piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kengaroo5445 (2024-07-23 03:30:47+00:00): Thanks for mapping. Remember to square the corners of all your buildings. This can be done using the Q key. Hope you map again soon.!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154236438
Tatti Barletta (2024-07-22 07:01:10+00:00): -?
Francesco Zanaboni (2024-07-22 14:51:13+00:00): Ciao!
Potresti per favore limitare l'area delle tue modifiche (facendole a gruppi di modifiche ravvicinate) e soprattutto inserire dei commenti descrittivi, anche solo a grandi linee?

Fai riferimento a questi articoli della wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
eggie (2024-07-22 05:56:55+00:00): Dag mx  Svp geen gebouwen op grond van schuingenomen luchtfoto's gaan aanpassen. Dus niet naar de daken kijken. Daar staat het gebouw niet.
Alle gebouwen zijn ingemeten import vanuit het Kadaster.
Ik zal de gebouwen herstellen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-07-22 06:04:53+00:00): warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway
  	1
Gebouw opnieuw uitgelijnd en bovenstaande foutmelding opgelost.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=154236640

MVG
eggie
felipeeugenio (2024-07-21 20:59:13+00:00): 4342664	Lenny Andreu	2024-07-20 22:44	opened	Carteles anuncian Lord Cochrane en lugar de Almirante Cochrane #OsmAnd
4342662	Lenny Andreu	2024-07-20 22:44	opened	addr 195, Cochrane #OsmAnd
4342661	Lenny Andreu	2024-07-20 22:44	opened	cabañas renacer #OsmAnd
4342660	Lenny Andreu	2024-07-20 22:44	opened	addr 507 #OsmAnd
4342659	Lenny Andreu	2024-07-20 22:44	opened	addr 520 #OsmAnd
4342229	Lenny Andreu	2024-07-20 17:09	opened	Cartel indica: Diego de la Rivera #OsmAnd
4342228	Lenny Andreu	2024-07-20 17:09	opened	addr 221 Diego de rivera #OsmAnd
4342227	Lenny Andreu	2024-07-20 17:09	opened	addr 139, Danilo Vicencio #OsmAnd
4342226	Lenny Andreu	2024-07-20 17:09	opened	addr 141 #OsmAnd
4342224	Lenny Andreu	2024-07-20 17:09	opened	addr 142 #OsmAnd
4342223	Lenny Andreu	2024-07-20 17:09	opened	add 143 #OsmAnd
4342222	Lenny Andreu	2024-07-20 17:09	opened	addr 145 #OsmAnd
4342221	Lenny Andreu	2024-07-20 17:09	opened	addr 144 #OsmAnd
limes11 (2024-07-21 22:40:55+00:00): Hi, 

do you know whether these speed limits are permanent ?

With your update, the tags

maxspeed=80
maxspeed:conditional=80 @ (2019 Oct-2024 Dec)

do not really make sense.

Cheers
BluePixel4k (2024-07-22 10:58:26+00:00): Hi,

oh, I agree with you, that doesn't make sense.
I overlooked the "maxspeed:conditional". So this is the way for non-permanent speed limits? Because my navigator (Magic Earth) doesn't use this as a speed limit. Maybe because the condition is missing?

Thank you!
limes11 (2024-07-22 15:04:59+00:00): Not all routers support the established :conditional syntax.

To be fair, a conditional speed limit for 5 years is silly, one should have simply put maxspeed=80 back in 2019. But since December 24 is slowly approaching, I would now keep it and put the maxspeed-values back.
BluePixel4k (2024-07-24 07:16:09+00:00): My navigation app supports the syntax, but it looks like a time is mandatory for it.

That's true... 😅
Okay fine, did you already put back the values or should I revert the changeset?
limes11 (2024-07-24 19:48:31+00:00): Ich habe es revertiert. Viele Grüße
BluePixel4k (2024-08-02 16:12:40+00:00): Danke!
Kann man dies in der GUI von OSM eigentlich beim Changeset sehen, dass es revertiert wurde? Finde die GUI zum Teil nicht so intuitiv 🤔
limes11 (2024-08-02 17:20:54+00:00): Am CS nicht nein. Das kann die API nicht verarbeiten und es wäre auch bei Teilreverts nicht möglich, ob ein solcher Flag gesetzt werden müsste.

An meinem CS ist erkennbar, dass ich ein Reverter-Tool verwendet hat. Zusammen mit den Kommentaren und der Historie der Objekte wird es dann klar.
VictorIE (2024-07-23 08:36:57+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1302940285/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1303031722/history

Not sure about the names. :D
trial (2024-09-01 15:42:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1302940987/history
On est d'accord, un source:name:br sans name ou name:br n'a pas de sens ?
kmpoppe (2024-07-28 20:10:00+00:00): Hi Luke,

you've changed Specsavers to contain the new address, but haven't moved the node, even though 22 James Street is a different building.

Could you fix this?

K
Dodko (2024-07-27 08:57:36+00:00): Schválili poslanci VZN o pomenovaní ulíc? Na webe obce som nič nenašiel.
xalex55 (2024-07-31 16:30:18+00:00): Pozdravujem. 
Teší ma nadviazenie tohto kontaktu. 
V komentári položená otázka je plne dôvodná:
1) Obec Gemerská Hôrka zatiaľ nemá (oficiálne) určené názvy ulíc a iných verejných priestranstiev, hoci sa jedná o zákonnú povinnosť obce.
2) Poslanci OZ predmetné VZN pravdepodobne schvália až v septembri alebo oktobri tohto roka, a to na aj základe tých názvov, ktoré som uviedol na mape. 
3) Uvedomujem si pritom, že postup by mal byť opačný: najprv VZN a potom uvedenie (oficiálneho) názvu ulice na tejto alebo inej mape.
4) Termín „oficiálny názov“ zdôrazňujem preto, lebo sa už niekoľko desaťročí venujem problematike geografických názvov na území Gemerskej Hôrky, pôvodne nazývanej Malach a Ozorany. Tieto názvy od 13. storočia viem dokladovať, zozbieral som ich vyše 200, slovanského, maďarského alebo slovenského jazykového pôvodu. Mnohé z nich pritom padli do zabudnutia, čo je normálne. Iné zas nahradili nové názvy, medzi nimi aj také „nezmyselné“ názvy, ktoré nemajú žiadne historické opodstatnenie. Tieto ktosi vymyslel a následne sa „oficializovali“ tým, že sa objavili na všelijakých mapách, pričom ich nikto neschválil, k tomuto pozri: „Vyvieračka Forrás“ alebo „Vyvieračka pivničná diera“ na tejto mape. 
5) Čo sa týka názvov ulíc, ako som uviedol, obec ich nemá určené. Tie, ktoré sa bežne používali na prelome19/20. storočia a sú zaznamenané v cirkevných matrikách, obec po roku 1920 neaktulizovala. Stane sa to až teraz, pokiaľ poslanci predmetné VZN schvália. 
6) Vec je aktuálna už aj preto, lebo v blízkej budúcnosti obec plánuje obnoviť takmer všetky miestne komunikácie, ktoré za týmto účelom musí pasportorizovať.  Ak poznáte niekoho, kto dobre a rÿchlo vie spraviť, nápad privítam (ponuku od T-Mapy už máme), 
Ešte raz: som nesmierne rád, že Vy  – ako odborník – ste zareagovali na môj test uviesť názvy ulíc na vašej skvelej mape.
Na záver moje osobné údaje:
PhDr. Alexander Ambrus
Funkcia: poslanec a zástupca starostu obce Gemerská Hôrka
e-mail: xalex.ambrus@gmail.com
Tel: (+421) 940-146-500
Dodko (2024-08-09 09:42:22+00:00): S aktualizáciou mapy treba počkať kým bude VZN, potom napíšte a doplním názvy ulíc.
Adresy sa budú dať aktualizovať až keď obec zapíše orientačné čísla do registra adries.
emersonveenstra (2024-07-24 12:30:12+00:00): Hi there,

In OSM, we prefer not to abbreviate things, could you please expand "Tr" to "Trail"?

Also, are the numbers in front of the trail name some sort of reference numbers? If so, they should probably go in the ref tag, not the name tag
jtrull (2024-07-24 14:31:00+00:00): I wasn't aware of that naming convention. I can change these. The numbers are part of the trail name, and on many published maps these are referred to be number only. Do you still think it should be moved to ref?
mapping_places (2024-07-21 22:53:52+00:00): De acuerdo a esta página de wikidata, los numeros de las carrteras estatales son asignados de acuerdo a un índice que se toma de un documento de SCT, sin embargo considero que se extrajo el valor de se indica como un indicador del número de la vía, y eso podría no ser correcto. Por ejemplo, el tramo de carretera estatal Km. 47.0 (La puerta, sultepect) vuelta del agua- zacualpan se identifica en el wikidata como 96, sin emabrgo si vemos la información del mapa desde el sitio oficial de INEGI, dicha carretera corresponde a la ruta Número 92, así mismo en un documento (de la Junta local de caminos EDMOEX) donde se mencionan trabajos de mantenimiento en  ese mismo tramo, se identifica como 92 también. por lo que considero que ese Documento tomó el número consecutivo de renglón, como número de ruta, y debería ser corregido.
Evidencia aquí: https://jcem.edomex.gob.mx/sites/jcem.edomex.gob.mx/files/files/RED%20CARRETERA%20JUNIO-2015.pdf y aquí: https://gaia.inegi.org.mx/mdm6/?s=MTM4ODk3MTk=
Enock4seth (2024-08-14 14:53:26+00:00): Hi EkowYaw, thank you for trying to fix the route ref, unfortunately you changed the values of route relation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route . If a way is part of multiple routes and you can specify both refs using semi-colon as the separator see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475152362#map=15/5.4144/-0.794

This  changeset and following ones have changed the route ref from IR6 to IR8 and then to N10 including other tags, however this relation is IR6, I will proceed restore the correct details.  Happy mapping!
JayTurnr (2024-07-21 23:47:10+00:00): Amenity extracted was https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5410382262#map=19/53.20067/-0.53729 but I guess I didn't move it
Baloo Uriza (2024-07-22 12:15:04+00:00): Some changeset comments would be appreciated.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154240462
RespToo (2024-07-23 23:39:20+00:00): You know I'm doing this for free, right?
Baloo Uriza (2024-07-24 01:12:07+00:00): So am I, it's basically the default.
rivermont (2024-07-23 02:27:39+00:00): Why did you change w18905145 to residential? It is actually literally a service road, providing one lane of traffic solely for the post office.
Joseph R P (2024-07-23 04:07:28+00:00): Linney Street is a public street, not solely for the post office, based on what I can tell from its signage. There isn't any sort of 'no thru traffic' sign at its beginning and with the Bing street imagery the iD editor provides, I think I can make out an 'adopt a highway' sign (which I don't believe would be posted along a private service driveway) and some kind of red-on-white text sign that's most likely a private parking sign. However, Bing's street view imagery is horrible and I could be wrong.
rivermont (2024-07-23 13:13:11+00:00): I was parked on Linney St yesterday. The only thing accessible from it is the PO. I'm not sure what the rest of that means; highway=service does not require private access.
Joseph R P (2024-07-23 15:19:29+00:00): It is still a public through street. There are plenty of streets that exist with a single or no property along them, and that doesn't make them service roads. By 'private' I mean a private-owned roadway intended for customers, employees, residents, etc. to access a building where usage as a public street may be limited or restricted, which Linney Street is not in this case. It can be used as a street to access another street. 

Another tag that can be used to imply this is just a narrow public street with a service road-like function is highway=service with service=alley. Alleys are more often publicly-accessible than typical highway=service ways.
rivermont (2024-07-23 16:52:39+00:00): Well if all public streets are residential roads, then I suppose Linney St can be a residential road.
martianfreeloader (2024-11-26 21:04:18+00:00): Hey,

I've reverted this edit.

If there is a single-carriageway in reality, then we map it as such in OSM. 
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway

If access varies by direction, then we use directional keys (like motor_vehicle:forward).
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Forward_%26_backward,_left_%26_right

A lot of public transport routes go along here. When we make changes to the map, we need to be sure not to break these routes. To this end, we use appropriate access keys like psv=yes.
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Public_service_vehicles

OSM is made for everybody and people use it in many many different ways. When we make edits to the map, we can't tune/hack it to our personal specific needs in a way that renders it unusable to others.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-22 23:50:59+00:00): Whats the source for  https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17862912 ?
Frans S (2024-07-22 12:27:31+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Mapped buildings are default Building=yes !

A: Inaccurate mapping.

E: Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154241144
VictorIE (2025-05-27 03:11:40+00:00): Hi,

I'm wondering if this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243463024 continues here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1389965645

Do you have any idea what it carries? Might it be a branch of the "New Multi-Product Pipeline"? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17537279
citrula (2024-07-22 02:46:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Please refrain from adding nonexistent, future, features.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154241321
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 01:57:03+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164747836
MarinoBM (2024-07-26 22:08:35+00:00): Hola Diegatus, gracias por colaborar en mejorar el mapa de OpenStreetMap.
No está admitido abreviar los nombres. Tampoco el de las calles. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas#Nombrado_de_v%C3%ADas
Mira cómo está hecho en otros sitios y trata de reponer los nombres originales.
Si tienes dudas puedes plantearlas en el grupo de OSM en Telegram.
https://t.me/osmcyl
Un saludo.
martien-176 (2024-07-22 09:06:01+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. 

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. 

Then check (again) if the outline of the squared building still matches the outline that you see on the imagery.

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
martien-176 (2024-07-22 09:06:35+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. 

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. 

Then check (again) if the outline of the squared building still matches the outline that you see on the imagery.

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154241530
martien-176 (2024-07-22 09:06:37+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. 

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. 

Then check (again) if the outline of the squared building still matches the outline that you see on the imagery.

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154241530
ndg032 (2024-07-23 02:50:58+00:00): Buena modificación, le recomiendo no cambiar las áreas de bosques naturales/gestionados por landcover trees, no llegan a ser visibles en el mapa, buenas noches.
AgusQui (2024-07-23 04:18:12+00:00): Que no sea visible en un render en particular no es motivo para no usar un tag. En la comunidad Argentina se decidió que natural=wood se usa para bosques naturales, mientras que para la cobertura de árboles en zonas urbanas se debe usar landcover=trees, ver las respectivas wiki y sus discusiones variadas en la comunidad no solo Argentina sino mundial.
Frans S (2024-07-31 12:48:30+00:00): Thank you for mapping. I reviewed various changesets from you.
You have correctly identified the location of most objects, well mapped and squared.

Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154241877
nevw (2024-07-22 04:26:08+00:00): Hi, I expect house are each at addr:housenumber=52 and additionally need a addr:unit=1 or 2 or 3
They also need addr:street=Beddoe Avenue I assume
Branko Kokanovic (2024-07-22 10:46:39+00:00): ako primetis brojeve na zgradi, kao npr. na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965307132, povezi ih na zgradu. Nije moranje, nego ako primetis
soliMM (2024-07-24 07:14:03+00:00): Pozdrav, 

Hvala na sugestiji, međutim nema potrebe jer sam dobro upoznat sa smjernicama za dodavanje adresa u Srbiji pošto sam do sad dodao nekoliko desetina hiljada istih. 

Naravno da sam primjetio i ovo, ali ostavljeno je s namjerom ovako kako jeste iz nekoliko razloga.

Prvo, ne znam da li je ovo jedan objekat kao što je ucrtano na OSM-u ili su zapravo dva objekta koja imaju zajednički zid. Ukoliko je ovo slučaj onda ona varijanta da se nodovi zakače sa spoljni way od zgrade pada u vodu, jer bi kućni brojevi trebali da budu stavljeni na oba objekta pojedinačno. 
Inače na snimcima može da se vidi veoma mala promjena u boji krova, negdje na sredini. Što može da nagovijesti da je su u pitanju dva objekta, mada i ne mora da znači. Ne možemo da znamo bez provjere na terenu.

Drugo, postoji node od pošte na sredini objekta kojoj je postavljen tag BB (bez broja). Da li možda neki od ovih brojeva ustvari pripada samoj pošti?

Treće, ako bi se stavljala adresa na spoljni way onda bi najlogičnije bilo da se stave tamo gdje je glavni ulaz u taj objekat. Pošto ne mogu sa sigurnošću da kažem sa koje strane se prilazi ovoj zgradi ostavio sam ovako. Na snimcima je djelovalo kao da im se pristupa sa lijeve strane pa bi nodovi sa adresama mogli da se stave na tu stranu (ako je ovo jedan objekat, a ne dva).

P.S. Ne znam da li si primjetio da addr:housenumber=бб na nodu od pošte nije ispravan, jer ako je slučaj da ovaj objekat pošte zaista nema kućni broj onda bi trebalo da se taguje na sledeći način nohousenumber=yes. Isto tako ako se ne varam, slovne oznake koje idu uz kućni broj stavljamo na latinici, a ne na ćirilici, zar ne?

U iščekivanju odgovora,
Miloš
Branko Kokanovic (2024-07-25 12:36:17+00:00): I dalje mislim da ima smisla da se stavi na way zgrade, cak iako ne znamo ni koliko zgrada ima ispod, ni gde su im ulazi, i ni to sto ima dodatni POI ne smeta. Inace ne bismo nikad attach-ovali nijednu adresu na terasastu zgradu ikada prilikom importa. Sto se tice poste, to ne diram (mada treba verovatno dodati `nohousenumber`)
smithkm (2024-07-26 20:38:05+00:00): Why did you mark North Park Street `access=no`
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-23 06:35:16+00:00): What "Streetview" did you use?
Peter Towers (2024-07-24 02:19:11+00:00): I used google maps & I clearly saw a small red fire hydrant.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-24 03:26:19+00:00): Thanks. How much of your mapping was done via Google Maps or Streetview?
Fizzie-DWG (2024-08-09 06:25:59+00:00): Reverted by DWG for use of improper source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155006651
DUGA (2025-01-05 17:39:46+00:00): Do you have any idea of what your team was doing here?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154244957#map=19/40.030709/-75.153877

You added a conditional restriction to a node, this node could be a part of the relation nearby, or could be not, how could others interpret?

Why don't you add that condition to the relation?
Глеб (2024-12-02 06:22:31+00:00): Вы о чём говорите??
Вы зачем удалили зимник?
flohoff (2024-07-22 11:48:11+00:00): Moin,
hier 2-3 kleine anmerkungen. 

Das erste - Das Gebäude ist nicht wirklich Rechtwinkelig - ist das richtig? 

Es gibt in den ganzen Editoren typischerweise Hilfsfunktionen mit denen man flächen Automatisch rechtwinkelig machen kann. Guck da mal nach wie das geht.

Das andere ist das ein "name" auf einem building das Gebäude so nennt. 

"Autoplatz" deutet auf einen Autohändler hin - Dann sollte da noch sowas wie "shop=car" drauf.

Bei OSM funktioniert die klassifikation was etwas ist nicht über den name - sondern über die tags.

So wie es jetzt getagged ist heisst das Gebäude "Autoplatz Verl" - Was ja wenn es die "Anker Villa" wäre richtig ist - aber hier wohl eher nicht.

Flo
flo2154 (2024-07-22 08:54:38+00:00): The street name changed from Robert-Bosch-Ring to Werner-von-Siemens-Ring a few months ago, see https://osm.org/note/4166009 and https://osm.org/changeset/150720157. So probably the street you were editing should also get the new name and the Mapillary imagery is outdated.
Katsiaryna_bus (2024-07-22 14:34:33+00:00): Hello, thank you for the feedback. Considering your comment that Mapillary is outdated, have returned this road to the previous condition.
flohoff (2024-07-22 11:44:53+00:00): Als Hinweis hier - Das waren "razed:buildings" - also schon was besonderes.

Wenn Gebäude abgerissen werden werden diese nicht gelöscht - Sondern die bekommen sog. "lifecycle" tags - D.h. die werden als abgerissen markiert damit nicht der nächste die von Luftbildern wieder einträgt.

Hier standen genau Gebäude - die sind mit lifecycle tags auf "razed" gesetzt worden.

Nur weil die dinge nicht in _deinen_ Luftbildern zu sehen sind heisst das nicht das es nicht doch da _ist_ oder _war_

Hier die ESRI Luftbilder:

https://silicon-verl.de/home/flo/tmp/20240722/Screenshot_from_2024-07-22_13-43-13.png

D.h. der nächste Mapper der die ESRI Luftbilder benutzt könnte geneigt sein die Gebäude wieder einzuzeichnen.

Flo
Anastasiya_Vakulich (2024-11-27 05:18:53+00:00): #mapbox_roads_attributes
marc__marc (2026-03-01 08:25:04+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12067503952
le préfixe du téléphone est invalide +32
mais je me demandais surtout si le numéro de la maison est bien 99 / 3
c'est pas 99.3 ? je n'ai jamais vu de numéro avec un /
Cordialement,
Marc
OSMDoudou (2026-03-01 13:54:01+00:00): Hello, Thanks for reporting. The notation with '/' is visible on websites mentioning the lawyers but I verified on the buildings and it's noted with'.', so I adapted that way.
eggie (2024-07-22 06:43:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Geim (2024-07-27 07:03:47+00:00): A.u.b. bij het toevoegen van de sidewalk tag aan de hoofdweg, rekening houden met de getekende paden die er al liggen.