piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Dimitar155 (2024-02-02 14:21:02+00:00): Hi aezter,

You haven't put anything in the shelter field for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11193809621. Can you fix it when possible?

Happy mapping,
Dimitar
Argbjorn (2023-09-15 20:55:01+00:00): You've drew nonexistent buildings and broke geometry of existing ones. Please, don't do that.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141307371
Argbjorn (2023-09-15 20:52:55+00:00): Hi, Tammo. You've drew nonexistent buildings and broke geometry of existing ones. Please, don't do that.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141307434
Johnwhelan (2023-09-17 22:41:50+00:00): Why are you mapping untagged ways?
i2004 (2023-09-15 15:30:58+00:00): te hice la 154
Frans S (2023-09-20 13:29:19+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not add a layer=1 to a building. It is not hanging in the air.
When you added it to hide an error, solve the error please.
Best regards
yugen383 (2023-09-21 15:05:50+00:00): Hi, thanks for the comment. I don't remember adding it voluntarily, it was probably an accident, I'll pay more attention next time.
Carto'Cité (2023-09-15 16:03:28+00:00): Bonjour.

Quelle est votre source ? Je ne trouve pas cette information sur https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/gares-de-voyageurs/, or cette information m'intéresse au plus haut point :-)

Antoine.
Sammyhawkrad (2024-02-22 21:03:12+00:00): Hello Benedicta, why did you add "Wine and liquor shop" as the description of this ATM https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5776851160? It seems out of place for me.
Glassman (2023-09-15 20:30:57+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

I haven't been there, but it looks like this is a trail, which is marked as a path in OSM. Again, it's all because OSM started in England.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141308739
julcnx (2024-04-24 08:59:33+00:00): Hey, thank you for your contributions! I noticed you've marked some roads as 'living_street.' One tip for future edits: you should tag these as 'highway=residential' instead. This is because there aren't any rules in Thailand that specifically lower speed limits or give pedestrians priority in residential areas.
You can read more about this on the Thailand wiki. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Cheers
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Urban_and_Local_Road_wide_enough_for_motor_cars
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141308761
Metzor (2023-09-15 17:22:41+00:00): Hi GongGobbler23,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) 

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset
GongGobbler23 (2023-09-15 19:28:05+00:00): Alright, I'll keep that in mind going forward, thanks for letting me know.
Sandal man (2023-09-15 18:21:05+00:00): Hello,
Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)
But please make smalle change sets, this helps others in tracking changes. 
Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thank you.
GongGobbler23 (2023-09-15 19:29:15+00:00): I'll take note of that, thanks for letting me know!
trigpoint (2023-09-17 13:21:39+00:00): Also the concept of StreetComplete is that you mke edits that you can see in front of you. How were you able to make changes in both the US and Germany?
GongGobbler23 (2023-09-17 16:35:43+00:00): I was travelling in the US and that was when I had finally decided to contribute to OSM and downloaded StreetComplete. Yet I didn't bother with making an account until I got back to Germany. That's also why those international edits are bundled together.
Henry572 (2023-09-15 18:19:01+00:00): Hallo Felix1337,
Erstmal willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und danke für deine ersten Bearbeitungen.
Ich fürchte aber, dass bei dieser hier etwas schiefgegangen ist und deine Bearbeitung nicht dem entspricht, was du machen wolltest, stattdessen hast du die Brücke der Fesserstraße etwas verformt. Das ist kein Problem und passiert halt am Anfang ab und zu. Ich kann das wieder korrigieren und dann kannst du das machen was du eigentlich bearbeiten wolltest.
Gruß, Hendrik
Henry572 (2023-09-15 18:31:39+00:00): Ich habe durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141315135 die Änderungen rückgängig gemacht, also die Brücke wieder an ihren alten Platz geschoben, jetzt kannst du übernehmen.
MapMagics (2023-09-15 16:01:57+00:00): Correction: Comment is "Added service road in Coronel, Provincia de Concepción, Biobío Region. #adt".
mcliquid (2023-09-18 15:12:25+00:00): Warum hast du die Schnellladestation gelöscht? Wurde diese schon wieder abgebaut? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10095575644/history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141309279
Agi on tour (2023-09-18 18:40:36+00:00): Es waren zwei separate nodes erfasst.
Da beide vom selben Operator betrieben werden, habe ich sie zusammengefasst und mich dabei hieran orientiert (engl. Wiki): "A charging station may represent one individual charge point (without others close to it) or a group of charge points at a location. Different brands/operators on the same location should be mapped separately."

Wenn beide denselben Betreiber haben, macht es mehr Sinn, diese auf einem Knoten abzubilden, weil Änderungen am Betreiber dann eben nur einmal durchgeführt werden müssen.

Wenn du dir das erste Beispiel im Wiki anschaust, dann siehst du auch, dass ganz unterschiedliche Ladesäulen in einem Knoten zusammengefasst werden.

Dieses Zusammenfassen war aber eigentlich nur eine 'Nebenanpassung'.
Hauptziel war es, den Ladepunkt mit den Informationen zu ergänzen bezüglich socket:type* und socket:type*:output. Dies sind wichtige Angaben für den Entscheid, ob man hier laden kann/will.
Der Ladepunkt enthält nun die Informationen bezüglich Steckertyp und 'Geschwindigkeit' für AC und DC laden. Es ist somit keine Information verloren gegangen.
Agi on tour (2023-09-18 18:45:27+00:00): Ich habe übrigens am 9.9. dort mein Motorrad geladen. Ich wollte eigentlich nicht dort durchfahren, suchte aber eine 'Umgehung' der allgemeinen Alpabfahrt im Bregenzerwald, welche mich auf dem falschen Fuss erwischt hatte. Ich war froh, ohne Unfall durchzukommen, weil ich km weise auf 'frisch gedüngten' tw. auch sonst noch feuchten und abfallenden Strassen fahren musste. Eine dreistündige Putzaktion erwartete mich zu Hause dann zusätzlich.
Aber ich will das nicht als Reklamation verstanden haben; ich bin selber auf einem Milchwirtschaftsbetrieb aufgewachsen ;-).
topius (2023-09-16 07:14:54+00:00): Bare rock is reserved for hard rock surfaces. Loose rock material in riverbeds should be tagged as shingle. And please follow the outline as precise as possible. I adjusted it, have a look.
spiregrain (2023-09-15 16:41:32+00:00): Bravo!  The system works.
Sandal man (2023-09-15 18:19:38+00:00): Hello,
Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)
But please make smalle change sets, this helps others in tracking changes. 
Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thank you.
impiaaa (2023-09-15 16:57:06+00:00): It's proper to duplicate tags across the building outline and relation, since not all data consumers support building relations. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings#Building_outlines
spughetti (2023-09-15 17:06:07+00:00): My bad! Thanks for pointing that out :)

I've reverted my changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141312284
laurent-38 (2023-10-18 20:32:19+00:00): Bonjour ldez,

les cédez-le-passage ne doivent pas être positionnés sur une intersection de routes, car il devient impossible de savoir à quelle route il s'appliquent. 
De plus, il est inutile de les mettre sur les accès à un giratoire, car tous les routeurs savent qu'il faut céder le passage en entrant sur un giratoire.

Je supprime donc les cédez-le-passage sur le giratoire https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481296218 

Cordialement
~~
laurent
Frans S (2023-09-16 09:24:29+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please focus on mapping buildings and roads which connects houses, settlements and villages. Tracks leading to farmland are not important.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2023-09-16 09:47:05+00:00): Hello again
* Please be sure that the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.
watmildon (2023-09-27 02:46:15+00:00): I applaud your desire to accurately map various golf courses. However, there's a few issues that must be addressed with the changes here. In particular, The trees should be a node with natural=tree and not marked as golf=rough. If you want to mark the area as rough, you should make another way for that information.

I encourage you to review this page about golf mapping as it will help you avoid common mistakes folks make. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course

If you aren't able to make the necessary improvements, that's okay, it's not too difficult to revert the changes and let another mapper have a go at it.
watmildon (2023-09-27 03:08:01+00:00): I thought maybe you were new (my mistake) but I see you have a lot of golf edits. So, what's the story with these trees? You've done something pretty deliberate but also very... odd.  Is there something particular you're trying to accomplish with this tagging?

Would love to hear what the idea is so I could have a bit of insight.
ChromeLotus (2023-09-18 16:25:07+00:00): Correction: Source used was Bing aerial imagery; Mapillary
Metzor (2023-09-15 17:34:42+00:00): Hi cmrj,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) 

I assume you just wanted to add one path. But you also change the following relation:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2641546/history

Please repair the tagging if it the change of the relation was a mistake. Thanks. If you have questions: Happy to help you.


One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset
Olaf der Mapper (2023-09-15 18:26:57+00:00): lol
Argbjorn (2023-09-15 20:49:19+00:00): Hi, Matchavariani. Why did you broke geometry of existing buildings? Please, don't do that.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141310813
VictorIE (2026-02-18 10:33:42+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553520199/

An old edit, but access=private seems off.
jonnymccullagh (2026-02-18 11:19:22+00:00): Agree. Good catch.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-09-16 09:55:42+00:00): Hi, why you remove "Chùa Láng" as from member of this turn restriction?
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-09-19 22:06:23+00:00): I decide to delete this relation because it will prevent car/motorcycle to make u turn from NCT.
ma-rt-in (2023-09-19 17:31:27+00:00): Hallo,
wenn das Gasthaus geschlossen ist, dann bitte den lifecycle prefix verwenden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

ich passe das für dich nun schnell an.

vg
Frans S (2023-10-03 09:16:04+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
Please solve the issues reported by the issue triangle before uploading your work!
When you see a road, connecting settlements, tagged as a track, please adjust it. Tracks cannot connect settlements. Just for local access to farmland. Woods or river.
Use unclassified, residential or another appropriate tag.
Best regards
eggie (2023-09-15 19:56:54+00:00): Dag Noah  Je vraagt feedback..   Je hoeft geen area =yes toe te voegen aan de vlakken.
Wanneer wegen en/of paden niet aan elkaar zitten routeert het niet
Welicht even naar die aansluitingen van die voetpaden kijken.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141312375
foutmelding
warnings:disconnected_way:highway 	2

MVG
eggiue
Patr1k_P (2023-11-09 15:00:11+00:00): obcerstvenie bolo uz tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6499652576/history takze ste nemali vytvarat dalsiu duplikaciu do budovy, ale doplnit tagy do poi bodu
Ján Neščivera (2023-11-09 20:52:55+00:00): pardon, to bola nehoda, asi som blbo klikol na ten bod
eggie (2023-09-15 18:02:04+00:00): Dag Noah..
Tip.
area yes hoeft niet op een weiland. 
De juiste tag voor weiland is 
landuse=meaowd.
Voor akkerland gebruiken we landuse=farmland.
Pas je het aan.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-15 19:01:17+00:00): Typo landuse=meadow
eggie (2023-09-15 19:58:05+00:00): area yes verwijderd
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-09-23 09:04:13+00:00): I've removed strange bicycle tags you've added and noticed that you've added them recently. What's the reason for adding bicycle=no here?
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-09-23 09:09:04+00:00): And the same question about Pallasti street. Are there signs which forbid cycling?
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-09-23 09:13:58+00:00): And Narva mnt near Reidi tee
mikaeldui (2023-09-23 09:45:55+00:00): There's a designated bicycle way on the west side, and the eastern foot path is also wide enough to accommodate bicycles, so there's no reason to route cyclists on the car road.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-09-23 10:20:28+00:00): That's up to the cyclists and routers to decide.
mikaeldui (2023-09-23 10:35:29+00:00): Says here plan your route, i.e. don't go on the road for cars when there is a cycleway next to it: https://www.transpordiamet.ee/en/node/180

I'd say that makes it illegal to cycle on the road for cars.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-09-23 10:39:24+00:00): access tags are about legal access, not personal opinions. To a degree I'm ok when people bend them in form of bicycle=yes on footways where city just didn't think of the cyclists and no penalty for them would be enforced, but restricting something without there being an actual restriction is something which we shouldn't do. 

Cycling on what the law calls "carriageway" is allowed. 

Cycling on footways (you've mentioned eastern side) is forbidden for adults and since there is a "safe" alternative on western side shouldn't be mapped. As I've mentioned, I'm ok if people bend this rule where there are no safe alternatives for a casual cyclist and the road is not too crowded.

There are many reasons why cyclists may prefer main thoroughfare to combined cycling/pedestrian path
1) They move at high speed and don't want to hit a pedestrian at 40km/h
2) There are many people which walk randomly as opposed to cars. It's especially dangerous near children even at low speed. People want to walk and enjoy their day, not constantly be aware and afraid of a cyclists.
3) Drivers coming from connected service ways onto the crossing without expecting anyone to approach fast, while they would yield for a cyclist on a main thoroughfare.
4) Cyclists are also required to cross crossings at the speed of pedestrian by law, while there is no such need on a main thoroughfare. 

There may be other reasons and it's ok, since the law allows it.

Smarter routers https://brouter.m11n.de have profiles which allow to select which style of cycling you prefer more, we should leave this decision them and the user.

You can find Road Traffic Act in English here
https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/503072023004/consolide
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-09-23 10:42:54+00:00): What you've linked is not a law, please refer to § 32 of Road Traffic Act

 (1) A cycle and light moped may be ridden:
 1) on a cycle lane;
 2) on a cycle track;
 3) on a cycle and pedestrian track;
 4) close to the right edge of the carriageway, except during a left turn or U-turn specified in subsection 1 of § 48 of this Act;
 5) on the shoulder.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-09-23 10:43:51+00:00): And there is no such thing in the law as "road for cars". The road is for everyone.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-09-23 10:48:34+00:00): Some other reasons:
5) curbs, even small ones might be unpleasant on a road bike
6) "cycleway" sometimes has more incline than a throughfare
7) "cycleways" may be more dangerous than a throughfare (Tabasalu descent)
8) "cycleways" may have strange zigzags which make you break (Right after Tabasalu descent, in the city direction)
Andrea Musuruane (2023-09-26 17:22:48+00:00): Ciao. Anche questa modifica è errata. Hai rimosso il tag highway=path. Ora non si sa cosa sia questa way. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141312602
Andrea Musuruane (2023-09-26 17:18:26+00:00): Ciao. Questa modifica è errata. Hai tolto il tag highway=path. Ora non si sa cos sia questa way. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141312677
rene78 (2023-09-16 09:56:34+00:00): Ich hätte eher vermutet, dass das ein reiner Herrenfriseur ist..
rene78 (2023-09-16 12:46:44+00:00): Gerade mal die Homepage angeschaut. Damenhaarschnitt gibt's auch. Passt also!
AnGry63 (2023-09-17 10:46:12+00:00): Der Namen des Salons stammt in der Tat noch aus der Zeit als es ein reiner Herrensalon war. Nach dem Pandemie hat sich das aber ein Stück weit auch für Frauen geöffnet. Kein Färben, ... aber Haarschnitt ja! Hatte das geändert als ich selbst als Kunde vor Ort war. Kenne somit auch den Inhaber (seit Jahren).
rene78 (2023-09-20 05:42:58+00:00): 👍
mzioma (2023-09-16 17:26:22+00:00): Budynki stacji, która dodałaś/dodałeś już nieistnienieją. Dlatego najlepiej edycje wykonywać nie bazując tylko na zdjęciach satelitarnych, a najlepiej po wykonaniu wizji lokalnej. Pozdrawiam.
NieWnen (2023-09-16 17:53:39+00:00): Zmieniłem to tylko przy okazji, bo zostawianie takich niepołączonych fragmentów dróg nie pomaga. Nigdy nie wiadomo dlaczego ktoś tak to zrobił. Jeśli nie ma już stacji, można wycofać i przywrócić trawnik.

Warto przynajmniej dodawać `noexit=yes` jeśli nie są ze sobą takie drogi połączone, `oneway` pewnie też o ile nie możliwym jest np. zjazd z "dawnego wyjazdu".

Natomiast co do poprzedniej zmiany, to warto wrzucać w źródło "survey" lub/i inne na których się opierało, bo tak to inni mapujący nie wiedzą skąd, ktoś czerpie dane, tym bardziej, że zmiana wskazuje właśnie na użycie tylko i wyłącznie na zdjęć lotniczych. Pozdrawiam.
infeeeee (2023-09-15 18:34:53+00:00): Hello!

Please, if you edit internationally can you add an English language summary as well? You are editing places where no Cyrillic script used, it would help reviewers a lot. 

Also it's a good practice to create one changeset per one country: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets Just click save if you finished a country, not just at the end.

Unfortunately we had a lot of bot vandals recently, and they created changesets similar to this one: big bounding boxes spanning multiple countries, they changed names of places. and the description was sometimes written with Cyrillic script.

Thank you for your understanding, and thanks for this contribution!
Зміцер1 (2023-09-15 18:37:10+00:00): This is adding belarusian names of cities/towns
infeeeee (2023-09-15 18:41:01+00:00): Yes, I figured it out, thank you again, please be more careful next time!
JoltCode (2023-09-15 17:23:50+00:00): West* 😅😭
Glassman (2023-09-15 20:32:44+00:00): I'm not sure what you mean when sections of the footway are tagged as layer=-1. A negative layer usually is something underground or below a bridge. Let me know if you need help sorting this out.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141313104
Sawyer311 (2023-09-15 21:01:53+00:00): It said that it was in a building, so I clicked the button that said lower. I will try and fix it though. Thank you for letting me know!
nlehuby (2023-09-15 18:11:58+00:00): Hey,

t'es sur(e)  de toi concernant la position de la Mairie de Rouxmesnil-Bouteilles ?
D'après Bing Street Side, à cette position, il y a un bar tabac. https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=20/49.906712393305284/1.0907752811908724&photo_overlay=streetside
motocultrice (2023-09-15 20:14:37+00:00): pas mal le steetside, je connaissais pas. 
je me suis basé sur ce que dit le site ouaib de la mairie, avec leur carte et le nom de la rue. mais en effet c'est chelou que la mairie soit pas aussi démarquée, et que y'ait pas marqué mairie du tout.
Barroszt (2023-10-03 19:50:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1208110122
Barroszt (2023-10-03 19:51:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1208109843 dwie te same drogi?
RCRalph (2023-10-04 10:56:06+00:00): Zobaczę co się podziało do końca dnia
RCRalph (2023-10-04 14:25:28+00:00): Naprawione https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142148009
Nádia Cristina Da Silva Mello (2023-09-16 15:19:03+00:00): MAPEAMENTO_OBRAC_2023_VIAS_CONTÃO
Frans S (2023-09-24 14:03:45+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
This is an emergency project to map buildings and roads.
Farmland areas and tracks in between them are not important.
Please focus on buildings and roads.
jmarchon (2023-09-17 16:41:33+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!
It looks like you've added duplicate buildings here. I've fixed it.
Happy mapping,
jmarchon
Nádia Cristina Da Silva Mello (2023-09-17 01:07:28+00:00): Mapeamento_OBRAC_2023_Vias_Contão
Nádia Cristina Da Silva Mello (2023-09-17 01:08:07+00:00): Mapeamento_OBRAC_2023_Vias_Contão
Frans S (2023-09-17 10:15:41+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping.
On this task, the multi story / high-rise buildings are incorrect mapped.
You can see both one or more side walls and the roof. The Imagery is taken under a certain angle, so you can see more than just the roof.
Often all visible walls and roofs are mapped as 1 building.
The correct way is to map the roofline and move the whole object on their footprint.
See this video.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141314964
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-19 05:14:28+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3896174 ?

Tu chyba nie jest woda na stałe?
Nádia Cristina Da Silva Mello (2023-09-17 01:08:26+00:00): Mapeamento_OBRAC_2023_Vias_Contão
Henry572 (2023-09-15 18:27:38+00:00): Revert von https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141308979.
Frans S (2023-10-02 09:34:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please focus on buildings and highways. You introduced errors while adding landscape objects.
This is an emergency project !
Best regards
user_5359 (2023-09-16 07:52:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/354177746.
We use the 24 hours notation for service_times. Without any weekday shortcut the services is every day (not only Sunday).
Allroads (2023-09-20 14:05:03+00:00): Ik zal mijn preset aanpassen voor unmarked om overal ook corssing:markings=no te zetten.

kwam dat als maproulette naar voren?
wvdp (2023-09-20 17:09:02+00:00): de challange gaat over wikidata tags op winkels. maar ID geef dit ook al validatie probleem