piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Comino (2026-01-05 11:53:32+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes".

The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NOT accepted.
Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Cryptocurrencies_with_payment_tag and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:*#Cryptocurrencies

Please REMOVE the payment:cryptocurrencies=yes !

Thank you.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
descubrebitcoin (2026-01-05 17:37:25+00:00): I didn't add that tag. It was already there from previous edits!
Comino (2026-01-05 18:09:23+00:00): Oke, thanks for the response. I have fixed the issue(s).
Frans S (2026-02-11 11:40:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
However, don't connect nodes of your mappings to to other features like roads.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176814175
bxl-forever (2026-01-04 11:56:31+00:00): ## REVERTED CHANGESET

Only Bruxelles-Propreté/Net Brussels collects glass bottles.

One of the objects you changed here is an "Oxfam" container.  You changed "recycling:clothes" into "recycling:glass_bottles".  Sorry but Oxfam does not collect glass bottles, we don’t believe this edit can be true.

The name of the operator is shown on your screen when StreetComplete asks the question.  Please be more careful in the future.  Thanks.
kortgodt (2026-01-08 07:23:25+00:00): Tror du har brugt det forkerte tag her, da store dele af vejforløbet er tilgængeligt til fods, hele vejforløbet et tilgængeligt for taxi. Fra wikien på busway. "Busways are not meant to be used by motorists, pedestrians, or cyclists."
atcomapper (2026-01-08 07:57:49+00:00): Den del, der er tilgængelig for fodgængere, har jeg tagget med foot=yes :) Fra Østergade til Emil Vetts Passage er fodgængere ikke tilladt. Du har nok ret i, at der mangler et taxi=yes tag.
Jeg har i øvrigt forholdt mig til denne: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice#Deprecated:_highway=service_for_busways
atcomapper (2026-01-08 07:59:11+00:00): Nå nej, jeg har jo allerede sat psv=yes. Det inkluderer taxi.
kortgodt (2026-01-08 08:11:20+00:00): Du mangler også adgang for varelevering på dele af vejforløbet.
atcomapper (2026-01-08 08:17:27+00:00): Jeg har ikke set skiltning der tillader dette noget sted, men hvis du har anden information kan du jo bare opdatere det :)
kortgodt (2026-01-08 08:19:02+00:00): du har også fjernet fodgænger adgang fra Klostergade til Magasin.
atcomapper (2026-01-08 08:22:43+00:00): Det er nok nemmere, du selv lige opdaterer de enkelte strækninger, som du mener er forkerte :)
Lostmonkey (2026-01-08 08:34:58+00:00): Man må vel også godt cykle på Emil Vetts Passage det korte stykke fra Vestergade hen til cykelparkeringen på bagsiden af Magasins parkeringshus?
atcomapper (2026-01-08 08:45:18+00:00): Ikke umiddelbart nej, der er skiltet med cykler forbudt.
kortgodt (2026-01-08 10:04:54+00:00): Magasin har vareindlevering via Emil Vetts Passage.
Norbert Dichter (2026-01-04 11:36:12+00:00): Good question.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176814662
Self-Perfection (2026-04-15 02:28:53+00:00): Olá!

Tenho reparado que andas a adicionar muitos números de porta. Recomendo que experimentes a aplicação "Every Door". Podes instalá-la no telemóvel e é muito prático para adicionar moradas enquanto andas na rua.
lalolan (2026-04-28 18:04:37+00:00): Olá,
obrigado pela dica mas já a conhecia. Uso várias apps conforme a disponibilidade que tenho e o contexto. Muitas vezes tenho uns meros segundos para adicionar o número de porta enquanto ando e a melhor forma que conheço para isso é adicionar uma nota com um número, por exemplo no OsmAnd e depois importar tudo para o JOSM e editar com calma.

Não recomendo a ninguém fazer isto. Já dei um valente tombo ao usar esta técnica, mas parte da culpa também foi de quem instalou um ferro na horizontal que mal se vê a meio de um caminho pedonal!
felipeeugenio (2026-01-04 11:46:22+00:00): Note	Contributor	Tmstmp UTC	Action	Comment
5115990 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2026-01-04 12:44	closed	ok..
5116051 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2026-01-04 12:44	closed	ok..
5115957 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2026-01-04 12:44	closed	ok..
5115985 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2026-01-04 12:44	closed	ok..
5116046 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2026-01-04 12:44	closed	ok..
5116064 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2026-01-04 12:44	closed	ok..
5115955 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2026-01-04 12:44	closed	ok..
5116016 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2026-01-04 12:44	closed	ok..
5116067 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2026-01-04 12:44	closed	ok..
5115973 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2026-01-04 12:44	closed	ok..
5116250 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2026-01-04 12:44	closed	ok
5115963 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2026-01-04 12:44	closed	ok..
5115943 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2026-01-04 12:44	closed	ok..
5116065 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2026-01-04 12:44	closed	ok..
5115971 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2026-01-04 12:44	closed	ok..
5116032 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2026-01-04 12:44	closed	ok..
5115994 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2026-01-04 12:44	closed	ok..
5116055 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2026-01-04 12:44	closed	ok..
5116050 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2026-01-04 12:44	closed	ok..
5116053 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2026-01-04 12:44	closed	ok..
5115926 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2026-01-04 12:44	closed	ok..
5116048 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2026-01-04 12:44	closed	ok..
5116043 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2026-01-04 12:44	closed	ok..
5115972 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2026-01-04 12:44	closed	ok..
Ltrlg (2026-01-05 18:48:30+00:00): Ce conteneur empiète-t-il réellement sur la place de parking ?
Comino (2026-01-05 11:54:04+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes".

The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NOT accepted.
Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Cryptocurrencies_with_payment_tag and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:*#Cryptocurrencies

Please REMOVE the payment:cryptocurrencies=yes !

Thank you.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
descubrebitcoin (2026-01-05 17:41:43+00:00): I didn't add that tag. It was already there from previous edits!
Comino (2026-01-05 18:10:29+00:00): Oke, thanks for the response. I have fixed the issue(s).
Comino (2026-01-05 11:54:16+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes".

The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NOT accepted.
Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Cryptocurrencies_with_payment_tag and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:*#Cryptocurrencies

Please REMOVE the payment:cryptocurrencies=yes !

Thank you.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
descubrebitcoin (2026-01-05 17:40:29+00:00): I didn't add that tag. It was already there from previous edits!
Comino (2026-01-05 18:10:21+00:00): Oke, thanks for the response. I have fixed the issue(s).
stosh77 (2026-01-06 03:53:00+00:00): Revised.
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-07 22:42:41+00:00): Что это?
Comino (2026-01-05 11:53:45+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes".

The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NOT accepted.
Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Cryptocurrencies_with_payment_tag and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:*#Cryptocurrencies

Please REMOVE the payment:cryptocurrencies=yes !

Thank you.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
descubrebitcoin (2026-01-05 17:39:10+00:00): I didn't add that tag. It was already there from previous edits!
Comino (2026-01-05 18:10:11+00:00): Oke, thanks for the response. I have fixed the issue(s).
Lezurex (2026-01-04 14:14:43+00:00): Hallo stillhart,

Bitte Q drücken nicht vergessen, damits rechtwinklig wird.
stillhart (2026-01-04 16:51:20+00:00): Muss man das bzw bringt das was? Ich mappe ja nach Luftbild?
UT93 (2026-01-04 22:22:16+00:00): Ich denke, das muss man nicht zwingend. Vielleicht sollte man aber die einzelnen Stellplätze innerhalb des Parkplatzes anordnen...
Lezurex (2026-01-05 07:49:22+00:00): Zwingend nein, aber es wäre schöner. Parkplätze sind (mit wenigen Ausnahmen) in der Regel rechtwinklig angeordnet. Es wäre schön, wenn sie dann auch auf der Karte wirklich rechtwinklig wären.

Und ja, aus Rücksicht auf andere Mapper, die hier nach dir Änderungen machen, wäre es ganz nett, wenn du auch umliegende Dinge wie den bereits eingezeichneten Parkplatz miteinbeziehen würdest. Aktuell überlappen die Parkfelder den Umriss des Parkplatzes.

Um Parkplatzfelder in JOSM effizient zu mappen, kann ich dir übrigens noch das Gridify Plugin empfehlen.
ratrun (2026-01-05 03:43:36+00:00): Hello,

the new road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1464116090 currently looks unrealistic. It is not connected to the rest of the road network in the north and you didn't consider existing crossing ways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1047395508#map=18/46.259371/9.396183 for example. Pleases rework and improve this edit!
Thank you!
Eros93 (2026-01-05 07:35:01+00:00): In the reality the road is connected through a roundabout in the North. I had to understand how to modify via Trivulzia and via Europa. They are part of a path. I had to cut that road to add the roundabot: how can i do that?
The same problem on the old road via dell'agricoltura. For the most part it runs on a new track on the east side of the new sp2 var. But I have to cut it bucause at North and at South is in part on the west side. Problem this road is part of the path ciclabile valchiavenna. So I can't cut it.
Also as I saw it was a wrong information because I saw people walking on the embankment: so the correct path of ciclabile valchiavenna is the existing track, the nearest to the Mera. I also saw the north access and it is the only possible way it can be. You can check the gpx file to see that i traveled the new sp2 var. Can you help me? If you can at least help me to understand how I can modify the two path I would be grateful.
ratrun (2026-01-05 07:59:22+00:00): I would like to support you and give you instructions, but I do not have any experience with the ID editor. I do all my editing in JOSM. It is more intuitive and faster for me.
You are talking about a GPX file, can you point me to it? What mode of transport did you use to create it? Via car? Via bicycle? What does it contain? Only the new road or also existing ones? I would like to have a look at the GPX to decide how I can support you best. Maybe we should ask in the Italian Forum, I'm sure you will get better help there.
ratrun (2026-01-05 08:21:36+00:00): I just found your GPX file here https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Eros93/traces.

Unfortunately in the north the new roundabout is not contained.

I suggest that you improve the connectivity as far a you can. I will care about the route relation afterwards from remote. I think you are talking about this relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3876395#map=13/46.26564/9.40838

Right?

Shall this route relation new run along the new road?
ratrun (2026-01-05 08:23:02+00:00): Edit: Sorry, I meant: Shall this route relation now run along the new road?
Eros93 (2026-01-05 14:17:49+00:00): I'm a begineer so I haven't learned jsom yet. Also I'm not familiar with forum or "support chat".

Unfortunately I only have that gpx file. I recorded it via car, now I can't go to this place to record further tracks, but as soon as possible I want to go there by bike. The track only contains the new car road.

On the north the new roundabot is contained partially. I didn't remember to have a full loop around. But the track contains it, and via Italia is now straight and goes into the roundabot. The older intersection no longer exists.

Yes, you found the correct relation. I think that it shoud stay on the old road. The new road have another number (SP2 Var) on the road signs. So until the Provincia doesn't change something the new road isn't part of this relation.
The problem is that I can't cut the old road to insert the roudabot... I'm afraid to break something bigger.

For the same reason I didn't correct via dell'Agricoltura. It is part of Ciclabile Valchiavenna https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6588150#map=14/46.18402/9.43820&layers=G
I'm pretty sure that now it isn't. This path (ciclabile valchiavenna) runs on the track that runs next to it on the west side. There's no any road between the new SP2 Var and the track on the river bank.
Via dell'agricoltura now runs on a new route on the east side of the SP2 Var.

Thank you for your help. I hope I wrote in an understandable way.
ratrun (2026-01-05 15:19:57+00:00): Thank you for your elaborate answer. I tried to guess what you intended in the north in a small changeset. Could you please check the new data which I created in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1464378117#map=19/46.263592/9.391992. 
Here I created the new roundabout and put it into the road relation.

I intentionally didn't touch https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293960024#map=19/46.263594/9.391995 yet as I cannot guess from remote how the real connectivity situation is now.
Eros93 (2026-01-05 15:37:48+00:00): Yes, it is correct. Whith future gpx tracks I'll check precisely via Italia.

way/293960024#map=19/46.263594/9.391995 this road now runs next to the new road sp2 var on the east side. It is the new via dell'Agricoltura. But they changed a bit the intersection.
Eros93 (2026-01-08 23:07:46+00:00): I'm impatient so I had another drive (waiting for a bike survey). Now I have new informations and a new gpx. So i made a new edit. Maybe you can help me again. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177003407
bartgron (2026-01-04 21:00:58+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176835860#map=16/49.41601/20.90500
Zamiast orczyka został usunięty spory fragment lasu
Superadlen (2026-01-10 09:16:07+00:00): merci
Comino (2026-01-05 11:53:56+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes".

The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NOT accepted.
Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Cryptocurrencies_with_payment_tag and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:*#Cryptocurrencies

Please REMOVE the payment:cryptocurrencies=yes !

Thank you.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
descubrebitcoin (2026-01-05 17:39:49+00:00): I didn't add that tag. It was already there from previous edits!
Comino (2026-01-05 18:10:02+00:00): Oke, thanks for the response. I have fixed the issue(s).
Udarian (2026-01-04 14:58:52+00:00): can you please check if it has a ref again, all of the MDT bus stop signs I have seen have a ref number and QR code. I have attached an example image below showing what they look like below 
https://api.panoramax.xyz/?focus=pic&map=20.63/25.6798389/-80.3681972&pic=11dc3e52-81cc-45c8-a4d5-a2fa58139236&speed=250&xyz=355.69/10.26/7

happy mapping,
Udar
Beto Dealmeida (2026-01-04 16:55:58+00:00): Udar, I did some research and the route that served Harbor Drive no longer exists: https://www.islandernews.com/news/keybiscayne/bus-that-connects-key-biscayne-with-miami-changes-its-name-and-route/article_46209f40-2702-11ee-a793-4f6a332c4d7e.html

> Due to the low number of passengers that were transported on one of the entrance routes to the island, the county will suspend the Harbor Drive route and maintains the Crandon Blvd.

I walk there every morning, and there are no more bus stops along Harbor Drive.
Udarian (2026-01-04 17:03:47+00:00): then the stops should be tagged as was:highway=bus_stop , If you want I can do that

Happy Mapping,
Udar.
Beto Dealmeida (2026-01-06 19:57:31+00:00): Oh, please do it then -- I don't know how to do that. I've only been using the StreetComplete app.
Udarian (2026-01-07 04:36:12+00:00): I made that change, if you want to see what it looks like you can look at it at https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176927813

if you have any feedback feel free to respond ask here.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
eggie (2026-01-04 13:33:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
astazou (2026-01-04 12:59:36+00:00): #completetescommerces
eggie (2026-01-04 13:35:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Sylabowy Kot (2026-03-05 21:18:33+00:00): Miło ze strony EveryDoora, że kasuje węzeł starego najemcy, psując historię wstawiając nowego. Ale to jest niesprzężone pomimo pogrupowania wielu zmian w jeden changeset.
Rogoyski (2026-03-06 03:17:33+00:00): Nie wiem, do czego się właściwie odnosisz. EveryDoor nie kasuje starego węzła. Jeśli chodzi o kawiarnię Reduta, to prawdopodobnie powziąłem wątpliwość, czy ona w ogóle tam była, bo byłoby to bardzo szybkie przejęcie lokalu jak na standardy wynajmu od publicznego właściciela, i dlatego skasowałem.
Frans S (2026-02-04 14:09:29+00:00): Hello. thanks for mapping.
Are you aware that you duplicated 112 buildings in this area ? Mainly task 553 and 1551
I removed the duplicated ones.
Never considered changing to JOSM ?
Given the quantity of mappings you deliver, it might be worth it to change.
best regards
Yog Sot (2026-01-04 20:30:11+00:00): czyli przejść też przypadkiem nie wolno? ;]
gdzie tabliczki zakazujące wstępu? ;)
azalizh (2026-01-04 22:38:11+00:00): Przechodzić wolno. Chodziło o to że wcześniej było jako parking_aisle.
azalizh (2026-01-05 09:53:24+00:00): @Yog Sot - Dziękuję za poprawienie.
Taya_S (2026-01-05 09:08:53+00:00): Reverted unexplained deletions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176851414
NeisBot (2026-01-04 13:46:13+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 365 of your last 388 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23672011
Taya_S (2026-01-05 09:08:54+00:00): Reverted unexplained deletions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176851414
atshe resu (2026-01-05 04:57:27+00:00): Satellite images of military through Mapbox Satellite show buildings and roads being demolished without a trace, so I deleted them and it's not a mistake.
atshe resu (2026-01-05 04:57:55+00:00): It was reported that the unit was disbanded around 2018.
Hopla57 (2026-01-07 10:51:21+00:00): Hello,

Concernant le restaurant Le Frenchouillard (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13430453944) :
  - l'adresse est déjà indiquée dans OSM, il n'est pas utile de la doublonner sur le POI (sûrement un paramétrage de Every Door) ;
  - tu as indiqué `level=2` ce qui sous-entend que le restaurant n'est présent qu'au 2e étage, est-ce le cas ?

À+
KotKotKat (2026-01-27 16:24:23+00:00): Bonjour,

Côté adresse, je crois que c'est un bug de EveryDoor. Je vais surveiller pour voir le problème. 
Côté étage, c'était effectivement une erreur. Je porte le blâme sur le fait qu'il faisait froid le jour présent !

Bonne soirée!
jbcharron (2026-01-04 14:37:15+00:00): Bonjour,
Je me permet de vous contacter, on en avait discuté il y a quelques mois sur un de vos précédemment changement de plutôt utiliser pour les adresses le préfixe contact: au lieu d'addr dans Everydoor via un paramètre a activer dans l'application. Car de nombreux commerces ont déja le numéro et la voie de renseigné avec le tag contact:housenumber et contact:street à Metz, donc vous rajouter des informations qui sont déja présentes et qui font doublons sur les commerces.
Merci d'avance
Jean-Baptiste
KotKotKat (2026-01-27 16:21:29+00:00): Houla! Je n'avais pas vu du tout votre message. Et, oui, je me souviens bien de ce dont vous parler. J'avais changé l'option dans mon application specifiquement pour utiliser le préfixe contact, et... l'option est toujours activée. Donc, je ne sais pas pourquoi cela n'a pas marché. 

Je vais retester la prochaine fois que je suis en ville! 

Bonne soirée!
Comino (2026-01-05 11:53:16+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes".

The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NOT accepted.
Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Cryptocurrencies_with_payment_tag and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:*#Cryptocurrencies

Please REMOVE the payment:cryptocurrencies=yes !

Thank you.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
descubrebitcoin (2026-01-05 17:38:16+00:00): I didn't add that tag. It was already there from previous edits!
Comino (2026-01-05 18:09:35+00:00): Oke, thanks for the response. I have fixed the issue(s).
rempshaener (2026-01-04 18:14:38+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Wenn keine Fahrbahnmarkierungen mehr sichtbar sind, wäre ein lane_markings=no ausreichend.
Das lanes=2 widerspricht den anderen Angaben etwas: lane_markings=no in Kombination mit zwei Fahrspuren passt nicht richtig. D. h. bei lane_markings=no fährt man gut damit, auf eine lanes-Angabe zu verzichten.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
Corneel Van der Cruyssen_ (2026-01-04 14:53:30+00:00): Normal Opening Hours on website are incorrect. Shop is 7/7 7-20 open and till 21 on Friday. They announced this in October: https://www.facebook.com/61558157962624/posts/pfbid0GqPPKJf7byzrzqSvAxmFWwYZjbqm1yyLk7bbYbaHyXUDicb77gUUkeapqRb9W5PLl/
Langlaeufer (2026-01-06 08:46:01+00:00): Hallo Groot,
bist du dir sicher? Es gibt dort einen geplasterten Radweg vielleicht hast du den für den Geweg gehalten? Oder wurde der andere Weg kürzlich gepflastert?
Langlaeufer (2026-01-06 08:48:21+00:00): ne, sorry, kein Radweg, aber da ist noch ein nicht separater Fußweg (sidewalk:both) den du vermutlich meinst.
01Groot (2026-01-06 10:46:23+00:00): Moin, was ist denn richtig? Muss noch etwas geändert werden? Der Weg besteht aus einem Teil Schotter und ein Teil gepflasterten Weg.
Langlaeufer (2026-01-06 13:18:53+00:00): ich habe den separaten Weg jetzt als verdichteten (compacted) Mehrzweckweg (path) erfasst.
Der gepflasterten Fußweg direkt an an der Straße ist an der Straßenachse mit (sidewalk=both, sidewalk:both:surface=paving_stones) erfasst. Wenn du der Meinung bist, das dies so mit der Realität übereinstimmt wäre nichts mehr zu korrigieren.
Taya_S (2026-01-05 09:08:55+00:00): Reverted unexplained deletions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176851414
flohoff (2026-01-04 23:59:17+00:00): Nur weil du hier ohne not alle paths zu footways machst. 

Du kennst den Diskussionsstand das path das alles ersetzen soll?

Flo
stirps (2026-01-05 03:19:25+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, war mir noch nicht bekannt. Soll das jetzt irgendwie eine große Migration werden? Hättest du vielleicht einen Link? Das einzige was ich jetzt gerade auf die Schnelle gefunden habe ist ungefähr aus 2009.