piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:25:09+00:00): ти паскудиш мапу!
danbjoseph (2023-07-14 13:54:44+00:00): hi Erika, please make sure you square your buildings and tag them with "building=yes"
please watch this video for a refresher
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSLe6rjtgi0
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:42:57+00:00): москальска гнида!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:50:58+00:00): Абетку вивчив, засланець сраний? "Посьолок" додаєш?
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:53:28+00:00): Стройка у тебе в дупі!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:58:20+00:00): Ти не любиш людей, гівнюк!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:05:30+00:00): В країні війна, а ти москалькі імена даєш мапі, похуй як вони називаються групою людей, якщо по докам немає таких назв, на вулиці немає таких вказівників і написів - це твоя вигадка! "Стройка", тьху, блять!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:11:06+00:00): твої потуги нікому не потрібні
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:27:10+00:00): ти шкідник 100%
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:12:55+00:00): вандал і сволота ти!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:19:36+00:00): те що ти робиш - гидота
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:23:29+00:00): Актуалізатор, як у тебе справи з граматикою? "Стройка" знову у тебе?
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:51:24+00:00): тварюка
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:25:11+00:00): ненавиджу тебе, собака
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:20:32+00:00): покайся!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:26:23+00:00): за русизми тобі піздєць
YoungHiro45 (2023-07-13 20:45:59+00:00): *Removed way that wasn't visible in the imagery and merged nodes that were near each other. 

I accidentally pressed upload while changing the comment
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138479495
silversurfer83 (2023-07-14 07:18:05+00:00): Moin :)
Schön, dass du/ihr mithelft die Karte besser zu machen.
Habt ihr mal einen Link zu dem Spielplatzbedarfsplan? Da würde mich nähmlich mal die Lizenz interessieren, da diese zur ODbL von OpenStreetMap kompatibel sein muss um als Quelle genutzt zu werden...

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138479907
Menschen- und Naturfreunde Scharpenacken (2023-07-17 05:51:05+00:00): https://ris.wuppertal.de/vo0050.asp?__kvonr=25747
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138479907
Menschen- und Naturfreunde Scharpenacken (2023-07-17 06:07:45+00:00): Da Spielplätze deine Leidenschaft sind, wäre es schön, hier etwas Hilfe zu bekommen. Es gibt in Wuppertal noch viele Spielplätze, die nur als Node und nicht als Area existieren: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1xtU
Habe bei der Stadt nach offenen Daten zum Spielflächenbedarfsplan angefragt, aber noch keine Antwort erhalten. Würde die Nodes gerne, so weit wie möglich, durch Areas ersetzen... 
Es gibt in Wuppertal auch Patenschaften für Spielplätze. Gibt es für sowas einen Tag?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138479907
lymkwi (2023-07-13 20:45:43+00:00): Oops, actually uploaded two missing bicycle parking spaces instead. My bad!
woodpeck_repair (2023-07-14 07:20:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138492359 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mechanical edits by Krako73
James Harms (2023-07-13 21:06:42+00:00): This looks so big because there was an error that when I reloaded it showed the map near Somaliland or something, and I fixed an issure there.
woodpeck_repair (2023-07-14 07:20:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138492359 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mechanical edits by Krako73
woodpeck_repair (2023-07-14 07:20:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138492359 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mechanical edits by Krako73
gscholz (2023-07-15 06:37:55+00:00): Hi charles ,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=36.92156&lat=5.16108&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=138481055

I have reverted it to fix those issues.
Guido
charles chilufya (2023-07-15 06:48:49+00:00): Alright noted. Should be the imagery i used. I was on Esri world imagery. How did you manage with Maxar? Because it has issues and i used alternative Esri imagery which was closer suiting maxar.
Langlaeufer (2023-07-14 10:04:58+00:00): service=busway ist deprecated
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dbusway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138481088
Langlaeufer (2023-07-14 10:06:27+00:00): Ach war ja mein Fehler :0. Danke fürs berichtigen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138481088
woodpeck_repair (2023-07-14 07:20:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138492359 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mechanical edits by Krako73
multimodaal (2023-07-13 21:37:19+00:00): Je hebt hier ten onrechte de landuse-informatie en de camp_site tag weggegooid. Dit is teruggedraaid. Dit is geen pitch zoals bedoeld in de wiki en scoutin is geen sport zoals bedoeld in de key:sport.  He is een camp_site, zoals ook aangegeven op de website van het eiland.

Wil je je ajb aan de taggingafspraken houden en geen correcte data weggooien? Bij twijfel kan je altijd in de geschiedenis kijken en de mapper benaderen die de vorige tags heeft geplaatst.

Als je daar geen zin in hebt, ook goed, maar blijf dan met je handen van bestaande data af.

Zie v9 en v10 in https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/1398699
multimodaal (2023-07-22 12:42:01+00:00): commentaar hierboven was bedoeld op changeset van andere mapper :  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138023494
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-14 00:20:19+00:00): cartpaths should not be named.  Also, bridges should be added where it goes over water, as appropriate.
jmarchon (2023-07-15 08:09:04+00:00): Hello,
Is "Neighborhood Connector" actually the name of this path?
Happy mapping!
jmarchon (2023-07-18 19:42:36+00:00): I've removed the suspicious names due to lack of a response.
Kai Johnson (2023-07-14 14:43:12+00:00): I think the geological=landslide tag should be restored here, since the hazard=landslide tag refers to the location of signage indicating where landslides are common, and these features are not signs but the debris fields from prior landslide events.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138481633
eggie (2023-07-14 05:36:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback:  Alle begin is moeilijk. Een tuin zo intekenen kan prima, maar en adres hoort niet op een vlak. Er is een adresnode. Ook is het adres niet de naam van het terrein.
Ik heb het adres verwijderd. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
suchAnight (2023-07-14 15:50:18+00:00): Resource correction: Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-07-06
eggie (2023-07-14 05:38:36+00:00): Dag Linus... Het adres heb ik verwijderd. Zie commentaar voorgaande changeset.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-14 05:43:04+00:00): De afrastering  passeert de oprijlaan... 
Wellicht hoort daar op de oprijlaan een node met de tag barrier=gate in?
De oprijlaan zou je kunnen intekenen  met highway=service  service=driveway access=private
Kai Johnson (2023-07-14 05:16:45+00:00): Can we talk about the large scale change of natural=landslide to hazard=landslide? The way I understand the keys, hazard=* is for things that are an imminent danger. If a landslide is old enough that it hasn't moved significantly in a long time, it doesn't seem to present any imminent danger. That would seem to be the case for many (all?) of these features. In this case, the natural=landslide tag seems to be describing the landform created by the landslide. Were you thinking something else?
woodpeck (2023-07-14 07:04:44+00:00): Dear Krako73, I have reverted the recent edits you made with the "Level0" editor as these are clearly undiscussed mechanical edits. Please restrain your clean-up efforts and make sure that if you do change the tags of something thousands of miles away from where you live that your changes are accurate for the concrete object in question, and not just based on some algorithm that you have come up with. If you do (want to make changes based on an algorithm) then this has to be discussed with the community in advance: "Hey folks, I was thinking of changing all objects tagged X and also Y to Z, what do you think" and then when there's agreement you can proceed. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits for details.
empty_child (2023-07-14 09:40:45+00:00): Hello PapaTours,
Thank you for contributions
Please, do not create copies of existing objects. Café Fantasia with correct links to wiki already exists
PapaTours (2023-07-14 14:09:11+00:00): Hello, I've just signed Batumi Octopus, not the Cafe itself.
empty_child (2023-07-14 14:43:57+00:00): Café Fantasy is an official name of Octopus. Octopus or რვაფეხა is a loc_name, no more
wireguy (2023-11-20 21:31:58+00:00): Pete: did you really want a building tag on this way, or maybe something else? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22746551
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-13 22:23:54+00:00): See https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/1021250484 for the previous history of this way.  One protagonist here is clearly not going to like the tunnel tag, but it does appear that _everyone else_ disagrees with that.
Hungerburg (2023-07-13 22:29:45+00:00): I say, culvert is a good match with what I can read from the pictures. The thing might not be a tunnel in engineering terms, but it certainly is one in OSM lingo.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-07-17 14:16:21+00:00): que pontos são esses? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11045436425
Felipe Ferreira Monteiro (2024-07-17 20:19:41+00:00): foram edificações identificadas em levantamento de campo
InfosReseaux (2024-05-30 10:30:57+00:00): Hello !

I've noticed some power=pole + utility=telecom;power in this changeset.
As per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dutility_pole#Logical_link_between_poles_and_supported_features, it is recommended to only use utility=* with a single value.

utility=power is implied by power=pole whether they support telecom lines or not.
Is it possible to remove it please?
:-} (2023-07-14 08:58:12+00:00): Zapomniałeś dodać construction=trunk w kierunku Gdańska
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-14 01:57:32+00:00): As with all the others, the cartpaths should not be named.  Also, do not "lollipop" features such as the fairway around the sand bunker.
mueschel (2023-07-14 08:42:13+00:00): Hi,
something went wrong here. You uploaded a huge amount of objects without any proper tag.
What is the source of all this data?
Where can we find the required documentation of the import?

Please check the import guidelines to see how importing data to OSM works.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
user_5359 (2023-07-14 14:50:52+00:00): Hello,

In comparison with the aerial photo, you seem to have tried to import building outlines (presumably with automatic image recognition). The question remains open whether the procedure was coordinated and the source images were approved for this processing. And when are the correct tags set and the superfluous ones deleted?

tradução automática 

Hi,
algo correu mal aqui. Carregou uma enorme quantidade de objectos sem qualquer etiqueta adequada.
Qual é a fonte de todos estes dados?
Onde é que podemos encontrar a documentação necessária para a importação?

Consulte as directrizes de importação para saber como funciona a importação de dados para o OSM.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Olá,
Em comparação com a fotografia aérea, parece ter tentado importar os contornos dos edifícios (presumivelmente com reconhecimento automático de imagem). Resta saber se o procedimento foi coordenado e se as imagens de origem foram aprovadas para este processamento. E quando são definidas as etiquetas correctas e eliminadas as supérfluas?
Felipe Ferreira Monteiro (2023-07-14 16:29:36+00:00): Estou trabalhando para região em estudo urbano ambiental e os polígonos já estão sendo ajustados para correta classificação.
user_5359 (2023-07-14 17:50:28+00:00): Unfortunately, your answer does not clarify any of our questions. There is also another user who uses similar keys.

izmente, a sua resposta não esclarece nenhuma das nossas questões. Há também outro utilizador que utiliza chaves semelhantes.
mueschel (2023-07-16 10:11:55+00:00): I checked the footprints of buildings: The validator shows 100 errors and more than 3000 warnings about the geometry. Many of the objects don't fit with what is visible on aerial images. I'm going to revert these edits for now. Please feel free to import the objects again after all necessary clean-up and sanity checks and after you consulted and fulfilled the OSM Import Guidelines.
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-14 01:56:08+00:00): Hi again...  Please do not use descriptive tags to describe a cartpath.  It has been addressed.  Also, the sections that are a bridge over water should be changed to a bridge.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138484184
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-14 01:58:27+00:00): Again, do not name cartpaths.  this changeset has been reverted in part or full.
Larmax (2023-07-17 18:56:05+00:00): Hi, places ending in "-örarna" (Swedish for "the islands") are groups of islands so a better tag would be place=archipelago than place=yes
Thundercel (2023-07-15 14:33:55+00:00): Bom dia Adriano.
Já liberaram o treco em obras de implantação abaixo?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1059663144
Não identifiquei qualquer indicação da liberação dele.
Thundercel (2023-07-15 14:44:50+00:00): Pergunto porque costumo, como também editor do APP Waze, identifico que nele esse segmento de via se encontra ainda bloqueado.
Thundercel (2023-07-15 14:52:17+00:00): Andei lendo também:
https://portallitoralsul.com.br/anel-de-contorno-viario-de-florianopolis-so-em-2024/
adrianojbr (2023-07-15 23:45:20+00:00): Olá!

Eu passei lá há algumas semanas. Está parcialmente liberado, conforme https://www.contornodeflorianopolis.com.br/desvio-do-transito-no-km-18-da-br-282-foi-executado-na-quinta-feira-27-de-abril/

Aliás, parece que no Waze também já está liberado: 
https://www.waze.com/en/live-map/directions?latlng=-27.67717687102583%2C-48.700686693191535&overlay=false&utm_campaign=default&utm_medium=wme_footer&utm_source=waze_website

Abraço!
Thundercel (2023-07-15 23:53:33+00:00): Bem, só verifiquei o Waze quando lhe enviei a msg mais cedo, e por ele não estava liberado o trecho final. Pesquisei na net e vi materia que a empresa contratada informou que as obras de todo contorno só serão concluidas em 2024. Não citou esse pequeno trecho, só toda a obra.
Thundercel (2023-07-15 23:56:00+00:00): Em tempo. vi agora no waze e liberou o segmento.
Thundercel (2023-07-16 00:04:15+00:00): Só identifico no waze agora que esta liberado o trecho porém ele apresenta dois retornos ali dentro. Observe que esses retornos, se realmente existem, não foram incluidos no OSM.
https://www.gpsinfo.com.br/waze.jpg
adrianojbr (2023-07-16 17:31:18+00:00): São locais diferentes. Esse último que você aponta é aqui no OSM: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/554907569/history#map=19/-27.66828/-48.69032.

A respeito das obras do contorno viário, realmente a conclusão delas deve demorar. Porém, o local inicialmente apontado deve ter sido modificado justamente por causa dessas obras, haja vista a construção de trevo ali, conforme: https://www.contornodeflorianopolis.com.br/obra-do-trevo-de-intersecao-do-contorno-viario-de-florianopolis-com-a-br-282-avanca-e-entra-em-nova-fase/

Abraço!
RedEyedVireo (2023-07-14 12:50:51+00:00): Hi,

I noticed that you changed parts of the Mass Central Rail Trail from highway=cycleway to highway=path. Since highway=path is a very generic tag that is commonly used on small hiking trails in the woods. It makes it hard for cyclists to find the rail trail on cycling maps. 

For the rail trails in mass the convention is to use highway=cycleway with foot=yes so that the rail trails will show up on dedicated cycling maps but it is also indicated that walking/running is ok too.

If you could ether revert this changeset or submit a new changeset that resets the rail trail to highway=cycleway and foot=yes it would be appreciated.

I also saw that you changed ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229841698 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229841699 that were tagged with highway=bridleway to highway=path. This is fine if these are just foot paths in the woods. Plus I doubt they are restricted to horses only.

If you have any questions feel free to ask.

Thanks for your cooperation,
RedEyedVireo
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-07-18 06:44:55+00:00): Bạn ơi, bạn edit nhiều quá xóa mất member của 2 cái relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15091212 - 12026529 rồi.
adrianojbr (2023-07-14 12:34:57+00:00): Olá, Victor!

bridge=viaduct é um falso cognato, conforme https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:bridge%3Dviaduct

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138486594
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-24 08:43:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11045660497 - are you sure that it is shop=clothes?

Maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Doutpost would fit better if that is place that has meager supply of products (or none) but allows pick up of orderer products?
LidaCity (2025-02-10 07:07:19+00:00): thanks, fix
gogorm (2023-07-15 20:46:02+00:00): Is there really an ATM here?
Frans S (2023-08-12 12:53:13+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please do not add a layer to a building to get rid of an error that a road is crossing a building.
Unfortunately, the possibility to adjust the routing of the road is blocked. (Project = buildings only)
We (validators) solve these issues.
Best regards
Faheem Chui (2023-08-12 16:55:49+00:00): Thanks for commenting my previous changeset. I will not add layer to get rid of an error for performing bad mapping skills. Thanks for  reminding for avoiding mistakes. Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138486933
Dimacn (2023-07-21 12:30:38+00:00): Пожалуйста почитайте о классификации дорог в osm - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification В данном случае, изменённая вами дорога, должна быть highway=service, как и была до вас
hatul (2023-07-26 10:04:33+00:00): בבקשה לא להוסיף נקודות להוראות נסיעה, המפה לא מיועדת לכך
PerpetualHiker (2023-08-01 21:20:29+00:00): Hi samsung galaxy s6,

I noticed this ferry route, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/630066491, was changed to disused:ferry=route citing only Esri World Imagery. Would you be able to provide a source that confirms the closure of this ferry route?

If the route is indeed closed, then we could make the same update to the ferry route relation, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12481014. 

I look forward to hearing from you!
MxxCon (2023-07-14 05:14:24+00:00): Hello.
This changeset will be reverted in full since you did not enter a single correct OSM tag.
Please take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/ for instructions on how to correctly map features.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138487762
user_8655426 (2023-07-14 11:14:18+00:00): Hello,
MAPS.ME uses map data from OpenStreetMap (OSM). If you add an object to MAPS.ME it will be added to OSM as well.
"OSM is a place for mapping things that are both real and current."
https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome

You have added many ATMs to OSM.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Liel_Salaan/history

Do they really exist? Or are they your personal markers?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138488061
arjunaraoc (2023-07-14 07:13:51+00:00): Thanks for requesting review.  I have reviewed your edits. I think it may not be easy to get barrier information from imagery.  Unless you have direct local knowledge of the area, it may be better to omit barrier tagging.
manishjaishwal (2023-07-18 05:07:45+00:00): Hey , Thanks for your review ,we have  streetview data collected from our internal organisation.I have proof of barrier at that locations.
arjunaraoc (2023-07-19 07:40:53+00:00): Thanks for your response. Are you part of organized editing? If so can you add your oragnisation details on wiki as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities
user_1566574 (2023-08-01 12:40:09+00:00): Hi!
Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11045783094, I move it a little bit on the left, on the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1110738187, because it seems to be the new location since 2018 (+ photo from the 2 previous weeks seems to confirm that). Edits will be published soon today, let me know if I'm wrong!
Thanks for your edits!
user_1566574 (2023-12-01 15:03:12+00:00): Hi,
Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11045797942, I'm about to delete it because it's already existing at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9421721826

Thanks!
user_1566574 (2023-12-01 15:05:36+00:00): Well, actually I'm gonna remove most of the things you added because they are duplicated... Please, be more careful next time, or if you edit using OsmAnd, be careful having an outdated map/datas.

Please get in touch with community if you need help contributing. Thank you!
ramseraph1 (2023-11-15 08:34:22+00:00): Hi, the Itanagar capital complex district was a proposed district and not an actual district. The fact that it has not made it to https://lgdirectory.gov.in/ and it has not been in the Arunachal District reorganization act  - https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/11345/1/the_arunachal_pradesh_%28reorganisation_of_districts%29_act_1980_as_amended.pdf is proof for that. I am going to wait a little for any counter arguments, otherwise I am going to go ahead and delete the relation. Thanks
Dimacn (2023-07-17 19:29:12+00:00): Пожалуйста почитайте о классификации дорог в osm - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification В данном случае, добавленная вами дорога, должна быть highway=service
imperiumultimum (2024-02-14 15:25:07+00:00): Why did you change the border here? It was already correct as it follows the bend on the Sana river past the village of Dubocani.
imperiumultimum (2024-03-13 21:22:08+00:00): Since you did not respond I reverted to the previous, correct version.
Gontsa (2023-07-14 14:49:37+00:00): This is the official renaming of the street, approved by the Cherkasy City Council https://chmr.golos.net.ua/?p=proekty_rishen&sp=single&id=10338 Why did you roll back the changes?
silversurfer83 (2023-07-14 07:05:25+00:00): Moin Justinbrd,

was du hier bearbeitet hast war ein Teil des Tankstellengebäudes, welches als Gebäudeteil (building:part=roof) gekennzeichnet war. Am Gesamtgebäude sind schon alle Informationen zur Tankstelle hinterlegt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/91651157/
Ich habe deine Änderung wieder rückgängig gemacht.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138490397