piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mariotomo (2025-01-27 06:36:09+00:00): hola y bienvenido a OSM.
de qué se trata, el proyecto "#reconociendo_mi_pueblo"?
y qué son estos números secuenciales empezando de 1? me das la impresión que nada más indiquen en cuál orden los has añadido a la base de datos.
acuérdate de "cuadrar" los edificios, está la tecla Q para eso.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-27 01:50:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/789830768

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse (2025-02-05 13:59:51+00:00): Hello,
There's an issue with https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5174294 - the JOSM validator and OSM Inspector https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-6.59579&lat=31.53086&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways think that the role of Way 195111844 and Way 195111845 should be Inner here rather than Outer.  I've no idea if it's related to these changes - just something I spotted by looking at OSM Inspector in the area for that problem.
Best Regards,
Andy
alain2003 (2025-02-06 13:03:45+00:00): Hi SomeoneElse

Thanks for reporting this,
Indeed the roles are not right.
I looked into it and fixed the errors.

Best regeards
NeisBot (2025-01-27 02:26:37+00:00): Hi drkrazor55, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 82% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 2 natural(s)
- 2 waterway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=161801671
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-01 14:17:54+00:00): No response. Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162012535
Pasguy13 (2025-01-29 00:16:03+00:00): Hi man when you make edits across a large area can you upload them individually?  As it is then hard to keep track of edits in someone's local area. For example, you have made one edit in Sydney and one in Japan.
Zaunhänger (2025-01-29 16:28:15+00:00): Hi, das CAIA-Gebäude ist nur noch eine Linie und kein Gebäude mehr
michael60634 (2025-01-27 04:08:56+00:00): Thanks for adding the roundabout!
citrula (2025-01-28 01:09:19+00:00): The operator name should not be in parentheses - it should just be
operator=Frisco Police Department
instead.
joost schouppe (2025-03-18 12:57:27+00:00): Bij https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4466193355 was wayside shrine wel echt op zijn plaats. Ik heb het terug toegevoegd
TrickyFoxy (2025-02-01 10:18:42+00:00): 👋 В правом меню есть кнопка Слои. Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее
b-jazz (2025-02-28 16:41:41+00:00): Not cool. Don't do this again.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 04:23:47+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164574260
S-zation (2025-10-25 22:00:12+00:00): Hello! Does this Flock camera on Meriden Road in Wolcott still exist? I've checked mapillary.com streetview imagery from March 7, 2025 and did not see anything in front of the Hertz. Thank you!
gscholz (2025-02-08 08:47:49+00:00): Hi Karo-Kingdom01,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=31.68519&lat=3.80449&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=161803898

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
kmpoppe (2025-01-27 05:16:45+00:00): Revert of additions from changesets 121935434, 122323920, 122332133, 122857622, 122876352, 122876574, 123107764, 123138869, 123138949, 123139220, 123390097, 124643904
Mashin (2025-01-27 22:17:47+00:00): Hey! I think all looks great and I don't see any issues. Really a nice job!

If it helps you, you can switch to a better resolution aerial imagery. When Editing, press "B" and  select "CT ECO Orthoimagery (2019)".

Cheers
mini-me (2025-01-27 17:20:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287418098
Почему вы считаете, что тут нет проезда?
mavl (2025-03-07 15:05:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:09:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
Kovoschiz (2025-01-27 08:32:53+00:00): Please be careful when dragging. The corner has been deleted here.
Kovoschiz (2025-01-27 08:36:12+00:00): When there's no regular ferry service, don't use `=ferry_terminal`
L Yeung (2025-02-03 07:15:09+00:00): Hello, 
What I have used so far are all `=berth` and/or `=small_craft_facility` under seamark keys. 
Not sure where I used ferry_terminal ? 
Many thanks
DD1GJ (2025-01-27 13:25:30+00:00): Auf einem Mapillary-Foto aus dem Jahr 2023 ist an der Gerhardstaße/Ecke Düsseldorfer Straße ein Schild "Verbot für Kraftfahrzeuge - Anliger Frei" zu sehen. Dies wurde bei OSM abgebildet. Wurde dieses Schild entfernt? Welche Navigationsgeräte verursachen da "Probleme"?
DD1GJ (2025-01-28 07:09:22+00:00): Alle Änderungen rückgängig gemacht.  OSM beschreibt die Realität. Wenn Rettungsdienste da Probleme habe, dann verwenden sie das falsche (Billig-)Navi.
FrechFux (2025-01-29 06:56:21+00:00): Seit geraumer Zeit wird der Abschnitt der Schützenstr. Europaring Gerhardstr. durch google maps gemieden. 

Eingabe Route Schützenstr. 6 zur Schützenstr. 24 Wegbeschreibung  führte über Hans-Böcklerstr.-Düsseldorferstr.-Dürerring- Europaring- Schützenstr 24 
Ähnliche kuriosen Navigations vorschläge bekommt auch auch bei anderen Navigationsherstellern die auf OSM zugreifen... Ich finde aber keinen Fehler in der OSM. Mit der Bitte um Hilfe
DD1GJ (2025-01-29 10:37:21+00:00): Das nachvollziehbare Routing-Beispiel von Google ist wirklich sehr seltsam. Allerdings verwendet Google eigene Daten und kein OSM.

Apple zeigt für die Auto-Navigation den direkten Weg an, ebenso die Standard-OSM-Router Graphhopper und OSMR 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=51.293718%2C6.850257%3B51.292891%2C6.850633#map=18/51.292714/6.850134

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=51.293718%2C6.850257%3B51.292891%2C6.850633#map=19/51.293329/6.850666

Auf dem Smartphone zeigt OsmAnd ebenfalls die direkte Strecke an.

Wer sind die "anderen Navigationshersteller, die auf OSM zugreifen" ? Das Problem liegt bei denen und keinesfalls an den OSM-Daten. Um Dir helfen zu können, müsstest Du da Klartext reden.
Frank Peng (2025-09-22 02:14:19+00:00): Hello iismitch55, I noticed that you merged a section of Sycamore Street Northeast tagged with "lanes=4" (Way 1149741764) next to North Franklin Street and Spradlin Farm Drive with another Sycamore Street Northeast way tagged with "lanes=2" (Way 20360745), resulting in you creating a single Sycamore Street Way from Laurel Street to North Franklin Street tagged with "lanes=2". You can clearly see in the aerial imagery that the short section of Sycamore Street Northeast next to the North Franklin Street/Sycamore Street/Spradlin Farm Drive intersection is 4 lanes (one lane going out of the intersection and 3 lanes going into the intersection). I can also tell by local knowledge of this area. You should have left the Sycamore Street Northeast way tagged with "lanes=4", "lanes:backward=1", "lanes:forward=3", and "turn:lanes:forward=left|left;through|right" (Way 1149741764) that you merged with the other Sycamore Street Northeast way (Way 20360745) on the map.

Also, I noticed that you deleted some parking areas and parking aisles in this changeset and redrew them. I don't think that you need to delete parking aisles and parking areas and then redraw them. You just have to adjust existing parking aisles and parking areas on the map by adding/deleting and moving nodes on the way or area. I looked at some of your map edits in this same area and saw that you did the same thing, deleting parking aisles and parking areas and then redrawing them on the map. I don't think you need to delete a few parking areas next to each other in the same place and then redraw the parking area to cover the entire parking area (if that's true with parking spaces designated for different uses, purposes, or groups of users, such as faculty/staff parking, visitor parking, parking for different types of vehicles, parking spaces for different types of parking permits, etc.). You can just leave the parking areas on the map and adjust them to align with those seen in aerial imagery. You can also use different tags for different types of parking, such as "access=public", "access=private", "access=customers", "access=permissive", or "access=permit", and to specify who is allowed to park there, use the "private=" tag. Link for values to use for "private=": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:private

I don't think you need to merge a few parking aisle ways connected to each other on the map and merge them into one. I think it's best to just leave them as it is and adjust them if necessary.
Frank Peng (2025-11-04 15:55:23+00:00): Just to follow up, you can read this OSM Wiki article about keeping the history: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history, so this is brought to your attention to keep in mind for the future.
When things change in the real world, make sure to be bold and edit the map to reflect the current situation. OSM stores the editing history of an element, so it's worth taking a few steps to preserve the history. Per the wiki, it states:
"When things change in the real world, be bold, and edit the map to reflect the current situation. But be aware that OpenStreetMap can store the editing history of an element. It can be worth taking a few extra steps to help preserve this history."

Instead of deleting elements such as roads, buildings, or landuse and redrawing them, it's better to update the geometry of the existing objects, which retains their editing history. You don't need to delete existing roads or parking areas on the map and redraw them. Just update their geometry. Per the wiki, it states:
"Instead of deleting elements such as buildings or landuse and redrawing them anew, it is generally better to update the geometry of the existing objects, retaining their editing history. Similarly, make sure to preserve the identity of an element even when its tags become different" (but don't overdo it).
Frank Peng (2025-11-14 05:35:32+00:00): The Sycamore Street Northeast way tagged with "lanes=4" that you merged with the other way of the same name in this changeset has been restored in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174623996. For future reference, see these OSM Wiki articles on lanes and turn lanes tagging:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn#Indicated_turns_by_lane
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn
eggie (2025-01-27 07:35:44+00:00): Hi  Christina..
Welcome to OSM. In case there is een maxspeed from 15km/h the classification of the road must be highway=living_street.
I changed the Tamboerstraat.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2025-01-27 07:43:57+00:00): I think the are more living_streets here.
https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=51.677904279&lng=5.806993246&z=18
eggie (2025-01-27 07:51:24+00:00): I changed some streets into living_street with maxspeed 15km/h according the traffic_sign map above.
Gr eggie
Christina Karchynskaya (2025-01-29 07:59:22+00:00): Hi, eggie! Thank you for your feedback and for correcting the type of the roads. I will take that into account in the future. Best regards, Christina
ion_chi (2025-08-22 21:01:31+00:00): Fulton Market is the name on street signs for this section, which you can see in Streetside imagery. It's also used on the official Chicago GIS maps: https://gisapps.chicago.gov/mapchicago
marinapatsevich (2025-08-28 13:18:15+00:00): Hi, ion_chi! 
Thank you for noticing this error and fixing it. We will be more careful in the future to avoid such errors.

Have a nice day!
ion_chi (2025-08-28 15:16:48+00:00): No problem. Happy mapping!
JulesGabrielVerne (2026-05-11 06:50:24+00:00): na jakiej podstawie obszar https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1271158722 oznaczyłas jako teren budowy? To są zwykłe zarośla i nic tam się nie dzieje. A jest maj 2026 a ty to oznaczyłaś ponad rok temu
cyganka (2026-05-12 11:13:12+00:00): Teren (pod zabudowę wielorodzinną), ogrodzony, a na ogrodzeniu tablica informacyjna. Uzbrojenie podziemne częściowo wykonane, prace zostały wstrzymane, stąd zarośla.
JulesGabrielVerne (2026-05-12 13:07:34+00:00): czyli mapuje się zarośla a nie budowę
s777n (2025-01-27 08:30:01+00:00): Здравствуйте. Добро пожоловать в OpenStreetMap

Вы нарисовали здание поверх уже нарисованного здания. Так делать не стоит. Нужно просто исправить теги. Отметить что здание уже достроено поменяв building=construction на building=retail и исправить адрес на правильный

Не нужно добавлять номера домов или типы объектов например "магазин" в имена. Тег name предназначен для собственных имен. Например "Александровский дворец" или "Магнит"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F

Когда вы рисуете новые здания пожалуйста двигайте спутниковые снимки. У них может быть достаточно большое смещение и здания будут нарисованы где-то в стороне.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%98%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B0%D1%8D%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2

В каких-то местах смещение оказывается минимальным и двигать не обязательно. Но это зависит от региона и выбранного слоя спутниковых карт

Если здание с прямыми углами пожалуйста не забывайте нажать Q чтобы выпрямить его.

Спасибо.
s777n (2025-01-27 08:30:24+00:00): Исправлено.
ChromeLotus (2025-02-19 22:08:25+00:00): Hello Nazmul Patwary Nayeem, I noticed there were many modifications made to the road network in Cumilla Adarsha Sadar Upazila that I wanted to ask you about.

The oneway tag was applied to major roads, such as Comilla–Brahmanbaria Highway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161806447, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162582176), while imagery shows vehicles traveling in the both directions. I also noticed not only some bridge and tunnels were missing layer tags, but I cannot verify that the bridge is operational from aerial imagery (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1354369790, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1357699854). If the bridge is under construction, then it would be appropriate to change the highway tag to construction (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction#How_to_map).

There are areas where link classification is applied to highways that do not match the OSM definition of a link (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1355909431).

Looking at the highway network holistically the network seems to be overly classified. Such as this secondary that is used to access a rural area  (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1354154921), tertiary feature accessing what appears to be a residential area (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/547589398), and primary roads that would be better classified as secondary (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/548822066).

I am curious about the sources you are using to support these modifications. Do you have any thoughts on reclassifying roads in cases where the current classification does not best fit the OSM definition?

-ChromeLotus
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-27 07:40:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413783765

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-27 07:40:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413785029
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1354417072

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2025-02-08 08:06:10+00:00): Hi Ng Josh, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 40 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Marek-M (2025-01-27 08:38:28+00:00): Cześć, co tu się zadziało, że zniknęła ulica Widokowa w dużej części oraz inne drogi dojazdowe w okolicy? Jak jest obecnie zrealizowany dojazd np. do tego budynku: https://www.osm.org/way/891024917
Wejherowski Turysta (2025-01-27 08:50:49+00:00): Tak jak dotychczas, tylko nie Widokową ( która była źle oznaczona), a drogami wewnętrznymi bez nazwy i dojazdami po prywatnych działkach. Moim zdaniem nie każde miejsce wyjeżdżone przez samochód czy ciągnik np do gospodarstwa powinno być zaznaczone w postaci dróg na mapie, a już na pewno nie można im przypisywać dowolnie nazw. Pałętała się w tym miejscu również jako niepoprawna nazwa drogi: Słoneczne Wzgórze, chociaż to nazwa rejonu w Rodzinnych Ogrodach Działkowych...
Marek-M (2025-01-27 09:15:12+00:00): Gdybyś usunął tylko nazwę z dróg, to nie poruszałbym tematu ale Ty usunąłeś drogi dojazdowe do tych nieruchomości za działkami i w tej chwili nie ma do nich żadnego dojazdu, przynajmniej na mapie OSM.

Każda droga wyjeżdżona na polu może być zaznaczone drogą na tej mapie, tylko są do tego dedykowane kategorie dróg oraz tzw. access. Minimum jakie powinno być na mapie OpenStreetMap, to dojazd podstawowy do każdej nieruchomości, nawet jeśli jest to droga błotnista. 

Twoja edycja jest niepoprawna. Jeżeli nie wprowadzisz poprawki z drogami dojazdowymi, to zostanie ona wycofana.
Szymson (2025-01-27 14:28:50+00:00): Chłop co zrobił...
s777n (2025-01-27 08:36:42+00:00): Здравствуйте. Исправил вашу правку. Заменил на офис компании Твой Старт. Если вы конечно не имеете ввиду что внутри здания есть организованная плошадка с уличными тренажерами так как это добавили вы. Тогда оставьте пожалуйста заметку и я переделаю.
hatul (2025-07-29 14:12:36+00:00): השביל חסום בלי שום מעקף?
zstadler (2025-07-29 21:20:19+00:00): אם היה, הייתי ממפה אותו
hatul (2025-07-30 08:11:01+00:00): 😔
user_5589 (2025-02-01 12:34:55+00:00): Except that those central pedestrian refuges are large enough to mean that it should be recorded as two carriageways for the distance through the Place des Ternes.

Why do you think I altered it in the first place?

Oh and the give way on node 12532433232 now makes absolutely no sense with the way you left it. You've also managed to get Avenue des Ternes crossing a pedestrian refuge without a corresponding pedestrian crossing node.
Benoît C MdP (2025-02-01 14:06:30+00:00): En dehors des refuges piétons, il n'y a effectivement aucune séparation physique entre les sens de circulation (cf avenue des champs Elysées par exemple)
Ta contribution était par ailleurs incomplète avec des sens de circulation erronés et des itinéraires de bus mal reportés. J'ai donc préféré revenir à la situation initiale. Même si tout n'est pas parfait car je n'ai pas accès à JOSM.

Bonne continuation 

Benoît
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Vinber-Pro (2025-02-11 13:40:52+00:00): Bonjour,
pour une pépinière il y a cet attribut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:landuse%3Dplant_nursery

et si c'est un lieu de vente également de plants alors https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:shop%3Dgarden_centre ?
user_21880486 (2025-01-27 08:25:57+00:00): Hi,

Some of the service roads you added are actually parking aisles. The tag for this is service=parking_aisle. You can find it in ID by searching parking aisle.

Reguards,
computerOwl
スペシャルマン (2025-01-28 14:43:51+00:00): Dear computerOwl,

Thank you for pointing this out. I was not aware of the service=parking_aisle tag. I truly appreciate your guidance and will make sure to use this tag in the future.

Best regards
specialman99
ivanbranco (2025-02-04 15:47:48+00:00): Hi meryem wakrim,

you mapped the tower thrice, two times as a node and one time as an area. Also, what's the source of the area geometry?: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1354589154
Schenkelhals0815 (2025-01-27 11:37:37+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Korrektur, jedoch der Vollständigkeit halber sei erwähnt, dass ich hier seit deiner ersten Überarbeitung nichts verändert habe.
mcliquid (2025-01-27 11:47:09+00:00): Sehr gerne. Interessant, ich habe hier folgendes Changeset vorliegen von 2025-01-26T23:56:42Z: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161799217
In diesem Changeset wurde der Gehsteig verlängert und quer über Zufahrten und Gärten gezogen (siehe die grüne Linie):
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=161799217

Der Username dieser Änderungen ist "Schenkelhals0815". Bist nicht du das?
Schenkelhals0815 (2025-01-27 11:52:28+00:00): Das ist echt witzig, weil bei mir hat es auf dem Browser komplett anders aus. Kann das am Edge-Browser liegen?
mcliquid (2025-01-27 11:55:36+00:00): Das liegt mit Sicherheit daran, dass ich deine Änderungen vor 4 Stunden rückgängig gemacht habe und es deshalb jetzt korrekt dargestellt wird.
Schenkelhals0815 (2025-01-27 12:14:31+00:00): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MbEBi2DBwt_EhGX-qIlxBDjFjJvYkzr1/view?usp=sharing

Das habe ich definitv nicht gemacht. (siehe Bild oben)
mcliquid (2025-01-27 12:18:14+00:00): Dies wurde definitiv und unbestreitbar von deinem Benutzernamen gemacht. Siehe Achavi-Link oben.
Wenn du das anscheinend nicht warst, hat jemand deinen Account übernommen. Ich würde dir dringend empfehlen dein Passwort zu ändern.