piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Der Bierpuncheur (2023-05-30 18:35:27+00:00): No problem. I must’ve forgotten to do this. Thanks for catching it.
user_5359 (2023-05-05 10:54:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use lowercase keys and value! waterway=river instead of Waterway=River.
Langlaeufer (2023-05-04 10:19:58+00:00): Hall JausH ,
Willkommen bei OSM
ich hab dein Tagging vervollständigt. Steht da wirklich ein 241 (getrennter Rad/Gehweg)? Wie ist die Trennung den bei gravel realisiert?
gravel meint übrigenz groben Schotter. das halte ich hier für ausgeschlossen. siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface
Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135687771
limes11 (2024-10-09 10:00:55+00:00): Hallo, 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/767671961

Über diesen Weg verlaufen diverse Routen, die sind zum Teil auch in offiziellen Karten, zB der neanderthalsteig, https://www.neanderland.de/tour/der-neanderland-steig

Das accces=no ist daher fragwürdig. Bitte um Klärung.

Viele Grüße
limes11 (2024-10-09 11:56:25+00:00): Aussage von stadt-due-Lengsfeld: 
Amt 68 (Garten- und Landschaftsamt) hat diese Änderung beantragt.

War den Durchführenden bewusst, dass hier ausgezeichnete Wanderwege des Kreises Mettmann verlaufen ? Sowie der "Düsseldorfer Weg" des Sauerländischen Gebirgsvereins. Wurden die Betreiber über die Schließung der Wege informiert ?

Viele Grüße
stadt-Due-Lengsfeld (2024-10-09 12:12:39+00:00): Dazu kann ich persönlich keine Aussage tätigen, wir sind als Vermessungsamt in dem Fall nur die ausfürende Kraft. Werde das ganze aber gerne an die entsprechende Stelle weiter leiten und nach Klärung bescheid geben.
Viele Grüße
limes11 (2024-10-10 15:58:03+00:00): Super, vielen Dank für die Mithilfe !
Hmmbeere (2026-02-26 16:36:57+00:00): Vor Ort verlaufen Neanderlandsteig und Düsseldorfer Weg über diesen Pfad (außerdem eine alte ehemalige Wandermarkierung mit Kreis erkennbar), auch kein informeller Trampelpfad, da nördlich eine extra genaue Treppe hinunterführt. Stellt sich vor Ort also eindeutig als legal begehbarer Weg dar, daher entsprechend auf OSM geändert.
gebux (2023-05-04 10:51:09+00:00): Hallo Starworm,
Wegnummern gehören nicht in die Namen von einzelnen Wegabschnitten, dafür gibt es Wanderwegsrelationen. Diese Relationen werden von Wanderkarten ausgewertet und angezeigt - z.b. hier: https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=14.0/46.6832/14.8707

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Wandern

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Austria/Wanderwege
literan (2023-05-04 17:02:37+00:00): это не названия, а текст, написанный на вывеске.
Сара Кварц (2023-05-05 06:34:01+00:00): Да, ошибочка, извиняюсь.
literan (2023-05-05 08:21:34+00:00): На всякий случай, вот текст правил:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#%D0%98%D0%BC%D1%8F_-_%D1%8D%D1%82%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B8_%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE
Сара Кварц (2023-05-05 08:25:34+00:00): Благодарю!
Marian Mika (2023-05-05 10:26:45+00:00): Kurník, a to sa mi ako podarilo nedoplniť postcode? Vďaka za opravu.
toc-rox (2023-10-15 07:25:25+00:00): Einige Wege sind auf erheblicher Länge als Furt (ford=yes) getaggt. Das kann eigentlich nicht korrekt sein.
MxxCon (2023-05-05 02:00:46+00:00): Hello.
What is the purpose of this relation? All the street segments are already mapped and tagged as ways. Seems like goes against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
Also why did you add subway platforms to a street relation?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135689512
Reino Baptista (2023-05-05 08:25:30+00:00): Hello,
"What is the purpose of this relation? "
To depict that "Wall Street" is in reality represented in OSM with four (4) segments:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15806058#map=18/40.70601/-74.00901

"Seems like goes against..." 
Please note that Relations are widely used to bind scattered elements:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation

"why did you add subway platforms to a street relation?"
That was I mistake and I immediately took action, it lasted for less then 5 minutes.
Subway platforms were accidentally added to a street relation and quickly removed:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135689545

Note that I only add a cohesion element which does not interfere with anything else previously represented. 

Examples of the use of "type"="street" in NY area:
Please have a look in: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1uzF

Also please have a look on Westchester Avenue:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14870829

Last and more important: 
If you feel bothered with this edition I have no problem on undo it. 

RB
MxxCon (2023-05-31 06:00:26+00:00): It seems like this relation adds nothing to the map that is not already represented by the existing ways and tags.
You say "used to bind scattered elements", but Wall Street is not scattered and all 4 ways are contiguous and connected to each other.
I'm not "bothered", but my concern with adding relation is that they complicate editing the map requiring extra steps to make sure relation remains intact and add/remove ways in that relation as needed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135689512
Reino Baptista (2023-05-31 08:06:49+00:00): I'm sorry but "...they complicate editing the map requiring extra steps to make sure relation remains intact and add/remove ways in that relation as needed." that's mapping all day long!
MxxCon (2023-05-31 08:13:56+00:00): It is when it is necessary.
But when it adds no value to the map, it is unnecessary extra work and hassle.
Reino Baptista (2023-05-31 08:37:33+00:00): Then, what about?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/374450

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/373954

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/373962

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/373964

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/373963

Aren't you been bias or something?
MxxCon (2023-06-01 01:12:06+00:00): I don't understand what you are saying.
Yes, there are other street relations. Yes, they should be looked over and perhaps considered if they are necessary.
I saw you make this edit and commented on it.
There are only so many hours in the day to edit maps. One step at a time. Handle this relation and at a later point handle other.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-16 12:39:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137412856 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers
Romwriter (2023-05-04 10:31:26+00:00): ganz sicher?
eggie (2023-05-04 09:05:31+00:00): Dag Marco  

Alle begin is moeilijk... 

Het gebied van je edits is wel erg groot geworden.
Je pad heb je vastgeplakt aan de grens van het Noordhollands Duinreservaat 
. Dat is geen weg of pad.
Ook heb je het pad op slot gezet met access=no

Wanneer bovenstaande verkeersdeelnemers er door mogen dan lijkt access=no (Verboden Toegang) niet correct.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=135690101

Ik heb access=no verwijderd..  en het pad losgemaakt van het Natuurreservaat,

MVG
eggie
marcoveldhuys (2023-05-04 09:20:52+00:00): Dat was inderdaad niet de bedoeling. 
bedankt!
eggie (2023-05-04 09:25:48+00:00): No problem....   Iets toevoegen met zoveel lijnen (Multipolygonen)  is ook geen sinecure.

... en je paadje staat er toch maar mooi in. :)
Mapse
eggie
GilB (2023-07-23 07:24:53+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour la participation à OSM. 
Ce point d’intérêt était déjà présent (mais pas forcément visible vue la concentration de commerces à cet endroit). De plus il faut éviter d'utiliser les point "Adresses" déjà présents et plutôt créer un nouveau point ou mettre à jour l'existant.
Je vais reprendre ces modifications.
maraf24 (2023-05-10 19:29:13+00:00): Teren ten jest dostępny dla każdego pieszego i rowerzysty.
user_5359 (2023-05-04 11:30:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don‘t modify the county, who are you located!
Xvtn (2023-05-04 14:55:12+00:00): These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions

***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc.
KarinaLis (2023-05-15 15:25:44+00:00): Corrected based on comments. Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135691486
Xvtn (2023-05-04 14:55:04+00:00): These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions

***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc.
KarinaLis (2023-05-15 15:25:24+00:00): Corrected based on comments. Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135691664
HansWesterback (2023-05-07 14:43:59+00:00): Hej! Ser att du tagit bort namnet Auravägen på några stickvägar/servicevägar. Varför? Enligt både Lantmäteriet och Trafikverket så har dessa namnet Auravägen
Anders Ström (2023-05-07 14:56:51+00:00): Jag utgick från Danderyds kommuns gatukarta, där är de inte angivna som gator. Jag gjorde motsvarande ändring på Sveavägen, där var det definitivt fel eftersom det är en privat infart med soptunna ock brevlåda ute vid vägen.
Vid Auravägen är det ett gränsfall.
HansWesterback (2023-05-08 09:12:15+00:00): Det är säkrare att utgå från Lantmäteriets Min Karta (https://minkarta.lantmateriet.se/) och Trafikverkets NVDB (https://nvdb2012.trafikverket.se/SeTransportnatverket). Dessutom om jag tittar på kommunens karta här https://www.danderyd.se/karta/ så har dessa stumpar namn
Anders Ström (2023-05-09 12:41:25+00:00): 1. Jag har utgått från kommunens officiella tryckta papperskarta. Den karta som finns på kommunens hemsida är från Google.
2. Det saknas skylt för återvändsgata vid infarterna, det skulle ha funnits om det var residential street. Det finns skylt för återvändsgata vid Sveastigen och den är kodad residential street.
3. En gata ska normalt vara en linje/kurva inte grena upp sig i ett träd.
4. Både Min karta och NVDB är uppenbart felaktiga på Sveastigen på andra sidan gatan, den fortsätter förbi grindstolpar och brevlådor in på tomterna. OSM är rätt där. Varför ska jag lita på Min karta och NVDB? NVDB ber ju att man ska hjälpa till att rätta fel, så då kan man knappast räkna med att den är felfri.
5. Jag har varit på plats och tittat, har du?

Det finns exempel i närheten där stickgator är residential street, men då har stickgatan ett eget namn. Exempelvis Hildingastigen, Gautiodsvägen och Sveastigen.
HansWesterback (2023-05-09 13:14:04+00:00): Ok, mycket i OSM är ju en fråga om tycke, smak och personliga preferenser, det finns ju ofta inte några absoluta regler. Jag såg nånstans frasen ”the latest mapper decides”, så jag böjer mig för dig som är lokal auktoritet på Danderyd. Det här är ju egentligen petitesser, huvudsaken är att vi alla hjälps åt att göra OSM bättre. Happy mapping😁
SzymonH (2023-05-07 08:04:24+00:00): Skąd te dane, że nie mogą wjeżdżać samochody? Na teren kościoła nadal mogą wjeżdżać i parkować samochody uczestników mszy, nabożeństw itp. Wczoraj przejeżdżałem obok, zwróciłem specjalnie na to uwagę - żaden nowy znak się nie pojawił, więc nic się nie zmieniło...
Iga | Yanosik (2023-05-09 14:09:14+00:00): Taką informację otrzymałam od Zgłaszającego. Jeśli w terenie osobiście udało się potwierdzić, że wprowadzono mnie w błąd, wycofuję wprowadzone informacje. Dziękuję za komentarz.
Xvtn (2023-05-04 14:55:01+00:00): These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions

***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc.
Vika_Nosovich (2023-05-05 09:12:03+00:00): Revert https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135732376#map=15/41.7431/-111.8570
Xvtn (2023-05-04 14:54:58+00:00): These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions

***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc.
Vika_Nosovich (2023-05-05 09:13:25+00:00): Revert https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135732429
Xvtn (2023-05-04 14:53:57+00:00): These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions

***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc.
Vika_Nosovich (2023-05-05 09:10:59+00:00): Revert https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135732329
dpolovinkin (2023-07-28 16:07:53+00:00): reverted by 139142526
Xvtn (2023-05-04 14:54:00+00:00): These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions

***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc.
Vika_Nosovich (2023-05-05 09:09:27+00:00): Revert https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135732284#map=17/41.72854/-111.82741
Rico557 (2024-01-29 12:58:32+00:00): Talochki is Povshtovhy? You probably haven't heard about transliteration of place names? It would be if I renamed Hrigoriy Skovoroda Street into Ryhor Patelnya Street.
Xvtn (2023-05-04 14:54:02+00:00): These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions

***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc.
Vika_Nosovich (2023-05-05 09:01:28+00:00): Revert https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135731967
user_5359 (2023-05-05 06:19:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Stop using wrong values and misuse of address:street. Advertising is unwanted.
Xvtn (2023-05-04 14:54:12+00:00): These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions

***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc.
Vika_Nosovich (2023-05-05 09:03:32+00:00): Revert https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135732045
Tilia_J (2023-05-04 11:45:00+00:00): Als het gebouw niet is gebouwd, waarom pas je de outline aan?

Gebouwen op deze manier aanpassen is sowieso geen optie aangezien deze uit de BAG geimporteerd worden.

Volgens de BAG staat hier gewoon een pand. Om dit correct af te handelen zul je een terugmelding bij het BAG moeten doen:

https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?objectId=0014010022187415&theme=BRT%20Achtergrond&geometry.x=234133.44834551995&geometry.y=581630.6469492555&zoomlevel=15

Als het BAG correct is dan kun je een import aanvragen bij de OSM community:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/770
rreuvekamp (2023-05-09 09:03:39+00:00): Hoi, dank voor de reactie!

> Als het gebouw niet is gebouwd, waarom pas je de outline aan?

Omdat het nu matcht met de realiteit. Ik had het in het echt nog even gecontroleerd op het oog. 

Via een lokale bewoner hoorde ik dat er plannen waren voor nieuwbouw, wat volgens OSM/BAG 1 geheel is met het bestaande gebouw. Echter is de vergunning nooit verstrekt en is de plaats 10 jaar later nog leeg.

> Om dit correct af te handelen zul je een terugmelding bij het BAG moeten doen

Dit is een goede tip, ik ga er mee aan de slag. Dank je!
Xvtn (2023-05-04 14:54:15+00:00): These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions

***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc.
Vika_Nosovich (2023-05-05 09:06:44+00:00): Revert https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135732155
trigpoint (2023-05-04 16:14:33+00:00): Hi
This seems a very odd place for a doctors, a node in the middle of a pedestrian street in a park.

What  are you trying to achieve?
Syl (2023-05-06 22:03:58+00:00): Hello, does this phone still work?
gsperb (2023-05-07 08:40:22+00:00): why should a phone be present but not working?
Syl (2023-05-07 09:12:52+00:00): Because in France public phones doesn't works since 2017. Few still work (maybe ≃15 today) in zones where mobile phones don't work.
Did you check if there is a phone in the booth and if the phone have a tone?
CoyKoi (2023-05-05 04:31:17+00:00): Rainbow's End is already mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29418232/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135694094
yelisey90 (2023-05-05 19:27:51+00:00): Hi! tracktype=grade2 is for gravel roads, those that were levelled by a bulldozer and where some additional gravel was added. These roads are just dirt roads, so it's grade3. Please revert
yelisey90 (2023-05-05 19:27:45+00:00): Hi! tracktype=grade2 is for gravel roads, those that were levelled by a bulldozer and where some additional gravel was added. These roads are just dirt roads, so it's grade3. Please revert
luisforte (2023-05-04 11:12:09+00:00): Bom dia,
Tem andado a criar leisure=park que nem cogumelos, desde baldios a parques infantis. Creio que poucos, senão mesmo nenhum, serão park.
Sugiro uma re-leitura da wiki nestes tópicos
Luis
Andrefg (2023-05-05 17:55:24+00:00): Boa tarde,
Os terrenos que estou a nomear são áreas que na legislação portuguesa são chamadas de “Estrutura Verde Secundária”. Áreas que em 2018 eram baldios, mas que agora estão ou já foram alteradas (e que a Camara Municipal de Coimbra tem como áreas verdes de geridas). O OSM não tem algo relacionado com isto, e o mais aproximado que encontrei foi a designação de Park. 
Mas vou rever um pouco mais, para ver se há algum tipo de Tag mais próxima. 
Obrigado pela observação. Se tiver alguma sugestão, agradeço que a com-partilhe.
luisforte (2023-05-05 22:24:37+00:00): Olá,
Além de leisure=park existem outras tags adequadas para espaços verdes geridos, como leisure=garden, landuse=village_green e outros. Parece-me que aos espaços que referi no comentário anterior, e como me diz que são espaços geridos, se adequa o landuse=village_green como acontece em https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169531396 ou em https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169531840. Não conheço bem Coimbra, por isso refiro estas como simples sugestões.
O parque infantil que definiu como leisure=park tem uma tag mais adequada, leisure=playgound.
Leisure=park, difere destes exemplos na área(bastante superior), utilização ou infra-estruturas incluidas. 
A designação dada pelo municipio é muitas vezes uma boa indicação para a sua classificação, embora grandes jardins por vezes possam ser classificados de parques.
Boas edições
Tilia_J (2023-05-04 11:52:17+00:00): Volgens mij is dit geen verbetering. Volgens de BAG heet dit stuk gewoon Industrieweg en zijn de aanliggende adressen ook industrieweg
luisforte (2023-05-04 11:35:47+00:00): Olá, bom dia,
Normalmente addr:*, como addr:postcode, aplica-se nos endereços de POI e edificios.
Para atribuir o codigo postal a uma rua ou ou  ao nó de uma localidade, como é este caso, postal_code:xxx-xxx será mais adequado (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:postal_code).
Continuação de boas edições, Luis
user_5359 (2023-05-04 14:25:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Sorry, we can use entries with foreign keys. If you need help, You are welcome!
Xvtn (2023-05-04 14:54:19+00:00): These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions

***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc.
Vika_Nosovich (2023-05-05 09:08:12+00:00): Revert https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135732233
Xvtn (2023-05-04 14:53:45+00:00): These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions

***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc.
Vika_Nosovich (2023-05-05 08:57:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135731761#map=16/41.7500/-111.8195
gscscnd (2023-05-04 13:03:26+00:00): Jeśli budynek, to musi być tag building. Jeśli szablony edytora iD są zbyt ułomne, to po prostu dodaj ten tag, gdzieś tam jest możliwość edycji „surowych” tagów oprócz uzupełniania szablonów.
Xvtn (2023-05-04 14:54:25+00:00): These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions

***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc.
Vika_Nosovich (2023-05-05 09:05:09+00:00): Revert https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135732106#map=15/41.7416/-111.8269
CoyKoi (2023-05-05 04:37:21+00:00): Hi Sucl, the driveway should just be drawn as a single line, not as an area. It does not need a name tag
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135697181
wambacher (2023-05-05 07:58:44+00:00): Hi, habe gerade die PLZ der Nachtschicht korrigiert (Typo).
Dabei ist mir aufgefallen, dass der Weblink "https://nachtschicht.business.site/" nicht funktioniert. Da fragt man sich schon, ob es den Laden noch gibt.
wambacher (2023-05-05 08:02:38+00:00): kennst du https://wambachers-osm.website/Postcodes.html?map=15/52.231506/7.496424&base=OSM&data=WPCDE
Martin Borsje (2024-04-27 06:11:54+00:00): Hoi wvdp, je hebt dit gebied als militair getagd en in je comment "military base" gemeld. Dit is natuurlijk verre van de waarheid. Inderdaad oefent het leger er wel eens (zeer beperkt, alleen voetvolk) en het gebied is onbeperkt, onvoorwaardelijk toegankelijk voor recreanten. Ik stel voor het militair gebruik eraf te halen. Gaarne tijdige reactie. Martin.