piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-07-30 19:46:37+00:00): Hi kaakko, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Modified relation structure."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-26 08:55:07+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/850669460/history has building = pharmacy that was added in this edit
is it an attempt to map amenity=pharmacy ? How building constructed for pharmacy would be meaningfully distinct from other building=retail ?
frozenrabi (2025-07-31 13:36:47+00:00): Hi cehwitham,
Please allow me to suggest you to make a great polygons while mapping farmlands and residential areas. Be a bit more precise. Do not make a random square, rectangle covering all the area and beyond. During cartographic analysis, such data are considered a noise. Thank you and happy mapping!
NeisBot (2025-07-30 19:48:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-31 19:22:35+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/169786967
MatyldaBaby (2025-07-31 19:28:43+00:00): Apologies, how can I correct it? I am new to mapping. Many thanks, Hana
NeisReview (2025-07-31 19:38:57+00:00): Thank you for your reply. The mentioned entry has already been corrected.

Best regards.
MatyldaBaby (2025-07-31 19:40:41+00:00): That's very kind, thank you!
Supaplex030 (2025-07-31 14:11:13+00:00): Hallo, entlang der Erich-Weinert-Straße (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4615321) ist mir gerade aufgefallen, dass du an ein paar Stellen Gehwegvorstreckungen (crossing:kerb_extension) gemappt hattest, wo eigentlich gar keine sind, z.B. zwischen dieser (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613713380) und dieser (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10688182926) Stelle. Habe es hier bereits korrigiert – wollte nur noch mal bescheid geben, falls es sich dabei um einen systematischen Fehler handeln sollte.

lg, Alex
AndreaDp271 (2025-07-31 11:12:36+00:00): Thank you for your contribution but try to make smaller changeset areas. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
kapazao (2025-08-06 08:24:35+00:00): Hola, por favor los techos de las gasolineras no son gasolineras. Esto crea duplicidades innecesarias.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/696141792/history/2
Un saludo
Leo Slager (2025-07-30 23:06:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Graptemys (2025-07-30 20:30:22+00:00): https://www.cambridgema.gov/-/media/Files/Traffic/steelplaceresolution.pdf
SmithyScotland (2025-07-31 16:38:16+00:00): Thank you for your work on Grainger Market. Well done.
JanezPavelZebovec (2025-07-31 21:36:39+00:00): Sorry for large changeset. Should have split it.
Allroads (2025-07-31 01:42:07+00:00): Hallo, 

Ik loop al een tijdje mee binnen de OSM community, ik heb hier bewust deze keuze gemaakt om het verschil te maken.

Nu heb je al mijn detail tagging verwijderd, ik heb daar speciale preset voor. Ook belangrijke uitlijn nodes.
Zelfs lowered kerbs en high kerbs, die had ik allemaal toegevoegd in Emmeloord. Uren werk, survey fot nemen en invoeren. Uitlijnen.

Brandgangen waren goed getagt.

m.a.w ik ben totaal niet blij met je tagging. Temeer, omdat ik dit gebruik voor het verbeteren van wheelchair navigatie. Ik was aan het testen en dacht wat klopt er nu niet.

Ga je deze changesets allemaal goed  terug draaien?

Zodat ik het niet hoef te controleren of alles goed terug gezet is.

Je hebt duidelijk kunnen zien, dat hier een ervaren mapper bezig is geweest die alles heeft aangepakt. Ik verwonder mij daar dan ook over, dat je eerst niet contact met mij heb opgenomen.

Groeten Allroads
Xyberion (2025-07-31 20:33:52+00:00): Hoi Allroads,

Bedankt voor je bericht. Ik ben hier inderdaad erg rigoureus te werk gegaan, waarbij ik veel van jouw data verwijderd heb met mijn aanpassingen. Excuus dat ik dit zonder overleg heb gedaan.

Ik heb de changesets in Emmeloord nu teruggedraaid, zover ik weet volledig. Dit is echter de eerste keer dat ik changesets heb teruggedraaid, dus ik zou je willen vragen om (steeksproefsgewijs) te controleren of dit jouw data juist heeft teruggezet. 

Als alles weer terug staat zoals het hoort, zou ik graag met je overleggen over een aantal voorstellen voor wijzigingen aan de tags die je gebruikt hebt. En verder heb ik ook wat vragen over uitlijn nodes e.d.

Nogmaals sorry voor het gebrek aan overleg, ik hoop dat we vanaf hier de samenwerking kunnen oppakken.

Groet,

Wouter
Allroads (2025-08-01 14:52:39+00:00): Hoi, ik snel even gekeken. Maar nog niet intensief wat is teru gedraaid.

Bij terugdraaien wat ik via JOSM doe is het beste om de jongste changset eerst te pakken en zo naar de oudste toe te werken. Niet alleen in Emmeloord maar ook in andere plaatsen heb ik deze tags gezet zo ook andere.
De komende dagen ... kom ik er niet aan toe om intensiever te kijken, ik ben op pad.

Groeten Allroads.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-30 20:51:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9789839795
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196548283

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
uprkos (2025-07-30 22:03:48+00:00): Poprawione.
user_5359 (2025-07-31 09:50:20+00:00): Hello! Please have a look https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2915. What is the mean of tag + = yes ?
Donaufelder (2025-08-03 15:57:02+00:00): hi,
i am an absolute beginner in editing osm.
did i do something wrong while i was adding the ETCS-property to the railwayline?
george1201 (2025-07-31 13:24:47+00:00): Hallo miguel-ka,
du hast an die Leitplanke https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135764472 ein bicycle=no angefügt. Macht das Sinn?
Darf man auf den von dir angepassten Abschnitten der Wolfartsweierer Straße wirklich nicht radfahren? Ich kann mich nicht erinnern, dass es dort ein entsprechendes Schild gibt. Aber vielleicht sollte ich nochmal vorbeischauen.
Nakaner (2025-08-01 20:48:04+00:00): Hallo miguel-ka,

motorroad=yes impliziert biycle=no (und noch mehr). Die Änderungen waren daher überflüssig.

Viele Grüße

Michael
george1201 (2025-08-01 21:51:00+00:00): Aber fast alle (bis auf einen) von miguel-ka geänderten Straßenabschnitte haben KEIN motorroad=yes. Hier frage ich mich schon, worauf sich das Radfahrverbot gründet.
Bei der Leitplanke habe ich jetzt bicycle=no entfernt. Auch wenn man Kunstradfahrer sein muss, um darauf entlangzufahren :-)
george1201 (2025-08-01 22:42:54+00:00): Mapillary sagt mir, dass die KFZ-Straße schon bei der Einmündung der Ottostraße beginnt. Da muss man wohl was korrigieren. Das Radfahrverbot ergibt sich dann automatisch, so wie @Nakaner geschrieben hat.
george1201 (2025-08-02 21:20:37+00:00): Ich habe das bicyle=no durch bicycle=use_sidepath ersetzt. An den Stellen gibt es nämlich separat eingetragene designierte Radwege. Ein DE:254 (Verbot für Radverkehr) auf der Straße habe ich dort noch nie gesehen.
RicoElectrico (2026-03-14 10:41:22+00:00): Hej, dodałem kolejny budynek. Jesteś w stanie sprawdzić jak teraz ma się sprawa z ogrodzeniem? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5203991
martianfreeloader (2025-07-31 08:53:50+00:00): Hi, thanks for detailing the area. Ways like this are probably better tagged highway=unclassified as it is clearly not in a residential area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418759801
Badojo (2025-07-31 13:17:53+00:00): Hi, as for that way there are a few houses on it that I didn't add yet so I thought of it more as a residential street
martianfreeloader (2025-07-31 15:19:11+00:00): Thanks for the swift reply.

Ok, I guess some of them can be considered residential buildings. I've added them on the map.
AndreaDp271 (2025-07-31 11:10:08+00:00): Thank you for your contribution but try to make smaller changeset areas. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169741582
Filip009 (2025-08-02 12:14:31+00:00): Zdravím, tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13038103001 sa v strede rieky nachádza možnosť napustiť si bandasky s vodou? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=water%20point
LukášBelica (2025-08-03 18:49:50+00:00): Áno
Filip009 (2025-08-03 18:54:18+00:00): Nemáte náhodou fotografiu?
HellMap (2025-07-31 10:23:18+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for your map updates!

I just wanted to note that if you change `maxspeed` value, there may also be a `maxspeed:type` value for the source of the limit. For example, here `maxspeed:type=LV:urban` means the implied speed is 50. So you should either remove the value or change it something like `sign` or `LV:zone30`.

I fixed these here.

Cheers
z11120 (2025-08-31 08:24:44+00:00): Bonjour, 
Vous avez modifié l'école primaire de Camplong d'aude en Mairie, alors que la Mairie était déjà cartographié juste à côté :
https://osm.org/go/xVO5HPqCL?layers=N&node=1939792451
Pourriez-vous annuler vos modifications ? 
Cordialement, z11120.
Leso_KN (2025-08-31 08:52:47+00:00): Oui, c'est vrai, pardon ! Modifié dans https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2457094481/history/10
z11120 (2025-08-31 09:03:21+00:00): Merci beaucoup, Osmose va être content  !!!
user_5359 (2025-07-31 10:24:35+00:00): Hello! What is the mean of the tag library:users = public? Did you known the key library (482) or library:type (239)? What is the difference between booth keys and your new key?
andrewth1 (2025-07-31 14:45:38+00:00): My intention is to be more specific about who can use a library, and introduce a standard set of values. In this case, it is members of the public. Please see my proposal at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Library_Types . You are welcome to discuss this proposal on the wiki talk page.
user_5359 (2025-07-31 15:02:08+00:00): Sorry, I relied too much on taginfo displaying the wiki entry more promptly. 

I would be grateful if the existing keys were mentioned in the proposal and if the suggestion with library:for were also mentioned as a possible alternative (however, I haven't had time to read all the contributions in full yet). One reason against for would be, for example, that here it is usually gender (clothes:for) or age (social_facility:for) that is differentiated.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-07-30 21:48:01+00:00): Nie jednego budynku, a altan, które zostały dodane jako budynki jednorodzinne.
Adam Dunn (2025-07-31 22:07:09+00:00): Thanks for updating this! I drove through some of the changes this morning with my GPS so I could update things, but looks like you beat me to it!
user_21736114 (2025-07-31 03:58:18+00:00): у кадастрі Шкільна вулиця https://kadastr.live/?orto-tiles=false&dzk__index_map_lines=true#18.29/46.51329/30.320883 звідки ти взяв Смородинова поясни
NeisBot (2025-07-31 01:36:30+00:00): Hi Koste94, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added a new fire hydrant with specific attributes."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #NoComment #AIgenerated
user_5359 (2025-07-31 16:44:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't add private information like parking_space or "Home" to the map. Was the garage destroyed?
dazzlemn (2025-07-31 16:55:50+00:00): No- The garage is fine. I was trying to stable the space next to the garage as a waypoint, so I could make it a destination for my FSD tesla...
user_5359 (2025-07-31 17:28:36+00:00): You can add a line with highway=service and service=driveway (from the alley to the garage entry.
dknelson9876 (2025-07-31 02:13:08+00:00): Hi Ortega, you commented that you changed the address, but what you actually did is deleted the amenity tag so that this is no longer a fast food place. Was this on purpose?
Ortega Omega (2025-07-31 02:16:19+00:00): No that was by accident my apologies. Hopefully I changed the address correctly because the pin is still in the same location. We actually moved to 1249 E 3300 S, Millcreek Utah 84106
dknelson9876 (2025-07-31 02:24:47+00:00): Sounds good. I'll put fast_food back, and move the pin to your new location for you
Ortega Omega (2025-07-31 02:32:50+00:00): Ur amazing bro. Thank u so much 👍
Filip009 (2025-08-02 12:08:28+00:00): Zdravím, tá obtiažnosť už bola tu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:via ferrata scale. Nemyslím, že je nutné ju dávať aj do name.
Matúš Jančík (2025-08-02 16:10:58+00:00): Ahoj, je to uzitocne, zobrazuje to potom priamo v mape. napr. freemap alebo mapy.cz.

odpozeral som to na nejakych hotovych
Filip009 (2025-08-02 16:18:57+00:00): Okej, potom je to tagovanie pre renderer https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Zna%C4%8Den%C3%AD_pro_vykreslov%C3%A1n%C3%AD. V tomto prípade by bolo lepšie prinútiť dané mapy k tomu, aby to zobrazovali automaticky, z tagu, aby nebolo nutné dávať všetko do name.
Filip009 (2025-08-02 12:21:22+00:00): Zdravím, z tejto cesty ste odtránil všetko tagovanie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418769937 Prosím opravte si to
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-08-04 10:16:17+00:00): Is it a permanent block or temporary?
Alexcunn (2025-07-30 22:49:01+00:00): Sorry, forgot to comment. The boundary is estimated
VictorIE (2026-04-03 10:35:32+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418776525/

fixme="Can't find the source of this three-phase line to either the north or the south (N/O recloser means it must be fed from both ends)"

If you look at this pole: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13038234021/ on Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta it appears to be guyed. This suggests there might be a transition, but is no way conclusive.
PluMGMK (2026-04-03 11:49:13+00:00): Oops, no, that fixme shouldn't be there! It was on a different line, which I must have continued and split several times, and forgot to take it off this particular split.

I think I solved the original issue some time ago…

Thanks for pointing it out! This inspired me to go fill in a few more gaps around here just now!
PluMGMK (2026-04-03 21:29:15+00:00): This is the line I was referring to: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/522113928
German C (2025-12-04 13:02:06+00:00): Hola Lolj, ¿por qué eliminaste el bosque que está junto al río? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=169744814 (en rojo esta resaltado el bosque que eliminaste)
BCNorwich (2025-07-31 05:00:18+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The building is mapped as tourism=hostel so a separate node is not needed. It's the YHA London St Pancras.

Regards Bernard.
Sytys (2025-08-01 00:24:20+00:00): is the road entirely closed to any use or is it just the main inlet and outlet that are closed?
Joseph R P (2025-08-05 21:34:05+00:00): The whole road is closed as of now. Some paving work is complete but it remains accessible only to construction traffic.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-30 23:50:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418781208

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
fortera_au (2025-07-31 10:42:24+00:00): If this is now a through road open to the public, you'll need to remove access=private.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169745524
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-31 00:11:10+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1062268923

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2026-03-04 20:21:37+00:00): Moin :)

was denn hier passiert? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13038313059/history

Hinweis zu Barrieren: Sie sollten immer mit mindestens einem Punkt auch mit dem Weg, den sie für bestimmte Verkehrsmittel sperren auch verbunden sein, da sie bei OSM sonst keine Wirkung entfalten.
Nüsschen (2026-03-05 05:59:26+00:00): Moin Moin,
Danke für den Hinweis! Keine Ahnung, wie der Text dort hin kam. Er ist mir weder bekannt, noch war das Absicht. Vermutlich versehentliches copy and paste.

Einen Block habe ich mit dem Weg verbunden und die Attribute entsprechend gesetzt. So müsste es passen...
VG, Nüsschen
bxl-forever (2025-07-31 08:46:12+00:00): Hello,

May I encourage you to please write useful titles to the changes you push to the OSM database.

"very insignificant edits", "miscellaneous changes" or "more random changes" are completely unhelpful for other mappers who want to understand why you started editing an area.

You are welcome if you want to improve the map, but please describe in a few words what you did.

What I see in this changeset is that you added the "direction" key to 5 give-way signs.

You may be interested to know that, whereas this key is required for two-way roads, it is absolutely unnecessary here—this is the reason why we didn’t add it in the first place, it is not because we forgot—because those are… one-way roads.  Navigation will only use them in the same direction, therefore there is no ambiguity to warn drivers of an oncoming give-way sign here.

Have a nice day.
Glassman (2025-07-31 21:47:18+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169745915
cubbe8 (2025-08-01 03:42:24+00:00): in progress
Garffo (2025-08-01 03:45:21+00:00): Thanks!
ZLima12 (2025-08-04 08:39:55+00:00): Reverted in 169940604. The Taconic is limited access, with partial controlled access. Motorway requires full controlled access, i.e. no intersections including RIROs. Currently I have the southern cutoff at US-6 because the road narrows significantly at this point and the RIROs begin shortly north of here.

Note that expressway=yes is used here on the trunk segments, which denotes the limited access nature of the road.
cubbe8 (2025-08-04 16:49:18+00:00): It appears that the situation for Taconic is that it's features can be a motorway. However it requires discussion. Another editor wanted it done which made sense. The speed limit is 55 which matches other motorways. Additionally it has no signals and very few incidental rural road intersections which don't affect the performance of the mainline. Therefore I suggest a motorway designation. Trunk seems inadequate
ZLima12 (2025-08-04 19:10:35+00:00): As mentioned, RIROs and full intersections are incompatible with motorway, so at the very least, the segments of the Taconic that have those can not be motorway. If you want to make an argument to make a fully controlled access segment motorway, that is one thing, but even then, the overall quality of the road is somewhat below a typical motorway. highway=trunk + expressway=yes is a fair combination in this case.
Hb- (2025-07-31 04:56:43+00:00): Der Hochpunkt des Weges östlich der Bahn liegt ungefähr bei dem Schuppen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/758397414 Von dort fließt der Graben Richtung Hauptstraße. Vor dem Schuppen wird wohl kein Durchlass liegen. Einige Deiner Änderungen habe ich zurückgenommen mit #169749569
user_5359 (2025-07-31 16:01:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I revert your change set, because there was no valid address near by. OSM isn't a advertising board.
felipeeugenio (2025-07-31 13:05:57+00:00): Hola. Tantas paradas de taxi solamente?
Voy a asumir que son paraderos regulares de micros.
Los arreglo. Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169747191
wadors (2025-08-01 02:15:17+00:00): Hola, hay algunos que son solo de colectivos y otros que son de ambos, bus y colectivo.
wadors (2025-08-01 02:16:42+00:00): por ejemplo, la Parada Lago Quillen es solo para colectivo, no pasan buses por ahí.
Saludos!
felipeeugenio (2025-08-05 12:47:42+00:00): ok, gracias. Lo dejé como amenity=taxi.
Cuales son para ambos?

saludos
wadors (2025-08-06 03:47:46+00:00): Ok, aqui va la lista:
Paraderos para ambos (bus y colectivo)
- Parada Oscar Lizama
- Parada Sebastián Acevedo
- Parada Lleu Lleu
- Parada Galletue
- Parada Doña Graciela
- Parada Avenida Escuadrón
Paraderos solo colectivo
- Parada Lago Quillen
- Parada Estero Manco
- Parada Los Martires
felipeeugenio (2025-08-06 13:44:48+00:00): hecho. Saludos y gracias
felipeeugenio (2025-07-31 12:55:05+00:00): Hola. Borró caminos y casas que se ve que existen. Pasó algo o se trata simplemente de un error?

saludos
Lieckio (2025-08-02 21:53:39+00:00): Why have you marked the parking as building=yes, when they are surface parkings and not buildings?
Lieckio (2025-08-02 21:56:25+00:00): Ah, it was actually just in one of them.

Is the regular tagging scheme to tag the operator only, if it's a business parking lot?
Hypsometric (2025-08-05 12:59:14+00:00): I am guessing you are wondering why the parking lot does not have a name. If so, take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only 

Tagging with operator=* is helpful. It is very helpful when access=private or access=customers is used. Then it is easy to identify which business it is for.
Lieckio (2025-08-05 21:08:45+00:00): Thank you! I had not found this article before! The Wiki is pretty confusing when it comes to details like this.

I think a great number of the parking lots in the city that I've added need to be revised and checked... I'll have to add that to my to-do list.
user_5359 (2025-08-01 17:53:54+00:00): Since Wikipedia has its own links between the different languages for an object, it is not necessary to list all of them in OSM. One version is sufficient.
JSR1781 (2025-08-01 19:11:49+00:00): Oh ok, thanks.
dadavid (2025-07-31 11:57:15+00:00): Hi, 
der Weg existiert aber doch noch und kann von Rettungskräften (und Fußgängern?) genutzt werden. Gleiche Frage hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142829885

Oder sehe ich das falsch? 

Viele Grüße

David
Wipp (2025-07-31 16:31:51+00:00): hier eingezeichnet war nicht der Weg - und auch dieser ist aufgrund des Bewuchses nur schwerlich zu begehen, geschweige denn von Rettungskräften zu nutzen.
Grüße
mcliquid (2025-07-31 03:40:13+00:00): The problem with mechanical edits is that there is no check to see whether the tagging itself was valid beforehand. There are cases that were changed, amenity=parking should have been changed entirely to amenity=parking_space with parking_space=disabled.
e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1474503695

And I guess the huge bbox could have been avoided if there had been just one edit outside GB.
Hypsometric (2025-08-01 12:58:34+00:00): Thanks for catching that. I caught a few like that but looks like this one slipped by. Also, I came across a few of these that were on the map as parking spaces but when I looked, they were not in a parking area. So some were just switched to parking lots since they were small little "lots" like this one that were off on their own.