piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MarkoŠatrak (2025-03-12 10:12:50+00:00): Hi @jleedev,

I’m writing here as the leader of our team’s OSM editing activity.

Thank you for bringing this up. Our team has already recognized the mistake of modifying existing tags and has reverted the changes where hgv=destination values were previously present in subsequent changesets (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163429502).

Please let us know if the latest version of any of the ways is still incorrect.
IvaLedinščak (2025-03-12 10:23:42+00:00): Reverted because of unnecessary modification of previously existing tags #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163520881
eggie (2025-03-08 21:07:37+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk  ...Hier heb je adresnode Klompenwaard 3 ergens anders heen gesleept per abuis.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=163375279

gr eggie
eggie (2025-03-08 21:09:55+00:00): Adresnode teruggeplaatst
wvdr (2025-03-08 21:28:27+00:00): Excuus, dank voor de oplettendheid
eggie (2025-03-08 21:37:31+00:00): Dat onbedoeld verplaatsen komt door schuiven met de kaart. Je selecteert dan onbewust een node met de linker muisknop en gaat dan schuiven met de kaart. Maar dan schuift niet de kaart, maar de node.

Een onhebbelijkheid van editor iD.
Die gebruikt bij schuiven en selectie helaas de linkermuisknop.
olo81 (2025-03-09 22:56:02+00:00): Dublujesz nazwy, nazywasz drogi dojazdowe, których nie nazywamy. Dodajesz tagi access=no, które służą w tym przypadku nie wiadomo czemu? Dodajesz budynki, których już nie ma. 
Dodajesz teren budowy i jednocześnie w tym samym teren o podobnym kształcie który tagujesz lasem.  
Twoje edycje to jeden wielki bałagan :/
Kamil Adam (2025-03-11 18:16:03+00:00): Chłopie wyluzuj trochę, na wstępie jakieś cześć czy coś dopiero potem pisz problem. Bez kultury to nie pisz, jak masz nerwy to ochłoń. Teren budowy osiedla jest, las w tym miejscu też jest - jest karczowany powoli.
olo81 (2025-03-11 18:24:42+00:00): Dlaczego mam wyluzować? Niemal każdą twoją edycję trzeba poprawiać. A ty cały czas wprowadzasz kolejne z błędami. Zero refleksji. A jak zwrócić uwagę to komentarz adpersona bez odniesienia do swoich błędów i jawne kłamstwa.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-12 08:48:25+00:00): if there is a lift gate here then it should be attached to the road (not a free-floating node)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12645872916/history

BTW, I fixed missing _ (there was a space instead)
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-08 19:10:44+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314876259

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2025-03-08 21:01:01+00:00): poprawione
JeroenHoek (2025-03-08 20:29:34+00:00): Als je het juiste adres weet (23?), mag je hem ook samenvoegen met de adresnode die al op de kaart staat.

Changeset-commentaar mag bij Nederlandse wijzigingen ook gewoon in het Nederlands trouwens.
eggie (2025-03-08 20:59:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-08 20:00:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4512245204

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Misiek 63 (2025-03-09 20:20:35+00:00): Wpisałem Chociszewo w pole "Ulica / Miejscowość (adres bez ulicy)", dlatego myślałem, że jest ok. Poprawiłem.
marc__marc (2026-01-08 13:17:28+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1365586893
May  I suggest that you load buildings or the area before upload to have a warning when buildings cross a road ?
I just fix this one.
but 3950 issues exist with objets you touched last (it doesn't mean you mean the issue, it is simply an indication that it could often have been detected before upload)
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issues/open?item=1070&source=&class=&username=Omnific&bbox=
Regards,
Marc
Glassman (2025-03-09 18:26:58+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

One suggestion. Try not to connect the trail to the park landuse. If either change, it requires disconnecting nodes. 

Also, Is this a trail or more like a gravel sidewalk? OSM, which started in England, uses British English terms. So a path lis like a trail and a footway is more like a sidewalk. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163378278
eggie (2025-03-08 21:18:05+00:00): Dag Lotofaag..

Wanneer het uitsluiten bedoeld is voor voetgangers dan is het correct met footway, maar wanneer je er ook mag fietsen dan beter highway=path gebruiken 
Je hebt hier dus niet =path gebruikt, maar footway. Daar is foot=yes trouwens default en hoef je niet te taggen.
Kort door de bocht G7 bord of duidelijk alleen voor voetgangers dan footway.  Geen bebording en geen hoge stoeprand dan highway=path en dan wel evt foot en bicycle=yes voor de duidelijkheid. MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-08 21:24:19+00:00): Het overkluisde gedeelte heb ik met tunnel=building_passage getagd.
Denk dat footway wel correct is hier. 
Up to you
Yog Sot (2025-03-08 21:10:24+00:00): you have specified tactile_paving for a cycleway. That is invalid
theDM (2025-03-08 21:15:28+00:00): Actually, in these locations there should be crosswalks, because actually, these places are crosswalks - marked or unmarked depending on specific location. Let me correct it.
theDM (2025-03-08 21:19:51+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tactile_paving#Use_on_ways
depends on situation. If tacticle paving is paralel to sidewalk, can be used on way.
"On footways, when there is a line all the way on the footway highway=footway."
theDM (2025-03-08 21:26:52+00:00): I'm correcting these crossing points. Nevertheless, I will be there on Monday, so I can record driving there.
Yog Sot (2025-03-08 21:32:30+00:00): it specifies:
> On footways, when there is a line all the way on the footway highway=footway. 

It doesn't specify to tag on a way paraller to that footway, which you did and it's impossible to say if it's a on a cycleway or not. 

You are mapping fiction now. Revert your vandalism that removed all this information and map it somewhere else where it is missing if you're learning to do so. 

Removing detailed work of someone else is ot permitted.  Face it
Senihtu (2026-01-31 14:39:34+00:00): Hi!
kannst Du Dir Straße w128347149 und Häuser (w128347149, w1365597561) noch einmal genauer ansehen ob das nun die Tiefe oder die Große Hohle ist?
Alkis meint: Tiefe Hohle. Aber Du warst dort - ich nicht...
Grüße
Senihtu
Map_HeRo (2026-01-31 15:01:17+00:00): Hallo Senihtu, 
es ist die Tiefe Hohle. Die Große Hohle war mir kurz zuvor begegnet und hat hier unbeabsichtigt Einzug gehalten, ich habe es aber noch am selben Tag im nächsten CS zu Tiefe Hohle korrigiert. Ist also bereits seit langem erledigt.
Gruß Mikke
Map_HeRo (2026-01-31 15:04:10+00:00): Ok, sehe gerade, dass die Adresse vom Haus noch korrigiert werden muss ... das kriegen wir hin. Danke für den Hinweis.
Senihtu (2026-01-31 15:05:02+00:00): ok. ich habe dann addr:street berichtigt. Da stand noch "Große" - was den OSM-Inspector gestört hat.
Schönes Restwochenende!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-03-23 10:16:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163979213 where the changeset comment is: Following on from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163963906 , and see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/about-mapping-features-with-computer-vision/127790 - reverting some 'AI detected swimming pools', some of dubious quality.
limes11 (2025-03-09 09:06:22+00:00): Hallo PKautz, 

bitte die Quelle für die Eintragungen an den TanteEnso-Läden nennen.

Insbesondere bei diesem hier.

Vielen Dank, Limes
PKautz (2025-03-09 09:42:07+00:00): Hallo Limes,

eine Übersicht über bestehende Tante-Enso-Standorte findet man unter
https://www.tanteenso.de/content/tanteenso/standorte.

Den Standort in Bad Neuenahr hatte bis vor Kurzem dort auch noch gefunden, muss aber jetzt einräumen, dass er dort nicht mehr gelistet ist. Ich korrigiere es gleich, falls noch nicht geschehen.

Gruß, PKautz
eggie (2025-03-08 21:27:07+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.
De info heb ik samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
Nonfau (2025-03-08 21:35:48+00:00): Check!
eggie (2025-03-08 21:56:18+00:00): Hoi.. je zou je notes nog even op opgelost kunnen zetten.
Gr eggie
Nonfau (2025-03-08 22:07:35+00:00): Ah, had niet door dat dat een ding was. Thanks
eggie (2025-03-08 22:10:32+00:00): 👍
user_20546205 (2025-05-15 15:27:00+00:00): 您好，人民公园的应该添加一个大的公园标签，而不是将人工林命名为人民公园。
jm428 (2025-03-27 21:07:49+00:00): Hi, from your changeset comment it sounds like this is privately owned, but you tagged it as having access restricted. Read this to understand the difference between access=private and ownership=private: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=private?uselang=en#Clarification_of_the_term_%E2%80%9Cprivate%E2%80%9D
jm428 (2025-03-27 21:14:16+00:00): It looks like you were trying to delete Irwin Place, but in doing so you accidentally made this tiny road connecting State St to the sidewalk. If you were trying to delete Irwin Place, you should delete this too.
jm428 (2025-03-27 21:14:35+00:00): here is the link, I meant to include it in that comment: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1365618149
Yog Sot (2025-03-08 21:48:27+00:00): this change doesn't restore even 1% of the lost data you have reverted
theDM (2025-03-08 21:58:42+00:00): The missing part was tactical_paving. Curbs are mapped with 'yes' value, so needed information is mapped. Don't spread misinformation.
Yog Sot (2025-03-08 22:16:06+00:00): i speak about all missing informations, you speak just about the 1% you didn't even do properly. 
But when i tell about it, this is misinformation. Go win USA presidential elections with that logic of yours. 

Fix all features you have broken or i will have to do it myself. Again...
SomeoneElse2 (2025-03-12 02:00:17+00:00): Hello,
There seems to be a bit of an odd spur on a few route relations at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1832946#map=19/51.626375/-1.013466 .  Is that a mistake and do they all go to the south, or is there a bit through the field missing?  
Affected relations can be seen at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#19/51.62638/-1.01347 .
Best Regards,
Andy
Wookey (2025-03-12 04:43:33+00:00): The spur to the field gate is not part of any of the routes/relations. The mapping was previously wrong, showing the routes (Ridgeway, Icknield Way etc)  going along a track that way, with a parallel footway that was not part of any of these relations.

In fact the track through the field no longer exists (if it ever did) - it's just a spur to a field gate, and the 'unimportant parallel footway' is in the fact the main route for Ridgeway, Icknield Way etc. So there is no mistake in the mapping now. It looked to me like the relations were still OK, but I could have been wrong. The spur to the gate should be removed from the relations,.
SomeoneElse (2025-03-13 11:27:11+00:00): Thanks - done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163565825
AwFi (2025-03-10 08:50:24+00:00): Ciao, 
Ho visto che negli ultimi changeset hai aggiunto la ex rete tramviaria di Genova, però a quanto mi risulta non c'è più nessuna traccia visibile e quindi penso che tale aggiunta sia più adatta ad OHM che tratta del passato e non della situazione attuale (https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/). Tra l'altro ho visto che hai fatto le stesse cose anche a Milano, fare la migrazione di queste aggiunte non sarebbe male. 
Buon mapping!
PS: per favore potresti usare nomi dei changeset più chiari?
i2004 (2025-03-09 00:08:15+00:00): te hice el 114 aeroparque que se estrena el lunes
❤️‍🔥 (2025-03-09 02:00:25+00:00): hey, this restriction is only to stop newbies from accidentally deleting important features like place=city. 

to bypass this safety check, you just need to manually remove the wikidata tag first: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d6a59553-7d0f-4812-aae6-a88195c01357
maro21 (2025-03-13 22:03:05+00:00): Jest tu nieciągłość kategorii drogi. Dlaczego dałeś secondary?
pavvv (2025-03-14 04:06:15+00:00): Ta droga służy jadącym z AWW w stronę księża, czyli ruchowi secondary, a nie primary. Podobnie oznaczyłem https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16140502 jako tertiary, bo ruch wzdłuż Powstańców Śląskich się tedy nie porusza lub pozostawiłem tutaj tertiary https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447975717 , ponieważ jadąc drogami secondary nie da się wjechać na tę drogę. Dla zwykłych rond stosuje się inną logikę.

Teraz jak otworzono zjazd na Wilczą, to być może powinno się przełożyć secondary na nią i zawrotkę koło Selgrosa, chyba że dopiero po wyasfaltowaniu Wilczej.
maro21 (2025-05-28 19:27:32+00:00): Nie zmieniamy kategorii na takim krótkim odcinku drogi. Kiedy jadę główną drogą to nie jest tak, że na parę metrów nagle wjeżdżam w inną kategorię drogi, a potem znowu na wyższą.
pavvv (2025-05-28 19:33:46+00:00): Gdzie jest to napisane na wiki?
Mój punkt widzenia jest taki, że jadąc w jakiejś ważnej relacji, pozostawiamy za sobą określoną kategorię. Ten fragment służy ruchowi z drogi secondary, czyli AWW → Księże.
maro21 (2025-03-13 22:05:01+00:00): Ta droga nie ma nazwy.
pavvv (2025-03-14 03:56:57+00:00): Przyjęło się konwencję, że mapujemy nazwę drogi takich łączników od drogi skręcającej.
maro21 (2025-05-28 19:28:11+00:00): Kto przyjął?
pavvv (2025-05-28 19:35:22+00:00): Zobacz komentarze pod innymi zmianami dotyczącymi nazw na takich fragmentach.
L29Ah (2025-03-09 19:48:59+00:00): Part of those woods are orchards. Why did you delete the mapped ones? natural=wood is used for naturally growing woods, not orchards or otherwise managed woody vegetation.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163381698
gardenBiker (2025-03-10 13:07:35+00:00): @L29Ah, I had a task to add green areas. It is difficult to accurately distinguish between a forest and a garden based on satellite images, as they look very similar. I thought that the mapper might have mistakenly used a tag for garden instead of forest. So I deleted what I think were two garden polygons and replaced them with a forest polygon. In principle, the forest tag can be replaced with a garden tag, but the problem is that it is difficult to tell exactly where the garden ends and the forest begins based on satellite images.
bob3bob3 (2025-03-08 23:09:41+00:00): Woops was actually private Mapillary images, for house numbers
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-16 09:42:49+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
brendan77 (2026-02-02 18:43:22+00:00): I deleted way "A Chair (1365633431)" via changeset 178019676 because it appears to be a duplicate. If I made a mistake feel free to revert my change.
Udarian (2025-03-09 00:53:23+00:00): next time can you please leave a better change set comment, for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments and split your commit up geographically so that the geographic size of the commit is smaller, for more info see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
GinaroZ (2025-03-12 20:24:11+00:00): Dunno if the two taxi parking/rank areas should be tagged with this one already there?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4284836755
ExoMal (2025-03-13 15:00:47+00:00): Oops, yeah, thanks for letting me know I missed the duplicate. I've modified the parking tags and copied the taxi stand node tags over to a relation combining both areas (like in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15030337), but I'm not entirely sure how well supported taxi stand relations are 🤔
GinaroZ (2025-03-20 22:19:06+00:00): Hmm, not supported by the renderer (that German one has a duplicate taxi area around it), maybe instead there just needs to be a taxi node in between the parking areas to keep it simple? Those are already tagged private so don't need to be in a taxi relation?
ExoMal (2025-03-27 15:22:07+00:00): Yeah, that sounds fair. I'll restore the previous node then.
ma-rt-in (2025-03-16 11:01:59+00:00): Hallo,

leider musste ich deinen Änderungssatz zurücksetzten, da durch deine Ändeurngen mehrere Wege verzogen worden sind.
Bitte achte auf das was Du änderst.
Viel Spaß aber weiterhin und Grüße
aharvey (2025-05-22 01:40:35+00:00): it shows up on Sentinel-2 imagery so I've updated the geometry, it looks like you had it too big, I tried to keep the shape but it's quite hard without a higher resolution image.
G4rden3r (2025-03-10 10:24:53+00:00): Moin,
Sehr schön, dass du den Weg zu uns gefunden hast.
Allerdings sind mir ein paar Kleinigkeiten aufgefallen. Du musst bei Buslinien etwas mehr aufpassen. Hier ist die Reihenfolge der Objekte in der Relation sehr wichtig (stop1,Platform1,stop2,Platform2,…,dann alle Wege in richtiger Reihenfolge). Zudem gehören in den route_master (Hauptroute) nur die Linien, keine Wege oder Plattformen. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:%C3%96ffentlicher_Verkehr#Strecken/Linien/Kurse)
Ich habe die betroffenen Linien mal korrigiert. Wenn du noch Fragen hast, melde dich bei mir oder im Forum oder bei Telegram.
Aber lass dich ansonsten nicht abhalten und mappe fleißig weiter.

VG
G4rden3r
A67-A67 (2025-03-08 23:55:58+00:00): Hoi,
Waarom verwijder je de naam van het eiland? Alleen omdat je het een vreemde naam vindt?

Zie ook: https://www.vadedo.nl/eiland
mfvl (2025-03-09 00:27:18+00:00): Terug veranderd via wijzigingset 163383565
A67-A67 (2025-03-10 19:42:49+00:00): Bedankt voor het terugzetten
Supaplex (2025-03-09 08:22:22+00:00): 請問描繪非開放授權圖資而回退，請詳見社群公告：https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/124651
累犯將送至Data Working Group處理

Supaplex

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163390073
jb54osm (2025-03-09 16:26:25+00:00): Maar het eiland heet echt zo 😉. Zie https://www.vadedo.nl/eiland .
Ook de andere "On..." worden op de site genoemd.
mfvl (2025-03-10 00:08:46+00:00): Het is inmiddels hersteld echter het kijkt van het zoom niveau af te hangen welke naam getoond wordt
SomeoneElse (2025-03-09 01:10:10+00:00): DO NOT DO ANY MORE REVERTS.
You will be blocked from the OSM API if you do.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of the OSM Data Working Group.
YomanNH (2025-03-18 21:42:57+00:00): Yog Sot, czyżbyś użył reverta mimo zakazu? :)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163791238
PostaMap_Infinite (2025-03-09 01:32:28+00:00): Added unmapped features, fixing areas and feature details, improving waterways to be more accurate, fixing forest areas, and residential areas, improving parking and way tagging, and more!
NeisBot (2025-03-09 00:39:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
nevw (2025-03-09 01:22:22+00:00): Also used Geoscience Australia - Surface Hydrology Polygons (Regional) source
MarinoBM (2025-03-26 11:24:23+00:00): Hola Mabema1, gracias por contribuir a mejorar los datos de OpenStreetMap.
He observado que todos los nombres los añades entrecomillados. No lo veo apropiado porque parece que se le quiere resaltar o añadir alguna característica distinta a lo que es el nombre.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Nombre_es_solo_el_nombre

Revísalo.
Un saludo.
b-jazz (2025-03-10 17:23:42+00:00): Thanks for the additions. A couple of comments to improve your mapping if you're interested.
* You shouldn't put names on holes and fairways and greens and such unless the golf course has explicitly named them. You should just use a "ref=1" tag instead of "name=Fairway 1".
* If your fairway surrounds the green, you should select both objects (shift click) and right click to Merge them into what is called a multipolygon.

You can find more information at the golf_course wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 00:29:00+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165049947
Baloo Uriza (2025-03-10 18:29:44+00:00): Updated that with relations to make it clearer.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163385921
Myazyk (2025-06-12 17:45:07+00:00): Має бути окремо зв'язок для поїзда №59 Київ-Чоп та окремо для поїзда №60 Чоп-Київ
felipeeugenio (2025-03-09 23:22:13+00:00): There is nothing there....
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163386171
felipeeugenio (2025-03-09 23:25:04+00:00): Sorry. in mapbox there is nothing. In Esri there is clearly something.

Nevertheless, I totally don´t believe the name is in English.
I will translate that.
太平枇杷 (2025-03-10 06:42:26+00:00): Esri等國外提供的圖資均有所偏移，請不要直接套疊並將原本已經修改好的道路再改成偏移的，可以先使用Taiwan e-map Open data圖資查看再進行修正。
太平枇杷 (2025-03-10 06:47:26+00:00): 請參考
https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/permalink/7962099157188817/
Henry572 (2025-03-14 07:54:32+00:00): Hallo physi,
Warum hast du die name:etymology:*-Tags entfernt? Sind sie falsch?
Viele Grüße, Hendrik
ferog_v (2025-08-24 16:04:05+00:00): El Boulevard Portuario no pertenece a los Ejes de Transporte, como se puede consultar en https://datosviales2020.routedev.mx/main
En https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mexico/Red_Nacional_de_Caminos
Se indica que las vias "Trunk" están reservadas para este "Eje de Transporte".
Se había modificado anteriormente, pero fue revertido.
eggie (2025-03-09 07:29:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
aharvey (2025-03-10 02:51:49+00:00): A shame to loose the address type qualifier, I know for the Vicmap import we dropped this due to complexity but in this case it was surveyed.
I'm also not sure if there are some mixed used buildings with commercial and residential that would have both Shop 1 and Unit 1 within the same address.

I think it should be okay to do `addr:unit=Shop 1`

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:*#Detailed_subkeys mentions in the US there is no consensus on including the designator
TheSwavu (2025-03-10 03:17:07+00:00): There were 9 uses of addr:shop in Australia and 489,000 of addr:unit.
TheSwavu (2025-03-10 07:30:41+00:00): Turns out the global usage of addr:shop is 13. There is also only about 1100 addr:unit with "shop" in it https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/203S.
aharvey (2025-03-10 12:16:08+00:00): Okay, I think using `addr:unit` makes it more compatible with existing tools, just think we should have some way to capture the unit type/qualifier/designation.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 04:27:17+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164574290
Baloo Uriza (2025-03-10 18:37:15+00:00): Esri imagery seems to be the newest and doesn't show buildings yet, but the one you drew appears to be mostly in the street and straddling two lots.

You can create just a single node with "house=detached" if you're not sure on the size or outline of a house.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163388257
Allison P (2025-03-10 20:23:54+00:00): I think house=detached is preferred in Ireland or something like that. building=detached is used more in the US
Baloo Uriza (2025-03-10 23:08:26+00:00): Correct, I had a braino, too.