piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pwbriggs (2026-05-29 22:27:21+00:00): This was just recently changed from vegan-only to vegan in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183130803. Was that change incorrect?
brianstrauch (2026-05-29 23:39:02+00:00): A few months ago (I believe) they rebranded to "Araya's Place Vegan Thai + Bar". See their website: https://www.arayasplace.com

They used to be known as "Araya's Vegetarian Thai"
pwbriggs (2026-05-29 23:50:42+00:00): Sounds reasonable. We'll see if the other user has information to the contrary.
FroschForscher (2026-05-30 07:19:57+00:00): landuse=sand, ist natural=sand gemeint?
gallseife (2026-05-30 09:08:12+00:00): Warum nicht, man könnte die Miniflecken auch einfach löschen. Mach es wie du magst, nur Wald ist es nicht :)
Omnific (2026-05-30 14:53:41+00:00): Hi, do you happen to know the name of this campground?
BTMapper (2026-05-30 17:10:47+00:00): It does not have a name, similar to the campground of 3 tent sites just south. They are both dispersed camping on a first come, first served basis.
woodpeck (2026-05-30 00:50:58+00:00): This changeset deletes a number of features that are clearly visible on aerial imagery, and the changeset comment of "-" does not give any reasons why these should be deleted. I have reverted this.
VLD0251 (2026-07-09 20:56:47+00:00): Please do not use the "name=*" tag for Arabic translations or alternative names. it should contain the main name used locally on the ground. Arabic versions, when appropriate and supported by reliable sources, should be added using "name:ar=*". please refer to the OSM wiki guidelines on multilingual names: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names
b-jazz (2026-05-31 19:22:37+00:00): FYI  http://osm.org/way/1524477498 crosses over a couple of bunkers.
maddog107 (2026-06-01 15:11:01+00:00): Fixed, thanks!
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-30 01:58:52+00:00): I guess I must have forgotten to mention in the report that I already manually removed the remaining SEO spam tags for their changesets, so it seems I ended up wasting both of our times here without anything to show for it. Oh well--lesson learned for the future.
FajrAl (2026-05-30 02:19:50+00:00): nitikkin apa?
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-05-30 13:13:20+00:00): Hi! Is there a sign forbidding bicycle riding or dismount there?
timothy_e (2026-05-30 13:34:38+00:00): Hey! Yes, I tried biking on this the other day. There's a no bike sign, and it just leads to a highway on ramp
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-05-30 19:54:33+00:00): OK, perfect thanks!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-05-31 13:19:29+00:00): Please add source from official website. SVP indiquer la source officielle sur le site du gouvernement. Si aucune source n'est produite, je vais retirer ces infos. Merci!
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-04 04:02:48+00:00): access=no, bicycle=yes, highway=footway makes little sense.  This would be a footpath only open to bicycles with that combination.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183380716
sudface (2026-05-30 03:10:26+00:00): * Not an import - accidentally logged into the wrong account
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-04 04:03:30+00:00): It seems more likely that the access in the drive through of an automated car wash would be access=permissive than access=private.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183380940
rsitoni_Lyft (2026-06-05 04:29:32+00:00): Hello Baloo Uriza,
I added access=private to the ways because the same tag already existed on the connected way, and I followed the existing tagging without investigating its history. After reviewing your comments, I found that the tag was originally added in 2020 (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dXNBE_lEoXBM-e1x9189xVMZhET_xd6c/view?usp=sharing) when the area contained only a single house & another mapper later moved the way in 2025 while keeping the same tag. When I extended the way, I mistakenly carried that tagging forward instead of checking the detailed history..
I apologize for the mistake and will take greater care with future edits.
I agree that a car wash is more likely to have permissive access than private access. Although I did not find signage indicating permissive access, I have removed the incorrect access=private tag and made additional corrections in the following changeset.-(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183625733#map=19/35.653195/-97.453550&layers=P). 
But If the access=permissive value will still make sense, feel free to amend our changes.

Regards,
Ravinder
felipeeugenio (2026-05-30 13:12:45+00:00): Hola. Le borré el tag building=. Claramente no todo eso es un edificio. Pero tb le saqué el tag de amenity. Si bien es un recinto de carabineros, no es precisamente una comisaría supongo.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183381604
SekeRob (2026-05-30 06:41:45+00:00): Sorry, anytime someone touches the SS16 route a nation long BoundBox is created. This needs splitting per region or even province and then combined into a super route.. Will limit the version changes now on v2083... and counting
mueschel (2026-05-31 10:58:23+00:00): Hi,
please have a look at the tags added here: There are more than 10000 nodes with a "설치목적구분" tag which looks like it has been uploaded by mistake.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:40:04+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185570626
felipeeugenio (2026-05-30 13:13:36+00:00): Hola. El tag de edificio es para estructuras, no para el predio completo. Y lo moteles parejeros son love_hotel. El concepto de Motel en Chile se usa de manera distinta en todo el mundo.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183384410
Vicente_Estate (2026-06-02 02:11:14+00:00): Hola, respecto a lo primero no caché que lo puse como edificio, gracias por arreglarlo. Y por la etiqueta, le puse motel porque pensé que era mejor, aunque generalmente para poner etiqueta veo los lugares cercanos, ya que siempre hay muchas parecidas, mejor sigo así.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:40:05+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185570626
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-31 23:41:48+00:00): Разве лишний?
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:40:06+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185570626
mueschel (2026-05-31 10:52:54+00:00): Reminder: OSM is not a platform for menus of restaurants. Please don't add dozens of "food" and "drink" tags - these are for special offers only.
roamingsonaa (2026-06-01 04:56:15+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. 🤙🏽
roamingsonaa (2026-06-01 04:57:12+00:00): 😎
Comino (2026-05-31 20:20:27+00:00): Thanks for the update. I again deleted wrong tags like the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes".

The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NOT accepted.
Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Cryptocurrencies_with_payment_tag and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:*#Cryptocurrencies

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:57:39+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185570991
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-30 09:48:33+00:00): nieźle, dodane zanim do domu wróciłem :)

dzięki!

(a gdybyś miał ochotę się wspólnie na jakąś wycieczkę rowerowo-mapową wybrać to byłbym chętny)
Leo Slager (2026-05-31 13:04:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Jakka (2026-05-31 07:02:41+00:00): Please only edit one place at a time and finish the upload *before* moving to another part of the map
Leo Slager (2026-05-31 13:06:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2026-05-31 13:11:17+00:00): Hallo Aeration 348,

Je changset gaat nu over ongeveer half Nederland heen. Bij het verschuiven van de kaart in de edit modus loop je een grote kans om een node of way die per ongeluk geselcteerd is te verslepen met ongelofelijk grote schade aan de kaart.
Gelukkig is dat hier niet gebeurd.
Maar het is dus aan te raden om na een wijziging deze te uploaden naar de server, uit de edit modus gaan, de kaart verschuiven en dan een nieuwe changeset openen.

Veel plezier met verder mappen.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:57:40+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185570991
AndyB_66 (2026-06-04 19:03:08+00:00): Pokaż, proszę, dowód, że ta droga jest faktycznie i w rzeczywistości (w terenie) w trakcie budowy. Przekazanie placu budowy to tylko czynność administracyjna.
theDM (2026-06-04 19:06:04+00:00): Przekazanie placu budowy oznacza początek prac, więc prace w najbliższym czasie ruszą. Na początku pewnie będą drobne zmiany w organizacji ruchu na wyjazdach z budowy.
AndyB_66 (2026-06-04 19:18:40+00:00): Na OSM mapujemy rzeczywistość, tu i teraz, a nie przyszłość. Przekazanie placu budowy nie oznacza automatycznie wejścia wykonawcy w teren i rozpoczęcia prac i dużo wody w Odrze może jeszcze popłynąć (jakby co, służę przykładami). Przywróć, proszę, stan poprzedni na "proposed", bo inaczej cały zestaw zmian pójdzie do wycofania, zgodnie z konsensusem na forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/drogi-w-budowie/94470 i zasadami OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what%E2%80%99s_on_the_ground
theDM (2026-06-04 19:21:19+00:00): Daj mi moment, bo fa Discordzie ktoś już pisał, że w niektórych miejscach zaczęły się prace. Zweryfikuję to i najwyżej cofnę na proposed.
AndyB_66 (2026-06-04 19:24:10+00:00): W takim razie zostaw "construction" tylko tam, gdzie jesteś pewien, że faktycznie trwają prace (np. odhumusowanie) i powstaje korpus drogi. Jeżeli jest to np. wycinka drzew, to de facto oznacza to wyłącznie zmianę granicy lasu.
theDM (2026-06-04 19:24:17+00:00): Mam info, że rozpoczęły się wycinki drzew, więc coś się już dzieje.
AndyB_66 (2026-06-04 19:25:36+00:00): Sama wycinka drzew nie oznacza konstrukcji drogi.
theDM (2026-06-04 19:27:17+00:00): Dopytam, gdzie dokładniej prowadzą wycinkę i najwyżej poprawię.
theDM (2026-06-04 19:36:10+00:00): Poczekam na odpowiedź, czy coś poza wycinkami robią i najwyżej dam proposed.
AndyB_66 (2026-06-06 19:50:08+00:00): ?
theDM (2026-06-06 19:54:06+00:00): Widzę cisza, więc skoryguję na proposed.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-08 20:40:55+00:00): wycinka drzew pozwala na zaznaczenie highway=construction i landuse=construction
theDM (2026-06-09 02:15:23+00:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YYf-7eFRd4
w niektórych miejscach zaczęli działać, ale nie wiem, na jakiej części zadania
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-31 09:57:39+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is this name real?
Underlida2 (13895382838), v1
OSM-Arno (2026-06-01 10:08:00+00:00): Yes, it's documented locally. There's also a sign on the property with the name.
https://www.sorbybyalag.se/pl-1219-underlia-2/
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-01 10:10:59+00:00): Thanks!

#HappyMapping
OSM-Arno (2026-06-01 10:14:29+00:00): Ich glaube du sprichst Deutsch....
Der Name wird im Dorf in den aus historischen Dokumenten aufgearbeiteten Materialien nun so verwendet. Im Dorf sind an etlichen Stellen Schilder aufgestellt auch auf dem Grundstück. Auf dem Schild ist die Bezeichnung ebenso vorhanden. Gerne kann ich ein Foto schicken. Die Aufschrift entspricht aber in etwa der im Internet.
https://www.sorbybyalag.se/pl-1219-underlia-2/
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-01 14:43:17+00:00): Hej hej, 

Ja, passt. Danke für deine Antwort. Ich war mir nur im ersten Moment etwas unsicher, weil es kommt leider hin und wieder einmal vor, dass jemand eine Straße oder einen Ort umbenennt, ohne das dies beabsichtigt ist.

Ist nur eine Kleinigkeit, aber sollte es nicht normal "Underlida 2" heißen? Also mit Leerzeichen zwischen dem Namen und der Zahl.

Beste Grüße
Pascal
OSM-Arno (2026-06-01 15:06:12+00:00): Ja besser, passe ich an
Danke. Schönen Tag noch.
dknelson9876 (2026-06-02 01:58:33+00:00): Hi Spanwar, if you have access to proprietary post-construction imagery, rather than just deleting the old lanes=* values, could you please take the time to add the new lanes=* (and destination:lanes=* and placement:*=*) values?
Spanwar_lyft (2026-06-05 04:17:18+00:00): Hi dknelson9876,
My name is Suraj, and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for your comment.I do have access to post-construction imagery and have updated the lane changes and placement tagging in this changeset(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183625015#map=14/40.61974/-112.03721&layers=P)
I appreciate your feedback and acknowledge that I should have verified these details more carefully before making the edit. I regret the oversight and will be more attentive in future edits
dknelson9876 (2026-06-05 18:56:36+00:00): Wonderful, thank you
mueschel (2026-06-06 17:22:50+00:00): Hallo,
was heißt denn "alighting"? Wenn nur ausgestiegen werden kann: "exit_only" ist schon an ein paar Stellen im Einsatz.
czubi (2026-06-06 17:33:24+00:00): Hallo mueschel, ich kannt es vorher auch nicht und witzigerweise finde ich es auch nicht wieder. Tausch es bitte gegen exit=only, das schein gebräuchlicher zu sein. Und irgendwo in PT2 verankert. Danke für den Hinweis
czubi (2026-06-06 17:40:25+00:00): Und wenn alighting dann hätte es vermutlich alighting=only heißen müssen. Habs nicht wiedergefunden wo ich das her hatte....
joost schouppe (2026-06-02 07:39:45+00:00): Hoi Thierry,
Ik denk niet dat jij dit voor het eerst zo gedaan had, maar het vrijeptijdspunt was twee keer gemapped; een keer op zijn grondgebruik en een keer op het gebouw. Dubbele POIs moeten we absoluut vermijden. Ik heb nu het landgebruik op "civic" gezet, aangezien het denk ik om een overheidsvoorzining gaat.
thierydem (2026-06-02 16:26:48+00:00): Beste Joost dank dat je deze opmerking gezien hebt, dit was uit het oog verloren . Heb deze middag ter plaatse binnen gegaan in het gebouw en nagevraagd hoe de werking is. in de inkom is er een bureel Dienst Cultuur & toerisme (Deerlijk Leistreek,Brugse Ommeland) en verder zijn het allemaal grote zalen. Mvg Thiery
joost schouppe (2026-06-03 07:21:19+00:00): Dit is geen Note hoor, gewoon een kleine opmerking bij je wijziging. Ik heb die dienst toegevoegd als toeristisch informatiebureau op basis van de website ervan.
silversurfer83 (2026-05-31 18:08:12+00:00): thanks :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183390315
Jordi MF (2026-05-30 09:51:14+00:00): En español, es menos frecuente el uso de "Carcagente" que "Carcaixent". Así lo recoge el CORPES de la RAE.

La RAE afirma que en los "topónimos cuya forma tradicional en español ha caído en desuso en favor de la forma local, se da primacía a la forma local" (https://www.rae.es/dpd/ayuda/tratamiento-de-los-toponimos).

La misma RAE ofrece la herramienta CORPES y afirma que "pretende ser una muestra razonablemente representativa y equilibrada del español del siglo XXI". Por lo tanto, se trata de una herramienta que permite saber qué formas son más frecuentes en textos en español.

Y por último, las formas que actualmente están perdiendo peso en textos formales en español no se pierden. Existen etiquetas (old_name:es=*) que permiten mantener esa información en la base de datos.
BER319 (2026-05-30 11:28:39+00:00): Der fünf städte-weg hw 27 wurde von mir hier leider aus Versehen gelöscht. Da ich von unterwegs keine wiederherstellung machen kann und ihn sowieso abwanderer trage ich ihn gleich komplett neu ein.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:57:41+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185570991
jimkats (2026-06-13 01:06:27+00:00): Hi, this changeset broke the geometry of https://osm.org/way/892095651 even though there was a clear note= tag there which mentioned that its outline should not be attached to nearby ways.

Attaching areas to roads isn't generally suggested and should be avoided, especially when the road is wide enough that opposite areas can't border with each other.

I would like you to revert this change to how it was (not manual detachment).
cstal (2026-06-13 06:42:00+00:00): Hi Jimkats, thank you for this info and my apologies for overlooking the tag you created. When cadastral data cannot be used for digitizing, and when the shift between multiple satellite image backgrounds is too large, I generally and systematically did snap polygons with roads.
I unsnapped #way/892095651 and would like to appologize for the inconvenience.
dypa (2026-06-01 08:25:47+00:00): исправил внесенные ошибки

были удалены теги этажности и историчности здания https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183483655

использованы необычные теги https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183484257
dypa (2026-06-01 08:26:56+00:00): @Константин Гам есть возможность проверить https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1084705679 и другие изменения по велодорожкам?
iuvi (2026-06-02 11:27:18+00:00): @dypa когда смотрю в приложении показывает только батарейки, как сделать что бы и лампочки тоже показывало? или это надо писать разработчикам приложений а не команде OSM?
Константин Гам (2026-07-14 10:24:40+00:00): Надо писать авторам конкретного приложение. ОСМ это только данные, а то как их отображают или интерпритируют приложения - это к авторам оных... можно хоть светофоры как могилы рисовать, это сугубо фантазии разработчиков.
multimodaal (2026-06-15 19:17:28+00:00): Hoi, de melding is onterecht, heb pad teruggezet. Gister survey gedaan,  er is hier nog een hek dat opengaat met toegangsbord, zie 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1703767267637736
multimodaal (2026-06-15 19:18:35+00:00): PS wel goed dat je 'm op disused had gezet ipv helemaal verwijderd, anders is het helemaal zo'n zoektocht..
multimodaal (2026-06-15 19:18:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58306865/history
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 04:03:08+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185571112
Fraxi (2026-05-30 10:28:51+00:00): Май с JOSM специално тази задача е по-лесно да бъде разрешена...
foreigner037 (2026-05-30 10:32:46+00:00): Не бях тръгнал с тази идея, просто правих нещо друго и видях малък участък, където бяха закачени.
test0022012 (2026-05-30 16:49:08+00:00): Hello, why are you deleting my data? Please stop.
test0022012 (2026-05-30 16:49:12+00:00): Hello, why are you deleting my data? Please stop.
test0022012 (2026-05-30 16:49:18+00:00): Hello, why are you deleting my data? Please stop.
Leo Slager (2026-05-31 13:11:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
fortera_au (2026-06-01 00:39:13+00:00): Hi, what government website was your source? Just because it's a government website, it doesn't mean we automatically have the right to use it.
TheSwavu (2026-06-01 05:06:11+00:00): I checked the SA gazetter. There a a few problems: 1. Not a village it's a valley. 2. In the wrong location 3. Correct name is Lyndoch Valley / Putpayerta

I have fixed these problems.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 04:03:09+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185571112
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 04:03:10+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185571112
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 04:03:11+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185571112
bxl-forever (2026-05-30 10:38:09+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for this.
In this edit, you added an old name to this building, which is fine.
There is no shame in explaining what you *really* do on the map. We would be grateful if can please use better changeset descriptions for your edits, instead of "added details".
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Thanks.
corrector_91 (2026-05-31 15:23:45+00:00): Hello, 
Yeah, sure, no problem. I usually do pretty small additions, that's why I simplify to "add details". 
I can put more info on the changes.
pesticides (2026-05-30 10:17:36+00:00): The bicycle=designated tag is for roads or paths that have signage indicating the road/path is intended for cycling. In this area, such signage is rather rare on roads—the only examples I can think of off the top of my head are Seattle's Healthy Streets.

There are yellow diamond signs with a bicycle symbol on this road. A yellow diamond sign is a warning sign to inform road users of a potential hazard. In this case, the signs are there to warn drivers that cyclists may be present, because the design of this road puts cyclists at risk. This is distinct from a sign indicating the road is intended for cycling.
pesticides (2026-05-30 10:19:50+00:00): Tagging the road with bicycle=yes would be fine, but unnecessary because all roads in the area allow cycling by default.
czubi (2026-06-03 14:25:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1524543688

was ist das?
czubi (2026-06-03 14:26:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233555091#map=15/50.57936/11.22604&layers=N

MP nur mit outer?
streckenkundler (2026-06-08 20:23:44+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/offensichtlich-problematische-bearbeitungen-im-thuringer-wald/144453
johsin18 (2026-06-05 05:49:30+00:00): Hallo Kulturist,
Sie können gern Ihre Firma eintragen, aber wieso haben Sie die Adresse des Vorderhauses mit dieser Änderung entfernt?
johsin18
Kulturist (2026-06-05 13:18:46+00:00): Hallo josin18,
das war wohl ein Versehen, ich werde morgen mal versuchen dies zu korrigieren. Sowohl das Haupthaus vorne, wie auch das Hinterhaus haben beide die Nr. 43. Danke für den Hinweis, ich bin da ganz neu dran und noch nicht ganz drin.
Freundliche Grüsse
bxl-forever (2026-05-30 10:44:51+00:00): Hello,

On ville30.brussels, this part of the boulevard is still listed with a 50 km/h speed regime.

That might be a recent change, then.

In this edit you changed the maxspeed tag without adapting the source:maxspeed tag, and we now have a situation that says that 30 km/h is enforced by road signs (typically C43 signs).
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1524546626
This combination of tags is probably a mistake and I would like to fix it.

Can you please describe the kind of signage they have here.  Are there really C43 signs saying a 30 km/h speed limit, or did they just end the previous limit, i.e., back to the 30 km/h default speed regime?

Thanks.
mux4 (2026-05-30 13:32:29+00:00): Neither, they inserted a 30 zone inside the 50 road inside the Brussels wide 30 zone.

In other words: It's a section in a 30 km/h zone (F4a) in the middle of the 50 km/h road (C43). I drove by there this morning. You can see the signs on Mapillary, for example: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1250802859762422&focus=photo&lat=50.8356984&lng=4.4346406&z=17&x=0.43299396266435214&y=0.45831979704465886&zoom=2.9964428277910704
bxl-forever (2026-05-30 15:45:52+00:00): OK, thanks for the explanation.
I’ll fix the source:maxspeed tag and I’ll also notify the Brussels Region about the fact that this speed limit has been around for some time now and their reference map is outdated.
Thanks.
Bauxite (2026-06-03 06:56:28+00:00): Salut, c’est juste pour signaler que tu avais accidentellement transformé le cimetière en étendue d’eau lors de cette modification (landuse=cemetery est devenu natural=water). Je viens de corriger ça donc pas de problème. Merci pour l’ajout du robinet.
Peperlito (2026-06-03 21:34:12+00:00): Bonjour oh pardon pour la fausse manip et merci d’avoir rétabli!