piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-09 19:51:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1341324267
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1341324269

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Patchi (2024-12-10 16:28:52+00:00): Bonjour Jessy73,

Je ne suis pas tout à fait d'accord avec ton déplacement du poteau indicateur. Celui-ci est clairement plus proche de la piste que du chemin comme je l'avais indiqué. D'ailleurs ce poteau indicateur n'indique aucunes destinations allant sur ce chemin. Voir mon relevé terrain de septembre 2024 et lien sur ce même poteau indicateur :
https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/#background=streets&focus=pic&map=17/44.560528/6.351085&pic=ed077e21-cc1e-4d2a-ab67-e5650d8f009a&speed=250&xyz=114.00/0.00/16

Bonne continuation,

Patchi.
Patchi (2024-12-10 16:57:14+00:00): Je ne suis pas passé devant le poteau "Sagne Brune" donc difficile de savoir ce qu'il y a dessus, mais si ce poteau indique clairement "Les Bras" comme destination la relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18392720 a du sens mais sinon elle n'en a pas, car du point de vue du poteau "Les Bras" (voir lien panoramax au-dessus) il n'y aucune destination vers le sud et cet autre poteau sans nom https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/#background=streets&focus=pic&pic=d502b586-111a-4898-9b11-e9c3ebbfd553
Patchi (2024-12-11 20:36:28+00:00): Bonsoir Jessy,

Merci pour ta réponse !

Pour ce qui est des erreurs avec les panneaux dans le coin, je suis à 200% avec toi. Il y a un tas d’incohérences. Je connais d’autres endroits / régions (notamment dans le Vaucluse pas trop loin des Hautes-Alpes) où la logique est plus simple à comprendre (sur chaque lame indication du nom du prochain panneau et en général de la direction principale/finale) et où c'est beaucoup plus cohérent. Et ces panneaux sans nom c’est déroutant !

Ici rien de tout ça, les noms ne correspondent pas toujours et j’avoue que oui la direction de la lame C du panneau Les Bras est peut-être fausse / la lame mal posée et indique dans la mauvaise direction (il aurait été plus claire de mettre la direction Le Sarret / Sagne Brune sur une des lames nous sommes bien d’accord). 
Les PR et GR passent parfois par des endroits différents alors que ça n’a que peu de sens. LE GR/GRP au niveau du lac de St-Apollinaire est correctement indiqué dans OSM, le PR lui suit le chemin que se situe juste au-dessus du lac (d’après le balisage sur place – j’ai les photos mais je ne les ai pas mises dans Panoramax), chemin qui est un peu plus facile à monter. Même chose un peu plus haut, le GR/GRP passe par le Plate Longue, le PR va directement par la gauche vers Joubelle. 
Le poteau Sagne Brune devrait être en effet Le Sarret si on suit les noms indiqués sur les poteaux. 
Pour le poteau Joubelle, il y a une incohérence entre la 2ème et 3ème lame, la montée par la Cabane de Joubelle n’est pas un GR/GRP mais un PR. Par contre, pour aller à Réallon il s’agit bien du GR/GRP donc les encadrement PR/GR/GRP sont inversés sur la 2ème et 3ème lame mais pas les directions.
Je ne suis pas un pros de réseaux de nœuds (network:type=node_network). Je vais donc continuer de mettre les panneaux que j’ai pris en photo, j’en ai encore un certain nombre à transférer.

Bonne continuation et merci pour cette discussion constructive !

Patchi.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-09 19:51:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3907530638
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/607110855

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1341381793

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
infeeeee (2024-12-10 11:11:37+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Itt az egyik pontra raktad a címkéket a kontúr helyett:
https://osm.org/way/1341382434

A pont: https://osm.org/node/12407925608

Itt meg az egyik pontot gondolom véletlenül elhúztad kicsit: https://osm.org/way/1077476132

Javítod ezeket?

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
felipeeugenio (2024-12-10 12:15:26+00:00): Mapero insiste en importar nombres de fuentes de las que ya se le indicó que no pueden ser usadas. Además cambia nombre de rutas troncales del país son consulta a la comunidad.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160105253
wilczywilk (2024-12-10 10:34:11+00:00): Czy na pewno jest konieczność podpisywania terenu po salonie kwiatkowski w ten sposób? Obecnie jest to po prostu teren budowy bloków mieszkalnych.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-09 20:41:09+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1211933428
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1341390124

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
aceman444 (2025-04-20 06:24:28+00:00): Zdravim, ma zmysel aby boli tieto geo-utvary Kyslinky a Polana oznacene ako mountain_range ? Polana este mozno ano, kedze zahrna hreben (krater) zvonku a teda pohorie. Ale Kyslinky ak su len vnutornou kalderou krateru tak to mi nepripada ako pohorie. (samotny okraj kratera oznacim este samostatne).
itineris (2025-01-25 16:39:06+00:00): Szia!

Kérlek, ha rajzolsz, előtte igazítsd rá az általad preferált légifelvételt a FÖMIhez! És akkor nem lesz minden elcsúszva.

Köszönöm:
Ákos
NathanBnm (2024-12-09 21:05:17+00:00): Hello Enzo tu as repris la faute dans le nom de l'arrêt. C'est "Accueil" pas "Acceuil" ;)
Nzau (2024-12-09 21:11:09+00:00): Oups, c'est corrigé ^^
felipeeugenio (2024-12-09 22:24:57+00:00): Hola. Gracias por las ediciones.
por favor cuando algo deje de existir o deje de estar donde está, borrar todo menos la dirección. La dirección sigue existiendo.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160107212
karr4s (2024-12-10 09:38:33+00:00): Question de béotien : il ne devrait pas être indiqué "lanes=2" pour la rue du Général Leclerc qui a été fusionnée suite à la note ?
Nzau (2024-12-10 09:41:04+00:00): Bien vu !
J'ai fait la modif trop vite
Nzau (2024-12-10 09:42:31+00:00): Je viens de faire a maj ^^
Nzau (2024-12-09 21:10:00+00:00): + suppression banc
Myazyk (2025-04-05 21:43:48+00:00): The Polonynian Beskids are marked very large on the map. This needs to be corrected.
*Martin* (2025-04-06 06:33:17+00:00): Please fix it if you know the exact shape or send me OSM compatible source. Thank you,
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-09 22:00:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12408217661
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12408217662

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_18023081 (2025-03-09 00:30:58+00:00): Care to explain that... polygon?
https://www.osm.org/way/739246239
Kuatsystems (2025-03-09 00:59:48+00:00): oh my goodness, yes i was working on the common areas of that apartment complex and i wasn't able to finish and i forgot and must have uploaded it.  when i have a moment i will fix it.  thanks for catching it.
Kuatsystems (2025-03-11 17:36:22+00:00): i adjusted it so it is a normal shaped area, once again thanks for catching that
Piskvor (2024-12-10 10:13:56+00:00): Zdravím,

Ano, takhle to jde taky, díky.

V zásadě je spousta možností, jak mapovat. Dva základní směry jsou "co nejpřesněji, více detailů dává plastičtější popis" a "co nejjednodušeji, příliš detailů utopí popis v chaosu."

Dokonale se neshodnou ani méně vyhrocené názory, a tak se stav mapy průběžně mění: jednou k více cestám, jednou k jednodušším liniím. (Zrovna tady na Kříženeckého náměstí je to vidět výtečně, ač samotné značení se měnilo jen několikrát). Tak se stává, že někdo "moji" úpravu předělá, i když s ní nebylo nic špatně - to je taky v pořádku, mapa jako celek se tím posouvá do stále přesnějšího stavu (nebo měla by:)). Třeba v historii téhle cesty mám několik úprav, řadu let od sebe - a vždycky je někdo jiný upraví dál https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22914366

Konkrétně tady: ten pruh je reálně vyznačen, a průjezd "ostře doprava ke Slavínského, a pak ostře doleva k bráně" je v terénu nevídaný, za mě je to určitě vhodné doplnění.

Jinak jedno z úsloví OSM je "mapujte s odvahou!" - není třeba se extra strachovat o malé úpravy: počítá se s tím, že chyby nadělá dříve nebo později každý a dají se snadno napravit :) 

Mapování zdar,
Piškvor
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-22 07:27:03+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12408192952/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-17 08:18:46+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12408251786/history has shop = hydraulics that was added in this edit
shop=hydraulics ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
bmarand (2024-12-11 10:30:29+00:00): Une habitante m'a confirmé qu'ils l'appelaient comme ça , mais bon la commune n'a pas encore validé sa Base d'Adresses locale. A suivre.
upc92 (2024-12-11 07:30:43+00:00): Hi. How does it go?
😡 🏠 It is a village.
maraf24 (2026-03-25 09:57:08+00:00): Nie jest to i nie był to deptak.
TheSwavu (2024-12-10 02:52:02+00:00): Hi,

You appear to have put the operator in under opening_hours.

I have fixed this one.
ilias_ (2025-01-04 05:03:50+00:00): A simple google search would show you that it is in fact not called Autoroute Tiznit Guelmim. You changed the name of 48 ways to the wrong name.
ilias_ (2025-01-05 04:20:41+00:00): Reverted - Please discuss with the community before making such huge edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161009025
ilias_ (2025-01-05 04:20:57+00:00): Reverted - Please discuss with the community before making such huge edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161009031
nevw (2024-12-10 07:15:42+00:00): Hi, you appear to have drawn a primary highway over top of a trunk highway.
A duplication like this is seen as unexpected by me. What are you trying to achieve?
nevw (2024-12-10 12:54:45+00:00): I have reverted this changeset.
Please tell what you were trying to do with this edit and we may be able to assist.
habi (2025-09-17 07:14:58+00:00): Ich habe die Änderungen an Kreisverkehr wieder rückgängig gemacht, damit https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4965083 gelöst werden kann

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172048125
Justin1234 (2024-12-09 23:36:10+00:00): Go map didn’t save the new change set name I put in and kept the old one
Glassman (2024-12-10 16:37:08+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160110796
Glassman (2024-12-10 16:37:17+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160110923
Glassman (2024-12-10 16:40:17+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

These look more like parcels that houses and we don't add parcel areas in OSM because they are not verifiable by an onsite visit. When adding houses, the outline should follow the roof line. 

I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160110951
DanielAgos (2024-12-19 12:15:29+00:00): Be careful when combining ways and roads, some bus routes now have gaps because of it
kcpels (2024-12-19 12:18:22+00:00): That usually doesn't happen because I never edit the way relations for bus routes, I'm just adding roads and road names. Not sure what I did this time that caused the error, I apologize.
DanielAgos (2024-12-19 12:32:10+00:00): It's seems that you've applied the name you found by survey and whatever method you're using to make that change, it's combining two ways. Since some bus routes will only use one of the segments, that one segment will either be deleted or will have the nodes of both segments. Either way, if the bus route is not changed it will create a gap since the relation can't find the way or finds it but the end node isn't shared with the next way.

I see you've used iD for this changeset, how are you applying the names? If you select both ways and do "combine" it will result in this error, if you select both ways and just change the name to both simultaneously, this error will not happen
kcpels (2024-12-19 13:18:50+00:00): Sorry I'm not sure I understand, I will try to explain what I do. I survey by doing mapping runs on foot, sometimes taking pictures but mostly from memory which is why I cross-reference with SIG resources from the conçelhos, even though these are often out of date (hence why I use ground truth as priority). I do my updates in the OSM editor. Sometimes I do combine roads, but when only one is part of i.e., a bus route it comes up as an error: "These features can't be merged because they belong to conflicting relations." In which case I do not (and indeed cannot) combine. So I'm not sure how this happened. Can you provide example of a way relation I changed that caused an error so I can try to figure out what I did? Thanks for your time, I just want to avoid doing it again in the future.
DanielAgos (2024-12-19 13:47:34+00:00): Hm, then I'm also clueless how it might be happening. The ways in question is w1052848283 and w1341422886. In the first case, buses will go from "Rua Principal" to "Rua do Chafariz Velho" (some buses will come from one part of "Rua Principal" and others from the other part). On the second one. Buses should go from "Estrada das Ameiras" to "Rua do Chafariz Velho" via Largo do Rio Covão.

P.S.: I've been testing a bit and I think I've found the issue, OSM iD checks seem to be very basic and just check if both ways are in all the relations. In these bus routes, the relation goes from "Rua Principal" to "Rua do Chafariz Velho" but it also goes from "Rua do Chafariz Velho" to "Rua Principal" (other direction) Since both ways of "Rua Principal" is in the relation, it figures it's ok to merge the ways. JOSM on the other hand will give a warning even in such cases.

It's not worth to fix these in particular since i'm preparing a changeset that will fix it together with other bus routes. Regarding OSM iD, there's not much to do as it doesn't warn in these situations and the bus routes don't show up that well. 

In any case, appreciate your time for this discussion and for the added street names.
kcpels (2024-12-19 14:47:31+00:00): OK that all makes sense now. I guess I'm relieved it shouldn't happen very commonly, and I haven't received this feedback until now despite many changesets over the past few years. Regardless I will still be careful about combining roads in areas with many bus routes, or at least in this part of Loures/Mafra. Together we make the maps more useful :)
wordbird (2024-12-17 16:45:10+00:00): there is now "temporary" small traffic circle at the intersection of Forest Ave / James St East that was constructed in Aug 2024 as part of a 1 year pilot project. - satellite imagery is outdated but I surveyed the location in Nov 2024
mueschel (2024-12-13 09:17:58+00:00): Hi,
you wrote
"amenity=kick-scooter_parking refusé par signalement Osmose".

That is a documented tag that is in use hundreds of times. The tagging was correct and the error must be on the side of Osmose.
Minh Nguyen (2024-12-10 07:49:57+00:00): The source was https://web.archive.org/web/20241117171033/https://www.caltrain.com/location/stanford-stadium as well as https://www.caltrain.com/news/caltrain-will-provide-big-game-service-cal-vs-stanford-saturday for the fact that northbound trains stop at the southbound platform.
AnnaCatarina (2026-01-15 11:13:01+00:00): Hello, unluckily, You did not name it and/or giving a source for this project. Which new rail line does this section belong to? Thanks for Your info. Regards, Anna Catarina
xem0861 (2024-12-14 05:57:14+00:00): Motorola does not make ALPRs they are made by Flock Saftey
aerxx (2024-12-14 06:09:10+00:00): https://www.motorolasolutions.com/en_us/video-security-access-control/license-plate-recognition-camera-systems/l5f-fixed-lpr-camera-story.html
xem0861 (2024-12-14 06:12:54+00:00): City of DeKalb has a contract with flock not moto
aerxx (2024-12-14 06:41:22+00:00): https://www.cityofdekalb.com/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_10112021-2066

Looks like Flock has the contract the the readers are Genetec.
mariotomo (2024-12-10 06:49:18+00:00): hi. thanks for going on adding information in the area. 
about buildings… I generally tend not to join them reusing nodes: I've observed that there's always a gap between the roofs of adjacent buildings in urban areas like this. 
also, I'm afraid that we should really be mapping the footprint of the *building*, not of the *roof*. that's a whole challenge for our area! my approach is to just slightly underestimate the building.
Peter Brodersen (2024-12-10 01:06:52+00:00): Winthersmindevej, ikke Winthersvej ...
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:06:13+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165094911
DavidKarlas (2024-12-10 16:05:21+00:00): Was deletion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/417316 intential?
ZeLonewolf (2024-12-10 16:29:15+00:00): Oof, looks like that got boogered up, thanks for catching it
ZeLonewolf (2024-12-11 03:11:57+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160151297
DavidKarlas (2024-12-11 04:24:09+00:00): Thank you, https://nightwatch.openstreetmap.si/AdminsState helps catching this kind of stuff :P
Violaine_Do (2024-12-11 21:14:56+00:00): Iaorana et maeva dans OSM! Pour tes prochaines contributions, il faudrait que tu gardes en tête que le tag name ne doit pas servir à décrire un élément. Tu peux prendre connaissance des autres bonnes pratiques ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:French_Polynesia/Bonnes_Pratiques Bonne continuation!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160112495
pootriarch (2024-12-10 01:53:58+00:00): these aren't true crossings; they're an artifact of having tracks in traffic lanes
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:17:38+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659535
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-10 02:04:36+00:00): 159947203 
159947093 
159946742 
159946384 
159946305 
159946252 
159945167 
159916138 
159915955 
159915856 
159915828 
159915397 
159915372 
159915316 
159915236 
159914769 
159914124 
159907820 
159907799 
159907767 
159907747 
159906281 
159906267 
159906200 
159905964 
159868167 
159868373 
159868666 
159869061 
159869106 
159869790 
159871147 
159871518 
159873183 
159875164 
159875656 
159876081 
159877580 
159877804 
159877908 
159881374 
159881496 
159881732 
159885200 
159885658 
159885833
rhtb0 (2024-12-10 03:38:12+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:%EB%B3%B4%EC%95%88%EA%B5%AC%EC%97%AD

오픈스트리트맵 한국에서는 군사 시설이 노출되지 않는 타일 서버를 공개하고 있습니다.(https://tiles.osm.kr/#18/37.57500/126.97700)
rhtb0 (2024-12-10 03:41:33+00:00): 원칙적으로 공원으로 바꾸는 행위는 반달로 다른 나라를 보시면 군사시설과 중요시설들 위치가 다 나오고 있습니다.

한국만큼 안보 문제를 중요시하거나 오히려 한국과 비교할 수 없을 정도로 실제로 정규군끼리의 교전이나 테러가 매일같이 일어나고 있는 나라들인 대만, 이스라엘, 튀르키예도 구글 지도 내비게이션과 위성 지도는 문제없이 서비스되고 있습니다.
GuyFrom2007 (2024-12-10 12:38:29+00:00): Hallo nochmal. Ist das hier jetzt L3334 oder gibt es hier tatsächlich keine?

Grüße
309_308_307 (2024-12-10 13:42:31+00:00): Hallo, der Frage würde ich mich anschließen, vor allem aber habe ich selber nach einer Quelle für die Abstufung der B 7 gesucht und keine gefunden, also muss ich davon ausgehen, dass es die B 7 immer noch gibt und dass diese jetzt eben parallel zur A 44 verläuft. Weißt du mehr?
Vonter (2024-12-10 05:52:14+00:00): Hello, thank you for the contribution! As this playground is within a residential "gated community", would it be more appropriate to tag it as `access=private`, rather than `access=yes` like it is currently tagged?
johanemilsson (2024-12-11 18:17:26+00:00): Good catch. I'll update.
Nick Karasev (2025-02-21 16:26:32+00:00): Please undo the change that made all roads in Hemlock Farms community private. While this is somewhat correct (this is a gated community), making the roads private effectively turns them invisible for route planning software that relies on OSM such as Suunto and Komoot. The roads are very much accessible for walkers/runners/bikers from the outside, and are most certainly usable by any resident of the community or their guests.
ElliottPlack (2025-02-22 03:33:24+00:00): Hi Nick, thanks for the comments. However, the gates here precisely meet the OpenStreetMap definition of a private road. Please have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate

I visited the community myself and had to show identification and be 'buzzed in'. "Access is only with permission on an individual basis" (in the wiki).

This sounds like a data/routing problem for Suunto and Komoot to deal with in their platform.  This meets the standard of what OSM would classify as a private road. I suggest that you reach out to the developers of those applications to provide a checkbox to allow routing on private roads. As you can see in this example router on the OSM website, there is no technical issue with routing on private routes.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=41.34018%2C-75.02718%3B41.32346%2C-75.05735#map=14/41.32874/-75.04177
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].