piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kadiwa (2025-12-07 19:12:07+00:00): Sehr schön gemappt! :) Aber nicht vergessen, den vorher an der Straße eingetragenen Gehweg und Radweg wieder auszutragen (Hab ich jetzt gemacht). Und ich habe die vorher eingetragene Gehwegoberfläche auf den neuen Gehweg übertragen, damit das nicht verloren geht.
HurricaneGator (2025-12-11 22:48:10+00:00): Hello, LovenOutdoors! I noticed you changed and added some ref tags in northern Cyprus. Some examples include ref=İK.05 to ref=D925 around (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/309612555), ref=D.55 to D 950 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1005400399 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965339335), ref=D.10 to D100 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/806363590 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1244083914). I was wondering if you could provide some street level imagery or official documentation that reflect these changes. Thank you and happy mapping!
LovenOutdoors (2025-12-12 17:21:35+00:00): Hello

I have some screenshots from Google Maps and Streetview which show the D100 number on road signs. Please see the screenshots in this folder https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Gh3Fzqec1bO3yzkEh2njRGQ1i8ZWwgo6?usp=sharing
HurricaneGator (2025-12-15 21:57:34+00:00): Hello LovenOutdoors, thanks for the reply! Unfortunately, Google Maps is not licensable for use in OpenStreetMap, and data from proprietary sources/maps should not be used to support edits (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Don%27t_copy_from_other_maps). Do you have any official government documentation or ground-level imagery from publicly citable OSM-compatible sources (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street-level_imagery_services) that could confirm these ref updates? Thank you and happy mapping!
LovenOutdoors (2025-12-16 21:16:49+00:00): Hello

Sorry I didn't realise that OSM cannot accept Google Streetview as a source. Is there a quick way to undo the changes? Thanks
HurricaneGator (2025-12-17 22:41:05+00:00): Hello LovenOutdoors. There is a revert tool in JOSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Change_rollback) but you can also manually change the data back to its previous state. If you don’t feel comfortable doing so, I’m more than happy to do it for you. Happy mapping!
LovenOutdoors (2025-12-18 18:39:46+00:00): I have requested all these changes be reverted

https://revert.osmz.ru/11918

Reverting changesets: 175634985 175634789 175634733 175634384 175634085 175633919 175579147
Comment: I used Google Maps which isn't acceptable source
User: LovenOutdoors
Added: 18.12.2025

Status: queued
HurricaneGator (2025-12-18 21:00:43+00:00): Thank you!
SomeoneElse (2026-01-11 14:59:40+00:00): I'm confused by "crossing=traffic_signals;uncontrolled" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/91037215/history ?  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing?uselang=en-GB suggests that one tag means "traffic lights" and the other says "no traffic lights"?
Cheers,
Andy
ramthelinefeed (2026-01-11 20:37:12+00:00): I suspect this was just a case of selecting the wrong proferred option in the ID editor!
eggie (2025-12-07 20:08:06+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.
Bedankt voor uw bijdrage, 
Ik heb wat aangepast zodat het straks te zien zal zijn op de kaart. Format postcode en phone aangepast.

MVG
eggie
Valerio_Bozzolan (2025-12-15 14:04:04+00:00): (Relevant discussion https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:subject:wikidata )

Thanks for this change, but I'm inclined to remove the space. Since if you want to endorse the separator ";", then we should adopt that, and not "; " with the space. What do you think about? Thank you so much
mueschel (2025-12-15 14:26:28+00:00): You can remove the space, but it is not required. I'm sure that every tool that handles the ';' properly also can work with white space before and after.
E.g. osm.org properly adds links no matter if there is a space or not.
Valerio_Bozzolan (2025-12-15 15:59:06+00:00): Yep! I hope it would be supported too! but the space does not seem a best practice. I'm dropping it, unless the policy will change.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator#Space_character_padding
user_5359 (2025-12-08 07:07:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/3621209058 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
PizzaTreeIsland (2025-12-07 19:16:40+00:00): 

Hello,
thank you for your edit! Please take your time to write proper changeset comments in the future to make it easier for others to see what you did.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks and happy mapping!
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2025-12-15 15:25:40+00:00): Hola,

Esos "límites completamente inventados" son creados como una figura de protección ambiental el 12 de octubre de 1930 por la Real Orden 213/1930 bajo la clasificación, hoy vigente de "Sitio Natural de Interés Nacional", así que igual tan inventados no estaban y quizá sea interesante revertir esta edición...

-Arturo
Hugoren Martinako (2025-12-15 15:47:52+00:00): Vamos a ver, haces un polígono sacado de la manga aportando documentación de hace casi 100 años:

- Un mapa del pinar de Acebeda, que es otra cosa: https://www.acueducto2.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/01-mapa-PINAR-ACEBEDA-1931.jpg
- Un recorte de periódico de la Gaceta de Madrid: https://www.boe.es/datos/pdfs/BOE//1930/285/A00283-00285.pdf

No aparecen límites en ninguna parte, y los haces a ojo.  Y luego creas una figura protegida cuando el ministerio de medio ambiente no le otorga ninguna clasificación especial, ya que pertenece al PN Sierra de Guadarrama.

Esto no funciona así, no es necesario  delimitar todo (ahora está como nodo), y menos elementos cuyos límites no son verificables, como espacios abiertos. Un Parque Natural es una figura legal protegida y por eso tiene sus límites bien definidos (es información descargable, y actualizable si fuese el caso).

Lo que no es de recibo es leer por internet algo, y decidir que la extensión de algo es tal que así. No tenemos ningún tipo de autoridad para establecer delimitaciones oficiales de ese modo.

Un saludo
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2025-12-15 16:33:40+00:00): El mapa es este:
https://www.acueducto2.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/01-Pedriza-Manzanares_mapa.jpg

Unos límites fácilmente trasladables a la actualidad porque las elevaciones y ríos no han cambiado.

Y la figura legalmente reconocida sigue existiendo.
Hugoren Martinako (2025-12-15 18:37:18+00:00): Los espacios naturales de la comunidad de madrid están aquí listados: https://www.comunidad.madrid/servicios/urbanismo-medio-ambiente/espacios-naturales-protegidos, la pedriza está incluida en el parque natural de la Sierra de Guadarrama. Esa es la figura legal.

El límite lo aportas de una página que tiene un mapa con un dibujo (lo mismo que el pinar de Acebeda), ni siquiera está recogido por el IGN en sus minutas históricas. Misma validez que hacerlo tú mismo.

Es evidente que tienes una inclinación por los límites, pero el mapa no va a ser mejor solo porque tengamos esa información en forma de área/relación. Es más, áreas vagamente definidas, o mal definidas, dan mala calidad al mapa.
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2025-12-15 19:45:00+00:00): Parque Nacional, no natural y tampoco íntegramente. Y como otras tantas figuras de protección ya existentes en 2013 que fueron reforzadas con esta última, por ejemplo el Parque natural de la Cumbre, el Circo y las Lagunas de Peñalara, que aunque, ahora esté dentro del nacional, no ha desaparecido porque su ordenamiento legal sigue vigente

Por mucho que la web autonómica no se acuerde de sus figuras de protección, existe una Real Orden vigente que la reconoce y hay multitud de cartelería informativa por la sierra que habla de los lugares declarados "sitio natural de interés nacional", ya les mandaré un correo recordándoselo.

Y la relación es perfectamente exacta ya que el mapa del momento de la declaración se superpone a accidentes geográficas perfectamente reconocibles y replicables.
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2025-12-15 19:47:23+00:00): Otra cosa discutible es como etiquetar la relación, si dada su integración en otras figuras y su antigüedad debe etiquetarse como estaba, pero si está vigente que menos que poderla identificar para enlazarla con bases de datos como Wikidata o relativos a puntos naturales protegidos que tienen presente su delimitación
Hugoren Martinako (2025-12-15 19:55:14+00:00): Just for the record, la Pedriza sigue existiendo como nodo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13360114505, así como https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456898564 y https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456898563
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2025-12-15 20:55:48+00:00): Pero es un área de varios km² delimitados
msevilla00 (2025-12-17 22:44:35+00:00): Hola Arturo,
Creo que deberíamos debatir más en detalle este tipo de ediciones puesto que son un tanto extrañas. Yo no veo mal que estén en la base de datos pero no puedo ver que sean áreas protegidas vigentes.
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2025-12-18 23:42:10+00:00): Hola,
Mañana miro a ver si me reinstalo Telegram y lo comentamos, que desde que cambié de teléfono estoy muy desconectado de los debates de la comunidad.
eggie (2025-12-07 20:26:28+00:00): Dag xBitsNL,

Lijkt me helemaal oke zo.

MVG
eggie
b-jazz (2025-12-09 18:57:06+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456745514

When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. If you could go back and clean up where you've made this mistake, that would be helpful. But more importantly, if you could stop from doing this in the future, it would be greatly appreciated. Please read the wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out.
b-jazz (2025-12-09 18:58:14+00:00): Also, you are deleting a bunch of historical data in this change in order to recreate features from scratch. It's bad to lose all of that history and context when you do this, so please stop deleting and do your best to modify instead.
Thanks.
benguuuuu (2025-12-09 19:06:31+00:00): Good to know.  This course was pretty rough so deleting and redoing was faster.  I will keep that in mind going forward.  I'll make sure I work with multipolygons going forward.  Many of the courses I have seen were done with overlapping so I just followed suit.
b-jazz (2025-12-09 19:15:57+00:00): Thanks. Yeah, I've been cleaning up golf courses over the last 3 years in hopes that people won't see these bad habits and spread them around farther.
Dimitar155 (2025-12-07 20:09:38+00:00): Здравей,

Това не са самостоятелни университети, поради което им бях сложил amenity=faculty. И аз бих искал да се показват на картата, но не е окей да тагваме за картата (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer).
b-jazz (2025-12-09 23:31:59+00:00): Hey Pizza,

How did you come across this tee box to make this change? 

I have a biased opinion about adding both golf=tee nodes at the same time as golf=tee areas. First off, the concept of a tee node is really kind of arbitrary and nearly impossible to tell from imagery, whereas a tee box is far more likely to be visible and easily mapped. So claiming that one knows exactly at which point in the box to tee off from is specious at best. So with that, I've been deleting the tags off of the start of the golf hole when they are inside a tee area. The wiki says put the tag on the node OR the way, so that's a little justification for what I'm doing, though I agree that point could be argued.

(I kind of feel the same way about golf=pin since that is clearly wrong 99.9% of the time as the hole is moved across the green on a regular basis. But I haven't made any edits to reflect that, and don't really plan to at this time.

What are your thoughts?
PizzaTreeIsland (2025-12-10 02:54:44+00:00): Hello, 
I found this place as part of my cleanup of wrong or weird tags, in this case related to golf. The node that was supposed to be the pin was tagged golf=pin;tee, which obviously doesn't make sense, so I moved over the tee part to the correct node, honestly not thinking about the issue about the tee node being inside the tee box area, or looking at its history. 
I don't think it matters too much, I think the node being tagged as well as the area doesn't hurt, although I can see your argument and it makes sense to have it consistent at last within one golf course, if not world wide. So feel free to remove the tag again. Sorry for the inconvenience. 
I get your point about the pin being placed randomly aswell, but everyone who cares about golf and looks at this map will know that it is not a correct placement, almomst by definition. But maybe it is more of a fool proof and machine readable way to say "this is the play direction of this hole". Same with how shop or restaurant nodes within buildings are placed randomly somewhere inside the store/restaurant area.
fghj753 (2025-12-09 07:08:06+00:00): Found reference source: https://www.tallinn.ee/et/lahepea
Sander Sõnaj (2025-12-09 23:31:33+00:00): Thank you! Sorry again for the confusion.
Halfix (2025-12-12 18:05:12+00:00): Hallo Frank (leite ich aus dem Frankst ab), gegen den Anschluss der neuen FAU-Zone auf dem ehemaligen Siemens-Areal an die Gesamtrelation der FAU spricht natürlich nichts, aber irgendetwas stimmt da technisch nicht. Uniflächen sollten eigentlich in 'educational'-Gelb gerendert werden - wird in deinem verlinkten Wiki-Beitrag so beschrieben und ist z.B. bei der referenzierten Beispiel-Uni RWTH auch so zu sehen, bei der FAU ist es aber nicht so. Die Flächen der Unikliniken in Erlangen sind 'educational'-Gelb gerendert, die anderen der FAU zugeordneten Flächen aber nicht. Ich bin zwar FAU-Alumnus und könnte das recherchieren und sicherlich klären, würde mich aber aus dem FAU-Mapping eigentlich lieber heraushalten – ich habe andere Mappingschwerpunkte. Die neue Zone habe ich eher aus der Warte des ehemaligen Siemens-Mitarbeiters, der stauend die Metamorphose des Forschungszentrumgelände zum Siemens-Campus beobachtet, anglegt. Wie ich die neue FAU-Zone angelegt hatte, war sie farblich korrekt in 'educational'-Gelb gerendert, nach deiner Änderung ist sie jetzt aber, wie die anderen FAU-Flächen, wieder ohne Hintergrundfarbe (also Default-Grau).
Gruß Gerhard (Halfix)
Frankst (2025-12-14 16:40:28+00:00): Hallo Gerhard, ich schau mal ob ich dazu was rausfinden kann. Da muss ich mal etwas tiefer in die Details des Renderings mich reinarbeiten (und/oder wen fragen :).
Frankst (2025-12-14 17:36:15+00:00): Jetzt sollte es passen, die FAU-Relation hat wahrs. einen anderen type benötigt.
Halfix (2025-12-14 20:26:10+00:00): Die Änderung von 'type=multipolygon' auf 'type=site' wurde mit v20 der Relation vom User WoSoe durchgeführt. Der fällt mir öfter auf, der hat eigentlich kein spezifisches Interesse an Unis, sondern ist ein generischer Bug-Buster mit Spezialgebiet Relationen/Multipolygone. Ich vermute mal, dass ihm die FAU-Relation jetzt wieder auffallen wird, weil sie geschachtelte Multipolygone enthält (Institut für Geographie und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät) was, soweit ich weiß, nicht regelkonform ist.
eggie (2025-12-07 20:10:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Alle adressen zijn directe import vanuit de BAG  Beter niets aan het format veranderen. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-07 21:00:29+00:00): Positie veranderen is geen probleem.
user_5359 (2025-12-09 10:43:01+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/351136480. What is the mean of the tag rkd:eid?
JanezPavelZebovec (2025-12-09 11:14:50+00:00): Hello! It should ve 'ref:eid' (as I use elsewhere) and is ID of cultural heritage places of Slovenia government as indicated on https://geohub.gov.si/ghapp/giskd/.
Thank you for warning. I will fix that. Do you have better suggestion on tagging those IDs?
silversurfer83 (2025-12-08 18:58:53+00:00): welcome back :)

this looks like a good addition to the database. Thank you.

One thing I'd like you to consider going forward:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175638863
bartgron (2025-12-07 21:06:32+00:00): Jaki jest cel dodawania i od razu usuwania tych punktów?
SpinOff (2025-12-12 20:14:23+00:00): Poprawiłem tak jak w sąsiednich budynkach: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/906193471
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-13 19:17:52+00:00): К сожалению 2Гис использовать для правок нельзя
user_18023081 (2025-12-07 20:58:44+00:00): Accidentally uploaded without specifying "import", I only noticed it after clicking Upload and the Cancel button did nothing


thanks JOSM
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-12-08 12:22:34+00:00): Merhaba. Bazı yolların etiketini highway=service'ten highway=busway'e çevirmişsiniz. Bu değişikliğinizin doğru olmadığını düşünüyorum. highway=busway etiketinin Viki sayfasında, hangi yolların busway olmadığını anlatıldığı kısımda verilen ilk örneğe bkz:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=busway#What_is_not_a_busway

Otobüs güzergahlarını veri tüketicilerinin doğru yorumlayabilmesi için durakların sırayla eklenmesi gerekiyor. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses#Adding_bus_stops_to_the_relation

Düzenlediğiniz otobüs rotası ilişkilerinde kopuk olanlar var. Örnek: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/544983 (Bağlantıya tıklayıp güzergah boyu incelediğinde turuncu çizginin koptuğu yolları görebilirsiniz.)

İyi günler.
zuicz (2025-12-08 10:08:55+00:00): proszę przestać zmieniać nazwę na nieprawdziwą
aharvey (2025-12-07 23:33:22+00:00): hi you have dragged the tree into the ocean https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13332744765/history
Tjuro (2025-12-08 05:36:25+00:00): Beste @win88,

Ik zie dat je hier wat hebt veranderd, op dit vlak heb je landuse=education verwijderd:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455812939

Was dit de bedoeling?

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
@win88 (2025-12-08 13:40:23+00:00): Hallo @Tjuro,

OSM kwam zelf met het voorstel van missende tag:
education=school dus dat heb ik aangehouden.

Zie nu op de wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Education_features 
dat amenity=school goed is en     landuse=education als optie. Dus beide zijn goed? 

Als het anders moet hoor ik het graag (en waarom? dan leer ik daar weer van), en pas ik het aan.
Tjuro (2025-12-14 21:01:42+00:00): Hoi @win88,

Voor meer info over education=school zie:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/why-is-it-ok-that-id-performs-undiscussed-semiautomatic-distributed-mass-edits/139011

Maar het is belangrijk om niet zomaar op ja te klikken, vaak zijn suggesties niet van toepassing of in dit geval totaal niet gediscussieerd. Als het een aanpassing is die een mapper zelf ook zou maken dan is het ok.

Bij landuse=education en amenity=school zijn beiden goed, maar deze zijn niet vervangbaar te gebruiken.

landuse=education gaat over de functie van een stuk grond, zie het als de bestemming van de grond.

amenity=school is een poi een punt van intresse van waar een school zich bevind.

Deze twee tags komen beiden met eigen gebruiken, zo is het bijvoorbeeld de bedoeling dat er voor één school één amenity=school gebruikt word, beter bekend onder one feature one element

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
Tjuro (2025-12-15 06:37:02+00:00): Hoi @win88,

Ik was nog vergeten te zeggen dat alle editors, kaartlagen etc niet van OSM zijn. Op een paar dingen na wordt alles gedraaid door individuen, sommigen doen dingen met de community en andere doen gewoon wat ze zelf willen. Realiseer je dat een suggestie of iets wat wel/niet op de kaart toont vaak de keuze is van één persoon.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
rskedgell (2025-12-09 23:32:02+00:00): Please don't tag for the renderer. It's a bus rapid transit scheme, not a guided busway.
mcliquid (2025-12-08 10:17:53+00:00): Hello 5R-MFT, thank you for your contributions with MapComplete and for adding etymology data!

A small note: this changeset includes edits ranging from Stuttgart all the way to Spain. Such a wide geographic span makes it harder for other mappers to review or understand the grouped changes.

Since MapComplete automatically merges edits into the currently open changeset, this usually happens when continuing to map in a new area before the previous changeset has closed. To keep changes geographically focused, it helps to wait until the active changeset has been closed before starting to edit in a distant region.

More details can be found here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for keeping this in mind, and happy mapping!
5R-MFT (2025-12-09 17:12:36+00:00): Oh sorry, I didn't now this.  Next time I work my list place by place only, without changing the location.
rskedgell (2025-12-09 23:34:35+00:00): It isn't a bus guideway. Even on real ones, the guided section doesn't extend into bus stattions.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-11 01:01:29+00:00): DWG revert - remove incorrect guideway tagging

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175781607
bartgron (2025-12-07 22:27:56+00:00): Obydwa zestawy zmian wycofane:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175642327
Pozdrawiam
aTarom (2025-12-08 09:58:04+00:00): Hola, cuando puedas revisa este 
"Añadir referencias sobre este lugar"="transition"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429476938
no sé si es un fixme o de otro elemento por lo de "transition"
kapazao (2025-12-08 21:44:13+00:00): Sí, ya me di cuenta, gracias :)
rskedgell (2025-12-09 23:38:46+00:00): These are bus lanes, which are mapped using tags on the road. Don't add pretend roads where no physical separation exists between lanes and don't add fictitious guided busways anywhere, ever.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-07 22:51:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10766675478

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Hypsometric (2026-01-17 12:33:45+00:00): Please see the wiki on language-specific names (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Language-specific_names). The correct way to tag this would be with name=*, name:en=*, and name:oj=*. Depending on the use of the language by the tribe, name=* may be Ojibwe (roman or syllabics). In other cases it may be English.

There are some tribes that have street signs in Ojibwe with English subtext. In that case, it would make sense to use the name that is signed.

In Cass Lake (as well as others in MN), English is the primary language. So signs are in English with a subtext of Ojibwe.

For Cass Lake, it would make the most sense to use name=Cass Lake with the respective language tags.
NeisBot (2025-12-14 07:51:07+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Hotel e Ristorante Corte dal Castello a Colà di Lazise sul Lago di Garda"
---
Ad esempio, una versione più neutra e fattuale della tua descrizione potrebbe essere: "Hotel e Ristorante Corte dal Castello a Colà di Lazise sul Lago di Garda"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
dknelson9876 (2025-12-08 03:53:41+00:00): Hi MadCat, is the new development next to the school being named after the school directly, or did you mean to put the name on the school landuse instead?
MadCat3D (2025-12-08 03:57:01+00:00): nope, that was a mistake, not sure how I did that but I will fix that, thanks for pointing that out.