piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BlaueBlüte (2024-05-31 19:03:47+00:00): mostly based on a (non-precision/non-GPS) survey; the changeset would probably have qualified for source=survey

This is fairly new construction; cf. https://new.mta.info/press-release/mta-opens-new-ramps-connecting-randalls-island-queens-and-manhattan-robert-f-kennedy

Bing imagery actually seems to be from when this was under construction, with foundations for the new exit ramp already visible at the locations of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11939017634/history/1 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11939017635/history/1 and vegetation appearing already cleared in the alignment of the new entrance ramp https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1287299166/history/1
tastrax (2024-05-30 06:07:19+00:00): Hi Folks – Unit numbers should be added to addr:unit key rather than combined with the addr:housenumber key. I have just updated a recent edit you made. Cheers
Pakenhamin (2024-06-14 23:38:31+00:00): I only just found out about this tag yesterday.  Thanks.
OTNoblat (2024-05-28 07:40:15+00:00): erreur sur le site internet, celui-ci est le bon : https://mairie-stpaul87.fr/
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-28 08:16:45+00:00): "Great work on your mapping. I found some unintentional errors which are crossing barrier/ highway, way end node near other highway, way terminates on area. Otherwise, it looks good.
Keep contributing, Cheers! "
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151930345
Mason F (2024-06-02 06:07:42+00:00): Thanks!

Any advice on how to avoid making the errors you found?
OrangeHurst97 (2024-11-21 16:02:51+00:00): Hi Tom,
I have just surveyed a post box in East Grinstead that you tagged as removed.
It IS still present, so I have reverted that part of your edit. The mapillary image that you tagged was on the incorrect road, so I have removed that tag as well.
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-28 08:08:19+00:00): Great work on your mapping. Keep contributing, Cheers! You can press Q when you finished building mapping for building orthogonalize shape or you can use building tool which does not need to reshape square.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151930380
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-28 08:04:15+00:00): "Great work on your mapping. I found an unintentional error which is overlapped segments from two streams. Otherwise, it looks good.
Keep contributing, Cheers! "
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151930398
JeroenHoek (2024-05-31 08:56:25+00:00): Dit klopt denk ik niet. Die afkorting tussen haakjes hoort niet achter de naam van het kerkje te staan. 

Als ik de link volg zie ik dat dit refo's zijn. Waarom dan denomination=protestant als denomination=reformed specifieker is? Zitten hier dan ook andere protestantse gemeentes in?

Zie:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:denomination
mgpx (2024-08-01 16:14:29+00:00): A módosításcsomagban a tettél egy megjegyzést, hogy a Róka út nem látogatható, viszont a belépési tilalmat egy foot=yes címkével mégis felülírtad. Miért ?

Az OSM oldaláról annyi az elvárás, hogy a az access és foot címkék a valós jogi állapotot tükrözzék arról, hogy az útszakasz látogatható vagy sem. Az útvonaltervezők saját döntése, hogy ezt figyelembe veszik-e.  Számos útvonaltervező valóban figyelembe veszi ezen címkéket, és elkerüli a tilalom alá eső utakat, de jópár tervezőben beállítható, hogy hagyja figyelmen kívül a tilalmat jelző címkéket. 

Ha szeretnél tilalom alá eső utakra tervezni, akkor erre alkalmas útvonaltervezőt kell választanod, az OSM adatok manipulálása ellentétes az OSM közösség szabályaival
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-28 08:00:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/573548813

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Jordi MF (2024-05-28 08:14:21+00:00): ¿Por qué modificas el nombre del museo? La infografía y cartelería externa no indica "Museo/Museu".
aTarom (2024-05-28 15:50:29+00:00): Bienvenido, por poner un ejemplo de no concordancia del texto del changeset con lo editado:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/947108836/history
modificas el valor de la wikipedia de ca:... a es:... en la comunidad se ha comentado no tener el campo wikipedia si ya existe el wikidata, así evitamos guerra de ediciones, al menos por este tag... puedes ponerte en contacto por el foro, telegram o contestando este mismo changeset?
silversurfer83 (2024-05-28 12:43:56+00:00): Hi Michael :)

kleiner Tipp: Wenn du ein Objekt eingezeichnet hast, das in der Realität ziemlich rechtwinklig ist, kannst du das auch bei OSM sauber rechtwinklig machen in dem du nach der Vergabe der Eigenschaften die Taste "Q" drückst.

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151931096
Michael Heinisch (2024-05-29 11:07:08+00:00): Danke für Deinen Tipp, @silversurfer83, das probiere ich direkt mal aus. Interessante Funktion der Diskussion/Kommentare...
VG Michael
Jakka (2024-05-28 09:49:47+00:00): je toevoeging gebruikt dit gans het gebouw ? nu overlapt je deze https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4814029200 ?
mogelijk dat deze niet meer actief is ????
Best activiteiten op punt node te zetten, het gebouw op zich heeft meestal niets te maken met wat erin gebeurt. Graag een antwoordje
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-28 08:33:45+00:00): "Great work on your mapping. I found an unintentional error which is to adjust the building or landuse polygon, they should not be overlapped or across each other. Otherwise, it looks good.
Keep contributing, Cheers! "
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151931535
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-28 08:29:46+00:00): Great work on your mapping. Keep contributing, Cheers! You can press Q when you finished building mapping for building orthogonalize shape or you can use building tool which does not need to reshape square.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151931550
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-28 08:23:34+00:00): """Great work on your mapping. I found an unintentional error which is to adjust the building size based on the using satellite imagery. Otherwise, it looks good.
Keep contributing, Cheers! """
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151931578
akimapbuilder (2024-05-28 09:19:24+00:00): When adding building, try to follow building footprints and match the geometry. Cheers!
bkil (2024-05-28 09:42:02+00:00): Köszönjük a közreműködést! Minden apró segítség számít. Ha mindenki csak a saját utcáját rendbe tenné, már rég kész lennének a térképpel. Csak így tovább!
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 12:10:51+00:00): Just a test?

Thanks for your answer.
translink-david (2024-05-31 12:15:22+00:00): Yes, we are exploring the new tracks being plotted in OSM

Thanks

David
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 12:25:27+00:00): Thanks for your answer.

You should not do your testing @ the main OSM database. Please have a look: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_the_dev_server

Hope that it helps you. Thanks!
Lezurex (2024-05-28 11:17:34+00:00): Hallo Thomaso58 und willkommen auf OpenStreetMap!

Bitte beachte, dass route=mtb nur auf Relationen verwendet werden sollte. Für den Key "route" gibt es nur wenig Ausnahmen, wo er auf Ways verwendet werden kann (bspw. Schiffsrouten oder Skipisten). Bitte also route=mtb von den Wegen entfernen.

Eine Route existiert dann, wenn sie irgendwo definiert und auch mehr oder weniger ausgeschildert ist. Meist sind sie nummeriert (Linien des ÖVs, Autobahnen, Nationalstrassen, Velorouten etc.). Daher die Frage: Ist diese MTB-Route, die du hier eintragen möchtest, tatsächlich auch als solche ausgeschildert? Nur, weil man eine gewisse Strecke mit dem Velo befahren kann und dann eine schöne Tour gemacht hat, ist das noch keine Route, die als solche eingetragen werden sollte, das ist ja sehr subjektiv dann.

Sieh dir dazu mal die Wiki-Seite zu mtb-Routen an: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aroute%3Dmtb

Auch noch wichtig: decline gibt es nicht, es gibt nur incline. Wenn du ein Gefälle eintragen möchtest, machst du das mit incline mit einem negativen Wert.

Du hast auch noch auf einer Gemeindegrenze route=mtb hinzugefügt. Auf einer Gemeindegrenze kann man aber gar nicht fahren ;D, bitte entfernen.

Bei Fragen und Unklarheiten einfach fragen.

LG Lezurex
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-03 20:47:09+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11939102624/history has shop = sweets_shop that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=sweets_shop? Is it shop=confectionery ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dconfectionery ) ? If not, how it differs from shop=confectionery ? Maybe it is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dpastry or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dchocolate ?
TomatoCat (2024-05-28 08:54:08+00:00): Why did it post my old description. This adds major detail to a national guard armory and a few neighboring buildings
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-28 09:11:56+00:00): """Great work on your mapping. I found some unintentional errors which are duplicated ways with residential (highway) and overlapping highways. Otherwise, it looks good.
Keep contributing, Cheers! """
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151933321
BR_pebble (2024-07-02 14:27:12+00:00): Hello aartipawar
Thank you for mapping!
I have added missing buildings -37.8462983, 145.0009717;
-37.8462857, 145.0008286;
-37.846321, 145.0008815;
-37.8463364, 145.0009757;
-37.8464148, 145.0008477;
-37.8462441, 145.0014337;
-37.8461303, 145.0013075;
-37.8463884, 145.0013794;
-37.8464522, 145.0013669;
-37.8463545, 145.0019735;
-37.8463582, 145.0020191;
-37.8463841, 145.0022578;
-37.8463811, 145.0022686;
-37.8463905, 145.0023329;
-37.8464296, 145.0023195;
-37.8462714, 145.0020655;
-37.8452827, 145.0019307;
-37.8451762, 145.0020102;
-37.8455096, 145.0010709;
-37.8454726, 145.0009795;
-37.8454177, 145.0011051;
-37.8451942, 145.0006295;
-37.8463485, 145.0024098;
-37.8462371, 145.0020764;
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
bike'n'hike (2024-05-28 15:52:15+00:00): Hi Thobrist,
thank you for your contributions.
Please bear in mind that there's no "Marienberger Str." in Bruckmühl.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4268895
eggie (2024-05-28 09:30:16+00:00): Dag K Hamstra Door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus  is er schade ontstaan aan de kaart.
Adresnodes verplaatst in Houtigehage en Buitenpost.
Het punt dat je hebt gebplaatst met name=Paal werkt niet in OSM.
Kijk eens in de wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard

Wanneer de brandweer er niet doorkan is de tag barrier=bollard met bollard=fixed genoeg. (vast paaltje) Geen naamtags gebruiken. De router kan er helemaal niet mee. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-28 09:42:51+00:00): reverted by changeset #151935295

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151934002
eggie (2024-05-28 09:52:12+00:00): barrier=bollard
bollard=foldable
emergency=no
heb ik toegevoegd name=Paal verwijderd.
De paal kan wel naar beneden mbv een sleutel?
Is het hier wellicht te smal voor een wagen?  Dan de breedte opgeven.
MVG
eggie
KHamstraVRFR (2024-05-28 11:14:00+00:00): Ongeveer 2 meter, maar voor hulpdiensten is het niet wenselijk om een paal te verwijderen. Alvast bedankt voor de medewerking.
eggie (2024-05-28 11:33:44+00:00): Oke.. het zal hier niet routeren in livenav
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-28 10:02:27+00:00): Great work on your mapping. You can press Q when you finished building mapping for building orthogonalize shape or you can use building tool which does not need to reshape square. Keep contributing, Cheers!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151934063
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-28 09:49:52+00:00): Great work on your mapping. You can press Q when you finished building mapping for building orthogonalize shape or you can use building tool which does not need to reshape square, and adjacent building node you can unglue by pressing G. Keep contributing, Cheers!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151934090
eggie (2024-05-28 09:35:32+00:00): Een punt met name=Blok doet helemaal niets in OSM en zeker niet in de routering.
Probeer je te verdiepen hoe te mappen.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151934152


Hoe lang ligt hier een afsluiting?

Ik zal het aanpassen naar barrier=block

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-28 09:59:49+00:00): Op het Pleinpaed ook een block ingetekend.
KHamstraVRFR (2024-05-28 11:13:02+00:00): Deze afsluiting ligt er al een paar jaren. Alvast bedankt voor de medewerking.
HirschKauz (2024-05-29 15:20:13+00:00): Hi 
I found this for chimney: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dchimney 
And I think height=* should be numeric value in meters ;-) 
Greets
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 09:00:46+00:00): Thank you for your contribution in mapping. This aquaculture ponds mapping look great and also the clear changeset comment. Keep Contributing, Cheers!!!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151934339
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 09:06:24+00:00): Thank you for your contribution in mapping. This aquaculture ponds mapping look great and also the clear changeset comment. Keep Contributing, Cheers!!!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151934339
Mahdi Nameghi (2024-05-28 11:38:07+00:00): سلام
احیانا نام اینجا آزادگان نبوده؟ چون با ر نوشتید
Nastaran_Sabouri (2024-08-10 12:18:53+00:00): It was wrong
Thank you for correcting
Erelen (2024-05-28 22:57:05+00:00): There is no continuous cycleway there. Road signs (as ground truth) break it several times, as I mapped earlier.
Jordi MF (2024-05-28 17:34:42+00:00): Hola Hadarelo,

Has pedido que revisemos esta edición. Hay varias ediciones. ¿Quieres que revisemos algo en concreto?

Saludos y gracias por mejorar OSM.
eggie (2024-05-28 10:03:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-28 10:31:48+00:00): Great work on your mapping. I found some unintentional errors like node connects highway and building, unnecessary tag - area=yes for building.
Keep contributing, Cheers!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151935978
user_13006008 (2024-06-16 14:36:16+00:00): Tuh, ditegur panitia.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/cleanup-of-name-fields-describing-buildings/99591/33
nevw (2024-05-28 11:09:32+00:00): Hi, I would like to know how you were able to extend Back Creek as a culvert from Waringal Road to near the junction of Canterbury Road and Elgar Road
Dominic_Burns (2024-05-29 03:58:46+00:00): http://www.friendsofbackcreek.org/

"Back Creek rises as a spring on the slopes of the hill at the corner of Canterbury Rd and Elgar Rd in Box Hill"
nevw (2024-05-29 04:17:29+00:00): Thanks for the info and your efforts to maintain the creek environs are admirable.
eggie (2024-05-28 10:30:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Op welk adres zit dit bedrijf? 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
rui228 (2024-06-05 20:40:31+00:00): Olá. A rua Rua Doutor Serafim Correia Pinto Guimarães não é uma estrada terciária. A que se deveu a alteração?
Cumprimentos.
user_11609320 (2024-05-28 10:12:01+00:00): i understand based on the comment node that it looks weird, but the design of the parking is weird, so I consolidated some of the parking where possible
yzal (2024-05-28 13:11:52+00:00): Dobrý deň, boli ste to prosím skontrolovať aj na mieste? Ja som tade išiel 2-3 dni dozadu a jednosmerka na Jašíka nebola.
yzal (2024-06-01 13:37:07+00:00): Bez odpovede a žiadna jednosmerka tam nie je. Vrátil som všetky zmeny.
ToniE (2024-05-28 13:46:29+00:00): Hmm,

mit access=no darf dann auch kein zu Fuß gehender Mensch = Fan dort hin.

wäre 

motor_vehicle:conditional = no @ (2024 May 28-2024 Jul 28)

nicht korrekter?
Evtl. 'vehicle' statt 'motor_vehicle'?

Gruß
Toni
Qwajo OSM (2024-05-30 15:57:36+00:00): These are multiple buildings mapped as one. It doesn't give the right map of the area. Please verify that
Hungerburg (2024-06-03 16:40:15+00:00): Hallo RR, was ist am neuen Wikidata besser https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1177311684/history - nicht dasselbe?
Road–Runner (2024-06-04 21:30:41+00:00): Das waren anscheinend zwei Duplikate. Ich habe nun den alten Eintrag auf Wikidata mit dem neuen zusammengeführt.
JassKurn (2024-05-28 15:06:32+00:00): Hi Tom.

You've removed a post box, north of Exeter that I am confident is still in use. It appears you've used Mapillary images available via pic4review. It can be seen on Mapillary images dates 11 may 2024. 

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=17&lat=50.7547185&lng=-3.5541450999972&dateFrom=2023-01-01&focus=photo&pKey=1857562381379818&x=0.4863778702581276&y=0.6190027201371464&zoom=0
Road imagery can miss post boxes that are behind parked cars, set back into a hedge.

Thanks,

Jass
Jakka (2024-05-29 07:33:33+00:00): Nooit toegangkelijk voor alle motorvoertuigen ? Welk verkeersborden staan er ?
literan (2024-05-28 20:54:48+00:00): не надо приклеивать здания к иным, линейным объектам
mikimapbuilder (2024-05-28 11:08:55+00:00): Removed descriptive address name.
gurglypipe (2024-05-30 13:42:50+00:00): I’m confused. In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150711518 you said it was private parking for residents. Thus the amenity=parking (with access=private) was correct.

Was that incorrect?
gp10101 (2024-05-30 14:10:11+00:00): Yes as per my edits the map is correct 2 small areas of private parking to the east and west and in the middle there is a large hardstanding / road whatever you want to call it that is no parking and marked out as do with signage.  Hence why I removed the parking designation which had been added.  I have visited the location to confirm this again now.
gurglypipe (2024-05-31 14:51:12+00:00): OK, ta.
BR_pebble (2024-07-02 14:28:03+00:00): Hello aartipawar
Thank you for mapping!
I have added missing buildinsg -37.860162, 145.0002216;
-37.8597425, 145.0000582;
-37.8606075, 144.9983579;
-37.8593549, 144.9984039;
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-28 16:54:35+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151938814
AgusQui (2024-05-30 03:09:17+00:00): los highway=tertiary se deben poner a discresión resaltando calles que funcionen como avenidas troncales, en zonas muy urbanizadas y con muchas avenidas no es necesario "pintar" todo de amarillo. Por favor leer las reglas de la comunidad en la wiki de Argentina o contactarse por Telegram o el foro.
Bobropiton (2024-07-10 22:32:38+00:00): Чушь натворили. Стоп-это одна точка, а халт-другая.
ov_079 (2024-06-01 07:30:04+00:00): This is just wrong. What is your source? Line 4 does NOT go via the dead end street of Reddingsweg.

Like it was before, line 4 stops at the stop that is called Knuppeldam for line 5. It's the same stop with different names for different lines, which makes it confusing. 

What you've now mapped as Knuppeldam is both the stop Knuppeldam as well as the stop Reddingsweg/Aisterbun for both lines 4 and 5.

Source: just walked by there + did a 1yr research paper on public transport on the Dutch Wadden Islands.
Gertjan Idema (2024-06-01 08:28:07+00:00): Hi ov_079,
Thanks for this update. I must say, this situation confused me as well. My sources are the Arriva NeTex data (from ndovloket.nl), ovinnederland.nl and the CHB (Centraal haltebestand) data (from ndovloket.nl).
The CHB data gives the locations of the bus stops and is the least reliable. I only use this location is I have no other information about the location of a bus stop, which was the case for Reddingsweg/Aisterburn.
Based on your information, I propose to move these bus stops next to the Knuppeldam bus stops. Because they have different names and bus_stop codes (ref:IFOPT), I'd rather not merge them.
Gertjan
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 12:12:07+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151940854
BCNorwich (2024-05-29 06:39:07+00:00): Hi, Sorry to say you've made some mistakes here with the Southern Upland Way, one section now goes through a building. There is duplication of highways at another section and strange track alignments.

Has the SUW been diverted at the farm buildings? I can find no verification of this, the SUW online maps show the way as on the tracks SW of the buildings.

The original route of the SUW does not pass through the curtilage of the farm buildings so I can see no reason for a detour. 

Could you please explain the reason for the your changes to the SUW?

Regards Bernard.
GeorgeSmith11 (2024-05-29 08:14:17+00:00): ﻿Hi I am a big walker and record routes I walk, and the bit that I clumsily attempted to change I have recorded, and will happily send to you so that you can teach me how to make corrections. The signposts clearly divert around the buildings and have done for a considerable time judging by the age of the posts. Can you tell me is anyone assigned to look after the routing our long distance paths on open street map ?

https://explore.osmaps.com/route/21758749/suw-lauder-to-melrose-25524?lat=55.640527&lon=-2.733981&zoom=14.9411&style=Leisure&type=2d

Regards George
BCNorwich (2024-05-29 15:06:47+00:00): Hi, I'll be glad to help. 

There is a proposed route relation for a Mountain Bike trail that shares this section of tracks with the SUW. So I think it would be best to revert your changes and start again. Reverting changes and amending route relations is very tricky with the iD editor. This work is best done with the JOSM editor. I use JOSM so can do this editing easily. Is this OK?

Could you send your recording of the trip please. You can do this by clicking on my user name, then click send message.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2024-05-31 07:24:36+00:00): Hi, I've reverted 3 changesets to correct the tracks and both relations to their former state. 

Your link above doesn't work for me. If you can give info on the SUW diversion and any links, I'll amend the SUW route relation.

Regards Bernard.
f_husni (2024-08-07 09:57:08+00:00): Halo mas. saya ingin bertanya terkait road change yang mana banyak kelas jalan rendah dirubah ke klasifikasi jalan nasional atau trunk. pada way id way/1287364491 ini adalah buntu dan way/628724543 ini pun jalan sebelumnya adalah track. dan setelah saya cek di satelit imagery pun jalan nya masih sangat rapat vegetasi.  apa dasar mas merubah jalan2 tersebut menjadi jalan trunk? apakah melalui survei? atau permen 1688? jika iya berdasarkan permen, saran saya rubah jika jalan tersebut memang sudah siap digunakan? atau jika jalan tersebut sedang pembangunan, mas bisa tambahkan tag construction atau dengan merubah nya ke kelas jalan sebelumnya dan menambahkan tag plannedhighway=trunk 

saya sangat terbuka dengan diskusi, sangat senang jika kita bisa berdiskusi lebih lanjut.
amtplskaart (2024-08-08 01:57:58+00:00): Sementara ini klasifikasi "trunk" di ruas jalan ini tampaknya tidak memenuhi kriteria keterhubungan dengan jaringan "trunk" yang lain dan juga tidak termasuk dalam KepMen 1688/kpts/m/2022, sehingga sebaiknya dikembalikan pada klasifikasi yang lebih sesuai.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 12:11:55+00:00): Revert of https://osm.org/changeset/151939908