piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
AlbertUnruh (2026-03-01 18:25:11+00:00): Moin, sehe ich richtig, dass du den Radweg wieder hinzugefügt hast in dem Änderungssatz?

Ich hatte ihn ursprünglich entfernt, da dieser nicht mehr existiert. (Liegt innerhalb einer Baustelle/abgerissen; die neue Brücken-/Straßenführung ist schon überschneidend vorgemerkt)

LG
sauerland-radfahrer (2026-03-02 09:13:59+00:00): upps, werde ich wieder korrigieren.
Radsportliche Grüße
sauerland-radfahrer (2026-03-02 09:19:25+00:00): Wird die Emslandroute und der Ems-Wanderweg derzeit am Kreisverkehr vorbei geleitet?
Oder gibt es eine Umleitungsstrecke?
AlbertUnruh (2026-03-02 09:25:17+00:00): Das habe ich noch nicht ganz rausfinden können. Inoffiziell würde die am Kreisverkehr Sinn ergeben.
Es würde mich aber nicht wundern, wenn es keine Umleitung dafür gibt, da es ja nur ein kleiner Radweg ist.

Im Sommer wird die Brücke (hoffentlich) fertiggestellt, womit das Straßennetz dort auch wieder geändert wird. Sind halt diese Umbauarbeiten, die keine wirklichen Alternativen/Aktualisierungen haben.
sauerland-radfahrer (2026-03-02 09:29:24+00:00): Ja, immer das gleiche Thema. Aber Radler, die die bisherige Route zum Navigieren nutzen, müssen ja keine große Umleitung in Kauf nehmen und können sich sicherlich vor Ort orientieren.
Viele Grüße ins Emsland.
AlbertUnruh (2026-03-02 09:34:56+00:00): Ich werde die Umleitung über den Kreisverkehr aber eben selbst einbinden, damit das Radnetz wieder intakt ist.
Auf der anderen Seite der Brücke habe ich auch schon eine Lücke eingebaut, da der Weg auch nicht mehr existiert.

Im Sommer kann es dann nochmal überarbeitet werden, *wenn* das Projekt mal fertig ist...
pedr0faria (2026-02-24 22:31:16+00:00): I already deleted it. It was a mistake. sorry
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178941443
K4rleak (2026-06-12 10:04:45+00:00): revert z důvodu špatné kvality

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184009088
007Transformer (2026-02-25 16:12:28+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179044499
marc__marc (2026-03-24 12:47:44+00:00): Hello,
thanks for those improvements.
palm isn't a specie, it is the english value for the taxon=Arecaceae
taxon:en=Palm
Regards,
Marc
RJ Lerng (2026-03-28 20:08:28+00:00): Thank you very much for pointing it out for me! I realise now that palm is just a common name, not a botanical name. I have downloaded the Flora Incognita app and hope that it could help me identify the trees more accurately. -- RJ
K4rleak (2026-06-12 09:34:43+00:00): viz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178941742#c1610828
K4rleak (2026-06-12 10:08:20+00:00): revert z důvodu špatné kvality

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184009263
K4rleak (2026-06-12 09:33:22+00:00): Dobrý den, natural=peak se používá pro vrchol hory nebo kopce. Pro vyhlídku se používa  tourism=viewpoint a lavička se značí jako samostatná druhá věc. Když si nejste jistí doporučuji ověřit tag na wiki. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:natural=peak?uselang=cs
Vrchol hory jménem lavička umístěný v poli teda považuju za chybku, je to tak? Prosím o upřesnění místa. Kdyžtak smažu. Díky
FajrAl (2026-02-26 13:56:21+00:00): Tidak bisa asal impor data dari sumber yang tidak dicantumkan dan penjelasan lisensi datanya. Ikuti petunjuk osm.wiki/Import. Perubahanmu sudah dibalikkan oleh tim DWG.
Aroru (2026-02-27 16:36:32+00:00): Maaf karena melakukan impor terlalu instan, lain kali akan saya ikuti petunjuk
Sanniu (2026-03-02 15:28:48+00:00): Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1482203376 has no tags, can you add appropriate tags?
K4rleak (2026-06-12 09:45:14+00:00): Opět, mám podezření že se zde nenachází "zvláštní cesta vyhrazená pro cyklisty". Pokud se zde nachází pěší cestička kde mohou jet kola je potřeba to tak značit. Zároveň name se používá pro oficialní jména, na mapě to potom totiž působí zmateně. Pro místní název se používa loc_name
K4rleak (2026-06-12 09:04:22+00:00): Dobrý den, pokud vím, tak zde úplně park není. Podle osm a vlastní zkušenosti je zde jenom odpad ze stavby, změnilo se něco?
K4rleak (2026-06-12 09:19:29+00:00): *podle orthophoto ne osm
SafwatHalaby (2026-02-23 12:57:51+00:00): Due to time constraints this work is likely not perfect and is only an incremental improvement.

I removed some personal bookmarks.

I removed some descriptive names, transferring them to either descriptions or more specific tags.

I made some other minor fixes such as typo fixes / removing emojis / etc.
Yanivdu (2026-05-17 11:01:55+00:00): Hi
you have made a chang to סלע השטן from tourism=attraction to Boulder.
This change removed it from IHM as they do not show Boulders in there Rander.
Please change it back as this is a unique remote and hiden site worth visiting - please change it back to tourism=attraction
SafwatHalaby (2026-07-04 08:21:53+00:00): Hello!

I understand your concern, but tagging for the renderer is bad OSM practice: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

I personally think these boulders are a good fit for IHM. If the IHM guys are interested in boulders appearing on the map, they should update their code so that boulders are included. If they are not interested in boulders appearing on the map, then everything is working properly.


This happens with many other tags. For example some people tag עגלות קפה as tourism=attraction and when I fix those, they disappear from IHM. In general IHM is problematic with the "tourism=attraction" tag and it's used as a generic bin for everything. I've had a few discussions with IHM/Zstadler about that but no clear resolution was reached.
SafwatHalaby (2026-07-04 08:22:31+00:00): Typo fix: Harel M / zstadler
SafwatHalaby (2026-07-04 08:41:38+00:00): A few more pointers:

1. You might have success with a pull request. A while back I've done this with tourism=artwork - when I changed those to tourism=statue it disappeared from IHM, and the IHM guys happily fixed it: https://github.com/IsraelHikingMap/Site/issues/2156

2. If you're more ambitious you might want to map *all* of these occurrences (I don't think there are many problematic cases) and report them.

Basically the pattern is: For every feature that is deemed relevant to the end user on IHM, IHM should consume the specific tags and not just the generic one.
SafwatHalaby (2026-07-04 08:50:08+00:00): Sorry. Minor correction: I misremembered the exact details of the tourism=artwork case. It was slightly different that what I described here but the general points hold.
Harel M (2026-07-04 12:39:51+00:00): @SafwatHalaby please note that while tourism=attraction is overloaded, in some places, like this one, I believe it's worth keeping both tags: boulder and attraction. The face that you add a more specific and better representing tag does not mean it's not a place tourists should visit, if they happen to be nearby. 
I agree that עגלות קפה are not a tourist attraction and they do appear in the bike base map, best to other restaurants in Mapeak/IHM.
SafwatHalaby (2026-07-04 13:56:50+00:00): I generally agree that in some cases tourism=attraction is justified alongside the more specific tag. 

But is there anything special about that specific boulder סלע השטן (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9197188592)?

For example, please compare it to:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1064563108

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10211513517

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1064563167

I think either they all warrant tourism=attraction (if so, why?), or they all do not.
Harel M (2026-07-04 14:19:52+00:00): I'm not familiar with all of them, but the third one (as far as I understand) is definitely a tourist attraction given the fact that it's presented in the Timna's brochure. 
I would advise to remove tourist attraction tags if you've been there and know for a fact there's nothing worth visiting in the relevant point and not the other way around. 
In this context, the second point might be this type of candidate, although I'm not 100% sure as I haven't been there and have little knowledge of this place.
If people spend the time to upload an image and add a description good chances it is a tourist attraction so I wouldn't hurry to remove that tag.
SafwatHalaby (2026-07-12 14:56:45+00:00): Since I have no strong opinion on boulders in particular and my goal was to cleanup obvious tourism=attraction issues, I will re-add tourism=attraction for all boulders that seem notable or whose removal of tourism=attraction might be controversial.

Sound good?
Harel M (2026-07-12 15:22:55+00:00): Yup! Thanks!
Note that there's another user who's actively fixes tourist attractions in Israel nowadays.
SafwatHalaby (2026-07-12 15:39:42+00:00): Who?
Harel M (2026-07-12 15:57:32+00:00): Hatul I believe
Harel M (2026-07-12 15:58:21+00:00): See feature request here: 
https://github.com/IsraelHikingMap/Site/issues/2582
eggie (2026-02-23 12:53:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Is 'thuis' echt de werkelijke geografische naam van deze steiger?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-23 12:57:18+00:00): name=steiger thuis heb ik verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
MihaelIvanjek (2026-02-23 18:21:42+00:00): Reverting the entire changeset as the surface tags were deleted on accident #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178956254
MappingMore (2026-02-23 12:56:59+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:178942409
cronoser (2026-02-24 00:50:38+00:00): Hello James, I have seen that you're editing near my shire, if it is possible please add more accuracy (more nodes) and typology to the tracks to avoid adding it later. Best regards.
eggie (2026-02-23 13:18:43+00:00): Thomas,

Lijkt me oke.
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=83764.35&geometry.y=412855.96&zoomlevel=9.73

MVG
eggie
felipeeugenio (2026-02-23 13:05:55+00:00): Nota resuelta #5177620
Tatfahren (2026-02-23 14:06:08+00:00): Where does it say that the tag is not valid? I can't see you replaced it by something else used more often or that is documented.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like
Hypsometric (2026-02-23 17:50:11+00:00): Thanks for that link. That is new to me (or I forgot).

I did some looking around. There is no wiki info for finely_mown=* and it is used sporadically. It seems to be the same as grass=finely_mown which has more use and more closely matches other tagging schemas.

Thoughts on me going through this changeset to add grass=finely_mown where finely_mown=* was used?
kitsee (2026-02-23 18:15:55+00:00): i agree that it makes sense to replace `finely_mown=yes` with `grass=finely_mown` however such a automated change should have been discussed on the forums at a very minimum. This obviously goes against the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
Hypsometric (2026-02-23 22:11:58+00:00): Thanks for the info. I took this as a blatant fix that would not need discussion. Knowing about the "Any tags you like" will change how I treat obscure tags like this in the future.
kitsee (2026-02-23 22:24:27+00:00): this is not a "blatant fix", a blatant fix would be a single letter typo. a blatant fix could even be be `house=yes` (1.7k uses) to `building=house`(65.5m uses). `finely_mown=yes`(1k uses) vs `grass=finely_mown`
kitsee (2026-02-23 22:26:19+00:00): (hit enter by mistake)

This is not a "blatant fix", a blatant fix would be a single letter typo. a blatant fix could even be be `house=yes` (1.7k uses) to `building=house`(65.5m uses). `finely_mown=yes`(1k uses) vs `grass=finely_mown` (2.5k uses) is a alternative tagging convention and NEEDS discussion before changing on mass. `grass=finely_mown` has even been in decline in recent years.
kitsee (2026-02-23 22:41:38+00:00): I realize now that I've made a bit of an error and misunderstood this changeset. I thought this was a replacement of `finely_mown=yes` to `grass=finely_mown` rather than `surface=grass`.  so do disregard my last comment. I still say the same that this should have been discussed before hand just go give other users a opportunity to protest before the change is executed.
Hypsometric (2026-02-23 23:11:09+00:00): Further discussion at
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/golf-features-tagged-incorrectly-according-to-the-wiki-and-obscure-tags/141786
Laell (2026-02-26 07:30:30+00:00): Gud
InsertUser (2026-03-04 02:37:56+00:00): Has this un-discussed automated edit been reverted yet?
NeisBot (2026-02-23 13:15:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/10957072755 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cleaning service"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-03 17:33:05+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179314296
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-02-23 13:15:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13592822201 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Shark oddasi sedir"
---
Örneğin metnin daha nötr ve gerçek bir versiyonu şöyle olabilir: "Köpekbalığı tuhafları sedir"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-03 17:33:06+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179024054
amosharper (2026-02-23 14:49:02+00:00): Whoops, looks like this touched one of the members of the Hastings/St Leonards residential area multipolygon - sorry for large bounding box.
Aurelien1685 (2026-07-16 09:39:46+00:00): Bonjour, 

Est-ce qu'avoir nommé cette prairie "Boite aux lettres" est une erreur ?
Joram (2026-07-18 16:49:07+00:00): Oui, c'est une erreur, car en plus je ne travaille pas du tout sur ce secteur.
eggie (2026-02-23 14:45:37+00:00): Dag Thom,

footway heb ik omgezet naar steps. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-23 14:46:46+00:00): Loopt hier nu nog een parallelvoetpad dat nog niet op de kaart staat?
Thom_La (2026-02-23 15:12:53+00:00): Ik zie nu dat er nog een deel voetpad ontbreekt, zal ik nog toevoegen!
eggie (2026-02-23 15:15:44+00:00): Tuurlijk. Daar is nogal wat veranderd.
👍
eggie (2026-02-23 15:19:18+00:00): Ik zie dat het noordelijk fietspad op slot staat met access=no  Klopt dat nog wel? en het zuidelijke fietspad zie ik niet op de luchtfoto?
eggie (2026-02-23 15:20:38+00:00): Foto van deze week https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@53.40751,6.197834,18/?datastrip=20260218_SVNEO-02&sensorname=SuperView-NEO
Thom_La (2026-02-23 15:33:45+00:00): Noordelijke fietspad is nu het officiële fietspad, dus die hoort public te zijn :-)
eggie (2026-02-23 15:36:08+00:00): Oke.. dan kan access=no eraf. Het zal ander niet routeren.
Ik weet niet tot hoever dat al gepend is?
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-23 15:26:39+00:00): Fixed truck route based on street signs: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178948734 #OptimoRoute
eggie (2026-02-23 14:48:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
onterof (2026-03-23 20:04:19+00:00): Hallo, ein paar Kleinigkeiten:
Zahlen werden mit Punkt nicht Komma als Trennzeichen formatiert.
Vestas V162-6,2 ist eher keine ref, sondern Hersteller 'manufacturer' und das Anlagenmodel 'model' (wird normal getrennt erfasst).
Stillgelegte/abgebaute Anlagen direkt zu löschen kann man machen, aber solange die noch im Luftbild zu sehen sind, ist oft die Verwendung von life-cycle tags (removed:*) zu empfehlen, um fälschlichem, erneutem Hinzfügen vorzubeugen. 
Grüße
uvi (2026-03-01 08:53:54+00:00): Hallo Trayo612, du hast hier als einzige Änderung die Rufnummer vom internationalen zum nationalen Format geändert. Das ist nicht richtig. Rufnummern bitte immer im Internationalen Format angeben!! Bitte wieder ändern.
VG Uwe
NeisBot (2026-02-23 14:03:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 62 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/465314993 v9 | 22 crossings
https://osm.org/way/667347127 v6 | 20 crossings
https://osm.org/way/760563407 v2 | 16 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7105056902 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178945420
NeisRevert (2026-02-23 15:57:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178950192
where the comment is: "🔄 Revert of unintended geometry change"
Ziemowit Zabawa (2026-05-04 19:59:43+00:00): Droga nr 197710166 jeszcze nie jest właściwą DK7. Wjeżdżając z ronda na tą drogę to właśnie tutaj można zdecydować, czy się wjeżdża na DK7, czy na S8 z całkowitym pominięciem DK7 (bo tak jest, jak się użyje prawego pasa). Tym bardziej to widać na drodze nr 450667686, gdzie dosłownie nie da się wjechać z łącznicy S8 na DK7, bo prawy pas jest oddzielony od reszty linią ciągłą.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182221750
NeisBot (2026-02-23 14:06:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13592916949 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Apartment building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-03 17:33:09+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179314299
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-02-23 14:09:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13592981940 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "The Cistern Dance Hall"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-03 17:33:10+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179314300
(No visible changes after review)
Yunan973 (2026-02-24 12:04:32+00:00): Bonjour,
tu as remplacé une ligne par une surface, j'imagine pour faire suite au warning de l'éditeur iD sur les boundary=political.
Sache qu'il ne faut pas tenir compte de ce warning qui est erroné : une frontière doit être un polygone fermé mais pas forcément d'une seule ligne.
J'ai tout corrigé.
Cordialement.
Veterini (2026-02-24 13:38:15+00:00): Bonjour,
effectivement j'ai parfois ce message que j'ignore habituellement. J'ai du aller trop vite cette fois ci.
Merci à toi pour la correction
Caerandir (2026-03-04 09:48:05+00:00): Hallo Herr Skiba,
beim Pflegen der OSM-Daten nach meinen Wanderungen stieß ich auf den militärischen Gefahrenbereich "Expeditio Magistri Venatorum" - im Internet konnte ich dazu sonst nichts finden, darum aus Neugier: Können Sie mir sagen, was es damit auf sich hat? 
Viele Dank & Viele Grüße
Hauke Voß
Robert Skiba (2026-03-04 22:48:03+00:00): Hallo Herr Voß, 

bitte entschuldigen Sie diesen falschen Eintrag, dieser wurde während Corona mal scherzhaft angelegt. Gerne können Sie ihn mal auf Deutsch übersetzen! 
Ich werde ihn entfernen.
Caerandir (2026-03-05 08:18:05+00:00): Ah, verstehe :-) Ich vermutete ein altes Römerlager oder so... Ich hoffe, die Expedition war erfolgreich! :-)
NeisBot (2026-02-23 14:12:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13582666436 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Clothing store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-03 17:33:11+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179314301
(No visible changes after review)
McKulkin (2026-03-29 22:27:01+00:00): Hi. I'm questioning the existence of this trail. You probably followed the sign pointing toward the water source (oddly, in '25, the sign arrow pointed right into the deep forest with no visible path in sight). I'm wondering: 1) Do you remember the exact location of that signpost? 2) Are you certain the path you took was the correct one? It seems more reasonable to follow the contour line from the trail west of the spring rather than zig-zagging down from the top. Unfortunately, when we passed the sign, I didn't mark the coordinates or try to decipher the layout - but there was definitely no trail in sight as we were looking for water. Thanks!
NeisBot (2026-02-23 14:18:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13583438337 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Window tinting shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-03 17:33:12+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179314302
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-02-23 14:21:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13585738444 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Floor covering store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-03 17:33:12+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179314303
(No visible changes after review)