piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
birimkulova (2026-07-22 05:47:21+00:00): Thank you for the comment. I’ve fixed it.
Loopslol7 (2026-06-29 16:32:13+00:00): Hi! Just want to say thank you for editing in this area!
Orozcu (2026-07-23 23:05:16+00:00): esta muy mal hecho ese limiete, galerazamba no pertenece a Atlántico, favor corregir los limites como estaban anteriormente.
Wildsharky (2026-06-30 09:27:03+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184840929
alpacaMaps (2026-07-25 04:45:40+00:00): This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.

If these cameras are real, please let us know so the map stays accurate. Otherwise, we'd kindly ask that you avoid adding cameras that aren't actually there, and that you remove any temporary or test nodes once you're done.

If this was simply a mistake, no problem at all — just clean up the nodes that don't correspond to a real-world camera, and leave a quick note here so we can help.

Thanks for helping keep OpenStreetMap accurate.

— alpacaMaps
Bienson (2026-06-29 08:53:15+00:00): Wenn ein Laden geschlossen wurde, bitte als POI stehen lassen und mit disused-Prefix taggen (z.B. als disused:shop=* oder auch shop=vacant). Jedenfalls solange das leerstehende Ladenlokal noch existiert.
Bienson (2026-06-29 08:54:20+00:00): In diesem Fall ist es ja anscheinend sogar bereits nicht mehr leerstehend und ein Friseur ist jetzt stattdessen dort ansässig.
Bloomenwease (2026-06-29 09:03:21+00:00): Ist wiederhergestellt und jetzt als geschlossen markiert. Es gibt dort zwei Friseure nebeneinander. Die genauen Daten habe ich nicht im Kopf - wenn ich das nächste Mal vorbeigehe, trage ich beides ein.
Marcos Dione (2026-06-29 10:36:19+00:00): Hola. Gracias por el aporte. Lo único que sí, el `open_hours` tiene un formato especial, ah;i lo corrijo.

Yo uso https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ para generar el texto que va bien.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184778252
Frans S (2026-06-30 12:39:34+00:00): Hello. A New mapper. Welcome.
A few remarks. 
Default tagging for buildings is building=yes.
PLease do not cluster buildings but map them individually.
be aware that hi-rise bukdings need to be mapped over their roof and placed on their footprint.

How to map high and high-rise buidings
https://youtu.be/u31wPYWkm3E?si=lDbvDutpUyZWQXXL

Best regards
Frans S (2026-07-03 10:54:17+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not cluster groups of buildings. Default tagging of buildings is building=yes.
Best regards
ajmat (2026-07-01 10:41:33+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184906661
WalkingWiki (2026-06-29 07:01:30+00:00): Added > Edited Outline*
Marcos Dione (2026-06-29 10:41:44+00:00): Hola. Borré esta copia porque lo habías puesto dos veces. Tené en cuenta que la base de datos se actualiza inmediatamente, pero las imágenes del mapa no; toma algunos minutos o a veces horas, dependiendo de la carga.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184779371
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-06-30 06:19:19+00:00): Merhaba. Gerçekte var olan şeyleri sildiğinizi söylüyorsunuz. Yaptığınız OpenStreetMap'in ilkelerine aykırı. OpenStreetMap'e eklenen bilgilerde esas olan, bilginin gerçeğe uygun olmasıdır. Yeryüzünde ne varsa onun eklenmesidir. Doğrulanabilir olmasıdır. Esas olan herhangi bir devletin mevzuatı değildir. Sizin değişikliğiniz ise söylediğinize göre gerçeğe aykırı.

Lütfen bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ground_truth

OpenStreetMap Türkiye Telegram grubundaki, 30 Temmuz 2025 tarihli mesajları ve devamındaki mesajları okursanız DWG'nin sizin yaptığınız gibi bir değişikliği geri aldığının örneğini de bulabilirsiniz. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001899945 'in geçmişinde de görebilirsiniz.

Siz kanuna uymak istiyorsanız çizmeyebilirsiniz. Ama başkalarının çizdiklerini silmek size düşmez.

İyi günler.
Edip Dincer (2026-06-30 06:30:57+00:00): Uyarınız için teşekkür ederim.
Supaplex (2026-06-30 09:09:14+00:00): Place a block: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20883

We received a report that you are massively removing features in military area, which is not ok by OpenStreetMap rule: on the ground truth

FYI: osm.wiki/Good_practice#Map_what’s_on_the_ground osm.wiki/Ground_truth

We will place block on your account. If you have any thing to say, email us at data@osmfoundation.org with the title included “Ticket#2026063010000321”

– Auto translation by Google Translate–

Merhaba Edip Dincer

Askeri bölgelerdeki özelliklerin büyük ölçüde kaldırıldığına dair bir rapor aldık, bu OpenStreetMap kuralına aykırı: gerçek durum

Bilginize: osm.wiki/Good_practice#Map_what’s_on_the_ground osm.wiki/Ground_truth

Hesabınıza bloke koyacağız. Söylemek istediğiniz bir şey varsa, “Ticket#2026063010000321” başlığıyla data@osmfoundation.org adresine e-posta gönderin.

Dennis Raylin Chen, Data Working Group, OpenStreetMap Foundation

data@osmfoundation.org [Ticket#2026063010000321]
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184779592
Equalizer379 (2026-07-01 01:29:53+00:00): The petrol station paths are incorrect, it is a single one way path going in from street 34
Eslam_Elsayed (2026-07-01 07:46:06+00:00): Hello Equalizer379,

Thank you for reaching out.

I edited the petrol station paths based on more recent imagery for this area (Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub, dated 2026-06-08.

Could you please provide us with the source you used?
Regards,
Eslam_Elsayed
Equalizer379 (2026-07-01 23:53:58+00:00): Salam Eslam,

I am a regular at that petrol station. there are actually two paths from road 34 - one in and one out - as I have mapped previously.

last I've passed by the place on 2026-06-28. I could take some pictures next time I visit if that helps?
Eslam_Elsayed (2026-07-02 06:37:15+00:00): Hello Equalizer379,

Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap in Bahrain, and for your time and cooperation.

Best regards,
Eslam_Elsayed
Equalizer379 (2026-07-02 17:51:07+00:00): I have updated the paths to more accurately represent the station.

my changeset has been uploaded: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184991052

Thank you Eslam and #digitalegypt for your contributions
Tatfahren (2026-06-29 17:05:13+00:00): Wurde die Beschilderung hier geändert? Ich hatte die Zugangsberechtigung vor 2 Monaten schonmal auf Basis des Bildes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5256356 korrigiert.
Frans S (2026-07-02 11:42:50+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. A new mapper. Welcome.
About your mappings.
Rectangular buildings need to be squared. You can do this by selecting the building and press the Q key,
Best regards
Senihtu (2026-06-30 07:19:49+00:00): Guten Morgen!
Ich bin immer noch der Meinung, daß service=driveway nicht verwendet werden sollte, wenn da ein Linienbus langfährt.
Way 26441318 ,Way 44194217  
mappende Grüße
Senihtu
Gino-52 (2026-06-30 14:23:42+00:00): Ich war nur auf die Parkplätze fixiert.
Wenn Dir der service=driveway nicht gefällt kannst Du ihn gern wieder löschen.
Viele Grüße
Gino-52
karaga (2026-06-29 11:01:39+00:00): Hi,
it would be good if you could also revert change set 184591287

thx
Nakaner (2026-06-30 11:47:41+00:00): done (yesterday)
tubeless (2026-07-09 05:49:38+00:00): Kalo motor_vehicles=yes, berarti truk kontener atau tronton gandeng boleh lewat di jalan H. Bonar donk?
f_husni (2026-07-09 06:21:15+00:00): Halo mas, itu kan di changset nya malah saya hapus tag motor_vehicle=yes nya?
yelisey90 (2026-07-14 17:14:14+00:00): Please check these ways
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196887178
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1533454109
It's unlikely that they duplicate each other like that, and also they should have the same access tags
DDD丶Samuel (2026-07-26 13:31:04+00:00): 您好，线路所节点请单独放置在道岔分歧附近或信号楼的位置，不要和道岔节点重合！
wuys (2026-07-02 03:49:27+00:00): 请在name标签只填入铁路标准名称，不要加入任何后缀，感谢您的贡献！
CR500AF_ETO (2026-07-02 08:12:08+00:00): 此段为京港高速铁路标准名称，以示此区段为中国江西九江九江站至中国江西南昌何家线路所区段，并非用户捏造官方名称。
wuys (2026-07-03 07:18:44+00:00): 您好，请您阅读https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:OpenRailwayMap/Tagging_in_China
以了解铁路命名填写的标准。此线路的标准名称为京港高速线，任何后缀都是多余而无必要的。
soliMM (2026-06-29 12:46:54+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted in: 184793162

Please be more careful not to accidentally drag nodes across half a city when you are panning the map. You have dragged several buildings, which caused plenty issues.
yelisey90 (2026-07-14 17:18:02+00:00): reverted - there's definitely a garage visible at the back side of no. 18 that form a narrow passage, if you open NAPR imagery. A road cannot go like that

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185731191
soliMM (2026-06-29 12:41:49+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted in changeset: 184793687

Please be more careful, not to deleted data that is correct.
soliMM (2026-06-29 12:43:16+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted in: 184793399

Please be more careful, in order to not delete or ruin valid data.
user_5359 (2026-06-30 12:45:03+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1533459161. What is the mean of the tag 
aera = railway_corridor
?
Nakaner (2026-06-29 08:40:48+00:00): Per E-Mail wurde mir auf Nachfrage mitgeteilt, dass die Herabstufung rechtskräftig geworden ist.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-06-30 01:40:02+00:00): hi! Please do not change number of lanes when there is a transition. Please read the wiki about palcement=transition, with width:lanes:start/end. I will revert.
sbedwal_Lyft (2026-07-01 04:10:30+00:00): Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ,
My name is Santosh & I am the mapper on the OSM team at Lyft.Apologies for the mistake, and thanks for pointing this out. I’ll review the wiki guidance on placement=transition and the correct usage of width:lanes:start/end to better understand the expected approach.I’ll also share this learning with the team to help ensure we follow the correct approach in similar cases going forward. Appreciate you reverting the change and providing the clarification. 

Thank you for your contribution to OSM!


Regards,
Santosh
Bloomenwease (2026-06-30 06:42:21+00:00): Warum hast du die Anschrift entfernt? Buschmühle 3 ist die Adresse der Verwaltung, siehe https://www.dortmund.de/themen/freizeit-und-kultur/parks-seen-und-zoo/westfalenpark/
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-29 17:18:30+00:00): You inexplicably removed the valid addr:country=AT tag and changed the existing addr:city=Wien and addr:street=Garnisongasse  tags to invalid values, which doesn't match any surrounding addresses. In addition, name=* should be the common name of the place as used by people, without superfluous company descriptors that can go in operator=* (or official_name=*).

I cleaned up the malformed tagging and damage to the existing tags for the POI in changeset 184808085

https://osm.org/changeset/184808085
DwarfNebula_ (2026-06-29 18:26:13+00:00): Als ik de lucht- en straatbeelden bekijk staat er op de linkerbaan een pijl rechtdoor en op de rechterbaan een pijl rechtdoor en rechts. Ook staat er een bord dat je alleen rechtdoor en rechts mag.

Je hebt nu de rechtsaf van de turn:lanes afgehaald. Dat lijkt mij sowieso onjuist. Heb jij recentere beelden die dit bevestigen? Dat het niet toegestaan is om naar links te gaan betekend natuurlijk niet dat het niet fysiek kan. Daar zou jullie software rekening mee moeten houden.
DwarfNebula_ (2026-06-29 18:28:07+00:00): Eventueel zou op de restrictie relatie except=emergency getagd kunnen worden. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:except
DwarfNebula_ (2026-06-29 18:40:15+00:00): Ah zie dat ik net naar de verkeerde way keek. Je hebt alleen toegevoegd dat er een turn:lane naar links is. Echter zou dit stukje weg op deze manier uit 3 lanes moeten bestaan. | <- deze scheidt de diverse lanes. ; <- deze moet gebruikt worden voor 2+ richtingen in dezelfde lane.
VRU_JeroenS (2026-06-29 19:49:39+00:00): die kruising is helemaal anders. ik heb luchtfoto beschikbaar maar dat lukt me niet om allemaal aan te passen.
DwarfNebula_ (2026-06-29 20:16:59+00:00): Als ik de luchtfoto van 30 april https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.10518,5.091926,20/?datastrip=20260430_SVNEO-01&sensorname=SuperView-NEO
vergelijk met de HR luchtfoto van 7 april https://fsn1.your-objectstorage.com/hwh-ortho/AUX/viewer/index.html?flight=HRL&year=2026&style=RGB&label=1&x=134790.38485&y=457476.53383&z=14.98613&r=0
Zie ik geen verschillen. Ik kan mij ook niet herinneren dat hier gewerkt is sinds deze luchtbeelden.
DwarfNebula_ (2026-06-29 20:17:33+00:00): Overigens als je de luchtfoto kan delen van de situatie zoals die nu is kan ik best helpen met aanpassen :)
Marvk (2026-07-01 00:00:43+00:00): Hi ellen und willkommen auf OSM!

Ein kleiner Tipp für dich: Wenn du im iD Editor (Der Editor, den du für diesen Edit genutzt hast) ein Feature auswählst und Q drückst, bzw. auf das Feature rechts klickst und das Symbol, das wie ein Quadrat aussieht, auswählst, dann wird das Feature ge-"squared", also alle Ecken zu 90°-Ecken gemacht. Das ist hilfreich bei Features wie Gebäuden oder, wie in diesem Fall, Sportplätzen, die meist Rechteckig sind. 

Beste Grüße
Marv
no details provided here (2026-07-01 07:47:41+00:00): Thanks for doing this and making some valuable changes. Good work. But I can see some semi detached houses near me which have now been tagged as terraced.  Can I help with anything in 'my' patch?
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-01 11:17:19+00:00): Thanks for pointing that out, I have done a second pass and fixed the ones I saw here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184908277

I guess the longer term aim, once the false positives are gone, is to then be able to go through all building=terrace and split them into individual houses
no details provided here (2026-07-01 12:52:00+00:00): You're doing terrific work, thank you for doing such valuable gatekeeping and management at a level I can only dream of.  It's appreciated.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-29 17:23:48+00:00): parking_space=* makes no sense on a POI, and even if it did a number makes no sense as its value, and even if *it* did arbitrary free-text would still make no sense.

If you want to tag parking, tag it as a separate feature https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Parking

I removed the nonsensical use of parking_space=* in changeset 184808455

https://osm.org/changeset/184808455
Digitaleo (2026-07-09 13:03:37+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour cette mise à jour de la fiche Inter Caves (Saint-Cyr-l'École). Le passage du site web vers la page dédiée du magasin (https://www.intercaves.fr/saint-cyr-lecole) est une très bonne chose, c'est plus précis pour les visiteurs.

Un petit point cependant sur l'adresse : l'ajout des tags addr:* fait désormais doublon avec l'adresse déjà présente en contact:* (contact:housenumber, contact:street, contact:postcode, contact:city). L'adresse se retrouve donc renseignée deux fois, avec en prime une casse différente entre les deux ("Rue du Docteur Vaillant" en addr, "Rue Du Docteur Vaillant" en contact).

Comme addr:* est le standard OSM pour l'adresse postale, le mieux serait de retirer les sous-tags d'adresse en contact:* (contact:housenumber / street / postcode / city) et de ne garder que les addr:*. Les autres tags contact:* (téléphone, email, réseaux sociaux) restent eux tout à fait pertinents.

Merci !
Xavier Grand-Louis (2026-07-09 14:27:44+00:00): C'est fait. Merci de ce retour.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-29 17:30:07+00:00): You incorrectly retagging a sizable city apartment building as "industrial" and entirely occupied by an advertising agency POI, which seems highly implausible to say the least. Furthermore, you did so with a source of Google Maps which is prohibited by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google )

Therefore, I was required to entirely revert this change in changeset 184808685 . If you want to add it back, you must not use Google as a source for any of the information, and it should be tagged as a separate POI on a node (with valid tags; phone number format is invalid) rather than on the entire building (the former of which is the convention anyway here).

https://osm.org/changeset/184808685
Supaplex030 (2026-06-29 18:26:53+00:00): Hallo Janö987,

vielen Dank für deine Beiträge hier in Neukölln und nachträglich noch einmal herzlich Willkommen bei OSM!

Hier hast du die Oberfläche des Weges vor der Lise-Meitner-Schule angepasst (von Betonpflaster zu Asphalt). Ich habe die Änderung rückgängig gemacht, da dieses Wegstück über den "Schulhof" tätsächlich gepflastert ist, im Gegensatz zu den Abschnitten davor und danach (siehe hier: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=905683650031136).

Falls das ein Missverständnis ist oder sich vielleicht sogar baulich etwas verändert hat, was auf dem Bild noch nicht zu sehen ist, sag gern nochmal Bescheid.

Ansonsten wünsche ich dir weiterhin viel Spaß bei OSM – falls du Fragen hast oder sonst irgendwelche Unterstützung brauchst, kannst du dich gern an mich oder andere aus der OSM-Community wenden!

Happy Mapping und beste Grüße
Alex
yelisey90 (2026-07-14 17:31:25+00:00): reverted - there is no road like that

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185731990
yelisey90 (2026-07-14 17:31:47+00:00): you can check the map here: https://www.livelox.com/Viewer/Open-SOC-Championship-Day-1/W21?classId=1123236&live=false&tab=player
Elizen (2026-07-23 11:10:47+00:00): Hello. Why is there no road? I see in NAPR that the road is wide enough for a car to pass and in this place `41.7117982, 44.7682947` there is a barrier that resembling a lift gate
hauke-stieler (2026-07-30 15:39:04+00:00): Hi,

nur ne kurze Anmerkung, dass es nicht reicht die Öffnungszeiten zu entfernt, um ein Geschäft als "nicht mehr da" zu markieren. Bisher war es ganz normal weiterhin als Geschäft eingetragen - nur eben ohne Öffnungszeiten. Habe das Geschäft hier mal korrekt als "nicht mehr da" mittels "disused:shop=..." markiert, schaue es dir gerne an.

Grüße
Hauke
Justin98 (2026-07-31 09:55:53+00:00): Hi Hauke,

vielen Dank für deine Nachricht. 

LG
WeltkarteInRaum301 (2026-06-29 09:46:02+00:00): Wait, wrong building. I cant see how to take back the edit though.
WeltkarteInRaum301 (2026-06-29 10:56:51+00:00): should be fixed with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184788664
s777n (2026-06-29 12:28:37+00:00): Здравствуйте. Не  стоит добавлять временное закрытие дорог в OpenStreetMap - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features  Исправил. Добавил временное ограничение https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/50220397
Frans S (2026-07-02 11:38:29+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. A new mapper. Welcome.
About your mappings. 
Rectangular buildings need to be squared. You can do this by selecting the building and press the Q key,
Best regards
BCNorwich (2026-06-29 12:50:03+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It is not allowed to use information from Google Maps; please see here:-  http://tiny.cc/3mt5101

It would be best to revert the data you've added ASAP. If you need help doing this? Please just ask by commenting below.

Regards Bernard.
danieldegroot2 (2026-06-29 10:32:47+00:00): Added back crossing with service way for now
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184786272
(was concerned with the two footway-footway 'crossings')

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184787448
Keep traffic lights and kerbs separate, if you want to map the pedestrian traffic lights at all.
There is not a kerb in the middle of the footway-footway junction.
(nor is the traffic light preferably but let's ignore them for now)
danieldegroot2 (2026-06-29 10:34:16+00:00): also there is tactile paving on the west/left side but it is rather small and partially below the bollard row :/
(I changed them to 'yes' anyways)
BCNorwich (2026-06-29 12:52:46+00:00): Please see the comment on the previous changeset.
woodpeck (2026-06-29 11:06:37+00:00): Dear robmrt, can you explain how, as a new user, you have uploaded something like 40,000 features in one go with JOSM? Among them sidewalks mapped as area relations and many other complex things. Is this the result of an undocumented import or have you just had a very long editing session in JOSM that you uploaded after many days?
Robmrt (2026-06-29 12:27:45+00:00): Hello @woodpeck,
I'm very sorry, I was in a hurry, and it appears that I accidentally have duplicated large portions that I had downloaded with JOSM.
All my changesets from this morning should be reverted (I am looking into that).
Very sorry.
Robmrt (2026-06-29 13:23:52+00:00): Hello again @woodpeck and any other who may have flagged my changesets today.
I messed up this morning as I was trying to correct a simple mistake and accidentally duplicated a large portion of the Malakoff/Montrouge area.
My last changesets show the reverts I made with JOSM reverter, which thankfully don't seem to have impacted anyone else's work.
In making the reverts, I had the help of an experienced OSM mapper.
I have learned from my mistake and this will not happen again. Very sorry.
Frans S (2026-06-30 13:12:35+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
I reviewed your mappings and noticed that you mapped tall (hi-rise) buildings not correct.
You mapped f.i 1 hi rise buildings as several buildings including a sidewall.

How to map high and high-rise buidings
https://youtu.be/u31wPYWkm3E?si=lDbvDutpUyZWQXXL
I correct them.

Check this webpage to see what I changed to place the buildings correctly.
Best regards and keep mapping.

Best regards
Frans S (2026-06-30 13:13:14+00:00): Sorry. This is the webpage I refer to.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184786632#map=19/10.610182/-67.012425
Best regards
s777n (2026-06-29 12:25:19+00:00): Здравствуйте. Не нужно добавлять временное закрытие дорог в OpenStreetMap - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer Удалил
s777n (2026-06-29 12:26:52+00:00): Правильная ссылка - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features
RF 116 (2026-06-30 09:04:30+00:00): Этот ремонт на 2 года по плану
Добавьте изменения! Там нет дороги
s777n (2026-06-30 21:34:28+00:00): Дайте пожалуйста ссылку на новость или документ какой-нибудь что закрывается действительно действительно на несколько лет. Пока не могу найти.
Wildsharky (2026-07-02 06:42:44+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184953701
user_21298810 (2026-06-30 23:17:19+00:00): Boa Noite, Satisfação

Gostaria de saber porque você está alterando a velocidade nas vias, em trechos diferente possui velocidades menores, e a velocidade máxima da via são privilegiada de acordo com as placas pra manter a segurança viária, e não colisões traseiras!
danieldegroot2 (2026-06-29 11:14:39+00:00): Hey Elmerot,

Are you sure The Black Cat Cafe is no longer there?
It is on the top floor of the building.
This was signed on the ground floor entrance as well.
The cafe is closed on mondays..
It might also be temporarily closed for summer holidays.

Is there a sign or other explicit markings indicating it is permanently closed?
If it is permanently closed, is anything else (another bussiness) there now, or is it empty space?

Regards,

Daniel
Elmerot (2026-06-30 08:06:54+00:00): My apologies, I asked my friend who went there, and he said now, as clarification, that the whole top floor was boarded up, but that could be temporary. The sign is still on the outside of the building. It should at least say “temporarily closed”.
yelisey90 (2026-07-14 17:41:23+00:00): reverted - there is definitely no public through road like that. If it exists, there are some barriers to prevent public passage. Adding a road without them is totally misleading

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185732538
barking-pete (2026-07-03 08:46:06+00:00): https://topostext.org/place/374219FPal
barking-pete (2026-07-03 08:46:41+00:00): https://aristomenismessinios.blogspot.com/2023/11/blog-post.html