piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
b-unicycling (2023-02-03 13:20:53+00:00): It's a work in progress that makes me lose my will to live, so I won't do it all in one evening.
VictorIE (2023-02-03 13:30:56+00:00): Cool. I know the feeling. :)
kucai (2023-02-04 04:59:26+00:00): why duplicate existing bus stops? the route numbers don't really correspond to what's written on the bus numbers. The U based route numbers are not even used anymore.
angys (2023-02-04 05:24:46+00:00): The route number for U is still using now just that now we only display 123, instead of U1230 (Like U7700 actuallly is route 770, T1230 actually is T123). All the route numbers mostly are relevant unless Rapid KL amend the route recently. The duplicate bus stop will be merge, but take a lot of time. I will do some housecleaning to merge with the existing bus stop, just give some times will do.
AkuAnakTimur (2023-02-04 06:55:18+00:00): This is an import, it should be discussed first
kucai (2023-02-04 07:03:11+00:00): Well, as a bus passenger I would be pissed if I have to know some hidden caveat like that to find my bus. I'd assume what's displayed on the passenger information display is the one I will be getting on.
angys (2023-02-04 07:26:51+00:00): Ok, I understand your consideration, but the code i do not directly put in the route_ref section, I will try to trun all what you say in hidden caveat into the route_ref listed in the normal passenger system.
angys (2023-02-04 07:30:26+00:00): Per AkuAnakTimur's opinion, I will apologize for not considered it rather then this edit as an import, because I also do some comparision with the existing data, and can be say that most of them are tally with the current bus stop location. I think we may further discuss on this in our Telegram group, if you wish to have more indept discussion regarding those bus stop data.
AkuAnakTimur (2023-02-04 07:40:33+00:00): There's a lot of background stuff that should be done first, before hitting the upload button.

1 - Check the license. I believe it's (officially) under CC-BY. Yes - it's open data (that's what THEY said) but unless you have an official letter from related gov dept saying it's 100% to upload and distribute the data, then it's probably fine.

2 - Get the community to agree to add this data.

3 - Deal with any possible errors e.g. duplication of existing data and/or the simplest metadata structure (e.g. why the bus stop names is in all capitals?, probably many more)

At best, is try to alert the Data Working Group and let them resolve this (initial?) import work first.
angys (2023-02-04 07:57:03+00:00): I try to resolve in capital letter data and also duplication with existing data, but seems like it only can be resolve manually (and it is time consuming), currently I dont have a method to convert all into Totle case in one. But thank you for your sharing about this. I acknowledge that this is not an easy task. But honestly telling, although this data are mostly accurate and is open data but seems like going through process like what you list is needed.
AkuAnakTimur (2023-02-04 08:36:13+00:00): That's why you need to actually mention the plan of this import to the community, it's not getting a Yes/No answer only. There might be some people that can help - an import may not be a one man job.
rene78 (2023-02-04 11:10:33+00:00): Really a lot of double entries now. Maybe best to revert this first?
AkuAnakTimur (2023-02-04 11:40:13+00:00): I'm all in to revert this - because sometimes it's better to wipe less than ideal data than scrubbing things one by one.

@angys - let me know if you're fine, I'll write an email to the Data Working Group, just let them do the dirty work.
Zh9567 (2023-02-04 12:07:39+00:00): I don't think this should be imported to OpenStreetMap. Not only because of the license, I found out that some data is outdated. According to the original data, most are last updated 2021, and some bus routes shown there might ceased operation or revamped. And the names of some bus stops are different from what shown on the signboard or official websites. So I think it is better to revert this.
angys (2023-02-04 12:09:35+00:00): For me, I am deleteing (and duplicating ) those who already have the bus stop previously, for the others I think the best way is to delete via filter the tagging. If you want to let DWG to wipe out, I think please only wipe out these nodes who in the first version, as some of them already replace the existing bus stop. so if just simply delete all the new bus stop will also coincidencely delete some previous bus stop data.
AkuAnakTimur (2023-02-04 12:17:19+00:00): No worries. DWG knows things. It's better to let them do their things.
AkuAnakTimur (2023-02-04 12:18:29+00:00): You OK with revert @angys? If you agree, I can let the DWG help revert this.
angys (2023-02-04 13:09:21+00:00): I will follow the community opinion, since most of here do want a revert.
AkuAnakTimur (2023-02-04 13:23:25+00:00): Alright. I've sent an email to the DWG.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-02-05 05:56:35+00:00): Reverted by DWG for undiscussed import: changeset/132097931
rohieb (2023-04-30 20:14:02+00:00): Ich hab das building=yes mal wieder hinzugefügt, Gebäude scheint ja noch zu existieren, auch wenn kein edeka mehr drin ist.
vicente lopez 2021 (2023-02-02 14:57:06+00:00): thanks
mawutor (2023-02-04 00:13:59+00:00): Thank you for your map contribution in Nkwanta. Great mapping only some few building were glued  together. When mapping building that are very close; please zoom as much as you can and draw the lines as close as possible but should not touch each other.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131979404
pyram (2023-02-02 20:55:07+00:00): Hi ChrisRoid,
auch wenn dir Deine App das so suggeriert, aber man sollte nicht in jedem Fall einen Namen eintragen, auch wenn das Objekt keinen Eigennamen hat. "Friedhof" ist genausowenig ein Eigenname, wie "Haus" für ein Wohngebäude.

Danke
pyram
ChrisRoid (2023-02-02 21:27:04+00:00): Alles klar, vielen Dank!
canfe (2023-02-02 17:37:39+00:00): Gli indirizzi non dovrebbero essere associati ad un building (che potrebbe averne più di uno) bensì ad un singolo nodo posto vicino all'ingresso sulla pubblica via.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131979602
canfe (2023-03-19 08:12:22+00:00): Passati più di due mesi ho provveduto io...
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131979602
xmau (2023-03-19 17:33:37+00:00): grazie (anche perché mica avevo capito come fare...)
canfe (2023-03-19 18:15:11+00:00): Basta chiedere.
Immagino tu conosca il posto: a monte della casa, sulla bialera dei mulini, son segnati tre guadi, son proprio guadi o son dei culvert?
xmau (2023-03-19 18:33:13+00:00): Definisci "culvert" :-) 
Ci sono delle lose che permettono di attraversare la bealera senza toccare l'acqua.
canfe (2023-03-20 07:03:59+00:00): Per ogni tag c'è la spiegazione in wiki.
Tutti e tre con lose?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dculvert
canfe (2023-03-20 07:10:25+00:00): E qui c'è davvero un guado?
E qualche metro a valle del rio Venaus, il canale è intubato? A me sembra di no.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7117178880
xmau (2023-03-20 08:23:49+00:00): Lì non ci sono mai passato, non lo so. È probabile che passi sotto il rio Venaus, sul resto dovrei salire e controllare ma mi ci andranno dei mesi...
jmarchon (2023-02-08 06:15:01+00:00): Thank you! I forgot about this :-)
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-14 06:23:21+00:00): What exactly did you do?  Please use good changeset comments to answer the basic queetion of "What did you do?" And "Why did you do it?"

Good changeset comments are important on OSM so data can be verified and checked.
felipeeugenio (2023-02-01 22:31:33+00:00): Estimado. Por favor leer la wiki por el cómo agregar las ciclovías. Por lo menos en el sector de Aculeo la ciclovía no es una contrucción independiente. Hay casos, como éste, en lo que la ciclovía está unida a la calle y se dibuja de manera distinta. Revisar por favor zonas de providencia y el centro de santiago. gracias (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway)
PraPraCL (2023-02-01 23:05:42+00:00): gracias, tomare eso en cuenta :-)
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-14 06:23:37+00:00): What exactly did you do?  Please use good changeset comments to answer the basic queetion of "What did you do?" And "Why did you do it?"

Good changeset comments are important on OSM so data can be verified and checked.
ivanbranco (2023-02-02 09:36:34+00:00): Ciao MRCento, benvenuto su OSM

ma questa Tranvia è ancora visibile sul posto? Sennò forse sarebbe un progetto piu' adatto a https://openhistoricalmap.org/
MRCento (2023-02-02 12:22:28+00:00): Ciao, grazie per il commento
Alcuni brevi tratti della linea (in via Frascati e al capolinea di piazza di Cinecittà) sono rimasti visibili, benché siano parzialmente coperti dall'asfalto
Ho deciso di rappresentare il tracciato in via propedeutica al tracciamento delle varie tratte (urbane e extraurbane) chiuse fra i primi anni '50 e oggi, come visibile per le tratte chiuse, scollegate e demolite a Milano su https://www.openrailwaymap.org/
Ho deciso di iniziare con le vecchie Tranvie dei Castelli in quanto, proprio su OpenRailwayMap, è rappresentata una tratta delle stesse (fra Valle Vergine a Rocca di Papa e Frascati), però su un tracciato completamente errato
mawutor (2023-02-02 02:41:19+00:00): Hello Ramson, thank you for contributing to the 28for28 mapping campaign, please note you can map multiple buildings in one changeset before you upload(let say at least about 10 buildings, instead of  uploading one building per changeset); also kindly remember to press the letter "Q" on the keyboard to square the building out line.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131980356
skyper (2023-03-26 13:44:30+00:00): Hallo Dreisamfuchs,
bitte verwende StreetComplete nur für Beobachtungen vor Ort und nicht für großflächige Änderungen.
Warum hast Du in der Habsburgerstraße denn so viele cycleway und sidewalk Tags geändert? Dort sind doch alle Trottoirs und Straßenbegleitende Radwege als eigene Objekte eingetragen. Zumindest die `sidewalk:left/right=yes` sind wohl alle falsch, u.a.:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/949505989
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46050301
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245910637
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245910634.
Wenn an den Straßen wirklich kein Fahrradstreifen vorhanden ist, sollte auch das Spurtagging (https://wiki.osm.org/Lanes), ins besondere `cycleway:lanes`, `cycleway:lanes:backward` und `cycleway:lanes:forward` angepasst werden, z.B.:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246718703
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/944734547
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4870384
Schaust Du Dir bitte alle Deine Änderungen nochmal an und verbesserst sie?
Danke und Grüße,
skyper
felipeeugenio (2023-02-01 22:17:13+00:00): primary a los cables? supongo que es un error
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131980502
GustavoE (2023-02-02 00:49:27+00:00): Definitivamente fue un error, ya lo corregí. Gracias por notificarme. Saludos
InfosReseaux (2023-03-16 21:17:50+00:00): Bonjour Max,
Je vois passer ces ajouts de postes Enedis avec les références et c'est très précieux, merci beaucoup.

Un conseil pour que ces données soient encore plus utilisables : préférer mettre le GDO seul (12345P12345) dans ref:FR:gdo=* et la catégorie du poste selon ces attributs : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Power_networks/France#Cat%C3%A9gories_de_postes

En effet les UP, CB, H6... ne parlent pas beaucoup  à OSM et nous préférons les traduire en tags associés.

Un exemple de poste complet : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/62545594

Je suis à disposition pour préciser si nécessaire.
Bonne soirée
Emmanuel Arrechea (2023-07-18 13:37:47+00:00): Bonjour MaxR_6429,
Je suis en train de mettre à jour les numéros d'adresses des mairies du Pays Basque et selon la base d'adresse nationale (https://adresse.data.gouv.fr/base-adresse-nationale/64013_0230_00128#18.03/43.20345/-1.15495) le point que tu as ajouté ne correspond pas. Serait-ce une erreur de positionnement de l'adresse ? Est-ce que c'est bien le bâtiment de la mairie que tu as indiqué ? Merci pour tes précisions.
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Arrechea
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-01 23:00:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9124659524
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/487948761
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489076623
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/663662224

Dokumentacja adresów:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab (2023-02-02 00:34:42+00:00): Już poprawiłem zduplikowane elementy. Pozdrawiam!
VictorIE (2023-02-01 23:15:59+00:00): Yay!
Ivandor (2023-02-02 00:10:17+00:00): Haha it had been bugging me for a while
VictorIE (2023-05-16 17:36:25+00:00): Some of these have reverted to access=no
Clarke22 (2023-02-23 02:45:08+00:00): Hi ArizonaMapper,  Can you please put a little more detail into your landuse areas.  The sidewalk and the parkway is not part of the landuse.  Both sidewalk and parkway is public right -of-way, just like the rest of the street.  And the air photos have gotten very accurate.  The correct place to locate the edge of the landuse is at the inner edge of the sidewalk.  And in LA County, since we have nearly every building in the county mapped, many landuse area are not even needed.  All those houses are residential because they are houses.  The retail buildings are retail, not additional landuse needed.
ArizonaMapper (2023-02-23 10:28:04+00:00): I'm adding in land use information consistent with the rest of the world, which frequently includes sidewalks and streets as part of the residential land use coverage. There is no requirement that it stop at a sidewalk. As an example, zoom into any residential part of Paris. Polygonal land use information is indeed needed and important to map and cannot be determined just from building type alone.
Jakka (2023-02-02 09:19:36+00:00): Foute input. Verwijderd
NorthCrab (2023-07-31 18:58:12+00:00): And here we go again, I started a topic to decide on it once and for all, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/access-no-foot-designated-on-highway-footway-should-it-be-reverted/101907. The user keeps on making the same edits.
Note_Fixer (2023-02-01 22:42:35+00:00): mobile gas on airport property.
https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/depts/doa/provdrs/dbata/news/2023/january/1132023.html
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-01 23:00:55+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Wartość addr:city jest niezgodna z addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388686051

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388686051

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
VictorIE (2023-02-01 23:21:33+00:00): Hi,

It's good to leave a brief note, even if it is as simple as "Cavan roads" or similar. That way, if the same changeset includes the deleting of a building in Kerry, people can realise (more quickly) that there might be something wrong. No need for an essay. :)
DaveF (2023-02-02 14:29:34+00:00): Hi
This is clearly not an official website. The spelling & grammar is atrocious  It is not copyright of 'Pulteney Bridge'
Please remove it & all the other unofficial websites..
Aliaksandr Kopyshau (2023-02-02 14:41:03+00:00): Hi!
Del.
Thanks!
NorthCrab (2023-02-02 03:11:40+00:00): Witaj, Usunąłem nazwę opisową z tego obiektu (widać że jest to staw po oznaczeniach na tagach - tak jak np nie nazwiesz lasu Las, budynku Budynek albo parkingu rowerowego Parking rowerowy ;-P). Dzięki za tak sporą ilość edycji! Pozdrawiam!
Hermes_Logos (2023-02-02 16:45:54+00:00): @NorthCrab, dzięki, dopiero raczkuję w tym wszystkim :)
Glassman (2023-02-02 19:35:57+00:00): #TIP: you don't need to add a node and a building outline if the building only contains one business. Just add the info to the building outline. With multiple businesses then it's appropriate to use seperate nodes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131981454
Glassman (2023-02-02 19:42:01+00:00): #TIP: Instead of using a name tag, it's good just to add and operator= tag.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131981585
impiaaa (2023-02-02 18:30:57+00:00): Why did you delete the cross-shaped building? I can still see it in recent aerial imagery. If both parts are actually one building it would be better to make them into "building:part"s.
TheOutpost (2023-02-02 22:37:32+00:00): It's a turret to the building, so you are right, it should be a building part. I just figured it wouldn't be appropriate as the building footprint.
TheOutpost (2023-02-02 22:37:48+00:00): I should follow up and correct this.
TheOutpost (2023-02-02 22:41:21+00:00): I also need to make sure they have amenity=place_of_worship
TheOutpost (2023-02-02 22:54:36+00:00): Ok, I added the relation and the building=tower.
vasony (2023-02-14 09:53:43+00:00): Az utcatáblát sikerült már átírni? Mert ott legutóbb még Tói malom utca volt.
Lesliehu (2023-02-15 08:14:30+00:00): Még most is az.
Mathias_ADAV (2023-04-24 13:13:15+00:00): Bonjour,

je viens de voir votre contribution concernant la création de piste cyclable le long de l'avenue Louis Blériot

Cette contribution est inexacte puisqu'il s’agit en fait de bande cyclable (cycleway = lane), dont l'information est déjà présente sur le highway. Je vais donc supprimer l'ensemble de ces pistes cyclables.

Pour bien faire la différence entre les différents aménagements cyclable, merci de vous référer au wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle

N'hésitez pas à poser des questions sur le forum OSM France https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/ ou revenir vers moi : carto@droitauvelo.org

Bon mapping !
Glassman (2023-02-02 19:21:11+00:00): #TIP: while you can add speed limit signs where they appear. it is usually better to add the speed limit to the road way.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131981904
mawutor (2023-02-02 00:11:34+00:00): Great contribution. and thank you for taking part in this 28for28 mapping challenge. quick one kindly remember to use "Q" on your keyboard to square your building out line. Thank you once again
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131981911
mawutor (2023-02-02 00:19:58+00:00): Also take note; we map the digital foot prints of a building and not the roof.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131981911
Glassman (2023-02-02 19:44:57+00:00): #TIP: Just add a node for the business instead of a polygon. I'd also recommend adding a building outline then add nodes for each of the businesses.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131981928
Minh Nguyen (2023-08-15 03:18:56+00:00): Hi, looks like this changeset included a few buildings that are identical to each other, in the exact same spot. I’m not sure how that happened, or why RapiD didn’t warn you about it when you added them in from the Microsoft Buildings dataset. Anyhow, changeset 139895241 deletes the two redundant buildings. If you see this kind of thing happen again in the future, I’m sure the RapiD team would welcome a bug report.
beddy (2023-08-15 21:09:24+00:00): Thanks for catching this!  I thought I had cleaned up all the changelists that this happened on, but one day when saving (perhaps it was a slow connection), it saved the CL 2-3 times.  I'll go over with the issue check features in rapid and make sure there are not any other erroneous changes from that day.
mawutor (2023-02-02 00:07:49+00:00): Great contribution. and thank you for taking part in this 28for28 mapping challenge
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131982298
Johnwhelan (2023-03-26 22:50:42+00:00): You appear to be mapping buildings already in OSM.  I'm deleting duplicates.
impiaaa (2023-02-02 18:27:45+00:00): This is not redundant. It included the unit number range, which could be added to the building, but ideally each unit should have its own address point at the correct location.
TheOutpost (2023-02-02 22:58:01+00:00): I suppose. Looking at the imagery, that didn't seem correct, as the entire building is the church. I don't feel strongly about this though.
TheOutpost (2023-02-02 23:01:15+00:00): I see this is from your import. Would you like me to revive this node?
impiaaa (2023-02-03 00:01:21+00:00): If it's accurate. If the units really don't exist then they should be deleted, but there are plenty of churches that are just one unit in an office building, and there are plenty of churches that have multiple mailboxes.
Mathias_ADAV (2023-04-24 13:09:18+00:00): Bonjour,

je viens de voir votre contribution concernant la création de piste cyclable le long de l'avenue Antoine de Saint-Exupéry

Cette contribution est inexacte puisqu'il s’agit en fait de bande cyclable (cycleway = lane), dont l'information est déjà présente sur le highway. Je vais donc supprimer l'ensemble de ces pistes cyclables.

Pour bien faire la différence entre les différents aménagements cyclable, merci de vous référer au wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle

N'hésitez pas à poser des questions sur le forum OSM France https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/ ou revenir vers moi : carto@droitauvelo.org

Bon mapping !
JJIglesias (2023-02-02 00:27:48+00:00): Thanks for your Contribution to #Bolivia
BsRgds
JJ
Glassman (2023-02-02 19:57:47+00:00): #TIP: Instead of splitting the building, just add a node for each business.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131982863
adrianojbr (2023-04-02 13:42:52+00:00): O Uncle Joe's abre somente aos domingos ou você pretendia informar que abre todo dia (de domingo a domingo)? Se for o último caso, o valor da etiqueta seria Mo-Su... (no OSM, todo dia é de segunda a domingo).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131983380
Glassman (2023-02-02 20:02:47+00:00): It appears you removed half of the building. Can you add back the lower half? Just use nodes for businesses instead of polygons. If they are in separate bldgs, then it is okay to draw more than one bldg. Let me know if you need any help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131983470
NorthCrab (2023-05-13 18:52:46+00:00): Witaj! Mógłbyś się wypowiedzieć na tej uwadze? Pozdrawiam!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3687247
felipeeugenio (2023-02-02 11:38:50+00:00): Estimado, por favor informarse sobre el correcto uso de rags antes de hacer ediciones. acabo de pasar un buen rato corrigiendo por completo lo que hizo. Anteriormente ya se le había indicado sobre el uso de nombres descriptivos. Por favor tomar nota y tomarlos en consideración. gracias
archpdx (2023-02-02 05:53:58+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for adding details to this golf course. Please note however that fairways and greens should not overlap (see graphic on https://wiki.osm.org/Golf#Common_mapping_pitfalls). Please feel free to reply to my comment for any further clarification.

Happy Mapping!
Glassman (2023-02-02 20:08:17+00:00): I think access=no is incorrect. If bikes, foot, and horses are allowed, then just having motor_vehicle=no is sufficient. Can you review?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131984668