piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ADAC Touristische InfoSysteme (2024-12-18 08:58:44+00:00): Hi, danke für die Info. Wo sehe ich denn die Diskussion mit dem user Jo_cassel?
Das Beispiel auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:population beschreibt ja auch ganz gut, wozu die Infos benötigt werden (z.B. Rendering und der Schriftgröße). Ich denke, kein Renderer schaut auf die Relation und falsch ist die Info im Knoten ja nicht, oder was meinst Du?
Es sitzen auch deutlich mehr population-Tags auf Nodes als auf Relationen: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/population und die population-Tags auf Relationen in dieser Statistik dürften größtenteils Duplikate vom zugehörigen Knoten sein.
Wie siehst Du das?
surveyor54 (2024-12-18 09:41:19+00:00): Hier die Diskussion:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/grenzrelation-und-place-node-gemeinden-eines-landkreises/85468

Ich habe sie jetzt nicht mehr durchgelesen.  
Ich habe mich damals für dieses Tagging entschieden, und wie auch Jo_Cassel , es in Hessen angewendet.
jeslop (2024-12-13 13:57:31+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160247385
JeroenHoek (2024-12-12 13:00:35+00:00): Please don't add layer=1 on those man_made=bridge. The waterway below has layer=-1 already. These sit at layer=0 (the default).
JeroenHoek (2024-12-12 13:07:25+00:00): Also adding crossing:markings=no to crossing=unmarked is pointless. It is implied.
JeroenHoek (2024-12-12 17:18:51+00:00): Reverted because you are not bothering to reply, even though you are still making new changesets.
jeslop (2024-12-13 13:58:05+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160247423
JeroenHoek (2024-12-12 13:31:25+00:00): 866945563 does not need layer=1. Are you just hitting 'fix' on warnings raised by some QA-tool without looking for yourself?
A67-A67 (2024-12-12 11:28:38+00:00): This changeset has multiple issues:
- SPAR express has its own brand-tag, which is overwritten here.
- OK is not Circle K
- The name BMN Erven Feenstra was correct.
A67-A67 (2024-12-12 11:29:11+00:00): Reverted.
A67-A67 (2024-12-12 12:56:16+00:00): OK and Circle K are different companies.
A67-A67 (2024-12-12 10:24:16+00:00): Hi,
Again, the train Schiphol-Groningen isn't part of a network, especially not the Limburg network. Please don't add tags without knowing the meaning.
A67-A67 (2024-12-12 10:31:59+00:00): Reverted incorrect edit.
jeslop (2024-12-13 13:58:25+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160247435
jeslop (2024-12-13 14:04:46+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160247649
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-03 11:42:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12415399305/history

is it an office of a religious organisation? Church? something else?
Dawid2849 (2024-12-12 12:10:24+00:00): Cześć. Wiesz może jak wygląda sytuacja z mostem nad Borowinką w Sierakowie? Dalej tam są jakieś oznaki budowy?
Dawid2849 (2024-12-12 12:18:15+00:00): Oraz dziękuję za dodanie przystani kajakowej! Ja chciałem przeczekać na nowe orto :P
Lyon-St-Clair (2024-12-17 19:33:47+00:00): Please, stop bring back to life closed train station and replace french name by occitan names never used by SNCF. It's odd and vandalism.
Lyon-St-Clair (2024-12-17 19:36:06+00:00): And dont delete french name.
jeslop (2024-12-13 14:04:25+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160247631
gendy54 (2025-01-24 20:14:38+00:00): Bonjour,

Rien de grave mais pour les prochaines fois, pensez à plus détailler vos modifs: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Faites_de_bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160200471
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-12 10:00:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8767881055
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1342070297

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
jeslop (2024-12-13 14:04:09+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160247620
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-14 04:01:31+00:00): What source was used?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-15 01:26:32+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160296244
jeslop (2024-12-13 14:03:47+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160247608
Dimitar155 (2024-12-12 10:14:09+00:00): * Овча купел - МС К. Величиков
A67-A67 (2024-12-12 10:37:54+00:00): In this edit bicycle=designated is added to many cycleways. This is already implied by highway=cycleway and should't be added.
jeslop (2024-12-13 14:03:22+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160247592
eggie (2024-12-12 14:44:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
A67-A67 (2024-12-12 10:27:39+00:00): This changeset also adds incorrect network tags to the Arriva nighttrains (again, same user...).
A67-A67 (2024-12-12 10:31:39+00:00): Reverted incorrect edit.
jeslop (2024-12-13 14:02:19+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160247565
Vaidotas (2024-12-12 17:28:30+00:00): Why did you add restriction tags on a node? Restrictions should be mapped as a relations and there is one already mapped. Not to mention, that it is even more precise than your version, because turn left is allowed on weekends here.
Bolt028 (2024-12-13 08:56:10+00:00): Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I have reverted my changes.
Andrea Musuruane (2024-12-12 13:33:52+00:00): Ciao. Quando inserito non va bene. E' stata inserita una strada agricola sopra ad altre tipologie di strade gia' presenti. Cosa volevi inserire? Ciao, Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2024-12-12 13:37:44+00:00): Reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160208441
anti-romantic (2024-12-13 16:07:19+00:00): Пожалуйста, обращайте внимание на классы добавляемых дорог. Тег  highway=residential должен использоваться для крупных улиц в жилых зонах. А проезды на парковке - это теги highway=service + service=parking_aisle

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dresidential
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle

Спасибо за то, что добавляете дороги. Но рекомендую читать вики, чтобы потом не приходилось исправлять :)
jeslop (2024-12-13 13:54:32+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160247296
HellMap (2024-12-12 15:54:32+00:00): Čau,

Gribēju precizēt, šitie veidojumi https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12382085648 https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/hellphoto?pKey=1755245778581281&focus=photo ir pārcelti uz otru pusi?

Tie gan laikam ir svētku dekorācijas un iespējams tikai uz mēnesi. Iespējams, tos vispār nav jēgas kartēt ilglaicīgi.
somehundred (2024-12-12 16:00:49+00:00): Jā, tie ir pārcelti uz otru pusi.
jeslop (2024-12-13 13:55:12+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160247317
mavl (2025-02-05 14:02:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162167075 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: wrong values for name:en - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161608012].
Tatfahren (2024-12-12 12:04:19+00:00): Hallo ABerz,
du hast in deinem changeset keine Quelle angegeben. Kannst du diese vielleicht hier als Kommentar nachreichen?

In OSM dürfen wir aus Lizenzgründen nicht ohne Genehmigung von anderen Webseiten oder Kartenanbietern abschreiben, daher ist eine Quellenangabe wichtig, um das nachzuverfolgen. 

Deine eingetragene Wanderroute ist deckungsgleich mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/361832

Wurde diese vielleicht nur umbenannt? 

Bitte beachte das wir in OSM nur eintragen was vor Ort überprüfbar ist. Wanderrouten sollten daher auch bei Freigabe nicht einfach abgeschrieben werden, da man so auch alle (leider häufigen) fehler übernimmt. Außerdem müssen diese ausgeschildert sein. Routenempfehlungen wie bei komoot werden also nicht getaggt, da diese subjektiv sein können und vor Ort dann nichts erkennbar ist.
ABerz (2024-12-13 07:36:35+00:00): https://www.erzgebirge-tourismus.de/gipfelglueck/tour/erdgeschichte-entdecken-im-tharandter-wald/tour.html
Eine Umbenennung kann ich nicht ausschließen. 
Der Weg ist vor Ort mit grünem Schrägstrich auf weißem Grund markiert.
SpinOff (2025-04-29 15:58:07+00:00): Hej. W OSM nie ma miejsca na dodawanie fikcyjnych rzeczy. Zmiana został już wycofana, ale miej to na uwadze w przyszłości.
Rodrigo Rega (2024-12-19 21:16:08+00:00): Hola, Cris:

En este cambio se borró un edificio. ¿Podrías indicar la razón del borrado? Según fotos de PNOA, parece que sí que hay un edificio. Gracias por tus aportes a OSM.

Un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160202628
Rodrigo Rega (2024-12-20 22:41:30+00:00): Ya que no hubo contestación en un tiempo prudencial, he procedido a revertir este cambio. Si quieres añadir de nuevo el punto de interés, asegúrate de no eliminar ningún elemento del mapa en el proceso.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160452190
Rodrigo Rega (2024-12-20 22:43:13+00:00): Me acabo de dar cuenta que el aviso lo hice ayer, así que dejé muy poco tiempo. Voy a proceder a añadir yo mismo el punto de interés que desapareció al revertir.
jeslop (2024-12-13 14:01:48+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160247547
eggie (2024-12-12 14:48:30+00:00): Ik heb de winkel verwijderd en shop=vacant getagd.
Groet
eggie
jeslop (2024-12-13 14:01:08+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160247530
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-06 11:36:56+00:00): can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4745105 ?
jeslop (2024-12-13 14:00:43+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160247515
Pan (2024-12-12 20:43:40+00:00): Ich sehe, dass es schon korrigiert wurde. Danke ! Und sorry fur das Fehler.
habi (2024-12-12 20:44:09+00:00): Kein Problem, wir wollen ja alle die beste Karte der Welt machen!
osmviborg (2024-12-12 11:25:25+00:00): Skolen lukkede i 2010
aTarom (2024-12-12 19:28:46+00:00): Hola, por favor, puede revisar esta carretera que ha quedado con un simple
"layout"="0" ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375937007/history
Raquel-garcia-import (2024-12-23 11:31:10+00:00): Mis disculpas, mediante mis primeras ediciones realicé la eliminación pensando que había eliminado una carretera que había creado por error, pero veo que me equivoqué. Siento mucho todos los problemas que esto haya causado.
Tomas_J (2025-12-15 22:25:06+00:00): Ahoj, node 12415684927 a ine si oznacil ako priechod s ostrovcekom. V skutocnosti tento priechod ostrovcek nema. Opravil som. Daj na to, prosim, v buducnosti pozor.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-12 11:34:59+00:00): 

W https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104843694 nie ma odpowiedzi, wygląda na edytowanie zdalne

nie wygląda na drogę gdzie ze zdjęć otniczych sa się rozróżnić surface=asphalt od surface=compacted

zdejmuję tag surface i zaznaczam notkę jako rozwiązaną
nevw (2025-04-26 11:55:10+00:00): Hi, there are two nodes on top of each other here with two addresses.

330 Cochranes Road:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12415703847

890 Traralgon Creek Road:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12415703846

Can you assist in correcting if necessary, thanks.
aharvey (2025-04-26 21:57:20+00:00): This is an artefact of the import, that different addresses may have the same location and these were imported as such.

https://gitlab.com/alantgeo/vicmap2osm/#stage-8---imported-addresses-sharing-the-same-location-manual-review

As part of the post import I created a MapRoulette challenge for people to help manually address these.

I checked street level imagery between 840 Traralgon Creek Road and 1000 Traralgon Creek Road and couldn't see any other signposted addresses in between, so unless we have any other information we con probably just delete 890 Traralgon Creek Road, what do you think?
nevw (2025-04-27 00:56:33+00:00): Yes, I agree, 330 Cochranes Road seems more suitable.
I'll delete 890 Traralgon Creek Road now.
Thanks for info and help.
Rodrigo Rega (2024-12-12 21:34:18+00:00): Buenas. Para eso exactamente está "highway=proposed", ¿no?. Es como estaba antes, no es necesario el poner construction si aun no ha empezado la obra.

Un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160205128
jeslop (2024-12-13 13:55:55+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160247341
jeslop (2024-12-13 14:00:19+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160247491
jeslop (2024-12-13 13:59:57+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160247478
Frans S (2024-12-28 15:32:05+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A request. Please map each building separately. Do not cluster buildings,
Best regards
user_21804930 (2024-12-12 12:20:33+00:00): was meant to put grass only but it autocompleted
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:09:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:02:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:08:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
salma_ayman (2024-12-17 14:41:11+00:00): Hello mappinglander,
Thank you for your mapping, but the modifications you made here
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1154680183
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1154680185
don't match the newer satellite imagery.
 Would you mind sharing your modification source with us?
kind regards,
salma_ayman
salma_ayman (2024-12-17 14:40:41+00:00): Hello mappinglander,
Thank you for your mapping, but the modifications you made here
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1153860694
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1154539685
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1154539686
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1154539689
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1154539690
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/171625863
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/171625865
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/171625877
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/310166022
don't match the newer satellite imagery.
Would you mind sharing your modification source with us?
kind regards,
salma_ayman
salma_ayman (2024-12-17 14:32:53+00:00): Hello mappinglander,
Thank you for your mapping, but the modifications you have made here
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1253547901) don't match the satellite imagery. Would you mind sharing your modification source with us?
kind regards,
salma_ayman
mappinglander (2024-12-17 15:22:53+00:00): To be simply put, the satellite imagery is super outdated & since that part of Syria is no longer a frontline + troops moved through there, probably by removing roadblocks. so i guess it's not a wrong assumption that it's not in construction & a surveying user should determine road smoothness... i've also seen few twitter videos about cars moving through what used to be marked as construction, but don't really remember the links or accounts so take it with a grain of salt.
so if you want to revert it all, feel free to do so.
also next time. maybe send a message mentioning all the changesets or just comment on a single changeset, changeset comment notifications have cluttered my mail inbox lol :) Have a nice day.
salma_ayman (2024-12-19 13:00:05+00:00): Hello mappinglander,
Based on updated satellite images, These roads appeared that there was road construction. (There are several obstacles across the road.) and We couldn’t find any news or video indicating that the road operation has started, so we will revert to the road construction.
Whenever a comment is made, it includes the modified changeset. This is the reason for sending multiple comments. Especially since the modifications are in different places and require separate feedback from you about each area to ensure the changes were made correctly.
kind regards,
salma_ayman
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-14 04:06:17+00:00): This changeset left the motorway_link disconnected from E 20th Street and seems pointless. 
I'm curious what the feedback was that warranted an edit.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160206528
Saint_Vincent (2024-12-18 04:04:59+00:00): Hi Spaghetti Monster🍝, Thank you for pointing out my mistake and thank you for making the corrections. My edit was moving the split node closer to the junction to improve the experience of the driver taking the slip road from E 20th St. to MLK Jr. Parkway, this was the issue reported. I need to more thoroughly check my edits before uploading the changesets, especially when working these situations and more complex intersections.
ilias_ (2024-12-13 01:14:41+00:00): Your recent edits to the roads of Casablanca are completely mistaken... The Route de Rabat is not the RN1 and the Autoroute Urbaine de Casablanca is not the A101, that's only the Pénétrante d'Ain Harrouda. The Autoroute Urbaine de Casablanca is actually the RN1. Thankfully your changes have been reverted, but please be more careful in the future by checking official links about road references such as this one https://www.equipement.gov.ma/Infrastructures-Routieres/Reseau-Routier-du-Royaume/Documents/Cartes-2019/Provinciales%20FR/6_Grand%20Casablanca-Settat/Pr%C3%A9fecture%20Casablanca%20FR%20A3.pdf
Taya_S (2024-12-12 12:56:56+00:00): Apologies for the large bbox. accidentally reverted 16019959 instead of 160199591
rempshaener (2024-12-23 14:30:58+00:00): Hallo,
ich nehme mal an, die Anpassung auf "Nussbaumallee" ist grundätzlich richtig; dann bitte auch die anliegenden Adressen anpassen.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2025-01-25 17:49:57+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4566414
eggie (2024-12-12 13:36:25+00:00): Hoi..

Voeg je dan nog wel toe construction=cycleway?
Wanneer het voor een korte periode is kun je het beter gewoon fietspad laten.

Mvg..
eggie
werbuli (2024-12-13 12:28:40+00:00): Hallo 01Groot,

herzlich willkommen in OSM.

Du hast bei der FTZ einige Details zugefügt - dazu folgende (weil du wohl Anfänger bist etwas ausführlichere) Hinweise:

Der name-tag sollte nicht als Beschreibung (Alte KFZ-Zulassungsstelle, Atemschutzwerkstatt, Übungsplatz) verwendet werden. Ansonsten sieht man auf der Karte später nur noch „Namen“ und erkennt Wesentliches nicht mehr.
Ich orientiere mich häufig am osm-wiki 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name
Mir haben häufig zu div. Themen die Diskussionen im Forum geholfen. Zum name-tag z.B. hier insbes. die Zusammenfassung unter Punkt 20/20
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/name-tag-fur-gebaude/95181/2

Ich hätte Alte KFZ-Zulassungsstelle ganz weggelassen (also auch nicht als old-name erfasst) weil es jetzt die FTZ ist, sowie Atemschutzwerkstatt, Übungsplatz  ggf. unter description erfasst.

Beim dem mit CS 1342105246  eingetragenen Gebäude hast du amenity=building erfasst  - den tag gibt es so nicht. building=yes ist zutreffend und reicht aus.

Der Parkplatz war bisher nur als Knoten (node) erfasst. Nachdem du ihn jetzt als Fläche (way) erfasst hast, kann der node gelöscht werden = Redundanz vermeiden.
Zum Parkplatz (way) könntest du noch folgende tags ergänzen:
- parking=surface
- surface=.........  (Pflastersteine, Asphalt, ...... ????)

Wenn du Parkflächen neben einer Straße bzw. Grundstückszufahrten erfasst, wäre das parking=street_side.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=parking?uselang=de

Aller Anfang ist nicht leicht - weiß ich aus eigener Erfahrung.
Weiterhin viel Spaß beim mappen.

Gruß
werbuli
01Groot (2024-12-13 18:36:35+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Hinweise! Ich bin noch sehr neu und die Hinweise sind echt hilfreich. Ich habe die Karte nochmal angepasst.
totera (2024-12-12 23:11:04+00:00): Ciao evilworld, non so perché iD ritiene che per le linee di autobus abbia qualche utilità che il tag network sia un doppione di operator, quando invece è un'informazione fondamentale distinguere tra reti urbane ed extraurbane della stessa azienda, vista la diversa validità di biglietti, abbonamenti ecc.
Ho ripristinato quindi i precedenti valori di network.
yelisey90 (2024-12-12 22:08:12+00:00): Reverted: Even though it is called "Dighomi village" officially, it doesn't fit the OpenStreetMap definition for place=village; hence place=neighbourhood.
woodpeck (2024-12-12 13:42:53+00:00): Hallo Bai yuchen, bitte fülle den Changeset-Kommentar aus, wenn Du Daten zu OSM hochlädst, so dass andere Mapper sich einen Eindruck davon machen können, was Deine Absicht war. Danke!
cMartin (2025-01-10 09:11:15+00:00): Woodpeck, der User scheint kein gutes Händchen zu haben. Er hat bei mir in Ilmenau ganze Straßen gelöscht, legt ständig leere Wege überlappend zu straßen an und legt Radwegerelationen über Fußwege auf denen kein Radfahren erlaubt ist. Vorort ist dies auch nicht so ausgeschildert... Das Aufräumen frustriert mich grad ein wenig.