piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
allwe231 (2026-03-11 03:48:37+00:00): Panyangkalan: aqueduct bukan suntingan dari saya. Saya hanya berniat mengganti nama aliran sungai yang sebenarnya. Karena ketika saya membuka informasi alirannya memang sudah tertera aqueduct.
FajrAl (2026-03-11 04:00:56+00:00): Dalam editornya, ketika sebuah fitur diubah tag atau geometrinya, akan muncul alat validasi. Di sini mungkin Anda tidak sengaja membuat aliran airnya menjadi bridge=* karena melewati jalan. Hal ini gak apa-apa, tapi nanti kalau ada error, harap jalannya yang dijadikan bridge=*.
Salah satu riwayat fitur yang dijadikan aqueduct: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/199139101/history/14
NeisAgent (2026-03-11 21:02:26+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google Maps or another Google mapping service as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google Maps or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
Ростислав Кирій (2026-03-13 00:06:41+00:00): Are the historical images on Google Earth really false? I used them as an additional source, and based on research and knowledge of the area. And I only specified using historical images the areas where power transmission towers pass through dense forests. In 2002-2006, those areas were not overgrown, but later they became overgrown, so it is impossible to distinguish anything, and some towers were simply clearly missing. I specified using many different satellite images from different years.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-13 06:24:28+00:00): IMHO, yes.

Do you see any copyright notices or terms of use on the satellite imagery there?
Ростислав Кирій (2026-03-13 14:46:29+00:00): Yes, I see the copyright notice. I understand that Google imagery cannot be used as a source for OSM. My edits were based on local knowledge and research of the power line route. Historical images were used only for orientation in forest areas where the poles are not currently visible. In the future, I will only use permitted sources.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-13 14:55:08+00:00): 👍 Thanks for your reply.
lyctkel (2026-03-21 08:12:12+00:00): Hi RJ-Gouda,
You're a new and very active mapper. That's great—OSM depends on being not only used, but also expanded and maintained.

I noticed that here 
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13635191214) 
you're listing various types of waste in detail. 
There is a tag for this: recycling:pmd
The detailed listing is not necessary.
You can find the documentation here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:recycling:pmd

You are also using descriptive names (name=PMD, name=GFT, etc.). 
This is not recommended mapping practice. It’s better to use description=... here.
Details can be found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

By the way, the recycling containers can also be added with location=underground.
At least, it looks like the containers are mostly underground in the aerial photos.

Feel free to reach out if you have any questions.

Best regards,

lyctkel
RJ-Gouda (2026-03-21 19:40:12+00:00): Hi lyctkel,

Thanks for the feedback! And the resources describing the recommended mapping practises. I will favorite those to refer to when I am adding/updating types of waste collection.

Best regards,
RJ-Gouda
lyctkel (2026-03-22 17:59:43+00:00): Hi RJ-Gouda,

Thank you.
Happy mapping!

Kind regards,
lyctkel
NeisBot (2026-03-10 23:54:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13635186081 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "IT office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-19 05:33:29+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089546
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
OSM_RogerWilco (2026-03-12 05:46:48+00:00): Moin!
Für Verkehrsflächen lieber das (neue) area:highway verwenden.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway

Viele Grüße
codywindrose (2026-03-15 17:14:45+00:00): Habe sie soeben alle auf area:highway= gestellt.
Romwriter (2026-03-11 17:49:00+00:00): Hallo Dharion, und vielen Dank für Deinen Beitrag hier. Zwei Anmerkungen: (a) Es ist wohl zutreffend, den straßenbegleitenden Geh- und Radweg separat einzuzeichnen, weil er baulich abgesetzt ist (überwiegend durch einen Grünstreifen getrennt). Bisher war er als Bestandteil der Straße erfasst. Ich entferne diesen Straßenbestandteil, damit der Geh- und Radweg nicht doppelt erfasst ist und die Daten zusammenpassen. (b) Sicher, dass das ein "footway" ist? Ist der Weg nicht mit Verkehrszeichen 240 beschildert? --- Beste Grüße, Romwriter
Romwriter (2026-03-11 17:57:20+00:00): ... Änderungen zu Anmerkung (a) siehe hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179715994 Bei dieser Gelegenheit habe ich außerdem den neu eingezeichneten Weg am südlichen Ende mit dem Straßennetz verbunden, der hing noch im Nichts ;-)
GerdP (2026-03-23 19:08:40+00:00): Wenn ich das richtig sehe, sind durch die Änderung auch diverse Radrouten lückenhaft bzw. müssten auf den separat gezeichneten Weg verlegt werden.
Romwriter (2026-03-31 08:58:52+00:00): @GerdP - erledigt! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180662011
GerdP (2026-03-31 09:08:10+00:00): Ich dachte, ich hätte das schon erledigt. Ist der Weg entlang der Kladdinger Straße neuerdings wirklich mit VZ240 ausgeschildert? Auf meinen Fotos von Anfang 2025 sehe ich das noch nicht. Wurde der evtl. saniert?
GerdP (2026-03-31 09:16:52+00:00): Sorry, an der Einmündung Schützenweg sehe ich ein VZ240 von SW kommend sichtbar. Passt also wohl.
bxl-forever (2026-03-11 21:51:13+00:00): The real changeset title should have been this: Fixed mistakes by changesets 179662050 179662005 179661977 179661917 (new user messed with building geometries, addresses and relations + user also broke a school polygon).

(The title from a previous changeset had been used by mistake, after inadvertently using UP and DOWN arrow keys in JOSM.)
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 06:30:10+00:00): What building issue did you fix? What are you even trying to do? Why did you move a node by a metre?
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 03:04:20+00:00): Reverted for now, will manually review and and repair later if needed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179783640
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 06:16:22+00:00): Re-reverting due to my editing blunder

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179791255
limes11 (2026-04-17 21:55:17+00:00): Moin, 

ist das NSG 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12605297

aufgelöst worden ? NSG und LSG q
limes11 (2026-04-17 21:55:34+00:00): quasi deckungsgleich ergibt normalerweise keinen Sinn. 

Viele Grüße
the_jandroid (2026-04-17 22:37:28+00:00): Hallo, danke für den Kommentar!
Sowohl das NSG als auch das LSG Zengermoos sind aktuell, habe mich beim Eintragen auch gewundert.

Viele Grüße
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 06:36:06+00:00): What building issue did you fix? What are you trying to do? You moved the buildings to the wrong place.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 03:10:18+00:00): Reverted for now, will manually review and and repair later if needed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179783733
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 06:27:48+00:00): It's obviously not `layer=-1`.
あじさか (2026-03-12 00:38:51+00:00): I have already mentioned this several times, but please do not move existing roads or buildings to match Bing imagery without correcting the imagery offset, as this creates inconsistencies with the existing data.
sykul (2026-03-11 14:07:04+00:00): Bonjour. Merci pour l'ajout, mais je crois que l'object est vraiment un bâtiment.
Mapikids (2026-03-11 14:11:43+00:00): Bonjour, d'après le wiki si le complexe occupe la totalité du building il peut être marqué ainsi : "Create a node (within an area mapped as a building=*) and add the tag leisure=indoor_play. If the indoor play area takes up the entire building or a clearly defined area within the building, it may be mapped as an area instead." Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dindoor_play Après, je suis qu'un "simple" contributeur :)
sykul (2026-03-11 15:44:16+00:00): Oui, donc le bâtiment ne devrait pas être supprimé. On peut faire un building=commercial et marquer le indoor_play comme noeud séparément.
Mapikids (2026-03-11 16:18:32+00:00): J'ai corrigé, est-ce que nous sommes en phase sur le nouveau changeset ? Si oui je ferai une passe sur les autres site du réseau Gulli Parc.
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 06:28:44+00:00): It's obviously not `layer=-1`. You moved everything to the wrong place too. Did you even look at aerial imagery?
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 06:48:17+00:00): Re-reverted due to my editing blunder

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179792479
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 06:34:41+00:00): What building issue did you fix? What are doing? The building shape is wrong.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 03:11:33+00:00): Reverted for now, will manually review and and repair later if needed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179783746
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 06:48:28+00:00): Re-reverted due to my editing blunder

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179792479
felipeeugenio (2026-03-11 13:48:44+00:00): Hola. No necesariamente el camino interior de un condominio se llama igual que el condominio. Las direcciones de las casas interiores se refieres a los nombres que agregó o es solo para que no aparezcan sin nombre?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179663039
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 06:30:43+00:00): This is obviously wrong. Did you even look at aerial imagery?
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 03:04:21+00:00): Reverted for now, will manually review and and repair later if needed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179783640
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 06:15:36+00:00): Re-reverting due to my editing blunder

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179791184
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 06:32:44+00:00): What building issue did you fix? What are doing? You moved the buildings to the wrong place.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 03:10:19+00:00): Reverted for now, will manually review and and repair later if needed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179783733
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 06:44:54+00:00): What building issue did you fix? What are you doing? Why did you delete the buildings, only to redraw them wrongly?
kingkingHK (2026-03-12 12:36:33+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179755086 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 06:42:23+00:00): Why did you delete the buildings?
kingkingHK (2026-03-12 12:36:52+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179755086 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
tguen (2026-04-07 03:08:55+00:00): you left the dentists website
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179663254
Glassman (2026-03-11 20:18:04+00:00): the highway speed is tagged as 30 mph, but you changed the max speed on the node to 20 mph. Which is correct? Typically maxspeed is only used on roads, not nodes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179663259
Edmans WA (2026-03-11 21:00:14+00:00): I'm new here and not entirely familiar with the conventions.

the road is very likely 30. During school hours, the camera/ALPR slows traffic down to 20mph. That is what I was attempting to note.
Glassman (2026-03-13 02:48:17+00:00): You opened up a tagging that I've never done. But basically to add school speed limit zone, split the way at each sign. the school zone portion add the tag maxspeed:conditional=20 @ children_present maxspeed:conditional=20 @ flashing (for flashing lights telling drivers to slow down.) See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:conditional
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 06:41:07+00:00): Why did you delete random roads????????
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:53:51+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 06:40:01+00:00): Why did you delete the buildings????
kingkingHK (2026-03-12 12:09:47+00:00): Reverted for now, will manually review and repair later if needed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179754853
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 06:48:08+00:00): What are you doing????????????
kingkingHK (2026-03-12 12:50:30+00:00): Reverted for now, will manually review and repair later if needed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179756875
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 06:50:44+00:00): What are you even doing??????????????
kingkingHK (2026-03-12 12:50:16+00:00): Reverted for now, will manually review and repair later if needed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179756865
NeisBot (2026-03-11 00:31:10+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13635271961 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "ED Performance office"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "ED Performance Büro"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-19 05:33:30+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179663913
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 06:52:24+00:00): Everything is wrong.
kingkingHK (2026-03-12 12:37:02+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179755086 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
mvexel (2026-03-11 00:48:40+00:00): Edited with #EveryDoor while here. Old cuss opened their new brick and mortar location recently and ceased operations in Woodbine. No more coffee in Woodbine! :(
I-76 (2026-03-11 12:37:58+00:00): 1776 changesets 🔥
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 06:53:01+00:00): Why did you move buildings to the sea???????
kingkingHK (2026-03-12 12:49:57+00:00): Reverted for now, will manually review and repair later if needed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179756859
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 06:53:54+00:00): What building issue did you fix? Why did you delete two random roads?
kingkingHK (2026-03-12 12:37:16+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179755086 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 06:55:31+00:00): There's so many things wrong about this I don't even know where to start.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:54:07+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-11 08:04:13+00:00): Hi CAM-Gerlach_Revert,

I think something went wrong here. Both of your nodes contain spammy descriptions.

Best regards
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-11 16:45:48+00:00): Hi Pascal, see my reply to your other comment for full details: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179664298#c1566980 but TL;DR for anyone else reading, I had to revert the SEO spammer's changesets one by one due to OSM-Revert not letting my new-ish dedicated `_Revert` account revert them all three cleanly at once, so some SEO spam text remains until the third revert changeset 179664487 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179664487
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-03-11 16:46:37+00:00): Thanks for checking, and sorry for any confusion!
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-11 17:04:47+00:00): 👍
Yiannis Retreat Studios Kato Zakros Crete (2026-03-15 14:38:18+00:00): "Please correct the name of this location to 'Yiannis Retreat' (instead of 'Yannis') and move the marker to the exact building coordinates. The current point is both misplaced and has an incorrect name. Official website for verification: www.katozakros-rooms.com - Traditional Guest House complex."
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-03-15 23:07:31+00:00): See reply on changeset 179664298 : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179664298#c1569545
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 06:58:31+00:00): Why are you deleting everything?????
kingkingHK (2026-03-12 12:49:10+00:00): Reverted for now, will manually review and repair later if needed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179756833
NeisBot (2026-03-11 01:07:09+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/442598498 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "traditional apartments"

#MapWithoutSpam
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-03-11 02:29:17+00:00): I had to revert this in multiple steps due to the artificial limitations of OSM-Revert, so my revert account temporarily appeared to be responsible for the SEO spam text I was reverting but it is all reverted and removed now.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-11 02:30:57+00:00): (Hopefully the bot doesn't add back the reverted SEO spam text as it did in another changeset)
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-11 08:07:34+00:00): Hi CAM-Gerlach_Revert, CAM-Gerlach,

there are no "artificial limitations" involved here. As I wrote in the changeset discussion (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179243590), this was caused by a bug in the bot’s rule set. The issue has been fixed, so this constellation should not normally occur again.

Best regards,
Pascal
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-11 16:39:13+00:00): Hi Pascal, sorry if I wasn't totally clear here--the "artificial limitations" mentioned above refer to OSM-Revert, nothing to do with the NeisBot bug (which would have only been a potential factor given the issue with the former, and of course you fixed now in any case).

Namely, since I was using my new dedicated "_Revert" account (which I created recently to avoid polluting my main account with these revert changesets), it thought I was a "new user" (defined by it as less than 100 changesets, albeit by the time my main account had 100 changesets I'd sunk well over 100 hours into OSM).

As such, OSM-Revert would not let me revert more than one commit at a time, so I had to revert the user's three SEO spam commits one by one in separate changesets instead of cleanly in one, waiting in between them for Overpass to update (if JOSM didn't make it a pain to switch accounts, I'd just have done it manually). Therefore, this changeset and the other one (reverting the third and second SEO spam changesets) still contains some of the SEO spam added in the first changeset, which was then removed by the final changeset in the revert sequence.

Again, sorry for any confusion and hope that clears things up!
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-11 16:47:40+00:00): Just for reference, that final changesets was: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179664487
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-11 17:02:12+00:00): 👍
Yiannis Retreat Studios Kato Zakros Crete (2026-03-15 14:39:18+00:00): "Please correct the name of this location to 'Yiannis Retreat' (instead of 'Yannis') and move the marker to the exact building coordinates. The current point is both misplaced and has an incorrect name. Official website for verification: www.katozakros-rooms.com - Traditional Guest House complex."
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-03-15 23:06:34+00:00): While normally I would suggest you go ahead and make the change yourself or leave a note (as I see you did), since I was responsible for the revert and you at least put in the effort to reach out I went ahead and in changeset/179920106 changeset/179920106 , did you the favor of updating the name and also added back a heavily corrected valid subset of de-SEO-promotion-ified tags extracted from your original changeset, 179314993 changeset/179314993

As neither of your notes nor the referenced website specifies the "exact coordinates" that this POI node should be moved to (nor any other specific instructions on its location), and your previous changesets involved several different nodes and ways for the same/similarly-named elements in different locations (OSM has a general rule of "1 feature, 1 OSM element"), I'll leave followup on that to you. Feel free to move this node to the centroid of the POI it represents (either the entire retreat area, or a specific cottage), and if you like add specific names/tags to specific buildings within it. I'm happy to review any followup changesets and recommend or implement any further fixes.

Just to note, any tags pertaining directly to a specific building (its name, building=* type, building:levels=* , etc.) should go on the building way, while tags common to the entire retreat (contact info, payment, website, etc) should go on either a node near its center or a way around its boundaries with the appropriate top-level tag(s). If the retreat complex as a whole has a single street address, that would generally go on the single retreat node/way, while if each building has its own housenumber then that would either go on the building way, on a separate node or the building door, depending on local convention for your country (I couldn't find anything documented specifically about OSM addressing conventions in Greece, so you'll want to look at how other things are mapped or ask a local mapper).

If you have any further questions as you are mapping, you are more than welcome to reach out. Cheers, and happy mapping!
Mashin (2026-03-11 08:49:34+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
When adding a business or POI, it has to be placed exactly where its office physically reside ideally with filled in address.
Cheers
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 06:59:38+00:00): Bad. Just bad.
kingkingHK (2026-03-12 12:48:53+00:00): Reverted for now, will manually review and repair later if needed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179756813
Yiannis Retreat Studios Kato Zakros Crete (2026-03-15 14:40:43+00:00): "Please correct the name of this location to 'Yiannis Retreat' (instead of 'Yannis') and move the marker to the exact building coordinates. The current point is both misplaced and has an incorrect name. Official website for verification: www.katozakros-rooms.com - Traditional Guest House complex."
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-03-15 23:07:54+00:00): See reply on changeset 179664298 : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179664298#c1569545
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 07:01:50+00:00): Why did you delete a random building?? Can you not see from aerial imagery that it exists????
kingkingHK (2026-03-12 12:37:28+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179755086 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 07:03:35+00:00): What?
kingkingHK (2026-03-12 12:48:22+00:00): Reverted for now, will manually review and repair later if needed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179756797
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 07:03:59+00:00): What?
kingkingHK (2026-03-12 12:48:05+00:00): Reverted for now, will manually review and repair later if needed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179756781
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 07:10:22+00:00): What are you doing?
kingkingHK (2026-03-12 12:37:43+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179755086 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.