piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Joseph R P (2025-06-28 23:49:59+00:00): Back then I used to tag these short controlled-access spurs of highways that branch of other freeways as motorways, since that's what I had been used to seeing them tagged as, and under the basis it's connected to another freeway at its end, but since then I've actually been undoing those edits of mine as well as others I've come across. I've just now tagged this one as secondary with expressway=yes.
Filip009 (2023-12-25 08:55:44+00:00): Telefónne čísla boli dobre. Boli v medzinárodnom formáte, tak ako majú byť. Prečo ste ich zmenil?
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-12-30 12:01:58+00:00): Hi, you should use 
highway=footway
footway=sidewalk 

for pedestrian only sidewalk or

highway=path
bicycle=designated
foot=designated
footway=sidewalk
surface=***

for a combined bicycle-pedestrian one
Kayo_33 (2024-01-01 20:30:29+00:00): For the sake of brevity perhaps `highway=path` is sufficient? This way cycle routers can utilise it as well.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-01-01 21:05:30+00:00): If you want to make a bicycle-pedestrian path, then I'd recommend adding all the tags I've mentioned in the second list. highway=path without other tags is often interpreted as an unpaved forest path. By adding designated access and surface, routers would know that this is convenient and obstacle-free path both for pedestrians and cyclists.

If there are some places where it's not really designated for bicycles, but a person may often choose it due to being more safe than carriageway, then use highway=footway and add bicycle=yes in these places.
tyfi (2023-12-23 21:18:47+00:00): I also bumped it to tertiary.
Langlaeufer (2023-12-24 12:19:19+00:00): Das oneway auf dem Verbindungsstück erschien mir falsch, weil sonst kann an der Kreuzung nicht mehr links abgebogen werden
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145451012
ibanez (2023-12-24 16:41:58+00:00): Völlig richtig. Da ist mir ein Fehler unterlaufen. Vielen Dank für das Anpassen und Kommentierung. Ich habe die Anzahl der Fahrstreifen (lanes=*) auch noch korregiert.
Filip009 (2023-12-25 08:52:50+00:00): Ahoj, vďaka za prispievanie do OpenStreetMap.
Brána sa značí ako jeden bod na mieste, kde sa nachádza. Takto si ju dal na celú cestu. Prosím prerob bránu na jeden bod na mieste, kde sa nachádza na danej ceste.
A do mena, patrí meno, nie popis objektu.
Pokiaľ máš nejaké otázky, neváhaj sa spýtať v slovenskej OSM skupine https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk.
citrula (2023-12-23 21:58:47+00:00): Hi, this edit is not correct - addr:street should only contain the name of the street and nothing else. The name (Casa Rosa apartments) does not go in this field.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145451194
OddlyAngled (2023-12-24 14:40:28+00:00): Woods Creek should probably be Woods Creek Trail?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145451497
OddlyAngled (2023-12-24 16:10:29+00:00): also the operator should be the National Park Service not Parks 😀 I fixed a couple of these
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145451497
omnibeet (2023-12-24 23:20:33+00:00): Those should be fixed now. Thanks for the heads up!
felipeeugenio (2023-12-25 10:16:19+00:00): Hola, por favor no agregar nombres descriptivos y menos usando los nombres de los dueños. esto no es un proyecto para corroborar dominio de terrenos.
Además, el concepto de farmland está usando incorrectamente acá.
Necesitamos saber como se llama el fundo, o campo. Eso si lo podemos usar.
Cualquier duda puede unirse al chat de maperos de Chile, donde más de 200 maperos están disponibles para resolver sus dudas.
gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145451957
felipeeugenio (2023-12-25 10:07:07+00:00): Hola. por favor no agregar información privada al mapa (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information).
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145452015
felipeeugenio (2023-12-25 10:13:02+00:00): Hola. Es privado desde qué punto?
Hay como una población a la cual se accede desde un camino privado?
saludos
jj000 (2023-12-23 22:21:54+00:00): Hier mijn wijziging: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145452128
Cristoffs (2024-01-24 15:43:23+00:00): Cześć! Tak nie oznacza się dróg, które jeszcze nie istnieją.  Już poprawiłem. Pamiętaj proszę, że dane OSM są wykorzystywane przez wiele aplikacji i takie oznaczenie jest niebezpieczne dla kierowców.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-23 22:30:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095545379

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
blef (2023-12-24 11:15:10+00:00): Hi Niels,
What is this tag "caravan_site:type" you add on caravan sites, with values as "parking_lot", "village", "lake" etc.?
I couldn't find any description on the Wiki. Has it been discussed somewhere?
eggie (2023-12-28 16:38:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Lijkt me oke..  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:island

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Nielkrokodil (2025-02-01 18:55:42+00:00): Gilt die Einbahn hier und am Nachbarweg auch für Fußgänger?
mcliquid (2025-02-01 19:03:59+00:00): Ich hab hier auch foot=no gesetzt. Hier ist aber die Praxis dass man sein Bike neben dem Trail wieder hochfährt / schiebt.
Wer hier biken geht, weiß das bzw. macht es einfach. Theoretisch könnte man auch einen weiteren path irgendwo zwischen den beiden Trails in die Mitte legen als "Aufstieg". Aber ich würde sagen, dass ist dann Tagging for the Router.
Nielkrokodil (2025-02-01 19:33:29+00:00): Passt :) Danke!
fititnt (2023-12-24 01:29:28+00:00): É triste, mas de 2023-09-26 à 2023-12-23 (três meses) O Bairro Navegantes (Encantado) deixou de existir.

Eu sei que para OSM isso pode ser reduzido para uma "relation fix", mas ele representa um bairro.
Nielkrokodil (2025-02-01 18:26:19+00:00): Hallo,
du hast die Forumsdiskussion eh mitbekommen. Weißt du, ob du auf dem highway=path oneway:foot oder foot=no ergänzen kannst?
mcliquid (2025-02-01 18:30:34+00:00): Hi, ja sehr gerne: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162021495
Das ist einer von vielen Biketrails oder wie man das nennen mag. Mittelberg und Brandnertal haben auch ganz viele davon.
Ich hatte am Anfang einfach nur "highway=cycleway" dafür verwendet, aber man ist wohl der Meinung, dass ein cycleway immer befestigt ist und sich für die Sonntagsrunde eignet ;)
Leo Slager (2024-01-05 22:29:00+00:00): Dag Raymond,
Even opletten:
voor de bushalte geldt de volgende tagging:
highway=bus_stp
en
public_transport=platform.
bus=yes

Daarnaast kun je de plaats op de highway waar de bus stopt taggen met
public_tansport=stop_position 
Die node moet dus altijd worden vastgemaakt aan de highway.

ik pas het even aan.
Leo Slager (2024-01-05 22:34:46+00:00): Top, dat nu alle bushaltes daar op de kaart staan. Goed bezig !
emersonveenstra (2023-12-24 01:23:14+00:00): Hi there,

Thanks for the addition! In order for GPS to correlate your house with the road, the address needs to be the same, so you would need to change "E Schafer
 to "East Schafer Road"

Also the routing issues might be because your driveway is marked as "access=private", so some GPSes are ignoring it as a possible route. Removing that tag could also help
Manuel H (2024-08-04 11:00:26+00:00): Gibt es auch eine Quelle für den Namen der Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16865369?
Beschreibungen sind keine Namen.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-23 23:50:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1074931766
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095545379

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
JhowieNitnek (2023-12-26 22:58:08+00:00): Hi why did you remove the Wikidata and the Commons links? They still refer to the building.
bxl-forever (2023-12-27 12:04:54+00:00): Do they?  They are named after the former place that no longer exists.

Perhaps it would be more appropriate to rename the Wikidata and Commons entries, then we can link to them again.  Or, if what is required is to show a picture of the building (regardless of the café currently operating it), perhaps just the image tag might be appropriate.
JhowieNitnek (2023-12-27 13:00:36+00:00): They do as i have created the wikidata and edited the commons. But I think renaming the commons and the Wikidata would be appropriate.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-24 01:57:56+00:00): Done to test how marking GC Hwy as construction area during GC Light Rail building will work?
Oisín (2023-12-29 14:33:30+00:00): Vermutlich ist mit dieser Änderung die Kreuzung komplett verzogen wurden. Kann das bitte jemand wieder rückgängig machen?
tjhorner (2023-12-24 01:39:10+00:00): Great tree
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-29 19:55:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11447699947/history - ele tag is surely wrong here
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-02 07:11:18+00:00): see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4737997
Moy palaboy (2025-12-29 10:19:50+00:00): Tracking this # 099977153021
Branko Kokanovic (2023-12-30 16:35:15+00:00): ojha, vec par puta ja brisem ref:RS:kucni_broj sa ove zgrade: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/486671496, a ti vracas:) Pretpostavljam da je slucajno, da samo obuhvatis selekcijom sve i stavis sve adrese na zgradu? Ako stvarno hoces da stavis ref:RS:kucni_broj na ovaj way, reci da razresimo. Ako je greska, ima resenja za to (zakacimo adresu za zgradu, izbacimo je van zgrade, unistimo taj broj 6 sa poste koji nije u RGZ-u...:)
user_11609320 (2023-12-24 02:33:38+00:00): you are only allowed to stay on paved roads due to contamination of the Hanford site
BubbaJuice (2023-12-24 02:45:26+00:00): voltages from logic and 115 kv to Bagdad based on FS statement (voltage was obvious from several sources however).
emersonveenstra (2024-01-26 21:09:26+00:00): Hi there,

When you added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1233712376#map=19/47.43277/-115.66009, did you mean to add "bicycle=no"? Were you trying to indicate that it is blocked or impassable?
Ozisafari (2024-01-26 23:48:04+00:00): Hi E
Yes, that's correct; it is blocked. The rail tunnel has been deemed unsafe by authorities and has been closed. A deviation has been cut through the forest to bypass the tunnel which still allows for a continuous track, I added the deviation at the same time (you can see it start about 400m west of the tunnel and joins the track to the north).
emersonveenstra (2024-02-01 13:01:50+00:00): Got it, thanks for the clarification!
pesticides (2023-12-27 06:02:24+00:00): Note that the sign does not limit the restriction to school days. It just says 7am-5pm.
tyfi (2023-12-24 03:27:42+00:00): Most SSRs in Missouri are improved versions of what used to be county roads, but it's a misnomer to call them county roads and highways.
MxxCon (2023-12-26 06:18:20+00:00): Swimming pools should be mapped to the feature that actually contain water, not pavement perimeter around it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145456697
IraGersh (2023-12-26 14:13:18+00:00): Ok.  will change if not already done so.
IraGersh (2023-12-27 03:19:03+00:00): I went to change it and saw it was already changed so I have to assume you changed it and would've expected it to be at Version 2 but its at Version 1.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-24 04:35:22+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15512
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-24 06:23:41+00:00): Block removed after contact with DWG.
emersonveenstra (2023-12-25 14:43:22+00:00): Hi there,

The building shape you changed here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/848230989 does not match any available aerial imagery. Can you please double check to make sure that it is correct? Thanks!
Dr Kludge (2024-01-12 17:55:06+00:00): I am working the area.  Take a look now please.
tyfi (2023-12-24 04:49:00+00:00): TIGER called this "County Highway VV", and that name caused it to get ref="MO VV" even though VV isn't actually here.
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-06-11 04:20:18+00:00): Thanks for your contribution.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145457340
felipeeugenio (2023-12-24 14:11:05+00:00): Buenos dias.
Se ve que borra un segmento importante del camino que se ve claramente en las fotos satelitales. Pasó algo?

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145457804
FS Patagonia (2023-12-24 15:53:30+00:00): Hola! Estoy alineando el trazado de la ruta, suavizando curvas y agregando datos faltantes. Edito el mapa con ID, por lo cual me es más cómodo eliminar segmentos y redibujarlos. Hoy mismo termino el trazado, así que no hay problema, saludos!
mataharimau (2024-03-25 03:42:18+00:00): I haven't hiked Wawasan for some time now. What happened to this trail?

I nearly remapped this trail as Strava still shows very strong heat signature. Perhaps, instead of deleting the trail completely, just delete the tags but leave the way on the map and add a note eg: "Dec2023: This trail is no longer usable because ___"
Mahdi Nameghi (2023-12-24 07:37:42+00:00): لطفا از اسامی روی تابلو ها برای نامگذاری معابر استفاده کنید
rskedgell (2023-12-24 07:15:59+00:00): Are the licenses of the site plan and council planning documents compatible with OpenStreetMap?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright_information_for_UK_mappers
Nij4t2 (2023-12-24 09:56:48+00:00): Thank you for asking @rskedgell.   Road positions were considerably based on gps track + satellite imagery.  While many of the building positions were based on satellite imagery of the area during building, some was based on imagery from the council and the property developer.  I now see the council 'map' site is indeed based on OS data, so some of the exact building locations may not be 'safe' on that basis.  What would be the correct way to undo / revert the changeset or otherwise remove unsafe changes?
Nij4t2 (2023-12-26 09:28:33+00:00): To avoid doubt, I've deleted the two building shapes that I likely based on council mapping, as the foundations for those two buildings are not visible on the aerial imagery. ref changeset: 145525063
Kovoschiz (2023-12-24 07:56:04+00:00): Please don't add descriptor labels to `name=` . That's for proper names only. It should be akin to what it would be named after completion.
Nakaner (2023-12-24 09:40:32+00:00): This changset has been reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145461719 where the comment was: Revert changeset 145458672 because the user created a building polygon across all countries between Belarus and Tanzania
luiswoo (2023-12-26 13:51:25+00:00): И зачем эти вандальные изменения?
Langlaeufer (2023-12-24 12:14:55+00:00): highway=pedestrian sollte bleiben, damit der Platz weiterhin für die Fußgängernavigation genutzt werden kann.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145459114
eggie (2023-12-24 10:30:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-12-24 10:33:35+00:00): Dag Arif..  Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode
mvg
eggie
Langlaeufer (2023-12-24 11:55:06+00:00): Hallo nicht Gefundne.
left:cycleway war schon korrekt. Es geht um die Seite an der Straße und nicht um die Fahrtrichtung der Radfahrer.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145459324
TrickyFoxy (2023-12-24 16:41:50+00:00): Похоже вы пытаетесь вносить опоры ЛЭП, но вносите автобусные остановки. Прекратите и воспользуйтесь нормальным редактором на сайте osm.org
eggie (2023-12-24 10:35:03+00:00): Dag Arif Dit adres bestaat hier niet. Zoek een adresnode  op en tag daar op bij svp.
MVG
eggoe
eggie (2023-12-24 10:38:22+00:00): Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
Geen spatie in postcodes in osm svp.
MVG
eggie
hatul (2023-12-26 17:06:53+00:00): שלום אורי

נקודות מיועדות לייצג אובייקטים בשטח, לא רק מידע על קו פרשת המים.
overflorian (2023-12-24 08:49:57+00:00): #CurrentMood
vincent_95 (2023-12-24 10:00:15+00:00): <3
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-12-24 18:24:57+00:00): Hi, features should only be added once. Currently it's added both as a node and on the building.

This looks like an apartment block, I assume people live there and they are not part of GoGoNano. So you should remove the tags added to the building.

Nothing describes what it is except description text. I recommend adding office=research or 	office=company

Is this just a legal address, or does GoGoNano really function there?
GoGoNano (2023-12-24 18:32:32+00:00): Hi,
Thank you very much for having a look on it.

Yes, I accidentally added it twice, as a node and the building. Didn't meant to do that but it was late when I noticed it. Node is fits better than building because like you mentioned, its apartment building. Our legal registration address is here but we also partly operate here. On the ground floor we have areas which is used as small warehouse. Also customers use this address for picking up their goods/orders. 
Development itself is going on different address but we do not have public access to it.
So its one of our locations which is legal address but also we actually(not fully) operate here.

I would love to provide more information whenever its needed.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-12-25 11:18:35+00:00): Thanks for a thorough answer.
I recommend to remove name, description and website from the building and add add office=research or office=company for the node.

You can do this at the bottom section "Tags" when you select the node or the building. 

You can also move the node closer to one of the staircase entrances or whatever entrance you are using. Just don't put it too close to the edge or those maps which want to display it, may have not room for the text.
mapko (2023-12-24 09:02:59+00:00): this is NOT direct member of relation International European route network
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-28 12:37:11+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1233778751/history has addr:housenumber = building that was added in this edit
Are you sure this building has "building" as an address number?
mavl (2023-12-25 13:41:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145498186 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2023-12-25 13:41:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145498186 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2023-12-25 13:41:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145498186 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2023-12-25 13:41:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145498186 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2023-12-25 13:41:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145498186 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2023-12-25 13:41:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145498186 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2023-12-25 13:41:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145498186 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2023-12-25 13:41:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145498186 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2023-12-25 13:41:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145498186 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2023-12-25 13:41:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145498186 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2023-12-25 13:41:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145498186 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
arukuni (2024-03-31 09:19:59+00:00): Z czego te zmiany wynikają?
Jest jakieś źródło tych zmian?
Po ich wprowadzeniu na Ortofotomapie wygląda jakby ktoś tory przesunął na chodnik.
Eurynomos (2024-04-01 07:26:56+00:00): Ruda Klary, robiliśmy tam niedawno remont  i przesunięcie zwrotnicy przed przystanek ( patrząc od  strony Rudy), poprawiłem tylko lokalizacje (względem czyjejś wcześniejszej zmiany) bo dwutor był za bardzo na wschód)
za źródło można "uznać" np. https://youtu.be/FhbDlkkFliY?si=2w0Y8uqFtwe6ZZTg&t=161

Ortofotomapa w przypadku Tramwajów Śląskich, jest mocno nieaktualna
arjunaraoc (2023-12-25 02:09:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). The corrected waterway could not be verified from Bing image layer. Hope you had the actual GPS coordinates for correcting the waterway. It is important to connect waterway all the way to a destination which will be another waterbody. Happy mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145462323
mavl (2023-12-25 13:41:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145498186 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
stillhart (2024-07-21 20:50:12+00:00): lovely detail on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151740426/history 
thanks
mavl (2023-12-25 13:41:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145498186 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-14 19:32:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147464049, 147464044, 147464035, 147464024 where the changeset comment is: revert von Edits, die auf noch nicht für OSM freigegebenen Daten der Landesvermessung RLP beruhen
mavl (2023-12-25 13:41:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145498186 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].