piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Dídac Forner Mateo (2024-10-07 10:29:37+00:00): Hola aTarom. Gràcies. Sí, l'havia mogut per accident, al igual que la ubicació del coll.
aTarom (2024-10-07 15:22:21+00:00): gràcies a tu per contestar i per corregir-ho, perfecte, així es un plaer col·laborar!!!
Filip009 (2024-10-06 19:59:27+00:00): Zdravím, pri pridávaním budov ich prosím nezabudni zahranatiť. Vyzerá to potom lepšie. Robí sa to pravým klikom na budovu a tam je možnosť zahranatiť. Alebo klávesová skratka Q.
Herwescheluc (2024-10-07 09:51:37+00:00): Hallo, FW-Mittenaar und wilkommen bei OSM!

Deine Bemühungen um die Erfassung von Hydranten sind sehr gern gesehen, leider kam es dabei aber zu einem Problem.

Wie Du hier sehen kannst (https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=14&lat=50.67854&lon=8.30476&item=xxxx&level=1%2C2%2C3&loc=16/50.690395/8.384875), hast Du beim Mappen einen Punkt versehentlich "mitgenommen", das hat die Straßen durcheinander gebracht. Aber keine Sorge, das läßt sich in diesem Fall leicht beheben: Du siehst in OSMOSE den roten Kreis an der grünen Albert-Schweitzer-Straße? Geh in iD an das rechts liegende Ende der Straße und führe den Punkt einfach wieder zurück, dahin, wo der rote Kreis ist. Das passiert beim Mappen recht schnell und kann für viel Verwirrung sorgen. Daher bitte beim Mappen extrem aufpassen, iD ist bekannt für solche "Ausrutscher". Mir ist das auch schon vorgekommen, nicht immer habe ich das ohne Hilfe schaffen können.

Aber auch bei den Hydranten selbst möchte ich Dich um Prüfung bitten: Du verwendest "ref= 100" und ich denke Du meinst eigentlich den Durchmesser, also "fire_hydrant:diameter=". Lies doch bitte im wiki, wie Du das anwenden kannst: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:emergency=fire%20hydrant?uselang=de. Unter https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=157556255 kannst Du Deine Einträge gut überblicken und evtl. Fehler erkennen. Dafür (so hab ich's gemacht) einfach den Link abspeichern und bei Bedarf aufrufen, dann die letzten Zahlen in der Adressleiste einfach mit der Nummer Deines (oder auch jedes anderen) Änderungssatzes ersetzen.

Gute Hilfe bietet auch immer wieder das Forum (https://community.openstreetmap.org/), wo Du rasch Antworten auf Deine Fragen erhalten kannst.

Gerne stehe ich für Rückfragen zu Verfügung!

Grüße aus Herborn
Andreas
philippec (2024-10-06 20:16:17+00:00): Dus ook de AED is van plaats veranderd ?  Dan zouden ook de foto's  moeten veranderen.
Michiel van der Wulp (2024-10-07 04:58:06+00:00): Ik zou de plaats van de AED moeten nakijken - maar hij lijkt me niet midden op de weg te hangen. Hangt die niet dicht bij het kantoortje van de parking?
philippec (2024-10-07 09:22:35+00:00): Ik ben er nooit geweest.
Zijn de foto's niet voldoende ?
U hebt de AED verplaatst.
Michiel van der Wulp (2024-10-07 11:34:29+00:00): Welke foto's?
philippec (2024-10-07 12:19:15+00:00): https://imgur.cohttps://imgur.com/unknown-area-A6agx4qm/unknown-area-A6agx4q
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.196412491402&lng=3.2212185722936&z=18.2842056379295&pKey=1351558958577428&focus=photo

die staan als tag values bij de emergency=defibrillator

Map Layers - Map Data
philippec (2024-10-07 12:33:55+00:00): Ik zie nu dat u met JOSM werkt, dat is te moeilijk voor mij.
whb (2024-10-14 19:29:05+00:00): Hallo wegavision,

zumindest PKW passen da eher nicht durch, oder?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25165438

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1655652958331591&focus=photo&x=0.65&y=0.48

Viele Grüße
whb
wegavision (2024-10-14 20:13:48+00:00): Richtig, da ist ein Poller, habe ihn gesetzt, danke.
eggie (2024-10-06 20:05:01+00:00): adres hersteld
NeisBot (2024-10-06 21:14:38+00:00): Hi whb_revert, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features!?

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=157556433
SomeoneElse (2024-10-06 22:43:06+00:00): :)

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/error-document-not-well-formed-while-trying-to-upload-osm-file-into-osm-server-via-https-api-openstreetmap-org-api-0-6-changeset-2345678-upload/119764/3
NeisBot (2024-10-06 21:14:38+00:00): Hi whb_revert, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features!?

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=157556475
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-07 10:16:02+00:00): Same, please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/error-document-not-well-formed-while-trying-to-upload-osm-file-into-osm-server-via-https-api-openstreetmap-org-api-0-6-changeset-2345678-upload/119764/3
NeisBot (2024-10-06 21:14:38+00:00): Hi whb_revert, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features!?

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=157556612
SomeoneElse (2024-10-07 10:09:52+00:00): See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/error-document-not-well-formed-while-trying-to-upload-osm-file-into-osm-server-via-https-api-openstreetmap-org-api-0-6-changeset-2345678-upload/119764/3
totera (2024-10-06 21:16:06+00:00): Avresti "aggiornato" la Ciclovia Adriatica su quali basi? Nei tratti da te aggiunti a Senigallia, Marzocca, Marina di Montemarciano al momento non c'è nessuna indicazione del passaggio della ciclovia (a Senigallia tra l'altro l'uscita dal centro della ciclovia Adriatica verso nord non è nemmeno previsto sul lungomare, ma sarà un percorso più interno)
lorenzo23622 (2024-10-06 21:28:00+00:00): Sto aggiungendo tutto il percorso come segnato sul sito di bicitalia: https://www.bicitalia.org/it/bicitalia/gli-itinerari-bicitalia/131-bi6-ciclovia-adriatica#close
totera (2024-10-06 21:31:51+00:00): Quel percorso segnalato sul sito non è evidentemente stato completato, e anzi in alcuni tratti la realizzazione della ciclovia Adriatica ha seguito un percorso diverso. Per favore non mappare posti che non conosci
totera (2024-10-06 21:53:26+00:00): L'utente ha modificato il tracciato della ciclovia Adriatica senza tenere conto dello stato reale dei luoghi, copiando da un progetto non del tutto realizzato o realizzato diversamente (vedi https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157556615)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157558885
woodpeck_repair (2024-11-13 21:05:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159107632 where the changeset comment is: revert un-trustworthy/fictional golf mapping
cdavila (2025-08-25 13:25:37+00:00): Could you please check Regenkuppe peak (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12230350370) altitude? 5552 m seems far too much...
siby47 (2025-08-25 13:40:55+00:00): It was a typo, altitude is 552 m according to topographic map 2716CD. I corrected it.
Sorry, and thank you very much.
cdavila (2025-08-25 14:03:46+00:00): You are welcome!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-06 20:31:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Polna;Liliowa;Magnoliowa;Kolejowa;Zajączkowo":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4473390916

"Chabrowa;Polna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4473391511

"Chabrowa;Polna;Kolejowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4473394200

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-08-04 22:34:29+00:00): +
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Barroszt (2024-10-07 13:25:18+00:00): Lokalnego też, bardziej dojazdowa.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:10:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Andrea Del Sarto (2024-10-09 14:21:42+00:00): Ciao wildmichael,
perchè hai eliminato il tag source dalle relazioni dei percorsi escursionistici appartenenti la RET?
wildmaps (2024-10-09 15:01:30+00:00): Ciao, mi dispiace che ho comesso un errore.
Potresti indicare quale sentiero sarebbe quello? Provo a ripristinarlo.
Andrea Del Sarto (2024-10-09 15:05:10+00:00): ciao, a giudicare dal changeset è meglio fare un revert, perchè i percorsi interessati sono più di 100
MarcoR (2024-10-09 23:08:06+00:00): Ciao wildmichael,
questo changeset ha rimosso i tag source et simili (source:ref, source:maxspeed, etc.) da poco meno di 4000 oggetti OSM (ad esempio https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/271945) penso senza controllare che il source fosse dichiarato nel changeset che ha aggiunto o modificato gli oggetti in questione (a proposito, questo stesso changeset non ha un tag source che dichiari le fonti utilizzate per esempio per modificare i nomi delle strade, come https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078861104 che da Via dei Golfi è diventata Viale dei Golfi; è consigliabile inserire la fonte per aiutare i mappatori futuri a effettuare delle modifiche ai "tuoi" oggetti).

Sono contrario al revert completo, preferirei se possibile una soluzione di ricerca degli oggetti "amputati" per poi ripristinarli selettivamente.

Buon mapping,
Marco
wildmaps (2024-10-11 18:21:37+00:00): Ciao, mi dispiace per l'errore che ho comesso ma ho sbagliato di controllare l'area prima del upload.

Qualcuno potrebbe aiutare a ripristinare i dati o faccio revert?

Un saluto
Michele
MarcoR (2024-10-11 19:12:43+00:00): Nelle prossime ore effettuo io un ripristino semi-automatico dei soli tag "source*" rimossi.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
tyfi (2024-10-06 20:51:26+00:00): Source is local knowledge
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
flohoff (2024-10-07 08:55:27+00:00): Moin,
wenn der nicht wiederkommt würde ich den löschen.

Aufpassen das die Addresse noch irgendwo ist. Ggfs nur alle tags des ladens von dem Node entfernen.

Flo
voschix (2024-10-13 21:45:23+00:00): This changeset contains important errors: it converted a non-public motorway service road into a public cycleway and it removed the construction tag / no-access tag fro two motorway service areas that are still under construction and closed off. 
In detail:
way/919739988 you wrongly removed the construction tag. This service area is closed and under construction (all buildings are missing)
way/919740813 idem
way/193370921 idem

way/919739989 you wrongly removed the access=no 
way/919739990 idem
way/919740811 idem
way/919740812 idem

way/1321693144 you inserted the road, but omitted to add access=no 
way/1321693145 idem
way/1321693146 idem
way/1321693147 idem
way/1321693148 idem

way/193370907 this is not a cycleway, but a motorway service road closed to the public. It is also fenced off (not reachable from the the normal road network).

way/193370910 why did you remove "flooded=yes" if the tunnel is actually full of water?
voschix (2024-10-26 15:01:03+00:00): Corrected the errors!
totera (2024-10-06 21:29:46+00:00): Ad Ancona hai aggiunto alla Ciclovia Adriatica tratti inventati di sana pianta e hai eliminato invece quelli segnalati lungo la vallata del Miano
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
totera (2024-10-06 21:53:27+00:00): L'utente ha modificato il tracciato della ciclovia Adriatica senza tenere conto dello stato reale dei luoghi, copiando da un progetto non del tutto realizzato o realizzato diversamente (vedi https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157556615)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157558885
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Leo Slager (2024-10-07 17:10:35+00:00): Hoi A67-A67,

Kun je hier even naar kijken.
Er is een node ongemerkt verplaatst.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4468961#map=15/52.21448/6.12164&layers=N
A67-A67 (2024-10-07 18:06:11+00:00): Bedankt. Ik heb het aangepast.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
mcliquid (2024-10-08 16:40:58+00:00): Ein paar unverbundene Wege und doppelte Nodes korrigiert.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:10:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
tyfi (2024-10-06 21:40:39+00:00): This coincided with the sidewalk upgrade along Jeffco Boulevard.
Exe19 (2024-10-14 16:19:56+00:00): Odcinek LK137 Katowice-Katowice Załęże był (i nadal jest) przejezdny w chwili wprowadzania przez Ciebie zmiany. Poprawiłem.
jhaluska80 (2024-10-06 23:20:16+00:00): Just FYI, when you're adding generic POIs, like parking, dumpsters, picnic tables, fire hydrants, etc.  Please omit the name tag.  See the wiki for more information for when to use it.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name

I have removed the name tag on a few of them for that reason.
anon38289 (2024-10-07 00:35:22+00:00): Ahh thanks for the heads up; I'm new to this, so I appreciate the instructions.

I'll be sure to do that in the future.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:10:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Frans S (2024-10-15 07:52:06+00:00): Hello, Thanks for mapping.
A remark.  You added a layer to a few buildings and a -1 layer to a highway.
Why ? The buildings are building on the ground and the highway is not a tunnel. Please solve the issues rather than add layers to hide them,
Best regards
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SekeRob (2024-10-07 07:18:39+00:00): Hi,

Interesting. So happened to have covered the way from Giulianova to Sangro up and down and noticed that the part going thru Pineto including a new cycleway with top notch paving, lit and 3.5 wide in Scerne has now been dual signed both as BI-6 and Ciclovie di Cerrano so adapted that part.

As I've commented on CS's that touch on the SS16 with 4200 members, the BI-6 with near 1600 and counting is due for a regional split and then combine into a super route. Done the Appenine Bike Tour route of 3100km in 44 parts in an SR and works a treat. Any change and just a BBox for that section at most, not one covering the whole of Italy, plus it loads quick, manageable.
One editor from France started removing vrs tags en mass along the BI-6 without discussion which DWG reverted. Think for now certain tags needs to remain on way parts due the messy and broken up parts a big 'WIP' ambient relating to this route.
Next up, a new section north of Ortona including using the old rail gallerie thru to Lido Riccio... lack of money is making the progress slow like much in poor Abruzzo. The Ortona to Sangro stretch has become beautiful cycleway, if windy sometimes with constant view of the Adriatic, the resorts and the 'trabucchi' of course for sea food eating.

cheers.
totera (2024-10-08 21:07:27+00:00): In Abruzzo is it really marked as "BI-6"? In Marche only "6" is used with an Italian flag (e.g.: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/aq6Jk9uuswo/maxresdefault.jpg).
SekeRob (2024-10-09 05:51:25+00:00): Seriously Lol.  So much for collaboration at nat level. At least the sign back colour is same. Can count the times cycling into Marche on 2 fingers and that's years ago. Supposedly a cycle/foot bridge is under construction across the Torrente Vibrata near Martinsecuro. The crossing on the SS16 is absolutely horrible there, not inviting to go into . The c/f bridge in San Benedetto and beyond. and v.v.
In Francavilla was supposed to open in 2022, then it became Pasqua 2024, We're nearing 2025 and they finally started on the way construction across, Some ugly steal construct. The huge concrete pylon towering over town not a visual asset.

Have a nice day
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Udarian (2024-10-06 22:19:08+00:00): ignore the warnings:ambiguous_crossing:crossing_conflict they are from ways that are tagged correctly and Rapid wants to add implied tags on crossings; they are not ambiguous. aka crossing=uncontrolled & unmarked imply crossing:signals=no and crossing=crossing=traffic_signals implies crossing:signals=yes so I am not adding duplicated information.