piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2023-07-13 07:33:07+00:00): Hi Ocelotte,

what Jakka might be trying to say is that you created a changeset with a large bounding box covering the continent from Switzerland to Ireland. This needn't happen and in most cases is kind of bothering the people trying to do some Quality Assurance of the map data. More info here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

You probably didn't even notice because you use the neat little app "StreetComplete". It's a really helpful tool to add data to existing features and it's really nice of you to run around using it. To keep large change sets from happening do one of these things:
Enable auto upload of your changes. This will create one small changeset for every answer you give.
Hit the upload button once you're done in one "city". This creates one change set for each category of questions you answered and each of those change sets will only cover the city you just worked in.

Thanks and safe travels
silversurfer83
Ocelotte (2023-07-13 08:35:37+00:00): Yrah I realized that if I make changes for different regions with StreetComplete without giving it the chance to sync in between, all changes end up in the same set.

I don't see how I can delete this changeset. But I'd like to delete it and then recreate the individual regions separately.

Sorry for the trouble amd best regards
silversurfer83 (2023-07-13 09:37:58+00:00): Thanks for reacting :)

Don't worry about it now. It happened and we know you didn't intend it to happen.
You didn't break anything it's just a small annoyance to the people doing QA. It's alright

Happy Mapping :)
eggie (2023-07-11 20:47:54+00:00): Wanneer het echt parkeerhaven zijn is het 
parking=street_side
orientation=parallel

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:orientation

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-11 20:51:41+00:00): lane is eigenlijk overal langs de straatkant waar je kunt parkeren.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane
parking:lane= right left both is nu 'depricated'
Niets is zo vaak veranderd in de wiki als die parkeerplaatsen. 
Van opneming in de hoofdrijbaan.. tot apart intekeken. 
Het laatst nog parking:orientation  .. nu oriantation. 

OSM is rijstebrij...
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-11 20:10:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11040348205
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1188989781

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:33:17+00:00): неугомонний пердун
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:39:48+00:00): стройка блять у тебе?
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:49:48+00:00): Гріх!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:06:32+00:00): ойййоооо........
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:14:39+00:00): засланець!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:30:12+00:00): Шкідливе!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:11:21+00:00): Деморалізуєш
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:17:31+00:00): грішиш знову!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:27:46+00:00): Гріх!
habi (2025-05-28 08:04:32+00:00): Revertiert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166859730
habi (2025-05-28 08:15:08+00:00): Ich in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/708291586#map=19/46.966904/7.377928 geschaut, dass durch die Revertierung keine Daten verloren gingen und habe versucht ein paar Dinge noch zu verbessern.
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-24 17:49:36+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
Street names should not be abbreviated. Otherwise, Your Work Is Good. #OMGuru#OSMcha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138394724
mariotomo (2023-07-15 05:46:12+00:00): hi. Thank you for your new contributions. Please do try to provide more telling comments to your changesets. 
About thus pier, is there a path on it? Then it should be mapped, possibly by adding a highway tag to the pier element. If the path continues on the oppisite site, if you know how it runs, you could consider mapping it, too.
habi (2025-03-25 21:26:05+00:00): Ciao Beat
Das Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1188993158 war mal ein temporäres Migros, das zwar noch auf den ESRI-Bildern zu sehen ist, aber auf allen aktuelleren Bildern (Bern 2023 und swisstopo), sowie im Katasterplan Bern nicht mehr.
Das Gebäude habe ich vor drei Jahren gelöscht, weil es  damals nicht mehr da gewesen ist als ich mit dem Velo vorbeifuhr: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/693557568/history
Du erwähnst hier 'Survey', und swisstopo Fotos,  hast du das Gebäude dort gesehen?
Gruss,
Habi

PS: Ich bin her wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4682240
habi (2025-03-25 21:31:39+00:00): Und: wie schon mehrmals angesprochen (https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4665002&commented) ist es unnötig präzise gezeichnete Gebäude, die aus dem Katasterplan stammen, zusammenzuführen, wie du das hier auch wieder getan hast: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=138394803

Aus meiner Sicht würde ich dein Changeset einfach rückgängig machen, und schauen, dass die Addressdaten am Kappelenring nicht verloren gehen, OK?
Beat Kaeser (2025-03-27 14:50:01+00:00): Ciao Habi

Ich meine zumindest, dass ich damals da ein Gebäude gesehen haben, dessen Umrisse ich dann von Swisstopo Foto übernommen habe. Aber nach fast 2 Jahren ist so ein Detail in mein Gedächtnis nicht mehr zuverlässig. Wenn da heute nur noch Wiese ist, kann es natürlich wieder weg. 

Ich habe Gebäude zusammengefügt, weil vor Ort grosse Wohnblocks zu sehen sind und nicht mehrere eigenständige Häuser. Ich denke das wird auch auf  https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1399505250427528&focus=photo&lat=46.967888&lng=7.377455&z=17 klar. Ich denke, die Karte sollte einzelne Gebäude nur dann zeigen, wenn man das vor Ort auch so vorfindet. Wenn Realität und Katasterplan nicht übereinstimmen, sollten wir der Realität den Vorzug geben. 

Gruss Beat.
habi (2025-05-28 07:49:08+00:00): Revertiert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166858605
habi (2025-05-28 07:59:07+00:00): Ciao Beat
Ich bin am Wochenende extra nochmals hier durchgefahren mit dem Velo.
Das Gebäude ist definitiv hundertprozentig nicht mehr da, und war das auch schon vor Jahren nicht mehr.
Item, ich habe es gelöscht und die Gebäude daneben wieder auseinandergenommen, so wie sie präzise erfasst waren.
Wie gesagt, im Kanton Bern haben wir Zugriff auf die einzelenen Gebäudeumrisse, die auch einzeln erfasst werden.

Alle diese Gebäude haben auch eine einzelne Gebäude-ID vom Bundesamt für Statistik (siehe https://map.geo.admin.ch/#/map?lang=de&center=2595204.1,1201888.3&z=12.079&topic=ech&layers=ch.swisstopo.amtliches-strassenverzeichnis;ch.bfs.gebaeude_wohnungs_register@features=502091434_0&bgLayer=ch.swisstopo.swissimage&featureInfo=default) deshalb werden die (im Kanton Bern) auch *einzeln* erfasst.

Bitte fasse (im Kanton Bern) keine präzis erfassten Gebäude mehr zusammen.

Gruss,
Habi
habi (2025-05-28 08:09:45+00:00): Ich in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166859789 geschaut, dass durch die Revertierung keine Daten verloren gingen und habe versucht ein paar Dinge noch zu verbessern.
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-24 15:45:35+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
Draw just the roof outline of a building, not the entire area.#OMGuru #OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138394842
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:38:10+00:00): тварюка
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:46:16+00:00): Актуалізуєш потроху?
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:51:09+00:00): не гніви Бога!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:53:02+00:00): Це гріх!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:57:36+00:00): уєбень
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:06:06+00:00): Розгніваєш своїми змінами!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:09:24+00:00): засланець!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:14:24+00:00): Москальке ти падло, знову мапу паскудиш?
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:25:37+00:00): Я єбу скільки ти гівна на мапи накидав!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:27:51+00:00): щоб ти більше свої русизми не пхав на мапи!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:36:24+00:00): тварюка
Tomas Straupis (2023-07-12 05:28:03+00:00): iD redaktorius yra labai prastas ir jis siūlo neteisingus taisymus. T.y. warningai yra neteisingi. Nereikia jų klausyti. Atšaukiau sugadinimus.
Tomas Straupis (2023-07-12 05:29:34+00:00): Nereikia tokių mikrodalykų braižyti. Jie neduoda naudos tik prideda sudėtingumo, o dabartiniu atveju dar ir esamus kelius pagadina, nes kažkodėl priklijuoti prie kelių centro linijų.
Violaine_Do (2024-11-26 00:25:02+00:00): Bonjour, mieux vaut ne rien toucher qund on n'est pas sur... effectivement tout déplacer est pas recommandé. Les données viennent du pays et sont a peu pres bonnes en position. Il faut décaler l'imagerie quand ça ne "colle" pas. C'est côté imagerie le bug ;)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138395011
Hufkratzer (2023-07-12 21:21:36+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1188994798
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1067267176
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238526405
sehen von oben NICHT aus wie Reitanlagen (sind auch zu klein), sondern wie Führanlagen; die kann man mit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:animal=horse_walker taggen. Ich habe noch nie jemanden in einer Führanlage reiten sehen.

Und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1030470025
sieht auch nur wie ein Reitplatz (Springplatz) aus.

Es ist leider schwierig, bei dir in der Umgebung eine sinnvoll gemappte Reitanlage zu finden. Die Franzosen machen das allgemein ganz gut, z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/921369145
HellMap (2023-07-11 21:59:24+00:00): Hi!

Please be more careful when deleting existing ways. You left these ways unconnected to the cycleway: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126464298

There were also two cycle route relations that ran along these ways, so they didn't get rerouted. (The ones on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1189004951 now.)

I also fixed some other minor issues.

Since you have just started editing, it's probably best to become more familiar before making major changes in dense areas, especially deleting ways. Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks
Rymdkapsel (2023-07-25 15:44:24+00:00): My bad. I will try to get more accustomed to mapping before making any similar adjustments. 

Thank you for the constructive comment!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:34:14+00:00): грішник!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:42:15+00:00): Москальські імена додаєш? Стройка, тьху! Побійся Бога!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:55:53+00:00): своїми домислами створюєш безлад!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:02:37+00:00): В країні війна, а ти москалькі імена даєш мапі, похуй як вони називаються групою людей, якщо по докам немає таких назв, на вулиці немає таких вказівників і написів - це твоя вигадка! "Стройка", тьху, блять!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:28:07+00:00): хуєсос
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:14:18+00:00): до стінки тебе, гада москальського!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:21:19+00:00): Зупинися, що ти робиш!
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-24 15:38:13+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in-between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
Street names should not be abbreviated#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138395160
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:50:04+00:00): Ти мову не знаєш? Де ти бачив назви які ти створюєш? Підручник граматики тобі в дупу!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:53:59+00:00): грішник!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:01:43+00:00): В країні війна, а ти москалькі імена даєш мапі, похуй як вони називаються групою людей, якщо по докам немає таких назв, на вулиці немає таких вказівників і написів - це твоя вигадка! "Стройка", тьху, блять!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:15:10+00:00): Що ти робиш?
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:17:26+00:00): Біблією тобі по голові!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:23:08+00:00): Стройка у тебе в дупі!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:25:14+00:00): В Церкві розповів як ти даєш москальські назви території?
watmildon (2023-07-11 20:44:16+00:00): This changeset should have the comment: Adding addresses into the greater Phoenix area from the ESRI prepared National Address Database #OSMUSProject377 #phoenixaddress
maro21 (2023-07-16 13:00:38+00:00): Czy to nie to samo co to: https://osm.org/node/4479452278 ?
starsep (2023-07-16 13:25:13+00:00): Masz rację, dzięki! Usunąłem mój duplikat dodając informacje do tamtego punktu
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-24 15:30:53+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138395449
philippec (2023-07-12 05:51:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11040362091
Kan niet op de muur staan.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-11 21:00:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1188997650

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2023-07-19 04:41:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 138572761, 138689811, 138508386, 138530263, 138563870, 138448306, 138443626, 138466177, 138673696, 138693058, 138440582, 138542403, 138629671, 138550049, 138652256, 138589059, 138557129, 138517151, 138561813, 138663307, 138534828, 138642375, 138596063, 138457462, 138524112, 138498769, 138528151, 138610429, 138683125, 138580314, 138474443, 138489449, 138620352, 138637713, 138481813, 138485141, 138645544, 138599143, 138602442, 138566415 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed name changes in Ukraine, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/100629/25
Glassman (2023-07-11 23:34:59+00:00): Is the road marked no trespassing or something similar. If the road is privately owned but people can use it, it could be tagged as operator=* instead of limiting access.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138395910
MitchellSternke (2023-07-12 00:18:19+00:00): Thanks for reviewing. The only visible marking is that it is a private road. I think I misunderstood the usage of the access=private tag after reading up on it. I will revert some of my recent edits.
Glassman (2023-07-12 01:52:22+00:00): Thanks!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:54:20+00:00): просто засранець
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:58:36+00:00): Твої потуги на мапі усі вже коричневі!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:04:02+00:00): Що ти робиш?
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:15:52+00:00): грішиш знову!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:28:33+00:00): стройка блять у тебе?
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:11:53+00:00): Біблію не шануєш!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:18:18+00:00): гівнюк!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:25:57+00:00): Твої зміни на мапах - гівно!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:35:42+00:00): Ти не любиш людей, гівнюк!
Kalepom (2023-07-12 20:53:29+00:00): Bonjour Caboulot,
Quel type d'élément as-tu voulu ajouter ici ? Il semble peu probable qu'il y ait un grand panneau publicitaire (billboard) à cet endroit. S'il s'agit d'un petit panneau, on le décrira plutôt comme advertisign=board https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:advertising=billboard
Si c'est plutôt un panneau d'information, on préférera les attributs décrits ici https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:information=board
caboulot (2023-07-13 08:04:49+00:00): Au temps pour moi, il s’agit bien d'un petit panneau d’affichage (`advertising=board`) public (`access=yes`). C’est corrigé. Merci.
Glassman (2023-07-11 23:36:29+00:00): Could you review this edit? King County claims it as theirs.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138396128
Glassman (2023-07-11 23:49:25+00:00): This doesn't look private either. Can you review these edits? Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138396217
eggie (2023-07-11 21:24:46+00:00): Verkeerd comment... landuse aangepast
Qwajo OSM (2023-07-15 00:23:24+00:00): Hi Russ,can the point building should be transfered to the polygon building to do away with the building inside building error?
danieldegroot2 (2024-02-15 19:14:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9264071477

Would you still know why you tagged COVID Test Centre as clinic; is it because people with (long-)covid are also being treated/rehabilitated there to some degree?

Also, are you sure it still exists with the exact same name? ('test centre')
Test centre is now likely part of clinic, not other way around, but I may be wrong.
b-unicycling (2024-02-17 11:28:07+00:00): Tbh, don't even know if the test centre is still there, I'll try to find out.
user_5359 (2023-07-12 05:48:39+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1189002599./history. Did you know the key https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:intermittent ?
user_5359 (2023-07-12 10:06:41+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1189003933. What is the mean of the tag 璞伦酒店 = 华联国际商贸城 ?
科技骏马 (2023-07-13 01:17:54+00:00): sorry, I'm mistake, correct tag is name=璞伦酒店
MitchellSternke (2023-07-12 00:29:33+00:00): Note that these ways have no trespassing signs posted, so access=private seems appropriate.
nevw (2023-07-12 03:11:09+00:00): Hi
the convention in OSM is to use title case for names instead of upper case.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-12 01:29:19+00:00): Reverting changeset since access tags should be used instead of deleting the ways.

Read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138400557
Fizzie-DWG (2023-07-15 01:46:33+00:00): Hello Bravo Mapper. A couple of questions regarding this changset thanks. By your comments of imagery used, you have mapped the location of an underground cable by use of Esri World Imagery & kml data? However, there seems to be nothing visible in EWI to show a cable location? Also, from what source did you get the kml data? If it was copied from Google Earth, it must be deleted immediately, as we are not permitted to use Google data under any circumstances. Graeme Fitzpatrick, OSMF Data Working Group
Bravo Mapper (2023-07-17 14:17:06+00:00): Dear ,
This is a proposal and engineers of the site said that internet optical cable is burried along the path of the road but today I made sure that it was not.
I will delete it .

Thanks for the comment.
HellMap (2023-07-12 10:02:16+00:00): Hello again,

Have the cycleway signs here changed? This used to be signposted as a segregated cycleway (even if it doesn't have any road surface segregation).

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=385929343752225&focus=photo

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=810117753438689&focus=photo
HellMap (2023-07-14 09:22:08+00:00): I surveyed the location and the signs are still for a segregated cycleway, so I changed it back.
Syl (2023-08-27 16:05:17+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé la suppression du bâtiment. J'ai vérifié sur place, il existe toujours.
Supaplex (2023-07-12 06:52:15+00:00): 為何要刪除工業區內的建築與設施?如有變動請依現況繪製
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138399425
Supaplex (2023-07-12 06:52:06+00:00): 為何要刪除工業區內的建築與設施?如有變動請依現況繪製
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138399452
Supaplex (2023-07-12 06:51:24+00:00): 為何要刪除工業區內的建築與設施?如有變動請依現況繪製
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138399476
Supaplex (2023-07-12 06:51:12+00:00): 為何要刪除工業區內的建築與設施?如有變動請依現況繪製
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138399508
Supaplex (2023-07-12 06:51:00+00:00): 為何要刪除工業區內的建築與設施?如有變動請依現況繪製
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138399548
Supaplex (2023-07-12 06:49:02+00:00): 為何要刪除工業區內的建築與設施?如有變動請依現況繪製
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138399563
Supaplex (2023-07-12 06:43:32+00:00): 請問為何要刪除工業區中建築與設施呢?
如有變動請照現況繪製
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138399602
Supaplex (2023-07-12 06:42:51+00:00): 請問為何要刪除工業區中的道路?如果有變動請照現況繪製
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138399632
Supaplex (2023-07-12 06:42:21+00:00): 請問為何要刪除工業區中的道路?如果有變動請照現況繪製
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138399657
adrianojbr (2023-07-13 23:31:06+00:00): Olá, Thundercel!

Há alguma recomendação nova para incluir restrições de retorno de uma via para ela mesma?

A documentação da wiki ainda é no sentido de não se mapear esse tipo de restrição, conforme https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction, em especial: "Don't map turn restrictions that are the default for a given jurisdiction and are not signed. It is much better to ensure that routing engines embody the regional rule rather than mapping every occurrence as a turn restriction. This applies particularly to unsigned U-turns in Brazil, where using turn restrictions will require hundreds or thousands of restrictions and micro-segmentation of all roads which in turn make editing data hard."

Abraço!
Thundercel (2023-07-14 03:13:05+00:00): Não existe recomendação no OSM, mas sim regras de transito no Brasil que não permitem retorno pela mesma via.
Art. 39 do CTB que "nas vias urbanas, a operação de retorno deverá ser feita nos locais para isto determinados, quer por meio de sinalização, quer pela existência de locais apropriados.
Thundercel (2023-07-14 03:20:29+00:00): Me explica como se poderia fazer retorno nesse ponto se existe até sinalização de faixa contínua se existe 2 faixas de pista de sentido contrário. https://www.google.com.br/maps/@-27.6799767,-48.7039129,3a,75y,15.9h,61.35t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sB3B_YBZ6BCG4BHLzuy1JVw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu
Thundercel (2023-07-14 03:22:40+00:00): Lembro que ali existia sinalização de se permitir retorno. Eu simplesmente alterei para não se permitir.
adrianojbr (2023-07-14 13:07:30+00:00): No local indicado no Street View, há sinalização restringindo a conversão, então está correta a restrição mapeada. Mas o meu questionamento se refere ao que foi feito, por exemplo, na Avenida Bom Jesus de Nazaré (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1189025840).

Isso que em contrariedade ao que está na wiki, ou seja, não se deve mapear proibições de conversão implícitas, as quais não estejam expressamente sinalizadas (vertical ou horizontalmente).

De todo modo, você pretendia adicionar essas restrições de retorno em todos os entroncamentos de vias?