piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ilias_ (2025-12-04 19:55:25+00:00): Hi, these buildings were also already mapped so no need to add another one on top of them. There's also no need to name a bâtiment, well, "bâtiment".

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175515681
ziomio (2025-12-04 17:58:56+00:00): https://myportal-cf882-nrc-prod.apps.nrc.lepida.it/myportal/C_F882/api/content/download?id=62c498c45d698400994fd573
Kaverzin3 (2025-12-04 17:57:13+00:00): https://www.toponimika.spb.ru/vse-toponimy-spb/ofitsialnye-resheniya-o-prisvoenii-naimenovanij-obektov-na-territorii-sankt-peterburga/item/download/544_d11025dfc1c2486a307f1311b9edda07.html
ziomio (2025-12-04 17:58:04+00:00): https://myportal-cf882-nrc-prod.apps.nrc.lepida.it/myportal/C_F882/api/content/download?id=62c498c45d698400994fd573
V_Vibes (2026-01-19 08:42:56+00:00): Hi,
Happy Mapping.
Yog Sot (2025-12-04 20:00:20+00:00): Platany powinieneś dac nazwe łacińską
tutaj masz rozbudowany zestaw tagów 

dla przykładu:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12589728514
lub
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8432374370

a centralny rejestr pewno znasz:
https://geoserwis.gdos.gov.pl/mapy/?usedesktop=true
VictorIE (2025-12-07 21:21:41+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33411031/

I realise things have changed a lot in the port, but maxspeed=60 near the quayside?
wavewings (2025-12-08 07:49:00+00:00): Yeah that doesn't look right.

The road leading from Berth 1 seems to be 20km/h.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=775147994864905 , I'm not sure if that applies at the roundabout as well but it probably indicates a low speed around there.

A number of other roads around the port are 20 or 30km/h.
Yog Sot (2025-12-04 23:16:02+00:00): czemu kasujesz przejscie na linii?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-05 05:13:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456080300
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456080301

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
iandees (2025-12-04 20:05:29+00:00): Hi! Thanks for making change on the map.

If a building isn't there anymore, you can delete it instead of changing the name like this. If there's construction happening (or another building in its place), feel free to map it to the best of your ability too.
felipeeugenio (2025-12-04 18:56:44+00:00): Hola. Es un place=neighbourhood
Puede ser agregado como nodo o como área en el mismo landuse= que modifica, si es que acaso ésta es conocida.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175512156
mbela (2025-12-04 18:55:13+00:00): thank you!
James Derrick (2026-02-14 07:43:28+00:00): Hi CB,
I've used ESRI to add the remaining buildings in Chambers Court, but would appreciate you checking the UPRN/numbers (e.g. 13?, 54-58):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178532636

Thanks and Happy Mapping,

James
confusedbuffalo (2026-02-17 16:06:06+00:00): Tricky one.

I think we can be confident there is no 13, due to the other UPRNs being consecutive from 1 to 15.

In the council tax data, 15 and 16 have the same UPRN, so there's some error there.

There is only 54, 56 and 58 around here, although there have been known to be houses missing from the data.

I'll put a note here to be surveyed
James Derrick (2026-02-17 16:43:04+00:00): Hi,
Ah - that detail helps, thanks.

A building once confounded me for a month - eventually spotted it was 4x flats with side entrances. Cadastral data doesn't help with housing associations.

I occasionally visit Barry's Bargains on the high street, so might manage a ground survey.
Thanks and Happy Mapping,

James
FajrAl (2025-12-05 02:35:51+00:00): This is truly Bishan East subzone, https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q11961155
FajrAl (2025-12-05 02:37:57+00:00): Oh wait, it's Marymount
Bastianowitz (2026-03-08 21:55:03+00:00): Hallo,
bezugnehmend auf die Notiz. Weil es leider so üblich geworden ist, Haltestelle doppelt bis dreifach zu kartieren samt des Namens. So haben wir den Haltepunkt, die Haltestelle samt Wartebereich und noch dazu am besten einen Bahnsteig.  Dreimal mindesten die gleichen Namen samt identischen Werten versehen. 
Das sehe ich problematisch.
MxxCon (2025-12-07 04:11:47+00:00): Hello.
You can tag this as a vacant business or use lifecycle prefix until the new biz opens.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175513391
Gonéo (2025-12-05 12:46:05+00:00): Bonjour, tu as modifié le parking rue Claude Debussy (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/959806322/history). Je ne vois aucune indication qui indique qu'il est privé, as tu une source ?
HugoApus (2025-12-05 14:28:17+00:00): Bonjour, je suis pas très expérimenté sur OSM mais je cherche à mettre l'accès en restreint parce que c'est un parking. Sauf que vu qu'il y a un nom cela est comptabilisé dans Wandrer, une appli qui se connecte à OSM. Que pourrais je mettre pour que le parking ne soit pas comptabilisé pour vélos et piétons sans bloquer l'accès ? Merci de l'aide par avance :)
Gonéo (2025-12-05 15:10:11+00:00): Je ne connais pas l'application Wandrer. Une règle générale est de «ne faut pas tagguer pour le rendu», ni pour une application. Les données doivent représenter la réalité et c'est aux différentes applications de les interpréter.

En regardant les données je ne vois de nom ni sur le parking ni sur l'allée de parking. À première vue ça ne diffère pas d'un autre parking. Il faut peut-être regarder si tu vois des différences de comportement avant d'autres parkings du secteur.

Tu peux poser la question sur le forum (connexion possible avec ton compte OSM), peut-être que certains connaissent l'application en question. https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/
MxxCon (2025-12-07 04:12:54+00:00): Hello.
When adding facebbok info it's sufficient to use just 1 tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175514011
Norbert Dichter (2025-12-04 20:51:48+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175514173
Supaplex (2026-02-07 13:55:17+00:00): 跑到巷弄上，應當在誠品台大店那棟的六樓
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175515022
Supaplex (2026-02-07 13:56:33+00:00): 2026-02-06實地踏查，在巷弄建築外也沒有AED
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175515022
Thibault Rommel (2026-02-06 20:22:11+00:00): Door building=townhall te verwijderen, wordt het gebouw niet meer op de kaart getoond. Kan je dit eens bekijken?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1252006976/
Marcos Dione (2026-04-04 12:18:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456102127

is this a bridge?
unen (2025-12-17 09:42:26+00:00): Selamlar, otopark alanını farkında olmadan bölerek aynı değişiklik kümesinde gereksiz multipoligon oluşturduğunuzun farkında mısınız? 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Park alanını birleştirerek basit poligona çeviriyorum, ek olarak Merkezi Derslik B ve Big Slice Pizza ile birleşik olan düğümleri ayırıyorum. 

İyi günler.
user_23196460 (2025-12-17 15:09:45+00:00): > gereksiz multipoligon oluşturduğunuzun farkında mısınız?

Farkında değilim?

dönüştürdüğünüz otopark (11285145) 5 sene önce oluşturulmuş ve siz dönüştürene kadar v1'de kalmış, şu anda tartıştığımız değişiklik kümesinin değiştirdiği şeylerde de sadece binayla ilgili şeyler var. Ama önemli değil, yersiz bir multipolygondan kurtulduğumuz için mutluyum.
TX-K (2026-02-24 02:05:02+00:00): No cameras present in this location as of 06Feb2026. I believe they were part of a mobile traffic light for road construction work, as several temporary traffic lights with cameras were observed along US67 between McCamey and San Angelo.
Frans S (2025-12-11 13:55:48+00:00):  * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object.
 * Please accurately outline all buildings.
 * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such as roads and paths.
 * Buildings should have their corners squared.
Norbert Dichter (2025-12-04 20:34:36+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175517145
FCO (2025-12-05 06:37:29+00:00): Også fint med den. :)
MarkoŠatrak (2025-12-06 20:10:33+00:00): Reverting since split was not done at the crossroad #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175599679
JuanElDemografo (2025-12-05 02:14:39+00:00): Are these signed locally with their phase numbers? Ideally the main name tag should be what's observable on the ground, and other possibly relevant names should go in one of the other name tags.
Apathetic_Engineer (2025-12-05 02:33:30+00:00): Oh, no the phase part is not included on the public facing signage. I just happened to know what phases they were. I can update is to show the general name. 

For the "Edgewood at Morganfield" areas, should both feature be merged into a single feature or retain both and have the additional tags?
JuanElDemografo (2025-12-05 03:10:12+00:00): Yeah that'll definitely be the end state, though keeping it separate with landuse=construction may be appropriate for the time being.
felipeeugenio (2025-12-05 11:34:19+00:00): idem: Fue eliminado el tag building=

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175517976
tmr21 (2025-12-05 13:19:24+00:00): Dale.
A todo esto, cuando aparecen los cambios en el mapa online? Solo están en modo edit.
felipeeugenio (2025-12-05 13:28:59+00:00): Hola. Se demoran un poco. hay que tener paciencia.
saludos
I-76 (2025-12-04 20:44:19+00:00): Surveyed with video capture
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-12-05 01:32:15+00:00): The link doesn't work on my end.
FCO (2025-12-05 06:18:10+00:00): Ok jeg kan se du har korrigeret den. Super, tak. :)
Men da er stadivæk en ca. 30 m rød linje nordlig til fyrtårn. De er ikke tilgængelig.
Linus W Frische (2025-12-05 08:23:29+00:00): Det ligner på luftfoto at der er sat afspærring op, sådan at man lige kan gå på bådebroen, men ikke på molen.
FCO (2025-12-05 10:12:36+00:00): Ja det er korrekt. Tilgang kun til bådebroen. Resten af molen er mere eller mindre i stykker.
felipeeugenio (2025-12-05 11:33:21+00:00): Hola. El tag building es para edificios, no para el recinto completo. Fue corregido. Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175518740
tmr21 (2025-12-05 13:23:02+00:00): Vale, gracias. Actualizaré una vez que tenga mas información sobre el recinto.
¿Cuando apaercen los cambios en el mapa oficial online?
tecHORS (2025-12-05 08:32:44+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1750806676134011
MarkoŠatrak (2025-12-06 20:26:26+00:00): Reverting west side of Sherwood Forest Road edit since split was done at the wrong crossroad #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175600107
TheBestIdea (2025-12-29 20:10:07+00:00): Hey MxxCon,
I think this stretch was just repaved. You  really think smoothness should be good, not excellent?
-Brandon
MxxCon (2025-12-29 20:16:41+00:00): It can be excellent. I think the wording or options of MapComplete made me tag it that way.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175519218
MxxCon (2025-12-29 20:18:24+00:00): It's this style https://mapcomplete.org/cycle_infra.html
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175519218
MxxCon (2025-12-29 20:24:59+00:00): Ah, the prompt from that app was:
Usable for thin rollers: rollerblade, skateboard
Usable for thin wheels: racing bike 

Since I haven't ridden skateboards or rollerblades since I was a teenager, I didn't want to answer that surface is good enough for that, but I know it's good enough for road bikes :) so I picked that.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175519218
HirschKauz (2025-12-04 21:15:44+00:00): ups - zu schnell gespeichert 
CS Comment: deleted based on a comment on a former CS 117942100
mweper (2025-12-04 23:35:00+00:00): Hola. Gracias por colaborar.
Revisé tu adición de la escuela y tuve el atrevimiento de mejorarlo con el área correspondiente + los edificios lindantes.
Cualquier error que puedas llegar a ver, eres bienvenido a mejorarlo o puedes contactarme y te ayudaré al respecto.

Aquí está el área de la escuela: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456137692
Frans S (2025-12-20 10:24:43+00:00): Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. * Please accurately outline all buildings.
 * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such as roads and paths.
 * Buildings should have their corners squared.



Keep on mapping!
MarkoŠatrak (2025-12-06 20:52:05+00:00): Reverted because of unnecessary splits and restrictions set on part of the way not covered by a traffic sign #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175600849
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-05 05:13:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456116699

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-05 05:13:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456117651

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
trial (2025-12-08 16:24:48+00:00): Please note that in this area, PCRS raster has a far better imagery, making edits easier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=175521044#map=20/47.7631149/-3.3492557
(anyway, your change is fine).
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-03 19:42:33+00:00): А есть ссылка на описание Озёрной аллеи?
gurglypipe (2025-12-04 23:36:35+00:00): Heya, what’s the reasoning for adding this? As I understand it, the gas turbines at Heysham 1 & 2 are for internal use for running the Heysham plant in case of a trip or grid disconnection; they don’t export energy to the grid. They’re also gas fuelled, not oil fuelled, I believe?
gurglypipe (2025-12-05 16:58:08+00:00): https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/892400/Variation_Notice_BM4252IJ-V003.pdf confirms that these generators are permitted for <500 hours of operation per year, in emergency situations. They’re diesel fuelled.

I don’t think it warrants being mapped as a power plant. It’s just part of the components of the nuclear power plant.
gurglypipe (2025-12-07 18:21:47+00:00): I’ve reverted this change (as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175634900) as above. Happy to chat if you think the reasoning above is incorrect :)
dzamper (2026-06-12 18:10:37+00:00): Nie ma potrzeby dodawać do OSM nieistniejących w terenie peronów takich jak ten np.: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456124401
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-05 05:13:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1350431069

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2025-12-14 13:25:27+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
* Please accurately outline all buildings.
You often just draw a rectangle.  Often there are more extensions and recessed parts.
Best regards
Joseph R P (2025-12-06 23:53:35+00:00): Since this is such a short section and these are only minor informal at-grade track road connections, mostly made by by maintenance vehicles, off road vehicles, and traffic trying to take shortcuts from the frontage roads, I think leaving it as motorway here should be fine. Most Interstates and rural freeways will have sporadic dirt roads spurring off them, and it seems especially common in western states.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-12-08 17:27:35+00:00): Okay. Well, isn't one of the rules for Interstates be that they don't have at-grade intersections? (I know this isn't an Interstate [yet], but still...)
eggie (2025-12-05 06:00:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Je slaat wel kleine stukjes over.
Strikt genomen zou het gewoon voor mofa en moped moeten routeren per default. Er staat nergens motor_vehicle=no
motorcycle en motorcar zijn hier apart benoemd.
Je slaat wel kleine stukjes over in je tagging bij de bruggen?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175522966

Wanneer er een C12 bord staat dan is de tagging eigenlijk
way 	motor_vehicle=no & moped=yes & mofa=yes & traffic_sign=NL:C12
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Jrrs (2025-12-06 22:55:19+00:00): Bedankt voor je welkom en uitleg, Eggie. Ik heb de kleine stukjes nu op dezelfde manier aangepast. Er staat een C12 bord aan beide kanten van de route (Nesse Tiendweg langs de B.H. Boezem) en aan het eind (Beijerswegje). Staat het dan goed of moet er nog iets aangepast worden? 
Ik gebruik de fietsapp Naviki (die OSM gebruikt) omdat die een speed pedelec-instelling heeft. Naviki stuurt me altijd terug als ik deze route wil nemen. Daarom heb ik deze tags toegevoegd. Heb ik eerder gedaan bij de Algerabrug en dat werkte.
Jrrs (2025-12-06 22:57:17+00:00): Overigens las ik ergens dat het asfalteren tijdelijk is. Als de IJsseldijk is opgehoogd wordt het weer deels karrenspoor. Maar dat duurt nog jaren. Er wordt momenteel zelfs straatverlichting aangelegd voor de veiligheid van de fietssers.
eggie (2025-12-06 23:09:47+00:00): Hoi.. Eigenlijk zou je een berichtje kunnen sturen naar die app bouwer.
Zou die naar motorcycle kijken?
Die zou zich aan het routeringsprincipe van osm 'moeten' confirmeren.
Maar goed... kwaad kan het niet.. want bij c12 hoort moped en mofa = yes.
Tja.. de werkzaamheden gaan nog wel even duren. 
Groet..
eggie
bartgron (2025-12-05 21:55:53+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Lishoo (2025-12-07 14:29:30+00:00): Dodałem budynki i drogi korzystając z ortofotomapy i poprzedniej wizyty w terenie.
bartgron (2025-12-08 09:39:35+00:00): Dziękuję, pamiętaj żeby dawać takie informacje w opisie zestawów zmian zamiast "poprawiłem okolicę".
Pozdrawiam
bartgron (2025-12-05 21:55:27+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Lishoo (2025-12-07 14:30:12+00:00): Dodałem budynki i drogi korzystając z ortofotomapy i poprzedniej wizyty w terenie.
Herwescheluc (2025-12-09 08:57:59+00:00): Hallo, Daneel76,

für diesen Änderungssatz finden sich 6 Fehlermeldungen, siehe: https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=14&lat=50.67854&lon=8.30476&item=3032%2C3160%2C9001&level=1%2C2%2C3&loc=14/50.57884/8.48216.

Grüße
Andreas
Almorca (2025-12-31 18:44:33+00:00): Buenas. Has editado la calle Cocherón de la villa y la Avenida de la albufera con imágenes de satélite cuándo estas están desactualizadas.
Almorca (2025-12-31 18:45:48+00:00): Por favor, revierte el cambio en esa glorieta.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 10:09:14+00:00): Hello!

You used
amenity=University
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1156799638/history

Have you maybe meant
amenity=university
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
TwistedFW (2026-02-04 14:14:35+00:00): Oh! Yea, you're right! Ill fix it now ^-^
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-05 08:28:38+00:00): 

Thanks for a fix! And for your mapping in general!

and if you flush browser cache (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Browser_cache ) it should appear on rendered map :)
Supaplex (2026-02-26 12:50:26+00:00): 需再確認位置，跑到馬路上
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524210
Supaplex (2026-02-26 12:50:57+00:00): 需再確認位置，跑到馬路上
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524210
Supaplex (2026-02-26 12:49:42+00:00): 需再確認位置，跑到大門口了
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524215
Supaplex (2026-02-26 12:49:07+00:00): 需再確認位置，並非建築內
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524218
Supaplex (2026-02-26 12:44:03+00:00): 位置需再確認，跑到農田裡
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524223
Supaplex (2026-02-26 12:43:30+00:00): 位置需再確認，跑到校園外
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524225
Supaplex (2026-02-26 12:42:42+00:00): 位置需再確認，跑到廠區門口
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524230
Supaplex (2026-02-26 12:41:56+00:00): 位置需再確認，跑到校門口了
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524236
Supaplex (2026-02-26 12:39:46+00:00): 需再確認位置，不在校園內
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524269
Supaplex (2026-02-26 12:37:51+00:00): 需再確認位置，跑到農田裡
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524270
Supaplex (2026-02-26 11:07:02+00:00): 需再確認位置，不在校園內
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524283
Supaplex (2026-02-26 11:06:07+00:00): 需再確定位置，不在校園內
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524293
Supaplex (2026-02-24 15:11:52+00:00): 位置需再確認，跑到校門口了
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524296
Supaplex (2026-02-22 15:19:33+00:00): 位置需再確認，跑到田裡
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524315
Supaplex (2026-02-22 15:19:12+00:00): 需再確認位置，跑到馬路中央
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175524317