piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nevw (2023-12-07 11:44:08+00:00): This number is listed against 100 St Johns Rd, Cabramatta NSW 2166, Australia which is probably the current Fire Station.
So I’ll delete the number.
Tks, Nev
nevw (2023-12-07 11:48:24+00:00): Fixed now.
nevw (2023-12-07 12:00:20+00:00): Fire station is fully mapped at the current location 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/764309959#map=19/-33.88880/150.92401&layers=D
ivanbranco (2023-12-10 22:02:16+00:00): Ciao Adele, cosa sono queste way?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1228938869/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1229015547/history

vedo inoltre dei changeset chiamati "indoor test", per favore non caricare test nel database pubblico accessibile a tutti. Se hai domande é meglio utilizzare il forum
Adele Meucci (2023-12-11 09:25:32+00:00): Ciao Ivan, 
non so bene nemmeno io cosa siano quelle way, c'erano già... le ho soltanto cambiate di livello. 
Ho sistemato il contorno del piano terra dell'edificio dell'università di ingegneria di Santa Marta e creato i contorni dei piani primo, secondo e seminterrato sulla base di planimetrie jpg. Sono dell'università di Firenze, del laboratorio di Geomatica e i prossimi gg faremo un'esperienza di mappatura indoor con gli studenti, su Santa Marta appunto. Ho sistemato tutti i contorni dei piani dell'edificio per impostare il lavoro. Nel farlo, per creare i nuovi contorni dei livelli superiori (primo e secondo), su ho OsmInEdit ho usato la possibilità di "copiare" i contorni del piano terra come base di appoggio di partenza. Oltre a copiare sul level 1 il contorno dell'edificio ha copiato anche altri oggetti che erano all'esterno (es. il poligono del parco, i percorsi pedonali e queste way), le quindi cambiate di livello, da level 1 a level 0... non so effettivamente se era il metodo giusto di procedere... 

Adele
gscholz (2023-12-10 08:48:47+00:00): Hi montsec66,
this changeset has created errors regarding overlapping ways (blue marker):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=1.79835&lat=42.35605&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144819980

A you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-12-12 13:36:21+00:00): Hi montsec66, 
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
eggie (2023-12-06 10:59:18+00:00): Dag blaaass   Kijk even hier hoe een b@b te mappen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house

MVG
eggie
bbaassssiiee (2023-12-06 11:16:31+00:00): Dankjewel eggie! Ga ik doen...
goedegazelle (2023-12-06 11:33:20+00:00): Als ik de foto op de website bekijk dan denk ik dat dit de juiste bouwlagen zijn voor de b&b:

building:levels=1
roof:levels=1
maraf24 (2023-12-06 22:12:49+00:00): źródło tej zmiany? Bo UM nie potwierdza. Zakres nazw określa tu zakres działek, w terenie pewnie nie ma zaznaczonej granicy.
pavvv (2023-12-07 06:57:06+00:00): uznałem, że nazwy zmieniają się na granicy osiedli
maraf24 (2023-12-07 19:58:52+00:00): Najpierw były nazwy ulic, a później granice osiedli.
SekeRob (2023-12-07 17:39:08+00:00): Ciao,

Perché le descrizioni dei set di modifiche sono solo 'a' o 'z'? Per favore, fornisci delle descrizioni adeguate o dovremo annullare le modifiche senza sapere perché l'hai fatto.

Grazie

PS hai salvato le modifiche elencando diversi avvisi che l'editor ID segnala "prima" del caricamento!
BCNorwich (2023-12-07 10:36:27+00:00): Hi, These do not look like unclassified highways.  There are a small number of paths but mostly these are the dividing lines of rice fields. On the imagery the darker lines are streams or irrigation ditches. Leaving these as unclassified highways is going to disrupt routing, thus they ought be removed.

Regards Bernard.
michalsochacki (2023-12-11 20:45:25+00:00): W uchwale pisze że to droga wewnętrzna. Czy według Ciebie zalicza się ona do tej kategorii aby zaktualizować OSM?
Frans S (2023-12-08 10:24:38+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Not accurate mapped buildings
Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144820558
silversurfer83 (2023-12-07 09:34:27+00:00): Gude und willkommen bei OSM

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht. Ich mach das mal.

Sieht gut aus. Du hast das Wiki genau so interpretiert wie ich auch.

Happy Mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144820559
BCNorwich (2023-12-07 10:40:42+00:00): Hi, Please do not use descriptions as formal names. Also most of most of these highways are actually divisions between rice or paddy fields. Could you please amend or correct your mapping?

Regards Bernard.
muralito (2023-12-06 19:58:51+00:00): Hi. Why did you map this as village?
It does not has the required population for that.
silversurfer83 (2023-12-06 13:17:04+00:00): Moin :)

du hast hier einen Weg entfernt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/145477723
auch in dieser Ansicht gut zu sehen:
https://osmcha.org/changesets/144820953

Auf dem Luftbild Hessen DOP ist der Weg aber sehr gut sichtbar. Daher meine Frage: Warum hast du ihn gelöscht?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144820953
gscholz (2023-12-08 11:14:32+00:00): Hi montsec66,
your recent edits have left behind errors regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=1.61887&lat=42.36027&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144821162

As yo may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-12-10 02:16:07+00:00): 您好，感谢您为OSM做出贡献，但下次在湖南和山东的编辑最好分别存两次，不然就会构成一个巨大的边界，把河南湖北都包进去，河南和湖北的人看本地历史记录的时候就会看到这个changeset并摸不着头脑了
Frans S (2023-12-08 11:02:18+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, do not cluster buildings and map them as 1 building.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144821463
user_5359 (2023-12-07 07:45:39+00:00): Hello! I remove your „business“ entry (to much foreign keys). Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org!
If you need help, You are welcome!

Are you toilet or a company that rents out toilets?
Frans S (2023-12-08 11:01:08+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings not accurate mapped.
Buildings not squared at all !


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144821512
Frans S (2023-12-08 10:59:23+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings not accurate mapped and squared.
Oversized buildings.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144821591
Frans S (2023-12-08 10:57:41+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
not accurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144821595
Frans S (2023-12-08 10:56:26+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144821656
Frans S (2023-12-08 10:55:20+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, not all buildings squared

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144821718
Frans S (2023-12-08 10:54:08+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, not all squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144821723
Frans S (2023-12-08 10:40:11+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Not squared buildidngs.
Nodes of close by buildings connected.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144821724
Frans S (2023-12-08 10:38:21+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144821763
Frans S (2023-12-08 10:37:41+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
not accurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.
Connected nodes of buildings to other buildings


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144821781
Frans S (2023-12-08 10:36:18+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
buildings not squared.
Don't add name tag name=q  ! This says nothing and had to be avoid.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144821783
Frans S (2023-12-08 10:33:52+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
mappings not accurate.
Buildings not squared
Collected multiple buildings and mapped as 1 building


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144821791
Frans S (2023-12-08 10:29:58+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144821864
martinst (2023-12-06 12:04:45+00:00): access=no mit den angegebenen Ausnahmen schließt z.B. jegliche Nutzung durch motorisierte Fahrzeuge aus. (Und der Weg wird in der Standardkarte nur blass dargestellt.)

Je nach Beschilderung vor Ort wäre motor_vehicle=agrigultural;forestry hier vorzuziehen,  siehe OSM-Wiki.
kletzen (2023-12-07 07:48:56+00:00): Das Kriterium LAnd/Forstwirtschaftlicher Verkehr kann ich leider nicht auswählen, erschein bei mir nicht...oder ich such an der falschen Stellen
martinst (2023-12-07 09:21:47+00:00): Im iD-Editor unter "Tags" werden bei der Eingabe von "motor_vehicle" weitere Vorschläge gemacht, es gibt aber keine Kombinationen wie "agricultural;forestry", die muss man händisch eingeben.

Wie genau einzutragen ist steht hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:motor_vehicle
eggie (2023-12-06 10:56:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Is dit een serieuze bijdrage? 
Waarom zou "Boshut" Forest Hut ? een attractie zijn?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-12-06 11:00:46+00:00): Het park heb ik naar het vlak verplaatst
eggie (2023-12-06 11:06:17+00:00): Is de Boshut wellicht een amenity=shelter ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dshelter

MVG
eggie
Genieirock (2023-12-06 11:39:38+00:00): "Shelter" is ook prima. Het gaat om een boshut vol kabouters en andere leuke decoraties in een kabouter-thema. Er hangen ook kaarten aan de muur en er is verder ook andere toeristische informatie beschikbaar om mee te nemen.
goedegazelle (2023-12-06 11:19:20+00:00): Een "paddock" kan worden aangegeven met:
landuse=meadow
meadow=paddock
VLD549 (2024-01-24 17:26:56+00:00): Hi, the source indicates it to be Kleuterschool Groenendaal Merksem. Could you indicate why the name was chosen to be Kleuterschool Groenendaal Campus Stella-Maris?
Thank you!
joost schouppe (2024-01-25 12:11:27+00:00): Thanks for the review! I was unable to find out where I got this from, so I've renamed it to what the website is using.
VLD549 (2024-03-06 15:48:40+00:00): Great!
BCNorwich (2023-12-07 07:37:33+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed your new long kerb as it inadvertently crosses several buildings.

Regards Bernard.
Negreheb (2023-12-07 11:09:30+00:00): It looks like you import a lot of stuff from a website. Did you check if the licence allows an import?
Just because its available as website it does not mean you should import the data into OSM. 

Please answer this question otherwise i have to inform the DWG.
Negreheb (2023-12-07 11:23:42+00:00): That message was a bit harsh, i realized. Sorry for that. But i think you should probably follow the importing guidelines, i linked them in the thread i created in the forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/user-importing-prison-names-from-official-websites-and-sometimes-deleting-valid-stuff-by-mistake/106778
DavidKarlas (2023-12-07 17:36:23+00:00): Did you delete https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1268072 intentionally?
desk77 (2023-12-07 19:20:47+00:00): No. It was probably done by mistake.
user_5359 (2023-12-08 16:15:11+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1229030774 (one of one hundred ninety-eight objects). What is the mean of the tag hedge_bank = yes? Did you mean hedge=headge_bank (see https://taginfo.osm.org/keys/hedge#values)?
Mevess (2023-12-09 15:14:16+00:00): wooops well spotted!
I will fix that
thanks
Mevess (2023-12-09 15:18:12+00:00): fixed in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144938313
flohoff (2023-12-06 13:54:10+00:00): Hi,
deine änderungen (Nicht notwendigerweise dieser Changeset) hier in Mönninghausen haben dazu geführt das nicht mehr die Landstraße durch den Ort genutzt wird sondern die route abgekürzt wird:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=546622,602687#51.6677,8.46084,15z

Ich versuche mal die "Helle" schlechter zu machen.

Was mir aufgefallen ist ist das du hier eine Verkehrsinsel durch auftrennen der Richtungsfahrbahnen gemacht hast. Warum nicht einfach ein traffic_calming=island?

Den hier meine ich.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.67286&mlon=8.45166#map=19/51.67286/8.45166&layers=N

Der node mit dem traffic_calming=island wäre doch ein viel einfachereres Datenmodell.
Zusätzlich dann eben ein pedestrian crossing mit island=yes und gut.

Komplette notification war hier:

https://gt.owl.de/pipermail/osm-owl-routeqa/2023-December/091925.html

Flo
flohoff (2023-12-06 14:24:13+00:00): Hat geklappt - Ist eben zurück geschwenkt:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=602687,602764#51.67406,8.45537,17z


https://gt.owl.de/pipermail/osm-owl-routeqa/2023-December/091928.html
MaciekMma (2023-12-07 11:35:36+00:00): Jestes pewien? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lLWbEVKfnU
MaciekMma (2023-12-07 11:36:54+00:00): bo na filmie widac wyraznie ze prace ida pelna para
MaciekMma (2023-12-07 11:40:34+00:00): poza zmiana z construction->proposed usunales rowniez kilka tagow, przywroc je prosze
mfimp2 (2023-12-08 20:18:02+00:00): Jestem pewien. Na dostępnych legalnych źródłach budowy mostu nie ma, a na dostępnych legalnych jak ten film z Youtube również nie ma.
mfimp2 (2023-12-08 20:26:23+00:00): Dla jasności: by mówić o budowie mostu, muszą być najpierw przyczółki zbudowane.  Tych jeszcze nie ma.
Drogi na moście. Te można budować, gdy most jest.
A nawierzchnię dostają na koniec. Organizacja ruchu (oneway) obowiazuje zaś po oddaniu drogi.
Podsumowując: mapujesz przyszłość. Tym samym wprowadzasz użytkowników mapy w błąd.
mfimp2 (2023-12-08 21:05:34+00:00): *a na dostępnych NIElegalnych jak ten film z Youtube również nie ma.

Bo Youtube nie jest dozwolony do mapowania.

Poza tym jest tu oczywista niezgodność czasowa. Most w budowie dodałeś 2 miesiące temu, a film jest sprzed 10 dni. 
Jakie więc było to źródło sprzed 2 miesięcy?