piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
cyton (2023-02-24 16:23:54+00:00): Gut, die SC-notes sind immer etwas doof, da man nicht alles sehen kann (was auch sinn macht). 
Das mit der area des waschanlage ist auch besser. Das gehört alles dazu und sonst zu nichts.

Vielleicht noch tunnel oder building_passage an den weg durch das haus, aber sonst super.

Ob man das mit/ohne aussteigen taggen kann weiß ich nicht auswendig.
bwbuz (2023-02-24 16:41:46+00:00): Ich denke Tunnel ist hier ausreichend...so gemappt.
cyton (2023-02-24 16:45:42+00:00): 👍
5R-MFT (2023-02-26 09:39:43+00:00): Gracias por corregir :) me acorde mas tarde.
橘ヒカリ (2023-10-30 21:54:48+00:00): Please stop modify the railway features without verification in Beijing area!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132975420
VLD302 (2023-10-31 16:31:18+00:00): Hello ハチロク

Thank you for your feedback and for reverting the changes. My apologies for the incorrect modification. Please feel free to reach out again if you have any comments, questions, or other concerns. Have a great day!

Sincerely,
Reza
Johnwhelan (2023-03-05 19:37:19+00:00): highway=residential was correct.  road=yes is not an accepted value.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
felipeeugenio (2023-02-24 17:53:03+00:00): Estimado, tanto tiempo.
Por favor usar nombres oficiales. Esas "area verdes ... " 1 y 2 suenan a denominaciones de la constructora. 
Y la 1 tiene dirección? eso no lo había visto nunca en una plaza.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132976491
Hans Thompson (2023-02-24 22:13:59+00:00): Please double check that you are using the most up to date imagery. For way #1149211738, a forest, there has been housing development.  I did not check your other edits.
emersonveenstra (2023-02-24 17:47:24+00:00): Hi,

Road names must not be abbreviated in OSM, can you please fix and expand all the "Rd" to "Road", etc? Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132977486
ivanbranco (2023-02-25 18:41:52+00:00): Ciao,

anche qua noto dei problemi.

- abitanti=178

su OSM si usa per convenzione l'inglese britannico. Per il numero di abitanti si usa population=*.  Qua però manca un tag che descriva cosa sia l'area (area=yes) non è abbastanza. Da quello che mi sembra di capire staresti cercando di mappare degli isolati, un tag adatto potrebbe essere https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:place%3Dcity_block

Da dove stai prendendo questi dati però? 

Un altro consiglio è quello di non collegare aree alla geometria delle strade.

p.s. hai cancellato un attraversamento pedonale, non so se fosse voluto
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
SekeRob (2023-02-24 18:38:26+00:00): Hi,

Finally, a multi year annoyance, someone deciding that some admin ruling of an SR5 designation superceded ther signs at the side of the road, and new ones still being placed anno 2022.

What I'm a bit confused about is that Via Tiburtina Valeria is signed all the way till the rail underpass at Largo Eugenio Sirolli in Pescara, Wiki says so too in words, but the route relation ends at Chieti Scalo at this time. Am I missing something, more work in the pipeline on this?
👍👍👍👍

PS, the map note from circa 2020 can now be closed, for now.
IlBano (2023-02-25 09:15:16+00:00): Hi SekeRob.
During my QA sessions I see a lot of long running route relations that are broken at an impossible level, so I do my best to put them back in shape.

In this case I didn't make a local survey, but I based my edit on public available information on ANAS web site. In this case SS5 formally stops at RA12 intersection which, by the way, is the place where you find the Chieti sign as per Mapillary images (ANAS, as a general rule, doesn't manage highways that are inside a "centro abitato" with a population greater that 10.000 people).
I would also say that locally posted signs about highway refs are usually not promptly adapted when the formal classification changes, so it could be difficult to say what's really authoritative.
Anyway... since as I presume, looking at your edits area, that you have local knowledge about the current configuration of SS5 in Chieti/Pescara, I will be more than happy to modify the relation based on your input.

Thanks

IlBano
SekeRob (2023-02-25 10:40:04+00:00): Hi IlBano,

Sadly, back to the original, no consensus, of what the Via Tiburtina Valeria / SS5 is on OSM and what continues to be absent as a historical route relation on the OSM system for the full stretch of 214km as pictured in the same wiki

https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/it:Strada%20statale%205%20Via%20Tiburtina%20Valeria?uselang=en#/media/File:Strada_statale_5.png

and this which happily continues to reference the SR5 exSS5, the ref=SR5 which sticks out including smack in the middle of > 10000 inhabitants areas.

https://percorsostrada.it/strada-regionale/sr5-exss5/

I'll sleeps on this a bit more.

cheers
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
northcatherina (2023-02-24 18:13:21+00:00): изменение назначения здания
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
wkdgs (2023-02-28 14:18:34+00:00): Kannst du noch den Tag "razed:building=yes" entfernen? Der macht ja dann keinen Sinn mehr.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132978597
emersonveenstra (2023-02-25 17:33:16+00:00): Reverting for vandalism, making everything a building even if it's very much not a building, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/988398748 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/988398745 for examples
Berasce (2023-02-25 17:48:25+00:00): Greetings. I've made a big package of improvements to cartography. I needed to transfer data from OSM to SketchUp for further work. Only for this reason, the objects I created were transferred to the category of buildings. After unloading the map, they were all returned to their original positions. I think you should thank me for contributing so many polygons I've built, rather than writing about Vandalism.

Sincerely
Berasce (2023-02-25 17:50:14+00:00): Other objects cannot be imported through CadMapper otherwise, so I had no other choice. I needed the data for an architectural project. Immediately after, I independently returned everything to its original positions.
emersonveenstra (2023-02-25 17:51:12+00:00): They weren’t all returned to their original tags, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/988398748/history for example. Also, deliberately breaking the map for your own purposes is strictly forbidden, no matter what the reason. I’m not going to thank you for making me do extra work to clean up after your careless map breaking, sorry.
Berasce (2023-02-25 18:01:20+00:00): One way or another, the city of Portage after my edits has become much more developed. I also leveled many of the roads and streets, giving them a smoother and more beautiful look, which was not done before. If I accidentally missed any edits, I apologize.

Sincerely
Woazboat (2023-02-25 18:14:52+00:00): Adding and changing data in OSM that is accurate and correct is great. Incorrectly changing OSM data to work around the limitations of another program is absolutely not. Not even temporarily. 

If you want to use OSM data with some other program and doing so would require making incorrect changes to OSM you have two options:

1) fix the program to work with the correct data
2) download the osm data and make your changes offline
Berasce (2023-02-25 18:26:37+00:00): I will be sincerely grateful to you if you teach me, explain how to do this? I really never used the autonomous mode in Open Street Map. I would like to learn with pleasure how to do it right.

I mean the import of OSM data not through Cadmapper, but in other ways.
Berasce (2023-02-25 18:27:18+00:00): And thank you very much for the recommendation! I will try to listen to you!
impiaaa (2023-02-25 21:42:03+00:00): If you use JOSM, the Java OpenStreetMap editor, you can download data, edit it, and save it to a file, then open this file in your program.
ovruni (2023-02-25 05:28:17+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se menciona "corrección de etiquetas", sin embargo se agregan etiquetas inexistentes en osm, por favor revise la documentación en la wiki sobre las etiquetas. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page
ian727 (2023-02-25 23:18:35+00:00): This changeset apparently "deleted" the park (probably a hole in the relation or something). Please fix.
MxxCon (2023-02-25 03:57:01+00:00): Hello.
You deleted way 183794674, however according to satellite imagery it's still there. Could you please elaborate on this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132979023
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
V-Li (2023-02-27 14:48:38+00:00): Hallo, Öffnungszeiten werden nicht in natürlicher Sprache erfasst, sondern folgen einem festen Schema, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours.

Eine Hilfe kann dir 
https://www.webmapping.cyou/WebToOSMOH/ oder StreetComplete sein.
coolmad (2023-02-27 22:29:35+00:00): Hallo V-Li, vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Das wusste ich nicht. Der Konverter ist genial. Ich habe gleich weitere Öffnungszeiten korrigiert. 
VG coolmad
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
SekeRob (2023-02-24 18:46:14+00:00): Becaaause that's where my GPS said they were when taking a picture and annotating the bus stop number, like here 445 (sticker on pole ;o)

Hasta la vista
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
sdicke (2023-02-28 11:05:03+00:00): Korrektur des Rechtschreibfehlers in der Beschreibung: Weiterer statt Weiter
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
MxxCon (2023-02-25 03:58:49+00:00): Hello.
When performing such updates, please make sure to preserve gnis:* tags since they contain useful information.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132979770
mavl (2023-04-23 15:47:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Buraddo (2023-02-24 18:32:22+00:00): Lege nr.214 din 13 noiembrie 2012
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-29 05:41:53+00:00): Reverted by DWG as apparent undiscussed import by OEG, possibly using unauthorised data sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140522445
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Osmwithspace (2023-07-28 11:25:39+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier zwei Wege übereinander eingezeichnet. Das soll eigentlich nicht sein. In so einem Fall wird ein Weg gezeichnet und mit entsprechenden Tags ausgestattet.
Und was meinst du mit "surface=in_vorbereitung"? Existiert dieser Weg noch nicht?
Grüße Osmwithspace
LDKpfadfinder (2023-07-29 03:17:56+00:00): Der eigezeichnete Weg ist in Planung und sollte eigentlich dieses Jahr fertig werden- der ursprüngliche Weg wird dazu zum Teil überbaut- ist aber zur Zeit noch existent- der zusätzliche Eintrag sollte  eigentlich nur auf die zu erwartende Verbesserung hinweisen- im Moment gibt es Verzögerungen mit den Fördergeldern- es wird mit der Fertigstellung im nächsten Jahr gerechnet! Inclusive Brücke über die Dill
Osmwithspace (2023-07-29 21:32:15+00:00): Hallo,
ich hab das mal etwas angepasst:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139189656

Was genau bedeutet der Name "RSV Haiger Wetzlar in Planung"?
Und existiert die Brücke dann aktuell auch noch nicht?
Grüße Osmwithspace
LDKpfadfinder (2023-07-30 20:45:23+00:00): Hallo, RSV steht für Radschnellverbindung, der in Bereichen bereits fertig ist- bzw. schrittweise fertig gestellt wird- hierbei gibt es normalerweise 80% Fördermittel vom Land Hessen- Asslar  hat dem Ganzen durch eigene Aktivitäten und durch die Nähe zu Wetzlar vorgegriffen und ist der normalen Planung voraus- Siehe die beiden Brücken Richtung Werdorf. Beste Grüße und Zuversicht
Osmwithspace (2023-08-02 11:21:45+00:00): Also, wenn das ein ausgeschilderter Radweg ist/wird, dann sollte dieser als Relation gemappt werden und nicht als Name des einzelnen Wegs. Wenn dem so ist, hast du da noch ein paar mehr Infos zu?

Und existiert die Brücke schon, die südlich an diesen Wegabschnitt grenzt?
LDKpfadfinder (2023-08-02 15:53:40+00:00): Danke für eure qualifizierte Unterstützung! Die Brücke wird wahrscheinlich so wie letztes Jahr in dem anderen Abschnitt Richtung Werdorf zuerst gelegt und dann die Fahrbahn zügig asphaltiert- dazu ist auch schon ein Gehölzabschnitt im Frühjahr gerodet worden, um wegen der Brutzeit keinen Zeitverzug zu bekommen- leider hängt es jetzt an der Zuteilung der Fördergelder-dann wird alles sicher sehr schnell gehen- hatte eine klaren Rücksprache mit Bürgermeister Schwarz aus Asslar!
So wie es jetzt dargestellt ist gibt es sicher keine Irritationen- danke nochmals!
Osmwithspace (2023-08-08 11:07:23+00:00): Hab es jetzt nochmal abschließend bearbeitet:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139607696
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132980937
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Langlaeufer (2023-02-24 19:47:17+00:00): Darf ich auch hier davon ausgehen das du mit Betonplatten. Betonstein-Gehwegplatten  meinst?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132981294
Langlaeufer (2023-02-25 07:57:21+00:00): Darf ich das auf paving_stone ändern?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132981294
nowhereman (2023-03-06 14:55:07+00:00): Sorry - war unterwegs. 
Ja klar ich bin noch "new-bee" und muss mich bei den Details noch zurechtfinden
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132981294
Langlaeufer (2023-02-24 19:45:25+00:00): Die Gehwegplatten aus Beton zählen als paving_stones. concrete:plates sind große dicke Schwerlastplatten für Fahrbahnen und ggf. alte aufgebrochene Betonfahrbahnen.
DeFra85 (2023-02-27 09:31:09+00:00): Siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3576684
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
wille (2023-02-28 23:00:22+00:00): Olá, tudo bem? Qual a fonte em que você encontrou a informação de nome desses viadutos?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132981490
user_18541240 (2023-02-28 23:30:44+00:00): Meu irmão mora nesse local !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132981490
user_18541240 (2023-02-28 23:36:27+00:00): Moro na cidade e estou sendo ajudado por amigos e familiares com informações mais precisas!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132981490
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].