piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NieWnen (2024-09-06 17:02:36+00:00): Cześć,
niestety te zmiany nie są do końca poprawne.
Zwróć proszę uwagę, że został również inny tag `disused:route`, który również należy poprawić, żeby linia mogła być uznana za aktywną. 

Nie analizowałem poprawności relacji czy np. się trasy zmieniły itp.
wiktoriussz (2024-09-06 17:39:09+00:00): O jejku, dobra widzę co jest nie tak. Kompletnie przegapiłem ten znacznik. Dzięki, że mówisz. Za chwilę poprawię.
flohoff (2024-09-06 08:34:14+00:00): Moin,
sicher das das hier richtig ist?

Du hast das building tag auf dem Gebäude gelöscht und ein landuse=retail drauf gemacht. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333584807


Landuse retail wäre ja die Gesamtfläche eines oder mehrere Supermärkte - Also mit Parkplätzen etc - Und ein landuse kann nicht über/in/unter einem anderen landuse sein.

Ausserdem ist das jetzt kein Gebäude mehr.

Flo
Karl2710 (2024-10-01 18:48:50+00:00): Es ist ein Baumarkt.
Ah, building=retail ist hier richig.
flohoff (2024-10-02 07:46:11+00:00): Genau - Alles was gebäude ist ist "building=" - Wenn du sowas wie ein "Industriegebiet" oder "Wohngebiet", "Weideland" oder "Ackerland" als ganzes erfassen willst dann ist das "landuse=*"

Flo
NieWnen (2024-09-06 17:01:54+00:00): Cześć,
niestety te zmiany nie są do końca poprawne.

Proszę nie dodawaj do peronów przystankowych `public_transport=platform`. Edytor iD to bezzasadnie proponuje, ale to bardzo niechciane w tym regionie –tego nie dodajemy.

Nie zmieniaj również nazw sklepów automatycznie tak jak zrobiłeś to choćby tu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386454521
To jak najbardziej był Lux, a operatorem jest Społem. Na szyldzie jest Lux.

Dodawanie `crossing:markings=yes` bywa również dyskusyjne, nie jest to błędem, ale wydaje się być bezcelowe w przypadku większości przejść, co innego już uszczegółowione wartości.
Dimitar155 (2024-09-06 07:57:59+00:00): Някои хора ги палят умишлено, след което отнема известно време да се почисти и да се доставят нови контейнери. Предполагам че и тук е такъв казуса.
Fraxi (2024-09-06 09:24:12+00:00): Дали от изгаряне, но сериозно беше увреден единия контейнер. И другият(за стъклените отпадъци) го няма. Трябваше ли в такъв случай да го отбелязвам като промяна?
Dimitar155 (2024-09-06 10:25:36+00:00): Обикновено не ги отбелязвам, изчаквам да видя дали ще ги подменят. Така и така вече си го отбелязал, може да остане така. След 2-3 седмици може да видиш дали са ги подменили.
flohoff (2024-09-06 08:31:20+00:00): Moin,
ich habe hier den changeset gesehen. Dinge zu löschen ist oft der falsche weg. Der nächste trägt es ja wieder ein aus der Erinnerung oder Luftbild.

Bei Gebäuden ist das Eklatant weil die teilweise noch Jahre in Luftbildern und im Kataster sind. 

Extra dafür gibt es die Lifecycle prefixe - Hier wäre es richtiger gewesen da ein "disused:amenity=school" drauf zu machen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Kovoschiz (2024-09-06 09:17:01+00:00): I suggest to instead use `route=highway` for roads split into multiple sections for addressing purposes. This also matches how there are no "street" named Prince Edward Rd on its own.
Kovoschiz (2024-09-06 12:47:35+00:00): 2. You need to be especially careful with flyovers for `=street` . Many of them don't have gazetted street names. They won't have street name signs. The street name signs will appear for ground level only. I believe this is the case for Kowlooon City Roundabout. They only have `name=` for routing or common sense (which can still be doubted as there other possible names for them), or to improperly fix warnings. So they might only be included in the `=highway` .
luisfelipesv (2024-09-07 01:46:35+00:00): Thank you!
Greg91 (2024-10-13 19:06:32+00:00): Hi!
What is the basis of your update of the classification of highways is Yerevan?

I found several examples of streets, whose types are not correct (e.g. often your re-classification makes tertiary road residential)
ChromeLotus (2024-10-16 17:22:01+00:00): Hello Greg91, the highway modifications, from tertiary classification to residential, are based on a define set of characteristics that separates one from the other. There are different guidelines used to define highway classification, such as general OSM policy and RU Highways page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification#Классификация_дорог_внутри_населенных_пунктов). Some of the highways, modified into tertiary roads, were left as is. Others were modified as residential because either they were small streets and alleys with residential buildings or highways largely surrounded by houses and less significant relative to other tertiary roads (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/360172405, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/412954283, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/201715501, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117979774). Some of the highways that were previously classified as service, but are publicly accessible, were then modified to the next appropriate classification (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/189407283, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/595593128). I personally feel that these changes were appropriate on those merits, and the idea that there wasn’t any other community concerns further justified the modifications. If you have any concerns, you are welcome to raise them and we can discuss them. I hope that answers your question.
Greg91 (2024-10-16 20:00:10+00:00): First, thank you for your prompt reply! I agree with your classification for absolute majority of examples you provided in your answer.=)

So, let me highlight the trees I feel disconsent about.

I'd argue that
- Parpetsi street (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380363605)
- Koghbatsi street (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82550803
- Teryan street (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/133144300)
- Hin Yerevantsi (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/371569595)
- Spendiaryan st. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/360172405)
- +maybe other streets I not have spotted, because I did not do an exhaustive check=)
- ~maybe~ even streets like Tamanyan (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26374568)

...are tertiary along their entire length. My "feel" that these roads satisfy definition in Ru-wiki of tertiary road: "главные улицы по отношению к прочим мелким улицам/переулкам, основные микрорайонные или межмикрорайонные транзитные улицы" as well as En-wiki definition of tertiary (and less so on residential)

Those listed streets are less prominent than, say, tertiary road of Tumanyana (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/379702959), but they are still:
- serve much more for "through" traffic rather than access to neighbourhoods
- they do not have speed limits or calming measures other than their width
- very similar in role and appearance to tertiary road Pushkin street (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/133082150)

PS: my perception, is that in your edit you prefer to keep classes so that hierarchy prevails: residential should flow into tertiary, tertiary into secondary, etc. So, (in my perception) you define the Tertiary class relative to its connections; while I think that at the level of Tertiary road class hierarchy principle gives way to the functional definition.
*I have not read anywhere, if one or another approach is preferred, so I don't know)
ChromeLotus (2024-10-21 15:56:22+00:00): There might be some argument to change the classification of some roads. Teryan and Koghbatsi Street might serve more for the purposes of “through routing” and the difference between those and surrounding tertiary roads could be negligible (https://yandex.com/maps/10262/yerevan/?l=stv%2Csta&ll=44.511310%2C40.180290&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=223.024197%2C-14.750631&panorama%5Bfull%5D=true&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=44.511129%2C40.180111&panorama%5Bspan%5D=94.719955%2C60.000000&z=18). Spendiarian Street and Hin Yerevantsi Street are more localized relative to tertiary roads such as Pushkin Street, which is why those were modified that way. Parpetsi Street might serve as an artery that direct drivers to Pushkin Street, though it is hard to evaluate because of surrounding residential buildings and road width.

Having a consistent road hierarchy is sensible, though we are in agreement that function plays a role in determining classification. Ultimately, editors and communities have different interpretations for highway classification, especially when the difference is small. I hope my explanation for these individual highways is helpful in determining the most optimal decisions for your community.
bkil (2024-09-06 10:03:10+00:00): Véletlenül sikerült odébb húzni Bordány település központját. Erre kérjük a jövőben figyelni. Visszahúztam. https://osm.org/changeset/156266502#map=17/46.320795/19.922241
felipeeugenio (2024-09-06 14:28:25+00:00): Gracias. Es de acceso público esa calle? si no para agregar restricciones de acceso.
Saludos
user_14531581 (2024-09-07 12:58:33+00:00): si, es de acceso publico
RobJN (2025-03-02 11:34:06+00:00): Hi Kevin. I am looking at doing some EV charge point mapping in the UK. Can you please let me know where you sourced the ref:ocpi values from so that I can do a bit more research to properly understand this tag.

Many thanks
Rob
Archi_Ma (2024-10-10 12:19:40+00:00): Hello adi_mapcreator
I have fixed validation error - Crossing barrier/highway.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
adigis (2024-10-10 13:26:53+00:00): How do you know there is a barrier there?
Archi_Ma (2024-10-14 10:43:05+00:00): Hi  adi_mapcreator, 
I’ve connected the barrier=wall with highway=service as connectivity is somehow visible in Bing Aerial Imagery giving us hints that there is some entrance from the main highway and leading road to access the inside houses. This will also help us to avoid the JOSM Validation error i,e Crossing barrier/highway which appeared to have been generated by your edits and seems it was not not highlighted in ID Editor.

In Order to answer your question, I agree with your point and it's difficult to judge from imagery whether there is a barrier present or not but when you will analyze the data, this is the only entrance to access those north side buildings(house no-95/2) which is accessible from Soi Prasat Suk and that is the reason I didn't add any barrier tag but intersected the highway as per guidelines. I hope this answers your questions satisfactorily?

For your information I am using the JOSM Tool which is more advanced than the ID editor and you will get by default validation errors for such type of edits which we cant ignore.  Happy Mapping!
adigis (2026-07-22 05:02:51+00:00): I don't think the house fence affects TomTom navigation.
Archi_Ma (2026-07-24 15:19:38+00:00): Hi adigis,
Thanks for your input. Just to clarify, this isn't a TomTom-specific concern. The Crossing barrier/highway warning is a general validation error flagged by JOSM's built-in validation tool, and it's a legitimate topological issue worth resolving regardless of any single data consumer.
As TomTom, our aim is to improve the overall quality and usability of OSM data for the entire community, not just for our own priorities. A properly connected barrier and highway benefits every downstream user and keeps the data consistent with OSM community guidelines.
Appreciate the discussion, happy to look into it further if anything's still unclear.
SomeoneElse (2024-09-06 14:30:42+00:00): Please don't add things that no longer exist to OpenStreetMap!
OSM is a map of how things are now, not things that have been demolished.
hendrik-17 (2025-03-14 20:20:31+00:00): Moin,

du hast hier für viele Betriebsstellen das railway-tagging von railway=halt auf railway=station geändert.

Es handelt sich aber in den meisten Fällen bahnbetrieblich tatsächlich um Haltepunkte, weshalb das tagging richtig war.
Ich habe das mal korrigiert.

Beste Grüße
hendrik-17
businessesMan (2025-03-14 21:03:25+00:00): Moin,
Vielen Dank für die Korrektur. Es waren einige Stationen als "Stadtbahn-Station" getaggt, was aus dem Tag change resultiert. Das erschien mir damals wohl schlüssig, deshalb hatte das zur Vereinheitlichung auf diese Stationen angewandt. Dabei macht es natürlich auch nach Wiki so viel mehr Sinn. Ich weiß nicht mehr was ich damals dabei gedacht habe. Besten Dank bereits für deine Korrektur und Zeit, hätte ich sonst auch nachgebessert.

Schönen Abend dir noch
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 04:01:52+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164574024
une abeille (2024-09-06 13:41:28+00:00): Are these real?
Tiantian Zhou (2024-09-06 13:49:25+00:00): Yes I live over there
felipeeugenio (2024-09-06 14:27:21+00:00): Hola. Buenas ediciones.
una observación. Si los edificios están pegados, entonces se tienen que dejar pegados, pero deja unos pasillos entre ellos que, si bien pueden ser, tengo la sospecha de que no son así. Solo un comentario.

Saludos
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 04:10:12+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165052779
mcliquid (2024-09-06 07:46:34+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Hadi Omid (2024-09-06 09:52:07+00:00): سلام.
ویرایش شما باعث مشکل در مسیرها شده بود و الان اصلاح شد.
لطفا در زمان ویرایش، دقت کنید.
ممنون
Kovoschiz (2024-09-06 09:14:07+00:00): `=street` should be used for all road names, especially in Hong Kong. There are in fact no "road names" in HK, only street names. These "Highway" use the same street name signs.  They can have address assigned, ie 668 Tsing Sha Hwy for the Administration Building, and 7 Lion Rock Tunnel Rd.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-12 20:50:42+00:00): disconnected roads
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156254512
Kovoschiz (2024-09-06 09:42:41+00:00): I would like to mention using `route=highway` for this would be perfect for the purposes in HK. I believe there are actually no "street name" for it. Only the tunnel structure is named for itself, and for Tunnel Area according to the Road Tunnels (Government) Ordinance. Government records seem to have a mistake, or procedure problem.
NeisBot (2024-09-06 03:48:38+00:00): Hi Athallah Naufal Hadi, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 85% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 highway(s)
- 81 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=156254715
Athallah Naufal Hadi (2024-09-06 03:54:41+00:00): Yes those were intentional
cuzi (2025-07-19 23:23:13+00:00): Hi, could you please comment on the following note regarding the Parie Lakes golf course: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4857164
YomanNH (2024-09-25 10:25:14+00:00): Pamiętasz może co dokładnie dzieje się na drodze https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177924949 ? Dodałeś tag construction=yes, który według wiki jest przestarzały. Nawigacja omija mi ten fragment, zapewne błędnie. Chciałbym to poprawić, ale nie mam pewności jak.
VA00 (2024-09-25 16:29:19+00:00): Koło kapliczki był zerwany asfalt, chyba robili jakiś chodnik/schody. Może już skończyli. A nawigacja i tak powinna omijać tą drogę, jest niewiarygodnie dziurawa. Chyba, że MTB. Do nowych tagów będę musiał się dostosować, ale na razie ich opis jest bardzo mętny, nawet nie wiem jaki byłby adekwatny: construction:highway=yes ?
YomanNH (2024-09-25 18:18:52+00:00): Jak jest remont, ale jest możliwy przejazd, choćby dla mieszkańców, to używam construction=minor. Z wiki: "construction=minor może być użyty dla istniejących dróg, które są modyfikowane lub naprawiane bez ich zamykania. W tym przypadku nie stosujemy highway=construction, lecz zostawiamy to jako jej domyślną wartość."

Jak droga jest dziurawa, to wystarczy to oznaczyć używając tagu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:smoothness. Ja chętnie przejadę dziurawą drogą, zamiast robić objazdy po drogach polnych (pewnie równie dziurawych) czy drogach głównych z dużym ruchem. Z tego co widzę, ten tag już jest.

Zmieniłem tag na construction=minor. Dzięki za info!
VA00 (2024-09-25 18:53:25+00:00): Był zerwany asfalt, ale zakazu ruchu faktycznie sobie nie przypominam. Ja bym się jednak nie spieszył z otwieraniem bez sprawdzenia https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1313838273 Remont jest zaplanowany na rok: https://skawinska.pl/przebuduja-547-metrow-drogi/
YomanNH (2024-09-25 19:57:17+00:00): Tak, widziałem budowę chodnika. Ale budowa chodnika to nie jest coś, co sprawi, że przecznica na długości 300 metrów będzie nieprzejezdna. Może naprawią kawałek drogi koło skrzyżowania, ale sam napisałeś, że nie było zakazów, więc obecne tagowanie lepiej oddaje stan rzeczywisty.
CurlingMan13 (2025-02-05 04:00:56+00:00): Changeset reverted.  These are residential roads, not living streets.  Living streets are very rare in the US.
See:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street#United_States

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162149410
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 04:10:13+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165052779
Tomas Straupis (2024-09-06 08:13:30+00:00): Negerai. Yra autobusų stotis, o yra stotelė „Autobusų stotis“. O po šio pakeitimo dabar gaunasi, kad stotelės nebėra, o yra DVI autobusų stotys.
eggie (2024-09-06 08:35:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Tip:  Iets is een fietspad als er een bord fietspad staat. bicycle=yes en foot=yes hoeft niet op een fietspad. het is default.
Het fietspad loopt nog wel door een sloot. Wellicht deels een waterway=drain tunnel=culvert layer-1 geworden 
of een bruggetjes? 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Maarten van Ingen (2024-09-06 08:50:53+00:00): Hoi,

Bedankt voor het reageren, ik had inderdaad bicycle=yes en foot=yes gezet en later fietspad. Dat is een onbekendheid aan mijn kant van het systeem. Qua sloot, het lastige van deze wijk is dat delen compleet nieuw zijn en er regelmatig wat zaken wijzigen. Veel tijdelijke paden, gedempte sloten, afsluitingen, etc. Daar is ook niet altijd nu al te zeggen wat het uiteindelijk gaat worden. Zoals de sloot is nu deels gedempt, mijn vermoeden is dat deze weer uitgegraven wordt zodra ze verder gaan. Vandaar dat ik de "negeer" heb aangeklikt.
eggie (2024-09-06 09:10:29+00:00): Oke.. Het vast wel wat.

Mapse
eggie (2024-09-06 09:19:21+00:00): Typo.. Het wordt vast wel wat.
Screenen is uiteraard om te helpen.

Mvg en mapse..
eggie
eggie (2024-09-06 09:42:31+00:00): Wellicht heb je wat aan de foto van 31 aug
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.36762,5.287707,18/?datastrip=20240831_PNEO-04
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 02:10:33+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164877285
infeeeee (2024-09-06 10:46:25+00:00): Szia! 

Az egyik helyén nyílt a másik? Ha igen, akkor inkább a régi pontot módosítsd, mert akkor megmaradna a bolt története, kereshető mi helyén mi nyílt. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
Bálint (2024-09-06 11:41:26+00:00): Szia! Nem vagyok benne biztos. Azt tudom, hogy a régi már nem létezik, az új viszont igen. Hogy azonos-e az üzlethelység, arról nincs infóm.
Nathan_A_RF (2024-09-08 17:53:23+00:00): Hi, the tag "maxspeed:type=GB:zone30' is not valid. For a lit 30mph road, the tag "maxspeed:type=GB:nsl_restricted" should be used. For an unlit 30mph road, the tag "maxspeed:type=sign" should be used. If there is no "lit" tag, then no "maxspeed:type" tag should be applied.
AlmostSurelyRob (2024-09-08 18:36:48+00:00): Hi, Nathan_A_RF,
Thanks for this. I confess I am a bit confused. The entire East Boldre is inside New Forest National Park which is 40 miles an hour zone. There's a zone sign in front of the village with 30mph limit and the Main Road has 30mph road sign repeated throughout. Most of these side roads are not lit, though Chapel Lane is an exception. So I guess it should be all lit streets should 
"nsl_restricted" are non-lit should it be "sign"?
Nathan_A_RF (2024-09-08 20:08:50+00:00): A 30mph zone is NOT the same as a 30mph speed limit, despite the terms used interchangeably in common speak in the UK. Yes, many roads in the New Forest are part of a 40mph zone (maxspeed:type=GB:zone40), however many roads around the waterside and Totton have a 40mph speed limit (maxspeed:type=sign). There is no such '30 zone' in the UK, with 30mph roads either applied using repeater signs (maxspeed:type=sign) or street lights (maxspeed:type=GB:nsl_restricted). The "lit" tags should be applied to roads before either of these tags are applied to a road with a 30mph speed limit.
AlmostSurelyRob (2024-09-09 09:34:13+00:00): Thanks for clarifying. I think I was trying to answer too literally using StreetComplete, but what you're saying is very clear now. I was also additionally confused by the fact that the lights were spread out quite irregularly so I wasn't sure. I found the OSM wiki pages that describe the convention, so I will correct those entries.
Nathan_A_RF (2024-09-09 10:10:19+00:00): Yeah the spacing of street lights does matter, however if there are no repeater signs and the road is lit in some way it's probably appropriate to use "maxspeed:type=GB:nsl_restricted" rather than measure the exact distance between lights!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 06:44:07+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164576198
ManuelB701 (2024-09-06 07:57:39+00:00): For the next time, make sure you keep changes in a smaller box as doing will make it easier to review individual changeset alongside avoiding hitting a lot of unrelated countries (in that case, changes in things in Germany shouldn't affect things in Japan and makes it appear there are changes from Italy to Turkmenistan to China).

More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
O-L-E (2024-09-27 22:01:10+00:00): sorry for the big box, i forgot I still had some edits in Japan unsaved.
TheSwavu (2024-09-08 07:41:01+00:00): Hi,

Was there a reason why you deleted the connecting roads: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1199763142 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/252601069 ?
They are still on the aerial imagery.

Thanks.
bruceas (2024-09-09 00:48:03+00:00): Hello TheSwavu
Good pick up! I can't provide a reason - I guess it was a whoops! I remember viewing the street and noting the various connections between the highway and the service roads - but still can't explain my error. (Duuh!) 
I have just reinstated the connections with their Turn Restrictions (due to the centre median).
And ... added the nearby Unmarked Crossing and Speed Bump on service rd.
Thanks again. 
Cheers
aceman444 (2024-09-29 22:46:59+00:00): Zdravim, ale toto je uplne zle. Ake "presne adresy a nazvy" akoze pridavate? Duplicitne orientacne cisla? Adresy bez mesta? Premenovany spravny nazov ulice "Antona Durvaya" na Kopcianska? Kedze ako jediny zdroj uvadzate "basemap.at", kde adresy nemozete vidiet, aky je skutocny zdroj?
mavl (2024-09-06 13:20:34+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет название школы на забор. Пожалуй, это лишнее.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537070888/history  
  
Название школы есть на линии с тегом amenity=school:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1313677708
user_20909876 (2024-09-06 14:48:52+00:00): Благодарю, случайно задублировалось из amenity=school.

Исправлено https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156278967