piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JochenOSM (2026-07-08 15:40:37+00:00): Keine Ahnung, wie das "Review requested" aktiviert wurde, war keine Absicht. Kein Review erforderlich.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185085267
Growebis (2026-07-04 20:43:46+00:00): I think you accidentally made the Arabian peninsula green by changing natural=peninsula to natural=grassland
eggie (2026-07-04 13:26:17+00:00): Hoi,

De tag voor een ROC is amenity=college.
Het is geen universiteit of hbo instelling.
Pas je het weer aan.

Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-07-04 15:57:14+00:00): De school was al getagd hier. Ik heb university aangepast naar college.
MVG
eggie
DressyPear4 (2026-07-07 12:35:57+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/185262855
DressyPear4 (2026-07-04 15:41:59+00:00): Como já foi comentado anteriormente, a velocidade deve ser a que consta nas placas.
O mapa deve informar ao motorista para descumprir a velocidade implantada por órgãos competentes?
Se a via suporta condições para tráfego com maior velocidade, então a medida seria comunicar ao DNIT ou qualquer outro responsável pela via para que assim ajuste.
Recomendo discutir com a comunidade local sobre tais alterações, caso contrário será considerado vandalismo, as suas alterações serão revertidas e seu usuário bloqueado.
Frans S (2026-07-06 11:06:35+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped them. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks that might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards, and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185086410
nevw (2026-07-09 05:19:08+00:00): Hi, can you resolve this boundary thanks
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.27808&lat=-33.73851&zoom=16
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19176075#map=17/-33.738996/150.277380
SendBhuddist (2026-07-09 05:43:15+00:00): Feel free to do it yourself. I spent a long time trying to work out how and couldn’t find anything useful. I want as far as trawling forums, installing software, you name it. It’s easy to isolate a cliff from a path for example, but I couldn’t work out a way to draw a line and fix that boundary.
SendBhuddist (2026-07-09 05:45:37+00:00): I’m very interested in the solution if you happen to find one. There are lots of ledges in the Blue Mountains that are valuable to articulate on OSM. The same issue will arise again.
nevw (2026-07-09 05:51:49+00:00): I am remote from the here so will leave to others with more skill and knowledge of the area. Cheers.
SendBhuddist (2026-07-09 05:59:28+00:00): I could fix it in 1 min if I knew how to erase the incorrect section of the boundary and retrace it to fill in the blanks (ideally snapping to the existing cliff line 90% of the time, but occasionally following a manually drawn line where the cliffs merge and split). If someone can tell me how to do that please @ me a I’ll do it. Thanks
nevw (2026-07-09 06:19:34+00:00): I’m not familiar with the iD editor. There is no urgency for this so you might find the task more easily managed once gaining further experience and then using the Josm editor where you can download much larger areas and get a better perspective.
alex-ks (2026-07-04 12:00:06+00:00): Une trace GPX est présente également sur mon profil ...
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-05 07:11:06+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is prohibited by both OSM and Google policies--see https://osm.wiki/Google 

https://osm.org/changeset/185125830
Marek-M (2026-07-04 12:01:08+00:00): * poprawki pedestrian we Władysławowie
旧加卷 (2026-07-04 19:50:36+00:00): 关于数据导入问题：
(1) 你在 33.7274663, 97.2556028 - 35.8356165, 100.7707264 四至范围内添加了5689个 natural=peak 元素
(2) 此变更集中的元素与你先前添加的元素重复（名称、地物属性、坐标完全相同）
这两点能证明你所添加的数据为外部导入。数据导入的相关问题已由数据工作组在 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20865 中提及，但显然你无视了数据工作组的提醒且并未遵守社区规则。
关于数据兼容性问题：
你在此变更集以及其他部分变更集中对所有元素添加了 source=GOVPrivGEODB （政府私有地理数据库）标签，这是极为抽象的描述。此类数据的上传活动是否已得到了所谓政府的授权，或数据已有开源相关的声明？鉴于你上传了重复的相同元素，但来源分别指向“2026三江源生物多样性调查”和“GOVPrivGEODB”，我怀疑你的来源描述不实。
数据质量问题：
你所添加的部分 natural=peak 元素的位置并非在山顶。
希望你能回应相关问题。
user_5359 (2026-07-05 10:53:03+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1535182607. What is the mean of the tag sapling = yes
?
Guenni1963 (2026-07-05 12:08:53+00:00): This was meant to indicate very small trees in this reforestation. Since this seems to be not common practice, I have removed this tag.
eggie (2026-07-04 13:21:58+00:00): Dag Gummi,

Is de naam werkelijk fietshub?

We gebruiken eigenlijk niet name= om iets te beschrijven.
..name=bankje, boom, huis...
Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-07-04 14:58:24+00:00): Gebruik deze specificatie...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle_rental%3Ddocking_station
eggie (2026-07-04 15:54:04+00:00): Als bovenstaand aangepast
Sabering (2026-07-12 09:34:30+00:00): Poz, jel imas neku informaciju da se ovo gradi, posle 2023 nema nikakvih informacija, niti se na tlu ista gradi
Frans S (2026-07-05 10:58:59+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
Hi-rise or tall buildings (even with a few stories) need a different way of drawing them than low buildings.

Please check this footage on how to map these buildings

https://youtu.be/u31wPYWkm3E?si=lDbvDutpUyZWQXXL

A more extended explanation with samples can be seen here

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling#Drawing_at_the_roof

Additional find here a link to how to map complex situations
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Koreller/diary/404988#comment61337


Best regards
Hinojal (2026-07-05 20:27:52+00:00): Hello, Frans S.

I've been mapping tall buildings as intended, drawing the outline of the building's roof and then moving it to where the buildings stands. But by your comment I guess I've wrongly mapped some buildings by not having paid enough attention. I see you already fixed the wrongly mapped buildings. Thank you for that and for the comment. I'll be more cautious next time.

Best regards.
literan (2026-07-05 10:29:21+00:00): здесь уже отмечен один спорт-центр, а вы вокруг еще один нарисовали
dzamper (2026-07-07 08:30:47+00:00): dla Ofiar Katynia trzeba wybrać po lewej nie że istnieje DDR tylko że DDR jest wyrysowana osobno :) cycleway:left=separate zamiast cycleway:left=track
laznik (2026-07-05 16:33:37+00:00): Tie "vodopady" by bolo dobre odstranit. Ak chcete tuto upravu branit, urobte tak na fore OSM.

https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osm_sk/CAL520R%3DmZDq5MagmTyVdPJcYrAL4XCAZY201KBgWYiRhVRf3PA%40mail.gmail.com
Marvk (2026-07-04 17:43:25+00:00): Hi, selbe Frage hier, woher maxspeed=40?

Grüße
Marvk (2026-07-04 17:40:52+00:00): Hi Klaus,
woraus ergibt sich hier maxspeed=40? Auf Mapbox konnte ich kein Schild feststellen. Wenn es jetzt ein Schild gibt, sollte auch source:maxspeed angepasst werden.

Grüße
Marv
klausamsee (2026-07-06 07:24:03+00:00): Hi Marv,
sorry, bin nicht so tief im Mappen drin. Auf jeden Fall ist wie beschrieben der beschriebene Bereich mit Limit 40 km/h "Lärmschutz" beschildert. Hatte mich selbst überrascht, steht wohl noch nicht so lange da. Ist aber inzwischen Mode rings um den Bodensee.
Grüße
Klaus
Marvk (2026-07-06 09:55:34+00:00): Hi Klaus,

alles klar, habe die Stellen verbessert, siehe hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185186946

Die beiden wichtigen Tags sind traffic_sign=DE:274-40,DE:1012-36 und source:maxspeed=sign

Grüße
Marv
klausamsee (2026-07-06 09:59:17+00:00): Danke!
Klaus
syntex (2026-07-04 14:20:17+00:00): To nie jest poprawne tagowanie, to jest nadal blok mieszkalny. Znacznik building=* powinien pozostać bez zmian, poprawny będzie dodatkowy znacznik abandoned=yes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned)
OlasMapy (2026-07-04 16:31:39+00:00): zatagowałem tak, bo widziałem tak otagowany opuszczony ośrodek rekreacji gdzieś w Kaszubach gdy przeglądałem mapę
infeeeee (2026-07-06 15:52:18+00:00): Szia!

Nem hagyja a beküldőd ezt annyiban....

Vannak azóta frissebb Mapillary-aink viszont: 

2026-04-14: nincs ott a csap, még leszerelve: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2083400872593648

Az első törlés ezután volt nem sokkal, szóval itt nem tévedett a beküldő, ekkor még tényleg nem volt ott.

2026-05-22: Már ott a csap, visszarakták: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1805285163767069

Ezután több fotón is látszik júniusban, a legfrissebb kép pedig 2026-07-03-án készült, amin látszik a kút (igaz távolról):

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1535338554712200

Szóval a beküldés előtt egy nappal ott volt...
infeeeee (2026-07-09 13:08:42+00:00): Július 7-én is készült róla fotó: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1609624400582138

Visszaállítom a korábbi állapotot.
Petró Tamás (2026-07-10 07:50:05+00:00): ok, köszi.
Svalbard (2026-07-05 04:43:27+00:00): Hallo Alibee, „Aktualisierungen“ ist eine sehr allgemeine Beschreibung Deiner Änderungen. Bitte beachte: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Vielen Dank! Gruß Svalbard
giorgos_solomidis (2026-07-04 13:44:22+00:00): Source:
https://iraklio.gr/el/kykloforiakes-allages-stis-odoys-pr-lofoy-peykon-kai-tis-parodies-toys
Marvk (2026-07-04 17:36:19+00:00): Hi Klaus und willkommen auf OSM!

Die Öffnugngszeiten beim Arzt waren noch in description=* eingetragen. Ich habe das mal korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185102810 :-)

Grüße
Marv
Marvk (2026-07-04 17:36:46+00:00): Upsi, nicht willkommen auf OSM, du bist ja schon länger dabei ;-D
klausamsee (2026-07-06 07:19:32+00:00): Hi Marv,
ja bin schon länger angemeldet, aber bin nur aktiv, wenn ich in meinem Navi Fehler finde.
Grüße
Klaus
SpaghettiMapper (2026-07-06 13:23:28+00:00): Hello, thank you for your mapping. However, I do find that man_made=telescope is not suitable for radar station as the key is intended to be used on telescope for astronomical observation.
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-07 18:30:15+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding these, I've noticed that you are using building=terrace for individual houses. I've fixed it to building=house and house=terraced, leaving building=terrace for a whole (unsplit) row of houses
James Derrick (2026-07-07 21:13:46+00:00): Hi,
My intention was to only use building=terrace for blocks of >2 dwellings (as per the JOSM terracer), but haven't come across house=terraced before.
I'll have a look at the wiki, but know there's THOUSANDS of building=terrace out there, so don't envy any retagging task!
TTFN and Happy Mapping,

James
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-08 10:38:13+00:00): Maybe I'm using the terracer wrongly, it doesn't change the tag for me.

I've found ways to get likely candidates from building=terrace that's been incorrectly used and have fixed a lot of them
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-04 21:59:20+00:00): Hello iSumeri. Could you please add better Changeset Comments to explain what you have done in any edit? "New" and "Edit" don't say anything! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Thanks
Udarian (2026-07-04 15:59:15+00:00): next time please leave a changeset comment describing what you actually did in the changeset. 

Happy mapping,
Udar.
tech_pixie (2026-07-09 10:14:41+00:00): Hi corgicity

Please can I ask that you don't keep adding footpaths from (what appears to be) the PROW overlay? Many of the footpaths in SW Wales are not fully passable and require a decent ground survey to ensure routing and viability are correct. In this particular changeset, to which you have just added paths, the majority of the footpaths have recently been legally altered to be considerably different to the PROW overlay. I have explored all of them by foot and been in discussion with the local community council and council PROW team to ensure they are correctly routed. Please can you revert your changes.

Given that I have spent considerable time on mapping the footpaths in the Cilymaenllwyd community recently I am pretty sure which paths are correct/incorrect but I'd also suggest that many of your other additions in the SW Wales may also have similar issues and suggest that you try and verify if the paths you have mapped really exist on the ground for all of those changesets as well.

Thanks
tech_pixie
corgicity (2026-07-09 14:33:03+00:00): Apologies for mucking up an area that you know well.  Thank you, also, for pointing out the recent changes.  I will be more careful about checking with https://prow-carms.esdm.co.uk/standardmap.aspx for accurate PROWs.  I have undone the incorrect routes I put in.

My feeling is that if they are on a definitive map PROWs should be on openstreetmap even if they are challenging to access.  I know not everyone shares this view. So for example I would typically mark on the map the PROW 4/9/1 (Pencraig Uchaf to Fron).  I will of course leave this to you.

The reason I would do this is that I find it much easier to survey paths and make updates when there is something marked to act as a start point.
tech_pixie (2026-07-10 08:51:52+00:00): Thanks. In many ways I agree with you that if a path is on the PROW then it is good to have a record of it in OSM. But as a map user having theoretical/incorrect data on a map can be pretty annoying. I, and many other runners/cyclists in the area, use the map through providers such as Strava/Komoot/MapMyRide etc and having paths added that are impassable makes generating a route a frustrating process. At times that is already a frustrating process as certain of the websites that use OSM for their underlying maps do not necessarily adhere to the allowed access designated on ways (Strava being the current worst culprit as they allow use of private access roads!). A fair number of local people ask me directly about path access as they know I am trying to get as much mapped correctly as possible. One of the reasons I got into the mapping is that I use it via the mentioned apps when I travel - and in areas where I do not have local knowledge if a path exists it is less than helpful when the map does not show reality. From discussion with the local PROW teams I can also tell you that the online definitive maps they provide are in many cases months/years out of date due to lack of staff/money to get all the latest changes fully implemented. I'd assume that this unlikely to be limited only to the local authorities in this area.
gastromap (2026-07-05 12:03:46+00:00): Also see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3868122 "China's Wenchang Commercial Space Launch Site (also known as the Hainan Commercial Space Launch Site)", should be one area ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316967069
kurisubrooks (2026-07-05 05:08:39+00:00): Building "Office Works" already had the correct "Officeworks" node on it, adding a name to the building separately is superfluous and has been removed.
EneaSuper (2026-07-05 09:02:17+00:00): Ciao, da quello che vedo pare che i tagging siano errati, sia per quanto riguarda ciò che rimane dell'edificio che dell'attività.

Se vuoi sistemo io.
FajrAl (2026-07-07 13:27:41+00:00): Hi, thank you!
Petit Hérisson (2026-07-04 14:19:12+00:00): J'ai oublié de préciser, source=osm notes;streetlevel imagery.
Solaris07 (2026-07-15 13:20:55+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM! Just so you know, Microsoft Building Footprints (MSBF) is generally inaccurate in Australia and therefore not used. In this case, I've checked and these outlines are pretty inaccurate, so I'll be reverting this import. 

Thanks,
Solaris07
k2101 (2026-07-05 14:49:56+00:00): Cześć,

fragment łącznika czeka na decyzję ZRID. To skomplikowane, bo wykonawcą tego odcinka jest firma realizująca inwestycję na linii kolejowej. Nie wiemy kiedy obie części łącznika będą połączone. Dlatego muszę poprawić Twoją edycję i droga nie powinna być jeszcze oznaczona jako construcion.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4970572

Dzięki za doglądanie mapy!
K2101
lunar_jaws812 (2026-07-06 04:34:13+00:00): Hi wombatpandaa,

In this changeset and a few others around the same time, it appears you are surveying Beijing using StreetComplete.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185093856
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185093805
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185093742

However, on the same day, during roughly the same time period as these changesets in Beijing, it appears you are using StreetComplete to survey in North Carolina.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185094847
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185094851
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185095036
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185114074

You're not actually *surveying* in both locations, right?
wombatpandaa (2026-07-06 13:34:04+00:00): No, not exactly. I am currently vacationing at one location and live at the other. I am intimately familiar with both, so every now and then when I have a moment I'll pick my brain for details I remember and log them. If this is detrimental to the fidelity of the project I can wait until I'm physically present at either location - I just figured that for stuff I remember precisely, I might as well log it.
lunar_jaws812 (2026-07-06 15:28:56+00:00): I can't speak for anybody but myself but I think what you're doing is probably fine. I think StreetComplete is typically used for on-the-ground surveying (and I believe it automatically tags changesets with source=survey); one would typically use another editor for remote/armchair mapping an area using aerial imagery and/or local knowledge. 

I hope you're enjoying your vacation. Safe travels, and happy mapping!
lunar_jaws812 (2026-07-06 15:29:06+00:00): I can't speak for anybody but myself but I think what you're doing is probably fine. I think StreetComplete is typically used for on-the-ground surveying (and I believe it automatically tags changesets with source=survey); one would typically use another editor for remote/armchair mapping an area using aerial imagery and/or local knowledge. 

I hope you're enjoying your vacation. Safe travels, and happy mapping!
wombatpandaa (2026-07-08 11:32:44+00:00): I see! Well, thank you for doing your due diligence and the well wishes. Happy mapping to you as well!
silversurfer83 (2026-07-06 20:14:49+00:00): Hi

was genau hast du denn hier gemacht? Da passt der Kommentar ja gar nicht.
小智智 (2026-07-05 00:01:33+00:00): Sorry but why did you revert my London Bridge level fix? Do you know what you are actually doing? There have to be two separate nodes here to stop the router from jumping from the ground level into the underground tunnel!
ratrun (2026-07-05 13:32:47+00:00): Sorry, this was a mistake. Thanks for detecting and repairing!
habi (2026-07-08 14:45:12+00:00): Grüessech Herr Poole
Ich schau mir grad alle key/values in der Schweiz mit `BFS` an (aus Gründen).
Da fiel mir https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1535209379 auf; der Way steht etwas alleine in der Landschaft.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123026644 scheint genau dieselbe Geometrie zu haben, also kann ...379 wohl weg, oder?
Gruss,
Habi
SimonPoole (2026-07-08 14:57:50+00:00): Entfernt, war ein übrig gebliebenes Stück von einem Segment das ich aufteilen musste
DressyPear4 (2026-07-07 22:08:36+00:00): Olá, ajuste melhor a descrição conforme a edição, como por exemplo "Alterei a velocidade da via".
O que seria "conforme maps"? A fonte usada é o google maps?
Lezurex (2026-07-07 10:48:46+00:00): Hallo Röne

Hier hat es ein zweiteiliges und kein dreiteiliges Fahrverbot. Das bestehende Tagging mit motorcar=destination und motorcycle=destination war also korrekt (sofern sich die Signalisation seit meiner letzten Aufnahme nicht entsprechend verändert hat). https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?background=streets&focus=pic&map=19.82/47.2921219/8.4350646&pic=cbb66baa-ff9d-408d-92e0-f1706a2e28eb&seq=a51223e1-740f-4e60-b4dc-6e94308c327c&speed=250&theme=default&users=default&xyz=338.83/23.07/75

Kannst du das bitte rückgängig machen?

LG Lezurex
Röne (2026-07-07 13:28:03+00:00): jetzt sollte es passen, oder?
Lezurex (2026-07-07 13:59:45+00:00): Jein, jetzt hast du zu viel entfernt. Habs korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185267628
Marvk (2026-07-04 17:26:15+00:00): Hi Findusli und willkommen auf OSM!

Sieht gut aus!

Beste Grüße
Marv
eggie (2026-07-04 15:50:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-04 15:41:36+00:00): Hi, thanks for contributing. Could you please clarify this edit?

This way was previously mapped as a parking area (amenity=parking), but this changeset changed the same way to landuse=commercial with LAS Companies LLC name/contact/address tags. If LAS Companies is an office located within a building, it would usually be better to map it as a separate POI/node or indoor/building feature with an appropriate office=* tag, rather than replacing the existing parking-lot polygon.

Also, could you confirm the address? The mapped tags show 1021 11th Ave S #55331, but the LAS Companies website appears to list 1821 11th Avenue South, #55331 as the mailing address and 1021 Brocks Gap Pkwy, Suite 125 as the KW Hoover office.

Would you mind checking whether the parking area should be restored and the office added separately with the correct address? Thanks.
LAS Companies (2026-07-04 15:46:13+00:00): The parking lot is outside of the building. You can easily see a building. Being identified as a parking lot is wrong
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-04 16:53:50+00:00): Thanks for your reply.

I checked all aerial imagery available in OSM for this area. The previously mapped parking lot still appears to exist there, so in my view it should not be replaced by landuse=commercial with company-related tags.

If LAS Companies is located inside a building, it would be better to map the company separately as a POI/office at the appropriate location in or near the building, rather than changing the existing parking area. The parking area should therefore be restored.

Could you please correct this and restore the parking lot?
silversurfer83 (2026-07-06 20:12:36+00:00): Moin,

du hast hier mehrere Objekte, die schon etwas anderes als AEDs sind, *zusätzlich* zu AEDs gemacht. Das wiederspricht der One Feature One Object Regel. 

Kontrollier das bitte noch einmal und reparier es bitte.

Grüße

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185095568
bigbug21 (2026-07-07 19:56:48+00:00): Hallo silversurfer83,
ich habe das bewusst dort gemacht, wo ich keinen genaueren Standort als den vorhandenen POI bestimmen kann und insbesondere Betreiber und Öffnungszeiten gleich mit übernommen werden.
Viele Grüße
Peter
silversurfer83 (2026-07-07 20:06:53+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung.

Halte ich wegen der zitierten Regel trotzdem für falsch. Sollte nicht gemacht werden.

Dann ein aed=yes an den POI
user_5359 (2026-07-05 10:46:04+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2sIE (65 objects, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13988290869 for example). What is the mean of the tag NPSN = 69790416?
Is this a local reference number ?
FajrAl (2026-07-05 16:02:19+00:00): The NPSN are the ID of the school, I think it should be placed with the `ref` tag

NPSN itu ID sekolahnya, harusnya gunakan tag `ref`
user_5359 (2026-07-05 20:09:25+00:00): Please use ref:ID:npsn (include the country code). Please add the these key to the wiki.osm.org
gruhler (2026-07-05 19:11:54+00:00): Ich bin nicht glücklich mit dem was ich hier gemacht habe. Abstellschieber für Wasserleitung so ähnlich gekennzeichnet https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Schieberschild_S_400_2009-01-29.svg aber nur ca 15 cm große Metalldeckel. Habe kein Beispiel gefunden.  4 Objekte insgesamt hier
Kovoschiz (2026-07-05 18:12:21+00:00): This is already moved https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/733853563
vectorial8192 (2026-07-07 14:07:18+00:00): That I did not notice. Will make followup changesets.