piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
map per (2024-05-26 07:37:40+00:00): The problem here is that areas for reforestation are not plant_nursery. A plant_nursery is e.g. this place (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53255863) where plants are grown and then relocated to different places in the city.

But the areas here are just places with smaller trees and there is probably no intention to sell and relocate the trees in a few years. 

So a reforestation area is just something different than a plant_nursery.
Bratananio (2024-05-27 08:43:26+00:00): It depends on the point of view. Perhaps it is better to use bushland/reforestation or wood/reforestation.
ratrun (2024-05-26 05:58:41+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!

Please note that these new cycle ways need to be connected to the existing road network and shall not overlap. Your edits are of  pretty low quality. Could you please improve that?

thank you ratrun
Lucarion (2024-05-23 18:00:31+00:00): Tack för snabb lagning!
archie (2024-05-23 19:28:54+00:00): För all del. Jag funderar på att dela upp skogs-mp:et. Det är alldeles för stort så nära bostadsområden. Ett litet fel medför effekt på alldeles för  stort område. Vet bara ännu inte längs vilken "gräns" delningen bör ske. Kanske skogsområde med båda naturreservat i mitten (med natural=wood) och vanliga skogs-mp (landuse=forest) på vardera sidan. Det får mogna fram en tid.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-24 07:18:03+00:00): Please use multipolygons. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151735069
Frans S (2024-06-05 14:25:27+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared,
Connected nodes of buildings to highways or other buildings.
Mapped yards instead of buildings. (check for shadows which proofs it is above groundlevel)

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151735243
emersonveenstra (2024-05-24 10:54:33+00:00): Hi there,

Is the entire section of the street actually closed (i.e. impassable)?
RedGreenBlue09 (2024-05-23 17:52:26+00:00): Source: https://sokhdt.baria-vungtau.gov.vn/article?item=0480ecddf188ef4e75d716ec23429e59
eggie (2024-05-23 18:28:48+00:00): Top! Kwam het toch nog goed. :)
Groet
eggie
RedGreenBlue09 (2024-05-23 18:32:15+00:00): Source: https://sokhdt.baria-vungtau.gov.vn/article?item=0480ecddf188ef4e75d716ec23429e59
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:36:10+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151737954
miluethi (2024-05-24 01:39:24+00:00): Francisco,

I see that you are new to OSM. I corrected all your buildings in Nicaragua for the following reasons:
1) all building shapes need at least a tag "building=yes"
2) I removed the tag "name=possibly a building"
3) buildings should be squared out in 99%. Select a building shape and press the "Q" key.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
grzegorz75jan (2024-05-24 09:53:54+00:00): Witam i dzięki za malunki.
I tak źle i tak nie dobrze : ) 
Już sam nie wiem kiedy i jak jest prawidłowo. Podrzucam parę zdjęć wykonanych chwilę temu z przypadku https://1drv.ms/f/s!AhGMc3MQZJqr8CNZn0cJ9_udosr1?e=g9Yu1z
Zdjęcia mają niby gps ale błędny.

Zdjęcie IMG20240228134617 to widok z wschodu na zachód.

Obszar na pewno do dalszej edycji tylko muszę się tam wybrać i z robić w końcu lepsze zdjęcia.
Teraz dałbym tam 
highway=cycleway
foot=yes 
czy nie wiem w końcu jaką wariację np. designated

Obok są jeszcze jakieś szlaki ale jest sieka pomiędzy tym co pokazuje mapa Pttk a to co jest na nowych znakach i co jeszcze wisi na drzewach. Jedyne pewne to te z nowych znaków. Samo Velo a najbardziej Velo 11 tak naprawdę jest zapętlone pod mostem jak i po obydwu stronach na moście. Gdy robiłem te zdjęcia to oczopląsu dostałem. Paru zdjęć brakło więc trzeba tam dyndać jeszcze raz by to spróbować zrozumieć.
Filip009 (2024-05-24 19:21:32+00:00): Ešte vás poprosím staré nemazať, ale len posúvať. Zachová sa tak história objektu v ktorej môže byť je meno, alebo nejaké iné detaily. V programe JOSM, ktorý vám odporúčam začať používať sa dá nakresliť čiara nová a do starej jednoducho preniesť históriu. V iDeditore, ktorý používate je potrebné starú čiaru popresúvať. Takže prosím nemazať veci, ktoré už v mape sú.
ydrgbjo (2024-08-22 13:38:55+00:00): Hallo orycteropus1

Was ist deine Motivation, dass du Adressen von den Eingängen entfernst und das Gebäude mit der Adresse tagst? Vor ein paar Jahren waren wir uns auf der Mailing Liste einig, das in Bern Adressen auf die Eingänge gehören. Kannst du bitte deine Änderungen rückgängig machen? 

Viele Grüsse ydrgbjo
orycteropus1 (2024-08-22 15:06:26+00:00): Hallo ydrgbjo

Soweit ich weiss (bzw. mich erinnere), habe ich am Heckenweg nur building:levels eingetragen... 
Wenn ich die Chronik richtig interpretiere, wurde in Änderungssatz 105915075 von chatelao die Adressen verschoben!?
Mir ist übrigens diese Absprache (auch) unbekannt, wo ist dies festgehalten bzw. wo kann ich das nachlesen?

Grüsse
Christian
ydrgbjo (2024-08-22 21:51:04+00:00): Ja, damals war es chatelao, richtig, entschuldige bitte die Verdächtigung.

Den E-Mail Thread von ~2021 habe ich nicht mehr gefunden und deshalb im Forum nachgefragt -> https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/hausadressen-in-der-stadt-bern-alle-paar-jahre-wieder/117789/1

Nochmals sorry und weiterhin happy mapping, Andreas
orycteropus1 (2024-08-23 07:21:38+00:00): Kein Problem! 
Danke für die Nachfrage betr. Adressen, Habi hat die Diskussion inzwischen verlinkt!

Grüsse + schöne Tag
Christian
NeisBot (2024-05-23 18:55:03+00:00): Hi johnmalone, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1286078538

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-23 19:05:08+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151739377
eggie (2024-05-23 20:45:38+00:00): This looks like vandalisme
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151739118
eggie (2024-05-23 20:48:57+00:00): reverted due to vandalism
eggie (2024-05-23 21:42:42+00:00): J'ai envoyé un avertissement au mappeur
Jrachi (2024-06-02 18:53:54+00:00): Ciao.
Mi spieghi perché hai cancellato il trail_visibility=bad mentre nel commento hai scritto "rilevamento gps"?
Jrachi (2024-06-02 18:55:47+00:00): E hai prima cambiato sac_scale=demanding_mountain_hiking
in alpine per poi cancellarlo?

Capisco che sei alle prime mappature ma si tratta di modifiche che mi lasciano perplesso.
Jrachi (2024-06-02 18:56:56+00:00): Ancora: hai cancellato l'informazione surface=unpaved
trail_visibility=intermediate
Perchè?
Ti sembrano inappropriate?
Jrachi (2024-06-02 18:58:12+00:00): Rivotti, Pera MAlfaita e Case Giordano non sono abitate in modo permanente e quindi non possono essere hamlet!
Jrachi (2024-06-02 19:00:21+00:00): Ultima osservazione.
informal=yes serve per indicare un percorso non ufficialmente tale ma usato con frequenza.
Applicarlo su un sentiero di alta montagna mi sembra un errore.
Usa piuttosto i tag trail_visibility e sac_scale
Franz 1996 (2024-06-04 17:59:21+00:00): Ciao, il fatto del trail visibility ho provato a rimuoverlo perché c'eran parecchi itinerari che sulle mappe si vedevano solo a piccoli segmenti, perché erano "sezionati" con trail visibility differenti, allora l'ho tolto per risistemarlo realmente in base a com'è.
Unica abbiam avuto un problema non indifferente a lavoro e mi son dovuto fermare un po di giorni coi lavori.
Sul fatto della pavimentazione l'ho tolta perché eran sbagliate ed è inutile mettere terra, e poi è roccia o mettere roccia ed è prato ecc.
Itinerari anche di alta montagna si possono mettere tranquillamente anche secondo OSM basta segnare poi la visibility  e difficoltà correttamente(che devo ancora sistemare in quella zona).
Come ci sono molti sentieri cai in piemonte da sistemare la visibility perché purtroppo non è più così bella come in passato, ma pian pianino si sistemerà.
Sul fatto dei rivotti e pera malfatta d'estate sono abitate quasi abitualmente e qualcuno lo trovi anche d'inverno come anche gli alboni.(abitando li vicino anche d'inverno sono da quelle parti spesso)
Poi adesso vado a vedere l'etichetta che gli ho messo alle case e frazioni perché non mi ricordo tutto, col fatto che col lavoro faccio altre aree d'Italia e parchi.
Hungerburg (2025-11-25 20:47:28+00:00): Hallo Jeka, hier tappt man im Dunklen, was von dir dort erfasst worden ist - https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5060627
maraf24 (2025-11-26 22:57:05+00:00): Należało podzielic ulicę na 3 części i jednokierunkowośc dac tylko na środkowej.
nsdhkstb (2024-05-23 19:29:22+00:00): Ausweislich der Ansicht im Bearbeithngsmodus sieht es nun so aus, als könne man nicht direkt von der Niebuhrstraẞe in die Lennéstraße fahren, sondern müßte erst noch auf die Johannes-Henry-Straße einbiegen. Das ist nicht der Fall. Der gesamte Kreuzungsbereich stellt sich wie ein asphaltierter Platz dar.
hsc666 (2024-05-24 08:55:58+00:00): Tatsächlich ist es schwierig, für diese Kreuzung eine perfekte Abbildung zu finden, da in OSM Wege abstrahiert werden und hier eine sehr flächige Ausdehnung des Straßenbereichs vorliegt. Straßen"flächen" spielen für das Routing nicht die Hauptrolle. Ich habe versucht, die Wege entsprechend ihres typischen Fahrwegverlaufs zu modellieren, auch unter Berücksichtigung der Abbiegewinkel. Aber falls Du eine bessere Idee hast, nur zu! Falls Dich nur der Name des kurzen Verbindungsstückes stört, könnte man den auch entfernen, aber rein geometrisch finde ich keine schönere Lösung.
nsdhkstb (2024-05-24 09:09:29+00:00): Danke für die Erläuterung. Den ursprünglichen Hinweis habe ich erstellt, weil mir nicht klar war, wie man diese Kreuzung realitätsgetreu darstellen könnte. Wenn das deiner Meinung nach die beste Variante ist, bin ich zufrieden.
eggie (2024-05-23 19:54:27+00:00): Dag sk  
Je hebt de straatnamen hier veranderd. OP de kaart van het Kadaster BGT heten de straten anders. Je zou een opmerking op de kaart kunnen maken.
Weet jezeker dat de naam Burgermeester dalstraat (kleine letter) goed gespeld is? 
Weet je zeker dat nummer 9 geen adres heeft?
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=kerkpad+horn&objectId=1640010000010181&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=194209.9255&geometry.y=357687.055&zoomlevel=15

Zou je ook een terugmelding kunnen doen naar het Kadaster?
Merkwaardig dat het Kadaster niet is bijgewerkt.
Wat is je bron in deze?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-23 19:55:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-05-23 20:00:48+00:00): Je kunt op Verbeter de kaart Kadaster een terugmelding doen
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=194215.42&geometry.y=357735.82&zoomlevel=13.28
eggie (2024-05-23 21:01:53+00:00): reverted by changeset #151743319
g-ang (2024-05-27 05:03:00+00:00): Wie kann ich hier die Hausnummer sichtbar machen?
so wie das bei Hausnummer 10, 11, 12 ist ?
Filip009 (2024-05-24 20:02:37+00:00): Zdravím, myslím, že si chcel skorej pridať website ako image.
michael_turcer (2024-05-25 07:42:38+00:00): chcel som dat logo, ale je to priamo odkaz na main page...
eggie (2024-05-23 19:57:51+00:00): Kerkpad 6a heb je verplaatst naar de parkeerplaats. Klopt dat wel?

Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-05-23 19:59:50+00:00): Adresnode 6a heb ik teruggeplaatst op het gebouw.
eggie (2024-05-23 21:00:23+00:00): reverted by changeset #151743265
Hufkratzer (2024-05-24 20:38:58+00:00): Hi,
I think, for a rodeo arena the tagging leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian would be more appropeiate. Example
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/702162073; the iD editir recognizes this area as "Horseback Riding / Rodeo Arena". In JOSM you can use the preset for "Equestrian Sport" to set these tags. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding
eGrawlix (2024-05-26 19:03:21+00:00): Fair enough. I glanced at the wiki page for sport=equestrian https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dequestrian before I added it but that left me unsure of exactly what to do for a rodeo arena
Hufkratzer (2024-05-26 20:14:46+00:00): Good to know. I added some short descriptions to the wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Asport%3Dequestrian&type=revision&diff=2713325&oldid=2506966
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-24 09:19:36+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151742477
DaveF (2024-05-24 12:57:30+00:00): Hi
The platforms were fine as they were.
You unnecessarily split each platform, when in reality they pass under the roof. 
You've also unnecessarily added duplicating platforms as liner ways. 

Please revert all relevant changesets.

Please add more descriptive changeset comments than "edits".
aixbrick (2024-05-24 06:36:36+00:00): Danke
Yorkcycler (2024-11-30 17:17:36+00:00): (never done any OSM editing)If I understand this correctly, you changed the road type here from unclassified to track. This is incorrect, this is a road used by cars. This now means that routing software for bike rides (cycle.travel) do no longer want to route via this road. Is there a reason why this was changed in this way?
SomeoneElse (2024-12-02 10:12:38+00:00): Hello,
No idea how that happened - my recollection is that it's definitely an actual road!
Best Regards,
Andy
eggie (2024-05-23 20:47:15+00:00): reverted own changesetWijzigingenset #151742874
eggie (2024-05-23 20:47:38+00:00): reverted own changeset
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-23 20:10:44+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Złota":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11929337833
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11929337834
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11929337835
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11929337836
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11929337837
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11929337838
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11929337839
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11929337840
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11929337841

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
karr4s (2025-08-31 20:36:45+00:00): Salut.
C'est pas hyper important mais, lorsqu'un lieu change de nom, il vaut mieux mettre à jour un POI plutôt que de le supprimer et en recréer un nouveau. Comme ça, on peut garder l'historique des changements, ce qui peut donner des informations utiles sur les diverses évolutions. ;)
goaned (2024-06-12 20:23:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160587852

the PLAYGROUND is called "Gebietsbetreuung" (= area maintenance)??? Are you sure about that?
YacoobPL (2024-06-16 13:09:42+00:00): My bad, thanks for noticing and letting me know!
Langlaeufer (2024-05-24 06:13:19+00:00): Hallo Magnus,

sind dort wirklich große schwere Schwerlastbetonplatten auf dem Fußweg? Betonpflaster für den Fußweg fällt unter paving_stones.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface

Grüße
Langläufer
MagnusRode (2024-05-24 08:00:12+00:00): Vielen Dank für deinen Hinweis und den Link zu den Oberflächen, Langläufer!
Tatsächlich handelt es sich um die kleineren Betonplatten, wie sie unter Pflaster dargestellt sind. In Streetcomplete sehen die Bilder anders aus. Ich ändere alle Wege, die ich zuletzt mit Betonplatten definiert hatte um auf Pflaster.
Langlaeufer (2024-05-24 08:49:41+00:00): Ich glaube das Problem in SC ist nur, dass man nicht erkennen kann, wie groß die Platten sind.
canfe (2024-05-24 06:43:55+00:00): Nella descrizione del changeset non va messa la sorgente dei dati, quella è già stata messa insieme alle foto aeree usate, bensì il tipo di cambiamenti fatti. Altrimenti vengon tutti uguali i CS.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151741621
eggie (2024-05-23 20:40:20+00:00): Je hebt een knik in de Wilhelminasingel gemaakt.
Ik heb ernstige twijfels of je wel goed bezig bent.
Graag reactie
eggie
eggie (2024-05-23 20:59:15+00:00): reverted by changeset #151743244
eggie (2024-05-23 20:37:57+00:00): Beste sk  Waarom verplaats je al die adressen?
Waarom is de Maaslandstraat plots de Maasstraat?
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151742103

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-23 20:58:25+00:00): reverted by changeset #151743222
eggie (2024-05-23 21:02:53+00:00): Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits.  
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen.  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group

MVG
eggie
SHARCRASH (2024-05-24 19:34:51+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Please do not delete/replace data in order to express the same feature. I was going to contact someone regarding this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/94798023 which was crossing a wall and noticed I couldn't anymore. Restored it. Also when a feature does not exist anymore, often we tend to life-cycle the data with a prefix like abandoned:key=value or razed:key=value or demolished:key=value to inform other contributors in case they are not aware of the situation and use an outdated source, just like Jakka who is from Belgium contacted you 3 months ago to get the information for the residential road. See what I did here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1285956842

For the separated building of the drink shop at Cactus 72851565, I think the original contributor was right to separate it. Costumers cannot access it from the inside, they need to get out and enter the front main entrance. I restored the building and reshaped the other.

You can get informations and good practices here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org

Enjoy the mapping!
joel56dt (2024-05-25 17:23:23+00:00): Hi MassiveDaikon, thanks for these update. Careful with the use of name.
Instead of "name=Office space", I have retagged this as an office.

Thanks,
Joel
L29Ah (2024-05-23 21:58:22+00:00): Fords are about getting across, but not necessarily dry.
Meanwhile, in the summer the river dries out enough you can cross it on foot without getting wet, and i've seen cars crossing it there a year or two ago. Not sure if they do these days.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151742509
gardenBiker (2024-05-26 19:43:15+00:00): Д29Ah, I removed the path but left the ford badge
enemenebene (2024-05-30 13:22:20+00:00): Top! :D Ich war gestern gucken und Du warst schon da. Vielleicht noch eine Frage, weil wir offenbar gleiches verfolgen: Hat das einen Grund, dass Du keine Straßennamen angibst?

Beste Grüße
Henry572 (2024-05-30 19:22:43+00:00): Ja, ich habe mich jetzt durch Holthausen, Wersten und Oberbilk gearbeitet, da gab es auch gute Mapillary-Aufnahmen bzw. heute habe ich testweise auch mal selbst welche gemacht.
Das mit den Namen ist eigentlich eine gute Idee, hatte ich so noch nicht verbreitet gesehen, aber jetzt kann ich es ja vermehrt setzen.

Viele Grüße,
Hendrik
miluethi (2024-05-24 02:00:00+00:00): Grace,
Please square out buildings in OSM. It's easy: select a shape and press the "Q" key.
Thank you.
GraceChang (2024-05-24 11:15:00+00:00): I am squaring out my shapes... I have been squaring out my shapes since Day 1 and have never gotten this comment from anyone else. Do you want to set up a time and call me to show me what I am doing wrong? I can't see based on the way you are giving me the comments.
miluethi (2024-05-24 16:18:01+00:00): Hi Grace, I might have made a mistake, I'm sorry! At the moment we are "flooded" with HotOSM building additions in Nicaragua. 
Many of these HotOSM contributors are new to OSM and they don't square out buildings. Many these additions are far too big, some have really odd shapes like triangles. It looks like some users don't care at all.
I try to help this people to improve the quality. It is not always totally clear which user did which building shapes, except by checking each building individually - which I probably didn't do when I contacted you earlier.
So I'm really sorry for that!
Take care, Michael
GraceChang (2024-05-24 16:26:44+00:00): No worries at all - completely understand. I am pretty careful at mapping and appreciate any feedback you can give me - sometimes, the building images are fuzzy/unclear, but I am mapping the best that I can. Thank you!
miluethi (2024-05-24 17:17:13+00:00): Thank you too!
AntMadeira (2024-05-23 21:31:49+00:00): Hi, rene78.
Hope to find you well.

In this changeset, you created buildings in rows where, in fact, there are many buildings connected. 
I know Nazaré lacks building mapping, but mapping 20 buildings as one is not the most correct way of representing what is on the ground.
Can you please correct this or, better still, map each individual building?

Regards,
António.
rene78 (2024-05-24 12:06:12+00:00): Hi António,

I agree that it is not the best way to map multiple buildings. But it is better than no buildings at all I would say.

The satellite imagery for this part of Portugal is not very high-res at the moment. Once it gets better it makes sense to start a more detailed building mapping in my opinion.

Ate mais
Rene
canfe (2024-05-24 10:20:26+00:00): OSM rules require that the changeset description really be a description not just an “update,” repetitive for any changeset.
Otherwise it is not clear what changes you are making making it difficult to control.
mikimapbuilder (2024-05-24 06:17:04+00:00): Buidling was modified due to large footprint that wasn't visible on the imagery.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-24 09:19:03+00:00): Hi OSMflipper, welcome to OSM.

Your recent changesets should be checked by the local community.

Thanks.
woodpeck (2024-05-23 22:04:22+00:00): Dear itsmohdx, your recent edits have broken a few boundaries. I have repaired the damage but please be more careful in the future. Thank you!
tengwar (2024-06-20 00:28:13+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany za pomocą zestawu 152919218: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152919218 .

Przywrócono omyłkowo usunięty kiosk. Wprawdzie jest nieczynny, ale nadal tam stoi. Więcej informacji w notatce numer 3788502: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3788502
Stefan Nagy (2024-05-26 08:20:06+00:00): There are no woods ("Spengerwald") and there is no lake ("Emsee") between Wiedner Hauptstraße and Jahngasse. Sad but true.

Since this is obvious (oh so funny) vandalism I reverted this changeset.
FrancyskoMarkes (2024-05-23 21:46:35+00:00): Correção: Comentário correto é "Ajuste no limite municipal de 'São Vicente Ferrer' - MA. Dados IBGE"
kikihadwiyanti (2024-05-24 05:42:39+00:00): Thanks for mapping and keep it up #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151744580
Ezra Edwards (2024-05-27 08:16:16+00:00): Thank you, just trying to do my best
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-05-25 19:29:41+00:00): not really sure about these gardens. not everything inside private property is a garden and especially not the land underneath the house.
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:36:52+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151744705