piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ETPCU_James (2026-07-30 13:24:39+00:00): The address is incorrect. The location is not where this map puts it. If we cannot fix this issue this mapping software is LESS than useless
bxl-forever (2026-07-30 13:11:43+00:00): Hello,

It looks like a lot of work… but there is probably a mistunderstanding here. I felt I had to tell you before you do further edits like this.

amenity=parking is for large areas.

It looks like you tried to draw individual parking spaces… but the correct tag for those is amenity=parking_space instead.

Please make sure to tag them properly.

It looks like the alignment of the geometries is very fuzzy. That is a common problem in case you attempted to draw this by hand in the online editor.
kapazao (2026-07-31 09:34:34+00:00): No se dan referencias sobre el nombre modificado
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186641845
nevw (2026-07-30 12:59:32+00:00): Hi, please note that addr:state, addr:postcode and addr:suburb are not required in Australia as these are already mapped by the areas they cover in osm
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-30 22:45:48+00:00): There's still some unmapped parking areas, but you are by no means required to map everything, and those you have mapped are correct, thanks.

However, there is an issue here--you are still not using the service=parking_aisle tag correctly per the agreed consensus and documented wiki guidance, as I've explained to you many times by now. It is _not_ for any service road that happens to pass from parking stalls, but rather for ways that serve the purpose--and _only_ the purpose--of accessing one particular row of parking stalls, not providing through connectivity into or out of the lot, to other service ways (e.g. driveway), to other parking aisles, or that form the perimeter of the lot. This is documented in detail at https://osm.wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle 

All of this is the case for way 621498817 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/621498817 , yet it was still tagged as solely a mere parking aisle. I've had to once again correct this in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186673007

Unfortunately, by now I've given you feedback on this over a dozen times, with detailed explanations, diagrams, links/resources, and specific examples of how to map that situation, but the same mistake keeps getting made. Therefore, I'm going to formally request that you not tag ways with service=parking_aisle, as it is better to leave them without that tag than tag them incorrectly, leading to wrong data on the map, inconsistent rendering and potentially breaking routing. Thanks.
O1S (2026-07-30 23:44:59+00:00): 👍

I believe I had tagged that as a parking aisle, because it not only connects with traffic, but also goes past some parking stalls, leading to that change, I believe.
Axelos (2026-07-30 17:48:32+00:00): Bonjour,

Il s’agit bien d’une piste cyclable bidirectionnelle (par exemple il y a un feu là : https://explore.panoramax.fr/fr/index?s=fp;s2;p2bde5af9-1302-403a-bf7a-152ae014ca47;c39.84/4.18/12;m19.54/48.6782874/6.1694872;udefault)

Mais effectivement, la présence exclusive de panneaux sens interdit sans panneau indiquant une piste cyclable (B22a ou C113) prête à confusion.

Je vais ouvrir un ticket auprès de l’aménageur.

Axel.
kingkingHK (2026-07-31 02:09:10+00:00): Is it not this? https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=22.307713567988003&lng=114.16991006569003&z=18.909379867793103&pKey=1092264544597165&focus=photo&x=0.875071341876174&y=0.5056493019387435&zoom=1.5531661175415479
Kovoschiz (2026-07-31 09:53:40+00:00): https://www.instagram.com/hell.okitchenhk/
Kovoschiz (2026-07-31 09:59:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4862203144/history/5
bxl-forever (2026-07-31 21:13:50+00:00): Bonjour,
Cette idée d’« ajouter des adresses complètes » n'est pas conforme aux usages existants.
Non, les contributeurs n'ont pas oublié d’indiquer les adresses, c'est simplement que les adresses sont déjà renseignées sur OSM au bord des bâtiments. Il ne faut pas dupliquer cette information sur les pharmacies ou les commerces, cela crée des doublons partout.
Pourquoi avoir entrepris cela avant de se renseigner auparavant ?
pwbriggs (2026-07-31 04:56:46+00:00): Hey confusedbuffalo! Thanks for the tool.

I think that you were incorrect on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11253618657/history/4 and probably many others. I am not from anywhere near Poland nor do I know or speak Polish, but I believe that So stands for Sobota -- Saturday. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/sobota#Polish // https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_the_days_of_the_week#:~:text=Polish

Let me know what you think.
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-31 05:03:36+00:00): Thank you, in general I avoided So>Su for that reason, and I believe this was the only such change that I made. Based on the context of Mo-Sa being defined here and "So" having some different value, I felt that it was almost certain that it should be Sunday.
pwbriggs (2026-07-31 17:42:16+00:00): Okay, maybe it was a typo in this instance, good reasoning. But do you think that particular autocorrection should/can be removed from the tool? Or, is there an easy way to search for other people who mistakenly applied the autocorrect in this scenario?
Trafford_Mapper (2026-07-30 14:31:08+00:00): HI thank you for this edit, I've modified it to an area to better show the park area
NeisRevert (2026-07-30 14:47:01+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/186649160
Comment: "Remove vandalism"
aixbrick (2026-07-30 15:23:07+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
ich musste das und deine Änderung in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186645729 leider rückgängig machen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186650871).
Es gilt, was ich schon https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184476554 einem anderen Mapper geschrieben habe: highway=connstruction wird nur verwendet, wenn die Straße grundsätzlich unpassierbar ist. Das hast du mit access=no sogar bekräft, was aber nicht stimmt, denn Fußgänger können hier jederzeit passieren.
Im anderen Changeset hast du eine weitere Straße über die vorhandene gemappt.
Gruß
j7k6 (2026-07-30 19:29:12+00:00): Hallo, die Straße/Fahrbahn ist tatsächlich zur Zeit offiziell für niemanden passierbar und komplett umzäunt. Die Gehwege neben der Straße sind natürlich benutzbar aber ich dachte die Änderung bezieht sich wirklich nur auf die asphaltierte Fahrbahn. VG
limes11 (2026-07-30 21:27:50+00:00): Hallo Insulaner,

ich habe das erstmal zurückgenommen. Du hattest hier nicht nur den Parkplatz gelöscht, sondern auch den Weg, der offensichtlich mal mindestens für Fußvolk existiert und verbindenden Charakter hat. Der Pfad nach Norden mündet auf die Bundesstraße. Zudem scheint mir hier eine Zufahrt zum Anglerheim zu sein. 

Den Parkplatz sollte man dann entfernen, aber bitte die Wege intakt lassen, ggf. mit access-tags versehen und den highway-Wert anpassen. Die Zufahrt zum Anglerheim kann ergänzt werden, wenn ich die Luftbilder richtig deute. Ohne Ortskenntnisse schwierig.

Grüße
gurglypipe (2026-07-30 21:00:30+00:00): Has this section actually been removed from the NCN? If it’s temporarily closed due to a landslip then it would probably be more accurate to keep it as part of the NCN relation and instead map the landslip as a node with access=no hazard=landslide and check_date=(something appropriate) on the cycleway, to cause routers to temporarily route around the landslide.
eggie (2026-07-30 17:54:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
jbcharron (2026-07-30 18:58:06+00:00): Bonjour,
Pouvez nous indiquer la source de données utilisé pour améliorer les commerces dans cette zone ?
La source de données est un élément important pour contribuer a OSM et permet de s'assurer que les données peuvent être utilisées en toute légalité.
Bonne soirée
Jean-Baptiste
eggie (2026-07-30 17:56:14+00:00): Dag Nomad,

Lijkt me oke.
MVG
eggie
dcapillae (2026-07-30 15:13:31+00:00): Hola, Julio.

¿Tenemos autorización para usar esa fuente? Habría que comprobar bajo qué licencia están publicados esos datos, y si la licencia es compatible con la licencia ODbL de OSM.

Si no se pueden usar directamente, debemos pedir permiso.

En algún caso, la Junta ha concedido ya permiso:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Fuentes_de_datos_potenciales_de_Espa%C3%B1a#Andaluc%C3%ADa
dcapillae (2026-07-30 15:19:01+00:00): ¿Son referencias de las paradas de la EMT o se refieren a paradas de otras líneas? Si son referencias de paradas de otras líneas, habría que mapearlas de forma independiente.
rochirochi (2026-07-30 15:20:26+00:00): Gracias por tu comentario.

Estos identificadores aparecen en documentos públicos de la Junta como estos:
https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/contratacion/document/download?refCode=2021-0000048063&refDoc=2021-0000048063-5
https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/haciendayadministracionpublica/apl/pdc_sirec_documentacion/rest/descargar/documento/63826

Y sí, hacen referencia directamente a la parada de la EMT correspondiente. En el nombre-descripcion de la parada, se indica el código de parada de la EMT en cuestión.
dcapillae (2026-07-30 15:21:09+00:00): Te pediría que no sigas añadiendo referencias de otras líneas a paradas de la EMT, porque van a generar mucha confusión en el mapa.

Mejor dibuja una parada independiente con su propia referencia junto a la parada existente, si es que comparte el mismo espacio. No son la misma parada ni tienen la misma referencia.
dcapillae (2026-07-30 15:24:55+00:00): ¿Bajo qué licencia se encuentran esos datos? Si no se indica ninguna licencia, no podemos usarlos.
dcapillae (2026-07-30 15:32:36+00:00): ¿Hay alguna página web donde indiquen quién es el propietario de los derechos? 

Si sabemos quién es, podríamos pedir 
permiso. En cualquier caso, hasta conocer la licencia de uso, no podemos añadir esos datos al mapa.
dcapillae (2026-07-30 15:37:40+00:00): Tenemos permiso para usar datos del IECA bajo licencia CC BY 4.0: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Autorizaci%C3%B3n_del_IECA_para_la_incorporaci%C3%B3n_de_datos_del_CDAU_a_OpenStreetMap.png

Si estuvieran publicados por el IECA en alguno de sus portales públicos, solventaríamos el problema. Si no, mejor no seguir añadiéndolos porque habrá que borrarlos y es trabajar para nada.
rochirochi (2026-07-30 15:40:28+00:00): En los términos de la página de la Junta donde están los documentos que te he enviado, dice que los datos se pueden utilizar.

Apartado Propiedad intelectual: https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/informacion/legal.html
dcapillae (2026-07-30 15:47:30+00:00): Creo que no vamos a poder usarlos. Los derechos de uso (CC BY 3.0) se refieren a los textos del portal web.

El portal se publica con una licencia y luego cada documento o conjunto de datos tiene su propia licencia. Tendríamos que asegurarnos.

¿Podrías facilitarme también en enlace a la página donde aparecen esos documentos para descargar?
dcapillae (2026-07-30 15:52:50+00:00): La fuente original (http://dteducacionmalaga.hdplus.es/public/paradas/#) tiene una licencia de Google (https://www.google.com/intl/es-ES_US/help/terms_maps/).

Tendríamos que encontrar esos mismos datos en alguna otra fuente con una licencia compatible, esa no nos vale.
dcapillae (2026-07-30 15:54:20+00:00): Voy a buscar en el portal de datos abiertos de la Junta, a ver qué encuentro.
dcapillae (2026-07-30 16:02:34+00:00): No encuentro nada útil de momento. También he mirado en la web del Consorcio y en la de la Diputación.

En general, la Administración es bastante perezosa a la hora de ofrecer estos datos en abierto, aunque podría hacerlo si quisiera. No costaría tanto.

No creo que podamos usar estos datos sin pedir permiso.
dcapillae (2026-07-30 16:05:22+00:00): Dime si logras identificar al propietario de los derechos y el tipo de licencia y preparamos una solicitud.

Yo he enviado ya algunas. No siempre responden, pero es la única vía.
rochirochi (2026-07-30 16:05:58+00:00): Ya he pedido permiso a la Junta. Por favor, dejemos el tema estar al menos hasta el lunes.

No estoy en casa para responder a los mensajes al momento ahora mismo.

Gracias
rochirochi (2026-07-30 16:10:52+00:00): De acuerdo, yo me encargo esta vez. Así aprendo, gracias
dcapillae (2026-07-30 16:19:45+00:00): Descuida, esperamos el tiempo que haga falta.

Lo importante es conseguir una autorización en la que el titular de los derechos acepte que sus datos se publiquen bajo la licencia ODbL.

Si lo necesitas, puedo facilitarte un modelo de solicitud que me funcionó hace unos años.

En la wiki también encontrarás algunos ejemplos:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Getting_permission

La última vez que solicité permiso al Ayuntamiento no obtuve respuesta. Conviene tener paciencia y, si es necesario, volver a intentarlo pasado un tiempo.

Si te apetece, puedes unirte al grupo de trabajo y hacemos seguimiento a la solicitud: https://osmmalaga.zulipchat.com/.
O1S (2026-07-30 14:52:18+00:00): Confirmed by information from the FaceBook page https://www.facebook.com/zarrproperties
StC (2026-07-30 15:33:39+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
Sam Carman (2026-07-30 15:07:16+00:00): Forgot to set the source to aerial imagery
LambdaComplex (2026-07-31 04:10:55+00:00): access=no?
VLD0251 (2026-07-31 21:55:52+00:00): Hi dfahed, the comment “we are an Arabic country!!!” or “default to Arabic please” is not a relevant argument in the context of OpenStreetMap. naming decisions should not be based on a country's linguistic identity, but on OSM conventions, local usage, and verifiable sources.this topic has already been discussed within the Algerian OSM community, and a consensus was reached regarding the use of the three language tags ("name", "name:ar", "name:fr", "name:ber"). please respect this community decision:Community vote: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/voting-official-tagging-consensus-for-the-name-tag-in-algeria/142920The OSM Algeria naming guidelines also provide recommendations for multilingual names:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Algeria 
Please follow the established consensus instead of reopening a linguistic debate.
Happy mapping!
VLD0251 (2026-07-31 23:11:40+00:00): Community vote:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/voting-official-tagging-consensus-for-the-name-tag-in-algeria/142920
BCNorwich (2026-07-30 16:40:53+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your shop isn't the whole building, so I've removed your business tags from it.
eggie (2026-07-30 17:50:47+00:00): De info heb ik naar de adresnode verplaatst. 
Groet,
eggie
eggie (2026-07-30 17:44:13+00:00): Je vraagt feedback. Volgens mij was de voorgaande changeset juist goed. 
Wat was het probleem dan? 
Waarom pas je iets aan dat gewoon klopt?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=186652827

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-30 17:48:45+00:00): Reverted by changeset #186659041

De voorgaande edits waren van een ervaren rotondemapper. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-30 18:33:40+00:00): En volgens mij mag je hier gewoon hoewel niet zo handig nog rechtsaf vanaf de binnenbaan.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-30 21:26:24+00:00): Please don't delete existing features then remap them. If they are currently mapped badly, please just adjust them so they are correct. Thanks. 
Graeme Fitzpatrick                                                                                                                 Moderator                                                                                                                                      OSMF Data Working Group
kadiwa (2026-07-30 17:20:36+00:00): Hi again,
one mistake from this changeset is that you disconnected these two streets from one another: way/3977786 and way/185395356
After your changeset, they were only connected via a footway, which is not routable for general vehicle traffic.
I fixed that.
VLD317 (2026-07-30 20:38:30+00:00): Hello kadiwa, 

Thank you for catching that and repairing it. I’ll try to be more careful to catch those before I upload them in the future. 

Happy mapping,  
VLD317
dzidek23 (2026-07-31 12:17:47+00:00): Hey eteb3,
yup this part is needed so I reverted your changeset.

Not sure why you thought this was a separate tower as this is what it look like:
https://www.osmgo.org/bevy.html?way=27065040

I might actually look at improving the cathedral 3D view.
infeeeee (2026-07-30 17:42:16+00:00): Hello

What is that stuff in the middle of the ocean? Is it accidental? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=23/0.00089644/-34.63053653&layers=VND
infeeeee (2026-07-31 09:08:54+00:00): I deleted the compass rose: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186693705

Please don't add such non-existent features in the future, thanks!
GiovanniPen (2026-07-31 10:17:49+00:00): and please do smaller changeset
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-30 21:23:39+00:00): Use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies, and may violate local law -- see https://osm.wiki/Google for more details.

Could you explain why it is linked in this changeset?

Thanks.
fthierygeo (2026-07-30 22:04:49+00:00): I would like to revert this change; it was a mistake that shouldn't have happened.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-31 18:27:39+00:00): I see you reverted it, thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186655084
DaveF (2026-07-30 17:26:22+00:00): Hi Please only 'complete' if you're aware of what's on the ground. 
One is clearly not grass & i think the other isn't even a pitch any more.
Fatmani_ (2026-07-31 12:28:27+00:00): I saw it from the passing train and it looked like grass to me
TronnaLegacy (2026-07-30 16:59:22+00:00): Thank you for helping with the MapRoulette tasks. I just wanted to point out that building=detached is used more than building=house & house=detached to map detached houses, especially in Canada.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:house=detached

So I think we should be sticking with building=detached in Oakville.

Feel free to let me know what you think about this.
lakedistrict (2026-07-30 18:17:53+00:00): Thanks for your recent mapping around Greenodd. If the "recreation grounds" within the primary school are not accessible to the public it would be worth tagging them access=private.
honapak (2026-07-30 22:10:01+00:00): I don't disagree but tagging landuse=* areas with access=* doesn't seem to be the done thing on here? I presume because the area is contained within a school you can infer access permissions from that.

I also don't know for sure if these areas are definitely private, only that they aren’t landuse=grass, which wasn’t tagged with any access=* previously.

If you want to add access=private then feel free to do so, I don’t have a problem with it.
eggie (2026-07-30 17:52:17+00:00): Hoi,

foot=private hoeft niet als je access=private hebt getagd.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-30 17:29:57+00:00): Dag Ger,
Het is goed om te weten dat we een cafe toevoegen aan de adresnode. Dus niet de gebouwomtrek.
Mvg,
eggie
cgreggescalante (2026-07-31 04:41:25+00:00): Thanks for the contributions! I noticed you mentioned using street level imagery in your source and description. Just wanted to make sure that this wasn't using Google Street View or Apple Look Around, as those have licenses that are incompatible with OpenStreetMap. Thanks!
eginhard (2026-07-31 17:36:12+00:00): Maybe amenity=events_venue would be a better fit than museum?
Kinsio (2026-07-30 18:20:22+00:00): Hello Geofs User, thanks for your contributions to OSM! I just wanted to let you know that "Updated based on the right info" is a bit confusing for a changeset comment. The changeset comment should describe what you changed, and ideally you should also document how you know the information you added is accurate in the source tag (if it's something you know from familiarity, that's usually recorded as "local knowledge", and if you went out of your way to specifically check the information in person, that would be "survey"). If you have any questions, feel free to let me know either in a reply here or by sending me a message. You can also see more details on how to write good changeset comments on the OpenStreetMap wiki here: <https://osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments>. Thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186657688
dlegg73 (2026-07-31 20:24:26+00:00): Correction: Source used was Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2026-07-27
impiaaa (2026-07-31 17:55:48+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for contributing! Please note that OSM highway classification is not always the same as California or US federal road classification, so they shouldn't be used as a primary source. See here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance Also, while I believe copying data from Caltrans is fine since it's a government entity of California, which makes their data public domain, generally copying from copyrighted sources into OSM is illegal. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright#Proprietary_data
pwbriggs (2026-07-31 06:48:24+00:00): Hello https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/misty870808!

I have repeatedly requested your attention with a question at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185881839, but you have not made any acknowledgement of my messages. Please respond here, or at any of my other comments left on your changesets, or send me a private message via https://www.openstreetmap.org/messages/new/pwbriggs, or contact support@openstreetmap.org for technical assistance.
Dimitar155 (2026-07-30 18:10:32+00:00): Здравей,

Благодаря за промените! За в бъдеще избягвай да залепяш площни обекти с линейни. Това е лоша практика, тъй като последващата им поддръжка е силно затруднена. 

Поздрави,
Митко
eggie (2026-07-30 18:17:38+00:00): Ger dat is niet correct. Er staat een icoontje, maar je kijkt naar je oude cache.
CTRL-F5 een paar keer toetsen. Dan leeg je je cache. Ik heb je toevoeging weer verwijderd. Het cafe staat op de adresnode. Geen adressen toevoegen in OSM.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-30 19:11:39+00:00): Beetje in uitzoomen helpt ook.
kadiwa (2026-07-30 21:42:40+00:00): I have reverted this changeset because:
- the geometric updates are incorrect
- the crossing tags on standard driveways are undesirable, especially if crossing:continuous is missing (but even with it, still usually considered undesirable)
- you removed information from node/4618978096 for no apparent reason

At this point, I have one request for you:
Please stop your armchair mapping activity in Hamburg (and surrounding areas) entirely. You can find problems with the armchair mapping approach on this wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Armchair_mapping#Disadvantages_and_controversy

If you keep on introducing mistakes, I will consider reporting that to the DWG.
VLD082 (2026-07-31 20:39:44+00:00): Kadiwa,

We are currently reviewing this changeset and the feedback provided. 

Thank you,  
VLD082
Hufkratzer (2026-07-31 21:24:21+00:00): Hi,
the areas that you tagged with tourism=trail_riding_station 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1546087458
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1546087459
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1546087460
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1546087461
are no trail riding stations. The spanish translation for this tag is incomplete. I have just added a corresponding note there; please read the English version. On the aerial photos, these areas look a lot like riding arenas and in this case should be tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
Senihtu (2026-07-31 05:13:10+00:00): Hi!
Durch Dornbachstraße und Lahnstraße laufen einige Buslinien.
Legst Du die noch um?
Gruß Senihtu
PHerison (2026-07-31 06:16:32+00:00): Nein, weil ich nicht weiß wie die Umleitung der Busrouten verlaufen. Ich erstelle eine Note in OSM dazu.