piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisRevert (2026-04-14 22:33:13+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181343557
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
Dodko (2026-04-07 14:28:54+00:00): čo je tu za žeriav?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13712462955
Dodko (2026-04-07 14:31:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13712476098

bocianie hniezdo sa nepíše do ref ale má svoje značky

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:birds_nest%3Dstork
Alex8581 (2026-04-08 15:57:22+00:00): áno kvôli stavbe mostu sú tu 2 mobilné žeriavy, nie sú možno presne na tom mieste ako som zaznačil, ale nachádzajú sa tam
Alex8581 (2026-04-08 16:04:59+00:00): no tak nemalo svoju značku tak som to dal takto no bože
Dodko (2026-04-08 18:29:37+00:00): Prečítaj si dokumentáciu, nepoužíva sa to na dočasný stavebný žeriav
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:man_made%3Dcrane
Frans S (2026-04-13 09:30:45+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please do not include the shadow of a building in your mapping; it is no part of a building and is showing a thick line on the shadow side of a building.
It also shows the dimension of that part.
Best regards
Koffieboer (2026-04-17 17:41:48+00:00): Pad komt nu naar boven op publieke kaart en dat lijkt me onjuist. access=agricultural, enige in hele omgeving? moet er niet iets bij dat het publiek uitsluit?
OttoR (2026-04-17 20:20:57+00:00): Ik heb in principe overgenomen wat als attribuut al op het pad stond/ wat bij aansluitende paden stond. Als dat verkeerd is, voel je vrij om het aan te passen. Ik ben niet ter plaatse geweest. 

Met name uitgelijnd obv BGT, PDOK en beelden van de straat foto’s van de Gemeente Amsterdam.
Koffieboer (2026-04-18 10:52:20+00:00): Ok. Ik ben meerdere keren ter plaatse geweest, liergouw en o.a. laatst nog (binnenkant van) die ringsloot gelopen. Maar ben geen expert op gebied van tags. Mijn research verder: eigendom/bestemming indiceert boer/agri, diverse vergelijkbare paden/weggetjes in buurt op access=private, lijkt nu omhoog te komen doordat node verbonden is geraakt met netwerk, foto's op hek tonen af en toe een bordje of slot maar sowieso nergens in deze buurt borden in lijn met juridische realiteit dus dat is geen hulp. 

Ik weet niet wat consistent is, access=private of pad of wellicht op de node met barrier=gate, want onduidelijk voor mij waarom access=agri is gekozen hier, dusss even denken

I'm pretty sure dat ik hier niet welkom ben
OttoR (2026-04-18 21:11:02+00:00): Ik weet niet op welk pad/track je precies doelt. Mijn edit bevatte >1000 nodes. :-)

Wat ik wel gevonden heb is dat het Durgerdampad van Staatsbosbeheer normaliter al gesloten is tijdens het broedseizoen van 15 maart t/m 15 juni. Maar nu überhaupt tijdelijk afgesloten door beheerproblemen.

https://www.staatsbosbeheer.nl/uit-in-de-natuur/wandelpad-durgerdam
eggie (2026-04-07 07:55:16+00:00): Hoi,

Kan er wel mee leven, maar de vorige tagging was niet echt fout.
Renderen doet het niet ideaal.
De naam is nu verdwenen van de kaart.
museum:type = open_air zie ik nog als proposed in de status. 
Wellicht dat voorgaande mappers liever tourism=theme_park op de kaart hadden. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-07 08:02:20+00:00): Ik denk dat medemappers wel eens bezwaar zouden kunnen maken betreffende deze aanpassing. 
In zo'n geval neem ik contact op met de voorgaande mapper.
Gr eggie
Tomas09 (2026-04-06 22:13:13+00:00): Requested help since i mightve messed some things up with multypolygons
Jordi MF (2026-04-06 23:40:41+00:00): Tranquilo, parece que no hay ningún multipolígono erróneo. 

A parte de eso, creo que tengo una opinión diferente a la tuya sobre qué es un "scrub". Por ejemplo, esta zona (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1496797637/) yo no la mapearía como "scrub" porque no se ven matorrales o arbustos altos que dificulten andar. Parece que abundan la hierba ("natural=grassland") o la plantas leñosas pequeñas ("natural=heath") qu permiten andar por esa zona.

Es lo que yo creo. Sin nada más que aportar, te doy las gracias por mejorar esta zona. Saludos!
NeisBot (2026-04-06 22:46:23+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, oaia neagra.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added address details, including house number, postcode, street, and city, to a building with 5 levels"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
MxxCon (2026-04-07 12:24:16+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit?
If this relation is not up to the specs of PTv2, rather than downgrading its version, it's better to correct it to be up to the spec of the current version.

Having said that, I'm not sure if this relation is needed at all. BM5 line has only 2 routes, and they are already mapped in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20411634 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20320063
MacLondon (2026-04-10 02:18:07+00:00): Hi,
It takes a bit of effort to make a route relation into (usually) 2 PTv2 relations - one for each direction of the route. It also need knowledge of where each direction of a route begins + ends.

The relation doesn't need to perfect, but there should at least be some degree of effort to 'convert' the route relation before (mis)tagging it as being PTv2.

Routes do need ongoing maintenance on OSM due to introduction of gaps/errors. One of the advantages of PTv2 is with identifying routes that need (often only minor attention) using e.g. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=-73.93171&lat=40.71787&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways

Currently with OSM Inspector the QM15 route demonstrates how one relation mistagged as PTv2 can pollute the map. If a large number of routes were similarly mistagged, it would made this valuable OSM Inspector tool into 'finding needles in haystacks'.

Ideally all bus/train routes would be converted to PTv2, but only those that have been converted should be tagged as PTv2. Improvements can be made later.

(Some bus routes can have different variants that require separate relations, so it is possible that the BM5 line does need more than 2 relations.)
MxxCon (2026-04-10 02:28:42+00:00): According to the official MTA GTFS feed, BM5 line has only 2 routes 😏.
If you watched NYC's changeset feed, you've seen I've been spending a ton of time massaging bus lines into a proper shape... Adding and updating bus stops and routes with proper tags. So far I've been doing just Brooklyn since I'm most familiar with my boro. But I do know that Queens and the Bronx will require a lot of work to get them updated. 
I've been using https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/US/NY/US-NY-MTA-Analysis.html and going one route at a time. (Overpass server errers haven't been helping either 😞)
MacLondon (2026-04-10 12:01:26+00:00): Yes, it does look like the BM5 line only needs 2 relations.

Bus routes in NYC have definitely needed some attention as in general not many bus stops have been added to route relations. (Like most of the world, I suspect a lot of routes are also over-mapped beyond where the route actually starts or ends.)

The one big advantage with having ALL public transport routes converted (properly) to PTv2 is not having to worry about foward/backward roles - a benefit for all OSM mapper.

If for example a junction gets remapped, it can get very confusing if there's a mix of routes on a section of road where some routes need a role set to forward, some need backward and others (including all PTv2 relations) should have neither.

It becomes much easier to identify gaps introduced into valid PTv2 bus routes as OSM Inspector highlights them as invalid. However there are other causes for an 'invalid' route, including bus routes in the wrong order.

Non-PTv2 routes would be almost impossible to keep accurate in NYC.
MxxCon (2026-04-10 12:42:50+00:00): After I go through a given route's stops, I just use https://relatify.monicz.dev to add them and ways into that route relation and the app takes care of putting everything in the correct order :)
NeisBot (2026-04-06 22:51:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/548661536 v12 | 8 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180972028
NeisBot (2026-04-06 23:06:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/548661536 v12 | 8 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13712569118 v2
https://osm.org/node/13712569117 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180972316
eggie (2026-04-07 07:44:05+00:00): Dag Marcel,

Die fout zie ik overal. Dan lijkt het me nuttig om ook de rest aan te passen?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-07 07:46:36+00:00): De rest van de straat ook aangepast
Wildsharky (2026-04-08 04:04:17+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180977903
Dodko (2026-04-07 14:02:32+00:00): To že je bunker opustený sa nepíše do názvu, zahraničné aplikácie to nepoznajú ale do značiek
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:military%3Dbunker
rajdhani (2026-04-08 04:02:01+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181028386
ScrawnyMeowth1 (2026-04-07 02:44:22+00:00): There's no reason to remove "unnecessary" data if it's correctly mapped. All good data is useful, even if it's just to make the map prettier.
eggie (2026-04-07 07:40:51+00:00): Tip Eigenlijk zijn dit geen parkeerterreinen.
Ze worden dan als volgt getagd.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side

Ik heb het aangepast. De P wordt dan ook minder prominent.
MVG
eggie
Glassman (2026-04-07 23:58:46+00:00): A tag describing the type of facility is needed. I added amenity=social_facillity. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:social_facility. It that isn't accurate can you add a better one?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180973393
HerryCFPL (2026-04-07 13:29:36+00:00): 哇，大佬又来画阳泉了
Higashimado (2026-04-07 19:03:07+00:00): 哪里哪里，这儿您是前辈 😂
要是哪儿标错了还请您提醒呢，毕竟我完全是云（
ajmat (2026-04-08 17:08:23+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 181060838
rajdhani (2026-04-08 09:23:31+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181038541
Udarian (2026-04-07 20:34:48+00:00): I checked the position of this ALPR on several aerial imagery in iD and on all of them it is within the road area in such a way that the current position is highly unlikely. Please double check its position and fix it. 

Happy mapping,
Udar.
vaibhavnz (2026-04-07 05:38:43+00:00): Cool it a little. It’s an edit from half a decade ago.
NeisBot (2026-04-07 03:39:58+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13712857665 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Skid Steer Attachments"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-15 04:33:12+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181348880
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
FajrAl (2026-04-07 05:28:23+00:00): dalam Openstreetmap, nama jalan menggunakan nama lengkap dan bukan disingkat. Jadi: "Jalan Wijaya Kusuma." Begitu juga dengan yang lain seperti gang.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180976606
NeisBot (2026-04-07 04:06:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13712857665 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Skid steer attachments store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-15 04:33:15+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/181348880
NeisBot (2026-04-07 04:18:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1497237185 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Alambique de cachaça"
---
Por exemplo, uma versão mais neutra e factual do seu texto poderia ser: "Alambique de cachaça"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-15 04:33:19+00:00): 🤔 The text has been updated, though I’m not entirely sure it’s an improvement.
literan (2026-04-08 19:55:51+00:00): пекарня называется SeDelice

French Bakery это описание, текст с вывески, как КНИЖНЫЙ МАГАЗИН

откачу
MrBrightsideTK (2026-04-14 08:26:28+00:00): Понял, спасибо
NeisBot (2026-04-07 04:33:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13712919372 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Physical therapy clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-15 10:33:06+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181359723
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Wildsharky (2026-04-08 04:11:58+00:00): Revert of 180951802
Hung Tran 9x0 (2026-05-14 00:57:06+00:00): Nút giao này đã chuyển thành vòng xuyến từ lâu rồi. Việc bạn xoá vòng xuyến là hoàn toàn không đúng thực tế và làm việc điều hướng qua đây không chính xác.
Hung Tran 9x0 (2026-05-14 00:57:41+00:00): Đề nghị bạn khôi phục lại vòng xuyến và sửa các tuyến xe theo vòng xuyến.
Hung Tran 9x0 (2026-05-14 04:38:24+00:00): có vẻ như bạn chưa online, vậy tôi xin phép khôi phục lại vòng xuyến nhé.
Wildsharky (2026-04-08 04:14:10+00:00): Revert of 180960619
Karlheinz Gierling (2026-04-07 06:15:51+00:00): This is a ducumeted German name of the street and still in use. Please keep.
ajmat (2026-05-12 05:29:36+00:00): Hi
Karlheinz Gierling
Thanks for reaching out. I could not locate a source for name:de=Steingasse. Could  you share a source for the name reference?
It will help us to update OSM.
Thank you.
NeisBot (2026-04-07 05:33:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13712971810 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Smoke shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-07 10:33:19+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 01:50:11+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and explicit source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184205252

https://osm.org/changeset/184205252
aceman444 (2026-04-09 20:38:51+00:00): Zdravim, preco davate znacky traffic_signals:* na cestu a nie na semafor? Ano da sa aj na obe ak velmi chcete, ale primarne nech su na bode semaforu. A hlavne nech si neodporuju, ako napriklad:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1495880245
a
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13137563874
NeisBot (2026-04-07 05:48:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13712977515 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Real Estate Office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-15 10:33:11+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181359724
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-04-07 05:51:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13712982311 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dental studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-15 10:33:14+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/181024418
NeisBot (2026-04-07 06:00:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/566392696 v4 | 7 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/11961546984 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180979359
iandees (2026-04-07 13:24:24+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11961546984 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180998999, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Kuues Planeet (2026-04-07 08:31:28+00:00): Hi. Still dont see the edit I made on the map. Could You please advise what am I doing wrong ?
MappingMore (2026-04-28 06:36:12+00:00): Hi Kuues Planeet , Thank you for contributing on OSM and reaching out to me. You have added only address and name tag on the POI and missed to add the primary descriptive tag which is mandatory. For the feature to be visible with the correct symbology, a definitive tag is required (i.e. shop=*). You can refer to the OSM wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop which would be helpful to identify your business. Happy mapping!!
eggie (2026-04-07 07:37:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Die tag heeft de hoofdtag nodig.. entrance=exit
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:exit%3Demergency

Zo doet de tag niets in OSM.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-07 08:10:58+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast. Check even of de entrance=exit op de juiste plaats zit. De node moet verbonden zijn met de gebouwomtrek.
CTRL-F5 voor het effect.
Gr eggie
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Wildsharky (2026-04-13 10:56:30+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181079415
WaffleR_zero (2026-04-07 07:07:32+00:00): Hello jugs1135!

Welcome to OpenStreetMap, it seems that you are new to editing, I'm just telling you that you shouldn't delete the college area.
Timmy_Tesseract (2026-04-07 23:51:25+00:00): Accidentally deleted objects restored in changeset/181024216
BaboucheVerte (2026-05-18 04:10:06+00:00): Hi, 

There are really no railway crossing here between the underpass to cross the street and the subway railway station ...

Please don't add tag asked by iD just to resolve warning.

fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182810594
Timmy_Tesseract (2026-04-08 01:50:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits!

Indoor mapping is quite complicated, if you plan to do more of it I would recommend having a look at this guide on the OSM wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging

Some basic things to consider:
- highway=footway for outdoor ways, highway=corridor for indoor ways
- name tag is only for actual names, not descriptions
- building parts and rooms that share physical walls should also be connected in OSM

If you would like to get in touch with fellow local mappers, here's a list of channels maintained by the OSM PH community: osm.org/wiki/PH