piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-02-28 14:45:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 14 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1050367056 v2 | 14 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179173368
bolsius (2026-02-28 16:43:12+00:00): Ciao Matteo, sono Alessandro del FerraraMappingParty2026. Stiamo cercando la tomba di Carlo Mayr, ma vediamo solo questa, che hai eliminato. Sai qualcosa?
mfortini (2026-02-28 16:53:10+00:00): Io vedo ancora un nodo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13607352976#map=19/44.845237/11.628143
bolsius (2026-03-02 16:06:20+00:00): Confermo! Non so perché ma MapComplete non me lo mostrava. Grazie
eteb3 (2026-05-20 14:38:38+00:00): Hi,

Do you know that this Brompton hire dock is in operation? I've never seen it in use and it appears to be abandoned - I was thinking of taking it out of the map
BarryMyles (2026-05-20 22:31:47+00:00): I did look reasonably carefully at it when I was there. I tried to peer inside to see if there were any bikes. The facility looked reasonably clean, but I don't know enough to confirm its continued availability. If you suspect it is defunct, I think you should remove it.
eteb3 (2026-05-21 06:36:08+00:00): Thanks. I’ll take it out at some point - it’s been in the state you describe for about 5 years!
silversurfer83 (2026-03-01 09:47:33+00:00): Hi there :)

as you touched country borders and a time zone in this edit I don't believe your CS-Comment is sufficent. It explains nothing while still showing up in the feeds of mappers from Spitzbergen to Cape Town.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179173748
Aurimas Fišeras (2026-03-01 10:12:44+00:00): Hi,
Time zone (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16819468/history) – only JOSM validation fix by removing (stray?) wikipedia:ar tag.

Country borders – Osmose validation (https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issues/open?source=6641&item=2110&class=21101) fix – removed name:* tags from boundary ways.
Mashin (2026-02-28 22:00:32+00:00): Hi and thanks for editing OSM!
Just in this case this is not correct. "Park" in OSM is considered as public area with maintained greenery and used for leisure activities.
You can read more about the description here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark

Cheers
rarad74 (2026-02-28 20:19:16+00:00): Salut. Se folosesc diacritice obligatoriu. Setul de imagini Bing este mai vechi  de 10 ani. Foloseste ESRI Standard sau Mapbox.
NeisBot (2026-02-28 15:09:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13607695771 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Photography studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-08 17:33:19+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179543893
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-02-28 15:24:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13607695771 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Photography Studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-08 17:33:20+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179543893
Tatfahren (2026-02-28 21:10:12+00:00): Die Gebäude sind noch in allen aktuellen Luftbildern erkennbar. Damit niemand die ohne Ortskenntnis übers Luftbild einträgt, sollten solche abgerissenen Gebäude stattdessen für einige Jahre mit dem "demolished:" prefix versehen werden. 

Sonst kommt in 2 Wochen jemand der sich freut noch ein Paar fehlende Gebäude gefunden zu haben, und trägt diese erneut ein.
NeisBot (2026-02-28 15:27:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13607695771 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Photography Studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-08 17:33:21+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179543893
woodpeck (2026-03-03 22:54:31+00:00): Dear Oliver Farník, thank you for using a good changeset comment on this changeset; all your previous changesets had useless word salad ("dgfdg" etc.) in the comment field. Because several users have complained about that, and about the fact that you have added non-existent roads to OSM, I have reverted your previous edits. In the future, please always use good changeset comments like you did here, and do not add roads to OSM that are not there (or just being planned).
mueschel (2026-03-01 12:24:57+00:00): Hi,
I found 60 signals with a "railway:signal:minor:state" tag. Some of them also have a "railway:signal:minor:states" tag. Could you check & fix that?
HaPe-CZ (2026-03-02 07:15:31+00:00): Hello, this situation can occur and is correct. "railway:signal:minor:state" is for signals that have a constant speed limit, e.g., 50 km/h ... http://www.osmorm.wz.cz/index.php?a:9:{i:1;i:2;i:2;i:20; i:3;i:2;i:4;i:4;i:5;i:11;i:6;i:2;i:7;i:3;i:8;i:16386;i:9;i:1;}&126096&16384.
Then there is also "railway:signal:minor:states", where the signal is variable... not lit = no speed limit / lit = speed limit (e.g., 60 km/h)... http://www.osmorm.wz.cz/index.php?a:9e:{i:1;i:2;i:2;i:20; i:3;i:2;i:4;i:4;i:5;i:11;i:6;i:2;i:7;i:2;i:8;i:1028;i:9;i:1;}&126096&1024. 
It can also be a combination: http://www.osmorm.wz.cz/index.php?a:11:{i:1;i:2;i:2;i:20;i:3;i:2;i:4;i:4;i:5;i:11;i:6;i:2;i:7;i:2;i:8;i:1028;i:9;i:3;i:10;i:16386;i:11;i:1;}&126096&17408 nebo
http://www.osmorm.wz.cz/index.php?a:11:{i:1;i:2;i:2;i:20;i:3;i:2;i:4;i:4;i:5;i:11;i:6;i:2;i:7;i:2;i:8;i:1025;i:9;i:3;i:10;i:16386;i:11;i:1;}&126096&17408.
HaPe-CZ (2026-03-02 07:19:47+00:00): Of course, an error may occur, but I don't know the coordinates this way.
mueschel (2026-03-02 07:42:02+00:00): "state" was used just once on all the railway signals in the world before your recent edits. 

Mostly key names are either singular or plural and don't change their form depending on if there is one or more values.

It might be better to have a clearer difference between the two keys which is not just an 's'.
HaPe-CZ (2026-03-02 12:20:44+00:00): Yes, I have described the difference sufficiently. It would be good to understand the meaning and usage that I have explained. And also understand static and variable railway signals.
NeisBot (2026-02-28 16:27:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13607820458 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Historical site"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-08 17:33:21+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/179252045
one_half_3544 (2026-03-23 10:04:58+00:00): Точно тут? Перевал Шилун (и одноимённая река) находится восточнее
eggie (2026-02-28 20:18:33+00:00): review_requested 	yes

Lijkt me oke zo,
MVG
eggie
infeeeee (2026-04-17 08:48:50+00:00): Szia!

A plant_nursery az faiskola, nem üzlet. Olvasd el a wikit: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dplant_nursery

Javítottam.
tyfi (2026-02-28 16:51:51+00:00): Previously, the adjacency was approximate, and some overlap was apparent. This was less semantically correct.
Higashimado (2026-02-28 18:03:58+00:00): 您好，感谢您的贡献！OSM Wiki 中有相关的中国标注指南，可以为您在设置标签和名称时作为参考：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E6%A0%87%E6%B3%A8%E6%8C%87%E5%8D%97

相关的一些部分如：
- Name is the name only，name 标签中通常不会含有括号或描述性陈述，别名可以使用 alt_name
- 道路的编号以 ref 标记，名称如“XX线”以 name 标记
- 乡道一般至少标为 highway=tertiary，中国大陆地区的道路通常不宜使用 living_street 等

再次感谢~
Tadasuki (2026-03-01 13:35:55+00:00): 感谢，我会参考标注指南修正我的编辑
Gabriel de Oliveira Aparecido (2026-03-01 13:26:29+00:00): A ponte da Rua Nossa Senhora Aparecida não foi colapsada, mas apenas interditada. Então vou reverter a mudança de colapsada para interditada. E hoje, 01/03 possivelmente será liberada.
no details provided here (2026-02-28 17:39:28+00:00): Hi - these highways are best classified as driveways.  The wiki asks that minor roads are not residential.
StreetSurveyor (2026-02-28 17:29:25+00:00): There is no evidence this is an officially named road. The sign marks the town boundary, not a street name. Please avoid adding or inventing names that are not supported by survey or authoritative data.
TeamDELKO (2026-07-01 09:49:12+00:00): Hello,

Why did you delete the DELKO Garage here ? It is still open :D
Đuro Jiří (2026-07-01 19:24:59+00:00): if I deleted it, it means I didn't see it :-(
TeamDELKO (2026-07-03 13:54:49+00:00): Comment ça vous ne l'avez pas vu ? Vous ne pouvez pas le remettre ? 

On voit ici la fiche : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12625718801/history/17
Đuro Jiří (2026-07-03 14:01:09+00:00): If I didn't see it, it doesn't exist. If you say it still exists, it means I didn't see it properly, and in that case, it resets. So, are you sure it still exists?
TeamDELKO (2026-07-03 14:03:30+00:00): Yes I'm sure. I work for DELKO and it is still open in this building. You can confirm on Google Maps if you wan, just look at "Garage DELKO Trets"
Đuro Jiří (2026-07-03 14:30:39+00:00): Even according to Panoramax I would say that it doesn't exist

https://api.panoramax.xyz/fr/index?s=fp;s2;p305a68d9-622a-4da8-b30d-d0e14046de9f;c66.32/-9.13/30;m17.5/43.449044/5.678444;vt;udefault

but if you work there and say it still exists, then it's back on OSM:-)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4589190001

Google Maps cannot be used!!!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google
TeamDELKO (2026-07-06 06:32:50+00:00): Yes it's because the front door is by the other street "rené cassin" :)

Thank you
Scout Jens (2026-02-28 18:43:13+00:00): den Radweg gibt es schon länger in OSM; warum doppelt eintragen? warum damit Fehler provozieren?
Scout Jens (2026-02-28 18:44:33+00:00): Ich verstehe das von Grundauf nicht. Warst Du überhaupt vor Ort?
Nakaner-repair (2026-03-01 19:46:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179224211 where the changeset comment is: Revert duplication of existing cycleway by user 1893maps
Rainero (2026-03-12 15:26:45+00:00): Revert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179763140
(unzulässige Quelle)
ratrun (2026-03-03 18:24:53+00:00): Hi,
please check your modification on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1234533146#map=18/9.926974/78.149884 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1234533147. This modification (brigde Apollo Sandhippu Maempalam) looks weird and is definitely wrong in the west, as the end-nodes are not connected with another road. Please rework this.
contrapunctus (2026-03-03 19:01:10+00:00): Hey ratrun, thanks for letting me know.

Unfortunately, my modification was mostly to the construction status of the flyover, and not to its geometry. As I'm not familiar with its geometry and am no longer in the city, I'll try to get a local mapper to look at it.
eggie (2026-02-28 18:33:14+00:00): Dag MK,
De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. Spatie verwijderd uit postcode.

MVG
eggie
Scout Jens (2026-02-28 18:49:37+00:00): Den Weg gibt es schon! Achte bitte auch auf die Fehlermeldungen!
Nakaner-repair (2026-03-01 19:46:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179224211 where the changeset comment is: Revert duplication of existing cycleway by user 1893maps
OSM_RogerWilco (2026-04-21 20:05:55+00:00): Moin wiebketru,

benutze für Beschreibungen bitte den Tag description. Der name Tag ist nur für echte Namen gedacht.

Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Viele Grüße
Muokkaaja (2026-04-02 14:53:36+00:00): Tämä ei ole oikea tapa lisätä nimiä ruotsiksi, nimi oli jo puiston alla tagilla name:sv.
Cybermanx (2026-02-28 19:11:11+00:00): su piazza maggiore bisognerebbe fare l'illuminazione di palazzo d'accursio, ma sono 30 lampade (2 per finestra), da ripetere su due piani. San Petronio avrebbe le luci che illuminano i bassorilievi della facciata. di sicuro non lo farò entro stase che finisce il progetto del mese
ivanbranco (2026-02-28 19:22:55+00:00): Per gli elementi ripetuti su diversi piani si può anche utilizzare un solo elemento con repeat_on=*, vedi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:repeat_on
Cybermanx (2026-02-28 19:27:39+00:00): top, grazie mille
farò prossimamente, intanto ho dato luce al centro che mi dava fastidio lasciare incompleto l'obiettivo che mi ero fissato
uprkos (2026-03-07 08:30:23+00:00): Dzięki za ogarnięcie zagospodarowania! Dużo przyjemniej się zwiedza tereny gdzie mapa tak ładnie wygląda.
uprkos (2026-03-07 08:30:43+00:00): Dzięki za ogarnięcie zagospodarowania! Dużo przyjemniej się zwiedza tereny gdzie mapa tak ładnie wygląda.
k2101 (2026-03-07 11:48:59+00:00): Dzięki. Teraz tereny na wschód od Krosna.
Widzę, że też działasz. Będzie mniej uwag w okolicy :)
HantDX (2026-02-28 20:45:52+00:00): Согласно правилам сообщества, тэги name (стандарнтый name, не name:xx) должны заполняться на бел. языке. Насколько я понимаю, это относится и к остановкам общественного транспорта. См. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Belarus:Map_languages
DressyPear4 (2026-07-27 11:58:39+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186452689
DressyPear4 (2026-07-27 12:49:23+00:00): Você pode clicar com botão direito do mouse em um nó e escolher dividir linha, não adicione a tag de ponte em toda via.
Linus W Frische (2026-03-22 14:04:48+00:00): Hi. Please don't use healthcare=hospital for hospital wards. Use a tag like healthcare=department and department=* instead. 

Current tagging is wrong and implies several different hospitals on the grounds.
Frimmer (2026-03-25 20:59:09+00:00): Kære Linus 
Tak for rettelserne!
Giver god mening.
Mvh.
Attila Frimmer
kingkingHK (2026-03-01 03:28:47+00:00): Please note the following:

1. Do not use government maps (or any other copyrighted maps) for editing osm. This is a copyright infringement.
2. Do not delete then recreate an identical object. This makes it difficult for future mappers to check the history. Simply edit the geometry and tags. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
3. If a building is in fact rectangular in real life, please press Q after drawing the building to make it rectangular.
Dundee930 (2026-03-01 09:01:49+00:00): For issue 1, how to identity for using govt map data? Assume I live there, I can use my solid knowledge to edit it.
kingkingHK (2026-03-01 09:51:01+00:00): You entered "map.gov.hk" as a source.
Dundee930 (2026-03-01 10:43:41+00:00): I live in their, the source is from myself and Village Core community, not from Gov. I typed it wrong.
vectorial8192 (2026-03-01 12:09:15+00:00): No judgement from me, but on Internet in general we cannot determine whether you really made a mistake or you are deliberate (Poe's Law).
Dundee930 (2026-03-01 12:19:35+00:00): I think the most controversial part maybe the building / flat number right? 
For the rectangular housing object, it's easy to draw them based on satellite map. 
For the building / flat number, you can only based on local knowledge (resident) or site visit.
Kovoschiz (2026-03-01 13:07:38+00:00): First of all, you can't claim it's a typo. As you have cited it, it must be assumed to be used. This defense won't work regardless of whether it's somehow an honest mistake. 
Here, you deleted rectangular shapes, and redrew them as non-rectangular. That's already wrong. 
Therefore you have caused no net benefit there. You should have only added `addr:*=` to the existing `building=` , not all these changes. You simply raise more suspicion by redrawing them.
Dundee930 (2026-03-01 13:19:40+00:00): For Issue 1, if most of you feel uncomforted, I can delete all my work on house number based on my announced citation. I will not delete the object as I draw them from Satellite Map. I have already indicated "aerial imagery" as one of my source. 

For Issue 2, I will make practice not deleting and creating the existing housing object in the future. 

For issue 3, I have already fixed all my works in rectangular shapes.
jellyfish twink (2026-03-05 19:43:17+00:00): this is not a trunk road
jellyfish twink (2026-03-05 19:44:39+00:00): this is not a trunk road.
peterlilliegeo (2026-03-06 00:19:53+00:00): Whoops, you’re correct! Was trying to update the surface. I’ll fix tonight.
PizzaTreeIsland (2026-02-28 20:08:33+00:00): Hello, 
Thank you for adding all those detials! Please note that natural=tree can only be used on the trees themselves, not on the area that the tree is standing on. I have fixed this already, so don't worry. 
Thanks and happy mapping!
eggie (2026-02-28 20:15:11+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode.

MVG
eggie
Thatsit60 (2026-02-28 20:05:44+00:00): Bitte Langenmattstrasse ebenfalls 30 km/h
captain_slow (2026-02-28 20:12:48+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5185420
eggie (2026-02-28 20:46:11+00:00): Dag A kantoor,
Svp geen name=Advocatenkantoor Burgum laadpaal
Beter operator=.... gebruiken.
De hoofdtag is amenity=charging_station
Mvg
eggie
Tomas Straupis (2026-03-01 13:52:00+00:00): Hello. Please make a very good analysis before importing this data as microsoft building data is extremely bad. You've added a ton of imprecise, incorrect, misaligned data. We will now have to waste time and remove most of it.
wwjd2022 (2026-03-01 16:50:56+00:00): Hello Tomas
Thank you for your message and caring for the map data in your area! I am sorry if I have caused more work than benefit. I usually try to analyse the Rapid Editor data before I accept. I will be even more careful in the future.
Thanks again and keep up to good work!
Tomas Straupis (2026-03-01 16:56:16+00:00): Note: we've seen microsoft building data from the very beginning many years ago, but have yet to see anything useful from them... NONE of that data has ever been accepted (in Lithuania). Maybe in other countries :-) Have a good end of the weekend!
wwjd2022 (2026-03-01 17:04:37+00:00): It is great that Lithuania is mapped in an excellent way. In some other countries and especially other continents the rapid editor data can be helpful, at least that is what I think 🙃. Have a great Sunday evening!
Rainero (2026-03-12 15:17:50+00:00): Revert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179760938
NeisBot (2026-02-28 20:39:22+00:00): Hi michal_tulach, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 86% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 17 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179186480
woodpeck (2026-03-01 18:46:39+00:00): Deletions appear legit, previous building traces were rubbish
NieWnen (2026-02-28 20:45:40+00:00): *EDIT. Istnieje, źle spojrzałem, ale i tak duplikuje ten nadany na budynku.
Comino (2026-03-01 08:29:38+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
Glassman (2026-03-01 16:01:00+00:00): Please correct the tagging of the footway. The access=private is sufficient. Besides, this is in a gated milliitary area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179186709
Glassman (2026-03-01 15:57:52+00:00): I'm not sure what you are trying to accomplish, the steps are already tagged as private so the tag foot=private makes no sense. Please remove.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179186743
d_berger (2026-03-01 12:33:06+00:00): Danke für die Ergänzungen. Beachte bitte, dass der implizierte Default bei Sperren (barrier=*) in der Regel ein 'access=no' ist. Bei grundsätzlich offenen Sperren braucht es ein 'access=yes', hier bei den Wintersperren kombinierbar mit 'access:conditional=no @ ([ZEITRAUM])', wobei dieser bereits an der Passstrasse hinterlegt ist. Andernfalls sperrst du das routing über diese Strassen dauerhaft. HTH
threefoursixninefour (2026-03-01 13:40:06+00:00): Vielen Danke für Ihre Nachrict und dafür, dass Sie mich an den Default für Absperrungen erinnert haben.  Jetzt habe ich access=yes an alles hinzugefügt;  wenn nötig, jemand, der die Winterbeschränkungen besser kennt, kann sie auch hinzufügen.

Ich werde die Änderungen mit OSRM überprüfen, um sicher zu sein, dass das Routing funktioniert.
eggie (2026-02-28 21:33:18+00:00): Hoi..
Svp geen motor_vehicle en motorcycle=no gaan taggen op fietspaden.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2026-02-28 21:38:08+00:00): Wat is bicycle=official op die wandelpaden?
Het komt me allemaal niet echt OSM's voor.

Wat is de status van deze fietspaden.
G13?
Dit zijn de bestaande typen fietspaden en hun bijbehorende tagging:
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway
Bolbuyk (2026-02-28 21:40:26+00:00): Ik heb alleen maar het pad ingetekend tussen begin vlonderpad en het kronkelpad. Die tags zijn niet van mij. Volgens mij is het een mountainbike pad, maar dat is nergens duidelijk aangegeven.
Bolbuyk (2026-02-28 21:42:28+00:00): Ik denk dat het pad in de wijzigingset is terechtgekomen vanwege een connectiepunt, zou dat kunnen?
Bolbuyk (2026-02-28 21:46:21+00:00): Geldt ook voor dat fietspad, ik zie nu wat je bedoeld met overbodige tags.
eggie (2026-02-28 21:48:51+00:00): Inderdaad... 
Zag het, maar ik kijk meer algemeen. Die tags stonden er al op.
Zodra je dan ergens aan zit staat jouw naam erop. 
Die tags zijn echter veel ouder zie ik nu. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=179187360

Wellicht zijn het geen highway=cycleway,
maar highway=path mochten de borden ontbreken. 
In dat geval kan motor_vehicle=no en motorcycle=no uiteraard wel icm met bicycle=yes en foot=yes.

Maar ik ben er niet bekend.. Up to you.. Wellicht wel leuk om uit te zoeken of het paden zijn of fietspaden.

Mapse
eggie