piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JeffH (2023-12-22 08:34:33+00:00): Hi Do you have local knowledge? There is absolutely no indication of active quarrying or mining in the area as far as I can see from visits, and the local rangers say such activities stopped quite a few years ago. If you want to keep the features, then I suggest adding "abandoned=yes"
KwaXoloXolo (2023-12-22 12:40:05+00:00): My view is diggings and old mines don't go away just because they are no longer active. Happy to mark them as abandoned though.  You will notice that that area is very rich geologically - not only mica, but feldspar and emeralds too. Even SA's only mercury mine is in that those parts. All abandoned now, but still visible in the landscape to the educated eye.
Tilia_J (2023-03-19 15:49:05+00:00): Ook deze wijziging teruggedraaid, zie vorige bericht
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
Nutn0n (2023-03-24 16:56:24+00:00): ส้นตีนจัญไรว่างมากก็เอาเวลาไปดูแลพ่อมึงไม่ให้ตายจมของขี้ตัวเองในบ้านพักคนชราโทรม ๆ เพราะรัฐบาลห่วย ๆ
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
Tilia_J (2023-03-19 15:31:06+00:00): Goedemorgen, ik heb je wijziging teruggedraaid aangezien ik de opheffing een maand geleden al correct heb doorgevoerd.

Dit heb ik gedaan door voor highway=track de "abandoned" prefix te zetten: abandoned:highway=track 

Op deze manier houden we de historie in stand, wordt het pad niet meer op de kaart getoond én voorkomen we dat zogenoemde armchairmappers dit pad weer gaan toevoegen.
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:18:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:16:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:16:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
SekeRob (2023-03-19 09:58:39+00:00): Pescara, read Nora U-bend is no more.
ualios (2023-03-21 09:56:38+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. Il parco va taggato su un'area, non sul nodo. Se possibile meglio indicare un nome specifico 
Come riferimento puoi dare un'occhiata qui:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161308890
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:16:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:16:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
user_177389 (2023-03-19 10:27:57+00:00): Don't you want to understand that you're doing something wrong?
Nakaner (2025-09-16 13:08:30+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe den Änderungssatz soeben revertiert. Die AVG-Strecke wird vom Albtalbahnhof ab Signal 1ZR3, 1ZR4 und 1ZR5 Richtung Süden nach EBO betrieben (bis Battstraße Fahren auf Sicht ohne Hauptsignale). Sie verfügt durchgehend über einen unabhängigen Bahnkörper. Daher sind die Bedingungen, die railway=tram*_crossing rechtfertigen würden, nicht gegeben. Wären die Gleise in der Fahrbahn, wäre das etwas anderes.

Viele Grüße

Michale
B-Rabbit (2025-09-17 17:48:28+00:00): Hallo,
danke für die Korrektur.
Ist die Strecke dann als light_rail richtig?

Die Hardtbahn ist ab Haus Bethlehem nach Norden ja auch eine EBO-Strecke und bis zur Welschneureuter Straße als light_rail eingetragen, danach bis Linkenheim Friedrichstraße als rail. Ist hier der einzige Unterschied von was die Strecke befahren wird?
Nakaner (2025-09-17 22:18:56+00:00): Hallo,

die Grenze EBO/BOStrab ist in Neureut mittlerweile an den Abzweig Welschneureuter Straße verlegt worden. Da gibt es auch Signaltafeln dafür.

In beiden Fälle (Welschneureuter Straße–Haus Bethlehem und Albtalbahnhof–Ettlingen-Erbprinz) ist nur ein Lichtraumprofil nach BOStrab gegeben. Deswegen wurde da railway=light_rail verwendet. Die komplette Frage, wann welchen Wert man für railway=* verwendet, nämlich tram, light_rail, subway oder train ist vor ca. 10 Jahren ausgiebig diskutiert worden.

Hier mal eine kleine Auswahl:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/railway-light-rail/69578 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/koln-stadtbahn-opnv-aufraumen-verbessern-aktualisieren/75083 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dusseldorf-neuss-railway-tram-light-rail-subway/77080 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dusseldorf-neuss-railway-tram-light-rail-subway/77080

Bei railway=light_rail ist es vertretbar, dass die Strecke nach EBO betrieben wird (siehe Rheinufer- und Vorgebirgsbahn), während das bei railway=tram schon sehr schräg wäre.

Wir können das gerne ausführlicher im Forum diskutieren, denn das dürfte mehr als nur uns beide interessieren.

Viele Grüße

Michael
B-Rabbit (2025-09-18 17:47:03+00:00): Hi,

Super, vielen Dank für die Klarstellung.
Diskussionsbedarf habe ich keinen, da folge ich einfach den Experten bzw. den Definitionen im Wiki :)
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
pesec (2023-03-20 07:57:19+00:00): Вашу бы энергию да в плодотворное русло...
Вместо бестолковой расстановки дат проверки отрисовали бы дома в паре кварталов по Интернациональной.
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:16:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-24 05:36:42+00:00): Favor observar que os dados não podem ser copiados do Bing Maps. Graeme Fitzpatrick, Grupo de Trabalho de Dados OSMF

Please note that data cannot be copied from Bing Maps. Graeme Fitzpatrick, OSMF Data Working Group
rogeriocs (2023-03-24 12:45:59+00:00): Olá, Bom dia! Desculpe mais as informações estão erradas ? Minha irmã mora proxima ao local, á 22 anos,  e foi ela quem me orientou sobre o sentido e o nomes corretos da rua Avelino de Santana ! A rua Doutor José Peroba está localizada em outro local completamente diferente ! Sei que sou novo no OpenStreetMaps, erro as vezes nas Tags e outros detalhes tecnicos, mais minha intenção é de contribuir! Agradeço a sua orientação mais acredito que não cometi nenhum erro! Grato, Rogerio
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-25 01:59:59+00:00): Olá Rogerio. Obrigado por isso. Não há nenhum argumento de que o nome da rua está errado, apenas que você disse que copiou do Bing Maps, o que não é permitido! Se você acrescentar o nome e disser que é de uma Pesquisa, ou Conhecimento Local, ninguém terá nenhuma preocupação!

Hi Rogerio. Thanks for that. There's no argument that the street name is wrong, it's just that you said you copied it from Bing Maps, which isn't allowed! If you add the name & say it's from a Survey, or Local Knowledge, nobody will have any concerns!
user_18721979 (2023-03-25 05:27:55+00:00): Olá amigo, Obrigado pela dica !
rogeriocs (2023-03-25 05:45:52+00:00): Valeu também Fizzie41 pela orientação, pensei que era apenas o Google Maps! Sabe se tem algum outro navegador que eu pode usar como arientação para aerofotogrametria ? Novamente grato pela ajuda e pelo bom conselho, Rogerio

Also thanks Fizzie41 for the guidance, I thought it was just Google Maps! Do you know if there is any other browser that I can use as guidance for aerial photogrammetry? Thank you again for your help and good advice, Rogerio
rogeriocs (2023-03-25 05:48:03+00:00): *orientação
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-25 05:50:54+00:00): Desde que você fique com as imagens aéreas disponíveis na iD, você ficará bem!

As long as you stick with the aerial imagery available in iD, you'll be fine!
CoyKoi (2023-03-20 01:32:47+00:00): This should be tagged leisure=swimming_pool. See this example at a neighbouring property: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/614528341
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133851212
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-03-19 11:44:16+00:00): Please don't blindly ignore warnings.
It's very hard to find things you broke after you've uploaded them
Here you can see for yourself that the road is broken
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5919256005

Here a parking multipolygon got broken, it's not closed on the building's side
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6902397

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Don't you think that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155390146 looks a bit close to the cycleway? I think that having one way for bicycles and pedestrians was better there.

And here you drew footway on top of the red bicycle way
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/987191896
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-03-19 11:47:42+00:00): This looks like a mistake
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119157966
dgmapping (2023-03-19 16:43:20+00:00): Another issue I noticed - cycleway 1155390144 is not routable from one end.

qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq, maybe you can answer, what is the best way to connect node 10744861718 to the rest of the road network:

a) connect the end directly to Pärnu mnt
b) connect it to the footway network and make sure the section that crosses the Pärnu mnt until way 987191893 is routable/has bicycle=yes tag?
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-03-19 19:09:23+00:00): I've merged those ways back. In this place pedestrians and cyclists compete for space all the time anyway. Also added a service road. Now routers which prefer common use roads will use Pärnu mnt and routers which are ok with a bit of walking can use footways there.

This bicycle road actually makes more sense if you route from Estonia theater to Mere pst as there is a bike lane from that direction. Not really sure you're allow to cycle in Tammsaare park. This should be validated.
dgmapping (2023-03-19 19:48:01+00:00): qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq, thanks! The service road 1155605661 solves the routing issue.
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:16:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
SomeoneElse (2023-03-19 13:51:10+00:00): Hello
Just mentioning in case you're still half-way through fixing it - there's an extra spur at http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=6473828 that has appeared (like caused by whatever your fixing here rather than this changeset)
Cheers,
Andy
rskedgell (2023-03-19 14:15:41+00:00): Hi Andy,

Thanks for spotting it. It should now be fixed, along with a couple of short gaps.

Rob
SomeoneElse (2023-03-19 23:58:46+00:00): Great - thanks!
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:16:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
zorglubu (2023-03-19 12:40:34+00:00): Bonjour,

L'extrémité ouest du Sentier des Halles était connectée au contour du parking Place des Loisirs. Je me suis permis de faire la connexion avec la voie de service.
Cordialement.
PhiCouton (2023-03-19 14:45:36+00:00): C'est mieux comme ça, merci !
Cordialement
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
map per (2023-03-20 18:47:47+00:00): Concerning "review requested": Looks good, thanks!
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:18:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:18:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-19 13:38:45+00:00): Edycja wycofana za import z brakiem podanego źródła i prawdopodobny brak przejrzenia patrz też https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133854961
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-19 13:38:43+00:00): Edycja wycofana za import z brakiem podanego źródła i prawdopodobny brak przejrzenia patrz też https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133854961
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-19 13:38:41+00:00): Edycja wycofana za import z brakiem podanego źródła i prawdopodobny brak przejrzenia patrz też https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133854961
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-19 13:38:39+00:00): Edycja wycofana za import z brakiem podanego źródła i prawdopodobny brak przejrzenia patrz też https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133854961
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-25 15:46:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134108394 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism and creating fake objects with nonsense names at random places.
user_5359 (2023-03-23 12:23:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1sN7. What is the meaning of the tag Paddy = Yes?
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-20 19:06:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133911345 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert on user request (Ticket#2023032010000145)
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-20 19:06:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133911345 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert on user request (Ticket#2023032010000145)
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-20 19:06:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133911345 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert on user request (Ticket#2023032010000145)
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-20 19:06:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133911345 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert on user request (Ticket#2023032010000145)
jejo mo (2023-03-19 11:30:35+00:00): revisar esta rotonda y se supone que dos mas que iba a hacer en a avenida 302 y 304 con avenida constitució
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:16:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-20 19:06:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133911345 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert on user request (Ticket#2023032010000145)
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:18:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-20 19:06:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133911345 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert on user request (Ticket#2023032010000145)
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-20 19:06:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133911345 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert on user request (Ticket#2023032010000145)
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-19 13:38:37+00:00): Edycja wycofana za import z brakiem podanego źródła i prawdopodobny brak przejrzenia patrz też https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133854961
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:16:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-20 19:06:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133911345 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert on user request (Ticket#2023032010000145)
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:17:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-04 12:38:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134494165 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7021
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-20 07:02:56+00:00): Czy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155400810 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155400811 na pewno istnieją?

Kiedy zostały zbudowane i skąd o nich wiesz?
NieWnen (2023-03-20 08:57:51+00:00): Wycofane (133888499)
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-19 13:38:35+00:00): Edycja wycofana za import z brakiem podanego źródła i prawdopodobny brak przejrzenia patrz też https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133854961
Langlaeufer (2023-03-19 15:25:08+00:00): Hallo Reinhard,
keine Manöverkritik:
wenn da ein richtiger (egal ob benutzungspflichtiger) Radweg ist, dann ist bicycle=designated und foot=designated
die Eigenschaften des Radweges werden mit cycleway:* (nicht bicycle:*)beschrieben. Die Eigenschaften des Gehweges mit sidewalk:* (nicht foot:*)
Und die an der Straße beschriebenen Rad und Fußwegattribute ändern -> cycleway/sidewalk:both=separate
Gruß Frank
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133853537
Langlaeufer (2023-03-19 15:29:27+00:00): Ausfahrten und Bahnübergänge verbinden nicht vergessen (hab ich gerade nachgeholt)
ist die Südseite wirklich ein getrennter Radweg? Ich habe da bisher überhaupt keinen erkannt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133853537
rohieb (2023-07-06 13:47:46+00:00): Moin :-) Das Industriegebiet (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107104475) ist dabei irgendwie aufgespalten worden, ich hab es in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138189496 mal wieder zusammengenäht, damit es ein geschlossener Pfad ist und gerendert wird.
tracker51 (2023-07-06 22:21:43+00:00): Hi,

danke für die Reparatur. Könntest Du für mich bitte erläutern, was da schiefgelaufen ist, damit das in ähnlichen Fällen nicht mehr passiert? Vielen Dank!
rohieb (2023-07-07 08:48:41+00:00): Gute Frage… ich hab Potlatch leider noch nie benutzt, von daher weiß ich auch nicht, wie die UI dort aussieht oder ob vllt ein falscher Button gedrückt wurde, der die Geometrie des Industriegebiets in zwei (nun nicht mehr geschlossene Geometrien) aufgetrennt hat…?

Ich war mir auch erst nicht komplett sicher, was du mit dem Changeset bezwecken wolltest, da dein Kommentar eher die Quelle als die Absicht beschrieb – ich hätte vermutlich eher etwas wie "Radwege hinzugefügt" geschrieben. Mehr zu guten Changeset-Kommentaren findest du im Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Langlaeufer (2023-07-07 09:35:42+00:00): Hallo Tracker,

vielleicht nochmal in anderen Worten. Du hast vermutlich versehentlich die Umringlinie des Industriegebietes in zwei Linien aufgespalten (Die Linie in einem Punkt geteilt) . Damit ist es keine Geschlossene Linie mehr sondern zwei offenen und somit kein Fläche.
Ich denke dass kann passieren, und ist nun ja auch berichtigt.
Grüße
GeoMechain_repair (2023-03-21 06:16:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133924970 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert vandalism
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-19 13:38:33+00:00): Edycja wycofana za import z brakiem podanego źródła i prawdopodobny brak przejrzenia patrz też https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133854961
Patchanka (2023-03-20 13:41:24+00:00): bonjour
est-ce fait exprès d'avoir supprimé la ligne de navette fluviale "Taxlupa" ?
Elle existe toujours il me semble ?
Patchanka (2023-03-21 17:02:54+00:00): j'ai restauré la ligne Txalupa.
Bonne soirée
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-20 19:06:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133911345 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert on user request (Ticket#2023032010000145)
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-25 15:46:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134108394 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism and creating fake objects with nonsense names at random places.
SpinOff (2024-03-02 23:32:58+00:00): Wycofałem tę zmianę. highway=track to nie drogi dojazdowe

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148149929
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-19 13:38:31+00:00): Edycja wycofana za import z brakiem podanego źródła i prawdopodobny brak przejrzenia patrz też https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133854961
Tetryk (2023-03-20 06:41:16+00:00): Dużo roboty zostawiłeś z relacjami i tagowaniem jezdni. Może lepiej by było dokonywać zmiany mniejszymi porcjami za to dokładniej.
SzymonH (2023-03-20 07:39:21+00:00): I znów zostawiłeś dziury w relacjach transportu publicznego...
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-19 13:38:29+00:00): Edycja wycofana za import z brakiem podanego źródła i prawdopodobny brak przejrzenia patrz też https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133854961
Frans S (2023-03-21 17:23:05+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Mappings not accurate and squared.
Connecting nodes to other features.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133853888
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-20 19:06:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133911345 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert on user request (Ticket#2023032010000145)
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-19 13:35:25+00:00): Edycja wycofana za import z brakiem podanego źródła i prawdopodobny brak przejrzenia

patrz też https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133854961