piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
benoitdd (2023-12-21 09:59:30+00:00): super, merci!

du coup pour éviter les avertissements, il faudrait aussi faire la correction sur les route_masters (ex https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3328805 pour cette ligne)
OpenStreetBuilder (2023-12-22 23:26:23+00:00): Hello,

Je viens de pousser toutes les modifs sur les routes master.

A voir si les avertissements disparaitrons avec la prochaine exécution de subway processor
mat (2025-02-05 07:37:55+00:00): Suite au changement de sens de circulation de la rue Léo Lagrange, qu'en est-il de ce bout de la rue des Prés ? Est-elle toujours à double sens ? Il semblerait plus logique qu'elle soit devenue à sens unique aussi.
Pascal_Hil (2025-02-05 07:49:04+00:00): Il était prévu que la rue des près change de sens, mais ce n'est pas le cas actuellement. Quant au "bout de la rue des près" (je suppose côté rue ste croix ?), il n'est pas officiellement en sens unique, mais l'est "de facto" !
Pascal_Hil (2025-02-05 07:52:41+00:00): Au fait, est-il possible de préciser une rue "interdite sauf riverains" ?
mat (2025-02-05 08:50:14+00:00): Interdite sauf riverains se traduit par un access=private.
Sébastien Pi (2025-12-25 12:11:58+00:00): Par contre, interdit sauf riverain, c’est « destination », pas « private » : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:motor_vehicle%3Ddestination

« de facto » et « pas officiellement » traduit bien que la circulation est autorisée dans les deux sens pour tout le monde. Juste que dans les faits, c’est utile pour les riverains. Les routeurs connaissent les sens de circulation et vont éviter le secteur sans aucun intervention => pas d’access à paramétrer ici (car aucun panneau ne l’interdit).
Supaplex (2023-12-21 01:59:30+00:00): 先前 Jiachen 畫得好粗糙，標 landuse=residential 可能都好點
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145325852
anpk (2023-12-20 12:43:56+00:00): Здравствуйте. В данной правке примыкание улицы Пожарных и спасателей в районе дома Мельникайте, 10 отмечено не так как в соответствии с действительностью. Предыдущий вариант был ближе к тому что там есть.
pesec (2023-12-21 04:26:48+00:00): Доброо дня.
Я ориентировался на Яндекс.фото в расположении перекрестка:
https://yandex.ru/maps/55/tyumen/?l=mrc&ll=65.598370%2C57.165971&mrc%5Bid%5D=1168808842&mrc%5BsegmentIndex%5D=63&z=18.85
Если где-то ошибся, поправьте.
anpk (2023-12-21 06:28:13+00:00): Добрый день. Исправил дорогу так как она там на самом деле практически прямая. Ну и вместо выезда с парковки сделали остановку.
Dawid2849 (2023-12-20 20:35:25+00:00): Skoro remont się skończył to oneway chyba powinno zniknąć?
Sebastian | Yanosik (2023-12-21 10:37:45+00:00): Racja, moje przeoczenie. Dzięki za czujność ;)
Pozdrawiam!
gileri (2023-12-22 21:57:55+00:00): Thanks !
Jrachi (2024-10-18 11:31:58+00:00): Ciao.
Il tag cai_scale si dovrebbe applicare solo sulle relazioni.
Sui sentieri è più corretto usare sac_scale
Ne convieni?
granpasso811 (2024-10-19 09:34:14+00:00): Ciao, corretto.
arcanma (2023-12-21 11:45:24+00:00): Un oggetto con solo il nome, che tra l'altro non dice nulla, non ha nessuna utilità. Che cosa dovrebbe rappresentare quel punto?
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-14 19:32:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147464049, 147464044, 147464035, 147464024 where the changeset comment is: revert von Edits, die auf noch nicht für OSM freigegebenen Daten der Landesvermessung RLP beruhen
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-22 13:35:46+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11434741586/history has leaf_type = nr that was added in this edit
What this tag means? This leaf_type= value is unusual
OttoR (2026-05-22 14:44:10+00:00): Needs to be broadleaved. Probally typo.

No means currently to correct.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-24 05:43:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183092107 fixed it

thanks for a reply!
OttoR (2026-05-25 08:25:27+00:00): Thanks!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-20 11:40:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8091952876
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8091952935
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232655264
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232655269

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232655261

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232655262

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
udarnyk (2023-12-20 17:55:41+00:00): Ласточка, блядь??!!
damianeue (2023-12-20 11:49:55+00:00): offsets used:
north of node 203405653: -2.46; 0.30
south of node 203405653: -2.09; -0.89
Matija Nalis (2026-01-28 01:10:32+00:00): There seems to be no Plodine supermarket at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11434741148/history/1 - please check your datasets. (See https://www.plodine.hr/supermarketi)

Also, please discuss any imports / automated edits in Croatia at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/hr/72 before you make them. 

Thanks!
Evgeniya_rocketdata (2026-01-28 07:11:10+00:00): Hello! 

Before publishing on the map, we check all locations against the website and the site points to this location https://www.plodine.hr/supermarketi/93/supermarket-zagreb-family-fun-amphome-mall. 
We will contact the brand representatives to clarify the information. You may be right, and in this case, the website is indeed displaying incorrect information. 

We would be happy to be part of the Croatian community and coordinate imports. 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/importing-data-from-company-owners-using-the-rocketdata-service/141087

Thank you for pointing this out! Best regards.
WarlockMain (2023-12-20 11:58:12+00:00): .
TrickyFoxy (2024-08-14 04:53:54+00:00): 👋

You are using the site=www.poi86.com tag. I suspect you wanted to indicate the website from which you took the information. Do you agree that this should be fixed at source=www.poi86.com?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232661668

By the way, the id key is not very good, since it is not clear what kind of id it is. Try to come up with a more understandable key.
kapazao (2024-01-21 18:12:00+00:00): Hola, ¿puedes explicar de dónde sacas la información para ampliar la A-316 hasta la rotonda que da a la J-12?
Revisé esta carretera hace poco (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16542797) y no parece que fuese hasta ahí.
Un saludo
manu_romero_411 (2024-01-21 18:27:45+00:00): Probablemente fuera un error por mi parte. Efectivamente el tramo de A-316 hacia el norte empieza en el cruce con Camino de la Noria, y acaba hacia el sur junto al ramal que proviene del parque empresarial, hotel, N-323 y A-44. Soy del lugar (paso por ese tramo a diario) y efectivamente la cartelería que delimita la competencia de la carretera (entre la Junta de Andalucía y el Ayuntamiento de Jaén) está justo en a la altura del cruce con Camino de la Noria (en ambos sentidos). Lo más exacto sería ampliar el tramo de A-316 norte->sur hasta ese punto.

Por otro lado, aunque J-12 está ahí, no existe en ningún punto señalética referente a ese nombre, en el pasado solamente se hacía referencia a J-12 en diversos callejeros de Jaén como las Páginas Amarillas; antes de la construcción del tranvía ese tramo hasta la altura del campus de la Universidad de Jaén se identificaba como N-323 y no como J-12. Desconozco qué identificación oficial le da el Ayuntamiento de Jaén en la actualidad.

Gracias por revisarlo. Saludos.
aTarom (2023-12-20 18:46:21+00:00): Hola, por qué cambiar amenity=hospital a area=yes?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37038432/history

Según la wiki estaba bien antes no?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=hospital?uselang=en
Robert Whittaker (2023-12-22 18:02:18+00:00): Could you check on the AED you added at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11434856969 ?

The location description says "newbold revel reception", but that location would seem to fit this node instead: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11434847270 .

Also, there's already an AED mapped nearby in this village at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/321766503 . Is there actually another one at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11434856969 ?
Benoît C MdP (2024-01-09 08:05:23+00:00): Bonjour Finsh,

J'y suis passé hier et la bande cyclable existe toujours même si elle est partiellement effacée/peu visible. Pour info, la signalisation verticale n'est pas obligatoire.

Bonne continuation

Benoît
tekim (2024-03-05 01:12:25+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM).  We are not allowed to use Google Street View when editing OSM.
osmviborg (2023-12-20 13:09:28+00:00): Hvis din 'note' er tiltænkt evt. brugere, skal den ændres til 'description=*' noter er til kortlæggere.
woodpeck_repair (2023-12-20 13:00:30+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 145315982, 145315990, 145315999, 145316005.
tastrax (2023-12-20 21:53:03+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
NeisBot (2023-12-29 11:07:09+00:00): Hello, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
flohoff (2023-12-22 09:55:30+00:00): Moin,
du hast hier auf einem Gebäude das "building=yes" gelöscht. Deshalb wird das jetzt in der Karte auch nicht mehr gezeigt.

Exsitiert das Gebäude nicht mehr? Dann wären die Lifecycle prefixe also sowas wie "demolished:building=yes" oder "razed:building=yes" richtiger.

So ist jetzt eine Linie mit einer Addresse in der Karte das aber keine attribute beinhaltet was das genau ist.

Flo
flohoff (2023-12-22 09:56:53+00:00): 
Ach ja - Und eins der Carports hat jetzt eine unvollständige Addresse. Da ist nur ein "addr:street" getagged. Das wird jetzt dazu führen das das in anderen Validatoren als Fehlerhafte addresse auftaucht weil die ja nicht vollständig ist. Also Hausnummer, PLZ, Ort etc fehlen da.

Ich denke das Carport hat keine Eigene Addresse - dann sollte da auch kein addr:street drauf sein.

Flo
silversurfer83 (2023-12-20 17:26:42+00:00): Hi abester :)

please do not edit places across the continent in one go. It makes it hard to check your work.

What do I mean: First, work on places in Maine, upload/save the changes, then move over to Oregon.

Also: This change set comment still doesn't help. What "ai" are you talking about. Please write about what you changed and where you got the information you're adding. Thanks.
Supaplex (2023-12-20 14:39:36+00:00): 那些地址是有分室的狀況，應該存在但位置沒再細分
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145331687
CADdog63 (2024-02-26 12:00:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145159943#map=19/51.35824/12.30767

dein Ernst ?
PeterPan0815 (2024-02-28 16:16:19+00:00): ?
Jordi MF (2023-12-20 17:56:56+00:00): Hola Maria,

He remapejat les zones que has afegit com a mitjanes de la carretera i les àrees per a calmar el trànsit. Les zones que separen els carrils per a vehicles, els he mapejat com a area:highway=traffic_island (tal com s'indica ací: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Atraffic_calming%3Disland). Per altra banda, la bardissa que està situada enmig, crec que és millor mapejar-la com una línia recta de bardissa (barrier=hedge) tal com s'indica ací: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dhedge. Crec que és un poc més acurat que utilitzar l'etiqueta de zona enjardinada (que podria confondre's en una zona visitable per als vianants). En canvi, per a la zona enjardinada de la rotonda, encara que no siga per ús de vianants, no conec una etiqueta millor i jo també ho haguera mapejat com ho has fet tu.

Salutacions,
Jordi
MariaDCC (2023-12-21 06:25:24+00:00): Hola, em sembla perfecte. Vaig estar mirant com etiquetar eixes medianeres i "isletes" però no vaig trobar res que encaixara, per això vaig pensar que a una mala les ficava com a jardí i després ja voriem, així que genial. Moltes gràcies....

Per cert, ja que estem. En la desembocadura del Millars, hi ha un espigó natural que s'ha recrescut en paral·lel a la linea de costes, però no sé si reflexar-ho o no, ja que com sobrepasa la linea de costes queda raro .. Pega una mirada a vore que et sembla....Si es pot fer alguna cosa.
Jordi MF (2023-12-25 14:52:31+00:00): Hola Maria,

Perdona que no haja respost abans. He preguntat a la comunitat d'usuaris d'OSM i m'han dit que sí que es pot editar si eixa restinga ja s'ha estabilitzat. També diuen que pots preguntar a l'Ajuntament per si de cas tenen alguna informació addicional... Tenint en compte que el coneixes bé, crec que tampoc no cal que preguntes res. Edita-ho amb la imatge PNOA.
MariaDCC (2023-12-28 06:48:30+00:00): ok, de totes maneres pegaré una mirada en el visor de l'ICV i del IGN a vore quan de temps porta eixa restinga aixina. Gràcies i bona entrada en l'any nou.
tux67 (2023-12-20 14:32:00+00:00): Hi Rockedf,
what is the source of this added POI? 
I do not think that this is based on local OTG investigation, right?
BR
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145332901
Rockedf (2023-12-20 14:39:57+00:00): Hello friend, I am a volunteer at btcmap and indeed the source comes from the owner of the site.

 I will tell you the source and if you wish I can forward you the emails sent to me by the owner.

I always check before adding places to the map, don't worry. 

https://github.com/teambtcmap/btcmap-data/issues/5875
tux67 (2023-12-20 14:51:53+00:00): In this case  (or better in general) it would make sense to name the source of your knowledge to avoid additional effort for mappers doing QC in their region. That would be in line with:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Verifiability
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Good_changeset_comments

So I hope the source you named is in line with OSMs License to avoid any legal issues.

Depending on the local situation, there is now an inconsistency with the other existing POIs in the same building. e.g. is this tiler a replacement of the "Olympia Grill" restaurant?  Might be worth adding a fixme tag (I will do that)

Thanks & BR
tux67
Rockedf (2023-12-20 14:54:58+00:00): Thank you for the explanation. Regards
gscholz (2023-12-21 08:38:45+00:00): Hi maicolgalante,
your recent edits have created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=12.88389&lat=46.30546&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145333260

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
AndersAndersson (2023-12-20 20:03:38+00:00): Hej och välkommen till OSM!
Vad är det som gör att du ändrar denna väg till en serviceväg?
En "skogsväg" av detta slag brukar oftast taggas som "unclassified" i OSM.
MaserFrakt Mats (2023-12-21 08:02:07+00:00): Hej!
Tackar. 
Det är en " skogsväg " som bl.a. leder till våran täkt. 
Vi följer upp hastighetsefterlevnad på bl.a. denna sträcka och den säger fel hastighet enl. vårat verktyg.
Beskrivningen för service kändes passande här då den leder till en industriell verksamhet. Den tidigare vägklassningen generar också fel hastighetsklassning på vägsträckan.
AndersAndersson (2023-12-21 15:51:25+00:00): Jag har nu lagt in 70 km/h som hastighetsbegränsning.
Jag är dock osäker på om service är rätt. Vägen fortsätter väl förbi täkten upp till Bergkarlås?
Frans S (2023-12-21 11:48:42+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, You did not square all buildings!

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145334560
redd (2024-12-08 11:08:26+00:00): Hallo socksinspace,
vielen Dank für deine Mühen, aber Öffnungszeiten sind nicht ganz so einfach in OpenStreetMap.

Verwendet werden englische Kurzbegriffe, also statt Mo, Di, Mi, Do, Fr, Sa, So sollte Mo, Tu, We, Th, Fr, Sa, Su verwendet werden.

Gib es das Trödelcafe noch? Ich habe dazu leider keine Website oder ähnliches gefunden? Und ist es wirklich ein Second-Hand-Laden und kein Cafe?

Grüße und viel Erfolg, 

redd
Frans S (2023-12-21 11:34:40+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, ( on other changesets as well, not all buildings are squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145334795
JayTurnr (2023-12-20 20:58:57+00:00): Hi, sorry! Been very busy with work and life. Does this revert everything about those edits, or just the office/shop tags? 

I found some places that were wrongly tagged as estate agents that where hairdressers or cafes etc
JayTurnr (2023-12-20 21:09:11+00:00): I've done my best to remap the misc fixes I made, but left the shop tag intact. I discussion still needs to be had, but more so in the form of a tagging proposal. Life is busy though so unlikely to happen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145346083
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145346332
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145346291
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145346259
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145346209
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145346164
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145346145
SomeoneElse (2023-12-20 21:16:04+00:00): The changeset selection was "user_id = '5008136' and tags -> 'comment' like 'shop=estate_agent -> office=estate_agent #maproulette%';" - sorry if any other changes got caught up.  I did notice https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327309216/history which I guess might be an estate agent rather than just a property company office (and you're more likely to know than me).
JayTurnr (2023-12-21 08:25:33+00:00): I'm not too sure if that's an office or a shop, but I noticed the entrance node had the shop tag, no name, but the building way had the name, so I moved over the shop tag. The building was marked as an office so I also added the office tag.

Once again, apologies for the inconvenience! Merry Christmas (or other holiday!)
Kerploonk (2023-12-20 14:55:23+00:00): Source: https://straeto.is/skipuleggja-ferd/timatoflur/landsbyggdin
JeroenHoek (2023-12-20 17:28:59+00:00): Wat klopte daar volgens maproulette niet aan?
Peter Elderson (2023-12-20 17:44:45+00:00): Ze (tomtom) hebben een challenge gemaakt die gevallen moet opsporen van oprijbaan en exitbaan die aan 1 node van de rotonde vastzit. Ik mocht ff testen. Deze had twee exits vanaf 1 node, wat niet fout is, dus die moet uit de challenge gehaald worden. Maar ik vond het beter in overeenstemming met de situatie op de grond om toch aparte nodes te gebruiken. Voor die serviceway ga je namelijk eerder rechtsaf over een traffic island heen, daarna komt pas de afslag Harlingersingel.
JeroenHoek (2023-12-20 18:04:56+00:00): Ja, maar de ways komen toevallig op dezelfde node uit als ze netjes uitgelijnd zijn. Dat is prima toch?

Waarom zouden twee wegen niet op dezelfde node op de rotonde mogen uitkomen?
JeroenHoek (2023-12-20 18:06:42+00:00): Oh wacht, de wiki noemt dat inderdaad. In dat geval is een segment er tussen prima, maar hij is nu wel raar uitgelijnd; alsof het enkel een uitgang van de rotonde is.
JeroenHoek (2023-12-20 18:08:26+00:00): (Aangepast.)
Peter Elderson (2023-12-20 21:10:42+00:00): :thumbsup:
i2004 (2023-12-20 16:22:41+00:00): te agrege prada de quinqquela y pedro de mendoza
Hufkratzer (2023-12-20 19:53:39+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232699155 looks like a riding arena and not like a riding centre. In OSM riding arenas are usually tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian and iD has a preset that does that witch French name "Terrain d'equitation". Compare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
Chris Fleming (2023-12-22 18:25:29+00:00): Thanks Dean, great to know that there is someone local keeping an eye on things.
Frans S (2024-01-03 10:14:07+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings mapped very oversized now and then.
Buildings not squared.
Connected nodes of buildings to each other.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145335797
BubbaJuice (2023-12-20 15:23:48+00:00): source=also some APS docs I found online that had substation names
gscholz (2023-12-21 08:38:54+00:00): Hi maicolgalante,
your recent edits have created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=12.88389&lat=46.30546&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145336340

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido