piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eerib (2026-06-24 03:52:18+00:00): Hello GGD56,

If a trail is on private property, you can mark the legal access of the trail using a legal access tag like:

access=private

This allows users to see that the trail is private and avoid it, ensures that the trail isn't accidentally re-added to OSM without a legal access tag, and ensures the data is there for emergency services that may need to use the trail to respond to an emergency. You can learn more about this topic on the following wiki page:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

Thank you, eerib
Ewen Hill (2026-06-27 02:10:51+00:00): Nice edits JDillane14 - thanks for doing this
GlavkomLVO (2026-07-04 18:16:22+00:00): Great work, comrade. Just a small correction: the 35 kV line you mapped appears to be the substation’s auxiliary power supply, not a primary incoming supply. It should not be connected to the 330 kV busbar through a 330/35 kV transformer; in this context, that configuration is technically incorrect.
MappingMore (2026-06-25 09:37:58+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184573397
FlockingFlock13 (2026-07-27 14:00:05+00:00): How do you know this is a flock camera? Odd that it's the only one in this area at all.
alpacaMaps (2026-07-31 23:10:18+00:00): The camera at this location does not appear to be Flock. If it is, please DM so we can discuss and I'll be happy to revert it!

-alpacaMaps
b-jazz (2026-06-29 17:08:22+00:00): Be careful not to overlap greens and fairways. It's okay (desired in fact) for them to touch (or share boundary nodes), but they shouldn't cross over each other. Thanks.
Supaplex (2026-06-25 05:17:53+00:00): 您好

您將私人旅遊筆記上傳到公開的開放街圖網站了，不涉及公共資訊的圖徵將被移除
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184502467
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-06-24 18:29:05+00:00): Hey,
Please be more careful when mapping highways like this one. Upon further inspection, this was actually a footpath disconnected from the road network.
Thanks!
Anusha Kodi (2026-06-25 07:51:06+00:00): Hi Flap Slimy Outward,
Thank you for your valuable feedback regarding this changeset. I will carefully implement your suggestions into my upcoming edits. Thank you for your support in improving the map.
Best regards,
Anusha
flohoff (2026-06-24 07:31:09+00:00): Ich bin auf den Changeset aufmerksam geworden wegen einer Routingänderung und dem sprachlichen "nonsense"

Daraufhin hab ich mir den angesehen und ich sehe da keinen Fehler.

Jemand hat rund um die Verkehrsinsel die beiden Fahrtrichtungen aufgeteilt. Das ist durchaus gänge Praxis das so zu machen.

Anders kannst du auch nicht die Schilder (Zeichen 222) und ggfs vorhandene Straßenlaternen auf den Verkehrsinseln nicht einzeichnen. Dazu kommt das verkehrsinseln typischerweise auch zumindest teilweise erhöhte Bordsteinkanten haben - also will man das schon einzeichnen.

Flo
pitfire (2026-06-24 09:47:14+00:00): Bei genauer Betrachtung hätten Dir aber einige Ungereimtheiten auffallen sollen. Danke für Deine Hinweise.
Eine genauere Analyse habe ich Dir als Mail verfasst.

VG pitfire
flohoff (2026-06-24 11:55:48+00:00): Deine änderung ist aufgefallen weil sie in meiner Routenüberwachung zu veränderten Zeiten/Distanzen geführt hat:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=1293594,1294615#50.74405,7.23537,16z

Gepart mit dem Changeset kommentar hab ich mir deshalb die änderung angesehen und ich halte den Revert nicht für gerechtfertigt. Das auftrennen der Fahrspuren an Verkehrsinseln ist durchaus richtig.

Flo
pitfire (2026-06-25 04:33:32+00:00): Hi Flo,
nö, das sehe ich etwas anders. Der Datensatz „Änderungssatz: 184428743„ hatte gleich mehrere Fehler: Trassentrennung ja, aber dann mit Aufsplittung der Relationen. Überwege die keine Knotenverbindung mit der Trasse hatten. Überwege auf der Fahrbahn ohne Anpassung der geänderten Konditionen. Dann besser auf den funktionsfähigen Stande zurück als alles unvollständig bis zum Nimmerleinstag liegen lassen. Kannst Du aber jederzeit anpassen.
Übrigens steinigt man nicht den Boten der Nachricht, sonder den Verursacher.
Alte Regel: Probleme mit Elementen, die zuletzt von 'pitfire' geändert wurden. Das bedeutet nicht, dass dieser Benutzer für alle diese Probleme verantwortlich ist.
VG
flohoff (2026-06-25 11:12:10+00:00): Ich habe mich hier lediglich über den changeset kommentar gewundert und das was da gemappt war war IMHO eben kein "Nonsense"

Du magst das anders sehen - Dein gutes Recht. Aber Sprachlich mit der Partikularmeinung so auszuteilen ist unangebracht.

Point made. Kann alles so bleiben bis der nächste es mit der Verkehrsinsel verbessert.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-17 05:42:16+00:00): note that you changed highway= classification of some roads in this edit

please, read and follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments and try to keep them accurate for future edits
Minh Nguyen (2026-07-17 15:13:11+00:00): The handful of classification changes appear to be incidental to the route updates in the changeset. More discussion in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wholesale-missouri-route-edits-by-ne2/145510
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-25 02:46:18+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184559252

https://osm.org/changeset/184559252
nyampire (2026-07-01 12:29:43+00:00): こんにちは、OSM Foundation Japanのいいだ（nyampire）と申します。

OSMありがとうございます、OSMへようこそ、、、

と言いたいところですが、あなたの行っている編集はいったんすべてリバート（巻き戻し）させていただきます。
理由は以下のとおりです。

* 編集に利用しているデータが、基盤地図情報の可能性が極めて高い。基盤地図情報のデータインポートは、ライセンスの競合により、許可されていません。
* 事前に相談されていないインポートである。OSMはインポートなどの大規模編集を行う際、Import Guidelineに従った手続きを事前に行う必要があります。
* 事前に相談されていない組織的編集である。金沢周辺を対象に、いくつかのアカウントがほぼ同じ活動をしています。組織として作業を行う場合、組織的編集のガイドラインに従う必要があります。

その他、投入されたデータは、既に描かれた建物と重複して登録されているなど、データ品質の面からも看過できない状況となっています。

また、別のアカウントからコメントをいただき、大学の研究でデータを利用したい、ということを伺いました。
それであれば、代替となるデータセットの紹介や、別アプローチでのアクションなども相談させていただきます。
nyampire@gmail.com までメールをいただけるよう、お手数ではありますが、指導教官あるいはリーダーに状況のエスカレーションを行ってください。
必要に応じてWeb会議などもセット可能です。
MarcoR (2026-06-24 08:26:29+00:00): Ciao e benvenuti su OpenStreetMap!

In Italia i civici vanno mappati come nodi in prossimità dell'ingresso a cui sono associati (di solito dove sta la mattonellina col numero).
Per maggiori info consulta la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses#Come_inserire_gli_indirizzi_2

Buon mapping,
Marco
sal256 (2026-06-24 06:20:37+00:00): poprawka; Altana Wojtyniów
MarcoR (2026-06-24 08:24:00+00:00): Ciao e benvenuti su OpenStreetMap!

Invece di disegnare una nuova strada sopra quella vecchia non bastava cambiare il nome di quest'ultima? :)

Buon mapping,
Marco
Miguel Iovino (2026-06-24 10:20:16+00:00): Purtroppo per me, sono un povero geometra e topografo di 75 anni e non ho avuto tempo di studiare il software. Tranquillo, però: su Google Maps l'ho fatto bene. Magari tu potresti correggere la mia imprecisione...
Miguel Iovino (2026-06-24 10:23:22+00:00): Ci sono molti altri nomi errati ed altrettanti  sensi di marcia messi a caso.
MarcoR (2026-06-24 12:56:55+00:00): Scusami se ti sono sembrato brusco, non era mia intenzione; in questo periodo sto controllando i nuovi utenti e quando trovo qualcosa di strano provo a a scrivere un commento (nella stragrande maggioranza dei casi non ricevo alcuna risposta!). Stasera, se nessuno se ne è già occupato, provo a correggere "Via Michele Manfredi".

Tra gli utenti della comunità italiana ci sono altri geometri e, in genere, persone di tutte le età.

Se trovi degli errori e non hai tempo o voglia di correggerli potresti creare una nota.

Ricordati però di non usare Google Maps o materiale coperto da copyright come fonte principale perché purtroppo non è consentito.

Buon mapping,
Marco (che a quasi cinquant'anni ancora non sa usare decentemente i GIS)
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-24 22:59:18+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the added name real?
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-24 22:59:08+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the added name real?
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-29 14:20:29+00:00): User has been blocked https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20863
eggie (2026-06-24 08:06:22+00:00): Dag Joep,

De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.
MVG
eggie
nyampire (2026-07-01 12:28:20+00:00): こんにちは、OSM Foundation Japanのいいだ（nyampire）と申します。

OSMありがとうございます、OSMへようこそ、、、

と言いたいところですが、あなたの行っている編集はいったんすべてリバート（巻き戻し）させていただきます。
理由は以下のとおりです。

* 編集に利用しているデータが、基盤地図情報の可能性が極めて高い。基盤地図情報のデータインポートは、ライセンスの競合により、許可されていません。
* 事前に相談されていないインポートである。OSMはインポートなどの大規模編集を行う際、Import Guidelineに従った手続きを事前に行う必要があります。
* 事前に相談されていない組織的編集である。金沢周辺を対象に、いくつかのアカウントがほぼ同じ活動をしています。組織として作業を行う場合、組織的編集のガイドラインに従う必要があります。

その他、投入されたデータは、既に描かれた建物と重複して登録されているなど、データ品質の面からも看過できない状況となっています。

また、別のアカウントからコメントをいただき、大学の研究でデータを利用したい、ということを伺いました。
それであれば、代替となるデータセットの紹介や、別アプローチでのアクションなども相談させていただきます。
nyampire@gmail.com までメールをいただけるよう、お手数ではありますが、指導教官あるいはリーダーに状況のエスカレーションを行ってください。
必要に応じてWeb会議などもセット可能です。
Ritam Saha (2026-07-02 18:44:40+00:00): I noticed you edited over my recent edit here. Can you tell me what was the mistake in my edit?
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-27 05:44:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13017158177

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MichS (2026-06-26 05:24:22+00:00): Hallo,

gut, dass du bei OSM mitmachen willst.

Zum Einstieg bitte diese Hilfe lesen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
Möglicherweise auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:shop

Du hast dem Geschäftsgebäude einen Namen gegeben.

Geschäfte oder Gewerbe legt man anders an. Es gibt im Gebäude Gewerbe.

MFG
ToniE (2026-06-24 07:24:46+00:00): Oops!

Bauarbeiten beendet: motor_vehicle:conditional kommt ans Ende.
motor_vehicle=yes auf secondary unnötig
kwiecpav (2026-06-25 07:41:50+00:00): Ahoj, přijde mi trochu odvážné zde kreslit ruiny zdí. Jsou zde dva zbytky zdí, každý má jenom pár metrů.
Severní strana: https://iispp.npu.cz/mis_public/documentPreview.htm?id=1168355

Jihozápadní strana: https://iispp.npu.cz/mis_public/documentPreview.htm?id=1168356

Pro širší představu posílám starou fotku z jihozápadní strany. https://owncloud.cesnet.cz/index.php/s/1ah17cbPdNngdQS
Mezi stromy je všude sníh a jenom znalec tam uvidí torzo stěny na jihozápadní straně.
S pozdravem
Pavel Kwiecien
Dvorný (2026-06-25 07:46:51+00:00): Toho stavu jsem si vědom, ale lepší způsob jak to zakreslit mě nenapadnul. Zdi jsem tedy smazal.
flohoff (2026-06-24 08:48:01+00:00): Guck dir die änderung nochmal an - Du hast an stellen wo es getrennte maxspeed:forward/maxspeed:backward gab noch zusätzlich ein "maxspeed" eingetragen.

Wenn da die Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkung symmetrisch ist müssten die :forward/:backward raus.

Hier z.b.:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24319555
Paweł_M (2026-06-24 19:12:01+00:00): Faktycznie byłem sprawdzić i brama tam jest. Dodałem do niej note, jakby ktoś uznał, że na działce drogowej nie powinno być bramy. Ogólnie trochę się rozeznałem i droga została zagrodzona nielegalnie
SENGAM (2026-06-24 19:18:56+00:00): Ja oznaczyłem dzisiaj na mapie, że jest brama i ten odcinek drogi jako prywatną. Też mi się wydaję, że ta brama jest tam nielegalnie.
yelisey90 (2026-06-24 19:02:57+00:00): 😭
Muhmaker (2026-07-04 09:17:11+00:00): Hallo mono1969, mir ist dieser Änderungssatz aufgefallen, weil die Relation für die Buslinie OV8 nun einen kleinen Fehler enthält. Dies wurde dadurch ausgelöst, dass du an der Haltestelle Moltkeplatz in Velbert die stop_position und platform vom nördlichen auf den südlichen Ast der Bismarckstraße verschoben hast. Da die verfügbaren Straßenfotos ziemlich alt und uneindeutig sind kann ich mir keinen Reim auf deine Änderung machen. Gibt es zur Zeit wirklich keine Halteposition am Moltkeplatz für Fahrten in Richtung Westen?
Grüsse, Muhmaker
eggie (2026-06-24 08:02:24+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-06-24 08:05:01+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,
Bedankt voor uw bijdrage.
De info heb ik verplaatst naar de bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
caprieldeluca (2026-06-24 16:54:31+00:00): Hi, the changes are not correct, and the changeset return warnings in JOSM. Please contact the OSM Argentina community.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto
ParmaCanal (2026-06-26 06:27:52+00:00): Hi caprieldeluca, Thanks for reaching out. The changes I made in this changeset were to reclassify [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162154220] and [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162154206]. The only validation warning present is on [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162154206] that I believe is referring to [https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13936668687] which is part of the same route relation as the way I reclassified - [https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3666626] -  and seems to be missing a role value. However this node was not part of my edits and as I have no information on the bus stops of this route, I’m not able to confirm if this node should be included in the route or not.Hi caprieldeluca, Thanks for reaching out. The changes I made in this changeset were to reclassify [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162154220] and [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162154206]. The only validation warning present is on [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162154206] that I believe is referring to [https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13936668687] which is part of the same route relation as the way I reclassified - [https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3666626] -  and seems to be missing a role value. However this node was not part of my edits and as I have no information on the bus stops of this route, I’m not able to confirm if this node should be included in the route or not.
caprieldeluca (2026-06-26 17:10:12+00:00): Thanks for replying. The error JOSM is returning is due to the unnamed highway. 
I don't understand why you are removing the links to our routes, leaving the map with unnamed highways after each edit.
Please correct all them or provide a explanation as to why they aren't links for you.
ParmaCanal (2026-06-29 08:27:50+00:00): Hello caprieldeluca, My apologies for the oversight in not adding the name to way 162154206 after updating it to base classification.

My reasoning for using the base highway classification is that this roadway appears to function as a branch of the main road rather than a separate connecting road based on the wiki which states that *_link roads are "not the main line of either of the highways being linked but form the connection between them,” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link). Although it serves a dedicated turning movement, it splits directly from the parent road and there is no channelized physical separation between https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4571981580 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1740891290. 

I've also noticed similar nearby junctions, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1373574968, that are mapped using the base highway classification. Because of this, it seems these types of junctions can be somewhat subjective and are not always mapped consistently in Argentina. Is there an Argentina-specific guideline or community consensus that expands on this interpretation? I'd appreciate any documentation you can share so I can better align my edits with local mapping practices in the future.

That said, I'm happy to restore the way to its previous link classification if that is the established local convention. Thank you for taking the time to discuss this with me, and I appreciate your patience.
caprieldeluca (2026-06-30 16:07:48+00:00): Please, answer in the local community discussion:
- https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ediciones-de-apple-data-team-adt/144819/5
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-06-25 13:53:44+00:00): Hi! Please do not change alignement or number of lanes/transitions while adding turn lanes. The motorways in Quebec west of the A55 were all aligned precisely using geodesic data. The east will also be completed by our team soon. For any question or new configurations that you may find, please contact us first. Thanks and have a nice day.
sbedwal_Lyft (2026-06-30 04:52:46+00:00): Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy,
My name is Santosh, and I am a mapper on the OpenStreetMap team at Lyft.Thank you for bringing this to my attention and for taking the time to point out the mistake.
After reviewing the changes, I realized the issue was due to my oversight. I missed the placement=transition tag and updated the lane information instead. I'll make sure not to change the alignment or the number of lanes/transitions when adding turn lanes in the future. I am sorry for the mistake and any inconvenience it may have caused. I’ll also pay additional attention and train the team on such cases, so we do not edit such cases in the future
Thank you again and happy mapping!
Best regards,
Santosh
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-02 07:23:39+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other mistagging for POI

https://osm.org/changeset/184958530
Drogowiec123 (2026-07-08 13:42:03+00:00): Naprawdę ta kapliczka się tak nazywa?
Marek-M (2026-07-08 17:45:03+00:00): Oczywiście, że tak się nie nazywa. Przerzuciłem tą nazwę do opisu:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185358193
eggie (2026-06-24 09:03:01+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. Alleen een naam zal niets doen.. Geef ook de aard van het bedrijf aan.
Bv office=company
Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-06-24 09:11:48+00:00): Bedrijfstag toegevoegd
Sanniu (2026-06-24 14:45:37+00:00): Hi, יעל רום street is pretty far from this point, are you sure that it is correct address? Or maybe the street here is misnamed?
OmerMadlan (2026-06-25 10:53:01+00:00): Hi, thanks a lot for the correction. 
The address was indeed on the wrong street. We’ve now updated it to the correct location.
Thank you.
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-24 22:58:40+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the added name real?
ivanbranco (2026-06-25 09:18:39+00:00): They seem directions to somewhere. They should be deleted
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-24 22:58:36+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the added name real?
eggie (2026-06-24 09:08:46+00:00): Dag Zero,

De info heb ik wederom verplaatst naar de adresnode. Svp niet dubbletaggen. Gebruik alleen de adresnode.

MVG
eggie
Zero Latency VR (2026-06-24 17:16:11+00:00): Hartelijk dank!
bxl-forever (2026-06-24 09:44:31+00:00): Hello,

We had tried to get in touch with you multiple times to explain the problem caused by those SEO edits.

You have repeatedly ignored all our suggestions and kept on editing.

Please do not misuse OSM for a promotional platform. In an attempt to gain more visibility for your customers, you erased existing information from the map.  This is not acceptable.

* You erased the name of this residential building (Résidence Charlemagne) to replace it with the name of your client (the fitness club on nbr 1).
* Despite this building has multiple addresses, you added a single address to the building itself
* You did not even care to write a valid street name, instead you invented free-style abbreviations to write it.
* Some tags are just silly and won’t validate: "lu-ve de 9 à 20.30 h - sa-di de 99 à 19 h" is impossible to parse as opening hours, even the Saturday hours were not written with proper care.

Out of courtesy for your customer, instead of bluntly reverting all your changes, we kindly mapped the fitness club as a node:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13961944847
LySioS (2026-06-24 14:03:12+00:00): Salut, 
Les tags me paraissent bons. Tu as mis access=no sur la station de charge, c'est normal ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184513010
RP Carto (2026-06-24 15:31:33+00:00): Merci pour ta relecture. Pour access=no, j'ai voulu faire comme sur le wiki des stations de charges pour restreindre aux vélos en transposant la méthode : "bus=yes . Si l'installation est uniquement pour les bus, utiliser access=no et bus=designated"
LySioS (2026-06-24 18:43:15+00:00): ah oui, bien vu
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-27 05:44:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531882058

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bernward1 (2026-07-01 07:07:39+00:00): Diese Änderung stimmt nicht.
Die Busse von Kellberg fahren nicht über Buttermark. Dort werden nur einige Kurzstreckenbusse eingesetzt
bernward1 (2026-07-01 07:09:54+00:00): Ich hab mich vertan, Buttermarkt ist richtig, aber - Im Broel - ist falsch.
ieguy3 (2026-06-24 09:07:52+00:00): https://myvalleynews.com/blog/2026/01/17/murrieta-schedules-hearing-on-proposed-sparkman-drive-name-change/
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-27 05:44:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531884983

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
LoekVe (2026-07-16 15:51:07+00:00): Hi, it seems geometry is not following accurately anymore the real situation after your edit. What was the reason to change geometry? Also for instance the connection to the parking is removed now.
LoekVe (2026-07-16 18:26:01+00:00): And also, I see now, some parking roads have been removed, like here: 51.40424043, 5.42096857. Why this was done? Would it be possible to restore all changes?
emvee (2026-07-22 19:22:15+00:00): Reverted using https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186195551
emvee (2026-07-17 20:01:14+00:00): Like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184513917 I do think this changeset does not improve the map.

What is you source for doing this change, "PDOK aerial imagery Beeldmateriaal.nl 7,5cm (WMTS)" is not showing what you mapped.
emvee (2026-07-22 19:21:00+00:00): Reverted via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186195551
emvee (2026-07-22 19:23:46+00:00): Sorry, wrong changeset, that was for the other changeset. Correct link to the revert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186195476
flohoff (2026-06-24 13:57:57+00:00): Hi,
please revisit this change. It broke the routing on this junction:

red -> old / Green - New - You introduced some oneways to much:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=1219422,1294793#50.96089,7.985,18z
Shre_WD (2026-06-24 17:37:44+00:00): Hi flohoff, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
flohoff (2026-06-25 11:23:07+00:00): Okay - i fixed it - the middle cross needs to get the oneways removed which means the destination tags need to be made destination:forward - Also i added the 4 turn restrictions from the corresponding trunk_links onto the crossing roads.

I should get a routing update within 30 minutes if it fixes it.
flohoff (2026-06-25 13:50:06+00:00): Here is the routing update - works now as expected:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=1294744,1295351#50.96095,7.98552,18z
Shre_WD (2026-06-25 16:59:36+00:00): Hi flohoff, thank you for bringing the issue to my attention. I seem to have missed checking all oneway tags after modifying the junction. I will be more careful with my future edits, ensuring that I review my changes thoroughly before uploading them.
thebrad1111 (2026-06-24 09:27:32+00:00): Used mapbox imagery, cadastral parcels with a bit of bing imagery for checking. Forgot to add source tag