piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 13:31:31+00:00): This is almost correct. You correctly placed a node at the centre of a settlement. I would considet this a hamlet and not a village.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168397913
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 14:09:39+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. You correctly identified a settlement here and I agree that is it can be mapped as a hamlet. There should be a central point tagged as place=hamlet; the area should be tagges as landuse=residential. Take care to ensure that buildings are enveloped by the residential area. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168397984
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 14:55:41+00:00): Place tag looks correctly mapped but the area should be tagged as landuse=residential. See my project comment.
klik (2025-09-10 07:13:07+00:00): Hallo Sebastian,
Du hast lobenswerterweise eine große Zahl von Hydranten eingetragen, Danke dafür.

Mir ist im Rahmen meiner Qualitätskontrolle aufgefallen, dass alle Deine Hydranten mit "water_source=groundwater" eingetragen sind. Das halte ich für unrealistisch. Üblicheeweise sind Unterflurhydranten vom öffentlichen Leitungsnetz versorgt. Das würde dann als "water_source=main" getaggt.
Vielleicht magst Du dir fie Hydranten bei Dir noch mal dahingehend anschauen.

Ansonsten weiter so, Hydranten sind wichtig.

Gruß
klik
NeisBot (2025-07-02 15:16:40+00:00): Hi Laaauraaa, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added residential landuse areas and supporting infrastructure"

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
NeisBot (2025-07-02 13:15:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-05 19:39:42+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/168536755
Gregory Peony (2025-08-09 01:12:14+00:00): There are too many settlements added in close proximity here than are justifed by the imagery sources used to map them. Sometimes seperate settlements can be close to one another, but usually if someone could walk form one to another in a few minutes then they're likely part of the same settlement. I deleted the excess settlements here. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168398412
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 17:58:04+00:00): An improvement over the previously crude geometry and an appropriate tag change. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168398423
bxl-forever (2025-07-03 16:31:26+00:00): source=Google Maps, really?

Please do not use Gmaps as a source for your OpenStreetMap edits, this is not allowed.
limes11 (2025-07-02 19:38:41+00:00): Hallo, 

das ergibt so nicht so viel Sinn, da 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27308001

bereits ein hw=track ist, auf dem nur landw. Verkehr fahren darf. Daher kann dies kein normaler Zufahrtsweg zum Grillplatz sein.

Oder gibt es hier Änderungen an der Beschilderung ?

Viele Grüße
konjak (2025-07-03 05:04:44+00:00): Hallo
Der Weg wird als Zufahrt zum Grillplatz benutzt. 
Die Beschilderung ist mir nicht bekannt.
Werde gelegentlich noch mal nachsehen.
Viele Grüße
limes11 (2025-07-14 18:30:32+00:00): Die Beschilderung sagt "Landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei", aber der Mietvertrag des Grillplatzes erlaubt die Nutzung zum Be- und Entladen. Daher motor_vehicle=destination gesetzt.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-03 10:09:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149973199 confirms
Aya Samir (2025-07-02 13:45:54+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar satellite imagery via MGP Pro 2025-07-02
Frans S (2025-07-04 14:40:44+00:00): Hello.  Thanks for the mapping.

I'm afraid you misinterpreted the instructions.

You map an area and tag it as place=village or place=hamlet.

The idea is that you tag the mapped area as landuse=residential and add a separate node and tag it as place=village or place=hamlet.
Check the instructions please.
PLease don't add a generic name.

I have modified it.

Kind regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2025-07-04 12:53:43+00:00): Hello.  Thanks for the mapping.

I'm afraid you misinterpreted the instructions.

You map an area and tag it as place=village or place=hamlet.

The idea is that you tag the mapped area as landuse=residential and add a separate node and tag it as place=village or place=hamlet.
Check the instructions please.
Btw. less than 15 buildings ought to be tagged as 'hamlet '


I have modified it.

Kind regards and keep mapping
joost schouppe (2025-07-28 08:14:57+00:00): Hi François,
I've market the veterinaire as a veterinaire instead of as a hospitel :)
user_5359 (2025-07-02 19:11:36+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/12564631319. You move this node more than 100 meters. Please check the position.
NeisBot (2025-07-02 15:16:51+00:00): Hi JEROME Olivi, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added a new hamlet by creating a way and associated nodes, tagging it with place=hamlet."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
Frans S (2025-07-03 15:21:40+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
The area where a group of buildings is situated need to be surrounded by an area, tagged landuse=residential.
See the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2025-07-04 13:34:42+00:00): Hello.  Thanks for the mapping.

I'm afraid you misinterpreted the instructions.

You map an area and tag it as place=village or place=hamlet.

The idea is that you tag the mapped area as landuse=residential and add a separate node and tag it as place=village or place=hamlet.
Check the instructions please.

I have modified it.

Kind regards and keep mapping
Midmere (2025-07-04 12:42:49+00:00): Nie, to nie jest parking. Miejsce postoju samochodu w lesie może być uznane za parking, ale tylko wtedy, gdy jest to miejsce do tego przeznaczone i odpowiednio oznakowane, np. znakiem D-18. A tam takiego znaku nie ma.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-04 15:27:24+00:00): Osm jest mniej restrykcyjne, jak to jest miejsce do parkowania pojazdów to jest to przeguby
Frans S (2025-07-04 13:15:38+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A single building is not to be mapped.
Please check the instructions.
I adjusted it.
Best regards and keep mapping
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 14:20:42+00:00): Looks like 2 tasks were overlapping in seperate projects here. If you see that something is already mapped then modify the existing data. Thanks for trynig to accurately map the area, but it was tagged incorrectly and should instead be landuse=residential.
Frans S (2025-07-04 13:03:55+00:00): Hello.  Thanks for the mapping.

I'm afraid you misinterpreted the instructions.

You map an area and tag it as place=village or place=hamlet.

The idea is that you tag the mapped area as landuse=residential and add a separate node and tag it as place=village or place=hamlet.
Check the instructions please.

I have modified it.

Kind regards and keep mapping
bxl-forever (2025-07-02 22:09:24+00:00): Hello, MCRonse,

Your fellow mappers would be happier if you could please type correct changeset descriptions when you upload data to OSM, so that we could understand what you tried to change here.

Naming most of your changesets "Add" unfortunately provide no useful information.  Or just one word with the town name does not either.

You might be interested to read this page on the OSM Wiki, which explains why we care about this.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks in advance, and have a nice day.
user_5359 (2025-07-03 12:40:40+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1411344234. What is the mean of the tag Thursday = (17th/7/2025)
?
Erick tamba (2025-07-04 21:36:48+00:00): Thank you for highlighting that! , i have deleted that tag! looks like a copy and paste error
bxl-forever (2025-07-02 15:06:01+00:00): ## REVERTED CHANGESET

Your changeset has been erased.

You created a duplicate of this node.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12912466094

Please avoid editing OSM with "Organic Maps".  Tthis app shows incomplete and outdated data.
Rond-eux (2025-07-02 18:06:57+00:00): Merci et excuses. Which Android editing app can/should I use then to edit on the go?
bxl-forever (2025-07-02 18:37:05+00:00): You may try EveryDoor or StreetComplete.  They are able to download live data when you are on the go.  This will be safer.

(That being said, the maps on Organic Maps look really beautiful, this is probably the most pleasant tool to *view* OSM maps.)
VictorIE (2025-10-30 15:48:48+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/631346180/

Is all of this Liffey Meats?

The 'Esri World Imagery' photos are form 2023 and show some demolition and new buildings adjacent to this site.
Duck_Dur (2025-10-30 16:15:35+00:00): Hello VictorIE,

No, this was apart of the old mill complex due for redevelopment. As you previously said, this was all demolished in 2023-25. There are bits of it still around and actively occupied like the Charity Shop and a car mechanics and a haulage company.

Besides that, have no clue who the current owner of this land is, but if I have to guess, either Liffey Meats or some developer of some degree.

Regards,
Norbert Dichter (2025-07-03 14:22:39+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution, but you mapped an area as building.

There are round huts to map, instead and more to look for.

Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168401918
eggie (2025-07-02 14:39:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Dan is access=no algemeen voldoende en kunnen die andere accesstags weer weg.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-07-02 14:48:14+00:00): Dag WJ
Dit zou correct kunnen zijn als Verboden Toegang aangegeven zou zijn of als de weg is afgesloten met een barrier=gate
Zou je kunnen taggen op een node. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-07-02 14:46:47+00:00): Svp niet de wegen verwijderen.. Gewoon access=no bijtaggen
Een weg is geen barrier
gr eggie
eggie (2025-07-02 14:44:58+00:00): track hersteld
eggie (2025-07-02 14:42:46+00:00): Dag WJ van der Meer  Een weg is geen barrier=yes  Je hebt nu de highwaytag verwijderd.
Een barrier is bv een hek barrier=gate. Die kun je verbonden met de weg op een node bijtaggen. evt met access=no
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-07-02 14:43:50+00:00): highwaytag hersteld
epigen108 (2026-02-14 22:49:13+00:00): Hallo @HeiKue, ich war heute bei der Überflutungsfläche des nördlichen Dambachs. Aus dem Geländerelief hätte ich das nördliche Ende des Damms weiter südlich angesetzt, vgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5167783 . Was war dein Kriterium, weswegen du den Damm weiter fortgeführt hast?
HeiKue (2026-02-15 19:39:47+00:00): Hallo, ich war vor Ort mit GPS, aber es war Sommer, keine Orientierungspunkte und ggf. hatte ich Empfangsprobleme. Wenn Du jetzt im Winter genauere Daten hast ...
Gregory Peony (2025-07-26 01:05:12+00:00): A valid footprint but it should have been squared. After mapping buildings, please remember to square their corners. Most buildings have square corners because that's easy to build. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that the corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, use the `Q` key to square the corners. This [video about squaring features](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a guide.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168402600
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 00:40:52+00:00): The buildings you added here are likley temporal yurts and should not be mapped as they will likely not be there for long. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168402655
Gregory Peony (2025-07-27 03:49:31+00:00): Generally you have identified buildings in the imagery but have not appropriately squared them. After mapping buildings, please remember to square their corners. Most buildings have square corners because that's easy to build. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that the corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, use the `Q` key to square the corners. This [video about squaring features](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a guide. The footprint I flagged envelopes two buildings.
Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168402687
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 16:05:08+00:00): The footprints I flagged are likely temporal yurts and should not have been mapped. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168402696
Gregory Peony (2025-07-27 02:55:42+00:00): Hi you identified buildings in the imagery here but they are square; not round. Round buildings cast a rounded shadow not straight lines. See how I mapped them here https://osmcha.org/changesets/169536083 Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168402706
Gregory Peony (2025-07-27 03:09:56+00:00): You maped valid and accurate footprints here. The NE footprint would have been more accurate if it were slightly smaller. The SW one is pretty much mapped as well as the imagery allows. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168402707
Gregory Peony (2025-07-11 22:30:50+00:00): Looks like you're generally identifying buildings in the imagery and you improved some of the footpritns here, however some are inaccurate. for example the one in the SE. I previously improved the accuracy of this footprint but the one you replaced it with is oversized.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168402713
Gregory Peony (2025-07-27 02:39:19+00:00): Hi, you did a good job differentiating between round and square buildings here. Some of the footprints could be smaller. Keep in mind that you are looking at the roofs of buildings, but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+). The square footprints should have been squared with q. I flagged one footprint which likely represents temporal yurts and should not be mapped, because it won't be there for long; I deleted it. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168402731
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 16:39:01+00:00): I think the northern footprint envelopes multiple buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168402761
Gregory Peony (2025-07-15 03:54:56+00:00): This is likely a temporal yurt and should not be mapped. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168402802
Gregory Peony (2025-07-11 20:54:50+00:00): You correctly identified round buildings from the correct imagery source, however they are generally oversized. Please see my project comments to see how to scale features to make them an accurate size.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168402809
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 16:27:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! These footprints do represent buildings in the imagery but they could be more accurate. Remember to square footprtins when appropriate. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168402844
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 16:26:15+00:00): These footprints could be more accurate. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168402847
Gregory Peony (2025-07-25 21:19:19+00:00): Hi, the building you mapped here represents one in the imagery and is appropriately squared. It is however slightly overzised. Accurate footprints aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168402859
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 15:07:48+00:00): You idenitifed square buildings in the imagery but their footprints could be more accurate. Please read my project comments.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168402930
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 17:49:09+00:00): Valid footprints but the imagery allows for them to be more accurate. Pease remember to square them with q. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168402958
Gregory Peony (2025-07-15 03:53:29+00:00): The footprints I didn't flag are valid and accurate circular footprints. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168402969
Gregory Peony (2025-07-11 21:38:39+00:00): You correctly identified buildings in the imagery but they are generally slightly oversized. Roofs that you see in aerial imagery tend to overhang the walls of buildings somewhat.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403009
Gregory Peony (2025-07-11 21:59:42+00:00): You apear to have generally identified buildings in imagery but you have not mapped them accurately. Please focus on making quality contributions that others can build upon. You generaed shared nodes between a building and highway hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to exisitng data. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403013
Gregory Peony (2025-07-14 23:33:35+00:00): You aligned these footprints to bing; the instructions state to align data to ESRI. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403028