piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-03-14 09:33:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/511497984 v1 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/511497985 v1 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5003152757 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179846106
iandees (2026-03-14 13:39:43+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
eggie (2026-03-15 08:14:05+00:00): Hoi.,
bicycle=no is de default. Je hoeft dat niet toe te voegen.
Wiki
access=no
bus=designated
emergency=yes

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbusway

MVG
eggie
NG218 (2026-03-17 01:16:16+00:00): Was there a way for this change to have been split into several localized changes so that it does not span the whole globe?
iandees (2026-03-14 13:39:55+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
rtfazeberdee (2026-03-15 11:39:26+00:00): Thanks.These are my first edits so not really sure what that means, the link does not show it at all. I did make a mistake of selecting an Area first to site the buillding, not sure I backed out of it properly before selecting the correct function to identify a building within an area. It should be the building between Funchal Bakery and O Cantinho de Portugal
iandees (2026-03-15 15:25:28+00:00): Sorry for not making it clear. The issue occurs when panning the map editor. When you click and drag intending to move the map, it is easy to accidentally click and drag a point instead of clicking the map background. When a point is moved accidentally, it leads to a "spike" in the shapes connected to it.

To avoid this, pay attention to where you click when you want to move the map, and if you see a shape move instead of the map moving, click the undo button (or use the control+Z keyboard shortcut) to undo that action before continuing to move the map.

I should note that issues like this are easy to spot and quick to fix. You're not doing anything wrong, and should continue to enjoy mapping! I only pointed it out so that you can keep an eye out for it in the future.
rtfazeberdee (2026-03-15 16:37:52+00:00): Ok thanks for the clarification. I'll keep adding places when I come across them. i started because I was going to test A Better Route Planner against Google Maps with routes I know
rtfazeberdee (2026-03-15 16:40:55+00:00): Went back to the location and it now shows Moreyoga twice and if I click on the Red pointer to delete it but it shows that whole area so i'm not sure how to delete just the Moreyoga at the top
iandees (2026-03-15 16:47:40+00:00): Of the two "Moreyoga" icons that were on the map, the further north one came from the building shape (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171298981). I resolved that by removing the tags related to Moreyoga from the building shape. Now it's just a plain old building instead of a building and a yoga studio. Thanks for putting Moreyoga in the right spot!
rtfazeberdee (2026-03-15 17:09:15+00:00): Thanks, still showing as 2 more yogas on my screen, i guess the updates take a while to resolve
iandees (2026-03-15 17:24:31+00:00): If you hold shift and reload (a "hard reload") in your browser it should clear up.
rtfazeberdee (2026-03-15 17:56:41+00:00): I've tried it in a different browser (Firefox - i usually use Vivaldi) and its the same with the 2nd Moreyoga higher up.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:58:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
eggie (2026-03-14 09:58:36+00:00): Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution.
greetz, eggie
j_drive (2026-03-14 19:13:33+00:00): This water tap didnt show on my map so added it for convenience of others. Mayb im running an outdated version. Thanks for checking. Ciao, Marco
Interteutones (2026-06-28 17:26:48+00:00): Bonjour, comment avez-vous déterminé le tracé des tranchées ? Les avez-vous cartographiées sur le terrain à l’aide d’un GPS ou d’un LiDAR ?

Cordialement
Taya_S (2026-03-15 10:53:42+00:00): Reverted border edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179892022
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
eggie (2026-03-14 10:04:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Je hebt nu 2x hetzelfde toegevoegd?
Op nr 14 zit ook restaurant  Settebello. Bestaat dat niet meer.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-03-14 10:11:56+00:00): Settebello verwijderd en je info samengevoegd op adresnode 14
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:58:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Taya_S (2026-03-15 10:53:43+00:00): Reverted border edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179892022
Taya_S (2026-03-15 11:02:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19962
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
trial (2026-03-14 20:41:37+00:00): Merci pour les bons commentaires, on sait de suite ce que tu fais.
Si le cheminement est à la fois un cheminement piéton et vélo, si tu prends un footway, il faut ajouter bicycle=yes. Et si une marque de peinture distingue la partie vélo et le partie piéton il faut ajouter segregated=yes.
trial (2026-03-14 20:36:36+00:00): Salut, si tu cartographies le trottoir en filaire, tu dois préciser sur la rue principale (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/664803627 ou une partie de cette voie) que le trottoir est cartographié en séparé (sidewalk:right=separate je suppose, ça dépend du sens de tracé du chemin).
Negreheb (2026-03-30 23:24:41+00:00): Und, damit ich nicht nur negatives schreibe, das sieht gut aus, danke, dass du das angepasst hast! :)
Tomas09 (2026-06-21 15:59:52+00:00): `cycleway=lane` is hier juist wel correct :P
`shared_lane` is als het gewoon een lijntje op de grond is (:
Martin Borsje (2026-06-24 19:16:34+00:00): welk deel bedoel je precies?
Tomas09 (2026-06-27 11:51:50+00:00): Op de weg van Mechelen naar Wahlwiller was de tag al correct maar heb je het veranderd (: Ik heb de weg al terug veranderd maar gewoon dat je het weet :P
Martin Borsje (2026-06-27 21:17:30+00:00): Er staat volgens mij slecht een onderbroken lijn op de grond; geen doorgetrokken lijn, geen bandje, slechts een fietssuggestiestrook, dus...?
Tomas09 (2026-06-27 21:35:07+00:00): vandaar de tag cycleway:both:lane=advisory (: op de wiki is een straat die precies als deze in elkaar zit ook als voorbeeld gegeven.
Martin Borsje (2026-06-27 21:38:57+00:00): Wellicht een verfijning. Maar ik ben er geen voorstander van. Feit is dat er eerst gewoon lane stond en dat is het zeker niet.
TinPetreković (2026-03-16 14:16:27+00:00): The segments that were split unnecessarily have been merged back together in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179954121
Supaplex (2026-03-14 14:48:20+00:00): is there a name for the place?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179849185
crgbsly (2026-03-15 08:42:46+00:00): added
Warin61 (2026-03-16 00:03:15+00:00): Hi,
Relation 20321527 ... first a one member multipolygon relation is data bloat - just put the tag/s on the way and delete the relation. 
However in this case it is an error - the outer has not been added... so I have done that and transferred the tags from the outer way to the relation.
mapnerd🤓 (2026-03-20 00:47:58+00:00): Thanks for this.
BCNorwich (2026-03-17 08:42:42+00:00): Duplicated highway removed, bridges removed.
iandees (2026-03-14 13:40:08+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
bartgron (2026-03-14 19:15:43+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
trial (2026-03-14 20:30:38+00:00): Bonjour, merci de laisser ce point d'adresse (le 46) en paix et de créer un POI pour le barbier vers le mileu du bâtiment, je doute qu'il travaille dehors ;-).
RemiHou (2026-03-15 05:01:44+00:00): Merci pour la précision. La modification a été effectuée.
Stolas123 (2026-03-14 12:03:11+00:00): 感谢
bartgron (2026-03-14 19:16:18+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
bartgron (2026-03-14 19:16:42+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
NG218 (2026-03-17 01:13:51+00:00): Why does this change span beyond Columbia and up into much of the US?
whammo (2026-03-19 10:17:57+00:00): This was supposed to be two changesets, but it looks like JOSM didn't close the first. Apologies!
rhhs (2026-03-14 14:35:00+00:00): There was still an information board about Indonesia outside last time I was there a month ago. Maybe this is the Indonesian ambassador's residence?
Higashimado (2026-03-14 14:15:15+00:00): 您好，OSM 不是测试场，请确保您所作的更改遵循 OSM 的社区规范，并且是在反映真实的地物特征。

请知悉，您的所有变更集均已被撤回：
179849655 179851584 179851974 179852342
Davileci (2026-05-12 06:37:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1540262667 ha quedado dentro de https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12613248, pero pertenece a https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12613244
¿Es correcto mover Vigo de Sarria para que se ajuste a las nuevas fronteras? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182533159
Hugoren Martinako (2026-05-12 07:12:00+00:00): Sí, efectivamente. La posición de los nodos es meramente orientativa dentro de las relaciones administrativas, se pueden, y se deben, mover para que encajen en ellas.
eggie (2026-03-14 12:29:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Pucciotrex30 (2026-05-26 06:47:40+00:00): Ho appena visto che la rotonda disegnata in questo momento è molto più grande di quella che si vede nelle foto satellitari .
Va ridotta oppure si tratta della TERZA versione della viabilità ? Cioè dapprima incrocio a raso , poi rotonda piccola ed adesso rotonda grande ???
eggie (2026-03-14 12:30:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Arthur Piereck (2026-03-14 12:26:22+00:00): please dont edit random residential roads into type=driveway. i live here
DaanLT (2026-03-14 12:50:44+00:00): Ok
SomeoneElse (2026-03-14 14:42:15+00:00): It'd be ever so helpful if the changeset comment was "Fix member role of (way number name or description) in (relation number name or description".
Flynn Marquardt (2026-03-14 16:18:16+00:00): Let explain what I try to do and why I not write relation and way numbers in description:
- many of my edits are fixes in admin bounders found e.g. on https://nightwatch.karlas.si/
- many edits like this one affect only one relation or way, so I think it's unnecessary to mention that in the comment
- the list of changed ways can be very long, do you really want have 20 way ids in the comment?
- I never trust way ids in comments, because I was already misleaded but mistyped ids 
- I'm also often interested in former changes of others, for this I use this script inside the bowser: https://github.com/deevroman/better-osm-org
SomeoneElse (2026-03-15 15:21:15+00:00): None of that changes the fact that replacing "Fix member role." with something that described what you did would be helpful.
NeisBot (2026-03-14 12:24:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/354258344 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Taxi Stand"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-22 17:33:05+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179855414
Carto_Graph (2026-03-15 15:35:33+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, Ограничен ли проезд (знаками, блоками или каким либо другим способом)?
NeisBot (2026-03-14 12:33:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/973355176 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dental clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-22 17:33:10+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180263845
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-03-14 12:33:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/354258344 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Taxi stand"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-22 17:33:13+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179855637
iandees (2026-03-14 13:40:57+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
NeisBot (2026-03-14 12:39:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/354258344 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Taxi stand"

#MapWithoutSpam
GOGO CABS PRIVATE LIMITED (2026-03-14 13:00:57+00:00): Hello OSM team,
     We actually offer Out-station cab service through our website and App, We don't have a taxi stand.

Can you please clarify and guide me with this?
mueschel (2026-03-15 09:44:36+00:00): 

Something went very wrong here. Most of these objects are either markers from your QA tool, or streets that are overlapping with already existing objects.
I reverted this changeset.
NeisBot (2026-03-14 13:00:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/305807380 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Heating and Air office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-22 17:33:18+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180263852
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 10:06:57+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184129360

https://osm.org/changeset/184129360
JakovBušić (2026-03-18 07:51:49+00:00): Wrong hgv restriction that was made in this changeset was fixed in 180043735. #OptimoRoute
Dimitar155 (2026-03-14 14:00:28+00:00): Добавих малко сгради около центъра току-що. Не знам дали ще се покажат при теб веднага.
rhhs (2026-03-15 09:47:18+00:00): Thanks! The village is available on cadastre so would be a good candidate to try out importing building data. I'll be passing through regularly now that it's on the way to Pleven from Sofia.
Dimitar155 (2026-03-15 20:04:21+00:00): You can see Gorna Mitropoliya (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/43.462710/24.461117) for a similar example where the data has been imported from the cadastre. Personally I'm not happy with how it looks and wouldn't want to see something like this in my village. But since this is not my village, you are free to do what you want :).
rhhs (2026-03-16 16:39:17+00:00): Why? Maybe good to discuss this in a forum post (though I won't participate soon: hiking season has started...)
Dimitar155 (2026-03-16 17:02:34+00:00): They have a level of detail which is hard to verify (or justify in some cases) and unneeded in OSM. See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/use-of-cadastral-data-from-on-osm/113018/43.
Fraxi (2026-03-17 09:25:38+00:00): Извинете, нека да изкажа мнение, макар и тук(във форумната тема може би ще е като спам в момента). Значи, това, което се вижда в Горна Митрополия(LOL) е отвратително естетически. Въпреки че е по-добре да бъдат начертани спрямо реалността. От друга страна, аз не виждам смисъл в картографиране на постройки с второстепенно значение като склад, хамбар, "друга производствена сграда" или т.п. За мен имат смисъл стойности за building=* освен "yes", при които изрично искаме да отличаваме типовете сгради. Например аз бих тагвал =apartments, =retail(например ако допълнително в рамките на имота човека има някакъв търговски обект и е нужно да се знае адреса и за него), гаражи от гледна точка на добавяне на адреси за жилищните сгради. Тук целта е да се знае как да се стигне до улица еди кой си номер. И други стойности на сгради, но с ПЪРВОСТЕПЕННО значение. Какво го интересува потребителя да намери улица "Трънка" 21, за да отиде на гости на роднина, че има и "друга производствена сграда" в рамките на имота и е пак със същия адрес?
Fraxi (2026-03-17 09:32:50+00:00): Е, естествено, хубаво е да бъдат начертани и сгради, в които се помещават магазини, както тук Митко е направил. Но има и ненужни неща.
NeisBot (2026-03-14 13:09:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13647454195 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Real estate office"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Immobilienbüro"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-22 17:33:23+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180263860
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
juminet (2026-03-16 08:14:12+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM!

Vous avez ajouté un magasin nommé "Magasin Japan Koi". Comme vous n'avez mis que le nom, il risque de ne pas apparaitre sur la carte, et sera manquant des applications utilisant les données OSM dans le filtre "magasin". 

Pour le voir apparaitre, il faut au minimum ajouter le tag "shop=yes", mais vous pouvez préciser le type de magasin en suivant la page de documentation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:shop. 

Bonne continuation et happy mapping,
juminet
B252697 (2026-03-14 13:31:03+00:00): Official Map from Singapore National Parks Board (had referenced while editing): https://www.nparks.gov.sg/docs/default-source/parks-docs/west-coast-park/west-coast-park-map.png
Bartek444 (2026-06-08 19:04:30+00:00): zachowaj większą ostrożność przy edytowaniu
W tej edycji został przesunięty żywopłot przez całą miejscowość, zakładam, że przez przypadek. Już poprawiłem. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1467265152/history/2