piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2023-12-21 09:51:35+00:00): Hi VahagnV, 
these errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
Filip009CZ (2025-06-17 13:00:52+00:00): #mapycom user report #2846039 - "Hlavná rozvodná šachta BVS" - ako by ste to otagoval?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1230095732
Filip009CZ (2025-07-16 09:40:36+00:00): Aké tagovanie navrhujete?
aceman444 (2025-07-17 05:23:03+00:00): Potom mozno pipeline=substation substation=nieco (distribution alebo ina spravna hodnota), substance=water.
Sergey82K (2023-12-20 09:37:51+00:00): Проїзд Дегтярівським шляхопроводом все ще закритий.
zstadler (2024-02-11 15:38:09+00:00): שלום בן,

בטעות, כנראה, שינית את המפה הציבורית והחלפת את השם של עין ארבל לעין ארבל - ארוחת בוקר

לצרכים כאלו אתה מוזמן להכין מסלולים פרטיים, לשמור אותם בענן ולשתף עם חברים כרצונך.

בברכה,
זאב
zstadler (2024-02-15 07:40:12+00:00): Fixed
SekeRob (2023-12-10 14:19:47+00:00): Sorry, there was a long powerline anchored by a node to the ground... removing the offending node made the BBox pretty big.
Steelwing (2023-12-10 14:06:48+00:00): *дорога обваливается, закрыта навсегда
matt_ellery (2024-09-15 20:50:41+00:00): Hi Jarv,
9 months late, but thanks for doing this. It was on my to do list for ages but I could never get enough motivation to start.
All the best,
Matt
◪ Jarv (2024-09-16 18:35:50+00:00): No worries Matt. I think some parts of Horsham are still slightly off, but most of it should be aligned now
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-12-10 21:03:26+00:00): Please do not invent names. Tag only real names.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-12-10 21:10:54+00:00): ... and caravan_site:type=beach is absolute wrong for this site. There is no beach. :-(
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-12-11 00:18:07+00:00): I do not invent names. It is a name used by Lüneburger Heide GmbH and many others. Sources given.

It is associated with Strandbad Dorfmark which do have a beach: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/720186763

See https://www.strandbad-dorfmark.de/
arjunaraoc (2023-12-29 04:52:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
Try to make building orthogonal i.e with 90 degree corners.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144966472
Sandal man (2023-12-11 13:45:31+00:00): Hola, gracias por los ajustes en OSM, pero intenta ajustar objetos en lugar de borrar el antiguo y dibujar uno nuevo.
De esta manera la historia no se pierde.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mantener_el_historial
JezCrow (2023-12-12 19:40:43+00:00): Hi welshman65,
Is Cimla Road definitely 20mph now? There was a TRO for a 30mph limit agreed in January 2023, but has this been overturned since?
https://democracy.npt.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=500&MId=10754&Ver=4
eggie (2023-12-10 17:09:47+00:00): Dag de concurrentie..

Waarom motor_vehicle=designated en bicycle=no
Dat is onwaarschijnlijk.
Wat voor een bord staat er dan vooraan?
Bedoel je wellicht destination ipv designated?
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2023-12-10 17:20:55+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast naar destination (uitgezonderd bewoners) ipv designated.  Dat zou betekenen dat dit weggetje speciaal voor motorvoertuigen is bestemd. 
Je kunt gerust reageren op deze changeset. 

MVG
eggie
richlv (2023-12-11 00:51:46+00:00): Sveiki, ar šo izmaiņu kopu pievienots šis ceļš: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1230108345 .

Ja tur ir kāds ceļš, to vajadzētu savienot ar citiem ceļiem, lai pareizi strādātu maršrutēšana.
Vēl būtu labi saprast, kas tas ir par ceļu. Varbūt tā ir taciņa, vai speciāli izveidots gājēju ceļš (piem., asfaltēts vai bruģēts)?
mcliquid (2023-12-10 16:36:18+00:00): Hi, the bank is now duplicated. It was already here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/810366439
Schenkelhals0815 (2023-12-10 17:00:44+00:00): Hi!
It was not shown as Bank on my card. I'll delete it
gscholz (2023-12-13 08:26:42+00:00): Hi Juan bb,
as all the warnings in this changeset indicate, this edit has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-86.88477&lat=20.54819&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144968618

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
YomanNH (2023-12-14 11:59:22+00:00): Ta droga https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1230110557 na pewno istnieje? Z notatki https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4019662 i z umieszczonego w niej zdjęcia wynika coś innego.

A jeśli jednak istnieje, to nie powinno to być oznaczone jako highway=living_street? Jest tam znak końca strefy zamieszkania? Na pewno nie powinno tam być tagu service=parking_aisle, bo nie jest to żadna alejka parkingowa.
bzzzkrk (2023-12-14 12:11:27+00:00): Szczerze przyznam że nie miałem lepszego pomysłu jak tę drogę opisać. To jest taka nawrotka bo niby nie ma tam żadnego znaku, ale ta duża owalna droga teoretycznie jest jednokierunkowa i jak ktoś chce wyjechać z bloków po prawej stronie to z wyjazdu z parkingu musi skręcić w prawo i objechać cały ten owal, a ta zaznaczona droga ma umożliwić wcześniejsze "zawrócenie". Oczywiście mówię tu o sytuacji gdy lewa strona owalu zostanie dokończona, ale jednak taka nawrotka tam się znajduje
YomanNH (2023-12-14 12:19:24+00:00): To jeśli ta droga https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1151534154 rzeczywiście jest strefą zamieszkania (czyli są postawione znaki D-40), to ta nawrotka również powinna być zmapowana w ten sposób. Jeśli znaków D-40 nie ma, to oznaczenie jako living_street jest błędne.

Co to jest droga "teoretycznie jednokierunkowa"? Jeśli są odpowiednie znaki, to dobrze byłoby dodać tag oneway=yes.
ma-rt-in (2024-02-25 19:34:12+00:00): Hallo,

Warum genau hast du historische Daten erfasst, welche in der Realität bereits überbaut worden sind?
Tomas Straupis (2023-12-11 08:22:55+00:00): Nekeisk dar tvenkinių žymėjimo. Man reikia fone padaryti tarpinį duomenų sluoksnį, kad vėliau nereikėtų kentėti nuo šitų nesąmoningų žymėjimo pakeitimų. Nes dabar jei pakeiti - visi mūsų produktai nukrenta :-(
DaanLT (2023-12-11 09:01:57+00:00): Čia jau pats josm siūlo tokius defaultu, tai jų bus tik daugiau jei ir nekeisiu pats. Čia reiktu mail listu parašyti, kad daugiau pamatytu
Tomas Straupis (2023-12-11 09:17:05+00:00): Taip, Aurimas jau prieš mėnesį rodė, nes test versijoje atsirado. Bet pakeitimas ne per 5 min padaromas, todėl man reikia daugiau laiko.
mcliquid (2023-12-10 16:32:27+00:00): Hi, why did you delete the building-Tag here?
And this is definitly no sample collection. you better study the wiki before :)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:healthcare=sample_collection
Schenkelhals0815 (2023-12-10 16:47:33+00:00): Hi,
thank you for the link - thought it was a hazardous waste station. I have read "Problemstoff". I will study the wiki at first.
George Sears (2023-12-10 20:04:47+00:00): Per sbaglio ho unito i due changeset in uno solo
l'altro era riguardo la correzione di errori rilevati da Osmose e correzione nomi secondo convenzioni Wiki
mcliquid (2023-12-10 16:42:08+00:00): Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
goedegazelle (2023-12-11 06:48:53+00:00): The new tag is not better than the old tag. Please don't make such large scale edits on POI's that you have probably never observed. The wiki strongly discourages blind edits.
totera (2023-12-11 00:11:04+00:00): Ciao Epus Naples, qual è la motivazione che ti ha portato a fare queste modifiche?
totera (2024-01-01 23:45:28+00:00): Provo a spiegare che cosa c'è che non va. I valori del tag highway servono a descrivere una gerarchia della rete stradale; come in molti altri casi in Openstreetmap ci possono essere diverse opinioni in merito ma la situazione precedente alle tue modifiche era molto più sensata di ciò che hai fatto: hai declassato quelli che oggettivamente sono assi principali della rete provinciale come la Valtesino e la Mezzina da secondary a tertiary e la SS78 recentemente rientrata all'ANAS addirittura da primary a tertiary e ciò è già scorretto, ma aver contemporaneamente promosso a secondary strade minori come quelle di Castel di Croce o Capodipiano porta la classificazione dopo le tue modifiche a non avere proprio attinenza con la realtà (ad es. l'asse principale che attraversa Roccafluvione risulta quello Montegallo-Venarotta anziché quello Amandola-Salaria!).
Rinnovo quindi l'invito a spiegare le tue motivazioni, grazie.
totera (2024-01-08 23:59:09+00:00): Non essendoci stata alcuna risposta ho ripristinato la situazione precedente con https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146046747
gscholz (2024-01-10 07:59:46+00:00): Hi totera,
there is still an overlapping section left:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=13.30873&lat=42.77123&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

Kind regards
Guido
totera (2024-01-10 23:25:58+00:00): Hi Guido,
fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146122312
eggie (2023-12-10 17:14:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Lijkt me oke zo. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
FixH (2024-06-04 13:48:27+00:00): Warum "railway=disused"? Zellwaldbahn ist bisher nicht stillgelegt.
wermak (2024-06-04 14:27:42+00:00): Railway=disused wurde eingetragen von Sandmann4u, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/961262075/history.
Filip009CZ (2025-10-07 17:51:43+00:00): Zdravím, kvôli čomu táto relácia https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16807243?
mapperue (2025-10-07 19:58:07+00:00): Ahoj, bola tam značka zákaz vjazdu pre všetky vozidlá v oboch smeroch, ale je tam len jedna značka.
Je to cesta 3. triedy, ale je to skôr poľná cesta, na niektorých úsekoch zúžená.
Do relácie som teraz doplnil ešte výnimku foot a agricultural, na ktoré som vtedy zabudol.
Emilius123 (2023-12-10 16:02:48+00:00): alternativer Title: Alzeyer Straße GAMING
Bvonter23 (2023-12-10 20:55:36+00:00): I made a bridge project to connect Cat Hai with Phu Long - Cat Ba.
Hoàng Tuấn Việt (2023-12-12 13:45:45+00:00): stop adding this? can you act and thinking like a normal human-being please? why you keep adding this????????????? wtf???????
Hoàng Tuấn Việt (2023-12-12 13:46:43+00:00): i said your edits is nonsense and unreal, and it violates the editing rules on the platform?
Bvonter23 (2023-12-13 23:22:31+00:00): No Hoang Tuan Viet. I'm the human. This is a real project because i just correct all grammers in the description and note boxes. And also because i want to connect Cat Hai with Phu Long - Cat Ba without taking the Cat Ba Cable Car sure.
Bvonter23 (2023-12-15 00:23:43+00:00): I also made a second video of Cat Hai - Cat Ba Bridge project in Youtube, and set it as public. You should look it, watch, and discuss Hoang Tuan Viet.
Sanniu (2025-12-23 13:59:50+00:00): Hi, can you add also a street names with addresses to make it available to search?
silversurfer83 (2023-12-12 16:27:10+00:00): Moin :)

warum hast du denn hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/652250927 die parking tags entfernt?

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144969952
Cowboy79 (2023-12-14 18:49:00+00:00): Tags deprecated.
silversurfer83 (2023-12-14 21:15:31+00:00): Und deshalb entfernst du einfach komplett die Information wie hier geparkt werden darf?
Wenn du deprecated tags entfernst sollte doch die Information in Form anderer Tags ersetzt werden. Nur weil ein Tag deprecated ist, muss er doch nicht ersatzlos entfernt werden, oder?
Cowboy79 (2023-12-16 10:50:10+00:00): 1.: Ja, ich habe was entfernt, was falsch war. Ich würde behaupten, dass ich damit nicht der einzige bin und dass das Sinn macht.
2.: Ja, man hätte als Ersatz das korrekte Tagging hinzufügen können, hab ich aber nicht. Es wär mir neu, dazu verpflichtet zu sein. Entweder hatte ich keine Zeit oder Lust.
3.: Es steht dir frei, hier und auf dem Rest der Karte Billiarden fehlende Tags hinzuzufügen (auch ohne Diskussionen zu starten).
4.: Ich weiß nicht, ob ich das schonmal geschrieben habe, aber ich sag dir gerne nochmal, dass ich es echt schade finde, dass du deine Zeit damit verplemperst, hier meine (und wahrscheinlich anderer Leute) Fehler zu suchen, statt selber einfach zu kartieren oder meinetwegen die Fehler anderer einfach zu korrigieren, wenn du dir sicher bist, dass es sich um einen Fehler handelt. Hier zum Beispiel war ein paar Meter weiter ein Garagenhof, aus dem jemand ein einzelnes Gebäude gemacht hatte. Das zu korrigieren wäre um einiges sinnvoller gewesen als deine und meine Schreiberei hier jetzt.
Du wirst mit Sicherheit mal einen Fehler von mir finden, ich bin auch nur ein Mensch und ich bin durchaus daran interessiert, daraus zu lernen, aber für sowas hier ist mir meine Zeit echt zu schade.
VictorIE (2023-12-13 09:32:53+00:00): Hi,

Overlapping buildings here: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1230119274
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1230119275
JohnBradshaw (2023-12-13 10:59:07+00:00): Hi, thanks for the spot. Fixed.
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-06 10:57:26+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping and changeset comment is good. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144970084
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-10 16:30:45+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11407663102
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11407663152

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Peer van Daalen (2024-04-16 06:29:48+00:00): Good morning  wwwouaiebe

This area is registered as "landuse = construction". Why?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1230121945#map=19/50.62740/5.57233&layers=N

Is there still construction going on here? If so, what is still being built here?

Could you please briefly explain what else is happening here and whether there is any up-to-date information on the activities here.

Thank you and greetings from Aix-la Chapelle.

Peer
wwwouaiebe (2024-04-16 12:50:47+00:00): Peer,
There the construction is not finished. They are always busy with the tram platform  and a fountain (if I understand correctly what I see) betwwen the platform and the tower. I think that will not be finished before one month.
Peer van Daalen (2024-04-16 13:14:30+00:00): Merci pour l'information et salutations | Peer
bxl-forever_repair (2023-12-10 20:17:43+00:00): Hello,

Your edit has been reverted.  The address is already registered on the building, all third-party apps that feed on OSM data are expected to assume the shop has the same address.  This is why most shops do not need address tags.
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-06 09:03:55+00:00): Great Job. The mapping is good with changeset comment. But clarification for the mass deletion would be very helpful as well. Happy mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144970594
MxxCon (2023-12-11 15:20:52+00:00): Hello.
You are most welcome to *accurately* map various features, but please don't use OSM hashtags to promote whatever slogans you use. This is not the purpose of hashtags here. The way you use them could be considered spam.
FrontRangeUrbanEquestrians (2023-12-11 15:45:10+00:00): Correcting hashtags momentarily.
FrontRangeUrbanEquestrians (2023-12-11 15:52:50+00:00): Having issues figuring out how to delete hashtags - will address tonight when I'm on my laptop.
MxxCon (2023-12-11 15:55:34+00:00): You can't remove hashtags from existing changesets
FrontRangeUrbanEquestrians (2023-12-11 16:01:43+00:00): Will the changeset/this account get deleted?
MxxCon (2023-12-11 16:34:12+00:00): Account won't be deleted unless you continue to misuse features of OSM. Changeset won't be deleted since you, hopefully, just made an honest mistake and not intentionally spam/vandalizing the map.
However, looking at closer at your changes here and in the 2 following edits there are a number of issues that have to be addressed.

You added a meeting spot. Generally these kind of virtual features are not mapped since it's almost impossible to verify this on the ground by somebody not part of this riding group. If there's some sign or a marker, then by all means map that. But just an agreed location among some people is not a map-able feature.

Additionally, you added "Griffin's Route to Van Bibber Park" as a bridleway. This doesn't seem correct.
For one, you added part of it on top of West 50th Avenue. That is incorrect. It's not like this is a double-decker road.
Then you mapped this bridleway running parallel and sometimes overlapping and intersecting Eldridge Street. This also doesn't seem correct since looking at all the available satellite imagery and Bing Streetside imagery, I'm not seeing any distinct bridleways. Please see this article which documents what is considered a bridleway and how to map them https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbridleway
So unless this feature is brand new and not yet visible on any satellite imagery, it should not be mapped like that. Rather, what you probably want to do is update relevant sections of W 50th Ave and Eldridge Street to have correct access permissions for horse riding with "horse=yes" tags, and perhaps map this "Griffin's Route to Van Bibber Park" as an OSM horse route relation as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhorse (however, osm route relations are a somewhat advanced topic with a lot of nuance, so I'd suggest you get more familiar with OSM before attempting to add that.)
Please correct me on any misunderstanding here.
FrontRangeUrbanEquestrians (2023-12-11 17:02:01+00:00): I think there's a disconnect here - we are mapping presently used riding routes on public roads that have inadequate infrastructure for horses so that infrastructure can be added. These routes are in use by equestrians despite the absence of sidewalks and other safety infrastructure. The purpose of collecting this data in one place is to illustrate the need for better infrastructure along these routes. If you have a more appropriate app to suggest for this purpose I would be glad to use that instead.
MxxCon (2023-12-11 17:21:47+00:00): Perhaps contact your elected officials or DoT or whoever else there might have the authority/power to construct such infrastructure and ask them what's the best way to relay the lack of, and the need for this infrastructure to them.

I'm not familiar with the equestrian topic and what kind of apps are out there that would be more suitable for this.

Nonetheless, OSM must NOT be used to map features which do not exist and you want constructed. OSM is a map of the world NOW, not in the future or in the past.

Mapping the presently used riding routes is perfectly fine, but they must be mapped correctly. Adding a bridleway on top of an existing road or on top of sidewalks is not a correct way of doing that.
FrontRangeUrbanEquestrians (2023-12-11 17:43:15+00:00): On reconsideration I don't think this hostile and opaque community project is the helpful resource it was made out to be. Please delete this account and my contributions.
MxxCon (2023-12-11 17:50:50+00:00): I don't know why you think there's hostility. Your edit contained mistakes which I pointed out to you.

Also don't know what opaqueness you are referring to when everything I pointed out to you is documented on the publicly accessible documentation site https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/
Mapping the real world is a complicated topic. A map needs to be able to account for all the different things one might encounter out there and as such it has a bit of nuance to it. But that's not the same thing as opaque.
FrontRangeUrbanEquestrians (2023-12-11 18:02:28+00:00): Perhaps consider informing new users that there is a substantial amount of required reading behind the misleading tutorial that invites users to start mapping. I think our time is far better spent on a mapping solution that isn't equivalent to joining a TTRPG run by accountants.
MxxCon (2023-12-11 18:08:19+00:00): I have been professional and cordial to you and I expect the same from you without uncalled for name calling!
Good luck with finding those more suitable mapping solutions.

If you want to delete your account, https://www.openstreetmap.org/account/deletion
citrula (2023-12-11 21:37:01+00:00): Hi FrontRangeUrbanEquestrians, there certainly is a lot of reading required to be able to understand everything that is going on - this is the nature of a collaborative project of this scale. I do agree with MxxCon that this sort of mapping is probably not fit for OSM proper, but there are tools based on OSM like uMap ( https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ ) which allow you to make layers for personal use that don't meet the "on the ground principle" described above. However, mapping the presence (or absence) of sidewalks and designated horse features is a great way to contribute towards your goal, I think.
FrontRangeUrbanEquestrians (2023-12-11 22:05:26+00:00): Thank you citrula for the very useful comment. I think we will stick with paper given the complexity of online mapping and the vivacious community attached to that pastime, but I will propose that tool (and my takeaways from this conversation) to the group
canfe (2023-12-10 18:34:48+00:00): Ma il percorso esiste veramente?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144971123
cicciobisticcio (2023-12-10 19:00:20+00:00): Si, certamente sia per la Mountain Bike che per il trekking. Non capisco perchè il percorso è visibile in base allo zoom che viene operato
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144971123
canfe (2023-12-11 06:15:04+00:00): Se usi ID le mappe che renderizzano i dati che mappi ci mettono 3-4 giorni per essere a posto.
Alcuni livelli di zoom si vedono prima altri dopo.
Se però vai in editing la modifica è istantanea.
Sull'app OSMAND invece vengono aggiornate tutti i primi del mese (circa). Con la versione plus ogni ora invece.
conradoos (2023-12-10 21:14:07+00:00): Droga nie ma nazwy "Pętla Arciechów". Fikcyjna zmiana.
dadavid (2023-12-11 12:16:44+00:00): Hi kjon, 

willkommen bei OSM und danke, dass du die Position direkt korrigiert hast, super :) 

Grüße und weiterhin viel Spass beim mappen!

David
dadavid (2023-12-11 12:17:34+00:00): ups, falschen user gegriffen :D trotzdem danke fürs korrigieren :D
conradoos (2023-12-10 20:48:09+00:00): Znowu wprowadzasz fikcyjne zmiany.
mcliquid (2023-12-11 07:37:24+00:00): Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!