piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-28 21:49:29+00:00): Powiedzmy, że odniosę się zbiorczo do tej i innych edycji.

Opisy zmian 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

https://youtu.be/xBMIoypkdI4?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5&t=2596
Po takich opisach po prostu mam ochotę takie edycje odesłać do kosza.
Każdy jakoś zaczyna. Takimi liniami nie pojedziemy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1354997951 proszę się przyjrzeć jak jest narysowana. Tego typu drogi to podjazdy 
highway=service
service=driveway

Ta droga https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/253987170 wygląda na mocniej uczęszczaną i zrobił bym z niej typ higway=service a na pewno na odcinku zabudowań w pobliżu kościoła. Ta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1354996159 to też service. Sprawę rodzaju nawierzchni można załatwić odpowiednimi tagami. Wszystko dostępne w pomocy edytora.

Można sobie też pomóc aplikacjami na telefon
https://play.google.com/store/search?q=streetcomplete&c=apps&hl=pl

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=info.zverev.ilya.every_door&hl=pl

Nie wnikałem na ile rację ma bot który pisał w sprawie adresów ale może warto trochę o nich poczytać.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-28 19:31:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1339552404
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1354998740

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mcliquid (2025-01-28 19:31:19+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Marvin de Hont (2025-01-28 20:50:11+00:00): Hi Mcliquid, Thanks for flagging me. I know what happened. I forgot to upload a small changeset for Pretoria, SA - had diner in between - and started on a challeng for Scotland. So a few buildings in Pretoria were added to the Scotland changeset :( So Stupid! I will be more careful from now on. Thanks again and good evening.
mcliquid (2025-01-28 20:56:02+00:00): Thank you for your answer and explaining your changes! Very appreciated :)
Have a nice evening, too!
Nzau (2025-02-01 22:02:15+00:00): Salut Albert,
J'ai fait quelques modifs, notre but étant de respecter les panneaux de polices sur le terrain, il s'agit donc bien d'une voie verte (panneau C115). Même si elle n'est pas dans les normes, le mieux reste d'ajouter une largueur si besoin.

Dans tous les cas s'il s'agit d'un chemin mixte il vaut mieux utiliser 'path' et joué sur 'designated/yes'

A+
AlbaireN (2025-02-01 23:07:32+00:00): Ça ne me semble pas du tout cohérent avec ton message précédent (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161759790) où il y avait un panneau voie verte mais que tu taggues en track.
Ici, ça reste d'abord un trottoir. D'autant plus que l'usage du panneau de police voie verte est totalement dévoyé et ne représente pas toujours la réalité des aménagements. Ici, c'est juste un trottoir d'à peine 2 mètres où on a mis un jour un panneau voie verte sans faire aucun aménagement supplémentaire.
Je trouve d'ailleurs le diagramme https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Arbre_de_d%C3%A9cision_des_chemins-OpenStreetMap.jpg que l'on trouve sur le wiki très incomplet car si on suit le chemins pour de nombreux "aménagements cyclables" ou plutôt "peintures cyclables". On arrive à "sont conçus pour un seul type d'usager" qui sont les piétons. Et après on a rajouté de la peinture pour autoriser les cyclistes à y rouler mais sans faire d'aménagements supplémentaires (intersections laissés telles quelles, grosses bordures, trottoir non élargi...).
Se référer aux panneaux de police quand les panneaux de police eux-même ne respectent pas les standards en vigueur, ça me pose des questions quand même. Je vais essayer de faire un sujet sur le forum dans la semaine pour voir ce que les personnes en pensent sur tous ces trottoirs cyclables peints et voie verte qui ne sont pas vraiment adaptés à la pratique du vélo...
Nzau (2025-02-01 23:23:16+00:00): Re,
Pour les chemins ruraux, je les mettais aussi en path avant, mais il s'agit d'un chemin carrossable (ce que n'est pas path), d'ou le track. Voir le forum : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/une-piste-cyclable-nest-pas-un-sentier/26366/23

Après pour les pseudos voies vertes je suis d'accord avec toi, elles ne sont pas forcément adapté/aux normes. Mais dans OSM on mappe le terrain, donc s'il y a un panneau voie verte sur le terrain, on le mappe et on met les attributs qui correspondent sur la voirie : il faut utiliser path dès qu'un aménagement est mixte.
Par contre s'il y a des défauts, alors on peux aussi les mapper (bordure, largueur...). 

Et pour info, j'ai laissé path=sidewalk, ce qui correspond bien à un trottoir partagé : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:path=sidewalk 


Il faut utiliser highway=footway uniquement pour des aménagements non mixtes, pareil pour cycleway. Mais dès qu'il y a un aménagement mixte il faut utiliser highway=path
Nzau (2025-02-01 23:27:07+00:00): Et je vois mal comment définir clairement des aménagements qui ne sont "pas vraiment adaptés à la pratique du vélo..."

Cela reste assez subjectif, puisque personne ne pratique de la même façon. Des cyclistes pro te dirons qu'une voie verte de 4m de large n'est pas faite pour la pratique du vélo.

Il y a d'ailleurs eu le cas pour les DSC à un moment, des contributeurs se sont amusés à les mapper alors qu'il n'y avait aucun panneau d'autorisation sur le terrain. Mais encore une fois, seul le terrain prime, donc pas de panneau = pas de DSC. 

Au plaisir d'en discuter ^^
salma_ayman (2025-01-29 12:11:10+00:00): Hello "ABDULLAH AL WERFALLI",
Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap, particularly your recent updates. I noticed that you added new tags, specifically "from" and "to". I would appreciate it if you could provide some insight into the reasoning behind adding these tags.
However, I’d like to bring to your attention that these tags do not appear to align with the OSM Wiki policies for these keys, as outlined in the following links:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:from
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:to
Additionally, I observed a spelling error in the "from" key, which can be seen in this link:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35893854
Please let me know if you have any clarifications regarding these tags.
Thank you for your time and effort!
Best regards,
salma_ayman
Piotr Piotrowski (2025-01-28 22:16:29+00:00): Wg mnie tej drogi tam nie ma, została narysowana po śladzie jakiegoś sprzętu który przejechał przez kiedyś przez pole. Na Stravie widać, że ktoś kiedy przez to pole przejechał zupełnie innym śladem, tutaj zrzut https://ibb.co/PZpBpF4M - ta ciemnoniebieska linia.

Ogólnie to mi wszystko jedno bo i tak tam powstanie niedługo jakieś osiedle czy data center, ale odnoszę wrażenie że czasami te polne ścieżki wrzucane tylko na podstawie zdjęć satelitarnych są dodawane nadgorliwie, bo jednego roku są a drugiego rolnik zaorze pole inaczej i już nie ma - takie moje doświadczenia :)
CurlingMan13 (2025-01-30 02:27:03+00:00): OSM is only for businesses with a physical storefront.  It is not the place for online advertising.  As such, this changeset has been reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161920650
jjyach (2025-01-29 21:26:58+00:00): Hello, this construction wrapped up last month and is completed.  Also when doing this, there is a "construction area" that you can use to tag instead of having your boundary appear as a road.
silversurfer83 (2025-01-28 20:44:40+00:00): Gude :)

guck mal hier
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dentrance
Trifft das die Durchlasse der Stadtmauer vielleicht besser?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161872445
matze089 (2025-01-29 22:23:26+00:00): Ja. Trifft es. Nur wie trage ich es ein?
Marek-M (2025-01-29 07:29:07+00:00): Poprawiłem dodane przez Ciebie wejście na SOR `emergency=emergency_ward_entrance`. Jest to tylko oddział w szpitalu a nie oddzielny szpital (stworzyłeś tutaj duplikat amenity=hospital).

Nie wiem jakie podpowiedzi daje Organic Maps ale dla tego punku była nietrafiona :)
baumann3141 (2025-03-15 01:57:37+00:00): Hello, I am in the process of updating the Trowbridge exit based on available MDOT information. I might be able to get some GPS traces as well.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161872901
thom_bike_bln (2025-02-01 22:35:39+00:00): Hallo mschilde, es gibt hier zwei Möglichkeiten für Radfahrende: Sowohl einen (nicht benutzungspflichtigen) Hochbordradweg, als auch eine Busspur mit Randfreigabe. Bisher war beides kartiert. Durch deine Änderung in cycleway=separate geht die Information zur Busspur verloren. Magst du das rückgängig machen?
thom_bike_bln (2025-02-01 22:36:17+00:00): "Radfreigabe" war gemeint.
mschilde (2025-02-01 22:54:13+00:00): Oh du hast Recht, ich hab das Schild übersehen. Danke für den Hinweis, ich kümmere mich.
mueschel (2025-01-29 08:19:37+00:00): Hi,
Please check the name tags you added. You used the keys 'name-ar' and 'name-en' instead of the correct 'name:ar' and 'name:en'.
Marek-M (2025-01-28 22:06:15+00:00): Cześć, w jakim celu dodajesz tłumaczenie nazw POI? Przecież nie są one widoczne na szyldach. Dodajesz też numery telefonów w niepoprawnej formie i niepełne adresy (najczęściej sam kod pocztowy). Czy Organic Maps wymaga podania tych danych w takiej formie? Poprawiłem ostatnie Twoje edycje w Kościerzynie ale w kolejnych proszę o uwagę i poprawne dodawanie danych, bez tłumaczenia nazw, które jest zbędne.
LloydJ (2025-01-29 07:19:08+00:00): Dzień dobry Panie Marku 

Tłumaczone nazwa POI jest widoczny w Organic Maps jeśli taka ustawienia językowe są. W tym przypadku, to jest 'oficjalne' nazwa a niektóre marketing używa tak.

W app Organic Maps ja zawsze dałem pełne adres, nie tylko kod pocztowy. Może to jest jakiś błąd w app? Będę to zgłosić.

Z numerami telefonów, dziękuję za uwagi. Nie był informacji lub format mask w Organic Maps, ale będę prosić o ten możliwość.
redd (2025-01-28 21:37:54+00:00): Hi Matthias Klein,
vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. 

Der Tag diaper=* ist veraltet und kaum noch genutzt. Statdessen würde ich vorschlagen das gebräuchlichere changing_table=* zu nutzen.

Schöne Grüße,

redd
marc__marc (2026-01-26 12:58:08+00:00): Bonjour,
j'ai annulé la modification car celle-ci met des tags de Tesla sur la station d'Engie Vianeo.
En plus tu as de bon yeux pour voir les ref sur les imageries sat renseignée dans la source :)
Cordialement,
Marc
kadiwa (2025-03-31 11:32:47+00:00): Die Firma war bereits als Node eingetragen. Bitte nicht mehrere Nodes für die gleiche Sache anlegen, sondern stattdessen Informationen zum existierenden Node hinzufügen.
Nakaner (2025-02-14 10:25:11+00:00): Hallo,

die meisten Ks-Signale in Wörth(Rhein) habe ich gerade per Revert löschen müssen, weil sie aus einem Lageplan von InfraGO stammten. Könntest du bitte dein Gedächtnis und deine Fotos mit den übrig gebliebenen OSM-Daten abgleichen? (Oder du packst die Bilder in irgendeinen Cloudspeicher und arbeite sie am Wochenende beim Hackweekend ab)

Viele Grüße

Michael
silversurfer83 (2025-01-29 19:19:19+00:00): Moin :)

in Hessen ist das DOP schon das bessere und aktuellere Bild. Da ist Esri meist ziemlich hinterher (und meist auch nicht ganz so exakt ausgerichtet).

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161873665
matze089 (2025-01-29 21:02:17+00:00): Danke.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161873665
GA_Kevin (2025-02-01 17:20:37+00:00): Thanks for adding these and for helping put #ValdostaOnTheMap!
eggie (2025-01-28 21:51:10+00:00): Beste DvdGiessen,

De juiste procedure is om het oude adres (hier toevallig geen BAGadresnode) leeg te halen van bedrijfsinfo en op het nieuwe adres weer bij te taggen. 
Ik heb je info samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
Hufkratzer (2025-01-30 21:30:01+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1355019550 is not a horse riding center (tag leisure=horse_riding), it is much too small for that; it looks like a round pen and in this case should be tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, see OSM wiki; example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1238641431
IvanBabić (2025-01-29 20:07:03+00:00): Reverted because of wrongly placed split #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161912245
dvdhoven (2025-01-29 06:29:38+00:00): Ik heb deze changeset reverted. 5 busroutes hadden een gat in de route en 2 fietsknooppuntroutes ook.
Tomas09 (2025-01-29 10:04:25+00:00): Oh, het gaf mij een warning voor de busroutes dat ze verandert moesten worden. Niet doen dus.
Tomas09 (2025-01-29 10:05:09+00:00): Ik zou het wel fijn vinden als de rest van mijn changeset wel gebleven was.
jhaluska80 (2025-01-29 01:43:47+00:00): Why did you add a cliff?
Tjuro (2025-05-25 09:23:22+00:00): hello b-unicycling,

I see that you added a burger king here, however there seems to already be a burger king in this building:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/34032899

Is it posible that this was a mistake or are is the location not correct?

greetings,

Tjuro
b-unicycling (2025-05-25 22:22:33+00:00): We went to the one I added; I presume it is a duplicate of the other one, but with  a more correct location. I captured mapillary that day as well: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=9045719722201617 It's blurry, but you can see Burger King roughly where I mapped it.
Mlvln (2025-02-15 12:12:10+00:00): Hallo Tuiui,
was ist die Bedeutung von trail_visibility=yes an der Eislauffläche?
Liebe Grüße
Mlvln
Tuiui (2025-02-15 12:24:00+00:00): Hi  Mlvln,
es ist mir vollkommen unerklärlich wie der Tag da reingerutscht ist - habs entfernt. Danke für den Hinweis!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-02 02:50:17+00:00): Hello. 
Changeset Comments are supposed to inform other Mappers of what you have done, which your continued use of "NULL" doesn't do. Could you please look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments, and improve your comments in future.
crushtheserpent (2025-01-28 22:28:16+00:00): Based on survey and aerial imagery
NeisBot (2025-01-28 22:44:38+00:00): Hi Tonyfarms, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 83% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 natural(s)
- 42 waterway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=161876287
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-29 06:42:32+00:00): Thanks for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional.

However, you removed again ways and paths wich are visible in the satellite imagery.

If you want to revise this area, please do not start by deleting elements. It is good practice to improve existing objects instead of removing them.

Thanks!
Taya_S (2025-01-31 05:52:20+00:00): Full or partial revert of changesets: 161879313, 161879010, 161876287

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161964442
Taya_S (2025-01-31 06:02:38+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17182
Jrachi (2025-01-29 12:03:23+00:00): Ciao.
Tre note:
1) È veramente necessario creare una relazione per un percorso così breve?
20 metri significa che vedi facilmente dove andare a occhio, se non c'è nebbia fitta fitta.
Inoltre vedo che a 30 metri c'è un altro bivio con segnaletica.
2) distance richiede l'uso del punto come separatore delle unità e l'unità è il metro
correggendo:
distance = 20
2a) (personalmente trovo stupido indicare la distanza su un database cartografico)
3) il from e tu sono numerati?
O è solo una tua idea?
Se è proprio necessaria la relazione, io metterei from=Bivio  814 -814A e to=Bivio 814 -814A
3a) Hai scritto "Biovio" ^:)
Jrachi (2025-01-29 12:09:41+00:00): Scusa.
width e lenght sono in metri, distance è in chilometri!
distance= 0.02
Sono 20 metri!
Ti avevo suggerito di mettere 20 chilometri!
Jrachi (2025-01-29 12:34:40+00:00): Anche qui da correggere distance
felipeeugenio (2025-01-29 11:25:51+00:00): se eliminan objetos inexistentes
felipeeugenio (2025-01-29 11:25:06+00:00): se eliminan objetos inexistentes
Kovoschiz (2025-01-29 08:29:10+00:00): The `highway=` and `place=` should be separated in this case. The `=fountain` is still part of the `=square` , only that it's no walkable.
NeisBot (2025-01-29 06:44:17+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck #NeisLab
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-01-29 09:03:08+00:00): vandalism reverted in

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161888209
NeisBot (2025-01-29 06:44:29+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck #NeisLab
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-01-29 09:03:09+00:00): vandalism reverted in

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161888209
JakovBušić (2025-02-07 16:34:42+00:00): I revert it because accidental node was created #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162252252
somehundred (2025-01-29 00:57:42+00:00): Kuros gadījumos tad "name" būtu jāizmanto?
HellMap (2025-01-29 10:41:15+00:00): Tad, kad šie nosaukumi reāli pastāv un ir pārbaudāmi nevis vienkārši apraksta, kā to telpu lieto.[1] Ja būtu, piemēram "Lielā Zāle".[2]

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

[2] https://www.vefkp.lv/telpas/liela-zale/
somehundred (2025-01-29 11:06:25+00:00): Tātad arī šeit [1] ir nepareizi?

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-54.179780/-36.711030
HellMap (2025-01-29 11:34:40+00:00): Visticamāk, jā. Neeksistējošu nosaukumu likšana renderēšanai ir viena no OSM biežākajām (mazajām) problēmām. 90% gadījumu tie ir vienkārši aprakstoši, jo kartētāji neņem vērā `name` objektīvu nozīmi datubāzē, bet tikai vizualizāciju, kuras interpretācijai nepieciešams konteksts. Arguments parasti ir "bet tas taču netraucē" un "kartē noder skatīties" un "citādi kartē nevar atšķirt". Bet dati pēc tam pilni ar visādiem "veikals" un "trepes" un "tornis" un vēsturiskiem nosaukumiem un reālu nosaukumu meklēšana kļūst sarežģīta. Bet faktiskā problēma ir kartes renderēšanas nepilnības, nevis datos, kā jau tas ir daudziem tegiem un elementiem.

"Nepareizus" piemērus tev problēmas atrast nebūs, Latvijā tādu miljons un daudz kur pat pateikt grūti, vai tas tiešām būtu nepareizi (jo pareizākas birkas starp `name` un `description` arī gluži nav, piemēram [1]). Un katru es arī personīgi nelaboju, tikai uzkrītošākus gadījumus, kā šeit, kur es jau kaut ko citu reizē rediģēju. Un nosaukumi ir viena no tām lietām, kur labot masveidā var visu dienu un pa to laiku citi saliks tik pat daudz jaunus un pusei izmaiņu būs klāt "kāpēc nosaukums nodzēsts?"... 😉

[1] https://osm.org/go/0P37YqW0X
NeisBot (2025-02-06 10:34:34+00:00): Hi Jbensman, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over the last days and weeks, you've made at least 25 with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Jbensman (2025-02-06 14:01:54+00:00): Sorry, it seemed really obvious to me.  It is a lowhead dam.  While you can hear it a ways ahead, you cannot see it until you are almost on top of it.  If you go over it, you will be caught in hydraulics and most likely drown.  There are no trespassing signs on the other side of the river, so this is where you must portage your kayak around the dam.  There are no markings or signs in the river warning you, so this is an extremely dangerous place.
_Madfly (2025-02-08 11:56:58+00:00): Hi, why have you changed this road to be two separate ways? The road is not a dual carriageway so it should not be mapped like this.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway#:~:text=Roads%20are%20not,barrier%20to%20vehicles.
spiregrain (2025-01-29 08:43:37+00:00): Hi there.  I've made a further change (changeset 161887591) here to :  1. merge in the separate point for "Atelier Point" into the building.  2. add building:part objects to set the different heights of the different parts of the building.  3. replaced the 'layer' tags with building:level and building:min_level tags.   ...  There is probably room for more refinement, including puting on all the entrances and figuring out how entrance to E Rosa house works since it's apparently mostly starting on level 2.   I'll try to get over there tomorrow to have a look.
watmildon (2025-02-03 20:44:38+00:00): Thanks for working on waterways! One thing to keep an eye out for is to make sure the side streams are all flowing downstream. 

This one was pointed the wrong way but I've updated it. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1355059795/history#map=19/38.423370/-91.043371

There's a really neat QA layer you may find helpful/interesting. https://waterwaymap.org/loops/

Anyhow... keep it up!
Jbensman (2025-03-02 20:15:33+00:00): I try to make sure I have that right.  I have been adding lots of hydrology lately.  I will add it in JOSM and then edit it in the regular editor.  I go through and make sure it is flowing in the right direction and then get an error message that says it is flowing against another segment.  But everything is correct.  Doesn't happen much, but it drives me crazy when it does.  Any suggestions?
watmildon (2025-03-02 21:28:18+00:00): I don’t have any surefire ways to keep these from happening (especially in complicated cases) but the loop map has basically zero false positives so I check it from time to time. We have the US pretty clean so it’s not too hard to keep things neat. 

But I like mentioning it to folks just in case. Overall great work though!
nevw (2025-01-29 11:33:06+00:00): …needs more improvement
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.28643&lat=-37.79724&zoom=18
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 01:38:17+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165050874
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-01-29 16:43:41+00:00): Can you explain what you are trying to update here? I will have to revert this changeset because it makes no sense.
Artist JAYE | GUITAR LESSONS 1-to-1 Online | For All levels - Worldwide (2025-01-29 19:32:15+00:00): No need to revert anything.  Would have been considerate of you to receive my answer prior to reverting.
I simply had trouble with the loading of the map, and in inputing the necessary information.  All was corrected perfectly, and now it seems you've tampered with it again.  after many hours of trying to fix it on my end, which i had succeeded in doing.