piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
YomanNH (2024-02-29 23:23:23+00:00): Cześć,

czy zmieniło się oznakowanie w terenie, że te drogi:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206206147
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/269229077
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/269233540
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/608721683
oznaczyłeś jako highway=cycleway?

Na pewno nie nazywają się one "Wiślana Trasa Rowerowa - Małopolskie". Informacja o tym, że jest to fragment Wiślanej Trasy Rowerowej jest w relacji https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7343678/
Benoît C MdP (2024-03-05 08:38:04+00:00): Bonjour Tronald,

Pour info, dans OSM, les bandes cyclables sont portée par la voie principale. Donc pas besoin de créer un way séparé pour la bande de la rue de la Grange aux Belles.

J'ai corrigé.

Bonne continuation.

Benoît
Britzz (2025-04-22 14:19:30+00:00): Bonjour Tronald, deux remarques concernant ce changeset :
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4716077 ajouté par erreur, ce n'est pas grave, juste pour vous avertir, c'est corrigé par suppression
* vous mentionnez comme source de données "streetlevel imagery", attention, si vous avez utilisé GoogleStreetView ce n'est pas une source de données autorisée (cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Malaysia)
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-05-03 22:24:40+00:00): Hi, it makes little sense to have these two 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1256031933
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11737303
as separate features.
mikaeldui (2024-05-18 19:30:36+00:00): @qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq it seems mine is drawn more correctly according to the Forestry background. Also using "natural" instead of "landcover".

Feel free to do as you like.
mikaeldui (2024-08-30 17:40:48+00:00): @qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq so, which one do you prefer?
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-08-30 18:03:23+00:00): Personally I prefer natural=wood as it's better supported by data consumers. Last time I checked landcover received a lot criticism and I'm not sure the whole community is ready to accept it.

 It won't hurt if booth tagging schemes would be on the same polygon.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-29 14:30:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11676786735
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11676786736

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
HirschKauz (2025-07-31 21:00:31+00:00): Hi! 
kann es sein, dass Du die Büros nach einer Liste einträgst? 
schau mal hier: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4878272

PS: 'phone' ist für eine Mobilnummer nicht korrekt, besser ist mobile - und noch besser ist contact:mobile=+49123456789 

Kollegiale Grüße
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-29 14:30:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7389482549

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2024-04-17 17:04:23+00:00): Gude mein Lieber :)

bin eben in einem anderen CS über diesen Node von dir gestolpert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11676771044

Meines Wissens nach gibt es keine Filialen der Deutschen Post mehr (angeblich noch eine einzige in Bonn, Nostalgie und so) und alles andere sind durch Dritte betriebene Shops die halt Dienstleistungen für die Post erbringen. Dafür wurde dann mal das "post_office=post_partner" eingeführt
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:post_office%3Dpost_partner

Nur so als Hinweis für die Zukunft :)

happy mapping
silversurfer83
wies1 (2024-04-18 05:26:52+00:00): Hallo,
danke für Deinen Hinweis.

Mir war nicht bewusst, dass es so gut wie keine eigenen Postfilialen mehr gibt - ich wusste schon, dass es immer weniger werden, aber so wenige - das war nicht bekannt.

Ich habe gerade überlegt, was damals war. Mir ging es um Anschriften. Ich glaube, die Angaben, die am Node sind, waren zuvor am Gesamtgebäude dran und ich denke, dass ich die einfach vom Gebäude selbst auf den Node übertragen hatte, möglicherweise unter Vervollständigung der Adressdaten. Dies zur Erläuterung.

Viele Grüsse

wies1
Hashmush (2024-05-12 18:48:03+00:00): Hej! Jag såg att du hade ändrat badplatsen vid Trollsjön till leisure=sports_centre + sport=swimming. 

Det är lite oklart exakt hur våra svenska badplatser ska taggas, men jag har försökt hålla mig till förslaget från 02JanDal som går att hitta här: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/clarification-on-the-mapping-of-bathing-places/105017

Anyway, sports_centre är inte riktigt rätt :)
Frans S (2024-03-02 14:01:32+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
It is difficult to identify buildings here. 
No shadow means mostly No Building.
Shadow on the in - and outside of an object: No building, mostly  a fenced livestock
Buildings not squared.
Buildings overlooked.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148056053
Minh Nguyen (2024-02-29 18:57:50+00:00): This changeset is being discussed on the forum:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-strip-malls-buildings/109813/12
CurlingMan13 (2025-05-15 00:34:23+00:00): Looks like you forgot to reopen the Westfield Blvd bridge when you tagged it as construction.  I readded the road tag.

As a note, if you are going to map a temporary closure, it is requested (and expected) that you stay on top of it and update it promptly when it reopens.
mueschel (2024-03-03 14:09:02+00:00): Hi,
could you check the tags you added here and on other objects? All tags should be in English, but these are not:
technique = Esgrafiado
thematic = Historia

Maybe "theme=history" is a proper replacement for the second one.
Inetman (2024-03-04 08:42:57+00:00): Откуда информация, что трамвай пойдёт по Мичуринской? Насколько я помню, в проекте — Зорге.
Lepidobatrachus (2024-03-25 20:15:39+00:00): Действительно, за седьмым микрорайоном планируется депо: https://rostov.aif.ru/auto/v_rostove_utverdili_shemu_tramvaynoy_seti_v_levencovke Выдумывать трассировку путей это уже вандализм
wbrt (2024-03-07 08:01:12+00:00): deze beperkingen lopen door richting noorden in de paardenstraat tot kruispunt met de egenhovenstraat,
daar staat het andere bijhorende bord
wbrt (2024-03-07 08:06:17+00:00): (het kan zijn dat dit al is ingevoerd)
queerthoughts (2024-03-08 17:41:54+00:00): Was inderdaad al ingevoerd door iemand anders (zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4142037), maar toch bedankt voor de comment, want die persoon was één segment vergeten.
DD1GJ (2024-02-29 15:43:32+00:00): Hallo Lilly8098,

willkommen bei OSM. Für was brauchst du diese Grenze? Sie ist in diesem Bereich wohl identisch mit der Landesgrenze zwischen Bayern und Sachsen, welche bereits mit sehr hoher Genauigkeit bei OSM vorhanden ist: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166224120#map=14/50.3299/12.0626

Zudem Hattest Du Die Grenze als Pfad eingetragen, was in dieser Form total falsch ist und unzählige Fehlermeldungen ausgelöst hat. 

Ich habe daher diesen Änderungssatz vollständig zurückgesetzt.
Wunjo Aydınlatma (2024-02-29 15:29:32+00:00): Evet Burası JustFit20 Adlı İşletmedir.
Norbert Dichter (2024-03-01 16:41:44+00:00): Concerning TASK 795 in
#15736: Missing Maps: Homa Bay county, Kenya (3)

Hi, @Asta_Asendia , I just checked in to this task and found your buildings are a bit strange. 

Please use the Q key, to set right angles. Thank you.

"In iD: draw an area and label it as Building, then correct for right angles with the Q key. In JOSM: draw an area and use the tag building=yes, then correct for right angles using the Q key - OR use the building plugin. Most buildings are rectangular so make buildings rectangular even if a shadow, tree or roof pitch make it appear otherwise."
eggie (2024-02-29 16:17:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback   Een pad dat is afgesloten kun je inderdaad op access=no zetten. Dit moet wel aangegeven staan dmv een bord of er 'moet' een hek staan.
Je hebt het pad wel per abuis denk verschoven.
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-02-29 16:19:50+00:00): Je edits  Ik heb het pad weer teruggelegd.
Mapse
eggie
guillemmal (2024-02-29 20:28:39+00:00): Estimado, el camino a La Hoya debe ser tertiary, no se llega a ningún centro poblado por el mismo. Razón por la cual no debe ser secondary.
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-09 17:05:58+00:00): The map looks good. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148058918
Frans S (2024-02-29 16:58:45+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info) On this task you mapped a round building.
A close look shows a round yard, without a roof, probably to hold livestock


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148060180
lyctkel (2025-10-24 20:13:15+00:00): Hi Thibtib51,
at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11337865194 you wrote recycling:waste=plastic;paper.
That looks unusual. recycling:waste=yes 
would have been expected.
Did this mean that paper and plastic are collected separately in a trash can?
I often see trash cans like this in the Netherlands.
In this case, 
waste=paper;plastic 
would be more appropriate.
Best regards,
lyctkel
Thibtib51 (2025-10-25 11:35:50+00:00): Hi Lyctkel, 
You're right and I change it. Thank you for your help :).
Best Regards,
Thibtib51
CurlingMan13 (2024-02-29 19:55:12+00:00): When mapping landcovers, please do not partially overlap them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148060874
Chris Denomy (2024-03-01 17:48:21+00:00): ok, got it.
Frans S (2024-02-29 17:02:06+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
please do not connect buildings to each other with the nodes.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148061314
Frans S (2024-02-29 16:52:15+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148061327
Frans S (2024-02-29 17:04:28+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148061456
Frans S (2024-02-29 16:59:25+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
A remark.  There are also rectangular buildings which can be mapped.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148061596
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-01 15:24:16+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11677398743/history has pk = 43.400 that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
michel60 (2024-05-02 21:28:04+00:00): Hi,
Pk is the kilometric point which gives the position of the radar. This is what allows the radar to be referenced. It's certainly not standard but it's the only way I found to reference it.
Then I use the following link to view the speed cameras:
- http://frink.bplaced.de/blitzer/#map=16/48.7492/2.8565
P.S. Wait a few seconds for it to be displayed.
By clicking on it, you can see the different directions and the speed limit.
It would be nice to keep "pk" and its value
Thanks in advance
Michel
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-24 07:04:52+00:00): "Pk is the kilometric point" = why pk, not kp?

And in general, I would advise to document such keys on OSM Wiki (or use more self-descriptive ones)

Note: someone more trigger happy removed it since then
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-24 07:06:53+00:00): BTW, I also have seen km key used in seemingly the same way (maybe there is a difference?)
michel60 (2025-04-24 07:45:42+00:00): Hi , this is the reference of the kilometric point on the road.
See https://www.radars-auto.com/emplacements/seine-et-marne/la-houssaye-en-brie/4503-radar-autonome-d1036/#:~:text=Le%20radar%20autonome%20est%20install%C3%A9,par%20un%20panneau%20radar%20sp%C3%A9cifique.
This is the only way to reference a radar. Its position on the road
Frans S (2024-03-08 13:59:37+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148062507
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-09 14:34:01+00:00): It looks good. Well mapped. #OMGuru
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148062580
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-09 14:33:24+00:00): It looks good. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148062590
Soshal Distan Singh (2024-02-29 21:48:22+00:00): Добрый день. Не забывайте про пробелы в номерах домов. Пожалуйста, изучите: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Адреса#Нумерация_домов
Heinz_V (2024-03-01 08:36:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
Your changeset comment are really strange. Please us meaningful description.
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-03 20:03:33+00:00): Я на спутниковом снимке отчётливо вижу здание. Зачем вы удалили здание?
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-09 14:31:56+00:00): It looks good. Well mapped. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148062985
literan (2024-03-01 09:56:46+00:00): Этих станций давно нет. Вы опять вносите фейковые объекты, не существующие на местности
mstrbrid (2025-07-20 17:39:41+00:00): Did you mean to tag this way as derelict too? Don't want to delete it if so:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1256124288
letsridebikes (2025-07-20 17:49:12+00:00): Hello, I didn't, that's still in use for access to that side of the pontoon from memory
mstrbrid (2025-07-20 21:48:14+00:00): That feels like a misuse of the primary tag waterway= to me. I've not come across ways being effectively used as sat-nav routes or marine parking aisles. Have you got any examples you've followed?
Looking at it again, there's probably an argument for moving the other waterway=canal to historic:waterway too as it no longer exists as a canal, only a marina "parking aisle".
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-09 14:29:48+00:00): It looks good. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148063532
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-09 14:16:09+00:00): The map looks fine. #OMGuru #youthmappersatbsmrmu
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148063748
silversurfer83 (2024-03-01 15:30:47+00:00): Grüße in die Unistadt :)

kleiner Tip: Für einzelne Stufen ist https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dstep vielleicht die bessere Wahl. Soll aber nur ein freundlicher Vorschlag sein

Happy Mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148063779
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-09 14:14:37+00:00): It looks good. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148064011
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-09 14:13:06+00:00): I can see only a node near the waterway. Either it was deleted or removed. Need to resolve it. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148064087
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-09 14:09:02+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. All looks good. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148064121
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-09 14:07:41+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. All looks good. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148064263
Frans S (2024-03-11 11:14:05+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped. Buildings are rectangular or round. No triangle !


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148064284
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-09 14:06:05+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. All looks good. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148064346
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-09 14:03:57+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. All looks good. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148064421
Xvtn (2024-03-01 16:35:45+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks good to me, no complaints! Regarding dangerous crossings, I don't know of any way to tag that, and I found this reddit thread [0] where people seem to agree, unfortunately. There is also this obsoleted tagging proposal that's related. [1] So in summary it seems like sadly there is no way to represent this in OSM right now. Thanks for your contributions!

[0] https://old.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/12p3nee/dangerous_pedestrian_crossing/
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Hazard_warning
Jetrost (2024-03-02 18:46:59+00:00): Thanks for the helpful info! Learned more about routing engines than I expected. :)
Dren ar Frankig (2024-02-29 18:10:14+00:00): The size of the changeset is due to France being a transcontinental state!!
Mashin (2024-02-29 22:01:44+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
The current agreement is to place school names only the whole school-ground area, but not on the building itself as that would create duplicates when searching objects by name.

Cheers
amapman (2024-03-01 00:10:47+00:00): Thank you Mashin! Good to know.
citrula (2024-03-01 05:34:41+00:00): I fixed the access tags based on your description. access=no means that no traffic is allowed at all (even foot traffic)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148065001
CurlingMan13 (2024-02-29 19:51:26+00:00): Instead of mapping each individual tree as a woods/forest, you should add a node if it is not in a cluster.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148065015
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-09 14:01:51+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. All looks good. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148065084
PlayGuide (2024-03-11 07:26:52+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai vu que dans ce changeset, vous avez remplacé le node/6402933444 portant le tag leisure=playground par le way/1256139429 portant le tag landuse=recreation_ground ? Est ce que ça veut bien dire que les modules de jeux ont disparu ? Sinon, il faudrait rétablir le tag leisure qui est bien plus spécifique d'une aire de jeux pour enfants.