piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MarcoR (2023-02-22 17:34:38+00:00): Benvenuti su OpenStreetMap!
Prima di inserire dati non corretti nel database vi consiglierei di sfogliare la Wiki del progetto e nel caso chiedere aiuto alla comunità italiana mediante uno dei canali presenti su https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Contact

Nel caso specifico, visto che non ci sono parchi pubblici in Piazza della Repubblica a Livorno, potreste indicare che cosa fa la colonnina che avete inserito? Se si tratta di un defibrillatore forse il modo più corretto di mapparlo sarebbe di quello di usare emergency=defibrillator (si veda a tal scopo https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:emergency%3Ddefibrillator)

Buon mapping,
Marco.
Pradella Sistemi Srl (2023-05-30 09:05:36+00:00): Buongiorno Marco,
grazie per le segnalazioni. Abbiamo preso in mano da poco l'attività di censimento delle nostre colonnine di ricarica. Stiamo prendendo in considerazione i vostri commenti per rispettare le linee guida.
euroPathfinder (2023-02-22 21:20:22+00:00): Hi D!nk,
Willkommen bei OSM und vielen Dank für Deinen Beitrag. Hier noch ein nützlicher Tipp für künftige Edits: durch Drücken der Taste Q bei aktiver Auswahl des Gebäudes wird die Form automatisch rechtwinklig gemacht, was idR. auf alle Häuser zutrifft. Viel Spaß weiterhin beim Mappen und bei Fragen gerne einfach melden! :)

Beste Grüße
euroPathfinder
D!nk (2023-02-23 17:04:35+00:00): Das ist ein sehr guter Tipp, ich bedanke mich ganz herzlich!

Grüße :)
euroPathfinder (2023-02-24 06:23:17+00:00): Klar, sehr gerne :) Es gibt auch noch einige andere Tastenkombinationen die hilfreich sind, zB.

- m für move = Form translatorisch verschieben
- r für rotate = Form rotieren
- o für.. Keine Ahnung ehrlich gesagt, aber damit kann man Kreise erzeugen 

Das sind so ein paar Kniffe die das Mappen deutlich vereinfachen.

Gruß
amadvance (2023-02-22 18:12:05+00:00): Ciao Pradella Sistemi Srl,

La mappatura delle colonnine che avete fatto è da sistemare.

Essendo colonnine non si devono marcare come leisure=park che rappresenta un parco. Si devono invece marcare con un attributo che rappresenta la funzione della colonnina.

Ad esempio potrebbe essere: emergency=defibrillator o amenity=charging_station

Il campo name=  si mette solo è un nome proprio, come un nome di Via. Il nome "Colonnina" è troppo generico ed è da togliere.

Inoltre, per il seriale, è meglio il campo ref= adatto a questi scopi.

Se necessitate di chiarimenti, chiedete pure.

Ciao,
Andrea
Pradella Sistemi Srl (2023-05-30 09:06:48+00:00): Buongiorno Andrea,
grazie per le segnalazioni. Abbiamo preso in mano da poco l'attività di censimento delle nostre colonnine di ricarica. Stiamo prendendo in considerazione i vostri commenti per rispettare le linee guida.
Ale_Zena_IT (2023-02-22 17:28:14+00:00): Hello,
it would be great trying to limit the extension of the changesets: I was monitoring activities in Somalia and came across with this one.

Also, I wondering the meaning of some large polygons in different Countries without any tag.

Alessandro
luca sski (2023-02-22 22:31:22+00:00): I'm a bit confused about the untagged ways (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148541379, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148541378, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148541377, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148541376, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148541375, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148541374, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148541373, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148541372, etc.).

Also, this part of the maps seems to be completely fucked up: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14442220#map=9/-2.2228/20.8795
Stewered (2023-02-23 12:36:27+00:00): Most maps will have the five following things: a Title, a Legend, a Grid, a Compass Rose to indicate direction, and a Scale.
https://www.unilightled.com/fine-pixel-pitch-led/
yasslay (2023-02-23 13:04:16+00:00): @luca sski

The untagged ways are a part of the relation which you sent, which renders everything inside the untagged ways as a wooded area. I'm not sure as to why Wulfmorn did not use separate ways and areas for this, though. Multiple untagged ways and a relation seem unnecessary for something which could be done in multiple areas.
Wulfmorn (2023-02-24 20:14:16+00:00): Oh my. I must have downloaded the area in a layer with some nonsense in it. So sorry. Please revert. :O

Sorry I didn't see the message until now.
Wulfmorn (2023-02-24 20:16:11+00:00): Actually, I may have done some actual stuff in the edit. Those untagged polygons were not meant to be in it. I'll try to clean up now. So sorry - very sloppy of me.
Wulfmorn (2023-02-24 20:38:42+00:00): I've removed the empty polygons.

Regarding relation 14442220, I didnt create it that way, but I cleaned it up by separating it into two separate relations.

> "Multiple untagged ways and a relation seem unnecessary for something which could be done in multiple areas."

The old polygon was not very accurate. New geometry required a hole in the wood polygon. Inner members are the best way to do this.

Thanks guys for noticing these issues.
samirr21 (2023-04-04 10:51:50+00:00): سلام وقت بخیر لطفا نام آیت الله رو تغییر ندهید
gscholz (2023-02-23 08:04:57+00:00): Hi abebayehuz,
please educate yourself about how to upload gps tracks properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Convert_GPS_tracks

Kind regards
Guido
Jany48 (2023-03-01 18:56:57+00:00): Infitter, kedy konečne prestaneš pomenúvať lesné cesty a cyklotrasy názvami značených trás, ktoré sú už obsiahnuté v reláciach ?! Nielen, že sa vytvárajú duplicity (viď. https://www.freemap.sk/#map=17/48.986297/21.194247&layers=X), ale je to aj blud, lebo to nie sú ich vlastné názvy, ako sú názvy ulíc v mestách. Tá lesná asfaltka sa určite nevolá "Náučný chodník Stredná lesnícka škola Prešov". Už som to raz po tebe opravoval a teraz musím zase. Aj iní ti písali pri jednom changesete, že by si sa mal poučovať zo svojich chýb a neopakovať ich.
tux67 (2023-02-22 15:13:10+00:00): Hi adscan,
could you please quickly explain with which mission you're making your changes?

BR
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132884915
gscholz (2023-02-28 07:41:52+00:00): Hi evgenykatyshev,
your recent edits have left behind a lot of errors regarding not connected ways (red dots):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=28.68448&lat=38.54706&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132885002

As you may know, this ways can not be used by routing software . Can you please fix this? As this seems to be a systematical error, can you please check how to avoid this in future? Hint: Have a look at the warnings this changeset shows.

Kind regards
Guido
mueschel (2023-03-06 17:29:08+00:00): Hi,
you added 'fef' tags here on two post_box. Could you check / fix this?
algot (2023-04-05 23:50:36+00:00): Її не перейменували ще
https://dnepr.info/uk/news/u-miskradi-dnipra-poyasnyly-chomu-dosi-ne-perejmenuvaly-vulytsyu-marshala-malynovskogo/
Ihor Vusyk (2023-04-06 05:34:33+00:00): От трясьця :(
Дякую!
Carto'Cité (2023-03-24 08:01:39+00:00): Bonjour Furdrien,
Sur ces voies bus partagées avec les cyclistes : 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34147681
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148545208
a priori le cycleway:right=share_busway est faux car la combinaison highway=service + access=no + psv=designated + bicycle=designated implique qu'il s'agit de voie bus partagée. 
cycleway:right=share_busway est à utiliser avec un busway:right=lane par exemple.
Je me permets de corriger dans ce sens mais n'hésite pas à me dire si je passe à côté de quelque chose.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Furdrien (2023-03-24 19:29:30+00:00): Salut Charles !

Merci de ta vigilance, 
Pour créé les segments, j'avais repris les "anciens" segments qui avait ces tag :/ sans y faire attention 
Merci pour ta vigilance !
je ferais plus attention !

Furdrien
Carto'Cité (2023-03-27 09:29:12+00:00): Avec plaisir ! Merci pour tes contributions !
Charles
skquinn (2023-02-23 05:23:45+00:00): Hi,

Driveways should be left in the database as highway=service and service=driveway, not deleted. There are users of OSM data that use this information and many mappers (employed by Amazon, Lyft, etc) specifically add driveways/service roads.
Allison P (2023-02-24 17:25:24+00:00): It it really an old name? In my experience, the TIGER names often exist, but are on the wrong road. Whatever the case, it seems unlikely that this ever had a name.
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
eggie (2023-02-22 16:03:57+00:00): Dag Henk... Het lastige is dat je geen wegen kunt opknippen of bewerken waar een wandelroute over loppt. De routerelatie is nu stuk.
Op een G7 pad is het niet gebruikelijk om bicycle=dismount te taggen.
Je mag immers altijd met de fiets aan de hand ergens lopen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-22 16:09:20+00:00): Twee knooppunt-wandelroutes hersteld... accesstags aangepast. Geen bicycle=no taggen op wandelpaden. Die routeren per default al niet in osm.
MVG
eggie
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
JezCrow (2023-02-22 23:53:58+00:00): B&M was still open when I passed this morning - or was today the last day?
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Romwriter (2023-02-25 16:06:07+00:00): rückgängig gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133011740
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
rarad74 (2023-02-22 15:29:47+00:00): Salut. Scriem si noi corect in Limba Română?
Dodko (2023-02-24 08:49:13+00:00): Podľa Ortofotomozaika SR by sa dala zakresliť tá garáž 59. Predpokladám že tá dostane súpisné číslo.
aTarom (2023-02-22 19:32:19+00:00): Hola, editeu com a institució o a títol personal?
Sembla que teniu alguna dificultat amb l'etiquetatge, com per exemple afegir informació en l'element que forma el multipoligon
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/577233998/history
i no en la relació que forma la geometria de l'edifici.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8186474/history
En aquest espai de missatges no és molt adequat per a explicar amb millor detall, que et sembla si et passes pel canal de la comunitat i allà en poder adjuntar captures de pantalla, per exemple, és més fàcil d'explicar.
El canal de Telegram
@osmcat
ó
el fòrum
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/lang-ca/69
Salutacions i gràcies per participar
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Đuro Jiří (2023-02-22 15:38:00+00:00): * dodao nove ceste i parkiralište
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Andrea Musuruane (2023-02-23 14:21:14+00:00): Ciao. Non e' corretto inserire il nome delle strade provinciali nel tag name delle way. Questi vanno inseriti nel tag name delle relazioni relative alle strade provinciali. Ad es: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1761765 Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132887890
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
dgitto (2023-02-22 16:43:32+00:00): benvenuto in OSM
OPENER next (2023-02-23 13:07:43+00:00): I agree that the situation is not easy. However currently it looks like the cars are only driving next to the tram for a short portion of the street while actually they can drive the whole time next to the tram except on the tram stop "Trachau". The street is just usually full of parked cars so they have to drive at the tram way. I wouldn't add this extra lane, it just makes things complicated. After all the street already denotes this with the tag "lanes = 3" also the number of lanes is reduced near the tram stop. So in my eyes everything was correct here.
nam0 (2023-02-23 14:35:13+00:00): Yes, this was it how I remember from my last visit there. 
If you know it better from a more current date feel free to correct it
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
algot (2023-04-23 16:14:56+00:00): А вулиця Посполита хіба одностороння?
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Frans S (2023-04-12 09:27:57+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator during the validation process. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Clustered buildings.
Squared buildings
Inaccurate mapping.
Overlapping buildings



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132888426
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].