piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2024-05-15 11:10:50+00:00): Kwartje valt nog niet bij mij. 

Oke, maar de weg is daar gewoon enkelvoudig getekend met 2 rijstroken lanes=2
Ik kan in de routering daar geen fouten vinden.. Zijstraten zijn er ook niet.
eggie (2024-05-15 11:12:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=51.80996%2C5.82832%3B51.81321%2C5.83495

en

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=51.81321%2C5.83495%3B51.80996%2C5.82832
eggie (2024-05-15 11:15:42+00:00): Probeer de groene en de rode marker te verschuiven en kijk wat de routering doet.
A67-A67 (2024-05-15 17:05:44+00:00): Staat de S104 inmiddels wel op de bewegwijzering? Dat was een paar jaar geleden, na de invoering van de S-nummering, namelijk niet zo.

Zo ja, dan zal de gehele weg moeten worden getagd met ref=S104, niet alleen dit wegdeel. Ook worden S- en R-nummers al vrij lang met een hoofdletter geschreven. In Nijmegen hebben nooit S-nummers met een kleine letter s bestaan.
eggie (2024-05-15 17:44:32+00:00): Ahh.. het gaat over deze opmerking. Hier gaat medemapper Leo er vanuit dat je op het fietspad rijdt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4246972#map=18/51.81235/5.83344&layers=N
eggie (2024-05-15 18:36:22+00:00): Voorlopig even de ref verwijderd ivm niet consistente tagging.
Bij meer informatie (staat de ref S104 aangegeven?) wil ik het wel aanpassen.
jaap de vries (2024-05-16 08:23:04+00:00): Even inbreken als Nijmegenaar. Enkel de S 100 route staat op vrijwel alle verkeersborden langs deze route of die deze route kruisen of op toegangswegen naar de stad toe. De overige S wegen staan niet op de bebording in de stad. Staan ook het Hoofdletter S beschreven.
eggie (2024-05-16 08:58:56+00:00): Hoi Jaap...   Merkwaardig. .. Dan maar even zo laten.
Wellicht wordt ooit de bebording nog aangepast?
In dat geval kan het zo aangepast worden. 
Groet en bedankt voor je info.
eggie
eggie (2024-05-15 08:43:23+00:00): Beste Patrick.. Geloof me access=no icm foot=yes  is bijna altijd fout.
access=no is algemeen Verboden toegang. Bv op Militair terrein. 

De juiste tag moet vehicle=no zijn.

motor_vehicle=no en bicycle=no kan evt ook als je in de editor die tag niet kunt vinden.
Bij access=no verdwijnen de paden ook bijna van de kaart, want ze doen er niet meer toe.
MVG
eggie

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-15 08:47:26+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast met vehicle=no 
.. foot=yes hoeft niet op tracks. Dat is default.
Op een highway=path kun je wel evt foot=yes of no  en bicycle=no of yes toevoegen. 

Mapse
eggie
Dindia (2024-05-15 19:43:06+00:00): Are you sure there's a path? Did you personally visit it? I cycled there today and couldn't find it.
Sanniu (2024-05-16 05:36:43+00:00): That was minor geometry change based on aerial - eliminated crossing without connection, according to images there is a new road, but not clean enough to map.
eggie (2024-05-15 08:57:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-15 08:59:00+00:00): 151337568 151333032 151331876 151331554 151329636 151324142 151208300 151200803 151198550 151197863 151195643 151170490 151170213 151169690 151169414
Shandhivya (2024-05-15 13:42:08+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151347968
tux67 (2024-05-15 14:18:58+00:00): Hi, any particular reason why you looked at this CS? 
BR
tux67
Shandhivya (2024-05-16 06:11:07+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great, OMGURU
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151348102
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-05-15 09:56:56+00:00): Hi Takyk, 
I have seen that you have changed admin_level for Arkadag şäheri from 6 to 4. I can not access the webpage you have added as a source. Can you please recheck your edit and if this still needs to be admin_level=4 relation, then adjust the boundaries of other admin_level=4 relations, now there is an overlap.
eggie (2024-05-15 10:11:21+00:00): Dag OBC  In OSM Nederland korten we namen niet af. Dis het woord straat niet afkorten. 
'k Den dat die straat met die parkeerplaatsen een highway=service is.

MVG
eggie
zorglubu (2024-05-15 13:40:35+00:00): Hello uganchan, try to make modifications in a small area, and to save it before going somewhere else. As you can see here, a modification in Norge and in the US cover the world, and people surveying small areas in France, Great Britain or Canada recieve a notification ;-)
Thank you.
cs09736 (2024-05-25 23:53:16+00:00): Hi there,
Please refrain from adding descriptions of objects to its 'name' tag, as is done on the elevators and ventilation shafts.
These objects do not require a name, and the description is best suited to the 'description' tag.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

Thanks
eggie (2024-05-15 09:36:43+00:00): Zie Tag:building=storage_tank

building =  hoort ook niet op een node.
Je zou wellicht een vlak kunnen gebruiken. 
A  gas holder or gasometer is a large container in which natural gas or town gas is stored. Gasometers stores gas near atmospheric pressure - for pressurized gas holders use man_made=storage_tank. 

Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dgasometer

Ik heb het aangepast naar man_made= storage_tank
content=gas
building=yes voor de rendering.

Greetz,
eggie
jpennycook (2024-05-15 14:09:23+00:00): hi!

The aerial imagery for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475685460 shows "BUSES ONLY" written in paint on the road.  Can you confirm that this has now been removed and that all motor vehicles, not just buses, are allowed to use it?

Jon
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-18 07:50:56+00:00): Maybe we should just revert their edits if they are not responding?

Or contact DWG to apply 0-hour block?
jpennycook (2024-05-18 08:27:15+00:00): See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128703405 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122879438 for other edits where bus-only routes were changed then subsequently reverted
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-21 09:33:29+00:00): I reverted this specific edit in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151618648 as user is not responding, edit is dubious and they made problematic edits before

if you want help with reverting other edits, feel free to write to me (or write to DWG)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-21 09:34:31+00:00): Personally in this situation it seems to me that reverting other edits like this would make sense
Lewwy (2024-05-21 09:58:03+00:00): Non local being a big brain 😂🙄
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-21 13:00:45+00:00): To repeat:

The aerial imagery for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475685460 shows "BUSES ONLY" written in paint on the road. Can you confirm that this has now been removed and that all motor vehicles, not just buses, are allowed to use it?
jpennycook (2024-05-21 16:54:04+00:00): See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133152692
rskedgell (2024-07-22 07:42:29+00:00): @jpennycook and @Mateusz Konieczny - these edits and similar misguided changes to access tagging have been made because @Lewwy and others want their journeys recorded on https://busmiles.uk/ to "snap" to OpenStreetMap. It's effectively mapping for the renderer, although the Busmiles website is a little short on information about how it uses OSM data (a credit beyond that shown via Leaflet.js would be nice). It would help if Busmiles used bus route relations where its users could make genuine and useful contributions to OSM data. Instead of this, we have wild stabs in the dark at access tagging, possibly encouraged by discussion on the Busmiles Discord server.
Hidoo00 (2024-05-16 08:37:15+00:00): Hej!
Varför reverterade du ändringen? Jag ser inget politiskt i namnet, då det inte uttrycker något ställningstagande åt endera hållet. Hade även med tydliga, objektiva källor på att namnet är i bruk. Är "Knarkrondellen" politiskt eftersom det belyser stadens drogproblem?
archie (2024-05-16 08:58:32+00:00): Du lade säkert märke till citattecken i den artikel som du refererade till och vet säkerligen vad detta innebär. Att då föra in sånt i osm är en smula oseriöst, eller hur?
archie (2024-05-16 09:13:21+00:00): Förresten  gjorde jag DWG uppmärksam på detta.
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 11:27:44+00:00): Thank you for your contribution in mapping. This aquaculture ponds mapping look great and also the clear changeset comment. Keep Contributing, Cheers!!!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151349446
sauce1984 (2024-05-15 09:31:01+00:00): wäre sogar eher noch geneigt, trail-visibility auf 'no' zu setzen oder die paths ganz rauszunehmen, damit sie bei komoot oder ähnlichem nicht mit in die routenberechnung genommen werden.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-17 00:14:21+00:00): Unnecessary way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1283214342
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151350265
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-17 00:16:30+00:00): Intersection nodes should be close to the gore
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151350265
ToniE (2024-05-15 10:06:37+00:00): Servus,

das korrekte Tagging wäre hier

abandoned:highway = path

Unabhängig davon ist bei Zugangsverbot wegen Naturschutzbelangen zu prüfen, ob es ein (offizieller, teil-offizieller) Weg mit Betretungsverbot ist, oder ein Weg, der wieder zuwachsen soll, bzw. ein illegaler Trampelpfad.

Das Löschen eines solchen Weges macht lang- und mittelfristig wenig Sinn, da ein:e zufällig vorbeikommende Mapper:in den (fehlenden) Weg in OSM wieder mappen würde.

Wir haben auf dieser Basis auch eine gute Übereinkunft mit diversen Verwaltungen (Naturpark Müritz, Naturpark Sächsische Schweiz, ...), die vorhandenen und nicht illegalen Wege in OSM zu belassen und Zutrittsverbote mit access=private oder access=no zu kennzeichnen. Ignoranten, die solche Verbote, ob auf Karten oder vor Ort vermerkt, dennoch "übersehen" gibt es leider immer. 
"Blaulichtorganisationen" werden solche Wege (mit access=) im Notfall wohl ausnahmsweise nutzen dürfen und sich an den Einsatzort navigieren lassen.

Viele Grüße
Toni Erdmann, Ottobrunn
Untere Naturschutzbehörde LHM (2024-05-15 10:15:08+00:00): Hallo Toni Erdmann, danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung. In dem Fall ist es ein Illegaler Weg der zuwachsen soll.  Danke für den Hinweis. Ich hab es jetzt geändert und hoffe es passt.
Beste Grüße
Julia Zimprich (uNB)
ToniE (2024-05-15 10:18:50+00:00): Für die, die OSM als Hobby betreiben gilt: "viel Spass und nicht von anderen Karten kopieren".
Was gilt für "uNB", "ADAC", "Tourismusbüro Bad Tölz", ...?
Untere Naturschutzbehörde LHM (2024-05-15 10:34:38+00:00): Was ist damit gemeint?
ToniE (2024-05-15 10:53:57+00:00): Das war eher ein Witz.

JOSM, ein anderes PC-Tool mit dem man editieren kann, sagt auf der Begrüßungsseite:

"Die goldenen Regeln von OpenStreetMap:
Nicht von anderen Karten kopieren!
Spaß haben!"

"Nicht von anderen Karten kopieren!" immer das Copyright beachten, unter welcher Lizenz stehen die Daten: "Google" ist tabu, Adress- und Katasterdaten aus dem "Bayernatlas" sind tabu, ...

"Spass haben!" kann man auch, wenn man bei OSM dienstlich beträgt.
Untere Naturschutzbehörde LHM (2024-05-15 14:34:26+00:00): Ok, wir werden das berücksichtigen ;)
miluethi (2024-05-27 13:45:20+00:00): Naveen,

I'm going to delete your additions. The building shapes are far(!) too big. Please match the satellite imagery.
miluethi (2024-06-07 14:36:32+00:00): Hi Thiru,

You building shapes are far bigger than buildings shown on the satellite imagery. I'm going to delete them.

Please match exacly the shape on the sat imagery. Thank you.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-24 16:20:07+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1283214149/history has shop = oxygen that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=oxygen ? Is it shop name put as its type? Is it some place actually selling oxygen gas?
Kri_ttt (2024-11-25 17:42:57+00:00): Yes, the shop does sell oxygen gas for industrial use.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-06 10:15:44+00:00): What you think about using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtrade ?

And tagging it shop=trade trade=oxygen_for_industrial_use ?

(I also have seen some shops selling bottles with "high-oxygen air" as miracle cures, this also makes possible to both classify it in detail if some program supports rare values and allows to broadly support for apps supporting shop=trade and it sounds like shop=trade fits here)
miluethi (2024-05-15 13:37:40+00:00): Hi Jayalakshmi,

Please square out new building shapes in OSM and don't do any triangle building unless there is a triangle shape.

Square buildings by pressing the "Q" key in the iD editor with a selected shape.

Please don't do generic names like building 8. 

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
Jayalakshmi Murukurthi (2024-05-15 13:45:02+00:00): Hello, 
Thank you for your feedback
miluethi (2024-05-15 13:52:05+00:00): Sneha,

Your building shapes are far too big compared to the satellite imagery. I'm going to delete them.

Please square out building shapes by pressing the "Q" key after drawing a shape.

Thank you.
miluethi (2024-05-16 01:28:13+00:00): Hi Sneha,

Please square out all buildings by pressing the "Q" key with a selected building shape. 
Your shapes tend to be too big. Don't include shadows around the buildings. I had to delete quite a few of your buildings.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
miluethi (2024-05-15 13:41:14+00:00): Hi Kishore,

Please square out buildings and match exactly the satellite imagery. I'm going to delete your shapes.

To square buildings just press the "Q" with a selected building shape.
StC (2024-05-16 21:01:57+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a compromis la continuité d'un itinéraire de randonnée pédestre en lui ajoutant un chemin superflu. Je fais la réparation. Voir https://knooppuntnet.nl/fr/analysis/route/14906716/changes?pageIndex=0&impact=true pour les détails
StC (2024-05-16 21:04:25+00:00): ... et il semble qu'un itinéraire cycliste ait été impacté aussi, mais je préfère ne pas m'en occuper sans avoir le contexte
Shandhivya (2024-05-15 14:00:59+00:00): Well mapped but please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing ‘q’ on your keyboard. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151352262
dankarran (2024-05-15 11:59:28+00:00): Thanks for fixing these up
Vinber-Pro (2025-02-26 10:34:44+00:00): Attention, tu ajoutes un building dans le building :)

ce que tu voulais ajouter c'est la référence ?

à plus
Hungerburg (2024-05-16 07:29:45+00:00): Das finde ich nicht so gut. Nun ist eine Menge Information vor gewöhnlichen Konsumenten verborgen nur wegen einer Pedanterie - warum soll zB Gießerei nicht als Name eines Gebäudes durchgehen?
fs_LT (2024-05-16 07:40:04+00:00): "verborgen" mag ja sein, "Pedanterie" würde ich es jetzt nicht gerade nennen; eine der Diskussionen warum "Gießerei" nicht in den name gehört habe ich ja verlinkt; dazu geben tut es mehrere; fast alle laufen auf "kein Konsens" aber "Beschreibungen gehören nicht in den name" hinaus; im weiteren Sinn würde dann ja "Trafostation" auch in den name gehören ...?
fs_LT (2024-05-16 07:45:02+00:00): bei Sandoz in Kundl/Oberlangkampfen stehen Bezeichnungen wie "B544" überhaupt im addr:housename ...
emersonveenstra (2024-05-15 11:05:59+00:00): Pokemon Go vandalism, reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151354699
empty_child (2024-05-16 19:35:34+00:00): Добрый день
ჩიხი - это тупик, შესახვევი - переулок. Можете использовать словарик из вики (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Georgia_Abkhazia_South-Ossetia#Road_Type)
skliarovskyi (2024-05-21 19:35:47+00:00): Спасибо, за информацию, пройдусь посмотрю что я не правильно указал.
Metzor (2024-05-15 12:35:38+00:00): Hi P-D-S,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) 

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Please also have a look at this page as you use StreetComplete:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#A_changeset_made_with_StreetComplete_covers_a_massive_area%2C_why_is_this%3F_How_can_it_be_prevented%3F
Leo Slager (2024-05-17 22:12:46+00:00): Hoi davy,
Kijk hier eens wat voor fouten Mapcomplete op de kaart veroorzaakt:
De Carrefour verdwijnt van de kaart.
en dan zijn er twee driehoekige gebouwen ontstaan.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151353852
Leo Slager (2024-05-18 10:08:56+00:00): Stop met het gebruik van Mapcomplete met theme grb !!
Je denkt dat je 1 gebouw in orde maakt maar tegelijkertijd worden de aangrenzende gebouwen ernstig beschadigd.
Dus stop aub met dit soort vernielingen van de kaart.
Leo Slager (2024-05-18 10:20:44+00:00): building en building:part are restored.
davydeleeuw (2024-05-18 18:25:49+00:00): Dag Leo. Ik heb inderdaad gemerkt dat Mapcomplete soms rare dingen doet. Bedankt voor je feedback en de aanpassingen. Mijn excuses voor de overlast.
Leo Slager (2024-05-16 10:16:52+00:00): reverted this changeset, due to severe damage to the map:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151353859
ChromeLotus (2024-05-21 19:38:06+00:00): Hello tambunan_gm,

I wanted to reach out regarding the road network in Pulau Bintan. I noticed many highway features in the region were recently reclassified, mostly to primary, which left some inconsistencies in the road network. For instance, the roads surrounding these roundabouts (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543583398 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314572502) have some classification gaps leftover from recent changes. There are also classification breaks on highways at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3914046325 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4310339925. What are your thoughts on unifying the classification of these roads for smoother consistency?

Additionally, there seem to be some disagreements regarding road classification in the larger area. Some roads have undergone many class changes and it could be beneficial to bring this to the greater Indonesian OSM Community to resolve these classification disagreements. Some of the ways (such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/706693657 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/811827769) don’t appear to follow typical Highway Guidelines and community practice (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Highway_key_voting_importance and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines#Roads).

I look forward to hearing from you, and gaining some clarity on this. Have a good day!
Shandhivya (2024-05-15 13:51:07+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comments. Keep up the mapping - many thanks! #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151354439
Luzandro (2024-06-11 10:26:25+00:00): what's the point of switching the order of the access values?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151354800
Jorisbo (2024-06-12 07:33:18+00:00): Hi, no specific reason, kind regards Joris
silversurfer83 (2024-05-15 18:42:18+00:00): Hi :)

wenn du den Poller dort kennst, weißt du zufällig auch, welche(s) Verkehrszeichen den "Radweg" anzeigt?

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151355490
silversurfer83 (2024-05-15 18:42:19+00:00): Hi :)

wenn du den Poller dort kennst, weißt du zufällig auch, welche(s) Verkehrszeichen den "Radweg" anzeigt?

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151355490
meg_map (2024-05-15 19:46:27+00:00): Ich gucke nochmal nach, müsste DE:240 sein
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151355490
meg_map (2024-05-28 18:14:39+00:00): Nochmal nachgucken hat Sinn gemacht, ist nämlich nicht mal ein Radweg. Ist jetzt korrigiert eingetragen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151355490
silversurfer83 (2024-05-28 20:12:27+00:00): Top
Danke :)
akimapbuilder (2024-05-15 12:27:36+00:00): Hi! This doesn’t look like residential road, it looks more like a driveway.
eggie (2024-05-15 11:46:16+00:00): Len Je hebt hier een brug op een brug geplakt.
Wat is je bedoeling?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-15 11:55:21+00:00): Je brug verwijderd. Die lag er al.  Van alles highway=path gemaakt zodat het ook voor de fietsrouteert.
Groet
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-03 17:10:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9587698124/history

What you think about changing shop=pet_accessories to shop=pet that includes shops selling pet accessories and seems to be a standard? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=pet

Another option could be documenting at wiki shop=pet_accessories as a separate shop value.
Shandhivya (2024-05-16 06:19:58+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. #OMGURU
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151356218
dadavid (2025-08-13 11:04:09+00:00): Hi LightSpirit, 

der hier vergebene Name ist ja eher eine Beschreibung. Kann das nicht irgendwie anders im Tagging festgehalten werden? :) 

Viele Grüße

David
LightSpirit (2025-08-13 16:41:35+00:00): Hallo David

Es ist ja kein vergebener Name im herkömmlichen Sinn, deswegen in Klammern gesetzt. Geh den Weg mal, dann weißt du warum, die Absturzgefahr war für mich so groß, das ich sogar abgebrochen habe. Ich finde da reicht einfaches Tagging nicht mehr, da braucht man eine Warnung, in Form von ( Warnung ).
Hier unter folgendem Link ist eine ähnliche Situation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151356512#map=19/50.304948/7.851223

Wenn du den unteren Weg zum Soldatengrab gehst, kommst du an eine Stelle mit enormen Absturzpotenzial, sind zwar nur ca. zwei Meter in die Tiefe in den Dörsbach, aber vor und hinter der Engstelle ist der Weg in einem miserablen Zustand (Weg in sehr schlechtem Zustand).

Liebe Grüße
LightSpirit
eggie (2024-05-15 11:59:39+00:00): Welkom bij OSM 

Bedankt voor uw bijdrage,
Evt nog website=https..  en phone toevoegen.

MVG
eggie
Dodko (2024-05-16 09:05:22+00:00): Obec Kolárovice nemá pomenované ulice preto sa nepoužíva addr:street

Názov časti obce sa dáva do addr:place

name=Chata nepoužívajú sa opisné názvy

ak je tam ubytovanie na prenájom použite značku
tourism=chalet
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:tourism%3Dchalet
Shandhivya (2024-05-16 06:14:21+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great. Keep up the mapping - many thanks! #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151356751
Shandhivya (2024-05-16 05:25:00+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great. Keep up the mapping - many thanks! #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151356784
martinst (2024-05-16 18:38:29+00:00): Hallo mahau,
die Hausnummer vom gelöschten Node  11425591579 hätte schon gestimmt, beim Straßennamen ist mir damals ein Kopierfehler unterlaufen. 
Ich habe die korrekten Adressen in Changeset 151422027 wieder eingetragen.
Gruß Martin
eggie (2024-05-15 12:22:23+00:00): Dag Waayman.
Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. Is de naam van het bedrijf werkelijk name=nederlands?

MVG
eggie