piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-02 11:30:20+00:00): Opened https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/23594#ticket - and just fixed some presets in https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Presets/CampingForOverlanders?action=diff&version=11 and https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Presets/OSMRookie?action=diff&version=9

Opened https://github.com/BikeCitizens/bikecitizens-taginfo/issues/2

https://geo.dianacht.de/topo/ looks to be not developed anymore and I see no issue tracker so I will skip this one

wikidata_org is also listed as a project, but they just list OSM tags (in a glorious duplication of OSM Wiki and Wikibase which is actually distinct from Wikidata but runs Wikidata software...)

Once https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/landuse=farm_land#projects is not listed anymore as supported by OSMRookie/Level 3/Landuse  JOSM user preset I will investigate again JOSM user presets using this typos.

(I noticed intermittent 500 error codes on taginfo, hopefully my check is not causing them - I would prefer to avoid implementing taginfo database dump support...)

And I will definitely need to rearchitecture some of my internal data structures to stop spurious reports - they may hide actual ones.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-03 16:25:43+00:00): https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Presets/MountainbikeTrails?action=diff&version=7 and https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/23597 are final changes for now

I may make more report - if Osmand or some other place will process my reports, then I will reenable reports for them. Especially Osmand has looooong list.

So I may make more but I will not post them here (unless you will request it)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-17 13:44:46+00:00): I marked it as resolved at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/fix_many_obvious_typos#Discussion - let me know if you think that more should be done
Jordi MF (2024-03-23 20:46:05+00:00): Hola Halvklart,

He revisado la ortofotos del Visor de la GVA y la zona aún está en construcción. Las calles no existen. Si las calles no están terminadas, lo mejor será etiquetar la vías como highway=construction.
Además, el nombre de la calle no puede ser "Cañada de Trilles". Ese es el nombre de la urbanización en construcción.
Saludos.
Halvklart (2024-03-25 11:39:45+00:00): Hola Jordi, 
Deje la referencia al Visor de la GVA para comprobar la posicion de las calles. 
Todas las calles que he agregado se encuentran en estado completo y abierto para el tráfico, incluyendo carriles bici. 

He tenido que dejar el nombre "Cañada de Trilles" para todas las calles, como aparecen todavia así en el catastro. Supongo que pronto se dará otros nombres. Estaré pendiente para actualizar. 

Saludos
Jordi MF (2024-03-25 13:48:52+00:00): Perfecto,
Por tanto, no digo nada. Pero el nombre sí que es incorrecto aunque aparezca en el Catastro. En OSM no aceptamos esos nombres (por ejemplo, tampoco aceptamos como válidas las calles que se llaman 'Calle en Proyecto 1, 2, 3,' etc.). Se dejan sin nombre y, cuando el ayuntamiento las denomine, ya las añadiremos. En este caso, seguramente serás tú porque te enterarás antes que los que no vivimos allí.

Salutacions,
Jordi
map per (2024-03-21 20:52:22+00:00): Ich reviewe grad ein paar deiner Änderungen ;-)
Hier ist mir aufgefallen, dass amenity=parking_entrance nur auf Nodes und nicht für Flächen verwendet werden sollte (vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_entrance)

Viele Grüße
map per
UKausch (2024-03-22 18:36:01+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, das hatte ich tatsächlich nicht geprüft.  Jetzt sollte es passen.
maro21 (2024-05-01 14:14:11+00:00): Zmiany wycofane po dyskusji społeczności: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dekolonizacja-ulic-w-warszawie/111266

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150753118
map per (2024-03-21 20:48:12+00:00): Hallo UKausch,

warum ist Little by Little hier absichtlich doppelt eingezeichnet?
UKausch (2024-03-22 18:29:22+00:00): Weil es genau genommen zwei getrennte Ladenlokale sind die jeweils über einen eigenen Eingang verfügen.
map per (2024-03-22 22:03:04+00:00): Ok, aber es doppelt einzutragen ist eher verwirrend und keine gute Lösung wenn beides zusammen gehört. Ich würde eher eine Node in der Mitte eintragen.
Andere Sachen (z.B. Krankenhäuser) werden ja auch nicht doppelt eingetragen, nur weil sie z.B. aus mehreren Gebäude bestehen.
Yunkers (2024-04-01 15:05:10+00:00): Strona na Wikipedii która jest podana w źródłach jasno wskazuje nazwę "Officers' Żoliborz".
marczoutendijk (2024-03-22 15:00:57+00:00): The huge area in this edit is a mistake!
Marek-M (2024-03-23 20:22:12+00:00): Proszę Cię o upraszczanie geometrii dróg. W jakim celu tak zagęszczasz punkty na praktycznie prostych liniach highway?

Lekkie łuki też można tworzyć z mniejszą liczbą węzłów. Na renderingu i w nawigacjach i tak nie zobaczysz takich szczegółów a aplikacje każdy taki węzeł muszą przeliczać przy routingu.
eggie (2024-03-21 19:57:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution. 

Greetz,
eggie
Messinian (2024-03-21 20:05:54+00:00): Hi ManDam, Thanks for your contribution to OSM!   O took a look a look at your changeset and have a few comments for you.

It's best to try to map buildings separately unless it is very clear that they are connected. I noted a few examples where you have mapped multiple buildings with one closed way (area).

You can also make sure the buildings with 90 degree corners are square by selecting the item and hitting the Q key.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148983555
mikkolukas (2024-03-23 08:57:09+00:00): Pas på med din mapping!

Du lægger gangstier oveni cykelstier, selvom cykelstien allerede *er* angivet som en fællessti for fodgængere og cyklister.

For eksempel denne her:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1264961169

---

Din forlængelse af denne her:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292710525

.. er også et problem. Både fordi den lægger sig oveni en eksisterende sti (samme problem som ovenfor) og fordi man normalt ikke mapper fortove på dén måde.

Når et fortov er i direkte tilknytning til en vej, så undlader man at tegne fortovet for sig selv. I stedet tilføjer man bare et tag til vejen, som for eksempel `sidewalk=right`

Du kan læse mere her: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk

---

By the way, velkommen til OpenStreetMap-communitiet. Håber ikke det har skræmt dig alt for meget ;)
mikkolukas (2024-03-23 08:57:29+00:00): Hvis du gerne vil have hjælp til at få det rettet, så sig endelig til :)
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-14 17:33:57+00:00): Was the sidewalk on this street removed entirely?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148985211
map per (2024-03-21 20:44:16+00:00): Hallo UKausch, 

die Bayerische Akademie der Schönen Künste ist hier jetzt als Kunstwerk eingezeichnet
UKausch (2024-03-22 18:57:39+00:00): Hallo map per,
so wie es vor meiner Änderung schon eingetragen war.
Es ist mir auch etwas eigenartig vorgekommen.  An der "Akademie der Künste" in Berlin [1] orientiert, habe ich ein "amenity=arts_centre" daraus gemacht.  Das sollte am ehesten passen.
Servus
Uwe

[1] https://osm.org/way/237816189
map per (2024-03-22 21:56:01+00:00): amenity=arts_centre hört sich gut an. Ich vermute mal, dass das "fixme=Tagging?" eingetragen war, weil die Akademie kein Kunstwerk ist.
pitscheplatsch (2024-03-23 15:08:08+00:00): Just a test?
pitscheplatsch (2024-03-23 15:09:58+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149038944
blackboxlogic (2024-03-22 18:57:17+00:00): It looks like you might be having trouble connecting pettingill st to the south-bound main st. I've added that connection in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149027397

Respond here if that wasn't helpful or if you have questions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148985696
pitscheplatsch (2024-03-23 15:10:02+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149038944
francians (2024-03-23 07:22:36+00:00): Ciao,

come ti avevo già detto lo scorso anno (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132417251), i nomi dei percorsi MTB non vanno sul tag name. Io ti ringrazio per il fatto che li mantieni, ma ricorda di usare l'attributo corretto (mtb:name).
Francesco
Palex63 (2024-03-23 07:37:21+00:00): Scusa,ma non ho capito dove dovrei mettere il nome dei sentieri.O devo aggiungere solo mtb davanti al nome?
francians (2024-03-23 17:43:32+00:00): Quando vuoi aggiungere un nome che non è ancora indicato, clicca su "Aggiungi un tag" (tasto +) e nella chiave (a sx) ci scrivi "mtb:name" (senza doppi apici) e nel valore (a dx) scrivi il nome senza MTB.
Tieni a mente che i nomi non si visualizzeranno più sul sito OpenStreetMap.org, ma l'informazione è presente nel database e se una app è predisposta per leggerlo saprà che si tratta di un percorso per MountainBike
francians (2024-03-23 17:44:40+00:00): Quando si tratta invece di un sentiero, se è un nome ufficiale, tipo "Sentiero degli Dei", allora mettilo pure nel name.
Grazie e buona serata
danieldegroot2 (2024-03-22 13:45:06+00:00): Hey Dynamene,

I have reverted the modification of the name tag. The signage differs between segments of this road and is already properly tagged. You can check this by going into the editor, choosing on the right the button under the layer menu (data menu) and enabling Mapillary street level imagery.

Regards,

Daniel

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149014425
LudovicG (2025-05-16 16:07:02+00:00): Bonjour,
Habitant le quartier, je n'ai jamais vu un commerce ici.
D'après GSV, il n'y a effectivement rien depuis 2008.
A partir de quel moment, peut-on conclure que ça a basculé en résidentiel (ou pas) ?
On a le cas dans le quartier au 3 rue Jolivet (vitrine conservée mais "planchisé" et habité depuis peu)
On a aussi le 55 rue de la Fuye ...
stevea (2024-03-21 21:15:08+00:00): Nice!
eggie (2024-03-21 21:43:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Metzor (2024-03-22 05:18:46+00:00): Hi varvar8

A friendly reminder: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Metzor
mcliquid (2024-03-22 06:27:01+00:00): @Metzor: FYI, I have already reported this user to the DWG as this user has never responded to my changeset comments.
Metzor (2024-03-22 06:41:19+00:00): Danke!
VARVAR8 (2024-03-25 16:31:41+00:00): Hi Metzor
Thanks for the reminder. I apologize for this mistake. I made sure to send my changes before moving on to mapping to another country.
I will try to prevent this from happening in the future. Happy mapping!
KKS (2024-04-01 11:47:09+00:00): Знов ти фігні наробив.
Для чого ти займаєшся шквідництвом? Мапа має допомагати, а не вводити в оману. Ти не досліджуєш місцевість на яву, включаєш комп, включаєш свою фантазію і починаєш марити. Зав'язуй.
Валентин Ян (2024-04-01 17:34:36+00:00): Не хаміть. Тут майже усі зміни досліджені вживу, в чому проблема?
KKS (2024-04-02 13:12:38+00:00): Пішохідні стежки через паркан- це дуже "вживу досліджено"
tekim (2024-03-25 22:32:15+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Thanks for editing the map.  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to used Google Maps, Google Earth, or Google Street View when editing OpenStreetMap due to Google's terms of use.
DUGA (2024-05-05 19:39:41+00:00): Wellsites cannot be mapped like that.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1264984976#map=18/41.89794/-75.68804
Messinian (2024-05-06 07:35:41+00:00): Yes, I clearly forgot the primary tags for the well site on that one. Thanks for fixing it.
mueschel (2024-03-23 09:44:38+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
I see that you added many tags like these:

edificio progettato = si
elementi identitari = /
servizi presenti = Bar
stato edificio = Buono
tipo di copertura = Piano
valore storico = no

In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please make sure that you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.

If you have questions, please feel free to ask in the forums!

PS: It looks like you're working in a group with other mappers. Please point your supervisor / group leader to our organized editing guidelines:
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
ivanbranco (2024-03-23 13:43:33+00:00): Ciao Clefbo, questo e altri tuoi changeset sono stati annullati per ripristinare la situazione precedente. La motivazione é che le linee guida per gli import ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ) e quelle per le modifiche di gruppo ( https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines ) non sono state rispettate. Per favore seguite le linee guida prima di procedere con ulteriori modifiche.
DaveF (2024-05-03 08:37:18+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3663368461
What is the reason you've amended the network of this London underground station to 	National Rail?
RailwayFan8 (2024-05-03 15:56:40+00:00): That was a mistake that I must've missed. Corrected now.
lakedistrict (2024-03-21 21:59:24+00:00): Hi, thanks for all your ongoing edits. To help other local mappers understand what has been changed and where, please provide more detailed changeset comments such as "added to details to garden centre, Ambleside". Happy mapping, and any queries just ask. :)
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
eggie (2024-03-22 06:52:49+00:00): Dag Gret... leisure=park is een functie en geen landuse.Je kun de landuse laten betsaan en over het geheel een leisure=park (functie)  leggen, maar dat was hier al het geval. Wijkpark De Verademing.
De landuse heb ik hersteld.
MVG
eggie
Lumikeiju (2024-03-21 22:35:19+00:00): I have reverted the parts of this changeset (see Changeset: 148988574) related to the residential landuse area edit (Way: 1221616810 and Way: 712371245) which mistakenly kept the wrong history, and re-added the intended fix (see Changeset: 148988646).
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
eggie (2024-03-22 06:49:21+00:00): Dag Gretkatillor   
Zouden de Kindergarten en de adressen ook verwijderd kunnen worden?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-03-22 08:34:20+00:00): Verwijderd.
De sloop is nog in volle gang
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=22-03-2023&loc=52.07455%2C4.286688%2C20z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2024-03-18&acqid=20240318_105324_PNEO-04_1_1&sensor=Pleiades-NEO
eggie (2024-03-22 11:22:05+00:00): De adressen dus..
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
Glassman (2024-03-22 16:34:35+00:00): I think you want highway=path or highway=footway. A path is what we call a trail while a footway is more line a sidewalk.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148988541
Vivekvbajpai (2024-03-22 16:54:56+00:00): Updated in a different changeset. Thank you for your comment.
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
Supaplex030 (2024-03-26 09:10:41+00:00): Hallo kjon,
du hast hier einige Gebäude gelöscht, die nur ein Stockwerk haben und daher auf Luftbildern oft nicht gut erkennbar sind. Bist du sicher, dass diese nicht mehr existieren? Auf den ersten Blick habe ich ein paar entdeckt, die sich zumindest auf dem aktuellsten Luftbild erkennen lassen z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/822840812.

lg, Alex
kjon (2024-03-28 16:11:39+00:00): Hallo Alex,
mein Fehler, ich habe das Gebäude wieder ergänzt. Danke für den Hinweis.
LG, kjon
Glassman (2024-03-22 16:36:15+00:00): These streets look more like highway=service + service=driveway. Can you review this edit
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148988723
Vivekvbajpai (2024-03-22 16:53:07+00:00): The Satellite image is from before the construction, but now they are paved public roads maintained by City (not driveways).
Glassman (2024-03-22 17:03:28+00:00): Check out the counties online parcel map. https://scopi.snoco.org/ These are likely owned by the HOA. The houses around the streets seem to carry the same address as the existing roads. You obviously know the area better than me so if you think they are named streets, then according to the county, they would be named 121st Avenue Southeast and 122nd Avenue Southeast. I do tend to tag these as highway=service when I see them.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148988723
Vivekvbajpai (2024-03-22 17:13:32+00:00): That is possible. They might have continued using the same street name but not owned by City. I updated them in this change request (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149023398).
Thank you.
Glassman (2024-03-22 17:16:51+00:00): Thanks for following up. Mapping is OSM is fun, but there are so many different ways to tag features that it can be difficult.
Vivekvbajpai (2024-03-22 17:19:33+00:00): Thank you for your guidance. I definitely have a lot to learn.
Glassman (2024-03-22 16:37:00+00:00): #TIP: we spell out street names in OSM. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148988757
Vivekvbajpai (2024-03-22 16:46:35+00:00): Thanks for the review. I created another changeset with full names.
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
Xvtn (2024-03-22 14:25:11+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your recent changes here. Everything looks great overall! Here are a couple of suggestions:
- highway=pedestrian is typically used for wide walkways that are sort of arteries for foot traffic (such as on a university campus.) In this case, I think highway=path and informal=yes would be best. (Your editor may show that as "Informal Path". The reason I think so is that it looks like this is a small foot path that isn't officially maintained.
- In OSM, we generally want to avoid abbreviations. That's because it's easy for computers to shorten a word (place -> pl.) but there can be some problems when doing the opposite.

Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contributions!! :)
Vivekvbajpai (2024-03-22 16:36:36+00:00): Hi! Thank you for your comments. I will push the corrections.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-21 22:40:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11751713987

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
BrackoNe (2024-03-23 22:09:37+00:00): Bojane, molim te da ostavljaš ćirilična imena kao osnovna (u "name" atributu), a dodaj name:sr-Latn ukoliko želiš da dodaš i latinični naziv. Takođe te molim da ne dodaješ duplirane tačke od interesa.

Hvala unapred!
Bojan Mitrović (2024-03-23 22:25:42+00:00): Hvala na komentaru, nisam uspeo da nadjem sr-latn ili bar kroz aplikaciju Organic maps, ne postoji kao opcija... A što se tiče dupliranih tačaka, jedino ako je bio problem pri login-u, jer posle login-a nisu izašle te tačke, pa ponovio, pa je pretpostavljam dva puta učitalo izmene... U svakom slučaju, hvala što si mi skrenuo pažnju, trudiću se da ne pravim takve greške, pozdrav!
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269