piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2024-04-10 09:25:39+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149809972
Frans S (2024-04-10 09:37:34+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149810265
Frans S (2024-04-10 09:34:34+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, you combined 2 buildings (1 complex and 1 square) . Please map them individually .

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149810335
eggie (2024-09-19 06:51:16+00:00): Dag Duncan  Wanneer ik kijk op de laatste luchtfoto PDOK dan zie ik helemaal geen straten. 
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.47065,3.822320,17/?datastrip=20240821_PNEO-04

Hoe kun je dan zeggen dat die straten af zijn?

We tekenen geen plannen in.

Het is gewoon akkerland en ook geen landuse=construction.
De foto is van eind aug 2024

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-19 06:57:31+00:00): Op 24 sept jl zijn die wegen nog niet bestraat en/of opgeleverd.
Bovendien zijn ze door betonblokken afsgesloten. 
Wat is je bron dan dat die wegen zijn opgeleverd?
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.47927,3.611600,18/?datastrip=20240914_PNEO-03
Duncan van Dijk (2024-09-22 13:32:50+00:00): De bron is de bezorgers die daar regelmatig rijden van mijn bedrijf en ook al moeten bezorgen
eggie (2024-09-22 13:36:46+00:00): Ah.. oke... We gingen ook van jouw goedertrouw uit, maar met de meest recente PDOk foto's vallen de bezorgers door de mand. 😀

Denk dat je toch zelf nog zal moeten checken, want dit was nog wel erg prematuur.
Mvg
eggie
Frans S (2024-04-10 10:04:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149810993
NeisBot (2024-04-21 09:34:04+00:00): Hello user_21010523, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-30 15:16:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152041031, 152040999, 152041007, 152041053, 152041069 where the changeset comment is: revert changes by self-deleted user Harsha1999 after community complaints, DWG ticket #2024041110000024
Frans S (2024-04-10 10:06:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped.  1 remark. You often include the shadow into a mapping. This is not a part of the building !

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149811157
dunkaist (2024-04-16 13:48:21+00:00): Thank you!
ChrissW-R1 (2024-12-30 02:05:06+00:00): You're welcome @dunkaist
Yunan973 (2024-04-15 14:35:38+00:00): Bonjour,
d'où vient l'information que ce sont des appartements ? Le bâtiment est en travaux et d'après mes propres sources, ce sera une future crèche au rez-de-chaussée et des bureaux à l'étage
adrienandrem (2024-04-15 23:10:35+00:00): Bonjour,
comme vous pouvez le constater dans l'historique de l'élément [1], la précision de la valeur par défaut building=yes vers building=apartments a été ajoutée par la modification n°103222199 datant de 3 ans [2] et de source=survey signifiant observation terrain [3].
A ma connaissance, le sens de building=apartments ne se limite pas à ce qu'une traduction mot-à-mot vers le français pourrait laisser entendre. J'attire votre attention sur le fait que building=* concerne le type de bâtiment tel qu'il a été conçu, plus que l'usage qui en est fait ou les services qu'il abrite [4].
Ainsi on trouve couramment building=apartments pour un bâtiment citadin qui abrite un commerce au rez-de-chaussée et un ou plusieurs logements à l'étage, qui, avec peu de travaux, peuvent être reconvertis en local d'entreprise, et vice-versa. Ce que vous décrivez peut être dans OSM en tant qu'un building=apartments + deux points (amenity=kindergarten, level=0) et (office=company, level=1).
Si des travaux ont modifié structurellement le bâtiment pour un usage dédié, libre à vous de choisir parmi la liste du wiki [5] ou des utilisations courantes [6] une valeur plus adaptée.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71487601/history
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103222199
[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source#Specific_values
[4] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings#Tagging
[5] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
[6] https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/building#values

Cordialement
adrienandrem (2024-04-15 23:40:48+00:00): Vos "propres sources" sont-elles compatibles avec le principe OSM de vérifiabilité [1], c'est à dire que les autres contributeurs doivent pouvoir être en mesure de vérifier leur origine ?

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#V%C3%A9rification

Cordialement
Yunan973 (2024-04-20 16:42:31+00:00): Bonjour,
ok pour ces explications, j'ai vu que vous veniez de faire une modif sur le bâtiment, je n'ai pas regardé l'historique, à tord : mea culpa.
Quand j'ai apporté des correctifs à ce quartier, je n'ai pas touché ce bâtiment (hormis sa géométrie) car, comme indiqué il est en travaux mais les travaux semblent être en voie d'achèvement donc j'attends pour voir la réalité des chose : je n'allais pas mettre une crèche tant que la crèche n'est pas ouverte.

Pour info, votre modif roof:levels=0 est incompatible avec roof:shape=gabled. Soit le toit est plat (roof:levels=0 signifie cela), soit il ne l'est pas (roof:shape=gabled signifie cela).

Cordialement
Yunan973 (2024-04-20 17:39:29+00:00): Je ne sais pas si le bâtiment a changé depuis cette vue de Mapillary de 2016 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=4.941183719799994&lng=-52.322160042799965&z=17&pKey=895131437998536&focus=photo&x=0.5744702711141862&y=0.4686830065254675&zoom=1, mais si c'est toujours valable roof:levels est plus proche de 1 que de 0
adrienandrem (2024-04-20 23:20:13+00:00): Bonjour,

je ne suis pas d'accord sur votre interprétation des tags. Je comprends roof:levels comme étant le nombre d'étages situés sous la pente du toit [1], et roof:shape comme étant le type de forme du toit [2].
Sur la photo Mapillary, j'observe un bâtiment à 1 RdC et 1 étage (soit 2 niveaux) qui ne sont pas sous la pente de toit (leurs murs sont verticaux) et ce bâtiment a un toit à 2 pentes (aucun étage ne semble aménagé sous les combles et il ne semble pas y avoir l'espace nécessaire).
C'est-à-dire : building=* + building:levels=2 + roof:levels=0 + roof:shape=gabled. Ce qui est actuellement présent dans OSM.

Cordialement

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:roof:levels?uselang=fr
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:roof:shape?uselang=fr
Yunan973 (2024-04-23 12:48:47+00:00): Bonjour,

un niveau/étage ne veut pas dire qu'il est aménagé mais, quand height et roof:height ne sont pas utilisés, que la hauteur du toit entre le haut du bâtiment (à 2 étages) et le faite du toit correspond à la hauteur d'un, de 2 voir d'un demi étage (puisque les valeurs 0.5 sont autorisées, voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels#Values et https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/roof%3Alevels#values).

Ces valeurs servent aux représentations 3D des bâtiments. Une unité de building:levels et de roof:levels correspondent à height=3 (mètres) (quand height et roof:height ne sont pas précisés) donc ici building:levels=2 et roof:levels=0 correspond à height=6 et roof:height=0.

Pour conclure vous pouvez mettre roof:levels=0 (pour indiquer que la partie sous toiture n'est pas utilisée) mais à la seule condition de préciser les hauteurs height et roof:height (dans les représentations 3D, height écrase levels) sinon il faut mettre roof:levels non nul (si on veut être plus précis, au vu de Mapillery, je mettrais building;level=2, roof:levels=0.7 ou, pour être parfait, building;level=2, roof:levels=0, height=8, roof:height=2)

Cordialement
Yunan973 (2024-04-27 18:01:34+00:00): J'ai apporté des précisions sur la version anglaise du wiki car je pense que beaucoup de gens ne connaissent pas ce que je t'ai expliqué dans mon commentaire précédent : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings#Usage_of_height,_roof:height,_building:levels,_roof:levels

J'attends quelques jours pour voir si d'autres rédacteurs de wiki réagissent à mon apport puis j'en ferai une traduction sur le wiki en français.

Cordialement
adrienandrem (2024-05-31 19:08:57+00:00): Bonjour,

"vous pouvez mettre roof:levels=0 mais à la seule condition de"
Sans indiquer sur quelle référence elle s'appuie, cette considération vous appartient, tout autant que l'exigence du niveau de détail ou de "perfection" à apporter à la description des bâtiments.

building:levels et roof:levels sont considérés par une majorité de contributeurs comme étant les nombres entiers "d'étages (sans compter ceux du toit)" et "d'étages dans le toit", et renseignés comme tels.

Vous remarquerez que chaque page du Wiki dispose d'un onglet discussion qu'il conviendrait d'utiliser avant d'éditer une page.

En ce qui me concerne, la modélisation 3D n'est pas un sujet sur lequel je souhaite passer du temps.

Cordialement
Hufkratzer (2024-04-11 01:05:22+00:00): Hi, I think you have used the tag leisure=horse_riding incorrectly. There are certainly not 8 riding centers in the small area covered by this change set. Please have a look at the related wiki pages and examples of how this tag should be used:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/906634102 (example)
Frans S (2024-04-10 10:02:11+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Sometimes oversized buildings
Included shadowline.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149811497
Frans S (2024-04-10 10:00:29+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. Try not to include the shadow in a mapping.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149811502
eggie (2024-09-22 13:26:34+00:00): Dag Duncan,

Dit is allemaal een plan nog. Ook nu nog na 6 maanden. Er is nog helemaal niets te zien. 
Een medemapper heeft terecht alles weer op proposed gezet.
MVG
eggie
Herman Lee (2024-04-14 04:27:17+00:00): Please use the correct tags for bus routes.
eserte (2024-05-22 15:41:29+00:00): Hi! Ist der Köllnischer Platz tatsächlich Richtung Süden gesperrt? Mir ist vor ein paar Tagen nichts dergleichen aufgefallen.
Berlin53 (2024-06-01 17:01:04+00:00): Du meinst sicherlich die Fahrspur auf dern Schienen. Die ist nur für Busse freigegeben, die diese nach eigener Beobachtung aber nicht nutzen. Vielleicht der Nachtbus?
eserte (2024-06-01 21:56:14+00:00): Ich meine access=no bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/140964912 , wodurch die Straße auf der Standardkarte als nicht befahrbar gerendert wird (grau gestrichelt). Und außerdem vermeiden alle Auto-Router diesen Streckenabschnitt, z.B. hier zu sehen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=52.44574%2C13.57001%3B52.44179%2C13.56942 (Umweg über Westendstraße und Rudower Straße)
Berlin53 (2024-06-02 13:13:10+00:00): Sorry, mein Fehler. Ist nun beseitigt. Danke für den Hinweis.
mcliquid (2024-04-10 11:05:54+00:00): This changeset has been partially reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149814336
Frans S (2024-04-10 10:13:14+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149811842
Frans S (2024-04-10 10:09:21+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings often oversized.
Included shadow line into a mapping,
Complex building mapped just as a rectangular building. (inaccurate)


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149811866
Leo Slager (2024-04-10 22:29:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-11 23:49:16+00:00): changeset reverted in part or full
Frans S (2024-04-10 10:22:41+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, you often include the shadow of a building into your mapping.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149812069
Frans S (2024-07-28 10:42:19+00:00): Sorry for the late response on your mappings.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping.

C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.

D: Connecting Nodes to other features.

E: Buildings not squared.



Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149812158
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-30 15:16:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152041031, 152040999, 152041007, 152041053, 152041069 where the changeset comment is: revert changes by self-deleted user Harsha1999 after community complaints, DWG ticket #2024041110000024
Frans S (2024-04-10 10:25:19+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149812272
Nakaner (2024-04-11 08:51:31+00:00): Hallo,

bleibt die Benutzung dauerhaft auf Fuß- und Radverkehr beschränkt oder ist das nur ein (baubedingter) Übergangszustand?

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149812874
Vanessa4388 (2024-04-11 08:57:35+00:00): Hallo Michael! Die Brücke ist generell nur für Radfahrer und Fußgänger, sie bleibt also dauerhaft dafür beschränkt. Danke der Nachfrage und beste Grüße zurück, Vanessa
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149812874
Nakaner (2024-04-12 18:40:06+00:00): Ok, dann wäre es sinnvoll, die Straßenkategorie auf "Geh- und Radweg" zu ändern (also highway=path + foot=designated + bicycle=designated).
maro21 (2024-04-14 21:17:40+00:00): Twój opis jest sprzeczny z tagami, które zmieniłeś. Skoro łącznik znajduje się na pierwszym piętrze, to tagowanie było poprawne. Przywróciłem poprzednie tagi.
Piskvor (2024-04-10 14:22:39+00:00): Dobrý den,

díky za snahu varovat před pastí na turisty a rozšířit OSM. Bohužel mapa k tomu není vhodný nástroj. V první řadě existuje řada platforem na recenze, ve druhé to cca nikdo nebude hledat přímo v popisu mapového prvku, a v neposlední řadě OSM není místo pro sdílení subjektivních zkušeností, jakkoli by mohly pomoci dalším.

Revertnuto v https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149821323#map=19/50.08864/14.40235

Mapování zdar,
Piškvor
matix849 (2024-04-10 18:57:49+00:00): Mam wątpliwości co do tych zmian. W pliku PDF udostępnionym na stronie DSDiK ta droga nie ma nadal numeru: https://dsdik.wroc.pl/images/stories/infrastruktura/drogi/ukad_dw_01012024.pdf
W wykazie również: https://dsdik.wroc.pl/images/stories/infrastruktura/drogi/tabela_wykaz%20dw_20240101.pdf
Dodatkowo nie znalazłem jakiejkolwiek uchwały czy to Rady Miejskiej w Wałbrzychu czy Sejmiku Województwa Dolnośląskiego o nadaniu takiego numeru tej drodze.
Według mnie zmiana do wycofania.
szalona_entropia (2024-04-11 07:37:05+00:00): https://edziennik.gddkia.gov.pl/legalact/2024/7/
szalona_entropia (2024-04-11 07:40:01+00:00): https://dsdik.wroc.pl/images/stories/infrastruktura/drogi/uklad_dw_01012024.jpg
matix849 (2024-04-11 09:30:24+00:00): Ok, dzięki za uzupełnienie tego zarządzenia od GDDKiA 👍
Filip009 (2024-04-11 08:14:06+00:00): Zdravím, keď dopĺňaš stĺpy, môžeš aj elektrické vedenie cez nich natiahnuť ;)
macdale (2024-04-11 09:34:32+00:00): Jasne, to k tomu sa etste vratim.
Nakaner-repair (2024-04-10 11:25:11+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 149795367, 149796821.
Leo Slager (2024-04-10 22:32:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Didideos (2024-04-10 11:52:34+00:00): please dont mark it as spam i live in this house and i needed to correct this mistake because i dont get my packages since we parted the house
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-11 23:49:55+00:00): this is not how you add trees.

Changeset reverted
Alexmol (2025-10-27 13:14:45+00:00): Olá.
O caminho dos Promontórios está marcado com a sinalética oficial e o código PR1 LGA ?
akimapbuilder (2024-04-10 11:46:29+00:00): When adding roads, try to follow actual road geometry on the satellite imagery. Thanks!
W25E6OOQHP (2024-04-11 08:37:31+00:00): But that's not actual road, people made that as road Vehicles cannot move on that.
Bobropiton (2024-04-10 17:13:18+00:00): А мы то и не знали, как тегировать остановки. Пришел какой то рандом и начал нас учить.
Сходите прочитайте мануал по остановкам: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:public_transport