piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mapiate (2025-12-19 15:15:40+00:00): Hi, in this changeset a turning circle was already present. If you're adding the highway around the barrier for the turning circle, then you can adjust the existing highway geometry so it's not replicated with another object. Additionally, the highway that was added was not connected to other highways. That condition will display as warnings before uploading the changeset. If you need help correcting this let me know.
Linus W Frische (2026-02-08 11:01:12+00:00): Du har tilføjet navne der inkluderer beliggendheden for tankstationerne, men dette er ikke korrekt. Navnet bør være name=OIL! og afdelingen kan så tilføjes med branch=Aalborg, Nibevej. Ret det venligst tilbage
samuelzammit (2025-12-20 13:57:00+00:00): Hi, thanks for your edits!

Do you have imagery from 2025-12-18 or later by any chance? The road layout was modified on that date, since the flyover is now open to traffic.

Official source: facebook.com/reel/2020898642020387/
BakoyeRiver (2025-12-23 16:53:00+00:00): Hello samuelzammit,

Thank you for the information provided! There is imagery from 2025-12-22, and it shows vehicles actively moving on the flyover. With this imagery, I have opened the construction here.
Happy mapping!
apm-wa (2026-01-01 22:53:20+00:00): Where is the spelling "Babaarap" attested?
Frans S (2026-01-02 11:50:13+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
Please square each building with the q key while selected.
Best regards
eggie (2025-12-18 15:47:17+00:00): Je hebt hier 	Brouwerskade 23 RG ergens anders heengesleept?

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176101707

Dit komt waarschijnlijk omdat je schuift met de kaart in editmodus.
Het beste kun je het gebied klein houden zodat je niet hoeft te schuiven.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-18 15:48:29+00:00): Het adres heb ik teruggeplaatst..
Mapse
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-22 19:07:54+00:00): Ссылка на вики склад битая. Добавьте просто название файла начинающееся с File:
Angel Miklashevsky (2025-12-22 20:03:56+00:00): Готово.
Angel Miklashevsky (2025-12-25 14:01:28+00:00): Подскажите, пожалуйста, когда новое место появится на карте?
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-25 16:11:39+00:00): Перезагрузите вкладку без кеша https://osm.wiki/RU:Кэш_браузера

Границы сёл нарисованные линиями не отрисовываются на страндартное слое. Только когда они обозначены точкой. Добавил точку. 

Соседние сёла обозначены немного не по правилам и поэтому показываются на карте
Angel Miklashevsky (2025-12-25 21:52:14+00:00): Теперь точка видна, но не видны границы поселения, в отличие от соседних поселений. Почему так?
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-26 13:01:13+00:00): На соседних селах есть тег landuse=residential и он даёт серую заливку. Но это неправильно, потому что далеко не всё что залито серым является жилой территорией
Angel Miklashevsky (2025-12-26 13:24:15+00:00): Понял. Спасибо!
felipeeugenio (2025-12-19 14:19:25+00:00): Hola.
No, eliminó edificios completos para agregarlos individualizados como salas. Además lleno de parques.

El mapeo de interiores es algo complejo en OSM. Se ha realizado con algún éxito en la UTFSM y en la PUC. 
Es información valiosa, sin duda, no obstante ten algo que hay que aprender a hacer.

Por favor integrarse al chat de la comunidad en OSM Chile en Telegram en el link https://t.me/OSMcl ahí cientos de maperos lo pueden ayudar a entender la wiki si es que hace falta. Voy a intentar arreglar esto en todo caso, pero por favor tomar en cuenta que si bien aprender el fácil, se requiere de tiempo y paciencia.

saludos
felipeeugenio (2025-12-19 14:38:01+00:00): Ahí hice un arreglo parcial.
Las salas son room=classroom. Pueden ser expresadas como un área o como un nodo. Las dejé como nodos porque es más fácil por ahora.

Además su número no es un nombre (name=) es un ref= y es sólo el número. no =Sala XX. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:room%3Dclassroom)

Refuse los edificios borrados, que estaban bastante mal hecho la verdad, pero eran una unidad, no un conjunto de varios pequeños.

en la tarde sigo trabajando en esto. gracias por la información, pero por favor unirse al chat de la comunidad.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176102770
ggorzki (2025-12-19 09:10:33+00:00): Cześć. Zabrakło naniesionej relacji: Wojska Polskiego -> w lewo w Okulickiego
syntex (2025-12-19 10:46:47+00:00): Racja, oneway=yes zostało z poprzedniej tymczasowej organizacji ruchu. Zmieniłem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176134541
eggie (2025-12-18 16:34:48+00:00): Dag Thunderstruck,

In het vervolg graag de adresnode intact laten. Dus alleen de bedrijfsinfo verwijderen.

MVG
eggie
Thunderstruck (2025-12-18 16:45:03+00:00): ah, thnx eggie! dank voor herstellen
eggie (2025-12-18 16:50:36+00:00): No problem..
VA00 (2025-12-19 06:20:16+00:00): Musiałeś skasować betonowy przejazd kolejowy, jedyny odcinak na którym pozostały szyny, który pieczołowicie wczoraj wrysowałem? Sporo się przy tym napracowałem :-(
Joseph R P (2025-12-27 23:06:20+00:00): Hello. Just to let you know, the ramp you mapped here no longer exists and was demolished a couple years ago. The interchange right here is being reworked.
YukinoLR (2025-12-30 12:58:23+00:00): Hello Joseph,
Thank you so much for the correction! I've already noticed the data was outdated and had it reverted.
I’m sorry for the confusion caused by the demolished ramp. In the future, I will be sure to cross-reference with Sentinel-2 imagery to ensure the road network reflects the most current state.
Thanks again for your help in keeping the map accurate!
Best regards,
YukinoLR
eggie (2025-12-18 19:18:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
leendertva (2025-12-18 19:45:14+00:00): Dankjewel!
marc__marc (2026-01-19 17:33:03+00:00): les signalements d'osmose dont tu parles ne sont pas à propos des adresses
ils sont à propos de la possibilité d'ajouter des tags en plus avec l'opendata
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/issue/1406a499-0f4f-8a06-b2cb-e0dca94aca9d
propose d'ajouter :
start_date = 1966-11-08
ref:FR:SIRET = 21260198300043
contact:email = ce.0260260S@ac-grenoble.fr
contact:phone = +33 475010890
Phil2604 (2026-01-19 17:57:01+00:00): Je pense qu’on ne parle pas de la même chose. J’ai ajouté les conteneurs lors de la MAJ de l’école. 
Osmose me renvoie un message avec un problème d’adresse nom et position de rue et ne parle pas des attributs complémentaires que tu cites. Je verrai de les intégrer plus tard.
marc__marc (2026-01-20 03:33:07+00:00): peux tu partager le lien vers le signalement osmose ?
quand je regarde ceux des objets que tu as signalé en dernier, j'en vois 24 à propos des écoles mais aucun concernant les adresses
I-76 (2026-03-02 15:16:28+00:00): not bio
Zrop (2025-12-18 18:13:18+00:00): Hallo bernward1,
wieso löschst Du hier schon wieder einen Unterstand https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455276214 ? Wurde dieser wirklich abgebaut ?

Gruß
Zrop
bernward1 (2025-12-19 10:19:41+00:00): Nein der Unterstand wurde nicht abgebaut. Er war nur doppelt gemapped an der Plattform und als eigenes Objekt. 
Laut der Beschreibung im Wiki ist das falsch. 

Im Wiki steht auf der Seite "Tag:public_transport=platform" für das Tag shelter=yes folgendes:
shelter=yes wird verwendet "Wenn es einen Unterstand gibt, der nicht durch ein seperates amenity=shelter erfasst sein wurde".
Das heißt, wenn es einen separaten Unterstand gibt schreibt man an die Haltestelle nicht shelter=yes.

Um das zu korrigieren kann man entweder das separate Objekt löschen oder man löscht den Tag shelter=yes Tag am Platformobjekt.
Das extra Unterstandobjekt Icon überdeckt oft auf den offiziellen OSM Karten das Haltestellenicon wenn sie nahe beianander liegen. 
Daher habe ich mich entschlossen das Tag shelter=yes beizubehalten und das Extraobjekt zu löschen.

Wenn das Tag:highway=bus_stop (relevant für das Haltestellen-Icon) und das Wartehäuschen nicht nebeneinader liegen kann in einigen Fällen sinnvoll sein sowohl den Standort des Unterstands zu mappen als auch das Plattformobjekt.
Dann ist aber laut Wikiseite "Key:shelter" am Haltestellenknoten nicht "shelter=yes" sondern "shelter=separate" einzutragen.
Zrop (2025-12-19 13:38:11+00:00): er war nicht doppelt gemappt. "shelter=yes" gibt nur an das an der Haltestelle ein Unterstand vorhanden ist, aber nicht wo. Mit "amenity=shelter" wird das eigentliche Objekt an der richtigen Stelle erfasst.

Und das überdecken ist ein Problem des Renderer, deswegen löschen wir keine vorhandenen Objekte.
bernward1 (2025-12-19 15:41:08+00:00): Dann lies doch bitte im Wiki nach. Ich habe extra die Stellen angegeben. 
shelter=yes wird nur gemapped, wenn es kein extra Objekt gibt. Sonst heißt es shelter=separate.
Zrop (2025-12-19 16:14:09+00:00): hab ich,
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:shelter
- "shelter=yes: A shelter exists, which may or may not be mapped separately"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter
- "shelter=yes: Ein Unterstand ist vorhanden. Dieser kann separat erfasst sein oder auch nicht"

Und ich kenne auch die Diskussion
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wartehauschen-shelter-an-wartebereich-und-als-eigener-node/125204
marc__marc (2025-12-19 08:02:23+00:00): Bonjour,
il me semble y avoir des way découpé qui sont sans rapport avec l'itinéraire, par ex https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459609220
mat (2025-12-19 17:41:50+00:00): Il y a aussi des way qui ont été tronquées, comme https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/269102330/history#map=18/45.797702/-0.951562&layers=N
marc__marc (2025-12-19 18:06:02+00:00): effectivement dans l'historique on voit que la route continuant vers le sud avec le prochain nœud https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2743928215 nœud qui est pour l'instant connecté à une seul autre rue
3 noeuds plus koin https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/798167878 il n'y a non plus pas de  Grande Rue qui le connecte
je vais malheureusement faire un revert des modifs des way et route en essayant de garder les modifs des noeufs.
d'une manière générale je pense que 1428 en 1x rend le changeset difficile à comprendre donc a vérifier (et ile fait de ne pas télécharger la zone fait que des alertes du validateur sont moins pertinante
marc__marc (2025-12-19 18:42:12+00:00): voila c'est annulé en conservant quasi toute les modifications des noeuds
par contre j'ai constaté à cette occasion la suppression des anciennes relations pour en recréer des nouvelles, ce n'est pas non plus une bonne pratique car elle perd l'historique.
pour traiter des ways avec autant de relation, je te conseille fortement de charger les parents si tu as utilisé overpass avec <;out meta;>;out meta
Il est même utile de lancer le validateur avant de découper, histoire de résoudre ce qui doit l’être indépendamment afin que le validateur puisse ensuite te dire ce que tu casses avant envoi au lieu d'être noyé
Lisapple (2025-12-22 18:33:29+00:00): Merci beaucoup Marc.
Effectivement, c'était une belle erreur de ma part de penser que j'allais pouvoir mettre à jour toutes les lignes en une seule fois, mais devoir découper les routes pour coller aux trajets ligne par ligne créé trop de conflits, ce qui devenait ingérable.
Je vais donc revoir ma copie en ne faisant qu'une ligne de bus à la fois, quitte à ce que ça prenne une trentaine de changesets, ce qui me permettra de limiter les erreurs potentielles, et enfin de comprendre comment j'ai pu perdre des morceaux de route (sans même m'en rendre compte).
Merci.
user_5359 (2025-12-19 08:34:53+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13386952428 (one of seventeen objects). What is the mean of the tags
CODE_ADRES = 00202
COMMUNE = ANYAMA
ID = 41182
NOM_PADA = RUE CHEKOU MARIE ABACON
PAYS = CÔTE D'IVOIRE
VILLE = ABIDJAN
?
Guy Maurel KONAN (2025-12-19 08:51:00+00:00): Hello, I’m correcting this; it’s an error. Thank you.
Frank Peng (2025-12-24 09:48:25+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19192
Piskvor (2025-12-19 11:18:17+00:00): Zdravím, ten most dosud existuje, jde o můstek nad nouzovým průjezdem do Motola: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369980747 

Že si ho lze ze silnice těžko všimnout, to je pravda; je to standardní konstrukce z prefabrikovaných materiálů. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q108417804

Revert war začínat nehodlám, jen jsem upravil layer na té podcházející cestě.

Mapování zdar,
Piškvor
comfyquiettree (2025-12-20 18:58:35+00:00): Ahojky, díky za přidání layer - předpokládala jsem, že když je otagován tunnel, tak bude i správně layer. 

Přijde i ovšem, že odstr. bridge je zde správný krok. Minimálně dle mé zkušenosti panuje shoda, že buď taguji most nebo tunel, nikoliv oboje zároveň (a na wiki je to též tak popsáno). 

WD item a Commons fotky jsem před editem viděla a právě i kvůli nim jsem ponechala tunnel a odstranila bridge.

Pokud ovšem vidíte důvod proč zanechat oba, tak ráda prodiskutuji revertnu svůj edit :)

S přáním hezkého dne,
cqt
NeisBot (2025-12-19 06:57:53+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 21 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/90193779 v4 | 11 crossings
https://osm.org/way/84456804 v7 | 10 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/294198041 v10

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176105247
NeisReview (2026-01-03 12:25:14+00:00): ✅ Should by fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/176128477

Thanks @nigna
NeisReview (2026-01-03 12:27:42+00:00): ✅ Should by fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/176128477

Thanks @nigna
NeisBot (2025-12-19 06:57:54+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/292778369 v3 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/181977216 v8 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1923286273 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176105332
NeisReview (2026-01-03 12:25:14+00:00): ✅ Should by fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/176164659

Thanks @compulsive_cartographer
NeisReview (2026-01-03 12:27:42+00:00): ✅ Should by fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/176164659

Thanks @compulsive_cartographer
Dimitar155 (2025-12-21 18:22:03+00:00): SC не би трябвало да те пита за бордюри тук, тъй като те са отбелязани отделно. Действително ли е от куест, или има специален слой с бордюри?
Fraxi (2025-12-21 19:21:09+00:00): Quest беше. Това на първо време се сещам. Иначе в SCEE(Extra edition) има възможност да си създадеш слой.
Fraxi (2025-12-21 19:23:00+00:00): "expert edition", пардон.
Fraxi (2025-12-21 19:28:07+00:00): Мисля, че иконката беше като тази от https://github.com/Helium314/SCEE/blob/modified/metadata/en-US/images/phoneScreenshots/screenshot6.png
(над "Create new note")
Dimitar155 (2025-12-21 19:52:54+00:00): Махнах тага, но не мога да го възпроизведа. Може би му трябва малко време, за да "разбере" за промяната.
Fraxi (2025-12-21 20:05:46+00:00): Ако трябва, изтрий кеша на SC и дръпни данните от OSM отново.
Fraxi (2025-12-22 09:43:30+00:00): Сега не ме пита
ceirios (2025-12-20 12:27:03+00:00): Hi there, are you sure these are all heaths?

A lot of upland areas were wrongly tagged as "heath" when in fact they are more grassland.
etgg (2025-12-20 16:33:59+00:00): Hi there, the areas tagged to the east were labelled heath hence the changes , but have changed back to grassland now. Thanks,
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-25 13:51:17+00:00): hello!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459615366/history - that was supposed to be shop=shoes - right?
b-jazz (2025-12-21 19:04:24+00:00): FYI, you have duplicate fairways sitting on top of each other in a couple of places on this course. Maybe you did an errant copy/paste or duplicate or something like that. Did you want to clean these up, or do you need a hand?
benguuuuu (2025-12-21 19:34:39+00:00): Interesting, I wonder if that happened when I came back in with a saved JSOM session...maybe it re-uploaded or something so it stacked.  If you can update, otherwise I'll get to it.
martien-176 (2025-12-24 20:18:53+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping. 

Please map each building as a separate object. Do not combine multiple nearby buildings into one. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the roofs and look for the gaps between the buildings or different roof colors to help determine where one building ends and another begins.

After mapping buildings, please remember to square their corners. Most buildings have square corners because that's easy to build. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that the corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, use the `Q` key to square the corners. This [video about squaring features](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a guide.

Please check out these sources for more info: 
- Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
- Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ 
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT global validator.
felipeeugenio (2025-12-19 14:08:24+00:00): Hola. Estas aguas que dibujó existen realmente? son fuentes suponemos.

También llama la atención el Parque. Se llama así realmente?

Son estas ediciones para jugar a alguna app?

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176106830
R4v3nB14ck (2025-12-19 14:53:50+00:00): La zona de agua de la pergola es una "fuente", bastante amplia que parece estanque.

en la zona de tortugas son estanques de agua, no fuentes, literalmente hay tortugas.

supongo que te refieres al que dice "tortugas" seguro me equivoqué al indicar los tags de las zonas verdes y quedó como parque, todas las zonas verdes marcadas al rededor y al interior de la universidad son cesped y arboles.
dp7 (2025-12-19 11:56:34+00:00): Ciao Fra00
Questa tua modifica ha interrotto la relazione di un percorso escursionistico, puoi verificare per favore ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18511108#map=13/43.16211/13.10703
Grazie !
dp7 (2025-12-19 12:01:14+00:00): Ti segnalo anche questa, passante per lo stesso punto:
https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=16751540
osmmapper222 (2025-12-18 20:26:23+00:00): Hallo Hirtem,

wenn Gebäude aus OSM einfach gelöscht werden, kann es passieren, dass ein anderer Mapper dieses auf Basis von Luftbildern erneut kartiert. Daher ist es ratsam, ein abgerissene Gebäude von buildung=*   nach demolished:building=* umzutaggen.

Bzgl. dem Mensaneubau: befindet sich hier aktuell oder bald eine Baustelle?

Ggf. könnte man diese einzeichnen, um darüber den Baufortschritt zu verfolgen.
ChrissW-R1 (2025-12-27 11:16:31+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/5106658
Sylabowy Kot (2025-12-18 18:25:48+00:00): + przeniesienie adresów na obszary
DressyPear4 (2025-12-30 23:53:08+00:00): Você percebeu que deletando membros de uma relação ela fica quebrada?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176108286
sab27 (2025-12-19 13:55:40+00:00): I included the wrong details  in this changeset. This is not in Chad, but in Burkina Faso - it should just read #mapyourgrid
Udarian (2025-12-18 19:04:15+00:00): the reason this is so geographically large is because I opened the route to look at it, didn't do anything with it, closed it and iD applied some auto formatting, it was not intentional.
Gregory Peony (2025-12-18 19:58:37+00:00): Hi, some of the deletions you made here seem appropriate, because some of the existing building footprints did not accurately represent buildings, however you also deleted a marketplace POI in the process. Worry not; I restored it. just take care when deleting in future, using filters and double checking what you've deleted before uploading can help you prevent and spot invalid deletions.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
silversurfer83 (2025-12-20 13:33:12+00:00): Hi there :)

you changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13384564030 from shop=collector to shop=car with second_hand=only. 
Was that intentional?

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176109525
RoseBTCmap (2025-12-20 14:01:33+00:00): Hello, 
Thank you for writing and sorry for the inconvenience. 
It was a mistake when adding the node and I didn't notice. 
I already fixed it. 
Greetings.
silversurfer83 (2025-12-20 14:05:03+00:00): thanks for the quick response

happy mapping
eggie (2025-12-18 19:27:49+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Alleen een naam doet niets in OSM. Ik heb een officetag toegevoegd en de info samengevoegd met de adresnode.
MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2025-12-18 19:13:22+00:00): Hi The Real McQueen Lake, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 13 highway(s)
- 12 name(s)
- 13 surface(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176109871
Viajero Perdido (2025-12-18 19:35:26+00:00): Alerted by the bot...

That's not the way to do this. Please see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
The Real McQueen Lake (2025-12-18 20:42:59+00:00): Thank you for directing me to that wiki. I wish it worked to mark them differently, but it really doesn't in this situation. I had public going in the wash rooms just a couple days ago when I had students there. Can you imagine if public just went into a school without checking in to use the bathrooms. They are best left off for this and many other reasons that we constantly deal with.
The Real McQueen Lake (2025-12-18 20:47:34+00:00): #DeletionsCheck
eerib (2025-12-18 22:08:35+00:00): What may help is marking the trails with the correct access tags.

If the public is restricted from using the trails at all times then you can mark them as access=private.

If the public can use some of the trails then you can mark those specific trails as access=yes or access=permissive depending on the specific legality.

If you want to get more granular then you can mark each individual mode, such as foot=yes, horse=no, motor_vehicle=no, motorcycle=no, bicycle=no, mtb=no, atv=no.

If this is done then apps like AllTrails, Gaia GPS, and OnX will display the trails with those access details, however it may take a few months for those apps to update. Usually they'll mark the trail in red and append the text "(PRIVATE)" or "(NO ACCESS)" to the end of the trail name if a trail is marked with access=no.

You may also want to consider putting up signage at entry points and along trails at certain intervals to inform the public of the restrictions.
woodpeck (2025-12-18 23:31:50+00:00): The DWG is tracking this in Ticket#2025121810000281. The deletions are against OSM's rules and have been rightfully reverted. Repeated deletion of these tracks violates our terms and will be considered vandalism.
woodpeck (2025-12-19 00:32:13+00:00): I am having second thoughts about the *names* of these trails. I wonder if they are surveyable on the ground. If not, maybe the names need removing. If they are surveyable, some abbreviations might need expanding ("McQueen Lk Blue XC Tr").