piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-14 13:00:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448355528

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-14 13:10:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10120841078
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10120841029
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293968952
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/405493493

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck (2024-02-14 14:45:07+00:00): You deleted over 500 POIs in this edit, and claim it is a "personal project". Have all these POIs ceased to exist in reality?
Lokai (2025-04-11 14:58:08+00:00): Hallo,

wie kommt der Name Ententümpel zustande bitte?
Der Teich befindet sich in einem MP, dort gibt es eine "Verschachtelung" so ganz sauber ist das nicht kartiert, können sie das auflösen?

Gruß

Lokai
Wanderer_und_Radfahrer_Anton (2025-04-11 19:53:40+00:00): Hallo Lokai,

der Name war mir bekannt, da ich aus der Nähe komme.
Ich habe nachträglich nach Quellen für
den Namen gesucht und unteranderem 
das hier gefunden.: 

https://www.rheinpfalz.de/lokal/kreis-kusel_artikel,-spazierg%C3%A4ngerin-nimmt-schuss%C3%A4hnliche-ger%C3%A4usche-wahr-_arid,5703706.html

https://www.komoot.com/de-de/highlight/6604435

Zudem habe ich soeben den Ententümpel überarbeitet.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen  Anton
Lokai (2025-04-12 17:00:26+00:00): Hallo,

so hätte ich es mit dem Zeitungsartikel auch gemacht. Das handhabe ich ebenso, wenn ich Artikel lese.

Gruß

Lokai
VlIvYur (2024-03-16 20:50:03+00:00): Привет, Rocketdata
https://www.instagram.com/ozon_business_cis не может быть на ПВЗ. Максимум на головном офисе или региональных представительствах (если таковые есть), т.к. этот канал не для потребителей, а франчайзи Ozon'а.
+7 800 7750880 - какой-то российский номер, который на сайте Ozon'а уже не упоминается.
Веб-сайт Ozon'а в Армении: https://am.ozon.com/
Hans Thompson (2024-02-14 16:37:09+00:00): Lockheed ave. should not be listed as access=private.  The public routinely delivers and picks up packages from Everts, ACE, and UPS.
kmarkish_lyft (2024-02-15 11:41:23+00:00): HI, Hans Thompson! 
My name is Kate, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. 
In this changeset I didn’t add the tag ‘access=private’ for Lockheed Ave, I have removed it only for the middle segment. 
This tag was added long before my edits for most roads in this area (based on history the tag was added in 2007 by DaveHansenTiger https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/8910585) and in our practice, we try to avoid removing the tag ‘access’ from roads in the airport area without strong evidence.
Best regards!
Yunkers (2024-02-18 11:37:07+00:00): Hej,
Komentarze są bardzo ważne, ryzykujesz że ktoś wycofa Twoje zmiany, niewiedząc o co chodzi. Zapoznaj się z tą stroną 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Niewiele, a bardzo pomaga.
Dzięki,
ivanbranco (2024-02-15 18:41:54+00:00): Ciao pboscherini,

per mappare in 3d la wiki indica di utilizzare building:part=* per le parti di un edificio, non building=*, vedi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings#Building_parts

Ho notato poi dei strani valori di layer, ad esempio questo prato ha layer=6.1, cosa significa? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1250246522

In questo tirante invece (mappato come "tettoia") c'é layer=76, che sembra essere una ripetizione del valore di height=*: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1250325580
Considera che un layer 76 sottintende che esista un layer 75, 74, 73 e così via fino a layer=1
pboscherini (2024-02-19 09:49:35+00:00): 20240219T094545
	
	Buondì ' ivanbranco 4 giorni fa',
	
	in base al tuo testo provo ad elencare 3 proposte (per ovvie ragioni non condivisibili con la community fino a che le user ivanbranco>pboscherini non sono allineati e daccordo) di ragionamento:

	1) come hai potuto vedere dal mio log pubblico sono molto meno esperto della tua esperienza (densità ivanbranco: 17428 modifiche/4 anni). Al fine di allinearmi/convergere alle densità maggiori di esperienza chiaramente (densità simili=migliore stabilità e portabilità delle wiki in cui credo anche io), puoi elencarmi le way-id che ivanbranco ha considerato building:part=* e non building=* dal 1 Febbraio 2024 ad esempio?
	Buon esempio/similitudine sono il "pane quotidiano" di qualunque ruleship application? (spero che sia ancora così ... :-))

	2) In data odierna 20240219T100100 ho scaricato il log della tua user dal link pubblico https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ivanbranco/history fino al 10 Febbraio 2024 (data antecedente il tuo messaggio di supporto) per cercare la densità di lavoro di cui parli (building:part) ma con la user pboscherini non non ne ha trovate di id presso la tua.
	Ho trovato solo il changeset_147400541 che parla però del tag building:colour che merita molti anni di lavoro di modifiche da parte di tutti noi credo.

	3) In Italia è pericoloso insegnare che a 76 metri di una costruzione umana c'è una "parte edificanda" e non un omogeneo "edificando". Le "parti" di una costruzione hanno una ISO level list molto più complessa (puoi immaginare il post-processing di un box con solo due costruzioni a 20 metri di distanza, una con 10 way omogenee di tipo building=* e l'altra con un mix building=* e building:part=*) e si devono staccare per definizione non solo a livello documentale. Vengono fatti test molto accurati per garantire che ciò accada.
	
	Grazie in anticipo per la lista delle way-id di ivanbranco (che credo sia velocissima rispetto ai successivi punti 2 e 3),
	Un saluto,
	Piergiorgio.
ivanbranco (2024-02-19 16:29:51+00:00): Questo ad esempio:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1242989652
é una parte dell'intero edificio, non un edificio a se stante. Pertanto andrebbe mappato come building:part, non come building. Hai letto la documentazione che ho allegato nel primo link ( questa: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings )?

Riguardo a layer=*, tu parli di 76 metri, ma il valore di layer non é quantificabile in metri. La wiki dice: "Layer provides absolutely no information about relative or absolute height difference of objects". Puoi approfondire qua: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer

In generale in caso di dubbi sarebbe sempre bene consultare la wiki.
ivanbranco (2024-02-19 16:33:07+00:00): (in generale layer=* per le building:part non è necessario laddove height=* e min_height=* sono già valorizzati)
pboscherini (2024-02-22 10:43:04+00:00): Buongiorno 'ivanbranco 3 giorni fa',

8 ulteriori (4->11) punti verranno proposti di seguito:

4) la login 'pboscherini' conferma, in generale, che la login 'ivanbranco' ha utilizzato una volta la frase 'a se stante', una volta la frase 'part non è necessario' ed una volta la frase 'Layer provides absolutely no information'.

5) Nella scritta di esempio "https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1242989652" e nel drill-down della pagina html non ci sono riferimenti della login "ivanbranco".

6) Nei sistemi e database la cui classificazione inizia con C come il presente CMS, la CC Creative Commons non ha regolamentato gli elementi che DEVONO essere 'part'.

7) Tutte le licenze CC (https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/cclicenses/)
autorizzano ed abilitano ("enables") al "build" ("costruire").
Utilizzando il CC "adapt" si può passare da "build" ("costruire") a "building" ("costruendo").

8) Non consiglio di confondere "build" con "INSERT STATEMENT".

9) Se DOVEVANO, erano presenti strong-rules di CC o key che non permettevano di vedere ad esempio in un database la seguente scena:

rowid0   ....
rowid1   building=yes
rowid2   building:part=yes
rowid.......

oppure

rowid0   ...
rowid1   ...
rowid2   ...
rowid3   ...
rowid4   ...
rowid5   building:part=yes
rowid6   building=yes

10) Non appena verrà applicata la regola che proponi, che tra l'altro considero buona nel nostro ordinamneto ASCII, gli amministratori CC chiederanno la LISTA delle difformità ed esporranno come trattarle. 
Chiederanno agli amministratori di lanciare un batch per eliminare o convertire building multipli per ogni lat/lon e poi creeranno la strong-rule, prima software e poi su database.

11) Attendo la lista delle way-id della login 'ivanbranco' considerate building:part per ogni lat/lon (che credo sia velocissima rispetto ai successivi punti 2 e 3).

Grazie per la collaborazione.
Un saluto,
Piergiorgio.
Gustavo22Soares (2025-11-06 13:23:01+00:00): Oi, obrigado pelas contribuições mas o nome da escola deve usar a tag name=* não operator=* operator=* no caso de escola deve ser a secretária estadual ou municipal de educação ou a organização privada
Gustavo22Soares (2025-11-06 13:23:47+00:00): caso queira ajudar tem um projeto do Maproulette para mapear e completar os dados das escolas no estado do Amapá https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/53600
skquinn (2024-02-14 13:46:57+00:00): sources should also have included: MapWithAI; microsoft/BuildingFootprints
Firefishy (2024-02-14 16:12:09+00:00): What sort of attraction? If residential home it should not be listed as an attraction.
Frans S (2024-02-14 17:09:13+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping/ 
A few remarks about your maping:
Be sure to map buildings. No trees or just colored pieces of ground. A building is mostly good visible on the form and shadow it gives. 
Map More accurate. Your mappings are regulary oversized.
Map also round buildings. 
Quality prevails above quantity !
Best regards and keep mapping
balsoft (2024-04-08 08:14:05+00:00): Здравствуйте, это скорее всего не highway=track а highway=residential или highway=service. См. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dtrack, а именно:

> Данный вариант не следует использовать для обозначения именованных дорог и дорог, образующих соединительную сеть и/или используемых для передвижения несельскохозяйственной/лесной техники и/или людей. В таких случаях следует использовать highway=unclassified или highway=residential и уточнять тип покрытия/проходимость/характеристику дороги с помощью тегов smoothness=*, surface=* и/или width=*. 

Эта дорога явно ведет к жилым домам а не к сельхозугодям, поэтому **независимо от её качества** (т.е. даже если покрытие очень плохое) не может быть отмечена как highway=track. То же самое касается всех остальных ваших правок с комментарием "Тракторная дорога". Пожалуйста, учтите это на будущее.
svndu (2024-02-14 14:23:34+00:00): Should be changed to guesthouse.
silversurfer83 (2024-02-15 10:02:35+00:00): Hi :)
dann zeichne das Tor doch ein. Einen Punkt auf den Weg setzten, wo das Tor steht und entsprechende Eigenschaften angeben.
Der neue Weg sieht auf dem Luftbild aber auch nicht ganz richtig aus. Sicher, dass der Verlauf so korrekt ist?

Grüße
silversurfer83
ggpd (2024-02-15 22:14:22+00:00): Habe ich .
Korrekt ist relativ,aber korrekter als zuvor. Da hat sich in den letzten Monaten was geändert.
mcliquid (2024-02-15 17:09:51+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Raretrack (2024-02-15 17:22:54+00:00): Hi, McLiquid. Woops, sorry about that. I do try and keep these MapRoulette tasks local (one changeset per location). but obviously failed to do that here. I'll try and be more careful!
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-02-18 13:25:33+00:00): An issue with a highway was fixed. Thanks for the contribution.
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-02-18 13:26:19+00:00): An issue with the waterway was fixed. Thanks for the contribution.
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-02-18 13:27:20+00:00): An issue with the way 1077698771 has been fixed. Thanks for the contribution.
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-02-18 13:28:18+00:00): An issue with the waterway crossing the road has been fixed. Thanks for the contribution.
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-02-18 15:11:34+00:00): A road was fixed. Thanks for the contribution.
SekeRob (2024-02-14 19:33:23+00:00): Hi,

Your area correction could have broken the large forest relation now no longer rendering. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/273807#map=13/45.7304/8.9337 zoom to 1km and hit Ctrl+F5 to refresh your browser cache to see the effect. 

The problem is here according OSM Inpsector: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=8.93146&lat=45.77044&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

ciao
rhhs (2024-02-19 16:57:19+00:00): Please note that there is no longer a pedestrian crossing on the east side of the Nikola Vaptsarov - Atanas Dukov junction. I removed it a few months ago, but you added it again. I also think highway=pedestrian + area=yes should not be used unless the surface is significantly wider than a normal path (for a wide street, a square, etc.)
Dimitar155 (2024-02-19 18:21:54+00:00): For removed crossings, traffic lights etc, it's better to tag them with was: prefix instead of deleting them. That way other mappers will know that it was removed even when it's visible on aerial imagery.
zstadler (2024-03-28 06:36:45+00:00): Hello noelbov,

In this edit you have deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1626371 that is given as an examle of a type=superroute relations in the OSM wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:superroute#Example

Could you elaborate on the reasons for deleting this relation?
zstadler (2024-03-28 18:34:04+00:00): Hello noelbov,

In this edit you have deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1626371 that is given as an examle of a type=superroute relations in the OSM wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:superroute#Example

Could you elaborate on the reasons for deleting this relation?
SomeoneElse (2024-08-03 09:32:07+00:00): See also discussion at forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/revert-changeset-147456494/116932 .
eggie (2024-02-14 16:05:19+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. Probeer als het kan op de BAG adresnodes bij te taggen.
Je hoeft geen adressen aan te maken,
MV G
eggie
eggie (2024-02-14 18:18:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
paddenstoel (2024-02-14 18:20:10+00:00): Dank voor de feedback. Had deze wijziging blijkbaar lang geleden in organic maps aangemaakt en deze werd nu met inloggen geüpload.
Rom1 (2024-02-14 16:51:20+00:00): Bonjour, soyez vigilant svp sur la typographie des noms de rue dans contact:street. Dans le cas présent j'ai corrigé "Rue Des 4 Églises" en "Rue des Quatre Églises". Merci.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2024-02-15 08:07:55+00:00): Bonjour Rom1

Merci pour votre alerte
Effectivement nous avons corrigé.
Nous allons demander une évolution pour corriger ce problème

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
SomeoneElse (2024-08-26 12:41:47+00:00): This is wrong.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1250416670 is not a separate link road, it's just a turn lane on the A64.
Please undo your changes to correct the junction.
vtrtsxlegend (2025-08-05 13:54:15+00:00): Hi GrooveBox, do you know if Oxleigh Way and w1159734643 is still under construction?
GrooveBox (2025-08-05 15:23:26+00:00): I last cycled along it maybe 6 or 9 months ago and, if I recall correctly, it still had "raised ironwork" so I think it needed another layer of road surface to complete.
vtrtsxlegend (2025-08-07 00:51:16+00:00): Ok.  Thanks.  I will leave as is.
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-02-18 15:13:34+00:00): Fixed the road. Thanks for the contribution.
eggie (2024-02-14 16:44:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback   Mooi streven. Ik heb shop=bicycle toegevoegd anders zie je niets. 
De website heb ik ook aangepast naar de juiste format. https://www.bikestyle.nl/
Paar keer ctrl-f5 en dan zie je het effect.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-02-18 15:16:25+00:00): FIxed a building error. Thanks for the contribution.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-14 16:30:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11623521356
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238992169

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Marvk (2026-07-23 13:14:23+00:00): Hi UnkrautJaeter,

du hast hier den PSV Meeresreiter hinzugefügt. Gibt es die hier getaggte "Sandras Ponybande" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159539933) auch noch, oder ist das derselbe POI unter anderem Namen?

Grüße
MArv
UnkrautJaeter (2026-07-27 08:29:41+00:00): Hi Marv,

Meines Wissens gibt's dort keine "Sandras Ponybande" (mehr), möglicherweise wurde das Gelände des PSV dort mal genutzt. Lege ich jetzt meine Hand nicht für ins Feuer, aber soweit ich weiß gibt es das nicht.

Beste Grüße
UnkrautJäter
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-14 16:40:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1189266051

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-02-14 17:17:34+00:00): Dag paddenstoel  Wat is dit voor een attractie ?
name	Vlieland groet U
name:en	Vlieland Groet U
name:nl	Vlieland Groet U

MVG
eggie
paddenstoel (2024-02-14 18:15:22+00:00): Beste Eggie,

https://twitter.com/vvvvlieland/status/1253697840397852673

Dit is een bord / herkenningspunt. Aangezien ik geen categorie "landmark" zag, leek mij dit de beste benaming.

Groet,
Paddenstoel
eggie (2024-02-14 18:24:52+00:00): Dag Paddenstoel.. Een lastige.. 

Deze tags name:en Vlieland Groet U
name:nl Vlieland Groet U
kunnen denk ik wel weg. 
Die zijn overbodig.
Wellicht tourism=information
information=board
description=......  ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dinformation

Ik heb je onze welkomstmail gestuurd per PB

MVG
eggie
APneunzehn74 (2024-08-04 17:37:09+00:00): Hey, der Biergarten den du beim Hongkong Restaurant eingetragen hast ist laut OSM Wiki kein Biergarten. Solche Flächen werden als outdoor_seating eingetragen. Ein Biergarten ist nach Definition ein Bereich in dem selbst mitgebrachtes Essen verspeist werden darf. Das ist hier nicht der Fall.
Grüße Andreas
APneunzehn74 (2024-08-04 17:38:04+00:00): PS. ich habe das bereits abgeändert.
Byte Bumble (2024-08-04 19:44:49+00:00): Alles klar - danke für den Hinweis!
blackboxlogic (2024-02-21 18:54:02+00:00): Hi, feedback from an internet stranger:
Attaching land-use areas to roads makes it harder to edit the roads. Please don't attach things in OSM unless they are physically connected to each other in the real world.
Having many small land-use polygons that are the same type and touching is a little weird. It would be simpler to draw a single encompassing polygon for each connected land-use type.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147459312
0000FF berries (2024-02-15 22:24:50+00:00): Καλησπέρα Άγγελε, καλώς ήρθες στο OpenStreetMap :) Να είσαι καλά που θες να βελτιώσεις τα δεδομένα :)

Σχετικά με τις πρόσφατες αλλαγές που έκανες, θα πρότεινα να αφαιρεθούν τα ονόματα από τα σπίτια που χαρτογραφήθηκαν. Ονόματα βάζουμε σε κτίρια που έχουν συγκεκριμένο όνομα: π.χ. "Παρθενώνας", "Μέγαρο Τάδε". Επίσης, αποφεύγουμε να βάζουμε περιγραφές ως ονόματα, π.χ. "Σπίτι μου".

Οι παρακάτω σελίδες έχουν γενικές συμβουλές:<br>
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_aerial_imagery<br>
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice<br>
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Αν θες να ρωτήσεις ο,τιδήποτε, μπορείς να στείλεις μήνυμα ή να ρωτήσεις στο φόρουμ https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/gr/68 και έχουμε κι ένα κανάλι στο Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#osm-gr:matrix.org Στο wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/) εχει πολλές πληροφορίες, για παράδειγμα η σελίδα για τα κτίρια: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings

Tα στατιστικά σου στο OSM μπορείς να τα δείς εδώ: https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?AggelosZachariadis (πρέπει να κάνεις log-in).

Αν θες να δεις σε 3D κάποια από τα δεδομένα που βάζεις, μπορείς να δεις εδώ: http://streets.gl/ (θέλει λίγο χρόνο να φορτώσει) και παιχνίδια που χρησιμοποιούν δεδομένα του OSM υπάρχουν εδώ: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Games

Να ‘σαι καλά και πάλι και καλές χαρτογραφήσεις!
martin-kokos (2025-09-29 21:22:37+00:00): Dobrý den. Mužete nějak objasnit proč jsou expediční sklady https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11623650957 aj. označeny jako skladovací jednotky k pronájmu? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=storage%20rental
Mapování takového, asi provozně nezvyklého, prostoru by bylo dobré do changesetu popsat lépe.
VSA_ (2025-09-30 06:32:06+00:00): Asi to bylo v ten okamžik nejbližší mě známé zařazení objektu. Navíc je následně někdo další pojmenoval a typ také nevylepšil. Ne každý má informace k čemu objekt slouží a tak je fajn, že je na mapě alespoň nějak vyznačen.
Frans S (2024-02-18 10:31:20+00:00): Hallo EstherGeo. Bedankt voor het mappen. Het is al even geleden dat ik jouw werk gecontroleerd heb.
Een opmerking. Gebruik de tag 'track' voor een weg niet als die een verbinding maakt tussen andere wegen. Deze tag is alleen bedoeld voor toegang tot akkerland, bossen, waterwegen.
Vriendelijke groeten
Jarek 🚲 (2024-02-14 17:57:28+00:00): Ugh, sorry about the bounding box, I ran JOSM validator on whole data layer and didn't notice that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1192125034 was far away, it was downloaded earlier when I was making changes at Broadview station
yzal (2024-02-14 19:30:26+00:00): Pozdravujem, nasledujúce budovy neexistujú. Viem že sú v katastri aj na Ortofotomozaike, ale v skutočnosti sú zbúrané.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58378856
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1250499535
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1250499534
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1250499533
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/79903845
Filip009 (2024-02-14 19:34:35+00:00): Myslel som si, ale nevymazali im adresu, preto som ich prenastavil, ale vrátim ich teda na zbúrané :)
yzal (2024-02-14 19:36:52+00:00): Teraz pozerám, že vlastne už nie sú ani na Ortofoto. Tam vidno iba https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/79903845 ale tá je už tiež zbúraná.
yzal (2024-02-14 19:38:22+00:00): To pán Eliáš čo vlastní kúpele a všetko stavia načierno sa s takým niečím ako kataster moc neobťažuje ;)