piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ivanbranco (2025-02-05 10:26:27+00:00): Ciao Andrea,

l'edificio é un po' storto. Presumo che nella realtá abbia degli angoli retti, in questo caso puoi selezione l'edificio e cliccare Q sulla tastiera per raddrizzarlo.

"Bifamilaire Lotto 15" é una descrizione dell'immobile o il nome ufficiale?

Vedo che hai anche aggiunto residential=bifamiliare, ma su OSM utilizziamo per convenzione l'inglese britannico, qua trovi alcuni valori: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aresidential
Forse duplex é applicabile? In caso contrario si puó anche cancellare il tag.

Comunque benvenuto su OSM e buon mapping!
somehundred (2025-03-02 10:07:16+00:00): Gandrīz mēnesi vēlāk pēc šīs izmaiņu kopas publicēšanas es, apstaigājot Andrejsalu klātienē, secināju, ka jūsu ieliktie ceļu būvdarbi nemaz vēl vispār nenotiek. Lūdzu nekartējiet būvdarbus, ja neesat klātienē apsekojis būvdarbu vietu!
micheleOSM3 (2025-02-06 08:16:30+00:00): Per favore fai attenzione alle relation quando modifichi, nello specifico hai rotto la relation "Via Postumia - Tappa 6". Buon mapping, Michele.
ivanbranco (2025-02-05 10:21:11+00:00): Ciao Alessandra, hai aggiunto tutte le componenti dell'indirizzo tranne la piú importante, il numero civico. Una dimenticanza?

Intanto benvenuta su OSM e buon mapping
Alessandra DIF (2025-02-06 08:33:33+00:00): Ciao grazie per il benvenuto. Hai fatto bene a rilevare la mancanza del numero civico, una distrazione.
archie (2025-02-04 17:03:13+00:00): Might you be a bit hasty changing from chipseal to asphalt?

The value "chipseal" (a cheaper version of asphalt, which is used on certail highways out in the countryside) is taken from the swedish national database of highways in Sweden. 
So what is your status of knowledge about chipseal/asphalt on those highways? Especially versus the NVDB database of the swedish state?
eggie (2025-02-04 17:05:42+00:00): Dag matijs   Je hebt wel een heel groot gebouw neergezet. Staat dat er echt of bedoelde je landuse =construction. Gebouwen worden periodiek geimporteerd of op verzoek versneld geïmporteerd  via het forum van OSM.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-04 17:11:49+00:00): Het gebouw heb ik omgezet naar landuse construction.
Import nieuwbouw hier aanvragen.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/3041

Groet
eggie
eggie (2025-02-04 17:12:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
matijsv (2025-02-04 17:23:18+00:00): Dag eggie, 

Ik bedoelde landuse = construction idd. 
bedankt!
jengelh (2025-03-18 11:11:38+00:00): Warum du den Neubau gelöscht und durch den Altbau in OSM ersetzt hast ergibt keinen SInn. Ich habe diesen Unsinn wieder entfernt.
archie (2025-02-04 17:06:52+00:00): Please do not change tagging on those combined foo/cycleways. Thank you.
ivanbranco (2025-02-05 10:19:17+00:00): Ciao Simone, 

benvenuto su OSM! Attenzione, avevi collegato la strada all'edificio, e si erano anche sovrapposti gli elementi. Ti era apparso un errore "Strada residenziale attraversa Edificio", é sempre bene non ignorarli e cercare di capire qual é il problema.

Grazie per la modifica e buon mapping!
SomeoneElse (2025-02-12 23:18:19+00:00): Hello,
Please help other mappers to understand what you are changing by using changeaet comments that describe what it is you're changing.
Best Regards,
Andy
Lezurex (2025-02-04 20:48:20+00:00): Hi Yannick,

Thanks for your contributions so far.

But attention: No tagging for the renderer/app/router/etc: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer This is against good practice.

If the app fails to correctly interpret OpenStreetMap data, it's the app's fault. OpenStreetMap data should never be changed solely to make it appear different in a specific app.

If you think this is wrong and the app should use the name key, contact the app's author.

Could you please revert your changes so it's correct again? This also applies to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162134243.

Happy Mapping
Lezurex
_Yannick_ (2025-02-04 22:14:50+00:00): Many thanks Lezurex for the helpful feedback! I reverted my changes. However the removal of the one defibrilator was correct as this one is no longer available. 

Apparently the data fields for defibrilators is populated incorrectly for many locations (e.g. showing a mixture of owner name & producer). This has been reported to the respective parties here by me today. 

Best regards,
Yannick
s777n (2025-02-05 09:36:45+00:00): Здравствуйте. Имя библиотеки стоит добавлять на библиотеку а не на здание. Исправлено
s777n (2025-02-05 09:39:45+00:00): Тренажерный зал это leisure=fitness_centre. Поправил.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_centre
SunnyIsland10 (2025-02-25 17:45:15+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar satellite imagery via MGP Pro 2025-01-08.
Syl (2025-02-05 09:39:17+00:00): Bonjour, le parking vélo est définitivement fermé ? Si oui ajouter "disused:amenity" ne suffit pas. Il faut aussi enlever "amenity=bicycle_parking" et tout autre attribut qui n'est plus pertinent.
Monsieur_J (2025-02-05 11:55:56+00:00): J’aurai pu répondre avec le compte de métropole, mais pour l’instant le service est seulement suspendu.
yrtimiD (2025-02-04 18:30:27+00:00): Hi and welcome!
What happened with the forest you removed?
gurglypipe (2025-02-06 09:55:52+00:00): Heya, you’ve changed the name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11288138877 quite significantly, from ‘Great Slack’ to ‘Seathwaite Fell South Top’. Are you sure this is correct? Great Slack is shown on the OS maps and should be mapped as some kind of feature in the area (even if it’s not the name of the summit). As I understand it, the names on DoBIH are not necessarily historically researched, and are often constructed by whoever listed the hill. They’re not particularly canonical.
Sforzando9500 (2025-02-06 10:14:23+00:00): Fair do's - I'll change it back. I think you make a good case
gurglypipe (2025-02-06 10:29:35+00:00): 👍
silversurfer83 (2025-02-04 20:43:33+00:00): Hi there :)

your POIs look alright. And the "fixme" is ok, too.
I edited the hospital to reflect your research. If you take a look now you can find these added to the keys:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162137001
ivanbranco (2025-02-05 10:15:03+00:00): Ciao Ivano,

hai modificato da private a permit, che significa che serve un permesso per passare. Mi sembra sbagliato e quindi ho rimosso il valore di accesso così che venga considerata come una normale strada. Grazie per aver scoperto il problema e benvenuto su OSM!
PardusTigris (2025-02-04 18:32:48+00:00): correction : "piste:type=hike" plutôt que "snowshoe"
JJIglesias (2025-02-04 20:23:00+00:00): Los elementos que existen en la vida real NO SE BORRAN del mapa, ni se omiten del mapa.

Si son privados se les coloca acceso restringido o puertas si las tuvieran pero NO se borran.

Gracias
Lucho_BO (2025-02-04 20:40:30+00:00): Hola JJIglesias, te comento que el elemento de la vida real al que haces referencia NO EXISTE, es un garaje de un taller no es una via, NI publica NI privada, valga el detalle, es un patio de un taller donde reparan autos.
Lucho_BO (2025-02-04 20:44:56+00:00): Como referencia sobre el tema de mapear patios traseros (backyars) te comparto las guidelines de la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapping_private_information

cito:
- Limit the detail of mapping private backyards. As a guideline, permanently installed private swimming pools (add access=private as appropriate) or some structures in semi-public gardens are acceptable. More detailed information is likely to be not acceptable or borderline.

- Mapping private buildings, private roads (including driveways), and private parking is completely acceptable. Add access=private as appropriate to roads, parking lots, etc. However, annoying artifacts may appear in applications like Pokémon Go with short driveways.
JJIglesias (2025-02-05 00:32:30+00:00): Slds. Me parece excelente
JJIglesias (2025-02-05 00:36:22+00:00): Me parece excelente que hagas refencia a la Wiki pero pareciera q no entendiste el significado, eso No es un Backyard, es un Driveway, es una entrada vehicular a un taller mecanico segun indicas. Pues asi precisamente esta dibujada como un Driveway, con Acceso Privado y una puerta de entrada.

En realidad en vez de preocuparte tanto por el acceso a ese local seria mucho mas Importante que pusieras el Taller, con todos sus datos y demas contactos.

El borrar data valida no contribuye mucho al mapa. Agregar DATA valida si contribuye al mapa.

Gracias
Lucho_BO (2025-02-05 01:32:48+00:00): Creo que el punto esta en la diferencia de mas data vs. mejor data. 
El marcar todos los driveways privados va aportar mas data, pero no es util para el usuario promedio de OSM que jamas tendra acceso a esos driveways. 

Dejo un ejemplo de lo que dice la wiki cuando agregas driveways privados aplicado a la app de pokemon GO que usa la data de OSM
https://www.reddit.com/r/TheSilphRoad/comments/7t6a7h/osm_update_what_it_looks_like_when_you_add/

Es mi opinión creo que partiendo de alguien que usa OSM para navegación / ruta y trecking. Pero puedo ver como puede contrastar viéndolo desde el punto de vista de querer una representación fidedigna del mapa.
JJIglesias (2025-02-05 06:49:30+00:00): Lo que diga o haga Pokemon Go ten por seguro que a los mapeadores nos Importa Absolutamente nada.

Con respecto al uso del mapa a traves de aplicaciones, yo tambien lo uso, cada dia en mi actividad profesional y todos los fines de semana en mis actividades ludicas.

Cuando empece a hacer el mapa Santa Cruz no tenia ni 100 calles dibujadas. Entiendo tu preocupacion con respecto al Driveway, pero te repito No es ni mejor ni peor data es simplemente data, y si la quitas hoy, otra persona la pondra mañana pues es un acceso y existe. 

Asi q mejor dejarla bien etiquetada, que borrarla y que al cacho la vuelvan a poner pero mal etiquetada.

Gracias
JJIglesias (2025-02-05 06:53:17+00:00): Sinceramente hay MILLONES de datos faltantes en SCZ para preocuparse por un driveway de 15 mts a lo sumo, y solo como ejemplo, hoy he corregido mas de 250 errores en la ciudad. Infelizmente No hay mapeadores en Santa Cruz de la Sierra y lo que hay en el mapa de todo el Departamento de SCZ incluyendo sus ciudades se ha puesto mayoritariamente desde Cochabamba.
Jamesthecorndogalt (2025-02-05 12:33:48+00:00): what i meant to say was i could make it better, i review their own map
AjBelnuovo (2025-02-06 11:58:20+00:00): Tem horários para os feriados?
Aceita outros meios de pagamento?
Fischkopp0815 (2025-02-05 09:26:20+00:00): Willkommen bei Openstreetmap..Einige Anmerkungen zu deinen Änderungen.

1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515625383 Ein Spitzname mag vielleicht noch als loc_name durchgehen  aber ein Palast im OSM-Sinn ist das definitiv nicht. Ich habe den Namen als loc_name gelassen und den Rest zurückgesetzt. Ich finde aber der loc_name sollte auch weg.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name

2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675628540 Ein Baugerüst an der Wand macht noch keinen Neubau.Ich habe das zurückgesetzt. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.0484611&lng=9.1148596&z=17&pKey=475274252081623&focus=photo&x=0.5118642808161623&y=0.25518485235709343&zoom=0

3.Bei der Änderung an Ernas Eck hast du die angrenzende Halle gelöscht. Ich habe sie wieder eingetragen. Die war da im Sep. 2024 noch. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.044556399999976&lng=9.12085019999995&z=19.24339938691478&focus=photo&dateFrom=2024-09-01&pKey=1252433412564865

Außerdem hast du einige Objekte versehentlich verschoben. Ich habe sie zurückgeschoben
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2025-02-05 21:02:53+00:00): Maybe it's better to use streams instead of drains? Those are natural, as I understand.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddrain
Pikse (2025-02-07 09:38:15+00:00): I don't understand your edits to bridges. You can map a bridge as an area (man_made=bridge) but when doing so you shouldn't remove bridge=yes and layer=1 from highway that crosses the bridge. Also, where road and river intersect there's normally either a bridge or a culvert, not both together, and usually there is no need adjust layer for both road and river (normally set only layer=1 for bridge, and layer=-1 for culvert).

There are also some problems with landcover, you drew a marsh that overlaps with water, and also it appears that water area for Põltsamaa river is currently broken (relation not closed).

Possibly this changeset should be reverted.

As for drains, I'd also consider using waterway=ditch for that small waterways, eventhough they are probably natural.
RSun (2025-02-07 10:41:28+00:00): Sorry for the inconvenience caused by my mistakes. I didn't change the attributes intentionally, no idea how that happened. It wasn't my intention to cause others work - so it's better to undo everything.
I entered the bridge areas because otherwise only the narrow line of the road is visible in the map, but not the entire width of the bridge. If there are also cycle paths on the sides, water can be seen between the cycle path and the road. As a water sports enthusiast, I also find the bridge area very helpful in the map, because some bridges are significantly wider than the crossing road/track, especially with railway bridges that are built for more than the currently available track.
I thought the bridge area plus the "bridge" attribute was redundant, but I now understand that this should remain an important attribute of the road.
I agree with "ditch", in nature it is often difficult to tell whether it is artificial or an actually natural but channeled watercourse.
Pikse (2025-02-07 14:21:36+00:00): Alright, thanks for reflecting on this. I think I now managed to fix your changes around waterway/highway interesections, as well as some other stuff, without reverting it altogether:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162247134
Glassman (2025-02-06 23:55:47+00:00): One website shows the site as active. See https://www.airnav.com/airport/WA75. Not sure how accurate the site is.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162138990
Gregory Peony (2025-02-05 02:07:55+00:00): Hi, several of the building footpritns you've added here actually represent barriers (like walls or fences) visible in the imagery. Beware that in this region many gardens have surrounding barriers. Use this context info and the shadows to tell them appart from buildings. ---Surrounding walls will generally cast a greater number of shadows than a building becasue they have no roof. ---Shadows in ESRI are being cast SSW. To aid your interpretation I recommend that you align and compare with BING (1.79; -1.79) in this area which is brighter and where shadows are cast NW instead.--- Please view Changeset: 162147962 to see how I mapped the 'property' to in the south of this changeset.--- I hope this helps, Thank you for your contribution.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162139338
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 01:45:18+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164657553
wireguy (2025-02-14 15:07:12+00:00): Stretch, Haymarket relation broken.  Looks like it's at the north 9th street top.
Stretch Longfellow (2025-02-17 00:16:49+00:00): Not surprised; Haymarket is a bit of a mess and I just need to go through and clean up a bunch of things. I'll take a crack at it sometime this week.
Gregory Peony (2025-02-05 02:11:56+00:00): A small tid bit here. Buildings in this area are unlikely to share common walls becasue the roofs are pitched and tend to overhang the building footprint: reference the pictures linked in project instructions.--- Hold alt when mapping to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing nodes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162139589
Gregory Peony (2025-02-05 02:14:20+00:00): You had the right idea with one of the buildings in the SE by estimating its entire footprint even when a tree obscured it. Good job.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162139589
Kriskraskriebel (2025-04-16 10:46:31+00:00): Hoi CartoKees, je hebt met deze update mijn stacaravan gesloopt (156476794). Had ik dat kunnen voorkomen en zo ja: hoe?
Mvg, Kriskras
CartoKees (2025-04-18 16:34:41+00:00): Hoi Kriskraskriebel, dat was niet mijn bedoeling. Ik heb de stacaravan weer teruggezet op de kaart.

Je had er eigenlijk al alles aan gedaan om te voorkomen dat het wordt weggehaald, doordat er geen "source=BAG" bij stond.

Adressen en stacaravans worden over het algemeen uit de BAG (Adressen en Gebouwen registratie) overgenomen in OSM. En dus ook verwijderd uit OSM als ze niet meer in de BAG staan.

Ik heb daar gewoonweg niet op gelet toen ik de stacaravan weghaalde. 


Met vriendelijke groet,

CartoKees
WoSoe (2025-02-06 06:13:49+00:00): Moin!

Was ist der Grund für das Löschen von »landuse« bzw. das Entfernen des tags an einzelnen Flächen?

Siehe rote Linien:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162139766
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162141630

Gruß
WoSoe
a9ef57woi45z48rg (2025-02-06 12:52:44+00:00): Hallo, das hat im Wesentlichen zwei Gründe: zum Einen sind die Polygone falsch gesetzt worden und zum Anderen stimmte die Klassifizierung nicht mit der Realität überein. Zum ersten Punkt: wie z.B. in "https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dfarmland" zu lesen sollen Polygone an Nachbarelemente anschließen. Hier wurde eine Lücke zur Straße gelassen, wodurch zwischen Straße und Ackerfläche ein toter Raum entsteht. Gedanke dahinter war vmtl., die Breite der Straße zu berücksichtigen, dies steht aber bekanntlich dem Gedanken von Vektorkarten entgegen. Durch ein unsauberes Mapping entstanden auch teilweise Überschneidungen mit der Straße (siehe Zoomstufe 19). Zum zweiten Punkt: die "Lichtung" setzt aus vielen Flächen unterschiedlicher Nutzung zusammen, siehe z.B. Luftbilder. Ein Mapping als Ackerfläche ich daher nicht nur irreführend, sondern vielmehr falsch. Grundsätzlich gilt: lieber keine Informationen, als falsche Informationen. Wenn es überhaupt einen richtigen Tag für die gesamte Fläche gäbe, müsste dieser auch anders gesetzt werden. Bisher wurde die Relation inner des umgrenzenden Waldes mit einem Polygon nachgezeichnet, hier müsste dann allerdings vielmehr das bestehene Polygon verwendet und gekennzeichnet werden, da die Grenze von Wald und bewirtschafteter Fläche ja immer zusammenfällt. Zusammenfassend hat sich hier wohl jemand am Tagging von "landuse=..." geübt, aber den Aufwand des Taggings von großen Flächen, die nicht durch Wald begrenzt werden, gescheut.
Viele Grüße
Gregory Peony (2025-02-05 02:23:29+00:00): Some of the buildings which I flagged here have odd shapes. check if it's plausable that the building actually has a more standard shape before going with a more unique option. Zoom in and out to aid your interpretation of feature shape.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162139881
Baloo Uriza (2025-02-05 21:27:19+00:00): foot=designated would mean that there are signs or pavement markings indicating that route is not only open to pedestrians, but the preferred route for pedestrians.  Removing foot=designated from the road and then foot=private (no access without permission) is probably what you're looking for.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162139928
The Invisible Freak (2026-01-17 16:15:36+00:00): Laut Internetseite https://cqsg.de/kontakt handelt es sich bei dem DARC um den Ortsverein R14 Solingen und nicht Mönchengladbach.
vanagaudi (2026-01-18 11:12:54+00:00): Korrekt. Name wird geändert.
Glassman (2025-02-07 00:00:02+00:00): The path was tagged as access=private. Because of that I reverted your edit but did add a tag ownership=private. If you disagree, please explain why. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162139990
Gregory Peony (2025-02-05 02:32:52+00:00): I recommend offseting/aliging any imagery source you use to aid your interpretation it makes it easier to use and if you map anything while viewing another source it'll be aligned with the rest of the map data. Some of the buildings you added in this changeset are valid, but misaligned. --- Other footprints you added here are no longer present in ESRI which is more recent. --- It is a valid technique to map using alternate imagery sources, just remember to scan the area using the newer source before you submit/upload.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162140041
Zol87 (2025-02-05 21:12:54+00:00): There is now 2024 imagery from Cook county which has a more accurate layout. I updated your changes to that.
eggie (2025-02-04 20:20:42+00:00): Dag Marc.. Dit lijkt me niet correct.
Je hebt een gebouw verwijderd en een adres op de gebouwomtrek gezet. 
We taggen bedrijven uitsluiten op de adresnodes. Ik pas het weer aan.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-04 20:23:51+00:00): layer -1 gedeelte al building:part gemapt. Bedrijf naar adresnode
Groet
eggie
eggie (2025-02-04 21:01:51+00:00): en... Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
aixbrick (2025-02-08 09:28:59+00:00): Hallo,
du hast den Supermarkt nun zum 2. Mal neu eingetragen, obwohl dieser bereits hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1337642546 vorhanden ist (zuerst in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161872730 -> von mir wieder gelöscht). Da sich hier lt. Mapillary auch eine Bäckerei befindet, habe ich deinen neuerlichen Eintrg nun umgewandelt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162272497. Wahrscheinlich ist dein lokaler App-Datenstand veraltet, worauf ich in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4605696 schon hingewiesen habe. Bitte prüfe das.
Gruß
markusm1966 (2025-02-11 08:51:45+00:00): Hallo und vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich nutze die App „Organic“; demnach ist der Datenstand hier nicht aktuell. Und dass ich die Meldung zum 2. Mal eingestellt haben soll, war mir nicht bewusst - Sorry dafür ! Ich werde zukünftig die Finger von OSM lassen, das ist wohl für alle Beteiligten besser. VG
aixbrick (2025-02-11 10:55:44+00:00): Direkt die Finger von OSM lassen, muss nicht sein (ich hoffe, das ist durch meinen Kommentar nicht so rübergekommen). :-) Man muss nur etwas im Blick behalten, dass Apps, die einen lokalen Datenstand nutzen (Organic updated den wohl 1x/Monat), nicht immer aktuell sind. Im Zweifel schaut man auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/ nach oder setzt einen Hinweis.
NeisBot (2025-02-06 10:34:32+00:00): Hi Marlo Voss, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over the last days and weeks, you've made at least 35 with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-07 08:56:46+00:00): Hallo CaptainCarte,

danke für deine Anpassung, die ich aber nicht so richtig nachvollziehen kann.

Warst du Vorort oder woher kommt die Information, dass jetzt die gesamte von dir eingetragene Fläche ein Parkplatz ist?

Grüße
CaptainCarte (2025-02-09 12:01:44+00:00): Nein, lief über maproulette. Es war bereits eine Parkplatz Node da, auf dem Luftbild sieht man auch parkende Fahrzeuge.
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-09 20:50:53+00:00): Ok, danke für deine Antwort.

Und weil man dort parkende Fahrzeuge im Luftbild sieht, wurde jetzt eine Fläche für Parkplatz eingezeichnet? Was sprach gegen die Lösung vorher mit der Node?