piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-07 20:30:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2977569135
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1247395713

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
uprkos (2026-07-06 20:09:01+00:00): Potwierdzone. Są to osobne budynki, z tym samym adresem.
mueschel (2024-02-16 12:14:12+00:00): Hi,
what does "nomaxspeed" mean? 

There is really no speed limit? -> maxspeed=none
There is no sign?  -> maxspeed:signed = no
Frans S (2024-02-26 09:40:00+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark. Please do not connect nodes of buildings to other buildings. 
Best regards
Lejun (2024-02-13 18:39:34+00:00): Voir également https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145198532
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-07 21:01:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Chrzanowska":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177166643
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/867499688

"Stanisława Moniuszki":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362376139

"Tadeusza Kościuszki":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362376333
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/593871887
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1112769959

"Osiedle XX-lecia":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/379756626

"Bagno":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386260258

"20-tu Straconych":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386376713
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386377571
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386378461
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386378958
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791346088
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791346090
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791346342
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791347169
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1032706303
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1032706304
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1237212997
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1237212999

"marszałka Józefa Piłsudskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386411956

"Nowakowskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457644681

"Osiedle Szwedy":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462623746
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462623748
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1202221707
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1202222018

"Osiedle Skalska":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489051741

"Osiedle Władysława Łokietka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/560192735

"Marszałka Piłsudskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/596663831
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/686718424
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/772062764
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1113104968

"Łukasińskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600879723
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/681190333
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844209620
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844210421

"Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791347290

"Wrzosowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1184879929
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1184879932
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1184879934

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mcliquid (2024-02-08 07:33:43+00:00): Hallo, wenn bei einem Objekt "addr:place" bereits gesetzt ist, darf "addr:street" nicht ergänzt werden. Die beiden Werte widersprechen sich!

Hello, if "addr:place" is already set for an object, "addr:street" must not be added. The two values contradict each other!
Lejun (2024-02-13 18:39:27+00:00): Voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145198532
Tomas Straupis (2024-02-08 05:24:53+00:00): Laba diena, prašome nekeisti vandens telkinių žymėjimo. Pakeitimas atšauktas.
Alt7706 (2024-02-08 20:17:11+00:00): Sistema prašo keisti, o pagal jūsų taisykles nereikia. Iš kur žinoti visas nerašytas ir jūsų sugalvotas taisykles ?
Tomas Straupis (2024-02-09 08:38:43+00:00): Jūsų naudojamas labai prastas redaktorius iD prašo keisti. Reikia galvoti savo galva, o ne daryti bet ką, ką kompiuteris pasako.
eggie (2024-02-07 22:50:12+00:00): De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande BAG adresnode.
groet
eggie
emersonveenstra (2024-02-09 13:07:01+00:00): Reverted for vandalism in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147256405
ChrissW-R1 (2026-03-30 20:00:39+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/5226688
flohoff (2024-02-08 10:02:09+00:00): Moin,
so als tipp - building=* kann diverse werte annnehmen nicht nur yes. Also eine einzelne Garage könnte "building=garage" sein - Mehrfachgaragen "building=garages". 

Mehrfamilienhäuser "building=apartments", Einfamilienhäuser "building=detached" etc 

Keep mapping

Flo
Sonojak (2024-02-08 17:21:09+00:00): Moin,
vielen Dank für Deinen Tipp. Ich werde das künftig berücksichtigen.

Gruß Sonojak
gscholz (2024-02-08 07:53:59+00:00): 

Hi MapeoAlmeria,
your recent edits have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-1.93673&lat=37.38546&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147194769

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2024-02-10 08:51:53+00:00): Hi MapeoAlmeria,
your recent edits have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes. Please do not give up, there is still a lot to do:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-1.93673&lat=37.38546&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Kind regards
Guido
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-02-08 14:07:17+00:00): OSM不是您的试验场地

如果您希望试验编辑功能，请去OSM的沙盒 https://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/

如果您希望创作虚构的城市，可以去 OpenGeofiction 发挥创意 https://opengeofiction.net/

因为湖中并不存在具体的加油站和变电站，因此我希望您做出一个解释，如果迟迟等不到您的回复，龙年前就得给您扬喽，问题编辑不过年
matt_ellery (2024-02-07 22:14:24+00:00): A conversation at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89790560 highlighted that some localities were being used for the purpose of showing bridge names on the standard map. This CS moves the information to the bridge with an appropriate tag.
citrula (2024-02-08 03:33:55+00:00): I fixed the highway geometry in this changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147199528

It looks like you drew the same road multiple times. I deleted those as well.
gscholz (2024-02-11 06:27:23+00:00): Hi Abdulaziz Jimoh,
your recent edits have left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=3.20997&lat=6.67027&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147195485

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
whatismoss (2024-02-17 13:17:35+00:00): Les lignes Tadao Bulle sont des BHNS, merci de ne pas supprimer leur busway!!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-07 23:00:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168407227
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180121290

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-10 19:48:48+00:00): poprawione
emersonveenstra (2024-02-09 14:05:59+00:00): Hi there,

You created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1247447313 with no tags, could you please go back and tag it? Thanks!
amacmcgrann (2024-02-16 03:19:32+00:00): Fixed. TY!
Javierpf (2024-02-09 21:34:20+00:00): Hello! Thank you for contribuiting :-). It seems your changeset crosses many continents/countries. Please retain your changeset smaller. Let reviewers and other mappers check your edit more easily. It's impossible (almost) to keep track of the database and changes if changes in huge areas.
So I kindly ask you when you edit, retain your changeset in a particular smaller area -such as countries/provinces/municipality- save it first and then move to another area. Examples:
you are adding/modifying 10 objects in 2 distant cities => make 2 changesets, 1 per city.
you are adding/modifying 5 objects in 5 countries => make 5 changesets, 1 per country.
You'll find more information on the reason in this article: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
ChrissW-R1 (2024-02-09 22:57:42+00:00): Hi,
thanks for the tips. I know these procedure, but in this case it was not relay possible. I added a sub-region of a continent, so it could not be smaller.
carfog81 (2024-03-01 22:46:20+00:00): Por qué razón?
gileri (2024-02-09 19:14:18+00:00): Bonjour youbab,

J'ai pas trop d'avis sur l'usage de highway=busway ou highway=service, mais la voie est maintenant considérée comme inacessible aux bus, véhicules de secours, taxis etc. avec tes modifications.

Est-ce bien le cas ?
gileri (2024-02-12 21:33:48+00:00): J'ai fait la modif ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147385609
Glassman (2024-02-09 17:45:05+00:00): #TIP: street names are spell out in OSM. The reason is software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you expand the name? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147196685
literan (2024-02-08 18:28:15+00:00): но там давно нет больницы.

вот, территория на продажу выставлена https://gorodskaya-usadba.ru/

судя по панорамам, стройка вовсю идет
Fantomas (2024-02-08 21:32:03+00:00): Исправлено
PerpetualHiker (2024-02-08 00:31:40+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2024-01-17.
Glassman (2024-02-09 17:43:36+00:00): #TIP: Instead of using a description tag, check out the wiki for the proper tag to use. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dretirement_home for some options.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147197119
arasay756 (2024-02-08 06:09:14+00:00): Appreciated the notes, thank you!
Manuele R (2024-02-19 06:48:50+00:00): Danke, dass auch dieses Mal meine Arbeit für nichts war. 
Darf man fragen, was an den Perronkanten in Olten, Bahnhof falsch war? Strenggenommen ist aktuelle Mappierung der falsch.
d_berger (2024-02-19 17:27:47+00:00): Deine Behauptung ist falsch, es gibt zwei korrekte Wege ein platform-Element zu erfassen: entweder als Knoten (mit highway=bus_stop) oder als Weg (mit highway=platform und highway=bus_stop auf dem stop_position-Element).[1] 

Nach endlosen Diskussionen mit usern datendelphin und Nzara ist es explizit _nicht_ erwünscht, korrekt gemappte platform-Knoten durch, platform-Wege zu ersetzen. Das wird grundsätzlich den lokalen Mappern überlassen.

Was aber ganz sicher nicht geht, ist korrekte platform-Elemente einfach aus sämtlichen Relationen rauszulöschen. Entweder man macht es sauber und ersetzt die Elemente in den Relationen wieder an der richtigen Stelle, oder man lässt es bleiben.

Auffällig ist zudem, wie Neo-Mapper wiederholt mit dem Satzfragment "meine Arbeit" ihre komplette Ignoranz bezüglich der Arbeit dutzender anderer beteiligter Mapper demonstrieren, die ebenfalls viel ihrer Lebenszeit in OSM investiert haben. Es ist grundsätzlich jedem selber überlassen, wie er seine Zeit in OSM investiert, man ist aber gut beraten sich mit lokalen und regionalen Gepflogenheiten vertraut zu machen, bevor man anderen Mitarbeitenden einfach auf Füsse tritt.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport
Manuele R (2024-02-19 20:26:25+00:00): Ich zitiere aus folgendem Artikel [1]:
"Nodes are used for locations where there is no physical infrastructure" was in Olten, Bahnhof definitiv nicht der Fall ist. Entspricht auch dem was bei der Quelle steht, die du mir geschickt hast.

Ich verstehe, deinen Frust, dass durch meine Änderungen gewisse Linien kaputt gegangen sind, aber du hast mir nicht die Zeit gelassen, die Arbeit zu beenden (nicht jeder hier kann x-Stunden am Stück am PC sitzen). Nach nicht ein Mal 24h nach meiner letzten erfassten Änderung hattest du schon alles "reversed". Kurz nachfragen, ob ich noch die Linien flicken kann (oder ev. sogar selber unterstützen) wäre natürlich netter gewesen.

Ich muss ehrlich gestehen, dass ich den Nutzen des Erfassen der Buslinien noch nicht erkannt habe (auch wenn es mir auch Spass bereitet)...ein sinnvoller Abnehmer habe ich noch nicht gefunden.
Ich mach hingegen meine Änderungen, damit z.B. die Karten auf sbb.ch korrekt sind und viele Leute von unserer Arbeit profitieren können.
Trotzdem finde ich es auch wichtig, dass die Buslinien korrekt abgebildet sind, was sie auch weiterhin waren...es fehlte "nur" die Platform, die stop_position war weiterhin vorhanden.
 
Vielleicht findest du irgendwann es auch sinnvoll die vorhandenen Platforms korrekt zu mappen. Falls nicht werde ich dieses Unterfangen irgendwann nochmals starten, einfach werde ich die Buslinien sofort fixieren...

Auf deinen letzten Abschnitt gehe ich gar nicht ein…

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Apublic_transport%3Dplatform
Supaplex (2024-05-29 04:03:53+00:00): Revert due to it being a fake bus station

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151969801
Frank Bielig (2024-02-20 08:39:25+00:00): As I see you have changed the boundary type from "land_area" to "administrative". This is in my opinion wrong. The real administrative boundary is covered by https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3406826. Probably the boundary tag can be removed completely.
Dartmouthmapmaker (2024-03-08 19:03:02+00:00): This under https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary=administrative?uselang=en
trial (2024-04-11 20:09:26+00:00): See https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/quels-tags-pour-les-collectivites-doutre-mer/22756
matheusgomesms (2024-02-09 17:21:03+00:00): Hello!

Why this restriction was removed? As far as I know, all adjacent street crossing Av Dom Luís cannot do it (driver HAS to turn into Av Dom Luís), unless there is a traffic light.

Is there any data Apple has that supports this removal? You can check street level imagery, it is forbidden to cross it (although some drivers do it anyway, but not OSM fault).
matheusgomesms (2024-02-09 17:23:44+00:00): I just reverted it, but please feel free to revert my reversion (heh!), if I'm mistaken here.
CarcrossDesert (2024-02-13 03:53:57+00:00): Hello  matheusgomesms, a traffic sign permitting left turn’s and straight on maneuvers is visible in Mapillary from October 29, 2023 (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-3.7345160247672&lng=-38.493443944702&z=19.786244976672176&focus=photo&pKey=3416996605297842&x=0.47336976645605&y=0.41807077870018855&zoom=0) showing the addition of stop lights both for it and the intersecting road Avenida Dom Luís (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437313892). As this image shows new traffic lights and the sign allowing routing straight across, I think that the restriction should be removed since it is now safe for traffic to pass through the intersection along Rua Coronel Linhares (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/910964418). If you agree after review, could you update the data here? Thank you and have a nice day.
matheusgomesms (2024-02-13 14:42:55+00:00): Ahh, I see, there is a new traffic light, you're right (in fact it was me who collect that imagery hehe!). Thanks for the heads up, I've removed the restriction and added the traffic light to make it explicit that now left turn is permitted.

Have a great day too!
Saikat Maiti (2024-02-08 11:28:41+00:00): Hi jotoga, Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap (India).

You have added a few buildings which are overlapping with each other. Please try your best to avoid any overlapping building polygon.
Please remember to square the building for squared buildings (the shortcut is "Q", if the buildings a adjoint, select all the adjoint buildings to square it) to keep a good shape and draw the building individually at your best.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1YJV6I_rhY

Happy Mapping!
vng_me (2024-02-08 02:39:50+00:00): Reverts breaking routing changes.
See the discussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133837637 for more details.
Hanse01 (2024-02-08 03:01:32+00:00): I used data from https://clark.wa.gov/elections/ballot-deposit-locations to complete these changes. Primarily looking for input on: Am I using the right tags / metadata? Or is there something else that makes sense to do as far as mapping ballot drop boxes?

For example, I noticed one of them had the drive_through key, would it make sense to amend the rest to indicate if they're drive-through drop boxes? And if so, is there a key I can use to tag the ones that are explicitly walk-up only? Or should I just do that by leaving out the drive_through key entirely?
Xvtn (2024-02-08 15:29:21+00:00): Interesting questions. I'm not too experienced in tagging in this situation, but here are a couple thoughts from me:
- If you have accurate info, I'd suggest using drive_through={no, yes, only}. Looks like all three are used regularly: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/drive_through#values
- I would consider leaving out the name= on most of these. (Test: "Is this ballot box itself named Amboy Middle School?")
- I'd say amenity=polling_station, polling_station=ballot_box is the best way to represent these, so good job on that!
Just my thoughts. Thanks for your contributions!
Hanse01 (2024-02-08 21:59:54+00:00): Appreciate the input! I'll go through and add the drive_through tag as appropriate.

As far as the names, I take your point. The school is *where* the box is located, but at the same time looking at the county's official GIS tool, this is how they're labelled: https://gis.clark.wa.gov/portal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=c6586cffe8344270bf82f5fa0185659d so it feels like the closest thing to a stable unique identifier there is.
Xvtn (2024-02-08 22:32:42+00:00): Hmm, that's a thinker. I'm sure if you asked more mappers you'd get some that agree and some that disagree. I think my opinion is still that the name tag still should not be there. But it could go either way. Worst case scenario, someone types in one of these locations, accidentally selects the ballot box, and navigates to that instead. Which really wouldn't be bad much at all since they'd be right there anyway. For that reason, I think this is a pretty low-stakes question either way, so as the (I assume) local mapper you have the final say! Thanks again!

(Also, if anyone else is reading this, please do let us know your thoughts.)
Hanse01 (2024-02-08 22:54:56+00:00): I see what you're saying. Would it make sense to insert these values into a ref_name tag instead then? I think it's valuable metadata to have, but I agree I wouldn't want it to show up in a context like navigation, where the person might search for a location, and find the ballot box instead.
Xvtn (2024-02-08 23:05:56+00:00): Wow, I've somehow made it this far without knowing about ref_name! That seems like the perfect key for those.
Xvtn (2024-02-08 23:07:53+00:00): That being said, I'm guessing Carto (the map at OpenStreetMap.org) may not render that tag. So if you still want to keep them on name then go for it. Like I said, the navigation scenario is a fairly minor downside.
pdxrider (2024-03-06 23:47:03+00:00): Hi, this changeset just popped up on my radar. After reading through the discussion above, I feel the "branch" tag would be a better fit than "ref_name" for what you're trying to convey with the name of these ballot boxes. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:branch) It's also in much wider use. What do you think?
Fizzie-DWG (2024-02-09 04:27:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15686 をご覧ください。
_________________
Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15686
ForestFurnace (2024-02-08 04:52:43+00:00): It looks like your addition of the parking lot disrupted the geometry of the Silver Bell ice cream shop. Please fix this and square the right angle corners of the buildings that you have drawn using the Square tool (with a building selected: right click > Square). Thank you and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147199158
fortera_au (2024-02-08 05:12:40+00:00): Hi Jack, is there anything on that site indicating that the content is public domain? If not, it's copywrited and we'd need to use another source or map on the ground to add this in.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147199186
Jack Boschert (2024-02-08 05:55:43+00:00): Hi Fortera, apologies, my link to the project page was an oversight. I submitted the changeset following a discussion with a Road Asset Manager at the local council and discussion with a Project Officer involved with the road upgrade works. Both were able to confirm the upgraded Quarry Road, intersection configurations and turn restrictions are now in place. Given this, I'd be very happy for the current changeset source to be removed and replaced with 'Local knowledge' and / or 'image' if this is possible retrospectively? Thank you
fortera_au (2024-02-08 07:26:29+00:00): It's not possible afterwards, but having it in here is the closest you'd get, thanks for clarifying.
kucai (2024-02-12 12:48:49+00:00): Assalamualaikum. selamat datang ke osm. 
i) building level = 1 tak perlu kerana ni adalah nilai default (bahasa baku = nilai lalai).
2) house ni kita guna utk rumah sebijik2 mcm bungalow atau kat kampung tu. guna building=terrace (yg ni digunapakai meluas) utk rumah teres. 
iii) rumah teres kalau ada jalan potong kat tengah2 tu kena diasingkan mengikut blok, jgn jadikan sebagai satu blok. 

jumpa lagi!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147199355
❤️‍🔥 (2024-02-08 09:42:10+00:00): hey, nice work with all these edits. I've spot-checked a few and everything looks perfect. 

I just thought I'd share the database query that I use to find all points that are tagged as "fixme=continue" - you might find it useful too: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1H49
dypa (2024-02-08 09:02:22+00:00): скажите, почему вы удалили адресную информацию и сделали здания частями здания?
anastasia_ (2024-02-08 10:00:36+00:00): Здравствуйте. Потому что, согласно ПКК и панорамам, эти две части здания - одно здание с одним адресом, имеющее в том числе единую подземную парковку. Поэтому были объединены в единый мультиполигон.
dypa (2024-02-12 06:37:35+00:00): Спасибо за ответ. действительно это одно здание. Но адрес указан не верно, адрес "дом 7", а не "дом 7 строение 1".
anastasia_ (2024-02-12 13:10:10+00:00): Спасибо, поправила.
dypa (2024-02-12 13:55:50+00:00): Большое спасибо за ваш труд!
anastasia_ (2024-02-13 11:42:05+00:00): Спасибо Вам!
nevw (2024-02-08 06:21:49+00:00): Correction…changeset comment should read ‘very coarse’
BubbaJuice (2024-05-30 01:06:40+00:00): No, it isn't. I recommend you check resources before deleting buildings that you have only have the story about. https://www.shopfoothillsmall.com/
TrickyFoxy (2024-02-08 08:13:23+00:00): На будущее, использовать Google для правок в OSM нельзя
user_20979216 (2024-02-08 20:15:25+00:00): Hallo Johann! Ist das Account Nummer 151?
mavl (2024-02-23 18:51:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147818131, 147828921 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
marczoutendijk (2024-03-27 10:41:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1213010164
Hi,
The values for the surface tag should indicate what that surface is made of, not what its function is.
Please see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface
fortera_au (2024-03-27 12:12:02+00:00): Thanks for catching that, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149222216
nevw (2024-02-09 03:30:57+00:00): koof67 appears to have deleted all the wooded areas again in changeset 147205318
nevw (2024-02-09 03:34:48+00:00): ...as dissplayed in achavi 
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=147205318
Ewen Hill (2024-02-10 02:04:22+00:00): Thanks Nevw for the news. I will be reverting this and sending a note to the DWG.
mueschel (2024-02-17 13:17:44+00:00): Hi,
you added the strange tag "gsv" here. Did you mean "psv"?
mat (2024-02-17 13:29:08+00:00): Ah, yes, I did, fixing.