piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jan Wilts (2025-05-01 19:15:21+00:00): Oeps, deze gemist; ik was hem al aan het verwijderen als je dat niet erg vindt?
maro21 (2025-05-02 19:07:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006468144 Ta ulica oficjalnie nie ma nazwy. Czy na północ od skrzyżowania z Kminkową stoi tabliczką z taką nazwą?
Mirosław Żylewicz (2025-05-02 19:24:54+00:00): Nie pamiętam czy jest znak z nazwą ulicy ale wiem, że budynek numer 35 i 36 położony na końcu tej ulicy ma adres ulicy Tymiankowej. Adresy budynków zawsze leżą przy danej ulicy.

Ponadto na planach nowej inwestycji Osiedla Waniliowa została naniesiona wspomniana ulica i nosi nazwę Tymiankowej.
Mirosław Żylewicz (2025-05-03 08:56:16+00:00): Oto znak informujący o nazwie ulicy:

https://i.ibb.co/gF98kGRg/Znak-kierunkowy-ulica-Tymiankowa.jpg
maro21 (2025-05-04 20:24:54+00:00): Nie zawsze. To nie ma znaczenia, adres to nie to samo co nazwa ulicy. Adresy biorą się od nazwy ulicy, a nie nazwa ulicy od adresów.
Dzięki za zdjęcie. Według zdjęcia to ulica na południe od Kminkowej ma tabliczkę, a na północ nie ma nazwy.
Mirosław Żylewicz (2025-05-06 15:05:08+00:00): Spójrz na poniższe przykłady. Kierunek i umiejscowienie znaku ma znaczenie (liczy się również położenie względem linii słupka).

https://polska-org.pl/foto/195/Wyznaczanie_17_poludnika_Wroclaw_195627.jpg

https://tabliczki24.pl/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/tablica-z-nazwa-ulicy-duza-niebieskoczerwona.png

https://blog.polityka.pl/naukowy/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/alejkap.jpg
infeeeee (2025-05-21 17:22:15+00:00): Szia!

A német közösség kérése az volt, hogy csak azok a nevek legyenek feltüntetve mint német név, amik jelenleg is ki vannak táblázva. Ezeket a történelmi neveket az old_name:de címkébe kell megadni, ahol már amúgy szerepeltek. 

További infó: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#German_names_of_municipalities

Módosításcsomag visszavonva.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166579323
infeeeee (2025-05-21 17:22:16+00:00): Szia!

A német közösség kérése az volt, hogy csak azok a nevek legyenek feltüntetve mint német név, amik jelenleg is ki vannak táblázva. Ezeket a történelmi neveket az old_name:de címkébe kell megadni, ahol már amúgy szerepeltek. 

További infó: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#German_names_of_municipalities

Módosításcsomag visszavonva.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166579323
OregTiercap (2025-05-24 20:41:15+00:00): Értem, elnézést, hogy ennek nem néztem utána. Igazából én csak amikor németre állítom egy térképnek a nyelvét, akkor azt szeretném, hogy minden településnek, aminek akármilyen nem használt német neve is van, az jelenjen meg, s ne a német nyelvtől idegen betűket stb. lássak elsőként. Attól még mindig jó azt gondolom, ha egy térkép a helyi nevet is kimutatja, így ezért az eligazodásban sem lenne gond talán így. De ezzel az "old_name" címkével már csak technikai kivitelezés kérdése a térképalkalmazást készítők számára, így ez amúgy is jó kompromisszumnak néz ki.
Köszönöm a türelmes és informatív felülvizsgálatot.
BCNorwich (2025-06-15 05:38:32+00:00): Hi, I see you added layer= tags to houses on West Hill Road. Do you realise that layer=-10 or any minus layer is underground?   Thus I've removed the layer=-? tags.
TheNightRider (2025-05-14 15:14:31+00:00): The US National Park Service has a photo at https://www.nps.gov/places/000/yoda-fountain.htm , so if the US government has a photo, it should be usable with no issue. I could be wrong, though!
spughetti (2025-10-16 14:58:54+00:00): Nevertheless the category still exists, and a new image has been added since. As long as the Commons category exists, it should be tagged on OSM. I've added it back: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173370781
TheNightRider (2025-10-24 08:38:57+00:00): That category is probably going to go away, no matter how many times people try to add an image to it, because we're fighting the US copyright laws and their enforcers.
spughetti (2025-10-24 09:58:59+00:00): The banner at the top of the Commons category informs people that there's copyright issues, deleting it would make this issue less clear to Commons contributors, so I doubt it will be deleted. But if it is it should be removed from this OSM feature as well.
kmpoppe_repair (2025-05-02 17:54:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165730866 where the changeset comment is: Reverting personal information
infeeeee (2025-05-03 00:26:38+00:00): Szia!

A kivéve engedéllyel súlykorlátozást azt azzal lehet jelölni, hogy maxweight:conditional=none @ permit

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/?key=maxweight%3Aconditional&value=none+%40+permit

További jó térképezést!
mtc (2025-05-19 01:57:53+00:00): On further investigation, I found a Union Church on HWY 72 called Union Fort Creek Church, which might just be named after the creek just north of this location. I am going to reference the GNIS information on that node.
Mathias_ADAV (2025-06-04 12:20:58+00:00): Bonjour,

je viens de voir vos contributions concernant les aménagements cyclables de Roubaix, je vais supprimé une grande partie car ce ne sont pas des pistes cycalbles. Je vous conseille fortement de vous référer au wiki openstreetmap pour cartographier précisement les éelemtns que vous voyez sur le terrain wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle
Mathias_ADAV (2025-06-04 12:21:53+00:00): Vous pouvez commencer par cartographier avec application streetcomplete; c'est plus simple et vos contributions seront correcte : https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.westnordost.streetcomplete&hl=fr
mikedld (2025-05-21 13:45:36+00:00): Olá Rui! Percebo bem que isto vem de um survey? O website para https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12444352488 diz que é Worten Mobile, qual é o correto? Temos de os informar sobre isso?
rui228 (2025-05-21 20:13:14+00:00): olá mikedld
voltei a repor a etiqueta loja de telemóveis.
Geogast (2025-05-01 20:25:46+00:00): comentario del changeset: o AeroGRU já não está em fase de construção, empora falte ainda para a inauguração oficial
JeroMack (2025-05-02 23:10:34+00:00): thanks, i mustve moved some nodes and i didnt notice it
Yog Sot (2025-05-02 23:23:12+00:00): before you edit something, just make sure you're especially not changing boundaries. 
join the community on discord and ask your questions there
Akkurator (2025-05-20 21:08:40+00:00): Ist diese Straße immer noch auch für Radfahrer gesperrt? Wird ja seit Jahren diskutiert, sie instandzusetzen.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-01 21:00:53+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2703534415
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1382857344

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
JeroMack (2025-05-02 23:56:23+00:00): adres został poprawiony
skquinn (2025-05-29 21:02:12+00:00): Hi,

The CVS store is both a chemist (drugstore) and a pharmacy. The pharmacy is intentionally mapped as a separate node to allow for different opening_hours as it is not open 24 hours like the drugstore portion.
pavvv (2025-05-02 08:35:30+00:00): prośba: nie łącz dróg z area:highway. to tylko utrudnia późniejsze edycje geometrii i dróg i a:h.
marc__marc (2026-02-12 08:07:11+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130914046/history/3
heating=central renseigne-t-il un chauffage central par radiateur heating=radiator ? la source du bâtiment peux se renseigner avec heating:input=* si connue pour faire la différence avec les radiateurs électriques
Cordialement,
Marc
MassCartog (2025-05-01 22:43:19+00:00): Hi Welcome to OSM. I noticed in this change set you removed a few valid features. On OSM we don't remove real features if they exist on the ground. 

Removing this data in OSM will have no effect on the car navigation apps most people use, Google, Apple, Waze, here, mapquest etc. This problem cannot be solved my removing data from OSM. 

The correct way to handle this in OSM is to use the tagging system. access=no seems to apply here. Once this is done services that do use OSM data will reflect that and will no longer route anyone on that road.

I restored the way and tagged it appropriately. 

Please read this for more information:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property
MassCartog (2025-05-21 15:42:30+00:00): [no user response]
lololailo (2025-05-02 06:35:22+00:00): Hola, quizás me equivoqué al usar las etiquetas de fechas de inicio del uso de los pozos, use "date" en lugar de "start_date" ya que los pozos empezaron a usarse, según que pozo, entre los siglos XVI y XVIII, y dejaron de utilizarse a principios del siglo XX.
Para una informacion más completa puedes consultar el plan director https://patrimoniocultural.carm.es/documents/1806272/15477882/Plan+Director+Pozos+de+la+Nieve+Sierra+Espu%C3%B1a.+MEMORIA/88f974ec-8aaa-4f6e-bcef-b39893fdbd4f?version=1.0
Un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165696457
arte2002 (2025-05-02 20:31:42+00:00): Creo que start_date es más adecuada
5m4u9 (2025-05-02 03:37:14+00:00): Hola, bienvenid@!

En este mapa, los nombres deben ser nombres propios, un nombre de un edificio o granja o un negocio, no está bien colocar una descripción. 

Por otro lado, si el terreno será una construcción podemos cambiar a terreno en construcción....
felipeeugenio (2025-05-02 04:19:45+00:00): Estimado. 
Eso es un proyecto serio. 
Le pedimos por favor no vandalizar el trabajo de toda una comunidad. 
Todas y cada una de sus ediciones han estado siendo revertidas.
Si quiere dar explicaciones las puede dar en el chat de la comunidad en el link que puede encontrar en mi perfil. 
Saludos y gracias por su comprensión.
felipeeugenio (2025-05-02 04:19:56+00:00): Estimado. 
Eso es un proyecto serio. 
Le pedimos por favor no vandalizar el trabajo de toda una comunidad. 
Todas y cada una de sus ediciones han estado siendo revertidas.
Si quiere dar explicaciones las puede dar en el chat de la comunidad en el link que puede encontrar en mi perfil. 
Saludos y gracias por su comprensión.
jptolosa (2025-05-02 05:28:45+00:00): Hola, en todas estas ediciones se han agregado una gran cantidad de calles inexistentes. Cuál es su intención?
b-jazz (2025-05-02 05:23:57+00:00): Hello there tdaco.

Thanks for your contributions. Please make sure your fairways don't intersect with other golf elements (like other fairways, greens, sandtraps, water hazards, tees, etc.). Hole 1 and 2 fairways for example are overlapping. If you have to put them together, you should share the nodes of all border nodes by hovering near another node and iD will "snap" to the hovered node and share it.
Thx.
tdaco091 (2025-05-02 13:20:36+00:00): Thank you for the feedback b-jazz. Slightly unrelated question, but do you know why the layer colors for the golf elements (fairway, tee, etc) only show up once fully zoomed in on the map? When zoomed out it just shows the general golf area as the light green color. Looking at the two other golf courses mapped in Timmins (Spruce Needles and Hollinger), they don't seem to follow the same behavior.
b-jazz (2025-05-02 14:07:30+00:00): Not sure why the designers of iD decided to display it in that way. I don't use iD much. I prefer JOSM for all of my editing. You can even customize all visual aspects of it. I could make greens be a dashed red line and fairways be a 2 pixel wide yellow line if I wanted.
Greg91 (2025-07-04 22:14:51+00:00): Hi!
In this changeset I spotted you added garbage dumpsters.
The convention of OSM regarding amenities (unlike trees) is not to map every object, but to map one place that serves as certain amenity as one.
E.g. on Parpetzi near Tumanyan, there should be only one point of mixed garbage collection.
However, currently there are 3 separate points of separate waste collection... because of pitfalls of import. (They should be merged eventually form 3-2 points of red/blue/yellow/glass containers into 1)
lessiopi (2025-05-06 00:04:22+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding these addresses. I noticed the address with the house number of 7779 has the street name of Lucy Brown Lane, but it's location is along Airline Highway. Could you check this please?
b-jazz (2025-05-03 03:52:21+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/902258145

Hello Vurmilion. The lines that define fairways, greens, bunkers, water hazards, and tees should never intersect or partially overlap each other and we noticed that they are overlapping in one or more of the feature pairs in this changeset. If there is no obvious fringe around the green, the fairway should butt up against the green and every node between them should be *shared*. If there is a fringe around the green that is similar to the fairway, the fairway should extend around the green and the two objects should be merged together into a multipolygon (See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon for how to create them with your map editor).  Please read the wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions, please reply here and I'll gladly help clarify things. Thanks!
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:53:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:54:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:00:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:01:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:59:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:00:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:58:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:57:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:56:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
Erelen (2025-05-02 02:01:34+00:00): You use ESRI with zero offset and move existing objects to wrond place.
PerpetualHiker (2025-05-05 18:59:28+00:00): Hi Erelen, 

Thanks for bringing this up. Is the offset you reccomend close to Esri World Imagery (3.36;-3.66)? Or is there a specific offset that you suggest? The reason I ask is because I do not see an offset cited.

Thank you for your help. Have a good day!
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:58:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:55:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:01:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:02:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
b-jazz (2025-05-03 04:07:39+00:00): RE: the fairway/green on hole 10 (and possibly others)...

As I pointed out in a previous comment on one of your changesets (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162408944), you shouldn't be intersecting the ways that define the borders of greens and fairways (and most other golf course elements as well). Please read up on the wiki mentioned in those comments and start mapping golf course elements properly. Thanks.
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:01:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:01:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:01:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:00:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:00:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:02:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
Minh Nguyen (2025-05-02 01:24:07+00:00): This was also based on a field survey in 2022.
cuzi (2025-05-04 20:46:56+00:00): FYI an anonymous person has opened a note about this changeset, I don't know what exactly they mean by it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4737947
KB-01 (2025-05-06 12:15:38+00:00): I removed some crossings in this area where there are no lowered curbs or pavement markings indicating that they are places where pedestrians should cross the street
cuzi (2025-05-07 12:36:59+00:00): I'll close that note then.
nleanba (2025-05-04 14:43:12+00:00): Is this really a information board with the title "delta airlines phone number customer service", and does the _board itself_ hava phone number?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165699017
hertipau (2025-10-22 14:06:44+00:00): Hi, du hattest die PLZ des Hauses Ewald-Görshop-Straße 153 von 58454 auf 44149 geändert. osm.zz.de zeigt mir das als Fehler an. Das Haus liegt zwar auf Dortmunder Stadtgebiet, der PLZ-Bereich von Witten 58454 schließt dieses Haus jedoch noch mit ein. Was ist denn nun wohl richtig? Vielleicht hast du ja Ortskenntnis.
Grüße, Herb
Bienson (2025-11-05 11:43:29+00:00): Hallo,

Ich habe mich lediglich an ALKIS gehalten, dort ist es als 44149 Dortmund eingetragen:

https://www.tim-online.nrw.de/tim-online2/
iandees (2025-05-02 22:11:05+00:00): Reverted spam edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165738934
iandees (2025-05-02 22:11:06+00:00): Reverted spam edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165738934
iandees (2025-05-02 22:11:07+00:00): Reverted spam edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165738934
iandees (2025-05-02 22:11:08+00:00): Reverted spam edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165738934
iandees (2025-05-02 22:11:09+00:00): Reverted spam edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165738934
eggie (2025-05-02 06:14:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Beter niet iets veranderen aan de gebouwomtrek. Alles is precies ingemeten geïmporteerd vanuit het Kadaster.
De naam van het gebouw is dat werkelijk Epic Den Bosch?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-05-02 06:19:40+00:00): Reverted by changeset #165703046
due changing BAG import bbuilding_shape.
Voorlopig heb ik je edits teruggedraaid.
Hier zit Avans Hogeschool. Wanneer Epic hier ook een kantoor heeft kan het als bedrijf worden toegevoegd met een office=...  op een adresnode. 
MVG
eggie
muralito (2025-05-02 13:41:13+00:00): Hi. Could you please check this changeset against Maxar uptodate imagety that #adt has access to?
SaltonSea (2025-05-05 17:26:33+00:00): Hello muralito, I can confirm, based on the most recent Maxar imagery published on 2024-11-10, that the extended segment of Avenida General Rivera (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403715086) has existed for some time. Hopefully that answers your question.
joel56dt (2025-05-04 22:05:00+00:00): I have added your business here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12810599916
flohoff (2025-05-02 06:52:02+00:00): Moin,
wie ist denn hier der exakte Wortlaut des Schildes?

access=private wäre ja "Betreten verboten".

"Durchfahrt verboten" wäre vehicle=destination nicht access=private.

access=private verhindert auch das die Post, der Zeitungsbote oder der Pizzalieferdienst da rein fährt, das ist aber häufig nicht das was gewollt ist und die Schilder sind Präziser. Deshalb den genauen Wortlaut erfassen und am besten als "note:access=" mit auf die betroffenen Wege.

Flo
bartgron (2025-05-03 14:39:50+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165762541
thewintch (2025-05-02 09:27:09+00:00): Yes, but in terms of direction, it's one way for cycling and walking as well, opposite to each other. That's why I'm thinking it should be drown separately.
yelisey90 (2025-05-02 20:27:11+00:00): Why opposite? The arrows point in the same direction: https://imgur.com/lSkukbQ
But really, one-way direction for footways is completely unpractical to map, even when there is some signage that prescribes it. People tend to ignore it completely, and would expect routing software to direct them in the shortest direction, not in the opposite way. Of course, for narrow passages and/or difficult waymarked trails one way tags are indeed useful; but in our case in practice it's oneway=no.
ralley (2025-05-02 20:18:52+00:00): Hi the changeset mapped cycle-way lanes as separate ways, this should only be done where there is a physical barrier between the lanes
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-10 10:38:49+00:00): Reverted addition of SEO POI "Wonder Cooling" with blatantly promotional description, possibly Google Maps sourced and incorrect tagging

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183916646
yrtimiD (2025-05-02 15:25:05+00:00): Hello and thank you for contribution!

You added here a separate node for the park while whole park is already exists as a shape https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1197962918

This created unneeded duplicates. Please be sure to always check the area to ensure your new feature is not yet on the map.
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-05 09:53:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM :)

What yrtimiD described is known as the "one feature, one OSM element" guideline. Please have a look at the basic guidelines here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#The_basics
grzegorz75jan (2025-05-03 16:45:35+00:00): Zmiana do kosza.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165768370
dadavid (2025-05-05 10:35:08+00:00): Hi Kormoran-map, 

der Bergfried hier [1] sah vorher eigentlich ganz gut gemappt aus, oder? :) Du hast eine ganze Menge tags entfernt, wieso? 

Und zweite Frage noch, was für eine Art Attraktion ist denn der Märchenwald hier [2], also was gibt es da vor Ort zu sehen? :) Im Internet finde ich da recht wenig zu. 

Viele Grüße und Weiterhin viel Spass beim Mappen :) 

David

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169707729

[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1382915416
Kormoran-map (2025-05-06 06:05:35+00:00): Hi David,

Danke für dein Feedback.

Ich war an diesem Tag hier unterwegs und habe auf der Burg den Eindruck, dass der Bergfried ein wenig "verschoben" sein sollte.
Gelöscht habe ich weiter nördlich bei Grubfeld einen Weg, den es nicht mehr gibt.

Solltest du für den Bergfried bessere Daten haben würde ich dich bitten meine Änderung zu korrigieren.

Danke im Vorfeld. 
 
Der Märchenwald ist frei zugänglich und erstreckt sich auf das eingetragene Gebiet.
Anbei ein Link.

https://www.sehenswerter-bayerischer-wald.de/laumertal-maerchenwald-brennberg-kinderausflug-regensburg

Gruß
Kormoran