piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Matt Bianconi (2025-02-13 23:55:33+00:00): I apologize, no.  I used the City of Mount Vernon interactive map https://www.mountvernonwa.gov/1331/Interactive-Maps and assumed the city limits followed the road's curve. The Skagit County auditor map does show a little bump out at the corner. https://www.skagitcounty.net/Maps/iMap/  I will try to undo that change, or if that is still not quite accurate I will update.
Matt Bianconi (2025-02-14 00:27:00+00:00): Glassman please see Changeset: 162485441 for more extensive fix
neuhausr (2025-02-13 21:29:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for adding to the map! One thing I noticed is that you're sometimes "gluing" areas to adjacent road ways. It's suggested to not do that and leave a gap for a variety of reasons. (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Areas_and_Ways_Sharing_Nodes) Also, it's very helpful if you can somewhat differentiate your changeset descriptions--maybe what road you were editing near or town the edit is in? Just some suggestions from experience. Anyway, happy mapping!
gurglypipe (2025-02-13 18:31:46+00:00): Whoops, that should be Great Musgrave and Little Musgrave in the changeset comments and tags
domiden (2025-02-13 18:46:05+00:00): Should be: “… ("Kassel-Vorderer Westen").”
domiden (2025-02-13 19:24:03+00:00): Sorry, it should be “… ("Kassel-Wehlheiden").”
domiden (2025-02-13 19:23:19+00:00): Should be “… ("Kassel-Wehlheiden").”
s777n (2025-02-13 22:45:49+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162483737
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-14 05:27:45+00:00): Please, do not add clearly invalid data
Taya_S (2025-02-13 19:01:15+00:00): Hello Scout87, 

It seems that you are coming to OSM to map for some sort of game, is this correct? And if so, would you mind telling me the name of the game?

Mapping in OpenStreetMap because you wish to play a game that uses our map is totally fine, but you are expected to follow the same mapping standards as everyone else.

There are some issues with the names you have given these farmlands, as it is unlikely for all these farmlands to have these numbered names in reality. Would you mind removing these?

You can read more about how to get started and good practises on our wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions

Happy mapping,
Taya Snijder on behalf of the Data Working Group
NeisBot (2025-02-13 19:06:38+00:00): Hi marte007, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features!?

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=162477977
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-16 13:50:46+00:00): Is this an attempt to revert your failed data import?
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-16 13:50:55+00:00): Is this an attempt to revert your failed data import?
NeisBot (2025-02-13 19:12:38+00:00): Hi marte007, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features!?

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=162478150
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-16 13:51:05+00:00): Is this an attempt to revert your failed data import?
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-16 13:51:26+00:00): Is this an attempt to revert your failed data import?
wireguy (2025-02-13 20:02:45+00:00): J, thx for staying on top of the notes, adding the building, and for cleaning up the alignment!
jhaluska80 (2025-02-14 01:18:31+00:00): Thanks for noticing.  I check the notes a couple times a day.  Quickly fixing notes is my way of encouraging people to contribute.
Brickblock1 (2025-02-13 20:41:16+00:00): Upsala Lenna Norrtelje Jernväg is an appropriate name. The section was historically split between Upsala - Lenna jernväg and Lenna - norrtelje jernväg. Eventually both being bought up by SRJ.
streckengaenger21 (2025-02-17 17:30:08+00:00): I think you are right - before SRJ took over, these were two different companies (ULJ and LNJ).  I will split up in two different relations, to match this fact.
Brickblock1 (2025-02-17 17:45:15+00:00): Sounds good, thanks for replying!
domiden (2025-02-13 20:06:30+00:00): Should be: “Adjustment …” only.
domiden (2025-02-13 20:07:00+00:00): Should be: “Adjustment …” only.
gscholz (2025-02-15 08:26:44+00:00): Hi Pizza Aylul,
this changeset has created errors regarding displaced and wrongly connected ways:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162479987

I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues. Please watch out what you are doing.
Kind regards
Guido
RedAuburn (2025-02-13 20:27:04+00:00): removed as although it's interesting, it's not the wikidata/url/wikipedia etc of the building. feel free to create a wikidata item for the building, and link it instead
eggie (2025-02-14 09:03:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-18 21:26:23+00:00): All your changesets have all been reverted because of fake roads, incorrect tag changes from waterway to highway,  dragged nodes etc.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162480541
Elizen (2025-02-14 09:12:10+00:00): Hello.
Why do you remove tag name:en? Earlier you added another value of name:en and now you decide to delete tag after your changeset was reverted?
RWD (2025-02-14 10:20:04+00:00): Hello @Elizen,
Nice to see you again. As @mavl clearly explained name:en values should be properly sourced. I'm removing unsourced ones as stated in changes description.
Elizen (2025-02-14 13:19:48+00:00): But it's impossible to say for sure where the information was taken from for the first value of the tag.
And in you comment for changeset you don't mention the resource.
I think it's a rash decision to delete it.
Syl (2025-02-14 16:13:44+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour ces ajouts. Juste une remarque pour les numéros de téléphone : dans OSM on les met au format international avec +33 et sans le 0 au début.
roubaf (2025-02-14 17:29:08+00:00): Ok, merci, j'ai fait https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162511767 est-ce que ça va ?
Syl (2025-02-14 17:32:58+00:00): Parfait, merci !
Tomasz Buchholz (2025-02-14 08:22:46+00:00): Według źródła ta zmiana ma wejść dopiero o 2025-02-14T22:00:00
MCC_ZET (2025-02-14 21:50:01+00:00): Jechalem tedy dzis o 22:04. Ruch zostal przelaczony na drugi wiadukt.
kwiatek_123 (2025-02-26 19:37:22+00:00): Cześć,
zapomniałeś zaktualizować relacje autobusowe.

Już to poprawiłem.
aharvey (2025-02-14 04:31:57+00:00): The Curve and Gradient diagram has unclear copyright and per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#New_South_Wales we don't feel comfortable using it directly as a data source.
Alexey Vazhnov (2025-02-16 20:53:21+00:00): Hi, LM_1!

If you was there, could you please create an area for the hotel territory and move tags from node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8927411925 to the area?
LM_1 (2025-02-17 11:01:39+00:00): Surely I could, but there would be quite some estimation involved. Do you think that still makes sense?
Alexey Vazhnov (2025-02-17 11:11:51+00:00): Yep, in my opinion it is better to have an approximate area — once someone will see that it is not accurate and fix it.

In case of just one node, it is possible that it will stay as a node for years.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-13 21:31:11+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Przylesie":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12586062115
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12586062128
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12586062133

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-13 21:31:13+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12409835118
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12409835119
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12586067009

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SHARCRASH (2025-05-31 17:59:15+00:00): Bonjour,

Je souhaite revenir sur la suppression de la zone landuse=railway le long de l’Av. de la Liberté et de l’Av. de la Gare.

Cette zone est clairement réservée aux trams (panneau bleu), interdite aux véhicules, délimitée par des barrières, il y a des arrêts, et les piétons ne devraient pas s'attarder sur les rails. Donc à mon sens, elle reste pertinente même en milieu urbain. À titre comparatif, la gare est aussi située en zone urbaine.

D'où ma question : en quoi serait-il inapproprié de cartographier une zone ferroviaire en ville si elle est effectivement dédiée à un usage exclusif au tram?

Si cette suppression découle d’une discussion communautaire, je serais heureux d’en prendre connaissance.

Merci d’avance pour ton retour,
SomeoneElse (2025-02-15 00:14:32+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5328674 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5328037 now have gaps in them - I'm guessing that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359703304 should be part of both?
Best Regards,
Andy
b-unicycling (2025-02-15 10:37:12+00:00): I added the missing part to three relations (Aglish, Portnascully and Corluddy).
SomeoneElse (2025-02-15 11:35:36+00:00): Also https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5328674 Clasharoe needs doing too?
The JOSM validator picks this up:
1) Download object https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359703304
2) Zoom out a bit
3) Download data (some relations will appear)
4) Click on all relations shown and "download with members"
5) Click on all relations and manually select them
6) Validate
7) Zoom to problem
8) Read the error text and click on the relation
9) The gap is then shown
b-unicycling (2025-02-16 11:58:38+00:00): Fixed. I usually use iD for that, it's quicker, because it takes so long for JOSM to load. Thanks for pointing it out.
SomeoneElse (2025-02-16 13:49:33+00:00): Thanks
grzegorz75jan (2025-02-14 14:00:45+00:00): W efekcie dyskusji https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162429971

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162504589
ralley (2025-02-14 03:27:22+00:00): What is your source for the name "Bikanervala Indian Sweets, Restaurant & Takeaway"?  Their website certainly makes it seem like the previous name of "Bikanervala" is correct and the new name appears to have been edited to include descriptive elements, which you have been asked not to do multiple times
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162482313
user_22460680 (2025-02-13 22:01:13+00:00): Main entrance*
JassKurn (2025-02-16 20:29:49+00:00): Hi bbqman,

In this edit, and several others, you've dealt with waterways crossing barriers and ways by adding layer=1 to the barrier or way.

I believe this is the wrong way to deal with this, and it's more complicated in Dartmoor.

First off, the layer tag must only be added to the section where the layers are different. You've added them to the entire barrier/way. 

We cant assume (or guess) what the layer values are. There may be a bridge, culvert, ford or "step_over". It's common in Dartmoor for many of its numerous small brooks to flow through small holes in a wall or hedge, or be narrow enough to be walked over. I believe there is currently no way of taggin this in OSM.

I'm guessing this was done to clear up errors raised by a Validator tool. It's important to not strictly follow the suggestions of a Validator. They are often wrong, and don't take into account local mapping practices.

I've deleted the layer=1 from ways where it is a taggin error.

Thanks
Jass
rskedgell (2025-02-14 08:17:59+00:00): When the iD editor raises the "Building crosses Foot Path" or "Building crosses Highway" issues, the first two suggestions are "Tag this as higher" and "Tag this as lower". Unfortunately, these options used in isolation are almost always wrong. Not only do they not fix the problem, but they also hide it from QA tools which would help other users to really fix the problem. This isn't your fault, it's one of the many design flaws in the iD editor where suggested improvements actually degrade the map.

This particular problem can be fixed by realigning the building, using the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels overlay.

In other cases, where there is a driveway or passageway through a building, the highway can be split where it joins the building and tunnel=building_passage added to the section in the building. It rarely needs a layer tag.

I've realigned the terrace on Railway Street in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162493336
Yunkers (2025-02-14 06:52:16+00:00): To są łączniki drogi 94 z autostradą. To nie jest główny ciąg żadnej z nich. Było dobrze.
pavvv (2025-02-14 08:11:45+00:00): Nr drogi nie ma znaczenia.
Od wschodu droga ma 4 pasy, z których 2 przechodzą na estakadę, a 2 w dół na autostradę. Podobnie z wjazdem od autostrady z powrotem na Lotniczą 2 pasy włączają się do istniejących dwóch.
Od strony zachodniej jest tylko jeden pas, ale to nie jest pas wyłączania. Również z autostrady w stronę zachodnią mamy finalnie jeden pas włączający się w Kosmonautów, który nie zanika i nie jest pasem włączania.
Wzdłuż tej drogi są też znaki wskazujące kierunek, co potwierdza, że ta droga nie jest gorsza od estakady.
Tym bardziej jeśli Szczecińska jest primary, to droga po skręcie w prawo też powinna być primary, bo praktycznie niczym się nie różni.
Yunkers (2025-02-14 09:34:37+00:00): Od strony zachodniej jest dość jednoznaczny pas włączania/włączania. W przypadku wyjazdu na zachód jest on po prostu przedłużony poza skrzyżowanie z światłami. W drugą stronę sprawa jest prosta, bo dodatkowy pas pojawia się na skrzyżowaniu.
W drugą stronę nie jest już tak oczywiste, jednak konstrukcyjne to wciąż łącznica, tylko łączy się z drugim węzłem co sprawia wrażenie że jest inaczej. Zauważ że jadąc Kosmonautow->Lotnicza musisz zmienić pas żeby zostać na primary. Widzę jednak że tam były jakieś zmiany w kierunkach (strzałka dla busów na wprost) jednak nie wiem czy to jest stałe.
pavvv (2025-02-14 10:15:47+00:00): To normalne, że przez większość drogi są 2 pasy mimo tego, że dwa potoki ruchu podążają jedną drogą. W momencie przeplatania się droga zwiększa się o kilka pasów, ale to nie są klasyczne pasy włączania/wyłączania dla zwykłych, małych wjazdów na drogę. Podobna sytuacja jest tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9522387431
Yunkers (2025-02-14 10:29:09+00:00): Tamta droga nie jest linkiem nie dlatego że geometrycznie to nie pasuje, tylko dlatego że droga nie może być linkiem "sama do siebie". Innymi słowy nie może być primary_link w głównym ciągu drogi primary. 
Ale tutaj tego problemu nie ma, główny ciąg jednoznacznie przechodzi wiaduktem.
pavvv (2025-02-14 14:10:54+00:00): Uważam, że kategoria, nazwa czy przebieg drogi nie ma nic do tego. Żadnym problemem by nie było zrobić linka od tego węzła do skrzyżowania, jeśli główna trasa teoretycznie przebiegała by w miejsce obecnej drogi lokalnej, tak samo jak w stanie obecnym.
W tym miejscu nie ma linka, bo to główna droga z dedykowanymi pasami. A w Polsce lewych pasów włączania/wyłączania nie ma (niestety).
Yunkers (2025-02-15 10:31:48+00:00): Wycofałem tę zmianę, miała też łapki w dół na discordzie.
pavvv (2025-02-15 10:43:34+00:00): Tylko od Ciebie i Dawida, który nie raczył się wypowiedzieć i prawdopodobnie nie wie, jak sytuacja wygląda w terenie.
Jrachi (2025-02-14 09:18:46+00:00): Ciao.
Ci sono delle strade sovrapposte (probabilmente c'erano già).
In particolare sulla "ciclabile" larga 800 metri!
Se sei della zona magari riesci a migliorare la mappatura

Ivo
michael_ua (2025-02-14 17:50:13+00:00): This changeset was reverted due to vandalism.

hevap04, please follow the street naming conventions https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B8#%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%B2%D1%96%D0%B7%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%83_%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B8_%C2%AB%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%B2%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%96%C2%BB

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162512442
Mohamed_Taha (2025-02-18 09:17:40+00:00): Hi "Waɣzen",
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap!!!
I have noticed you added a "layer" tag with a value  '-1' to some roads:
way 980868926
way 1359720736
way 423850458
way 1359720739
way 513682958
way 966502630
which is incorrect according to OSM rules. Based on the satellite imagery, there are no tunnels in the area.
Could you check it and fix it, please?
Regards
Mohamed_taha
Waɣzen (2025-02-22 10:31:49+00:00): Hello, 
Thank you for you feedback. I have corrected them. Please let me know if there are any other issues. I would love to contribute.
Best regards, 
Waɣzen
Mohamed_Taha (2025-02-23 15:03:41+00:00): Thank you for your prompt response and for making the necessary corrections. I appreciate your attention to detail and your willingness to contribute.
Best regards,
Mohamed_Taha
Michaall99 (2025-02-13 22:30:45+00:00): Źródła: strony internetowe poszczególnych obiektów, BDOT, ortofotomapa, EGIB
rskedgell (2025-02-14 07:25:30+00:00): This edit may have been intended to be a personal note or bookmark, but you altered live OpenStreetMap data. This was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162491696
NeisBot (2025-02-13 23:58:38+00:00): Hi zporras, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 11 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=162483478
zporras (2025-02-14 14:00:17+00:00): These deletions were made to undo accidental uploads by my team member. We normally do not upload our local changes to OSM but instead apply them from within our own application. Thanks.
zporras (2025-02-14 14:01:30+00:00): Additionally, we still have some changesets from user Karenordazl to revert for the same reason and will take care of those beginning today.
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-14 06:12:13+00:00): Hi hevap04, welcome to OSM.

In the past 12 hours, you have made numerous name changes across various changesets. This included modifying Ukrainian names as well as removing other name:*. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.

You can find an overview of the recent changesets at the following link: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid= 162483497
rskedgell (2025-02-14 07:25:12+00:00): This edit may have been intended to be a personal note or bookmark, but you altered live OpenStreetMap data, changing the name of Brighton to "Brighton Alex". This was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162491696
marc__marc (2026-01-26 20:11:20+00:00): associatedStreet ?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-13 23:00:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359715955

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rskedgell (2025-02-14 07:34:29+00:00): If you're going to add residential gardens (and please do), you need to draw just the garden area rather than the entire residential block. See the gardens around the "Adventure Play Area" bounded by Risley Avenue, Awlfield Road, Tower Gardens Road and Shobden Road as an example.
dayalstrub (2025-02-14 22:56:40+00:00): Thanks for the comment. I also added those other gardens you reference. I mistakenly thought it would be fine to have gardens with houses on top/overlapping, but will be more careful in future.
rskedgell (2025-02-15 14:40:58+00:00): No problem - and thanks for adding more detail to the map in that area.
Dawid2849 (2025-06-22 10:53:48+00:00): Cześć

Niestety część Twojej pracy musiałem skasować, a dokładniej przy parkingu, na którym znajdują się stacje ładowania EV. Obecnie działa tam myjnia. Ze względu na orto takie, jakie jest oraz brak tej myjni na BDOT500, zmapowałem ją najprościej, jak się da.
Papryczka (2025-06-22 11:11:00+00:00): Cześć,
No pewnie, skoro stan faktyczny się zmienił, to trzeba zaktualizować. A to były z tego co widzę głównie miejsca parkingowe, a je się szybko robi z wtyczką do Josma. Dzięki za komentarz.
molensteen (2025-02-13 23:40:45+00:00): dit is een ondergrondse container voor algemeen huishoudelijk restafval. In Amsterdam sorteren ze niet huishoudelijk afval(alleen glas en oud papier). zijn dit de goede tags?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-13 23:50:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/508821490

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mueschel (2025-02-15 14:56:23+00:00): Something went wrong here. Most of these objects don't have valid tags, many are duplicates of existing POIs, all have a foreign 'gpxicon' tag that shouldn't appear in OSM.
Mauricyo Sousa (2025-02-16 10:10:34+00:00): Esse gpxcon dados de um aplicativo de acolhimento de dados que uso, fica essas tags gravado
mueschel (2025-02-16 10:27:13+00:00): Please don't dump all your recorded POIs into the OSM database. Edit them one by one, and upload only those that you reviewed and where you added the proper tags.
aharvey (2025-02-14 04:05:10+00:00): Possibly these buildings should have ref=A through ref=K?
mrpulley (2026-03-28 04:38:05+00:00): You accidentally changed the names to '100' as well. Fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180528630
BB12345 (2026-03-30 21:17:55+00:00): Thank you.
Glassman (2025-02-14 00:41:57+00:00): Wow - that was quick. It's interesting, I just pulled up the city boundary because of the county website post about the planning group.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162485441
jnighan (2025-03-25 18:05:22+00:00): Hi, please fix the northernmost corner of the Charter Oak Bridge that you moved erroneously. Thanks
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-15 00:28:02+00:00): The construction tags were correct.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction
Himké (2025-02-15 01:04:32+00:00): I concur. Thanks for the guidance.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 04:27:14+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164574290