piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
martinst (2025-05-04 11:27:35+00:00): Die App-Hersteller müssten bewegt werden die (vorhandenen) Daten wie gewünscht darzustellen. 
Die Daten zu ändern um eine bestimmte Darstellung (in einer spezifischen App) zu erreichen ist in OSM nicht erwünscht.
Es gibt sicher Grenzfälle, bei denen es Sinn macht (z.B. Firmengebäude mit Nummern), dass bei name= auch Zahlenwerte stehen, aber das sollte nicht zur allgemeinen Praxis werden.
Mich stört es nicht unbedingt wenn "255" beim Wanderweg auch bei name= steht, der in OSM allgemein vertretene Konsens düfte aber sein dass die Zahl da eigentlich nicht hingehört.
bike'n'hike (2025-05-25 10:51:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166729019

reverted name tagging ; name is the name only; tagging for the renderer

see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
&
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166729019
user_18023081 (2025-05-05 20:49:27+00:00): ???
PERFECTAS Y NOBLES (2025-05-26 14:17:31+00:00): This is just where we are at. 
MARTIN ENRIQUE SANTAMARIA LOPEZ
200 East Birdsong Street 
Longview, Texas 75602 
Read book FOREVER_YOUNG 
By MARTIN ENRIQUE SANTAMARIA
LordGarySugar (2025-05-27 14:08:52+00:00): What is this? Is it some kind of organisation or club? Is there a website or some information about it? Currently the tags used to describe it are incorrect.
PERFECTAS Y NOBLES (2025-05-27 18:48:51+00:00): No it is what is happening today and what has been happening forever just out of the public’s view. Our one and only FINGER OF GOD, LUCIFER. HE IS OUR GOD FROM THE BIBLE AND WELL A LOT OF INFORMATION I KNOW HAS BEEN KEPT SECRET FOR OBVIOUS REASONS WHEN I FOUND OUT. BUT YES SIR HE, AS WELL AS OTHER ENTITIES OF HIS INNER CIRCLE. ALL UNIQUE. PEOPLE COME WITH THEIR TECHNOLOGY INCOGNITO AND TAKE FOOTAGE, PICS ETC. ANYMORE QUESTIONS FEEL FREE TO ASK. ON MOST OCCASIONS, SAD TO SAY, VERY LITTLE THOUGHT IS GIVEN TO LIFE. LEAVING IT AT A PROCESS WITH CERTAIN PROCEDURES WITH RESULTS OF NOTHING BUT ITS DOUBTS OF WANTING TO START IT.
user_18023081 (2025-05-27 19:09:12+00:00): Reverted vandalism
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166840545
PERFECTAS Y NOBLES (2025-05-28 03:13:08+00:00): I’m not sure I’m following you on that could you please elaborate a little?
eggie (2025-05-03 07:49:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Alle begin is moeilijk.
Het trottoir was al getagd in de eigenschappen van het fietspad met side_walk=right.
Op de standaardkaart zie je dat echter niet. 
Het is gebruikelijker om dat zo te doen, want die langsliggende voetpaden routeren niet goed.
Je krijgt omwegen.
Verder je foutmeldingen warnings:almost_junction:highway-highway
  	2


  warnings:disconnected_way:highway
  	1
Dat komt omdat het voetpad nergens aan vastzit. Ik haal even het trottoir weg.
Het is immers al getagd in het fietspad.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-05-03 07:50:19+00:00): Nog een tip.. Geen adressen toevoegen aan gebouwomtrekken. Er zijn adresnodes.
eggie (2025-05-03 08:10:46+00:00): Hier wat leesvoer..
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Sidewalks
Codevoid (2026-01-06 19:08:47+00:00): Still gone. They removed a lot of those in the area.
user_5359 (2025-05-04 08:36:34+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1383215120 (one of three objetcs). What is the mean of the tags
Acreage = 0.69904
CATEGORY = III
COMMNTS = Berg 2015, Wilterwood 1993
CreationDa = 2020/12/02 16:01:07.472
Creator = cberg_cityofbi
DelinAvail = Yes
EditDate = 2020/12/02 16:01:07.472
Editor = cberg_cityofbi
F2004_Hab_ = 6
F2014_Hab_ = Low (3-4 points) 2014
GlobalID = 075df710-70af-47b2-a086-08173ec0cf3c
Hab_Buff = 0
OBJECTID = 163
OBJECTID_1 = 163
SOURCE = SJM
Shape__Are = 30450.080139160156
Shape__Len = 1247.7814466065893
Sq__Ft_ = 30450
Total_Buff = 80
WQ_Buff = 80
Watershed = MANZANITA
?
eggie (2025-05-03 07:53:56+00:00): oneway=no is default, maar bij zo'n parallelpad is het wel verstandig om dit als aanwijzing toe te voegen zodat een medemapper geen oneway=yes gaat taggen.

MVG
eggie
czubi (2025-05-06 16:35:38+00:00): Hallo Lutz,
Privatweg ist kein <eigennmae sondern eine (access) Eigenschaft.
Access hast du auf permissive gesetzt.
service =privatweg gibt es nicht. Was möchtest du eingetragen haben?
habe name und service=Privatweg gelöscht.
czubi (2025-05-06 16:41:06+00:00): und außerhalb der Gartenanlage ist es vermutlich auch kein access=permissive.
czubi (2025-05-06 16:51:32+00:00): ich bezweifle sogar das access permissive in der Gartenanlage stimmt.
Was stehen denn am Eingang der Gartenanlage für Straßenschilder?
LutzD (2025-05-07 04:27:12+00:00): Hallo, danke für deinen Beitrag. Das Grundstück wurde von mir Anfang 2024 gekauft und da die Gemeinde kein Interesse hatte. Wir haben an Allen Zugängen Schilder aufgestellt Einfahrt Verbot Privatweg Zutritt nur für Berechtigte. Weiter plane ich ein Tor zu erreichen. Da immer wieder Personen hier unterwegs sind möchte ich das hier nochmal deutlich machen. Daher auch die Namensgebung. BG Lutz.
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-04 00:30:48+00:00): Адрес уже записан в других тегах, не нужно его дублировать в name
Baloo Uriza (2025-05-05 13:42:41+00:00): Ref=* information is not a name and shouldn't be in name tags like alt_name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165747728
selillium (2025-05-12 06:28:22+00:00): These are the actual, in-use names in the region; for example, the address 3227 State Highway 6 South (street name given to stretches of both Highway 6 North and Highway 6 South) is commonly truncated to 3227 Highway 6 or 3227 Highway 6 North.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165747728
selillium (2025-05-12 06:36:25+00:00): Other variants include 3227 Hwy 6 and 3227 SH-6 N (at least that I’ve seen). I’ve defined the names with the context of the whole mass automated “name≠description” debacle that I was very specifically trying to avoid 🥲
Baloo Uriza (2025-05-13 00:14:40+00:00): "Highway 6 South" is not a valid name, neither is "State Highway 6 South".  These are refs, specifically called out in the wiki guidelines about names as being invalid.  The official name would be the correct entry for name in this case.  Where a highway has no name, only a number, then noname=yes would be appropriate.  Duplicating the ref value in name is never the correct name value.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165747728
selillium (2025-05-13 00:24:47+00:00): State Highway 6 South is quite literally the signed name used in my municipality; since that’s at best regional, I’ve excluded it from the route. On the other hand, AFAIK Highway 6 South is an incredibly common way to address the south-bound route, common enough that there are entire stretches of the route named after that. I would *really* like to avoid starting an edit war over something as silly as this.
selillium (2025-05-13 00:59:46+00:00): If this is egregious enough, then by all means, do correct my mistake. If you’d rather I do it, then sure, I can abide that.
selillium (2025-05-13 01:20:25+00:00): In my defense, I based my edit off the existing [wiki recommendation for route directionals](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Route_directions). AFAIK this style has been okayed by the community. I’m a bit confused about how I’m erring here when the example I used 1) has been approved and 2) does the exact thing that I’m doing.
user_5359 (2025-05-04 08:52:10+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/464476516. What is the mean of the tag CLASSREF = RLB-749ee35e-ce1d-4036-be85-ca1a5f4a99db?
kaitu (2025-05-04 19:37:54+00:00): None, it was a mistake. I corrected. Thanks for reporting it.
rhhs (2025-05-03 09:41:33+00:00): I know that since their merger, Ceiba pharmacies are rebranded to SOpharmacy, but this one is still Ceiba branded (unless it changed since I passed it 2 days ago?)
Dimitar155 (2025-05-22 07:20:29+00:00): It was signed as "Ceiba" yesterday (2025-05-21). Updated it accordingly.
dadavid (2025-05-04 00:26:25+00:00): Hi error081610, 

du hast hier aus dem Waldweg einen Hydranten gemacht, ich nehme mal an, das sollten eher zwei Objekte sein? :) 
Habs mal zurückgesetzt, schau gern nochmal drüber und füge den Hydranten dann einfach erneut hinzu :) 

Viele Grüße und weiterhin viel Spass beim Mappen

David
error081610 (2025-05-04 06:10:58+00:00): Oh, das war keine Absicht. Ich schaue mir das nochmal an.
rempshaener (2025-05-03 15:04:23+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
In diesem Änderungssatz hat sich ein kleiner Widerspruch eingeschlichen: Bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/722435917 passt der tracktype nicht zur surface.
Viele Grüße
eggie (2025-05-03 09:13:52+00:00): Dag QEd  .

Je vraagt om tips als starter.
Svp geen adresgegevens op gebouwomtrekken zetten. Er is een adresnode. Het huisnummer is overigens 3.
De naam van het gebouw kan wel op de omtrek. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-03 09:15:25+00:00): Voor een imker is trouwens een aparte tag.
craf=beekeeper
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft%3Dbeekeeper
Gr eggie
eggie (2025-05-03 09:17:26+00:00): Volgens de website is de naam Imkervereniging Zuidlaren
https://bijpraot.nl/index.php/imkervereniging/over/
QEd-P (2025-05-03 09:25:49+00:00): Hmm. Dat ga ik nog eens nakijken. Op mijn lidmaatschapskaart staat bijenhoudersvereniging. Ik zoek de officieëe stukken even na.
eggie (2025-05-03 09:29:32+00:00): Top...  Het adres heb ik verwijderd.
Dat is een adres verderop bij de ijsbaan. De website geeft ook nr 3 aan. Die adresnode is aanwezig.
mtmail (2025-08-10 11:31:41+00:00): Please use the sandbox for testing. Adding fake data to OpenStreetMap, and even in the center of London, isn't good. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing
map per (2025-05-06 12:47:27+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Hab noch 'type=multipolygon' gelöscht, weil der See als einfache Fläche und nicht als Multipolygon eingezeichnet ist. Ansonsten sieht die Änderung gut aus, danke!
Fraxi (2025-05-03 10:34:39+00:00): Здравей!
С Dimitar155 сме коментирали тази улица преди време и, по негови думи, е добре да остане без име заради евентуални проблеми с навигацията. Разбирам, че си видял знак.
flurger (2025-05-29 17:06:13+00:00): Entfernt durch Änderungssatz 166933869 da bereits vorhanden.
divaddivag (2025-05-05 08:22:25+00:00): Bonjour Nicolas, les trackers solaires (https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/tracker-solaire-agricole/21573) ne seraient-ils pas à exclure du challenge Maproulette puisque l'emprise dépend de l'heure à laquelle est faite la prise de vue aérienne et du parallaxe? De plus, le panneau est positionné à la verticale lorsqu'il est mis à l’arrêt. À mon avis un noeud suffit donc pour ces installations solaires particulières. 

David
SpinOff (2025-05-03 18:29:28+00:00): Hej. Przeczytaj rozdział "Nazwa jest tylko nazwą" na tej stronie: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy

"Droga pożarowa 56" prawdopodobnie nie jest oficjalną nazwą tej drogi.
rskedgell (2025-08-10 19:08:53+00:00): Please don't use the live OpenStreetMap database for testing.
eggie (2025-05-03 09:36:48+00:00): Dit 'mag' helaas niet. Dat is dubbel taggen.
Er is een adresnode.. Daar staat de info van de vereniging op. 
Op de meeste kaarten zie je geen huisnummers. Op deze layer zie je alleen een huisnummer als er geen verder info op staat.
Het is nu oke. 
Huisnummers zijn uiteraard vindbaar.
eggie (2025-05-03 09:37:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4025967410
eggie (2025-05-03 09:33:29+00:00): Hoi...  De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.
Adresnode hoort op een gebouw. 
social_centre doet niets in OSM ik heb er een community_centre van gemaakt. (Clubhuis)  
Het zijn allemaal van die weetjes waar je langzamerhand aldoende achterkomt.
Veel plezier met mappen. 
eggie
user_5359 (2025-05-04 09:15:03+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1383229776. Which value is correct
Lit=yes or lit=no?
rademalis (2025-05-08 17:37:40+00:00): Witaj. Prawidłowa wartość to:  lit=no
Hello The correct value is: lit=no
luiswoo (2025-05-07 20:52:18+00:00): Почему изсчез leisure=pitch, но остался sport=soccer — схема тегирования не менялась.
RiG's (2025-05-07 21:33:20+00:00): OsmAnd так отправил правку. Исправил
Zunyu (2025-05-04 06:27:41+00:00): Hello.
Could you please define name:ja in addition to name:ja-hira and name:ja-Latn? I had fixed thier name the other day, but it seems to have been removed again. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/341906
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/358631
It appears that your edits do not include name:ja. Without it, depending on the user's PC environments,name:en may be prioritized, whichi could result in insufficient search results in Japanese. Thank you for your cooperation.
tartiflex (2025-05-07 09:29:50+00:00): Hi,
I will put it back, although I must admit I'm surprised that some systems don't display the local language by default. I've never personally encountered such a problem, perhaps it's specific to Japanese.
Zunyu (2025-05-07 12:17:55+00:00): Thank you. I hadn't realized it until recently either, but when I tried using Ubuntu on Linux, I noticed that if name:ja is missing, it is treated as if Japanese is undefined.
SpinOff (2025-05-03 18:31:12+00:00): Hej. Zakładam że to nie jest oficjalna nazwa tej ulicy, więc nie możesz użyć tagu name w taki sposób. Przeczytaj rozdział "Nazwa jest tylko nazwą" na tej stronie: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:02:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:56:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
aharvey (2025-05-04 23:40:04+00:00): If there's nothing left on the ground should it even be mapped here at all? There's OpenHistoricalMap for historical features. If it is kept in OSM then abandoned means there's still some evidence on the ground, according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_decay it seems it might be razed?
kylesey (2025-05-05 08:32:38+00:00): Other lines that closed at a broadly similar time (1950s-1960s) and have little to no physical features left are in OSM/ORM though? I am currently in Germany and this type of decades-old closed line are still everywhere, especially where similar to this one they have clearly had a big influence on the shape of property boundaries and modern road layouts as we can see on the section between Hawkesbury River heading west through North Richmond town. I see your point but in my personal opinion I would like to see these old former rail alignments with nothing left in the ground still displayed so people can see what we lost, where things are similar, what lead to the modern features of the area certainly when they were previously a key part of the landscape and have an ongoing if not obvious presence.
aharvey (2025-05-06 04:16:01+00:00): I don't have a strong opinion either way, so I'm okay to leave them if you want.

I re-read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:railway regarding abandoned vs razed:

"The course of a former railway which has been abandoned and the track removed. The course is still recognized through embankments, cuttings, tree rows, bridges, tunnels, remaining track ties, building shapes and rolling or straight ways. For demolished rails that are no longer identifiable, e.g. that have been built over, some use the highly questionable railway=razed."

It don't know about here, but it seems like some places especially through houses are more railway=razed than railway=abandoned. To be abandoned would required at least some evidence visible by most people on the ground.
bartgron (2025-05-03 13:47:14+00:00): Nazwa "Kapliczka" jest zbędna ponieważ jest nazwą opisową, jeśli jest określony rodzaj obiektu na mapie to nie należy dodawać dodatkowo nazwy, usunę ją zaraz
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:01:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
grzegorz75jan (2025-05-03 15:16:44+00:00): Wszystko poszło do kosza.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165764432
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:58:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
rhhs (2025-05-03 16:21:52+00:00): I see you are spending a lot of effort to add quotation marks to some object names. I know this is common in Bulgarian, but on OSM a tradition has evolved to not use them. I can't judge if one or the other is correct, but in this case the name of the station as shown on the signs is without quotation marks so here your edit is wrong, I think. I removed them again.
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:58:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:59:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:01:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:55:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
bartgron (2025-05-03 13:44:48+00:00): Witaj, jeśli dobrze widzę dodałeś chodniki na terenie Kościoła które nie łączą się z żadną inną drogą ani chodnikiem. Żeby droga była użyteczna, musi być połączona z jakąś inną rzeczą
grzegorz75jan (2025-05-03 15:16:45+00:00): Wszystko poszło do kosza.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165764432
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:54:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
grzegorz75jan (2025-05-03 15:19:48+00:00): Wszystko poszło do kosza.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165764560
bartgron (2025-05-03 13:42:37+00:00): Jeśli dodałeś stację paliw to można zamknąć uwagę którą w tym miejscu dodałeś?
Patryk O (2025-05-03 14:07:52+00:00): Nie są zaznaczone nowe budynki (te które znajdują się na mapie są chyba po starym SKR a na pewno są już wyburzone), nie zrobiłem też dojazdów ponieważ nie chcę robić tego na oko, jeśli ktoś ma dokładne dane proszę o uzupełnienie
bxl-forever (2025-05-03 12:42:22+00:00): Hello "Did I do that", and welcome to OSM.

You discovered that StreetComplete is a nice app to keep information up to date.

However, please make sure to only insert correct data in OSM.  If people do careless mapping, our data can quickly get corrupted and become unreliable.

In this edit, you were asked to confirm the items collected by the Oliobox container.  Those are orange containers that take cooking oil.

I see that you ticked the answers that it accepts cooking oil and glass bottles.
recycling:cooking_oil=yes + recycling:glass_bottles=yes.

This is not correct.  The glass container run by Bruxelles-Propret/Net Brussel is another object in OSM: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1200215697

I will undo your edit and restore correct data on the map.
bartgron (2025-05-03 14:04:22+00:00): Błędny opis zestawu zmian
bartgron (2025-05-03 14:04:06+00:00): Błędny opis zestawu zmian, błędy w mapowaniu
grzegorz75jan (2025-05-03 15:19:49+00:00): Wszystko poszło do kosza.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165764560
tiptracks (2025-05-05 14:32:36+00:00): Paar opmerking/correcties mbt dit gebied

Ben zo vrij geweest de naam te corrigeren (..hoes ipv ..huus). 

Verder alle info mbt community center op de node gezet en tags aangevuld.

De omschrijving 'Meerdere bijenkasten...' hoort niet thuis op de name-tag. Deze heb ik daarom verhuisd naar de description.
kamilbogacki (2025-05-03 20:32:54+00:00): Hej, czemu służy ten zdublowany park?
bartgron (2025-05-03 14:03:39+00:00): Błędny opis zestawu zmian
Dimitar155 (2025-05-03 13:17:23+00:00): Здравей Cat2006,

Името на станцията не е променено (освен ако не е имало друго решение след https://council.sofia.bg/documents/d/guest/r-232-2025).

Поздрави,
Митко
silversurfer83 (2025-05-03 16:03:59+00:00): Hi :)

wenn keine Reste mehr sichtbar sind ist es i.O. die Wege zu löschen.

Wenn vor Ort noch erkennbar ist, dass hier Wege waren, dann sollten wir die sogenannten Lebenszyklus Präfixe nutzen um dies Kenntlich zu machen.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165753078
bartgron (2025-05-03 14:01:10+00:00): Błędny opis zestawu zmian
bartgron (2025-05-03 14:00:36+00:00): Jesteś pewny że w tym miejscu jest staw? Dodatkowo błędny opis zestawu zmian ponieważ zmiany nie dotyczą policji
yrtimiD (2025-05-03 14:15:08+00:00): Hi, why place=neighbourhood? let's discuss before you change them all!
yrtimiD (2025-05-03 15:26:24+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/place-is-suburb-quarter-or-neighbourhood/129560
Tsur Halamish (2025-05-03 15:52:59+00:00): Hi
I looked again the last days on it since you raised the topic...

Note the OSM definition for neighbourhood: 

A neighbourhood is a smaller named, geographically localised place within a suburb of a larger city or within a town or village. 
From: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=neighbourhood

Raanana has lots of neighborhoods and they are also referred by us the locals here as שכונה, a neighborhood.
yrtimiD (2025-05-03 19:04:53+00:00): Thanks for response!
Yes, this exact definition in wiki made me think that city must be firstly divided to suburbs and only then each suburb can be sub-divided to neighbourhoods. 

Statistically it looks like I'm not the only one which uses suburb for שכונה, so I'd like to try to align this with the community.

At the moment we'll have a good agreement there, I promise to fix the Raanana if needed.
Tsur Halamish (2025-06-06 12:47:34+00:00): היי,
אחרי שבדקת בערים השונות, תוכל להעביר את שכונות רעננה להיות 
neighborhood
הבטחת :-)
user_5359 (2025-05-04 08:39:20+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/12805921473. What is the mean of the tag ALLIQ = 4 (did you mean ref or ref:operator)?
Lieckio (2025-05-04 11:39:00+00:00): Accidental tag; probably was supposed to be "name:en=ALLIQ"
Anas masuris (2025-05-03 21:25:10+00:00): Dodałem tam jeszcze natural=wetland - dobrze oznaczyłeś jako niecka retencyjna :)

Pamiętałem, że kiedyś był artykuł o tym: https://www.whitemad.pl/w-centrum-warszawy-powstaje-kolejna-zielona-oaza-to-nowatorski-ogrod-deszczowy/
Sylabowy Kot (2025-05-04 10:50:21+00:00): Domyślałem się, że w tym miejscu nie zrobili by przypadkowo takiej niecki (zapomniałem nazwy), ale coś nie chciało mi się szukać :D
the-wouter (2025-05-03 12:32:02+00:00): Hey,
This bench was already added on 15 April by another mapper, so now it's duplicate on the map. I've removed the second bench.
silversurfer83 (2025-05-03 16:06:41+00:00): Hi :)

du hast in das Feld "inscription" den Wert "Ja." geschrieben. Dort sollte der Text hin, der auf ein Objekt geschrieben steht. Bei Bänken sowas wie "Gestiftet von Helga und Bert" oder "Siggi Gedächtnisbank"

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165754449
Kovoschiz (2025-05-03 16:36:42+00:00): This is obviously wrong. The road has very visible bridge joints. It's the `tunnel=culvert` that should be corrected.
vectorial8192 (2025-05-04 09:31:28+00:00): Well, for example, a careful observer can also see bridge joints at Tai Chung Road, Tsuen Wan. Then, should Tai Chung Road also be retagged as bridge=yes?
Kovoschiz (2025-05-06 08:26:08+00:00): Sure, this can certainly be discussed. Decked nullahs are not exactly `tunnel=culvert` in the sense of being built to an integrated structure. But in any case, they are different from the one here, which is clearly a short bridge-like structure.