piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2025-05-30 14:47:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Svp geen gebouwen uitlijnen op grond van schuin genomen  luchtfotio's. Ik zet de schuur weer terug. Het lijkt fout, maar je kijkt naar het dak. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-05-30 14:55:27+00:00): Op de Koolhovelaan teken je voetpaden op voetpaden. Dat noemen we duplicated ways en die routeren niet goed.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-30 14:51:57+00:00): Dag IJansenW

Langsliggende trottoirs routeren niet goud. Wel als er groenstroken tussen de rijbaan en het trottoir ligt.
Er is geen consensus om die trottoirs wel of niet in te tekenen.
Veel mappers nemen de tag sidewalk=left right of both op in de tagging van de hoofdrijbaan.
MVG
eggie
catgirlseraid (2025-05-30 14:18:56+00:00): sources for this changeset since i forgot to add them sorry, Esri World Imagery, Esri World Imagery Clarity, Bing Imagery, NYS Orthos Online, Wikimedia images, 1960's US Department of Engineers map, Mapillary
eggie (2025-05-30 15:05:24+00:00): Welkom bij OSM..  
Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. 
De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode.

MVG
eggie
AurélienQ (2025-05-30 17:16:54+00:00): I'm not shure you're doing a good thing. Firstly OSM is not a place for temporary things (as a military zone her only for a month). Then I'm really curious to know from where come the name.

Did you discuss about you're modifications on a forum ?
CreCrePL (2025-05-30 17:47:02+00:00): It's not temporary - untill they have a chance to even remove some of the stone it will take long time. 

I'm trying to do the same like in Brienz GR - it's also inaccessible to the public, no?
AurélienQ (2025-05-30 17:58:56+00:00): But is that really a military zone ? Or did you just tagged it like that because there are some troops in there ?
Strubbl (2025-05-30 21:22:21+00:00): @CreCrePL please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4780277
imagico (2025-06-01 09:44:19+00:00): Wenn das hier gemappte tatsächlich entspreched Tagging ein militärisches Sperrgebiet ist, dann wäre eine Angabe der Quelle für die Ausdehnung wichtig - es gibt dazu dann lokal sicher öffentliche Verlautbarungen, aus denen das hervor geht.

Falls das nicht der Fall its, handelt es sich um Tagging für den Renderer.  Das kann man schon so machen, aber dann sollte man das mit entsprechenden Anmerkungen in den Daten auch so erkenntlich machen und klar sagen: Wir malen hier im Moment eine Karte und die Semantik der Daten ist dabei nicht von Bedeutung.
AurélienQ (2025-06-01 11:03:22+00:00): I disagree, you shouldn't map for rendering. That's one of the core principles of OSM. We map the data, making it easily reusable, and other people use that data to make a map.
Fjellrev (2025-06-01 12:12:43+00:00): Da es sich um kein militärisches Sperrgebiet handelt habe ich landuse=military und military=danger_area entfernt, diese sind nur Mapping für den Renderer, access=no sagt genug aus.
Zum genauen, und besonders aktuellen, Verlauf der Grenze der Sperrzone kann ich nichts sagen deswegen passe ich da auch nichts an.
ivanbranco (2025-06-13 13:32:54+00:00): Hi Reino,

why did you change the diameter from 4840 to 48.4? The wiki says: "If no unit is given millimetres are assumed", and the correct value in millimetres is 4840
Reino Baptista (2025-06-13 15:30:44+00:00): Hi,

Wow! I just read the wiki... I didn't expect that.
Sorry. I already putted it back.

RB

PS: Don't you want to add "mm"
"...Because of this unfortunate inconsistency, it can avoid misunderstandings to explicitly specify the unit in the value, such as diameter=150 mm." in wiki
Supaplex (2025-05-31 09:57:06+00:00): Hi 

It seems you are adding buildings that do not match the satellite. Please be aware that tasking manager tasks are serious, don't graffiti.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167004842
ceirios (2025-08-10 16:01:01+00:00): Hi there AAB2024,

Sorry to comment 2 months later, but please don't add "Unnamed Road" to the addr:street tag. If the street is not named, then the field should be left blank, otherwise you're adding false data.

Diolch,
Ceirios
CurlingMan13 (2025-11-06 06:22:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1390972329

That's an interesting name.
hNdrX_ (2025-05-30 20:55:25+00:00): looks good - any other information you could add? website, opening hours?
marc__marc (2026-02-19 21:13:30+00:00): c'est étrange car tu as crées plusieurs stations dans la ville qui ont toutes les mêmes ref, ce qui n'est évidement pas possible (et encore moins visible sur le cadastre ou l'ortho)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178793099
Cordialement,
Marc
gymate (2025-05-30 19:52:42+00:00): Changeset tags that I left out (sorry!):

import:tool:url=https://github.com/KAMI911/osm_poi_matchmaker
import:tool:version=0.8.0
import:tool=osm_poi_matchmaker
import:area=hungary
mechanical=yes
is_in:country_code=HU
is_in:country=Hungary
import:discussion:url=https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2018-July/005591.html
gymate (2025-05-30 19:53:13+00:00): Changeset tags that I left out (sorry!):

import:tool:url=https://github.com/KAMI911/osm_poi_matchmaker
import:tool:version=0.8.0
import:tool=osm_poi_matchmaker
import:area=hungary
mechanical=yes
is_in:country_code=HU
is_in:country=Hungary
import:discussion:url=https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2018-July/005591.html
Norbert Dichter (2025-05-30 17:19:05+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166978166
Supaplex (2025-05-31 09:57:07+00:00): Hi 

It seems you are adding buildings that do not match the satellite. Please be aware that tasking manager tasks are serious, don't graffiti.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167004842
Feidianbo (2025-05-30 15:40:05+00:00): 待更新楼栋号标识
gymate (2025-05-30 19:53:18+00:00): Changeset tags that I left out (sorry!):

import:tool:url=https://github.com/KAMI911/osm_poi_matchmaker
import:tool:version=0.8.0
import:tool=osm_poi_matchmaker
import:area=hungary
mechanical=yes
is_in:country_code=HU
is_in:country=Hungary
import:discussion:url=https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2018-July/005591.html
abdul_4ts (2025-05-30 21:02:37+00:00): Hello Wealth192, thanks for mapping.
Please ensure that you tag all buildings you create. Without the "building=yes" tag, your mapping won't contribute more meaningful information. Keep mapping and tagging :)
gymate (2025-05-30 19:53:20+00:00): Changeset tags that I left out (sorry!):

import:tool:url=https://github.com/KAMI911/osm_poi_matchmaker
import:tool:version=0.8.0
import:tool=osm_poi_matchmaker
import:area=hungary
mechanical=yes
is_in:country_code=HU
is_in:country=Hungary
import:discussion:url=https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2018-July/005591.html
vasony (2025-05-31 20:08:52+00:00): kellene majd a ref is
gymate (2025-05-31 20:42:01+00:00): Köszi, nem is vettem észre! Nyitottam rá issue-t: https://github.com/KAMI911/osm_poi_matchmaker/issues/139
vasony (2025-05-31 21:02:17+00:00): Semmi gond, már egy ideje jelzem, csak eddig nem készült el.
gymate (2025-05-30 19:53:23+00:00): Changeset tags that I left out (sorry!):

import:tool:url=https://github.com/KAMI911/osm_poi_matchmaker
import:tool:version=0.8.0
import:tool=osm_poi_matchmaker
import:area=hungary
mechanical=yes
is_in:country_code=HU
is_in:country=Hungary
import:discussion:url=https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2018-July/005591.html
gymate (2025-05-30 19:53:26+00:00): Changeset tags that I left out (sorry!):

import:tool:url=https://github.com/KAMI911/osm_poi_matchmaker
import:tool:version=0.8.0
import:tool=osm_poi_matchmaker
import:area=hungary
mechanical=yes
is_in:country_code=HU
is_in:country=Hungary
import:discussion:url=https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2018-July/005591.html
literan (2025-05-31 11:03:29+00:00): не надо писать все подряд в поле "name". Все равно откатим
gurglypipe (2025-05-30 16:08:54+00:00): Nice work :)
amcclements (2025-05-30 17:25:40+00:00): Ooh thanks, I'm just pottering along trying to fill in local gaps. I grew up in Hornby, now live in Gressingham, so it's quite familiar and I can easily do mini-surveys.
There's some farm tracks here which cross the footpath and generate warnings, but I'm not too bothered.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166979768
Udarian (2025-05-30 20:54:22+00:00): on the the latest street side imagery I don't see any path there, there are stairs but I doubt that a gulf cart can traverse that.
eggie (2025-05-30 17:07:21+00:00): Hi Pablo,

Your comment was - ?
That is not clear to other mappers. 
What was your edit?

Greetz,
eggie
A67-A67 (2025-05-30 17:24:18+00:00): It seems the description 'lightrailhalte van Den Haag Centraal' was changed to 'Tramhalte van Den Haag Centraal', which is ambigious, because there is also a tram stop outside.
eggie (2025-05-30 17:43:43+00:00): Reverted for now by changeset #166983897

Asked Public Transport mapper to have a further look by mappers edits.
Greetz,
eggie
InsertUser (2025-05-30 21:17:37+00:00): It also seems to have duplicated the Bermuda Triangle?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11845908616
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-05-31 14:42:21+00:00): I can add the node and boundary to a relation.
Patr1k_P (2025-06-12 11:09:21+00:00): zdravim, uz viackrat som po vas opravoval zmazanu budovu s adresou...treba si davat pozor ked mazete budovu, tak sledovat na lavej strane znacky...ale okrem toho aj tak nie je spravny postup ze zmazete budovu a nakreslite novu, mali by ste skor zachovavat historiu objektov a v tomto pripade ste mali povodnu budovu len opravit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80087322/history
Ján Lucik (2025-06-12 11:48:11+00:00): OK. Beriem na vedomie. A budem postupovať podľa vašich odporúčaní.
wolfgang8 (2025-05-31 06:14:38+00:00): Ich vermute, die eingetragenen maxspeed=50 sind nicht extra ausgeschildert, sondern normale Ortsbeschränkungen. Dafür wäre maxspeed:type=AT:urban der passende Wert.

siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:type#Austria
DerKaiserschmarren (2025-05-31 08:16:31+00:00): Da habe ich anscheinend zu Flott gearbeitet ;)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167001070
gefixt!
wolfgang8 (2025-05-31 13:23:10+00:00): Danke! Ein paar sind mir noch aufgefallen - ebenfalls gefixt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167011984
DerKaiserschmarren (2025-06-02 09:51:00+00:00): Danke danke :)
Udarian (2025-05-30 21:18:59+00:00): on the latest imagery this area is under construction, has that completed or not. and looking further into the "Key Biscayne Shoreline" park this seems to be a proposal more then anything, and certainly does not seem like a features that exists at the moment. so why did you add this, what is your source, is this just something you saw on the news or is it actually there.
Udarian (2025-08-02 08:31:47+00:00): please respond
eggie (2025-05-30 17:19:19+00:00): Hi  Pablo..

The busstop was changed into disused:public_transport=platform
So this is not an actual busstop but the is a reason to tag it this way. 
So better not remove these disused objects. 
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2025-05-30 17:22:05+00:00): reverted for now by changeset Wijzigingenset #166983145.. I will ask the public transport mappers.
Greetz,
eggie
Leo Slager (2025-05-30 21:20:57+00:00): disused:public_transport=platform
is hier de correcte tagging.
DwarfNebula_ (2025-05-30 20:27:32+00:00): Hey Eggie,

Ik zie dat jij en Leo deze terug hebben gezet. Ik snap de tag disused als er nog een halte bordje zou staan. Echter is er niets meer over dan een rijtje tegels. Lijkt mij niet nodig om dan taggen toch? Anders heb ik op andere plekken in Utrecht ook onterecht bushaltes weggehaald (langere tijd geleden)....
eggie (2025-05-30 20:39:05+00:00): Nou .. ik heb een aantal teruggedraaid, omdat mapper niet reageert en zijn bijdragen niet veel vertrouwen geven.

Het zou best kunnen dat deze bushaltes niet meer terugkomen.
... vandaar dat ik aan Leo heb gevraagd om even te kijken.
Mapper is een randommapper die met z'n edits van Spanje to Nederland mapt.. soms in één upload.
Er werden ook door een andere validator vragen gesteld, maar er komen geen antwoorden.
Die bushaltes die op disused staan hadden te maken met de routes die tijdelijk waren opgeheven.
Ik acht even het antwoord van Leo af. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-30 21:29:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166982865#map=18/52.082791/5.155986&layers=N
DwarfNebula_ (2025-05-31 07:27:41+00:00): Leo heeft ze aangepast naar disused: nadat ik ze al had verwijderd. Maar als jij al contact met hem hebt wacht ik dat wel even af.
eggie (2025-05-31 08:00:04+00:00): Hoi.. Het betrof hier een mapper die op meer plaatsen zaken verwijderde.
Dat is gewoon teruggezet. Het waren volgens mij geen edits van jou.
Ik laat het verder aan de O V mappers.

Groet..
eggie
eggie (2025-05-31 08:01:25+00:00): Je zou Leo nog even kunnen vragen. Hij weet van de hoed en de rand.
eggie (2025-05-30 17:31:19+00:00): Please don't place shops etc outside the buildings.
You interpretation from the  aerial imagery is wrong.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2025-05-30 17:33:28+00:00): An aerial imagery are not taken perpendicular.
MikeN (2025-05-30 17:32:16+00:00): Also removed nonexistent TIGER import roads
LucasFUB (2025-06-12 13:42:14+00:00): Bonjour, attention à ne pas oublier la circulation des véhicules autorisés. Ici le Quai Schoepflin est autorisé aux véhicules dans un sens et uniquement aux vélos dans l'autre (vers pont du Faubourg de Pierre). De manière générale, attention à l'attribut "designated" qui signifie "dédié/fait pour". motor_vehicle=designated signifie donc que la voie est pour les voitures alors que c'est justement l'inverse. Pour les véhicules des riverains c'est "destination" qu'il faut utiliser.
environ314 (2025-06-12 15:50:15+00:00): ok, merci pour les efforts de pédagogie !
le "motor_vehicule:destination" correspond donc bien à "passage interdit, sauf véhicules autorisés" ?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-30 17:51:01+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231380318

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Nekoatthegates (2025-06-03 20:15:33+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Mapillary.
mstrbrid (2025-07-30 16:49:56+00:00): Hi, any chance that you know enough of the transit hub changes at airport to reroute the bus relations? Currently this (presumably temporary?) footway is breaking the bus routes: thttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1391007287
Sofia_111 (2025-07-30 16:53:55+00:00): The bus route doesn't go down this road anymore.
mstrbrid (2025-07-30 16:57:26+00:00): Yes, that's what I gather. Are you able to correct it?
Sofia_111 (2025-07-30 17:00:49+00:00): Probably.. I've never changed bus routes on OSM before though.. I'll have a look later.
eggie (2025-05-30 18:49:53+00:00): Dag aaaaas,
Wanneer een kerk sluit krijgt het gebouw dan opeens een andere naam?

MVG
eggie
aaaaaaas (2025-05-30 20:47:18+00:00): Deze kerk zou door een stichting Naoberkark Meddo geëxploiteerd worden, en heeft zo deze naam gekregen. De stichting is echter opgeheven en de naam wordt niet meer gebruikt.
eggie (2025-05-30 20:53:43+00:00): Oke... duidelijk.
Groet..
eggie
Nekoatthegates (2025-06-03 20:15:24+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Mapillary.
martien-176 (2025-06-15 18:50:53+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. 

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Most buildings do have right angled corners and we need our mapping to reflect that. Accurate building footprints are important because building sizes are often used to estimate population sizes for an area to conduct humanitarian activities. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. 

Please check out these sources for more info: 
- Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
- Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ 
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT global validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166984995
citrula (2025-05-30 21:07:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. On OSM, we try to make only one object for each feature ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element )

I cleaned this up a bit to try to clarify where the actual venue is. In a day or so, you can use the routing tool on this website to test and make sure it routes people as expected.
coteyka (2025-05-30 18:25:37+00:00): Предупреждения о не каноничном бренде должны пропасть, когда организации переименуют в Name Suggestion Index. Создал issue на гитхабе: https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/issues/11003
cronoser (2026-03-13 13:02:09+00:00): corregidas etiquetas
rempshaener (2025-05-30 19:05:19+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Du hast dir ein schwieriges Thema ausgesucht, die organisatorische Abbildung von Feuerwehrstrukturen. Das Problem ist: Dafür gibt es kein Schema.
Daher ist diese Wache hier auch etwas „verbastelt“.

Zur Struktur:
Ein guter Ansatz ist das amenity=fire_station am Gelände, siehe www.openstreetmap.org/way/1189612134, mit name=Feuerwache 1.
Daran gehört ein Teil der Daten (insbesondere die Adresse), die derzeit am Gebäude (www.openstreetmap.org/way/156472981) hinterlegt sind. Da dort auch name=Feuerwache 1 gepflegt ist, handelt es sich um die erste Dublette.
Die zweite Dublette ist die Einheit der freiwilligen Feuerwehr, die du in www.openstreetmap.org/node/12875833495 angelegt hast. Dort wird das amenity=fire_station und die Adresse gedoppelt.
Problematisch ist, dass es sich bei amenity=fire_station um EINE Feuerwache handelt; die Unterscheidung Hauptamt/freiwillig, mehrere freiwillige Einheiten etc. ist nicht vorgesehen, da es sich ja immer noch um eine Feuerwache handelt. Das kann man nur über – etwas unschön – alternative Namen, ref etc. abbilden, siehe z. B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198195259.

Mein Vorschlag wäre daher, dass du deinen Node wieder löschst und – falls du es dir zutraust – auch die übrige Struktur überarbeitest.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
eggie (2025-05-31 05:28:43+00:00): Dag Leo..
Tip.. 
Aan die parkeerstroken langs de weg kun je meestal toevoegen parking=street_side orientation=perpendicular of diagonal.
Het zijn geen parkeerterreinen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-31 05:29:22+00:00): Er zat ook een loosstukje lijn als amenity=parking. Ik heb het verwijderd.
vectorial8192 (2025-07-26 13:39:55+00:00): It seems this changeset caused some parts of Tsing Sha Highway to become `highway=motorway_link`, which seems like a mistake.

As of writing these mistakes should be mostly fixed.
Kovoschiz (2025-07-27 09:38:58+00:00): No, this was intentional before as proposed and adopted by others, for the `=motorway` extent problem https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/835665898/history/1
silversurfer83 (2025-05-30 19:13:04+00:00): Hi there :)

there is one very important thing I wish to bring to your attention:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Please do not misuse the "name" as a description. I just checked a couple of your older changes and they are filled with objects incorrectly named.

Please don't do that.

Also: please watch out where you connect ways with other objects. They only need connections with other ways, barriers and sometimes waterways (only if there is a ford)

please consult the wiki frequently and if in doubt, join a chatgroup. There's groups on Signal, matrix, telegram, discord and the forum  a c.osm.org

safe travels
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166986053
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-18 17:31:20+00:00): are you sure that paths where you set name=cruising are actually having such name?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-18 17:31:48+00:00): also, are you sure that cyclists are banned there?
Norbert Dichter (2025-05-30 19:10:55+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166986208
Gregory Peony (2025-06-03 05:37:45+00:00): Valid deletion of significantly oversized building footprins and mapping more accurate ones. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166986253
Gregory Peony (2025-06-03 05:34:17+00:00): A valid deletion of a significantly oversized footprint. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166986336
habi (2026-01-19 17:48:14+00:00): Ciao Hans
Hier hast du https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1391019761 als Gebäude im Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1329719837 drin erfasst. 
Aus meiner Sicht ist das datentechnisch falsch.
Ich würde das 12-stöckige Ding als `building:part` im äusseren Gebäude erfassen.
Gruss aus Bern,
Habi

PS: Ich bin hier wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5131008
bxl-forever_repair (2025-05-31 08:31:13+00:00): Thanks for this.

There is already a suitable tag for locomotives here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dlocomotive

It is better to use this tag and just use Santa Rita as the name without "locomotora histórica" which is a description.

Don’t worry, we fixed it.
Thosewhoknow (2025-06-12 14:07:08+00:00): Congrats. You got Nigel Farage's attention with this one.
Takuto (2025-06-16 18:43:32+00:00): Пожалуйста, будьте внимательны - вы всем зданиям в этом районе проставили roof:colour = gray, roof:shape=pyramidal, когда это явно не соответствует действительности. Я так понимаю, просто был настроен пресет для инструмента зданий? 
Удаляю все тэги цвета и формы в этом районе.