piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
osmidal (2024-11-09 14:31:21+00:00): Ah OK (yes, one reduncancy should have been removed, yes, the one way (your way) or the other (`sidewalk:both=separate`).

There are areas where sidewalks are mapped separately, and I think Berlin is quite strong in it to provide detailed guidance for people in need for accessibility, even when the sidewalk is like here only separated with a kerb.
Jordi MF (2024-11-08 00:47:17+00:00): Hola,

¿Puedes indicar qué documentación demuestra el uso de los nombres en castellano de Campo de Turia, el Lavador y Acequia de los Huertos en Vilamarxant?

Saludos
juicyarp (2024-11-08 09:20:11+00:00): El nombre "Cl. Acequia Huertos" aparece en la dirección del Ayuntamiento de Villamarchante: https://www.vilamarxant.es/es/pagina/servicios-publicos

Respecto a "Lavador", tras buscar bien no encuentro ninguna referencia, así que lo he eliminado.
Jordi MF (2024-11-08 09:26:13+00:00): Yo no eliminaría la etiqueta name:es, sino que la nombraría como 'name:es=Plaza del Llavador'.
Saludos
juicyarp (2024-11-08 09:31:36+00:00): Me parece bien. El nombre "Plaza del Llavador" también aparece en una búsqueda en Google, así que parece que hay gente usándolo.
Glassman (2024-11-08 02:38:54+00:00): ¿Puede explicar por qué eliminó tantas características del campo de golf?

in English:
Can you explain why you deleted so many features of the golf course?
RaquelSlope (2024-11-08 07:38:01+00:00): Because there were certain elements that did not match the current state of the field.
Glassman (2024-11-08 17:16:56+00:00): Instead of removing the features, just adjust the feature. That way the history of the object is preserved.

Since you have been updating other features of the golf course, I assume you will be fixing these holes as well. Good luck.
eggie (2024-11-07 16:31:41+00:00): Dag Johan,  Het zou zomaar kunnen, maar er lopen wel fietspaden naartoe.
Welk bord staat hier vooraan?

G7 geeft een footway aan
G11, 12a  G13 geeft een fietspad aan.
Geen bebording dan highway=path en daar mag je wel of niet fietsen.
Staat er geen fietsverbod dan mag je er fietsen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-11-07 16:47:57+00:00): Dit is wel heel wonderlijk bebord.
Wanneer er een gootje zit bij die trappen dan ramp:bicycle=yes
evt met bicycle=dismount

https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=51.824091447&lng=4.823695421&z=19
Vanaf de Buitendams G7 en vanaf de Peulenlaan G11 ? en dan halverwege G12a (bromfietspad)
Tja wat is wijsheid?
eggie (2024-11-07 17:02:07+00:00): Johan,
Ik heb wat aangepast met bicycle=dismount  (afstappen)  zodat het routeert voor de fietser en gootjes toegevoegd aan de trappen. Ook aansluitingen ontbraken nog naar Jupiterstraat en Uranusstraat. 
Daarom zal het wel deels een fietspad zijn. 
Van de  bebording klopt weinig.
Groet
eggie
Johan de Ruiter (2024-11-18 12:45:09+00:00): Eggie,

Eens dat het niet helemaal duidelijk is, qau bebording. Gemeente geeft aan dat het niet de bedoeling is dat er wordt gefietst op de brug. Zoals het nu staat in osm lijkt mij goed.
eggie (2024-11-07 16:34:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

I don't think this is a wildeness_hut 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dwilderness_hut

Please don't add addressinfo to building_shapes.

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-11-07 16:37:29+00:00): reverted by changeset #158863479
RedAuburn (2024-11-07 15:35:20+00:00): src website
DeFra85 (2025-09-28 10:09:47+00:00): Hej TerraRanger_WU,
du hast hier bei etlichen Wegen das highway=path entfernt weil die Wege nicht mehr genutzt werden sollen. Wurden diese auch vor Ort entsprechend "blockiert" mit Schildern, Toren, Holzschnitt, etc. ?

Und auf manche Wege hast du eine zeitliche Zugangsbeschränkung gesetzt und trotzdem das highway=path gelöscht, sodass sie nicht mehr sichtbar sind. ???
BCNorwich (2024-11-07 18:00:43+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've tweaked the address to suit OSM practice and squared up the shape.

Regards Bernard
JuanjoMC (2024-11-07 20:16:59+00:00): Hi,
would you be so kind as to explain what is the point of splitting land use polygons into adjacent, smaller ones of the same type?
FYI, data validation tools do complain in such cases.

Also, what is the purpose of those tiny 'bridges' linking different polygons together like, for example, this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=50.912951&mlon=4.376137#map=19/50.913062/4.376217

Thanks
Tom Ameye (2024-11-09 14:47:56+00:00): Dear Juan,
These clarify the building and property lines and clarify the boundaries of public versus private space. The ‘bridges’ will disappear over time.
Kind regards,
Tom
RaphaelPasloin (2024-11-12 09:05:12+00:00): Hello Tom Ameye,

Also the questions behind that is the common pratice about landuse in Belgium and in this area.

For Belgium here is a quick data calculation i have made for landuse=residential

Average: 2.13 ha
Median: 0.49 ha

Landuse is a "global concept" that reflect what is in majority in a area not to parcel in multiple contigus zone.

From the wiki (french part sorry) : " Le tag landuse est principalement utilisé pour des zones de taille importante, et pas à l'échelle de la parcelle " https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential

The common pratice actualy in Brussels (and from my sample also for Belgium) is to map a simple global area : like here : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30163554 or to map  a "block beetween 4 street" like here : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157392569

Creating individual contigus landuse is not what the majority of mappers do , and personaly i consider that a bad pratice (and not saying about creating a lot of duplicated nodes and crossing landuse with building , that is considered to be a mistake).

Also that raise an another concern : mapping individual parcel (or assimiled too) is contrevertial see : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Parcel

Making tunnel even temporary is also not recommanded. 

I think with my comment it's the third time that other user warm you about this and i have also see other mappers merging your cut in landuse , so on long term a waste of your time.

Can you please reconsider the way you map landuse in this area ? 

Have a good day.
Raphaël
gurglypipe (2024-11-07 16:20:22+00:00): Also add some missing service roads/building passages along Stramongate, and roughly adjust the terraced building shape to accommodate them. This terrace needs a lot more work, but I don’t plan on doing that now.
Henry572 (2024-11-10 19:14:09+00:00): Hallo FACODIC,
Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und danke für deine erste Bearbeitung :)
Ich habe noch ergänzt, dass das Gebäude sich erst im Bau befindet. Auf der Webseite (hier verlinkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3563494) klingt es eher nach einem Bürogebäude. Oder weißt du etwas anderes?
Viele Grüße,
Hendrik
Flynn_ (2025-01-14 14:39:34+00:00): I know that Saint Helena, Ascension, and Tristan da Cunha have some weird names but this seems a bit suspicious. I can't find any other reference to this name. Do you have any source for this name being in common or local usage?
Flynn_ (2025-01-24 09:28:58+00:00): In lieu of a response, I have removed this from the map.

If you have any objections and can provide sources for this feature's existence, you are welcome to say so.

Since this was your first edit, might I suggest that you start with the more conventional route of editing your local area? You will likely already know a great deal of detail and it should be an easier and more productive start than a remote island in the Atlantic.

In addition to the iD editor (the web-based software you used to add this peak), I can also highly recommend StreetComplete for improving your local area: https://streetcomplete.app/
meongseolin (2024-11-07 17:04:33+00:00): 至此，北京中心城区的乡级行政区边界业已完成
Beachmiles (2024-11-07 18:25:28+00:00): Sorry I think I shouldn't have deleted this as it may be an on ramp for the other side of the street
divaddivag (2024-11-08 05:45:49+00:00): Nice description of your feelings rather than a name! Feel free to express your concerns by commenting openly on the corresponding changeset, this is how we do around here. Happy mapping. David
Aim311_ (2024-11-12 19:24:04+00:00): Cześć. W edycji zrobiłeś kilka błędów. 
1. przykład: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1331673294 nie sklejamy zagospodarowania terenu z drogami, ścieżkami, ciekami wodnymi..
2. dlaczego urzynałeś płoty pomiędzy ogrodami działkowymi? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1331657302
W wyniku twojej edycji charakterystycznej dla początkującego edytora nastąpiła znaczna utrata informacji oraz i utrudniłeś robienie kolejnych edycji innym edytorom.
Aim311_ (2024-11-12 19:43:20+00:00): Dzięki za edycję. Po sprawdzeniu ze stanem wcześniejszym okazał się, że dodałeś sporo szczegółów. Sorry za wcześniejszy komentarz. Pozdrawiam.
Tomasz Buchholz (2024-11-13 11:35:17+00:00): Cześć, skleiłem zagospodarowanie terenu z ciekiem wodnym, żeby utworzyć relacje zamkniętego multipoligonu RODu. Z zasadą "One feature, one OSM element" nie chciałem tworzyć dodatkowej zamkniętej linii dla obszaru i osobnych linii dla cieku wodnego i dla ogrodzenia. Wykorzystałem linie ogrodzenia i cieku wodnego do utworzenia granicy RODu.

Czy jest lepszy sposób na to?
Tomasz Buchholz (2024-11-13 11:36:55+00:00): Jestem też ciekaw w jaki sposób znalazłeś moje zmiany. Czy zobaczyłeś je na mapie?
Aim311_ (2024-11-13 20:51:01+00:00): Generalnie jest dobrze. Dodałeś sporo szczegółów, co spostrzegłem porównując ze stanem wcześniejszym. Wizualnie na pierwszy rzut oka wszystko jest w porządku.
Wydaje mi się ze sposób mapowania, jaki tutaj zastosowałeś jest wystarczający dla obiektów, które przez lata mają ten sam charakter w tym przypadku obszar ROD. Jednak łączenie linii z obszarami nie jest właściwą praktyką, ponieważ utrudnia dodawania i modyfikowanie szczegółów w późniejszym okresie.

"nie chciałem tworzyć dodatkowej zamkniętej linii dla obszaru i osobnych linii dla cieku wodnego i dla ogrodzenia" wydaje mi się ze w projekcie nie musimy się aż tak bardzo ograniczać z wielkością bazy danych.

Moim zdaniem edytowanie powinno być jak najbardziej intuicyjne, czyli to, co widzę rysuję, wybieram typ obiektu, zapisuję i gotowe, komplikowanie mapowania za pomocą relacji uważam ze przerost formy nad treścią. Relacje łatwo uszkodzić co niestety odczułem w postaci kilku reprymend i potrzebie poprawiania edycji po mnie bo edytory nie wykrywały problemów z relacjami, tak więc w codziennym mapowaniu ograniczam relacje do niezbędnego minimum.
eggie (2024-11-08 09:03:02+00:00): Dag JohnnyWvD

name heb ik aangepast naar description.
Ook zo'n regeltje. Geen name tag gebruiken om iets te beschrijven.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-11-08 09:05:12+00:00): tag power=substation toegevoegd
OsmAnd_Pieter (2024-11-18 13:59:30+00:00): Hi, the arboretum is now tagged aa garden, not sure if it was you who I need to talk to. Now with the element set to garden we do nolonger see the green grass areas along the creeks that pass through the forest. Yes it is OSM technically a garden (arboretum), but with the previous setting to managed forest at least there was additional visual info on what where the sunny paths were. Check kleineflossendelleweg for an example how it was in the past.
Tom Ameye (2024-11-19 09:14:07+00:00): Hi Pieter,
I have no recollection changing it to garden. Feel free to modify and improve.
Best regards,
Tom
SD Mapman (2024-11-09 22:26:35+00:00): That's public access? I was always too nervous to check it out.
pallindo (2024-11-11 20:19:53+00:00): I came down spearfish mountain this way and didn't see any signs that it was private.  When I get back that way again I could double check.
Jacopo (2025-08-07 12:58:03+00:00): Ciao
Ho notato che hai inserito la località "Giunglabuca". Non l'ho mai sentita, avresti una fonte per questo nome?
Grazie
Jacopo
Yunkers (2024-11-07 20:37:21+00:00): Wycofałem twoje ostatnie zmiany bo są oczywistymi wandalizmami.
whb (2024-11-14 10:08:54+00:00): Guten Tag,

gibt es bei dieser Toilette irgendwelche Beschränkungen?

Viele Grüße
whb
Highfidelity (2024-11-14 14:13:34+00:00): Toilette ist zugänglich ebenerdig im Foyee des Metroplis Kino
keine Zugangsbeschränkung während normaler Öffnungszeiten des Kino
Barrierefrei zugänglich
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-07 20:38:19+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and changesets, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
NeisBot (2024-11-07 20:38:59+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and changesets, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-08 06:43:46+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158882706
Luzandro (2025-06-13 04:30:52+00:00): Hallo,
siehe www.openstreetmap.org/note/4802193
luca zacca (2026-01-19 14:20:29+00:00): salve, scusate non so se è il canale giusto, non sono pratico.
Ho notato un percorso con id 128918856, etichettato come strada agraria, che attualmente non esiste. Ho visto che almeno da un lato è chiusa con reti accroccate e legate con della corda. Lascerebbe pensare quindi che è una strada privata. Avete modo di capire se è così?
Dino Michelini (2026-01-21 16:19:16+00:00): Sicuramente è una strada bianca poderale in disuso. Per essere mappata con access=private non bastano "reti accroccate" collocate chissà da chi e per quale motivo (magari è solo un modo per dissuadere qualcuno che scaricava calcinacci…), ma occorre conoscere la proprietà della strada (se pubblica, interpoderale o privata), ovvero, fare una ricerca sul catasto e verificare se esistono diritti di passaggio. Comunque, secondo il Codice civile e penale e la giurisprudenza l’interdizione dell’accesso ad aree private in assenza di cancelli, deve essere sempre evidenziato da cartelli o muri, recinzioni con 5 fili spinati (se i fili spinati sono solo 3 l'accesso è consentito ai pedoni)., quindi, di per sé le "reti accroccate" non sono sufficienti per apporre il tag access=private.
Dino Michelini (2026-01-22 10:15:01+00:00): Comunque se la “rete posticcia” impedisce l’accesso metterei un waypoint barrier (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier e https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Key_descriptions_for_group_%22barriers%22) con specificato il tipo di barriere e il tipo di  accessi consentiti (per capirci ciò che riesce a passare… pedone, bicicletta, autoveicolo, ecc.)
NeisBot (2024-11-07 20:39:03+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and changesets, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-08 06:43:35+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158882699
Noon & Moon (2024-11-07 18:53:22+00:00): Dit klopt
eggie (2024-11-07 20:05:52+00:00): Welkom bij OSM..
Review
..website=  begint altijd met http... in osm format.

Mvg
eggie
eggie (2024-11-07 20:24:33+00:00): format aangepast naar 
https://www.noonandmoon.nl/
StreetSurveyor (2024-11-16 22:34:59+00:00): This driveway was tagged/unnamed correctly. It only services 9 Gray Garden East.
StreetSurveyor (2024-11-16 22:41:32+00:00): Although the city map does show this as an actual road. I think your edits were accurate aside from a minor misspelling which I cleaned up. Happy mapping!
frosm (2024-11-23 07:56:47+00:00): Bonjour,
pourriez-vous faire attention aux erreurs que signale le validateur ?
par exemple ajouter les nœuds manquant quand une voie croise une autre par exemple https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1331691733
surtout que cela se corrige en 2 clics :)
TrickyFoxy (2024-11-08 18:35:08+00:00): 👋 
W=M-net
https://osm.org/relation/16761125/history

What did you mean?
JeroenvanderGun (2024-11-11 17:02:37+00:00): Ah, I see I accidentally changed the tag brand=M-net to W=M-net. I've corrected it now.
Firefishy (2024-11-07 21:10:24+00:00): The ESRI World Imagery background imagery layer is higher detail and it could be helpful to get more accurate outlines of the building. Happy mapping :-)
ZABuild (2024-11-07 21:26:42+00:00): Thank you for pointing me to the right map background.

Under Esri, it looks like my shapes are too high.

I am unable to select an area and shift it down.

Suggestions to move the shape?
AndresDuhour (2026-01-14 11:50:14+00:00): Buen día! Quería consultar si se puede confirmar que las dos calles paralelas se llaman Las Acacias. Muchas gracias!
Andrés
GustavoE (2024-12-15 02:30:20+00:00): Hola, con respecto a la numeración de las puertas en cada espigón, las que agregaste no coinciden con las oficiales y estan desactualizadas con la nueva identificación que les dio la concesionaria del Aeropuerto Nuevo Pudahuel.
PeachyOne (2024-12-08 15:41:19+00:00): Why was the Greek name removed from the name tag in the process?
mcliquid (2024-11-09 15:14:37+00:00): On the sign, "(Austria)" is not written at all. "destination:country=;A" is already set for the small symbol - why create it redundantly?
vmicho (2025-11-18 19:18:28+00:00): Hi. Yeah that's right, fixed ;)
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-07 21:30:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3214521247
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12321335058
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1331704003
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176590004

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
syntex (2025-07-03 23:18:01+00:00): Naprawione
ilias_ (2024-11-08 00:16:18+00:00): Excellent
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-07 20:41:08+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Świętego Wawrzyńca":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137030263
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137030283
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137030300
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137035248
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137035269
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137035293
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137035321
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137035443
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137035461
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137035480
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137035544
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137035563
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137035586
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137035604
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137035622
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137035934
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137035948
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137035958
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137035966
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137035976
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137035984
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137035988
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137035997
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137036010
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137036018
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137036022
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137036034
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137036045
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137036055
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137036100
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137036111
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137036122
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137036137
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137036256
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137036318
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137036326
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137036389
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137036484
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137036570
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137036846
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137036911

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
TrickyFoxy (2024-11-10 13:01:58+00:00): Сомнительно. Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158966637
woodpeck_repair (2024-11-22 10:02:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159451278 where the changeset comment is: revert 'playful' addition of power lines, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16896
Taktaal (2025-05-08 21:50:41+00:00): I have reverted this change because it made the map quality significantly worse

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166004406
VictorIE (2024-11-08 13:08:44+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12321453984

The road isn't joined up here and is generally a git confused.
BCNorwich (2024-11-09 07:32:58+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Requested review, I think you should study the beginners and help sections before making more edits.

Unfortunately, your mapping mostly duplicated highways, which disrupted routing. Thus, I've reverted the whole changeset. 

If you need help please ask.

Regards Bernard.
woodpeck_repair (2024-11-22 10:02:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159451278 where the changeset comment is: revert 'playful' addition of power lines, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16896
woodpeck_repair (2024-11-22 10:02:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159451278 where the changeset comment is: revert 'playful' addition of power lines, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16896
woodpeck_repair (2024-11-22 10:02:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159451278 where the changeset comment is: revert 'playful' addition of power lines, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16896
woodpeck_repair (2024-11-22 10:02:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159451278 where the changeset comment is: revert 'playful' addition of power lines, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16896