piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rempshaener (2026-01-02 18:31:03+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Ich habe eine Anmerkung wegen der Quellenangabe „Hydrantenpläne Stadtwerk am See“.
Das Vorgehen kommt einem Import bzw. einem Automated Edit nahe. Nähere Infos siehe  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Import/Guidelines bzw. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct.
Wichtig ist vorrangig, dass die Hydranten einzeln vor Ort auf Existenz, Lage und weitere Detaildaten geprüft werden.
Viele Grüße
FFW Immenstaad (2026-01-02 19:00:56+00:00): Guten Tag,
Die Eintragungen wurden anhand der uns von den Stadtwerken vorliegenden Hydrantenplänen vorgenommen. Die Eintragungen sind manuell mit vorhandenem Ortswissen und ggfs. genauerer Prüfung mithilfe von Google Maps vorgenommen worden. 
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2026-01-02 19:30:39+00:00): Hallo,
dann muss ich nur warnen: Google Maps ist keine zulässige Quelle für OSM.
Und noch ein Tip: üblich ist mindestens noch fire_hydrant:diameter  und fire_hydrant:position
Viele Grüße
Vinber-Pro (2026-01-06 15:02:56+00:00): salut,

j'ai l'impression que tu as doublonné beaucoup de chose !

si je regarde la déchetterie, il y a 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/567898019, l'historique en V8

et ensuite

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1463657958/history en V2, la V1, tu doublonnes, puis tu ajoutes l'attribut panoramax

j'ai l'impression que c'est vrai pour de nombreux objets de ce changeset

peut-être à annuler ?
Arretche (2026-01-06 16:05:31+00:00): Oui, j'avais récupéré les données dans JOSM et ça a créé plein de doublons. Je vais essayer un revert pour voir sur ce changeset
Arretche (2026-01-06 16:24:12+00:00): J'ai essayé de faire un revert, j'espère que ça a marché. Du coup, je me demande si je n'ai pas merdé ailleurs
DerKaiserschmarren (2026-01-04 15:51:56+00:00): Im Normalfall würde man hier eher access=private verwenden, Personen zugehörig zum Haus dürfen schließlich zufahren ;)

access=no ist da strikter, deshalb verwendet man es in Kernzonen von Naturschutzgebieten oder in Militärberreichen

siehe auch die Wiki dazu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
DerKaiserschmarren (2026-01-04 18:48:25+00:00): Ist nun richtig :)
Rainero (2026-03-29 16:24:40+00:00): Revert changeset/180592372
wegen nicht zulässiger Quelle (Bayernatlas).
Fraxi (2026-01-02 16:28:53+00:00): ЧНГ! Видях, че сте отбелязал tracktype със стойност "sp". Да няма грешка?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176736846
Anonymous36863 (2026-01-03 10:14:56+00:00): ЧНГ! Да, благодаря, че ме уведомихте.
Fraxi (2026-01-03 12:47:54+00:00): Извинявайте, обаче такова тагване сигурно ще е прецедент в OSM. Някой да ме поправи, ако греша. Направих заявка за няколко стадиона в различни европейски държави. И никъде не видях маркировките на футболните игрища да се виждат по такъв начин. Може да се въведат данни за самото игрище(leisure=pitch) като спорт, който се упражнява там, повърхност и т.н. Ако има специализирана карта за стадиони/спорт, използваща данните от OSM, тя може да рендерира такива маркировки. Мисля, че нашата отговорност е просто да въведем "суровите" данни, ако щете.
Нали знаете, че не трябва да се тагва за рендера?
Fraxi (2026-01-03 12:48:30+00:00): И leisure=track е по-скоро за лекоатлетическата писта, да речем. Която заобикаля игрището.
trigpoint (2026-01-02 16:35:05+00:00): Hi
It would be more helpful to map these as turnlanes rather than lanes:forward backward.

Cheers Phil
Sakari_N (2026-01-02 17:20:26+00:00): Moi,

Myös tässä muutoksessa oli raahattu yksi piste nurmikosta kiinni tuomiokirkon kattoon. Korjasin tämän virheen.
rempshaener (2026-01-02 18:54:15+00:00): Hallo,
am Beispiel von https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13426391308:
Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie. 
Viele Grüße
Piskvor (2026-03-13 10:03:26+00:00): Hello. 

Are you certain this was mapped from survey, and not from street level *imagery* (ancient)? For years now, bicycle access has been allowed on this footwalk by the sign C7a Footpath with the supplemental sign E13 Allowed for cyclists. This has remained there since, and last I checked, this Tuesday, it was still there. 

Please verify your assumptions OTG. 

Thank you.
demanuel (2026-03-17 16:54:48+00:00): @piskvor I pass there on my daily commute (direction south to north). I didn't and still don't see any  traffic signal allowing bikes in the sidewalk. Can you please let me know where is such sign?
demanuel (2026-03-17 17:15:47+00:00): @piskvor, you are right. I just checked in google maps. They added the indication somewhere in 2024 near the crossings. I never noticed it before and the imagery on mapy is too old to have them  :-( 

Good catch.
Piskvor (2026-03-18 07:49:06+00:00): Indeed it's not signed very well (and it's not *done* well, either - there's zero foot traffic, but no, we need to have two options, each half-baked) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Strakonick%C3%A1_ulice,_pohled_od_%C4%8Derpac%C3%AD_stanice_na_sever,_18.3.2026.jpg
Leo Slager (2026-01-02 23:21:56+00:00): Dag DwarfNebula,
De route relatie van bus 48 is weer gerepareerd.

Zou je toch willen adviseren om over te stappen naar de editor JOSM.
Dan kun je routerelaties bewerken zonder dat dat tot een foutmelding leidt.

Groet
Leo
DwarfNebula_ (2026-01-05 12:25:01+00:00): Hi Leo,

Excuses, ik ben bij de start van de nieuwe concessie bezig geweest om deze in PTNA te krijgen (https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/NL/UT/NL-UT-BU-Analysis.html, https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/NL/UT/NL-UT-BI-Analysis.html).
Hier kwamen (komen) bij een hoop routes foutmeldingen naar voren, was ik ook hier bezig en kwam ik erachter dat deze relatie de stop positie mistte. Deze heb ik toegevoegd via ID, maar helaas is het hier niet mogelijk om de volgorde aan te passen. Via PTNA ben ik ook bij editor Relatify gekomen (https://relatify.monicz.dev). Hier is het wel mogelijk om ways aan te passen en deze zou ze ook in de goede volgorde moeten zetten. Ik ben deze alleen vergeten na te lopen hiermee.

Helaas kan ik op de laptop waarop ik momenteel werk geen JOSM instaleren, anders had ik dat graag gedaan. Bedankt voor het oplossen van de fout en nogmaals excuus.

Groet, Jasper.
aceman444 (2026-07-10 18:57:51+00:00): Hi, please use proper syntax of the opening_hours tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours . The days of week should have English abbreviations, not Slovak.
NeisBot (2026-01-02 12:28:10+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 29 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1047389260 v5 | 14 crossings
https://osm.org/way/931148379 v3 | 14 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176737786
Sakari_N (2026-01-02 17:15:40+00:00): I fixed the above issue
--
Hei Kotimaailma ja tervetuloa muokkaamaan openstreetmappia. Tässä muutoksessa yksi piste oli raahautunut signumin edustalta tuonne henrikinkadulle, ja se aiheutti hieman sotkua kartalla. Korjasin sen.
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-03 08:02:28+00:00): Thanks @Sakari_N
Sakari_N (2026-01-08 19:23:51+00:00): Hei Kotimaailma,

Huomasin myös että olit poistanut tässä muutoksessa tuosta rakennuksesta building: ja roof: tageja jotka kuvaavat rakennusta tarkemmin. Palautin nämä tiedot. Ethän poista tageja jos et tiedä mitä ne tarkoittavat!
NeisBot (2026-01-02 12:29:33+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/1640244309 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Gynecologist and obstetrician in Vile Parle Mumbai"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-10 07:32:28+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177051323
(Deleted leftovers after several edits)
stosh77 (2026-01-04 11:58:51+00:00): revised.
Mex (2026-01-07 15:27:22+00:00): hi, could you use the square up feature shortcut q, when creating houses please. Happy Mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176738922
martinst (2026-01-02 12:05:12+00:00): Hallo Evros 1969,
ich kenne mich da jetzt nicht speziell aus, aber beim Gebäude Ludwigstraße 42 fehlt eine die building:part=yes-Flächen umschließende building=* Fläche.
Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building:part%3Dyes
Gruß Martin
Evros1969 (2026-01-02 14:28:58+00:00): Hallo Martin das brauchen wir nicht unbedingt umschließen. Man kann ein Gebäude in mehrere building partei teilen. Das Dach in diesem Fall hatte mehrere verschiedene Formen.  https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=47.4934384&lon=11.1118097&zoom=21&camera.phi=-27.589
martinst (2026-01-03 13:04:01+00:00): Danke, schaut gut aus!
Angelo Giuseppe (2026-01-04 17:18:47+00:00): Fonte survey:d'altra Genesi
Deleted
silversurfer83 (2026-01-03 09:52:02+00:00): Hi :)

you make good progress in your mapping.

There's still things you can improve:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6173613005 has been deleted and most of the information contained is now "lost" since you only moved the name to the area. What about the adress and all those extra tags?

Then you deleted the service way a bit east of the kindergarten. Why?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176739169
aceman444 (2026-05-10 18:37:45+00:00): Hi, it is nice that you use MapComplete, but always write your source. Also please add a pub with all information at once, not in 10 separate changesets.
aceman444 (2026-05-10 18:40:32+00:00): Also the Asheri patisserie seems to already have existed as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3579109037 so adding it again with no additional information isn't very helpful.
MaliMrav (2026-01-04 01:25:51+00:00): Zdravo enotramone,

Samo da proverim, da li je naziv 

  name=Fountain "Birds"

namerno na engleskom ili je greška?

Pozdrav,
MaliMrav
enotramone (2026-01-04 07:19:00+00:00): Zdravo MaliMrav

Mislim je greška. 

Popravio sam ovde https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176807759
MaliMrav (2026-01-04 19:43:49+00:00): Ok, hvala.
marcmarti (2026-01-11 11:14:47+00:00): Why did you revert the changes? Ligne 15 and 18 are still under construction.
AurélienQ (2026-01-11 14:57:23+00:00): I already explained it on your changeset. 

You have to make the difference between the infrastructure and the service of transport. 
Here, the first one is finished, while the second one didn't start yet. That's why the ways are mapped as existing, while there isn't a relation of transport.
osmmapper222 (2026-02-06 21:57:39+00:00): Hallo oz42,

in diesem Changeset hast du der folgenden Feuerwache den Namen Wohngebäude gegeben: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/322080828

Handelt es sich hierbei (noch) um eine Feuerwache? Oder ist es ein reines Wohngebäude?
小智智 (2026-01-16 23:50:41+00:00): Why do you keep removing the platform_edge all around the country? I surveyed these platforms and these platform edges are needed to correctly map the extent the whole length of the train, as part of the platform is fenced and trains do not stop.
NeisBot (2026-01-03 07:40:53+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/1640244309 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Gynecologist and Obstetrician in Vile Parle Mumbai"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-17 16:34:54+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/177051323
Thanks @NeisRevert
Colbertson (2026-01-02 15:26:21+00:00): You can edit more than one road per changeset. No need to constantly upload small edits.
B252697 (2026-01-02 13:14:40+00:00): I have friends and elderly relatives staying in this HDB estate, so I'm aware of this new driveway / pickup point. Would appreciate reviews and edits for the better. Thanks!
kenken234 (2026-01-02 15:25:01+00:00): Tidied up the edit a bit.
1. Added one way tags to drop-off lane
2. Added entrance tags to the nodes connecting pathway
3. Disconnected the road from building and added noexit tags
Also recommend using Singapore OneMap Orthophoto layer when you are mapping features, for roads/paths, just roughly follow the centerline.
B252697 (2026-01-02 15:27:28+00:00): Ok thanks for improving it kenken234!
Dindia (2026-01-20 09:58:17+00:00): Hi!
why did you change this from footway to path? 
It clearly falls into definition of footway
eggie (2026-01-02 16:54:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  De procedure is .. selecteer de adresnode en tag daar op bij. Ook niet nogmaals een winkel op de gehele gebouwomtrek bijtaggen.
Verder zie ik nogal wat schade op de kaart van weggetrokken wegen.Waarschijnlijk ontstaan door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176743108
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-01-02 17:01:33+00:00): Schade hersteld. Info samengevoegd met adresnode 24b

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2026-01-03 07:40:56+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12089199830 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Fahrradladen"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und faktischere Version deines Textes lauten: "Fahrradladen"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-17 16:34:55+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/176773141
yelisey90 (2026-01-02 21:07:07+00:00): reverted - not every crossing of building and footpath is an entrance; it's marked separately, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10803344311

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176761221
yelisey90 (2026-01-02 21:07:19+00:00): reverted - no separate way exists

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176761230
stasiu512 (2026-02-13 12:01:31+00:00): zmiana poprawiona - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178500636
proszę nie twórz takich restrykcji w ten sposób
Rainero (2026-03-29 15:18:55+00:00): Revert changeset/180589399
wegen nicht zulässiger Quelle (Bayernatlas).
JakovBušić (2026-01-08 13:44:21+00:00): Hgv restriction on intersection that was accidentally made was removed in changeset 176985304 "OptimoRoute
giopera (2026-01-02 16:03:33+00:00): Ciao kofiney e benvenuto su OSM, per favore nota che hai aggiunto a un nodo i tag del parcheggio anche se li avevi già messi nell'area.
Nulla di grave ma perfavore correggi e ricorda che i parcheggi vanno sempre inseriti come aree.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-01-02 18:56:40+00:00): Merhaba. Yol sınıflarını neden primary'den secondary'e çevirdiniz? Bu bölgeyi biliyorum. Örneğin değiştirdiğiniz caddeye çok yakındaki "Bahriye Üçok Caddesi" de hemen hemen Gazeteci Yazar Muammer Yaşar Bostancı Caddesi ile aynı işlekliğe sahip. Yol genişlikleri de birbirine yakın. Belki, Bahriye Üçok Caddesi'nin batı istikametindeki tarafında araçlar yola değil de kaldırıma park edildiği için onu daha geniş gibi düşünüyor olabilirsiniz ama orada da araçlar sağdan çok sol şeritten gidiyor. Ki zaten İlahiyat'ın önüne gelindiğinde de kaldırıma park eden pek olmuyor, oradan sonra genişlikler eşitleniyor denilebilir. Bahriye Üçok Caddesi bile şu anda highway=primary ile etiketli. Yolların birbirine bağladığı yerleri düşünürsek bunlar da aynı. Neden yol sınıflarını değiştirdiniz?

Lütfen bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tr:Turkey_roads_tagging

Ayrıca lütfen değişikliklerinize açıklama yazınız. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Luzandro (2026-01-06 09:08:26+00:00): warum hat die Fläche access=no?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20039750
gnlpfth (2026-01-06 11:23:32+00:00): Weil der Ersteller der Fläche dieses Tag vergeben hat. Ich habe die Fläche lediglich in ein Multipolygon umgewandelt, unabhängig vom Tagging. Hab das Tag aber jetzt selbst entfernt.
Frank Peng (2026-01-06 09:57:36+00:00): The road serving the church is not a dual carriageway. You mapped another road right next to the one you mapped in your previous changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1464365981 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1464365982
Frank Peng (2026-01-07 00:05:26+00:00): *Please disregard my previous comment. I was meant to put the comment in the next changeset.*
Frans S (2026-02-28 11:04:28+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Why do you tag roads in a residential area as service roads?
This is what the OSM highway wiki Indonesia says:

highway 	service 	way 	Access roads in parking lots and around commercial buildings, industrial areas, malls and rest areas. Also for private driveways, usually long 

Best regards
stasiu512 (2026-02-13 11:53:49+00:00): w takich sytuacjach zmieniamy również source:maxspeed=PL:urban na source:maxspeed=PL:zone30
NeisBot (2026-01-03 07:41:00+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13387275101 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Flooring store in Brownsburg"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-17 16:34:56+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177343218
NeisBot (2026-01-03 07:41:01+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/9728465021 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "North Indian restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-17 16:34:56+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177343219
Warin61 (2026-01-04 08:19:30+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to Open Street Map!! Your contributions are very welcome, we have too few contributors in your area. 

One hint .. the outer way of a relation should not have the same tags as the relation. So a relation with the tag natural=wood should not have the other way tagged natural=wood.
limes11 (2026-01-10 17:08:43+00:00): Hallo

musste das revertieren, du hattest leider einen Knoten auf dem Radweg verschoben. Bitte die Anpassung, die hier vorgenommen nochmal neu durchführen. 

Schönen Grüße
eggie (2026-01-02 17:09:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Bij Van Beest Motoren BV ontbreekt de shop=motorcycle..  tag.
Bestaat dat bedrijf nog?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
amosharper (2026-01-02 15:32:23+00:00): Hey - I'm not sure these are permissible sources for information? Especially the Ordnance Survey MasterMap. Please consult https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright_information_for_UK_mappers

I also note that this seems to have missed way/1085057069 (where Park Lane joins the A21) and way/98371276 (where it joins the B2089 westward).
amosharper (2026-01-02 15:35:32+00:00): Quick note: the street signs on Bing Streetside (which is permissible) at both ends of Park Lane do indeed indicate that it's also part of the B2089 as you've suggested.
amosharper (2026-01-02 15:42:22+00:00): Apologies for the multiple comments. OS OpenMap Local, which should be accurate and up-to-date, has this branch as the B2090. I can also see that local authorities do refer to this branch as the B2090 in notices about roadworks. We can't use the latter as an information source, but I think it casts enough doubt that I'm going to revert this change until we have a convincing permissible source of information.
Jon East Sussex (2026-01-02 16:00:23+00:00): Hi 
Thank you for the quick response - Park Lane USRN 32500330 is linked to the NSG type 3 USRN 81300031 (road number (road Number) B2089 for the whole extent between jct A21 and Vinehall Road
This is evidenced in the East Sussex County Council gazetteer which is available via find my street, a direct copy of the NSG https://www.findmystreet.co.uk/map?usrn=32500330

Regards
Jon (ex NSG custodian for ESCC)
Jon East Sussex (2026-01-02 16:22:56+00:00): The convincing source of evidence is the NSG 'the single source of truth' as well as road signs at both the northbound and southbound junctions showing as the B2089. The road used to be labelled incorrectly as the B2090 until a few years ago when a joint audit of road numbers was conducted by Geoplace, OS 7 local authorities. Where discrepancies were found they were amended with legal documentary evidence.
https://www.google.com/maps/@50.9547848,0.5058827,3a,63.6y,239.59h,83t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s1tX27nM27IN_AyFeFwFmxg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D6.996769179456265%26panoid%3D1tX27nM27IN_AyFeFwFmxg%26yaw%3D239.58559968491633!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MTIwOS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D

Please feel free to contact me at networkmanagement@eastsussexhighways.com  

Many thanks
Jon
amosharper (2026-01-02 16:25:06+00:00): Thanks Jon. I think this still leaves us with a problem for permissible information with which to make a change in terms of intellectual property - something I've myself been corrected on in the past with respect to council planning docs.

I don't know enough here to advise, so you might need to take to the forums. There's a broad FAQ answer that's relevant, though: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data?
Kamil Kalata (2026-01-02 14:57:12+00:00): Ortofotomapy czasowe użyte w tym zestawie zmian składały się ze zdjęć wykonanych w dniach 13 września 2023 roku oraz 21 czerwca 2024 roku.
Langlaeufer (2026-01-02 16:21:19+00:00): Soll "Wanderanbindung" wirklich ein Name sein?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176747405