piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jaap de vries (2025-02-06 08:18:10+00:00): Dat betreft bij los staande boomobjecten in parken of lanen of bij bijzondere bomen niet in beheerd bosgebieden waar deze ondervallen.
Verander je het even ?
eggie (2025-02-03 21:58:56+00:00): Commentaar moet zijn naam pad toegevoegd
philippec (2025-02-04 00:05:59+00:00): Met location wordt bedoeld de plaats binnen het hotel.
Peter Nuiten (2025-02-04 07:18:24+00:00): Bij binnenkomst aan linkerzijde voor de bagageruimte.
philippec (2025-02-04 09:51:51+00:00): Ik heb het afdak en de entrance getekend en de aed overeenkomstig verplaatst.
NeisBot (2025-02-06 10:34:32+00:00): Hi Alex_FZS, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over the last days and weeks, you've made at least 181 with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Strubbl (2025-04-24 14:53:56+00:00): Hi sixsixfive, das Ottilienbad ist bereits seit 15 Jahren auf dem Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42871445 erfasst. Ich stelle den Adressnode wieder her und schiebe die neuen Infos von dir auf das Gebäude mit. Beim Namen bin ich mir unsicher. Ich würde aber dazu tendieren, das "Suhl" im name wegzulassen.
Viele Grüße
❤️‍🔥 (2025-02-04 08:37:34+00:00): hey, there are some inconsistent speed limits around https://osm.org/way/230525503 now, do you know what the correct value should be? Looks like it's 30: https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=8f0287bd-bf30-445b-8965-bfefb700de5c&cp=-36.861905~174.771079&lvl=17&dir=11.019222&pi=0.0022026114&style=x&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027
Colemagoo (2025-02-04 08:44:20+00:00): It's not clearly signed, as far as I can see, but AT's speed limit map seems think that everything except Domain Dr is still 50kmh.

https://data-atgis.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/ATgis::speed-limits/explore?style=ns_speed_limit
❤️‍🔥 (2025-02-05 07:24:50+00:00): hmm weird, I've opened a note to follow up on this: https://osm.org/note/4614501
rivermont (2025-02-22 04:30:31+00:00): What imagery did you use to determine bridge was the 'correct' tagging?
DWTXL (2025-02-24 17:22:06+00:00): Street level imagery shows an Arched Bridge like many on the BRPW and not a tunnel.
rivermont (2025-02-25 01:10:10+00:00): I would 100% call what is here a tunnel but ok. I have merged the extra ways created.
DWTXL (2025-02-26 20:29:29+00:00): It is a bit in the middle. It is a structure erected over a roadway, not a roadway carved through earth. It's honestly not such an important distinction one way or another for this. Absolutely ok with keeping it a tunnel and follow the lead of those more experienced OSM. Thank you
CurlingMan13 (2025-02-05 01:34:42+00:00): Is this construction, or just an empty lot?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356526573
felipeeugenio (2025-02-04 18:04:59+00:00): Hola Jonatan.
Una cosa es el nombre de un camino, otra cosa es el rol de un camino y otra cosa distinta es si el MOP las tiene en su base de datos actualizada.
Lamentablemente confundiste las tres.
Las rutas 212 y 188 ya no existen como tales en las bases de datos del MOP. Y aunque existiteran, el que se llamen así con el tag name= es otra historia.

Por último, la 210 es conocida como acceso a Quintero, por lo que no amerita cambiarle el nombre.

Por esto, todas tus ediciones fueron reversadas. Sin embargo dejo Ruta 210 como nombre alternativo en el acceso a Quintero.
Gracias
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 01:27:22+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165050719
dpolovinkin (2025-03-24 08:49:12+00:00): hi, please fix problems which your alleys introduced (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356532147), crosses a lot of buildings around there, thx. It's a good practice to not commit anything if there are issues highlighted
_varman_ (2025-03-24 09:34:39+00:00): noted. I have updated and tidied up buildings and alleys
dpolovinkin (2025-03-24 09:59:59+00:00): thanks! :)
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-05 23:31:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162186905 where the changeset comment is: fix coastline around adriatic sea, revert boundary imports that broke it
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 01:27:23+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165050719
NeisBot (2025-02-08 08:06:07+00:00): Hi bananapan, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 46 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
b-jazz (2025-02-05 21:32:10+00:00): Great looking golf course edits there Jraps. Thanks.

If you're looking for other ways to improve them, you could combine the fairways and greens by selecting the fairway and then holding shift while selecting the green and then press 'c' to "Merge" them into a multipolygon whenever the fairway wraps completely around the green.
muralito (2025-02-04 12:10:27+00:00): Hola. La convención es que las rutas siguen la clasificacion de jerarquia del MTOP, asi que la ruta 50 es red terciaria según el MTOP, entonces se clasifica como tertiary en OSM.
muralito (2025-02-04 12:08:58+00:00): Hola. ¿En que te basas para cambiar la clasificación de estas avenidas?
FacundoGvel (2025-02-12 02:58:29+00:00): Para la categoría me basé en la descripción de OSM (wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway=tertiary). Tertiary no me parecía el más adecuado de acuerdo a la función de esas avenidas, aunque admito que es discutible.  Baltasar Brum tiene una función mucho más residencial y con tráfico moderado a bajo. Aparicio Saravia es más "comercial" y aunque también tiene función residencial, podría llegar a ser tertiary.
La entrada en la wiki de Uruguay es bastante vaga al respecto, pero si tenés a mano algún estándar pasame y voy arreglando!
muralito (2025-02-12 12:25:23+00:00): Si, la definición para Uruguay es la de la wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Uruguay , está para mejorar y son bienvenidas las propuestas.

Lo comercial no se toma en cuenta, se toma la jerarquia vial. En este caso, la avenida Brum tiene prioridad sobre las transversales, por lo que seria correcto jerarquizarla como "tertiary". Aparicio Saravia en esas cuadras probablemente tambien por un tema de continuidad.

Para mi, viendo las fotos aereas y como esta estructurado eso serían "tertiary", pero si entendiste el criterio que usamos, y sumando a eso tu conocimiento local de la zona, te parece ponerla como "residential" está bien.

Ojo con las traducciones, que entre ingles y OSM y español no son directas,  el "residential" de OSM no es el mismo significado de "residencial" que normalmente usamos en Uruguay que tiene mas que ver con el nivel socioeconomico del barrio, y asi con muchos otros terminos.
Baloo Uriza (2025-02-05 21:52:07+00:00): You can save yourself some serious time drawing by reusing lines instead of drawing over lines.  In order to make several lines a single object, you would need to make a multipolygon relation.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

You can find working examples of this at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18643736 and surrounding vicinity.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162107843
adiatmad (2025-02-10 07:58:00+00:00): Halo Bang Ezagren, sepertinya ini gak sengaja naruh lokasinya di Kutub. Mohon dicek ya. Terima kasih

>> https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/12555113908
Ezagren (2025-02-10 08:07:41+00:00): Waduh, sepertinya memang demikian tidak sengaja. Saya sedang tidak aktif di JOSM saat ini. Mungkin akan saya perbaiki nanti atau kalau boleh adiatmad dapat membantu menghapusnya.
adiatmad (2025-02-10 08:55:56+00:00): Siap bang. Sudah saya bantu hapus. Terima kasih
riaannais (2025-02-04 03:46:14+00:00): attaubah
berndw (2025-02-04 08:39:25+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4613171
rskedgell (2025-02-04 12:04:28+00:00): What is your source for the introduction of one way working on Chapter Road between its junctions with Deacon Road.

There does not appear to be a relevant traffic order in The Gazette
https://www.thegazette.co.uk/all-notices/notice?text=%22Chapter+Road%22&categorycode=G208040000&noticetypes=&location-postcode-1=&location-distance-1=1&location-local-authority-1=The+London+Borough+of+Brent%253ABrent&numberOfLocationSearches=1&start-publish-date=&end-publish-date=&edition=&london-issue=&edinburgh-issue=&belfast-issue=&sort-by=latest-date&results-page-size=100
vineelaa (2025-02-06 15:39:09+00:00): Thanks for reverting the edits. Apologies for the delay in the response and will ensure that these are addressed on priority.
We have looked into the changeset and could identify that the mapper has incorrectly added direction due to ambiguity based on the lane marking which can be seen on satellite imagery. However, that lane marking does not indicate one way, hence the edit done was incorrect,. We have reverted the edit and can be referred in this changeset: 162206660. We have shared the feedback with the mapper and will ensure that the future edits are inline with the guidelines from OSM community platform.
南安南洋南昌 (2025-02-14 09:49:43+00:00): HERE DO COVERED BY WATER
Ra_colate (2025-02-14 17:00:49+00:00): Hi 南安南洋南昌,
Thank you for reaching out to me. I am not clear on the issue you are commenting on so it would be very helpful if you could provide further information to provide that clarity.  The edit I made was to convert this polygon from a multipolygon to a simple polygon and removed the relation.  I also added the natural=water tag because as per wiki guideline the single member shouldn't be in multipoloygon relation. 

I look forward to hearing back from you.
micheleOSM3 (2026-01-11 07:21:38+00:00): The tag name should be set to a real name, the value you set where did you find it?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 01:27:24+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165050719
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mos_next_door (2025-02-04 07:20:50+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162112870
Please only add features existing in reality.
rskedgell (2025-02-04 11:57:07+00:00): What is your source for the introduction of one way working at the SE end of Queen's Road?
vineelaa (2025-02-06 15:27:51+00:00): Thanks for reverting the edits. Apologies for the delay in the response and will ensure that these are addressed on priority.
We have looked into the changeset and could identify that the mapper has incorrectly added direction due to ambiguity based on the lane marking which can be seen on satellite imagery. However, that lane marking does not indicate it as one way, hence the edit done was incorrect. We have reverted the edit and can be referred in this changeset: 162206421. We have shared the feedback with the mapper and will ensure that the future edits are inline with the guidelines from OSM community platform.
rskedgell (2025-02-06 15:39:39+00:00): Thanks!
map per (2025-02-04 12:14:05+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
s777n (2025-02-04 19:47:38+00:00): Если здание с прямыми углами пожалуйста не забывайте нажать Q чтобы выпрямить его.

Выпрямил здание и добавил адрес.
eggie (2025-02-04 07:38:47+00:00): Dag Dirk..  Het adres heb ik weer verwijderd en de info overgezet naar de adresnode. 
We gebruiken uitsluitend de adresnodes om bedrijven op bij te taggen.
MVG
eggie
Piskvor (2025-02-04 08:03:11+00:00): Note se zdá být od jiného boxu, tady je na webu "Z-BOX se nachází před pizzerií PRIMA." Upraveno.
lenochod (2025-02-04 11:22:11+00:00): Aha, koukám že jsem se uklikl a dal tam note z jiného Boxu. Díky moc za upozornění a opravu.
rskedgell (2025-02-04 11:51:15+00:00): I cannot find a traffic order reversing the direction of the one way working in Ryder Street. What is your source for this?
vineelaa (2025-02-06 11:50:07+00:00): Aplogies for the delay in the response and will ensure that these are addressed on priority.
We have looked into the changeset and the edit done was true to ground reality https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=51.507183%7E-0.137638&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=1&pi=-14.3&style=x&dir=276.6, and this is alternative way of tagging directions which is not used very often https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway=-1 hence we have revised the syntax but retained the edit.
Thanks!
rskedgell (2025-02-06 11:52:23+00:00): That's great, thanks for providing confirmation so quickly.
MelihCelik (2025-02-04 11:34:15+00:00): im sorry i was trying to export some custom roads and merge them for test purpose :(
mos_next_door (2025-02-06 09:27:52+00:00): Ok, no worries. Careful next time :)
citrula (2025-02-04 09:18:15+00:00): Does this business have a public presence at this location?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162116556
eggie (2025-02-04 07:46:43+00:00): Beste Thijmen Hoe kan nu een adresnode van adres veranderen op dezelfde locatie?
Volta is toch ergens anders.
Procedure is de adresnode leegmaken op de BAG gegevens na en op de nieuwe locatie het verhuisde bedrijf weer bijtaggen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-04 07:47:54+00:00): reverted by changeset #162113648
eggie (2025-02-04 07:48:13+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162113368
eggie (2025-02-04 07:54:46+00:00): Bedrijf op nieuwe locatie toegevoegd
Groet
eggie
Lezurex (2025-02-04 20:35:35+00:00): Hi Mark Hillen,

Thanks for your contributions so far.

If a place closes we usually don't delete it, but we mark it as disused. This way, the history of the node remains and mappers passing by in the future notice that something is missing here.

So, next time, please mark it as disused and not just delete it. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix for further info.

Happy Mapping
Lezurex
Tomasz Buchholz (2025-02-04 08:36:01+00:00): source=survey
eggie (2025-02-04 10:12:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
b-jazz (2025-02-05 19:01:22+00:00): Hi there NK,

Thanks for helping to clean up this golf course. I wanted to point out a small problem what the change you made with the fairway and green that intersected at the north end of this change. 

If you take a look at the images in this wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls ...
you'll see that the fairway should either butt up against the green or wrap around it (with a gap for the fringe). You wrapped around the green but shared nodes and that will cause problems with editing software (JOSM is one I know of) that doesn't allow that type of construct.

Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162114092
NK Whitla (2025-02-06 00:19:25+00:00): Hey b-jazz, 

Thanks for the information on golf course data structuring. I haven't really found myself working on a golf course before, so I wasn't 100% sure on what to do here. I'll correct this error and make note of how these should be drawn.

I can see you do a lot of research and review on golf courses in OSM from your profile, if you could let me know of any additional errors as I move forward with my block update project here that would be great!

Thanks
b-jazz (2025-02-06 07:32:21+00:00): Thanks for going back and fixing them up. Much appreciated! I'll be sure and point out any other issues I notice.
TrickyFoxy (2025-02-11 01:25:44+00:00): Использовать яндекс.карты для правок в OSM нельзя. Откачено

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162373083
eggie (2025-02-04 10:14:21+00:00): Dag Robbert... Wanneer een bedrijf sluit graag de adresnodes intact laten.

MVG eggie
eggie (2025-02-04 10:19:24+00:00): adres hersteld
❤️‍🔥 (2025-02-04 08:32:50+00:00): Hi, if you're going around and removing deprecated tags, I suggest removing all at once; attribution and source_ref are also considered obsolete
kevko22 (2025-02-04 08:53:47+00:00): Okay, i will remove the other tags, i didn't know they were obsolete as well. thank you for telling me
MichaelFS (2025-02-04 11:12:04+00:00): Hallo FirefighterCGH,

ich verstehe Deinen Beweggrund, aber gemäß Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant soll explizit die Einheit mit angegeben werden.
FirefighterCGH (2025-02-04 12:49:05+00:00): Hallo,
wo genau steht das auf der Seite? Da steht nur "numerischer Wert in mm oder Zoll". Numerisch meint eigentlich nur Zahlen und bei diameter wird mm impliziert, wodurch die Einheit überflüssig wird.  In https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:fire_hydrant:diameter steht auch, dass mm impliziert wird.
Aber vor allem findet man bei fast allen von den knapp 800.000 Hydranten in Deutschland keine Einheit, was sich anscheinend im Rest der Welt auch so verhält wenn man auf https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/fire_hydrant%3Adiameter nachschaut. Auf den Hinweisschildern und offiziellen Karten wird ja auch aus Platzgründen die Einheit weggelassen.
MichaelFS (2025-02-04 16:54:44+00:00): OK, die Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant ist m.E. widersprüchlich:
couplings:diameters=* z.B. = 45 mm
fire_hydrant:diameter=* mit (Numerischer Wert) in mm oder Zoll
Deine Änderungen sind also OK, vielleicht magst Du die Wiki-Seite verbessern?
Mazda05 (2025-02-04 14:15:06+00:00): Ніякого вандалізму немає.

Пункти пропуску Новоазовськ та Успенка: рішення Кабінета Міністрів України №94 від 12.11.2014 №94 "Про припинення руху в пунктах пропуску через державний кордон в Донецькій області для автомобільного сполучення "Успенка — Матвєєв Курган", "Новоазовськ – Весело-Вознесенка" та для залізничного сполучення "Квашине – Успенська""

Пункт пропуску Должанський: рішення Кабінету Міністрів України від 05.06.2014 "Щодо припинення руху через деякі пункти пропуску на кордоні з Російською Федерацією"
luiswoo (2025-02-04 14:36:39+00:00): Это было филькиной грамотой не имеющей ни чего общего с положением дел на земле, по факту. Так что это махровый вандализм.
Mazda05 (2025-02-04 14:57:02+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
ivanbranco (2025-02-05 10:29:16+00:00): Hi Francesco,

are they really called Flowerbeds-01, Flowerbeds-02 ecc. are these names signposted?

thanks and good mapping
Francesco Biral (2025-02-05 11:07:50+00:00): Hi, actually I just translated into English the Italian name I give to this elements. I need to create a very detailed map of the area and if you have suggestions for the naming convention I am open to discussion
ivanbranco (2025-02-05 11:16:30+00:00): The naming convention is that names are not descriptions: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

names should be added only if they are official or signposted or locally used ecc.
ivanbranco (2025-02-05 11:16:54+00:00): If an element doesn't have a name is perfectly fine to leave the name field empty
bison166 (2025-02-05 13:44:03+00:00): Hi  OpenStreetBoy, mich interessiert mal, wo du die Straßenschlüssel her bekommst ?  Was ist der Sinn des Mappings für OSM ? lerne ja gerne dazu.
Gruß
user_18023081 (2025-02-05 20:10:54+00:00): Did you travel across the world just to change a few shop names?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-06 03:37:24+00:00): what is the actual source for this edit?

Please, use SCEE and StreetComplete only for survey - not for remote editing
TrickyFoxy (2025-02-11 01:25:45+00:00): Использовать яндекс.карты для правок в OSM нельзя. Откачено

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162373083
philippec (2025-02-04 10:04:01+00:00): U hebt op een copie ? van een aed gewerkt en het origineel verborgen.  Ik heb het verbterd.
Smajser (2025-03-12 18:02:08+00:00): Pozdrav,
bivša "Komercijalna banka" je sada "NLB Komercijalna banka"
Zenfiric (2025-03-17 11:03:05+00:00): Ааа, нисам знао. Променићу у НСИ
pitfire (2025-02-04 11:31:52+00:00): Hallo FKastel,

bitte keine Wege, die eindeutig nicht auf ihrer gesamten Länge dem Kriterium "access=no" entsprechen ausstatten. 

access=no bedeutet:

Kein Zugang für die breite Öffentlichkeit (Benutzung nicht erlaubt.) Stärkeres Verbot als private. Beispiele: eine vollständig gesperrte Straße; eine gesperrte Militäreinrichtung.

Der Weg ist eindeutig auf den Geoportalen NRW einsehbar.
Einschränkungen bezüglich der Nutzung erfolgt mit entsprechender Beschilderung.
Siehe auch:
Für Privatwald-Besitzende und Wald-Nutzende regelt Kapitel 2 des BWaldG § 14 das Betreten des Waldes. Hierin heißt es: Das Betreten des Waldes zum Zwecke der Erholung ist gestattet

MfG pitfire
rskedgell (2025-02-04 11:26:10+00:00): This isn't a dual carriageway, as the lane separation is mostly a painted area, not a physical barrier.

By all means split the carriageway around the crossing islands, but if you're going to do that you need to make sure that traffic signals, crossings and bus stops are mapped correctly.

Do you need any help to revert this changeset?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway
rskedgell (2025-02-06 10:08:10+00:00): No response to changeset comment, reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162200736
vineelaa (2025-02-06 11:43:10+00:00): Thanks for reverting the edits. Aplogies for the delay in the response and will ensure that these are addressed on priority.
We have looked into the changeset and could identify that the mapper has missed on modifying the traffic signal while creating the Carriage Way on this segment. The mapper was onboarded on 2023 onto OSM platform, however recently starting working on OSM. From ourside, we have sensitized the feedback with the mapper and will ensure the mapper will not be doing any further edit on OSM until the mapper is fully trained in the region and rules. We will ensure that these kind of incorrect edits is not done in future.
rskedgell (2025-02-06 11:50:29+00:00): Hi @vineela and thanks for the response. Please could you also ask the mapper to reply to my comments on changesets creating or reversing one way streets. These are not necessarily incorrect, as I realise that your mappers have access to driver feedback in addition to the sources available to me. In general, changes to one way working require traffic orders which are usually (for permanent changes made by London councils) published in The Gazette under the OSM-compatible Open Government Licence.
vineelaa (2025-02-06 12:26:18+00:00): Thank you for the quick response. To ensure that there is no further delay in acknowledging the feedback shared by you, I have responded on behalf of the mapper as she is on timeoff for the day. As correctly said by you, while we have access to the driver feedbacks, we proritize editing in accordance to the guidelines shared on OSM community platform. In this changeset, based on deep dive, we have observed that this is a miss made by the mapper due to knowledge gap as she is newly onboarded on these specific set of edits related to Carriage way. Going forward, we will ensure all our mappers are contributing to OSM only when they have evidences supporting their edit based on the resources available on OSM.

Once the mapper is back, we will have her respond and acknowledge to your feedback.