piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
AurélienQ (2025-11-13 13:12:59+00:00): Ah, problème de communication je crois 😅
Apparemment ta modification a été motivée conjointement avec @woshilapin, qui m'a envoyé un message pour me demander quelles étaient mes sources pour cette modif. Je pensais que vous vous teniez un peu au courant, mais je vais copier le message que je lui ai envoyé pour expliquer à tous, dit moi si ca te convient :

Bonjour,

Je comprends tes interrogations. Ces modifications sont liées au chantier de la ligne nouvelle roissy-picardie au nord de l’aéroport. Cette voie a été supprimée il y a quelques mois, j’ai pu constater effectivité de cette suppression il y deux semaines alors que je me suis rendu sur place. Par ailleurs, ma source concernant les autres appareils de voies et jonctions, est simplement que j’ai eu l’occasion de visiter le chantier. J’ai donc pu observer le terrain. Il est possible que certains appareils de voies n’étaient pas encore en place lors de mes modifications, toutefois leurs mise en place étaient imminente d’après les informations du chef de chantiers.

Je me porte entièrement garant de ces modifications que j’ai constatés sur place, et que tu peux par ailleurs aller vérifier en personne. Le principal sujet de ton message, si je comprend bien, est la suppression de la voie 2B, elle est supprimée pour pouvoir créer un quai supplémentaire. Il en est fait mention sur différents articles internets. Cf un post parlant de la visite : https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ingenieur-ferroviaire_visiteaffi-activity-7387511833290756098-qtNn?utm_source=social_share_send&utm_medium=member_desktop_web&rcm=ACoAAFL5q0IBs1_HTCWwRqYBp7a93xfmYa63Mm8

Par ailleurs je pense que tu connais comme moi la non-exactitude et la latence de mise-à-jour des données SNCF.

J’espère t’avoir rassuré, dis-moi si tu veux des infos complémentaires.

Aurélien
Tristramg (2025-11-13 13:38:53+00:00): Oups,

Clairement je suis le fautif dans cette affaire, on s’est mal compris avec mon collègue qui a fait ce qu’il fallait faire.

Merci pour la réactivité et tous les détails. Je propose de revert mon changset (en attendant ta confirmation pour ne pas re-foncer tête baissée).

Et plus généralement merci pour tes contributions ferroviaires, je vois souvent ton nom ;)
AurélienQ (2025-11-13 14:28:59+00:00): Tu as mon approbation ! 
Ne t'inquiète pas, les erreurs arrivent à tous, c'est humain. C'est tout l'intérêt des projets collaboratifs.
D'ailleurs si jamais tu vois une erreur de ma part, n'hésite pas à me le signaler pour que je ne la refasse pas ; )

Bonne journée
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:35:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
ratrun (2025-11-12 19:16:49+00:00): Hallo!

Eine Buslinie auf bestehenden Straßen muss in der Relation die bestehenden Straßen einbinden und darf nicht auf einer neuen, parallen gezeichneten Straße verlaufen! 
Ich habe daher die neue, überflüssige Straße https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1449462668 gelöscht und die Segmente in die Buslinienrelation aufgenommen. Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19827369
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
bxl-forever (2025-11-14 00:59:57+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Interesting edit.  I see you wanted a review.

When a path is shared between pedestrians and cyclists, it is always useful to add the "segregated" tag.

If you see a D9 roadsign (cyclists and pedestrians each have their own part), you can add "segregated=yes".

If you see a D10 roadsign (everyone shares the same area), we add "segregated=no".
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:35:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
mavl (2025-12-09 02:21:25+00:00): Здравствуйте. Номер дома записывают в виде 83 с2.
NatalieVvln (2025-12-13 15:45:30+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за уточнение. Учту в дальнейшей работе.
Sakari_N (2025-11-14 17:33:42+00:00): Moi ja tervetuloa openstreetmappiin!

Olet merkannut laajalta alueelta polkuihin ja teihin access=no tai muuta vastaavaa kulkukieltoa. Mihin kielto perustuu? En nyt itse keksi miksi näillä poluilla ja teillä ei saisi pyöräillä tai kävellä.
Sakari_N (2025-11-15 20:35:10+00:00): Moi,

Selvittelin tätä asiaa enkä löytänyt näille mitään päteviä perusteita. Osa muokkauksistasi on luonnosuojelualueen sisäpuolella, osa ulkopuolella. En myöskään löytänyt mitään tietoa siitä, että näillä luonnonsuojelualueilla ei saisi liikkua. Ainoastaan suositeltiin varomaan kivikeskun häiritsemistä pesimäaikaan.

Jos en kuule sinulta asiasta, niin tulen kumoamaan nämä muokkaukset virheellisinä.
Sakari_N (2025-11-19 20:06:55+00:00): Moi,

Kumosin nämä (ja muutkin alueelle tekemäsi) muutokset virheellisinä. Kuitenkin jos osm:n muokkaus kiinnostaa, niin alla on jotain lueskeltavaa oikein kartoittamisesta.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:42:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321503 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Mali
VictorIE (2026-04-15 03:04:02+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440735703/

building:levels:underground=3 seems like a lot. :)
jonnymccullagh (2026-04-15 07:36:39+00:00): I have zero recollection of doing that edit, and it feels like a weird edit for me to make. Fixing it now, thanks for the catch.
VictorIE (2026-04-15 08:13:48+00:00): "I have zero recollection of doing that edit" - I often feel like that. 

Sometimes about the previous day's edits. :( :D
limes11 (2025-11-12 18:17:57+00:00): Hallo, 

bitte nicht für den Renderer mappen. Wie es auf der Karte aussieht, hat keinen Einfluss darauf, wie es erfasst werden sollte.

Es gibt Diskussion darüber, ob "name" hier angebracht ist

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/name-fur-regenruckhaltebecken/119914

Wenn das tatsächlich vor Ort eine entsprechende Bezeichnung trägt, dann ist ref in Ordnung. Wenn das aber lediglich eine informelle Beschreibung ist, würde ich das eher unter description erfassen.

Schöne Grüße
I_am_the_lazy_wanderer (2025-11-12 18:34:42+00:00): Genau die von dir genannte Diskussion hat mich inspiriert, denn dort wird "ref" bevorzugt.
Vermutlich ist das eine Bezeichnung der zuständigen Behörden, aber der Normalbürger will garnicht wissen, ob das nun "RHB Sitzstadt 1" oder "RHB Sitzstadt 2" ist. Deshalb ist "ref" auch passender als "desc", finde ich.
I_am_the_lazy_wanderer (2025-11-12 18:40:49+00:00): Ach, jetzt habe ich die zwei anderen RHB in der Nähe genannt... Aber die Begründung bleibt gleich. "RHB Hammer Bach" wird eine Bezeichnung in den Listen der Behörden sein, also "ref".
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:45:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321633 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - United States
nevw (2025-11-12 21:19:04+00:00): I have reverted this changeset which changed the Leach Highway motorway to a path in Kewdale.
wuff57 (2026-06-20 10:11:17+00:00): Hallo Günter-CW, ich bin gerade über ein mapping von Dir gestolpert, wo StreetComplete vielleicht nicht die Situation vollständig erkennt hat. Es geht um den Weg osm.org/way/23299524. Der ist m.E. ein unechte Einbahnstraße (siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:oneway#Unechte_Einbahnstra%C3%9Fen ), weil es dort kein Einbahnstraßenschild (Vz 220) gibt. Ich hatte deshalb vor einiger Zeit das oneway-tag weggenommen und eine no_entry-Relation am östlichen Ende eingeführt. Du hattest das oneway-tag dann wieder hinzugefügt und ohne den Weg in der Gegenrichtung für Fahrräder freizugeben. Also, bei diesen unechten Einbahnstraßen muss man vorsichtig sein, ob es nicht eine Relation type=restriction, restriction=no_entry gibt. Ich weiss nicht, ob StreetComplete die versteht. Ich hab die Relation jetzt rausgenommen, weil sie auch andere Leute verwirrt hat, und nur das östliche Ende als Einbahnstraße, frei für Fahrräder, getaggt. Viele Grüße, wuff57
eggie (2025-11-14 09:28:44+00:00): Dan kun je beter oneway=yes taggen op het betreffende wegdeel. Zo'n bord doet niets in de routering.
Wel de uitzonderingen toevoegen als die genoemd worden in een onderbord.
oneway:bicycle=no

MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-14 05:36:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13299983061

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
scrambling_panda (2025-11-14 14:32:34+00:00): Looking at this, I just noticed that we have two Uptown Theatres (both the node and the building), both with address 2900, and there’s now also a third node with addresss 2900 - the disused shop in the corner.

I think that’s the ticket office now?

So maybe we should:
- Remove the “Uptown Theater” name from the building to avoid confusion
- Delete the disused shop in the corner
- Keep the uptown theater node as the main thing

WDYT?
Dodko (2025-11-13 10:57:23+00:00): Určite má chodník šírku 5 metrov?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-03 20:08:10+00:00): what kind of traces, if any, remain in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54178637/history#map=19/43.071824/-76.165397&layers=N area for that railway=abandoned ?

related to https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5077798
RussNelson (2025-12-03 20:56:04+00:00): Tracks in the pavement 200' to the south, the shape of the building, and the obvious railbed going north eventually joining to active tracks.
VLD549 (2025-11-17 16:10:08+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes.
DIKS is mapped to be at the address Spoetnik 2, but the site indicates Kosmonaut 26.     https://diks.net/en/locations

Could you elaborate? I don't know how to change it. Thank you!
kOSMofant (2025-11-17 19:46:04+00:00): Thank you for your reply. My mistake. I updated the company name, but apparently overlooked the fact that they moved to another building 200 meters away. I have now corrected this to the new address.
alpacaMaps (2026-07-28 01:29:50+00:00): This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.

If these cameras are real, please let us know so the map stays accurate. Otherwise, we'd kindly ask that you avoid adding cameras that aren't actually there, and that you remove any temporary or test nodes once you're done.

If this was simply a mistake, no problem at all — just clean up the nodes that don't correspond to a real-world camera, and leave a quick note here so we can help.

Thanks for helping keep OpenStreetMap accurate.

— alpacaMaps
aTarom (2025-11-12 20:10:10+00:00): Please, no mezcles survey_point con el peak Punta Grosín, restaurado.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
BCNorwich (2025-11-13 07:25:47+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Review, placing a footpath highway on top of an existing service road, (highway Way: 328465346) makes for duplication of highways. Two highways on the same line, this duplication could cause disruption of routing. The one highway can hold in it's tags all information pertaining to the service road and the PRoW. I've now made this amendment removing the extra highway, it's here:- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/328465346#map=18/53.211465/-1.925098&layers=N 

If you need more clarification or any other help please just ask, in the comments here or message me.

Regards Bernard.
Comino (2025-11-12 18:15:45+00:00): For instagram, please use proper tag:

contact:instagram=
saunter (2025-11-12 19:09:09+00:00): Thanks, fixed
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-14 05:36:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13295247622

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2025-11-12 17:42:35+00:00): Hi HAPKOMAHcer, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 highway(s)
- 4 building(s)
- 1 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174570720
HAPKOMAHcer (2025-11-12 18:18:45+00:00): I wanted to add the tag Рэчыца to all buildings in the city of Rechitsa. However, after adding it, duplicates appeared. After that, I reverted the changes. How can I add a tag to buildings through JOSM? I have the entire database of buildings in Rechitsa, but when I try to add the tag, it just creates duplicates.
JeroenHoek (2025-11-12 19:20:55+00:00): Adresdata mag gedupliceerd worden wanneer dat nodig is, maar ik denk niet dat leisure=ice_rink op dat hokje hoort.

Gebruik daar club=sport met sport=ice_skating.
molensteen (2025-11-13 21:13:09+00:00): scherp, dank u wel JeroenHoek
bartgron (2025-11-26 20:41:28+00:00): Usunięto:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175171684
NeisBot (2025-11-12 18:06:41+00:00): Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added tertiary road"
NeisBot (2025-11-12 18:06:41+00:00): Hi Cheetah Indian, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
user_5359 (2025-11-13 08:00:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition!

You only added the name of a business to the building, but did not note that there is also a business there.  If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://wiki.osm.org.
Interswd (2025-11-13 13:36:40+00:00): W tej zmianie usunąłeś las poprzez multipoligon. Jeśli  nie znasz zasad działania multipoligonów uważaj na przyszłość na takie edycje. Już zostało to naprawione przez innego usera.
morsiu (2025-11-13 16:35:05+00:00): Przepraszam, ta zmiana miała nie wejść w życie, nie cofnąłem przed rozpoczęciem prac w innym miejscu.
sab27 (2025-12-29 15:40:05+00:00): Hi AL0106 you added almost 30 buildings here - none exist on any imagery. Please don't add buildings if there is no evidence for them. Please use Bing and always check the instructions tab. Ask for help if you need any :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174572283
sab27 (2025-12-29 15:32:11+00:00): Hi AL0106, I removed these buildings as there is no evidence of them in any imagery source. Please make sure to use Bing imagery here - thanks and please keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174572557
NeisBot (2025-11-12 18:32:35+00:00): Hi HAPKOMAHcer, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174572569
NeisBot (2025-11-12 18:33:35+00:00): Hi HAPKOMAHcer, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features!?

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174572595
NeisBot (2025-11-12 18:39:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Gym in Toulouse"
NeisBot (2025-11-12 18:39:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-12 18:39:44+00:00): Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ta description pourrait être : « Gym à Toulouse »
---
(Auto-translation)
TrumanBlurbank (2025-11-12 18:45:31+00:00): Thank you and sorry, this is my first time contributing to OSM. I will change the description to the short version ;)
scrambling_panda (2025-11-15 07:18:13+00:00): Reverted in 174675506 after discussion with strongthany
scrambling_panda (2025-11-15 07:18:19+00:00): Reverted in 174675506 after discussion with strongthany
eggie (2025-11-12 20:21:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
DaveF (2025-12-14 16:57:05+00:00): Refrain from making edits of which yo have no understanding.
rempshaener (2025-11-12 20:20:31+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Eine Anmerkung zu deinen Bearbeitungen: 
Das Feld "couplings" bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten leer, da es sich um die „Angabe der vorhandenen Anzahl an Schlauchanschlüssen“ handelt, siehe osm.wiki/DE:Key:couplings?uselang=de. Unterflurhydranten haben in der Regel nur mit Standrohr eine Schlauchkupplung. 

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
bigphil9511 (2025-11-13 16:24:44+00:00): Moin, danke für den Hinweis, ich habe es korrigiert. 👍
yelisey90 (2026-01-04 22:22:24+00:00): thnx!
formfeed (2025-11-12 19:14:03+00:00): Of course Northwest not South West
Udarian (2025-11-13 01:22:39+00:00): The ALPR added in this changeset is inside of a roads area, that makes the position unlikely to be correct, please move it to the correct position.
Inspectorchallenger (2025-11-13 01:30:08+00:00): It’s not on a road but pointed inward on to target parking to scan all cars going in to shop there
Udarian (2025-11-13 18:09:38+00:00): the following screenshot shows that this ALPR is in the middle of the road as per Bing, and this applied to all of the other aerial imagery available in the area. So yes, it is highly unlikely that it's current position is correct.

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Udarthegreat/public-sources/refs/heads/main/other/Screenshot%202025-11-13%20125406.png

Happy mapping,
Udar
AndyB_66 (2025-11-15 19:14:01+00:00): Stosuj się, proszę, do zasad komentowania zestawów zmian, obowiązujących w społeczności OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-12 21:49:47+00:00): This appears to be in an intersection; usually Flock cameras are mounted on vertical poles.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174575732
WP71 (2025-11-13 17:18:02+00:00): Do I need to take a picture? The camera assembly is on a vertical pole at that intersection. It's approximately 9 to 11 feet up the pole, facing south bound on 52nd Street.
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-14 00:50:53+00:00): Aah, so it's on the signal mast on the southwest corner of the intersection?
WP71 (2025-11-14 00:57:00+00:00): Pull up imagery at this pin
https://maps.app.goo.gl/yhF5z9R7fZsuPtD38
WP71 (2025-11-14 01:00:27+00:00): https://maps.app.goo.gl/moWr3UZ3HwdJSFkNA?g_st=ac
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-14 18:16:29+00:00): Unable, due to copyright issues we cannot use Google Maps imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174575732
WP71 (2025-11-15 00:00:33+00:00): Isn't this a forum for validation? What's the process, if you don't mind me asking?
WP71 (2025-11-15 00:04:17+00:00): I can find a conversion to any geoloc format you need. You don't have to use Google.
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-15 05:26:38+00:00): I happened to notice in recent changes that the node for this camera lined up with the middle of the intersection on the Esri aerial imagery, but the focus is soft enough I couldn't spot the camera even if the imagery was recent enough to include it.
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-18 16:16:56+00:00): I think I put it on the correct pole (same pole as the signals over the south side of the intersection).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174575732
WP71 (2025-11-18 16:23:31+00:00): That's the one. Is there a way to pass photos/imagery on here, for verification? Is there an open map feature I'm missing?
eggie (2025-11-12 20:26:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

Feedback.. Don't use name= to describe an object.
The tag for wast_bin is amenity=wast_basket
No need to create a relation on the map for a waste_basket.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_basket

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2025-11-12 20:34:18+00:00): I removed the object.. Please don't use relations in this matter.
Look into the wiki fro information.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2025-11-14 09:30:28+00:00): Wanneer iets tijdelijk is neergezet ivm bv verbouwing voegen we dat niet toe in OSM.

MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-14 05:36:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1450107951

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Bienson (2025-11-15 08:33:47+00:00): highway=road? Setzt StreetComplete das automatisch auf highway=road, wenn Baustelle/Sperrung als erledigt markiert wird?
SomeoneElse (2025-11-12 20:29:54+00:00): (from survey)
limes11 (2025-11-12 21:29:44+00:00): Moin, 

das ergibt so nicht so viel Sinn. Den site-Relationen fehlt der Haupt-tag.

Worum handelt es sich denn ?

VG