piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mueschel (2024-03-23 09:44:35+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
I see that you added many tags like these:

edificio progettato = si
elementi identitari = /
servizi presenti = Bar
stato edificio = Buono
tipo di copertura = Piano
valore storico = no

In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please make sure that you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.

If you have questions, please feel free to ask in the forums!

PS: It looks like you're working in a group with other mappers. Please point your supervisor / group leader to our organized editing guidelines:
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
ivanbranco (2024-03-23 13:36:47+00:00): Ciao ste1603, questo e altri tuoi changeset sono stati annullati per ripristinare la situazione precedente. La motivazione é che le linee guida per gli import ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ) e quelle per le modifiche di gruppo ( https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines ) non sono state rispettate. Per favore seguite le linee guida prima di procedere con ulteriori modifiche.
eggie (2024-03-20 19:21:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Dit gaat niet helpen. Is het geen barrier=gate (hek)  dat je op een node verbonden met het pad kunt zetten incl access=private .

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-03-20 19:22:51+00:00): Je afrastering zal niets doen. Op de weg zelf kan beter ook access=private
albinrene (2024-03-20 20:41:10+00:00): gast, ik probeer gewoon een eerste keer wat toe te voegen op advies van Komoot. Voel je vrij om het aan te passen. Er staat een groot hek en er is geen doorgang. Ik heb hier verder geen tijd voor
eggie (2024-03-20 20:54:48+00:00): Dag albinrene  Ik heb het deel op het erf op access=private gezet. Het zal niet meer routeren in OSM en dus ook niet in Komoot.
MVG
eggie
SekeRob (2024-03-20 17:29:02+00:00): Escape CS: Correct comment is: landuse/cover, ways, lay refinements, destinations/directions, road details, maxspeed, smoothness, marking tags, stop spot. Cocullo train station details, platform, footway. Tunnel details, narrow, below default height.
mueschel (2024-03-23 09:44:32+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
I see that you added many tags like these:

edificio progettato = si
elementi identitari = /
servizi presenti = Bar
stato edificio = Buono
tipo di copertura = Piano
valore storico = no

In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please make sure that you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.

If you have questions, please feel free to ask in the forums!

PS: It looks like you're working in a group with other mappers. Please point your supervisor / group leader to our organized editing guidelines:
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
ivanbranco (2024-03-23 13:32:50+00:00): Ciao Flaviale, questo e altri tuoi changeset sono stati annullati per ripristinare la situazione precedente. La motivazione é che le linee guida per gli import ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ) e quelle per le modifiche di gruppo ( https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines ) non sono state rispettate. Per favore seguite le linee guida prima di procedere con ulteriori modifiche.
mavl (2024-11-13 07:58:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159079753 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
michel60 (2024-03-29 18:29:55+00:00): Bonjour,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2660622#map=19/48.78264/3.29418

Svp, ne pas scinder les roundabout(s), çà ne sert a rien sinon a compliquer les "route" :
- Plus de parties à inclure
- Et à chaque coupure, il faut vérifier l'ensemble des routes passant par ce roundabout sinon leurs continuités passent en défaut:

L'outils suivant donne les routes en défaut:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=3.25477&lat=48.78865&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.94&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid
Cordialement Michel
mueschel (2024-03-21 10:01:01+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
I see that you added many tags like these:

edificio progettato = si
elementi identitari = /
servizi presenti = Bar
stato edificio = Buono
tipo di copertura = Piano
valore storico = no

In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please make sure that you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.

If you have questions, please feel free to ask in the forums!
ivanbranco (2024-03-21 12:21:32+00:00): Ciao Martaaaaaa, qual é la fonte di queste modifiche?
ivanbranco (2024-03-23 13:04:02+00:00): Ciao Martaaaaaa, questo e altri tuoi changeset sono stati annullati per ripristinare la situazione precedente. La motivazione é che le linee guida per gli import ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ) e quelle per le modifiche di gruppo ( https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines ) non sono state rispettate. Per favore seguite le linee guida prima di procedere con ulteriori modifiche.
dadavid (2025-03-07 12:59:00+00:00): Hi Westpfeil, du hast hier eine Durchfahrthöhe von 3.5 Metern eingetragen, die wie du ja auch mappst nicht beschildert ist. Das kommt mir sehr wenig vor, da unter 4 Metern Durchfahrthöhe eigentlich ein Schild dort stehen müsste. Auch der Durchfahrthöhen-Datensatz aus den Offenen Daten Köln kennt da keine Beschränkung. 

Kannst du vielleicht nochmal vor Ort schauen und ggf mit einem Maßband oder Laser nachmessen? :) 

Viele Grüße
dadavid (2025-03-08 23:28:04+00:00): Danke fürs Anpassen :) 
Weiterhin viel Spaß beim mappen :)
mueschel (2024-03-28 09:38:39+00:00): Hi,
could you have another look at the parking tags? The current scheme doesn't have "parking:both:diagonal", but "parking:both:orientation=diagonal".
TravelingEditor (2024-03-28 20:26:28+00:00): Thanks for having a look. I've made changes to reflect your suggestion. Hopefully, that does it.
CasperGeo (2024-06-21 12:25:39+00:00): Hi Raka, nice work mapping everything. May I ask why you are working with imaginary offset? Cheers, 
Casper
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148925129
Raka Dimas Saputra (2024-06-21 23:58:54+00:00): Hi Casper,

Thank you! The reason I'm working with an imaginary offset is that when using Bing satellite imagery, the existing objects are sometimes placed inaccurately or distorted. Therefore, the map needs to be adjusted to match the actual objects.

Cheers,
Raka
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148925129
CasperGeo (2024-06-22 08:00:19+00:00): HI Raka, viewing your work on my Bing imagery all features are misplaced by the offset. Are you aware if the users of this project will be able to transform the imagery / features if I validate them as they are (with offset), or do I need to replace all features and then validate them?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148925129
Kovoschiz (2024-03-21 09:34:07+00:00): 1. `building:levels=` is counted in total vertically, so this would be `building:levels=29` + `building:min_level=4` 
2. `building:flats=` is the total number in the entire building, not per floor 
3. `access=permissive` means allowed, not by permission. This would be `=private`
ivanbranco (2024-03-23 14:19:43+00:00): Ciao Eleonora, qual é la fonte di queste modifiche? E di quale progetto fanno parte?
cpwm (2024-04-18 14:35:54+00:00): "Tires" is the correct and common spelling for all of the United States of America. I cannot speak to any of the surrounding territories, or even it's bordering countries but in the USA "tyres" is a typo.
Mannivu (2024-04-18 16:24:51+00:00): OSM prefers British English, so tyres is the correct form https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service:vehicle:tyres%3Dyes
cpwm (2024-04-18 16:44:37+00:00): I don't agree with your response. I would appreciate if you would entertain my comments as they would possible benefit all of the current US population and the countless visitors to the USA. "Tires" per the wiki is a, 'Possible tagging mistake'. Emphasis on 'possible'. You opened this thread (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposal-automatic-edit-of-tags-servicetires/106075) and you stated it was a 'typo'. Where has OSM stated that it prefers 'British English' for an entire geographical region that speaks 'American English'? I'm trying to communicate to an Italian editor as an American citizen that this is not effective. The contributors in America are *not* incorrectly tagging edits 'tires', as that is the appropriate spelling in our geographical region. "Tires" is not slang or a misspelling in the same way that "tyres" in 'British English' is not slang or a misspelling.  If an American is searching on OSM for a "Tire Shop", how will the tag "tyre" be beneficial? Tire brands, stores, service centers-all use "tire".
Mannivu (2024-04-18 17:33:45+00:00): The services of a shop should be handled by the application, not by the user. If the application is correctly written it should know that even if the user writes "tire" it should search for "tyres" tags. Moreover, I think it's very wrong to have a tag working only for a state, while the rest of the world agrees on another tag. I understand that "tire" is a possible tag, but why should this tag not follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like#How_to_name_new_tags (which also suggest that new tags should be in British English)? "Tire" is US-centric and this can lead not only to mistakes but also to some engine not looking for these places since the more widespread tag is "tyre".
cpwm (2024-04-18 17:56:17+00:00): "a state"-as in a single state?-the United States of America has 50 states and 5 territories with about 340,000,000 population. 

Nevermind.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
MikeN (2024-04-18 18:10:07+00:00): The actual spelling of tags is not important - the application needs to know that "blowout", "flat" and "tire" can suggest tire shops.  The database key value happens to be 'tyre' but that is hidden from the end consumer.   There is a significant value to the database to use a single key value worldwide.
Mannivu (2024-04-18 18:14:12+00:00): State, country, whatever. It's the USA (340 million) vs the rest of the world (6660 million).
cpwm (2024-04-18 18:50:00+00:00): It's not a USA vs. the rest of world situation... that attitude defeats the entire collaborative approach of open source. It was noted as a typo. All I'm saying is that it's not a typo for North America and Canada... if the responsibility is on the application that uses OSM data to map the Northern American spelling of 'tire' to 'tyre', than fine.
Mannivu (2024-04-18 18:54:00+00:00): I used "typo" meaning that it's a typo for OSM tags, I know that it's not a typo. Since British English is preferred in OSM, "tyre" is the preferred in OSM.
Piskvor (2024-03-20 17:35:24+00:00): V terénu je situace "cesta ještě není, most už ano" k vidění například v MÚK V Rybníčkách: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185809273

Většina mostů na highway=proposed je stejně tak proposed - pokud je tam bridge=yes, je to zbytečný šum třeba v plánování trasy podle maxheight.
BR_pebble (2024-07-18 12:17:48+00:00): Hello Kingsley AMANKWE
Thank you for mapping!
Created the missing building polygon at 8.4474749, 8.7109848 and missing highway at way 1265052923 .
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
olo81 (2024-03-20 18:58:40+00:00): jeśli jest to droga dojazdowa trzeba zmienić na service
Mariusz_Z (2024-03-20 19:36:17+00:00): Zmienione.
olo81 (2024-03-20 18:48:28+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:leisure=fishing?uselang=pl

To nie jest wiele łowisk tylko jedno łowisko. Proszę o czytanie wiki. 
Które zresztą już jest dodane. 
Proszę o rozwagę.
Mariusz_Z (2024-03-20 19:31:11+00:00): Proszę o prawidłowe oznaczenie stanowisk wędkarskich.
Mariusz_Z (2024-03-20 20:01:52+00:00): Według wiki, oznaczenie "łowisko" może być przypisane również do pojedynczego punktu.
olo81 (2024-03-20 20:15:22+00:00): To nie oznacza że można dodawać wiele łowisk. Czy każda z tych ławek które pan oznaczył jako osobne łowisko jest w rzeczywistości osobnym łowiskiem, ma nadany swój numer, nazwę? 
Nie dublujemy nazw które już są dodane. Łowisko już jest dodane wraz z numerem i nazwą. 
Ławka nie jest łowiskiem, jest po prostu ławką.
olo81 (2024-03-20 20:17:59+00:00): To czy edytor użyje pojedynczego punktu czy obszaru jak w tym wypadku to jego wybór. Oznaczenie obszaru jest po prostu dokładniejsze. Jeśli nie  znamy dokładnego obszaru dodajemy punkt.
olo81 (2024-03-21 07:16:13+00:00): Widzę że łowiska usunięte, tylko dlaczego ławki też usunięte?
Mariusz_Z (2024-03-21 09:21:43+00:00): Usunięte, ponieważ to nie są ławki. Jeśli coś nie ma możliwości opisu to lepiej tego nie zaznaczać.
olo81 (2024-03-21 16:00:56+00:00): Rozumiem że można te ławki inaczej traktować niż zwykłe ławki przy ciągu pieszym. Ale to nadal są ławki. Można zawsze dodać dodatkowe tagowanie, że brak oparcia i coś w stylu access=designated.
Frans S (2024-03-21 12:09:33+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
I noticed that you hardly square buildings. 
Didn't you install and use the building plugin ?
Install it and use it to map buildings. Very easy to map squared or round buildings.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148926685
Frans S (2024-03-21 18:14:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark about mapping highways
How to decide when a trace is a path or an unclassified highway
First, look what they connect.  Houses, settlements, villages. Then measure the width of that trace.
In iDeditor 

Shortcut : Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle  opens measurement panel
Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.
If a trace is max 2 meters wide, tag it as a path.
Wider and connect hamlets, houses and villages should be tagged as unclassified.
Tag residential in urban areas (villages, towns)
In JOSM, use the measure tab, or draw a circle (round building, shortcut Alt-Z when the building plugin is installed)) between the shoulders of a trace and read the distance on the lower toolbar. (remove the circle after that)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
This is mentioned about tracks on the
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routing#Routing_considerations

Quote: Tracks are roads of agricultural purpose. They usually connect fields to farms. The surface sometimes makes them inaccessible for regular cars, or at least limits the speeds to a very slow pace. Tracks should always be avoided for through-going traffic or within urban areas.
silversurfer83 (2024-03-21 08:12:02+00:00): Danke :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148927017
TrickyFoxy (2024-03-24 20:09:06+00:00): 👋 Уточните что вы имели в виду. Не очень понятно без описания
Dani CS (2024-05-14 20:16:27+00:00): Bonjour ! Cette relation semble donner des adresses en Route d'Amboise à des maisons qui sont Rue des Mésanges et Impasse d'Amboise, en créant des doublons au passage. Fiable ?
Frans S (2024-03-21 09:13:50+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, 
Don't follow tree lines when a building is partly hidden. Just extrapolate the roofline. Most buildings have a strict rectangular pattern. 


Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148927625
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-06 05:25:12+00:00): Hello!

Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree".

So for buildings it is not needed to put house as their name.

Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1264587597 is specifically named with such name?

And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
    
Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.
Dani CS (2024-05-14 20:14:46+00:00): Bonjour ! Cette relation attache des numéros de rue assez improbables (car très loin de la rue en question) et crée un doublon au niveau du 47 route de Vierzon. Est-ce que la source est fiable ?
Dani CS (2024-05-14 20:18:18+00:00): Bonjour ! Le numéro "64 bis" n'a pas de sens dans cette rue.
Dani CS (2024-12-29 17:10:38+00:00): Les adresses 404 et 404 bis sont assez surprenantes. Vérifié sur le terrain ?
Dani CS (2024-05-14 20:19:01+00:00): Bonjour ! Je fais mes courses ici d'habitude. Il n'y a pas de numéro "499" à cet emplacement.
olo81 (2024-03-26 09:35:39+00:00): Nie tniemy poligonów na wiele lini spiętych relacjami. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1264515944
Kolejne edycje takich tworów są bardzo trudne. Ciężko się w tym połapać. Robi się tylko bałagan. 
Już to sprzątam.
olo81 (2024-03-26 09:40:05+00:00): Chyba robi to pan przypadkowo, tnąc poligony. Trzeba tego pilnować. Już w kilku miejscach widzę cięcia.
Mariusz_Z (2024-03-26 11:08:10+00:00): Dziękuję za zwrócenie uwagi i poprawienie błędów.
Xvtn (2024-03-20 22:23:02+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your addition here. Looks great to me! For your business to show up, it needs to be added as a feature. If you haven't already, I recommend going through the tutorial for editing online. Or if you prefer, you can provide the details of your business here or in a note and I can just add it for you.
Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contributions!
eggie (2024-03-20 19:28:44+00:00): Dag Xes  Brandgangen worden tegenwoordig  vaak getagd als highway=footway  met footway=alley'
MVG
eggie
ted3sco (2024-03-24 16:30:34+00:00): Salut, pune start_date in loc de opening_date. 
Acum drumul nu mai apare pe harta ProInfrastructura.
SpinOff (2024-03-20 21:41:27+00:00): Hej. Dlaczego więc nie oznaczyłeś budynku jako zakład kamieniarski, tylko go usunąłeś? Przywróciłem go i przy okazji usunąłem tag amenity
Mariusz_Z (2024-03-21 09:25:49+00:00): Hej, słuszna uwaga, zapomniałem wrócić do tego miejsca.
olo81 (2024-03-20 19:01:54+00:00): Albo jest to park albo las, takie nakładanie obszarów się wyklucza. 
bardziej odpowiednie będzie natural=wood
Mariusz_Z (2024-03-20 19:17:34+00:00): Dziękuję za uwagę. Poprawione.
NeisBot (2024-03-24 12:40:39+00:00): Hello AkshatPal, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments \n
Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Road–Runner (2024-03-20 19:29:39+00:00): It would be very helpful if you could write changeset comments in English or the local language.
---
Bylo by velmi užitečné, kdybyste mohli psát komentáře k sadám změn v angličtině nebo v místním jazyce.
maplemoths (2024-03-20 19:10:47+00:00): Forgot to mention the source, Bing Aerial Imagery.
highflyer74 (2024-06-13 08:42:57+00:00): Hallo!

Danke für Deinen Beitrag! Bitte beachte, dass Namen in OSM nur für Objekte vergeben werden, die auch wirklich einen Namen haben. Beispielsweise hat ein Mülleimer nicht den Namen "Mülleimer". Dass es sich um einen Mülleimer handelt, ist bereits durch das entsprechende Attribut (in OSM Tag genannt) klar.

Danke, dass Du bei weiteren Bearbeitungen daran denkst :-)

Viele Grüße!
StC (2024-03-23 10:58:28+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a introduit un discontinuité dans un itinéraire du réseau pédestre du Grésivaudan. Je m'occupe de faire la réparation.
Cy R (2024-03-24 00:33:48+00:00): Looks like a pretty solid edit. Did SPR change the name of this place to "Park"? When I used to walk down here, the whole thing was called a P-Patch. The website seems to suggest that the official name is "Maple Leaf Community Garden P-Patch", but I'm curious to know what the rainbow sign says on the ground.

I think it's probably fine to tag the area surrounding the allotments as a park--just not sure about the name.
Lumikeiju (2024-03-24 00:42:54+00:00): I'm pretty sure the rainbow sign does say "Maple Leaf Community Park" and that's why I made the change, but I'll go double-check!
Lumikeiju (2024-03-24 02:02:29+00:00): The rainbow sign actually says "Maple Leaf Community Gardens" on the first row and "P-Patch" on the second. I took a bunch of photos of the area which I will upload to Mapillary soon and use to make a second pass at further micromapping the location.
mcliquid (2024-03-21 19:00:00+00:00): You are no doubt already aware of the advantages of smaller changesets. Was it not possible for you to upload the changes in smaller packages or did you simply not want to? Thanks for your answer.
VARVAR8 (2024-03-25 16:44:25+00:00): Hi mcliquid.
Here is my answer to your question:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149024785
Thanks for the reminder. Happy mapping!
Xvtn (2024-03-20 22:19:59+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. In this case, I think the service road should still be connected, even if it isn't accessible by the public. I say that because the roads do still connect. Instead of disconnecting it, I'd say we should add access tags to the gate and/or service road. Something like access=private or similar. Hopefully that makes sense. Thanks for your contributions!
Arnax (2024-03-20 23:00:55+00:00): Thanks for checking! That is basically what I was wondering.
Arnax (2024-03-20 23:10:28+00:00): How does this look? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148937384
Xvtn (2024-03-21 01:18:22+00:00): Looks great! Nice.
SpinOff (2024-03-20 21:26:36+00:00): Hej. Obecne oznaczenie nie wygląda na poprawne. Zobacz na drzewko na tej stronie: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:access#Ruch_naziemny

motor_vehicle to wszystkie pojazdy silnikowe, a motorcar to tylko samochody. Kombinacja motor_vehicle=yes, motorcar=permissive oznacza, że wszystkie pojazdy silnikowe oprócz samochodów mają tam pełny dostęp.
Mariusz_Z (2024-03-21 09:24:36+00:00): Hej, dziękuję za uwagę. Poprawię to.
emersonveenstra (2024-03-22 12:57:20+00:00): Hi there,

Do you know what the plan is for the unused part of 171st? It's probably best to put a lifecycle tag on it to avoid confusion for other mappers
infinatious (2024-03-25 04:29:15+00:00): This section of 171st is for a future northern extension of northbound lanes. It is already finished but not yet striped. I am not sure what the correct tags should be in this case.
emersonveenstra (2024-03-27 11:45:07+00:00): Probably https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction
APneunzehn74 (2024-03-21 06:29:30+00:00): Hallo, du hast hier den Namen der Straße korrigiert, danke. Gut wäre wenn die angrenzenden Pois und Gebäude die Adress Daten enthalten ebenfalls den auf den neuen aktuellen Namen geändert würden.