piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nati_DPD (2025-11-17 22:54:08+00:00): Dobra dzięki spróbuję w wolnej chwili ale jak będziecie mieć czas to możecie się pobawić bo po strzyzowie są tragicznej luki jeśli chodzi o Zyznow, godowa i np ulicę modrzewiowa i ogólnie strzyzow jest bardzo dziurawy.. są też w niektórych miejscach odwrotnie opisane adresy.. aj masakra jest
grzegorz75jan (2025-11-17 23:15:01+00:00): A dopiero trybię, że to osobnik płci żeńskiej.

Na swój sposób rozumiem. Nam jest łatwiej bo coś się tam już mniej czy więcej dłubiemy w OSM a komuś tak z marszu to jest ciężko się połapać i łatwo się pogubić, nabroić a wożenie paczek w niektórych obszarach szczególnie gdy to początki kariery to krzyż na drogę.
Po walce z czasem i ludźmi to o niczym innym się nie marzy jak jeszcze o doktoryzowaniu z OSM ale w przyszłości może się przydać.
grzegorz75jan (2025-11-17 23:28:51+00:00): Tymczasowe koło ratunkowe https://mapa.targeo.pl/21.7566573,49.8626393,18

Z tego co wiem to kurierzy trochę na tym operują. Choć mamy tu rozjazd z numeracją choćby 40R (twoje 40 R) a u nich 40r.
Nati_DPD (2025-11-18 08:07:29+00:00): A cyrk jest na tej trasie, na innych aż takich dziur nie miałam
grzegorz75jan (2025-11-18 19:41:05+00:00): Niestety ostatnio strona budynki nie pokazuje nowych adresów do pobrania.
Na upartego można by na piechotę dodać parę adresów w oparciu na  tych twoich błędnych ale to i tak dłubanie nie mówiąc o pozostałych wcześniej wymienionych obszarach.

Aktualnie pomagaj sobie tym targeo. W około godzinę wiele nie nadłubię jeżeli znajdę godzinę.
grzegorz75jan (2026-01-05 21:24:21+00:00): @Nati_DPD Adresy wróciły na stronę budynki https://budynki.openstreetmap.org.pl/#map=15.73/49.86721/21.776217
Można kopiować tagi i dodawać. 

Wprawdzie wrzuciłem chwilę temu parę adresów na krzyż (w sumie nic względem potrzeb) bez Simc itd. ale zawsze coś. Szkoda, że strona nie wstała przed szałem świątecznych zakupów ale na przyszłość będzie.

W sumie w OSM gość trochę ruszył sprawę https://github.com/ttomasz/prg_convert?tab=readme-ov-file i może się to przydać gdyby strona znowu miała problem. Pliki pobrałem, poczytałem ale brakło czasu na realizację.

Strona działa to jest dobrze.
Glassman (2025-11-13 18:32:52+00:00): #TIP: we don't use descriptive names in OSM. The tag is sufficient. Please remove the tag name:ur
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174589007
NeisBot (2025-11-13 06:57:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-13 06:57:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Financial planning service"
NeisReview (2025-11-18 14:06:11+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174818009
NeisBot (2025-11-13 07:06:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-13 07:06:44+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "handicrafts and souvenirs shop"
NeisReview (2025-11-18 14:05:41+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174590159
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-13 08:43:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174593131 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a poor quality undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18953
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-13 08:42:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174593131 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a poor quality undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18953
Bienson (2025-11-15 08:35:31+00:00): tracktype=grade1 widerspricht surface=fine_gravel.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-13 08:43:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174593131 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a poor quality undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18953
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-13 08:43:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174593131 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a poor quality undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18953
Higashimado (2025-11-14 14:25:22+00:00): 您好，place 节点上的 name:en 应该是不含“village”这样的通名的：
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#China
GSF1200S (2025-11-18 08:08:43+00:00): 现场路牌都是 "xxxxx Village" 哦
Higashimado (2025-11-19 15:27:52+00:00): 了解了，谢谢解答
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-13 08:43:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174593131 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a poor quality undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18953
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-13 08:43:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174593131 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a poor quality undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18953
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-13 08:42:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174593131 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a poor quality undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18953
Brandsideer (2025-11-13 08:52:37+00:00): Thank you, and my apologies. My intention wasn't to disrupt any mapping - just to amend the routes of footpaths  30 and 31 through the buildings at Brand End Farm. This is in line with the Derbyshire definitive map. The route currently shown is incorrect. I sand link to the definitive map or share a screenshot if helpful?  Thanks and best wishes, Matt
Brandsideer (2025-11-13 08:56:09+00:00): A search for "BRAND END FARM, UNNAMED ROAD FROM A53 TO BRAND TOP FARM, BRANDSIDE, BUXTON, SK17 0SF" on the Derbyshire mapping portal, and activating the layer to show PRoW might help illustrate the issue. Many thanks, Matt
BCNorwich (2025-11-13 09:15:23+00:00): Hi Matt,
I looked at the PRoW map to determine the route of FP 31 where the service road is also the PRoW. Is there still a problem with FP 30? If so, can you fix it, or can I help?

Regards Bernard.
Brandsideer (2025-11-13 10:31:52+00:00): Hi Bernard,

I think it looks good now.

Thanks so much for your help. 

Very best,

Matt
Brandsideer (2025-11-13 10:38:00+00:00): Ah, actually, it's not right on this page, it goes throutgh the farm buildings, not to the North
Brandsideer (2025-11-13 10:38:26+00:00): I'm not sure now how to edit it...apologies
Brandsideer (2025-11-13 10:40:11+00:00): If I click on edit from here, it looks ok. But on this page where I can comment...I looks wrong.
BCNorwich (2025-11-13 11:37:25+00:00): Hi, sounds like either the website has not yet updated in all zoom levels. This usually sorts itself out in a short time, a day at very most.
Or more than likely your browser cache is holding on to the older renditions. Answer, clear the browser cache. Most browsers today support the keyboard shortcut Ctrl+Shift+Del to open the clear history settings where the cache can be cleared.

Regards Bernard.
habi (2025-11-13 07:31:06+00:00): Und dabei grad noch ein paar JOSM-Validierungs-Fehler gelöst.
aceman444 (2026-05-06 09:44:37+00:00): Thanks. But if you change a building like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127495584 , then also update the source tag. It is no longer kapor2, if you changed it according to Ortofotomozaika SR.

Also please do not randomly move buildings like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127495407 by a few centimeters. Buildings with source=kapor2 (or ZBGIS) are from Slovak cadastre map and are usually correct and more precise than aerial imagery. So only touch them if you clearly see in aerial, that the building is totally wrong. Or you can cross-check with the cadastre that the building has changed. You cannot see displacement by small distances on Ortofotomozaika that is lower resolution. In this case both Ortofotomozaika and cadastre shows that that small building should now be much longer to the west. So when you wanted to touch that building, you could at least improve it in this way.
dmjab13 (2025-11-13 15:03:04+00:00): maybe don't make edits in different countries in one changeset
CharliePlett (2025-11-13 16:16:08+00:00): I'm sorry, I uploaded OsmAnd edits, and I just upload the occasionally.
evgenykatyshev (2025-11-14 08:32:50+00:00): I've reverted it because the image link isn't valid and, according to the name, it's company logo

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174637650
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-13 08:43:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174593131 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a poor quality undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18953
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-13 08:43:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174593131 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a poor quality undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18953
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-24 06:08:46+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised Editing & import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176338212
DD1GJ (2025-11-13 08:55:06+00:00): Hallo Stame, willkommen bei OSM. Der BayernAtlas wird unter CC-BY 4.0 veröffentlicht. Da leider noch keine Zusatzvereinbarung vorliegt, ist der BayernAtlas eine unzulässige Datenquelle. Ich habe daher die Hausnummern wieder entfernt,++Durch den Ort laufen, sichtbare Hausnummern aufschreiben und anschließend eintragen ist erlaubt.

https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/
stame (2025-11-13 09:28:35+00:00): Servus DD1GJ,

wie gesagt wohne ich in dem Ort und kann die Hausnummern bestätigen. Diese sind korrekt, lediglich bei einzelnen musste ich kurz nachschauen.

Der Ansatz, dass der BayernAtlas als Datengrundlage nicht zulässig ist kann ich davon abgesehen mal gar nicht nachvollziehen. Auch wenn das wohl eine grundsätzliche Entscheidung ist hier ein kleiner Exkurs: Ich Arbeite bei der Bayerischen Vermessungsverwaltung und der BayernAtlas greift auf offizielle amtliche Datenbank unserer Verwaltung zu. Es ist auch unser eigenes Produkt, also ein amtlicher Kartenviewer direkt von der Behörde. Zuverlässiger kann es gar nicht mehr werden. In jedem Fall zigmal zuverlässiger als die Behauptung "ich bin da vorbeigelaufen". Gerne kann ich darauf noch näher eingehen oder auch alles belegen was ich hier von mir gebe.

Das soll jetzt nicht persönlich gemeint sein, aber ich kann das gerade wirklich gar nicht nachvollziehen. Und nochmal für diesen konkreten Fall: ich wohne da und die Hausnummern passen wirklich! Es wäre wirklich schade wenn die Arbeit das einzutragen umsonst gewesen sein soll.

Schönen Gruß

Stane
DD1GJ (2025-11-13 10:52:34+00:00): Hallo Stane,

ich bin schon mehr als 15 Jahre in Kontakt  mit dem Bayerischen Staatsmisterium der Finanzen und der Bayerischen Vermessungsverwaltung. Herr Dr. Bauer (ist längst im Ruhestand) sagte auf Konferenzen immer, dass der Freistaat Bayern auf die Einnahmen aus dem Verkauf der Hauskoordinaten angewiesen ist, um einige Stellen in der Vermessungsverwaltung finanzieren zu können.

Da wir von dem Landesamt für Digitalisierung, Breitband und Vermessung schon einmal einen freundlichen Hinweis auf die unzulässige Übernahme von Hausnummern aus dem Bayernatlas erhalten haben, schrillen in der Qualitätssicherung alle Alarmglocken, wenn das BA-Wort in den Quellenangaben erscheint.

Es schade, dass ich wegen ein paar einzeln übernommener Hausnummern gleich alle Hausnummern zurückgesetzt habe, aber in der Teilnehmervereinbarung [1] steht: "Wir respektieren das geistige Eigentum anderer und wir müssen auf Einwände von Inhabern dieser Schutzrechte reagieren können". 

Natürlich schätzen wir die Arbeit der Bayerischen Vermessungsverwaltung. Vor Jahren habt ihr sogar in OSM die Grenzverläufe zu Vorarlberg hochpräzise korrigiert. Dies geschah allerdings anhand der freien Daten der österreichischen Kollegen, da die identischen bayerischen Daten nicht unter einer passenden freien Lizenz zur Verfügung standen ;-)

[1] https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms/DE

Viele Grüße, Joachim
stame (2025-11-15 17:39:36+00:00): Guten Abend und entschuldige die späte Antwort.

Ach, daher weht der Wind. Ja, den Dr. Bauer habe ich auch noch kennen gelernt, auch wenn ich persönlich weit weg vom Ministerium bin. Jetzt verstehe ich aber wenigstens worum es geht.

Dann gehe ich halt mal bei Gelegenheit durch das Dorf und notierte die Hausnummern, wenn ich mal die Zeit dazu finde :)

Schönen Gruß!
stame (2025-11-15 17:43:02+00:00): Ach ja, und danke für die Erläuterung! Wieder was gelernt, war mir so bisher nicht bewusst
confusedbuffalo (2025-11-13 20:57:17+00:00): Hello, it looks like you are doing a good job fixing up phone numbers!
I just want to understand if there is something wrong with my tool, as it seems that you created 5 empty changesets (this, 174591805, 174593564, 174594824, 174600104) for województwo mazowieckie before creating https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174600765 with 1111 edits in it.
If you can remember what you were doing to make that happen then please let me know
szedar (2025-11-13 21:17:31+00:00): After correcting the phone numbers, I wanted to send the entire changeset, but it wouldn't go through, and there was an error message. I don't remember exactly what it said; there was some code error related to line 1124 or a similar number. I tried to send it a few more times, but it was unsuccessful. So I decided to delete that changeset and start correcting again, and then everything went smoothly.
confusedbuffalo (2025-11-14 04:34:40+00:00): Ok, thank you. If you get the error again, it would be great if you could let me know so I can try to fix it
confusedbuffalo (2025-11-14 10:20:20+00:00): Comments from other people suggest that it happens when the element has been deleted since the report ran. I will add checks for this so that it doesn't give errors (or make edits) in such cases in future.
szedar (2025-11-14 19:35:06+00:00): Hello! Thank you for sharing the information. Great that you’ll fix the bug. Good job on creating that page for correcting phone numbers. If any errors appear, I’ll let you know.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:34:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-14 07:20:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1364130784

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:35:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-13 08:43:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174593131 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a poor quality undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18953
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-13 08:42:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174593131 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a poor quality undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18953
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-13 08:43:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174593131 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a poor quality undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18953
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-13 08:43:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174593131 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a poor quality undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18953
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-24 06:08:47+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised Editing & import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176338212
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
DD1GJ (2025-11-13 08:41:23+00:00): Revert. Der BayernAtlas ist leider keine zulässige Quelle für OSM. Diese Daten werden unter CC_BY 4.0 veröffentlicht und es gibt leider noch keine Zusatzvereinbarung zur Nutzung.

https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/
pdKURIER-LI (2025-11-13 09:48:41+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ich habe das zur Kenntnis genommen.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
Cele078 (2025-11-13 11:32:12+00:00): Hi, this one is Ciou, not Prou
Nemesuisse (2025-11-13 12:44:34+00:00): OK Thanks.
Feel free to fix my paragliding commits: I'm pulling from Syride database with a semi-automatic script and do not challenge the name provided by Syride on place I don't know. ;)
AndyB_66 (2025-11-16 15:40:02+00:00): Stosuj sie, proszę, do zasad komentowania zestawów zmian, obowiązujących w społeczności OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:38:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-13 08:43:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174593131 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a poor quality undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18953
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-13 08:43:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174593131 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a poor quality undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18953
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-13 08:43:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174593131 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a poor quality undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18953
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-13 08:42:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174593131 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a poor quality undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18953
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-13 08:42:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174593131 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a poor quality undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18953
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-13 08:42:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174593131 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a poor quality undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18953
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-13 08:43:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174593131 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a poor quality undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18953
EfreetSK (2025-11-13 09:58:37+00:00): Dobrý deň, aký zdroj ste použili? Lebo nemáte vyplnené source pre tieto zmeny. Pozerám na to "Alejské" a samého ma to zaujíma, nevedel som že sa to tak volá. Ale zároveň neviem nájsť nič o tom, pozerám staremapy.sk aj ZBGIS
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-13 08:43:14+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 173921468, 174589965, 174590016, 174590243, 174590307, 174590372, 174590402, 174590494, 174590899, 174590949, 174591045, 174591877, 174591972, 174592000, 174592007, 174592009, 174592010, 174592307, 174592312, 174592315, 174592316, 174592319, 174592321, 174592359, 174592361, 174592364, 174592367, 174592368, 174592369, 174592434, 174592488, 174592490, 174592493, 174592495, 174592499, 174592500, 174592505, 174592555, 174592556, 174592558, 174592561, 174592564, 174592565, 174592568, 174592570, 174592572, 174592575, 174592580, 174592582, 174592583, 174592586, 174592587, 174592588, 174592591, 174592592, 174592596, 174592597, 174592599, 174592602, 174592604, 174592608, 174592610, 174592612.
bxl-forever (2025-11-13 16:28:15+00:00): Hello,

Please do not change information on existing address points (UrbIS data points for addresses and buildings).

Adding small businesses is fine but please:
1) Always add them as nodes.
2) Never write any address on them.

I will now fix your various edits.
Thanks in advance.
Comino (2025-11-13 09:49:34+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
JuanjoMC (2025-11-13 12:15:23+00:00): Hi again,

in this building there is, or at least there was until a few months ago, a mortgage office. See here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.87338770000002&lng=4.32307000000003&z=19.9&pKey=1177619881071430&panos=true&x=0.7080561890019785&y=0.46817258540476525&zoom=1.7151188284318033&focus=photo&dateFrom=2025-01-01

It seems, from what I've seen on their website, that this shop, Ritons, is at the back of the building and the entry is the garage door at the front. Is that correct?

Also, can you confirm that the mortgage office is still there?

Cheers
JuanjoMC (2025-11-13 12:05:31+00:00): Hi,

Mot Passant books shop was already on the map as a node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11390091208), which we prefer.

Un reverted this changeset.

Have a nice day
JuanjoMC (2025-11-13 12:17:06+00:00): Un reverted ... -> I reverted ...
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-24 06:08:48+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised Editing & import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176338212
TheNightRider (2025-11-13 08:56:01+00:00): To clarify, read the note tag on the station, not a separate OSM note.
DD1GJ (2025-11-15 01:20:27+00:00): Revert, siehe osm.org/changeset/174667845