piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Higashimado (2026-05-01 14:10:49+00:00): 您好，感谢您对韶关的活跃贡献！

当前对各级行政单位的标注，国内社区的共识和惯例是中心的 place 节点 + 作为行政管辖范围的 boundary 关系。place 节点用于渲染名字和表现无指定边界的人口集中区域（即“镇中心”或“村中心”）。boundary 关系用于划定指定的行政范围（通常远大于“村中心”的含义）。

如果要表示建成区域，建议使用 landuse=residential；将 place 用在区域上仅在“超出这个区域就不能叫这个名字时”才使用。

建议参考国内其他较为完善的地区的编辑惯例。我们可以在此或在社群进行更多讨论。
Pink Duck (2026-05-01 08:44:19+00:00): Have they all been relabelled as 'Bring Bank's?
lyctkel (2026-05-01 15:54:15+00:00): Hi Pink Duck,
so far I have only renamed the ones that were once named Mini-Recycling.
As far as I can see there are 6 more in Norwich.
Kind regards,
lyctkel
hellflower (2026-04-30 16:40:30+00:00): Hi MxxCon, I was about to close Caputo's when I saw that you already had. Could you please explain why you left the name on the building, along with their contact info, etc? Thanks!
MxxCon (2026-04-30 16:45:01+00:00): I used EveryDoor to mark it is closed and that's how it does it.
MxxCon (2026-05-01 02:36:30+00:00): If you think other info should be removed, I'm not against it. It was just something that I quickly did when I saw the article of them shutting down and wanted to do it before I forget.
TheSwavu (2026-05-01 10:07:22+00:00): Hi,

Roundabouts such as w1238797450 should have a junction=roundabout tag.

Thanks.
Solaris07 (2026-05-01 11:08:08+00:00): Hey, that was a pre-existing way and I forgot to check the tags. My bad
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-30 13:51:35+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong here. You renamed a street to your HQ ...

Best regards.
mavl (2026-06-07 06:02:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183764451, 183764460, 183764431, 183764453, 183764448, 183764459, 183764455 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20768].
mavl (2026-06-07 06:01:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183764451, 183764460, 183764431, 183764453, 183764448, 183764459, 183764455 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20768].
Patr1k_P (2026-05-02 07:23:42+00:00): zdravim, uz je to par rokov, co sa dohodlo, ze slovo ulica sa do nazvu nedava, sa cudujem ze ste si to este nevsimli...tu je napr. Trnava kde je vidiet ze to Dodko automaticky vynechava (je to inou farbou)

https://aplikacie.eu/ra/hladat.php?menu=hladat&countyIdentifier=20&municipalityIdentifiers=2598&districtIdentifiers=4536
Patr1k_P (2026-05-02 07:29:03+00:00): a vo vela adresach mate chyby, len namatkou som pozrel tieto

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246847186/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246847380/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246847470/history
holubekp (2026-05-03 08:50:24+00:00): No, všimol som si, len neviem komu mám dať prednosť. Či Dodkovi, alebo portálu ministerstva vnútra SR, ktorý prevzal názvy z VZN č.2-2025 obce Opoj. Nuž ale keď ministerstvo pochybilo, názvy opravím.
Je škoda, že údaje na stránkach aplikacie.eu/ra sú zastaralé. Musel som preto viac ako 400 adries v obci  prepisovať jednu po druhej ručne. Nestihol som to ešte podrobne skontrolovať, ale už na tom pracujem.
Patr1k_P (2026-05-07 11:56:17+00:00): no mohli ste sa najprv opytat ako sa to da efektivnejsie opravit, po jednom to robit je nezmysel..stacilo len opravit nazov ulice a adresy, ktore patria k danej ulici sa daju naraz oznacit a prepisat
KingVik (2026-06-10 10:15:20+00:00): reverted due poor-quality import and not following community guideline
KingVik (2026-06-11 09:53:00+00:00): Reverted poor quality edit and AI imported data without following community guideline
KingVik (2026-06-11 10:00:40+00:00): Reverted poor quality edit and AI imported data without following community guideline
KingVik (2026-06-11 09:52:33+00:00): Reverted this edit due to Poor quality import and not following community guideline
Pichet Pumpruk (2026-04-30 12:10:23+00:00): from google street: https://www.google.com/maps/@13.8472278,100.5012656,3a,75y,89.63h,82.29t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sX3VUH5VmB3zmQSpUIttJpA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D7.710936937393171%26panoid%3DX3VUH5VmB3zmQSpUIttJpA%26yaw%3D89.63422273239608!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDQyNy4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
aceman444 (2026-06-02 23:16:16+00:00): Hi, what is the entrance at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13780731014 good for? It can be bypassed via the other footway (not connected to the entrance) so it probably isn't the main entrance to the SAV campus. Is it the main entrance to the guardhouse (Vratnica) ? Why is that interesting?
I guess the main entrance is at the gate through the fence.
ScarlettB (2026-06-03 06:02:21+00:00): Well, it's the main entrance to the building and I included it because it's there - if it exists, onto the map it goes. But I can see how the main value could be confusing on the guardhouse when it's so close to the main gate into the campus. I think  it's valuable on the institute buildings though, because they tend to have many entrances from multiple sides.

I didn't think of setting the gates as main entrances into the fenced area, but I suppose there's no reason not to?
aceman444 (2026-06-03 18:57:33+00:00): Yes, I agree there should be some entrance=main object that indicates where to enter the campus. I just dispute why it is on a node on the guardhouse where people normally do not go. I think it should be on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13771801471 and the gate on the other side of the road too (if both can be used equally to enter the campus).
ScarlettB (2026-06-03 20:37:36+00:00): I'm sorry, I may have made my intent unclear. I wasn't saying the main entrance to the campus should be on the guardhouse, that was never the intention. We're not in disagreement here, the main entrance to the campus are indeed both gates on each side of the road.
aixbrick (2026-04-30 15:34:58+00:00): Hallo,
highway=trunk setzt voraus, dass die Straße kreuzungsfrei ausgeführt ist, d.h. es gibt Ein- und Ausfahrten (wie bei einer Autobahn). Das ist hier nicht der Fall.
Gruß
Chriwro (2026-04-30 15:42:58+00:00): Laut Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk#Deutschland

heißt es: "Schnellstraßen gibt es in zahlreichen Varianten: Als Kraftfahrstraße (Kfz-Straße), als Kraftfahrstraße in Form eines Autobahnzubringers, als gut ausgebaute Landstraße mit oder ohne Verbot von Fahrrädern und/oder Fußgängern. Es ist daher wichtig, die Tags motorroad=*, bicycle=* und foot=* korrekt anzugeben. Die Straßenkategorie (Gemeinde-, Kreis-, Landes- oder Bundesstraße) hat keinen Einfluss. Siehe auch Beispiele für die Notwendigkeit eines flexiblen Einordnens von Straßen."

Zudem führt das taggen als Primary dazu dass hier fälschlicherweise Mopeds entang geroutet werden. Trunk verhindert dies. Da dies keine Autobahn ist, ist Trunk nun mal die beste Option und laut Deutschem Wiki Eintrag die einzige Option diesen Straßentyp zu taggen
Chriwro (2026-04-30 15:49:29+00:00): Ok, hab an der falschen Stelle im Wiki geschaut... Dann bleibt dennoch das Problem des Routings in manchen Apps. Betrifft aber nicht die Karte
aixbrick (2026-05-01 08:18:07+00:00): Genau, lt. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany sollte motorroad=yes reichen.
Danke fürs Zurücksetzen.
eggie (2026-04-30 14:04:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Je hebt de placenode van Wildervank een eind versleept. Dat zal denk ik niet de bedoeling zijn.
Wan
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-30 14:05:22+00:00): Wanneer De Pauw de naam is can het pand kan deze beter als name=..  op de gebouwomtrek.
eggie (2026-04-30 14:08:35+00:00): Ik heb de placenode van Wildervank teruggezet.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=182031184

MVG
eggie
TonDek (2026-04-30 14:47:34+00:00): Dank je,doe dit voor het eerst,sorry
Hoe moet ik dan de naam aanpassen?
Ik zie wel dat je osm.wiki/tag:name= stuurt,maar hoe moet ik dat doen?
eggie (2026-04-30 14:59:00+00:00): Hoi,

Je kunt het gebouw selecteren.
Dan gaat er links een venster open. 
Dan klik je links in het venster op Tags. Dan kun je regels aanvullen.
bv name=De Pauw
historic=yes
Evt nog meer historische tags als die van toepassing zijn.
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:heritage#Netherlands

Ik gebruik zelf die editor niet.
Probeer maar gewoon. Ik kijk later wel.
Probeer niet met de kaart te schuiven in editmodus ander gaat Wildervank weer op de loop. :)
eggie (2026-04-30 15:02:07+00:00): Zie ook https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:historic
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-03 07:08:31+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182133801
eggie (2026-04-30 19:25:45+00:00): Wanneer die bebording is aangepast zal het vast correct zijn. 
Gr eggie
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-03 07:08:15+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182133801
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-03 07:12:07+00:00): User has been block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20222
Vmosnokia31 (2026-05-01 19:16:36+00:00): 👋Chào bạn. Tôi từng đi qua thấy có cây cầu sắt tạm ở đây nhưng lúc đó chưa được thông, không biết tại sao bạn cho là không có nhỉ? Hay người ta đã gỡ cây cầu?
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-05-02 05:56:00+00:00): Ở đây không có cây cầu bạn ạ, tôi có đi qua nhiều nên biết chỗ này không có cầu
Vmosnokia31 (2026-05-02 06:17:20+00:00): Lạ nhỉ, bởi vì tôi đi qua đây có cây cầu tạm được lắp được hai tháng rồi, nhưng chưa được thông qua. Bên P.Trịnh Đình Cửu người ta đang làm giếng thoát nước lên cầu chưa mở. Để khi nào tôi xuống kiểm chứng
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-05-02 06:35:14+00:00): Ok bạn, chắc có thể có chút nhầm lẫn
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-01 05:14:40+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13780906310

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse (2026-05-03 15:58:03+00:00): Hello,
It looks like your edits in Llanberis have broken the Snowdonia Slate Trail.  You can see the gap here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11114801#map=19/53.117194/-4.120413 .
My recollection of this bit of Llanberis (from a while ago) is that there are fairly wide walkable areas.  Where does the signage of the "Snowdonia Slate Trail" direct people?
Best Regards,
Andy
North14 (2026-05-04 11:03:10+00:00): Hi Andy, thanks for pointing that out. Sorry if I caused that break. It wasn't my intention. Can you fix it? I've never edited trails before. With the sidewalks and footpaths I’ve added, we’d just need to decide whether the trail should remain on the road or be assigned to one of the sidewalks. The south sidewalk seems particularly suitable to me, since it appears to be a bit wider and has been repaved in recent weeks. But I can't say right now exactly how the trail is marked at that spot.
SomeoneElse (2026-05-04 11:09:33+00:00): Usually the positioning of the signs would tell you where the path should go?
SomeoneElse (2026-05-07 10:32:04+00:00): I've filled in the gap; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11114801#map=19/53.117194/-4.120413 .  My recollection here is that you'd just "walk across the road" here, but it needs someone to Actually Go There to see where the signage points and adjust as necessary.
North14 (2026-05-08 09:12:59+00:00): Thanks for the repair. I looked online for information about the signage position on the Slate Trail in Llanberis, but unfortunately couldn't find anything. I think you're right—we'll just have to wait until someone on-site checks the trail routing.
KingVik (2026-06-10 10:22:04+00:00): Reverted due poor quality mapping and not following community guideline
silversurfer83 (2026-05-03 11:48:44+00:00): Hi there :)

I have some questions or remarks regarding this edit:

- you nestled buildings within buildings. Please don't do that. See building=* on how to map buildings.

- Some building footprints look very unlikely. Please check isf these are all true.

- Do all these buildings really have a name=* as described in the wiki?

- for some reason you mapped bulding and landuse in Lake Eerie. Other mappers already cleaned that up.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182033637
Taya_S (2026-05-07 17:43:47+00:00): Unfortunately, all edits by this users are complete fiction.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20253

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182350269
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182350314
SomeoneElse (2026-05-07 10:38:22+00:00): (somewhat related to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182032968 ) you've added a separate sidewalk https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1506893728 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1214633815 but haven't tagged that road as "sidewalk=separate" or similar.  That's necessary so that maps that actually show sidewalks can do so.  You can see that at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#15/53.1192/-4.1267 - there you can see that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/806805686 is shown with a wider casing because it is tagged as "sidewalk=both" (which should now be "sidewalk=separate") but is not, because it has no "sidewalk" tag.
SomeoneElse (2026-05-07 10:40:40+00:00): See also comment at https://en.osm.town/@SK53/115017119561900374 "Unlike virtually every other #OpenStreetMap feature it [separate sidewalk mapping] is not resilient when incomplete."
North14 (2026-05-08 09:22:33+00:00): Thanks for your comments - in this case as well :-). I'll keep that in mind and add "sidewalk=separate" to my updates.
P.S.: I fully agree that mapping separate sidewalks doesn't work when incomplete.
dmjab13 (2026-04-30 18:29:41+00:00): crazy bounding box.
Layft Greater (2026-07-13 12:36:21+00:00): Hi! Tunnels must be accompanied with a warning road sign. If no sign - not a tunnel

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1506900127
themi97 (2026-07-13 16:19:27+00:00): Hi! This is an underpass of the minor road. It is a tunnel as it can be seen in the construction in the satellite images. There is for sure a sign but someone needs to drive there and check the height restrictions.
Layft Greater (2026-07-13 17:00:45+00:00): Unfortunately, satelite imagery is not helpful here. Road signs are not visible from above.
By the road sign I mean a specific one: "tunnel ahead" sign. Presence of that sign makes a tunnel - a tunnel.
silversurfer83 (2026-05-03 09:11:10+00:00): Hi,

seid ihr euch das ganz sicher, bei diesem Weg? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388754466
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182035071
Access Claims (komoot) (2026-05-06 15:37:52+00:00): vielen Dank für Ihre Rückfrage.
Die Anpassung basierte auf einer Meldung einer lokalen Tourismusorganisation, die in der Region tätig ist und uns darüber informiert hat, dass die betroffenen Abschnitte veraltet sind und nicht mehr zur Verfügung stehen.
silversurfer83 (2026-05-06 16:48:02+00:00): Danke für die Reaktion.

Deshalb setzt ihr einen Weg einfach auf access=no

Seid ihr sicher, dass es nicht einfach um einen Wanderweg geht, der nicht mehr ausgeschildert ist.

Kommt mir sehr abwegig vor (pun intended)
silversurfer83 (2026-05-08 11:16:53+00:00): Wie ist hier der Stand?
silversurfer83 (2026-05-14 07:30:30+00:00): revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182633314

Leute. Auch wenn ihr jetzt einer Firma gehört, die nur versucht den letzten Cent aus komoot herauszupressen solltet Ihr hier vernünftig mitarbeiten.
fs_LT (2026-05-28 04:23:32+00:00): Sehr gut! Ich prüfe auch gerade andere CS von denen
stillhart (2026-04-30 19:34:10+00:00): Thank you very much!
stillhart (2026-04-30 19:34:53+00:00): But where is the access road? is it really a dirt track, which would be unusual for Tesla.
bxl-forever_repair (2026-05-01 16:01:18+00:00): Hello.

As you have probably understood, we will not personally survey every place where people open notes. With an average of 50 new notes per day on our territory, this would be unfeasible.

You provided very little useful information for your note, not even a link, putting the burden of research on the local volunteers to locate this charger.  I don’t think it is fair to blame us for not checking the road as well.

You may have a valid point that perhaps this road has been upgraded recently.  That is a legitimate concern.  If you are willing to help and if you have the possibility to pass by, feel free to help.

Thanks.
didier2020 (2026-05-01 07:31:58+00:00): Hello,
you must be using the wrong command with iD
because you are creating multiple changesets
which are generating duplicate ways and nodes
(exactly the same coordinates and exactly the same attributes)

exemple :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182035423
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182035424
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182035425
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182035426
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182035428
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182035429
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182035430
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182035431
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182035432
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182035433
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182035434
didier2020 (2026-05-01 07:34:38+00:00): You can see issues with osmose :
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/issues/open?item=1230&class=1,3&username=Abaluni_Lyft
technician_lyft (2026-05-01 13:58:36+00:00): Hi didier2020,

I am Rostom, Lead on OSM mapping team at Lyft.

Thank you for flagging this! We will review our published changesets and remove all detected duplicate ways and nodes.

We've identified and fixed an internal tooling issue that was likely the root cause of this behavior, and we will continue monitoring our future changesets to make sure this does not continue to happen.

Appreciate your patience and the helpful Osmose link!
KingVik (2026-06-10 10:44:32+00:00): Reverted due to poor edits
KingVik (2026-06-10 10:45:10+00:00): Reverted due to poor quality edits
KingVik (2026-06-10 10:31:18+00:00): Reverted due to poor quality and not following the community guideline for importing
KingVik (2026-06-11 10:13:44+00:00): Yeah, there is a problem, after reverting the node is still there so that is what I am actually cleaning up 
Check here for example : https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-26.14028/27.98323
woodpeck (2026-06-11 10:17:58+00:00): I am aware that stray nodes have remained in some areas and will remove them. Don't bother doing it manually.
KingVik (2026-06-11 10:21:26+00:00): Alright thank you so much
I had to start cleaning it up because I saw many discussions around it,
I have to stop now, thanks for your great work and help on this
KingVik (2026-06-10 10:32:51+00:00): reverted due to poor quality edits
KingVik (2026-06-10 10:48:19+00:00): Reverted due to Poor quality edits
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
KingVik (2026-06-10 10:48:59+00:00): Reverted due to poor quality edits
dzamper (2026-05-22 09:47:59+00:00): highway=living_street nie oznacza ważności drogi, tylko Strefę zamieszkania
AndyB_66 (2026-04-30 15:14:15+00:00): W tym budynku są również lokale mieszkalne i nie nosi on nazwy "Kancelaria Adwokacka..." - edycja błędna i niezgodna z zasadami, więc wycofuję.
mavl (2026-06-07 06:02:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183764451, 183764460, 183764431, 183764453, 183764448, 183764459, 183764455 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20768].
IvanaŠokčević (2026-05-06 07:45:30+00:00): Merged back Waverly Road based on street signs. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182281737 #OptimoRoute
eggie (2026-04-30 19:24:08+00:00): Oke... toch gelukt!
Gr eggie
wouterko (2026-07-31 11:04:07+00:00): Hi Jeroen, op de give_way nodes heb je abusievelijk give_way:direction gebruikt i.p.v. direction=.
JeroenvanderGun (2026-07-31 21:06:13+00:00): Dat doe ik met opzet, analoog aan het gebruik van traffic_signals:direction=* in plaats van direction=* bij highway=traffic_signals. Ik vind het onlogisch en onwenselijk om haaientanden anders te behandelen dan verkeerslichten wat dit betreft.
wouterko (2026-07-31 21:32:14+00:00): Begrijp waar je vandaan komt. Denk dat het bij traffic_signals zo gedaan wordt omdat er ook andere tags op dezelfde node geplaatst worden. Hierdoor kan het ambigu zijn waar de direction tag betrekking op heeft. Bij give_way is er geen andere informatie (in ieder geval volgens de huidige norm)

Het is niet handig om zomaar af te wijken van de norm zoals gesteld op de wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dgive_way. Software dat rekening houdt met de give_way tag kan niet opeens deze afwijking herkennen. Ik kwam op deze changeset omdat foutdetectiesoftware als Osmose deze nodes markeert vanwege een missende 'direction' tag. Als je het niet eens bent met een geldende norm kan dat eventueel via het forum of een proposal ter discussie gesteld worden, maar tot die tijd graag de geldende norm hanteren.
LudovicG (2026-06-23 07:19:34+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour vos contributions.
J'avais une question sur le DolceSpina : pourquoi avoir retiré le "contact:housenumber" qui semble constant ? (je l'ai remis avec de nouvelles infos sur le commerce)
temmie18 (2026-06-24 12:30:55+00:00): Bonjour,
Cela a dû se passer quand j'ai changé le nom de l'enseigne sur StreetComplete, je n'ai donc pas effectué de modifications sur pc. Une amie m'a suggéré que cela est automatique lorsque les modifications sont faites sur StreetComplete, ça serait possible j'imagine ?
woodpeck (2026-04-30 15:30:21+00:00): Hello PGL0, in this changeset you have deleted a number of buildings only to re-add them with a slight offset. This is not wrong but we prefer if existing objects are moved/corrected to reflect reality, rather than deleting and recreating them, because the former retains the object history.
PGL0 (2026-04-30 15:52:48+00:00): that makes sense, apologies.  is there an established practice for correcting / modifying repetitive objects in large quantity?  in this case, the buildings and walls in question are identical in design and copy/pasting seemed more consistent and efficient compared to manually moving points on each building, destructive though it is.
woodpeck (2026-05-01 19:08:16+00:00): The "JOSM" editor will allow you to select a number of objects and move them, or even align a large number of rectangles along a common direction. Through a plugin, you can also use the "replace geometry" function which will replace the old object's geometry with one newly drawn: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/utilsplugin2#Replace_geometry_(Ctrl+Shift+G) Having said that, the JOSM editor does have a bit of a learning curve when you first start using it.
eggie (2026-04-30 19:22:42+00:00): Dat is de juiste tag inderdaad.
Gr eggie
felipeeugenio (2026-04-30 19:09:03+00:00): Hola. por favor no usar nombres genéricos o descriptivos. Si no tienen nombre, no agregarlo.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182037987
felipeeugenio (2026-04-30 19:10:21+00:00): Además, no toda área verde es una plaza. Esa entrada es mas lo que llamamos en OSM un landuse=grass. Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182037987