piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Ewen Hill (2024-03-10 21:45:23+00:00): Hi Tom, that is excellent and detailed work on all your latest edits! Chapeau
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148450219
Tomaussie_17 (2024-03-11 06:55:04+00:00): Thank you very much!
Marek-M (2024-06-24 18:08:26+00:00): Cześć,
W tej edycji utworzyłeś drogę https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1259598267, która duplikuje istniejącą wcześniej drogę https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190527973 - koniecznie trzeba to naprawić. W związku z tym, że każda z tych dróg ma nieco różne tagowanie, to warto byłoby prawidłowe tagi przerzucić na starszą drogę w OSM, czyli https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190527973

Wizualizacja duplikatu: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Nil
Marek-M (2024-06-25 09:01:29+00:00): Zrobiłem poprawkę tego błędu w edycji https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153146779
Syl (2024-04-28 12:54:48+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai remis le nom visible sur place (Village de Pont-Lagot) comme nom et j'ai mis Pont-Lagot comme nom officiel .
Merci de ne plus remettre Pont-Lagot comme nom, dans OSM c'est le terrain qui prime.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-21 06:08:30+00:00): Note that images uploaded by mappers and hosted at westnordost.de server contain photos taken for OSM notes. But this images are not kept permanently, so adding it for example to image=* is not useful. Upload your photos to Wikimedia Commons if you want to keep them - note that uploading photos made by someone else needs a license assignment.

See also https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/9302 and https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/22397
silversurfer83 (2024-03-10 10:46:23+00:00): Moin crisb :)

was genau soll uns denn der Name des Teichs sagen? Liegt die Wasseroberfläche ungefähr auf dieser Höhe üNN? Dann bitte folgenden tag verwenden:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele

Und ein weiterer Tip zum Vereinsheim: Wenn dies der Sitz des Vereins ist, dann ist es besser einen Punkt (node) im Gebäude zu erzeugen und diesen mit dieser Haupteigenschaft und den weiteren Infos, sofern bekannt, zu versorgen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:club

bei Fragen immer raus damit und weiter viel Spaß an der Karte
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148451363
crisb (2024-03-10 10:55:48+00:00): Hallo silversurfer83,

ich arbeite jetzt schon einige Jahre hier mit und habe viele Stunden in dieses Projekt investiert. Wenn ich mich jetzt für jede Änderung rechtfertigen muss, die ich einfüge, dann werde ich mich in Zukunft ausklinken. Das geht mir schon in anderen Bereichen tierisch auf den Keks.

Bei der Namensgebung war der Angelverein halt etwas unkreativ. Gern kannst du dir den See auf der Homepage des Vereins ansehen: https://www.hoehe500.de/

Viele Grüße
crisb
silversurfer83 (2024-03-10 11:16:15+00:00): danke für die schnelle Antwort :)

Du sollst dich keineswegs rechtfertigen. Ich habe nur einen gewissen Umkreis um meinen Schaffensschwerpunkt ein wenig im Blick und der Name war für einen Teich ein wenig außer der Reihe, weshalb ich lieber erstmal nachfrage. Das reine Alter eines Accounts hat sich nämlich bisher nicht als hilfreiche Metrik herausgestellt.
Der Node für den Verein sieht wesentlich aussagekräftiger aus als der reine Name am Gebäude. Danke.
Wünsche allen Angler*innen stets Petri Heil und dir die nötige Gelassenheit in einem kollaborativen Projekt wie diesem hier mit der nötigen Kommunikation entspannt umzugehen.

Einen schönen Sonntag wünscht
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148451363
Yunan973 (2024-07-23 18:29:56+00:00): Bonjour,

es tu sûr qu'il y a le courrier cauchois ici ?
je ne vois rien sur les images de rues et l'adresse sur leur site Internet n'est pas ici mais rue Edmond Labbé (j'ai d'ailleurs déplacé le siret sur cet autre bâtiment, du fait de la correspondance de l'adresse).

Cordialement

Cordialement
Kurosawa06 (2024-07-23 19:49:07+00:00): Bonjour,
Dans le journal, je crois que j'avais vu cette adresse.
Et je crois avoir une sorte de panneau publicitaire provisoire à cet endroit il y a quelques temps.

Je vais revérifier quand j'aurais accès à ce journal.
Kurosawa06 (2024-07-23 20:07:50+00:00): Il s'agit peut-être de la régie publicitaire du journal ou d'une partie de la rédaction.
Kurosawa06 (2024-07-23 20:10:03+00:00): Voilà, cette adresse au 9 avenue Foch était provisoire :
https://www.lecourriercauchois.fr/actualite-336740-yvetot-le-courrier-cauchois-vous-accueille-au-9-avenue-marechal-foch

On peut supprimer ce point alors. Après je peux toujours vérifier si ce journal est encore ici.
Yunan973 (2024-07-27 16:12:02+00:00): Bravo pour tes recherches.
Oui, il faudrait être sûr avant de le supprimer (en attendant j'ai rajouté 2 attributs pour mieux expliciter ce point).
Je te laisse gérer la suite quand tu auras le temps.
Cordialement
Kurosawa06 (2024-07-27 19:21:30+00:00): Merci beaucoup. Je vais y passer prochainement.
Frans S (2024-03-26 12:20:31+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
One of the validator jobs is to reviews the taggings of highways .  Experience earns that traces of highways are regularly wrong tagged.

How to decide when a trace is a path or an unclassified highway (main choices in rural areas)
First, look what they connect.  Houses, settlements, villages. Then measure the width of that trace.

In iDeditor 

Shortcut : Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle  opens measurement panel
Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.
If a trace is max 2 meters wide, tag it as a path.
Wider and connect hamlets, houses and villages should be tagged as unclassified.
Tag residential in urban areas (villages, towns)

In JOSM, use the measure tab or, draw a circle (round building, shortcut Alt-Z when the building plugin is installed)) between the shoulders of a trace and read the distance on the lower toolbar. (don't map that bulding)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
This is mentioned about tracks on the
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routing#Routing_considerations

Quote: Tracks are roads of agricultural purpose. They usually connect fields to farms. The surface sometimes makes them inaccessible for regular cars, or at least limits the speeds to a very slow pace. Tracks should always be avoided for through-going traffic or within urban areas.

Best regards
Pikse (2024-04-20 12:57:13+00:00): This "Maasikad Viljandis" is rather merely a descrption used in particular source, not a name of individual sculptures. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only. This is also why I corrected previous name="Kondas-Strawberry" for individual sculptures to description="Betoonist maasikas" (see https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/2147829408).

Also, I believe this relation is redundant as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations_are_not_categories. Its transportation related site=stop_area in particular makes little sense.
enedaniel (2024-04-24 11:42:13+00:00): The “name” of these objects in Viljandi corresponds to the following source:
https://www.puhkaeestis.ee/et/maasikad-viljandis

If you know a better name for it, feel free to change it!

In my opinion, the “relation” makes sense because the objects are related to each other and are therefore easier to find in the city of Viljandi, which is the purpose of a map (OSM). Please refer:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:site

The data tag Site=stop_area is of course wrong, I'll correct it. Thank you
Pikse (2024-04-24 12:58:38+00:00): My point is that sometimes an object does't have a name, and therefore does not need a "name" tag ("Name is the name only"). If an object only goes by some incidental description, then description=* tag can be used instead. In this case it's diffucult to regard "Maasikad Viljandis" as a name, especially if this plural form description is used for an individual sculpture the way it's done here.

As I understand, the idea of site relations is to "group several objects which together have a single identity", and not just group objects that are somehow related or similar. A site relation may group objects that make up an individual bus station, or individual historic site, or alike. I admit you may argue that these sculptures as artworks may somehow make up a group with single identity. But to me it seems more straightforw to compare this group with a category (like a set of lampposts in a city, or a set of bus stops in a county).
AndersAndersson (2024-03-10 17:41:54+00:00): Hej!
En eller flera noder verkar ha blivit dragna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1138099472#map=19/61.04462/15.80426
Frans S (2024-03-10 11:09:08+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared. ( Don't you use the building plugin?)


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148452560
Jinoytommanjaly (2024-03-10 11:34:23+00:00): Thank Frans for your feedback. Will go through the document and will update it accordingly.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148452560
JassKurn (2024-03-10 23:43:36+00:00): Hi Alwyn,

In this changeset your adding a Hiking Route, part of a "super relation". The name overall name "LGa Land's End to Exeter", is not a name I recognise, or find on websites recording UK trails.

I assuming that your mapping a "Land's End to John O'Groats" hiking route? Commonly known as LEJog. 

If so I believe it can't be in OSM. My knowledge of this famous hike or cycle, is that there is no official or recognised, defined route on the ground. 

A search on the UK "Long Distance Walkers Association" website confirms this.

https://ldwa.org.uk/ldp/members/show_path.php?path_name=Land%27s+End+to+John+o%27+Groats

Assuming I'm correct and your mapping this LEJoG can you provide the source and how it can be verified

Thanks, Jass
AlwynWellington (2024-03-11 19:40:50+00:00): Jass, thank you for your thoughtful and considered comments.

I have walked many routes in Scotland, England and several other European countries, and contributed to OSM many details from those experiences.

Two years ago I looked at the LEjog gpx files and the resulting route.  As I recall made considerable use of Public Footpaths in England: from a practical viewpoint (mine and others) the Public Footpaths are not realistic for long distance walking.

A long distance walk that has been in my sights for many years has been my version of a Lands End to John O'Groats: my version would connect almost all of my family connections.

A very large part of my route would include existing routes north from from Bristol, with only three in Scotland, for my way to achieve John O'Groats.

In Cornwall and Devon I first considered using the south west coastal path route and added accordingly some year ago.

Last October I spent a week in Cornwall, Devon and Somerset looking at walkable long distance possibilities towards Bristol.

Last week I deleted my earlier efforts using SWCP and made a route through to Exeter for my personal use.

Having obtained the resulting GPX files I have now deleted all of the LGa route details. 

I am aware of the need to map routes that have been reliably published and verified and believe I have complied in other cases.

I hope my explanation fully answers your questions on this matter.

As you appear to have some oversight of walking routes, I have some observations about details for a well established route around London that I walked in October.

These are of a generic nature, using that routes details as an example.

Please advise if I can discuss the generic aspects with you.

Alwyn
Frans S (2024-03-10 16:28:05+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
About tagging roads. Please check the African highway tag wiki.
The roads here are not to be mapped as tracks because they provide access to and connect buildings /settlements.
Best regards
RicoElectrico (2024-04-01 23:55:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4175735
RicoElectrico (2024-04-01 23:56:04+00:00): Chyba zabrakło samego oznaczenia przystanku z nazwą (railway=halt).
LockOnGuy (2024-03-10 13:48:08+00:00): Hello little_maper,       
       
Yesterday, I edited this street to make it suitable, matching the way it is on the ground. Unfortunately, today you reverted my edit and made it incorrect again.       
       
The cars going southbound on Damascus Street merge with the cars from the Alawi bridge, and both merge into one street before splitting again into a tunnel and a surface-level street that leads into an intersection. Therefore, splitting the roads the way you did here with a link in the middle is incorrect, as it involves two streets merging into one and then splitting again into two again. The cars, for example, going down from the bridge smoothly proceed to the intersection without changing streets with a link or something.       
       
Could you please take another look and perhaps edit this changeset?       
       
Regards.
little_maper (2024-03-11 09:06:22+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy;
Thank you for reaching out.
I agree with you and in my opinion, we can split part of Damascus Street from the Alawi Bridge and part of Damascus Street into a tunnel
and make them on the surface-level street but not at the same point
If you agree with my point I will update them.
Check this link to show what I mean.
https://ibb.co/v1Pj7zr
Regards
little_maper
LockOnGuy (2024-03-11 11:48:00+00:00): I can't agree with the way it's presented in the screenshot unfortunately, mostly for the safety reason, as someone stranger might think there is a turn right at the end of the bridge and he will slow down and break then maybe someone might hit him from the back because no one slow down here.      
If the way it was before not the best way, how about this?        
https://i.ibb.co/7JyHRfZ/image.png            
Regards.
little_maper (2024-03-11 12:53:33+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy;
I totally agree with you,
Can you fix it, please?
Regards
little_maper
LockOnGuy (2024-03-15 01:14:16+00:00): Sorry for taking so long, I was extremely busy, I updated the shape in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148667407 . let me know if you have any feedback dear friend. Thanks and keep up the good work.
little_maper (2024-03-17 07:03:06+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy;
Thank you for your edits.
Regards
little_maper
Ewen Hill (2024-03-10 21:44:10+00:00): Hi - Re your request for a review. This looks excellent although you could have kept the gauge potentially/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148453112
ToniE (2024-03-10 09:38:10+00:00): ... Robert-Bosch-Straße ...
ToniE (2024-03-10 09:38:16+00:00): ... Robert-Bosch-Straße ...
LockOnGuy (2024-03-11 22:38:42+00:00): Please save edits in one area and upload them before changing something in another part of Iraq.
silversurfer83 (2024-03-10 10:42:22+00:00): Gude Wolfgang :)

ein kleiner Hinweis zu Objekten (wie POIs), die sich ändern (geplant werden, demnächst öffnen, geschlossen haben, restlos entfernt werden,...):
Du hast hier an der Bäckerei nur den Namen und die Öffnungszeiten entfernt. Die Haupteigenschaft "shop=bakery" hast du aber unverändert gelassen. Für Die Karte bedeutet das, dass dort eine Bäckerei ist an der so Informationen wie Öffnungszeiten und Name halt noch fehlen.
Ich habe das mal angepasst:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4210249189
Dafür habe ich die sogenannten lifecycle prefixes genutzt. Details dazu auch im Wiki unter
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix

weil

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Bei Fragen immer raus damit und weiter viel Spaß an der Karte
silversurfer83
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148454703
woodpeck (2024-03-10 18:32:39+00:00): There needs to be a verifiable source that this refinery is called "Vecchia Raffineria" in Italian, otherwise your name:it is just a translation and needs to go.
Lex legis (2024-03-10 18:36:59+00:00): Listen, is a description that no one see public. If you want to continue to reply me for each post I put here, go ahead, if you don't like remove my edits. So it needs to go if you are happy. Have a nice evening
Lex legis (2024-03-10 18:45:15+00:00): BTW, what the source for "Old Refinery" in English (is not the official language of Mauritania)? "is just a translation" and needs to go
DD1GJ (2024-03-10 15:48:26+00:00): Revert, Wegstück war bereits vorhanden.
woodpeck (2024-03-10 18:31:14+00:00): Please provide a source for this pitch in Mauritania actually bearing the Italian name "campo sportivo". As you know, name tags are not indended for descriptions - the "leisure=pitch" already gives everyone the information they need. Do you really think it would be good to have name:xx tags for 200+ languages on this, all explaining that it is a pitch?
maraf24 (2024-03-11 12:57:44+00:00): Tag addr:full byłby lepszy dla takiego opisowego adresu.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:*#Commonly_used_subkeys
Frans S (2024-03-21 17:15:59+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark about mapping highways
How to decide when a trace is a path or an unclassified highway
First, look what they connect.  Houses, settlements, villages. Then measure the width of that trace.
In iDeditor 

Shortcut : Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle  opens measurement panel
Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.
If a trace is max 2 meters wide, tag it as a path.
Wider and connect hamlets, houses and villages should be tagged as unclassified.
Tag residential in urban areas (villages, towns)
In JOSM, use the measure tab, or draw a circle (round building, shortcut Alt-Z when the building plugin is installed)) between the shoulders of a trace and read the distance on the lower toolbar. (remove the circle after that)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
This is mentioned about tracks on the
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routing#Routing_considerations

Quote: Tracks are roads of agricultural purpose. They usually connect fields to farms. The surface sometimes makes them inaccessible for regular cars, or at least limits the speeds to a very slow pace. Tracks should always be avoided for through-going traffic or within urban areas.
Stone_X (2024-03-10 18:52:07+00:00): Dla dróg które zostały oznaczone znakiem B-9 (zakaz wjazdu rowerów) nie stosujemy tagu: bicycle=use_sidepath tylko bicycle=no.
Hanys1871 (2024-03-12 10:28:59+00:00): Nie zauważyłem tego znaku w tamtym miejscu, gdy byłem tam ostatnio. Jeśli rzeczywiście jest tam B-9, to jak najbardziej proszę poprawić mój błąd. W najbliższym czasie gdy będę tamtędy przejeżdżał sam to sprawdzę jeszcze raz.
Stone_X (2024-03-12 21:00:15+00:00): Tak, zostały tam wprowadzone ograniczenia w poruszaniu się dla pieszych i rowerzystów. Przekierowano cały taki ruch na pobliski tunel pieszo-rowerowy.
https://postimg.cc/Mvp616wP
https://postimg.cc/YjkqqNsw
https://postimg.cc/mhwZccv1
muphin (2024-03-10 13:25:15+00:00): Hij komt weer terug, zie 
https://www.wshd.nl/renovatie-rijswaardsebrug-in-hellevoetsluis
eggie (2024-03-10 14:09:30+00:00): Het is probleem is nu wel dat drie routerelaties zijn onderbroken. Daar heb ik een fixme =incomplete op gezet.

groet
eggie
eggie (2024-03-10 14:15:19+00:00): De tagging die er op oorspronkelijk ophoort.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148456087
eggie (2024-03-10 14:31:04+00:00): Voor die periode kunnen er misschien beter conditional tags op met het tijdvak. Het is al weer zo april?
eggie (2024-03-10 14:57:58+00:00): De routes zijn al omgelegd zie ik.
Die zullen tzt weer teruggelegd worden.
NeisBot (2024-03-24 12:40:41+00:00): Hello いjhdいjhd, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments \n
Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-10 11:10:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1259653651

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-10 11:10:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2183526053
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316049819

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-03-10 11:35:49+00:00): Hi I merged your info wth the present addressnode.
gr eggie
nurdafur (2024-03-11 16:18:53+00:00): Hallo Hugskili
Du hast hier ein Stück der Grüzenstrasse gelöscht, weil da jetzt eine Baustelle ist und deshalb da nicht durchgefahren werden kann. 
In einem solchen Fall gibt es zwei bessere Möglichkeiten, wie das darzustellen ist:
1. highway=construction und construction=residential
2. access:conditional=no@ (und dann die Zeitperiode, für die das gilt) 
Ich glaube ich habe gelesen, bis August.
Die erste Variante ist einfacher, aber es darf dann nicht vergessen werden, die Tags wieder zu ändern, wenn die Baustelle vorbei ist.
Liebe Grüsse 
Urs
Bexhill-OSM (2025-08-11 01:32:01+00:00): Hey Thingummy, the lighthouse base has been completely removed now. What's the best course of action, delete the whole way?
Alex
Thingummy (2025-08-16 15:59:28+00:00): Quite right thanks for letting me know. I don't currently know the exact location of the buoys which replace the lighthouse, or the Royal Sovereign Shoals themselves. If you know  where they are relative to the lighthouse feel free to amend, or let me know, If not I will get round to fixing it when I can find out.
watmildon (2024-03-25 02:39:52+00:00): Hello! The road classification here looks somewhat odd to me. There's more things marked as service+drive way than I'd expect. There's also a lot of things marked as surface=gravel that don't really look like it from the aerial? Is this from a survey?

Here's a good example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20765680/history
BCNorwich (2024-03-11 08:11:54+00:00): Retagged construction area
eggie (2024-03-10 14:20:24+00:00): Dag Niels   
Die aparte velden zijn prima. 
'k Denk wel beter geen adresnodes verwijderen. 
Ik heb 'm teruggeplaatst.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-03-10 14:22:12+00:00): leisure=sports_centre toegevoegd op vlak . club =sport rendert nog steeds niet.
Tomas Straupis (2024-03-10 17:26:36+00:00): Taip, negali būti. Jei yra bicycle=designated, t.y. kelias skirtas būtent dviračiams, tai negali būti highway=footway. T.y. gali būti arba bicycle=yes, arba tada keisti į highway=path+bicycle=designated+foot=designated - jei tai takas, kuris pažymėtas KET ženklu „dviračių ir pėsčiųjų takas“.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-16 06:39:38+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1259009199/history has construction = construction that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What construction=construction means? What you wanted to express by using this tag?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-04 05:39:50+00:00): I removed this geometry as tagging was unclear and Bing listed as source has nothing there