piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
leonlül (2025-04-16 18:22:28+00:00): Zwischen 2023 und 2024*
silversurfer83 (2025-04-16 20:17:11+00:00): Hi

auf dem Luftbild sieht es so aus als wäre der Weg für zweispurige Fz geeignet. Sollte das so sein handelt es sich hier um ein "highway=track" (Waldweg) und nicht um einen "highway=path" (Pfad).

Wie genau ist die Sperrung für Motorfahrzeuge denn ausgeschildert?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165041851
cgoffline (2025-04-16 20:53:51+00:00): Hallo silversurfer83,

Danke für den Hinweis zu track / path.

Es steht dort ein Schild des Forstamtes: "Nichtöffentlicher Waldweg für das Befahren mit Kraftfahrzeugen durch Unbefugte gesperrt [...]"

Gruß,
cgoffline
silversurfer83 (2025-04-16 21:00:34+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung.

Dann sollte der Weg ein "highway=track" sein und als Beschränkung könnte "motor_vehicle=permit" oder "private" gesetzt werden.

Cheers
BCNorwich (2025-04-17 05:07:34+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for adding the AED.

Is that defibrillator fixed to the wall of the community_centre? Or is it fixed to a post or wall beside the footpath?

Regards Bernard.
Quimby5 (2025-04-18 16:48:36+00:00): Hi JKobbero, you flagged this changeset for review. Looks pretty good to me, just a couple comments: 1) The way ends just short of the intersection with the rail trail - best practice is to end ways at intersections, or where the attributes change. This will help avoid unexpected consequences when routing.
2) While "FSR" can be common usage in some circles, names should always be spelled out in full.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations

Thanks, happy mapping!
JKobbero (2025-05-10 00:11:27+00:00): Awesome, thank you've updated the road to their complete name. and connected the road to the intersection with the rail trail.

Thanks!!
kartler175 (2025-04-19 12:51:49+00:00): War es Absicht, dass Du folgende Wege gelöscht und damit das railway-Multipolygon https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6838462 verstümmelt hast hast?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463049060
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45263051
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448809564
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463049055
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463049048
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463049061
eggie (2025-04-18 07:48:58+00:00): Ook hier de fietsroutering onderbroken.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=165042090
gr eggie
eggie (2025-04-18 07:50:50+00:00): Fietsroutering weer hersteld
Dimitar155 (2025-04-16 18:48:05+00:00): The changes are based on the Bulgarian and Romanian cadastre. The border is altered solely for islands where it is clearly established which country they belong to.

Discussed in Romania's Telegram chat: https://t.me/OSMRomania/19416

The changes are as follow:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88358684 => RO
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/85406121 => BG
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16889604 => RO
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/213919011 => RO
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/213918957 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/213919044 => RO
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17019070 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17019111 => BG
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17503983 => RO
Hugoren Martinako (2025-04-20 14:58:18+00:00): Buenas, has estado cambiando la categoría de los núcleos de población sin corresponderse con lo especificado aquí: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas#N%C3%BAcleos_de_poblaci%C3%B3n

La variable discriminatoria para determinar unos u otros, está basada en la población o la capitalidad (comarcal o municipal).

Un saludo
davidbgr (2025-04-20 15:55:08+00:00): Hola. Mira, no se exactamente cuantos errores he hecho pero en las
las directrices españolas de usar "suburb cuando population=* ≥ 1000" van en contra de su uso en para núcleos municipales marcados como place=village, si no me equivoco https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:place%3Dsuburb se usa para " identificar un área dentro de un place=town (pueblo) o una place=city (ciudad)" <- Aquí no dice nada de usarlo en VILLAGE, cosa que tendría poco sentido, ya que (como está pasando), nombres de urbanizaciones están tapando el nombre del núcleo capital del municipio incluso teniendo población mayor. Es lo que, principalmente, he estado corrigiendo en esta y las correcciones posteriores del área metropolitana de Barcelona. Si creéis que está mal hecho revertid mis últimas ediciones. Por cierto, en las directrices españolas veo que no pone absolutamente nada sobre el uso de quarter, cuyo uso sería mucho más lógico para urbanizaciones aisladas y con identidad propia de +1000. 

Saludos.
Hugoren Martinako (2025-04-20 20:25:47+00:00): Sobre place=quarter, el tema es que place=suburb es un elemento con identidad propia, mientras que quarter es parte de de algo más grande. Técnicamente sería que un city o town > suburb > quarter > neighbourhood. Es muy raro que un place=village tenga tales divisiones, más allá de barrios.

El uso de suburb para urbanizaciones muy pobladas, es para distinguirlos de aquellos sitios poblados con menor población, utilizando el mismo discriminatorio que hay entre village y hamlet, actualmente de 1000 hab. Por conveniencia, se ha utilizado suburb habitualmente, pero en mucho casos se ha hecho de manera agresiva, por que "destaca" más. Y ahí entramos en el asunto de mapear para el render.

En mi opinión, veo preferible el reducir esas urbanizaciones bastante pobladas a neighbourhoods, que aumentar la categoría de los villages.

Acabo de ver que has revertido tus cambios, merci.

Un saludo
dadavid (2025-05-06 01:48:50+00:00): hi, 

was soll das denn hier für ein Objekt sein? Da ist nur ein name=* und sonst kein anderer Tag dran. 

Viele Grüße

David
Syl (2025-04-17 10:01:32+00:00): Hello, there is some other trees with the same tag nearby. Why don't you change them all at once?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-16 19:20:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12760415120

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-04-18 07:47:26+00:00): En ook hier alle fietsroutering geblokkeerd. 
Een medemapper heeft de routering hersteld. 
MVG
eggie
Harel M (2025-04-16 19:31:02+00:00): I was contacted by KKL and they informed me that this is not a campsite.
eggie (2025-04-18 07:34:39+00:00): Beste   en hoe gaat dan nu het fietsverkeer vanaf de Oostdam zuid naar de Oostsingel?
Dat is geblokkeerd.
Gr eggie
eggie (2025-04-18 07:45:19+00:00): Die gekke link had een functie!
Voorlopig opgelost zonder gekke link door bicycle=use_sidepath te verwijderen.
Nu functioneerd het weer.
Hier 'moet'alles op de schop, maar er lopen hier zoveel routerelaties..  Niet voor even aan te passen in vijf minuten.
MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-16 19:50:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12760446817

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
aceman444 (2025-05-16 09:01:39+00:00): Zdravim, na 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12753198412 je preco access=permissive? To znamena, ze kazdy moze prejst (aj akakolvek forma dopravy), kym si to vlastnik nerozmysli. Potom ste dali, ze cyklisti a chodci mozu bez obmedzenia (bez ohladu na vlastnika) a motorove vozidla (vratane motoriek) nesmu. To nie je uplne to, co pisete v popise. Aka je tam presne dopravna znacka?
user_5359 (2025-04-17 16:44:00+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1378144366, https://www.osm.org/way/1378144367 . What is the mean of the tag GPK_SCALING = 2?
schenklklopfer (2025-04-17 18:09:40+00:00): I do not know how this ended here... I've tried to fix a scaling issue in JOSM with this, which didn't work - it was a start parameter for the java...

Sorry, I'll delete is asap!
ticho2 (2025-04-16 23:07:56+00:00): Super, vdaka za upravy! 👍️
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165044310
voltairovicz (2025-04-17 08:05:16+00:00): Hej, zrobiles juz screena swojej walentynki? No to dobrze, starczy ci, teraz robimy revert xd
grzegorz75jan (2025-04-17 08:57:49+00:00): Kolejny taki wybryk będzie miał swoje przykre konsekwencje.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165044454
kitsee (2025-04-20 13:43:59+00:00): Hi, This road is most defiantly paved.
stasiu512 (2025-05-10 16:39:29+00:00): Cześć, droga faktycznie posiada taką nazwę i jest oznakowana w terenie, proszę weryfikuj takie zmiany zanim je usuniesz.
Barroszt (2025-05-16 19:55:41+00:00): Już zrobione

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166367414
Pastèque24 (2025-04-20 15:22:14+00:00): Bonjour, qu'est-ce que j'ai raté ici, concernant la LGV ? Je vois qu'il y a eu des modifications
AurélienQ (2025-04-21 09:50:06+00:00): Salut,
J'ai annulé les erreurs de débutant de l'utilisateur Pelage. C'est ses premières modifs donc j'ai annulés les erronées et lui ai envoyé un message explicatif. Normalement rien n'a changé.
Pastèque24 (2025-04-21 12:55:25+00:00): D'accord, merci :)
Kovoschiz (2025-04-20 07:59:06+00:00): Please don't add the taxonomy to `name=` . Use `species:zh=` etc.
Pikse (2025-10-17 13:55:23+00:00): Ütlen küll seda juba mitmendat-setmendat korda, aga palun ära ühenda truupe ja ojasid punktiga. Nende objektide ristumine ei ole samal tasandil.

Tsiteerin lehelt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer:
"Joining the ways with a shared node at the point where they cross would destroy the vertical order established by layer. "

Näiteks järgmised jooned ei olnud unustatud kogemata ühendamata, nende ristumiskoht ei vajanud "parandamist":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/803368232
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230330832
julcnx (2026-06-10 07:24:48+00:00): Hi Armire,  you added material=laterite to track 1378161694

Laterite soil only exists in tropical countries. Did you mean surface=mud or surface=dirt ?

Best, Julien
pwbriggs (2025-04-17 01:48:54+00:00): Looks good to me; thanks for the contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
You3njoyMys3lf (2025-04-17 13:26:48+00:00): Hi, a lot of these segments either don't exist or are not public access bike lanes. 
For instance, Way # 359652173 does not exist (I recently surveyed it).

Way # 401495455 is a children's playground and not a designated bike area.

Way # 451280802 does not extend that far in, this path ends where it originally was designated, I just surveyed that about a month ago and found the extension you put up to not exist.

There's a bunch of these examples where you've made private property as public access too. The "Lock and Dam 2" path is a railroad service road and has No Trespassing signs clearly posted. Could you please reverse these types of changes?
b-jazz (2025-04-17 04:56:48+00:00): Please fully connect fairways and greens together (like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1378169412) by sharing all the nodes that border between them. See the golf_course wiki for examples of what this would look like: https://osm.wiki/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls

Thanks. Please feel free to reach out if you need help.
HammTreetops (2025-04-17 12:43:40+00:00): Hi, thanks for your message, but I am confused now, cuz previously I was told not to join fairways to greens & have therefore, been doing it this way for at least a year & 1/2 or more. If this is the 100% correct way, then I will do this from now on. Cheers
b-jazz (2025-04-17 13:32:15+00:00): Thanks for getting back to me, and I’m sorry there has been confusing messaging in the past on the issue. We are trying to clear things up with documenting best practices on the wiki and spreading the word.

The problem originally stems from a very popular video that encourages people to *overlap* the fairway and green, which is very wrong. Tens of thousands of golf course holes have been drawn like that and there has been misleading messaging to stop doing that. But the correct thing is to butt them up together and carefully share the nodes at the boundary.

 I’ve embarked on a massive cleanup project to fix all of these so people have good examples to follow and I’m also working on chasing down anyone that makes this particular mistake and getting the word out to prevent it from happening going forward.

Thanks for listening,
b-jazz
HammTreetops (2025-04-17 13:48:04+00:00): No problem, thanks for putting me straight. Cheers.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-16 21:30:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/845745224

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-08-04 22:43:13+00:00): poprawione
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-16 21:30:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351664502
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/845745854

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-08-04 22:43:52+00:00): poprawione
VLD549 (2025-05-13 15:35:56+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes.
The link provided nood to be written with lower case, not with capital N (Nood). Could you elaborate why it should be written with capital N?

Thank you!
Glassman (2025-04-18 00:14:46+00:00): You renamed the pub Old Stone Brewing Company now Brickersons. The website doesn't appear to have anything other than Old STone Brewing Company.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165048607
Allison P (2025-04-18 07:15:39+00:00): Please don't connect landuse to roads. It makes it harder to maintain. Technically, it is incorrect, as landuse does not extend into the middle of a road. It is best to extend landuse to the inner edge of a sidewalk, or a road if no sidewalk is present. Thanks.
barkerid (2025-04-18 20:48:11+00:00): Whoops, sorry about that.  I think I've corrected them all
AgusQui (2025-04-25 03:51:43+00:00): No le veo sentido estas correcciones de calles que no conoces, basándote en imágenes que los demás no podemos ver, quieres actualizar un elemento pero como no sabes si la obra terminó podrías estar dejándolo desactualizado, ilógico.
LakeTana (2025-04-25 22:58:43+00:00): Hola AgusQui,
Gracias por contactarme sobre la etiqueta de construcción que añadí en este conjunto de cambios. Al revisar mis modificaciones, me di cuenta de que la fecha real de mi fuente debería haber sido el 21/03/2025 en lugar del 21/03/2024. ¿Sabes si la construcción ya está terminada? La imagen del 21 de marzo muestra que no hay pavimento en el extremo sur del Camino Rivadavia, donde se cruza con Roque Sáenz Peña. Gracias por tu ayuda.
❤️‍🔥 (2025-04-17 10:38:27+00:00): Hi, this page describes the typical charactertics of a "Residential Road": http://osm.wiki/Tag:highway=residential

For these private farm tracks, it would be more appropriate to mark them as "Track" or "Driveway"
jmarchon (2025-04-17 03:45:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
Kovoschiz (2025-04-17 07:25:17+00:00): 1. Please use descriptive upload comments, and not reuse the same as before. You are mostly editing buildings here.
2. You broken the 3D modeling here. Please study how `building:part=` are used before you touch them. Most `building=`  in HK are "wrong"  as they are a legacy of older methods.
M4teoAC (2026-03-18 12:48:20+00:00): Dicha ruta ya no opera
DaveF (2025-04-17 14:56:45+00:00): Hi
As you've created MP ways without inners these need to be removed from the Bristol residential relation & converted to standard closed polygon ways.
kaleidoscopica (2025-05-24 20:55:27+00:00): I'm not sure about tagging the residential houses as natural=wood - I feel that the polygons here have been too broadly drawn. I think the intention of the natural=wood tag is a natural, generally unpopulated forest, which residential neighborhoods are not - all the roads and houses have been cleared of trees, and are not natural features. 

I might see about redrawing these to separate out the residential area from the woods.
qstep (2026-04-28 21:17:25+00:00): Hi. What is the exact source for the shape of the Titanic debris area, and also your other edits regarding the stern and bow, as well as the OceanGate submersible? It would make sense to include it in a source=* tag.

Note that there is already n7034776558 and w452421116 mapped in the area. It would be preferable to modify the way instead (since it's older), and possibly remove the node. Maybe even include all of them in a relation, so it functions as a single feature on the map. Current data coverage is redundant IMO.

Thanks!
kaleidoscopica (2025-05-26 16:15:54+00:00): Wow, detailed! You might want to look into tagging anywhere a sidewalk crosses a road as a crossing, rather than a point - in theory this should help data consumers know that pedestrians could be crossing cars there: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Crossings
kaleidoscopica (2025-05-24 15:00:07+00:00): What was your reasoning for this? It seems you have actually removed information, as the area is no longer able to tell users that its landuse is residential.
kaleidoscopica (2025-05-24 15:04:04+00:00): Based on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dneighbourhood I would think the better approach is to leave these areas as residential areas, and in subdivisions that are named, place neighborhood nodes separately.
kaleidoscopica (2025-05-24 15:56:59+00:00): Also see this relevant discussion/comment https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/1kcrbz6/neighborhood_vs_residential_area/mq5kxga/
Layft Greater (2025-10-30 22:15:33+00:00): Seems to be incorrect
MassCartog (2025-04-17 03:40:48+00:00): Hi chaeshire, Welcome to OSM! I noticed in this change set you, moved a few nodes far away from the other nodes in their feature, its clear this is a mistake.

It also looks like you have added buildings bases on old Aerial Imagery. newer Aerial Imagery show a big apartment building where you put Shake Shack. 

Sorry to say but this whole changeset is inaccurate, and needs to be fixed. Let me know if you need help fixing it.
MassCartog (2025-04-17 03:51:37+00:00): Checking it out a little bit more I see that the shops you created are all part of one building. The correct way to map this would be to outline the whole building as one shape. Then use nodes to tag each shops location on top of the building area. 

But this changeset also still has nodes that looks liked got dragged out of place by mistake, so it all still needs to be repaired.
chaeshire (2025-04-17 04:11:19+00:00): I'm so sorry! I didn't realize I messed so much stuff up. I did a new changeset where I fixed the building stuff, but I don't know how to revert this changeset so that the random stuff I moved is back to how it was before.
MassCartog (2025-04-17 12:52:53+00:00): No worries! Thanks for responding. I went ahead and reverted the changes. Then I edited the building to show an example of what I meant by making the same building all one area shape. A tip is look in the right side panel for "Background". There are many different layers you can pick, some of the Aerial Imagery is out of date, so verify you are using the most up-to-date one you can before you start editing.

Check out this wiki article, Its helpful for getting started:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice


And here is more detail about mapping buildings:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling

And the most important thing to remember is OSM is a mapping community, so if you need help reach out to others. But responding is really the most useful thing you can do so thanks!
Layft Greater (2025-05-28 19:28:20+00:00): The ways on Evvias Street are now tagged with barrier=block. Did you intend to apply this tag only to the nodes in this edit?
Masherbrum (2025-05-30 03:50:44+00:00): Hello Layft Greater, thanks for reaching out! I added these tags as it appears there is some construction in the area. Upon further review, it seems I added the barrier=block tag to the ways as well as the nodes. I will remove the barrier=block tags from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26430442 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1378239458. Have a great day!
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Giorgio543143 (2025-04-17 08:48:42+00:00): the changes are incorrect, the roundabout was built in November 2024
Kaduna (2025-04-17 11:30:01+00:00): Hi Giorgio543143, 
Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you
Giorgio543143 (2025-04-17 11:32:13+00:00): I already fixed it
Kaduna (2025-04-22 05:44:37+00:00): Hi Giorgio543143, thanks for your patience and for re-adding the roundabout. We have reassessed the scenario based on your feedback. While our GPS traces did not suggest a circular pattern, we have deduced that it's mostly because the low volume of cross-traffic and diving deeper into our sources, we were able to see the circular geometry. We will surely use this experience to improve our editing workflows and thank you for communicating with us.
joel56dt (2025-04-17 16:13:48+00:00): Thank you for the update and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I added a few additional details to match the new business here. Let me know if you have any questions about contributing to this project!
- Joel
iandees (2025-04-17 14:15:28+00:00): Is the existing exit ramp under construction and inaccessible? Surely there aren't two exit ramps.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165053566
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2025-04-19 12:08:16+00:00): Hi, Iandees! 
My name is Yuliya, and I am the Quality Control Lead on the OSM team at Lyft.
I understand your concern. We have added a ramp based on telemetry and street view imagery taken on April 15th at 44.85879, -93.34728: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Eaa5VJa-nrxx73OBzDlQl_7c4zYL15bf/view?usp=drive_link. According to our telemetry from a week ago, there are currently two exit ramps open: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1i4XnKmD6BsxxD83TGeQMP3NwDo9-dLvg/view?usp=drive_link. It is likely that one of these ramps will be closed shortly. Unfortunately, we do not have sufficient evidence to remove another ramp at this time. However, we will monitor the situation on I 494 closely to make timely adjustments as necessary. Thank you for bringing this to our attention.

Best regards, Yuliya
iandees (2025-04-19 12:35:31+00:00): Hi Yuliya, thanks for posting the data! I imagine that the new ramp is temporarily open while the old ramp (the one to the east) is closed for repair. I will try to drive down there to see what's going on.
mavl (2025-04-17 14:46:14+00:00): Здравствуйте. В OpenStreetMap принято указывать "Крымский переулок" вместо "переулок Крымский".  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536046388/history  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
Hinja (2025-04-18 06:23:39+00:00): Добрый день. Благодарю, вижу уже кто-то поправил