piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Allroads (2025-04-01 15:50:48+00:00): Deze weg lijkt mij eerder een driveway dan residential naar 64 en heeft geen naam, niet van de gemeente.

Als je kijkt naar kadastrale percelen, dan zie je dat de oprijlaan op hetzelfde perceel ligt als het huis.

https://app.pdok.nl/viewer/#x=201711.39&y=497296.88&z=16.0000&background=Luchtfoto&layers=97cf6a64-9cfc-4ce6-9741-2db44fd27fca;Perceel;standaard:perceel;1



https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316927693

Ik zie dat je in ID, Bing gebruikt,
Het beste is om in Nederland PDOK 8 cm luchtfoto te gebruiken.
CvK024 (2025-04-07 08:54:38+00:00): Dank voor je feedback. Ik ben het met je eens om de straat van deze weg af te halen.  

Goede tip om de kadastrale kaart ook te gebruiken. Dat had ik nog niet gedaan. 

Klopt dat ik ID gebruik om deze mutaties door te voeren. Ik vond het daar zelf fijner om deze mutaties in door voeren. Ik gebruik ook de Nederland PDOK 8 cm luchtfoto als bron om naar te kijken, maar nu was dat blijkbaar niet het geval zie ik bij 'imagery_used'. 

Ik maak ook gebruik van ArcGIS Pro (commercieel GIS-pakket van ESRI) om daar kaartlagen in te bekijken. Voeg de kaartlaag met de kadastrale grenzen daaraan toe. Sinds 2000 ben ik werkzaam in het GIS werkveld en heb ook vanaf het begin van mijn carrière veel met luchtfoto's gewerkt. Ben daar dus 'aardig' bekend mee. ;-) Heb er zelfs mijn stageverslag speciaal op gericht.

Met vriendelijke groet, CvK024
Gregory Peony (2025-04-02 04:18:24+00:00): Both of these buildings are valid and appropriately squared, though could have been a touch smaller.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164323467
bxl-forever (2025-03-31 12:19:23+00:00): Hello,

Make sure to keep the names in sync when you use the operator tag.

The name of the school (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/211697420) is "École Communale de Genval-La Bruyère" but the operator tag you added for the parking area is "École Communale de la Bruyère".  One of them must be changed.

Hope this helps.
Yog Sot (2025-04-01 12:41:32+00:00): fajne miejsce^^ tylko na fragmencie to sa jednokierunkowe (z e=definicji) pasy ruchu rowerowego, a potem jest dwukierukowa droga dla rowerów, która mozna mylić z jednokierunkową. 
potem to wyklikam ;]
db-ak (2025-04-01 12:45:22+00:00): Nie wiem czy dobrze rozumiem, chodziło mi jedynie o to że,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1373330864 do tego miejsca jest DR normalnie, dopiero za zjazdem jest zakaz wjazdu pod prąd w pas rowerowy w jezdni.
Yog Sot (2025-04-01 20:45:13+00:00): zrobiłem, 
chodzi o to, że pasy ruchu rowerowe taguje się na jezdni, a jednokierunkowe drogi rowerowe są jak fajtycznei stoją znaki i faktycznie w dwóch miejscach stoją :)
Porobiłem tez sporo tactile_paving tam gdzie jest, czyli zwłaszcza w obrębie przejść pieszych, bo to jest chyba jedyny argument, który powstrzymuje dziką rządze łączenia rowerówki z pieszą w jedna kreskę, ale tu powinny być dwie :}
eggie (2025-03-31 11:47:09+00:00): Oke, maar dan gaat emergency=yes niet helpen.
Dan zul je op de afslagbeperking (relatie) except=emergency moeten toevoegen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-31 11:50:47+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast op de relaties met except=emergency
wies1 (2025-03-31 11:01:50+00:00): Hinweis:

Habe diesen Changeset bei meinem Post in der Community
"Ergaenzung von fehlenden Addressteilen - Addressbearbeitung"
als Beispiel angegeben
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-31 11:00:55+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1373331867

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-31 11:00:56+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12715728036

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ivanbranco (2026-02-01 09:15:26+00:00): Hi SekeRob,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331252348/history

here there's a conditional tag without condition: delivery:conditional=yes

Is delivery always permitted? In such case delivery=yes is enough. The conditional tags need a condition, e.g. "yes @ (Mo 08:00-16:00)" ecc.
DD1GJ (2025-03-31 11:33:50+00:00): Revert, SPAM
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-23 06:57:53+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184461670

https://osm.org/changeset/184461670
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
DD1GJ (2025-03-31 11:35:43+00:00): Revert, SPAM
Jordi MF (2025-03-31 17:52:55+00:00): Hola,

¿Por qué has eliminado los caminos que se observan en la ortofoto? Entiendo que querías cambiar la clasificación, pero no es correcto eliminar las vías. Hay que modificarlas para mantener el historial.

Por otra parte, se trata de un camino que sirve para acceder a campos de cultivo además de algunas casas. El camino está homigonado, po lo que no tiene la calidad de una carretera "unclassified". Al tratarse de un camino agrícola, debe de etiquetarse completamente como "track".

Po rútimo, el tramo de acceso a unas viviendas, podría clasificarse como calle "residential" o como calle de acceso "servic", pero tampoco como "unclassified".

Saludos.
eggie (2025-03-31 11:15:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Bedankt voor je bijdrage Beperk het gebied svp van je edits tot bv een straat.
Maak geen adressen aan in OSM, maar tag bij op de bestaande adresnodes. Nu geven meer adressen verwarring. 

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
MrBlondeBlonde (2025-03-31 11:18:17+00:00): Thanks, Eggie. I'm moving away from Google Maps and now adding all my saved locations in OSM.
eggie (2025-03-31 11:20:35+00:00): Fine... I merged some of your constributions with the BAG addressnodes.
Greetz,
eggie
DD1GJ (2025-03-31 11:37:47+00:00): Revert, SPAM
Gregory Peony (2025-07-11 21:21:02+00:00): A generall improvement of map data but some footpritns are still not as accurate as the imagery allows them to be. You correctly deleted footpritns which represented temporal yurts.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164324949
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 01:16:52+00:00): Hold alt to prevent the creation of shared nodes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164324998
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 01:17:26+00:00): scratch last. Hold ctrl. to prevent the creation of common nodes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164324998
Gregory Peony (2025-03-31 16:33:06+00:00): Thanks for squaring these footprints but when doing this be sure to check the accuracy and validity of footprints for example the Wester most one in this changeset is still significantly larger than it should be.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164325031
Gregory Peony (2025-07-11 21:19:02+00:00): You improved the accuracy of all building footprints here and added valid and accurate footprints. Well done! Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164325125
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 01:16:24+00:00): You identified buildings in imagery. You deleted valid footprints which could have been modified instead.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164325143
eggie (2025-03-31 11:29:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Ik heb twee panden en de adresnodes verwijderd. Dus ook landuse=residential...  
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
ti-lo (2025-05-12 15:29:38+00:00): There's a description for "balloon tagging", why do you "invent" another one ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Balloons
Gregory Peony (2025-03-31 16:00:14+00:00): You correctly addressed a highway building overlap. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164325356
DD1GJ (2025-03-31 11:40:40+00:00): Revert, SPAM
Colbertson (2025-03-31 11:45:46+00:00): Vai citur arī laiki mainīti?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/642477109
Hidoo00 (2025-04-09 13:19:54+00:00): Hej! 
capacity=150 kan väl knappast stämma? Jag kan se fyra nya laddstolpar, borde väl bli 8 platser som kan utnyttjas samtidigt?
NeisBot (2025-03-31 11:36:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
NeisReview (2025-04-06 17:55:00+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164603130
NeisReview (2025-04-06 17:56:19+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164603183
rskedgell (2025-03-31 22:58:20+00:00): (added in wrong place, own error - reverted)
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-31 11:50:55+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1373331867

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-31 11:50:53+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12715728036

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
felipeeugenio (2025-03-31 13:30:24+00:00): se repone edificio borrado, que existe en terreno.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164326643
grzegorz75jan (2025-03-31 12:03:43+00:00): Bry.
Jako separator powinna być kropka lub o czymś nie wiem. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:maxweight
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164326728
WMietek (2025-03-31 13:19:05+00:00): Mój błąd, poprawiłem.
grzegorz75jan (2025-03-31 13:23:56+00:00): Elegancko. 
Nie ruszałem tego bo nie siedzę mocniej w drogach a jakiś szczegół mógł mieć znaczenie o którym nie wiem.
bxl-forever (2025-03-31 14:01:50+00:00): Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164330641
silversurfer83 (2025-03-31 15:18:19+00:00): Moin :)

bei den Wegen auf dem Friedhof möchte ich einen kleinen Einspruch einlegen. IdR sind zumindest die "Hauptwege", gerade die zur Halle und zu den Recyclingstellen führen, eher hw=service. Access kann dann auf private oder permit, aber die Bestatter und die Friedhofsbetreiber befahren diese Wege meist.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164326810
silversurfer83 (2025-04-18 15:12:03+00:00): Und?
ma-rt-in (2025-04-23 08:00:50+00:00): Dafür sehe ich aber noch nicht ein hw=service. Das kommt mal vor, aber nicht regelhaft.
Frans S (2025-04-11 10:59:29+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not tag traces just leading to farmland as unclassified.  Track is the correct choice.
and...  solve the issues shown by the issue triangle before you upload your work
Best regards
NeisReview (2025-03-31 18:03:23+00:00): Partly revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164265188
Frans S (2025-04-11 10:47:34+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping .
A remark. Never tag a trace. wider than 2-3 mtr as a path.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-04-05 13:56:38+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapped.
E: Buildings not squared.
High building(s) incorrect mapped. See par 20 chapter About Buildings
quality goes before quantity


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164327236
NeisBot (2025-03-31 12:10:35+00:00): Hi furuhashilab4plateauimport, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 85% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=164327363
furuhashilab4plateauimport (2025-04-16 13:22:29+00:00): Thank you for your feedback!

Regarding this import project, we had announced it on the Talk-ja mailing list and Slack in 2024. However, due to the graduation of the original team member, the work had been left incomplete, and we are now continuing the remaining tasks.

As for the large number of deletions of existing data, this was due to an error on our part that unintentionally created many isolated nodes, which we have since removed.

In any case, we will continue to refer to the discussions and handle the tasks appropriately.

Thank you again for your helpful comments!
habi (2025-11-04 14:27:13+00:00): Ciao mrspock550
Ich gehe grad ein paar 'lustigen' Namen in OpenStreetMap in der Schweiz nach.
Da fiel mir https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1373353411 auf.
Das Ding heisst nicht Wasserrutsche, sondern ist eine :)
Diese werden in OpenStreetMap so erfasst: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:attraction%3Dwater_slide
Ich hab' das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174196873 angepasst.
Gruss,
habi
ilias_ (2025-04-01 12:16:49+00:00): that's a big changeset
KNaing (2025-09-03 10:34:47+00:00): Thanks for your collaboration. Please make sure to draw your buildings as accurately as possible and don't forget to square the building, select them and type 'Q'
Gregory Peony (2025-03-31 16:01:57+00:00): Again you correctly addressed highway buidling overlaps. It's likely that all the footprints here are valid; some could be a little more accurate though. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164328168
Gregory Peony (2025-04-01 04:51:15+00:00): You caused the multipolygon error, becasue you created a duplicate of a relation which was already there. I deleted the new relation you added to rectify the error. ---The health centre footprint is also not as accurate as it could be I used the building tools plugin, draw nodes and extrude tools to improve it and accounted for off nadir imagery when placing it. --- You correctly resolved a highway/building overlap. Please see Changeset: 164356401 for my resolution.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164328177
Gregory Peony (2025-03-31 16:13:02+00:00): It looks like you improved the accuracy of residential areas in this changeset. I improved the accuracy of the middle one in Changeset: 164338399 so that you can see how I mapped it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164328880
Gregory Peony (2025-04-01 05:09:24+00:00): Why did you delete the village node in this changeset? If you come accross nodes like this in the future, even if you cannot see a settlement in the most recent imagery or if they don't have a name, it's best to change the tag to place=locality instead of deleting them outright. This makes it easier to undo the change if needed, to preserve local place names, and to classify the highway network. Here the settlement is clearly visible so deleting it was incorrect regardless. See Changeset: 164356744 for my resolution --- The building footprints are all valid and fairly accurate: the main inaccuracy is their orientation use ctrl.+shift to rotate features and ctrl.+alt to scale them in JOSM. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164328907
Gregory Peony (2025-04-01 05:10:06+00:00): You correctly modified highways and a residential area to address building footprint overlaps.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164328907
MJ_ane (2025-04-01 12:29:19+00:00): Thanks Gregory for the feedback - I just learned something new since I wasn't aware of the fact that we add nodes to mark f.e. a village. So I also didn't check the tag and "just deleted it" since I was not sure whether it is just a missing node that I did. In future I will have a more careful look at that :) !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164328907
Frans S (2025-04-02 14:51:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Rather precise mapped. However, you forgot to square 27 buildings you have mapped. Square them with the Q key after mapping the building and it is still selected.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-04-02 15:07:34+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
H: Included a yard of clearing.
High building(s) incorrect mapped. See par 20 chapter About Buildings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164328983
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-04-01 23:01:09+00:00): Why were payment tags removed?
Emilius123 (2025-03-31 15:13:14+00:00): Danke!
itineris (2025-08-08 14:40:42+00:00): Ez a 40-es csökkentés csak ideiglenes volt, az elektromos kábel fektetésének idejére.
JhowieNitnek (2025-03-31 14:06:48+00:00): My bad, I coppied the trees that where already there and I shouldn't
RaphaelPasloin (2025-04-01 02:48:03+00:00): Hello,

Indeed , it's probably better to respond to the changeset comments https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164326792 rather than this one witch is correct ;-)

Nevertheless, I would like to take this opportunity to point out that the placement of the trees you have made is very good.

Have a good day,
Raphaël
Cl6S (2025-03-31 13:42:39+00:00): The changes in this Changeset I made are wrong but I do not know how I delete this.
NeisReview (2025-03-31 18:11:40+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
NeisBot (2025-03-31 13:40:35+00:00): Hi furuhashilab4plateauimport, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 85% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features!?

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=164331125
furuhashilab4plateauimport (2025-04-13 10:54:57+00:00): Hi, thank you for reaching out!

I can confirm that all deletions made in the changeset you've reviewed were intentional and carefully executed following the official MLIT PLATEAU import guidelines provided here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:MLIT_PLATEAU/imports_outline

According to these guidelines, certain existing data without primary map features may require deletion to accurately reflect updated, authoritative data from PLATEAU. I have thoroughly verified each deletion to ensure compliance and correctness.

If you have any further questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to let me know.

Thank you for your diligence and support!
DiogoBaptista98 (2025-04-14 04:39:20+00:00): Este projecto estás num estagio muito inicial sem sequer ter traçado discutido, estudado e muito menos definido pelo que o seu mapeamento não me parece de todo enquadrado no OSM.
geisthugo123 (2025-04-03 22:56:45+00:00): Hi und vielen Dank für den Edit.
Der Gehweg daneben also der Footway ist allerdings seperat gemappt, daher macht das segregated=yes hier keinen Sinn. Das würde nur Sinn machen wenn die beiden OSM-Ways einer wären.
Viele Grüße
TrickyFoxy (2025-04-01 10:32:29+00:00): В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее