piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
emersonveenstra (2023-10-23 11:55:56+00:00): Hi,

Please stop doing things just to "fix" validator warnings, if you aren't sure what you're doing you're only going to make the map worse. You should never add negative layers to bodies of water like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/572188561 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/572188562
WMA_Travel (2023-10-26 01:10:28+00:00): Sorry.  I read the wiki too quickly before.  Now I re-read it completely to make sure I understand it.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer#:~:text=The%20layer%20%3D*%20tag%20is,ways%20cross%20or%20objects%20overlap.
kuhni74 (2024-10-18 20:10:04+00:00): ein warehouse ist was ganz anderes, ich tippe hier auf building=shed
globosound (2024-10-22 08:58:57+00:00): danke für die info, in street-complete heißt das einfach "Lagerhaus-Gebäude" ohne nähere erklärung. werde es neu taggen
MxxCon (2023-10-22 18:51:56+00:00): Hello.
When you  are mapping building you supposed to map the actual shape of the building.
In OSM we do not map plots of lands/property lines.
This edit and other similar ones were reverted in full.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142973454
Metzor (2023-10-23 06:02:50+00:00): Hi Michael!

Sei doch bitte so nett und halte deine Änderungssätze geografisch etwas kleiner, insbesondere bei so einer unspezifischen Beschreibung. Du kennst es vermutlich, aber zur Erinnerung s.u.

Danke und viele Grüße
Metzor

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
MichaelFS (2023-10-24 07:57:13+00:00): Hallo, danke für den Hinweis, werde ich künftig berücksichtigen. Hier wollte ich  - im Rahmen meines Zeitbudgets -  einige OSMOSE-Fehler beheben: Ich hatte parking*, z.B. diagonal berichtigt aber paring=no gesetzt. Das wollte ich schnell berichtigen ...
Bitte um Nachsicht!
Metzor (2023-10-24 09:09:08+00:00): Hi Michael,

Danke und kein Thema.
Ich kenn Josm nicht gut, habe aber mal gehört, dass man mehrere gemachte Änderungen auch seperat hochladen kann:
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Action/UploadSelection

Keine Ahnung, ob das praktikabel ist :-)

Schöne Grüße
Metzor
MichaelFS (2023-11-01 16:44:36+00:00): Danke Metzor, endlich hatte ich Zeit, Deinen Tipp zu testen: Funkioniert perfekt!
Wieder etwas gelernt, vielen Dank!
Gruß, Michael
silversurfer83 (2023-10-22 15:40:55+00:00): Hi

slow down :)
you might wish to use more than one background image and please watch out: this building looks rectangular to me, you might wish to correct that
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142973844
SomeoneElse (2023-10-26 22:20:35+00:00): For info, I've filled in a gap in the Suffolk Coast Path 1140775 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143184043
AR_Mapper (2023-11-05 07:36:17+00:00): Thanks! I thought I'd fixed them all but it was my first time working with this type of relation.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-22 16:10:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1217570553

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mavl (2024-11-13 08:50:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159081298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
silversurfer83 (2023-11-28 21:11:31+00:00): Gude,

warum löscht du denn den Club wieder? So ist es nur eine Adresse mit Namen. Das ist doch ungünstig.

Zu den Treffen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

Grüße
silversurfer83
MarcoR (2023-10-24 14:20:45+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM!

Ho controllato la tua modifica e mi sembra che l'escape room sia stata mappata correttamente.

Buon mapping,
Marco.
SomeoneElse (2023-10-22 16:58:28+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!
Could you explain in a bit more detail why you've made this change?
ivanbranco (2023-10-22 17:55:47+00:00): Restoring Scaglione's edits: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/9887523575

I wonder who this is :0
user_20494801 (2023-10-22 20:51:40+00:00): Yes, it is in fact me.

With this changeset I initially just wanted to restore the original situation of the Garbagnate Milanese places. The node I deleted multiple times was created by me, as can be seen in the link shared by @ivanbranco.
I wanted to restore the situation previous to my idea of creating a distinction between the municipality and the historic center.

All the other changes are:
The re-adding of the new supermarket Banco Fresco in Garbagnate Milanese
The re-adding of data relating to the new position of the Carabinieri station in Arese
Adding of official quarters of Saronno found at this webpage http://www.prolocosaronno.it/index.php/quartieri-di-saronno/
The improvement of various already existing places: Barbaiana, Lainate, Torretta, Bollate, Cascina del Sole, Pinzano, Mombello, San Francesco, Villaggio dei Giovi, Villaggio dei Fiori, Villaggio del Sole, Villaggio Brollo, Chalet del Laghetto, Sant'Anna, Solaro, Cascina Emanuela, Cascina Colombara, Introini, Cascinazza, Campo dei Fiori, Rovellasca
Some improvements around the Esselunga supermarkets of Garbagnate Milanese and Lainate
Adding of buildings in Dal Pozzo
Adding of new place "Villaggio Brollo di Ceriano Laghetto" representing the area of Villaggio Brollo located inside Ceriano Laghetto instead of Solaro

I made this changeset solely because of the problem I mentioned in the beginning, and all the rest was me being carried away with doing other improvements.

I hope we can reach an understanding about the matter.
ivanbranco (2023-10-22 21:11:21+00:00): Why keep creating sockpuppers, as "pavia123"?
Can't you get in touch with DWG, promise to act in good faith and start using only one account?
ivanbranco (2023-10-26 09:49:23+00:00): My last message is from 4 days ago, your last activity (with this account) is from 20 hours ago. No reply, meanwhile you kept creating and using sockpuppets, I guess acting in good faith is not something you are interested in.
Maximus_Severus (2023-10-22 16:38:21+00:00): Comment: Building of tyre repair center had been demolished. Business moved to the another location
Filip009 (2023-10-24 14:13:05+00:00): Ahoj, do name tagu nepatrí odkiaľ kam trasa smeruje. Prosím prehoď to do description.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-23 07:00:26+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143001879
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-26 19:36:23+00:00): When you put "tin" did you mean "steel?"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142976436
Marcos Dione (2026-01-26 14:21:30+00:00): Bonjour. Dans ce changement vous avez supprimé https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10604267452 que j'avais ajouté un an avant. Pouvez vous me dire la raison? C'est un sentier sans issue que j'ai ajouté lors d'une randonnée.
Marcos Dione (2026-01-26 22:40:41+00:00): Pardon, j'ai voulu dire ce sentier là: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137614641
M GM (2026-01-27 09:15:30+00:00): Bonjour, il s'agit visiblement d'une sente informelle, sans issue, qui ne figure sur aucune cartographie que ce soit les cartes historiques, celle du parc national où de l'IGN. Je pense qu'on ne peut pas ajouter tous les embryons de chemins, surtout dans le massif des Calanques qui est très emprunté et sujet à de nombreuses digressions de la part des randonneurs. Cela rendrait la cartographie illisible
Marcos Dione (2026-01-27 18:52:07+00:00): hmmm, ok. De toute façon je suis pas sur si c'était sans issue, j'ai seulement ne pas continu à l'emprunter.

Mais t'as raison de ne pas ajouter des sentiers ne pas cartographiés par le PN, je n'avais pas pensé à ça. Je le resupprime.

Par contre, où peut-on regarder la carte officiel du PN? Par exemple celui pour les vélos du site es un peu moche:

https://www.calanques-parcnational.fr/sites/calanques-parcnational.fr/files/styles/extra_large/public/2023-07/Carte%20v%C3%A9lo.PNG
M GM (2026-01-28 11:14:29+00:00): Après il ne faut pas se contenter de la carto officielle qui fait exprès d'omettre des chemins, mais il faut aussi faire un tri dans toutes les sentes ;)
Pour les carto du PNC voir : https://cartotheque.calanques-parcnational.fr/
qui présente des liens vers des cartes numériques thématiques (dont la pratique du vélo)
silversurfer83 (2023-11-28 21:05:39+00:00): Moin Tobi,

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht. Ist zwar schon ein paar Tage her, ich geb trotzdem mal mein Feedback:

Sieht prinzipiell ok aus. An einer Stelle hab ich kurz Hand angelegt: Du hast den Weg mit dem Waldumriss verbunden. Das ist nicht so gut, darum hab ich das wieder getrennt.
Also in Zukunft einfach darauf achten, dass du nur Objekte miteinander verbindest, die das an der Stelle auch benötigen.

Ansonsten können Wege grundsätzlich noch mehr Eigenschaften wie Oberfläche, Ebenheit, Breite, Steigung,... vertragen, falls diese Informationen erkennbar sind:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath
klick dich da mal durch.
In Wäldern darauf achten, dass die meisten Waldgesetze der Länder keine Fahrräder abseits korrekt angelegter Wege erlaubt (also nicht auf Trampelpfaden oder illegalen MTB Trails).

Grüße
silversurfer83
gscholz (2023-11-26 08:04:42+00:00): Hi patodiez,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of "Urbanizacion Pueblo Atocha":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-65.47181&lat=-24.81754&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=142977040

I have just fixed this here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144462553

May be you like to watch out for this kind of errors if you touch boundary relations.

Kind regards
Guido
eggie (2023-10-23 16:36:55+00:00): Hoi Benne... Lijkt me oke zo.
Bij een zebra wordt dan getagd de hoofdrag crossing_ref=zebra
Die andere tags zijn er weer voor hoe die zebra eruit ziet.
Regenboogzebra's  soort strepen.
Het gaat allemaal een beetje  ver. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing_ref%3Dzebra
en
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:markings


MVG
eggie
KasperSFranz (2023-10-22 17:55:29+00:00): JSOM froze up - this was adding postcodes to buildings around Cortis Road :)
Alexey Vazhnov (2024-02-24 23:58:42+00:00): Hi!
I've reverted your change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147874537 , because you've already added the shop in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142978888
kwiatek_123 (2023-10-22 18:50:47+00:00): Usunąłem ten punkt gdyż zawierał samą nazwę. Nie zawierał innych poprawnych tagów, które opisywałyby czego ta nazwa dotyczy.
moje_konto (2023-10-24 01:40:54+00:00): Czasem same nazwy są wskazówką i można traktować je jak notki, po ustaleniu o co chodzi można dodać poprawne znaczniki.

Ale nie wszystkie są jasne i wtedy się je zamyka bez edycji, albo w przypadku węzła usuwa.

www.openstreetmap.org/node/4452002259
Tutaj przede wszystkim był to duplikat, więc na pewno jeden był do usunięcia.

Ten drugi niestety też nie jest kompletny, ma tylko adres, nie wpisano czego ta nazwa konkretnie dotyczy.

Może pod tym adresem jest biuro operatora tych mieszkań, może miała być to nazwa całego osiedla? Jeśli było już sprawdzone, to warto sprecyzować. Inni żeby poprawić musieliby dopiero spróbować ustalić jaki znacznik dodać.

Warto zajrzeć na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org - są tam przydatne informacje o znacznikach dla różnych obiektów.
joost schouppe (2023-10-23 09:46:23+00:00): Indeed, I can confirm: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.762357174824274&lng=4.452009131944919&z=14.422581093963533&pKey=329591135801544&focus=photo&x=0.09916410570407491&y=0.5870077646331738&zoom=2.153526970954357
moje_konto (2023-10-22 22:19:24+00:00): www.openstreetmap.org/way/1211644068

type=multipolygon jest tu niepoprawne, ręcznie wklejony znacznik od relacji, a to jest zwykła linia/obszar bez relacji.

Przy tym dla obszaru wystarczy samo:
area:highway=service

Dodatkowe highway=service powinno być na samej linii drogi, na obszarze jest pod render, co jest niezalecane.
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-26 17:55:18+00:00): Fixed of the Woodscape Apartments a bit.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142980233
Supaplex (2023-10-24 04:53:55+00:00): 'Hi Massive remove name:ru is not OK. Those are someone'"'"'s hard work, not workload that should be removed 

Dennis Raylin Chen 
Data Working Group 
data@osmfoundation.org'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143046327
ovruni (2023-10-22 20:01:53+00:00): Hola, le habia escrito anteriormente sobre los nombres descriptivos pero igual los ha vuelto a colocar, ademas se han colocado hashtag en las etiquetas, por lo que he revertido sus conjuntos de cambios.
Saludos
Supaplex (2023-10-24 04:51:47+00:00): 'Hi Massive remove name:ru is not OK. Those are someone'"'"'s hard work, not workload that should be removed 

Dennis Raylin Chen 
Data Working Group 
data@osmfoundation.org'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143046290
Supaplex (2023-10-24 04:51:48+00:00): 'Hi Massive remove name:ru is not OK. Those are someone'"'"'s hard work, not workload that should be removed 

Dennis Raylin Chen 
Data Working Group 
data@osmfoundation.org'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143046290
Supaplex (2023-10-24 04:49:36+00:00): 'Hi Massive remove name:ru is not OK. Those are someone'"'"'s hard work, not workload that should be removed 

Dennis Raylin Chen 
Data Working Group 
data@osmfoundation.org'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143046260
Supaplex (2023-10-24 04:48:47+00:00): 'Hi Massive remove name:ru is not OK. Those are someone'"'"'s hard work, not workload that should be removed 

Dennis Raylin Chen 
Data Working Group 
data@osmfoundation.org'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143046252
Supaplex (2023-10-24 04:48:07+00:00): 'Hi Massive remove name:ru is not OK. Those are someone'"'"'s hard work, not workload that should be removed 

Dennis Raylin Chen 
Data Working Group 
data@osmfoundation.org'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143046244
Supaplex (2023-10-24 04:47:16+00:00): 'Hi Massive remove name:ru is not OK. Those are someone'"'"'s hard work, not workload that should be removed 

Dennis Raylin Chen 
Data Working Group 
data@osmfoundation.org'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143046230
Supaplex (2023-10-24 04:46:06+00:00): 'Hi Massive remove name:ru is not OK. Those are someone'"'"'s hard work, not workload that should be removed 

Dennis Raylin Chen 
Data Working Group 
data@osmfoundation.org'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143046222
Supaplex (2023-10-24 04:45:16+00:00): 'Hi Massive remove name:ru is not OK. Those are someone'"'"'s hard work, not workload that should be removed 

Dennis Raylin Chen 
Data Working Group 
data@osmfoundation.org'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143046206
zorglubu (2023-10-28 17:46:08+00:00): Bonjour,
Je vous prie d'indiquer également très rapidement quelle est la source vous ayant amené à ajouter cette éolienne. Il me semble que toutes vos dernières contributions sont du vandalisme, mais il se peut que je me trompe, pouvez-vous me dire ce qu'il en est ?
Merci.
Myazyk (2023-10-22 21:40:31+00:00): Там точно ота церква на два поверхи?
Привіт
Shyshka (2023-10-23 21:03:09+00:00): Привіт.  Я хотів вказати, що вона на другому поверсі будинку. Ніби так у них вказано на сторінці
Myazyk (2023-10-24 09:50:50+00:00): Зараз все ок вказано
mapperue (2024-01-02 13:33:29+00:00): Do názvu sa nevpisuje spojenie pamätná tabuľa. To je jasné z tagu.
mapperue (2024-01-03 06:48:14+00:00): Do otváracích hodín sa nevpisujú slovenské názvy ako "zatvorené". Na to slúži úplne iný formát. Ak si nie ste istý, čo tam patrí, tak tam nevpisujte nič.
Dodko (2024-01-03 10:01:37+00:00): Na zatvorené sa môže použiť
opening_hours=off
ڕاستی (2023-10-22 20:03:52+00:00): https://www.facebook.com/basnews/videos/1371505413441194/

سەرچاوەی دەستکاری ناوەکان.
K2-SO (2023-10-22 19:27:18+00:00): sowie eine Sitzbank erfasst (Position nur geschätzt)
eggie (2023-10-24 12:38:14+00:00): Hoi  Kennelijk ziet de BAG het anders..
Je kunt dan beter het zichtbare deel als building intekeken en het ondergrondse ? deel als building:part
Of is er geen groot gebouw.
Fouten kun je doorgeven aan het kadster.

Nu zie je niets meer, want het zijn geen gesloten polygonen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-10-24 12:38:21+00:00): De BAG https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=gaffelstraat+58b&objectId=0599100000627322&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=91755.02&geometry.y=436867.805&zoomlevel=14.74304773681767&bijbehorendeAdressen=Pand
eggie (2023-10-24 12:42:55+00:00): Zaken die niet kloppen kun je bij het Kadaster melden. Zie link boven.
Valentijn (2023-10-24 13:04:11+00:00): Hmm. Ik denk dat het Kadaster wel klopt. De woningen zijn blijkbaar mét de onderliggende buurt-parkeergarage als één gebouw aangegeven in het Kadaster. Dat is absoluut niet wat je op straatniveau waarneemt of wat de feitelijke gebruikssituatie is. Die is namelijk: een buurtparkeergarage met als ingang Nieuwe Binnenweg 99F; en een rij huizen die gewoon doorlopen zoals de overige huizen in de Bloemkwekersstraat en de Gaffelstraat.

Dat mijn wijzigingenset niet klopt (d.i. dat de relaties stuk zijn) daar was ik me van bewust, maar het lukte me niet om de relaties correct te krijgen.

Wat nu? Terugdraaien van de wijzigingenset?
eggie (2023-10-24 13:15:45+00:00): Aahh. Ik draai het wel terug.
Dan kun je het best dat grote vlak taggen als building:part=....
En dan teken je het linker en rechter deel gewoon in als building=....
Succes..
eggie
Ik draai het wel even teug.
Als je er niet uitkomt dan kijk ik vanmiddag wel even.
Je kunt ook de bgt omtrekgericht als achtergrond gebruiken.
Dan zie je de gebouwomtrek.
eggie (2023-10-24 13:17:30+00:00): reverted by Wijzigingenset #143064911
eggie (2023-10-24 13:19:47+00:00): Die woningen aan de Gaffel- en Bloemkwekerstraat kun je gwoon als twee aparte delen intekeken op het grote vlak.
Het grote vlak wordt dan building:part 
en zal dan niet meer renderen.

Je kunt het dan als ondergrondse parking taggen.
eggie (2023-10-24 13:21:26+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dunderground
eggie (2023-10-24 15:01:10+00:00): Aangepast zoals bovenstaand
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-10-24 15:05:08+00:00): Wanneer de parking openbaar is kan er evt nog een naam op.
Wanneer het priveparkeeren is dan access=private.. ook op de ingang van de parking. 
CTRL f5 voor het effect.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-24 03:21:12+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143044931
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-24 03:26:37+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15249
streckenkundler (2023-10-22 20:09:20+00:00): ...also bei diesen deinigen Angaben musste ich erst mal 2-3mal nachdenken, was gemeint ist...

...und ja... logisch... :)

Vielen Dank und weiter so...

Sven
Ropino (2023-10-22 20:33:58+00:00): Hi,
ich habe dort gerade noch die motorway-symbole ergänzt. ;)
btw:
Das mit dem "zur Bxx" ist vielleicht nicht die optimale Lösung,"zur" ist ja eigentlich kein Ort, aber auf den Vorwegweisern steht es halt ab und zu so drauf. 
Man kann auch mal einen Blick hierher werfen:
http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/destinationsign/example/index.htm#zoom=18&lat=51.94173&lon=13.893622
--> nicht zu 100% fehlerfrei, aber für mich sehr gut gemachte Darstellung.
VG
canfe (2025-03-10 08:05:41+00:00): L'incrocio tra Vela e Bricherasio non ha il marciapiede "ad ottagono".
L'ho ridotto a dove effettivamente c'è.
ivanbranco (2025-03-10 10:56:43+00:00): Ora però ci sono dei tratti di marciapiede scollegati dal grafo stradale, perché non unirli con highway=footway+footway=crossing?
canfe (2025-03-14 10:21:43+00:00): Fatto ma sarebbe tutta Torino da correggere!
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-26 17:50:17+00:00): You were looking for shop=cannabis on Goodies.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142984757
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-29 06:44:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11282099664/history = there should be space (" ") between "Marco's" and "Pizza", right?

If not - please let me know as I added it
user_3022894 (2024-01-22 19:22:35+00:00): Hi Olaf,

Blumen sehe ich hier ehrlich gesagt keine. Ich würde daher vorschlagen, nur natural=scrub zu taggen.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
Bloodmage (2023-10-22 20:44:08+00:00): reverting mass vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142986276
Bloodmage (2023-10-22 20:44:09+00:00): reverting mass vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142986276
spam46200 (2025-09-03 17:27:29+00:00): Rozdzieliłem tagi ref słupów trakcyjnych na których są latarnie uliczne na ref i lamp_ref (np. lamp_ref=I/23 ref=KB-03-54)
mcconner22 (2023-10-22 20:22:44+00:00): Some of the driveways were incorrectly classified as service roads/"standard" roads. And since about 2/3 of the driveways were there, I went ahead and added the rest for consistency.
TrickyFoxy (2023-10-22 20:36:32+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142986072
TrickyFoxy (2023-10-22 20:36:33+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142986072
Emilius123 (2024-04-28 17:24:28+00:00): Mr. Worldwide
KasperSFranz (2023-10-22 20:32:43+00:00): My fingers slipped while creating this.
The title should have been "updated fhrs:id in Roehampton.
Source https://ratings.food.gov.uk/.
Using the JSOM plugin for FHRS data
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-10-22 21:01:32+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 142935219, 142935233, 142935243, 142935254, 142935262, 142935382, 142935386, 142935388, 142935392, 142935398, 142935403, 142935407, 142935412.
Filip009 (2023-10-27 20:10:54+00:00): Please use more approriate changeset comments https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Prosím požívaj lepšie komentáre k tvojim sadám zmien https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn
TRRro - ISRAEL (2023-10-22 20:55:38+00:00): go fuck yourself!
TRRro - ISRAEL (2023-10-22 20:55:51+00:00): go fuck yourself!

ПNДОР!
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-24 02:01:57+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143043658
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-24 02:01:54+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143043655
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-24 02:01:50+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143043653
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-24 02:01:47+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143043650
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-24 02:01:43+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143043648
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-24 02:01:39+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143043645
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-24 02:01:35+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143043642
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-24 02:01:31+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143043640
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-24 02:01:28+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143043638
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-24 02:01:24+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143043636
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-24 02:01:21+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143043634
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-24 02:01:17+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143043630