piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Xarpila (2024-05-10 07:04:10+00:00): Hi Frans!  Thanks for your message.  I really appreciate the feedback as I'm new to this and I feel like I've been running blind for the most part.  I'm sorry that I didn't see your message until after I finished yesterday's session.  I'm not sure when I'll have a chance for another session, but I'll continue to work on the Bosawás project for as long as it's available.  Since the instructions were in Spanish, I've been putting my comments in Spanish, which I'm totally comfortable with.  Should I switch to commenting in English?
FransWillem (2024-05-10 18:00:05+00:00): Spanish is no problem. When the project lanquage is spanish. It is fine.
Nowadays translating is so  easy.
I use deeple. Fine tool.
Best regards
bxl-forever (2024-05-09 14:08:00+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM.

Sadly, we had to undo your change.

Buildings in Brussels are always traced by following numerical imagery provided by the Brussels-Capital Region.  Please do not redraw them by following distorted aerial imagery.
Frans S (2024-05-09 12:58:11+00:00): Hello.
I reviewed this changeset as well.
Where a road crossed a waterway, you need to add a crossing. f.i. bridge, culvert or ford in these cases.
It makes no sens to map short isolated pieces of paths wich are only of local interest. 
Focus on throughgoing higways.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151097586
Frans S (2024-05-09 12:54:01+00:00): Hello, Thanks for mapping.
A remark.
While adding a path, connect it also on other highways, close to it.
Don't leave a gap, like here.
Best regards
Frans S (2024-05-09 12:48:08+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, The rectangular buildings are not squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151097805
eggie (2024-05-09 13:04:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Zo te zien klopt het aardig. Goed gelukt dus. Wel heb ik nog een fietsafslag G11 nog ingetekend bij Denka International.

Wat niet logisch is is de categorie van het fietspad. Het oude vervolg is allemaal G11 (Verplicht fietspad. 
Wat jij hebt aangesloten is nog steeds Bromfietspad G12a?  De oude Bromfietspad toegangsweg. 
Waar begingt het G11 fietspad en moeten de brommers weer de hoofdrijbaan op?


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-05-09 13:09:33+00:00): Even gespiekt in straatkijk.. Mag eigenlijk niet. Ik heb het nu juist aangepast. Tot het parkeerterrein G12a  Daarna G11. 
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2024-05-09 13:27:19+00:00): Denk niet dat de Postcode klopt.
Ik zal de info samenvoegen met een later geïmporteerde adresnode nr 45
Pedro-Bnu (2024-06-05 02:48:45+00:00): Ola, tudo bem?
Essa alteracao bloqueou o acesso em varias ruas, que agora ja estao disponiveis para acesso. Por exemplo, na Avenida Rio Grande do Sul, boa parte dela ja esta com acesso OK. Essas ruas que foram bloqueadas, serao alteradas aqui no OSM?
ftrebien (2024-06-05 22:17:47+00:00): Olá Pedro. Essa alteração foi feita em contato com a comunidade do RS no Telegram com base em imagens de satélite. Dentro do município de Porto Alegre, eu tenho feito inspeções em campo (survey) e desbloqueado as vias conforme a água inundação vai passando. Canoas é longe para mim, mas se você tiver acesso a informações detalhadas de quais vias já estão secas, pode desbloqueá-las. Para fazer isso, lembre de remover todas as 4 etiquetas relativas a esse evento: damage:event=2024RioGrandeDoSulFloods, damage:event:wikidata=Q125772990, damage:type=flood e access=no.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-09 12:50:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11563975556

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Damian05 (2024-05-09 13:04:16+00:00): Dzięki za czujność. Już poprawiłem błędy
NorthCrab (2024-05-09 19:29:40+00:00): Tutaj chodziło jedynie aby podać pełną nazwę ulicy: Traugutta -> Romualda Traugutta :-) !
Damian05 (2024-05-13 12:06:57+00:00): Rozumiem. Dzięki za info
Supaplex030 (2024-05-12 21:19:53+00:00): Hi Daniela,

you are obviously not aware that you have added your changes to the public OSM geodatabase or that OSM is not a database for private location markers.

Please use other tools and services like "UMap" (https://umap.openstreetmap.fr) for this.

I have already reverted the changes.

Best, Alex
TrickyFoxy (2024-05-09 19:15:57+00:00): Парковка необязательно обозначается знаком. На снимках видно, что это место — парковка.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151116127
joost schouppe (2024-09-22 20:04:08+00:00): Je denkt eraan om deze weg terug open te stellen als de werken klaar zijn?
Je had hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/941944389/ ook de fietsstraat tag weggehaald, ik neem aan dat dat een foutje was.
Waaslander (2024-09-30 17:16:43+00:00): Ah dat kan inderdaad een fout zijn. Was eerst nog niet van op de hoogte dat het eindstuk een fietsstraat werd.
De volgende keer ik er langsfiets zal ik het updaten :)
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-05-09 15:48:59+00:00): 刚刚在 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151061822 中讨论了您说的公交车不受限制重量的条件如何表述

这里看您用了一个 

> note=No goods vehicles with total weight more than 5T. 

我猜意思是超过5吨的货车不可以驶入？（但是其他种类的车辆是不受5吨限制的？）

如果是这样，可以试试 

maxweight:hgv=5

同样的，文档出自 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxweight ，以及如果有意见可以在Telegram群里讨论
woodpeck (2024-05-27 11:44:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/119696984 certainly doesn't look like a "primary_link"?
ika-chan! (2024-05-27 13:41:59+00:00): That is actually a provincial road, and should be "secondary" per community consensus.
ika-chan! (2024-06-03 00:07:41+00:00): Changeset was reverted as the user has not replied to any of our concerns.
puchaczowsky (2024-05-10 17:31:23+00:00): Na pewno?
https://edziennik.gddkia.gov.pl/DU_GDDKIA/2024/6/akt.pdf
szalona_entropia (2024-05-11 08:04:47+00:00): Nie na pewno. https://drogi.gddkia.gov.pl/mapy/mapa-informacji-drogowej (słupki pikietażowe)
Hufkratzer (2024-05-09 19:03:04+00:00): Hi,
You have retagged a building to a riding centre. Now this building is no longer visible as a building on the map. Also the area of the riding centre is probably larger than the area of this building (see https://www.centro-ippico.net/cecinese.php), If the building is a riding is for horse  riding you can use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=riding_hall for it. I would recommend to create a separate object (node or area) for the riding centre, compare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268779943#map=17/43.64313/10.38555
HaraldBk (2026-07-08 00:28:42+00:00): Hallo, woher kommt der Wert access=destination? Ich sehe bloß eine Schild 240, ohne Zusatzzeichen für Freigaben. https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/HaraldBk?lat=49.470742217495&lng=11.208844488460045&z=17&menu=false&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&focus=photo&pKey=2041667319754566
Und weißt du zufällig, was der Grund für highway=track ist? Für einen asphaltierten Rad-/Fußweg hätte ich "path" eingetragen.
Jorisbo (2026-07-08 07:05:01+00:00): Hallo Harald! Danke fur deine beitrage. Ich habe damals nur die access geändert da destination auch forestry impliciert. Als es tatsächlich verboten ist fur alle lkw/pkw/forestry/agricultural werde ich sagen  highway=footway oder highway=path mit bicycle=designated. Sonst ist highway=track und tracktype=grade1 auch meine wahl. Aber das weiss ich nicht. Als du die umgebung kensst, bitte ändere es einfach. Grusse Joris
HaraldBk (2026-07-08 09:32:31+00:00): Thank you very much for your reply! Next time I ride there I will check the two paths that lead into the way, maybe there are traffic signs which allow forestry/agricultural traffic. If not I will turn the track into a path.
VictorIE (2024-05-16 10:14:50+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11891415074

There seems to be at least 4 places with name=Dental Surgery in Ennis. Are these names correct?
Oxeelix (2025-06-24 21:16:16+00:00): Pretty sure I just took down the name of the dental places that was outside their place. Never really looked to dig deeper into that
ivanbranco (2024-05-10 19:48:36+00:00): Ciao Siciliapars,

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/edit-war-sospetta-ad-alghero/112538

queste modifiche sono state oggetto di un topic sul forum nel caso volessi intervenire.
SomeoneElse (2024-05-14 10:52:20+00:00): Looking at e.g. https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/930968280 , what was the previous "prow:ref" ("326/4") likely to have been?  It wasn't the same as "prow_ref" ("Radley FP 4")?
Was it perhaps some internal council GIS thing that doesn't belong in OSM?
DaveF (2024-05-14 12:55:46+00:00): Aargh... I made the poor assumption that the incorrect key held the incorrect value, but it appears "326/4" is the correct value & "Radley FP 4" is the made up one. Will revert & redo.
SomeoneElse (2024-05-14 14:42:53+00:00): Thanks!
acsd (2024-05-11 08:59:40+00:00): Почему время изменена?
Глеб (2024-05-11 09:25:40+00:00): Да, месяца можно было не добавлять
eggie (2024-05-09 14:46:27+00:00): Dag PBV

Het lijkt me niet de bedoeling om al die huisnummers samen te voegen op één node.
main entrance kan ook zonder adressen. 
Soms zie je wel dat je alle adressen op een hoopje bij de ingang legt. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-09 14:46:57+00:00): Kijk eens naar het effect als je ctrl-f5 toetst!
eggie (2024-05-09 16:02:42+00:00): Er lopen div draadjes over.

addr:flats=118-126;218-226;318-326;418-426;518-526;618-626;718-726;818-826;918-926

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vindbaarheid-ingangen-op-grote-sites/95131/15

en
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ingang-van-gebieden-voor-navigatie/111002/22

Met addr:housenumber=housenumber krijg je ongewenst effect van grote vlakken huisnummers overal over de openbare weg heen.
Geen succes lijkt mij.
Wellicht addr:flats= gebruiken? 
Mvg
eggie
PBVAlexPE (2024-05-09 20:33:46+00:00): Klinkt als een goed plan, had die draadjes niet gevonden alleen wat op de wiki en daarbij over hoe het in polen gaat.
Ik weet iig dat routers er veel moeite mee hebben momenteel.
Zal het aanpassen naar addr:flats
eggie (2024-05-09 20:36:29+00:00): 👍
SomeoneElse (2024-06-06 10:12:22+00:00): For info, there are still some "source:prow:ref" on a few of these - https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1MwP
eggie (2024-05-09 14:38:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Tip:  In OSM taggen we bedrijven bij op de adresnode. Dus niet op de gebouwomtrek.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-05-09 14:41:41+00:00): Alle info heb ik verwijderd van de gebouwomtrek en verplaatst naar de adresnode.
Groet
eggie
AmirHasan (2024-05-09 13:57:40+00:00): مرکز ارتباط با ایرانسل 52023
fititnt (2024-05-11 23:51:25+00:00): Olá. Sobre conteúdo deletado.

Nesse changeset, você deletou uma quantidade significativa de edificações do https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Import/Catalogue/Brazil_PMPA_Buildings_Import que, inclusive, tinha sido feito no passado com imagens de alta resolução do que as imagens do Bing nessa região.

Qual razão para isso?

E outra pergunta: onde está a documentação na OpenStreetMap wiki sobre essa atividade? Conforme a EOG (https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines), é necessário documentar, e no https://t.me/osmrs já foi pedido mais de uma vez para que qualquer Organized Editing que traga pessoas nova nessa região sejam documentados, pois já houve problemas com atividade que ocorreu ano passado. Enfim, se essa atividade ainda não está os OSM Wiki, qual prazo para documentarem?
linkgeo (2024-05-13 13:21:50+00:00): Bom dia Fititnt, tudo bem? 
Conforme respondi anteriormente na sua próxima msg em outro changeset, havia entendido que seria para realizar a vetorização sobre a img bing, novamente peço desculpa pelo dano causado e me comprometo a revetorizar sobre a img de alta resolução que você citou. 
Abraços e fico a disposição para conversas.
Raquel Dezidério Souto (2024-05-22 05:50:05+00:00): linkgeo, não precisa revetorizar, basta realizarem o revert do changeset, favor entrar em contato com o responsável pelo projeto.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151101972
kapazao (2024-05-10 16:47:05+00:00): ¿Por qué añades un área industrial totalmente superpuesta a una estación de servicio?
Por favor lee información en la wiki acerca del etiquetado de estaciones de servicio/gasolineras.
Además nunca se deben etiquetar elementos totalmente superpuestos de esta forma, en todo caso le podrías haber añadido la etiqueta a la estación de servicio, pero tampoco es correcta ni necesaria.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151103331
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-12 12:16:37+00:00): Just a test or 
what's the source of your mapping? 
Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-10 06:22:10+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151079114
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151079618
MistaMonroe (2024-05-10 16:10:28+00:00): So I’ll totally be honest, I did add them for Pokemon Go. I heard about being able to add in these features for the game and wanted to check it out. But, Instead of adding a random location as a beach, I actually found a beach and was mapping that location as one. This is a summer camp where kids swim, and there is a beach, lifeguard stand, multiple docks, volleyball court, etc. at this location next to the playground and around the pond. The other two locations I added as beaches on the river are “beaches” because the camp uses them as swimming holes for the campers. They even go tubing down the river. I hope this will be reconsidered. Thanks.
kapazao (2024-05-10 16:44:48+00:00): Hola, las calles peatonales con nombre propio se etiquetan como highway=pedestrian y las que no lo tienen se les añade noname=yes. Las sendas peatonales o caminos para peatones, que irían por mitad de plazas o parques por ejemplo, u otras vías para peatones como aceras, sí se etiquetan como highway=footway.
Por favor corrige esto y no modifiques cosas si no estás seguro.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151103787
kapazao (2024-05-10 16:44:49+00:00): Hola, las calles peatonales con nombre propio se etiquetan como highway=pedestrian y las que no lo tienen se les añade noname=yes. Las sendas peatonales o caminos para peatones, que irían por mitad de plazas o parques por ejemplo, u otras vías para peatones como aceras, sí se etiquetan como highway=footway.
Por favor corrige esto y no modifiques cosas si no estás seguro.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151103787
literan (2024-05-14 17:48:38+00:00): зачем вы нарисовали еще одно здание поверх существующего?
Tatiana24 (2024-05-14 19:13:04+00:00): я делаю по инструкции озон профит, ничего лишнего не рисую
literan (2024-05-14 19:45:21+00:00): еще раз: здесь уже было нарисовано здание. Вы поверх него нарисовали еще одно. 

Попробуйте задуматься, прежде чем "делать по инструкции". В противном случае вы будете заблокированы
TrickyFoxy (2024-05-13 08:42:08+00:00): О?
JeroenvanderGun (2025-01-28 22:40:39+00:00): The legal basis for the zones is tied to the side of the road rather than the direction of travel (e.g. pedestrians can walk on the left), hence the choice for :left/:right instead of :forward/:backward is intentional and matches the tagging of other roads on a boundary. Data consumers can take driving_side into account for interpretation.
mueschel (2025-01-29 07:09:13+00:00): Hi,
left/right usually refers to a feature besides the main feature, e.g. a sidewalk on the side of the highway, but not to the left and right half of an object.

While the regulation obviously depends on the left/right half of the road, I think backward/forward is the closest we can get to in OSM using existing tags.
JeroenvanderGun (2025-01-30 19:00:14+00:00): left and right can be and are used for both. For example, if you use name:left and name:right, this doesn't imply an unnamed space between both names. If you want to refer to a specific feature on the side instead of half the feature, you'd use something like sidewalk:right:name instead of name:right.
rskedgell (2024-05-09 15:14:35+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for updating this.

Although the street signs presumably say "Mardleywood", it might be worth adding an alt_name tag with "Mardley Wood" so that it turns up in searches. The latter form is also in OS Open Names, which would probably need help from your council to fix.
George_vB (2024-05-09 19:42:11+00:00): Done (I think) -thank you for this comment.
Branko Kokanovic (2024-05-10 09:33:10+00:00): dragomira ili dragoljuba? (ovog kulezica)
Misa_zumba (2024-05-10 09:41:07+00:00): Dragomira, u pravu si.
Hvala sto si primetio.
HAmap (2024-05-09 15:16:11+00:00): Hier steht dieses Schild:
https://adobe.ly/4aiOYNs

Kann man das auch mit
vehicle=forestry
traffic_sign=DE:250,1026-37
taggen, obwohl das nicht exakt stimmt?

Fun-Fact: Das ist die Zufahrt zum Clubhaus des Riot Lords MC
HAmap (2024-05-09 15:18:43+00:00): Nachtrag: Anfahrtskizze der Biker
http://www.riotlords.de/anfahrt.html
eggie (2024-05-09 15:42:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
MxxCon (2024-05-10 02:42:22+00:00): Hello.
Please split your edits into smaller geographic regions. There's no reason for a changeset like this to span across the whole world.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151106062
I-76 (2024-05-10 17:09:51+00:00): My bad. Didn't notice one of the fields was in the Philippines, otherwise it would have been limited to north america.
Supaplex030 (2024-05-12 21:20:05+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151098415.
martinst (2024-05-09 16:55:54+00:00): Hallo Schwarzstart,
ein paar Hinweise:
Im iD-Editor können Objekte durch Drücken der Taste Q rechtwinklig gemacht werden.
Bei den Gebäuden wie Way 1281207597 und 1281207594 könnte man noch building=yes ergänzen.
Gruß Martin
eggie (2024-05-09 15:48:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback   Het kan beter met een tunnel=culvert worden getagd layer=-1 waterway=canal
Het geeft nu foutmeldingen. De culvert begint dan waar 
Ik pas even wat aan. 

Je kunt ook de hoogte en de breedte van duiker meegeven in de tagging.




MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-05-09 15:54:36+00:00): Aangepast naar tunnel=culvert worden getagd layer=-1 waterway=canal
eggie (2024-05-11 06:27:48+00:00): Dag Wim Je vraagt feedback.
Die uitzonderingen op oneway=yes zijn natuurlijk prima. Wel oppassen met schuiven van de kaart in editmodus. Dan kun je al snels onbedoeld nodes verschuiven. In dit geval helaas adresnodes Groeneweg 4 en
Doctor Brevéestraat 63.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151106368

Wanneer iets een speelveld is niet name=speelveld gebruiken of het moet de geografische naam zijn.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-11 06:32:59+00:00): Adressen hersteld
eggie (2024-05-11 06:35:48+00:00): leisure track gebruik je niet zo. Zoek het eens op in de wiki.
eggie (2024-05-11 06:44:10+00:00): Wellicht heb je hier iets aan?
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=11-05-2023&loc=52.06561%2C5.197153%2C20z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2024-03-18&acqid=20240318_105311_PNEO-04_1_1&sensor=Pleiades-NEO

Dan kun je de nieuwe situatie intekenen.
Mapse
eggie
aduxas (2026-06-08 13:21:23+00:00): You changed several paths to foot paths in Chase Farm.  This is incorrect.  Not only are bicycles allowed by law here, you need to check the wiki page for foot paths.  None of these paths are foot paths.
AndersAndersson (2024-05-10 06:42:49+00:00): Hej!
Kul att du gör så mycket bra ändringar i Openstreetmap!
Ett tips är att lägga till foot=yes och bicyle=yes på grindar i skogen.
Oftast gäller allemansrätten, men utan dessa taggar så förhindras vägvisning förbi bommar/grindar efter skogsvägar.
HirschKauz (2024-05-09 18:12:34+00:00): Hi!  
Hier sind nun unterschiedliche Kontakt- und Brand-Daten. Einmal mit contact:*=* und einmal ohne. Welche sind korrekt?  
Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151106896
MichaelFS (2024-05-09 19:27:29+00:00): contact:website antwortet nicht, habe ich entfernt.
HirschKauz (2024-05-10 07:20:02+00:00): ... und ich hab noch den Rest vom Kamps entfernt ;-) Grüße
miluethi (2024-08-01 03:01:40+00:00): Hi Anthony,

This building shape doesn't match the real building and it's not squared out. Please map more carefully. Thanks.
osmviborg (2024-05-09 17:02:47+00:00): at bruge multipolygoner på denne måde giver ingen mening
Map-Peter (2024-05-10 00:14:28+00:00): Hallo Philipp,
 
ich bin hier über "tower:type=monument" gestolpert.  
Das passt hier nicht - siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tower:type=monument?uselang=de .
 
Ist das überhaupt ein "tower": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dtower  
oder ein "mast"?  
(siehe Abgrenzung zwischen den Beiden im Wiki-Artikel)
 
Gruß Peter
th62pi (2024-05-10 08:11:04+00:00): Ja, Du hast recht, das passt nicht. Es sind Masten um Lautsprecher dran zu befestigen (und Deko), ziemlich groß. (Die beiden rechts und links von der Bühne. Die sechs die im Kreis stehen sind als Lichtmasten vermutlich korrekt getagt.)
Einfach "Mast" ohne weitere Eigenschaften?
th62pi (2024-05-10 17:19:20+00:00): So, jetzt nochmal richtig geschaut. Es geht ja um den in der Mitte. Da find ich das eigentlich gar nicht so unpassend. Wenn Du nach "Fusion Turmbühne" suchst findest Du Bilder. Er ist ziemlich groß, hat außer dass man um ihn herum tanzen kann keinen Zweck und ist dem "Phänomenta Lüdenscheid Turm" gar nicht so unähnlich, der im Wiki als Beispiel für "moderne monumentale Türme" angegeben ist.
Ltrlg (2025-11-30 21:44:48+00:00): J’ai de sérieux doutes sur les bornes historiques que vous avez ajoutées dans le coin. La 2e DB ne semble pas être passée par là si j’en crois la carte sur le site indiqué. En revanche ça correspond bien à la Voie de la Liberté. J’ai intégré les bornes à https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19902651 sans modifier leurs attributs pour l’instant, car j’aimerais savoir si ils sont le résultat d’un copier/coller trop peu vérifié, ou au contraire une incohérence du terrain ?
jbcharron (2025-12-01 06:49:15+00:00): Bonjour,
Toutes les bornes ajoutées ont été vérifiées sur le terrain, mais en effet ce sont des bornes de la voie de la liberté, n'ayant pas l'habitude j'avais pris une borne similaire qui elle concernait la 2è DB. Il faut reconnaitre qu'entre les 2 types, les différences ne sont pas flagrantes.
C'est corrigé ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175342761 pour celle dans la relation, je vais faire une passe sur les autres autour de Metz.
Merci pour votre vigilance
Bonne journée