piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DaAlx (2026-02-15 16:23:10+00:00): Hi Tatfahren, 
ich habe https://schuldatenbank.sachsen.de/docs/api.html   benutzt, wobei ich keine Daten direkt von dort übernommen habe. 
Ich habe den Server benutzt, um zu verifizieren, dass Gebäude, die in OSM mit building=school getaggt sind, tatsächlich Stand jetzt zu einer Schule gehören, und habe mich dann darum gekümmert, dass bei der Schule auch ein amenity=school existiert. Tatsächlich ist diese Aktion ursprünglich aus der "rückwärts-Richtung" entstanden. Mir sind fehler in den amtlichen Daten zu Schulen aufgefallen und deswegen habe ich angefangen, die amtlichen Daten mit OSM-Daten zu vergleichen mit dem Ziel bei der verantwortlichen  behörde eine Korrektur ihrer Daten vorzuschlagen.
Karthoo (2026-02-17 12:05:46+00:00): Hallo, gibt es einen praktischen Grund, warum du flächendeckend die Wegweiser aus den Relationen löscht?
Senihtu (2026-02-18 05:48:02+00:00): In einer superroute sollten nur routen stehen. 
und ich nehme die diese wegweiser nur raus, wenn sie in den Routen enthalten sind. das überprüfe ich vorher bei jedem einzelnen
Karthoo (2026-02-20 10:04:32+00:00): Gibt es im Wiki irgendwo eine Stelle, die das besagt? Ich verstehe schon, dass die Wegweiser so theoretisch einmal in der Superroute selbst und nochmal in der node-network Route stehen, aber das stört doch erst mal nicht, oder? Jetzt sind an den Wegweisern direkt leider keine Hinwese mehr auf die Rundwege zu finden. Und theoretisch bestehen die Rundwege/touristischen Wege aus den Wegweisern (wo die Routensymbole angebracht sind) und den Verbindungsrouten zum nächsten Wegweiser (entlang denen man normalerweise wirklich keine Hinweise auf die Route findet)
Senihtu (2026-02-20 13:46:12+00:00): in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Types_of_relation findet sich "superrouten enthalten nur andere route-Relationen"

In https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:superroute und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:superroute ist in der Spalte am rechten Rand zu sehen: Member sind nur Relationen

Es gab zu dem Thema auch mal eine kurze Diskussion : https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/superroute-viele-josm-warnungen/139539

Viele der betroffenen Routen enthalten weniger als 10 member und die drüber liegende superroute somit weit weniger als 300 ways und nodes. 
Da könnte man auch einfach eine ganz normale Route draus machen. Aber so weit wollte ich beim Umbau nicht gehen.
eggie (2026-02-15 10:14:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-02-15 07:12:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13565922862 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Parcel Drop Off Point"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-24 05:34:53+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178579787
PizzaTreeIsland (2026-02-15 08:33:19+00:00): Hello Wasila, 
as you continue to add all those Zoom Room locations, please take some time to read through this feedback: 

- Please do NOT use any building=* tags when the place is inside a building that is already mapped, like a mall. building=commercial does not mean that the place is inside a commercial building, but that it's the building itself, in which case two overlapping buildings exist. building=* tags on a dog training facility only makes sense if the whole building is the dog training building, which in most instances is not the case, as they are often in malls or other bigger buildings. 
- If you don't know the exact shape of the dog training place inside the building, just add it as a node instead of a polygon shape. As you can tell, most places inside malls are mapped that way. It is okay to also map dog training places as shapes, but if you do, please make them actually the shape of the business. 
- Please use dog=designated on the places you map. dog=yes means that dogs are allowed there, dog=designated means that it's a place made for dogs, which is obviously true in the places you map. It is never correct to use dogs. 
- Add amenity=animal_training and animal_training=dog to your places. Adding them consistently makes it easy to, for example, find all the dog training facilities in a certain city, which is the whole point of making this map. 

Over the last 24h, I had to make countless edits to clear up your mistakes. Missing animal_training=dog tags are not a huge deal, that's more about data quality, but especially the badly drawn building outlines that overlap with actual buildings (point 1) and to a lesser degree, the usage of dogs instead of dog, cause a lot of work for me. 

Best
Jonas
SafwatHalaby (2026-02-18 12:58:05+00:00): נדמה לי שצריך גם https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tomb%3Drock-cut
SafwatHalaby (2026-02-18 12:58:44+00:00): האם מדובר במערת קבורה? נדמה שהעריכה המקורית תארה רק מערה כללית
hatul (2026-02-18 16:14:49+00:00): נכון, לא יודע למה כתבתי tomb. אפשר להגדיר מערה, העיקר שלא אטרקציה.
hatul (2026-02-18 16:30:18+00:00): המרתי למערה
Supaplex (2026-02-16 05:04:23+00:00): 已經有了 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8280854455
而且不在那位置
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178572861
Taya_S (2026-02-19 14:19:21+00:00): Hi,

please you're essentially duplicating the wikidata tag 3 times here. Onces correctly, species:wikidata, and twice incorrectly for the regular wikidata and wikipedia tags. These should not link to the generic species wikidata page.
qstep (2026-02-19 20:38:04+00:00): I have fixed the duplicate and incorrent data in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178791976
zidausbie (2026-02-15 13:11:11+00:00): Hallo MiMoHo
Danke fürs fixen. Wieder ein paar Notes weniger in der Karte.
Grüße
Dirk (zidausbie)
FrViPofm (2026-02-18 09:04:36+00:00): Bien le bonjour,
Les amenity=posst_box du groupe de modification, ce ne serait pas plutôt des amenity=letter_box ?
yargil (2026-02-18 16:03:09+00:00): Exact je me suis trompé.
C'est maintenant corrigé.
Merci de l'avoir remarqué.
mavl (2026-03-30 15:32:58+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы добавляете несуществующие дороги. Пожалуйста, добавляйте только реальные объекты.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Хороший_стиль
MarcoR (2026-02-15 10:52:38+00:00): Qual è la fonte del "nome giusto"?

Sembra piuttosto solo vandalismo…
Antonino_Faro (2026-02-15 14:37:43+00:00): Ciao, ho analizzato i tuoi inserimenti recenti e ho dovuto procedere a un revert (ripristino) totale delle modifiche.
​I dati inseriti violavano il copyright (uso di fonti non libere come Google Maps/Waze) e presentavano evidenti caratteristiche di vandalismo.

​Ti chiedo di fermarti immediatamente.

​OpenStreetMap si basa sul lavoro di volontari e su licenze aperte (ODbL). Inserire dati copiati da mappe proprietarie o danneggiare intenzionalmente la mappa mette a rischio l'intero progetto, anche dal punto di vista legale.
​Prima di effettuare qualsiasi altra modifica, ti invito a:
​- Leggere la Guida per i principianti sulla Wiki di OpenStreetMap.
​- Non copiare MAI da fonti esterne (Google, Waze, mappe cartacee) se non esplicitamente autorizzato.
- ​Rispettare il lavoro della comunità evitando vandalismi.
​Se continuerai a ignorare queste regole, il tuo account verrà segnalato al Data Working Group per un blocco.

Ti ringrazio per la tua comprensione

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178584836
kingkingHK (2026-02-15 11:22:21+00:00): Imo you should have un-deleted original relation like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177142376 to "preserve the history" , not create a new one, but this isn't really important so I guess I can let it slide.
vectorial8192 (2026-02-15 17:08:13+00:00): It did momentarily occur to me "I should do undelete", but then I thought, "the original straight-only is consequential because the real one should be no-uturn", so I just made a new one.

Also iD clicking is easier than JOSM clicking.
dieterdreist (2026-02-21 10:56:06+00:00): Hi, the place nodes you added for Borgo and Prati and possibly others are duplicates because there are already polygons for them. Please check if there are more like this, thank you.
AlCeRoma (2026-02-21 17:35:38+00:00): i punti sono stati inseriti perché i nomi associati alle relazioni multipoligono non compaiono nella mappa
dieterdreist (2026-02-22 11:45:38+00:00): sì, ci sono tante mappe dove compaiono, funziona anche per la ricerca, il geocoding etc., ma col inserimento dei doppioni non funziona più, fa vedere 2 volte i nomi. Se ci sono le informazioni ma una determinata mappa non li usa, bisogna cambiare la mappa, non i dati.
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-15 10:17:30+00:00): Hallo,

kurze Frage: Wieso wurden hier bei manchen Straßen die name:de entfernt?

Danke und viele Grüße
Pascal
EUMapper (2026-02-15 15:53:50+00:00): Hallo,
name.de findet dich auf keinen Strassennamen in LU. Französisch oder luxemburgisch sind die angezeigten Strassennamen. Dies hat hat auch die Ereignisse  zwischen 1940 und 1945 als Ursache! Wir sind in LU aus diesem Grund einvertanden dass alle eingedeutschten Strassennamem sofort (!!) entfernt werden. dies mit alles möglichen Konsequenzen!!. Ich denke dass nichts mehr hinzugefügt werden muss und verbleibe mit Mapper-Grüssen!! EU-Mapper
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-15 16:07:59+00:00): Hi EU-Mapper, danke für deine ausführliche Antwort.

Auch wenn die gelöschten Namen nicht auf den Straßenschildern stehen, wird sich der ursprüngliche Mapper vermutlich etwas dabei gedacht haben, als er sie eingetragen hat. Daher war ich im ersten Moment etwas überrascht, dass sie jetzt entfernt wurden.

In einem anderen Changeset wurde das ebenfalls schon einmal thematisiert. Da ich allerdings kein lokaler Mapper bin, möchte ich mich hier nicht weiter einmischen.

Beste Grüße
Pascal

#HappyMapping
EUMapper (2026-02-15 16:15:38+00:00): Hallo,
was sich der ursprüngliche Mapper dabei gedacht hat entzieht sich meiner Kenntnis. Dies möchte ich auch nicht weiter kommentieren. Fakt ist das auf keinem Strassenschild in LU ein deutscher Strassename steht, u.a. aus genannten Gründen. Französische rechtliche Texte sind vor Gericht trotz deutscher Übersetztungen bindend. Deutsche Strassennamen werden gelöscht (Punkt.) Beste Grüsse!!!!! EU-Mapper
LordGarySugar (2026-02-16 17:23:03+00:00): I have reverted some of the changes made here - it was not correct to delete the woods within Dallow Downs.
kingkingHK (2026-02-15 11:28:31+00:00): I might be nitpicking yet again, but I don't think you should move https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/935824986 that far downstream.
vectorial8192 (2026-02-16 08:17:23+00:00): The physical shape is basically asking for smooth merging from Lam Tei Interchange (ground) to CPR, while giving priority to Route 9 exit. Just that, it's not feasible to draw a yield line along the travel direction (way too long), so they just went with a yield line right at where the lane separation ends.
Kovoschiz (2026-02-16 08:38:52+00:00): `change=no` and `give_way:lanes=` has already been used. `highway:lanes=` is another option. `wait:lanes=` was rejected for a few reason.
desperek (2026-02-15 13:01:27+00:00): zostawiłem twoje poprawki wszedzie, ale sam odcinek na moscie podmienilem, zeby highway+sidewalk=both, bo jakoś tak ładniej się będzie renderować i bliżej prawdy mam wrażenie...
eggie (2026-02-15 14:37:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
nevw (2026-02-15 11:46:00+00:00): Hi, I used more recent Esri imagery to reshape the house
ch100 (2026-02-16 05:28:25+00:00): Thank you.
Carto_Graph (2026-03-11 16:54:46+00:00): Добрый день. Вы по-русски написали, OSM так не поймёт. Я исправил. Пешком там можно пройти?
CK@304HuK (2026-03-11 18:29:49+00:00): пешком да, там шлагбаум который пропускает только троллейбусы другой транспорт нет
Eric S (2026-02-24 10:47:37+00:00): Je conteste l'appellation "Autoroute Alpine" ou "L'Alpine". C'est pour ça que je l'ai retiré en 2020.

Discussion côté OSM :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113403005#map=12/46.0455/6.1029

Discussion côté wikipedia :

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion:Tunnel_de_l%27%C3%89pine
AurélienQ (2026-02-24 14:09:02+00:00): Autant pour moi, je ne savais pas que ce nom était discuté vu qu'il était écrit sur wikipédia et wiki sara
Eric S (2026-02-24 20:03:55+00:00): Le problème, c'est que ce sont des références circulaires. Les wiki citent OSM. OSM cite les wikis...
aaronq227 (2026-02-18 20:58:12+00:00): Hi andi9876,

I noticed you changed some primary ways to primary_link and trunk ways to trunk_link. The OSM Wiki states that "_link tags are used to identify linking ways such as slip roads/ramps and "channelised" (most commonly physically separated) at-grade turning lanes connecting the through carriageways/through lanes of highways to other roadways of all types, where the linking way is not the main line of either of the highways being linked but forms the connection between them” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link). The primary ways (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297937343) and (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299672647) seem to be the main highway for the "Yothapol Khemarak Phoumin Boulevard (Street 271)” road. The wiki also mentions that " _link tags should also be used for physical channelization of turning traffic lanes at traffic signal junctions and in roundabout designs that physically separate a specific turn from the main roundabout” and trunk_links such as (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1464267288) and (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241872306) seem to be the main line that connects into a roundabout and isn’t physically separated. Based on this, would you be opening to changing these back to highway=primary and highway=trunk? 

Thank you for your time and I look forward to hearing from you!
andi9876 (2026-02-18 22:23:17+00:00): Hello.
I think it's advantageous to label all roads in this confusing roundabout system consistently as link roads.
I propose classifying complex, multi-level roundabout systems (with bridges/ramps) uniformly as link roads. This avoids "instruction salad" in navigation (e.g., constant road number changes), improves visual clarity in rendering, and ensures consistent lane guidance (turn:lanes) throughout the entire junction area.
aaronq227 (2026-02-20 14:35:45+00:00): Thanks for explaining your reasoning. I wanted to clarify that link roads in OSM are intended for slip roads, ramps, or channelized connectors between highways—not continuous segments of the main route. Using them here goes against standard OSM guidance, which exists to ensure consistency across regions and ensures all users are on the same page regarding tagging preferences. For example, link classification often triggers unnecessary “keep right” or “merge” prompts in navigation, fragments what should display as a continuous through route, and doesn’t benefit lane guidance, which works equally well with base classification. The standard approach better reflects the ground truth and avoids these routing complications.

Would you be open to reverting to base classification, or would it help to get community input on this interpretation? Happy to discuss further.
andi9876 (2026-02-21 11:55:14+00:00): Thanks again for the exchange. To summarize my reasoning regarding the Hun Sen Boulevard Interchange:

1. Functional Decoupling: Since the main through-traffic for Asian Highway AH1 and National Highway 1 (NH1) is designed to use the flyovers and underpasses, the roundabout below acts physically and functionally as a distributor (interchange).
2. Route Relations vs. Way Tagging: The continuity of AH1 and NH1 is already correctly maintained through Route Relations. These relations ensure that the highways are mapped as continuous routes for data consumers. Tagging the roundabout segments as 'links' does not break these relations, but it accurately describes the segments' role as connectors.
3. Navigation UX: Using base classification for the roundabout segments often forces routers to announce 'AH1/NH1' repeatedly within the junction. Treating them as links provides much cleaner voice instructions ('Follow the roundabout') while the user is transitioning between the major boulevards.
4. Visual & Logical Hierarchy: This approach clearly distinguishes the high-speed through-levels from the slower distribution level, reflecting the ground truth of this complex multi-level structure.

I believe this strikes the best balance between strict tagging standards and real-world utility. However, I value consistency—if you still feel that base classification is mandatory here despite the relation coverage, I am open to a final community verdict.
aaronq227 (2026-02-26 17:50:34+00:00): Hello andi9876,
I appreciate your openness to community feedback, I am working on communicating with some local mappers and will get back to you regarding their perspectives on the matter. Hope you have a nice day!
Sammyhawkrad (2026-02-15 14:21:56+00:00): Hello, don't add made-up names to roads or any other object. "road link to a village" is not a name.

Tag the polygons around settlements with landuse=residential instead of place=*.
Manuel H (2026-03-13 19:27:11+00:00): Hi,

a small tip: when you don't find a bench, just delete it or add lifecycle prefixes, see the OSM wiki.
If you add a fixme, don't delete all the other tags. 

Have a nice day.
peateasea (2026-03-14 06:26:03+00:00): Sorry! I didn't know I'd done that. I was using StreetComplete to make the change, so I don't know how the fixmes ended up in the changeset. I'd guessed that StreetComplete would actually do the deletion. Sorry for making extra work!
Manuel H (2026-03-14 10:33:09+00:00): No problem. No harm done. 

fixme's are just another tag added to an object. They should be used if you suspect a mapping error. 
I don't use StreetComplete, but I notice that it likes to create problems. It shouldn't remove existent tags when adding a fixme.  

Anyway, in case of a simple bench....  if there is no current e.g. construction, so that i might only be temporarily moved, and you cannot see it at the location, remove it. No need for a fixme Tag.
peateasea (2026-03-14 18:10:22+00:00): Good to know! Thanks for the explanation :-)
StreetComplete just asks the question "is this bench still there?" and one can answer yes, no, add a note, or move it to a new location. In this case, IIRC, I just answered "no", so if the tags got changed that sounds like a bug in StreetComplete. It's a shame that it makes extra work for people (e.g. in this case), it's a fun app to use.
Grass-snake (2026-02-15 22:18:44+00:00): Здравствуйте, если меняете название улицы, пожалуйста, не забывайте менять теги addr:street в домах, которые относятся к этой улицы.

Временно вернул старое название для улицы Космонавтов, если настаиваете на другой последовательности слов, поменяйте ещё адресные теги.
k2101 (2026-02-15 20:37:48+00:00): Antykwariat cały czas istnieje. Dlaczego go usunięto?
uprkos (2026-02-15 20:47:02+00:00): Nie widziałem tam szyldu, wyglądało jak by całą tę część zajmowało BWA. Ale ogólnie robiłem dużo poprawek w Krośnie, bo sporo miejsc było nieaktualnych, błędnie otagowanych lub z nazwą, której konwencja nie jest zgodna z oficjalnymi zasadami nazewnictwa w OSM Wiki. Możliwe więc, że w jakimś miejscu popełniłem błąd...
k2101 (2026-02-15 20:52:54+00:00): Nie aktualizowałem POI od dłuższego czasu. Dzięki za poprawki. 
Antykwariat jest natomiast do przywrócenia. To miejsce kultowe.
uprkos (2026-02-15 21:08:16+00:00): Przywróciłem. Dzięki za wyłapanie i gdybyś zobaczył jeszcze coś podejrzanego, to pisz. Tak mi się w Krośnie spodobało, że niebawem na pewno tam wrócę i odwiedzę ten antykwariat w ramach pokuty.
k2101 (2026-02-15 21:16:33+00:00): Dzięki. A antykwariat polecam zobaczyć. Przechodzi się tam przez szafę jak do Narnii :)

Możesz jeszcze zerknąć tutaj. Tam klub chyba też nie jest oszyldowany, ale na pewno istnieje w budynku hotelu.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178517221#map=19/49.683837/21.772255
uprkos (2026-02-17 19:09:26+00:00): To nawet zabawne, bo spałem w tym hotelu i nigdzie nie widziałem tego klubu... Będę tam za niecałe 3 tygodnie ponownie, sprawdzę gdzie dokładnie jest wejście do tego przybytku i naniosę.
rempshaener (2026-02-15 20:20:19+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Mit deinem Änderungssatz hast du mehrere hundert Objekte gelöscht, die ich gerade wiederhergestellt habe. Magst du erläutern, was du vorhattest?
Viele Grüße
Kovoschiz (2026-02-16 08:59:57+00:00): I treated this as a gyratory with `=secondary` + `junction=circular` (but was removed)
vectorial8192 (2026-02-16 13:18:00+00:00): tbh there is no gyratory; just use the turn lanes etc and then vehicles could get where they need to go, no need to drive into Boundary Street.
Kovoschiz (2026-04-27 19:42:09+00:00): Forgot about here: Yes there is, there are 2 lanes to Chui Yu Rd on this side, and it's signposted https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=813714736238904&focus=photo
vectorial8192 (2026-05-01 12:15:46+00:00): The photo quality is highly questionable, but assuming you are referring to the large sign on the left, are you sure it's not trying to describe "hard right" but actually "forward diagonal right" (which would support your gyratory opinion)?
NeisBot (2026-02-15 12:24:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13566351397 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Sklep zoologiczny"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Sklep zoologiczny"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-24 05:34:53+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178729633
Syl (2026-02-15 13:04:37+00:00): Bonjour, il a l'air d'y avoir un problème avec certains noms. "[Station électrique]" ne devrait probablement pas être ajouté dans les noms.
barley383 (2026-02-15 13:37:50+00:00): Bonjour,
Ah oui je les ai laissé vu que c'est le nom côté citiz.
Mais tu penses que je devrais les enlever, je peux repasser les enlever :)
barley383 (2026-02-15 13:41:16+00:00): zut, je me rend compte que j'ai ajouté des "ref" sans le vouloir.
Je sais pas si ils sont stables dans le temps
Syl (2026-02-15 19:02:15+00:00): Ça a plutôt l'air d'être une info en plus qui ne fait pas partie du nom,  tout comme pour celle-ci avec "en travaux" dans le nom : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11889899760

Je ne sais pas pour la stabilité des ref.
trallalallalaa (2026-02-15 12:36:01+00:00): Oops, comentario erróneo. Quería decir "Actualizando residential=apartments en vez de tourism apartments..."
syntex (2026-04-03 18:33:31+00:00): To nie są poprawne adresy