piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Sara Newmountain (2024-02-10 15:30:41+00:00): Hello Jan!
Thank you for the feedback.
I removed the descriptions now. I thought it could be nice to know what the buillding had been before, but maybe that's not a necessary info. In two cases I added the building type.

I also removed the "f.d." in front of the names I had added it. In these cases, we still say e.g. Läkarvillan, even if it's no doctor living in the house anymore.

By the way, do you think I should let someone review my edits when submitting them? I feel sure about what I add, but I now see that I might not do some technical details "as you should". (I'm relatively new to OSM.)
02JanDal (2024-02-10 20:43:23+00:00): I think that if it's still called by it's old name (such as "Läkarvillan") then using that as the current "name" is perfectly fine and correct!

You're of course always welcome to request if review if there's something you're unsure about, but it's also no requirement if not. I sometimes use it when there's something I've not mapped previously and were I'm not sure if I've done it correctly, but not for "everyday" things. If there's something specific you're unsure about you can of course also always ask in one of the community forums (in Sweden you'll find the Facebook group, the Discourse forum and the Telegram group to be the most active).
Sara Newmountain (2024-02-21 20:26:11+00:00): Ok, good!
Thank you for sharing JanDal, good to know!
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-04 21:10:33+00:00): Buildings can be squared using "q".
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-04 21:12:18+00:00): Do not incorrectly map parking lots as buildings.  Ensure you are using the correct tags.

I have reverted/changed the features in this changeset in part or full.
matt_ellery (2024-01-06 00:50:36+00:00): Hi Martin, relation 4510978 is a residential building for students at Christ's Hospital school. I don't think building=house is an improvement on what was there before.
Martin Borsje (2024-01-06 06:40:57+00:00): You are right; I was fixing building=residential (as this is not correct) and one building slipped. I will correct.

I labeled it dormitory as adjacent building is.
silversurfer83 (2024-01-04 21:01:49+00:00): Hi there :)

you barriers (like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1237077523) do not look like guard rails to me. Maybe check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Djersey_barrier and change your tagging?

Also: You still don't give sources to your changes. It would be very helpful to others to know if you were there or if you're armchair mapping (with which imagery?).

and finally: It won't hurt if you answer comments. I believe there's still an open question in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144931846

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145896880
StC (2024-01-11 12:43:21+00:00): Bonjour,

attention que ce changeset a coupé un autre itinéraire de randonnée. Je fais la réparation.

A bientôt,

St.
laurent-38 (2024-01-11 22:47:01+00:00): Ah, désolé pour cette erreur.
Habituellement, JOSM gère correctement ces actions, alors je n'ai pas fait attention aux autres relations.
Merci pour la correction.

Cordialement,
Laurent
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2024-01-05 15:23:21+00:00): Já se ptám: Je tento úsek již postaven a zprovozněn? Nikde o novém úseku dálnice D0 nevím
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2024-01-05 15:31:56+00:00): Případně se to může převést do highway=construction + consturtion=*, i když stavba ještě nezapočala.
vojtechzaboril (2024-01-05 16:36:48+00:00): Reverted (not in constuction nor build) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145929146
MxxCon (2024-01-09 01:26:04+00:00): Hello.
There's no need to add tiger:* tags.
They are leftovers from when all these roads were originally imported into OSM. These tags are not used for anything now.
If the normal OSM tags look good, all the tiger tags can be deleted.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145897544
aharvey (2025-07-18 03:32:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169058336
NeisBot (2024-01-06 00:19:48+00:00): Hello gameswill2008, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Đuro Jiří (2024-01-05 17:05:45+00:00): Ciao fayor,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1233009922
Solo a questo punto vendita EuroSpin (negozio occupa solo edificio,zona circostante è zona commerciale) hai cancellato:
wheelchair - yes
contact:website - https://www.eurospin.it/
addr:country - IT
brand - EuroSpin
addr:city - Catania
E inoltre EuroSpin si scrive con "S" maiuscolo.
Come OVS e PENNY.
fayor (2024-01-05 17:16:20+00:00): Ciao, come forse hai potuto notare, ritengo più corretto, quando un'attività è recintata o ben individuata, mappare tutta l'area di pertinenza con i tag dell'attività stessa, in quanto l'edificio, come il parcheggio o le aree a verde, fanno parte integralmente del supermercato (o del centro commerciale, o dell'albergo, e così via). Il nome puoi trovarlo scritto EuroSpin, Euro Spin o Eurospin, come puoi vedere anche nello stesso sito https://www.eurospin.it/
L'importante è scriverlo sempre nello stesso modo e io cerco di mantenere una coerenza, almeno nelle zone in cui mappo.
BCNorwich (2024-01-05 08:41:27+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The track you removed was the service road and access to the Scout Hall. Can you state please, how the hall is now accessed? 

Regards Bernard.
eggie (2024-01-04 21:49:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-01-05 08:57:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
twz123 (2024-04-03 22:40:58+00:00): Du hast fee auf yes gesetzt. Da hier aber nur zu bestimmten Zeiten Parkgebühren anfallen, glaube ich, dass fee=no und fee:conditional=yes@ das richtige Tagging-Schema wären. Was denkst du?

Referenz z.B. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fee#Time_when_a_fee_is_charged_as_a_value_of_fee=*
TheHim (2024-04-04 15:14:59+00:00): Das war mir nicht bewusst, mit den beschränkten Zeiten. Ich denke dein Vorschlag (no+cond=yes@) wäre dann richtig. Falls du die Zeiten kennst und mit eintragen könntest wäre das noch besser. Danke!
TheHim (2024-04-06 04:15:29+00:00): Die Zeiten stehen ja schon da, mein Fehler. Sehe auch, dass du das wohl warst :)
twz123 (2024-04-15 10:45:37+00:00): Alles klar. Hab die Gebühren eingetragen. Anscheinend war das Format für fee:conditional auch noch nicht ganz richtig. (Changeset 150030581)
flohoff (2024-01-05 10:29:42+00:00): So mal als positives Feedback.

Die maxspeeds und lanes/lane_markings=no haben eine auswirkung aufs routing.

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=665866,669782

So ist die route geschwenkt nach der änderung. Von Rot auf Grün ... Ich hab keine Ahnung ob das besser oder schlechter ist. Aber - es tut sich was.


Flo
rempshaener (2024-01-05 20:11:02+00:00): Hallo,
vielen lieben Dank fürs Feedback. Schon interessant, dass selbst auf dicht befahrenen Landesstraßen viele Infos noch fehlen. Da ist noch Luft nach oben.
Viele Grüße
Filip009 (2024-01-05 20:55:18+00:00): Keď je shop=florist nemusíš mu to duplikovať aj do mena :)
vasony (2024-01-07 21:49:16+00:00): Szia!

A csomagpont az üzlet egy tulajdonsága.
Az összevonás azt jelentette volna, hogy rámásolod a kulcsokat a coopra és törlöd ezt a csomagpontot, nem azt hogy postát csinálsz belőle.
Most javítottam.

Tamás
BeanieBarrow (2024-01-07 23:04:57+00:00): Rendben! Elnézést a félreértésért. Legközelebb majd így csinálom. Köszi a segítséget!
- Bence
eggie (2024-01-05 10:11:32+00:00): Dag thickness

Je vraagt feedback  De eenrichting is hier een beetje onlogisch . Ook de wegklasse: service of woonerf?

MVG
eggie
gpserror (2024-01-07 02:15:26+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for updating this!  Just wanted to note that some of the old obsolete data is still there, not sure if organic maps can fix this but if you could, delete the old data (Lucky)?  Unfortunately I don't know how to use organic maps so can't help you there, but if you aren't sure what to do, I can delete the old data for you if you wish.  Thanks again!
Carto_Ferret (2024-01-04 22:51:52+00:00): Correction: Source used was Mapillary
VA00 (2025-11-06 20:11:30+00:00): Autor uwagi twierdzi, że nie ma tu przejazdu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4984594
yawfle (2024-01-05 02:55:46+00:00): There's a good write-up about about road classification from a local mapper here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/willkmis/diary/399345

It might also be a good place for a discussion about odd mixed-use developments like this one. I always meant to get back to this and clean up some of the quick'n'dirty editing I did previously (just to get it more or less usable by routers)... maybe I'll do that now. I have no idea what I was thinking with those layer=-1 tags, probably editing as I was falling asleep. :D
HeyRayReh (2024-01-05 15:15:47+00:00): As somebody who lived in Chicago for a decade, referring to it as a "not-growing urban population" is the most tactful way I've ever heard somebody say "nobody wants to live in Illinois anymore" 😂😂😂
Strubbl (2024-08-11 21:31:11+00:00): Hi Skyhead, kannst du bitte mal in den Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4378674 schauen? Dort ist die Frage nach dem entfernten access=no Tag offen.
Viele Grüße
VLD170 (2024-01-17 16:59:39+00:00): Hello dmich9, 

I noticed that the name label for Yamba lake was moved when the relation (r4562393) was removed and now is only on W1237112551. I wanted to reach out and ask if there is a plan to restore the name to the rest of the lake or perhaps combine these relations back together with the updated geometry?

Matt
vicente lopez 2021 (2024-01-05 00:26:36+00:00): tambien el bypass de san jose de mayo  me ayudarias a corregir
muralito (2024-01-05 01:33:07+00:00): Ese ya lo hice. Bastante bien, pero las imagenes que consegui muestran las rotondas y alguna cosa mas. Lo grueso está.
citrula (2024-01-05 04:07:11+00:00): You can set Pickle Parkway as the official_name if people don't refer to it that way locally.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145900808
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 12:33:10+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11489150608/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop?
gscholz (2024-01-10 08:20:07+00:00): Hi kenth1977,
this changeset has created errors regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-83.98362&lat=9.88106&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145901278

This kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2024-01-21 09:48:16+00:00): Hi kenth1977, 
due to your missing response I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
gscholz (2024-01-07 09:23:51+00:00): Hi kenth1977,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-83.97983&lat=9.88729&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145901327

This kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-18 14:19:34+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11489395438/history has fixme:type = park that was added in this edit
Have you tried to map a park here? If yes, then maybe leisure=park would fit?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dpark
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-18 14:24:00+00:00): and is it simply duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478415201 ?

(though name is different - maybe both should be marked?)
Javierpf (2024-01-06 15:04:30+00:00): Hola Vicente, voy a revertir este cambio. Esta bueno dejar la ruta vieja por un tiempo, un año, para evidenciar el cambio.
La ruta que borraste ya estaba tageada en desuso/obsoleta, pq lo que no afecta al ruteo, etc.
Mihai Spătaru (2024-01-22 10:29:40+00:00): Salut, uite în acest comunicat am găsit că suprafața taberei e mult mai mică https://www.parlament.md/Actualitate/Comunicatedepresa/tabid/90/ContentId/9589/language/ro-RO/Default.aspx - „Documentul prevede retragerea din circuitul agricol, pentru necesități de stat și publice, a două terenuri agricole în scopul construcției unei tabere militare moderne. Este vorba despre un teren cu suprafața de 7,6 ha, administrat de Agenția Proprietăți Publice, aflat în gestiunea Ministerului Agriculturii și Industriei Alimentare și a unui teren cu suprafața de circa 18,7 ha, administrat de Agenția Proprietăți Publice, aflat în gestiunea Ministerului Educației și Cercetării, situate în extravilanul comunei Băcioi, municipiul Chișinău.”
Pe eCadastru văd că sunt și delimitate, mă gândesc că totuși așa ar trebui să arate tabară
Moldovan_Merkator (2024-01-22 16:58:50+00:00): Salut, desigur că cunosc că trebuie să separe terenul pentru tabără de cel al CSTSP, cînd va fi delimitat voi reactualiza, dar la moment nu cred că este posibil de definit cum ei doresc să le separe
Mihai Spătaru (2024-01-22 17:40:17+00:00): Pe eCadastru este deja delimitat, 5511104.105 - 7.6ha
Moldovan_Merkator (2024-01-23 21:42:55+00:00): Da, ai dreptate,greșeala mea, nu am observat faptul că ei au decis să dea sub tabără așa teritoriu mic, se putea mai mult.
Moldovan_Merkator (2024-01-23 21:43:06+00:00): Am corectat
Mihai Spătaru (2024-01-24 10:26:46+00:00): Tu ești bravo, asta ai noștri fac economie :D
mavl (2026-05-03 05:38:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 182142872 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20224].
TheSwavu (2024-01-05 10:42:46+00:00): Changeset reverted because it broke the boundary of Lower North East Special Management Zone Number 1 Protected Area

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145916117
VLD305 (2024-01-05 20:14:09+00:00): Hi TheSwavu, Thanks for reviewing my changeset. Running a validator check on relation 16308779 I noted 210 instances of the multipolygon’s rings with shared boundary node issues. Could you specify where you noted the boundaries to be broken so we can address the validation issues comprehensively?
vasony (2024-01-07 22:13:02+00:00): Kedves György!

Mi az Ibolya lépcső forrása? Budapest közterület jegyzékében ilyen nem szerepel.

Tamás
hildgyorgy (2024-01-08 07:27:23+00:00): Kedves Tamás! Köszönöm szépen az észrevételt! Nagyon érdekes, én sem tudtam róla. Furcsa, hogy az Apple Maps jelöli így! Utánanéztem, és valóban hivatalosan nincs, ez a közterület nem létezik. De a lépcső - ugyan nagyon rossz állapotban - de ott van. Az 1929-es Tisza István liget felosztási térképén szerepel ez a név, de a forrásokl szerint akkor is inkább a környékbeli lakók adták neki ezt a nevet. Mit javasolsz? Szeretném megőrizni az elnevezést, hogy ne menjen feledésbe és miután nincs másik neve azóta se, ezért jónak tartanám az Ibolya-lépcső nevet. De természetesen szívesen teszek valamilyen megjegyzést, vagy egy “old-name” tag-et. Üdv, Gyuri
urbalazs (2024-01-08 09:28:45+00:00): A loc_name lesz a jó címke hozzá. Hasonló a helyzet itt is: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/15230148
vasony (2024-01-08 09:31:27+00:00): Szia!

Annyi kiegészítésként, hogy a noname=yes címke is szükséges ha nincs neve a loc_name mellé.

Illetve, ha rossz állapotú, akkor ezt a smoothness/trail_visibility címkében érdemes lenne jelezni.

Szerintem az Ady lépcső kicsit odébb is hasonló kategória lehet (bár nem voltam ott, nem tudom van-e ott bármi felirat), súlyosbítva azzal, hogy ott a buszmegállónak legalább ez a neve, erről mit gondolsz?

Tamás
hildgyorgy (2024-01-09 08:54:55+00:00): Szia Tamás! köszi a segítséget! Az Ady lépcsővel más a helyzet, az se túl fényes állapotú, de legalább még használható. És használja is az a 10 ember/év aki az Ady lépcső megállónál száll fel/le a 63-asra...:)
Kijavítottam a címkéket. És gondosan megírtam, hogy miket módosítottam :)
hildgyorgy (2024-01-09 08:56:56+00:00): És Balázsnak is köszönöm! Üdv, Gyuri
MxxCon (2024-01-09 01:45:27+00:00): What that website shows is the actual separation between hospital and the new development?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145902443
Robin Zyx (2024-01-16 01:03:41+00:00): There's no actual "air gap" between the buildings involved and the rest of the hospital that I am aware of. But I haven't been in that part of the hospital, so don't know if they blocked off connecting hallways/doorways or what. I assume at some point building footprints will need to be updated here due to the work the developers have done. I wasn't aware of how much they did until reading that article.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-01-05 01:20:00+00:00): 之前就想把这个站抓紧改名（2号的时候查廊坊站就看到这个没改名了 https://t.me/OpenRailwayMap/19/934 ）
但是一直耽误到现在，直到再次被人指出 https://t.me/osmchina/93421/121717
橘ヒカリ (2024-01-05 17:10:57+00:00): 之前我改了，不知道又被谁改回去了。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145902481
vicente lopez 2021 (2024-01-05 01:37:05+00:00): ahora falta lo de parque del plata
NeisBot (2024-01-12 00:22:32+00:00): Hello tmz19890431, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-05 01:50:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Szarbsko":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4148680737
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11489844094
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11489844124
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11489844133

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-05 02:00:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11489954515

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-05 02:20:44+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11489844133
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11489844124
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11489844094
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11489954515
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4148680737
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/847929398
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217970431
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217970444
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217970449
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217970479

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Jrachi (2024-01-05 19:23:25+00:00): Hai disegnato le aree residenziali passando sopra degli edifici già mappati.
Fedurli (2024-01-05 19:51:59+00:00): Non ho capito cosa intendi.
Jrachi (2024-01-05 20:07:08+00:00): Ma dai!
Quando disegni l'area devi racchiudere case e cose che si possono considerare residenziali.
Ma devi evitare di tracciare linee attraverso gli edifici.
Ma non ricevi degli avvisi dal editor quando fai queste cose?
Jrachi (2024-01-05 20:11:32+00:00): Quando disegni edifici devi evitare di disegnare sopra le strade.
Jrachi (2024-01-05 20:14:54+00:00): I parcheggi disegnati come area andrebbero collegati ad una strada.
Fedurli (2024-01-05 20:20:39+00:00): 1) non ho disegnato dei parcheggi;
2) l'avviso di conflitto avviene per elementi dello stesso tipo, ad esempio edificio/edificio.
3) Ovviamente se ciò è avvenuto non è voluto, dato che non ha senso non includere un edificio all'interno di un'area residenziale, infatti ti chiederei di indicare il punto dove è successo
Jrachi (2024-01-05 20:33:48+00:00): 1) Percorso: 487449422
  Insieme dei dati: 672d1839
  Modificato il: 2017-04-17T14:38:05Z
  Modificato da: Fedurli (4795149)
  Versione: 1
  Nel gruppo di modifiche: 47873685
  Etichette: 
    "amenity"="parking"

Edifici:
way 853101977
way 853102015
way 853102017
way 853102016
E area residenziale:
way 854352880
Nel futuro disegna guardando su cosa disegni.
Jrachi (2024-01-05 20:34:38+00:00): Vedo che anche qui continua a inserire name e ref su way che fanno parte di relazioni.
Fedurli (2024-01-05 21:18:50+00:00): I REF SU WAY CHE FANNO PARTE DI RELAZIONI VANNO MESSI! E' la quinta volta, è scritto in italiano!
Fedurli (2024-01-06 01:06:18+00:00): Sei veramente andato a cercare una modifica del 2017? Ahahah
Jrachi (2024-01-06 07:24:35+00:00): No sono andato a cercare una modifica del 2017. Ho trovato una tua modifica che richiedeva una spiegazione.
Mica scadono le responsabilità del mappatore.
E dimmi dove hai letto che "I REF SU WAY CHE FANNO PARTE DI RELAZIONI VANNO MESSI!"
E senza alzare la voce.
Grazie
Fedurli (2024-01-07 01:22:53+00:00): Ma capisci che è la quinta volta che te lo ripeto ed è la seconda volta che lo riporto: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:ref

Ma siccome è un elemento previsto per le way, sarebbe più opportuno che mi dicessi tu dove sta scritto che  il ref non va messo in presenza di relation. E soprattutto perché ti ostini a rimuovere elementi corretti, come i ref e i nomi nei way (tipo strada Pratolanzo, che nel caso sarebbe divenuta Strada Provinciale 34 di Rocca Canavese e non "la strada non ha nome".
Jrachi (2024-01-07 06:31:59+00:00): E sarà la ennesima volta che ti faccio notare che su quella pagina non parla nemmeno di consigliato fare così o cosà.
E non mi ostino.
Da come dici sembra abbia cancellato il ref su quella strada 5 volte mentre è stata solo una.
Il tuo modo di taggare non è sgradito solo a me.
Infine, perché sarebbe un disastro che una strada abbia solo l'appartenenza ad una SP?
Per il 2024 si spera di riuscire ad avere lo stradario dei comuni della zona e questo, è sicuro, toglierà molti dubbi, anche se non porterà nomi nuovi alle strade, e nemmeno verranno tolti i cartelli che indicano il nome della località e vengono considerati nomi della via.
Fedurli (2024-01-08 02:24:41+00:00): L'elemento ref è previsto per i way e quella pagina ti spiega come usarlo; il fatto di usare il ref sulla way non deve intaccare la relazione che è assolutamente corretto che ci sia, ma sono due cose che viaggiano parallelamente e hanno due finalità differenti.
Non è che è "un mio modo di taggare", è quanto prevede OSM per i way, non vedo cosa ci possa essere di sgradito.
Non ho capito la domanda, ma se una strada ha un suo nome, diventa un errore non riportarlo e far risultare la mappa "bianca".