piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dvdhoven (2024-06-08 06:01:38+00:00): Ik heb deze changeset terug gedraaid.
Het is puur vandalisme. 
Grondregel in OSM: je verwijdert geen zaken, die goed gemapped zijn.
En de redenen voor het verwijderen zijn zeer dubieus.
Of iets iets toevoegt aan een kaart, daarvoor zullen altijd de meningen verschillen.
En of iets een zwarte vlek wordt, is ook geen reden voor verwijdering.
En dit tuinspoor is redelijk uniek in Nederland
dvdhoven (2024-06-08 06:06:48+00:00): Oh en nog een tip.
Als je zo hoognodig iets van de kaart wilt verwijderen, overleg dat dan eerst op het forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43
matheusgomesms (2024-06-15 18:38:02+00:00): Hi Stadia,

You are confusing stadiums. This is NOT Fonte Nova.
stadiaarcadia (2024-06-15 20:15:16+00:00): Hi, thank you for noticing.
eggie (2024-06-07 13:38:40+00:00): Sander..  Svp niet de wegen gaan vastplakken aan de landuse. De kaart wordt dan onwerkbaar.
MVG
eggie
sanderk35 (2024-06-07 13:45:13+00:00): Het spijt mij, ik wist niet dat die eraan ging zitten
eggie (2024-06-07 14:36:01+00:00): Plakken kun je voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken bij intekenen. 
Mvg
eggie
Filip009 (2024-06-09 15:07:36+00:00): Zdravím, aký je zdroj tých písmen? Nachádzajú sa na zastávke? Nebolo by vhodnejšie použiť local_ref? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:local_ref
TYAS123 (2024-06-10 00:43:50+00:00): Vďaka za tip. Použil som local_ref. Písmeno nástupišťa je uvedené na autobusovej zastávke. Na druhej strane zastávka električky nemá vôbec žiadnu značku, pretože sa nachádza uprostred vozovky.
aceman444 (2026-05-10 22:34:29+00:00): Myslim, ze pridavat local_ref na objektoch stop_position je dost zbytocne, ked uz to mame na objektoch public_transport=platform (dufam, ze kde to chybalo ste hodnotu pridali na oba). Ale hlavne to nepatri do nazvu, dakujem, ze ste to v dalsej sade zmien opravili:)

Elektricka aj autobus tu maju spolocnu zastavku, takze len jedno local_ref (pre kazdu stranu).
eggie (2024-06-07 14:22:16+00:00): Let op.. Je plakt de paden aan de landuse. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=152376865
Ik heb even wat losgemaakt.

MVG
eggie
BR_pebble (2024-07-29 10:16:40+00:00): Hello Kingsley AMANKWE
Thank you for mapping!
I have Created missing highway 8.46739, 8.6292538;
8.4664827, 8.6277424;Created missing buildings 8.4663536, 8.6274811;
8.4667469, 8.6284342;
8.4670904, 8.6286354;
8.466559, 8.6294939;
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
eggie (2024-06-07 13:45:57+00:00): Sander
Je hebt nog steeds building=school  En dat klopt niet.
Je blijft dan een gebouw zien. Verwijder dus die regel. Denk dat je moet kiezen voor alle tags zichtbaar. Dan zie je de regels.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-06-07 14:26:35+00:00): Het gebouw heb ik verwijderd. landuse education toegevoegd
maro21 (2024-06-08 11:05:42+00:00): A zmieniły się też tablice przed wjazdem na ten teren?
tastrax (2024-06-08 02:59:26+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
silversurfer83 (2024-06-07 19:33:55+00:00): Hi :)
meinst du, dass es passend ist die Fläche unter einer WKA als Kraftwerk zu taggen? Die WKA ist ja schon ein Generator.
Was ich mir vorstellen könnte, wäre alle WKA eines zusammenhängenden Gebietes in einer Relation als Kraftwerk zusammen zu fassen. 

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152377582
tastrax (2024-06-08 02:55:44+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
eggie (2024-06-07 14:02:32+00:00): Dag Willem.. Bedrijven taggen we bij op de adresnode. Dus niet op de gebouwomtrek. Ook niet nognaals een adres toevoegen.

MVg
eggie
eggie (2024-06-07 14:04:01+00:00): Info verplaatst naar adresnode
BCNorwich (2024-06-08 05:58:56+00:00): Does the grass really extend and join to the center of asphalted highways?
Lezurex (2024-06-07 20:40:35+00:00): Hallo aseigo,

Den building-Key unbedingt dranlassen, schliesslich ist es immer noch ein Gebäude und nicht nur ein Autohändler unter freiem Himmel. Habs angepasst.

LG Lezurex
akimapbuilder (2024-06-10 08:47:59+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since it overlaps with the existing road.
julcnx (2024-06-09 16:58:41+00:00): Thanks for your contributions elicolh! My advice it's always best not to delete data. Many paths in Thailand can become abandoned, or overgrown, but it may be only seasonal or temporary, it's difficult to know. Having access to the old path geometry can be useful for many reasons. Feel free to look below at the following tags that help describe an old or unusable path. Best, Julien 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:obstacle
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152377872
eggie (2024-06-07 14:14:45+00:00): Dag Koen.. Gaat dat fietspad niet gewoon binnenkort open? Begin juli?
Dan kan het beter met conditional getagd worden met een einddatum?
Voorbeelden van conditional 
access:conditional=no @ (2023 Sep 20-2024 Apr 3) 

MVG
eggie
KoenSt (2024-06-07 14:58:53+00:00): Hi Eggie,
Ik heb deze wiki gevolgd: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=construction .
Sinds maandag is het fietspad afgesloten voor werkzaamheden die to en emt 5 juli duren
eggie (2024-06-07 15:01:51+00:00): Hoi...
In dit geval kan het dan beter met conditional worden getagd. Wanneer iets vele maanden gaat duren en/of iets anders gaat terugkomen dan wel construction gebruiken.
Mvg..
eggie
eggie (2024-06-07 15:03:15+00:00): Already existing features may be closed for a short time for a temporary construction (e.g. old, damaged roads getting rebuilt). Don't use construction=* to tag such short-term closures (e.g. a road closed over a weekend to replace a sewer pipe); consider using conditional restrictions instead. As OSM data is often used offline (and therefore may be several months old), only tag construction sites if they are planned to be closed for at least six to nine months.
eggie (2024-06-07 15:57:00+00:00): Aangepast naar conditionaltags access:conditional=no @ (2024 Jun 3-2024 Jul 5) conform wiki.

MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse2 (2024-06-12 18:33:05+00:00): Hello,
Just spotted you've changed the name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10529390 to be the description again rather than the name.  I changed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142413576 following the broad consensus of https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposal-use-description-instead-of-name-for-route-relations/104656 .  I tend to agree with the forum discussion in that once "from" and "to" have been added to superroute members the "name" should just be the name, but it is true that many relations (in the UK and elsewhere) do have descriptions as names - do you think it's worth raising it in the UK bit of the forum specifically?
Best Regards,
Andy
Paul Berry (2024-06-14 10:20:45+00:00): Hi Andy,

I wasn't aware of the discussion beforehand. However, for long relations that are split into smaller sections, I renamed them because it's otherwise very difficult to tell at a glance which bits of the TPT are which. Naming all 14 parts of the TPT as just "Trans-Pennine Trail", while not incorrect, isn't helpful. Keeping that name only for the superroute makes sense to me. However, I will have a read of the discussion and adjust names accordingly.

Thanks for the pointer.

Regards,
Paul
Paul Berry (2024-06-14 10:35:15+00:00): The Pennine Way superroute and member relations have this section-as-name convention as well, though the sections don't follow the established stages of the route:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4080347

I'll give it some more thought, come up with some more examples and counterexamples, and start (or continue) a discussion on the UK forum/mailing list.
BR_pebble (2024-07-29 10:16:18+00:00): Hello Kingsley AMANKWE
Thank you for mapping!
I have Created missing highway 8.4664748, 8.6261719
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
phodgkin (2025-05-10 17:26:11+00:00): Is this actually a cycleway? I couldn't see any signage to indicate this.
These isolated sections of cycleway around the roundabout don't make much sense.
OldCreaky (2025-05-13 08:03:39+00:00): Hi Phodgkin, yes, this is a cycleway and can be found on Gateshead Council website google search 'Gateshead Council Cycling Maps' or click the link https://www.gateshead.gov.uk/article/15869/Cycling-maps
Probably my bad editing, maybe you can improve it?
phodgkin (2025-05-16 20:02:01+00:00): Thanks for the reference. But these dotted greens paths on the cycling map are labelled as "paths where you should walk your bike" (strange to include on a cycling map). I suspect it means "nobody will really mind if you cycle on these". Either way, I think they should be tagged as footways rather than cycleways.
vasony (2024-06-24 04:17:32+00:00): Szia!

Almafa köz, Golf utca táblázva vannak?

Tamás
zolikonta (2024-06-24 15:39:46+00:00): Szia, igen.
mgerken (2024-06-07 16:08:01+00:00): Moin,

der Parkplatz ist u.a. auf dem Leitsystem mit "Kasch" ausgeschildert, ich würde es also begrüßen, wenn der Name drin bleibt. Ich würde auch davon ausgehen, dass er von der Stadt betrieben wird und nicht vom Kasch selber.

Beste Grüße
highflyer74 (2024-06-07 16:33:15+00:00): Moin und danke für den Hinweis!

Ich drehe das gleich zurück. Ich war neulich im Kasch und hatte das wohl falsch in Erinnerung.

Viele Grüße!
BR_pebble (2024-07-29 10:15:17+00:00): Hello Kingsley AMANKWE
Thank you for mapping!
I have Created missing highway 8.4684008, 8.6169478
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
mgerken (2024-06-07 16:03:36+00:00): Moin,

ich meine mich zu erinnern, dass der Zufahrtsweg eher sehr feiner Schotter ist, gravel ist ja eher was wie auf diesem Bild: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:surface=gravel?uselang=de

(Ist aber auch schon wieder eine weile her das ich da war)
Raana02 (2024-06-07 16:06:23+00:00): Ja, das ist richtig.
akimapbuilder (2024-06-10 09:19:00+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since there is no building in sight.
BCNorwich (2024-06-07 19:03:46+00:00): Your silly fiction is removed.
martien-176 (2024-06-07 14:53:52+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. 

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location.

But be aware, the Google Maps Terms of Use forbid using Google Maps content - both map data and Google Street View - for making any other content, including for OSM mapping.

If the required imagery is cloudy or blurry please try alternative imagery.

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152379353
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-07 14:40:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8176706339
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1208793775

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-07 14:40:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11962911764

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Info wiky (2024-06-20 03:16:46+00:00): El Mirador, Santa Cruz Barillas, Huehuetenango
miluethi (2024-06-07 16:47:40+00:00): Hi LM,

Thank you for your contributions to OSM Nicaragua.
Can you please square out the buildings whenever possible and reduce shapes to match exactly the satellite imagery building?

Thank you and happy mapping!
BR_pebble (2024-07-29 10:15:49+00:00): Hello Kingsley AMANKWE
Thank you for mapping!
I have Created missing buildings 8.470541, 8.6076236;
8.4694932, 8.6082508;
8.4696681, 8.6084347;
8.46868, 8.6086283;
8.4693871, 8.6077257;
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
rskedgell (2024-06-08 06:17:35+00:00): Thanks for updating this.

As you asked for a review of this changeset, I would suggest using a lifecycle prefix rather than the disused key, in this case disused:amenity=bank. It can also be worth moving the name to old_name. I've updated the tags here and there's a link to the wiki page for lifecycle prefixes below.

Is the Barclays ATM (mapped as a separate node) still there?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
CG201 (2024-06-08 10:38:10+00:00): Thank you.  The ATM is not still there, so I have deleted it.
mikko_tamura (2024-06-15 15:44:15+00:00): this should be tagged as amenity=townhall; name=<name of barangay> Barangay Hall; townhall:type=village;
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152381097
Timmy_Tesseract (2024-06-16 08:57:52+00:00): There's also the more specific townhall:type=barangay ;)
Lezurex (2024-06-07 19:06:57+00:00): Hallo leyeol und herzlich willkommen auf OpenStreetMap!

Vielen Dank für deinen ersten Beitrag!

Kleiner Hinweis: Viele Leute tragen Gebäude auch basierend auf Luftbildern ein (aktuell aus den Jahren 21/22). Wenn du also ein Gebäude ganz löscht, kann es vorkommen, dass es mal wieder von jemandem eingetragen wird, weil es auf dem Luftbild noch sichtbar ist. Daher bei abgerissenen Gebäuden lieber einen Lifecycle-Prefix setzen. So ist der ursprüngliche Grundriss im Editor, aber nicht auf der Karte, noch sichtbar und wird nicht erneut eingetragen. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix

Aber keine Sorge, das muss man erst wissen :D

Happy Mapping, Lezurex
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 22:28:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152563518 where the changeset comment is: revert large-scale place reclassifications, please discuss on forum before making these kinds of edits
c0nsumer (2024-06-18 15:08:02+00:00): In this changeset you marked a lot of these trails as one-way. They are not one way so I've gone in and fixed a lot of it.

RAMBA has no one-way trails.
Trail_Caretaker (2024-06-18 15:42:29+00:00): I did get some of the data from from various locations including Trailforks.  I will gladly fix.  Is there a map or website that is completely correct that I can use to correct my mistakes?
Trail_Caretaker (2024-06-18 15:44:03+00:00): Sorry.  Thank you for fixing. Is there still some info that needs fixing?
c0nsumer (2024-06-18 15:46:34+00:00): OpenStreetMap is the gold reference. I named all the trails that have names based on direct communication with the RAMBA leadership and looking at trailside signage.

I also would advise you to not add more trails or change anything unless you've gone there in person and surveyed things. There are a bunch of old spots that appear in the Strava heatmap and on older maps which go through active subsidance areas where the ground is literally collapsing. Much of it has been fenced off since the heatmaps were updated or other maps last produced. 

Unless you go there in person and survey things -- as I have done and continue to do for all of the RAMBA trails -- you'll produce inaccurate and unsafe maps.
c0nsumer (2024-06-18 15:47:51+00:00): Also, I'm looking through, but because you've made such massive changes all at once it's like a puzzle of having to figure out what's now wrong or broken. Especially where you've added trails and changed routes.

It's really a bad idea to add to already-mapped areas based solely on old data you find online.
c0nsumer (2024-06-18 15:57:17+00:00): Here's another spot that you messed up. The trail is only Dirty Mary to the two track, then it's Luge Climb after that, and Luge Run going down. There is no Luge Connector, that's actually an old county road that is now unnamed: https://imgur.com/a/T03cZjx

By changing the path to have the sharp corners you have also deviated from how the trail is on the ground. There are no sharp switchbacks like that, but a series of tight curves.

In that image you can see the orange highlight is the OSM data from a few months ago and the background line is after your changes. You've really, really messed up the trail data in this area.
c0nsumer (2024-06-18 16:09:10+00:00): Another spot I've noticed, and I'm figuring out how to fix this, you added an old path in that goes through actively collapsing ground and traverses a fence that was installed last year. (This is just south of Jackson Mine Park in Ishpeming along the IOHT and the end of Cheese Grater.)
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 22:27:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152563518 where the changeset comment is: revert large-scale place reclassifications, please discuss on forum before making these kinds of edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 22:28:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152563518 where the changeset comment is: revert large-scale place reclassifications, please discuss on forum before making these kinds of edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 22:28:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152563518 where the changeset comment is: revert large-scale place reclassifications, please discuss on forum before making these kinds of edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 22:28:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152563518 where the changeset comment is: revert large-scale place reclassifications, please discuss on forum before making these kinds of edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 22:28:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152563518 where the changeset comment is: revert large-scale place reclassifications, please discuss on forum before making these kinds of edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 22:28:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152563518 where the changeset comment is: revert large-scale place reclassifications, please discuss on forum before making these kinds of edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 22:28:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152563518 where the changeset comment is: revert large-scale place reclassifications, please discuss on forum before making these kinds of edits
Татарстанец2 (2025-05-20 06:53:49+00:00): Что рисуешь ?
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 22:28:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152563518 where the changeset comment is: revert large-scale place reclassifications, please discuss on forum before making these kinds of edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 22:28:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152563518 where the changeset comment is: revert large-scale place reclassifications, please discuss on forum before making these kinds of edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 22:28:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152563518 where the changeset comment is: revert large-scale place reclassifications, please discuss on forum before making these kinds of edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 22:28:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152563518 where the changeset comment is: revert large-scale place reclassifications, please discuss on forum before making these kinds of edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 22:28:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152563518 where the changeset comment is: revert large-scale place reclassifications, please discuss on forum before making these kinds of edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 22:28:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152563518 where the changeset comment is: revert large-scale place reclassifications, please discuss on forum before making these kinds of edits
DressyPear4 (2024-07-26 11:58:37+00:00): Não é correto adicionar vias por cima das que já existem.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152382619
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 22:28:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152563518 where the changeset comment is: revert large-scale place reclassifications, please discuss on forum before making these kinds of edits
BR_pebble (2024-07-29 10:14:45+00:00): Hello Kingsley AMANKWE
Thank you for mapping!
I have Created missing highway 8.469458, 8.5976534;
8.4695243, 8.5973664;
8.4701491, 8.5968782;
8.4689314, 8.5972483; Created missing buildings 8.4692487, 8.5976739;
8.4694302, 8.5972061;
8.4695288, 8.5968508;
8.4696106, 8.5960568;
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 22:28:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152563518 where the changeset comment is: revert large-scale place reclassifications, please discuss on forum before making these kinds of edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 22:28:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152563518 where the changeset comment is: revert large-scale place reclassifications, please discuss on forum before making these kinds of edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 22:27:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152563518 where the changeset comment is: revert large-scale place reclassifications, please discuss on forum before making these kinds of edits
rskedgell (2024-07-24 17:44:45+00:00): Mini-roundabouts (traversable centre, road marking per TSRGD diagram 1003.4) are tagged as nodes rather than as circular ways as routing software needs to be able to differentiate between them. I realise that it is tempting to re-map them so that they look better on the map, but it is incorrect and unhelpful to data consumers. Reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 22:27:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152563518 where the changeset comment is: revert large-scale place reclassifications, please discuss on forum before making these kinds of edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 22:28:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152563518 where the changeset comment is: revert large-scale place reclassifications, please discuss on forum before making these kinds of edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 22:28:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152563518 where the changeset comment is: revert large-scale place reclassifications, please discuss on forum before making these kinds of edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 22:28:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152563518 where the changeset comment is: revert large-scale place reclassifications, please discuss on forum before making these kinds of edits
OSMCowboy (2024-06-07 19:11:02+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2024-06-02
fititnt (2024-06-07 18:02:38+00:00): Oi Gabriela. Seja bem vinda ao OpenStreetMap.

Eu vou mover o supermercado de volta para onde ele estava