piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gaung Tebono (2026-03-20 08:14:58+00:00): Khusus jalan provinsi ditandai dengan nomor jalan/no referensi sedangkan jalan kabupaten atau secondary highway meskipun termasuk golongan jalur arteri primer/utama yang terbilang tingkat kepentingannya/urgensi tinggi tetap memakai tag "highway=primary" tetapi tidak ada nomor referensi nya. Disini kesimpulan nya adalah perbedaan nya cuma ada pada nomer referensi nya kalau jalan kabupaten tingkat kepentingan tinggi (bukan jalan alternatif) dan jalan provinsi.

Salam 🙏🏻
AlphaStars (2026-03-21 04:22:28+00:00): Untuk kewenangan dalam menetapkan status jalan nasional sepenuhnya berada di tangan Kemen PU (dulu PUPR), bukan Kemenhub (dalam hal ini Ditjen Perhub Darat). Ditjen hanya menetapkan nomor rute dalam keputusannya, sementara PU menetapkan status jalan nasional dengan kode referensinya sendiri. Ketetapan terbaru saat ini adalah "Keputusan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Nomor 1688/KPTS/M/2022 tentang Penetapan Ruas Jalan Menurut Statusnya sebagai Jalan Nasional" yang menjadi konsideran dari Keputusan Gubernur tersebut. Terima kasih.

Link file:
https://binamarga.pu.go.id/index.php/peraturan/detail/keputusan-menteri-pupr-nomor-430kptsm2022-tentang-penetapan-ruas-jalan-menurut-statusnya-sebagai-jalan-nasional
RusticCloud3325 (2026-03-23 11:48:05+00:00): Kalau menurut dokumen yang diberikan saudara Gaung Tebono, saya lihat-lihat di lampirannya (halaman 33/50 dokumen), jalan yang diedit di sini ditampilkan ke peta sebagai JALAN NASIONAL. Dokumen yang saya maksud adalah SK Gubernur Jatim No. 100.3.3.1/202/013/2025. Menurut kesimpulan saya, ruas ini memang merupakan jalan nasional. Mungkin saudara-saudara bisa mengecek ke lapangan, apakah garis marka tengah jalannya berwarna kuning atau putih.
Bienson (2026-03-20 01:14:25+00:00): Keine Fußgängerzone

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=pedestrian
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-22 08:21:55+00:00): das heißt, der Flächentag in Syburg wurde von wem auch immer falsch angelegt?
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
eggie (2026-03-19 17:00:11+00:00): Dag Liskwartier,
Is het niet gewoon access=private.. zowel op de poort als op het wegdeel.
Mvg
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
eggie (2026-03-24 09:30:49+00:00): Hoi  osmenl,

Het is niet gebruikelijk om name=A27 te gebruiken op snelwegen.
ref= ..  wordt wel toegepast.
Zou je nog even willen kijken?

MVG
eggie
JeroenvanderGun (2026-04-01 18:41:44+00:00): ref=A27 klopt ook niet, want administratief gezien is dit geen afrit van de A27 maar een toerit naar de busbaan. Ik heb noname=yes en noref=yes toegevoegd.
eggie (2026-04-01 18:46:13+00:00): Jeroen.. thx
Bienson (2026-03-20 01:15:42+00:00): Keine Fußgängerzone
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-22 08:44:28+00:00): zurückgesetzt.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 09:23:33+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, possibly sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184127560

https://osm.org/changeset/184127560
NeisBot (2026-03-19 17:24:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13630915106 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Plumbing service"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-27 17:33:28+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180514387
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
Langlaeufer (2026-03-20 11:08:38+00:00): Der Fußweg ist doch nicht unterirdisch. Wieso layer=-1?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180122005
Langlaeufer (2026-03-20 11:20:07+00:00): Behoben, Dach bekommt layer=1
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180122005
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
iandees (2026-03-19 18:00:41+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3057802210 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180123721, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
IvaKraljić (2026-03-20 21:57:44+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180179583#map=19/42.262167/-71.463326. #OptimoRoute
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
IvaKraljić (2026-03-20 22:02:37+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180179725. #OptimoRoute
ItaliA1delSole (2026-03-19 17:33:36+00:00): link 1: mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.03466595868281&lng=9.131045017373594&z=17.53270912002613&pKey=1437673370103026&focus=photo&x=0.5373231578286118&y=0.6807852222059431&zoom=2.9940527523956786
ItaliA1delSole (2026-03-19 17:34:06+00:00): link 2: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.017510000000016&lng=9.132443800000033&z=18.36026451865086&pKey=1259520746220045&focus=photo&x=0.08948381570927061&y=0.4628983911307271&zoom=3
rajdhani (2026-03-22 10:43:00+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180242787
whitepanda (2026-03-26 09:10:37+00:00): Revert of 180096560
Frans S (2026-03-25 13:42:08+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You mapped an already mapped residential area for the 2nd time.
It was already mapped back in 2022 as a part of a city. You should have seen it.
Anyhow, i removed your mappings. (3 areas)
Best regards
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Sylabowy Kot (2026-03-19 18:09:01+00:00): Brakowało też jednego budyneczku.
dav23r (2026-05-21 16:28:11+00:00): Follow up with addresses in changeset 182984400
LordGarySugar (2026-03-30 04:06:55+00:00): Are there really monoral railway tracks here? What did you intend to represent with them?
JonnyW03 (2026-04-15 15:03:00+00:00): Hi, as far as I can tell this is the best tag to describe the rails present. They're single rails set into the ground that a shelter would have moved along. It's the same tag that many other space and missile servicing shelters all use.
LordGarySugar (2026-04-20 02:07:07+00:00): Ok, that makes sense, it just looked a bit strange. I would suggest tagging them disused:railway=monorail or abandoned:railway=monoral (depending on condition) seeing as they are no longer in service.
pitfire (2026-04-05 09:50:18+00:00): Hallo florian1984,

höfliche Frage, was ist Deine Intuition bei der Erstellung
des Gebäudes Gottfried-Corbach-Straße 1/Bladersbacher Straße 86 & 86a.
Die letzte Version beinhaltet 15 building:part aber es fehlt der erforderliche
Gesamtumriss.
Zu beachten ist, dass mit building:part=* getaggte Flächen immer zu einer umschließenden Fläche mit dem Attribut building=* gehören, die den Umriss des gesamten Gebäudes darstellt (geschlossene Linie oder Multipolygon).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building:part

VG pitfire
ilias_ (2026-04-01 00:22:26+00:00): Cash Plus et non pas Cach Plus stp n3am a sidi
AndyB_66 (2026-03-22 19:10:19+00:00): Odcinek ulic Moniuszki i Nowowiejskiej w obrębie zabudowy Tomaszowa powinien być "residential".
Grzegorz_Kujawa (2026-03-22 20:35:02+00:00): To jest droga przelotowa do Rabinówki i uczestniczy w sieci połączeń, więc wg wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway=unclassified oraz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dresidential ja bym tam pozostawił "unclassified". Co więcej, obniżyłbym odcinek Moniuszki (a nawet Wywolenia) do Lwowskiej do drogi "unclassified".
Co o tym sądzisz?
AndyB_66 (2026-03-22 20:43:19+00:00): Masz rację - zasugerowałem się tym, że pozostały odcinek ul Moniuszki (do Lwowskiej) jest "grubszy" - a tam jest "tertiary" i powinno być "unclassified", jak piszesz. Wyzwolenia i Poniatowskiego też bym zmienił na "unclassified".
Grzegorz_Kujawa (2026-03-22 20:51:27+00:00): Słusznie, Poniatowskiego też. Jak chcesz i masz możliwość do pozmieniaj je. Ja ewentualnie będę mógł dopiero jutro.
AndyB_66 (2026-03-22 20:59:41+00:00): Zrobione :)
Dawid2849 (2026-04-03 16:38:03+00:00): Cześć, 
przed chwilą część drogi została zmieniona z asfaltowej na gruntową utwardzoną: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177739897
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386087958
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1490394985
Dawid2849 (2026-04-04 11:53:53+00:00): Raczej bubel - na BDOT500 jest asfalt
Grzegorz_Kujawa (2026-04-06 12:23:09+00:00): Przywróciłem poprawną nawierzchnię. Dzięki za wychwycenie tego.
habi (2026-03-20 08:37:43+00:00): Hallo davras

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Mit fällt auf, dass du mit `created_by=osm_elevation_browser` eine Software zu benutzen scheinst, die semi-automatisiert Gebäude-Höhen in OpenStreetMap importiert.

Kannst du (z.B. bei https://c.osm.org/c/107) der Schweizer Community ein bisschen Hintergrund dazu geben?

Ä Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi
Taksine (2026-03-20 03:34:02+00:00): 能交流吗？我看不太行
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2026-03-20 11:55:31+00:00): @Taksine 在 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180136386 中进行了回退
Jk488 (2026-03-19 19:34:03+00:00): Please leave comments in English or Georgian so other local editors can understand your changes.
Also, the bus stop name should be in Georgian.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:58:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
NeisBot (2026-03-19 19:24:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13545095464 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Gift shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-27 23:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180525201
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
NeisBot (2026-03-19 19:30:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13643553733 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Wellness center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-27 23:33:07+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180525204
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
b-jazz (2026-03-20 05:34:46+00:00): Thanks for reading the Wiki!! Love that.
NeisBot (2026-03-19 19:45:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12244285867 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Sewing and quilt shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-27 23:33:17+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180525209
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
NeisBot (2026-03-19 19:48:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13582666436 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Clothing store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-20 05:33:13+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-06 07:28:10+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185179778
NieWnen (2026-04-13 20:50:36+00:00): Jeśli ten przy PKP przestał istnieć, to należy to go oznaczyć np. jako disused:highway=bus_stop wraz z miejsce zatrzymania, albo usunąć jeśli nie jest również już widoczny w terenie/na zdjęciach.
W drugim miejscu (kawałek dalej) już był oznaczony przystanek.

Ty przesunąłeś ten spod dworca i usunąłeś ten drugi przez co uszkodziłeś zmapowane relacje autobusowe GPA. Mapowanie linii autobusowych jest dość skomplikowanym zagadnieniem.
Zachęcam do odwiedzenia osm wiki, żeby o nich poczytać: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/ (poszukać po ptv2, route=bus public_transport=* )
W takim przypadku należy przepiąć relacje, które korzystały z 1 przystanku na 2. Podmienić elementy relacji (miejsca oczekiwania/zatrzymania) oraz zmienić samą trasę autobusu dla każdej linii.

Zmiana została częściowo wycofana i relacje zostały naprawione.

Proszę nie mieszaj na przyszłość w 1 zestawie zmian w transporcie publicznych i ich relacjach wraz z losowymi obiektami na terenie szkoły i innych. np. z czego wynika usunięcie obszaru przemysłowego, gdzie na orto widać, że coś tam się buduje (przy Atman DC).
NeisBot (2026-03-19 19:48:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13643788435 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cabinet maker workshop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-27 23:33:20+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180525212
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
NeisBot (2026-03-19 19:54:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13596532477 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Swimwear store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-27 23:33:23+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180525215
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
iandees (2026-03-19 20:05:23+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2309334410 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180127901, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!