piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Sankale (2025-03-20 05:50:37+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for reaching out! The public schools I uploaded were sourced from a survey conducted by the Ministry of Education. The data was collected through on-the-ground assessments and official records from the ministry. I have carefully reviewed and formatted the data to align with OSM guidelines before uploading it.

Please let me know if you have any concerns or if any adjustments are needed.

Best regards,
Peter Sankale.
NeisReview (2025-03-21 07:07:18+00:00): Thank you for your answer.

Wouldn't it have made more sense to pay attention to the capitalization of the names? Now everything is simply capitalized.

In addition, several schools were entered at one coordinate/location in a few random samples. Wouldn't it have made sense to use tagging in a different way?
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2025-05-31 02:33:17+00:00): المحامة حسب الواقع الفعلي وصور الأقمار الصناعية لا تتعدى عن تصنيفها قرية صغيرة:  
place=hamlet  
  
ولقد قمت أنت بتغييرها أكثر من 13 مرة، نرجوا منك عدم تغييرها مرة أخرى، وهذه السلوكيات لا تفيد ومضرة بالخريطة العامة التي يستخدمها الجميع !
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2025-05-31 02:36:26+00:00): وقمت بتنبيهك سابقاً عن ذلك هنا:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160367913  
وهنا:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161215552
Aleksandar1994 (2025-03-19 13:36:08+00:00): Hi Sebastian Wallroth
      
You added a segment to the Stadtmitte boundary, but the relation is not closed. If you have local knowledge, could you please fix this issue? 
Thanks!
Hufkratzer (2025-03-19 18:47:15+00:00): Hi,
am I right in thinking that you accidentally used the wrong tags for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1369109872 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1369109868? These areas could possibly be riding arenas, similar to the ones on the farm https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506268793, where you tagged them with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian (which corresponds to the OSM wiki, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding).
flohoff (2025-03-25 12:57:36+00:00): Hi,
either this changeset is incomplete or plain wrong.

You renamed the bus stop but not the stop position - So now we have a stop with "Robert" and position with "Robbert"

I tend to believe that Robbert is the correct name 

See the Bus Plan - The stop is called Robbert.

https://www.vgb-mob.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/vgb_bus_fahrplan_t21.pdf

You should be more careful in changing stuff without local knowledge.

Flo
DD1GJ (2025-03-19 12:47:27+00:00): Please do not use information from Google Maps to update OpenStreetMap.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google
Anim Mouse (2025-03-19 12:14:14+00:00): I wish this is true; this will greatly improve travel times.
vasqaa (2025-03-19 13:19:22+00:00): please play cities: skylines instead of altering the actual map of the areas involved, especially because these maps are used by other sites/media as reference and could therefore cause issues. As much as this is an amazing idea, the philippine government is too selfish and corrupt to have such a project come to fruition.
NeisReview (2025-03-19 17:39:35+00:00): #HighwayChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

In this changeset, some types of highway are being added or modified by you. 

Could we know the sources that you used? Thank you.

More information about the changeset: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163814185
uᴉʍOꓨ (2025-03-19 23:47:27+00:00): If you enjoy doing edits like this, you're probably better off using https://opengeofiction.net . Fictional edits, however, is not appropriate for OpenStreetMap (OSM)

As you may know, OpenStreetMap data is intended to record data based on what's on the ground. And we have emergency services, and regular folks who rely on OpenStreetMap data for navigation and maps.

If you're interested in knowing more, checkout https://welcome.openstreetmap.org.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-20 01:44:50+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17418
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 02:09:39+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164838630
olo81 (2025-04-02 06:33:33+00:00): nazwa opisowa do poprawy https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-07 05:33:49+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164616497
NieWnen (2025-03-19 17:11:54+00:00): Odnośnie `service=driveway`, to te dodajemy zazwyczaj, gdy droga prowadzi do konkretnego obiektu. 
Jak prowadzi do wielu obiektów, to zostawienie highway=service bez service=* jest OK.
mwk3 (2025-03-19 18:46:42+00:00): Wycofałem zmianę.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163831150

Dzięki! :)
KöWiMM (2025-04-07 04:41:52+00:00): Lieber Heiner Schäfer,
ich hatte erst auch 'razed' in Erwägung gezogen, aber:
Consider using more popular demolished:building=* instead of this key, it has exactly the same meaning. Additionally "razed" is less well known word than "demolished", especially among people using English as secondary language. Additionally "razed" and more popular word "raised" sound very similar leading to an additional confusion.
HeinerSchaefer (2025-04-08 19:12:11+00:00): Hallo,
habe jetzt nochmal im OSMwiki nachgelesen. Und in der Tat kann man demolished und razed wohl austauschen. 
Ich habe mir angewöhnt für abgerissene Gebäude razed zu benutzen. Daher meine Änderung an den Daten der alten Scheune.
Wir können das so lassen, oder es wieder auf demolished ändern. Ist mir beides recht.

Grüße
Heiner
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-10 09:55:04+00:00): Split Brownstone Law - Winter Park SEO spam POI details from building and clean up tags in changeset 183914684

https://osm.org/changeset/183914684
nevw (2025-03-23 21:57:09+00:00): Hi, the wooded areas need more work.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.41238&lat=-37.92828&zoom=17
It seems to me that this relation needs to be completed
Alafoss (2025-03-23 22:06:17+00:00): Thanks for the hint, I'll fix it later today. Cheers
Hung Tran 9x0 (2025-03-30 05:03:54+00:00): Did you actually travel through this road? The road doesn't look like your edit.
Hung Tran 9x0 (2025-03-30 05:12:58+00:00): The end of the road is right before Vĩnh , which is how I edited.
Hung Tran 9x0 (2025-03-30 05:13:29+00:00): right before Vĩnh Hưng Street
stosh77 (2025-04-27 15:38:52+00:00): revised.
BCNorwich (2025-03-19 15:05:44+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Could you say where exactly the AED is situated? Is it fixed to a wall? Seen from the road? Near the corner front of building, side of building? Available 24/7?

Regards Bernard.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 02:29:29+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164658060
Mannivu (2025-03-20 16:58:40+00:00): D'accordo che la rotatoria è da rifare, ma perché hai eliminato una service way esistente (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356457595)?
Pucciotrex30 (2025-03-21 08:15:42+00:00): Perchè non c'è più
Mannivu (2025-03-21 09:50:57+00:00): Quel tratto di strada esiste ed è, al momento, l'unica uscita dal parcheggio sotterraneo (la percorro praticamente tutte le settimane)
Mannivu (2025-03-21 18:49:27+00:00): Ripristinata

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163920442
felipeeugenio (2025-03-19 15:59:18+00:00):  + Bing
dadavid (2025-04-16 14:11:04+00:00): Ist die Baustelle jetzt ganz weg? Hier sind noch Abbiegebeschränkungen und access=no und so übrig, zb hier 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34697390

Viele Grüße

David
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-07 06:40:15+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164618342
IrynaStaradub (2025-03-19 12:58:30+00:00): Also fixed geometry of the road
Udarian (2025-03-20 01:49:45+00:00): is the piece of sidewalk under construction a completely different parallel segment to the already mapped one, or is part of the already mapped segment parallel under construction?

happy mapping,
Udar
TrickyFoxy (2025-03-19 17:49:37+00:00): 👋 Не сокращайте слово «озеро»
eggie (2025-03-19 15:29:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Zou de tijdelijke plek van een dixie in OSM thuishoren?
Ik heb mijn twijfels.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
GeorgeKaplan (2025-06-10 07:56:31+00:00): Bonjour, une voie verte se cartographie ainsi : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dpath
Merci de ne pas les repasser en pistes cyclables.
Fjavion (2026-04-11 20:59:21+00:00): This change is not correct and could be classified as Tagging for the renderer. If the search issue with the application persists, please report it to the app developer.
Minsario (2025-03-23 23:41:09+00:00): Mind explaining why you downgraded the status of this railroad, but not the LIRC? By definition, it IS a main line. It has a few branches of its own system, though.
Minsario (2025-03-23 23:42:48+00:00): Clarifying: INRD Indianapolis sub is considered a main line
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 03:05:13+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164573389
ivanbranco (2025-05-04 11:03:02+00:00): Ciao, la rimozione di amenity=cafe é voluta? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9291372561

Chiedo perché il posto ha "Coffee" nel nome
evillz (2025-05-04 13:03:54+00:00): Il luogo è un piccolo chiosco in legno, adibito a bar. Se pensi che sia meglio usare amenity=cafe ben venga.
Famlam (2025-03-21 23:16:26+00:00): Hi Rubenke, er zijn nu twee knopen met noexit (id 43895846 en 43892502) welke wel degelijk een exit ingetekend hebben. Haal je noexit eraf of ontkoppel je de weg?
silversurfer83 (2025-03-21 19:45:10+00:00): Moin :)

bei "building=" setzen wir einen Wert, der beschreibt, wofür das Gebäude, so wie es steht, gebaut wurde. Um eine anderweite Gesamtnutzung anzugeben haben wir "building:use="

Wenn ich mir die Liegenschaftskarte ansehe, weiß ich nicht, ob ich mit der Adresse des Gebäudes so ganz einverstanden bin. Gibt es irgendwo Quellen, dass die Stadt Wabern hier etwas für die Firma umbenannt hat?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163818271
eggie (2025-03-19 15:30:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
superkiria (2025-03-28 17:14:27+00:00): Не следует добавлять слово СНТ в название allotments. Во-первых, это не часть названия, во-вторых, это сокращение, в третьих не все allotments, которые здесь помечены как СНТ действительно являются СНТ, некоторые - СТ или другие аббревиатуры. Смотри вики https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
Elizen (2025-03-31 09:33:02+00:00): Здравствуйте.
1, 2, 3. Насчёт name спорить с вами не буду, т.к. насколько я знаю, у сообщества нет единого мнения насчёт наименований у СНТ. Информация о статусе СНТ была взята из ФИАС.
4. Почему вы удалили тег place? Данные территории не относятся к населённому пункту и внутри них существует адресация по СНТ. Для этого нужен тег place=allotments:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:place%3Dallotments
superkiria (2025-03-31 19:32:12+00:00): Да, place зря убрал. Верну.
eggie (2025-03-19 15:32:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
matheusgomesms (2025-05-26 16:37:19+00:00): Oi @danctc, tudo bem?

Esse changeset criou vários pontos sem nenhuma informação. Está correto isso?

Parece que você tentou importar algo, mas saiu os pontos isolados e não conectados como área.

Att,
Matheus
danctc (2025-05-27 13:31:03+00:00): Olá, isso mesmo. Como foi muito grande acabou não indo. Estou revertendo
dypa (2025-03-21 18:24:57+00:00): При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra

Пожалуйста при внесении следующих правок используйте теги (Размеченный (нерегулируемый) пешеходный переход)
crossing=uncontrolled
crossing:markings=zebra

Заранее спасибо!
mcconner22 (2025-03-19 13:53:03+00:00): Since this is so new I only added it using my GPS trace, no aerial imagery. May need to come back and make slight adjustments to the points once there is more data.
mcconner22 (2025-03-19 13:53:54+00:00): Additionally - this path also goes north of 19 mile and has a few "connectors" that go to side streets, however I don't have a GPS trace those yet. Hope to get one soon in which case I can add those too
Stalker61 (2025-03-21 18:13:02+00:00): А какого лешего статусы дорог задираешь выше крыши?
Stalker61 (2025-03-21 18:19:22+00:00): Вот про такой ключ когда-нибудь слышал?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination
Stalker61 (2025-03-21 18:48:38+00:00): Здесь можешь посмотреть применение тега destination https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/55.497965/65.389633
Yourice (2025-05-06 15:31:28+00:00): I assume the information board (node: 12681066392) you added in the greenhouse of plantentuin UGent is indoors?
tuti_mapia (2025-05-06 15:46:08+00:00): Indeed, I have added the relation that it's indoor. I'm still getting the hang of it
Yourice (2025-05-06 15:48:20+00:00): Perfect :), glad you improved the plantentuin
Frank Peng (2025-12-19 22:02:49+00:00): Please save and upload you changes in one area before moving on to another.
Frank Peng (2025-12-19 22:03:09+00:00): Please save and upload your changes in one area before moving on to another.
tastrax (2025-03-22 10:04:35+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
janesk (2025-03-22 10:07:26+00:00): Oh cheers, did that with the last payphone I added but it totally slipped my mind here. Thanks for fixing.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 03:08:41+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164573420
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-21 04:48:54+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17429
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-21 04:49:33+00:00): Reverted by DWG - apparent vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163888294
AnaVrbica (2025-04-13 10:39:25+00:00): Reverted because of a node added

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164888264
G4rden3r (2025-06-19 09:44:35+00:00): Moin, baust du die Buslinien in Horner Rennbahn auch wieder zurück?
Den Ersatzverkehr hast du ja auch gelöscht.

VG
G4rden3r
silversurfer83 (2025-03-21 19:21:48+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap Lieutenant Commander,

danke, dass du hilfst die Datenbank aktuell zu halten.

Bei Fragen rund um OSM kannst du dich zb an das Wiki unter wiki.osm.org oder die Community im Forum unter c.osm.org wenden. Außerdem gibt es diverse Chatgruppen (Liste im Wiki).

happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163820958
NeisReview (2025-03-19 17:58:48+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
Patchi (2025-03-20 06:20:35+00:00): Bonjour sigccsc,

Pas vraiment d'accord avec le changement de nom effectué dans ce groupe de modifications.
Il est d'usage de séparer le nom d'une voie et sa référence (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:%C3%89l%C3%A9ments_cartographiques#Route_(highway)).
Donc faire passer les voies de 
* name=Avenue d'Orange
* ref=D 907
à 
* name=D 907 (Avenue d'Orange)
* ref=D 907
n'a que peu de sens.

Bonne continuation,

Patchi.
Patchi (2025-03-20 18:14:14+00:00): Bonjour sigccsc,

Pas vraiment d'accord avec le changement de nom effectué dans ce groupe de modifications.
Il est d'usage de séparer le nom d'une voie et sa référence (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:%C3%89l%C3%A9ments_cartographiques#Route_(highway)).
Donc faire passer les voies de
- name=Avenue d'Orange
- ref=D 907
à
- name=D 907 (Avenue d'Orange)
- ref=D 907
n'a que peu de sens.

Bonne continuation,

Patchi.
Patchi (2025-03-20 18:14:41+00:00): Bonjour sigccsc,

Pas vraiment d'accord avec le changement de nom effectué dans ce groupe de modifications.
Il est d'usage de séparer le nom d'une voie et sa référence (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:%C3%89l%C3%A9ments_cartographiques#Route_(highway)).
Donc faire passer les voies de
- name=Avenue d'Orange
- ref=D 907
à
- name=D 907 (Avenue d'Orange)
- ref=D 907
n'a que peu de sens.

Bonne continuation,

Patchi.
sigccsc (2025-03-21 07:20:13+00:00): Bonjour Patchi,

Merci pour votre remarque. En effet, mais le problème est que l'Avenue d'orange (D907) dait doublon dans le nom avec l'Avenue d'Orange qui passe dans le centre ville de Sorgues (id_interne 84129V000204). C'est pour éviter d'avoir 2 voiries avec le même nom et un id_interne différent que j'ai effectué ce changement.
En effet sans cela je me retrouve avec une Avenue d'Orange id_interne 84129V000090 (la RD907) et une Avenue d'Orange id_interne 84129V000204!
Que proposez vous?
Patchi (2025-03-21 18:29:11+00:00): Bonjour sigccsc,

Merci pour votre réponse.
Il n'y a que je sache aucune contrainte dans OSM pour que la combinaison du nom de la voie et de l'identifiant ref:FR:commune (non standardisé au niveau de OSM monde) soit unique. Donc je ne vois pas trop où est le problème d'avoir une route avec le même nom, mais un 1 identifiant local avec 2 valeurs différentes.

Par contre nous avons une règle de bonne conduite commune pour OSM et la dénomination des voies: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Names#Name_est_juste_le_nom, à savoir que le nom ne devrait contenir que le nom officiel et rien d'autre (et donc pas la référence).

J'espère que vous pourrez trouver une solution de votre côté mais pour ce qui est de OSM à mon humble avis tout est clair.

Bonne continuation,

Patchi.
pb-mapping (2025-03-19 15:15:47+00:00): Intended to write my changeset comment as: Remote edit adding building, parking, and sidewalks at Walk On's in Ridgeland, MS.
Patchi (2025-03-20 18:14:48+00:00): Bonjour sigccsc,

Pas vraiment d'accord avec le changement de nom effectué dans ce groupe de modifications.
Il est d'usage de séparer le nom d'une voie et sa référence (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:%C3%89l%C3%A9ments_cartographiques#Route_(highway)).
Donc faire passer les voies de
- name=Avenue d'Orange
- ref=D 907
à
- name=D 907 (Avenue d'Orange)
- ref=D 907
n'a que peu de sens.

Bonne continuation,

Patchi.
somehundred (2025-03-19 16:53:45+00:00): You still haven't replied to my concern in my previous comment but are repeating the same thing. Please don't delete businesses if they are gone and instead mark them as disused (add disused: prefix before the main key. If it was a shop, it should become disused:shop=). This will let people know what was there in the past if another business opens up in the same place.
iav (2025-03-19 17:44:19+00:00): Is it OSM recommendation? Would you please provide a link to it?

If not — I think this way has very limited profit. If everybody support it, Riga will be filled with hundreds disused shops. 

OSM not an archive.

If anybody want to look into history of a territory — can dig into osm database history.
somehundred (2025-03-19 18:10:14+00:00): What is the "osm database history" you're talking about? I'm not aware of a way to browse OSM history other than changeset history and edit history of individual elements.

I'm not saying we should keep those disused:* nodes forever. We should keep them until a new business appears at the exact same place as the past business, add the new keys on the same node and delete the disused:* key. And if building is demolished, we would delete the disused:* keys along with it.

shop=vacant is an alternative. We could use that instead.

Here are some wiki pages, which encourage to keep the history:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dvacant
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
HellMap (2025-03-19 18:44:02+00:00): I would also add that both disused:*=* and shop=vacant are perfectly valid tagging schemes. One is for a non-obvious location that was closed but might reasonably be expected to reopen as the same or different amenity; while the latter is for an obvious one, like vacant street-facing shops or empty room in a mall that may or may not be reopened. Of course, details vary, but in general shop=vacant are quite obvious as you walk down the street and see a closed venue.
joost schouppe (2025-07-29 11:33:58+00:00): What do you mean the stadium does not exist? OK, it's more like a sports_centre, but is visible on imagery & has a website https://www.rlhsc.be/contact/
NeisBot (2025-03-19 15:33:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
Mariia Artamonova (2025-03-20 12:14:16+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for the feedback! I’ve updated the description to “This is the office of the US-based software development company Infrared5” I hope this meets OSM’s requirements.

Apologies for not including a note about the changes I made this time. I only updated the description. I’ll be more attentive next time.
Mariia Artamonova (2025-03-20 12:19:27+00:00): Nevermind, I actually added the changeset note.
NeisReview (2025-03-28 19:43:43+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163860482
NeisReview (2025-03-20 07:56:45+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges #Test

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
NeisRevert (2025-03-21 20:55:38+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163834286
jcarlson (2025-05-16 23:54:18+00:00): i know this was a minute ago, but regarding your not on the grassland next to the fire station: `landuse=meadow` would be a space designated for pasturing animals or growing hay. this is more likely a `natural=grassland`
somehundred (2025-03-19 16:46:54+00:00): Motoday is already mapped directly nearby.
HellMap (2025-03-19 18:34:14+00:00): Although not documented, a `showroom` https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/showroom tag could be used to indicate that there is a showroom, which is what I assume this edit tried to add?
somehundred (2025-03-19 18:40:39+00:00): When I surveyed this shop, I didn't see any motorcycles inside but only equipment and accessories (see motoday.lt). I didn't know which tags to use for this kind of shop so I just settled for shop=motorcycle.

So no, this isn't a showroom.
map per (2025-03-20 16:12:01+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die OpenStreetMap (OSM) Daten sehen gut aus, aber Apple Maps verwendet in Deutschland keine OSM Daten.
felipeeugenio (2025-03-19 15:58:57+00:00):  + Bing
eggie (2025-03-19 16:57:07+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.

Alleen een naam doet niks in osm.
Wellicht shop=caravan toevoegen.
Mvg..
eggie
eggie (2025-03-19 17:29:52+00:00): aangepast .. zie boven
amber_semwerkt (2025-03-19 18:32:54+00:00): Dankjewel!