piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Baloo Uriza (2026-04-29 23:18:39+00:00): Looks like detail-mapped parking was removed in favor of very crudely mapped parking areas that include a lot of not-parking objects, and not all of the detail mapped parking has been removed.

Did you want to remap it like the parking around Crest Foods, or is it OK for me to revert?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182004528
void_aep (2026-04-29 23:33:50+00:00): I wasn't the person who did around crest foods although i'll look into fixing it. Thanks for feedback
rajdhani (2026-04-30 11:07:11+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:182028031
felipeeugenio (2026-04-30 12:06:16+00:00): Estimado. Convirtió pelluco entero en agua. por favor, cuidado con estas ediciones.
saludos
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-30 05:38:15+00:00): Should be reviewed by the local community.

Many tags has been set to private at the following https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1335315068
eggie (2026-04-29 19:13:54+00:00): Tip.. In OSM hoef he geen adressen aan te maken.. Ik heb je info samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnodes.
MVG
eggie
FroschForscher (2026-05-01 08:38:53+00:00): Hallo johnny-park
tracktype=grade1 und surface=compacted passt nicht zusammen, kannst du das noch einmal Prüfen.

FroschForscher
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182004621
johnny-park (2026-05-02 08:43:33+00:00): Ich habe es korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis!
jb54osm (2026-04-30 09:47:09+00:00): Dag multimodaal,
Als er geen toegangsbewijs meer nodig is, is de fee=yes op het omhullende Nature_reserve dan nog OK?
multimodaal (2026-05-13 10:09:28+00:00): Hallo JB, sorry zie je bericht nu pas. Je hebt helemaal gelijk, zie dat je het ondertussen hebt gewijzigd, top en bedankt voor je opmerkzaamheid!
LAZACARTO (2026-04-30 09:24:16+00:00): obrigado
t_ja (2026-04-30 20:19:00+00:00): Ahoj,
prosim nespajaj zastavky s chodnikmi. Aj na OSM wiki je vyslovne uvedene, ze sa maju umiestnovat na pristresok alebo stlpik:
"A bus stop should be defined for each discrete location where a POLE or SHELTER is placed".
Chyby som uz opravil.
Bilykralik16 (2026-05-07 15:23:14+00:00): Ahoj, neplánuju se nějak dohadovat, ale jen pro vysvětlení, protože mě celkem mrzí, že to někdo bere jako vandalismus. Vycházel jsem z toho, že tam, kde leží označník zastávky (typicky právě na chodníku), je jasně vymezená její poloha, což ostatně OSM wiki uvádí jako ten "pole". Navíc na Hurbanově byl ten bod umístěný ani ne na přístřešek, ale na ten stánek s výdejním automatem, který jako přístřešek neslouží. Díky a hezký den. :)
cronoser (2026-06-02 07:48:29+00:00): Hola, un detalle para tengas en cuenta futuras ediciones, ten cuidado cuando borras, debe ser lo último que se hace. En este caso, veo que has borrado el paraje Valdelacueva osm.org/node/1243211758/history/1#map=17/41.781489/-3.054950 Este paraje se importó hace 15 años de los datos del Instituto Geográfico Nacional, por tanto debería ser correcta su puesta en OSM. Lo he contrastado con Iberpix y efectivamente existe https://www.ign.es/iberpix?center=-339527.29501710384,5128177.156559353&zoom=16.62722461828555&srs=EPSG:3857
Hugoren Martinako (2026-07-05 17:38:27+00:00): Es evidente que ha confundido paraje con el arroyo, puesto que le ha puesto el nombre de Valdelacueva al arroyo (el cual es sin nombre), eliminado el paraje como tal
kamilbogacki (2026-05-12 23:32:43+00:00): Nie ma sensu dodawać miejsca modlitw jako cmentarza, skoro jest już oznaczony jako obszar.
DFW-Backyard7 (2026-04-29 20:29:11+00:00): Hello! Please see this site for the list of standard tags that ALPRs need to have to be recognized by apps like deflock https://deflock.org/report/id

I'll fix this one, but specifically it should have at least

man_made=surveillance
surveillance:type=ALPR
surveillance=public
camera:type=fixed

And if known for sure that it's flock (and not say, motorola)

manufacturer=Flock Safety
manufacturer:wikidata=Q108485435
Adikso (2026-04-30 06:41:23+00:00): Proszę o tworzenie zestawów zmian z opisem mówiącym o tym co zostało zmienione.
KingVik (2026-06-10 10:11:31+00:00): Reverted due to poor quality import and not following community guideline
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:02:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-01 03:43:21+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1498416736

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kubahahaha (2026-04-30 09:28:46+00:00): Nie usuwaj całkiem, zamienię zamiast tego na ścieżkę dla pieszych, widzę że i tak niedokładnie była narysowana.

Od Olimpijskiej tam da się dojechać? Bo na zdjęciach lepiej wygląda ta droga
Formyca (2026-04-30 09:44:56+00:00): od Olimpijskiej jest zjazd ale droga jest jest piaskowa, dziurawa i google maps prowadzi nią klientów do mojej firmy Formyca. Klienci narzekaja , że ledwo przejechali. Ta droga nie istenieje w planach miasta, w planach miasta jest to teren pod zajezdnie autobusową. To jest ścieżka wyjeżdzona przez lokalnych mieszkańców. Droga asfaltowa prowadząca do mojej firmy nazywa się Cedrowa.
eggie (2026-04-30 06:23:05+00:00): Dag Johnny. Je vraagt feedback.
Je zult dan ook op het bewuste wegdeel  hgv=no moeten taggen. 
Alleen een verkeersbord heeft geen effect.

MVG
eggie
JohnnyWvD (2026-04-30 10:17:10+00:00): Hoe voeg je dat dan toe aan een weg?
Ik zat dat nl. te zoeken
eggie (2026-04-30 10:23:29+00:00): De weg selecteren.. dan de regel hgv=no toevoegen aan het wegdeel. In iD via regels aanvullen.. het plusje.
Wanneer het stuk te lang is evt weg splitsen.
Succes
eggie (2026-04-30 10:48:31+00:00): Na na 675m  pas.
Zie https://wegkenmerken.ndw.nu/kaart/verkeersborden/2ded7a6e-fb49-44e4-91ad-a5313318983a?maxsnelheidfilter=1f5451a0.________Dw&verkeersbordfilter=47f8f896._____________________________________________98&kaartlagen=SPEED_LIMIT,TRAFFIC_SIGN,BRT&zichtbaar-gebied=6.04536,52.473,6.05438,52.47714
eggie (2026-04-30 10:50:33+00:00): In dit geval dus niet toevoegen aan dat wegdeel. Dat geldt pas voor na de splitsing Enkweg met Oude Kerkweg.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-13 09:53:02+00:00): Separate to a POI node, merge and clean up two sets of SEO spam tags for POI "Bharti Dental Care" on two adjacent buildings in changeset 184048774

https://osm.org/changeset/184048774
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-13 09:42:54+00:00): Reverted a SEO account changing the name of one segment of one carriageway of a divided road with a prohibited source of Google Maps, in changeset 184048363

https://osm.org/changeset/184048363
MappingMore (2026-04-30 15:46:36+00:00): Partially Revert of 181994014
eggie (2026-04-29 20:51:35+00:00): Hi  Een doel is geen pitch ik pas het even aan.
Gr eggie
Marikey (2026-05-02 05:25:08+00:00): Hi, dank voor het aanpassen.
LarsBG (2026-05-12 03:08:29+00:00): Hej er vi sikker på at stien går ind i lade stationen der ? Se nillederne nederst her...
https://via.ritzau.dk/pressemeddelelse/14889263/ewii-fejrer-abning-af-lynladestation-i-kolding?publisherId=13560138&lang=da
Jørn-osm (2026-05-12 07:11:33+00:00): Ja, hvis det er græsstien:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1487118042

Det foto der er i pressemeddelelse er taget før åbning.
Her er et foto fra åbent hus:

https://dk.linkedin.com/posts/ewii_vores-nye-lynladestation-i-kolding-er-nu-activity-7455524674706272258-QKjh


Bemærk min brug af survey og GPS i source, jeg har været der.
LarsBG (2026-05-12 08:32:38+00:00): fint så laver jeg et hul i hegnet.
mavl (2026-06-07 06:02:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183764451, 183764460, 183764431, 183764453, 183764448, 183764459, 183764455 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20768].
mikita_paloika (2026-04-30 14:14:14+00:00): Hello Asher Lewis and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Thanks for your contribution. I noticed you added a Shell gas station (way/1506244202) here, but it isn't visible on the current satellite imagery, which shows a green area/park instead.

Could you please clarify your source for this information? Did you visit this location recently, or is this a planned construction? It would be very helpful to know more so we can keep the map accurate.

Thank you!
Mikita
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182008452
eggie (2026-04-30 05:48:34+00:00): Dag Michael. Je tags zijn niet valide. Waarom key en value?
..motor_vehicle=no hoort niet op een paaltje.
Denk aan moped en mofa.
Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-04-30 06:36:21+00:00): removed value= and key= and motor_vehicle=no
Gr eggie
Bhri (2026-07-05 15:30:44+00:00): 👍
tux67 (2026-04-30 07:07:19+00:00): Zur Info - Telefonnummern werden bei OSM im ITU Format erfasst: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone#Wie_mappen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182009206
Bhri (2026-07-05 15:30:05+00:00): ؟؟
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-07-06 05:48:36+00:00): تم إزالة الاسم الشخصي من الخريطة، ولو فتحنا المجال لكل شخص أن يسمى الفياض والأماكن الطبيعية باسمه الشخصي لأصبحت الخريطة فوضى!
nevw (2026-05-27 07:50:47+00:00): Hi, outer ways of a multipolygon cannot share segments. Simple polygons will fix it.
nevw (2026-05-27 07:56:16+00:00): Chemist Warehouse is the mp
nevw (2026-05-27 22:01:09+00:00): I have removed the invalid mp and changed to one simple polygon.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
OSMthechallenger (2026-04-30 09:11:13+00:00): How can this change be as long as equator if technically only one change was made in one place???
ScarlettB (2026-04-30 09:29:19+00:00): France includes many overseas territories, so when you do a bounding box for France, it's pretty much half of the world.
krassy513 (2026-04-29 22:29:51+00:00): Using OpenStreetMap, a MetroNow! transit rider attempts to address an ongoing travel issue.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
eggie (2026-04-30 06:20:30+00:00): Hoi Telluris,
Volgens mij is het helemaal gelukt.
MVG
eggie
Telluris (2026-05-01 09:48:41+00:00): Hoi eggie,

Bedankt voor het reviewen.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Telluris
catgirlseraid (2026-05-19 22:36:52+00:00): Hi,

Southern Hospitality supplies cooking equipment and should not be tagged as a hospital
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13778137206/history
lee_bei (2026-05-20 01:01:40+00:00): Hi, good spotting. Can you change it to right tag as my phone app has no such cooking equipment 
Cheers
rterr-oomatt (2026-04-29 23:18:54+00:00): Also "Rocket Fizz" at this address no longer exists. The building's first floor is Nick The Greek (298 Castro Street) and second floor is Resemble AI (812 W Dana Street) How should the building outline be labeled?
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
anghenfil (2026-06-10 23:03:30+00:00): Hey, why are there thousands of unconnected nodes here instead of buildings? Did you use AI?
woodpeck (2026-06-10 23:47:18+00:00): A revert of these edits is ongoing but takes a while.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
KingVik (2026-07-24 22:13:12+00:00): Reverted Poor Quality AI Imported data during AfricaMap Cup
JJIglesias (2026-04-30 05:22:40+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
nevw (2026-05-07 08:20:38+00:00): Hi, I have noticed that the WaterwayMap shows these to be in error.
https://waterwaymap.org/loops/#map=12.69/-38.65258/177.31485
I assume it is because you are including the riverbank polygons in the waterway relations and adding role=outer for those.
From the osm wiki they should not be part of the waterway relations
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:waterway
I think the riverbanks (or water bodies that include the banks) get mapped separately as natural=water plus water=river.
I expect the name only goes on the waterway relations and all the waterway=river lines.
If the waterbody on the river is a lake it may carry a separate name.
Prosperosity (2026-05-11 02:01:01+00:00): Shouldn't the water area (especially times when it's defined in the Gazetteer) be a part of the relation as per One feature, one OSM element? I've been adding river areas as these can be helpful when displaying wider rivers in Wikipedia pages (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%AAawa_River - as the river widens the area on the map does too).
nevw (2026-05-11 03:01:29+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:waterway, in the members section, has riverbank or
waterbody crossed through and not to be used in waterway relations.
There is a link to the talk page about this.
I think this is a good topic to raise on the osm community forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/
as I don't recall this being discussed recently and there is a fairly large number of mappers that do a lot of waterway mapping.
KingVik (2026-06-10 10:04:32+00:00): reverted due to poor quality edits
KingVik (2026-06-10 10:08:54+00:00): Reverted due to poor quality import
KingVik (2026-06-11 08:58:06+00:00): Reverted due to poor quality edits or AI Import without validation
KingVik (2026-06-11 09:05:53+00:00): Reverted poor quality edit and AI imported data without following community guideline
KingVik (2026-06-11 08:56:28+00:00): Reverting this because of poor quality edits and do not follow community guideline before importing
FajrAl (2026-04-30 14:05:29+00:00): Great work on these updates. I was hitting some conflicts in this area as well. Do you have a workflow for handling those versioning issues?
LordGarySugar (2026-05-01 15:12:32+00:00): You can get problems if you don't download the whole area covered by a multipolygon (just downloading all members is not enough) in case there are other multipolygons using the same ways as outers. (You could delete a way that is still needed by another MP). Normally the multipoly-gone plugin (https://github.com/watmildon/multipoly-gone) should take care of this by downloading all referrers of the ways used by a specific multipolygon. But there was clearly a problem in this area. When I redid this changeset, I downloaded all multipolygons in the whole region, and didn't get any conflicts.
redwingsfan1975 (2026-05-01 23:32:13+00:00): These are not fake trails! User eerib is ill-informed!
redwingsfan1975 (2026-05-01 23:36:27+00:00): Reverting an ill-informed revert from an over-zealous user

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182096830
eerib (2026-05-02 06:34:55+00:00): Please note that attempting to vandalize OpenStreetmap by adding numerous fictitious trails reflects poorly on the local mountain biking community and may undermine future projects and grants with government bodies.
NaufalFarras (2026-07-25 10:29:59+00:00): Hi, why is this road tagged with motorcar=destination? As far as I know, it can be used by car, but one way at a time.
mapper377 (2026-04-30 02:37:36+00:00): The changeset comment contains an error. Instead of Proctor Street, it should have said Florida Street. Proctor Street (the next street) was not edited in this changeset.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-30 05:35:32+00:00): Hi Harsha514000, welcome to OSM.

You created several duplicate features here.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1506416111
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1506416183

Best regards.
TriangleMaple (2026-04-30 06:12:53+00:00): Hi there, I was wondering if the deletion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9558973289 (Tourism Information POI in Ireland) was intended? I notice all of your previous edits are US-based, and I'm wondering if it was some sort of mistake.
HostileSpark (2026-05-01 03:04:23+00:00): Just noticed this edit that overlapped the area I work on (Calgary, Alberta, Canada). I would consider any edit outside of the west coast (near Portland, Oregon, USA) to be a mistake that should be undone.
mueschel (2026-05-09 15:16:02+00:00): Hi,
please check this node, something went wrong with the name tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13778573755
kurisubrooks (2026-05-25 07:40:28+00:00): Hi Ant,
Thanks for adding this data. 

I have some points of contention regarding the data set, as I frequently survey this suburb. 

I’ve confirmed the designation against the TfNSW source, though on the ground the infrastructure along Endeavour Avenue doesn’t really appear to support cycle path designation.

This footpath (way/1016069162) is less than 1 metre in width, uneven due to tree root uplift, and has no visible shared path signage or line marking. The first shared path signage I could find starts at way/1007914621, near the high school/across the intersection.

The refuge island in the middle of Bennett Road is also extremely narrow (roughly 80 cm), and doesn’t appear particularly safe or practical to use with a bicycle, even when dismounted.

The crossing point at the shopping centre entrance on Endeavour Avenue has no refuge island at all, and vehicles frequently enter and exit the car park at relatively high speeds, so it already feels somewhat unsafe even as a pedestrian.

So while TfNSW may designate this as cycling infrastructure, the physical infrastructure on site doesn’t appear to have been upgraded to reflect that designation.

The path through the centre reserve also doesn’t currently have any signage indicating shared path status, which is why I had mapped it as "bicycle=yes". That said, if you feel the TfNSW designation is sufficient justification here, I’m happy to leave that section as-is.

For the section along Endeavour Avenue specifically, I think it would make more sense to follow the “ground truth” principle and map it as "bicycle=no", perhaps with a note/comment explaining the discrepancy with the TfNSW dataset. What do you think?

Kind regards,
Chris.
AntBurnett (2026-05-25 07:53:55+00:00): Hi Chris,
Great to have a local on the ground verifying this data. Thank you for the feedback. I've spoken with the Active Transport team about their sources and they state the cycleway data comes from Penrith Council and is not a Transport NSW designation. Other than State-managed roads, they rely on council submissions. I've seen other paths that I would classify as foot path in local parks and so on, but is in the council data as a cycleway.
If a tag for the width is added it will bubble up as a query for confirmation by both TfNSW and Penrith Council. Labelling a path as a cycleway is sometimes a loaded idea - not all cycleways are equal!
kurisubrooks (2026-05-25 08:54:45+00:00): Thanks for the super quick response! I’ll go out there with a tape measure the next time I can so I can add more detail to this segment in particular. I do have my trusty OSM Surveyor high vis so I probably won’t look too suspicious doing it. 
Do TfNSW/Penrith council monitor OSM for this kind of data? I know both teams make heavy use of ArcGIS/ESRI as their stack, which uses OSM data for their base maps, but I wouldn’t expect either to be alerted for discrepancies based on tags like this. 
I wonder if it might also be worth contacting Penrith Council about this matter or surfacing/advocating for a proper cycle network around the suburb 🤔
Gives me a few ideas. Again, thanks for your response.
AntBurnett (2026-05-25 09:01:25+00:00): I can 100% guarantee that TfNSW does monitor OSM for changes to the cycling network. And it works both directions - cycleways in OSM that are not in the Open Data are being sent back to the councils for verification.
kurisubrooks (2026-05-25 09:05:55+00:00): Fascinating! What do you recommend I do in this case? Downgrade to bicycle=no + add surveyed width and grade tags? Or would adding the width and grade tags, maybe a note be enough for them to notice? I’ll get out there with my gear when I’m able.
aharvey (2026-05-25 11:19:53+00:00): The TfNSW cycleway data should only be used to generate hints of where there could be things wrong in OSM, but we shouldn't be using it as a source of truth, because it's not always correct.

Changes to OSM should only happen by cross checking with other sources like street level imagery such as Mapillary, or aerial imagery such as the DCS NSW Imagery, and reviewing the history of the features being edited. If in doubt best to leave a map not to ask someone to check on the ground.

Otherwise it's an import, and it should go through the import proposal process.
ieguy3 (2026-04-30 03:09:37+00:00): https://planning.rctlma.org/sites/g/files/aldnop416/files/migrated/Portals-14-genplan-general-Plan-2017-areaplans-TCAP-120616.pdf
KingVik (2026-07-24 22:29:59+00:00): Reverted Poor Quality AI Imported data during AfricaMap Cup
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-30 05:32:53+00:00): Hi Nike Rose, welcome to OSM.

You created several duplicate buildings here.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1506448882
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1506448884

Best regards.
Roydon Olive (2026-05-10 10:05:12+00:00): You removed landuse=farmland from a giant chunk of farmland because one tiny corner of it is going to be used for a road now?
joshnolan (2026-04-30 05:35:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
It seems you've used OM for this edits, so chances you read this comment are slim.
But anyway, since this incorrectly tagged 'cave entrance' is also tagged with 'Arava 3', it's safe to assume that you meant to simply map an address.
To my knowledge, Arava 3 is the building adjacent to the added 'cave entrance', so I will kindly delete it and tag the building with the address.
Let me know if you got any questions!
pwbriggs (2026-04-30 04:17:13+00:00): This looks good; thanks for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
NieWnen (2026-04-30 11:43:28+00:00): Jaki sens ma dodawanie motor_vehicle=unknown do tracka?

Tym bardziej, ze widzę, ze robisz to masowo i wygląda jak zwykły spam.
lunar_jaws812 (2026-04-30 04:55:11+00:00): Hi, you've added ~80 surveillance nodes (mostly ALPRs) in the same small area over the past few days. All of them are tagged as pointing in the same direction (direction=359). I have my doubts about whether all of these nodes accurately reflect physical reality. Would you be able to provide additional information about these edits?