piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2024-11-13 06:01:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159076867, 159076813, 159076848 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
eggie (2024-08-23 19:56:36+00:00): Dag Laurens.. Niet alles is een parkeerterrein. 
Kijk even hier hoe je die parkeervakken kunt mappen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side

Neem er svp de tijd voor ipv in een hoog tempo weer naar het volgende te gaan.

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2024-08-23 20:43:18+00:00): Dag Bes.. Lijkt me beter zo. Ik heb de infrastructuur wat aangepast aan de huidige situatie.
CTRL f5 voor het effect
MVG
eggie
Tomas Straupis (2024-08-26 09:28:11+00:00): Some of these do not exist for more than ten years. Are you sure you're using up to date VMU data? Have you checked it?
UrSuS (2024-08-26 09:32:15+00:00): Those were from 2020 data of VMU, there was just one that had marks that it doesn't exist. Others I believe were not new in OSM
Tomas Straupis (2024-08-26 09:46:18+00:00): Be careful, VMU publishes some questionable data, I've seen at least one point which does not exist anymore. And I've changed back tourism=picnic_table, Snaiperis has used correct tagging before.
UrSuS (2024-08-26 09:53:04+00:00): All tourism=picnic_table? I was checking photos VMU added, some sites have just picnic tables like this one
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/mapviewer/index.html?webmap=83e45ea188b24dbf926acd8aac768d4d
Tomas Straupis (2024-08-26 10:10:21+00:00): Yes, this is how we interpret tourism points in our apps. leisure=picnic_table is for micromapped subitems of other existing tourism object. So leisure=picnic_table is basically ignored.
UrSuS (2024-08-26 10:22:50+00:00): I agree on micromapped subitems if they are part of something bigger like picnic_site or camp_site, but if place itself is just picnic table, that's really strange. But ok, I will follow your interpretation
Tomas Straupis (2024-08-26 10:28:02+00:00): We want to mark that is is a place where you can stop and have a rest sitting by the table and eating a sandwitch :-)
mtmail (2024-08-25 19:24:48+00:00): Do you remember if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1310655962 is a oneway street (section)? Currently the tag is "yes=no". Based on the map I'd say yes. It came up on a validation tool (https://osm.janmichel.eu/taginfo/newkeys.htm)
joost schouppe (2024-08-26 07:38:23+00:00): Haha, sorry! Yes, I remember. It has recently been rebuilt and is oneway direction North. I unfortunately am not 100% sure what the southernmost point is that is one way, but definitely up to the Place de la République
mtmail (2024-08-26 10:16:17+00:00): I'm glad I asked. I see another mapper removed the 'yes=no' a couple of hours ago without replacement so that piece of information would've been lost. I made the edit now. Thanks a lot!
eggie (2024-08-23 20:09:13+00:00): Even als voorbeeld de parking aangepast zoals die er in werkelijkheid uitziet.
os-emmer (2024-08-23 19:11:17+00:00): The source tag of this changeset schould not be existing.
os-emmer (2024-08-23 19:11:14+00:00): The source tag of this changeset schould not be existing.
eggie (2024-08-23 20:04:24+00:00): warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway
  	1

Er loopt daar geen pad dwars door tuinen en gebouw.
nieuwlaurens (2024-08-28 17:48:03+00:00): excuses, dit was voor het achterpad wat naar deze woonlocatie loopt.. dat bestaat wel.
eggie (2024-08-28 18:21:34+00:00): Oke .. maar je pad liep door het gebouw.
warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway
1

Een achterpad kun je intekenen als highway=footway met een extra tag footway=alley ( Dus brandgang) 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dalley

Mapse,
eggie
eggie (2024-08-28 18:30:26+00:00): Ik heb je pad teruggelegd.. Zelf maar even kijken hoe het precies hoort te lopen.
gr eggie
eggie (2024-08-23 19:53:35+00:00): Een highway unclassified komt niet logisch  over hier.
Ik zie geen voetpaden die je hebt toegevoegd
eggie (2024-08-23 19:48:19+00:00): Niet alles is een wandelpad  Een highway=footway heeft meestal een G7 bord. Een oprit is bv geen footway.
eggie (2024-08-23 19:46:58+00:00): warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway
  	1
eggie (2024-08-23 19:46:39+00:00): Zijn dit officiele openbare parkeerterreinen?

Dat lijkt me niet.
nieuwlaurens (2024-08-28 17:45:58+00:00): klopt, excuses, dan heb ik het verkeerd aangevinkt..
eggie (2024-08-28 18:23:20+00:00): Oke..  Alle begin is moeilijk.
Deze parkeerterreinen kun je zelf verwijderen.
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2024-08-23 19:45:30+00:00): Beste laurens.. Je bent in hoog tempo en niet heel erg precies van alles aan het toevoegen onder commentaar van woonerf. Je doet echter iets heel anders. 
Zou je je commentaar kunnen aanpassen en iets nauwkeuriger kunnen werken?
`MVG
eggie
nieuwlaurens (2024-08-28 17:44:40+00:00): beste, sorry, ik snap deze website nog niet helemaal. ik ben nu bezig om molenwijk nauwkeurig up te daten met voetpaden etc, wat allemaal nog ontbreekt? mvg laurens
eggie (2024-08-28 18:26:15+00:00): Prima...  Alle begin is moeilijk.
Tip Neem er de tijd voor in het begin voor een aanpassing. De snelheid van werken komt vanzelf .
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-08-23 19:43:25+00:00): Beste laurens  Je vult steeds in Woonerf bij je uploads, maar is dat ook wat je hebt aangepast?

MVG
eggie
sw_uwu (2024-08-24 00:41:02+00:00): Solange der Weg noch existiert, solltest du ihn mit access=no taggen, anstatt vollständig zu löschen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dno
*abq* (2024-10-11 12:56:44+00:00): Ich habe die Löschung revertiert aus den von sw_uwu genannten Grund. Der Weg war bereits als abandoned und mit access=no getagged.
VG Reiner
eggie (2024-08-23 20:12:58+00:00): Tip access=permissive volstaat. dat geldt dan voor alle categorieën.
Groet
eggie
_Lies Boer (2024-08-26 08:21:03+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Okay, ik heb deze naar prive gezet aangezien alles hier prive is. Maar zal ze in het vervolg op permissive zetten :)
eggie (2024-08-23 19:40:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
EneaSuper (2024-08-24 10:09:51+00:00): Ciao LucioGE, grazie per quanto hai fatto!

Ho però notato che una delle stradine che si collegano alla rotonda (proprio dal lato della rotonda stessa) ha una forma strana, saresti in grado di sistemarla?

Questo il link all'elemento: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300353709#map=19/44.468557/8.899308

Ciao e buon lavoro 🙂
LucioGE (2024-08-24 17:07:15+00:00): Fatto ciao
tyfi (2024-08-23 19:39:47+00:00): This is a manual edit. Some varying renderings discovered:

Highway Af
State Route Af
State Highway Z
East State Highway HH
East Route HH
State Highway Y North
tyfi (2024-08-23 19:40:41+00:00): Directional affixes are not part of the state designation, by the way. Counties may have their own locator systems, but those locators do not render as affixes on state designations.
tyfi (2024-08-23 19:43:37+00:00): ^ To clarify, a local community may refer to a road by whatever name is chooses. The directional affixes on MO supplemental state routes from TIGER, however, are poor quality. The TIGER import wrongly assumed, for example, the letters N, E, S, and W were directional indicators rather than highway designations.
h551w (2024-10-06 06:40:48+00:00): I assume the name of this place might have been affected by autocorrect, but I don't want to just change it right away without checking with you since it could just be the case the restaurant owner came up with an incredibly funny thing to name their business in The Dalles
Yunan973 (2024-08-24 15:44:54+00:00): Bonjour,

pour la crèche, le toit est défini par des building:part ayant des infos détaillées roof:shape, merci de ne pas mettre des données contradictoires sur le contour building (chemin 71487601).

Voir la représentation 3D actuelle :
https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=4.9416568&lon=-52.3220234&zoom=21&camera.phi=-108.574
Yunan973 (2024-08-24 16:20:01+00:00): Pour  info je n'ai pas fini le rendu 3D de ce bâtiment, merci de patienter, d'autres modifs sont prévues
aTarom (2024-08-24 07:17:23+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, cuando puedas revisa esta way con tags no standard
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1310665778/history
Saludos y feliz mapeo
lololailo (2024-08-29 20:32:17+00:00): Perdona que no contestara pero estuve unos días "desconectado". No recuerdo como lo hice exactamente pero ya está todo en orden. Gracias
JJIglesias (2024-08-24 04:33:45+00:00): Gracias por el Aporte, Parte de los datos en OSM son los datos oficiales del INE, asi q hemos dejado los nombres del INE como alternativos, pero los nombres mas visibles seran los que colocaste.
Gracias por tu aporte al mapa.
Slds
JJ
jmaspons (2024-09-03 10:55:36+00:00): Hi! Is there any reason for the change in the place tag from "sea" to "yes"?
Merlin13245 (2024-08-26 17:26:41+00:00): Nice addition. Thanks for contributing to the map!
silversurfer83 (2024-08-25 06:40:55+00:00): Hi

if the gate really is closed a simple "access=no" would be enough. All other access tags are not needed in this case.

To help your fellow mappers something like "note=At $DATE this gate was closed for all traffic" and if there was a sign, maybe put the text of the sign in "description=$TEXT"

safe travels
silversurfer83
JSp1152 (2024-08-26 10:35:17+00:00): Good hint, thanks
Langlaeufer (2024-08-26 16:35:56+00:00): hier wäre wohl razed:bridge und razed:highway besser gewesen, damit die verbindung nicht wieder eingemalt wird.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155670891
Xvtn (2024-09-10 19:28:23+00:00): Out of curiosity, does non-existence in the most recent data imply that it was removed, or that it never existed at all?
quincylvania (2024-09-10 23:28:43+00:00): This node was imported from NHD, which makes me think that this gage probably existed at some point (though not necessarily at this exact location). Normally I would use `disused:monitoring_station` instead of deleting it, but as there is no NWIS ID number or other identifier associated with the station, the distinction would be essentially useless. There are over 1.7 million historical USGS monitoring stations, but only about 15,000 active. These I'm maintaining in OSM with this tool: https://github.com/quincylvania/usgs-to-osm
Xvtn (2024-09-11 01:12:42+00:00): Makes sense. Thanks for the info!! :)
Bobbi123 (2024-08-23 22:25:15+00:00): Wo kann ich das bei Bayernwerk öffentlich nachlesen? Auf der Homepage von Bayernwerk sind nur Infos bis runter 110kV-Netz zu finden. Woher weißt du also explizit, dass es sich hier um eine 20kV-Leitung handelt? Solange das nicht zweifelsfrei belegt ist, ist diese Info nur wage und damit nicht gesichtert.

Ich will dir damit nichts Böses aber es muss einfach geklärt und belegbar sein, welches Spannungsniveau hier tatsächlich stimmt. Ansonsten sind hier ggf. falsche Daten in OSM, auf die ja auch andere Kartendienste zugreifen und sich somit Fehler multiplizieren könnten.
Bobbi123 (2024-08-24 14:44:41+00:00): Wegen weiterer Ignorierung erneut zurückgesetzt. Erst wenn die 20kV zweifelsfrei gesichtert nachgewiesen werden können, kann es bleiben. Ansonsten basieren diese auf Vermutungen bzw. nicht nachprüfbaren Quellen.

Was ist denn bitte so schwer dran, ganz einfach eine simple Quelle für die 20kV zu liefern? Dann wäre alles geklärt und alle sind zufrieden. Aber so, also durch weiteres Ignorieren von Rückfragen, ist hier keine zielführende Informationsvalidierung möglich.
VLD549 (2024-09-18 14:34:56+00:00): Hi, my job is to verify the name change from Freineitschool De Sassepoort - Sppor 9 to Freinetschool De Sassepoort - Spoor 9.
The change is correct, but the site shows a different location. Could you have a look and perhaps make an adjustment in the mapping?
Thank you! 
https://scholen.stad.gent/freinetdesassepoortspoor9/contact
Ruben Van de Velde (2024-09-18 14:47:45+00:00): This is correct - this is the building site for a new school building that the school will move to once it's finished. See e.g. https://www.nieuwsblad.be/cnt/dmf20220614_93695527
VLD549 (2024-10-04 12:24:54+00:00): Ok, thank you.
woodpeck_repair (2024-08-23 20:36:07+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 105716228, 107076992, 107077315, 110444072, 110444100, 110444137, 110444172, 110444218, 110444259, 110444279, 110444328, 110444361, 110533280, 110533304, 110533331, 110533361, 110728373, 110730453, 154249146, 154462225, 154500274, 154642906, 154642909, 154665926, 154685167, 154690087, 154709315, 154728018, 154749825, 154750416, 154767757, 154768636, 154785879, 154803886, 154804048, 154806467, 154807254, 154821945, 154826845, 154827121, 154827190, 154876722, 154968853, 155000674, 155051131, 155079387, 155093002, 155176475, 155176478, 155185962, 155185965, 155185968, 155185971, 155192319, 155229332, 155229709, 155229831, 155232089, 155236291, 155275961, 155277194, 155280869, 155311050, 155325070, 155327236, 155330732, 155348079, 155353646, 155354109, 155356535, 155357456, 155362424, 155368650, 155388744, 155400388, 155400394, 155404604, 155411343, 155413585, 155451395, 155470604, 155470612, 155484823, 155504909, 155544458, 155549596, 155549608, 155553956, 155592609, 155600489, 155600858, 155602206, 155621525, 155637716, 155640275, 155642305, 155644607, 155648080, 155648085.
mcliquid (2024-08-23 20:38:17+00:00): Thank you!
Tomas_J (2025-04-16 07:06:21+00:00): ...koukám ze Natural=Wood používáš pro každý maly keř v parcích atd. Je to prostě špatně , má se použít jen na území (tree-covered area), ne na mapování individuálních keřů a stromů...
Arktorus (2025-04-25 22:55:43+00:00): ok. zatím pokračuju v opravách. Děkuji za poukázání na tuto chybu :D
tyfi (2024-08-23 20:52:13+00:00): Newly discovered designation renderings include:

Sthy East (botched form of "State Highway E")
N Route East (botched "North Route East" with inappropriate directional prefix)
East Highway E
State NN and State Nn
Bb Highway
tyfi (2024-08-23 20:55:40+00:00): This was a manual edit for the record.
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-15 15:01:21+00:00): Wiesz w ogóle co robisz ? Basen z adresem. Tu w ogóle były według ciebie trzy obiekty z tym samym adresem.
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-15 15:06:43+00:00): Wiesz w ogóle co robisz ? Basen z adresem. Tu w ogóle były według ciebie trzy obiekty z tym samym adresem.

Edycja na podstawie Bing-a. W Survey - ciekawe ?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Strona_g%C5%82%C3%B3wna

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5
ivrigthighjob (2025-01-15 18:31:00+00:00): Survey jest poniewaz mam zdjecia w okolicznosci tutaj i jest basen.
Strubbl (2024-08-30 19:45:52+00:00): Hallo UKausch, dieses Haus, das du hier aktualisiert hast, hast du mit dem Objekt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/137706742 verwechselt. Dies hier ist nicht, das ehemalige Feuerwehrhaus. Evtl. macht es Sinn, dieses Objekt hier auf Version #3 oder #4 zurückzusetzen.
UKausch (2024-10-16 21:39:19+00:00): Hallo Sven,   
passt, das Gebäude hat wieder die Eigenschaften der Version 4.   
Servus   
Uwe   
https://osm.org/changeset/157984390
dieterdreist (2024-08-24 15:36:39+00:00): Hi, there is no castle here.
ivanbranco (2024-08-24 19:34:01+00:00): Questo utente é giá stato bloccato una volta (3 mesi fa) per lo stesso motivo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7112
Langlaeufer (2024-11-19 19:10:06+00:00): Hallo Tim,
am way https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/260757479
hattest du hier leider verschlimmbessert. Nur die Korrektur von surface war gut. Die gesetzten Parameter gehören an die Fahrbahn und nicht an den Seitenweg. "*" sind nur Platzhalte in der Doku.  

Ich hab es bereits korrigiert, wie do oben in der Historie sehen kannst.

Beispiele für richtiges Tagging siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren

Bei Fragen kannst du dich gene an mich wenden.

Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155673499
FraukeLeo (2025-04-05 20:13:34+00:00): Hallo Timbrando, war gut gemeint, aber ein only-left-turn funktioniert nur, wenn es eine Relation ist, und so was willst du in deinem fünften Changeset noch nicht bauen. Wenn sich so was aus einer Einbahnstraßenregelung ergibt und das Blechschild nur aus Nettigkeit zusätzlich da steht, bauen wir gar keine Relation ein, weil kein Navi falschrum in eine Einbahnstraße routen würde. Schilder am Straßenrand kannst du mit traffic_sign erfassen.
eggie (2024-08-24 08:12:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Alle begin is moeilijk. building=church hoort niet op de adresnode. Dat is geen gebouw. Die tag staat al op de gebouwomtrek. Ik zal je tag weer verwijderen.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
MissMarcoPolo (2024-08-26 17:54:23+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2024-08-19; Staðfangaskrá.
fortera_au (2024-08-23 22:29:57+00:00): Hi, is there a reason why you've changed this cycleway to an unclassified road in a changeset named test? This is not a test environment.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155673716
fortera_au (2024-08-23 22:33:01+00:00): I've reverted this, there isn't a second road showing in aerial imagery

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155674712
tyfi (2024-08-23 21:53:43+00:00): Examples of new designation formats discovered along the way:

East Missouri Z Highway
North D
State Highway W Northeast
Southwest M Highway
Northwest State Oo Highway
Nestate Hwy NN (?)
N Cl N Highway (?! - "Cl" meaning "Clay County")
Allison P (2024-08-24 06:03:26+00:00): TIGER name formats are as diverse as the animal's stripes.

I'm quite fond of "Northwest State Oo Highway". It sounds like I've been distracted in the middle of saying the name.
tyfi (2024-08-24 06:26:14+00:00): Ooh, a highway! My favorite has to be when the letter is mistaken for a directional suffix, e.g. "State Highway North". I even saw the letter O mistaken for a direction suffix in the TIGER import (what direction could that mean?)

Sometimes they're mistakenly referred to as county roads, too (e.g. "N Cl N Highway"), which I bet hearkens back to the Takeover Program. Dunno for sure, though. I wish I could know the rationale behind some of these names.
tyfi (2024-08-24 06:31:22+00:00): Also funny is Webster County which applies the names "Long State Highway P"/"Short State Highway P" and "Long State Highway Y"/"Short State Highway Y" to segments of MO P and MO Y, respectively, when they're cut in half by north-south roads.
kitsee (2024-08-25 17:26:29+00:00): Hi Rosey,
this is incorrect. everything I'm about to say is mostly UK specific. addr:unit should be used with a named building.  addr:place is used when multiple buildings belong to a "place" that is not a street. 

I was going to use this as an example but just discovered I forgot to map it :D
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1298656985#map=19/51.774907/-3.300622
but here, there are multiple named houses on this street but the street has no name, so i'll be adding "addr:place=Butetown" when I map it addr:place is used as a replacement for addr:street for these cases. 

Addresses shouldn't be split between objects. so in this case, all the addr tags should be deleted from the building and added to each of the entrances so each entrance has a complete address. or to put it another way the building shouldn't have an address since no one would ever write a letter to the building as a whole so it shouldn't have any address tags.
Hope this helps.
Kind regards,
Kits
Rosey-Posey (2024-08-25 17:59:03+00:00): You know I think I read the UK addressing wiki page when I first did this, I then read the general guide and got a bit confused.
Enock4seth (2024-11-04 12:03:31+00:00): Hi, data in OpenStreetMap should be verifiable. Unfortunately the maxspeed=30 is not. 
You can see what the speed limit is at https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=5.551382553813923&lng=-0.19400795959847983&z=19.9&pKey=517473239420891&focus=photo
Bobropiton (2024-08-25 15:32:08+00:00): Добрый день. Зачем были внесены неактуальные данные по месторасположению остановок? Остановки действительно недавно были построены с расчетом на перенос, однако, движение автобусов по текущий момент происходит по боковому проезду. Ваша правка была откачена в пакете 155743132
Bobropiton (2024-08-25 15:32:32+00:00): Добрый день. Зачем были внесены неактуальные данные по месторасположению остановок? Остановки действительно недавно были построены с расчетом на перенос, однако, движение автобусов по текущий момент происходит по боковому проезду. Ваша правка была откачена в пакете 155743132
tyfi (2024-08-23 22:15:37+00:00): Discovered rendering "NE State Highway North" with incorrect N -> North expansion
woodpeck_repair (2024-08-27 21:18:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 155851871, 155851861, 155851813, 155851893, 155851796, 155851836, 155851832, 155851785, 155851884, 155851790, 155851856, 155851847, 155851807, 155851810, 155851849, 155851818, 155851815, 155851889, 155851769, 155851844, 155851823, 155851802, 155851877 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy and undiscussed import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16625
Arlo James Barnes (2024-08-27 03:39:07+00:00): I'm curious where it was overlapping. Is there an easy way to see a before/after for way changes?
VLD284 (2024-08-30 14:33:35+00:00): Hello Arlo James Barness,
Thank you for reaching out about changeset #155674718. The overlap occurred at way, w637670893. Please refer to https://osmcha.org/changesets/155674718 for more detail. I hope this clear things up and feel free to reach out with any questions.  
VLD284
serock (2024-08-26 20:00:19+00:00): Hola Camello_AR, consulta, la rotonda que dibujo entre las calles Colón y Guaminí es nueva, xq en el las imágenes satelitales de OSM no figura
Camello_AR (2024-08-26 20:06:02+00:00): Si, se inauguró la semana pasada. https://azuldigital.gob.ar/se-habilito-la-rotonda-del-parque-municipal/ lamentablemente todavía no hay fotografías satelitales por lo que me guíe de capturas de un vídeo tomando con un dron que publicó el municipio más el conocimiento local. Me falta luego rectificar con trazas GPS, que no pude tomar aún
serock (2024-08-27 13:43:39+00:00): Ok, muchas gracias !!!
rohieb (2024-10-11 20:24:09+00:00): Hast du noch Ahnung, wo der Name "Reinhards-Eiche" für https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6022404881 herkommt? Ich hab vorhin (allerdings schon bei Dunkelheit) kein Schild am Baum gesehen.
quincylvania (2024-08-23 23:44:24+00:00): In California and Nevada not the four corners lol
mueschel (2024-08-26 12:15:35+00:00): HI,could you check the parking tags?

'parking:both:access:private' should be 'parking:both:private'.
CAM-Gerlach (2024-08-27 20:49:11+00:00): Oops, sorry about that! Thanks for the catch; I'd checked the wiki and taginfo before as usual but saw very low usage (only a few hundred hits) of the correct tag and none of my many validators flagged the incorrect one, so I didn't realize I'd made a mistake and not entered it correctly the first time, which then propagated to the others.

I've fixed it in changeset 155850997 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155850997
HolgerJeromin (2024-08-25 21:15:17+00:00): Please update your SCEE app. 
https://github.com/Helium314/SCEE/releases
It had a bug which entered buggy data:
https://github.com/Helium314/SCEE/issues/602
user_5589 (2024-08-25 21:53:13+00:00): Too late. I'd already updated to the alpha by the time you posted that comment. I'll have a hunt around using Overpass and see if I can get rid of those buggy tags.
tyfi (2024-08-23 23:59:59+00:00): Found this new designation:

East Sthwy Uu
Glassman (2024-12-31 18:04:21+00:00): The DWG received a request to remove the Taint trail for being very unsafe.  Another user agreed that it is very unsafe. Since you added this trail, would you agree that it should be removed?