025678 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources].
miluethi (2024-06-07 12:23:48+00:00): Beatrice,

I deleted all your recent buildings, the shapes are much bigger (2x-3x) than the building shown on the sat imagery. Please narrow the shapes to match exactly the satellite imagery.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
eggie (2024-06-07 13:30:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Negreheb (2024-06-24 06:20:52+00:00): Hallo Rodrigo Menegon, kann es sein, dass du hier nur ein bisschen ausprobieren wolltest? Ich bin mir relativ sicher, dass IN dem Annateich kein Trinkwasserbrunnen ist. 
Bitte vorsichtig sein, wenn du etwas hochlädst, ist das direkt in der Datenbank. 
Wir werden deine Edits rückgängig machen, wenn von dir keine Antwort bis Mittwoch kommt. 
Alles gute!
--------------------
Olá Rodrigo Menegon, será que só queria experimentar alguma coisa aqui? Tenho a certeza de que não existe nenhum poço de água potável na lagoa Anna. 
Por favor, tenha cuidado, se carregar alguma coisa, ela fica diretamente na base de dados. 
Se não responderem até quarta-feira, anularemos as vossas edições. 
Tudo de bom! (with Deepl translated)
Gonéo (2024-06-18 08:41:07+00:00): Les travaux ne sont pas terminés mais la piste était ouverte ce matin. Je te laisse faire la bascule ?
eggie (2024-06-07 13:31:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Anas masuris (2024-06-14 17:59:57+00:00): The park has been already delimited:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23041563

There's no need to add leisure=park to trees
miluethi (2024-07-07 19:00:06+00:00): Hi Jitendra,

I noticed that you added quite a lot of new buildings very carefully shaped.

As an additional step, I would suggest that you square the shapes out. It's easy - select one or several shapes and press the "Q" key.
+99% of all buildings are square.

Thank you for your contributions to OSM Nicaragua.
Falsernet (2024-06-12 19:48:59+00:00): It's not correct to remove a road completely when it's closed or under construction. According to the council it is expected to reopen in September. As such I've readded the section as being under construction (see https://www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/news/2023/part-a509-be-closed-monday-25-september-2023 )
MKBE_ (2024-06-13 09:20:50+00:00): The road has been dug up, there is nothing there. That’s why I straight up deleted it
Falsernet (2024-06-13 17:01:58+00:00): I'd be very surprised if they didn't repave it again in the foreseeable future, even if the council wasn't saying they expect it to reopen in September.

I definitely think it should remain as highway=construction with that in mind, plus the likelihood of there being other subsurface infrastructure there, and the unlikelihood they would use the corridor for anything but a road. Also, this will prevent lazy people from re-adding the road as if it were open, without checking - seeing a big gap in the road is an immediate red flag.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-07 12:40:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11591874709
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/704392063

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
5m4u9 (2024-06-08 05:44:32+00:00): Gracis por hacer el survey. si entiendo bien, con lo que actualizas dices que está terminada de asfaltar y está abierta al tráfico?
Merlin13245 (2024-06-07 14:09:33+00:00): I see two "The Hormone Zone" markers on the map here - the node you created in this changeset, as well as an area that outlines the physical building.

Are the other businesses in this building part of "The Hormone Zone"? If so, the node and the area should be merged into a single object. (Hold [Shift] and click on both objects, then [Right Click] and "Merge") If not, then the area should have it's metadata removed and be marked as a generic "Healthcare Facility".

Oh, and welcome to openstreetmaps! Thanks for contributing to the map!
Sakari_N (2026-05-02 19:17:33+00:00): Palautettu sisäkäytävät. Lisään näihin vielä access=permissive -tagin kaikkiin, joka on mielestäni lähinnä sopivin. Lisää keskustelua: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178618305

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182132018
eggie (2024-06-07 13:36:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap (OSM) 

Je hebt je aangemeld om een bijdrage te leveren en dat inmiddels ook gedaan. Je kunt je nu ‘amateur-cartograaf’ noemen; onderling gebruiken we meestal de term ‘mapper’ ;) Elke mapper is allereerst en vooral waardevol vanwege lokale kennis. Het is juist die lokale kennis die OSM laat uitstijgen boven welk ‘concurrent’ dan ook. OSM is daardoor niet alleen beter, maar meestal ook veel actueler. Niet voor niets wordt OSM door veel instanties gebruikt. Daarom is het leveren van bijdragen aan OSM een serieuze zaak. Graag aandacht voor de volgende punten: 

 

In het begin worden je bijdragen bekeken door meer ervaren mappers..... Uiteraard om te helpen.  Ze zullen soms commentaar leveren, tips geven. Je krijgt dan automatisch een mail op het mailadres dat je bij aanmelding hebt opgegeven. Controleer dat dus regelmatig. En geef reactie op een commentaar, zodat duidelijk is dat je het hebt gelezen. Je kunt ook specifiek aangeven in editor iD en JOSM of iemand naar je edits wil kijken door het hokje aan te vinken bij: “Ik zou graag hebben dat iemand mijn bewerkingen nakijkt” 

Beperk jezelf. Alle begin is moeilijk en iedereen maakt fouten, zelfs de meest ervaren mappers. Maak niet meer dan een paar wijzigingen per dag in het begin. Maak niet in één sessie wijzigingen die ver uit elkaar liggen. Eventuele fouten kunnen dan snel en gemakkelijk hersteld worden. 

 

Nuttige links. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM (een introductiepagina met veel nuttige tips onder het kopje ‘Waar moet je op letten als je de kaart gaat bewerken?’) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features (overzicht van vrijwel alle elementen die in OSM gebruikt worden) 

https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43 

(Het Nederlandstalig deel van het forum; de plek om vragen te stellen en ideeën op te doen) 

Voor overleg kun je ook terecht op https://discord.gg/q6HnfNZ “Openstreetmap World is een internationale discord server waar mappers van over de hele wereld samenkomen om elkaar te helpen en om over OSM te praten. Er is ook een Nederlands subkanaal voor Nederlandse mappers onderling”. 

Regelmatig is er een ‘onlinebijeenkomst’ via Jit.si Meet. Iedereen is van harte welkom. Houd een volgende datum in de gaten op het forum. 

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/woensdag-15-maart-online-community-bijeenkomst/4467 

Vragen staat vrij. Je kunt op het bovengenoemde OSM forum terecht met vragen, maar ook altijd ondergetekende een PB sturen. 
Feedback  Je hebt van het schoolterrein een gebouw gemaakt. Dat lijkt me niet correct.
In dit geval zou je er ook landuse=education van kunnen maken.. Vaak zetten er dan toch nog amenity=school bij omdat education nog niet rendert op de standaardkaart.
Een gebouw klopt niet.


 

Met vriendelijke groet, 

Eggie 

namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-06-07 13:53:53+00:00): Achter de school heb je nu deel een fietspad getekend, maar dat eindigt op een voetpad richting brug. Staat er een bord fietspad tegenwoordig?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-06-07 14:23:23+00:00): Het gebouw heb ik verwijderd
sanderk35 (2024-06-07 20:48:41+00:00): Het pad is nu een fietspad met een voetpad ernaast, er staat een bord.
eggie (2024-06-08 04:08:30+00:00): 👍 oke..
Maar is het wandelpad naar het bruggetje richting andere wijk misschien nu ook aangepast?
Mapse..
eggie
sanderk35 (2024-06-08 21:47:39+00:00): Nee, ik loop daar altijd overheen als ik naar school ga. Er staat ook een voetpad bord (die met de volwassene en kind) aan de fietspad zijde
eggie (2024-06-09 04:52:07+00:00): Mooi.. dan is het zo correct.
VLD549 (2024-06-25 12:14:28+00:00): Hi, could you indicate what source was used to come to the conclusion to change the name from moochie frozen yogurt to Moochie? It seems that the place is permanently closed, regardless of the correct writing.

Thank you in advance!
Frans S (2024-06-07 13:16:23+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152375871
Frans S (2024-06-07 13:17:33+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152375922
Frans S (2024-06-07 13:20:10+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152375963
Frans S (2024-06-07 13:24:28+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Yards mapped as building
Part of building mapped instead of cpl building.
Not all buildings squared.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152376022
Dodko (2024-06-09 09:00:08+00:00): Značka name:en sa nepoužíva ak vodopád nemá meno.

Prípadne použiť https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:noname%3Dyes
DuckDuckNick (2024-06-14 11:10:11+00:00): Ďakujem za opravu. Prepáčte, som nováčik.
Frans S (2024-06-07 13:21:33+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152376081
Xvtn (2024-06-08 17:58:04+00:00): Hi! I see you added an overlapping building feature for the Maverik Stadium bleachers. Have you ever been here in person to confirm that? Last time I observed these on-site, the seating area wasn't a building, there's no way to go inside/under it, and it doesn't extend upward from the ground.

The OSM wiki says about the building= tag:
"In OpenStreetMap, a building is a man-made structure with a roof, standing more or less permanently in one place."
The Maverik Stadium bleachers don't have a roof. Because of that and the other things I've mentioned, you shouldn't tag them as a building.
Thanks, and please let me know your thoughts.
stadiaarcadia (2024-06-09 07:39:25+00:00): Hi, thank you for your reply. Yes, that's a good point. But I've read somewhere that it's also allowed this way for bleachers like this. Only if it's labelled as a stadium building. I'll search for the discussion.
Frans S (2024-06-07 13:26:17+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Clustered buildings. 4 marked as 1 building

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152376250
eggie (2024-06-07 14:25:46+00:00): Dag osmdg,

Tja   dat is de vraag. De voorgaande mapper vond van wel. Hie iets rendert op de kaart is aan de kaartenmaker.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=152376311

MVG
eggie