piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Tex2002ans (2025-07-02 23:51:15+00:00): Hey _jcaruso,

I see you've been adding a massive amount of Microsoft AI buildings.

If you want to add slightly better buildings in North Carolina, it looks like "Cabarrus County, NC Buildings" (and a few others) are available in Rapid instead.

1. Just click the "Rapid" button.
2. Click "Add/Manage Datasets".
3. Search for ", NC" and it should pop up.
4. Press the "Add Dataset" button.

You should be able to pick a color, and continue using it like you have been. :)

- - -

On the Microsoft buildings... a few of these are *extremely* low quality, like these 2 houses:

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1411200237/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1411200138/history

Microsoft just detected a straight square, but you can clearly see:

- House #1 looks more like "3 rectangles stuck together".
- House #2 looks like a "fat L with a rectangle porch sticking out of bottom middle".

Or this crazy one, where Microsoft was just completely wrong, where it drew "a crooked rectangle":

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1411200057/history

The County GIS stuff should hopefully be much better in many cases.

- - -

I wrote a few posts on the OSM forums about this "low-quality AI Buildings" issue:

- https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editors-adding-buildings-through-ai-tools/127720/20
- https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-keep-track-of-ai-building-outlines-corrected-tag/130714/6

Thanks,

Tex
Wynndale (2025-07-03 09:35:04+00:00): Isn’t that tagging for the renderer?
DaveF (2025-07-03 12:07:13+00:00): All tags is 'tagging for the renderer'. Otherwise it would be just black dots & lines.
The correct expression is 'tagging *incorrectly* for the renderer'

These edits improve the quality of the OSM database.
MassCartog (2025-07-01 17:32:56+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. I see your working on house outlines, heres a tip, after your done doing an outline, select it and press "g" to square the corners. Or you can right click and press the "square" button. This will help fix wonky shapes.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-01 16:21:06+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8329949296
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/346982960

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-07-01 20:45:33+00:00): Dag Hees,

De hoofdtag is leisure=playground 

Je hebt nu alleen de specificatie gemapt.

MVG
eggie
Colbertson (2025-07-01 18:52:57+00:00): Sveiki!
highway=primary tegs paredzēts lielajiem autoceļiem nevis daudzstāvu māju sētām, tur drizāk derētu highway=service vai varbūt highway=residential
Iesaku palasīt wiki un apskatīt kā apzīmēti jau esošie ceļi
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines
silversurfer83 (2025-07-01 18:10:54+00:00): Hi there :)

are you sure with the natural=mud here? Have you read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dmud?

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168361452
ManuelB701 (2025-07-02 04:08:31+00:00): Da frage ich mich, was der Grund für die Änderung ist, insbesondere dass es
a) nicht der Standard ist,
b) die gegenwertige Tags nicht berücksichtigt (was nach einen Hack hindeutet)
c) schon das zweite mal ist, dass das mit Konsti passierte
KlopanRin (2025-07-01 17:29:13+00:00): Finally finished ts
woodpeck (2025-07-01 19:33:40+00:00): Just to answer your question, your racist comments in your previous changeset were not "justified". Apparently you did not know that changesets are automatically closed after 60 minutes of inactivity. If you use such unacceptable language again, your account may be suspended.
KlopanRin (2025-07-13 19:47:31+00:00): Doesn't matter because at the end of the day I finally managed to finish what I was working on this whole time
woodpeck (2025-07-13 20:36:24+00:00): It matters insofar as all these interactions and utterances are public, and new OSM contributors might shy away from joining a project that appears to have unhinged people run wild.
bartgron (2025-07-01 18:18:48+00:00): Nazwa usunięta jako nieprawidłowa
bartgron (2025-07-01 18:01:01+00:00): Ta droga nie ma nazwy. Wycofane:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168365278
bartgron (2025-07-01 18:02:53+00:00): Wycofane:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168365341
ToniE (2025-07-01 16:37:01+00:00): Bzgl. "BayernAtlas": das gilt auch für diese Adresse.
NeisBot (2025-07-01 16:36:59+00:00): Hi Zedstrian, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Modified node positions."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #NoComment #AIgenerated
NeisBot (2025-07-01 16:37:02+00:00): Hi JacekKu, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added name and refined healthcare/amenity tags for a clinic/doctor's office, including modifying existing ways."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
bartgron (2025-07-01 18:12:08+00:00): Niepoprawna nazwa, wycofane:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168365739
mtmail (2025-07-23 12:06:33+00:00): The changeset added a couple of "addr:postcode=permit". Was that meant to go into a different tag value? Ways 1249525602, 1066204729, 1066204730, 1249525603, 43250216, 401634039
lmum (2025-08-14 01:11:40+00:00): Thanks for catching. I've removed this tag.
kpv8 (2025-07-01 20:22:28+00:00): No tylko teraz problem jest taki że nie ma już drogi nr 818 została zniesiona i przekazana powiatom.
grzegorz75jan (2025-07-01 21:09:50+00:00): Mój revert zmienia tyle, że dowolny numer drogi znika z name w którym być nie powinien. 
Jeżeli masz jakieś informacje, źródła  i jeżeli czujesz się na siłach to uaktualnij lub daj temat wraz z informacjami ludziom którzy się zajmują drogami. 

Moja wiedza w zakresie dróg jest żadna.
grzegorz75jan (2025-07-01 21:11:03+00:00): Droga została przywrócona do stanu twojej ostatniej w niej edycji.
kpv8 (2025-07-01 21:12:30+00:00): Mi chodzi to że zmieniłeś w słupkach z oznaczeniem drogi na ref=818, a tego oznaczenia już nie ma, a ja name już kasowałem tu:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162882426
grzegorz75jan (2025-07-01 21:55:09+00:00): Zaczynam powoli coś łapać. Teraz muszę wymyślić jak to zrobić, żeby się nie orobić.
grzegorz75jan (2025-07-01 22:23:44+00:00): Przywróciłem ref na słupkach. 
Dobrze, że zauważyłeś. Muszę bardziej pilnować reverta. Skupiłem się na samej drodze a nie wpadłem na to że przy wycofywaniu poleci zmiana wykonana później niż wycofywana. Może nawet w raporcie po wycofaniu było ale nie doczytałem.
Dobra lekcja na przyszłość dla mnie.
flohoff (2025-07-02 06:21:57+00:00): Moin,
du hast das hier von residential/unclassified auf tertiary hochgestuft.

tertiary entspricht normalerweise einer Kreisstraße - damit haben die auch eine Kreisstraßen Nummer - Also K22 z.b. 

Die fehlt hier noch.

Flo
user_10799485 (2025-07-02 13:30:04+00:00): Nein das ist keine Kreisstraße.
Sind bei Euch in GT der Stadtring Kattenstroth / Sundern und Nordhorn etwa eine Landesstraße? Nein, es ist eine städtische Straße, genau wie hier die Nordstraße nur ein wenig größer.
user_10799485 (2025-07-02 13:34:18+00:00): Und die sich hier südlich anschließende Leopoldstaler Straße und der aus östlicher Richtung kommende Teil der Mittelstraße sind auch keine  Kreisstraßen.
flohoff (2025-07-02 14:26:23+00:00): Der Stadtring Kattenstroth ist explizit als Umgehung und entlastung der B61 gebaut worden.

Du machst hier eine innerstädtische Straße zu einer "Kreisstraße" - dabei sieht das Verkehrswegenetz da nicht danach aus als wolle man DA verkehr Anziehen.

Was sagt der Verkehrsplan der Stadt wo der Durchgangsverkehr hin soll?
user_10799485 (2025-07-02 15:05:30+00:00): Leopoldstaler und Mittelstraße sind auch keine Kreisstraße. Außerdem ist da lang das Silberbachtal ausgeschildert. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.87530487903&lng=8.943103571712&z=17&pKey=1402327244143750&focus=photo Kreuzung Nord / Leopoldstaler / Mittelstraße. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.87299144049&lng=8.945294729755&z=17&pKey=1242665154137559&focus=photo Vonder Leopoldstaler Straße aus gesehen. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.872441710335&lng=8.9456037251542&z=17&pKey=602446655536244&focus=photo und aus der Mttelstraße gesehen https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.872808057947&lng=8.9458089493541&z=17&pKey=1623407558373170&focus=photo Die Nordstraße https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.874205934322&lng=8.9445246348725&z=17&pKey=1343550076751677&focus=photo Zum Vergleich Die Leopolstaler Straße https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.870957668961&lng=8.9464783813969&z=17&pKey=1609571289699857&focus=photo und noch die Mittelstraße https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.87303656513757&lng=8.946553292692897&z=17&pKey=722406133604756
user_10799485 (2025-07-02 15:12:53+00:00): Es war ja mal ein Südring als Entlastungsstraße von der Leopolstaler Straße zum Hessenring geplant. Aber die wurde ja leider von das darf ich hier nicht sagen verhindert. https://www.lz.de/lippe/horn_bad_meinberg/22971739_Planungen-fuer-den-Horner-Suedring-sind-begraben.html
user_10799485 (2025-07-02 15:26:19+00:00): Hier noch ein älterer Artikel ohne Bezahlschranke.https://www.lz.de/lippe/horn_bad_meinberg/20247210_Der-Traum-vom-Suedring-geht-weiter.html
user_10799485 (2025-07-03 06:00:24+00:00): Es kann sich bei einer Tertiary um eine Kreisstraße handeln, muß es aber nicht. Zitat aushttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtertiary  Kreisstraße, ehemalige Bundes- oder Landesstraße oder sehr gut ausgebaute Gemeindeverbindungsstraße, die im Regelfall mindestens vier Meter breit ist und manchmal mit, manchmal ohne Mittellinie ausgestattet ist. Sie verbindet kleinere Orte und dient dem innerregionalen Verkehr.  Dann steht da noch: innerstädtische Hauptstraßen sind in der Regel vorfahrtsberechtigt und deshalb durch entsprechende Vorfahrtsschilder gekennzeichnet. Sind in der Regel heißt aber nicht, daß das zwingend so sein muß. Und hier handelt es sich um ehemalige Landesstraße, nämlich die ehemalige L954. Die wurde irgendwann in den 1990ern mal abgestuft. Aber warum der Potthof die L828 hat verstehe ich nicht. Ist allerdings im Tim-Online und im Basemap.de auch so nummeriert.
osmviborg (2025-07-02 05:29:38+00:00): 'tunnel=culvert' bruges ifm. med vandløb, ikke veje. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel=culvert
b-holdet (2025-07-03 19:34:40+00:00): Så er det fikset for brugeren. Håber at vedkommende læser med i wiki'en
map per (2025-07-03 17:43:21+00:00): Hello Traveler_22,

Please don't use the map editing functionality of Maps.me to upload private bookmarks like "My home" to the public OpenStreetMaps map database. Please use the bookmarking functionality instead.

Thanks and best regards
map per
OddBunsen (2025-07-01 20:13:30+00:00): Hello, I am glad you are editing Open Street Map! One thing you should look into is "descriptive names" on the OSM wiki. For example, the underpass you edited should not have "Underpass" in the name section. If it were named something like "Alice's Memorial Underpass" on a sign nearby or something, that would be appropriate for the name= tag, but only if people actually call it something in that way. The tunnel=yes tag is sufficient to show that it is an underpass.
VictorIE (2026-06-10 19:28:39+00:00): Playground? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1411229160/
ramthelinefeed (2026-06-10 20:24:50+00:00): Nah, there's been change there in the past year or two - the kids swings etc are now across the round on the east side of the carpark, whilst the bit in the middle of the park (where the swings used to be) has been landscaped into some kind of 'herb garden' IIRC?
VictorIE (2026-06-10 21:47:30+00:00): Oh, fair enough. Between the photography being undated and the ambiguous looking details, I wasn't sure.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-01 17:42:07+00:00): z https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4305120
KlopanRin (2025-07-01 17:52:02+00:00): Yes, the building exists.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168364718
eggie (2025-07-01 20:25:35+00:00): Dag FPSU   , maar niet volgens BGT / Kadaster
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=177849.18&geometry.y=505020.54&zoomlevel=12.24

Daar is het toch echt de Pionier. Dat lijkt me ook logisch, want je hebt niet een stuk straat met de naam Moinel afgewisseld met Pionier en dan weer Morinel.
Wanneer je denkt dat je gelijk hebt doe dan een terugmelding via bovenstaande link.
Wat is je bron in deze? 
MVG
eggie

Wanneer
eggie (2025-07-01 20:32:05+00:00): reverted by changeset #168370736

Ik heb dit voorlopig teruggedraaid.
Heb je wellicht google als bron gebruikt?

Doe je zelf een terugmelding bij via Verbeterdekaart Kadaster als je overtuigt bent van je gelijk?
MVG
eggie
FPSUsername (2025-07-06 12:02:31+00:00): Correct, was een fout bij Here Maps (die overigens wel meerdere fouten heeft tegenwoordig).
dieterdreist (2025-07-01 22:02:40+00:00): also here, unconnected sidewalk island.
muralito (2025-07-02 00:54:59+00:00): Hi. While you change is strictly correct and mapping the legal regulatory sign that is there, in practice, in OSM it allows a router to suggest to drive SW and turn there and enter in the Y shaped service way, which is also forbidden and dangerous.
LakeThingvalla (2025-07-03 14:35:20+00:00): Hello muralito, thanks for letting me know. If you think that the road sign shouldn’t be mapped, then I am happy to defer to your edits.
muralito (2025-07-03 17:44:28+00:00): No, no, it should be mapped, is a real existing object. But it should also be analyzed in the context ot the other mapped objects. I'm not sure what the best mapping would be, but there is a need to map that you cannot  turn left like the previous version of this restriction was imposing. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4848638 . Maybe adding the restriction, maybe fixing drawing the service way, i don't know...
LakeThingvalla (2025-07-07 20:09:05+00:00): I think creating a new no_left_turn restriction, assigning the tertiary road as the via member, would achieve the intended outcome (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341551036). Another option could be to add a only_straight_on restriction from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way341551036 to    https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/78118539I. I wasn’t aware that no_left_turn’s were modeled instead along Ruta 8 trunk highway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6544446). With this knowledge, I am comfortable with whatever direction you take.
muralito (2025-07-07 21:00:53+00:00): Yes, as you saw a lot of no u turn signals where mapped as no left turn because that is what they mean, weird but is the way it is. The no_left_turn restriction solves it. The signals are confusing, the no_u_turn means that you cannot use http//www.openstreetmap.org/way/341551036 so the no left turns would model the real world. the same way is allowed to turn left NW while going NE, and crossing SE.

This is mapped as trunk because that is the defined criteria, but nowadays it is a slow avenue, a lot of pedestrians and old cars, motorbikes and bikes, a lot of traffic calming bumps, radars, traffic signals, so is better to try to avoid using it.
LemonEarlMapper (2025-07-08 15:56:07+00:00): Thanks you for your insight, muralito! Would you like me to add the no_left_turn with the tertiary segment as the via member (osm.org/way/341551036)?
muralito (2025-07-08 16:54:58+00:00): Sure, thanks for your help.
LakeThingvalla (2025-07-11 16:58:40+00:00): Hello muralito,
After careful re-consideration, I’ve restored the no_left_turn relation to your original modeling, as the revised version using the tertiary as the “via” member does not effectively restrict u-turns as intended. Apologies for not recognizing this earlier, and I appreciate your openness to discussing it.
muralito (2025-07-14 12:51:34+00:00): Yes, at least some years ago the "via" member was not supported by some data consumers, for that reason I mapped a lot of these restrictions as no_left_turn.  I would expect that was fixed nowadays but it seems that it hasn't happened yet. It's their fault, not the data, but anyway is better if we can map in a way that the data is useful for most people.
ivanbranco (2025-07-25 09:16:28+00:00): Ciao Vito,

surface=unpaved è meno specifico di surface=compacted: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:surface

C'è un motivo per questa scelta?

Grazie e buon mapping!
mcliquid (2025-07-02 11:56:10+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Alt7706 (2025-07-04 11:09:04+00:00): Hi, tell me more about conflict. What do you mean, and why are you telling me? Why I need to stick to one location, if I travel a lot and want to contribute in many countries. Is it bad? Or it is OSM politic to limit contribution, and how are you connected to these limits?
mcliquid (2025-07-04 13:06:44+00:00): Hi Alt7706, thanks for your reply and questions!

You're absolutely welcome to contribute wherever you travel — that's one of the great things about OpenStreetMap! The suggestion to keep changesets local isn't meant to limit contributions, but to help with a few practical things:

1. Easier Review and Collaboration
When a changeset covers many countries or distant regions, it's hard for other mappers or local communities to review what was changed in their area. Keeping edits geographically grouped makes it easier for others to verify and improve the map.

2. Avoiding Conflicts
A "conflict" can happen if multiple people edit the same area at the same time. It’s rare, but it becomes harder to manage if someone’s changeset spans multiple regions. Smaller, local changesets reduce the risk of overlapping or accidentally undoing others’ edits.

3. Data Clarity
When a changeset covers a wide area, it's harder to understand its purpose or intent. Reviewers might wonder: was this change about roads in Germany, a POI in Thailand, or a typo fix in Peru? Grouped, local changesets help keep edits meaningful and clear.



To be clear: you're not doing anything wrong by contributing in many countries! It's just a recommendation to save edits more frequently and keep each changeset focused on one area at a time. This makes the project smoother for everyone involved.

Happy mapping and thanks again for contributing to OSM!
dieterdreist (2025-07-01 22:02:03+00:00): Here's the same issue as in the other changeset: the imported sidewalks are not connected to anything.
Umbugbene (2025-07-03 12:47:17+00:00): Thanks for fixing these. I have a few more fairways to draw, and I'll follow this convention henceforth.
b-jazz (2025-07-03 14:16:27+00:00): Thanks. Nice to see this will be correct from the start.
NeisBot (2025-07-01 18:39:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-05 19:41:47+00:00): Thanks for your corrections.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168366956
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-02 05:32:33+00:00): Hello! Thanks for adding new amenities.

But as you can see, you drew one building within another. If both cafe and hotel are placed in the same building, you can draw them as nodes within single polygon of the building.

Or you can redo as a node only the cafe.
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-03 17:15:23+00:00): I've fixed myself
Gregory Peony (2025-07-01 19:36:49+00:00): You correctly identified buildings in imagery, but I think they should be square not round.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168366910
Tomas Straupis (2025-07-03 11:32:54+00:00): Taip negali būti. Su adresu X visada yra tik VIENAS objektas.
Alt7706 (2025-07-03 20:47:51+00:00): Maps.lt pasižiūrėk
Tomas Straupis (2025-07-03 23:03:23+00:00): maps.lt duomenų naudojimas yra vagystė, baudžiama pagal LR baudžiamąjį kodeksą.
Jei geriau pasižiūrėtum, tai ten korpusų numerių trūksta ir tada adresai skirsis.
Alt7706 (2025-07-04 10:34:33+00:00): Na na papasakok apie vagystes man daugiau. Gal dar BK straispnį konkretų nurodysi. Atrodo šiek tiek tamstai prisisapnavo apie vagystes. Juokas tik ima iš tokio "high level" admino.
Tomas Straupis (2025-07-04 10:52:33+00:00): Baudžiamojo kodekso 189 straipsnis. Adminų OSM nėra. Yra žmonės, kurie rūpinasi ir tvarko duomenis, yra kurie terliūzina ir nepadaro nieko naudingo, tik priešingai, trukdo tvarkyti duomenis. Šitie namukai nesudaro nė 0,001% Lietuvos adresų bet jų peckiojimas trukdo tvarkyti 99% adresų duomenų.
Alt7706 (2025-07-04 11:05:09+00:00): Kas tau ką trukdo tvarkyti, tvarkytojau. Ir apie kokius terliūzytojus kalbi. Iš viso biški savo mandras natas nuleisk žemyn ir mažiau susireikšminimo. Aišku ?
Alt7706 (2025-07-04 11:11:46+00:00): Prieš grąsindamasis BK straipsniais (čia iš viso LOL), patarčiau paskaityti jų dispoziciją ir tada demonstruoti savo teisines žinias.
Tomas Straupis (2025-07-04 11:15:57+00:00): Supratau supratau, profesoriau. Nebekibsiu su patarimais, gi viską pats geriau ir be bendruomenės ir be išsilavinimo žinai :-) Sėkmės.
Alt7706 (2025-07-04 11:21:07+00:00): Nelabai mačiau patarimo, tik grąsinimus BK straipsniais ir verkimą kaip kiti terlioja, o vienas tamsta viską tvarko. Komentarai ir pagalba galimi ir vertinami, tačiau adekvatūs. Siūlyčiau pasimokyti bendrauti su bendruomene.
dieterdreist (2025-07-01 22:00:11+00:00): Please do not import arbitrary data without review, I noticed this footway does not meet the quality requirements we expect from contributions: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1411242604
it is not connected to anything, and an isolated sidewalk fragment like this is just pointless.
ivanbranco (2025-07-01 22:11:44+00:00): Also, what's the meaning of #mapwithai-tm4-206? I tried searching it in the wiki but I got 0 results. The Organised Editing Guidelines say:

"Changeset comments should include the unique hashtag described on the wiki page under Organised Editing/Activities/Name of the Activity (as described in the Process section), and link to that page."