piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Linze G Roku (2026-05-12 10:00:34+00:00): 绿洲小城镇是横梁镇现在的政府驻地 （见 https://www.gulang.gov.cn/art/2020/5/29/art_10998_731123.html ）        
而横梁、干城、新堡三镇在第七次人口普查中的人口小于1000人（虽然这是由当时人口搬迁地没有纳入行政辖区而导致的异常值），所以我们不设置以它们为名的聚落，而是仅设置关系（也是可以有 place=subdistrict 的 label 的）。    
关于回退的变更集，我们高度怀疑他使用了未知来源的错误行政界线，所以我们进行了回退。并且，我们已经根据古浪县县志编纂办公室《古浪年鉴 2025》及其附图进行了**边界的更改**，将移民区域也划入三镇的行政范围。    
**截止目前，我们仍然尚未收到他用于此次编辑的底图或者划界方案。**           
最后，我们必须说明：我们注意到了甘肃省民政厅《关于武威等3市部分乡级行政区划代码的公告》，并会对甘肃省境内由于本次撤乡设镇所更改的行政区划进行调整。    
对于被回退编辑集的青海部分，只能请他自行恢复。
Herman Lee (2026-05-12 12:54:49+00:00): 我认为，首先对于中国大陆有建制的镇、乡、街道，不应因其人口数量，或者有无聚落（很明显，此例具有聚落）而取消其label的point，关系是一方面，除部分特殊情况外（如虚拟社区），建议还是将所有乡镇保持点要素与关系要素，并将此点放置于其政府所在地或几何中心或标志地。
依照引用的原文和目前的情况，横梁镇政府目前是位于绿洲小城镇内，由此可以看出，无关乎绿洲小城镇是否是行政村级，至少其等级低于乡镇级别，而此区域含有6个社区服务中心，说明其级别高于社区，若是具有管理与统筹作用，是高于行政村级别，不应使用
admin_level=8，可采用
admin_level=9，若无使用其他地名标签如locality。
user_22174723 (2026-05-12 13:17:32+00:00): 贸然撤回编辑，为了那些来源不明的却将明显有来源确认已变化的部分删除可不是一个好举措，这种已经叫做破坏了，已经将你删除的部分给退回。OSM是一个社区协作平台，您应当先私信沟通好再做行动，或者仅撤回您觉得有问题的部分。
bpiotrowicz86 (2026-05-17 11:03:15+00:00): Dzień dobry.
Sprawdziłem dziś poprawność edycji w terenie i drogi dla rowerów nie ma. Są natomiast chodniki. Proszę o uważne edycje.
eigenval (2026-05-18 07:02:43+00:00): W dniu, kiedy to oznaczyłem, na drodze rowerowej nie było barierek i jechał nią rowerzysta. Wczoraj widziałem, że faktycznie, barierki wróciły. Być może wtedy było tymczasowo otwarte, bo prowadzone były prace.
bpiotrowicz86 (2026-05-18 07:44:29+00:00): Jest Pan pewien, że mówimy o tym konkretnym odcinku drogi? Przejeżdżam tamtędy co tydzień i budowa tego odcinka jest odroczona do czasu budowy ronda. Na zachodnim końcu jest barykada, a za nią asfalt się kończy, na wschodnim droga zaczyna się na drodze poprzecznej. Pomiędzy nie ma odcinka drogi dla rowerów - proszę spojrzeć na wybudowane chodniki z odnogami przygotowanymi do przecięcia drogi dla rowerów, ale kończące się ślepo, ponieważ drogi nie ma. Prawdą jest, że wiele rowerzystów na tym odcinku decyduje się na jazdę po chodniku na brakującym odcinku, może to wprowadziło w błąd?
eigenval (2026-05-18 07:59:52+00:00): Prawdopodobnie oznaczyłem zły odcinek, w takim razie - widziałem rowerzystę wjeżdżającego na drogę przy końcu Cynamonowej i jadącego w stronę Lanciego, ale głowy nie dam czy dalej jechał w stronę ronda Krahelskiej. Sorry za zamieszanie.
bpiotrowicz86 (2026-05-18 09:49:10+00:00): Tam jest kawalątek drogi od Cynamonowej do okolic lanciego, potem się urywa właśnie i brakuje odcinka do krahelskiej. Nic się nie stało, proszę się nie martwić, może trochę zbyt szorstkim językiem się wypowiadałem, ale nic się nie stało:)
już zaktualizowałem tagi z construction na proposed, więc nie powinno się pokazywać już w streetcomplete.
fs_LT (2026-05-28 04:30:11+00:00): if there are no restrictions we don't need explicit access-tags on highway=residential because, in absence of signs saying otherwise, all traffic is allowed (check the wiki for default values in Germany).

If there is a sign, tag it correctly otherwise plz revert.
Luzandro (2026-05-28 11:03:06+00:00): There are no highway=residential in this CS. For driveways on private property it’s not wrong to add access=private, although it doesn’t really make a difference in this case since they’re dead ends anyway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182497441
Ltrlg (2026-05-11 17:59:15+00:00): Sur la séquence Panoramax, ça a l’air de concerner également way/1441589737, non ?
mw014 (2026-05-11 22:15:42+00:00): En effet ! c'est modifié merci
Ltrlg (2026-05-12 07:53:36+00:00): Super, merci !
silversurfer83 (2026-05-11 18:20:26+00:00): Hi :)

ein Teil der Wege sieht auf dem DTM Hillshade Hintergrund sehr nach "ordentlichen" Waldwegen aus, die auch von zweispurigen Fahrzeugen genutzt werden können.
Wenn es Beschilderung gibt, die hier bestimmte Verkehrsarten einschränkt, dann kann dies über accees=* dargestellt werden. Ein highway=footway ist in DE aber üblicherweise mit einem Verkehrszeichen 239 ausgeschildert.  Das halte ich im Wald für unwahrscheinlich. Sollte es also wirklich ein schmaler Weg sein, der nicht mit zweispurigen Fz. genutzt werden kann, dann ist highway=path naheliegender.

Wenn du da Fragen hast, dann bitte immer raus damit. 

Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182497973
Niederpruem (2026-05-11 20:51:06+00:00): Ah, ok, verstehe, der Waldweg ist natürlich nicht mit einem runden, blauen Verkehrszeichen versehen. Habe ich wieder geändert. Mir war nur wichtig, das Fußgänger hier eine Zugangsberechtigung haben.
silversurfer83 (2026-05-12 03:23:51+00:00): Verstehe.

Wenn du eine weile durch die verschiedenen Wiki-Artikel unter access=* liest, dann wirst du rausfinden, dass Fußgänger quasi immer erlaubt sind außer auf ein paar speziellen Wegtypen. Daher muss auf highway=track auch *kein* explizites foot=yes gesetzt werden.

Wenn du aber jetzt im Wald aus einem track einen footway machst, dann verhinderst du damit, dass dort Forstwirtschaft entlang darf.
eggie (2026-05-11 08:00:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Je info samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
woodpeck (2026-05-11 09:13:28+00:00): Dear user nikolaymapper, the building outlines you have uploaded here are clearly *not* directly derived from ESRI imagery. Please specify the data source of these building outlines. In the future please always specify the correct data source when uploading data.
nikolaymapper (2026-05-18 14:45:42+00:00): Hello, woodpeck. I outlined some buildings according to Mapbox aerial imagery. Sorry for the mistake and thank you for the notification.
ajmat (2026-05-12 09:07:24+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 182544356
eggie (2026-05-11 08:12:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback.. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Robert Whittaker (2026-06-04 13:51:09+00:00): Hi,

In this changeset you removed some of the tags on the Sainsbury's petrol station shop mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066882214 . 

Since you left some of the other tags, I'm wondering if this was a accidental mistake. I've added back the removed tags for now. But if you did mean to remove them (e.g. because the shop is no longer there) then please remove them again (along with any other tags that no longer apply) or let me know and I'll sort it out for you.
Udarian (2026-05-12 02:52:33+00:00): I have already asked the Meta team to not complete these MapRoulette tasks in this area as it is within the area of a separate OSMUS tasking manager project and thus can cause issue with that https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 . I have been actively working on that project and going through and closing MapRoulette tasks in the area so please refrain from completing them in this area.

Happy mapping,
Udar
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-11 09:13:08+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1245893393
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1245893601

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Udarian (2026-05-12 03:00:26+00:00): I have already asked the Meta team to not complete these MapRoulette tasks in this area as it is within the area of a separate OSMUS tasking manager project and thus can cause issue with that https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 . I have been actively working on that project and going through and closing MapRoulette tasks in the area so please refrain from completing them in this area.

Happy mapping,
Udar
Hung Tran 9x0 (2026-06-15 09:54:11+00:00): Sao bạn sửa tên đúng thành sai thế? Chỉ tạo chỉnh sửa cho đủ KPI thôi à? Trước đây chính tôi đã đi vào đây rồi mới chỉnh sửa, mà nay quay lại thì thấy tên bị viết sai như thế này đây.
Hung Tran 9x0 (2026-06-15 10:05:45+00:00): Bạn nên viết thứ tự từ ngõ 27 vào trong thì mới đúng và dễ tìm trên ứng dụng bản đồ.
eggie (2026-05-11 09:15:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

I merged your info with the present addressnode.

Greetz,
eggie
trial (2026-06-15 09:52:02+00:00): Bonjour, les adresses ne se positionnent pas sur les bâtiments mais à la limite de la voirie publique.
De plus addr:city et addr:postcode n'ont pas d'intérêt : ils sont déduits de la position de l'adresse.
Udarian (2026-05-12 03:01:42+00:00): I have already asked the Meta team to not complete these MapRoulette tasks in this area as it is within the area of a separate OSMUS tasking manager project and thus can cause issue with that https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 . I have been actively working on that project and going through and closing MapRoulette tasks in the area so please refrain from completing them in this area.

Happy mapping,
Udar
PedestrianMapping_GeoMasker (2026-05-12 03:35:11+00:00): Hi Udarian, Thanks for the clarification and for coordinating the work in this area. We’ll avoid tasks in this region and leave them for the ongoing project you’re managing.
 
Appreciate your efforts, and happy mapping!
trial (2026-06-15 09:48:27+00:00): Bonjour, merci d'annuler : l'adresse était correctement placée en limite public/privé.
trial (2026-06-15 09:49:17+00:00): L'adresse correcte est ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5879895860
Tatfahren (2026-05-11 10:49:04+00:00): Was ist deine Quelle für das geplante Gebäude? Du hast leider keine im changeset oder am Gebäude angegeben.
4b696d (2026-05-11 14:59:39+00:00): Da steht ein Schild, dass da etwas gebaut wird. Das Gebäude habe ich grob abgeschätzt.
Udarian (2026-05-12 03:06:42+00:00): I have already asked the Meta team to not complete these MapRoulette tasks in this area as it is within the area of a separate OSMUS tasking manager project and thus can cause issue with that https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 . I have been actively working on that project and going through and closing MapRoulette tasks in the area so please refrain from completing them in this area.

Happy mapping,
Udar
Udarian (2026-05-12 03:13:00+00:00): I have already asked the Meta team to not complete these MapRoulette tasks in this area as it is within the area of a separate OSMUS tasking manager project and thus can cause issue with that https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 . I have been actively working on that project and going through and closing MapRoulette tasks in the area so please refrain from completing them in this area.

Happy mapping,
Udar
lankapuhelin (2026-05-13 12:49:37+00:00): Briefly, it's because the name should be simply K-Market and the branch (in this case Kypärämäki) should be tagged with branch= tag
MappingMore (2026-05-12 10:47:23+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:182548488
Udarian (2026-05-12 03:14:57+00:00): I have already asked the Meta team to not complete these MapRoulette tasks in this area as it is within the area of a separate OSMUS tasking manager project and thus can cause issue with that https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 . I have been actively working on that project and going through and closing MapRoulette tasks in the area so please refrain from completing them in this area.

Happy mapping,
Udar
Udarian (2026-05-12 03:18:51+00:00): I have already asked the Meta team to not complete these MapRoulette tasks in this area as it is within the area of a separate OSMUS tasking manager project and thus can cause issue with that https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 . I have been actively working on that project and going through and closing MapRoulette tasks in the area so please refrain from completing them in this area.

Happy mapping,
Udar
Znaika (2026-05-11 19:51:08+00:00): Hi, es geht nicht darum, ob die Straße offiziell benannt ist. Es geht darum, ob sie schon existiert oder erst nur im Bau (construction, was ich vorher gesetzt habe), befahrbar oder nicht, begehbar oder nicht. Bitte um Klärung!
BCNorwich (2026-05-13 06:25:36+00:00): Hi, I've removed several sections of duplicated highways that you somehow mapped. Please try not to place a highway on top of an existing highway; this duplication could disrupt routing.

Regards Bernard.
Shuja Ahmed Butt (2026-05-13 09:44:43+00:00): Thank you for correcting really appreciate you reviewed my edits. I’ll be careful next time.

Could you let me know which specific highways or sections you corrected? I’d like to review them so I can understand the mistake better and improve my mapping.
BCNorwich (2026-05-13 13:34:34+00:00): https://photos.google.com/photo/AF1QipOEl7gULIsVUGqxZou6x5JY6sECv2Dj-T0tTM3J   
Screenshot of problems, blue triangles are duplicated highway sections.

You can also see them for the next few hours here:- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=74.18045&lat=32.15780&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

Regards Bernard

PS Changesets like this with 86 features are hard to find a specific feature. Thus OSM advice is ti limit a changeset to less than 20 features.
Shuja Ahmed Butt (2026-05-13 14:56:44+00:00): Got it. I will take care of this next time.

Regards Shuja Ahmed
FajrAl (2026-05-12 07:55:12+00:00): dipulihkan dalam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182542006
FajrAl (2026-05-12 07:53:40+00:00): tambahkan tag source=
FajrAl (2026-06-21 04:10:41+00:00): perubahan ini telah dipulihkan
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-13 08:37:42+00:00): Reverted SEO spam POI with advertising/nonsensical tags added with explicit source=* of Google Maps in violation of OSM policy and potentially copyright and contract law, in changeset 184046297

https://osm.org/changeset/184046297
Udarian (2026-05-12 03:22:43+00:00): I have already asked the Meta team to not complete these MapRoulette tasks in this area as it is within the area of a separate OSMUS tasking manager project and thus can cause issue with that https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 . I have been actively working on that project and going through and closing MapRoulette tasks in the area so please refrain from completing them in this area.

Happy mapping,
Udar
PedestrianMapping_TraceHop (2026-05-12 03:32:17+00:00): Hi Udarian, Thanks for the heads-up and for coordinating the work in this area. We appreciate the clarification & we’ll avoid working on tasks in this region and leave them for the ongoing project you’re actively managing.
Thanks again for your efforts and happy mapping!
YomanNH (2026-05-11 12:47:38+00:00): Hej, jeśli te drogi uznajemy za nie-łącznice, to czy w takim razie na rondzie też nie powinno być highway=primary?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-11 13:18:39+00:00): którym rondzie?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-11 13:19:30+00:00): jeśli chodzi o takie skróty na rondzie pomijające skrzyżowanie i tarczę ronda to ich tutaj nie ma na tym
YomanNH (2026-05-11 13:25:12+00:00): Rondo Piekarza Ochwata nie powinno być całe jako primary, analogicznie jak to jest np. na Rondzie Kocmyrzowskim? Na moją intuicję tak by wynikało, jeśli nie traktujemy dróg na poziomie zero jako łącznic.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-11 14:44:22+00:00): łącznica może być na poziomie zero, tyle że tutaj nie jest to wcale łącznica IMHO
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-11 14:45:00+00:00): a, widzę o co z primary chodzi

EW powinny być, poprawię
SomeoneElse (2026-05-16 13:24:06+00:00): Hello,
A few things have obviously gone very wrong in the vicinity of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13817503042/history .  These include:
* pavement crosses building
* pavement diagonally crosses kerb way (unlikely)
* gaps created in route relations (I've fixed those here)
SomeoneElse (2026-05-16 13:35:12+00:00): To investigate the "what should be where" problems, I'd definitely recommend an on-the-ground survey.  If your bosses are unwilling to bankroll that, then you might instead try looking for appropriately licenced photographs on e.g. Geograph or Mapillary.
Also please use OSM UK's Cadastral parcels for alignment - that will indicate a number of problems and help you fix them.
Finally - do raise problems you find in the UK forum - people _will_ help you!
Nirmala03 (2026-05-18 05:59:57+00:00): Thank you for your valuable feedback and for fixing the relation breakage from your end. Please note that Uvasree has currently paused contributing to OSM edits, who made this edit. We will check on building and kerbway allignment using avaialble sources. We will check on posibilities to use JOSM validator for relations breakage going forward.
VJMK (2026-05-11 17:26:07+00:00): Obiekt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1455751183 jest po prostu zadaszoną sceną (https://maps.app.goo.gl/BydCR7S8qwtb2vu67), więc zdawało mi się, że leisure=bandstand covered=yes w zupełności wystarczy. Wg wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:theatre:type%3Damphi) theatre:type=amphi można stosować dla okrągłych lub owalnych obiektów przypominających stadion, więc w tym przypadku nie byłby odpowiedni nawet dla całości (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1455751189) bo to tylko wycinek koła.
andrzej-pl (2026-05-11 18:00:28+00:00): Znaczy, że większość obiektów tego typu jest źle oznaczana. 35 lat żyłem obok i dopiero się dowiedziałem, że amfiteatr nie jest amfiteatrem, a zadaszoną sceną.
andrzej-pl (2026-05-11 18:02:31+00:00): Dla świętego spokoju - przeedytowałem to z powrotem na estradę.
hatul (2026-05-20 12:17:07+00:00): שלום,
מחקת בטעות את היחס של שביל ישראל בקטע הבא. בבקשה להיזהר.
dellared (2026-05-11 15:30:54+00:00): Ciao, se la barriera è "temporanea" (credo solo per una stagione a giudicare dalle ortofoto) ma il passaggio è ad uso privato, sarebbe più corretto rimuovere la barriera e mettere accesso privato direttamente alla strada
Ivan Stella (2026-05-11 18:13:54+00:00): Ciao, per quanto riguarda la barriera (recinto elettrico) potrebbe durare il tempo di una stagione (fino a novembre) oppure potrebbe rimanere così com'è (ma senza elettricità) in vista della stagione successiva. Per prudenza l'ho lasciato così, se dovesse cambiare la situazione aggiornerò la mappa senz'altro
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 13:29:27+00:00): Reverted (re-)adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values

https://osm.org/changeset/184914299
MappingMore (2026-05-12 11:25:28+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:182549942
empty_child (2026-05-13 07:01:11+00:00): Hello
I think you meant "shop=outpost" instead of "amenity=marketplace." A marketplace is a whole amenity around, not a single shop. An outpost is a small point for outgoing orders from the online shop
eggie (2026-05-11 10:42:46+00:00): Dag rt  Wanneer oneway=no is getagd dan kan oneway:bicycle=no weg.
Dat is niet meer van toepassing.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=182504349

MVG
eggie
IvaKraljić (2026-05-16 18:50:27+00:00): The tagged way has since been shortened in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182755691. #OptimoRoute
eggie (2026-05-11 10:44:22+00:00): Dag rt  Bijna altijd zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van oneway=yes

Is dat hier ook zo. Dan toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no en evt ook voor moped en mofa.

Het routeert anders niet meer voor tweewielers.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-05-11 10:51:12+00:00): Uitzonderingen toegevoegd
rt0801 (2026-05-11 13:48:39+00:00): Hi eggie,

Dank voor het toevoegen van de uitzonderingen. Dit is hier inderdaad ook zo.
Wildsharky (2026-05-13 06:44:53+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:182580490
eggie (2026-05-11 10:45:33+00:00): Geldt hier een uitzondering voor tweewielers.
Graag reactie.

MVG,
eggie
rt0801 (2026-05-11 13:53:45+00:00): Die geldt hier inderdaad. Ik heb het aangepast.
eggie (2026-05-11 14:53:19+00:00): 👍
lakedistrict (2026-05-18 11:23:51+00:00): Hi, thanks for this edit and your recent/ongoing mapping around Barrow :)

You have added a few hotels but without any POI tagging, only building= tagging. building=hotel indicates a building originally designed or constructed as a hotel, but does not tell us its current use. If the hotels are still in use, then tourism=hotel is also required. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=hotel?uselang=en-GB

Thanks :)
a-sav (2026-05-19 14:21:31+00:00): Thank you, added these tags!
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-13 14:03:23+00:00): Partly revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181174474
Marildv (2026-05-15 06:22:58+00:00): Hello, pitscheplatsch! Thank you for adding additional information to my comment. Sincerely, Maryia.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182504840
Wildsharky (2026-05-12 11:27:33+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:182537054
0000FF berries (2026-06-09 21:25:17+00:00): Hello :) 

Thank you for editing OpenStreetMap at Corfu :) 

I'm one of the Greek volunteers and writing this message because you have added to your changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182505414 "review requested". You have created a point with some information: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13817629288  Thank you. I looked at the OSM wiki, and it seems that the recommended way to map landslides is as areas: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dlandslide So, if you remember approximately how big the landslide was, I would suggest removing the node, and replacing it with an area with the tag natural=landslide, together with the description (maybe change it to "description:en: as it is in English) and the elevation tags. 

Hope this helps. Feel free to reach out for any questions. You could also ask on the forum for Greece: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/gr/68 

Thanks again for improving OSM data in Greece :)
Nyx_Amer (2026-05-19 14:24:26+00:00): Bonjour, il semblerait que vous ayez changé la forêt en réserve naturelle. Est-ce une erreur ? Cela fait un trou un peu bizarre sur la carte qui ne rend plus compte de la présence d'une forêt ici.
ajmat (2026-05-12 09:42:48+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 182545804
ika-chan! (2026-05-11 17:46:06+00:00): While the new roundabout is correct, the filter road at way/1512038018 did not exist. Please only add corner filter roads that physically exist, as in those separated by a kerb or hatched area.
Wildsharky (2026-05-13 06:41:58+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:182579785
Wildsharky (2026-05-12 11:31:12+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:182539765
GerdP (2026-06-25 08:36:13+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Ich wundere mich gerade über die von Dir erfassten landuse=grass Flächen wie https://www.osm.org/way/1512054263
Warum verwendest Du da nicht landuse=meadow?
sauerland-radfahrer (2026-06-25 12:12:42+00:00): Hallo,
ja, du hast Recht. meadow wäre angebrachter.
Viele Grüße
SekeRob (2026-05-11 11:50:33+00:00): Notably, this road is in Bing referred to as Via C. Totaro in Località San Silvestro, and by some other as Via San Silvestro. The C. is for Carlo. The Via Carlo Totaro is actually signed at the beginning/bottom of the road in Silvi where Bing gives it the same name.
Bienson (2026-05-12 06:28:48+00:00): Also auch kein leerstehendes Ladenlokal mehr hier, da komplett gelöscht und nicht als geschlossen markiert?
linuxuser1 (2026-05-12 07:41:41+00:00): Das Gelände ist leergeräumt, das Gebäude steht noch, es sieht aber nicht so aus, als wenn hier demnächst wieder ein Handel eröffnen würde, sogar die alte Fassadenverkleidung wurde entfernt.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-11 20:45:10+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302604758

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-11 20:54:38+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302604758

Pozdrawiam! 🦀