piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Friendly_Ghost (2025-08-11 19:12:26+00:00): Reverted my own edit after discussion on Telegram OSM Italia.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170309417
AlbaireN (2026-02-09 10:40:10+00:00): On est d'accord que le défibrillateur a été changé de place (la mairie a déménagé derrière c'est ça ?)

https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?background=aerial&focus=pic&map=19.88/49.1460235/-0.4851112&pic=a5edec48-6348-4a8a-a2c2-16e1ae76e3b4&seq=52855328-aa72-4be1-bd21-8f1e5553d02d&speed=250&theme=age&xyz=320.39/-24.40/0

https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?background=aerial&focus=pic&map=19.88/49.1460235/-0.4851112&pic=a5edec48-6348-4a8a-a2c2-16e1ae76e3b4&seq=52855328-aa72-4be1-bd21-8f1e5553d02d&speed=250&theme=age&xyz=320.39/-24.40/0
karr4s (2026-04-03 18:53:00+00:00): Aucune idée : j'irais voir sur place à l'occasion. ;)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-13 09:23:52+00:00): Impuls został na stałe zamknięty?

( https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4907460
 )
Friendly_Ghost (2025-08-08 10:33:21+00:00): Hi. Again, could you stop adding redundant tags to roads, please?
eggie (2025-08-08 05:20:54+00:00): Dag Open Gld,

Ook zo'n weetje..  Geen adressen toevoegen aan gebouwomtrekken in OSM.
Er zijn al importadresnodes.
Ik heb het adres weer verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
OPEN-GLD (2025-08-08 06:07:56+00:00): Dank je eggie, er valt nog een hoop te leren ;-)
OPEN-GLD (2025-08-08 06:09:49+00:00): Volgens mij moet ik van gebouwen afblijven.
eggie (2025-08-08 06:14:15+00:00): Nou namen toevoegen kan wel.. net als hoogte verdiepingen dakvorm e.d.
Er wordt ook 3D gemapt.
Dat 3D mappen is een aparte tak van sport.
eggie (2025-08-08 06:16:31+00:00): https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.9457871&lon=4.7086723&zoom=19&camera.phi=4.69
eggie (2025-08-08 06:18:57+00:00): Je zou kunnen proberen de Zwaan correct in 3d te krijgen of een dak op de kerk te krijgen ..
Zie wiki 3d mappen.
eggie (2025-08-08 06:23:55+00:00): Voorbeelden https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=52.3736873&lon=4.8916411&zoom=18&camera.phi=8.625
OPEN-GLD (2025-08-08 06:41:49+00:00): Bij de 3D mapping is nog wel wat werk te verrichten inderdaad. Laten we eerst maar even simpel beginnen.
OPEN-GLD (2025-08-08 06:43:16+00:00): Zijn nu de bankjes die ik had toegevoegd nu ook komen te vervallen? Het lijkt erop dat ik er nu een paar mis. Ook de brievenbus kan ik niet meer vinden.
eggie (2025-08-08 06:57:02+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170125135

Wanneer je nog geen effect ziet even CTRL-F5.  Je cache leegmaken. 
Probeer maar.
eggie (2025-08-08 07:00:46+00:00): De brievenbus is 'moet' je toevoegen met 

amenity=post_box  operator=PostNL

Je hebt er iets anders van gemaakt.

MVG
eggie
rempshaener (2025-08-11 10:57:55+00:00): Hallo,
die Nennweite wird ohne Einheit, hier also nur "100", angegeben.
Viele Grüße
user_5359 (2025-08-08 15:18:33+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/4427751855. What is the mean of the tag KerOfis = https://niverel.brezhoneg.bzh/br/kerofis/3567 ? Did you mean the key source?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-08 16:39:01+00:00): czy w jakiś sposób zweryfikowałeś info z tej uwagi?
Tomasz Paprodziad (2025-08-20 21:30:37+00:00): Byłem i widziałem. Dom Kultury przeniesiony na północny zachód "Zameczek".
osmviborg (2025-08-08 05:50:33+00:00): Burde tilføjes: 
fee=yes + fee:conditional=no @ stay < 120 minutes
Kalk80 (2025-08-08 13:16:26+00:00): Thanks. I did not know about conditions.
Kalk80 (2025-08-08 13:30:48+00:00): Ved du om det er muligt at verificere at ens condition er korrekt?
osmviborg (2025-08-08 13:37:59+00:00): Er ikke med på 'ens condition'?
Kalk80 (2025-08-08 13:58:13+00:00): Jeg kunne bare godt tænke mig noget til at validere at min condition er korrekt.
osmviborg (2025-08-08 14:03:50+00:00): Er det dette du tænker på: https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=Conditional_restrictions#_Condition
Kalk80 (2025-08-08 14:15:57+00:00): Ja, jeg kunne godt bare ha brugt et værktøj der lige kunne validere det for mig :)
osmviborg (2025-08-08 14:16:06+00:00): Der er også denne: https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=Key:fee
osmviborg (2025-08-08 14:27:24+00:00): Aner ikke om et sådan findes. Kunne selvfølgelig være nyttigt. Der er mange eksempler i wiki'en.
marc__marc (2025-08-27 07:00:20+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1420817985
can you review access=no ? how car go to the parking or use the emergency access ? it look like to be private and/or emergency=yes
BHiko (2025-08-27 14:28:08+00:00): Currently, cars are allowed to use the busbaan and access=destination for access to spoed... Or use ring noord.
BHiko (2025-08-27 14:30:38+00:00): Small parking next to dagcentrum is closed.
rempshaener (2025-08-11 11:54:40+00:00): Hallo,
Löschwasserbrunnen mit oder ohne Pumpe sind in der Anlage etwas knifflig.
Derzeit sind folgende Daten erfasst:

Zu den einzelnen Angaben:
-fire_hydrant:diameter=110 mm
Die Nennweite bezieht sich immer auf die Nennweite der Wasserleitung. Bei einem Brunnen ist diese Angabe daher nicht richtig.
- fire_hydrant:type=suction_point
Das würde nur passen, wenn es sich um eine Entnahmestelle mittels Saugkorb aus offenem Gewässer handelt. Fest verrohrte Anschlüsse sind immer fire_hydrant:type=pipe

Um zu zeigen, dass eine elektrische Pumpe verbaut ist, nutzt man fire_hydrant:pressure=yes.

D. h. es ergäbe sich

couplings:diameters=A
couplings:type=Storz
couplings=1
description=Löschbrunnen, Entnahme mittels elektronischer Pumpe, Inbetriebnahme mittels Drehschalter rechts am grauen Kasten, Stromeinspeisung möglich
emergency=fire_hydrant
fire_hydrant:position=green
fire_hydrant:pressure=yes
fire_hydrant:type=pipe
survey:date=2023-07-24
water_source=groundwater

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag.

Viele Grüße
gurglypipe (2025-08-07 22:15:23+00:00): Heya, even if this path is blocked on the ground, it still exists as a legal right of way (it’s on the definitive map of rights of way for the area), so should be mapped.

If it’s blocked in reality, that needs to be reported to the council’s rights of way department: go to https://www.cumberland.gov.uk/parks-culture-and-leisure/countryside-access and click ‘Make an enquiry about public rights of way’
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-10 13:44:12+00:00): I'm not quite sure what would possess a non-SEO-spammer to add SEO spam tags to all these POIs apparently of their own accord, but I removed the SEO spam junk tags (blatant advertising in description=*, nonfree external image=* of the company logo instead of a photo of the location) and fixed opening_hours=* and other tags for East High Street POIs in changeset 183924790

https://osm.org/changeset/183924790

See https://osm.wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam and https://osm.wiki/Key:description#No_advertising for more information.
nona mostafa (2025-08-10 11:38:52+00:00): Hi Amineee__,
I hope that you're well,
Regarding the update for  "الطريق المداري الشمالي الشرقي بأكادير"
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356795743
 I know that you have information confirming that it has been opened.
However, I noticed that you changed access=no to access=yes for:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356795742
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356795743
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1348058282
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1348058280
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1252417051
But the access tag was not updated for:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1348701804
This has caused those roads to become floating:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1348058280
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356795743
Also, motor_vehicle=yes was added, but not consistently across all the related ways:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356795743
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1348058282
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1252417051
Could you please make those adjustments?
Greetings
nona mostafa
Dodko (2025-11-02 18:39:05+00:00): Nepridávajte slovo pošta do názvu pošty, je to vyjadrené značkou amenity=post_office

https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/afglwDyRtBM/m/KuTRHFecAwAJ
user_5359 (2025-08-08 15:14:41+00:00): Hallo! Hie sind einige Notationsfehler
Model = E160 (meinst Du generator:model?)
generator:output:electricity = 5,65 MW (britische Schreibweise 5.65 MW)
high:hub = 166 m (meinst DU height:hub? Standardeinheit ist Meter, das m wäre dann überflüssig)
manufactorer = Enercon (meinst Du manufacturer?)
rotor:diameter = 160 m (Standardeinheit ist Meter, das m wäre dann überflüssig)
start_date = 10/2025 (Schreibweise in der Reihenfolge Jahr-Monat-Tag also hier 2025-10)
ika-chan! (2025-08-08 07:40:36+00:00): A concern has been raised about this changeset, which resulted in breaking changes to navigation tools in the area. Please read and respond at: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/report-vandalism-or-concerns-about-edits-here/4223/207
Dodko (2025-08-08 13:28:48+00:00): Budova sa nevytvára pridaním bodu nad budovu a názvom.
marczoutendijk (2026-01-11 13:02:41+00:00): building:levels=1234
Is that a joke?
eggie (2025-08-08 05:16:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
AgusQui (2025-08-15 02:51:19+00:00): Porque?, es una avenida que conecta importantes centros urbanos, Acceso Oeste con Buen Ayre, Camino de Cintura con ruta 8
silversurfer83 (2025-08-08 11:09:14+00:00): Hi Holger,

kurze Info: Du hast hier die Daten des Gebäudes auf dem Punkt für die Adresse erfasst. Ich habe die Daten mal auf den Gebäudeumriss geschoben, wo sie eigentlich hingehören :)

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170129339
GeorgeKaplan (2025-12-09 03:31:42+00:00): Bonjour, il y a une remarque sur ce RP dans https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5084012
homer__simpsons (2025-12-09 11:44:37+00:00): Hello, merci de la remarque, j'ai corrigé le tag manquant (ainsi que le tag) avec https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175709334
user_5359 (2025-08-08 14:28:13+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1420839089. What is the mean of building:oarts = yes. I assume you mean building:parts = yes. But why?
pyrog (2025-08-17 14:04:37+00:00): J'ai corrigé le schéma de tag des lames de ce poteau.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10059780178/history

Il y a des différences entre la photo de 2022 et ta description.
As-tu une photo plus récente ?
icluf (2025-08-18 06:36:12+00:00): Salut Pyrog, j'ai lu tes différents commentaires. Je ne suis pas chez moi ces jours et pourrais te répondre plus précisément peut-être mercredi, sinon en fin de semaine. Pour patienter, voila ce que je peux dire. J'ai des photos de tous les panneaux que j'ai mis à jour mais je n'ai pas encore pris le temps de les pousser sur Panoramax. Sinon, je vais avoir besoin d'éclaircissement sur le schéma de tags des lames de panneau, car je suivais jusque là un schéma cardinal (direction_north=, etc.) tel que je l'ai vu exploité sur WaymarkedTrails ou Knoppuntnet. Ta manière de taguer est plus segmentée, donc mieux je trouve, peut-être avais-je vu ce schéma quand j'ai débuté la cartographie, mais sans avoir compris son fonctionnement.Il y a un gros travail de repassage à faire car j'ai complété une petite centaine de panneaux avec infos cardinales. De façon plus globale, je suis intéressé par la représentation cartographique des réseaux de chemin et je me suis mis en tête de compléter les infos du réseau Arlysere, en particulier sur le bassin d'Albertville où je fais pas mal d'activités sportives. A+
pyrog (2025-08-18 06:52:41+00:00): Super pour les photos, les miennes commencent à dater et je n'ai pas tout trouver à l'époque.

Le schéma indique les lames, pas leur orientation par rapport au nord (on pourrait l'ajouter aussi mais ça fait encore du boulot en plus et ça ne me semble pas nécessaire).

En fait il est basé sur le schéma des panneaux routiers, mais avec des infos en plus.
On pourrait même ajouter le balisage avec osmc:symbol, mais je préfère déjà le faire pour les itinéraires.

Knoppuntnet malheureusement ne gère pas les panneaux 🥲

WaymarkedTrails le fait à minina. C'est Mueschel qui a un rendu plus poussé. Il affiche des flèches en fonction de l'orientation des lames par rapport au nord. On a échangé quelques messages mais je ne l'ai pas relancé.

Cool pour ton travail sur Arlysère.

Merci.
Yves
icluf (2025-09-03 15:55:30+00:00): Re pyrog,
La photo du panneau (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10059780178) est désormais sur Panoramax (https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?background=streets&date_from=2025-03-03&focus=pic&map=17.88/45.674657/6.37291&pic=32996200-7bc1-490e-9cbb-6ed2c77dd82a&speed=250&theme=default&xyz=353.31/0.75/0).

Pour le schéma de tag des lames de poteau, reprendre celui des panneaux routiers me parait complexe. Mais je pense que c'est dû à une question de perspective. Etant donné que je n'utilise pas de routage gps pour me guider en randonnée, je voyais un intérêt "naturel", en ce sens que je ne me suis même pas posé la question, à inscrire une donnée cardinale. Et vu que WaymarkedTrails met en avant ces données, j'ai suivi ce schéma plutôt que celui que tu pratiques.

icluf
jbcharron (2025-08-15 15:08:42+00:00): Merci pour les contributions sur St-Dié
Pour information le tag addr:city et addr:postcode n'est pas nécessaire grace aux relations de type boundary qui permettent de retrouver le code postal et la ville d'un lieu
Bonne soirée
user_5359 (2025-08-08 12:23:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between name and description. One possible description is
traffic_signals:direction=forward
traffic_signals=signal
Camicamu (2025-08-07 23:58:25+00:00): ROSTERIET VIVIENDA COLECTIVA
b-jazz (2025-08-09 02:14:31+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1420847505, et al

When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. Take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Golf.png for an example of the "Wrong" way to map a fairway and a green along with the right way. There are some cases where a fringe exists around a green and you should draw the fairway outline completely around a green. Other times, the fairway and green butt up against each other. In that case the fairway and green should share the same nodes at the boundary between the two. When drawing these shared nodes, editors like iD (built into openstreetmap.org) will "snap" to an existing node if you get close enough. If you could go back and clean up where you've made this mistake, that would be great. But more importantly, if you could stop from doing this in the future, it would be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out. Thanks.
Koreller (2025-08-10 21:44:06+00:00): Hello, thanks for contributing in OSM in North Korea. What is the source that helps you add these shops?
campbelltree (2025-10-10 22:00:49+00:00): I partially reverted this change in 173114642, because you accidentally deleted address information.
b-jazz (2025-10-10 22:15:57+00:00): Thanks for letting me know!
diodaix (2025-08-09 08:45:12+00:00): Berarti nodes kecamatan dihapus saja ya pak? tidak jadi diganti tagnya ke place=district/county?
Danil (2025-09-06 16:06:46+00:00): Maaf notifikasi emailnya telat.

Node kecamatan hanya berguna sebelum relasi kecamatan ada untuk memperkirakan suatu lokasi (triangulasi). Lebih baik dihapus kalau relasi kecamatannya sudah ada.

Yang masih ragu cuma soal ibukota kecamatan yang bukan salah satu desa/kelurahan, biasanya kecamatan lama dan ibukota asli sudah mengalami pemekaran.

Ditingkat kabupaten juga banyak ibukota yang bukan salah satu kecamatan, biasa disebut ibukota non-administratif (tidak punya kode Kemendagri). Di OSM diberi tag place=town.... nah untuk tingkat ibukota kecamatan "non-administratif" mau diberi tag apa?
diodaix (2025-09-07 03:10:23+00:00): Setahu saya aturan tagging untuk ibukota kan di key capital=* kan pak, seperti Palau saja ibukota negaranya Ngerulmud (osm.org/node/4244310289) diberi tag place=village dan capital=2. Maka sejatinya pada ibukota kecamatan non-administratif boleh menggunakan tag place=town agar menunjukkan adanya sebuah kota di lokasi tsb, lalu kelurahan/desa (place=village) tempat kedudukan kantor camat diberikan tag capital=6, jika memang ground truth nya begitu. Adapun untuk ibukota kabupaten karena biasanya nama non-administratif sudah terlampir di Perda, maka aturannya bisa berbeda lagi. Yang masih saya takutkan untuk keliru adalah konsistensi data di Indonesia yang sering disebut-sebut ini. Diskusi Mapper global sebenarnya lebih mementingkan populasi ketimbang statusnya pak, sehingga berbanding terbalik dengan kita yang berusaha preserve tagging berdasarkan status administratif. Dari saya sendiri, upaya untuk mempertahankan status bisa dengan memasukkan kode kemendagri pakai key ref:ID:kemendagri sehingga konsistensi datanya bisa dirujuk dari tag tersebut. (Artinya, kalau tidak punya kode kemendagri berarti bukan administratif, tapi kalau belum lengkap seperti ini, sepertinya masih jauh perjalanannya ya hehe)
diodaix (2025-09-07 03:14:34+00:00): Soalnya kalau diberi tag place=suburb, pedomannya bilang kalau itu buat bagian dari kota besar begitu pak, tapi sebetulnya kalau kita menyeragamkan mungkin bisa jadi pengecualian nantinya.
diodaix (2025-09-07 05:46:19+00:00): Atau bisa saja diberikan tag note=non_administrative, bagaimana pak?
Danil (2025-09-07 09:17:02+00:00): iya, capital=* menyatakan ibukota.

Suburb itu rekomendasi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines untuk membedakan kelurahan dengan desa.

ref:ID:kemendagri tidak perlu, langsung pakai ref saja.... karena itu kode wilayah administratif resmi Indonesia. Kode BPS (Wilkerstat) justru bukan, itu kode statistik dan sifatnya internal mereka, terkadang 2 desa bisa digabung dalam satu Wilkerstat bahkan era sensus penduduk 2010 banyak kode BPS dengan nama "Lainnya" :)

Untuk ref=* pulau juga pakai dari Kemendagri sedangkan ref untuk sekolah pakai NPSN.
Danil (2025-09-07 09:43:18+00:00): Kelengkapan kode administratif sebenarnya tidak terlalu sulit karena di [wikidata juga saya urus](https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Danil_Satria/P2588) dan sebulan terakhir saya lagi persiapan update data dengan [SK Mendagri 300.2.2-2138 Tahun 2025](https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q134593216) untuk kode pulau selesai sementara wil. admin minggu ini harusnya sudah mulai upload.

Data mentahnya kita lengkap kok, rencana sambil upload saya mau rancang mekanisme input data tersebut ke OSM dengan sistematis... ujicoba di Prov. Jambi rasanya sudah memberi gambaran.
diodaix (2025-09-07 13:01:52+00:00): Kira-kira dalam input data tsb apa cara yang dilakukan agar menjadi sistematis pak?
Danil (2025-09-11 11:54:26+00:00): Rencana sekarang dimulai dengan melengkapi koordinat desa/kelurahan/nagari/nagori/pekon/lembang/dll di wikidata lalu per kabupaten (via OpenRefine) diubah ke TSV atau GeoJson untuk dimerge dengan node village existing (via JOSM) agar history nodenya terjaga.

Pengalaman di Jambi, yang buat lambat adalah letak node OSM masih banyak yang "nyasar” dan koordinat Wikidata juga kadang kurang akurat, jadi tidak bisa hanya copy-paste tag... harus mencarikan letak desanya juga.

Namun setidaknya dua versi koordinat tersebut bisa jadi ancar2, dibantu dengan RBI dan WebGIS BPS.
NeisReview (2025-08-08 05:51:00+00:00): #NameTag

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I’ve taken a look at your recent edits, especially those involving name tags. Some of the names you’ve added caught my attention, as they seem a bit unusual. As noted in the OSM Wiki, the name tag should contain only the actual name of the feature—not descriptions, types, locations, family names, addresses, or other attributes.

Could you please confirm whether these entries were intentional or possibly added by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

---
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:name
dknelson9876 (2025-08-10 02:50:36+00:00): Hello Always_Dreamin,

Thank you for all of your recent edits in Utah. In the future, can you please write more descriptive changeset comments than just repeating "Updated tagging"? Phrases such as "Added zip code", "Merged POI into building", or "Removed addr:country" are a lot more helpful for people who are trying to review changesets.
Always_Dreamin (2025-08-10 03:08:13+00:00): Hello dknelson9876,
The project I'm working on required editing each changeset with pretty much the same scheme. I switched it up depending on the kind of feature being interacted with and whether it was added or modified. I thought I was being detailed enough with that. Perhaps you could give me insight into your process and goal(s) so that I might ensure we are collaborating most effectively. 

Best regards,
Always_Dreamin
donmac703 (2025-10-10 11:45:31+00:00): Newleaf Parade is marked as one-way, but TfNSW buses are apparently still travelling the other direction. The current imagery doesn't appear to indicate one-way traffic. Please Check.
Rovastar (2025-08-08 21:32:00+00:00): Why are you moving nodes in this changeset when they are correct? 
this change isn't about brand it is about moving nodes to incorrect lcations
ZeLonewolf (2025-08-08 22:27:51+00:00): Hi, can you point me to where a node was moved? This should have been a tag change only.
TheNightRider (2025-08-18 16:17:57+00:00): At least for the Supercharger in Post, TX, ZeLonewolf's changeset only removed a tag. Coordinates weren't touched, but I just restored them to their correct original values before they were overwritten by the 2025-06-22 bulk import from SCinfo (which had coords that were 27.7 off, not huge, but visible).
TheNightRider (2025-08-18 16:18:19+00:00): 27.7 ft off
ZeLonewolf (2025-08-08 02:41:42+00:00): Sorry for the large bbox, didn't realize I grabbed a node from American Samoa
InsertUser (2025-08-08 21:43:52+00:00): What is the benefit of removing the human readable tag in favour of something more opaque?
ZeLonewolf (2025-08-08 22:26:42+00:00): Hi InsetUser,
Please see the linked discussion.
opendcc (2025-09-01 17:36:12+00:00): Hallo, ich war da heute vor Ort. Der Zugang zu diesem Weg ist nicht beschränkt.
Access Claims (komoot) (2026-06-02 15:42:30+00:00): Hallo,

entschuldigen Sie bitte die späte Rückmeldung. Unser Team hat sich seit den ursprünglichen Änderungen verändert.

Vielen Dank für die Vor-Ort-Prüfung und die Rückmeldung. Wir haben die Angaben berücksichtigt und die entsprechenden Tags inzwischen angepasst.

Vielen Dank für Ihre Hilfe und Ihren Beitrag zur Genauigkeit der Karte.
aharvey (2025-08-09 04:10:45+00:00): I've restored the way but changed the tags to be a private driveway rather than public street.
buy_osmand (2025-08-08 07:33:49+00:00): #Al_fatiha!; 
In the name of Allah, raḥmānir-raḥīm; 
al-ḥamdu lillāhi, Lord of the Worlds
; ar-raḥmānir-raḥīm
; māliki yaumid-dīn
; iyyāka na’budu wa iyyāka nasta’īn
; Guide us the Straight path
; ṣirāṭallażīna an’amta ‘alaihim gairil-magḍụbi ‘alaihim wa laḍ-ḍāllīn (https://quranmorphology.com/surah/1);
Kovoschiz (2025-08-08 04:46:40+00:00): Please don't delete it directly, as the 124m still exists on its own. Only edit the names if they are wrong.
honnip (2025-08-08 14:23:30+00:00): 안녕하세요. 6, 7, 8번 출구는 추가가 안 된 이유가 있을까요?
Potatoleum (2025-08-22 14:30:39+00:00): The North Lincoln Drive connection to 61 has been closed and partially demolished. It shouldn't be on the map. I will remove it again.
Kaduna (2025-08-22 16:41:45+00:00): Hi Potatoleum, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
Potatoleum (2025-08-23 01:55:55+00:00): Yeah, it's no problem really. It's my fault for not adding a lifecycle prefix. I did that now so it shouldn't happen again :D
Kaduna (2025-08-25 12:54:26+00:00): Hi Potatoleum, Thank you for the clarification. Happy mapping!
B252697 (2026-01-08 13:55:19+00:00): Hi! I think the position of Jalan Selamat Road needs some adjustments!  If you look at Onemap Orthophoto layer, you would notice that the positioning is off