piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
emersonveenstra (2024-07-01 10:55:32+00:00): Hi there,

Could you please fix the opening_hours to be conforming to the syntax shown in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours? Thanks!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-07-17 14:21:07+00:00): deleted
d3mol3k (2024-07-01 19:18:29+00:00): co miała na celu ta zamiana wprowadzająca nowy tor traamwajowy w budowie obok istniejącego toru w budowie? - teraz mamy 3 tory w budowie na tym odcinku.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-07-02 07:48:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/niewiembttrt/blocks - tu chyba można śmiało cofać jak olewał dotychczasowe prośby
d3mol3k (2024-07-02 09:35:01+00:00): zobaczymy - dam autorowi chwilkę - na obecny czas naniosłem aktualizację do poruszania sie po drodze jako drogi do użytku dla dojazdu do posesji bo tak jest to oznakowane i tak się też tędy poruszam - postaram się w miarę aktualizować zmiany w tym rejonie - resztę zmienię ewentualnie w weekend bo to akurat na się przeżyć. No i jak napisałem odezwie sie poprawi będzie super bo chodzi o współpracę a nie wojnę
d3mol3k (2024-07-02 22:00:53+00:00): zero kontaktu - usunąłem
carteD (2024-06-29 08:20:25+00:00): Rectification : il s'agit d'une voie verte, d'où l'attribut "path" que j'ai utilisé.
mcliquid (2024-06-29 11:30:56+00:00): Dieses Duplikat wurde hier entfernt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153328102
DonKult (2024-06-30 10:30:28+00:00): Hi,
In changeset 11985628766 ~14 days ago the restaurant was (re)added as a point. Now this one adds it (also) to the "garden" in front of it – was this intended or an accident due to old map data?

Perhaps the two data points can be merged and extended e.g. with "outdoor_seating" (I suppose that is the garden area – I was never there so far)?
Steffen-OSMapper (2024-06-30 11:42:30+00:00): it was due to old map data.
Agreed to merge and keep website and name Waldrausch
habi (2024-06-30 05:07:23+00:00): Ciao Jar
Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.
Die Arztpraxis, die du hier hinzugefügt hast, ist ziemlich sicher nicht auf dem Trottoir und hat wohl einen Namen und weitere Daten.
Hast du noch mehr Informationen dazu?
Gruss aus Bern,
Habi
habi (2024-07-25 14:03:35+00:00): Mit etwas Suchmaschinen-Fu fand ich https://hausarztpraxis-worb.ch/
Ich habe den POI mal dementsprechend ergänzt.

Gruss aus Bern, habi
SomeoneElse (2024-08-26 13:55:33+00:00): Hello,
What source did you use for your edit to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5216237925/history ?
Best Regards,
Andy
univalence (2024-08-26 16:16:51+00:00): hi Andy - as far as I remember, I mostly based it on the wikidata item and a quick google search. however obviously something must have gone wrong since the Wikidata item represents a castle, I probably misread it and thought it was some object of larger area  in which case the edit would have made sense. sorry!
SomeoneElse (2024-09-08 14:31:56+00:00): What was the source of the wikidata item?  It just looks like bot-created garbage: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q24661403&action=history .
The locality in OSM is also rubbish; it looks like the source is OS OpenData and it's actually the name of the adjacent farm, not a separate locality.
The alleged castle site (which "people on the Internet" claim probably isn't one) is apparently what OSM has as "Flat Cop" to the north.
SomeoneElse (2024-09-08 14:36:10+00:00): Edited at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156354917 .
Udarian (2024-07-02 06:09:07+00:00): Why did you remove that this is an island, it certainly looks like and island
Allison P (2024-06-30 03:58:58+00:00): It's not. Someone used the wrong tag.
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-01 12:20:44+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153409764
limes11 (2024-06-29 11:42:09+00:00): Moin, 

du hast jetzt zwei Rathäuser hinzugefügt. Wie ist das gemeint ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1297326854 hat auch kein building-tag. Das wird doch kein Rathaus ohne Dach sein ?!

Viele Grüße
bernward1 (2024-06-29 21:23:01+00:00): Neben dem alten Hotelgebäude, in dem ein Teil der Verbandsgemeindeverwaltung untergebracht ist haben sie ein zweites einstöckiges Gebäude erstellt. Natürlich mit Dach .-) 
Aber einen anderen Punkt, an dem ich nicht so genau weiß wie man ihn mapped. Die Bushaltestelle. Ansich ist der Platz davor ein Wendeplatz für den Bus. Mehr Platz ist da nicht. Jetzt sieht das so aus, als ob da ein Weg bis zum Wendekreis geht. Ist das Ok ?
limes11 (2024-06-29 22:50:18+00:00): Ja, du hast einen Weg bis zum Wendekreis eingezeichnet. Wenn der Bus direkt an der Bushaltestelle wendet, würde ich den Weg und den Wendekreis entfernen. Generell, selbst wenn noch ein paar Meter weiterfährt, könnte man den way aus der Busroute herausnehmen.
EneaSuper (2024-06-29 15:01:14+00:00): Ciao Lorenzo Zucca, ottimo lavoro davvero, ma desideravo avere alcune delucidazioni e chiederti qualcosina in merito a questo changeset:

Siccome, probabilmente (dato che la memoria mi inganna un po') potrei essere stato io a denominare i quartieri pierriesi mi chiedevo se c'era modo di mappare in maniera ancora più precisa i seguenti:

- San Giuseppe, Santa Teresa e Parteolla;
- Monteleone e Santa Rosalia
- Terramàini e Is Bingias

Te lo chiedo perché mi pare strano che un quartiere abbia tutte queste denominazioni, e che le stesse non si confondano tra old_name, official_name e alt/local_name. Per non parlare dei confini degli stessi poi, che andrebbero suddivisi ulteriormente a questo punto...

La questione è un po' complessa, ma mi piacerebbe affrontarla. Ciao e buon lavoro!
Lorenzo Zucca (2024-06-29 15:47:58+00:00): Ciao Enea! Sì ho preso le denominazioni dalla statistica ufficiale del comune di Cagliari, il quale però non specifica esattamente le divisioni dei "macro-quartieri" (es. S. Giuseppe-S. Teresa-Parteolla)
Unica eccezione l'ho fatta per Is Campus: difatti la denominazione ufficiale sarebbe "Is Campus-Is Corrias" ma essendo is Corrias ben identificato e parte anche del comune di Selargius, ho mantenuto la divisione
Potrei vedere se il portale della regione SardegnaMappe mi dice qualcosa di più!
Grazie per il commento e buon lavoro a te
aceman444 (2024-08-08 21:12:39+00:00): Preco by to mal byt nudzovy vychod? Ak je, viete zistit kde je hlavny vchod?
DaanLT (2024-06-29 10:36:38+00:00): Labas, pasikartosiu, kai žymi landuse (residential, miškai, pievos ir panašiai) - neklijuok jų prie kelių ir takelių, nes paskui labai daug darbo būna norint pajudinti kelius ar landuse atskirai vienas nuo kito. Ačiū
NeisBot (2024-06-29 11:48:25+00:00): Hi cosmog, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1044430977

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
user_8655426 (2024-06-29 12:16:40+00:00): cosmogさん、こんにちは。OpenStreetMap (OSM) へようこそ。
OSM は現実の世界に存在する地物をマッピングし、正確で最新の地図をつくっていくプロジェクトです。(real and current) また、OSMの地図データはゲームだけでなく、さまざまなアプリやウェブサイトなどで使用されています。

OSMに架空の地物を追加したり、既存のデータを実際とは異なるものに変更したりしないでください。よろしくお願いします。(事実と異なる不正な編集を行ったユーザーは、ブロックされる可能性があります。)

・「ようこそ！」
https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome

・JA:破壊行為
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:破壊行為

・新規マッパーに、コミュニティメンバーからお願いしたいこと
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2018/06/12/tips-pokemon-go-2/?lang=ja

---

・JA:初心者ガイド
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:初心者ガイド

・learnOSM (ビギナーズガイド)
https://learnosm.org/ja/beginner/

・JA:Map Features (地物)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Map_Features

・JA:変更セットの良いコメント
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:変更セットの良いコメント
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153325660
user_8655426 (2024-06-29 13:13:01+00:00): Reverted.  (vandalism)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153331704
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153325660
GanderPL (2024-06-29 16:28:14+00:00): https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=153326364
GanderPL (2024-06-29 16:30:53+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=153326364
Sandal man (2024-07-18 19:01:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1297333985#map=17/38.13558/-0.89307
Hola, creo que olvidaste etiquetar la carretera.
Saludos Sandalman
Pikse (2024-09-27 11:36:44+00:00): Please avoid adding street names based on names of adjacent streets. This particular road has no name. It is not part of Kooli tänav, see https://xgis.maaamet.ee/adsavalik/LP00023183.
Pikse (2024-09-27 11:43:17+00:00): Sorry, I now notice you didn't add this name initially. Another user added it and you only split the road into parts.
Pikse (2024-09-27 11:45:36+00:00): Again, sorry. I wanted to post last comment to another changeset. Here the road name was added in this particular changeset.
Darkpoint (2024-09-30 20:42:39+00:00): Noted, I took a look at my edit history to search for similar mistakes and noticed that you have fixed all discrepancies. Thank you.
felipeeugenio (2024-06-29 12:55:37+00:00): Hola Diego. Por favor cuidao los tildes (Jardín)
y no usar contracciones por favor. En un medio digital no tiene mucho sentido ahorrar estacio (Esc. Esp.)

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153326975
mcliquid (2024-06-29 11:45:51+00:00): Thanks!
lakedistrict (2024-06-29 21:14:46+00:00): Looks good. Lancaster city centre will probably end up being micromapped with all the pavements added, so it will eventually all be joined up! You could just extend it to meet Peter Street for now, add footway=sidewalk, and delete the fixme :)
Herman Lee (2024-06-30 17:01:20+00:00): The tag of "name" should present in local language. This changeset has been reverted in changeset 153377626.
SomeoneElse (2024-07-08 14:36:05+00:00): What source did you use for this edit?  It surely wasn't just "Bing Maps Aerial", which your changeset tags suggest.
Igor Bubelov (2024-07-08 14:49:13+00:00): I didn't add bing maps aerial as a source, it was probably done by osm web editor automatically. I just changed the place type tag since the old one appeared to be discouraged in the wiki. Do you mean the data source for the place itself? It's better to ask changeset #1 author, I didn't survey this place, I just assumed the original data is correct
SomeoneElse (2024-07-08 15:17:38+00:00): You must not perform tagfiddling like this without following https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct .
leisure=indoor_play is a widely used documented tag https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/leisure=indoor_play#overview and is widely supported by external projects https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/leisure=indoor_play#projects .  I'll revert this change.
MapManMapManMapMapMapManMan (2024-06-29 12:43:15+00:00): Looks like it worked :)
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-29 11:20:36+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12020110350

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-12 17:35:50+00:00): It's best practice to split ways where street names are likely to change instead of combining blocks across different streets into one segment.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153327979
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2025-08-05 16:46:24+00:00): Hi, Baloo Uriza,

My name is Yuliya, and I am the Quality Control Lead on the OSM team at Lyft.
Thank you for this note. It makes sense as your approach takes into account potential future splits. We will consider it. Thank you so much.

Best regards, Yuliya
Leo Slager (2024-06-29 22:28:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
科技骏马 (2024-06-30 09:33:58+00:00): landuse不建议画成点，而且这里已经有landuse了(way:680671287)。place一般才画成点。
kingrose (2024-06-30 09:37:24+00:00): 好的，多谢指导。
arjunaraoc (2024-07-02 07:24:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). OSM policy is to use full name and not abbreviated names. I have updated your edit vide https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153441187 . Check more info at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(do_not)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153329474
nevw (2024-06-29 12:27:34+00:00): Is the Magpie Trail relation correct?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2948297#map=14/-37.8179/145.4002
It appears to be made of two crossing trails.
nevw (2024-06-29 22:27:03+00:00): I expect the Magpie Trail relation is ok. It seems to have 3 options to join or exit it at the northern end.
nevw (2024-06-29 22:30:34+00:00): Regarding Yabung 
...another curiosity is this section which also carries the Yabung name
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1110690514#map=18/-37.81434/145.40071 and a small section that it joins https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80398218
The highway tag has been removed so it may no longer be used.
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-13 21:36:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 178522771 where the changeset comment is: remove SEO edits
Hunte (2024-06-30 08:12:00+00:00): Moin,

Das gehört wohl kaum in OSM.
Desweiteren ist der private Müllplatz von Combi Privat und eingezäunt.
Nearby0051 (2024-07-06 22:13:41+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153641252
Dimitar155 (2024-06-29 12:30:21+00:00): Долна Невля*
mavl (2024-06-29 14:19:00+00:00): Здравствуйте. Просто для информации. В этом пакете правок тег crossing:barrier=full заменяется на тег crossing:barrier=half.  
  
Возможно, это правильно. Это зависит от трактовки значения слов. Шлагбаум (опускается на переезде сверху) по-английски barrier. Но это слово также обозначает барьер (в том числе автоматический заградительный барьер, который поднимается сверху). Документация по этому тегу неполна.  
  
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1884085627/history  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:barrier?uselang=en  
  
Если под этим тегом понимать только шлагбаум, то правильно, как сделали вы (вполовину дороги - half).  
Если под этим тегом понимать любой барьер, то правильно будет, как было раньше (во всю ширину дороги - full).
user_20909876 (2024-07-01 07:40:01+00:00): Спасибо, откатил. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153398267

Там шлагбаум наполовину, но снизу есть барьер, который поднимается на всю ширину. Вернул full, пожалуй, это более правильно
mavl (2024-11-13 06:16:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159077163 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
sbre (2024-06-29 14:19:35+00:00): Hi, I can confirm by survey (~1 month ago) that this place still exists and is active. I guess it just doesn't have much of an online presence.
eisa01 (2024-06-29 14:45:41+00:00): Thanks, I added back, and set check_date
sbre (2024-06-29 14:48:53+00:00): Good work with the camping sites, BTW, many very outdates ones out there.
czubi (2024-12-18 10:02:07+00:00): Hallo, du hast die Straße von "Am Windberg" in "Windberg" umbenannt, die Adressen an den Gebäuden haben aber noch "Am Windberg". kannst du sagen welche die aktuelle Straßenbezeichnung ist, dann würde ich das gerne anpassen. Oder du .
czubi (2024-12-18 10:03:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1274544499
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1274544500
Navajoa (2024-12-19 03:51:39+00:00): Hallo,

"Windberg" ist korrekt.  Ich habe eien Bekannten, der hat dort ein Häuschen. Und der sagt, "Windberg" ist offiziell korrekt.
Dann müssten alle Straßenbezeichnen bitte auf "Windberg" angepasst werden.

Viele Grüße und Danke für's Nachfragen,
Navajoa
czubi (2024-12-20 14:18:15+00:00): erl.
Navajoa (2024-12-20 14:36:07+00:00): DANKE! :)
jeslop (2024-06-29 14:28:04+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153334629
jeslop (2024-06-29 14:30:48+00:00): Hola Víctor, gracias por unirte a OSM. El mapa no es un lugar para hacer pruebas particulares, he revertido el conjunto de cambios. Si quieres saber algo más sobre como iniciarte:
https://learnosm.org/es/
o 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:P%C3%A1gina_principal

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Victor Torre (2024-06-29 16:00:07+00:00): Si disculpa no había entendido la herramienta.
FUZZY_42 (2024-07-01 21:57:00+00:00): Once more remap Registon ko'chasi between Universitet bulvari and Islom Karimov bog'i as a single carriageway; there is no physical separation on this portion.
CRCulver (2024-07-02 14:26:13+00:00): Did you make a mistake? There is no text from you here, only my quoted changeset comment.
FUZZY_42 (2024-07-04 14:52:44+00:00): There is no such rule in the cartography of Uzbekistan.
CRCulver (2024-07-08 06:23:12+00:00): This is a standard found across the world, and there is no need for Uzbekistan to be different.
Meinew (2024-06-29 15:38:18+00:00): Checked imagery by going at the place
whb_revert (2024-06-29 14:07:26+00:00): This changeset reverts changeset 153131819, 153131888, 153131981, 153142565.
SammysHP (2024-06-29 15:16:08+00:00): Hier hast du die gesamte Anlage als Parzelle 226 eingetragen. Ich kümmere mich um die Korrektur.
H a r a l d 1948 (2024-06-29 17:18:29+00:00): Danke ...!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-06-30 20:52:56+00:00): duplicate
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153334296
madbob (2025-05-03 20:23:23+00:00): Ciao.
Proprio oggi sono passato per un breve tratto di questo percorso - incluso nella relazione 042 (13715783) - e ho trovato che il tratto che va da 45.03289933/7.78182871 a 45.03163288/7.78472385 (poche decine di metri, in verità) è tecnicamente inagibile: è cintato in modo molto blando con paletti e cordini, e la strada si perde nel campo adiacente. Direi che qualcuno ha ben pensato di allargare il pascolo...
Non posso rimuovere quel tratto di strada essendo appunto incluso nella relazione, ed essendo un sentiero CAI evito di manipolarlo, ma almeno lo segnalo per prevedere una qualche deviazione.
Jrachi (2025-05-04 09:31:32+00:00): Grazie della segnalazione.
Ho inoltrato il problema alla SOSEC Piemonte.

Ivo
h0rr0rrdrag0n (2024-06-30 09:57:22+00:00): Too big changeset rectangle (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets). 

Changes only in Alaska, but the changeset rectangle extends to the entire northern hemisphere.
This wrongly big rectangle triggers a lot of personal filters on OSMcha. For example, my filter for one small district of Saint-Petersburg was triggered by this change (where obviously nothing changed by this changeset).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153334531
sbre (2024-06-30 14:22:50+00:00): Alaska is in both hemispheres, nothing to worry about.
somix (2024-06-29 17:18:16+00:00): Здравствуйте, здесь писать "Детская площадка" не надо.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#%D0%98%D0%BC%D1%8F_%E2%80%93_%D1%8D%D1%82%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B8_%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE
Supaplex (2024-07-15 04:47:08+00:00): 請問汐科町真的存在嗎？汐止東方科學園區是新進的地標，應該不會有日式的街盯名稱。查閱國土測繪中心地圖也並沒有該地址存在
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153335156
ma1ist4ir3 (2024-06-29 14:48:45+00:00): https://www.mbta.com/projects/commuter-rail-safety-and-resiliency-program#phase1
rskedgell (2024-07-24 10:35:27+00:00): Thanks for reverting this. I'm trying to exterminate the rest of the damaging edits by @MKBE_

They've made some edits which are probably harmless geometry changes like minor realignments, so it'll take a while.

This may give you an idea of the quality of their editing https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions-info?uid=21272584

Current mood re their edits: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCbfMkh940Q
Nathan_A_RF (2024-07-24 21:18:06+00:00): Thank you for going through these. I thought it disruptive.
whb_revert (2024-06-29 15:08:24+00:00): This changeset reverts changeset 153072285, 153072477, 153072533, 153072822, 153073064, 153073928, 153076218, 153076389, 153125018, 153131664.
itineris (2025-03-07 07:29:34+00:00): Szia!

A "Föngyöskert Gyógyító Völgy"-be felvett "Barlang" mennyire valódi barlang (az Országos Barlangnyilvántartásban nem szerepel), és mennyire inkább pince, barlanglakás, műbarlang, vagy vízszintes táró?

Üdv:
Ákos
Barretina (importacions) (2024-06-29 17:55:19+00:00): Looks like the changeset has been automatically closed while the partial object upload was interrupted due to rate limiting, thus breaking data integrity (namely merging the imported data with former buildings).

Tomorrow I will proceed with a revert and I won't attempt the import again until my account has been rate unlimited.
Barretina (2024-06-30 07:16:14+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153357277
Projjal (2024-07-01 18:25:22+00:00): I got lazy to write the detailed changeset description. Apologizes.
literan (2024-06-30 10:29:44+00:00): тег name - для названий (имен собственных). Если названия нет, не надо заполнять его описаниями. Выберите пункт "Нет названия"
scarapella (2024-10-12 20:35:33+00:00): Thank you for your contribution to osm kisslstvan.  Unfortunately it looks like you used an older (pre-2023) allgash wilderness waterway paper map to place the campsites.  This map (and the current one in fact) has several campsites located incorrectly. Additionally since the publication of this campsite one of the campsites (East Twin Brook) was moved radically. 

I placed the campsites you created more or less at the right place. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157812286#map=10/46.6828/-69.2349

Additionally I removed any duplicate elements I found (e.g. there were two long lake damp campsites in different locations.)

-scarapella
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-29 16:18:08+00:00): #vadalismus
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-29 16:21:36+00:00): Can someone pls revert? Thx
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-29 18:33:47+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153343601
marczoutendijk (2024-06-29 19:33:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16324


Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-29 16:18:52+00:00): #vandalismus
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-29 16:21:53+00:00): Can someone pls revert? Thx
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-29 18:34:06+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153343618
marczoutendijk (2024-06-29 19:33:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16324


Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
gurglypipe (2024-06-29 21:43:31+00:00): Heya, just as a quick suggestion, in case you’ve not come across it before: when out surveying shops, you might want to try using https://streetcomplete.app/, it makes it easy to update shop details. Only works on Android, not iPhone, though.
Wildcat77 (2024-06-30 07:26:12+00:00): Hi, Thanks for the suggestion. Sadly as you say it only works on Android so not for me. I'll have to do it the harder way.
Kovoschiz (2024-06-30 03:51:42+00:00): Please use descriptive upload comments, not something unrelated to the main topic as "roads"