piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2024-05-19 02:35:04+00:00): Hi foxworth22, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/way/1284546928
https://osm.org/way/1284546925
https://osm.org/way/1284546926

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-19 07:41:38+00:00): Hello foxworth22,
Please do not add fictional beaches to the map. The areas you have added which are not beaches such as those outside of buildings or along the edge of sports fields will be removed.
foxworth22 (2024-05-19 19:39:20+00:00): WoodWoseWulf,
I think you misunderstand. The beach is not along the edge of a sports field but rather against the edge of a stream. Satellite View clearly shows the sand and pebbles of the beach.
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-19 20:15:29+00:00): You added a beach here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/39.7200793/-104.9033204
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1284541348/history)
For example.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-21 17:31:57+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151521983
BCNorwich (2024-05-21 06:34:26+00:00): Hi,
Duplicated highways Way: 1284548136 and Way: 1284548143 removed.

Please take care not to duplicate highways as it could disrupt routing.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2024-05-21 06:37:10+00:00): Also removed highway Way: 1284548144
BCNorwich (2024-05-22 06:37:44+00:00): Also removed Way: 1284548142
MIKO5FE82J (2024-05-19 02:58:27+00:00): nice
i2004 (2024-05-19 13:39:53+00:00): Te hice los otros ramales del 85
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
DaveF (2024-05-20 14:59:34+00:00): Hi Please don't remove area tags from platforms as there's a bug in OSM-Carto which can prevent it from rendering correctly.
Gregory Peony (2024-05-21 16:10:30+00:00): I was unaware of that, thanks for letting me know. I'll keep it in mind for the future.

I was going off of the public_transport=platform page on the OSM wiki when mapping: it stated that the area tag was not required. It does however, conradict the platform=railway page ,which states that the area tag is necessary. 

If you know more about it and want to spread the word you may wish to edit or add to the OSM wiki pages, and/or inform someone responsible for the rendering of the map (if this is in fact a bug).
gdt (2025-09-30 13:16:01+00:00): I just noticed this (adding the cell antenna), and "residential" seemed wrong, as L3 Parcels show it not as a legal street.   So I have changed it to service.  The change to residential was long ago, in a huge changeset, with a gibberish comment, referencing Bing -- which makes no sense.

Can you explain the name?  Is there a road name?   Is this way used for anything other than water/cell-tower access?

Is there a gate?  Surely this is locked and access private but that's "surely" not seeing it on the ground.
s777n (2024-05-26 14:36:04+00:00): Здравствуйте. Почему вы удалили адрес у этого здания? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/777455790/history
desk77 (2024-05-27 09:09:05+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Я увидел рядом здание с таким же номером и видимо случайно удалил адрес.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/777455791#map=18/54.81772/56.37477
Похоже у обоих зданий одинаковый адрес, объединил их в полигон.
woodpeck (2024-05-19 18:43:59+00:00): Hello alfred476, not every change to a boundary is automatically a reason for a revert. If you revert changes to boundaries in the future, please be more specific about why that particular change is assumed to be a mistake, or link to a forum discussion or an unsuccesful attempt to engage the mapper in question.
eggie (2024-05-19 07:07:56+00:00): review_requested
  	yes
Je vraagt feedback  Lijkt me oke zo.
MVG
eggie
simartin82 (2024-05-19 07:47:54+00:00): Bedankt!
mikimapbuilder (2024-05-20 06:09:51+00:00): Driveways usually has no name. This one was removed since it seemed descriptive.
Samokat (2024-05-19 05:38:59+00:00): *Скорректировал велодорожки на "Велосипедная и пешеходная дорожка". Удалил тег cycleway=shared_lane ориентируюясь на статью: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway=cycleway
Также добавил недостающие пешеходные дороги и пешеходный переход.
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 11:19:57+00:00): Thanks for your contribution in adding building mapping. The mapping looks nice and clear understanding of changeset comments. Keep Contributing, Cheers!!!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151519474
pesec (2024-05-20 07:55:43+00:00): Оценка за задание - 2
углы должны быть прямыми, контур рисуется по стенам, а не по крыше.
felipeeugenio (2024-05-19 15:10:48+00:00): duplicado
tastrax (2024-05-20 04:29:56+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Peter W34 (2024-05-20 06:44:52+00:00): No problem. I don’t usually add phone numbers. Just copied what was in the note there. Forgot about the +61 thing. Peter
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-05-19 20:14:48+00:00): Nice. 

If you're in the area, could you please check what kind of sign/road marking is here at the beginning of the "Peedu kergliiklustee"? The name suggests that bicycles should be allowed there, but access tags on it are confusing with only foot=designated

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4230929
olo81 (2024-05-20 04:57:54+00:00): Most został wyburzony.  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1284574238
ivanbranco (2024-05-20 12:37:15+00:00): Ciao Lola Fox,

secondo me sarebbe meglio evitare di utilizzare highway e waterway come outer di un farmland, é come dire che metà strada e metà corso d'acqua sono campi agricoli, quando invece sono metà asfalto e metà acqua ovviamente, essendo le way disegnate per convenzione al centro delle strade/corsi d'acqua.

In un caso hai addirittura utilizzato un ponte come outer per l'area natural=water, quando questi elementi non dovrebbero avere neanche un nodo in comune non essendo a contatto (il corso d'acqua passa sotto il ponte).
ivanbranco (2024-05-20 13:15:32+00:00): Ad esempio, Villa Prati era mappata come una relazione avente un solo membro outer. Inoltre sia l'outer che la relazione erano impostati come inner del multipoligono del farmland circostante, quindi un inner duplicato.
Lola Fox (2024-05-20 18:54:28+00:00): Si, in teoria e sulla carta hai indubbiamente ragione tu. Ma non consideri alcuni punti: 1) Quello che sostieni comporta un numero molto maggiore di linee che contribuiscono ad una difficoltà di fare modifiche oltre che ad una maggior confusione visiva. Quante volte ci siamo inbattutti in un intreccio di linee per le quali sarebbero state necessarie almeno la metà? 2) Una carta geografica è un adattamento 2D della realtà 3D. Dunque, è vero che un ponte sta sopra un canale, ma ai fini della sostanza, se ci pensi, non cambia nulla, anzi, come detto prima, hai un utilizzo più logico delle linee, che sono ridotte al minimo. 3) Così come al punto 2, è vero che una strada o un canale si trova metà in una farmland, ma è anche vero che ai fini del database e del rendering, non cambia sostanzialmente nulla, dove "sostanzialmente" fa la differenza, fatto salvo sempre la già citata ottimizzazione delle linee di confine tra aree adiacenti.
eggie (2024-05-19 15:20:14+00:00): Je verwijdert steeds de BAG data?
Svp alleen de winkel verwijderen.
rskedgell (2024-05-21 09:52:26+00:00): You appear to have tagged some sections of Watling Street and the A5 roundabout as foot=no in response to a StreetComplete task asking "Are pedestrians forbidden to walk on this road here?"

I have checked the available Bing Streetside and/or Mapillary imagery for evidence that there really is a (signed) pedestrian prohibition here. I cannot see any TSRGD diagram 625.1 "pedestrians prohibited" signs on the imagery, so do not believe that a prohibition exists and have therefore reverted your edit.

The wiki states that access tags reflect legal access. Subjective opinions about whether it would be pleasant, a good idea, safe, etc. for a particular transport mode are not relevant to legal access.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot

As real pedestrian prohibitions on public roads other than those tagged as highway=motorway or motorroad=yes in the UK are quite rare and are always signed, this quest is probably better left disabled.
Keith Barnett (2024-05-21 14:59:34+00:00): Thanks for the feedback, and you are correct.
I'll disable that task going forwards.
rskedgell (2024-05-21 15:24:11+00:00): Thanks!

Please keep up the good work with StreetComplete, that quest aside it's one of the best tools available to improve OpenStreetMap.
eggie (2024-05-19 17:10:50+00:00): BAG data hersteld
Ruben Van de Velde (2024-06-18 08:47:03+00:00): Joachim, bedankt voor je enthousiasme, maar deze fietspaden waren al getagd op de naastliggende autoweg, met `cycleway:right=lane` of `cycleway:right=track`; het is niet nodig om ze dan nog als aparte ways in the tekenen. Bovendien waren je nieuwe fietspaden niet verbonden met de zijstraten, waardoor ze niet bruikbaar waren voor routeplanners.
JoachimClaeys (2024-06-18 10:56:50+00:00): He Ruben. Excuses

Maar ik vond deze manier van fietspaden tekenen en aangeven ( use_sidepath )  op veel locaties. Zie bijvoorbeeld Oudenaardsesteenweg https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=18/51.02347/3.70959

Antwerpsesteenweg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=18/51.08506/3.79819

Wist niet dat dit een foute manier was? 

Thanks
MxxCon (2024-05-20 06:50:59+00:00): Hello.
Please note, as documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:year_of_construction this tag must be used ONLY for the finished construction and the dates in its values must NEVER include dates in the future.
This should be corrected.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151521648
JozefM (2024-05-20 15:06:33+00:00): Have removed the year_of_construction tag from unfinished buildings on this changeset; Is there a good tag to capture when construction started?
Leo Slager (2024-05-19 16:32:30+00:00): Dag Timo,
Bij een volgende keer graag de source:date ook laten staan.
silversurfer83 (2024-05-19 12:31:51+00:00): Moin :)

ein Hinweis, bzw. eine Bitte:
Nutze doch die vorhandenen Daten. Der Teich war seit 2009 erfasst
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/30278043
Jetzt ist das weg und sieht so aus, als wärst du der erste, der ihn eingezeichnet hat. Das ist eher unschön und verstößt gegen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

bitte in Zukunft beachten. Danke.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151521863
mcliquid (2024-05-19 07:42:09+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Qwests (2024-05-19 08:06:02+00:00): Hi, okay i sorry i'am new here
silversurfer83 (2024-05-19 12:41:04+00:00): And we're happy to have you :)

since you already received a link to the wiki: just have a look, before mapping. Maybe start out small in an area you know very well.
With time, you'll get the hang of it and should there be questions you can always find help 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels

happy mapping
eggie (2024-05-19 14:45:21+00:00): Hoi Lijkt me oke... De twee vlakken construction heb ik samengevoegd.
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2024-05-19 17:32:19+00:00): Aanvraag BAG import loopt https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/2183
eggie (2024-05-19 15:18:52+00:00): Je verwijdert steeds de BAG data,, Wanneer je iets niet begrijpt laat het dan staan.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-19 17:09:45+00:00): En hier haal je weer de BAGdata weg. Waarom?
Hersteld.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-19 15:17:03+00:00): BAG data hersteld.
felipeeugenio (2024-05-19 15:08:10+00:00): reversado
felipeeugenio (2024-05-19 15:05:06+00:00): Hola, el tag building es para ediificios y estructuras. no para el recinto completo.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-29 18:28:33+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11917356757/history has fixme:type = building that was added in this edit
Is it an attempt to map a building not present in OSM data? Is it an attempt to add address info to an already mapped building? Something else?

See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/21o2 for more objects with this problem
felipeeugenio (2024-05-19 15:04:06+00:00): Hola
S/N no es un número.
Si el recinto no tiene número usar nohousenumber=yes
gracias
Ian Wagner (2024-11-13 06:31:34+00:00): I noticed this because there is a URL in the address field, which is obvious wrong. It also appears to be in the middle of the street.

I was going to make some edits, but could you confirm first that, since there is a Google Maps link, that this shop was not copied from Google?

Thanks!
joost schouppe (2024-05-21 07:55:37+00:00): Thanks for improving the path here. Do you happen to know if these paths allow access or not? Currently the paths in the Bois de Broctiaux are marked private because the access from the north is clearly marked private.
TopiBe92 (2024-05-21 11:21:56+00:00): I went there yesterday and i didn't see any private sign at the entrance of this path (but i didn't see any sign neither on crossing with private path). We can let on allow access for now, I will check again more in depth in the coming weeks.
aceman444 (2026-03-14 14:59:13+00:00): Na tychto miestach nie su ziadne vchody do budov, chodniky idu po terase, po strechach garazi. Pozor na to.
SekeRob (2024-06-11 17:06:22+00:00): Hi,

Please read this wiki on loc_name.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Local_names_(loc_name)

It says that if this is the going name it can be included in the name field, where it was for 11 years, since first being mapped. I agree since now the map shows blank and apps such as Streetcomplete have already been asking about a name absent the correct tag of noname=yes, where noofficial_name looks like your creation solely for this road.

There is in fact also a track going by the Inferno moniker along a stream. I've cycled it once... it took time, best not try when it was raining the previous days.

Let me know.

ciao
SekeRob (2025-04-12 14:13:34+00:00): Hi,

Hi

(Strada) Valle dell'Inferno is real to include what a resident on that street told me, very unhappy about the Via da Dinominare label on the direction sign just before the roundabout,
Also Strada della Fonte is real, the name drawn from the 'La Fonte' sign on that road (mapped that source with roof today.

https://d2exd72xrrp1s7.cloudfront.net/www/1x/1xwq24f73mijvw7x8j39imx6m5chlbjdh-p564406349-full/1962544209a?width=3072&height=2304&crop=false&q=70

https://d2exd72xrrp1s7.cloudfront.net/www/1x/1xp9zloqnd4yx37ln00zr49ac5chlbcdj-p564406239-full/1962543fd7f?width=3072&height=2304&crop=false&q=70
tg4567 (2024-06-03 18:42:48+00:00): why are you removing commons tags?  it's a legitimate tag that is growing very fast: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons
KevinOs (2024-05-23 18:57:02+00:00): Thanks! Was unable to replicate the issue bike bike nudge nudge had (I suspect the reason for your change) and didn't realize the one-way bike tag was also required in these counter flows, as I thought it was implied by the cycleway tags. Thanks for the fix!! Will seek out others in the city that are setup similar.
ablevi202 (2024-05-24 22:03:54+00:00): Hi! please dont add in fake stuff for pokemon go. I've reverted these two edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151789647
shahintofighi (2025-11-10 21:54:53+00:00): این اسم افق اشتباه و مربوط به 2 کوچه بالا تر میباشد. اسم این شهرک ساحلی ، شهرک ژوئن میباشد
ElliottPlack (2024-05-22 17:45:34+00:00): Thanks for the mapping here!! One comment would be the bleachers at Unitas Stadium. I visited the main grandstand recently and think it is better tagged as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dgrandstand because there is an indoor portion where the club level is, with an elevator etc. What do you think?
Tex2002ans (2024-06-11 22:47:22+00:00): YES to `building=grandstand`.

Do you want to update them?

- - -

Random Note: I didn't even know that "grandstands" existed as an option (until very recently)!

I only started OSM about 2 months ago, and definitely wasn't mapping big stadiums. (Mostly just baseball/sports fields in small parks/schools which only had bleachers.)

Usually when I arrive at bigger stadiums, they were already mapped!
yrtimiD (2024-05-19 13:47:27+00:00): Hello and welcome,
I guess you shifted all these items to fix Bing aerial images. In many cases aerial images are not perfectly aligned to coordinates and should be firstly aligned to real GPX tracks before used.
You can do this by opening 
Background side panel, expand Overlays and then check "OpenStreetMap GPS traces".
If there are gpx tracks in the area - you can use "Imagery Offset" tools in the same panel to shift the map.
Only after aerial images are aligned with GPX - you can use it for the mapping.
In your specific case it looks like the original position of items were correct, so I'd recommend reverting your change. I can help you with revert or you can read here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Change_rollback
Tomas Straupis (2024-05-20 08:32:34+00:00): Keitimas atšauktas. Gatvių pavadinimai tvarkomi pusiau-automatiškai pagal VMS duomenis.
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 11:18:29+00:00): Thank you for your contribution in mapping. This aquaculture ponds mapping look great and also the clear changeset comment. Keep Contributing, Cheers!!!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151525254
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-19 09:40:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9418568564
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1079608060

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
s777n (2024-05-19 10:06:39+00:00): Дубль этой точки. Откатил. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11197352787
Jordi MF (2024-05-19 10:33:18+00:00): La manera de cómo debe añadirse la información en OpenStreetMap tiene que debatirse. No puedes mapear como tú quieras. Hasta ahora, mapear según una ley comarcal oficial y según la cartelería externa de los pueblos es el criterio adoptado por la comunidad. Si quieres cambiarlo, debate con la comunidad.
RaphaelPasloin (2024-05-19 10:17:31+00:00): Hello,

From where came this name "Hôtel" ? In wikidata the name is from 2017 "Ancien atelier et maison du peintre Parmentier" and unchanged since today by you. 

I can not find a reference that describe this building by this name ; can you give a source ? In any case the name of the heritage classification should be at least indicated.

Have a good day.
JhowieNitnek (2024-05-19 10:21:41+00:00): I read about it a while ago but I don't remember the name of the book I read it in. But if you think it is safer in the meanwhile to remove the name I will do it
APneunzehn74 (2025-08-21 12:05:00+00:00): Hallo, diese Car pooling Mitfahrbank in diesem Chargenset ist das vielleicht eine https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dhitchhiking wie im Wiki beschrieben?
Grüße APneunzehn74
miluethi (2024-05-19 13:08:48+00:00): Hi Marusah7,

Please square out your buildings by pressing the "Q" key with a selected buiding. I have to delete some of your shapes, I'm sorry.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
MxxCon (2024-05-20 06:54:33+00:00): Hello.
You tagged this building as semi-detached, but this building is not attached to anything else...
Could you please elaborate on this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151527781
dannmer (2024-05-20 07:36:22+00:00): It’s a twin home or duplex
MxxCon (2024-05-20 07:44:34+00:00): Then it should be split/mapped as 2 buildings tagged as semi-detached.
Famlam (2024-05-20 10:07:41+00:00): Hi, just to be sure, shouldn't the left side of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/628813818 be oneway=yes?

I'm not a local, just stumbled upon this by coincident :)
Yunan973 (2024-07-25 17:07:46+00:00): Bonjour,

le code Fantoir se met sur les rues ou les relation de rue (associatedstreet), jamais sur les points des adresses, cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:ref:FR:FANTOIR.

J'en ai corrigé quelques uns mais il y a on dirait beaucoup de ménage à faire : https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1OJP
Kurosawa06 (2024-07-25 19:52:06+00:00): Merci pour cette correction. Je vais corriger fur et à mesure. Je garde le script dans un bloc-note.

Encore merci !
Yunan973 (2024-07-27 16:24:13+00:00): A mon avis pas très urgent : si tu élargis la zone à toute la France (en supprimant le "timeout" au début du script sinon le délai sera dépassé et le script plante) tu verras qu'il y a plus de 150 000 points avec un code Fantoir.
Sur la Guyane (où je suis), il n'y en a qu'une dizaine (j'y suis pour rien) mais ceux là sont normaux (des lieux-dits principalement, un des rares cas où on met le code sur un point).
ainki (2024-05-21 09:05:25+00:00): Hei, saisinko syyn miksi olet poistanut piirtämäni puustoalueet ja osan kallioista ja vaihtanut siihen päälle metsän? Olisi ystävällistä jos vastaisit.
liljaadeliina (2024-11-20 13:31:32+00:00): 

¨¨
RedRocker87 (2024-06-03 18:48:37+00:00): There is a beach at this ocation. There is a point of intrest in both ingress and pokemon go called Playground and Beach, with a photo of the beach
RedRocker87 (2024-06-03 18:54:07+00:00): https://intel.ingress.com/?pll=53.530605,-2.669468&z=15
AR_Mapper (2024-06-04 07:13:22+00:00): Hi. This source is not publicly accessible to review. Regardless, Ingress is not an acceptable source of information for edits; Only sources with compatible licenses (usually in the public domain) may be used as bases for adding OSM data.
RedRocker87 (2024-06-04 09:40:30+00:00): "Local knowledge" is a valid source. I used a link to show that the bing images which you said you were referencing are outdated.
mcliquid (2024-05-20 06:41:30+00:00): Hallo, bitte lasse den AED bestehen, der Zugang ist bereits auf Privat gesetzt.
rskedgell (2024-05-21 08:29:34+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I have re-tagged this as amenity=parking_space and added a little more detail to the surroundings.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space
eggie (2024-05-19 11:40:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community