piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Coinoswallet (2024-01-18 05:51:46+00:00): Yes, this place DOES accept Bitcoin as a payment option. I have been there myself as well.
PLEB⚡️PRENEUR (2024-01-18 15:52:59+00:00): These edits need to be reversed as they were verified by local mappers.
woodpeck (2024-02-07 22:03:04+00:00): CurlingMan13, please respond to these comments. Why did you revert, and if your revert was a mistake, have you taken steps to avoid these mistakes in the future?
Coinoswallet (2024-02-07 22:07:14+00:00): I have reported CurlingMan13 to OSM and I hope they ban him or suspend him ASAP so he doesn't continue to vandalize. If you guys all report him too the same way I did, that will speed up the process of his punishment.
CurlingMan13 (2024-02-07 22:22:51+00:00): The removal has already been reversed, and thus no further action is needed here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146693188

In the future, care will be taken to ensure that payment types remain correct (via phone call to business or in-person surveys).  I will not touch crypto payment types personally unless it has been verified personally (in person by me), and will comment on relevant changesets according prior to removal.

I have previously encountered seemingly organized mappers updating the "check_date=*" in an automated fashion without verification that it still (or ever) exists.  I will comment and report those organized users going forwards without reverting or touching their tags.
Coinoswallet (2024-02-07 22:25:58+00:00): Thanks for your attention on this matter CurlingMan13. Please do not remove any Bitcoin tags when you are unsure if the merchant is accepting Bitcoin or not. We have a large community going around verifying these merchants, so we know that our tags are correct and accurate.
cartofy (2024-01-18 10:28:41+00:00): Hello! Welcome to OSM. Please go through the OSM Wiki to understand how to make changes: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

Also, kindly avoid making fictional changes like you have done here. OSM is a database that is widely used across the world for use cases ranging from Disaster Management, to Navigation and adding fictional data benefits nobody. I have gone ahead and deleted this motorway you created, which clearly does not exist. If you need to experiment with OSM, kindly download data locally and play around in any GIS software.

Thanks!
NeisBot (2024-01-18 11:14:58+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146400513
NeisBot (2024-01-18 11:13:44+00:00): Removing testdata

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146400470
NeisBot (2024-01-18 11:14:18+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146400470
hoserab (2024-01-19 18:35:08+00:00): I've just deleted this way entirely, it's mostly standing water.
watmildon (2024-01-19 20:37:08+00:00): Totally sensible. Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2024-01-18 13:13:40+00:00): Hi there,

This changeset mangled this area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/907159637

Could you please fix this? Thanks!
Trail_Caretaker (2024-01-18 17:43:13+00:00): Thanks for catching.  I must have grabbed a node instead of the map when I wanted to move the map.  Fixed.
emersonveenstra (2024-01-19 17:45:21+00:00): Thank you!
watmildon (2024-01-18 04:03:47+00:00): Sorry about this bounding box. The dangers of "upload" button beating out my attempts to do "upload selection for each one of these. I'll dix up the waterway tags on water=pond areas in just a minute.
mcliquid (2024-01-18 07:49:33+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
DomiAr (2024-01-19 15:19:19+00:00): Hi mcliquid,
thank you very much for spotting that! 
I'm project manager from TT, Domi and l live in Poland, hence I'm always interested in local data. I will check, together with my editorial team, what went wrong in this case and improve for future. This is adding local roads related challenge we worked on, this big change set is not desired for sure and I will learn how to map better quickly. Thanks for feedback and happy weekend soon ;).
mcliquid (2024-01-19 15:48:35+00:00): Thank you for the friendly feedback! Keep your great work and happy mapping :)
DomiAr (2024-01-23 10:19:08+00:00): Hi again,
I told you that, but still, to be sure I addressed all change sets feedback:
mapper worked in POL roads challenge, then jumped to CAN to fix small error in and upload all edits in big change set. We retrained our team to be careful for limited change sets reflecting logical edits grouped and we will improve for the future. Thank you once again, feel free to contact us and me directly if you see anything, we can do better for OSM. More than happy to learn from you, regards! 
Domi
LockOnGuy (2024-01-18 11:47:11+00:00): Hi, there is no link here at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11527214256 between the road and the residential road, please remove it and be careful next time. Regards.
LockOnGuy (2024-01-18 11:50:20+00:00): I fixed it myself, as there were another mistake/error with this changeset that I had to revert too.
LopDesert1 (2024-01-22 02:36:33+00:00): Hi LockOnGuy, thank you for reaching out. After doing further investigation, recent aerial imagery indicates that this connection is not certain to exist but it is not easily decipherable. I am curious if you are local to the area and could upload any ground imagery to Mapillary (https://help.mapillary.com/hc/en-us/categories/115000239905-Contributing) or Kartaview (https://kartaview.org/landing) for this and similar intersections. It would be great to have more resources to help with accurate mapping in the city. You also mentioned that there were other errors in this changeset. I would be happy to address those if you could give me more information on them. My goal is to map as accurately as possible. 
Looking forward to hearing back from you and to improve the road modeling in this area. Thanks and Happy Mapping!
fortera_au (2024-01-18 04:43:14+00:00): Hi Chrisbee2, the name tag should only be used for real names of things. Are these also notable enough to be tagged as tourist attractions? There's nothing around them other than what looks like 4WD tracks.
emersonveenstra (2024-01-20 14:04:11+00:00): Hi there,

Thanks for the edits! On https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5667095376 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5667095377/history
and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5667095374 you changed the "crossing" tag to "traffic_signals;uncontrolled". Since those are conflicting tag values, could you please go back and edit them? Also, you created the crossing ways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1240663688 as crossing=uncontrolled, but there is a traffic light at that intersection, so i'm not sure that's right either. Thanks again! let me know if you have any questions
BikeME (2024-01-22 04:15:23+00:00): emersonveenstra,
I believe I fixed the ones you mentioned. Thanks for letting me know the issue!
map per (2024-02-01 20:40:38+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
NeisBot (2024-01-18 05:31:04+00:00): Hello Tomaslm, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
MxxCon (2024-01-19 20:14:05+00:00): Since in US there’s no official regulatory body managing hotel star ratings and each hotel can rate themselves however many stars they want, it serves no purpose other than promotional/advertisement for the hotels.
As such, stars=* should not be used in US and will be deleted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146390513
arjunaraoc (2024-01-23 01:51:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

I have reverted your changes  vide https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146574941 as most of your mapping does not conform to the satellite/aerial image and follow OSM guidelines.  Please learn more about OSM and start with small edits such as adding a place, adding a road etc.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146390685
AmanBD (2024-05-16 17:40:09+00:00): Please do not include address of a feature in the name field. Address should be included in separate field.
lyctkel (2024-01-20 19:08:07+00:00): Hi NickBeck,
I have taken the freedom to change recycling:glass_bottles into lower case, as described in the Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling
Regards and greetings from the Netherlands
leofranz (2024-01-18 13:36:22+00:00): Hi,
kannst du dir diese Änderung bitte noch einmal anschauen? Weil jetzt gibt es zwei Schulen: einmal die "Volksschule am Stiftsplatz" und einmal die "Volksschule Am Stiftsplatz Hall i.T."
Jakobw1 (2024-01-19 22:55:39+00:00): Habe die beiden Schulen zusammengeführt es gibt jetzt nur noch das Gebäude.
spiregrain (2024-01-18 08:57:34+00:00): Good morning!  In this changeset, you've added a duplicate Sleep.8 shop in Westfield.  The original is here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10293535791   and the new one is here:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11527354691

Are you happy for me to merge them, so we retain all the new information you've added?   Or feel free to merge them yourself.   If you do, please retain/add the "level= -1" tag to show what floor it's on.
spiregrain (2024-01-19 09:52:25+00:00): I've merged them, retaining all your new data.
gscholz (2024-02-23 07:20:11+00:00): Hi XioNoX,
your recent activities have left behind a lot of errors regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-4.45881&lat=48.39526&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146431445

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you plese fix this?

Due to bugs in "osm-relatify" several roundabouts are affected here. Please do not destroy roundabouts, keep them intact.

Kind regards
Guido
XioNoX (2024-02-23 07:28:59+00:00): Hi,
The change was made with the tool Relatify, bugs introduced by this tool should probably be signaled in https://github.com/Zaczero/osm-relatify/issues
And maybe the tool should be turned off if its behavior is not correct.

Not sure what you mean by "destroy" I don't think I've deleted any ?

Regardless, please let me know more precisely what the errors are and how to fix them and I can probably have a look.

Cheers
gscholz (2024-02-23 07:41:08+00:00): Hi XioNoX, 
thanks for your quick response. If you just use a reasonable editor to edit the affected roundabouts (e.g. JOSM) you will easily see what is broken. The bug itself is addressed at the developers, but fixing seems to take time. Meanwhile this kind of errors are accumulating in the map. 
Guido
XioNoX (2024-02-24 19:58:31+00:00): Thanks, I looked around JOSM but couldn't find any obvious way to fix it. The "validation result" window is empty. Any guidance is welcome.
gscholz (2024-02-25 07:00:21+00:00): Hi XioNoX,
assuming you would just use the OSM Inspector view mentioned above, lets zoom closer:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-4.46454&lat=48.43828&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

Now you can already see, there is something wrong with the three roundabouts.

Now click on one of the blue markers. A "selection" window will pop up, showing different icons to select your editor. Click on the icon with the stylized pencil. Now JOSM will open directly the affected ways.

To see an actual error message, you can select the complete roundabout area and then run the validator.

But you can also just click on a section of the roundabout with the middle mouse button to get a list, which ways are there laying on top of each other.

I f you are used to JOSM, you may know that connection points are makred slightly bigger than those nodes which are within a way. So this also gives a hint here as all connection points in the roundabout are big.
Guido
XioNoX (2024-02-25 07:23:08+00:00): Thanks ! I think I fixed some of them. The difficulty is that they both have bus relations on them, which need to move to the "final" way. Let me know if there is an easy way to do that, so far it's quite cumbersome.
gscholz (2024-02-25 07:46:11+00:00): Yes making errors is often easier than fixing those, especially if you have a tool which does it for you ;-)

I prefer to switch through the overlapping ways by selecting  those via middle mouse button and look at the route list window to find which way is used in less routes. Then I remove this way and add the routes to the other one. There is some manual work involved indeed.
Guido
gscholz (2024-02-25 07:47:21+00:00): Btw. the OSM inspector view is updated once per day at about 00:00 GMT, so you can check for remaining errors the next day.
Langlaeufer (2024-01-18 10:47:36+00:00): Ist das wirklich ganzjährig Schlamm?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146392730
Langlaeufer (2024-01-18 10:44:25+00:00): Hier stimmt was nicht: asphaltierte Wege sind immer grade1 "befestigt"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146392738
Tryer23 (2024-01-18 13:59:07+00:00): Korrekt. Ich korrigiere
Langlaeufer (2024-01-18 10:35:58+00:00): Hi, willkommen bei OSM.

Hier scheint was nicht zu stimmen. Die Straße Peiner Feld hat laut Luftbild weder beidseitig Fußwege und auch keine zwei Radwege.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146392743
Langlaeufer (2024-01-18 10:45:40+00:00): Ich sehe hier keinen Hinweis das die Fußwege auch als Radwege dienen  (dürfen).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146392743
Tryer23 (2024-01-18 14:04:13+00:00): Beim markieren sah ich nur den die Hauptstraße. Natürlich hat der Fußweg im Peiner Feld keinen Radweg.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146392743
Langlaeufer (2024-01-18 18:21:39+00:00): o.k. alles klar, das passiert mit SC leider schnell ..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146392743
miche101 (2024-02-06 16:13:00+00:00): Ich war heute vor Ort... es gibt von Lindach bis Poing keine Verbotsbeschilderung... Praktisch könnte man hier auch mit dem Auto fahren.. nur im Wald muss man 30km/h Fahren.
Road–Runner (2024-01-19 01:54:18+00:00): Hallo. Die Burg und die Kirche drunter hatten auch einen zugehörigen Wikipedia Artikel.
spiregrain (2024-01-18 09:01:51+00:00): This Sleep.8 store is a dupe, added by a new user who seems to be a Sleep.8 enthusiast.  I've messaged their changeset - 146391325
aTarom (2024-01-18 12:08:39+00:00): Hello, thanks for editing, can you help me with these tag please?
"capacity:reserve" 1 use
"capacity:reserved" is in use, is it applicable?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/632328921/history

Cheers
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2024-01-18 19:00:05+00:00): There are 5 real pitches for motorhomes. But then on Carrer de la Cerdanya there are 3 markings for larger vehicles. These are also used by motorhomes. I am not sure that these are officially for motorhomes. But there are some stopovers where you allowed to use neighbouring parking lots when the caravan_site is full. So that is kind of the opposite of reserved. I am open to suggestions for a better tag.
dopfen (2024-02-10 15:07:03+00:00): Hallo c62999x,
war in diesem Änderungssatz die Absicht, das Fußballfeld in Wetten rund zu machen oder war das ein Versehen?

Gruß
dopfen
c62999x (2024-02-13 07:04:57+00:00): Hallo dopfen, das war ein Versehen. Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe das korrigiert.


Grüß
eggie (2024-01-18 10:34:08+00:00): Dag j vsr

Je vraagt feedback... 
Kort door de bocht. Staat er een bord G7 en/of is het duidelijk alleen voor wandelaars bedoeld dat highway=footway gebruiken.

Geen bord dan highway=path gebruiken met foot=yes en bicycle=yes of no.
Bij opstaande stoepranden en toch geen bord tag ik meestal footway. 
Mapse
eggie
Kovoschiz (2024-01-18 09:02:01+00:00): Please don't delete info with obvious mistakes that can be corrected https://www.topshoulder.com.hk/contact-us.html
owennson (2024-01-18 17:26:05+00:00): 明顯是修正錯誤，美國銀行中心並不是醫院
Patrickov (2024-01-20 00:15:19+00:00): @owennson 人哋個意思係叫你唔好亂咁 delete 嘢。修正錯誤有好多方法。
Kovoschiz (2024-01-22 05:49:02+00:00): It's preferrable to not delete things even if you are working on them. Eg you deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2441045168 outside TST East BT without replacing it. Maybe you forgot, but for organizational and tracking reasons, it's not desirable. Certainly the result was deterimental there.
eggie (2024-01-18 10:30:48+00:00): Dag j_vsr
Je vraag feedback 
Correct gedaan ... Het adres is nog intact.
MVG
eggie
elsy1 (2024-01-18 10:42:35+00:00): این کار شما خرابکاری محسوب میشود و تمام ویرایش های شما برگشت خواهند خورد
osmviborg (2024-01-18 09:20:16+00:00): Genvejstast 'q'
eggie (2024-01-18 10:13:57+00:00): Dag Jim... Dit is helaas niet de manier waarop we wegen tijderlijk onrouteerbaar maken.
Dat doen we met conditionaltagging.
Voorbeeld..  access:conditional=no @ (2023 Sep 20-2024 Apr 3)
Zoek svp uit tot hoelang de afsluiting duurt.

MVG
eggie

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-18 10:28:29+00:00): Fase 1 aangepast... Evt zou je kunnen uitzoeken of de uitzondering voor OV ook geldt voor Fase 1. Dat is mij niet geheel duidelijk. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-18 10:35:47+00:00): https://www.inboekel.nl/werkzaamheden-provinciale-weg-n605-richting-uden/
philippec (2024-01-18 11:35:04+00:00): Is de aed indoor ?
Kurt PM Lapere (2024-01-18 13:25:43+00:00): neen - Kunt u me zeggen hoe u op de hoogte blijft van nieuwe aed's? Mvg.
philippec (2024-01-18 14:50:51+00:00): /*https://overpass-turbo.eu/#
Defibrillators in Flanders
AEDsSinds
*/
[out:json][timeout:25];
{{geocodeArea:vlaanderen}}->.searchArea;
( 
  node["emergency"="defibrillator"]
(newer:"2024-01-17T00:00:00Z")  
  (area.searchArea);

);
// print results
out body;
>;
out skel qt;
philippec (2024-01-18 14:51:08+00:00): En het hele verhaal =
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/defibrillators-met-foto/86237/212
frostyoa (2024-01-18 09:47:11+00:00): verifed it exists in the mina tower - ground floor
doctorapple (2024-01-18 14:33:31+00:00): کافی نت
t_ja (2024-01-22 20:24:46+00:00): Ahoj,
adresa sa prideľuje budove, preto nie je správne pridávať adresy na územia: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521939632/history
A v tomto prípade už budova (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58538221) adresu dávno má, takže máme navyše ešte aj duplicitu v OSM ;)

T.
Filip009 (2024-01-22 20:32:24+00:00): Sorry, chybyčka se vloudí. Kľudne oprav.

Pravdepodobne som si pri aktualizácií do 15 metrov nevšimol, že to aktualizuje aj toto územie.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-18 09:50:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11524832759

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Nakaner (2024-01-18 16:42:01+00:00): Hallo,

in OpenStreetMap erfassen wir Adressen nur bei Objekten, die Post empfangen können, und bei Gebäuden. Ich habe die Adresse daher wieder entfernt.

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146397257
nevw (2024-01-18 22:00:08+00:00): Hi
I think you have accidentally shifted the Crowne Plaza poi from it's proper location to a building node further north.
See in the achavi image the red dot in the bottom right has been moved to the corner of the building in green.
Can you fix this thanks
nevw (2024-01-21 09:03:18+00:00): I reverted, then fixed the spelling error
mcliquid (2024-01-18 10:22:39+00:00): Hi, müsste die Relation nicht eine Superroute sein, damit die "Kind-Elemente" richtig angezeigt werden oder bin ich auf dem Holzweg? :)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3047973
nurdafur (2024-01-18 11:24:39+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Habe ich vergessen zu setzen. Mach ich gleich.
pyrog (2024-02-20 06:40:25+00:00): Bonjour,
Quelle est ta source pour les modifications du " Bois de Vincennes PR5" ?

Pour info, le tag
name="Bois de Vincennes PR5" n'est pas approprié car la référence ne fait pas partie du nom.
Ni le tag ref. Sa référence serait ref="PR 5"

Cordialement,
Yves
Ivanerr (2024-01-21 12:42:36+00:00): Привет, хотел бы уточнить причину почему Бологое-Удомля стало tertiary?
user_3022894 (2024-01-22 21:37:48+00:00): Danke!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-18 11:00:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11527687766

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
xerlix (2024-01-18 12:35:49+00:00): Czy mógłbyś mi wyjaśnić jak to zrobić w edytorze iD?
NorthCrab (2024-01-18 13:47:04+00:00): Hej tak! Ale aktualnie jestem w drodze. Pod wieczór lub jutro rano wyślę Ci porady :-)
xerlix (2024-01-18 15:38:07+00:00): Dziękuję :)
NorthCrab (2024-01-19 08:27:00+00:00): Więc kiedy otworzysz obiekt w edytorze iD, zjedź na sam dół parametrów obiektu w menu po lewej stronie. Otwórz sekcję tagi/tags która jest domyślnie zwinięta. Tam: Usuń jedno z addr:city lub addr:street (obojętne), a drugie z nich zamień na addr:place, aby było addr:place=Galiny. I na końcu zapisz i wyślij zmiany w prawym górnym rogu:-)
xerlix (2024-01-19 09:10:20+00:00): Zmieniłem. Dziękuję za wyjaśnienie :)
qugeb (2024-01-18 10:57:41+00:00): https://api.openstreetmap.org/note/3889759
Marek-M (2024-01-18 12:34:23+00:00): Poprawka drogi rowerowej - zamiast oddzielnej drogi powinna być oznaczona dodatkowymi tagami w głównej drodze.

Poprawiłem w CS: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146403399
Marek-M (2024-01-18 12:39:25+00:00): Przejście dla pieszych z przejazdem rowerowym tagowany powinno być tagowane jako highway=path a nie jako footway - poprawiłem https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1240646475
vJack (2024-01-18 12:44:07+00:00): Właśnie mi się przypomniało, że taki myk tu zrobili
DiogoBaptista98 (2024-01-22 08:13:03+00:00): Bom dia, parece que a sua edição modificou de forma errada o nó 4358240178 da avenida dom carlos na reboleira arrastando o ponto da mesma para uma localização bastante distante distorcendo assim esta avenida, a situação foi entretanto por mim resolvida mas em próximas edições peço que tenha mais cuidado com todos os pontos para não arrastar material que não pretende editar evitando assim destruir trabalho efetuado. Boas edições
Marek-M (2024-01-18 12:10:28+00:00): W OSM numer telefonu dodajemy z prefiksem kraju (+48 w Polsce).

Czyli format, który powinno się tutaj zastosować, to:
phone=+48 797350372
lub
phone=+48-797350372

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:phone#Użycie
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146400341