piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 13:09:36+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 152542111.
puchaczowsky (2025-01-10 19:13:45+00:00): stacje paliw umieszczamy w miejscu dystrybutorów, a nie w budynku sklepu, zapoznaj się z:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity=fuel?uselang=pl
Marek-M (2025-01-10 19:42:25+00:00): @puchaczowsky - nie znam tej reguły o tym, że amenity=fuel ma być przy dystrybutorach i nie znalazłem tego zapisu w Wiki.

Osobiście zawsze daję go właśnie na budynku sklepu, bo ten zazwyczaj jest pojedynczym obiektem a punkty z dystrybutorami bywają rozsiane po całym terenie stacji - jak wtedy wybrać odpowiednie miejsce dla znacznika?

Jak dla mnie ta edycja jest OK.
MKLK (2025-01-10 20:40:46+00:00): Zgodnie z Wiki dodawanie amenity=fuel na zadaszeniu dystrybutorów jest rzadszym sposobem tagowania. Sposób tagowania nie jest jednak poprawny z innego powodu. Wiki podaje, że amenity=fuel "zaznaczamy węzeł w centrum stacji paliwowej lub obszar zajmowany przez stację", a przestrzega przed zamieszczaniem go na budynku sklepu. Uwaga więc zasadna. 

Przeniosłem stację na węzeł.
Marek-M (2025-01-10 20:57:22+00:00): Może być i tak, chociaż centrum stacji jest mało precyzyjnym określeniem. Gdyby dystrybutory znajdowałyby się również po wschodniej stronie, za sklepem, to ten węzeł i tak wypadałby na budynek sklepu. Poza tym, czy budynek sklepu, który jest kluczowym miejscem na stacjach paliw, nie przesuwa tutaj środka stacji paliw tak gdzieś pomiędzy dystrybutorami i sklepem?

Zasadniczo to nie ma wielkiego znaczenia, czy `amenity=fuel` wrzucimy na sklep, na zadaszenie, na obszar lub jako węzeł w obrębie stacji - najważniejsze jest, żeby nie był on powielony w obrębie jednej stacji, bo to jest dość częsty błąd.
MKLK (2025-01-10 21:06:45+00:00): Wiki z jakiegoś powodu zabrania wrzucania na sklep, ale co do powielania w pełni się zgadzam.
puchaczowsky (2025-01-10 21:12:21+00:00): ja wolę wrzucać na zadaszenie pod którym jest po prostu najwięcej dystrybutorów, umieszczając na budynku zasłania ewentualne POI, które mogą się w nim znajdować
Marek-M (2025-01-10 21:42:33+00:00): Ale Wiki nie zabrania wrzucania na budynek sklepu, tylko podaje dwa sposoby, które można, jak wyżej wytłumaczyłem, interpretować na różne sposoby. Nie ma o co tutaj się spierać, najważniejsza zasada to nie duplikować i tyle. Pozdrawiam :⁠-⁠)
MKLK (2025-01-11 13:03:18+00:00): Otóż to. Pozdrawiam.
HirschKauz (2024-06-11 20:14:38+00:00): ah crap - sorry für den typo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152542863
Piotr Strębski (2024-06-17 17:16:20+00:00): Hej, usunąłem ten szlaban - jako, że go nie ma wcale (https://openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/152777154). Może jest w planach, nie wiem, ale nie wychodźmy w przyszłość. Pozdrawiania.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-11 13:20:28+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291323172

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Friendly_Ghost (2024-06-11 15:39:50+00:00): I've reverted this changeset because this user is a sockpuppet that keeps vandalising the map of Gaza.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152549413
Frans S (2024-06-17 12:22:37+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
However, Highrise buildings are incorrect mapped. See attachment.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152543308
mavl (2024-06-12 05:20:18+00:00): Здравствуйте. В комментарии к пакету правок указано, что это импорт. Напишите, пожалуйста, подробнее, что это за импорт и из какого источника он выполнен. Как вы, наверное, знаете, при импорте нужно придерживаться рекомендаций по импорту.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%98%D0%BC%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%82/%D0%A0%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B8
Vaultek (2024-06-15 11:01:46+00:00): Здравствуйте, живу здесь в данный момент, импортирую с карты, присланной госорганом местного управления, все остальные мелкие правки связаны с знанием местных условий
mavl (2024-06-15 11:29:01+00:00): Ясно. Спасибо. У любой карты есть правообладатель, даже если карта выслана госорганом. У вас есть разрешение от этого правообладателя на использование его карты в целях уточнения OpenStreetMap?  
  
Если разрешения нет, то вы не можете из неё в OpenStreetMap что-то импортировать. Ведь вам госорган прислал карту для личных целей, а не для уточнения карты, которая доступна для всех бесплатно.  
  
Если разрешение есть, то вышлите его, пожалуйста, на адрес data@osmfoundation.org
WoSoe (2024-06-12 04:52:45+00:00): Moin!

Hab mal die Punktverschiebung vom Wohngebiet rückgängig gemacht.
Nehme an das ist unabsichtlich passiert.

Deine Änderung:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=152544397

Meine Rücksetzung:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=152569049

Gruß WoSoe
Robert-B (2024-06-12 05:01:43+00:00): Vielen Dank 
Bitte um Entschuldigung. Da muss ich wohl etwas vorsichtiger sein
NicaTopo (2024-06-11 14:12:45+00:00): Hi VM,

There is no clear indication of a building on Bing maps and your shapes are too big. Please add only verified building and size them according to the satellite imagery.

I'm going to delete them all, I'm sorry.
NicaTopo (2024-06-11 14:20:46+00:00): Joy, 
Your building shapes are far too big! Please match the satellite imagery.
Thank you
Road–Runner (2024-06-11 22:18:59+00:00): Hallo. Mir ist hier kein Kunstzentrum bekannt. Gibt es das dort wirklich?
Gnrl27 (2024-06-12 08:52:35+00:00): Hallo, 
Es ist der Sitz unserer Musikgruppe. Konnte keine passendere Kategorie finden. 

https://www.facebook.com/LawinesCentral


Mfg Lawines
Road–Runner (2024-06-12 17:53:36+00:00): ok danke, habs korrigiert
Gnrl27 (2024-06-13 07:56:13+00:00): Danke!
pantufla (2024-09-19 20:58:12+00:00): mil gracias por añadir datos de MTB a Collsersola, has hecho un gran trabajo. Me gustaría colaborar contigo!
pantufla (2024-09-19 20:58:25+00:00): Yo suelo hacer MTB por la zona
eggie (2024-06-11 14:48:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Dit is niet helemaal correct. Fiets-Knooppunt 62 staat al op de kaart .. alleen een eindje verder. 
Bewerken van fiets- en wandelroutes kan overigens niet goed met editor iD.  Wel met Josm.
Nu l
https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=17.0/51.5247/3.651
Omdat de andere routes 5 - 62 en 61-62 op het al bestaande knooppunt uitkomen dat het beter daar blijven. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-06-11 14:52:31+00:00): reverted by changeset #152547378

Ik heb het wandelknooppunt hersteld. 
Het fietsknooppunt maakt al deel uit van het netwerk. 

MVG
eggie
MxxCon (2024-06-18 01:11:02+00:00): Hello.
This changeset will be reverted in full.
As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description this tag MUST NEVER be used for promotional messaging of advertising. It MUST be neutral tone description of a given feature. It MUST NOT contain address of phone numbers! There are dedicated tags for that!
Both wikidata and wikipedia articles for the whole concept of pain management, NOT your business, therefore it is inappropriate to include them.
name= tag MUST NOT contain location description. It is part of the address tags and by the fact that this node is located IN Brooklyn.
Your edit intentionally damaged opening_hours tag! This tag has a specific format and syntax which MUST BE followed.
Due to all these problems this edit will be reverted in full.
You are welcome to make legit and valid edits to OSM. However, if you continue to make blatant SEO spam edits, your account will be referred to DWG, which can result in temporary or permanent account ban.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152545465
Warin61 (2024-06-12 01:16:03+00:00): Nearmap is not compatable with OSM licence conditions
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NearMap_PhotoMaps

Reverted.
aTarom (2024-06-11 14:53:09+00:00): Hola Ipintza, encuentro este tag pero no se bien bien como arreglarlo
"roof:levels0.5"="0.75"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291342690/history
cuando puedas le das un vistazo porfa
saludos y gracias por editar
literan (2024-06-12 13:10:17+00:00): зачем удалили тип дома (apartments)?

это вандализм
Gazer75 (2024-11-25 06:07:38+00:00): Please don't mess with the bus stops in Norway. They are updated automatically and we dont use the public transportation tags. Many of them don't even have a platform so the public_transport=platform tag is wrong.
trial (2024-10-09 16:16:39+00:00): Bonjour, par rapport à https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1010342324, il y a peut-être une source disponible plus précise : les cartes du Shom montre les deux circuits qui ne sont pas toujours parallèles.
https://diffusion.shom.fr/donnees/base-de-donnees-maritimes-et-littorales/cables.html date par contre de 2018 :-(

https://data.shom.fr/datacontext/fr/1728490543318-188185 (non utilisable car soumise à copyright)
Ignatych (2024-07-16 12:45:36+00:00): Добрый день. Узунларовский сельсовет https://osm.org/relation/7907905 удалён случайно?
Uralla (2024-07-16 13:07:47+00:00): Добрый. Я в пакете правок что-то даже не вижу где он был удалён, хотя история показывает именно на него. Не могу понять как пофиксить. Если есть возможность это сделать, то было бы хорошо.
literan (2024-06-12 13:09:26+00:00): слово "Деревня" лишнее
akimapbuilder (2024-06-12 06:27:09+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since there is no building in sight.
NeisBot (2024-06-11 14:54:25+00:00): Hi Maeva0705, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1291353290

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-15 13:37:05+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152722003
chris66 (2025-02-20 14:28:48+00:00): Hi, du hattest die Springorumtrasse auf "Baustelle" gestellt, ist die noch nicht fertig?

Grüße
akimapbuilder (2024-06-12 06:27:43+00:00): Try to match building geometry from satellite imagery.  Thanks!
Sakari_N (2024-07-25 13:25:49+00:00): Moi, ja tervetuloa openstreetmappiin! 

Karttaan olisi varmaan paras lisätä tila/paikka, missä aa-tapaamisia pidetään. Ajattelisin että tila on pysyvä, ja tapaaminen on taas tilassa tapahtuva asia, joka ei sinällään ole oikein karttaan kuuluva.

Jos tiedät tilan nimen niin voin myös muokkailla sen kartalle.
Gertjan Idema (2024-07-07 10:06:03+00:00): Beste FSC73,
Voor de schuurtjes bij Zandweg 205B, C en D heb je het pand Id (ref:bag) van  schuurtje 205A gebruikt. Zou je dat kunnen aanpassen? De juiste nummers kan je vinden op https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/

Met vriendelijke groet,
Gertjan Idema
5m4u9 (2024-06-11 19:49:45+00:00): hola, gracias por actualizar la farmacia. Hice algunas correcciones en la dirección que normalmente es solo el nombre de la calle.
Nonichase (2025-07-04 17:46:12+00:00): 温州南动车所应该在铁路东侧吧，现在貌似只把地平了出来，还立了个项目部的门头，西侧的这块地应该就是普通的存车场
Warin61 (2024-06-12 01:15:48+00:00): Nearmap is not compatable with OSM licence conditions
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NearMap_PhotoMaps

Reverted.
woodpeck (2024-07-19 15:35:30+00:00): Please do not abuse the "name" tag to place messages on the map. If these are military areas that have a name then put these names in the "name" tag - "currently controlled by X" is not an appropriate name tag. 

On a separate note, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1285442977 is inside Armenia. Why does it have to be pointed out that it is controlled by Armenia?
Khidistavi (2024-07-19 16:44:14+00:00): 1) I believe this should be discussed by the local community, since this is not my initiative and I myself consider such a designation questionable. For lack of a better solution, I just returned the existing status quo.

2) for ref: The territory you indicated was part of the Azerbaijan SSR and is de jure an exclave of Azerbaijan, but controlled by Armenia.
emersonveenstra (2024-06-13 17:36:34+00:00): Hi,

You created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291363506 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291363508 with no tags, could you please go back and tag them? Thanks!
Nonichase (2025-07-04 17:36:41+00:00): “苍南动车所”有误，应该为“苍南存车场”
bxl-forever (2024-06-11 20:57:28+00:00): Hello,

I reviewed your latest edits.
I am afraid to inform you that we have a real problem with this MapRoulette task.  We already informed the author of this task that it triggers a very large number of false-positives.

I also inform you that in the city of Brussels, Belgium, we have a full inventory of all building outlines.  With other local mappers we have put a lot of care in drawing building shapes correctly, by combining government data and our own surveys.  Yes, some buildings do have spikes.  Yes, it is normal.  And sadly, MapRoulette users are not fixing anything.  On the contrary, they are destroying years of patient work we put here.  This is also why we do not use aerial imagery to map buildings, and definitely not in the iD editor.

I appreciate the intentions you have to fix the map.  Maybe there are other places in the world where mappers’ time is wanted, but please consider pausing your edits in our city because of this problem.  I’ll care to revert the faulty edits.

Have a nice day.
SK@ (2024-06-12 22:13:50+00:00): I see it now! I'm sorry I didn't see this sooner. As I stated in my other message I'll go thru them all and clean up just give me a day or two to get thru them all. Thanks for reaching out: it's all about the map.
Henry572 (2024-06-11 20:16:59+00:00): Hallo WerstensWichtelin78,
Sieht gut aus! Danke fürs Aktualisieren.
Viele Grüße, Hendrik
VictorIE (2024-06-19 08:12:27+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291371141

Does the dentist occupy 4 buildings?

Note that the buildings are double mapped?
Udarian (2024-06-11 23:20:11+00:00): next time can you leave a change set comment describing what you did, something like "updated multi-storey at Jungle Island" would have worked well enough for this commit; for more information see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments .
literan (2024-06-12 11:39:28+00:00): кривой адрес (на их сайте другие), попали в военное учреждение. Откат
eggie (2024-06-11 15:56:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback   Elk begin is moeilijk. Dit is niet helemaal goed gegaan. Er liggen nu twee wegen op elkaar. Je bedoeling is vast om een fietsverbinding te maken met een lijnelement highway=cycleway?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-06-11 16:01:23+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast met een fietspad.
MVG
eggie
literan (2024-06-12 11:41:44+00:00): это не общеобразовательная школа, кривой тег применили. Я исправлю, но если будете упорствовать (не будет реакции на замечания), правки будут откатываться
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-08-18 04:12:42+00:00): note: adding name=Shelter to shelters is not needed

see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11972512308/history

OsmAnd interface is misleading, see https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/18651 - you should not add name in such cases
Peter Van Geit (2024-08-30 04:59:57+00:00): Understood Mateusz. Thanks
Frans S (2024-06-16 09:15:30+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not cluster buildings.
Each building need to be mapped separately.
Best regards
Warin61 (2024-06-12 01:11:02+00:00): Nearmap is not compatable with OSM licence conditions
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NearMap_PhotoMaps

Reverted.
Merlin13245 (2024-06-11 19:18:38+00:00): Are there multiple apartment complexes in this area that belong to "Brookfield Management", or is it all the same complex?

A more accurate depiction might be to change this "residential" area to an "Apartment complex" and merge it with the node you created in changeset 152551295 to give it the right name. Then set an "operator" tag on the area to "Brookfield Mangement".
bptapartments (2024-06-12 05:26:03+00:00): This is multiple apartment complexes in this area that belong to "Brookfield Management", but there is an office "Botsford Place Terrace Apartments" in it.
eggie (2024-06-11 17:04:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Het lijkt me niet correct. Je hebt de gebouwen van vorm veranderd. Het is nu één groot gebouw geworden. Is hier een nieuw gebouw gekomen. 
Het was hier al correct getagd. Helaas rendert club=sport nog niet op de standaardkaart.
Ik kan de adresnode evt als clubhuis taggen.
Er is een vlak sports_centre zonder naam en sport?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-06-11 17:09:04+00:00): Ik zie geen spoor van een gebouw zoals je het hebt ingetekend. De foto is van 19 mei jl.
Ik pas even wat aan hier.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-06-11 17:11:43+00:00): Ik heb het gebouw verwijderd en het originele gebouw teruggeplaatst.
De club zal straks zichtbaar zijn op de adresnode. De club was daar al aan toegevoegd door een medemapper.  
MVG
eggie
stillhart (2026-03-07 15:21:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11972575981/history

is that really a destination charger?
NeisBot (2024-06-11 16:39:25+00:00): Hi Bzyq86, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1291386540

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
JPF_pt (2024-09-12 02:04:28+00:00): Hi,
Why did you add this roundabout if there is none here (nor any road construction in place)?
This have severe impact on the end map for users!!
Thanks.
[PT]
Olá,
Qual o motivo para teres adicionado este segmento de rotunda onda ela não existe, nem sequer há qualquer obra no local?
Sabes que estas edições têm impacto no mapa usado por uma série de pessoas e apps, certo?
Obrigado.
MdCz (2024-09-12 07:04:22+00:00): Good Morning,

This is the app i used to make that particular edit: 

Street­Complete (OpenStreetMap surveyor app)
https://f-droid.org/packages/de.westnordost.streetcomplete/

Unfortunately, something has to have gone horribly wrong... I have no idea why or how that roundabout came to appear, but it definitely dosent belong there. Whats clear is that its my edit so I cant blame the app for not double checking.
Im sorry for the inconvenience.

Thank you for commenting.
Spearfish7424 (2024-06-11 16:50:37+00:00): (The redundant CanVec data will be deleted in about hour. It's necessary to wait about an hour to avoid hitting any changeset limits.)
citrula (2024-06-11 19:58:23+00:00): Can you explain the issue you were experiencing? It looks like you deleted a service road, was that showing as Guadalupe in some software that you use?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152552710
Marosso (2024-06-11 20:05:03+00:00): Guadalupe had a misplaced point that cut into the neighborhood to its right, making it weirdly shaped and incorrect on the map. There was a few streets connected to that point, so I might have removed one by accident when trying to correct the error and making the road straight.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152552710
felipeeugenio (2024-06-12 00:06:56+00:00): Hola
Si conoces la zona, puedes agregarle tanto a las calles como portones sus restricciones de acceso

Access=private si acaso son sectores privados
aceess=permissive si acaso son privados, pero en verdad están abiertos para la circulación libre, pero el dueño puede cerrar la puerta cuando quiera. Asi pasa en varios condominios.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152553009
v4g0 (2024-06-12 08:14:11+00:00): Añadiré esa información progresivamente.
Merlin13245 (2024-06-11 19:14:43+00:00): Hi DiamondbackGold! Your changes to the map look fantastic - but your comment isn't very descriptive as to the changes you made. Good changeset comments leave a good record of not only what was changed, but why - and they also help reviewers identify possible issues.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more information.

A good comment for your change might be "Adjusting putting greens to more accurately reflect their actual position". 

Thanks for contributing to the map, and happy mapping!
GerdP (2024-07-11 05:32:51+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Kannst Du den Weg https://www.osm.org/way/812394848
noch mal anschauen. Da hat jemand vor Dir ein access=private dran gehängt, aber der Weg ist Teil der Knotenpunkt-Route https://www.osm.org/relation/11354273
Verläuft die Route anders oder ist der Weg z.B. nur als "Privatweg" ausgeschildert (also ownership=private)?
GerdP (2024-07-11 05:34:32+00:00): Nachtrag: Da ist sogar ein explizites bicycle=no dran.
Schramme (2024-07-11 09:08:48+00:00): Hallo. Das widerspricht sich an der Stelle. Ich hab das extra nicht gemappt, weil ich da auch gerne lang düse. Es steht ein Schild Privatweg, VZ 254, VZ 259 und der Radwegweiser.
Auf die Gemeinde/ADFC Fri/Tourismus zugehen und da mal fragen? Das kann ich mal machen.
GerdP (2024-07-11 09:15:31+00:00): Das wäre prima. Wenn das so explizit verboten ist, dann sollte wirklich keine Radroute da lang laufen.
emersonveenstra (2024-06-12 12:38:40+00:00): Hi there,

Please never disconnect roads like this. If something is closed long term for construction, you need to use construction tagging: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction

But note that it's not recommended to tag construction that will take less than 6 months.
AbramsPilot (2024-06-12 14:22:54+00:00): Thanks, I'll keep that in mind. I am curious about the six month recommendation. Does that mean that routers like OSMAND are going to send folks into a dead end for three months or is there some other way to warn folks about road closures?
emersonveenstra (2024-06-12 17:27:52+00:00): It does mean that OSMAnd won't know about it, but presumably there's a posted/signed detour that people can follow and OSMAnd will re-route them.

You could also do conditional restrictions (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions), so for example adding "access:conditional=no @ (2024 Jun 13 - 2024 Aug 30)" would tell OSMAnd not to route through that intersection for those dates
AbramsPilot (2024-06-12 17:55:16+00:00): Thanks again. I need to spend more time in the WIKIs.