piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2025-09-20 07:08:32+00:00): Hi Tebby, 

You identified buildings in the imagery, appropriately tagged and squared them and  their overall shapes are generally accurate. The L shaped building is actually just a rectangle but the imagery is taken at an angle. You could make your footprins even more accurate by mapping them smaller than the roof you see in imagery and by excluding the shadow they cast one the ground.

Here's a general comment about mapping building footpritns. 

Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.
Enock4seth (2025-10-17 11:19:06+00:00): Hi, I am deleted most buildings from this changeset as it only added duplicates. Please download existing data from OpenStreetMap in JOSM before adding new features.
martien-176 (2025-09-19 18:56:27+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape more accurately then you do here. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Don't include the building's shadow.

After mapping buildings, please remember to square their corners. Most buildings have square corners because that's easy to build. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that the corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, use the `Q` key to square the corners.

Please check out these sources for more info:
- Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
- Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT global validator.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172177393
habi (2026-04-07 09:51:06+00:00): Ciao Swissreactions

Du hast hier der Städtchenstrasse (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1092078758/history/3) ein `access=no` vergeben, d.h. jegliche "Verwendung" ausgeschlossen.
Das scheint nicht zu stimmen und wurde in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5237285 bemerkt.
Ist das ebtl. ein Tippfehler?
Gruss,
habi
L'imaginaire (2025-09-23 10:28:07+00:00): 👍
m@rio (2025-12-14 13:09:05+00:00): na jakiej podstawie wycofałeś zestaw 172176693?
m@rio (2026-01-09 15:16:08+00:00): kolego, zestaw 172178322 to wandalizm - napraw proszę to co zepsułeś.
YomanNH (2026-01-11 10:05:08+00:00): @m@rio: on i tak tego nie naprawi. Dla niego nie ma nadzieji. On potrafi tylko wycofywać i niszczyć prawidłowe mapowanie.
m@rio (2026-01-11 11:35:02+00:00): Masz rację YomanNH.
Pytanie tylko, czy powinniśmy takie zachowanie tolerować..
YomanNH (2026-01-11 21:03:38+00:00): Nie powinniśmy, ale patrząc na to jakie dziadostwo robi i jak często mapuje według własnych urojonych pomysłów, jestem pod wrażeniem, że jeszcze nie dostał żadnego bana.
t_ja (2025-09-21 09:12:07+00:00): Ahoj,
pokial menis hodnotu "construction" napr. na "rail", treba este pozriet ci je pritomny aj tag "construction", ktory treba v tomto pripade odmazat.
Cize povodne "railway=construction" + "construction=rail" sa zmeni len na "railway=rail" (s odmazanym tagom "construction=rail").

Prosim o opravu.

T.
StC (2025-09-20 16:21:25+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
SomeoneElse (2025-09-21 10:14:06+00:00): Hello,
I think that something has gone a bit wrong here.  There seems to be no way to get from one side of Ty Mawr Road to the other.
Imagine you're following the Cambrian Way long distance path https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11661295#map=20/51.5121149/-3.2373653 - you'll see a gap.
Using a router to try and cross that gap you're directed like this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=51.512009%2C-3.237576%3B51.512273%2C-3.237295#map=18/51.511749/-3.237306
I'm sure that this is not really how it is - in practice the path from the Southwest and also the one northwest
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=51.512324%2C-3.2374196%3B51.5122606%2C-3.2373109#map=19/51.512675/-3.236990
actually do join Ty Mawr Road.
Best Regards,
Andy
PS: Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.
custodiankeyy (2025-09-19 19:49:58+00:00): Mevcut bulunan yolun ismini değiştirmek/düzenlemek yerine yeni bir yol oluşturuyorsunuz. Lütfen bunu yapmayın.
custodiankeyy (2025-09-19 19:38:16+00:00): Binaları eklerken sadece binanın bulunduğu yeri çizin. Site alanını belirtmek için landuse=residental, residental=apartments etiketlerini kullanabilirsiniz.

Düzenledim:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172179653
literan (2025-09-20 09:51:07+00:00): почему surface=sett? здесь обычная тротуарная плитка https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CLekAAz7

брусчатку из камня в России не кладут, не по карману. Только в Калининграде она есть и на Красной площади

исправлю
Jordi MF (2025-09-19 21:01:51+00:00): Hola Thegik,

Gràcies per millorar la base de dades d'OSM. Miant l'ortofoto més recent de 2024, no s'observa ningun camp d'esports en este lloc. Has anomenat el lloc com a "Estadi Xapes Fc", però per a afegi un nom, és necessari que exstisca alguna web de l'ajuntament o entitat privada que afirme que es diu així.

Per una altra banda, malauradament, si realment no existeix un camp o tablero dissenyat específicament per a jugar a les xapes, no podem mapejar-lo perquè ha de tractar-se d'un element físic que existisca i que es puga comprovar presencialment (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground).

Per favor confirma'ns que existeix realment el camp d'esports. Sé que és decebedor no poder mapejar una cosa en la que tens interés, però hem de complir les normes d'OSM.

Gràcies i bon mapeig!
custodiankeyy (2025-09-19 19:35:33+00:00): Sildiğiniz yerler artık orada bulunmamakta mı? İnternette 'Sevgi Durağı Restaurant & Cafe' arattığımda Yemek Sepeti ve Getir'de halen gözüküyor.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-09-21 01:44:03+00:00): Kullanıcının sildiği eczanelerden Çiftçi Eczanesi de Edirne Eczacılar Odası'nın sitesinde hâlâ aynı noktada görünüyor. (29 Eylül tarihli nöbet listesinde: https://www.edirneeo.org.tr/nobetci-eczaneler) 

Kavşağa trafik ışıkları konulmadıysa yol ver tabelasının kalkmış olma ihtimali de düşük. Bu kullanıcı onu da silmiş(node/5771317248).
custodiankeyy (2025-09-21 19:24:36+00:00): Değişiklik setini geri aldım.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172262272
VictorIE (2026-03-25 10:46:13+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1431338180/

I'm not sure what roof:shape=ac is meant to be.

Should this building:part be part of the building next door? See Bing Streetside.
LateNightTone (2026-03-25 10:53:37+00:00): Thanks for flagging – it was meant to be roof:orientation=across. And I can confirm it's part of the cafe building to the right, not the house to the left.
zbh0170 (2025-09-19 19:46:44+00:00): En précision : le sentier rejoint celui des Fècles aux environs du chemin menant au merlon
cartomatto (2025-09-21 13:51:25+00:00): 1) le info che hai ripristinato sono obsolete
2) non corrispondono allo stato di fatto sul terreno nè alla segnaletica
3) generano pertanto confusione in chi usa i dati OSM sul posto
4) potevi discuterne prima di ripristinare
Pertanto le tue modifiche sono errate. Puoi cortesemente e urgentemente ripristinare le modifiche che avevo fatto? Grazie
M_Gaugg (2025-09-19 20:02:01+00:00): Ja da hast du recht, ist definitiv T4
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-19 19:50:55+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097671
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/733179789

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Piotr Strębski (2025-09-20 13:25:23+00:00): poprawione
eggie (2025-09-19 20:12:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-09-19 20:22:25+00:00): Je hebt een stukje aansluiting op oneway=yes gezet en daarmee de fietsroute geblokkeerd.
Er zal denk ik dan toch ook een uitzondering voor tweewielers moeten worden bijgetagd. ... of zelf denk ik dat het eenrichtingsverkeer is. Hoe komt anders regulier verkeer vanaf de brug op de ventweg Van Riebeecklaan?

Voorlopig pas ik oneway=yes weer aan naar oneway=no. 

Graag reactie
eggie
ArneHen (2025-09-19 20:25:34+00:00): Hi Eggie, je hebt gelijk. Het eenrichtingsverkeer is uitgezonderd bromfietsen. Dank voor je correctie
ArneHen (2025-09-19 20:28:37+00:00): En het is echt eenrichtingsverkeer voor gemotoriseerd verkeer. Je kunt alleen vanaf de brug op de ventweg komen door helemaal met de klok mee door de wijk te rijden. Ja echt waar, ik woon er naast :-)
eggie (2025-09-19 20:29:21+00:00): Oke....   maar dat heb ik niet aangepast.
Ik heb dat kleine stukje gewoon weer op oneway=no gezet omdat autoverkeer anders niet op de ventweg kan komen.
Mocht het wel eenrichtingverkeer zijn dan zullen voor drie categrorieën tweewielers uitzonderingen moeten worden toegevoegd.
Dus de hamvraag is of dat stukje tussen de kruising en de ventweg wel eenrichtingsverkeer kan zijn. Logischewijs niet.
Laat maar weten.
Het fietspad zelf heb ik wel G12a getagd.
ArneHen (2025-09-19 20:30:23+00:00): en ook nog een bron:
 https://haarlem.nl/doorfietsroute-lodewijk-van-deyssellaan-en-herinrichting-pim-mulierlaan

De Lodewijk van Deyssellaan tussen de Laurens Reaellaan en Stuyvesantbrug wordt eenrichtingsverkeer voor auto’s van noord naar zuid.
eggie (2025-09-19 20:31:16+00:00): Onze berichten kruisten elkaar.
Wat een gedoe om daar te komen. 

Dan tag je dus oneway=yes
met oneway:bicycle=no
oneway:mofa=no
oneway:moped=no

Pas je het zelf aan.
ArneHen (2025-09-19 20:45:40+00:00): dank voor je hulp, aangepast.
multichill (2025-11-01 16:38:20+00:00): Zie ook https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4122655
Dit is een rottig stukje voor auto's, in het ontwerp staat ook "Fietsstraat is een éénrichtingsweg
voor gemotoriseerd verkeer
((brom-)fietsers in tweerichtingen).
Gemotoriseerd verkeer vanaf de
Stuyvesantbrug brug mag niet de
Lodewijk van Deyssellaan in."
user_5359 (2025-09-20 09:09:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition!
You only added the name of a shop to the building, but did not note that there is also a shop there. If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://wiki.osm.org.
AndyB_66 (2025-09-19 20:34:52+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn
user_5359 (2025-09-20 08:59:36+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key%3Aarea%3Ahighway.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-19 20:30:47+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398714524
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1348999234

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Gregory Peony (2025-09-19 21:22:11+00:00): Hello, the footprints you have mapped here all represnet buildings, but the imagery allows them to be mapped more accurately. See how I mapped them in https://osmcha.org/changesets/172182439 Thank you for your contribution. 

A comment about mapping buildings;

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.
redd (2025-09-20 20:31:57+00:00): Danke!!
eggie (2025-09-19 20:51:11+00:00): Je edits:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=172181640

Hier zit nog een foutje in de key  Woordje 'met' moet weg.
bicycle=designated hoeft niet.
Is dit stukje ook al cyclestreet ??? dan toevoegen cyclestreet=yes
traffic_sign=NL:L51
eggie (2025-09-19 20:52:53+00:00): Laat bicycle=designated maar staan. Dat staat op het verder verloop ook.
Denk dus alleen aanpassen naar cyclestreet en dat woordje met weg.
ArneHen (2025-09-19 20:59:40+00:00): ik heb de tags nu overgenomen van de rest van de fietsstraat, het korte stukje heeft exact dezelfde eigenschappen
eggie (2025-09-20 06:57:42+00:00): Dag Arne, Wat ook  niet klopt is de oversteek Stuyvesantbrug voor tweewielers.
Ik heb het nu even routeerbaar gemaakt, maar logisch is het allemaal niet.
Van west naar oost.. Een stukje footway...  (nu door mij weer fietspad gemaakt..  anders geen routering. ) Dan eens stukje fietspad voor en op de brug. Dan tweewielers afstappen door het tunneltje.
Is et niet gewoon een stukje fietspad vanaf de het C Reinierspad t.m de trap. Fietsers e.d. afstappen.
Is het nog steeds de bedoeling dat tweewielers de IJsbaantunnel nemen. In dat geval zal er consistent getagd moeten worden.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-20 07:00:55+00:00): Aanvulling.. Je haalde de oversteek weg, maar dan houdt ook de routering voor fietsers op? Voor nu dus even opgelost door van het voetpad een fietspad te maken. 
Dan is het in ieder geval weer mogelijk om de brug te pakken voor tweewielers.
ArneHen (2025-09-20 08:09:02+00:00): ik heb het gecheckt, en zoals je het aangepast hebt, klopt het nu.
eggie (2025-09-20 08:13:28+00:00): Oke..  thx....  Zijn we er toch uitgekomen :)
divaddivag (2025-10-29 15:00:11+00:00): Bonjour PèreForez, je ne comprends pas ce que vous avez souhaité faire ici. J'ai visité ce site il y a 6 mois et il est possible que cela ait changé. Si ce n'est pas le cas, la plaque que vous avez retirée (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13138373620) est un ajout sur la stèle des unités d'infanterie au message/date/référence MGW différents, et pour cela que je l'ai mappé comme un nœud indépendant et proche de celle-ci. Je m’interroge sur l'utilisation du tag name pour 'retranscrire' ce que la plaque pourrait signifier: utilisez plutôt le tag 'description' et garder le tag 'name' pour le nom officiel (voire d'usage partagé par tous). La grande majorité de ces éléments ne sont pas nommés et donc pas besoin d'inventer quoique ce soit. Bien à vous. David
PèreForez (2025-12-29 16:59:48+00:00): Bonsoir divaddivag, pardon pour ce long délai pour ma réponse, étant reté  tout ce temps sans intevention dans OSM...
Entout c
PèreForez (2025-12-29 17:16:30+00:00): En tout cas je n'arrive pas maintenant à retrouver à la suite de quel raisonnement absurde et foireux j'ai pu supprime le nœud que tu avais créé, surtout pour en créer un nouveau semblable et voisin du bon emplacement. Je ne vois qu'une solution logique, c'est la suppression du nœud que j'ai créé (ce que je peux faire) et que tu rétablisses ton nœud d'origine (ce que je ne sais pas faire) pour revenir à la situation initiale. Merci d'avoir noté cette erreur.
Cordialement
divaddivag (2025-12-30 09:17:13+00:00): Merci pour ton retour! J'avais rectifié dans le sens que tu proposes il y a quelques semaines, tout est en ordre désormais. Dans le secteur, une stèle est éligible à MGW: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13138373622 et j'ai vu passé cela dans la presse: https://www.ouest-france.fr/normandie/fierville-bray-14190/liberation-de-fierville-bray-la-commune-a-fete-la-liberation-pendant-trois-jours-8cffe644-7db5-11f0-8eb0-56f672d6e343 . J'irais voir cela un de ces jours et compléter le sujet 'historic=memorial' de cette interco: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2i0Q . Bonne journée David
eggie (2025-09-19 21:05:22+00:00): Oke .. top....  Vraag me alleen of  die parallel parkeerstroken (street_side)  daar ook zijn. 
Het zal in ieder geval nu naar behoren routeren

Groet en veel plezier met mappen,
eggie
redd (2025-09-20 20:31:15+00:00): Vielen Dank!
skquinn (2025-09-22 10:22:34+00:00): Hi,

When changing an address, please be sure the new address is in the correct location. Your edit was on a node in the previous office's location and would actually direct people to the wrong location even when searching on the new address. This has since been fixed.
Gregory Peony (2025-09-19 21:44:24+00:00): Hi camilaparrad, welcome to OSM! 

You correctly identified buildings in imagery, appropriately squared most footpritns and even identified a building under construction. good job trying to map the actual shapes of buildings. 

The footprins could be mapped more accurately if they were generally smaller. 

You created a shared node between a building and residential area: hold alt to prevent this. 

I recommend you save your contributions say every 15 minutes.

The following are some relevant comments about mapping;

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as highways or residential areas. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data and accidentally creating shared(grey) nodes. This [video about connected nodes](https://youtu.be/ltn1VOiq5_0) has more information and a guide.


Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-09-19 21:31:44+00:00): What "next" intersection? What street were you driving from? What's the name of the street of the "next" intersection? What direction were you driving along (north, south, west, east, etc.)? Also, a street changing its name just before reaching its terminus (endpoint) is very rare and impractical. Can you please provide more details? Thanks.
itsken34 (2025-09-19 21:38:03+00:00): I am pulling out of the V gate community (map says Strada Montecatini) but the actual street name is Via Vasari.  The map on my Tesla should show that I can make a left out of the drive but instead it shows to make a right and a 3 point turn at Lake Las Vegas Parkway and Highland Shore Drive.
itsken34 (2025-09-19 21:40:45+00:00): any part of the street that says Strada Montecatini should be Via Vasari
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-09-20 00:00:52+00:00): I think I found what happened. First, I verified the street names and changed them accordingly. Second, I found a "U-turn only" relation comprising the way intersecting Lake Las Vegas Parkway and the westernmost node of said way. I'll use street-level imagery to fix it.
itsken34 (2025-09-20 01:15:16+00:00): thank you
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-09-20 00:14:48+00:00): Hello, why did you change the name of one segment of East Galleria Drive to West Galleria Drive? OpenWeb (https://maps.clarkcountynv.gov/openweb), Clark County's GIS, says it's East all the way to Lake Las Vegas Parkway.
itsken34 (2025-09-20 01:16:03+00:00): Error on my part.  I thought that I cancelled the request
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-09-20 06:44:08+00:00): It's okay, hahaha. I've changed it back to "East Galleria Drive." By the way, does your Tesla router still tell you to make that three-point turn?
itsken34 (2025-09-20 22:29:25+00:00): Thank You Thank You Thank You the issue has been fixed.  I have been trying for over a year to get this corrected and you did it in a few hours.  I greatly appreciate the attention you gave this issue.  The Tesla map is finally correct.
silversurfer83 (2025-09-20 09:11:34+00:00): Hi there :)

the Café in southern Germany looks like a double entry. Are you sure we need the bakery next to the already existing cafe?

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172183170
majestixx-de (2025-09-23 03:21:56+00:00): Thanks for the hint. Yes it was redundant. I removed mine: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172322182
silversurfer83 (2025-09-23 03:37:23+00:00): Thank you

Safe travels
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-09-20 12:24:18+00:00): Hi!

Unmarked crossings are added so pedestrian routing works and is realistic. In Quebec, it is legal to cross the street at any intersection except where there is a no-foot sign, which is rare. I will have to revert your changeset.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-09-20 12:27:06+00:00): Also, the sidewalks were carefully aligned using official geodesic data, so please do not realign ways unless you can verify that your alignement/imagery offset is accurate. Thanks!
Ashes SAF (2025-09-19 22:45:24+00:00): Wrong description. Edited steps.
Gregory Peony (2025-09-20 01:38:51+00:00): Hi, all footpritns you mapped are valid and appropriately shaped, thet could be a touch more accurate. Exclude the shadow a building casts on the ground from its footprint and trace slightly smaller than the roof; this accounts for the overhang and gives you a buffer for any change in shape when squaring. Thank you for your contribution.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172186169
MassCartog (2025-09-20 15:11:03+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. In this change set it looks like you removed what seem to be real foot ways and Alleys that seem to exist on the ground. You also dragged a node on Stonecat Court out of place so the road looks like it bends where it really does not. 

Could you explain what you are trying to do here?
fsb1 (2025-09-20 16:03:46+00:00): Hi, thx for reviewing my changes.  I removed the foot ways because they don't really exist now.  they might've existed before the homes were built but they're not there now.

I'll take another look at Hammerstone Alley but I don't believe it's actually parallel to Bluegill St, I think it's perpendicular.
fsb1 (2025-09-20 16:04:25+00:00): Idk what I did to Stonecat Ct, I'll have to look at that again.  It might've been accidental.
Yitzchak M (2025-09-20 00:46:36+00:00): The creator of this way forgot to include the Israel Trail. I simply added the Israel trail as a relation connected to this way.
Gregory Peony (2025-09-20 04:39:01+00:00): I mapped the T shaped building here as a rectangle. I think the southern part is likely vegetation becasue the shadow is so large in comparison to other buildings.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172186403
Ricken Lazlo Hale (2025-09-20 04:55:00+00:00): Makes sense.  Thank you!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172186403