piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2026-07-17 07:10:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1388318679#map=17/51.106995/5.864114&layers=N

Bij een zoekslag
De Pannenfabriek Echt (2026-07-17 08:18:56+00:00): Ja nu is De Pannenfabriek enkel 1 van de gebouwen die erbij horen, liefst heb ik dat de POI alle gebouwen is zoals ik had aangegeven, die liggen allemaal rondom Plein de Valk, vandaar dat ik dat had aangegeven zonder huisnummer..
eggie (2026-07-17 19:03:38+00:00): Toch een lastige.
Soms kun je meer gebouwen in een relatie leggen.
De bedoeling is dat de naam maar 1x rendert.
Het bewuste adres ligt ergens anders.
Je zou het even op het forum van osm kunnen vragen.
Draadje korte vragen korte antwoorden.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/
Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-07-17 19:08:14+00:00): Je zou ook een transparant vlak kunnen intekenen met landuse=retail
name= De Pannenfabriek. Dan staat de naam op het vlak.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=retail
user_5359 (2026-07-16 06:33:28+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413996879. What is the mean of the tag maximum_current = 2400. Did you mean railway: maximum_current?
Ruben Van de Velde (2026-07-16 07:47:01+00:00): Thanks, fixed
sembelst134 (2026-07-22 08:01:02+00:00): Hallo, du warst letzten scheinbar bei note/5301416 unterwegs.
Wie schon vermutet scheinen dort ja keine designated Schilder stehen, so wie es von dir angepasst wurde.
Kannst du dich noch an way/310679243 erinnern, dass man den Hinweis schließen kann?
PS: Wenn möglich, nicht zwangsläufig die Tags wie bicycle=yes setzen, da es ja standardmäßig impliziert ist. Besser ausschließlich bei sowas wie traffic_sign=DE:1022-10 verwenden
maro21 (2026-07-18 23:25:46+00:00): access = permit oznacza, że każdy może wjechać, tylko musi poprosić strażnika o zgodę/przepustkę. Czy tak jest tutaj? Wartość permit jest bardzo rzadko używana, raczej powinno być private.
t_ja (2026-07-14 19:26:59+00:00): Ahoj,
prosim o dostudovanie si OSM Wiki ohladom tagovania budov, aby nedochadzalo k takym upravam, ako pozorujem v poslednom case:
- zmena building=apartments (t.j. bytovka) na building=yes (co znamena vseobecna budova bez blizsieho urcenia), napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1533870470/history a https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1533870472/history. Dokonca pri https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1533870471/history si sice pridal adresu, ale zmazal typ budovy uplne, takze sa uz ani nezobrazuje na mape ☹️
- zmena building=detached (t.j. rodinny dom) na building=yes, pripadne building=house (co je "nejaky" dom). Tak building=house sa pouziva len v pripade, ze sa jedna o radovu zastavbu, ale vtedy k nemu este treba pridat house=terraced. 
A este by som chcel poprosit spajat viacere zmeny (napr. upravy viacerych budov v jednom meste/obci) do jednej sady zmien. Je zbytocne kazdu jednu budovu upravovat v separatnej sade zmien...

Vopred vdaka.
eggie (2026-07-14 14:43:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Er is hier al een adresnode.
Je hoeft dus niet nogmaals een adres toe te voegen. Ik zal het weer verwijderen.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
divaddivag (2026-07-23 09:34:26+00:00): Bonjour Mark, je n'ai pas trouvé cette boîte à livres: node/14014593908 . N'aurais-tu pas confondu avec celle placée sous le porche voisin: node/7491948550 ? Bien à toi, David
Mark SAINT (2026-07-23 21:07:51+00:00): Oui, j’ai dû aller un peu vite, et je me suis effectivement trompé de porche. J’en suis tout penaud.
Qui doit procéder à la modification ?
Je ne pourrai pas avant quelques jours.
Encore désolé,
Mark
divaddivag (2026-07-24 04:22:49+00:00): Merci pour ton retour express. Il n'y pas de soucis cela peut arriver, je vais m'en occuper. J'ai mis en place une carte umap pour suivre et complémenter les BaL sur le département (https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/boite-a-livres-ov-14_1341726) avec la notamment la clé check_date pour évaluer la fraîcheur de l'information. Tout est synchronisé avec le site: https://www.boites-a-livres.fr, et donc envoyer ses observations, photos incluses, est aussi une alternative pour contribuer sur ce thème! Bonne journée David
Mark SAINT (2026-07-24 09:36:59+00:00): C’est moi qui vous remercie : le sujet m’intéresse, je suis plutôt sur l’Orne, et j’essaie de renseigner la carte au gré de mes petits voyages. Mais surtout, néophyte sur OSM, vous m’ouvrez des perspectives sur des possibilités que j’ignorais. Je verrai cela en septembre.
Bonne journée !
Mark
pnorman (2026-07-14 19:37:43+00:00): This way looks like it's just a break in the fence between directions. Are you sure it's usable by normal vehicles? Right now it's implied as oneway so only northbound traffic can use it. Is that accurate?

Frequently connections like this one are access=no or designated for emergency vehicles only.
Nirmala03 (2026-07-16 14:17:53+00:00): Hi pnorman,
As per feedback and OSM guidelines reverting the edits. Please note regarding the community consultations, we are currently working on them internally and will not be making any further edits until the process is complete
⇄ john paul jones & gringo (2026-07-21 23:29:41+00:00): Regarding the wikidata id, I think this maybe run by North Norfolk District Council; https://www.north-norfolk.gov.uk/tasks/your-community/view-public-toilets/ 
= Q73072695 
and not the parish council. Happisburgh Cart Gap NR12 0QL 
I might be wrong of course, just asking Robert
Robert Whittaker (2026-07-22 07:49:16+00:00): No, the Happisburgh Cart Gap toilets are these ones: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/132155794 further along the coast.
⇄ john paul jones & gringo (2026-07-24 08:29:37+00:00): Arh good, thank you for your response
pnorman (2026-07-14 13:54:35+00:00): Hello,

this edit looks like it's part of an organized edit. Is that correct? If it is, can you provide a link to the organized edit page for it on the OSM wiki?

Thanks
Vandana@28 (2026-07-14 15:17:38+00:00): Hi norman,
Thank you for your feedback. I sincerely apologize for my mistake. I initially marked the road as two-way based on our internal GPS data. However, after verifying the road alignment, I realized it is actually one-way, and I have reverted the edit.

I truly appreciate your feedback, and I will be much more careful in the future before uploading any edits. Please also find the relevant OSM wiki for reference. Link:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uber_Road_Geometry,_Turn_restrictions,_Directionality_%26_Lane_connectivity_Improvements
pnorman (2026-07-14 19:32:56+00:00): The link you gave me says that the community consultation for that proposed organized edit has not yet happened and "no editing will be performed under this activity until the relevant community consultation has taken place."

Please hold off doing any more of this organized edit until the consultation has been finished, or if it is just a documentation error, the wiki page has been updated.
nerihv (2026-07-26 03:12:38+00:00): mapeado con esri 2025
desplazamiento -3.87, 1.17
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185717676
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-14 16:25:05+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM.

Der hinzugefügte Name sieht etwas seltsam aus:
nördl. seite 6m20cm (1539055391), v1
Wanderer2000 (2026-07-14 14:53:27+00:00): Hi Taurus, 
Is dit wel een fietspad? De bewoners van huisnummer 4 kunnen zo niet meer bij hun oprit komen met de auto.
Groetjes Wanderer
Taurus3 (2026-07-14 18:20:20+00:00): Hoi Wanderer, scherpe observatie, bedankt voor je aanvulling. Ik heb het aangepast.
Wanderer2000 (2026-07-14 20:03:40+00:00): Ik ga nog even kritisch zijn. Ik snap het idee om het laatste wegsegment met het paaltje als fietspad te mappen. Maar als er geen beperkingen zijn zoals een bordje fietspad, mogen motoren, brommer, paarden etc. hier gewoon langs. met highway=cycleway zal de router deze groepen hier niet doorheen laten. 
Ik stel voor om de weg weer terug te zetten naar residential. Het paaltje zorgt er immers al voor dat auto's hier niet langs worden gerouteerd.
Taurus3 (2026-07-15 06:44:08+00:00): Mijn suggestie voor fietspad heb ik gedaan vanwege de smalle breedte van het pad, op het laatste deel past geen auto
hlfan (2026-07-27 05:32:10+00:00): Die können sich wohl auch nicht entscheiden, ob sie das Gleis gerade haben wollen oder nicht: https://mapillary.com/app?pKey=1063347549710967&focus=photo
Dimitar155 (2026-07-30 18:35:10+00:00): Thanks once again for your changes! Just avoid gluing area features to linear features like parking lots to nearby roads.
AnnaCatarina (2026-07-31 10:22:05+00:00): Hello Dimitar,
thanks. I am commonly separating areas and linears, even there is a lot to do with this to divide structures from old edits.
In cases of parking lots next to roads, esp. if it is street-side perpendicular, diagonal or parallel parking, it does make sense to "glue" it for navigation reasons.
Which precise situation where does make trouble?
Regards,
Anna Catarina
Dimitar155 (2026-07-31 10:44:42+00:00): The comment is related to way/1539064222.

In general, gluing any area feature to linear feature (with the exceptions of fences, kerbs and a few others) makes the data harder to edit in the future. Imagine if this street side parking expanded to the east and west. You would have to move its nodes and keep the road straight at the same time.

I think that most navigation software  are able to find nearby parking lots even if they aren't connected to linear roads. From there the driver is able to navigate near it which should be more than enough.

Also, looking at the wiki for parking=street_side, all examples are not glued to linear roadways, but some are glued to area:highway=* features (such objects are not present in this village). It is not explicitly written though.
AnnaCatarina (2026-07-31 10:55:56+00:00): O.k., Dimitar, thanks for the precise example. Even the mentioned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Parking-street-side-with-areahighway.png does not show any linear features at all and therefor is not really comparable, I am going to avoid "glueing" street-side parkings to the road in BG in the future.
Regards,
Anna Catarina
GA_Kevin (2026-07-15 13:20:56+00:00): Hey Cuda! Thanks for contributing to Brevard County mapping! Im glad youre here! Ive gone ahead and added all the addresses I have for Strom Park to hopefully make it easier if you want to continue tracing buildings!

I, as well as a lot of other mappers in the US are always available on our Slack, we'd love to see you join and hang out! https://openstreetmap.us/get-involved/slack/

Happy Mapping! -- GA_Kevin
csirolli (2026-07-14 14:16:48+00:00): *compatibility
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-14 15:17:41+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM.

Thanks for adding the RiverStation address and the Moline Regional Community Foundation. One important issue: Visit Quad Cities was added to a node that is part of the building outline, and it has only a name tag. Please remove the name from that building corner and create a separate POI inside the building, ideally tagged tourism=information, information=office, with Suite 110 and its contact details. The foundation’s description should also be shortened because it currently reads as promotional copy. No full revert is necessary.

Thanks!
MediaLinkInc (2026-07-14 15:28:23+00:00): Removed the Visit Quad Cities tag at building outline and shortened description. Visit Quad Cities not added due to time constraint.
eggie (2026-07-14 14:46:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-14 14:53:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnod. Eén vermelding van de sportclub is voldoende. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-14 14:58:04+00:00): Tip Veranderingen zegt niemand iets..  Geef svp concreet commentaar.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-14 14:56:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
evgenykatyshev (2026-07-14 18:56:08+00:00): Please don't put such a description to the name tag. Name is only for proper name.
rajdhani (2026-07-16 11:05:03+00:00): Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185838778
Jenessian (2026-07-17 09:43:50+00:00): Can you please help me undo my inaccurate changesets? i can’t undo them: 185772403, 185768975, 185762744, 185757891, 185722337, 185703730, 185701260
balint36 (2026-07-24 23:49:01+00:00): 136?
balint36 (2026-07-25 00:04:36+00:00): Látom már. Akkor vissza kell állítanom az eredeti címkére, mert az OSM wiki szerint nem az a main, amire te gondolsz.
balint36 (2026-07-25 00:06:52+00:00): Itt is igaz, amit a 136-ra írtam.
woodpeck (2026-07-14 15:12:40+00:00): Instead of deleting and re-creating boundaries, try to improve their geometry (thereby keeping the history). The JOSM editor has a tool that allows you to refine or move existing geometries quickly.
Supaplex (2026-07-15 04:07:13+00:00): I have revert the changeset. I am working on using the newest boundary after 2018. Still work in progress, please be paient about it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185722926
Piskvor (2026-07-14 16:40:39+00:00): revertnuto v https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185728819#map=13/50.06580/14.44957 

Nespravuje ŘSD, není silnice první třídy, ale specifický typ "místní komunikace", ale přesto číslovaná jako 8
uprkos (2026-07-14 19:33:09+00:00): Hi, 
Thank you for updating the POIs in Krakow, this is much needed!

Minor remark - please make sure the names are maintained in line with the rules: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

1. Name is a name only - a generic identifier like 'Kancelaria Prawna' or 'Komis' are not proper names and shouldn't be part of the name. If the place doesn't have a proper name, we tag it as name:signed=no.
In case you are not a Polish speaker and are unsure whether something is a proper name or not - that's fine, but good to avoid whenever possible.

2. Capitilized letters - we use capital letters in the proper names (regardless of how it's written onsite) so e.g. Tutti Tours, Charlotta Bridal Aterlier etc.

These are cosmetic things but help keep the map clean.
Thank you!
PolskiPunkty (2026-07-14 21:53:54+00:00): Hey, thank you for the nice introduction and heads up.

I addressed the changes. I apparently skipped over the capitalization section, still used to in-place is correct from all the branding rules haha.

Might I ask one thing of you?
I'd like to verify "Kancelaria Prawna" tomorrow anyway, was a quick edit and might not exist.
-> Due to tagging being unclear here for me, in case I don't end up deleting it anyway, could I leave the tagging to you possibly?
-> I would upload a note with a picture of the individual nameplates and supporting information.

I have to agree the POI situation here is outdated and unfinished often. I'm happy to help :) Thank you again
uprkos (2026-07-15 19:40:15+00:00): Hi, sure, that works! Whenever you are not sure, you may create a note with a photo, then me or any other mapper would be happy to determine the POI type and update.
Piskvor (2026-07-14 16:40:34+00:00): revertnuto v https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185728819#map=13/50.06580/14.44957 

Nespravuje ŘSD, není silnice první třídy, ale specifický typ "místní komunikace", ale přesto číslovaná jako 8
Andrew Chadwick (2026-07-15 13:56:56+00:00): thanks! I'll close https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5395310
rarad74 (2026-07-14 18:25:34+00:00): Salut. Poate ne explici si noua mai detaliat ce inseamna "update" la atatea elemente deodata....
Colbertson (2026-07-14 20:01:59+00:00): Looks good
Only small nitpick is that it was slightly out of square (press Q to fix that). I fixed that and also added hoops=2
Would be nice to have surface= info and add the path leading to it and maybe benches or whatever else is around
foreigner037 (2026-07-27 13:20:30+00:00): Здравей,

тук най-правилно е да се ползва primary_link
literan (2026-07-14 18:46:15+00:00): Нотариус это не имя. У нотариуса есть имя обычно, так же как и вас зовут не Человек, а как-то по-другому.
AlekI4 (2026-07-14 20:55:05+00:00): В OrganicMap нет категории "нотариус". Вывеска на здании - "нотариус", поэтому правка показалась уместной.

 Зачастую "имя" = "name". Во многих open source приложениях из-за не корректного перевода не всегда очевидно: имеется ввиду имя человека или организации. Посему была допущена такая оплошность.
literan (2026-07-15 10:49:41+00:00): да, ничего страшного. я уже внес корректные фамилии нотариусов
taitan97 (2026-07-16 03:39:21+00:00): cái này mới đúng nè ad, ad updates lại
https://www.facebook.com/PHUONG.ANPHUDONG/posts/pfbid02ePBhoGXLxUAbrF7JWzgCsdQvg1beEpJKoes8nD2XU2P5ZCbwqbHsjSUgbitSxHo2l
dav23r (2026-07-14 15:53:12+00:00): The title should be understood as: I reverted the changeset  in revert:id because it (the author) <title>
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-14 16:28:43+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the added name real?
ELGO OUS 250 (12486803886), v2

Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-14 16:25:26+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM.

Der hinzugefügte Name sieht etwas seltsam aus: linkeste grasfläche (1539094876), v1
Dodko (2026-07-21 09:57:05+00:00): Adresa sa nedáva do POI ak už je na budove, ale pridajte si otvárací čas a kontakt.
Pomôcka je https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
Marek-M (2026-07-16 12:08:51+00:00): Cześć, czy tam jest zakaz jazdy rowerem? Takie zakazy rzadko spotyka w polskich lasach.
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-14 16:26:11+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM.

Für was ist diese Beschreibung gedacht?
nördl. seite 6m30, rechts 5m40, links 27m80, südl. seite 6m30Gesamt;445m80cm (1539055391), v2
Jonas Avianus (2026-07-15 08:26:06+00:00): Hallo,

ja ich verwende OSM um ein GaLaBau Bauvorhaben zu planen. vielleicht wäre da eine andere Software passender. Falls Sie einen Vorschlag haben :)

Beste Grüße
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-15 09:01:20+00:00): Hallo, 
es ist Ihnen schon bekannt und bewusst, dass Sie hier auf der OSM Produktions-Datenbank "planen" und das alle Ihre Änderungen in der Produktions-Karte live dargestellt und weltweit verteilt werden?

Ich sollte Ihnen daher mitteilen, dass Sie am besten schnellstmöglich alle Ihre Änderungen zurücksetzen.

Danke.
woodpeck (2026-07-15 09:50:44+00:00): Die Webseite umap.openstreetmap.de bietet die Möglichkeit, private Zeichungen auf einem OSM-Hintergrund anzufertigen.
eggie (2026-07-14 17:20:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback..  Probeer als het kan op de adresnode bij te taggen. Ik heb wat samengevoegd. Dan is het adres ook compleet.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
literan (2026-07-18 08:58:38+00:00): название маршрута вы убрали, а названия улиц остались потеряны, например здесь https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1219840932/history

придется откатить и вашу правку, и все правки этого товарища
b-jazz (2026-07-16 16:15:33+00:00): way 1539099360 and it's neighbor partially overlap, but map the same body of water. They should be represented with a single polygon and not two overlapping (or even adjoining) polygons. Can you please fix this? Thx.
MappingMore (2026-07-16 04:45:31+00:00):  Partially Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185642921
Spixi (2026-07-23 13:18:08+00:00): Hi @silly_goose, die SEV-Haltestelle für die Haltestelle „Grundend“ fehlt noch. Magst du sie noch ergänzen?

Die Haltestelle „Grundend“ wird an eine Ersatzhaltestelle auf der Kölner Straße verlegt, in Richtung Krefeld in Höhe der Hausnummer 658 und in Richtung Holthausen in Höhe der Hausnummer 647.
silly_goose (2026-07-27 15:03:33+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis! Die Haltestellen waren schon eingepflegt, nur hatte ich die bei der U76 vergessen als Halt reinzunehmen :)
silly_goose (2026-07-27 15:04:56+00:00): Nur warum Grundend bei OSM nicht auftauchen mag, da bin ich tatsächlich überfragt.

Auf ÖPNVKarte.de erscheint der Halt, das greift ja auf OSM zurück
muralito (2026-07-31 02:27:24+00:00): Buenas. No es bueno meter datos a sin reconciliar con lo que ya hay. Hay un plugin de JOSM que se llama Conflate y sirve para eso.
Departamento de Geografía - MIDES (2026-07-31 13:00:55+00:00): Buenas, muchas gracias por la aclaración, lo tomo en cuenta y lo estaré usando. Gracias!
AndyB_66 (2026-07-14 18:06:25+00:00): Stosuj się, proszę, do zasad komentowania zestawów zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Trafford_Mapper (2026-07-14 18:10:10+00:00): Hi; Firstly welcome to OSM! Wonderful to have you here! 

I've amended your edit slightly, the hotel didn't need a separate 'point' marker adding, I'd already tagged the building (As they're the only occupant) for the hotel - So I've merged the data you added onto the new 'Point' onto the building itself to ensure that extra helpful data you added is still there.
misc2014 (2026-07-14 19:24:32+00:00): Hi, thank you so much! Still quite new here so wasn't aware, thank you for amending that :)
neuhausr (2026-07-15 16:11:16+00:00): Hi, I'm curious why you added layer=-1 to the pedestrian area in the water park. It seems to be at ground level, so should have no layer tag at all (implicitly layer=0). In case the crossing warnings were your motivation, I'd note that the wiki's layer page says "Do not use layer=-1 to hide warnings about crossing or overlapping ways. Either fix them properly or leave the easily visible warning so that others can fix them." Happy mapping!
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-14 16:39:54+00:00): dzięki za poprawę!
zstadler (2026-07-16 08:03:08+00:00): Hello xx yyy19,

Thank you for your contribution to OSM.

Please note that user is also actively mapping in the Gaza Strip.

I'd appreciate if you could take a look at  his updates with this OSMCha query

https://osmcha.org/changesets/185768975?filters=%7B%22users%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22Jenessian%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22Jenessian%22%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%2C%22metadata%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22hashtags%3D%23palestine%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22hashtags%3D%23palestine%22%7D%5D%7D

and see if there are inconsistencies with the imagery you are using.
eggie (2026-07-14 17:22:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback.. Svp geen adressen toevoegen. Die zijn er al. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Sébastien Pi (2026-07-23 20:38:29+00:00): Salut Alex, je te remercie pour ce que tu as fait sur Cambrai. On en parlait justement ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3657167
Sébastien Pi (2026-07-23 20:46:53+00:00): Ma petite pierre à l’édifice : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186257962
Alexb60 (2026-07-24 19:23:50+00:00): De rien ;)
Dimitar155 (2026-07-28 13:12:37+00:00): Thank you for your edits here and in Bulgaria! It looks absolute fabulous!
AnnaCatarina (2026-07-31 10:23:03+00:00): Thanks for the flowers.
pnorman (2026-07-14 19:34:32+00:00): are you sure these roads connect? It looks like the residential street terminates north of the boulevard
Nirmala03 (2026-07-16 13:54:32+00:00): Hi pnorman,
Our internal GPS trace evidence clearly indicates that the residential street extends all the way to the boulevard. Based on this physical movement data, the created connection is valid and reflects actual traffic flow. 
Please note regarding the community consultations, we are currently working on them internally and will not be making any further edits until the process is complete.
SimonPoole (2026-07-15 07:57:22+00:00): Hi, not quite sure what you were tying to do in this changeset but you moved the international border by about 8 meters. Both according to Swiss boundary data and Italian, see: https://www.dsantini.it/dbsn/boundaries/#18/45.927215/7.877095

I'll move it back as it was likely unintentional.