piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Kovoschiz (2026-03-11 18:46:47+00:00): 

OSM 101: Don't align `building=` with the roof in imagery (which is further complicated on hillside with more expected distortion at base)
You made them the worst, on top of the `=tertiary`
NeisBot (2026-03-11 17:17:29+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13638690536 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Car rental office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-19 17:33:49+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122451
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
Kovoschiz (2026-03-11 18:10:14+00:00): OSM 101: Don't align `building=` with the roof in imagery (which is further complicated on hillside with more expected distortion at base) 
You made it them the worst, on top of the `=tertiary`
NeisBot (2026-03-11 17:17:39+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13638690533 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Rodinný podnik"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-19 17:33:50+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122453
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
bxl-forever (2026-03-11 16:56:30+00:00): Bedankt… mar "Hoogblokweg - Voetweg 50 (huidige naam Kerkstraat)" is geen geldige naam voor een weg.

Het is het een of het ander, maar men kan ze niet combineren.
Joske1020 (2026-03-15 14:43:52+00:00): nog iets @WOW3020
ik denk dat je best even https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=Beginners%27_guide leest, aangezien je nog commits hebt gemaakt die wat eigenaardig zijn.
Joske1020 (2026-03-15 14:44:40+00:00): wat je wel kon doen was een note=* toevoegen, of was:name=* .
Frans S (2026-03-11 15:46:34+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179709748
ScottWalkerAU (2026-03-13 00:35:50+00:00): Hiya, you should add the street name along with the house number (other address fields are often unnecessary, though)
thebeastmodo1 (2026-03-13 16:20:05+00:00): ok
NxPFoto (2026-03-11 16:00:30+00:00): Ich hatte vergessen die Quelle abzuändern. Als Grundlage für diesen Änderungssatz diente das Luftbild "Bayern DOP 40"
NeisBot (2026-03-11 17:18:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13285879267 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Skalitzky Culvert"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-19 17:33:52+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122456
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-18 05:42:49+00:00): no, napisałem mejla :)

Attachment: 1757538057305.jpg
From: Mateusz Konieczny
To: rowery@zdmk.krakow.pl
Subject: Czemu wybudowana droga dla rowerów nie jest oznakowana jako droga dla rowerów (przy Giedroycia od strony południowej)
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 23:03:05 +0200

odcinek został utwardzony (asfalt + kostka brukowa), ale oznakowanie jako
droga dla rowerów nie obejmuje tego odcinka
LordGarySugar (2026-03-12 17:46:57+00:00): Hey, it's not correct to delete these building parts here. As part of the simple 3D buildings schema, a building polygon needs to be completely covered by building parts, even if those building parts have the same building:levels tagged as the surrounding building. So for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946524532 wasn't unecessary or duplicative, but is required for representing the building correctly in 3D. You should also not remove tags like roof:shape and building:colour from building parts where they are the same as the surrounding building polygon's tags - while renderers like F4 assume building parts have the same properties as their surrounding building, it is actually helpful to explicitly place these tags on each building part.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings - "The entire building outline should be filled with building:part=* areas, tagged with their respective height and other attributes."

Thanks.
Herr Bause (2026-03-12 18:54:37+00:00): Servus,
welches Gebäude meinst du genau? Dein Link ist leer
Herr Bause (2026-03-12 19:05:23+00:00): Hab mir das Wiki angesehe, da steht es anderst
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building:part

"Benutzte building:part=yes für Gebäudeteile, die nur andere Gebäudeattribute haben als das Gesamtgebäude (z.B. building:levels=*, height=*, building:min_level=*)."
LordGarySugar (2026-03-12 21:28:17+00:00): I mean for example this building, where it is only partially covered by building parts now https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/921508463. In some 3D renderers, the left hand side of the building will not be rendered, because it is not covered by a building part.

I think you are misinterpreting the part of the wiki that you quoted - it says that you should use the tag building:part=yes for building parts that have the same function as the surrounding building, so in this case building=apartments and the parts within are tagged building:part=yes. It does not say that if the attributes of a part of the building are the same as the surrounding building that no building part is necessary.

The wiki page should make it clear that the whole footprint of a building should be covered with building parts, according to the Simple 3D Buildings schema. I will try to get someone to update the German page. The English page says this: 

"Common mistakes:
Missing parts: If a building's parts cover only part of the building outline, the remainder of the building may not be visible in a standard-compliant 3D renderer."

Hopefully that is clear. Fröhliche Mappierung!
Herr Bause (2026-03-13 08:19:49+00:00): Servus,
Also F4 rendert das auch so richtig.
Ich bleibe bei meiner Meinung das man die Eigenschaften des Gebäudeumriss nicht noch zusätzlich als Buildigpart mappen muss.
Aber es schadet auch nichts, ich werde die von mir gelöschten Buildingparts in den nächsten Tagen wieder herstellen.
Ok ?

Grüße
Herr Bause (2026-03-13 08:30:33+00:00): "Common mistakes:
Missing parts: If a building's parts cover only part of the building outline, the remainder of the building may not be visible in a standard-compliant 3D renderer."
Wenn Building_parts über das Gebäude hinausragen wird das gesamte Gebäude nicht gerendert. Kann es sein dass die Aussage dass meint ?? In F4 ist es zumindest so.

Werde die building_parts natürlich trotzdem wieder herstellen ;-)

Grüße
Herr Bause (2026-03-13 16:29:43+00:00): So,
sollte wieder passen.

Wie ist es dann z.B mit der Gebäudefarbe kommt die dann zusätzlich zum Gebäude auch an die building_parts?
Grüße
LordGarySugar (2026-04-24 02:44:08+00:00): Hi, sorry for the delay. If building:colour is tagged on the building, we can assume that it applies to all building parts, so it doesn't need to be added to each building part. When it comes to building:levels, you must tag that on all building parts, even if it is the same as the surrounding building=. I hope you also got some clear answers on the forum thread. Danke für dein Verständnis :)
NeisBot (2026-03-11 17:18:53+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/8187954752 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Shipping center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-19 17:33:53+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122458
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
gurglypipe (2026-03-11 16:30:47+00:00): Hiya, are you sure the whole of Cavendish Dock Road should be highway=service? The first portion of it accesses an industrial estate, and has a fairly significant junction with the A5087, and pavements.
Halfix (2026-03-12 07:11:18+00:00): Hi, die Höchstgeschwindigkeit war hier über das Attribut maxspeed:type (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:maxspeed Abschnitt "Implizite Höchstgeschwindigkeit"), bereits korrekt gesetzt, so dass dein neuer Eintrag komplett redundant ist. Vielleicht eine gute Gelegenheit das Reverten von Changesets zu lernen/üben :-) Geht sehr einfach über https://revert.monicz.dev 
Gruß Gerhard (Halfix)
felipeeugenio (2026-03-11 18:42:51+00:00): Hola Andrés. Ojo con esto, duplicaste la clinica con un hospital.
Yo lo arreglo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179711940
aceman444 (2026-05-10 15:22:20+00:00): Zdravim, tato zmena nevyzera dobre. Preco vymazavate highway=traffic_signals? Bolo to spravne, auta tam maju semafor. Aj chodci (crossing=traffic_signals).
A zmena crossing_ref=zebra na crossing:markings=zebra to je kozmeticka uprava, ktora nic neriesi a nie je v zadani Maproulette.
aceman444 (2026-05-10 15:26:13+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#Traffic_signals_for_pedestrians
Dimitar155 (2026-03-12 18:12:27+00:00): Здравей Боби, Може ли да преместиш салона в сградата в която се намира? В момента се намира на средата на улицата.
sykul (2026-03-11 17:48:27+00:00): Très bien.
mueschel (2026-03-12 11:40:23+00:00): Please stop creating new accounts and importing your POIs one-by-one. Please read and obey the guidelines for imports and professional editing:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/6/62/Organised_Editing_Guidelines.pdf
javbw (2026-04-08 21:33:05+00:00): when adding ways, make sure to connect them. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1487728926/history#map=19/36.276104/139.430260

This way overlaps the sidewalk, but is not connected. this means there is no way go from the path to the sidewalk. Please connect the paths and roads properly - good luck mapping!
MappingMore (2026-03-13 08:49:10+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179797049
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Probelnijs (2026-05-13 08:27:35+00:00): Hoi TekkoTaks, hetzelfde geldt voor deze wijzigingenset... (Zie comment in wijzigingenset 179723385)
Yareckt (2026-07-20 01:10:22+00:00): Hallo Redb1rd,
bin an der Ecke kürzlich vorbeigelaufen, wollte die Öffnungszeiten von dem Laden eintragen aber habe ihn nicht gefunden. Was für eine Art von Laden ist es? Also ist es z.B. ein Auto, ein Geschäft in dem Eckhaus, ein Verkaufsstand, ... Ist das vlt. ein Laden der nur manchmal an dem Ort ist? Wenn er nicht in dem Haus ist, weist du noc zu welcher Zeit er ungefähr da war als du ihn gesehen hast, damit nochmal wer vorbeischaeun kann wann er normalerweise da ist?
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
VLD322 (2026-03-12 00:17:29+00:00): Added pedestrian infrastructure and crossings.
NeisBot (2026-03-11 17:19:10+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13634724282 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tattoo shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-19 17:33:54+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/180122439
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Negreheb (2026-03-12 08:12:02+00:00): Servus Wikiscout, wegen der Postbox unten, steht da wirklich freifliegend auf einer Säule oder so? Weil normalerweise sind die ja auf einer Häuserwand montiert. 
Und, solche Teile sollten keinen addr:*=* tag bekommen, dafür sollte eher object:*=* verwendet werden, Infos findest du dazu im Wiki unter https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=object:
Lg
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:58:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
渤海西岸 (2026-03-16 06:41:42+00:00): 为什么给X507和X653降级了？
Orlppor (2026-03-16 07:39:28+00:00): 抱歉，一般穿过村庄的路都顺手这么给画了，如有破坏请您再进行修改，感谢
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Bienson (2026-03-12 01:47:32+00:00): material=metal ist der Tag, den du suchst
Bienson (2026-03-12 01:52:13+00:00): Unsinniges Multipolygon
später77 (2026-03-13 09:18:16+00:00): Van ösvény. Te magad tapostad, olyan gyakran jársz arra. Küldd el a képeket, meg a nem létező kilátásról is, ugyanis elég jó onnan a panoráma.
Bienson (2026-03-12 01:53:40+00:00): Unsinniges Multipolygon
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-12 13:35:11+00:00): und nochmals korrigiert.
Bienson (2026-03-12 01:54:50+00:00): Also öffentlich zugänglich für Fußgänger, nur nicht für Fahrzeuge?
ColbyTheWorldTraveler (2026-04-06 19:53:57+00:00): OpenStreetMap has a policy of "One item, one feature". Either the building should have the description, or the node, but not both.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179717103
ColbyTheWorldTraveler (2026-04-06 19:51:55+00:00): When you add buildings, you can hit the "Q" button to square it, which looks nicer on the map and generally is more accurate to reality.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179717202
Bienson (2026-03-12 01:57:59+00:00): Also doch öffentlich zugänglich für Fußgänger, nur nicht für Fahrzeuge?
Unterschiedliche access-Tags für Wege und Fläche
osmmapper222 (2026-03-11 19:55:48+00:00): Hallo Anonym7577,

bei der Ladesäule hast du capacity=22 angeben.

Kann man hier wirklich 22 Autos (an einer Ladesäule) aufladen?

Das OSM-Wiki [0] definiert capacity wie folgt:

" Anzahl der Ladestellen (Anzahl der Fahrzeuge welche gleichzeitig geladen werden können. Die Gesamtzahl der Anschlüsse kann höher sein.)"

--- 

[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
Anonym7577 (2026-03-11 20:10:18+00:00): Hallo osmmaper222,

danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe die Ladeleistung (22kw) mit der Kapazität verwechselt. Danke für die Klarstellung der Definition.
sembelst134 (2026-04-08 12:00:40+00:00): Danke fürs Aktualisieren.
Frage: wie bist du auf die Breite von 3m gekommen? In der Zeitung stand damals 4,5m als ich den Hinweis note/4947745 erstellt habe (den könnte man anschließend schließen)
ErichJacobi (2026-04-14 07:21:03+00:00): Die 3 m waren nach Befahrung des Weges nur eine Schätzung. Auf Grund des angesprochenen Zeitungsartikels habe ich die Breite auf 4,5 m korrigiert. Vielen Dank für die Bemerkung.
Den Hinweis note/4947745 habe ich daraufhin geschlossen.
ColbyTheWorldTraveler (2026-04-06 19:50:20+00:00): Looks good! Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179717376
pkoby (2026-03-11 21:01:33+00:00): Just a note about driveways: if they're marked private, that can sometimes cause issues for delivery drivers. Generally, routers consider driveway as basically private, but they're still a way that you'd want to route to if you're going to someone's house. 
`access=destination` solves these issues. It's extremely helpful especially on driveway that connect at two points to the main roadway, because routers will try to use those to make a u-turn to reroute.
I-76 (2026-03-11 21:21:15+00:00): 100% makes sense. Using the wiki definition of private, there are two qualifiers: Gate or (No tresspassing et al) Sign. The driveways I was removing the tag from had neither. Eventually, I'll get to detailing these neighborhoods much more, and neighborhoods I have already completed do have access=destination on all of their driveways. I'll probably manually add the building shapefiles from MontCo (west of 23 should hopefully be done by summer), as drawing them is a pain for me, and then I'll get to adding driveways and other neighborhood detail which will be tidied. The access=private on the driveways I was removing it from should not have the tag, so I was removing it in the meantime.
pkoby (2026-03-11 21:59:08+00:00): Whoops, I misread OSMCha and thought you were *adding* access=private.

Hey, most people hate tracing buildings. I've done a lot where Philly imagery bled over, but the quality is so bad on the public MontCo that it's definitely a pain.
I-76 (2026-03-11 23:43:06+00:00): Oh I basically never use the MontCo imagery for that reason. Fun how the best imagery for me is old (esri clarity) or misaligned (PEMA). The best MontCo imagery is Nearmap, but it's licensed for county use. Ah well, we're probably spoiled by the Phila imagery.
NeisBot (2026-03-11 18:49:18+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13639252534 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bail bond office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-20 05:33:05+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180140271
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Bienson (2026-03-12 02:00:41+00:00): Also öffentlich zugänglich für Fußgänger?
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-12 13:43:03+00:00): korrigiert.
Bienson (2026-03-12 02:01:29+00:00): Unsinniges Multipolygon, übereinander liegend
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-12 13:44:48+00:00): was liegt dort übereinander? ich hatte die Fläche doch neu angelegt.
Bienson (2026-03-16 22:44:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20306231/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20306230/history