piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
HellMap (2026-06-20 09:52:02+00:00): Ar mācību iestādēm ar tiem avotiem katrai pašvaldībai ir savā mājaslapā savā nodaļā kaut kādā veidā. Parasti tie ir aktuāli, vismaz es neesmu sastapies ar galīgi vecu informāciju. Daudzām skolām ir savas mājas lapas. Ar privātām faktiski tikai pa savām lapām, ja vispār ir. Bet nekas tāds, ko uzlikt kartes slānī vai pa punktiem, cik zinu, nav. Ar tādu iestāžu kartēšanu ir ļoti grūti, jo katra gandrīz pa vienai.
Mister_R2 (2026-06-20 12:26:37+00:00): Labi, paldies par šo informāciju! Turpmāk būšu uzmanīgāks.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-24 16:10:39+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173725479
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-24 16:13:14+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173725598
SamuraiArmada (2025-10-03 18:57:07+00:00): Okay, that sounds like a reasonable justification. Thank you for your input.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-19 09:16:04+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7167745/history has sidewalk:right = both that was added in this edit
so left or right or both?
draconic_mapper (2025-12-19 12:45:58+00:00): Hi Mateusz. Thanks for spotting this mistake. I fixed it.
DD1GJ (2025-10-04 09:42:54+00:00): Hallo Comenald, willkommen bei OSM. Das Projekt entstand u.a. aus deshalb, weil amtliche Karten manchmal völlig veraltet sind und nicht (mehr) mit der Realität übereinstimmen. Es ist nicht das Ziel von OSM, amtliche Kartenwerke ungeprüft 1:1 nachzuzeichnen. Luftbilder sind zwar meistens aktuell, aber je nach Bundesland stellt der Webatlas vor allem in Waldgebieten oft den Zustand aus dem letzten Jahrtausend dar. Er kann ein Indikator für bei OSM noch fehlende Waldwege sein, aber das Qualitätsmerkmerkmal von OSM sind eigene aktuelle Ortskenntnisse. Solche Pfade könnten längst zugewachsen und nicht mehr auffindbar sein.

Kennst Du die aktuelle Situation vor Ort?
Comenald (2025-10-10 15:47:00+00:00): Der kommentierte Pfad ist tatsächlich auch auf dem Luftbild zu sehen. Allgemeiner hatte ich mir zu dem Zeitpunkt folgendes dabei gedacht:
- wahrscheinlich ist mehr richtig als falsch und ich erziele damit in Summe eine Verbesserung
- die Ausreißer können korrigiert werden und das Wiedereinfügen ggf. per Kommentar verhindert werden
- einmal war auf dem Luftbild nichts zu sehen, wo laut Karte etwas hätte zu sehen sein müssen, da habe ich dann nichts eingetragen
- zumindest bei Waldwegen habe ich meistens den Anfang auf dem Luftbild nachgeschaut
joost schouppe (2025-11-04 16:11:50+00:00): You created a duplicate place_of_worship here, I fixed it at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174202021
mweper (2025-10-03 21:59:10+00:00): Hola Juan y gracias por colaborar.
Te comento que observé algunos errores de edición en tus cambios y tuve el atrevimiento de corregirlos un poco. 

p.e. El nodo de la farmacia debe ir por separado al nodo de altura que está pegado a la linea de interpolación, ya que cumple otra función distinta. También agregué algunos edificios y actualicé el etiquetado. Aquí puedes ver mis cambios: 

* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172810519
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172810624

Cualquier consulta que tengas, estoy para guiarte y aprender juntos. Saludos.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-03 21:34:46+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396661586

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WoSoe (2025-10-04 03:47:22+00:00): Hi!

The entire line (all nodes)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51002839
has been moved.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=172803040

Intentionally or accidentally?

Regards
WoSoe
willhaley (2025-10-03 17:52:03+00:00): I'm not sure how best to edit the larger Green Bay Trail related to this segment (I'm new). The suggested bike route is now to continue SE on Cumnor Road to Woodstock Ave, SW on Woodstock Ave to Richmond Rd, and then NW to pick up the Green Bay Trail again
EP_Repair (2025-10-03 17:55:52+00:00): This changeset reverts the addition of a new “America” continent boundary. While the comment noted that “America consists of North America and South America,” this kind of feature is not appropriate for OpenStreetMap:

* A continent is not a `type=boundary`. Boundaries in OSM are for things like administrative areas or protected regions, and they require polygons, not points.  
* Points cannot form a valid boundary relation.  
* It is also inappropriate to tag this as `place=continent` — that tag is reserved for established continent features already agreed upon in OSM.  
* Entire continents are not mapped as polygon boundaries in OSM — this is outside the project’s scope and not verifiable on the ground.

For questions or discussion about how continents or other large geographic concepts should be represented, please contact the Data Working Group at data@openstreetmap.org referencing case #2025100310000204.

— Elliott Plack  
OSMF Data Working Group
user_5359 (2025-10-05 08:01:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/66359716 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
TnWarrior (2025-10-03 20:49:23+00:00): Your behavior on OpenStreetMap is becoming extremely worrying. You repeatedly delete Tamazight names from the main name tag, which constitutes a deliberate erasure of an official and national language recognized by the Algerian Constitution. This is not a contribution; it is ideological vandalism. Despite the blocks, you persist in recreating accounts to continue these actions. This persistence demonstrates an obsessive fixation that goes far beyond a simple linguistic disagreement. I seriously urge you to consult a healthcare professional to gain perspective on this behavior. You are harming the community, the project, and also yourself. Thank you for respecting OpenStreetMap's fundamental principles: neutrality, diversity, and respect for the facts.
TnWarrior (2025-10-03 21:24:04+00:00): @منتصر الجزائري Here is the list of your old blocked accounts
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%87%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%8A%20%D9%82%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%A9%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A8/blocks https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Salim%20the%20Great/blocks https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%86%D8%AA%D8%B5%D8%B1/blocks https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%A6%D8%B1%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AD%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B3%D8%A9%20%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D9%87/blocks
s777n (2025-10-10 12:29:11+00:00): Имя только для собственных имен. Например “Александровский дворец” или “Магнит”. А вот местные названия, номера домов или типы объектов например “Продуктовый” или “Аптека” добавлять не нужно. Подробнее: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия Исправлено
une abeille (2025-10-04 01:40:55+00:00): Hello, those sidewalks are drawn in as separate lines, so the sidewalk=both tag is redundant. You could put sidewalk:both=separate instead!
Francoisepro (2025-10-04 15:26:15+00:00): Oh, thanks for the tip! I'll read up on that tag to make sure I use it when appropriate (and don't when it isn't)
MassCartog (2025-10-03 19:51:44+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. In this changeset you seem to have removed a driveway that is visible in aerial views. Has it been demolished? Does it exist on the ground?
Olson2cm (2025-10-03 20:00:50+00:00): It is an old abandoned driveway that existed prior to the neighborhood creation.  It is blocked off with boulders and not an accessible path into the neighborhood.
Often times I have seen Lyft and Uber maps try to take us into the neighborhood that way which causes confusion.  Removal will prevent that in the future.
MassCartog (2025-10-03 21:38:28+00:00): Okay, thanks for the reply. You seem to have a new account and might not be aware, in OSM we don't remove features that exist on the ground, instead we use the tagging system. 

If that road exists on the ground, even if it's blocked off, it should remain on the map.

Before you removed it, it was not connected to the main road. Routing software would not route anyone through a blank space where a connection does not exist. 

Lyft and Uber maps might have been working off an older data set where that connection was still made. 

I have updated it to show an example of what the feature should look like mapped correctly.

Read more here if you are interested:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

Thanks
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-01 06:08:58+00:00): Hello, please note that we are not allowed to register tolls that do not exist. We can only register the license plate number if it has been segmented and has a license plate.
sgalaxya71silver (2026-07-04 15:55:07+00:00): Hello,
Thank you very much for your time and for pointing this out.

You are absolutely right that in OSM, mapping elements solely based on future-oriented plans is not allowed, and I am fully aware of this rule. However, I would like to emphasize that this edit was made based on an official approved document from the municipality that I have access to. Given that this edit is based on an official document, in my opinion, keeping it on the map to prevent duplicate entries by others seems more reasonable; although due to administrative restrictions, I am unable to share the document.

With these explanations, if you still consider this edit to be against OSM policies, should I remove it?

Thank you again for your attention and guidance.
user_5359 (2025-10-04 12:15:59+00:00): Hello! What is the difference between the keys AWaP:restricted (see https://www.osm.org/way/1195276170) and
AWaP:restriction (see https://www.osm.org/way/33070692)?
wwwouaiebe (2025-10-04 19:34:39+00:00): AWaP:restriction is a mistake.... The correct key is AWaP:restricted.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-04 05:06:06+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18811
TnWarrior (2025-10-04 13:17:51+00:00): +3 accounts created today
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/In%20your%20eyes

https://www.openstreetmap.org/us
er/Double%20Devi

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%8A%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%83%D8%A7%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A9
TnWarrior (2025-10-04 13:19:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Double%20Devi
eggie (2025-10-04 12:48:06+00:00): Hoi,

Je kunt denk ik beter een note toevoegen bv note=sloopvergunning verleend oid.
Nu denkt een mapper dat het wel heel erg lang op construction staat.

Het gebouw ten zuiden ervan heb ik net verwijderd. Zeker weten dat dit gebouw ook wordt gesloopt. 
Je zou een terugmelding kunnen doen naar het Kadaster dat het inmiddels al gesloopt is. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-04 12:48:53+00:00): https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.56311,5.108672,19/?datastrip=20250915_SVNEO-01
Sylabowy Kot (2025-10-03 19:43:00+00:00): Nie zdążyłeś zrobić otoczenia pomnika Chopina na konkurs :D
Yukiro (2025-10-04 06:39:52+00:00): Jaki konkurs? T_T
Sylabowy Kot (2025-10-04 09:21:32+00:00): Konkurs Chopinowski 2025 :P
b-jazz (2025-10-04 15:33:55+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1435170498

When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. If you could go back and clean up where you've made this mistake, that would be helpful. But more importantly, if you could stop from doing this in the future, it would be greatly appreciated. Please read the wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out.
wadenick (2025-10-04 17:25:25+00:00): Thanks, appreciate the guidance. I’m new to this and I think I’m getting better. Do you know if there’s a way I can quickly and easily identify instances where I’ve done this in past changesets?
b-jazz (2025-10-04 17:32:06+00:00): Thanks for getting back to me Wade. I have Q/A scripts that look at all the changes every day and generate a report. This is the first time your name popped up, and I believe they were all right in that area. I can DM you a list of all of the URLs in the past 24 hours that showed problems. Thanks for working to improve. It's greatly appreciated.
wadenick (2025-10-04 17:44:08+00:00): If you wouldn’t mind, that’d be great. I _think_ I inspected and found most, have just sent in several changesets for fixes now, but a double check from you would be most helpful.
coatix (2025-12-18 06:17:32+00:00): Hi. Warum hast du das den entfernt? Ich finde der construction Key war korrekt hier? :)
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-03 21:34:47+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428262543
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428301440

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Endres Pelka (2025-10-03 23:13:48+00:00): Poprawione
NKA (2025-10-04 05:47:27+00:00): Jeg synes du skal stoppe mapping av waterway=flowline i Norge nå. Det er mange i norsk community som ikke ønsker dem her så du risikerer at de bare vil bli slettet. De blir ansett for å være fiktive linjer og bare søppel.
Greg91 (2025-11-03 00:48:04+00:00): You converted a building into a line. I'll revert this change, but please, be more accurate.
ManuelB701 (2025-10-06 17:52:08+00:00): Ist übrigens schon längst eingetragen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7080675686

Den neuen Knoten habe ich, selbstverständlich, gelöscht.
eggie (2025-11-05 13:51:42+00:00): Feedback... Dit lijkt me oke zo.
MVG
eggie
sjwhitak (2025-10-03 20:16:17+00:00): House numbers sourced from E-911 RIGIS.
Supaplex030 (2025-10-03 20:14:16+00:00): Habe mein CS revertiert, da der Übergang zwischen den Straßennamen tatsächlich an der zuvor gemappten Stelle besteht (Straßenschilder an Laterne siehe https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=4136300343292949).
Carto_Ferret (2025-10-03 20:14:48+00:00): Correction: Comment is "Added connections to hospital entrances off of United Nations Avenue."
StarbirdTech (2025-10-03 20:41:44+00:00): * to south acton station
user_5359 (2025-10-04 11:19:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition!
I had to correct your entry. The keys must be entered one per line.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-03 21:04:37+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607457214
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607460371
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429913305
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133100605

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-03 21:14:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607457214
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607460371
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429913305
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133100605

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-03 21:24:34+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607457214
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607460371
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429913305
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133100605

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-03 21:34:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607457214
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607460371
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429913305
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133100605

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-10-04 07:42:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Info samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
silversurfer83 (2025-10-03 22:35:37+00:00): Hi there :)

I fixed the town node you turned into mexican fast food
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172811535

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172809296
dcapillae (2025-10-04 09:35:11+00:00): Buenos días.

Este conjunto de cambios fue revertido: los datos de la línea deben ir en la relación de ruta.

Hay una sección dedicada al Metro de Málaga en el wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Transporte_p%C3%BAblico_en_M%C3%A1laga#Metro.

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
Glassman (2025-10-04 23:21:37+00:00): The business should also have a tag to describe the type of business. Possibly shop=outdoor or shop=sports?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172809674
Glassman (2025-10-04 23:21:58+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172809747
b-jazz (2025-10-09 00:55:30+00:00): Check out this node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13191502812. It overlaps the neighboring fairway by mere millimeters, but is enough to trigger Q/A checks looking for egregious overlaps but finding all overlaps, no matter how small.

If you're interested in continuing golf course mapping long term, you might want to consider looking into using JOSM to do your edits. There are tools in there that make editing much easier. (But the interface takes getting used to.) For example, when I'm sharing the nodes on a border between two objects, I can just get one node on an existing node, and then determine the direction to travel by clicking on a second node, and then just press and hold "F" to make it continue joining all nodes on the existing path. Incredibly helpful.
wadenick (2025-10-09 09:20:00+00:00): Thanks, these are all helpful guidance. I did find JOSM and have tried it for a few changes and uploads. My experience so far is that it's deeply unintuitive so the learning curve is definitely steep. I'll spend more time learning it when I'm back from current business travel in Europe. It's also clear that having some patience to tune and get the features right, put enough points in the polygons to avoid overlaps and have decent curve following, is all valuable. Rushing to the  finish line clearly generates QA issues... sorry 'bout that. I'm learning :)  Meantime I'm just making small edits and corrections where I can as I can in ID.
wadenick (2025-10-09 14:49:05+00:00): OK! Turned out my conference ended a bit earlier than I thought so while resting up in a Barcelona hotel room, I figured out utilsplugin2, it's Split Object tool, and JOSM's own Improve Way Accuracy mode. This was much quicker to correct some ways and paths crossing over that I'd done. And you're right, it is faster. Just... learning curves are a thing. 

If you have a list of QA issues where I've left some early overlaps just send me the list and I'll get them knocked out and fixed.
wadenick (2025-10-09 15:54:41+00:00): And now all that said. Fresh aerial imagery (again, ESRI but I'm not 100% on that yet) shows that they likely reconfigured the south course significantly. Well shit, more work to do when something else can confirm that.
b-jazz (2025-10-10 06:29:42+00:00): Check out the "follow line" feature under Tools. Really handy if you have to re-use points on an existing way.

And since you asked, I spotted this overlap tonight: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13194759713
StC (2025-11-05 10:19:08+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
Gonéo (2025-11-05 10:24:23+00:00): Ah mince ! merci pour ta vigilance. J'ai essentiellement changé les limites de vitesse mais j'ai peut-être découpé ou fusionné quelques segments. Je n'ai pas eu d'alerte remontée par JOSM. Désolé pour la casse.
Yunkers (2025-10-04 09:21:05+00:00): Ja bym tę ex 63 jednak zostawił secondary. To wciąż połączenie między 63 i 64. Czas podróży nią a ekspresówką jest prawie taki sam, więc w praktyce będzie wciąż tak używana.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-10-03 22:05:48+00:00): Na razie bez placów zabaw, czy co to tam jest.
eggie (2025-10-04 07:44:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Jez Nicholson (2026-03-13 08:01:57+00:00): Hi Paul, I'm thinking that addr:substreet=Eastwoods + addr:parentstreet=Ditchling Road would be more applicable here. Otherwise we are sort-of stating that 9 adjoined buildings are all individually named 'Eastwoods'. It could be a terrace, but the road does have a road sign. - Jez
zby-cz (2025-10-04 07:31:51+00:00): I used this script to create the relations: https://gist.github.com/zbycz/f42386e345643718bbf930965dcf5cf1

Then checked it in JOSM
eggie (2025-10-04 07:45:39+00:00): De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.
MVG
eggie
DIrish (2025-10-04 15:57:37+00:00): Hi SilverSurfer,
Thank you so much for fixing my mistaken change to the town of Wexford, PA. I still can't believe that I did that... Many thanks for noticing and fixing this. Friendly greetings from Ireland, DIrish
silversurfer83 (2025-10-04 16:57:56+00:00): Hey :)

no worries. It happens.

Happy mapping from Germany
nevw (2025-10-04 00:30:53+00:00): Hi, for completeness you could also add the gate and the address for number 8 is missing from the map and needs to be placed over that building
fortera_au (2025-10-05 23:12:48+00:00): This should also be highway=service, not highway=unclassified.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172811719
eggie (2025-10-04 06:26:33+00:00): Dag resitive..
Combinaties met access=no en foot=yes kloppen vaak niet.
Waar komt access=no en de rest van die no's vandaan?


Wel bord staat hier vooraan?
Is het een veldweg (track) of een pad (path)

Mvg..
eggie