piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Strubbl (2025-07-04 15:33:43+00:00): Hi mfabi,
du hast hier nicht das Gewässer erweitert, sondern den kartierten Badebereich. Der ist eigentlich von Seezeichen gekennzeichnet. Und ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass der über die Fahrrinne erweitert wurde.
Sollen wir das rückgängig machen?
Strubbl (2025-07-17 19:39:56+00:00): revertiert https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169078074
Strubbl (2025-07-04 15:37:01+00:00): Hi mfabi, bitte nicht einfach Dinge in OSM löschen, sondern bearbeiten. Löschen ist meist nicht richtig. Das Tagging anpassen schon eher. Ich habe deine Änderung mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168490983 rückgängig gemacht.
Wenn das Tagging nciht stimmt, bitte dies korrigieren. Durch's Löschen des Objekts geht sonst auch der Name verloren, der hier kartiert ist.
Viele Grüße
bananabananasplit (2025-07-05 18:27:23+00:00): Pourquoi mettre operator sur les rails, alors qu'il est sur la relation ?
AurélienQ (2025-07-06 07:08:03+00:00): Bonjour, 
C'est car très souvent il arrive que l'opérateur de l'infrastructure ne soit pas le même que celui des véhicules l'empruntant. Par exemple la LGV entre Paris et Lyon a pour opérateur SNCF Réseau, mais il y a (ou devrait avoir) des relation d'itinéraires de TGV Inoui, TGV Ouigo, TGV Lyria, Flèche Rouge,... qui sont tous des opérateurs différents, mais cette fois de matériel roulant.

L'ouverture à la concurrence qui est de plus en plus effective en France, va nous amener à avoir des tags operators différent pour les voies, les trains, les centre de maintenances et j'en passe. C'est donc une info intéressante.
TrickyFoxy (2025-07-04 20:25:24+00:00): Не копируйте данные с других карт
citrula (2025-07-03 22:31:51+00:00): For this task, you should merge the existing reservoir node with the new area you drew. You can do this in Rapid/iD by selecting both, right clicking, and selecting "merge".

I went ahead and did this for you for this dam. Let me know if you have any questions :)
Lambig (2025-07-12 15:32:53+00:00): Bonjour,
A priori, cette mise-à-jour a cassé une relation cyclable nationale (la V40) à cause de la suppression du way entre la rue du Malconseil et la rue Drouet. Je vois aussi un problème avec la rue Drouet qui est en sens unique et en impasse à la fois (ce qui est théoriquement impossible). Est-il possible d'avoir plus de précisions pour réparer l'itinéraire cyclable ? Merci
user_22768934 (2025-07-12 16:08:27+00:00): bonjour la rue Drouet a toujours été en sens unique et voici des photos https://www.leparisien.fr/eure-et-loir-28/la-vente-la-destruction-et-la-reconstruction-de-limmeuble-rue-drouet-a-epernon-divisent-17-02-2022-GCQP34YCZ5F73IGPRQ3PF7NM2E.php.
user_22768934 (2025-07-12 16:19:51+00:00): et la rue Paul Painlevé reste ouverte pour l instant https://www.lechorepublicain.fr/epernon-28230/faits-divers/le-batiment-qui-a-ete-detruit-par-les-flammes-a-epernon-a-ete-mis-en-securite-par-deux-arretes_14711881/
Lambig (2025-07-12 16:43:00+00:00): Ok il s'agît donc d'une route barrée. Pour maintenir les relations, je pense qu'il est mieux de laisser le chemin et de plutôt lui ajouter un tag access=no avec une note qui explique. Il y a aussi un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par la rue qui a été supprimée d'OSM. D'ailleurs, est-il possible d'y passer à pied ou à vélo ?
user_22768934 (2025-07-12 16:53:20+00:00): oui !!! à ce jour il est possible de passer en vélo et à pied et je rouvrirai la rue après travaux . je ne connais pas la date malheureusement. belle soirée à vous
StC (2025-07-24 11:08:20+00:00): Bonjour,

j'arrive moi aussi sur ce changeset en raison d'un itinéraire brisé (pédestre, celui-ci). Comme l'indique Lambig, la bonne solution est de mettre access=no sur le segment concerné, plutôt que de supprimer le segment.
user_22768934 (2025-07-24 11:47:22+00:00): bonjour faites  la modification à votre convenance . Mais il ne faut pas d’accès pour les voitures et le camions ,ils seraient dans une impasse et c'est arrivé a plusieurs reprises . merci
StC (2025-07-24 12:16:33+00:00): J'ai fait de mon mieux sur la rue du Malconseil, en ne touchant pas/peu à la rue Drouet.
user_22768934 (2025-07-24 12:29:55+00:00): bonjour .La rue du Malconseil n'est pas accessible à cette endroit,elle est barrée . Il faudrait  descendre  par la rue de la Regratterie et remonter la rue Paul Painlevé
StC (2025-07-24 12:42:06+00:00): Pas accessible à qui ? A tous ? aux véhicules ? J'avais compris des échanges ci-dessus que les piétons et vélos peuvent passer.
user_22768934 (2025-07-24 12:49:20+00:00): oui dans la rue Drouet ,pas dans  la rue du Malconseil la chaussée est éboulée
 c'est visible sur la photo du journal.
user_22768934 (2025-07-24 12:56:40+00:00): il faut éviter la rue du Malconseil
https://www.lechorepublicain.fr/epernon-28230/actualites/nouvelle-reglementation-en-cur-de-ville-d-epernon_12611957/
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2026-02-15 10:07:03+00:00): living street designation is meant for streets where cars share the same space as pedestrians. This street has physical separation between cars and pedestrians meaning it doesn't fit the designation.
chath_tsu (2026-02-15 17:37:31+00:00): yes thank you for the comment, I agree! I have since looked more closely at the definition of living streets and now working on a project to address living streets that are not in fact living streets
chath_tsu (2026-02-19 21:37:26+00:00): @Spaghetti_Monster🍝 and related - I made a challenge on MR to verify living street designations mpr.lt/c/54158
joel56dt (2025-07-03 21:31:28+00:00): I have fixed the tagging for this turn restriction in CS 1572449432
Мистер Твистер (2025-07-04 17:04:22+00:00): зачем исправил?
Grass-snake (2025-07-06 07:34:41+00:00): Названия более привычные, чем если статусная часть в начале. 
Индустриальная улица
Бакальская улица
Что касается alt_name без статусной части, вообще не понял зачем было сделано.
Syl (2025-07-03 19:44:53+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai des doutes sur la pertinence de cet ajout. À certains endroits les rails et la route passent au même endroit et sont donc sur le même chemin dans OSM, hors à ma connaissance la STAS ne s'occupe que de l'entretien des rails mais pas des routes.
AurélienQ (2025-07-04 14:48:55+00:00): Il y a en effet des chances, mais dans ce cas ajouter un des deux opérateur de l'objet est toujours mieux que de n'en avoir aucun. Je ne pense donc pas que ma modif est factuellement erronée.
Si à l'avenir quelqu'un rajoutera cette info il suffira de la mettre dans le même tag 'operator' après un " ; ".
user_5359 (2025-07-04 06:42:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/12974626638. Did you have service every day or only on sundays? In the last case, the day abbreviation ‘Su’ is still missing before the time (which we write in 24-hour notation, by the way)
Beuhlig (2025-07-04 10:22:27+00:00): My apologies, I’m still learn how to do this stuff. So service is typically only on Sunday, with the exception of Advent & Lent in which case there may be Wednesday service.
Joseph R P (2025-07-06 16:46:14+00:00): Hello, Route 50 through Warrensburg should not be tagged as a motorway. This segment is very short and isn't entirely a freeway. highway=trunk and expressway=yes would be the best tag for this segment.
eggie (2025-07-03 20:06:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Supaplex030 (2025-07-05 10:46:53+00:00): Hey Lordi0814, danke für deine vielen Ergänzungen/Aktualisierungen an den Straßenbrunnen :)
Liebe Grüße
Alex
Tatfahren (2025-07-03 20:22:25+00:00): Sieht richtig aus, beim Verschieben eines Knotens kann man ja auch nicht soviel falsch machen.
eggie (2025-07-04 04:49:01+00:00): Dag jehojakim,
Alle biebinfo heb ik ook verplaatst van het schoolgebouw Ds. Hasperschool.
Wat is de naam van de 2de school.
Je had alleen maar amenity=school zonder namen toegevoegd aan de adresnodes?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-07-04 04:58:06+00:00): instellingen met naam naar adresnodes verplaatst
streckenkundler (2025-07-03 20:56:02+00:00): vergessen: auch Besuch vor Ort, ich hatte nur auf die Luftbilder gewartet...
qaz789 (2025-09-27 08:50:35+00:00): przystanek początkowy Zakopane Mała Łąka fizycznie znajduje się w: 49°16'41.6"N 19°54'21.3"E,
przystanek wysiadkowy jest gdzieś w tej zatoczce w okolicy: 49°16'40.9"N 19°54'16.3"E
natomiast nie będę tego poprawiał bo nie ruszam relacji
TranslatorPS (2025-09-27 11:11:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172520872
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172520999
Mówisz, masz! ;)
ivanbranco (2025-07-28 12:08:00+00:00): Ciao Mirco,

cosa sarebbe "Casa Bologna"? Non ci sono altri tag che descrivano cosa sia (a parte quelli dell'indirizzo).

Grazie e buon mapping
Mirco Zuppiroli (2025-07-28 12:22:59+00:00): Ciao, guarda chiedo scusa, pensavo fosse un tag privato, ma a quanto pare.....

Mi spiace, provo ad eliminare, un cordiale saluto.

Mirco
Mirco Zuppiroli (2025-07-28 12:25:45+00:00): Perdonami, ma non mi sembra sia ancora presente. Sbaglio ?
ivanbranco (2025-07-28 12:28:28+00:00): Era ancora presente, ho sistemato io ora. Grazie per la risposta!
Mirco Zuppiroli (2025-07-28 12:47:16+00:00): No grazie a te, mi scuso ancora. Ciao
os-emmer (2025-07-15 20:06:15+00:00): Hello Badojo,
I think you made a typo in the wikidata info here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1411981363
Could you check that? Thanks.
Badojo (2025-07-15 20:15:14+00:00): Yes, I'll fix it.
Thanks for noticing!
user_5359 (2025-08-06 16:17:20+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1290178867. Whar is the mean of the tag highway = 16.5 ? This is a part of a building.
btwhite92 (2025-07-05 07:40:05+00:00): Hi there,
This stretch of Pyramid Hwy is significantly more important than nearby 'secondary' roads and does not belong in the same "bin". It is one of the most heavily trafficked surface arteries in the metropolitan area and is slated for an expressway upgrade soon. I understand the goal is to have a connected classification network, but we're getting into silly territory here where a 55 mph, multi-lane, partially controlled access highway with an AADT of nearly 40k is classified under, for example, W 7th/E Golden Valley, a windy 2-lane back-ish road with under 10k AADT.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-07-05 13:05:52+00:00): Okay, I'll go change it back.
Joseph R P (2025-07-05 13:17:23+00:00): I would say that this is one of the rare exceptions in which a primary route can terminate with no other connections to a primary road or another highway of a higher classification, due to geographical restrictions. Traffic traveling between Reno/Sparks and Spanish Spanish Springs is funneled into Pyramid Way, which is a very crucial high-traffic commuter route, especially south of La Posada Drive. The only other major highway linking to Spanish Springs would be going 447 to 446 via Wadsworth and Nixon, but these are primarily used by traffic heading to the nearby smaller communities or local rural sprawl.

The other examples of primary spurs like these would be Lake Mead Parkway between Henderson and Lake Las Vegas—aside from the lower-traffic local roads like Galleria, the other way to reach the area would be taking Lake Mead Boulevard or Northshore Road, which are only accessible to Lake Mead NRA traffic—Route 169 to Moapa Valley (for the same reasons as Lake Mead Parkway), and Route 227 between Elko and Spring Creek, as there's no other paved highway between the two.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-07-05 18:18:28+00:00): Okay. I've only been to Reno once, so I'm not as familiar with its road network as I am with Las Vegas's xD.
Speaking of Lake Mead Parkway and Boulevard, I did connect their primary classifications because, as you mentioned earlier, it's one of the only roads that can access Lake Mead, and having Lake Mead Parkway's primary classification just end at a random intersection felt off to me. Is there a reason the primary designation ended at Lake Las Vegas Parkway specifically?
Joseph R P (2025-07-05 18:35:50+00:00): Lake Las Vegas Pkwy is the main road into the community, and as a secondary road, it would be the last major road that Lake Mead Pkwy intersects before it reaches the gate into the Lake Mead NRA. An argument for it to be extended to the gate could be made, like how the US Routes do before entering Yellowstone, but I figure it would make more sense for it to terminate at the last major populated place and the intersection where most traffic would be splitting off.

I had the main roads through the Lake Mead Rec Area upgraded to primary in the past but downgraded them to secondary a couple years ago since they're realistically only used by traffic local to the park rather than by through traffic.

On a more unrelated note regarding the Lake Mead Boulevard section you upgraded to primary, I think it could make sense to leave a primary spur from Nellis Blvd to Hollywood Blvd, since it's the main E-W route through Sunrise Manor and has a much higher AADT than the rest of the secondary roads in the area and supports more commercial development as well. Though, I could see a possible primary connection along Hollywood between Lake Mead and Boulder Highway in the future once the new bridge over the wash opens up and thus creates a new eastern bypass for the valley.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-07-19 05:08:34+00:00): Sorry I didn't see this earlier (why does Gmail mark some of these replies as "Promotional"?). I went ahead and changed all the roads I edited back to secondary. Since you upgraded Hollywood Boulevard anyway, I extended Charleston's primary designation to Hollywood Boulevard since it still appears to be a major throughfare. Also, a new bridge over the Las Vegas Wash connecting Lake Mead (I assume Blvd, AKA SR 147) to Boulder Highway? I've literally never heard of this before. Where did you hear this from?
Joseph R P (2025-07-19 15:23:19+00:00): Here's the project: https://www.clarkcountynv.gov/news/news-detail-t28-r1033

The project has started, but the bridge isn't under construction yet. Currently, they're working on the first phase, which is mostly just improvements along Wiesner Way, including realigning it towards the wash, building the roundabout at the Silver Bowl, and currently they're widening the rest of the road and working on the Galleria intersection. The second phase is in 2026, which will be the beginning of the bridge construction.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-07-19 17:12:50+00:00): Okay, I'll go check it out. Thanks!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-04 10:48:35+00:00): Bonjour!

Merci pour les vérifications dans la région.

Si possible, mettre bicycle=dismount à moins qu'il y ait une pancarte interdisant même le transport du vélo à pied (ce qui est très très rare)
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-04 10:49:57+00:00): Ce commentaire est valable pour tous les petits segments piéton, pas nécessairement celui-ci seulement.

Merci et bonne journée!
LGloaguen (2025-07-04 14:14:59+00:00): C'était un sentier temporaire qui faisait la jonction entre deux trottoirs. Donc, de mon point de vue, un substitut de trottoir et trottoir=no-bicycle. Mais tout cela est obsolète, ce chemin n'existe plus. Le chemin piéton a été refait en béton. J'irai voir sur place (il n'est pas droit en raison des piliers du REM).
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-04 14:18:23+00:00): Oui merci! C’était un commentaire général pour les autres changements ailleurs dans la région. Merci!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-04 11:07:50+00:00): Ce passage est nécessaire pour que les vélos puissent accéder à la Rue Samson. Je vais mettre dismount sur les passages piéton à la place.
LGloaguen (2025-07-04 14:43:10+00:00): Oui. De mon point de vue, ce passage (sans traduction physique) devrait être déplacé dans l'axe d'un des 2 passages piétons et, en tout logique, doublé sur l'autre. Bonne journée !
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-04 14:45:14+00:00): Oui exactement ce que j’ai fait 👍
LGloaguen (2025-07-04 14:51:34+00:00): Super. Merci !
Chris Fleming (2025-07-09 20:28:26+00:00): Thanks, that looks fine to me.
SOSOwner (2025-07-03 22:45:40+00:00): Because, yeah... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout
Agoraphilic (2025-07-07 02:22:08+00:00): Hey thanks for adding this. I will probably get around soon to doing the associated on-the-ground mapping of this since it is in the neighborhood.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168463266
jumbanho (2025-07-08 16:42:05+00:00): My pleasure, I'm slowly trying to add all the sidewalks to St. Paul.
aharvey (2025-07-04 00:29:31+00:00): hi please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

In OpenStreetMap roads on private property are still mapped but as access=private which is usually then shown on maps as a private road or avoided by routing.

I've reverted this change to restore the driveways, but also added the access=private tag.
LordGarySugar (2025-08-01 00:38:03+00:00): Changeset reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169794652 - you removed the pit lane from the circuit relation without explanation
martien-176 (2025-07-05 19:40:58+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping.

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Most buildings do have right angled corners and we need our mapping to reflect that. Accurate building footprints are important because building sizes are often used to estimate population sizes for an area to conduct humanitarian activities. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. 

To improve for next time, please zoom in close enough when tracing to avoid buildings sharing nodes or else overlapping. If buildings need to be adjusted or improved later on, it is much harder to do that if they share nodes with nearby features.

Please check out these sources for more info: 
- Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
- Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ 
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT global validator.
osm_Ralef (2025-07-06 17:56:37+00:00): Hi Steglitz,
kannst du diesen Edit mal checken? Mir ist über den Renderer von openstreetmap.org aufgefallen, das die Waldsymbole über vielen Flächen im Wald liegen. Scheinbar ist dieses Gebiet Mitglied von 4 Multiploygonen und mindestens 19320348 scheint mir überflüssig zu sein. Da ich aber ja nicht wissen kann, was  du vorhast bitte ich höflichst um eine Überprüfung.

Gruß Ralf
steglitz (2025-07-07 03:17:22+00:00): Hallo Ralf,
das ist mir auch aufgefallen, und ich glaube, ich hab das Problem gelöst. Es kam durch eine teilweise Duplizierung des Multipolygons. Ich hab die Duplikate zusammengeführt und das Polygon in kleinere Teile aufgeteilt. Jetzt sollte es einfacher zu bearbeiten und zu verwalten sein. Danke für den Hinweis, lass mich wissen, wenn noch Probleme auftreten.
Viele Grüße
Steglitz
Kugelbaum (2025-07-10 04:05:31+00:00): Hallo,
Schau mal nördlich von Kordel, etwas zu weiß dort seit kurzem.
steglitz (2025-07-10 08:10:37+00:00): Kannst du mir einen OSM-Link schicken, der genau auf die Stelle zoomt, die du siehst?
steglitz (2025-07-10 09:31:58+00:00): Ich verstehe jetzt, was du meinst. Das sollte jetzt repariert sein.
NeisBot (2025-07-04 00:30:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-05 19:45:09+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/168536946
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-08 11:47:08+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12976050211/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
angys (2025-10-05 16:21:40+00:00): It should be a watson
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-09 15:42:51+00:00): what "watson" is? Is it some type of shop?
NeisBot (2025-07-04 00:48:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-04 05:16:18+00:00): Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168468566
aharvey (2025-07-07 01:34:21+00:00): I'm of the view that highway=footway should be used for walking paths that have been built and highway=path for just a worn path from usage. In particular if it's signposted as a walking path it gives strength to being higher importance and therefore highway=footway compared with highway=path.

However I realise that other mappers generally use highway=path for any bushwalking track and highway=footway for essentially a non-bushwalking track.

Based on surface=metal and this being part of the major Coastal Walk track, I think highway=footway is better to raise the ranking compared to more minor walking tracks.
bertboy (2025-07-07 05:10:12+00:00): Thanks Andrew for your comments. I agree the OSM descriptions for "footway" and "path" do not make it clear cut which one to use. In truth the Coastal Walk is a mix of different types of construction - some parts fairly natural, some stone paving and some raised boardwalks. I think the "surface=metal" (which I did not use) is from an older generation of this path, which is now gone. I had not appreciated that OSM had not been updated with the re-alignment until after my visit - so I did not record or map where the boardwalk sections are .
NeisBot (2025-07-04 01:38:12+00:00): Hi THE PIONEER CLASSES, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added name tag to a road, identifying it as Konsha-Deohari Rd."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
022 (2025-07-04 03:38:23+00:00): my JOSM crashed when I uploaded and glitched out this changeset so it only uploaded nodes but it's fine because I reuploaded the same file in a new changeset and everything seems to have transferred over. This was just the nodes for the boundary import .
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-04 10:54:45+00:00): Ce changement pourrait briser le routage des vélos puisque le trottoir sur Cavendish sous le viaduc est permis aux vélos. Or en arrivant à l'intersection de Saint-Jacques, les vélos seraient prisonniers sur le trottoir. Je vais remettre bicycle=yes pour permettre la connexion avec la rue à cet endroit. Merci!
LGloaguen (2025-07-04 14:30:35+00:00): Je ne suis pas sûr que ce soit la meilleure façon de faire du routage en l'occurence. Il faudrait au moins couper les passages piétons en deux sections. Parce que là, ça donne cela : https://lcg.net/-partages/osm-canvedish-168466361.jpg
LGloaguen (2025-07-04 14:32:57+00:00): Après, fonctionnellement, ça va. Le routage ne va pas utiliser les impasses ainsi créées. C'est juste que je trouve ça pas beau :-)