piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
joost schouppe (2025-09-05 12:22:12+00:00): Hi there,
You added a new fire station https://osm.org/way/1421492400 , but that same station was already mapped on the building https://osm.org/way/44740132. While it makes perfect sense to map this on an area outline instead of on a building, please make sure not to create duplicate amenities this way. And move relevant info as much as possible from the details within the site to the outline of the site. I'll adapt it now.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-26 19:42:51+00:00): Reverted adding this SEO spam POI with just a spam description=*, name=* and website=* (no top-level tags) which also broke a nearby multipolygon by adding the POI to it as outer

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183226448
Ponderosopine (2025-08-12 00:49:37+00:00): I'm confused by what you did here. It looks like you just deleted a lot of nodes for some reason
bdiscoe (2025-08-12 06:45:54+00:00): Yes. Reducing overnoding (of nearly colinear nodes) is valuable in many ways; it makes editing and maintenance easier, it speeds every aspect of serving maps.  I'm happy to explain further.
Ponderosopine (2025-08-12 14:13:11+00:00): If you're going to make this many changes to all of the roads that I fixed or added myself, it would be great if you could ask me first so that I can go through and do it. I don't agree with some of the nodes you deleted and some could have been moved to preserve the curve in the road, so I'm going to have to go back through all of the these in the near future.
bdiscoe (2025-08-12 19:17:42+00:00): I appreciate your dedication to manually caring for these roads.  In this case, the threshold was only _20cm_.  That is just under 8 inches.  No nodes were moved, and the interpolated way did not move by more than 8 inches.  Even in cases of extreme micromapping, 8 inches should neither be visible nor require anyone to "go back thru them".  Trust the geometric algorithm.
Lumikeiju (2025-08-12 19:48:40+00:00): I haven't checked every node that was removed, but in general I agree with @Ponderosopine here - @bdiscoe, you should not recklessly use the Simplify tool to reduce the detail of someone else's contributions. There's an argument to be made for using a value of 0.01 m to remove truly redundant nodes, or using the tool on imports with "fake" accuracy / interpolation geometry, but 0.3 m is definitely high enough to be destructive of accurate contributions.
Lumikeiju (2025-08-12 19:50:56+00:00): I haven't checked every node that was removed, but in general I agree with @Ponderosopine here - @bdiscoe, you should not recklessly use the Simplify tool to reduce the detail of someone else's contributions. There's an argument to be made for using a value of 0.01 m to remove truly redundant nodes, or using the tool on imports with "fake" accuracy / interpolation geometry, but 0.3 m is definitely high enough to be destructive of accurate contributions.
Lumikeiju (2025-08-12 19:56:28+00:00): I haven't checked every node that was removed, but in general I agree with @Ponderosopine here - @bdiscoe, you should not recklessly use the Simplify tool to reduce the detail of someone else's contributions. There's an argument to be made for using a value of 0.01 m to remove truly redundant nodes, or using the tool on imports with "fake" accuracy / interpolation geometry, but 0.3 m is definitely high enough to be destructive of accurate contributions.
Lumikeiju (2025-08-12 19:59:06+00:00): Apologies for the duplicate replies - OSM was returning a Network Error when I clicked Comment and not showing that it had been posted. :l
eggie (2025-08-11 08:13:57+00:00): Lijkt me oke.
Gr eggie
phoenixsaigon1698 (2025-08-11 08:17:22+00:00): check lại biển báo này trên ahorn.lima-city.de/tr nhé bạn
eggie (2025-08-11 08:23:15+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Bedankt voor uw bijdrage.
MVG
eggie
validator
eggie (2025-08-11 10:53:43+00:00): Welkomstbericht per PB toegestuurd
woodpeck (2025-08-11 11:23:50+00:00): Hello, in this changeset you did nothing but split a road into two pieces. Your changeset description "change the number and type of road lanes " is inaccurate because you changed neither the number nor the type of road lanes. What was your intention here?
user_23114475 (2025-08-13 10:12:17+00:00): Thanks for your reminder, I have not finish my change at that time, now I have done the update.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-08-26 00:51:47+00:00): DWG revert - individual rooms mapped as buildings

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171002411
eggie (2025-08-11 09:00:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
0000FF berries (2025-08-16 21:30:07+00:00): Καλησπέρα σας.

Ανήκω στους εθελοντές του OpenStreetMap.
Σας γράφω γιατί έχετε δηλώσει πως θέλετε κάποιος να ελέγξει τις πρόσφατες αλλαγές που κάνατε. Πρωτ' απ' όλα, να είστε καλά που θέλετε να βελτιώσετε τα δεδομένα του OpenStreetMap!

Σχετικά με τον δρόμο που προσθέσατε https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/799797188 το ίχνος που προσθέσατε μου φαίνεται μια χαρά. Θα πρότεινα:

1) την αφαίρεση της ετικέτας ετικέτα oneway=yes, που δηλώνει πως είναι ο δρόμος μονής κατευθύνσεως. Δε νομίζω να είναι, γιατί αλλιώς πως επιστρέφουν τα αυτοκίνητα που πάνε στο κτίριο; 

και

2) την αλλαγή του name:en σε int_name (δείτε https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Greece#Names)

Αναφέρατε:

> και να βεβαιωθείτε ότι έχουν προστεθεί σε όλους τους χάρτες;

Οι αλλαγές που κάνετε/κάνουμε γίνονται άμεσα στο www.openstreetmap.org. Τώρα, αν αναφέρεστε σε apps ή σε σελίδες που χρησιμοποιούν δεδομένα OpenStreetMap, το πότε θα φανούν οι αλλαγές εκεί, εξαρτάται από τα apps/σελίδες και από το πόσο συχνά συγχρονίζουν τα δεδομένα τους με το OpenStreetMap.

Αν έχετε απορίες, μπορείτε να ρωτήσετε στο τμήμα του φόρουμ για την Ελλάδα: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/gr/68 ή στείλτε μου μήνυμα.

Καλές χαρτογραφήσεις!
Leo Slager (2025-08-11 10:54:33+00:00): Dag Jasper,

De editor iD is kennelijk nogal onnauwkeurig. Je laat voortdurend fouten op de kaart achter. Door de nodes niet op elkaar te leggen ontstaan elkaar kruisende landuse en dat zorgt dan weer voor vele tientallen foutmeldingen.
Kijk hier eens wat voor chaos je achterlaat op de kaart.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=5.44353&lat=51.89935&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.81&overlays=long_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way%2Clong_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Probeer wat nauwkeuriger te werken. Of nog beter: stap over naar de editor JOSM, dan kun je tenminste zien wat je aan het doen bent.
Groet
Leo
aixbrick (2025-08-11 11:35:05+00:00): Hallo,
das Löschen und Neuerstellen sollte immer die letzte Option sein, da damit der Eindruck erweckt wird, dass es die Objekte vorher nicht gegeben hat. Man radiert sozusagen aus, was vorherige Mapper eingepflegt haben.
Hier kommt hinzu, dass die neuen Nodes sich nicht wirklich von den vorherigen unterscheiden. Die Position ist nahezu identisch und die im Kommentar erwähnten Fotos fehlen.
Rückgängig gemacht mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170287879.
Gruß
ArthurMcGill (2025-08-11 12:03:18+00:00): Hallo Aixbrixck, der Grund war, dass ich die mittlerweile im Wikipedia vorhandenen selbst aufgenommenen Fotos eintragen und die fehlende Daten zu den Einzelpersonen nachtragen wollte, aber ich bekam durch die Enge der Position trotz größtmöglichem Zoomens keinen Zugang zu den einzelnen Steinen (es öffnete sich immer nur einer). Deshalb trug ich diese Steine nochmals mit leicht veränderter und nicht mehr so enger Position ein, um die Einzeldaten zu den Steinen besser anklicken zu können. Die Bilder, so dachte ich, hätte ich ebenfalls nachgetragen, vielleicht aber auch aufgrund der etwas verwirrten Situation vergessen. Die Bilder sind hier: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Stolpersteine_in_Stolberg , denn auch jetzt öffnet sich wieder nur der Salomon und ich komme wieder nicht an die Einzelsteine ran, vielleicht kannst du mir da einen "Trick" verraten? Gruß, Arthur
aixbrick (2025-08-11 12:55:53+00:00): Der "Trick" ist JOSM zu verwenden :-). Mit dem kann man per mittlerer Maustaste übereinanderliegende Objekte durchklicken. Der Online-Editor iD kann das nicht.
Ich habe die Fotos ergänzt und dabei die Nodes etwas auseinandergezogen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170291894.
ArthurMcGill (2025-08-11 13:50:58+00:00): danke für den Tipp und auch das Nachtragen der Bilder, das war mir bisher unbekannt. Gruß, Arthur
Taya_S (2025-09-21 12:31:14+00:00): Reverted data copied from unauthorised sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172243199
statelyelms (2025-09-21 19:51:02+00:00): Hi. I think you may have removed a few ways from the Grand Lake PNA relation and I was wondering why, in case there was something wrong with them. I'd rather not go to the effort to redraw them if there was something the matter with them but I can't imagine what.

If you didn't, I apologize for the inconvenience and have a great day

statelyelms
Palary (2025-09-23 05:02:04+00:00): Hi statelyelms, 

There was a “water inside water” error, bringing the area to our attention. I have removed the polygon belonging to Coys Gut from the Grand Lake relation and separated the water polygons in accordance with the naming. I hope this clarifies my edits to you. Happy to discuss if you’d propose a different solution.
statelyelms (2025-09-24 12:50:57+00:00): Hi Palary!

No worries, those weren't the polygons I was thinking of, I'm sure there was nothing wrong with your edits to those. Just a couple of ways were removed from the protected area relation and I thought it might've been your changeset, but I think I was mistaken.

My apologies!
Palary (2025-09-25 12:50:17+00:00): No worries, statelyelms! Please let me know if I can be of any help regarding the issue you're mentioning. Have a good day.
HanSte23 (2025-12-11 16:40:50+00:00): Hallo franz!,
im Kommentar hast du geschrieben, dass die Straße für KFZ gesperrt ist, aber außer motor_vehicle=no auch noch access=no gesetzt. Ist das Absicht gewesen? Komme leider nicht so bald in die Gegend, um das selbst zu überprüfen.
Viele Grüße, Stefan
franz! (2025-12-11 18:19:34+00:00): Hallo Stefan, war mit dem Motorrad da, kurviger.de hatte mir das vorgeschlagen.
Die Straße ist aber für alle Kfz gesperrt.
Ich schau mir das nochmal an PC an, was dort angeklickt ist.
Gruß Frank
Warin61 (2026-03-02 01:08:35+00:00): Name is for name only, not a description eg 'Terrace Houses'. 

Relation 19448184 deleted - shared segments.
The One Wonderer PathFinder (2025-08-11 23:35:18+00:00): b-holdet - 
Tak for indsatsen og korrektionerne for navnene og beliggenhed af skovene. 

Det er godt at stednavne og angivelser bliver bevaret for eftertiden.
Jeg har selv gået på alle de eksisterende stier og skovveje  i skovene på det meste af Sydsjælland i de sidste ~15 år.
Med venlig hilsen
Nolan_ADAV (2025-08-20 08:56:43+00:00): Bonjour,
Êtes-vous sûre que ce chemin est interdit à la circulation des cycles ? Car souvent quand je l'ai emprunté à pied ou en courant des trottinettes électriques et vélo l'empreinte
BXBlack (2025-08-20 17:06:52+00:00): J'ai essayé de prendre ce chemin en vélo par 2 fois. Il y a une barrière qui ferme l'accés et j'ai vu de nombreuses personnes à pied faire demi tour. J'avoue que je n'ai pas chercher à ouvrir le portail. Si je me souviens bien, il y a aussi des panneaux qui disent que l'endroit est interdit au public. C'est peut-être à vérifier à nouveau. Je ne suis malheureusement pas de la région.
BXBlack (2025-08-20 17:38:49+00:00): En zoomant bien avec le calque Vue Satellite de Google Maps, on devine la barrière qui entoure le site de l'écluse des fontinettes. Donc impossible de traverser l'AA en empruntant cette écluse. A voir jusqu'ou les chemins autour sont autorisés. Peut-être ai-je modifié trop vite et englobé des chemins qui ne sont pas à mettre en privé... A vérifier.
bxl-forever (2025-08-11 09:52:29+00:00): Votre changement a été effacé.

Au Soleil du Midi était déjà sur la carte ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9865668227
Il ne faut pas l'ajouter une deuxième fois.  Et surtout pas en changeant la structure du bâtiment.

Voir commentaire qui vous a été envoyé hier pour expliquer l’erreur : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170234092
Taya_S (2025-09-21 12:31:15+00:00): Reverted data copied from unauthorised sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172243199
Langlaeufer (2025-08-14 19:05:44+00:00): Hallo franz, ist da Reiten explizit verboten?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170281439
rhhs (2025-08-14 11:52:16+00:00): Are you sure the sports pitch on the roof is for football (soccer)? From the street I could see that there are nets to catch balls, but not for what kind of sport it is made. Could it be for tennis, volleyball, etc.?
Dimitar155 (2025-08-14 16:07:40+00:00): I don't know. It looks like a football field from space :)
mikedld (2025-08-11 23:01:13+00:00): Out of curiosity, what's you basis for changing the two My Auchan stores from shop=convenience to shop=supermarket? I see you're using iD which is most definitely suggesting to use shop=convenience (based on https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=brands&k=shop&v=convenience&tt=auchan#myauchan-f3ab02), the brand's Wikidata entry (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q115800307) says it's an instance of "convenience store chain", and OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dsupermarket, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dconvenience) suggests that a supermarket "is large enough to use trolleys". Does any of that contradict what you see on the ground? (your changeset doesn't actually specify if it's based on a survey or local knowledge, so I'm not sure; please consider supplying the source information in the future)
renosmo (2025-08-12 22:53:13+00:00): Hi there. I noticed the suggestion to use the "shop=convenience" tag. But, the reason why I changed it to "shop=supermarket" is because, when I go to these places, I see they're big enough to be called supermarkets (in comparison with convenience stores, which are smaller) - and yes, there are trolleys available as well (of the smaller kind, at least). They're at the bottom of the list of what I would call a supermarket - but still, I think this term is more correct than a mere convenience store, because of the size of the places. Again, I say this because I regularly go to these two places (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3647434258 + https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/359658634). And, the reason why I didn't specify why I was changing the tags, is because I had the impression that no one was looking at these changes, in such a secondary city. But, I'll consider specifying the reasons for changes I make in the future, if I think they're important enough. This being said, there's another "My Auchan" in the city (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6430793477) which, by its size, does make me doubt the use of the tag "supermarket". And, I think that this is where the "problem" lies. Since, this last store is somewhere in the frontier between a supermarket and a convenience store. And, that's probably the reason why the wikis recommend the use of the tag "shop=convenience". I don't think I ever went to "My Auchan" stores in other cities, but I suspect that this particular chain is probably made of a bunch of stores that, by their size, vary between what can barely be called supermarkets and, in fact, convenience stores. So, this is a pretty "grey" area, I guess. If we're more demanding, in terms of the sizes of the stores and of the trolleys used in them, I suppose we can only call all these "convenience stores". But, as I said, when I go to the first two stores that I mentioned, at least, they're what I and everyone else in this city have always called "supermarkets". Maybe this a problem related to how small the economy in this city and my country is, and it all depends on what standards one is used to. But, again, the first two places at least, are what I'm used to hear being referred to, by other people, as "supermarkets". And, I suppose that, the best way to clear doubts, is by going to these places in question. I'll take better looks at them, the next time I go there, and I'll post here more information once I have it.
renosmo (2025-08-27 20:33:52+00:00): Hello, again. So, I've went again to both stores, and if we take the trolleys used in so-called "hypermarkets" as reference, and classify these trolleys as "big"... In the first store (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/359658634) there are "small" size trolleys available, and in the second store (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3647434258) there are both "small" and "medium" size trolleys available. And, looking at the size of both stores, I would call them supermarkets (and not convenience stores). So yes, I consider the tag "shop=supermarket" more correct than the alternative "shop=convenience".
mikedld (2025-09-01 19:48:23+00:00): Thanks for checking, really appreciate it. I'll update my validation scripts (https://dld.sh/osm/pt/) to not enforce shop=convenience then.
renosmo (2025-09-04 03:11:29+00:00): Hello, again. The reason why "My Auchan" is considered a different chain, is certainly because "Auchan" (at least, here in Portugal) is usually a chain of so-called hypermarkets (like the one that exists at the local mall: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/485243343). And, these "My Auchan" stores are (much) smaller than Auchan's hypermarkets. So, the slightly different name is certainly a way to indirectly tell people not to expect these "My Auchan" stores to be regular Auchan stores (i.e. hypermarkets). But still, at least when it comes to the two stores I've visited again, I definitely wouldn't call them convenience stores, but supermarkets instead. (And, from my experience, I think that a good classification for these store's sizes would be something like: small = convenience store; medium, even if lower type of medium = supermarket; big, and very big = hypermarket. But, I see that the last term doesn't exist in OSM's tags.)
Sylabowy Kot (2025-09-18 11:56:25+00:00): What's the source of this information? What about the construction site? Polish community is very active so provide more reliable source than NONE.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-09-18 12:02:46+00:00): Reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172109107
Please do not map a specified areas abroud you country without knowing a context.
happilymappingrway (2025-09-19 02:29:38+00:00): I am sorry if I made a mistake. I recently visited Warsaw and I thought I was making the correct change because of the trees and benches in a relaxing social gathering space. Thank you for reverting this area based on your observation of the area. I wonder why the trees do not appear in the brown circular area.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-09-19 19:47:04+00:00): Oh, then sorry if you've seen thta lately.
rempshaener (2025-08-11 17:10:18+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.

Ich habe folgende Anmerkungen:
- Die Angabe von emergency:phone=112 ist eigentlich nur bei unmittelbar „notfallnahen“ Objekten sinnvoll: AED, Rettungspunkten etc. Bei einer Leitstelle ist die Angabe nicht sinnvoll.
- Du gibst selbst für die Quelle der Kontaktdaten 
https://www.ils-heilbronn.de/?p=leitstelle und https://www.ils-heilbronn.de/?p=kontakt an. Leider ist dort – und wenn es noch so seltsam und bürgerunfreundlich ist – der Hinweis „©2018 Integrierte Leitstelle Heilbronn“ angebracht. D. h. du hättest die Daten nicht übernehmen dürfen. Daher meine dringende Bitte, die Daten zeitnah wieder zu entfernen.
- Auch wenn das vorher schon da war: die Angabe von building=fire_station ist falsch.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
user_5359 (2025-08-13 09:32:46+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/566675175. What is the mean of the tag ыук = private? Did you mean access?
Elizen (2025-08-13 09:44:25+00:00): Hello!
Yes, it supposed to be an "access" but I see that there isn't any barrier here, so I deleted this tag.
Thanks for noticing.
rskedgell (2025-08-11 10:05:42+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I see that you've created a long unclassified highway around streets which have already been mapped, what is this intended to be?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1421503235

Also, "See Appendix 5 Mapping" - of what? And does it have a licence compatible with OSM?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright
BCNorwich (2025-08-11 13:27:36+00:00): Hi there and welcome.

The two highways you've added Way: Appendix 5 Mapping (1421503234) and Way: 1421503235, that join to several other features, cannot in any way be seen as highways nor would they be seen as highway areas. Thus to avoid confusion to routing I've removed the highway tags. The lines are left untagged for now in case there is a reason for their mapping. This is done in Changeset: 170293753.

If theres no response the linescan later be removed. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
Joe Fryd (2025-08-11 13:34:14+00:00): Bernard, 

My apologies, I was trying to use Open street as a mapping plot for a project and have obviously made a mistake and updated something that was meant for personal use as a public issue. Who can i liaise with to amend these details and return it to it previous form?
BCNorwich (2025-08-11 14:17:25+00:00): Hi, Thanks for responding so quickly. I've reverted everything back to the original state. So there's nothing to worry about now.

There are other editors lOSM, where changes/additions can be made to the OSM data and saved without uploading.

Regards Bernard.
zuicz (2025-08-11 22:26:28+00:00): Czy mógłbym prosić o spojrzenie na DW925 w Orzeszu? Wydaje mi się że mapa nie nadąża za zamknięciami
Tomek | Yanosik (2025-08-13 06:51:22+00:00): W Orzeszu na DW925 jest zamknięty odcinek od ronda Górnośląskiego do Urzędu Pocztowego. Planowane zamknięcie do 14.08 godz. 22:00
gendy54 (2025-08-12 14:17:39+00:00): Bonjour,

Je ne comprends pas pourquoi vous avez renommé la caserne des pompiers en Mairie.
Est-ce parce que la caserne a fermé et la mairie a repris le bâtiment ? ou parce que le corps des pompiers est communal ?

Merci de votre éclairage.
mairie de Marsonnas (2025-08-12 15:00:02+00:00): Bonjour, la caserne des pompiers est fermée et le bâtiment appartient à la commune. Mairie de Marsonnas
gendy54 (2025-08-12 15:07:37+00:00): ok. Du coup, dans le changement vous aviez juste changé le nom de la caserne de pompiers alors qu'il y aurait fallu la supprimer. Mais ce n'était pas possible avec cartes.app.

Je modifie tout ca. En revanche j'enlève le nom mairie car la mairie est déjà cartographiée et ce sont des garages.
AndreaDp271 (2025-08-11 12:28:47+00:00): Thank you for your contribution but try to make smaller changeset areas. 😉osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170282495
user_18023081 (2025-08-11 22:41:49+00:00): ???
Friendly_Ghost (2025-08-11 22:43:17+00:00): Thank you, Spaghetti Monster <3
Taya_S (2025-09-21 12:31:16+00:00): Reverted data copied from unauthorised sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172243199
trial (2025-08-12 20:09:47+00:00): Bonjour, pourquoi avoir supprimer une rue existante avec au moins une personne y ayant un téléphone :
https://www.pagesjaunes.fr/carte/particuliers?bloc_id=029765081900000000
kapazao (2026-01-18 15:59:17+00:00): Hola, el etiquetado que aplicaste a la vía no se corresponde con lo indicado en la noticia.

Si desconoces cómo etiquetar correctamente es recomendable que preguntes a otros usuarios con experiencia o que dejes alguna nota, pero hacerlo sin conocimiento genera problemas.

Esto no es una calle de acceso privado y ni siquiera la pusiste como peatonal o de plataforma única, que es la principal característica que destaca la noticia enlazada, por lo que no se entienden los cambios.
Lo he corregido.

Un saludo