piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Sam Wilson (2024-12-06 05:06:08+00:00): Hi, just wondering what the correct name for this hotel is, because it looks like it might be the Novotel Nairobi Westlands. Do you have a source for the Pullman name?

https://all.accor.com/hotel/9332/index.en.shtml#section-location
Sam Wilson (2024-12-09 23:36:34+00:00): I've updated it, and also added the hotel to Wikidata.
habi (2025-02-25 14:07:09+00:00): Ciao Sascha

I just stumbled over this changeset (because of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317821713 showing up 'wrong' in Go Map!! when having a walk during lunchtime).
Can you provide 'us' with a link to your rendering experiment?

Have a great day,
habi
stephenmartin (2025-01-01 11:32:41+00:00): Hello... the location you've added for "Tilmore Gardens" is in the wrong place. That suburb of Petersfield is called "Bell Hill". Tilmore Gardens is a road within the "Tilmore" suburb of Petersfield, although OSM has it marked as a Neighbourhood rather than a suburb. Your Borough Hill, Causeway and Heath Common locations are spot-on though.
martien-176 (2024-09-25 17:44:09+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. 

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. 

Please watch these 2 short video for more info: 
-Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
-Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ 

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157049206
ntzm (2024-09-26 14:39:01+00:00): I think this may have been an accident?
DaveF (2024-09-26 16:36:34+00:00): No, it's a "Test". Still in progress.
martien-176 (2024-09-25 17:39:47+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. 

Most of the buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. 

The imagery may fool you sometimes in that it seems a building has no square corners. You can use alternative imagery to double check.

Also please be cautious with deleting features. If a building is badly traced, do not delete, but fix it instead.

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157049308
habi (2024-11-27 09:24:12+00:00): Ciao enristuda007
Es macht keinen Sinn, den Schuttiplatz und die zwei Goals jeweils als Fussballfeld (leisure=pitch) zu erfassen.
Ich habe diese drei Knoten zu einem Fussballfeld zusammengefasst.
Ä Gruess us Bärn,
habi

PS: Ich war wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4533775 hier in der Gegend
Mazda05 (2024-09-25 16:38:16+00:00): Немає причин для перейменування
Mazda05 (2024-09-25 20:07:00+00:00): Ваші правки стосовно змін в найменуваннях з changeset #156819335 по #157049876 (цей) будуть або були скасовані по причинах: 1) немає підстав для перейменувань аеропортів, залізничних станцій, вокзалів, автобусних зупинок або інших об'єктів транспортного сполучення; 2) немає підстав для перейменування територіальних громад; 3) ви не зберігаєте історичні назви населенних пунктів, що мають бути перейменовані, що суперечить https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history; 4) ви робите зміни на підставі проекту постанови, а сама постанова є із змінами — у прийтнятый постанові інший перелік змін найменувань; 5) постанова про перейменування населених пунктів та районів https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3984-20 набирає чинності лише завтра, 26.09.2024, а ви зробили правки до набрання чинності постанови, з 19.09.2024 по 24.09.2024, тобто без підстав на це
mueschel (2024-09-29 08:56:40+00:00): Hi,
you used some new tags here, e.g. "plant:output:steam:max".  

"plant:output:steam" is usually the total output capacity of the plant, i.e. the maximum possible. What does the second output mean?
dmfr (2024-09-29 14:51:42+00:00): Hello! At that point I was trying to figure out how to express maximum power rating vs usual power production. I eventually realised OSM only has documented tags for the max power rating. So I'll fix this one, thanks for the heads-up!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-07 23:29:28+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164655836
ValidDistress (2024-10-06 20:07:53+00:00): Deze is reeds toegevoegd: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11276122461
Mappers_Delight (2024-10-07 17:42:29+00:00): Oei, merci om te fixen!
flohoff (2024-09-26 08:40:19+00:00): Moin,
weil ich den changeset gerade gesehen habe. 
Bitte keine Gebäude löschen die noch im ALKIS oder Luftbild zu sehen ist sondern die lifecycle tags verwenden.

In OWL/Kreis GT haben wir prozesse solche automatisiert zu finden. Wenn das Gebäude jetzt weg ist aber im ALKIS noch drin wird das hier möglicherweise schnell wieder nachgetragen.

Flo
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-25 19:38:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157099118 where the changeset comment is: revert railway crossing edits make in circumvention of block, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16712
Filip009CZ (2024-10-21 17:57:58+00:00): #mapycz user report #2669557 - Na ceste č. 552 v okrese Michalovce, pri obci Vojany, je most cez kanál prejazdný v jednom jazdnom pruhu, kde premavka je riadená svetelnou signalizáciou.

Máte k tomu nejaké info? Resp. prečo tam je access=no?
Liqid1010 (2024-10-21 18:24:50+00:00): Bol som tam ale nevidím, že by niekde bolo access=no. Viete spresniť čo sa pýtate? Most je prejazdný tak ako píšete
Filip009CZ (2024-10-21 19:06:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1229533100
Je tam motor_vehicle=no
Filip009CZ (2024-10-21 19:07:09+00:00): Aj keď je to od predchádzajúceho editujúceho, ale asi máte novšie informácie.
Liqid1010 (2024-10-21 19:10:20+00:00): Áno, to mi tam omylom ostalo pri mojich zmenách, nevšimol som si to. Ďakujem
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-25 19:37:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157099118 where the changeset comment is: revert railway crossing edits make in circumvention of block, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16712
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-25 19:37:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157099118 where the changeset comment is: revert railway crossing edits make in circumvention of block, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16712
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-25 19:37:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157099118 where the changeset comment is: revert railway crossing edits make in circumvention of block, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16712
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-25 19:37:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157099118 where the changeset comment is: revert railway crossing edits make in circumvention of block, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16712
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-25 19:37:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157099118 where the changeset comment is: revert railway crossing edits make in circumvention of block, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16712
DressyPear4 (2024-09-30 00:13:10+00:00): Por que foi deletado os pontos da via colocando por cima das casas?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157051448
olia_fix (2025-03-03 11:38:44+00:00): Thank you for fixing
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157051532
eggie (2024-09-24 19:46:35+00:00): Tip.. in dat geval kunnen de uitzonderingen voor tweewielers verwijderd worden.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2024-09-24 19:47:14+00:00): .. op het gedeelte van oneway=no
eggie (2024-09-24 20:43:35+00:00): aangepast
YyellowW (2024-09-25 02:46:55+00:00): Fantastisch! Bedankt weer!!
Groeten, Ronny.
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-25 19:38:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157099118 where the changeset comment is: revert railway crossing edits make in circumvention of block, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16712
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-25 19:38:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157099118 where the changeset comment is: revert railway crossing edits make in circumvention of block, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16712
nurdafur (2026-04-02 05:02:42+00:00): Hallo Surrli
Du hast in diesem Changeset und bestimmt auch noch in anderen Trottoirs zugefügt. Wenn du das machst solltest du den sidewalk-tag der entsprechenden Strasse auch noch anpassen. Sonst sind die Trottoirs dann doppelt vorhanden.
Zusätzlich kann auch noch ein foot=use_sidepath an die Strasse gehängt werden.
An einigen Stellen, über die ich jetzt gerade gestolpert bin, habe ich die Anpassung schon vorgenommen.
Liebe Grüsse und weiterhin viel Spass beim kartographieren.
Urs
surrli (2026-04-08 16:34:21+00:00): Grüezi Urs
Danke für den Hinweis. Ja, ich habe seperate Trottoirs erfasst um eine neue Software von einem Kollegen eine Grundlage zu bieten. Diese berechnet anhand der OSM-Karten die besten Schulwege für die Kinder. Und da ist es wichtig, dass die Kinder möglichst wenig die Strasse queren sollen. Mit diesen Daten werden die Schulzuteilungen berechnet, so dass möglichst sichere Schulwege geplant werden. 
Ich werde mich daran halten und im gleichen Arbeitsschritt jeweils die Attribute bei den Strassen prüfen und gegebenfalls anpassen. 
Es grüsst dich
Andreas
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-25 19:37:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157099118 where the changeset comment is: revert railway crossing edits make in circumvention of block, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16712
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-25 19:37:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157099118 where the changeset comment is: revert railway crossing edits make in circumvention of block, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16712
eggie (2024-09-24 18:51:33+00:00): Hint... Just draw an other line round the parking_spaces and tag that wit
amenity=parking
parking=street_side
orientation=parallel

That will give the P rendering.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-09-24 18:54:26+00:00): ... so.. just one large rectangle on top of the four parking_spaces. 
Look what I did with te left parking. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space
acirep (2024-09-24 19:07:30+00:00): Ok I did that, here is latest changeset

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157053576
eggie (2024-09-24 19:29:29+00:00): I noticed... It's okay.
Enjoy mapping
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-25 19:38:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157099118 where the changeset comment is: revert railway crossing edits make in circumvention of block, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16712
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-24 18:30:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/915144178

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-24 18:40:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/912898014

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-25 19:37:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157099118 where the changeset comment is: revert railway crossing edits make in circumvention of block, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16712
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-25 19:37:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157099118 where the changeset comment is: revert railway crossing edits make in circumvention of block, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16712
Dvorný (2024-09-24 18:42:31+00:00): Mapa byla zakreslena díky povolení Jana Fukátka, který les mapoval.
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-25 19:37:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157099118 where the changeset comment is: revert railway crossing edits make in circumvention of block, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16712
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-25 19:37:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157099118 where the changeset comment is: revert railway crossing edits make in circumvention of block, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16712
woodpeck_repair (2024-11-13 21:05:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159107632 where the changeset comment is: revert un-trustworthy/fictional golf mapping
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-25 19:38:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157099118 where the changeset comment is: revert railway crossing edits make in circumvention of block, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16712
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-25 19:38:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157099118 where the changeset comment is: revert railway crossing edits make in circumvention of block, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16712
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-25 19:37:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157099118 where the changeset comment is: revert railway crossing edits make in circumvention of block, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16712
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-25 19:37:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157099118 where the changeset comment is: revert railway crossing edits make in circumvention of block, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16712
mtmail (2024-09-26 21:14:41+00:00): Hallo. Das Wasserwerk bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/696138530 ist vermutlich ein https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dwater_works
Frohes Wandern
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-25 19:37:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157099118 where the changeset comment is: revert railway crossing edits make in circumvention of block, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16712
addyx (2024-10-03 09:11:29+00:00): Thanks for fixing this. Though, ideally, just https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156727043 should have been reverted.

Swiggy armchair mappers keep messing up the correct data.
Wise_Turtle (2024-09-24 20:26:07+00:00): Удаление своей правки.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157055952
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-25 19:38:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157099118 where the changeset comment is: revert railway crossing edits make in circumvention of block, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16712
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-25 19:37:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157099118 where the changeset comment is: revert railway crossing edits make in circumvention of block, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16712
GerdP (2024-10-16 09:22:40+00:00): Hi!
Auf einem Foto vom Weg https://www.osm.org/way/1302641172  sehe ich etwa hier 52.8790935, 8.8734279
einen Schaltkasten und ein Schild DE:240,1022-11 (Geh+Radweg + Mofa frei). Mein Foto ist vom 18.7. 
Du hast dann hier aus dem highway=path einen highway=footway gemacht. Das beisst sich mit bicycle=designated.
Ich vermute mal, dass das Schild noch da steht? Dann sollte der Weg auch hw=path bleiben und meinetwegen ein path=sidewalk bekommen.
jakobend (2024-10-16 10:00:23+00:00): Hi, du hast natürlich Recht, zwischen den beiden Grundstücken 2 und 2a steht 240 + 1022-11. Mofas frei habe ich bisher so selten gesehen, dass ich genauer hinschauen musste. Warum man auf die Idee kommt, diese Kombi mitten auf einen wenige Meter kurzen, recht schmalen Bürgersteig zu setzen statt sie zum Ortsausgang zu ziehen ist mir schleierhaft, aber ich korrigiere das dann natürlich. Danke für die Qualitätssicherung!
GerdP (2024-10-16 10:08:45+00:00): Danke!
Ausserhalb geschl. Ortschaften dürfen Mofa-Fahrer wohl immer den Radweg benutzten. Ich denke also, dass man verhindern wollte, dass die dann am Ortsschild plötzlich die Seite wechseln. Wo Du die Hausnummern erwähnst: Da fehlen in Heiligenfelde (und nicht nur dort) ja noch jede Menge. Ich nehme auf meinen Radtouren immer mal wieder ein paar auf, aber das ist halt sehr zeitraubend und daher mach ich das eher auf dem Land.
muzirian (2024-09-30 22:00:55+00:00): Hi Joy, this w1317959472 look like a residential road, removing it. 

if you wanna talk to other mappers in blr, please join osm_blr on telegram or Matrix matrix.to/#/#osm-bengaluru:matrix.org
eggie (2024-09-24 19:18:18+00:00): Yep... okay..
I only merged the nodes.
CTRL-F5  for emty your cache to speed up the rendering. 
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-09-24 19:21:50+00:00): To be honest I never add parking_space :)

But it's ofcourse better to point out disabled parking_space
eggie (2024-09-24 20:41:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
silversurfer83 (2024-09-27 20:06:23+00:00): hi
du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht.

Passt so, denke ich. Wenn du es besonders gut machen möchtest, machst du da eine enforcment relation hin...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:enforcement
Aber den Punkt erstmal so in die Gegend zu setzen reicht auch erstmal :)

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157053650
tevildo_ (2024-09-24 21:12:21+00:00): Hi, did you survey this? Are you sure the wood should be deleted? Also are you sure your imagery is up to date and appropriately georeferenced?
tevildo_ (2024-09-24 21:17:06+00:00): Asking because I see deviations in both land use and feature location from the 2023 georeferenced aerophoto of Sofia, AND the official cadastral data.
tevildo_ (2024-09-24 21:20:26+00:00): https://i.imgur.com/MMvv0Oz.png
VictorIE (2024-10-25 01:51:51+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317963376

What is this line?
Jordi MF (2024-09-25 18:36:19+00:00): Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).
El usuario realiza múltiples y pequeñas ediciones para dificultar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados. Los mayores errores son que modifica la toponimia oficial para que no aparezca en valenciano aunque así lo dictamine la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua en la cartografía oficial de la Comunitat Valenciana. Tenemos permiso explícito de esta entidad que, según las leyes autonómicas, es la entidad encargada de la toponimia oficial. Tampoco no tiene en cuenta la cartelería local que aparece en calles, carreteras y sendas.
Por otra parte, este usuario (y todas sus cuentas) está mapeando según las ortofotos y sin tener en cuenta el conocimiento local para delimitar si los elementos se tratan de edificios en ruinas, muros u otros elementos e, incluso, elimina PDIs con todo el historial de forma injustificada.
Ante todo lo expuesto y por las diversas anomalías, revierto todos los changesets porque, de revisar cada uno de ellos, únicamente nos dedicaríamos a ello, como si fuésemos administradores. En caso de revisar todas las ediciones de este usuario que ya ha sido bloqueado por 10 años con otras cuentas, nunca podríamos seguir mejorando la base de datos debido a revisar durante horas cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157096807
CurlingMan13 (2024-09-25 19:18:53+00:00): "Q" should be used to square the buildings and give them right angle corners.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157054193
CurlingMan13 (2024-09-25 19:19:42+00:00): Also, driveways should be connected to the roadways and mapped as a driveway, not cartpaths.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157054193
5m4u9 (2024-09-25 04:17:26+00:00): Hola, bienvenid@! 

Tengo una duda, esta área que dices cuartel tiene algo que ver con el otro situado en la Calle Calama? es un anexo? oficinas o instrucción?
Wilmichu (2024-09-28 00:33:12+00:00): Si. Los Colorados de Bolivia tiene dos batallones con sus  respectivos cuarteles, uno de ellos es el de Villa Pabón, el que se lo conoce como Mirador.
5m4u9 (2024-09-28 02:39:28+00:00): Bien. por flojo no busqué en wikipedia y como me explicas aclara muy bien. añadiré sus nombres alternativos al mapa 

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorados_de_Bolivia
Filip009 (2024-09-25 04:06:24+00:00): Zdravím, neviem či https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431265458 úplne sedí na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=bandstand prečítajte si to a dajte vedieť
InsertUser (2024-09-25 01:37:59+00:00): This seems to have affected quite a few relations as well as the two buildings. Were the relation edits meant to have a different changeset comment?
fortera_au (2024-09-25 11:27:20+00:00): Relation edits appear to be a reversion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157015889
trigpoint (2024-09-25 11:47:06+00:00): Whoops, my mistake didn't clear josm first.
I have reverted this
fortera_au (2024-09-25 12:06:57+00:00): Yeah I guessed it was an accident, thanks for fixing it up!
HellMap (2025-04-17 17:24:57+00:00): Čau. Kādēļ šai pārejai ir access=no ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317965212 Es šeit it kā nekādas aizlieguma zīmes neredzu. Vai te kaut kas cits bija uz to brīdi? Vai tas joprojām aktuāli?
Mister_R2 (2025-04-17 20:16:51+00:00): Es pievienoju to, jo īsti nesapratu vai ņemt pāreju vispār nost vai likt access=no, jo tur zemāka pāreja no ietves uz ielu nav, bet es domāju atstāt un tikai piezīmēt ka nevar.
https://mapillary.com/map/im/692443976309828
HellMap (2025-04-17 20:55:40+00:00): Pazeminājums tur ir - kreisajā pusē dažas bildes uz priekšu (bet arī bez tā, ietves beigas parasti savieno ar ceļu, lai maršrutēšana strādātu). Labajā pusē gan nav speciālas, bet "savienojas" ar iebraucamo ceļu. Šajā vietā var likt gan ietves turpinājumu/savienojumu, gan kā nemarķētu pāreju - `crossing=unmarked`. Latvijā tādu "pāreju" ir diezgan daudz (un arī tādas, kas tikai vienā pusē ceļam). `access` ceļiem tomēr ir oficiāliem ierobežojumiem. Un pārejai klāt vēl var likt, ka bez ceļa apzīmējumiem, lai maršrutētāji to neprioritizētu.
CurlingMan13 (2024-09-25 19:20:40+00:00): Also, driveways should be connected to the roadways and mapped as a driveway, not cartpaths

Buildings should be squared to the sides are parallel/perpendicular with 90deg corners.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157054512