piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rempshaener (2025-11-17 18:05:58+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.

Ich habe nur zwei Anmerkungen:
Hier www.openstreetmap.org/way/73273412 steht noch der alte Name.
Und bei den Adressen müsste der Straßenname noch angepasst werden, betroffen sind https://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B%0Aarea%5Bname%3D%22Sch%C3%B6nwald%22%5D%3B%0Anwr%5B%22addr%3Astreet%22%3D%22Virchovstra%C3%9Fe%22%5D%28area%29%3B%0Aout%20geom%3B&C=50.199868%3B12.094304%3B18&R=

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
trigpoint (2026-04-14 18:20:47+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/181336246
JulesGabrielVerne (2026-01-27 09:20:26+00:00): Dlaczego drogę https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218443800 oznaczyłeś jako "gravel"? To jest asfaltowa droga
grelus (2026-01-28 06:53:00+00:00): Jesteś pewny, że to jest asfalt? Gdy ostatnio tam przejeżdżałem i zaglądnąłem to było widać kruszywo. Fakt, że w miarę nowe i gładkie. Tu sytuacja z grudnia 2025: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1541740723698773
b-jazz (2025-11-18 03:11:03+00:00): RE: https://osm.org/way/1451392555

When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. If you could go back and clean up where you've made this mistake, that would be helpful. But more importantly, if you could stop from doing this in the future, it would be greatly appreciated. Please read the wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out.
Branko Kokanovic (2025-11-19 16:44:50+00:00): Changeset je super, ne komentarišem zbog toga:), primetio sam ga na https://dina.openstreetmap.rs/st/wrong_names/BELA%20CRKVA.html. Ako ikad vidiš još ovakvih stvari, javi da ispravim kako normalizujemo RGZ ulicu!
iandees (2025-11-17 19:59:37+00:00): It looks like you placed this camera in the middle of the turn lane. Can you describe where you saw it so we can move it to a more accurate position?
000000001666 (2025-11-17 20:02:38+00:00): Oh sorry that one was a accident that flock camera was are already marked but I added sum in Brooklyn center and Brooklyn park were I seen them in exact spot
iandees (2025-11-17 20:03:55+00:00): Ok, no problem! I'll remove this one.
000000001666 (2025-11-17 20:05:24+00:00): Ok thank u
000000001666 (2025-11-19 04:26:24+00:00): Also been using this and then looking on google map to confirm its location 
https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/data-and-reports/agencies-use-lprs-lpr
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-11-17 19:21:45+00:00): Hello, why did you change these named roads to service roads? Generally speaking, service roads are unnamed access roads to properties. Palazzo Drive is signed and wider than a parking aisle or driveway, so it should be an unclassified road.
VLD062 (2025-11-17 20:30:39+00:00): Hi, Flap Slimy Outward
I modified the tagging from highway=unclassified to highway=service because, according to the OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified), highway=unclassified is meant for minor public roads that act as through routes in rural or suburban areas. These are usually roads that connect different parts of a town or countryside, not roads whose main purpose is to provide access to a specific place like a hotel, parking lot, or loading zone.

On the other hand, according to the OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice),  highway=service tag is for roads that give access to specific facilities—like parking lots, driveways, alleys, or delivery areas. Since this road leads to amenities such as stores  and drop-off/loading zones, it fits the definition of a service road. The service=driveway tag, is also  a common and recommended combination to be used with highway=service tag according to the highway=service wiki.
For what it’s worth, there are quite a few named service roads in Las Vegas, so it seems naming alone isn’t unusual for this type of road. 
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2fE9


Hope to hear from you soon, 
Jesspher/ VLD062
Comino (2025-11-17 18:16:06+00:00): You forgot to add the address details.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-17 23:26:28+00:00): przypominam że takie edycje zmian klasyfikacji dróg powinny być dyskutowane na forum, na https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40

w przeciwnym razie każdy może je wycofać, bez dalszych powodów
user_23310066 (2025-11-18 15:46:20+00:00): no na kazdej mapie ten t ta droga byla zaznaczona.
tsinoitisoppo (2025-11-18 15:57:03+00:00): przed zamknięciem przejścia była primary, jak DK65 od Białegostoku do Bobrowników
theDM (2025-11-19 20:46:29+00:00): była, ale zmieniliśmy definicję trunk, po nowemu kwalifikuje się na trunk
user_23310066 (2025-11-23 14:08:32+00:00): @tsinoitisoppo bo wtedy była inna definicja trunka
dknelson9876 (2025-11-18 02:16:24+00:00): I don't think this is a correct use of mascot:iconography=*. While BYU does use a Y in branding and materials, they do also use an actual cougar, so mascot:iconography is not necessary.
Ziemowit Zabawa (2025-11-24 06:14:54+00:00): Widzę podjąłeś mój temat z zestawów zmian 146439617 i 171974001. W sumie tak też można jak ty zrobiłeś, ale musiałem koniecznie poprawić parę motorway na primary ze względu na położenie znaków D-7 i D-8 w terenie (zestaw zmian 175030063).
Ferrocarriles de México (2025-11-23 19:54:05+00:00): We do not tag stops with `railway=station`. This is incorrect.
stan_ (2025-11-23 20:25:28+00:00): Please explain me how it works. I'm following this graphic: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Railway-station-tagging_simple.svg
According to this, the building should be tagged as building=railway station (independent from the actual station), while the station itself is located in the the tracks.
The railway=stop is something else.
For the station name: there's no explaination on this link, but compared with usage in other areas of the world, "station" (or in this case "Estación") seems not to be part of the station name.
Ferrocarriles de México (2025-11-23 20:57:53+00:00): There is nothing else to tag regarding train stations on the Ferrocarril Transístmico. I already homogenized the tagging. There is nothing you need to change regarding tagging.

The scheme we follow is mostly as in the SVG guide you linked, but we map `railway=station` as an area (the plot of the railway station) and `public_transport` tags are omitted since they are entirely redundant.
Ferrocarriles de México (2025-11-23 20:59:41+00:00): The name of the stations are treated inconsistently in the official documents, sometimes with "Estación" included and sometimes not, for the same station. For homogenity, we went with always including "Estación".
Ferrocarriles de México (2025-11-23 19:57:57+00:00): These edits are wrong. These stations are already correctly tagged. We do not put `building=station` on the outline of the station plot.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175040216
mpnjr (2026-04-14 09:33:16+00:00): Jetzt überschneiden sich leider Coldewei (5663330) und der hier auf die Flurgrenze angepasste Schilldeich (5663332). In Deutschland ist es sogar die einzige signifikante Überschneidung zweier Objekte mit admin_level=11 und gleicher Hierarchieebene.

Vielleicht eine neue gemeinsame Grenze über das Geld ziehen?
Ropino (2026-04-14 18:59:02+00:00): Hi,
ich hatte mich bei Schilldeich an der "Strich-3xPunkt"-Linie in ALKIS orientiert.
Für admin_level=11 sieht es mit (Detaildaten-)Quellen -wie auch hier- leider oft sehr dünn aus.
---
"Meine" Eintragungen dürfen gern geändert werden. ;)
VG
Ferrocarriles de México (2025-11-23 19:57:58+00:00): These edits are wrong. These stations are already correctly tagged. We do not put `building=station` on the outline of the station plot.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175040216
tuxayo (2025-11-17 18:41:02+00:00): Ah mince, fausse manip!!!! Je vais voir comment revert proprement
tuxayo (2025-11-17 18:47:03+00:00): C'est bon c'est corrigé https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174785551
Константин Гам (2025-11-27 15:20:29+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Огромная просьба НЕ ВНОСИТЬ непроверенные данные!
ЖК ещё строится. Приезжайте на местность, и когда убедились, делайте такие радикальные правки!
Константин Гам (2025-11-27 16:45:54+00:00): И удалять слова из названия не стоит...
tuxayo (2025-11-17 18:47:23+00:00): Fait avec https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter
user_5359 (2025-11-18 08:25:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/5832330137
 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
NeisBot (2025-11-17 18:56:37+00:00): Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added fire hydrants with names and coupling details"
NeisBot (2025-11-17 18:56:37+00:00): Hi FF Goeflan, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #NoComment
grzegorz75jan (2025-11-17 21:56:43+00:00): Po twoich edycjach pozostaje bardzo dużo pojedynczych węzłów bez znaczników. Niektóre leżą osobno a niektóre nakładają się na węzły różnych obiektów.

Zwracaj uwagi na informacje o błędach. Edytory wyświetlają takie a w Josm możesz użyć opcji  sprawdź jeszcze przed wysłaniem a dodatkowo sam edytor przed wysłaniem sam sprawdza więc proszę nie przyklepywać wysyłania prostych błędów.

Już nie mam czasu wnikać ale w jednej edycji tworzysz jakieś obszary a w kolejnych usuwasz i tak w kółko.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174785852
Glassman (2025-11-18 21:36:28+00:00): Please check the spelling of the building name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174786344
Frans S (2026-03-16 14:07:26+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
Despite this task being mapped 4 months ago, I want to react to your mappings.
Often you map a yard as a building.
And clustered buildings, 
Walled objects, without a roof are not to be mapped as a building.  
Best regards
osmviborg (2025-11-18 07:16:49+00:00): Du har tegnet mange separate cykelstier. Vejene stierne løber langs er i forvejen tagget med 'cycleway=track', det giver en dublering af cykelstier. Rydder du selv op?
osmviborg (2025-11-18 07:19:23+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstivejledning
TT_Roskilde (2025-11-18 07:58:30+00:00): Mange tak for info, det er godt du er opmærksom.
Der er meget at lære her :)
Jeg rydder op hurtigst muligt
Mvh. Tom
osmviborg (2025-11-18 08:00:38+00:00): 👍
Szymson (2025-11-17 19:22:03+00:00): Cały budynek nazywa się Marina Dental Clinic? Śmiem wątpić
Szymson (2025-11-17 19:22:27+00:00): Po co w takim razie jeszcze został dodany sam punkt z tagiem name?
Szymson (2025-11-17 19:23:45+00:00): Wycofałem ten zestaw zmian. Przed podjęciem kolejnych edycji zapraszam do lektury:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/chce-dodac-swoja-firme-do-mapy-w-osm-watek-ogolny/135487
Fgjgdrou (2025-12-08 12:32:34+00:00): Hi, I've noticed that on nodes 13175588681 and 13175588682 that you've removed fixmes without doing any changes to the nodes themselves. Could you please either change them as appropriate so that the line each sign refers to is clear, or explain why you removed them without changes?
Thank you!
Mludford (2025-12-08 14:39:07+00:00): Hello, I have made changes, I have tagged the signs with railway:signal:speed_limit:turn_direction, this should distinguish the signs as this is how they are distinguished on the ground (via direction arrows)
Fgjgdrou (2025-12-08 14:47:24+00:00): Whilst that distinguishes the turn direction after a junction, it does not distinguish if the signs apply to the line to the west or the east, or both (as in, if they will be followed by a train on the western, eastern, or both lines, the lines being referred to as the ones before the junction).
Also, whilst it refers to the direction of travel (forward/backward), which can be inferred by a person, it is not possible for a data consumer to infer which direction the signs apply to and thus display that without the signs being attached to a track way.
Fgjgdrou (2025-12-08 14:47:50+00:00): That is principally what I was trying to get at, thanks!
Mludford (2025-12-08 14:59:04+00:00): The signs are now attached to the way, however I would also say that the relevant ways are also tagged with the correct speed restrictions, this may aid any confusion
Mludford (2025-12-08 15:00:37+00:00): See Changeset: 175671498
Fgjgdrou (2025-12-08 15:02:45+00:00): Yep, I see the changes now which solve it, thank you!
mueschel (2025-11-18 14:20:02+00:00): Hi,
please check your tags. There are no keys like "vending4" in other places. Please check the wiki for the correct tags.
Steine42 (2025-12-04 16:28:59+00:00): Hi kpedido, 
der Zigarettenautomat 13311650802 in diesem Änderungssatz sieht nach einer Dublette aus.
Im Änderungssatz 174787342 wurde mit gleichen Koordinaten auch ein Zigarettenautomat 13311631715 angelegt. Der Änderungssatz hat zudem die gleiche Beschreibung wie dieser, evtl. wurden daher mehr Dubletten angelegt.
bartgron (2025-11-26 20:49:47+00:00): Obiekty zostały usunięte
bartgron (2025-11-26 20:50:38+00:00): Drogi zostały usunięte
eggie (2025-11-18 14:58:05+00:00): Een adresnode is geen building.
Ik heb die regel verwijderd. Het kan wel op het gebouw zelf.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=174788518

MVG
eggie
donux-nl (2025-11-18 15:08:41+00:00): Klopt het dat de adresnode nu is verdwenen?
eggie (2025-11-18 15:17:25+00:00): Nee hoor 41T staat er gewoon.
Alleen omdat je andere tags zet op de adresnode verdwijnt de rendering van het nummer. Net als bij winkels.
eggie (2025-11-18 15:18:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2821193250

Een transformatorhuisje heeft geen postcode..
b-jazz (2025-11-18 03:08:08+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1451431546

When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. Take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Golf.png for an example of the "Wrong" way to map a fairway and a green along with the right way. There are some cases where a fringe exists around a green and you should draw the fairway outline completely around a green, leaving room for the fringe. Other times, the fairway and green butt up against each other. In that case the fairway and green should share the same nodes at the boundary between the two, and every node at the boundary needs to be shared leaving no gaps. When drawing these shared nodes, editors like iD (built into openstreetmap.org) will "snap" to an existing node if you get close enough. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out. Thanks.
eggie (2025-11-18 14:54:16+00:00): Dag donux  Verbind een bollard altijd met het wegdeel middels een verbindingsnode.
Die paaltjes aan de zijkant is ongebruikelijk. Kwaad kan het niet. 
De taal is UK English  Dus gebruik colour ipv color. (color is Amerikaans) 
combinaties met and werken ook niet. Zou alleen red gebruiken. 

MVG
eggie

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-11-18 14:55:36+00:00): De paaltjes vastgemaakt
donux-nl (2025-11-18 15:05:21+00:00): De suggesties red, red/white, red and white werden door iDeditor gedaan. Ik heb er nu rood van gemaakt.
Bedankt voor het nakijken en aanpassen!
eggie (2025-11-18 15:12:07+00:00): Van die gecombineerde kleuren heb ik even geen idee. Een vraagje voor het forum in korte vragen korte antwoorden?
Bij red komt er een code te staan die werkt. Bij combinaties zie je dat niet.
eggie (2025-11-18 15:15:42+00:00): Volgens mij is dat pad langs de woningen geen footway maar een highway=path en mag je er dus ook fietsen. 
highway=path
surface=paving_stones
bicycle-yes en foot=yes
Er staat geen G7 bord
MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2025-11-17 19:59:35+00:00): Hi Antplanproje, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 98% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 6 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174788718
Antplanproje (2025-11-17 20:05:11+00:00): güzergah yanlış yerel kaynaktan güncel hali alınarak sisteme yüklenecek
bartgron (2025-11-26 20:51:36+00:00): Usunięto:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172011
yelisey90 (2025-11-18 09:01:06+00:00): Hi! Actually, this roads needs to stay "tertiary", as it's part of the sequence of roads connecting the village of Bevreti to the outer world. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Georgia#Categorization
yelisey90 (2025-11-18 09:02:33+00:00): "tertiary" or "unclassified", difficult to judge, which one.
LevanGo (2025-11-27 20:01:01+00:00): Hi. you're right. I think "tertiary" is more suitable.
Glassman (2025-11-18 21:42:29+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174789188
NeisBot (2025-11-17 20:21:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-17 20:21:41+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Furniture rental service in Freeport IL"
NeisReview (2025-11-19 09:18:40+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174849589
YomanNH (2025-12-15 12:05:13+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5092272 ? Mam wrażenie że nie ma tam tylu dróg.
Branko Kokanovic (2025-11-18 12:41:52+00:00): Mislim da ovde treba "place=hamlet"?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dhamlet
FiveWho (2025-11-18 19:42:39+00:00): Da, malo sam istražio oko tagovanja... ovde su posebne mahale iliti zaseoci onda bi trebalo da ide posebno za npr.:
- Čvor:
place=hamlet
name=Ćosinci
name:sr=Ћосинци
int_name=Cosinci

- Površinu:
landuse=residential
name=Ćosinci
name:sr=Ћосинци
int_name=Cosinci

Korigovaću ih, bilo bi dobro na gomili, ali u ID mi je pešački malo.

Hvala na komentaru.
Pozdrav
𒂼𒄄　 (2025-11-20 00:03:13+00:00): كفا تخريبا للخريطة، لاتضع نقاط لانك تريد ان تقول عيد ميلاد سعيد لحبيبتك!
HellMap (2025-12-04 00:17:04+00:00): Čau, tev šeit vairāki `maxspeed:type=LV:rual` gadījās.
Tigran Asaturjan (2025-12-04 00:25:14+00:00): Sveiks! Paldies, tūlīt pielabošu!
Syl (2025-11-18 13:28:39+00:00): Bonjour, le restaurant a l'air d'être en liquidation judiciaire : https://annuaire-entreprises.data.gouv.fr/annonces/814524476
Il était encore ouvert récemment ?

Et sinon, dans OSM les numéros de téléphones sont au format international avec +33 et pas de 0 au début.
Pistouf (2025-11-18 17:52:42+00:00): je n'avais aucune idée de si il est fermé actuellement, j'ai regardé des restaurants dans le coin via OSM et comme il n'y avait pas de lien direct vers les contacts, je me suis renseigné et ai mis ce que je trouvais en copié-collé. effectivement l'actu date de 2023 https://www.duminho.com/blog et leur facebook post de juillet c'est fermé : https://www.facebook.com/people/Restaurant-Du-Minho/100063756724532/
tu as l'oeil !!!
Syl (2025-11-18 18:36:14+00:00): Merci pour le lien vers Facebook qui confirme la fermeture, je viens modifier.

À la base je pensais juste ajouter le SIRET pour qu'il soit pris en compte par le site Complète Tes Commerces (https://complete-tes-commerces.fr/) et c'est là que je suis tombé sur l'info de la liquidation.

Bonne soirée.
Branko Kokanovic (2025-11-18 12:39:38+00:00): Zdravo, da li mozda koristis DINA sajt za dodavanje imena ulica? https://dina.openstreetmap.rs/st/index.html

Pitam jer si Jezdine na latinici napisao, a nemas ni "ref:RS:ulica" tag. Na DINA mozes da vidis tacno dokle ulica ide, i da kliknes "kopiraj" dugme da ti zapamti sve tagove. Pogledaj i pitaj sta treba, deluje da ce da te ubrza!
FiveWho (2025-11-18 19:36:53+00:00): Pozdrav, nisam koristio do sad, istražiću malo kako funkcioniše.
Može onda revert ove izmene.
Branko Kokanovic (2025-11-18 22:50:18+00:00): Ma kakav revert, evo ispravio sam malo. Izveštaj bude svako jutro, ali uhvati podatke samo do 21h, pa ovo što sam sad ispravio će biti tek preksutra. Interesantno je da su Jezdine i Ćuove zvanično zaseoci i obično su to u RGZ-u samo neki kvadratići, a ovde su baš prave ulice! Inače, imamo transparentnu podlogu koju možeš da uključiš u iD editoru da vidiš ulice i kućne brojeve - na prečicu "B" (pozadina), pa tamo pod "Poklapanja" treba da imaš "RGZ address and street open data overlay"
user_5359 (2025-11-18 08:18:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. 
If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org.
I assume this is the name of a business and not the name of the street section, correct?
mga_geo (2026-01-05 08:34:28+00:00): Bonjour,
Sur la relation route=bus 4037907, une des ways membres a le rôle "<".
Avec le schéma PTv2, les rôles des ways doivent être à "".
J'ai corrigé.
Marc
Yog Sot (2025-11-17 22:38:25+00:00): A tu się muszę niezgodzić. Rondo ma nazwę jako konkretny obszar
Owszem trawnik na środku to nie jest dokłądnie ten obszar, ale ta nazwa powinna byc prezentowana. 
To że nazwa jest wpisywana dla również jezdni, jest dodatkiem aby routingi się nie gubiły. Ale właśnie, to jest dodatek, a nazwa główna powinna być jak z parkami.
bartgron (2025-11-18 07:11:51+00:00): Ale nazwy nie mogą być w trawnikach, można ewentualnie dodać osobny punkt z nazwą i wtedy będzie widoczna, jak będę pamiętał to po powrocie do domu to dodam
Yog Sot (2025-11-18 19:21:41+00:00): no włąsnie, każde rondo ma uchwalona nazwę dla obszaru, a nie punktu. Owszem mało prawdopodobne, że akurat trawnik jest tym obszarem xD
Ale jest to jakies uproszczenie i lepiej pozwala wpisac nazwę w konkretny obszar niz gdyby to był punkt, jak proponujesz. 

No ale tak, opinie w społeczności jak zwykle bardzo podzielone. 
Tak czy siak, po prostu uważaj z tym edycjami czyszczącymi. Wiesz o co chodzi
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-24 14:12:11+00:00): This looks like it might be inside the fence on private property, is that correct?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174793353
Rwags (2025-12-03 21:58:42+00:00): It's right inside the fence looking down the road. Road T's there.
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-18 14:51:22+00:00): This camera appears to be in the trees with no street vantage based on how it lines up on Esri imagery.  What's the correct position?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174793442
notmyproblem1 (2025-11-17 22:07:16+00:00): Contattato utente, spiegato che prima c'è la footway poi la scalinata e non al contrario
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174386253
Glassman (2025-11-18 21:38:01+00:00): #TIP: A node with the same tag as the building isn't needed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174794284