piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
f_husni (2024-07-25 10:33:59+00:00): Hallo. saya melihat anda banyak sekali merubah kelas jalan menjadi trunk padahal setelah saya lihat di peta kepmen, rata2 jalan yang anda rubah masih belum tersambung. hal ini akan memengaruhi data navigasi di osm. sebagai solusi tetap di rubah ke kelas sebelum nya dan ditambahkan tag tambahan planned:highway=trunk  dan jika jalan sudah mulai beroperasi baru jalan2 tsb dirubah ke kelas trunk. terimakasih
Frans S (2024-06-26 09:06:49+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
However, Avoid to connect nodes of buildings to a highway.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153188912
Frans S (2024-06-26 09:11:03+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Inaccurate mapped.

Buildings not squared.

Connected nodes to other buildings.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153189151
Francesco Zanaboni (2024-06-26 08:02:29+00:00): il changeset si riferisce allo stabilimento Chromavis Fareva, è ampio perché ho toccato il multipoligono landuse=agricolture (che andrà fixato prima o poi)
Leo Slager (2024-06-26 11:18:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
GSF1200S (2025-05-09 03:44:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/942813847

大佬,是不是手抖？=)
Nathan_A_RF (2024-08-03 07:04:03+00:00): Are you absolutely sure this is the A331? Why does it dead-end here?
kmpoppe (2024-08-03 08:58:14+00:00): Hi Nathan,

it's been a hot long while since I've been in the area, this change originated from the note also referenced in the CS, https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4304490.

OP claims that this part is A331 and ends at Frimley Street Bridge.

I have no means of checking myself, if this needs to be changed back to not being the A331, by all means, please do.

Thanks!

K
silversurfer83 (2024-06-26 17:39:45+00:00): Moin

Hast du eine schriftliche Freigabe der Stelle, die die Rechte an dem Plan hat?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153190167
silversurfer83 (2024-07-01 21:10:27+00:00): Da auch auf Nachfrage per DM keine Reaktion erfolgte habe ich diese Änderung rückgängig gemacht

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153429826
Frans S (2024-06-26 09:03:22+00:00): Hello. See my comments on another changeset.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153190230
Frans S (2024-06-26 09:01:52+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.

Mappings oversized.

Connected nodes to other features.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153190361
Frans S (2024-06-26 09:00:09+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Inaccurate mapped.

Included yard .

Buildings not squared.

Connected nodes of buildings to other features.

Quality prevails above quantity !

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153190384
Frans S (2024-06-26 08:55:54+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------
Buildings not squared.
Nodes of buildings connected to other buildings.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153190439
mcliquid (2024-06-26 08:51:06+00:00): Grüßt euch und vielen Dank für eure Ergänzungen!
ashs_as (2024-06-27 13:59:32+00:00): Hello JFL-75;
We noticed you added more than 100 highways overlapping another street that already existed before, from our end, we removed and fixed this issue in this changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153249303
Also, we noticed you added more than 400 polygons with tags (taskid- taskStatus, etc )
Could you please check this and fix it?
Regards
ashs_as
JFL-75 (2024-06-27 17:21:28+00:00): Hi ashs_as,I am a bit confused by your post...It is weird because I did not make so much modifications at once. Moreover, I  I cannot load this changeset on my PC to check and fix, my RAM is overloaded. 
Kindly yours. 
JFL-75
ashs_as (2024-07-02 09:07:56+00:00): Hello JFL-75;
User mueschel removed the polygons with tags (taskid- taskStatus, etc ) in this changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153259453
Also, I removed the buildings that were duplicated in this changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153445232
Regards
ashs_as
Frans S (2024-06-26 08:57:34+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153190981
miluethi (2024-06-30 20:29:32+00:00): Edmond,

Your building shapes are far too big compared to the aerial imagery. Please narrow down your shapes.

I'm going to revert your last changeset.
AlkalIn (2024-06-27 11:09:40+00:00): Cher Marie Ngonge,
Je constate que vous avez converti des relations correspondant a de larges zones de foret en zones résidentielle. Comme celle-ci. Il s'agit ici d'une foret et non de zone résidentielle. Svp faites attention a bien garder un tag de landuse ou natural qui soit correct. Je corrige certaines de ces erreurs.
Merci,
Alkalin
XZH@CHD (2024-06-27 02:34:03+00:00): Why do you think my modified ref tag is wrong? What ref tag should be used to distinguish the two independent one-way roads, US101-S and US101-N? Both road‘s ref tag are US101, but I only want to extract one of them. How can this be achieved?
A_Prokopova_lyft (2024-06-27 10:48:20+00:00): Hi XZH@CHD!
I’m Anastasia, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for your question.
According to the OSM wiki page, the 'ref' tags shouldn’t include cardinal directions in their values (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging#:~:text=The%20name%20and%20ref%20tags%20should%20not%20contain%3A). 
Instead, the cardinal direction is indicated in the route relation: e.g.https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/108619  (US 101 North) and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/71162  (US 101 South). 
So if you need to distinguish between the two one-way roads, you can refer to the route relations for the specific directions. 
Best regards!
XZH@CHD (2024-06-27 13:12:11+00:00): Thank you for your answer, but I would like to ask how to select the longitude and latitude after drawing this relationship road segment through
<query type="relation">
<id-query type="relation" ref="71162"/>
</query>
this operation. I tried the operation but it always failed. Can you give the corresponding operation XML code?
A_Prokopova_lyft (2024-06-28 10:59:06+00:00): Hi,
I'm sorry, but this falls outside of my expertise. The OSM team at Lyft handles map fixes exclusively.
Best regards, 
Anastasia
felipeeugenio (2024-06-26 13:07:05+00:00): Hola. Por favor cuidado con realinear todos los caminos con la foto satelital que está observando. Esa foto es circunstancial. Hay varios proveedores de fotos, todas con alineaciones distintas. Incluso las fotos de un mismo proveedor cambian de alineación el tiempo, dependiendo del zoon y entre fotos de una misma capa.  Entonces nadie sabe realmente cual es la correcta.
Lo menciono para que no haga el esfuerzo solo para que en unos meses alguien lo cambie todo otra vez.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153192445
IreuN (2024-06-29 23:34:53+00:00): Hej, czy velo sprotavia na pewno powinna być oznaczona jako highway=track ? Dalej na południe jest też jeden odcinek oznaczony jako w budowie, z uwagą, że już otwarty - mógłbyś to sprawdzić/potwierdzić/zedytować? :)
panwalen (2024-07-01 11:33:46+00:00): Hej, zmieniłem na cycleway. Wydaje mi się że wszystkie odcinki są oznaczone jako otwarte, jak widzisz ten zamknięty to otwórz go proszę.
IreuN (2024-07-01 11:37:21+00:00): Dzięki, też mi się tak wydaje już :) Zamknąłem uwagi o których mówiłem.
FennecusZerda (2024-07-01 08:29:38+00:00): Hi Hans. Hope you enjoy your stay in Norway. Love the username. :) We have a mapping rule in Norway where shared cycle and pedestrian ways are not mapped as bicycle=designated. As that is implied in highway=cycleway. We have done a mass change across Norway to correct this. iD is not good in that regards, and the community have reported this to the developers of the editor. Thanks, and keep up the good work. Regards, Trond
Reference: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/No:Map_Features#Sykkel
Hans Wurst (2024-07-01 08:48:05+00:00): Hi Trond,
thank you for your information. Sorry, I didn't know that special Norwegian rule. I will bear this in mind in the future.
Jeg liker Norge (land og folk) ;-)
eggie (2024-09-01 07:22:00+00:00): Shantos.. Vraag om BAG import via het forum.
gr eggie
josmougn (2026-05-31 23:18:06+00:00): bonsoir
Quelle source pour cette borne km ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12012147354 ? 
On ne voit rien sur le terrain.
AurélienQ (2026-06-01 08:13:06+00:00): Bonjour,
Les pk viennent de l'open data sncf. J'ai corrélé aux pk des PN, ADV, signaux, etc... qui eux sont visible sur imagerie.

J'en ai conclu que la précision linéaire des pk est correcte (plus ou moins 1 ou 2 mètres, bien que la précision sur la largeur n'est pas très bonne (plus ou moins 5 mètres).

J'en avais discuté un peu, je sais plus avec qui, et on était tombé d'accord pour dire "allons y". 

Celle que tu mentionne se trouvant dans un tunnel, les pk ne se voient pas. Généralement, ça se voit peu (par exemple ici en pleine voie en alignement, dégagée, de jour : https://www.google.com/maps/@47.660087,1.2703072,3a,15y,116.51h,85.45t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1szTB1TQEFj3ixoGynV98VrA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D4.554599269677681%26panoid%3DzTB1TQEFj3ixoGynV98VrA%26yaw%3D116.51412464392534!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDUyNy4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
Je te laisse alors imaginer les difficultés pour voir ces pk en tunnel à grande vitesse.
josmougn (2026-06-01 14:07:10+00:00): Merci. Il manque cette info open data sncf dans la source du changeset.
C'est quoi PN ? ADV ?

Le point que je mentionne est dans le bois assez loin du tunnel : est-ce que je peux le déplacer dans le tunnel ?
(j'en ai vu d'autres comme ça assez loin du tunnel ou des rails, ce qui donne l'impression que ce sont des erreurs).
AurélienQ (2026-06-01 15:48:31+00:00): Pardon 😅 je me suis emballé
PN=Passage à Niveau
ADV=Appareil de Voie (aiguillage)

Pour la source, tu as raison, je l'ajoute.
En fait, c'est ce que je disais, la précision des données dans le sens linéaire est correcte, mais dans la perpendicularité beaucoup moins, et je n'ai pas trouvé le moyen facile d'aligner des nodes sur des ways. De fait, ici il est un peu décalé.

Je vais réfléchir avec JOSM pour trouver une manip pour le faire facilement et rapidement, maintenant qu'on en parle j'ai deux trois idées à essayer. J'ai presque envie de dire, ne t'embête pas trop, car il y a un point tout les 10 mètres, si tu veux tous les recaler 1 par 1 ça va être long.

Je te tiens au courant
Sanniu (2024-06-27 08:18:36+00:00): Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1296327686 is added over existing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241507778 - which one is real?
Sanniu (2026-02-18 07:18:03+00:00): BTW, why the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549032025 is not car-accesible?
mavl (2024-11-13 06:16:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159077163 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
Đuro Jiří (2024-06-26 12:42:18+00:00): Salve,solo una domanda.
Noleggio bici "Bike stop" è solo per ospiti dell'albergo, oppure per tutti?
Hotel Millepini (2024-06-27 07:16:17+00:00): Buongiorno, si il servizio è riservato agli ospiti dell'hotel.
Đuro Jiří (2024-06-27 10:30:57+00:00): Corretto, grazie
woodpeck (2024-06-26 11:05:10+00:00): Dear olivejoh, in this changeset you have added over 1000 buildings. You claim to have used the source "PCN2012" but many of the buildings you have added are not visible on this imagery. It appears that you have imported the data from some other data source. Data imports must be discussed with the OSM community beforehand, and the source (and its license) must be clearly stated. I will revert this import.
Leo Slager (2024-06-26 11:22:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-06-26 11:27:18+00:00): Dag Joyce,

Ongetwijfeld is het goed bedoeld.
Een footway is alleen toegankelijk voor voetgangers. Dan is het niet de bedoeling om daar nog eens foot=yes bij te taggen.
Kwaad kan het overigens niet.
kapazao (2024-06-26 17:14:16+00:00): Hola, al editar edificios fíjate si están hechos basándose en la capa de Catastro, ya que así es como deberían estar y después deberían posicionarse con imágenes PNOA en la base del edificio.
En este caso he visto que has editado algunos sin fijarte en esto y los has dibujado incorrectamente por su azotea, lo cual es incorrecto, ya que hay que tener en cuenta la inclinación de las imágenes, y si los dibujamos en cuanto a su base no habrá problema cuando estas se actualicen ni se montarán a otros elementos.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153197002
suir96 (2024-06-28 11:31:29+00:00): Hola.
Es verdad, no me había fijado en la capa de Catastro.
Intenté añadir más detalles en torno a esta vía, sobre todo en cuanto al tipo de tráfico permitido y las conexiones entre las vías.
Me di cuenta de que al planificar rutas con Komoot había algunos errores.
Gracias por tus comentarios.
Un saludo.
Erelen (2024-06-27 01:42:09+00:00): Very, very bad practice: ignoring dialog & arguments (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152730077). Just silent revert & redraw.

It looks like a conscious preference for a war of edits over any other solution :(
Erelen (2024-06-28 01:21:18+00:00): Next time you remake it to your great liking, please don't break the routing. :(
Fixed in 153271100
5m4u9 (2024-06-27 04:28:03+00:00): hola, gracias por actualizar. En el sector la imagen satelital esta un poco desplazada y antes de editar hay que corregir. De todos modos, no era mucho desplazamiento, ya lo solucioné.
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-26 11:05:14+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 153196669.
silversurfer83 (2024-06-27 06:58:46+00:00): Hi :)

danke, dass du Willingen besser machst!

Eine Hinweis hätte ich für dich: Viele deiner Grasflächen sind vermutlich kein "natural=grassland" sondern eher sowas wie "landuse=grass" oder "lu=flowerbed". Check mal das Wiki dazu:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:natural%3Dgrassland

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153197365
Heavyopenmetal (2024-07-01 07:14:36+00:00): Hi. 
Sehr gerne. Danke Dir für den Hinweis und den Link. Ich werde nochmal über meine letzten Einträge drüber schauen.
LG :)
jb54osm (2024-06-29 10:50:47+00:00): Dag Leo,

Ik heb "Kleine Feith" op een nieuw buildingpart gezet. Kleine Feith is alleen het nieuwe appartementendeel. De rest is al langer bestaande cultuur en sport.

In mijn jongere jaren wist ik dit slechts op te lossen door een node ;-) . Grote Feith (hoger) doe ik hierna.
Aleh Aliakseyenka (2024-06-26 11:11:29+00:00): Driveway based on 
National Agriculture Imagery Program
mavl (2024-11-13 06:16:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159077163 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
SekeRob (2024-08-30 08:20:27+00:00): Hi

I've deleted the 2 member farmland relation on areas with buildings since the surrounding farmland parts were deleted. (Most looks more like vineyards, but that's all I can judge from above. Best practise is you map the individual plots which makes all these complex multipolygons superfluous anyway.

happy mapping.
SekeRob (2024-08-30 08:29:35+00:00): Errata... actually the deletions were in this CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153109443 "rimosso terreno agricolo ". No alerts remain in the area by OSMI momentarily. My cleaning of the MP was here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155961383#map=19/45.865182/10.939339
CCCGGG (2024-08-30 08:31:14+00:00): Ok.

Yes, there are mostry vineyards. 
(I've planned some surveys in the area during the next weeks to check some details to finish the mapping)
Davie Dean (2024-07-07 23:05:29+00:00): Hey adster546, these aren't bike racks, they are barriers to protect people leaving an exit from opening a door into pedestrians walking by.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-21 07:36:01+00:00): Hello!

You used
horse=yessS
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/483535526/history

Have you maybe meant
horse=yes
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
mavl (2024-11-13 06:16:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159077163 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
five40 (2024-06-26 17:42:09+00:00): Dort wurde auch ein Straßenschild mit "Lars-Vogt-Brücke" aufgestellt. Demnach ist die Straße über die Brücke nicht Kleestraße.
kapazao (2024-06-26 17:04:05+00:00): Hola, si quieres añadir vallas o muros exteriores tan solo tienes que añadir estos como una línea nueva, pero no dividas lo que ya hay, en este caso el parque, que ha sido destrozado y puesto un multipolígono innecesario. Así se pierde el histórico y se hace mucha más compleja su edición. Ten cuidado al dividir elementos y ten en cuenta esto.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153199534
kapazao (2024-06-26 17:08:51+00:00): Esto ha sido corregido en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153213140
suir96 (2024-06-28 11:39:07+00:00): Hola.
Gracias por la corrección y los consejos.
Estuve leyendo la wiki de OSM al hacer los cambios, pero se me escaparon estos detalles.
Menos mal que estás atento ante estos errores.
Tomo nota y tendré más cuidado con estos detalles en el futuro. Consultaré también el foro de la comunidad de OSM y me informaré mejor antes de hacer tantas ediciones.
Saludos.
flohoff (2024-06-26 14:25:20+00:00): Moin,
willkommen bei OSM und cool das du mit mappst.
Ich habe den changeset gesehen.

Das mit dem "name" ist immer ein wenig deffizil. In den "name" tag kommen nur wirkliche "Eigennamen" - keine Beschreibende Dinge. D.h. sowas wie "Gebäudeteil E" oder so gehört da nicht rein.

Gebäudeteile sollten in ein "ref" tag.

Dazu kommt das du hier das Landeskirchenamt eingetragen hast - building=yes + name=Landeskirchenamt - Damit sagt OSM das das GEBÄUDE so heist. 

Also sowas wie "Villa Hammerschmidt" - Das ist natürlich quatsch. 

Also besser wäre es einen "Node" in das Gebäudeoutline zu legen mit der Addresse

office=religion
name=Landeskirchenamt

Und auf das Gebäude dan ref=E oder sogar local_ref=E 

Guck mal im Wiki was es da so zu ref/loc_ref/name gibt.

Flo
flohoff (2024-06-26 14:38:15+00:00): Moin,
hier habe ich jetzt gesehen das das Landeskirchenamt 4 mal übereinander gezeichnet ist.

Ein Gebäude mit Addresse - die anderen nur so mit teiltags übereinander.

Wenn du mehr mit Gebäuden machen willst dann solltest du auch mal gucken wie du in deinen Editor die ALKIS (Liegenschafskataster) bekommst. Denn 99% der Gebäude sind aus den Amtlichen Daten des Liegenschaftskatasters (In NRW) und damit Centimeter genau - Das kriegst du vom Luftbild gar nicht hin. Also bevor du da viele Gebäude "korrigierst" nach Luftbild. 

Flo