piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
vasony (2024-08-24 06:02:32+00:00): Please provide street name for house number 12 of nng building if not Szépvölgyi út 35-37 otherwise merge existing address point.
perugia_nng (2024-08-26 08:41:03+00:00): Thank you for your notice. It was an accidental house number recording, so I deleted no. 12.
ikhansahil (2024-08-15 16:10:37+00:00): great changes made
Illio (2024-10-31 12:05:54+00:00): Na niektoré z týchto názvov by to chcelo lepší zdroj ako "local knowledge". Napríklad "Fafrunský ostrov" (ešte k tomu ste ho napísali nesprávne s veľkým O) sa nikde na internete nenachádza, rovnako tak "Nudapláž" je ťažko názvom danej pláže.
os-emmer (2024-09-11 15:26:31+00:00): Engish version below

Hola AgusQui
has editado recientemente este sitio que todavía utiliza emergency=ses_station. Esta etiqueta está obsoleta. ¿Sabes si este lugar se ajusta a la página wiki para emergency=disaster_response?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=disaster_response
--------------

Hi AgusQui,
you recently edited this place that still uses emergency=ses_station. This tag is deprecated. Do you know if this place fits the wiki page for emergency=disaster_response?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=disaster_response
AgusQui (2024-09-12 03:32:44+00:00): Usé el tag que viene predefinido en Osmand, habría que avisarles que lo actualicen, después lo corrijo.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-15 16:30:31+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1307991617

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
s777n (2024-09-11 11:05:03+00:00): Добрый день. А вы не подскажите что вы использовали чтобы обрисовать здание лицея Инноватика? Заранее спасибо.
fndoder (2024-09-11 13:20:20+00:00): Границы участка из ЕГРН, официальная проектная документация школ образца 2024 года из тендера (оба источника подходят по лицензии в ОСМ).

Геометрия нарисована примерно, при появлении свежих спутниковых снимков и/или геометрии здания в ЕГРН нужно будет уточнить.
mcliquid (2024-08-17 10:34:35+00:00): Hi, "surface=asphalt" ist hier aber immer noch. Was ist hier die neue Oberfläche? Danke dir.
limes11 (2024-08-17 19:40:14+00:00): Upsi. Sehr aufmerksam, danke. Fällt unter fine_gravel. VG
mcliquid (2024-08-17 19:42:22+00:00): Danke :)
habi (2024-08-16 07:45:55+00:00): Sorry for the USA-spanning changeset...
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-15 13:03:18+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/910884136/history has roof_shape = gabled that was added in this edit
Maybe roof:shape=gabled was intended here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape
GEO ECLA (2024-09-09 14:46:32+00:00): Point d'eau potable à côté de la fontaine ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155292731
GEO ECLA (2024-09-09 14:46:05+00:00): Doublon. Corrigé.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155292776
martinst (2024-08-19 13:27:57+00:00): Der Task bei Maproulette war noch offen, habe ihn geschlossen.
gurglypipe (2024-08-15 21:59:45+00:00): Hiya, if you’re going to add lots of tracks on farmland, please consider adding access=private to them by default. It’s a safer guess than leaving them as publicly accessible. The Public Rights of Way overlay indicates which ones are public. Ta
gurglypipe (2024-08-15 22:20:26+00:00): (Thank you for these improvements along the A6, btw)
JayTurnr (2024-08-15 22:39:32+00:00): Noted, I'll do that
JayTurnr (2024-08-15 22:41:04+00:00): And no problem, I'm doing all the A roads until I get bored. Obviously, it's not perfect, but I don't let perfect by the enemy of good.
Niiepce (2024-08-21 14:27:19+00:00): Hallo wegavision,
Danke für deine Verbesserungen im Neuenheimer Feld.
Beim Weg osm.org/way/1307999238 war highway=service zum Großteil unpassend. Das ist zum Teil auch eine Treppe und ein Weg den Fahrzeuge gar nicht erreichen können. Hab ich verbessert.
Viele Grüße
wegavision (2024-08-22 08:37:23+00:00): Ich habe das Projekt noch nicht beendet (siehe OSM-Forum), warte erst die dortige Diskussion ab. Vermutlich nächste Woche geht es weiter und dann werden auch die Bilder veröffentlicht. Grundproblem ist, dass kaum ein Weg markiert ist, man wirklich aufgrund der Breite ob der Nutzung interpretieren muss.
JeroenvanderGun (2024-08-15 17:27:32+00:00): Article L2512-14 VII. - L'exécution du présent article est assurée par les fonctionnaires de la police nationale ou, le cas échéant, en matière de circulation ou de stationnement, par des agents de la Ville de Paris placés sous l'autorité du préfet de police ou du maire de Paris selon leurs attributions respectives.
NieWnen (2024-08-15 19:19:17+00:00): Cześć,

Zmiany ścieżek i przystanku niestety niezbyt poprawne, przywróciłem poprzednie.

Jeśli chodzi o ścieżki pieszo-rowerowe to zachęcam do zapoznania się z tym wiki, bo edytor iD niestety nie wspiera do tego szablonów:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w
`highway=path` jest poprawne i rekomendowane ;)

Jeśli chodzi o `highway=platform`, to tutaj nie dodajemy do niego `public_transport=platform`, choć iD może to proponować. Jest to akurat bardziej regionalna warszawska zasada, żeby nie duplikować tagów, który już jest na węźle i to na nim są relacje.

W przypadku dodawania barrier "nad czymś", należy dodać odpowiednie layer (tu layer=1), bo nakładało się na to co jest pod wiaduktem (ścieżki/jezdnie).

Powyższe poprawiłem.
YomanNH (2024-08-18 18:12:45+00:00): Niestety ten użytkownik nie czyta komentarzy, albo świadomie je ignoruje i kontynuuje wadliwe mapowanie. Wielokrotnie zwracałem mu uwagę na to, żeby nie niszczył ciągów pieszo-rowerowych, ale jak widać bez skutku...
silversurfer83 (2024-08-16 06:32:19+00:00): Moin :)

der Weg hat weiterhin die Eigenschaft "mtb=yes". Das heißt, das Mountainbike müsste über jeden Baum drüber gehoben werden, ja?
Um zu kennzeichnen, dass es entlang des gesamten bearbeiteten Abschnittes eines Weges Hindernisse gibt, haben wir den tag "obstacle=*". Guck dir das im Wiki mal an:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:obstacle

Falls der Weg gar nicht mehr nutzbar ist, wäre es eine Überlegung wert ihn als "abandoned:highway=path" statt "highway=path" zu taggen.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155294070
RalfL (2024-08-16 08:29:36+00:00): Hallo,
danke für das Feedback.
Du hast recht, auch der größte Profi müsste das Rad rüberheben.
Ich hab die MTBs auch rausgenommen und die "Fallen Trees" mit reingenommen.
marc__marc (2024-10-08 20:00:08+00:00): Bonjour,
où est-ce que cette édition de masse a-t-elle été discutée tant dans les tags que pou son acceptation par la communauté locale ?
Cela n'a à mon avis aucun sens de dire sur quelle route la police nationale peux intervenir.
Cordialement,
Marc
JeroenvanderGun (2024-10-15 09:32:38+00:00): Bonjour,

The main reason for this change was to restore operator=* for these roads to the city of Paris, as it was previously tagged correctly.

If you think enforcement:operator=* is superfluous, feel free to remove it.
DeFra85 (2024-09-19 08:41:41+00:00): What kind of guidepost is this? Hiking? Cycling?
Buraddo (2024-08-16 19:08:19+00:00): Why did you change the classification?
From Strada Constantin cel Mare only right turn is permitted.
This short way is part of the parking entrance towards Kapa Shopping Center, which is an allowed turn (left turn from Strada Divizia 9 Cavalerie)
BlueButterfly (2024-08-20 17:49:34+00:00): Hello Buraddo,
The reason I changed the classification of this way to highway=residential was to carry the higher classification of the connecting highways through the dual carriageway. Looking at this intersection again, I agree with keeping this classified as highway=service due to it’s main purpose (to serve the shopping center) as well as https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8308553 preventing traffic from the residential highway from going through the dual carriageway. 

Thanks for reaching out, and I hope you have a great day!
jjyach (2024-08-15 19:05:42+00:00): Is there still an extra one-way that needs to be removed?  It seems two one way roads going opposite direction are hitting head on at Coolidge Street
bkil (2024-08-15 18:21:55+00:00): Köszönjük a közreműködést. A jelölést a következő módon kellett javítani: https://osm.org/changeset/155296085#map=19/46.78906/17.70213
Road–Runner (2024-08-15 21:26:50+00:00): Hallo. Du hast zahlreiche Wege auf bicycle=yes gestellt, die vorher vom Naturpark Karwendel auf no gestellt wurden. Ich werde deine Änderungen wieder zurücksetzen, da ich ehrlich gesagt den Parkverantwortlichen mehr zutraue, über die Radwege dort Bescheid zu wissen. Wenn es Einwände dagegen gibt, bitte die Quelle für deine Änderungen angeben.
eggie (2024-08-15 18:42:09+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,
BenB Velo droom staat nu 2x op de kaart? Is dat de bedoeling?
Kan de oudere vermelding weg?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-08-15 18:53:00+00:00): Oudere vermelding verwijderd. BAG adresnode behouden
eggie (2024-08-15 18:49:34+00:00): Dag LN,

Wanneer het pad niet meer begaanbaar is (geen doorkomen aan)  maar nog wel een pad dan smoothness=impassable

Wanneer een pad geen functie meer heeft als pad dan disused:highway=path  Dat laatste rendert dan niet meer op de kaart en routeert ook niet.  
MVG
eggie
dieterdreist (2024-08-24 18:59:32+00:00): not a castle
Khidistavi (2024-08-15 21:01:30+00:00): Your argument is based on the wording from the English Wikipedia article (you wrote about it here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155261410), in turn this phrase was added by a certain user in 2021. I removed it from the article, since no source was provided confirming this information.

You should point to a more authoritative resource that will confirm what you said.
Qartezy (2024-08-15 21:44:59+00:00): Hi Khidistavi,

While I did not find a source that exactly said that Yaradullu is De Facto under the  Republic of Armenia, I did find a source that says that part of Yaradullu is in the territory of the Republic of Armenia. It is from Civilnet. I think its best if we put the name like this: Yaradullu - Յարադուլլու. 

Link: https://www.civilnet.am/news/202265/%D5%A1%D5%A4%D6%80%D5%A2%D5%A5%D5%BB%D5%A1%D5%B6%D5%AB-%D5%BE%D5%A5%D6%80%D5%A1%D5%B0%D5%BD%D5%AF%D5%B8%D5%B2%D5%B8%D6%82%D5%A9%D5%B5%D5%A1%D5%B6-%D5%BF%D5%A1%D5%AF-%D5%A3%D5%BF%D5%B6%D5%BE%D5%B8%D5%B2-%D5%B0%D5%A1%D5%B5%D5%AF%D5%A1%D5%AF%D5%A1%D5%B6-%D5%BF%D5%A1%D6%80%D5%A1%D5%AE%D6%84%D5%B6%D5%A5%D6%80%D5%A8%D5%9D-%D5%BF%D5%A1%D5%BE%D5%B8%D6%82%D5%B7%D5%AB-%D5%B4%D5%A1%D6%80%D5%A6%D5%B8%D6%82%D5%B4/
Qartezy (2024-08-15 21:49:43+00:00): Or, Yaradullu/ Յարադուլլու.
ivanbranco (2024-08-16 07:56:04+00:00): Also, what's the meaning of area=yes + barrier=* ?
Qartezy (2024-08-16 15:08:51+00:00): Well before the wikipedia article said that Yaradullu was under Armenian  control, so Khidistavi said it is better to use barrier=* to indicate what the actual boundaries are (De Facto ones), on the ground.
Qartezy (2024-08-16 15:09:56+00:00): Area=yes is just some random area.
ivanbranco (2024-08-16 15:23:15+00:00): I don't follow you, you called Khidistavi a vandal ("Changing vandal changes by Khidistavi") and now you say you are following their advices? Anyway, if they said so, they are wrong: the barrier=* tag is to be used for physical barriers (fenced, walls, blocks, bollards ecc.), not for boundaries.
Qartezy (2024-08-16 15:48:45+00:00): While he did make vandal changes, other than here, he also said to use that because he removed all of the areas which had a military occupation tag, I do not know why he said this but I did not get in anymore arguments about that.
Khidistavi (2024-08-16 20:13:54+00:00): Miknovial,

According to the OpenStreetMap documentation, there is no tag for "military occupation", landuse=military is not intended for this.

In fact, there is no "military occupation", there are only border territories where the border is blurred, but the conflict is approaching the resolution stage, both countries are demarcating the borders.
Khidistavi (2024-08-16 20:15:02+00:00): Dear ivanbranco,

I wrote about barrier=* tags here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155153172 and clearly noted that these tags should be used for mapping physical barriers, however, he is trying to misinterpret what I said.

As for the removal of many landuse=military polygons containing "Currently controlled by Armenia/Azerbaijan" in the name, I decided to remove them after consulting with experienced mappers in the Telegram chat, woodpeck also wrote to me about this https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152548741 "Please do not abuse the "name" tag to place messages on the map. If these are military areas that have a name then put these names in the "name" tag - "currently controlled by X" is not an appropriate name tag."

I also want to introduce you to the background of this user, for several months he has been vandalizing the region, trying to replace Azerbaijani toponyms with Armenian ones within Azerbaijan and tried to "revive" the Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh, here are his accounts:

Raqif Mingaçuv:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154821914
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154618566
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155208816

Teymur Gulbadov:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154077406

MapHay123:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152012070
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152049379

OPENSTREETMAP OPERATION:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153837912
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152912603
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152918208
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152472962

As you can see, on August 15, he created an account Miknovial and continued his malicious activity:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155255590
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155219001
He clearly doesn't look like a newbie and the changes are suspiciously similar to those I listed above.
Qartezy (2024-08-17 22:43:40+00:00): Dear ivanbranco, and Khidistavi

Only account that was mine is MapHay123, and I apologize, I could send changsets of what type of vandalism you have done but I won't, either we can continue with better relations, or if not I will put your changesets on here your choice.
Qartezy (2024-08-17 23:12:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155153172
Qartezy (2024-08-17 23:14:02+00:00): This is the link to your changeset of the barriers, and military area
Khidistavi (2024-08-18 07:37:06+00:00): In my previous message I already explained the reason for deleting these objects and provided a link to the changeset, but instead of providing counter arguments against their deletion, you continue to baselessly call me a "vandal".
Khidistavi (2024-08-18 08:33:10+00:00): "The only account that was mine is MapHay123, and I apologize"

This is a lie, but we will take note of your admission regarding MapHay123's ownership; all five accounts have the same handwriting, and were created sequentially: Teymur Gulbadov was blocked on July 19, the next day (July 20) Raqif Mingaçuv was registered, with characteristic vandalistic edits: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154239626

By the way, the nature of some your edits from Raqif Mingaçuv and Miknovial accounts is absolutely identical, next time be more careful when trying to deceive someone:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155347107
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155263251
Filip009 (2024-08-19 08:58:47+00:00): Ono je to tak naschvál, pretože sa jedná o polovičný profil diaľnice.
StefanHRT (2024-08-16 08:01:58+00:00): #deleteCyclewayInformation?
Langlaeufer (2025-12-05 06:37:31+00:00): Hallo momabebra,
die Bordsteine sind teilweise falsch herum erfasst. Die rechte Seite der Linie (in ID die Dreiecke) sollte zu Straße (also zur Seite mit dem Höhenabsatz) weisen.
rene78 (2024-08-17 08:58:33+00:00): Hi angys,

I think you are looking for the tag "building:flats" instead of "unit".

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:flats
angys (2024-08-18 03:15:19+00:00): Yeah i mis-tagged, tq
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-08-15 21:50:32+00:00): Hi and welcome! This is not really a skatepark, it's a pump track 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pump_track

It's already added. This point can be removed.

It's correct though that you've removed the name. If it a skatepark needed here, we shouldn't add description and types of features into names.

About your other edit with a water tap, it's already added too and with better tagging as drinking water, not just unknown tap with unknown water quality. It's added 8 days ago, so you probably can't see it in OrganicMaps. So your water tap can be removed too.
AnnaCatarina (2025-05-18 10:38:10+00:00): Hello, line 2 of SITEUR is undoubtable a LRT. Both of Your arguments are not parameters of the definitions of light rail and metros. And the first one "aisloado" is even wrong, because at Juarez, there is a tunnel linking line 2 with line 1 to allow trains from line 1 to reach the joint workshop and depot at Tetlán (see https://archive.org/details/guadalajara-hacia-un-tren-ligero-de-vida/page/7/mode/2up on pages 73-76 in Spanish or pages 140 in English). Second argument does not even fit on several metro systems, because they are mostly elevated.
There is clear parameters, which make line 2 a LRT: trains at first. They are a lot shorter than metro trains, just compare them to the trains on line 3. Gives them the possibility to drive much tighter curves than metro trains of line 3 with appr. 24 m distance between bogies. And so on and so on. But next to all technical specifications, which make line 2 a LRT, one more strong argument for LRT is the joint use of the same train types on both lines 1 and 2 including the joint shops at Tetlán. Thank You.
gscscnd (2024-08-16 08:21:39+00:00): maxspeed:hgv:conditional itp.
Mariusz Dykierek (2024-08-16 08:40:27+00:00): Dzięki za uwagę i mam w związku z nią pytanie. Czy maxspeed mniejsza od warunkowej stosuje się tak jak znak tj. ogranicza do tego co widnieje na znaku? Jeszcze rok temu tych znaków nie było i na 99% wynikają one ze złego stanu jezdni. Stawiam, że wcześniej czy później zostaną skasowane.
gscscnd (2024-08-16 09:32:56+00:00): Z punktu widzenia OSM, dla pojazdów hgv tag maxspeed:hgv:conditional ma wyższy priorytet niż maxspeed. Było też o tym niedawno na forum:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ograniczenia-predkosci-jak-to-poprawnie-zrobic/104075/21
Na dzisiaj należałoby albo takie tagi usunąć, albo zmienić im nazwy, np. construction:maxspeed:hgv:conditional, tak żeby konsumenci danych nie brali ich pod uwagę. Do JOSM są szablony do zestawów ograniczeń np. dla autostrad czy dla dróg na terenie niezabudowanym, łatwiej za ich pomocą usunąć tymczasowe ograniczenia i wprowadzić ustawowe.
Mariusz Dykierek (2024-08-16 11:26:25+00:00): Dostosowałem te hgv do obowiązującego znaku.
gscscnd (2024-08-16 11:36:24+00:00): Dzięki!
silversurfer83 (2025-04-08 19:43:45+00:00): Hi :)

weil ich grad eine Änderung an dem kleinen Stück Gewässerfläche der Alme sehe, welches du zuerst erstellt hast hätte ich mal ne Frage:
Warum hast du nur dieses kleine Stück als Fläche eingetragen?

Grüße
silversurfer83
bielebog (2025-04-10 05:56:59+00:00): Vermutlich nach einem Foto, das ich vom östlich verlaufenden Weg aus in der Vorbeifahrt aufgenommen hatte. Da war da noch ganz frisch und Luftbilder gab's noch nicht.
totera (2024-08-16 07:38:36+00:00): Ciao Pilù1, dovresti utilizzare dei commenti significativi che permettano agli altri mappatori di capire che cosa hai modificato (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments)
totera (2024-08-16 08:06:01+00:00): Inoltre, hai cancellato il nodo del distributore e hai aggiunto il tag amenity=fuel alla tettoia già presente. Ci sono due problemi:
1) hai cancellato tutti gli altri tag del distributore, relativi a gestore, marca, carburanti venduti, ecc.
2) tettoia e distributore sono due oggetti distinti che andrebbero mappati con due elementi diversi; per il distributore si può usare un nodo o un'area intorno alla zona destinata al rifornimento che comprende al suo interno la tettoia (ho corretto in questo modo)
canfe (2024-08-17 10:39:33+00:00): La via non può chiamarsi Borgata Bert, quello va messo sul place.
Rimosso.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155298108
Baölo (2024-08-17 10:41:13+00:00): Il cartello riporta letteralmente "Borgata Bert",la via non ha un nome se non quello
canfe (2024-08-17 19:17:30+00:00): Il cartello indica il nome della borgata non della via.
Borgata non è un DUG (cerca in rete e trovi l'elenco).
Purtroppo è un concetto un po' ostico per chi inizia.
Le via hanno pari e dispari dai due lati. Le località (che non corrispondono alle locality!) li hanno più o meno a caso coi numeri piccoli in genere al centro.
Cambia tutto.
Il guaio di streetcomplete è che si può mappare anche senza sapere che tag si mettono e se non lo si sa, non si va a vedere sulla wiki... prima.
Coraggio, basta studiare.
EP_Repair (2024-09-19 16:08:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 156828296 where the changeset comment is: Reverting street name changes which include abbreviated name or are on non-public roads
emersonveenstra (2024-08-16 12:27:45+00:00): Hi there,

Looks like you created two nearly identical relations for the same river: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17940294#map=15/45.0169/-112.8486 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17940267#map=15/45.0169/-112.8486

Could you please fix this? Thanks!
jtrull (2024-08-16 15:10:05+00:00): Thanks for catching this. I believe this is fixed by Changeset 155332582. I thought I fixed this waterway relation and used a grouping to convert the areas to lines for a multipolygon relation, but I missed the duplicate relation that was created as I did this. Thanks!
Kanoxitu_zh (2024-08-16 14:32:59+00:00): 致敬
EP_Repair (2024-09-19 16:08:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 156828296 where the changeset comment is: Reverting street name changes which include abbreviated name or are on non-public roads
EP_Repair (2024-09-19 16:10:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 156828359 where the changeset comment is: Reverting street name changes which include abbreviated name or are on non-public roads
eggie (2024-08-15 20:11:17+00:00): Hoi Rob,
Het lijkt logisch wat je doet, maar OSM is niet zo logisch.
Wanneer er een bord met de tekst fietspad staat dan is het een Onverplicht fietspad G13

Zie hier de tagging voor de verschillende fietspaden
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway

Pas je het aan.
Op een fietspad hoort geen bicycle=designated. Dat zijn defaults. 
foot=yes zie je wel, maar hoeft ook niet. 
Dus in dit geval moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-08-15 20:33:22+00:00): Je fietspad eindigt ook op een wandelpad.. is dat wellicht ook een fietspad?
eggie (2024-08-15 20:38:23+00:00): Ik heb het hele traject aangepast naar G13 .. bicycle=designated en yes verwijderd.
Vanaf de Wolfhezerweg is G13
Groet
eggie
Chopper Rob (2024-08-15 20:58:30+00:00): Hoi Eggie, dat laatste stuk tot de wolfhezerweg is inderdaad ook onderdeel van het fietspad.
Ik zie dat je alles al hebt aangepast, thx.
eggie (2024-08-15 21:08:06+00:00): Nou... je zou nog even naar de surface kunnen kijken. Die staat nu unpaved.. maar volgens mij is het daar surface=fine_gravel.  Dat wordt als een soort verhard gezien op fietskaarten.
Nu routeert het niet als je onverhard vermijden aan hebt staan.
Weet jij hoe het zit?
Gr eggie