piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Kai Johnson (2023-12-05 14:56:47+00:00): Je viens de regarder de plus près la relation/6082214. Dans sa configuration actuelle, la superficie de l'atoll ne comprend que le récif et exclut les îles et le lagon. Je pense qu'il serait peut-être préférable que la relation inclue soit uniquement les îles, soit l'ensemble du récif, des îles et du lagon. Quelle serait la bonne manière de construire cette relation ?
Violaine_Do (2023-12-05 19:20:33+00:00): Pour les questions de rendu, je pense qu'une fois la manière de cartographier trouvée on pourra remonter aux différents rendus..
Violaine_Do (2023-12-05 20:40:00+00:00): Pour la relation je suis en train de me dire que l'on est peut-être parti d'une mauvaise interprétation de la définition. Un atoll peut être défini comme sa limite extérieur (tout comme une île le serait avec la limite terre mer). Ainsi on se débrouille avec moins de relation. Qu'en penses tu ? Je te laisse faire des tests sur Manuae? Si tu as des propositions vas y, a priori la communauté locale n'a rien a dire a ce sujet :)
Violaine_Do (2023-12-05 20:40:47+00:00): (pas eu de retour suite a l'annonce sur la liste de discussion il y a 15jours)
Aaron8810 (2023-11-18 05:31:43+00:00): Cuando se cambiara el mapa
gscholz (2023-11-21 06:56:49+00:00): 

Hi Santanaloba53,
your recent changesets have created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes
and building shapes which are be far too large:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-71.74433&lat=18.03692&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144153793

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-11-24 07:49:32+00:00): Hi Santanaloba53,
these errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
rickmastfan67 (2023-11-18 06:01:53+00:00): About time too!  Drove past it on Thursday and saw they had finally finished the approaches and the line painter was there ready to paint the new lines.

https://patch.com/pennsylvania/northhills/mcintyre-road-ross-fully-reopens-traffic
gscholz (2023-11-18 09:02:38+00:00): Hi Santanaloba53,
this changeset has create a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes 
and building shapes which are be far too large:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-71.74433&lat=18.03692&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144154360

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-11-20 07:21:23+00:00): Hi Santanaloba53, 
those errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
Xvtn (2023-12-13 23:25:55+00:00): Looks great! Thanks for your contributions. I added some other details including the car wash. Re: outdated info, it looks like these buildings are pretty new, but some areas are more up-to-date than others. It all depends on how active local mappers like you or me are!
Frans S (2023-12-07 10:52:04+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings not squared.
Buildings oversized
Included shadow into the mapped building
I checked more changsets issued by you, They show the same issues.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144155066
Jordi MF (2023-11-17 23:29:59+00:00): Hola Adriimg,

¿Podrías indicar la fuente de tus datos? He visto algún topónimo que el único lugar en el que lo he encontrado es en Google Maps (como, "Pinada lo Boter"), del cual no podemos extraer información.

Por otra parte, lo que tú llamas "Poblado del Río Monnegre La Culata", según la toponimia oficial se llama "Cases de la Culata" (https://visor.gva.es/visor/?extension=719105,4259765,721945,4261082&nivelZoom=16&capasids=Topografico;,Toponimia;&tcapas=1.0,1.0). Tenemos permiso de la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua.

Por favor indica la fuente de información para saber si tenemos permiso y a ver qué topónimos habría que priorizar. En principio, el oficial es el que debería prevalecer.

Si sigues mapeando sin responder a ninguna de los mensajes para corregir o justificar los cambios, podrían marcarse como vandalismo.

Saludos,
Jordi
SomeoneElse (2023-12-21 20:55:48+00:00): For info I've asked about the provenance of this data at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-data-source-falkland-islands/107317 .
aTarom (2023-11-18 08:44:38+00:00): Hola Robot8A, gracias por editar, puedes confirmarme que no se trata de un error el tag
"tiles"="grass"?
es para tenerlo en cuenta en siguiente revisiones como válido o no.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Dzw
Saludos
Robot8A (2023-11-18 10:29:01+00:00): Sí, es un error, tenía que ser surface=tiles. Gracias
RedEyedVireo (2023-11-22 18:13:20+00:00): Hi,

It looks like you have inavertently added two sections of trail as a boardwalk: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1224887969 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1224887970

If you could please correct this it would be appreciated. 
If you have any questions feel free to ask.
RedEyedVireo
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-20 12:25:21+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11359194377/history has 1=1 key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Frans S (2024-02-24 10:20:52+00:00): Thank you for mapping. Sorry for the late reaction. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144156330
jyeabella (2024-02-28 14:14:47+00:00): Hi! I'm jumping in the discussion since I used to have a hard time identifying which ones to map and how to draw a perfect rectangle for the buildings.
The links that Frans posted are really helpful, especially when starting out in OSM.
Just to add, when I am not sure with the shape of the building I am mapping or if I want to verify how big the building is supposed to be, I usually switch between imageries just to check. I also tend to look for the black shadows of buildings to see if I am accurately mapping.
Hope this could help you out and hope to see more edits from you! Regards and happy mapping!
EMULL011 (2023-11-17 22:00:26+00:00): review
philippec (2023-11-18 01:43:31+00:00): Pittem dienstencentrum AED.
Dit is een portretfoto, een foto in de omgeving is beter.
Het is toch al beter dan in Tielt.
Daar zijn er nog een vijftal fixme's.
driesverlinden (2023-11-18 07:25:15+00:00): Ik kom er nog over de vloer, dus zal een bijkomende foto voorzien dan. Bedankt voor de feedback!
philippec (2023-11-19 20:47:29+00:00): Ik heb toch gezien dat ze boven de brievenbus hangt.
Bijgevolg heb ik de juiste positie gevonden.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.995201299972&lng=3.2680907999722&z=17&pKey=1088865985316871&focus=photo&x=0.5839400894302333&y=0.47330441126698597&zoom=0.9354901578639643
dreua (2023-11-17 22:11:47+00:00): I meant Schlosstor.
Natasha_Zhovner (2023-12-22 11:13:12+00:00): Hello it seems that you removed actual road. Please take a closer look and make a revert. 
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/239064786
Yod4z (2023-12-22 19:14:07+00:00): And what the problem? It's an service way unsee on sat imagery
Jordi MF (2023-11-17 23:45:07+00:00): "Girau" és el nombre correcto según la toponimia oficial de la AVL.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144157232
VlIvYur (2024-05-19 20:16:45+00:00): Hello
Why did you removed all footpaths in the airport and around?
Supaplex030 (2023-11-18 10:44:59+00:00): Hallo aithebanana, kleine Korrektur: Diese Vorrichtung hier am Willy-Brandt-Haus ist kein Hydrant, sondern eine Löschwassereinspeisung (die Feuerwehr kann hier im Notfall kein Wasser bekommen, sondern - im Gegenteil - Wasser anschließen, um es im Notfall in höheren Stockwerken wieder zu entnehmen). Daher habe ich das hier entsprechend zu "emergency=fire_service_inlet" korrigiert (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dfire_service_inlet). Siehe auch https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steigleitung.

liebe Grüße,
Alex
Matt_ (2023-11-17 22:39:24+00:00): Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_National_Inventory_of_Dams
yelisey90 (2025-08-09 21:01:53+00:00): mostly reverted by now
eggie (2023-11-18 08:11:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
gdt (2025-07-26 10:45:58+00:00): please don't delete landuse=conservation.   That is actually a valid tag, despite the wiki wrongly claiming deprecation.
Jordi MF (2023-11-17 23:35:51+00:00): ¿La senda Guijarro es un nombre oficial? Si es un nombre usado por ciclistas de BTT, la etiqueta "name" no es la adecuada. Los nombres de sendas y pistas dirigidas a usuarios de "BTT" deben de ir en la etiqueta "name:mtb=*".
Jordi MF (2023-11-18 00:12:04+00:00): Hola adrii,

¿Podrías contestar a los comentarios antes de seguir mapeando? Si no, no podemos saber si los estás leyendo o no.

En este changeset has aadido un regugio de alta montaña (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dalpine_hut), el "Refugio Guijarro". Dudo que existe un refugio de ese tipo en este punto. Tampoco lo veo las ortofotos.

¿Estás seguro de que existe?
Jordi MF (2023-11-21 00:47:46+00:00): Por cierto, me equivoqué con la etiqueta de nombre para sendas y pistas de BTT. Es 'mtb:name=*'.
Kai Johnson (2023-11-18 01:07:40+00:00): Je pense que nos modifications sur Manuae se sont croisées. Peut-être pourrions-nous travailler ensemble sur ce récif ?
Violaine_Do (2023-11-18 02:17:11+00:00): J'ai édité hier. Tu peux regarder la relation atoll dont tu parlais sur le forum Tu me dis ce que tu en penses ? Je reprendrais la semaine prochaine, merci !!!
chupoxag (2023-11-17 23:32:43+00:00): Check this changeset for more info: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144122502
moje_konto (2023-11-18 00:20:52+00:00): Udało się dodać, więc notkę zamykam: www.openstreetmap.org/note/3861042

Tak jak tam napisałem, można było jeszcze dodać znaczniki:
level = 0 (parter)/1 (pierwsze piętro)/itd.
computer:sales = yes/no/used
computer:repair = yes/no
computer:parts = yes/no

I zabrakło: addr:city = Poznań ale ogólnie punkt jest dodany prawidłowo.
Jordi MF (2023-11-18 00:15:04+00:00): Viendo que has añadido un aparcamiento para vehículos en este punto, entiendo que los coches deberían poder llegar. Sin embargo, has mapeado las vías circundantes como vías de un circuito de ciclismo. Si el aparcamiento existe, ningún ruteador podrá trazar una ruta para que los coches puedan aparcar en este punto.

Revisa los accesos o, si no se trata de un aparcamiento habilitado, puede que lo mejor sea no mapear este aparcamiento.

Saludos,
Jordi
bxl-forever (2023-11-19 13:14:07+00:00): Bonjour,

Attention, la database comprend uniquement l'anglais, ne pas écrire les valeurs des tags dans d'autres langues, sinon impossible que les apps comprennent comment l'utiliser. Ceci est incorrect : material=bois,_métal,_pierre

→ material=wood;metal;stone

Thanks.
Filip009 (2023-11-18 18:57:22+00:00): Do toho wikimedia_commons nejde celý link, ale len názov súboru napr. "File:Xyyyzz". Už to niekto aj opravil.
Langlaeufer (2023-11-18 13:06:59+00:00): Hallo DiesterWander,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44488556
access=private über die Kreuzung hinaus? Wie ist der Weg beschildert? (Betreten verboten?)

Grüße
Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144159383
bxl-forever (2023-11-19 13:08:56+00:00): Bonjour,

Nous avons corrigé.
Pour un SUL : ne pas dessiner de voie séparée.  Simplement ajouter le tag "oneway:bicycle=no" sur la rue.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35579503
eggie (2023-11-18 07:19:36+00:00): Dag Donteyb,
Het is natuurlijk prachtig ingetekend. De rotonde staat nog wel op slot met access=no?
Klopt dat.

Nu hebben we hier het volgende probleem. 
Er zijn nu 1 rcn route en 3 rwn routes stuk.
Je hebt nog aan te leggen fietspaden verwijderd. Die hadden beter als construction behouden kunnen worden. Daarover liepen de routerelaties. 
Ook zie ik dat OV routes stuk zijn.
Met editor iD kun je overigens geen routerelaties bewerken. Dan gaan ze sowieso stuk. 
Je edits.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144160012

Onze fiets-en wandelroute expert twijfelde om een revert uit te voeren, maar aan de andere kant  je hebt hier ook veel werk aan gehad.

Wat nu?

Ik kijk even of het is op te lossen zonder je werk teniet te doen.

... en hoe zit het met de access=no op de rotonde? Die routeerrt nu niet. Graag reactie, 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-11-18 08:03:07+00:00): Laatst bruikbare satfoto
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=18-11-2022&loc=51.10542%2C5.857687%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-09-04&acqid=20230904_103425_PNEO-03_1_1&sensor=Pleiades-NEO
eggie (2023-11-18 12:38:30+00:00): Best lastig zo'n rotonde. 
Er is door ons wat aangepast zodat de routerelaties geen foutmeldingen meer geven.
Rijstroken zonder fysieke afscheiding  niet apart intekenen.
Dat kun je oplossen met lanes=... en voorsoorteerstoken op te nemen in de hoofdrijbaan .
Zal zo nog even kijken naar de afslagbeperking, want die geeft ook een foutmelding. Denk dat die ook overbodig is door de eenrichting.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-11-18 18:20:10+00:00): area:highway=yes is volgens mij geen valide tag.. Kijk je nog even
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway#Differentiation_area:highway_vs._area=yes_on_a_highway
user_15629788 (2023-11-18 21:39:10+00:00): Heren, ik ga mij vanaf nu nergens meer mee bemoeien. Dit ingewikkelde wereldje met al zijn verschillende editors en methoden is overduidelijk niet voor mij weggelegd, en mij verdiepen in deze compleet nieuwe materie zal mij té tijdrovend zijn is niet evenredig aan mijn interesse in dit onderwerp. Ik laat de beslissing aan jullie, fixen of terugdraaien en zal mijn account stoppen/verwijderen na plaatsen van dit bericht. Succes!
InsertUser (2023-11-18 14:12:09+00:00): What have you changed here? The changeset comment doesn't explain anything.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144160071
mapboy63 (2024-02-18 11:53:47+00:00): You've made quite a lot of mistakes here. The addr:city, i.e. the postal town for Cheadle Hulme is Cheadle, not Stockport as you've tagged. Please fix/revert this.
zorque (2024-02-18 17:57:10+00:00): You are right, thanks for highlighting this. I followed the majority of what was previously tagged. Give me a few days until I'm back at my laptop and I will fix this.
mapboy63 (2024-02-18 18:23:35+00:00): Thanks, much appreciated.
zorque (2024-02-21 07:30:51+00:00): Hi mapboy63,
I've just moved the elements in question to city:Cheadle. 
My remote approach had flaws, so I stopped these modifications a while ago. However, we have a large number of inconsistencies in addresses all over the UK. I'm working on an export to highlight and present them on talk:gb. But it may take a while until I'm ready.
Kind regards
mapboy63 (2024-02-21 10:35:52+00:00): That's great, thank you zorque. Glad the flaws have been recognised and appreciate the effort you're putting in here to rectify the inconsistencies.
nmvi_1 (2023-11-18 02:55:51+00:00): 音響付き信号でのメモの残し方（テンプレート）：
音響装置の音は「ピヨピヨ」と鳴る。（現地確認/2023.11.18/nmvi）
Metzor (2023-11-18 09:37:07+00:00): Hi GeoRizzard,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) 

Your upload contains changes in Japan and Adak Island.

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
WoodWoseWulf (2023-11-18 07:25:47+00:00): Hi Stormy-Skies-Ahead,

Rather than mapping benches as parks, the iD editor will allow you to tag benches if you search "bench" in the editor.

Rather than using the name tag to describe things, it's better practice to just tag them correctly.

Feel free to reach out if you need help.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-11-18 12:42:20+00:00): Hi! Please keep the POIs (shops, amenities) as near as possible to their main entrance, because otherwise, when we analyse accessibility for some of these POIs, they could snap to a backside road instead of the main door, which could make data analysis incorrect. Thanks!
Warin61 (2023-12-03 22:31:19+00:00): This has removed the route number and other details .... reverted.
Natasha_Zhovner (2023-12-21 08:58:44+00:00): Hello it seems that you removed actual road. Please take a closer look and make a revert.
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/900803984
snake21 (2023-12-21 16:53:11+00:00): Thanks...I just fixed it!
bdentremont (2023-11-18 04:40:28+00:00): Description should read "add new neighborhood streets" sourcing in correct.
arjunaraoc (2024-01-07 15:38:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
Issue resolved by your subsequent edit.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144162707
arjunaraoc (2024-01-03 10:20:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145832513 .
name tag values have to be specific.

Happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144162762
arjunaraoc (2024-01-07 15:34:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144162896
Tapet (2023-12-22 12:24:51+00:00): Wurde die Fußgängerbrücke über die Dorstener Straße schon wieder neu gebaut nach dem Abriss im letzten Jahr (https://www.waz.de/staedte/bochum/bochum-bruecke-wird-zurueckgebaut-dorstener-strasse-gesperrt-id235997359.html)? Auf den Luftbildern vom 6. Juni 2023 ist sie nicht zu sehen.
M!Cado (2023-12-22 12:59:38+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich war der Meinung aktuelleres Bildmateral zu verwenden. Gerade noch mal auf das North Rhine-Westphalia iDOP color Bildmaterial geschaut und festgestellt sie fehlt noch. Habe die Brücke mit demolished getagged.
arjunaraoc (2024-01-03 10:17:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Better to start with Places, and point of interest. Areas with trees are better captured as landuse than a single tree. i have reverted your edit vide https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145832341
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144162958
arjunaraoc (2024-01-02 16:16:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144163004
arjunaraoc (2024-01-02 16:12:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Your changes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361006755/history were suspect and were reverted vide https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145804899#map=19/13.00947/74.79579

Happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144163011
arjunaraoc (2024-01-02 14:41:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
Nice to see that you have resolved the issues yourself.

Happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144163063
arjunaraoc (2024-01-07 15:34:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my improvements: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145995995
and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145995882
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144163076
arjunaraoc (2024-01-02 14:34:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

the tag details for housenumber, street are suspicious for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1224938008 . If you do not have proper info delete these tags.

Happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144163101
arjunaraoc (2024-01-02 14:34:55+00:00): Please keep your updates to small areas to facilitate  review.
arjunaraoc (2024-01-07 11:08:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my improvements: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145986019
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144163102
arjunaraoc (2024-01-07 11:05:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Please upload nearby changes as a separate changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144163104
marczoutendijk (2024-04-23 18:37:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16711854
natural=47 is not a recognised value, but what did you mean?


Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
SvM (2024-04-24 10:49:11+00:00): Its mistake. I Fixed
marczoutendijk (2024-04-24 11:01:17+00:00): Thanks!