piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aTarom (2024-04-11 07:06:36+00:00): Hola, no es correcto en el catalán de la Franja el uso de "Carrera" para referirse a Calle?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238329143/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363397253/history
Veo que la gerra de ediciones es muy notable (está engordando innecesariamente la base de datos) y quiero preguntarte primero ya que entiendo que eres de la zona
Saludos
Xvtn (2024-04-11 15:21:05+00:00): Howdy! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great to me, no complaints! Thanks for your contributions.
Frans S (2024-04-25 14:19:51+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not map/tag the whole task as wood, the whole area (nearly the whole project) is already mapped as wood. TM4 is not suited to map those big areas since you only see a small area ,1 task at the time.
Best regards and keep mapping.
matarranyacorrector (2024-04-11 22:46:30+00:00): Escríbele al autor de la obra, a ver qué piensa él sobre que tú afirmes que "No pone eso": https://redmaestros.com/maestros-cat/jose-manuel-aragones-erruz/

Te lo resumo: el texto que hay escrito en el monumento es "Per la pau, el diàleg i la fraternitat al món". Paradójicamente, nada que se te pueda atribuir a ti.
Xvtn (2024-04-11 15:18:28+00:00): Howdy! Welcome to OSM. I went over your changes here and everything looks great to me! Thanks for your contributions.
Udarian (2024-04-11 14:48:42+00:00): entrance=* only goes on the intersection of a building and a road or footpath of some sort, it represents the spot you enter a building at. It doesn’t go on a road like this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149846018
Udarian (2024-04-11 14:49:06+00:00): entrance=* only goes on the intersection of a building and a road or footpath of some sort, it represents the spot you enter a building at. It doesn’t go on a road like this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149846071
JJIglesias (2024-04-12 07:11:03+00:00): Saludos. Favor Revisar
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Edificios

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas_en_Espa%C3%B1a
Udarian (2024-04-11 15:13:35+00:00): noexit=yes only goes on the end of a way so placing it here would be wrong. noexit represents a spot were a road that may be close to other ways does no connect to those ways, the road it’s on doesn’t have an exit.

Happy mapping
Udar
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149846120
emersonveenstra (2024-04-11 10:32:33+00:00): Hi there,

Did you mean to put "intermittent=water" here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1271642295
JJIglesias (2024-04-12 07:10:07+00:00): Saludos. Favor Revisar
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Edificios

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas_en_Espa%C3%B1a
JJIglesias (2024-04-12 07:09:40+00:00): Saludos. Favor Revisar
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Edificios

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas_en_Espa%C3%B1a
citrula (2024-04-11 06:22:03+00:00): You can press "Q" to square objects with iD. Also, building=detached is used for single-family homes on OSM, building=house is more generic (but still correct). Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149846404
JJIglesias (2024-04-12 07:07:43+00:00): Saludos. Favor Revisar
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dfootway
JJIglesias (2024-04-12 07:05:26+00:00): Saludos. Favor Revisar
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Edificios

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas_en_Espa%C3%B1a
JJIglesias (2024-04-12 07:04:53+00:00): Saludos. Favor Revisar
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Edificios

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas_en_Espa%C3%B1a
Xvtn (2024-04-11 15:14:12+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great! One suggestion I have is to tag the buildings more specifically, eg house, garage, etc. But that isn't strictly necessary, just easier to classify while adding them rather than coming through later, if that makes sense.
Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contributions!
Xvtn (2024-04-11 15:17:14+00:00): Oh, looking over a few of your other changesets, looks like you're mostly doing more specific tagging anyway. Nice!
JJIglesias (2024-04-12 07:02:36+00:00): Favor Revisar

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dfootway
citrula (2024-04-11 06:31:51+00:00): Tennis courts should be mapped separately, and footways should be connected to the main road network for routing. Otherwise, this edit looks good to me.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149846660
arbstron (2024-04-11 06:51:31+00:00): Should I create a new change to fix the errors with this one?
citrula (2024-04-11 09:39:38+00:00): Go for it! Happy to answer any questions you may have
JJIglesias (2024-04-12 07:00:30+00:00): Saludos. Favor Revisar
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Edificios

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas_en_Espa%C3%B1a
JJIglesias (2024-04-12 06:59:20+00:00): Saludos. Favor Revisar
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Edificios

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas_en_Espa%C3%B1a
Xvtn (2024-04-11 15:12:12+00:00): Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed asap! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits, and use a company OSM account for all edits made by the same person. I've reverted your changes.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149869391
NeisBot (2024-04-11 05:34:02+00:00): Hello Keepconic, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Udarian (2024-04-12 16:31:39+00:00): Small note here, seamark:type=* is intended for features todo with boats and other things that navigate on water. Since this was added on land features not close enough to water this is incorrect. The same applies to waterway=lock_gate since it to is  for water based features and from what I can tell must be placed on something like a canal, river or other waterway. If you want to indicate that there’s a locked gate somewhere you can add a gate and add the tag of locked=yes.

Happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149847522
osmviborg (2024-04-11 06:42:21+00:00): surface=?
Map-Peter (2024-04-13 09:22:46+00:00): Hallo ewulff,
 
bitte mappe keine POI doppelt.  
Dieser Campingplatz ist bereits seit 2009 in OSM und mit "nohousenumber=yes" klar gekennzeichnet.  
siehe:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38196646/history  
und:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nohousenumber
 
Ich habe eben auch den Alternativnamen: "C35 Naturcamping Drewensee" zum "name=*" gemacht, obwohl auf deren Webseite (die schon wieder nicht erreichbar ist) der offizielle Name: "Naturcamping Drewensee" stand.
 
Der Kurzname ist: "C35" , aber das ist keine Hausnummer. (So wie z.B. beim Nachbarcampingplatz: "C10 Campingplatz am Drewensee" oder "C20 Campingplatz am Leppinsee" oder "C42 Naturcampingplatz am Zotzensee").
 
Gruß Peter
fortera_au (2024-04-11 06:35:54+00:00): Hey there, where you've got the school and kindergarten next to each other, you can use the same nodes where their borders meet to make it cleaner.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149847964
Xvtn (2024-04-11 15:08:42+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great! Thanks for your contributions.
Xvtn (2024-04-11 15:09:50+00:00): One tip is that on the Edgemar Court intersection, you might consider adding a crossing there instead of connecting the sidewalk directly to the roadway.
Udarian (2024-04-12 16:52:43+00:00): Question:
I was wondering why you removed this parking lot, it is still on the latest imagery. 

Happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149848098
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-06-03 06:32:52+00:00): Hallo,

was war der Grund für die Änderungen? Warum wurde lediglich eine Quelle (source-Tag) hinzugefügt?

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
N1T3R (2024-04-11 07:09:59+00:00): Please upload changes in a small area as a separate changeset.

Changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Have a look at: "Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering.
user_21293476 (2024-04-11 08:21:05+00:00): I apologize very much for some reasons. I will fix the distortion in the path later
JJIglesias (2024-04-12 06:58:16+00:00): Saludos. Favor Revisar
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Edificios

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas_en_Espa%C3%B1a
flohoff (2024-04-11 09:44:58+00:00): Hi,
wie lange wird denn die Sperrung dauern? 

Im routing hat das ziemlich reingehauen z.b. 

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=526733,758187#51.96739,8.67597,15z

Flo
JuanCarlos80 (2024-04-11 17:19:01+00:00): Hi,

bis Mitte Mai (mind.), laut diesem Artikel:
https://www.nw.de/lokal/kreis_lippe/uebersicht/23821533_Scherenkrug-Kreuzung-wird-voll-gesperrt.html
JuanCarlos80 (2024-04-12 06:41:21+00:00): Bezugnehmend auf deinen Beitrag in der Mailingliste:
Die von mir als access=no markierten Straßen werden verschwunden sein, wenn der Neubau abgeschlossen ist, d.h. die Tunnelstraße wieder mit Asemissen verbunden sein wird. Im Moment sind sie nur durch Baustellengitter etc. unzugänglich gemacht, aber ich gehe davon aus, dass sich das zeitnah durch Abriss ändern wird.
rskedgell (2024-04-11 08:09:52+00:00): I see that you have added informal=yes to this path, implying that it is an unmaintained desire line. However it has a name and appears from aerial imagery to be maintained.

Also, changing highway=bridleway|cycleway|footway to highway=path may not be entirely helpful to renderers or routers.
tekim (2024-04-13 21:06:21+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.  Thanks for your edits to the map, we appreciate it!  I see you cited Google Maps and Apple Maps as two of your sources.  Unfortunately, when editing OpenStreetMap we are not allowed to use either of those sources due to their Terms of Service.

I also noticed that there were some crossing highways in the area you edited.  Highways shouldn't simply cross, but should be connected with a shared node (unless there is a bridge - which I don't think is the case here)
tekim (2024-04-13 21:06:38+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149969875
lipuma (2024-04-29 11:54:31+00:00): Please do not vandalise the map. I reverted some of your changesets in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150659495

Other changesets by you have also been reverted by other mappers.
user_21293476 (2024-04-11 08:20:47+00:00): I apologize very much for some reasons. I will fix the distortion in the path later
Taya_S (2024-04-13 12:56:52+00:00): Ziet er goed uit!
IBT3032 (2024-04-15 17:24:36+00:00): Bedankt :). Wat groen fleurt alles op ;-).
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-11 08:10:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11809082841
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396725493

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
aceman444 (2025-03-07 22:28:48+00:00): Podla coho tam mozu len lesnicke vozidla?
vasony (2024-04-20 13:37:16+00:00): Szia!

old_addr:* a régi házszámok helye, _old suffix. Javítottam.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Jel%C3%B6l%C3%A9si_p%C3%A9ld%C3%A1k

Tamás
vasony (2024-04-20 13:37:40+00:00): mármind _old suffix a rossz.
JJIglesias (2024-04-12 06:52:31+00:00): Saludos. Favor Revisar
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Edificios

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas_en_Espa%C3%B1a
kenken234 (2024-04-11 18:17:12+00:00): Hi just checking if the road is open or still under construction? Was in the area last week and the road wasn't open yet
kenken234 (2024-04-21 16:00:22+00:00): Hi, just passed by the area today and some of the roads you've changed are still under construction. Please do not use "access = no" and  remove construction tags for roads that are still U/C
krza (2024-04-11 09:32:48+00:00): Die PLZ 50725 ist korrekt. Bitte nicht ändern, wenn man nicht sicher ist, dass die Änderung stimmt.
misterte (2024-04-11 10:38:10+00:00): https://www.ford.de/ford-entdecken/highlights-und-aktuelles/standorte-anfahrt

Ford-Werke Köln-Merkenich
John-Andrews-Entwicklungszentrum
Spessartstraße, Tor 54
50769 Köln
krza (2024-04-11 13:56:57+00:00): Ja genau, das ist die Besucheradresse, aber nicht die formale Adresse des Standorts. Deswegen kann man beim Tor auch gerne die 50769 lassen (wie ich in der "note" nun auch geschrieben habe), aber beim Standort gehört die nicht hin.
misterte (2024-04-11 16:09:32+00:00): unter https://www.ford.de/ford-entdecken/highlights-und-aktuelles/standorte-anfahrt steht eindeutig

Im Folgenden erhalten Sie nähere Informationen zu unseren Ford-Standorten in Deutschland.

Ford-Werke Köln-Merkenich
John-Andrews-Entwicklungszentrum
Spessartstraße, Tor 54
50769 Köln

also Standort 50769
krza (2024-04-11 18:23:43+00:00): Ja, das steht dort. Aber es steht dort unter "Anfahrt", bezeichnet also einen konkreten Ort in Merkenich. Das Tor hat ja auch die 50769 erhalten, weil es quasi "nur" der lokale Anlaufpunkt ist, die Besucheradresse.

Aber noch einmal: Die Ford-Werke an sich haben eine Großkunden-PLZ, und zwar die 50725. Das ist die offizielle PLZ dieser Institution, und sie gilt sowohl für Merkenich als auch für Niehl, und in Niehl ist auch der offizielle Hauptsitz. Um die Verwirrung komplett zu machen, listet die Post sie daher beide gleichzeitig auf, wenn man dort nach den Ford-Werken sucht.

Die Frage ist hier vielleicht, wie man die postcode-Angabe versteht. Aber sie ist Teil der Adressdaten und somit ein administratives Merkmal und nicht notwendigerweise ein geografisches. In OSM wird das leider weder genau definiert, weil diese Art von Sonderfällen einfach nicht thematisiert werden, noch gibt es eine weitere Detailstufe, die man zusätzlich verwenden könnte.

Vielleicht sollte ich die Adresse aus dem Namensknoten komplett rausnehmen und wieder auf den reinen Namen zurückgehen. Der macht es schwierig genug im Zusammenhang mit einer Adresse, weil es offenbar auch keinen "Adresszusatz" gibt in OSM, in dem man ihn unterbringen könnte.Die Adresse kommt dann an das Firmengelände, auch wenn da sicher auch wieder jemand was dran auszusetzen hat ;)
misterte (2024-04-11 20:47:11+00:00): Richtig, bei der 50725 handelt es sich um eine Postleitzahl für Großempfänger, also Firmen die mehr als 2000 Sendungen pro Werktag erhalten. Dadurch ist eine Angabe von Straße und Hausnummer nicht notwendig bei Postsendungen, nur PLZ und Ort. Das gilt aber nur für Postsendungen, ähnlich einem Postfach.

Das ändert aber nichts an der PLZ für Objekte wie Flächen oder Gebäude usw., da kommt dann trotzdem die postalische Anschrift mit geografischer PLZ dran.

Wenn man auf dem PLZ Server https://www.postdirekt.de/plzserver/ nach Ford-Werke sucht bekommt man auch die geografischer PLZ

Ford Werke GmbH	50725	Köln	Henry-Ford-Str. 1, 50735 Köln

auch Ford selber gibt z.B. beim Kundenzentrum oder der Ford Bank als Postanschrift nicht die 50725 an

https://www.ford.de/nuetzliche-informationen/impressum

Ford-Werke GmbH Kundenzentrum 
Henry-Ford-Str. 1 
50735 Köln

Ford Bank GmbH
Henry-Ford-Straße 1
50735 Köln
JJIglesias (2024-04-12 06:57:52+00:00): Saludos. Favor Revisar
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Edificios

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas_en_Espa%C3%B1a
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2024-04-20 12:04:01+00:00): Ten adresní uzel byl posunut https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/296635019 stejně jako sousední adresa. Stačí si zapnout překryv katastrální mapy ČÚZK nebo si zadat referenční číslo adresy za https://vdp.cuzk.cz/vdp/ruian/adresnimista/.
mikimapbuilder (2024-04-11 09:55:37+00:00): Building shape was ajusted to the satelite imagery
ZeLonewolf (2024-06-17 23:14:24+00:00): Changeset reverted due to no trespassing sign that I observed during survey.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152823038
mstrbrid (2025-03-13 23:28:40+00:00): Hi, Joseph2541,
I've just moved the neighbouring carpark back to it's correct position after I found it mistakenly dragged on to Gloucester Road. 
I was also going to correct a few things here but thought I'd reach out first: the smallest parking area is actually a service road to the middle and SW (currently unmapped) car parks. The convention re. engratnances is for them to go on the buildings and to use barrier=entrance for a gap in the wall as it is here (although it's not common to use).
See the wiki on entrance=* for some guidance
Pipeton (2024-04-11 11:48:45+00:00): Do not turn two buildings into one by making a multipolygon, this is a bad practice.
BaboucheVerte (2024-05-01 16:28:17+00:00): Hi, what was the purpose of your edit ? You deleted right tag and added wrong tag that has the same effect as deleting the object
mcliquid (2024-04-11 09:16:26+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
mcliquid (2024-04-11 09:17:51+00:00): Was it on purpose to edit the Bernt Lorentz GmbH in Henstedt-Ulzburg in Germany? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331092501/history
DCA (2024-04-11 10:47:42+00:00): I think I only changed a road ending on an area or the like, which JOSM showed me as an error
fortera_au (2024-04-11 11:10:48+00:00): You appear to have accidentally removed a node from w331092501, and then added it back in as part of cs149854604
DCA (2024-04-11 11:46:56+00:00): not saying thats impossible...
dmfr (2024-05-03 17:57:54+00:00): Olá! Este"edifício" é na verdade um suporte de uma linha elétrica (torre de média tensão).
mikimapbuilder (2024-04-11 09:57:48+00:00): Building shape was squared off.
TrickyFoxy (2024-04-11 17:49:23+00:00): что за сок?
BCNorwich (2024-04-11 11:07:15+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The whole area as per the outline is the market place. Therefore it's better to tag the area rather than just one point. Also there would be no need to have the name stated/rendered twice.

Regards Bernard.
gscholz (2024-04-23 06:40:52+00:00): Hi Grannymeg,
your recent edits have left behind a big amount of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-35.77814&lat=-8.23598&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
borishag (2024-04-11 10:45:30+00:00): Hallo,

Je hebt zojuist een heleboel belangerijke tags uit de originele node vewijderd. Zou je die terug kunnen zetten?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-17 17:51:40+00:00): Please, read and follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
joost schouppe (2024-04-19 07:51:43+00:00): The user is using a new app that clearly has some unaddressed issues. We at osm.be are in contact with the organizers, and there's a thread on the forum where both the dev and the org are active, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/be/61
App users cannot do anything about the lack of changeset description or tag deletions. They should get changeset comments just like any other user though, but keep in mind their only interaction with the project is through the app, so they are likely to not understand what you ask them. Address these issues and/or further discussion to the organizers (see thread).
tastrax (2024-04-11 11:49:07+00:00): Where is the import plan for this data, who is the owner of this data and does it have a suitable licence for import into OSM?
tastrax (2024-04-11 11:50:46+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
fortera_au (2024-04-11 11:57:53+00:00): This has already been reverted, discussion is occurring at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/renewables-energy-project-source/111664
hoserab (2024-04-11 23:14:58+00:00): Oops, thank you, haha
fortera_au (2024-04-11 10:24:55+00:00): Hi there, you've added a fairly large line as a generator, this seems incorrect, can you please review and fix.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149856682
mce (2024-04-11 15:26:13+00:00): Just having a PR post code does not make a place part of Preston. I think all these changers should be rolled back.
Paul Berry (2024-04-11 16:07:34+00:00): I used the data given on https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/post-towns/PR.html and the advice on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom as a guide to making the changes. I can change these addresses back if you want but be aware that the addr:* tagging is intended to map the *postal* address only and the keys settled on have been reached by consensus. Sometimes this reveals the arbitrary way that Royal Mail assigns postal towns, and other aspects of addresses, which can seem odd. If you want a *locational* address then Nominatim or the query tool handles this, eg the "Enclosing features" for Garstang would be: https://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=53.9016&lon=-2.774 (scroll down in left-hand pane) but its post town (addr:city) is Preston.
mce (2024-04-11 16:27:15+00:00): I won't make an issue of it. I wouldn't want to upset the Post Office at the moment!
Paul Berry (2024-04-15 11:11:53+00:00): Yes, and thanks for your understanding. It's appreciated.
SomeoneElse (2024-04-13 08:31:38+00:00): Hello Papa Rey,
Here you've created a water point in the middle of the sea.  That doesn't look very much like valid data.  If you want to create bookmarks in MAPS.ME please do that; don't add things to OpenStreetMap.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-05-04 11:08:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150874535 where the changeset comment is: Reverting MAPS.ME personal markers - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16017
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-11 10:40:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11809294443

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
d_berger (2024-04-11 12:55:04+00:00): Hi. Eigentlich bis du lange genug dabei, dass du wissen solltest, dass das Abzeichnen aus anderen Kartenwerken nicht in Ordnung ist, ausser es liegt eine schriftliche Freigabe vor. Und angesichts der riesigen kantonalen OGD-Katalogs 'Geolion' ist es auch völlig unnötig von den SBB abzuzeichnen.