piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_2562466 (2024-06-04 09:26:34+00:00): agricultural - danke
mueschel (2024-06-04 18:00:45+00:00): Hi,
it's not common to add arbitrary strings (here: bicycle_tube) to keys.
The charge key can take multiple values for different use cases / items:

charge= 1 EUR/bicycle_tube; 2 EUR/brake_pad
Pieter Vander Vennet (2024-06-05 13:14:00+00:00): Hmm, right, that is indeed a better scheme...
Pieter Vander Vennet (2024-06-05 14:14:10+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152289112
literan (2024-10-09 12:15:29+00:00): и зачем вы статусы основных дорог по всему Арзамасу понизили?

откачу. Читайте правила:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification#%D0%9A%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%84%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3_%D0%B2%D0%BD%D1%83%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B8_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D1%85_%D0%BF%D1%83%D0%BD%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2
pitfire (2024-06-04 04:18:54+00:00): Hallo JipJap5,
bitte keine Autobahnauffahrten, highway	motorway_link "way 29238602 oder highway	primary way 332741254 way 237595194 mit cycleway:left=separate
cycleway:right=no auszustatten!
Betrifft auch den way 161884124  mit der Änderung von cycleway:left=no/	
cycleway:right	separate nach cycleway:both=separate.
VG pitfire
Frans S (2024-06-04 09:18:50+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Here you added some traces in a rural area without tagging them.
These tracks are not necessary to be tagged since it are just wheel traces in wood area.
Best regards
woodpeck (2024-06-05 18:30:02+00:00): Can you explain why you upgraded https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1181411487/ - a dead-end, unpaved road leading up into the mountains - from "track" to "tertiary"?
fititnt (2024-06-28 18:56:58+00:00): Olá Constanza Petrazzini

Você adicionou highway=service não apenas na vias , mas também em nodes nesse changeset.

Os nodes de via parecem já ter sido removidos pelo pessoal do #hotosm-project-16863, porém não foi de https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10169000577/history .

Eu cheguei a solicitar em https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/urgente-necessidade-de-reversao-edicoes-delecoes-sem-discussao-em-dados-do-projeto-gps-rural-em-estrela-rs/114994/5 revisão, porém pelo jeito eu mesmo vou resolver esse ponto aqui.
onovy (2024-06-03 19:13:24+00:00): podle RUIAN je tento adresní bod bez ulice:

https://vdp.cuzk.cz/vdp/ruian/adresnimista/84258446
Mathias_ADAV (2024-06-18 13:11:13+00:00): Bonjour, savez-vous si c'est une piste cyclable (séparé de la chaussée ) ou une bande cyclable (cycleway = lane) tracé sur la chaussée ? Merci !
balint36 (2024-06-09 16:21:25+00:00): Szia!
A Balzsam utca - Tesco szervízúton (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1289181503) milyen építkezés zajlik?
Ma voltam ott, de nem láttam semmit.
vasony (2024-06-09 16:25:39+00:00): Semmilyen, rossz szögből volt a fotó és benéztem. Azóta ellenőriznitem és visszavontam ezt a changesetet, de ezek szerint ez nem volt tökéletes. Javítom.
vasony (2024-06-09 16:27:33+00:00): Megvan, egymáson volt a 2 út, a visszavont meg a construction.
kagebar (2024-06-04 10:16:05+00:00): Вітаю! Зверніть увагу, що тег name призначений лише для власних назв, тому не іменуйте лісові стежки "лісова стежка", чи наприклад "стежка до озера".
maro21 (2024-07-02 18:24:06+00:00): Do oznaczenia sklepu w budowie używamy prefiksu "construction:". Np. construction:shop=ticket.
Nie używamy shop=construction, bo to byłby sklep sprzedający konstrukcje.
Anas masuris (2024-07-02 21:27:19+00:00): Faktycznie, już poprawiłem
VA00 (2025-07-27 11:35:16+00:00): Czy ta ścieżka ma obecnie w ogóle sens? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1289176860
englu (2025-08-13 13:35:23+00:00): Nie ma jej w terenie? Jeśli nie ma, to można usunąć.
VA00 (2025-08-13 14:10:00+00:00): Raczej chodziło mi o to, czy w sytuacji wybudowania nowych równoległych dróg ktokolwiek będzie z nich korzystał/utrzymywał? Jeżeli  są to wydeptane w trawie dukty, to sam zapewne wolałbym asfalt, ale nie znam okolicy.
VA00 (2025-08-13 14:10:14+00:00): Np: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1289176861
englu (2025-08-14 07:21:46+00:00): OSM ma odzwierciedlać stan w terenie, więc trzeba by sprawdzić jak to wygląda. Jeśli z jakichś względów ludzie będą wybierać tę ścieżkę i będzie ona wydeptana w terenie, to w OSM powinna być. Mi teraz też daleko do tych okolic, więc nie mogę sprawdzić jak jest obecnie. Pozdrawiam.
literan (2024-06-03 20:13:32+00:00): то парковки street-side, а не surface

исправлю
soundchaser (2024-06-04 07:53:01+00:00): Благодарю, ступил после дворовых.
VLD278 (2024-06-21 18:04:52+00:00): Hello,
I am reaching out about node 11954324892. Can you tell me more about this node and why it was added to the map? "Amenity=fixme” and "fixme:type=gambling” aren’t common tags and usually illegal activities are not added to the map. I would appreciate any clarification, thank you. 
VLD278
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-03 22:44:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152219521 where the changeset comment is: revert gaza edits by throwaway user account circumcenting a user block
Arlo James Barnes (2025-09-06 18:19:46+00:00): disregard previous comment
Tomas Straupis (2024-06-04 06:27:27+00:00): Labas. Bet čia gi nėra realios istorinės rampartos? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1289190931/ Kaip ir bokštų ten jokių nėra... Ten gi šaudykla ir tiek.
MindaugasS (2024-06-04 12:05:51+00:00): Labas, Tomai. Tai yra iš žemių supilti pylimai, kurių amžiaus, tiesą sakant, nežinau. Aplinkui miškuose yra pilna II pasaulinio karo artefaktų (tokių milžiniškų 6–8 metrų pločio apkasų ir pan.); šiuolaikinėje šaudykloje logiškiau būtų tikėtis iš plytų sumūrytos sienos, o žemių pylimai buvo labiau Pilsudskio laikų stilius (vienas toks yra Bukčiuose). Vis dėlto, kad nekiltų diskusijų, ištryniau. A taip a taip, regis, kad tinkamo tago jiems pažymėti nėra.
Tomas Straupis (2024-06-04 12:18:28+00:00): Ačiū. Bėda su jais ta, kad staiga istorinių objektų sąrašas pasipildo objektais, kurie nėra istoriniai :-) Kaip ir bokštai.
km2bp (2024-06-05 18:41:29+00:00): There is probably a ruin of a mill there 
https://pl.mapy.cz/zakladni?source=coor&id=15.178127777777776%2C52.47210277777778&sourcep=foto&idp=7788562&x=15.1780983&y=52.4720456&z=19&ovl=2 
 I hope that my photos that I add directly to Openstreet maps will one day also be available on mapch.cz. I have already added tens of thousands of these photos. I want someone who works for Map.cz to be interested in this  https://youtu.be/WQ5hOkUS5rs?si=2rrLSx7Tp9AEaS6P
vojtechzaboril (2024-06-05 19:04:06+00:00): Hi, I forwarded your message to someone in mapy.cz, who will decide if it's possible to import and use your photos (and other's as well) from OSM.
vojtechzaboril (2024-06-06 20:01:05+00:00): Hi, we are not able to import those photos (they don't have compatible licence). 
Currently we are importing photos from wikimedia commons (compatible licence), if they are linked from wikidata (and the wikidata is linked from osm with wikidata=*).
Hope you understand.
Regards.
Jean-Louis Stanus (2025-05-30 07:57:30+00:00): Hello Pivertd, tu as enlevé le bicycle=yes dans cette modification.
Effectivement, cette route n'invite pas à la pratique du velo, néanmoins y a  t il un panneau l'indiquant? d'autre part cette route fait partie de la relation 197843 qui est une route velo.
Qu'en penses-tu?
Source : https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/byuser/Jean-Louis%20Stanus?username=Jean-Louis%20Stanus&source=29811
AR_Mapper (2024-06-04 07:03:30+00:00): Hi, there is no need for any personal attacks here. Edits to remove vandalism from the map are not "rude". As your edits are unverifiable and are consistent with common vandalism from Pokémon Go players the previous changeset was reverted. 

A beach has different features/requirements which define it, specifically "stretches of sand at the coast formed by wave action from the ocean", compared to a patch of mud/pebbles/sand the bank of a pond/lake or a certain type of surface. 

I understand you would like some beaches to appear in Wigan, so the next time Niantic update their map you might get access to a specific Pokémon; however, these are not beaches. They are either mistagged or are better defined by either mud or shingle. Please fully educate yourself on the following wiki pages to avoid further reverts on these edits by myself and other mappers who are upholding the integrity of the data in the map. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=beach
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=mud
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dshingle
RedRocker87 (2024-06-04 09:35:43+00:00): How are mud or shale tags relevant to a patch of sand?
Svanhildur (2024-06-04 12:36:35+00:00): Isn't it still correct to add this stop code, as it is used (even though rarely)? What would be the requirement for adding a stop code in Brussels?
bxl-forever (2024-06-04 17:15:06+00:00): Why do you need that, precisely?
Svanhildur (2024-06-05 08:55:29+00:00): I work on routing and need to link GTFS stops with OSM objects. Seems like ref:STIB_MIVB is tagged extensively (in no small part thanks to you :) ) and GTFS stop IDs *should* be mostly equivalent to it, so this tag can be used for linking purposes.
According to GTFS, every day first metro 6 towards Elisabeth starts at Heysel stop 8825. It's route is distinct from regular metro 6, which starts at Roi Baudoin and passes through Heysel stop 8824. Does this information regarding stop 8825 contradict reality?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-29 18:02:15+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11954416171/history has bicycle_parking = stand that was added in this edit
bicycle_parking=stands was probably intended here, right? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle_parking

note that if we have a single stand it is still bicycle_parking=stands
eteb3 (2025-11-29 18:13:13+00:00): Thanks, corrected
Rallioz (2024-07-02 08:14:08+00:00): Hi, die Treppe ist begehbar und als zusätzlicher Zugang zu Gleis 1 beschildert. Warum setzt du hier den access-key auf no? VG
Lionick (2024-07-02 11:34:22+00:00): Hallo, als ich dort war, war das Tor am oberen Ende der Treppe mit einem Schloss verschlossen; das scheint aber schon ein paar Monate her zu sein (hab das erst später in OSM nachgetragen). Wenn du aktuellere Informationen hast, lösche gerne das access=no wieder (auch an den barrier=gate an den Enden der Treppe). LG
Rallioz (2024-07-02 12:05:30+00:00): Alles klar, danke
Svanhildur (2024-06-04 12:36:02+00:00): Thanks, I made a mistake
bxl-forever (2024-06-04 17:14:37+00:00): No problem, you are welcome.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-07-10 16:11:55+00:00): voce repetiu o mesmo nome em varios lugares. desnecessario!
L'imaginaire (2024-06-04 06:50:43+00:00): En alweer verwijderd? Geef gerust een seintje mocht je vragen hebben.
NimdaBE (2024-06-04 06:55:13+00:00): Ik ben aan het uitzoeken hoe ik dit correct kan mappen op basis van de tags en instellingen van de reeds bestaande wandelknooppunt netwerken... Ik denk dat ik het nu een beetje door heb...
L'imaginaire (2024-06-05 15:14:29+00:00): Ok, top. Een mooi werkje, maar er komt wel wat bij kijken als je ermee start. Sta me toe om enkele opmerkingen te geven die ik ondertussen heb aangepakt, zodat jij verder kan:

Het wandelnetwerk was als lid van de routes 54-83 en 83-93 toegevoegd, terwijl dit omgekeerd moest zijn (de routes zijn lid van het netwerk, net zoals de knopen). Het wandelnetwerk zelf heb ik lid gemaakt van een "collection", nl. het "Wandelroutenetwerk Vlaanderen".

Voor de individuele routes gebruik je in plaats van "note" beter "ref", bijv. ref=83-93. Op die manier blijft de note-tag vrij om notes toe te voegen. De naam "Wandelnetwerk Dendervallei Noord" is verwarrend op de individuele routes, de ref is voldoende. 

Een goede tool om het mappen van knooppuntennetwerken op te volgen is Knooppuntnet, zie bijv. https://knooppuntnet.be/nl/analysis/network/17672938
Die geeft nog een foutje op route 54-83, omdat je het rondpunt volledig hebt toegevoegd, zonder een opdeling te maken tussen verschillende richtingen. Bij een wandelnetwerk zal dit trouwens doorgaans niet nodig zijn, meestal wordt voor heen en terug dezelfde kant gekozen op een rondpunt. Zonder ter plaatse te gaan, is dit vaak moeilijk uit te maken.
NimdaBE (2024-06-05 19:07:48+00:00): Ok, super bedankt om mij verder op weg te zetten. Ik denk dat ik het stilaan onder de knie begin te krijgen.
josmougn (2024-06-03 23:07:46+00:00): bonsoir,
C'est quoi votre source pour ce point : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11954396688 ?
Il n'y a rien à cet endroit.
PLima785 (2024-06-04 12:19:24+00:00): Cuidado com as duplicações, existe uma nova Rotunda e parte de uma avenida (Avenida Doutor José Vieira de Carvalho) meteste floresta em cima. já dei um jeito mas ver se existe mais gralhas. De resto está fixe
PLima785 (2024-06-04 12:20:20+00:00): ve o kartaview (é para onde carrego as imagens)
PedroMTG13 (2024-06-04 18:30:03+00:00): PLima, obrigado. Apesar das imagens bing serem as mais atualizadas ainda não tinham essa desenhada. E estava com as vias desligas
Pink Duck (2024-06-06 14:24:26+00:00): In the UK pedestrians are legally entitled to walk on all public roads unless signed otherwise, so there is no need to add the foot=yes tag as it is implicitly the case if ill-advised given sideway=no.
Jordi MF (2024-06-03 19:48:43+00:00): Me he equivocado. EL conjunto de cambios ha servido para eliminar la etiqueta "name" de varios "landuse" según indicaciones de la wiki.
streckenkundler (2024-06-03 20:05:55+00:00): Quelle?
AndresDuhour (2026-03-19 10:45:07+00:00): Hola! quería comentarte sobre los puentes peatonales. Por ejemplo en el boulevard san juan. Yo veo en las imágenes que son veredas que son parte de la calle. No sería mejor etiquetar la calle como sidewalk=both/right/left? Porque al ver el mapa uno esperaría puentes separados para las veredas y no están...  Qué te parece? Saludos, Andrés
soshial (2025-07-15 18:42:49+00:00): Reverted sac_scale to T2, because I didn't notice anything challenging (not a single time had to help balance with hands) on the route to Ceska koca.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-03 20:00:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1242689061

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
streckenkundler (2024-06-03 20:05:20+00:00): Welche Postseite meinst du? Bitte angeben! Ist diese  Seite OSM-nutzbar?
streckenkundler (2024-06-03 20:08:33+00:00): Welche Postseite meinst du? Bitte angeben! Ist diese Seite OSM-nutzbar?
lberges (2024-06-03 20:23:17+00:00): Die Info findet sich auf vielen Postseiten, drei als Beispiel: https://deu.postcodebase.com/search/node/ostenholz, 
http://plz.deu.info/gemeinde/03358501/, 
https://www.suche-postleitzahl.org/osterheide.l281f2
streckenkundler (2024-06-04 15:04:49+00:00): Bestehen Nutzungsrechte für OSM? Ich hab nichts gefunden!
SomeoneElse (2024-06-11 14:02:07+00:00): Just to confirm, under what licence is that data made available from those sites?
SomeoneElse (2024-06-11 14:02:42+00:00): Nur zur Bestätigung: Unter welcher Lizenz werden die Daten auf diesen Sites bereitgestellt?
lberges (2024-06-12 05:19:34+00:00): I used this sources to verify information, not to copy any data.
SomeoneElse (2024-06-12 09:23:18+00:00): Even when doing "I used this sources to verify information, not to copy any data", I suspect that you'd still need to understand the licence on that site and the terms on which you might be able to use it.
We're not going to have a full discussion about this in a changeset comment - you need to discuss it in the forum.
streckenkundler (2024-06-03 20:07:52+00:00): Quelle? Bust du dir sicher, daß das richtig ist, da es nebenan auch eine Hausnummer 14 gibt.. ?!?!?!?
arcanma (2024-06-12 10:36:42+00:00): Salve,
grazie per aver iniziato a contribuire a OSM.
Un paio di tratti di sterrata inseriti erano sovrapposti a tratti già esistenti, per cui li ho tolti
YoungHiro45 (2024-06-03 20:34:06+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2024-05-13
syntex (2024-06-07 19:05:45+00:00): This change is wrong. The tags are incorrect
KingVik (2024-06-08 06:50:53+00:00): Sorry I have fixed it up
thanks for calling my attention
syntex (2024-06-08 08:05:23+00:00): I fixed that, now you've changed the tag again to an incorrect one. It is not natural=forest! It is either landuse=forest or natural=wood
KingVik (2024-06-08 08:24:18+00:00): Alright
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-04 05:43:19+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152226144
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-04 05:43:49+00:00): #vandalism
mavl (2024-06-14 08:36:46+00:00): @vladislav_izh  
Здравствуйте. Не портите, пожалуйста, названия на карте. Ваши изменения отменены.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C
santamariense (2026-03-02 20:13:52+00:00): Olá  Ladário,

Do que se trata os nomes: João Victor, Fernanda Vieira e Rafaela Raffo?

Estão postos como nome da rua ou do prédio no endereço. Ser nome da rua, não faz sentido, pois o nome da rua é Comissário Justo. Agora, seria nome de morador que tu adicionou por engano?

Poderia confirmar?

santamariense
nevw (2024-06-04 00:07:08+00:00): Hi, welcome to osm.
I noticed the Rendezvous Grand Hotel Melbourne is mapped next to your entry of ‘crew hotel’ and would like to know if this is a duplication error?
Should I go ahead and delete your entry?
nevw (2024-06-05 21:25:20+00:00): Hi Cookie-monsta,
I have reverted this duplicate hotel entry in changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152305474
miluethi (2024-06-06 19:39:07+00:00): Atharval,

Please create rectangular shapes matching the satellite imagery. I'm going to delete all your (crappy) additions.
stillhart (2025-05-13 19:09:24+00:00): Hi. Just fyi
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcharge_point

one area is the charging station, one point is the charger :-)
ch_de_75 (2025-05-13 20:01:12+00:00): Hi, thanks that sounds OK. 
But why have you created a site to relate the objects? Wouldn't it be easier to relate the "charge points" to the "charging station"?
wombatmaper (2025-08-13 14:29:42+00:00): hey! why did you change the vegan=only to vegan=yes? Isnt everything vegan here?
eggie (2024-06-04 13:03:53+00:00): Dag Your Buddy

Kijk even naar die foutmedlingen.
warnings:impossible_oneway:highway
  	5
Je ziet nu oneway=yes straten die eindigen op een weg die nog op construction staat.
Is er wellicht ook een uitzondering voor fietsers op eenrichtingsverkeer.
Dus oneway:bicycle=no  ?

MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-03 22:00:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375874991

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-10 07:47:37+00:00): POPRAWIONO
RedAuburn (2024-06-03 21:54:01+00:00): also confirmed from os openmap
geomaniX (2025-05-30 06:58:15+00:00): Moin!
Ich bin gerade auf dieses Changeset gestoßen.
Befindet sich die Bushaltestelle "Edeka Center" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11954674578) wirklich auf dem Parkplatz vom Edeka? o.O

VG
geomaniX
Ökkel (2025-05-30 17:44:33+00:00): Ja, wirklich. Ist aber auch nur für den Bürgerbus.
rempshaener (2024-06-04 13:40:03+00:00): Hallo,
zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266935098 eine Anmerkung:
Da ein sport=shooting nicht automatisch "Schützenhaus" bedeutet, war der Name "Schützenhaus" m.E. in Ordnung. Jetzt hat das Haus den Namen des Vereins - der gehört maximal in den operator.
Viele Grüße
MHD (2024-06-04 14:41:51+00:00): Laut wiki sollen unter name= keine beschreibende Namen verwendet werden und Schützenhaus würde ich daruter einordnen. Weil das Haus ja sicher nicht so heißt und der Name des Vereins außen angeschrieben steht. Wenn das Gebäude mehrere Nutzer hätte wäre der Vereinsname als Punkt club=sport einzutragen.
rempshaener (2024-06-04 15:08:22+00:00): Ich bin grundsätzlich ein Verfechter des strengen "name ist nur der Name"-Prinzips. Ein amenity=parking darf z.B. nicht name=Parkplatz bekommen. Für ein Schützenhaus gibt es zum einen kein entsprechendes Tagging. Zum anderen ist keines der üblichen Ausschlusskriterien („Beschreibungen, Nummern/Referenzen, Adressen oder Anmerkungen") erfüllt, Schützenhaus stellt durchaus einen denkbaren Gebäudenamen dar.
In jedem Fall kann der Name eines Vereins nicht der Name des Gebäudes sein. Imho sollte dann besser kein Name dran.

Viele Grüße

P.S.: Ich bin mir wegen es sport=shooting nicht sicher; der Schießstand ist doch draußen?
MHD (2024-06-04 21:59:10+00:00): Wenn von drinnen nach draußen geschossen wird würde ich am Gebäude auch mit sport=shooting eintragen
rempshaener (2024-06-05 17:45:10+00:00): Ich meine das findet nur draußen statt, bin mir aber nicht sicher.
Viele Grüße
MHD (2024-06-05 21:55:14+00:00): Wenn das nur draußen ist dann leisure=pitch + sport=shooting wenn es auch teilweise innen oder von innen nach außen dann  sport=shooting auch an das Gebäude
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-03 22:44:18+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 152212288.
KiloThree (2024-06-04 15:00:13+00:00): Somerville Ave doesn't have a cycle track at any point, it's all on-street lane, at some points buffered.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152220019
SomeoneElse (2024-06-04 10:57:30+00:00): Hello,
What relation was 8465341  a duplicate of?
Best Regards,
Andy
Necessarycoot72 (2024-06-04 15:37:25+00:00): Relation 5200138.
SomeoneElse (2024-06-04 15:55:02+00:00): Thanks - no idea how I managed to miss that!
BCNorwich (2024-06-04 05:45:51+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

From the wiki "natural=beach" should only be used for inclined, wave formed areas at the coast. Thus for OSM this is not a beach. Would the tag leisure=swimming_area be OK? With a description tag =(whatever the area is used for)?

Regards Bernard.
rskedgell (2024-06-04 07:56:13+00:00): @BCNorwich It's a canal, so leisure=swimming_area is unlikely.
tastrax (2024-06-04 11:45:25+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
osmviborg (2024-06-04 05:11:07+00:00): Ruterne er samlet igen. Du skal ikke tegne separate cykelstier hvor vejen stierne løber langs er tagget med 'cycleway=track', det er tilfældet med Amager Strandvej.
Spry Map (2024-06-04 15:24:09+00:00): Unfortunately the cycling instructions on Amager Strandvej are incorrect because of this. It creates a situation where it looks like bikes can cross or turn when in fact it’s unsafe to.

I’d like to at least for the intersections make sure that the cycling instructions are accurate. I don’t believe that’s possible if we assume the bike lanes follow the same path as the car lanes?
osmviborg (2024-06-04 18:28:30+00:00): If you create a separate cycleway just delete any cycleway=track/lane on the main road
tastrax (2024-06-05 06:17:40+00:00): Its a national park and (at this location) so horse should be no. They are only allowed in certain types of parks/recreation/conservation areas
bernardo60 (2024-11-09 04:14:21+00:00): All these alleyways ("gang" in Indonesia) are too narrow for a four-wheeled vehicle to pass and should be tagged as a path, not a street.