piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Warin61 (2026-03-19 23:35:53+00:00): Hi,
What feature is relation Rotorua Central Mall (20086689), v1 trying to map?

An indoor corridor?
A building?
A shop?

It is tagged for all 3 ... 

I think it should be mapping the shop=mall as 

Each building has a separate way .. and they are separate buildings? So tag the separate ways as such .. this enables each to have different heights, colours, materials roofs etc. 

The corridor would not take all of the internal space. 

Next problem: there are shared segments between outer ways... see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=176.25138&lat=-38.14068&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Simply create a new way that incorporates all of these buildings and put that way into the mall relation.
jtn20 (2026-02-04 14:31:41+00:00): The roadway represented by way 1461896141 has been entirely blocked off with fences and other obstructions since aerials were taken; and it never had the connectivity shown by this change (it used to open directly onto Huntingdon Road).
So I reverted this in changeset/178097634.
(I think it's likely to become a cycle/pedestrian access to the new development currently represented by way 119662211.)
ikostyabik (2026-02-05 14:24:31+00:00): Hi, jtn20!
Thank you very much for your detailed feedback. I have reviewed everything and agree that the information I originally provided was inaccurate. I appreciate your help in correcting it. Have a nice day!
Best regards, Kanstantsin!
GrabTH_Bulakorn (2026-01-15 06:29:28+00:00): Source: Local Knowledge
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:31:06+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13457372903 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Coworking Space in Memmingen"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Coworking Space in Memmingen"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-25 08:54:24+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/177350781
IpswichEdits (2026-01-15 15:18:30+00:00): Hi Wadie Chelly. I appreciate your comment on this changeset and reasons for deleting, but just deleting a way isn't the answer to stop this happening. Unless I'm mistaken, the way you deleted was marked as a public right of way (bicycle=yes,
designation =public_bridleway,
foot=designated,
highway=bridleway,
horse=designated,
prow_ref=Witnesham BR 30)
Assuming those are correct, then it's not private as you suggest. You should probably revert this change. Incidentally, it was already tagged as highway=bridleway, which, according to the wiki, automatically implies motor_vehicle=no. (See here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=bridleway?uselang=en-GB ) By deleting it, you're removing it from the map for all map users, including pedestrians, cyclists and horse riders. Thanks :-)
Wadie Chelly (2026-01-15 15:23:55+00:00): If there is any other way from stop getting the van stuck in private road just do it I appreciate it
IpswichEdits (2026-01-16 10:49:16+00:00): Hi. I'm not sure why van drivers are using this. I'm no expert, but I believe that in theory, I don't think routers for motor vehicles should be using anything marked as highway=bridleway, so it sounds like this is a problem with the routing software used by the van drivers, or possibly the van drivers have their software set up incorrectly, perhaps? The only other suggestion I have would be based on the second paragraph on this page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access which suggests that you could add access=no to this way, then also make sure that all permitted types of traffic (e.g. foot, bicycle, horse) are specified to override the blanket 'no' permission. Thankfully those were already set on this way, so in this specific case, once reverted, you could simply add 'access=no' and I think that should cover it.  Hope that helps. :-)
IpswichEdits (2026-01-16 10:57:04+00:00): (If you need help reverting the changeset, feel free to let me know)
IpswichEdits (2026-01-20 21:40:34+00:00): Hi again. Just to let you know I've reverted the changeset and added the 'access=no' tag. It needed to be done quickly as this can affect routing for some users. For future reference, deleting highways isn't a good idea unless they actually don't exist. Try adding 'access=no' and see if it helps, but add other tags to allow the correct traffic types to use it. Thanks for chatting about this.
Wadie Chelly (2026-01-20 21:53:26+00:00): I appreciate your help thank you 🙏
IpswichEdits (2026-01-20 22:04:20+00:00): No problem at all. Keep up the great work! 😊
Tatfahren (2026-01-15 11:29:09+00:00): Laut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=tertiary?uselang=de muss es keine Kreisstraße sein, es geht nach dem Ausbauzustand.
chris66 (2026-01-20 20:19:04+00:00): CS wurde revertiert, da nicht diskutierte Änderungen am Straßensystem durchgeführt wurden.
chris66 (2026-01-21 09:29:18+00:00): Siehe auch:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/user-reklassifiziert-strassen-falsch-und-reagiert-nicht-auf-changeset-kommentare/140798/
Destabilizacja (2026-01-15 07:36:00+00:00): Na podstawie rejestru zabytków.
xephos1one (2026-01-16 16:21:06+00:00): Hallo pingsler,
bevor du weiter Straßen neu klassifizierst solltest du unbedingt nochmal das Wiki lesen, insbesondere https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribuierung_von_Stra%C3%9Fen_in_Deutschland

Das betrifft nicht nur diesen Changeset sondern so ziemlich alle:
In Deutschland kann man nicht an der Zuordnung "Staatsstraße", "Kreisstraße" o.ä. sehen, welche Klassifikation es in OSM haben soll.
Das ist zwar grob ein Richtwert, bedeutet ansonsten aber lediglich, dass diese Straße vom Staat oder Kreis gewartet wird.

Hier ein paar Beispiele:

way/482812329 - Sollte primary sein, da "In sehr großen Städten, in denen die Bundesstraßen ihre ursprüngliche Bedeutung verloren haben, kann von der strikten Regel highway=primary = Bundesstraße abgewichen werden, wenn die Bundesstraßen kein vollständiges Hauptstraßennetz mehr ergeben. In diesem Fall kann es sinnvoll sein, auffällige Lücken mit primary zu schließen." und
"Außerdem können auch Straßen mit übergeordneter Verkehrsbedeutung als highway=primary getaggt werden, selbst wenn sie amtlich niedriger klassifiziert sind (z. B. nur als Staatsstraße)" was hier als Umfahrung definitiv der Fall ist.

way/179487520 - "kann als secondary kartiert werden, wenn sie [...] als neugebaute Umgehungsstraße eine hohe Verkehrsbedeutung hat", mindestens aber tertiary siehe nächster Punkt.

way/11650567 - Okay, ich gehe mit, dass das nicht unbedingt secondary sein muss, aber mindestens tertiary sind es auf jeden Fall, da "Vorfahrtsberechtigte Durchgangsstraßen, die lediglich ein Stadtviertel oder ein Wohngebiet erschließen, sind typisch für highway=tertiary"

way/25496856 - Das sollte definitiv trunk_link bleiben.
"Auf der anderen Seite endet der Link spätestens dort, wo er auf eine andere Straße einmündet. Spätestens dort, wo eine untergeordnete Straße stumpf auf dem trunk_link endet oder diesen kreuzt, verliert er seine Trunk-Eigenschaft"

Das waren nur Beispiele.
Bitte lies das Wiki, prüfe deine bisherigen Änderungen nochmal dementsprechend und unterlass bis dahin in Eigenregie durchgeführte Neuklassifizierungen, ohne vorher die Community zu konsultieren.
opendcc (2026-01-18 11:52:52+00:00): Der User liest das aber nicht bzw. ist beratungsresistent und macht munter weiter mit formalen Umklassifizierungen. Für mich ein Art mechanical edit.
opendcc (2026-01-18 11:59:54+00:00): Ich habe mir ein paar Beispiele genauer angesehen: z.B. wa 1253910304 (Am Flugplatz): das ist formal eine Gemeindestraße, aber wegen der Verkehrbedeutung als Ortsumgehung gehört das definitiv höher. CS sollte man reverten. Interessant, das dieser User das nicht zum ersten Mal durchzieht.
chris66 (2026-01-20 20:16:18+00:00): Habe den CS revertiert, da offensichtlich Qualitätsmängel vorliegen.
chris66 (2026-01-21 09:28:59+00:00): Siehe auch:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/user-reklassifiziert-strassen-falsch-und-reagiert-nicht-auf-changeset-kommentare/140798/
pwbriggs (2026-01-15 19:03:51+00:00): Thank you for the contribution. I changed this to building=garage because it looks from aerial imagery like there is a garage building here.

Tags can be confusing, but let me know if this was intentional!

Thanks again for the contribution, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! If you have any questions, feel free to ask here or on https://slack.openstreetmap.us/
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:31:09+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13457457311 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Travel agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 08:54:27+00:00): 🗑️🤖 Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/177672855

 If you believe this deletion was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:31:11+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13457448918 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Math tutoring center for students"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-25 08:54:28+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/177418972
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-05 09:39:12+00:00): Removed hgv designated tag because it was tagged based on DMAMPO map; fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177564904
infeeeee (2026-01-16 12:33:31+00:00): Szia!

Ilyenkor a pontot a helyén szoktuk hagyni, és a címkéket átvinni az új helyre. Így később látható, hogy milyen üzlet volt minek a helyén. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Javítottam itt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177296537

További jó térképezést!
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-05 09:39:34+00:00): Removed hgv designated tag because it was tagged based on DMAMPO map; fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177564904
schoka (2026-01-16 11:23:09+00:00): Hallo "Anton von AWilan de",
willkommen bei OSM! Du hast einige Point of Interests (POI) hinzugefügt, die nicht vollständig sind. In diesem Fall gibt es auch schon einen Punkt/POI mit gleichen Informationen. Da der Gebäudename sicher nicht "AWilan IT-PC-Web! GmbH&Co.KG", empfehle ich dir diesen Eintrag wieder zu löschen und statt dessen den bestehenden Punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=4455557197 zu verwenden. Hier sollte auch der Typ ( office=it ) hinzugefügt werden, dann wird dies auch in allen Apps mit richtigem Symbol angezeigt. 
Auch bei deinem ersten Eintrag "Florian Obermeier" fehlt der Typ. 
Gruß
schoka
Anton von AWilan de (2026-01-21 16:28:56+00:00): Hi Schoka,
ich bin neu hier. Der Gebäudename ist auch nicht AWilan IT. Das Gebäude hat prinzipiell keinen Namen, hier hat meine Firma, die AWilan IT-PC-Web! GmBH & Co.KG Ihren Sitz. Den Typ kann ich gern hinzufügen. 
Wie benennt man ein Gebäude, was sind die Kriterien? Markiert man hier keine Firma?
Gruß Anton
schoka (2026-01-23 10:19:02+00:00): Hallo Anton,
schön dass du dich mit OSM beschäftigst. Aller Anfang ist etwas mühsam.
Schau dir die Einführung https://learnosm.org/de/beginner/ an, dann weisst du schon viel. 
Im Wiki wird jedes Feld erklärt und es gibt Vorschläge für fast alles: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Map_Features
Zu diesem Eintrag: Es war bereits ein Punkt "AWilan IT" vorhanden. Bei diesem hat noch der Type gefehlt, also shop=, amenity, oder wie in diesem Fall office=it. Schau dir meine gerade durchgeführte Änderung an. Du kannst den POI gern mit weiteren Attributen erweitern (Öffnungszeiten, Telefon, Mail ...).
Man hätte in diesem Fall auch die gleichen Attribute dem Gebäude zuweisen können. Falls das Gebäude jedoch die gleichen Attribute benötigt, z.B. hat ein historisches Gebäude einen Eigennamen, gibt es Überschneidungen und Probleme der eindeutigen Zuordenbarkeit. Deshalb bevorzuge ich einen Punkt für ein Geschäft, oder Büro. 
Bitte prüfe auch deinen anderen Eintrag "Florian Obermeier" noch einmal. Bei einem privaten Haus, darf auf keinen Fall der private Name als Hausname verwendet werden. Wenn du fertig bist, sag Bescheid, dann können wir noch einmal darüber diskutieren.
lipuma (2026-01-15 09:12:50+00:00): Hi Pim, is het mogelijk om een comment toe te voegen aan je changesets? Dit maakt het voor andere mappers duidelijker wat er wordt veranderd aan de kaart. Het hoeft niet enorm uitgebreid, een enkele zin is ook goed.

Alvast bedankt!
Pim Moerenhout (2026-01-15 10:13:21+00:00): Jazeker, in het verleden gebruikte ik het wel bij het toevoegen van de slootjes in de polder. Ik ga het weer consequent toevoegen. Dank je!
lipuma (2026-01-15 10:15:06+00:00): Super, dank je wel! Ook bij relatief kleine en onbenullige edits is een korte comment zinvol.

Mapse!
Clement FALLAHI (2026-03-31 12:25:22+00:00): Belle piste agricole !
benoitdd (2026-02-04 14:27:19+00:00): pour qu'elles soient repérables, le nom n'est pas suffisant,  il faut aussi ajouter 
amenity=toilets (voir le wiki pour plus d'infos : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets)
pitfire (2026-01-15 11:12:20+00:00): Hallo Peter Kaempf,
warum wurde das Betriebsgebäude nicht in seinem Originalumriss beibehalten?
Wurde vordere Bereich abgerissen?
MfG pitfire
yelisey90 (2026-01-15 10:10:53+00:00): Instead of deleting 41.707591/44.714936 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1060282313, it would've been better to reclassify it as a driveway, adding private access and gates...
borbalo_kj (2026-01-15 19:39:03+00:00): Its not even a driveway. You can see a really high quality satellite images of Tbilisi at maps.gov.ge
yelisey90 (2026-01-16 09:15:38+00:00): Indeed, and it's really useful to see them directly when editing in iD. Just open Background settings to the right, click three dots near "Custom" and enter https://nt0.napr.gov.ge/NGCache?x= {x}&y= {y}&z= {z}&l= ORTHO_GEORGIA_4 but without the spaces after = symbols. These's also a note about acceptability of using this imagery at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Georgia_Abkhazia_South-Ossetia .

And yes, there is indeed a small driveway that branches off a bit to the east of the main intersection and continues past the gates into private territory.
Zrop (2026-01-18 14:23:28+00:00): Hallo Der Troisdorfer,
wieso änderst Du weiterhin Gebäude zu "building=yes" zurück ?

Gruß
Zrop
Fraxi (2026-01-15 09:42:19+00:00): Здравей!
Моля да имаш предвид коректния формат за телефонните номера!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_numbers_in_Bulgaria

Оправих го.
venelin98 (2026-01-15 10:39:43+00:00): Благодаря
Hung Tran 9x0 (2026-01-15 14:25:35+00:00): Bạn viết sai chính tả rồi. Ngách chứ không phải Nghách, và tên thì phải viết hoa.
Mr Chat GPT (2026-01-16 04:59:57+00:00): oke bạn
yelisey90 (2026-01-15 10:16:17+00:00): Note that barrier=wall + area=yes	means that the whole area is a solid wall; this combination is used to map some really thick walls, like city walls. To map a wall around a plot, just use barrier=wall without area=yes.

Also, may I inquire what are the approximate borders of Kaklebi settlement? It's not the first time that I encounter this name, but I was unable to find any information on its extent and relation to the Bagebi settlement.
borbalo_kj (2026-01-15 19:35:38+00:00): I see. I'll update the areas—the walls here are usually really thick and tall.
​You are correct, Kaklebi has no relation to the Bagebi settlement. Kaklebi sits between Tskneti and Bagebi. It’s an upscale residential area with massive private houses. Unlike Tskneti, which is mostly summer houses, this is a permanent settlement where most owners live year-round. I'll try to find the exact borders, maybe by asking locals what is considered Kaklebi and what isn't.
yelisey90 (2026-01-22 07:45:50+00:00): Hm, please take notice of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177544111
BCNorwich (2026-01-15 11:54:46+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed the landuse=residential as the building is within an area tagged thus.

Regards Bernard.
opendcc (2026-01-16 13:26:34+00:00): Mechanical Edit? Schau Dir z.B. mal https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4763660/history an: da wurde bewußt wegen Verkehrsbedeutung auf secondary statt primary entschieden, warum machst Du das alles platt?
chris66 (2026-01-21 09:29:36+00:00): Siehe auch:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/user-reklassifiziert-strassen-falsch-und-reagiert-nicht-auf-changeset-kommentare/140798/
aaronq227 (2026-02-02 19:14:27+00:00): Hi Frans S,

I noticed some recent classification changes from highway=living_streets to highway=residential. The OSM Wiki mentions that living streets in Indonesia are narrow roads "in residential area, around 1.5 - 2 m in width and passable to cars at low speed” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines). Many of the roads that were updated appear quite narrow and seem to align with this definition. Would you be able to share your reasoning behind these changes, as well as any resources or imagery you used to support the edits?

Thank you for your time and I look forward to hearing from you!
Frans S (2026-02-03 14:22:19+00:00): Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention.
I consulted the wiki 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines#Roads
.
While validating tasks, I regularly came across highways tagged as living_street. 
Considering that a ‘living_street’ is generally (from my Western perspective) a road that is specifically designed for pedestrian traffic and local residents, where cars/motorcycles, etc. are banned as much as possible. So I retagged them to
residential highway when I also took the width of such a road into consideration.
I regularly come across incorrectly tagged roads, which I often change to what I consider to be a better tag.
Think of tracks connecting settlements, residential highways in rural areas, paths wide enough to be an unclassified road, etc.  
I also see places where a road has been retagged to ‘living street’, when it is actually a connecting road >2.5 meters or more or runs through rural areas. I usually adjust these.

I have changed most (hundreds) of the taggings I changed to residential highways back to ‘living_street’.
It is impossible to name specific locations, because I have validated almost 1300 tasks. An impossible task.
I hope this has provided you with sufficient information.
Kind regards


Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
aaronq227 (2026-02-03 21:47:22+00:00): Thank you for providing resources and following the Indonesian Tagging Guidelines page. I agree with changing roads that are > 2.5 meters or connect through rural areas to residential or unclassified. If my team comes across any of those roads, we will also make those changes. Also if we come across any residential roads in small Indonesia towns’ road networks that meet the narrow street characteristics, we will update back to highway=living_street. 
I appreciate your time and have a good day!
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:31:14+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1467242351 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Barbershop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-25 08:54:28+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/177344648
eggie (2026-01-15 10:51:27+00:00): Dag supr  Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
Nakaner-repair (2026-01-18 15:05:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177377717 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by UID 23711946 (name omitted for brevity) due to spammy SEO description
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:31:16+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13457686814 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dental practice in Crown Point"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 08:54:32+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177672858
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
vsandre (2026-07-03 09:22:31+00:00): Die Änderung der Straßenklassifikation in Flöha entspricht vielleicht der offiziellen Einstufung im Wegenetz, aber auf Grund des noch nicht abgeschlossenen Bau der Umgehungstraße nicht der lokalen Nutzung.
Nakaner (2026-07-03 11:35:28+00:00): @vsandre Der User hat sich, weil er vermutlich den Gegenwind nicht vertragen hat, gelöscht. Wenn du der Meinung bist, dass du Recht hast, darfst du das einfach revertieren. Kontolöschung = mir doch egal
Rainero (2026-03-19 22:28:31+00:00): Revert mit changeset/180132081
(unzulässige Quelle)
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:31:21+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13457717788 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Fachhandel fur alkoholfreie Getranke"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Fachhandel für alkoholfreie Getränke"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
Nakaner-repair (2026-01-18 15:05:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177377717 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by UID 23711946 (name omitted for brevity) due to spammy SEO description