piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 11:08:43+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163601358
domiden (2025-03-14 09:40:13+00:00): Should be: “… ("Kassel-Vorderer Westen").”
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 11:08:46+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163601388
Henry572 (2025-03-14 09:45:48+00:00): und
D-Benrath/Garath: Ampeln bearbeitet, Grünpfeile für Fahrräder hinzugefügt
Da gab es Probleme beim Hochladen.
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 11:08:50+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163601525
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-07-15 17:27:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 185798781 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fiction added in error by OSMNAXA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20923
NeisBot (2025-03-14 09:27:41+00:00): Hello and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because it appears to follow a pattern that could be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related.

Could you kindly confirm if your map edits were intentional?
#MapWithoutSpam #URLs
Taya_S (2025-03-14 09:45:03+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163602490
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 11:08:53+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163601767
Szymson (2025-03-14 11:22:09+00:00): Hej, hej, ale to nie jest prawdą, z PCK można normalnie w lewo skręcić na wiadukt
Tomek | Yanosik (2025-03-14 11:28:42+00:00): Hej, w zgłoszeniu miałem info, jednak może chodziło o restrykcję, którą wprowadziłeś (NSZZ → PCK). Już wycofuję, dzięki
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 11:09:24+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163601980
aTarom (2025-03-14 14:45:53+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, una consulta sobre el tag
"name:en1"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12475298/history
¿es necesario o es un error?
Saludos
domiden (2025-03-14 09:40:29+00:00): Should be: “… ("Kassel-Vorderer Westen").”
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 11:09:39+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163602320
amosharper (2025-09-30 15:06:13+00:00): FYI, this was an incorrect change. This is not a driveway. Reverted in change 172665082.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-01 13:07:51+00:00): Sorry! I will try to avoid such mistakes in future.

Now that I look at it again, this was fairly stupid edit from me.

Sorry!
NeisReview (2025-03-14 19:27:58+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163602448
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-15 04:21:03+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17396
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 11:10:09+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163602471
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 11:10:28+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163602572
Andrea Musuruane (2025-05-16 12:33:55+00:00): Fatto revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166348990
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 11:11:19+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163603126
NeisBot (2025-03-14 10:06:42+00:00): Hello and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because it appears to follow a pattern that could be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related.

Could you kindly confirm if your map edits were intentional?
#MapWithoutSpam #URLs
Taya_S (2025-03-14 10:09:13+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163603436
ivanbranco (2025-03-14 11:07:54+00:00): Ciao Vaizeman, 

hai letto questi messaggi?

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4742466
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-14 11:11:40+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163603573
IlBano (2025-03-14 17:35:23+00:00): Vaizeman. Hai più di 100 commenti su altrettanti changeset a cui non hai risposto.
Andrea ti ha segnalato che questo tipo di mappatura non è corretto, e non perchè è una sua opinione, ma perchè è una prassi condivisa e accettata.
Stiamo perdendo tutti parecchio tempo e non ci guadagna nessuno: tu metti cose che vengono rimosse, altri mapper perdono tempo a segnalarti il problema e a correggere.
GerdP (2025-03-16 11:22:39+00:00): Zahlendreher: Radtour am 13.3.
Gazer75 (2025-03-14 14:29:53+00:00): You need to provide proper changeset description. One letter or number is not acceptable.
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-03-17 06:14:39+00:00): Hi!
"Schneeheide" ist not the name of the street.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Best regards
Roger Wilco
NeisBot (2025-03-14 10:39:41+00:00): Hello and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because it appears to follow a pattern that could be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related.

Could you kindly confirm if your map edits were intentional?
#MapWithoutSpam #URLs
Taya_S (2025-03-14 10:43:10+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163604506
Manuel H (2026-03-29 10:22:55+00:00): Hallo,

bitte nicht 'access' und die spezifischeren tags 'bicycle', 'horse' etc. dafür nutzen, ob ein Weg begehbar ist. Diese Tags kennzeichnen, ob man einen Weg begehen darf, nicht kann.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

Für erkennbare Wege, die nicht mehr nutzbar sind, lifecycle-Prefixes nutzen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix

MFG,
Manuel
Henry572 (2025-03-14 10:38:02+00:00): Zu den Relationen siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Turn_lanes_(relation).
bwbuz (2025-07-20 09:20:31+00:00): Derartigen Unfug bitte künftig unterlassen und korrekte Attribute nicht verfälschen...eine Nebenstraße ist das hier ganz und gar nicht!
Znaika (2025-04-13 17:01:43+00:00): Hallo Neukirchener,
hier muß ein Neubau sein. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1340341632
Guck bitte die letzten Luftbilder von NRW iDOP! Warum hast du es auf demolished gesetzt?  Oder hast du dich vertan und das Altbau Hausnr. 16 wäre abgerissen???
Gruß, Znaika
Znaika (2025-04-13 17:06:11+00:00): übrigens, Nr. 16 ist bei ALKIS falsch (ein Tippfehler). Hier soll 36 sein. 16 ist hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236841084
Znaika (2025-04-13 17:15:44+00:00): gecheckt: osm.org/way/236841084 ist Jägerhof 16; Neubau Ferdinandstraße 36 ???
rempshaener (2025-05-01 13:37:39+00:00): ja richtig, Hausnummer 36 ergänzt
Layft Greater (2026-04-03 11:29:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9630956882

should be highway=crossing & crossing=traffic_signals
michael_ua (2025-03-14 18:56:07+00:00): This changeset was reverted due to vandalism.

fatobod143, please follow the street naming conventions https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B8#%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%B2%D1%96%D0%B7%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%83_%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B8_%C2%AB%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%B2%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%96%C2%BB

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163622929
NeisReview (2025-03-14 19:06:29+00:00): #NameChanges

Hi, welcome to OSM.

In the past 12 hours, you have made numerous name changes across various changesets. This included modifying names as well as removing other name:*. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.

You can find an overview of the recent changesets at the following link: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=22629291
NeisReview (2025-03-14 19:06:59+00:00): Ah, Thanks @ michael_ua !
NeisBot (2025-03-14 11:25:35+00:00): Hi Yuriy Melnik, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 10 highway(s)
- 3 building(s)
- 1 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163605820
NeisReview (2025-03-14 15:21:53+00:00): 👍 Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional.

#HappyMapping
Frans S (2025-03-17 13:54:20+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
I don't know how you managed it, but you mapped the same waterway twice within 10 minutes.  See changeset 163606606
I corrected it.
Best regards
Benoît C MdP (2025-03-21 15:08:19+00:00): Bonjour Yves,

Je n'étais pas au courant de cette interdiction. Y a t il un panneau qui a été posé et à quel endroit ?

Merci

Benoît
Yves Le Jan (2025-03-22 07:33:40+00:00): Bonjour Benoît

Seulement les panneaux des parcs et jardins... Mais cela n'empêche pas la PM d'y officier. Cf. https://bsky.app/profile/yanndorleans.bsky.social/post/3lk74dzus3c2v mais aussi plusieurs témoignages d'adhérents de PeS.

Les marquages aux extrémités ne sont pas du tout alignés avec le nouveau règlement du jardin. 

D'avance merci ce qui pourrait être fait sur cette zone toujours très peu cyclamicale du quai St Bernard.

cheers
Y
Frans S (2025-03-17 12:01:51+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please solve the issues shown by the Issue triangle before you upload your mappings.
Each crossing waterway/highway need to be tagged. Mostly as a ford.
I have my doubts about the culvert you mapped. I see no proof of a culvert. Just a ford might be better.
Check this address on Google Earth
7.4451761 16.5033035
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2025-03-17 12:04:52+00:00): When you map close to the border, please continue a bit over the border so that it is visible to other mappers.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-03-17 16:01:56+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
When you map waterways, please check the flow directon.
Best regards
NeisBot (2025-03-14 12:03:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-03-21 19:41:59+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163922127
Frans S (2025-03-17 16:30:48+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please solve the issues shown by the issue triangle before you upload your mapping.
You did not tag the highway/waterway crossings, Mostly a ford.
Be sure you connected both waterway and highway when adding a crossing tag.
Best regards
Taya_S (2025-03-14 12:06:13+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163607433
NeisBot (2025-03-14 12:15:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
wolfbert (2026-05-13 05:22:37+00:00): Hallo, das Multipolygon für das Kartenbüro ist geometrisch nicht ganz sauber (berührende Ringe) und auch zuviel Aufwand hier. Das Teil hat nur einen Eingang mit Vordach, das lässt sich mit einem einzigen building-Polygon erledigen.
Ziemowit Zabawa (2025-03-14 12:21:42+00:00): Wyjaśniam motywację tego zestawu zmian: podobne zmiany są od ponad roku na węźle Powązkowska na S8/DK7 (al. Prymasa Tysiąclecia). Jeśli ktoś jedzie S8 ze strony Warszawy i chce zjechać na Mszczonowską (dawna DK8) w kierunku Janek, to jeszcze nie wjeżdża na DW788. Stąd usunięcie tagów ref, członów relacji oraz przekwalifikowanie na _link. Analogicznie jak ktoś chce zrobić zawrotkę na DW788 tuż przed S8 albo wjechać od Janek na S8 na Katowice lub na DW788 – ten krótki odcinek nie zasługuje na pełne primary, tylko na _link. Ewentualnie można by było zmienić na pełne secondary, jeśli DW788 również zostanie przekwalifikowana na secondary.
ivanbranco (2025-04-18 09:19:02+00:00): Hi GPS-Hobby 600,

what's this information node? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12662639450

is the islet really called "Memory of Costa Concordia"?
NeisBot (2025-03-14 12:30:41+00:00): Hello and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because it appears to follow a pattern that could be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related.

Could you kindly confirm if your map edits were intentional?
#MapWithoutSpam #URLs
Taya_S (2025-03-14 13:16:16+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163609842
NeisReview (2025-03-14 12:40:04+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
JauntingJ13 (2025-03-14 12:53:26+00:00): These were intentional.
NeisReview (2025-03-14 12:56:04+00:00): Thanks for your reply.

Do you know the following OSM wiki page for using the name-tag? 

https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:name
Udarian (2025-03-14 17:42:55+00:00): also please leave better change set comments:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
a hashtag doesn't tell me much.
Taya_S (2025-03-14 13:31:21+00:00): Hello abaho joshua,

A few question.

Could you explain why you added a residential landuse in this location and why it has this particular shape?

Why did you use the changeset description "Fixed object without tags" while in actuality you created a new landuse here? And why is this changeset in a completely different part of the country from where the challenge is?

This seems to contradict what we previously discussed regarding your block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17383

Looking forward to your response.

Taya Snijder, 
OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-15 00:05:22+00:00): I don't think they read any comments since they haven't responded to any. This is just the same randomly shaped landuse with no or minimal alignment to imagery same as most previous edits.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163608645
Taya_S (2025-03-15 16:31:19+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17399
gurglypipe (2025-03-18 09:49:41+00:00): If there’s a speed limit on these newly constructed residential roads, does that mean construction is now complete?
Pete Owens (2025-03-21 14:27:23+00:00): They are entirely within a 20 mph zone, and only accessible from streets with 20 mph signage. There is no contradictory signage at the entrance, so that is the speed limit that applies.
gurglypipe (2025-03-21 15:00:04+00:00): Thanks for the reply. That makes sense, but it’s not what I asked :)  I was asking if these roads could now be marked as complete and open to traffic? Presumably you surveyed the area to know about the signage at the entrance
NeisReview (2025-03-14 12:53:48+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
NeisRevert (2025-03-21 20:34:41+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163622128
NeisBot (2025-03-14 17:18:33+00:00): Hi JauntingJ13, and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear or difficult to understand.

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment
Maksim Hradaboyeu (2025-03-14 12:55:37+00:00): Also change road type, geometry and tagging, removed roads according to Bing Maps Aerial and OSMWiki
Famlam (2025-03-15 11:33:19+00:00): Hi Rubenke, wederom hier typo's in de highway tag van de platforms, zowel bij een van de haltes 2e oude heselaan en vuurdoornstraat
Famlam (2025-03-18 22:15:57+00:00): Herstel in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163794671
NeisBot (2025-03-14 13:10:13+00:00): Hello and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because it appears to follow a pattern that could be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related.

Could you kindly confirm if your map edits were intentional?
#MapWithoutSpam #URLs
Taya_S (2025-03-14 13:15:59+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163609832
woodpeck_repair (2025-04-15 06:32:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164967840 where the changeset comment is: revert edits after no reaction in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163821108, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163807554
Syl (2025-03-14 15:29:36+00:00): Bonjour, je viens de corriger les ascenseurs, vous les aviez ajouté en double, à la fois comme une surface et comme un point (je les ai aussi corrigé sur Bellevue).
b-jazz (2025-03-15 17:09:24+00:00): Thanks for helping out with this MapRoulette challenge!
mapper32468 (2025-03-15 15:54:20+00:00): Da scheint wohl beim Bearbeiten etwas schiefgegangen zu sein
❤️‍🔥 (2025-03-15 02:55:00+00:00): burger king was already mapped, please don't ignore the errors in the editor, which explained why this is invalid
pyram (2025-03-20 20:35:17+00:00): Review:
Danke für den Versuch. Man sollte aber nicht die Adresse(n) als Gebäudenamen eintragen. Hausnummern werden standardmäßig mit "addr:housenumber" erfasst (falls man das nicht über die iD-Maske erfassen will. Also einfach einen Punkt erzeugen und 
addr:housenumber=10
addr:street=Christoph-Willibald-Gluck-Weg
erfassen. Ort und PLZ sind optional und werden in D eigentlich nicht gebraucht. Dafür sind die Gebiete bereits vollständig vorhanden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1100017

Gebäudenamen sind eher so etwas, wie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314048908 .
Insbesondere, wenn ein Gebäude mehrere Adressen hat, dann sollte man dafür auch mehrere Einzelpunkte in das Gebäude setzen oder besser an die jeweiligen Eingangstüren. Dann ist den Datennutzern/Routern auch klar, dass es mehrere sind und können diese auch vernünftig finden ;-)
Einfach einmal selber probieren. Nachbessern geht ja immer noch...
user_21817046 (2025-03-21 09:21:00+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Infos :)
t_ja (2025-03-14 19:58:11+00:00): Ahoj,
zopar poznamok k tvojim upravam:
1) najprv si treba precitat OSM WiKi (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway), citujem: "Ways that are not marked as cycleway by traffic signs (and are therefore open to non-bicycle traffic (e.g., moped or horse) should typically be tagged as highway=path instead of highway=cycleway".
Cize otagovat vsetky chodniky ako cycleway nie je spravne. Pokial su tam vyznacene nejake (aj neoficialne) cyklotrasy, treba pouzit prislusnu relaciu "route=mtb" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aroute%3Dmtb).

2) pri kresleni sa spajaju len objekty podobneho typu, t.j. cesty len s cestami/chodnikmi, pripadne aj vodnymi tokmi (ford=yes), ak tam nie je most. V tomto pripade si spojil chodnik s hranicou rezidencnej oblasti (bod https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12662762630), potom si nespojil chodniky, kde sa krizuju (bod https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9856061008), ale naopak si spojil chodnik s elektrickym vedenim (bod https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12662730963).

3) cesty sa nekreslia cez seba. Povodne bol chodnik https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/803100611 severnejsie, teraz sa z velkej casti prekryva s cestou https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/525140385. Preto je treba chodnik rozdelit v mieste, kde sa v realite odpaja od lesnej cesty, a zmazat tu jeho cast, co je zakreslena subezne s lesnou cestou.

4) GPX zaznamy treba brat s velkou rezervou, obzvlast v lese a hustej mestskej zastavbe. Radsej pouzit dostupne podklady ako Ortofotomozaika SR a DMR. Tam, kde to nie je mozne, ako napr. uzky chodnicek v hustom lese, treba spravit aspon tri GPX zaznamy a potom ich pri zakreslovani do OSM "od oka" spriemerovat. Cim kvalitnejsi je GPS cip v zariadeni, tym je mensi rozptyl zaznamenanych tras.

S pozdravom
Tibor
JakubBernat (2025-03-18 07:13:50+00:00): Zdravím.
Ďakujem pekne za spätnú väzbu.
1) Priznávam že som sa do zmien pustil bez podrobného naštudovania OSM Wiki. Dané relácie ciest som opravil na route=mtb.
2) miesta križovania ciest som označil bodom a prepojenie na elektrické vedenie a rezidencnu oblast som odstránil
3) prekrívajuce cesty opravím neskôr. Momentálne prebiehajú upravý cesty a pravdepodobne sa budú meniť
4) ohladom GBX beriem do úvahy viacero záznamov a aj osobnú znalosť terénu spolu so satelitnými snímkami.
❤️‍🔥 (2025-03-15 02:53:12+00:00): the parking lot is already mapped, you've created a 'garage building' which is not correct
NeisBot (2025-03-14 13:38:35+00:00): Hi Benny21815, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 81% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 highway(s)
- 1 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163610562