piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
habi (2023-03-10 11:44:40+00:00): Ciao Eluc

In der Schweiz geben wir die Referenznummer ohne "Ref" an, siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/Map_Features#Post_boxes

Gruss und Happy Mapping!
habi
adreamy (2023-08-08 03:46:22+00:00): 실제하지 않는 지물을 매핑하는 것은 '훼손행위'로 간주되어 편집에 제한을 받을 수 있습니다.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:Vandalism
❤️‍🔥 (2023-03-10 09:05:43+00:00): thanks for your edit! I've made some  minors tweaks so that the road & path are categorized as cyclone-damaged. this will prevent the temporary closure from being forgotten about, so someone can eventually mark it as reopen
Elfoniok (2023-03-10 18:27:45+00:00): Well ok for Glenvar road I hope they will reopen it (who knows when) . But the paths are just gone, I dont know if they will be restored in original way. I think we should remove those parts. And If/when new ones will be put in palace we can map them.
❤️‍🔥 (2023-03-11 05:42:09+00:00): yep I agree. I haven't added the paths back, I've just created an empty line which identifies the feature as 'damaged/destroyed by cyclone gabrielle' 
 for example: https://osm.org/way/1153187058 - this is helpful for a variety of reasons, one of which is that these features can be reviewed more regularly, and you can quickly get an overview of everything damanged by the cyclone, e.g. via https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1shu
Elfoniok (2023-03-11 05:44:29+00:00): cool
user_5359 (2023-03-10 08:08:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I delete you SPAM entry with foreign keys. If you need help, your are welcome.
cyton (2023-03-10 11:03:09+00:00): Ist das ein Gebäudeteil der einfach, wohl fälschlicherweise, separat gemappt ist?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133506456
miaux (2023-03-10 11:14:22+00:00): Ja, genau.

Wäre ein Hinweis in dem Fall besser gewesen?
cyton (2023-03-10 11:24:39+00:00): Ja vermutlich, da muss man schon genau hinschauen, um sowas zu erkennen. 

Das geht schnell unter, vor allem bei Changesets von Streetcomplete, da das in verschiedene Changesets aufgeteilt wird, und die alle auf einmal erscheinen.

Notes bleiben als nicht erledigte "Aufgabe" bestehen, bis sich die jemand irgendwann einmal ansieht.

Und meist sind solche Häuser in "Mehrfachausführung" falsch, vor allem hier, wo es Einfamilienhäuser sind.

Da muss man dann mit building:part arbeiten, oder einfach alles vereinen.
cyton (2023-03-10 11:35:46+00:00): https://osm.org/changeset/133514638

vor allem wenn im alkis layer die gebäude als einzelne flächen erscheinen kann man das recht schnell "falsch" mappen, wenn dann noch eine adress-node innerhalb nur einer dieser ringe existiert, weiß streetcomplete nicht was ein haus ist mit adresse und was nicht, also fragt es für alles separat noch einmal.

am besten bei solche berührenden häusern einfach eine note öffnen.
angeben was das jeweils für ein objekt ist, also zb erker, eingang, vordach, balkon, aber auch die anzahl geschosse oder dachform kann man an separaten teilen eintragen.

wenn es eine garage oder gartenhütte ist, kann man das ja gleich als solche eintragen in SC.

siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Simple_3D_Buildings
aber das alles erfordert recht viel mühe, für (subjektiv gesehen) meist wenig mehrwert.
zumindest ist das nicht für routing interessant.

aber es gibt solche darstellungen:
https://osmbuildings.org/?lat=52.62555&lon=13.29568&zoom=19.4&tilt=20&rotation=13
https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=52.6255885&lon=13.2956771&zoom=20&camera.phi=13
Frans S (2023-03-10 08:44:32+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please don't spend time on mapping of traces leading to and ending in farmland (tracks and paths) Focus on through roads. (unclassified)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133506544
Frans S (2023-03-10 11:31:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Despite it is just 1 building you mapped, I have a comment. Please square the rectangular buildings. 
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133506645
EinEngener (2023-03-12 21:19:45+00:00): Hallo RicGer bei diesem Verbesserungssatz sind ein paar Fehler passiert, ganze Straßenabschnitte verlaufen im Längewald und Stohberwald südlich von Hondingen, kann ich die falschen Wege löschen ?
Viele Grüße EinEngener
*abq* (2023-03-13 17:28:54+00:00): Ich glaube besser wäre, den Änderungssatz zu revertieren, irgendwo kommen die Wege ja her.
VG Reiner
*abq* (2023-03-13 17:57:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133506907
*abq* (2023-03-13 17:57:20+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/changeset-revert/96849
pyram (2023-03-13 18:23:22+00:00): Was auch immer da schiefgelaufen ist - ich habe den Änderungssatz komplett auf den vorherigen Stand zurückgesetzt.
EinEngener (2023-03-14 12:17:16+00:00): ok vielen Dank ;)
wille (2023-03-10 11:27:32+00:00): Revertida por vandalismo. Caso continue a fazer edições incorretas em nome, você será denunciado ao Data Working Group e poderá ter sua conta suspensa.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133506932
user_18541240 (2023-03-10 12:16:33+00:00): Olá, Boa tarde ! Conhece o local ? Não vou refazer o que foi desfeito !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133506932
wille (2023-03-10 12:57:51+00:00): Conheço sim. Notícia de 3 dias atrás em que  aparece o nome do viaduto: https://aratuon.com.br/cidade/2023-03-07/acidente-no-viaduto-nelson-dahia-deixa-um-ferido-transito-segue-intenso-na-paralela/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133506932
user_18541240 (2023-03-10 13:19:19+00:00): Bom dia, O viaduto Nelson Dantas é o que fica em Frente ao Macro conforme foto em reportagem  https://globoplay.globo.com/v/5422883/ e não tem nada a ver com a atualização que fiz na via lateral de acesso a paralela ! Reveja o que foi feito por mim ! Você mora na cidade de Salvador ? Conhece ? Quando cometo algum erro eu me conforme e peço desculpas mais sei que nesse caso estou certo ! Faço isso porque além se ser funcionario publico eu também sou motorista por aplicativo e sei que vai me ajudar quando eu for buscar, levar  e deixar os passageiros! As informações de várias ruas estão incorretas atualmente estão incorretas o que prejudica meu trabalho de motorista por aplicativo !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133506932
user_18525827 (2023-03-10 13:38:02+00:00): olá, bom dia, o viaduto tem um nome mais a rua que cruza o viaduto tem outro nome.... Avenidas de Salvador a exemplo da Avenida Orlando Gomes cruza vários viadutos incluindo o principal viaduto da paralela mais o nome que consta no mapa não é do viaduto mais sim da avenida ou rua que passa por ele . Acredito que o senhor o usuário endereço e lugares é quem está certo nesse caso. O usuário wille está infelizmente enganado nesse caso.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133506932
user_18541240 (2023-03-10 13:43:38+00:00): Bom dia Antônio Duarte, pois é assim que eu penso também. Agradeço pelo esclarecimento e orientação!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133506932
wille (2023-03-10 14:00:05+00:00): O Makro não existe mais, virou Atacadão, que está exatamente nesse local. O Uber não utiliza mais os dados do OpenStreetMap. Ele desenvolveu um mapa próprio. Nada do que você faz aqui vai ter efeito no Uber. Passo por esse viaduto pelo menos duas vezes por semana.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133506932
user_18541240 (2023-03-10 14:37:16+00:00): Bom dia, Ainda chomo de Macro e no Uber uso o Google Maps ou Waze como navegador durante as viagens ! Na sua atualização no Vale do Canela você  colocou o nome da via "Ligação Reitor Miguel Calmon - Campo Grande" e não o nome do Viaduto que faz a Ligação! Reveja lá !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133506932
wille (2023-03-10 14:46:37+00:00): No sistema da prefeitura consta o nome que eu coloquei: http://mapeamento.salvador.ba.gov.br/geo/desktop/index.html#on=layer/default;eixos/eixos;scalebar_meters/scalebar_m;orto2016/Ortoimagem_Salvador_2016_2017&loc=0.29858214173896974;-4288300.650309651;-1458668.2679877998

O IBGE também consta o mesmo. O Google Maps está com o nome errado.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133506932
user_18541240 (2023-03-10 15:14:39+00:00): Oi, Boa Tarde, Obrigado por me mostrar o mapeamento mais já conhecia e sei que tem muita coisa desatualizada e incorreta como também em outros aplicativos. Sou morador do Canela a 48 anos e conheço muito bem o bairro além de ter um irmão historiador que trabalha na biblioteca central e me da acesso acervo e ao banco de bados publico além de cruzar várias referencias na internet, dicas de amigos e experiencia como motorista de aplicativo a 6 anos. Quero contribuir mais posso cometer erros assim como você também por isso que a comunicação é importante. Grato pelo dica !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133506932
user_18541240 (2023-03-10 15:26:14+00:00): Infelizmente Wille não tenho como compartilhas  informações como fotos e documentos! Seria bom ter uma opção anexar para comprovar a fonte!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133506932
user_18522818 (2023-03-10 15:36:19+00:00): Boa tarde, Um absurdo! O sistema da prefeitura utiliza o SIRGAS2000 que foi conduzido entre os dias 10 a 19 de maio de 2000. Já tem 22 anos de desatualização. Na minha opinião não serve a muito tempo como referencia. https://www.sirgas.org/pt/sirgas-realizations/sirgas2000/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133506932
user_18541240 (2023-03-10 16:06:38+00:00): Boa tarde, eu já sabia por meu irmão! Se não atrapalha, ajuda !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133506932
SomeoneElse (2023-03-12 15:25:52+00:00): Hello, Andy Townsend from OSM's Data Working Group here.
Can "Endereços e lugares", or one of their "friends"  please provide actual evidence that the "Viaduto Nelson Daiha" name here is not correct?  We've already seen a link from wille, most of which loads for me in Europe, but nothing from the other side (other than https://globoplay.globo.com/v/5422883/ , which does not).
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2023-03-12 15:26:39+00:00): Olá, Andy Townsend do Grupo de Trabalho de Dados da OSM aqui.
Pode "Endereços e lugares", ou um de seus "amigos", fornecer evidências reais de que o nome "Viaduto Nelson Daiha" aqui não está correto? Já vimos um link do wille, a maioria que carrega pra mim na Europa, mas nada do outro lado (além de https://globoplay.globo.com/v/5422883/ , que não carrega).
Atenciosamente,
andy
SomeoneElse (2023-03-12 15:27:51+00:00): One more thing - please use better descriptions of your changes than "Upgrade realizado".  Explain what you changed and why you changed it, and what your source for that change was.
SomeoneElse (2023-03-12 15:28:09+00:00): Mais uma coisa - por favor, use descrições melhores de suas alterações do que "Upgrade realizado". Explique o que você mudou e por que mudou, e qual foi a fonte dessa mudança.
user_18541240 (2023-03-13 00:22:02+00:00): Olá, Boa noite! Obrigado pela informação! vou passar a fazer um breve resumo na descrição e "Explicar o que mudou e por que mudou, e qual foi a fonte dessa mudança"
SomeoneElse (2023-03-14 09:39:40+00:00): For info, I'm currently in communication with the "Endereços e lugares" account asking them to answer questions such as the above, initially via email to the DWG.  They have said many times "My account has been wrongly suspended!" but I'm still waiting for direct answers to the questions that have been asked.
Frans S (2023-03-10 08:43:41+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please don't spend time on mapping of traces leading to and ending in farmland (tracks and paths) Focus on through roads. (unclassified)
(read the paragraph about tracks in the instructions)
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133506945
wkdgs (2023-03-27 13:24:16+00:00): Der Tag "highway=secondary" ist für Landesstraßen. Der Tag "highway=track" war hier richtig.

Bitte informiere dich im OSM-Wiki wie etwas gemappt werden sollte, bevor du etwas änderst:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dsecondary
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133507020
wille (2023-03-10 11:26:10+00:00): Revertida. Nome incorreto em edifício.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133507078
user_18541240 (2023-03-10 12:11:58+00:00): Olá Bom dia! Como pode reverter se não conhece ? Estive no local pessoalmente e procurei me informa ! Estou tentando ajudar atualizando e compartilhando e você está desfazendo! Não vou ficar refazendo o que foi desfeito por você!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133507078
user_18541240 (2023-03-10 12:28:03+00:00): https://www.google.com/maps/place/Edifício+Barbara+Stephanie/@-12.9944589,-38.5179748,21z/data=!4m6!3m5!1s0x7160589841dbf1f:0xf6c268db52d9bd21!8m2!3d-12.9944292!4d-38.5178354!16s%2Fg%2F11twmf1pqc?authuser=9
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133507078
avinet_ua (2023-03-10 14:23:37+00:00): чого ревертиш зміни на території України?
ревертилка чешеться? ок
SekeRob (2023-03-11 11:37:01+00:00): Hi,

what is the meaning of all these overlapping areas of grassland, wood and forest? QA such as OSM Inspector give many red flags. Both the wood and the forest have you as last mapper logged so I assume you are aware.

As for this object, 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2569586

Grassland, highlighted in orange, which shares a border with the wood is not inner, rather to be treated as outer and excluded from the wood outline i.e. you have to cut the wood outline going around the grassland.

cheers
canfe (2023-03-11 11:00:30+00:00): Il phone non è formattato giusto, le cifre vanno staccate.
"Davide" dovrebbe essere un contact phone se ho ben capito.
In wiki è ben spiegato.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133507448
Nicolas Vial (2023-04-02 15:17:07+00:00): potresti indicarmi la pagine del wiki dove sono indicati i formati dei telefoni?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133507448
canfe (2023-04-02 15:46:36+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone
Jan Olieslagers (2023-03-11 09:54:20+00:00): Dear, thanks for your good intentions. I regret having had to revert your change, though: IATA codes are maintained and managed by IATA, and they state that the code QGY is not assigned. Check it out for yourself at https://www.iata.org/en/publications/directories/code-search/?airport.search=QGY
Kindly yours,
itineris (2023-03-11 10:12:59+00:00): Hi,

It's interesting indeed.

Even though the IATA database does not list them, they still use it themselves:
http://www.lhpr.hu/en_EN/home

Airport Codes also lists them: https://airportcodes.aero/qgy

What should we do now?

Greets,
Ákos
Jan Olieslagers (2023-03-11 10:59:30+00:00): In this case it is simple: IATA are the owner of these codes, so their website has authority. Also see private message.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-03-13 14:37:08+00:00): Hvad er way 1153145018 ?

En stream kan jo ikke løbe i cirkler.
pangoSE (2023-06-26 15:53:35+00:00): Tack!
Vi har 384 leder i WD nu. :)
Se https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Hiking_trails/Sweden för statistik om hur många som saknar OSM id.
gscholz (2023-03-25 11:55:29+00:00): Hi  Ferreira8940,
this changeset has destroyed a farmland relation:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-36.41018&lat=-9.86420&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133507682

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-03-01 16:17:25+00:00): Ferreira, voce deletou uma via que havia aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3044840045 Por favor, corrija.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-06-03 23:45:36+00:00): edição revertida.
SekeRob (2023-03-10 08:31:30+00:00): Oops, forgot to save edits in Calabria before moving on to next target. Sorry
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-10 09:00:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10725355176
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333443980

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
jeslop (2023-03-10 10:46:02+00:00): Hola Jesus Millón. OSM no es el lugar adecuado para hacer pruebas y menos aún para publicarlas.
 
Si quieres saber más sobre el proyecto: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_de_principiantes.

Te elimino esta aportación.

Saludos,

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
abrensch (2023-03-17 16:18:41+00:00): Hallo Hamdo97,

ich habe Deinen Änderungssatz zur Sperrung der Brücke bei Hirschhorn revertiert.

Die Sperrung mit detaillierten Zugangs-Infos (Autos gesperrt, Rad/Fuss frei) ist dort schon getagged.

Hat sich was geändert? Ist es jetzt wirklich auch für Fussgänger gesperrt?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
CoyKoi (2023-03-11 09:16:31+00:00): I don't think it really matters - but technically Glenvar Road damage was from the January 27 flooding
❤️‍🔥 (2023-03-14 01:34:42+00:00): thanks, fixed
wkdgs (2023-03-27 13:09:30+00:00): Hallo,

erstmal willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und Danke, dass du dabei hilfst die Karte zu verbessern.

Leider mussten deine Änderungen rückgängig gemacht werden.

Der Tag "barrier=yes" ist nur für phyische Barrieren gedacht und kann keine Baustelle auf einer Straße ersetzen.

Eine Baustelle auf einer Straße kennzeichnet man dadurch, dass mann den "highway=secondary" Tag durch "highway=construction" ersetzt und den Tag "construction=secondary" hinzufügt.

Außerdem ist es immer gut Zusatzinformationen wie geplantes Baustellenende oder letztes Überprüfungsdatum mit Tags wie "note" oder "check_date" hinzufügen.

Im Wiki findest du mehr Infos dazu:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction

Gruß
wkdgs
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133509402
MarinoBM (2023-05-21 23:29:56+00:00): Hola Arturo Francisco Barbero:
Hay una normativa para la clasificación de las carreteras. Según el Catálogo de Carreteras de Castilla y León la N-232 y la N-234 pertenecen a la red Complementaria Preferente, por lo que las corresponde la clasificación de secundary y las has cambiado a primary de forma arbitraria.
Revisa tus ediciones.
Un saludo.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Normalizaci%C3%B3n_f%C3%ADsica#Castilla_y_Le%C3%B3n
MarinoBM (2023-05-21 23:33:18+00:00): Rectifico la referencia de carreteras. Son la SG-232 y SG-234.
eggie (2023-03-10 09:53:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-03-10 10:01:33+00:00): Dag VR..
Je vraagt feedback.. 
De kade heb ik iets aangepast aan de huidige situatie. De weg heb ik losgemaakt van de kustlijn. 
Wanneer de weg nog niet bestaat dan kun je 'm het beste als highway=proposed  proposed=service toevoegen. 
Zodra er aan gewerkt wordt proposed vervangen door construction. Ik heb nu de weg laten uitkomen bij de steiger. 
MVG
eggie
euroPathfinder (2023-03-10 18:47:11+00:00): Hey Lutscher1999,
Ich habe noch einige kleine Anpassungen an Deinem CS gemacht. Insbesondere den Kreisel rund gemacht und aus den beiden Ein- und Ausfahrten eine gemacht.

Viele Grüße und ein schönes Wochenende
euroPathfinder
eggie (2023-03-10 10:08:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback... Maar waarom de weg dan optaggen van busway naar highway=construction?
Dat is een weg in onderhoud voor lange tijd??? 
Ook heb je hiermee de routerelaties van de parkshuttles onderbroken.

Een highway=busway is al per default afgesloten voor ander verkeer. 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133510579

Het lijkt me beter dat ik voorlopig je bijdrage terugdraai...ook omdat je in je commentaar niet aangeeft waarom je een opgebroken weg tagt. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-03-10 10:09:21+00:00): De situatie zoas te zien is op de OPVN karte
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133510579#map=16/51.9150/4.5391&layers=O
eggie (2023-03-10 10:14:39+00:00): reverted by changeset #133512287 due to wrong interpretation highway=busway..

A busway will nor render at the mapnik. 

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2023-03-10 10:03:23+00:00): Tip  Het beste kun je pdok actueel als achtergrond zetten. BING is vaak verouderd en ligt er soms naast.

MVG
eggie
SekeRob (2023-03-17 18:18:27+00:00): Hi,

OSM Inspector flagged that you've mapped a cycleway with a veloroute relation starting at the roundabout on top of a road, same day. Cant' do that, only 1 way allowed in one place at the time. Since the road is tagged with no cycleway, I think the cycleway has to go and the veloroute relation transferred to the appropriate street sections.

let me know if you need assistance, 

ciao
skyper (2023-03-11 13:49:51+00:00): Hallo RicGer,
iD ist leider mit äußerster Vorsicht zu genießen. Insbesondere was die Fehlerwarnungen und ÖVP-Relationen angeht.
Wie kommst Du darauf, dass folgende Knoten Furten darstellen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10725426755
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10725426754
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10725426752
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10725426758
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1432229488
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10725426757
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10725426756
Laut dem Hintergrund Maps4BW (sehr empfehlenswert nicht nur für Gebäude) sind da Tunnel (Rohrdurchflüsse) bzw. Brücken.
`FIXME` (in Großbuchstaben) ist nicht veraltet, auch wenn iD das behauptet.
Zusätzlich wirbelt iD die Mitglieder von PTv2-Relationen mit Schleifen durcheinander, wenn irgendwo auf der Strecke ein Weg geteilt wird. Hier waren es jetzt zehn Relationen der Linien 113 und 261, welche nun Lücken aufweisen, u.a. https://osm.org/relation/12544709.
Aus diesen und anderen Gründen rate ich für Relation und fürs Aufteilen von Wegen besser JOSM zu verwenden.

Schaust Du Dir das bitte noch mal an und korrigierst die Fehler?

Viele Grüße,
skyper