piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Sébastien Pi (2026-05-25 13:13:18+00:00): Bonjour Sheraf,

Si c’est privé, il faut mieux mettre private que no. La signification n’est pas la même (dans le 2e, c’est soit illégal, soit impossible techniquement).
Je viens de corriger.

Bonne journée
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-04-30 20:40:15+00:00): Selam. Değişiklik açıklamanıza sadece bir nokta koyuyorsunuz. Kısa bir açıklama yazmamanızın sebebi nedir? 
Örneğin bu değişikliğe "252 numaralı otobüs hattının durakları düzenlendi." cümlesini yazmak, yarım dakikanızı bile almazdı.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
LateNightTone (2026-04-30 15:12:11+00:00): Oops, I meant note 4918056
divaddivag (2026-05-01 05:35:03+00:00): Bonjour Père Forez,

Cette stèle est une borne d'un circuit touristique dit 'Pegasus Trail' autour de points d'intérêt concernant les parachutages/affrontements autour de Bénouville par les unités de la 6e Airborne. Il en existe une autre ici qui mérite d'être corrigé d'ailleurs: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4432740837 et devant le musée il me semble. Rien de plus à ma connaissance, ni même d'informations ou autres descriptions au sujet de ce Pegasus Trail. Bref, un reliquat du passé et au demeurant tout sauf un 'mémorial de la 6e Airborne'. C'est une anomalie dans la base de donnée de MGW qui je pense va être retirée à un moment ou un autre. Je vais y aller faire tour...
divaddivag (2026-05-07 09:41:07+00:00): Je viens de corriger le noeud qui n'est pas un war_memorial: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4432740837

J'ai déposé une photo de la stèle d'Hérouvillette/Bréville ici: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Orientation_table_Pegasus_Trail-2-Herouvilette.jpg . J'aurais du emmener une brosse métallique et un peu de Mir!
PèreForez (2026-05-08 22:15:51+00:00): Si je comprends bien, tu as complété ce truc de Pegasus qui est à Ranville (avec sa photo d'un état lisible) et tu as pris la photo de celui d'HérouviletteBréville. Est-ce que ça veut dire que tu m'invites à reprendre les attributs de ce dernier et mettre ta référence de photo ? ou bien tu t'en charges toi-même ?
divaddivag (2026-05-09 03:23:28+00:00): Oui j'ai corrigé Ranville avec ce que je pense être les bon tags et je peux le faire à Hérouvillette si cela te va. Tu es le primo-contributeur donc je n'allais pas le faire sans ton accord. J’enlèverais aussi le ref:FR:MemGenWeb, puisque la fiche est je pense amenée à être retirée de votre base de données. Il n'y a pas urgence!
PèreForez (2026-05-09 09:22:41+00:00): Pas de problème, je ne suis venu sur cet objet que de manière incidente, n'étant pas l'auteur du relevé MGW, et le "travail" que je mène consiste essentiellement à localiser précisément les relevés MGW et à vérifier qu'ils sont bien répertoriés dans OSM. Donc étant aussi l'auteur des photos tu es mieux placé que moi pour qualifier ces objets "Pégasus". Je vais transmettre les résultats de ta recherche à MGW, à l'auteur du relevé et au responsable régional
wislander (2026-04-30 15:23:05+00:00): I didn't pay attention to the iD auto-added sources. Bing Streetside was the actual source used.
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-01 09:43:22+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
is the following name real?
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-01 09:43:19+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
is the following name real?
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-01 09:43:25+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
is the following name real?
Dimitar155_bot (2026-04-30 16:02:14+00:00): Някои спирки са били със сбъркани кодове в таблицата, ще ги оправя по-късно днес.
Dimitar155_bot (2026-04-30 16:37:54+00:00): готово

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182041621
Fraxi (2026-07-17 16:55:49+00:00): Мите, виж колко грозно звучат английските имена на спирките на Гурко.
Dimitar155 (2026-07-18 07:09:32+00:00): Вече не е Йодис :)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-05 02:52:14+00:00): Remove SEO spam description=* and refine top-level tag to be more correct for POI in changeset 183671618

https://osm.org/changeset/183671618
jjyach (2026-04-30 16:10:04+00:00): No one here calls it the Centennial Freeway so that may just be a historical term.  It is indeed just known as C-470.  Then there is E-470 which is the toll road.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-05-01 01:15:23+00:00): According to Wikipedia and the CDOT website, portions of SH 470 were originally called "Centennial Parkway." I couldn't find any information about it being "designated" as "Centennial Freeway," unlike my state, which not only has a list of state-maintained highways but also has a map showing officially named highways. I'll move "Centennial Freeway" to alt_name=* and "C-470" to name=*.
Dimitar155 (2026-04-30 18:16:41+00:00): Здравейте и благодаря за редакцията!

Не е желателно да се изтриват търговски обекти, освен ако не са физически премахнати. Причината е че доста често на същите места се появяват нови магазини. Запазвайки точката, лесно може да се провери на терен след време дали на конкретното място има нещо ново.

По-добре е върху същата точка да се отбележи новия обект (ако има такъв) или да се отбележи като вакантен.

Поздрави,
Митко
lelepepe (2026-05-01 06:52:29+00:00): Здравейте!
Точно така - няма тези търговски обекти отдавна.
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-01 09:42:05+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
is the following name real?
jm428 (2026-04-30 16:13:07+00:00): also set building types to dorms and added www. to store url
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-01 05:14:37+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2537421693
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1051073850

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
willkmis (2026-04-30 20:50:29+00:00): Hi, it seems like you ignored the note= tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4348916993, Mens is not a branch and men;women is wrong on this store. The iD validator is useful but please exercise care before blindly agreeing with it.
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-01 07:32:58+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the following name real?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425035372/history/3
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446192482/history/2
Virginia Mahoney (2026-05-01 11:48:56+00:00): Yes, all three paths/changes are private property and are not for public access. I submitted all three yesterday
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-01 13:14:18+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your reply.

I was asking for the names of the mapped paths, not for the access-tagging information.

However, IMHO the name you added should be removed because of the restriction tags you also added.

Best regards.
Virginia Mahoney (2026-05-01 13:31:37+00:00): I don’t know what IMHO means, and the paths don’t have names. It’s private property.
Virginia Mahoney (2026-05-01 13:32:44+00:00): Do whatever you need to do to make the paths not show up as public access. We got People trespassing and I’m thinking it may because these “trails” are not marked as private property.
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-01 13:36:51+00:00): Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182074834
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-01 13:41:11+00:00): And finally corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182075041
iandees (2026-05-01 15:53:58+00:00): Hi! It looks like the website URL on node/3798001559 may have been copied from Google Maps (it contained Google tracking parameters). Please be careful not to copy information from Google into OpenStreetMap, as Google's data is copyrighted.
VisibleSouth (2026-05-01 18:54:28+00:00): Thanks for pointing that out; I thought I had copied the web URL ("Fishaways Beachfront ") correctly - and I'm glad you've already taken care of it.
eggie (2026-04-30 17:50:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  .. phone= altijd met +31.. beginnen.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-16 13:17:12+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184181758

https://osm.org/changeset/184181758
fs_LT (2026-05-28 04:35:04+00:00): If there is a sign, tag it correctly; otherwise, please revert it and join the discussions in the community about it.
Access Claims (komoot) (2026-06-02 12:18:57+00:00): Thank you for the feedback.

We have revisited both the case and the original report. Following our review, we have reverted the changes in question.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183543988
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-01 07:33:31+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Same again, is the following name real?
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-01 13:39:18+00:00): Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182074944
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-01 07:33:34+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Same again, is the following name real?
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-01 13:37:23+00:00): Corrected by changeset/182074834
hatul (2026-05-26 14:09:31+00:00): שלום ישי
מה הסיבה שמחקת את התמונות של המעיין שהיו בנקודה.
אם אתה רוצה להוסיף תמונות אתה מוזמן, אבל בדרך כלל סיבה למחוק תמונות של אחרים.
ישי סלומון "במרחק נגיעה מירושלים" (2026-06-02 12:07:26+00:00): שלום
אני מתנצל. לא הבנתי שאני מוחק אותה לכולם. חשבתי שרק בשמירת המסלול שלי. 
אשים לב לזה בעתיד. 
תודה על ההערה
ישי
LordGarySugar (2026-05-21 00:28:20+00:00): Hi, just a note to say that construction sites like this don't need anything in the name= tag, just a note is fine as you also added.
iandees (2026-05-01 15:54:18+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3720429886 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182081678, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 10:56:09+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, possibly sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184131292

https://osm.org/changeset/184131292
literan (2026-05-01 10:18:11+00:00): оно же вроде снова М2
empty_child (2026-05-01 10:51:52+00:00): Я по новостям свести не смог. Там вроде два заведения, но что какое не понял. Поэтому просто открыл заготовку
Helen_Polazava (2026-05-28 12:56:34+00:00): hello! is this road still relevant as a construction site? w4165504
Jarek 🚲 (2026-05-28 18:34:25+00:00): That road is currently blocked off as a temporary grandstand for the stadium has been built over it. I have surveyed this today and will update it in OSM shortly. I'll probably mark it as disused rather than under construction
Jarek 🚲 (2026-05-28 23:54:34+00:00): Made the change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183327958 - lots of fences and closured in the area

Let me know if anything is unclear!
Helen_Polazava (2026-05-29 07:06:51+00:00): Thanks for the detailed information!
eggie (2026-04-30 17:54:00+00:00): Dag Tactist, Hoe zit het met mofa en moped. Die worden nu ook gestopt met motor_vehicle=no
Hoe zit het met hulpdiensten.. emergency=yes ?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-30 17:55:29+00:00): Ook staat er nog een note open in OSM, 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5243642#map=15/51.58615/4.77912&layers=N
Tactist (2026-04-30 18:00:54+00:00): Goeie, ik heb de tags overgenomen van een changeset die eenzelfde bus-knip heeft doorgevoerd op de Markendaalseweg. Hier zijn deze tags ook niet aanwezig, hoewel mofa/moped/emergency wel zijn toegestaan. De cameracontrole beboet deze voertuigen niet.

De bebording en markeringen op het wegdek zijn nog tijdelijk (dit wegvak wacht op herinrichting na voltooien bouwprojecten) waardoor dit wellicht niet helemaal duidelijk is. Ik zal het voor beiden busknippen goedzetten.
eggie (2026-04-30 18:03:27+00:00): 👍
Tactist (2026-04-30 18:08:45+00:00): Doorgevoerd in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182044931#map=18/51.586875/4.775199
detective-fiasco (2026-04-30 17:41:47+00:00): This fixes spelling of railway signal states on combined, combined_repeated, main and main_repeated signals in Czechia
カシオペア (2026-04-30 19:06:08+00:00): Hi,
What is wrong with mapping driveways? You could additionally mark them as private, but I don't see why they couldn't be mapped.
Akukartta (2026-05-01 04:34:02+00:00): If a house is located right beside the public road and there is no actual driveway but the front yard, that short strip of driveway on the map does not give any useful information. Only thing it does is make the map more cluttered. For example if you arrive in such location and address, you can clearly see where you can enter the property.
On the other hand if the house is located further away from the address road and it's not necessarily clear how to enter the property, then it is useful to draw the driveway. In Finland we might have driveways or access roads to a property that might be even hundreds of meters long. Then it is endeed useful to draw those roads to the map. But not those short ones for properties located right beside the address road.
I'm also pretty sure the is a somewhat clear concensus on this matter in Finnish OSM mapping community. It is close the principal used in the official Finnish maps from Maanmittauslaitos.
I hope the clears the issue a bit.
カシオペア (2026-05-01 05:26:27+00:00): That makes sense, but I have seen plenty of short driveways mapped elsewhere, which is why I thought there is no problem with them.
Akukartta (2026-05-01 10:07:30+00:00): Yes, there are places where enthusiastic mappers have been eager to map anything possible to OSM. And there is not any centralized checking system that someone would always be there to correct things. That is one downside to this kind of open community managed service. Anyone can become a mapper and sometimes new mappers can do quite significant damage to the map data. It is other community users that have to fix them.
I just happened to notice the driveways you had drawn because I live in that area and I check the OSM from time to time if there are any updates to the area close to my home. And to be clear, your updates were not a big mess or error. That's just something we don't usually do in Finland. Other countries may have different kinds of guidelines for OSM mapping.
カシオペア (2026-05-01 11:19:14+00:00): I actually didn't draw the driveways, I  just happened to notice the deletion, and wanted to double-check the reasoning. I personally believe there's no reason they couldn't be mapped, since they're details that do exist, and don't really clutter the map. But if there are actual guidelines for this, the deletions are of course fine then.

The problems you mentioned are sadly quite real, and sometimes they even apply for long-time mappers as well. In any case, thanks for replying with the extra information
lankapuhelin (2026-05-13 18:03:00+00:00): I don't think "It's not done this way (currently)" is a good enough reasoning to remove something that someone has mapped - something that exists on the ground in reality, ie. is valid to map. With such reasoning the map would remain blank forever, as in the beginning, and no new kinds of features would ever being to be mapped, since "that's the way it's done (currently)".
Rom1 (2026-05-13 19:18:43+00:00): Hi, could you precise what is the subject of this memorial ? Have you a photo to share ? Thanks
Evoluxe (2026-05-27 06:22:14+00:00): Hi,

Yes, this is a commemorative plaque in memory of the victims of a fire in Wintzenheim on 9 August 2023. 

I do have a photo, but I’m not sure what the best way is to upload it here.
Rom1 (2026-05-27 09:18:06+00:00): Hi, perhaps, you could upload your photo on https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/ ? Thanks
detective-fiasco (2026-04-30 17:53:23+00:00): Fixes spelling and unifies shunting signal states as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:railway:signal:shunting
カシオペア (2026-04-30 19:01:56+00:00): Hi,
Why delete so many handmade features with lower quality imports? Also, the "bare" rock areas are not inner features of the nature reserve, and most of them are not bare at all. This was taken into account with the existing bare rock areas created with a better source, but now they have been deleted. To me it seems very questionable to replace existing data with imports on an active mapping area in the first place
Lieckio (2026-04-30 20:01:30+00:00): Which ones were higher quality? Like I replied to you in the messages, I mainly replace unsourced or less accurate versions, where MML data > something random.

Openstreetmap is a open, group effort. You don't own what you've marked. I add thousands of things at a time, I don't "replace" handmade features. Plenty of new stuff there.

Nature reserve is an error, some of them got grouped to the nature reserve instead of the forest in error. I haven't had time to fix it yet. Because like I said, there's thousands of imports at a time.
カシオペア (2026-05-01 05:44:00+00:00): At least the areas inside the nature reserve were very recently updated based on the city's high quality aerials and a survey. The problem is you can't just use MML Topographic Map alone to decide that some data is less accurate, especially when said data has been updated within the last year or so. 

In my opinion you should have checked data like that a lot more closely (even in your other recent changesets), as I personally know that it is way more accurate to real life than MML data. Adding data is of course fine, but it seems like you have deleted a lot of old data too, without good reasons.
Lieckio (2026-05-01 07:23:43+00:00): Good to know, I suspect I might have not noticed to check those properly in the nature reserve - considering I didn't notice I added them to a wrong relation as well.

I have mainly removed unsourced and "source=bing" bare rocks that are misaligned etc. from other areas, but I will take your point into account in the next import and check more diligently in the future before removing already placed features in highly traced areas.
カシオペア (2026-05-01 07:49:22+00:00): Thank you for the consideration, I don't see people use source-tags often these days which is why I haven't added them. Is it okay with you if I undelete some data which I believe is more correct than the MML data? I don't care too much about most of the areas, but there are 6 ways that I would add back. I can also fix the nature reserve at the same time unless you already fixed it.

MML data might be the most accurate data in most places, but in any case aerial imagery should also be considered in my opinion, especially before deleting newly added data (or any data that is being replaced with an import).
Lieckio (2026-05-01 10:09:21+00:00): I have noticed as well that people don't mark sources that often. From now on I will check the changeset sources more carefully to see that I don't end up deleting sourced information.

And please do; I don't own the edits and as I do them in masses, more accurate data is always better than my mass uploads. I apreciate fixes and repairs, especially when I've ended up making a mess of things :)

I have revised my work method a bit to take more existing information into account. Previous imports I've done were more rural, so there were some loopholes in the process that caused a bit of a mess. Hopefully it won't happen again in the future, or at least happens less.

I've fixed some of the relations in that area, but if you're going to be bringing back data to that area, it's probably better if you handle that area. I'll keep me updates more towards Kangasala for now.

I am currently working the M4212L-tile from NRL.fi, so that gives you the rough maximum extend of the imports I am bringing in.
カシオペア (2026-05-01 11:07:49+00:00): Good to know, thanks. I of course have no problems with the work you do overall, but large imports that include replacing old data do have their risks (even though you mostly add new data). I didn't mean to make it sound like my edits can't be re-edited (or removed if the environment changes), I just don't like it if it is done with the wrong reasoning.

For now I just did the minimal edits I mentioned before, so feel free to update the relations etc. more if you want.
iandees (2026-05-01 15:55:02+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13630115978 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182081713, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-01 09:41:27+00:00): Hi 445577, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind removing many nane:*=* here?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 10:54:06+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184131222

https://osm.org/changeset/184131222
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-01 09:41:04+00:00): Hi 445577, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind removing many nane:*=* here?
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-05-01 20:35:57+00:00): Merhaba. İsimleri neden sildiniz?
santamariense (2026-06-17 21:59:52+00:00): Perfeito, Thiagowl.

Você pode adicionar o cep também à geometria por meio do campo/tag postal_code

Se tiver dúvidas, pergunte.

Bons mapeamentos!
eggie (2026-04-30 19:14:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Je hoeft geen adressen toe te voegen aan gebouwomtrekken. Er zijn adresnodes.
Ik zal het adres weer verwijderen.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Cat2006 (2026-05-24 16:09:30+00:00): Предлагам връщане на старите имена на спирките до смяна на табелите или поне подновяване на GTFS данните, за да не праща в заблуда хората. Новите имена могат да се маркират като proposed:
Dimitar155 (2026-05-24 17:36:52+00:00): Решението е влязло в сила. Това че се мотат една година с този списък, а сега един месец не могат да принтират и залепят 300 стикера си е техен проблем според мен.
MassCartog (2026-04-30 22:41:53+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. Features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
OpenCode (2026-05-03 14:42:53+00:00): Ciao. Perché hai rimosso il tipo so accesso per persone con disabilità dagli attraversamenti pedonali?
pierfrancescop (2026-05-06 11:45:27+00:00): Ciao intendi kerb=lowered? Avevo interpretato male il tag, pensavo si intendesse 'rialzato'
OpenCode (2026-05-06 12:05:19+00:00): Sì. Almeno quello l'ho notato. Non so se è stato tolto anche altro. Dovresti ripristinarli, per favore.
soltosirius (2026-04-30 19:01:02+00:00): station names: https://glassborocamdenline.com/#interactive-map