piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
rempshaener (2024-10-18 07:41:26+00:00): Guten Morgen,
ich habe drüber geschaut, das sieht alles gut aus.
Die fehlenden Durchmesser kann man auch ganz gut vor Ort ergänzen; die App StreetComplete fragt z.B. nach fehlenden Werten bei Hydranten, damit ist das schnell ergänzt.
Wenn noch Fragen offen sind: einfach melden.
Viele Grüße
ObscureAngel (2024-10-18 10:29:01+00:00): Bonjour ! Merci pour votre contribution !

"name=Flammes du Monde" était très bien, si vous souhaitez ajouter la branche locale de La Roche, vous pouvez ajouter "branch=La Roche-sur-Yon" et remettre le nom en "Flammes du Monde" :)

Bonne journée et bonne cartographie !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158036366
gurglypipe (2024-10-18 10:32:22+00:00): Hi, you appear to have deleted Heysham harbour again. Please be careful not to do that :)

If you think the harbour should be mapped differently, please say what you think is wrong about the current mapping, and we can work out how to improve it. Thanks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
cuzi (2024-10-18 09:14:44+00:00): Woher hast du diese Informationen?
wies1 (2024-10-18 15:12:30+00:00): Hallo,
danke für die Anmerkung. Hab gerade gesehen, dass du recht hast und die Seegartenklinik zum Adenauerplatz 4/1 gehört, so wie auch das entsprechende Gebäude. Habs gerade entsprechend korrigiert. War mein Fehler.
Gruss
wies1
hope hill4111 (2024-10-19 00:48:21+00:00): chicago
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
NeisBot (2024-10-18 07:58:32+00:00): Ooops, it seems that some of your names are a bit unusual ...

Amount>=1
#NeisLab #Minutely #Naming
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-18 17:29:58+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158046043
NeisBot (2024-10-18 07:20:24+00:00): Ooops, it seems that some of your names are a bit unusual ...

Amount>=1
#NeisLab #Minutely #Naming
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-18 08:12:35+00:00): Hi emmallnd, welcome to OSM.

Thanks for your map edits, looks good!

#HappyMapping
NeisBot (2024-10-18 07:58:52+00:00): Ooops, it seems that some of your names are a bit unusual ...

Amount>=1
#NeisLab #Minutely #Naming
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-18 17:29:44+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158046043
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-18 17:29:30+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158046043
rab (2024-10-18 19:31:23+00:00): already there

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/274933475
Frans S (2024-10-22 13:00:41+00:00): Hello. When you map an amenity, please map it not that sloppy by crossing buildings. Just map the area more precise.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158037383
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-18 17:29:16+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158046043
JeroenHoek (2024-10-18 07:47:05+00:00): Probeer geen wijzigingen te doen in zaken zoals openbaarvervoerrelaties als je met iets anders bezig bent. Nu voeg je operator:wikidata toe aan de treindiensten tussen Leeuwarden en Groningen, terwijl je changeset comment 'update boerderij' is.

Splits zoiets op zodat je changesets groter worden dan nodig en niet lokaal detailwerk met regionale metadata mixen.
brimzw (2024-10-18 10:20:42+00:00): Ik zal er af blijven in het vervolg. Bij opslaan kwamen er nog een aantal issues naar boven die konden worden opgelost door de software de voorgestelde wijziging te laten uitvoeren. Had misschien niet gemoeten. Als het fout is draai het maar terug.
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-18 17:29:01+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158046043
NeisBot (2024-10-18 07:27:27+00:00): Ooops, it seems that some of your names are a bit unusual ...

Amount>=1
#NeisLab #Minutely #Naming
Jordi MF (2024-10-18 13:03:17+00:00): Esta edición es un acto vandálico. Habría que revertir todo el changeset
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-18 17:27:29+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158045805
TrickyFoxy (2024-10-18 20:01:33+00:00): В name указывается основная часть
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-18 17:27:52+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158046043
Langlaeufer (2024-10-23 13:17:29+00:00): mit use_sidepath 
cycleway:left=track und sidewalk=both in am Gerhardshof passt wohl nicht mehr. Korrigiere ich mal
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158037804
Langlaeufer (2024-10-23 13:41:23+00:00): Hast du das vor Ort  geprüft, dass seit 2023 zwischen Ahrensdorf und Milmersdorf die 240er Zeichen aufgestellt wurden? Auf den verfügbaren Fotos seht da noch nichts.
Vinber-Pro (2024-10-20 16:14:02+00:00): bonjour,
le nom est une description et pour l'accès il est préférable de préciser access=private

à plus
SomeoneElse (2024-11-18 20:39:23+00:00): Please can you explain, on the forum c.osm.org , why you think that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11629870960/history should be deleted.  
In https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16885 you have just now been warned about this sort of "tit for tat" deletion - if you believe that something is wrong you must discuss it on the forum before changing it.
desertivy (2024-11-18 21:11:06+00:00): I have explained this a million times before. Please do me a favor and read the last email on Ticket#2024070410000292. If you are still not convinced, then I believe nothing will convince you.
SomeoneElse (2024-11-18 21:36:27+00:00): > then I believe nothing will convince you.

To be clear - there is a lot of information in that private message to the DWG.  Unfortunately, that tells us only what we know already - that one side of a name dispute has one view about what things should be called.

I know of plenty of places (including within my own country) where there are disputes and it's easy to find statements from government officials that back up _both_ sides - because different levels of government support different sides of the argument.
That's why I suggested discussing opening in the forum, where everyone can see it.
desertivy (2024-11-19 12:28:25+00:00): >I suggested discussing opening in the forum, where everyone can see it.

If you mean by everyone the Iraqi community, then I'm here to tell you there is no such thing, there is no "everyone". If I can get you to understand this I'll die a happy man; the only person who can solve any dispute of any sort in iraq is the mods, they have to look at the facts presented and take a decision based on them and decidr who's right and who's wrong, anything other than that is a waste of time and energy, respectfully.

I know this defeats the purpose of OpenStreetMap by not involving the community, but till we have a real community, we only have this option.
SomeoneElse (2024-11-19 12:44:40+00:00): @desertivy - I am trying to help you here.  You can ignore my suggestions and carry on as before, but as you've seen that isn't working out so well.

The top-down model that you are suggesting simply won't work for OSM.  I agree that right now there is no functioning OSM community in Iraq (there are only people representing their own narrow interests). I am suggesting that you try and get the community beyond Iraq's borders involved to work around that.

You and LockOnGuy are both part of the problem, and you both try and pretend that you are right and the "other side" is wrong.
desertivy (2024-11-19 15:30:09+00:00): Firstly, I’m not sure what exactly involving a wider community will accomplish. Ultimately, I’ll be presenting the same facts to them that I’ve already shared with you. The outcome will likely come down to who can convince more people, which doesn’t necessarily guarantee the solution is the right one. This issue should be about objective accuracy, not persuasion, and I believe the facts should lead the way, not the majority opinion.

Additionally, as I live in the area of the dispute, my understanding of the situation is more grounded in real experience. My opinion is backed by evidence and facts, which gives it a level of authenticity that an outsider, unfamiliar with the local context, may not fully grasp. While I do see value in external perspectives when they are based on the same factual information, the direct experience I have makes my position particularly relevant.

Finally, labeling me and the other as "part of the problem" without offering any real argument only shifts the focus away from solving the issue. I’m not here to claim superiority or insist on being “right.” My goal is simply to find a practical solution. Focusing on who is right or wrong won’t move us forward—it will only prolong the conflict.
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-18 17:28:12+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158046043
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-18 08:16:53+00:00): I think all of today's changesets by this contributor should be reverted.
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-18 17:28:31+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158046043
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
acsd (2024-10-19 07:24:18+00:00): Часть пути которая проходит под аркой, правильнее помечать тегом tunnel=building_passage, без тега layer=-1 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage
Jbah (2024-12-09 12:53:24+00:00): Hi,
der hier bearbeite Weg hat am Südende ein DE:239 stehen, was ein oneway für Radfahrer darstellt. Habe es angepasst.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160090767

Wahu habe ich bereits darauf hingewiesen, dass es sich hierbei tatsaechlich um ein path mit bicycle=designated handelt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159735104

Herzlich willkommen bei OSM und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen :D
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Kapyrus (2024-10-18 08:04:30+00:00): #btcmap
eggie (2024-10-18 08:13:26+00:00): Dag Darkraisisi,

Beter geen adresnodes veranderen. 
Het is officiële import vanuit de BAG (Kadaster) Nu ontbreekt adresnode 15.
office=yes hoort niet op de gebouwomtrek.
building=office kan weer wel.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Doffice
13-15 is geen officieel uitgegeven adres. Dat doen bedrijven vaak zelf. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-10-18 08:15:30+00:00): office=yes verwijderd.
building=office toegevoegd. 
Bedrijven kun je taggen op de adresnodes en dan is soms office=....  nodig om de aard van het bedrijf te duiden.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-10-18 08:17:33+00:00): Dag Fernando,

Zo kan het wel inderdaad.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-10-18 08:24:23+00:00): Dag Fernando..  Dit zijn geen parkeerterreinen. Dus anders taggen.
Naast amenity=parking ook taggen parking= street_side en orientation=perpendicular. 
Probeer ook wat netter iets in te tekenen. 

Een poort die open kan taggen we meestal op een node verbonden met de weg met barrier=gate .

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-10-18 08:29:34+00:00): Wanneer je street_side gebruikt zie je niet al die parkeerterreinen op de kaart, maar een kleinere P die verdwijnt als je uitzoomt.
Ik heb het als voor beeld aangepast.
MVG
eggie
Komadinovic Vanja (2025-01-22 17:58:29+00:00): Поздрав,

Заменио сам https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1324950119/history/1 са https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12522249691 што више одговара столовима са шаховском таблом. Јави уколико се не слажеш.

Не знам да ли си активан / на унутар OSM заједнице Србије, шаљем пар линкова у случају да ниси. Званични сајт [1]. Форум [2] је одлично место за праћење активности и размену идеја. За мање формалне дискусије користимо Telegram групу корисника из Србије “osm_sr” [3]. Поред форума и Telegram групе постоји и званична мејлинг листа [4]. Кратак преглед стандарда за мапирање најбитнијих објеката можеш видети на [5]. Више о пријектима у којима учествује ОСМ заједница у Србији можеш видети на [6]. Билтен [7] је место где покушавамо да објединимо сва дешавања у месецу.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Serbia/Projekti/Održavanje_pešačkih_staza_Srbije  
[2] https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=12433999  
[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking, део Elements of a relation  

[1] https://openstreetmap.rs  
[2] https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/rs  
[3] https://t.me/osm_sr  
[4] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-rs  
[5] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Serbia/Mapping_Serbia  
[6] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Serbia/Projekti  
[7] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Serbia/Projekti/Bilten  

Срдачан поздрав,
Вања
canfe (2024-10-18 09:36:41+00:00): Hai tolto delle piante che l'aeroporto Pertini riconosce come importanti e pericolose per la navigazione aerea.
Paralovo lo hai sentito per sapere se son state tagliate e quindi rimuovibili?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158039161
ivanbranco (2024-10-18 09:57:40+00:00): Anche se non fossero importanti per la navigazione aerea, se esistono perché cancellarli?
Jrachi (2024-10-18 10:23:01+00:00): natural tree senza altre informazioni sono buoni candidati alla cancellazione perché utili solo a vederli sulla mappa!
Se mi dici quali sono di importanza per la navigazione aerea li ripristino immantinente
ivanbranco (2024-10-18 10:41:17+00:00): Questa é una tua opinione. Se un albero esiste e viene mappato non vedo perché eliminarlo. E non stiamo nemmeno parlando di alberelli, questo albero ad esempio ha una chioma con un raggio di 9 metri!: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9534831642

Eliminarli inoltre impedisce ad altri mapper di aggiungere informazioni aggiuntive con StreetComplete ad esempio, che ti chiede leaf_type e species/genus.
Jrachi (2024-10-18 11:43:27+00:00): Già ripristinato
GPar (2024-10-18 14:16:06+00:00): Quegli alberi li abbiamo censiti ovviamente con altri sistemi però mi era comodo in alcune situazioni visualizzarli anche sulle mappe OSM. 
Ove ritenete potete cancellare senza remore,  non è certo indispensabile averli qui.  Alcuni di cui ho avuto notifica del taglio li avevo già tolti io. 
Grazie
eggie (2024-10-18 08:34:25+00:00): Beste Test   Neem svp even contact op voordat je verder mapt. Je changeset draai ik nu terug.
Wat is je bedoeling hier?
Alle vervoermiddelen zijn hier per default toegestaan. emergency=yes hoort niet op reguliere wegen.. Alleen in gevallen om een verbod bv motor_vehicle=no te overrulen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-10-18 08:37:05+00:00): reverted by changeset #158039943

Mocht je vragen hebben stel ze gerust.
eggie (2024-10-18 08:46:47+00:00): Sommige routers hebben wellicht problemen met de highway=track tracktype=grade1   Dus gewoon verhard.
De oplossing ligt dan bij de appbouwer .. niet bij OSM. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=51.43486%2C4.97320%3B51.42605%2C4.99002#map=15/51.43037/4.98153

en

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_car&route=51.43362%2C4.97423%3B51.42619%2C4.98955#map=14/51.42629/4.97393

MVG
eggie
Test385 (2024-10-18 09:28:12+00:00): Deze straat is toch enkel toegestaan voor plaatselijk verkeer? 
Dus toch niet voor iedereen? 
Dus als er een emergency voertuig wil navigeren van Weelde naar Baarle. Wordt deze toch rond gestuurd. Wat niet de bedoeling is.
eggie (2024-10-18 09:38:58+00:00): Oke, maar die tagging motor_vehicle=destination ontbreekt hier.
Wanneer dat werkelijk het geval is dan dus een combinatie maken van motor_vehicle=destination
met emergency=yes

Ook moped en mofa=yes toevoegen.. want OSM ziet die als motorvoertuigen.

Het probleem zal hier nu dus niet het bestemmingsverkeer zijn ben ik bang.

Ik heb het al bovenstaand aangepast. Blijft een raadsel waarom het in de hulpdienstenapp niet routeerde. Wellicht zit dat in de voorkeur voor highway=unclassified tov highway=track.

Bedankt voor je reactie..
Nu dus even afwachten of het gaat routeren.
MVG
eggie
Geo-Tobi (2024-10-26 05:55:22+00:00): Hi, bitte den Namen entfernen. Das ist kein offizieller Name, gemäß der OSM Wiki Regeln. (Note: der Name wäre zB in Navigationssystemen ersichtlich. Das ist sinnfrei)
NieWnen (2024-10-18 19:05:42+00:00): Ten odcinek jest zbędny, nie ma tutaj fizycznego rozdzielnia + przy dodawaniu takich należy zadbać o odpowiednie relacje restrykcji.
mueschel (2024-10-19 15:06:15+00:00): Please stop reverting the edits of other mappers.
You repeatedly added undocumented tags here which already have been fixed four times.
eggie (2024-10-18 08:48:21+00:00): Lijkt me prima zo.
eggie (2024-10-18 08:50:12+00:00): De leisure=park heb ik omgezet naar landuse = grass.
Niet alles is een park.
NeisBot (2024-10-18 09:14:07+00:00): Ooops, it seems that some of your names are a bit unusual ...

Amount>=1
#NeisLab #Minutely #Naming
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-18 09:39:43+00:00): Hi MaliMrav-Bot,

I think that due to the size of your changeset and the large number of changed and/or added items with names, there were some (few?) names that were rather strange or unusual for geographic elements.

I will not investigate the cause further.

Best regards.
Romain47 (2024-10-25 07:00:59+00:00): en bien
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-24 03:06:37+00:00): Please don't add fake roads
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158041110
AkuAnakTimur (2024-10-18 17:05:17+00:00): https://osm.org/go/4Gpm_gyvO?m=&changeset=158041324

Sini memang takde divider, kalau boleh jangan map seolah-olah ada divider

- orang Alor Setar yang kerap lalu di sini
AkuAnakTimur (2024-10-18 17:07:04+00:00): https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/59#issuecomment-692530410
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-24 09:54:18+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158042375
Rodrigo Rega (2024-10-20 18:01:41+00:00): Hola.

El comentario de este conjunto de cambios no es lo suficientemente descriptivo para que el resto de usuarios se hagan una idea de cuáles han sido los elementos que se han editado. Por favor, consulta la siguiente página para saber como hacer comentarios que faciliten el trabajo de revisión de ediciones: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios

Gracias por tus aportes a OpenStreetMap.

Un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158041640
map per (2024-10-18 17:51:53+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Gutachterix sollte nicht als Gebäudename, sondern als neuer Sachverständigenbüro Punkt eingezeichnet werden. Ich hab beispielhaft schon mal die Kreillerstraße richtig eingezeichnet (siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12263978760)

Viele Grüße
map per
hk51 (2024-10-22 16:24:11+00:00): das sieht offensichtlich nach SPAM aus
siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/njrig78qbn/history
A35K (2024-10-22 17:22:58+00:00): @hk51
Falls es keine Antworten/Verhaltensänderungen gibt werde ich wahrscheinlich die DWG kontaktieren, da die Daten falsch/sehr ungenau sind
Vinber-Pro (2024-10-20 10:55:09+00:00): bonjour,
tu as défini l'ensemble comme étant un bâtiment alors que c'est la délimitation de la gendarmerie que tu souhaitais ajouter (et à l'intérieur il y a des batiments !)

j'ai retiré building=yes

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158122870#map=14/44.58605/-0.03540

et ton commentaire de changesets n'est pas assez explicite :)

à plus