piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Michi_10 (2026-04-02 12:40:25+00:00): Hi,
danke für deine Rückmeldung. Ich hatte es als highway=secondary getaggt, da die Straße Teil der L 380 ist. Dann scheint ref=L 380 zu genügen. Ich habe den ursprünglichen Zustand nun wiederhergestellt.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2026-04-02 16:35:20+00:00): Hallo,
danke dir.
Landesstraßen können zwar secondary sein, in so einem Fall, wo nur Anliegerverkehr zugelassen sind, passt das dann mal nicht.
Viele Grüße
NeisRevert (2026-04-02 06:41:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/180751782
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
CasonC (2026-03-31 19:18:52+00:00): if someone could help me make it look nicer that would be awesome I cant seem to make it look good...
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 22:33:23+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
5m4u9 (2026-04-01 00:20:55+00:00): Hola, gracias por añadir estas áreas naturales en Sucre.

Siempre es preferible no unir el area natural y las calles. Hay una opción en la barra de la derecha para "ocultar" otros elementos que no son parte de lo que etas dibujando.

hay algunas partes (centro), donde hay viviendas y está depredado y ya no es matorral...
rempshaener (2026-04-01 18:06:57+00:00): Hallo,
der Weg ist nur in eine Richtung mit dem Vz 237 beschildert.
D.h. in Richtung forward gilt bicycle:forward, es ist aber kein cycleway, da in Gegenrichtung Fußgänger zugelassen sind.
Das Tagging ist jetzt falsch.
Bitte stelle den vorherigen Zustand wieder her.
Viele Grüße
Michi_10 (2026-04-02 12:46:56+00:00): Hi,
danke für deine Rückmeldung. Ich habe auch hier den ursprünglichen Zustand nun wiederhergestellt.
Viele Grüße
eggie (2026-03-31 20:07:19+00:00): Hoi,

Op een footway hoeft geen foot=designated, horse=no en motor_vehicle=no  Dat is default.
MVG
eggie
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 22:33:25+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
HellMap (2026-05-04 23:32:01+00:00): Čau vēlreiz, nezinu kā SC šo tulkojumā piedāvā, bet laikam nepareizi, jo šeit nebūs "gar ielu" parking=street_side.
rusjanis (2026-05-05 03:50:17+00:00): Jā, kļūdījos, vari pielabot?
HellMap (2026-05-05 12:20:55+00:00): Sāku labot un atradās daudz kur vēl piemēri. ;) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182245179

Es nezinu vai tas ir SC tulkojums slikts vai arī tu ne gluži korekti to lietoji. Īsumā - street_side nozīmē, ka parkošanās ir gar publisku ielu izdalītās "kabatiņās". Ja ir jānobrauc no ielas un jāiebrauc kaut kādā citā ceļā, laukumā, teritorijāutt. tad tas vairs nav uz ielas.

Secīgi strupceļos, necaurbraucamos pagalmos, DUS, automazgātavās, veikalu stāvvietās, privātās teritorijās, P zonās, utt. parasti nav street_side, bet vienkārši surface. Tādās vietās tā parkošanās var izskatīties ļoti līdzīgi ielas stāvvietām, bet pēc funkcijas OSM tie vairs nebūs. Jo doma ir - tu brauc pa publisku ielu, un uzreiz iebrauc gar ielu nodalītā parkošanās vietā, tad izbrauc ārā un brauc tālāk bez nekādiem pagalmiem, papildus ceļiem, ietvēm, iebrauktuvēm, utt.

Es gan piebildīšu, ka ir daudz piemēru, kur varētu diskutēt, kas tieši tur ir, īpaši visādos pagalmos. Es arī drošvien ne visur pareizi esmu salicis.
rusjanis (2026-05-06 08:04:15+00:00): Nu jā tev taisnība ,😅, SC tulkojums street_side varbūt īsti neatbilst šim nolūkam. Turpmāk zināšu. Paldies!
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 22:33:27+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 22:33:28+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
ivanbranco (2026-05-07 13:14:24+00:00): Ciao demon_box,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1494723546

qualcosa deve essere andato storto qua, riesci a dargli un'occhiata?

grazie per gli edit e buon mapping!
demon_box (2026-05-07 13:31:49+00:00): Ciao ivanbranco, eh già grazie 1000 che mi hai intercettato l'errore!
Molto banalmente in Josm il completamento automatico in base agli ultimi tags utilizzati (unito alla fretta...) mi ha creato 1 palese errore di battitura e quello che doveva essere "building=yes" è diventato "barrier=y".....
Sistemato, grazie ancora davvero!
BuonMapping!
eggie (2026-03-31 20:22:44+00:00): Dag Xylene...  Wanneer je parallelvoetpaden gaat intekenen routeert het al snel niet meer, want je krijg enorme omwegen.
Dat komt omdat verbindingen ontbreken.
Gebruikelijk is om de parallelpaden op te nemen in de tagging van de hoofdrijbaan met sidewalk=right left of both.
Consensus is er niet, maar houdt er dan rekening mee dat je voldoende verbindingen maakt om bv een straat over te steken.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-31 20:25:37+00:00): De brug heb ik aangepast met een vlak man_made=bridge layer=1  anders zie je twee bruggen. 
mapse
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 22:33:30+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
NeisBot (2026-03-31 19:42:50+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 31 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1483877124 v2 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1494727862 v1 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1483877110 v2 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180689622
NeisReview (2026-04-08 22:33:12+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180690923
https://osm.org/changeset/180739678
weblogdryads (2026-04-01 22:00:48+00:00): Hello! Welcome to OSM! A good tip is if you want to make buildings looks nice and have squared edges, click on the building and press the Q key
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 22:33:32+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
eggie (2026-04-01 14:43:23+00:00): Wellicht voor hulpdiensten: duikteam Brandweer? 
Gr eggie
molensteen (2026-04-04 20:02:38+00:00): Dank eggie, daar had ik niet aan gedacht
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-01 06:07:11+00:00): Partly revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180522829
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-01 06:09:23+00:00): Hallo,

bitte beim nächsten Mal vielleicht 
einen etwas ausagekräftigern Kommentar bei dem Changeset nutzen. Nur mit einem "x" ist es eigentlich unmöglich eine Idee zu bekommen, was hier gemappt oder in diesem Fall gelöscht wurde ...

Danke und viele Grüße
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 22:33:34+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 22:33:36+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
eggie (2026-04-01 05:40:56+00:00): Dag nicotro..  Tag svp bij op de bestaande adresnodes. Ik heb de info samengevoegd.

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2026-03-31 20:27:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13539170201 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Social Club"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-08 22:33:10+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181071861
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
felipeeugenio (2026-03-31 20:35:02+00:00): Amco?

no es Aramco? está bien?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180691062
VicenteBarraFM (2026-03-31 20:50:23+00:00): Hola. Sí, es "Amco", el nombre es parecido, pero son diferentes, aunque la verdad no sé si existirá otra con este nombre jeje. Esta tiene el logo como de una hoja de árbol. 

Igualmente, por si las dudas también lo puedes corroborar en la web de Bencina en Línea (https://www.bencinaenlinea.cl/#/busqueda_estaciones)
felipeeugenio (2026-03-31 21:16:52+00:00): vale, gracias
lyctkel (2026-04-25 17:41:35+00:00): Hi juni_vv,
Zijn er werkzaamheden aan de Van de Leckestraat gepland? Op dit moment wordt er niet aan de weg gewerkt en is deze berijdbaar. Zie ook de foto’s van note 4996360.
Groet,
lyctkel
juni_vv (2026-04-25 17:50:58+00:00): Deze had ik toegevoegd als construction, een aantal weken geleden was deze weg afgesloten ivm de sloopwerkzaamheden. Deze zijn dan inmiddels weer verwijderd! Ik heb de weg weer aangepast, bedankt!

Groetjes,
Juniper
lyctkel (2026-04-25 19:33:56+00:00): Bedankt Juniper,
Groetjes,
lyctkel
Udarian (2026-03-31 21:17:42+00:00): Does this mean that this DDI will open soon?

Happy mapping,
Udar.
FDOT_Ryan (2026-03-31 21:22:48+00:00): Was scheduled for 3/27 but now possibly 4/13 or so. We will get official word here at FDOT soon after a few adjustments are made at the DDI.
Udarian (2026-03-31 21:23:25+00:00): thanks
Udarian (2026-03-31 21:36:04+00:00): Also does Northwest 170th street continue as dual carriageway further down than I currently have it as (like to Northwest 102nd avenue or even Northwest 96th avenue), or does the dual carriageway end roughly where I currently have it. I ask because while some of the details at this interchange are on the latest imagery I know of in the area, Northwest 170th street past a certain point is not very well defined on the latest imagery. I plan to go through an fix everything up to the best of my ability later in the year if Miami Dade releases new aerial imagery for 2026, but that is usually latter in the year. 
Also, just as a FYI, the latest imagery in Miami Dade County available in iD is the "Esri World Imagery" not the Bing.
FDOT_Ryan (2026-03-31 21:44:15+00:00): I have KMZ files for the whole interchange but the east side ends at 25.9277345,-80.3713149 so not 100% at this time.
Udarian (2026-03-31 21:50:14+00:00): Thanks, I'll wait and fix things once (and if) imagery comes out for 2026.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
FDOT_Ryan (2026-04-13 20:56:30+00:00): The DDI will be opening on April 21st confirmed today by Turnpike Leadership.
Udarian (2026-04-15 02:21:30+00:00): Ok then, unless you would prefer to change all of these construction ways to not be construction any longer, on April 21st I would be fine doing it my self. To do this properly I have two further questions:

 1. if you can get me a time (ex April 21 2 pm) it would be very useful, other wise I will do the change at like 8 or 9 pm to make it less likely that I accidentally mark it as not under construction when it has technically opened yet.
 2. does the ramp from  Northwest 107th Avenue to HEFT North (ex https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1186089416 ) open on the same date as the rest o the DDI or at a different time.

If you don't respond that you would prefer to do it yourself that day I will assume you'd prefer that I do it my self. 

If the date changes again, please let me know so that I don't make any incorrect edits.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
Udarian (2026-04-15 02:24:11+00:00): I still plan to do an alignment pass once the new 2026 imagery comes out whether or not I am the one that marks these as no longer under construction on April 21st.
FDOT_Ryan (2026-04-17 21:29:37+00:00): Just received the following from FL Turnpike.

"We are confirmed to open the new NW 170th Street Interchange on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @ 10am."
Udarian (2026-04-17 22:07:06+00:00): thanks for the time, I'll take that to mean that the does the ramp from Northwest 107th Avenue to HEFT North at the same time as the rest of the DDI. I'll put in the changeset to mark all of these as no longer under construction shortly after 10:00am. 

Happy mapping,
Udar.
FDOT_Ryan (2026-04-17 22:12:45+00:00): From my understanding that is correct.
Udarian (2026-04-21 14:22:45+00:00): OK, I marked all the relevant roads as no longer under construction. If you want to feel free to review my changes, this was done in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181630211 .

Happy mapping,
Udar.
maro21 (2026-03-31 22:02:15+00:00): Skąd pochodzą te dane o nawierzchni, które wprowadzasz? Byłeś w tych wszystkich miejscach?
Co to za program Asfalt_Premium?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-01 02:21:52+00:00): Hej, czy te twoje edycje są na podstawie wizyty w terenie?

Czy na podstawie czegoś innego?
b-jazz (2026-04-01 23:40:36+00:00): When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. Take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Golf.png for an example of the "Wrong" way to map a fairway and a green, along with the correct way. There are some cases where a fringe exists around a green and you should draw the fairway outline completely around a green, leaving room for the fringe. Other times, the fairway and green butt up against each other. In that case the fairway and green should share the same nodes at the boundary between the two, and every node at the boundary needs to be shared, leaving no gaps. When drawing these shared nodes, editors like iD (built into openstreetmap.org) will "snap" to an existing node if you get close enough. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out. Thanks.

(You actually had correctly drawn holes in the area before, but you removed them and made them incorrect this time. I don't understand. Could you please fix them up? Thanks.)
MxxCon (2026-04-01 00:00:58+00:00): Hello.
What is the source of this information?
eerib (2026-04-01 01:46:26+00:00): Reverted - Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180698190
Binzy_Boi (2026-04-02 06:48:26+00:00): Hey!

Sorry for the comment on the edit, but I was curious if you knew if the bottle depot took up the whole building, as I was wondering if I should mark the building as the Bottle Depot and transfer the node's information from there.
Bruce_Wayne_Firefighter (2026-04-02 12:37:30+00:00): It does not take up the whole building. The north part of the building is a marijuana store, the south part is a plumbing warehouse
Binzy_Boi (2026-04-06 05:37:12+00:00): Thanks!
GinaroZ (2026-03-31 23:08:27+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. I'm assuming that the smoothness=intermediate tag is now outdated and it is likely to be excellent?
AlanCampbell (2026-03-31 23:15:54+00:00): Yes, that's correct, thanks for pointing that out. I've made an update to reflect this.
Frans S (2026-04-01 08:27:44+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please square each building you map with the Q key while selected.
65 out of 72 buildings you mapped are not squared !!
Best regards and keep mapping
iandees (2026-03-31 23:07:22+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6153556743 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180695575, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Orblivion (2026-04-01 21:11:14+00:00): Did you mean to mark way 1494781313 as "building:terraced"? You marked the other buildings as "building:terrace".
Norbert Dichter (2026-04-01 15:09:39+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180694393
Norbert Dichter (2026-04-01 15:09:19+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180694408
Norbert Dichter (2026-04-01 15:09:06+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180694448
Norbert Dichter (2026-04-01 15:08:50+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180694523
NeisBot (2026-03-31 22:33:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1494783478 v1 | 12 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180694629