piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
porfiriopaiz (2025-10-24 00:46:34+00:00): 

Hola J00SECI,

¿Podrías indicarme qué fuente de información has consultado al momento de realizar los cambios de las etiquetas de los elementos que has modificado en este conjunto de cambios?

Quiero hacer la observación de que estos elementos fueron originalmente agregados por contribuidores profesionales que en su momento han citado las fuentes de información en las cuales se han basado sus contribuciones.

¿Podrías hacer lo mismo?

Entretanto, podrías abstenerte de modificar sin fundamento alguno las contribuciones hechas por otros voluntarios.

Únicamente estás entorpeciendo el trabajo que ya han realizado.

Atentamente,
Porfirio Páiz
eggie (2025-10-22 21:04:35+00:00): Dag Renee   Het is niet correct om die doorgaande wegen te degraderen tot de laagste categorie residential.
Ook al zijn het woonstraten kunnen die een hogere klasse krijgen.
Dat heb je op andere plaatsen wel gedaan. 

Het zit nu niet meer logisch in elkaar.
De Bleijerheiderstraat  klopt dus niet hier.

De voorgaande mapper is een zeer ervaren mapper. Heb je daar contact mee opgenomen?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-22 21:05:08+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=173645938
eggie (2025-10-22 21:06:58+00:00): De Ailbertuslaan zit ook niet logisch en consistent in elkaar. secondary afgewisseld met residential.
eggie (2025-10-22 21:12:15+00:00): Ailbertuslaan  consistent gemaakt net als 
Bleijerheiderstraat.
We hebben geen wisselende stukken op zo'n traject.
MVG
eggie
mueschel (2025-10-26 10:18:16+00:00): Hi,
what's wrong with this relation, apart from not being complete? It might be better to have it in a usable state instead of prefixing every key with an undocumented "incomplete".
porfiriopaiz (2025-10-23 04:26:37+00:00): Hola J00SECI,

¿Podrías indicarme qué fuente de información has consultado al momento de realizar los cambios de las etiquetas de los elementos que has modificado en este conjunto de cambios?

Quiero hacer la observación de que estos elementos fueron originalmente agregados por contribuidores profesionales que en su momento han citado las fuentes de información en las cuales se han basado sus contribuciones.

¿Podrías hacer lo mismo?

Entretanto, podrías abstenerte de modificar sin fundamento alguno las contribuciones hechas por otros voluntarios.

Únicamente estás entorpeciendo el trabajo que ya han realizado.

Atentamente,
Porfirio Páiz
user_5359 (2025-10-25 08:08:23+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/344502710. What is the mean of the tag 12 = 10?
kasmar00 (2025-10-25 08:16:34+00:00): Hi, sorry that was meant to be "railway:track_ref" with either 10 or 12 (can't remember right now), I must have misclicked when changing the tag. Feel free to delete the 12=10 (as it's not a passenger stop serving track) or I'll fix that later this weekend.
user_5359 (2025-10-25 08:23:23+00:00): changed to railway:track_ref=12 (10 exists near by)
kasmar00 (2025-10-25 08:46:46+00:00): Thanks, that make sense and that must have been what I wanted to do.
NeisBot (2025-10-22 20:46:27+00:00): Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added commercial building"
NeisBot (2025-10-22 20:46:27+00:00): Hi Menna_Ammar, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
Fraxi (2025-10-22 21:13:10+00:00): За n11083480722 трябваше ли да сложиш и count=3? Или само за 2 от един цвят и 1 от друг? Защото се сетих за подобни.
Dimitar155 (2025-10-23 09:29:22+00:00): Всъщност не е лоша идея. Получава се като при пътищата с lanes = lanes:forward + lanes:backward. Току-що го добавих, благодаря за коментара.
Fraxi (2025-10-23 09:37:25+00:00): И аз впоследствие добавих 3 броя(общо) и съответно 2 жълти и 1 зелен:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173648104#map=18/42.665967/23.281837
Идеята беше дали count=* не се явяваше излишно(като са тагнати 2+1 с count:color)? Извинявай, че тук коментирам
Dimitar155 (2025-10-23 15:47:00+00:00): Тук е по-удобно ако е за конкретна промяна.

По-скоро не е излишно, понеже ясно казваш че действително са 3 и не си изпуснал случайно някой с друг цвт.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-14 21:52:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1444037139/history - skąd te plany?
Las Wolski (2025-11-15 23:16:15+00:00): highway=proposed dotyczy wielu odcinków dróg położonych obok siebie i dodanych w tym changesecie:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1444037139
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1444037140
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1444037141
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1444037142
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1444037143
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1444037144
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1444037145
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1444037146
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1444037147
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1444037148
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1444037149
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1444037150
Znam tę okolicę. W terenie nie widać niczego, co by miało wskazywać na jakąkolwiek przebudowę drogi prowadzącą do powstania zmapowanych dróg.
Las Wolski (2025-11-16 22:01:08+00:00): Pytanie: Czy ma sens mapowanie podanych powyżej odcinków highway=proposed ?
a) w terenie nie ma żadnego śladu świadczącego o przebudowie, 
b) bzzzkrk nie podał żadnych źródeł, z których wynikałoby, że taka budowa dróg jest planowana i żadnych informacji, że taki projekt - o ile istnieje - jest realny, kiedy konkretnie miałby nastąpić. 
Dlatego proponuję usunięcie tych odcinków z mapy.
maaxy_ (2025-11-17 20:54:19+00:00): Istnieje.
www.transport-publiczny.pl/wiadomosci/krakow-wybral-wykonawce-wezla-bronowice-67194.html
https://www.krakow.pl/aktualnosci/216332,1912,komunikat,wezel_przesiadkowy_w_bronowicach_najlepiej_przygotowana_inwestycja.html
https://www.facebook.com/zdmk.krakow/posts/coraz-bli%C5%BCej-budowy-parkingu-pr-w-bronowicach-pod-koniec-wrze%C5%9Bnia-otworzymy-ofer/1217967450135483/
Z tego co widze to changeset uwzględnia taki układ drogowy, jaki jest na wizualizacjach.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-18 08:13:03+00:00): I niestety widać efekty: https://dziennikpolski24.pl/wielka-wycinka-w-centrum-bronowic-z-krajobrazu-zniknelo-50-dorodnych-drzew-powstanie-wielki-dworzec-dla-polnocno-zachodniej-czesci-krakowa/ar/c1p2-28176885
maaxy_ (2025-11-18 12:23:50+00:00): To są te drzewa które zakrywały garaże pomiędzy planowanym parkingiem a przystankiem?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-18 12:50:02+00:00): nie wiem
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-18 12:51:13+00:00): a, najwyraźniej tak: widać na zdjęciu
Las Wolski (2025-12-09 16:49:08+00:00): Wycięto drzewa na południe od garaży. Byłem tam dzisiaj. Na OSM było zmapowanych ponad 30 drzew. Już ich nie ma. Uaktualniłem OSM.
bxl-forever (2025-10-22 22:49:27+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thanks for updating the map.

A word of caution: it is a very bad idea to destroy information.  If a business closes, the recommended practice is to remove the related tags from the object… but keep it on the map.  It will disappear from the public map but will be available to be re-used once a new is active there.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

You seem to have inadvertently erased a former restaurant on nbr 44.  I managed to restore it from backups.  Same for a business in Dilbeek in your other edit.

Hope this helps.  Happy mapping!
valakai (2025-10-23 05:58:01+00:00): Hello bxl-forever. 
Thanks for the tips and help. I will be careful next time. 

Happy day.
kadiwa (2026-06-29 15:20:57+00:00): You forgot two little segments right here: node/261118314
nickvet419 (2026-06-29 16:51:05+00:00): woops.. hate when I do that... fixed.. thanks
NieWnen (2025-10-23 00:16:24+00:00): Please:
- do not remove addresses if they are still visible on the Geoportal address layer or added from another verifiable source
- change `source:building`/`source:geometry` or other source tag if you are changing shape or tags
- do not align to Bing – it is not primary imagery in Poland. Geoportal Ortophotmap is. The Bing imagery is also slightly offset. For buildings, we use EGiB (Ewidencja Gruntów i Budynków) overlay.
kapazao (2026-01-07 08:17:41+00:00): Hola, he visto que cambiaste varios caminos a carreteras en esta zona.

En España para OSM las carreteras solo deberían usarse para comunicar poblaciones o lugares realmente importantes. Suelen estar pavimentadas y tener señalización y marcas viales.

Ver: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway=track
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway=unclassified
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/highways-unclassified-vs-track/121443

En estos casos, salvo la vía "Carretera de Padules", que une poblaciones, no parecen cumplir ninguna de esas cuestiones y serían más bien caminos. 
Si tienes algún dato que diga lo contrario estaría bien conocerlo.

Un saludo
itrivi (2026-01-07 08:26:02+00:00): No conocía ese requisito de unir poblaciones. Simplemente, antes de mi cambio estaba ese camino señalado como carretera por tramos, y yo lo unifiqué. Si no debe ser marcado como carretera, sino como carril forestal, pues adelante, no le veo problema. 
Gracias por la información.
democat (2025-10-22 21:52:55+00:00): Hey there! Why did you remove the tags on the stopping positions for 
TM at the DFW Airport Terminal B station? Seems like the Silver 
Line should get added to the rail on the right instead.
نصرقائداحمدالهلالي (2025-10-22 21:41:04+00:00): قرية ضريبة العرش. منطقة رداع. محافظة البيضاء. اليمن.
ricaestevao (2025-10-24 23:10:43+00:00): o Bretas Em Minas Gerais Foi Vendido Para O Supermercados BH. A rede Supermercados BH comprou todas as operações do Bretas em Minas Gerais do grupo chileno Cencosud em fevereiro de 2025, por R$ 716 milhões
eggie (2025-10-23 06:02:31+00:00): Dag resitive..  Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.

MVG
eggie
resitive (2025-10-24 19:31:57+00:00): Ha eggie, bedankt voor de oplettenheid
user_5359 (2025-10-24 11:09:52+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/632398892. What is the mean of the tag 下がるheight = 34?
TranslatorPS (2025-10-24 11:16:54+00:00): Hi, thanks, it means that the Japanese IME keyboard got wonky and I didn't spot that the last word of description got duplicated in the next line when editing. I've now also fixed w175558574 like in the other changeset you managed to comment in those few minutes.
Thanks for standing on the vanguard of stupid mistakes!
Jacopo (2025-12-09 11:26:36+00:00): Ciao
I see that you uploaded several historical tracks around Verona.
You used the tag railway=abandoned but in several instance there are no physical indication of a rail so maybe railway=razed might be more appropriate?
AwFi (2025-12-10 11:53:00+00:00): Hi there, 
The use of railway=abandoned is not suitable for this kind of mapping as there are no leftovers of the railway an neither any other feature that could be associated (please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Demolished_railways).
This stuff is better to be mapped on openhitoricalmap, but I guess you know it given your profile description.
Paschberg (2025-12-10 19:49:36+00:00): Hallo Jacopo & AwFi
I have changed  those lines into railway=razed
And I trie to correct such lines from now on anywhere. As now "razed" is rendered in Open Railwaymap. Some years ago the rendering of "razed" didnt work in Open Railway Map. I have mapped some railway lines in abandoned although the were actually razed. I will correct them bit by bit.
AwFi (2025-12-10 20:24:27+00:00): Hi, 
railway=razed is not correct either, the only correct way of mapping it is on openhistoricalmap. On https://openrailwaymap.app it's also possible to visualise data from OHM sing the slider on top right.
there are also ways to directly move your edits to OHM, please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nonexistent_features#Transferring_a_feature_from_OpenStreetMap_to_OpenHistoricalMap
Last thing, please don map for the rendering and if there are no traces left, please don't map it on openstreetmap. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground)
Jacopo (2025-12-17 20:51:50+00:00): Hello
i'm going to revert this changeset in order to remove the railway lines since there are no longer any physical remanant. 
Jacopo
Paschberg (2025-12-18 06:24:22+00:00): Hello Jacopo,
do as you wish, 
I try to find out how do edit on ohm; its a bit more tricky there, I don´t know wheter I´m going to do that trouble; 
Another question: Do roads, that are aligned exactly on roman roads also have to be partly eliminated if the remnants cannot  be seen anymore (I think I have seen such a mapping once, but I can not remember where).
Martin (vg Paschberg)
Jacopo (2025-12-18 06:32:16+00:00): Dear Martin 
about roads if there are no traces left then i think they should not ve mapped. If there is a new modern road then we map that
Jacopo
Paschberg (2025-12-18 06:45:49+00:00): Dear Jacopo,
sorry I didnt ask exactly.
I ment things like that
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/662418569#map=16/53.78001/-1.43239

****
But thats in UK
And as some french say: "The britsh, are they mad?" . In british OS map are also courses of old railway mapped, not onyl where dams and cuts can bee seen (https://media-cdn.dovetailgames.com/2020/102020/10/OSMapNewtyle.png)
Martin
NeisBot (2025-10-22 22:06:30+00:00): Hi jasmine alla, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-10-22 22:06:30+00:00): Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added commercial building with name"
eggie (2025-10-23 06:06:24+00:00): Dag resitive.. Je hebt nu een groot gebouw getagd terwijl er zo op het oog niets te zien is. 
Ook in de BAG zie ik geen gebouw?
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=de+bijlen&objectId=0484300000002160&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=106629.62554074402&geometry.y=460170.6203759587&zoomlevel=13.01634634029531

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-23 06:11:45+00:00): Ik heb het gebouw vervangen door recreation_ground
eggie (2025-10-23 06:14:51+00:00): Die rails is er toch nog gewoon...  Waar verwijderd?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-23 06:24:16+00:00): Typo.. waarom?
Er zijn ook tags die aangeven als een spoor in onbruik is geraakt of zelfs verwijderd.
resitive (2025-10-24 19:53:55+00:00): Ha Eggie,

voor fort alpha inderdaad geen gebouw maar omheind sportterrein.
niet bewust geweest van automatische building tag, thx
resitive (2025-10-24 19:55:00+00:00): Spanbeton heeft de sporen laten verwijderen uit de wegdelen, echter als je beter lijkt deze te laten en disused tags moet laten is dit ook oke.

bedankt eggie.
eggie (2025-10-24 20:00:11+00:00): Hoi.. 

Weg is inderdaad weg, maar op de luchtfoto zijn ze nog te herkennen... 
Je zou dan  railway=razed kunnen gebruiken. Dat voorkomt opnieuw intekenen. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Drazed

Het is geen ramp hier. :)

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-22 22:01:00+00:00): Commentaar moet zijn .. als inner opgenomen in mp.
vicente lopez 2021 (2025-10-24 00:18:29+00:00): me ayudas con la autovia trelew madryn
felipeeugenio (2025-10-23 10:54:42+00:00): Hola. Las estructuras puedes cuadrarlas cn la letra Q. Así te quedan ángulos rectos. Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173650004
Adam Dunn (2025-10-29 16:40:43+00:00): There's a short bit of footpath at the south-east corner of Kay Meadow Park that has duplicate ways. One way says lit=yes, the other way says lit=no. If you have the chance, would you mind verifying which is correct? Thanks!
Jons Icoli (2025-10-30 19:37:09+00:00): Hi,

Will do when it's night time. IIRC there's some lamps there that don't put out enough light to see obstacles or dangers. I haven't been able to do the whole region yet tho
TriangleMaple (2025-10-22 23:28:16+00:00): I'm not quite sure if the roof pillars should be mapped like this
Gregory Peony (2025-11-07 05:15:20+00:00): I think you may have mapped a field as a building way 1444065514
user_5359 (2025-10-25 11:02:56+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key%3Algbtq for more information.
limes11 (2025-10-23 11:09:10+00:00): Den "Weg" über das Feld habe ich gelöscht, die klar erkennbaren Wege wiederhergestellt und mit access=private versehen. Somit sind sie für sämtliche Routingprogramme tot. Dies ist das korrekte Vorgehen und wird auch anderswo in ähnlichen Situationen gehandhabt.

Ich bitte nun dringlichst von weiteren Löschungen abzusehen.
Gregory Peony (2025-11-04 05:23:45+00:00): Roofs can have light and dark sections which make the appear like seperate buildings.
NeisBot (2025-10-23 00:26:36+00:00): Hi Key0tas, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-10-23 00:26:36+00:00): Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added buildings"
NeisBot (2025-10-23 00:46:36+00:00): Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Updated maximum speed limit to 10 mph"
NeisBot (2025-10-23 00:46:36+00:00): Hi GregSkow, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
neuhausr (2025-11-04 19:53:08+00:00): There are a couple issues with your changeset. One is that you have tagged an area as grass that from imagery appears to mostly be orchard. Also, the XC course you mapped is self-overlapping (ie repeats some parts of the route), and it's not clear how much of it is actually paths, or just running through the orchard. Ideally in a case like this you'd want to map the paths, then make a route that joins paths together in a particular order. (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Drunning) Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2025-10-23 02:18:35+00:00): Hi Travo656, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 6 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=173652514
Travo656 (2025-10-23 02:46:51+00:00): Definitely intentional, this whole area should not be marked as Wetland and it has caused major issues in the real world, on some maps as a result of this is shows up as this inland ocean, and that is incorrect. This feature should be removed. I am not sure why I can't remove it in one go.
fortera_au (2025-10-23 20:51:50+00:00): There might be better tagging to reflect the intermittent nature, plus something shouldn't be deleted just because of how it renders.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173652514
democat (2025-10-23 02:22:52+00:00): Using B-Roll provided by DFWIA: https://dfw.intelligencebank.com/customshare/index/KDj0d
NeisBot (2025-10-23 02:52:35+00:00): Hi Travo656, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 9 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=173652933
fortera_au (2025-10-23 20:51:35+00:00): There might be better tagging to reflect the intermittent nature, plus something shouldn't be deleted just because of how it renders.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173652933
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-24 05:12:52+00:00): I agree with @fortera_au , features like these shouldn't be deleted just because they don't render the way you expect.

The best next step would be to restore the deleted features and adjust their tagging to better reflect their actual nature, rather than removing them.
Travo656 (2025-10-24 05:32:07+00:00): If you restore the features it will open up this site to legal action, people have been injured because of this map, people have driven onto private property because it was marked as wetland when it was cattle property. You people don't even live locally and have no right to be arguing over this. There is currently a campaign to have the Bureau of Meteorology drop OpenStreetMap as a supplier of maps due to numerous errors with the maps, even my local Energy Provider could not find my address because OSM had the street name wrong yet Google Maps has it right. These online maps have real world consequences and I just ask that you don't ignore the real reason that these features were removed, they make it look like a year round ocean and this is not correct. I don't consider myself an expert on this site and don't know about tags or what not, but frankly if OSM wants to remain relevant or allowed to be used by businesses and public institutions it needs to make an effort to correct these mistakes. The map was wrong, I fixed it and your fighting with me over it? Why? Get a life because I am trying to save them.
fortera_au (2025-10-24 05:56:49+00:00): OpenStreetMap is a geospatial database, how things are rendered are up to those who consume that data. The rendering shown on openstreetmap.org is just an example rendering designed for mapper feedback. We don't change tags or delete objects based on how they show on one specific rendering.

If these are seasonal, there is the seasonal tag used to show this, which might change how other data consumers then show those objects, and that's how these issues should be corrected, not just deleting them. 

You say you've "fixed the map", but at this stage, I don't think I'd agree based on your comments. If these wetlands don't exist at all, that's fine, but you'd need to say that, and if someone queries the removal, engage in good faith.

I've had a look at aerial imagery, and these areas do look like they resemble wetlands, so this might need to be reverted, and then tagged more appropriately.

On the topic of incorrect street names, the great thing is that you can just come on here and change it! You don't need to ask Google and hope they get it right eventually, you can do it yourself.
tyoyudi76 (2025-10-23 05:52:56+00:00): Halo kak ghifari, perkenalkan saya setyono saya seorang freelancer mungkin ditempat kak ghifari membutuhkan seseorang seperti saya , saya bisa membantu . terima kasih
NeisBot (2025-10-23 03:46:37+00:00): Hi ElusiveMoth, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish