piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2025-04-18 14:59:36+00:00): Beste C Batenburg Je hebt hier een weg op een weg geplakt. Dat werkt niet.
Ik he het onderliggende voetpad verwijderd en emergency=designated toegevoegd. 
Pas je het na zelf na verloop van tijd weer aan? 
MVG
eggie
C Batenburg (2025-04-18 15:07:40+00:00): Aha, nee dat was ook inderdaad de vraag of dat zou werken, ergens is het wel de waarheid :-).
Maar bedankt voor het checken, weten we dat ook weer.
Uiteraard na de werkzaamheden zet ik alles weer terug.
Thanx
eggie (2025-04-18 15:13:24+00:00): Top!
szother (2025-04-18 14:08:15+00:00): See also the following discussion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165074059
bxl-forever (2025-04-18 14:28:45+00:00): There is already an established practice for tram switches on STIB/MIVBs tram network.
The ref code is two parts, as such: X.XXX
Perhaps you might want to concentrate on railway switches and not bother with the tram network.
I will fix your edits.
pfhllnts (2025-04-18 14:51:49+00:00): You could of course just have given me a friendly notice of your convention and I would have fixed it myself later but sure, your tone speaks for itself.
bxl-forever (2025-04-18 16:53:32+00:00): No, it was just to inform you that we already use a standard, nothing personal.
Fortunately, contrary to railway switches, the reference nbr of tram switches is quite easy to find when you are walking on the street. ;-)
ChrissW-R1 (2025-05-18 18:52:05+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/4765750
RedGreenBlue09 (2025-04-18 16:27:37+00:00): Chào bạn, chỉ sử dụng ref cho Đường huyện, Đường tỉnh và Quốc lộ
Trần Sung (2025-04-19 06:32:30+00:00): Cảm ơn bạn đã hỗ trợ tôi về ref !
Jakub Sýček (2025-04-27 08:28:24+00:00): Uživatel Finreeal potvrdil, že je tato editace správná. Tomu odpovídá i fakt, že na obě křižovatky prošly minulý rok rekonstrukcí a dostaly nové semafory. Ke kontrole došlo, protože tag traffic_signals:vibration=yes je v ČR neobvyklý a často se jedná o chybu uživatelů aplikace StreetComplete.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2025-04-30 01:29:31+00:00): Please attach speed cameras to the road.

Or create a maxspeed enforcement relation.

See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dspeed_camera
BrackoNe (2025-04-30 04:49:16+00:00): And where it was, if not on the road?
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2025-04-30 11:17:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12766235625

Is attached to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36851805

Which is a forest.

It should be on the road, not the forest.
BrackoNe (2025-04-30 11:23:44+00:00): If that happen it was honest mistake not something that is repeated over and over. Also forest sharing same path (not way but path) so mistake could happen. If you see such single issue, go and fix it.

At this way it is very discouraging sending messages for single issue after adding tons of same features.


Thanks,
Nemanja
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2025-04-30 11:52:37+00:00): Sorry,
I did not mean to discourage you.
Mathias_ADAV (2025-05-16 09:05:58+00:00): Bonjour, des pistes cyclables ont bien été créé sur ce projet, voici quelques photos du projet https://info.lenord.fr/rd-70--un-nouveau-boulevard-urbain-entre-raismes-et-petite-foret  et la description du CD59
Je remets donc les tags appropriés.

"Sur la RD70, des pistes cyclables unidirectionnelles ont été créées de part et d’autre de la chaussée.
Ci-joint, tu peux retrouver l’emplacement de ces nouveaux aménagements (représentés en trait pointillé rouge).
De plus, le Département a aménagé des pistes bidirectionnelles autour des giratoires RD70/Rue Jacquard et RD70/Rue d’en Haut et des amorces de pistes unidirectionnelles autour des rues de ces 2 giratoires. Une amorce d’une piste bidirectionnelle sur la rue Michel Chasles menant à la ZAC Petite Forêt a également été aménagé."
anne_geovelo (2025-05-16 09:40:33+00:00): Bonjour Mathias, 

A super, merci pour ce complément d'informations et les modifications!

Anne
bxl-forever (2025-04-18 16:16:59+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for the survey.

However, I rememember surveying this night shop myself some time ago, and "night shop" was just a display and not the name.

As you could see, this was correctly tagged like this: description=Night Shop + noname=yes

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4026937917/history

I see that now we have something strange:
description=Night Shop
name=Night shop

So, this is now their official name, right?
hurledportable922 (2025-04-19 05:31:29+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for the review. It did give me a pause when surveying. I don’t think anything has changed but my take would be that the big store sign on the facade looks enough like a store name even though it is indeed generic. The typography and the subtitle "alimentation générale" also pointing to it. 
If the name was not generic there wouldn’t be any doubt that this is the name of the store. 

I can definitely see how that could be controversial so happy to go either way.
Let me know what you think and I can revert or remove the description as needed.


Mapillary link for convenience https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.8332424&lng=4.3663856&z=17&pKey=6315104901908745&focus=photo&x=0.6628338128448632&y=0.4369280439050215&zoom=0


Let me know what you think
user_21736114 (2025-09-04 04:11:57+00:00): вулиця Мальовнича неправильно 
правильно Мальовнича вулиця 
якшо назва є прикметником тобто відпоаідає на питання який/яка типу Зелена Українська Яблунева  то ми слово вулиця пишемо праворуч

Якшо назва вулиці є іменником тобто відповідає на питатння кого або що - це назві типу Єдності Свободи Богдана Хмельницького Шевченка 
то слово вулиця пишеться зліва

це все згідно рішення української спільноти
worldqafix (2025-09-04 12:57:48+00:00): Дякую за коментар. Я використовував відповідне розпорядження яке є в назві і не змінював порядок слів.
SomeoneElse (2026-03-31 00:55:17+00:00): For https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10411148 I'm guessing "Yetholm" rather than "Yeltholm" maybe?
(I know that you didn't originate the name...)
gurglypipe (2026-03-31 08:52:00+00:00): Indeed, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180662032 :)
demon_box (2025-04-18 16:14:24+00:00): Ciao Pete27, scusami, 1 domanda: perchè mappi le attività commerciali (ad es. del C.C. Flaminia) non all'interno del poligono dell'edificio ma esterne?? Queste attività cha hai mappato "Ristorante Cinese La Giada, MaxFactroy e Ovvio" sono collocate all'aperto nel parcheggio o sono all'interno dell'edificio C.C. Flaminia? Cerchiamo x favore di mappare con +accuratezza, GRAZIE.
Modifiche già apportate. BuonMapping!
Mathias_ADAV (2025-05-16 08:50:53+00:00): Bonjour,

ce sont de vieux aménagements qui existent toujours, il y-a bien des indications pour les cyclistes, j'ai fais la modification voici les images à dispositions : https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=50.363392%7E3.608943&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027&pi=-8.8&style=x&dir=90.3

https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=50.368326%7E3.610618&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027&pi=-3.4&style=x&dir=34.5

https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=50.363392%7E3.608943&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027&pi=-8.8&style=x&dir=90.3

https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=50.363891%7E3.609086&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027&pi=-5.3&style=x&dir=68.5

https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=50.365817%7E3.609625&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027&pi=-2.6&style=x&dir=106.7

https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=50.368264%7E3.61079&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027&pi=-6.4&style=x&dir=345.8

https://www.bing.com/maps?&cp=50.368264~3.61079&lvl=17&dir=345.80246&pi=-6.386528&style=x&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027
anne_geovelo (2025-05-16 09:39:44+00:00): Bonjour Mathias, 

Merci pour ce complément d'informations et les modifications.

Anne
Dodko (2025-04-22 12:42:40+00:00): Adresa už existuje v budove, netreba ju duplicitne pridávať aj do POI obchodov.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 17:24:21+00:00): Hello!

You used
access=now
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1308914363/history

Have you maybe meant
access=no
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
eggie (2025-04-19 06:45:50+00:00): Dag spughetti  .. 
Formeel klopt het, maarrrrr... 
Wees voorzichtig met al die wegen over die erven.
Het wordt niet altijd op prijs gesteld. 
Voeg in ieder geval access=private toe en/of op een toegansweg access=permissive zoals bv naar die caravanstalling.

MVG
eggie
spughetti (2025-04-19 11:14:51+00:00): Hey Eggie,
Bedankt voor de feedback

Mvg,
spuh
silversurfer83 (2025-04-18 19:41:03+00:00): Hi :)

es gibt einen Unterschied zwischen Silo, Bunker Silo, Güllebehälter und Gärtank für Biogasanlagen. Du hast hier alles stumpf zu Silo gemacht, was nicht ganz passt, oder?

Schau doch mal durchs Wiki zu den Begriffen und mach nebenbei deine beiden "Silos" (das dürften Gärtanks sein) mit "O" rund. Und wie schonmal gesagt: Die Nodedichte in den Kreisen ist overkill. Das muss nicht :)

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165120755
wies1 (2025-04-18 20:25:31+00:00): Hallo,
muss ich mir die Tage nochmal näher anschauen. 
Gruss
wies1
wies1 (2025-04-18 21:34:04+00:00): Hallo
Wenn ich mir das Luftbild so anschaue, ist fuer mich der groesste "Kreis" ein slurry_tank. Bei den anderen beiden Kreisen  meine ich dass Silo hier richtig ist, als Gaertank kann ich diese nicht erkennen.
Bin unterwegs und komme an JOSM erst im Laufe der nächsten Woche wieder ran, so dass ich bis dahin an den Umrissen nichts andere. Vespucci hat ja kein Geometrie ersetzen - ist mit JOSM eindacher
Gruss wies1
silversurfer83 (2025-04-19 05:47:51+00:00): Alles klar

(Im Menü bei Vespucci gibt es auch die beiden Optionen "rechtwinklig" und "im kreis anordnen")
wies1 (2025-04-19 16:59:54+00:00): Hallo,
Ich habe die drei "Kreise" nun mit Vespucci rund gemacht, habe mal die entsprechende Funktion ausprobiert.
Gruss
wies1
mariotomo (2025-04-21 05:46:49+00:00): hola. por favor no se te olvide describir tus conjuntos de cambios. gracias.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 23:59:01+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12766468551/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle:repair and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service:bicycle:repair
eggie (2025-04-18 18:52:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
IvaLedinščak (2025-04-18 18:16:25+00:00): Accidental node creation #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165125550
rempshaener (2025-04-18 18:09:21+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.

Um einen Defi im OSM-Sinne daraus zu machen, bitte das 

emergency:phone=defibrillator
name=Defibrillator

entfernen und (mindestens) gegen

defibrillator:location=Parkplatz Rosenauer Straße
emergency=defibrillator
opening_hours=24/7

austauschen.

Laut aktueller Geometrie liegt der AED im Gebäude, daher bitte auch noch an den tatsächlichen Standort ziehen.

Bei Fragen bitte melden, ich schaue dann, wie ich unterstützen kann.

Viele Grüße
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-23 16:32:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12766498437/history - what kind of laser clinic? tattoo removal? LASIK surgery? Some pseudomedicine?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-18 18:00:45+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8859965851
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7733246933
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8859998963
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8859946129
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/782459872
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/890587691
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/782459870
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/782459871

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
jleedev (2025-04-22 01:09:10+00:00): Please don't do this — railway=abandoned is appropriate when the route still physically exists in the form of tunnels, bridge piers, and the graded way.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165262435
joost schouppe (2025-05-05 09:27:33+00:00): It makes sense you removed the name from the police station at way/96453978 , but I would also delete the amenity and the address info
c3112n (2025-05-05 17:23:01+00:00): I would have no problem if you removed the tag "amenity=police" from the building. But I would leave the address as it belongs to the building.
joost schouppe (2025-05-06 08:48:44+00:00): OK, I've adapted it as you suggested
SOSOwner (2025-04-18 18:18:14+00:00): (additional source: https://bustimes.org/services/21s-lifstan-way-canvey-newlands-creek-road#map)
Allison P (2025-04-18 20:46:35+00:00): Awesome, thank you!
CurlingMan13 (2025-04-19 18:04:27+00:00): If the road is physically seperated by a median, it should be mapped as two seperate one way.  I encourage you to review the following wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway

I have reverted the changeset.  Don't be discourage though - we've all started out new!  :)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165165556
dadavid (2025-04-18 19:05:22+00:00): Hi, wie ist denn emergency=hydrant gemeint? Also emergency=fire_hydrant meinst du ja nicht, oder? 

Vg 

David
bikepiper (2025-04-18 20:49:32+00:00): Hi,
  danke für den Hinweis.  Doch ich hatte eigentlich emergency=fire_hydrant gemeint, weil das Ding im Vorbeigehen so ausgesehen hat als wäre es beides.  Das stimmt aber nicht, ich hab grad nochmal nachgesehen, es ist nur ein Wasserhahn (mit dieser Schale für Hunde unten dran) und hab den Tag gleich entfernt.
eggie (2025-04-18 19:07:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-04-18 19:12:25+00:00): Dag Jan Alle begin is moeilijk. Het is geen leisure=park. Ik heb het omgezet naar landuse=grass (groenstrook) 

MVG
eggie
janhals (2025-04-18 20:36:11+00:00): Ha Eggie,
Dank voor de steun.
Groet,
Jan.
Frans S (2025-04-20 09:32:44+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A small remark.
Please do not connect nodes of buildings to each other. Map them as separate buildings. Hold the Ctr key down while mapping to avoid clicking together.|
Best regards
user_3022894 (2025-04-20 19:41:27+00:00): Hallo Sndpse,

wenn Adressen/Hausnummern innerhalb eines Gebäudes (oder an dessen Eingang) als Nodes platziert sind, brauchst du sie nicht nochmal extra an das Gebäude zu taggen (Beispiel der Doppelerfassung: www.openstreetmap.org/way/431168201).

Nodes für Adressen werden manchmal innerhalb von Gebäuden verwendet, um die "genaue Position" der Hausnummer wiederzugeben, wenn man nicht genau weiß, wo innerhalb des Gebäudes die Trennwand zwischen zwei Hausnummern verläuft oder wenn es sich nicht um eine einfache Doppelhaushälfte, die man vom Umriss her auftrennen kann, sondern um ein Gebäude mit einer "komplexeren" Hausnummernverteilung handelt. 

LG Lukas
eggie (2025-04-27 18:03:19+00:00): Dat Ronald Op dat barrier=block heb ik accestags toegevoegd zodat tweewielers weer routeren.
Neem aan dat maxspeed 80 hier wegkan.?

MVG
eggie
RonaldP68 (2025-04-27 18:24:26+00:00): Prima, dank je.
Tsja, die 80 had ik laten staan inderdaad. Lijkt me op zich goed die te verwijderen, nu er officieel geen autoverkeer meer in mag.
Mvg, RonaldP68
silversurfer83 (2025-04-18 19:47:07+00:00): Hi Aaron :)

just curious because I can't find a page in the Wiki explaining your use of the "path=*" tagging. Could you explain a bit?

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165127591
silversurfer83 (2025-05-11 16:49:08+00:00): any updates?
jleedev (2025-04-19 01:36:12+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165135792
Cleiton Mendes (2025-04-21 14:23:40+00:00): otimo
bielebog (2025-05-09 16:26:09+00:00): Hallo derBote,

dieser Eintrag sieht mir nicht nach einem Versehen aus. OpenStreetMap ist keine Spielwiese für Meinungsäußerungen. 
Bitte lösche Deine Änderung schnell wieder.
Und die hier ansässige Druckerei Lindhauer hat eine aktive Website https://lindhauer.de/ , was erst mal nicht auf Einstellung des Geschäfts hindeutet.
thetornado76 (2025-05-09 17:42:53+00:00): Ich habe es reverted!
aceman444 (2025-10-10 23:09:39+00:00): Zdravim, preco je ten chodnik na moste tvoreny 5 usekmi, ked maju vsetky rovnake vlastnosti? Stacil by jeden.
mcliquid (2025-04-19 06:44:52+00:00): Hi Simon, I imagine it was a change that wasn't yet uploaded, but please let me ask whether the bench in Berlin with check_date 2021 was actually intentional. Thank you!
b-jazz (2025-04-19 01:49:43+00:00): As I mentioned before in a previous changeset comment, you are breaking multipolygon relations. For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18974781. Please see the previous discussion (http://osm.org/changeset/164217730) and address those issues before making any more golf course edits involving multipolygons. Thanks.
Ronca123 (2025-04-19 08:50:08+00:00): Hi - Thanks for your feedback. I never received the previous post. I have been in discussion with a member of the course and they had feedback that I was aiming to fix.
b-jazz (2025-04-20 15:21:06+00:00): Hi Ronca, thanks for getting back to me. I'm glad to hear that you are fixing things, but it is unclear that you understood my message and are now familiar with relations and multipolygons and how to edit them. Can you please address those concerns? Thanks.
Allison P (2025-04-18 20:44:45+00:00): I would appreciate not changing the denomination of existing LDS churches to one with 10% as much usage. denomination=mormon already receives special support in the Carto renderer. If you want to change the tag then discuss in the community forum. The discussion could use revitaliation. I think few people are fond ofthe status quo. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposal-to-replace-denomination-mormon-with-denomination-latter-day-saint/116817

You changed the religion of the Boise Idaho Temple to "latt" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/903939183
Allison P (2025-04-18 20:45:44+00:00): Also, please use building=detached instead of building=house as appropriate in Ada County. It is more descriptive.
IronRod (2025-04-19 12:27:34+00:00): Regarding use of "latter_day_saints" as the denomination instead of "mormon": Please explain further.  The term "Mormon" is not the correct name for the denomination as noted by the organization itself.   The correct term is "Latter-Day Saint".  Also, in this instance (with the temple) it is actually a "place of worship" but is not a "church" in the conventional sense.  Please help me better understand your point.  And thank you for your kindness in bringing this up.

Regarding use of "building=detached":  In the houses I added, each appears with "Feature Type" of "Detached House" because I selected "House" and added the "detached" tag.  Are you suggesting something different?
Allison P (2025-04-19 19:27:57+00:00): The use of denomination=mormon dates back to when that was the official name (church website was mormon.org). Even since, mormon has been by far the most popular choice for new additions, and thus the one recognized by data consumers.

For the temple, building=temple is enough to tag it as not a church (even if a lot of data consumers might still interpret it as such). The value of religion still needs to be fixed, though.

Apologies for missing that you used the building=house house=detached tagging scheme. That is only used frequently in Ireland. Basically every other country uses building=detached far more frequently.
IronRod (2025-04-19 19:51:50+00:00): I only selected the house=detached as that was the settings used for all of the existing homes in that area; i.e., just following what had already been done.  It doesn't seem to make sense to change it given that all of the other houses in that area are designated that way.

I certainly understand the historical aspect of using "mormon".  Of course, that was name was applied by those outside the membership.  While it has historic use -- and would be willing to go with that for consistency -- the fact that there is already an existing entry for "latter-day-saint" tells me that this is already being used elsewhere.  Note that I did not create that entry; simply typing "lat" brought it up so I selected it.  Thoughts?
IronRod (2025-04-19 19:54:25+00:00): As to changing from "church" to "place of worship", I again feel that change is correct.  The "place of worship" already exists -- I did not add it -- and it is much more appropriate to the building's use than "church".  Simply having the name "temple" is not sufficient, in my opinion, to convey that.  Can you share history on why "place of worship" would not be desired here?  It seems to me that calling it a church -- which it is not -- implies it is there for regular services and open to the public, which it is not.
Allison P (2025-04-19 20:32:22+00:00): It appears because it is used elsewhere, just at a much lower rate. Check the wiki. There are less than 800 uses compared to 8000 for denomination=mormon.

You did not change a church to a place of worship, you changed religion to latt, which is unrecognized. This caused your editor to identify it as a generic place of worship. Before you made this change, the editor called it a church, but that does not mean it is one.

All the nearby homes I checked are building=detached, not building=house house=detached, so I don't know what you're talking about there.
IronRod (2025-04-19 21:47:54+00:00): Actually, I manually changed the temple from "Church" to "Place of Worship" by selecting it.  It did not do that automatically.  It was an intentional change on my part.

You mentioned checking the wiki -- which I did -- and found this page which is the topic we are discussing and, I believe, making the same point.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:denomination%3Dmormon

I wondered if there was some kind of typo because I wasn't seeing the "latt" you mentioned.  But I looked deeper and found that.  It was my error by entry in the wrong field; I've corrected that.

I see what you are saying about the building=detached vs house=detached.  I had just selected House and then added the detached tag.  But I saw the difference and believe I have now made the changes as I think they should be per your notes.  Feel free to check and confirm.
viupu (2025-04-20 13:32:35+00:00): Millä perusteella tämä tie on primary-luokassa (eli kantatie luokassa). Tie on yksiselitteisesti seututie eli kuuluu secondary-luokkaan. Mikään muukaan maaseudulla kulkeva seututie ei ole OpenStreetMapissa Suomen alueella primary-luokassa. Kehotan korjaamaan tien takaisin secondary-luokkaan.
viupu (2025-04-21 17:47:07+00:00): Muutoskokoelma peruttu virheellisen muokkauksen takia. Tie 387 kuuluu secondary-luokkaan. Linkki: keskusteluun aiheesta: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/lappeenrannan-seudun-tieluokitukset/128994

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165251876
viupu (2025-04-20 13:32:51+00:00): Millä perusteella tämä tie on primary-luokassa (eli kantatie luokassa)? Tie on yksiselitteisesti seututie eli kuuluu secondary-luokkaan. Mikään muukaan maaseudulla kulkeva seututie ei ole OpenStreetMapissa Suomen alueella primary-luokassa. Kehotan korjaamaan tien takaisin secondary-luokkaan.