piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marcusberner (2024-04-19 10:34:29+00:00): Hallo Flo,

ich bin Datenversorger in der Leitstelle für Feuerwehr und Rettungsdienst des Kreises Minden-Lübbecke (NRW). Unser Einsatzleitsystem nutzt als Kartenwerk die Openstreetmap. Gerade in den Grenzbereichen unseres Kreisgebietes werden Straßenbezeichnungen von NRW fälschlicherweise in Niedersachsen weitergeführt, so auch hier. Da geht bei der Disposition wertvolle Zeit durch Nachfragen beim Notrufer verloren. Der Schaumburger Weg gehört zur Stadt Minden und endet an der Landesgenze zu Niedersachsen. Die weiteren 500 Mter bis zur nächsten Kreuzung sind lt. LGLN Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen Namenlos. Danke für den Hinweis "noname=yes", werde ich berücksichtigen.
flohoff (2024-04-19 11:44:57+00:00): Hmmm,
ich wäre da vorsichtiger - denn der nächste Mapper wird das mit dem namen wieder eintragen wenn es steht dort nirgends ein schild das exakt an dieser Stelle der name endet - Deshalb ist der ansatz zwar ehrenvoll aber vermutlich aussichtslos. Das sollten wir vielleicht mal im Forum weiterdiskutieren. Das thema gibts es ja durchaus auch nicht nur an Landes sondern auch an Kreisgrenzen das es hier Namens"unschärfen" gibt.

Flo
flohoff (2024-04-19 11:52:30+00:00): Hier mal für eine größere Audience:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/namen-ohne-strassen-kreis-landesgrenzen/112036
Frans S (2024-04-27 11:26:35+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project. Please do not tag paths as footway in this area. Read what the wiki says about it.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway
Here, just tag them as path.
Best regards
HellMap (2024-04-20 14:11:17+00:00): Hi!

Thanks for taking the interest in editing the map. I would like to make sure you know that this is a live version of the map, which means any of your edits will become public. This means you should not make test edits.

We've already corrected your couple edits.

Thanks
aharvey (2025-11-12 02:35:07+00:00): you seem to be quiet on top of construction changes, could you check the change at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172465660 ?
flohoff (2024-04-19 09:50:27+00:00): Moin
ich glaube das war absicht das JuanCarlos80 das nur mit motor_vehicle=no getagged hatte weil man zu Fuß/Fahrrad da immer noch durch kann?

Flo
Supaplex030 (2024-04-19 18:58:49+00:00): Hallo momabebra, wie in früheren CS bereits angemerkt hast du hier erneut Einfahrten gelöscht die augenscheinlich noch existieren (Löhleinstraße 61-65), daher habe ich die Änderungen hier teils rückgängig gemacht.
lg, Alex
Syl (2024-04-20 08:21:28+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai enlevé les attributs leaf_type et species qui ne contenaient pas d'information. Si leur valeur est inconnue il n'y a rien à mettre.
OPALE Lyon 1 (2024-04-20 08:57:42+00:00): argh : idem que pour la note, c'était pour faire des tests avec StreetComplete...
Syl (2024-04-20 09:50:22+00:00): Utiliser une note pour des tests ça peut passer, mais modifier directement la base de données avec des données vides pour tester c'est problématique. Elle n'a pas pour but de faire des tests.
Et si StreetComplete ne correspond pas à ce que vos besoins c'est à StreetComplete (ou autre application) de s'améliorer, il n'y a pas à ajouter des informations fausses dans la base de données pour ça.

Si vous voulez préciser ce que vous testez (par message privé ou sur le forum français plutôt qu'ici), je veux bien voir comment résoudre la situation.
Bonne journée.
M!dgard (2024-04-19 09:04:33+00:00): These nodes were created with the faulty editing software, have not been touched in this restoration CS, and should be checked manually:

https://osm.org/node/11813663837
https://osm.org/node/11813654137
https://osm.org/node/11813659242
https://osm.org/node/11813665612
https://osm.org/node/11813667090
https://osm.org/node/11813662039
https://osm.org/node/11813617607

These nodes have seen later modifications (after an edit with the faulty software), may not have been touched in this restoration CS, and should be checked manually:

https://osm.org/node/11538114640
M!dgard (2024-04-19 09:07:59+00:00): ↑ All checked and corrected!
Jakka (2024-04-19 18:34:48+00:00): Ik vermoed niet dat dit een parking is .....
Een gebouw met garages eronder mogelijk en de name Leuven ? ....
Graag dringend antwoord
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-19 12:19:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150221108 where the changeset comment is: revert unwanted change to BAG street name spellings
Vinber-Pro (2024-05-22 05:30:34+00:00): bonjour,
bien partant pour améliorer la carto du lycée mais attention car là c'est un magasin (au sens de commerce) dans le lycée, cela me surprend.

Que veulent dire les noms FM, MA, OB, OM ?

et en avant pour une belle carto de ce lycée :)
flohoff (2024-04-19 09:49:30+00:00): Moin,
bitte abgerissene Gebäude solange die im Luftbild oder Liegenschaftskataster sichtbar sind nicht löschen sondern mit den lifecycle tags umtaggen - also aus building=yes ein razed:building=yes oder demolished:building=yes.

Sonst kommt der nächste mapper und trägt die vom Luftbild wieder ein.

So für das nächste mal.

Flo
大山かなめ (2024-04-19 09:32:05+00:00): 「市名に都道府県を含めていた不正なデータを修正」ですが、取り急ぎ市と県を分離する修正のみしており、町名以下は要修正です
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-19 12:19:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150221108 where the changeset comment is: revert unwanted change to BAG street name spellings
silversurfer83 (2024-04-19 09:32:24+00:00): Gude und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap

danke, dass du hilfst die Karte aktuell zu halten :)

Kontrolle mit den eigenen Augen ist das Beste was wir hier haben können und die Änderung sieht soweit ganz gut aus. Danke.

Kurz vor der Kurve ziemlich genau südlich von Lutterberg ist eine kleine Brücke, die hast du nicht bearbeitet. Da könntest du nochmal drauf schauen, ob die Werte passen. Sonst sieht auf den ersten Blick alles schick aus.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150212927
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-19 12:19:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150221108 where the changeset comment is: revert unwanted change to BAG street name spellings
silversurfer83 (2024-04-19 09:34:27+00:00): Ah. Hier hast du die Brücke erwischt :)

Dafür weiter südlich bei Landwehrhagen wieder einen kurzen Schnipsel nicht angefasst.

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150213248
dadavid (2024-04-24 08:09:51+00:00): Hi De-man :) 

Danke für deine Bearbeitungen. Ich hab den Fehler mit der Brücke, der Silversurfer auch schon aufgefallen ist, jetzt mal repariert, mach dir da also keinen Stress. 

Weiterhin viel Spass beim mappen :) 

Grüße

David
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-19 12:19:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150221108 where the changeset comment is: revert unwanted change to BAG street name spellings
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-19 12:19:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150221108 where the changeset comment is: revert unwanted change to BAG street name spellings
tastrax (2024-04-21 02:52:38+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Holbormon (2024-04-22 02:18:28+00:00): Thank you so much for the clarification ! I'm not native to Australia, so when I saw the 8-digit number on a sign I didn't know whether to assume +61 4 or +61 8. I'm guessing a landline makes more sense indeed !
Jakka (2024-04-21 07:57:23+00:00): Uw toevoeging is niet correct, je tekent een weg boven een bestaande... https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1274042560#map=19/50.80250/3.25270
Wat is de bestaande toestand, wat bepaalt dat er geen andere door mogen verkeersbord ? Dan pas ik deze aan.
Jakka (2024-04-21 08:01:45+00:00): zijn deze kussens recent verwijderd ?
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=431108875813568
RLRoy (2024-04-22 07:53:39+00:00): Mijn excuses voor de slechte edit, ik ben nieuw is het editeren (bedankt voor de amiltjes, ik neem ze eens aandachtig door zodat ik volgende keer betere voorstellen kan ingeven).

Het is zod at het verkeer voor cannaerthof nog enkel verloopt via marquettehof, tenzij voor voegangers en fietsers. Er is dus een knip tussen cannaerthof en cannaertstraat.


Het kussen is verwijderd want het kruispunt van Marquettehof (nieuwe straat) en Cannaertstraat is een verhoogd kruispunt geworden.
Jakka (2024-04-22 08:27:16+00:00): OK thx
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-19 12:19:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150221108 where the changeset comment is: revert unwanted change to BAG street name spellings
A67-A67 (2024-04-19 10:04:27+00:00): Net als gisteren ben je weer grasvelden aan het verwijderen. 
Graag een wijk toevoegen op een nieuwe node/punt i.p.v. een bestaand object om te zetten naar een wijk.
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-19 12:19:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150221108 where the changeset comment is: revert unwanted change to BAG street name spellings
fdemmer (2024-05-18 10:26:37+00:00): was the change of way 339889425 (Moore Hall forest) in the north/west maybe an accident? both mapbox and bing show the forest to extend out to where it was in the previous version (6).
b-unicycling (2024-05-18 13:49:18+00:00): I think it must have been. It should be fixed now.
Marek-M (2024-04-19 11:41:40+00:00): Cześć, nie dopisuj nazw opisowych do short_name. Czym jest dany obiekt jest już opisane podstawowymi tagami takimi jak public_transport=* czy też amenity=* - pozwolę sobie wycofać te zmiany.
Marek-M (2024-04-19 11:42:27+00:00): Nazwy opisowe zostały nieprawidłowo wprowadzone jako short_name.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150219566
eggie (2024-04-19 11:09:14+00:00): Je edits zijn aangepast. De leisure=park ligt al als een losse deken met naam over het geheel heen.
Svp niet de landuse verwijderen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-04-19 11:06:40+00:00): De naam van een park zet je op de leisure=park die als een losse deken overal overheen ligt Net zo als bij het stadspark. Gebrui, dat als vorbeeld.
Ik draai deze wijziging terug.  
Of reageer hier even dan kunnen we wellicht helpen hoe zoiets aan te pakken.
MVG
eggie
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-04-19 11:07:36+00:00): Je edits zijn  inmiddels door een medemapper teruggedraaid.
gr eggie
pitscheplatsch (2024-04-22 09:13:29+00:00): Hi santa555a, welcome to OSM.

Just a test?

---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-edits-tile
Noktoborus (2024-04-29 12:18:24+00:00): Здравствуйте, Константин,

Что здесь Вы улучшали и детализировали?
Зачем были добавлены новые traffic_signals на пересечения, где уже есть highway=traffic_signals?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-19 10:10:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Wola Dębowiecka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11830219500
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11830219501
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/698281789
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/698281856
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/698281861
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/984506460
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/984541520
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/992444562
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993178985

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Andrea Musuruane (2024-04-20 08:07:45+00:00): Ciao. access=residents;emergency non sono valori noti: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:access?uselang=it#Valori Quale tipo di restrizione volevi inserire? Ciao, Andrea
matteo564 (2024-04-20 08:29:42+00:00): Ciao, li ho inseriti perche' me li suggeriva iD, grazie; tra l'altro non sapevo come metterli multipli; solo residenti e mezzi di servizio, e forse ciclisti, tra l'altro quel pezzo di strada e' molto strano perche' e' a senso unico e si puo' solo uscire: c'e' un segno di stop largo tutta la carreggiata, ho lasciato a doppio senso. La prossima volta che passo faccio una foto al cartello e alla segnaletica orizzontale
Andrea Musuruane (2024-04-21 08:34:16+00:00): Ciao. L'accesso solo residenti è access=private. Aggiungi il tag emergency=yes per indicare che i mezzi di soccorso possono entrare. Ciao, Andrea
matteo564 (2024-04-22 14:12:29+00:00): ok, ho sistemato, grazie.
Ff Dewa (2024-04-21 19:33:47+00:00): Why has this been reverted?
woodpeck (2024-04-21 22:22:07+00:00): Because we don't use abbreviations in street names in OSM.
pitscheplatsch (2024-04-22 09:13:24+00:00): Hi santa555a, welcome to OSM.

Just a test?

---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-edits-tile
cats_pajamas (2024-04-23 19:38:03+00:00): Hello MACEDONICUS, I noticed that you have changed the classification of many highways in the city of Skopje from primary/secondary down to tertiary. I see from your changeset comment that you believe these should be tertiary since they are lacking ‘A’ or ‘R’ status.

I believe that these should be changed back to their previous classifications based on a couple of things. First, the Macedonia roads tagging page on the OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Macedonia/Macedonian_roads_tagging) says that the proposed classification system that is based on the highway’s legal category (i.e. A-roads and R-roads) is to only be used "out of settlements” and with "taking into account their importance”. Which, from my understanding, would mean this system only loosely applies to rural roads and not for cities like Skopje. This page also mentions (and links to) the OSM Wiki’s highway=* page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Assumptions), stating highways that are not motorways or express roads should be classified only by their importance and intended main use.

How would you feel about changing these highways back to their previous classifications, so we can retain an accurate highway hierarchy (based on importance) within Skopje? Looking forward to hearing from you!
MatejMecka (2024-04-26 22:28:35+00:00): Hello cats_pajamas, and hello MACEDONICUS. I will take my stand on this issue with cats_pajamas,

This classification is plain wrong. Not only this is a mass automated edit without consulting the Macedonian OSM Community or even attempting to do so, placing purposefully information without research harms the data. 

The official stance on the Public Department on Roads and Paths for Skopje does not classify them as Territary Roads. Source: https://uip-gov-mk.translate.goog/magistralni-i-sobirni-ulitsi/?_x_tr_sl=mk&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp

For example let's take Boulevard Ilinden. That is not a TERTIARY ROAD! It's Tag based on the Macedonian Wiki is that it should take the highway tag!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mk:Map_Features

These changesets need to be reverted ASAP!
MACEDONICUS (2024-04-30 13:53:47+00:00): highway=primary should not be used. Why? Because does not connect highways with other countries.
Maybe highway=secondary?
MACEDONICUS (2024-04-30 13:54:19+00:00): Sorry for late response, but there is no notification about this "talk" :)
MatejMecka (2024-05-01 12:50:46+00:00): If you look at the[General Urbanistic Plan for the City of Skopje](https://gisportal.skopje.gov.mk/gup/) you would see that the boulevards are classified as Magistral highways. Based on the Macedonian OSM Week, all magistral highways are tagged with highway=primary. If the City of Skopje treats them as magistral highways, then we cannot treat them as regional paths. So how should we classify them? The Current classification for Skopje makes sense. We cannot categorize them all as one category. And we cannot do our own classification since Skopje has already decided on that.
MACEDONICUS (2024-05-01 21:26:24+00:00): Magistral street is not magistral highway.
On magistral highway i drive 100 kmph, not 50 kmph. But ok, Skopje is cosmodrome. Motorway is the best tag.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-19 10:18:58+00:00): waiting for rate limit to continue
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-19 12:19:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150221108 where the changeset comment is: revert unwanted change to BAG street name spellings
mgerken (2024-04-20 11:40:10+00:00): Moin,

die aktulisierte Einwohnerzahl von Baden habe ich im passenden Node korrigiert https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/614409008 , sonst den Changeset allerdings zurückgesetzt. An der Obernstraße war eine Haltestelle plötzlich sehr groß.

Beste Grüße
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-19 10:19:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1274055536/history/1 - jakiego rodzaju reklama tu jest?
giocomai (2024-04-19 10:20:29+00:00): Errata corrige: Link corretto a Mapillary è il seguente: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=960933537979483
A67-A67 (2024-04-19 10:48:25+00:00): Hoi,
Volgens de afspraken binnen OSM worden geen afkortingen gebruikt in de tag name. Daarom schrijven we de straatnaam uit op de weg zelf. De BAG-straatnaam met afkortingen kan wel toegevoegd worden in de tag official_name. 

Op de adressen zelf zijn je wijzigingen wel correct. In de tag addr:street gebruiken we de BAG-straatnaam met afkortingen. 

Zie ook: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Straatnamen_in_Nederland#Straatnaam_met_afkortingen
HellMap (2024-04-20 14:04:38+00:00): Jūsu izmaiņā atkal ir nepareizi klasificēts ceļš ar nesaprotamu trajektoriju, kas ortofoto šķērso sētu un kokus, bet nesavienojas ar tur par esošiem ceļiem. Ja šeit ir nozīmīgas ceļu izmaiņas, kas nav vēl atspoguļotas ortofoto, tad lūdzu tās 
paskaidrot. Ņemot vērā problēmas iepriekšējās izmaiņās, neviens nevar pārliecināties par šādu izmaiņu pareizību un atbilstību, tāpēc šo ceļu nodzēšu līdz varam saņemt situācijas aprakstu.
silversurfer83 (2024-04-19 15:10:23+00:00): Gude :)

ein, zwei Tips:
In NRW stehen uns sehr gute Daten des Landes zur Verfügung. Wenn du Dinge in die Karte zeichnest, die dort (DOP, ALKIS,...) noch nicht vorhanden sind, dann ist es nicht verkehrt ein Feld mit einem Hinweis an die Kolleg*innen an dem Objekt zu hinterlassen. Beispiel:
"fixme=Umrisse geschätzt. Nach ALKIS-Update verbessern"

So ein Bungalow ist in der Regel ja sauber rechteckig. Daher einfach nach Auswahl des Objekttyps einfach mal die Taste "Q" auf der Tastatur betätigen. Das macht das ausgewählte Objekt rechteckig.

Happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150216341
pitfire (2024-04-19 12:13:24+00:00): Hi Thorsel,
die Bahnübergänge haben keine "crossing:barrier=full", gleichbedeutend mit einer Vollschranken. Hier gibt es lediglich ein "crossing:saltire=* Andreaskreutz" mit "crossing:light=* Lichtzeichenanlage"
Thorsel (2024-04-19 12:21:35+00:00): Ja, sehe ich auch so. Da Muß ich wohl noch lernen die App zu bedienen. Dachte es geht nur um die Schranke (Schlagbaum).
eggie (2024-04-20 10:47:13+00:00): Beste..

Svp niet name=Kledinginzameling gebruiken.
In extra tags kun je aangeven dat het om kleding gaat. Zie de wiki bij in zo n geval.

Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2024-04-19 10:53:40+00:00): Beste jlinderhof   

leisure=park is niet de juiste tag voor een sportpark

De velden zijn ook geen leisure=park 
Dat moet zijn leisure=pitch
 Ik zal je wijzigingen terugdraaien.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-04-19 11:03:48+00:00): Ik heb het sportpark hersteld.
Wanneer je iets aan een sportpark wilt aanpassen kijk dan svp eerst in de wiki hoe zoiets aan te passen of vraag even hulp op het forum.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-04-19 11:41:10+00:00): PB gestuurd met het verzoek om te reageren.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-21 00:33:29+00:00): what's with the pipelines?
user_9221753 (2024-04-21 07:06:17+00:00): These are temporary sample for making symmetric ways on highways.
I must set them as something, or else i cannot keep it saved on openstreetmaps!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-21 07:43:58+00:00): please don't save fake data.
user_9221753 (2024-04-21 08:06:24+00:00): As soon I complete I delete this measurement stuff.
Unfortunately there is no other way to keep this measurment stuff.!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-21 08:23:07+00:00): It's never ok to add fake data! Actual data is more important than some miniscule accuracy improvement. If you really want more tools for parallel ways use JOSM plugins. Otherwise I'll refer the matter to DWG.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-21 08:32:29+00:00): For reference at least 17,000 fake data points from as long as 3 years ago were never deleted.
user_9221753 (2024-04-21 12:58:26+00:00): For this that I am making, copy paste of ways for parallel ways does not work.
Just be patient. I use openstreetmap data while driving & travelling and I care for accuracy and right data
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-21 22:58:44+00:00): "I care for accuracy and right data"
Leaving 17,000 fake data points suggests otherwise
user_9221753 (2024-04-22 05:51:48+00:00): Which 17.000 fake? Did you delete the measurements circles?
DID YOU DELETE THE CIRCLES???
user_9221753 (2024-04-22 05:53:12+00:00): I explained you why i made these circles, WHY DID YOU DELETE THEM?
user_9221753 (2024-04-22 05:59:00+00:00): You are a fucking ASSHOLE, I EXPLAINED YOU WHY I MADE THESE CIRCLES, YOU IDIOT.
Taya_S (2024-04-22 06:13:05+00:00): Hi, fake objects do not belong on OSM. They had every right to be deleted.
user_9221753 (2024-04-22 06:45:12+00:00): I gave full explanation why they temporary had to be there. Do you understand English?
When i finish the alignment I delete them.
I only keep some samples BECAUSE I CANNOT COMPLETE THE JOB AT ONCE.
I HAVE TO KEEP SOME SAMPLES DO THAT TO COMPLETE THE JOB DAY BY DAY.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-22 08:17:06+00:00): Yes I deleted the 17,000 fake data points and will continue to do so. I have also referred the matter to the DWG.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
user_9221753 (2024-04-22 09:14:22+00:00): Which 17000 points?
You keep being lier, you dont respect me method for making alignments, and there will be consequences!
I explained you the use of these circles, i cannot finish alignment in 1 day, I have to keep and save these circles - samples so that to continue the next day. Do you understand english?
zluuzki (2024-04-22 19:30:00+00:00): If you use these circles to create more accurate mapping, there is no issue with doing that, just make sure you don't tag those circles with tags that imply things that aren't there like "man_made=pipeline", use tags like "note=temporary mapping help" or similar, and remove them when you finished mapping the alignment.
SomeoneElse (2024-04-22 22:22:29+00:00): Hello Map-Finder,
Andy from the DWG here.  Actually, there are plenty of ways that you can have "alignment" data and never save it to OSM.  With JOSM, just add what you need to another layer and don't save that layer.  Even with iD you could create alignment data as a GPX file locally and drag it onto iD when open.
There are people (including me!) that actually create maps showing pipelines; we don't want small circles showing up at every bend in the road.
If you'd like help with how to map _without_ saving alignment data with fake tags to OSM, please ask at the forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/help-and-support/7/none .
Also, reacting in the way you did above really isn't OK.  Please don't do that.
Incidentally, you can still get to your alignment data even though it's been deleted from OSM via Overpass.  See e.g. https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1KkV .
user_9221753 (2024-04-23 04:40:35+00:00): I used a tag just in order that not to be deleted, because its obvious what was the use of them, when you see them on the way!