piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JeroenHoek (2024-09-19 10:54:57+00:00): Ook aangepast. :)

cdoggg: zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:foot%3Duse_sidepath
eggie (2024-09-19 10:59:13+00:00): Top!
cdoggg (2024-09-24 12:53:59+00:00): Goedendag! Sorry ik ben nieuw hier, ik ben hier beland omdat ik graag hardloop. Ik probeer alle straten van de gemeente te lopen en te voltooien. Het proces houd ik bij via citystrides. Daarin vallen me enkele plekken op die gewoon weg niet bedoeld zijn om te hardlopen. Bijvoorbeeld het deel bij Stiens, dat deel naar de rotonde is echt alleen bedoeld voor auto's die 80 mogen rijden. Kunnen jullie dat aanpassen?
JeroenHoek (2024-09-24 13:07:09+00:00): Dat tussenstukje heeft nu inderdaad geen foot=use_sidepath.

Weet je wat het lastige is? Je mag daar qua verkeersregels wel lopen. De wegbeheerder verbiedt het daar namelijk niet. :(

Sterker nog:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/519523058

Deze weg mag je als voetganger gewoon bewandelen als je je aan de plaats op de weg houdt (wat effectief de berm of uiterst rechts betekent).

Dit komt omdat we in Nederland meestal wel een verplicht fietspad naast zo'n weg hebben, of een weg die als autoweg of snelweg bebord is (daar zit het voetgangersverbod in namelijk). Wanneer die ontbreekt, zoals bij dit soort hoofdwegen net onder het niveau van autoweg, krijg je deze rare situatie.

Ik pas het wel even aan, want ik ben hier ook geen fan van (het is onveilig), maar dit is een dingetje waar de meningen ook bij de OpenStreetMap-gemeenschap over verschillen.

Als je dit meldt bij de gemeente (https://meldingen.leeuwarden.nl/), dan krijg je waarschijnlijk als antwoord dat ze een extra bord niet nodig achten, omdat niemand daar loopt…
JeroenHoek (2024-09-24 13:10:40+00:00): Dit bord C9 hangt er namelijk:

https://maps.app.goo.gl/3Ew3fDPn8oEBzE339

Volgens het RVV:

"Gesloten voor ruiters, vee, wagens, landbouw- en bosbouwtrekkers, motorrijtuigen met beperkte snelheid, mobiele machines, brommobielen, fietsen, snorfietsen, bromfietsen en gehandicaptenvoertuigen."

Daar ontbreekt een C16 bord. Maar ja, wegbeheerders willen minder borden, en voor die C16 heb je een extra bord nodig overal waar die C9 of C15 hangt.
VictorIE (2024-09-29 14:47:27+00:00): Hi,

Underground power lines are power=cable.

Is this the actual route or a "it is likely to be this route" situation? If the latter, we've been adding things like 

note = Estimate route 

or 

fixme = Exact routing unknown - possibly an underground cable.
Ivandor (2024-09-29 16:15:09+00:00): Hi,
I found the route on the Eirgrid website here:
https://cms.eirgrid.ie/sites/default/files/publications/All-Island-Transmission-System-Map-December-2023_0.pdf

Thanks for letting me know about the correct tagging, I'll update the tags.
kpv8 (2024-09-19 14:03:16+00:00): Jak coś w otwarcie jest błąd.
Frans S (2024-10-17 12:37:10+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping.

B: Overlapping buildings.

D: Connecting Nodes to other features.
E: Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156792571
Frans S (2024-10-17 12:35:57+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping.

B: Overlapping buildings.

D: Connecting Nodes to other features.
E: Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156793062
hlfan (2024-09-18 21:52:36+00:00): Ein Hydrant mitten am Acker? Das muss ich mir am Freitag persönlich anschauen...
user_5359 (2024-09-22 05:49:01+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12184851604 (one of sixty six objects). Did you mean name:en instead nem:en?
sfrank (2024-09-23 21:07:58+00:00): Hello,

Thank you. Correct, should be name:en.
was already fixed by user mueschel.
ma-rt-in (2024-10-04 11:12:37+00:00): Hallo,

leider hast Du hier einen falschen Wert für das DRK verwendet. Denn dort ist sicherlich kein Krankenhaus.
Was genau soll den dort sein?

vg
Mapinator_2000x (2024-10-13 21:31:38+00:00): Hi Martin,

Danke für den Hinweis. DRK Station ist zwar korrekt aber das Krankenhaus ist durch eine Vorlage reingerutscht.

Beste Grüße
ma-rt-in (2024-10-14 03:48:51+00:00): Was meinst Du den genau mit DRK Station?
Eine Rettungswache, die Räumlichkeiten des Ortsverein oder was anderes?
Frans S (2024-09-24 07:55:53+00:00): Hello, Thanks for mapping.
A remark. Please do not cluster buildings and tag it as 1 building
Each building need to be mapped individually. Check also the borders of a plot. Buildings are mostly build within 1 plot.
Best regards and keep mapping
marczoutendijk (2025-12-28 08:42:59+00:00): Hoi,
In de fixme staat: "exacte locatie".
Bedoel je daarmee dat dit de juiste locatie is of, bedoel je dat je twijfelt over die locatie?
A67-A67 (2025-12-29 10:41:17+00:00): Ik twijfel over de locatie. Op het perceel staan meerdere gebouwen met maar 1 adres. Dus in welk gebou zit de winkel?
marczoutendijk (2025-12-29 10:55:35+00:00): Ah, ik zie het. Ik zet het ook op mijn lijstje om langs te fietsen. Het is hier niet al te ver vandaan.
ivanbranco (2024-11-17 11:45:09+00:00): Ciao Martin,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1270653412/history

questa building:part non mi sembra corretta, comprende anche i buchi dell'edificio. Il wikidata inoltre é l'id della way OSM, non il Q-Item.
mueschel (2024-09-19 10:04:55+00:00): Something went wrong here, you imported almost 10000 objects with tags like "FEATURE = RESIDENCE". Please have a look and fix these tags.
Hypsometric (2025-07-28 20:38:28+00:00): Thanks for your edits. Please take a look at Names in the wiki. Specifically the "Name is the name only" section (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only). I noticed there are many parking lots that are descriptive names where ref=* is all that is needed.
salisburymistake (2024-09-20 18:50:05+00:00): C'mon, man. Obviously a road that has existed in OSM for 12 years isn't officially named after a meme from this year.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156882606
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-19 00:37:49+00:00): 156611341 156611312 156611159 156611127 156610811 156610781 156610760 156610745 156610716 156610701 156610671 156610637 156610590 156610562 156610531 156610495 156610453 156610431 156610398 156610368 156610331 156610296 156610268 156610228 156610193 
156610156 156610116 156610085 156610033 156609978 156609943 156609871 156609845 156609813 156609792 156609746 156609692 156609666 156609640 156609609 156609576 156609534 156609333 156609284 156609239 156609180 156609154 156609125 156609095 156609070 
156609051 156609012 156608649 156608627 156608596 156608556 156608510 156608483 156608457 156608434 156608415 156608394 156608329 156608295 156608273 156608221 156608193 156608164 156608130 156608099 156607910 156607888 156607857 156607829 156607805 
156607785 156607763 156607715 156607686 156607663 156607507 156607423 156607399 156607366 156607334 156607287 156607254 156607223 156607181 156607136 156607119 156607095 156607068 156607048 156607020 156606995 156606976 156606957 156606933 156606906 
156606879 156606835 156606778 156606733 156606702 156606665 156606591 156606563 156606542 156606524 156606496 156606474 156606451 156606421 156606399 156606365 156606337 156606296 156606266 156606241 156606221 156606200 156606166 156606126 156606107 
156606086 156606027 156605999 156605965 156605948 156605906 156605885 156605847 156605824 156605805 156605785 156605763 156605733 156605696 156605648 156605618 156605596 156605578 156605556 156605528 156605479 156605416 156605377 156605164 156605139
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-19 00:43:02+00:00): 156605065 156605043 156605012 156604993 156604909 156604878 156604853 156604812 156604792 156604764 156604720 156604660 156604622 156604492 156604468 156604448 156604393 156604181 156604147 156604072 156604040 156603969 156603939 156603864 156603830 
156603770 156603683 156603661 156603564 156603518 156603464 156603375 156603320 156603295 156603248 156603191 156603151 156603077 156603020 156602968 156602920 156602871 156602812 156602736 156602665 156602612 156600158
GerdP (2024-09-21 18:55:40+00:00): Ich hoffe, Du löscht jetzt nicht systematisch die ref=* an Wegweisern und Markern, nur weil Du mit der Info nichts anfangen kannst?
GerdP (2024-09-21 19:32:12+00:00): Oder ist dort evtl. ein neuer Wegweiser aufgestellt worden, bei dem die Nummer nicht mehr vorhanden ist? 
Das passiert gerade im LK Diepholz mit diversen Markern.
citrula (2024-09-23 20:22:22+00:00): Sidewalks should be tagged as highway=footway + footway=sidewalk, not highway=pedestrian. More on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_separate_way
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156798715
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 02:03:44+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164877166
nevw (2024-09-19 05:05:34+00:00): Hi, there is nothing to indicate a wilderness hut on imagery in this park. Was it added in mistake?
tastrax (2024-09-20 08:57:37+00:00): Reverted in changeset 156856577
aharvey (2024-09-19 03:38:05+00:00): hi, could you avoid hitting save in iD after every single object added? You can map out many objects, then just save at the end to create one changeset.
RedAuburn (2024-09-19 03:50:52+00:00): oops, src is https://www.better.org.uk/leisure-centre/london/greenwich/waterfront-leisure-centre
Warin61 (2024-09-20 03:01:35+00:00): Hi,
Way 1316561107 (grass) is not correct, it intersects itself ..
see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.12449&lat=-35.29970&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
habi (2024-09-19 06:40:31+00:00): Ciao xvs2

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Schön bist du hier und hilfst die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

OpenStreetMap versucht die Realität abzubilden. Hier am südlichen Rand des Spilwaldes hat es ziemlich sicher keinen Park Namens abc, der von f geführt wird. Ich habe deine Änderung rückgängig gemacht.

Gruss aus Bern,
habi
habi (2024-09-19 06:41:34+00:00): Revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156803969
fortera_au (2024-09-19 07:49:48+00:00): Hi these are both tagged incorrectly, you've get Good Pilate's street as gym, you'll want leisure=fitness_centre, and for the vacant shop, don't set a name, you can either do disused:shop=* if it's likely to remain the same type of shop, otherwise use disused:shop=yes or shop=vacant
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156800662
robinmetral (2025-02-21 08:07:40+00:00): FYI, this POI already existed but it hadn't been moved when the cafe moved. For the sake of preserving history, I've deleted the new node you created and moved the old node to the new location (and updated its address): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162768564
eggie (2024-09-19 06:03:01+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

De adresnode hoort gewoon op de woning zelf.
Hier ontbrak een toegangsweg. Die heb ik ingetekend.
De routering zal nu voortaan wel lukken.
MVG
eggie
YyellowW (2024-09-19 11:14:19+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
Bedankt hiervoor.
Wanneer ik echter, met deze wijziging, naar Spiekestraat 18 navigeer, zegt hij nog steeds dat de bestemming bereikt is bij Spiekestraat 16 (wat momenteel leidt tot de problemen).
De navigatie ziet momenteel de getekende weg niet als een alternatief.
Weet je hoe we dit op kunnen lossen, zodat de navigatie ons pad ook gaat zien als een optie?
eggie (2024-09-19 11:24:35+00:00): Dag Y.. De updates van de verschillende routeplanner duurt enige tijd.
Voor de osm op de standaardkaart duurt dat een kleine week.
Andere routeplanners updaten heel verschillend.
Dus even geduld 😀

Groet..
eggie
YyellowW (2024-09-19 11:29:59+00:00): Ah, geweldig!
Dankjewel voor je snelle antwoord! Ik ga het over een week nog een keer proberen.
Dankjewel!!
eggie (2024-09-21 09:39:16+00:00): Valhalla is de eerste die het goed doet. De rest heeft nog geen update gehad.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_car&route=51.550045%2C4.509544%3B51.551115%2C4.503638#map=16/51.55087/4.50461
gr eggie
YyellowW (2024-09-21 10:29:22+00:00): Fantastisch!
Bedankt voor het opvolgen!!
Blij dat het nu helemaal goed gaat komen.
Groeten, Ronny.
YyellowW (2024-09-27 05:24:59+00:00): Hoi beste Eggie,
Valhalla en GraphHopper doen het nu perfect; dankjewel!
OSRM krijgt geen route berekend naar Spiekestraat 18, ook niet een verkeerde ("Couldn't find a route between those two places").
Enig idee hoe we dit op kunnen lossen? Moet het huisnummer vastzitten aan de weg, ofzo?
Bedankt weer!!
eggie (2024-09-27 05:34:56+00:00): Dag Ronny.
Het ligt niet aan de kaart.
OSRM werkt nergens momenteel.

Groet..
eggie
eggie (2024-09-27 05:40:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bike&route=51.55003%2C4.50952%3B51.55170%2C4.50370

Fiets- en voetroutering doet het wel.
Gisteravond was er onderhoud aan de osm servers. Wellicht is dat de oorzaak.
eggie (2024-09-29 14:41:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=51.54991%2C4.51422%3B51.55114%2C4.50312#map=15/51.54771/4.51178
YyellowW (2024-09-29 18:22:47+00:00): Fantastisch!! Dankjewel voor alle hulp!
eggie (2024-09-29 18:32:29+00:00): Ronny.. Weet jij toevallig hoe het hiet 'zit'?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157253485#map=15/51.53049/4.51023
Groet..
eggie
Afrandez (2024-09-19 05:14:31+00:00): Nice of me to end up using wrong note from last commit by accident. Intention here is to add some street names observed on site
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-24 21:53:41+00:00): This changeset removed the highway tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135618665
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156801883
Mir76 (2024-10-27 16:37:03+00:00): Если ее видно со спутника (а ее видно), то на местности она точно есть. Откатил.
Kovoschiz (2024-09-19 08:19:20+00:00): Please see previous and guidelines. This connects multiple villages. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=residential
osmviborg (2024-09-19 06:39:53+00:00): Det du har tegnet er en bane forbeholdt busser. Roskildevej er korrekt tagget med turnlanes . Route værktøjet viser korrekt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=55.670162%2C12.444541%3B55.670603%2C12.435420#map=17/55.669789/12.440595 Din fejlnavigation er ikke på grund af OSM.
fortera_au (2024-09-19 07:44:33+00:00): Is Killarney Street actually one lane? If there's no lane markings, you can do lane_markings=no and lanes=2 to indicate there's two lanes but no markings, or just leave the lanes off.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156802716
fortera_au (2024-09-19 09:36:05+00:00): You've also added a name tag to a single node instead of a street, causing a kink in the street.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156802716
eggie (2024-09-19 06:45:23+00:00): Dag Duncan  Ik heb de accesstags aangepast naar G11... . 30 km maxspeed verwijderd behalve op het fietsstraatgedeelte.

MVG
eggie
Frans S (2024-09-19 13:13:28+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
You mapped 10 buildings over existing buildings. Be sure to zoom in far enough (blue message on bottom line shows that there are hidden mappings !
You ignored also the warnings on the Issue triangle. Be sure to solve the issues first.
Further: Issues found on your mappings
A: Inaccurate mapping.
D: Connecting Nodes to other features.
E: Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156803298
Ygramul (2024-09-20 10:20:37+00:00): Hey. Thanks for adding your business to OSM. Two things, though:

1. Keep to how OpenStreetMap structures data, which means there is a defined set of keys and values to be used. The web editor iD which you've used, has presets for many things, so the exact internal details usually don't matter much and you shouldn't even write those directly.

2. Don't use the description as advertising.
AndyB_66 (2024-12-18 14:00:01+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
aceman444 (2024-09-29 22:49:15+00:00): Zdroj nazvu?
Dawid2849 (2024-10-13 17:13:44+00:00): Dodałem start_date=2007
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 03:55:22+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165052548
LySioS (2024-09-27 18:50:48+00:00): Bonjour Rainer,

Je suppose qu'on peut fermer cette note suite à ton changeset ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4446381#c9743193
rainerU (2024-09-28 11:24:21+00:00): Je pense que le fond de carte de Géovélo n'est pas encore à jour. Il manquait aussi in bout de chemin avant la limite de Villeneuve. J'ai fermé la note.
eggie (2024-09-19 07:57:20+00:00): Dag Nicolia,

Ik heb even noexit=yes toegevoegd, want anders zijn die bruggen in een mum weer terug. Ook een note=.... toegevoegd.
MVG
eggie
Ygramul (2024-09-20 07:50:27+00:00): Hi, ich hab mal das abandonedhighway an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48707592 zu abandoned:highway geändert. Da ist wohl der Doppelpunkt verlorengegangen :)
chris66 (2024-09-20 12:41:48+00:00): Uupsie, danke.
aceman444 (2025-02-15 22:01:02+00:00): Amenity mozno OK, ale preco menite typ budovy, ked to ziadna kaplnka nie je?
'shrine' bolo podla mna spravne, tak dokazte preco nie. Taktiez ste mohli vidiet v historii objektu, ze uz som to parkrat opravoval.
5m4u9 (2024-09-20 05:33:53+00:00): Hola, bienvenido!

No tiene sentido el eliminar nombres de cosas que son reales. No queda más que revertir el cambio.
tastrax (2024-09-20 10:57:57+00:00): I think pedestrian signals should not use traffic_signals=signals but traffic_signals=pedestrian_crossing as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_signals

I noted this at the Davey/Elizabeth intersection
tastrax (2024-09-20 11:00:06+00:00): Actually - I am not even sure you need the signals on the pedestrian crossing
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#Traffic_signals_for_pedestrians
martiandeath (2024-09-20 12:32:49+00:00): I think traffic_signals=pedestrian_crossing is only for signalised pedestrian crossings - "A traffic light that only turns red to let pedestrians cross" (first link) - , not for pedestrian crossings at junctions, and I think it is ok to have traffic_signals=signals where the stop buttons are
"You can use highway=traffic_signals for pedestrian crossings to indicate the signals, that is, where to stop or where the button is located." (second link)
aharvey (2024-11-21 00:08:55+00:00): I've never come across this kind of mapping before, so I was surprised that the wiki suggests this. I would think the way being tagged crossing=traffic_signals, and splitting the crossing way so that only the kerb to kerb section is crossing would be sufficient.
s777n (2024-10-18 13:29:41+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы добавили  embankment но его не видно на яндекс панорамах. Там недавно что-то новое вырыли? https://yandex.ru/maps/2/saint-petersburg/?l=stv%2Csta&ll=30.403311%2C59.835210&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=153.174551%2C1.300630&panorama%5Bfull%5D=true&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=30.402487%2C59.835595&panorama%5Bspan%5D=33.158406%2C15.000000&z=16.75
Константин Гам (2024-10-18 14:19:17+00:00): Добрый вечер. Я лишь поменял тег.
Судя по всему это кто-то спутал теги от слова совсем, может обозначал поребрик.... Панораме я вполне верю
nurdafur (2025-01-29 16:45:08+00:00): Hallo North14
Du hast hier wohl aus Versehen bei den Rad- und Skatingrouten eine Lücke produziert, als du das kleine Stück Fussweg links der Kirche eingefügt hast. Ich korrigiere das gerade. Achte doch darauf, wenn du Wege aufteilst oder wie in diesem Fall wohl von einem anderen Weg trennst, dass du allfällige Relationen auch anpasst. 
Liebe Grüsse und weiterhin viel Spass beim Kartografieren.
Frans S (2024-09-19 09:04:08+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please square the buildings you map, and map each building individually rather than collect them as 1 building
Best regards and keep mappings
Frans S (2024-09-19 09:07:28+00:00): Hi. Another issue; you ought to map from the Esri World imagery, Not from Bing.
Best regards
Frans S (2024-09-19 08:22:40+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You managed to map courtyards rather than buildings in 6 out of 12 mappings.
Courtyards are mostly dirty, sand colored and walled plots. Check the walls as well. When you see the footprint of a wall on the ground, it  is no building.
Best regards and keep mapping
Ahmed Abdelkhalek B (2024-09-19 08:28:00+00:00): Thanks Frans S for your feedback, will do my best to consider in my future mapping.
rskedgell (2024-09-19 11:24:13+00:00): For a bus station, you might want something more like:

vehicle=no + bus=designated

rather than psv=yes, as it's more specific and excludes taxi/PHV using non-UK specific routers.

The existing motor_vehicle=designated tag (not added by you) is almost certainly wrong and should be deleted. I think the person who added it mistakenly thought that it meant "for designated vehicles only", but what it actually means is "designated as a right of way for all motor vehicles".

I can't find any street-level imagery, but if the sign at the entrance from Station approach is no entry with an "except buses" plate, the above should work. If it's something different I'll try to help you to find the best tagging here.

I have also added a section to the Busmiles.uk page on the OSM wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Busmiles.uk#Tagging_service_roads_in_bus_stations
rskedgell (2024-09-19 15:22:14+00:00): Access updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156825989
MScanlon (2024-09-24 08:14:48+00:00): Thanks all for your help and advice on this.