piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gileri (2024-07-02 22:27:00+00:00): Merci pour l'info Syl, mais le bug est toujours présent sur 2 navigateurs Web, 2 connexions internet différentes. On est redirigé là : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/auth/failure?message=csrf_detected&strategy=oauth2_basic

Concernant le nom t'as raison, on n'a pas besoin, car il est amplement documenté en tant que Décathlon Lyon Part-Dieu. Mais le nom d'usage est prioritaire sur la signalisation d'après les coutumes OSM comme tu le sais sûrement. Je me suis dit que peut-etre qu'en écoutant les personnes sur le terrain ça aiderait à trancher la question.
Syl (2024-07-03 06:56:12+00:00): Et en révoquant l'accès dans ton compte OSM (partie "Mes options") puis en réessayant ?

Je n'ai jamais entendu parlé de cette coutume, je met le nom d'usage dans d'autres tags (alt_name, loc_name...). As-tu une source qui en parle ?

Tes modifications vont à l'encontre de ce qui est recommandé dans le wiki et de ce qui est fait par la plupart des personnes.
Pour trancher il ne s'agit pas de connaître quel est le nom que le commerce a envie de mettre en avant ou qui est marqué sur leur site.
Il s'agit de redéfinir notre usage des tags name, brand, branch et official_name pour les commerces.
Pour débloquer la situation il s'agirait de faire une proposition de modification de l'usage des tags qui pourrait servir de base de discussion et amener à une décision.
Sinon j'ai l'impression qu'on va continuer indéfiniment cet échange qui tourne en boucle sans avancer vers une résolution.
Giblet (2023-10-23 20:42:02+00:00): Hi azaaa, I can confirm that this school is not actually a cemetery, a prison, or a walmart. Please reach out if you have questions about editing in OpenStreetMap. I will be reverting these changes.
Giblet (2023-10-23 20:42:08+00:00): Hi azaaa, I can confirm that this school is not actually a cemetery, a prison, or a walmart. Please reach out if you have questions about editing in OpenStreetMap. I will be reverting these changes.
Giblet (2023-10-23 20:42:14+00:00): Hi azaaa, I can confirm that this school is not actually a cemetery, a prison, or a walmart. Please reach out if you have questions about editing in OpenStreetMap. I will be reverting these changes.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-24 03:39:28+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15251
GITNE (2023-09-29 19:17:32+00:00): Na czym polega „poprawa” zmiany drogi dojazdowej/ratunkowej Ignacego Daszyńskiego na ścieżkę (`highway=path`)? Zauważ, że nie znacznikujemy drogi według do czego chcielibyśmy ją używać, lecz czym ona jest i jak jest oznakowana w terenie na miejscu. To, że skupiasz się na kartografowaniu infrastruktury rowerowej i że w jakimś miejscu można fizycznie przejechać rowerem, nie jest powodem aby zmieniać typy dróg. Twoja zmiana doprowadziła do tego, że dla służb ratowniczych lub dostawców docierających pojazdami trasa nie będzie prawidłowo wytyczona. Proszę zachowuj szczególną ostrożność przy zmianie typu drogi. Sprawdź typ drogi na miejscu i w najlepszym przypadku udowodnij powód do zmiany. Jeśli droga jest oznaczona znakiem drogowym `PL:B-1`, nie czyni to ją automatycznie `highway=path`. Znak `PL:B-1` wyklucza ruch rowerowy, bez względu na to czy nam się to podoba czy nie, czy można fizycznie przejechać rowerem czy nie. Jeśli chcesz w takich miejscach umożliwić wytyczanie trasy rowerem to używaj `bicycle=dismount` zamiast zmieniać typ drogi.
tsp15 (2023-10-01 19:15:09+00:00): Kierowałem się tym co widziałem będąc na miejscu w terenie. Na wjeździe na drogę stoi znak B-1. Według instrukcji z wiki: "Jeśli wąska ulica jest zabroniona dla pojazdów silnikowych, rozważ użycie highway=footway lub highway=pedestrian." - więc racja "path" nie jest dobrym wyborem, powinienem był dać "footway", lub "pedestrian". Moim celem nie było również umożliwienie wytyczania trasy rowerowej - wręcz przeciwnie, stąd dodany przeze mnie tag "vehicle=no".
Carto'Cité (2024-01-04 12:07:40+00:00): J'ai modifié ça (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44955038) en « piste » sur trottoir suite à ta note.
Charles
josmougn (2024-01-08 14:35:08+00:00): Merci. Endroit à surveiller, ça devrait bouger d'ici peu (je ne sais pas quand).
Je n'arriverai jamais à me faire à l'idée de combiner footway (exclusivement piéton) à bicycle=designated !
José
bernardo60 (2023-09-23 00:17:45+00:00): Thanks for contributing to OSM. The concept of "Living Street" does not exist in Indonesia, where pedestrians have priority to cars. If it is too narrow for cars to pass ("gang" in Indonesia), consider using highway=path, or wide enough for a car, highway=service=alley. Look at the examples here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=alley
martinmbaihaqi (2023-09-24 01:48:03+00:00): This is used to describe roads exist in Indonesia https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Id:Map_Features:highway
ikopanjirukmana (2023-09-25 00:15:14+00:00): sorry for joining the chat, agree with martinmbaihaqi. living street use in Indonesia for Small roads in residential areas. The road width is between 1.5 - 2 meters. Can be passed by 1 car at low speed.
For alley or "gang" that can only be passed by motorcycles (< 1.5 meters) can use highway = path

another reference for indonesia tagging guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Id:Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines
bernardo60 (2023-09-25 08:19:52+00:00): Thanks for your input. I initiated a discussion regarding "living street", please look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines. As per Wiki, "A general feature of this a "living street" is, that the legislation either grants pedestrians the right of way over or at equal rights to other road users". This is not the case in Indonesia. Have a look at the sample pictures for living street, they are very different from the "gang" here in Indonesia. "Living streets" have nothing to do with width, but legislation. But look at the sample pictures of an alley, that fits the "gang" so much better. An alley is more defined by width, just like an Indonesian "gang". What do you think? Why don't you join the discussion on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines?
martinmbaihaqi (2023-09-25 10:35:18+00:00): Please refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indonesia. Here are some tagging conventions for Indonesia
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-28 06:39:02+00:00): Are you sure this gazebo is here ?

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/458306694
dannmer (2024-03-05 10:10:19+00:00): When you added a gazebo recently you converted an intramural sports field into a gazebo. Has the field been entirely replaced by the gazebo? Or is it on the side of the field
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-07 15:39:51+00:00): restore pitch tagging - this does not look like a correct edit at all, user does not respond, that was their first edit. Though lines do not look like on soccer pitch so not not restoring sport=soccer here

maybe it would be useful to review other edits they made
jdiddid (2023-10-01 23:38:59+00:00): This road construction is not yet finished, and is still entirely closed. I'm going to revert this.
jdiddid (2023-10-02 13:29:55+00:00): Just to fully sanity check, this morning, I went and surveyed and can confirm the road is closed with barriers, still torn up and has no surface. I checked intersections at Madison, Clear Lake Blvd, and Hoelocker and confirmed the road status at each. I go past the road each day, I'll make sure it's marked open as soon as construction is complete.
SamMappingEdits (2023-10-02 13:40:15+00:00): Thanks for double checking. I am not sure why the client asked me to make the road as open. I tried to double check online, but she also lives in town, hence why I trusted this information. Thanks for fixing it
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-01 07:25:11+00:00): access=private refers to whether the public can access it not ownership. access=permissive is the correct tag.
yallasan (2024-06-13 12:04:44+00:00): Hi,
I apologize for the delayed response. Thank you for reviewing my changeset and highlighting the issue. I regret the incorrect addition of the access tag and have reverted the edit in changeset #152630600. Thanks for your support. I'm looking forward to learning more from you.

Regards,
yallasan
Herman Lee (2023-09-24 07:10:39+00:00): 你好，你的几个更改可能破坏了现有的公交线路关系，请注意，谢谢。
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-09-22 22:06:07+00:00): ¿Por qué eliminaste el nombre de los lugares aquí?
empty_child (2023-09-22 20:31:36+00:00): Исабалиев Давид, прекратите портить названия населенных пунктов в Грузии
Tomas_J (2023-09-25 01:45:30+00:00): Ahoj, 

žiadal si vykonať kontrolu tejto sady zmien. Za mňa výborne, mám iba jednu poznámku k názvu: názov by malo byť oficiálne meno uvedené na studničke alebo v dokumentoch, nie všeobecný popis. V mape je studnička dostatočne popísaná typom objektu (spring). Vymaž, prosim, tag name, ak toto nie je oficiálny názov. 

Ďakujem že si sa zapojil do mapovania.  

Tomáš J.
bubozvihorlatu (2023-09-25 18:35:55+00:00): Ahoj Tomáš. Ďakujem za pochvalu aj upozornenie. Prepíšem názvy tak, ako si myslím že by mali byť aj po gramatickej stránke správne. Názov-meno vždy konzultujem s lesníkmi. Pretože nie vždy prameň-studnička má historické meno, pomenovanie niekedy pripomína ,,všeobecný popis´´. S pozdravom Bubo
Tomas_J (2023-09-25 19:10:42+00:00): Ďakujem, a mapuj ďalej - každý záznam , ktorý vylepší mapu môže niekomu pomôcť a zmeny sa po čase prepisujú aj do mapy cz, ktoré asi používa väčšina ľudí.
seattlefyi (2023-09-23 00:31:01+00:00): Hi, thanks for the interest in OSM -- however, it looks like you accidentally dragged some objects and then uploaded them! I've changed them back. Please double-check your edits before committing them. Thanks!
kapazao (2023-09-23 16:51:57+00:00): Hola, por favor no se te olvide reposicionar los elementos que has creado con las capas de Catastro o el ráster de IGN a imágenes PNOA, que sino se quedan descolocados.
Buen trabajo por la zona de Motril ;)
Un saludo y gracias por tus contribuciones.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141616283
WoodWoseWulf (2023-09-24 00:26:59+00:00): Hi Aster - you've left an unnamed park node here - was that supposed to be removed?
felipeeugenio (2023-09-22 23:55:13+00:00): Hola Gustavo. CUando se hará el pique? porque al parecer ahora siguen los juegos ahí.
Por favor responder a la nota https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3903355.
gracias
eggie (2025-01-20 15:44:19+00:00): Alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
felipeeugenio (2023-09-23 12:24:14+00:00): pfff... thank you.
what a typo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141617445
rskedgell (2023-10-25 11:36:58+00:00): You appear to have tagged a section of the roundabout at the junction of Ruislip Road East and Argyle Road as foot=no in response to a StreetComplete task asking "Are pedestrians forbidden to walk on this road here?"

I'm trying to find any evidence in Bing Streetside imagery that there really is a (signed) pedestrian prohibition here. I cannot see any TSRGD diagram 625.1 "pedestrians prohibited" signs on the imagery, so do not believe that a prohibition exists. Is this a new signed restriction created by a traffic order more recent than the Bing streetside imagery?

The wiki states that access tags reflect legal access, not whether it would be pleasant, a good idea, safe, etc.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot

As real pedestrian prohibitions on public roads other than those tagged as highway=motorway or motorroad=yes in the UK are quite rare and are always signed, this quest is probably better left disabled.
swise (2023-10-27 12:31:50+00:00): Hello, I surveyed this in person. I can go back and confirm again in person, but unfortunately not immediately. In the meantime, probably better to close it.
oba510 (2023-09-24 05:16:49+00:00): Hi joeeeew, 
What's the deal with these two hardware stores you added on what look like ordinary houses? One of them is tagged as a Home Depot...
joeeeew (2023-09-25 16:17:48+00:00): Hello, I was trying to update to match google maps. they are design and contractor stores. If you look on google maps, they are there. I wasn't sure what tag to use , so I copied over the store tag from other locations to make the edits. If you think there are better tags, you can make the update? Thank you!
Allison P (2023-09-25 21:14:01+00:00): You cannot copy from other maps unless you have permission or copyright.

Even if Google Maps were an acceptable source, it is of poor quality. It has many spam and fake entries in addition to inaccurate information.
YomanNH (2023-09-28 10:39:48+00:00): Cześć,
jeśli droga https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/952802471 jest przejezdna (co wynika z motor_vehicle=yes), to lepiej byłoby ją oznaczyć jako highway=tertiary i construction=minor. Dodatkowo, motor_vehicle=yes trochę sugeruje, że nie ma przejazdu przykładowo dla rowerów. Na pewno tak jest?

Pozdrawiam
Mathias_ADAV (2023-10-17 12:22:24+00:00): Bonjour,
concernant le champs width, il faut l'indiquer de la manière suivante 1.5 et non 1,5m, je vous laisse consulter l’article du wiki en question :  

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:width?uselang=fr

Bon mapping !

Mathias
Mathieu Boniface (2023-10-18 21:14:19+00:00): Bien merci Mathias pour la ressource et la correction
dipeshraichura (2023-09-22 19:26:08+00:00): Sorry i forgot mark this task building needs reviewing
literan (2023-09-23 10:53:31+00:00): во второй раз вы сломали мультиполигон строительной площадки.

остановитесь
Smiledj (2023-09-23 11:08:04+00:00): Я вроде ну этом участке только удалил надпись школа, без корректировки полигонов
literan (2023-09-24 09:09:59+00:00): нет, вы удалили линии, входящие в мультиполигон стройки, и это видно на этой самой странице - видите внизу зачеркнутые номера линий?
irik (2023-09-23 07:56:09+00:00): Kępa to popularne określenie na górkę, mamy jeszcze co najmniej jedną Kępę w Łaziskach, a podobnych błędów w PRNG jest więcej, choćby wzgórze Galgenberg jest opisane jako "las". Oczywiście nasza Kępa jest charakterystyczna, wyróżnia się na okolicznym tle, dlatego służy do zjazdów rowerowych.
gscscnd (2023-09-25 12:02:32+00:00): name=Kępa+source:name=PRNG dla lasu, name=Kępa (bez source*=PRNG, jako wiedza lokalsów) dla górki — może być?
gscscnd (2023-09-25 12:03:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3903642
literan (2023-09-23 10:52:56+00:00): Тег name - для имен собственных "Очистные сооружения" это не имя собственное, это задается тегами - и все верные теги уже стоят на соответствующем мультиполигоне https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11095628

man_made=wastewater_plant
infeeeee (2023-09-26 09:31:17+00:00): Szia!

Hogyan hoztad létre ezeket az új útszakaszokat? Mert az átmenő összes buszvonalat elvágtad valahogy. JOSM-ben, ha kijelölöd az utat és egy pontját, majd P-t nyomsz, akkor úgy vágja szét a kijelölt pontnál, hogy a buszok megmaradnak mindkét új úton. Szóval csak kíváncsi vagyok hogy sikerült ez, iD-s szerkesztők szoktak ilyet csinálni.

A másik, ami fontosabb, megjavítod ezeket, vagy megjavítsam? 422, 424, 436, 437 buszjáratok érintettek: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=19.53975&lat=47.78397&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes

További jó térképezést!
gwythyr622 (2023-09-26 20:16:36+00:00): Szervusz!

Arra tippelnék, hogy a JOSM-ben amikor sima node kiválasztásos vágás volt (nem volt keresztező vonal, így nem kellett külön kiválasztani a vágandó vonalat, és azon a konkrét vágási node-ot), akkor ez nem aszerint, a relation-t megőrizve vágott, mint amit írtál.

Elnézést a problémáért, a jövőben erre jobban figyelek. 

Mivel a hibát én okoztam, úgy tisztességes, ha a javításban is részt veszek. Mihelyt lesz rá kapacitásom a héten, hozzálátok a relation-ök kijavításához.
literan (2023-09-23 10:49:45+00:00): зачем две пятерочки добавили? не торопитесь
Smiledj (2023-09-23 11:06:03+00:00): Одна же вроде… второй это верный…
literan (2023-09-24 09:09:05+00:00): вот посмотрите же на этой самой странице https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141619818

внизу две пятерочки с v1

одну поставили на контур здания, вторую - точкой
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2023-11-03 01:55:02+00:00): Hello Tom Lee.
Can you attach the request?
In my opinion the name refers to a local name used as a reference for the inhabitants of the area.
I understand that it may conflict with European data protection legislation but if it were possible to access such a request it would be easier to verify the deletion.
Thank you!
felipeeugenio (2023-09-22 21:09:42+00:00): Hola. gracias por las ediciones. Son muy útiles.
pero max=30 en una bomba de bencina?
Hay alguna señalética verificable en terreno?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141620033
gscscnd (2023-09-23 07:29:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3092218690/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11210940666
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10578904522/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11210940671
Tutaj ma to nieduże znaczenie, ale ogólnie:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Andrea Musuruane (2023-09-24 06:57:34+00:00): Please do not use the name tag to make notes. Moreover I really doubt that the other viewpoints have such names.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141620211
literan (2023-09-23 10:47:25+00:00): ну вы здесь и наделали всего тяп-ляп, еще сверху, еще.

остановитесь, пожалуйста. Поизучайте туториалы (есть ссылки у меня в профиле). Пока выглядит, что вы хаотично нажимаете все кнопки подряд.

Исправлю
gscholz (2023-09-24 06:07:22+00:00): Hi Daniel,
this changeset has created several errors regarding self intersecting ways and displaced streets:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-74.08384&lat=4.62583&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141620475

I have reverted it to fix those issues.
Guido
martinst (2023-09-23 03:19:56+00:00): Ich meine layer=-1 bei Way 1125843032 macht keinen Sinn.
chris210990 (2023-09-23 13:34:49+00:00): Hast du natürlich recht. Habe es wieder rückgängig gemacht :D
Awoobis (2023-09-22 20:19:59+00:00): źródło https://placowki.poczta-polska.pl/#
Oskarst_ (2025-05-06 11:54:47+00:00): Hei,

Er fengsel riktig tag for et slikt formål? Videre ser det ut til at det er Arups gate 3 som er overgangsboliger, ikke Arups gate 4.
gormur (2026-05-14 17:50:34+00:00): Er dette det samme som i Oslo gate 35? Kanskje den har flyttet? https://www.kriminalomsorgen.no/oslo-overgangsbolig-gamlebyen-avdeling.5025025-237612.html
empty_child (2023-09-22 20:30:27+00:00): Stop corrupt map data
Frans S (2023-09-24 08:34:27+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
Your mappings here are great !
A few remarks.
Please use the tag 'highway=residential rather than living_street.  The latter is a more special use of a street, f.i only accessible for locals. Limited access for cars etc.
And, don't connect nodes of buildings to each other. 
Best regards
ediyes (2023-10-13 13:43:53+00:00): Thanks for your comment, I will review it and improve.
user_5359 (2023-09-27 06:58:52+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1210153124 (one of four objects). What is the mean of (foreign) tags
CODE_HYDRO = 05C0000002000839078
DATE_CREAT = 2017-01-24 16:06:18
DATE_MAJ = 2022-10-04 21:28:27
ID = COURDEAU0000002000839078
IMPORTANCE = 5
STATUT = Validé
STATUT_TOP = Validé
TOPONYME = Ruisseau de Pourcassès
?
fredoh (2023-09-27 16:08:26+00:00): I used the DB TOPO hydro from IGN to add this watercourse, these tags were in the IGN database.

Do you think I had to delete them ?
eggie (2023-10-09 20:55:47+00:00): Zoiets doen we met conditionaltagging
BV access:conditional=no @ (2023 Sep 20-2024 Apr 3)
eggie (2023-10-09 21:20:50+00:00): Aangepast met access:conditional=no @ (2023 Oct 16-2023 Dec 22)
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-10-09 21:22:55+00:00): Route is stuk... Maar dat was wellicht al.
citrula (2023-09-25 22:58:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For Addresses, please use the expanded version of the street name (in this case it would presumably be North Grand Street)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141622995
Strubbl (2023-09-26 22:12:36+00:00): Bitte auch hier nicht das name-Feld für Beschreibungen missbrauchen. Es gibt noch den key ref, wo man Referenznummern hinterlegen kann, siehe Doku im Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:ref

Ich habe das mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141793773 mal geändert.

Gebäude kannst du rechtwinklig zeichnen, in dem du das Gebäude markierst und die Taste Q auf der Tastatur drückst.
IlBano (2023-11-21 16:38:50+00:00): Ciao Max.
Potresti fare un check sul civico che hai inserito con questo nodo ? (nome e numero non coerenti con il resto).

Ciao

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11211105656#map=19/44.99249/9.00370
Max1234-ITA (2023-11-22 09:23:01+00:00): Ciao,
quella è una situazione un po'strana.

Quel tratto di Via Don Minzoni si chiamava Via Carlo Alberto Sacchi fino a qulche anno fa.

Poi il comune ha deciso di cambiare, ed ha intitolato allo stesso personaggio (forse per dargli più importanza) una piazzetta, poco distante (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1100550078)

Quel civico 6 di Via Sacchi l'ho trovato in un survey, credo sia l'unica piastrella rimasta della vecchia numerazione.
IlBano (2023-11-22 11:45:11+00:00): Ok chiaro. Quindi il 4b è il nuovo 10 e il 6 il nuovo 12 e le vecchie placchette non sono state rimosse.

Ciao
Max1234-ITA (2023-11-22 14:16:46+00:00): Esatto. Credo sia andata così.

BTW, non è raro che le vecchie placchette non siano rimosse, ma negli altri casi ho sempre visto particolari che facevano chiaramente intendere una vecchia numerazione (tipo piastrelle coi bordi smussati, oppure cornicette blu-Savoia :-), o numeri con tipo di carattere diverso), qui invece sono proprio identiche.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-22 22:00:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1446941576
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3863057023
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387702078
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387701817

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Metzor (2023-09-23 15:29:37+00:00): Hi elle017,

Welcome to OSM!

Why do you place an ice cream shop directly on the road?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11211150437#map=19/49.72282/-54.16884

Don't tag the same thing twice: Split Rock is already there, see:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11211150537#map=19/49.64746/-54.77006

Furthermore, please keep your changesets local. More help on that see:
section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Please fix the first two issues and I appreciate if you consider the third point for further commits.

Thanks and happy mapping!
MxxCon (2023-10-02 04:58:33+00:00): many sidewalks here have been tagged as crossing 😱 Fixed in 142000761
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141623887
Baloo Uriza (2023-09-22 23:45:45+00:00): addr:street should probably have "North Interstate 35 Service Road".  We don't do abbreviations in name data.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141624052
Bobropiton (2023-09-25 19:12:31+00:00): А зачем на автобусные остановки было вешать railway=halt?