piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-21 16:38:37+00:00): Putting the street names on the sidewalk would be useful for navigation.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147116577
b-jazz (2024-02-14 18:27:03+00:00): Thanks for the contributions loralyn. There are a couple of problems that exist with adding the fact that the school is part of the town. First, you shouldn't just draw an arbitrary way (line) and tag it as being a town. The town boundary already exists and it should be modified. Another problem is the truth of that school belonging to the town of Ebensburg or Cambria. I don't have enough knowledge as I'm not a local so I don't want to make the corrections myself without knowing the history. But it seems like your way (1246747603) should be deleted at the least, and then some clarification should be made as to where the school actually belongs.
fūrai-bō_ (2024-02-07 07:47:00+00:00): 御池通から天性寺に通じる2本の実在しない道路が引かれています。
おそらく天性寺の敷地内道路を誤って御池通につなげてしまったのだと思います。修正されたほうが良いでしょう。
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-06 11:12:46+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

If a way is not accessible to the public, add the access=private or access=no and don't delete the way.

Can you please revert your map edits? Thanks.
ElliottPlack (2024-02-16 04:41:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 147515477 where the changeset comment is: reverting vandalism to US Capitol and nonsense edits adding parks where none exist
yawfle (2024-02-06 22:14:29+00:00): Hello there! For future reference, if you create a building in such a way that it slightly intersects an adjacent one, and iD complains about it, tagging it as layer=-1 is NOT the fix. Doing that implies the first building is *underneath* the other one. :-)

I fixed the outline, removed the layer tag, and restored the building data tags that were lost when you (accidentally?) deleted the original outline. Cheers.
danctc (2024-02-09 17:49:21+00:00): Hi
This avenue had its traffic changed recently, making it one-way on each road. Therefore, your change is incorrect.
hybridOL (2025-12-12 14:35:33+00:00): Are you sure that here in the wilderness we have some ATMs?
opendcc (2024-02-06 08:51:01+00:00): Wie im CS-Kommentar zur Nameänderung geschrieben: Dorfgemeinschaftshaus, d.h. auch die Description ist vermutlich falsch.
Supaplex (2024-02-07 01:48:26+00:00): 應該不是重覆的地址，而是QA工具沒考慮東亞狀況，沒列入樓層
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147120215
Supaplex (2024-02-07 02:03:07+00:00): iD下有多重選擇工具，你可以看是多個樓層與之幾，應該是沒重覆，之所以有樓層是資料來源是戶政那邊，會收到幾樓之幾的地址
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147120215
Supaplex (2024-02-07 02:17:39+00:00): 我重新對過了，應該不是重複地址，就幾樓之幾問題，那些QA工具誤判以為是重複
arjunaraoc (2024-03-05 09:51:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my improvement: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148242117
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147120237
moje_konto (2024-02-06 12:35:53+00:00): Most nie wygląda poprawnie, to duży obszar o różnych poziomach, teraz to się przecina:

www.openstreetmap.org/way/331450413

www.openstreetmap.org/way/428769639
worldqafix (2024-02-06 17:32:57+00:00): I'll split the bridge on parts.
Frans S (2024-02-09 12:55:22+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147120891
mini-me (2024-02-06 23:35:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1027364778
addr:city должно совпадать с name населённого пункта (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/244211730) т.е. без "деревня".
Перед корпусами/строениями/итп нужен пробел. Пример: 42Б к2 c1
Frans S (2024-02-11 09:26:56+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Rather precise mapped however:
buildings not squared.
Connected nodes of buildings to other features or buildings
Collected multiple buildings , mapped as 1 building.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147121532
eggie (2024-02-06 08:35:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-02-06 09:12:44+00:00): Feedback maxwidth gebruiken als het middels een bord staat aangeven.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147122064

Zie hier het verschil:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxwidth

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width

Moet het dus niet gewoon width zijn?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-02-06 09:14:04+00:00): Even gespiekt.. Het staat middels een bord aangegeven.. Dus het is correctt getagd.

MVG
eggie
Leo Slager (2024-02-06 10:47:16+00:00): Even verder kijken:
RVV bord C17:
het is dus wel max lengte.
eggie (2024-02-06 10:52:42+00:00): Yep .. het is de lengte.. 'k Zie dat het al wordt aangepast.
eggie (2024-02-06 10:55:05+00:00): Zal ook voor de westelijk doorgang zo zijn
Leo Slager (2024-02-06 11:10:41+00:00): Denk het niet.
Het zal een gebied zijn waar lange voertuigen zich vast rijden.
Leuk project om uit te zoeken of andere toegangswegen ook die beperking kennen.
eggie (2024-02-06 11:13:36+00:00): Oke.. maar dacht te zien dat daar ook maxbreedte was toegevoegd.
Leo Slager (2024-02-06 11:16:54+00:00): Dan kan dat ook weg.
eggie (2024-02-06 11:18:13+00:00): Done
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-06 07:30:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9971971398

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2024-02-11 10:07:29+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped. Outlines not correct followed.
Buildings not squared.
Clustered buildings. Mapped as 1.
Included a courtyard in your mapping.
Included the shadow. This shadow also shows the width of the building. Don't map further.
Oversized mapped.
This comment is valid for all your changesets here.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147122631
eggie (2024-02-06 08:42:19+00:00): Beste Sailor   Er is hier nog geen sprake van nieuwbouw en de wegen zijn nog niet aanwezig.
Gebruikelijk is het dan om een weg dat in te tekenen met highway=proposed met proposed=residential

Worden de wegen al aangelegd?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-02-06 08:43:28+00:00): Aanvulling.. We tekenen dus geen plannen in.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-02-06 08:54:38+00:00): landuse=greenfield zolang er nog niet wordt gebouwd. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgreenfield

Situatie december
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=06-02-2023&loc=51.88420%2C5.997323%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-12-03&acqid=20231203_111030_SVNEO-01&sensor=SuperView-NEO
SailorSeahorse (2024-02-06 15:27:21+00:00): Dag Eggie,

De twee wegen zijn zichtbaar in het terrein en het plangebied (waarvan ik de contour heb ontleend aan het omgevingsplan die het beste overeenkomt met de situatie buiten) wordt nu bouwrijp gemaakt. 
Plaatselijke kennis is actueler als de satelliet ;-)
eggie (2024-02-06 15:29:46+00:00): Oke... up to the local mapper.
Gr eggie
Frans S (2024-02-12 12:06:50+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. however, buildings not squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147123110
yzal (2024-02-06 16:18:34+00:00): Dobrý deň, pokiaľ už je vyznačená adresa na budove, alebo ako samostatný bod, pokiaľ je v budove viacero adries, nie je potrebné pridávať adresné údaje aj na samostatné prevádzky. Jedná sa o duplicitu a existujúce adresy majú spravidla viacero údajov o adrese. Vyhľadávanie podľa adresy bude fungovať tak či tak.
yzal (2024-02-06 16:24:16+00:00): Viac napríklad v tomto príspevku https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/WR50sA9jJHs/m/Nr6fu57AAgAJ alebo si môžete prečítať celú diskusiu.
miron70 (2024-02-07 08:02:12+00:00): Ked vyplnim adresu na pridavanom bode robi to potom nejake problemy ?  Nemam moc skusenosti, tak sa pytam
yzal (2024-02-27 13:47:03+00:00): Trochu neskorá reakcia ale predsa.
Ako som písal jedná sa o zbytočnú duplicitu plus tie adresy čo sú na budovách obsahujú kompletnejšie údaje o adrese. Tiež niektoré editory na úpravu údajov to hlásia ako chybu kvôli nekompletnej adrese. Adresy sa tiež prideľujú budovám a nie konkrétnym prevádzkam, takže keď sa prevádzka presťahuje, stačí premiestniť bod a nemusí sa meniť adresa. Z môjho pohľadu to nemá žiadnu výhodu a je to práca naviac.

Možno môže človeka miasť pri vyhľadávaní adresy, že nájde viac rovnakých adries (aj keď je pravda že všetky blízko pri sebe). 

Tiež už nejaký čas prebieha snaha zosúladiť adresy v OSM so štátnym registrom adries, čiže pridať/doplniť všetky existujúce adresy, odstrániť duplicity, neexistujúce adresy alebo zle umiestnené adresy a pridáva sa adresám jednoznačný identifikátor tag ref:minvskaddress aby sa dali automaticky sledovať zmeny.
miron70 (2024-02-28 08:13:46+00:00): Teraz ked pridavam body, ktore su v budove, tak uz vacsinou nedavam adresu.
Dakujem za info.
Frans S (2024-02-11 09:10:50+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)I reviewed several changeset.
Inaccurate mapped. Follow outlines more precise, including extensions.
Buildings not squared.
Connected nodes to other features.
Highway unclassified mapped. Path is better option ( just 1 mtr wide)


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147123260
Frans S (2024-02-07 11:14:22+00:00): Hello,  Long time since we both were working on projects, Tanzania, wasn't it ?
A question here.
You used both bing and Esri to map from.
Please align the Esri imagery with Bing.
Now I get an offset on the buildings you mapped from Esri.
Best regards
HirschKauz (2024-08-21 17:39:48+00:00): Hi,  
- Du hast einige Straße mit vehicle=no getaggt - dadurch werden keine Fahrzeuge (nicht einmal Fahrrad) durch diese Straßen ge-routet. Lies gerne mal hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access  
--- 
ach... und Living_street braucht kein max_speed: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dliving_street#Verwendung_in_Deutschland (eine gemalte 7 auf dem Asphalt ist kein Verkehrszeichen)  

Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß
habib_amir (2024-02-07 07:56:35+00:00): Дорога перекрыта https://bk55.ru/news/article/227068/
habib_amir (2024-02-07 07:57:07+00:00): https://ngs55.ru/text/transport/2023/11/23/72944204/
chris66 (2025-08-17 13:53:17+00:00): Hi,
ist die Brücke gesperrt oder wieso das access=no?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1246799280

Grüße
Chris
joey_geoloog (2024-02-06 09:01:27+00:00): Crossing ways error message won't clear, I have made a slight adjustment to the path to avoid intersection with a house. Please adjust intersection further on project if you can find it!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147125161
habib_amir (2024-02-07 07:47:26+00:00): Дорога перекрыта и перекопана. Верните статус строительства.
julcnx (2024-02-06 13:23:55+00:00): Hi Napittha, please remember to include the width tag when you have the information. Legal access tags such as motorcar=no should only be used if signed, and they're unnecessary for motorcycle paths. I've made the adjustment accordingly.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147125442
TrickyFoxy (2024-02-07 14:09:38+00:00): Не используйте Google-панорамы — их нельзя использовать в OSM
VLD075 (2024-08-30 18:38:56+00:00): Hello Palgrave Peter,

I was just curious about one of the features you've edited. For w846681384 is this meant to extend all the way into the road way at this location? Or could it better be pushed back to follow the sidewalk instead? Thank you so much!
Palgrave Peter (2024-08-31 17:08:45+00:00): Having thought about it, I reckon that although its a wide pavement, its no more than that, so I have changed it accordingly.
VLD075 (2024-09-04 15:29:24+00:00): Hi Palgrave Peter,

Thanks for having a look at this. I appreciate the changes you've made to this location! Thank you!
maraf24 (2024-04-13 20:55:43+00:00): Proszę o nieusuwanie tagu is_in:village.
To, że JOSM coś takiego proponuje nie oznacza, że tag jest zbędny.
gsapijaszko (2024-04-15 18:19:32+00:00): Sorry maraf, jeśli Ci coś uszkodziłem, nie było to moją intencją. Natomiast jeśli gdzieś brakuje granic, które w zasadzie powinny zastąpić is_in, to chętnie uzupełnię.
maraf24 (2024-04-15 19:00:35+00:00): Granice nie mogą zastąpić is_in:village, bo przecież wsie nie mają oficjalnych granic.
gscholz (2024-02-28 08:04:50+00:00): Hi jappache,
your recent edits have created several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=1.03567&lat=43.79129&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147127075

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the map. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
mavl (2024-02-23 18:52:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147818131, 147828921 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
SomeoneElse (2024-02-10 12:27:28+00:00): Just wondered - should https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102802561 be part of the Greensand Way route?  It seems to be not connected to anything (found via http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=57416 ).
arjunaraoc (2024-03-05 09:54:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my partial improvement: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148242250   Please add the name for the clinic
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147127279
arjunaraoc (2024-03-05 09:56:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my improvement: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148242351
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147127469
UG Sośnie (2024-02-06 10:40:43+00:00): Dodam, bo znalazłem jeszcze jedną informację, Błociec jest dopływem Polskiej Wody
emersonveenstra (2024-02-07 12:33:00+00:00): Hi there,

When you edited https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5530651, you disconnected it from the connecting road, so now routers cannot correctly use it. Can you please fix this, and be sure to always double check that ways are connected in the future!
Claudius Henrichs (2024-04-27 18:43:51+00:00): Thanks for fixing that. No idea how that slipped through as JOSM would normally flag these duplicate unconnected nodes on upload.
TrickyFoxy (2024-02-06 10:08:19+00:00): У вас что-то явно пошло не так и получился дом на весь район :)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147128216
bxl-forever (2024-02-06 10:37:55+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for wanting to improve schools.  I am writing to you because I am afraid there might be a few issues here.

In your changeset description, you are talking about a single school, but you modified 3 different schools, all at once.

Also, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397937158/history: in version #2 it was properly tagged as a school.  You created a version #3 and removed amenity=school to replace it with area=yes.  As a consequence, now this school has disappeared from the map.  Is this a mistake?

Please reply below this message, so that we’ll discuss how to fix this.
Moritz Lennert (2024-02-06 11:01:57+00:00): Hello,

Yes this was a mistake. Thanks for picling this up so quickly !

I looked at two other schools (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30499962 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397937158 to get a clearer vision of how schools are defined before creating the school https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177665619.

I have no idea why the first two were included in the changeset, that was not my intention.

If possible, it is probably best to revert my changes and I'll try again on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177665619, without touching the others.
Moritz Lennert (2024-02-06 13:11:39+00:00): I reverted the change using http://revert.osmz.ru/ (https://revert.monicz.dev/ did not let me because I need 10 edits to use it). Here's the reverting changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147134997.
I hope this repaired things for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397937158 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30499962.

Now I need to figure out how to correctly declare that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177665619 is actually a school (https://www.espmaritime.be/).
bxl-forever (2024-02-06 13:23:55+00:00): Thanks for writing back.

There are 3 possible ways to map a school: either you create a single node which represents the school, or you reuse an existing building—that is only if the school is just that building and nothing more—or you draw a perimeter all around the school premises (it includes the school but also the schoolyard, gardens, etc.); a good example is here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32974723
Moritz Lennert (2024-02-06 13:40:18+00:00): At this stage, the school is just this building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177665619. That is what I tried to reuse for creating the school. 
As far as I know, two buildings are currently being renovated to be integrated into the school (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243138364 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177665555) , but they are not ready, yet. So I imagine at this stage they should not be labeled as being part of the school ?
bxl-forever (2024-02-06 18:38:40+00:00): All right.  In that case, mapping it as a separate area is the best option, so that it can be extended later to include more buildings.
Here it is:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1246953468
opendcc (2024-04-28 08:42:08+00:00): Ähm, das sind Zelte, die nur 3 Wochen im Jahr stehen ...
uvi (2024-02-06 15:32:32+00:00): Hallo Jortusinfo, du hast hier einen "Biergarten" erfasst. ist das wirklich ein  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=biergarten?uselang=de mit der Option "Ein traditioneller  Biergarten oder fränkisch  Bierkeller ist eine Fläche im Freien, meist unter Schatten spendenden Bäumen, auf der in der wärmeren Jahreszeit Bier und andere Getränke ausgeschenkt werden. Es ist erlaubt eigenes Essen (Brotzeit) mitzubringen, selbst wenn Speisen verkauft werden. "
Das ist in OSM ein "falscher Freund", denn Außensitzbereiche werden als outdoor_seating eingetragen (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Doutdoor_seating ).
Darüber hinaus sollten geschlossene Objekte nicht mit opening_hours=closed versehen werden. Besser wäre disused:amenity=restaurant , dann kann der Rest erhalten bleiben. Aber das war dein Vorgänger ;)
VG Uwe
uvi (2024-02-06 15:34:14+00:00): Ich war im übrigen heute vormittag selbst vor Ort und bin etwas unsicher: war das nicht ein indisches Restaurant??
uvi (2024-02-06 15:34:59+00:00): https://maharani-freiberg.de/
Jortusinfo (2024-02-06 16:15:08+00:00): Hallo, ja es ist ein indisches, ok wenn Biergarten rein deutsch meint, dann muß es anders sein.  Welche Option gibt es für gemütlichen Außenbereich

LG
Jortusinfo (2024-02-06 16:18:54+00:00): ah, geklärt   Außengastronomie.
uvi (2024-02-07 04:45:25+00:00): magst du es selbst korrigieren?
Jortusinfo (2024-02-09 21:30:02+00:00): Hallo, ist es jetzt so korrekt?

Muß ja auch noch hinzulernen, aber es ist ne interessante Sache.
uvi (2024-02-10 14:34:55+00:00): Ist das ein indisches Restaurant? Dann sollte der neue Name name=Maharani ran! Und evtl. old_name=Zum Bergschlösschen. Das closed bei den Öffnungszeiten weg und dafür die neuen Öffnungszeiten. Wir schaffen das schon. Habe am Anfang auch viel lernen müssen und mache bestimmt immer noch Fehler 😉
Jortusinfo (2024-02-11 20:16:42+00:00): Ok, beide Namen hätten Berechtigung, denn der alte Name steht immernoch am Haus dran und das ist auch gut.

Bist du auch aus FG ?
uvi (2024-02-12 17:02:08+00:00): Ich habe es jetzt mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147376096 angepasst. Ich denke ,mit dem alten Namen am Gebäude und dem Restaurantname am Restaurant passt es am besten. 
Komme aus der Nähe von FG
Jortusinfo (2024-02-16 16:46:25+00:00): ok   Danke und ein schönes Wochenende!