piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MxxCon (2023-03-29 22:39:25+00:00): Hello.
You mapped The Collective Paper Factory hotel, however I see that there's already mapped The Paper Factory Hotel. Are these features different?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134279575
sen_takeya (2023-04-12 08:45:06+00:00): Hello. Why do you put forest on the forest?
For Example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1158288651
MapSpot (2023-03-29 22:01:02+00:00): Hi SINY_King.

I saw you requested your changeset to be reviewed. Welcome to OSM! Here are two main tips for editing buildings in NYC:

1. Buildings are typically aligned with ESRI imagery, not Bing. This has been the local standard after a big import of buildings in 2013. You can change your imagery source or offset using the Background Settings panel on the right side of the iD editor interface.

2. When adding new buildings, to make all the right-angle corners cleaner, it is recommended to square the feature by pressing Q while the building is selected.
SINY_King (2023-06-03 18:22:19+00:00): Oh ok thank you for letting me know about the maps. I just discovered the feature where you can change the map and I changed it to ESRI and I like it better as it is newer and sharper.
confusedbuffalo (2023-07-08 17:05:35+00:00): Thank you for this, you caught some shops that I hadn't yet added the brand info to since adding them to NSI.

However, also be careful when armchair mapping like this. You merged two ATMs, with no explanation why: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10591505471 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10591505472
There really are two ATMs of different brands next to each other, so it is right that they are mapped individually.
Also, the suggestions aren't always correct, for example FNB ATMs do not need official_name adding to them, as they do not have a name at all. There is an open issue on NSI about fixing this in general so it does not get suggested: https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/issues/7236#issuecomment-1356329538

I've fixed those things here, but maybe check if you've done such a thing in other places and put it back.
rskedgell (2023-03-29 22:41:39+00:00): Really? What's the name of this new museum?
rskedgell (2023-04-05 23:48:45+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134556852
MxxCon (2023-03-29 22:45:20+00:00): Please note that addr:unit tag is intended for..units, suites, apartments, etc. If you want to tag floor number, you can use addr:floor= tag. Please correct his.

You named a feature as "Materials for the Arts (ran by the city)". Is "(ran by the city)" actually part of the name or something you added?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134280962
emersonveenstra (2023-03-30 10:35:04+00:00): Hi,

This is not the correct way to show that it is closed, most routers will ignore noexit tags. You need to use either access=no or highway=construction (if it's being worked on) on the part of the trail that's closed, using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Conditional_restrictions&uselang=en if it's only closed for a short period of time.

If there are physical barriers, then you can also map them as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier.

Hope this helps!
Mecheye (2023-03-30 17:06:50+00:00): Got it, thank you! I went and re-did the closure.
GeorgeKaplan (2026-05-02 09:40:12+00:00): Un opening_hours=closed signifie une fermeture définitive ? Si oui, il faudrait plutôt utiliser le préfixe du cycle de vie.
Famlam (2023-04-07 18:31:45+00:00): Dag Hendrikklaas,
Waarschijnlijk heten deze bomen niet allemaal "Populier" (zoals ik Famlam heet), maar is het de Nederlandse soortnaam en zou het dus species:nl=populier moeten zijn, geen name:nl=populier
Hendrikklaas (2023-04-08 11:17:57+00:00): Bedankt kijkend naar soorten houdt mijn kennis op bij Populus nigra. Verder is het een zwarte bladzijde, er zijn wel 30 sub soorten
Famlam (2023-04-09 07:58:02+00:00): Goed punt. Dan is genus:nl de tag voor populier.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-29 22:50:44+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8091171224

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
imagoiq (2023-04-02 10:07:39+00:00): Hello,
Concernant le terrain (et celui-ci d'à côté), ne s'agirait-il pas plutôt de `inline_hockey` que de `field_hockey` ?
Marc_ch (2023-04-02 15:43:31+00:00): Bonjour,
merci pour la question
je n'ai pas trouvé de page wiki pour sport=inline_hocky mais en regardant taginfo et wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roller_in-line_hockey cela correspond bien mieux
je vais corriger, en parler sur la liste tagging pour être sur que c'est le bon terme anglais britanique et si oui créé la page de documentation
Merci pour cette judicieuse remarque, j'ai du faire l'erreur ailleurs aussi, je vais vérifier.
Salutations,
Marc
Marc_ch (2023-04-03 11:55:45+00:00): sur la liste de diffusion, un participant demande si le terrain est le même pour les rollers quad que pour les rollers inline (il me semble mais je préfère  vous demander votre avis)
si oui je pense qu'il serrait pertinant d'utiliser sport=roller_hockey + roller_hockey=inline
qu'en pense-tu ?
Salutations,
Marc
imagoiq (2023-04-04 06:50:43+00:00): Bonne question, j'avoue que je n'y connais rien. J'ai remarqué qu'il y a pas mal de terrain de ce genre dans la région (Cheyres, Estavayer…), peut-être que cela vaut la peine de contacter un club ?

Donc l'autre variante selon Wikipedia(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roller_hockey et https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roller_hockey_(quad)) serait appelé Rink hockey, Roller hockey, quad hockey. Selon Wikipédia Rink hockey serait l'appellation américaine, mais on trouve l'utilisation de ce nom en Suisse: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rink_hockey_en_Suisse ou http://www.geneve-rhc.ch/ par exemple.

Concernant le terrain, je n'ai pas trouvé d'information. J'ai l'impression que celui-ci est le même entre rink et inline hockey, mais il y a probablement de subtiles différences.

Bref, ce que tu proposes me semble cohérent.
imagoiq (2023-04-04 06:51:54+00:00): Pourrais-tu changer les autres endroits de la région également si l'utilisation de ces tags se confirme ?
marc__marc (2023-04-04 07:09:22+00:00): je vais voir si je trouve un contact dans le club local
je vérifierai aussi les autres terrains que j'ai pu renseigner et ensuite ceux des environs
MxxCon (2023-03-30 04:24:54+00:00): Hello.
These changes seem to be incorrect.
Crosswalks with traffic lights should be tagged as crossing=traffic_signals.
Crosswalks with STOP sign should be tagged as crossing=marked or crossing=uncontrolled.
Is the satellite imagery that shows this is a traffic lights intersection outdated?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134281901
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-29 23:10:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3826279850
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/803780678

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
เบญ (2023-03-29 23:25:45+00:00): ร้านมือถือเล็กๆในโคราช ที่ดูแลลูกค้าดีมาก
💙ซื่อสัตย์ จริงใจ ใส่ใจทุกงาน
💙ดูแลมือถือของท่าน แกะเครื่องถนอมมาก
💙ไม่มีรอยเพิ่มเติม
💜โดยช่างชำนาญงาน ซ่อมไม่ได้ไม่คิดตัง
💜ประเมินราคาซ่อมฟรี งบไม่บานปลาย
ร้านนี้มีแต่ความจริงใจ
ปรึกษางานซ่อมมือถือ ตจว.ส่งฟรี
MxxCon (2023-03-30 04:26:57+00:00): This edit doesn't seem correct.
The small intersecting segments should still be tagged as sidewalks since that's what they are...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134282021
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-29 23:30:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/329732853
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/329732903

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-30 12:10:33+00:00): What are you trying to upload. This changeset is empty.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-08 15:25:03+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2896380138/history has shop = gym that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=gym ? What kind of shop, if any is here?
Is it a gym (in either of its meaning, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gym ) - or is it actuall a shop? If it is a shop - what they are selling there? Gym equipment?
felipeeugenio (2023-03-30 11:33:26+00:00): Hola
Probablemente esté bien que el número de block vaya en el nombre del edificio por que quizás es así como lo llaman.
Pero para efectos de dirección, debe ir también en addr:unit= sin la palabra block. Solo el número.

Yo ya lo hice.
Probablemente tienen un número de dirección asociado también, el cual debe ir en addr:housenumber=

Saludos
opendcc (2023-03-30 04:06:33+00:00): This changeset is spam and was reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134282514
kechan_Rapid (2023-03-30 00:01:22+00:00): Please review this!
SomeoneElse (2023-03-30 00:18:08+00:00): Thanks for reverting!

https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/424314830
https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/1686293227
looks OK
euroPathfinder (2023-03-30 20:51:35+00:00): Did someone already report seeraof to DWG?
SomeoneElse (2023-03-30 21:11:26+00:00): If they did, we've not seen the report yet, but we spotted the change, hence the thanks above.
Cheers,
Andy, from the DWG
andrewsuzuki (2023-04-07 23:41:21+00:00): Hi, a couple of notes:
- this section of the "cycle track" along the divided part of Edgewood Ave really just a lane according to osm definitions since there isn't any physical separation, hence why I had tagged it as a cycleway:left=lane previously, not a separate highway=cycleway.
- you accidentally connected a node to the road under the bridge
- the bridge section should be connected to the man_made=bridge outline
- the thing where you're adding access=no and whitelisting specific types of transport is unconventional/wrong. Particularly I noticed on way 39414553 that you added access=no and motor_vehicle=yes but this doesn't include other types of transport that can legally use it. For example, bicycles (bicycles aren't legally required to use the lane/track). Just follow the example of other roads and omit access tags unless they are different from the default access restrictions. I noticed you did the same on MLK as well.
delonix (2023-04-10 16:25:25+00:00): Hey!  Thanks for the suggestions and hints!  I know, a lot of the attributes regarding what's allowed (yes/no) vs. designated can be very confusing.   Edgewood at times is above road grade; at others it's on the same level. Since it's separated from traffic by the little "sticks", I thought to add it as a separate feature.
hatul (2023-05-24 12:05:25+00:00): שלום, מה המקור לגבולות השמורה?
moishylevy0 (2023-05-25 06:09:00+00:00): לא מדוייק העתקתי ידנית מעמוד ענן
hatul (2023-05-25 06:44:34+00:00): תודה על הרצון לתרום. אבל אי אפשר להעתיק מעמוד ענן. 
א. המידע שם מוגן בזכויות יוצרים.
ב. המידע שם לא מדויק. במקרה הזה גבולות השמורה המוכרזת הם הרבה יותר מצומצמים, אפשר להשוות לגובמאפ ולראות.

הוספנו עכשיו את השמורה לפי הגבולות הנכונים ממקור פתוח.
moishylevy0 (2023-05-25 06:50:59+00:00): תודה
סליחה
EvanSiroky (2023-04-05 22:23:17+00:00): Hello, I'm a mapper that frequents the Wenatchee area. It looks like you have requested a review, so I'm giving this a review!

I actually was the first to create the construction area for this subdivision back in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91266260), so it's cool to see others improve the area. 

The buildings you have created all look great!

If you wanted to, you could improve on this by adding additional information about the buildings like the address of each house. Also, the latest satellite imagery seems to show that nearly all of this area is no longer under construction. Therefore, the construction area could be converted into a residential area.
WoodWoseWulf (2023-06-04 08:23:04+00:00): Hi David,

I have restored the tag amenity=university to this campus after you changed it to amenity=school.

Amenity=school should be used for institutions that typically teach students around the ages of 6-18.
SomeoneElse (2023-04-16 10:37:54+00:00): Hello,
It looks like you're "fixing" a minor issue with a broken import here - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tagless-points-and-lines-in-greenbelt-md/97992 .
When you detect stuff like this (a way without tags not part of any relations) it's probably worth flagging it up somewhere rather than editing it further).  Your change here will make the DWG's eventual revert harder.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
b-jazz (2023-04-18 19:11:11+00:00): While I commiserate with the dilemma of reverting objects that have been further changed, I just don't know how your request can reasonably honored. How exactly am I suppose to know about every possible data error that I shouldn't be making "minor" fixes to? Is there a list somewhere? Your request is chilling and makes me think I should never make another edit to the map lest it might make a future revert difficult.
catdreamer (2023-04-02 03:12:30+00:00): 已拆除或消失的項目，請參閱

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_decay
emersonveenstra (2023-03-31 11:05:29+00:00): Hi,

When adding house numbers, you should only put the number in that field, not anything else. Could you please fix https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1158317569? Thanks!
tguen (2023-04-05 22:08:50+00:00): Do you have a source for this being storage rental? I never surveyed the site, but I was under the impression that this is actually just garages for the houseboats across the street.
jmarchon (2023-04-06 06:01:43+00:00): I do not, no. In hindsight, I'm not sure why I changed the tag. Feel free to change it back :-)
Tatti Barletta (2023-04-23 19:00:39+00:00): DeepL translation:
¡Hola y bienvenido a OSM!
Mientras miraba su conjunto de cambios me di cuenta de una extraña red de carreteras en el medio del océano (ejemplo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1158320662). Me imagino que esto fue por error, probablemente un involuntario copiar y pegar, ¿puedes confirmarlo?
emersonveenstra (2023-03-30 10:17:11+00:00): Hi,

Unfortunately I had to remove this path. While it may be true that people go across the road here, it is not actually a path that you can see on the ground. Also it would be dangerous to send people across an uncontrolled, unmarked highway.
WC392309 (2023-04-04 13:25:00+00:00): US 29 and US 50 are still important routes that connect the beltway to Centreville and Gainesville, so that's my justification for trunk classification.
Joseph R P (2023-04-04 23:58:43+00:00): Major highways bypassed by non-toll freeways are almost always most fit for primary classification. For travelling between DC and Gainesville, I 66 is the best route. I 66 is a (usually) free-flowing high-capacity freeway whereas US 29/50 are very congested and have lots of traffic lights, acting more like business routes. The only case it would be better to take the Lee Highway over 66 is if the latter has heavy traffic. 

There is a part of US 50 that is bypassed by I 66 between Merrifield and Arlington tagged as since the Custis Memorial Parkway section of 66 is a toll road, making US 50 act as a shunpike. This would be one of the only rare cases for a bypassed highway like this to warrant trunk classification.
WC392309 (2023-04-05 23:42:29+00:00): I would keep them trunk for 2 reasons

1. The road is a continuous stretch, and connects towns eg Fairfax-Centreville
2. US 50 and US 29 link to motorway-like intersections, which leads to traffic
Joseph R P (2023-04-06 00:47:18+00:00): While this road is a continuous stretch, it crosses about 15 signalized intersections between the intersection of US 29, US 50, and VA 236, and the interchange of VA 28 and US 29 and has a speed limit of 45 mph, making it faster and smoother to bypass the stretch by briefly following US 50 up to I 66 and following it for a few miles down to Centreville. I think in some circumstances like rush hour, US 29 might be just as fast (if not faster) than I 66, but it is for most of the time the slower route.
Stephen Males (2023-09-22 00:56:18+00:00): Hello,
I noticed you have updated the information for many schools in NSW. One of these is incorrect.
Passfield Park School was previously located on Guernsey Ave, Minto, but it has recently relocated to 39 Durham St Minto.
As a result there are now two schools named Passfield Park School in Minto. The one you added is actually on top of Sarah Redfern High and Sarah Redfern Public.
Is it possible to remove the one you added, so there is only one which is located at 39 Durham St Minto?
If unsure, please let me know.
Kind Regards,
Stephen
int03 (2023-11-21 01:44:30+00:00): Hi, sorry about the late response.  It sounds like you have local knowledge, so feel free to edit the map to make it correct.  Do you know how?  (Am I understanding right that the southern feature should only be tagged "Sarah Redfern High School" and the northern feature at the corner of Durham and Pembroke is the only one that should be tagged "Passfield Park School"?)
emersonveenstra (2023-03-30 10:19:19+00:00): Stop changing the address, I fixed it once and you just went and broke it again. I'm going to fix it one more time, please do not edit it again
CurlingMan13 (2023-06-30 17:41:26+00:00): Sounds like the on/off ramps might be open?

https://www.news.iowadot.gov/newsandinfo/2023/03/bridge-replacement-on-polk-county-road-f-22ne-126th-avenue-over-i-35-begins-wednesday-march-29.html#:~:text=Drivers%20may%20find%20that%20the%20north%2D%20and%20southbound%20I%2D35%20ramps%20at%20Exit%2096%20may%20be%20open%20at%20times%20depending%20on%20the%20work%20taking%20place.
RobertTBS (2023-06-30 22:05:21+00:00): I will re check when I drive by tomorrow to be sure. Since I live near here and bike by regularly, I know that the SB ramps closed a few weeks past the closure of the bridge, and the NB ramps closed more recently, and I updated them as of when they closed. From what I know, the ramps won't reopen until I35 SB is moved back over. Since I last checked about a week ago, the ramps were demolished, but I'll check again tomorrow. When the ramps reopen, I plan on marking them as open on OSM.
WoodWoseWulf (2023-03-30 02:52:06+00:00): I'll have to look next time I'm near here, but it might not even exist at all now.
ovruni (2023-03-30 04:14:24+00:00): Hola Patty Díaz, en algunos de sus conjuntos de cambios se han agregado tierras de cultivo con nombres como "cultivo", sin embargo el valor de nombre solamente debe de ir en los casos de que algún objeto tena un nombre en particular y no para agregar descripciones.
Saludos
user_5359 (2023-04-01 06:07:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys)
Igor Bubelov (2024-05-01 03:37:28+00:00): Hi! Do you still accept bitcoins?
Layft Greater (2023-07-13 11:42:08+00:00): Already mapped
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9964229098
eggie (2023-03-30 06:53:33+00:00): Nu een bijdrage in Nederland daarom Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
tyfi (2023-03-30 06:29:21+00:00): I treated the signposts as canonical and put any other names (such as those with unnecessary spaces in them from county GIS data) in alt_name tags.
CiscoJayFlores (2023-03-30 06:29:22+00:00): test
user_5359 (2023-04-01 06:54:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I revert your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys)
Bierphysik (2023-11-28 17:00:03+00:00): Hi. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1158363319/ hat an seinem Nordende keine Verbindung zu einem highway, dafür aber zu einem landuse. Ich vermute Du hast Dich da "vermappt"?
Bierphysik (2023-11-30 20:26:14+00:00): ok, wurde gestern behoben
bwestbom (2023-12-01 09:08:16+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, habe es korrigiert
Tina Cao (2023-03-30 07:03:14+00:00): canceled this requested
Tina Cao (2023-03-30 07:05:12+00:00): Please ignore the above canceled comment and proceed with this request. Thank you!
Tina Cao (2023-03-30 07:36:47+00:00): Please proceed with this request.
Tina Cao (2023-03-30 07:02:46+00:00): canceled this request.
Tina Cao (2023-03-30 07:02:21+00:00): canceled this request.
adiatmad (2023-03-31 04:34:54+00:00): Hi, good work on your edits! However, it would be preferable to avoid adding a generic name, such as name=Building (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1158365923). You might want to take a look at this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). 
If you're keen to know more about mapping, check out the following free resources:
∙ Beginner's Mapping guide - https://osm.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide
∙ Intermediate/Advanced self-paced learning modules - https://learnosm.org
Happy mapping!
Tina Cao (2023-03-30 07:11:47+00:00): cancel this request
Tina Cao (2023-03-30 07:36:12+00:00): cancel this request
bxl-forever (2023-03-30 09:21:49+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for spotting new buildings.

Two things please:

1) Despite it looks like you have been looking at UrbisAdm, your nodes are off by almost a meter each time and we had to check and redo everything.  It looks like you miscalibrated your background layer.

2) ref:UrbIS is a *unique* identifier for every building in the Brussels-Capital Region.  I suspect you have been copying the existing value from nearby buildings (I found ref 5048316 from housenumber 19 copied into housenumber 17, and ref 5048337 from housenumber 13 was apparently copied onto housenumber 15, which was also traced from you).
Please do not do that, adding fake data corrupts the database and generates validation issues.

We fixed it.
Bear-in-a-box (2023-03-31 13:34:36+00:00): Hello Sir ;-)

on 1) I would say a building a little bit off the actual location is better than no building at all ;-)

on 2) indeed, I was not aware about that, I only thought the housenumber needs to be changed. thanks for that!

cheers!
eggie (2023-03-30 07:46:13+00:00): Dag Bas..  Dat gaat niet helpen. Je zult het poortje moeten verbinden met de toegangs weg die naar het binnengedeelte loopt. 
highway=service 
access=? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-03-30 07:47:16+00:00): max height is verkeerde format

Zie
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxheight
Tina Cao (2023-03-30 07:25:20+00:00): cancel this request
EdoBoo (2023-03-30 08:08:14+00:00): Ciao, ma le colonnine non erano due? (le avevo aggiunte io all'epoca)
gspinoza (2023-03-30 08:12:17+00:00): Sì le colonnine sono due, ma - può darsi sbagliando - ritengo che non si debbano mappare le singole colonnine ma la "stazione di ricarica". Per me lì c'è una stazione di ricarica con capacity=4.  In realtà la wiki di OSM non spiega bene come bisogna muoversi, ma penso alla stessa maniera in cui non mappi la singola pistola per il gasolio o benzina in una stazione di servizio ma mappi la stazione di servizio in sé... cosa ne pensi?
EdoBoo (2023-04-03 12:48:49+00:00): Ciao, scusa mi stavo scordando di rispondere: io personalmente preferisco mappare le singole colonnine e segnare la capacità per ognuna (quindi in questo caso sarebbero due colonnine da due posti l'una).
Non so dirti però se sia il modo corretto o meno... se nemmeno la wiki non definisce la cosa non saprei.
gspinoza (2023-04-03 18:19:27+00:00): Però la wiki non dice di mappare la singola colonnina, ma il centro dell'area. Altrimenti la tag capacity non ha molto senso, è ovvio che una colonnina ha 2 slot.
Le Tesla supercharger hanno un punto centrale con capacity tipo 40...
Tina Cao (2023-03-30 07:35:13+00:00): cancel this request
Something B (2023-03-30 13:36:22+00:00): Hi, alexsailaway! 
Phone numbers should be in international format (starting with + sign). 
Regards,
Something B.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134291299