piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mcliquid (2024-06-24 11:50:55+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Barroszt (2024-06-16 18:30:43+00:00): Proszę przestać niszczyć mapy OpenStreetMap!
ivanbranco (2024-08-27 07:51:46+00:00): HI Srdjan023,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6821253583/history

I see you recently edited this element. Maybe you know what kind of place=* value should it have? Also do you know if the current place value is an alt_name=*?
Adam Dunn (2024-06-17 02:23:33+00:00): Hello, and thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. It looks like you have directly traced the roof outline from overhead photos, but the roof angles have added extra corners that don't exist in the building outline. The building outlines should be more "rectangular" to match the blueprint of the building. Please see the guidance here with respect to "double pitched roof": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling#Typical_errors_in_the_interpretation_of_roof_geometry_from_aerial_images
Also, the iD editor can help automatically make objects more rectangular by pressing the Q button while editing an object.
BR_pebble (2025-02-14 08:30:42+00:00): Hello Kingsley AMANKWE
 Thank you for mapping!
 I restored a deleted building way 1315053677
 Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
 Happy Mapping!
Gorger (2025-02-19 03:53:02+00:00): "Hello Kingsley AMANKWE
 Thank you for mapping!
 I restored a deleted building way 1315047107
 Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
 Happy Mapping!"
Friendly_Ghost (2024-06-16 18:37:24+00:00): Hi voschix, I was just mapping in the same area and ran into some conflicts, because apparently we were mapping the same things at the same time. I also had to undo my wastewater plant and recycling centre because you beat me to it.

There's nothing to worry about, I'm just noting this happy coincidence.

Happy mapping!
streckenkundler (2024-06-16 19:54:53+00:00): Good evening,

please contact the DWG urgently beforehand! The removal of vandalism must be controlled and centralised.
Thank you very much!

See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/update-13-06-2024-neue-vandalismuswelle-strassen-kreuz-und-quer-teilweise-namen-geandert/113287/6

streckenkundler
ManuelB701 (2024-06-16 20:00:00+00:00): Ich bin ziemlich sicher, dass FluffyTails15 einer diesen Sockenpuppen handelt (gerade eben registriert, bearbeitete vandalierte Sachen) und hatte dem Problem eigentlich nicht beigetragen (das macht "Removed wrong tags on vandalism" eben mehrdeutig).
klfb75gxiy21tjrh (2024-06-16 20:54:28+00:00): He ajustado la dirección del camino a la dirección correcta https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152773065
pantufla (2024-10-25 09:04:55+00:00): Hello, ok, I was trying to correct this but now I don't know what we should do. Maybe we can open a discussion?
BR_pebble (2025-02-14 08:30:06+00:00): Hello Kingsley AMANKWE
 Thank you for mapping!
 I restored a deleted building way 1315052959
 Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
 Happy Mapping!
user_177389 (2024-06-16 18:09:45+00:00): Was sollte das denn?
user_177389 (2024-06-16 18:11:32+00:00): Was sollte das denn?
bdentremont (2024-06-16 19:24:53+00:00): Looks good to me!  I'm marking the note on this issue resolved.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4294467
Metzor (2024-06-16 20:08:52+00:00): Hallo Fabian!

Schön, dass du den Nudelladen von einem Supermarkt in ein Nudelgeschäft geändert hast. Danke!

Die eingetragene Website finde ich falsch. Auf der Webseite vom Nudelladen würde ich z.B. Öffnungszeiten vom Laden erwarten. Wie würdest du es finden, wenn wir diese Seite verlinken?
https://nudelladen.biodeliver.de/page/7/kontakt

Zusätzlich könnte man noch als weitere Eigenschaft eintragen:
operator:website = https://www.skid-ggmbh.de/

Viele Grüße
Metzor
Fabian007 (2024-06-19 18:49:09+00:00): Hallo Metzor,

Vielen Dank, für deine Nachricht!

Ich werde es aus verbessern.

Ich melde mich gleich wieder, sobald ich es aus verbessert habe!
Fabian007 (2024-06-19 19:24:02+00:00): Hallo Metzor,

Ich habe die Fehler korrigiert.

Ich habe auch die Webseite, die du mir geschickt hattest, auch mit verlinkt, und der alten Webseite heraus getan.

Falls das falsch sein sollte, bitte um Rückantwort!

Ich wünsche dir einen schönen Abend noch!

MFG Fabianbuecheler
puma515 (2024-06-16 19:02:14+00:00): vandalis muss wurde revertet https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152773770
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-17 06:59:50+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/152773770
BR_pebble (2025-02-14 08:31:02+00:00): Hello Kingsley AMANKWE
 Thank you for mapping!
 I restored a deleted building way 1315056128
 Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
 Happy Mapping!
PierZen (2024-06-16 19:40:15+00:00): Lors de l'import des adresses, ne pas oublier d'enlever à chaque ligne et noeud source=NRCan...   qui va plutôt comme ci-haut dans les attributs du changeset.  Les données RNCan proviennent de Adresse-Qc. L'ajout de la couche wms Adresse-Qc avec données plus récentes aide à valider les adresses wms:https://servicescarto.mern.gouv.qc.ca:443/pes/services/Territoire/AQ_ADRESSES_WMS/MapServer/WmsServer?FORMAT=image/png&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&VERSION=1.3.0&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=Adresses&STYLES=&CRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}&BBOX={bbox}
Spearfish7424 (2024-06-16 20:23:20+00:00): Bien entendu, et merci pour l'outil de validation.

Uniquement pour les cas d'importation d'adresses CanVec, je laisse la source sur chaque élément, même si elle est redondante, car je suppose qu’elle est attendue.
gscholz (2024-06-19 10:26:38+00:00): Hi overflorian,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=0.65297&lat=44.03324&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=152773132

It also has more or less destroyed the farmland relation 3591443:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3591443

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
overflorian (2024-06-19 19:23:32+00:00): Hi, thank you for your feedback. I've been dealing with some mega-polygon like this one for days, trying to narrow them down into pieces. That's still a work in progress. So that's understandable that I have made mistakes. For that, I apologise. I've fixed the issues for now (cf. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152911604), and will continue to work on this relation in the upcoming days.
Thanks for your vigilance, regards
Nearby0051 (2024-06-16 19:00:18+00:00): Vollständig rückgängig gemacht

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152773757
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-17 07:00:29+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/152773757
Leo Slager (2024-06-16 22:47:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-06-16 22:50:54+00:00): review:
leisure=park op een node kan helaas niet. Dat wordt als fout aangemerkt.
Een park is een uitgestrekt gebied met waterpartijen, bossages, grasland, etc etc.
Dat is dus afgeleid van de Engelse definitie.
Nearby0051 (2024-06-16 19:02:10+00:00): Vollständig rückgängig gemacht

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152773816
Nearby0051 (2024-06-16 18:59:08+00:00): Vollständig rückgängig gemacht

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152773697
Leo Slager (2024-06-16 22:59:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
MatchaHatesGoogle (2024-06-16 19:27:09+00:00): Keysmash typo, meant "Removed assumed oneway=no". Accidentally hit enter while typing and sent it like that.
Leo Slager (2024-06-16 23:14:08+00:00): Wat is de bron van deze melding ?
In Melvin wordt de brug nog aangegeven als zijnde geblokkerrd.
Leo Slager (2024-06-16 23:14:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
freds1954 (2024-06-17 14:56:37+00:00): Beste Leo, 
Ik was inderdaad te snel met mijn reactie en had ondertussen de verandering alweer terug gedraaid (ook al was dat niet nodig blijkt nu ;) ). 

Ik was enigszins in de war gebracht omdat ik geen datum kenmerk kon vinden en deze calamiteit in verband bracht met die die in mei was opgelost en geen weet had van deze van 6 juni.
 
Kan de datum 6 juni 2024 toegevoegd worden aan de tekst of misschien als startdatum worden opgenomen?

Met excuses voor het ongemak en bedankt voor je reactie.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Fred Schutte
Leo Slager (2024-06-17 18:42:05+00:00): Dag Fred,
Die datum heb je zelf al toegevoegd aan de brug door het aanpassen van de note=.....
Layft Greater (2024-11-08 08:20:39+00:00): Please add junction key for roundabouts. Is it a roundabout or just a circular junction?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 18:09:34+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11986035085/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of shop is here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting?
Leo Slager (2024-06-16 23:17:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
CeskoBara (2024-08-10 10:52:46+00:00): Ciao, dove hai trovato il toponimo 'Mandra', sengnato come località Mandra vicino alle Casare Asnicar?
Henri97 (2024-06-25 07:13:36+00:00): Hallo MariusEbe,
danke für das hinzufügen von Fußwegen. Mir ist aufgefallen, dass an den Straßen, an denen du parallele Gehwege hinzufügst, teils als sidewalk schon der Gehweg gemappt wurde. Beispiel, die Andre-Pican Straße, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23448397
Dies sollte IMHO dann auch geändert werden.
NeisBot (2024-06-16 20:30:24+00:00): Hi Thierry MGTX, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1292927165

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
Thierry MGTX (2024-06-16 20:46:17+00:00): The source is one of the authorised aerial views for mapping.
This beach is an artificial one, adjacent to / belonging to the lake "plan d'eau de Ligny".
If there's a better way to map it, please let me know (I've read the Wiki OSM page about beaches but I still don't know).
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-17 06:10:01+00:00): Thank you for your reply.
Looks good!

#HappyMapping
Jordi MF (2024-06-16 21:15:05+00:00): 

Hola,

¿Podrías indicar la fuente en que se explicite que Daimuz es una forma actual usada por los castellanohablantes para nombrar el pueblo de Daimús?
lrmmm (2024-06-16 22:43:34+00:00): Buenas,

Se puede comprobar el uso del nombre en diversos restaurantes del municio. También se puede comprobar su amplio uso en Google Trends asi como en la Línea de Bus de Avanza que une la Playa de Daimuz con Madrid. Igualmente en el histórico del INE se detalla que este era su nombre oficial hasta el cambio a la versión en Valenciano de dicho topónimo.
Jordi MF (2024-06-17 05:24:46+00:00): Hola,

La RAE recomienda no usar los nombres que hayan caído en desuso, por eso, el histórico, del INE no creo que sea una buena fuente. Gracias por informar sobre la línea de bus y responder.

Un saludo
Jordi MF (2024-06-16 21:13:32+00:00): Hola,

¿Podrías indicar la fuente en que se explicite que Daimuz es una forma actual usada por los castellanohablantes para nombrar el pueblo de Daimús?
Jordi MF (2024-06-16 21:16:05+00:00): Perdón, me refería al nombre de "Puebla de Farnals" para referirse a la Pobla de Farnals. La Puebla de Farnals es un uso obsoleto entre la población castellanohablante y solamant aparece en la Wikipedia. La licencia de uso de Wikipedia es incompatible con la de OpenStreetMap.
lrmmm (2024-06-17 07:33:26+00:00): Buenas,
El uso del topónimo Puebla de Farnals en la actualidad se puede comprobar en diversos negocios de la zona. Igualmente ni en Google Trends ni en Twitter se aprecia un desuso de esta versión. Existen en la provincia varios municipios con calles que en su versión en español usan el topónimo Puebla de Farnals. Como referencia del topónimo: "Diccionario de topónimos españoles y sus gentilicios (Celdrán Gomáriz, Pancracio)"
Jordi MF (2024-06-17 16:38:23+00:00): Sobre el uso de Google Trends, tampoco tengo clara su utilidad ya que no muestra el número absoluto de búsquedas. Según Google:

"Las cifras del gráfico no representan el volumen absoluto de búsquedas, porque los datos se normalizan y se presentan en una escala de 0 a 100, en la que cada punto del gráfico se divide por el punto mayor, o 100. Los números junto a los términos de búsqueda en la parte superior del gráfico son resúmenes o totales.

Una línea que tiende a descender implica que la popularidad relativa de un término de búsqueda está bajando; pero no necesariamente supone que el número total de búsquedas de este término o palabra haya bajado, más bien que su popularidad en comparación con otras búsquedas está disminuyendo".

Pot otra parte, he consultado el libro Diccionario que mencionas ya que también lo tengo y acepta, por igual, el término 'la Pobla de Vallbona', 'Pobla de Vallbona' y 'La Puebla de Vallbona'.

Me parece un tema interesante por discutir.

Saludos
lrmmm (2024-06-17 18:12:45+00:00): Hola, 
Efectivamente en Trenes se muestran normalizados los datos, pero permite añadir más de un elemento a la comparativa, así ambos tienen la misma referencia. El objetivo de usar Trends y Redes sociales es justificar que no se trata de un topónimo en desuso. Otra forma de medir su aceptación que acabo de comprobar es, ya que es un lugar muy turístico, revisar que topónimo usan los anunciantes de alquileres. He encontrado que se usan ambos topónimos. Lo que sí me ha resultado claro es que en no se refieren al barrio Platja de Farnals usando Platja si no Playa.
dadavid (2024-06-17 09:12:03+00:00): Hi dituzuo, 

danke für deine Bearbeitungen :) 
du hattest hier [1] an dem Haus in der Panoramastraße 41 den name=Pano41 eingetragen. 

Ist das wirklich der Name dieses Hauses? Ich habe dazu im Internet nichts gefunden und soweit ich das sehe steht auch außen an dem Haus dieser Name nicht drauf. Schau gern nochmal ins OSM Wiki, was unter "name" eingetragen werden sollte [2]. 

Ich habe den Namen vorest entfernt, weil ich vermute, dass es sich um einen Tippfehler handelt :) Melde dich gern, falls das doch der richtige Name sein sollte, dann mache ich das gern rückgängig. 

Viele Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen :) 

David

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92409410/history

[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name
marc__marc (2026-02-12 21:30:03+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1292932780
n'hésites pas à ajouter un noeud commun entre la traversée piétonne et la route
divaddivag (2024-06-17 15:47:07+00:00): Salut Nathan, t'es sur pour https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9994549911? Je ne suis pas un pro dans le domaine mais cela ressemble à cela: https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/#background=streets&focus=pic&map=17.74/49.175204/-0.625323&pic=28889ca7-3623-4d31-9f00-653fbbc5288a
NathanBnm (2024-06-17 16:12:09+00:00): Effectivement bien vu c'est une erreur. Comme je ne voyais rien sur la vue aérienne j'ai cru qu'il y avait un doublon avec la borne de recharge située juste à côté. Pour autant je vais vérifier la documentation car c'est pas vraiment une borne de recharge car c'est sous forme de casiers.

Pour info :
https://www.ouest-france.fr/normandie/tilly-sur-seulles-14250/tilly-sur-seulles-inaugure-la-premiere-station-de-recharge-pour-velos-electriques-du-calvados-0c9c04c2-6308-11ec-908f-7a1b634a4182

Je vais faire les corrections merci pour ta réactivité
NathanBnm (2024-06-18 09:02:48+00:00): @divaddivag j'ai fait les corrections et j'ai ajouté également la même chose à Luc-sur-Mer (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11989756753 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11989756754)

Source ici : https://www.ouest-france.fr/normandie/luc-sur-mer-14530/une-station-de-recharge-de-velos-electriques-installee-a-luc-sur-mer-26650fa4-8b69-11ed-88f4-089e4f8ff0bd
divaddivag (2024-06-18 11:16:10+00:00): Merci pour le rajout. J'en avais mappé une autre à son installation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10004208008 ou https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/#background=streets&focus=pic&map=19.31/49.3428017/-0.6918991&pic=4ede28c0-7e9a-4821-98c1-c178c5a82b96&speed=250&xyz=275.00/0.00/30

Par contre, j'ai des réserves sur les name , place le mairie n'existe pas à Tilly.À basculer en official_name, comme pour les container à déchets: https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/borne-de-compostage/11108/54 ?
Vivek Dumre (2024-06-17 15:53:24+00:00): Good Mapping with a comment.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152777647
700RPB (2024-06-16 22:06:25+00:00): from survey too
mcliquid (2024-06-17 09:03:56+00:00): Nach meinem Verständnis darf das Geodatenportal der Stadt Friedrichshafen nicht für OSM genutzt werden: https://www.gisserver.de/friedrichshafen/Impressum_WEBGIS.html
Siehe Punkt "Copyright".
rene78 (2024-06-17 11:29:56+00:00): Ja, leider. Habe es nur benutzt, um eine grobe Idee für die Lage von Grasflächen und Bänken zu bekommen.

Hoffentlich sind die Daten eines Tages für OSM nutzbar. Diese Befliegungen für die Aufnahmen werden immerhin von Steuergeldern finanziert.
Pathumthani (2024-07-31 05:58:11+00:00): Tolle Korrektur der Linie 620. Leider Quelle VEJ (https://www.vej-bus.de/fileadmin/Unterseiten/Fahrplaene/Linie_620_WEB__g%C3%BCltig_ab_01.02.2024.pdf) immer noch auf dem alten Stand! Kannst Du bitte Deine Quelle hinzufügen!?
dypa (2024-06-17 15:10:25+00:00): Здравствуйте, почему скамейка https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11341846522 не является произведением исскуства по вашему мнению? Кованная, имеет уникальную надпись, а раньше на спинке был ангел (отломан, эх).
vonrockos (2024-06-17 17:01:48+00:00): Добрый день! С ангелом возможно эта скамейка на artwork бы и потянула. А сейчас просто кованная скамейка с надписью. Например, каждая скамейка на Тройной липовой аллее большее произведение искусства (Карл Росси, как никак), но это не повод их все обозначать как artwork.
dypa (2024-06-17 18:54:40+00:00): Спасибо за аргументированный ответ. 

Приведу тоже свои аргументы:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:tourism%3Dartwork не описывает значимость объекта, поэтому объект с именитым автором и без автора и неопределенной художественной ценностью будут равноценны

- утеря части произведения искусства случается, но это не является причиной говорить о полной утрате свойств объекта. Не буду приводить в пример руины, а вот музыкальный вокзал вообще нарушает принцип https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ground_truth и должен быть удален

Но я точно согласен с вами, что сложно определить что является произведением искусства в современном мире. Пусть будет просто скамейка, возможно со временем к ней добавиться тег historic или будет проведена реставрация :)
vonrockos (2024-06-17 20:40:08+00:00): Если вы уверены, то я не возражаю против восстановления artwork в данном случае. В конце концов, я же не видел эту скамейку, когда на ней был ангел, и фоток не нашел...
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-23 09:42:04+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11986222144/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 15:52:34+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11986328255/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop?
John Gilmore (2025-04-01 15:43:41+00:00): https://www.modern-age.com/p/upper-east-side
It's an IV infusion clinic.
ZLima12 (2024-06-30 23:07:29+00:00): Hi,

Generally speaking, paint alone doesn't warrant the use of a second way. Usually a physical barrier is required for this. If there's only paint but there is a turn restriction, this should most likely be mapped as a single way with a turn restriction relation.
ZLima12 (2024-06-30 23:36:16+00:00): After taking a closer look, this road was already accurate before this changeset, since it was tagged with change:forward=no or change:lanes:forward=yes|not_right|no. As such, I've had to revert this changeset. I retained your classification change (motorway_link -> motorway) since that looks reasonable.
Erelen (2024-06-16 23:18:51+00:00): [out:json];
node[name=Meridianbet](user:"Kladionica Meridian") -> .a;
foreach.a(
  ._ is_in -> .b;
  nwr.b[building] -> .b_in;
  way(around:20)[building] -> .b_around;
  if (b_in.count(wr) == 0 && b_around.count(nwr) > 0) {
    ._;
    out;
  }
);
fititnt (2024-06-24 16:20:34+00:00): Hello @MishellCatucuamba.

Is the deletion of amenity=clinic (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7020687057/history) a mistake? 

If not, please mention, otherwise I will restore the node.

Thanks!
MishellCatucuamba (2024-07-17 14:40:45+00:00): Hi, I'll check it now.
CurlingMan13 (2024-06-17 02:53:53+00:00): Building still exists and should not be deleted.  just the business.

Changeset reverted.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-17 00:30:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11986490795
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/415491509

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Robin Zyx (2024-06-17 07:08:21+00:00): Is there an extra "no" in that description?

Agree that W103 is a mess on the block btw Broadway and WEA. I expect it will stay that way until the renovation project on the north side of the street is done, which... next year?
IraGersh (2024-06-17 13:55:03+00:00): Actually, its fine the way it is.   I thought I had said no no somewhere but I didn't.

There is no tactile paving there and the street is needs repaving.  Once tactile paving goes in DOT doesn't like to do change to raised crosswalks.  The fact that this cross street has no tactile paving and needs repaving means that a raised crosswalk is possible.  I like to use the term continuous sidewalk.  I heard that term used somewhere else and its sounds positive whereas raised crosswalks implies a mod.
StreetSurveyor (2024-08-08 01:31:40+00:00): There was a total of seven named service roads here. Not sure if you really conducted a thorough survey.