piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-01-14 07:13:43+00:00): Merhaba. İşletmenin hatalı etiketlerini düzeltmiştim fakat tekrar değiştirmişsiniz. Burası eğer Turkcell bayisi ise brand=Turkcell ve brand:wikidata=Q283852 etiketlerinin kalması doğru olurdu, silmişsiniz. dealer = turkcell diye bir etiket eklemişsiniz. OpenStreetMap'te dealer diye bir etiket yok. Veri tüketicileri(örn. navigasyon uygulamaları), eklediğiniz bilgiyi anlamlandıramayacaktır. Örneğin OpenStreetMap kullanan bir navigasyon uygulamasında Turkcell bayilerini arayan bir kişi, bu işletmeyi bulamayacaktır.

addr:housenumber=* etiketi kapı numarasını eklemek için kullanılıyor. addr:unit=* ise örneğin birden fazla kapısı olan bir iş merkezinde, ilgili iş yerine ulaşmak için kullanılması gereken iş merkezinin girişini belirtmek için kullanılıyor. Bu iş yerinde ise sokak görüntülerinden anlaşıldığı kadarıyla böyle bir durum yok. Doğrudan caddeden erişilebilen bir yer gibi görünüyor. Dolayısıyl addr:unit etiketini kullanmanızın doğru olmadığını düşünüyorum.

Aynı şekilde service = mobile_phone diye bir etiket de yok. Bu iş yerinde telefon tamiri yapıldığını belirtmek için mobile_phone:repair=* etiketi kullanılabilir.

name=* etiketindeki Turkcell'i silip, Kardeşler Bilgisayar yazmışsınız. Bu etikete, tabelada en belirgin şekilde görünen ismin yazılması gerektiği kanaatindeyim. Eğer tabelada en büyük en belirgin görünen yazı Turkcell ise "Kardeşler Bilgisayar" ibaresi operator=* etiketine eklenmeliydi diye düşünüyorum( halihazırda ekli). İlgili Viki Sayfası: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

İyi günler.
Turkcell Kardesler Bilgisayar (2026-01-14 13:21:15+00:00): Merhaba! Öncelikle ilginiz ve yardımlarınız için teşekkürler. Ben bu işletmenin sahibiyim ve harita düzeltmeleri konusunda sizin kadar deneyimli değilim. Elimden geldiğince düzeltmeye çalıştım ama hatalar varsa lütfen siz düzeltin. Benim işletmem cadda üzerinde ve giriş kapısı direk cadde üzerinen yapılıyor. Perakende satış mağazası, cep telefonu ve bilgisayar satış ve teknik servis ayrıca turkcell alt bayisiyim kontörlü ve faturalı hat ile internet aboneliği yapıyoruz. Hem telefon hem bilgisayar aksesuarları satışı ve diğer küçük elektronik ürünler satışıda yapıyoruz. Bunların yanında yetkili fatura ödeme işlemleri de yapılmaktadır. Bu bilgiler ışığında lütfen harita bilgilerimizi doğru güncelleme hakkında bize yardımcı olmanızı rica ederim. Eşletmemim tam adresi Habibler, Eski Edirne Asfaltı Cd. No:980 D:1B sultangazi-İstanbul mail adresimi ve telefon numaramı sistemde mevcuttur gerekirse lütfen arayınız. İlgini ve yardımınız için teşekkür ederim
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-01-14 17:00:31+00:00): Merhaba. OpenStreetMap'te bir yer, yalnızca bir temel etiketle eklenebiliyor. Diğer bilgileri eklemek için ise yardımcı etiketler kullanılıyor. İşletmeniz için hangi temel etiket daha uygun fikrim yok. İşletme sahibi olarak temel etikete sizin karar vermeniz daha uygun olacaktır. Yazdıklarınıza göre şunlardan biri olabilir gibi duruyor:

Bu yerin esas faaliyeti bilgisayar satışı ise, shop=computer , bu yerin esas faaliyeti telefon satışı ise shop=mobile_phone , esas faaliyeti telefon aksesuarı satışı ise shop=mobile_phone_accessories , esas faaliyeti elektronik ürünlerin satışı ise shop=electronics , esas faaliyeti telekomünikasyon bayiliği ise shop=telecommunication , esas faaliyeti telefon ve bilgisayar servisi ise craft=electronics_repair etiketi, esas faaliyeti fatura ödeme merkezi ise amenity=payment_centre etiketi, 

yukarıdaki temel etiketlerinden yalnızca biri(hangisini esas faaliyet olarak eklemek istiyorsanız) eklenmeli. 

Diğer bilgiler ise yardımcı etiketler ile eklenmeli. (bilgisayar da satıldığını eklemek için computer:sales=yes , telefon da satıldığını eklemek için mobile_phone:sales=yes , telefon onarımı yapıldığını eklemek için repair=mobile_phone ve mobile_phone:repair=yes ... gibi)

Bu yerin esas faaliyeti olarak hangisi eklenmeli?
Turkcell Kardesler Bilgisayar (2026-01-14 17:37:17+00:00): Merhaba! Ana faaliyet konumuz cep telefonu satışı bizim için uygun olan shop mobile fone seçeneği teşekkürler
Taya_S (2026-01-15 11:09:30+00:00): Reverted test edits.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177254313
Natas74D7 (2026-01-14 02:28:33+00:00): Struggling with what to call different surfaces, like bare rock, marsh, garden, and scrub. ALSO, I have a feeling I'm going overkill with the amount of nodes, possibly hindering performance? Surface areas are relatively small, but have around 15–30 nodes per area within proximity.
dvillas (2026-02-03 17:47:54+00:00): - Source Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery
fortera_au (2026-01-15 01:02:11+00:00): Hi there, this looks pretty good, only thing would be that if 2 and 4 Winchester Street don't share a wall, they shouldn't be joined together. If iD is wanting to snap them together, I'm happy to help fix that with JOSM or another editor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177202796
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:22:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13454805545 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Math tutoring center in Spring"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-25 07:55:23+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted
Tatfahren (2026-01-14 11:49:04+00:00): Da du keine Quelle angegeben hast, und die Luftbilder in imagery_used auch noch nicht aktualisiert wurden, würde ich hiermit einmal nach der verwendeten Quelle fragen.
Tatfahren (2026-01-22 17:42:08+00:00): Ich war heute vor Ort und der Straßenverlauf stimmt schonmal nicht mit der Realität überein. Entsprechend setze ich das wegen der fehlenden Antwort jetzt zurück.

Schade um die anderen Details, die aber aus unzulässiger Quelle stammen könnten.
maddog107 (2026-01-14 04:05:38+00:00): meant 11 sorry
Littlebtc (2026-01-14 04:43:28+00:00): "台15甲"廢止，關聯一併參除
台4因為涉及施工路段，我還沒調整關聯
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-05 02:15:22+00:00): Hello!

You used
building=office_building
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1449508033/history

Have you maybe meant
building=office
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Teelow (2026-02-05 02:24:09+00:00): I am at a loss what you are referring to?  I live in the area and been in this building several times.  It contains offices and is also a club house for the housing tract.  This wasn't flagged for change why did you pick it?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-05 03:26:11+00:00): standard way of tagging office building is building=office - not building=office_building

so I am suggesting to change building=office_building to building=office
citrula (2026-01-15 17:44:27+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. On OSM, we use the unabbreviated version of the name whenever possible ("Rd" should be "Road" in this case). I have fixed that for you. Otherwise, this looks good to me.

Happy mapping!
AgusQui (2026-01-15 04:00:14+00:00): "Acceso a Pueblo de Zelaya" no es parte del nombre de la calle, si los lugareños le suelen decir así se puede agregar como alt_name
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:22:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13455334353 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Financial services company in Hudson Ohio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 07:55:23+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671506
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:22:53+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1268303121 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Digital marketing agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 07:55:25+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671508
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-03 07:24:36+00:00): Split to separate POI and clean up SEO spam tags added to building in changeset 183577733

https://osm.org/changeset/183577733
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:22:55+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1268303121 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Digital marketing agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-25 07:55:26+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/177456909
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-03 07:24:28+00:00): Split to separate POI and clean up SEO spam tags added to building in changeset 183577733

https://osm.org/changeset/183577733
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:22:56+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1268303121 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Design and digital marketing agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-25 07:55:27+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/177671508
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-03 07:24:13+00:00): Split to separate POI and clean up SEO spam tags added to building in changeset 183577733

https://osm.org/changeset/183577733
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:22:58+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13455347845 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Plumbing services in Ottawa"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 07:55:27+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671509
(No visible changes after review)
joost schouppe (2026-01-29 12:41:42+00:00): Je hebt hier dit gebouw https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1103801937/history als brandweer-dienst (amenity=firestation) aangeduid, waardoor er hier dus twee brandweerstations gemapped waren. Ik heb een en ander gefixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177845819
Dus de twee gebouwen van de kazerne worden building=firestation, en ik heb een nieuwe outline rond heel de site gezet met alle tags van de amenity
sembelst134 (2026-01-14 21:28:04+00:00): Hallo, nur als Hinweis weil ich zufällig die Zugangsbeschränkungen sehe.
Wenn du einen Weg mit access=no markierst, dann aber zb motocar=yes, hebst du die Beschränkung ja wieder auf. Zumindest verstehe ich den Grund dahinter nicht für diese Tag-Kombination
Tobermorit (2026-01-15 05:09:55+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Es ist natürlich ein vollständiges Betretungs- und Befahrverbot gemeint.
Ich werde es gleich korrigieren. 
Ich hatte die Änderungen mit vespucci gemacht und der scheint die fraglichen Tags (motorcar, motorcycle) gar nicht auszuwerten?? Deshalb war mir nicht aufgefallen, dass da noch etwas steht. Da muss ich nochmal genauer draufschauen.
Glassman (2026-01-14 18:50:39+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. Just a note that Google's license prohibits it use in OSM. Since you modified the rock from imagery, I'm assuming that you use the imagery to identify the road.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177206963
eggie (2026-01-14 13:04:10+00:00): Hoi,

Het paaltje heb ik verbonden met de weg.. anders geen effect in routering. Overigens is één paaltje voldoende.
Geef wel aan wat voor een soort paaltje het is.
bollard=removable, flexible, fixed?? 
Dit tbv hulpdiensten. 
MVG
eggie
donux-nl (2026-01-14 14:09:19+00:00): Volgens mijn foto vaste paaltjes, maar ik zal nog eens ter plaatse een inspectie doen. 
Heb twee paaltjes verwijderd.
eggie (2026-01-14 14:45:40+00:00): Top.. 
Kwaad kunnen die losse paaltjes ook niet.. als er maar één een verbinding heeft.
In Dordt zijn veel paaltjes vervangen door flexible. Daar rijd je zo overheen.
Voor je auto niet zo goed.. maar bezorgdiensten rijden er gewoon overheen.
mueschel (2026-01-18 10:37:17+00:00): Hi,
please check the gas stations you edited: "fuel:fuel:diesel:class2" is a mistake and should be "fuel:diesel:class2"
eggie (2026-01-14 13:01:28+00:00): Dag donux  Het gemeentehuis staat al getagd op de adresnode. Ik heb de regel townhall verwijderd.
Evt. kun je wat met ingangen doen als je ook van de westkant naar binnen kan.

MVG
eggie
donux-nl (2026-01-14 14:06:20+00:00): Er stond een tag building=civic op het gebouw. Is die wel juist dan? Of ook overbodig? Ik begreep dat er dan wel wat aan toegevoegd moet worden.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dcivic
eggie (2026-01-14 14:42:18+00:00): Volgens mij hoef je het niet aan te vullen.
Maar OSM Nederland is wel uniek. Wij hebben  nu eenmaal gekozen voor de adresnodes. Die hebben niet overal.
.. en dan nog de uitzonderingen zoals kerken. Dan weer de gebouwomtrek.
Het is niet zwartwit.
Groet..
eggie
bartgron (2026-01-14 18:21:21+00:00): To nie jest powód aby drogę zupełnie usuwać, przywróciłem drogę wraz z odpowiednimi tagami
bartgron (2026-01-14 18:21:41+00:00): Dodałem tag access=private który oznacza że droga jest prywatna
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-08 08:29:29+00:00): Removed SEO spam tags for POIs in changeset 183815366

https://osm.org/changeset/183815366
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-01-14 09:25:25+00:00): Lütfen hashtags=* etiketini ve description=* etiketini amacı dışında kullanmayınız. SEO amaçlı değişiklikler yapmayınız.
pwbriggs (2026-01-15 19:15:42+00:00): This looks good to me, thanks! My main note is that explicitly tagging roads as not one-way (oneway=no) is unnecessary-- it's assumed by nature of this being tagged as a roadway that it's two-way.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177207846
Luke_Vader (2026-01-15 21:22:42+00:00): Thank you for adding these to the map, it is much appreciated.
BTW, to have cleaner data in the future:
1. you can right click on the element you are adding and click the square to ensure all sides are 90 degrees
2. Common features such as these usually have standardised tags. 
in this case that would be:
amenity=parcel_locker
brand=POST Luxembourg
brand:wikidata=Q1570910
opening_hours=24/7 (since it's a 24/7 packup)
operator=POST Luxembourg
if you're curious, you can see how it is tagged now.

I realise it may be a lot, but these are just tips. What you added was perfectly good too.
Hope to see more edits by you in the future, cheers.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177207898
Glassman (2026-01-14 18:53:29+00:00): Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dbrownfield or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dconstruction for a more appropriate tag
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177208329
mavl (2026-01-15 16:01:21+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет непрямоугольное здание. На спутниковом снимке esri (которым вы пользовались) здание прямоугольное. Здание исправлено.
Ozon OSM10 (2026-01-17 19:38:46+00:00): Здравствуйте! Ошибку свою поняла, буду повнимательнее. Спасибо, что исправили.
pwbriggs (2026-01-14 22:28:03+00:00): re: your source tag -- please be careful not to include too much personal info.

Otherwise, these edits look good. Thanks for the work on this area!
jack walker2 (2026-01-14 11:03:08+00:00): 有错别字  1组打成了1住
osmviborg (2026-01-18 18:12:32+00:00): Det harmonerer vist ikke med denne afgørelse. https://mfkn.naevneneshus.dk/afgoerelse/13b7618c-a002-468d-bd07-2918e69f17a8
NikoJorj (2026-02-28 13:07:27+00:00): Qu'est-ce qui vous fait dire que https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/487057851 est privé? je n'y ai jamais vu aucun panneau ni colture.
osmmapper222 (2026-01-15 18:31:03+00:00): Hallo @01Groot,

befindet sich das Gebäude derzeit noch im Bau?

Auf den Luftbildern von Mapillary sieht es fertiggestellt aus.

Wenn noch Innenarbeiten etc. stattfinden, dann ist dies für OSM weniger relevant. Eher das hier ein Gebäude steht.
01Groot (2026-01-17 14:03:44+00:00): Ok, dann habe ich das wahrscheinlich falsch gemacht. die Fassade ist fertig allerdings drumherum noch Baustelle. Soll ich das wieder ändern?
osmmapper222 (2026-01-18 19:26:22+00:00): Hab ich schon gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177388361

building=construction nutze ich meistens, wenn in einem Neubaugebiet noch ein deutlicher Rohbau, z.b. ohne Dachstuhl erkennbar ist. Daher war das Tagging per se nicht falsch, hatte aber auch keinen Mehrwert für OSM in diesem Baustadium.
borovac (2026-01-14 09:18:04+00:00): Hi Pavel
The maxspeed tag should not be used together with maxspeed:backward and maxspeed:forward, as this results in incorrect tagging.
Please remove the redundant tags because they duplicate the data. TomTom already supports tagging with maxspeed:backward and maxspeed:forward, so the maxspeed tag itself is unnecessary.
Currently, you have maxspeed:forward=40, but according to your tagging, maxspeed:forward=50, which is incorrect and could mislead drivers into thinking they are allowed to drive faster than the legal limit.
BrackoNe (2026-01-14 09:19:22+00:00): Hey @pavel_shturm!

Thanks for the edits. I am not sure how familiar you are with OSM concepts, but OSM does not tailor data for specific apps.

Directional speed limits are used here because the limit differs in each direction. Please do not add a generic maxspeed tag over these directional limits, as it creates data conflicts.

Please acknowledge this message.
soliMM (2026-01-14 13:35:15+00:00): This has been fully reverted in changeset: 177219666

Considering this is 3rd or even 4th time that I'm reverting the exact same changes you are making to maxspeed values around Zlatibor, I would advise you to stop editing maxspeeds further until you familiarize yourself a bit more how OSM works and how to properly tag these. 

Because from your changeset comments it seems to me that you don't understand how OSM work and continue to make changes on OSM simply because certain application, device or car navigation is not properly consuming data from OSM. We are mapping the correct information that is present on the ground, not imaginary stuff and we certainly do not tailor it to specific app needs, so please stop with your current practices.

If you need help or some more explanation about how to map something in correct way, you can always ask around but simply insisting on certain changes, which are by the way not correct and are degrading OSM data, will yield no result.

In case you continue with current mapping practices and ignore comments from the community that were left on your changesets I will be forced to escalate this to DWG.

Happy mapping
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:23:06+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13455615310 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Math tutoring center in South Forsyth"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-25 07:55:28+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:23:08+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13455612710 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Hillman Beer brewery and restaurant in Asheville"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 08:03:00+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671649
(Only the affected tags were deleted; other unrelated data was left untouched)
trial (2026-01-14 22:00:12+00:00): Bonjour, "Hôtel de Ville" (et Ti-Kêr) c'est ce qui est écrit sur le bâtiment, Mairie de Caudan est donc un alt_name (Ti-Kêr Caodan un alt_name:br).
addr:city et add:postcode n'ont aucun intérêt (car donnés par la géométrie).
Si vous voulez mettre l'adresse, merci de préfixer par contact: et non addr: (les addr:* en France se placent à la limite privé/public).
mueschel (2026-01-15 15:47:44+00:00): Hi,
please check your edits - you added many "buildng" instead of the correct "building".
Rainero (2026-03-20 16:38:14+00:00): Revert mit changeset/180168179
(unzulässige Quelle)
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-24 05:19:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173034943/history/19 - takie zmiany trzeba omówić na forum przed ich zrobieniem

była jakaś rozmowa?

jak nie to nie zmieniaj klasy istotnych dróg
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-22 22:16:40+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19632
bartgron (2026-01-14 18:41:36+00:00): Czy ten parking na pewno zajmuje tak wielką powierzchnię?
bartgron (2026-03-13 13:43:19+00:00): Z racji braku odpowiedzi zestaw zmian został wycofany.
Pozdrawiam
watmildon (2026-03-08 00:04:31+00:00): I got to share this beautiful nonsense with someone today. So good.
soliMM (2026-01-14 13:18:47+00:00): This has been fully reverted in this changeset: 177219418
dmjab13 (2026-01-14 18:26:32+00:00): please do not submit changesets with a bounding box this large