piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:30:52+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13452310852 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cement block factory"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 07:45:08+00:00): 🗑️🤖 Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/177671263

 If you believe this deletion was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:30:53+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/9923544030 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Felix health clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 07:45:09+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671265
(Only the affected tags were deleted; other unrelated data was left untouched)
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-05 09:38:30+00:00): Removed hgv designated tag because it was tagged based on DMAMPO map; fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177561828
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-05 09:38:53+00:00): Removed hgv designated tag because it was tagged based on DMAMPO map; fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177561828
literan (2026-01-13 19:40:01+00:00): а неизвестно как дорогу в пос. Бортники пустят? осенью я на велике еще посередине стройки проезжал...
Ltrlg (2026-01-14 07:07:24+00:00): Êtes-vous sûr(e) de l’emplacement ? Cette zone de 40 m² est petite pour un tel usage et classée au cadastre comme bâtiment léger (potentiellement sans murs).
Dijkstra_Is_A* (2026-07-14 17:43:49+00:00): Der Uhlenkolk befindet sich hier nicht. Wurde der Punkt irrtümlich erstellt?
Norbert Dichter (2026-01-13 11:12:01+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177174536
Rainero (2026-03-20 18:17:19+00:00): Revert mit changeset/180172069
(unzulässige Quelle)
pitfire (2026-01-15 06:26:40+00:00): Hallo biketeur,

was sollte mit Weg: 1466725592 als (building.part 	yes) erfasst werden? 

building.part gibt es nur innerhalb eines Gebäudeumrisses.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part
 
 VG pitfire
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:30:55+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/568604575 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Photography and cinematography studio at 204 Jericho Tpke Floral Park NY 11001"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 07:45:09+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671267
(No visible changes after review)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-03 07:31:54+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and incorrect tags from POI in changeset 183578035

https://osm.org/changeset/183578035
Langlaeufer (2026-01-14 20:12:11+00:00): Irgendjemand hat auf https://addresses.tillb.de/addresses.html?state=nds kommentiert, es gäbe keine Straße "Neue Wiese".
Das ist ja offensichtlich falsch und die 5 c wäre sonst doppelt im Wiesenweg. Allerdings macht das Nummernschema der "Neuen Wiese" auch keinen Sinn. Im Wiesenweg lässt es sich vielleicht noch durch eine nachträgliche Erweiterung um die Nummer über 6 erklären.
Nadjita (2026-01-14 20:35:13+00:00): Ich bin morgen wieder dort und gucke noch mal, was wo ausgeschildert ist. Schwierig, wenn der Straßenname nicht auf den Häusern steht…
Langlaeufer (2026-01-14 21:08:52+00:00): Ich vermute mal, das wissen nicht mal die Hausbesitzer.
Nadjita (2026-01-15 10:17:50+00:00): So ist es. War heute dort und die Bewohner der Hausnummer 13 sagen, sie bekommen Post an „Wiesenweg“, weil der Briefträger Neue Wiese nicht auf dem Schirm hat (ist einfach nicht ausgeschildert), gemeldet sind sie aber bei „Neue Wiese“. Ich hab das einfach mal so wie im ALKIS übernommen, ist halt eigentlich chaotisch hoch 3
Marek-M (2026-01-13 11:29:54+00:00): Żródło:
https://www.facebook.com/OruniaGornaGdanskPoludnie/posts/pfbid02iivMFPHWQ777YnMd1JYj169hD5A1rZ1yuSKZTphui1XBeBUUuyhQu28yFtBETfUcl
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:30:59+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13452381421 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Gotham Foot care office in New York"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 07:45:10+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671268
(No visible changes after review)
eggie (2026-01-13 11:54:30+00:00): Dag rick   Hier heb ik de Heemtuinrouterelatie hersteld .
MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:31:02+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13452367826 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Math tutoring center in South Arlington"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-25 07:50:21+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted
fischosm (2026-01-15 07:14:36+00:00): Moin, die Filiale der Hamburger Volksbank ist doch gerade in die Geesthachter Strasse  umgezogen. Gibt es hier immer noch einen Standort?
stasiu512 (2026-01-13 11:47:49+00:00): Zakazu zawracania dla autobusów*
Jordi MF (2026-01-13 17:39:23+00:00): En el Nomenclátor Geográfico de Aragón, el río se denomina Riu d'Algars (https://icearagon.aragon.es/toponimia/t50189.htm). También aparece el término Algas procedente del Catastro, pero se trata de una mala transcipción porque se trata de una palabra aguda y no llana. Sencillamente, el Catastro tiene el nombre incorrecto y algún técnico de la admnistración debió usar esa información para rotular el río (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:R%C3%ADo_Alg%C3%A1s,_Nonaspe.jpg).

Curiosamente, el usuario hace referencia a la foto de Wikimedia, pero hace caso omiso de la denominación que allí aparece.
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:31:08+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13452416639 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Jachty motorowe na Pętli Żuławskiej Kanale Elbląskim oraz Zalewie Wiślanym"
---
Na przykład bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Jachty motorowe na Pętli Żuławskiej Kanale Elbląskim oraz Zalewie Wiślanym"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 07:50:22+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671403
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:31:12+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13452439633 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Restauracja w Radomiu"
---
Na przykład bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Restauracja w Radomiu"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
SpinOff (2026-01-18 09:04:04+00:00): Skróciłem opis, tak aby faktycznie był opisem obiektu.
jengelh (2026-01-15 11:47:04+00:00): Stop your actions! House number 2 was already assigned and you just produced a duplicate.
Mateicoti (2026-01-14 14:32:50+00:00): Corect era cum era inainte. Pana la urma acesta este un drum de acces la un viitor nod de autostrada.
rarad74 (2026-01-14 17:30:45+00:00): Nu are rosy o portiune lin si o portiune autostrada. De ce nu pui atunci toata centura ca si link? Link-uri ar trebui folosite doar la portiunile de drum care leaga doua categorii importante/majore de drum si/sau in apropierea unor noduri rutiere intre doua drumuri importante. Cum sunt de exemplu buclele de legatura de la toate nodurile de pe autostrazi ca si aici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/44.345486/26.226486
rarad74 (2026-01-14 17:31:35+00:00): Scuze pt greselile de ortografie. Trimis de pe telefon...
Mateicoti (2026-01-15 09:08:20+00:00): Da dar conform wikiului, road link se potriveste mai bine decat motorway. Pana la urma acel segment de drum are doar o banda pe sens...
silversurfer83 (2026-01-13 18:40:54+00:00): Hi :)

du kannst die grauen Punkte des Ackers zur Straße hin, wo jetzt Feuerwehr ist, mit rechtsklick und dann auf den Doppelpfeil von den anderen Fläche lösen und sie dann so verschieben, dass du Platz für die neue Fläche hast, wo jetzt feuerwehr ist. Die neue Fläche wird dann amenity=fire_station und das Gebäude wird building=fire_station

Bei Fragen immer raus damit

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177176976
redd (2026-01-16 09:38:41+00:00): Dear new user,
Thanks for your contribution. It seems that the "name" field contains a wrong character 'n".

Can you please check this again?

Yours,

Redd
mueschel (2026-01-17 17:21:49+00:00): Hi,
can anybody shop here 24/7 or do you need some kind of membership card?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9021268964
Lostmonkey (2026-01-18 08:50:45+00:00): According to a FB-post the supermarket (should possibly be 'convenience' instead?) is self-service 27/7 and service 06-22. You need to do a "login" (identification using phone or chip) to get access. Not sure if this qualifies as a  membership.
mueschel (2026-01-18 09:17:00+00:00): I don't know how good the automatic translation is, but to me it sounds like you really need to sign up and it's not just "touch and go" like, e.g. in some public transport systems. 
Maybe tagging it like this:

authentication:none:conditional = yes @ (Mo-Th 08:00-17:00; Fr,Sa 08:00-18:00; Su 08:00-13:00)

authentication:mobile_phone = yes

authentication:membership_card = yes

opening_hours = Mo-Th 08:00-17:00; Fr,Sa 08:00-18:00; Su 08:00-13:00 || 24/7 open "with login / id chip"

self_checkout:conditional = only @ 24/7; no @ (Mo-Th 08:00-17:00; Fr,Sa 08:00-18:00; Su 08:00-13:00)
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2026-01-18 12:22:15+00:00): You do not need to sign up. The FB site says that you can use MitID, which is a national ID system:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MitID

You can also buy a login device in the store, probably for locals that shop often or foreigners.
Frans S (2026-01-20 12:09:43+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Buildings ought to be mapped as 'building=yes' nothing else.
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping. 

C: Collected adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.


Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177178891
Frans S (2026-01-20 12:10:11+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Buildings ought to be mapped as 'building=yes' nothing else.
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping. 

C: Collected adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.


Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177178891
richlv (2026-05-16 16:52:54+00:00): Varbūt ir kādi foto ar apli?
Ja tajā pa vidu nav fizisku norobežojumu, varbūt var apzīmēt ar https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout .
Celotajs (2026-05-16 17:01:11+00:00): Nu tur būs kosmoss to pārpasaulīgo Eiropas miljonu uzzīmēt. Ieskatam raksts un 1 vizualizācija "no augšas" https://www.aizkraukle.lv/lv/jaunums/skriveros-parbuves-stacijas-laukumu
mueschel (2026-01-18 10:49:23+00:00): What is the source of these edits? I can't find any hint that these objects actually exist.
Comino (2026-01-13 13:44:29+00:00): Hi,

Your tags are incomplete (missing address details) and some have mistakes, like the dates and the phone number. Could you please fix and update them? Does this business owner also have a Facebook or Instagram account, like most do in Thailand, and if so, could you add it? How can I check that this business owner accepts Bitcoin as a payment method?

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
joeycast (2026-01-18 20:53:14+00:00): Hi @Comino - The data uploaded was provided by the business owner. While the submitter had the option of providing a website, they did not provide one. Interested parties may visit or contact the business if secondary confirmation is desired. I've corrected address and phone number, and changed date values from Buddhist Era (BE) calendar format to Gregorian calendar format.
Fraxi (2026-01-13 13:29:52+00:00): Това ".geoson data file" е останало от предна промяна...
Comino (2026-01-13 13:45:09+00:00): Hi,

Your tags are incomplete (missing address details) and some have mistakes, like the dates and the phone number. Could you please fix and update them? Does this business owner also have a Facebook or Instagram account, like most do in Thailand, and if so, could you add it? How can I check that this business owner accepts Bitcoin as a payment method?

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
joeycast (2026-01-18 20:53:32+00:00): Hi @Comino - The data uploaded was provided by the business owner. While the submitter had the option of providing a website, they did not provide one. Interested parties may visit or contact the business if secondary confirmation is desired. I've corrected address and phone number, and changed date values from Buddhist Era (BE) calendar format to Gregorian calendar format.
Frans S (2026-01-13 16:13:16+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping. 

B: Overlapping buildings.

C: Collected adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.


E: Buildings not squared or rounded.

F: Buildings partly hidden under trees.

G: Included the shadow of the building.

H: Included a yard of clearing.


Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
infeeeee (2026-01-14 10:54:29+00:00): Hello!

You got 3 warnings from your editor you haven't resolved. Can you fix them?

And you connected areas to roads. E.g. here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13452540892 the situation is more complex: You didn't leave room for the car lane, the 2 pedestrian areas contact there, while in reality there is a road between them and you cannot cross safely anywhere.

It's fine if micromap things but for me it seems like you just extrapolated lines to areas without surveying or thinking.

I would revert this as this can mess up routing, while doesn't add any new data.

Also Budapest got new and super high resolution images on the Mapbox layer, check them out!

Happy mapping!
lawrencebanks (2026-01-16 08:37:44+00:00): Hi! Thanks for the comments - fixed the Vigadó tér issue
Kovoschiz (2026-01-15 19:18:36+00:00): `type=site` has basically no software support, and you still left `shop=mall` on the members. It should be grouped together with Phase 3.
Kovoschiz (2026-01-15 19:19:45+00:00): And don't leave `building=` + `building:part=`
Kovoschiz (2026-01-15 19:45:08+00:00): Please don't use `type=site` + `building` , that's mixed up with `type=building` (but it still need a `building=` polygon as outline)
Please try to read how 3D Buildings are done before doing it. And start with something simpler.
Graf83 (2026-01-13 13:31:07+00:00): changed area type from forest to residential since the forest was cut down for residential expansion
LordGarySugar (2026-01-13 17:45:22+00:00): Can you please use landuse=meadow instead of landuse=farmland for meadows or pasture? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dmeadow 
For example https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dmeadow you can even see the sheep grazing on aerial imagery...
etgg (2026-01-13 20:33:29+00:00): Hi, thanks for your comment.
It’s a contentious subject I’m afraid, I follow the principle that the hierarchy of nomenclature starts with the land use type being farmed, whether that is arable or livestock based the predominant use of land in the UK is farmland. The crop or growth in that field has to come secondary to that first principle. A meadow can also mean so may various things which would be ambiguous to use it widely. In the case of sheep being visible then the crop is still grass, but the land use is farmland as it is primarily land that is farmed.
Friendly_Ghost (2026-01-13 21:25:40+00:00): There's no contention here. We use landuse=meadow for grassland that is used for livestock, hay production etc. If you want to make this explicit in OSM and specify it further, you can use the well-established meadow=* tag in addition to landuse=meadow.
finn-hound (2026-01-13 22:01:50+00:00): Exactly this. To add upon this, if there is livestock in a field it's not growing grass crop, it's land that is used as a meadow for grazing. The general consensus in these parts and indeed across OSM is to use landuse=meadow for these applications. landuse=farmland is almost exclusively used for arable type farmland.
Friendly_Ghost (2026-01-13 22:08:13+00:00): P.s. Please write informative changeset descriptions.
LordGarySugar (2026-01-13 23:40:37+00:00): Correction to my initial message: I meant to link this way as an example where sheep can be seen grazing and therefore should be tagged landuse=meadow: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1466753375
In my opinion the difference between meadow and landuse is not contentious (within the wider community). It's clearly explained on the wiki that landuse=farmland is to be used for areas that are tilled and crops planted. This differs from the wiki definition for landuse=meadow: land vegetated by grass used for growing hay or grazing animals. I don't follow what you are referring to in regards to heirarchy of nomenclature and first principles, but it seems like there's some kind of official designation of farmland that you're adhering to. Just because an area is zoned as farmland, does not mean it must be tagged as landuse=farmland, if its usage corresponds better to another tag. I don't believe it's ambiguous to classify things as meadow, in fact it's more ambiguous to classify everything as farmland. I'm sure the majority of the OSM community would agree with that, it's clearly documented. Unfortunately, individual mappers aren't allowed to apply their own personal definitions to tags, we all have to work together.