piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DD1GJ (2024-04-05 06:14:57+00:00): Hallo Elo4Future, 

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Ich habe diesen Änderungssatz komplett zurückgesetzt, da er jede Menge Fehler enthielt (siehe obige Meldungen). Ein Straßenbahnübergang war total verschoben. Zudem hattest Du die gesperrte Straßenstücke über bereits vorhandene Straßen gezeichnet, so dass unzählige doppelte Wege vorhanden waren. 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=149597685

Grundsätzlich sind Absperrungen wie Poller oder Steinblöcke immer punktförmig. Wenn man an einer Stelle mit dem Auto/Motorrad nicht durchkommt, dann wird das entsprechende Wegstück mit motor_vehicle=no gekennzeichnet. Evtl muss dafür das Straßenstück aufgetrennt werden. Weitere Informationen findest Du im Tutorial: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim
DD1GJ (2024-04-05 06:27:09+00:00): Nachtrag: Ich habe auch alle Deine vorherigen Änderungen rückgängig gemacht, da sie technisch völlig falsch waren. Straßensperrungen solllten nur in OSM eingetragen werden, wenn sie mindestens ein halbes Jahr dauern.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=149598387
Norbert Dichter (2024-04-05 14:09:40+00:00): added more, but did not square prior mappers work

@nriceusa

Maybe you missed from the instructions:
After drawing the outline and tagging as a building, use the 'Q' key in the iD web editor to "square" the corners.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149590738
jeslop (2024-04-06 14:29:51+00:00): Hola lejandromontes. La descripción de una característica no corresponde con su nombre: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Nombre_es_solo_el_nombre

Gracias por tus contribuciones.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
MxxCon (2024-04-05 05:11:15+00:00): Hello.
You added "maxspeed=20 mph" to 2 nodes belonging to stairs. What exactly were you trying to do here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149591459
Coplact (2024-04-05 13:23:07+00:00): Hello, probably overlooked on the tag for the stair. Wanted to add sidewalk and attach stairs to sidewalk (original node was stair-street since no side walk had been added). An also reorient stair to be parallel to street since this setup is closer to the actual orientation of the stairs in that station. Is it best practice to link stairs to street or sidewalk(in such scenario)? Just started contributing on OSM, beginner mistakes.
MxxCon (2024-04-05 15:19:19+00:00): If sidewalks are mapped as separate ways like here, then other pedestrian features should be connected to sidewalks.
If sidewalks are mapped as tags on the roads themselves, then the pedestrian features should be connected to the road.
If you have any other questions, feel free to ask. 👍
MxxCon (2024-04-05 05:14:06+00:00): Hello.
When mapping sidewalks, it's generally best not to map them as a single loop around the whole block, but rather as 4 sidewalk paths. Mapping it like that allows us to independently tag each sidewalk based on their parameters, such as surface, if it's lit or not, its width, etc.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149591505
Coplact (2024-04-05 13:27:21+00:00): Hello, thanks for the tip. I have a few mistakes as a beginner and also forgot to send changes with review checkbox on. I will disconnect these to make them all individual sidewalk lines. Thanks for the feedback, much appreciated!
MxxCon (2024-04-05 15:21:57+00:00): The way you mapped this is not outright wrong, just not the optimal way.
The review checkbox is a helpful flag, but I tend to review all changesets regardless if it's marked or not. 😅
Norbert Dichter (2024-04-05 14:03:54+00:00): added more, but did not fix unsquared buildings mapped by @[abraun6] . Maybe you like to come back and look for yourself 

"After drawing the outline and tagging as a building, use the 'Q' key in the iD web editor to "square" the corners."
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149591541
matheusgomesms (2024-04-05 17:29:33+00:00): Hi there!

Is there any recent imagery pointing that? Street imagery from Apr 2023 shows that this left turn is possible.

Also, the relation is wrongly constructed (the Rua Isac Amaral should have been splitted at Rua Joaquim Nabuco), but let's confirm first if this restriction is new.

Thanks!
Matheus
matheusgomesms (2024-04-05 17:30:50+00:00): split*
NittyGrittyInTheCity (2024-04-08 22:25:23+00:00): Hello Matheus, thanks for reaching out! According to images provided by a Maps User, there is a new left turn restriction here. I have updated the turn restriction to function properly by splitting Rua Isac Amaral at node 616541926. Thank you for catching this and your assistance. Happy mapping!
matheusgomesms (2024-04-10 00:20:33+00:00): Thanks for the quick return! The second part (eastern) of Rua Isac Amaral was still with an incomplete relation, so I deleted it. Looks good now, I think.

Happy mapping too!
NittyGrittyInTheCity (2024-04-11 17:27:41+00:00): Thank you for catching that! Happy Mapping!
Norbert Dichter (2024-04-05 14:03:24+00:00): added more, but did not fix unsquared buildings mapped by @[abraun6] . Maybe you like to come back and look for yourself 

"After drawing the outline and tagging as a building, use the 'Q' key in the iD web editor to "square" the corners."
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149592143
Frans S (2024-05-04 13:24:40+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
inaccurate mapped.

Buildings not squared.

Buildings need to be tagged as building=yes


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149592240
matarranyacorrector (2024-04-05 00:08:01+00:00): Hola peyeh,

Estás eliminando información válida de idioma. No hay ningún motivo para elimina las etiquetas name:ca=*. ¿Cuál es el motivo por el que las eliminas?
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-05 01:19:28+00:00): This is not how you map driveways...  I have contacted the DWG regarding these changesets and problematic mapping.
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-05 01:23:38+00:00): Do not map pools as buildings...
Timmy_Tesseract (2024-04-13 11:30:51+00:00): Hello. What is your source for the names added in this changeset? In case of the existing place node you changed the name from Oro to Luhuran. This seems a bit weird as Dapitan does not have a barangay with that name and the nearby schools indicate that Oro is the correct place name.
Janecarlosaguilar (2024-04-29 21:07:38+00:00): Yeah I saw it
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-05 01:17:58+00:00): Do not use skinny lines and close points to try and connect two points, multipolygon relations should be used instead.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149592555
MxxCon (2024-04-05 05:19:53+00:00): Hello.
Please remember that when you are mapping for this project 149, by default it hides all the buildings layer, so you do not see the complete OSM data. This building that you added already exists as way 247445606.
You can press "F" to open map data panel and there re-enable buildings layer to see everything.

I went ahead and deleted your duplicate. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149592822
kengaroo5445 (2024-04-20 01:57:44+00:00): Thanks for the info
MxxCon (2024-04-05 05:33:44+00:00): Hello.
Please submit your changes grouped into smaller geographic regions. There's no reason for the same changeset to contain changes from Canada and Dubai.
In OSM multiple values are separated by ; not -. So if you want to list grades K-12, you have to explicitly list each one separated by ; Otherwise, it's recorded exactly as "K-12".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149592826
ThatOneFilipinoExtremeist (2024-04-06 02:53:38+00:00): got it, will try not to do this again. thanks
LordGarySugar (2024-04-05 00:51:32+00:00): Reverted 149588696 excluding intended additions of gardens and geometry changes
Warin61 (2024-04-05 12:29:44+00:00): Hi,

Most buildings are 'square' their corners from right angles. 
Some of your mapped building have very strange shapes - please take more care with your mapping. Do you have a task co ordinator? If so seek their assistance.
torchlight7 (2024-04-05 00:57:47+00:00): Goodbye "Eli Brachie Happy Home"
MxxCon (2024-04-05 05:44:24+00:00): Did you get a chance to flag DWG to that account?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149593119
Khidistavi (2024-04-15 17:14:41+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150049841
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-29 22:52:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150683754, 150683768 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by user who did not reply to any changeset comments
Khidistavi (2024-04-15 17:14:49+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150049841
Khidistavi (2024-04-15 17:14:57+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150049841
MxxCon (2024-04-05 05:52:02+00:00): Shouldn't these huge stadium/sports flood lights be tagged as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tower:type%3Dlighting ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149593918
literan (2024-04-05 17:08:49+00:00): рекламных фраз не надо
pitscheplatsch (2024-04-06 12:21:57+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149652949
RedGreenBlue09 (2024-04-05 17:03:43+00:00): The document noted seems to be inconsistent when compared to the zoning map here: https://quyhoachquocgia.mpi.gov.vn/Pages/tinvb.aspx?idTin=498
RedGreenBlue09 (2024-04-05 17:04:12+00:00): I'll not make any further changes until this is clear.
RedGreenBlue09 (2024-04-05 17:06:54+00:00): It is my bad not including this link in the original changeset though.
Tommybara (2024-04-05 17:16:07+00:00): Very simple rule:
If a road is part of a National Route system (quốc lộ), then the Ministry of Transportation (Bộ Giao thông vận tải) is responsible for managing it, so any road upgrade will be done by the ministry. If it is a local road then either the People Committee (Ủy ban nhân dân) or Department of Transportation (Sở GTVT tỉnh) is responsible for its update.

In 2011-2015, the Ministry has upgraded the whole route of Dầu Giây to Dalat (including the Prenn Pass), but the recent upgrade in 2023 was done by the government of Lâm Đồng province. Isn't that clear?
RedGreenBlue09 (2024-04-05 17:18:24+00:00): I'm not talking about the upgrade to 4 lanes. I'm referencing the zoning map. Yes, the map is from the Ministry of Transportation. Please take a look at it here https://quyhoach.xaydung.gov.vn/vn/quy-hoach/7975/quy-hoach-vung-tinh-lam-dong.aspx
Tommybara (2024-04-05 17:22:10+00:00): And when is the date of that Decree 1555/QĐ-TTg? It's 28/6/2016, which is before the date of the Decree 4155/QĐ-BGTVT (26/12/2016). Also, these maps are from the Ministry of Construction (Bộ Xây dựng).
Tommybara (2024-04-05 17:25:02+00:00): It's completely normal for some maps to be outdated. The Decree 4155/QĐ-BGTVT has been proved to exist, and actually took effect therefore we should base on that.
RedGreenBlue09 (2024-04-05 17:26:32+00:00): Alright, seems like the document you referred is the most reliable one yet. Thanks.
tastrax (2024-04-08 09:20:23+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
empty_child (2024-04-05 09:40:32+00:00): Hello
Technically, it's not Alania. This naming mostly about the region of Russia - Northern Ossetia - Alania.
Largesurfacearea (2024-04-07 05:49:41+00:00): Hello.
Republic of South Ossetia changed name "Republic of South Ossetia
State of Alania" at 2017. To translate it 「南オセチア共和国・アラニア国」.
Watch this PDF file to translate.

https://www.ge.emb-japan.go.jp/files/weekly%20reports%202017/weekly_report%2014.pdf
Kovoschiz (2024-04-05 08:41:55+00:00): Please don't delete then recreate basically the same thing. This has no difference.
user_17222985 (2024-04-05 10:37:14+00:00): СКАСОВАНА БО ПЕРЕПЛУТАНІ ВУЛИЦІ
Greg91 (2025-01-27 11:28:38+00:00): This street name is not real: small griefing / self-advertising

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161814330
Glassman (2024-04-07 17:49:54+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149597865
Liqid1010 (2025-08-03 19:49:21+00:00): Prosím nepridávať na nástupištia MHD "name", pretože sa nejedná o nazov nastupištia ale zastávky, teda je to nesprávny a duplicitný údaj, ktorý navyše zavadzia na mapách.
mapperue (2025-08-04 06:18:39+00:00): Ahoj,
názov sa u nástupišť električky, vlaku, metra a pod. používa v Európe bežne. Skôr by som sa pozrel na to, prečo je tam mapovaná duplicitná zastávka ako bod. Keďže značka railway=platform sa používa len na cestách a plochách.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-04-05 06:54:09+00:00): Hi Ngann, Please do me a favor if you edit "Hẻm" please tag with Highway = Service (Service = Alley) for better OSM Data. 
Thank you for your contribution.
permutation (2024-04-08 17:35:58+00:00): Är det värt att måla berggrund här? Hela området är hällemarkstallskog och att rita just de fläckar som ser bergiga ut på flygfotot är inte representativt för hur platsen ser ut.
aleno150 (2024-04-08 18:07:47+00:00): Nja, håller med att just detta är petiga bidrag från min sida. Jag har själv varit en gång i tiden guide på scouternas trapperspår och jodå det är öppna klippor i skogen även i verkligheten. Sedan om någon får nytta av detta, kanske inte, kanske mer terapi för min egen del att minnas platser. Å andra sidan är spåret det mest populära på hela Vässarö och någon kanske lägger till ännu mer detaljer, vem vet?
aleno150 (2024-04-08 18:23:40+00:00): Men om du vill och tycker det är mer representativt för platsen får du för min del ta bort relationen mellan klippor och skog.
Dawid2849 (2024-04-05 07:38:00+00:00): Nie ten link w source

https://bilgoraj.com.pl/pl/11_wiadomosci/41721_marcin-adam-mura-odtrabil-sukces.html
YPGGUUY (2024-04-28 16:17:58+00:00): 您好, 依照[维基的说明](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative), 行政边界不应与道路粘连, 或直接将道路用作行政边界关系的组成部分.
非常感谢您绘画永安镇的道路. 我期待您能补完这一部分, 公交线路标注有赖您的成果.
CJJ2501 (2024-04-10 08:16:28+00:00): Hi Matthias, Chris here.
Just checking, is this really a park? Or more like church grounds that include some grassy areas?
Maybe landuse=grass would be a better fit here.
Let me know what you think
Cheers
Matthias Wiesmann (2024-04-10 08:22:37+00:00): The web site from the church describes it as park-like:

"Die Kirche liegt auf einer kleinen Hügelkuppe inmitten einer Parklandschaft und ist von weither sichtbar."

https://reformiert-zuerich.ch/-4/kirchenkreis-12/unsere-kirchen~1803/kirche-oerlikon/50024/
CJJ2501 (2024-04-10 09:43:42+00:00): Cool, sounds good to me.
Thanks for the quick reply.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-04-05 07:08:37+00:00): 百度百科可能难以被认为是版权相容的来源
或者至少不要明确使用里面的文本，仍然靠自己理解一边来画图比较好

（此外，不妨考虑一下求闻百科？在编辑内容和参与贡献上更自由一些 https://www.qiuwenbaike.cn/wiki/Qiuwen:%E9%A6%96%E9%A1%B5 也是国内备案的合法网站）
tastrax (2024-04-08 09:27:43+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
DD1GJ (2024-04-05 08:56:16+00:00): Wieder gelöscht. Der Hofbauernhof ist bereits als Café, Bäckerei und Hofladen eingetragen, was alles in der Hauptkarte angezeigt wird.  Das sollte eigentlich genügen.

Bei anderen Karten/Apps kann es manchmal Tage oder Wochen dauern, bis sie ihren Datenbestand mit OSM synchronisieren. Die jeweiligen Ersteller entscheiden, was sie in welcher Form anzeigen bzw. nicht.

Weitere Informationen zu OSM findest Du z.B. bei https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Die Öffnungszeiten habe ich korrigiert https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
SomeoneElse (2025-02-15 01:29:06+00:00): I'm not sure what happened here but "remove self intersection of way" seems to have changed the tags on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128205661/history from grass / common to recreation_ground(!).
ToniE (2024-04-06 12:37:14+00:00): Servus,

weißt du zufällig, ob die Haltestellen schilder noch stehen? Sonst würden geo-d und ich bei der nächsten Radltour mal nachschauen.

Gruß
Toni
landini (2024-04-06 13:19:31+00:00): Laufzorner Straße steht noch, die anderen weis ich nicht.
Jrachi (2024-04-06 06:22:50+00:00): Ciao.
Viene spesso confuso il tag:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:amenity%3Dbar
Dove solitamente è più corretto usare:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:amenity%3Dcafe

Inoltre ti faccio notare che il modo più corretto per mappare i numeri civici è di inserire un nodo in corrispondenza con l'ingresso.
Potrebbe essere utile guardare il video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaO2-o8m6nw

Ivo
zstadler (2025-05-08 08:32:24+00:00): Hello yanivzelig,

Thank you for your contributions to OSM!

In this edit you have deleted several paths including paths that have clear OSM traces:
367682058, 1234277959, 1234298083

Some of the traced were uploaded to OSM after this edit deleted the paths.

You have also ignored all changeset comments you have ever received for more than a year and a half.

Please respond to this comment and the other comments shown in this page:

: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2013202

Without your responses, it is possible that your contributions will be reverted.
zstadler (2025-05-08 10:10:35+00:00): Further information:

A few months after this edit, another user added way 1303446953as a replacement for the deleted way 1234277959 way 1234298083.

Then, 3 months ago, in changeset 162577061 user yanivzelig created relation 18713626 and used the replacement way 1303446953 as one of its members, effectively confirming the existence of that path.

As a result of the above, and the existence of recent GPS traces, I have reverted this changeset and the replacement ways that it caused.
GEO ECLA (2024-04-05 09:14:58+00:00): Bravo pour cette 1ère contribution !
Pour les couleurs, voir : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:colour
Corrigé.
buxoroo (2024-04-05 08:29:14+00:00): Сносили
marczoutendijk_repair (2024-04-05 08:54:23+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 149543244, 149543383, 149562609, 149563011, 149563225, 149564077, 149564289, 149568011, 149584205, 149584501, 149584596, 149584654, 149584811, 149584885, 149585006, 149585323.
DD1GJ (2024-04-05 10:02:18+00:00): Teilrevert, verschobener Hydrant.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=149606868
Piz Pachific (2024-04-05 15:04:57+00:00): Hallo wies1. Vielen Dank für deine Bemühungen bei OSM! Eine kleine Bemerkung habe ich gerade zu diesem Changeset noch: du zeichnest die Dächer so ab, wie sie auf dem Luftbild zu sehen sind. Leider ist das SwissTopo Luftbild hier etwas schräg aufgenommen, so dass du dies auch mit einem Dachwinkel abgezeichnet hast. Allerdings denke ich kaum, dass diese Gebäude einen Grundriss mit diesen Winkeln haben, was auch nicht auf dem Luftbild so ersichtlich ist. Dürfte ich dich bitten, zukünftig die Grundrisse zu antizipieren und wenn möglich rechteckig zu machen? (Via 'Q' in JOSM). Vielen Dank und Grüsse Chrigi
wies1 (2024-04-08 08:43:29+00:00): Hallo,
vor allem dann, wenn die Häuser direkt aneinander gereiht sind, habe ich das vielfach deswegen so gemacht, um darzustellen, wo die jeweiligen Hausgrenzen sind, da ich es lieber habe, wenn ich eine Adressierung direkt am Gebäude vornehmen kann. Zwischenzeitlich habe ich mal bei Nicht-OSM-Karten geschaut, wie die eine solche Situation lösen - nämlich so, wie Du es meinst, Grundrisse antizipieren. Daher werde ich dies zukünftig, soweit möglich, auch so machen. Dein Hinweis war gut über diese Thematik in Ruhe nachzudenken.
Viele Grüsse
wies1
Piz Pachific (2024-04-14 11:47:22+00:00): Hallo,
Gegen ein taggen am Hausumriss habe ich nichts, befürworte dies sogar. Ich spreche nur von der Geometrie der Hausteile. Z.B. am Hausteil https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260590944
Der Hausteil hat keine solche Grundfläche, sondern du hast hier das Luftbild der Dachschräge abgezeichnet. Ich beziehe mich nur darauf, dass es da sinnvoller wäre, die Grundfläche zu antizipieren und in den allermeisten Fällen rechteckig zu machen.
wies1 (2024-04-14 14:47:53+00:00): Hallo,
das Beispiel zeigt mir, dass ich Dich richtig verstanden habe.
Viele Grüsse
wies1
george1201 (2024-04-05 20:54:59+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe eine Frage zum Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4312618. Die Änderung von footway nach path finde ich gut. Aber warum foot=designated? Das setzt doch DE:239/240/241 voraus. Die Schilder gibt es hier aber nicht. Oder irre ich mich?
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2024-04-06 06:54:52+00:00): Moin
designated = designiert = dafür vorgesehen, davon gehe ich bei Fußgängen in Grünanlagen prinzipiell davon aus. Verkehrszeichen braucht es dafür m.E. in Grünanlagen nicht, so wie m.E. auch Radwege nach § 2 (4) Satz 3 und 4 für den Radverkehr vorgesehen, aber nicht beschildert sind. Abseits von Grünanlagen kann und sollte man es anders betrachten, ja. 
Aber eigentlich war die Änderung nur ein "Nebenprodukt" eines Nebenprodukts. Nach einem Rückhaltebecen festgestellt, dass Radverkehr dort fröhlich über nicht abgesenkte Bordsteine getaggt war und danach, dass es tw. cycleways waren.
Zwei querende Wege habe ich gelassen, die könnten zumind. abschnittsweise 240er haben.
george1201 (2024-04-06 22:08:34+00:00): N'Abend Ameisenschreck.
Ich habe im Wiki nochmal nachgelesen und erkennen müssen, dass meine Annahme nicht korrekt war: Für foot=designated braucht es nicht notwendigerweise ein Schild. Deine Argumentation mit den Fußgängern in Grünanlagen hat mich überzeugt. Nach deinen Änderungen sind die Wege im Schmallen jetzt einigermaßen konsistent gemappt. Das frühere Mischmasch aus footway und cycleway hatte mich schon seit längerem gestört. Danke für die Klarstellung.
zuicz (2024-05-15 19:42:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1269315274
ta kładka istnieje?
DD1GJ (2024-04-05 09:54:30+00:00): Teilrevert, da wohl unbeabsichtigt Haydranten und ein Straßenstück verschoben wurden, siehe https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=149606200

Bitte besser aufpassen beim Verschieben der Karte und bei Zweifeln die Bearbeitung ohne zu speichern abbrechen!