piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
UTroe (2023-12-06 18:02:20+00:00): Irgendwann waren da 50 wegen Straßenschäden. Danach kam eine Baustelle mit 30 für einen Teilbereich. Jetzt sind insgesamt keine Begrenzungen mehr auf der Straße. Die Straße wurde natürlich nur in einem Teilbereich repariert und der Rest naja........
silversurfer83 (2023-12-06 19:39:39+00:00): Kenne das mit den Kreisstraßen 🙄
Frans S (2023-12-05 14:32:07+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144790516
MxxCon (2023-12-07 20:33:55+00:00): I'm not sure that landuse area is even necessary since it doesn't really accurately convey anything. It included not just residential but a lot of commercial, industrial, and educational.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144790551
1998alexkane (2023-12-07 23:49:26+00:00): I mostly wanted to get rid of the giant duplicate "Jersey City" label on the map from way 659474186.

However, as I understand landuse=residential, it only refers to the predominant use, so shops can exist in a landuse=residential area, and landuse can be refined down over time.

This particular landuse area is much broader than I would probably draw myself if done from scratch, so I'd encourage you to refine it if you have the time :)
eggie (2023-12-05 13:55:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Gebruikelijk is om de naam van het vaarwater op de vaarweg te zetten en niet nog eens op het vlak. Dat zou voldoende moeten zijn.. maar goed het is een haven en bovendien de Eemhaven. 
Benieuwd wat de wiki er over zegt. 


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-19 07:54:27+00:00): Why did you map the tennis courts as a golf clubhouse?
aTarom (2023-12-05 16:52:00+00:00): Hola jesus4306, bienvenido, para nombres populares disponemos de "loc_name"
veo que el name es "Rotonda Floresta"
si se conoce localmente como "Rotonda de las Putas" deberías colocarlo en "loc_name" y nunca en "name"
Saludos
Dodko (2023-12-05 14:39:15+00:00): Obnovená
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3951399042/history
MarcoR (2023-12-19 20:15:19+00:00): Bonjour, pourriez-vous vérifier le nœud https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11396025798 qui a un nom assez étrange ?

Merci, bonne journée,
Marco.
silversurfer83 (2023-12-05 20:49:16+00:00): Hi :)

bitte nicht falsch auffassen, dass ich dir hier schreibe. Ich weiß, dass niemand hier perfekt ist und gerade am Anfang ist es oft sehr komplex. Daher versuche in Neuen immer ein paar Tips zu geben um möglichst früh mögliche Anfänger"fehler" zu sehen und ggf. Dinge besser zu machen.

Bei den Pools hätte ich folgende Tips und HInweise:

- wenn ein Objekt in der Realität praktisch rund ist, dann können wir das mit dem Editor auch rund machen: Einfach die Taste "o" drücken, wenn es ausgewählt ist. Macht es schön rund.

- das Gleiche gilt für rechteckige Objekte: Zeichnen, auswählen, Taste "Q" drücken und schon hat man saubere Winkel.

- noch direkt zu den Pools: Wenn die Dinger nicht sicher als dauerhaft zu erkennen sind, würde ich sie nicht einzeichnen. Viele Menschen haben auch nur im Sommer ein Becken im Garten.

Alles Gute und weiter viel Spaß
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144790945
eggie (2023-12-05 14:00:04+00:00): De naam is toegevoegd door de voorgaande mapper en de toevoeging lijkt me correct. Vraag me alleen af of dubbel taggen zinvol is.

Mapse
eggie
Filip009 (2023-12-07 08:21:31+00:00): umelý trávnik nemusíte písať aj do mena, keď tam je surface=artificial_turf. Taktiež meno budovy Futbalový Štadión je zbytočné.
Frans S (2023-12-05 14:29:46+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and precise mapped.!!

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144791292
arjunaraoc (2023-12-28 14:26:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144791639
felipeeugenio (2023-12-05 13:33:52+00:00): Hola Cristopher
Lo que estás diciendo con tu edición es que las canchas y el edificio no son parte del colegio.
Por favor no usar inner y outer para colegios.
saludos
Layft Greater (2023-12-05 14:49:01+00:00): Reverted
Layft Greater (2023-12-05 15:17:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144795664
mcliquid (2023-12-05 18:25:47+00:00): Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
trigpoint (2023-12-07 08:13:48+00:00): How is the weird website you added for Wroxeter in any way related to Wroxeter?
Fizzie-DWG (2024-02-02 04:58:17+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146970051
Syl (2023-12-07 10:16:01+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai modifié la piscine en enlevant que c'est une piscine en activité et en remettant que c'est un bâtiment. La piscine est fermée définitivement.
Et pour le marché j'ai corrigé le nom, "(fermé)" n'en faisant pas partie, j'ai mis cette information avec un autre attribut.
Bonne journée.
Andy_From_NJ (2023-12-05 14:10:24+00:00): The original name may be correct. Will check the sign on the street next time I'm there.
rickmastfan67 (2023-12-08 02:36:23+00:00): Is there a news article out saying the the Union City bypass is open yet?  If not, this changeset should be reverted till it's officially open.
rickmastfan67 (2023-12-08 03:08:26+00:00): Reverted in Changeset: 144886435 till there's official word that this has been opened to traffic.

The following news article mentioned it was nearing completion was posted the same day this original changeset marking it opened was done.

https://www.newsbreak.com/union-city-tn/3254157343707-union-city-s-690-roadway-paving-the-path-to-economic-prosperity-and-connectivity
Syl (2023-12-07 10:06:07+00:00): Bonjour, le lycée est déjà renseignée comme une zone : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428249172
Un objet sur le terrain ne doit être présent qu'une fois dans OpenStreetMap. J'ai enlevé les informations en double qui étaient sur le bâtiment et copié le site web qui manquant sur la zone.
Bonne journée.
trigpoint (2023-12-06 08:33:53+00:00): Wat's Dyke Way is already mapped as a relation, it is incorrect to duplicate that name on individual paths. That is not the name of the path, but of one of the routes that passes over it.

The names you have added seem unlikely, just because things can be translated doesn't mean they should be. Its unlikely many French, Spanish or Italians have  even heard of it.
supersellout6907 (2023-12-07 00:03:35+00:00): Sorry about that, i was just going off of translations from the Wikipedia page. I just thought it was important to add them for map localization
SomeoneElse (2023-12-07 00:13:39+00:00): Actually, we can't use wikipedia as a source because its licence isn't compatible with OSM.  I know that sounds bizarre, but sometimes licensing results in bizarre outcomes. :)
trigpoint (2023-12-07 00:16:23+00:00): Thank you for your reply however Wikipedia is not a valid source for OSM.

It it is not released under the correct license. The big question is where did Wikipedia get that information from.
SomeoneElse (2023-12-07 00:16:43+00:00): With regard to path naming, if something's part of a route relation, things can decide whether or not to show it already, like https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#14/52.9975/-3.0157 (disclaimer - I created that).
Tombula (2023-12-05 14:15:09+00:00): revert of Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144715424
Gonéo (2023-12-05 16:03:54+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap. Suite à la demande de revue, voici quelques remarques pour progresser.

- il est préférable de séparer les modifications éloignées, c'est plus facile à suivre pour tout le monde
- seule la première lettre des noms propres est à mettre en majuscules (pour le stade)
- il y avait des avertissements de building qui croisent des chemins (mais ils étaient peut-être déjà là avant).
silversurfer83 (2023-12-05 19:59:37+00:00): Gude :)

zu dieser Änderung empfehle ich dir die Lektüre folgender beiden Artikel im Wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen

Da auf den Luftbildern aktuell noch nichts zu erkennen ist, ist es keine gute Idee die Gebäude zu löschen. Und auch die geplante Rettungswache sollte entsprechend der Lebenzyklusvorgaben eingetragen werden um die Realität besser wiederzugeben.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144794167
Nakaner-repair (2023-12-05 14:34:22+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 144608852, 144628082, 144628134, 144628167, 144628180, 144628228, 144628268, 144628280, 144630783, 144631181, 144631200, 144631212, 144631266, 144634164, 144635889, 144636142, 144636193, 144636234, 144636275, 144636373, 144636416, 144636450, 144636552, 144636593, 144636625, 144636715, 144636763, 144636898, 144637108, 144637154, 144637285, 144645058, 144645070, 144645095, 144645110, 144645213, 144645221, 144645290, 144645302, 144645314, 144645362, 144645377, 144645396, 144645440, 144645459, 144645474, 144645487, 144645515, 144645662, 144664401, 144664453, 144664503, 144664681, 144664729, 144664783, 144664813, 144664896, 144665006, 144665040, 144665072, 144665135, 144665183, 144665291, 144665757, 144665786, 144665798, 144665850, 144665883, 144665917.
trigpoint (2023-12-06 08:23:38+00:00): And the source of these names is?

Other than Shrewsbury and Yr Amwythig I have never seen any of these names in use.
trigpoint (2023-12-07 08:14:44+00:00): No response, reverted
Matija Nalis (2024-02-20 05:33:21+00:00): Hi, thank you for your interest in Railways on OSM, David! 

However, `railway=abandoned` does not seem correct for this specific old razed railway line "Samoborček" - vast majority of it is completely gone for decades and no visible traces remain (except for several abandoned  bridges and similar, whose remains which I've surveyed and added Commons pictures for). I'll fix this changeset manually back to `railway=razed`, but please do take note of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=razed and linked pages for differences between unused/abandoned/razed, especially for railway lines which are already mapped. Thanks!

Also, could you in the future add sources used to the changeset comment? This one only mentions Croatia 2019-2020 Aerials, and on those Samoborček railway are missing, so that cannot be the source of railway data.
mcliquid (2023-12-05 18:25:09+00:00): Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
andershl (2023-12-05 19:55:31+00:00): Yes, I am aware of it. Still it typically happening if one occasionally forget to exit and restart Potlatch.
yzal (2023-12-11 14:45:24+00:00): Hello, based on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=weir when you map weir as a way it should share a node with the river where they cross.

Dobrý deň, na základe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:waterway%3Dweir keď mapujete hať ako cestu, tak by mala zdieľať bod s riekou v mieste kde sa pretínajú.
Tobias235 (2023-12-11 15:47:00+00:00): Dobrý den, mohu se prosím zeptat, kde přesně jste chybu našel? Já jsem všechny jezy mapoval tímhle symbolem https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=weir Tak ať to mohu  opravit.
yzal (2023-12-12 14:22:03+00:00): Značka waterway=weir je dobrá.  Ale v tej dokumentácii je napísané "The waterway=weir should share a node with the river where they cross." po česky "Jez by měl sdílet uzel s řekou na místě, kde se kříží." Viac hádam napovie obrázok (kliknite pre priblíženie) https://imgur.com/a/RCkk79X
Treba si dať pri oprave pozor, aby bol bod spoločný pre obe cesty. V IDeditore (ten v prehliadači) sa ľahko stane, že umiestnite bod do miesta, kde sa cesty krížia, ale bod bude len na jednej ceste a nie na oboch. Ak by ste s tým mali problém tak napíšte a ja to poopravujem vo všetkých zmenách. Nie je toho až tak veľa.
Tobias235 (2023-12-12 21:06:40+00:00): Děkuji za upřesnění. Snažil jsem se teď vše opravit tak, aby to už sedělo.
Fraxi (2023-12-05 15:25:11+00:00): Използвани и снимки от Bing Streetside, Mapbox
Jordi MF (2023-12-05 16:48:36+00:00): Hola,
¿De dónde has sacado el topónimo "Peñón"? El nombre oficial es l'Escull de l'Illa (https://visor.gva.es/visor/?extension=780525,4294037,781229,4294369&nivelZoom=18&capasids=Topografico;,Toponimia;&tcapas=1.0,1.0).
mottiger (2023-12-06 06:21:31+00:00): Hi
It seems that you are deleting the solar panel nodes without creating the areas. Can you explain why?
Cheers
liliane nishimirwe (2023-12-06 07:51:49+00:00): Jesus Christ. I am very sorry. This is a big challenge. I was learning to use Map roulette. 
I didn't know that I am committing an error. 

Please 🙏 forgive me I am going to fix all of them 😭
liliane nishimirwe (2023-12-06 07:55:11+00:00): If there is a way a I can use to fix my errors please don't hesitate to help me so that I can fix them. Thank you I will be waiting for your good response 🙏
mottiger (2023-12-06 08:28:17+00:00): You can go through your edits and either add the nodes again or just draw the outlines.

Maybe tonight or over the next weekend I'll do it by myself anyway.

No worries, errors happen in a open project like this.
liliane nishimirwe (2023-12-06 08:35:53+00:00): Thank you so much for the help and for forgiveness. God bless you
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-05 15:10:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241583588
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1228865013

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2023-12-05 15:16:08+00:00): Dag NP  De specificatie construction het ik teruggezet.
MVG
eggie
literan (2023-12-05 16:54:08+00:00): не надо поверх уже отрисованных парков рисовать свои дубли. Такие правки будут откачены.
Jordi MF (2023-12-05 17:04:44+00:00): ¿Puedes dar la fuente de información sobre la traducción de "rotes"? Les Rotes es el nombre por el que se conoce esta partida. Es el nombre que reciben aquellas zonas que se labraron para uso humano. No tiene traducción como "rota" ("trencat, en valenciano) y lo único que se consigue con traducciones inventadas es dificultar la orientación de los usuarios cuando tengan el mapa configurado en castellano.
emersonveenstra (2023-12-06 14:36:25+00:00): Hi there,

You created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1228881227 with no tags, could you go back and tag it? Thanks!
muchichka_s (2023-12-05 16:29:09+00:00): Не вигадуй людям інші імена. Немає ніякого "Франциска Карпинского". Як мінімум глянь в Вікіпедія

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88299414
https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%86%D1%96%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BA_%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BF%D1%96%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9
muchichka_s (2023-12-05 16:29:29+00:00): https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BF%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%8C%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9,_%D0%A4%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BA
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-05 15:50:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11396331106
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11396331157

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
flohoff (2023-12-07 00:15:35+00:00): Moin,
weil ich gerade gesehen habe das du das hier editiert hast.

Kannst du mir sagen was das für ein spannendes Konstrukt ist mit den beiden Einbahnstraßen?

Mir ist das in der routingüberwachun aufgefallen. Wir schicken mit OSM Daten da Durchgangsverkehr durch. Also von Schnathorst nach Eickhorst z.b. 

Und dann ist es spannend das das als "service" road getagged ist - Das wären ja Wege auf Privatgelände - Das sieht sehr falsch aus - Das müssten unclassified sein.

Flo
Jordi MF (2023-12-05 17:20:00+00:00): Hola,
¿Podrías indicar la fuente en la que te basa para traducir Gavarda como Gabarda? Oficialmente, esta pedanía se escribe como "Gavarda" (https://visor.gva.es/visor/?extension=711461,4329388,712868,4330040&nivelZoom=17&capasids=Topografico;,Toponimia;&tcapas=1.0,1.0).
El "Diccionario de topónimos españoles y sus gentilicios" de Pancracio Celdrán acepta el nombre en "v", por tanto, debería manterse ese y no en "b".
jeslop (2023-12-05 15:55:42+00:00): El comentario correcto es sustitución de nombre en mayúsculas.
Lejun (2023-12-09 17:28:37+00:00): Aïe, la modification picote ! L'ancien élément avait beaucoup de détails[1], ils sont tous caduques ou ça serait pertinent d'en reprendre quelques-uns ?

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1046942/history
lpo-mtoma (2023-12-11 07:57:26+00:00): Oui j'avais vu ça mais mystérieusement, le périmètre a réussi à s'afficher à toutes les échelles de mon côté, ce qui n'était pas le cas avant
midget sub (2024-05-21 21:59:39+00:00): Please stop adding private tracks that are posted no trespassing as public ways.
Baloo Uriza (2023-12-05 16:22:57+00:00): Verifiably wrong, this is a bannered route and abbreviations don't belong in tags.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144797527
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-30 11:16:03+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=american;1
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11396358319/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=american
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-18 01:29:28+00:00): Thank you for updating the map. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144797667
Kai Johnson (2024-05-18 04:04:08+00:00): Thank you for your recent changeset reviews and for the kind comments! I really appreciate them!
eggie (2023-12-05 21:57:48+00:00): Dag Warzel  Lijkt me oke als er een bordje staat art 461 wvs of een hek. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-12-05 21:59:00+00:00): Dag Zant.. 
Je vraagt feedback 
Dit is geheel de correcte manier.
MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-05 16:40:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7468664027
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/253661701

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
fititnt (2023-12-11 21:37:38+00:00): Olá Raquel.

Sobre o elemento <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1228882211/history#map=14/-9.6310/-35.7444> (que, aliás, nem mesmo estou conseguindo encontrar o que é apontado como source=* para comparar com o que foi adicionado).

Enfim, mesmo assumindo que exista um documento  que afirme isso (e, ainda assim, seria do ano de 1965, então estamos falando de OpenStreetMap, não sobre o OpenHistoricalMap), o que você adicionou ao mapa diverge do princípio de "Ground truth" <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ground_truth>, e isso é muito óbvio.

O elemento está como landuse=industrial + industrial=mine , que significa isso uma mina a céu aberto como esta https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Kalgoorlie_open_cast_mine.jpg . Não obstante, não só o que foi adicionado nesse changeset diverge do que já estava previamente mapeado (em especial os  landuse=*) como também é facilmente verificável por imagem aérea e por imagem de rua de que a maior parte dessa região, não tem nada relacionado a uma mina a céu aberto. Mesmo as edificações na região na maioria são residenciais (e contém também edificações comerciais e também escolas/hospitais/polícia. Até mesmo o https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/243850911#map=19/-9.64768/-35.73393 (que é admin_centre de uma capital brasileira que é turística, bem como do estado do Alagoas) está dentro de um industrial=mine.

Enfim. O elemento que você adicionou tem que ser deletado. Você mesma vai deletar, ou eu deleto?
Raquel Dezidério Souto (2024-01-03 15:33:00+00:00): Olá,

Inclui a fonte da poligonal, extraída de site oficial - Sigmine/DNPM.

Pela wiki OSM, a etiqueta "industrial=mine" serve a explorações em superfície e em subsuperfície (caso em questão, da exploração de sal-gema).

Assim, não conflita com o que está mapeado em superfície. Adiciono a nota de que o mapeamento da área em superfície está bem ruim em algumas partes (especialmente, edifícios), poderia emitir avisos para outros mapeadores. 

Peço não deletar a feição, pois trata-se de dado oficial ainda vigente e importante para o caso do desastre. Grata.
Raquel Dezidério Souto (2024-01-03 15:33:42+00:00): @fititnt
Raquel Dezidério Souto (2024-01-23 17:17:48+00:00): Incluí mais uma tag surface=no, para que o renderizador não emita a mensagem de alerta.
Raquel Dezidério Souto (2024-01-24 00:19:32+00:00): Removido. Obrigada por esclarecer. O que entendi, é que não há previsão então para este tipo de mineração, o que é uma pena, pois não tem como mapear as minas de sal gema, configuradas como nesta área de Maceió.