piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
une abeille (2025-01-20 00:12:53+00:00): Hi there, what is your reasoning for moving the curb nodes on this crossing? Generally, we position them so they are on the spot where the sidewalk meets the road, not part-way up.
DJ_JB (2025-01-21 14:04:46+00:00): It looks terribly clumsy and that's not a natural way in which someone would walk when crossing the road.
une abeille (2025-01-23 02:45:52+00:00): But it represents the physical reality of where curbs are, and how long crossings are. People can always choose to make slight detours when they walk in order to optimise their route, but that isn't what we represent on a map.

I can point you to some resources about sidewalk mapping if you'd like to learn more. Otherwise, please leave the work of other mappers intact. :)
Tjuro (2025-02-11 08:05:28+00:00): Hello Nadleeh,

I see that you added access=no, access=no is reserved for military terrain or similar, not for roads with access.

Greetings,

Tjuro
eggie (2025-02-11 10:42:35+00:00): Bij mijn weten mag je gewoon fietsen en brommeren. op de Bachbaan. Er staat een G12 bord.
Wat zou hier veranderd zijn? 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-11 10:51:32+00:00): https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=51.836818346&lng=4.311693907&z=17
.. access=no heb ik verwijderd. Dat wordt bijna altijd verkeerd gebruikt. Waarom zou deze straat Verboden Toegang zijn? 
Ik heb mofa en moped weer op yes gezet en verkeersbord NL:C12 toegevoegd.

Wat is dan verwarrend hier?
..mofa en moped zijn geen motorvoertuigen in de wegenverkeerswet, maar zijn het wel in OSM. Dat laatste is dan inderdaad verwarrend. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-11 10:53:02+00:00): typo C12 bord
une abeille (2025-01-20 00:14:36+00:00): Please do not delete the short ways that connect sidewalks to curbs. They help with wheelchair routing! :)
DJ_JB (2025-01-21 14:01:25+00:00): Restored, but smaller
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2025-01-31 18:29:12+00:00): أهلا وسهلا بك في خريطة الشارع المفتوحة وجزاك الله خير على هذه المساهمة وشكرا لك
Nakaner (2025-01-17 20:37:44+00:00): survey was done by train
muphin (2025-01-21 08:57:44+00:00): Hoi Nadleeh, ik heb een klein gedeelte  busbaan weer teruggezet naar tertiaire weg - de busbaan begint pas bij het park.
SomeoneElse (2026-01-02 00:12:05+00:00): Hello,
This is now wheelchair=yes;no .  Do you have any idea which should it be?
TheUKHighStreet (2026-01-02 09:14:30+00:00): No, sorry. The way has always had wheelchair=yes. But the node had wheelchair=no. I think this will need a survey.
TheUKHighStreet (2026-01-02 09:17:51+00:00): The website does say it has an accessible toilet
https://www.socialpubandkitchen.co.uk/earl-of-camden
SomeoneElse (2026-01-05 00:29:20+00:00): Thanks - based on that I've sent it to "yes"
berndw (2025-06-23 08:13:15+00:00): Hallo Pajopath,

es folgt ein Hinweis aber kein Vorwurf ;-)

Du hast mit diesem Changeset die L258 nördlich von Rüscheid zur Einbahnstraße gemacht, da du vor dem Setzen von oneway=yes, die Straße nicht korrekt aufgeteilt hast.

siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4818817#map=18/50.526742/7.571248&layers=N

Habe das Problem behoben


Bernd
Pajopath (2025-06-23 08:56:16+00:00): argh :D
Pajopath (2025-06-23 08:58:03+00:00): aber gut zu wissen, den rückbau hab ich übersehen, da muss ich für https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/way-aufteilung-bei-durchgezogener-linie/127802/20 meine Änderungen eh wieder rückgängig machen... :(
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-17 21:11:04+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12510886269

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Leśny Patrol (2025-01-23 20:43:45+00:00): Correct link to images of the area is this one: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1lGGIeaHttLI27a6v7-meZE20HHLKFaUz
Edelsalami (2025-01-18 09:20:48+00:00): Hi Nordgork alias Streetview247, du hast den Umriss des Spielplatzes Parkstraße auf den Sandkasten reduziert. Kannst du diese Änderung begründen? Ein Sandkasten ist nicht dasselbe wie ein Spielplatz. Gruß
Jordi MF_import (2025-01-17 23:25:05+00:00): Hola Jrgm00,

Gracias por mejorar los datos de OSM, pero la Academia DOCEO- Centro de repaso, como su nombre indica, es una academia educativa de repaso, no es una escuela reglada. Según la wiki, estas academias deben de etiquetarse como amenity=prep_school (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=prep%20school?uselang=ca).

Saludos.
jaap de vries (2025-01-20 07:48:51+00:00): Hier komen geen huizen, de grond is zwaar vervuild hier. Er zijn meerdere rechtzaken geweest over deze vervuiling, het kampje zou eerst in z'n geheel weggaan vanwege de zware vervuilde grond.
Tomas09 (2025-01-24 16:58:50+00:00): Ik ben er weer even langgeweest en het beter bekeken. het is inderdaad niet construction maar er wordt wel aan gewerkt (het viezigheid wordt weggehaald) ik weet dus alleen niet hoe ik dat zou moeten taggen! als er een manier is om fotos toetevoegen zou ik dat graag voor u doen.
eggie (2025-01-18 09:59:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NieWnen (2025-01-17 21:42:41+00:00): *Raszyn
NeisBot (2025-01-17 21:52:38+00:00): Hi icy_cold_, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 9 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=161472153
eerib (2025-01-17 22:41:36+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by changeset #161473395 - Mass vandalism/deletion of mountain bike trails associated with previous vandalism.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161473395
joost schouppe (2025-03-26 15:48:17+00:00): Hoi Eebie,
Voor https://osm.org/way/270555041/ : in België (op zijn minst) gebruiken we childcare voor kinderopvang, en nursery enkel voor kleuterklasjes. Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Schools
Eebie (2025-03-30 20:43:07+00:00): Dit is een moeilijke. Ik gebruik de presets in JOSM. In de Nederlandse versie kan via het menu van JOSM "Kindercreche" kiezen en dan zet JOSM "Kindergarten". In de Engelse versie is de vertaling van die menukeuze meteen   "Kindergarten".  De vraag voor een aanpassing van JOSM is iets voor de chat.
joost schouppe (2025-04-01 07:03:54+00:00): Naar aanleiding van de discussie heb ik alvast de conventions voor België wat zichtbaarder gemaakt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dkindergarten#Usage_in_specific_countries
driesverlinden (2025-03-17 11:29:22+00:00): @jozin-belgium, de nummering in de Roggerstraat is niet meer correct met de data die in GRB zit. Eerder ook al opgemerkt voor Egemsestraat.
jozin-belgium (2025-07-10 20:42:55+00:00): Excuseer, mijn emailadres is niet meer up to date. Daardoor kon ik geen berichten lezen. Ik wijzig hier dus niks meer.
theophrastos (2025-01-24 20:51:12+00:00): Hallo,

die Hörblacher Straße ist zwischen Mainsondheim und St 2271 gesperrt und im Bereich des Autobahnausbaus auch teilweise abgerissen. Deine Änderungen spiegeln einen inzwischen nicht mehr vorhandenen Zustand wider. Auch die Rückverlegung der Autobahn auf die alte Trasse entspricht nicht dem aktuellen Bauzustand. Magst du die vorherige Situation wiederherstellen?

theophrastos
wyk (2025-01-25 07:08:56+00:00): OK, das war wohl ein Fehler von mir. Kannst Du die Autobahn und Hörblacher Straße zurückverlegen? Du has mehr Erfahrung als ich, ich fühle mich im Moment überfordert. Ich kümmere mich später um die Buslinien die ich über die Strecke habe fahren lassen. Muß ich beim Landratsamt nachfragen wo die jetzt fahren. Danke.
theophrastos (2025-01-25 17:03:11+00:00): Ja, mach ich. Die Buslinie fährt vermutlich über Albertshofen, Gewerbepark Schwarzacher Str., dies ist zumindest die offizielle Umleitung, ich schau morgen nachmittag mal nach, ob etwas zu erkennen ist.
SomeoneElse (2025-01-18 11:36:04+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Just to let you know, after this edit there was a bit of a gap in the relation for the Sperrins AONB.  I created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1352303735 and added it to the relation to fill it in.
Let me know if you've got any questions.
Cheers,
Andy
CurlingMan13 (2025-08-07 17:16:35+00:00): Are the roads under construction to be added?  Or are they being removed?  Or are they fenced off?
StreetSurveyor (2025-08-08 23:31:37+00:00): The roads are established, but they’re currently fenced off due to the demolition of the trailer park. It’s unclear at this time whether they’ll remain in place or be removed.
JJIglesias (2025-01-18 07:48:52+00:00): Saludos. 
Cuando vayas a cambiar un nombre de un elemento, a no ser que el nuevo nombre sea totalmente diferente, el nombre existente no lo borras sino que lo pones en la etiqueta alt_name=xxx y el nuevo nombre pasa a la etiqueta name=xxx.

Si el nombre es totalmente diferente, pero el elemento es del mismo tenor, entonces el nombre existente se cambia a la etiqueta old_name=xxx y el nuevo nombre entra en la etiqueta name=xxx

Si el elemento tiene un nombre oficial distinto o mas extenso que el nombre usual etiquetado en name=xxx entonces ese nombre largo se coloca en la etiqueta official_name=xxx y el nombre comun queda en la etiqueta name=xxx normal.

Gracias
adneripac (2025-01-19 12:40:17+00:00): Muchas gracias por tu mensaje y por los tips. Voy a tomarlos en cuenta para las siguientes ediciones. Saludos.
cuzi (2025-01-18 12:52:00+00:00): What's the reason for this change?
cuzi (2025-01-31 11:19:14+00:00): I have reverted this changeset

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161973273
Wmelonk (2025-01-17 23:12:21+00:00): удалите точку
ilias_ (2025-01-17 23:26:25+00:00): Copy pasting a comment from one of your previous changesets:

Hello,
Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)
But please make smalle change sets, this helps others in tracking changes.
Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thank you.
Ekeefoof (2025-01-18 16:15:33+00:00): It looks like some existing roads were deleted as well, for example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35030028
woodpeck (2025-01-21 10:52:20+00:00): Thank you, I hope I fixed this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161595102
pesticides (2025-01-17 23:18:42+00:00): A duplicate feature for the Hood Canal was added in changeset 1275928557. The changeset comment indicates it was done to add an alternate name for the Hood Canal, the Salish Fjord. In this changeset, I deleted the redundant feature and added that name as an alt_name for the Hood Canal relation.

Note that the name "Salish Fjord" was rejected by the Washington State Committee on Geographic Names. The meeting minutes are available here: https://www.dnr.wa.gov/publications/bc_geog_12112023_minutes.pdf (2023-12-11).
pesticides (2025-01-19 21:41:57+00:00): I'm not sure the name Salish Fjord is actually in common use. As far as I can tell, it was just one person campaigning to change the name. I'm not local to the area though, so I won't remove it myself.
citrula (2025-01-18 17:16:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! This was already mapped as a playground - I have removed the duplicate you added.
MissMarcoPolo (2025-01-17 23:42:50+00:00): Correction: Source used was “Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2024-11-10“.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-17 23:50:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9963229535

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
nevw (2025-01-18 21:40:55+00:00): Hi, this appears to be not located at the Tolmie Mexhanics Institute as tagged
GOD84 (2025-03-06 01:24:35+00:00): Unlock
nevw (2025-01-18 03:55:06+00:00): Hi, you have added two defibrillators here and they appear to be in the same building. Can you confirm the details are correct.
kmpoppe (2025-01-18 05:24:01+00:00): Hey,

you updated the opening hours here, but the end time is still 17.00 (rather than 17:00), is there a reason for that?

K
TheSwavu (2025-01-18 05:47:23+00:00): Nah, just a screw up. It would have been flagged again in tomorrow's Osmose update.
ZLima12 (2025-02-26 05:47:56+00:00): Hi,

What is the source for the destination:lanes tags you added? I don't recall there being signs for the RFK bridge here.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161475541
silversurfer83 (2025-01-18 08:08:31+00:00): Hola :)

como ya se ha mencionado en otro comentario, no debe eliminar los datos existentes y luego simplemente volver a dibujar la misma calle. A esto lo llamamos «Conservar el historial» y se explica aquí:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mantener_el_historial

También me gustaría pedirte que escribas mejor los comentarios. El editor Vespucci tiene un campo separado para esto, que aparece cuando quieres guardar tus cambios.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios

feliz mapeo

Traducción realizada con la versión gratuita del traductor DeepL.com
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161475732
Mxdanger (2025-01-18 02:22:58+00:00): 100th edit 🎉
DLZ2024 (2025-01-18 02:28:56+00:00): Also added some water bodies near near Caspie Drain.
shanhulittle (2025-01-19 09:43:54+00:00): 感谢您对道路等级的编辑。
但是，primary, secondary, tertiary不能简单等同于省道、县道、乡道。要和本身道路的道路等级（一级-三级公路）、车道数、限速以及片区规划等统一考虑。
不要随意将高等级道路改为低等级道路。
user_21880486 (2025-01-18 20:17:07+00:00): I revert it because they're my edits and I did something wrong

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161504655
aharvey (2025-01-18 03:06:05+00:00): Hi could you please advise the rationale behind theses changes? To me these look questionable and I don't think we should necessarily be actioning all JOSM validator issues.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161476767
user_21880486 (2025-01-18 03:12:28+00:00): Hi there,

Could you explain what you mean? I used the JOSM validator, found warnings / errors, let JOSM fix some of them.
user_21880486 (2025-01-18 03:14:16+00:00): I don't see an issue with doing that. Please let me know if there is, as I'm new to this.
aharvey (2025-01-18 10:43:44+00:00): Yeah in my view a lot of the JOSM validator warnings are too strict.

For example source:geometry is fine and acceptable to use to document the source of the geometry https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source:geometry even on nodes. It doesn't need to be changed to source:position doing so has no benefit and just creates noise which makes it harder for mappers.

level=0 is a good way to tag something as being explicitly on level=0, otherwise you can't know if it wasn't mapped yet or really is on level 0. In fact for this reason alone I think we should/need to revert all these "Batch edit tags using JOSM validator" as it's damaging the data.

Furthermore can you explain your exact process for these changes? Because it appears like an automated edit, or are you manually reviewing and applying fixes. If an automated change it should be discussed first.
aharvey (2025-01-18 10:47:19+00:00): Even changing cycleway/sidewalk:left and :right into a single tag https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/447120360 I think it's not helpful, while the two different ways of tagging can be interpreted as the same, for mappers entering data it's best to retain what was mapped.

I'll ask if you can please stop doing these validator edits, then I believe we should just go ahead and mass-revert all of them, then going forward systematic changes should be first discussed with the community.
aharvey (2025-01-18 20:42:06+00:00): It's not just this one, it'll all of them. I think systematic bulk changes like this should be first discussed, or at least discussed before continuing further.
Supaplex (2025-01-18 03:45:54+00:00): 馬盟山->馬鳴山
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161476883
shanhulittle (2025-01-19 09:52:29+00:00): 感谢您对道路等级的编辑。
但是，primary, secondary, tertiary不能简单等同于省道、县道、乡道。要和本身道路的道路等级（一级-三级公路）、车道数、限速以及片区规划等统一考虑。
不要随意将高等级道路改为低等级道路。
shanhulittle (2025-01-19 09:48:46+00:00): 感谢您对道路等级的编辑。
但是，primary, secondary, tertiary不能简单等同于省道、县道、乡道。要和本身道路的道路等级（一级-三级公路）、车道数、限速以及片区规划等统一考虑。
不要随意将高等级道路改为低等级道路。
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-30 09:21:43+00:00): Removed SEO spam image=* tag, fixed malformed addr:street=* and disambiguated mobile=* in changeset 183390547

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183390547
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-31 00:08:54+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam tags and used consistent tagging with other Clean Recovery Centers in changeset 183422301

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183422301
iandees (2025-01-18 17:27:50+00:00): Are you in Hayward? Stay warm, if so!
quincylvania (2025-01-18 18:10:09+00:00): Hah thanks! But no, sadly, I’m just adding the mimics tag to various fun buildings
aceman444 (2025-05-19 06:07:21+00:00): Hi, never do changes in such a big geographical region in one changeset! It is hard to check that later and needlessly notifies people watching the affected regions even when nothing has changed in large parts of the area.

Also, why adding invalid tags like 'level' into object https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/50380043 when the proper building:levels tag is already present?
aceman444 (2026-05-10 22:02:21+00:00): Also, why did you remove tram stop https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8836057820 ?
PostaMap_Infinite (2025-01-18 04:16:46+00:00): I will mark the location of my specific edit with an OSM Note explaining the edit, with the changeset as the title. and showing the description of the Osmose issue. Please let me know if I made a mistake and feel free to revert my edit.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 00:47:10+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164876351
galen8183 (2025-01-18 04:49:23+00:00): whoops, I didn't mean to request a review
bxl-forever (2025-01-23 10:32:51+00:00): Hello,

The official speed limit here is 30 km/h.  Your changeset has been reverted.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161667848

Please check this picture, which was taken this Thursday: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1123343455742104

There is no C43 road sign to mention a 50 km/h speed, therefore the defaultt 30 km/h speed limit of the Brussels-Capital Region applies. (https://www.code-de-la-route.be/fr/reglementation/1975120109~hra8v386pu#pcwb5s3qpd or https://www.wegcode.be/nl/regelgeving/1975120109~hra8v386pu#qnofdw3izy)
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:49:08+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482594
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:49:09+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482594
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:49:10+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482594
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:49:11+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482594
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:49:12+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482594
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:07:30+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161483086
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:07:31+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161483086
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:08:02+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161483098
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:08:31+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161483116
AlmostBitter (2025-01-18 05:48:03+00:00): please review the all-way stop in the NE corner of the edit area.  Wasn't sure whether to put the traffic_sign on the intersecting node, or put one at each stop-line.
AlmostBitter (2025-01-18 05:48:31+00:00): wiki says to put the highway=stop on the intersecting node for an all-way stop.
citrula (2025-01-18 17:07:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have taken a look at your edits - traffic_sign=stop should only go where the traffic sign is, not on the highway. Otherwise, these edits look good to me.
citrula (2025-01-18 17:14:47+00:00): I went ahead and made the edit, you can review it here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161499321
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:08:32+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161483116
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:09:00+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161483131
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:09:01+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161483131
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:10:17+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161483169
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:10:10+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161483167
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:09:55+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161483157
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:09:39+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161483149
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:10:46+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161483186
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:10:47+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161483186
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:52:27+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482700
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:52:28+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482700
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:52:29+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482700
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:52:30+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482700
shanhulittle (2025-01-19 09:44:22+00:00): 感谢您对道路等级的编辑。
但是，primary, secondary, tertiary不能简单等同于省道、县道、乡道。要和本身道路的道路等级（一级-三级公路）、车道数、限速以及片区规划等统一考虑。
不要随意将高等级道路改为低等级道路。
shanhulittle (2025-01-19 09:46:52+00:00): 感谢您对道路等级的编辑。
但是，primary, secondary, tertiary不能简单等同于省道、县道、乡道。要和本身道路的道路等级（一级-三级公路）、车道数、限速以及片区规划等统一考虑。
不要随意将高等级道路改为低等级道路。
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:54:47+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482766
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:54:48+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482766
shanhulittle (2025-01-19 09:47:57+00:00): 感谢您对道路等级的编辑。
但是，primary, secondary, tertiary不能简单等同于省道、县道、乡道。要和本身道路的道路等级（一级-三级公路）、车道数、限速以及片区规划等统一考虑。
不要随意将高等级道路改为低等级道路。
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:54:23+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482756
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:54:24+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482756
shanhulittle (2025-01-19 09:53:56+00:00): 感谢您对道路等级的编辑。
但是，primary, secondary, tertiary不能简单等同于省道、县道、乡道。要和本身道路的道路等级（一级-三级公路）、车道数、限速以及片区规划等统一考虑。
不要随意将高等级道路改为低等级道路。
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:54:25+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482756
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:54:26+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482756
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:54:27+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482756
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:54:28+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482756
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:58:10+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482840
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:58:11+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482840
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:58:12+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482840
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:56:26+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482799
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:56:27+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482799
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:56:28+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482799
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:56:29+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482799