piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-20 23:33:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526432456

are you sure about that wikipedia tag?

(BTW, you may be interested in https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator-reports/Australia.html - let me know if you checked it and it has any bogus complaints)
aharvey (2025-08-21 02:59:30+00:00): Thanks! Yes that was my mistake, fixed now.
Timmy_Tesseract (2026-04-01 07:25:15+00:00): Hi and thanks for your awesome contributions to OSM!

I noticed that you added bicycle=no on several ways around here. Access tags in OSM are intended for legal restrictions.

If it is not forbidden to ride a mountain bike here then more suitable tagging would be to add details like smoothness or sac_scale to indicate how rough or difficult the trails are for bicycles.
Metzor (2025-05-28 17:14:06+00:00): Hallo rigilk3nt,

Danke, du hast völlig Recht!

Und als ich primary/link dort in der Ecke geändert habe, war mir nicht klar, dass du es in trunk umgetaggt hast. Ich dachte, ich ändere mein eigenes Tagging. Sonst hätte ich dich vorher gefragt...

Was hältst du davon, alle an das östliche "Metzingen-Ost" angrenzende Wege in primary(_link) zu ändern - außer natürlich die beiden Richtung nach Reutlingen. Irgendwie ist es aktuell seltsam, dass die B 28 ein paar hundert Meter östlich sich ohne Kreuzung von trunk in primary ändert. Aber das hängt wohl letztlich davon ab, ob man den Autobahn-ähnlichen Ausbau oder die (von Kreuzung zu Kreuzung) durchgehende Verkehrsbedeutung zugrunde legt.

Viele Grüße
Metzor
jrklein (2025-06-14 22:29:11+00:00): Thanks for publishing these! I am beginning to publish sightings in Springfield MO. After reviewing your nodes, I see that I should add a few more tags to mine. Nice work.
extra5gold (2025-06-14 23:00:30+00:00): Thanks! I know there are more in Branson that I’ll have to confirm on my next trip. There are also articles about them being installed in Nixa.
felipeeugenio (2025-05-26 12:55:19+00:00): Hola. No existen esas cosas? eso es grave. Este es el changeset del mapero que hizo eso: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166416231#map=19/-33.121844/-71.588047

por favor comentarle el changeset igual que yo estoy comentando este. Cualquier problema te vamos a ayudar., o revisar por favor sus otras ediciones, para borrar todo lo inventado.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166757138
Daemon Targaryen (2025-05-26 16:45:43+00:00): Hola, pues no. No existe (ni puede existir) un 'parque' en ese lugar. Son terrenos privados. Tampoco existe una 'calle Atalaya'. Por más que en el PRC esté planificada, el área no está ni cerca de ser urbanizada todavía, por lo que no corresponde ponerle nombre a un cortafuegos. Se lo comentaré más tarde al mapero que presumo lo hizo de buena fe y no mero vandalismo.
Saludos!
felipeeugenio (2025-05-26 17:06:04+00:00): Buena. Gracias
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-14 05:27:27+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed doubtful import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167599357
zstadler (2025-09-21 11:40:03+00:00): שלום ggefen,

שוב תודה על תרומתך למיפוי ב OSM!

התגית "שם" מיועדת לשם הפרטי של העצם. במקרה של דרך, זה יכול להיות שם הרחוב או השם של הדרך הספציפית כמו דרך נוף יער טורען

התגית
highway=unclassified
 מתארת היטב את הקטע ככביש אספלט.

אפשר, אבל לא חייבים, להוסיף 
surface=paved
או
surface=asphalt
כדי לדייק

נשמח אם תצטרף לערוץ הטלגרם של הממפים בישראל
https://t.me/OSM_Israel
שם אפשר להתייעץ ולראות שאלות של אחרים

בברכה,
זאב
watmildon (2025-07-29 06:51:43+00:00): Found an amusing typo in this changeset for the building:levels on this buidling: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/267850947
pittrichimica (2025-07-29 16:17:54+00:00): Oops, too many keyclicks. Thanks for correcting ;-)
NeisBot (2025-05-26 03:54:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
citrula (2025-05-26 05:32:35+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166759521
NeisBot (2025-05-26 04:12:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-05-26 20:32:40+00:00): Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166766852
RedGreenBlue09 (2025-05-26 08:40:51+00:00): Quốc lộ trọng yếu --> trunk
Quốc lộ thứ yếu / QL đoạn được chuyển đổi thành đường đô thị --> primary

Để biết đường nào thứ yếu, trọng yếu, bạn có thể xem quy hoạch quốc gia
https://congbao.chinhphu.vn/noi-dung-van-ban-so-1454-qd-ttg-34265?cbid=36723

Còn để biết đoạn nào đã được chuyển đổi thành đường đô thị, bạn phải xem quy hoạch từng tỉnh. Nếu không chắc thì giữ nguyên.
catgirlseraid (2025-05-31 07:17:34+00:00): Hi, 

Welcome to OSM! Thank you for adding your business. I've added the opening hours and social media links from your website in this changeset, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166999394. If any of the information is incorrect, or you would like help with anything in OSM please comment and I'm happy to help.

Thanks, Phoebe
Taksine (2025-05-26 13:46:34+00:00): 感谢，画这路的时候AI出问题了
NeisBot (2025-05-26 04:51:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-05-26 20:33:02+00:00): Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166766781
aharvey (2025-05-26 08:36:41+00:00): hi, it may well be dangerous, but the kerb ramps on either side imply there is an unmarked crossing here, therefore we should map it as such, and we should restore the prior unmarked crossing tags.

Routing engines can take this into account when routing or when people are doing network analysis from OSM data.
紬ヴェンダース (2025-05-26 05:39:42+00:00): Resolved
Dawid2849 (2025-05-27 12:58:57+00:00): Cześć. 

W tej edycji wkradł się niby drobny błąd, który jednak całkowicie zepsuł routing w kierunku Gdańska. Naprawiłem go w: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/772924245
Dawid2849 (2025-05-27 12:59:18+00:00): nie ten link, miałem podlinkować zestaw zmian :P
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166825647
Artur | Yanosik (2025-05-28 06:35:59+00:00): Cześć, dziękuję za poprawienie :)
Jrachi (2025-05-27 07:22:59+00:00): Ciao.
Quando aggiungi i luoghi di posa, nella relazione, aggiungi il ruolo guidepost.

Ivo
Paolo Montevecchi (2025-05-27 07:32:34+00:00): Ivo, hai ragiorne, me lo hai già detto un mese fa! Mi sono dimenticato.
Ma nei 4 luoghi che ho inserito ieri lo hai messo tu il ruolo vero? Perchè adesso c'è
Jrachi (2025-05-27 08:08:30+00:00): Si.
A volte avviso l'user, a volte sistemo e poi avviso.
Oggi sto trovando tanti ruoli mancanti.

Ivo
L'imaginaire (2025-05-26 08:29:23+00:00): 👍
user_5359 (2025-05-26 08:25:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! A rising building inside of a building? Did you see that the existing building have the house number 20 and your building the number 2068?
NeisBot (2025-05-26 06:21:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-05-29 09:32:07+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/166910932
hsc666 (2025-05-30 15:37:47+00:00): Hallo jayo_map und willkommen bei OSM!

Bitte sieh Dir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name an! Briefkästen haben weder einen Eigennamen noch eine Adresse.

VG
hsc666
GrabSG_JasonL (2025-06-02 04:05:58+00:00): Hi SS_L, could i kindly confirm that the road works here are only starting from 8th June. Meaning that as of today 2nd June, Lim Chu Kang Road is still accessible? 

As when the way was changed to under construction it has affected our routing and thus cause our drivers to make a huge detour via Cemetery Road when coming from Jalan Bahar and heading up North. 

If possible could i request that I change it back to Primary until end of the week, then i'll change it to construction again :)?

Thank you!
SS_L (2025-06-02 07:00:11+00:00): Hi Jason, yes Lim Chu Kang Rd will be realigned wef 08/06/25. Reason being that it was updated earlier is because we need to download the affected changes prior before its implementation. I have already downloaded the map with the changes, you can change it back, but pls remember to update it to the new alignment.
GrabSG_JasonL (2025-06-02 07:12:13+00:00): Hi SS_L, thanks for the cooperation! Yep, my team will make the change back by friday end of working day. 

Thanks once again!
eggie (2025-05-26 07:15:46+00:00): Beter alleen specifiek taggen voor access en niet nogmaals algemeen access=permissive

Nu met je naast motorcar=no ook nog eens motor_vehicle=no
Vraag anders even de voorgaande mapper.
Het is getagd als voetgangersgebied. 
Kennelijk mag je er fietsen op Eigen Terrein en niet rijden met een motorvoertuig?
De default op een pedestrian dat alles met wielen niet routeert.
De uitzondering kun je dan aangeven wie er wel mag rijden. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-26 09:52:41+00:00): access=permissive
.bicycle=yes ?
A67-A67 (2025-05-26 10:04:24+00:00): Vanwege de naam neem ik aan dat dit een coffeeshop en geen tabakswinkel is. Dan is de correcte tag shop=cannabis.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcannabis
donux-nl (2025-05-26 14:29:04+00:00): Dank je voor je reactie. Lijkt me inderdaad beter. Heb de andere coffeeshop in de straat ook meteen gewijzigd. Groet, Donux
eggie (2025-05-26 07:25:10+00:00): Dag Bendinko,

Wanneer er géén bord staat met verboden voor fietsers C14..  dan gebruik je use_sidepath.
De fietser wordt geacht het fietspad te volgen. 
Staat er wel een bord dan =no De fietser mag niet fietsen hier en zal dus het fietspad volgen. 
Een nuanceverschil maar wel met reden.
Er staat volgens mij hier geen geslotenverklaring voor fietsers. ... dus heb je het correct aangepast. 
MVG
eggie
habi (2025-05-26 12:57:16+00:00): Ciao Comino

Triggered by one of your changesets close to where I live, I'm now looking at other changesets from you.
Here you're removing correctly mapped data on a node on the building, so there's not really a 'way' involved here as you write in your changeset.
If you'd have looked at the address data available in Switzerland before simply moving the data to a new node (https://qa.poole.ch/addresses/ch/) you would not have made the map worse.

Also, if the *whole* building is occupied by the company, the building itself can be tagged with the correct tags, there's no *need* for it to be a singular node.

So, please take care when moving address data around.
And - if you really want to make OpenStreetMap better - you could also comment on the changeset of the person who originally added the information, to educate them.

Happy mapping,
habi
Comino (2025-05-26 14:18:25+00:00): Hi Habi,

You're right that it was not a "way" but a "point" that was involved. I mistakenly copied a line of text from the comments I use when closing a changeset.

From your latest change, I can now see that the user disastag changed the entrance tag to include his company details. If I had noticed this entrance tag, I would have corrected it accordingly. Is that what you mean when you say that I made the map worse? I feel that using the entrance tag to include company details is not correct.

Edwin
Comino (2025-05-26 14:20:13+00:00): If BTCmap are going to do an import of the data, we will discuss it. For now, I am waiting for information from DFX (the payment provider) about when and how they will go live (all at once or in batches).
Currently, only three outlets are live (Zug, Kreuzlingen, and Rossrüti). I noticed that not all the Spar outlets are tagged on OSM. I am currently filtering out the ones that are missing. Can I share this list with you when I am done?

Edwin
habi (2025-05-26 16:33:20+00:00): > From your latest change, I can now see that the user disastag changed the entrance tag to include his company details.

There was no entrance tag, but the address point conformed to the position of address node in the data from the Swiss Federal Office.
Moving the data to the center of the building reduced the precision.

> I feel that using the entrance tag to include company details is not correct.

Fully agree. The entrance node to the building should be added at the correct position to help routers. If a POI is mapped in the building it is best if the position of that node corresponds to the real position. If the whole building is one office, the tags can also go on the building outline.
habi (2025-05-26 16:40:20+00:00): > Currently, only three outlets are live (Zug, Kreuzlingen, and Rossrüti). I noticed that not all the Spar outlets are tagged on OSM. I am currently filtering out the ones that are missing.

Your are mixing two things here in the same changeset which doesn't help.
If you import data (from Spar) you *have* to discuss this with the (local) community. How did you get access to the data of the Spars? Does Spar agree that you put this data into OpenStreetMap and thus gives OpenStreetMap a license to distribute that? 

> Can I share this list with you when I am done?

I don't see any sense with sharing the list with *me*, you need to share it with the community, *and* put your import plan up for discussion!
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import for details and go to http://c.osm.org/c/107 to start such a discussion.
Otherwise *all* your recent additions/changes of all the Spars in Switzerland have a big chance of getting reverted!
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-26 21:18:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is this a convenience store or a larger super market? If so, the supermarket tagging may be better.

Please also have a look at the general Israel guidelines here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#The_basics

ברוכים הבאים ותודה על התרומה! האם מדובר במכולת או סופרמרקט? אם זה סופר מרקט, יש תיוג יותר מתאים לכך.

בנוסף, מומלץ לקרוא את ההנחיות לישראל כאן: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HE:Israel
eggie (2025-05-26 07:43:44+00:00): Dag  donux.. Je vraagt feedback 
landuse=industrial  hoort op een vlak en niet een adresnode. 
De spcificatie industrial dus ook. 
Die regel kan dus weg. Het geeft een foutmelding.

Denk eerder aan een office=...  tag
Wanneer je niets kunt vinden dan kun je yes gebruiken. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-26 07:57:44+00:00): De oneigenlijke tags heb ik vervangen door office=yes. Zie ook niet zo snel iets anders.
note aangepast naar description.
description is voor gebruikers... note is voor andere mappers. 
Foutmelding is nu weg. 
Groet
eggie
gendy54 (2025-08-10 13:47:09+00:00): Bonjour,

Pour les prochains sentiers, lisez ceci: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
eggie (2025-05-26 07:46:04+00:00): Dit is oke als het een niet verplaatsbaar paaltje is.
MVG
eggie
渤海西岸 (2025-05-28 11:13:29+00:00): stop！停止你的错误编辑，你对关系的使用没有一次用对过，不要再继续下去了，这是一种画蛇添足的破坏
aixbrick (2025-05-28 17:18:51+00:00): Hallo,
rückgängig gemacht mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166885862. Ich hatte in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156044425 erklärt, warum Sperrungen in OSM nur eingetragen werden, wenn sie mindesten 3 Monate dauern, diese hier dauert aber nur 4 Wochen (https://www.strassen.nrw.de/de/meldung/l218-pfarrer-dickmann-strasse-in-huertgenwald-ab-21-5-gesperrt.html).
Gruß
s8evq (2025-05-26 11:14:20+00:00): Dit ziet er allemaal correct uit.
infeeeee (2025-05-27 13:13:09+00:00): Szia!

Mint a fórumban is írtam, 100 évvel ezelőtti állapotnak nincs helye OSM-en, OpenHistoricalMap-en viszont örülnének ennek. Módosításcsomag visszavonva.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166826468
eggie (2025-05-26 10:40:29+00:00): Dag Johan,
Tja dat is een pragmatische oplossing. Wanneer het van korte duur is zou je de palen gewoon kunnen laten staan. 
Maar volgens mij zijn het gescheiden rijbanen voor fietsers hier en zijn de paaltjes verwijderbaar.
Dan kun je toch gewoon  bollard=removable bijtaggen? .. en evt emergency=yes
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-26 10:50:52+00:00): Johan.. Die fietsoversteek heb ik verdubbeld.. Er zit een middenberm tussen. De paaltjes aan de zuidzijde heb ik voorlopig weggelaten.
Gr eggie
Johan de Ruiter (2025-05-26 11:37:39+00:00): Eggie. Bedankt voor het meedenken!!
aharvey (2025-05-28 02:42:31+00:00): thanks, fyi it should be either disused:amenity=bar or amenity=bar but not both tags. it looks like from  your edit you've added the disused by left the amenity=bar intact. I've fixed this now.
Aetolia (2025-05-26 15:23:25+00:00): Stop vandalizing the map. What you are doing is inappropriate and deliberate falsification of international borders. I don't know what are the rules in Italy or in Ancona or in Albania  but the Open street community has warned not to vandalize the Greek Albanian delimitation borders/frontier. Open street map has already been notified on this matter.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-27 00:52:21+00:00): DWG revert - changed feature under dispute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166802214
JanerNaKole (2025-05-27 18:29:41+00:00): Na tym chodniku jest C-16 z "nie dotyczy rowerów" co tagowane jest jako bicycle=yes a nie designated.
user_5359 (2025-05-27 14:03:40+00:00): Hello! What is the mean of the tag strava:heatmap = high?
julcnx (2025-05-27 14:16:36+00:00): Hi! This is a experimental tag I started using for trails with high activity on the Strava Heatmap — usually popular segments. Combined with imagery or GPS traces, it can help confirm if a path actually exists.
NeisBot (2025-05-26 08:31:09+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-05-26 20:35:19+00:00): Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166791915
Andrea Del Sarto (2025-05-30 11:02:35+00:00): ciao 08-D,
la codifica del ref:REI è a 8 cifre, come indicato nelle linee guida CAI
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:ref:REI

quindi il percorso a ref:REI LFIC7460
puoi sistemare?

grazie e buona mappatura
Andrea Del Sarto (2025-05-30 11:05:23+00:00): *ha ref:REI ops
aharvey (2025-05-26 21:29:19+00:00): From the imagery it looks like it might be a combined basketball and netball court?
jbcharron (2025-05-26 20:35:31+00:00): Bonsoir Paul,
Bienvenue dans la communauté OpenStreetMap.
Pour information, l'utilisation de Google Streetview n'est pas autorisée légalement, en effet Google interdit la réutilisation des ces photos de rues. Je me suis permis de faire quelques ajustements sur la voie cyclable que vous avez ajouté
Bonne soirée
Jean-Baptiste
addr: (2025-05-26 08:45:52+00:00): Случайно большая вышла.
pesec (2025-05-27 04:19:23+00:00): Добрый день.
Данным пакетом правок вы добавили дома неправильной геометрии случайным образом. Их положение не соответствует доступным спутниковым снимкам.
С какой целью это сделано?
RRIbarruri (2025-05-28 15:28:22+00:00): Не сочтите за труд какие именно дома я указал случайным образом
pesec (2025-05-29 11:29:14+00:00): ул.Киселёвых с 18 по 38 расположение и форма домов не соответствуют.
Массовое копирование вами трапециевидного дома - это не профессионально.
ул.Семёновых с 63 по 85 также.
pesec (2025-05-29 11:35:52+00:00): Хотя, возможно, я ошибаюсь и это сделано до вас:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112828430#map=14/57.22274/65.27298
pesec (2025-05-29 11:35:55+00:00): Хотя, возможно, я ошибаюсь и это сделано до вас:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112828430#map=14/57.22274/65.27298
RRIbarruri (2025-05-30 08:08:09+00:00): "Хотя, возможно, я ошибаюсь и это сделано до вас:" - вот это наиболее вероятный вариант. Я максимум углы подравнял если там совсем дичь была.
george1201 (2026-04-06 23:07:20+00:00): Hallo esge-001,
wo kommt der Name Gollenholzweg her? Gibt es Beschilderungen vor Ort?
Lumikeiju (2025-05-26 16:53:12+00:00): I'm not sure how the bridge went from `surface=wood` to `surface=asphalt` in my changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166766038 - thanks for catching and fixing that. :) Happy mapping!
Anonymous897234 (2025-05-27 06:42:11+00:00): All is well. Thanks for all your fixes.
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-26 13:01:17+00:00): Не нужно расширять здания на всю территорию участка
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-26 13:01:29+00:00): Ещё, в правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее
bxl-forever (2025-05-27 23:05:57+00:00): Vous avez supprimé le parking d'un magasin en indiquant « Essai ».

Est-ce que nous comprenons que le parking existe toujours en réalité ? Qu’en est-il, svp ?
bxl-forever_repair (2025-05-30 09:34:28+00:00): ## REVERTED CHANGESET ##
map per (2025-05-27 05:11:48+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
rempshaener (2025-05-26 18:37:55+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Sieht gut aus – ich habe keine Anmerkung.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
marc__marc (2025-12-08 00:06:55+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12864267956
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12864267957
2 issues : 
palm is not a species, it's a taxon=Arecaceae
a tree can't be genus=Prunus and taxon=Arecaceae/Palm, it is not the same plant lineage.
I will let you double-check in the field and add the correct value from the two options.
Regards,
Marc
NeisBot (2025-05-26 09:39:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
HYLBOX (2025-05-26 09:48:52+00:00): i did, tho its hard to not include SEO
NeisReview (2025-05-27 05:28:37+00:00): 👍 Thank you for your map updates.
map per (2025-05-27 05:40:59+00:00): Hello Hades71,

are there really two supermarkets in this building or is the supermarket you added a duplicate of "Super Linella" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11658491749)

Thanks and best regards
map per
map per (2025-06-12 12:46:59+00:00): And it would be nice if you could also enter the names of the places you add
literan (2025-05-26 20:23:29+00:00): поверх здания, вот так тяп-ляп? нет, таких правок нам не нужно, откат