piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
somehundred (2025-02-11 17:49:45+00:00): Do you think it is correct to change building names to versions you proposed? There are two companies operating in Latvia: Rimi Baltic and Rimi Latvia. Which one is operating here? If not clear, we could drop "Baltic" and simply name this surrounding commercial area "Rimi".

Generally, the name of the territory is added in the "name" tag of the surrounding land use element; otherwise, if there isn't a name, then the name of the company operating the territory is added. But, no matter what, each case should be evaluated individually. In this case, if it is not clear which company is operating in this territory, I would simply name it "Rimi".

I understand the problem with navigators routing through private access roads. That is something to be concerned about, and it indeed can confuse people. But the problems with how routers are programmed aren't the reason to change actual map data. The map should be as accurate as possible.

OSRM seems the most reliable routing solution. It avoids routing through roads marked with the "access=private" tag. Valhalla and GraphHopper ignore "access=private" values, but all three ignore roads with "access=no". Today another mapper changed access values for roads in Rimi territory. So, after a few weeks, OSRM should start routing accordingly.
HellMap (2025-02-11 18:20:44+00:00): As an option, access=customers is less restrictive than access=private (which is technically less restrictive than access=no). It would be more or less correct if one can enter/park if they have customer "business" here, broadly speaking. I don't personally know the situation on the ground that well to specify this. Also, I don't know if routers actually differentiate/prioritize like that, but at least the data would permit hypothetical navigation.
richlv (2025-02-11 21:18:38+00:00): To understand the usecase better, were there any particular routers that directed to the delivery entrance when navigating to the office?
Specific examples could allow identifying the best solution.
richlv (2025-02-11 21:19:38+00:00): Un noteikti laipni aicināti apspriest detalizēti OSM Latvijas kopienas čatā, https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com :)
somehundred (2025-02-24 11:28:00+00:00): Atliku atpakaļ "name" vērtību pagaidām. Ja izmaiņas autors vēlēsies turpināt šo diskusiju, tad redzēs vai būs kaut kas jāmaina.
grzegorz75jan (2025-02-10 23:38:56+00:00): Och. Dziękuję za tą cenną informację. Lodówka pełna ?
grzegorz75jan (2025-02-10 23:42:44+00:00): Wszyscy zdrowi bo chętnie wpadniemy na parapetówę.
grzegorz75jan (2025-02-11 00:07:26+00:00): A tak poważnie to niezbyt mądre jest chwalić się w takim miejscu gdzie się mieszka. Pod kątem edycyjnym błąd na błędzie. Co to jest https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10724553657 brama czy przejście dla pieszych no i brama na chodniku publicznym ?.. Każda z tych rzeczy powinna być na osobnym węźle i w innym miejscu. Nazwa ulicy jeżeli taka faktycznie istnieje w dwóch wersjach name ?

Proszę trochę doczytać, douczyć się.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

https://youtu.be/xBMIoypkdI4?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5&t=2596 > opisy

https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=info.zverev.ilya.every_door&hl=pl

https://play.google.com/store/search?q=streetcomplete&c=apps&hl=pl
Frank Peng (2026-03-25 22:32:59+00:00): I see that you deleted some service roads and parking aisles in this changeset and remapped them anew, when it's better to just modify the geometry of the existing roads. Modifying the geometry of existing map features instead of deleting them and remapping them anew helps preserve their editing history.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Also, don't remove map features with tags you don't understand or have no meaning to you. Just because you come across map elements with tags that have no meaning to you doesn't automatically mean you should remove them. They may have been added for a specific purpose. I see in this changeset that you deleted a section of service road with the covered=yes tag (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1314787971/history) and mapped a new parking aisle in its place. If you come across a map element with tags that you don't understand or have no meaning to you, then don't delete them. Check the meaning of a tag by clicking on a map feature in the iD editor, scroll to the "Tags" section at the bottom of the left-hand "Edit feature" pane, click on the info icon (the "i" icon) to the right of the tag, and the meaning of the tag will appear below the respective tag. Click on the "View documentation" hyperlink below the respective tag's meaning to see the OSM Wiki article on the tag.
If you think the tag(s) might be junk, then try contacting the mapper who added the tag(s) in question.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_tags_that_you_don't_understand
JanerNaKole (2025-02-11 16:05:54+00:00): usunięcie całego landuse residential?
Sen_3m23 (2025-02-10 23:20:42+00:00): 添加停车区关系
DaveF (2025-02-12 08:04:21+00:00): Please don't remove network:website tags.
ginnyTheCat (2025-02-12 11:22:09+00:00): Ah, thanks. I didn't know network:website is the preferred tag for networkrail website urls. I should've informed myself better.
DaveF (2025-02-12 12:28:53+00:00): It's not.
The rail network is National Rail.
The station operator is Network Rail.
Rogoyski (2025-03-02 16:36:29+00:00): Ten i być może inne zestawy zmian w rejonie Galerii Młociny popsuły szereg elementów mapy i wprowadziły nowe elementy zawierające kolejne błędy. Są to m.in.:
* pourywane chodniki wokół budynku, np. przejście dla pieszych przed głównym wejściem
* błędnie zastosowany obszar pedestrian wewnątrz galerii nakładający się na sklepy
* błędnie zastosowane obszary pedestrian na zewnątrz budynku nakładające się na obszary flowerbed
* ścieżka i granica landuse'u po wschodniej stronie odsunięte gdzieś w stosunku do właściwego położenia
* nieistniejące krawężniki w poprzez DDR przed wejściem głównym

Czy jesteś w skłonny poprawić te błędy? W przeciwnym razie będę je naprawiał sam, ale może to oznaczać częściowe albo nawet całkowite wycofanie Twojego zestawu zmian.
Rogoyski (2025-03-09 19:07:55+00:00): Zgodnie z ostrzeżeniem wybrane zmiany zostały wycofane, także takie, które nie zostały wyżej wymienione.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-26 15:15:35+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12577071206/history has width = 0 that was added in this edit
how something exist and have width=0?
KhalidKashmiri (2025-11-27 00:41:49+00:00): Racja, usunąłem
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-27 14:39:26+00:00): dzięki!
SomeoneElse (2025-02-11 18:02:11+00:00): Not sure if it was this changeset that did it, but a gap has opened up in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8815518#map=16/53.14825/-7.18811 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8797261#map=16/53.14825/-7.18811 here.
b-unicycling (2025-02-12 09:39:26+00:00): fixed, thanks
Валентин Ян (2025-02-16 13:24:27+00:00): Підкажіть, будь ласка, чи давно території пожежної частини, гаражних кооперативів, закладів освіти, ринку... вважаються житловими?
b-jazz (2025-02-12 19:00:39+00:00): Hi Haggardlyforte, 

I've gone ahead and reverted this change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162441660 and wanted to let you know why.

The existing features that you added "golf=fairway" to are part of something called "multipolygons". They combine things like fairways and greens together to indicate that everything that isn't a green/bunker/etc is part of the fairway. To go back and label the piece that defines the "outer" boundary of the multipolygon incorrectly as it says that *everything* within that border is a fairway. Hope this helps. Please let me know if you have any questions.
eggie (2025-02-11 07:08:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Falkons (2025-02-11 19:42:51+00:00): I believe you accidentally named the retail area/parking lot with bus route info?
GeorgeMann1 (2025-02-12 21:07:19+00:00): Whoops my bad
user_8655426 (2025-02-11 01:48:38+00:00): こんにちは。静岡県内の編集、ありがとうございます。
公式サイトの情報をOSMにコピーされていますが、この会社の「拠点一覧」のページはGoogle マップを使用しています。
工場や営業所などの位置情報(座標)は、ここの地図を参考にされたのでしょうか？

プロフィール欄に「現地主義」について書かれていますが、念のため、OSMで利用可能なデータソースや情報収集方法などを、以下のページでご確認ください。

・利用可能なデータソース
https://openstreetmap.jp/node/764

・データの情報源 (著作権のあるデータは使わないでください)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Beginners_Guide_1.1

・JA:よくある質問 (なぜ OpenStreetMap なのか？)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:よくある質問

・Ground truth
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ground_truth

・Whiter than white
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Whiter_than_white
無限の刃 (2025-03-18 04:29:08+00:00): これらは全て、この編集時点でOpenStreetMapにデータが存在しています。私が現地調査していない地物の位置を知る際はOpenStreetMapのデータを拠点名で検索しました。OpenStreetMap上のノードとウェイの履歴を確認してください。
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-11 00:30:44+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 161031082, 161032393, 161032489, 161953189.
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-17 10:41:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162605674, 162605678, 162605680 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from YaaRamis after several requests for respectful changeset comments were ignored
Udarian (2025-02-11 02:47:04+00:00): why did you remove the check_date=* tag, I'm pretty sure it is correct, unless you want to update it to an earlier date when you saw it.
notd3nny (2025-02-11 18:23:21+00:00): The store actually opened now, I'm sorry if that wasn't clear. I removed the construction tag, and I must have removed the check_date by accident. I will update it later.
5m4u9 (2025-02-11 05:07:20+00:00): Hola,

la avenida que cambiaste a vía secundaria no tiene coherencia respecto a toda la zona, el hecho de que sea avenida no le da directa categoría de secundaria, la conectividad tiene mayor prioridad sobre el tipo de vía
angys (2026-01-20 12:56:58+00:00): Hi, I think they bus location for MSC is misplaced, please check
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-17 10:41:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162605674, 162605678, 162605680 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from YaaRamis after several requests for respectful changeset comments were ignored
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-17 10:41:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162605674, 162605678, 162605680 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from YaaRamis after several requests for respectful changeset comments were ignored
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-02-13 10:45:08+00:00): Bu noktayı neden eklediniz? Ankara için zaten şu düğüm mevcut: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/25869410
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-02-13 10:47:16+00:00): Şunu da silmişsiniz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2794078378
keyyushi (2025-07-14 19:25:52+00:00): HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi, bunu ve alttaki değişiklik setini revertlememiz daha doğru olmaz mı? Geçmişi olan nokta silinip tekrar eksik bir şekilde tekrar eklenmiş.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162372484
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-07-16 04:50:35+00:00): @keyyushi. Haklısınız.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-07-16 04:51:05+00:00): @sezar bd. Lütfen geçmişi koruyacak şekilde düzenlemeler yapınız. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Nathan_A_RF (2025-03-13 11:50:44+00:00): Hi, please do not tag roads passing under bridges as tunnels.
Giblet (2025-02-11 16:55:04+00:00): Thanks for cleaning this up!
GOwin (2025-02-11 04:27:19+00:00): Nice work! Thank you, and I hope you keep it up.

In case you're a local, or understand Binisaya or Cebuano, there's an informal group of mappers who keep in touch/learn from each other in this Signal channel: https://signal.group/#CjQKIPDlm3R1kw0QTo7u5fs8m5n9xguwIH1iJqskKLCxAXjVEhApLYZqUlGS32uDl5FqJK0z
GOwin (2025-02-11 07:07:05+00:00): Some suggestions to make these edits better:

Instead of combining the name of the government offices occupying the same building, add those POIs individually.

I know that it's a bit tedious, but when mapped as separate features, it allows other people to find them easily, and can add more details (e.g. contact details,) for each, separately.

If you prefer a "gamified" approach to mapping, and you're on Android, try out StreetComplete:  https://streetcomplete.app
iandees (2025-02-11 03:33:38+00:00): Thanks for working on the map. This was marked with no access for walking because the road itself is not for pedestrians. There are separate lines for the sidewalk, which do allow walking.
ratrun (2025-02-11 18:03:54+00:00): Hi!

The data you added here is of very poor quality as you entered most of the ways multiple times without connecting the end nodes to the other ways. Therefore, it creates a couple of routing errors. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-71.40618&lat=46.83693&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=snap_points%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1%2Cunconnected_open_ends_2%2Cunconnected_open_ends_3%2Cunconnected_open_ends_4%2Cunconnected_open_ends_5%2Cunconnected_open_ends_6

Please rework this edit and improve the data! This is what needs to be done:
- every physical way must be mapped only  once!
- connect the end nodes of the ways to the other ways

thank you
ratrun
MikeN (2025-02-11 13:13:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM!  This looks like  a good representation of the park features.   It looks like there is also a basketball court and walkway connecting to Creekwood Court that could be added.
nullkid11 (2025-02-11 15:50:29+00:00): Indeed there is! I'm not sure if secondary accounts are a good idea for map edits, so I'll add these features once I am able to access that account again (I am not in a place where I can login to my Google account currently). Thanks!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-11 03:22:21+00:00): 162310557, 162304000, 162303980, 162303947, 162303939, 162303903, 162303876, 162303874, 162303863, 162303853, 162303846, 162303835, 162303830, 162303803, 162303788, 162303763, 162303748, 162303731, 162303724, 162303700, 162303670, 162303666, 162303657, 162303641, 162303635, 162302864, 162302855, 162302842, 162302827, 162302823, 162302811, 162302793, 162302779, 162302774, 162302771, 162302763, 162302759, 162302754, 162302749, 162302737, 162302720, 162302709, 162302704, 162302670, 162302651, 162302644, 162302638, 162302636, 162302631, 162302616, 162302611, 162302595, 162302590, 162302585, 162302578, 162302566, 162302544, 162302540, 162302529, 162302519, 162302514, 162302493, 162302487, 162302478, 162302470, 162302451, 162302449, 162302443, 162302428, 162302418, 162302399, 162302396, 162302383, 162302360, 162302354, 162302349, 162302327, 162302326, 162302317, 162302311, 162302286, 162302281, 162302280, 162302274, 162302264, 162302237, 162302192, 162302183, 162302172, 162302150, 162302143, 162302112, 162302110, 162301988, 162301857, 162301815, 162301786
Fizzie-DWG (2025-02-11 09:24:31+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162382269
Fizzie-DWG (2025-02-11 09:27:24+00:00): See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17223
aharvey (2025-02-11 09:22:18+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination

`destination=*` should go on the road you turn into, not the road you turn from, but it only really works when there it's not different from each of the from roads, and even then it's usually for a place not a street (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination:street for that). On the first wiki page you can also see there is destination:lanes which can be set per-lane on the from way.

However there is yet another method (first was destination on the to way, second was destination:lanes on the from way) which is use a relation, which exists here at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10699075/history this can capture more detail about the destination sign.
Caleb NHVR (2025-02-11 23:33:17+00:00): Thanks Andrew, I'll have the look at the wiki links and review it in relation to this junction shortly. Cheers
Glassman (2025-02-11 17:51:04+00:00): There are some issues with your contribution. First, the roads into the farms are usually highway=service. Residential roads are usually maintained by the a local government. 

The footway you added in the farmland next to Shawnee Road look more like highway=track. Ideally they should connect to another road to allow routing. 

Also, the aerodrome you added might be better as an aeroway-runway, which is usually just added as a way.

Please review these edits and fix as needed. Let me know if you need any assistance. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162375441
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-11 08:13:55+00:00): #seo #spam
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
4004 (2025-02-16 22:55:23+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
как правило, велодорожки мапим отдельными линиями, когда они отделены физически, либо хотя бы имеют другое покрытие. судя по снимкам, на этом участке все так же полоска краской просто? поэтому переставил ваши теги на линию тротуара
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-11 21:46:52+00:00): #seo #spam
Fraxi (2025-02-11 08:52:40+00:00): Здравейте! Благодаря Ви за добавянето на тези данни. Коригирах някои от тях в подходящ формат и вид: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162381042

На https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours можете да се запознаете със стандартите на форматиране на работното време. Тук (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage) има пояснения за формата на телефонните номера. Премахнах описанието, защото според https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description#No_advertising това е вид рекламно описание.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 01:27:28+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165050719
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-11 21:48:01+00:00): #seo #spam
mueschel (2025-03-23 16:10:43+00:00): Hi,
these buildings and plots all got very strange 'name' tags. The 'name' tag is only for the actual name of an object, not for a description or to add a label on a map.
Could you have a look and check this?
Totor (2025-02-12 04:35:46+00:00): Hi Gowin,
Your tag is correct, but I usually use shop=agrarian
It is simpler and seems more commonly used:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/shop=agrarian
Also mentioned in the trade tag page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtrade
Someone also suggested shop=animal_feed. That would be more accurate, but is not much used (23 only...).
Cheers,
Totor
kmpoppe (2025-02-11 09:27:53+00:00): Hey gon0,

vielen Dank für deine ersten Updates in OpenStreetMap und Willkommen!

Sehe ich das richtig, dass die Praxis jetzt von Frau Dr. Wortelmann betrieben wird? In diesem Falle könnte/sollte der "operator" noch entfernt werden, da steht nämlich noch der alte Name drin.

Und zu deiner Frage in der Note (die ich jetzt geschlossen habe): es gibt ein "wheelchair"-tag (hauptsächlich mit den Werten yes, no, limited), mit dem sich beschreiben lässt, ob ein Rollstuhl in die Praxis kommt - in diesem Fall, da dort Stufen sind, wäre wheelchair=no der richtige Eintrag.

Möchtest du das selbst mit OrganicMaps anpassen?

Gruß

K
gon0 (2025-02-11 10:32:02+00:00): Moin K,

Danke für die schnellen und hilfreichen Hinweise!

Das ist ja super, dass es das Wheelchair-Tag gibt. 

Ich sehe gerade nur den alten Eintrag und nicht den neuen von Frau Wortelmann. (Ich bin gerade auf dem Sprung). 

Wäre super, wenn Du es anpassen könntest. 

Vielen Dank und viele Grüße,
G
silversurfer83 (2025-02-12 17:26:50+00:00): Hi there :)

any reason why you would delete the name of the hotel?
Alesialisa (2025-02-12 17:37:15+00:00): hi! I did not delete hotel name, it was just one amenity added
silversurfer83 (2025-02-12 17:43:55+00:00): Thanks for the quick reply.

I'm guessing it was an accident then.

The database has you editing this hotel

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1197762608

I'll fix that then.

Happy mapping
Alesialisa (2025-02-12 17:51:04+00:00): Thank you!
dschanz (2025-02-14 09:30:51+00:00): Hallo Rallioz,
die B49 zwischen Moselweiß und Lay ist aktuell noch nicht gesperrt. Die zitierte Webseite ist bisher nur eine Ankündigung. Die Layer Anwohner wurden informiert, dass die Bauarbeiten am 10. März beginnen, und die Straße einige Tage zuvor (ich habe gehört, es sei der 5. März) gesperrt.
Hätte der Eintrag daher nicht noch etwas Zeit? Für OSM-Nutzer sieht es so aus, als sei die Straße bereits jetzt gesperrt.
Gruß dschanz
Rallioz (2025-02-14 11:58:59+00:00): Stimmt, ich habs mal mit access:conditional zeitlich eingrenzt, das ist eh besser. Danke fürs Anmerken
RaphaelPasloin (2025-02-11 11:00:43+00:00): Hello,

It's look like you are doing mechanical edit with a tools made for surveying on the ground.

Even there is no mistake in sence if the information is not previously set you just add sidewalk:side = separate without completing the other part but it's useless as the quest will be asked again for next ground mappers. 

The concern here is also  that your edit is missleading  as you indicated source=survey and it's clearly not the case. If there is a mistake on the data you will not notice it. If the ground situation has changed or there is work ongoing you add incorrect data , for exemple : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30335644 this way has access=no and there is a landuse=construction but you add information on the way (one of the double carriage will be removed soon) that's doesn't help local mappers at all and introduce confusion.

I ask you to stop this kind of edit with a tools that's not made for this.

Have a good day.
Raphaël
s777n (2025-02-16 23:13:25+00:00): Перерисовал
s777n (2025-02-17 12:12:55+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы не соединили нарсиованную вами дорогу с остальной дорожной сетью
KKS (2025-02-11 22:05:11+00:00): 	https://www.elgaucho.com.ua
OneMoreSCAccount (2025-02-12 02:44:08+00:00): Наразі там основна вивіска латинськими літерами. Варіанту, який пропонуєш ти на жаль немає😢, дивись уважніше фото, особливо на першу літеру
OneMoreSCAccount (2025-02-12 02:49:54+00:00): другого слова
KKS (2025-02-13 08:40:04+00:00): Та бачив шо там москальська... але name:uk українською. А name: в Україні має відповідати name:uk. Плюс їх точка на гуглі - українською і в меню українською. Те що вивіска франшизи англійською, то це ж лише вивіска... як "аптека низьких ц.."
s777n (2025-02-17 21:04:36+00:00): Здравствуйте. Ваша правка была удалена. Вы нарисовали дорогу поверх участков и не соединили ее с остальной дорожной сетью
SAFA PHARM (2025-02-11 08:04:45+00:00): شركة الصفاء الاتناج الادوية
eggie (2025-02-11 09:08:21+00:00): Beste afdeling verkeer..
Ik heb de wandelpaden verder aangevuld mbv de BGT.
De wegklasse heb ik omgezet naar highway=footway  Er staan G7 borden vooraan.

MVG
eggie
Tjuro (2025-11-04 06:26:04+00:00): Beste afd verkeer I gemeente Baarn,

Ik zie dat je hier een oppervlak toegevoegd hebt aan het pad, de waarden binnen osm zijn in het engels. Zie deze lijst voor veel voorkomende waardes:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface

Gelieve dit te verbeteren

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
Tjuro (2025-11-04 06:29:53+00:00): Tip check de default access op:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Netherlands