piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Reinis Bērziņš (2023-08-14 14:45:12+00:00): Yes, duplicate fences of two adjacent neighbours was my biggest concern at least in theory. In practice the problem arises when one neighbour has a wall, whereas another - fence. And probably in some specific map display styles where left and right side of the fence are not symetrical.
HellMap (2023-08-14 14:46:52+00:00): By the way, there is some recent Mapillary here from May https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1935502296801471&focus=photo . It doesn't let you see much beyond the immediate fences along the road, but I can confirm there's a new fence. Of course, per richlv, one is wire mesh and the other is wooden boards, so types would get quickly mixed if someone ever maps those. Wire mesh one is also offset deeper into the territory. And I don't know if the fence between the two properties is wooden or wire mesh - the wood one was built first after all.
Jordi MF (2023-03-20 20:00:18+00:00): Buenas tardes,

según el DECRETO LEGISLATIVO 2/2006, de 27 de diciembre, del Gobierno de Aragón, por el que se aprueba el texto refundido de la Ley de Delimitación Comarcal de Aragón, la denominación para Monroyo es bilingüe, tanto en castellano como catalán.

Un saludo
Warin61 (2023-05-28 01:13:39+00:00): Hi,
Relation  	15623238, bus route 238: Taronga Zoo Wharf to Balmoral Beach is wrong. It has no bus stops - as least 2 are required for Public Transport Version 2 compliance, one at the start and one at the finish.
rskedgell (2023-03-20 20:41:33+00:00): Hi and thanks for updating OSM.

You probably need something like oneway=yes together with oneway:bicycle=no here.

If there's a contraflow cycle lane, tagging suggestions here might help.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway

I hope that's of some help to you.
TomSzekeres (2023-03-21 11:03:56+00:00): Great, thanks! Looks like another user has fixed this.
eggie (2023-03-20 17:29:31+00:00): In het begin wordt wel meegekeken door ervaren mappers.. Uiteraard om te helpen. De format phone= +31  xxxxx  aangepast.
MVG
eggie
JiyuRicardo (2023-03-20 17:32:48+00:00): Snap ik, dankjewel voor alle tips.
eggie (2023-03-20 18:30:42+00:00): Je kunt evt.  in Emmen ook advies vragen van lokale mapper GEIM.
Hij weet van de hoed en de rand in Emmen. 

Dit zijn de mappers in je omgeving. 
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/oooc?zoom=14&lat=52.77727&lon=6.9276&layers=B0TFFFFFT&contributors=TTTTTT

Mapse
eggie
Littlebtc (2023-04-21 17:29:21+00:00): 您好，感謝您對於 OpenStreetMap 的貢獻，特別是您在台南對道路跟公車路線的調整！

然而在這裡說一下，我發現您的編輯有將道路跟空照圖對齊的傾向，但很不幸的是，大部分能用的空照圖（特別是佳里的Bing）都有5公尺程度的偏差，所以您的編輯把我們之前花了很長時間對齊的佳里市中心又改偏了 QQ

因為我們其他人會定期對國土中心 Open Data 對齊馬路中心點，因此我個人建議道路的些微偏差狀況放著讓其他人修正就好（用 iD 這一點不好解決）；如果你需要檢查並修正，也希望你根據國土中心 Open Data 的圖資（iD 叫 Taiwan e-Map Open Data）修正，這個圖資目前擁有台灣最高的準確度

感謝您 QQ
Littlebtc (2023-04-21 17:56:37+00:00): 台南舊城區的Esri準確度還可以，畫質也不錯（但左鎮不太行），也歡迎您多加利用。
jeslop (2023-03-20 21:47:43+00:00): Hola Txemi GF. 
Dale un vistazo a esto: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Carlos Brys (2023-03-21 10:53:37+00:00): Se elimina la información de datos personales de la edición, porque no están permitidos en OpenStreetMap.
Informe a su tutor o instructor de edición al respecto.
Filip009 (2023-03-30 18:00:50+00:00): Dobrý deň, dávate si pozor na spájanie cesty a hranice. Najlepšie ako sa tomu vyvarovať je skryť hranicu. Pri editovaní v pravej časti je "mapové údaje" (klávesová skratka "U"). Potom rozkliknúť mapové objekty a kliknúť na hranice, tak aby tam políčko nebolo zaškrtnuté.
Carlos Brys (2023-03-21 10:54:38+00:00): Se elimina la información de datos personales de la edición, porque no están permitidos en OpenStreetMap.
Informe a su tutor o instructor de edición al respecto.
Glassman (2023-03-21 22:07:47+00:00): #TIP: square building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133908896
Glassman (2023-03-20 23:17:23+00:00): Same comment as the other edit - if the roads are privately maintained then the appropriate tag would be to use operator=*.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133908906
Glassman (2023-03-20 23:16:23+00:00): access=private means that routers won't send traffic down these roads. Even guests of the people living on the road. If the road is privately owned, you can add a tag operator=* to describe who maintains the road. Let me know if you need help with this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133908998
pancakedrawer001 (2023-03-21 15:23:39+00:00): I see-- so if the street's sign says 'private' for these streets, what's the best access tag for it? 'Residential'?
Glassman (2023-03-21 16:34:05+00:00): I tend to tag them as highway=residential. Where I live there are some HOA roads that could have an operator= tag added but I don't think it does much to make the map better. One alternative would be to use access=permissive along with highway=residential
Carlos Brys (2023-03-21 10:55:24+00:00): Se elimina la información de datos personales de la edición, porque no están permitidos en OpenStreetMap.
Informe a su tutor o instructor de edición al respecto.
Moldovan_Merkator (2023-03-20 19:26:30+00:00): Dude, why you removed 4 aircraft parking position at Chisinau Airport?
Yaaaaaaaa (2023-03-20 20:00:50+00:00): Hi, they are tagged as ways. I just removed the duplicate/useless tags on nodes.
Jordi MF (2023-03-20 17:51:07+00:00): Por favor, AtaulfoRex,
¿Podrías añadir un comentario más acorde y que haga referencia a lo que editas? Lo que estás editando no se corresponde con lo que dices en el "changeset".
Saludos
Jordi MF (2023-03-20 20:08:23+00:00): Buenas tardes,

según el DECRETO LEGISLATIVO 2/2006, de 27 de diciembre, del Gobierno de Aragón, por el que se aprueba el texto refundido de la Ley de Delimitación Comarcal de Aragón, la denominación para Torrevelilla/Torre de Vilella es bilingüe, tanto en castellano como catalán.
Revierto la edición
Un saludo
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-04-22 14:02:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135228709, 135225625 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to fictional edits.
Glassman (2023-03-21 22:10:14+00:00): I removed the untagged ways since they didn't seem to make any sense.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133909453
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-04-22 14:02:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135228709, 135225625 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to fictional edits.
Glassman (2023-03-21 22:14:26+00:00): I removed the untagged way and connected the building polygon into on polygon
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133909676
Glassman (2023-03-21 22:14:49+00:00): I'll send you more info on OSM in a DM
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133909676
Nakaner-repair (2024-03-07 12:59:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148340823 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by 'babis b' because they were uploaded using MAPS.ME, look suspicious (ATM on roads) and the user is unresponsive.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-09 12:23:50+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30649947/history has maxspeed = 0 that was added in this edit
what maxspeed=0 is supposed to mean? If moving for vehicles (or some of them) is not allowed, then maybe one of access tags should be used and maxspeed=0 is not needed?
Something B (2023-04-16 15:45:19+00:00): Hi, Fezz76!
Phone numbers should be in international format. 
Regards, 
Something B.
Fezz76 (2023-04-18 01:13:41+00:00): I added a + before the 1... but guess it never appeared
Geofreund1 (2024-01-16 19:00:49+00:00): Eine Adresse wie:
Kamp-Lintfort
Moerser Straße 167
sollte eindeutig sein. Ein Router tut sich sonst schwer, das gewünschte Ziel zu finden. Bitte mal prüfen.
Danke
Geofreund1
Frans S (2023-03-21 17:39:05+00:00): Hello.
Why don't you take the advises we give you 7 days ago into account? Your mappings are still below par.
Please improve your mapping skills.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133910687
nevw (2023-03-28 11:35:15+00:00): Outer ways of multipolygons cannot share the same boundary….just draw the courts as three simple rectangles instead and delete the unnecessary multipolygon.
You could draw another polygon around the boundary of the tennis club if you want to name the whole club area.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon/validity
nevw (2023-03-28 11:37:29+00:00): As the Geofabrik osm inspector sees it
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.46558&lat=-16.48903&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
okwithmydecay (2023-03-30 13:27:58+00:00): Thank you, I've updated it https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134305054
MxxCon (2023-03-21 04:55:08+00:00): Hello.
Please note that relations are not intended to be used as categories. Just because 2 buildings belong to the same college doesn't mean they should be combined into a single multipolygon.
Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation for more detailed documentation on how to use relations.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133910906
wackycity (2023-03-21 16:13:21+00:00): So, in order to represent that both buildings belong to a single campus, I should l overlay a college amenity way polygon on top of both of them?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133910906
MxxCon (2023-03-21 16:29:04+00:00): Or just simply add appropriate tags on each indicating what they are and who manages/operates them.
MxxCon (2023-03-21 16:31:29+00:00): Also are these the only 2 buildings this college occupies or is there more? And does it occupy the whole buildings or just part of them?
blxght (2023-03-21 19:50:39+00:00): Hej nie rozumiem za bardzo zmian na parking=left? Rzeczywiście zaszła zmiana schematu tagowania ale w przypadku https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1135556771 dokładniejsze by było np. parking:left=half_on_kerb parking:left:orientation=parallel parking:right=no, by nie tracić istniejących danych

Nowy schemat tagowania jest na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking#Examples
DaveF (2023-03-22 16:53:31+00:00): Hi again
Where did you obtain the information that it's a 30mph limit?
Cebderby (2023-03-22 23:56:49+00:00): Also, the bridge used to be correctly mapped and this edit made it wrong
KingAnomaly (2023-03-23 08:24:45+00:00): No, it is not. Come here and see for yourself the new 30 MPH speed limit signs set up all the way.
Cebderby (2023-03-22 23:57:44+00:00): The name tag is for the formal given name of a feature, not a description.  The landuse type is also entirely unsuitable.
KingAnomaly (2023-03-23 08:05:35+00:00): It is suitable I live there and this is only one place wher large vehicle can turn around after a driver will realize that the narrow and low bridge is to small for the to pass through. Very often we see large vehicles crashing into the bridge.
KingAnomaly (2023-03-23 08:06:22+00:00): The name tag is for the formal given name of a feature - please redirect me to wiki which is indicating suitable ones.
Cebderby (2023-03-22 23:58:31+00:00): "1,5" is not a suitable value for lanes
KingAnomaly (2023-03-23 08:22:09+00:00): it is for this street
Cebderby (2023-03-22 23:58:58+00:00): The give way had the correct orientation and your edit made it wrong.
KingAnomaly (2023-03-23 08:15:54+00:00): Alder Lane and Hollins Lane is a main road. Alder Root Lane is a side road.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-20 19:06:30+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 133805036, 133826096, 133852428, 133852548, 133852598, 133852686, 133853029, 133853132, 133853224, 133853311, 133853576, 133853657, 133853902, 133854150, 133860891, 133862248, 133863990, 133864520, 133864620, 133865619, 133866298, 133866516, 133867170, 133867923, 133869300, 133869932, 133870009, 133871139, 133871539, 133871718, 133872327, 133872412, 133873161, 133873628, 133874250, 133874917, 133875073, 133875240, 133875551, 133876445, 133877100, 133878130, 133878403, 133878528, 133889781, 133890007, 133890908, 133892793, 133894121, 133899790.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-24 16:05:10+00:00): What is the source for this new name value?
DressyPear4 (2023-03-21 02:42:55+00:00): Olá, evite duplicar elementos existentes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133911581
DressyPear4 (2023-03-21 02:42:26+00:00): Olá, não adicione vias por cima das existentes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133911628
DressyPear4 (2023-03-21 02:40:58+00:00): Olá, evite adicionar o que já existe!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133911885
DressyPear4 (2023-03-21 02:38:25+00:00): Mais atenção ao deslocar elementos do mapa, use 'Ctrl Z' para desfazer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133912062
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-21 07:03:09+00:00): Thanks! Note that massive multipolygons for example fail to load in iD
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-20 19:30:36+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155883470

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_18305684 (2023-07-15 20:28:40+00:00): Bonjour,

quelle est la source du nom plage de Staine Rita : moi j'ai PLAGE LOUIS CARISTAN, cf. https://baignades.sante.gouv.fr/baignades/consultSite.do?dptddass=973&plv=no&idCarte=guy&annee=2023&xmin=-5825381.869692093&ymin=542166.48549588&xmax=-5812005.389742205&ymax=551338.9288900888&site=973000265

Cordialement
user_18305684 (2023-07-15 20:29:48+00:00): Sainte Rita je voulais dire, lol
adrienandrem (2023-07-17 14:00:55+00:00): Bonjour,

la source du changeset est déjà renseignée par le tag : source=survey
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:source#Sources_ordinaires_couramment_utilis%C3%A9es_pour_l'%C3%A9dition_manuelle

Le toponyme est inscrit sur un panneau présent sur le terrain.

Je tiens à vous avertir qu'un certain nombre de "référentiels" publiés sur le web sont de qualité médiocre voire obsolètes pour la Guyane, en particulier ceux à l'échelle nationale.

Cordialement
olo81 (2023-04-02 18:14:23+00:00): Nie rozdzielamy ciągów pieszo rowerowych na osobne linie: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery
MxxCon (2023-03-21 04:57:36+00:00): Hello.
Does this college occupy only part of this building? If so then this feature should be mapped just a single node, not a polygon encompassing the whole building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133912564
taxi301 (2023-03-21 10:34:08+00:00): Świdwinek jest na południe tu jest Osiedle Wojskowe , Świdwin
https://www.swidwin.pl/asp/zarzady-osiedli,88,,1
https://mswidwin.e-mapa.net/
taxi301 (2023-03-21 13:51:56+00:00): Uchwała Nr.VII/34/19
z dnia 27 marca 2019
w tej samej uchwale załącznik nr. 7 dotyczący Osiedla nr. 7 Zatorze
pio2_122 (2023-03-21 14:24:49+00:00): Dodałem nazwy osiedli z tej uchwały.

Nie mam pomysłu na „części miasta” z PRNG, które nie pokrywają się z nazwami osiedli, więc je zostawiłem. W BDOT10k istnieją one razem z osiedlami. Na razie Świdwinek jako „część miasta” przesunąłem na zachód, w miejsce z BDOT10k https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2668921465
Ewentualnie, można je usunąć lub zmienić na place=locality.
taxi301 (2023-03-21 20:38:59+00:00): czy oni to na pewno aktualizują ? w innym miejscu podają tak
https://pzgik.geoportal.gov.pl/prng/Miejscowosc/PL.PZGiK.204.PRNG.00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000137768-106917
pio2_122 (2023-03-21 21:16:49+00:00): Obie nazwy widnieją obecnie dostępnych (teoretycznie aktualnych, a praktycznie nie wiadomo) danych z rejestrów TERYT, PRNG (podgląd w geoportalu: https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp_2.html?locale=pl&gui=new&sessionID=7045758) i „wykazie urzędowych nazw miejscowości i ich części” https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20130000200/O/D20130200c2.pdf (strona 691).
taxi301 (2023-03-21 21:41:51+00:00): Uchwała nr XXXI/238/2010 Rady Gminy Świdwin
z dnia 23 września 2010r.
w sprawie zmiany Statutu Sołectwa Świdwinek
''1. W skład Sołectwa Świdwinek wchodzą następujące miejscowości: Świdwinek, Psary, Buczyna.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-20 19:40:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10749280774

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kogutowicz-mano (2023-03-20 19:48:03+00:00): Az emléktábláknál a name=* mezőben annak a neve szerepelje, akinek emléket állítottak. Az "emléktábla" szó ne!
Frans S (2023-03-21 17:17:05+00:00): Hello. I reviewed your mappings.
This is a road and building project.
Please don't map other objects like grassland or heath.
Landuse objects are not mapped on HOTOSM projects. These objects often cover more terrain than the task area where you are working on. 
btw, you introduced lots of errors by connecting nodes of these features to the highways. 
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133913691
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-20 20:10:35+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155890551
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15623725

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Falsernet (2023-03-20 20:12:20+00:00): Also added crossing tags, signals
user_1566574 (2023-08-01 17:49:33+00:00): Hi!
Don't you think this place is also a parking?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/702617563

Can you tell me more about your edit?
Thanks! :)
cehceh (2023-08-01 20:32:40+00:00): Hello Antonin,
if you look into the history, you will see that I changed no tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/702617563/history
So it looks like "amenity=parking" was removed 2 years ago (changeset 101515824).
I myself "only" touched the node positions...
Greetings, Matthias
user_1566574 (2023-08-01 20:44:32+00:00): You're absolutely right, I went to fast on this one... Sorry for bothering, thank you! :)
cehceh (2023-08-01 20:44:34+00:00): The way 920942427 is an parking with 6 places... Looks like tagging of this two ways are inconsistant. 
I think access=customers and parking=surface should be moved from 702617563 to 920942427.
FxsX24 (2023-03-20 20:18:47+00:00): finished edits in 133914074
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-22 03:31:37+00:00): Is there a reason you changed this water to a golf feature temporarily?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133914030
ObeyTheGrain (2023-03-22 11:12:51+00:00): Yes. I am detailing the course itself better for use to create a virtual course for a golf simulator. OSM data with lidar data is used to create the course. That water is technically a water hazard on the 17th hole. The programming only understand water hazard not water. I understand people may not want it mapped that way so I did it quickly saved the file then reverted it back.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133914030
Allison P (2023-03-26 07:17:19+00:00): It is never okay to upload incorrect data to the database for any length of time, because consumers may grab it at any moment and use it for months. Fix your golfing app. It has been a headache for dozens of editors who've spent hundreds of hours cleaning up after people like you.
ObeyTheGrain (2023-03-26 12:02:00+00:00): Explain to me how I uploaded incorrect data. That body of water is a water hazard on a golf course. Water hazard is a label in OSM. I used a correct label on a correct feature. I understood that people like yourself would get annoyed so I tried to be polite. Last time I checked it was called “open” street maps not Allison’s or curling man’s street maps.
ObeyTheGrain (2023-03-26 12:35:05+00:00): I welcome constructive criticism or education as I am new to OSM and this is clearly very important to you to be commenting on random changes on a Saturday night. But pointing a virtual finger at someone and saying “people like you” is counter productive and a bit ridiculous.
Allison P (2023-03-26 18:09:50+00:00): A water hazard is a particular feature on a golf course. A river bordering a golf course is a natural feature tagged with river tags. The fact that golfers avoid it doesn't make it a golfing feature.

Please don't get off topic. What I choose to do with my time isn't your business. I am not telling you my personal opinion, I am explaining the community's practices developed through years of editing. "Open"StreetMap doesn't mean "map things whatever way you like".

It's not great that you knew this edit would be an annoyance and proceeded with it anyway. Such attitude is common among mappers using this software, and contributes to why we've tired of it.
ObeyTheGrain (2023-03-27 12:33:42+00:00): I looked up the parcel maps for the area. A portion of that water body, (that has a golf hole in the middle of it) is on the golf course. Land is owned by the municipality and operated by the golf course. So the current mapping is actually incorrect. I will map it appropriately. Again more productive then whatever it is you think you are doing by finger pointing.