piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
willkmis (2023-09-25 15:31:12+00:00): Hi Olga,
Thanks for replying. Unfortunately, this response raises even more questions from me regarding your methods. The North American Roads database you linked to appears to contain only major roads. They appear on my system as blue lines, and if I click them, data such as object IDs and speed limits appear. "Santa Monica Place" does not appear to be in the database. Instead, I see Santa Monica Place as a label in the underlying base map, which appears to be from Esri. I think copying from this map would be prohibited in OSM, since I think it is copyrighted.

Moreover, even if it were allowed, I see no evidence from this map that the pathways themselves are named. The label appears to be labeling a location, not a road. Note how the label isn't inside the roadway, like it is for nearby Broadway or the 3rd Street Promenade.

Is there any other indication that makes you believe this path through the shopping center is named? If the roads database really was your only source for this edit, I believe you've misinterpreted it and that this should be reverted.

Best,
Will
Olga_Kovalevskaya (2023-09-26 07:32:58+00:00): Hi, Will!
Thank you for your feedback.
We do not copy the Esri data, we refer to them as the source. In this case, they confirm that this place is really called "Santa Monica Place", and we believed that the pedestrian path that passes through it could also be called that.
Our team will reconsider the approach to adding names based on trust in the request of users, so that such situations do not arise in the future.
I canceled this edit.
With respect,
Olga
willkmis (2023-09-30 05:49:57+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for clarifying, by source I guess you mean as a second check? Because otherwise using as a source sounds quite like copying.

In any case, in the future it might be better to refer to this source as Esri itself, maybe using this link directly to their map: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html. Citing the website you sent makes it look like you were using data from a public domain database, which I found misleading.
Happy mapping,
Will
user_5359 (2023-09-22 19:39:14+00:00): Revert Diskussion siehee https://www.osm.org/changeset/141590814, Änderung https://www.osm.org/changeset/141618713 und https://www.osm.org/changeset/141619312
zstadler (2024-02-18 09:33:00+00:00): Why did you change the boundary of the national park, again?
R0bst3r (2023-09-24 17:57:31+00:00): I reverted this changeset because your edit requested for review added wrong tags on a railway instead only your relevant edit on a bridge.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141693750
R0bst3r (2023-09-24 18:02:38+00:00): Hallo RalfZiegler,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft und habe folgende Anmerkungen:
* Du wolltest wohl den Namen der Jahnbrücke ändern. Hab ich entsprechend angepasst.
* Den Rest hab ich revertiert, den komischerweise ist auch die Banhstrecke in der Nähe zu einer Brücke geändert worden. Dies war wohl nicht beabsichtigt. 
Zur Einführung empfehle ich den Beginners' guide auf wiki.osm.org. Dort findet man auch Anleitungen zu allen Themen. Ansonsten wird einem unter community.osm.org gerne geholfen.
Viel Erfolg noch und nicht entmutigen lassen!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141591263
SzymonH (2023-11-06 10:20:43+00:00): Połączyłem z sąsiednią restauracją, wcześniej oznaczoną jako Lukr: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143686178
Florek89 (2023-09-30 13:45:21+00:00): Dodałeś bieżnię drugi raz przy szkole w Kamionie 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1209974746

gdzie od 5 lat bieżnia była dodana:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/650801899

Usuwam ją i zachęcam do szczegółowszego opisu komentarzy oraz wprowadzania zmian z lepszą geometrią, bo bieżnia składająca się z 10 węzłów jest okropna do oglądania, tym bardziej że była bieżnia z 25 węzłami.
user_5359 (2023-09-23 05:46:19+00:00): Revert nicht erlaubte Quelle siehe Diskussion siehee https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141590814
user_6446486 (2023-09-22 08:19:58+00:00): В случае отката правки с невразумительным комментарием вроде "updated" и приведения в прежнее состояние с дублированием - будет отправлена жалоба в DWG на вандализм
user_5359 (2023-09-23 05:49:18+00:00): Revert nicht erlaubte Quelle siehe Diskussion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141590814
user_5359 (2023-09-23 05:50:23+00:00): Revert nicht erlaubte Quelle siehe Diskussion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141590814
PPete2 (2025-04-11 07:47:49+00:00): Hi, könntest du bitte https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4006454 beantworten, danke.
muchichka_s (2023-09-22 10:54:49+00:00): тег name використовується для власного імені об'єкту. Всю іншу інформацію треба писати в інші теги

"Пересихає", "Кусають пси", "Недавно чищена" не є власними назвами
Pink Duck (2023-09-22 09:05:50+00:00): Looks to be a GUID reference, as in globally unique, so probably no need for the :GB suffix.
Robert Whittaker (2023-09-22 09:17:11+00:00): AIUI, those UUIDs are actually generated randomly, so I don't think they're technically guaranteed to be unique. But in any case, it's a GB specific data-set, and I think that's the important thing for the OSM key.
Pink Duck (2023-09-22 09:36:54+00:00): You leave out addr:country in postal addresses based on geolocation. UUID is universally unique, even beyond Earth. The statistical chance of randomly produced clash of GUID is phenomenally low. However, if it freaks you out that someone searching by GUID might possibly one day find two instances of a circuit, then fine :)
Robert Whittaker (2023-09-22 10:00:54+00:00): The main issue is that "The Circuit" (as a name) might not be globally unique. Including the GB in the OSM key, gives users more a a clue as to what the underlying dataset might be. Yes you could use geolocation - but then what's the point of ever including the country code in a ref key?
Pink Duck (2023-09-22 10:06:22+00:00): The computational effort to produce and match bounding polygons for search versus database key text value essentially. Can get a sense of that from XAPI poly: documentation.

Fair point about The Circuit identifier being the less than unique thing.
pitscheplatsch (2023-10-15 11:46:00+00:00): reverted
fititnt (2023-12-13 01:07:49+00:00): Olá Alexandre. Qual source= da informação que você adicionou em  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5697430124/history ?

A pergunta é porque eu estou tendo dificuldade de encontrar uma Igreja com nome de "Hedera Cosméticos"
fititnt (2023-12-13 05:06:35+00:00): Olá Alexandre, agora uma segunda pergunta, muito pertinente, pois parece um pouco de coincidência: qual a fonte do name= exato "Zump Print Ltda - Digifoco Impressão Digital" em https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1209871509/history?

Conforme comentário seu em https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142038996 sabemos que você estava fazendo apenas de forma remota

> "A referência usada durante a campanha foi o Bing Maps, mas o foco eram edificações e vias, não pontos.
> Eu conheço um pouco a área (já estive uma vez, há alguns anos)."

Enfim, tem outras edições nessa área que envolvem nomes, e você adicionou vários deles sem dar detalhes. Essa pergunta é pertinente porque o nível de coincidência é semelhante a um mapa comercial (de onde não se pode copiar dados) que não tem licença que permita copiar para OSM.
Alexandre Pereira Santos (2023-12-13 09:17:37+00:00): Olá fitting,
Para mudar o nome dos tags, eu usei o Google Street View, Google Maps e os sites das lojas como referencia. Primeiro notei que havia uma diferenca entre os tags da loja "Chevrolet Pretto Encantado" (logo ao norte destes pontos) e a imagem aérea Bing que estávamos usando. Resolvi ajustar conferindo pelo que estava no Google e depois no site da Pretto. A partir disso, ajustei outros tags com informacoes das fontes citadas acima.
Alexandre Pereira Santos (2023-12-13 09:18:26+00:00): Aliás, pelo Street View, nao havia igreja alguma. Entao a tag estaria errada, devendo ser ajustada para comércio.
Константин Гам (2023-09-22 09:11:09+00:00): Типы линий менять на _link не стоит, вы нарушаете граф дорог
micccey (2024-02-20 09:24:26+00:00): Ist der Name der Relation hier so gewollt? :D
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6353049
GerdP (2024-02-20 09:28:09+00:00): Wahrscheinlich. Ich habe den Namen nicht erfunden, bin der Aufforderung aber teilweise gefolgt.
H@mlet (2023-09-22 17:37:21+00:00): Bonjour,
votre ajout vient en doublon du bâtiment déjà correctement taggué : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177677226
De ce fait il sera supprimé.
Si nécessaire vous pouvez modifier les tags du bâtiment pour les mettre à jour.
Cordialement.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141594173
jcr83 (2023-09-22 20:21:23+00:00): Si c'est un chemin communal, est-il correct de le décrire comme une piste agricole ?
habi (2023-09-22 09:15:18+00:00): I'm here in the region because of https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3900622
habi (2023-09-22 09:15:14+00:00): I'm here in the region because of https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3900622
habi (2023-09-22 09:20:46+00:00): I'm here in the region because of https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3900622
irik (2023-09-22 13:40:37+00:00): Poprawiam na to jak było. Nazwa obejmuje to wzgórze, jest ono charakterystyczne, istnieje w Państwowym Rejestrze Nazw Geograficznych.
mapboy63 (2023-09-28 16:43:44+00:00): Why have ways 25694104, 25694054, etc. been tagged as bicycle=no?
hughrt (2023-09-29 10:00:28+00:00): Hi, thanks for bringing this mistake to my attention. I've amended the path now.
mapboy63 (2023-09-29 15:26:07+00:00): Thanks.
user_5359 (2023-09-23 05:51:17+00:00): Revert nicht erlaubte Quelle siehe Diskussion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141590814
user_5359 (2023-09-23 05:52:33+00:00): Revert nicht erlaubte Quelle siehe Diskussion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141590814
martinst (2023-09-22 15:31:22+00:00): Das Hotel ist schon als Gebäude (Way 190816284) eingetragen. Doppelt macht keinen Sinn. Falls das Hotel als Node erfasst werden soll bitte die Daten vom Gebäude entfernen.
jcr83 (2023-12-10 15:31:59+00:00): Hi,
When you map in France, please use french imagery, not ESRI, which is not aligned correctly ! Please update the "lac de la Buissonière".
JJIglesias (2023-09-22 18:09:07+00:00): Buen trabajo, gracias por tus contribuciones
abbess (2023-09-22 10:51:50+00:00): New housing scheme being built https://www.dwh.co.uk/new-homes/dev000937-seven-sisters/
Đuro Jiří (2024-07-09 18:33:21+00:00): Bok Lusitania, samo te želim obavijestiti da sam upravo ispravio ovaj "čudni" kružni tok.  Dodali ste kružni tok s različitim jednosmjernim trakom od drugog traka.

Olá Lusitânia, gostaria apenas de informar que acabei de corrigir esta "estranha" rotunda.  Você adicionou uma rotatória com uma faixa de mão única diferente da segunda faixa.
Đuro Jiří (2024-07-09 18:33:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1210008173/history#map=19/37.19556/-7.42609&layers=N
topolusitania (2024-07-10 09:58:39+00:00): thank you for correcting a mistake ;-)
bxl-forever (2023-09-22 11:18:55+00:00): Hello,

Could you have a second look at the name tag of this building, please.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110901960

name does not match name:fr - name:nl
Which of these should be changed?
JhowieNitnek (2023-09-22 11:32:32+00:00): Thank you I fixed it
SomeoneElse (2023-09-29 23:10:08+00:00): Hello AzerAkhundov,
Can you explain the name change here?  A natural=peak in a historically Armenian-speaking area had its name changed from an Armenian name to "2599"?  This seems at best unlikely.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
AzerAkhundov (2023-09-30 05:12:30+00:00): Hello!
First of all, the place you called historically Armenian-speaking area has nothing to do with the Nagorno-Karabakh area which is considered as a place where majority was Armenian in Soviet times. The peak is located in Kalbajar district which never was a part of Nagorno-Karabakh. It was occupied in 1993 and it is not even Nagorno-Karabakh area.
Second thing is the rules of Openstreetmap. According to the rules, names should be in language of those who currentlly control area. The same is the reason that whole occupied areas were in Armenian for years. When I tried to change some names, I was even warned by OSM moderators, because at that time area was controlled by Armenian forces. As of today, the area is under Azerbaijani control. So, the names should be in Azerbaijani at first.
SomeoneElse (2023-09-30 09:53:22+00:00): Hello AzerAkhundov,

You have written "Second thing is the rules of Openstreetmap. According to the rules, names should be in language of those who currentlly control area.".  This is categorically not the case.  The OSMF policy on such things can be found at https://osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf .  The people in the area do not suddenly refer to mountain peaks by other names just because one country's tanks are currently in the area.
I would actually expect here that there would be multiple name tags - name:az for Azerbaijani, name:hy for Armenian, perhaps even name:ru to reflect a Russian name due to the extensive period in the Russian empire from the 1800s.  The "name" tag will usually match one of the name:language tags - whatever people locally call it.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
AzerAkhundov (2023-09-30 10:30:45+00:00): The same is applicable to other villages and towns. Most of the residential areas were destroyed and nobody was living in them. But why were their historical names changed to Armenian? I repeat, I was warned in early 2020 when I changed town name Zangilan. I was told that, it is controlled by Armenians and signs are in Armenian there, so it should appear in Armenian. But historically this place was called Zangilan even in Soviet era. I waited and after the war edited again and brought back its historical name. Question is, why it is ok when names are changed to Armenian after occupation, but it is not ok when they are turned back to original ones in Azerbaijani after deoccupation?
AzerAkhundov (2023-09-30 10:31:52+00:00): Also, I agree that there should be multiple names. But which one will appear on the map? As the area is considered as Azerbaijan, it will be logical that they appear in Azerbaijani. Nobody lives there now.
SomeoneElse (2023-09-30 10:45:56+00:00): Re "But which one will appear on the map" it depends on the map, and (depending on the map) may depend on the language that you have your browser or phone set to.
AzerAkhundov (2023-09-30 11:03:04+00:00): When editing, there is a "Name" bar above and many "Multilingual name" bars below. I noticed that the one in the "Name" bar is displayed on the map.
SomeoneElse (2023-09-30 11:12:26+00:00): By "the map" I'm guessing you're referring to the one on openstreetmap.org listed as "standard" (see e.g. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Featured_tile_layers ).
However, there are many other maps created with OSM data, and things such as OsmAnd will likely take your preferred language into consideration before showing you map labels.
AzerAkhundov (2023-09-30 11:21:12+00:00): Yes, exactly. I generally use openstreetmap.org in standard version. I thought if you change in opensteetmap.org it affects all other maps with OSM data, so there is no difference.
SomeoneElse (2023-10-01 09:58:08+00:00): What you see in the "standard" map layer at openstreetmap.org is only a tiny subset of the actual tags stored in the OSM database.  Other maps may show names from "name:language" tags based on either the area of the map being viewed or the location of the user or the user's preferred language (in an app or browser).  Different other maps may use wikidata / wikipedia to obtain names in languages not even in OSM.
kagebar (2023-09-22 14:18:18+00:00): Досить давати власні назви яких не існує. Переношу в опис
literan (2023-09-23 10:57:13+00:00): зачем здесь прикрепили забор к линии дороги? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1210014197

вы системно портите данные и рисуете крайне небрежно, судя по всему, это обусловлено спешкой

при продолжении я буду просить вашей блокировки
literan (2023-09-23 10:55:52+00:00): нет, так тяп-ляп не надо. Здесь и лес, и дороги, и здание, а вы на все это сверху полигон луга накинули.
Map-Peter (2023-09-22 19:06:47+00:00): Hallo Braatzer,
 
willkommen bei OSM! :-)
 
Ich habe das Neubaugebiet eben mit einem aktuelleren Luftbild nochmal komplett aktualisiert.  
Das war vor ca. fünf Monaten schwierig das alles möglichst genau einzuzeichnen nur mit Hilfe von vor Ort gemachten Fotos.
 
Beachte bitte in Zukunft unbedingt das Copyright, wenn du die Daten nicht vor Ort selbst erhebst: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Copyright .
 
Gruß Peter
gscscnd (2023-09-22 16:03:24+00:00): 1. unclassified to zupełnie inny typ drogi, tutaj może być service.
2. Z dwojga złego zamiast area:highway=service w tym przypadku lepsze wydaje mi się area=yes highway=service. Obecny tag służy do zaznaczania obszaru drogi o określonym kierunku ruchu, wszelkie place nie bardzo do tego pasują.
3. W miarę możliwości dodawaj do zestawów zmian odniesienie (albo link do osm.org, albo chociaż numer) do zamykanej uwagi, oraz do tej uwagi odniesienie do zestawu zmian.
user_5359 (2023-09-22 19:26:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dcoworking.
mueschel (2023-09-24 09:52:23+00:00): You and your colleagues introduced new tags here: 

maxheight trimble
maxheighttribble
maxheighttrimble
maxweighttrimble
hgvtrimble

Please explain what all these tags mean.
devasen (2023-09-27 09:40:25+00:00): Hi mueschel,
Thank you for taking the time to look over the changeset. These tags are applicable only for our internal edits, however owing to a technical error they got published on OSM. 
We have identified all the changesets belonging to these tags added by the editors and have deleted the incorrect attributes/syntax in the changesets #141790368 ,#141790142 & #141790274. We apologize for this error and will be cautious while contributing on OSM.
Regards,
devasen
kapazao (2023-09-22 14:17:25+00:00): Are you sure? You are the one who change it to neighbourhood 3 years ago.
Also you created Santa Bárbara as a Suburb, then you changed it to a neighbourhood, later to hamlet and now is a neighbourhood.
You should understand that you must explain your changesets better than you do, because we cannot know why do you update the tag now and we do not know if you will change it more times in the future.
Regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141602442
dieghernan (2023-09-23 09:35:50+00:00): Hi kapazo.

Sorry for the mess. 3 years ago I made some mistakes on this, as I was not aware of OSM ES main criteria for this kind of places, but as per the OSM ES guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas#N%C3%BAcleos_de_poblaci%C3%B3n) I do believe this is correct at it is now.

Explanation:
- San Hermenegildo should be a hamlet (population < 1000 and not the main village of the municipality) as it has its own official recognized status at sub-municipality level (see https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/institutodeestadisticaycartografia/sima/nucleos.htm?CodMuni=18018).

- Santa Barbara is not officialy recognized as such but it is a recognized neighbourhood used informaly by locals. This is also supported by the fact that the single street is named as Barrio (Neighboudhood in English) as per the https://www.callejerodeandalucia.es/

By last, thanks for your feedback. I have GIS background but after your comments I think I need to improve my understanding of OSM criterion. I would try to make it better on further edits, and provide better comments on my changesets.

Sorry for the long thread
dieghernan (2023-09-23 09:38:40+00:00): See page 9 for Santa Barbara on https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/institutodeestadisticaycartografia/prodCartografia/toponimia/itaca/validados/ITACA_Alquife.pdf (official document)
kapazao (2023-09-24 13:04:01+00:00): Thank you for your answer and contributions.
I know you are trying to do it in a good way and I wanted to warn you about the editions to avoid a big problem later.
It is good to check the wiki or asking people when you are not sure about editing something. Also using validators after some editions will help you to avoid making mistakes and you will learn some tricks.

I am not sure what is your main language so I was using english, but I would prefer spanish if you can :)

If you need help you can ask me or spanish community when you need it.

Regards
MKnight (2023-09-22 13:41:04+00:00): Moin, Du hast hier Busrelationen gelöscht, warum?
ericaufkurs (2023-09-22 16:44:56+00:00): Abend, teilweise wurden Busrelationen gelöscht, weil ich Haltestellen die falsch platziert waren gelöscht und dafür neue angelegt habe. Bei anderen ist mir wohl ein Fehler unterlaufen, den ich ausbessern werde.

Danke für den Hinweis
user_5359 (2023-09-23 05:53:23+00:00): Revert nicht erlaubte Quelle siehe Diskussion https://www.osm.org/changeset/141590814
Giblet (2023-10-23 20:41:50+00:00): Hi azaaa, I can confirm that this school is not actually a cemetery, a prison, or a walmart. Please reach out if you have questions about editing in OpenStreetMap. I will be reverting these changes.
Giblet (2023-10-23 20:41:55+00:00): Hi azaaa, I can confirm that this school is not actually a cemetery, a prison, or a walmart. Please reach out if you have questions about editing in OpenStreetMap. I will be reverting these changes.
SekeRob (2023-10-16 13:59:56+00:00): Hi,

For good order, the roles for the ski area segments has to be 'outer', not 'inner' . Notably you tagged both the subareas and the MP relation with the same tags. Within a multipolygon the feature tags only go on the multipolygon relation. Best is you move the names to single nodes centered within the individual areas. That might facilitate the for the names to show on the map.

ciao
nick-28 (2024-06-14 14:40:11+00:00): Hallo Nod5t5,

wieso hast Du hier einen zweiten Node für die Bushaltestelle Langenhagen/Silbersee eingetragen (und mehrfach bearbeitet)? Hier gibt es definitiv nur eine Haltestelle. Ich wollte schon löschen, dachte aber, ich frage vorher lieber nochmal nach.

Gruß, Nick
Nod5t5 (2024-06-14 15:34:31+00:00): Hallo Nick, 
wie ich das übersehen konnte, daß der Knoten doppelt ist, ist schon ein wenig merkwürdeig, Ich habe den Knoten gelöscht. 
Die letzten Bearbeitung des Knotens resultieren daher, daß ich gestern in der Gegend mit Street Complete unterwegs war. Da dieser Knoten ja unvollständig war, habe ich diesen auch bearbeitet., daß ich diesen Knoten vor 9 Monaten selbst erstellt habe, ist wohl eher in den Kontext von "Per Anhalter durch die Galaxis" einzuordnen
gscholz (2023-09-24 06:19:01+00:00): Hi Angela,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways and displaced ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=47.43931&lat=6.75524&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141603631

Especially way 673886674 is affected here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/673886674

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
balint36 (2023-09-25 14:27:22+00:00): Are you sure you checked it very correctly?
Because the vending machine with E44 ref number is not here.
bkil (2023-09-26 09:44:45+00:00): Did the quest say "check ref"?
balint36 (2023-09-26 12:09:42+00:00): Ref does not matter. The user during the survey (Survey if places still exist) checked 3 vending machines however there are no 3 vending machines there, only 2. How do I know? I was also this place on 22nd September and I saw only 2. His survey is phony.
Last evening (25th September) I've checked the ref numbers then I saw E44 is missing.