piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tomcat9 (2025-05-17 15:19:42+00:00): Yes, I changed it intentionally.
Because there are no natural forests, just planted trees and pedestrian paths.
Also a litto part of a local street that were wrong
ilias_ (2025-05-11 00:56:16+00:00): Did you delete the bridge by mistake? The road is not connected now
windmaker (2025-05-11 19:49:38+00:00): I tried to fix the routing problem. My last try was to delete the segment and set a new bridge. It seems to be correct now, but I realised the routing data needs to be recalculated before osm will navigate over this bridge again, right?
watmildon (2025-05-10 23:41:17+00:00): Love to add a map to the map!

It seems a good number of us got some good editing in. https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/23SB
pyrog (2026-04-07 07:36:46+00:00): Hi Mario,

Sometime you used information=route_sign instead of information=route_marker.

Probably a mistake.

Best regards,
Yves
MarinoBM (2026-04-07 11:34:02+00:00): Hi pyrog, I see that the `route_sign` tag has very few uses. I've changed the ones in the zone to `route_marker` and I'll review the rest.

Thanks for the heads-up.
Regards.
Valérie Tardif (2025-05-10 22:58:00+00:00): mauvaise description, devrait être: "troittoirs, passages"
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-24 16:47:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/757341656/history  gdzie te pozostałości zostały i zobaczyć można?
wolfbert (2026-06-18 18:23:47+00:00): Was hat es denn mit addr:streetname auf sich? Der Straßenname steht i.A. in addr:street.
lakedistrict (2025-05-11 08:51:07+00:00): Hi, what's your source for Carlisle being operated by Scotrail? The National Rail website and Wikipedia both have Avanti as the operator, which seemed to be the case last time I was there.
DaveF (2025-05-12 16:19:39+00:00): Thanks for spotting that & letting me know. I misinterpreted another wiki page. Should be fixed now.
ljb_nj (2025-05-11 00:18:37+00:00): Hi, I thought I fixed this in 2024 but now I'm not sure what happened. Be aware: there is no shower here. There used to be toilets, showers, and laundry but now only toilets, with the rest boarded up. The building has restrooms only, to accomodate campers, and is scheduled to be demolished and rebuilt. I will fix this in another changeset.
wombatmaper (2025-05-11 11:18:56+00:00): ok great thanks!
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:58:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:56:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
whammo (2025-07-31 00:59:47+00:00): Reverted because of vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169746325
mueschel (2025-05-11 16:47:07+00:00): Hi,
could you check this parking? "maxstay" should be a time, not a price.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1383240422
Lieckio (2025-05-11 17:24:56+00:00): Hey, thank you! Must have been an error in the script, that is odd tagging indeed. Will change!
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:56:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:53:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:59:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:00:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:00:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:59:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:53:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
MxxCon (2025-05-12 20:53:30+00:00): Hello.
Please note that name_1= is an invalid tag and should never be used. we have name=, alt_name=, official_name=, and many other documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names.
But any tag that's in the format of _1= or _2=, etc are incorrect.
Please update your changes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166090178
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:54:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:58:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:59:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:56:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:00:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:00:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
MxxCon (2025-05-12 20:54:25+00:00): Hello.
There's no need to update tiger:*= tags. They are leftover from the original data import and not used for anything else. They can even be deleted.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166090355
Jarek 🚲 (2025-05-11 01:06:51+00:00): Well, low-rise except for the tower on College, that is...
MxxCon (2025-05-12 20:58:13+00:00): Hello.
Please do not put feature's description as its name.
Additionally, amenity=fixme is an invalid tag.
Finally, this area is already mapped as a construction site. There's no need to add duplicate data.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166091095
Robin Zyx (2025-05-12 22:24:00+00:00): That update seems to have be a change that I entered in the Every Door app a couple months ago but which was not pushed to OSM until a day or ago. That app and I do not get on well.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166091095
MxxCon (2025-05-13 00:00:22+00:00): After you make a changes in EveryDoor, there's upload button in the lower left corner. It doesn't automatically upload your changes.👍
MxxCon (2025-05-12 20:59:30+00:00): Hello.
This feature is already tagged as disused:shop=e-cigarette, there's no need to add shop=vacant.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166091096
Robin Zyx (2025-05-12 22:27:05+00:00): Again, this seems to  change that I entered in the Every Door app a some time ago but which was not pushed to OSM until a day or ago.
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:59:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:02:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:55:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:57:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
A Hall (2026-04-07 17:50:09+00:00): Hi boulter! Just curious what materials you have reviewed that suggest that leaving trails DISCONNECTED is the preferred method of mapping ski resorts? I've reviewed a lot of documentation and haven't been able to find any documentation for that. Further, it feels like its contrary to what OSM is supposed to be, a representation of the world as we interact with it. By disconnected trails, it seems to imply that the trail just...ends. There's no way to move on from the terminus of a trail. Any navigation apps that exist or may be developed would be useless, as it wouldn't be able to instruct a user how to get from one trail to the next, or from one trail to the next lift. Additionally, I've seen this pitfall in the past, just because the Okemo trial map lines don't connect, does not mean we should not connect them. The Okemo trail map is a copyrighted artistic rendering of their resort. It should not be a goal for OSM to look exactly like their map. I've seen instances where the official trail map of a resort is incorrect, and OSM's guidance is for 'ground truthing', or mapping what actually exists on the ground. 

Thanks for reading! I'm looking forward to learning from you the perspective/reasoning for the edits.
boulter (2026-04-13 01:15:18+00:00): Hi there. Honestly I don't remember why I disconnected them. Perhaps it's because it's a little hard to tell where one trail ends and another begins at these intersections. I just submitted an edit to connect them where possible.
tastrax (2025-05-11 08:23:15+00:00): FYI - we are able to use LIST Data for addresses. Its available as a background layer as well (LIST Topographic)
Rowan_AU (2025-05-11 08:50:07+00:00): I've been adding addresses because OrganicMaps doesn't show addresses unless they are added in OSM via either an address point or added as the address of the building feature.
tastrax (2025-05-11 11:05:44+00:00): If you have an interest in a particular area just let me know and I I will also add some addresses in the area
Rowan_AU (2025-05-11 11:24:31+00:00): Thanks for the offer, I appreciate it. I've mostly been focusing on Ballarat, Victoria. I'm just doing some addresses in Tasmania while I'm travelling. I've started on a few areas, completed any that I needed so I've been also completing more addresses for buildings surrounding those areas when I have time. I would certainly like to see more addresses available when navigating in Organic Maps but I know that its a lot of work even just to get a single area done.
dknelson9876 (2025-05-13 03:46:21+00:00): Hi truemarmalade, I'm not sure you're using access=yes correctly. Tagging sidewalks this way means that *any* mode of transport is allowed to use this sidewalk, including motor vehicles, which is not true. My first guess of your intention is that you mean to indicate that there is public access to these sidewalks for walking, which is already implied by highway=footway and therefore there is no need for an access tag. If there are signs indicating that bicyclists should also use the sidewalk, then you could add foot=yes and bicycle=yes, but I don't expect this to be the case.
truemarmalade (2025-05-13 04:00:16+00:00): Ah yes you are correct! I only meant to add bicycles, did not think it would also add cars. Appreciate the comment I will be mindful of this in the future.
recrayon (2025-05-11 05:29:13+00:00): wrong cs comment

should be color=* to colour=*
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-12 21:39:19+00:00): שלום, תודה על התרומה שלכם למפה!

נראה שהוספתם אתר פיקניק במקום שלא ממופים אליו שבילים, וגם לא רואים את אתר הפיקניק בתמונות לווין. האם יש שם שולחנות לפיקנית או שזאת טעות במיפוי?
Eladush (2025-05-14 17:04:45+00:00): מדובר באתר פיקניק חדש שהוקם לפני שנה לזכר נרצחת הנובה אביה גנוט ז"ל תושבת היישוב צופים
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-14 21:12:25+00:00): תודה רבה על העדכון. מומלץ אבל לא חובה גם להוסיף שם\תיאור\צילום לאתר הפיקניק. ניתן לעשות את זה ממפת הטיולים ממנה הוספתם את האתר מלכתחילה.

אפשר גם למפות את השביל שמוביל אליו. דרך https://www.openstreetmap.org/ , מכיוון שאין תצלום לווין שמראה את השביל בבירור  תצטרכו לזהות התוואי, או לחלופין אפשר גם להקליט מסלול GPS מהטלפון ולהשתמש בו להוספת השביל. 

אם יש שאלות, תרגיש חופשי
b-jazz (2025-05-12 22:44:10+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385495878

Hello Rick,
The lines that define fairways, greens, bunkers, water hazards, and tees should never intersect or partially overlap each other and we noticed that they are overlapping in one or more of the feature pairs in this changeset. If there is no obvious fringe around the green, the fairway should butt up against the green and every node between them should be *shared*. If there is a fringe around the green that is similar to the fairway, the fairway should extend around the green and the two objects should be merged together into a multipolygon (See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon for how to create them with your map editor).  Please read the wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions, please reply here and I'll gladly help clarify things. Thanks!
NeisBot (2025-05-17 15:10:18+00:00): Hi rickdagolfer, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 5 natural(s)
- 5 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=166093762
NeisReview (2025-05-18 09:58:47+00:00): #golf #mapping
user_5359 (2025-05-12 12:55:38+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/12791180952 (one of four objects). What ist the mean of the key nete (did you mean note)?
あじさか (2025-05-12 13:03:23+00:00): Yes, that’s a typo — it should be note, not nete.
Thanks a lot for pointing it out! I’ll fix it right away.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-11 07:10:55+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12827790831
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403010417

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Sandmann4u (2025-05-11 09:09:28+00:00): Hi, that was a Problem in Previous Data, i fixed.
osmviborg (2025-05-11 08:19:48+00:00): Hvorfor tagge en tre meter bred asfalteret vej som 'path'? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Tag:highway=path?uselang=da
Esbern (2025-05-11 08:45:10+00:00): Banestien er en sti mellem Båring og Brenderup der går på den nedlagte jernbane. Stien er en del af Middelfart kommunes stiplan. På netop det sted her er der ved at blive lavet trapper og cykeltilkørsel mellem stien og Kærbyholmvej, men endnu ikke færdigt. Stien er ikke specielt en cykelsti, men der må gerne cykles på den og der er ved at blive sat lys op. Stien ligner for det meste https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/08/Urban_path_to_Tanker_Hill_-_geograph.org.uk_-_3357538.jpg/140px-Urban_path_to_Tanker_Hill_-_geograph.org.uk_-_3357538.jpg.
Dit forrige argument med at man ikke kan se den gamle jernbane er ok fra Brenderup og ud til Vejrupvej, men derefter er det tydeligt at det er den gamle jernbane.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-29 15:41:58+00:00): Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4882137 ?

Looks like an unfinished edit, likely caused by https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/909
TheNightRider (2025-05-11 07:39:12+00:00): Went over 256 chars on changeset note. Continue here: Added ele, opening_hours, parking:fee, start_date
aharvey (2025-05-12 00:03:14+00:00): Thanks!
dieterdreist (2025-10-03 13:38:26+00:00): Hi, thank you for your contribution, but the feature was already in the map, please avoid creating duplicates, thank you!
watmildon (2025-07-29 04:17:27+00:00): Some of the buildings here and in another part of NZ now have building:levels=9999 which should be reviewed. Presumably from whatever data source you used?
watmildon (2025-07-29 06:44:18+00:00): Whoops. Obviously I mean in Japan. New Zealand seems fine. Sorry for that mix up. Worth getting these addressed.
MAPconcierge (2025-07-29 11:25:35+00:00): Thanks for your mentions!
We have already fixed our CityGML to OSM importer. And we will modify 9999 errors immediately. 
https://github.com/yuuhayashi/citygml-osm/issues/128
MAPconcierge (2025-07-29 11:52:14+00:00): There are some similar errors(13 Relations). We will fix it soon. Thanks for your mentions!
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/28Ke
watmildon (2025-07-29 22:48:39+00:00): Wonderful! keep up the great work!
hayashi (2025-08-02 01:35:09+00:00): Thank you everyone
Frans S (2025-05-27 10:20:39+00:00): Hello again
Here you make it yourself difficult.
Just map here 3 rectangular buildings rather than following the visible rooflines. The Imagery is taken from a certain angle, so your view is a bit confusing.
Check this page 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385515599/history#map=19/19.739199/96.223167
Best regards
TrickyFoxy (2026-05-12 12:57:10+00:00): Не удаляйте всё подряд, что вам мешает. Линии которые вы поудалили были частями мультиполгинов.

https://osm.wiki/RU:Отношения:мультиполигон
XtnW (2025-05-11 12:15:48+00:00): Ich habe einen weiteren Versuch unternommen, den Unterschied zwischen Skirouten und Skipisten zu verdeutlichen. Diesmal durch Änderung der Namen. Ich würde gerne hören, warum Sie dies wieder ändern.
XtnW (2025-05-11 12:27:07+00:00): Wenn Sie das nicht für eine gute Lösung halten, können wir die Namen auch anpassen, wie es in Galtür und Silvretta Montafon gemacht wurde. Bei den Skirouten steht vor der Pistennummer bei "ref" ein "R" (Beispielsweise R177 statt 177). Sagen Sie mir Bescheid, wenn Sie das für eine gute Idee halten.
StantonPfarri25 (2025-05-11 19:50:06+00:00): Hallo nochmals, ich habe es jetzt bei allen Skirouten nochmals abgeändert, sodass die Pistennummer nichtmehr doppelt angezeigt wird!
XtnW (2025-05-12 08:13:57+00:00): Danke, schöne Lösung!
StantonPfarri25 (2025-05-12 14:44:46+00:00): Jetzt müssten wir bei den Seilbahnen und Pisten noch die Relation "Ski Arlberg" eintragen
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-11 09:16:51+00:00): Hello. Thank you for your edit!

According to the naming guidelines in Israel, the "name" tag should have been Hebrew. You should add the English name to `name:en`. You can see the guidelines here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#Naming
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-11 09:31:01+00:00): Names were corrected here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166099932
eggie (2025-05-11 09:33:25+00:00): Hoi,

Je was een keer forward vergeten op dat stuk hoofdrijbaan en de volgorde klopte niet van de delen.
Maar het is lastif als zo'n role ontbreekt om te zien wat er verkeerd is, want je kan dan schuiven wat je wil in het relatiescherm, maar je krijgt het dan toch niet goed. Dus steeds kijken of er een role=.... forward of backward nodig is.

Groet
eggie
eggie (2025-05-11 09:37:32+00:00): Om het fietsverkeer naar het fietspad te dwingen tag ik altijd (in dit geval) bicycle:backward=use_sidepath, maar zo zal het ook werken.
CPK-PrB (2025-05-11 09:37:39+00:00): Die richting had ik al geprobeerd, maar de volgorde is nu inderdaad anders.

Blijft een beetje onduidelijke materie.

Dank voor het recht zetten!

Mvg, CPK-PrB.
eggie (2025-05-11 09:42:36+00:00): Yep... zodra het splitst wordt het lastig. Dus veel doen...  Voor mij ook weer een goede oefening. 
Fijne dag
eggie (2025-05-11 10:07:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-05-11 09:18:17+00:00): Kees... Lijkt me oke zo.
Gr eggie
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2025-05-11 17:21:27+00:00): The node at correct address already exists. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12828050019

Node with Riisipere as an address has no place in Tallinn. Please delete it.
gipps75 (2025-07-06 22:38:09+00:00): Thanks for adding these.
s1kk4z (2025-07-30 07:10:48+00:00): Glad you liked.  Cheers. JS.
bartgron (2025-05-11 20:00:24+00:00): Niestety te budynki są dalej widoczne w ewidencji budynków i na zdjęciach lotniczych. Wycofam tą edycję i zamienię tagi tak żeby budynki były jako wyburzone
richlv (2025-05-12 19:20:29+00:00): Sounds great, thank you for the contributions.

Given that Vārpu iela is living_street, it seems highly likely that Vasaras iela is the same. Is that correct?

Additionally, you're very welcome to discuss things in the OSM Latvian community chat, https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
ctrnz (2025-05-13 03:59:22+00:00): Yes, that's correct - it is living street (residential area).
richlv (2025-05-13 08:53:47+00:00): Thanks, I've changed it - although afterwards I wondered whether you would have preferred to change it yourself.
In such a case, hopefully there are some other unmapped things nearby :)
ctrnz (2025-05-14 17:08:48+00:00): All good! And thanks for all the input and help!
wolfgang8 (2025-05-12 07:38:56+00:00): Hallo haidanos,

der "Goldegger Bach" ist laut mehreren Quellen ein rechter Zubringer zum "Watzelsdorfer Bach".

siehe z.B.

https://www.bmluk.gv.at/dam/jcr:33699a3d-88fd-4dbc-8081-4d28c80f83bc/Beitrag%2062.pdf
(Seite 53)

und

https://atlas.noe.gv.at/atlas/portal/noe-atlas/map/_sharedmaps/0xE9A6226FC939D1441077F4310C4AC9AB8A5812808BFDDCE5EE88D5DA76074183
(NÖ-Atlas mit basmap Hintergrund)

Und auch auf dieser Wiki-Seite wird der "Watzelsdorfer Bach" als Zubringer zum "Kremnitzbach" genannt.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kremnitzbach
wolfgang8 (2025-05-15 18:07:42+00:00): revertiert mit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166317640
Luzandro (2025-05-23 17:57:32+00:00): ganz so klar dürfte es aber auch nicht sein, immerhin gibt es in Gabersdorf eine Goldeggerbach Brücke oder in Watzelsdorf die Goldeggerbachstraße
wolfgang8 (2025-05-23 18:45:35+00:00): Könnte natürlich auch sein, dass der Bach unter beiden Namen bekannt ist - das wäre dann ein Fall für name+alt_name. Hatte gehofft, dass sich @haidanos auf meinen Kommentar hin meldet, um die Situation aufzuklären.
wolfgang8 (2025-06-03 14:25:17+00:00): Ich hab jetzt noch etwas recherchiert und den "Watzelsdorfer Bach" auch im "Verzeichnis der Einzugsgebiete der NÖ Wildbäche" gefunden - dort wird als Vulgoname "Goldegger Bach" angegeben.

https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/Landesnormen/LNO40024465/Anlage.pdf

Auch in den beiden Bezirksblatt Artikeln wird der "Goldeggerbach" genannt. 

https://www.meinbezirk.at/st-poelten/c-lokales/baeume-rund-um-schloss-goldegg-sind-weg_a2439431
https://www.meinbezirk.at/st-poelten/c-reisen/eine-sonntagswanderung-von-st-poelten-auf-den-dunkelstein_a3840132

Zusammen mit dem ursprünglichen CS-Kommentar und der "Goldeggerbachstraße" (für "Goldeggerbach Brücke" konnte ich keine Belege finden) hab ich den Eindruck, dass "Goldegger Bach" doch der häufiger verwendete Name ist. Ich würde daher vorschlagen, als name "Goldegger Bach" und als alt_name "Watzelsdorfer Bach" einzutragen.
wolfgang8 (2025-06-10 13:44:53+00:00): So wie vorgeschlagen umgesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167445541
bartgron (2025-05-11 20:04:26+00:00): Nazwa jest już dodana do terenu szkoły i nie ma potrzeby dublowania jej na budynku
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-02 10:21:43+00:00): Hello!

You used
electrified=now
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96189606/history

Have you maybe meant
electrified=no
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
❤️‍🔥 (2025-12-20 11:31:50+00:00): hey mateusz, yes it's a typo, fixed now
user_20546205 (2025-05-11 14:45:00+00:00): 这条路根据实际的卫星图，新建的道路为双向两车道，并且使用虚线做车道分隔。再结合这是一条通往景点的路。结合实际的技术标准和道路功能选用的三级道路等级。