piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GretaMN (2024-09-12 09:33:23+00:00): Liebe:r violavoelker,
bitte überarbeite die Eigenshaften des Straßenschildes DE:239 an der Linie. Welche Eigenschaften für das Schild an die Linie getaggt werden müssen kannst du im Verkehrszeichen Tool (https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/) nachschauen. Ein bicycle=no zu taggen ist dann überflüssig, das ergibt sich aus dem richtig getaggten Fußweg.
Danke! :)
Viele Grüße, Greta 
#lgmaps
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-18 09:09:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30213110

is "Flyover" really name rather than description?

see osm.wiki/Names
george1201 (2024-09-10 20:46:09+00:00): Hallo Nakaner,
kurze Frage, damit ich es verstehe. 
Es gibt hier 7+3 Stands. Du gehst von 2 Fahrrädern pro Bügel aus. Die beiden Randplätzen der 7er-Gruppe betrachtest du als nicht benutzbar. Am vorderen Platz würde das Rad auf der Zufahrtsstraße stehen. Der hintere Platz ist sehr nahe an der Wand, als dass man dort bequem ein Fahrrad anschließen könnte. Somit kommst du auf 12+6 Stellplätze. Richtig?
Übrigens: Das zweite Wall-Loop-Gestell hat genausoviel Stellplätze wie das erste: nämlich 5. Ich hab's mal eingetragen.
Gruß, Helmut (george1201)
smaftoul (2024-09-10 10:38:36+00:00): I would like to revert this changeset, but can't on osm-revert because I don't have yet 10 changesets
smaftoul (2024-09-10 13:07:25+00:00): Fine, I reverted the changes !
woodpeck (2024-09-11 11:46:19+00:00): Dear Q8Maps, your mapping of boundaries in Kuwait has a number of issues. Firstly, please don't add a "source=www.q8maps.com" tag to every object; it is sufficient to see the source on the changeset. Secondly, the individual boundary lines making up a relation should have no tags other than boundary=administrative; in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1314603644 for example you have used several name tags, a ref tag, a source - but no boundary=administrative. And in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1314822643 you have added a place=city tag to the administrative boundary which is also not correct. Also, "survey and satellite imagery" is not a credible source for your large scale editing of administrative boundaries since they are neither visible on satellite imagery nor will there be lines on the ground that can be surveyed. So please explain the actual data source of these boundaries.
gscholz (2024-09-16 10:10:50+00:00): Hi CQD35,
your recent edits have left behind several errors regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-2.35807&lat=48.51219&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=156432858

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
os-emmer (2024-09-23 17:04:22+00:00): Hallo ticki_52,
du hast hier ein emergency_service=ambulance hinzugefügt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9315213311
Das ist ein undokumentierter Tag, der vermutlich meistens das gleiche bedeutet wie der weitaus häufiger verwendete emergency=ambulance_station. Welche Information genau steckt in deinen Autgen in emergency_service=ambulance?
ticki_52 (2024-09-24 07:15:17+00:00): Tag entfernt.
Dimitar155 (2024-09-10 10:36:59+00:00): Bing Streetside е останал от предната промяна..
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-10 10:41:34+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Krótka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2839961417
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2839969581
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2839971576
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2839972635
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2839972694
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2839972698
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2839972932

"Stawowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12167858476
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12167858485
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12167858493
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12167858494
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241084539
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241084573
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095549661
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095549662
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095549715
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095549743
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095549817
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1121056029

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
skyper (2024-10-05 12:45:31+00:00): Hi Dane,
sorry, I missed this changeset and already have commented on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156595429.

After looking at this changeset, I fear instead of a simple polygon you need to use a multipolygon relation for the area with two simple polygons, one of each side of Vacation Way, as members with role "outer".
If this is too demanding for you, I can make the appropriate changes the next days.
Cheers skyper
Dan Westlake (2024-10-06 00:31:29+00:00): Skyper If you can make the proper change I would appreciate it. To give some concept this is a resort with multiple buildings. The "Clubhouse" as it is called is where people "Check in" and people stay in one the multiple separate buildings. We happened to stay in building 3 so I added the club house and those buildings. There are many more buildings in the resort that aren't shown in OSM. I can then review the changes to get an idea of how to do similar in future situations.
skyper (2024-10-09 12:39:26+00:00): Hi Dan,
it turn out that I am not familiar enough with this concept of resorts.
First I thought, that the whole area (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1080167478) might be the hotel but than I found the `tourisme=apartment` (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11954432943).
In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157586089, I added a multipolygon relation for the hotel (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18135070) which might be extended and tried to better tag the office (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12167851699) and the reception (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12231987093).
Again, I was not sure if each building has its own address (especially house number) and what the exact names of buildings are. E.g. is "MountainLoft" part of the name or only a description.
Additionally, I wounder if "MountainLoft" should be written as two words. At least in Tiger data the street is spelled in two words as "Mountain Loft Way". By chance, do you know what is written on the street signs?
If we both cannot figure out the proper tagging we might have to ask the community in the forum.
Greetings skyper
Dan Westlake (2024-10-09 17:56:29+00:00): Hi Skyper,

I'm not really familiar with them either. Bluegreen has a number of Time Share properties. You can have owners of units and units that are owned by Bluegreen which get rented out. I was hoping to find a map on their web site of how the buildings are laid out but didn't have any luck. The "Club House", where people register when checking in is apparently what "Owners" (my son owns some Time Shares) referred to it as being called.

As for the name, I got that from their Web Site which they have as a single word with a capital L for loft. https://www.bluegreenvacations.com/resorts/tennessee/mountainloft#gref
skyper (2024-10-15 18:46:59+00:00): Hi Dan,
meanwhile, I asked for help on the forum:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/120208
osmviborg (2024-09-10 11:22:50+00:00): Undlad venligst at flytte eller modificere adressepunktet. Adresser bliver automatisk opdateret. Hvis du mener punktet er fejlplaceret, så giv Stevns kommune besked.
rotagate (2024-09-10 11:51:33+00:00): Tjek, tak for oplysningen. Jeg skal nok lade den være. :)
osmviborg (2024-09-10 11:55:15+00:00): 👍
YomanNH (2024-09-13 12:31:23+00:00): Cześć,
zauważyłem, że pozmieniałeś prawidłowo zmapowane ciągi pieszo-rowerowe na highway=footway. Przywróciłem prawidłowe highway=path, zgodnie z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w
Franciszek Józef (2024-09-13 13:59:42+00:00): Ok, dzięki za czujność!
Ponderosopine (2024-09-10 16:38:55+00:00): is there a reason for these changes? I checked the ways that you replaced to the forest service data and you left the checkboard inholdings open
Brentar (2024-09-12 04:12:12+00:00): Hi Ponderosopine,

Thank you for reaching me out, I have fixed the JOSM validation error related to “Intersection between multipolygon ways & Self-Intersecting polygon ring". I cross verified my changes and observed that all the tags adjusted into multipolygon relations and haven't found any issue wrt to cartography. Please revert back if you have more questions.
Negreheb (2024-09-11 12:57:14+00:00): Servus, bitte geschlossene Geschäftslokale nicht einfach löschen, sondern einen Lifecycle-Prefix nutzen, wie `disused:*=*`, genaue Infos kannst du unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix nachlesen :) 

Wenn der Name vom vorherigen Geschäft aussen draufhängt, könnte man sogar den Namen noch dran lassen. Ich reverte das mal und mache die Note auf, damit ich mir das die Woche mal ansehe :)
Nearby0051 (2024-09-26 16:27:34+00:00): Hi
geht es hier um diese Shishabar?
https://cozy-hamburg.eatbu.com/?lang=de
infeeeee (2024-09-12 10:11:04+00:00): Szia! 

Facebook oldalakat ne a website címkébe vedd fel, van neki saját helye, a contact:facebook

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:facebook

További jó térképezést!
zolikonta (2024-09-12 16:43:25+00:00): Szia, köszi.
Mex (2024-09-10 12:59:53+00:00): Hi, thanks for you edits, can I suggest you use the square up feature in ID (short cut is q) to give nice square corners to your buildings.

Thanks,
Mex
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156434790
Bob Pioneer (2024-09-10 16:16:00+00:00): Thanks on Windows-Edge, its right click, third down - been using alot after you raised it, hadn’t found initially . Had to find YouTube in the end!

https://youtu.be/E1YJV6I_rhY?si=IoyYSc5wTKqQBlH1
Mex (2024-09-10 16:18:30+00:00): yeah selecting all the areas (but no nodes) and clicking q a few times usually (but not always) jiggles them into a nice squared up area, sometimes have to tweek a few nodes and repeat to get a good shape for things like rows of houses.
Bob Pioneer (2024-09-10 16:30:33+00:00): Oh - appears i need to read a bit more - a terrace block (of many?) - if i could select the whole cluster, and align all of them together, would be handy.

I’ll have another look - thanks.
Mex (2024-09-11 10:48:13+00:00): https://osmcha.org/changesets/156448326 see this change for the difference it can make.
Bob Pioneer (2024-09-11 16:47:26+00:00): Orange colour is "before" - Yellow is "after"?

The three terrace properties? Ok  - I'll need to look at how to grab "all three" to align, in one swoop...
forstner-m (2024-09-11 17:22:38+00:00): Hallo,
ich wollte dich nur informieren, dass du manchmal den Weg so verschoben hast, dass die Tunnels für den Bach nicht mehr passen. Ich habe das schon saniert. Hast du die Wege alle neu ausgemessen?
Danke!
Schöne Grüße
Michael
PPete2 (2024-09-11 20:39:31+00:00): hi, eine Kombination aus selbst bewandert, Laser-Geländemodell und Strava-Heatmap. danke fürs anpassen von brücken und Durchlässen. Ev. gehören auch die Gewässer selber noch anhand vom Geländemodell korrigiert
forstner-m (2024-09-12 17:11:54+00:00): Wunderbar! Danke für die Information!
eggie (2024-09-10 12:40:16+00:00): Svp niet schuiven met de kaart . Dit geeft vaak schade
Hier dus ook in Maastricht
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=156435648
eggie (2024-09-10 12:41:20+00:00): Parallelweg in Maastricht hersteld.
Probeer eens te reageren ipv door te mappen svp.
mvg
eggie
eggie (2024-09-10 12:42:24+00:00): Svap geen wegen aan de landuse gaan plakken. Het maakt de kaart onwerkbaar voor anderen
eggie (2024-09-10 12:44:26+00:00): Ook hier overlappende verkeerswegen Je tekent een weg op een weg.
eggie (2024-09-10 12:47:14+00:00): Routerelaties hetsteld.. Duplicated ways herstedl.

Je kunt niet zomaar wegen verplaatsen. Dan zul je rekening moeten houden met de  routerelaties.
eggie (2024-09-10 12:48:33+00:00): Alweerterheide Rode driehoek stuk
Bolle Jan route stuk
eggie (2024-09-10 12:52:30+00:00): Bolle Ja route hersteld
HansWesterback (2024-09-16 13:42:25+00:00): Du har döpt om Granbacksvägen till bara "Väg"??
eggie (2024-09-10 11:54:11+00:00): Hoi,

Ik kijk even of het correct is.
Is er een uitzondering voor tweewielers middels een onderbord?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-10 11:55:38+00:00): De fietsroute is hier stuk.. Ik kijk even of het door jouw actie komt.
eggie (2024-09-10 11:58:51+00:00): De route was al stuk. De fout zit op de rotonde. Die pas ik wel aan.
Nu even de hamvraag ...  is er een uitzondering voor tweewielers op de Hofstee en Bonairestraat?
gerardzeeman (2024-09-10 12:02:24+00:00): Ja, voor alle borden eenrichtingsverkeer geldt een uitzondering op tweewielers
eggie (2024-09-10 12:06:00+00:00): Uitzonderingen op oneway=yes voor tweewielers toegevoegd conform aansluitende straat.
Knooppuntfietsroute hersteld. Dat laatste was nu niet jouw fout, want je hebt niet geknipt in de wegen zo te zien. 
Groet eggie
eggie (2024-09-10 12:16:30+00:00): Dag Noud  Het is niet helemaal goed gegaan. Je hebt de weg terug weer over dezelfde weg ingetekend. dat noemen we duplicated ways en dat routeert straks niet.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-10 13:08:11+00:00): Duplicated way verwijderd
BikePC (2024-09-16 19:22:47+00:00): Fietspad verbinding tussen Trompweg nabij Hoflandbrug en fietspad langs het kanaal is niet oneway. Bron: survey 2024-09-16. Ben zo vrij geweest dit te corrigeren.
BikePC (2024-09-16 19:28:14+00:00): Nog een vraag: aan beide zijden van de Hoflandbrug is de highway nu getagged als busway. Klopt dit wel? Het komt mij voor dat aan de westkant (Trompweg - unclassified) als aan de oostkant (Vijf Meilaan - residential) overig gemotoriseerd verkeer over de Hoflandbrug moet kunnen doorrijden.
jb54osm (2024-09-17 10:19:15+00:00): Hi,

Um, ja, die 1-richting was duidelijk niet de bedoeling. Zal 'doorgeschoten' zijn van de oversteek van de Trompweg.

Op de obliekjes van S&P van voorjaar 2024 staat duidelijk (Lijn)Bus op de weg. Met inzoomen zijn zelfs de verkeersborden wel te herkennen. Zowel Voorschoten als Leiden zien openstelling voor autoverkeer niet zitten.
richlv (2024-09-14 06:26:25+00:00): Kaut kad jāiezīmē, kaut kad jāiezīmē...
Ā, nokavēju :D
HellMap (2024-09-14 08:38:40+00:00): Es jau arī gribēju ierobežojumus salikt, bet ... https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156369107 ...
GretaMN (2024-09-12 09:42:06+00:00): Liebe:r violavoelker,
auch hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75322505) kannst du den tracktype=* Wert bitte löschen. Bitte ergänze auf Straßen mit höherer Verkehrsbedeutung (ab highway=tertiary) immer die Info, ob es einen vorhandenen Radweg gibt. Falls nicht ergänze bitte ein cycleway:both=no (siehe Tagging Beispiele). Glaubst du, dass ein class:bicycle Extremwert von -3 hier angebrach ist? Ich frage mich ob eine -2 vielleicht besser passt, da die Auto hier innerorts nur max 50 km/h fahren dürfen und es außerorts Situationen auf Landstraßen ohne Radweg gibt, die vermutlich noch unangenehmer zum Radfahren sind. Die class:bicycle von +/-3 sollten nur sparsam in Extremsituationen verwendet werden. Die finale cb Bewertung kannst du jedoch besser vornehmen, da du ja vor Ort warst. Das nur als kleiner Gedankenanstoß, um eine Bewertung nach dem vorgegebenen Schema sicherzustellen. :)
Viele Grüße, Greta
#lgmaps
eggie (2024-09-10 12:22:08+00:00): Dag Noud...  Is dat hier veranderd? 
Is er geen apart fietspad meer aan de noordzijde. Ik vraag me af of het wel goed routeert. Er ontbreekt een stukje oneway op de oversteek. De hoogdrijbaan kun je niet splitsen met editor iD  Dan gaan de busroutes stuk. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-10 12:29:42+00:00): Vorige week waren ze er nog mee bezig.
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.22194,5.683319,19/?datastrip=20240831_PNEO-04

Ik pas even wat aan zodat het juist routeert. Met een recentere luchtfoto kun je het fietspad  wellicht beter neerleggen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-10 12:38:43+00:00): Beste Noud  Niet op de gebouwen bijtaggen maar op de adresnodes svp.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=156437334

En hoe heten deze eetgelegenheden?

Ga eerste verbeteren voordat je verder mapt.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-10 12:37:06+00:00): Kijk even hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dsports_hall
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-09-11 14:32:16+00:00): Hi, 
question about this Tomb, it says that Turkiey has authority over it, but it is under Syria territory. I don't think this should represent Turkiey borders. Also if you still insist on this change, please include it as inner member in all Syrian administrative divisions like you did for the new location of the Tomb
gscholz (2024-09-16 10:13:16+00:00): 

Hi CQD35,
your recent edits have left behind several errors regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-2.35807&lat=48.51219&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=156437693

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2024-09-27 08:39:49+00:00): Hi CQD35, 
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2024-09-16 10:13:43+00:00): Hi CQD35,
your recent edits have left behind several errors regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-2.35807&lat=48.51219&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=156437862

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
FazenBrifer (2024-12-03 20:05:25+00:00): Zdravo, te poti ni na tem območju, zakaj je vrisana?
mk2k22 (2024-12-03 20:25:52+00:00): Zdravo, tale kolovoz je prvotno vrisal uporabnik T0M0360, jaz pa sem potem naknadno urejal/poravnaval pot, ki se stika s tem kolovozom in obenem poskusil še dele kolovoza poravnati glede na Lidar podlago reliefa.

Vsekakor pa mi je bil že od začetka sumljiv predvsem tale del (https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=46.402163&mlon=14.272023#map=17/46.402163/14.272023), ki poteka od tega razpotja proti levi (zahodu), tako da če poti ni, je seveda smiselno, da se jo izbriše.

Tukaj, kjer je speljan pa tale drugi del kolovoza, pa se po Lidar podlagi vidi neko špuro/zarezo v reliefu, ki bi lahko bila slabši kolovoz pot, zato se mi ta del ni zdel tako sporen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=46.403421&mlon=14.275178#map=17/46.403421/14.275178 

Žal pa še nisem imel časa raziskati, tako da če ste prepričani, da tam ni ničesar, vam prepuščam, da izbrišete vse dele poti, kjer ste prepričani, da je na terenu ni.

Lp
gscholz (2024-09-16 10:12:24+00:00): 

Hi CQD35,
your recent edits have left behind several errors regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-2.35807&lat=48.51219&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=156438218

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2024-09-27 08:38:48+00:00): Hi CQD35,
your recent edits have left behind several errors regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-2.35807&lat=48.51219&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=156438358

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
vonrockos (2024-09-13 17:26:45+00:00): По результатам обсуждения в чате https://t.me/ruosm и на форуме https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/name/118684/2 прошу вернуть name = Веломаршрут №1 (2,3,4) для этих веломаршрутов.
Константин Гам (2024-09-13 21:34:38+00:00): Оо
Jrachi (2024-09-11 06:48:52+00:00): Ciao.
Stai aggiungendo coppie di relazioni identiche e senza tag.
Non capisco se si tratta di una svista o se si tratta di un lavoro di preparazione.

Ivo
MapSpot (2024-09-10 19:28:11+00:00): Hello,

In accordance with OpenStreetMap common practice, please avoid using the "description" field for advertising purposes. This field is meant to include objective information about objects in the OSM database.

For more information on how the description tag is to be used, see below.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description?uselang=en
angys (2024-09-10 12:58:35+00:00): *own visit GPX
literan (2024-09-10 17:18:03+00:00): прошу, не надо POI приклеивать к стенам. Они находятся не на стене
comfyquiettree (2024-09-10 13:18:03+00:00): *and
Wise_Turtle (2024-09-10 13:35:32+00:00): Ревертнул свою ошибочную правку.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156441058
Danysan95 (2025-05-19 17:42:55+00:00): Grazie per aver aggiunto la tua attività a OSM, ti segnalo che nel farlo avevi modificato per errore il nome di un tratto di strada e creato un duplicato dell'attività, ho corretto entrambi i problemi in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166489371
eggie (2024-09-10 14:42:58+00:00): Dag Robin..  Een weg voor bv landbouwvoertuigen wordt getagd met highway=track   Een highway=footway heeft een G7 bord  Het is een officieel wandelpad. Staat er een G7 bord.
Wanneer het smal is en geen bebording gebruik dan highway=path.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-10 14:51:56+00:00): track teruggezet met tracktype=grade5  Dit is geen footway
De voorgaande bewerker is een ervaren mapper. 

MVG
eggie
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 02:35:38+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164838879
Jordi MF (2024-09-10 16:10:04+00:00): Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).
El usuario realiza múltiples y pequeñas ediciones para dificultar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados. Los mayores errores son que modifica la toponimia oficial para que no aparezca en valenciano aunque así lo dictamine la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua en la cartografía oficial de la Comunitat Valenciana. Tenemos permiso explícito de esta entidad que, según las leyes autonómicas, es la entidad encargada de la toponimia oficial. Tampoco no tiene en cuenta la cartelería local que aparece en calles, carreteras y sendas.
Por otra parte, este usuario (y todas sus cuentas) está mapeando según las ortofotos y sin tener en cuenta el conocimiento local para delimitar si los elementos se tratan de edificios en ruinas, muros u otros elementos e, incluso, elimina PDIs con todo el historial de forma injustificada.
Ante todo lo expuesto y por las diversas anomalías, revierto todos los changesets porque, de revisar cada uno de ellos, únicamente nos dedicaríamos a ello, como si fuésemos administradores. En caso de revisar todas las ediciones de este usuario que ya ha sido bloqueado por 10 años con otras cuentas, nunca podríamos seguir mejorando la base de datos debido a revisar durante horas cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156447888
augil (2024-09-21 16:37:50+00:00): Hey, you sure this is a city?
Nzau (2024-12-25 20:59:08+00:00): Bonjour Alix,
Pourquoi avoir enlevé le "name=Voie verte accès engins agricoles" ? 
Cela aurait pu être passée en 'description' et peut-être que le chemin est bien une voie verte et pas une piste cyclable ?

A +
Enzo
mtmail (2024-09-11 14:30:47+00:00): Please don't add joke tags like evil=yes to company buildings (way 1030461029)