piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisReview (2025-03-20 19:09:52+00:00): #HighwayChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

In this changeset, some types of highway are being added or modified by you. 

Could we know the sources that you used? Thank you.

More information about the changeset: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163863560
NeisReview (2025-03-20 19:19:47+00:00): #NoTags

Hi, welcome to OSM.

I've reviewed your latest map edits and it seems that this changeset you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
NeisRevert (2025-03-28 20:38:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164226052 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove testdata
M!dgard (2025-03-28 23:52:49+00:00): Website gecorrigeerd naar https://www.beachclubblankenberge.be/
astotes (2025-03-27 15:13:36+00:00): This is a real trail accessible to the public. I have personally used this trail. I know from on the ground knowledge this trail is not as well maintained as nearby trails due to lack of use. It is not well known or popular, but it is there.
tekim (2025-03-27 15:24:41+00:00): Super strange that there is no Strava heat even though all of the nearby trails do have heat.  Ok, so the trail exists, but without heat, or it being visible in imagery we can't be sure this location is accurate.  We can't rely on the data from your agency as it has been shown to have many errors.  The fixme tag should remain.
astotes (2025-03-28 13:48:12+00:00): I understand you have a lack of trust in our data, but we assure you we will not be adding trails that do not exist as that goes against our entire mission. We have been made aware of these errors and as discussed previously to a great extent, much of these data are older tracks that need updating and we will not be using data that is not accurate and that we have not confirmed with multiple sources; on the ground knowledge being one of them. As mentioned in the forum as well, local knowledge is a core principle of OSM and should be used where Strava is lacking. 
There needs to be trust in those who are physically using and maintaining these trails, especially as local knowledge is a key source for OSM.

Our data has in fact proven to be reliable as we told you we physically built and tracked the Pawmaste trail and sure enough, as snow melts and people start using trails more, the Strava heat is showing up right on our track. There are sections of our data where we were not the ones to track and are outdated as we have mentioned and will take care when making edits to areas we have not been physically to check.

In this case, I have been to the trail and know from first hand experience it is not well maintained or easily identifiable. I would suggest instead of a fixme tag that the note= tag would be suitable as it can be mentioned this trail is hard to see and not well maintained but is accessible.
George Sears (2025-03-29 18:54:37+00:00): So I checked this location today, the fountain is not working and it's currently being used to fix a little Christmas tree in place
mlbiche (2025-03-29 21:16:48+00:00): Thus you prefer to add it again and tag is as abandoned? Or we leave it removed?
George Sears (2025-03-30 03:18:01+00:00): Well technically it is still there, so I'd say it's correct to keep it and tag it accordingly
George Sears (2025-03-30 03:18:38+00:00): Abandoned, disused whatever it was
mlbiche (2025-03-30 09:47:23+00:00): Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164279687. Thank you for checking onsite. Happy mapping !
George Sears (2025-03-30 10:30:44+00:00): Happy mapping to you!
NeisBot (2025-03-20 13:45:34+00:00): Hi NguyenChuong, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 88% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 9 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163863892
NeisReview (2025-03-20 19:20:35+00:00): #NoTags

Hi, welcome to OSM.

I've reviewed your latest map edits and it seems that this changeset you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
NeisRevert (2025-03-28 20:39:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164226080 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove testdata
George Sears (2025-03-21 10:14:02+00:00): Buongiorno ho notato che hai rimosso una fontana nei pressi del castello di Barletta, una fontana a Molfetta e una fontana in questo changeset.
Quella di Molfetta non la conosco, quella di Barletta ci sono passato un paio di settimane fa e questa a Canosa l'ho utilizzata un paio di mesi fa. Però mi sembra che tu le abbia rimosse completamente... 
Questa a Canosa si presenta come un lavabo quindi capisco se tu non l'abbia riconosciuta come tale (è comunque una fontana d'acqua potabile); quella di Barletta sembrerebbe una fontana decorativa a primo sguardo ma è potabile anch'essa (non capisco perché rimuovere completamente il POI in ogni caso); mentre quella di Molfetta, ripeto non la conosco però solitamente le fontane vengono semplicemente chiuse e lasciate lì e considerando i casi delle altre due fontane mi chiedo se tu abbia sbagliato ad eliminarle invece di taggarla semplicemente disused. Perciò ti chiedo cortesemente di riconsiderare i changeset
mlbiche (2025-03-21 13:44:35+00:00): Hello, thank you for your comment ! As I am not speaking fluently italian, I prefer answering in english, sorry for that. I have been travelling by bike in the area during mid-january. In such conditions, drinking water was an important preoccupation for me. I have met a lot of unfunctional drinking water through South Italy and Sardinia so it's hard to exactly remember each place but I'll try to do my best :
* In Molfetta, the place in front of the cathedral where was placed the drinking water POI seemed to have been recently renovated as there were still some road works there. The place mostly empty and as the POI was placed in the middle of it, I am pretty sure there was nothing anymore.
* For Barletta, I don't remember the fountain you mention but I found it on Street View. But as you said, it looks more like a decorative fountain so that's why I struggled to find it. I have restaurated the POI, but, for me, it makes more sense to use `amenity=fountain, drinking_water=yes` as stated in the wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfountain. See changeset : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163906910
* For Canosa, I remember the water tap, and it wasn't working. As I mentionned it in the note I left the day I past there, the handle was broken so it was impossible to get water from it. If you do prefer, I have restaurated the POI and indicated it is not working anymore with `disused:amenity=drinking_water` as stated in the wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddrinking_water. See changeset : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163906735
Tell me if it's ok for you ?
George Sears (2025-03-21 13:53:53+00:00): Hi, sorry for the comment in Italian. Seems good, thanks!
As for the Molfetta fountain I meant the one here in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163863816
If you've noticed that it's not working you should just tag it as disused, I also suggest to add/update the check_date field in these cases.
The one in front of the cathedral doesn't exist anymore indeed, I can confirm
mlbiche (2025-03-21 14:16:14+00:00): Ok, I remember this one as well on a parking. We came here because the one in front of the cathedral wasn't there. If I remember properly, we weren't able to find it at all, so we finally filled in at the fountain at the corner between streets Via San Carlo and Via Madonna dei Martiri. Maybe it could be confirmed by someone else? I can readd the POI and reopen the note I left there.
George Sears (2025-03-21 14:48:27+00:00): I can take care of it, I will pay attention next time I pass by there
NeisReview (2025-03-20 19:12:05+00:00): #HighwayChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

In this changeset and in your latest, some types of highway are being added or modified by you. 

Could we know the sources that you used? Thank you.

More information about the changeset: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163864211
Patchi (2025-04-04 19:17:07+00:00): Bonjour planet-ski,

Comme déjà indiqué dans le groupe de modifications 164317127 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164317127) l'ajout de zones résidentielles nommées pour indiquer le nom d'une station de ski est un détournement manifeste du tag landuse=residential (voir la page wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential). Rajouter de nouvelles zones résidentielles au même endroit que des zones résidentielles déjà existantes n’est pas non plus une bonne pratique. Je vous invite une fois de plus à venir en discuter sur le forum OSM France (https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/detournement-du-tag-landuse-residential-comme-station-de-ski/32838/7) avant de faire de plus amples modifications de ce genre, ceci afin de clarifier votre besoin et évaluer les solutions possibles à votre besoin avec les contributeurs de la communauté.

Si vous êtes affiliés au site https://www.ski-planet.com, je vous invite également à lire en détails les droits d'auteurs et licence pour l'utilisation de la carte OpenStreetMap osm.org/copyright car les plans affichés sur le site https://www.ski-planet.com ne respectent pas les conditions indiquées puisqu'il n'y a aucune indication visible de type "© OpenStreetMap contributors" sur les cartes disponibles sur ce site. Vous devez également préciser clairement que les données sont disponibles sous la licence ODbL. Vous pouvez mentionner ceci avec un lien hypertexte vers https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright.

Merci d’avance,

Patchi
Patchi (2025-04-04 19:17:10+00:00): Bonjour planet-ski,

Comme déjà indiqué dans le groupe de modifications 164317127 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164317127) l'ajout de zones résidentielles nommées pour indiquer le nom d'une station de ski est un détournement manifeste du tag landuse=residential (voir la page wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential). Rajouter de nouvelles zones résidentielles au même endroit que des zones résidentielles déjà existantes n’est pas non plus une bonne pratique. Je vous invite une fois de plus à venir en discuter sur le forum OSM France (https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/detournement-du-tag-landuse-residential-comme-station-de-ski/32838/7) avant de faire de plus amples modifications de ce genre, ceci afin de clarifier votre besoin et évaluer les solutions possibles à votre besoin avec les contributeurs de la communauté.

Si vous êtes affiliés au site https://www.ski-planet.com, je vous invite également à lire en détails les droits d'auteurs et licence pour l'utilisation de la carte OpenStreetMap osm.org/copyright car les plans affichés sur le site https://www.ski-planet.com ne respectent pas les conditions indiquées puisqu'il n'y a aucune indication visible de type "© OpenStreetMap contributors" sur les cartes disponibles sur ce site. Vous devez également préciser clairement que les données sont disponibles sous la licence ODbL. Vous pouvez mentionner ceci avec un lien hypertexte vers https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright.

Merci d’avance,

Patchi
NeisReview (2025-04-01 05:56:55+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164322582
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 00:29:05+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164656559
Baloo Uriza (2025-03-20 16:37:27+00:00): Landuse boundaries shouldn't be attached to highway centerlines, but instead be congruent with the edge of the landuse.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163865169
shipler (2025-04-01 15:45:47+00:00): У тебя отсутствует комментарий к большому количеству правок. В этом пакеты ты удалил актуальные объекты на Широкой речки
Jordi MF (2025-03-20 14:41:17+00:00): Hola,

Como ya se explicó en el changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160314814, este cambio es incorrecto por lo que se revetirán a su estado anterior. Estas vías no son auténticas autovías/autopistas.
meskobalazs (2025-08-07 13:45:20+00:00): Szia! Az ilyen információk inkább térképjegyzetbe vagy note=* kulcsba valók, semmiképp nem a névbe.
tandr88 (2025-08-07 14:20:10+00:00): Szia! Köszönöm a javítást.
an821620 (2025-04-09 13:21:16+00:00): what was the source for paths between ROD near FormPlast and MWiK Bydgoszcz ? I was here in the end of February and it was hard to go through.
xzu (2025-04-09 17:31:32+00:00): Well, yeah, hard (as of March 20th). Regarding source, as you can see in this changeset, `source=survey` and imagery_used=.gpx data file` (my own track when I went there). I've also mapped barriers with geolocated photos.

Most of the path I've tagged with `trail_visibility=bad` and one part is even `sac_scale=alpine_hiking` as you have to even climb almost vertical wall - the path are there though (mostly). And yeah, plenty of `barrier=log` throughout.
NeisReview (2025-04-01 05:54:59+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164321931
Yog Sot (2025-03-20 20:22:47+00:00): ale zauwazyles, ze najbardziej aktualne fotki pokazuja, że ten tor zrównali i jak ktos tam znów jeździ, to pewno jeszcze w innym układzie? :)
b-jazz (2025-03-21 05:26:31+00:00): Re: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1369677169 ...

Hello golf course mapper. The lines that define Fairways and Greens should never intersect or partially overlap each other and we noticed that they are overlapping in one or more of the fairway/green pairs in this changeset. If there is no obvious fringe around the green, the fairway should butt up against the green and every node between them should be *shared*. If there is a fringe around the green that is similar to the fairway, the fairway should extend around the green and the two objects should be merged together into a multipolygon (See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon for how to create them with your map editor).  Please read the wiki for visual examples and instructions on how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions, please reply here and I'll gladly help clarify things. Thanks!
aceman444 (2025-08-01 08:25:41+00:00): Aky je zdroj tohto nazvu? Vyriesili ste tym https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4180327 ?
s777n (2025-03-24 21:39:07+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы зачем-то повесили имя сервис центра на здание. Удалил вашу правку добавил нормально. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12697496459
NeisBot (2025-03-20 14:54:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-03-28 19:50:43+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164224014
george1201 (2025-03-21 11:28:25+00:00): Hallo ***juggernaut***,
du hast Draht Jäger mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12684810441 neu angelegt. Es gibt aber schon den Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10940737262. Diesen sollte man behalten, deinen neuen wieder löschen. Gerne kann man den bisherigen Knoten an eine passendere Stelle verschieben. Die Beschreibung mit metal_construction ist wahrscheinlich auch passender als metal_works, was im Wiki ja auch nicht vorkommt.
eggie (2025-03-20 17:04:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-25 04:24:47+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12684889766/history has shop = vending_machine that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=vending_machine ? Is it a vending machine? Or is it shop selling vending machines?
MapSpot (2025-03-25 13:06:55+00:00): Hey Mat,

It's the latter. This is a facility that sells Coca-Cola vending machines. I can add a note about this if there's no clearer way to tag this.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-25 18:23:30+00:00): company=vending_machine ?

or at least shop=vending_machine with note if anyone can walk in to buy vending machines?

(sadly shop=vending_machine is also used for individual vending machines instead of amenity=vending_machine)
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-20 15:00:49+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1369681881

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisReview (2025-03-20 19:20:53+00:00): #NoTags

Hi, welcome to OSM.

I've reviewed your latest map edits and it seems that this changeset you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
NeisRevert (2025-03-21 20:58:01+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163881805
DaanLT (2025-03-21 06:15:19+00:00): Labas,

pastebėjimas dėl pastatų mapinimo ir pozicijos. Pvz.: "UAB Šilutės durpės" pastatas - nereikėjo jo judinti nes buvo geroje pozicijoje. Pastato vieta mapinama pagal jo pamatus o ne stogą, šiuo atveju matosi kad aero nuotrauko daryta iš šono ir matomas pastato šonas.
DodoGTA (2025-03-25 20:24:24+00:00): Ar galima kažkaip sulyginti pastato vietą su pamatais jei ortofoto yra nukrypusi?
DaanLT (2025-03-26 07:44:31+00:00): Nėra ten ką lyginti - yra kaip yra. Tiesiog reikia turėti galvoje, kad žymime pagal pastato pamatus (žemę) jei orto yra kreiva (iš šono). Apvedame konturus pagal stogą ir tada pastumiam link pamatų.
eggie (2025-03-20 16:40:24+00:00): Dag Joris,

Maak altijd een verbinding met kruisende wegen. Het routeert anders niet.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=163868637
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-20 16:41:30+00:00): verbindingsnodes toegevoegd
Dodko (2025-08-25 07:49:55+00:00): V otváracích hodinách bol preklep, používaj pomôcku https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
vladosaro (2025-08-26 07:05:29+00:00): dakujem za upzornenie a opravu
DiogoBaptista98 (2026-01-14 09:18:13+00:00): O OpenStreetMap destina-se principalmente a mapear elementos verificáveis no terreno. Infraestruturas de transporte devem corresponder a obras existentes ou em construção, ou, em casos excepcionais, a infraestrutura planeada com um elevado grau de definição. Isso inclui apenas projectos com traçado oficial publicado, estudos técnicos concluídos e Avaliação de Impacte Ambiental aprovada. Propostas genéricas, intenções políticas ou ideias sem traçado oficial definido e sem aprovação ambiental não devem ser mapeadas, uma vez que o OSM não serve como catálogo de ideias ou cenários hipotéticos. Elementos propostos que não são visíveis no terreno só devem ser mapeados em situações excepcionais e após discussão com a comunidade OSM relevante, caso contrário poderão ser removidos por falta de verificabilidade.
NeisReview (2025-04-01 05:54:55+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164321931
Udarian (2025-03-21 00:51:36+00:00): next time please check if the feature you are adding already exists as this was already mapped.
Udarian (2025-03-21 00:49:53+00:00): next time you add land use please add it as an area.
bxl-forever (2025-03-21 09:54:53+00:00): Beste,
U hebt hier geen *tags* verwijderd… maar wel twee *adressen* verwijderd.
Met als gevolg dat nummers 7 en 11 zijn nu helemaal weg en kunnen niet meer gevonden worden.
Waarom hebt U dit gedaan?  Bestaat dit gebouw niet meer?
Allprint1740 (2025-03-21 12:04:14+00:00): Ik ben nieuw hier en wou een kleine test uitvoeren door een tag toe te voegen op de kaart en heb deze terug verwijderd. Maar ik wist niet dat ik de nummers mee had weggedaan. Kunnen de nr 7 en 11 terug toegevoegd worden a.u.b ?
bxl-forever (2025-03-22 00:32:42+00:00): De adressen zijn hersteld.
NeisReview (2025-03-20 19:03:07+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
rlestevez (2025-12-12 15:00:34+00:00): Source:  https://carto.arba.gov.ar/cartoArba/
Udarian (2025-03-21 00:44:41+00:00): next time you add land use please add it as an area.
Udarian (2025-03-21 00:33:36+00:00): next time you add land use please add it as an area.
user_5359 (2025-03-21 19:24:44+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/3320667200. What is the mean of the tag The Database of British and Irish Hills (DoBIH) = 14371 ?
Udarian (2025-03-21 00:43:39+00:00): next time you add land use please add it as an area.
NeisBot (2025-03-20 17:29:12+00:00): Hi mildmagic, and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear or difficult to understand.

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment
mueschel (2025-03-23 09:22:47+00:00): Please stop spamming the OSM database while testing your software. There is a dedicated development API for this purpose.
tiankii (2025-03-30 00:20:42+00:00): Ok. Understood.
jmarchon (2025-04-18 02:59:53+00:00): Hello! Looks to me like relation 18868946 broke here. I've fixed it.
b-jazz (2025-04-18 05:00:59+00:00): Hey there jmarchon, please let me know exactly what you think was broken about the relation. I'm going to put it back to the state I think is valid. If you could leave it that way and point out the problems, we can discuss it. Curious to see your reasoning. (Also, come join us for dinner Monday and we can talk about it in person. :)
jmarchon (2025-04-18 13:57:59+00:00): Carto wasn't rendering it before. It is now-I think what might have happened is when you split the way, the inner role for the relation was only transferred to one of the resulting ways. JOSM showed me a "unclosed MP" error. You're right, I should have let you know before fixing it. Sorry about that.
b-jazz (2025-04-23 17:18:47+00:00): It's entirely possible that what I did the second time around was slightly different. That would explain why rendering works for you now. I think this has something to do with a way that is shared between two relations, but I only completely loaded one of the relations, but not the other. That's my best guess at this point. I'll pay more attention to that in the future. thanks for pointing it out.
NeisReview (2025-04-01 05:54:51+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164321931