piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Xvtn (2024-04-03 22:24:39+00:00): Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits. There's nothing wrong with adding businesses, but the way you're doing it is not helpful to anyone. (And likely does not improve SEO ranking.) For now, I've reverted your edit.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149545855
lekman100 (2024-04-22 22:34:45+00:00): In Ukraine names must be in Ukrainian language
DD1GJ (2024-04-23 04:59:52+00:00): Hallo Julian, ich hatte Dich schon am 18.04.2024 wegen eines anderen Changesets direkt angeschrieben und bis jetzt noch keine Antwort erhalten. Hast Du die Rettungspunkte alle auf Standort und Nummer selbst vor Ort kontrolliert? Das KWF veröffentlicht die Rettungspunkte unter CC-BY-ND. Diese Lizenz ist völlig inkompatibel mit den Regeln von OSM.
DD1GJ (2024-04-27 09:36:23+00:00): Revert nach Kontakt mit dem Mapper. Unzulässige Quelle sowie 20% Fehlerquote durch händische Übernahme
Cebderby (2024-04-21 17:45:52+00:00): Wrong at changeset 140063384 (see discussion there) and wrong again.  A reminder that there are no link roads here, is a direct merge of two A roads.
Nathan_A_RF (2024-04-21 17:57:29+00:00): So you don't respond to the comments I made before and just revert with the argument you made last time?
Cebderby (2024-04-21 18:00:31+00:00): You came to the previous discussion with the assertion that 'all slip roads shall be link' and after some discussion you concluded that assertion to be false.   In the absence of ways linking between A roads, no _link is present.
Nathan_A_RF (2024-04-21 18:07:51+00:00): No, you're making things up now.
Cebderby (2024-04-21 18:11:11+00:00): So why is it you think 2 parts of the main route of the A516 (but not others) need to be labelled as _link ways?
Nathan_A_RF (2024-04-21 18:14:21+00:00): Fine, I'll just paste what I wrote last time...

Again, just because these ramps *are* the A516, that doesn't mean they *have* to be highway=trunk. The wiki page for highway=trunk_link even says "Use highway=trunk_link for link roads (sliproads and ramps) leading to and from a highway=trunk." As I have seen many times before, the sign colour could be incorrect. For example, there's a green sign here (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&lat=52.9124875&lng=-1.5158363888889&z=17&pKey=211770674253287&x=0.4926006856509276&y=0.5588215907497979&zoom=0) and yet this section of road is marked as a non-primary route (in OSM, highway=primary). So is it marked wrong, or is the sign wrong? Many signs before 1994 - and indeed newer copies - use an outdated colour coding system, and it looks as though this is the case with the roundabout direction signs on the A516 having left the A38. The signs on the off-ramp should be black and white. There are quite a few multiplexes like this, another example being the A50 and A515 to the west of here. All the A515 ramps to/from the A50 at Ashbourne are marked highway=trunk_link. As you say, the ramps at Mickleover should also be marked as highway=trunk_link, but this is a grey area as there is no defined start/finish point of the ramps after they have left the A38, as the A516 is a dual carriageway here. So I would leave the road tagged as highway=trunk throughout in this case. Same for the M26/M20 junction for instance. Unless there is a specified reason, these should be highway=trunk_link. The wiki says so, convention says so. The ref is irrelevant.
Cebderby (2024-04-21 18:37:13+00:00): I don't understand.  This is where you seem to be claiming all slip roads should be link, but admit that some cannot be.  Hence my suggestion above that after the previous discussion you've seen that not all slip roads can/should be link.  Is this not the case?

To be completely clear, can I just check with you that you've seen that the A516 runs from the Derby inner ring road to the A50 N of Hilton, and the only part that is not the A516 is where the A38 ref takes precedence.  The roundabout outside the Royal Derby Hospital is not the termination and the A516 does not run along the (now tertiary) Uttoxeter Road any more.  The change from OSM primary to OSM trunk at the roundabout is probably because of the newer road design/build standard not because an A38 connection exists; the A516 (OSM) trunk continues to N of Hilton.

In the absence of roads linking between A roads or terminating to/from lower types, I do not see that the trunk_link page description has any relevance.  The wiki description of trunk roads says highway=trunk.  Does this trunk status (which I regard as higher status) not 'win' over OSM's provision of a trunk_link concept to mark roads which connect to/from such ways and generally have no ref or name themselves.

I'm trying the keep the map correct, not to disturb your editting.
Nathan_A_RF (2024-04-21 18:48:28+00:00): highway=trunk and highway=trunk_link have the same status, the latter represents slip roads. And yes, all slip roads should be highway=x_link, it's just that in some special cases, like the southern junction of the A38 and A516 here, there's no definite point where slip road turns into main road, and so the whole slip road is marked as trunk. In this northern junction, there is a definite end point - the roundabout. Hence these should be marked as trunk_link. The ref or route of any road is irrelevant, as per my example of the A515/A50 multiplex.
Cebderby (2024-04-21 19:13:34+00:00): Thanks for the clarification.  Unfortunately - as my comments and changes showed - I don't take this interpretation; seems we'll likely not agree between us and this will probably need others to comment here or somewhere like talk.gb to get a consensus.
Cebderby (2024-04-21 17:51:58+00:00): Wrong, the 2 slips leading to/from the east are the A6, not _link.  (The other two to/from the west are connections between the A6 and the A50 and were correctly marked differently as _link).  Not every slip road is a _link as previously identified to you.
Nathan_A_RF (2024-04-21 17:57:48+00:00): So you don't respond to the comments I made before and just revert with the argument you made last time?
billykerman (2024-04-06 18:06:12+00:00): This was marked as a suspicious edit, however upon further review this looks like a perfectly fine edit to a photography business. Thank you for editing OSM. Have a great day.
PBRipley (2025-09-28 16:28:39+00:00): Hi Dave,

You have incorrectly amended the route of the Derwent Aqueduct around the Langley Mill, Cromford Road area.

You have altered the route as per old OS maps however I had spent many days mapping the actual route of the pipe in person. 

It does not follow this new route.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-05 22:28:41+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11782592985/history has shop = hospitality that was added in this edit
shop=hospitality ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-03 11:26:32+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 149517524, 149518032.
AndresDuhour (2024-06-15 11:59:18+00:00): Buen día!
Observo que ha cambiado nuevamente el tipo place a town. 
Le comento que existe una convención local para asignar esta categoría a las loacalidades con más de 10 mil habitantes, que no es el caso de Iruya. Por eso la modifico nuevamente como place=village.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina/L%C3%ADmites_pol%C3%ADtico-administrativos#Estandarizaci%C3%B3n_de_lugares
Muchas gracias!
Andrés
Waldseemüller (2024-07-16 06:02:41+00:00): Está bien. Gracias por avisarme.
Martin
Langlaeufer (2024-04-03 18:51:48+00:00): Hallo GooTZ,

willkommen bei OSM.
Für die quadratischen Beton-Gehwegplatten bitte auch paving_stones (Pflastersteine) verwenden. Beton steht für eine gegossene Fahrbahn wie z.b. bei Autobahnen.
flohoff (2024-04-05 16:19:39+00:00): Moin,
deine änderungen hier sind falsch. Marienfeld ist postalisch eigenständig - Siehe auch dem Wikipedia artikel.
wambacher (2024-04-06 13:40:25+00:00): Ok, ist was scjief gelaufen :(

danke, dass du schon reverted hast.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-08 10:54:17+00:00): Hello!

Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree".

So for buildings it is not needed to put Home as their name.

Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268616666 is specifically named with such name?

And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
    
Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-08 10:54:28+00:00): 

Also, ideally geometries would be improved a bit! This buildings have a bit different shape.

Also, if building is forming a rectangle in reality: you can select a line and press q to make it more regular.
Argbjorn (2024-04-09 11:34:38+00:00): Hi. What's the reason to made Zhiuli Shartava Street by two separate ways? It's secondary road without physical divider
Leo Slager (2024-04-03 19:47:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-04-03 19:54:57+00:00): Dag Maarten,
Je vraagt om een review:
Je hebt hier de nieuwe weg vastgeplakt op een weg die al eerder op de kaart was gezet. Dat is niet zo de bedoeling.
Alle wegen moeten bestaan uit een enkele lijn.
Ik pas het even aan.
Maartenherlaar (2024-04-03 19:58:55+00:00): 
Hoi Leo,

Bedankt. Ik heb mijn best gedaan om alles zo goed mogelijk te vermelden. Het gaat om een nieuw industrieterrein waar mijn bedrijf is gevestigd (Veilig Opleiden), maar bijna niemand kan het vinden. Ik hoop dat ik alles zo goed mogelijk heb gedaan.
Nogmaals bedankt

Maarten
Leo Slager (2024-04-03 20:02:25+00:00): Verder heb je wegen geclassificeerd als highway=residential.  Dat is echter bedoeld voor straten met woonhuizen in een woonwijk.
Highway=unclassified lijkt mij de juiste tag.
Kijk ook even in de wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway

Verander je het zelf ?
Maartenherlaar (2024-04-03 20:05:06+00:00): Ik ga het proberen.
Leo Slager (2024-04-03 20:39:10+00:00): Veel plezier met verder mappen.
wambacher (2024-07-01 13:36:34+00:00): was ist denn hier schief gelaufen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11782638893
osmMM038 (2024-07-05 05:48:11+00:00): clipboard corruption... corrected
ian727 (2024-09-18 17:25:51+00:00): "Höchstädt und Thierstein zu Gemeinden gemacht"... ...mit der Folge, dass die beiden Namen nun gar nicht mehr auf der Karte auftauchen. Ist das Sinn der Sache?
Margoulinot (2024-04-13 18:05:34+00:00): Hello, was it intentional not to use shop=telecommunication which fits better ?
Leo Slager (2024-04-03 19:37:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
trial (2024-06-22 08:26:42+00:00): Attention de ne pas mettre de faux noms (maison), des noms de personnes (Le Corre), des noms farfelus (accès CAIL 26C)...
trial (2024-06-22 09:38:38+00:00): Sur l'accès :
horse=no
est-ce explicite ? Non
maxspeed=20
est-ce explicite ? Non, on ne doit mettre que ce qui est explicite
MxxCon (2024-04-05 02:00:10+00:00): Hello.
Is it necessary to add lanes:hgv:backward=1 if we already have lanes:backward=1?

Also, this segment is tagged as oneway=yes, yet there's both lanes:backward and lanes:forward tags. Seems like a contradiction, don't you think?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149522202
smikhnouski_lyft (2024-04-05 14:21:26+00:00): Hi MxxCon! 
While making edits I relied on the instruction with :lanes:psv tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes:psv#:~:text=OSM%20way%20points%20in%20direction%20of%20photographer where tag lanes:backward uses in combination with lanes:psv:backward. Added the lanes:hgv:backward=1 in combination with lanes:backward=1 to specify the number of HGV lanes that are present in the backward direction. 
The same is for the oneway=yes tag, it is used in combination with oneway:hgv=no like highlighted in the OSM wiki. 

Best regards, Stepan
mcliquid (2024-04-03 15:13:25+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-03 12:40:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/414425321

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse (2024-04-13 08:24:50+00:00): Hello,
Can you please try and use more descriptive comments that "correct location node"?
Best Regards,
Andy
NieWnen (2024-04-03 19:45:01+00:00): Cześć,
te znaczniki są zbędne. Nie trzeba nic tutaj łączyć/zmieniać.

Po moście mogły się poruszać już rowery. Edytor iD może błędnie sugerować, ze trzeba coś uzupełniać, ale nie trzeba. 

Living street implikuje już bicycle=yes i foot=yes, więc jest to niewskazane, żeby dodawać to dodatkowo, jeśli nie jest to specjalnie wyszczególnione w terenie.

Zachęcam do zapoznania się z tabelą accessów, co jest implikowane zależnie od typu drogi/ścieżki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Poland
mroki (2024-04-04 06:46:02+00:00): Dzięki, cenna informacja !
Filip009 (2024-04-05 20:46:00+00:00): Zdravím, je "Nánosná priehrada" názov priehrady? Pokiaľ nie, tak by to malo byť v popise, nie v jej mene.
Dušan Kreheľ (2024-04-05 21:35:17+00:00): Nemá pomenovanie. Dal som bez pomenovanie. Pridal som poznámku,
Filip009 (2024-04-05 21:42:25+00:00): Okej, vďaka. Je to lepšie. Kolonka popis alebo description tam nie je? :)
Dušan Kreheľ (2024-04-07 07:42:03+00:00): Popis existuje. Obsah som dal do popisu.
Filip009 (2024-04-07 07:50:49+00:00): Len z toho dôvodu, že poznámka je skorej pre iného mappera, ako napríklad "nemazať, v teréne sa to nachádza, ale je to ťažko nájditeľné" alebo podobne. Popis je popis daného objektu.
NieWnen (2024-04-03 19:48:29+00:00): Czy na pewno o to chodziło?

Rowery miały już ustawione `oneway:bicycle=no` Zmieniając `oneway` pozwalasz wszystkim pojazdom poruszać się w obu kierunkach.
mroki (2024-04-04 06:42:52+00:00): Hej!, bo tu wszystko może jeździć w obu kierunkach, nie tylko rowery :-). (autopsja + GSV). Dla tego tu jest nakaz skrętu w prawo na wyjeździe a na wjeździe nie ma jedno kierunkowej: https://www.google.pl/maps/@52.236122,21.0370692,3a,75y,95.45h,80.25t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sYtwcNRrduA4MZDrXMYG54w!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu
ZinaidaZ (2024-04-04 08:41:53+00:00): Добрый день! Вы добавляете теги для пункта выдачи заказов на здание, такое возможно, если здание используется только как ПВЗ. В остальных случаях ПВЗ обозначается точкой внутри здания.
Например, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268644175 - в здании располагаются пвз озона и вайлдберриз, озон обозначен верно - точкой, а теги для вайлдберриз присвоены зданию, что неверно.
Пожалуйста исправьте ошибки, и обозначайте ПВЗ точкой внутри здания
vasony (2024-04-04 05:28:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11782183434

"Új telephelyünk Budaörs, Kinizsi u. 28. szembeni területen nyitva! "

Leszedtem a címet, mert ez nem a kertészet címe, fizikailag egyébént Budapesten van.
Xvtn (2024-04-03 22:30:54+00:00): Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits. There's nothing wrong with adding businesses, but the way you're doing it is not helpful to anyone. (And likely does not improve SEO ranking.) For now, I've reverted your edit.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149545981
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-03 13:10:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Kowalowy":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/963739704
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009304677
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009304678
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009304703

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-03 13:10:41+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/405624473

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-03 13:20:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2606101166
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/405605579

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Leo Slager (2024-04-03 20:07:32+00:00): Het gebouw is kennelijk al gereed.
Dan kan building=construction gewijzigd worden in building=commercial.
En construction=yes kan verwijderd worden.
Doe je dat zelf ?
hanoj (2024-04-08 06:12:53+00:00): Why do you revert my edits? This is RU builded infrastructure 50 km away from UA controled area.

Why is OK you edited UA infrastructure, like this?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146663029
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146699831
Mazda05 (2024-04-08 09:29:04+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
VictorIE (2024-04-04 21:32:19+00:00): Hi

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268649774

Perhaps not a mappable object? :)
Leo Slager (2024-04-03 20:16:23+00:00): oneway=no is een overbodihe tag.
Dan zouden we nog een paar miljoen wegen moeten voorzien van deze tag.
Een way in OSM is standaard in beide richtingen berijdbaar. We taggen dus alleen de uitzonderingen op de standaard regel, met oneway=yes.
karr4s (2026-04-06 08:37:13+00:00): SIRET erroné (31189095800169 au lieu de 31189095800144). C'est corrigé.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-04-07 06:59:18+00:00): Bonjour merci pour votre action de correction. Bonne journée
Leo Slager (2024-04-03 20:26:45+00:00): Dag Maarten,
Het id goed om te weten dat gebouwen en adressen in NL rechtstreeks worden geïmporteerd van uit de BAG van het Kadaster.
Beter om daar dus niets aan te veranderen. Als er iets niet klopt kun je dat melden bij het Kadaster:

Overigens als je de luchtfoto goed bekijkt heb je nu het fundament van de oude loods omlijnd.
De nieuwe loods is aanzienlijk kleiner.
Ik draai dit even terug.
Maartenherlaar (2024-04-03 20:30:02+00:00): Hoi Leo, 

Dit is een nieuwe schuur naast mijn woning. Is goed laat ik het zo bedankt

Maarten
MxxCon (2024-04-05 02:26:56+00:00): Hello.
Please note that refuge islands on crossings are best tagged as footway=traffic_island rather than =sidewalk.
You can read more about this tag at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dtraffic_island 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149524646
zorglubu (2024-04-06 17:04:13+00:00): Bonjour, et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap,

Veillez à ne pas modifier dans un même groupe de modifications des éléments trop éloignés les uns des autres. Un bon critère est de rester dans un même département, voire une ville selon ce que vous modifiez.

Ensuite, vous ne pouvez pas par exemple supprimer un nom de rue en Espagne sans expliquer pourquoi. Sinon cela pourrait être assimilé à du vandalisme.

Merci, et bonne continuation sur OSM :-)
SzymonH (2024-04-05 08:35:01+00:00): Nawet łopaty jeszcze nie wbito, nie mówiąc o przekazaniu terenu budowy...
tekim (2024-04-06 00:45:47+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Thanks for your edit to the map, unfortunately, when editing OpenStreetMap we are not allowed to use Google Maps due to Google's terms of use.
tekim (2024-04-06 00:46:00+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149636937
aTarom (2024-04-04 07:22:07+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, una duda por favor, el
"capital_city"="9"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1480356399/history
¿quizás es un error? para hamlet no lo había visto y por ello la consulta.
Saludos
CartoNex (2024-04-04 13:57:34+00:00): Hola, tenía entendido que podía aplicarse para cualquier nodo que sea admin_center de una relación. ¿No?
CartoNex (2024-04-04 13:58:55+00:00): Error, me refería a "capital", no a "capital_city". Lo he corregido, muchas gracias.
TrickyFoxy (2024-04-14 10:58:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268658428

1=0 what did you mean?
Ahilajohnsy (2024-04-16 10:13:41+00:00): Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have made the correct fix now, level=1 tag is changed. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. 
Thank you,
Ahila Johnsy .
literan (2024-04-03 17:09:46+00:00): давно уже отмечен, не надо ставить дубли
sirorezka (2024-04-03 17:19:00+00:00): Вы правы, удалил. Извините.
silversurfer83 (2024-04-03 15:52:16+00:00): Gude :)
du bist zwar schon eine Weile angemeldet, dies ist jedoch eine deiner ersten Änderugen und deshalb auch noch Herzlich Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap
Danke, dass du hilftst die Karte aktuell zu halten :)

Ich hätte hier einen Hinweis zu Objekten (wie zB Gebäuden) die hier bei OSM gerne vom Luftbild aus erfasst werden:
So lange ein Objekt auf den jeweils aktuellen Luftbildern (und in diesem Fall auch der Liegenschaftskarte) zu sehen ist, ist es keine gute Idee, das Objekt einfach zu löschen. Übermorgen kommt nämlich wieder einer der geschätzten Kollegen vorbei und sieht, dass da ein Gebäude fehlt und zeichnet es wieder ein. Damit wäre also nichts gewonnen.
Um sowas zu verhindern haben wir uns die Lifecycle Prefixes ausgedacht. Die werden, wie der Name sagt, vor den betroffenen Schlüssel gesetzt, in diesem Fall wird aus "building=yes" also "removed:building=yes".
Damit "verschwindet" das Gebäude beim nächsten Update aus den sichtbaren Karten, der Umriss ist jedoch beim Bearbeiten weiterhin sichtbar.
Wenn du dann noch das Feld "note=Gebäude am $Datum abgerissen, bitte nicht neu einzeichnen" dazu tust und in deiner Änderung eine gute Quelle angibst, ist es perfekt ;)

Bei Fragen, immer raus damit

cheers
silversurfer83

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
Filip009 (2024-04-08 20:23:12+00:00): Hello, why you are deleting wikidata and changing wikipedia from Slovak to Hungarian in Slovakia?
DudásAtti (2024-04-09 13:30:38+00:00): Hi. Deleting? I would like to modify (extra hungarian or german if it has) the name not deleting!
Filip009 (2024-04-09 13:38:53+00:00): As you can see in version #8 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/245430397/history you have deleted wikidata and changed Wikipedia to Hungarian one.