piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Szymiii (2023-11-28 06:14:46+00:00): Nie jestem przekonany do tej zasady. Wszak dlatego też na OpenRailwayMap pojawiają się całe szprychy, dlatego we Wrocławiu - mimo braku projektu - od wielu lat wisi północna obwodnica śródmiejska, dlatego w Jeleniej Górze - w karkołomny sposób - zaznaczony jest jeden z wariantów obwodnicy w ciągu przedłużenia al. Solidarności, dlatego w Łodzi pozaznaczane są planowane drogi, które - w dodatku - w najbliższym czasie nie powstaną a wynikają wyłącznie z rezerw.

Co więcej - usuwając zmiany użytkownika nie zastosowałeś się do jednej z zasad OSM, żeby najpierw wejść w kontakt z autorem, a nie odgórnie - niczym samozwańczy strażnik-szeryf usuwasz dane.
eerib (2023-11-26 21:21:15+00:00): This change was as a result of a private message from user Arminal that asked about visibility of the trail/launch for "community and safety reasons".

The changes made include:

- Marking the trail as informal=yes as it is an unofficial trail.

- Moving the free flying tags and launch name from the viewpoint node to the grassland landuse area.

I believe these changes are consistent with OSM policies and will result in visibility changes in the most popular outdoor applications (AllTrails and Gaia).
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-27 05:50:05+00:00): note that person being reverted ignored changeset comments, this reverts were also discussed in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-27 05:50:08+00:00): note that person being reverted ignored changeset comments, this reverts were also discussed in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-27 05:50:11+00:00): note that person being reverted ignored changeset comments, this reverts were also discussed in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878
Szymiii (2023-11-27 13:53:20+00:00): Zamiast usuwać dane z mapy proponuję zerknąć na stan zaawansowania prac. Warianty są w trakcie procedowania, zamieszczone zgodnie z danymi GDDKiA. Zamiast usuwać drogę proponowałbym rozpocząć dyskusję, spojrzeć na opis etc. źródło: https://a4-s5-stesr.pl/index.php/orientacja/
maraf24 (2023-11-27 22:40:30+00:00): W OSM nie mapujemy przyszłości, poza określonymi wyjątkami. Warianty do nich nie należą.
Szymiii (2023-11-28 06:15:07+00:00): Nie jestem przekonany do tej zasady. Wszak dlatego też na OpenRailwayMap pojawiają się całe szprychy, dlatego we Wrocławiu - mimo braku projektu - od wielu lat wisi północna obwodnica śródmiejska, dlatego w Jeleniej Górze - w karkołomny sposób - zaznaczony jest jeden z wariantów obwodnicy w ciągu przedłużenia al. Solidarności, dlatego w Łodzi pozaznaczane są planowane drogi, które - w dodatku - w najbliższym czasie nie powstaną a wynikają wyłącznie z rezerw.

Co więcej - usuwając zmiany użytkownika nie zastosowałeś się do jednej z zasad OSM, żeby najpierw wejść w kontakt z autorem, a nie odgórnie - niczym samozwańczy strażnik-szeryf usuwasz dane
jfd553 (2023-12-17 21:36:46+00:00): Merci pour la mise à jour!
Frédéric Brière (2023-12-21 02:19:46+00:00): Ça m'a fait plaisir!  ☺
Nachtspazz (2023-11-26 22:45:56+00:00): Sorry, comment ging verloren. Sollte "Wege und Pfade Illerrieden in Richtung Dorndorf" sein.
Langlaeufer (2023-11-27 06:55:51+00:00): Hi,

B 248 ist sicherlich kein richtiger Name, oder?
wie wäre es mit old_ref=B 248 ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144484983
Langlaeufer (2023-11-27 07:26:39+00:00): Wurde schon erledigt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144484983
user_5359 (2023-11-27 09:26:13+00:00): Hallo! Bitte sieh Dir nochmal den Weg https://www.osm.org/way/376743730/history an. Was ist die Bedeutung von dem Tag yes = no?
vasony (2023-12-23 17:31:01+00:00): Szerintem ez egyértelműen táblahiba, én visszaírnám Kurucok útjára.
bordaben (2023-12-30 19:00:07+00:00): Szia!

Egyetértek, de legalább két táblán is kint volt, és azt gondolná az ember, hogy ha hibás, akkor nem rakják ki. Szerintem is hülyeség az útja út kifejezés. Ha így is úgy gondolod, hogy írjam vissza, akkor szívesen megteszem. 

Üdv.
Bence
bkil (2023-12-30 20:29:58+00:00): Valamilyen címkében jó volna jelölni a terepen olvasható szöveget.
vasony (2023-12-31 17:38:23+00:00): pl:
If a sign is obviously in error, use not:name=* to prevent mappers without local knowledge from propagating the error in OpenStreetMap.
Langlaeufer (2023-11-27 06:54:10+00:00): Hallo Mangobonbon,
wird an der Straße noch gebaut? Das hängt noch ein construction=yes drann.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144485128
Mangobonbon (2023-11-27 09:53:30+00:00): Ich bin gestern dran vorbei gefahren. Da waren Bagger zu Werke. Die Verbindung der Straße am Südende wurde bereits komplett gekappt.
Langlaeufer (2023-11-27 10:50:57+00:00): Ich vermute mal das hier betroffene alte Trassenstück wird komplett zurückgebaut.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144485128
Mangobonbon (2023-11-27 10:58:09+00:00): Denke ich auch. Das nördliche Stück scheinte mir aber anders. Da wurde neue Kreuzung angelegt. Auch die Straße bis zum Wald scheinte mir neu asphaltiert und neue Straßenpfosten wurden auch gesetzt.
IraGersh (2023-11-26 22:19:37+00:00): This should be square. Can I access that function to make it square from a phone? I took a photo. Can I add the photo?
MxxCon (2023-11-26 22:41:35+00:00): If you use Android phone, there's app called Vespucci. It is a little bit clunky and awkward to use, but it does have "make square" functionality.
If you use iPhone, I think GoMap!! app can make things square as well.
IraGersh (2023-11-27 00:10:07+00:00): I was able to edit with Vespucci with the help of the tutorial on YouTube.I never found the square function. I eliminated the attachment of the crosswalk to the stairs and using esri imaging in the winter I was able to better locate the stairs, the crosswalk, and the monument. I believe.
IraGersh (2023-11-27 00:12:39+00:00): I took a wonderful photo of the stairs and statue and a few more of the crosswalk. No clue how to attach.
MxxCon (2023-11-27 00:39:21+00:00): Changesets and OSM in general have no way to upload and host images.
if you can post it on slack to explain what you are referring to.
zuri8 (2023-11-26 22:24:31+00:00): Ulica Marinka Madžgalja ne postoji. Pogledaj https://a3.geosrbija.rs/
Solecar (2023-11-28 22:42:42+00:00): @zuri8
Ulica Marinka Madzgalja postoji. Potraži je na zvaničnom spisku ulica https://zis.beograd.gov.rs/
hk51 (2023-11-28 13:00:28+00:00): wieso wurde das Gebäude 682148261 gelöscht ?
Olaf der Mapper (2023-11-28 19:56:20+00:00): Siehe Kommentar von opendcc vom 6. Nov um 4:30 Uhr:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143655152
tyfi (2023-11-26 21:16:02+00:00): MO A is a state-maintained asphalt road.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-26 21:20:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11378492583
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/797861677

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Orla":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11378492592
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11378492649

"Sowia":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11378492606

"Kanarkowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11378493899

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Myazyk (2023-11-29 09:29:12+00:00): Файна робота
Shyshka (2023-11-29 22:41:17+00:00): дякую)
Filip009 (2023-11-29 13:18:26+00:00): Ahoj, smerovníky sa snažíme umiestňovať na miesto, kde sa nachádzajú aj v realite. To, že sú niektoré v strede cesty znamenalo, že boli importované a nebolo jasné, kde sa nachádzajú. Keď ale vieš, kde sa presne nachádza, je potrebné cesty od bodu odpojiť, tak aby ostala zachovaná história a bod umiestniť na správne miesto, kde sa smerovník v realite nachádza.
bronto (2023-11-29 14:26:47+00:00): Aha, OK. Vďaka. To isté si vlastne urobil i so smerovníkom "Zobor", že nie je na cestičke už, ale vedľa. Ďakujem, budem vedieť.
Filip009 (2023-11-29 14:41:46+00:00): Hej presne, ale spravil som to tak, aby história ostala zachovaná. Takže som ho vybral z tých ciest.
george1201 (2023-12-01 21:51:34+00:00): Laut Website ist raumobil in der Nr. 19. Position ist richtig, Housnumber-Tag aber falsch (16 statt 19).
jaljones (2023-12-02 14:40:44+00:00): oh ja, bin wohl beim tippen verrutscht, danke. Wurde korrigiert #144693876
Polarbear (2023-12-22 19:54:30+00:00): Lieber User 'übung1',
bitte bemühe dich um aussagekräftige Changeset-Kommentare, damit die anderen Beitragenden in OSM deine Absichten erkennen können. 
Wenn du Objekte löschst, begründe das bitte.
Die Wiederholung des Wortes Topologie ist leider nichtssagend. 
Hier findest du Hinweise dazu:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Bitte gib auch die Quelle deiner Änderungen an. Mülleimer sind auf dem Luftbild kaum zu erkennen.
arjunaraoc (2024-01-09 11:30:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my update: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146063134
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144486414
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-30 19:33:50+00:00): Jakie jest źródło /podstawa dla tej edycji?

Patrz np. https://warszawa.wyborcza.pl/warszawa/7,54420,25028308,amfiteatr-na-bemowie-nie-nosi-juz-imienia-michaela-jacksona.html
lucumon (2024-01-03 17:04:23+00:00): Hi! I understand that the height was wrongly added (was in mm instead of m). Still, I think that instead of deleting useful information that could later be unrecoverable, you could have simply corrected the error, or warn me with a comment in order to fix it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144486658
one_half_3544 (2024-03-22 09:14:04+00:00): Hi!

Let's leave the name:ru intact - those objects were renamed in name/name:tj only.

Also, let's have only the current name in the name tag - the old one should go to the old_name(:tj)
ChristianB77 (2024-10-13 20:15:52+00:00): The official name changes are in all languages. Like Bombay to Mumbai... OSM follows national governments and their laws, however annoying it is to keep changing names. The government clearly stated this as they released the new names in both their Russian and Tajik spellings. https://www.takali.org/placename-changes
one_half_3544 (2024-10-14 10:47:31+00:00): But Tajik government can only change Tajik names, not the Russian ones )
puchaczowsky (2023-11-27 21:08:42+00:00): czemu usunąłeś te plany? działki pod tę drogę są cały czas wyznaczone i niezabudowane
maraf24 (2023-11-27 22:38:21+00:00): Zapoznaj się z warunkami umieszczania w OSM dróg planowanych.
PedroMTG13 (2023-12-05 10:38:02+00:00): Diogo, eu acho que a linha Ermesinde (REN)-Amieira (16758452) já não existe na area que atravessa a Cirvcunvalação. Meses atrás retiraram uma das torres de alta tensão, provavelmente passou a ser subterrâneo.
pitfire (2023-11-27 12:39:29+00:00): Hi os-emmer,
betr.: Voltastraße (1227038355, v1)
Die Eisenbahntrasse ist bereits Brücke und (layer=1)
Entweder den unteren Weg als Tunnel oder den oberen Weg als Brücke zu kennzeichnen, aber nicht beides. 
VG pitfire
os-emmer (2023-11-27 18:26:57+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Das habe ich grade angepasst.
tyfi (2023-11-26 22:23:10+00:00): The ways here didn't even have a ref tag
tyfi (2023-11-26 22:26:59+00:00): These #MapWithAI changesets are something. They seem to be taking the name from the adjacent highways?
tyfi (2023-11-26 22:28:06+00:00): Or maybe they're trying to match edges in a dataset like TIGER, but even then it would be easy to check if that thing already exists in OSM in a certain proximity...
tyfi (2023-11-26 22:31:11+00:00): Previously: 144481130
tyfi (2023-11-26 22:31:28+00:00): Next: 144487469
tyfi (2023-11-26 22:31:34+00:00): Previous: 144487364
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-26 22:40:39+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11378562551

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
feilik (2023-11-26 22:55:00+00:00): Dziękuję za notkę i poprawki :)
Pozdrawiam.
NorthCrab (2023-11-26 22:58:14+00:00): :-)
tyfi (2023-11-26 22:46:56+00:00): Note to self: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1DZ1
eggie (2023-11-27 08:32:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Wanneer een bedrijf verdwijnt dan svp in het vervolg het adres intact laten. Dus alleen de bedrijfsinfo verwijderen. Ik pas wat aan. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
ZeLonewolf (2023-11-29 10:01:00+00:00): I reverted this change because these streets are posted as private access roads.  Please do not change them back without community discussion.  Ref/ DWG ticket #2023112810000241

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144581288
ZeLonewolf (2023-11-29 10:05:43+00:00): This is private property as listed in the city of Newport GIS.  It is posted "NO TRESPASSING".
Please do not change this road back. I am not familiar with "Axios GIS" but if it's an OdBL-compatible data source, please document it here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rhode_Island

Link below to City of Newport's official GIS site:
https://newportri.mapgeo.io/datasets/property?abuttersDistance=200&latlng=41.479467%2C-71.298528&previewId=5907&zoom=18
StreetSurveyor (2023-11-29 10:39:18+00:00): That is the same GIS site. This portion doesn’t show private like others do (Ocean Lawn) for example.
ZeLonewolf (2023-11-29 10:46:34+00:00): The road is within the parcel boundaries of private property.
ZeLonewolf (2023-11-29 10:48:03+00:00): If you look carefully, you'll notice that between 29 and 30 Cliff Avenue, the road crosses into private property.  North of that location it's outside the property boundaries.
jgruca (2023-11-27 15:58:00+00:00): This road is planned to reopen on Dec. 1. See: https://www.wdm.iowa.gov/government/parks-recreation/construction-updates#8th%20street%20reconstruction
Xvtn (2023-12-13 23:15:06+00:00): Looks great. Thanks for your contributions!! I also tidied up a couple of nearby roads.
AjBelnuovo (2024-01-28 23:02:00+00:00): Qual é a fonte do nome destas vias ?
Xvtn (2023-12-13 23:10:55+00:00): Looks good. Thanks for your contributions!
Andrea Musuruane (2023-11-29 15:48:15+00:00): Ciao. La modifica a Torre Balfredo non mi sembra corretta. E' una localita' separata da Ivrea, quindi non puo' essere un place=suburb. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144488857
Matt_ (2023-11-27 01:27:36+00:00): Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_National_Inventory_of_Dams
Matt_ (2023-11-27 01:30:36+00:00): And also: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/42447
OptikalCrow (2023-12-04 18:01:43+00:00): Hey, just so you know, I intentionally left off crossing:markings from this crossing (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9241020432) as from aerial imagery it looks like the road got repaved sometime between Bing's image capture and the Virginia state imagery capture. I put a fixme on the node and way to make sure someone knew about this.

I haven't had a chance to survey it yet, but please do not re-add crossing:markings unless you can verify with a ground survey whether or not the crossing got repainted. I know iD likes to yell and makes it easy to add, but there was a reason it was missing from this crossing.

I've also been trying to specify what type of markings there are in crossing:markings, so if you come across one feel free to add that extra detail from imagery instead of just adding "crossing:markings=yes"
tyfi (2023-11-27 02:04:37+00:00): Missouri
MxxCon (2023-11-27 05:58:30+00:00): Hello.
Are you basing these edits on the map image on their website?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144490496
SteveKHayes (2023-11-27 12:50:45+00:00): hello, yes, using the cemetery map as a basis, and using changes in row array and wheee possible, the section wayfinding signs as borders. I will be back in the cemetery later in December and plan to gps trace the specific rows where sections change
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144490496
MxxCon (2023-11-27 20:36:31+00:00): I think some of the labels on their map are the names of roads/paths, not just sections
SteveKHayes (2023-11-27 23:09:40+00:00): possibly, but, based on my genealogy work in that cemetery, i’ve mapped only the section names, which includes those named with “rows” and the anne seton section - which are used in grave locations. more precision is needed to map the “terrace” locations found in many of the sections. 

if you are interested in seeing the sections referenced. you can search by “plot” (using the section name) and see corresponding gravesites in those sections


www.findagrave.com/cemetery/64166/memorial-search?firstname=&middlename=&lastname=&cemeteryName=Holy+Cross+Cemetery&birthyear=&birthyearfilter=&deathyear=&deathyearfilter=&memorialid=&mcid=&linkedToName=&datefilter=&orderby=r&plot=
MxxCon (2023-11-27 23:12:50+00:00): Since you'll be there in person, perhaps their office has a more detailed map from which many of the missing details could be added. 👍
SteveKHayes (2023-11-27 23:23:01+00:00): great idea! thanks for all the work you do in mapping bklyn 
-Steve
tyfi (2023-11-27 02:29:16+00:00): Also added stop signs at either end.
tyfi (2023-11-27 02:30:37+00:00): Whelp, missed the eastern part of it. Next changeset will address this.
Emilius123 (2023-11-27 02:42:45+00:00): Egal, wie ich das hier geschafft habe.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144490668
julcnx (2024-04-24 08:51:34+00:00): Hey, thank you for your contributions! I noticed you've marked some roads as 'living_street.' One tip for future edits: you should tag these as 'highway=residential' instead. This is because there aren't any rules in Thailand that specifically lower speed limits or give pedestrians priority in residential areas.
You can read more about this on the Thailand wiki. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Cheers
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Urban_and_Local_Road_wide_enough_for_motor_cars
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144490858
Baloo Uriza (2023-11-30 19:13:20+00:00): Where are you getting these names from?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144490938
oresmiticapt (2023-11-27 06:30:22+00:00): This should have been only a couple miles wide, not sure why the change rectangle is way larger.
exarkun (2023-11-29 19:05:16+00:00): Hi,
die Frage und Anmerkung aus https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144532803 bezieht sich auch auf Deine anderen Änderungen, wie z.B. hier

exarkun
Nakaner (2024-05-03 09:20:20+00:00): Ich habe soeben alle Änderungen dieses Benutzers, bei denen es um geplante Vorhaben geht, rückgängig gemacht.
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-22 15:35:35+00:00): Please don't put the ref in names.  "name=State Highway 34" is not correct, but "ref=OK 34, noname=yes" would be.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144491449
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-22 15:28:30+00:00): Don't abbreviate refs, especially when they were right the first time.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144491752
tyfi (2023-11-30 03:31:36+00:00): correction: it's Route O and U.S. 60
tyfi (2023-11-30 03:32:10+00:00): wow, double correction: it's route M and U.S. 60
citrula (2023-11-28 02:51:37+00:00): Hi, you should make sure to manually validate buildings from MapWithAI/Rapid - they are often incorrect and need to be fixed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144493043
ronaa11 (2023-11-28 03:13:59+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. I will keep a closer eye on this in the future.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144493043
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:24:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174064933 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18849
tyfi (2023-11-27 05:37:59+00:00): There was a weird fork-like feature on the county road.
mavl (2023-11-27 14:06:01+00:00): Здравствуйте. Дом культуры обозначается тегом amenity=community_centre.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre  
  
Также в названии слова "дом культуры", скорее всего, с маленькой буквы.
MxxCon (2023-11-28 04:26:27+00:00): Hello.
Generally it's best to try to update the existing feature into the current state rather than delete/create new. Updating the existing feature preserves its history which might be useful to refer to in the future.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144494023
Mertmert (2023-11-29 21:43:18+00:00): Hey MxxCon!

I 100% appreciate that! I am currently extracting and preparing a record of all of the assets mapped by our interns on OpenStreetMap. For some reason, the way-IDs of this and a few other features (around 14-17) appear as line feature types after exporting them, despite all being areas/polygons. I've sought to troubleshoot this, but in the absence of a better solution I am simply re-mapping this smaller group of features and creating new way-ids that can be properly identified as areas/polygons in future exports. I will only be doing this for features mapped by our interns, and only to the aforementioned number of features that are exported erroneously. Thank you for your concern!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144494023
arjunaraoc (2024-01-07 10:48:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144494178
mavl (2023-11-27 14:12:02+00:00): Здравствуйте. На этой развязке чуть ли не каждые две недели меняется схема проезда. Так что можно ничего не менять, пока не закончится реконструкция дороги.
literan (2023-11-27 16:44:46+00:00): Здравствуйте. ок.
CoreForce (2023-11-27 11:59:03+00:00): Das passt so ganz genau, Vielen Dank!
habi (2023-11-27 13:01:51+00:00): Bittegärngscheh!
eggie (2023-11-27 10:10:46+00:00): Dag toposheep
name	ChargePoint is niet correct... geen nametag gebruiken om iets te beschrijven. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

bicycle=yes – electric bikes (also called pedelec) can be charged

en dan motor_vehicle=no

Dan is het duidelijk op de fietskaarten.
Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-11-27 10:13:57+00:00): ... en die andere toevoeging
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcharge_point

.. doet niets op de kaart. Denk beter amenity=charging_station gebruiken.
Dan wellicht motor_vehicle=yes
bicycle=no
eggie (2023-11-27 10:14:51+00:00): en niet name=  .. alleen operator voor het bedrijf.
topoSheep (2023-11-27 20:28:35+00:00): Beste Eggie,

ik heb het aan gepast
mvg
TS
eggie (2023-11-27 20:31:33+00:00): Top...