piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2026-06-06 10:08:02+00:00): Hello. John.
A question. Don't you use the mapathoner plugin to find and square unsquared buildings ?
Could square appr 75 buildings.
Best regards
JohnW11 (2026-06-06 11:03:16+00:00): Will be more careful in future
Haritron (2026-06-10 18:01:01+00:00): Hello Ctrl+ShiftF5,

I noticed several roads (Example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175230926 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293777281, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/564540762, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/580986419 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1173607520), were recently upgraded to primary classification. Based on the OSM Wiki definition of highway=primary (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary), these roads typically function as major through-routes connecting larger population centers or forming part of a broader network. From my review of the area, these roads appear to carry relatively low traffic volumes and do not seem to serve as connections to major populated destinations. 

There are also a few other examples of over classified secondaries in the area that may be worth reviewing. For example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1302162303 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1527698850 seem more appropriate as residential as they appear to primarily provide access to local housing (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway). 

In addition, some geometry changes suggest a continuous bidirectional road may have been split into separate segments (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1527345368). Based on Bing and Esri aerial imagery, this appears to be a single undivided road, and the current structure may introduce a routing break near  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1527345369.

I was wondering if you might have local knowledge, official road classifications, or other resources that informed these edits. Otherwise, would you be open to me reviewing and updating the classifications and geometry in the area to better reflect the current road network and align with OSM tagging guidelines?

Best regards,
Haritron
trial (2026-06-10 11:01:41+00:00): Better tagging, but a place=locality on top of that would make sense, wouldn't it? It's still the name of the place, isn't it?
aseigo (2026-06-10 11:48:52+00:00): It's an abandoned village, so the  specific tag (recommended for place=locality) would be "village". It's abandoned, so I added the lifecycle tag to note that.

The name is still there ("Chaatl"), of course. Some of the other  abandoned villages I added in this and adjacent changesets have geographic features (e.g. bays or other waterways) that share their name, and those are indeed noted.

I *think* that `abandoned:place=village` is the correct tag here?
trial (2026-06-10 11:59:34+00:00): As said in the wiki: The place=locality tag is used to name an unpopulated location, which is the case.
`abandoned:place=village` +`place=locality` is correct.
The first (only) would mean the name Chaatl is not used anymore for this place.
aseigo (2026-06-10 12:23:28+00:00): See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned:place

It specifically calls this out: "Many such features are currently tagged place=locality, especially in the United States where many GNIS features were imported as place=locality. However, place=locality is a much less specific tag, used for many other features, including places that were never populated."
trial (2026-06-10 12:38:26+00:00): That bad practice exist(ed) in US doesn't prevent to use it where it makes sense (like here, a place, not a cape, a river, etc..., which is inhabited).
Using place=locality on "top" of `abandoned:place=village` is NOT discouraged.
aseigo (2026-06-10 12:44:05+00:00): Can you provide an example where `place=locality` exists alongside a more specific `place=` tag?

I'm also not sure what adding `place=locality` would improve here. The name is still there, it is accurately mapped as an abandoned village.

Is your concern that it doesn't show up on the default renderer?

> That bad practice exist(ed) in US

That article says "especially in", not that it was specifically in the US, nor is that the issue it is highlighting. The point that article appears to be making is that `place=locality` is not specific, with  e.g. `abandon:place=village` being preferred.
aseigo (2026-06-10 12:51:24+00:00): A further suggestion: these *could* be tagged with `historic=ruins` 

I don't *think* this (and most others) can be marked as `heritage=` as they mostly aren't actively marked as suck by one of the Canadian heritage orgs, or included in the sites maintained by  Haida Gwaii Watchmen? If there is a link to a heritage org/program, though, then that tag could also be added.
trial (2026-06-10 13:04:10+00:00): historic=ruins makes sense only if something visible remains. I've no idea if it's the case.
For place=locality, to some extend it could be seen as tagging for the renderer. But on the other hand, it's a place, not only an abandoned village (that could be now something else like an industrial area), see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=locality#Don't_use_place=locality_just_to_force_a_name_to_appear_on_a_feature.
aseigo (2026-06-10 13:11:42+00:00): > But on the other hand, it's a place, not only an abandoned village

A `place=village` a place, though? 

Life-cycle tags don't change the semantics of that, afaik?

> But on the other hand, it's a place, not only an abandoned village

I disagree here. It's specifically the name of a village that is now abandoned. There is nothing else there, and if there is in future that place can be added.

> place=locality#Don't_use_place=locality_just_to_force_a_name_to_appear_on_a_feature.

Doesn't that support the current tagging? If we want this to show on the default renderer, we should figure out a tagging combination that makes sense and is accurate to the reality of it being an abandoned village site, but which openstreetmap.org can show.
残阳逐流 (2026-06-10 07:24:28+00:00): 公交线路建议按照OSMwiki中的PTv2标准绘制，并在关系中带上public_transport:version=2的标签
MoistTangerine2 (2026-06-10 12:45:03+00:00): 谢谢，我稍后添加。
Thanks, I'll add it later.
PizzaTreeIsland (2026-06-06 11:36:13+00:00): The same issue as in changeset 183732921 with mixed up node and way ids also happened here. I fixed it. Please make sure your app handles way IDs properly.
PizzaTreeIsland (2026-06-06 11:26:15+00:00): Hello, 
It seems like there is an issue with your editor. Osm counts up ids for nodes and ways separately. You tried to edit way 115767704, which is the church in denmark, but you actually added the tags to node  115767704, which happens to be a random node of a street in Lousiana, Usa. 
As far as I can see, the tags you added were all already on the church, too, so I just removed them from the wrong street node. 
It would be great if you could further investigate how it came to this mixup (programming mistake vs user error for instance) to understand how to avoid it. A lot of newer editors are vibecoded and have this very mixup problem, unfortunately. 

Thanks and happy mapping! 
(An other) Jonas
Jonas Hansen (2026-06-07 07:20:12+00:00): Thanks for catching this and for cleaning up node 115767704, and sorry for the
bad edit.
You diagnosed it exactly right: it was a programming bug on our side, not user
error. Our Citypedia editor let me suggest an edit to the church, but internally
it kept only the bare numeric OSM id and dropped whether it was a node, way or
relation. When it pushed the edit it asked the API for both the node and the way
with that number and preferred the node when one existed — so the edit meant for
way/115767704 (Enghave Kirke) was written to node/115767704, which happens to be
that old TIGER street node in Louisiana. Our search data is a Denmark-only
extract where 115767704 exists only as the church, so the collision never
surfaced in our own testing — it only appears against the global API.
It's now fixed: the editor carries the element type with the id end-to-end and
addresses node/way/relation explicitly, and it refuses to touch an element whose
type it can't confirm rather than guessing. I've verified against the live API
that requesting 115767704 now resolves to Enghave Kirke as a way, not the
Louisiana node.
Thanks again for the careful and friendly report — exactly the nudge that was
needed. Happy mapping!
literan (2026-06-07 13:52:41+00:00): зачем это здесь?
Frame&Focus (2026-06-06 11:12:43+00:00): This removed the rename in #179841761 for National Ave South
Cotep4 (2026-06-06 13:10:28+00:00): Oi, pamiršau vėl pridėti žymę „landcover“ prie šių vietovių. Ačiū, kad tai ištaisėte!
Tomas Straupis (2026-06-06 14:18:23+00:00): Jokių problemų, sėkmės!
aceman444 (2026-06-07 13:48:23+00:00): Toto ale nie je pravda. Tento polygon pokryva celu Bratislavu, ale su tam rozne typy landuse, ktore treba zakreslit. 
Okrem toho na niektorych plochach uz je landuse zakresleny a teraz sa teda prekryvaju, co je nezmysel.
Pokial viem tato relacia sa cela mala upratat, pripadne aj vymazat.
Fjana (2026-06-07 15:46:38+00:00): Ok, tak to jsem špatně pochopil, co se mělo udělat. Osobně jsem tedy za smazání, sám to ale dělat radši nebudu, protože moc dobře neumím revertovat data.
aceman444 (2026-06-07 19:54:47+00:00): O pridavani landuse=residential sa nikdy nehovorilo, tak neviem co ste nespravne pochopili. Ale v kazdom pripade je to vecne nespravne, kedze v tejto oblasti su aj ine landuse a prekryv nie je ziaduci.
FajrAl (2026-06-06 12:00:26+00:00): Menambahkan batas administrasi harus disertai sumber data
PizzaTreeIsland (2026-06-06 11:59:28+00:00): The node and way id mixup also occured here. Please fix it before editing anything else on osm with that app
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-07 06:11:29+00:00): #spam
Jakka (2026-06-13 16:47:32+00:00): Je n'ai rien trouver pour confirmer votre ajouts.
Dadao34 (2026-06-15 06:46:59+00:00): Effectivement il n'a pas l' aire référencé mais l'endroit est magnifique
Szymson (2026-06-25 04:54:47+00:00): Mostek już otwarty po remoncie
Andrea Musuruane (2026-06-07 08:35:12+00:00): Ciao. Avresti dovuto togliere solo i prefissi destroyed. Il tagging attuale non identifica nulla :-(
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183736228
MarcoR (2026-06-06 19:48:30+00:00): Ciao e benvenuti su OpenStreetMap!

Ho migliorato alcuni dettagli (le maiuscole e il formato del numero di telefono).

Se l'attività non fornisce posti letto per i propri ospiti non andrebbe mappata come tourism=alpine_hut (vedi la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=alpine_hut). Inoltre il numero di telefono che avete inserito qua e quello nel profilo Instagram sono diversi.

Buon mapping,
Marco
ntzm (2026-06-09 10:53:31+00:00): Hi, this change broke the oneway direction of this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1526730819
I have fixed it
user_10901495 (2026-06-09 11:23:11+00:00): Thanks
NieWnen (2026-06-06 14:24:42+00:00): Proszę zaprzestań wprowadzania nieprawidłowych zmian.

Przystanek jest już dodany i otagowany jako nieużywany.

Należy podawać źródła wprowadzonej zmiany.
NieWnen (2026-06-06 14:29:37+00:00): Jak droga jest w budowie to przystanki są używane?
silversurfer83 (2026-06-06 19:08:53+00:00): Hi there :)

please observe the following guidelines set forth in our wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history


happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183737105
MrLocalFixer (2026-06-07 03:51:53+00:00): Sorry, I was unaware of this rule. I will keep it in mind next time. Thank you very much for the tip.
nullroute (2026-06-06 13:13:08+00:00): This was done because the building has a name which is separate from the name of the amenity=clinic feature.
Pavel_Š (2026-06-07 09:53:33+00:00): Dobrý den, touto sadou změn jste rozbil všechny linky MHD, které mají zastávku Řípská. Opravíte to prosím do původního (správného) stavu. Nyní mají vašem zásahu všechny linky MHD Zastávku Řípská jako poslední položku. Nevím, jak se vám to povedlo, ale trasy jste tím rozbil https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=16.69143&lat=49.17667&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
Pavel_Š (2026-06-07 09:57:05+00:00): Bezpečnou úpravou je vždy!!! Zastávkové uzly odpojit od staré way a po vytvoření nové cesty zastávkové uzly opět připojit. Když je natvrdo vymažete a pak vytváříte znovu, musíte je ve všech relacích ročně dosadit na správné místo. A to je otrava a taky dost chybové. Co s tím teď?  Já bych Vám tu sadu změn nejraději vrátil zpět..
Leo Slager (2026-06-07 12:31:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2026-06-07 12:41:08+00:00): Hallo Marcel,

Een goede eerste poging.

Er zijn echter zoveel regeltjes in de wiki dat een foute is snel gemaakt.
Dat is helemaal niet erg, al doende leert men !

shop=vacant
checkdate=2026-06-06
is de juiste manier van taggen.

Pas je het zelf aan ?
Leo Slager (2026-06-07 12:43:18+00:00): Dan mogen ook alle tags van de bank verwijderd worden.

ik pas het even aan.
Cavedagna (2026-06-19 16:04:44+00:00): Questo toponimo è ancora in uso? Pensavo conservasse un valore esclusivamente storico.
WinstonSmith (2026-06-20 14:16:54+00:00): Concordo, preferirei anch'io marcarlo come toponimo passato (per quanto di uso recente). Ma qual è il tag corretto?
Cavedagna (2026-06-21 22:38:55+00:00): Per "Due pozzi" in Bolognina (Nodo: 12536653950) avevo messo solamente "old_name".
WinstonSmith (2026-06-22 09:43:01+00:00): Grazie, ottima idea. Lo inserisco subito anche qui!
test0022012 (2026-06-07 09:22:49+00:00): أيها المغربي  أيها المغربي  Oh Moroccan Oh Moroccan ....
أولا :نعتمد على العربية لأنها لغة و طنية و الانجليزية لأنها لغة عالمية لا اكثر و لا أقل و لا داعي للتحجر الفكري و الفتنة لان الموقع عالمي و لا يخص الجزائر فقط ...

ثانيا : لم يُفصل بعد بشكل رسمي في الحرف القياسي لكتابة اللغة الأمازيغية في الجزائر؛ حيث يعكف المجمع الجزائري للغة الأمازيغية على دراسة هذا الملف وتحديد الخيارات الأنسب، تماشيًا مع المادة الرابعة من الدستور التي تمنح الأمازيغية مكانتها كلغة وطنية ورسمية.

ثالثا : وتُعرف هذه الحروف باسم 'التيفيناغ'، وهو خط جرى اعتماده وتطويره مطلع القرن الحادي والعشرين من قِبل 'المعهد الملكي للثقافة الأمازيغية' (IRCAM) في المملكة المغربية في الرباط بالمملكة المغربية وتأسس بظهير ملكي مغربي عام 2001 و مدعم من طرف فرنسا ،. ومع ذلك، يثير استخدام هذا الحرف نقاشاً واسعاً وسجالاً سياسياً وثقافياً داخل الجزائر، لا سيما من طرف التيارات الرافضة له، والتي تربطه أحياناً بأجندات سياسية أو بحركات انفصالية مثل حركة 'الماك' المصنفة كمنظمة إرهابية في البلاد تحت إمرة الارهابي فرحات مهني ....

رابعا: الجزائر و المغرب ليس خاوة خاوة في الوقت الراهن اذا كنت مغربيا الا من رحم الله فالمغرب مدعات للفتنة و التفرقة و الجزائر الحمد لله حرة بفضل الله و الرجال الذين سخرهم الله لذلك و تلك الاراضي جزائرية من القالة الى مرسى بن مھيدي و من الجزائر الى عين قزام و لا ننسى بشار و تيندوف و غار جبيلات اراضي جزائرية و الحمد لله .

خامسا: وفي هذا السياق، نستعرض المواد 1، 2، 3، و4 من الدستور الجزائري التي تحدد الثوابت الهوياتية للدولة:
الفصل الأول : الجزائر

المادة 1: الجزائر جمهورية ديمقراطية شعبية، وهي وحدة لا تتجزأ.

المادة 2 : الإســلام ديـــن الدّولـــة.

المادة 3 : اللّغة العربيّة هي اللّغة الوطنيّة والرّسميّة. تظل العربيّة اللّغة الرسميّة للدّولة. يُحدث لدى رئيس الجمهورية مجلس أعلى للّغة العربيّة. يكلف المجلس الأعلى للّغة العربيّة على الخصوص بالعمل على ازدهار اللّغة العربيّة وتعميم استعمالها في الميادين العلميّة والتكنولوجيّة والتشجيع على التّرجمة إليها لهذه الغاية.

المادة 4 : تمازيغت هي كذلك لغة وطنيّة ورسميّة. تعمل الدّولة لترقيتها وتطويرها بكل تنوّعاتها اللّسانيّة المستعملة عبر التراب الوطني. يُحدث مَجمع جزائري للغة تمازيغت يوضع لدى رئيس الجمهورية. يستند المجمع إلى أشغال الخبراء، ويكلّف بتوفير الشروط اللاّزمة لترقية تمازيغت قصد تجسيد وضعها كلغة رسميّة فيما بعد. تحدّد كيفيّات تطبيق هذه المادّة بموجب قانون عضوي.
Amguid (2026-06-07 13:04:25+00:00): يا البهلول ، يا مهرج، بدل ما تصلّح الأخطاء راك غير تزيد تعقّد الأمور وتخلق مشاكل أكثر. ماكانش داعي تكتب نصوص طويلة باش تبرّر تصرفاتك
تمازيغت راهي في دارها فوق أرض تامازغا؛ مايش مجرد لغة، راهي نبض هاد الأرض وجذور التاريخ. تمازيغت لغة وطنية ورسمية، وعمرها ما كانت تسحق تبرير ولا رافدة يدها وتستنى في كاش اعتراف من برّا. شرعيتها جابتها بذراعها، بدم وتضحيات ولادها الشرفاء. من قمام جرجرة الشامخة حتى للأوراس الأشم، وفي كل شبر من هاد البلاد، قاوموا الرجال وحكموا فيها جيل بعد جيل، باش تقعد اليوم لغة حرة، حية، وراسخة في ساسها، وشاهدة على تاريخ ما يموتش.
test0022012 (2026-06-07 16:38:26+00:00): https://www.facebook.com/reel/1755132125852311
ilias_ (2026-06-08 17:37:56+00:00): You're showing us your incredible intelligence, test0022012. See this discussion about you

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/names-in-algeria/127362/44
frostttt (2026-06-06 13:25:28+00:00): woah gas station
TheSwavu (2026-06-07 11:21:26+00:00): Changesets:

183755260,183743183,183742964

... (another 43 changesets) ...

183738703,183738645,183738521 

have been reverted.

There was nothing about the Sydney boundary that needed fixing and these changesets broke a number of admin boundaries.
sauce1984 (2026-06-06 13:46:24+00:00): danke, kurze Frage zum name tag: auf der Website sehe ich gerade ist die Eigenschreibweise in Kleinbuchstaben und zusammengeschrieben 'johannatorten', sollte das dann auch in osm so übernommen werden?
Leo Slager (2026-06-07 12:45:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
synthfi (2026-06-06 20:50:31+00:00): this was updating number of floors with comaps
Joseph R P (2026-06-18 22:19:11+00:00): You may be conflating the motorway criteria with trunk road criteria. Trunk roads must form a coherent network of long haul routes, while controlled-access highways, isolated or not, may be tagged as a motorways regardless of their importance as the tag revolves around physical characteristics rather than role in the system. The OSM Wiki, regarding motorways, states "In general, a disconnected motorway should have multiple grade-separated, controlled access interchanges over a significant distance, generally at least 2-10 miles, in order to be tagged as a motorway island." The Hot Springs Bypass and the controlled-access section of Grand Avenue to meet these criteria.
CoryS89 (2026-06-18 22:43:41+00:00): Hello, I was going by what I read on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance#Motorway which states that it has been adopted by US mappers and that requirement for a motorway must meet ALL of these requirements "Grade separation
Limited access via on/off ramps
No at-grade intersections or traffic signals (although on-ramps may have traffic control devices)
Divided carriageways
Designed and maintained to support high speeds over long distances as part of an interconnected motorway network"
The way I see it, going around a single city does not necessarily mean long haul. Also, it isn't connected to any other motorway network. However, that same page says that it should be a "motorway island" but that wasn't an option that I saw when selecting road classification. 
A lot of these classifications on OSM and the wiki seem to have very loose definitions and seems to be up to the local mappers interpretation and knowledge and I, at the time, felt I made the right call. If you'd like to change it back to motorway, I won't challenge it or change it back.
-Cory
Joseph R P (2026-06-18 22:57:23+00:00): Thank you for the reply. I agree that the on-the-map highway classification definitions are loose when compared to the OSM Wiki's definitions. I would say the motorway documentation is accurate for the most part though "as part of an interconnected motorway network" seems very Europe-centric, as in the US we have all sorts of controlled-access highways signed as Interstates, U.S. Routes, state highways, etc. which don't share one common route network or are all linked to one another. True motorways in Europe typically have those attributes.
Minh Nguyen (2026-06-18 23:04:06+00:00): “Motorway island” refers to an isolated section of highway=motorway, not a special tag of any sort. I clarified the wording in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Special:Diff/3051093
CoryS89 (2026-06-18 23:12:39+00:00): Thanks for helping clarify, Mihn.
ADAC Touristische InfoSysteme (2026-06-10 12:19:04+00:00): Hi Badojo, looks like you have a typo in  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/250447847 >> population
Badojo (2026-06-10 12:22:47+00:00): Hi, thanks for noticing!
martinst (2026-06-06 16:02:43+00:00): Node 1197207835: Macht hier access=private (je nach Beschilderung) nicht mehr Sinn?
GCWMR (2026-06-08 13:18:20+00:00): Ja, macht wahrscheinlich mehr Sinn. Habs gleich so angepasst. 
Das Schild am Gatter sagt: "Egal, was deine App sagt, das ist KEIN Wander- oder Radweg. Bitte die Straße benutzen"
martinst (2026-06-08 16:09:15+00:00): Am Node auch noch?
OlasMapy (2026-06-07 14:08:14+00:00): A coś we wiadomościach słyszałem, że niby ma być im. Donalda Trumpa.
Dawid2849 (2026-06-07 14:17:34+00:00): Może i będzie im. Donalda Trumpa, ale to tylko przypuszczenia, więc nie powinno być ich w name
Minh Nguyen (2026-06-09 19:15:21+00:00): Hi, it looks like this changeset removed the Osage name from Hominy. Perhaps this was in response to a font rendering bug in Mapnik? See the discussion in changeset 183279767. Changeset 183890744 restores the Osage name.
橘ヒカリ (2026-06-12 15:02:49+00:00): 您好，请勿根据客运口径对铁路线路的relation进行拆分操作！谢谢！
橘ヒカリ (2026-06-12 15:34:03+00:00): Reverted in 184021319
bxl-forever (2026-06-16 13:13:44+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183917800
Leo Slager (2026-06-07 12:47:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
sgtbean (2026-06-07 20:48:02+00:00): Hey Leo, ik had de mail inderdaad ontvangen, dank daarvoor! MVG, Edwin
Leo Slager (2026-06-07 12:52:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-06-07 13:43:37+00:00): SVP, arrêtez d'ajouter des projets qui n'existent pas.
Leo Slager (2026-06-07 12:58:01+00:00): review:

Het voetpad is vastgemaakt aan de grens van het nationaal park in plaats van aan de aansluitende weg.

ik pas het even aan.
zyxzyx (2026-06-08 06:43:31+00:00): This change set ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183744668#map=17/37.788649/140.417075  ) should be reverted because it is unreal editing that the Fukushima JCT would have a fictitious roundabout.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-06-11 18:01:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183983929 where the changeset comment is: Reverting what appears to be a couple of fantasy roundabouts; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183744668
SomeoneElse (2026-06-11 18:03:26+00:00): Hello WarmedCord207,
Please email data@openstreetmap.org with a subject line of "[Ticket#2026061110000811] WarmedCord207" explaining what your source for this roundabout was.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2026-06-11 18:03:45+00:00): Halo WarmedCord207,
Silakan kirim email ke data@openstreetmap.org dengan subjek "[Ticket#2026061110000811] WarmedCord207" yang menjelaskan sumber informasi Anda tentang bundaran ini.
Salam Hormat,
Andy Townsend, atas nama Kelompok Kerja Data OSM.
zyxzyx (2026-06-12 10:25:26+00:00): Hello, everyone. Thank you for your efforts.
silversurfer83 (2026-06-07 07:58:23+00:00): Moin :)

wenn du mich fragst sehen die unteren 2/3 des Weges nach einer Zufahrt für das Gebäude aus. Wenn ich korrekt liege sollte der Weg also aufgeteilt werden in service und path (footway, wenn VZ239 da steht).

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183745186
GenGap (2026-06-07 08:35:05+00:00): Hi, hast recht, danke :)