piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
VLD0251 (2026-07-22 21:33:25+00:00): Hello, the satellite imagery does not confirm the presence of a "حديقة عمومية" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344338875 at this location. it would be better to verify the type of feature before using "leisure=garden". regarding the name, removing the existing name and replacing it with a generic translation without adding "name:fr" results in a loss of information. please also provide the source of the newly added name and review these points according to OpenStreetMap conventions.
Happy mapping !
Udarian (2026-07-21 18:48:43+00:00): what are you even trying to represent here because a bus stop is not the best way to represent what the name claims it is, a ferry would probably be much closer.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-23 14:03:09+00:00): Please provide photographic evidence.  name=* should only be the name, branch=* is for branch information.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186123616
rarad74 (2026-07-22 11:49:31+00:00): Buna. Vezi ca daugi o categorie inexistenta pentru tag-ul building:condition. Nu exista vre-o posibilitate de a mapa corect claidirle cu risc seismic pe openstreetmap. Au mai incerct si altii. Va rog renuntati, ca pana la urma o sa stricati cladirile. aici aici documentatia wiki cu toate categoriile accceptate: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:condition
rhhs (2026-07-27 17:07:19+00:00): Hi, seems there's a typo in the opening hours of Ekaterina beauty. Should "afr" be "Fr"?
Casual Mapper (2026-07-28 04:23:17+00:00): Hi! Yes, good catch! I've fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186495972
felipeeugenio (2026-07-21 22:52:56+00:00): Edición reversada por completo. Cambios que no solo no fueron discutidos con la comunidad a categorias de caminos y poblados, si no que además evidentemente incorrectos. Agregado de muy bajo estándar de edificios,
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186124159
felipeeugenio (2026-07-21 22:55:24+00:00): Se procede al bloqueo temporal de la cuenta.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186124159
Maid Marian (2026-07-27 15:44:36+00:00): Öffnungszeiten Müller Späti:
So-Do 10:00-24:00  Uhr
Fr & Da 10:00-03:00 Uhr
hoserab (2026-07-23 15:24:49+00:00): I know this building was being converted to apartments. The building was originally built for the offices of Canadian Fina Oil Ltd., a subsidiary of the Belgian company Petrofina, and I've seen the names "Fina Tower", "Petrofina Tower", "Petrofina Building", and variations with the alternative spellings "PetroFina" and "Petro Fina". However, for decades there's been a sign in big, bright red letters above the main entrance saying "FINA BUILDING"; has that sign been modified or removed?

Absent any change to the signage, per good practice (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground) we ought to defer to "what's on the ground".
user_5359 (2026-07-23 10:54:42+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14031456165 (one of more than 3,900 objects). What is the mean of the tags
con = https://www.gstatic.com/mapspro/images/stock/503-wht-blank_maps.png
icon-color = #ffea00
icon-opacity = 1
icon-scale = 1
label-scale = 0
styleUrl = #icon-1739-FFEA00-nodesc
?
balint36 (2026-07-23 18:41:56+00:00): A szelvénykövek elhelyezkedése milyen adatforrásból származik? A jelölésük is helytelen, mert name címkét nem kapnak, ref-be nem kerül vonalszám, viszont a railway:position hiányzik.
user_5359 (2026-07-30 18:11:06+00:00): Hello @Outsidertwo!
Please reply, otherwise your edit will have to be deleted

Kérlek, válaszolj, különben törölni kell a módosításodat
Nicola Smaniotto (2026-07-21 19:40:50+00:00): Ciao Daniele. Hai dimenticato di aggiornare alcuni tag del distributore, come wikidata. Da browser ti dovrebbe consigliare delle modifiche automatiche per sistemare.
user_5359 (2026-07-23 11:10:06+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14031472904 (one of eight objects). What is the mean of the tag
RPO = Deliver at least 20% of all new housing in rural areas on brownfield sites.
?
NoelB (2026-07-23 14:00:16+00:00): that was something i pasted into OSM by accident. I have from it. thanks for telling me.
noahheffron (2026-07-21 17:42:28+00:00): This node, and others recently added nearby, does not exist. Please only add nodes that you have verified on site. Thank you for helping keep OpenStreetMap accurate.
noahheffron (2026-07-21 17:42:31+00:00): This node, and others recently added nearby, does not exist. Please only add nodes that you have verified on site. Thank you for helping keep OpenStreetMap accurate.
noahheffron (2026-07-21 17:42:35+00:00): This node, and others recently added nearby, does not exist. Please only add nodes that you have verified on site. Thank you for helping keep OpenStreetMap accurate.
greatnameguys2472 (2026-07-21 18:50:19+00:00): Please reduce the size of your changeset areas so it doesn't span across the entire country. Also, why do some of the POIs you have edited have such a large number of revisions?
Jarek 🚲 (2026-07-21 20:13:38+00:00): I asked about the repeated edits to POIs (creating high revision numbers) in the bug tracker of the app being used: https://codeberg.org/comaps/comaps/issues/4828
CAM-Gerlach (2026-07-22 17:01:09+00:00): Thanks! I fixed up a couple of remaining issues (missing oneway:bicycle=no for bicycles, turn:lanes on Main St permitting now-invalid movements, etc) and made all the various other updates to cycleway/bicycle tagging, parking, stop signs, crossings, width and more for the western half of Eheart from Note 5397656 and the Blacksburg website linked in the above news article in changeset 186187073 (and did the eastern half in changeset 186189239)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5397656

https://osm.org/changeset/186187073

https://osm.org/changeset/186189239
felipeeugenio (2026-07-21 19:25:44+00:00): Hola. La adición de un footway como cruce es cuando los cruces son largos y se quiere expresar que un % grande del camino es bajo el régimen de un cruce, no es necesario hacerlo en cada cruce de caminos pequeños o pasajes.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186126580
MyBeautifulSunflower (2026-07-21 19:50:55+00:00): Lo tendré en cuenta!
mewhenthe (2026-07-21 16:55:31+00:00): Hello! The "Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta" imagery is very outdated is not recommended to map with, as the buildings you have added aren't there anymore.
Bing Maps Aerial, Esri World Imagery, and Mapbox Satellite are typically more up-to-date and should be used instead.
I have reverted your changes here.
sjorford (2026-07-22 12:45:07+00:00): You missed the new bypass roundabout - I've fixed it now, but please take extra care when modifying major roads
Daren20 (2026-07-24 13:03:27+00:00): ngl don’t tell me to take care when editing roads but okay?
felipeeugenio (2026-07-21 19:19:29+00:00): Hola. Estás borrando los nodos de cruces en la intersección para agregarlos como vía, lo que no está mal, pero luego agregas el nodo otra vez en un lugar que no intersecta con la calle. Por favor cuidado con ese tipo de ediciones.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186127979
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-22 07:16:28+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Please use future changeset comments to describe the actual edit and avoid insulting language. Thank you.
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-23 13:57:34+00:00): Woo!  looking good!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186128462
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-22 07:16:02+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Please use future changeset comments to describe the actual edit and avoid insulting language. Thank you.
eteb3 (2026-07-21 21:55:54+00:00): Resolved note #2786419
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-23 13:56:16+00:00): Oh dang, not sure how I missed that one, I ride past it regularly.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186128873
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-22 07:14:04+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the added name real?
dzamper (2026-07-22 15:28:26+00:00): To chyba access=private a nie access=no?
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-22 07:13:46+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the added name real?
b-holdet (2026-07-26 15:45:45+00:00): What is your source for the name?

I can't find anything named on the lake.
KronosTheLate (2026-07-27 06:50:19+00:00): I went to a local flea market which I learned about at this page: https://m.stsjoerup.dk/

There were no coordinates or anything available, but when I went to the booking site (https://sommerbybooking.dk/, link found on the previously linked page), there was a small map with this lake name on it. It seemed like a locally produced map, so I found it trustworthy.
pwbriggs (2026-07-22 06:21:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/misty870808: Please *stop* making changesets until you have responded to my question at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185881839#c1627905

If you are having technical difficulties doing that, please contact support@openstreetmap.org for assistance, and ask them to notify me (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/pwbriggs/) as well.

I have submitted a report to the site administrators regarding your potentially-suspicious editing behavior and lack of response to my multiple attempts to contact you.

Thanks!
Joel Koen (2026-07-22 05:58:01+00:00): Hello, please don't include the housenumber in the name tag. It only needs to be in `addr:housenumber`.
CapitalismFTW (2026-07-22 11:10:11+00:00): Hello, what should I put into the name tag? I did this so that houses and town houses could be identified on the base map. For example I use door dash, and it pulls from this map system. It is very convenient to have the house number on the map for reference. If I put the number only in the address box it simply shows a building not specifying what number it is. Appreciate any advice on how to label these properly.
Joel Koen (2026-07-22 11:14:41+00:00): The name tag should only be used if the house has a name.

If you have a look at the map on openstreetmap.org it will display a housenumber if it has no name. If you're using Door Dash to deliver and it doesn't show house numbers, that seems like a bug in their app.
CapitalismFTW (2026-07-22 11:20:45+00:00): It must be on their end. I was using it and it only showed the address if I had put information in the name box so I have been adding the address to the name box to get it to display. If you need me to I can stop adding the address to the name.
Joel Koen (2026-07-22 11:46:38+00:00): Yes, sorry but you do need to stop adding it as it's not the name of the house.

I would definitely raise this with Door Dash, most map styles will show house numbers when zoomed in, so they must have disabled it for some reason, which seems like a mistake.

Otherwise, I would suggest using CoMaps or OsmAnd to get house numbers. CoMaps is a bit simpler/nicer, but OsmAnd lets you sync the latest map changes every hour so you can immediately use your edits on your phone. :)
CapitalismFTW (2026-07-22 13:58:44+00:00): Ok I wont add the address number in the name field going forward. 
and perhaps it is an issue with door dash's version of the map, I can see the edits, ( I added a town home community that wasn't there before and a few weeks later I could see if tin my dasher app) but Door dash only shows a building if it has a name like El Gordo Bros Mexican Grill, but houses don't have addresses on them. It might be a choice for them to keep their map cleaner.
LordGarySugar (2026-07-23 02:21:46+00:00): Hi Julius, microsoft ai buildings are not suited very well for buildings in the UK - the majority of these are terraces and should be split into rows of terraced houses. If you enable OSMUK cadastral parcels it will highlight the property boundaries and show where the houses should be split. Thanks.
norgis (2026-07-21 18:59:22+00:00): FYI, service=parking_aisle is not supposed to be used on access roads to a parking lot as per the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=parking%20aisle

I have fixed this in your edit. Also, please leave Norwegian or English descriptions to changesets in Norway.
IpswichEdits (2026-07-21 18:54:16+00:00): Hi Monty Page-Hills. Nice work on this edit. You might just want to take a look at the BSP TEX building as there's currently a tag that says building:levels=factory . :-)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-22 19:59:36+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information. Furthermore, use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies--see https://osm.wiki/Google 

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186197819
QuiLe (2026-07-23 21:23:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in changeset 186138972. Please follow our tagging conventions and do not include promotional material in your edits.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186134259
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-27 14:17:07+00:00): Hi, thanks for these, they line up well and seem like good shapes. Just a note on the tagging. I think building=terrace should be kept for an (unsplit) terrace row and for individual houses, as you've done here, it should be building=house, house=terrace, which I've fixed these to
Trafford_Mapper (2026-07-27 14:32:13+00:00): Thank you for that feedback and update. Proceeding forward as I continue trying to draw in more, split buildings etc around my local area I'll be sure to tag terraced houses that way. 

The feedback is much appreciated to help me to map properly
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-27 14:47:57+00:00): Thanks, and I've just spotted my typo, it should be house=terraced
jplahti (2026-07-21 19:48:29+00:00): Mutta eivätkös nuo "pyörätiet" olleet jo merkitty tiehen tagilla cycleway=lane niin kuin pyöräkaistat kuuluu merkitä?
lankapuhelin (2026-07-27 01:53:21+00:00): Siltä minunkin silmiini näyttäisi. Kartoittaja on ollut muutoin äskettäin aktiivinen, niin voisikohan tämän muutoksen suoraan näillä tiedoilla perua?
NumberniaNorth149 (2026-07-21 19:28:23+00:00): I accidentally removed it :(
rajdhani (2026-07-22 09:40:16+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186167352
DaveF (2026-07-22 11:05:05+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10055803283

Merseyrail is a train operating company, not a network, 
I've previous;y added operator tags to all stations.

The tracks & stations are part of the National Rail network.

It's why this tag which you deleted exists & is valid. 
https://www.nationalrail.co.uk/stations/bkq/
Maik Ferri (2026-07-21 19:38:50+00:00): Será que as pessoas vão realmente usar isso?
thopf (2026-07-22 21:54:04+00:00): Hallo! Der Radweg dort ist gerade Baustelle, da die Bahnbrücke über die Herrgottwiesgasse  und über den Radweg ein neues Tragwerk erhält. Daher bitte belassen, Danke! LG.

https://www.graz.at/cms/beitrag/10028253/7755789/Baustellen_in_Graz.html

https://infrastruktur.oebb.at/de/informationen-und-mehr/baustellen-und-anrainer-information/baumassnahmen-steiermark~grazhbf-ostbf~
maplemoths (2026-07-28 14:24:21+00:00): oops i didn't mean to make that changeset so big
Tomas Straupis (2026-07-21 20:17:21+00:00): Chrm. Bet toks adresas „Kėdainių g. 8“ neegzistuoja. Šitas pastatas yra Pranciškonų g. 1
Burtininkai (2026-07-21 20:59:47+00:00): Labas, ir taip ir ne, ten yra atskiras įėjimas ir kadangi pastatų ansambilis yra didžiulis, tai neužtenka vien Pranciškonų 1.
Burtininkai (2026-07-21 21:01:30+00:00): Bet sutinku, oficialiai tokio adreso nera.
Tomas Straupis (2026-07-22 05:45:51+00:00): Automatinis adresų tikrinimas iš karto tokį adresą pažymi kaip klaidingą, na ir žmonės niekur neras tokio adreso informacijos, tai... atkeičiau į Pranciškonų 1 (kad pirmą kartą reikia pagrybauti aplink - žinau iš savo patirties).
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-30 07:32:28+00:00): According to the existing tags, this restaurant was destroyed by fire on December 12 of last year. Has it now been repaired and reopened?
O1S (2026-07-30 12:33:00+00:00): I believe somewhat (https://www.tmj4.com/news/local-news/in-your-community/waukesha-county/we-missed-this-place-crowds-return-to-bass-bay-months-after-fire-destroyed-brewhouse)

I believe the only change here was to the parking lot, though.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-30 22:16:09+00:00): The only change here was to add back amenity=restaurant to the POI node, which was correct--there isn't any change to a parking lot, at least in this changeset.

Just a tip--I _highly_ recommend installing the better [Better-OSM-Org](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Better-osm-org) script in your browser, as it makes the default OSM changeset view (and many other things on OSM.org) vastly more useful and easier to use. You can also use OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186137623 or another changeset viewer (Better-OSM-Org automatically adds OSMCha links to changesets, as well as a menu to open them in other tools).
DressyPear4 (2026-07-21 22:10:43+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186143170
DressyPear4 (2026-07-21 22:10:42+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186143170
DressyPear4 (2026-07-21 22:10:41+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186143170
DressyPear4 (2026-07-21 22:10:40+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186143170
eggie (2026-07-21 20:37:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
mateusz21osm (2026-07-21 21:15:55+00:00): pomyłkowo użyłem tagu addr:street zamiast addr:place w wielu miejscach w tym zestawie zmian. Wkrótce to poprawię.
yelisey90 (2026-07-21 21:33:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1533713641
If the road is used to get inside the parking lot, it's not service=parking_aisle . Please read the wiki page and fix this
Elizen (2026-07-23 07:28:44+00:00): Hello. I still think that it is a service=parking_aisle. This road is not used for through traffic, and there is a dead end at the end of the road. Parking is small and the road is used exclusively for access to parking spaces.

"A parking aisle is a service road that passes between rows of parking spaces (amenity=parking_space) in a parking lot or parking garage (amenity=parking or possibly amenity=motorcycle_parking), providing direct access for a motorized vehicle to enter and leave a parking space. It is generally not used for through traffic."
balint36 (2026-07-23 18:23:55+00:00): Szia! Úgy tűnik, hogy az átjáró mégis el van csúszva. A helyét mi alapján lőtted be?
leobass (2026-07-27 08:29:45+00:00): взяли и просто ликвидировали дом?

откатите
caprieldeluca (2026-07-23 11:43:02+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa!

Revisé los cambios. Podés revisar las directrices para mapeo de establecimientos educativos: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina/Educaci%C3%B3n

No usamos "N°" antes del número, ni abreviamos nombres por iniciales, como "A. Ocampo", los ponemos completos.

No duplicar el nombre de la escuela, estando mapeado el nodo como amenity=school, el nombre debería ir en el nodo.

El nodo tiene level=2, significando que la escuela está en el segundo piso.

Por cualquier consulta o aclaración, podés contactar a la comunidad OpenStreetMap Argentina: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto
MassCartog (2026-07-21 23:48:24+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM, Thanks for your edit, but unfortunately it seems like you dragged a ton of nodes all over the place unintentionally and then committed the changes. It was a mess, so your whole change set was reverted. 

You are welcome to try to add the Flock camera again, but be careful not to move any other objects, and if you do, undo or do not commit the change until its fixed. Thanks
eggie (2026-07-22 08:13:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
martinst (2026-07-22 20:46:52+00:00): Hallo kressmannn,
Du hast in letzter Zeit bei vielen Pfaden mtb_scale=* gelöscht sowie bicycle=no hinzugefügt.
bicycle=no sollte nur dort eingetragen werden, Wege eindeutig so beschildert sind.
Hier nur einige Beispiele:
Way 27847427: Wieso hast Du hier mtb_scale entfernt?
Way 802103278: Hier gibt es kein Verbotsschild, aber bicycle=no und mtb_scale wurde entfernt. Wieso?
Negreheb (2026-07-31 06:20:28+00:00): Hallo kressmannn, es gibt eine Thread dazu, vielleicht beteiligst du dich da https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/fragwurdige-loschungen-von-mtb-scale-und-eintragungen-von-bicycle-no/145946

Ich schreib dir noch eine PN, da CS-Kommentare meiner Erfahrung nach gern unter gehen :)
Jk488 (2026-07-22 11:49:09+00:00): Hi, please leave comments in English or Georgian so other local editors can understand your changes
Vodevil_Mark (2026-07-22 12:01:02+00:00): На сколько я знаю в Грузинском сообществе OSM три языка и русский преобладает. Я турист, я не делаю много правок. Тем более это не какие-то масштабные изменения
Jk488 (2026-07-22 15:18:03+00:00): ?
I don't speak Russian
LordGarySugar (2026-07-21 22:45:48+00:00): Hi, I have reverted this changeset as you have added duplicate/incorrect nodes. You added a subway station node on top of a an existing bus stop, and house 'A39' within the existing number 39 Burrows Road. You also added a tourist apartment with name=Airbnb, you should only map Airbnbs if they are signposted from the street and add the actual name, not just 'Airbnb'. Thanks, if you have any questions about this I would be happy to answer them.
aTarom (2026-07-22 18:06:55+00:00): Hola, una pregunta please, el cambio en la numeración de los apoyos eléctricos es sobre el terreno?
Un usuario me mezcló lineas de MT con AT y quizás te ha confundido, lo tengo pendiente de revisar desde hace 5 años que mezcló las tensiones y si ya lo has revisado tú, trabajo de campo que me ahorro :D
Sañudos
ivanruiz (2026-07-28 15:34:02+00:00): Buenas,
Básicamente me salió como advertencia en el validador de JOSM como que la numeración estaba desordenada e intenté corregirlo siguiendo la lógica del resto pero no se si está bien ya que no he podido comprobarlo in situ.
Un saludo.
flohoff (2026-07-22 06:12:01+00:00): Ich bin mir nicht sicher ob wir die namen der Projektentwickler überall so taggen sollten als seien das offizielle namen. Das ist ja hier wie auch im Kaiserquartier nicht der fall.

Das sind ja ursprünglich die internen namen der Projektentwickler.

Bei der Stadt hat das Kaiserquartier "Wellerdiek Areal" geheissen. 

Flo
stirps (2026-07-22 07:57:44+00:00): Sowohl in den Lokalmedien als auch in Unterlagen der Stadt wurden die Areale so bezeichnet und sind auch mMn so in der Bevölkerung bekannt. Falls es noch andere Namen gibt ließen die sich doch auch unter alt_name eintragen?
flohoff (2026-07-23 06:46:12+00:00): Das Problem ist so ein bisschen das gerne so irgendwelche Namen in die Datenbank geschwemmt werden die da eigentlich nichts verloren haben.

Es gab mal epische Diskussionen zu Flurnamen die einige eintragen wollte. Da hat sich die community ingesamt gewehrt. Das hat in OSM nichts verloren. 

Und genauso ist das für mich mit namen von Projektentwicklern. 

Das tragen wir in die Datenbank und das schimmelt dann da 20 Jahre rum - In Bielefeld hat jemand alte Höfe so eingetragen. Guck dir mal teilweise die geocoding resultate in Bielefeld an. Das ist halt totaler quatsch.

U.a. ist laut Geocoder jetzt auch der Schenke im Bahnhof im Kaiserquartier - Das sind halt die effekte wenn man so krams einträgt - das muss man sich gut überlegen.

Flo