piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
RedAuburn (2024-09-20 13:48:21+00:00): (confirmed via phone)
RedAuburn (2024-09-20 13:48:51+00:00): (local knowledge)
Filip009 (2024-09-24 10:53:55+00:00): Zdravím, sú tie všetky trasy cyklochodníky? Pokiaľ nie, navrhujem zmeniť tagovanie na highway=path a cycleway=designated.
LSBK pajdo (2024-09-24 13:27:22+00:00): Pozdravujem, 

áno ide o novo vybudovane cyklotrasy (singletraily)
Filip009 (2024-09-24 17:36:28+00:00): Okej, tak by im bolo zmeniť tagovanie na higway=path + bicycle=designated. Takto sa totiž značia skorej mestské cyklochodníky.
LSBK pajdo (2024-09-25 11:38:09+00:00): Dakujem, upravil som to a pridal som tam mtb-singletrack aby bolo jasne, ze sa jedna o uzky chodnik pre bicykle.
Filip009 (2024-09-26 11:21:50+00:00): Väčšina týchto tagov/značiek je spracovávaná a počítačom a jedná sa o značky, na ktorých sa dohodli ľudia. Pre mtb trasy bola zhoda na vatvorení relácie, čo je objekt, ktorý obsahuje viacero čiar. Čiže to, čo ste tam pridal je v podstate zyvtočné. Lepšie by to bolo vytvoriť ako reláciu, alebo pridať ako poznámku (tag note=* daného objektu).
LSBK pajdo (2024-09-26 13:23:15+00:00): Ďakujem za pomoc, nabudúce budem vedieť.
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-02 23:54:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159862440, 159862427, 159862512, 159862481, 159862457, 159862433 where the changeset comment is: revert roblox_gmx edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16954
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-02 23:53:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159862440, 159862427, 159862512, 159862481, 159862457, 159862433 where the changeset comment is: revert roblox_gmx edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16954
eggie (2024-09-21 05:22:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Frans S (2024-09-23 11:08:45+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please tag highways in accordance with the wiki.
Here, you can tag highways within residential areas as highway = residential, or, narrow traces, highway=path.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156869627
Ferrocarriles de México (2024-09-22 01:13:27+00:00): Fíjate que la etiqueta tag="MEX 180D" debe ser así, sin guiones. Así es la convención que se usa en todo México y en muchos otros paises. El software usa esta etiqueta para saber que se trata de la misma carretera. Tu lo cambiaste y lo descompusiste. Si no sabes lo que haces, dejalo como está.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156933024
Frans S (2024-09-24 09:07:09+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping.
E: Buildings not squared.
G: Included the shadow of the building.
High building(s) incorrect mapped. See par 20 chapter About Buildings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156869733
VLD549 (2025-01-08 16:47:38+00:00): Hi Eebie,

May I ask why the name change to Hoeselt VV? Wikipedia indicates it to be KSV Hoeselt, and de site of the vereniging kvv Hoeselt. 

Thank you!
Eebie (2025-01-10 23:09:56+00:00): De geschiedenis van Hoeselt VV is vervolledigd op Wikipedia. In 2016 fusioneerde KSV Hoeselt met KAVV en de nieuwe clubnaam werd KVV Hoeselt. OSM is aangepast.
VLD549 (2025-03-14 15:05:08+00:00): Thank you!
VictorIE (2025-04-02 12:56:31+00:00): Hi,

Well done on mapping the PEC building with the complex shapes. :)

Are you sure this bit is right? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1316938254

It you look here: https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=54.5810950&lon=-5.9303272&zoom=19&camera.theta=80&camera.phi=38.445  it doesn't look like the photo: https://www.qub.ac.uk/student-blog/student-life/queens-sport.html
LateNightTone (2025-04-02 13:30:32+00:00): Thanks, I had some time on my hands :-D

On that photo, the way you're talking about is just out of sight around the building, to the left. So you may be confusing it with the shelter over the main entrance on the north side (which admittedly I didn't map). I've made another edit which adds the entrance structure, in case that clarifies. The bit on the other side (from my own knowledge of it) has a basement space, while the ground floor is just a flat terrace.
LateNightTone (2025-04-02 13:30:57+00:00): I should add, it'll take around 24 hours for f4map to update, it's a bit annoying like that.
VictorIE (2025-04-03 07:48:39+00:00): Oh, it was the height=1 (instead of building:levels=1) for a building that piqued my interest. Of course, I was the worst offender. :D
LateNightTone (2025-04-03 10:16:58+00:00): Ah, fair enough :-)

This does highlight a wider difficulty around effectively mapping floor numbers, heights and separate parts of buildings that are on uneven/sloping ground though. Technically the way you mention, relative to ground level on the north side (entrance side), would have height=0, or perhaps height=-3 or something as it is a basement level. Meanwhile, where it sits on the south side, the ground level is much lower, so in reality it's more than a metre proud of the surrounding ground. I think my height=1 was a compromise to demonstrate the distinctive shape to the building (part). It's a difficult thing to standardise really.

Another nearby example is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148653738 which has an underground level which becomes ground level at one end of the building.
evgenykatyshev (2025-09-05 12:35:23+00:00): Hello! I wonder why did you  mark https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/284140135 this bridge as a tourist attraction?
Xvtn (2024-09-25 22:18:46+00:00): Looks like user Ezra Jenks just added some of those track roads in changeset 155487489. I'll comment there too to let them know. Perhaps one of you is using newer imagery than the other? Best to discuss, I think.
Oregonian3 (2024-09-25 22:41:56+00:00): In areas close to the Bonneville Shoreline Trail https://stateofthebst.org/explorer/ is a very helpful website for determining public access
wireguy (2024-09-20 15:56:43+00:00): Jon, Welcome to OSM.  Can you come back and check this change out?  Looks like a sidewalk has been accidently dragged into a parking lot, and also a drag of the service  road entry  across the street.
Keep mapping!  Oh, one more thing, you can batch your changes together instead of saving them one at a time.  Then you can give a more meaningful changeset, like Details for houses on Main Street.
mueschel (2024-09-22 08:44:39+00:00): Hi,
you used the new tag "maxtyres=6" here. Is this really a limitation on the number of tires, or is it the more usual maxaxles=3? I.e. do double tires on one axle count or not?

Are trailers included in the count?
mf8s003j (2024-09-22 12:03:06+00:00): The legal description is not the usual axles. It is 6 total tyres. From the bylaw quoted in the changeset source:

"No person shall operate a truck or truck tractor, which has more than six tires, along Jubilee Avenue, unless the vehicle is conducting business on Jubilee Avenue or on streets in the vicinity of Jubilee Avenue where Jubilee Avenue is the shortest routing to or from a Truck Route."

Signage at the on-ramps has an indicator for "Yes trucks" with a placard for "Max 6 tires"

I know that nowhere else in the world uses maxtyres, which is why I also tagged it with hgv=no, since that seems like the closest tag that's actually in use that won't get people in trouble with the law.
mueschel (2024-09-22 12:24:25+00:00): Thanks for the details!
"unless the vehicle is conducting business on Jubilee Avenue" sounds like hgv = destination would be correct. 
For "strange" rules like this I'd prefer to use a conditional tag - even if the particular condition is not understood by current routing engines, they still see that there might be an exception and can display it to the user.

hgv:conditional = yes @ (tyres <= 7)
mf8s003j (2024-09-23 13:34:03+00:00): That's a great idea. I will make that change.
Yukiro (2024-09-26 17:03:20+00:00): Hi, good job contributing to OSM, but there is no need to name roads without names. If you need any advice I'm here to help :)
Frans S (2024-09-23 08:06:25+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping.

B: Overlapping buildings.

C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.

D: Connecting Nodes to other features.

E: Buildings not squared.

F: Buildings partly hidden under trees.

H: Included a yard of clearing.
Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156871753
Frans S (2024-09-23 09:05:16+00:00): Hello. Please solve the issues shown by the issue triangle before you upload your mappings.
Best regards
Jordi MF (2024-09-22 14:49:41+00:00): En este punt existeix un aljub (reservori d'aigua cobert històric). He estat presencialment.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-09-20 17:53:06+00:00): dzięki wielkie za dodanie tego objazdu!
sjodl_ (2024-09-20 17:55:56+00:00): nie ma za co:)
Syl (2024-09-20 21:33:05+00:00): Bonsoir, il est déjà présent un peu plus loin : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11237213314
flohoff (2024-09-22 12:47:22+00:00): Moin,
bist du die Telefone abgefahren? Im März stand dieses Telefon noch:

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=214809725048431

Flo
johnny_1982 (2024-09-22 23:57:03+00:00): Moin,
ja ich bin eine große Runde gefahren. Dieses Telefon stand noch da. Daher habe ich es wieder hinzugefügt (disused). Nicht entfernt. Der allgemeine Abbau geht aber weiter.
Johnny
flohoff (2024-09-23 09:07:34+00:00): 
Ja - nur das massenhafte entfernen ohne zu kontrollieren geht halt nicht. Wie man hier sieht geht das schief. 

Es gibt jede menge locations wo noch dinger stehen.
K2-SO (2024-09-24 08:51:17+00:00): Hallo FKaindl, 
danke für deine Bearbeitung.
Bist du dir sicher, dass die von dir gemappten Reitplätze auch wirklich welche sind? Auf dem NRW Orthophoto sehen die beiden oberen und das rechte für mich eher nach einer Weide aus.
FKaindl (2024-09-24 09:49:11+00:00): Hi K2-SO,
ich war kurz als Besucher dort und soweit ich gesehen habe, ja. Ich schaue die Tage nochmal genauer hin, um sicherzugehen, dass ich mich nicht doch geirrt habe.
K2-SO (2024-09-24 19:05:06+00:00): Alles klar, danke!
Jordi MF (2024-09-22 14:29:41+00:00): ¿Por qué eliminas el nombre oficial en valenciano para añadir de nuevo un nodo en castellano y perdiendo el historial?
ilias_ (2024-09-20 16:43:52+00:00): Never heard of this "proposed railway"....
Neildm01 (2024-09-20 17:49:04+00:00): Same, never heard of it as well. No articles online mentions this proposed underground railway.
ilias_ (2024-09-21 10:36:07+00:00): I think we can just delete it.
os-emmer (2024-09-22 14:38:22+00:00): Hi Derkoenig,
ich habe den eindruck, hier ist etwas bei addr:country=* in die Hose gegangen. Kannst du dir das noch mal angucken? Danke.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394301347
Luzandro (2024-09-26 09:48:25+00:00): Hallo,

dieser Abschnitt der Straße ist tatsächlich - so wie auch vis a vis - mit "Weikersdorfer Platz" angeschrieben und auch die Adressen lauten darauf
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156874430
Christian Weiss 777 (2024-09-26 09:58:58+00:00): Hi, ich habs mit dem Flächenwidmungs- und Bebauungsplan der Gemeinde abgeglichen, sehe aber, dass die Hausnummern 9 bis 11 sich tatsächlich auf den Platz beziehen und nicht auf die Sauerhofstraße. Werds mit der Baubehörde absprechen. Danke für deine Nachricht!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-20 15:51:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198325623

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2025-01-20 19:46:06+00:00): poprawione
Baloo Uriza (2024-09-20 16:30:26+00:00): Yeah, no, these are definitely driveways.  I'm very familiar with this cemetery.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156874825
MajorTC (2024-09-20 16:38:21+00:00): This is the definition of a driveway per OpenStreetMaps: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=driveway
Don't see how these roads would be considered a driveway. Doesn't really apply.
Baloo Uriza (2024-09-20 16:29:48+00:00): Not sure how driveways in a cemetery are "unclassified".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156874863
MajorTC (2024-09-20 16:36:34+00:00): 90% of the national cemeteries have the roads as unclassified roads, and fit the definition as supplied by Open Street Maps. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=unclassified. Not sure how they are driveways, as they don't fit the definition. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=driveway
Filip009 (2024-09-24 17:44:30+00:00): Zdravím, fakt sa tam nedá prejsť z chodníka na cestu? Ten kúsok chodníka, ktorý si vymazal tam bol pravdepodobne kvôli tomu, aby navigácie po ňom mohli navigovať. Takto je ten chodník pre nich slepá cesta.
Filip009 (2024-09-24 17:44:57+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Item:Q17204
ticho2 (2024-09-24 19:13:54+00:00): Hm, asi mas pravdu, neviem ci som to vo Vespucci zle videl, ale pamatam sa ze som ten kusok mazal lebo som to videl ako slepy kusok ktory konci uprostred cesty, a nepokracuje na druhu stranu k tomu chodniku v kopci. Inak by som ho nemazal. Myslel som ze 

Prejst sa tam samozrejme cez cestu da, je to len uzka cesta max. pre jedno auto.

Pridam ten kusok naspat.
Jordi MF (2024-09-22 14:00:47+00:00): La toponimia local oficial es en valenciano. Por tanto, no corresponde quita dicho idioma de la etiqueta "name".
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-20 16:51:00+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/667924947

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-20 17:01:03+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/667925024

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mtmail (2024-09-20 22:32:12+00:00): I tried to translate the opening times. Does "lun9/12 mer ven 14/18" mean "Mo 09:00-12:00; We-Fr 14:00-18:00" ?
Martinligabue (2024-09-20 22:39:12+00:00): Sorry, forgot to fix it, almost correct, if you can do it for me, just thu off, or I'll do it at a later time, thanks
mtmail (2024-09-21 01:18:20+00:00): I made the change. You can review it here https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=Mo%2009%3A00-12%3A00%3B%20We%2CFr%2014%3A00-18%3A00%3B%20Th%2CSa%2CSu%2CPH%20Off&lat=48.7769&lon=9.1844&mode=0&DATE=1726881360000
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-20 17:01:02+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12188638014

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
jacularis (2024-09-20 18:34:41+00:00): cool
InsertUser (2024-09-22 23:44:46+00:00): Why have you deleted or modified places in three different countries and that have existed for several years?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-20 17:21:17+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12188634277
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12188634278

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pawel66031 (2024-09-20 17:26:20+00:00): Dziękuję użytkownikowi Marek-M za zauważenie błędu. Mam nadzieję że nie przegapiłem żadnego nasypu ze zbędnymi oznaczeniami 😅
vasony (2024-09-21 05:13:09+00:00): Reverted your changes, ticket vending machine is not toilet.
gonzoontherun (2024-09-21 08:05:11+00:00): there is a toilet between Kompra Café and the ticket selling point. See the picture

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Kompra+Caf%C3%A9/@46.8894125,17.891249,3a,75y,90t/data=!3m8!1e2!3m6!1sAF1QipOP8fnIGeykflaGw9d6ZKEjSccMmVatImwgT0kF!2e10!3e12!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipOP8fnIGeykflaGw9d6ZKEjSccMmVatImwgT0kF%3Dw114-h86-k-no!7i4000!8i3000!4m7!3m6!1s0x4769bbc1ef3d293f:0x53270208182d5c25!8m2!3d46.8894026!4d17.8912173!10e5!16s%2Fg%2F11kx5v_6q1?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI0MDkxOC4xIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
vasony (2024-09-22 17:26:34+00:00): Toilet is already mapped.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12122681235

please do not change the vending machine back to toilet
GrabMY_ainayusof (2025-01-20 06:43:02+00:00): Hi Branco.

As a local, I believe the node shall be set as no as the gate was locked and only be used during emergency.

Thanks
BrancoRiver (2025-01-23 14:59:12+00:00): Thank you for updating me on the access for this gated entrance to Taman Bayu Puteri. Since you have knowledge of the area I will defer to your revision of access=no. Have a nice day!
rskedgell (2024-09-20 19:20:05+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for editing the map.

Usually addresses are stored in separate tags, which are easier for data consumers like routing software to process.

The person who initially mapped the buildings on the Newlands Estate put all the information into the name tag, which I have now "translated" into OSM tags. You didn't do anything wrong by following the existing mapping style with your edit.

I've also added some other information, like postcodes, to buildings and roads on the estate.

If you want to add more information to the map in your local area, the StreetComplete app is a great complement to the iD web editor which you used.
Langlaeufer (2024-09-21 17:13:30+00:00): Hallo Scy,
Nur zur Sicherheit: Du kennst den Unterschied von gravel und compacted?
Loser Schotter: Scharfkantig gebrochener Naturstein.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156880117
scy83 (2024-09-21 22:12:28+00:00): Danke der Nachfrage. Das mit dem Gravel ist nicht immer einfach, da gebe ich dir recht. Ich bin keiner von den Puristen, für die Schotter zwingend Bahndammdimensionen haben muss, aber andererseits bedeutet compacted für mich, dass man dort zumindest halbwegs mit einem normalen Fahrrad fahren kann. Wenn große Teile des Belags aus 5 cm großen losen Steinen bestehen (sowas hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Gravel_road,_car_in_viewfield_for_scale.jpg), egal ob by design oder weil die feinkörnigere Deckschicht schon wegerodiert ist, finde ich gravel angebracht. Und dann gibt's hier in der Gegend noch jede Menge Feldwege, die vor 50 Jahren mal billig asphaltiert wurden und jetzt irgendwas zwischen "okayer Asphalt", "mehr Schlaglöcher als Straße" und "eigentlich nur noch renaturierter Boden mit vereinzelten Brocken" sind …

Es ist nicht einfach, aber ja, bei den hier getaggten Wegen finde ich das schon überall angebracht. Wie gesagt, trotzdem danke fürs Fragen.
Langlaeufer (2024-09-22 06:00:36+00:00): Alles super  ich meke du bist Profi.
:)
infeeeee (2024-09-23 13:51:43+00:00): Szia!

Erről a pontról írok:
https://osm.org/node/8880142881/

Az url címke használata nem ajánlott:  

> it is advised not to use this tag when more specific alternatives are available 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:url

Ráadásul amit odalinkeltél egy automatikusan létrehozott FB oldal, szerintem ilyeneket felesleges itt tárolni, bárki létrehozhat ilyet, akár véletlenül. Ezt onnan látod, hogy az oldalon szerepel az "Unofficial Page" a név mellett.

Ráadásul ugyanaz a felhasználó ír oda, mint a ki a contact:facebook címkében is szerepel.

Ha több Facebook oldal tartozik egy elemhez, akkor inkább a contact:facebook-ba sorold fel őket pontosvesszővel elválasztva.

Nekiálltam a különböző Facebook url-ek megfelelő címkébe helyezésének, azért tűnt fel ez, hogy ezt már egyszer kitakarítottam. Már nincs sok hátra, ha nem dolgozol ellenem: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1PPz

A Facebook oldal nevének visszacserélése linkre nem baj, de manapság a legtöbb megjelenítő már támogatja pusztán a felhasználónévből való feloldást, JOSM
-ben jobbklikk->Facebook oldal megnyitása simán megérti. Pont az osm.org az egyetlen nagyobb megjelenítő ami nem tudja ezt még linkké alakítani.
Road–Runner (2024-09-27 15:34:48+00:00): Sorry aber disused:amenity=place_of_worship  und amenity=place_of_worship gleichzeitig macht kein Sinn https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/923198943/
EinEngener (2024-10-04 07:53:50+00:00): habs zurückgenommen, es gibt oft das nur building=chapel ohne amenity=place_of_worship gibt und habe aus Affekt gehandelt. Hier habe ich es nicht gesehen das ein disused drin war/ist.
Hungerburg (2024-10-04 11:35:09+00:00): Das kommt davon, wen man sich die Sachen nicht vor Ort anschaut sondern nur danach geht was für tags da gesetzt sind.
pavvv (2024-09-20 19:06:51+00:00): Proszę o bardziej stosowne opisy zmian.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-09-21 18:30:12+00:00): a co jest z nim złego? Dobrze opisuje co w edycji zostało zrobione.

Chyba że sądzisz że warto by dodać też coś typu "a ten kościół ma więcej niż 10 cm" wysokości?
pavvv (2024-09-23 07:39:41+00:00): "Usunięcie błędnej wysokości" lub "Usunięcie błędnego tagu" wystarcza. Kiedy zobaczyłem ten opis w swoim RSS, to myślałem, że określiłeś wysokość amenity=recycle_bin.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-09-23 18:46:48+00:00): a racja, o tym nie pomyślałem