piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bastibay (2025-09-20 09:00:10+00:00): Ich habe die Bodenplatte mal wieder entfernt, da die Darstellung irreführend ist.
user_5359 (2025-09-17 13:25:13+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13146725065. What is the mean of the tag ngồi ở ban công: = yes? 

Please notice we use britisch English for keys and standarised values. Normally no spaces in the key and no colon at the end of the key.
rempshaener (2025-09-16 14:54:55+00:00): Hallo,
wieso hast du die Telefonzelle reaktiviert?
Viele Grüße
ostfriese4 (2025-09-16 16:04:46+00:00): Wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4963191#map=19/53.747305/7.477610&layers=N
rempshaener (2025-09-16 19:53:21+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe die Telefonzelle am 20.08.  kontrolliert, da war sie erwartungsgemäß nicht mehr in Betrieb. Es gibt in Deutschland keine funktionsfähigen Telefonzellen mehr, https://www.telekom.com/de/blog/konzern/artikel/die-letzten-groschen-sind-gefallen-1019918. Ich habe die Änderung rückgängig gemacht.
Viele Grüße
dpolovinkin (2025-12-11 20:02:19+00:00): hi, just to ask - are those parking areas skewed by design or not? corners are not squared, I mean
dpolovinkin (2025-12-11 20:05:21+00:00): and the main question - I'm not familiar with this tag rules, but the way it mapped is weird taking into account the description in wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dparking_position) "Draw a way from the relevant taxiway and to the nose wheel position. The direction of the way indicates the direction a plane should park. This usually means that the last node of the way should be where the nose wheel is parked. Tag the way."

But you've drawn rectangles there instead of a way, why? doesn't it mean you marked those parking places incorrectly here?
joost schouppe (2025-11-20 14:29:19+00:00): Je kan dan best ook healthcare op was:healthcare zetten. Ik pas het even aan.
mappinglander (2025-11-10 21:06:03+00:00): Evet kavşaklar çok kötü olmuş
Fraxi (2026-04-23 19:00:54+00:00): За https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11212816913/ amenity=payment_centre или amenity=money_transfer?
Dimitar155 (2026-05-13 20:50:38+00:00): Нито едно от двете. Обменно бюро с easypay.
Tris_1220 (2025-09-16 10:49:59+00:00): What did you update besides removing 3 stations that are in use?
adamos (2025-09-16 11:37:56+00:00): Hi, sorry for my edits. I intended to fix broken bus relations using the relatify.monicz.dev tool. Since some of the bus stops are not correctly mapped, they were removed by accident, sorry for that. I should have paid more attention to that. 
Now I reverted all my 6 reprted edits back, leaving the relations uncomplete
hlfan (2025-09-17 00:20:11+00:00): fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172038751
Tris_1220 (2025-09-16 11:14:15+00:00): Wyh did you remove the following stations from the relation? 
Leopoldine-Padaurek-Straße
Moritz-Dreger-Gasse
Leopoldau
hlfan (2025-09-17 00:12:31+00:00): known relatify fault - added back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172038646
Tris_1220 (2025-09-16 11:10:44+00:00): Why did you remove the stop "	Leopoldine-Padaurek-Straße"?
hlfan (2025-09-17 00:02:17+00:00): known relatify fault - added back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172038468
DressyPear4 (2025-09-16 10:08:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171662785
Tris_1220 (2025-09-16 11:17:33+00:00): You removed the stop position at "Matthäus-Jiszda-Straße" from this relation, was this an accident?
hlfan (2025-09-16 23:58:52+00:00): relatify fault - added back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172038407
Tris_1220 (2025-09-16 11:25:40+00:00): Why did you remove all stations from "Schlachthausgasse" until "Heinrich-Drimmel-Platz"?
rempshaener (2025-09-17 17:06:37+00:00): Hallo,

zu diesem Änderungssatz habe ich folgende Anmerkungen:
Zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1430199634: „Hütte vom Heimatverein Dannenberg“ ist kein Name, sondern eine Beschreibung.
Dafür gibt es stattdessen passende Tags:
Das bereits vergebene building=hut und operator=Heimatverein Dannenberg. (Und die Geometrie passt irgendwie nicht).
Zu www.openstreetmap.org/way/1430199635: Wenn es keine konkrete Person/Institution gibt, bleibt das Feld „operator“ leer.
Zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13142279379: Hier passen die Tags nicht zusammen. fire_hydrant:diameter gibt es bei Brunnen nicht. fire_hydrant:position=lane passt nicht zu einem Brunnen. Löschwasserentnahmestellen haben keinen Namen. Die water_source müsste groundwater sein. Der fire_hydrant:type ist pipe.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13146878608: Datumsangaben bitte im Format 2025-11-15 (Und ohne hellseherische Fähigkeiten - November)

Viele Grüße
Tris_1220 (2025-09-16 11:22:44+00:00): Why did you remove the platform from these stations:
- Enkplatz, Grillgasse
- Schrankenberggasse
Secondly why did you remove the following stations from the relation completly?
- Reumannplatz
- Matzleinsdorfer Platz
hlfan (2025-09-16 23:48:00+00:00): typical relatify fault - partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172038207
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-30 15:04:00+00:00): hello! can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5073913  ?
dcapillae (2025-09-16 12:43:00+00:00): Hola.

Gracias por los cambios.

He revisado el conjunto de cambio, corrigiendo el etiquetado y añadiendo algunas vallas y pasos adicionales.

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
eggie (2025-09-16 11:03:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Meestal zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van eenrichtingsverkeer. Is dat hier het geval? 
Nu is bv een fietsroute geblokkeerd.
We voegen dan toe oneway:bicycle=no en evt ook voor moped en mofa.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
robkla (2025-09-16 11:10:15+00:00): Ik ga zo even bij de weg kijken zodat ik je hier snel antwoord op kan geven!
eggie (2025-09-16 11:10:56+00:00): Aangepast met oneway:bicycle=no
maxspeed 30 ipv 5o conform verkeersbesluit.
Geldt de max snelheid ook voor het de andere wegdelen Jan Olieslagerweg Parmentierweg?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-16 11:18:31+00:00): Oke top!   Kijken kan zeker geen kwaad, want het kan zomaar anders zijn. 
Ik heb even in het Gemeenteblad gekeken naar de verkeersbesluiten.

MVG
eggie
robkla (2025-09-17 07:22:19+00:00): Het is een fietsstraat van 30KM/H geworden. Dacht dat het pad ernaast voor de fietsers was maar dat zal dan voor de voetgangers zijn. Fietsers dus 2 richtingen op. auto's 1 richting.
eggie (2025-09-17 07:31:39+00:00): De uitzondering voor fietsers heb ik al toegevoegd. 
Wanneer het officieel een fietsstraat is dan kun je een extra tag toevoegen cyclestreet=yes
en als er een officieel bord (fietsstraat auto te gast) staat kun je dat ook toevoegen  traffic_sign=NL:L51

Doe je dat zelf?

MVG
eggie
robkla (2025-09-17 07:39:39+00:00): Mijn eerste wijziging. Ik zie zo snel niet waar ik dat kan doen. Als jij het wilt doen graag. Er staat een bord bij van fietsstraat.
eggie (2025-09-17 07:50:45+00:00): Oke... No problem .. pas het wel even aan.

Groet,
eggie
limes11 (2025-09-16 22:02:55+00:00): Hi,

da hängt noch ein motorcar=permissive auf "Am Steg", das überschreibt den motor_vehicle-tag. 

Außerdem wäre es gut, hier am Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13146836788 noch access-tags zu setzen, ggf. blockiert der nämlich auch Anliegerverkehr.

VG
Der_Fab (2025-09-17 04:25:29+00:00): Super, vielen Dank für die Hilfe.
Ist korrigiert.
Sammyhawkrad (2025-09-16 11:29:52+00:00): Hello Gregam530, I see you have changed/reverted some additions and modifications I made to this bank branch.

First, the position of the bank is on Galloway Road. Amoonakwa Road is down south and ends at the crossing with Commercial Street. Unless that's wrong, the right addr:street should be Galloway Road.

Secondly, the initial opening hours you added are the right ones. The opening_hours for a bank reflects the hours that they are operating with staff. 24/7 may be for the ATM.

Thirdly, the standardised way of recording phone numbers in OSM is with the country dialling code (+233 for Ghana) and the local number without the starting zero. This allows anyone worldwide to call the number.

Lastly, the operator tag represents the entity (person or company) operating a business, and here we normally use the official registered name of the company. Additionally, the branch details are typically added in the branch=* tag and excluded from the name tag. An alt_name can be used for the combination of the two.

I hope this feedback helps. 
Happy mapping!!

Best,
Sam
dp7 (2025-09-16 12:44:14+00:00): Posso sapere perchè hai cancellato la rupe rocciosa sul lato sud del castello ? Io questo posto lo conosco molto bene, tu ci sei mai stato ?
toponomastica_comune_arenzano (2025-09-17 09:31:46+00:00): ho aggiunto il natural=bare_rock tutte le modifiche nascono dal fatto che da un messaggio telegram penso editato da te avevi lamentato che non riuscivi ad aggiungere dettagli adesso esse sono, seppur shiftate, coerenti con sat Bing
dp7 (2025-09-17 15:40:07+00:00): Ok grazie, allora c'è stato un malinteso. Il messaggio non diceva che non riuscivo ad aggiungere dettagli: li avevo infatti aggiunti, ma dopo 24 ore me li hai fatti secchi ! 😉 L'intento del messaggio era far notare che spostare tutto sulla base delle sole immagini Esri non era una buona scelta, ovvero che la mappatura era più corretta prima in quanto centrata sulle heatmaps.
Grazie comunque per la risposta e per il ripristino ! 👍
Frans S (2025-09-30 10:25:15+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key.
Issues found:

A: Inaccurate mapping. 
C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.
H: Included a yard of clearing.


Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172007447
gurglypipe (2025-09-16 11:10:52+00:00): Reported where?

Deleting the name from a campsite won’t mark it as closed in OSM. Instead, you need to change name=blah to old_name=blah, and tourism=campsite to disused:tourism=campsite as per the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix documentation. Thanks
BCNorwich (2025-09-16 13:14:35+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I see you've mapped the whole building as the business, it was previously described as a house. So the question is does the business really occupy the whole building? If not then the business should be represented by a node/POI placed within the house outline. I would think it's actually a contact office, I can help with this if you like.

Regards Bernard.
Ridealux_com (2025-09-17 03:06:21+00:00): we have office in building, if you could fix that would be great. Thanks in advance!
BCNorwich (2025-09-17 05:54:44+00:00): That's done! 
Regards Bernard.
Leo Slager (2025-09-20 10:55:32+00:00): Hello dk9be,

Not only you deleted the charging_station, but you deleted also all ways connected to that node.
I restorde the ways and the routerelations .
dk9be (2025-09-20 14:29:56+00:00): Ok, thank you
wombatmaper (2025-12-04 12:34:20+00:00): Archie, why do you keep removing the oneway tag here? Is it not correct? Please discuss this with your fellow editors instead of engaging in edit wars.
Supaplex (2025-09-19 02:24:08+00:00): Hi Gwdwards724

It seems you are adding stuff that exists at least in two places, which making reviewing changesets more difficult. 

Can you limit your changeset much smaller in your future edits?

Dennis Raylin Chen
Data Working Group
data@osmfoundation.org
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172008825
rempshaener (2025-09-17 16:49:57+00:00): Hallo,

zu diesem Änderungssatz habe ich folgende Anmerkungen:
Zu „couplings“:	Das Feld bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten leer, da es sich um die „Angabe der vorhandenen Anzahl an Schlauchanschlüssen“ handelt, siehe osm.wiki/DE:Key:couplings?uselang=de. Unterflurhydranten haben in der Regel nur mit Standrohr eine Schlauchkupplung.
Zu „water_source“:	Die Quelle „piped“ gibt es nicht, gemeint ist sicher „main“.
Geometrie:	Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie. Die betroffenen Objekte findest du hier: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B%0Aarea%5Bname%3D%22Deutschland%22%5D%3B%0Away%5Bhighway%5D%28area%29%28user%3AOFWimNorden%29%20-%3E%20.highways%3B%0Anode%5B%22emergency%22%3D%22fire_hydrant%22%5D%28w.highways%29%3B%0A%28._%3B%3E%3B%29%3B%0Aout%3B&C=53.147907%3B9.019662%3B14&R=
Zu www.openstreetmap.org/way/665451384: Das amenity=fuel war hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/732715420 bereits erfasst, bitte wieder entfernen.
Zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/665451453: Das ist kein Name, sondern eine Beschreibung. Das erfassen wir in der Regel nicht, daher am besten wieder herausnehmen.

Viele Grüße
richlv (2025-09-20 09:08:39+00:00): Sveiki, liels paldies par kartes papildināšanu.
Daļa objektu pēc izmaiņām palika ar neparastiem apzīmējumiem - piem., https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10736971809/history bija tikai adrese un telefona numurs, līdz ar to automātiski tika noņemta adreses informācija.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31830669/history tika noņemts nosaukums, un apkārt esošā bērnudārza teritorija palika bez nosaukuma.

Vai būtu iespēja nedauz sīkāk aprakstīt vēlamās izmaiņas? Tad kopienas dalībnieki varētu palīdzēt ar šo detaļu pielabošanu.

Aicinām arī pievienoties Latvijas OSM kopienas čatam - https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
Ausmints (2025-09-23 10:57:48+00:00): Sveiki!
Ievēroju ka datu attēlošanas risinājums kuru izmatojam, par pamatu lieto openstreetmap. Viens no klientiem - Bauskas pašvaldība - vaicāja kādēļ kartē rādās novecojuši dati, kā piemēru minot bērnudārzu un fitnesa klubu kuri vairs tur neeksistējot un morga ēku kura esot nojaukta. Uz šī pamata arī veicu izmaiņas, lai gan pats Bausku nepārzinu. Biju plānojis sagaidīt līdz izmaiņas parādās risinājumā un tad palūgt informāciju no klienta kādas vēl izmaiņas būtu jāizdara kartē. 

Attiecīgi par izdarītajām izmaiņām - nezināju kas ir šobrīd nomainījis bērnudārzu un fitnesa klubu, tādēļ neievadīju neko citu. Domāju ka labāk rādīt tukšu ēku, nevis uzņēmumu kurš tur vairs neeksistē.
richlv (2025-09-23 20:05:47+00:00): Burvīgi, liels paldies.
Bērnudārzam laikam ir jauns nosaukums - kopienā interneta meklēšanā atrasts, bet to gan jau ka var vēlāk pielikt.

Fitnesa klubs - pašai ēkai tāds nosaukums vēl palicis. Ja vien tur vēl nav fitnesa klubs, vai arī ēku vietējie tā nemēdz saukt, varbūt tas ņemams nost?
Ja te nenoņems, kartē paliks.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31716055/history

Punkts ar adresi un telefonu - tā kā šāds punkts nav pilnvērtīgi dati, tam tika automātiski noņemta adreses informācija, un palika tikai punkts ar telefonu. Ja kāds tā saucamais "point of interest" (POI) ir zudis, to arī var pārveidot ar "was:..." prefiksu būtiskajam tagam, vai dzēst pilnībā, ja zudis sen.

Morgs - vai zināms, kad ēka tika nojaukta? Ja ļoti sen, dzēšana ir labs risinājums. Ja vēl redzama kādos ortofoto slāņos, bieži to mēdz mainīt uz demolished:building=*, lai kāds cits no vecāka slāņa neiezīmētu atpakaļ.

Izmaiņas OSM rastra failos parasti parādās minūšu laikā (pārlūkprogrammas cache var nākties atjaunināt) - ja ilgāk neparādās, varbūt izmaiņas nav pilnībā veiktas kā iecerēts (piem., kā ar fitnesa klubu).

Ja te kaut kas šķiet neskaidri, priecāšos precizēt te vai, vēl labāk, ērtākajā kopienas čatā.

Un ja Bauskas pašvaldību interesētu šīs brīvpieejas kartes uzlabošana (kartogrāfiskais materiāls, sabiedrības iesaiste utt), varam sīkāk pastāstīt par iespējām. Mūsu brīvprātīgo kopienu vienmēr priecē ieinteresēti, aktīvi pašvaldību darbinieki :)
NeisBot (2025-09-16 11:47:06+00:00): Hi Grazielly C Santos, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added building with address details including housenumber, street, city, and postcode, and adjusted its properties to include number of levels"
Yog Sot (2025-09-16 22:32:50+00:00): fajnie, że podajesz source do tej SOR, a nie jak niektórzy ;)
corfede (2025-09-18 05:28:50+00:00): Hi Begavil, why aren't you replying? You keep adding "living_street" which isn't used in Italy, and you keep naming streets without citing the source.
woodpeck (2025-09-16 11:49:24+00:00): Dear Grazielly C Santos, in this changeset you have added a "grassland" area inside a building. This does not make sense. Please check.

Also, when uploading data the editor lets you add a changeset comment (like "added building" or something like that, of course you can write in Portuguese). Don't just fill the comment with "." as you have done here, because that makes it more difficult for others to understand what you are doing!
aTarom (2025-09-16 14:31:26+00:00): Hi, are the tags
> reservoir:active_capacity
> reservoir:capacity
> reservoir:full_level
> reservoir:max_level
> reservoir:min_level
correct or are they left over from an import? Perhaps they are ele:max, ele:min, ele:natural...?
Cheers
dmfr (2025-09-16 14:51:51+00:00): Hello! Thank you, I was not aware of those tags. The reservoir:* tags are not leftovers from an import, I'm intentionally adding them.
These are the meanings in the datasource I'm using:
- reservoir:capacity - total capacity of the reservoir, in m^3.
- reservoir:active_capacity - useful capacity of the reservoir (excluding the dead storage volume of the reservoir), in m^3.
- reservoir:max_level: Maximum water elevation during flood periods, measured from sea level
- reservoir:full_level: Maximum water elevation that the reservoir should be kept at most times, measured from sea level. This should be some meters below  reservoir:max_level, so that the reservoir should be able to accomodate a flash flood.
- reservoir:min_level: Minimum water elevation that allows the reservoir to fulfill its purpose (be it irrigation, power, etc.), measured from sea level.

So I think ele:max and ele:min are better alternatives to reservoir:max_level and reservoir:min_level. ele:natural is not the same as reservoir:full_level, since ele:natural describes the elevation of a body of water if there was no dams/weirs, which is not the case.

So if you could suggest better names for reservoir:capacity, reservoir:active_capacity and reservoir:full_level, I'd be very thankful.
dmfr (2025-09-16 14:56:17+00:00): I could change reservoir:full_level to ele. The other tags are still up for discussion.
aTarom (2025-09-16 15:03:38+00:00): I think it's best to discuss this first in the community forum; I personally don't have enough insight into reservoirs. Thanks for your reply.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-16 12:01:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8248189285
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404026681

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rskedgell (2025-09-16 23:31:59+00:00): Thanks!
Enock4seth (2025-09-18 14:11:23+00:00): Hi, 
Are you sure about the street names? You added similar name on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170122653

Isn't there Road/Street attached to the names? How are you coming up with these names?
NeisBot (2025-09-16 12:27:20+00:00): Hi жасурбек8485, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Updated name of way to Жаштар"
NeisBot (2025-09-16 12:37:28+00:00): Hi fred48300, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Small edit affecting feature shape only"
Gregory Peony (2025-09-18 03:04:24+00:00): All footpritns you mapped represent buildings but are oversized. Please do not include the shadow a building casts in its footprint. You appropriately mapped the western footprint as T shaped. 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon. 

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
martien-176 (2025-09-16 17:04:34+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT.

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Most buildings do have right angled corners and we need our mapping to reflect that. Accurate building footprints are important because building sizes are often used to estimate population sizes for an area to conduct humanitarian activities. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. 

Also buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such as roads and paths.

Please check out these sources for more info: 
- Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
- Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ 
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT global validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172013209
literan (2025-09-16 20:33:56+00:00): совершенно некорректная правка, от балды. Откат. 

выход из станции это не станция
eggie (2025-09-16 13:23:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
trial (2025-10-09 11:15:36+00:00): I gues you meant:
type=provides_feature
not
type=type=provides_feature ;-)