piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Radiat47 (2026-03-27 14:40:53+00:00): Hello, I haven't mapped pedestrian crossings, but paths used for connecting the sidewalks. And I cannot agree with your arguments as:
- they are located on natural connecting lines of the sidewalk network and used by people to cross the roads there (so when missing, it strongly devalues the OSM network)
- it is legal to cross the road if there is no official pedestrian crossing nearby, as far as I know
- whether crossing the road is safe or not is strongly dependent on many temproal factors (e. g. traffic density at the time, walker's/runner's skills, etc.) and cannot and should not be evaluated by a cartographer
Buraddo (2026-03-27 18:01:22+00:00): - I understand the natural connecting lines reason, however I do not believe the paths mentioned are good examples of this. I do not agree that the lack of them "strongly devalues the OSM network", but on the contrary, I would like OSM to have mapped the actual state of the network, with legal, safe or at least commonly used ways, which those are neither.
- It is not legal to cross here. Romanian legislation is permitting crossing at street intersections if there are no nearby marked pedestrian crossings, which is certainly not the case here (no street intersection, and the nearest crossing to the paths mapped are at 70, 100 and 110 meters, which while there is no legal distance mentioned, I would argue is not enough for the law to be in effect)
jayaddison (2026-03-27 11:14:31+00:00): Thank you!
eggie (2026-03-26 19:48:40+00:00): Dag maikoool,
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Wat heb je precies gedaan, want de routerelatie is hier nu stuk.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
maikoool (2026-03-26 19:54:56+00:00): Ik heb de inhoud van de operator tag van 'Staatsbsobeheer' naar 'Staatsbosbeheer' veranderd. Verder niets.
eggie (2026-03-26 20:00:06+00:00): Ahhh   .. Oke...   In de route zaten gaten, maar die zaten er dan al in.
Ik heb wat gesorteerd. Alleen een aanlooproute die nog niet klopt  gooit nog wat roet in het eten. 
Dan is het oke verder.

MVG
eggie
felipeeugenio (2026-03-26 20:27:36+00:00): Hola. Te contesté varias cosas en el chat.

Pero para cosas mas puntuales quizas mejor por acá.

un path es un camino por el que no pueden transitar vehiculos de 4 ruedas. por un track (camino forestar o agricola en la gran mayoria de los casos) si se puede. Tener eso en cuenta.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180472887
aparra09 (2026-03-26 20:51:13+00:00): Hola de nuevo. Entiendo. Si, eso lo busqué. Lo que agregué es una camino o sendero por él que se puede pasar caminando, bicicleta o a caballo. No da el ancho para vehículos de 4 ruedas
aselvadeasfalto (2026-04-03 10:30:31+00:00): Olá, Jota Cartas.

Espero que tenha sido um lapso genuíno o facto de o Jardim Botânico do Porto ter sido alterado de leisure=park para building=* — e, sobretudo, para "building=pt:Jardim Botânico do Porto". Não só o recinto inteiro não é um edifício como o valor dado para a chave building=* deveria estar sob wikipedia=*. Esta situação deve ser rectificada.

Cumprimentos,
Selva
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 13:57:15+00:00): Cleaned up remaining stray highway nodes added here (after SEO spam tags were already removed) in changeset 184433452

https://osm.org/changeset/184433452
Wulf4096 (2026-07-03 09:50:42+00:00): Änderung rückgängig gemacht. Entsprechende Verbote gibt es hier nicht.
TriRIK (2026-03-26 19:59:18+00:00): This is from a recent drive survey.

For reference, green signs for directions are used on highways and require an emergency lane and higher speed limit of 130.
TriRIK (2026-03-26 20:00:05+00:00): Also fixes wrong one-way link near Ohrid.
Suneel Sanatani (2026-03-26 20:03:52+00:00): Sloriya
Wulf4096 (2026-07-03 09:50:46+00:00): Änderung rückgängig gemacht. Entsprechende Verbote gibt es hier nicht.
Wildsharky (2026-04-01 14:40:51+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180576135
NeisBot (2026-03-26 20:18:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/777805359 v2 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/777805362 v3 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7258923656 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180473780
iandees (2026-03-26 20:20:36+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7258923656 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180474020, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
MappingMore (2026-03-27 12:04:02+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180499088
Erick Araujo (2026-03-27 13:36:26+00:00): Why you update it? If you don't know the area please don't do things like this! I've already spoked a lot with you because of changes likes this, i'm reverting it now!!!!! Please don't do things like this again if you don't the area!!!!!!!!! Tell the other guys of apple data team about it, thanks in advance.
ChromeLotus (2026-03-30 19:05:19+00:00): Greetings Erick Araujo,

The modifications were made with intention to improve Terminal BRT Metropolitano Pedro Fernandes based on recent Vantor Hub imagery published on 2026-03-25 which shows construction on the station has completed. Apple has an agreement with Vantor Hub to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which is not publicly available for editing OpenStreetMap. We generally use the imagery that is already available in JOSM but where we do use that more recent imagery, we always cite it and the date the imagery is from in the changeset source. I felt these modifications were worth making and I noticed some of them were kept, however if you have local insight regarding the status of this venue, I am happy to defer to your knowledge.

One thing I am curious about is the two construction ways (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1372502750, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1372502752) that will represent future viaducts connecting to the station. Do you know whether additional changes will be made for this station in the future? And if so, do you have any resources you could share regarding the station’s development?

Our team appreciates your input and perspective as a local, and are always open to discussing and collaborating on the updates we make.
I look forward to hearing from you and thank you for your time.
Erick Araujo (2026-03-30 21:47:07+00:00): Looking at the satellite and updating maps without local knowledge, what easy work, even I can do it, I just wouldn't do it if it meant destroying the local work that had already been done around the terminal. In the same way that you have the source that you blindly believe in what you are seeing, I also have my sources and since it is apparently not in your interest to make the corrections, I don't see why you should inform me. Anyway, I repeat, there is a group on Telegram for the local community and we will be more than willing to discuss improvements to the maps, if you are interested in stopping destroying the correct data and come talk, the channel is this: t.me/osmrj
Finally, I ask that you stop destroying already consolidated data since, I repeat, YOU DO NOT HAVE LOCAL KNOWLEDGE! I can make satellite-based updates all over the world, but I don't...
ajmat (2026-03-27 08:59:18+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 180491391
ajmat (2026-03-28 06:20:49+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 180529864
george1201 (2026-03-26 22:38:45+00:00): Ist die FeWo vor Ort ausgeschildert?
ZLima12 (2026-04-07 23:06:11+00:00): Hi,

Did you consult the community for this large mechanical edit? It appears unlikely that you checked every single piece of roadway and made sure that this name was actually commonly used.
ZLima12 (2026-04-08 00:10:30+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181024481
juni_vv (2026-03-30 10:44:29+00:00): Hoi Cindayra,
Ziet er goed uit hoor.
yelisey90 (2026-03-26 22:31:31+00:00): fitness_station, I guess?
Khidistavi (2026-03-27 08:43:01+00:00): Yes, you’re right — I’ve fixed it.
MappingMore (2026-03-27 12:51:06+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180501023
Wildsharky (2026-04-01 14:35:57+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180493145
Karthoo (2026-03-30 13:59:41+00:00): Hallo, danke für deine Bearbeitung! Der Rossmann war allerdings bereits in OSM erfasst - es dauert immer ein paar Wochen, bis eine neue Änderung es in die OrganicMaps-Daten schafft.
Wildsharky (2026-04-01 14:29:40+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180491306
aTarom (2026-03-27 10:59:58+00:00): Hola
"gtfs_id"
es deprecated, pot ser
"gtfs:stop_id"
ó
"gtfs:route_id"
?
a
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13683425370/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13683411626/history
Salutacions
blacx (2026-03-27 15:39:13+00:00): Tens raó, ho vaig posar malament, hauria de ser gtfs:stop_id
aTarom (2026-03-27 16:12:19+00:00): Fet, Gràcies
marc__marc (2026-03-31 11:20:17+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour ces contributions.
cependant il y a 3 problèmes :
1) la source : d'oü viennes les données ? c'est nécessaire pour vérifier que la licence de ces données est compatible avec celle d'OpenStreetMap
2) la manière de les ajouter, par ex ce noeud qui dit oü s'arreter pour céder le passage est déconnecté de la route
3) un descriptif du groupe de changement "copie d'élément osm" est non seulement faux (c'est pas une copie d'élément osm existant, c'est au contraire un ajout) mais surtout ne décrit pas le pourquoi.
un bon descriptif serrait :
- ajout des cédez le passage manquant
ou
- nouveau panneau de circulation mis en place
pour en savoir plus
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Par ailleurs le fait d'éclater chaque modification dans un groupe rend le suivit particulièrement pénible

Cordialement,
Marc
Hufkratzer (2026-03-30 19:53:50+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493255646 does not look like a horse riding center ( leisure?horse_riding ), it looks like a horse riding arena and in this case should be tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian instead; example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1467651492 . See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
Janel Johnson NV (2026-03-31 04:56:02+00:00): Thank you for the correction.
bxl-forever (2026-03-31 00:13:35+00:00): Hello,

There seems to be a problem with your tool.  You are importing several highway=give_way nodes that are not connected to the road.
Aim311_ (2026-03-28 16:53:02+00:00): Hey. When you're mapping a military area don't forget to add access.
W tym przypadku access=no.
qugeb (2026-03-28 19:35:36+00:00): Hallo,
siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
iandees (2026-03-26 21:51:50+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9333034025 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180477178, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-03-26 21:48:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/291629338 v9

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mexican restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-03 22:33:33+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/180562905
nevw (2026-03-27 02:07:30+00:00): Hi, you need to zoom in much closer and draw the outline of the house instead of the land plot
Kees 59 (2026-03-27 08:32:00+00:00): Hi

Ik heb deze node verwijderd omdat het een duplicaat was van https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2848020749

In Nederland wordt een POI in de regel gecombineerd met de adres node.
NeisBot (2026-03-26 21:54:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/275302174 v3 | 9 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180477190
NeisBot (2026-03-26 21:57:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13682256437 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Orthodontic clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-03 22:33:44+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180832931
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-03-26 22:03:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13683432474 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tattoo parlor"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-03 22:33:50+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180832934
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
kubahahaha (2026-03-27 10:24:16+00:00): Zmieniłem lekko podjazdy - dodałem tunnel=building_passage.
Z ciekawości - jaka nawigacja prowadzi po highway=track (drogach na pola)? To jest raczej błąd w tej nawigacji
Lishoo (2026-03-27 23:51:31+00:00): OSMand
eggie (2026-03-27 07:20:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Hier staat op het gebouw Het Mosaiek. Bestaat deze school nog? En op welk adres zit het 	Omnis College?
De tag amenity=school ontbreekt. 

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-03-27 07:29:07+00:00): Info samengevoegd met de adresnode en naam Het Mozaiek verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
Andrea Musuruane (2026-03-27 08:06:12+00:00): This fix is wrong. 800 numbers cannot be called from abroad. You have to use the phone:IT tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180477883
Kartibu (2026-03-27 09:25:37+00:00): Thanks. Fixed.
Andrea Musuruane (2026-03-27 08:11:15+00:00): The original fax number was wrong. Therefore the fix is wrong too. https://www.oraridiapertura24.it/filiale/Biella-Sda%2520Filiale-2023572P.html
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180477887
Kartibu (2026-03-27 09:31:05+00:00): fixed
aTarom (2026-03-27 11:20:26+00:00): Hola,
"parking:orientation"
está deprecated
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:orientation
no estoy seguro por las imágenes aéreas de si es en un solo lado, en un tramo...
quizás es mejor dibujar la zona de aparcamiento y poner "orientation",
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:orientation
pero no lo tengo claro sin conocer la zona.
Saludos
Strubbl (2026-03-28 19:57:34+00:00): Hi Demowa,

der Pfad https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/909173870 und der andere vom Parkplatz zum Steinmetz sind keine Fußwege. Schau mal ins Wiki bitte: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=footway?uselang=de
Es ist auch nicht baulich erklärbar, dass zu footway zu ändern. Das sind Schleichwege.

Viele Grüße
ScrawnyMeowth1 (2026-03-31 23:25:52+00:00): Hello dbqeditor,

Lot numbers are not the same as address numbers. The actual addresses for these parcels can be found on the county's GIS page: https://gisportal.franklin.co.franklin.wa.us/arcgisportal2/apps/experiencebuilder/experience/?id=d6f10a2da68d462f8822a49e3e51d665#data_s=id%3AdataSource_1-199588549dc-layer-14-12%3A728

Also, make sure you're only using sources that are compatible with OpenStreetMap's open data license.
dbqeditor (2026-04-02 21:07:14+00:00): They are legally considered 911 alternate addresses until a street address is assigned by the jurisdiction. All data we use is CC licensed and free to use.
OlasMapy (2026-03-27 13:55:41+00:00): wycięte? tylko te północne ale żeby wszystkie wycieli to nie widzialem
NeisBot (2026-03-26 22:51:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13683538701 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Plumbing contractor office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-04 04:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180837062
(Delete spam tags. First version)
D=SW (2026-03-28 05:43:48+00:00): شكراً لتعديلك.
يبدو أن تصنيف landuse=brownfield حُذف بالخطأ وهو لا يزال مطلوباً؛ يرجى استعادته أو سأقوم بذلك لاحقاً.
Mohamed_Gamal (2026-03-28 11:00:21+00:00): Dear,
Please define the feature that you exactly mean.
Thanks and Regards,
Mohamed Gamal
D=SW (2026-03-29 04:35:19+00:00): تم استرجاع جزئي لعناصر مهمة هنا
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180566185
dcapillae (2026-03-27 00:12:09+00:00): Hola.

Este conjunto de cambios se revertirá por los mismos motivos que se explican en este otro conjunto de cambios: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180479121
nevw (2026-03-27 03:19:52+00:00): Hi, osmi detects a problem with overly complex mapping.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.59007&lat=-28.79170&zoom=19
nevw (2026-03-28 12:23:08+00:00): Hi, I am wondering why 11 Megan Crescent house is a multipolygon and 5 Megan Crescent is not. They appear similar to me. 
Also curious about Megan Crescent Sports Ground and the adjacent wetland are both single member MPs but they share a way. I would split the shared way section and only include this bit once in each mp and not have a duplicate way.
Just curiosity, no judgement on the mapping methods chosen.
dcapillae (2026-03-27 00:10:49+00:00): Hola.

En OSM no mapeamos objetos que ya no existen. Para poder mapear una vía abandonada, la vía tiene que existir sobre el terreno. De lo contrario, no hay nada que mapear.

Hay un proyecto gestionado por OSM US para mapear objetos históricos que ya no existe, como, por ejemplo, una antigua vía de tren: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenHistoricalMap
rochirochi (2026-03-27 00:14:20+00:00): Hola. No estoy contigo. Tienes ejemplos como este por todo el mundo.
rochirochi (2026-03-27 00:15:57+00:00): Mismamente, en Campanillas puedes observar que está mapeado de esta forma el trazado antiguo antes de que llegara la alta velocidad
dcapillae (2026-03-27 00:17:46+00:00): Las vías abandonadas se puede mapear, pero la vía tiene que existir. Si no hay vía, no hay nada que mapear.

La clave está en que el objeto exista sobre el terreno: si existe, se puede mapear, esté en uso o no, abandonado o en ruinas. Pero tiene que existir algo. De lo contrario, es un objeto más adecuado para OpenHistoricalMap.
dcapillae (2026-03-27 00:23:01+00:00): Imagino que la vía de Campanillas es esta: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175112208

Se trata de un elemento mapeado hace ¡13 años!

Si no quedan restos de esa vía sobre el terreno, se puede eliminar.

Una de los principios de OSM es que se puedan verificar los objetos, es decir, que un segundo mapeador vaya a la zona y verifique que efectivamente ese objeto existe. Si no hay una vía férrea abandonada allí, no debería estar en el mapa.
rochirochi (2026-03-27 00:25:05+00:00): En cualquier caso:
1. No afecta al entendimiento del mapa, puesto, que no se renderiza en las capas habituales provocando equívocos.
2. Estos datos se utilizan en portales especializados como openrailwaymap.org.
3. Es una práctica extendida.
rochirochi (2026-03-27 00:28:16+00:00): La etiqueta razed en lugar de abandoned podría ser una mejor elección en estos casos:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Drazed
dcapillae (2026-03-27 00:31:37+00:00): Aunque todo eso pueda ser cierto, creo que lo que debe primar en este caso (y siempre) son las convenciones de edición y buenas prácticas de OSM. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Convenciones_y_est%C3%A1ndares_de_edici%C3%B3n
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas

No mapeamos objetos históricos en OSM.
dcapillae (2026-03-27 00:35:49+00:00): La etiqueta «railway=razed» no tiene el consenso de la comunidad, aunque esté en uso.

Si desea usarla, tenga en cuenta lo que dice el wiki en este punto: «Evite mapear antiguas vías férreas si es imposible determinar su trazado original a partir de imágenes terrestres o aéreas».

En definitiva, vuelve a recordar lo que dicen los estándares y convenciones de edición: no mapeamos objetos que no existen ni se puede verificar su existencia (trazado, características, ubicación) sobre el terreno.
dcapillae (2026-03-27 00:40:48+00:00): Solo un último apunte cordial: es un poco frustrante no poder mapear vías férreas desaparecidas en OSM, pero al final debemos respetar las normas del proyecto para mantener la coherencia y calidad del mapa.

A mí también me interesan mucho, la verdad. Es una pena que no se puedan incluir directamente, porque tienen bastante valor histórico, pero bueno, toca ajustarse a las normas de OSM para que el mapa siga siendo coherente para todos.