piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-27 13:26:27+00:00): A body of water that is not fully on a golf course and is part of a larger body, such as a lake, ocean, river or pond should not be overlayed with a duplicate water layer tagged as a water hazard purely for a golf game.

To map something temporarily is wrong and is against the guidelines.

Trust me, I share Allison's frustration with Golf Mappers and the vandalism.  I have spent the past few months having to police and clean up after golf mappers who have done some wild things, some even doing significant damage to the map.  The efforts of volunteers could be better spent supporting humanitarian projects, like mapping areas that were impacted by the recent tornadoes.  Being able to assist in search and rescue and surveying is a better use than cleaning up after people mapping for a golf game that can't import certain features so users must intentionally tag things incorrectly.

Actually, the volunteers are kinda sick of it. Some users have resorted to just reverting things generously, regardless of whether some of the changes were valid.  There is just enough time to sort through all the golf edits, especially when many are incorrectly deleting and readding features already, which goes against other OSM guidelines.
AndresDuhour (2023-03-27 10:36:25+00:00): Buen día! hice un cambio en la zona de colegios ya que esta etiqueta se utiliza para el área específica que ocupa el terreno de las escuelas, y abarcaba toda la manzana que tiene casas y edificios. Le di forma aproximadamente así que se puede mejorar si conoce la zona. ¿Qué le parece? Saludos, Andrés
highflyer74 (2023-03-21 06:26:44+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

In this changeset you added the address of a single building to a terraced building that already carries the interpolated addresses of all buildings.

Please be so kind to always check if data is already present in OSM to avoid redundant data. If you are unsure, please ask a fellow mapper or open a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes if you think something needs to be updated. You can also always ask on https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Thank you!
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-03-21 17:17:34+00:00): The schools look duplicated and I can't see any buildings there. Maybe imagery is outdated.
ironalloy (2023-03-24 19:15:21+00:00): Please don't edit places this far away in one changeset as it makes it show up for everyone else from Uganda to Estonia.
Zaunhänger (2023-03-22 18:52:35+00:00): Moin, kann es sein, dass Sie hier die Sitzbank mit einer Bankfiliale verwechselt haben? MfG
hd_m (2023-03-26 12:09:30+00:00): Yes, excuse my bad English, please.
pio2_122 (2023-03-20 21:18:32+00:00): Błędne rozrysowanie ciągów pieszo-rowerowych (mimo wielu komentarzy dotyczących tego od innych userów). Zmiany wycofane.
tsp15 (2023-03-22 21:51:34+00:00): Proponuję zgłaszać tego użytkownika. Jakiekolwiek uwagi do niego nie docierają.
bxl-forever (2023-03-21 00:08:19+00:00): Hello,

Pardon my curiosity but a bus shelter normally has amenity=shelter + shelter_type=public_transport, but no building tag.

Tagging it as a building is only seen for rare cases where there is a sort of bunker made with bricks that acts as a shelter.  But plastic and glass devices installed by JCDecaux or Clear Channel never qualify as buildings in OSM.

Would you mind reconsidering the way you tag them?
wkdgs (2023-03-21 12:26:51+00:00): Du könntest noch "fee=no" hinzufügen. Dann ist der freie Eintritt auch gemappt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133915566
Mic6464 (2023-07-14 17:48:04+00:00): Bonjour Arretche, 

Tu n'as pas ajouté les noms de rue en français alors que la commune bénéficie d'une signalétique bilingue sur ses panneaux; avec préférence pour le basque qui est placé en premier (en haut) et le nom français en second (en bas). Je ne conteste pas ton choix d'avoir placé le nom basque comme nom par défaut puisque effectivement la commune donne "priorité" au nom basque. Mais du coup on ne peut pas rechercher les noms de rue en français. Comment pourrait-on remédier au problème ? Je sais que Musculdy n'est pas la seule commune concernée. Je te remercie et te souhaite un très bon week-end.
Mic6464
Arretche (2023-07-17 13:59:36+00:00): Bonjour @Mic6464,

C'est une très bonne question. Comme tu as vu j'ai pris en compte la volonté de la commune de mettre comme nom officiel aux rue le basque. 

La seule solution serait de mettre les noms en français avec le tag "name:fr". 

Je vais me le tenter comme ça mais j'ai peur que ça ne renvoie des erreurs dans Osmose. On verra bien.

Amicalement

Arretche
Mic6464 (2023-07-18 10:20:33+00:00): Bonjour Arretche et merci pour ta réponse surtout que je me suis a priori trompé de contributeur : tu as entré les adresses de la commune mais c'est Arrutic qui a entré les noms de voies (à moins que je ne me trompe encore).
Et oui si on entre le nom en français sans le mettre par défaut, on aura des alertes Osmose "rouges" du genre "Langue par défaut différente de la langue locale". Je ne vois pas trop comment résoudre le problème quand on veut tenir compte du choix de la commune de mettre à l'honneur le basque plutôt que le français, comme reflété sur les panneaux. 
(Sinon ça pousse les communes à présenter une BAL certifiée sans aucun nom en français, comme Ayherre... Là effectivement aucun problème, la langue par défaut est le basque et le nom multilingue est le basque aussi : aucune difficulté  à prévoir du côté d'Osmose)

Très bonne journée à toi.

Mic6464
Langlaeufer (2023-03-21 09:11:28+00:00): Das bicycle=yes darfst du nicht entfernten, sonst kann der Router nicht die Kante verwenden wegen vehicle=no. Ist im übrigen auch mit Durchfahrft verboten, Radfahrer frei beschildert
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133915901
tracker51 (2023-03-22 01:07:20+00:00): War ein Missverständnis - s. meine PM!
Drahtochse (2024-02-29 21:26:20+00:00): Hi Wies1!

Kannst du mir sagen, wo hier und bei der Benachbarten Straße "Zur Vossel" der Lit Wert herkommt? Hier gibt es keinerlei Straßenbeleuchtung.

Gruß,
Drahtochse
wies1 (2024-03-01 12:10:38+00:00): Hallo,
habe gerade nachgeschaut. Tatsächlich ist die Strasse "zur Vossel" nicht beleuchtet - habe nun lit auf no gesetzt und es damit berichtigt. Mit benachbarter Strasse meinst du wohl "Am Brachthahn" (falls du eine andere Strasse meintest, bitte genau bezeichnen). Auch da habe ich lit auf no korrigiert - sehe auch dort keine Lampe.
Gruss
wies1
LERTC (2023-03-20 21:26:07+00:00): Please can the changeset comment be updated. For some reason the text of my previous edit elsewhere got included.
LERTC (2023-03-20 21:34:38+00:00): Real changeset comments:
The two blocks in the road are wooden "planters" filled with earth and a few plants.
jmarchon (2023-03-21 01:32:30+00:00): Nice work! Welcome to OSM!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133916490
silversurfer83 (2023-03-21 17:10:09+00:00): Hi there :)

thanks for contributing.

I'd like to add that the ways were a bit fragmented. You can connect several short segments of way by selecting them with the mouse while holding down the "shift" button. After you selected the neccessary ways, just hit "C".

Also, it would be rather nice of you to square your buildings after you added them. Simply hit "Q" after you connected the last nodes.

I already went ahead and did the work. You can see it here, for example https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=133949378

Please take a little more care in the future. Thank you :)

Cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133917483
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-02 11:57:32+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10749513080/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
rogeriocs (2023-03-20 23:44:24+00:00): Sou novo mais discordo e acho errado definir vias residencias como estradas terciarias, segundarias e principais vendo como exemplo o mapeamento nos Estados Unidos onde minhas filhas estudam, trabalham e moram! Aqui está sendo usado o criterio errado !
user_18721979 (2023-03-21 00:11:27+00:00): Também discordo e acho errado
Famlam (2023-03-20 22:38:24+00:00): Vergeten bronnen aan te geven:
Naast survey (werkzaamheden) ook BAG (voltooid & gesloopt gebouw), PDOK en BGT (voor de trappen)
martianfreeloader (2024-01-28 14:23:48+00:00): Hi, seems like the name of https://www.osm.org/relation/15624185 contains the ref. Can we change the name to "Pot kurirjev in vezistov NOV Slovenije"?
MitjaJez (2024-01-30 20:10:19+00:00): Pot kurirjev in vezistov NOV Slovenije is not finished. See master route:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1658429
This master route needs to be sorted in order after importing all segments.
Once all segments would be imported, it's ment to rename segments - but during importing I saw helpfull to have segment id in name (I know, if we would have better tools or, tools that would combine ref +name when showing relation - this wouldn't ne neceserly. So just do it what you see it's better.
martianfreeloader (2024-01-30 22:42:22+00:00): Oh sure, if this is an ongoing project that you're working on, I'd leave it up to you. I can't speak for other mappers, but I personally find it acceptable if you use this non-standard naming temporarily while you're finishing the project if that helps you.
DiogoBaptista98 (2023-04-12 09:18:53+00:00): The line between elvas and badajoz doesn't exist and it is just planned, please correct it back to railway=proposed
Alafoss (2023-03-24 11:43:00+00:00): Hi,

on which basis did you upgrade the highway classification of the roads in the Dandenongs region? Which source did you use?

Cheers
MapAbility (2023-03-24 12:10:13+00:00): Hi Alafoss,

I used the Australian data source Vicmap Transport, matching road hierarchy between the two. 
https://www2.delwp.vic.gov.au/maps/spatial-data/victorian-spatial-data#Vicmap_Transport-11
rogeriocs (2023-03-20 23:46:28+00:00): Sou novo mais discordo e acho errado definir vias residencias como estradas terciarias, segundarias e principais vendo como exemplo o mapeamento nos Estados Unidos onde minhas filhas estudam, trabalham e moram! Aqui está sendo usado o criterio errado !
rogeriocs (2023-03-20 23:35:26+00:00): sou novo e ainda estou aprendendo mais nesse caso o nome da empresa na fachada já é Dasa https://dasa.com.br/ Deixou de ser "Leme" a algum tempo.  Foto de uma das filias: https://1drv.ms/u/s!An3-PmcYvz1qalkT5TI8-J6y8bs?e=OBh2Hs Se puder corrigir agradeço!
user_18721979 (2023-03-21 00:08:13+00:00): A fachada do laboratótio da minha rua já é Dasa
user_18710783 (2023-03-21 00:50:39+00:00): O grupo Medico Leme existe mais vendeu os laboratórios para Dasa. O grupo Medico Dasa comprou e já alterou ou está alterando o nome na fachada das filias em Salvador. O rogeriocs na minha opinião não cometeu nenhum erro e foi corrigido   de modo errôneo.
user_18721822 (2023-03-21 01:16:45+00:00): Leme agora é Dasa
wille (2023-03-21 10:04:35+00:00): O fato de uma empresa comprar a outra não significa que uma marca vai deixar de ser usada. A Natura comprou a The Body Shop e ambas marcas continuam existindo, por exemplo. O mesmo aconteceu com a compra da Whole Foods pela Amazon, e existem inúmeros outros casos.

Se você encontrou um local que tem a marca DASA, mapeie apenas esse local. A notícia que você postou é de 2016, pelo menos até alguns dias atrás haviam unidades com a marca Leme. Se eles realmente mudarem tudo, outros mapeadores perceberão e farão a mudança no tempo correto.
rogeriocs (2023-03-21 10:17:52+00:00): bom dia! espero que os outros mapaedores percebam!
opendcc (2023-03-21 06:51:42+00:00): Tante G sagt, das Hofmann in Saueröd ein Dienstleister für Handwerktätigkeiten ist. Und dann finde ich, man sollte es auch so taggen. Schönen Gruß an die Küste.
lberges (2023-03-23 08:44:10+00:00): Update: Ich habe in Erfahrung gebracht, daß dieser "Dienstleister", Hr. Hofmann, verstorben ist. Ich ändere aber nichts, weil ich noch nicht weiß, wie es weitergeht.
rogeriocs (2023-03-20 23:48:14+00:00): Lamento pelo meu erro! Não foi intenciional! Vou tomar mais cuidado!
skyper (2023-03-21 15:57:26+00:00): Hallo minidampfbahn,
herzlich willkommen bei OSM, Schön, dass Du mithelfen willst die Daten zu verbessern.
In meinen Augen ist eine Miniatureisenbahn nicht automatisch ein Vergnügungspark. In Freiburg finde ich ist es nicht einmal `tourism=attraction`. Siehe auch https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/does-a-single-miniature-railway-already-count-as-theme-park.
Bei Freitext als Wert von `opening_hours` muss dieser in doppelte Anführungszeichen gefasst werden.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?

Viele Grüße,
skyper
minidampfbahn (2023-03-21 16:58:30+00:00): Hallo skyper,

bin noch neu und habe bei den schweizer Kollegen geschaut. Dort ist es auch als Vergnügungspark angelegt.
Freizeitpark Ysebähnli am Rhy, Rheinstrasse, Pratteln, Bezirk Liestal, Basel-Landschaft, 4133, Schweiz
skyper (2023-04-28 13:38:51+00:00): Hi minidampfbahn,
sorry, ich wollte Dich nicht von weiteren Änderungen abschrecken. OSM ist nicht immer einfach und wir haben mal alle angefangen.
Leider gab es bei der Diskussion im Forum wenig Beteiligung. Ich habe jetzt doch `tourism=attraction` plus `attraction=miniature_train` verwendet, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135469861.
Die Anlage in Pratteln kenne ich nicht, daher habe ich auch nichts geändert. Grundsätzlich ist es eine gute Vorgehensweise die Tags von gleichen Einrichtungen zu verwenden.
Wenn Du Fragen hast, kannst Du mir die gerne als PM oder auch im Forum (https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56) stellen.
Viele Grüße,
skyper
rskedgell (2023-03-21 11:53:19+00:00): Hi,

Could I ask what all these pavements are for? They're not connected to anything else via crossings, so won't actually be used by any routing software.

Separate sidewalks can be really useful for pedestrian routing on main roads with defined crossing points. Mapping the crossings as well allows a lot of accessibility features like tactile paving and lowered kerbs to be added (a survey with StreetComplete, or Bing Streetside/Mapillary imagery can be useful for this).

Separate sidewalks on long residential streets without any crossings can be a little less helpful, as it can result in a router taking the scenic route around via the nearest crossing or junction.
LittleWolfCorban (2023-03-21 12:01:56+00:00): Hi, sorry. I don't have much experience, I just saw there is pavement in other parts of the city so I assumed it's ok to add in other parts too like for example this residential area. Sorry for that
rskedgell (2023-03-21 12:24:27+00:00): No need to apologise! It's absolutely fine and won't cause any problems for anyone else.

Doing the necessary "plumbing" to connect it up for routing and accessibility can be a bit tedious, but I think it's worth it on busier roads.

If it would be helpful, I could take a look at a bit of Horn Lane tomorrow and do a couple of the crossings as an example? (Note that some mappers differ in how they map crossings, so there isn't one "right" way to do anything)
highflyer74 (2023-03-23 06:51:12+00:00): Ich nochmal kurz: die Änderungen an Fuß- und Radwegen sind an dieser Stelle nicht sinnvoll gewesen und ergeben widersprüchliche Informationen. Das ist nicht schlimm. Jeder macht am Anfang Fehler. Lass uns aber, bevor du weiter diese Wege bearbeitest sprechen, damit wir das gemeinsam in die richtigen Bahnen lenken können :-)
wkdgs (2023-03-21 12:24:55+00:00): Einen Radweg kannst du auch einfach mit "highway=cycleway" angeben:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:cycleway

Dann könntest du auch gleich "segregated=yes" und "footway=sidewalk" entfernen. Die ergeben ja keinen Sinn, wenn Fußgänger dort nicht erlaubt sind.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133919597
Dazanza (2023-03-21 14:45:38+00:00): Oh ja, da hast du natürlich Recht! Da war ich wohl etwas geistig umnachtet :D Danke für den Hinweis! Ich ändere das heute Abend.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133919597
Palolo (2023-03-21 13:54:31+00:00): Congratulations on your first edits to OSM in Tanzania. Please use the online materials to learn how to accurately map buildings. Us the q key to make the corners of buildings square. Thank you.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-22 07:25:38+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism, and also use of sock-puppet account: changeset/133966018
rskedgell (2023-03-21 11:38:52+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for updating OpenStreetMap!

For the private car park you've added, you might want amenity=parking + parking=surface, as amenity=parking_space is for micro-mapping of individual spaces within car parks.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-22 07:25:29+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism, and also use of sock-puppet account: changeset/133966018
Abby Hatcher Official (2023-03-25 03:55:16+00:00): Reverted By DWG for vandalism, and also use of sock-puppet account: changeset/126473280
skyper (2023-03-21 14:29:53+00:00): Hallo minidampfbahn,
was war denn an `layer=1` beim Dach falsch? Die Lok steht doch unter dem Dach oder?
Bitte verwende auch aussagekräftiger Änderungssatzkommentare, denn Objekte passen wir immer an, und eine Quellenangabe (`source`) wäre auch nett. Muss leider bei iD von Hand eingegeben werden beim Hochladen. Bei Erkundungen vor Ort wäre es "survey". Danke

Fragende Grüße,
skyper

P.S.: Bitte antworte im weißen Kasten unterhalb der Kommentare. Danke.
minidampfbahn (2023-03-21 17:02:58+00:00): Hallo Skyper, ja ist schon richtig, dass das Dach oben ist. Aber der angelegte Punkt "historische Stätte" Typ locomotiv ist ja garnicht auf der Karte sichtbar. Daher wollte ich die Ebenen tauschen.
skyper (2023-03-22 11:49:29+00:00): Hey minidampfbahn, 
danke für die schnelle Antwort.
Tags zu verändern oder bewusst falsch zu verwenden (auch "Tagging für den Renderer" genannt) wird von der OSM-Gemeinschaft abgelehnt. Die Daten sollen die Realität abbilden und nicht für eine bestimmte weiterverarbeitende Software verfälscht werden.

Die Standardkarte, OSM-Carto, stellt nicht alle Tags dar, u.a. `historic=locomotive`. Daher gibt es jede Menge Karten für bestimmte Themen, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM-based_services. Eine Karte, die die Lok und die Waggons weiter nördlich darstellt ist z.B. https://gk.historic.place/.

Viele Grüße,
skyper
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-22 07:17:07+00:00): Are you quite sure this crossing has a name?
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-22 07:25:22+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism, and also use of sock-puppet account: changeset/133966018
Abby Hatcher Official (2023-03-25 03:49:34+00:00): Wow
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-25 01:53:47+00:00): Reverted by DWG as apparent vandalism: changeset/134089977
Abby Hatcher Official (2023-03-25 03:49:55+00:00): Nice
MxxCon (2023-03-21 06:05:31+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete this POI?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133920875
Gapsnap (2023-03-21 15:30:22+00:00): This POI had an address of 250 East Houston Street, but it was placed at 40.7225809, -73.9863889. So, either the coordinate was incorrect or the address is incorrect or the entire POI is incorrect.

I couldn't find a website nor any information on this business (AJ Podiatry) to verify that it is a legitimate POI and to identify the correct location. So I removed it altogether.

If you have additional information to confirm that it is legitimate POI and if you can help update the lat/long or the address, then that would be awesome!
MxxCon (2023-03-21 19:01:19+00:00): So rather than deleting the whole POI node, it's much better to use lifecycle prefix as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix. Or at the very least to delete biz-specific info and leave just the address node(with either the correct address here or move it to the right location). Doing that not only allows that address to be searchable, but also preserves history of that object if there's ever a need to refer to it in the future.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-25 01:49:10+00:00): Duplicate theatre building deleted. Graeme Fitzpatrick,
OSMF Data Working Group
Lynn Grantz (2024-01-18 00:19:48+00:00): Cool
Abby Hatcher Official (2023-03-25 03:49:24+00:00): Nice
jmarchon (2023-03-21 05:22:27+00:00): Good work! Welcome to OSM!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133921176
Diacritic (2023-03-21 09:06:44+00:00): Hi GMH,

Thanks for your contributions to Melbourne, and welcome to OSM!

A couple of things regarding your contributions:

- Electorate boundaries should be mapped as boundary=political. The wiki has a good explanation why: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dpolitical

- We try to avoid deleting elements and recreating them, but instead modify existing elements. This is to keep the history https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

I'd encourage you to keep mapping, and reach out if you have any questions.

Dian
felipeeugenio (2023-03-21 13:42:32+00:00): Hola
No existe surface=cesped. OSM es en inglés. por favor usar =grass.
Por otro lado, veo que agrega pasto en una fábrica, lo que está bien, pero luego la muralla que delimita la fábrica pasa por encima del pasto. Esto está bien? Está el pasto confinado al recinto? Si es así por favor fijarse en esos detalles.En Nestle Purina de Teno hubo que corregirle basicamente todo lo que hizo.
Por favor incorporarse al chat de Telegram para conversar de manera más fluida y poder ayudarlo.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133921575
PraPraCL (2023-04-01 01:34:09+00:00): hola muchas gracias por la info, tengo problemas para unirme en el chat y lo siento por no haberme unido, por mientras tratare de estar respondiendo los comentarios que me dejen :-)
uᴉʍOꓨ (2024-01-24 08:13:09+00:00): Thanks for the update. That's helpful for fellow bikers.

I assume you're a biker, too?
ganmatthew09 (2024-01-24 11:57:26+00:00): @uᴉʍOꓨ yup i do bike! and i also frequent this area a lot
uᴉʍOꓨ (2024-01-25 00:35:37+00:00): I kinda noticed that pattern with your edits, that's why I asked.

Happy to see a fellow biker in OSM. Do you bike with friends who like maps, or are you keen to meeting fellow bikers from the OSM local community?

We've been discussing ideas how we might be able to make better maps that are relevant to our ka-padyaks. :)
MxxCon (2023-03-21 06:16:21+00:00): Hello.
I don't think it's correct to create multi-polygon relation into "traffic islands". The way you mapped them, semantically inside areas become NOT "traffic islands". It is perfectly sufficient to map one area inside of another without creating a relation out of them.

Also I'm not even sure all those areas are correct to map as "traffic islands". They do not match the description as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:traffic_calming%3Disland
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133921640
Necessarycoot72 (2023-03-21 17:59:44+00:00): I used a multipolygon because I thought it was necessary for the feature to render correctly. My line of though was the traffic island was going to overlap the grass area, making the grass impossible to see.

For your other point. I misread the description, thinking it included sections other than the middle of lanes and at the middle of intersections. I will do a revert of this change set. My bad
MxxCon (2023-03-21 18:03:24+00:00): If larger polygon overlapped smaller ones then we'd see nothing but the polygon of US or whatever is even larger :)