piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
RLakhani (2025-12-06 23:22:58+00:00): It's rich for you to be so condescending when you argued ad nauseam in a most illogical way that a Gurdwara is a town . 

As a road does not connect across the border, as in the numerous examples above, your claim is wrong. You cannot cross here for literally 60 years. This is not a temporary closure as the examples you compared it to.
RLakhani (2025-12-06 23:24:41+00:00): "For you to try and convince other people that it isn't, is merely an abitary choice that you're making, same with the Guru Nanak Highway, and all the other classification of highways you've changed."

You were the one who tried to arbitrarily upgrade the priority of this road.
RLakhani (2025-12-07 00:02:01+00:00): "As well as the official surveys of Pakistan:. https://surveyofpakistan.gov.pk/SiteImage/Downloads/province_map_punjab.pdf
"
Incorrect. Look at the legend. The thickness of this line is listed as "other," not secondary, not major.
RLakhani (2025-12-07 00:06:00+00:00): https://surveyofpakistan.gov.pk/SiteImage/Downloads/province_map_punjab.pdf

This actually proves what I said. This legend does not show this as a "main" or "secondary" road, but instead "other." Thank you for demonstrating my point in this regard - it appears n
o


The rest of your maps are not official - one is a relief agency and the other is real estate website. Only the official map you provided is relevant.

The LCCI map is extremely crudely drawn, and doesn't show the Barki road reaching the border as you incorrectly claimed.
RLakhani (2025-12-07 00:09:51+00:00): Im going to refer this to the Data Working group. You shouldn't make any changes until they weigh in.
Jacksonville (2025-12-07 20:00:40+00:00): You can refer it to the data working group - and please keep in the loop. However, I don't get how you claim the official maps support you.

The official maps have the following road classifications. 

1. Motorway
2. GT Road.
3. Other "main road", what we call a "shah-rah" in Urdu

An example of this given on the map is the Lahore-Qasur Road, and the same colour has been used for the Barki Road. 

> You were the one who tried to arbitrarily upgrade the priority of this road.

Yes backed by other maps, such as the official maps. I've given you my reasons. Your only reason is "the border is closed" which is the same reason you've been repeating. I've given you several reasons. 

> The LCCI map is extremely crudely drawn

The line literally touch the border line, I don't understand how clear you want it to be. You tried claiming that the Burki road is somehow disconnected from the Indian road, even though you can literally see from satellite view the roads are physically connected.
Jacksonville (2025-12-07 20:05:45+00:00): > It's rich for you to be so condescending when you argued ad nauseam in a most illogical way 

You're such a rude person, I tried to solve this in civil manner - I invited you to several discussion both through changesets and inboxes, yet you stayed stubborn.

It's disappointing seeing you making comments like these.
Jacksonville (2025-12-07 20:12:35+00:00): > As a road does not connect across the border, as in the numerous examples above, your claim is wrong. You cannot cross here for literally 60 years. This is not a temporary closure as the examples you compared it to. 

Yeah, and Pakistani's can't cross over into India - yet you foolishly tried to apply this logic to the N-5 Highway as well as the Kasur-Firozpur GT Roads, which are 4 lane highways. 

When did visa policy ever become relevant to the classification of highways?

> The rest of your maps are not official - one is a relief agency and the other is real estate website. Only the official map you provided is relevant.

Okay, I'm here to discuss but please don't try to be misleading. The real estate map references an official Lahore City District Map. The real estate website didn't create the map.

Both official maps, the survey map and the Lahore city district map prove my point.
Jacksonville (2025-12-26 23:31:59+00:00): Hi any update on this? If not, I'll be starting a thread on the OSM Forums?
NeisBot (2025-11-24 08:48:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 43 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/28151669 v8 | crossings=19
https://osm.org/way/1194923879 v3 | crossings=13
https://osm.org/way/1194923873 v2 | crossings=11

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175056142
compdude (2026-02-06 05:09:59+00:00): What were you intending to do with this? Not sure why you'd draw a secondary_link in a circle like this.
Natfoot (2026-02-06 06:28:11+00:00): https://www.project.woodinville.gov/eastrail-trail
compdude (2026-02-06 06:34:21+00:00): Oh, I see. It's supposed to be a roundabout. I'm going to mark it as proposed since it doesn't appear to be under construction as far as I'm aware.
compdude (2026-02-06 06:37:47+00:00): Okay, I fixed the tagging so that it would properly show up as under construction.

Thanks for clarifying what is going on here!
ilias_ (2025-11-24 22:47:13+00:00): This changeset was reverted. Please don't map imaginary tunnels.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175087962
Sylabowy Kot (2025-11-24 09:10:39+00:00): Oraz kilka poprawek.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-11-24 11:23:15+00:00): Teren na północ od Ustronie Mokotów na pewno wymaga dodatkowych szlifów.
NeisBot (2025-11-24 09:30:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-24 09:30:43+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Event planning company in Chino CA"
Filip009 (2026-04-07 07:52:11+00:00): Zdravím, fakt sú tu mýtne brány? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13327758594 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13327758595
Mirecnet (2026-04-07 09:53:49+00:00): Ano, 
myto je 5 € za vstup a parkovanie. 
V pripade kupenia sluzieb v areale nad 8 € je vstup zdarma.
Filip009 (2026-04-07 10:13:04+00:00): Také mýtne brány, ako na diaľnici zvyknú byť, tam sú? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Dartford_Crossing_Toll.jpg https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:barrier%3Dtoll_booth

Alebo sa jedná skorej o automaty vydávajúce parkovacie lístky https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:vending%3Dparking_tickets, alebo predajcu lístkov v búdke https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dticket?
seewäldler (2025-11-25 17:24:48+00:00): Danke, ich war dort immer noch nicht vorbeigekommen und hätte ihn am südlichen Ende vermutet.
mcliquid (2025-11-25 17:43:25+00:00): Gerne :) Ich bin die neue Runde gelaufen "Gegen das Vergessen" und hab am Ende den Wegweiser gesehen und mich an deine Notiz erinnert. Wenn du vor dem Tor steht und rechts beim Grüncontainer nach hinten läufst, kommt zuerst ein langer Banner mit einer Wiederholung der Schilder für den Vergessen-Pfad, ein paar Meter weiter ist ein grünes Schild mit Pfeil "Erlebnispfad noch 200m". Die Metalltüre zum Pfad ist aber ohne Klinke und abgeschlossen. Ich gehe davon aus, dass man nur mit Anmeldung rein kommt.
NeisBot (2025-11-24 09:42:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-24 09:42:43+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Custom PC builder in Bangalore"
PCBuildz (2025-11-24 14:22:48+00:00): Hi, NeisBot. I have made changes to the description, please recheck. I had just copy-pasted the chatgpt provided description here. If any other changes are required to be made, please do tell & I will make the edits.
Binnette (2025-11-26 21:17:01+00:00): Hello, je viens de voir une erreur sur la species. C'est "Cercis sili__quastrum" et non "Cercis sili__s__quastrum"
Ville_Echirolles_Environnement (2025-11-27 11:06:06+00:00): Bien vu, merci ! Ça fait partie des espèces qui ne sont pas en saisie semie-automatique sur le plugin Every Door donc on n'échappe malheureusement pas à des coquilles de temps en temps...
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-01 18:56:43+00:00): na nazwy historyczne jest OpenHistoricalMap, nie OpenStreetMap

a wsadzanie ich do name:pl jest wprost błędne i szkodliwe, proszę przestań

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175372246
tyr_asd (2026-01-04 16:38:34+00:00): FYI: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5105047
welzheimerwald (2026-02-22 12:05:40+00:00): Wieso wurde der Straßenname Salzahammer rausgelöscht? Wenn ich mich recht erinnere, hat der Weg ein Straßenschild (Gleich beim Hundekackbeutelspender nach der Salzabrücke)
SKald (2026-02-22 12:48:14+00:00): Stimmt das war ein Fehler meinerseits. Beabsichtigt war nur für die Brücken von der B24 her.
Danke fürs fixen.
pitfire (2025-11-24 09:56:47+00:00): Changed description>Missing pedestrian crossing without road markings
LordGarySugar (2025-12-24 00:33:46+00:00): I've reverted this changeset alongside thirteen others - they all added Dutch names to footpaths and roads in the UK and Germany.
Metzor (2025-11-29 12:15:26+00:00): Thanks, Mateusz, for cleaning this up!
NeisBot (2025-11-24 10:12:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 27 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/1160680123 v5 | crossings=8
https://osm.org/way/1177096440 v2 | crossings=7
https://osm.org/way/1356165993 v3 | crossings=5

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1876656302 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175059312
Cebderby (2025-11-24 10:55:51+00:00): 2 unintended node drags reverted in changeset 175060890.  (Intended cycle-related changes are retained).  Node drags can happen on moving the map during editing in iD, if the cursor is on a map point at the start of the drag/move action.
joost schouppe (2026-01-06 10:04:31+00:00): De school die je hier had toegevoegd was volgens mij reeds gemapped als "LUCA campus Sint-Lucas Architectuur". Ik heb een en ander hier vereenvoudigd: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176895091
Laat maar weten als ik het verkeerd zie!
AndyB_66 (2025-11-27 09:55:10+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-11-28 01:01:59+00:00): Merhaba. Lütfen değişik açıklamalarınızda ne yaptığınızı kısaca özetleyiniz. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Doğan Taşdelen Bulvarı'na paralel isimsiz yola(way/707080392) "Doğan Taşdelen Bulvarı" adını eklemişsiniz. Eski uydu görüntülerine göre bir yol(way/1453295735) çizmişsiniz, yeni görüntülerde burada bir yol değil bina mevcut. Bankanın zaten branch=* etiketinde mevcut olan şube adını name= etiketine tekrar yazmışsınız. Bu değişikliklerinizi geri aldım.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175219711
maro21 (2025-11-24 22:51:06+00:00): Czy mógłbyś robić lokalne zestawy zmian?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Zestaw_zmian#Geograficzny_rozmiar_zestaw%C3%B3w_zmian
abs8_josm (2025-11-24 11:55:58+00:00): Indien mogelijk, gebruik iets betere changeset comments zodat er iets van context kan worden gegeven

mvg
no details provided here (2025-12-14 20:08:37+00:00): This road appears to have a non-English name recently added.  I'll be in the area in the next week to check if/why it might be called this name?  Presumably it should be East End Road.
Tomas09 (2025-11-24 22:58:11+00:00): https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lijst_van_hoogste_gebouwen_van_Arnhem en ook zelf inschatten
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-25 00:58:41+00:00): DWG revert - incorrect deletion

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175090345
Kovoschiz (2025-11-24 17:18:08+00:00): `building:material=` is defined as the cladding/facade/exterior / external surfacing, not the internal structures (although this may be the same if only painted)
mavl (2025-12-03 11:41:00+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, у вас есть разрешение от компании Яндекс на использование её данных?
yelisey90 (2025-11-24 15:12:11+00:00): Hi! I've fixed dome tagging errors:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175071408
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-23 08:21:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856
silversurfer83 (2025-11-24 16:00:53+00:00): Hi there :)

you added traffic signals to a node along a forest in Russia. I guess that was unintentional so I will undo that. 

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175060468
bxl-forever (2025-11-24 11:49:09+00:00): Hello,

You have just created a new university here… inside an existing area tagged as amenity=college.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238135161

This is not correct, such areas should not be nested.

Could you please explain what you have been trying to do here?  If you are familiar with the situation, can you please describe it or link to a document where we can see if there are two separate parts here and who runs them?

Thanks in advance.
joost schouppe (2026-01-06 10:07:21+00:00): I've reverted this change (and a similar one nearby)
GlobalScan (2025-11-27 06:23:32+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Проезд, который вы нарисовали здесь https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1453301864/history не существует - летом 2025 его убрали, на этом месте сделали сквер с другими тротуарами, рядом парковки. Вы использовали неактуальные источники.
pesec (2025-11-27 06:30:18+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Спасибо за комментарий.
Более актуальных данных, чем открытые яндекс-зеркала у меня нет.
Попробую исправить.
mavl (2025-12-08 16:30:13+00:00): Здравствуйте. Яндекс Зеркала нельзя использовать. Их данные уже откатывали не один раз. Также нельзя использовать Яндекс Карты.  
Можно использовать Яндекс Панорамы.
pesec (2025-12-09 06:15:45+00:00): Здравствуйте, mavl.
Яндекс-зеркала как конкретный источник данных не указывается.
А использую я их для сверки в своём городе того, что могу увидеть и проверить сам. Формальна никакого нарушения нет. Упоминать более не буду, дабы не будить всевидящее око.
yelisey90 (2025-11-24 14:45:04+00:00): Hi! You have already been warned not to include the type of business into the name: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175025600
Repeated unconstructive editing may lead to blocking.
Dodko (2025-11-24 17:44:04+00:00): Nedávaj do adresy ref:minvskaddress kým sa nenaučíš urobiť kompletnú adresu.
Tým sa označujú už úplné, skontrolované adresy.
mrpulley (2025-12-20 09:37:24+00:00): Have the M1 signs gone up yet? My voice recording from 17 November has this as still A1 (I haven't been back since then).
bxl-forever (2025-11-24 11:45:11+00:00): Dear @geoTD.

Once and for all, please do NOT add false or duplicate addresses to buildings.

And please do NOT duplicate sint-Lucas university.

The campus is already mapped as a multipolygon, which correctly includes its both parts.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19847043

I wrote to you several times to warn you that you are adding errors to OSM, by creating multiple universities in this area.

Please be respectful of our work, please read the explanations that have been emailed to you, and please stop pushing the same bad edits over and over.
smallCat (2025-11-24 11:59:32+00:00): some 동 is in countryside and not suitable for place=quarter, @Lepuse will modify it.
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:48:11+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Storage facility in Greenville"
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:48:11+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-13 21:20:16+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175077638
bxl-forever (2025-11-24 11:57:55+00:00): Hello, @geoTD.

This message is to inform you that your edit has been reverted.

It looks like you are interested in mapping a university campus and dependencies.  Fine.  But please be considerate of the correct tagging practice.

We would be grateful to you by please stopping pushing the same faulty edits over and over.  This changeset damages the address system (where you always want to force monolingual addresses, as if you had not noticed that all the addresses here are written in the two official languages) and one more time you create extra universities to the map.  "Sint-Lucas Herenwoning" is a residence, not a university.  If a researcher issues a query to measure how many universities there are in Brussels, they should not get students’ dorms in the total.

If that is so important to you, perhaps we can add this building inside the university multipolygon.  But please reply to the multiple changeset comments that have been sent to you over the past few weeks, so that we can discuss how we can improve the map.
jopi56 (2025-11-24 19:11:49+00:00): Hallo,
die Baustelle sollte als landuse=construction erfasst werden.
area=yes ist überflüssig.
zusätzlich kann dann das Tag construction gesetzt werden.
nikola babic kd (2025-11-24 11:57:15+00:00): This is already available on Google Maps
Taktaal (2026-04-04 10:07:30+00:00): Why did you change https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2295971 to a "footway"? This makes no sense.
muralito (2025-11-24 18:03:24+00:00): Hola. Gracias por la colaboracion pero no te quedo bien mapeado. Tomá como ejemplo el ITS del Buceo.
TinPetreković (2025-11-24 12:41:41+00:00): The Grand Avenue was merged back together in changeset 175064999 because it was nedlessly split since the same restriction applies to the entire part of the road

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175064999
eggie (2025-11-24 16:03:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback....   start_date hoort op de gebouwomtrek.. Dus niet op de adresnode. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
AndyB_66 (2025-11-24 16:00:23+00:00): Usuń zbędny tag 'proposed=motorway', proszę.
felipeeugenio (2025-11-24 14:18:26+00:00): Hola. Te agradecemos enormemente tus ediciones y eres bienvenido a aportar cuanto puedas. Sin embargo, te pedimos por favor hacer ediciones más pequeñas, con tamaño acotado de elementos a agregar. Mapear no es difícil, pero requiere de una curva de aprendizaje. 
hay varias cosas hechas de manera incorrecta en esta edición. Lo que con gusto repararemos. No se trata de nada grave y es lo que pasa con todo mapero nuevo.
por lo pronto, por favor tener cuidado con lo que eliminas y, para cuadrar edificios, puedes usar la letra Q.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175064953
bartgron (2025-12-06 18:49:44+00:00): Panie usunąłeś Pan junction = roundabout z ronda
flarkey (2026-05-02 08:56:37+00:00): No, I did not 'doctor' this map to add a power line that isn't there. This overhead powerline is clearly visible on Google Street View and on the Energy Provider's webpage. This line goes up from the roadside at Tyddyn-uchaff farmhouse to power the pumping station and underground reservoir at Crest Mawr. It is a 230v 3-phase line that was the source of a fault of sparking overhead powerlines, reported on 3 January 2012, which was caused by Cyclone Ulli. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclone_Ulli

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Denbigh+Golf+Club/@53.1942585,-3.4374594,3a,75y,90.11h,88.67t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1subRpPyJ1SE1UZGVfSgTd5Q!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D1.334217014607347%26panoid%3DubRpPyJ1SE1UZGVfSgTd5Q%26yaw%3D90.11289968810033!7i16384!8i8192!4m6!3m5!1s0x48652e92766ccb3b:0xa5a49b5f59ba9c68!8m2!3d53.1961853!4d-3.4378933!16s%2Fm%2F0108g_w3?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDQyOS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D

https://www.spenergynetworks.co.uk/pages/connectmore_interactive_map.aspx
user_5589 (2025-11-25 11:35:19+00:00): This is NOT a motorway. It is a test track.

Please reverse this edit.
Cebderby (2025-11-25 13:20:40+00:00): Fully reverted.

@World_Winner next time tell your customer that their request is completely unacceptable.  However you are responsible for your edits and will be reported for vandalism if necessary
World_Winner (2025-11-26 06:19:14+00:00): “Hi user_5589 and Cebderby, 
Thank you for getting in touch and reverting the changeset. Your comments are duly noted. My intention is to collaborate constructively and avoid any future conflict. Thank you for your understanding.”
felipeeugenio (2025-11-24 14:33:19+00:00): Hola. No toda área verde es un parque.
Una duda: usas los parques para jugar a alguna app?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175065682
Hufkratzer (2025-11-25 19:43:57+00:00): Hi,
was soll das, die Reitplätze umzutaggen? Die waren richtig als Reitplätzen getaggt und jetzt sind sie falsch als Reitanlagen getaggt, vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian) und darin enth. Links.

Bitte erkläre mir, wie du auf diese Idee gekommen bist. Würde mich wirklich interessieren, denn es ist mir ein Rätsel. Und bitte ändere es zurück.
Hufkratzer (2025-11-25 19:56:19+00:00): Beispiel für Reitanlage mit Reitplättzen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791216767#map=17/51.637770/7.154192&layers=PN
LEA SYSTEMS (2025-11-25 20:27:57+00:00): Hallo Hufkratzer,
vielen Dank für deine Nachricht. Vielleicht kommt es mir nur so vor, aber deine Nachricht ist sehr aggressiv formuliert. Deswegen möchte ich zunächst auf den CoC von OSM hinweisen ;) Siehe hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_Code_of_Conduct_(Draft)

Nun zu der Anpassung: Uns hat ein Antrag auf Änderung per E-Mail erreicht, dass euer Hof bzw. die Reitplätze als Cannabis-Konsumverbotszonen in der Bubatzkarte App angezeigt werden. Wir sind keine Experten und hoffen deswegen immer auf einen regen Austausch mit der OSM Community, wenn wir mal etwas falsch machen. Von daher danke ich dir für den Hinweis. Gerne ändern wir den Eintrag erst mal zurück und suchen intern nach einer neuen Lösung, sodass der Hof korrekt auf der OSM und bei uns in der Karte angezeigt wird. Hast du eventuell einen Vorschlag? Wir scannen nach dem Tag "leisure=pitch", der wohl automatisch bei Reitplätzen hinzugefügt wird.

Beste Grüße