piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Buraddo (2023-12-18 10:54:04+00:00): Salut,
Legat de orașul Plopeni https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/463181287

Am găsit pe site-ul primăriei (https://primariaplopeni.ro/home/istorie) următoarele date: 1938 se înființează Fabrica de armament și Colonia Mărgineanca, în 1945 se schimbă numele în Stejarul, iar în 1968 devine Plopeni.

Nu am găsit nimic despre numele "Ilie Pintilie" cum ai pus.

Nu se potrivește cu datele ce le-ai pus, ai o altă sursă?
alejandroscf (2023-07-30 22:53:45+00:00): Buenos días,

Veo que has borrado más de diez elementos, al borrar se pierde información valiosa del mapa, suele ser recomendable, en primer lugar, contrastar sobre el terreno, si es posible, que ha pasado con ese elemento y en segundo lugar, si fuera necesario, etiquetarlo con los prefijos de ciclo de vida: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Prefijo_de_ciclo_vital

Recibe un cordial saludo,
Alejandroscf
eggie (2023-07-30 21:02:59+00:00): Dag Thijs..
De naam kyn je beter van die pitch afhalen.
Mvg
eggie
Geim (2023-07-30 20:48:46+00:00): Ik heb deze changeset gerevert, zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139170868
eggie (2023-07-30 21:21:09+00:00): Beste Thijs... Stel PDOK actueel in als achtergrond. Die is recenter en ligt goed op z'n plek.
MVG
eggie
kogutowicz-mano (2023-11-25 16:59:59+00:00): Szia!

A "Magány utca" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117333973) nevének mi a forrása?
bordaben (2023-11-25 20:37:54+00:00): Szia!
Visonta TRT:
https://visonta.hu/feltoltesek/allomanyok/Dokumentumok/MENUPONTOK/KOZADATTAR/Telepulesrendezesi%20eszkozok/Telepulesrendezesi%20Terv/KSZ_7_Hat_5_2013_II_20.pdf
kogutowicz-mano (2023-11-26 06:11:28+00:00): Ööö... Ezen nem látok utcaneveket. De a https://visonta.hu/feltoltesek/allomanyok/Dokumentumok/MENUPONTOK/KOZADATTAR/Telepulesrendezesi%20eszkozok/Telepulesrendezesi%20Terv/Telep%C3%BCl%C3%A9srendez%C3%A9siTerv_Bel_Kul_szelvenyhalok_Hat_8_2011_VII_25.pdf megmutatja. Köszi! :-)
Voirie_3M (2023-08-03 09:59:43+00:00): Bonjour Clementader; je suis Bruno Béguin de la Métropole. Merci pour vos nombreuses contributions, c'est précieux !
Nous remarquons cette allée Giotto, que vous avez créée mais qui n'est pas connectée au reste du réseau.
Vous pouvez le corriger?
Merci,
A bientot.
clementader (2023-08-03 12:01:45+00:00): Bonjour Bruno,
Cette allée était initialement reliée à la rue Michel-Ange !
Cependant en travaillant sur ce secteur, je me suis aperçu que cette rue était maintenant coupée par un muret et de la végétation !
Je pensais que l'allée était connectée par l'autre bout ..... Chose que tu as remarqué infondée.
En conséquence, au vue des photos IGN, qui ne laisse pas présager une voie à cet endroit (hormis peut être un chemin piéton ?) j'ai supprimé cette allée en attendant des données plus actualisées.
Merci pour ton alerte .
Jean-Marie CHENEAUX
silversurfer83 (2023-07-31 08:57:46+00:00): Hi there,

why didn't you just update the old pharmacy node which was already at v14? That's what https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix is for and it's good practice to keep the history of a place. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

Please keep those articles in consideration when editing in the future. Thank you

silversurfer83
orivo (2023-07-31 11:18:57+00:00): I wasn't aware that this could be an issue. I will keep this in mind for the future.

As a side note, I also found that the old pharmacy node was not really in the same place. The café appears to occupy a lot more interior space than the pharmacy. But I guess I could've also simply moved the old node in addition to changing its attributes.
nurdafur (2023-09-18 10:53:34+00:00): Hallo Hugskili

Schön, dass du vor kurzem angefangen hast, mit Kartografieren. In diesem Änderungssatz hast du zwei Gebäude gelöscht, die abgerissen wurden. 
Besser wäre gewesen, wenn du dem Tag building das Prefix demolished: vorgestellt hättest. Das sieht dann so aus: 
demolished:building=yes

Wenn Gebäude gelöscht werden, die auf den neuesten Luftbildern noch ersichtlich sind, dann kann es passieren, dass andere Mapper diese wieder zufügen.

Liebe Grüsse und weiterhin viel Spass beim Kartografieren 
Urs
Hugskili (2023-09-21 06:43:01+00:00): Lieber Urs

Herzlichen Dank für deine Anmerkung! Ja, das hab ich übersehen. Ich füge die Gebäude mit dem Prefix demolished wieder hinzu. 
Wenn an gleicher Stelle aber ein Neubau ensteht und die Gebäude sich überlappen würden, würdest du das noch auf dem Satellitenbild erkennbare Gebäude aber schon löschen, oder?

Liebe Grüsse aus Dübendorf
nurdafur (2023-09-21 08:05:27+00:00): Hallo

Ich würde die Gebäide, nun da sie schon mal weg sind, nicht mehr zufügen. Wenn es mit dem Neubau des Mehrzweckgebäudes endlich vorwärts geht, dann ist da sowieso bald eine Baustelle und die kann dann ja so markiert werden.
maraf24 (2023-07-31 09:02:35+00:00): Moim zdaniem od początku to był jeden budynek, a nie dwa. Podział wynikał zapewne z podziału samej działki, więc był sztuczny. Oficjalne obrysu budynków nie są niestety zbyt wiarygodne pod względem fizycznym.
Mirosław Żylewicz (2023-07-31 21:52:16+00:00): Obrysy budynków nie wyglądają najgorzej biorąc pod uwagę skomplikowaną konstrukcję obiektów.

Tak wyglądały wizualizacje dewelopera:
https://i.ibb.co/wK7xtHv/Osiedle-Lawendowe-1.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/7nhvCML/Osiedle-Lawendowe-2.jpg

A tak wygląda budynek po oddaniu do użytku:
https://i.ibb.co/P9mxk7b/Osiedle-Lawendowe-3.jpg
marc-cologne (2023-07-30 21:25:02+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=248388811358719

Radfahrer müssen unter der Brücke am Militärring absteigen
marc-cologne (2023-07-30 21:25:58+00:00): Am Höfchen -> Anlieger frei: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1422318378552139
marc-cologne (2023-07-30 21:28:41+00:00): hgv:conditional am volkshovener WEg https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1770643500053032
Myazyk (2023-07-30 20:39:43+00:00): Для чого ти робиш штучні переклади?
Від того, шо ти зміниш на карті, люди не почнуть називати мікрорайон по-іншому, бо назва склалась історично і живе багато років у побутовій розмовній мові.
Назва російського походження, але це ж склалось історично!
welzheimerwald (2023-12-28 16:22:10+00:00): Wieso baut man eine MP-Relation mit zwei (!) anderen Relationen (!!) als Inner und keinem (!!!) Outer ?

(r16144023 [type=multipolygon] mit r16144021 als inner & r16144022 als inner)

Was ist das für ein Mapping-Unfug? OSM ist kein Spielplatz zum Ausprobieren von Freestyle-Kreativmapping, sondern beruht auf gemeinschaftlichen Konventionen und Standards der Community.
eteb3 (2023-07-30 20:46:58+00:00): This is because of HS2 works that have narrowed the road
gscscnd (2023-07-31 19:40:27+00:00): Czy te elementy public_transport=platform nie powinny mieć highway=bus_stop zamiast highway=bus_station?
starsep (2023-07-31 19:43:31+00:00): Dzięki! Poprawiłem w https://osm.org/changeset/139269264
BCNorwich (2023-07-31 05:56:17+00:00): Hi, Much of your tagging is unnecessary as the highway status implies it. Some of the tags are subjective therefore incorrect for everyone. Also is Flaunden Lane really all oneway?

Regards Bernard.
stick2 (2023-07-31 10:01:11+00:00): Also a drag-error on a building, extending it out of shape to cross the railway.  Also, I'm reasonably sure that Flaunden lane is not a toll road, having used it.
BCNorwich (2023-07-31 12:05:23+00:00): Hi, I've restored the building's shape.
Regards Bernard.
julcnx (2023-07-31 01:43:43+00:00): Hi there! Thank you for your contributions! Just a friendly tip for next time, it's a good practice to save and upload your changes before moving on to the next area. Keep up the great work!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139226285
sannkc (2023-08-05 20:07:34+00:00): Hi!  What exactly did you see to indicate that these are shared use paths?  I see signage indicating that the street is a bike route, but haven't seen any signage indicating the sidewalks are shared use paths.
flyingember (2023-08-05 20:39:32+00:00): KC doesn't mark 90% of shared use paths.  The double width is the giveaway.
sannkc (2023-08-06 02:02:00+00:00): Yes, they are extra wide sidewalks, but width does not confirm anything about access rights.  Just because shared paths are often wide does not mean that all wide paths are designated for shared access.  For that, we need some signage or official documentation.  

In this case, the simpler explanation for the wide sidewalks is that they are boulevard sidewalks. Many of the city's boulevards have extra-wide sidewalks (Armour, Karnes, Cleaver, Benton, Linwood).
flyingember (2023-08-06 02:18:34+00:00): It’s a marked bike route.  There’s no sharrows, bike lane or the like.  So the wide sidewalk is an official biking routs

https://marc-gis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/instant/sidebar/index.html?appid=adfd7dbbf48c4044bdd6e17cba757891
sannkc (2023-08-06 17:29:00+00:00): Except that the route is designated as an on-road bike route (viewable on the MARC map by clicking on the route).
flyingember (2023-08-06 17:55:20+00:00): https://mobikefed.org/2013/01/11-years-later-bikekc-finally-implemented-kansas-city-bicycle-map-and-bike-routes-unveiled

It means there’s biking facilities as the quote from ten years ago shows

So that color on the map can include a shared use path
flyingember (2023-08-06 18:00:06+00:00): The MARC map is wrong as well.  It literally says the data can be wrong.

since there’s no bike facility on road, no lane, no sharrows one can assume the map information is wrong.

But since there’s a trail width path on both sides of the street can assume that it’s the map that has the wrong lane type entered.  

Otherwise persuade MARC to update their map.
sannkc (2023-08-19 04:05:45+00:00): That's your assumption, but all the evidence points to the opposite conclusion.  It's also incorrect to say that there is no bike facility along the road.  There are bike route signs along the road.

The Bike KC Master Plan (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1U9Bdz-xaNzXBN-MDH0QTlIR624cVlF33/view?pli=1) identifies these signs as "share the road signs" for "shared streets" (pg. 45).  The plan acknowledges that shared lane markings are often absent on such routes (pg. 67).  Maps in the master plan show Meyer as an "existing signed bike route/shared road route" (pg. 46), to be eventually upgraded to "major separation" bike path route (pg. 56).

Other sources confirm the MARC map. Jackson County Parks & Rec calls it a "on-street bike trail" on their map: https://www.makeyourdayhere.com/files/assets/parksrec/parks/documents/sw-county-trails.pdf

KC Parks & Rec show a picture of the roadway, not the sidewalks, on its "Meyer Boulevard Bikeway" page, and refers to the bikeway as a street trail: https://kcparks.org/places/meyer-boulevard-bikeway/

Planning documents for the proposed Meyer Boulevard road diet show the possible addition of bike lanes and shared bike-ped paths in the future.  Such changes would be unnecessary if a shared bike-ped path already existed along the corridor (https://www.kcmo.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/3493/637050051816400000).

All the official evidence confirms that this is a on-street bike route, as does the on-the-ground signage.
dadavid (2024-05-08 15:16:34+00:00): Hi jengelh, würde hier [1] 
(Körperraum - Studio für Tanz und Körperarbeit) 
der tag amenity=dance_studio passen? :) Bin mir nicht ganz sicher, finde da auch im internet wenig zu dem Laden, deswegen die Frage :) 

Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß beim mappen

David 

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11077576738
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-30 21:20:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779605779
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779605770
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/194740459

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
JJIglesias (2023-07-31 01:35:31+00:00): Por favor. DEJA DE CAMBIAR los valores de las poblaciones. Los numeros que ves son OFICIALES del INE en base al CNVP2012, solo el proximo CENSO 2024 dira que habitantes tiene cada poblacion. Que tu digas que tiene 125 o 50 o lo que sea, NO cambia pues los valores poblacionales son determinados por ENTES OFICIALES. Asi q por favor DETENTE en cambiar numeros o todos tus cambios seran revertidos.

Si deseas colocar una informacion NO oficial puesdes agregar las etiquetas note=lo q corresponda (Solo sera vista por otros mappers) o la etiqueta fixme=lo q corresponda (Que sera vista por cualquier persona usuaria del mapa). Pero NO borres informacion Oficial EXISTENTE.
Gracias
MILTON CUNAY SARABIA (2023-07-31 01:46:23+00:00): Está bien gracias por las molestias son datos exactos pero espero que el INE aga su Trabajo gracias
JJIglesias (2023-07-31 03:42:54+00:00): Como te dije. Pon tu valores y la Referencia de donde los sacas bajo los tags description=, o note=, o fixme=. Pero no borrando datos existentes con fuente oficial...
Gracias
HellMap (2023-07-31 12:55:57+00:00): Hi (again),

I see you changed  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190498907 back to a road. I surveyed this a couple weeks ago and due to the new construction there was no longer this second long way left and it no longer matched aerial. It looked more like ESRI aerial now. https://imgur.com/mDuab1g

Also, I wouldn't have put https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193423365 as a path - it was easily passable by a wide vehicle before especially at the entrance, unless of course something changed very recently. https://imgur.com/qkQfISZ

My Mapillary hasn't processed yet, but I uploaded two photos for now to compare.
artuuurs (2023-07-31 16:32:26+00:00): Nu čau, čau! :) Revertēju uz was:highway, tur tiešām dabā neredzēju ceļu, bet Google Satelītā bija smuks, tāpēc padomāju, ka ir.

To daļu, ko nomainīju uz path - tur ir sabērtas milzīgas smilšu kaudzes, ar velo var knapi apbraukt pa maliņu - acīmredzot, tas ir noticis pavisam nesen. Laikam jau, kad pabeigs būvēt, tur nebūs ceļa vispār vairs :)
HellMap (2023-07-31 18:36:52+00:00): Nekad neatceros, kuram kādā valodā... haha

Skaidrs, paldies par precizējumu. Jā, tas tad pēdējo divu nedēļu laikā.

Tur TET maršruts iet vēl, drošvien būs jāmaina uz blakus ceļu kaut kad.
Richard Try (2025-05-29 08:00:25+00:00): Линия 686450247 и прочие рядом: точно path? :)
literan (2025-05-29 18:50:00+00:00): конечно. highway=path это ведь не тропинка, а неопределенный путь (неизвестно для кого, но не для машин).

при этом highway=path + foot=designated равнозначно highway=footway

highway=path + bicycle=designated равнозначно highway=cycleway

А highway=path + bicycle=designated + foot=designated - это велопешеходная дорожка. Заменяющего единого тега для нее не придумали

Это все есть в вики
JeroenHoek (2023-07-31 05:57:43+00:00): Alde Leie ligt niet in de gemeente Noardeast-Fryslân. Naar mijn weten hangt hier een tweetalig kombord met Olde Leie onderaan (name:nl). Waarom haal je die naam hier weg? Is het kombord onlangs vervangen?
JeroenHoek (2023-07-31 05:58:33+00:00): Typfout: Olde Leie → Oude Leije
E de Wit (2023-07-31 14:58:09+00:00): Ik ben er vrij zeker van dat de Nederlandse naam nog gewoon op de komborden staat (en ook in gebruik is). Ik moet daar volgende week langs rijden, dan zou ik het kunnen checken.

de provincie Fryslân heeft in een eerdere changeset ook name:nl=Fryslân gekregen.
Dus controle op onjuiste wijzigingen lijkt mij goed.
JeroenHoek (2023-08-04 09:00:31+00:00): Ik heb bij de gemeente Noardeast-Fryslân navraag gedaan over de geplande nieuwe komborden (ik kan zo niet vinden of de Nederlandse namen daarop helemaal verdwijnen), ik wacht dat even af denk ik.

Ik heb van PDZ124169 nog geen reactie gehad. Ik weet niet of ik genegeerd wordt, of dat aan dit account een verouderd e-mailadres hangt.
JeroenHoek (2023-08-04 09:02:52+00:00): Voor Alde Leie geldt dit waarschijnlijk niet zoals je aangeeft. Die ligt nog net in de gemeente Leeuwarden.
E de Wit (2023-08-04 10:40:38+00:00): Oude Leije ligt ook vlak naast 't Bildt, ook daar wordt voornamelijk Nederlands gesproken.

In Noardeast-Fryslân vraag ik mij ook af of ze de komborden van alle plaatsen gaan vervangen. Iet van twee maand geleden had de buurtschap Dokkumer Nieuwe Zijlen in ieder geval nog (alleen) de Nederlandse naamgeving op de buurtschapborden.
E de Wit (2023-08-05 21:07:12+00:00): Survey: het kombord hanteert beide namen met "Alde Leie" boven en "Oude Leije" onder.
JeroenHoek (2023-08-06 16:40:03+00:00): Duidelijk.

Teruggedraaid in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139523841

Ik wacht de gemeente nog even af voor de rest, maar hoe dan ook moeten die Nederlandse namen in een veld (old_name:nl, alt_name:nl, of name:nl).
eggie (2023-08-06 17:25:36+00:00): http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=6397340
Er staan nog wel meer vragen en opmerkingen open waarop nooit is gereageerd. Komt wel vaker voor.
Werkt een PB wel als een emailadres niet meer bestaat?
Eigenlijk geen idee.
Groet..
eggie
JeroenHoek (2023-08-06 17:37:12+00:00): Geen notifications, maar je ziet het natuurlijk wel zodra je een keer inlogt of JOSM opent.
eggie (2023-08-06 17:45:17+00:00): Ik heb een PB gestuurd met het verzoek te reageren.

Groet
eggie
JeroenHoek (2023-07-31 05:55:33+00:00): Zou je even de moeite willen nemen mijn eerdere opmerkingen te lezen en erop te reageren voor je verder gaat met deze edits?

Op de admin-boundary zetten we momenteel alleen de name, de place-node bevat alle varianten. Als je een voorstel wil doen dit anders te doen, bespreek dit dan even op het forum, want de grensrelaties voor plaatsen worden semi-geautomatiseerd bijgehouden.

En wederom: wat je doet is niet 'spelling corrected'. Maak duidelijkere changeset comments.
mike140 (2025-03-23 23:06:19+00:00): Можете пояснити походження назви цього лісу?: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11214859
Myter Erdeli (2025-03-26 11:40:21+00:00): Помилка. Назва мала бути лише для урочища у Білках. Треба виправити
maro21 (2023-08-02 20:05:43+00:00): Usunąłeś tag główny, a [canoe] nie jest tagiem głównym, tylko dodatkowym. Jeśli nie jest to przystań, to co to jest?
mapowicz_pl (2023-08-02 21:59:47+00:00): Tu masz odpowiedź do mojego pytania.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/przystan-kajakowa/101859/4

Wygląda to mniej więcej tak jak na zdjęciu -> https://rafting-wroclaw.pl/
Nie widziałem tam wtedy żadnego pomostu itp, więc pewnie trzeba samemu przenieść kajaki i pontony do wody.
MxxCon (2023-07-30 23:34:04+00:00): Are we doing edit wars now?!
This edit WILL be reverted in full again until you correct all the data problems!
Furthermore, your account will be forwarded to DWG, which can result in account blocks or outright ban.
38`9832|-77`0278 (2023-07-30 23:38:30+00:00): From the forum:

> First of all, you should generally not undo someone else's changeset without talking to them first, and giving them a chance to repair any damage they might have done themselves, or explain why what they did is actually correct

I checked these all by hand before uploading. You said there's "severe problems" with it but you haven't pointed out a problem, nor have you removed the ones you considered problematic. 

I'll ask again: point out an inaccuracy and I'll remove the point.
38`9832|-77`0278 (2023-07-30 23:39:38+00:00): I took over four days to check each of these; don't say "there's a problem" without helping us users and pointing it out.
MxxCon (2023-07-30 23:46:02+00:00): I told you already what kind of data problems were in the revert changeset.

If you would've followed the proper guidelines, those problems would've been spotted BEFORE the corrupted data was imported into OSM!
But since you DID NOT follow the guidelines and imported a huge amount of corrupted data into OSM, it's not acceptable to leave it in the database to hopefully let you repair it, ESPECIALLY since you replied more than 2 WEEKS LATER.
Fix your data first, show it to the community that it's correct and only then consider importing it again.
ZeLonewolf (2023-07-31 00:31:48+00:00): Hi 38`9832|-77`0278 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

It seems that you are running into some friction with other users.

In general, the community will closely scrutinize bulk, wide-area additions of data and will have low tolerance for data errors from these types of additions, as you are experiencing.

The solution is to vet bulk/imported data with the community first, either on Slack or on the community forums.

Slack: https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ channel #imports

Forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Unfortunately, engaging with the community does require additional steps, but that's the price of introducing larger amounts of data using bulk techniques.

I would caution you to avoid "edit warring", as that is likely to cause other users to report your edits to the Data Working Group (DWG), who can issue blocks on your user accounts. In general, the DWG tends to side against users that import data without discussion.

Hopefully we will see you on Slack or the community forums.  Feel free to ping or message me in any space if you would like to chat further.
38`9832|-77`0278 (2023-07-30 23:47:48+00:00): You are reverting a number of well-sourced, carefully checked points.

You claimed that "there are severe data problems" without saying what, or even which points. 

I am trying to edit in good faith. You are taking four days of painstaking work and removing all of it without good reason.

I'll say it again: you can edit points you don't like. If you are convinced it is worth removing four days of work, why have you not taken the 30 seconds it would take to enlighten us about the data problems you found?
MxxCon (2023-07-30 23:51:12+00:00): I'll repeat here AGAIN since you obviously didn't read the other changeset comment:

phone numbers were in the wrong format or corrupted or mushed together.
websites were in the wrong format. without protocol or just completely wrong.
there were other tags with a ton of stuffed keywords... more like for seo rather than anything useful
many biz names were not normalized.

wtf is this... produce=apples;fruit and tree nuts;peach;pear;raspberry;tree nut;herbs and spices;beef;beef cows;lamb;mutton;sheep;honey;chicken;eggs;turkeys;asparagus;cucumber;eggplant;lettuce;mushrooms;potato;squash;tomato
product=hay;honeybees;horses;agritourism

And you have garbage data like this in too many nodes to allow that to be imported into OSM!
julcnx (2023-07-31 01:42:56+00:00): Hey BaghdadiMapper, I'd appreciate it if you could explain why you are removing what appears to be valid contributions from Maps.me in your country and abroad. I haven't noticed any spam in those changes you removed. I've encountered a similar situation with another mapper from Iraq (138107559). Is Maps.me banned in your country? I'm just trying to understand the issue here. Thanks!
LockOnGuy (2023-07-31 03:15:35+00:00): Hello julcnx, I'm from Iraq too, and unfortunately, Iraq and the Middle East in general, maybe other locations around the world too, people add stuff to the map that should be private, like "I parked here", "My friend Ziko" or "My sweet home", etc.. these should've been in their bookmarks not to be uploaded to OSM, few years ago Iraq was filled with thousands and thousands of such nodes that were added by Maps me users, thankfully we established a great community and started to remove the spam and made the map the best map of Iraq online.     
This changeset indeed removed spam, a lot of, but unfortunately, which I believe by mistake it also reverted changeset 139129407, that changeset was spamming the world history tab so it was above Iraq too, and it has 'tourism=camp_site' tag, this tag is one of the most tags used by maps me spam changesets alongside with castle, monument, attraction, viewpoint, place_of_worship, guest_house and many many more, We usually search for spam in overpass turbo from time to time these days and delete them, this will leave the spam undeleted for time in the history tab, therefore people go to the history tab and delete, this is exactly what I believe also happened in the changeset 138107559 that you mentioned also.
About the changeset 139129407 that was deleted by accident I believe, I undeleted the nodes in changeset 139232553.
If you have any other questions about Iraq, you can reach the Iraqi OSM community at https://t.me/OSM_Iraq      
Best Regards.