piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
citrula (2024-03-01 07:35:05+00:00): Please use the unabbreviated version of the street name!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147749643
LouisXIV (2024-03-16 16:15:50+00:00): Why did you replace the area I had marked for the supercharger with a single node? 
I had precisely marked the 8 parking spots of the Supercharger.
LouisXIV (2024-03-16 16:25:41+00:00): I mean 12, there is 8 superchargers + 4 wallbox.
Jan Olieslagers (2024-02-22 11:08:20+00:00): I am unhappy with the use of a second "aeroway=aerodrome" tag. Is this really a separate aerodrome? I intend to retag as "aeroway=helipad".
maction (2024-02-23 19:34:44+00:00): As well, I'm not happy of this tagging, but ...

Vertiports are a new category of airports usually with several take-off and landing areas for eVTOL and further infrastructure taking a similar role than aerodromes (or heliports). But helicopter are not allowed to land or take-off. 

Official maps (e.g. Geoviewer BW) show the Vertiport in Bruchsal by an additional aircraft symbol next to the aircraft symbol of the "Flugplatz". So, it is distinct from and not part of the "Flughafen" but again similar to an aerodrome. 

Unfortunately, there seem no appropriate or better OSM tag for Vertiports (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertiport) and aerodrome seems to be the best match. Tagging as helipad would worsen the mapping since helicopters are not allowed to land or take-off at Vertiports.

As a result I suggest maintaining the existing tagging for the time being.
Jan Olieslagers (2024-02-23 20:29:06+00:00): Aaargh, and I just did retag it as a helipad. Feel free to revert!
But, for what I can make from your words, this would perhaps be a place mostly or even exclusively for operation of drones? We do lack dedicated tags for that, as yet we come nearest with model_aerodrome.
Where to discuss, perhaps on some talk page of the wiki?
M.fr.Gr.,
Jan Olieslagers (2024-02-23 20:43:38+00:00): On second thoughts: how's about "aeroway=vertiport"? That is new and unedited, but I think a certain degree of boldness must be permitted.
Jan Olieslagers (2024-02-24 14:59:56+00:00): I have opened discussion at the wiki's relevant talk page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Aeroways#Vertiport
pitfire (2024-02-22 07:09:17+00:00): Hallo iudex_non_calculat ,

du hast hier drei Straßen 

( Bachstraße (23479322), v9 / Albert-Sonntag-Straße (25093943), v10 / Gottfried-Keller-Straße (28180658), v10 )

auf „bicycle_road=yes“ erweitert. 

Hattest Du vor Ort die vollständige Beschilderung überprüft?
Gib es Fahrbahnmarkierungen oder DE:244 oder DE:244.1 bicycle_road 

Eine Fahrradstraße ist eine für den Radverkehr vorgesehene Straße. Andere Fahrzeuge dürfen Fahrradstraßen nicht benutzen, es sei denn, dies ist durch Zusatzzeichen angezeigt. 

Voraussetzungen gemäß:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle_road%3Dyes
iudex_non_calculat (2024-02-22 12:57:33+00:00): Hallo pitfire,

es gibt jeweils Verkehrszeichen DE:244.1 mit Zusatzschild "Anlieger frei" und Piktogramme "Fahrradstraße" auf der Fahrbahn.
Map_HeRo (2025-08-22 16:47:58+00:00): Hallo ti_rey,

Du hast hier am Landecker diverse Wege nach DGM1 geändert, ohne auch mal einen Blick auf das absurde Tagging zu werfen, das vom User Biosphärenreservat Rhön stammt, wie bereits an anderer Stelle festgestellt.

Jeder darf natürlich das mappen, das ihm Spaß macht, aber es wäre schön, wenn Du Dir bei einer Bearbeitung die Zeit nehmen würdest, auch Fehler zu korrigieren und nicht nur ein bisschen Lagekosmetik zu betreiben. Ein korrektes Tagging der Wegeigenschaften ist auf jeden Fall wichtiger für die Nutzung der Informationen wichtiger als eine perfekte Lagegenauigkeit.

Da Du nach Deinen eigenen Angaben über das notwendige lokale Wissen verfügst und Deine Änderungen auch regelmäßig vor Ort überprüfst, sollte das korrekte Tagging dieser Wege für Dich doch ein Leichtes sein.

Gruß Mikke
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-05 19:50:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152303022, 152302989 where the changeset comment is: remove Istanbul bus route import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148103706
VLD549 (2024-03-26 17:29:27+00:00): Hi, could you provide a link that shows the name change from Grunselborrestraat to Huismanstraat?
I can't seem to verify it.
Thank you!
pi11 (2024-03-26 23:42:25+00:00): Dag Tom, bedankt voor je bericht. aangezien je volgens je profiel Nederlandstalig bent, zal ik in het Nederlands antwoorden.
Meerdere redenen voor de wijzigingen:
1. Primaire bron is GRB
2. Secundair geeft ook het adressenregister de straatnaam Huismanstraat.
3. Note #4121800
4. Er waren sowieso al enkele fouten (Sint-Leonardus  ipv het op Mapillary zichtbare Sint Leonardus) en heel rare dingen (de Sint Leonardus die kortstondig onderbroken wordt door Grunselborrestraat, om vervolgens opnieuw over te gaan in de Sint Leonardus), wat de kans dat de primaire straatnaam fout is ook verhoogt.  

Zou je willen zeggen over welke informatie je beschikt waarom dit deel toch Grunselborrestraat is?
VLD549 (2024-04-04 13:24:02+00:00): Thank you for the info.
TrickyFoxy (2024-02-23 20:21:46+00:00): И не удаляйте просто так объекты
TrickyFoxy (2024-02-23 20:22:12+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147833205
mavl (2024-03-26 15:37:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149183745 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15868].
phodgkin (2025-01-26 18:46:40+00:00): The gate on the tertiary road Apperley Road:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147752346#map=19/53.837415/-1.705963
looks a bit odd.

Could this have been a temporary closure? I didn't see anything when I passed on 25 Jan 2025 - clear way through to the A658 from the junction with Apperley Lane.
SomeoneElse (2025-01-26 18:52:59+00:00): Correct - there's no gate now.  There was about a year ago, when it was closed for flood defence works.  Someone spotted that the road had reopened about 3 months ago, and when I was there just before Christmas that bit of road was fully open (and the pub seemed to have had a much-needed lick of paint).  I've removed the gate.
robby_rumble (2024-05-14 16:35:52+00:00): Hi Nick, why is the service road on the west side of Lake Shore Drive between 15th and 18th marked as allowed_access=all? It is inside the railyard and next to active tracks.
nickvet419 (2024-05-14 23:53:26+00:00): must of missed adding the access to it, but I see you got it.
MrMoehritz (2024-02-25 20:37:39+00:00): Hi Sarafat,

thank you for your contribution. 

Unfortunately your crontibutions contain quite a substational amount of errors and inaccuracies. Here are some examples:

 - ships maped as buildings in the ocean ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1253426833 )

- oddly (wrongly) shaped buildings ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1253437543 )

- buildings that are correct but are now floating in the ocean because the island has grown since it was last mapped ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1253437536 )

- garden mapped as building ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1253437548 )

- field mapped as building (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1253426855 )

I can fix many of the issues that were created on these two islands.

Yet, I see that you are a power-mapper. I respekt the large effort you dedicate to OSM. But at the same time I would like to ask you to map more responsible.

Also the changes here seem to fall under the definition of data imports which should be handled with specific care: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines


Greetings and happy mapping

Mo
WWMapper101 (2025-02-04 13:45:23+00:00): Hej,

Vad innebär addr:housenumber:en som du lagt till på https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11650692203??
riiga (2025-02-04 13:52:53+00:00): Måste vara en miss av något slag. Fritt fram att rätta.
WWMapper101 (2025-02-04 16:37:40+00:00): Vad är den rätta adressen? 60 eller 61?
riiga (2025-02-04 16:50:37+00:00): 60 eftersom numret alldeles bredvid är 61...
kartograph (2024-12-28 19:03:51+00:00): Hi sundew :).

Warum hast du `operator:wikidata` von den Briefkästen entfernt?

Viele Grüße
nevw (2024-02-22 05:13:54+00:00): Adding tags that are unknown doesn’t add anything of value to the osm and I expect it is preferred not to add those.
@lakendrickriaquail (2024-02-22 00:00:51+00:00): Replace all " old_railway_operator: UP " with old_railway_operator: MP in states except Oregon and Washington
Tommybara (2024-02-22 05:48:55+00:00): Please do not add the postfix “City” to the name:en tag of Bà Rịa. According to the naming convention, city names all over the world in OSM simply include their name, without “City” in that name:en tag. For example, Hanoi (not Hanoi City), Đà Nẵng (not Đà Nẵng City), Seoul (not Seoul City), San Francisco (not San Francisco City). The exceptions would be when the word “City” is itself part of the name, like Salt Lake City, Kansas City, Jefferson City… You can add another tag, official_name:en and fill in "Ba Ria City" if you wish.

Thanks for your understanding.
goaned (2024-09-01 20:56:56+00:00): Hi, why did you do this? I don't think either of them are neighborhoods, they are apartment complexes. What should actually be added to them is residential=apartments.
Joseph R P (2024-02-23 19:11:11+00:00): Hello, I don't think that Cherry Hill Road should be a secondary route just because it is signed as a primary state route. While part of a state highway that is tagged as primary for the majority of its route, this small segment only serves as a collector road to access residential streets and business just off Route 29 rather than as an arterial or link between other secondary/primary routes.
WC392309 (2024-02-23 20:49:23+00:00): I would typically agree, however, the classifications say that a primary state highway is typically at least secondary. This road possibly could be an exception, but it's a collector to US-29
Joseph R P (2024-02-23 21:01:03+00:00): I have noted in the past that, at least when it comes to Virginia, state route numbers do not necessarily reflect the importance of the road but rather who it is maintained by. It is very common for primary state routes to be dead-end roads or minor collectors and for secondary routes to be trans-regional arteries. VA 204 and 347 in Westmoreland County are some examples I can think of off the top of my head.
Frans S (2024-03-04 12:02:59+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Oversized mapped.
Included yard in mapping
Not squared.
Tagged wrongly.  Buildings have to be tagged as building=yes.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147755065
Frans S (2024-03-25 17:24:42+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, you hardly squared a building.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147755089
Frans S (2024-03-03 11:36:35+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Tag buildings only as building=yes.
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared
collected buildings. Mapped as one.
Included yard in mapped buildings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147755187
Frans S (2024-03-25 16:46:15+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Not follow the outlines of a building
Not squared buildings.
Many buildings are that poor mapped that these need to be mapped from scratch.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147755196
Frans S (2024-03-02 15:03:58+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared
Connected buildings with their nodes


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147755323
Friendly_Ghost (2024-04-23 22:51:22+00:00): Hi. Where did you get this Urdu name from?
Patrickov (2024-02-26 03:55:33+00:00): The routing is very broken.  Please ensure the routing is complete before uploading.
Patrickov (2024-02-26 03:56:19+00:00): Also, iD *sucks* in editing bus routes.

I recommend you learn using JOSM, or ask one of those who knows how to do it (e.g. samho1234567 or me) to help out.  Thanks.
Kovoschiz (2024-02-26 05:31:56+00:00): https://mapping-bus-routes.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
https://osmand.net/blog/guideline-pt/
samho1234567 (2024-02-27 03:12:06+00:00): You may read the guidance by Patrickov.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Patrickov/diary/401869

You may take reference from Citybus bus route 79X. Notice that elements order of bus route: stop > platform > road

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16017005
samho1234567 (2024-02-27 13:45:39+00:00): I've completed routing of Citybus 78P. Remember that stops and platforms are required for routing.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147973877
Warin61 (2024-05-20 04:40:35+00:00): Hi,
Not a good idea to add the tree tag to a National Park... 
Not all the National Park is covered by trees leading some mappers to make holes where there are not tree .. thus making holes in the National Park
At d=some place the trees may extend beyond the National Park .. mappers then extend the National Park... 

Best? Make a new multipolygon relation for the trees... Can still have some extend the National Park where the outer ways are common to both tree are and Park area. 

I have added a crude tree relation for this area. Please make changes to suit. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17613045
NeisBot (2024-03-19 15:45:49+00:00): Hello diablo2041, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments \n
Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
KevinOs (2024-02-22 04:13:30+00:00): I might have jumped the gun a bit. Further research indicates changes come into effect Jan 1, 2025, Happy to revert if anyone has concerns?
Ewrt1 (2024-03-10 20:15:35+00:00): I'll revert plus add a proposed_name-2025 tag
joel56dt (2024-02-22 05:56:02+00:00): Hi Zarr, I just noticed one of the crossing you mapped looks like it is based on outdated imagery. It looks like the Esri World imagery is more up to date than the Bing imagery. I'm not good about checking this myself. I just wanted to identify it - hopefully it helps your mapping efforts. Thanks!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147758252
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-01 15:03:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1253476999/history - this is private hot tub, right?

Not accessible to general public or customers of some object?
LordGarySugar (2024-02-22 20:50:26+00:00): Still capacity=1?
Matt_ (2024-02-22 04:56:06+00:00): Wrong changeset description. Just connecting waterways.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-02-22 11:56:26+00:00): #图为时而绘
okadatsuneo (2024-02-22 07:35:15+00:00): source=いちき串木野市 が正しい
mcliquid (2024-02-28 10:11:14+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
mini-me (2024-03-05 23:06:58+00:00): Пожалуйста, используйте name:ru:word_stress для названий с ударениями
Warin61 (2024-02-22 22:28:54+00:00): ????? 
This looks to have made open roads back to construction ... see Way: Sydney Gateway (39749554)

And possibly deleted roads in existence?
Warin61 (2024-02-23 21:53:41+00:00): Repaired bus route terminal transfer to your ways .. I have noted that imagery does not support these changes (as yet).
PPete2 (2024-03-09 13:01:02+00:00): Hallo Nikolaus,
du hast hier die Wiener Bezirke als "subarea" der Wiener Gemeindegrenze hinzugefügt. Das selbe gilt auch für Linz.
Dies ist nicht nur in Österreich unüblich, sondern laut englischer Wiki "disputed" (umstritten), und in der deutschen Wiki wird es gar nicht erwähnt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:boundary

Ich bitte dich diese entweder wieder aus der Relation zu löschen, oder dies vorher im österreichischen Forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/at/59 zu diskutieren, danke.

Stadtbezirke eh sind bereits als eigene Grenzrelationen und falls gleichnamig auch als place-Nodes vorhanden.
pitfire (2024-02-22 11:29:55+00:00): Hallo Klöver,

(...Feldweg nicht für Motorfahrzeuge befahrbar )
Ist es deine Meinung, oder so beschildert? 
access=no bedeutet:
Kein Zugang für die breite Öffentlichkeit (Benutzung nicht erlaubt.) Stärkeres Verbot als private.
Siehe dazu"Abgrenzungshilfe" unter

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=track?uselang=de#Abgrenzung_zu_highway=unclassified
user_21033122 (2024-02-22 14:02:26+00:00): Hallo pitfire, 
eine offizielle Beschilderung besteht nicht, allerdings ist der Weg am oberen Ende mit einem Poller versperrt und dadurch eigentlich nur für Radfahrer und Fußgänger geeignet. Für Motorräder ist der Untergrund zu schlecht. Vielleicht etwas missverständlich formuliert von mir, gemeint ist öffentlicher MIV, landwirtschaftliche Fahrzeuge benutzen diesen Weg u.U. durchaus.
YomanNH (2024-03-21 09:03:35+00:00): Cześć,
droga dla rowerów połączona razem z chodnikiem to jest highway=path + foot=designated + bicycle designated, a nie osobny chodnik i osobna droga dla rowerów. Osobne mapowanie, jeśli nic nie rozdziela chodnika i DDR jest błędem.

Dodatkowo footway=sidewalk to chodnik wzdłuż drogi, a nie każdy możliwy chodnik.
Marek-M (2024-03-08 12:19:26+00:00): Cześć, zamknąłeś tą drogę dla ruchu ale od strony nowego ronda nie ma zakazu ruchu i zgodnie z przepisami prawa można na nią wjechać. Zakaz ruchu na Bigusa jest ustawiony tylko od strony ul. Gdyńskiej (DK20). Poprawię ten przejazd i ewentualnie ustawię niższą kategorię drogi, bo faktycznie w tym momencie jest to max highway=service.
Artur | Yanosik (2024-03-08 13:41:00+00:00): Dziękuję za korektę i wprowadzenie zakazów skrętu na Gdyńskiej.
michael60634 (2024-03-18 05:39:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in full.
michael60634 (2024-03-18 05:39:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in full.
michael60634 (2024-03-18 05:39:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in full.
michael60634 (2024-03-18 05:39:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in full.
tekim (2024-04-23 20:15:00+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150414361
VLD515 (2024-04-29 02:21:02+00:00): This is acknowledged that the utility of Waze as a source of truth is not allowed for any editing purpose in OSM.
tekim (2024-04-23 20:14:29+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150414339
VLD515 (2024-04-29 02:21:49+00:00): This is acknowledged that the utility of Waze as a source of truth is not allowed for any editing purpose in OSM.
mavl (2024-02-23 18:52:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147818131, 147828921 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
Warin61 (2024-02-28 07:45:36+00:00): Hi,
You have quite a few bus relations that don't meet PTv2 requirements. 

Before you enter more of them, how about fixing the ones you have entered? Hopefully learning how to get them correct before uploading them to OSM? 

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=151.29722&lat=-33.82313&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
Soshal Distan Singh (2024-02-29 22:08:35+00:00): Добрый день. Не забывайте про пробелы в номерах домов. Пожалуйста, изучите: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Адреса#Нумерация_домов
totera (2024-08-08 22:35:48+00:00): Anche qui hai inserito la fermata sbagliata all'interno dell'autostazione di Ascoli.
Davvero io credo che potresti contribuire in maniera più utile a OpenStreetMap mappando ciò che conosci direttamente.
eserte (2024-02-23 19:00:26+00:00): Hallo!
Im Beitrag steht nur, dass der Poller entfernt werden soll. Aber ist es auch tatsächlich passiert?
WhoDeletedMyCookies (2024-02-23 19:56:01+00:00): Hi! Ja, der Poller ist definitiv weg, ich fahre da 2x am Tag durch. Der Bezirk hat es leider eine ganze Weile verschleppt, nun sind aber Schilder und Durchfahrtsbeschränkung abgebaut.
eserte (2024-02-24 09:39:49+00:00): Da sind noch drei offene osm-Notizen an dieser Stelle. Vermutlich können diese alle geschlossen werden?