piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2023-02-17 10:43:43+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
We welcome you as a new mapper.
I am sorry to say, but your mapping skills need to be improved.
Please pay attention to next points:
Map accurate and follow the rooflines.
Rectangular buildings often not squared with the Q key.
Connect nodes of buildings to other features.

These are all beginners errors. No problem with that. We listed them here to help you to improve your mapping skills.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132648199
Frans S (2023-02-28 17:48:48+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Each rectangular building need to be squared. !!  tab on the Q key when still selected
Nodes of buildings may not connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132648215
Frans S (2023-02-20 14:15:06+00:00): Hello. We welcome you as a new mapper.
Mapping on these dense areas like here with tall buildings might be what difficult for beginner mappers. Select an easier one to start with.

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
Langlaeufer (2023-02-17 07:11:01+00:00): GPS im Wald funktioniert meist nicht so gut. Weniger Punkte ist dann oft besser - weil einfacher zu korrigieren.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132648301
Frans S (2023-02-19 17:31:46+00:00): Hello. We welcome you as a new mapper. I am sorry to say, but you took at task, on which an experienced mapper will have his hands full. To gain experience, try some easy mapping into tasks first. If a task seems too complex, stop and select another.
Best regards.
Frans S (2023-02-19 17:32:35+00:00): Something to remember.
About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2023-02-19 12:28:29+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132648408
Frans S (2023-02-17 15:58:00+00:00): Hello Andrea.  We welcome you as a new mapper.
I noticed that you started to map one of the most difficult tasks there is on this project.
However, Most of the buildings are tall buildings which need to be mapped on a special way.
Unfortunately, I see you did your best, but it is unfortunately not mapped correctly.  It is also not a task for beginners. Even experienced mappers will have trouble with this.
Please select a more simple task to start with.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132648416
Frans S (2023-02-20 10:20:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
We welcome you as a new mapper.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
Your mappings need some improvements.
Please pay attention to next points:
Map buildings more accurate.
Square each rectangular building.
Don't connect nodes of buildings to each other or other objects.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132648493
Frans S (2023-02-18 11:51:03+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
Mapping of tall (high) buildings.  

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the roof lines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the roof lines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2023-02-28 17:46:35+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Please map more accurate by following the rooflines.
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Each rectangular building need to be squared. !!  tab on the Q key when still selected
Nodes of buildings may not connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132648502
Frans S (2023-03-07 12:18:37+00:00): Hello again. I noticed that you mapped a cluster of buildings (within a compound), as 1 building. Please map each building as a single building
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132648502
Frans S (2023-02-18 09:25:16+00:00): Maping of tall (high buildings.  


mapping of tall buildings is different from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the roof lines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the roof lines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

Best regards.
Frans S (2023-03-05 14:58:11+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key. You hardly squared a rectangular building (72 out of 78)
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132648623
maro21 (2023-02-17 19:52:33+00:00): Paczkomaty nie mają nazw [name] ani adresów. Proszę ich nie dodawać. Dodanie [name] nie wpływa na wyświetlanie na mapie, bo ten znacznik jest ignorowany, a pokazywane jest [operator] + [ref]. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity=parcel%20locker
Frans S (2023-02-25 14:46:47+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Each rectangular building need to be squared. !! 
Nodes of buildings may not connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings, which you mapped several times. 
 Each building need to be mapped individually.





Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132648715
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 15:40:46+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124785657/history has amenity = church that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by amenity=church? It seem to be not documented value and it seems to be a duplicate of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship - if you meant christian church then then it is taggable by amenity=place_of_worship religion=christian.
LeoBardonaro (2024-04-11 18:12:03+00:00): hello, it is a rectory, it belongs to a church. is it OK that way?

Thank you :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-22 12:03:45+00:00): Maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:owner would be better? (or both)

amenity=church is not really fitting if it is not church itself
user_17551983 (2023-04-01 00:48:24+00:00): hallo, was ist das problem?
dass der wald weiß gerendert wird?
hatte neulich selbst so ein problem. ;)

die froensburg ist eine innere relation, obwohl die fläche am rand liegt. das ist definitiv falsch, also löschen. 
wenndann noch weiß. dann kann man statt wald mit outer line relation, die waldfläche löschen und all seine eigenschaften der line geben, was diese dann zum wald aber ohne multipolygon relation macht (also weniger fehleranfällig).
Interteutones (2023-04-01 18:00:27+00:00): Hallo,

ja, in der Kartenansicht habe ich eine größere Fläche, welche weis ist. Normalerweise müßte diese als Wald (grün) dargestellt werden. Ich hatte mal verschiedene Dinge probiert. Aber leider erfolglos. Mit der Sache "Multipolygon" kenne ich mich nicht aus.  Scheint auch kein generelles Problem zu sein. Denn auf meinem Handy bei OSMAND sieht man die weise Fläche nicht (?)
user_17551983 (2023-04-01 18:39:35+00:00): Abend! Also der mapnik ist der Standardrenderer im Webbrowser. Wenn der nicht mehr tut, sollte man sich schon drum kümmern oder wenigstens um Hilfe fragen. Falscher Gebrauch multipolygon-eigenschaft ist leider quelle von Problemen.  Habs wie oben beschrieben bereinigt:  die außenliegende burg ist keine innen relation mehr; der wald mit multipolygon eigenschaft gelöscht und statt dessen alle infos auf seine verbleibende umrandungs line eingtragen, die damit zur waldfläche ohne MP eigenschaft wurde.  (war für mich selbst ein kleiner test, ob das problem richtig verstanden hatte.)  gruss!
Interteutones (2023-04-02 13:07:53+00:00): Hallo und Danke, dass du es richten konntest. Ich kenne mich mit den OSM-Details leider nicht aus. Nutze die Software auf aller oberster (einfachster) Ebene. Bis dato bin ich damit auch gut ausgekommen.

Grüße
Frans S (2023-02-25 16:15:15+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Each rectangular building need to be squared. !! 
Nodes of buildings may not connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.





Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
ivanbranco (2023-02-20 20:53:36+00:00): Ciao paolo,

come mai stai aggiungendo tutti questi highway=turning_circle? Dalle immagini satellitari che stai usando tu (Mapbox Satellite) non sembrano esserci, in ogni caso sono strani su un highway=path, soprattutto in questo numero.
Elvis68 (2023-03-25 12:06:32+00:00): L' ho reinserito in quanto è utile trovarlo in mappa per chi pratica mtb, non è un sentiero da DH. Anche se impegnativo è utile pubblicizzarlo per far conoscere il territorio a chi pratica escursioni in MTB.
Frans S (2023-02-28 16:58:59+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132649830
marc__marc (2023-03-17 13:20:27+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/921314039
c'est un zebra ou une surface uniforme ? la valeur actuelle est contradictoire et l'imagerie montre uun zebra blanc alors que vous avez renseigné que le marquage  est rouge
vu la source ;local knowledge je préfère vous demander au cas oü cela a changé récemement
marc__marc (2023-03-17 13:27:42+00:00): en regardant le 2ieme https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/921314041
j'ai l'impression que c'est plutot zebra:bicolour 
crossing:markings:colour=red;white
blef (2023-03-17 14:54:07+00:00): Bonjour,
Je confirme que ce sont bien des zébra blancs peints sur une surface de pavés rouges. Si je n'ai pas utilisé zébra bicolour, c'est que ce n'est pas une simple alternance de blanc et de rouge mais des bandes blanches peintes sur une  surface rouge plus large. Effectivement,  le wiki, pour marking=surface indique que le passage piétons est matérialisé "uniquement" par une surface. Donc, j'avoue ne pas trop savoir comment concilier la réalité et la syntaxe définie.
Maintenant,  je ne m'offusquerai pas si tu estimes que bicolour est plus approprié et modifies en conséquence.
marc__marc (2023-03-17 15:18:39+00:00): en effet ce que tu décris n'est pas tout a fait la meme chose que zebra:bicolour
si tu as l'occasion de faire une photo mapillar ou wikipedia common, cela m'interesse pour faire un sujet sur la liste de diffusion parlant de tag

d'ici là j'aurais inventé unne nouvelle valeur genre zebra_into_surface pour les retrouvers plutard :)
blef (2023-03-17 16:07:36+00:00): OK pour une photo, mais pas avant la fin du mois,  je suis absent jusque là
blef (2023-04-02 10:41:46+00:00): J'ai jeté un œil sur ce passage piéton et d'autres dans le secteur. Même si la surface rouge est moins large que dans mes souvenirs, elle déborde quand même des marques blanches.
De plus, je me rend compte que j'avais déjà téléversé des images sur Mapillary (en 2019):
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=43.72835746373511&lng=-1.0871249060913897&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=669656317172450
Un autre exemple ici:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=43.73006538953683&lng=-1.0927792508384755&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=4026275044133701

Bon, les photos sont pas top pour illustrer un sujet wiki. J'essaierai d'en faire des meilleures, même si aujourd'hui, les couleurs se sont un peu affadies :-(
blef (2023-04-02 10:53:38+00:00): D'autre part, pour revenir à ton premier commentaire, on pourrait argumenter que les attributs surface et surface:colour décrivent le highway=footway lui-même. L'attribut crossing:markings ne s'adressant qu'à la partie passage piéton au sens strict ne requerrait que la valeur zebra.
A réfléchir calmement.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-16 22:10:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9710932778
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10671767338
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9710932781
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9710932780
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10671767339
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9710932779
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10671767337
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9710932776
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9710932777
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056832471
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056832472
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056832476
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056832477
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056832478
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056832479
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056832474
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056832475
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056832473

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Marc_ch (2023-06-04 20:55:49+00:00): bonjour,
"batiment 40" n'est pas un nom, c'est juste une référence ref=40
un nom serrait du genre "Palais fédéral"
ou labo Marie Curry
si vous connaissez ce lieu, j'en profite pour demander votre aide à propos de quelques portes manquantes pour les 3 cages d'escalier et un bureau
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244328688
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244328692
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244334714
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244334715
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244328686
Frans S (2023-03-04 11:23:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132650338
mclennon (2023-02-16 22:33:42+00:00): I'm not sure that my change is actually correct. The street physically enter the circular motion. It is just much harder to turn left from the right lane. Nevertheless the naviagation always is one via the right lane.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-23 10:56:51+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6591201860/history has addr:housename = 400 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here - was it supposed to be addr:housenumber= ?
Frans S (2023-02-25 15:06:35+00:00): Hello. thanks for mapping on this task.
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Also solve the issues on the issue triangle before you upload your mappings.
Best regards and keep mapping
user_14547832 (2023-02-16 22:17:46+00:00): Oops! that's the wrong comment.
AndresDuhour (2023-02-22 12:27:12+00:00): Hola! los nombres de las escuelas no requieren agregar "N°" porque es una abreviatura de "número". 
Hello! school names do not require  the addition of "N°" because it is an abreviation for "number".
I corrected the name.
Regards! Andrés
VLD521 (2023-04-13 18:43:13+00:00): ¡Hola, Andrés! Muchas gracias por tu comentario. En especial, se indica para seguir una consistencia y un orden.
Un saludo.
Frans S (2023-02-19 17:22:41+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key.
mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the roof lines and also the side of a building. How do you map such a building? Map over the roof lines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint. Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

Best regards.
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-02-17 07:51:10+00:00): Hallo Radeberger,

danke für Deine Eintragungen. Zwei Dinge sind mir aufgefallen:

Gehe bitte sparsam mit access-Tags um. Wege und Straßen sind bei OSM grundsätzlich für Fußgänger:innen und Radfahrende frei. Es sollten nur die Abweichungen von den Standards erfasst werden. Und es sollte nur erfasst, was vor Ort auch ausgeschildert ist. Wenn dort steht "Zutritt nur für Kunden der DB", dann kann man foot=customers taggen. Das wird dort wahrscheinlich aber nicht stehen und man darf den Bahnsteig bestimmt auch betreten, wenn man jemanden zum Zug bringt oder dort abholt. Oder einfach nur Fotos von Zügen  machen möchte.

Und verwende bitte aussagekräftige Kommentare. "Ergänzungen", "Div. Ergänzungen", "Umfangreiche Ergänzungen" etc. sind wenig hilfreich. Den "Umfang" sieht man auch so. ;-)

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco