piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2023-12-28 16:07:27+00:00): Wanneer je schuift met de kaart on edit modus krijg je vaak schade. Hier heb je een adresnode verplaats naar een parkeerplaats.
Luzandro (2024-05-24 05:44:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4261826
SzymonH (2024-05-24 09:32:58+00:00): Nie wiem jakim cudem ja tego nie zauważyłem tyle miesięcy, ale przystanek Karolin 03 znajduje się w zupełnie innym miejscu. Prawidłowa lokalizacja była wcześniej dodana, wobec czego prośba o przywrócenie tego przystanku na poprzednie miejsce.
SzymonH (2024-05-24 09:33:40+00:00): Dodatkowo w ramach innej edycji w tym samym czasie zniknęły relacje kursów wydłużonych linii 112 do krańca Karolin to proszę też o ich przywrócenie.
Tetryk (2024-05-24 10:58:46+00:00): Rzeczywiście, musiał mnie zasugerować błędny link lokalizacyjny WTP, błędny routing GTFS oraz stare orto z jednokierunkową jedną z ulic. Usunięcie tras mogło wyniknąć z błędnych lub źle przeze mnie zinterpretowanych informacji w tamtym czasie na WTP. Wszystko poprawię.
eggie (2023-12-28 15:40:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
pluton_od (2024-01-01 17:05:21+00:00): Hi Getpin_Com.

Can you please share the source of the data? I didn't see this branch at this location, nor does the official website mentions it.

For the `description` tag, please don't include "subjective evaluations" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description#No_advertising): "Ощадбанк – ваш надійний фінансовий партнер, що має найбільшу мережу відділень серед банків України."

Thanks.
Getpin_Com (2024-03-11 19:31:27+00:00): OK, I will only use objective descriptions for the description tag. The information was provided by the owner of the location.
Filip009 (2023-12-27 22:19:00+00:00): Zdravím, prečo ste odstránili zákazy?
eggie (2023-12-28 15:38:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Larmax (2023-12-27 19:28:27+00:00): Hei, kun lisäät katupysäköintiä erillisinä alueina, muuta olemassa olevat katujen pysäköintitägit parking:*=separate'ksi, jottei pysäköinti olisi kartalla tuplana.
Toni100 (2023-12-28 12:35:34+00:00): Hei! Kiitos, hyvä huomio, käyn korjaamassa :)
HJS_Holten (2023-12-27 14:51:10+00:00): omschrijving: wijz. winkelbergerweg/vrijheidslaan (survey)
Syl (2023-12-27 23:07:55+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé la modification du SIRET et du site web, les deux que vous avais mis ne correspondent pas à cet endroit.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2023-12-28 07:34:39+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour votre correction
Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
arjunaraoc (2023-12-29 08:53:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145578817
HirschKauz (2024-08-04 10:14:25+00:00): hi Voltapark und Willkommen bei openstreetmap :-) 
Vorsicht! Wenn Du access=no setzt, dann darf NIEMAND da hin, meintest Du eventuell access=destination? oder doch motor_vehicle=agricultural? Lies mal hier: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access 
Grüße und weiter viel Spaß
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145578820
Voltapark (2024-08-05 08:41:02+00:00): Hallo, Danke für den Hinweis. Ja nur für Anlieger erlaubt, auch Landwirtschaft. Ich kann das aber irgendwie nicht mehr ändern. Bin ein Greenhorn.
HirschKauz (2024-08-07 16:12:01+00:00): kein Stress, wir hatten alle irgendwann noch Eierschalen hinter den Ohren kleben  ;-)  
Ich schaue mir die Feldwege an. 
Kennst Du schon das deutschsprachige Forum? 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56
Grüße aus Paffendorf ;-)
rumbrummer (2024-08-22 06:14:36+00:00): Are you sure with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16887214
? I think this forbids jus driving the main road. Please see https://kurv.gr/82eS4 as example.
Furthermore restrictions
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16887211
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16887213
seem to be buggy: Via should be a node, not a way.
Trailpapst (2024-08-22 08:44:06+00:00): Thx for your attention. This was wrong. I updated the junction now accordingly. Can you verify?
rumbrummer (2024-08-22 18:09:24+00:00): Thanks for the fast change - the "straight on forbidden" restriction is gone, Kurviger updates OSM changes to its routing machine each 2 days - I will check ASAP. But the buggy restrictions (way instead of node as via) are still there - I am afraid that they will not work properly in routing machines, but I am not an expert.
rumbrummer (2024-08-22 18:19:23+00:00): I removed one of them, please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155620637
wambacher (2023-12-28 10:53:56+00:00): Moin, 
Straßennamen mögen ja sehr wichtig sein, aber eine korrekte PLZ wäre auch ganz nett ;)

https://postcode.wambachers-osm.website/Postcode_2_2_0.html?map=14/52.527739/7.374706&base=OSM&data=WPCHM,PCBDE,WPCDE

Gruß
walter

ps: Auch bei Profis geht schon mal was schief. Passiert mir auch gelegentlich.
Basstoelpel (2024-01-01 19:40:55+00:00): Ich stehe grad auf'm Schlauch. Wie bringe ich die verlinkte page dazu, mir die Fehler anzuzeigen, oder war da jemand schneller?

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
gscholz (2024-01-02 08:15:32+00:00): Hi Реdактор,
the here added gassland widely overlaps with the existing wood areas:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145580137

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-15 22:29:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152740214, 152740288, 152740274, 152740234, 152740192, 152740169, 152740167, 152740249, 152740178 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions by Hamilton 44/Delta Evas ALL, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16207
elsy1 (2024-01-25 08:02:41+00:00): باز هم خرابکاری دیگر لطفا لطفا قبل از اعمال تغییرات وسیع، ویکی اپن استریت را بخوانید قبلا هم در داخل شهرهای دیگر این گونه ویرایش های اشتباه انجام داده بودید و بقیه کاربران با صرف وقتشون ویرایش های اشتباه شما را تصحیح میکردند. در داخل شهر بلوار حداکثر تگ پرایمر قابل قبول است نه بیشتر.
elsy1 (2024-01-25 08:03:22+00:00): اینبار اگر جوابگو نباشید و به کامنت پاسخ ندید مجبور به گزارش حساب شما خواهم شد.
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-15 22:29:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152740214, 152740288, 152740274, 152740234, 152740192, 152740169, 152740167, 152740249, 152740178 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions by Hamilton 44/Delta Evas ALL, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16207
eggie (2023-12-28 16:03:03+00:00): Een bankje heb ik lsogemaakt van een administratieve grens. Best last dat plakken.
mapse
eggie
Hufkratzer (2023-12-28 19:00:34+00:00): Hi,
You have retagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/271711015/history from a building to a riding centre. But on PDOK/Bing it looks like a building. In OSM every building should have a building tag, otherwise it is not rendered as a building on the maps. For specific building types there are different tags available, e.g. building=stable, building=riding_hall. building=barn, ...
I would recommend to create a separate object (area or node) for the riding centre "De Wolvenhoeve", e.g. like here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/703036885
eggie (2023-12-28 19:16:30+00:00): Restored buildingtag
eggie (2023-12-28 19:34:39+00:00): adresnode nr 6 hersteld. 
Je edits.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145581410
Beter niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.
eggie (2023-12-28 19:37:07+00:00): Winkel Stoer in wonen verplaatst naar addesnode. Adres verwijderd.
shoptag toegevoegd.
eggie (2023-12-28 19:39:20+00:00): Adres verwijderd bij garage en samengevoegd met adresnode.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-27 15:40:37+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Szlachecka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11459792139
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11459792140
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11459792141
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11459792142

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rskedgell (2023-12-28 12:00:15+00:00): Thanks for updating this. I've slightly tweaked the tagging in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145616125
paulc007 (2024-01-04 21:01:22+00:00): Many thanks! Still learning about tags, etc.
rskedgell (2024-01-04 21:52:49+00:00): Several years on, so am I :-)
kapazao (2024-06-26 12:26:30+00:00): Hola, por favor ten más cuidado a la hora de renombrar elementos tan importantes como estos, ya que no te fijaste que están el parque natural y el nacional, que son cosas distintas.
Cebderby (2023-12-30 19:21:53+00:00): Hi HaBaSm,
It looks like the badly non-vertical imagery around Buxton has lead you to choose a large offset eg -8.2,-0.8 ? on Bing imagery for much of your mapping.  This kind of offset is only useful temporarily while tracing roofs of a certain height at the town centre, and never for ground level roads, paths etc or at other places where the imagery is non-vertical in a different direction.  For ALL other purposes, the (ground level) offset for Bing imagery looks to be pretty consistently around -1.4,-0.7 or within a fraction of a metre of this around here.
You can check/set this by turning on the 'OSMUK Cadastral' overlay and aligning ground level features (there are usually some pavement edges or low walls around to pick from, avoid anything taller).  Then you can deal with anything taller by tracing around top/gutter line (ignore anything locally taller/shorter like gable or local low roof and imagine where the building would be if flat) then drag the resulting shape to the base of the visible walls.  Don't be tempted to follow the roof one side and the base of walls the other.  If it's right, it should look equally decent with Esri or Bing imagery, although the Bing is clearer. Also the 'q' key will square buildings when you know they are only supposed to contain right angles (typically domestic buildings, garages etc, not many old Buxton buildings though!). I've tidied some stuff back to nice alignment, so all is well and don't be put off.  Please feel free to reply/send message if you need any help/clarification. Happy mapping, Cebderby (Clive)
HaBaSm (2023-12-30 22:16:01+00:00): Hello! Thanks for the tip, the Bing Imagery is quite poor so I did choose and offset that lined up with most of the already mapped buildings. I did think it was quite large whilst selecting it. I make sure I use your suggestion in future! Thanks again!
Cebderby (2023-12-30 22:44:22+00:00): Great.  A few other random thoughts I noted while I think of them:

Try to keep your changeset comments specific, so that you and others can see the basic content and reason for the change; as a rough guide you should be able to look down your list of changes and fairly easily remember which was which and others should be able to see whether they are interested in them. Most of yours are great, but avoid "small adjustment" or similar generic phrases.

We like to keep the history (of ways, and single tagged nodes - but ordinary untagged nodes of ways aren't valuable though) so if you rework a building, road or even a shop node that's already mapped, try to keep the old way/single node and change the tags eg shop to vacant or whatever.  Obviously if there's demolition and rebuilding something else, then delete and re-add as necessary.

A couple of times you've made a building of parts by having untagged closed areas grouped by a building relation.  This is actually not usual, I made the areas into building:part areas and drew an outline around the whole as the building way.  ('building:part' can be used to do 3d buildings which is a whole other area you can look into some time if you fancy it).  Multipolygons are mostly used where there is a hole inside, I put one at one of the school buildings where there's grass in the middle.

You took out the pedestrianised 'linear' way at Spring Gardens (and some connecting side ways).  I've put these back, as OSM is not just one (or more) renders of a map like you see on the OSM website, its really a database of connected ways (etc), and for calculating routes and other purposes the linear ways are more significant.  Also there was a cycle route relation (an ordered list of ways representing a named followable route) down Spring Gardens which got broken, but all is good now.

Have fun mapping,
Cebderby (Clive)
HaBaSm (2023-12-30 23:27:11+00:00): All noted! Apologises I'm still getting to grips with all the nitty gritty in OSM and I'm more than likely going to slip up so I do apologise. Your tips are very helpful and I will look at your corrections to see how you've done things.

Thanks!
woodpeck_repair (2024-01-19 10:57:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146438530 where the changeset comment is: revert remaining edits of vandal Leipziger123
gscholz (2023-12-31 08:26:15+00:00): HI  Henk Nugter,
this changeset has destroyed a water and a wetland relation:


https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=34.00707&lat=0.08797&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145583036

I have just fixed this.
Kind regards
Guido
GerdP (2024-07-02 12:44:33+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Die Kombination Tempo 30 Schild + Zusatzschild 5t bedeutet, dass dort Fahrzeuge mit mehr als 5t nur max. 30 fahren dürfen, also
maxspeed:conditional=30 @ (maxweight > 5t)
Habe das gerade überall entsprechend geändert, Du (bzw. Go Map) hattest 
maxspeed=30 + maxweight=5 
eingetragen.
Werde das gleich ändern.
Andrew Chadwick (2023-12-27 16:22:34+00:00): Replaced with https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16507614
Udarian (2023-12-31 01:15:41+00:00): Question, why are there so many vertex deletions along the coast lines?
ntzm (2024-01-04 09:40:13+00:00): This is apparently a permissive bridleway, so why was horse and bicycle set to no?
Elmo Eldridge (2024-01-04 18:51:08+00:00): @ntzm is correct.  It is signposted as a Public Footpath, but is also a Permissive Bridleway.
Hufkratzer (2023-12-28 18:15:48+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1234636694 ist ein Reitplatz und keine Reitanlage (im Sinne von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding). Für Reitplätze gibt es in iD den Preset mit dem Namen "Reitplatz".
JeroenHoek (2026-05-29 14:12:50+00:00): Voorzichtig met deze panden als je de BAG plugin gebruikt. Van 20 van de 24 is de bouw nooit gestart (van vier enkel de fundering), maar gemeente Noard-east Frsylân sputtert tegen bij een BAG-terugmelding.

Ik heb ze verwijderd, maar zolang ze op 'bouw gestart' staan pakt de BAG plugin ze mee.
E de Wit (2026-05-30 18:55:27+00:00): Komt niet van deze changeset volgens mij.
Op de beelden van 2023 waren funderingswerkzaamheden zichtbaar (bouw gestart)

Men heeft binnen het plan blijkbaar na het plaatsen van de begane grondvloer vier woningen nooit verder gebouwd dan dat.
Logisch dat je ze daardoor nu verwijderd.

Bulk import lijkt van deze changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177033582
te komen.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-12-27 18:10:16+00:00): Please keep your changesets local next time and upload each country separately, thank you.
silversurfer83 (2023-12-27 20:07:51+00:00): As explained in this article

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

thank you
FraukeLeo (2024-03-26 08:20:39+00:00): Hallo juliett_tango, das ist lieb gemeint, aber bitte bau dabei keine harten Knicke in die Straßen, die real nicht da sind, nur um den OSM-Way nach einer Aufteilung so schnell wie möglich wieder in die Straßenmitte zu bekommen. Die realen Verläufe sollten in den Daten schon einigermaßen erhalten bleiben, damit z.B. bei einem ortsfremden Nutzer die Darstellung im Navi nicht komplett anders aussieht als die reale Kreuzung.  Ich hab die Kreuzung Fischbacher/Lorsbacher Str. in Eppstein mal wieder geglättet, da hast du vor allem für alle Rechtsabbiegungen Knicke reingebaut, die einfach nicht da sind und einen Nutzer deshalb verwirren.

Lesetipp: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/kreuzschnabel/diary/43843
juliett_tango (2024-03-26 22:30:05+00:00): Hallo FraukeLeo, danke für den Hinweis und den Lesetipp! Um deine Anregung nachzuvollziehen, habe ich mir mal die Veränderungen, die ich damals an der Kreuzung vorgenommen hatte, angeschaut und auch, was du nun geändert hast. Grundsätzlich hast du Recht, würde ich sagen, und der Fahrspur-Verlauf ist jetzt etwas glatter. Einen harten Knick kann ich da in meinem Changeset aber nicht erkennen. Der Knoten mit der stärksten Änderung durch unsere beiden Anpassungen hat sich um vielleicht 2m verschoben, sodass man nicht davon ausgehen muss, dass sich Ortsfremde über die Kartendarstellung im Navi gewundert hätten. :)

Bei der nächsten Kreuzung werde ich genauer hinschauen.
FraukeLeo (2024-03-26 23:12:43+00:00): Hier sind die Daten von vor 24 Stunden: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Jar

Wer von Westen kommt und nach rechts abbiegt, fährt dort erst einen Rechtsbogen (der stimmt), aber dann plötzlich einen Knick nach links und anschließend einen Knick nach rechts. Und wer dann in den Rödelbergweg abbiegen will, hat erst den Linksknick und dann einen übersteilen Rechtsknick von so 130 Grad :) Ja, das ist alles nicht "schlimm", ich mein das auch nicht als Vorwurf, aber ist es nicht besser, glatte Verläufe in der Realität auch in den Daten so zu lassen? Zumindest wenn sie schon so sind?
Jarek 🚲 (2023-12-27 16:44:25+00:00): Sorry I accidentally submitted with no comment or source... still getting used to new JOSM interface.

Source is my survey today, as well as Bing and Esri aerial imagery.
literan (2023-12-28 17:08:54+00:00): зачем вы исправляете теги на шлагбаумах на access=private? через них запрещено проходить пешком? тогда надо убрать тег foot=yes
SunnyIsland10 (2024-01-11 18:31:42+00:00): Greetings MACEDONICUS:

Thank you for your mapping efforts in North Macedonia!
I've noticed several new “L-format” ref tag additions near Prilep (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102978170, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/857617082, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/822251766). Do you have any resources or documentation that you’re using for these updates that you would be willing to share?

Thank you,  
SunnyIsland10

Автоматски превод:

Поздрав MACEDONICUS:

Ви благодариме за вашите напори за мапирање во Северна Македонија!
Забележав неколку нови додатоци „L-формат“ со реф таг во близина на Прилеп (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102978170, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/857617082, https://www .openstreetmap.org/way/822251766). Дали имате ресурси или документација што ги користите за овие ажурирања што би биле спремни да ги споделите?

Ви благодарам,
SunnyIsland10
DaveF (2024-04-28 09:47:23+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1234647369
There can't be a tunnel & a ridge. Unsure from imagery which it is.
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-15 22:29:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152740214, 152740288, 152740274, 152740234, 152740192, 152740169, 152740167, 152740249, 152740178 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions by Hamilton 44/Delta Evas ALL, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16207
VLD549 (2024-03-25 09:48:00+00:00): Hi, could you indicate what the name change from De Loper to De Loper, Schoen en sleutelmaker is based on? From the Facebook, it looks like it should be Schoenmakerij de Loper.
Thank you!
eggie (2023-12-28 15:28:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Tip  Je pad loopt door het water..Zijn daar geen bruggen?
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-12-28 15:35:24+00:00): Je pad heb ik verbonden met het Waalplantsoen en de brugdelen toegevoegd.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145586354
MVG
eggie
RichardvanVliet (2023-12-28 16:26:14+00:00): Hey, bedankt voor je bericht!
Je hebt gelijk. Ik zal voortaan nauwkeurig de wijzigingen maken.
eggie (2023-12-28 16:28:34+00:00): Richard, laat je niet weerhouden door kritiek.. Veel plezier met mappen.
eggie
VLD549 (2024-06-25 10:27:23+00:00): Hi, could you provide a link that shows the name change from Duivenhoeksestraat to Duivenhoek?
I can't seem to find any sources.

Thank you!
JTS51 (2024-06-28 18:52:08+00:00): Hi VLD549
Thank you for your response.
Indeed the name Duivehoek is incorrect. I have now changed the name.
Thanks again, a response like yours keeps me on my toes.
Have more map fun.
Greetings JTS51.
VLD549 (2024-07-17 11:08:59+00:00): Great, happy mapping!
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-15 22:29:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152740214, 152740288, 152740274, 152740234, 152740192, 152740169, 152740167, 152740249, 152740178 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions by Hamilton 44/Delta Evas ALL, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16207
woodpeck_repair (2024-01-19 10:57:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146438530 where the changeset comment is: revert remaining edits of vandal Leipziger123
Nakaner (2024-08-28 09:23:17+00:00): Hallo,

der von dir hier verwendete Änderungssatzkommentar ist schlicht und einfach irreführend. Du behauptest, dass du die Reihenfolge der Ways in der Route sortierst. Stattdessen hast du den Streckenverlauf zwischen Kassel und Göttingen von der Neubaustrecke auf die Altbaustrecke verlegt. (Anmerkung für Leser, die das in Zukunft lesen: Von Dezember 2023 bis Mai 2024 war die Schnellfahrstrcke wegen der Rauhebergtunnel gesperrt)

Ich bitte dich hiermit, bei deinen Änderungen einen aussagekräftigen Änderungssatzkommentar zu verwenden, der deine Änderung beschreibt.

Viele Grüße

Michael
marczoutendijk_repair (2025-04-28 18:13:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165561074 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for fictitious edits
Tomas Straupis (2023-12-28 07:05:59+00:00): Laba diena. Bet tai čia neteisingai pakeista. Esami pėsčiųjų/dviračių takai pakeisti į išskirtinai dviračių takus. Kodėl? Dviračių-pėsčiųjų takas - highway=path+foot=designated+bicycle=designated+segregated=yes|no.
Irkatinas (2023-12-28 07:23:40+00:00): Takas buvo suskaldytas į 3 atkarpas. 2 iš jų yra pėsčiųjų/dviračių takai (kaip ir buvo iki šiol). Tačiau vidurio atkarpoje pėsčiųjų takas eina atskirai nuo dviračių. Žemėlapyje rodoma Neries.g iš tiesų yra pėsčiųjų takas einantis šalia dviračių tako. Tad pakeitimai yra teisingai, tačiau reik dar pataisyt ir Neries g.
Tomas Straupis (2023-12-28 12:28:31+00:00): Bet ten gi per metrą tie keliai, kam juos atskirais vektoriais atskirti. Gaunasi makaronai kurie neduoda absoliučiai jokios naudos, tik sudėtingumą.
Irkatinas (2023-12-28 12:45:18+00:00): - Vietom gal ir metras, vietom gal ir du.
- atskiras Neries g. vektorius jau egzistavo, tereikėjo pakeist paskirtį iš klaidingo"road" į faktinį "foot path". - Be to takų danga skiriasi. Toje atkarpoje dviračių takas padengtas asfaltu, o pėsčiūjų gruntas "compacted"
Irkatinas (2023-12-28 13:01:13+00:00): Manai reiktu Neries g. vektorių toje atkarpoje šalinti?
Tomas Straupis (2023-12-28 13:37:29+00:00): Na kai dabar ten footway greta cycleway tai kaip ir nėra prasmės, bet nu realiai tai ten mašinos pravažiuoja, ten turėtų likti track. Ar ten kažkaip užblokavo ir nebegali mašinos atvažiuoti? Tuo labiau, kad dabar ten liko tracktype žyma.