piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SafwatHalaby (2026-07-03 16:47:41+00:00): I haven't heard back from you so I reverted the Adyghe name in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185051115
NeisBot (2026-04-01 17:39:22+00:00): Hi eajones, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 6 highway(s)
- 2 landuse(s)
- 7 natural(s)
- 1 waterway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180733708
woodpeck (2026-04-01 17:43:53+00:00): appears user deleted their own contributions?
ceirios (2026-04-01 19:23:48+00:00): this is strange - i'm not local but it doesn't look like the club has closed

they've got events in April and they were just awarded a grant for clubhouse upgrades

https://sport.wales/stories/energy-saving-grants-awarded-119-clubs
eajones (2026-04-01 19:38:02+00:00): No, I created this for club use but unfortunately all I have done is not appreciated so I don’t really want them to continue using my work
ceirios (2026-04-01 20:04:28+00:00): That doesn't mean that others won't appreciate your work! OSM is used by so many other people! I found it quite nicely detailed. :)
trigpoint (2026-04-01 20:04:35+00:00): Openstreetmap is used by many more people than the club so please bear this in mind before deleting. 
We are all volunteers and will never know all the uses of the data we contribute.
We appreciate your work so please don't delete any more.

Diolch Phil
trigpoint (2026-04-02 10:42:28+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/180759219
NeisBot (2026-04-01 17:39:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13699209329 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Candy store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-09 22:33:11+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181119770
(Delete spam tags. First version)
EP_Repair (2026-05-25 16:20:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
NeisBot (2026-04-01 17:45:22+00:00): Hi eajones, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 12 highway(s)
- 1 landuse(s)
- 10 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180733935
trigpoint (2026-04-02 12:05:12+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://osm.org/changeset/180759219
silversurfer83 (2026-04-01 18:34:44+00:00): Moin

private Pools bitte mit access=private erfassen und anhand mehrerer Luftbilder kontrollieren ob es dauerhafte Einrichtungen sind. Danke
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180733990
silversurfer83 (2026-04-13 19:08:33+00:00): Machst du das bitte noch?
silversurfer83 (2026-05-14 07:27:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182633247
NeisBot (2026-04-01 17:56:25+00:00): 🌍 Willkommen bei OSM, DerHydrantologe.
Danke für deine Beiträge!

Um die Zusammenarbeit zu erleichtern und anderen zu helfen, deine Änderungen zu verstehen, ist es am besten, wenn du eine kurze Beschreibung der von dir vorgenommenen Änderungen hinzufügst. Klar formulierte Kommentare helfen der Community, deiner Arbeit zu folgen und bessere Rückmeldungen zu geben. Du findest Tipps zum Schreiben guter Kommentare hier[1].

✅ Hier ist ein Beispielkommentar basierend auf deinen Kartenedits: "Feuerhydranten mit Durchmessern 100, 200 hinzugefügt"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, DerHydrantologe.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added fire hydrants with diameters 100, 200"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
Wildsharky (2026-04-03 06:23:01+00:00): Revert of 180728465
TrickyFoxy (2026-05-04 19:35:03+00:00): 👋 К сожалению Яндекс.Карты для правок использовать нельзя
flex16 (2026-04-02 08:47:10+00:00): Das verstehe ich nicht ganz. Diese Straße heißt Nonnenrod laut Kataster: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56242849
Die Ansschrift dieses Hauses ist Nonnenrod 1. Warum dann zu addr:place ändern?
Senihtu (2026-04-02 09:05:17+00:00): Der OSM-Inspector (Adressen) meldet für diese Adresse "Street not found". 
Ich dachte mir, wenn das - warum auch immer - mit dem Straßennamen nicht passt, dann passt es evtl. mit addr:place. Das sollte ja eigentlich der gleiche sein.
flex16 (2026-04-02 17:49:37+00:00): Naja vielleicht sollte man zunächst schauen, ob man einen Straßennamen eintragen kann. addr:place scheint mir sehr ungewöhnlich in Deutschland zu sein. Werde es mal hier wieder zu addr:street ändern.
Senihtu (2026-04-02 18:09:21+00:00): addr:place ist so selten nicht. 
Aber da ich annehme, daß Du näher am Ort bist, werde ich da nicht weiter diskutieren. Hoffentlich denke ich an diesen Fall, wenn ich mal wieder mit dem OSM-Inspector durch diese Gegend komme.
Happy mapping
flex16 (2026-04-02 18:33:51+00:00): Ich hatte den Straßennamen eingetragen. Du solltest jetzt keine Meldung mehr bekommen.
iandees (2026-04-01 18:09:48+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2199386014 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180735051, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
BelKed (2026-04-01 18:28:01+00:00): Ohľadom toho prístrešku a ohniska - teraz sú tam pri sebe dva body pre prístrešok - prosím opraviť

Na mieste som bol pár dní dozadu a ohnisko som tam nevidel - preto som ho ani nekreslil aj keď je viditeľné na ortofoto (možno je len zarastené?)

A ohľadom tagov pre prístrešok:
https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/vHRlnI7EnXI/m/gu7DJ7LfAQAJ
Rick Richards (2026-04-01 19:57:16+00:00): Opravené v https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180738693
Ohniskom som teda taktiež odstránil, pravdepodobne bude zarastené. Vďaka za info ohľadom tagovania.
mueschel (2026-04-05 17:30:49+00:00): Hallo,
sind das hier wirklich touristisch wertvolle Hinweise auf Schieber? Ich nehme an du meinst
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:marker
mcliquid (2026-04-05 17:38:19+00:00): Hey, danke dir. Ich hatte damals nur irgendwas mit "plate" im Kopf und JOSM hat gemeint, dann braucht es auch ein Main-Tag. Ich hab das jetzt nochmal sauber nach Wiki gemacht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180909154
Sébastien Pi (2026-04-09 18:58:18+00:00): Bonjour Thomas,
La station de recharge (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1495184621/history/1) existait déjà depuis longtemps https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12756746666/history
Je viens de fusionner. Il y a des informations contradictoires entre votre import (?) et le terrain il me semble (j’avais regardé il y a une dizaine de mois) sur le nombre de prises.
Wildsharky (2026-04-03 06:12:57+00:00): Revert of 180687158
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
YomanNH (2026-04-01 18:55:10+00:00): Dlaczego not:network:wikidata=Q1784404?

A poza tym: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Adam Haba (2026-04-01 18:57:22+00:00): Chciałem po prostu, aby te miejsca zatrzymania były widoczne
YomanNH (2026-04-01 19:07:59+00:00): W jaki sposób tag not:network:wikidata=Q1784404 na to wpłynął? I dlaczego uważasz, że te punkty nie należą do krakowskiej sieci tramwajowej?
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Carto_Graph (2026-04-03 19:52:52+00:00): У остановок есть еще stop_position (точка на дороге).
TrickyFoxy (2026-04-04 21:08:52+00:00): amenity=shelter + shelter_type=gazebo это беседки. 
Второй тег явно лишний. 

Вероятно вам нужно что-то вроде https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bunker_type%3Dbomb_shelter или https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:assembly_point:bombing
MapMagics (2026-04-01 19:18:40+00:00): Correction: Source used was Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2026-03-31, Staðfangaskrá.
misterte (2026-04-01 19:13:34+00:00): Hi,
has this mechanical edit been discussed before?

Can you point me to the discussion?

As per requirements mechanical edits need to be announced and discussed beforehand.

mt
sheldonelectric (2026-04-01 19:15:30+00:00): it's not a "mechanical" edit. I'm checking the stations one by one.
woodpeck (2026-04-01 21:15:56+00:00): sheldonelectric, please stop doing this and seek a consensus in the German forum before you continue. Your use of the "name" tag to describe the operator and location is not appreciated in Germany, and there is no consensus on mapping the "charge" (and you haven't specified a source for this information).
sheldonelectric (2026-04-01 21:42:56+00:00): There was already names in some of the charging stations before I edit them. The locations are visible from satellite images, the names prices and opening hours are in the official website. (As more in general, all providers show this info on their platform and not on the station itself).
sheldonelectric (2026-04-01 21:56:05+00:00): Also, german names are not appreciated in Greece. Why did you restore this (wrong) german name which I had deleted? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2639325489/history
BCNorwich (2026-04-02 05:17:36+00:00): Well done, but it was in Scotland in 1994. Thus I've reverted it.

Best Regards Bernard
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Baloo Uriza (2026-04-01 21:21:35+00:00): Generally a good idea to include the street names on sidewalks for the same reason we do it on all carriageways of multiple carriageway streets.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180737583
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Wildsharky (2026-04-03 06:13:51+00:00): Revert of 180695166
spiregrain (2026-04-01 21:44:47+00:00): Roach Point Bridge still not reopened, then?  *sigh*
MacLondon (2026-04-04 19:27:23+00:00): I had a look yesterday, half-expecting that it might have opened the previous day.

There's still a small gathering of railing + handrails on the ground for the steps at the southern end of the Fish Island side.

Looks like it might 1 works day away from opening.
spiregrain (2026-04-04 21:43:35+00:00): Maybe they're waiting for a VIP to come along with scissors for the ribbons, and they're all in local election 'Purdah'
MacLondon (2026-04-06 13:16:40+00:00): Possibly needs to pass a safety check first. I'd be hopeful it might get opened up as soon as tomorrow... but I might be overly optimistic.

One grumble... the placement of the 'no entry' signs at the end of Wyke Rd do officially 'block' the intended future cycle route via the footbridge.
MacLondon (2026-04-08 15:06:09+00:00): Some info on the delays at https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpreview.redd.it%2Froach-point-bridge-any-update-v0-fhwaful4hmtg1.jpeg%3Fwidth%3D1240%26format%3Dpjpg%26auto%3Dwebp%26s%3Da89ea20027da7b77ad6e8db179bf8e477257f13f

Seems it might open anytime from tomorrow (council inspection) to after the electrical works on the 14th.
spiregrain (2026-04-08 15:23:25+00:00): That's too many moving parts to assume it'll be the 14th - but one never knows!
MacLondon (2026-04-24 22:54:06+00:00): Apparently the bridge opened on Thursday... but was completely cordoned off by police this afternoon. Police say it 'hopefully' will be open again on Saturday.
spiregrain (2026-04-25 17:39:34+00:00): any idea what happened?  I might be able to get over there tomorrow and have a look.
spiregrain (2026-04-25 17:40:05+00:00): (what happened to require a police cordon, I mean)
MacLondon (2026-04-25 23:47:35+00:00): I heard someone ask the police, but they weren't giving any info about the incident.

I passed there again today and the bridge was open + was being well used. There's also a connection open between the towpath and Hepscott Rd (passing beside the north end of the bridge.)

You might also be interested in checking out Bridgewater Bridge which has also opened up.

More on these at https://bsky.app/profile/maclondon.bsky.social/post/3mkbkrvv3yk2i
spiregrain (2026-04-27 07:53:48+00:00): I didn't actually make it out there this weekend - suffering from a sore foot at the moment.  I've been watching the surprising amount of progress around Bridgewater Bridge from the Liz Line.  It looks as if the footpath between Iron Bridge and the Greenway is going to be open soon too (if is isn't already) with benches and landscaping.
spiregrain (2026-04-27 07:54:26+00:00): Oh - your bluesky post confirms this!
MacLondon (2026-04-27 15:29:44+00:00): There's still a bit to be done at the Greenway end. The riverside path is done at that end and has steps to get up to... basically nothing, for now.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Sylabowy Kot (2026-04-01 21:13:42+00:00): Wgrało mi się przypadkowo z bogatszym budynkiem przy Rogalskiego.
totera (2026-04-02 17:46:34+00:00): Scusa mircozorzo, gli stalli che hai disegnato sono 1 x 1,60 m, come fanno a essere parcheggi per disabili??
mircozorzo (2026-06-02 08:37:10+00:00): Ciao, hai ragione è un errore, un preset che dovevo modificare. Correggo, grazie!
szjozsef (2026-04-02 09:31:07+00:00): Please try tu use  a better OSM editor than rapid ... :(
mapitero (2026-04-20 14:45:13+00:00): Hi szjozsef, thank you for your message!

I know, as much as I try to fix all the warnings and do not let any duplicate nodes or unconnected ways, still some of them are sent through...

Thank you for those fix, and please be assured I'm still paying double attention when editing.

Best,
Matheus
NeisBot (2026-04-01 20:15:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13541377689 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Real estate agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-01 22:33:42+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-04 10:53:57+00:00): Reverted series of changesets adding SEO POI and blatantly promotional description=* and other malformed tags to it

https://osm.org/changeset/185084889
Znaika (2026-04-16 08:58:25+00:00): Hi, wäre es nicht sinnvoll den großen Parkplatz auszuweiten? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181400459
Znaika (2026-04-16 08:59:17+00:00): ich meinte diesen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1490319535 nicht CS
Znaika (2026-04-16 09:40:31+00:00): Ist es ein Parkplatz für Behinderte? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1495246446
rempshaener (2026-04-16 10:19:16+00:00): Hallo,

ja, die ersten Markierungen sahen danach aus, waren aber noch nicht vollständig.

Viele Grüße
LarsBG (2026-04-12 14:35:51+00:00): Hej 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12920466410

Kan jeg se at du har 
brand=ok
operator=OK
operator:wikidata=Q12329785

Ifølge https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made=charge_point

Skal de ikke med på man_made=charge_point

kun på amenity=charging_station
gungnir (2026-04-12 14:41:51+00:00): Det giver mening. Fixet :)
LarsBG (2026-04-12 14:49:34+00:00): Så er den ladestation perfekt ! 

Tak for indsats!
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
NeisBot (2026-04-01 20:36:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13696439863 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Barbershop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-09 22:33:16+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181119772
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:13:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
OSM_RogerWilco (2026-05-06 08:04:18+00:00): Hallo marlema,

da Du Änderungen in Vörden gemacht hast: Kennst Du Dich dort aus? Ich frage, weil aktuell heiß diskutiert wird, ob eine Straße beim Gewerbegebiet Vörden eher öffentliche Straße/Zufahrtsstraße oder nur ein Feldweg einzustufen ist:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59221441

Du hattest dort einen Radweg (der wahrscheinlich ein Geh- und Radwegweg ist) und eine Umlaufsperre eingetragen.

Hier findest Du die Diskussion:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/nebenstrasse-highway-unclassified-oder-feldweg-highway-track/143425/88

Vielleicht kannst Du etwas zu der Straße oder Feldweg sagen. Fahren dort Fahrzeuge oder gibt es tatsächlich nur landwirtschaftlichen Verkehr?

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
Langlaeufer (2026-05-06 15:28:29+00:00): Hallo marlema,
ich hätte da auch eine Frage zur Umlaufsperre. Wie sieht die genau aus? Du hast double eingetragen, also zwei Sperren versetzt hintereinander?
Grüße Langläufer
Langlaeufer (2026-05-06 15:29:18+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier%3Dcycle_barrier#Bauformen_von_Fahrradbarrieren
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
hendrik-17 (2026-04-01 20:41:10+00:00): source=Bing
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-02 06:37:40+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180742417
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
streckenkundler (2026-04-03 16:17:43+00:00): Guten Abend,

...irgendwas passt hier nicht... 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1495276226 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1495276227 können so nicht sein, glaube ich nicht. Schau dir das derzeit verfügbare Luftbild an... Da ist eine Brücke noch im Bau zu sehen, und mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148397713#map=18/52.388677/13.786862 aktiviert, nebst Straßen...

Was ist deine Quelle? Auch weiter im Norden, Freienbrink Nord... Im derzeitigen Luftbild nichts zu sehen, als Quelle hast du aber "Brandenburg GeoBasis-DE/LGB (2025): DOP20c" angebeben.

Was ist die Quelle?

streckenkundler
streckenkundler (2026-04-03 16:25:50+00:00): Ähnliche Geschichte...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163585919