piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-10-30 07:29:29+00:00): İnşa halindeki yapıların doğru etiketleme şeması şurada anlatılmış. Hatalı etiketleri düzelttim. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction

"nolur kontrol edin" ifadeniz kastettiğiniz yolların geometrileri ise, güncel uydu görüntüleri olmadığı için o konuda bir değişiklik yapmadım.
eggie (2025-10-29 20:43:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Frans S (2025-11-18 11:34:10+00:00): Hello.
About your notes path or track.
Measure the width of a trace with the 'building=building (round) and read the measurement on the botton.
Smaller than 3 mtr = path
wider =unclassified.
The through going traces don't meet the qualification for a track.
Best regards
user_5359 (2025-10-30 06:48:00+00:00): ## Movement of  a node
Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved two nodes https://www.osm.org/node/11227635392, https://www.osm.org/node/7047003588 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the nodes back to the original position.
AndersAndersson (2025-10-29 21:28:39+00:00): Is the bridge closed for bicycle and pedestrians?
jodjod (2025-10-30 15:29:57+00:00): Yes it is, since 2023: https://torsby.se/trafikresor/trafikochgator/hangbrontorsbyoleby.4.bebd23c18c3dd352e07d17.html

Feel free to correct my change. Until now the bridge is still mapped as usable, which it is not in reality.
AndersAndersson (2025-10-30 16:23:50+00:00): Thanks for the info! I changed bicyle and foot to no on the bridge.
fndoder (2025-10-29 23:52:32+00:00): А точно нет ошибки в названии улицы?

Согласно сообщению мэрии - https://kzn.ru/meriya/press-tsentr/novosti/v-privolzhskom-rayone-kazani-poyavitsya-shest-novykh-ulits/ - так назвали улицу в Брайт парке, то есть на заметном отдалении от Константиновки.

Отдельно замечу, что согласно OSM wiki, name тут должен записываться как "Панорамная улица", но это уже второстепенный вопрос, надо вначале с местом улицы определиться.
dmjab13 (2025-10-31 14:15:32+00:00): this change set is a little wide- please try and keep edits like this to one state or area at a time
MassCartog (2025-10-30 02:10:19+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground already. Not being public access areas yet is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. Also, a feature under construction is also valid to be included in OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=no would be appropriate if its closed to the public still. You can also use the tag Key:construction. So tags like highway=construction and construction=path.

Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access, and you can change the tags once the trail officially opens. 

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction
Căprar Andrei (2025-10-29 21:26:51+00:00): extra source: survey
Frans S (2025-11-17 10:11:40+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
Please tag a highway track width >3 mtr not as path. Here, a through going highway is best to tag highway=unclassified and surface= unpaved.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-11-17 10:24:38+00:00): Hello . Thanks for mapping on this project.
When you map a road near the edge of your task, please map it a bit over the edge of your task. Another mapper on the adjacent task see this and can contiune that road. 
Otherwise it will not been seen.
A track wider than 3 mtr is not to be tagged as a path, but as an unclassified highway.
Best regards
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-30 06:42:59+00:00): Hi, 
some names have been changed again in this changeset. 
Could you please respond to the questions in the other changeset? 

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=18943099

Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-30 06:42:26+00:00): Hi, 
some names have been changed again in this changeset. 
Could you please respond to the questions in the other changeset? 

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=18943099

Thanks.
aceman444 (2026-07-11 10:30:41+00:00): Zdravim, ma zmysel pridavat povodne nazvy ulic aj na budovy? Hlavne v old_name to vyzera ako stary nazov budovy, co asi nie je spravne. Ak to tam treba, potom by asi znacka mala byt nieco ako old_addr:street.
aceman444 (2026-07-11 10:30:54+00:00): Myslim napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58371701/history/11
Jose Riha (2026-07-13 05:27:01+00:00): dakujem, jednalo sa o chybu. opravene
felipeeugenio (2025-10-29 22:01:46+00:00): Note	Contributor	Tmstmp UTC	Action	Comment
5028988 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5029002 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5028995 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5029009 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5028990 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5028997 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5029004 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5028985 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5028999 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5029006 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5028992 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5028865 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5028987 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5028994 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5029001 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5029008 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5028989 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5028996 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5029003 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5028991 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5028984 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5028998 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5028878 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5029005 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5028993 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5028986 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5029000 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
5029007 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-10-29 23:00	closed	ok
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-29 22:20:53+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawną składnię. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres strony internetowej został skrócony przez serwis typu URL shortener. Przekazując adres strony, upewnij się, że jest on w pełnej, bezpośredniej formie.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202038851

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
philippec (2025-10-29 22:28:47+00:00): Dat is een oude foto.
Die dingen veranderen regelmatig van plaats en van vorm.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.095806&lng=3.8308472&z=19.9&pKey=1055269586568030&focus=photo&x=0.05144693437091069&y=0.46501110954668995&zoom=1.566590937473895
kabelhaai (2025-10-30 10:59:22+00:00): Zeer onduidelijke foto wel. Je ziet het bijna niet. Opteer je om dit aan te passen of zo te laten want het verschilt enkele meters?
philippec (2025-10-30 12:31:07+00:00): Op die pilaar is duidelijk niets, toch niets op de plaats van de vroegere foto.
In dit geval heb ik er geen bezwaar tegen het toch te mappen met een fixme en een note.  Er zijn voldoende aanwijzingen dat er een AED is, en waarschijnlijk buiten.
Alhoewel, mijn ervaring is dat je nooit iets mag veronderstellen.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-29 22:51:43+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13269002924
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1032977374

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-30 06:41:44+00:00): Hi, 
some names have been changed again in this changeset. 
Could you please respond to the questions in the other changeset? 

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=18943099

Thanks.
BCNorwich (2025-10-31 08:47:20+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately, you made quite a few mistakes here, as indicated by the warnings given above. The unjoined crossing highways and many duplicated sections of highways are particularly problematic as they would disrupt routing. 

I think I've fixed all the highway problems, but several more minor problems likely remain.

Please take care when mapping or correcting highways. Please don't duplicate any highways or sections of highways. Please don't cross a highway over another without joining them. 

Regards Bernard.
Scout Jens (2026-02-10 13:42:53+00:00): Ich sehe den Nutzen nicht: Unterirdische Versorgungsleitungen... Das sprengt den Rahmen von OSM für mich. Glasfaser, Strom, Wasser, Abwasser, Gas, und und und 
Da hat man richtig zu tun mit den Anpassungen - nur sieht man die Leitungen ja nicht. Deswegen gibt es m. E. den Konsen, dass man nur Dinge einträgt, die zu sehen sind (oberirdisch) - natürlich mit Ausnahmen (Straßentunnel, etc.). Aber Glasfaserkabel? Ernsthaft?
Lived428 (2026-02-11 16:48:52+00:00): Hallo. Ich Mappe für die Karte
https://openinframap.org/
Dort geht es hauptsächlich um die Infrastruktur und auch entsprechend um die Untererdischen Kabel. Auch die Telekommunikation wie Oberleitungen, Vermittlungsstellen und Glasfaserkabel... Es ist ein gutes stück arbeit, ja. Aber ich mache es in meiner Freizeit und hoste selber zuhause eine kleine Map, da mich diese sachen interesiert. Es gibt ja nicht nur OSM sondern auch maps, wie OIM, die die daten aus OSM nehmen und nur die Infratruktur oder Gasleitungen etc ausflisten. OSM ist einfach "alles zusammen"...
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-30 06:40:51+00:00): Hi, 
some names have been changed again in this changeset. 
Could you please respond to the questions in the other changeset? 

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=18943099

Thanks.
Joske1020 (2025-10-30 19:17:19+00:00): naar het Noorden: de eerste 2 duikers zijn er niet, de beekjes stromen gewoon over het pad.
(1446156906, 1446156910)
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=630871388306642 2de beek ook een paar meter verleggen? aiv hillshade ziet er betrouwbaarder uit
zal ik morgen ook nakijken.
kabelhaai (2025-10-30 19:22:39+00:00): ok, aangepast https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446155491
Glassman (2025-10-29 23:01:45+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 172501426.
kechan_Rapid (2025-10-29 23:04:49+00:00): *and roads
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-30 06:40:40+00:00): Hi, 
some names have been changed again in this changeset. 
Could you please respond to the questions in the other changeset? 

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=18943099

Thanks.
Andrea Musuruane (2025-11-11 15:44:47+00:00): Hi. The location of the camper area is wrong. These are parking for the Carabinieri. The correct location should be on the on the north-est side of the parking: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1347212023179057 BR, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173951723
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-12-01 22:24:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175378570 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some pre war Polish names; these do not belong in OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19062
trigpoint (2025-11-09 16:42:49+00:00): Is this verifiable?

Maybe OHM, not something that belongs in OSM which should be thing that are there now.

Cheers Phil
redd (2026-01-13 21:41:57+00:00): Hallo Enzyklopädix,
es wäre sehr hilfreich, wenn du im Changeset-Kommentar eine tatsächliche Zusammenfassung deiner Änderungen beschreiben würdest. 

Den Kommentar "Details Verlauf Wege und Flächen präzisiert." scheinst du sehr häufig zu verwenden. In diesem Changeset ist das etwas irreführend. 

Vielen Dank und Grüße,

redd
hybridOL (2025-11-06 16:01:57+00:00): Du hast hier die Busbuchten mit area:highway=bus_stop markiert. Das ist kein gebräuchliches Tagging. Für Busbuchten wird bus_bay=right/left/both als Teil der Straße genommen, die Fläche selbst wird nicht weiter angelegt.
worldtest (2025-11-15 09:35:54+00:00): Hierbei handelt es sich um Micromapping. Die Straßenflächen werden separat genau eingezeichnet. Für die Busbucht wurde sich hierdran orientiert: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Street_area
Ob nicht area:highway=bus_bay sinnvoller wäre, bin ich mir selber nicht sicher.
Wie auch immer, dies soll keinesfalls das von dir genannte bus_bay an der Straße selber erstzen, sondern ist nur eine Ergänzung. Gerne kannst du das fehlende bus_bay nachholen, das ist ein sehr guter Vorschlag.
NeisBot (2025-10-29 23:56:35+00:00): Hi pophob, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-10-29 23:56:35+00:00): Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added surveillance cameras with ALPR type, Flock Safety manufacturer, for school and traffic zones"
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-30 00:41:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264845537
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264845539

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13269312673
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306611690

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
aTarom (2025-11-02 12:51:19+00:00): Hi, why is the elevation re-added? Is it just a simple elevation value without any other tags?
Cheers
vanagaudi (2025-11-02 14:39:20+00:00): Hello, you're right. In the past within this area I added some elevation information in case there there was an elevation information post beside the street. I checked Mapillary for this junction and the mentioned post is missing. So I removed the elevation information again.
Regards
Alliegaytor (2025-10-30 01:08:38+00:00): Please make sure that you don't forget to connect the driveways to the road rather than just the footpath (unlike what you've done here)
RahilPasha (2025-10-31 03:43:50+00:00): Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you.
TrickyFoxy (2025-11-15 14:50:38+00:00): Не пишите капсом
TrickyFoxy (2025-11-14 19:57:07+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее
TrickyFoxy (2025-11-14 19:57:22+00:00): И ещё, после того как нарисовали здание не забывайте нажимать Q, чтобы выпрямить его
MassCartog (2025-10-30 02:21:16+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Even decommissioned trails should not be removed until they no longer exist. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

I went ahead and updated to use private tags and the correct feature types. 

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property
Rainero (2025-10-31 09:35:36+00:00): Hi Glassman,
yould you please explain why you removed the elevator building?
In version 5 you have reverted the nonsense that the user Tourism_info has added in version 4. So far okay.  Did you delete the building accidentally?

Best regards,
Rainer
Glassman (2025-10-31 16:33:23+00:00): Sorry about that, that was a mistake. I have, hopefully, undid the error.
Rainero (2025-10-31 19:51:25+00:00): Great, thank you both for the quick answer and the restoration.
NM$L (2025-12-31 12:42:44+00:00): Hi. Could you please explain why you moved the place label of Tsona?
NeisBot (2025-10-30 04:56:26+00:00): Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Removed toilet amenities, including name and attributes"
NeisBot (2025-10-30 04:56:26+00:00): Hi LanceSong77, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
ika-chan! (2025-10-30 02:40:38+00:00): The destination waypoint name mentioned on the EO6 and EO15 relation is Mourgani bridge, not Mourgani.
Alliegaytor (2025-10-30 03:06:04+00:00): Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

In this changeset you've added a building that shares nodes with the SRL East way.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446183081/history/1

As the buildings on the surface do not connect to or are attached to an underground construction way in anyway, they should not share nodes with each other.

I've removed the nodes from the SRL in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173955146.

Please take care not to attach buildings nodes to the SRL in future.

Also, if you can contact the smart-cities-transport-project-71 organiser and inform them that some mappers keep adding nodes to the SRL, it would be much appreciated. I am unable to find the contact information of the organiser who's responsible for the mapping through the smartcitiestransport website without making an account.
aharvey (2025-10-30 04:45:46+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/TomTom

> TomTom is actively organizing mapping events. All edits made during those events are distinguished by the hashtag #tt_events.

> If you have remarks about a specific edit of ours, please drop a comment in the changeset, and we will do our best to respond thoughtfully. Or, you can also:  

> Reach out to osm@tomtom.com with any questions
> Join the conversation in the local community channels

They are active in the OSM Discord #oceania channel.
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-13 06:24:22+00:00): User has been blocked and changesets have been reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174413988
DanhengOSM (2025-11-18 02:00:56+00:00): 跨过公园中部河流的新建铁路桥似乎有自身名称？需查证
DLRN (2025-11-08 12:55:15+00:00): Этот дом был снесён еще давно 
https://t.me/mariupolnow/27927?single
Akrimullah (2025-10-30 09:12:36+00:00): Halo Mba/Mas, bisa bergabung ke grup telegram OSM Indonesia ? disana nanti bisa saling diskusi dan sharing terkait mapping di OSM ya. t.me/osmindonesia
dcskobuffs (2025-10-31 21:39:48+00:00): Hello 5m4u9,

I see you updated refs along Ruta Fundamental 49 to F. Did you mean to make these F49 since this is along (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19772914)?

Hola 5m4u9,

Veo que actualizaste las referencias de la Ruta Fundamental 49 a F. ¿Querías decir F49, ya que está relacionada con (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19772914)?
5m4u9 (2025-11-01 05:34:58+00:00): Hi, yes. When I was updating the roads, I forgot to put the number 49. sorry.
dcskobuffs (2025-11-04 14:48:19+00:00): Thank you for taking another look, happy mapping!
Alliegaytor (2025-10-30 04:35:43+00:00): The driveway and footpath should have a connecting node at the intersection of the ways
RahilPasha (2025-10-31 04:08:24+00:00): "Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have connected walkway and driveway nodes . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well.
aharvey (2025-11-04 10:56:35+00:00): I've reverted this changeset since it appears to be related to a temporary event and per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features we don't map these kinds of temporary events in OSM.
keithonearth (2025-11-14 19:18:11+00:00): I'm impressed by how quick you gotten this newly opened bicycle path mapped. And I've noticed other spots you've gotten quickly too. Thanks!
krmatthews (2025-11-18 04:13:46+00:00): You're welcome. I had an eye on the traffic camera at Fir/5th and went to check it out as soon as it appeared to be open.
nevw (2025-10-30 05:40:47+00:00): correction: source was Protected areas of Queensland 2025.
NeisBot (2025-10-30 05:18:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-30 05:18:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Allstate agent in Sugar Land"
skquinn (2025-10-30 06:20:37+00:00): I removed the blatant rubbish/ad copy description.
NeisReview (2025-11-01 19:25:03+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173958848

Thanks, skquinn
cowboyxup (2025-10-30 06:37:04+00:00): Hallo EinEngener,

Die Bildlinks sind nicht aufrufbar (Login required), das sind nicht die öffentlichen Links von wikimedia commons.

Für Bilder von WikiCommons gibt es einen eigenen Tag, am besten diesen nutzen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons

Happy Mapping
cowboyxup
mavl (2025-10-31 06:04:55+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок меняет статус дороги с service на track. Плохое состояние дороги не меняет статус дороги. Проезд (service) от этого не становится дорогой с другим статусом. track - это именно полевые и лесные дороги. В населённых пунктах эти дороги редкость.
fortera_au (2025-10-31 02:56:16+00:00): Hi, you've accidentally dragged a node that's part of a multipolygon onto Ocean Road, I've fixed this up for you in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174001668
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173957725
Frans S (2025-11-07 09:39:52+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
About hedges. Hedges are not to be connected to paths. Just map them over the full length alongside a path.
You also overlooked dwellings and settlements.
Best regards and keep mapping
Warin61 (2025-10-31 09:31:31+00:00): Hi,
Problem: Relation 2204423 (wetland is no longer closed ... needs ways along the coast?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-01 01:52:23+00:00): Thanks. Am aware of that but need help trying to sort out the various MPs that are tied to each other?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-02 07:06:48+00:00): I think that's now fixed? Could you please check & confirm? (Don't worry about the alignment - that's the next job!)
pepsi_max2k (2025-11-15 07:41:01+00:00): Noticed the changes to Shoal Bay Recycling Centre are inaccurate too - I physically mapped out the trails and borders on foot a year ago and some have now been reverted to incorrect areas. I'll try and put them back from memory as it's only minor stuff.
nevw (2025-10-30 06:39:13+00:00): I deleted this addition of business details to a roadway junction.