piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
9_tab (2026-06-10 12:00:21+00:00): "subarea" was the correct role for most relations. Of the member members only  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1214963541 is a way, so this results in showing the area of Lepontine Alps=Swiss Alps . Beyond reverting this changeset, I'm not sure how to fix this completely.
9_tab (2026-06-10 22:10:13+00:00): check https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20172352/history/9
eggie (2026-02-06 12:04:02+00:00): Dag Geowol,

Zo te zien heb je geen rekening gehouden met de wandelroutes. Die zijn nu onderbroken.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-06 12:09:25+00:00): Wandelroutes hersteld
eggie (2026-02-06 12:13:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178182261#map=15/52.40891/4.59726&layers=N
Znaika (2026-02-17 15:01:04+00:00): Bitte die Teilefonnummer immer in dem internationalen Format eintragen! z.B,. +49 2103 9776248 Ländercode mit + Zeichen, Ortsvorwahl getrennt mit Leerzeichen vorne und dahinten. Rufnummer ohne Leerzeichen
whb (2026-02-07 22:54:56+00:00): Guten Tag,

diese Änderung ist nicht korrekt, da die Straße aktuell für längere Zeit umgebaut wird.
Siehe auch: https://www.heidelberg.de/HD/Presse/26_01_2026+bahnstadt_+eppelheimer+strasse+wird+zwischen+bauhaus+und+koelle+zoo+umgestaltet.html

Viele Grüße
whb
Tinetto (2026-02-11 15:44:04+00:00): Hi whb, 

Thank you for making the corrections, and for letting me know. I referred to the GPS traces of the past month in my edit. Looking only to the past week’s traces, I see that they are also aligned with the source you provided. I will be more aware to better capture these temporal changes in my future edits.
eggie (2026-02-06 12:23:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
mavl (2026-02-07 07:25:57+00:00): Здравствуйте. Возможно, опечатка в названии улицы.
Ozon OSM12 (2026-02-07 07:38:06+00:00): Добрый день. Прошу прощения, исправила. Спасибо
PizzaTreeIsland (2026-02-06 11:57:25+00:00): Hello, 
Thank you for adding all the walking routes! 
Please note that the correct tag to use is dog, not dogs. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:dog. 
I fixed them already, so don't worry, but please keep this in mind for future additions. 

Thank you and happy mapping!
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-07 23:52:49+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7746685475
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264944840

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-08 01:13:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7746685475
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264944840

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-08 02:32:55+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7746685475
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264944840

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-08 03:43:07+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7746685475
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264944840

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-08 04:53:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7746685475
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264944840

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NTTrailsLSE (2026-02-06 12:06:03+00:00): Thank you for picking up the tagging error on the trails at Sheffield Park!
eggie (2026-02-06 12:22:19+00:00): Dag Andre..
Heb je wel rekening met routerelatie gehouden...
https://knooppuntnet.nl/nl/analysis/changeset/178184490/6975784
Waarom zo'n groot gebied

Mvg
eggie
eggie (2026-02-06 12:33:55+00:00): Knooppuntroute 01-5 in Gasselte hersteld. Is het jou bekend dat je met iD geen routerelaties kunt bewerken?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-06 12:36:02+00:00): Andre.. Ben toch benieuwd waarom je zo weinig reageert op opmerkingen van medemappers?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-06 12:39:18+00:00): oneway=yes op het kruispunt verwijderd.
Waarom daar oneway=yes in Gasselte?
ChrissW-R1 (2026-04-18 22:47:33+00:00): This is by no means "arbitrary". The region is clearly documented in numerous sources. Only its exact boundaries are disputed.
Hugoren Martinako (2026-04-19 09:22:21+00:00): "clearly documented", first off, it's not a region. Period. No region, no borders.

Name came from the plastic-made greenhouses, and became famous due to a spanish TV show. Since there is no way to set the boundaries, a node is the only thing we could add.

The closest semiofficial (not even official, but discussed) region we could establish is the "Poniente Almeriense", a county, but its borders spans way beyond the limits you set.

Whenever you can't set properly the borders fo anything, in OSM we should add just a node, because no mapper is any authority to determine any boundary drawing.
ChrissW-R1 (2026-04-19 12:56:57+00:00): Okay, fair enough, you’re certainly right about the very unclear and dubious boundaries. So a node is entirely reasonable.

My goal isn’t to force this relation into the database. Rather, I simply think it makes sense to include it in the database as a landmark. A relation has the advantage over a node of also representing the area’s extent.

All in all, I would now add it as a node.
ChrissW-R1 (2026-04-19 13:14:41+00:00): Re-added in https://osm.org/changeset/181537676

After re-check the the wiki site of place=region and place=locality, I decided to continue to tag it as region.
kabelhaai (2026-05-11 19:39:18+00:00): Bedankt voor uw input. Ter info: snelheidsbeperkingen kan u heel simpel ingeven via https://mapcomplete.org/maxspeed.html
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:42:24+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/350835760 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Zonwering fabriek"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-16 05:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178610721
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
k2101 (2026-02-06 12:50:52+00:00): W nazwie jest oczywiście omyłka. Chodzi o Kombornię.
Marek-M (2026-02-06 13:10:23+00:00): Cześć, widzę, że dodajesz sporo rzeczek i strumieni. Dzięki za pomoc w tworzeniu OSM :)

Czy mógłbyś ograniczać liczbę węzłów na liniach? Dużo linii prostych lub prawie prostych mapujesz z mikrozakrętami albo po prostu ze zbędnymi węzłami na prostej linii.

Jest to spore utrudnienie przy późniejszych edycjach takiego elementu a zarazem jest to zbędna nadmiarowość danych. Strumyki na pewno nie płyną aż takimi zygzakami :)

Tutaj możesz sprawdzić jak na 25 liniach odchudziłem te strumyki o 512 węzłów i prawie nie ma znaku zmiany ich geometrii:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=178186873
Rainero (2026-03-16 20:09:36+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179969672
(unzulässige Quelle)
aaronq227 (2026-02-12 17:21:54+00:00): Hi jafarbeek,

I noticed a stretch of highway was updated from highway=trunk to highway=motorway in this changeset. The OSM Wiki states that motorways are “a restricted access major divided highway”  meaning they are free of traffic signals, intersections, or property access (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway). Whereas trunk is for "high-performance or high-importance roads that don't meet the requirements for motorway” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrunk). Since there are several access points along this stretch of highway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11938604042, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11941100969, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/274871454 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11948521132), the trunk classification seems more appropriate here. With that in mind, would you be open to changing this back to trunk? 

Thank you and I look forward to hearing from you.
Robert46798 (2026-03-19 20:06:07+00:00): Hallo PappaSde,

ich habe mir mal den Änderungssatz angesehen, weil du die entsprechende Option beim hochladen angegeben hast.

Was war denn das Ziel der Änderung? Der Änderungssatzkommentar ist für mich nicht ganz eindeutig. Da du auf dem Fußweg den Zugang für Fußgänger und Fahrradfahrer auf "yes" gesetzt hast, nehme ich an, man kommt dort wieder lang? Da die Stelle immer noch als Baustelle gekennzeichnet ist, wird die Änderung vermutlich bei den meisten Routern ignoriert werden.
Gemäß Wiki hast du für die Fahrbahn den Zugang auf "Geduldete Zugangsberechtigung für die Öffentlichkeit durch den Eigentümer. Die Erlaubnis oder Duldung kann der Eigentümer jedoch jederzeit widerrufen. " geändert. Ich weiß nicht, wie es in deinem Editor bezeichnet war. Für eine L-Straße klingt das aber eher falsch.

Falls du noch ein paar Informationen bereitstellst, kann ich die Änderungen auch übernehmen, oder dich bei der Umsetzung unterstützen.

Viele Grüße,
Robert
eggie (2026-02-06 13:10:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
HAALAND_ (2026-02-06 13:02:22+00:00): 十分抱歉 我搞错了地点 它没有被拆除 我等一会就恢复回来
NeisBot (2026-02-06 16:46:11+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (5 changesets) shows that 524 of your last 653 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23762072
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:42:28+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13529056351 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cleaning services office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-16 05:33:05+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178456430
eggie (2026-02-06 13:15:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Gebouwen zijn import van uit het Kadaster. De afmetingen kloppen meestal wel. Je kunt niet gebouwen uitlijnen op grond van een schuin genomen  luchtfoto

MVG
eggie
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Yzeak_Newton (2026-02-06 13:55:41+00:00): Ah Dank voor die informatie en het snelle bericht.
eggie (2026-02-06 13:57:33+00:00): In editor iD zit ook een laag van de BGT. Dan kun je bebouwing precies uitlijnen.
Mapse
eggie (2026-02-06 16:24:16+00:00): Volgens mij heb je het welkomstbericht nog niet ontvangen... Bij deze..
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:40:27+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 35 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/784248335 v1 | 14 crossings
https://osm.org/way/784248333 v1 | 11 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7325928057 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178187266
NeisReview (2026-02-16 05:33:26+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178360843
one_half_3544 (2026-02-21 17:50:04+00:00): Please don't add natural=peak to mountain_pass=yes, those are different entities
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5605661199/history#map=19/42.228654/79.561299
eggie (2026-02-06 13:20:09+00:00): Beste.. Op een fietspad mag gewoon gewandeld worden in Nederland.
bicycle=designated hoort niet op een fietspad. het is immers een fietspad. 

Ik pas even weer wat aan. Ga er van uit dat niet alles verkeerd is in OSM accestagging.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-06 14:25:36+00:00): Denk inderdaad bicycle=use_sidepath.. en dan alleen voor het bruggedeelte. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2026-02-06 14:28:22+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast als bovenstaand.
Yzeak_Newton (2026-02-06 16:09:25+00:00): Je was me voor ;) Lijkt me zo goed, bedankt!
jack walker2 (2026-02-07 03:16:33+00:00): 不用致歉，修改了就好，秦皇岛市几乎无人更新打理 以至于数据相当老旧 有太多需要补充更新的内容了
HAALAND_ (2026-02-07 13:31:49+00:00): @jack walker2 谢谢您的指点，我也发现了秦皇岛市数据的老旧，以及感谢您对秦皇岛市的编辑，辛苦了!
HAALAND_ (2026-02-07 13:32:45+00:00): @jack walker2  谢谢您的指点，我也发现了秦皇岛市数据的老旧，以及感谢您对秦皇岛市的编辑，辛苦了!
silversurfer83 (2026-02-06 14:12:55+00:00): Hi Edward,

you asked for review on this edit. As I see it, you've done so before but at least one of the suggestions that were made did not manifest.

- private pools need access=private

- please do not edit things in England and Zambia in one session. It is really annoying and not helpful. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

- you deleted objects to add them at the same location. Please don't do that. If something isn't accurate please improve it. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/662750991 can you please fix that?

happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178187924
Syl (2026-02-06 16:43:10+00:00): Bonjour, le CeGiDD de Saint-Étienne était déjà présent : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7044461316
rempshaener (2026-02-06 19:39:28+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe keine Anmerkungen.

Viele Grüße
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:40:29+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 44 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1474752592 v1 | 25 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1474752593 v1 | 10 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1474752590 v1 | 6 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178188009
NeisReview (2026-02-16 05:33:26+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178526767
Higashimado (2026-02-06 14:39:13+00:00): 您好，欢迎加入 OSM 社区~ 可以加入社群讨论：
https://osmchina.org/pages/community/community_overview.html

若不确定编辑时应当使用的标签或值，可参照 OSM Wiki 或大陆其他地区的范例；另外按 Q 可以直角化编辑对象

编辑愉快~
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:40:29+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/501663462 v9 | 11 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1674860564 v2
https://osm.org/node/3068022836 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178188117
NeisReview (2026-02-16 05:33:27+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178230291
Frans S (2026-02-06 16:17:26+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
We welcome you as a new mapper.
You did  not join the easiest project.
The tracks you located are no roads but rivers/streams. 
When you take a close look you will see no traces of traffic but traces of (intermitted) waterways.
I corrected them.
Best regards
rempshaener (2026-02-06 19:40:12+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe keine Anmerkungen.

Viele Grüße
eggie (2026-02-06 13:51:11+00:00): Dag Y..  Wanneer een bedrijf verdwijnt zal het adres nog steeds bestaan. Ik heb het weer hersteld.
MVG
eggie
Yzeak_Newton (2026-02-06 13:59:41+00:00): Excuus, ik was geinformeerd dat het pand ook geen functie meer had en daarmee het adres was verwijderd.
Na controle in het BAG zie ik dat het adres inderdaad nog bestaat.
eggie (2026-02-06 14:02:40+00:00): Yep... alle begin is moeilijk.
Die uitgegeven adressen blijven meestal bestaan.
Wellicht komt er weer iets nieuws hier.
Gr eggie
Norbert Dichter (2026-02-10 19:43:32+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178188451
Rainero (2026-03-16 20:06:30+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179969354
(unzulässige Quelle)
rempshaener (2026-02-06 19:40:46+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe keine Anmerkungen.

Viele Grüße
grzegorz75jan (2026-02-06 21:06:06+00:00): Access=no czy bardziej access=private.
Dotyczy wszelkiego ruchu, piesi, rowery, pojazdy czy może pasowało by motor_vehicle=forestry.
Są tam jakieś znaki, tabliczki. Na jakiej faktycznej podstawie jest ta edycja.
Grzegorz Orzeł (2026-02-07 20:18:19+00:00): Edycja na podstawie znajomości właścicieli. Droga prywatna, gruntowa z bramką na wjeździe.
Korekta z powodu błędnego wyznaczania tras przez GPS do msc. Krosna
grzegorz75jan (2026-02-08 06:57:53+00:00): Rozumiem i dziękuję za odpowiedź.
rempshaener (2026-02-06 19:41:38+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe keine Anmerkungen.

Viele Grüße
ivanbranco (2026-02-06 14:52:34+00:00): Ciao, forse era il caso di mantenere quantomeno i civici, nel caso non fossero duplicati (hai controllato?).

Inoltre se erano negozi, si potevano cambiare in shop=vacant, così almeno si mantenevano alcune informazioni come ad esempio wheelchair=limited, se ora dovesse aprire un nuovo negozio questa informazione sarebbe persa.

In generale è sempre meglio fare attenzione con le modifiche meccaniche: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Automated_edits

buon mapping
rempshaener (2026-02-06 19:42:44+00:00): Hallo,
auch hier: keine Anmerkungen.
Viele Grüße
trial (2026-02-07 22:15:52+00:00): Bonjour, comme la page l'indique, CeGIDD c'est le nom, Ch de Bretagne Sud etc., c'est plus de l'adresse. Utile hors d'une carte, mais ici on a une base de données goéspatialisée. Là le point est dans l'Hôpital.
rempshaener (2026-02-06 19:43:19+00:00): Hallo,
keine Anmerkungen.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2026-02-06 19:44:32+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe keine Anmerkungen.

Viele Grüße
RolandHUN_Mapper (2026-02-06 16:14:26+00:00): Hi!
I'm so glad you restored the changesets. I started fixing the gematria errors after a bad import from another map editor, but I started to give up. Thanks for restoring the bad changes. :)
Frans S (2026-03-19 13:10:49+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
your changesets are reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 


-------------------------------------------------------------
Why did you consequently map and tag highways as  unclassified highways, despite they are often that narrow that you only can call them a path?
You do this on many tasks.
Please follow the tagging mentioned in this wiki

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
Mostly, the tracks are not more than a path.

To measure the width of a road in ID editor 

First, draw a line between the shoulders of a track . 
Then you can press [Ctrl]+[Shift]+[M] to turn on the measurement panel and read the result.

Best regards, and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178190851
Jordi MF (2026-02-06 23:36:24+00:00): Hola. La licencia de Wikipedia no es compatible con OSM y no podemos copiar datos de Wikipedia. Por lo tanto, esta edición no es correcta.
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:42:32+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1302134653 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Travel agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-16 05:33:06+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178319226
Jordi MF (2026-02-06 23:36:27+00:00): Hola. La licencia de Wikipedia no es compatible con OSM y no podemos copiar datos de Wikipedia. Por lo tanto, esta edición no es correcta.
kingkingHK (2026-02-07 03:35:00+00:00): I thought we don't do `=bus_station` for on-street termini?

Anyway, for future reference: https://hkbus.fandom.com/wiki/%E5%BA%B7%E6%80%A1%E8%8A%B1%E5%9C%92%E7%B8%BD%E7%AB%99

(Also I doubt the "guys from HKBusFandom" will notice this note/changeset, so the minibus stop might never get mapped if we don't do it.)
vectorial8192 (2026-02-07 04:56:48+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong/Transport/Public_transport

> 至於泊街的巴士總站（有調度功能），[...]
> For a roadside terminus (with operation arrangement ability) [...]

does that count?

also, you never know, some pages at HKBusFandom doesn't have much OSM integration, while some other pages have very strong integration. I believe their side works similar to this side.
Kovoschiz (2026-02-07 10:57:52+00:00): That's the bad advice we are talking about. `=bus_station` should at least have a dedicated u-turn road.