piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2023-11-03 20:17:02+00:00): You mistakenly doubled back on the driveway. I fixed it and tagged it as a highway=service + service=driveway. Also removed the name. 

I also squared the building by selecting the outline then just typed a "q".

one question - the building is named Rosin Ranch. You should also add a tag to describe the type of business is located in the building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143551745
zstadler (2023-11-03 06:38:39+00:00): Hello mapperman123

Please review the OSM guidelines related to mapping of temporary events

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features
zstadler (2023-11-05 08:05:16+00:00): Hello mapperman123,

We understand that as a new mapper, you may not be familiar with the OSM mapping guidelines, and we try to help.
Please respond to the comments you receive from fellow OSM mappers.

Please clarify the source of the "Gaza Strip Under Israeli Control" data.

You state "https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3d/October_2023_Gaza%E2%88%92Israel_conflict.svg" as the source, but none of its versions look like what was mapped in OSM
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:October_2023_Gaza%E2%88%92Israel_conflict.svg&offset=&limit=500#filehistory

If Wikipedia is indeed the source, then this is not a permitted source for OSM mapping. See "Importing geodata from Wikipedia into OSM" at 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Collaboration_with_Wikipedia#Importing_geodata_from_Wikipedia_into_OSM

Thanks,
Zeev
zstadler (2023-11-05 08:19:32+00:00): This is a Hebrew translation of the previous message.

זהו תרגום לעברית של ההודעה הקודמת

שלום
mapperman123,

אנחנו מבינים שעקרונות המיפוי ב
OSM
לא ברורים תמיד לממפים חדשים, ואנחנו מנסים לעזור. אנא ענה/י להערות שקבלת

אנא הבהיר/י את המקור של "רצועת עזה תחת שליטה ישראלית"
תגית המקור מציינת את 
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3d/October_2023_Gaza%E2%88%92Israel_conflict.svg
אבל אף אחד מהגרסאות שמופיעה שם
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:October_2023_Gaza%E2%88%92Israel_conflict.svg&offset=&limit=500#filehistory
לא דומה לגרסה שמיפית ב
OSM

אם אכן וויקיפדיה היא המקור למיפוי, אז זהו אינו מקור מורשה למיפוי ב
OSM
על פי
"Importing geodata from Wikipedia into OSM" 
בדף
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Collaboration_with_Wikipedia#Importing_geodata_from_Wikipedia_into_OSM

בברכה,
זאב
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 10:45:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 143687400 where the changeset comment is: Entfernung von Edits eines selbst-gelöschten Users
woodpeck (2023-11-02 23:41:50+00:00): Many of the buildings added in this changeset are not visible on the imagery "Bing Maps Aerial" which is listed as a source in the changeset tags. On further edits please specify the data source you were using - were you tracing from aerial imagery, and if yes, then which imagery, and if not, then how did you know where the buildings are?
DavidKarlas (2023-11-03 08:16:33+00:00): @woodpeck I'm not sure I 100% agree, if you look closely at https://osmcha.org/changesets/143552192/
This changeset added only buildings in top right corner of changeset bounding box, not in bottom right, where buildings are bogus...
I did delete a lot of bogus buildings...
woodpeck (2023-11-03 08:31:25+00:00): What precisely is it that you do not agree with? I said that many of the buildings added in this changeset are not visible on Bing aerial imagery. Are you saying that the buildings added *are* actually visible on the imagery and therefore Bing is a credible source for this addition?
DavidKarlas (2023-11-03 09:29:48+00:00): In original comment you said that many buildings are not visible on "Bing Maps Aerial", I'm just saying they all are, I'm not saying this is good or bad source for tracing buildings.
If you load following Overpass query into JOSM and turn on Bing as imagery buildings are clearly visible:
[out:json][timeout:25];
way["building"](8.2612164,17.3854966,8.2630295,17.3875230)(newer:"2023-11-01T00:00:00Z");
(._;>;);
out skel qt;
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-07 22:14:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 144882292, 144882293, 144882267, 144882294, 144882250, 144882242, 144882274, 144882236, 144882261, 144882290 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism in the Eastern Mediterranean
map per (2023-11-03 08:44:25+00:00): Hello AveryMarcussen,

a garage should be tagged as building=garage instead of building=house.

Best regards
map per
map per (2023-11-03 08:45:18+00:00): This is a framyard and not farmland
map per (2023-11-03 08:46:48+00:00): Why did you delete the  Harris-Lake Park School (1)?

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/851910245/history
map per (2023-11-03 08:57:56+00:00): Hello AveryMarcussen,

and welcome to the OpenStreetMap Wiki project.

you received a lot of questions, suggestions and complaints abut your changes, but didn't respond to any of these comments. You can find an overview of the comments here: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=20493288. Please read and answer these comment before you do further map edits.

Im writing this twice, as a comment to a changeset and as a private message to increase the chances that you receive this message.

Thanks and best regards
map per
JbbDE (2023-11-07 17:41:14+00:00): Ist das wirklich nur noch ein Parkhaus von Segula? Vor Ort hängen noch Opel Schilder...
DressyPear4 (2023-11-03 09:12:58+00:00): Olá, nomes não devem ser abreviados nem copiados do google
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143553670
Iluminando APP BR (2023-11-22 18:14:01+00:00): Certo. Ajustei a abreviação. Os dados foram obtidos através de caminhada no local. Valeu
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-13 02:26:04+00:00): DWG revert:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143953594
Waaslander (2023-11-03 15:43:57+00:00): Mocht je interesse hebben om op grote schaal imports te doen van GRB gebouwen raad ik je aan om lid te worden van de OSM community. Er bestaat een grote groepschat op Element (software) genaamd OpenStreetMap Belgium. Via die weg kan je ingeleid worden in de werkwijze van GRB import. Het is trouwens ook iets dat ik op grote schaal doe, dus misschien dat ik je daar bij kan helpen. Succes alleszins!
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-13 02:26:05+00:00): DWG revert:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143953594
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-13 02:26:06+00:00): DWG revert:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143953594
Zandu (2023-11-11 00:04:51+00:00): What is invalid about this change? I’d be happy to correct.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143554304
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2026-04-12 18:42:11+00:00): Neměňte prosím ulice u adres, a už vůbec nedávejte stejné ulice u druhých orientačních čísel, jako u těch prvních čísel. Vznikají tím zbytečně duplicitní čísla v ulicích. Tam je to Na padesátém 31-43 (lichá strana ulice).
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-03 06:02:03+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15327
citrula (2023-11-03 05:06:24+00:00): Hi AngryKoconut,

Welcome to OSM! For the path intersections you have made, you should try to keep the intersections simple - think of the footways as representing the route which the paths take, not the physical space they take up. You shouldn't make the "fanning" patterns that you have in some intersections. Happy to explain more if needed! :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143555421
Cambroulet (2023-11-20 05:36:08+00:00): Źle napisałem.
*SĄ usuwane
Matt_ (2023-11-03 03:31:07+00:00): Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_National_Inventory_of_Dams
zstadler (2023-11-03 06:30:38+00:00): Hello frymo,

Thank you for updating the map.

As you probably know, the OSM map in Israel was subject to a vandalism attack. The recovery from. the attack is still on going.

Note that some legitimate edits made during the recovery period will be removed in the process.

See
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vandalism-and-blocks-in-israel/105176
for the latest updates on the recovery
AkuAnakTimur (2023-11-03 03:52:36+00:00): Addendum

From 2021
https://kartaview.org/details/3855405/207/track-info
Udarian (2023-11-04 18:41:28+00:00): why did you add this when there is already turn:lanes=* tagging on way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/968569007 which represents the exact same information. If the turn:lanes=* tagging is wrong I feel it would have been better if that had been fixed instead of adding wholly new geometry. what I'm trying to say is that I dont think this is necessary and am wondering why you did added the link.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143557127
ravapoch (2023-11-09 13:01:42+00:00): Hello Udarian,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and making necessary changes  I made these edits based on the lane markings visible in Bing Imagery. I apologize for adding the incorrect link road, and I want to assure you that I'll take extra care to avoid such mistakes in the future. I appreciate your assistance in rectifying the error. happy to learn from the community.

Best Regards,
ravapoch
jmapb (2024-03-02 02:27:07+00:00): Hi snake21, what's the source for this only_straight_on relation? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16640114
GOwin (2023-11-03 05:34:07+00:00): For features like this, the operator or brand is a helpful information to add.
Metzor (2023-11-04 08:28:51+00:00): Hallo googie!

Du hast auf eine Kreisstraße einen Poller gemapt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11308969547#map=19/48.10976/9.27298&layers=N

Das heißt, dort darf kein Auto mehr durch fahren.

Das halte ich auf einer Kreisstraße für unwahrscheinlich.

War das ein Versehen?

Viele Grüße
Metzor
googie0815 (2023-11-04 18:39:48+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, sollte neben die Straße auf den Gewhweg
Kovoschiz (2023-11-03 11:51:53+00:00): Please don't add brackets. `name=` is proper names only, not a label.
AndyB_66 (2023-11-03 16:21:59+00:00): Czy mógłbyś nadawać swoim zestawom zmian sensowne i niosące jakąś informację, co do ich charakteru, nazwy? Stwierdzenie "poprawki map". które stosujesz do wszystkich swoich edycji, nikomu nic nie mówi, co wniosłeś do społeczności - dostosuj się, proszę, do zasad, obowiązujących na OSM (patrz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian).
MxxCon (2023-11-03 22:56:09+00:00): Hello.
Why are you mapping traffic signals like this? What is this based on?
According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals they should be mapped either at the intersection node or if you are mapping them on each way, they should be placed at the marked _stopping location_.
Could you please explain your mapping?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143559295
deepikja (2023-11-10 19:38:49+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing the edit and notifying us about the improper modifications. These changes were done by the editors in accordance with our internal SOP. We apologize for the incorrect edits flown into OSM from our end. I have investigated the edits and made the appropriate changes in the changeset ID # 143877119.
We will re-examine all of the changesets in which the team has updated traffic signal/stop sign attributes, and rectify them by 11/16. We will also work on updating the SOP to be followed while adding these attributes on public OSM which align with the community guidelines/OSM wiki.
Regards,
Deepika
Minh Nguyen (2023-11-08 07:14:18+00:00): What’s so bad about micromapping? Now the crossing is rather misleading: to a pedestrian, it’s as if there are random curbs in the middle of the road.
tguen (2023-11-09 02:57:27+00:00): What's "wrong" with micromapping depends on what's being mapped. Usually it's harmless, such as trees & fences in residential areas. In regards to highways, it adds unnecessary complexity which makes routing and QC more difficult. In many cases it provides no value, such as this case, splitting a road at an island rather than just using a traffic_calming=island node. One could argue that it's more accurate, but-
A: It really isn't. When a road is split, each side is typically mapped as turning 30-45 degrees to one side for several feet, then straightening out again, then reversing this process where the segments merge again. This does not accurately represent the shape of the road.
B: I could make the same argument about splitting *every* two-way road into to one-ways. No one maps that way because it's more complex and not useful.

Also, each crossing was split into 5 segments: a 2ft footway=sidewalk from the center of the sidewalk to the curb (useless), a footway=crossing from the curb to the island, a footway=sidewalk thru the island (wrong), another crossing to the other curb, then another 2ft sidewalk segment (useless). I have a hard time imagining anyone seeing any value in mapping crossings this way.

The "curbs" on the island are tagged kerb=flush (a meaningless tag that essentially negates barrier=kerb IMO), so the hypothetical router or renderer that recognizes kerb tags should not have a problem with it.
tguen (2023-11-09 02:59:25+00:00): Maybe "bad" wasn't the right word, but it's not good either.
Minh Nguyen (2023-11-09 08:26:03+00:00): I can see how the dual carriageways around the traffic islands looked out of place, but they did adhere to a literal reading of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway and what’s sometimes referred to as the “physical separation principle” – that some physical barrier is what determines whether a road is divided or not. We have no rule against someone now coming in and mapping the traffic island itself, in which case the road would conflict with it.

The five crosswalk segments you’re referring to are a very common mapping practice in U.S. cities these days. This detail is being used by some renderers that focus on street-level detail, and there’s even a tag for the portion within the traffic island, used over 20,000 times: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dtraffic_island

There’s certainly no requirement for you to map in such great detail if you’re mapping a street for the first time, but someone went through the effort to add it and their approach isn’t any further outside the mainstream than yours.
archpdx (2023-11-09 23:16:28+00:00): I originally split some of these islands into dual carriageways as other traffic islands on Foster that were there before the road diet (ie Foster/Cora) were already mapped as dual carriageways. Also, at least to me, it didn't really make sense to have the crossing node in the middle of the refuge island.

As Minh mentioned, mapping refuge islands as dual carriageways is common practice: for example Grand River Ave in Detroit (https://osm.org/#map=19/42.40571/-83.23111) and Chaparral Rd in Scottsdale (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/33.50966/-111.91284).

If you feel strongly about this, I encourage you to discuss this with other mappers on either the forum or Slack to form a consensus on whether these should or shouldn't be mapped as dual carriageways. I want to make sure these are mapped consistently.
eggie (2023-11-03 08:22:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Kleine wijziging: 
correct phone format +31
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
harumiusinc (2023-11-04 16:22:25+00:00): >parking_entranceは、平面の駐車場には使いません.
理解しました。

ただ、削除された駐車場出入口のようにラインで接続されていない場合、出入口の判別が困難になります。出入口の場所が分かるようにタグ付けしていました。
・ライン(highway=service)で接続。
・OSM wikiのamenity=parking_entranceの頁に
>もし妥当ならば、entrance=*を組み合わせて使うことができます。
 とあるように、削除ではなくタグを置き換える(entrance=parkingなど)。
・ノートあるいは、ノードだけでも残す。
…などの変更方法があったはずです。なぜタグ付けされてるのか考えて下さい。変更など検討してから削除した方が良いはずです。

>entranceも、公園には使いません。 
routing:entranceに変更ですね。
Rakkka (2023-11-05 07:09:06+00:00): 　そもそもWikiには、道路と平面の駐車場のウェイを接続するという記述が見当たりません。entrance=parkingというタグもWikiに載っていません。
　平面の駐車場にentranceが使えるのかどうかは、entranceのページを見てもはっきりしませんし、他に使っている例がほとんどありません。

　このため、現時点で平面の駐車場の入り口をノードで示す方法はないというのが私の認識です。
　間違った記述はたくさんあり、いちいちコメントを残すなどしていたら作業量が膨大になります。なのですぐに削除しています。
　今回のように異論があれば調べ直し、間違っていたら謝罪して元に戻します。

　道路のウェイを駐車場内まで伸ばせば、どこが入り口かは見てわかると思いますがいかがでしょうか。
harumiusinc (2023-11-05 16:09:42+00:00): >そもそもWikiには、道路と平面の駐車場のウェイを接続するという記述が見当たりません。
　entranceキーに準じて接続する方向で考えていたからです。接続してはいけないという記述を見かけた覚えもなく。
　基本的に平面の地物である『公園』のwiki頁で「"barrierで囲まれている場合、出入口barrier=gateかentrance=*でタグ付けすることが重要」と記述があったので、応用できるかと思い。
amenity=parking_entranceの頁に「もし妥当ならば、entrance=*を組み合わせて使うことができます 」という記述があり。
...そういった所から接続した方がいいんじゃないか。ってのが私の認識す。

>entrance=parkingというタグもWikiに載っていません。
>平面の駐車場にentranceが使えるのかどうかは、entranceのページを見てもはっきりしませんし、他に使っている例がほとんどありません。
　ええと、文章化・推奨化されてないだけで、wikiの幾つかのページに「OSMでは、ノード、ウェイ、エリアに割り当てるタグの内容に制限を設けていません。好きなタグを何でも使うことができます」等といった趣旨の記述がありまして、wikiはその指針とか概ね決定したルールみたいなもので、完全に承認済や却下されていなければ正誤は無いのではかと...。前例がないと言う人は何年たっても前例がないと言うような。
amenity=parking_entranceのタグ付けは間違っていたので、前述したentranceキーへの置換を考えてtag infoを見ると「entrance=parking」ってのが千件ほど使われてたので、代替手段の1つとして提案しました。でも、今考えると=parkingにする意味は薄いからやめた方が良さそうですね。

>道路のウェイを駐車場内まで伸ばせば、どこが入り口かは見てわかると思いますがいかがでしょうか。
　あ、はい。"ライン(highway=service)で接続"のしない版ってことですね。それが今の所ベストかも？（正直、駐車場周りは不完全に感じる点があるので、悩ましい。）

>間違った記述はたくさんあり、いちいちコメントを残すなどしていたら作業量が膨大になります。
　わかる。
>なのですぐに削除しています。
　こまる。
　OSMというかwikiの全体を通して、例えば『グッドプラクティス』の頁などにも書いてありますが「自分が意味を理解できないタグを削除しない」、「削除されたデータを見つけたり復元したりすることは、追加されたデータを調整するよりも難しいため、データを削除するときは注意してください」。個人的に一番言いたかった・気を付けて欲しいなと思った点です。履歴を見て即削除してる風だったのが気になったので、ガンガン消されると困るから気を付けてもらえないかな...って感じでした。

>今回のように異論があれば調べ直し、間違っていたら謝罪して元に戻します。 
　謝罪というかむしろamenity=parking_entranceとか誤用に気付かせてもらって有難いです。
消したノードは放置で大丈夫です（自分で付けたタグの修整と更新しないとなぁと思っているので）。
Rakkka (2023-11-06 02:29:32+00:00): Wikiを改めて読んだところ、
JA:グッドプラクティス
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E3%82%B0%E3%83%83%E3%83%89%E3%83%97%E3%83%A9%E3%82%AF%E3%83%86%E3%82%A3%E3%82%B9

> 自分が意味を理解できないタグを削除しない
とあるのを把握していませんでした。今後は明らかな誤りではなく何かの意図がありそうなものは一考します。

また
> どうしても良いタグが見つからなかったら、 note=* や description=* に説明文を記入しましょう。 
とあるため、新しいタグを追加するのであれば、そのようにした方がトラブルを減らせると思います。

あと、親しくないID同士のやり取りなのに匿名掲示板のような言い回しを使われると、返信する気が失せてしまいます。ご遠慮いただければ幸いです。
harumiusinc (2023-11-06 13:03:23+00:00): >今後は明らかな誤りではなく何かの意図がありそうなものは一考します。
　お願いします。言葉を借りて言うと「削除することで、他の作業量が増える」って視点もありますので。タグ定義済のマッピングする人もいればタグ未整備地物↓のマッピングをやってる人もいるのでお互いに。

> どうしても良いタグが見つからなかったら、 note=* や description=* に説明文を記入しましょう。
>とあるため、新しいタグを追加するのであれば、そのようにした方がトラブルを減らせると思います。
　新しいタグなど追加する場合はそうですね。ただ、そもそも、今回の争点になったamenity=parking_entrance自体は間違いでしたし、その代替案としてのentranceタグもwikiに準じての提案でし
た。私自身、最初のコメントの「ノートあるいは、ノードだけでも残す」という提案はしていることから、その概念については理解しております。
（先のコメントの「道路のウェイを駐車場内まで伸ばせば、どこが入り口かは見てわかると思いますがいかがでしょうか。」という件やwikiについての言い回しと併せて、あたかも自分の発案のように言われると、読解力が低いのか他人を低く見ていそうといった印象を受け返信する気が失せてしまう方もいるのではないかと思いましたので、ご注意いただければ幸いです。 自分の言い回しの件↓と併せてです。）

>あと、親しくないID同士のやり取りなのに匿名掲示板のような言い回しを使われると、返信する気が失せてしまいます。
　承知いたしました。了解です。また何かやらかしておりましたらよろしくお願い致します。
Marc_ch (2023-11-03 08:52:18+00:00): Bonjour,
merci pour votre contribution.
il faut cependannt connecter la place aux rues voisines pour que celle-ci soie routable (par ex quand une application piéton, il est pour le moment impossible de joindre la place). selon la configuration de la place, il faudra ajouter éventuelement des barrières, des plots ou autres obstacle physique anti-voiiture s'il y en a)
Salutations,
Marc
user_5359 (2023-11-04 06:51:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys). Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org!
citrula (2023-11-14 16:37:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have corrected some of the tags on your business to conform with OSM standards. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143560365
nevw (2023-11-04 10:36:15+00:00): I added a primary tag to your business edit so that osm can process what kind of thing you have added and render it on the map. You might like to change it to a more specific tag.
nevw (2023-11-04 10:33:30+00:00): I added shop=tattoo to you business edit so that osm can process what you have offered and render it on the map.
Kovoschiz (2023-11-03 07:51:30+00:00): Please don't add `=fence` to a `=multipolygon` . It is strictly an area. Add it to the perimeters directly.
user_5359 (2023-11-04 06:54:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys). Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-03 08:10:25+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/605730491

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
lefuturiste (2023-11-03 15:47:30+00:00): Quel est l'intention de ces modifications ?
OpenLoire (2023-11-03 19:01:56+00:00): Bonjour, l'intention est de cartographier, je ne comprends pas bien la question ? est ce qu'il y a une erreur ?
Filip009 (2023-11-03 11:39:57+00:00): Dobrý deň, keď pridáte značku obce, môžete v tom mieste cestu aj rozdeliť a na jednu stranu dať tag maxspeed=50 source=SK:urban a na druhú stranu maxpeed=90 a source=SK:rural. Pokiaľ nie je dopravnou značkou explicitne uvedené inak.
Filip009 (2023-11-04 07:59:35+00:00): Pardon, tie source som ti zle napísal je to source:maxspeed=* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source:maxspeed

Slúži to hlavne na to, že keď sa náhodou zmení maximálna povolená rýchlosť v meste alebo mimo, tak sa vyberú všetky cesty s týmto tagom a zmení sa im rýchlosť na novú.
Jose Luis Infante (2023-11-04 18:18:23+00:00): Hola,
gracias por tu edición. Sería imprescindible clasificar el punto que has creado como un trastero. Se puede añadir la etiqueta shop=storage_rental. Sería interesante añadir más información, como los datos de contacto, etc.
Un saludo!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143562516
creatuweb (2023-11-05 00:43:05+00:00): la verdad es que desconozco por completo como funciona este sistema de mapeado, pero si fuese tan amable de indicarme si tienen algun video tutorial, rapido aprenderia y podria seguir aportando mas contenido :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143562516
jeslop (2023-11-30 16:45:03+00:00): Hola creatuweb, te paso un par de enlaces:
https://learnosm.org/es/beginner/start-osm/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIWJmHsbmNI&list=PLE-WWAxY_S5gedFZuUudRxryvz0f3_lmi&index=2&pp=iAQB

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_00vAPjSkw

Saludos
dypa (2023-11-03 14:27:24+00:00): у точки https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1570463140 пропал/не хватает  Регулируемый пешеходный переход :(
Константин Гам (2023-11-03 15:21:53+00:00): Да вроде всё на месте о0
Langlaeufer (2023-11-04 12:15:48+00:00): Hallo aburo,

Ist Radfahren auf dem Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/143863274 wirklich verboten?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143563122
aburo (2023-11-05 09:34:12+00:00): Danke für Deinen Kommentar. Ich nehme die Restriction für Bicycles wieder raus. Wenn Du genau reinzoomst gibt es 2m nördlich einen Fahrrad/Fußweg und südlich den Horse trail. 
Verboten ist es natürlich nicht im schweren Sand des Horseweges mit einem Fahrrad zu fahren. LG
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143563122
arjunaraoc (2023-12-07 12:23:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Please upload in chunks covering smaller areas.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143563233
collect (2023-11-03 09:35:25+00:00): 请问这里的石化厂为什么道路画这么密？