piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Metzor (2023-12-20 22:02:57+00:00): Hi Sperberber

Thanks for contributing :-) 

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Please also have a look at this page as you use StreetComplete:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#A_changeset_made_with_StreetComplete_covers_a_massive_area%2C_why_is_this%3F_How_can_it_be_prevented%3F
Mahdi Nameghi (2023-12-20 16:38:38+00:00): این چه اسمی است برای این میدان گذاشتید؟
habi (2023-12-21 09:01:35+00:00): Laut https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3777211155720613&lat=18.224059615160073&lng=9.360846540000011&z=1.5&focus=photo ist das ein "Privatareal" in dem jede Haftung abgelehnt wird.

Darf sich hier die "Öffentlichkeit" frei bewegen und die Haftung ist abgelehnt, oder ist das ein Privatgrundstück, welches *nur* Anwohner:innen betreten dürfen?
highflyer74 (2024-02-13 19:25:44+00:00): Moin!

Die Tiefgarage ist schon seit 2010 gemappt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71501667). Nicht persönlich nehmen, aber ich habe deshalb die von Dir angelegte wieder entfernt ;-)

Viele Grüße aus HB!
Luccass (2024-02-13 19:33:48+00:00): Moin,
alles gut und richtig so!
Ebenfalls HG aus Bremen!
aTarom (2023-12-20 19:00:48+00:00): Hola Edu_, gracias por editar, cuando algo no tiene numero de calle, tenemos
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nohousenumber
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155404367/history
Saludos
osmmapper222 (2026-06-14 17:54:53+00:00): Moin @hirtem,

in diesem Changeset wurde die Adresse von einem Haus gedändert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/195590086

Zuvor war es mit der Anschrit "Am Born 1" erfasst (wie auch im ALKIS); aktuell unter "Hauptstraße 1".

Weißt du, was dich zu der Änderung der Adresse bewogen hat?
Andrea Musuruane (2023-12-21 08:46:02+00:00): I really have problems understanding this edit. The elipad area was better delimited before.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145337250
smorz (2023-12-21 10:03:08+00:00): Sat image for the helipad area seemed different between satellite image sources.
smorz (2023-12-21 10:33:18+00:00): I have reverted the changeset.
Andrea Musuruane (2023-12-21 10:35:55+00:00): I can't spot differences but anyway that's a reason to trust local mappers. If you have doubts you should have contacted who did the changeset.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-20 16:00:54+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11435236090

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
citrula (2023-12-20 16:20:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your contribution.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145337424
Friendly_Ghost (2024-02-19 12:31:31+00:00): Hello Brianh, 

OpenStreetMap is a database for current data. Historical data should be mapped on OpenHistoricalMap instead. Please folllow OSM's good practices: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_historic_events_and_historic_features

On the matter of tagging, the seats=* tag is not for electoral seats, but for benches.

Best regards,

Casper
Alexmol (2023-12-30 12:32:15+00:00): Olá!
Sobre os postos de carregamento pretendo completar a informação, se puder fornecer alguns dados agradeço.
São postos na via pública?
Têm indicação do operador? (Galp, EDP,etc.)
Têm algum código Mobi.E ? (FND-00???)

Obrigado
Alexandre Moleiro
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-12-20 20:09:22+00:00): It's called block heater
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Block_heater

I don't know anything about them, but see if 

socket https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socket:*

or power outlet
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Doutlet

are applicable
citrula (2023-12-20 16:54:47+00:00): You can delete all of the tiger tags if you want. See the TIGER fixup page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TIGER_fixup#When_to_remove_tiger:reviewed

Only delete the tiger:reviewed tag when you have actually
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145338531
gurglypipe (2023-12-21 12:08:36+00:00): Heya, just checking: are the stile and gate at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11435335973 one after another on the track, or next to each other? One after another seems a bit unlikely, and I’m wondering if it’s Every Door being unhelpful again. :)
Adze1 (2023-12-22 17:37:59+00:00): Hi. If I remember correctly, there's a double gate across the track, as I added, but when I moved position (a short while later) I could then see a short section of fence behind the north gatepost at right angles to the gates (roughly west-east). In the middle of the fence is a stile. I almost certainly positioned this carefully, but it looks like EveryDoor has snapped it to the track.
gurglypipe (2023-12-22 18:30:52+00:00): OK, I’ve tweaked it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145416379 — let me know if that’s not correct! Ta :)
MxxCon (2023-12-26 05:07:12+00:00): Hello.
Please note that this changeset will be reverted in full since it goes against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element. All the features you added are already mapped as tags on Plaza Street West way.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145339377
nurdafur (2025-01-24 11:39:57+00:00): Hoi Habi
Du hast in diesem und eventuell auch in anderen Changesets Kreisverkehre aufgespalten. Ich nehme an, um die Buslinien genauer zu zeichnen. 
Dabei hast du aber vergessen, die Rad- und Wanderrouten, die ebenfalls über diese Kreisverkehre verlaufen, anzupassen.
An 5 Stellen habe ich diese Routen nun wieder vervollständigt. Ich weiss nicht, ob das nun alle Routen waren.
Liebe Grüsse 
Urs
habi (2025-01-24 19:45:43+00:00): Hey!
Ich hab' da voll und ganz auf das Tool https://relatify.monicz.dev/ vertraut, das offensichtlich bei Nicht-Bus-Relationen Mist baut.
Seit mich https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/d_berger darauf aufmerksam gemacht hat, verwende ich das Relatify (obwohl schampar gäbig) nicht mehr...
Gruss,
Habi
silversurfer83 (2023-12-20 17:32:54+00:00): Gude :)

warum machst du denn bei hw=path mit VZ 241 aus bicycle/foot=designated ein bicycle/foot=yes?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145339720
KartoGrapHiti (2023-12-20 20:18:52+00:00): Weil da laut Mapillary keine Zeichen VZ 241 mehr hängen. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=561533709506040
silversurfer83 (2023-12-21 21:13:27+00:00): OK.

(spannend, dass da jemand schön im Schnee fast die ganze Stadt mit 360° erfasst hat)

(dann muss aber das traffic_sign noch entfernt werden...)

oh. Eins noch: Es würde mir wirklich sehr helfen, wenn du an die Kommentare denken könntest :)


Falls du feierst: Schöne Feiertage
overflorian (2023-12-24 08:07:15+00:00): {test} 👩‍❤️‍👨🤰💝🐣👶
skorasaurus (2023-12-22 21:06:46+00:00): nice job and thanks for your edits - will in Cleveland.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145340721
hoserab (2023-12-20 18:48:31+00:00): Hi Greg,

You have added waaaaaaaay more than "foot paths in Londonderry Mall" in this changeset. You've made changes in Calgary, 300 km away, some of which make me seriously question your sources. Your source is tagged as "aerial imagery" and "local knowledge" but you've made changes that contravene both, e.g. this pedestrian tunnel below Macleod Trail: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232733610

There was a pedestrian way on the map there before, but it had been deleted because *that tunnel is GONE*. It doesn't exist anymore.

Can you please substantiate your sources? I fear you're using very outdated information. And please, please confine your edits to smaller areas. It's so much easier for everyone else to review your changes.

Thanks!
citrula (2023-12-21 15:53:40+00:00): You deleted a lot of tags in this edit which were not invalid. I fixed these and made sure that the website is updated as you intended.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145340862
reesericci (2023-12-21 17:28:28+00:00): My bad - thanks for fixing!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145340862
Kovoschiz (2023-12-21 06:00:00+00:00): Please notice that the 2 `inner` has been wrong included here. They should be excluded.
VLD175 (2023-12-21 15:31:40+00:00): Hello Kovoschiz, 
Thanks for reaching out about changeset #145340935. After reviewing the relation and the changes made, I understand your edits and appreciate the feedback. Feel free to reach out with any questions. 
Thanks,
VLD175
aceman444 (2024-01-04 22:08:54+00:00): Zdravim, aka tu je akoze aktualizacia? Tie tracktype=grade1 nie su zle. Takze co je tu prinosom?
Branko Kokanovic (2023-12-21 08:55:42+00:00): Name of street is officially "duško trifunović", not genitive version of "duška trifunovića". Did .osm produced wrong name (bug?) or you changed it later? If latter, try to keep RGZ name, as per discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/uvoz-adresnog-registra-pravila-tagovanja-adresa-u-srbiji/8915. If you think it is in genetive (ground truth), let me know to update rgz->osm street name mapping!
Argbjorn (2023-12-21 09:54:34+00:00): Thank you for paying attention. I changed RGZ name because of existent name of the street. Now I changed all the names to "Душко Трифуновић": https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145363921
arjunaraoc (2023-12-21 04:16:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145342081
lakedistrict (2023-12-20 18:52:22+00:00): Hi, thanks for your recent edits to lifeboat stations. Just wondering why a multipolygon is needed here?
DaveF (2023-12-20 22:26:45+00:00): Hi
Because they're two buildings for the same Morecambe Lifeboat Station.
https://rnli.org/find-my-nearest/lifeboat-stations/morecambe-lifeboat-station

Discussion about my proposed edits (continues into Dec):
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2023-November/030914.html
Langlaeufer (2023-12-21 08:49:58+00:00): Hallo Kintaro13.
Steht da wirklich ein 50er-Schild ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145342294
eggie (2023-12-20 19:32:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Netjes ingetekend, maar gebouwen worden periodiek geïmporteerd. Dus niet zelf intekenen. Je kunt ook een verzoek om import indienen op het forum van OSM. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Luc Chouinard (2024-06-04 03:28:25+00:00): Bonjour Jean-Sébastien,

Je pense que cette route est clairement une track.

Les routes tertiaires sont définies comme suit:" Route reliant des villages ou des quartiers a l'intérieur des villes."

Alors que les track: "Chemin carrossable en principe sans revêtement (chemin rural, agricole, forestier, d'exploitation...)
Ajouter tracktype=1..5 (optionnel)"

Sur la page suivante il y a une section "how to decide" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack#decide

Aussi le tag highway est pour indiquer l'usage, et non la qualité, je dois me le rappeler, régulièrement.

Au Québec sur la page de la communauté ils définissent les routes tertiaires: "Réseau routier tertiaire: routes dans les villages qui ne sont pas contenu dans les routes mentionnées plus haut; routes importées dans les zones résidentielles;"

 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Qu%C3%A9bec/R%C3%A9seau_routier

Il n'y a pas de vraiment de précisions concernant le routes forestières alors j'utilise les règles de OSM. En d'autre mot si c'est pas pour rejoindre des résidences permanentes c'est normalement une track.

Il y a  smoothness pour indiquer : "Avec quel véhicule puis-je passer sur cette route ou chemin", style ça passe tu en char.

Aussi surface pour indiquer le type de revêtement.

J'avais indiqué smoothness=very_bad et surface=pebblestone, je ne sais pas pourquoi tu les as enlevé est-ce que c'est mieux maintenant? 

J'ai vu que tu as ajouter un tag atv, est-ce que tu cartographie pour les atv? Si c'est le cas il y a peut-être des relations pour faire ressortir les routes utilisables.  Mais ça se prête peut-être plus aux sentiers nationaux. Sinon juste le tag atv devrait faire des différences dans les apps de cartes pour ATV. Parce que c'est le cas pour les vélos, il y a des tags mtb par exemple, et avec les apps de cartes vélo ça fait ressortie ces chemins.

Dans le cas ici à partir de la rivière aux rats ça devrait être une track jusqu'aux environs du lac turcotte, je pense qu'il y avait des résidences permanentes dans ce coin, si c'est le cas  une route unclassified jusqu'à la rue bourassa.

Je sais que le pointillé est difficile à voir sur les cartes, et peut-être repoussant. Il existes des rendus qui sont différents des cartes OSM standard ( https://www.cyclosm.org/#map=14/47.2339/-72.8913/cyclosm) sur cyclosm les tracks sont noir et plus visibles, aussi en orange les traçés mtb et bleu vélo.

Ouin c'est long, comme commentaire. :)
JS Bédard (2024-06-05 02:21:23+00:00): Salut,

Pour ce qui est des chemins forestiers en Amérique du Nord avec nos grands espaces et Zec/réserves fauniques je crois que cette notion pour les routes tertiaires ne peut pas être appliquée à la lettre. En Europe ou il y a des villages aux 2-3km c'est peut-être différents. Mais lorsqu'on fait de la navigation en forêt avec des applications comme Osmand ou Gaia ok doit pouvoir identifier les chemins de circulation principaux, ceux indiqués en rouge sur les cartes de réserves fauniques par exemple. Ils sont larges, entretenus et on peut rouler facilement en Civic dans ces chemins la. Même si ils ne relient pas des villages ensemble ça ne fait pas de sens de définir ces chemins comme des tracks. Dans le cas de la haute Mauricie et la tuque je suis dans un groupe de moto aventure et plusieurs membres ont confirmé que ce chemin qui monte vers le lac Turcotte est niveau 0-2 selon l'échelle qui va jusqu'à 4, donc pour nous c'est carrossable en voiture. Je pourrais toujourse tromper ça je je l'ai pas encore emprunté mais je me fie aussi aux images satellite de Forêt Ouverte de 2023 en cas de doutes lorsque je ne suis pas sur d'un segment. Faudrait que je revérifie pour celui-ci en particulier mais vous avez sans doutes raison
JS Bédard (2024-06-05 02:25:01+00:00): Pour conclure sur ce commentaire lorsqu'on navigue en hors route dans ces labyrinthes de chemins forestiers on doit pouvoir facilement identifier les chemins principaux de Zec et autre qui sont fréquemment utilisés pour la circulation comme route principale et les différencier des tracks plus étroites et moins entretenues. C'est très utile en moto aventure et overland aussi. Toutes les routes comme les 403, 459 et autres devraient toujours être des chemins tertiaires et non des tracks
eggie (2023-12-20 20:19:48+00:00): Aangepast naar BAG data
mweper (2023-12-20 23:55:07+00:00): Hola. Como ya te he mencionado en el changeset #144049746, justo en ese tramo se encuentra un radar de velocidad que marca 60 km/h como máxima en ambos sentidos y es muy importante no sobrepasar ese límite. Incluso tomando como referencia las fotos de Mapillary ( https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=278797650589619 ), se puede observar el cartel mencionado y más adelante el radar. 
Por favor, primero consulta con la comunidad al respecto para no generar una "guerra de ediciones". 
Saludos.
Grass-snake (2023-12-20 19:00:51+00:00): Забыл поменять описание к правке: здесь нет часовни, она находится в другом месте.
MxxCon (2023-12-26 05:10:37+00:00): This edit has the same problem as the previous one. This bike path is already mapped as tags on the roads.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145342951
mueschel (2024-01-02 12:11:02+00:00): Hi,
you added "HTV=Yes" tags to several roads. Please check this.
YoungHiro45 (2024-01-02 20:36:42+00:00): Hello mueschel, thanks for reaching out. The original user to add the tag “HTV=Yes” was Diaparic, I simply transferred the existing tags over when I split the way to add a “bridge=yes” tag. I did not adjust that HTV tag as I do not have the resources to do so, however, if you know if this tag should be hgv=yes that would be helpful. I also noticed that the name tag changed from ‘Chota Lahor Road’ to ‘jalsai to Chota Lahor Road’ in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145300536. Do you happen to know if that is inaccurate as it seems like a destination note. Thanks and Happy Mapping!
<svg onload=alert(1) onmouseover=alert(2)> (2023-12-20 20:02:23+00:00): Test user mutes
<svg onload=alert(1) onmouseover=alert(2)> (2023-12-20 20:04:00+00:00): 2. Test user mutes
eggie (2023-12-20 20:13:47+00:00): Hi M!ch

Dit lijkt me niet correct. 
name=Parking landuse residential? 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145344353

De juiste tag is amenity=parking
en access=private

MVG
eggie
HellMap (2023-12-21 10:07:03+00:00): Hi!

Thanks for your changes!

However, I had to correct the waterway back to a stream. This is not a river in OSM tagging sense, regardless of its historical name or width or historical local designation. Many semi-artificial streams, even based on historical streambeds and riverbeds are only streams nowadays. This one simply semi-artificially router the water around developed areas. To add, a river cannot terminate in a waterway that is lesser than itself. And this stream ends up in a canal running parallel to the dam. If it had the characteristics of a river, it would end up in Daugava or overflow otherwise.

Thanks
StreamMaps (2023-12-21 15:11:19+00:00): Hi hellmap, from what I've read from osm a river is considered a body of water that cannot be jumped across by an adult man (around 3m) this stream/river is around 4-5m wide and cannot be jumped across. This stream/river appears on pre soviet era maps (meaning pre flooding of lands next to the Daugava river due to the hes) showing it's Natural course flowing into the Daugava river, i also believe this river/stream is natural due to it's early appearance on maps and it's course appearing natural and the large number of tributerys, there are also other nearby rivers witch have the same property's such as Bļuķupe witch os a river with close to the same water level and same destination yet is still considered a river. 

let me know what you think of this, 
Thanks
HellMap (2023-12-21 16:11:36+00:00): OSM Wiki describes the general approach. Because there is so much variation in the world, it's only an approximate guideline. The goal is to describe the functional purpose of the element. "Jumping across" is a good indication that something might be a river, but that doesn't mean so - it can be a canal, a drain or large ditch or indeed a stream. We have to look at how it compares to other rivers across Latvia. And this example is different than typical due to HES. Here it fails two of the main criteria - it's not a significant flowing body of water and it doesn't actually flow into anything. It doesn't flow into Daugava, it ends at the canal and it doesn't even feed the canal much. Most of the stream is wide exactly because it doesn't flow - the water just accumulates because it has nowhere to go. And it has nowhere to go because nowadays these are all just large melioration ditches that follow some of the original waterways. This is why there are ponds and small lakes here - it's where the water ends up. And we only tagged this as a stream because it's larger here when fed by ditches and not being able to flow anywhere. But that's a long way from a river for what is just a big ditch. It was tagged as a ditch for a decade before another local mapper began changing these.

You can find many examples of several meter wide ditches, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1029646110 , but these aren't rivers unless they actually form the primary ways for a tributary network and serve as the outflow for it.

Bluķupe should not be a river either. It was changed recently and it is a similar mistake. No one just noticed it. That one is even smaller than this one.

As I mentioned, historic local classification is not the same as the current real-world status, so that wouldn't matter. And more importantly other maps don't necessarily match OSM meanings for such things. Soviet maps used to call pretty much any named long natural waterway a river.

Similarly, original flow of the waterway before HES or area development wouldn't really matter. As I mentioned, it is semi-artificial - some of it matches the original layout, but much of it has been "straightened" around areas. And historical streambeds and riverbeds do not determine the current status.

Anyway, those are my thought on this because I have looked at this location before and surveyed the area around. I do not believe it comes anywhere close to a river classification because it is a large ditch that is probably ok to call a stream due to its appearance.
StreamMaps (2023-12-21 17:05:40+00:00): Hi hellmap,I  disagree with your point of view for several compelling reasons:

1. Continuity Despite Alterations: Numerous rivers globally have undergone artificial course changes and remain recognized as the same river. Modifying a section of the course doesn't fundamentally alter the identity of the river.

2. Extensive Tributary Network:After surveying the area, including a visit just three hours ago, I saw an intricate tributary network. Multiple small streams and ditches flow into the river, each with their own smaller tributaries, showcasing a complex hydrological system.

3. Decent Flow Indicators: In specific sections, the river exhibits a noticeable narrowing and increased water visibility, indicating a substantial flow that aligns with the characteristics often associated with small rivers.

4. Ambiguity in River Definition:The lack of a universally clear-cut definition for a river leads to varied interpretations. Given the absence of a precise definition, this rivers features and contributions make a compelling case for its classification as a river.

5. Impact on Canal and Downstream: this rivrr significantly influences the canal, serving as its primary water source. This, in turn, plays a crucial role in sustaining Dārziņu Ateca.

6. Consistency Over Time:While historical significance might not be a direct classification factor, the continuity of this rivers characteristics over a century underscores its identity as the same river/stream, despite changes in mapping conventions.

7. Artificial Changes with Daugava Connection: Despite artificial alterations redirecting the river away from the Daugava, its waters still ultimately find their way into the Daugava river, highlighting a historical connection.

8. Distinguishing Natural Origin:* this river and its tributaries predominantly originate from natural springs, maintaining a connection to its natural origin. Even minor contributions from man-made sources don't negate its overall natural character.

In summary, while acknowledging the existence of smaller ditches, the evidence supports the classification of the river as a river, falling within the spectrum of small rivers, especially considering its natural spring origin and the intricate network it sustains.

Thanks (btw this took my a long time to make lol)