piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dgmapping (2023-06-15 18:47:49+00:00): Hi dseiko! Currently you deleted the whole building. If the business is no longer operating in there, but the building still exists, only the relevant tags should be removed.

I restored the building, so this issue should be resolved.
Warin61 (2026-03-21 03:53:53+00:00): Relation roles corrected
Frans S (2023-06-16 10:27:43+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
Please solve the issues on the Issue triangle before you upload your work.
Never let a road cross a building !
Best regards
Frans S (2023-06-16 10:34:28+00:00): Hi again.
Another issue.
When roads are crossing each other, please connect both nodes.
NikolaiJackson (2023-06-16 16:07:40+00:00): i dont see where the road crosses building
Frans S (2023-06-17 08:27:52+00:00): Hello You are right. 
I used the wrong sentence from my template. 
It should be:
Connected node of highway to another feature. Here a land use issue. 
Best regards
Buffty (2023-07-12 18:00:30+00:00): Hallo daerich,
mit diesem Änderungssatz hast du Fußgängerüberwege als "way" eingefügt, die jetzt zum Teil im "Nichts" enden. "highway=footway" zusammen mit "footway=crossing" wird aber nur verwendet, um
- separat kartierte Bürgersteige (z.B. "footway=sidewalk") zu verbinden (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:footway=crossing) oder
- damit eine Fußgängerinsel darzustellen (dann zusammen mit "crossing:island=yes", siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:crossing:island).
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182256744 ist daher falsch, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182256743 ist nur zwischen "Neue Straße" und "highway=pedestrian" "Martin-Luther-Platz" korrekt.
Ich werde das bei Gelegenheit korrigieren, wollte dich aber darauf hinweisen.
vg, Buffty
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-06-15 16:04:00+00:00): Hi Amiri, 
This changeset broke a lot of relations. Can you please fix them?
Frans S (2023-06-16 10:18:42+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please map highways all the way you can see.
Not just small pieces. 
See also the guidelines I copied to you on another changeset.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137372157
tontonfabrice (2023-06-18 01:33:18+00:00): Bonjour,
je me suis permit de faire quelques corrections sur votre circuit "Tour du Haut Bois" 
Merci de les consulter.
tontonfabrice (2023-06-20 15:19:21+00:00): Pouvez vous s'il vous plait, suivre les modifications que j'ai fais sur ce parcours, lorsque que vous cartographié d'autres circuits?
Aussi je vous remercie de votre participation .
rainerU (2023-06-16 09:16:07+00:00): Bonjour,

vous avez ajouté tunnel=yes à un chemin qui passe sous un bâtiment. Dans ce cas, il faut mettre cet attribut uniquement sur la partie du chemin qui se trouve sous le bâtiment. Pour cela, on découpe le chemin sur des point communs au chemin et au bâtiment. Voir le wiki pour plus de détails :

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:tunnel#tunnel=building_passage
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137372570
Taya_S (2023-06-16 08:04:18+00:00): Hello Hannes,

This is quite a bit more than just "add building". 

You also seem to have changed a river in to natural=sand. Might want to look in to that. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1229169/history 

Sincerely,
Taya
FraukeLeo (2023-07-24 04:44:29+00:00): Hallo, ins name-Tag eines Weges gehört nur der Name des Weges selbst. Eine Wanderroute, die den Weg benutzt, wird als Relation erfasst. Die Extratour Hochrhöntour z.B. als https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1026672. Diese Relationen können in Karten und Navi-Apps hervorgehoben dargestellt werden. Es gibt keine Notwendigkeit dafür, den Routennamen zusätzlich an die einzelnen Wege zu setzen.
Mex (2023-06-22 21:16:06+00:00): Not sure on your tagging on this one, I would expect tags such as the Lifecyle disused:amenity and name:old
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137373872
Milaviy4 (2023-07-02 19:30:18+00:00): Does this section countinue somewhere? like towards Mrkonjić Grad? Are there any plans for this particluar highway
Colbertson (2023-06-15 15:20:10+00:00): What language is name:tok? Cant find it on the wiki. Also would be nice if you had more info in the changeset comment.
ivanbranco (2023-06-15 16:55:57+00:00): @Colbertson: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toki_Pona apparently
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-07 07:09:53+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and other tags for Mova Law Group POI in changeset 183765947

https://osm.org/changeset/183765947
Andrea Musuruane (2023-06-15 18:45:07+00:00): Ciao. Non va ancora bene. Il 9a e il 10 non possono essere dallo stesso lato della strada. Il 10 deve essere a destra e il 9 a sinistra. Ciao, Andrea
silversurfer83 (2023-06-16 07:26:46+00:00): Hello Damir,

please read and understand the following article of the OSM Wiki. This is a collaborative project where communication is key. Part of that communication is a good change set comment as a curtesy to your fellow mappers. Thank you.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-15 15:20:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Brzozowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10979122933

"Mikołaja Reja":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10979122942
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10979122945
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10979122951

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Taya_S (2023-06-15 17:15:27+00:00): Hello,

thank you for making half a dozen changesets to different countries with the comment "...", this really tells us a lot. 
In the future please actually explain what you are doing. its very annoying to figure out whats changed right now. Something like
"added name:tok tag" would have sufficed. 

I'd also like to point you to this changeset discussion on adding Toki Pona names that could very well be relevant https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130767955
woodpeck (2023-06-16 10:43:10+00:00): 0-hour block issued asking user to use proper changeset comments in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7211
WR87 (2023-06-15 15:18:35+00:00): Korrektur: Kirchweg 31
Erelen (2023-06-15 21:25:42+00:00): But why???
TheEdgeOfRage (2023-06-15 22:18:22+00:00): Because the building has multiple entrances with different addresses. I have to check exactly what the numbers are for the other ones and I'll add them tomorrow
Erelen (2023-06-15 22:30:56+00:00): Oh, what a complex world! :) Thanks!
user_5359 (2023-06-16 14:25:56+00:00): Hello! Please take a look at the road https://www.osm.org/way/1182285141. May I ask a question about the meaning of highway_1. A road can either be a secondary road or a sidewalk. If there is a separate area for pedestrians next to the road, the key sidewalk (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key%3Asidewalk) is usually used. The key highway_1 is not evaluated. Am I missing something here or can we improve the data?
MooPoo7 (2023-06-16 15:26:06+00:00): That tag was already there when I was editing, probably leftover from an import to designate that there was a sidewalk along the road. I didn't have time to fix it so I just left it since it wasn't causing any issues. Feel free to add the sidewalk as its own way or add proper sidewalk tags to the road!
maraf24 (2023-06-16 11:43:11+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
fkv (2023-06-15 22:54:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137391938 where the changeset comment is: revert 137378350
gpserror (2023-06-15 17:58:36+00:00): Hi, as for our naming convention in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions the designator "Ln" should be spelled out as "Lane."
aceman444 (2023-10-18 21:15:18+00:00): I doubt there is concrete at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222940172 . More like asphalt. Please pay more attention.
Yunan973 (2023-07-31 14:42:24+00:00): Hi,

in the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15981673, what is the meaning of source=10 ?

Best regards
aceman444 (2023-10-18 21:50:48+00:00): Really? There is a zebra marked crossing, so it is official, in no way informal. What are you trying to do here? Almost everything you added in the area is wrong. Do I have to check all of your changesets?
Frans S (2023-06-16 10:11:38+00:00): Hello. Please read the instructions which imagery to be used. Bing, as used by You, is strongly discouraged
About tagging of highways. 
previous mappers used the tag footway. In rural areas like here, you need to tag very small traces as path.
How to measure the width of a trace In Ideditor:
Command Ctr+shift+M  shows the measuring dimensions tab.
After that command, select add line.
Zoom in very far (20 - 25 mtr) so that you have a good view on the shoulders of a road.
Then draw a line between the shoulders.
You can read the value in the measurement tab. (select Metric value)
<2 mtr tag it Path
> 2 mtr tag it unclassified, residential or track depending on the situation. 
 Delete the line after measuring.
See the wiki African highways to decide which tag to be used.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137380285
Kiekin (2023-06-16 09:59:17+00:00): Werden die Hausnummern "Zum Mühlenberg" 27-35 in Storchenweg 27-35 geändert? Oder werden die Gebäude der Straße neu nummeriert?
bwbuz (2023-06-17 07:18:15+00:00): Das kann ich dir nicht beantworten...habe diese Gebäude aber mal zur Erinnerung mal mit einem entsprechenden fixme versehen. Hier müssen wir ja ohnehin noch mehrfach ran, sobald es hinreichend gute Luftbilder zu den dort bereits entstehenden Neubauten gibt. Das Liegenschaftskataster ist nocht nicht aktualisiert worden.
Frans S (2023-06-16 09:30:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. We welcome you as a new mapper.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings do not meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. ( see attached document for more info)
A: Not accurately drawn.
E. Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137380747
skfd (2024-05-15 02:26:12+00:00): hi! more correct tag in that case would be foot=use_sidepath with sidewalk tags.
DaveTO (2024-05-15 10:32:07+00:00): I don't get it. I was just trying to follow the convention here: we don't typically tag roads in Ontario/Toronto with foot=yes tags as it was done in changeset 34227717. It is not safe or expected for pedestrians to walk on roads.

If we want to tag foot=use_sidepath on this road because there is a sidewalk, how is any other road any different? The sidewalk is already mapped separately, so any routing apps can easily direct pedestrians to follow the sidewalk.

All that said, I don't see any reason to tag this particular road as foot=no either, since, again, this isn't different from any other minor road where pedestrians are not supposed to be walking along. There's quite a bit of car traffic down this road, to boot.
skfd (2024-05-15 16:07:48+00:00): yeah use_sidepath is a way to say there is a sidewalk and whole Road as a combination of sidewalk and carpath is walkable. It is not a big deal for sure, sorry
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-16 14:07:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137413707 where the changeset comment is: Incompletely discussed mechanical edits - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7215 and links from there.
Frans S (2023-06-16 09:26:12+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
We welcome you as a new mapper.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but a few mappings do not meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. ( see attached document for more info)
A: Not accurately drawn.
G: include the shadow of a building in the mapping.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137381376
rainerU (2023-06-16 09:04:39+00:00): Bonjour,

Bienvenu dans la communauté OSM et merci pour vos contributions autour du Boulou. 

Dans ce groupe de modifications, vous avez changé plusieurs chemins de highway=path en highway=cycleway. Ce n'est pas faux, mais en général on utilise highway=path + bicycle=designated + foot=designated pour les voies vertes signalées par un panneau C115 : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Voies_vertes

rainerU
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137381675
Frans S (2023-06-16 09:22:49+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping.
On this task, many high-rise buildings are incorrect mapped.
You will see both one or more side walls and the roof. The Imagery is taken under a certain angle, so you will see more .
Often all visible walls and roofs are mapped as 1 building.
The correct way is to map the roofline and move the whole object on their footprint.
See this video.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link
Best regards
SomeoneElse (2023-06-15 17:00:35+00:00): Please use better changeset comments than simply "fix".
avinet_ua (2023-06-15 17:04:17+00:00): ok
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-16 14:07:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137413707 where the changeset comment is: Incompletely discussed mechanical edits - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7215 and links from there.
Jordi MF (2023-07-03 14:38:11+00:00): Hola Esgl,
Gracias por mejorar los datos de OSM. He visto que has añadido una cantera encima de otra cantera que recientemente se había mapeado. En OSM solo debe haber un nodo o área por cada elemento que exista en la realidad. Por lo tanto, eliminaré este duplicado.
Saludos,
Jordi
hatul (2023-08-21 20:48:18+00:00): בכוונה הפכת את ספריית שביל ישראל לעץ או שזו טעות?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5737015522
zstadler (2023-08-22 04:57:19+00:00): התיוג כספריה נשאר. נוסף תיוג של העץ שתחתיו היא נמצאת
hatul (2023-08-22 06:18:27+00:00): לא עדיף להפריד לנקודה נפרדת? אין בין הספרייה לעץ ממש קשר.
zstadler (2023-08-22 06:30:04+00:00): סבבה  תפריד
JFK73 (2023-06-16 14:14:18+00:00): Bonjour
Quelle est la source employée pour délimiter le périmètre de ce "champ de tir" ? Terrain, open data ?
Merci d'avance
vince212 (2023-06-20 20:53:08+00:00): Bonjour, c'est le plan dispo sur le site FFR.
JFK73 (2023-08-17 14:31:09+00:00): Bonjour
Ok merci pour votre réponse. S'agissant d'un terrain militaire, les valeurs leisure=pitch + sport=shooting ont été remplacé par landuse=military + military=range qui sont plus spécifiques.
Frans S (2023-06-16 09:06:55+00:00): Hello. I noticed that you are a new mapper. I reviewed a number of mappings you uploaded and am disappointed about the quality you deliver. See those comments, and please take the remarks into account.
Best regards
cserpell (2023-06-16 01:18:39+00:00): Hola, muchas gracias por todos los colegios agregados. En este caso había un área alrededor marcada con este colegio, así que eliminé la etiqueta de este edificio en particular.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137383967
Diabolo68 (2023-06-15 18:37:50+00:00): Utilisation également de l'imagerie aérienne SPW
surveyor54 (2023-06-16 12:35:38+00:00): Hi,
building:levels=15  😲

Ist das Gebäude denn so hoch?

Viele Grüße
Map-Noob (2023-06-16 14:53:45+00:00): Sorry, das sollte die Adresse werden.
surveyor54 (2023-06-17 06:54:41+00:00): 👍
surveyor54 (2023-06-17 06:55:24+00:00): Bitte auch korrigieren.
bxl-forever (2023-06-15 19:25:02+00:00): Hello.

In this changeset, you removed two buildings that appear to be still there (in Bing Maps Aerial which iD claims you have been using, and in Mapbox Satellite too).
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88006980/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177545021/history

Were those buildings razed recently?

If that is the case, it is adviseable to say so in the changeset title.  When users with few contributions start deleting buildings or landmarks and hide their changes under a vague "Some minor changes" title, you could easily understand that it raises suspicions.

Would you mind providing some more info please?
limes11 (2023-06-15 19:34:31+00:00): Hi

he explained it here: 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/nod
e/10979344668

but why he also touched nodes on Tristan da Cunha, we don't know, of course.
ITRECKS (2023-06-15 20:09:18+00:00): Hi bxl-forever and limes 11,
I live in the city Bad Harzburg, Germany. The building "Kursaal" was demolished recently (https://www.goslarsche.de/lokales/bad-harzburg_artikel,-bad-harzburger-kursaal-wird-dem-erdboden-gleichgemacht-_arid,2873072.html) Unfortunately the link is behind a paywall. The building doesn't exist anymore.
I relocated the position of the signpost and the welcome-sign in TDC according to this video: (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXESuiUJ-j4) Perhaps some other changes in TDC will follow.
(Please excuse my poor english)
limes11 (2023-06-15 20:44:06+00:00): Hi ITRECKS, 

bitte mische dann keine Änderungen in TDC mit Änderungen in Deutschland. Verwende unterschiedliche Changesets für verschiedene Regionen, insbesondere wenn tausende Kilometer dazwischen liegen. Danke!
silversurfer83 (2023-06-16 07:32:42+00:00): Good morning :)

the two main principles that limes11 bxl-forever are hinting at are
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Please also take a look at 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

When objects are removed in reality but are still visible at the usual aerial images please do not delete them. People at their computers will think they are missing and retrace the outlines. Take a look at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix for more information.

I know that things here can be a bit (a lot?) confusing and complicated so please don't hesitate to ask others for help. Here are some places where people might be helpful:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers

happy mapping
silversurfer83
ITRECKS (2023-06-16 08:52:33+00:00): Hi,
thank you everyone for the information given. I am still relatively inexperienced in openstreetmap and would like to learn something new.
Black_Diamond (2023-12-17 06:02:10+00:00): Actually, this is the Vista del Lago Condominiums. I find the current addr:housenumber values to be very suspect. The Santa Clara County Tax Assessor disagrees with the current addr:housenumber values assigned to these buildings. The area is divided into 4 main addresses at 121,151 Buckingham Drive and 120,150 Saratoga Avenue. Each of those main addresses have multiple addr:unit values.

None of the buildings seem to be apartments. They seem to be townhouses in the Vista del Lago Condominium complex. From a taxing and ownership perspective, that's an important distinction.

I recommend checking out this website for the scope of the area in question. https://www.remax.com/homes-for-sale/ca/santa-clara/vista-del-lago-condominiums/neighborhood/1012382
impiaaa (2023-12-17 15:34:59+00:00): I just fixed a mistake where each building was labeled as a residential land use/apartment complex, instead of a building, and building=apartments is the correct tag for condo buildings: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dapartments
mueschel (2023-06-18 10:43:29+00:00): Hi,
the tag "horsepowerlimit" is not used in other places. Can you explain what is allowed here?
Timohotep (2023-06-30 14:34:22+00:00): Yes, this lake only allows for boats up to 30 horsepower (correction 35 horsepower). It is a common problem for people to arrive with boats that are too powerful and cited by NYSDEC.
mueschel (2023-06-30 14:48:03+00:00): Thanks!
I suggest to use a "conditional" tag instead of a new tag.

boat:conditional = no @ (power > 35 hp)

This is not used yet, but it follows a defined syntax and can at least be displayed to the user by tools that support conditional restrictions.
gscholz (2023-06-17 06:08:03+00:00): Hi padvinder,
your edits tend to leave behind errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=4.68168&lat=52.62313&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this? You may want to think about how to avoid this type of error, as it seems to be systematic for your work.
Kind regards
Guido
padvinder (2023-06-17 21:54:26+00:00): Hallo Guido,
vreemd: op een enkele na vind ik geen van de aangegeven duplicates. Heb jij ze soms al weggehaald?
Ik zal uiteraard proberen duplicates te voorkomen. 
groet
padvinder
gscholz (2023-06-24 06:25:26+00:00): Hi padvinder,
meanwile I have fixed a lot of those errors, but you tend to create new ones every day like here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137687384

To fix those you can use the OSM inspector view above. It is update once per day at about 00:00 h UTC. Just klick on the magenta markings and open the error with your favorite editor.
Guido
JJIglesias (2023-06-15 19:49:14+00:00): Saludos. Una pregunta: la Posta Llojeta sigue existiendo o se traslado a otra parte? Con la integracion de area q existe, borraste la posta, y creaste una edificacion gigante cuando en realidad es un area. Ya hice las correcciones pertinentes, pero necesito confirmar que paso con la Posta Llojeta?
Gracias
JJ
Chiplex (2023-06-17 01:02:36+00:00): Buenas tardes, Actualmente Soy funcionario de la alcaldía, trabajo en aquel lugar con el que se denomina  "Entidad Descentralizada Municipal de Maquinaria y Equipo" ya hace más tres años, la Posta Llojeta sigue existiendo, pero ahora ocupa todo el área cual mi persona ha editado, hice el cambio como actualización del área, solicito amablemente pueda restaurar los cambios qu realice, mi persona cuenta puedo proporcionar suficiente informacion para corroborar que mi persona actualmente trabaja allí, con mucho gusto colaboraré, muchas gracias de antemano.
JJIglesias (2023-06-17 07:01:52+00:00): Saludos NO dudamos de tu palabra de ninguna manera, solo q borraste la Posta y es lo q necesitabamos confirmar. El area esta como la editaste, con pequeñas correcciones. La Preocupacion era la Posta.
JJIglesias (2023-06-17 07:09:30+00:00): Ya la restituimos y dibujamos las edificaciones notables que hay dentro de esa area. Si deseas contribuir al mapa desde tu celular te sugerimos las aplicaciones OrganicMaps y StreetComplete, y si quieres aportar fotos la aplicacion seria Mapillary.
Saludos
JJ
Cebderby (2023-06-18 14:37:55+00:00): highway=busway is correct for the bus only way, it's just that it's unfortunately not yet rendered on the standard map.  I found you'd also dragged a few nodes out of position while editing, be careful when moving the map around, all is fixed up. Please make sure the changeset comments correspond with what you've actually intended to change.
user_18305684 (2023-06-15 18:48:42+00:00): sorry for the comment, previous changeset !
The good changeset is = improve connexion waterways