piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MassCartog (2025-11-08 03:13:42+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. These changes are incorrect. Please familiarize yourself with best practices around how the open Street Community Maps parking aisles features before removing them. Don't remove features that exist, correct them. This changeset has been reverted.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle
Langlaeufer (2025-11-16 10:28:08+00:00): auch dieser Weg war vom den inkonsistenten Änderungen betroffen. Ich habe das vermutlich weiterhin korrekte alte Tagging wieder hergestellt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174355546
KnuFloh001 (2025-11-16 13:40:56+00:00): Hallo Langläufer,
danke für den Hinweis. Der straßenbegleitenden Weg ist tatsächlich als Gehweg miz dem Zusatzschild "Radfahrer frei" ausgeschildert. Daher passt das Zurücksetzen. Danke.
Viele Grüße
KnuFloh001
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174355546
Langlaeufer (2025-11-16 10:27:06+00:00): Hallo KnuFluoh001,
willkommen bei OSM. Schön das du uns hilfts die karte zu verbessern und aktuell zu halten. Die Änderungen an dem Fußweg hier habe jedoch dazu geführt das die Eigenschaften sind nicht konsistent sind. Ich habe sie daher erstmal zurückgesetzt. Sollte sich die Beschilderung tatsächlich geändert haben bin ich gerne beim korrekten Tagging behilflich.
Grüße Langläufer.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174355567
eggie (2025-11-08 07:03:51+00:00): Dag Openswenmap,

Dat zal best, maar ik denk dat het de bedoeling is dat  fietsers de fietsoversteek pakken.
Heel duidelijk is het allemaal niet. 
Het kleine stukje vanaf de noordelijke splitsing is naar links oneway=yes, maar naar rechts hoort het oneway=no te zijn ipv yes.
Er is ook duidelijk een gebroken lijn te zien op het fietspad en een fietsoversteek is aangegeven met verfstrepen op het wegdek Zandkant.
De oversteek kan dus beter op bicycle=use_sidepath en dan de oneway=yes aanpassen naar oneway=no op de fietsaansluiting.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-11-08 07:18:20+00:00): Als bovenstaand aangepast.
Wat fietsers doen in de praktijk is natuurlijk wat anders.
MVG
eggie
aTarom (2025-11-08 08:41:15+00:00): Hola, conec aquesta zona
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13288173254/history
com a “Sol i Aigua”. “Sant Medil” potser és “Sant Medir”?
Salutacions i gràcies per editar.
swaree (2025-11-08 13:18:50+00:00): Hola gràcies pel comentari. Efectivament era errata. He afegit "Sol i Aigua" i "Sant Medir" com official_name.
大山かなめ (2025-11-09 10:32:09+00:00): way/987098371など、いくつかのウェイで
amenity=university
disused:amenity=university
という矛盾したタグ付けが見られるようです。今一度、ご確認ください。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174356003
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-01 22:22:34+00:00): na nazwy historyczne jest OpenHistoricalMap, nie OpenStreetMap

a wsadzanie ich do name:pl jest wprost błędne i szkodliwe

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175378542
Jerome Roberts (2025-11-08 00:17:12+00:00): if i had the time, I would go map it all out and add the businesses, but sadly I don't have the time. their is an local Amazon warehouse and an At Woods here..  the tractor supply is also messed up. lots to fix and no time to fix it and sadly no sat imagery to use either.
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-08 16:56:14+00:00): "Paved" would be a generic value.  If you know the type of pavement, that would be of greater value.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dpaved
jamesh (2025-11-08 19:38:24+00:00): Noted -- I'll differentiate in future updates
B252697 (2025-11-08 00:32:07+00:00): Earlier this morning, when I was looking at the Leaflet map, I had a shock. Like why is there a district region name in Singapore called "Artificial Island" around the area of Lentor? Turns out it was due to this. Have remedied it.
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:10:00+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174356501
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:15:56+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174356583
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:16:42+00:00): #TIP: building outline should match the roof outline. Can you fix this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174356626
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:17:34+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: only one tag for the coffee stand is needed. Either the outline or a node.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174356656
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:10:05+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174356679
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:17:51+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174356687
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:22:33+00:00): It appears the drive through is still there, just not operational. In these cases, the way should be left because it still exists.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174356705
Edilson Nhanenge (2025-11-10 19:43:06+00:00): Este polígono foi uma falha.
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:18:11+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174356726
MassCartog (2025-11-08 03:37:31+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. Unless the building is gone, next time just remove the tags and leave the building outline. Thanks.
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:18:54+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174356788
NeisBot (2025-11-08 00:57:41+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Orthodontic clinic in San Antonio"
NeisBot (2025-11-08 00:57:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisRevert (2025-11-08 21:34:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/174395388
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove unclear map edits
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:19:48+00:00): It would be better to outline the entire building, then use nodes for each business.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174356828
NeisBot (2025-11-08 01:00:41+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Orthodontic clinic in San Antonio Texas"
NeisBot (2025-11-08 01:00:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisRevert (2025-11-08 21:33:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/174395356
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove unclear map edits
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-08 23:02:18+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18941
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:20:04+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174356862
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:10:11+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174356868
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:20:21+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174356904
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:10:16+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174356964
notmyproblem1 (2025-11-09 17:59:46+00:00): Per favore mappa il luogo "MiniMart+" come nodo/punto e non come edificio, il civico spostalo sul nodo/punto, grazie
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-11-08 13:01:15+00:00): Salut!

Petite question: pourquoi le SRB Pie-Ix a été séparé sur le pont Pie-IX? Il n'y a pas de barrière, seulement une ligne double. Normalement, on doit utiliser les tag busway:left...
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-11-08 13:49:05+00:00): J'ai complété la route SRB Pie-IX (relation) avec les bonnes directions et retiré le trajet au milieu du point qui était déjà taggé sur la voie des voitures avec busway:left (pas de séparation physique). C'est maintenant complet et validé. Merci et bonne fin de semaine!
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:10:33+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174357056
蕉饼电脑 (2025-11-08 06:43:38+00:00): 编辑中值得提醒的一些问题：
路口前若无物理障碍，无需将道路分为两条路径。
得以使用方向表示禁止通行时，尽量不使用关系。52个转向限制关系对于一个四向环岛属实过于复杂。
这些问题在以下变更集中被修改：
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174356518
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174359640
lilauid (2025-11-08 16:24:19+00:00): 多謝閣下提醒
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:11:04+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174357125
user_5359 (2025-11-08 08:04:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition! By the way, we write the time in 24-hour notation and do not abbreviate minutes or hours (always 4 numbers and a colon).
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:22:50+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174357217
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:11:27+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174357234
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:23:01+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174357257
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:23:15+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174357279
aharvey (2025-11-08 03:45:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1448328912

I think if it's natural woodlands over a larger area but the nature of the trees there is that they are sparse then it's fine, but in a metro park or in this case a cemetery where there are graves underneath I think a natural=wood area like this is incorrect and mapping for the renderer, and it should be done via natural=tree nodes for each tree.
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:11:38+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174357350
pwbriggs (2025-11-08 19:32:26+00:00): Looks good to me, thank you for the edit! Adding these kinds of small details are what make OpenStreetMap data so good.

I also added the parking lot and drive-through lanes, because that's fun :)

Feel free to ask any questions here. I plan to look over your other changes later. Thanks again, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:23:30+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174357448
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:13:11+00:00): The footpath should connect to the road for routers to use it. Can you connect it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174357449
sophiebattcwu (2025-11-08 21:19:17+00:00): Fixed. Thank you for letting me know!
b-jazz (2025-11-09 16:21:41+00:00): hello gpneal,

Please make sure the areas on a golf course don't intersect each other. Like on the first hole, your fairway was intersecting the green. Also, it's best to modify existing areas instead of deleting them and drawing them from scratch. You lose valuable history when you delete work. thanks.
NeisBot (2025-11-08 01:57:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Email marketing company"
NeisBot (2025-11-08 01:57:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-11-08 21:31:56+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174386628
NeisReview (2025-11-08 21:32:14+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/174386628
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:23:42+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174357513
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:28:32+00:00): #TIP: for a small feature like this sculpture, just use a node. Much easier
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174357521
pwbriggs (2025-11-08 17:19:44+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! We do not allow SEO content to be added to the database. If your business has a publicly-available, walk-in location, we can help you add it to the map. Otherwise, OpenStreetMap does not intend to map online-only services.

I've removed both of your edits.

Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks!
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:30:59+00:00): The size of the building seem unrealistic, plus it overlaps a service road at the south end. Can you reivew this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174357539
pwbriggs (2025-11-16 21:12:08+00:00): I shrunk this shop back to a single node, with the phone number and data you provided, until we figure out the building's outline. Thanks!
pwbriggs (2025-11-16 21:13:18+00:00): (oops, never mind about the phone number, I misread.)
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:13:27+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174357552
aharvey (2025-11-08 03:56:08+00:00): the full length can be left, but the way can be split and tagged with access=private if there's no public access at all...
Gavin of Mt Perry (2025-11-08 05:21:42+00:00): Sound like a good plan, but I'm not sure how to do that?
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:23:55+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174357587
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:24:05+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174357651
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:31:16+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174357685
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:24:17+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174357701
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:31:27+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174357717
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:24:38+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174357790
jhuang97 (2025-12-04 14:54:13+00:00): Hi, thanks for working on this area. I removed the name of this school area, see comment on changeset 175498800.
PetriniJM (2025-11-08 02:35:24+00:00): I personally prefer this over randomly dropping nodes in the middle of building polygons, unsure if combining amenities with their main entrance in a building is the proper way to map this (I haven't seen this used in my local area) but it maintains the "one feature, one OSM element" rule and it more accurately depicts where each amenity can be accessed from.
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:33:38+00:00): It appears you are adding a building inside of an existing building. You could just remove any tags referencing the closed business. Also you added the layer=-1 tag which seems to imply the building is below ground. Please review this edit
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174357935
pwbriggs (2025-11-16 21:29:24+00:00): I updated this. Thanks for the contributions!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174357935
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:37:40+00:00): Please leave a brief changeset comment such as added address and name to existing building
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174357939
UnusualWorld (2025-11-08 13:55:02+00:00): Please don't include changes from different countries in the same changeset, it makes the bounding box unnecessarily large.
muralito (2025-11-08 20:53:10+00:00): Oi Victor, obrigado pela contribuição. Os nós que mapeiam geradores não devem ser conectados à via que mapeia o caminho.
Victor Nogueira Antunes (2025-11-08 21:35:02+00:00): Aproveitando o contato, como eu faço para enviar as fotos que eu tenho do drone? Tenho uma boa área já mapeada, vejo que o mapa está extremamente desatualizado nessa região.
muralito (2025-11-09 12:03:36+00:00): As fotos aéreas ortorretificadas você pode enviar https://openaerialmap.org/

Depois, elas ficam disponíveis como mosaicos em uma URL do tipo https://apps.kontur.io/raster-tiler/oam/mosaic/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.png
Anas masuris (2025-11-08 23:13:18+00:00): Po raz kolejny przypominam, że dla obszarów ścieżek, gdzie ruch jest ukierunkowany (alejki, ścieżki) nie należy stosować area=yes + highway=*.

Ani tym bardziej poprawne nie jest area=yes + area:highway=* + highway=*. Jest to błąd i można to uznać za tagowanie pod render.

Dla ścieżek/alejek wyraźnie liniowych/osiowych o ukierunkowanym ruchu: area:highway=*

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:area:highway%3Dpedestrian

Dla placów, gdzie pieszy ma dowolność wyboru kierunku: area=yes + highway=pedestrian

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian
"An area (closed way or multipolygon) tagged with highway=pedestrian + area=yes is the most common way to map the pedestrian area of a square or plaza, where pedestrians can travel freely in all directions"

Proszę to poprawić w tej, jak i poprzednich edycjach
SafwatHalaby (2025-11-08 10:08:51+00:00): שלום, הוספתם כאן שכפול על אובייקט קיים.

מערה 1 (המקורית): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4181072805

מערה 2 (המשוכפלת):

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13288433501


מציע למחוק את המשוכפלת ולהעתיק את התמונה שהוספת למקורית.
Yitzchak M (2025-11-08 12:43:17+00:00): You are correct! I made the fix. Thanks for catching that. But how did you catch it so fast? I only did it a few hours earlier? (The cave was NOT a point of interest in Israel Hiking Maps, so I tried to add a POI to the original cave, and I now see that I did not succeed.)
SafwatHalaby (2025-11-11 07:27:20+00:00): I monitor Israel with various tools.

If I remember correctly what caught this was running Achavi over the area (I watch certain regions periodically with Achavi):

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/
aharvey (2025-11-08 06:04:09+00:00): why are there bbq's at the station exit?
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-11-08 13:19:27+00:00): 朋友您好，“ 降弓用刑”并非一个可验证的地理实体，而只是一个著名梗的发生地。如果现实中不存在名为“ 降弓用刑”名称的地理实物，请不要在OSM上绘制它。这条评论是基于OSM基本原则中“实地求是”的原则来要求的。

感谢您的理解，祝绘图愉快
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-11-09 04:07:42+00:00): Merhaba. Binanın adından "Veterinerlik Fakültesi"ni silmişsiniz. Ve oldukça uzun bir ad eklemişsiniz. Bu binanın adı "...Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri Bölümü"değildir herhalde? Öyle mi?

Üniversitenin adını, binanın ad etiketine eklemek de doğru gibi durmuyor. Zaten operator=* etiketinde mevcut. Lütfen bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

İyi günler.
Cem Melik Sezen (2025-11-10 22:23:22+00:00): Merhabalar, öncelikle iletişime geçtiğiniz için teşekkürler. Size geç geri dönüş yaptığım için özür dilerim. Gerekli düzenlemeler yapıldı Bina adı güncellendi. silinen bölümler geri eklendi. Yeni bölüm eklendi. İyi günler dilerim
OddlyAngled (2025-11-08 15:49:31+00:00): only a handful of trails in Yosemite have official names..  the trailheads do, of course.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174360494
valhikes (2025-11-08 17:06:22+00:00): Yeah, I see that. For this one: strongly implied, logical, in use (the important bit), but not official.
OddlyAngled (2025-11-08 22:30:04+00:00): yep, wasn’t saying it was an issue at all. most of the sole trails to a lake have been named after the lake in osm. that’s what everyone calls them anyways.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-11-08 05:57:59+00:00): There also a non-free illustration about exit serial for your reference:

https://imgur.com/a/L5LwQQH

Since this is non-free source, I haven't reference this when mapping and based on my local knowledge that living in beijing for years, and ask some beijinger friend still in China.
NeisBot (2025-11-08 06:24:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-08 06:24:41+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Family Cleaners Cleaning Services Connecticut West Hartford"
NeisReview (2025-11-08 21:31:04+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174362473