piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2024-06-03 11:43:54+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please learn how to identify and use the highway tags.
And, solve the issues shown by the issue triangle before uploading your mappings.
You tagged here a piece of rural road as a major highway.
Please consult this wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways
Best regards
galen8183 (2024-06-01 04:28:47+00:00): Requested a review in case I broke any bus routes!
flohoff (2024-06-01 10:39:21+00:00): Moin,
dein changeset hier hatte deutliche Routing änderungen zur Folge.

Durch das lanes=1 ist die Dorfstraße deutlich "schlechter" im routing geworden.

Das lanes=1 ist meiner meinung nach übrigens eher falsch - da gehört lane_markings=no drauf - nicht lanes=1 

Denn Autos passen ja aneinander vorbei, nur existiert keine fahrbahnmarkierung.

Aber hier die die Routingänderungen - Jeweils rot alt - grün neu


https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=629976,778483#52.20035,7.26668,15z

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=628120,778485#52.20871,7.24488,14z

So long

Flo
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-21 07:38:14+00:00): Hello!

You used
surface=niet-bestraat2
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288572968/history

Have you maybe meant
surface=unpaved
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Timmy_Tesseract (2024-07-06 08:13:48+00:00): Good day again. Not sure why you are sorry, but please only use the description tag for information that is relevant for the end map user.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description

And please add more meaningful changeset comments to your edits. Try to describe what you're detailing and connecting (e.g. "connect roads, add surface details").

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Filip009 (2024-06-01 06:15:39+00:00): Zdravím, cestu stačilo len posunúť, nebolo nutné ju vymazať a nakresliť znova. Pokiaľ máte na to iný názor prosím napíšte ho pod tento komentár a následne stlačte tlačidlo "Okomentovať".
John Kastner (2024-09-30 00:14:29+00:00): Related to your other changeset I commented on, is this an actual signed regulation, or your opinion on how best to use the road? If the former, you should use `bicycle=use_sidepath`. Otherwise you'll need to remove this tagging entirely.
❤️‍🔥 (2024-06-02 07:08:04+00:00): Hi, unfortunately NZ Post data is copyrighted so we can't add this information to OSM...
CoderThomas (2024-06-03 07:15:55+00:00): Thanks for messaging me, I won't add any more post codes using NZ Post data. Have my previous edits been reverted, or do I have to do that manually?
❤️‍🔥 (2024-06-03 09:28:53+00:00): I've just done the revert - btw you can still add postcodes that you know from your own experience. E.g. I know that the whole of Tekapo is 7999

Or if you know that one paticular street has the same postcode, then it's still worth mapping, because many geocoders are smart enough to infer the postcode from nearby addresses/shops/schools etc. 

For example these search results have a postcode, even though the address node does not: https://osm.org/search?query=11+karamu+st,+akl
szydzio (2025-05-06 07:07:57+00:00): A co to za atrakcja ? Jakieś mini-zoo ?
Andrzej_Wa (2025-05-06 08:35:27+00:00): Punkt Zwierzyniec usunąłem, bo będąc tam ponownie stwierdziłem, że obiekt jest zamknięty, nie jest udostępniony dla turystów, więc nie jest atrakcją turystyczną. Miałem to zrobić wcześniej, ale jakoś uleciało. Dzięki za komentarz, przypomniał mi co miałem zrobić.
szydzio (2025-05-06 14:08:04+00:00): Super, dzięki za ogarnięcie!
KiloThree (2024-06-01 07:28:46+00:00): I rode along this road today, and I'm confused how the sidewalk could be considered a cycleway under the tagging standards for both
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152106074
KiloThree (2024-06-01 07:55:09+00:00): Also, would you be able to link to any info about the Neoponset River Greenway between Tenean and Morrissey? I didn't think that was supposed to be done till 2025, and haven't been able to find any updates about it
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-01 06:10:14+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288588498
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288588499

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-06-02 03:02:01+00:00): Hello Yudha Adjie, Your edit made damage to the four relations 10028905, 
10028906, 15930602, 17140553 by removing their "via" members. Please revert it.
aceman444 (2024-08-30 17:09:23+00:00): I have seen tactile paving at crossing at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4318560646 .
Yitzchak M (2024-06-01 08:26:11+00:00): Hi Zeev,
I was there yesterday trying to hike on the Golani Trail from north to south and all of a sudden the trail stopped and disappeared. I had to cut through thorns and bushes for a kilometer to get down to the main road. It tore up my leg. Did I truly miss the continuation of the jeep track?
zstadler (2024-06-01 08:38:41+00:00): Looking at the aerial imagery, it looks so. If the dirt road has not been used recently, it may be hard to see from the ground. Also note that this is a grade4 trail.

You may want to look at the trail using Mapbox Satellite - the source listed in this changeset
Yitzchak M (2024-06-01 12:12:55+00:00): Wow! Mapbox does seem to have better clarity than Bing! 
I accept that although from my angle the trail seemed not to exist, that in fact, a little beyond what I could see there was a jeep road. Thank you for that lesson. 
As far as it being grade 4, it was I who gave it the grade 4 due to the quantity and quality of "overgrown".
Yitzchak M (2024-06-07 12:13:00+00:00): Hi Zeev. I went back there this morning, but this time came from the opposite way, from south to north, and I am pleased to announce that I had no trouble following this track. You made a good catch.
bison166 (2024-06-01 07:46:04+00:00): moin tof99, seit wann ist die Kirchstraße asphaltiert ?
tof99 (2024-06-01 08:13:31+00:00): Hallo Bison166, hast recht, das ging beim Brötchenholen zu schnell. StreetComplete hat gefragt, aber der Standort war dann doch einige hundert Meter weiter. Mache ich wieder rückgängig. Danke fürs Aufpassen!
aceman444 (2024-06-17 05:52:52+00:00): Please pay more attention to what you add. The building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183450896 ha 4 levels and 1 roof level, not 3+0.

And the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183450369 seems to have 1 roof level (there are windows in tehe gabled roof).
mziehm (2024-06-01 06:55:59+00:00): Unshure this was a good idea, and I don't know how to easily revert. Sorry
Frans S (2024-06-01 10:05:48+00:00): Thanks for mapping.
A request.
tag highways, only giving access to a single building or buisiness as a service highway,
Traces leading only to farmland or woodland should be tagged as track. Not as unclassified. 
Please consult the highway wiki.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway

Best regards
Best regards
Tsu-Yi Su (2024-06-03 05:32:21+00:00): Noted, thank you very much for the reminder!

Best Regards,
Tsu-Yi
aharvey (2024-08-21 09:46:54+00:00): Is this not serviced by https://www.boathouseferryco.com.au/timetable?
❤️‍🔥 (2024-08-21 21:24:15+00:00): based on that timetable it seems like they only operate between Patonga and Palm Beach, which I haven't changed

The section I removed was https://osm.org/way/255733718 , there's nothing but water taxis here right?
aharvey (2024-08-22 00:09:18+00:00): You also removed the ferry route from the way to Palm Beach https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/247939475 since then TfNSW have re-added it, but now the two tags conflict, so I'll remove the intermittent:route=ferry tag you added based. I agree that I believe Brooklyn to Patonga is water taxi only.
❤️‍🔥 (2024-08-22 12:04:48+00:00): oops, sorry about that, thanks for sorting it out...
Langlaeufer (2024-11-12 10:58:33+00:00): Hallo wiebketru,
hast du dich hier verklickt oder kann man in der Bäckerei wirklich nicht mit Bargeld bezahlen? Wenn ja, womit dann?
wiebketru (2024-11-12 11:58:07+00:00): Die Kette stellt gerade nach und nach auf bargeldlos um: https://www.goeing.de/2024/03/14/bargeldlose-filialen/
Man zahlt also mit Karte.
Langlaeufer (2024-11-12 12:50:25+00:00): ah danke, geb ich dan mal weiter an die notitz
Langlaeufer (2024-11-12 12:51:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152108685#map=19/52.383951/9.747140&layers=N
silversurfer83 (2024-06-01 09:13:01+00:00): Hi Kersti :)

wäre cool, wenn du allgemein, und bei solchen Angaben besonders, bitte eine Quelle angeben könntest. Danke

Alles Gute
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152108743
Lezurex (2024-06-01 08:56:52+00:00): Hallo Maper8957,

Bitte beschränke deine Änderungen in einem Changeset auf ein kleineres Gebiet. Sprich: Ein Changeset für deine Änderungen in Spreitenbach und ein separates Changeset für deine Änderungen in Eggenburg. Danke.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:%C3%84nderungssatz#R%C3%A4umliche_Ausdehnung_von_%C3%84nderungss%C3%A4tzen

LG Lezurex
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-01 07:46:41+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 152005125.
Honey Fombuena (2024-06-06 15:08:10+00:00): Hi Sawan! I'd like to confirm if Global Trading is both a restaurant and a trade shop. If not, then please correct them accordingly. Thank you for your contributions!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152108915
❤️‍🔥 (2024-06-02 07:05:30+00:00): Hi, what source did you use for this edit? This business has no address on their website, and this seems to be a private residential home. Are you sure that this information is meant to be public?
MarinoBM (2024-06-01 21:32:22+00:00): Hola nig82. Gracias por contribuir a mejorar el mapa.
No se debe editar para el render, porque salga mejor o peor en una aplicación específica.
De todas formas, el problema es que no sigues correctamente las indicaciones para el mapeado en 3D.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Edificios_3D_sencillos
Si tienes dudas puedes consultar en el grupo de OSM España.
https://t.me/OSMes
ricco2712 (2024-06-01 08:15:25+00:00): actually in the Passamaquoddy Indian Township Reservation
Shen nishen (2024-06-07 07:37:49+00:00): Gatha
Frans S (2024-06-08 12:46:20+00:00): Hello Thanks for mapping.
Please be more accurate when you map buildings. Often you just draw a rectangular without following the recessed corners, extensions etc.
When there is a central courtyard, please map those as well.
Best regards
Mxdanger (2024-06-01 10:45:02+00:00): Nice catch with the missing link but it's not exactly the right way to do it. I've updated it with changeset 152115021 if you wanted to take a look at it.
user_11609320 (2024-06-03 07:30:24+00:00): ah, I see. I did it that way because I was following the bay. I was originally going to due it that way, but I was thinking how people just dart out and cause accidents, so i followed the white line. makes sense though.
silversurfer83 (2024-06-01 09:19:36+00:00): Hi Mika :)

wenn du einen Weg fortsetzt, der zuvor in einer Sackgasse endete (noexit=yes), dann entferne diese doch bitte. Ich hab das mal für dich gemacht, dies soll nur ein netter Hinweis für die Zukunft sein :)

Eins noch zu "Sackgassen" in OpenStreetMap: Wir setzen den Wert "noexit=yes" nur, wenn es an dieser Stelle für keinen Verkehrsträger, auch zu Fuß, weitergeht. Das Verkehrszeichen "Sackgasse" bedeutet ja nur, dass hier irgendwo ein Ende für KFZ lauert.

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152110232
Mika99 (2024-06-02 09:52:28+00:00): Hi silversurfer83 ,

danke für den Tipp, das "noexit=yes" hatte ich von der vorherigen Version übernommen. Hatte angenommen, dass so eine Sackgasse gekennzeichnet wird und das Attribut somit bleiben kann, da man mit einem PKW an der Stelle nicht sinnvoll weiterkommt.

Grüße
silversurfer83 (2024-06-02 11:17:52+00:00): 👍🏻
micheleOSM3 (2024-06-02 04:27:39+00:00): Hi, via_ferrata_scale is only allowed for way, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:via_ferrata_scale
Arminus (2024-06-02 06:14:17+00:00): Sorry, I forgot the comment on the change record, please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Via_ferrata#Tagging_as_route=via_ferrata_relation - the via_ferrata_scale tag on relations is used since many years
micheleOSM3 (2024-06-02 12:56:27+00:00): Not exactly: is described on wiki but it is in "proposal draft" status, as you can see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Via_ferrata#Tagging_as_route=via_ferrata_relation.

The tag used on "way" is different because is official, see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Avia_ferrata_scale

Also usage statistics on OSM the tag on "way" is much more used, see:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/via_ferrata_scale#overview

Furthermore, a via ferrata very often has different difficulty levels that can be set on the "way", similarly to the sac_scale tag
Arminus (2024-06-02 15:07:08+00:00): I agree on your last comment, nevertheless, every ferrate as a whole typically has an overall scale. In other words, tags on individual ways classify the "sub scales" (which you typically find a top), while the scale on the entire ferrata classifies the ferrata in its entirety. This is also common practice for other relations like cross country tracks for example.

Anyway, I would kindly invite you to add to the discussion in the referenced wiki-page, this "discussion" here will eventually get lost.
Arminus (2024-06-02 15:07:35+00:00): "find a top" -> find on a topo
micheleOSM3 (2024-06-03 04:20:47+00:00): It is true that some sites and some organizations attribute a difficulty value to the via ferratas for the entire via ferrata, but in a map we have the great advantage of specifying the difficulties in each section, in a similar way to the sac_scale. In any case the commonly used method accepted is to attribute the via_ferrata_scale to the "way".
In this specific case it is even more useful and important given that the via ferrata is made up of various branches, as you can see in the image: https://ibb.co/KyV4b3s

Regarding the link to the wiki, in my opinion it is not necessary, but if you want, you can do it yourself.
Arminus (2024-06-03 06:13:27+00:00): "great advantage of specifying the difficulties in each section"

=> of course, and I didn't remove the scales on any way

What I did was add a scale to the entire ferrata relation. This could theoretically be calculated by picking the highest difficulty of all its ways, but in reality, this might not always be correct, hence the tag.
micheleOSM3 (2024-06-03 06:26:34+00:00): Ok, but I think it is not a good idea for OSM to use unofficial mappings because it encourages an unofficial mapping instead of the official and commonly accepted one. I think it would have been better to write the global value of the difficulty scale in the "description" tag or in the "note" tag.
Arminus (2024-06-03 06:44:26+00:00): Sorry, I disagree. Putting discrete data, which is also clearly defined in its meaning, into a text field (which a data consumer would then need to parse!) is bad database practice. 

Besides, as I said, this approach is also used for https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:piste:type%3Dnordic#The_piste_as_relation and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dmtb - these are clearly established practices and in much wider use compared to the ferratas.

The fact that the ferrata proposal hasn't been voted upon doesn't make the reuse of an existing and agreed upon mapping pattern for this case "unofficial" IMHO.
micheleOSM3 (2024-06-03 21:33:36+00:00): Sorry but I disagree.

The use of the via_ferrata_scale key is described in the official wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Avia_ferrata_scale
Being a key, the only way to use it is the official one which clearly specifies that the key can only be used on the "way" element, see the symbols under "Used on These Elements".

The wiki page you mention has been a "proposal" type for several years, in fact, it isn't even a real proposal, given that it is in "Draft" status, as you can see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Via_ferrata#Tagging_as_route=via_ferrata_relation.
Using the via_ferrata_scale key on a "relation" is in clear conflict with what is specified on the official page.
There cannot be different mapping ways for the same key, the only correct mapping way is the one specified on the official page.
Also on taginfo, you can see that the only reference is to the official wiki:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/via_ferrata_scale#wiki

If you want the key to also be used in "relation", you should propose a change to the official wiki.

Also consider that there are excellent viewers that effectively use the tag as described on the official page, including the value of via_ferrata_scale, for example this one:
https://it.mapy.cz/turisticka?q=sella%20nevea&source=osm&id=142561475&ds=2&x=13.4574869&y=46.4218843&z=16
The official mapping method works, works well and can be visualized well.
rskedgell (2024-06-04 07:47:46+00:00): You appear to have tagged a section of Walsall Road as foot=no in response to a StreetComplete task asking "Are pedestrians forbidden to walk on this road here?"

I'm trying to find any evidence in Bing Streetside imagery that there really is a (signed) pedestrian prohibition here. I cannot see any TSRGD diagram 625.1 "pedestrians prohibited" signs on the imagery, so do not believe that a prohibition exists. Is this a new signed restriction created by a traffic order more recent than the Bing streetside imagery?
https://www.bing.com/maps?toWww=1&redig=0E61462A315B4089ADF0DBB49CFAA9E5&cp=52.545149%7E-1.932508&lvl=19.1&mo=om.1&pi=3.6&style=x&dir=340.5

The wiki states that access tags reflect legal access. Subjective opinions about whether it would be pleasant, a good idea, safe, etc. for a particular transport mode are not relevant to legal access.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot

As real pedestrian prohibitions on public roads other than those tagged as highway=motorway or motorroad=yes in the UK are quite rare and are always signed, this quest is probably better left disabled.
Menheniot (2024-06-04 08:02:45+00:00): The tagging is a result of using SCEE and I think the result of saying "no" to there being paved access, although I could be mistaken. The road in question has no pavement and is fenced off around the crossing area. If the resultant tagging here does not follow definition please feel free to undo this change.
rskedgell (2024-06-04 08:55:53+00:00): The criteria which StreetComplete and SCEE use for this quest make sense in many parts of the world, where pedestrians often are prohibited on sections of road like this. Unfortunately, it doesn't really work in the UK: we either get a correct (but unhelpful to routers) foot=yes, or an incorrect foot=no.

I use SCEE most days and this is the only quest of which I am aware which regularly causes tagging errors.

I'll remove the tag.
rene78 (2024-06-06 17:33:47+00:00): Great work! Thanks so much!
mcliquid (2024-06-16 17:36:23+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-01 09:10:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Osiedle Piastów":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262391714
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288616887
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288616888
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288616889

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Tomkow1933 (2024-06-01 09:13:45+00:00): Dodam co trzeba. Najpierw zajmę się poprawą samych budynków itp. a potem szczegółami.
kubahahaha (2024-06-02 12:58:57+00:00): Dodałem miejsce o odpowiedniej nazwie i przeniosłem nazwę z addr:street do addr:place
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-01 09:10:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262390431
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288617437

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kubahahaha (2024-06-02 12:59:14+00:00): Dodałem miejsce z tą nazwą
Mathias_ADAV (2024-06-20 09:10:01+00:00): Bonjour,
êtes vous certain que le Bld Mendes France soit en piste cyclable sur cette portion ? En regardant les données de la CUD, c'est toujours en bande cyclable. Je refais donc la modification.
BerlineVerlag (2024-06-23 13:44:31+00:00): Bonjour, 
En effet c'est bien une piste cyclable, j'ai dû m'emmêler les pinceaux sur StreetComplete.
Merci d'avoir rectifié.
Frans S (2024-06-07 14:38:51+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
Inaccurate mapped. Not always followed the rooflines.
Central courtyards not included in a mapped building.
Nodes connected to other buildings.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152111451
Frans S (2024-06-07 14:38:54+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
Inaccurate mapped. Not always followed the rooflines.
Central courtyards not included in a mapped building.
Nodes connected to other buildings.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152111451
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-01 09:20:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Osiedle Piastów":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262391817
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288619126
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288619127
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288619128

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kubahahaha (2024-06-02 12:59:17+00:00): Dodałem miejsce o odpowiedniej nazwie i przeniosłem nazwę z addr:street do addr:place