piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aixbrick (2024-05-17 14:06:53+00:00): Danke :-)
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 11:23:44+00:00): Thanks for your contribution in adding and modifing building mapping. The mapping looks nice and clear understanding of changeset comments. Keep Contributing, Cheers!!!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151444736
Carto'Cité (2024-05-28 15:55:52+00:00): Bonjour Benoît.

Plutôt que supprimer les voies et cheminements piétons de la place de la Concorde, je pense qu'il aurait mieux valu ajouter le préfixe disused: aux clefs highway (disused:highway=primary par exemple). Cela permet à la fois de faciliter le rétablissement de ces données (et tous leurs tags) une fois les JOP terminés, de conserver l'historique avec les versions des données, et de ne pas ca
Carto'Cité (2024-05-28 15:57:39+00:00): ... casser les relations qui utilisent ces éléments. 

J'ai tenté un revert mais le changeset ayant 11 jours c'est un peu complexe, et j'ai ouvert un sujet sur le forum OSM : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/la-place-de-la-concorde-a-disparu/24083

Il s'agit de restaurer les éléments supprimés tout en conservant les modifications réalisées depuis, ce n'est pas simple.

Cordialement, Antoine.
Benoît C MdP (2024-05-28 15:58:52+00:00): Bonjour

Effectivement, c'est ce que j'ai fait pour les autres sites (après coup). Sur Concorde, c'est heureusement un peu différent car on ne sait pas encore dans quelle configuration la place sera rétablie après les JOP

Benoît
Benoît C MdP (2024-05-28 16:01:21+00:00): J'aurai les plans de la configuration post JOP donc je pourrai remettre les choses en place.
Le revert n'a pas grand intérêt de mon point de vue par rapport à la complexité qu'il apporte.

En pratique (dans les faits), toutes les relations qui utilisaient ces éléments sont cassées.
cquest (2024-05-28 17:00:05+00:00): Si la place ne retrouvera pas sa configuration précédente, c'est effectivement moins gênant.
Karthoo (2024-05-17 16:35:39+00:00): Genau richtig 👍
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-17 09:49:33+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 151423149, 151425221.
NeisBot (2024-05-17 09:55:03+00:00): Hi Carbonero88, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1283889284

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-21 17:09:00+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151512110
MxxCon (2024-05-20 05:19:50+00:00): Hello.
But this store's name is "Key Food Fresh & Natural"...Not just "Key Food". It's a different branding from regular Key Food supermarkets.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151445181
eggie (2024-05-17 11:19:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
mcliquid (2024-05-17 10:33:56+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
NeisBot (2024-05-17 10:15:04+00:00): Hi Carbonero88, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1283894954

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
miluethi (2024-05-17 21:45:44+00:00): Hi tegamike,

Please square out your buildings. Just press the "Q" key with an activated building frame. That's it ;-)

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
Andrew Chadwick (2024-05-17 10:45:26+00:00): See also:

https://bustimes.org/services/14-oxford-city-centre-john-radcliffe-hospital#map

https://www.oxfordbus.co.uk/services/SCOX/14
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2024-05-20 12:01:56+00:00): Nevím přesně tu situaci se silnicí z Prahy do Říčan, před nějakou dobou jsem ji taky "povýšil" (i když se tak jeví jako rovná) a Milancer to dal zpátky, že nelze jen tak "pro jistotu" to udělat jako silnici 1. třídy. Možná že až se postaví úsek Pražského okruhu dálnice D0 v úseku Běchovice - D1, tak by se to mohlo udělat od MÚK Říčany (snad si ŘSD převezme ten dvoukilometrový úsek z D0 do Říčan), tak by se to mohlo čistě esteticky udělat takto. Ale zatím bych to nechal.
Vojtěch Kadeřábek (2024-05-20 22:19:10+00:00): Já bych bral, že silnice 1. třídy se najednou nezmění zničehonic na silnici 2. třídy, ne? Vím, že na tomto zdroji https://cs.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=M%C3%ADstn%C3%AD_komunikace_do%C4%8Dasn%C4%9B_pln%C3%ADc%C3%AD_funkci_silnice je silnice teoreticky označená jako 2. třída, ale pokud bychom to brali takto striktně, tak třeba Jižní spojka a Štěrboholská spojka by měly být označeny pouze jako silnice 1. třídy, Spořilovská je dokonce 2. třídy apod.
Frans S (2024-07-01 12:31:38+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A bit late, But during validating this task, I noticed that you did not tag the traces you mapped.
I corrected them.
Best regards
skyper (2024-05-17 13:26:07+00:00): Hi Swihail,
it would be nice if you'd mention the CS id you revert in the CS tags (for example in `source=*`.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150437189
Thanks, skyper
Swihail (2024-05-23 13:09:51+00:00): Thanks Skyper, i have reverted my edits and CS id for this reversion is

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151573176
Metzor (2024-05-17 12:44:49+00:00): Hi trimarin,

You can upload your changes separately in Osmand.
Please use this feature to avoid huge bounding boxes as in this changeset. 

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Metzor
trimarin (2024-10-13 22:15:49+00:00): I will try to upload more often. The problem is OsmAnd do not show the location or even time, when POI was added (without clicking it), so it's difficult to separate them.
Metzor (2024-10-14 04:22:17+00:00): Thanks!
L'imaginaire (2024-05-17 18:53:01+00:00): Dag Kenzo, uit nieuwsgierigheid: met welke toepassing bouw je de route? En wat is het begin en eindpunt?
KenzoT-Rex (2024-05-18 07:59:53+00:00): My Route App, Steentijdstraat naar Charleroi.
Die moet niet de beste / snelste route nemen, het is een aangepaste route
felipeeugenio (2024-05-17 12:21:50+00:00): Hola Diego. De todas las ediciones que te he revisado, en todas agregaste algo que ya estaba
felipeeugenio (2024-05-17 12:22:45+00:00): Además "Camino A La Serena Sin Número, Ruta D-43 Sector De Tuqui" no es un formato aceptable en OSM.
sin numero es un tag nohousenumber=yes
y la dirección tiene que coincidir con la calle de afuera.
VLD549 (2024-05-22 14:57:01+00:00): Hi, isn't the name supposed to be Pastoriestraat? 'Dit stuk verharding hoort bij de...' shouldn't be part of the name I presume?
(I'm trying to verify the name change from Visserij to Dit stuk verharding hoort bij de Pastoriestraat)

Thank you in advance!
MaartenEngels (2024-05-23 14:53:39+00:00): The name of segment 71599180 is "Pastoriestraat". Segment 768482065 has no street name.
VLD549 (2024-05-24 08:10:53+00:00): Thank you.
mcliquid (2024-05-17 13:15:49+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
rain69 (2024-05-18 12:55:02+00:00): Sorry, I forgot to save before going to another editing area
dadavid (2024-08-12 08:52:06+00:00): Hi, danke für deine Bearbeitungen :) ich habe den old_name bei dem Zahnarzt hier [1] mal korrigiert, schau gern nochmal drüber, obs für dich so passt :) 

Grüße
David 

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/817171683
HellMap (2024-05-17 14:13:37+00:00): Hello,

I changed `draugiem` back to `contact:draugiem` for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8318370892 . I don't see this mentioned anywhere in import description, so I am assuming an error.
monhiko (2024-05-18 14:17:05+00:00): 小小一个村真的有自己的古城门吗（悲）
另外，荒野好像是像类似澳洲西部那种，小区里面的绿地建议还是用草地/灌木丛吧（捂脸）
audiovisual (2024-05-17 12:23:30+00:00): dwcf
GerdP (2024-06-30 06:47:31+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Du hast hier einen "gemeinsamen Geh+Radweg" eingezeichnet. 
Auf meinen Fotos an der Kreuzung Nordermoorer Hellmer https://www.osm.org/node/4809191577
sehe ich aber Schilder "DE:239,1022-10", also "Gehweg + Radfahrer frei". Ich kenne aber nur diese Kreuzung. Wenn das durchgehend so beschildert ist, dann sollten diese Tags verwendet werden:
bicycle=yes
highway=footway
foot=designated
traffic_sign=DE:239,1022-10
Auf älteren Fotos von dieser Stelle https://www.osm.org/node/830641242 sehe ich auch ein 
"Gehweg + Radfahrer frei".
Die Strecke dazwischen kenn ich nicht, aber vermutlich ist alles gleich beschildert.
_zalle_ (2024-07-02 08:14:09+00:00): Moin Gerd!
Eingezeichnet habe ich den Weg nicht, aber angefasst im Zuge der Ergänzung von Entwässerungsgräben, Baumreihen und Feldzufahrten.
Durch Moorriem komme ich mindestens einmal die Woche und der Weg war garantiert früher als geteilter Geh- und Radweg beschildert, derjenige, der den Weg eingetragen hat, lag also schon richtig. Wann die Beschilderung geändert wurde, weiß ich nicht. Gott sei Dank kommen in letzter Zeit ja immer mehr Kommunen auf den Trichter, die Fahrradinfrastruktur angemessen auszuschildern. Ich habe die Tags nun angepasst. Von Kortendorf bis Neuenbrok ist der Weg als Fußweg/Fahrrad frei beschildert, geteilter Geh- und Radweg ist nur noch das letzte Stück bis zur B212.
GerdP (2024-07-02 08:23:31+00:00): Prima, danke Dir.
Gehwege mit Radfahrer frei sind aus meiner Sicht eher kein Teil der Fahrradinfrastruktur, aber das sehen die Kommunen wohl total anders. Als Radler darf man da ja nur Schrittgeschwindigkeit fahren, aber man kann ja auch auf die Fahrbahn. Na ja, hält sich eh kaum einer an die Regeln ;)
eggie (2024-05-17 14:10:58+00:00): Lijkt me oke.. Zie wel fouten, maar die zaten er al wellicht in.
Wijzig niet te veel in één changeset.
Wijzig geen adresnodes. 
Verwijder niet de BAG data.

Dat is allemaal import vanuit het Kadaster en wordt regelmatig geupdated. Nr 38a komt ergens 2x voor?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-17 14:13:44+00:00): nr 38a heb je ergens een weiland ingesleept en vervolgens zelf weer een nieuw adres aangemaakt.
eggie (2024-05-17 14:13:59+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151452254
eggie (2024-05-17 14:17:33+00:00): Ik heb een paar mp's hersteld. Daar stond de landuse 2x in OSM ,, Op het vlak en op de relatie.
De Gouwe klopt in ieder geval nu.
drapspartan (2024-05-17 14:20:48+00:00): Wat ik voornamelijk wilde wijzigen waren de inconsistenties en scheven wegen. Het adres node had ik inderdaad per ongeluk dacht ik 2 keer verwijderd maar wist eigenlijk niet hoe ik dat terug kon zetten. Hopelijk staat alles nu goed!
eggie (2024-05-17 14:27:25+00:00): Het is weer eenduidig.
De landuse is een beetje ingewikkeld hier. Die bestaat gedeeltelijk uit multipolygonen.
Dan hoort de landuse=grass op de relatie..  Dat heb ik aangepast. Foutjes van voorgaande mappers.
Die adresnodes heb je per abuis verplaatst. Dat komt omdat je met de kaart schuift in editmodus. Beter niet doen met editor iD.  Dan selecteer je met de linkermuis en vervolgens schuif je met die muis. Dangaat even de kaart opeens niet mee, maar wel dus die adresnode die je al had geselecteerd.
Denk dat je addr:housenumber	54 gewoon had verwijderd en niet verdubbled. ..  Die heb ik hersteld.
felipeeugenio (2024-05-17 13:05:58+00:00): Hola. por favor no agreguen duplicados.
cquest (2024-05-28 16:02:56+00:00): Suppression pure et simple de l'existant ?

Comment la voirie va revenir après les JO ? Vous vous en chargerez ?

Il aurait été préférable de modifier les tags plutôt que de supprimer les objets.
Benoît C MdP (2024-05-28 16:05:14+00:00): Bonjour Christian

Oui, c'est dans cet échange. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151444908
Bienson (2024-05-18 02:21:12+00:00): Duplikat wieder gelöscht - bereits eingetragen:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/415553662
Warin61 (2024-05-18 00:19:26+00:00): Hi,
The track at central is tagged 'construction' ... as such scheduled trains cannot run on it.
❤️‍🔥 (2024-05-18 01:55:24+00:00): sorry, I didn't realise the validator was that strict... I've moved it to a different platform for now, will revert in a few weeks when the track opens
mcliquid (2024-05-17 13:22:22+00:00): Hallo, befindet sich der Defi hier wirklich mitten auf der Wiese?
Bärger (2024-05-17 13:29:23+00:00): Nein, dort wurde letztes Jahr alles neu gebaut. Dort ist ein öffentlicher Platz mit kleiner Toilettenanlage.. der Situationsplan ist noch nicht aktualisiert.. lg
dypa (2024-05-17 16:57:07+00:00): Здравствуйте, для чего вы убрали организации? Они вполне существуют.
YomanNH (2024-05-18 11:19:16+00:00): Cześć,
ciągi pieszo-rowerowe to highway=path, a nie highway=footway. Poprawiłem.
Ewrt1 (2024-05-17 13:16:50+00:00): *and added new road
Eduard Rene (2024-07-10 07:49:34+00:00): Kindly remove this building. There is no building in this area
TrickyFoxy (2024-05-24 08:29:53+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151756765
cybermapper (2025-01-28 15:11:40+00:00): no private apartment names are allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161861487
NeisBot (2024-05-17 13:40:03+00:00): Hi Billy Racette, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1284118714

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-19 08:05:01+00:00): Bonjour Billy,

Certaines des zones de plage que vous ajoutez ne semblent pas être des plages. Celui-ci par exemple semble être une cale de halage.

Hello Billy,

Some of the beach areas you are adding don't appear to be beaches. This one for example appears to be a slipway.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-21 17:12:49+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151639114
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-25 09:11:15+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11913296263/history has shop = vending_machine that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=vending_machine ? Is it a vending machine? Or is it shop selling vending machines?
L'innominato (2025-03-25 15:38:46+00:00): Hi! It is a covered vending machine (inside the building)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-25 18:21:21+00:00): then I fixed tagging a bit  

and what is sold there?
L'innominato (2025-03-25 19:10:09+00:00): Oh thank you. It sells snaks and drinks (cocacola, pepsi, thé etc...)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-03 03:58:52+00:00): edited a bit again to specify what is vended
jak_hor96 (2024-05-19 15:00:14+00:00): Zdravim, z akeho dôvodu bol odstraneny nazov tohoto chodnika(teda ponechana len znacka loc_name)? Kedze mojim umyslom pomenovania bolo zatraktivnit tento lokalny chodnik pre turistov, ktory budu prechadzat Sklab. dolinou a mohli by to vyuzit ako skratku, pripadne sa stavit na vyhliadke na Ciernom blate.
Patr1k_P (2024-05-19 17:33:19+00:00): citali ste co sa pise na wiki? nazov nebol odstraneny len bola zmenena znacka tak ako sa pise na wiki, pisal som vam to tu

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150791881
IreuN (2025-10-18 00:50:26+00:00): 5 tysięcy węzłów? Weź że to uprość..
Filip009 (2024-05-18 17:42:14+00:00): Dobrý deň, táto mapa má zodpovedať realite. Pokiaľ sú na mieste vychodené chodníky, tak by mali byť aj v mape. Pokiaľ sú v chránenej oblasti je im správne pridaný zákaz vstupu. Tým pádom navigácie tadiaľ nenavigujú. Pokiaľ sa na vašej obľubenej mape cesta zobrazuje a nechcete aby tam bola, obráťte sa prosím na konkrétneho poskytovateľa mapových podkladov. Na OpenStreetMap sú tieto chodníky jasne odlíšené bledou farbou.
user_2322809 (2024-05-18 19:44:29+00:00): source?
traveleditor (2024-05-18 19:51:47+00:00): IDF website
zstadler (2024-06-02 17:35:05+00:00): woodpeck wrote :
"we don't map day-to-day changes in an ongoing conflict. Any alterations to borders or installation of military zones etc. should wait until the war is over."
[discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150279661]

Therefore, the mapping of the humanitarian zone declared by the IDF 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1284129831
should also be removed from OSM, as was the IDF-declared DMZ/perimeter .
discussed in the other changeset.
zstadler (2024-06-02 17:42:34+00:00): @woodpeck,
In the discussion on changeset 150279661 you wrote:
"we don't map day-to-day changes in an ongoing conflict. Any alterations to borders or installation of military zones etc. should wait until the war is over." as the reason for removing the IDF-declared military zones.

Therefore, the Al-Mawasi humanitarian zone, declared by the same IDF, should also be removed from the map.
woodpeck (2024-06-03 14:16:41+00:00): I suggest to raise the matter in a public discussion on the OSM forum. It is likely that you are right (and any "Zones" of any sort in Gaza declared by IDF should be removed) but it cannot hurt to bring this to the attention of whoever has created "#hotosm-project-16446", otherwise it might turn out to be a fight against windmills.
Frans S (2024-05-20 09:09:57+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
These changesets are reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
This is a HIghway mapping project. No need to map buildings.
But !! your building mappings are very weird and sloppy. 
Check your mapping skills. Use the Building tool when you map buildings.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151456718
Frans S (2024-05-20 09:25:55+00:00): Additional advice.
Use the Esri World imagery after aligning it with the Bing imagery and GPS tracks.
Offset 6.34;0.38 is in my opinion as close as you can get.
Hide all buildings with the filter tool. Now you have a clear view on the highways.
Keep in mind that here are many high rise buildings which need to be mapped on a specific manner. 
See this Youtube video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wdosTPbdm4
After mapping highways, you need to adjust the buildings which crosses the highways you mapped.
Best to do that is running the validation tool and select the line where the building crosses the highway is listed.
Use the to-do list to go through the errors and move the buildings away from the highway.
Since it is a highway only project, just focus on these issues.

Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151456718
Kairagi (2024-05-17 14:27:18+00:00): Real.....
mga_geo (2024-05-24 06:07:55+00:00): Bonjour,
Le trajet des relations r6299222 et r6299541 n'est plus continu.
Pouvez-vous corrigez?
Marc
mga_geo (2024-06-06 06:08:05+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous lisez vos messages ?
Marc
danieldegroot2 (2024-05-17 17:44:51+00:00): Hey Victor,

I would kindly suggest to not remove objects mapped as areas instead of nodes without proper reason(, or alternatively discussing with the original mapper).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_objects_that_you_don't_need_or_like

Objects which can be mapped more detailed, i.e. individual trees instead of tree line -not trees instead of forest if more than five or so, of course- or playground equipment/area as area instead of node should be left as nodes or areas respectively.

On the wiki it is currently explicitly okay to map as either node or area. Though, it is a guideline, not a rule.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dstreet_cabinet

If e.g. a street cabinet mapped as area does not render on your map of preference, please submit a request with the developers of the map style. Regardless, it can still easily be found using query applications. OSM is a database. not only a map.

For such cases, it is recommended to start a discussion with the community about mapping street cabinets as nodes and/or areas to reach a consensus. You can do so at
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:man_made%3Dstreet_cabinet
- https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/general/38/none
(the forum is usually faster to reply.)

Regards,

Daniel
VictorIE (2024-05-17 18:48:01+00:00): It's a transformer. Transformers are mapped as nodes.

Street cabinet fanboys calling transformers "street cabinet" is poor practice.

So, not my monkey, not my problem.
danieldegroot2 (2024-05-18 00:07:17+00:00): That seems to be true as far as the wiki is concerned. Thanks for clarifying.
mcliquid (2024-05-17 15:21:19+00:00): Does it really need its own name:mk here? There are no other translations at all.
MACEDONICUS (2024-05-22 12:31:40+00:00): Then there is no need for such relation.
mcliquid (2024-05-22 14:35:16+00:00): So can your change be removed?
MACEDONICUS (2024-05-25 11:09:13+00:00): also this relation.
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-05-26 17:55:23+00:00): Hallo Runner91a,

Stellplätze innerhalb eines Camping-Platzes werden nicht als tourism=caravan_site gemappt. Dies ist für eigenständige Wohnmobilstellplätze vorgesehen.

Um die einzelnen Stellflächen innerhalb eines Campingplatzes oder Wohnmobilstellplatzes zu erfassen gibt es den Tag tourism=camp_pitch:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_pitch

Korrigierst Du das?

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-05-26 18:07:02+00:00): Uih, hier ist leider noch viel mehr nicht richtig. Du hast z.B. ganze Flächen als einen einzelnen festen Wohnwagen (ein Gebäude) geändert. :-o

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1284141624

Am Besten ist, wenn Du Dich erstmal im OSM Wiki einliest, ob die gewählten Tags überhaupt dem entsprechen, was Du erfassen möchtest.

Der Online Editor verlinkt zu jedem Tag auch auf die richtige Wiki-Seite.
pierre_geovelo (2025-11-18 15:12:28+00:00): Bonjour, savez-vous si la piste cyclable  en construction, qui passe entre le quartier et l'autoroute, est terminée depuis ? Cordialement, Pierre
Marc Mongenet (2025-11-18 19:45:28+00:00): Je ne sais pas.
Cordialement, Marc