piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2025-04-14 00:57:24+00:00): Check Changeset: 164916878 to see how I mapped one of these instead.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483145
Gregory Peony (2025-03-31 15:14:53+00:00): I see you tried to improve some of your contributions here, that's good but you deleted an accurate footprint you previously mapped. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483183
Hufkratzer (2024-11-23 20:50:33+00:00): Hi,
das ist ein Reitplatz und keine Reitanlage (im SInne von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding).  Reitplätze werden in OSM normalerwiese mit leisure=pitch + sport=horse_riding getaggt und in iD gibt es auch ein Preset, was das macht - mit dem Namen "Reitplatz".
Gregory Peony (2025-04-14 17:16:30+00:00): The footpritnt I flagged here outlines multiple buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483327
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 16:22:39+00:00): The footprints I flagged here have odd and inaccurate shaped. check to see if a building's footprint could be accurately mapped using simple shapes before considering more unique options. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483385
HellMap (2024-11-23 10:32:36+00:00): Šo izmaiņu atcēlu. Nevar dzēst ārā elementus, kas ir iezīmēti jau 15 gadus, lai veiktu minimālas pārbīdes. Arī baznīcas atrodas kapu teritorijā kā komplekss, nevis izgrieztas no kapu kontūras. No kāda avota šāds secinājums?
Gregory Peony (2025-07-15 02:18:16+00:00): The footprints I flagged envelope multiple buildings. Each footprint should represent one building. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483560
Gregory Peony (2025-04-19 00:45:51+00:00): The footprints I flagged represent the light and dark side of a gabbled roof i.e. you added 2 footprints for one building. Consider common roof shapes when mapping and how they look when lit in different ways.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483667
Gregory Peony (2025-04-03 20:44:09+00:00): some of these footprints envelope multiple buildings and are therefore invalid. Footprints should represent individual buildings. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483704
Gregory Peony (2025-03-31 15:09:08+00:00): These footprints are inaccurate. Check if simpler geometries like quadrilaterals and circles represent a building well before trying alternative solutions. Mony of te footprints here outline barriers which may also cast shadows; map what you are certain is a building and use that data to inform your interpretation of imagery. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483730
Gregory Peony (2025-07-13 00:43:33+00:00): Overall a good contribution. The footpritns are generally valid and accurate. The highways and residential areas have been modified to avoid data overlap issues.--- Highways should follow the centre of the road in the imagery. The round footprint you mapped should be square because it has a blue roof its shape can be better seen in Bing --- Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483751
Gregory Peony (2025-04-22 23:27:47+00:00): All footpritns here are valid and most are accurate. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483875
Gregory Peony (2025-04-04 03:05:57+00:00): You added a name to this residential area. Do you know its name, or was this accidental?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483919
Gregory Peony (2025-03-26 02:16:15+00:00): You deleted existing footprints and replaced them with new ones. I this instance I think that was a good choice becasue they were only a day old and had no prior history. The vast majority of footprints are accurate and valid. Use alternate sources to aid your interpretation. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483945
Gregory Peony (2025-04-03 04:14:33+00:00): Only add name tags to features if they have a name. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483959
Gregory Peony (2025-04-18 19:20:10+00:00): Looks like you identified buildings in imagery but tagged them with a name instead. The name tag is used for the name of a feature e.g. name=Eiffel Tower. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159484057
Gregory Peony (2025-04-18 19:24:55+00:00): Resolved in Changeset: 165127791
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159484057
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 00:20:00+00:00): You correctly differentiated between round and square buildings. The round building has been appropriately rounded but the square buildings have not been squared and tend to have odd shapes. I recommend watching the missing maps beginer mistakes youtube videos.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159484189
somehundred (2024-11-23 08:14:48+00:00): Neviena no iezīmētajām līnijām sporta laukumos nav siena, taču ielikts ir barrier=wall.

Izlasiet lūdzu šo, lai saprastu, kam tieši ir domāta birka barrier=wall: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dwall

Ar šo arī noderīgi iepazīties: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
HellMap (2024-11-23 10:07:33+00:00): Kā tieši zināms, ka https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1337058748 ir privāta stāvvieta un ka tā vispār ir stāvvieta (mašīnu tur nav)?

Kādēļ izdzēsts šis ceļš https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/930810657/history ? Tas bija sen atpakaļ iezīmēts neprecīzi, bet tas eksistē https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1986358531830713&focus=photo
HellMap (2024-11-23 10:14:58+00:00): Kā tieši zināms, ka https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1337062407 ir privāta stāvvieta?

Ja esošie elementi nav precīzi un ir ar nobīdi, lūdzu tos pabīdīt/izlabot pirms zīmēt klāt vēl elementus. Piemēram, ap https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1337062408, kur sen iezīmētais celiņš ir šķībs, tagad arī apkārt viss ir ļoti nobīdīts ortofoto un nākotnes labojumi būs grūtāki, jo viss jāpārbīda. Plus Bing ortofoto nobīde.
HellMap (2024-11-23 09:54:25+00:00): Lūdzu uz asfalta ortofoto redzamus veidojumus kā https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1337065349 nezīmēt kā atsevišķus ceļus. Tie nav nodalīti gājēju ceļi ar fiziskām barjerām starp tiem.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
PinRPG (2024-11-23 07:24:46+00:00): Can you check the other edits by the same user? They're also questionable.
Allison P (2024-11-23 07:29:56+00:00): Reverted
Kseniya Kerimova (2026-07-28 11:19:30+00:00): Здравствуйте, уточните пожалуйста источник данных строений: существует ли здание. На космоснимках и панорамах здание отсутствует. Спасибо
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:15:17+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659495
Hadi Omid (2024-11-28 02:57:19+00:00): سلام
لطفا قبل از ویرایش نقشه، آموزش ببینید که نقشه رو خراب نکنید.
با تشکر
HellMap (2024-11-23 09:44:42+00:00): Ķā tieši zināms, ka https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/863794457 ir privāta stāvvieta?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 01:25:26+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164876737
HellMap (2024-11-23 09:43:27+00:00): Lūdzu ņem vērā, ka Bing ortofoto ir nobīde, vietās iespējams pāri metram. Pirms pievienot jaunus vai pārvietot esošos elementus, tas ir redaktorā jānolīdzina. Un dažādās vietās var būt dažāda nobīde.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_aerial_imagery#iD

Šajā gadījumā, visi šie zāles gabali ir ar kādu 1.5 metru nobīdi.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:15:18+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659495
Jordi MF (2024-11-23 18:06:02+00:00): Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).
El usuario realiza múltiples y pequeñas ediciones para dificultar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados. Los mayores errores son que modifica la toponimia oficial para que no aparezca en valenciano aunque así lo dictamine la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua en la cartografía oficial de la Comunitat Valenciana. Tenemos permiso explícito de esta entidad que, según las leyes autonómicas, es la entidad encargada de la toponimia oficial. Tampoco no tiene en cuenta la cartelería local que aparece en calles, carreteras y sendas.
Por otra parte, este usuario (y todas sus cuentas) está mapeando según las ortofotos y sin tener en cuenta el conocimiento local para delimitar si los elementos se tratan de edificios en ruinas, muros u otros elementos e, incluso, elimina PDIs con todo el historial de forma injustificada.
Ante todo lo expuesto y por las diversas anomalías, revierto todos los changesets porque, de revisar cada uno de ellos, únicamente nos dedicaríamos a ello, como si fuésemos administradores. En caso de revisar todas las ediciones de este usuario que ya ha sido bloqueado por 10 años con otras cuentas, nunca podríamos seguir mejorando la base de datos debido a revisar durante horas cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159509995
RaphaelPasloin (2024-11-23 11:58:41+00:00): Hello,

Do you read and show (tv) the source i cited in my previous changeset ? 

The document you mentionned show the Rue de Montserrat and mention "Slag van de Marol" in Montserratsaat. Also in French the document you mention talk abou "bataille des Marolles" no "de".

I make also a historical comparaison where the covent was , the centroid you placed simply doesn"t exist at the moment of the appellation.

So moving in Rue aux Laines when you cited a article about Montseratstraat is realy strange and i ask you to read and watch all source i cited and roll back the position i placed.

Thanks in advance,
have a good day.
RaphaelPasloin (2024-11-23 12:07:13+00:00): => moment of appellation i mean when historicaly the denomination start to exist and before the first expropriation for the construction of the courthouse, reason i mentionned as a historical neightbourouht when i corrected the place.
JhowieNitnek (2024-11-23 16:41:57+00:00): I trust a official gov site more then a tv show
RaphaelPasloin (2024-11-26 03:04:39+00:00): Thanks for responding, you obviously don't read the sources i provided before you make the changeset. 

It's  a little ironic you say trusted more a official gov site when you cited as source justification for the name in French in this changeset comments : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158914049

Because the notice of Urban Brussels don't talk about "La Marolle" and just describe what Rue de Montserrat is and the delimatation. Even in NL it's not clear that they talking about the delimitation of "De Marolle"  

In the documents i provided from "cercle d'histoire" , ARAU or Arhiviris , if you know the neightbourout and make a minimum of overlapp/comparaison with local knowledge my move is correct and just moving it with one source that clearly one word guessing with one source for the notice is a lack of critical thinking in your changeset. 
(it's not because it's on a offial website that it exist , for exemple http://sites.heritage.brussels/fr/trees/6886 )

The first adding of the node already warm up  attention of another mappers, i haven't react on that time as i knowing the name for decade and i have choosen not to add it personnaly as i consider it as a historical denomination more an actual usage. You put it anyway i respect your choose but if i make correction please don't just move this with one source and not reading sources i provided.

Also even permiters of "les Marolles" has some contestation (see "Les rues disparues de Bruxelles" aux éditions Rossel, 1979) not sure adding more confusion on the map by placing the node on limit is a good think.

I again ask you to reconsider this edit and at least moving the node on the location i placed in my previous changeset or consider that ground verifiability is not possible and delete it.
Jordi MF (2024-11-23 18:05:01+00:00): Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).
El usuario realiza múltiples y pequeñas ediciones para dificultar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados. Los mayores errores son que modifica la toponimia oficial para que no aparezca en valenciano aunque así lo dictamine la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua en la cartografía oficial de la Comunitat Valenciana. Tenemos permiso explícito de esta entidad que, según las leyes autonómicas, es la entidad encargada de la toponimia oficial. Tampoco no tiene en cuenta la cartelería local que aparece en calles, carreteras y sendas.
Por otra parte, este usuario (y todas sus cuentas) está mapeando según las ortofotos y sin tener en cuenta el conocimiento local para delimitar si los elementos se tratan de edificios en ruinas, muros u otros elementos e, incluso, elimina PDIs con todo el historial de forma injustificada.
Ante todo lo expuesto y por las diversas anomalías, revierto todos los changesets porque, de revisar cada uno de ellos, únicamente nos dedicaríamos a ello, como si fuésemos administradores. En caso de revisar todas las ediciones de este usuario que ya ha sido bloqueado por 10 años con otras cuentas, nunca podríamos seguir mejorando la base de datos debido a revisar durante horas cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159509970
superstition railway (2024-11-25 03:44:20+00:00): Snow covers are not glaciers. Please read before editing glaciers:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=glacier#How_to_map
dcapillae (2024-11-23 08:51:05+00:00): Cada contenedor se destina a un tipo de residuo diferente, no se deben mezclar.

Contenedor azul (papel y cartón):
recycling:paper=yes
recycling:magazines=yes
recycling:cardboard=yes
recycling:newspaper=yes
recycling:paper_packaging=yes

Contenedor amarillo (latas, envases y botellas de plástico):
recycling:plastic_packaging=yes
recycling:plastic_bottles=yes
recycling:cans=yes

Contenedor verde (botellas de cristal):
recycling:glass_bottles=yes
thetornado76 (2025-09-03 19:06:02+00:00): Hello,
You have entered several meadow=pad and meadow=padd. I suspect that this should be paddock and was typed too quickly in iD. I have already corrected a few. Please check these entries again.
Regards, thetornado76
Palgrave Peter (2025-09-04 09:17:20+00:00): Thanks for spotting this. I will look for further errors and correct.
Sammyhawkrad (2024-11-23 11:05:59+00:00): Hi Greenhouseintdevgh,
Welcome to OSM. Your changeset comment raises eyebrows. Do these POIs actually exist here, or are you just testing how to add things to OSM? Hoping it's the former.
 
Besides that, a better way to add many POIs in a single building is to add each one as a node (point). They are not separate buildings in one building.

Best,
Sam
HellMap (2024-11-23 10:25:31+00:00): Kā jau vairākas reizes minēts, lūdzu nedzēst esošos elementus pirms zīmēt jaunus, bet pēc iespējas rediģēt esošos. Elementu vēsture pazūd un vairs nevar saprast no kā kas ir zīmēts kurā brīdī. Šeit jau vairākas reizes tas ir darīts. Šeit pilnīgi noteikti nebija jādzēš piemēram sporta kompleksa teritorija https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908918215/history. Piemēram, tika izdzēsti elementi kā https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1319098825/history un tā vietā iezīmēti https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1337089874 bez šīs informācijas. Velotrase no jaunākā ortofoto zīmēta jau 2 reizes ir nodzēsta. Šo izmaiņu jau var sākt uzskatīt par masveida dzēšanu un atcelt pilnībā, jo elementi nemaz nav pārzīmēti tajā pašā izmaiņā. Lūdzu atjaunot visus datus.
Layft Greater (2026-02-04 06:44:11+00:00): relation not needed. simple building-part outlines is enough

corrected 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12367229636/history#map=19/34.687923/33.043493&layers=N
hellovizart (2024-11-27 14:54:53+00:00): do we need to undo this edit?
eggie (2024-11-23 10:58:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
rene78 (2024-11-23 15:17:59+00:00): Hi Thomas,

nachmittags hat Hörgeräte Müller auch geöffnet. Ich  habe es zu 09:00-13:00,14:00-18:00; Sa 09:00-13:00; Su,PH off korrigiert.

Gruss
Rene
thomas_bo (2024-11-23 18:17:14+00:00): Hi Rene,

da muss ich mich beim schnellen Eingeben wohl vertan haben.
Danke für die Korrektur!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-11 15:02:53+00:00): to what this SQ at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12367240232/history refers to? Entrance? Entire building? Something else?
Marek-M (2024-11-23 12:03:07+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za cenne edycje.

Mam prośbę, żebyś w nazwie POI umieszczał tylko taką część nazwy zakładu, która ja wyróżnia od innych a opis rodzaju działalności pomijał lub dodawał do dodatkowego tagu `description=*` - rodzaj działalności wynika z głównego tagu `amenity` lub `shop`, które już dodałeś w prawidłowy sposób. Jako przykłady podrzucę te miejsca:
* https://www.osm.org/node/12367262223 - name=Gabinet kosmetyczny "Natalia"
name=Natalia (gabinet kosmetyczny w OSM to shop=beauty)
* https://www.osm.org/node/12367262224 - name=Salon fryzjerski Olga Wojciulewicz
name=Olga Wojciulewicz (fryzjer/salon fryzjerski w OSM to shop=hairdresser)
* https://www.osm.org/node/12367262225 - name=Salon optyczny Ziółkowscy
name=Ziółkowscy (salon optyczny w OSM to shop=optician)
* https://www.osm.org/node/12367262226 - name=Salon fryzjerski dla psów "Wiki"
name=Wiki (salon fryzjerski dla zwierząt w OSM to shop=pet_grooming)

Inne POI, które wczoraj dodawałeś już zmieniłem, te też mogę zmienić jeżeli nie chcesz na to poświęcać swojego czasu. Przy dodawaniu nowych lub edytowaniu POI proszę zwróć na to uwagę. Zbyt długie opisy nazw powodują, że mapy stają się mało czytelne a dodatkowo dublują informacje zawarte w innym tagu.
totera (2024-11-23 22:18:16+00:00): Hi SekeRob, why did you tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12367294624 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12367294652 as stop=all?
I don't think there are any all-way stop (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All-way_stop) in Italy, but these certainly aren't.
SekeRob (2024-11-24 07:45:04+00:00): Gokd moaning ;o)

Interesting read, has no effect on routing since its tagged on a stop spot point rather than a junction crossing seen often in the US. A OSM wiki conspicuously absent, it is a tag part of a preset with all and minor as options. Curiously, checking taginfo/overpass, the use is plastered all over Italy, a few actually on a crossing, unlikely, where traffic light are often mapped , AND the rest of Europe. AFA Italy is concerned, think the tag can go, absent of any effect on navigators, albeit here, obligatory stopping is rarely abided by, all driving with a little angel on both shoulders. So please remove this excess tag

Ciao
Vincentdesgms (2024-11-23 10:01:16+00:00): Intégration des adresses et non pas code FANTOIR comme indiqué par erreur
marc__marc (2024-11-23 11:07:25+00:00): Bonjour,
dans la base il y a quelques personnes qui ont ajouté training=acting
cela se rrajoute tout en bas à gauche dans la boite texte contenant tous les attributs
Cordialement,
Marc
nevw (2024-11-25 01:45:41+00:00): Hi, osmi finds this incomplete
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.00854&lat=-36.83333&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
nevw (2024-11-25 06:08:44+00:00): I have fixed it.
HellMap (2024-11-23 10:46:29+00:00): Velotrase https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1337101767/history jau bija iezīmēta precīzi no jaunākā ortofoto, kuru tu vēlāk izdzēsi.