piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Taya_S (2025-02-07 17:08:41+00:00): Reverted SEO spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162253759
kitto33 (2025-12-23 20:28:02+00:00): I recently drove on the tollway in both directions, and the speed limits remain posted at 60 mph like the main lanes. Some of the signs seemed pretty old, too. Where did you get this information? It seems unlikely that they would raise and then lower the speed limits so often.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-30 16:41:19+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173986000
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-07 20:15:35+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/162255501
mcliquid (2025-02-07 20:21:06+00:00): Als was definieren sich denn die Notfallpumpen, die in diesem "Gebäude" installiert sind, die eine Leistung von bis zu 4 L/s haben können? Jede einzelne davon erzeugt bis zu 6 kW im Normalbetrieb.
Deine ignorante und unkommunikative Art sind Säure für dieses Projekt.
mcliquid (2025-02-08 08:24:30+00:00): Die Nichterreichbarkeit ist in der Regel ein Diskussionsproblem, wie auch aus anderen Änderungssätzen ersichtlich ist. Da die DWG am Ende auch mit einer Sperre oder einem Revert reagieren würde, nehme ich die Änderungen ohne Reaktion des Benutzers zurück. In der Regel erreicht man so eine intakte Kommunikation.
Ich gehe davon aus, dass viele Nutzer keinen Zugriff auf ihre in OpenStreetMap hinterlegte E-Mail haben. Das ist schade, denn in einem Community-Projekt ist doch die Kommunikation untereinander das Wichtigste, oder?

Verstehe mich nicht falsch, ich schätze jeden einzelnen Beitrag von jedem hier gleichermaßen. Aber es ist nicht fair den anderen gegenüber, wenn man sie einfach ignoriert.

Ich würde mich sehr freuen, wenn du noch einmal deine E-Mail-Einstellungen prüfen könntest. Dann kommen in Zukunft keine Aktionen mehr wie diese. Und wenn du dazu noch ein paar Worte schreiben könntest, wäre das super. Vielen Dank für dein Verständnis und ich hoffe, wir können in Zukunft noch besser zusammenarbeiten!
Mannivu (2025-02-08 10:37:35+00:00): Ciao, per convenzione in Italia il numero civico non va indicato sul poligono dell'edificio, ma su un nodo a parte perché il civico identifica un ingresso e non un edificio. Ma grazie comunque per l'aggiunta!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162254771
eggie (2025-02-07 21:36:39+00:00): Dag Jorik. Je vraagt feedback Lijkt me oke zo.

MVG
eggie
Soshal Distan Singh (2025-02-11 07:26:14+00:00): 👋

👇
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/1105552964
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/825162074

Дублировать адрес на точке внутри контура здания необходимости нет, если на самом здании адрес проставлен.

>imagery_used=Bing Maps Aerial

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Editing_Standards

👉 Do not trace from outdated imagery
👉 Align aerial imagery before tracing

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Использование_аэрофотоснимков

Тут ещё полезного можно почитать: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/literan
Mannivu (2025-02-08 10:41:38+00:00): Altra cosa: sempre per convenzione, nel caso di lettere nel numero civico vanno scritte senza alcun separatore e in minuscolo (quindi in questo caso 20c)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162255682
eggie (2025-02-07 19:24:50+00:00): Dag MichJans..  Je vraagt feedback  Lijkt me oke.
Tip: 
De meest recente luchtfoto is de Quick Ortho van PDOK.
Die kun je apart installeren.
ier wat leesvoer
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/de-beste-imagery-layers-om-nl-osm-te-mappen-met-josm/85393
Mapse
eggie
MichJans (2025-02-07 20:11:04+00:00): Bedankt voor de tip!
pitfire (2025-03-28 10:26:45+00:00): Hi gwselke,

wenn Du Ortskenntnisse hast, schau bitte nochmal auf "Weg: 7950366"
Ein Sanierungsstau  oder einfach nur vergessen? Weg hat seit 12 Jahren
"construction=yes". Du hast ihm jetzt „paving_stones“ verpasst, dann ist er möglicherweise auch keine Baustelle mehr. 

Gruß pitfire
gwselke (2025-03-28 22:42:04+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, Pitfire! Ich geh noch mal hin und prüfe!

Grüße --

gws
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-07 20:16:56+00:00): #seo #spam ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-30 16:40:25+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173985953
Luzandro (2025-04-23 10:29:37+00:00): Hallo,

brand/network(:wikidata)=WienMobil Rad passt für die niederösterreichischen nextbike-Stationen nicht, wobei sollte das überhaupt eine Sammelrelation mit amenity=bicycle_rental sein?
Eifelkobold! (2025-06-15 16:07:56+00:00): Guten Abend, mir ist aufgefallen, dass ihr am Mittelbahnsteig aus ref=1;2 ref=1;2;3 gemacht habt. Was ist der Grund dafür?

viele Grüße

Eifelkobold
silversurfer83 (2025-02-07 20:18:19+00:00): Hi :)

You added "building=yes" to the restaurant area (maybe the software did that automatically because it thinks every restaurant area is a building. I don't know) so I fixed that for you.

If you cycle through the available images you can see, that you are allowed to use the local adress layer which could really help make a better map
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162256942
Donut Master 🍩 (2025-02-09 18:25:43+00:00): Thanks for fixing it for me! Yes, it has a buiding because I've been there. If I do other restaurants, I will see if it will have a building or not.
silversurfer83 (2025-02-09 19:13:20+00:00): You can add the building itself, yes.
If you cover everything that belongs to the restaurant, including the outdoor seating, please do NOT add "building=yes" to that area. Try to be precise if the aerials allow it
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-30 16:40:00+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173985938
Allison P (2025-02-07 23:54:38+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your edit! As requested, here's a review of your changeset.

The opening hour syntax is tricky to get right, but you have it down perfectly!

The phone number just needs a slight tweak. It should be in +<country code>-<area code>-<local number> format, in this case +1-208-373-0020.

I hadn't heard about the name change. Good to know!
Heiti tea (2025-02-12 18:53:38+00:00): Points pour référencement de dalle
Taya_S (2025-02-07 18:49:40+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162257299
voltairovicz (2025-02-10 10:36:39+00:00): Witaj, zmiany ktore wprowadziles sa niestety bledne i moga prowadzic, do znaczacych bledow w nawigacjach. Zmieniles mnostwo zwyczajnych drog lesnych na residential i unclassified, z reguly bez znacznika surface. Drogi lesne oznaczamy przede wszystkim trackami. Zwlaszcza zwyczajne szutrowki bez dodatkowego odwodnienia jak glowne, ubite tluczniem drogi przeciwpozarowe. Nawigacje traktuja unclassified jako drogi czwartorzedne i moze sie to skonczyc sytuacja, ze nawigacja pokieruje kogos przez las, bo wezmie te droga jako tak samo wazna jak jakas asfaltowa powiatowka czy droga gminna. Niestety wiekszosc z tych drog jest prawdopodobnie do poprawy.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-11 02:22:39+00:00): 1) czemu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1357848390 to nagle highway=unclassified ?

2) proszę, przeczytaj https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Makosv21 (2025-02-13 18:36:26+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/zglaszanie-i-prosby-o-sprawdzenie-kont-edycji-uzytkownikow/110854/123

Chciałem dobrze, wyszło źle, szerzej opisałem w poście pod linkiem powyżej
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-30 10:50:41+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173969503
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-30 16:38:13+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173985873
TrickyFoxy (2025-02-07 21:30:50+00:00): 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении
JeroenHoek (2025-02-09 20:36:45+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162328063.
HantDX (2025-02-10 21:37:16+00:00): Согласно Лемтюговой, название этой деревни — Дайнава на бел. и Дайнова на рус., без "Тракельская". Также ссылка на википедию вами указана неправильная.
JeroenHoek (2025-02-08 09:00:35+00:00): This is the second time I'm seeing you erase valid shop names because you are blindly applying some quick fix suggested for perceived QA-errors:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12244694147#map=19/52.845678/5.710296

Look at that shop's website:

https://www.gall.nl/winkels/details/lemmer-schoolstraat-12

They are indeed calling that shop 'Gall&Gall gemak', so why are you changing that name?

By the way, the last time you edited things in this area and deleted valid data you never bothered to respond:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160199513

Are you unaware of these comments, or are you just taking the piss?
JeroenHoek (2025-02-09 20:36:53+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162328063.
JeroenHoek (2025-02-08 09:10:54+00:00): Please tell us what you did in your changeset comments. Just 'tagging qa' doesn't tell your fellow mappers anything. If you're adding missing wikidata-tags to operator-tags, say so!
JeroenHoek (2025-02-09 20:36:49+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162328063.
JeroenHoek (2025-02-09 20:36:42+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162328063.
trigpoint (2025-02-07 19:37:21+00:00): Hola 
Phil del Grupo de Trabajo de Datos aquí.

Sus ediciones han sido marcadas como sospechosas y, al investigar, he descubierto que ha eliminado un gran número de edificios. 

Por favor, no lo hagas, es una falta de respeto a otros mapeadores cuyo trabajo y tiempo estás desperdiciando. Por favor, mejore el mapeo existente, no elimine los objetos que existen. 

Voy a revertir tus eliminaciones.

Hello
Phil from the Data Working Group here. 

Your edits have been flagged as suspicious and on investigation I have found that you have deleted a very large number of buildings. Please do no do this, it is disrespectful to other mappers whose work and time you are throwing away. Please improve exiting mapping, do not delete objects which exist.

I will revert your deletions.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-07 19:11:09+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12566153823
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12566153793
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1357852062
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260937661

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-08-04 22:26:12+00:00): poprawione
JeroenHoek (2025-02-09 20:36:56+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162328063.
NeisBot (2025-02-08 08:06:04+00:00): Hi TomJeffs, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 123 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Tatfahren (2025-02-08 08:44:49+00:00): Vielleicht solltest du dir zum korrekten eintragen einmal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Danimal_training ansehen.
Tatfahren (2025-02-08 10:32:02+00:00): Das war nicht so gemeint das du das löschen sollst, sondern das du die Hundeschule korrekt taggst, damit sie bei gezielter Auswertung auch gefunden wird.
WWMapper101 (2025-02-08 10:04:15+00:00): Please, do not revert address changes where they have already been fixed. I will fix the address yet again
MarinoBM (2025-02-09 15:58:07+00:00): Hola Elizir: ¿has comprobado en persona que estas etapas de la ruta EuroVelo ya están ejecutadas? Porque en la página de EuroVelo figura que están en proyecto.
https://www.eurovelospain.com/rutas/eurovelo-8/
Cuando las etapas son solo un proyecto pueden ir en la relación EuroVelo 8 - Ruta Mediterránea - Parte España con la etiqueta state=proposed. La otra opción es eliminarlas.
Rutas EuroVelo en España
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rutas-eurovelo-en-espana/108020

Un saludo.
mcliquid (2025-02-07 20:23:08+00:00): Hups, hier ist wohl was schief gelaufen, oder? :)

In diesem Fall bitte vor dem Ortswechsel immer alle Änderungen hochladen!

Um Konflikte zu vermeiden und aus Höflichkeit gegenüber anderen wird empfohlen:
• Änderungen in einem kleinen geografischen Bereich zu kombinieren (innerhalb einer Stadt, eines Bezirks oder einer Provinz)
• Änderungen innerhalb desselben Landes zu halten
• Änderungen hochzuladen/speichern, bevor man in einem anderen Gebiet weiterkartiert

Warum? Schau dir den Abschnitt "Geographische Größe von Changesets" auf dieser Wiki-Seite an:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Danke für die Berücksichtigung, einen schönen Tag noch und fröhliches Mappen!
qugeb (2025-02-07 21:01:23+00:00): An dieser Stelle auch nochmal eine Einladung nach https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bundesweites-fixen-von-adressen/125289
letihu (2025-02-07 22:11:08+00:00): Lese ich mit. Sehr interessant.
NeisBot (2025-02-08 08:06:03+00:00): Hi shu0410, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 109 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
eggie (2025-02-07 20:05:10+00:00): Dag Kattenluikje..

Met iD kun je geen routerelaties bewerken. De routes gaan dan stuk. 
Routerelaties kun je alleen bewerken met editor iD..
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-07 20:07:23+00:00): Typo  Routerelatie kun je alleen bewerken met editor JOSM!
Route N 50 is in iedere geval nu stuk.
eggie (2025-02-07 20:48:28+00:00): Ik denk dat ik de fout eruit heb gehaald. Vergeten stukje.

Je edits heb ik doorgestuurd naar de OV routeexpert.

MVG
eggie
Leo Slager (2025-02-07 23:37:42+00:00): Dank je,
de route is weer helemaal in orde.

MVG
Leo
Percherie (2025-02-09 00:29:16+00:00): Merci pour la correction

Le même utilisateur à fait des tentative étrange en lien avec des tag bitcoin. J'ai l'impression qu'il a casser un établissement de type bar ou restaurant

Par exemple sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162252349#map=19/43.186335/3.002531

A tu le temps de regarder ?
LySioS (2025-02-09 07:59:24+00:00): J'ai vu oui, j'avais voulu le revert aussi, mais la multiplication de modifs qu'il a fait dessus a bloqué le revert.

Je veux bien que tu corrigés le truc
habi (2025-02-12 08:07:07+00:00): I reverted the brige, because I'd like to mark it as destroyed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162418875
habi (2025-02-12 08:07:28+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4623489
aceman444 (2025-03-09 00:26:22+00:00): Zdravim, cesty ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1158663763 su viditelne na Ortofoto este niekolko rokov, takze je dobrou praxou ich len zmenit na removed:highway=*, aby ich niekto nezakreslil znova.

A cesty https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/737129835 a https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205887086 nie su spojene, namiesto toho sa tam zmenili jednosmerky.
aceman444 (2025-07-29 23:48:57+00:00): Zdravim, nie kazdy chodnik je aj sidewalk, napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1357863038 . Tu cast bude skor footway=crossing.
Jožo Schwarz (2025-07-30 12:33:53+00:00): Hej, toto bude nejaké ctrl+c ctrl+v, vďaka za upozornenie.
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 22:53:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162263647 where the changeset comment is: revert unsubstantiated edits on Drew campus, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162260694
b-jazz (2025-02-08 18:05:32+00:00): Hi Calvin,

Thanks for adding golf courses to OpenStreetMap. We appreciate your contributions. 

Here are some bits of advice to make your golf course mapping even better:
* Don't give names to tees, fairways, greens, etc. unless they are explicitly named. The proper way to number something like a fairway is a "ref=18" tag instead of a "name=Fairway 18".
* It would be helpful to me (and others) if, when the fairway completely surrounds the green if you could select the fairway and green and combine them into what's called a multipolygon. There is a "Merge" option with a "C" shortcut to combine them. Just hold down shift and select both objects.

There are some more bits of advice if you care to read over the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls
b-jazz (2025-02-08 18:19:13+00:00): Oh, another problem is deleting an object when you want to start from scratch. It's much better to modify the geometry of an object instead of just getting rid of it (and more importantly, it's history). If it is difficult to see, try the "W" keyboard shortcut to turn on "wireframe" mode and get rid of some of the shading from the existing feature that obscures background imagery.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-07 20:31:36+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2755177862
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260937304

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-08-04 22:17:19+00:00): naprawione
GilB (2025-05-10 16:43:32+00:00): Bonjour
J'ai fait un revert de ce déplacement de POI. Le commerce n'est pas visible à l'endroit indiqué. S'il est prévu, rien ne le signale. J'irai à l'emplacement d'origine pour vérifier s'il est toujours ouvert.
Nanonej (2025-05-11 16:01:10+00:00): Hello! Ça marche, de mémoire 'avais laissé aussi une note car les proprio m'avait dit qu'ils déménageait bientôt l'enseigne et quelques temps plus tard on m'avais répondu sur la note que c'était bon. Donc bon à vérifier sur place effectivment. Désolé pour ça.
GilB (2025-05-11 18:23:38+00:00): Ce n'est pas grave en soi. Il y a effectivement un local en travaux dans cette rue mais c'est loin d'être fini. Et après je préfère laisser un POI à sa place en changeant les tags, plutot que le déplacer. Cela permet de garder l'historique du lieu, plutôt que celui de l'enseigne.
Bon séjour au Japon :-)
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-02-08 00:53:44+00:00): Est-ce que ces rues existent ou c'est seulement en projet? Ajouter un source. Sur Esri World Imagery, on ne voit pas ces rues.
woodpeck (2025-02-07 21:04:32+00:00): Dear MenKauRa - "roads and objects editing" is not a good changeset comment. Also no need to prefix your comment with "az_07-02-25", as the date is automatically recorded.
MenKauRa (2025-02-07 21:33:18+00:00): Dear Woodpeck… I am writing the title of the comment this way, because in one edit I try to edit the roads of a given village, town or district as much as possible.. writing a more detailed extensive comment turns out to be very long and inconvenient… in any case, thank you for writing to me, and I will try to take your comments into account and adhere to them… with respect…
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 22:53:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162263647 where the changeset comment is: revert unsubstantiated edits on Drew campus, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162260694
IvanBabić (2025-02-09 20:39:51+00:00): I reverted this changeset because a relation was tagged unnecessarily #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162328170
NeisBot (2025-02-07 20:58:37+00:00): Hi Poseidon66, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 15 natural(s)
- 2 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=162260694
woodpeck (2025-02-07 22:52:14+00:00): Dear Poseidon66, you have deleted too many things in your recent changesets - things that still appear to be there according to aerial imagery. And instead of giving a good reason for your deletions in the "changeset comment" field, all you are telling us is meaningless stuff like "1.2", "1.3". That is not sufficient explanation for such far-reaching deletions, hence I am reverting them now. (DWG Ticket#2025020710000589)
JakovBušić (2025-02-16 20:56:10+00:00): I revert it because accidental node was created #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162586768
225059 (2025-02-15 16:27:39+00:00): Hallo FKaindl,
Danke für deine Mitarbeit :)
Bist du dir sicher, dass du hier den richtigen Laden bearbeitet hast? 
Der „Umut Döner“ im Gebäude „Place Le Pecq 1“ auf der Rückseite des Hennefer Bahnhofs ist unverändert geöffnet. Ich konnte gestern Mittag keine Anzeichen für eine Schließung entdecken, im Gegenteil - der Laden war gut besucht.
Viele Grüße
„225059“
ilias_ (2025-02-10 22:07:54+00:00): Please also add name:fr=Boulevard Annakhil and name:ar=شارع النخيل. Thank you!
wireguy (2025-03-30 11:05:00+00:00): HI "b".  Since you have local knowledge, can you look at way 1357865175.   I think at some point it was part of the two relations:
relation 4638774 Raheenanisky
relation 4638773 Powelstown
Both relations are unclosed rings.
wireguy (2025-03-30 11:10:34+00:00): way 1357871323
looks like it should be part of 
relation 4637228 Raheenahoran
relation 4637216 Greatheath
wireguy (2025-03-30 11:20:19+00:00): Also broken rings in relations:
relation 4682503 Ballyadams ED
relation 4639020 Parkahoughill
relation 4682525 Ballylynan ED
relation 4639004 Ballyadams

looks like they need:
way 1357861073
way 1357861072
way 1357861074
b-unicycling (2025-03-30 23:26:01+00:00): Thanks for bringing those to my attention. They should be fixed now.
puchaczowsky (2025-04-26 17:43:15+00:00): czemu highway=service?
𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ (2025-06-15 17:39:42+00:00): Przepraszam za brak odpowiedzi,

Ten odcinek nie jest jeszcze otwarty, więc poprawne jest tu service.
puchaczowsky (2025-06-15 17:48:02+00:00): service jest poprawne tylko wtedy gdy nie jest budowana kontynuacja, a w tym przypadku jest budowana