piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:10:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
MxxCon (2024-05-14 01:50:20+00:00): colour= values on 11897867095 and 11897867097 nodes look invalid..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151208052
MxxCon (2024-05-14 01:50:48+00:00): Ah, i see you fixed it in the following edit. sorry.😅👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151208052
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
AgusQui (2024-05-21 03:21:20+00:00): Estas agregando ciclovías donde no existen, creo que estas malinterpretando las preguntas de StreetComplete, por favor ver:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle
La Révacholiere (2024-05-23 21:33:11+00:00): Buenas! Leí la página completa pero creo que no me cierran las preguntas de la aplicación.

Estoy asumiendo que las ciclovías que no existen serían en donde no hay carril exclusivo? En ese caso estoy marcando "None" o "None, but road shoulder can be used for cycling" dependiendo de la presencia de banquina. En el caso de una calle de sentido único en el contrasentido estoy marcando "shared-use path, both directions" porque muestra una imagen de una vereda con un logo de bicicleta y peatones. Me pasó en aplicaciones de navegación en la bici de tener que llegar a una dirección en una calle en contramano y que me diga que tengo que dar toda la vuelta a la cuadra cuando acá es normal subirse a la vereda. 

En el caso que ese sea el problema y haya un estándar en cómo manejar esas situaciones no tengo problema en arreglar mis cambios, me acuerdo de todo lo que hice. Pido disculpas por el changeset tan grande, la aplicación no me deja partirlo en pedazos más razonables.

Con esto aparte, encontré en tu perfil los links introductorios a la wiki y voy a estar dándoles una leída.

Abrazo
AgusQui (2024-05-24 03:09:35+00:00): Ahí me fijé en la app. Cuando una calle no tiene ninguna infrestructura ciclista en particular (la mayoría), no hace falta responder ninguna de las preguntas.
Aunque si igual quieres responder, la respuesta correcta sería "None" en ambos lados, que agrega el tag cycleway:both=no y deja registrado que relevaste la zona para que no pregunte devuelta. Yo lo tengo en español y dice "no hay nada y no se puede ir en bici en esta dirección", creo que debería decir simplemente "no hay nada" porque el resto de la frase conlleva a que está prohibido circular en bici y eso no es lo que implica cycleway:both=no.
El "None, but road shoulder can be used for cycling" se supone que se debe agregar si es legal el uso de las banquinas por parte de ciclistas, en autopistas obviamente no, en ruta la verdad no sé que dice la legislación. 
El "shared-use path, both directions" lo que hace es indicar que hay una ciclovía de uso compartido con peatones, doble mano. Es normal subirse a la vereda para cortar camino, pero se supone que no se debe hacer, hay que bajarse de la bici y caminar, por lo tanto no indicamos doble sentido de circulación de bicis en calles de sentido único sin ciclovías.
Cualquier duda avisame o también me podés encontrar, junto con el resto de la comunidad, en el chat de Telegram o en el foro (menos usado).
Saludos!
La Révacholiere (2024-06-10 15:52:18+00:00): Buenas, todo bien? Perdón por la demora en contestar.

Sí, revisando la ley la situación es
* Calles: se puede, siguiendo el sentido
* Rutas: no hay nada relacionado al ciclismo que las trate distinto de las calles
* Banquinas: sólo para casos de emergencia, igual que los autos
* Veredas: nunca
* Autopistas: nunca

Es verdad que esto es distinto que lo que se sigue en la realidad, la única vez que un policía de tránsito me dijo que no puedo andar en la vereda me dijo sin un ápice de sarcasmo que tenía que andar en contramano en una calle de un solo carril. Pero OSM es solamente una capa de datos y debería reflejar lo que dice la ley, y si después uno quiere que una engine de ruteado para ciclismo le diga que ande por la vereda eso debería ser responsabilidad de la engine.

Estoy marcando con none los edits que hice con esta señalización. Perdón por la confusión!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
NeisBot (2024-05-12 03:25:14+00:00): Hi Addi88, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1282075990

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
Viajero Perdido (2024-05-12 04:03:23+00:00): Busted!  :D

The walls have eyes.
NeisBot (2024-05-13 01:22:31+00:00): Hi リッキー0219, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/way/1282080809
https://osm.org/way/1282080808
https://osm.org/way/692650553

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-13 05:51:30+00:00): Thanks for your mapped beach.
Looks good!

#HappyMapping
NeisBot (2024-05-12 03:50:15+00:00): Hi リッキー0219, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/way/1282080895
https://osm.org/way/1282080897
https://osm.org/way/1282080896

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-12 11:05:34+00:00): Thanks for your mapped beaches.
Looks good!

#HappyMapping
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
NeisBot (2024-05-13 01:25:40+00:00): Hi リッキー0219, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/way/1282080963
https://osm.org/way/1282080962
https://osm.org/way/1282080961

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-13 05:51:14+00:00): Thanks for your mapped beaches.
Looks good!

#HappyMapping
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
NeisBot (2024-05-13 01:34:10+00:00): Hi リッキー0219, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/way/1282081387
https://osm.org/way/1282081386
https://osm.org/way/1282081385
https://osm.org/way/1282081391
https://osm.org/way/1282081390
https://osm.org/way/1282081389
https://osm.org/way/1282081388

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-13 05:51:03+00:00): Thanks for your mapped beaches.
Looks good!

#HappyMapping
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:10:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:10:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-18 14:16:56+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11897969432/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-12 12:18:57+00:00): Hi Liam126, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting many features, which have been mapped by a different contributor? See: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=151208885

Could you please don't remove and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. Thanks. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

Thanks.
Liam126 (2024-05-14 18:48:10+00:00): Hi Pitscheplatsch,

Good day!

My apologies for my late response. I did not see this message until now. I was unaware of the reason for simply changing objects instead of deleting and redrawing. I will make sure to simply redraw in the future. I have been deleting and redrawing because sometimes the objects are either too far off to quickly and efficiently change to the correct shapes or when they are off but have too many points to quickly and efficiently change to the correct shapes. Going forward I will refrain from deleting any objects created by other contributors unless they are no longer there, like a few of the bunkers on some of the courses, and I will do my best to work with what is already there.

Have a great day!

Sincerely,
Liam
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-18 14:16:54+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11897966592/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
NeisBot (2024-05-13 01:36:28+00:00): Hi banarepu, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1282086785

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-13 05:50:34+00:00): Thanks for your mapped beach.
Looks good!

#HappyMapping
NeisBot (2024-05-12 04:50:16+00:00): Hi banarepu, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1282086890

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-12 11:07:44+00:00): Thanks for your mapped beach.
Looks good!

#HappyMapping
Firefishy (2024-05-13 09:21:30+00:00): Thank you for the improvement. Any more local knowledge is appreciated.