piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Adam Dunn (2024-07-16 03:44:58+00:00): Hello, and thank you for your contributions to buildings in High Level.
It looks like your traces of the buildings have some odd angles in them, whereas in the ESRI imagery it looks like the buildings have 90 degree angles.
I thought it might help your future mapping to tell you about the "orthogonalize" button in the iD map editor: with a building selected, you can press the q key to make all the angles be 90 degrees. It greatly speeds up mapping to use this shortcut!
Have a nice day!
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-15 22:06:38+00:00): Hello. Welcome to OSM! I see you have requested a review of this changeset. I have reviewed your changeset and it looks good. Keep up the great contributions!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153990180
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-15 22:06:10+00:00): Hello. Welcome to OSM! I see you have requested a review of this changeset. I have reviewed your changeset and it looks good. Keep up the great contributions!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153990181
Lumikeiju (2024-07-15 21:31:33+00:00): This changeset edited no geometry and made the following tag-only modifications:

Filter: way["building"="retail"]["addr:housenumber"]([!"addr:city"]|[!"addr:state"]|[!"addr:country"]);

Added:
"addr:city=Seattle" | 12 objects
"addr:state=WA" | 145 objects
"addr:country=US" | 321 objects

Removed:
"source:addr:id=*" | 4 objects
"source=*" except where "source~.*http.*" | 253 objects
DP24PH (2024-07-17 11:05:44+00:00): Greetings in Veritas et Fortitudo, Pro Deo et Patria!

We have noticed that you took down the 500kV Transmission Network recently. May we know why it got taken down without consensus?

Your timely response is highly appreciated.


DP24
ervinjoshuadelrosario (2026-06-24 14:17:50+00:00): Sorry for not replying and removed the relation 500kV Transmission Network without consensus. Now I will readd it again.
Lumikeiju (2024-07-15 21:45:10+00:00): This changeset edited no geometry and made the following tag-only modifications:

Filter: way["building"="commercial"]["addr:housenumber"]([!"addr:city"]|[!"addr:state"]|[!"addr:country"]);

Added:
"addr:city=Seattle" | 4 objects
"addr:state=WA" | 30 objects
"addr:country=US" | 130 objects

Removed:
"source:addr:id=*" | 10 objects
"source=*" except where "source~.*http.*" | 75 objects
"gnis:county_id=*" | 1
"gnis:created=*" | 1
"gnis:state_id=*" | 1
eggie (2024-07-16 07:53:21+00:00): Dag Kersthaas,
Je vraagt feedback 
warnings:mismatched_geometry:unclosed_multipolygon_part

Renderen doet de landuse hier niet meer.
Waarom zou je er één bos van willen maken?
De polygonen zijn niet gesloten. Ook heb je er hier multipolygonen van gemaakt terwijl dat niet direct nodig is.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-07-16 07:54:59+00:00): Naast dat de multipolygonen niet gesloten zijn bevat ook een weg tweemaal hetzelfde segment.
Ik denk dat ik je aanpassing beter kan terugdraaien en dan even kijken of de fouten eruit zijn. 

Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-07-16 07:59:41+00:00): reverted by changeset #154002096

Hier zaten zoveel foutjes in dat ik het heb teruggedraaid.
Tip Voor die ingewikkelde landuse kun je het best editor JOSM gebruiken.
Met een simpele editor gaat dit niet.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047

Even kijken wat de rendering nu doet.

MVG
eggie
Misa_zumba (2024-07-26 14:56:52+00:00): Hi Bre543Kitty,
I noticed you edited the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17128406 by removing the polygon and leaving only the node. You've added another admin_level=5 relation as well.
Can you explain whether the relation "Vanadzor community" exists and if so can you fix it?
Lumikeiju (2024-07-15 22:04:15+00:00): Filter: way(["building"="house"]|["building"="detached"])["addr:housenumber"][!"name"]([!"addr:city"]|[!"addr:state"]|[!"addr:country"]);

Added:
"addr:city=Seattle" | 68 objects
"addr:state=WA" | 67 objects
"addr:country=US" | 2695 objects

Removed:
"source:addr:id=*" | 15 objects
"source=*" except where "source~.*http.*" | 1935 objects
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-16 01:17:00+00:00): Reverted by DWG as rivers changed to beaches

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153994134
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-16 01:17:01+00:00): Reverted by DWG as rivers changed to beaches

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153994134
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-16 01:25:06+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16459
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-15 22:55:57+00:00): Hello.  You requested a review of the changeset.  The opening hours is not quite correctly entered.  Please review:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

Let me know if you would like me to re-review after you've made the corrections.  :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153991421
Lumikeiju (2024-07-15 22:25:46+00:00): This changeset edited no geometry and made the following tag-only modifications:

Filter: way(["building"="house"]|["building"="detached"])["addr:housenumber"][!"name"]([!"addr:city"]|[!"addr:state"]|[!"addr:country"]);

Added:
"addr:state=WA" | 201 objects
"addr:country=US" | 5591 objects

Removed:
"source:addr:id=*" | 37 objects
"source=*" except where "source~.*http.*" | 5524 objects
lakedistrict (2024-07-16 06:36:24+00:00): Hi, is it correct to include the club name in the stadium/ground name? The name tag should be for the name only. Perhaps the club could be recorded under a different tag.
womer_uk (2024-07-16 18:08:48+00:00): Hi, the problem with just doing that is many grounds have a sponsor name on them, and these change virtually every couple of years so the ground is hard to find.
So I've used the unsponsored name, (Hull City Football Stadium instead of MKM Stadium) and put the team that plays there in the title to make it much easier to find when doing a quick search when just searching the map.
gurglypipe (2024-07-16 19:03:41+00:00): You could have used alt_name or official_name or any one of the other name variant tags (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#Variants) so that each ground could be tagged with *both* names rather than the one you were searching for. Other people may search for the sponsor name.

The name of something on OSM should match how it’s signposted on the ground: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#Values
womer_uk (2024-07-17 00:26:42+00:00): I have removed the club names from the grounds I edited
Lumikeiju (2024-07-15 22:53:08+00:00): This changeset edited no geometry and made the following tag-only modifications:

Filter: way(["building"="house"]|["building"="detached"])["addr:housenumber"][!"name"]([!"addr:city"]|[!"addr:state"]|[!"addr:country"]);

Added:
"addr:city=Seattle" | 8 objects
"addr:state=WA" | 150 objects
"addr:country=US" | 5085 objects

Removed:
"source:addr:id=*" | 43 objects
"source=*" except where "source~.*http.*" | 4857 objects
Hufkratzer (2024-07-16 21:39:58+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1301631982 does not look like a riding centre, it looks like an outdoor riding arena. In OSM these are usually tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1025956497.
In JOSM you can use the preset for sport=equestrian to tag them.
See also
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
Lumikeiju (2024-07-15 23:01:50+00:00): This changeset edited no geometry and made the following tag-only modifications:

Filter: way(["building"="house"]|["building"="detached"])["addr:housenumber"][!"name"]([!"addr:city"]|[!"addr:state"]|[!"addr:country"]);

Added:
"addr:city=Seattle" | 30 objects
"addr:state=WA" | 750 objects
"addr:country=US" | 3406 objects

Removed:
"source:addr:id=*" | 65 objects
"source:addr=*" | 3 objects
"source=*" except where "source~.*http.*" | 1792 objects
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-16 01:11:13+00:00): Hi prz91 & welcome to OSM. Thanks for your enthusiasm, but just need to point out that you've mapped the cartpath as an area, where they're really only intended to be lines. Thanks
Lumikeiju (2024-07-15 23:23:44+00:00): This changeset edited no geometry and made the following tag-only modifications:

Filter: way(["building"="house"]|["building"="detached"])["addr:housenumber"][!"name"]([!"addr:city"]|[!"addr:state"]|[!"addr:country"]);

Added:
"addr:city=Seattle" | 4 objects
"addr:country=US" | 3602 objects

Removed:
"source:addr:id=*" | 20 objects
"source=*"  | 3523 objects
klfb75gxiy21tjrh (2024-07-15 23:30:08+00:00): Hola, por que no me respondes? 🥺
klfb75gxiy21tjrh (2024-07-15 23:30:11+00:00): Hola, por que no me respondes? 🥺
rskedgell (2024-07-16 10:23:46+00:00): Are ALL of these roads explicitly signed as pedestrians prohibited (TSRGD diagram 625.1)? Can you provide any links to the relevant traffic orders?
AneurinEllisEvans (2024-07-16 10:49:42+00:00): I don't know how to find traffic orders, but the A34 is an expressway so my understanding was non-motorised users can't use the road itself (like a motorway) but are provided with alternative paths (because it's still a right of way). However, I may have misunderstood that.
Lumikeiju (2024-07-15 23:28:23+00:00): This changeset edited no geometry and made the following tag-only modifications:

Filter: way(["building"="house"]|["building"="detached"])["addr:housenumber"][!"name"]([!"addr:city"]|[!"addr:state"]|[!"addr:country"]);

Added:
"addr:city=Seattle" | 1 objects
"addr:country=US" | 2138 objects

Removed:
"source:addr:id=*" | 3 objects
"source=*" | 2089 objects
Hufkratzer (2024-07-16 21:00:40+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1301634980 does not look like a riding centre, it looks like an outdoor riding arena. In OSM these are usually tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1008770819
See also
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
Lumikeiju (2024-07-15 23:37:23+00:00): This changeset edited no geometry and made the following tag-only modifications:

Filter: way(["building"="house"]|["building"="detached"])["addr:housenumber"][!"name"]([!"addr:city"]|[!"addr:state"]|[!"addr:country"]);

Added:
"addr:city=Seattle" | 12 objects
"addr:country=US" | 6588 objects

Removed:
"source:addr:id=*" | 24 objects
"source=*" | 6209 objects
disc24 (2024-07-17 08:14:01+00:00): Hallo,
bei Deinen Änderungen ist anscheinend versehentlich ein Punkt vom Pfad https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/739792841 verschoben worden. Der sieht jetzt ein wenig komisch aus. ;-)
Vielleicht kannst Du da nochmal schauen...
Danke und viele Grüße
Dirk
Lumikeiju (2024-07-15 23:46:37+00:00): This changeset edited no geometry and made the following tag-only modifications:

Filter: way(["building"="house"]|["building"="detached"])["addr:housenumber"][!"name"]([!"addr:city"]|[!"addr:state"]|[!"addr:country"]);

Added:
"addr:city=Seattle" | 8 objects
"addr:state=WA" | 69 objects
"addr:country=US" | 9243 objects

Removed:
"source:addr:id=*" | 27 objects
"source=*" | 8917 objects
Lumikeiju (2024-07-15 23:53:17+00:00): This changeset edited no geometry and made the following tag-only modifications:

Filter: way(["building"="house"]|["building"="detached"])["addr:housenumber"][!"name"]([!"addr:city"]|[!"addr:state"]|[!"addr:country"]);

Added:
"addr:city=Seattle" | 2 objects
"addr:country=US" | 9261 objects

Removed:
"source:addr:id=*" | 68 objects
"source=*" | 8819 objects
Amin Fozdar (2024-07-16 04:30:21+00:00): Hi,
What does this changeset comment mean?
Thanks
QC3 Construction (2024-07-26 03:17:24+00:00): Hi, 
Change
Thanks
Amin Fozdar (2024-07-26 05:51:05+00:00): Hi,
I think you misread my question.
What does this changeset comment mean?
Thanks
Technotion (2024-07-26 21:02:13+00:00): Amen!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 03:07:19+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164878065
emersonveenstra (2024-07-19 16:02:04+00:00): Hi there,

Looks like you may be confused with highway=footway multipolygons. Right now you're using them as if you're mapping a large non-linear routing area. I think you're meaning to map them to show the area of the sidewalk, but that is tagged as "area:highway=footway" (and the sidewalk tag is left out).

Also, you should always still use linear ways for the actual sidewalk, otherwise routers can't use it.
amacmcgrann (2024-07-22 22:50:59+00:00): I got you. I'll go back and correct that if you haven't already. And I've been meaning to go put the linear ways back. Just haven't gotten there.
emersonveenstra (2024-08-24 13:01:18+00:00): Hi there,

Would really appreciate if you went back and did this. Since you deleted the linear ways which already existed, this is technically a form of vandalism (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism#Vandalism_and_other_types_of_bad_editing) "Purposeful removal or degradation of data that are known to be correct" and should be corrected quickly

Thanks!
amacmcgrann (2024-08-25 17:59:37+00:00): I'll get this taken care of today. I'm sorry I've been overly busy with personal and work life stuff.
GeeMaps! (2024-07-16 05:17:56+00:00): Hello R4M4Y4N4. Over a couple of CS, you've mapped a mosque over a very large area, then deleted it & remapped it across the road, but there's nothing visible for it on imagery, despite you apparently having used Bing? I have to ask if the mosque actually exists?
GeeMaps! (2024-07-16 05:19:11+00:00): Oh, a can you please also use better CS comments: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments? Thanks
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-16 06:59:45+00:00): Name of the relation has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/153996024

What's your plan with the following way? https://osm.org/way/1097037642
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-16 07:03:27+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/154000257
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-16 07:03:38+00:00): Please stop adding such data and naming!
Adam Dunn (2024-07-16 03:58:09+00:00): Really?
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-16 07:00:41+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/153996122
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-16 07:01:04+00:00): Please stop adding such data and naming!
Convectional (2024-07-23 04:00:34+00:00): good job, the way 1301658995 looks to have some offset
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153996116
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-16 07:02:09+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/154000220
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-16 07:02:33+00:00): Please stop adding such data and naming!
marczoutendijk (2024-07-16 07:23:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16460

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Adam Franco (2024-07-16 04:05:05+00:00): See https://www.vtcng.com/news_and_citizen/news/local_news/lake-eligo-zoning-changes-churn-the-waters/article_e8fadb80-f5f5-11eb-ba15-cfa6116c8a9b.html for a description of the dual outlets.
NeisBot (2024-07-16 04:15:55+00:00): Hello Max Adventures, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1301659703

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=153996257
InsertUser (2024-07-16 17:44:48+00:00): What is your source for the African buildings? They don't appear to match any available imagery.
KingKratos (2024-07-21 15:39:16+00:00): Bing
InsertUser (2024-08-05 15:50:57+00:00): The building and woods do not appear on Bing imagery. 

Do you have a source for these or have you made them up?
KingKratos (2024-08-05 15:54:09+00:00): Use Esri then I don’t remember. zoom it more
InsertUser (2024-08-05 15:59:16+00:00): I opened all available imagery at open at max zoom in JOSM to check this because of the absurd changeset size. 

These additions are pure fiction.
KingKratos (2024-08-05 16:04:23+00:00): Let me check I know I did map it correctly besides my changeset name (maybe the imagery was updated??)
KingKratos (2024-08-05 16:52:47+00:00): Yeah, that is weird. I don't know why it's not showing. You can just remove it. Maybe the imagery updated, but I don't know why it's so different. Maybe I was lagging really badly and it placed it in the wrong coordinates. I'm really not sure.
meongseolin (2024-07-16 04:38:11+00:00): 妈呀，中国内地的name常用简体，这繁体是怎么回事？
aixbrick (2024-07-16 11:32:48+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
was bedeutet "einen anderen Eigentümer"? Dort ist weiterhin irgendeine Art von Praxis oder Geschäft?
Gruß
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-16 17:18:06+00:00): I went ahead and added the name to the road.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153997461
mmd (2024-07-27 13:46:14+00:00): Seems a bit like wasted effort since it caught the attention of another user who then started to remove name=* tags again. ;)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ALu68/history
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-07-28 16:02:49+00:00): maybe this time they do it with minimal spot check to actually remove it from buildings only (rather than also from shops branded "House")
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-16 17:11:21+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM. You requested a review of this changeset. Looks like a good start.  "Q" can be used to square the building after you draw it.  I have corrected it for you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153997572
grzegorz75jan (2024-07-16 11:35:43+00:00): Przecież ścieżka przy Ryszarda Marka przy torze kolejowym przynajmniej na podkładzie orto przebiega trochę inaczej. Poprzednia wersja była lepsza. W dodatku nie oznaczyłeś nowej geometrii jako przejazd kolejowy. Sprawdzę to na dniach osobiście.
grzegorz75jan (2024-07-18 00:48:21+00:00): Ta ścieżka jest faktycznie deko przebudowana. Powiedzmy geometria deko do poprawy oraz przejazd kolejowy do dodania. Ścieżka rowerowa kończy się parę metrów przed torami ale to każdy zobaczy. Gdyby się ktoś uparł to można by jeszcze wstrzelić przejazdy rowerowe. Nie zwróciłem uwagi, że na Terleckiego też jest ścieżka rowerowa. Odcinek Ryszarda Marka od Terleckiego prawie pod tory jest rozkopana - brak przejazdu dla samochodów.
mcliquid (2024-07-16 07:39:40+00:00): Hallo Gerti Gold, warum hast du hier einen Wanderweg gelöscht, der gut im Luftbild sowie auch in der basemap.at sichtbar ist? Danke dir!
Gerti Gold (2024-07-16 07:49:11+00:00): Da dieser nicht mehr existiert !
eggie (2024-07-16 07:46:02+00:00): Dag greeniron,
Je vraagt feedback Lijkt me oke.
Je hoeft overigens geen oneway=no toe te voegen aan reguliere wegen.
Graag in de gaten houden wanneer de construction aangepast 'moet' worden. Dit heeft wel heel lang op construction gestaan. 
MVG
eggie
greeniron5813 (2024-07-16 08:06:21+00:00): Dankjewel! Ik heb voor de zekerheid inderdaad feedback gevraagd, ik doe niet vaak wijzigingen.

Ik woon hier vlak naast dus dat zou goed moeten komen. De weg die ik als open gemarkeerd heb is ook pas een week of twee open. De planning zoals die naar bewoners is gecommuniceerd is in ieder geval verre van accuraat. Ik zal zorgen dat de praktijk terugkomt in OSM!
eggie (2024-07-16 08:09:06+00:00): Top!
fortera_au (2024-07-16 07:38:00+00:00): Hey, good work on updating these, I've been meaning to do some work on some of these!

Couple of questions, is Stratco really a garden centre, DIY would suit it better I would have thought, especially the Gawler/Willaston store.
And I don't think the fresha.com link is really right for the website tag, maybe website:booking is more appropriate, what do you think?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153999575
kether924 (2024-07-17 00:57:36+00:00): Hi, thanks!

I switched to Garden centre while updating info from their official website, as it was listed there as a garden centre and thought it aligned better, but I think it's a fair call that DIY store is a better catch-all reasonably includes garden/outdoor stuff.

On the website, also a good call, was the closest thing I could find to a proper site but booking is definitely more accurate. Been trying to dig into the wiki on the tags as I'm going but missed the prefixed website sub-tag stuff. Cheers!
fortera_au (2024-07-17 01:21:34+00:00): I reckon the garden centre bit on their website is more along the lines of "we have a gardening and plants area", even though there isn't a huge amount compared to other stores.
jmaspons (2024-07-31 09:15:15+00:00): Perquè? A la llei de comarcalització surt com estava abans https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOA-d-2006-90251
aTarom (2024-07-31 12:12:48+00:00): Ok, vaig visitar "https://www.peñarroyadetastavins.es/", llavors com esta ara (v.25)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/342910/history/25
 la part "es" del multiname 
"name"="Peñarroya de Tastavíns / ..."
NO ha de coincidir amb
"name:es"="Peñarroya de Tastavins"
prenc nota
Salutacions
Davileci (2024-07-31 14:52:14+00:00): En la Ley 7/2002, de 15 de abril, de creación de la Comarca del Matarraña/Matarranya, https://www.boe.es/eli/es-ar/l/2002/04/15/7/con, aparece sin tilde. Según la RAE, no llevan tilde las agudas que terminan en dos consonantes, https://www.fundeu.es/recomendacion/acentuacion-casos-especiales/
jmaspons (2024-07-31 16:30:52+00:00): Ok, doncs canvio monitorOSM
BCNorwich (2024-07-16 08:57:26+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Reviewing your mapping as requested I can see a few inadvertent mistakes. 

The garages are crossing over each other, (warning given above). I think there would only be two garages, one for each house.

The two houses north of the garages look to be semi-detached, so they should be joined at the party wall.

The three other buildings tagged as building=house actually look like three pairs of semi-detached houses. So they are not a single residence, mapped thus the tag should be building=residential. If the building is split forming the two residences then each should be tagged building=house and house=semi-detached could also be added if desired.

If you need help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2024-07-25 07:55:50+00:00): No response so I've tweaked a few things as mentioned above.
Allison P (2024-08-01 10:12:02+00:00): Be careful not to connect landuse to boundaries, like Star city limits. It makes it harder to maintain.
tebby7 (2024-07-19 13:47:27+00:00): constant error which kept on saying its not connected. hence had to delete to see were it was exactly. and eventually added back the connection needed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154000217
Frans S (2024-07-20 12:08:16+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not add a layer tag to avoid an error. And, square each building please.
Best regards
tebby7 (2024-07-20 14:02:30+00:00): Hi, thank you. will resolve the issue
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154000505
Frans S (2024-07-21 08:32:26+00:00): Hi Tebby. I solved the issue. You don't need to do anything more here.
Best regards.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154000505
silversurfer83 (2024-07-16 07:34:17+00:00): Moin Marcus :)

zwei Fragen:

- "gemeldete Änderung" klingt, als würdest du für irgendwen im Auftrag arbeiten. Steht aber nichts in deinem Profil...

- Die Sperrung für den Verkehr, wie sieht die genau aus? Vielleicht lässt sich das ordentlich in der Datenbank abbilden

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154000941