piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_1566574 (2024-03-29 11:16:15+00:00): Hello,
Sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1256139445/, note=fixme n'est pas valide, il vaut mieux utiliser fixme=* (où * décrit la nature du problème qui doit être corrigé)
Merci !
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-09 13:58:33+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. All looks good. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148065300
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-09 13:59:05+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. All looks good. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148065360
gscholz (2024-03-02 07:09:38+00:00): 

Hi MapeoAlmeria,
your recent edit have (again) left behind several errors regarding duplicate nodes:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-1.98994&lat=37.46082&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148065663

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Ewen Hill (2024-02-29 19:58:11+00:00): Hi and welcome to mapping. The area you have drawn is inconsistent with the actual building. Can you please go back in and update the map to make two buildings please?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148065894
gscholz (2024-03-02 07:09:02+00:00): Hi MapeoAlmeria,
your recent edit have (again) left behind several errors regarding duplicate nodes:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-1.98994&lat=37.46082&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148066237

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2024-03-06 07:15:33+00:00): Hi MapeoAlmeria, 
these errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
yelisey90 (2024-02-29 19:43:02+00:00): Hi dzove! Sorry, but I'll have to revert this. The path is perfectly walkable (I did it several times). The fact that it's steep and sometimes muddy doesn't make it a barrier instead of a path.
richlv (2024-03-01 10:41:05+00:00): Sveiki, paldies par kartes papildināšanu. Pievienoju https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft%3Delectronics_repair apzīmējumu un nedaudz nomainīju nosaukumu uz vienotu stilu.
StC (2024-03-12 13:30:35+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a interrompu la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre, je me suis chargé de la réparation (voir knooppuntnet.nl pour le suivi des interruptions)
arcturusss (2024-03-26 17:25:36+00:00): Please do not map roads without delimiter as dual carriageways. 
Reverted.
ObscureAngel (2024-03-04 14:47:23+00:00): Bonjour !
Certaines routes ont été renommées ave votre pseudonyme (ex : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33913934)
Pourrez-vous les corriger lors de votre prochain passage sur OSM ? :)
Merci beaucoup !
Dave Venables (2024-03-28 15:41:12+00:00): Markeaton Brook goes through the centre of Derby as a culvert. 
Don't know the exact route but is certainly passes under Sadlergate Bridge https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27014613 and I think under Victoria Street https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5039159 before joining the river Derwent near here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180320982  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180321012
Dave Venables (2024-03-28 15:52:06+00:00): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markeaton_Brook suggests This culvert takes the brook beneath the centre of Derby, where it flows under the Strand, Victoria and Albert Street, to an unseen confluence of the Bramble brook. It crosses beneath the Morledge, before it finally re-emerges from the culvert into the Mill Fleam at the Cockpit island, and then runs alongside the Bass recreation ground, until it reaches the River Derwent.[3][4]
I've seen pictures of the culvert during road works https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/news/derby-news/heated-debate-rages-over-idea-7416863 https://www.flickr.com/photos/comradethompski/albums/72157606912868417/
Dave Venables (2024-03-28 15:58:00+00:00): Probably Bold Lane https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8102379
Sadlergate Bridge https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27014613
The Strand https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237163684
Victoria Street https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/704523720
Albert Street https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8102480
The route added in February https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1256155771 is too far North and is much too visible on the standard OpenStreetMap when nothing can be seen on the ground
Dave Venables (2024-03-29 09:21:13+00:00): There is an outflow on water into the river Derwent in the riverside gardens https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107391475 between these steps https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180321012 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180320982 route possibly from Albert Street under the council house car park https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/962494720
The Wikipedia article mentions another outflow into the Mill Fleam https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29291874 near the Mill Fleam pumping station https://waterprojectsonline.com/case-studies/mill-fleam-ps-2023/
Only the entrance near Ford Street https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278713958 and the exits in the Riverside gardens and Mill Fleam obvious on the ground although the name "Sadlergate Bridge" clearly indicates that the brook flows under here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278713958
Dave Venables (2024-03-29 09:41:16+00:00): Correct link to Sadlergate Bridge https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27014613 (accidently repeated the Ford Street one in the last comment)
Also added the Mill Fleam pumping station https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149302426 and a note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4172607
Dave Venables (2024-03-31 10:03:29+00:00): OpenStreetMap now largely matches https://waterwaymap.org/#map=14.67/52.92294/-1.47443&len=10..inf&tiles=planet-waterway-water https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1256155771 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1267369302

As well as Sadlergate Bridge https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27014613 the brook goes under Saint James’ Bridge https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11771064345 Saint Peter’s Bridge https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11771064351 and Tennant (Street) Bridge https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11773245451 https://her.derbyshire.gov.uk/Monument/MDR11504 none of which are visible from above ground today

Outflow of Markeaton Brook to the Derwent in the Riverside Gardens has been blocked off with the flow diverted to Mill Fleam https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29291874

Need further research to find the route near here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/179863424 to trace other underground flows https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4174133 and to further improve the alignment
pboscherini (2024-03-06 16:47:32+00:00): Good afternoon '6 giorni fa da Cebderby' and 'ivanbranco 3 giorni fa'.

I have seen the OSM full document of Tamigi river on the weburl https://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/2263653.

1) A system or a person want to follow the Thames river
2) A system or a person have the Thames river map, only
3) A system or a person don't want to damage its ship with a missing height information of a celing (eg. a bridge)
4) A system or a person don't know that there is a bridge (very important celing constraint) at latitude 51.5087227 and longitude -0.1168938 (node n7992814756)

I think that when we built a bridge we built a complex shadow section on the waterway.

Please explain and list how many "revert" action are done on the weburl https://www.openstreetmap.org for all the users.
Regards.
Piergiorgio.
pboscherini (2024-03-06 16:47:54+00:00): Good afternoon '6 giorni fa da Cebderby' and 'ivanbranco 3 giorni fa'.

I have seen the OSM full document of Tamigi river on the weburl https://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/2263653.

1) A system or a person want to follow the Thames river
2) A system or a person have the Thames river map, only
3) A system or a person don't want to damage its ship with a missing height information of a celing (eg. a bridge)
4) A system or a person don't know that there is a bridge (very important celing constraint) at latitude 51.5087227 and longitude -0.1168938 (node n7992814756)

I think that when we built a bridge we built a complex shadow section on the waterway.

Please explain and list how many "revert" action are done on the weburl https://www.openstreetmap.org for all the users.
Regards.
Piergiorgio.
Cebderby (2024-03-06 21:17:10+00:00): AI output will not be replied to.  If you have something coherent you want to say, write it yourself.  Italian is fine, we can translate it.
All'output dell'AI non verrà data risposta. Se hai qualcosa di coerente che vuoi dire, scrivilo tu stesso. L'italiano va bene, possiamo tradurlo.
Cebderby
pboscherini (2024-03-07 11:00:04+00:00): Morning,

does "Cebderby circa 14 ore fa" know "AI output" applied to "Changeset: "?
GREAT GREAT work.
"AI output" is also welcome on ".or*" web domain ...

Please explain plan your point of view.
Then, please, explain the italian for "coherent " (into the Cebderby experience).

Thanks in advance for your work.
Regards.
Piergiorgio.
Igor Bubelov (2024-03-01 04:07:01+00:00): Hi!

Just for your information: the correct date format is YYYY-MM-DD, so it needs to be 2024-02-09, not 29-02-2024. I already fixed it, thanks for adding your cafe to OSM!
JAAS (2024-04-03 16:40:03+00:00): Hello NicaTopo,

Here (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=738693066824230)  is yet another road sign which carries the alpha-numeric `ref=NIC-21`. Why are you removing the alphabetic portion of it (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095251990). At least on this portion you still left the actual road name and have not duplicated the ref as the name used. Is there a valid reason for changing the ref's?

Regards,
JAAS
empty_child (2024-03-03 21:31:13+00:00): Алексей, добрый день
В случае если amenity перешло в состояние disused, надо оригинальный amenity=* удалить и оставить только disused:amenity=*
bxl-forever (2024-02-29 20:19:57+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for spotting some obvious mistakes like this.  However, please note that in Belgium we trace buildings on *numerical* imagery and never on aerial pictures, which I see you used as backgrounds.  So, if you fix things like a node outlyer, please do not move buildings by following aerial pictures, because that means undoing some of the work we have been patiently doing in the last years.  (And there is still so much to do…)

There are 3 parts of the Belgium.  Depending on the part of the country, the background layer to select to get the correct outline of buildings is:

* Flanders (northern half): "Digitaal Vlaanderen GRB"

* Brussels (middle): "UrbisAdm FR/NL"

* Wallonie (southern half): "SPW(allonie) PICC numerical imagery"

Thanks in advance.
v_martyanov (2024-03-01 14:13:46+00:00): Oh, sorry! Didn't know!
v_martyanov (2024-03-01 14:56:22+00:00): I reverted the change and checked, seems I didn't move anything
bxl-forever (2024-03-01 15:44:20+00:00): I fixed other edits, especially in Brussels, where some outlines were moved.  Maybe not this one in particular—I left a comment on the most recent changeset at the time of writing.
Have a nice day.
v_martyanov (2024-03-20 23:13:46+00:00): Could you please specify the maximum "distortinon" of the building shape in meters I've made?
bxl-forever (2024-03-21 13:22:38+00:00): Hello,

Some parts of the building have a roof extension which does not match the real outline on the ground.  For those cases, I measured a difference of slightly more than 7.5 meters.
Indeed, we are lucky to be allowed to trace directly from government numerical data which has been licenced to use on OSM.

The picture below shows the difference between the official shape (pink) and how it was traced on aerial pictures (red outline).
https://multimob.be/uploads/urbis_err-8554636.png

Have a nice day.
v_martyanov (2024-03-21 13:38:07+00:00): Seems you're talking about some other changeset. During my edit I just deleted 4 nodes from the way and it is clearly visible from the changeset

Could you please gave a look at my changes https://osmcha.org/changesets/148069462 and your changes https://osmcha.org/changesets/148069883 of this building and show me where did you find 7.5 meters?
timmito (2024-02-29 20:54:46+00:00): Hallo sokolgeo, Danke für die Ergänzungen. Der Rettungspunkt HG-32 ist jetzt doppelt eingetragen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/836871272 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11678599114 Wie ist die Situation vor Ort?
eggie (2024-02-29 21:31:28+00:00): De duplikaat relaties heb ik verwijderd

Groet
eggie
v_martyanov (2024-03-20 23:23:05+00:00): And you successfully restored "too many nodes" I've deleted.
bxl-forever (2024-05-06 21:30:21+00:00): Hello,
You are right; this changeset was followed by another one a few days later where we took care of removing extra nodes, but while preserving the correct outline of those buildings.
Have a nice day.
limes11 (2024-03-01 06:57:40+00:00): Hallo

verstehe die Änderung nicht. 

Falls hier noch Baustelle ist, dann war hw=construction korrekt. Falls nicht, dann muss der construction-tag komplett weg.

VG
GuyFrom2007 (2024-03-01 13:17:01+00:00): Servus,

hier ist noch bis 2026 Baustelle. Ist dann wahrscheinlich korrekt.

Grüße
Soshal Distan Singh (2024-03-02 02:35:48+00:00): Добрый день. Не забывайте про пробелы в номерах домов. Пожалуйста, изучите: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Адреса#Нумерация_домов
VictorIE (2024-04-19 20:56:39+00:00): Hi,

How come Upper Glanmire Road is marked as a driveway?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422184333/history
mcliquid (2024-03-01 08:17:34+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
HellMap (2024-02-29 22:56:29+00:00): Sveiki,

Lūgums nemainīt Maximai `brand=Maxima` uz `Maxima X`. Brendā/zīmolā "X" nav, tas ir tikai veikalam - eksistē tikai viens Maximas veikalu tīkls. Redaktors pagaidām rāda nepareizi brīdinājumu, tas drīz būs izlabots.
eggie (2024-02-29 21:21:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Een waste_basket is een straatprullenbak... Wellicht voor allemaal recycling gebruiken.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-02-29 21:26:29+00:00): Kijk even hier
amenity=recycling

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling

MVG
eggie
GeorgeKaplan (2026-02-10 06:36:35+00:00): Bonjour, les voies que vous avez modifiées dans ce changeset sont-elles des pistes cucla les ou des voies vertes ? Votre modification en a fait un hybride incorrect.
Cédric H (2026-02-12 20:04:55+00:00): il s 'agit de voies vertes
BrummsLee (2024-03-29 14:59:46+00:00): Hallo Pascal!
Deine "Korrektur" ist hier nicht korrekt!
Vlt. hättest Du besser recherchieren sollen, bevor Du die Zugehörigkeit zu den Tarifverbünden änderst.
Es ist zwar korrekt, daß die Linie Hauptsächlich dem ZVON Netzwerk zugeordnet wird, sie gehört aber trotzdem auch zum VVO.
siehe Tarifgebiet VVO:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4217073
BrummsLee (2024-03-29 15:16:34+00:00): Ach, gerade gesehen... ist doch korrekt. Sorry. Dachte ich hätte den VVO nur als network:short drin gehabt.
Hab ich übersehen. Danke! ;o)
Päscl🛞🐱🛞💨 (2024-03-29 15:23:21+00:00): Hallo BrummsLee,
ja, die RB64 ist tatsächlich unsere Linie. Der VVO hat seinen Streckenabschnitt zwischen Hoyerswerda und Lohsa vor circa 23 Jahren abbestellt und seitdem bestellt der ZVON die komplette Linie. Ist auch der Grund, warum ZVON-Tageskarten in der VVO-Zone Hoyerswerda gültig sind und reine VVO-Fahrten zwischen Hoyerswerda und Lohsa mit der RB64 zum ZVON-Tarif stattfinden. :)
BrummsLee (2024-03-30 11:52:56+00:00): Hallo Pascal!
Danke für Deine Erläuterung.
Mir ging es darum, daß man vlt. kennzeichnet, daß die Linien zwei Verkehrsverbünde durchqueren. Das würde ja die Linien nach DD und Cottbus auch betreffen. Deswegen hatte ich wenigstens bei der Kurzbezeichnung beide Verbünde drin und habe den ZVON an erste Position gesetzt, da sie ja den größeren Anteil an den Strecken haben.
Mit Netzwerk ist ja sicher nicht gemeint, bei wem man die Fahrkarte kauft...?
Anonix35 (2024-05-06 11:18:27+00:00): Hello, I saw that you deleted all the Ski Route under the Larmstange. Why ?
Hedaja (2024-05-06 11:41:21+00:00): When I was there at the beginning of March the piste didn't exist anymore (no signs or other indications of it)
Is that something that only is open under really ideal conditions?
Anonix35 (2024-05-06 11:46:03+00:00): It's a bit considered Freeride.
I don't think they've ever been really marked out, but they exist. 
In any case they are still on the slopes map.
Hedaja (2024-05-06 13:40:02+00:00): I thought they had them marked with orange signs when I last rode them. I'll add it back in
d_berger (2024-03-01 06:53:12+00:00): Bitte beachte, dass bei Schweizer ÖV-Linien die korrekte Schweizer Schreibweise gilt – insbesondere bei Haltestellen in der Schweiz. Völlig egal, was da irgendwelche Validatoren in JOSM, iD oder anderen Tools vorschlagen. Bitte nicht wieder zurückändern. Danke.
tom_yorados (2024-03-01 15:13:48+00:00): Hi,
hast du schon zurückgeändert?
tom_yorados (2024-03-01 15:14:31+00:00): Danke für deine Gedult, die ganzen Datails gegenzuprüfen...
Grüße
d_berger (2024-03-02 10:33:46+00:00): Keine Sorge, ist längst korrigiert. Liebe Grüsse
czebureks (2026-01-02 23:44:05+00:00): Cześć! Niedawno jeden z użytkowników usunął ten obiekt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11678988625/history/1 - nie była to, jak sądzę, typowa kapliczka przydrożna? Czy mogłabyś go dodać ponownie z właściwymi tagami? Pozdrawiam
blackboxlogic (2024-03-01 16:55:04+00:00): Hi, you moved node 7158859146, probably by accident? Also, adding features to osm which no longer exist is a little weird, like way 1256331482 which seems to go through a house?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148072806
blackboxlogic (2024-03-03 01:55:16+00:00): Let me know if you need help putting that address back.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148072806
Xvtn (2024-03-04 16:03:36+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks good to me! One minor tip is that when using iD (the online osm.org editor) you can select a building or other shape and press "Q" to square up corners.
Thanks for your contributions!
user_5359 (2025-07-31 16:28:10+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/17290171. What ist the mean of tag oneway=C for this relation?
d3mol3k (2025-07-31 20:04:14+00:00): thanks for your attention - the tag crept in (I don't know how) but it has already been removed
tekim (2024-03-05 19:25:32+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM).  Thanks for your interest in the project.  However, for legal reasons, we are not allowed to use Google Earth when editing OSM.
NK Whitla (2024-02-29 22:33:46+00:00): review_requested=yes selected accidentally. Changeset does not need to be reviewed, it's just added building footprints from RapiD.
citrula (2024-03-01 05:36:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Thanks for your contribution!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148074065
evod (2025-02-24 14:32:45+00:00): Hi, unfortunately you removed oneway:bicycle=no from Lustkandlgasse. This is not correct, since contraflow cycling is allowed there! But don't worry, I just fixed it. Best regards!
MxxCon (2024-03-01 05:14:53+00:00): Hello.
Why did you remove covered=yes tag from some of these ways?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148074241
kguenther24 (2024-03-01 15:52:19+00:00): I changed them to covered=yes in an earlier edit but felt it was misleading since it's only partially covered and appears as a tunnel when rendered. I can change it back if a covered tag is valid here.
Seetroll (2024-03-09 10:05:02+00:00): Hallo NVBW_Seifert,
an dem neuen Fernbusbahnhof in KN hast du die Einträge unter der Brücke mit layer=-1 angelegt. Müßten diese nicht mit layer=1 und die Einträge auf der Brücke mit layer=2 gemappt sein? Ich bin mir nicht sicher, aber lt.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:layer und dem Beispiel dort verstehe ich das so.
Vielen Dank für eine Rückmeldung hierzu.
Grüße Seetroll
NVBW_Seifert (2024-03-09 10:20:45+00:00): Hallo Seetroll,

ich hätte einfach layer=0 nehmen können oder sollen, dann wäre im Bereich Busbahnhof alles ok.

Wenn Du nichts dagegen hast, korrigiere die die jetzigen layer = -1 Objekte
viele Grüße
Dietmar
NVBW_Seifert (2024-03-10 21:24:20+00:00): Ich habe jetzt die Objekte mit layer = 0 versehen
tux67 (2024-03-01 09:41:17+00:00): Hi CJMalone,
ich nehme mal exemplarisch dieses CS mit den Aldi Website Änderungen.
Einen "Deep Link" finde ich im Sinne der Haltbarkeit (wie oft ändern Firmen ihr CMS, mit dem einhergehenden Resultat einer Änderung dieser Links gegenüber der Wahrscheinlichkeit einer Änderung der Domain) nicht unbedingt eine Verbesserung.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website#Durability_and_machine-readability
Da fände ich eine Unterbringung der Filiale z.B. in url=* besser.

Gruß
tux67
tux67 (2024-03-01 09:50:33+00:00): sorry - I see there is a maproulette task even proposing this approach .. so I better blame maproulette ..
CjMalone (2024-03-01 10:53:52+00:00): If you want a generic brand website, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:brand:website may be a better option.
tux67 (2024-03-01 12:26:49+00:00): Might be .. Annoying is only that the challenge simply overwrites existing information without the intention to keep it as still being valid and more durable than the deep link.
CjMalone (2024-03-01 12:44:19+00:00): I don't see this as a loss of `brand:website`, but an improvement of `website`.

Personally, I see very little value in `brand:website` when there is `brand:wikidata`. It can be auto generated.
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q41171672#P856

Then it can be updated in a single place, where as if you wanted to change `brand:website` on every object it would take a large changeset or years.

However I wouldn't object if you wanted to add `brand:website`, I just wont be doing it myself.
SuborbitalPigeon (2024-02-29 23:28:01+00:00): That's very kind of you!
Igor Bubelov (2024-03-01 04:02:56+00:00): Hi!

Does this place accept bitcoins directly or perhaps there is an ATM inside? Did you notice any signs or stickers?
sheldonelectric (2024-03-01 06:36:34+00:00): helo, yes there is sticker. i don't know about atm.
SK53 (2024-03-07 22:00:37+00:00): This, and numerous other polygons mapped hereabouts is a barrier=hedge not landuse=forest. If you don't know what a wooded area is please use natural=wood: apart from Newborough Warren most woodland on Anglesey is deciduous broadleaved semi-natural woodland, not forests.

Thanks,

Jerry aka SK53
mcliquid (2024-03-01 08:16:07+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!