piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-03 14:55:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 185044755, 185044712, 185044792, 185043031, 185044858, 185044854, 185044726, 185044802, 185044684, 185044693, 185043064, 185044766, 185044834, 185044779, 185043050, 185044776, 185043074, 185043054, 185044732, 185043091, 185044704, 185044746, 185044715, 185043085, 185044894, 185044810, 185044795, 185044765, 185044862, 185043059, 185044750, 185044758, 185043076, 185044812, 185044785, 185043015, 185043039, 185044823, 185044748, 185044738, 185044744, 185044734, 185044845, 185044702, 185044835, 185044888, 185044873, 185044731, 185044879, 185044817, 185044827, 185044789, 185044865, 185044720, 185044843, 185043045, 185044839, 185044849, 185044771, 185044694, 185044768, 185044707, 185043066 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy imports in Ivory Coast
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-03 14:56:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 185044755, 185044712, 185044792, 185043031, 185044858, 185044854, 185044726, 185044802, 185044684, 185044693, 185043064, 185044766, 185044834, 185044779, 185043050, 185044776, 185043074, 185043054, 185044732, 185043091, 185044704, 185044746, 185044715, 185043085, 185044894, 185044810, 185044795, 185044765, 185044862, 185043059, 185044750, 185044758, 185043076, 185044812, 185044785, 185043015, 185043039, 185044823, 185044748, 185044738, 185044744, 185044734, 185044845, 185044702, 185044835, 185044888, 185044873, 185044731, 185044879, 185044817, 185044827, 185044789, 185044865, 185044720, 185044843, 185043045, 185044839, 185044849, 185044771, 185044694, 185044768, 185044707, 185043066 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy imports in Ivory Coast
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-03 14:55:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 185044755, 185044712, 185044792, 185043031, 185044858, 185044854, 185044726, 185044802, 185044684, 185044693, 185043064, 185044766, 185044834, 185044779, 185043050, 185044776, 185043074, 185043054, 185044732, 185043091, 185044704, 185044746, 185044715, 185043085, 185044894, 185044810, 185044795, 185044765, 185044862, 185043059, 185044750, 185044758, 185043076, 185044812, 185044785, 185043015, 185043039, 185044823, 185044748, 185044738, 185044744, 185044734, 185044845, 185044702, 185044835, 185044888, 185044873, 185044731, 185044879, 185044817, 185044827, 185044789, 185044865, 185044720, 185044843, 185043045, 185044839, 185044849, 185044771, 185044694, 185044768, 185044707, 185043066 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy imports in Ivory Coast
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-03 14:55:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 185044755, 185044712, 185044792, 185043031, 185044858, 185044854, 185044726, 185044802, 185044684, 185044693, 185043064, 185044766, 185044834, 185044779, 185043050, 185044776, 185043074, 185043054, 185044732, 185043091, 185044704, 185044746, 185044715, 185043085, 185044894, 185044810, 185044795, 185044765, 185044862, 185043059, 185044750, 185044758, 185043076, 185044812, 185044785, 185043015, 185043039, 185044823, 185044748, 185044738, 185044744, 185044734, 185044845, 185044702, 185044835, 185044888, 185044873, 185044731, 185044879, 185044817, 185044827, 185044789, 185044865, 185044720, 185044843, 185043045, 185044839, 185044849, 185044771, 185044694, 185044768, 185044707, 185043066 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy imports in Ivory Coast
gaerpk (2026-04-30 14:05:20+00:00): Вітаю. 

Будь ласка не позначайте всі грунтовки як track. Наскільки я розумію track це не покриття, а призначення дороги
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=track

наприклад https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1468601151 - це highway=service адже дорога веде на кладовище. 
Поправте мене якщо я помиляюсь.

До речі зі спутників, bing краще не дивитися взагалі бо там дуже стара картинка і багатьох доріг шо по ньому відмічають в житті вже немає. (Зтикався з цим напряму коли прокладував собі маршрути)

Дякую.
greatnameguys2472 (2026-01-19 23:53:29+00:00): 1k edits!!
ilovemapthings (2026-01-19 23:49:26+00:00): Forgot to mention I've also added the creation of a water basin
greatnameguys2472 (2026-01-19 23:53:19+00:00): Lakewood hills
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2026-01-20 01:53:53+00:00): Lanes should not be represented as ways.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177454342
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2026-01-20 02:15:26+00:00): Deceleration lanes are to be mapped as lanes on the main highway as presented in osm.wiki/Lane_assist/Examples/Motorway_exit
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2026-01-20 02:19:29+00:00): I see you were already made aware of these guidelines. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177219986
VLD0251 (2026-01-21 18:15:47+00:00): Hi! the name for node 4811121277 is currently incomplete. according to Wikipedia, the official name is" المتحف البربري بتمزرط" (Berber Museum of Tamezret). could you please update the name tag? 
Thanks!
user_16642036 (2026-01-21 22:34:58+00:00): the location name must not necessarily in the name tag, what is in wikipedia is secondary, more important is what it is on the sign and on the sign of this museum the name tamezret is not found.
SimonPoole (2026-01-21 06:39:19+00:00): Es gibt keine Anzeichen dafür, dass der Inhalt von standseilbahnen.ch offene Daten sind, falls du eine Erlaubnis hast sie zu nutzen dokumentiere das bitte.
welzheimerwald (2026-01-21 10:40:01+00:00): Habe die entsprechenden tags (start_date) wieder gelöscht. Die Gleisgeometrien stammen aus dem Orthophoto (swisstopo/LGL BW). Danke für den Hinweis!
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-21 16:35:48+00:00): This node appears in the middle of the street.  If you're referring to the video detection camera on the signal mast arm, that's not a Flock camera but a video traffic detection camera (which is not recording, just looking for cars, trucks, bicycles and motorcycles waiting for the light to change).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177454663
OSM_RogerWilco (2026-01-20 17:35:14+00:00): In Germany, bulky items such as canoes are not allowed on sidewalks so as not to obstruct other pedestrians. (translated by DeepL)

https://dejure.org/gesetze/StVO/25.html
scarapella (2026-01-20 20:54:59+00:00): That is super interesting. My apologies for the mistake.  I never would have guessed that prohibition exists from my experience in elsewhere. Thank you for teaching me something new and giving me a reminder to check more closely local regulation instead of relying instinct. 

Change has been reverted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177494916
scarapella (2026-01-20 22:46:35+00:00): @OSM_RogerWilco I'd like your opinion then on what I was originally trying to address with this change.  

Currently ways of highway=primary
+ name=Westendorfer Straße  which are part of the route=portage relation
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18625511
do not have any access tags for portage=*. (Whereas the rest of the highway=* do have portage=yes.)

Since by law you must portage on the street would you consider it correct/appropriate to put portage=yes on the highway=primary + name=Westendorfer Straße  even though foot traffic is prohibited on those ways?

Cheers,
scarapella
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-07 08:03:45+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/641795507/history has building = 11 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
KhoraKavat (2026-04-08 01:42:38+00:00): Hi! This is definitely a mistake, I probably wanted to add a house number, but I made a mistake in the input field, I'll fix it. Thank you for writing!
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-08 08:36:13+00:00): And thanks for a fix!
eggie (2026-01-20 08:49:33+00:00): Hoi... Even doorgestuurd naar een van de OV mappers.

https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.22913,5.491211,19/?datastrip=20251225_PNEO-03

Groet,
eggie
Leo Slager (2026-01-20 10:45:15+00:00): De routerelaties zijn gewijzigd.
Busways verwijderd.
RunTrails (2026-01-20 15:07:05+00:00): Thanks, sorry I forgot about the Building part :)
pkoby (2026-01-20 14:27:44+00:00): My bad, I thought that building on satellite was the new one...
dannmer (2026-01-20 14:37:53+00:00): I should have tagged the building as demolished when I added the construction area. I tagged the service roads as demolished so they don't get redrawn. There should be a path built from the back of the construction site to the cemetary as part of the project. I've just added the abandoned section of Glen Road north of the construction site. There's some interesting brick kilns along the road
Flockspotterwenatchee (2026-01-20 02:40:01+00:00): This is a Lowes Flock Camera
dmjab13 (2026-01-20 18:48:56+00:00): please try to keep changes like this to more locally focused changesets
felipeeugenio (2026-01-25 13:10:22+00:00): Hola. Se agrega lo que existe en terreno. No lo que todavía no existe. Solo agregamos calles proyectadas cuando tienen fecha de comienzo de construcción. Es este el caso?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177456259
esgehtmirgut (2026-01-25 18:24:07+00:00): Hola estimado. Creo que se malentendió el término. La calle efectivamente existe pero está ocupada ilegalmente. Hay secciones que sí tienen existencia como una fraccion que aparece como calle Carrera. Voy a modificar esa fraccion como calle Sargento Aldea únicamente ya que efectivamente, por las tomas, es el solo sector en que corre la calle.
esgehtmirgut (2026-01-25 18:24:49+00:00): (La calle existe desde la formación del plano de la población de Pichilemu a fines del siglo XIX, esta toma ha tenido lugar en los últimos 30 años y no ha sido regularizada)
felipeeugenio (2026-01-20 21:07:42+00:00): Hola. Si el camino es público o no no tiene relación que si acaso puede ser mapeado o no. Por favor no borrarlos. Las ediciones serán reversadas.
dpolovinkin (2026-06-06 12:05:45+00:00): this is just very incorrect - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1468630254/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1468630251/history, can you not add stuff like that pls? 

I'm reverting this, geometry here is too incorrect to fix, it's better to remap
ZhannaB (2026-05-28 10:14:59+00:00): Hello, Nirmala03! Thank you for your contributions to OSM. I have a question regarding a footway from your changeset. On the Esri imagery dated 20 Oct 2025, it looks like grassland is visible in that area. Could you please clarify if there is indeed a paved pedestrian path there?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177457857
Nirmala03 (2026-05-29 01:30:04+00:00): Hi ZhannaB ,
Thank you for the update.
I initially created the sidewalk based on Bing Maps, Esri Clarity (Beta), and Mapbox Satellite, which did not show imagery dates. However, since the 2025 Esri World Imagery shows the area is covered by grassland, I have now deleted the sidewalk as suggested.
Thank you for helping keep the map accurate.
Best regards,
Nirmala
ZhannaB (2026-06-02 10:45:13+00:00): Thank you so much for the quick answer and fix.
Sincerely, ZhannaB.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177457857
渤海西岸 (2026-01-20 05:51:24+00:00): 如果乡镇县市区政府和村、居委会的位置远离管辖片区过远就不要放在政府的位置，参考北京市和盘锦市
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-21 16:40:08+00:00): Splitting ways in a manner consistent with how streets get named and a lot more care to the shape of the centerline would be greatly appreciated.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177458347
grawat_Lyft (2026-01-23 03:56:20+00:00): Hello, Baloo Uriza
My name is Gaurav, and I’m a mapper with the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for your feedback. I’ll be more cautious when uploading changesets and will ensure new ways are properly centered and split in a manner consistent with street naming conventions.
 
Thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Regards,
Gaurav
NeisBot (2026-01-20 07:41:25+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13469796255 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Towing service"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 07:29:52+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177792415
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 13:11:38+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184431592

https://osm.org/changeset/184431592
MyOSMaccount (2026-01-24 09:03:46+00:00): Hi Swihail,  
Saw that you corrected something. Can you tell me what so I can learn? You're clearly the more experienced, looking at the amount of contributions. And probably also professionally engaged. I'm just an amature that enjoys order 😄
Swihail (2026-01-28 10:36:54+00:00): Hi MyOSMaccount, 
While working on the relation Stadspark Noord (20107349), I encountered the validation errors “multipolygon outer way shares segment with other ring” and “area-style outer way errors.”
These mostly happen when “outer” members share nodes or segments with “inner” members, resulting in a logical error. 
By realigning relation members and/or removing unnecessary members, I was able to resolve those issues. Thank you for your kind feedback, happy to help further if you want.
Muhmaker (2026-01-20 06:25:02+00:00): Korrigiert wurde Buslinie 641
ftrebien (2026-01-20 13:00:48+00:00): Please do not remove mapped elements with lifecycle prefixes that still exist or are still visible in satellite imagery. These elements should be retained in the data (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix). In this case, this link can be reactivated at any time simply by removing the guardrails, the pavement is practically intact.
rajdhani (2026-01-22 09:52:33+00:00): ftrebien, thank you for giving your time to review my edit and also for reaching out to me. Like my friend and colleague World_Winner, I fully understand the cause of your feedback and the decision of reverting the changeset.  

I will make sure that I’m aware of lifecycle prefixes in my future edits, where appropriate. Your local knowledge and input are highly valuable, and this communication will help ensure better handling of similar cases in my future edits.
ftrebien (2026-01-22 12:12:55+00:00): Thank you. One more thing I forgot to mention: I have also undone the highway classification change because it does not follow Brazil's Highway Classification (osm.wiki/Brazil/Highway_Classification_in_Brazil) rule 2.3.
rajdhani (2026-01-26 11:34:59+00:00): Hi ftrebien,
Thank you for making the corrections and the clarification. Brazil highway classification rules, noted for our future edits.
旧加卷 (2026-01-20 06:35:58+00:00): "name:zh" is necessary, do not remove the tag.
Taya_S (2026-01-20 07:22:57+00:00): Reverted name:zh removal from US

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177461494
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 05:24:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180139944
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177459999
pwbriggs (2026-01-22 18:57:56+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. I have some notes on this edit:

* It looks like you decreased the precision of 126th St Ct E (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225581519/history/5) Why? ESRI imagery licensed for use in OSM suggests that the way it was mapped was correct.

* oneway=no doesn't add any information. Roads are by default assumed to be two-way.

* A minor-road stop sign (highway=stop + stop=minor, you added 2 of these) should be located at the stop line on the minor road(s). Otherwise data consumers don't know which road the stop sign applies to.

* The lanes=* tag specifies the total number of lanes, both directions. lanes=1 could still be correct on 126th St Ct E, but be aware that this implies vehicles cannot pass each other in opposite directions, or would have to do so very slowly (which, again, *is* in fact the case on many residential roads)

* I can't find any documentation for crossing=stop_sign. the crossing=* tag is intended for describing pedestrian crossings. A highway=stop could be mapped here separately if there is a stop sign.

In light of these notes, especially the removed precision on 126th St Ct, I've reverted this changeset. Please don't take offense at that; I know that OpenStreetMap has quite the learning curve. Please reach out with any questions or comments.

Another helpful resource to learn more about OpenStreetMap is the OSM US Slack available at https://slack.openstreetmap.us/. There are lots of us on there happy to discuss questions.

Thanks again for the contribution, and welcome to OSM!
pwbriggs (2026-01-22 19:03:07+00:00): This edit looks good, thanks for the contribution!
Rom1 (2026-01-20 07:49:30+00:00): Bonjour, pourquoi avoir remplacé Mo-Sa 09:00 par Mo-Fr 09:00; Sa 09:00 ? C'était correct et plus simple. Merci.
LudovicG (2026-01-21 12:48:01+00:00): Bonjour,
Je n'ai jamais dit que ce n'était pas correct :) Et quelle est votre définition de "plus simple" ? Je pense qu'il y a un malentendu.
mueschel (2026-01-20 11:37:24+00:00): Please check your edits. It's "building", not "biulding".
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2026-01-20 10:29:34+00:00): Histoire de donner plus de contexte à cette modification : il y a un cédez-le-passage signalé (horizontalement et verticalement) juste avant le passage piéton… immédiatement suivi par un panneau stop.
EfreetSK (2026-01-20 12:31:29+00:00): Dobrý deň, ihrisko tu už je zaznačené, celá tá plocha:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1012602767

Nie je to len chyba? Či je tam nejaké dodatočné ihrisko?
mueschel (2026-01-21 10:48:04+00:00): Please check your edits. It's "building", not "buillding".
Aethonatic (2026-01-28 18:16:07+00:00): Hello, may I ask as to how you got hold of a GPS trace going through Market Street? Access to Market Street is still restricted to authorised personnel based on my survey today.
Fil_Vim (2026-01-30 06:46:29+00:00): Hi Aethonatic, 

TomTom’s GPS traces come from a wide variety of anonymous sources, which might include data from those who are authorised access. Although hard to understand from anonymised data, I undestand that I need to be more critical in similar situations. Thank you for updating the access restrictions based on your local knowledge, I’m much grateful.
knowak (2026-03-08 10:14:53+00:00): czy ta ścieżka istnieje? w środkowym odcinku jest na pewno kompletnie zarośnięta
eggie (2026-01-20 08:12:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   In OSM niet amenity parking gebruiken voor een uitgang.  Ook voor beschrijvingen name= ... gebruiken.
Eenrichting op de driveway is voldoende.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-01-20 08:18:51+00:00): De serviceroad aangegeven met oneway yes.. amenity parking en naam  verwijderd
1Mmarek (2026-02-20 21:21:49+00:00): Naozaj sa tu nachádza nejaká dopravná značka takéhoto typu? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:hazard=school%20zone

Že sa jedná o okolie školy tu už je zaznačené, ako plocha, nie ako bod
markbegbie (2026-01-20 08:00:21+00:00): Comment error.  Actually modifying residential landuse polygon.
NeisBot (2026-01-21 07:25:13+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13469920140 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Self catering cottage"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 07:29:52+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177792416
(No visible changes after review)
EfreetSK (2026-01-20 12:34:20+00:00): Dobrý deň, tu máte asi chybu, priechod je hneď vedľa

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1853547332

A teraz je tam 2x
NeisBot (2026-01-21 07:25:16+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/89805981 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Hotel Haidachhof"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Hotel Haidachhof"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 07:29:53+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177792417
(No visible changes after review)
SomeoneElse (2026-01-20 22:55:18+00:00): Thanks - fixing this restored 1 Anglican parish, 8 townlands, 3 civil parishes, 2 baronies, and 2 counties!
PulisakZ (2026-01-21 08:23:14+00:00): Thanks :)
eggie (2026-01-20 08:32:58+00:00): Opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
schobbish (2026-01-20 15:36:33+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM! In this changeset you modified the Dallas boundary, essentially deleting it, so I reverted that in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177480800. Also, I want to double check a tag you changed on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463900077. Did the building get demolished and you mean to replace its footprint with a generic landuse? Lastly, the unit tag should probably go on your business node, not the entire building, since the building probably has multiple units.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177462965
rhhs (2026-01-20 09:12:03+00:00): Hi, thanks for your edit! Is this a completely new shop, or is it a new occupant in a shop which is already on the map? In that case, which shop is not there any more?
Aleksandar26 (2026-01-20 11:16:58+00:00): Actually I could not find the Review clothes shop there. The bakery was between deluxe and quartz shops.
rhhs (2026-01-20 11:24:12+00:00): In between deluxe and quartz, there are the Review clothes shop, an Easypay office and an Easybox parcel locker... Which ones do you remember are still there?
Aleksandar26 (2026-01-20 11:36:40+00:00): In the begining of the building were - 1 shop which i could see the name (probably Klog), then was the Deluxe shop, then there was the bakery, but between the bakery and the Deluxe shop was entrance for the building where could be the easypay.  After the bakery was shop Quartz.