piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-10 08:13:04+00:00): Fixed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177047714

Thanks @nevw
jasonsuliseo (2026-01-11 02:05:14+00:00): Thanks for the comment. Adjusted accordingly.
rohieb (2026-01-10 01:57:51+00:00): Warum sind Kommentarfelder immer nur so kurz :P Bachverlauf im Süden habe ich leicht angepasst aufgrund von Luftbild GeoBasis-DE/LGLN DOP20 (2026) und Mapbox Satellite.
Bienson (2026-01-11 01:45:55+00:00): Kein amenity=money_transfer.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=money%20transfer?uselang=de

amenity=atm
Leo Slager (2026-01-10 11:50:59+00:00): Added junction=roundabout,
removed oneway=yes.

This is the correct tagging for a roundabout.
Leo Slager (2026-01-10 11:52:16+00:00): Also fixed all broken routerelations on the roundabout.
Tinetto (2026-01-14 04:34:06+00:00): Hi Leo Slager, 

During my edit, I missed to see the yield sign before the junction in recent Mapillary imagery. Thank you for making the corrections. I appreciate the feedback and will exercise greater caution in my edits.
Bienson (2026-01-11 01:40:35+00:00): Hier befindet sich kein Sportzentrum.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-09 12:07:01+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13444490735/history has flag:type = commercial that was added in this edit
what was meant by flag:type=commercial ? How it differs from flag:type=advertising ?
i2004 (2026-01-10 12:25:46+00:00): sabes si el ebus sigue hasta la terminal de colonia express desde parque lezama ?
TheNightRider (2026-02-17 18:24:47+00:00): I've been wondering if E-Bikes could be charged at L2 charging stations, and the answer is yes, with an adapter. Here's one: https://evseadapters.com/products/j1772-ev-adapter-for-ebike/

Even if you had this adapter, the next question is whether you can get the charger to start, because it might require the Tesla app.
TheNightRider (2026-03-01 07:11:43+00:00): No bikes or anything at this station, though, because it's Tesla-only. Just confirmed at Tesla's "Find Us" map, https://www.tesla.com/findus . If you only check Destination Charger > Other EV, this one doesn't show up but others do, all on the east side of Denver (and 1 in Boulder, 1 in Longmont).
fortera_au (2026-01-12 00:29:19+00:00): Hi, you've attached the corner of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1465772868 to the park next to it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177048763
JoeG (2026-01-10 23:09:21+00:00): Hi! This is quite a wide ranging changeset. It seems like it is an automated change of a number of tags + some mass deletions. Could you provide a bit of a description of why these changes and deletions were made?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177049200
donmac703 (2026-01-11 00:17:35+00:00): The trees and water features that were deleted were flagged as "overlapping" in the warnings section of iD. Examining them showed them to be duplicates in the same location, so one of them had to go. The only "automation" involved is that of iD presenting the end user with a list of clickable warnings to examine and disposition.
JoeG (2026-01-11 20:47:36+00:00): Thanks for the explanation and your fixes!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177049200
b-jazz (2026-01-16 18:56:26+00:00): Hey maddog,

I love that you are adding the multipolygons as you map. Thanks for that.

The 7th green wasn't done quite right though. Your multi has the green as one of the inner ways, and then the rough/bunker multi as the other inner. The correct thing to do is set the rough way as the inner, and not the entire multipolygon. Does that make sense?
The rough/bunker multi is correct. It just shouldn't be included in the larger multi. Only the rough way itself needs to be.

If you want me to fix it up, let me know. Otherwise, I'll let you mess around with it. I'll clean it up in next Thursday's pass if it's still there. Thanks.
b-jazz (2026-01-16 18:57:56+00:00): Also, holes shouldn't have the course name in them ("Wizard 1", "Wizard 2", ...) The tagging of course names hasn't really been nailed down, but it will likely be a separate tag on the golf=hole. Just a heads-up that I'll start cleaning those up at some point.
maddog107 (2026-01-16 19:14:12+00:00): ohh ok i understand, i will fix it right now! Also i did Wizard 1, and WIzard 2... because the Wizard Course and the Man O' war course are in the same course boundray, so should i just change the name of the hole to Wizard 1, Wizard 2, etc and then just keep hole number 1, 2, etc 
@b-jazz ?
maddog107 (2026-01-16 19:40:24+00:00): ok i finished editing this, does it look correct?
b-jazz (2026-01-16 19:46:29+00:00): The multi on 7 looks perfect. Thanks!
maddog107 (2026-01-16 19:47:55+00:00): ok NP!
b-jazz (2026-01-16 19:57:35+00:00): There's a discussion on the topic of multiple courses within a golf_course boundary. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:golf%3Dhole

Nothing has been decided, and probably won't be for a long time. That doesn't prevent you/me/others from just starting a defacto standard and getting some traction that way.

What I'd like to see on the "Wizard 7" golf=hole way is this:
* golf=hole
* ref=7
* course_name=Wizard
* name doesn't exist

Again, the standard doesn't exist, but this is the direction I'll be taking things in 2026. If you want to save your work from being replaced, you could start editing in this way. I'm open to discussing other schemes.
maddog107 (2026-01-27 05:25:56+00:00): sorry, just got back to this. I like marking it my way because, in my opinion, even though it might be wrong, if you make the hole number "Wizard 7" or name=Wizard 7, it is easier for people to know. But I guess you are right, there is no standard so i am not sure lol.
maddog107 (2026-01-27 05:33:14+00:00): when i meant know, i mean Know what course it is. Or you can just make the courses two seperate boundrays. But yea, if you do it like that you might have to edit a ton of golf courses like this one 25.82066, -80.34456 . Plus the course boundrays for Doral are really strange because  one of it is marked trump doral and red tiger and golden palm are in the relation, but other than that, the other 2 courses have their own boundray which is strange, so i am getting a bit confused lol.
b-jazz (2026-01-30 19:17:17+00:00): What you (and many, many others) are doing is called "mapping for the renderer". It means adding tags so that a particular "view" of the map by an app or website looks just how you, the mapper, want it to look. The proper thing to do is add things in a structured way so that it is easy to interpret by all. And then those who want to display the data have an easier time understanding the format and can then choose to display it. The ref tag for golf holes should be a simple number from 1 to 18. The course name should be found elsewhere in a known tag. (Ignore the fact that it isn't defined yet get in the way.)

And yes, there will be a ton of golf courses that need editing. Over the past year or two, I've edited over 30,000 golf holes trying to get them standardized. It's a long process, but the goal is to always be moving things towards the "right" way.
maddog107 (2026-01-31 04:49:49+00:00): hmm alright, i will try not making ref tag for golf holes like Wizard 7, i will make it hole 7, and then mark golf:course:name for wizard? course_name doesnt exist yet right? or would different course boundray be better? i am kind of not understanding you lol
maddog107 (2026-01-31 04:50:07+00:00): hole 7 as in just ref number 7
maddog107 (2026-01-31 05:00:28+00:00): Wait actually nvm I get it, I’ll keep ref numbers only (1–18) and remove name=Wizard 7 style naming.  I will tag holes as golf=hole + ref=7 + course_name=Wizard and leave name empty.
b-jazz (2026-01-31 16:30:23+00:00): This sounds right to me. Thanks.
maddog107 (2026-01-31 19:08:09+00:00): ok so will you edit this course or do you want me to do it?
NeisBot (2026-01-10 07:30:09+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13444638386 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Math tutoring center in Naples"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-18 11:22:57+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/177082788
rarad74 (2026-01-10 08:06:37+00:00): Mai baiatule. De abia ai inceput sa editezi si ai fost precum un cancer. Ai facut praf toata soseaua fundeni. Ai lasat parti de drum intrerupte. Ai stricat rutarea. Harta este praf in zona aia si o gramada de utilizatori nu o mai pot folosi. Invata sa desenzi cladiri mai intai si pe urma te bagi la drumuri. Ai cale lunga de invatat.
LessThan3Nodes (2026-01-15 00:31:36+00:00): Hello rarad74,

I've responded to this and the other comments you left regarding Șoseaua Fundeni at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177050774.

Thanks,
-Teddy
colt04 (2026-01-10 05:29:49+00:00): deleted duplicated node
Warin61 (2026-02-08 01:46:09+00:00): Hi
The relation 20065830 Conservation Area - Stevens Wildlife Area is not closed.
NeisBot (2026-01-10 07:28:54+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 48 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/904767829 v4 | 17 crossings
https://osm.org/way/916882469 v1 | 12 crossings
https://osm.org/way/916882472 v2 | 10 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/8402402965 v3
https://osm.org/node/8515826171 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177049756
NeisBot (2026-01-10 07:30:11+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13444695020 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Pediatric dentistry and orthodontics clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 11:22:59+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177369097
(Deleted leftovers after several edits)
rarad74 (2026-01-10 08:09:32+00:00): La fel si aici. Noduri neconectate, sensurile de merts inexistente, ai lasat cate 4 benzi pe fiecare sens - in total 8- ceea ce nu exista. Ai lasat parti de drum lipsa. Data viitoare o sa iti fie blocat temporar contul.
LessThan3Nodes (2026-01-15 00:31:46+00:00): Hello rarad74,

I've responded to this and the other comments you left regarding Șoseaua Fundeni at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177050774.

Thanks,
-Teddy
Ruthless78 (2026-01-19 02:09:39+00:00): Looks like you deleted the bike paths with this change but in the process also deleted the SF Bay Trail relation.  Should have added the relation to the road with the bike paths no longer there to support it.
fortera_au (2026-01-12 00:28:46+00:00): Hi, when you're drawing buildings, it's a good idea to click the building outline once you've drawn it, and then press Q to square it off.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177050198
NeisBot (2026-01-10 07:30:12+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13444670245 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Math tutoring center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 11:23:01+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177369098
(Deleted leftovers after several edits)
Seyruun (2026-01-10 09:56:40+00:00): Thank you for fixing my mistake!
rarad74 (2026-01-10 07:43:49+00:00): Salut. Ai lasat totul neterminat. Nu este necesar doua  benzi separate daca nu stii sa le desenezi. Nu ai pus nici macar sensurile unice de mers pe cele doua benzi. Nu ne batem joc de harta. Las-o asa cum a fost , ca a fost foarte bine!
LessThan3Nodes (2026-01-15 00:30:14+00:00): Salut rarad74.

My name is Teddy, and I'm the Community Lead for Apple's OSM team (#adt). Thank you very much for bringing the issues in this changeset (as well as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177049512 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177049849) to me and my team's attention. LakeTumba's intention here was to update Șoseaua Fundeni to a dual carriageway to reflect the physical median which was recently installed and is visible in Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=44.44526569999999&lng=26.166011400000002&z=19.9&pKey=1178011133980503&focus=photo). Unfortunately, in the process they made several editing errors and left the data in a worse state than it was in before. We're looking into how these errors came to be made in the first place. Thank you again for bringing up this issue, and if you have further feedback on our teams' mapping feel free to reach out to me either via DM here on OSM or by email to osm-feedback@group.apple.com.

Thank you again for keeping such a close eye on the data quality in Romania,
-Teddy
NeisBot (2026-01-10 07:30:13+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13444668663 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Pediatric dentistry clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
MxxCon (2026-01-11 02:58:40+00:00): Gravity Dental Marketing, are you going to add your clients to OSM, at least learn how to do it properly!
This SEO spam have been deleted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177051170
Frans S (2026-03-27 14:00:44+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not map the surrounding courtyard as a building. Check the shadows of buildings.
Best regards
Seyruun (2026-01-10 09:54:48+00:00): Ah, I'm starting to understand how this happens. Thanks again..
Superadlen (2026-01-10 09:15:21+00:00): merci
MxxCon (2026-01-11 03:01:42+00:00): SEO spam deleted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177051723
Hufkratzer (2026-01-10 21:16:19+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1465790788 sieht nicht aus wie eine Reitanlage gemäß leisure=horse_riding . Sieht aus wie ein Reitplatz. Sollte dann besser mit leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian getaggt werden. Vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a/R#Reitstall und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24720573#map=17/47.854408/11.181056&layers=P (Beispiel).
Kann man in JOSM mit dem Preset für "Pferdesport" taggen.
flo2154 (2026-01-11 14:54:48+00:00): Hallo bollyboll,

vielen Dank für deine ganzen Ergänzungen und StreetComplete-Spaziergänge!

In diesem Changeset ist mir ein Fehler aufgefallen: Die Häusertyp-Option „Mehrere Reihenhäuser“ (building=terrace) ist nur dafür gedacht, wenn mehrere Reihenhäuser in OSM als ein Hausumriss gemapped sind.

Hier (wo du sie teilweise sogar extra vorher aufgetrennt hast – danke dafür!) sind das aber dann Einfamilienhäuser (building=house). Man kann diese dann optional noch mit house=terraced verfeinern. Ich habe das in https://osm.org/changeset/177099636 korrigiert, bitte aber in Zukunft beachten :)

Viele Grüße
Flo
bollyboll (2026-01-11 15:50:02+00:00): Hallo Flo,

oje, so ein Mist, da habe ich dann auch einige andere Häuser noch mal nachzuarbeiten!

Ich dachte immer, das sei wie bei semidetached_house, das verwende ich immer für Doppelhäuser und zwar unabhängig davon, ob das Haus geteilt ist oder nicht. Oder ist das auch falsch?

Vielen Dank jedenfalls für den Hinweis!

Viele Grüße
bollyboll
flo2154 (2026-01-11 16:20:28+00:00): Bei building=semidetached_house scheinen beide Mapping-Methoden in Ordnung zu sein:

„Note that duplex buildings sometimes mapped as one building way or two connected building ways. The tag building=semidetached_house is in use for both. So the current use of this tag is not clearly differentiating between them.“ – https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=semidetached_house

Bzw. scheint man sich nicht ganz einig zu sein: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:building%3Dsemidetached_house#is_this_for_half_the_building_or_the_whole_building.3F

Ich denke auftrennen in einzelne Doppelhaushälften (wenn beide eine Hausnummer haben) ist immer schöner. Aber wenn es nur als ein Doppelhaus gemapped ist, hilft der spezielle Building-Type ja auch schonmal und auftrennen ist unterwegs nicht wirklich möglich. Als Armchair-Mapper kann man dann nachträglich nach building=semidetached_house mit mehreren Hausnummern suchen und diese auftrennen.
schabanel (2026-03-03 13:27:25+00:00): Bonjour,

Je suis actuellement en train de mettre à jour des mairies en France à l'aide du projet OMO "Communes avec mairies à vérifier" (https://vps-3fba2a8a.ynh.fr/gestionnaire-de-taches-simple/project/communes-avec-mairies-a-verifier), et j'en arrive à la Bretagne, avec la mairie des Portes de Conglais. Je vois que toutes les mairies déléguée sont bien répertoriées, mais il manque la mairie principale qui se trouve dans les même locaux que la mairie déléguée de Montours. Ne voulant pas tout casser sans votre avis, étant donné que vous travaillez beaucoup sur ce thème dans la région, je vous propose de créer deux noeuds dans le bâtiment afin de conserver l'information de la mairie déléguée et de rajouter l'information de la mairie principale. Cela vous convient-il ? D'avance merci pour votre réponse !
Cordialement,
Simon.
ps : oui je parle trop :)
hydulphe (2026-03-04 06:32:45+00:00): Bonjour Simon,

il se trouve parfois des grappes de mairies déléguées (par exemple, c'est la même chose autour de la Forêt de Boquen) et vous avez tout à fait raison de créer un noeud pour désigner la mairie principale. N'hésitez pas à faire de même si vous trouvez d'autres cas similaires.

Cordialement
Fraxi (2026-07-03 09:18:54+00:00): Здравей! В българската OSM общност е прието имената на улиците да не се изписват с "ул." отпред. "гр." пред Сливен също е излишно, изписва се само името. Повече можеш да видиш на https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bg:WikiProject_Bulgaria#%D0%98%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B8_%D0%B8_%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B4%D0%B8
Аз може да коригирам тези данни, но занапред да знаеш.
Lisfred (2026-01-10 08:57:19+00:00): Stimmt, habe ich auch gesehen
fortera_au (2026-01-12 00:27:04+00:00): Hi there, for the changeset comment, it's better to describe what you're actually changing, otherwise it's not really giving any information to anyone. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments has some good examples.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177053624
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:18:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13444855217 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "متجر لستائر والمفروشات"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 07:25:49+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177670888
(No visible changes after review)
Discostu36 (2026-01-10 09:47:34+00:00): Die Schließung wurde verschoben, weil der neue Standort noch nicht fertiggestellt ist
eggie (2026-01-10 09:48:27+00:00): Hi.. Welcome to OSM. I Merged your info with the present addressnode.

Greetz,
eggie
[RO]Daniel (2026-01-10 10:00:48+00:00): Thank you!
aTarom (2026-01-10 14:11:44+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, una curiosidad el housename "Hitman" es real?
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363850194/history
y el housenumber "3.5"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363850192/history
es quizás 2,5 con ",", entiendo que es un error normal de mapear a pie de calle con la app, pero antes de cambiar nada prefiero preguntar, saludos
AllotmentCyclist (2026-01-10 15:01:13+00:00): HITMAN, maybe was HILMAN

3-5 was 3a,3b,3c,3d,3e and 5a,5b,5c.


Please feel free to correct, thanks for asking.
eggie (2026-01-10 10:00:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. Svp geen spatie in postcode. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
mlohnen (2026-01-12 09:18:48+00:00): Hoi,
Bedankt voor het welkomstwoord! ;-)
Ik ga de tips doornemen en zal volgende keer geen spatie in de postcode doen.
Groeten,
mlohnen
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:18:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13444892368 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Math tutoring center for students"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-25 07:25:49+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted
rempshaener (2026-01-10 21:51:32+00:00): Hallo
zu diesem Änderungssatz habe ich eine  Anmerkung:
Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie. 
Viele Grüße
AdrianFWBZ (2026-01-12 17:24:34+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis,
Habe nun alle gelöst.

Grüße
rempshaener (2026-01-12 19:05:40+00:00): Danke dir
A67-A67 (2026-01-10 12:25:04+00:00): Foutieve en buggy wijziging teruggedraaid.
A67-A67 (2026-01-10 12:26:25+00:00): Foutieve en buggy wijziging teruggedraaid
ceirios (2026-01-10 10:34:53+00:00): Hi Steven,

Can you please use closed ways when adding landuse, instead of the multipolygon method?

The multipolygon method makes things really difficult for people on other editors.

Diolch
Ceirios