piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Fraxi (2026-02-20 09:52:16+00:00): Здравейте! Хубаво е, че сте добавил обекти.
Самия шаблон за "Аделайн Джи" - shop=appliance е достатъчен, за да стане ясно, че магазинът предлага бяла техника. Не е нужно това да присъства и в името(name=) 
Вижте и https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
Също и не е необходимо да се вписва адресът в данните на точката за търговския обект, ако не са различни с този на сградата. Адресът може спокойно да бъде прехвърлен върху сградата. Мисля да направя някои промени.
trial (2026-02-20 20:09:03+00:00): Hi, I added a comment to the new mapper that made the mistake: better to keep informed, so that s/he takes care the next time.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178290889#map=17/47.744973/-3.370174&layers=N
Maksim Hradaboyeu (2026-02-25 13:30:11+00:00): Hi trial! Thank you for your participation.
I’m grateful for that!

Best regards, Maksim!
Rainero (2026-03-14 20:37:51+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179875187
(unzulässige Quelle)
NeisBot (2026-02-20 09:24:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13584372661 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Yacht harbor"
---
Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего текста могла бы быть: "Яхтенная гавань"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-28 17:33:07+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179180209
(No visible changes after review)
stillhart (2026-03-05 23:00:17+00:00): is there really a destination charger right next, even in, this supercharger???
NikoJorj (2026-03-12 12:25:46+00:00): There is a wall connector, I'm not sure it's already online.
eggie (2026-02-20 11:59:37+00:00): Bij motor_vehicle niet alleen aan auto's denken. Dat is ook moped en mofa in OSM.
Dus niet =no taggen.
bicycle=yes toegevoegd op vervolg
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-20 11:55:34+00:00): Dag AvN  Beter geen motor_vehicle=no op paaltjes taggen.
layer=-1 verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2026-02-20 09:48:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 17 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/172858732 v11 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1481068479 v1 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/162534636 v10 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1837052434 v3
https://osm.org/node/275045349 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178810607
NeisReview (2026-02-28 17:33:19+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178811623
aboc (2026-02-20 12:48:00+00:00): Maybe industrial=chemical (chemical=chloroalkali or product=chloroalkali) is better? man_made is used for artificial structures, craft for small, artisanal production
EnerLiq (2026-02-20 12:58:28+00:00): Yes, i wanted to make a worldwide map showing where this process is used, but have several discussions how to tag correctly ... i think man_made:chloralkalki fits best accoring to the wiki. What do you think ?
aboc (2026-02-20 13:17:48+00:00): There is precedent in aliasing man_made and landuse=industrial in man_made=water_works and man_made=wastewater_plant. However, these are considered as one distributed structure which may fall under the man_made criteria of artificial structures, so tagging as production leads to logic issues. Another underlying issue is that this area is overly extended and includes various power plants, so it should be broken up.
NeisBot (2026-02-20 10:03:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/172858732 v11 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1481068479 v1 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/53372424 v7
https://osm.org/node/1623854011 v2
https://osm.org/node/13584372765 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178811186
wireguy (2026-06-08 14:38:51+00:00): Artistic, can you check the placement of your business...  or is Des Moines become Vegas?
NeisBot (2026-02-20 10:03:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13584422546 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Commercial building"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Gewerbegebäude"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-28 17:33:07+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179180210
(No visible changes after review)
SafwatHalaby (2026-02-20 20:23:00+00:00): היי, נא להוסיף מסלולי אופניים כ-path

ולא כ-cycleway. 

השני מיועד למסלולים יעודיים בעיקר סלולים, למשל מסלולים עירוניים במרכז
solsTiCe (2026-02-20 10:11:42+00:00): Foch pas Joffre !
OSM_RogerWilco (2026-02-21 17:31:46+00:00): Moin Thomas, die Verbindung ist über die Grundstückszufahrten (mit abgesenkten Bordsteinen) möglich. Den Weg, den Du jetzt eingetragen hast geht über einen erhöhten Bordstein. Weniger sportliche Radelnde werden es Dir danken. ;-)

Das Routing funktioniert auch so: https://bkrtr.de/AM0Nn

Wenn Du solche Verbinungen einträgst, dann am auch den Bordstein (barrier=kerb + kerb=raised) eintragen und den Weg mit path=link markieren, damit klar ist, dass dies nur eine Verbindung ist und kein echter Weg.

Viele Grüße
Thomas Kaminski (2026-03-04 14:11:37+00:00): Ja danke für die Erklärung. Ich werde das in Zukunft besser machen.
Wie du weißt, plane ich öfters Radtouren mit https://brouter.de/brouter-web/ 
und finde da ab und zu kleine Lücken in OSM.
NeisBot (2026-02-20 10:30:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13584454769 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Screen enclosure"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-28 17:33:10+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179180215
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
maro21 (2026-02-25 22:09:29+00:00): Nie tak oznacza się nieczynne POI. Od tego jest prefiks disused.
Parowiec Świecący (2026-02-26 10:02:56+00:00): Wygląda na to, że ona nie jest tylko nieczynna, jak napisano w uwadze, ale została zamknięta na stałe (minęło parę miesięcy i ślad po niej zniknął ze strony bp; nie wygląda więc to na remont). Czy w takiej sytuacji zwykłą stację paliw - jakich tysiące, bez wartości historycznej - jest sens trzymać w bazie danych?
maro21 (2026-02-28 17:47:36+00:00): Przyroda nie lubi pustki, więc może za jakiś czas otworzy się tam inna stacja paliw pod inną marką. A jak się nie otworzy i wyburzą budynki, to będzie można skasować.
Oznaczanie niedawno zamkniętego sklepu lub innego obiektu prefiksem "disused:" lub podobnym to też informacja dla innych mapujących, żeby nie dodali go ponownie, korzystając ze starszego źródła.
eggie (2026-02-20 11:37:30+00:00): Dag WJ  Dat pad zit alleen maar aan de landuse vast. Beter  niet vastplakken. Het heeft geen verbinding met andere paden. Meestal gebruiken we highway=path in het buitengebied.
De vervolgpaden staan hier op slot met access=no? Klopt dat wel?
Ik maak even wat los,
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-20 11:39:56+00:00): Verbinding gemaakt met andere (kruisende) paden.
Pad losgemaakt van landuse.
gr eggie
WJVVermeulen (2026-02-20 14:30:54+00:00): Bedankt, maar ik Ie het nog niet verschijnen
WJVVermeulen (2026-02-20 14:45:53+00:00): Aansluitende paden zijn ook toegankelijk.
eggie (2026-02-20 14:49:59+00:00): Oke.. dan kan dat access=no eraf.
Paar keer ctrl f5 toetsen om het beeld te verversen.. cache leegmaken.
Groet.
eggie
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-20 11:36:10+00:00): Reverted incorrect maxweight tag to proper maxweight:hgv, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178814801 #OptimoRoute
eggie (2026-03-29 18:37:24+00:00): Hoi Sven,
Ik heb foot=use_sidepath verwijderd op plekken waar wandelroutes lopen.
Wanneer je dat toevoegt svp eerst de routes omleggen.
Nu routeert het weer.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-20 11:33:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
maro21 (2026-02-25 22:10:44+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
sheldonelectric (2026-03-03 11:44:17+00:00): This must have been a bug from osmand from which i uploaded the changeset. (It usually completes the comment automatically).
Michal Ozogán (2026-06-28 06:14:09+00:00): Na základě čeho byl na mostu 315353420 omezen provoz cyklistů? Bylo tam přidané, že cyklisté tam můžou jen o víkendech a ve svátky s odkazem na dokument národního parku Nízké Tatry. Most je ale od národního parku velmi daleko. Nejen ten most, ale celý označený úsek.
Filip009CZ (2026-06-28 09:21:14+00:00): Zdravím related_law="Príloha č. 2 k vyhláške Krajského úradu životného prostredia v Žiline č. 9/2004 ; článok 5.d)" 
related_law:url="https://www.napant.sk/pre-navstevnikov/navstevny-poriadok/"

Liptovský Hrádok – Liptovská Porúbka – Vislavce – Borová Sihoť – Liptovský Hrádok (len v dňoch pracovného pokoja a pracovného voľna)
schobbish (2026-02-20 17:02:55+00:00): Hi Rudi_living_map and thank you for your contribution! Could you please explain your source a bit more, we would like to know where these CAD files came from. Also if these are new buildings you can remove the demolished prefix on the building tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178814232
NeisBot (2026-02-20 11:30:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13584536958 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Construction company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-28 17:33:10+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178828710
empty_child (2026-02-20 11:59:36+00:00): Добрый день
Когда обрисовываете дома, отжимайте клавишу Q, чтобы редактор выправлял углы здания под прямым углом
И старайтесь в name не указывать описательные имена (только если это не буквальное имя объекта)
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-20 14:30:21+00:00): Merged unnecessary split and deleted wrong tag; fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178821607 #OptimoRoute
Andrea Musuruane (2026-02-20 15:11:19+00:00): Il tag place=farm serve per indicare il toponimo delle cascine, non eventuali aziende lì presenti.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178815078
mikki65 (2026-02-21 22:12:27+00:00): Corretto
Rainero (2026-03-14 19:59:48+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179874111
(unzulässige Quelle)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-04 03:57:11+00:00): Fixed/removed nonsense and malformed SEO spam tags for Maya Buisness Club POI in changeset 183621510

https://osm.org/changeset/183621510
NeisBot (2026-02-20 11:51:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13584566769 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cleaning service building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-28 17:33:11+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178891090
TinPetreković (2026-02-20 13:59:21+00:00): The node that was accidentally created has been removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178820615
NeisBot (2026-02-20 11:54:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13584593105 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Business club"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-28 17:33:11+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179180219
(No visible changes after review)
TinPetreković (2026-02-20 14:07:26+00:00): The node that was accidentally created has been removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178820969
literan (2026-03-28 13:00:59+00:00): не балуйтесь
aixbrick (2026-02-20 13:02:03+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
ich habe diese Änderung rückgängig gemacht, weil das gesamte Gebäude gelöscht wurde: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178818042.
Zum Kommentar: Bitte beachte, dass der Renderer entscheidet wann, was und wie angezeigt wird. Die Darstellung auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/ ist z.B. nur eine Möglichkeit. Hier werden Büros ("office") als blauer Punkt angezeigt, andere Render verzichten auf deren Darstellung komplett, weil ihre Priorität bei anderen Objekten liegt.
Bitte nicht durch irgendwelche "Tricks" versuchen, die Anzeige zu beinflussen.
Gruß
NeisBot (2026-02-20 12:36:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13584631412 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "IT office"

#MapWithoutSpam
MikroMike (2026-02-20 13:21:35+00:00): IT Office
Patchi (2026-02-21 08:03:13+00:00): Hello sykul,

The relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20243888 that you created is, to my humble opinion, a little bit weird.
To me, it seems to be a walking route, but you used the tag public_transport:version=2, which is used exclusively for public transport relations. Public transport relations usually describe the public transport infrastructure and service, but also the type of vehicle used for the transportation. In this case, there is no vehicle for the transportation, as it seems to be a walking route for a group.
I would rather expect a route=foot than route=walking_bus, which is first not defined in OSM and second a paradox in itself — is it a walk or a bus?

Best regards,

Patchi.
sykul (2026-02-21 11:11:37+00:00): Hello Patchi,
Thanks for the feedback. I wasn't too sure about how to map this thing either, so I was copying one of the other examples that exist https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2kUt
I think walking buses https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walking_bus map more on to public transport schemas than walking routes because they're explicitly modelled after regular public transportation.
They have signed stops, as you can see in my Panoramax photos, and scheduled departure times. 
I'm pretty confident that public transportation tagging works here, although I'm pretty inexperienced with it so if there's anything I can do to improve my tagging, let me know.
Patchi (2026-02-21 12:55:54+00:00): Hello sykul,

Thank you for your feedback and your arguments. I agree with you on almost everything. So yes for the public transportation route=walking_bus, but I still think the public_transport:version=2 is inappropriate, as the PTv2 implies, for example, the differentiation of stops and platforms (which is in this case irrelevant, as the persons will not stop on the road but beside the road, meaning there are no stops, only platforms).

Best regards,

Patchi,
Comino (2026-02-21 08:27:38+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
TinPetreković (2026-02-20 14:17:09+00:00): The node that was accidentally created has been removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178821293
bartgron (2026-02-28 15:54:57+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179176152
Proszę o dodanie obiektu w formie OSOBNEGO punktu
literan (2026-02-21 10:26:48+00:00): здание отрисовано поверх забора
Ozon OSM15 (2026-02-21 11:21:46+00:00): Добрый день.
Прошу прощения,не посмотрела при выравнивании ,что попала отрисовка на забор.
Исправила
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-03 22:04:37+00:00): Nuke SEO spam POI explicitly cited as being sourced from Google Maps in changeset 183615392

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183615392
eggie (2026-02-20 19:15:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM.
Thx for your contribution. I merged the info with the present addressnode.
Greetz,
eggie
NeisBot (2026-02-20 13:42:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/2858589658 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Restaurant tartes flambées"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : "Restaurant tartes flambées"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-28 17:33:12+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179180220
(No visible changes after review)
A67-A67 (2026-02-23 21:13:38+00:00): Deze kringloopwinkel stond al in Openstreetmap, als toekomstige winkel i.p.v. bestaande winkel. Ik heb de dubbeling verwijderd.
VictorIE (2026-06-06 12:18:16+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13584825470/

How come you have put the official name: https://www.logainm.ie/ga/20925 down as the alt_name=*?

The townland was previously mapped here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3380873/
ollphéist (2026-06-08 16:10:41+00:00): Hi VictorIE,
Thanks for the comment. I used on the ground, local signage spelling. In fact I had made a typo. Fixed now - Gleann Chatha.
NeisBot (2026-02-20 14:03:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13584841548 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Pizzeria"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : "Pizzeria"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
Jérôme Nivard (2026-02-20 21:39:18+00:00): Tartes flambées et pizzas.
Jérôme Nivard (2026-02-20 21:39:45+00:00): Tartes flambées et pizzas.
b-jazz (2026-02-24 19:29:28+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1127501566

When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. Take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Golf.png for an example of the "Wrong" way to map a fairway and a green along with the right way. There are some cases where a fringe exists around a green and you should draw the fairway outline completely around a green, leaving room for the fringe. Other times, the fairway and green butt up against each other. In that case the fairway and green should share the same nodes at the boundary between the two, and every node at the boundary needs to be shared leaving no gaps. When drawing these shared nodes, editors like iD (built into openstreetmap.org) will "snap" to an existing node if you get close enough. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out. Thanks.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-20 15:29:53+00:00): @masoudghorbany
You have made incorrect edits in the following change sets
178719429, 178720490, 178670826, 178671058, 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 178672902, 178672856, 178672902, 178672819, 178668353, 178672325, 178670726, 178670646, 178670548, 178670427, 178670308, 178670112 , 178669930, 178707284, 178721809, 178719611, 178720632, 178720490, 178713807, 178713572, 178713486, 178713398, 178740197, 178740096, 178740242, 178740283, 178740338, 178740363, 178740492, 178768666, 178781378, 178821042
These changes you made are incorrect. You have done it on a large scale. You will be dealt with as long as you continue making incorrect changes.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-20 15:32:09+00:00): You are not allowed to record against the rules for personal use or any other reason.
masoudghorbani (2026-02-20 19:38:17+00:00): من واقعا معذرت میخوام که اینو میگم، ولی چرا آخه باید تورک بودن خودتون را همه جا جار بزنید