piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PPete2 (2026-07-09 10:05:05+00:00): Servus @Nazom, möchtest du bitte die im Forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/boundary-place-fur-weiler/144394/31 beschlossenen Änderungen in St.Agatha bitte selber durchführen, bevor weiterhin so engagiert in Linz weiter arbeitest. Oder sollen das deinen Kollegen für dich kulanterweise in ihrer Freizeit erledigen?
SzymonH (2026-05-26 06:04:21+00:00): Gierdziejewskiego 5 nie będzie na razie ruszana. Są takie plany, ale chyba nawet nie złożyli wniosku do UM. https://www.facebook.com/kdauksz/posts/pfbid0WV2CFYTCdJn1Qqd9tDiKAgQ5JCWTsqCMXCvDZGKav4Nf1289JWSMqY4i4tXrzYssl
syntex (2026-07-13 00:28:19+00:00): ok, z tego co widziałem niedawno to chyba ten biurowiec też jeszcze funkcjonuje?
SzymonH (2026-07-13 05:58:33+00:00): Tak, połowa nadal funkcjonuje. Jedynie to co ogrodzone płotem na razie będzie podlegać rozbiórce.
eggie (2026-05-20 08:03:36+00:00): Je zou de weg in/uitrit kunnen verdubbelen, want iets verder staat nog een slagboom en volgens mij een barrier= height_restrictor zie wiki  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dheight_restrictor

gr eggie
eggie (2026-05-20 08:04:18+00:00): .. en dan vervolgens oneway=yes op die stukken
BC168 (2026-05-20 19:31:51+00:00): Danke für die Korrekturen. Betr. Öffnungszeiten siehe Kommentar zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182898837
Jakope (2026-05-21 07:43:58+00:00): Ergänzt bei Getränkewelt https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182961256

Beim Bäcker ist unklar, ob er an Feiertagen geöffnet hat. Daher keine Änderung.
BC168 (2026-05-21 13:44:10+00:00): Sieht gut aus jetzt, danke.

Beim Bäcker würde ich das als Kommentar erfassen:  PH unknown "siehe Aushang"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours/specification#explain:comment

Von Programmen, die opening_hours auswerten, sollte das dann anstelle von "geöffnet" oder "geschlossen" angezeigt werden.
Jakope (2026-05-21 14:36:48+00:00): Erledigt mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182979633
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-19 21:03:41+00:00): #Vandalism
bxl-forever_repair (2026-05-19 23:29:31+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182901581
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-20 05:48:24+00:00): User blocked by https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20577
eggie (2026-05-20 20:07:33+00:00): Hi,

BING is outdated. Please use pdok actueel in the Netherlands.
Don't trust Strava as a source removing roads.
Greetz,
eggie
kOSMofant (2026-05-20 21:05:07+00:00): Bedankt voor je feedback. Ik zal voortaan PDOK gebruiken, hier mogelijk misgegaan doordat nog wat zoeken is in JOSM (gebruik ik nog niet zo lang). Strava zal ik dan inderdaad voor verwijderen van paden niet meer gebruiken.
eggie (2026-05-20 21:12:08+00:00): 👍
BC168 (2026-05-20 19:28:34+00:00): Auch an Feiertagen geöffnet, wenn diese auf Mo-Fr fallen? Wenn nicht, bitte noch ";PH off" ergänzen. Danke.
Jakope (2026-05-21 07:24:55+00:00): Ergänzt mit changeset 182960507
eggie (2026-05-20 20:09:38+00:00): Please don't trust strava.
You are familiar here?

Greetz,
eggie
kOSMofant (2026-05-20 21:09:52+00:00): Thanks. Wel bekend in gebied niet specifiek voor/tijdens deze bewerking ter plekke geweest, was achteraf misschien toch beter geweest dan.
Groet
yelisey90 (2026-05-21 12:43:46+00:00): fixed properly now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182974495
Lieckio (2026-05-19 21:19:45+00:00): Yay or nay? Feels like a clean and useful method of doing this, even though not really common in Finland as far as I can see.
lankapuhelin (2026-05-20 06:41:53+00:00): Briefly explain it?
Lieckio (2026-05-20 07:36:38+00:00): Good point. :D

On the Hallituskatu side, in this edit, the landuse=commercial follows the pavement/roadside edge, rather than the current mixed use of following building outlines and occasionally slightly outside them.

Berlin - which I've used as an example of great mapping per recommends by others - mostly does it this way. My next update slightly adds to this, making it perhaps easier to see what's going on.
lankapuhelin (2026-05-20 09:59:03+00:00): Looks very good. It does seem somewhat work-intensive though, but that's up to the individual mapper and how they like to spend their time mapping. But a slight criticism: there are consequenses to other mappers too, as there are more features that are attached (landuse areas connected to parking areas, for example, and kerbs everywhere, which hasn't been done much in Finland), quick edits become more laborious with more detaching and such required. Especially ID edits become more difficult this way. Thus newbs and casual mappers can be dissuaded from doing mapping.
Lieckio (2026-05-20 10:32:15+00:00): Thank you; I feel it adds clarity when comparing various aerial shots etc. as not everyone uses Tampere City aerials and maps. Easier to position survey data and other aerial data.

When it comes to difficulty... that's a good point. But at the same time, is there a limit to data accuracy? And frankly, I'd hope newbies don't go straight to editing city centers and road/landuse data - there's inherently plenty of things that can go wrong.

But we'll see if this gets further criticism in the future. I'm happy with any decision that comes as a result of a discussion. I'll probably edit these in for a few more blocks in the downtown, so we can have a broader view on the effects and will then bring it to the discussion forum.
Lieckio (2026-05-20 10:36:35+00:00): Forgot to note; the kerbs tagging is indeed laborous. I wanted to test how much work it takes, as I noted them down when surveying. But it's a lot of work for not much benefit (currently).

I'd probably settle (for now at least) to just tagging the crossing-ways with a kerb tag where it connects the area:highway. This way that data is usable for any software that considers them.
lankapuhelin (2026-05-20 11:33:59+00:00): True about kerbs - I feel they only bring worthwhile value as nodes on highways (ie. where a way crosses a kerb). I will be looking forward to your forum post. In any case, the exact location of landuse borders is a very arbitrary matter and I don't think it's possible, or at least easy, to assign a right/wrong way of mapping them. This also means it's also hard or impossible to argue _against_ the Berlin method. But we shall see what discussion there will be on the community forum.
Sakari_N (2026-05-20 13:12:32+00:00): I think this is good Lieckio! When mapping landuse city block-by-block, the edge is very arbitary, but with this method It has physically defined border. 

I think other option would be to have landuse completely detached from anything else, and using larger landuse areas that also cover smaller roads (basically thinking that highway=residential is also part of landuse=residential)
felipeeugenio (2026-05-20 14:14:19+00:00): Hola. Así se llama la calle o el condominio? Los nombres no son traspasables. Solo para aclarar.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182900291
mga_geo (2026-05-20 04:33:49+00:00): Bonjour Thomas,
C'est compliqué de mettre à jour des gros carrefours, bravo !
J'ai trouvé une relation bus cassée: r400667.
Peux-tu le faire ? j'ai peur de faire des bêtises.
Marc
mga_geo (2026-05-20 04:39:11+00:00): Cela semble avoir eu aussi un impact sur r1262678.
Thomas Petillon (2026-05-20 10:32:12+00:00): Bonjour Marc,

Oui en effet, dès qu'on commence à vouloir être précis, ça prend du temps de cartographier entièrement des carrefours comme ceux-ci !

J'ai réparé les relations de bus dans le changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182920288
Merci d'avoir regardé après moi et de m'avoir signalé mes erreurs. :) J'ai passé en revue les lignes de bus avant d'uploader, mais de toute évidence je n'ai pas été exhaustif.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2080923 est cassée aussi, mais je passerai avant sur place pour voir si le marquage a été adapté recémment.

Thomas
Frans S (2026-05-26 09:31:27+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
You regularly cluster buildings!
Please map each building as an individual building.
Best regards
aighes (2026-05-20 00:53:26+00:00): Hello Casteo and welcome to OSM. I stumbled across your edit, as a place=city in OSM is a settlement with population of 20000+ which seems far of for the area you added. Further I can't find anything while searching for Mettersfield. Can you provide any sources about what Mettersfield might be?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182901931
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-19 23:21:04+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11468157505
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1517255394

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Udarian (2026-05-20 00:16:18+00:00): looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
jtracey (2026-05-19 23:24:41+00:00): Addresses https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5296202
Wildsharky (2026-05-21 05:41:35+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:182917706
bxl-forever (2026-05-20 01:06:18+00:00): Thanks for the information.

Here are some tips to improve your future contributions.

In this edit, you merely removed the name of that restaurant. The map will therefore show "a restaurant with no name". This is probably not what you wanted.

Again, if a business closes down, one should remove its tags.  That means… removing the tags that say that it is a restaurant.  That will make the restaurant icon disappear.

I fixed your edit.
Udarian (2026-05-20 00:16:05+00:00): looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
HellMap (2026-05-21 10:33:58+00:00): You have added a ford in the middle of a residential road again. You have not replied to your previous messages about this issue. I have reverted this edit.
mapeditor11 (2026-06-05 20:35:01+00:00): @hellmap there's a culvert beneath the road not a ford, the issue gets resolved by default to a ford on osm -i didn't set a ford intentionally.
HellMap (2026-06-06 09:32:20+00:00): The editor or OSM does not resolve anything by default. The only way a ford is added is if you click the issue validator option to add it. The editor cannot know if it's a ford, a culvert, a bridge or a gap. Regardless, it is your responsibility to add the correct option and only if you know what it is.
Taya_S (2026-05-26 12:08:17+00:00): Restored valid address node without private information.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183204928
Dimitar155 (2026-05-20 07:46:18+00:00): Thank you for your edit!

Why did you add covered=no to sections of Tsar Simeon and Ovche pole streets? Did you mean to add another tag?

Happy mapping,
Dimitar
tguen (2026-05-23 00:53:55+00:00): Most of these edits are great! However please be careful when applying the editor's recommended changes, they are not always correct. For example:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391487047

The Hi-Lo hotel is not associated with Hostelling International

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/339789636

These parking lots are private employee parking, not park-and-ride lots.
Solaris07 (2026-05-23 14:06:12+00:00): The pathway linking Brindabella Way to Ocean Drive was removed in 2023 - as seen on Esri/Mapbox imagery and indicated by survey.
Maradona11 (2026-05-25 21:48:36+00:00): Thank you for pointing that out to us.  I will pass it on to the data owner at TfNSW - sourced from local councils.
ChangwooRyu (2026-05-25 03:46:34+00:00): 같은 분인 것 같은데 왜 자꾸 이 데이터를 임포트하는데 집착하는지 모르겠네요? 아직도 중복이 있고, 실제로는 문을 닫은 곳도 추가되어 있고,  네일샵과 피부미용실은 엄연히 OSM에서는 다른 태그로 만들어야 하는데도 불구하고 죄다 hairdresser로 해 놨음.
빵곰손 (2026-05-30 12:52:52+00:00): 좌표가 완전 엉망이고 15년전에 문 닫은 곳을 왜 입력하는거임? 20년 동안 놀이터였던 곳에 왜 피부미용실 찍어둔거지?

#5317527 이거 여기 문제네.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-20 04:54:11+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156119189
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394758067
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/868329137
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/868329165

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1914658799
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13647421339
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2840713881
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2823527030
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4924901598
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7702794380
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1267896788
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351212260
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386042840
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395357245
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/339574090
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395113861
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395114223

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Osiedle 1000-lecia":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288394449
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288394452
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288394453
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288394859

"Świętego Wawrzynca":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/759149371
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/759154702
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/761015848
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/761015859
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/761015861
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/761015862

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ChangwooRyu (2026-06-14 12:40:49+00:00): 죄다 중복임.
woodpeck (2026-05-20 07:00:55+00:00): Dear Joanes100, thank you for your contributions to OSM. However, many of the buildings you have drawn intersect each other, and overlap with the existing road network. This is not good enough for OpenStreetMap. Did the JOSM editor not warn you about these issues when uploading the data? I have tried to fix the problems that you have created but there were too many issues so I had to remove the building traces again.
蕉饼电脑 (2026-05-20 05:35:47+00:00): 不存在“动车首占站（长乐火车站）”名称，只有“地铁首占站（长乐火车站）”和“长乐火车站”。
woodpeck (2026-05-20 07:08:22+00:00): Dear tpgnsfjqm, any data import from a third-party source must be discussed with the community ahead of time, so that we can determine the quality of the data, the import process, and the license compatibility. The data you have imported here is of low quality (there are POIs in the middle of green spaces like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13851292065) and there are many POIs at the same location. I will therefore revert that import. In the future pleae adhere to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import when you want to import data.
1Raven (2026-06-06 14:53:38+00:00): For clarity: I added addresses to existing houses. Added a placeholder building since the aerial imagery is outdated.
1Raven (2026-06-06 14:52:57+00:00): For clarity: I added addresses to existing houses.
1Raven (2026-06-06 14:52:34+00:00): For clarity: I added addresses to existing houses. Added a placeholder building since the aerial imagery is outdated.
Gregory Peony (2026-05-23 18:55:01+00:00): Hi, you identified buildings in the imagery. 

Buildings tend to be round or square, only map them as otherwise if you have a good reason to believe that they are not e.g. they are at the corner of a non orthogonal junction. Buildings with the blue/green or light grey roofs are most likely square, press q to square them. The ones that look like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1517325763 , and the cluster of buildings it belongs to are round, press o to circularise them. 

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182910265
BerryTrails (2026-05-20 10:41:09+00:00): Hi BaudouinCanal, on what basis did you connect the road? Did you properly verify the imagery? There is clearly no visible connection between those roads, so how could you connect them without valid evidence? Please verify the imagery carefully before making such edits.
BaudouinCanal (2026-05-21 18:30:11+00:00): Hi BerryTrails,
I added this connection as there are two visible turn lanes in Mapbox Satellite and Esri World Imagery for drivers on the right lane and used this as justification that drivers on the far right lane can make a slight right turn onto the residential way while drivers in the other right lane can make a left onto the tertiary way. I noticed you removed this connection and I can defer to your edits if you believe these highways should be disconnected.
eggie (2026-05-21 19:52:07+00:00): Dag C Batenburg Bedoel je wellicht destination ipv motor_vehicle=designated. Dat zetten we eigenlijk niet op reguliere wegen.

Ik heb designated verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
Dodko (2026-05-26 07:53:20+00:00): Adresa je už v budove, vtedy sa nedáva duplicitne do POI
SekeRob (2026-05-20 10:50:45+00:00): Hi,

This large building looks dilapidated, anything but a ruin though. I've just mapped the tower missing in the outline, very well visible in MapBox 2026 and some crossings and marked stop spots while there

happy mapping
SekeRob
Taya_S (2026-05-22 09:55:11+00:00): Hello,

I have reverted both your changesets in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183014061

Please be aware that OpenStreetMap is an online shared map. All edits are visible to everyone else and should reflect the real world. 

Best regards,  
Taya Snijder
Halfix (2026-05-21 06:34:18+00:00): Hi, I'm not an expert on long-distance traffic highways , so I'll steer clear of that, but I originate from this area, which is why I noticed the change. Destination “Enzlar” is only correct for way 1517351360 if you turn left. For those turning right (which, according to the latest aerial views, is also possible on this link), the destination is “Schweinfurt” and/or “Gerolzhofen”— can’t tell what’s currently signposted there.
World_Winner (2026-05-28 13:37:15+00:00): Hello Halfix,

Thank you for the clarification and for sharing your local knowledge of the area. I understand your point that the destination “Enzlar” is only appropriate while turning left. For turning right “Schweinfurt” or “Gerolzhofen” destinations should be applied.

I will review the junction and destination tagging again to ensure it better reflects the actual signposted directions.

Thank you again for the helpful feedback, and happy mapping!
rarad74 (2026-05-20 07:54:18+00:00): Salut. Tiam mai spus/recomandat parca nu doar odata. Te rog nu mai folosi imaginile Bing pe Bucuresti si imprejurimile din partea de nord deoarece sunt foarte vechi ( peste 8-9 ani) si nici foarte bine pozitionate nu sunt. Mapbox sunt mai noi si foarte bine pozitionate. ESRI standard sunt cele mai noi ( de anul trecut din vara), dar nu sunt foarte bine pozitionate. O zi usoara sa ai.
Teo Cata (2026-05-20 10:02:39+00:00): Salut. In primul rand, nu cred ca mi-ai mai scris pana acum, cel putin nu legat de imagery_used. In al doilea rand, multumesc pentru sfaturi, nu stiam diferentele intre ele, o sa tin cont pe viitor. In al treilea rand, cred ca e o confuzie legata de edit-ul la care ai comentat pentru ca el este in zona de est, nu de nord. O zi buna!
rarad74 (2026-05-20 10:13:48+00:00): Salut din nou. Ma bucur ca in sfarsit ai raspuns. Am mai scris un comentariu la un edit cu un ton mai acid un pic. Sper sa nu iti pice "greu". Am spus Bucuresti in primul rand si toate partea de nord si acum completez nord-est. Imaginile Bing sunt foarte vechi si desenezi evident gresit ca pozitie dupa ele. Ti-am atras atentia doar ca sa nu mai editezi in mod eronat din  acest punct de vedere. In mod surpsinzator pe opesntreetmap au inceput sa apara imagini mai noi decat la concurenta , alternad intre Mapbox si ESRI Standard. Dar intotdeauna Mapbox au fost mai bine centrate.
FajrAl (2026-05-20 15:52:58+00:00): Tolong jangan skip tutorial interaktif iD editornya.
FroschForscher (2026-05-25 19:23:27+00:00): Hallo Pernycek, was ist die Quelle hierfür?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182913258
Pernycek (2026-05-26 07:04:08+00:00): Sorry, my bad. I fixed it.
FroschForscher (2026-05-26 15:32:11+00:00): Thanks.
fortera_au (2026-05-21 00:36:35+00:00): Hi, parking=yes is an incorrect tag, if you're trying to specify this location has parking, then the parking area should be mapped separately.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182913296
OlasMapy (2026-05-20 07:42:01+00:00): Bbox jak zwykle ogromny. Jedynie zostały zmapowane tereny przy ścieżce "Stanisława Horno-Popławskiego".
dmlls (2026-05-20 13:42:09+00:00): Hola @refcovers,

El nombre de la calle sigue siendo incorrecto (tiene una coma al final). Además, en OpenStreetMap existen una serie de valores aceptados por la comunidad:

- `shop=pool_covers` no es uno de ellos, y las aplicaciones que consumen de OpenStreetMap no van a saber interpretarlo. El valor correcto en este caso es https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:shop=swimming_pool.

- `product=Cubietas_de_pisicna` (aparte de las faltas de ortografía), tampoco es correcto. Aquí podrías poner `product=pool_covers`, aunque tampoco es un valor común.

Un saludo y cualquier duda, no dudes en preguntarnos.

Un saludo,
Diego
mavl (2026-05-21 12:49:12+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, почему у этих дорог статус highway=secondary?  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1517368006/history   
    
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1517368007/history
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-07 11:11:31+00:00): Reverted addition of SEO spam POI with blatant promotional description=*, an extremely misleading name=* and missing any other tags but a website=*

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183775083
silversurfer83 (2026-05-20 15:08:56+00:00): Hi :)

du hast ja "my eyes" schon als Quelle angegeben. Dann wäre es schön, wenn du im Kommentar einen hilfreicheren Text hinterlässt:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

happy mapping :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182914557
~Jhellico (2026-05-24 12:23:58+00:00): На лініях вулиць (highway=*) не потрібні теґи addr:*
eggie (2026-05-20 09:09:57+00:00): Dag Robin,

Een choker is gewoon een wegversmalling. Wanneer dit een tractorsluis is dan taggen we barrier=sump_buster met de nodeige accesstags erop.
motor_vehicle=agricultural
Nu routeert het nog gewoon voor regulier verkeer. 

Zie wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dsump_buster

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-05-20 09:15:40+00:00): 
. En dan evt emergency=yes
Geen idee of een ambulance hier kan passeren.
eggie (2026-05-20 08:32:31+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.
Niet valide tagging waar OSMniets mee kan heb ik verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
habi (2026-05-21 15:40:06+00:00): Ciao gfag
Ich bin hier, weil du `review_requested=yes` hast, und ich diese Changesets in Bern anschaue :)
Bei diesem Punkt fehlt laut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Dmassage noch ein `shop=massage`, damit das auch als Massage gefunden wird.
`massage=thai` ist "nur" die Spezialisierung.
Gruss,
habi
habi (2026-05-21 15:40:25+00:00): Ich hab' das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182982419 hinzugefügt.
gfag (2026-05-21 15:54:20+00:00): Ich danke Dir, habe wohl noch viel zu lernen/zu lesen.
Gut hab ichs zur review angehakt.
LG
Alex
rempshaener (2026-05-20 18:25:24+00:00): Hallo,

zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13851830304:
Bitte den Namen entfernen.
Die
natural=water
water=reservoir
ergeben im Zusammenhang mit einer Zisterne keinen Sinn. Bitte löschen.

Viele Grüße