piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MxxCon (2024-02-11 02:15:46+00:00): Hello.
This edit doesn't make sense. 6th ave is not called Bryant Park. Its other name is Avenue of Americas, which is already tagged. Nowhere along this way do I see any street signs with this name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147160936
Aleh Aliakseyenka (2024-02-12 15:46:35+00:00): Hello and thank you for feedback! The changes have been rolled back.
WoSoe (2024-02-07 08:00:18+00:00): Servus!
Noch einmal(*) der Hinweis, sidewalk:both=separate ist falsch!
(*) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146774786

separate bedeutet, der Bürgersteig ist als eigenständiger Weg eingetragen. Das ist aber hier nur auf der rechten Seite der Fall.
Richtig:
sidewalk:left=yes + sidewalk:right=separate

Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:sidewalk
Enock4seth (2024-02-07 21:20:10+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for mapping. I undid this contribution as a crossing won't exist on and administrative/water boundary in real life. Kindly read about Getting started https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide  before making changes. 

Happy Mapping!
mini-me (2024-02-07 12:44:44+00:00): У вас получилось здание внутри здания. Исправил.
Negreheb (2024-02-07 07:29:14+00:00): Servus SpoofiL, freut mich, dass du mitmachst und danke für die Änderung. Ich hab gesehen, dass du den Weg beim Moor gelöscht hast - das kann manchmal ungünstig sein, wenn jemand am Luftbild darauf stößt und der Weg dort noch sichtbar ist. Da kann es besser, das ganze mit dem Lifecycle prefix umzusetzen, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix - removed:*=* würde sich in so einem Fall wahrscheinlich anbieten :)

Bruachst du jetzt aber nicht mehr machen, ich habs nur zufällig gesehen und fürs nächste mal vielleicht. 

Alles gute
user_20979216 (2024-02-08 20:15:20+00:00): Hallo Johann! Ist das Account Nummer 150?
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-11 10:03:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 147321097 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits durch Sockenpuppen einer Person mit OSM-Hausverbot
eerib (2024-02-07 07:08:19+00:00): Hello Scott,

I see you're using the OSM Public GPS Traces. You might be interested in also using the Strava Heatmap. The Strava Heatmap provides a stronger & more accurate data, fresher data (important for trail re-routes), and coverage of more areas.

Here is an example of the iD editor with the Strava Heatmap as a custom background in an area you recently edited. From this we can see that the Strava Heatmap would have helped greatly in aligning the trails.

https://imgur.com/a/AoKnPRt

I have detailed a easy few ways to get the data into the iD or JOSM editor below.

Chrome/Firefox plugin (iD or JOSM):

https://github.com/zekefarwell/josm-strava-heatmap

Chrome plugin (iD):

https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/id-strava-heatmap/eglbcifjafncknmpmnelckombmgddlco

TMS Proxy URL (iD or JOSM):

tms[3,16]:https://proxy.nakarte.me/https/heatmap-external-b.strava.com/tiles-auth/all/red/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.png?px=256

Cheers, eerib
ScottNelson (2024-02-08 05:58:21+00:00): That's interesting.  There's a strava heatmap layer set up as one of the default images in JOSM, but it isn't nearly as detailed as what you shared.  Is a strava account required to access this data?
eerib (2024-02-08 17:37:26+00:00): A Strava account is necessary for the the first two web browser plugins but the TMS proxy url (nakarte.me) does not require an account.
ScottNelson (2024-02-08 20:18:36+00:00): Thank you I was able to set up the proxy in JOSM in all of 5 minutes, and now I have access to the much higher resolution data as an image overlay.
Road–Runner (2024-02-08 02:17:22+00:00): Hallo ppkapo86.
Ich finde es nicht sinnvoll systematisch die Autohäuser umzubenennen. Wie in diesem Fall tretet der Betrieb mit der Bezeichnung Autohaus auf und ist direkter Bestandteil https://www.autohaus-alpbachtal.at/, ist also imho nicht redundant. 
Ich glaube die jeweiligen User vor Ort haben sich schon was gedacht, als sie die Autohäuser so kartiert haben, deswegen fänder ich es besser bei Bearbeitung aus der Ferne mit etwas Zurückhaltung vorzugehen.
Schöne Grüße,
RR
Road–Runner (2024-02-08 02:21:22+00:00): Ich bin ganz ehrlich gesagt dafür, deine Änderungen diesbezüglich wieder rückgängig zu machen. Jedenfalls bei den Händler, die die Bezeichnung Autohaus im Namen führen und das ist bei den meisten der Fall.
ppkapo86 (2024-02-08 12:04:16+00:00): Da hast du natürlich nicht unrecht! Habe es wieder zurück geändert und werde meine Datensätze prüfen! War wohl eine zu schnelle Reaktion für ein Systemproblem bei unserer eingesetzten Software die Typ und Name zusammenbaut und so die Redundanz entsteht. 
Danke Gruß
PPKapo86
Road–Runner (2024-02-09 00:58:03+00:00): Danke,
bitte auch die anderen Edits anschauen und ggf. revertieren... Autohaus Luxner, Autohaus Mayerhofen. Es sind noch zahlreiche dabei. Ich hab nachgeschaut, meistens ist die Firma sogar so als Name so eingetragen.

Stehen deine Edits in Zusammenhang mit diesen hier? Hier gilt das gleiche.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147204969?way_page=2#map=10/47.3001/11.0572

Man kann natürlich drüber diskutieren inwieweit der Name-Tag den Poi-Typ beschreibend sein soll, aber ich denke, sofern "Autohaus" Teil des Namens ist (sichtbar etwa am Websiteauftritt) sollte es behalten werden, so wie es auch ursprünglich von den anderen gemappt wurde?

VG
RR
user_17222985 (2024-02-07 06:31:47+00:00): https://storage.googleapis.com/svoi-upload/92/181264/%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BA-%D0%B4%D0%BE-%D1%80%D1%96%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B9%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%83%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F-%D0%B2%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%8C.pdf
MxxCon (2024-02-11 02:24:25+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit? In OSM multiple values are separated by ; not /
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147162177
geozeisig (2024-02-11 07:09:54+00:00): Hello,
I have corrected beacon:type=VOR;DME to beacon:type=VOR/DME. It is now preferred to the old version. As it is one system with one antenna structure and one transmission container, it is preferred. The term is also frequently used in specialist literature.

Best regards

Dieter
gscholz (2024-02-11 06:28:12+00:00): Hi Muhammad ,
your recent edits have left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=3.20997&lat=6.67027&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147162238

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Andre68 (2024-02-07 20:42:59+00:00): Moin!
Kann es sein, dass das Schild falsch herum ist? Es müsste doch nach Norden zeigen, oder?
Gruß, Andre
Verirrt im Wald (2024-02-08 06:12:19+00:00): Moin,

danke für den Hinweis.

Ist geändert
ciao
user_17222985 (2024-02-07 07:03:10+00:00): https://storage.googleapis.com/svoi-upload/92/181264/%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BA-%D0%B4%D0%BE-%D1%80%D1%96%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B9%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%83%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F-%D0%B2%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%8C.pdf
AndyB_66 (2024-02-07 20:19:09+00:00): Błąd, w DŚU wskazano wariant 3.1 (jasnoniebieski), przebiegający wzdłuż istniejącej DK17. Twoja "kreska" nie pokrywa się nawet z żadnym z proponowanych wariantów - na jakiej podstawie ją więc narysowałeś?
charl3s (2024-02-07 20:35:43+00:00): prywróciłem z danych osm stary przebieg. 
Nie spodziewałem się, że zmieniono przebieg. W takim razie wycifuję
AndyB_66 (2024-02-07 20:42:02+00:00): Usunąłem i naniosłem nowy przebieg
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-02-08 08:00:50+00:00): Thank you for your contribution. A road was crossing the stream. It's been fixed.
A8UWIASX3K (2024-02-11 04:33:35+00:00): done
Marek-M (2024-02-07 08:10:29+00:00): Cześć,

Dzięki za edycję. Proszę o używanie mniejszej ilości węzłów na liniach (szczególnie na liniach typu highway=*). Te linie są używane w nawigacjach i dodatkowe węzły na liniach, które można uprościć generują większą ilość obliczeń trasy. Okolicę parku trochę uprościłem usuwając ponad 40 węzłów z linii highway=* i wygląd na tym nie ucierpiał.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147164647

Wiem, że routingi w tym miejscu raczej nie będą często liczyły trasy ale informacja o zmniejszeniu ilości węzłów jest ważna dla całej mapy OSM.

Szczególne zagrożenie stanowią węzły bardzo blisko siebie, które zaznaczyłem na tym obrazku: 
https://i.imgur.com/gcNt9UL.png
xerlix (2024-02-07 08:36:28+00:00): Cześć,

Dziękuję, że zwróciłeś na to uwagę. Będę pamiętał przy następnych edycjach.
habi (2024-04-02 12:25:13+00:00): Ciao NicuTN

In thich changeset you've also changed the farmland https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1303420/history/2 to a *very* big building https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1303420/history/3
I undid this change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149478103

Additionally, I think it would be good if you add your company (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1247101811) with some more details instead of only an ALL CAPS name.
Do you have a website or phone number you could add, too?

Greetings,
habi
user_17222985 (2024-02-07 07:54:32+00:00): https://storage.googleapis.com/svoi-upload/92/181264/%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BA-%D0%B4%D0%BE-%D1%80%D1%96%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B9%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%83%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F-%D0%B2%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%8C.pdf
Udarian (2024-02-08 12:27:55+00:00): Quick question,
Is the atm added in this 1 atm for both Wells Fargo and Bank of America or does this represent 2 separate atm’s one Wells Fargo and the other Bank of America?
Happy mapping.
Udarian (2024-02-13 01:12:48+00:00): is it 1 or 2 atm's
Udarian (2024-03-30 00:31:47+00:00): Can you please respond, I would like to know if the node needs to split into two separate nodes or if other changes need to be made.
Argbjorn (2024-02-07 09:10:27+00:00): Don't break the geometry of buildings. I reverted this changeset. Please, contact me and I will explain what you are doing wrong.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147164599
wambacher (2024-02-10 09:41:47+00:00): Bea81 deleted.
Duplicate with wrong position. 
The correct node is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1094853553
Argbjorn (2024-02-07 09:10:22+00:00): Don't break the geometry of buildings. I reverted this changeset. Please, contact me and I will explain what you are doing wrong.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147164900
Glassman (2024-02-08 01:29:38+00:00): A couple of comments 1st - the track at Harbor Points Middle School you added a track tag to an element of a multipolygon. The actually multipolygon already has the appropriate tags. If you are not familiar with multipolygons they are a complex relations of polygons to describe a feature that has many parts. For example, a building with a open interior like an atrium. - I removed the tag.

2nd - the fountain can be made more like round object by selecting the outline, right click and select the circle icon. Give it a try. It will look much nicer.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147165229
user_17222985 (2024-02-07 08:20:49+00:00): https://storage.googleapis.com/svoi-upload/92/181264/%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BA-%D0%B4%D0%BE-%D1%80%D1%96%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B9%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%83%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F-%D0%B2%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%8C.pdf
flohoff (2024-02-08 10:18:03+00:00): Moin,
wenn due Gebäude in NRW Einzeichnest solltest du nicht Bing Sat Fotos nehmen sondern das ALKIS des landes NRW - Da sind die öffentlich eingemessenen Gebäude drin. Die sind in der Lagegenauigkeit viel besser als Bing.

Keep mapping

Flo
mini-me (2024-02-07 12:58:38+00:00): Пожалуйста, не надо в одном пакете  редактировать объекты в разных концах страны.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-07 08:40:27+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1080753825

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
empty_child (2024-02-07 09:28:02+00:00): Добрый день
Позвольте узнать, почему Transnistria оскорбительное название?
Русский Человек (2024-03-12 09:54:26+00:00): Добрый день.
Этот термин как оскорбление и был введён в оборот в 1989-92 гг. во время войны Молдовы против ПМР. Если кратко, то это претензия молдорумынских националистов на землю Приднестровья и повторение геноцида, совершённого румынами во время ВОВ при оккупации советских земель, на этот раз конкретно в Приднестровье.
empty_child (2024-03-12 10:21:41+00:00): Понял. Вы тогда если будете менять названия организаций, проверяйте, как они сами себя называют, чтобы не устраивать самодеятельность
Русский Человек (2024-03-16 08:42:02+00:00): Разумеется. Можете быть уверены, что ни одна организация, как-либо связанная с приднестровским государством, не использует оскорбительный термин в своём иноязычном названии. Правда, за частные конторы не отвечаю, но я такие объекты обычно и не исправляю.
ChrissW-R1 (2025-01-05 13:58:56+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/changeset/144241163
mavl (2024-02-23 18:52:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147818131, 147828921 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
Argbjorn (2024-02-07 09:10:13+00:00): Don't break the geometry of buildings. I reverted this changeset. Please, contact me and I will explain what you are doing wrong.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147165839
Enock4seth (2024-02-07 17:27:21+00:00): Thanks for mapping! "added bread factory" would have been a better changeset comment than just some hashtag that doesn't really say much to yourself and other mappers :),  read about using Good changeset  comments at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Happy mapping!
kapazao (2024-02-09 12:18:05+00:00): Please check the map before adding an element that exists.
Regards
tux67 (2024-02-07 14:12:49+00:00): Hallo Autohaus Heinrich Senden GmbH,
access=yes für den Defi würde heissen , daß jedermann zu jeder Zeit darauf zugreifen kann?
War das so gemeint?
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147166352
Arlo James Barnes (2024-04-04 06:51:02+00:00): thx
richlv (2024-02-07 12:40:37+00:00): Liels paldies par kartes papildināšanu. Nedaudz pielaboju darba laiku, lai tas atbilstu informācijas strukturēšanas prasībām.
user_17222985 (2024-02-07 09:15:33+00:00): https://storage.googleapis.com/svoi-upload/92/181264/%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BA-%D0%B4%D0%BE-%D1%80%D1%96%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B9%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%83%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F-%D0%B2%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%8C.pdf
user_17222985 (2024-02-07 09:16:09+00:00): also highway's
rskedgell (2024-03-07 10:13:11+00:00): You appear to have tagged the link between carriageways on the A45  as foot=no in response to a StreetComplete task asking "Are pedestrians forbidden to walk on this road here?"

I have checked the available Bing Streetside and/or Mapillary imagery for evidence that there really is a (signed) pedestrian prohibition here. I cannot see any TSRGD diagram 625.1 "pedestrians prohibited" signs on the imagery, so do not believe that a prohibition exists and have therefore reverted your edit.

The wiki states that access tags reflect legal access. Subjective opinions about whether it would be pleasant, a good idea, safe, etc. for a particular transport mode are not relevant to legal access.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot

As real pedestrian prohibitions on public roads other than those tagged as highway=motorway or motorroad=yes in the UK are quite rare and are always signed, this quest is probably better left disabled.
qqii (2024-03-07 11:37:13+00:00): Thanks for the tip! I've disabled the quest.
Rashid86 (2024-04-17 21:26:23+00:00): Но тут нет водоема, и поля давно не обрабатывают...может тут должно быть landuse=farmland ?
evgeniyakz (2024-07-22 07:25:26+00:00): На карте позырил , затоплено прилично . пересыхающий пруд ?
gendy54 (2024-02-11 11:23:13+00:00): Pour les commentaires de changeset: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Faites_de_bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147167817
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-07 09:51:01+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Szpitalna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325284708
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325285046

"Kromera":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325284748
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325284760
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1218691493

"Bochniewicza":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325332144
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325332619
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325332762
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325332776
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1093604234
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153118984
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153118991
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153871060
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153871066

"Długoszowskich":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537811334

"Półanki":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1218085660

"Harta":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1218691498

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Langlaeufer (2024-02-16 17:18:56+00:00): Auch unbehauenes Kopfsteinpflaster ist eine feste Decke und damit eigentlich grade1. Aber da es eine Straße ist und auch Surface erfasst ist, ist die Grade-Angabe eh überflüssig
Grüße Langläufer
user_17222985 (2024-02-07 09:56:00+00:00): https://storage.googleapis.com/svoi-upload/92/181264/%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BA-%D0%B4%D0%BE-%D1%80%D1%96%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B9%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%83%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F-%D0%B2%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%8C.pdf
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-08 07:39:42+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147204757
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-02 20:25:47+00:00): Hello!

You used
smoking=non
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11594218876/history

Have you maybe meant
smoking=no
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Negreheb (2024-02-29 11:18:00+00:00): Hey nandan10, cool you are also joining the OSM community. It was raised in the global chat that you are creating changesets (CS) just commented with "testing". Can you please use a more desribing name - here for example "Changed roundabout from motorway to service" so its easy to follow and check. 

Now on this CS: You demoted the motorway to service and checking with the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice it seems wrong unfortunately. Can you tell us why you did that? 

Best regards
nandan10 (2024-02-29 12:17:35+00:00): I was just testing the foot mode and somewhat, the map was not correctly describing the way from central avenue to iitdelhi main road.
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-08 07:39:03+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147204735
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-08 07:38:51+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147204722
MichS (2024-02-08 06:15:38+00:00): Hallo,

danke für die Bearbeitung.
Die Öffnungszeiten wie hier beschreiben eintagen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

MFG
GinaroZ (2024-07-24 22:45:17+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159981713 definitely one way, as you surely must be able to exit from the cycle path there?
CycleAlex (2024-07-25 01:22:07+00:00): Officially at least, yes. There’s ahead only signs on the cycle signals. You could wait for a gap in traffic anyway, but probably best not to map that IMO
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-07 11:00:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/687236996
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/687286330

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ivanbranco (2025-07-14 11:11:30+00:00): Ciao Mose53,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/862771522/

come mai questo edificio ha altezza=0? Un errore?

grazie e buon mapping
pantufla (2024-02-27 16:34:50+00:00): Hola. Perdona pero veo que añades piscinas donde ya hay otras agregadas desde hace más de 9 meses. Estoy intentando corregir pero veo que sigues haciendo esto. No sé si es por algún error del editor que no se ve la que estaba antes?
angys (2024-02-07 17:40:51+00:00): Please dont tag residential road for apartment road... should be service road. Residential road is used for Taman open circuit road that normally has 2 ways and space for roadside parking
dooley (2024-02-07 11:54:22+00:00): Hallo jabberwooky.

Magst du an die Waschanlage noch genauere Tags dranpappen? Schau mal im Wiki nach. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=car%20wash?uselang=de
NieWnen (2024-02-07 20:02:27+00:00): Coś w niektórych miejscach poszło nie tak w tej relacji. 
Szlak rowerowy raczej nie powinien przebiegać po chodnikach/przejściach dla pieszych (chyba, że nie ma wyboru).

Np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17162392#map=19/52.14013/20.71825
albo 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17162392#map=19/52.13044/20.80092
arjunaraoc (2024-03-05 10:20:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my improvment: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148243417
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147172215
silversurfer83 (2024-02-07 22:01:19+00:00): "der heißt wirklich so" ist keine Quelle
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147173045
lberges (2024-02-08 04:03:33+00:00): https://www.tannengrundhof.de/der-tannengrundhof
silversurfer83 (2024-02-08 05:36:43+00:00): Danke
silversurfer83 (2024-02-07 20:40:26+00:00): Gude :)

auf dem Luftbild sieht das hier aus wie ein "normaler" Waldweg. Sehe ich das richtig?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147173460
flohoff (2024-02-08 10:15:35+00:00): Moin,
vor allem passt da wenn einiges jetzt nicht am tagging. 1.5m breite kann kein Track sein sein. sand + grade5  ist auch - aehm - seltsam - und mich würde wundern wenn da ein Zeichen 250 mitten im Wald steht das das motor_vehicle=no rechtfertigt.

Flo
silversurfer83 (2024-02-08 10:40:14+00:00): Moin Flo :)

da user HoneyWish erst 23 CS auf dem Konto hat, habe ich mit einer simplen Frage angefangen um dann ggf. in die Feinheiten einzusteigen.
Ich hoffe ja, dass wir demnächst eine Antwort auf meine Frage erhalten um dieses merkwürdige Konstrukt zu entschlüsseln.

Cheers
silversurfer83