piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TopoNick (2025-11-19 03:32:49+00:00): Hi there! I noticed that this changeset reverted some recent surface tagging I added on I-15 in Las Vegas. Was that intentional? If so, could you please share the reasoning so I can better understand?

Also, for future edits, it would be helpful to split very large changesets into smaller, more focused ones. That makes it much easier to review what was changed and why. Thanks so much!
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-11-19 21:08:15+00:00): That was completely unintentional. JOSM's edit conflict resolver is usually something I want to avoid because I might need to sync all the data in my active layer, which might not even work. Also, I was mainly adding NHS and "is_in:state" tags to major cross-country highways, so I don't think I could've made the changeset smaller.
ZLima12 (2025-11-20 02:57:53+00:00): You are still responsible for the data that you upload. If you see a conflict resolver then you need to actually try to resolve the conflict instead of just overwriting good data that others uploaded.

If you want to avoid edit conflicts, then try to edit fewer things at a time and try to not take too long from the time you download the data to when you upload. In this case, you could have done one changeset per route, for example.
TopoNick (2025-11-21 02:38:13+00:00): I agree with ZLima12. Next time, please try doing smaller and more targeted edits. When conflicts arise, that's a clear sign that too much has been changed at once and those warnings should not be ignored.
NeisBot (2025-11-08 06:30:41+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Law firm in Tempe"
NeisBot (2025-11-08 06:30:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-11-08 21:30:29+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174362410
f_husni (2026-05-22 02:24:45+00:00): Hallo mas, mau tanya, untuk https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1303318680/history#map=19/-6.377160/106.595243&layers=N kenapa diberi layer -1 yaa? apakah jalan tersebut terowongan ? atau berada di bawah jalan overpas ?
FajrAl (2026-05-22 03:09:41+00:00): Sepertinya ini dulu saya pakai iD, sudah lupa kenapanya, yang pasti jalan bukan terowongan. Sudah diperbaiki.
f_husni (2026-05-22 07:24:46+00:00): okee2 siap. terimakasih mas. ini saya habis cek osmose ada anomali data layer -1 di jawa barat. kalau mau di cek monggo mas. https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issues/open?source=32228&item=4110&class=41104
NeisBot (2025-11-08 06:39:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Junk removal service in Puget Sound area"
NeisBot (2025-11-08 06:39:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-11-08 21:23:06+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174362327
ieguy3 (2025-11-08 06:42:51+00:00): the omnitrans route was a duplicate route. was a stub as well
StC (2025-11-08 17:44:35+00:00): Hi,

this changeset has broken the continuity of a hiking route that passes there. I'll take care of the fix.
gscholz (2025-11-09 06:58:47+00:00): Hi StC,
thanks for your kind intervention.
Guido
OpenSvenMap (2025-11-08 10:58:11+00:00): Haha dit is de andere oplossing waar ik over aan het twijfelen was...
eggie (2025-11-08 11:03:09+00:00): Hoi..
Yep.. Ik denk dat het nu wel klopt.
Het routeerde sowieso niet.
Evt zou je nog wel kunnen kijken welke stukken G11 zijn en welke stukken G12a.
Daarover ben ik niet zeker.
Volgende update van bv de openfietsmap gaat het hier weer goed.
Mapse..
eggie
NeisBot (2025-11-08 07:26:23+00:00): Hi gehmirausdersonne, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #NoComment
NeisBot (2025-11-08 07:26:24+00:00): Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Updated maximum speed limits on roads"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 13:26:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174376166, 174376209, 174376101, 174376051 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import of poor quality data - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174352946 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18934 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18933
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:35:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
nmimn (2025-11-08 07:39:49+00:00): Oprava: upraveny byly jezy, ne brody.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:38:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 11:28:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174370825 where the changeset comment is: Reverting changes by user that refuses to communicate with rest of community - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18932
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:38:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:35:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:38:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:35:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
Nakaner (2026-06-09 11:29:52+00:00): Hallo,

bei der Kontrolle nach einem umfangreichen Revert fiel mir auf, dass du bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13288662795 einen Routing-Defekt (Überschneidung ohne gemeinsamen Node) produziert hast. Kannst du das bitte prüfen und korrigieren?

iD hat dich übrigens gewarnt. ;-)

Viele Grüße

Michael
NeisBot (2025-11-08 08:24:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-08 08:24:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Storage facility in Lakeview Michigan"
NeisReview (2025-11-08 21:22:06+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174395017
Jrachi (2025-11-09 09:46:30+00:00): Ciao.
Hai assegnato alla relazione con ref=022a
osmc:symbol=red:red:white_stripe:022:black
rwn:name=Rete Patrimonio Escursionistico Piemonte (RPE)
Questo percorso non è nella RPE.
Come OSMC:symbol hai messo un codice diverso dal ref. Errore o hai frainteso il significato del tag?
Il percorso si sovrappone a ETOC002, la sovrapposizione, anche parziale, non annessa dalla RPE.

Tolgo il tag rwn:name mentre attendo risposta al resto.

Ivo
Jrachi (2025-11-09 09:52:38+00:00): Guardando meglio, ho visto una lacuna tra il 3° ed il 4° membro e mi sono accorto che la relazione dello 022A è diventato 045, ovvero ETOC0450.
Qualche anno fa l'intera area della collina torinese è stata ridefinita nella codifica.
Presumo che tu abbia trovato qualche vecchio cartello con il codice 022A, da cui l'equivoco.
Sarebbe molto più corretto aggiungere il tag old_ref=022A sulla relazione dello 045 e cancellare la relazione di questo 022A

Ivo
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:35:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:34:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
kenVaiphei (2025-11-08 08:39:11+00:00): Hi @Kautilya3, I noticed the village name (Laika Mualsau) was placed in a different location. I’ve corrected it to its proper position. Just letting you know—thanks for your contributions!
Dodko (2025-11-11 17:21:07+00:00): Adresa sa do POI duplicitne nedáva ak je uložená v budove, aplikácie si ju preberú z budovy.

A pozrite dokumentáciu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:education lebo tam chýbajú tagy čo to je, samotné education nemá význam.
notmyproblem1 (2025-11-09 17:54:46+00:00): per favore mappa la biblioteca come nodo singolo, controlla se non è già presente, e mappala come "Bibilioteca" e non nodo
Hung Tran 9x0 (2025-11-08 15:26:58+00:00): Bạn ơi, bạn có biết tại sao tôi tách đường Võ Chí Công ra làm 2 phần đường không? Bởi vì, người ta lắp rào chắn để tách một phần đường dành riêng cho ô tô và một phần đường hỗn hợp. Vậy mà bạn phá tan tành hết cả, ngay cả khi bạn chỉnh sửa lại thì nó vẫn chưa đúng. Bạn để biển cấm rẽ trái vào làn đường dành cho ô tô và để ngoại lệ cho xe máy, xe đạp, buýt làm gì chứ.
Hung Tran 9x0 (2025-11-08 15:27:33+00:00): Nếu bạn không phải người ở đây, hoặc không đi trên con đường này thì mong bạn đừng phá tung mọi thứ như vậy
lolow-import (2025-11-09 11:54:12+00:00): Osmose errors are currently discussed here https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/import-des-arrets-de-bus-a-grenoble-dapres-les-donnees-du-smmag/37782/19 (french). For more details in english about this automated import see here wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import_des_arrêts_des_cars_Région_Auvergne_Rhone-Alpes_depuis_les_données_du_SMMAG
eggie (2025-11-08 11:05:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Thierry1030 (2026-01-08 10:41:53+00:00): Dag stijnh,
Dit is geen nieuwe weg die wordt aangelegd, maar een "bestaande weg die wordt heraangelegd" ...
In dat geval is de tag highway=construction niet gepast.
Volgens de wiki moet de tag "motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ 2026 Jan 01-2026 ... .." gebruikt worden. Rond de straat zelf kan je nog een landuse=construction toevoegen. Is het mogelijk om dit aan te passen?
highway=construction?uselang=en
stijnh (2026-01-08 19:09:27+00:00): Dag Thierry1030,
was me niet helemaal duidelijk, want volgens die wiki leek het me wel zo aangepast te moeten worden.

How to map the start of a road repair or reconstruction
Suppose there is a road highway=tertiary that has been closed for a longer period of time due to repair or reconstruction. It is then necessary to:
replace highway=tertiary tag with highway=construction.

Maar de straat gaat snel weer open, dus heb het terug aangepast.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 13:26:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174376166, 174376209, 174376101, 174376051 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import of poor quality data - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174352946 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18934 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18933
NeisBot (2025-11-08 09:27:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-08 09:27:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Travel agency in Srinagar"
NeisReview (2025-11-08 21:21:16+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/174365822
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 13:26:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174376166, 174376209, 174376101, 174376051 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import of poor quality data - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174352946 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18934 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18933
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 13:26:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174376166, 174376209, 174376101, 174376051 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import of poor quality data - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174352946 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18934 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18933
user_5359 (2025-11-09 08:32:27+00:00): Hello! You have added the new tag نوع نان = لواش to three bakeries. Please notice we use britisch English for keys and standarised values. 

مرحبًا! لقد أضفت العلامة الجديدة نوع نان = لواش إلى ثلاث مخابز. يرجى ملاحظة أننا نستخدم الإنجليزية البريطانية للمفاتيح والقيم الموحدة.
aTarom (2025-11-08 12:08:44+00:00): Hello, adding elevations from SRTM is not appropriate because they can be automatically processed from the SRTM data itself. They are only accepted if they come from official sources or can be verified with another reliable source.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele
Cheers.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 13:26:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174376166, 174376209, 174376101, 174376051 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import of poor quality data - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174352946 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18934 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18933
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 13:25:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174376166, 174376209, 174376101, 174376051 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import of poor quality data - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174352946 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18934 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18933
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 13:26:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174376166, 174376209, 174376101, 174376051 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import of poor quality data - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174352946 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18934 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18933
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 13:25:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174376166, 174376209, 174376101, 174376051 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import of poor quality data - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174352946 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18934 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18933
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:34:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 13:25:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174376166, 174376209, 174376101, 174376051 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import of poor quality data - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174352946 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18934 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18933
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 13:26:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174376166, 174376209, 174376101, 174376051 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import of poor quality data - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174352946 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18934 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18933
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 13:26:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174376166, 174376209, 174376101, 174376051 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import of poor quality data - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174352946 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18934 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18933
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 13:26:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174376166, 174376209, 174376101, 174376051 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import of poor quality data - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174352946 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18934 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18933
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 13:25:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174376166, 174376209, 174376101, 174376051 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import of poor quality data - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174352946 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18934 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18933
bxl-forever (2025-11-08 10:53:59+00:00): Hello,

More than 536 edits on this account’s first day so far!

This looks like an undiscussed massive import, I couldn’t find any discussion about it.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Incidently, some values seem to be unlikely.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 13:26:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174376166, 174376209, 174376101, 174376051 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import of poor quality data - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174352946 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18934 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18933
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 13:26:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174376166, 174376209, 174376101, 174376051 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import of poor quality data - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174352946 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18934 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18933
NeisBot (2025-11-08 09:42:41+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "IT service company in Berlin"
NeisBot (2025-11-08 09:42:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-08 09:42:44+00:00): Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deiner Beschreibung lauten: "IT-Service-Unternehmen in Berlin"
---
(Auto-translation)
NeisReview (2025-11-08 21:19:58+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/174366231
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 13:25:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174376166, 174376209, 174376101, 174376051 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import of poor quality data - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174352946 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18934 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18933
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 13:26:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174376166, 174376209, 174376101, 174376051 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import of poor quality data - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174352946 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18934 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18933