piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ivanbranco (2023-04-18 08:54:00+00:00): Ciao Giovanni,

hai cambiato dei valori precisi (casa, condominio ecc.) con un valore meno preciso (yes). Come mai?
woodpeck (2023-05-15 09:29:10+00:00): In this changeset you have created a railway "superroute" that meanwhile has grown to over 18k members. Is this really an observable, verifiable object that deserves to be in OSM? You describe it as a "corridor" but what has been mapped is a very precise line of meanwhile over 18.000 pieces of railway track. Frankly I think that it should be deleted & I will post on the community forum about it to involve more community members in the discussion.
SekeRob (2023-05-15 09:48:14+00:00): Thoroughly times out on my computer... unviewable. This is in browser with the standard Carto map. Tried in JOSM asking for all member as it initially shows as loaded 'incomplete'. Same, times out. Yes you can add members piece by piece and now it's a major pain to anyone who ever is going to try to change an element anywhere along the line.

Corridor: A railway corridor is the area reserved by the railway companies upon which the rail, stations, emplacements etc are positioned. I've mapped a view miles but only as filler in urban areas.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-05-15 10:31:00+00:00): How do you know which specific rail tracks belong in this category?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-05-15 10:31:21+00:00): Also, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/railway-superroutes/99110 (login with OSM account)
AurélienQ (2023-05-15 16:55:35+00:00): If you check the tags, you can find the source.
AurélienQ (2023-05-15 16:57:14+00:00): I want to tell that it's normal that some relation exist but can't be saw on the iD, like national boundary. But this fact does not prevent to change this relation.
AurélienQ (2023-05-15 16:58:39+00:00): I think we dont have the same definition of a railway corridor. This is the corridor defined by the European Union, because it's it who is to the origin of these corridors.
AurélienQ (2023-05-15 16:59:08+00:00): I thank you because you had open a discuss on the forum.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-05-15 18:14:24+00:00): > If you check the tags, you can find the source.

I tried using https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1uZ9

    <tag k="name:fr" v="Corridor Méditerranéen"/>
    <tag k="network" v="RNE"/>
    <tag k="ref" v="RCF 6"/>
    <tag k="route" v="railway"/>
    <tag k="type" v="route_master"/>
    <tag k="wikidata" v="Q2895444"/>
    <tag k="wikipedia" v="fr:Corridor méditerranéen"/>


so, was it copied from wikipedia page? Or https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corridor_m%C3%A9diterran%C3%A9en more specifically? But it does not appear to have such info
AurélienQ (2023-05-15 18:38:23+00:00): Ok, I just forget the source. But I add it now.
stevea (2023-05-17 23:00:21+00:00): OSM doesn't enter overweight, difficult relations representing continent-wide planning corridors, which are actually multiple-corridor and contain spurs.

OSM does make route=railway relations, sometimes at a (rail-)company-wide level, sometimes at a country-wide level.

Accordingly, I'm about to break apart this almost 19000 member beast into at least five pieces, per country.  The proposed and construction elements will be deleted.  Still, some child relations will still contain thousands of elements and must be broken up further.  I may not have the local / rail company knowledge required to further subdivide accurately, I attempt to simply make the data manageable given current tools and platforms.
stevea (2023-05-18 00:36:42+00:00): I have broken apart the superroute so instead of >18k ways, it now contains six relations (one for each country).

Membership #s are:
Spain 6771 members
France 6103 members
Italy 3444 members
Slovenia 832 members
Serbia 539 members
Hungary 1244 members.

So, While Slovenia an Serbia are OK and Hungary might be "maxed out/borderline," all of Italy and especially Spain and France will need to be still further broken apart.  Let's say to <2000 members each, as a next step.

I may have made some errors, but this is a nudge in the right direction (smaller relations that are more properly constructed to OSM standards).  The job is not finished and should be continued by European mappers.
woodpeck (2023-05-18 07:47:28+00:00): stevea, thank you for your effort though I still think it might be in vain, and the relations might have to be deleted - you have reduced the "this relation makes mapping hell for people" problem but not the "this isn't really something that can be verified/observed" problem.
stevea (2023-05-18 07:52:56+00:00): Yes, I thought it might go there, but a "slow, breakup / devolution" is better than a "quick, full obliteration."

What I was trying to do was to see if the country-level components might (still? yet?) be fashioned / crafted into something that is a rail relation that is both sensible in a rail sense, a "this is how we do rail around here" (European countries) sense AND an OSM "well-formed rail relations" sense.

Maybe this (now "these") are not that:  if these are to be deleted, well, at least the railway=rail elements remain.
eggie (2023-04-18 06:35:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Zo te zien heb je de landuse aangepast. Dat is gelukt.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=135032202
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-04-18 06:55:23+00:00): Dag GL  Het verloop en de tracktype heb ik aangepast. 
access=private toegevoegd
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-04-18 06:51:57+00:00): Dag GL   Lijkt me inderdaad allemaal prive via dat erf.
Evt tracktype=grade?  erbij
MVG
eggie
Note_Fixer (2023-04-17 20:56:20+00:00): no more pool, is gone
eggie (2023-04-18 06:49:19+00:00): Dag GL  Je vraagt feedback  Lijkt me oke zo.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-04-18 07:07:26+00:00): Dag Sander.. 
Je vraagt feedback
tidal en salt  kun je ook wel weglaten hier.
Is het geen rietkraag?
natural=wetland
wetland=reedbed.

MVG
eggie
zorglubu (2023-04-18 08:56:37+00:00): Bonjour,

Je vois que vous modifiez ce rond-point. Pouvez-vous me confirmer que le nouveau rond-point correspond bien aux images Bing  et non pluss aux images BDOrtho IGN ?
Merci.

Au passage, ce serait bien de mettre des commentaires sur vo changesets, comme indiqué ici :  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications#Pourquoi_devrais-je_utiliser_les_commentaires_de_Changeset_?

Merci beaucoup ;-)
zorglubu (2023-04-19 12:30:21+00:00): Rebonjour,

renseignement pris, la forme du giratoire est effectivement redevenue circulaire.
Je l'ai un peu repris et reconstruit les relations des lignes de bus.
Si vous en voyez et ne savez pas trop comment les traiter, je vous conseille de plutôt laisser une note décrivant la modification à faire, ou alors invitant à vérifier la continuité des lignes de bus, merci :-)

Bonne continuation sur OSM !
NieWnen (2023-04-18 08:51:03+00:00): Droga została połączona z granicą parafii, a nie ulicą.
NieWnen (2023-04-18 12:00:56+00:00): Poprawiłem (135056319).
kachadi (2023-04-18 12:07:37+00:00): Great, thanks for fixing it!
silversurfer83 (2023-04-17 21:58:16+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap :)

thank your for your contribiution. I'd like to take this edit of yours (a changeset) to welcome you as a fellow mapper and to give you some helpful hints on how to map better. One of the usual ways of communicating is through these comments, so here goes:

In this changeset (cs) you edited things on more than one continent. This isn't very helpful and you can find the explanation here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Above link leads you to an article of the OpenStreetMap (OSM) wiki where the community writes down most of the "rules" to which we'd like to adhere since there's millions of people using this database every day.

At least one of the "landuse=residential" you added snapped to a street. This means it shares a point (or node) with the highway that borders the landuse. We try to avoid that.

In most of your changes to date you added missing buildings or changed the shape of existing buildings. To be hones: they look a bit crappy. BUT, there's an easy fix :)
After drawing a building you simply hit "Q" on your keyboard and the angels all get squared. Most buildings have pretty square angles so please do that.

In closing I'd like to leave you with a few helpful articles of the wiki and wish you happy mapping

silversurfer83

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide
HansWürstchen (2023-04-18 20:26:41+00:00): Hallo Pappnose, willkommen bei OSM, beachte doch bitte, das OSM eine Karte ist und kein Veranstaltungsplaner, oder kostenlose Werbeplattform.
Wenn vor Ort Objekte dauerhaft existieren, können diese erfasst werden, ggf. mit Hinweisen, die Veranstaltung selbst, inkl. Werbeslogan jedoch nicht. Vielleicht kannst Du ja mit Deinen Kenntnissen die Objekte ergänzen, viel Spaß weiterhin.
YomanNH (2023-05-23 05:50:56+00:00): Czemu ciąg pieszo-rowerowy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1036652615 zmieniłeś z highway=path na highway=footway?
gpserror (2023-05-15 16:12:28+00:00): Hi, in note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3690682 there was a lot of violations that showed up in this changeset, as I'm not local I have to rely on imagery and this road does not appear to be dual carriageway for the whole length.  Was this changed recently beyond the available satellite imagery?
Kovoschiz (2023-04-19 04:07:57+00:00): 1. Please don't use `=*_link` for forks. This is supported by some routers and  applications
2. I made this `=primary` as you can technically continue on Harcourt Rd, and as a connection to Cotton Tree Dr. Moreover it is to distinguished between the ground-level `=secondary` section downstream.
Kovoschiz (2023-04-19 04:09:41+00:00): (In US terminology, is a form of braided ramps)
Kovoschiz (2023-04-19 04:11:37+00:00): (1. So I mean it is still part of the main line of Harcourt Rd, as such should not have `=*_link` used)
Himké (2023-05-09 18:20:25+00:00): Thanks for your comment, Kovoschiz. 

Is this the segment you are referring to as a "braided ramp"? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93096386 - IMHO this segment is a c/d road with frontage access and thus I've set it as secondary. In regard to the fork: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160581522 - I see it is a transition lane that facilitates traffic movement between two parallel through-routes (the mainline and its c/d road). Also want to note that router support is subservient to data integrity. 

Happy mapping!
VictorIE (2023-04-19 23:18:35+00:00): This seems to be a mini-roundabout https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1036608599#map=19/53.24231/-6.13953 View is a bit distorted.
gogorm (2023-04-20 20:42:15+00:00): I found it mapped as a (non-mini) roundabout with one of the nodes on the circle being a mini roundabout tag on one of the nodes in the circular way. I wasn't certain that it was a mini roundabout so decide to simply delete the mini roundabout tag and keep the circular way.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-17 22:50:20+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10820484584

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
sowa705 (2023-04-18 08:02:14+00:00): Cześć, to nie jest do końca zwykły paczkomat tylko nowy appkomat (nie ma ekranu, pozwala odebrać tylko z aplikacji) więc myśle że powinien być nieco inaczej oznaczony
NorthCrab (2023-04-22 05:16:49+00:00): Hmm, interesujące. W takim razie chyba usunę/zmienię z niego:
brand	Paczkomat InPost
brand:wikidata	Q110970254
Ponieważ one odnoszą się stryktę do paczkomatów "tradycyjnych" :P Już się tym zajmę. Pozdrawiam i dzięki za kontrybucję !
emersonveenstra (2023-04-17 23:26:48+00:00): Hi,

Why did you delete the parking aisle and sidewalk?
silversurfer83 (2023-04-18 14:44:49+00:00): Moin :)

Bei Flugplätzen kannst du dir mal die aeroway tags anschauen. Zum Beispiel https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dfuel
Aktuell sorgst du nämlich dafür, dass dein Navi dich mit dem Auto auf die Landebahn führt, wenn du in der Gegend nach Sprit suchst ;)

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135035329
John Grubb (2023-04-17 23:21:30+00:00): Will sort the overlapping areas later this week.
John Grubb (2023-04-18 16:46:22+00:00): Okay - fixed for now. Will collecting more data at the w/e.
JeroenvanderGun (2023-04-18 10:26:54+00:00): This is the administrative boundary on the bridge, which per international treaty differs from the normal administrative boundary.
user_177389 (2023-04-18 20:19:48+00:00): This is not an administrative boundary in the OSM sense (nor is it a bridge). Boundary lines can also be used alone, but must then form closed rings. So this line is a broken boundary.
Yonseca (2023-04-18 01:01:40+00:00): Incluye también los de García Abril y Margarita Xirgu
JJIglesias (2023-04-18 02:32:39+00:00): El "Excelente trabajo", genera mas de 40 errores en JOSM y ID, es una importacion de datos NO consultada y se monto sobre datos subyacentes que tienen errores de alineacion. A que te refieres con  "Excelente"? Revisaste el area?
JJIglesias (2023-04-18 02:33:31+00:00): En particular la Avenida 29 de Enero y la Avenida Escultor...
rodolfovargas (2023-04-18 03:27:38+00:00): Creo que olvidas muy rápido lo "colaborativo".
Recomiendo que reflexiones mucho sobre ese concepto.
JJIglesias (2023-04-18 04:14:20+00:00): No tengo q reflexionar nada al respecto. Lo colaborativo es como participas. Si lo que pones genera errores No importa que sea colaborativo o no. Siguen siendo errores. Colaborativo NO es EXCUSA para mediocre, al menos para mi, tal vez para ti si...
JJIglesias (2023-04-18 04:17:23+00:00): Y precisamente lo colaborativo esta en corregir errores y que alguien revise lo q hicistes, para q los posibles errores No queden en el mapa. Creo q tu confundes precisamente ese concepto. Colaborativo no es Mediocridad, accidental o intencional...
JJIglesias (2023-04-18 04:21:28+00:00): Un tema q parece ser una practica comun en Bolivia, a nombre de "comunitario", "colaborativo" etc, aceptamos cualquier macana y encima la aplaudimos.... 
Viejo dicho: de buenas intenciones esta pavimentado el camino al infierno...
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-21 20:49:45+00:00): Please do not remove the "path" tag from cartpaths.
marczoutendijk (2025-08-31 13:00:30+00:00): Hi Josuer,
In this edit:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892131870/history/2
you introduced landuse=2
What do you mean with that value?

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Josuer (2025-08-31 19:41:49+00:00): Hi Marc,
It was an error and it is already fixed. 
Thank you for noticing it. 
Best,
Josuer.
marczoutendijk (2025-08-31 19:48:27+00:00): Thanks!
Yonseca (2023-04-18 02:34:13+00:00): Deshace la edición #135038014, en la que puse el puente en la rotonda equivoada
Frans S (2023-04-18 12:26:01+00:00): Hello.
Thanks for mapping.
Please map more accurate by following the rooflines and square the building. 
The object with triangle walls is not building to my opinion. 
Best regards
user_5359 (2023-04-18 04:54:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/196132235/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
tyfi (2023-04-18 03:13:49+00:00): My interpretation of "minor arterial" is strongly highway=secondary, but special circumstances can bump it up to primary or down to tertiary. IMO this is not a special circumstance, though, as Richardson is a commercial corridor that is completely avoidable if your destination isn't along it.
SherbetS (2023-06-02 19:19:55+00:00): Hello tyfi,

On this object, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10820829745

you used the tag man_made=communciations_tower, when the correct tagging for the object is man_made=mast. please consider this in future edits

Thanks,
-SherbetS
tyfi (2023-06-02 19:37:42+00:00): Gotcha, thanks!
joel56dt (2023-04-18 04:31:48+00:00): Heads up that the houses you added no longer exist. I removed them in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133573934
antiviro (2023-04-21 14:22:30+00:00): Mapping practice in this region is to card developments out of basins. Do not discriminate on types of development.
Local-Mapper (2023-04-21 16:53:25+00:00): I'm sorry, but I don't understand your comment. What edit did I make that you believe is incorrect?
antiviro (2023-04-22 01:50:15+00:00): Your "corrected basins" in the Houston region does not follow the mapping practices in the area. Large areas of Houston are 'reservoir areas', with more than 300,000 people living within them. When those areas are developed, they are carved out of the basin. Your edits didn't follow this, respecting residential and most commercial developments in reservoir areas, but with no regard for recreational land development. Don't discriminate between different types of land development.
antiviro (2023-06-11 00:21:34+00:00): My apologies Local-Mapper; when I clicked on some of the modifications it showed your handle. When referring the issue to another mapper, he dug a little deeper and saw it was actually someone else. Apologies to you.
Local-Mapper (2023-06-11 00:23:48+00:00): No worries, glad you were able to figure it out!
user_5359 (2023-04-18 04:36:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between name and description!
MxxCon (2023-04-18 05:10:37+00:00): Hello.
You added a bunch of parking spaces and tagged them as parking=street_side.
As documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side the definition of OSM's parking=street_side doesn't match what I see on the satellite imagery. These are just regular, private parking lots.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135039569
h551w (2023-04-29 17:41:18+00:00): Oh, nice! Yeah, there's not really any hard rules on at what point things ought to be added as proposed, the wiki just says "only real plans." Sounds to me like that'd exclude the BOI/SLC Amtrak route that's more of a dream for now, but the Greenbelt here seems pretty safe to include to me. Admittedly I may be somewhat biased since I really want to be able to ride all the way from Lucky Peak Dam to Caldwell
h551w (2023-04-29 17:41:25+00:00): This is also reminding me to check on the status of the proposed bridge to reconnect the Greenbelt where it breaks at E 52nd St in Garden City
Allison P (2024-02-24 08:35:53+00:00): Check housenumber on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/761870630, parity looks incorrect
Jarrardi (2024-02-25 04:54:59+00:00): The P&Z map shows 915, but yeah, I guess I didn't notice how inconsistent it was. I've put a not so I remember to check it out next time I'm physically in the area. Thanks so much for catching this!
portalaventura (2023-05-06 23:56:23+00:00): Olá, verifique as relações a seguir. Elas estão incompletas. Talvez tenha esquecido de completa-las. Se não esqueceu, adicione um fixme.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15593165
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15593166
IgorEliezer (2023-05-07 03:24:51+00:00): Não foi eu quem as fez. Minha edição nestas relações foi puramente de manutenção. Melhor comentar no changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133600099 que as criou.
Fidelis Assis (2024-10-16 17:21:07+00:00): Oi Igor, relação de subdistrito não ficaria melhor com admin_level=10, como recomendado na wiki (9 para distritos e 10 para bairros e subdistritos). Ou há alguma condição específica dessa e da vizinha 15593166 (2º subdistrito)?
IgorEliezer (2024-10-16 21:25:45+00:00): Se a wiki diz que subdistrito é nivel 10, então que seja.
O problema é nos casos como o de Santo André/SP, onde há bairro, subdistrito, distrito.
Um pouco off: oficialmente no país, e o IBGE reconhece, há bairro, subdistrito, distrito. Talvez a comunidade deveria considerar a possibilidade de jogar as reg. metropolitanas (ou outra divisa) para um tipo de boundary especial para elevar os municípios a nível 7, e abrir espaço para subdistrito.
Fidelis Assis (2024-10-16 22:52:21+00:00): OK, vou alterar para nível 10.
Sim, concordo com a renumeração dos admin_level abrindo espaço para permitir distinguir distrito, subdistrito e bairro. Algumas relações hoje mapeados como administrativas (mas que não são) poderiam ser alteradas para statistical ou semelhante.
SherbetS (2023-04-19 01:37:44+00:00): I need to start having two JOSM intances, one for each account smh.
ChehrehBargi (2023-04-21 03:01:33+00:00): @ yashar turanli
You have changed the main name here to Azerbaijani language in change packages 135041207, 134963872 and 134846631. This work of yours is considered vandalism and you ruin the efforts of others. You have also removed the Kurdish language. You are not allowed to put the original name in anything other than Farsi. You are only allowed to add names in Azerbaijani language in a separate tag.
ChehrehBargi (2023-04-21 03:04:39+00:00): @yaşar turanlı
135041207, 134963872 ve 134846631 değişiklik paketlerinde buradaki ana ismi Azerice olarak değiştirmişsiniz. Kürtçe dilini de çıkarmışsınız. Orijinal adı Farsça dışında herhangi bir şeye koymanıza izin verilmez. Ayrı bir etikette yalnızca Azerice isimler eklemenize izin verilir. İşiniz yıkıcı ve bir daha olursa sizi şikayet etmek zorunda kalacağım.
McCio (2023-04-20 20:28:08+00:00): Hi Sitterswald, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
I noticed that this building still appears in the aerial images... Was it demolished? The various activities inside are still there, or should also be removed?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-18 06:10:22+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1163538688
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1163538686

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rainnr (2023-04-18 11:06:33+00:00): Oba obiekty leża na jednej nieruchomości o tym samym adresie. Wygląda na zduplikowany ale taki nie jest, ewentualnie można zostawić adres tylko na budynku głównym.
NorthCrab (2023-04-22 05:27:55+00:00): Na szybki rzut okiem to wydaje się że tylko główny budynek ma adres 11. Może ten caravan ma adres typu 11A?
rainnr (2023-06-11 20:16:39+00:00): Nie ma :) Wiem bo to moi sąsiedzi i bywam tam. Działka ma przypisany jeden adres, czyli 11.
NorthCrab (2023-06-12 00:56:42+00:00): Witaj! Zazwyczaj adres jest przypisany do budynku a nie do działki. W tym przypadku nie wygląda aby caravan współdzielił ten adres. Ale jesteś lokalny więc ty masz ostateczne słowo :D Przez te 2 miesiące już zdążyłem usunąć duplikat adresu, ale droga wolna możesz go przywrócić. Pozdrawiam!
mueschel (2023-04-25 10:21:43+00:00): Hallo,
was heißt das Tag "srac:id"? Referenznummern werden in OSM immer mit einem Tag wie "ref:XYZ" angegeben.