piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
osm_Ralef (2023-03-27 14:29:28+00:00): Ich war ganz offen gesagt nicht vor Ort und habe mich nur auf die TV Meldung bezogen. Dort ist nur von entfernten Automat die Rede, wie in allen anderen Orten auch. Ich komme da in den nächsten Monaten aber bestimmt mal vorbei. Ich schlage vor, wir lassen den Note auf und ich checke das dann vor Ort.
Vil4ckc (2023-03-24 20:43:38+00:00): https://m.facebook.com/groups/Kovalin/permalink/2393413757409672/?sfnsn=mo&ref=share
user_5359 (2023-03-25 07:04:19+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Eine Übernachtungsmöglichkeit in einen Kleingartenverein? Bitte bedenke, dass diese kein Testkarte sondern eine offizielle Produktionsdatenbank ist.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-29 03:04:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 134238792, 134242163 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits by a new user in Western Sahara that broke boundary polygons
ovruni (2023-03-25 00:59:00+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se han eliminado objetos y por ningun lado se menciona el motivo, por otra parte nuevamente se menciona correcciones de etiquetas y se siguen agregando etiquetas no existentes, puede consultar en la wiki sobre alguna etiqueta https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page
Saludos
brianboru (2023-04-10 13:44:04+00:00): Last time I looked there was no railway viaduct under construction leading into Curzon street it's still only at groundworks stage  so railway=proposed is still the most appropriate. Showing a viaduct under construction is misleading as to what's on the ground. Please revert
WC392309 (2023-03-24 22:51:00+00:00): Also I meant secondary btw
MxxCon (2023-03-29 19:07:52+00:00): Hello.
What is the source of this data?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134086180
2170chm (2023-04-01 21:34:06+00:00): Local knowledge
MxxCon (2023-04-01 21:43:05+00:00): Please provide some supporting evidence that it's there.
MxxCon (2023-04-01 21:44:20+00:00): All the info I have shows that it doesn't exist there.
jmarchon (2023-03-25 14:30:36+00:00): Nice work! Welcome to OSM!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134086724
MxxCon (2023-03-29 19:11:03+00:00): Hello.
Your edit created inconsistent data.
You added name:en= tag, but didn't touch name= tag, nor any other information about what seems to be previous business?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134086807
matheusgomesms (2023-03-29 19:44:17+00:00): Hi MxxCon,

Yes, Organic Maps is causing this issue, which they are already aware of, but didn't solve yet.

Thanks for your comments!

Best,
Matheus
gscholz (2023-03-28 07:20:16+00:00): Hi Vallio Enzo,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=9.96118&lat=45.57957&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=134086954

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Guido
gscholz (2023-03-28 07:22:54+00:00): Sorry, wrong OSMI view. Here is the correct one:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=10.29057&lat=45.55913&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1
JassKurn (2023-03-26 15:13:15+00:00): Hi, thanks for updating this road.

I made some changes to the road and it now has slightly different tagging.
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/456174990

Change from access=no, to access=private. Private is more realistic since the road is used to access properties. Then adding foot=designated there is foot access for everyone, despite the private tag.

Made some other changes in area using Public Footpath data from 
https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/
NavierStokes (2023-03-25 07:39:43+00:00): Super, danke !
SomeoneElse (2023-03-25 19:20:15+00:00): Hello Olyon,
Please do not use changeset comments such as "Corrigé avec Osmose". With no information about what it was that you changed or what source you used.
Osmose is merely a suggestion of things that you may need to investigate; it is not an indication of an error.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2023-03-25 19:20:38+00:00): Bonjour Olion,
Merci de ne pas utiliser de commentaires de changeset tels que "Corrigé avec Osmose". Sans aucune information sur ce que vous avez changé ou sur la source que vous avez utilisée.
Osmose n'est qu'une suggestion de choses sur lesquelles vous devrez peut-être enquêter; ce n'est pas une indication d'erreur.
Cordialement,
Andy
Hufkratzer (2023-03-25 00:30:12+00:00): Hi,
Isn't https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157081622 a riding arena? Riding arenas should be tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding
Jacek L (2023-03-25 21:30:55+00:00): Hi Hufkratzer, you are right!
SomeoneElse (2023-03-25 13:15:20+00:00): Hello,
I think a couple of things went wrong here.  One was that the Chiltern Hills AONB had a gap in it.  You can just about see this at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1sRF (although that does join the gap up).  I've fixed that in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134103405 .
The other thing was that the school somehow got a "building" tag applied to the whole area.  I've removed that in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134103507 .
I hope this is all OK - any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.
Best Regards,
Andy
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-06-14 15:56:07+00:00): Hi, you've made the path along the south of botanical garden hop the fence a few times, it should be outside.
dgmapping (2023-06-14 21:58:20+00:00): Thanks for noticing it! I must have turned landuse off when editing it with iD. Now it should be fixed.
emersonveenstra (2023-03-25 02:59:01+00:00): Hi,

Did you mean to name this entire path the "Nicole Bloom Memorial Trailhead"? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17842416
Mecheye (2023-03-30 17:17:02+00:00): Probably not! I fixed it
Henry572 (2023-03-25 12:42:43+00:00): Hallo Spaziergänger,
Ich habe mir deine Bearbeitung angeschaut, weil du das im iD-Editor angeklickt hattest. Im Grunde sieht alles gut aus. Für die Öffnungszeiten gibt es allerdings ein bestimmtes Format, um diese auch maschinell auswerten zu können. Das System wird unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours beschrieben und unter https://codepen.io/AlejoFab/full/WLbBQr kann man Öffnungszeiten automatisch in dieses Format umwandeln lassen. Ich habe das mal übernommen und dabei noch ein bisschen mehr zusammengefasst.
Viele Grüße,
Henry
kapazao (2023-03-25 10:35:46+00:00): Hola, por favor trata de dar referencias sobre las ediciones que haces para que los demás podamos revisarlas.
En este caso la localización de las poblaciones se realizó usando el Callejero Digital de Andalucía Unificado y situaba esas poblaciones donde estaban.
Aunque he comprobado que en los nombres de las vías aparecen según las moviste y podría estar bien, te agradecería que explicaras por qué las moviste a otro lugar y dieras referencias para que quede registrado y otro usuario no las volviese a situar en otro lugar.

Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134088856
kapazao (2023-03-25 10:35:47+00:00): Hola, por favor trata de dar referencias sobre las ediciones que haces para que los demás podamos revisarlas.
En este caso la localización de las poblaciones se realizó usando el Callejero Digital de Andalucía Unificado y situaba esas poblaciones donde estaban.
Aunque he comprobado que en los nombres de las vías aparecen según las moviste y podría estar bien, te agradecería que explicaras por qué las moviste a otro lugar y dieras referencias para que quede registrado y otro usuario no las volviese a situar en otro lugar.

Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134088856
dphuerta (2023-03-25 10:56:29+00:00): ¡Hola!

Entiendo que dar como souce local knowledge no sea fuente suficiente en este caso (soy natural del municipio). La verdad es que no acerté a encontrar un campo en el que pegar una URL como fuente, pero un documento oficial en el que están las ubicaciones correctas se puede consultar en el ITACA (Inventario Toponímico de Asentamientos de la Comunidad de Andalucía): 

https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/institutodeestadisticaycartografia/prodCartografia/toponimia/itaca.htm

El documento en concreto de Benamaurel es este:

https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/institutodeestadisticaycartografia/prodCartografia/toponimia/itaca/validados/ITACA_Benamaurel.pdf

Y la noticia de la aprobación del documento por el Pleno del ayuntamiento de Benamaurel está aquí:

https://ws089.juntadeandalucia.es/institutodeestadisticaycartografia/blog/2019/05/41-nuevos-municipios-itaca/

Por algún motivo hace muchos años que la ubicación de estas poblaciones es incorrecta en muchos mapas, pero gracias a proyectos como el anterior, en el que participan distintas entidades oficiales, se deberán ir corrigiendo los errores como este.

Coméntame si debo pegar estas fuentes de alguna forma concreta en el conjunto de cambios, o si basta con dejarlo como comentario.

Gracias, ¡un saludo!
eggie (2023-03-25 09:14:47+00:00): Dag Dillen...  Je vraagt feedback.. Lijkt me prima zo. 
gr eggie
user_16318098 (2023-03-25 04:58:29+00:00): なぜ豊平川右岸通の一部区間や、すでに適切にタグ付けされていた、2車線でセンターライン・通過交通のある道路(unclassified, tertiary)をresidentialに変更されたのでしょうか？

以前お伝えした通り、住宅街内にある道路が必ずしもresidentialになるとは限りません。

よろしくお願いします。
InsertUser (2023-03-26 09:44:17+00:00): These don't appear to be valid international format and the phone number appears to have merged two alternate numbers into a single invalid one. Perhapse `phone=` and `alt_phone=` could be used?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134089739
Necessarycoot72 (2023-03-27 03:47:05+00:00): fixed
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-23 21:59:54+00:00): If it still exists but doesn't go anywhere (which seems likely based on aerial photography), then mapping it and tagging aeroway=taxiway, access=no would be correct.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134089758
Local-Mapper (2023-03-25 02:50:22+00:00): Xcel Energy *turbines*
emersonveenstra (2023-03-25 13:02:28+00:00): Hi,

You changed the highway=construction tag of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/627869437 to highway=cycleway, but you left the access=no and construction=footway tags. Since it's not clear from your changeset comment what you were trying to do, if it's no longer under construction, you need to remove the construction and access tags. If it's still under construction, you need to change it back to highway=construction. Thanks!
Trail_Caretaker (2023-03-26 01:59:22+00:00): When I was down there a few weeks ago the path looked paved the entire way but was blocked off still.  Why can't a path be not-under-construction, but blocked off for some other reason.  For instance we had a path that was finished in Walled Lake area be blocked off for a year after they finished the path and new bridge, because the city wanted to open it with a ceremonial ribbon cutting.  I am not sure what you don't like about my work here.  Would you care to elaborate?  I will of course fix something if I made a mistake.
emersonveenstra (2023-03-27 11:10:23+00:00): Okay, that's more of a grey area I guess. Personally, I would say that it's still under construction because it hasn't opened yet, but that's also not something worth debating over, so if you disagree, that's fine. I would probably add a note about why the trail is still access=no so people aren't confused (because it doesn't say anywhere online that it's done with construction)

Either way, you did mistakenly leave the construction=footway tag on the path
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-25 04:25:05+00:00): Reverted by DWG - vandalism & another sock puppet account: changeset/134091399
martianfreeloader (2023-03-31 09:21:12+00:00): Hey,
welcome to Openstreetmap. You tagged Ižanska with access=no. A couple of questions:

* The tag implies that *nothing* can can through (not even pedestrians or cyclists). Is this true? If not, then motor_vehicle=no would be the correct tag.

* How long will this restriction last? It is important that someone will remove the tag once construction is over. For short closures, it is often better to not map them at all or to use other mapping techniques that make sure someone will check the progress from time to time
10inchesinurmum (2023-03-31 12:55:04+00:00): Hello,
As far as I know cyclists cannot ride the bike as the sidewalk is also under constructions, not sure about pedestrians though. The issue is, that we calculate payments for our couriers (Wolt company) by the driven distance. Bicycles use "walking" navigation mode. 

I have a spreadsheet of the changes that I do in Openstreet maps and the dates when construction should end. I will make sure these restrictions are removed, when needed, as we also do not want to overpay if not needed.
martianfreeloader (2023-03-31 13:37:47+00:00): Ok. Thank you for keeping track of this. Accurate contribution to Openstreetmap is always very welcome.

You should obviously not do wrong mapping in OSM because of your individual software requirements. The way to go would be to improve your software, not hacking osm data by adding wrong tags.

As you might be aware, openstreetmap is a community project. The data are free to *use* by they *belong* to the community. Thousands of voluntary mappers put millions of hours of unpaid work into this project. It serves a very wide range of a multitude of purposes. OSM is not built to serve the special purposes of only particular company.

There are a couple of good routing engines that distinguish between pedestrians and cyclists. One example is Graphhopper:
https://graphhopper.com/maps/?profile=bike&layer=Cyclosm
10inchesinurmum (2023-03-31 14:37:47+00:00): The road is closed for pedestrians as well.
martianfreeloader (2023-04-01 13:53:48+00:00): Cool, looks like it's tagged correctly then!

Do you happen to know how residents access their sidestreets, like for example Šivičeva?
martianfreeloader (2023-07-16 15:51:18+00:00): Hi,

"I have a spreadsheet of the changes that I do in Openstreet maps and the dates when construction should end."

When should the construction end for Ižanska?
10inchesinurmum (2023-07-16 16:18:33+00:00): It should end approximately end of August.
martianfreeloader (2023-07-16 16:20:46+00:00): Thanks.
martianfreeloader (2024-01-23 14:11:18+00:00): Hi,

Has Ižanska been reopened or is it still under construction?
10inchesinurmum (2024-02-07 11:15:32+00:00): A part of Ižanska is still closed, I have checked with the most recent info and  will open the parts that are no longer in construction. The rest of I žanska (from Hladnikova downwards is expected to open by the end of March)
martianfreeloader (2024-02-07 12:58:36+00:00): Cool, thanks a lot!
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-25 04:25:14+00:00): Reverted by DWG - vandalism & another sock puppet account: changeset/134091399
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-25 04:20:15+00:00): You don't have names on address interpolation ways
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-25 04:25:24+00:00): Reverted by DWG - vandalism & another sock puppet account: changeset/134091399
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-25 04:25:36+00:00): Reverted by DWG - vandalism & another sock puppet account: changeset/134091399
SomeoneElse (2023-04-30 16:00:57+00:00): That source doesn't suggest that as a name, just a description.
Falsernet (2023-04-30 16:50:55+00:00): I find it hard to see how you might have come to that conclusion. If you perform an internet search for "Kirby Muxloe Interchange" there are numerous results pointing to J21A, and using the name word-for-word. 

Whether a name is used in an official capacity or not, that doesn't detract from its existence in common usage. As I'm sure you're aware the name=* key is intended for the name most commonly used. If not for the junction number being quicker to spell out, this would be the obvious way to refer to the junction.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-25 04:25:49+00:00): Reverted by DWG - vandalism & another sock puppet account: changeset/134091399
Frank Peng (2023-04-23 20:28:01+00:00): It looks like someone was pretending to be some children's TV show character causing vandalism on OSM. https://abby-hatcher.fandom.com/wiki/Abby_Hatcher_(character)
manojkmohan (2023-09-19 18:30:48+00:00): Hi Ashvinraj. In this edit you changed a post office named bus stop to postoffice and its effects 74 relations of bus routes. 

I am reverting the specific node tags to previous. Please take care when you edit existing informations. Thanks for understanding. Happy Mapping.
manojkmohan (2023-09-19 18:32:00+00:00): If you have any doubts regards tags, you can ask osm kerala https://t.me/osmkerala telegram group
Msiipola (2023-04-28 16:59:28+00:00): Hi! Building created on top of a cycleway.
Jan_Kola (2023-05-05 08:57:09+00:00): Hi Msiipola,

Thank you for the feedback, I aligned the cycle way according to the latest imagery.
Kovoschiz (2023-03-25 09:23:08+00:00): `addr:place=` should only be used for villages which have address numbers assigned to them. It is very common to have housing estates within villages.
relaemanila (2023-03-26 12:54:02+00:00): Hello!

Only places are used as nodes. For this combination, do the following.

* landuse=residential
* residential=rural
* name=*

I will be modifying your creation right now. Thank you!
Taya_S (2023-03-25 05:09:19+00:00): This edit involves some amount of shoreline editing, something I am not expirienced with. Because of that I'd appreciate it if someone could make sure I didnt mess something up.
eggie (2023-03-25 09:28:02+00:00): Hi Thiskal...  
Yes.. allways tricky... 
Rendering will take long by changing the coastline. (weeks)
The coastline is still okay.
Your background PDOK picture  Actueel was taken was taken at high tide.
You removed a lot of sandy area. Maybe have a look again. (Low Tide)

If you use PDOK 25 cm 2022 you will see sand at the  'Het Rif'.
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=25-03-2022&loc=53.46235%2C6.142387%2C14z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2022-09-05&acqid=20220905_110130_SV1-03&sensor=SuperView-1

Greetz,
eggie
Taya_S (2023-03-25 10:45:12+00:00): Hello Eggie,

Thank you for your comment. Good to know all is intact. Now its just waiting for the map to update.

I purposely removed a lot of the beach there, because the OSM wiki mentions having to use "the point of highest tide". So going by the PDOK picture Actueel imagery seems fine to me. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Coastline 

Let me know if you have any other thoughts on this.
eggie (2023-03-25 11:02:43+00:00): I think in this case it's okay if the wiki says so about the tide.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-07 12:22:14+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3821204 ?
user_5359 (2023-03-25 07:09:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys).
Tomas_J (2023-07-23 09:39:15+00:00): Ahoj, preco je tato cast cykloschodnika zatvorena? Je to este stale platne? Vedie po nej Pohronska cyklomagistrala. Dik.

Hi, why is this part of the cycloway closed? Is it still valid?
Mashin (2023-03-25 14:31:02+00:00): Hi,
the question is if the border is officially defined as the center of the river or rather as fixed coordinates (where the river was centuries ago).
FrankOverman (2023-03-25 07:04:59+00:00): Tnx, je bent me 17min voor.
literan (2023-03-25 12:47:24+00:00): и остались подъезды в воздухе висеть...
ForstEK (2023-03-25 13:21:52+00:00): Замечания к автору Everydoor. Я ещё не добрался до josm сегодня.
catdreamer (2023-03-25 08:25:09+00:00): tag上有disused是為保留節點歷史，圖資也不會顯示，請勿再刪了
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
user_5359 (2023-03-26 16:16:20+00:00): Hello! Please use lowercase characters for a key.
Supaplex (2023-03-25 10:59:02+00:00): 郵局物流園區的 construction 沒清乾淨
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134093545
Henry572 (2023-03-25 12:33:05+00:00): Hallo Marcuskai,
Ich habe mir deine Änderungen angeschaut, weil du das im iD-Editor angeklickt hattest. Es sieht alles gut aus.
Nur als Anregung: Man kann die einzelnen Eingänge auch separat erfassen, indem man an der jeweiligen Stelle einen Punkt im Umriss des Gebäudes einfügt und an diesen die Adress-Informationen eingibt sowie diesen Eingang wie in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:entrance beschrieben, also wahrscheinlich mit yes oder home, markiert. Dann braucht man die Adresse am Gebäude nicht mehr.
Viele Grüße,
Henry
user_5359 (2023-03-25 08:52:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for posting this address! Feel free to add the addresses in your neighborhood as well
user_5359 (2023-03-26 16:55:51+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/2281115882. What is the meaning of the tag 
ofq = Filia Urzędu Pocztowego nr 1
?
azalizh (2023-03-26 21:51:32+00:00): @user_5359 Thank you for catching my mistake. I was using JOSM and incorrectly used official_name. I fixed it.
cats_pajamas (2023-05-01 22:40:35+00:00): Hello nuscie283,

I noticed that recently you have been making many edits to motorway, trunk, and primary highways in Pakistan. Many of these edits are great; it is good to see improvements being made to Pakistan OSM data. There is, however, an area that I’d like to discuss with you.

I see that in this changeset you added a ref=N-95 tag to the Mingora Bypass highway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/691024633 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1025228910) citing this NHA map for the N-95 highway (https://nha.gov.pk/roads/topic/15994). While researching this highway, it appears the N-95 route passes through the center of Mingora rather than following the Mingora Bypass.

After your edit, there are now two N-95 routes in the city. One following the Mingora Bypass which you added, and one incomplete route, which was not removed, going through the center of the city (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1025421705 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/665933081 as well as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/864558559 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1025175584). Ideally there should be a single route for this ref.

What are your thoughts on this ref route as well as this resource? I would like to maintain the data here in the highest quality possible, and value your input as you seem to be a skilled mapper who is active in the area.

I look forward to hearing from you!

cats_pajamas
monotar (2023-03-25 23:57:36+00:00): Nach all den Hinweisen baust du immer noch Kreuzungen um und scherst dich Null Komma Null um korrekte Turn-Restrictions. Da kann man auch gegen eine Wand reden.
Henry572 (2023-03-25 12:12:09+00:00): Looks good, although it's not strictly necessary to open a separate changeset for this edit.
peateasea (2023-03-25 14:12:22+00:00): Moin. Thanks for the review and the advice!
Henry572 (2023-03-25 12:09:50+00:00): Looks good, although it's not strictly necessary to open a separate changeset for this edit.
bxl-forever (2023-03-25 12:22:34+00:00): Hello,

Are those tags documented somewhere?  I would like to know more about those, to be sure to do it right next time we have such future infrastructure.

e.g. railway=construction + construction=tram is supposed to be enough, but I see that ORM requires "construction:railway=tram" instead.

Thanks in advance.
sokol15 (2023-03-25 12:25:43+00:00): Hello! Yes, there is a wiki page on this. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging
bxl-forever (2023-03-25 15:11:05+00:00): I don't want to be rude but I looked at the wiki before asking and there is no mention of using tags such as "construction:railway=tram".

That is why I am puzzled about where such a tag—which feels unnecessary to me when looking at the wiki, which makes no mention of using lifecycle prefixes—comes from.

Have a nice day.