piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-03 20:39:32+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157436346
ThatOneFilipinoExtremeist (2024-10-01 14:46:17+00:00): Unfortunately I cannot modify the 19 today, might do later but not possible!
Hufkratzer (2024-09-30 20:28:05+00:00): Hi,
I just want to inform you that I have retagged some riding arenas (and one round pen) that you have recently mapped or updated from leisure=horse_riding to leisure=pitch + equestrian; compare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
glitterbery (2024-10-05 11:46:59+00:00): Why have you changed the name of this feature?
NeisBot (2024-09-30 05:49:17+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the name you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-09-30 09:47:36+00:00): #vandalism

Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157288629
marczoutendijk (2024-09-30 13:59:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16721

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
mcliquid (2024-10-01 14:16:30+00:00): Warum wurde hier nur die Hälfte an Daten gelöscht? Was ist der Hintergrund dafür?
mcliquid (2024-10-06 08:27:26+00:00): Diese Änderungen wurden vollständig zurückgesetzt, da diese unvollständig waren und keine Rückmeldung gegeben wurde.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157528529
esemenko (2024-10-05 06:30:32+00:00): Please do not delete sidewalks for being "redundant". Sidewalks parallel to roads is a perfectly acceptable way to map them. Additionally, it makes them visible from the map itself as opposed to just adding sidewalk tags to the road. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway=sidewalk?uselang=en
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks
DCook87 (2024-10-05 11:15:02+00:00): Why? You've just acknowledged that the proper place for this kind of sidewalk is within the road tag. Footpaths that go beyond paralleling a road need mapping. The sidewalks I removed do not.
esemenko (2024-10-06 22:54:38+00:00): Take a look at Downtown Toronto. Sidewalks are everywhere, paralleling roads or not, with or without separation. By your logic, every single one of those should be deleted for being "redundant". Deleting these sidewalks is a loss of information for no good reason. 

In hindsight, i probably shouldn't have linked the second wiki link, given it has a "dubious information" disclaimer at the top. It at least provides info that there are <1,000 instances of sidewalks being applied to the roadway as opposed to the >5,000,000 instances of separated sidewalks. I think that difference in numbers should more then justify separate sidewalks.
mueschel (2024-10-02 17:22:46+00:00): Hi,
please don't delete existing (and well visible in aerial images) paths on the request of someone. OSM maps what is on the ground, including access restricted paths. You can easily add all the required access tags to mark the paths as not usable by the public.
eggie (2024-09-30 06:15:06+00:00): Dag Willem.. Ik heb tracktype=grade4 toegevoegd.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:tracktype
MVG
eggie
woodpeck (2024-09-30 08:03:05+00:00): Dear user Kenjie Calcita, thank you for your contributions to OSM! You don't need to save each building separately; you can add a few of them and then save together. And then please add a good changeset comment like "added buildings in Jipapad" or so - "." is not a good comment.
Frans S (2024-10-04 10:12:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
A remark about the way high rise or multi-story buildings are often mapped 
On the imagery, you see both the roof and a sidewall (with multiple floors) 
The imagery is taken under a certain degree and shows you the height of a building.
Don't map both the roof and the sidewalls as 1 building.
Draw just the rooflines as a building and move it to the building's footprint.
See this clip.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2024-10-04 10:21:46+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
A remark about the way high rise or multi-story buildings are often mapped 
On the imagery, you see both the roof and a sidewall (with multiple floors) 
The imagery is taken under a certain degree and shows you the height of a building.
Don't map both the roof and the sidewalls as 1 building.
Draw just the rooflines as a building and move it to the building's footprint.
See this clip.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping
Warin61 (2024-10-01 00:31:50+00:00): Hi,
Would it not be 'better' (what ever that means) to join between the natural features to form a closed relation??? At the moment this relation throws errors ..
aharvey (2024-10-01 05:33:54+00:00): Yeah absolutely. I was going to do that, but as a first draft found it easier to just sketch out the rough location first. Improvements welcome.
TheSwavu (2024-10-01 09:51:06+00:00): Hi, 

I've looked at the GNB description. It seems to be a little vague about where the southern boundary.

What do you think about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1319834762 as a candidate?
NeisBot (2024-09-30 06:34:48+00:00): Hello Provinsi Papua Pengunungan, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/12210568690

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=157279610
Provinsi Papua Pengunungan (2024-10-02 00:55:14+00:00): Provinsi, Papua, Pengunungan
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-02 04:56:39+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/157310236
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 01:56:06+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164877077
Herman Lee (2024-09-30 18:25:02+00:00): Some parts of changesets has been reverted, and follow former situation. This area is in disputting, such modification is not proper. Also, the reverted changesets lead to something paradoxical.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-10-01 06:23:09+00:00): Can you please fix the boundaries, now it is even more paradoxical
Herman Lee (2024-10-01 15:48:12+00:00): @Aleksandar Matejevic Maybe can you provide some more information?
okainov (2024-10-01 07:50:24+00:00): Hi
If you're adding a few objects, please split the change at least to country level, touching 9 objects in France and Phillipines in the same changeset is a bit hard to check, please make further changes more localized, thanks!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-30 06:20:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331238931
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1319462930

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Gregory Peony (2024-10-25 21:34:28+00:00): Although the footprints do contain buidings within their boundary, they are oversized and the imagery allows for the orientation of the left most building (WAY: 1319464370) to be more accurate. You can reference Mapbox imagery in this area becasue of it's superior resolution. Thank you for your contribution.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157280926
Gregory Peony (2024-10-25 21:48:21+00:00): I modified the footprints in this changeset and uploaded them in Changeset: 158356082 hopefuly for you to use as a reference/example.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157280926
Gregory Peony (2024-10-25 21:26:11+00:00): All but perhaps one or two building footprints outline buildings. All buildings have been squared. The imagery allows for greater accuracy in the orientation of a few of the buildings in this changeset. For instance WAY: 1319465402, WAY: 1319465412 & WAY: 1319465413. There is a sweet spot called the 'native resolution' where 1 pixel of imagery is assigned to 1 pixel on your screen. It allows you to make the most accurate observations regarding orientation and shape. In JOSM you can right click with imagery loaded and choose the option 'zoom to native resolution' to view at this zoom level. Take a note of what you see, (mental or otherwise) then zoom in to accurately draw buildings on the map. Repeat as necessary. Thank you for your contribution!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157281198
- :\ - (2024-10-22 02:03:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158192591
这里没有鱼 (2024-09-30 07:07:57+00:00): 不要在这里添加只用来测试的数据
Herman Lee (2024-09-30 06:49:33+00:00): 在刚才的上传中可能存在一些冲突，部分的版本可能错误，如果有名称错误，可以再重新修复一下
silversurfer83 (2024-09-30 19:59:39+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Danke, dass du hilfst die Karte aktuell zu halten. Deine Änderungen bisher sehen gar nicht schlecht aus.

Ein, zwei Hinweise bzw. Bitten hätte ich zum Start:

- bitte schreib bessere Kommentare zu deinen Änderungen, da diese allen am Projekt beteiligten helfen. "123" ist nicht hilfreich ;)
Details: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

- du hast schon an ein paar Wegen die Zugangsberechtigungen geändert oder gesetzt. Bei den Grundstückszufahrten dürfte private ganz passend sein. Grundsätzlich solltest du dabei jedoch darauf achten, dass du die rechtlichen Gegebenheiten erfasst und nicht dass, was möglich ist (Beispiel: Ein mieser Weg ist nicht für Fahrräder geeignet. Wenn dort jedoch rein rechtlich Rad gefahren werden darf, bekommt dieser Weg KEIN "bicycle=no".

Bei Fragen immer raus damit und weiter viel Spaß an der Karte

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157281631
Jrachi (2024-10-01 07:55:21+00:00): Ciao.
Sembra che tu abbia interrotto un percorso del catasto regionale (e nazionale).
Non capisco perché hai cancellato il sentiero mettendo poi un fixme=continue sull'ultimo nodo.
Da quel punto il sentiero continua o no?
Se il sentiero è poco visibile e poco frequentato sarebbe meglio lasciarlo sulla mappa aggiungendo il tag trail_visibility.
Se invece il percorso è effettivamente interrotto o la segnaletica locale fa passare il percorso L31, posso segnalare alla SOSEC che potrebbe inviare un rilevatore CAI a verificare l'intero percorso.
Ivo
Jrachi (2024-10-01 08:12:11+00:00): Ciao.
Ti chiedo scusa per l'equivoco.
Ma ricontrollando mi sono accorto che la relazione rispecchiava il percorso teorico mentre il rilevamento ufficiale segue la relazione che ora ho appena corretto.
itineralp (2024-10-01 09:50:55+00:00): Bene, perché quel tratto che ho cancellato era inesistente. Anche il successivo qualche problema ce l'avrebbe, ma si tratta di assenza di manutenzione e non di percorso erroneamente disegnato.
Ciao.
Anton Kasheuski (2024-09-30 15:25:04+00:00): Fixed roads tagging according to OSM wiki and Bing Maps Aerial #mapbox_missing_roads
eggie (2024-09-30 08:43:53+00:00): Dag Enjoy,

Het klopte aardig. Ik heb het gebouw opnieuw uitgelijnd mbv de BGT/Kadaster.
Luchtfoto's vertekenen. 
MVG
eggie
Herman Lee (2024-09-30 18:27:51+00:00): comment on changeset -> 157279997.
Syl (2025-08-11 06:52:02+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai enlevé les liens sur les stations de gonflage qui renvoient vers le site de la métropole. Ils seraient à mettre seulement si il y avait une page qui parlerait de chaque station, ce qui n'est pas le cas ici.
Bonne journée.
jxpsert (2024-09-30 07:49:39+00:00): source + survey
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-12 16:51:07+00:00): Hi AndreaDFC,

Could you not add so many redundant tags to the roads, please?

Kind regards,

Casper
vatlark (2024-09-30 18:25:59+00:00): Oh I'm sorry I didn't realize there was a question. The ramp is not wide enough for a car. The ramp leads to the entrance for Cave 12 which is a bar and music venue. So the ramp probably gets used for stage equipment.
vatlark (2024-09-30 18:27:10+00:00): I'll try to enable notifications somehow so I don't miss future comments.
Piagno (2024-10-01 12:10:36+00:00): No problem. I guess it isn't the main entrance?
Normally you should get an email for every comment on a note.
Noen (2024-10-10 19:27:48+00:00): Pent tegna!
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2024-10-02 19:15:13+00:00): Halting sites are not tourism=caravan_site
Frans S (2024-10-17 12:09:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
Please square each building with the q key while selected.
Best regards
flohoff (2024-09-30 16:33:55+00:00): Moin,
bist du dir bei der nicht existenz der Bushaltestelle sicher? Wenn da eine IFOPT nummer drauf ist ist es sehr Wahrscheinlich das die existiert.

Flo
Wigharti (2024-10-01 05:02:14+00:00): Moin, ich war vor Ort. Weit und breit keine Bushaltestelle zu sehen.
flohoff (2024-10-01 09:49:28+00:00): Ich tippe drauf das der Lolli nur (temporär?) abgebaut ist - Denn der Halt wird ja erwähnt in Busplänen:

https://download.transdev.de/transdev/uploads/twe/schedule/494/fahrplan-linie-73.pdf

So wie das aussieht hält da auch gerade nichts. Spannende nummer.

Flo
NeisBot (2024-09-30 09:34:38+00:00): Hi Taranga Baral, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 18 highway(s)
- 1 building(s)
- 21 natural(s)
- 2 waterway(s)
- 1 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=157285052
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-04 06:46:43+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/157286748
Nakaner (2025-05-12 12:00:49+00:00): Hallo,

hat die Metzgerei wieder geöffnet oder warum hast du shop=butcher ergänzt?

Viele Grüße

Michael
Nakaner (2025-05-27 21:39:53+00:00): Soeben per Direktnachricht geschrieben:

Hallo,

zahlreiche Mapper haben in den letzten Jahren, zuletzt ich am 12. Mai 2025, Änderungssätze von dir kommentiert und Rückfragen zu deinen Beiträgen gestellt. Jedoch hast du keinen einzige davon beantwortet.

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=1953481

Für jeden dieser Kommentare erhältst du eine Benachrichtigung per E-Mail. Bitte stelle sicher, dass diese E-Mails dich zuverlässig erreichen.

OpenStreetMap ist ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt. Es funktioniert nur miteinander. Bitte reagiere daher zeitnah auf die Kommentare.

Zur Klarstellung: Änderungssatzkommentare beantwortet man im Regelfall auf demselben Wege und nicht per Direktnachricht.

Viele Grüße

Michael
eggie (2024-09-30 08:41:03+00:00): Dag Sebas,

Een tip... Een weg door een gebouw heen tag je als volgt bij de Leonard Bernsteinhof...


tunnel=building_passage

Dus geen layer=-1   want het is gewoon maisveldhoogte

Is de doorgang heel breed dan alleen covered=yes  Het effect is het zelfde.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=157285341

MVG
eggie
Sebas3 (2024-09-30 09:18:32+00:00): Hi Eggie,

Ik heb het aangepast, bedankt.

Groet Sebas
NeisBot (2024-09-30 09:34:37+00:00): Hi Taranga Baral, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 3 highway(s)
- 931 building(s)
- 1 waterway(s)
- 5 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=157285455
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-04 06:47:21+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/157286748
ManuelB701 (2024-09-30 08:42:58+00:00): Given the changeset's size and how most of the changes are in Australia, I assume turning Newtown Station in England (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/778717495) into town node is an accident?
okwithmydecay (2024-09-30 11:16:57+00:00): Yes that was accident, I will revert
okwithmydecay (2024-09-30 11:19:08+00:00): This has been reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157292068
aTarom (2024-09-30 19:02:46+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, es la primera vez que veo el tag
"surface_survey"="Plástico"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1319566663/history
puedes revisarlo? parece un error pero ante la duda, antes de tocar nada, me gusta preguntar primero, disculpa brevedad, saludos y feliz mapeo!
Dondalorian (2024-10-01 03:16:01+00:00): Your comment and revert is unhelpful. The OSM wiki states:

"There is no direct correlation between the road classification and route numbers. The classifications provided below are a guide, but mappers should classify highways based on the actual nature of the road, rather than any formal route designation"

I don't see how this road is primary as it is arterial and does not have pedestrian access. Would 'trunk' be a better assignment for this section?
Dondalorian (2024-10-01 07:27:23+00:00): alternatively if the designation is from whether they are state or federally maintained, should such roads (including these) be updated to remove pedestrian access?
SHB2000 (2024-10-19 05:13:41+00:00): A tad late to the discussion but IMO trunk is also a better classification than motorway (which it's not).
Gill Poole (2024-09-30 08:52:00+00:00): Further evidence - see satellite view from Google Earth.  Footpath runs along left side of side road from Ballatessan Meadow through to Creggan's Avenue.
https://earth.google.com/web/@54.21777149,-4.69505079,30.87821175a,57.35312027d,35y,-0h,0t,0r/data=CgRCAggBSg0I____________ARAA
dankarran (2024-09-30 14:45:29+00:00): Hi Gill. Thanks for adding that in. I've updated it slightly to pull it out closer to where the pavement is, and added a few more pavements in nearby.
Gill Poole (2024-09-30 15:35:38+00:00): Thanks. And another detail that needs correcting - the connection between the end of Corrin’s Way to Ballatessan Meadow is not a PROW. That route goes through private property. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=54.218198%2C-4.694089%3B54.217692%2C-4.693413#map=19/54.217940/-4.693750
dankarran (2024-09-30 20:21:38+00:00): Ah ok, now updated to make it private.
Sandal man (2024-09-30 12:07:19+00:00): Welcome to the osm, but what did you try to map here?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1319567567
Regards Jan
Anne-marie Cunningham (2024-09-30 16:52:25+00:00): private villa
Sandal man (2024-09-30 21:39:17+00:00): But you draw a road?
Jordi MF (2024-09-30 22:01:33+00:00): Thank you, Anne-marie. The problem is that you didn't map very well the reality. I am sorry, but we have to delete an inexistent road that you added.
Regards,
Jordi
Anne-marie Cunningham (2024-10-01 07:08:08+00:00): I drove a road which is an acess road to properties and my property but road un named. I cant seem to put Building/ Villa  on the location where my villa is for some reason?
Sandal man (2024-10-01 12:34:52+00:00): I will draw your house this afternoon, and will use the cadastro website as base.

Regards Jan.
Sandal man (2024-10-01 13:13:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1319872012
Regards Jan
Benoît C MdP (2024-10-15 09:37:07+00:00): Bonjour Arthur

Merci pour ta contribution. Par contre, tu as indiqué qu'il y avait une piste cyclable bidirectionnelle sur le côté gauche de la chaussée, ce qui n'est pas le cas. J'ai corrigé.

Benoît
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-10-02 04:19:49+00:00): motorcycle,_bicycle 
Để ý kỹ format của relation nhé bạn.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-09-30 09:05:38+00:00): 都是根据我自己平常出门的照片进行OCR后填写到这上面的，确保使用的是日本汉字

（因为我实际去过，所以属于ground survey）

如果其他编辑者想看但是并没有时间前往，可以看这个视频
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btIIVtPNb-Y

跳转到 1:20:19 秒开始 （但不能把视频作为参考资料，因为这个版权不一定和OSM相容）
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-09-30 09:06:13+00:00): (残念ながら、私の日本語はまだ非常に長い内容を翻訳することができないため、この段落は機械翻訳された日本語です)

普段外出時に撮った写真をもとにOCRして記入しています。必ず日本語の漢字を使用してください。

（実際に行ってきましたので地盤調査に属します）

他の編集者が見たいけど行く時間がない場合は、このビデオを見ることができます
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btIIVtPNb-Y

1:20:19 秒から開始するようにジャンプします (ただし、この著作権は OSM と互換性があるとは限らないため、ビデオは参考として使用できません)
pitscheplatsch (2024-09-30 10:21:16+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Do you know that all your changes end up in the Live OSM database and thus in all maps? I find some of your changes, e.g. all the deletions of the last chanegsets or the use of the tags here in this changeset, strange or questionable.
jeslop (2024-09-30 14:36:51+00:00): Hello Taranga Baral.

Is there a reason why your edits have a such high number of feature deletions? Also, some of your tagging does not seem to follow the OSM scheme. 
Regards.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-03 07:34:30+00:00): The user has now been blocked.

@jeslop : Should we undo her/his map edits as well? Thank you.
jeslop (2024-10-04 13:25:11+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157461002
jeslop (2024-10-04 15:00:09+00:00): Think that's all right now.

Regards
elsy1 (2024-10-01 19:52:42+00:00): لطفا اقدام به خرابکاری نفرمایید اصلاح شد
Syl (2024-10-01 06:27:17+00:00): Bonjour, je viens de corriger le lien vers Wikimedia Commons, il en manquait une partie.
velomeloman (2024-09-30 10:12:57+00:00): Это не официальное, а вандальное место для костра. Лишняя вредная информация.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157287052
eggie (2024-09-30 09:35:39+00:00): 👍
Dimitar155 (2024-09-30 11:18:12+00:00): Здравей, Може ли малко повече информация за това кръгово? В интернет пространството не намирам нищо за него.
m_zahariev (2024-09-30 11:25:45+00:00): Здрасти, виж в skyscraper - https://www.skyscrapercity.com/posts/190206843/
Dimitar155 (2024-09-30 17:12:32+00:00): Благодаря. В капиталовата програма не фигурира такъв обект. Няма го и в проектите без финансиране. Малко ми е съмнително да направят кръгово точно там, но времето ще покаже.
m_zahariev (2024-10-01 06:15:50+00:00): По регулация там ще има кръгово със сигурност и бул. Александър Малинов ще бъде качен над него на мост за транзитния трафик, виж за справка в isofmap. Ще променя все пак такговете от construction на proposed, докато не се потвърди, че наистина се строи.
Dimitar155 (2024-10-01 08:03:04+00:00): Бях останал с впечатление че ще бъде само кръгово кръстовище, без мост за транзитния трафик и веднага си представих каква лудница щеше да настане :D. Сега видях какво са нарисували в isofmap.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-09-30 09:44:58+00:00): 这是对之前 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157286608 的修正
刚刚我出门去便利店的时候特意注意了一下，发现从两个不同的方向看，桥上写的(外回り)和(内回り)是相反的，对应的丁目也是不同的。

而从两个方向分别看是不同的内容，在OSM中不太好表示，硬要表示也只能是addr:neighbourhood:left/right，因此我觉得还是先删掉更好

我目前可能依然不太理解日本的人行天桥上的文字对应交通领域内的意义，因此如果您看到了比较好的文章能介绍这种现象，欢迎给我推荐，我希望能和您一起更好的在OSM中用不同的tag来表示真实世界
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-09-30 09:45:29+00:00): (因为日语不够好，这是机器翻译的)
(日本語が下手なので機械翻訳です)

これは以前の https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157286608 からの修正です。
さっきコンビニに行ったときによく見てみたら、橋に書かれた「外回り」と「内回り」の文字が二方向から見ると逆で、対応する丁目も違っていました。 。

2つの方向は異なる内容であり、OSMで表現するのは難しいので、強いて表現するならaddr:neighborhood:left/rightとしか表現できないので、先に削除した方が良いと思います。

交通分野の日本の歩道橋にある言葉の意味がまだ理解できていない可能性があるので、この現象を紹介できるより良い記事を見つけた場合は、別のタグを使用してうまく機能することを願っています。現実世界を表す OSM