piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Drungus (2026-04-08 19:57:07+00:00): Thank you! I did not notice the path coming from Brīvības iela. I reverted this edit: changeset/181067620
HellMap (2026-04-09 10:02:00+00:00): Looking at latest aerial (Bing), it seems that this path is gone or very rarely used https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1177100639. May be some of the fences around 160B have been repaired or something. I would probably consider removing this section altogether since it's basically just overgrowing grass indistinguishable from the rest. The original edit suggests this is one of those "hole in fence" paths. OSM doesn't generally map paths like this unless they are clearly identifiable.
HellMap (2026-04-10 16:23:31+00:00): I surveyed the location. The west path is basically non-existant - I could not tell it apart from just grass - you would basically be walking through bushes and old fences. Regardless, the westmost fence by the service road is now repaired/closed, so you would have to enter by private gate/driveway and it doesn't look like anyone is seriously using it. North path is accessible and there aren't any barriers except an annoying kerb. Eastmost locked gates signage makes it pretty clear it's private courtyard access. So technically you can get to the east courtyard via the north path, but you are just entering a private courtyard through a roundabout way via some old destroyed gates and fences. I tagged west courtyard features as private and left paths in the meadow as public.
richlv (2026-04-11 01:06:32+00:00): ...east courtyard perhaps?
NeisBot (2026-04-08 13:45:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 21 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/702377509 v24 | 21 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5268387061 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181050575
Wildsharky (2026-04-13 11:42:50+00:00):  Reverted in changeset id:181087358
Vighnajith (2026-04-16 05:22:13+00:00): #GWUGeog
旧加卷 (2026-04-09 06:02:51+00:00): Could you explain the reason for removing the wikidata=* tags and for changing the Wikipedia article language to English?
NeisBot (2026-04-08 14:06:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13288039299 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Barbershop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-16 16:33:09+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181422546
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
dp7 (2026-04-08 16:13:25+00:00): Ciao Nicola CCN, benvenuto su Openstreetmap e grazie per il tuo contributo. Per favore, utilizza dei commenti che si riferiscano alle modifiche effettuate, piuttosto che un generico "ok". Grazie !
Les lampadaires (2026-04-08 15:03:57+00:00): #mapcampus_ScPoBx2026
NeisBot (2026-04-08 14:36:17+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, Zoary.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added path"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
Ltrlg (2026-04-17 11:07:53+00:00): Les horaires indiqués sont-ils toujours corrects ? Comme ils datent de 2022 dans d’anciens locaux (changeset/127200905) et https://www.loire-authion.fr/contacts/latelier-de-justine/ en donne d’autres, j’ai tendance à penser que ce n’est plus le cas.
blaurent49 (2026-04-27 14:03:54+00:00): Bonjour, pour être honnête, je n'avais pas vérifié et donc pas modifié les horaires. Ceux cités sur le site de Loire-Authion semblent être bons. Ils sont cohérents avec ceux affichés sur la vitrine. Merci de votre retour.
Ltrlg (2026-04-29 06:00:41+00:00): Super, merci 🙏
hertipau (2026-06-15 12:49:09+00:00): Hallo Gerhard42,
beim Überprüfen von Hausnummern in Bochum ist mir aufgefallen, dass du hier  building:levels 2.7 eingetragen hast. Das kenne ich so noch nicht, was heißt das? An dem Gebäude sind auch noch andere schräge building:levels mit z.B. 1.3. 
Zudem sind hier die Hausnummer doppelt vergeben. Einmal am gesamten Gebäude (138-138). Und dann nochmal an den Eingängen.

Gruß, Herb
Gerhard42 (2026-06-15 18:32:33+00:00): Hi,
Das sind krumme Etagenhöhen um passende Höhen zu bewirken. Man könnte das auch in Metern darstellen. So weit ich weiß entspricht ein Level 3m. 
Das ist mein Elternhaus+Nachbar.
Wir haben dort versucht eine korrekte Darstellung als 3d Gebäude zu erreichen. 
Die Hausnummern lösche ich am Gebäude 
LG
Gerd
hertipau (2026-06-16 02:32:23+00:00): Hallo Gerd,
danke für deine schnelle Antwort. building:levels gibt ja nur die Anzahl der oberirdischen Geschossen (ohne Dach). Wenn du die Höhe des Gebäudes oder der Gebäueteile angegeben willst, bietet sich height an.
beste Grüße
Herb
iandees (2026-04-08 15:17:33+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11805011206, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13495363889 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181055497, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Wildsharky (2026-04-13 11:52:28+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181127314
MappingMore (2026-04-09 11:14:37+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181091521
bxl-forever (2026-04-08 16:06:38+00:00): Hello, IMCPlatform.

Addresses are for buildings or doors.  We have worked hard to keep the address system clean in Brussels and get rid of all bad duplicates.

Please do not transform charging stations onto addresses, in particular if they are duplicating existing addresses.  A charging station is not a place that can get mail.

OSM is a geographical database, the system works by design to get the nearest address of any object without having to write the address explicitely on it.

As a last resort, you can use "object:street" and "object:housenumber" if you are desperate about having an address on the object itself, instead of damaging the "addr:*" scheme.

Thanks.
marc__marc (2026-04-09 06:14:32+00:00): Par ailleurs que signifie "Fauteuil roulant manuel" ?
c'est que pour les fauteuil manuel ? si oui je me demande bien qu'est-ce qui empêche un fauteuil roulant électrique.
c'est la borne qui nécessite une intervention manuelle ? si oui c'est le cas de nombreuses bornes voire toute.
Par ailleurs la place pour la voiture n'étant pas ou peu accessible en chaise, je vois mal comment la station pourrait l'être, d'autant qu'il faut se rendre sur le trottoir et que le passage piéton le plus proche est mal accessible lui aussi au niveau de la bordure
NeisBot (2026-04-08 14:45:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13556395209 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Medspa building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-08 16:33:27+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 13:49:05+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values

https://osm.org/changeset/184915477
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 09:26:14+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, possibly sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184127676

https://osm.org/changeset/184127676
NeisBot (2026-04-08 14:48:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13556651556 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Lawn equipment store"

#MapWithoutSpam
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 13:48:27+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values

https://osm.org/changeset/184915440
CYKL BIKES (2026-04-08 14:51:01+00:00): MAAKE est un magasin de vélo regroupant CYKL, une marque de vélo en titane, Reset un magasin de BMX et Studio Bike Fit un cabinet d'étude posturale pour cycliste
NeisAgent (2026-04-08 16:33:31+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
Konrad95 (2026-04-08 16:46:22+00:00): O co chodzi w tej edycji? Usunąłeś miejsce zatrzymania autobusu. Przystanki oznaczamy właśnie podwójnie.
Mrksmlk (2026-04-08 20:22:05+00:00): Nie edytowałem do tej pory przystanków i popełniłem błąd. Na razie próbuję cofnąć tę zmianę ale chwilowo mi nie wychodzi. Ostatecznie jeszcze raz odtworzę miejsce zatrzymania jeśli nie uda mi się cofnąć mojej niefortunnej edycji.
iandees (2026-04-08 15:17:37+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10878616592 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181055504, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Donellas (2026-04-16 14:09:27+00:00): thank you ;-)
scrambling_panda (2026-04-09 13:09:51+00:00): Hey, thanks for the change! I imagine the property/address 797 Grand Ave is still present, even though the business there closed? It would be best to leave the node there, at least as an address, maybe marked as a shop=vacant. That way, if something does move in and someone searches for that address in the future, they’ll still find something there.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181054534
vlakos555 (2026-04-09 14:35:20+00:00): robil som na mobile a odoslal som so zlým názvom. Správne mábyť ALDA na Račianskej. Sorry.
NeisBot (2026-04-08 15:06:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/277072140 v4 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1472039162 v1 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13507266238 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181054816
iandees (2026-04-08 15:17:44+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13507266238 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181055513, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
scrambling_panda (2026-04-09 13:21:33+00:00): jfyi, there were two little improvements made to the tags in following changesets: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181055519 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181097664

Both were very small fixes of things that are really easy to get a little wrong. Keep it up!
MassCartog (2026-04-08 18:24:45+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. Features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
kingkingHK (2026-04-09 02:15:13+00:00): I have changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13716545120 to `highway=stop` based on aerial imagery

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181075353
NeisBot (2026-04-08 15:30:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13716567804 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Real estate office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-08 16:33:33+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 01:49:10+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and explicit source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184205236

https://osm.org/changeset/184205236
NeatNit (2026-04-08 15:45:08+00:00): מוזר מאוד. הסקריפט שלי חשב ש:

name:he=בית ספש כברי

כלומר "ספש" במקום "ספר". אבל אין לי  מושג למה. המידע נשלף מ-Overpass אבל אני לא רואה סיבה שהוא ישנה תו אקראי ככה.

מקווה שהבעיה לא תחזור שוב...
NeatNit (2026-04-09 11:38:01+00:00): עדכון: תקלת RAM. לא מצפה שיחזור שנית.
bxl-forever (2026-04-08 15:51:43+00:00): Hello,

This looks like an undiscussed import of data from a database.

Some tags are completely absurd.

name=Borne de recharge or operator=Borne de recharge are completely impossible.  Names are not descriptions.

Phone number syntax or making every charging station become an address goes against current tagging practices.

I do not see any prior discussion of this import on the OSM Wiki, the OSM community forum or the Belgian Matrix channel.  Who is behind "IMC Platform"?  Does the licence of this database allow re-using onto OpenStreetMap?
NeisBot (2026-04-08 15:33:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13716551023 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Inspection office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-16 16:33:13+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181422550
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
ajmat (2026-04-09 08:59:11+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 181085683
bxl-forever (2026-04-08 15:44:10+00:00): Hello,

⚠️ You are massively importing a database onto OSM.

There are severe collation problems with your edits, as well as serious differences with the usual naming or tagging conventions.

There are countless duplicates, e.g.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13716588407 vs. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/549052367

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1202087323 vs. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13716580337


https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13716588407
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/549052367
ChrissW-R1 (2026-04-10 19:59:10+00:00): Is this the real name? Or does these ways have no name? In this case please use the tag https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:noname%3Dyes
Zw12 (2026-04-10 20:45:33+00:00): I just sent you a message:
No, this is still no official name. But the national park administration (Saxony) claimed that it shall have no name until “Johannespromenade” becomes usable. I don’t see this since its state is horrible (cf. e.g. https://rotweinundradieschen.de/Pathpics/johannprom/), very dangerous for dozens of years (not accessible by engines). But there should be some name since we even can not describe where we have been :-) So I decided to name it “nameless path” until some official decides how to name it (or not …).
ChrissW-R1 (2026-04-10 23:11:14+00:00): Thanks for the information. I set noname=yes in https://osm.org/changeset/181170851
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-08 15:43:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178405304

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178236913
Wildsharky (2026-04-13 11:44:35+00:00):  Partially reverted in changeset id:181093540
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-08 15:45:51+00:00): wycofuje https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180999866
eggie (2026-04-08 17:58:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-04-08 15:56:29+00:00): 🌍 欢迎来到 OSM，NIUDEPI。
谢谢你的贡献！

为了使协作更容易，并帮助他人理解你的编辑，最好添加你所做的更改的简要描述。清晰的评论可以帮助社区跟踪你的工作并提供更好的反馈。你可以在这里找到写好评论的提示[1]。

✅ 这里有一个基于你地图编辑的示例评论： "添加了收费营地"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, NIUDEPI.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added serviced camp site with fee"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
iandees (2026-04-08 16:04:26+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/357313954 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181057904, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
bxl-forever (2026-04-08 15:56:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/305305207 is already on the map.  You created a new node on the same place: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13716605846

Most of the nodes in this edit are duplicates.  Please stop blindly importing a database onto OSM, always check existing data first.  And please discuss the tags you want to use with the local community, you are using plainly incorrect tags.

One more example here, addr:street clearly does not match any know value for the street nearby.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13716603363
bxl-forever (2026-04-08 16:03:09+00:00): You are importing data from carbu.com onto OpenStreetMap.

According to article 7 of the conditions on their website, the content of the database is clearly copyrighted and they reserve the right to sue anyone who duplicates the content of their database.
https://carbu.com/belgique//CGU

I tried to reach you earlier today to alert you about those bad imports, but it looks like this account is unmonitored, because you continue dumping more and more data onto OSM.
NeisBot (2026-04-08 16:03:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13603984265 v6

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Burger restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-08 22:33:16+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 13:47:54+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values

https://osm.org/changeset/184915409
Wildsharky (2026-04-13 11:49:57+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181124859