piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
scai (2026-01-06 13:23:03+00:00): Hi,

du hast bei verschiedenen teilAuto-Stellplätzen den operator von "teilAuto eG" zurück auf "Mobility Center GmbH" geändert. Die Geschäftsform hat sich geändert, daher ist "teilAuto eG" korrekt. Bitte die Vorschläge von iD prüfen bevor du sie übernimmst. Ich weiß leider nicht, warum iD offensichtlich immer noch den veralteten operator anbietet.

Habe das mal wieder korrigiert, ebenso dieselben Änderungen aus https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176715689.

Grüße
Alex
Copymaster86 (2026-01-06 15:34:50+00:00): Hallo, vielen lieben Dank für die Nachricht, dass es dir aufgefallen ist und das korrigieren. Vielleicht werden die Daten aus dem wikidata-Eintrag nicht korrekt übernommen? https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2400658
scai (2026-01-06 19:22:47+00:00): Eigentlich müssten diese Einträge aus dem name-suggestion-index (https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index) stammen, dort hatte ich brand und operator für teilAuto auch entsprechend aktualisiert. Entweder sind die Änderungen immer noch nicht in iD übernommen, was komisch wäre da sie bereits vor 2 Monaten stattgefunden haben. Oder das funktioniert etwas anders als ich es bisher verstanden habe.

Wikidata ist glaube ich keine gültige Quelle für OSM, daher dürfte das keine Rolle spielen (dort hatte ich den Eintrag aber auch aktualisiert).
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-30 22:34:11+00:00): This got added to the map in the middle of the southbound traffic lane...where's this camera mounted?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176628946
RobM12 (2025-12-31 00:24:18+00:00): I had some kind of glitch adding and I think it added two flocks, haven't been able to undo.
It's probably just my ignorance with the system....it's mounted on a pole on the west side of the road oriented south southeast.
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-31 03:13:32+00:00): Yeah, no worries, it's an easy fix.  Sliding the errant one onto the good one (in the web editor "id") or selecting the errant node(s) first, then the good node, then select merge if you're using JOSM.  In this case I saw the good one and merged the mistaken one onto the good one.

In either case, thanks for helping out OpenStreetMap!
Frans S (2026-02-04 14:20:32+00:00): Hi. During a cleanup I came again across duplicated buildings. task 1556.
Are you zooming in far enough ? otherwise, already mapped buildings don't show up.
See this changeset as well.
Changeset: 176661746
I wil remove the duplicated ones.
Best regards
Frans S (2026-02-04 14:29:53+00:00): Hi I see that you tagged a building with 2 courtyards  incorrect.
the building itself and both courtyards are to be mapped as building=yes.
Then make it a multypolygon.
Best regards
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-12-30 15:39:10+00:00): Hi eiriks, just take care when you draw the coastlines, they need to be drawn counterclockwise. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcoastline
NeisBot (2025-12-31 07:12:59+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 151 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1462795390 v2 | 56 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1462772225 v4 | 21 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1462813158 v3 | 21 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176629534
NeisReview (2026-01-17 16:35:43+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177310863
stasiu512 (2025-12-30 14:19:51+00:00): Cześć, nie twórz fikcji, OSM to nie miejsce do testowania, tylko do mapowania stanu faktycznego. Zmiana wycofana.
literan (2025-12-31 15:13:43+00:00): насчет ворот. motor_vehicle=yes означает, что любому автомобилю въезд свободный. Полагаю, это не так, исправляю на motor_vehicle=private

эти теги - это юиридческий запрет/разрешение. Т.е. foot=no это значит что пешеходам там проходить запрещено
Rainero (2026-03-30 08:54:05+00:00): Revert changeset/180618382
wegen nicht zulässiger Quelle (Bayernatlas).
mcliquid (2026-01-01 09:22:45+00:00): Hello brt1ituk, thank you for fixing the address issue and for your contributions with iD.

A quick note about this changeset: it includes edits ranging from London to Venice, covering locations that are far apart. Even when addressing similar issues, grouping such distant edits into a single changeset makes it harder for other mappers to review or revert individual changes.

For future edits, please consider:

* keeping each changeset focused on one local area,
* uploading your changes before moving on to a different city or country,
* creating separate changesets when working on issues in distant regions.

You can find more information here:
[https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets)

Thanks for your understanding, and happy mapping!
Udarian (2025-12-30 18:55:52+00:00): all of the other addresses in the area have a postcode of 33122, what this used to be, what is your source for this change.
Scalarik (2026-01-22 10:05:49+00:00): This change is wrong. The buildings are part of the same parcel Kersantintie 2, and have the letter already included in addr:unit tag. The official number of houses is 2, without the letter, and addr:housenumber should reflect this.
rle32795 (2026-02-07 13:14:37+00:00): As these are detached houses, aren't the letters written together and in lower case officially though?
Scalarik (2026-02-07 13:46:16+00:00): The cities keep track of the parcels and houses separately. In this case, the parcel is Kersantintie 2, no letters. Similarly, Kersantintie 5a and 5b are separate parcels, and their naming reflects that. Parcels are (at least in larger Helsinki area) always named with a number and lowercase letter together. The lettering often results from dividing old parcels. This format can be seen in official city maps as well.

House specific letters on the same parcel are written separately (2 A, 2 B, etc). This same naming convention goes for high-rise entrances as well. addr:unit is how this information is usually tracked.

There is also the special case where a separated parcel has multiple houses. E.g. Rakuunatie has 13a and 13b, with 13a now having multiple buildings. These are, then, Rakuunatie 13a A, Rakuunatie 13a B and Rakuunatie 13a C, with individual apartments designated Rakuunatie 13a A1 etc. It can get quite confusing, but the case of the letter keeps parcel and building data separate.

Of course what's depicted on the ground can be quite confusing. (My father was an architect and was always quick to point out when houses had their entrance numbers in wrong case and such). It's quite difficult to know from the outside which case is which, are the parcels separate and so on. But when there is a kiinteistöosakeyhtiö, it's number for the parcel and capital letter after space for the building, like in this case. The telltale sign for similar cases is often a common map of the houses, something separate parcels would not have (and here can be found at the start of Kersantintie).

Hopefully this clarifies the mess. Further confusion comes when addr:unit is not shown on all maps, luckily default OSM has that.
rle32795 (2026-02-08 06:18:43+00:00): Thanks for the explanation.
It seemingly differs between places, by how things look like. I had a thought it could be like that.
arjunaraoc (2026-01-01 11:23:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Thanks for resolving it yourself.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176630942
totera (2025-12-31 11:16:14+00:00): Non sono duplicati anche se hanno lo stesso nome e gestore, un bar è all'ingresso del terminal ("land side"), l'altro nell'area imbarchi ("air side")
notmyproblem1 (2026-01-06 14:47:59+00:00): come da risposta su telegram ,pensavo che giovipen aveva già controllato e richiesto la cancellazione ad altri contributori nel gruppo telegram
marcmarti (2025-12-31 02:25:47+00:00): Hello, please familiarize yourself with how to create routes, the tags are incorrect. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses
gscholz (2026-01-06 11:11:39+00:00): Hi Enz_11,
this error still exists:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=0.17788&lat=49.51612&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can we get your feedback here?
Guido
Andrea Musuruane (2026-03-19 15:53:07+00:00): Non si modifica la grafia perché il TTS che usi non è in grado di pronunciare correttamente il nome della via.
fparri (2026-03-21 19:39:49+00:00): Come si fa in questi casi di solito? Si usa name:pronunciation?
Andrea Musuruane (2026-03-22 08:19:37+00:00): E' una possibilità. Occhio che devi usare l'IPA: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:pronunciation. Comunque questo tag si dovrebbe usare per casi particolari. Questa via invece non ha nulla di strano. Un accento sulla penultima sillaba è una cosa frequentissima nella lingua italiana.
fparri (2026-03-22 12:03:08+00:00): Usareipa non è un problema. Il problema della via è che i TTS pronunciano págano (verbo pagare) e non pagáno😉
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-01 08:33:54+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Zarzecze":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13418301959

"Majscowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488463704
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488463713
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488463715
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/940992101

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-02 01:23:54+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Zarzecze":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13418301959

"Majscowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488463704
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488463713
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488463715
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/940992101

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2025-12-31 07:13:11+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 153 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1462654661 v2 | 34 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1462695706 v4 | 29 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1462620500 v5 | 26 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176632416
NeisReview (2026-01-07 17:38:43+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/176664712
Benoît C MdP (2026-01-05 08:55:05+00:00): Bonjour Wikiscout,

Je n'ai pas compris pourquoi tu as supprimé des doubles sens cyclables. J'ai corrigé en conséquence.

Bonne continuation

Benoît
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-27 23:58:50+00:00): DWG revert - apparent undiscussed Organised import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177784427
Frans S (2026-01-14 11:25:53+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. We welcome you as a new mapper.
Please restrict yourself to the required subject.
You added woodland and with that, you introduced errors with the buildings, which have to be corrected.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-12-31 10:51:46+00:00): Adjusted bad mappings
SafwatHalaby (2026-01-02 09:38:50+00:00): שלום! אם אתה מנסה להדביק את הרחובות טוב יותר לתצלומי האוויר, שים לב שתצלומי האוויר עצמם לפעמים לא מיושרים וממש חשוב ליישר אותם לפני שסומכים עליהם.

מדריך כאן: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/He:Aerial_imagery_quickstart
SafwatHalaby (2026-01-02 09:39:16+00:00): בנוסף, מומלץ מאוד לכתוב הסבר יותר תאורי לשינוי במקום "שינויים קטנים" כדי שממפים אחרים יבינו מיד מה השתנה
Assaf jerry (2026-01-02 11:04:07+00:00): תודה על העזרה! מעריך מאוד. איזה סוג תיאור רגיל כותבים? אשמך לדוגמה. ושוב תודה על העזרה.
SafwatHalaby (2026-01-02 15:10:06+00:00): אתה צריך לתאר בקצרה מה עשית. אין חוק זהב ואנשים שונים בוחרים לפרט ברמות שונות. 

הנה דוגמאות היסטוריית העריכה של כמה משתמשים כדי שתהיה לך תחושה כללית:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/zstadler/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/NeatNit/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SafwatHalaby/history
Assaf jerry (2026-01-02 15:45:09+00:00): תודה על הדוגמאות, ותודה על הסבלנות. מעריך מאוד.
Taya_S (2025-12-30 19:01:28+00:00): Reverted vandalism. Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19238

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176643535
Leo Joyero (2025-12-30 15:59:30+00:00): LeoJoyero💎
NeisBot (2025-12-31 07:13:17+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/251128122 v6 | 8 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/9692152644 v3
https://osm.org/node/2652334953 v2
https://osm.org/node/2652334959 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176635376
NeisReview (2026-01-07 17:41:50+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/176865548
zstadler (2026-06-15 13:56:34+00:00): שלום Flayer,

תודה על תרומתך המתמשכת למיפוי 
OSM!

אם התגית 
ref 
לא השנתה, אז התגית 
highway
לא צריכה להשתנות

Hello  Flayer

Thank you for your continued contribution to OSM!

Since the ref tag was unchanged, highway tag should not have been changed.

Здравствуйте, Flaer!

Спасибо за ваш постоянный вклад в OSM!

Поскольку метка ссылки осталась неизменной, метка шоссе не должна была быть изменена.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-27 23:45:16+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177784168
eggie (2025-12-30 21:05:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-31 21:41:56+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее
Mr_Karen (2026-01-01 17:00:22+00:00): Благодарю!!!! С новым годом Вас!!!
Pyknite (2026-01-22 10:32:45+00:00): This changeset is WRONG, old chairlift had been replaced by a new gondola already active from 4/12/26, see official sources:

https://www.dolomitisuperski.com/it/live-info/impianti/arabba-marmolada

https://www.facebook.com/mydolomiti.italian/photos/-nuova-cabinovia-nuova-esperienzala-nuova-cabinovia-lezuo-ha-sostituito-la-vecch/129279688
Pyknite (2026-01-22 10:35:05+00:00): https://www.facebook.com/mydolomiti.italian/photos/-nuova-cabinovia-nuova-esperienzala-nuova-cabinovia-lezuo-ha-sostituito-la-vecch/1292796882877167/ this is fixed second link, additionally you can check here that old chairlift had been removed https://www.skiresort.it/comprensorio-sciistico/arabba-marmolada/impianti-risalita/l664/ , and here a video showing the new gondola working and accessible to skiers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44bLv2oD2RA
Kookykooky (2026-01-22 13:07:09+00:00): Hi,
ok, sorry for the incorrect correction.
I'll be more careful next time.
Kookykooky
NeisBot (2025-12-31 07:25:55+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/442077399 v4

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Insurance agency in Madison Indiana"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisRevert (2026-01-07 17:42:29+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176954371
eggie (2025-12-30 21:11:19+00:00): Dag Maraderi.. Probeer bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnodes. Dus zelf adressen aanmaken is niet nodig.

MVG
eggie
maraderi (2025-12-31 08:59:46+00:00): Dag eggie, nu pas snap ik wat daarmee bedoeld werd. Die adresnodes zie ik pas als ik flink inzoom. Dank
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-27 23:58:51+00:00): DWG revert - apparent undiscussed Organised import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177784427
Frans S (2025-12-31 12:16:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
PLease don't forget to square each rectangular building.
Don't you use the building plugin ?
When you map with that plugin, it delivers fair, squared corners !
Check this wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools
Best regards
mjt71 (2025-12-31 12:35:29+00:00): Hello,
Thank you for the feedback. yes, I do use the builing plugin but sometimes I create a building by joining two squares and I must have forgotten to square the joined building(s). Will be more attentive in the future.
Best regards
Norbert Dichter (2025-12-30 18:11:23+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176637760
𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ (2025-12-30 20:32:54+00:00): Zmiana w większej części spoko. Uczepiłbym się jednak obszaru drzew na tym cmentarzu - lepiej zaznaczyć drzewa osobno niż jako całość.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176637811
𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ (2025-12-30 20:34:30+00:00): Przy okazji, zmień język strony OSM na j. polski, lepiej się edytuje w iD gdy presety są po polsku.

Preferences > Preferred Language > polski
Syhmac (2025-12-30 23:10:39+00:00): Dzięki za podpowiedź. Jeśli z drzewami chodziło ci o oznaczanie każdego drzewa z osobna, to nie ma opcji, że to zrobię. Nawet jeśli miałbym ochotę, to nie mam na to czasu, bo w tej wsi tylko parę tygodni w roku, a wygląda na to, że jest tam dość sporo tych drzew.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176637811
Rainero (2025-12-31 09:08:11+00:00): Hallo befega,

die Lizenzfrage zur Nutzung der Luftbilder der Bayerischen Vermessungsverwaltung ist noch nicht geklärt. Deshalb sind die Luftbilder bei den Editoren JOSM und iD nicht eingebunden.
Es gibt dazu eine lange Diskussion im Forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bayern-ab-01-01-2023-sind-viele-geobasisdaten-der-vermessungsverwaltung-kosten-frei-verfugbar-nutzbarkeit-fur-osm-ist-noch-zu-prufen/7051/232
Sobald Klarheit besteht, wird das dort mitgeteilt.
In vielen Teilen Bayerns sind die Esri Bilder (nicht Esri Clarity) derzeit die aktuellsten Luftbilder.

Servus,
Rainer
befega (2025-12-31 17:51:14+00:00): Hallo Rainer, 
ok, verstehe, die leidige Bürokratie. Meine Mapping stimmt mit den Esri Bildern überein. Die Quellenangabe könnte dahingehend geändert werden. 
Grüße
Ben
Norbert Dichter (2025-12-30 18:10:53+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176638093
rskedgell (2025-12-30 19:31:42+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The international format UK phone numbers which are used in OSM lose the '0' trunk prefix - see phone=* for more details.

I've changed it back to
phone=+44 20 7625 1027
in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176644645
NeisBot (2025-12-31 07:13:26+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 18 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/9111173 v15 | 15 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/11124102566 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176638393
NeisReview (2026-01-07 17:41:50+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/176649264
kadiwa (2025-12-31 13:21:52+00:00): An einigen Straßen fehlen nun wieder die Querungsmöglichkeiten für Fußgänger, z. B. hier https://osm.org/way/1462849973 Es kam deshalb der Wunsch auf, dass du die einträgst, falls du in der Nähe lebst und das vor Ort nachschauen könntest. Vor Ort Nachschauen ist die angemessenste Art und Weise, Fußwege an solchen Kreuzungen zu mappen.
Siehe https://osm.org/note/5111551
Đuro Jiří (2026-02-16 18:49:07+00:00): Ciao, attenzione, bisogna aggiungere anche tag descrittivo,in questo caso
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dsupermarket
Corretto.

E anche ho notato, che hai aggiunta numeri civici sul edificio,in Italia si mappa come nodo lì dove si trova, cioè ingresso, cancello,...
rempshaener (2025-12-31 14:33:49+00:00): Hallo,
üblicherweise wird ein Umriss um die gesamte Anlage gezogen.
Das bekommt dann
amenity=social_facility
social_facility=shelter
social_facility:for=refugee

Viele Grüße
RandomThighsEnjoyer (2026-01-01 14:05:06+00:00): Danke. Ich habe das so auch gemacht.