piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ika-chan! (2026-04-15 07:39:01+00:00): Hello, we do not map lay-bys as service roads if there is no physical separation from the main road. What we do instead is map the lay-by area and tag them with amenity=parking and parking=layby, and if it is a bus bay for buses only, we also tag access=private and bus=yes. See https://osmcha.org/changesets/181353434 for how I mapped lay-bys with no physical separation from the main road.
alexespinosaco (2026-04-15 13:59:28+00:00): ¿Podría explicar los motivos por los que se eliminaron estas vías de servicio? Son claramente visibles tanto en la ortofoto utilizada como en las imágenes más recientes de ESRI. Asimismo, esa sección del estacionamiento está destinada al aparcamiento de motocicletas y fue mapeada con base en conocimiento local.

Could you please explain why these service roads were removed? They are clearly visible in both the orthophoto and the latest ESRI imagery. Additionally, that parking area is specifically designated for motorcycles and was mapped based on local knowledge.
NewryCanal (2026-04-16 16:53:23+00:00): Hello alexespinosaco. 
My sincerest apologies for not realizing these service ways were for motorcycle parking, they looked like crops to me. Thank you for your input and happy mapping!
alexespinosaco (2026-04-17 04:14:21+00:00): No problem, NewryCanal. Thank you for the explanation and for restoring the ways! Happy mapping.
MappingMore (2026-04-16 11:23:58+00:00):  Revert of 181352809
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-15 08:06:59+00:00): :-/
NieWnen (2026-04-15 17:10:06+00:00): Cześć, 
nie nadajemy nazw bocznym uliczkom od głównej drogi, o ile nie zostały tak uchwalone i wyznaczone.
Hurtownia balonów producent i hurtownia artykułów party - PartyPal (2026-04-15 17:25:30+00:00): Ta droga jest tam ustalona i nazwana od prawie 30 lat, mieszkam od dziecka w tym miejscu
NieWnen (2026-04-15 17:39:36+00:00): Na warstwie ulic nazwa nie istnieje, stąd brzmi to na typową uliczkę bez nazwy, która nie jest niczym niezwykłym.

Jeśli natomiast istnieje uchwała, która ją wyznacza i jest to zwyczajna pomyłka urzędowa, to podeślij proszę.

To że adresy są nadane od głównej drogi, to dość standardowa praktyka przy braku wyznaczonej innej nazwy.
Fraxi (2026-04-15 08:34:25+00:00): В Княжево видях поне 2 такива контейнера с име/марка "Княжевец". Но май са твърде малко за да се създаде и за тях шаблон
Fraxi (2026-04-15 08:59:54+00:00): Ето едно такова "сърце" 
https://facebook.com/share/1GMQgBfUaQ/
Dimitar155 (2026-04-15 18:38:07+00:00): Не са техни май. Вдясно от текста "Княжевецъ" се вижда лого със сърце, но не разпознавам чие е.
Fraxi (2026-04-15 18:55:39+00:00): Точно де. То със сигурност е на тази инициатива/сдружение. Както и https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13653299950. В смисъл, виждал съм надпис "Княжевецъ". 
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=122224884830341197&set=pb.61560235919114.-2207520000&type=3

Но явно не са много като цяло. Остави...
Dimitar155 (2026-04-15 19:00:17+00:00): На табелата най-долу вдясно се вижда логото на капачки за бъдеще
Fraxi (2026-04-15 19:03:13+00:00): Едвам го видях :D Еми add-вай бранда(ако можем да ползваме от фейсбук снимки).
Dimitar155 (2026-04-15 19:13:54+00:00): Ц, ще трябва да се разходиш :)
Fraxi (2026-04-24 11:10:55+00:00): Така... за това "сърце" в градинката до колелото на 5-цата, отдясно на обложката има няколко лого-та: най-горното на Княжевецъ(по памет, сега не съм точно там), на район "Витоша", указание, че сърцето е дарение от...(име и фамилия) и най-отдолу е наистина мъничкото лого на "Капачки за бъдеще"
Fraxi (2026-04-24 11:38:50+00:00): Също и на читалището. Имаше и баркод.
Dimitar155 (2026-04-24 14:02:51+00:00): мерси, отбелязах ги като част от капачки за бъдеще
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-15 08:06:43+00:00): :-/
Singapuu (2026-04-17 15:59:48+00:00): Accidentally dragged a path all across the map. Please undo.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-15 08:08:12+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Just a test?
NeisBot (2026-04-15 08:12:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/3161705240 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Hyperbaric oxygen therapy chamber"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Komora terapii tlenem hiperbarycznym"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-15 08:17:13+00:00): Hi akmal16, welcome to OSM.

IMHO your changeset should be reviewed. Some of your added names sound quite generic and lack specific context to be a clear reference to a particular map feature.

Thanks
akmal16 (2026-04-15 09:08:40+00:00): .
akmal16 (2026-04-15 09:23:43+00:00): '.l'
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-15 12:01:40+00:00): ?
FajrAl (2026-04-15 14:02:09+00:00): Halo Akmal, selamat datang di OpenStreetMap. Sebelumnya apakah sudah ikuti tutorial interaktifnya yang ada di editor? Tekan tombol H nanti ada ikonnya. Atur juga bahasa antarmuka jadi bahasa Indonesia jika tidak mengerti bahasa Inggris.
adiatmad (2026-04-16 04:33:09+00:00): Halo Akmal, kalau mau bisa juga join grup publik buat diskusi seputar OSM di sini (https://t.me/osmindonesia)
eggie (2026-04-15 08:26:44+00:00): Bobbert,

Lijkt me oke als dat trottoir gereed is.

MVG
eggie
MappingMore (2026-04-16 09:08:04+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181402796
Bartekkmee (2026-04-16 08:52:30+00:00): Czy park handlowy jest napewno otwarty? Na stronie dewelopera widnieje data otwarcia 30 kwietnia, żaden ze sklepów nie uznaje na swoich stronach internetowych parku jako otwartego. Budowa owszem, zakończyła sie, lecz sklepy wydaje mi sie ze sa nieczynne.
NieWnen (2026-04-15 17:12:51+00:00): When adding a private tag, please split the way at the gate so that you don't add access=private to the segment near the public road.

Fixed.
Wildsharky (2026-04-17 12:00:13+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181408185
eggie (2026-04-15 09:12:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Marek-M (2026-04-15 12:40:17+00:00): You created a duplicate of enforcement relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12142771 and moved the speed camera to the wrong location. I'll fix your edit.
Kookykooky (2026-04-16 12:13:24+00:00): Hi, I apologize for the mistake, probably due to inattention. Thanks for the correction
Senihtu (2026-04-16 05:48:02+00:00): Hi!
Nach den "Bauarbeiten" an der Fontanestraße fehlt dem "Bus 6 (2-2): Richtsberg => Badestube => Südbahnhof => Erlenring => Hauptbahnhof" seine Starthaltestelle. 
Fährt der Bus immer noch ab Fontanestraße? wenn ja: wo gehts los? bei node 698279764?
Oder startet die Linie nun immer ab Hölderlinstraße?
happy mapping
NeisBot (2026-04-15 09:21:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1499549755 v1 | 12 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181356811
Adikso (2026-04-15 19:58:25+00:00): Edycja została wycofana. Punkt musi dodać dodany jako "Punkt" a nie jako nazwa rogu trawnika przed blokiem.
qkaz (2026-04-16 04:23:27+00:00): Hi danke für das ändern der Öffnungszeiten. Ich glaube da hat sich ein Schreibfehler beim Sonntag eingeschlichen oder? VG qkaz
qkaz (2026-04-16 04:31:43+00:00): Hab's korrigiert
NeisBot (2026-04-15 10:06:27+00:00): 🌍 OSM에 오신 것을 환영합니다, 크라앙.
기여해 주셔서 감사합니다!

협력을 더 쉽게 하기 위해 다른 사람들이您的 편집을 이해할 수 있도록 변경 사항에 대한 짧은 설명을 추가하는 것이 좋습니다. 명확한 댓글은 커뮤니티가 귀하의 작업을 따라가고 더 나은 피드백을 제공하는 데 도움이 됩니다. 좋은 댓글 작성 방법에 대한 팁은 여기[1]에서 찾을 수 있습니다.

✅ 여기에 지도 편집 내용을 기반으로 한 샘플 댓글이 있습니다: "평화로 89에 감자탕이라는 이름의 통뼈감자탕 목포하당점이라는 한국 음식점 추가"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, 크라앙.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added restaurant with Korean cuisine 감자탕, named 통뼈감자탕 목포하당점, on 평화로 89"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
flohoff (2026-04-15 11:35:27+00:00): Moin,
bis wann gilt denn diese Sperrung? Hat ja schon zu einer ziemlichen routingänderung geführt?

Rot alt - Grün neu

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=1189477,1245792#51.73317,8.81078,14z

Flo
hatul (2026-07-05 10:15:25+00:00): שלום יצחק

מה הכוונה ישן, השם הוא לא מקום לתוספות כאלה. אם הוא בשטח אז אפשר להשאיר אותו ואם לא אז למחוק.
תודה
Yitzchak M (2026-07-05 10:43:05+00:00): נטוש בידי וועד השבילים כבר כמה שנים. לא מתוחזק בכלל. וכבר לא במפה של וועד השבילים. לפי דעתי, אתה יכול למחוק אותו מהמפה לגמרי. וכן, לפני כמה שנים, אני כן טיילתי את כולו.
hatul (2026-07-05 10:45:10+00:00): תודה, האם לדעתך למחוק לגמרי או רק לסמן בתגית abandoned?
Yitzchak M (2026-07-05 10:57:08+00:00): למחוק לגמרי. עשיתי אותו ב 03.2022. וכבר הוא לא היה מתוחזק. חצי הסימנים איננו ומה שיש מאד דהוי. אתה מכיר אותי. אני אוהב לשמור שבילים במפה כמה שאפשר. אבל שביל הזה הוא מת לגמרי. "יתגדל ויתקדש שמה רבא..."
hatul (2026-07-05 12:42:04+00:00): תודה רבה לך, אני אמחק
Yitzchak M (2026-07-05 12:46:17+00:00): 👍
gurglypipe (2026-04-16 13:22:01+00:00): Hiya, it looks like this changeset just removes tags from this industrial building, rather than adding detail.

Why remove the tags? Have Anord Mardix moved out of this building?

Please take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments about how to write changeset comments which are a bit more helpful to others editing locally, thanks :)
REDDERS21 (2026-04-17 07:07:50+00:00): Hi gurglypipe
Thanks for the heads up.
Yes. 
The name tags have been removed because Anord Mardix have moved out of a significant part (majority) of this building.
gurglypipe (2026-04-17 09:49:35+00:00): Thanks for the clarification, and for the follow-up edits to split the building. Nice work :)
REDDERS21 (2026-04-17 20:17:44+00:00): 👍
GinaroZ (2026-04-17 14:47:21+00:00): There is a discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5150062 about the route, which basically isn't signed on this west route - will Sustrans be going out to sign it?
iandees (2026-04-15 13:12:22+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6937779908 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181366765, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Map47 (2026-04-15 14:21:32+00:00): Hello,
As you pointed out, the node was moved unintentionally.
Thank you for bringing this to our attention and for the correction.
Happy mapping.
thebrad1111 (2026-04-15 10:53:17+00:00): Also used bing aerial (forgot i had it unchecked in the sources in josm)
evgenykatyshev (2026-04-15 12:39:09+00:00): Спасибо за добавление названий улиц на русском языке. Но хотел бы заметить, что лучше не использовать сокращения в названиях. Например, вместо, "ул И. Чавчавадзе" надо использовать "улица Ильи Чавчавадзе"
OSMaper_xD (2026-04-15 20:59:12+00:00): Na ile ten fragment jest zamknięty, czy nie warto przenieść primary na DW931
iandees (2026-04-15 13:12:37+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8332787928 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181366784, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NieWnen (2026-04-15 17:19:18+00:00): Jak prędkość jest taka sama dla forward/backward i ma takie samo źródło, to source:maxspeed:forward/backward również powinny zostać scalone do pojedynczego
source:maxspeed=sign
Dominik1235 (2026-04-15 17:50:08+00:00): Aj my bad, dzięki za check
NieWnen (2026-04-16 19:31:26+00:00): Jeszcze zamiast implicit (w sumie skąd taka wartość?) w Polsce zdecydowanie popularniejsze jest PL:urban lub PL:rural

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:source:maxspeed

https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/europe:poland/keys/source%3Amaxspeed#values
NeisBot (2026-04-15 11:21:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12311576431 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Coffee shop software office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-15 16:33:08+00:00): 🕵 The mentioned node appears to be part of a highway=*

Businesses are usually mapped as standalone nodes (or within building polygons), rather than as part of a road geometry.
MappingMore (2026-04-16 11:16:49+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181408290
NeisBot (2026-04-15 11:24:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/10435219259 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Coffee shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-15 16:33:09+00:00): 🕵 The mentioned node appears to be part of a highway=*

Businesses are usually mapped as standalone nodes (or within building polygons), rather than as part of a road geometry.
ajmat (2026-04-16 11:48:57+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 181409612
woodpeck_repair (2026-04-15 11:24:08+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 181203442, 181204589, 181205094, 181205977, 181206233.
TGTAG (2026-04-16 14:35:32+00:00): Could you explain why you reverted the changes from changeset 181203442?
grandgoschier (2026-04-20 13:28:41+00:00): Announced to be opened at May, 1st, 2026.
eggie (2026-04-15 11:59:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Alle gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit de BAG (Kadaster) Beter niets aan veraderen.
Mocht iets niet kloppen dan kun je dat aan het Kadaster doorgeven.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-15 12:01:57+00:00): Hier kun je fouten doorgeven.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Blinkerdlaan+53&objectId=0014200040363334&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=242458.2494749449&geometry.y=588787.0631038498&zoomlevel=15.360000000000001

Wat is je bron dat de indeling anders is?
Jychom (2026-04-15 15:15:36+00:00): Hartelijk dank voor het welkomstbericht, en de uitleg omtrent de BAG!

Inmiddels heb ik contact gehad met het Kadaster. Zij gaven aan dat de gemeente verantwoordelijk is voor de bebouwingslijnen. Men gaf aan dat hiervoor een melding kan worden aangemaakt via verbeterdekaart.nl. Dat heb ik inmiddels gedaan: https://verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=242457.16&geometry.y=588779.94&zoomlevel=15.89

Wat mijn bron betreft: als bouwopdrachtgever en eigenaar van een van de adressen kan ik een bouwtekening overleggen van de situatie, naast het feit dat de bebouwing niet de kadastrale percelen volgt.
eggie (2026-04-15 15:48:59+00:00): Hoi.. Nou ik was gewoon nieuwsgierig. Je hoeft hier niet te bewijzen. 😀
Het is wel zo dat periodiek soms een herimport wordt gedaan en dan komt de oude vorm weer terug.
Gebouwen die niet kloppen geef ik direct door aan de BAG.
Wanneer straatnamen of wegen niet kloppen geef ik dat door via Verbeterdekaart.
Antwoord krijg je in ieder geval altijd.
Mvg,
eggie
Jychom (2026-04-16 07:49:53+00:00): Oei, sorry als ik wat bokkig over kom, ik blijf een rasechte Groninger ;) :D

Ik wacht gewoon de reactie van de gemeente af, en anders kan ik alsnog via de BAG viewer een melding doen.

Ik moet zeggen dat ik je hulp erg waardeer, fijn dat je de tijd wilt nemen om eea uit te leggen. Dank daarvoor!

Groet,
Jychom
eggie (2026-04-16 07:58:12+00:00): Kennelijk willen ze nog wat weten?
De woningen zijn in 2023 terrestisch ingemeten.
Is het mogelijk de melding te verduidelijken, waar het niet overeen komt?

Men denkt kennelijk 'Het is toch ingemeten.' Dan heeft iemand toch zitten slapen. 

'k denk dat je nog wel een mailtje krijgt van de Gemeente. 

Groet,
eggie
iandees (2026-04-15 13:12:47+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11953637295 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181366802, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
yelisey90 (2026-04-16 06:52:11+00:00): Restored addr:street tags: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181397368
As previously discussed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175670146 , please do not delete addr:street even if adding associatedStreet relation.
ffmp (2026-04-17 04:07:31+00:00): Deleted addr:street tags contained wrong info, so I have right to delete it.
Compare:
ვახტანგ ბოჭირიშვილის ქუჩა
ვახტანგ ბოჭორიშვილის ქუჩა

This is good example of why relation better, than addr:street on each building.
yelisey90 (2026-04-17 15:46:14+00:00): Hm, I didn't notice that indeed.
Still, the proper way would have been to fix that typo and not to delete the tags completely.
eggie (2026-04-15 19:57:36+00:00): Beste Ro  Je kunt daar toch gewoon als voetganger door. Ik heb een footway verbinding gemaakt. het zal anders niet correct routeren.

MVG
eggie
nevw (2026-04-17 01:38:31+00:00): Hi, I noticed you have a couple of self intersections in the building mapping.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=139.25194&lat=-35.12946&zoom=17
This usually means two points are drawn very close to each other instead of the one point.
iandees (2026-04-15 13:12:57+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12810846416 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181366809, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
北摂ライフサポート動物病院 (2026-04-17 12:21:26+00:00): Thank you very much！
silversurfer83 (2026-04-15 16:45:00+00:00): Moin Daniel :)

Du hast hier bei drei Feldwegen die Zugangsberechtigungen von access=private auf access=yes gesetzt (das yes bitte klein schreiben). Wie ist denn die Beschilderung der Wege? Denn mit dem yes gibst du sie für alle Verkehrsteilnehmer ohne Ausnahme frei und das ist bei Feld-/Waldwegen oft nicht der Fall. 

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181363185
Conway0506 (2026-04-16 06:32:04+00:00): Hallo Silversurfer,
danke für dein Feedback! Ich bin die Strecke letztens gefahren und eine Beschilderung war mir nicht ersichtlich. Habe die Freigabe auf das kleine yes geändert und Autos auf no gesetzt. Bei meiner nächsten Runde vor Ort werde ich die Beschilderung nochmal explizit prüfen! Gruß!
silversurfer83 (2026-04-17 04:56:58+00:00): Hi

Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung.

Wenn wir die rechtlichen Bedingungen nicht kennen sollten wir gar keine expliziten Werte setzen, da wir auf Wegen/Straßen aller Art eigentlich nur die rechtliche Situation (die ggf. vor Ort ersichtlich ist) abbilden.

Also durch Verkehrszeichen auf öffentlichen Wegen oder entsprechende Hinweise auf Privatgrund (im Wald gibt es oft Schilder, dass motorisierter Verkehr nur für Forstwirtschaft erlaubt ist).

Weiter viel Spaß und bei Fragen immer raus damit

Silversurfer83
aRGUM (2026-04-16 13:50:38+00:00): Hi,

Since, a) the church grounds are effectively a public space, and b) there are no signs on-the-ground indicating the opposite, access=private on the gates and on the service road is incorrect.

Just because there is a gate doesn't mean a territory is private. It may be open 99% of the time.

Please revert this and the other edit that had put access=private on the service road.
LakePoopó (2026-04-17 09:58:03+00:00): Hi aRGUM,
Thank you for reaching out, I will remove the access=private tags and instead add access=permissive to the gates.
Taya_S (2026-04-15 12:40:55+00:00): Shouldn't the address be in arabic instead of english?
Taya_S (2026-04-15 12:25:42+00:00): Hello, please address the issues left behind on your changesets and on the forum discussion before resuming uploading data.
Roboost_OSM (2026-04-19 08:43:43+00:00): Will do
HellMap (2026-06-19 11:23:16+00:00): Sveiki,

Lūdzu nesavieno ūdensteci ar braucamo ceļu - tie atrodas dažādos līmeņos un noteikti "nesatiekas". Tas rada navigācijas un ģeometrijas kļūdas.

Es šeit izlaboju.
Olgerts V (2026-06-19 14:35:33+00:00): Sveiki,
noteikums ir skaidrs, tomēr nevaru saprast, kur tieši tie bija savienoti. Atvainojos par kļūdām, es vēl mācos.
HellMap (2026-06-19 14:49:51+00:00): Viss kārtībā. Šajā gadījumā kanāla ūdensceļš https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1016739831 bija pievienots šiem diviem punktiem https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13732148583 un https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13732148584 starp tilta ceļiem, kurus tu sadalīji uz pusēm izmaiņā. Visticamāk, tu nedaudz pabīdīji tos viduspunktus un tie "pielipa" redaktorā pie kanāla. (Redaktors kļūdu šajā gadījumā nerāda, jo var būt arī pareizi gadījumi (piemēram dambis).)
Arretche (2026-04-15 12:30:49+00:00): Confirmé sur place, le banc est effectivement placé à coté et ne fait pas vraiment partie de l'arrêt
NeisBot (2026-04-15 12:56:18+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, sɛ̃malo.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Updated footways, steps, entrances, and waste baskets, removed fence and bollard attributes"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment