piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisAgent (2026-04-07 22:33:45+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 01:49:40+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and explicit source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184205245

https://osm.org/changeset/184205245
Frank Peng (2026-04-07 20:31:18+00:00): Hello BeaconOSM, I see that you deleted some roads and remapped them anew in this changeset. It's good practice to modify the geometry of existing roads rather than delete them and remap them anew. It helps preserve their editing history on OSM.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181017143
Frank Peng (2026-04-07 20:34:22+00:00): Please modify the geometry of existing roads on OSM instead of deleting them and redrawing them anew, in accordance with good practice on OSM.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181017425
headalves (2026-04-07 19:41:07+00:00): and can turn right in the right lane as well, forgot to mention in the comment.
aixbrick (2026-04-08 06:47:09+00:00): Hallo,
"bin=yes" besagt nur, dass es einen Mülleimer gibt. Dieser kann zusätzlich separat gemappt sein, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:bin.
Bitte also nicht löschen.
Gruß
LingM (2026-04-08 16:17:20+00:00): Naja, es gibt sicherlich Situationen wo das Sinn macht.

Gerade wenn es nur einen gibt und der - wie hier - am Mast der Haltestelle befestigt ist, sehe ich das aber als übertrieben an.

Die Mülleimer an Aachener Bushaltestellen sind fast nie separat gemappt. Aus Konsistenzgründen wäre es daher besser die Handvoll Abwechler anzupassen.

~LingM
aixbrick (2026-04-08 16:44:51+00:00): Bei "bin=yes" ist aber nicht ersichtlich, *wo* sich der Mülleimer befindet. Er kann sich auch im Umfeld der Haltestelle befinden.
Dieselbe DIskussion wurde auch schon mit "shelter=yes" und separat gemappten Häuschen geführt. Ergebnis: Die Erfassung als Tag am Mast sagt nichts über die konkrete Position aus, daher ist es durchaus korrekt die Objekte nochmal separat zu mappen. Im Zweifel trägt den der nächste Mapper ohnehin wieder ein - auch an anderen Haltestellen.
aixbrick (2026-04-15 08:21:51+00:00): Mülleimer wiederhergestellt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181354900
Admasawi (2026-04-15 16:17:03+00:00): Correction: Source used was Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2024-05-30; Strava
Frank Peng (2026-04-07 20:40:39+00:00): I see that you deleted some buildings and remapped them anew in this changeset. Please just modify the geometry of existing buildings on OSM instead of deleting them and remapping them anew. It follows good practice on OSM and helps preserve the element's editing history.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181018115
Frank Peng (2026-04-07 20:42:49+00:00): Please modify the geometry of the existing buildings instead of deleting them and remapping them anew. It helps preserve their editing history on OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181018326
NeisBot (2026-04-07 20:06:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1243148292 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Apartment complex"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-15 22:33:11+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181389548
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
MappingMore (2026-04-08 09:21:19+00:00):  Revert of 181004257
marco406 (2026-06-06 20:23:11+00:00): Cześć. Na jakiej podstawie zmieniłeś tracktype dla dróg leśnych w rejonie Lubina/Legnicy?
felipeeugenio (2026-04-08 13:05:58+00:00): Hola. Si el predio ya tiene todos los tags con las direcciones, no hace falta agregarlos a los edificios interiores.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181019756
felipeeugenio (2026-04-08 13:07:46+00:00): Y por favor usar la letra Q para cuadrar edificios. Ademas se puede usar copy-paste. Están todas las casas descuadradas y diferentes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181019756
felipeeugenio (2026-04-08 13:10:34+00:00): Además las dibujó pegadas, siendo que el pareo es solo de a 2. Voy a eliminar todo y hacerlo bien, pero por favor tomar nota.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181019756
b-holdet (2026-04-08 04:22:46+00:00): Den forrige version med alt_name="Sct Jørgens Gade" var ok. Nu har du lagt samme navn i name=* og alt_name=*
Så noten skulle blot lukkes.
Du skal ikke tage højde for, hvad renderen genererer i kortet.
b-holdet (2026-04-08 04:24:11+00:00): Læs evt. med her:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vejnavne-med-forkortelser/134765
b-holdet (2026-04-09 19:13:12+00:00): @Mic0000
Kig gerne i dette changeset for at få en ide om hvad der bør gøres:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181113784
martianfreeloader (2026-05-12 17:24:53+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contribution to OSM.

You've added a lot nodes for climbing sites. However, for these climbing sites, there are already existing ways, for example you've created https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13714772713, although https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680223515 already exists. Hence, there are now duplicates (2 OSM objects for one real-world feature), which is undesirable.
Gruemscheler (2026-05-29 08:53:49+00:00): Hi martianfreeloader

It is not clear if node or way is better/right:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Climbing

Idea is, that climbers find the spots on every map. Some maps display only nodes, other just ways (cliffs).

Not sure if node or way to delete (if at all.)
martianfreeloader (2026-05-29 15:48:15+00:00): Since a way is more detailed than a node I'd prefer a way; otherwise there's a loss of information.

Generally it's considered bad style to (mis)map for the renderer.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
muphin (2026-04-08 06:03:15+00:00): Je hebt het Rivierabad als retail getagd, maar dat lijkt me niet juist. De wiki zegt dat er een tag voor zwembad is.
muphin (2026-04-08 06:05:02+00:00): Zelfde geldt voor de bioscoop ernaast - ook dat is geen winkelpand
juni_vv (2026-04-08 15:33:50+00:00): Hee ik zie het inderdaad, ik zal vast hebben zitten slapen... Ik ga ze corrigeren! Bedankt voor je comment!
mikita_paloika (2026-04-09 07:18:17+00:00): Hello MapMold!

Thank you for your contributions to the map in this area. I noticed your recent edits adding buildings and addresses here, but I'm having trouble seeing these structures on the available satellite imagery (Bing/Esri).

Could you please clarify if these are newly constructed buildings or if you are using a different source/local knowledge for this data? It would be great to understand the context to ensure the map remains accurate.

Best regards,
Mikita!
#mapbox_editing
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181020414
eggie (2026-04-08 06:13:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-08 06:15:18+00:00): Beste vyxen. adres 14a heb ik hersteld.

MVG
eggie
ajmat (2026-04-08 16:49:07+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 181059723
eggie (2026-04-08 05:00:47+00:00): Hoi,

Die tags zijn gewoon default. Beter geeb access=yes gaan taggen op wegen.

Tag alleen de uitzonderingen die er niet mogen komen.

Mvg,
eggie
MappingMore (2026-04-08 07:28:12+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181033761
Superadlen (2026-04-08 12:48:08+00:00): merci
MassCartog (2026-04-08 14:47:51+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM, Please don't use the the name tag for a description of things, just use the feature type for that. Name tags should be use for common names communities use, not personal names for things. Thanks

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
rab (2026-04-07 22:37:01+00:00): The data you appear to be trying to import is of extremely poor quality. Please note that most of the existing buildings were mapped as part of the “Eliminate Malaria” campaign. The project imagery at that time exhibited significant misalignments. As a result, many “Rapid” objects are actually duplicates with slightly different coordinates. Furthermore, both the “Rapid” data and the existing data appear to be outdated.  Please remove  these building outlines or verify them manually.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
Matmat-25 (2026-04-08 06:19:46+00:00): de 57 à 44
puis de 44 à 60 places ?
NeisBot (2026-04-07 22:30:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13714839356 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Scenic air tour route"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-15 22:33:15+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181389553
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
MassCartog (2026-04-09 14:22:56+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. Not sure if you work for onxmaps, but wanted to let you know on OSM we do not removed features that exist on the ground. If a feature exists its considered valid and removing it could be considered vandalism of OSM data. 

It sounds like you might be following requests from users, so just wanted to make you aware of how OSM works. A real feature being on private property is not a valid reason to remove data.

Feel free to use OSM's tagging system, things like access=private if that is applicable. Thanks for your work updating OSM data in other areas!
4hogo (2026-04-11 05:19:36+00:00): Points on the two buildings at the top of the map were snapped together. Minor issue. Thanks for your contribution.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181023352
literan (2026-04-08 19:45:30+00:00): hgv=no на этой улице это какой знак? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41388052#map=18/55.811665/37.360565&layers=N

кирпич для грузовиков?
neo-plan (2026-04-09 00:37:54+00:00): Почему "кирпич"?! Кирпич - это только въезд запрещён. Там знак ПДД 3.4 «Движение грузовых автомобилей запрещено».
literan (2026-04-09 07:16:43+00:00): ну вы уж почитайте ПДД наконец. Знак 3.4 не запрещает полностью движение грузовых, если пункт назначения на этой улице, то их движение возможно. Соответственно, тег должен быть не hgv=no, а hgv=destination

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Дорожные_знаки_России#Запрещающие_знаки

много вы уже где таких мнимых "кирпичей" наставили в базе? хорошо бы исправить. И тут исправите?
neo-plan (2026-04-09 08:21:57+00:00): Где вы в ПДД нашли такое исключение, что "знак 3.4 не запрещает полностью движение грузовых, если пункт назначения на этой улице, то их движение возможно". Есть только небольшие исключения "Знак 3.4 не запрещает движение грузовых автомобилей, предназначенных для перевозки людей, транспортных средств организаций федеральной почтовой связи, имеющих на боковой поверхности белую диагональную полосу на синем фоне, эмблему организаций федеральной почтовой связи, надпись "Почта России" или белую продольную полосу на синем фоне, эмблему организации специальной почтовой связи, надпись "Спецсвязь", а также грузовых автомобилей без прицепа с разрешенной максимальной массой не более 26 тонн, которые обслуживают предприятия, находящиеся в обозначенной зоне. В этих случаях транспортные средства должны въезжать в обозначенную зону и выезжать из нее на ближайшем к месту назначения перекрестке." В РФ, если можно проехать к пункту назначения, ставят "Движение запрещено" с табличкой "Грузовикам". Знак "Кирпич" запрещает только въезд, когда с другой его стороны может не быть запрета. В вики по вашим ссылкам тоже нет однозначного ответа. Думаю, запрет вполне уместен. Исключения сами проедут. Никто же в парках культуры и отдыха не ставит тег destination, потому что туда, в виде исключения, коммунальные грузовики заезжают по велодорожкам?!
literan (2026-04-09 09:29:55+00:00): вот здесь нашел, в вашей цитате:
" которые обслуживают предприятия, находящиеся в обозначенной зоне. В этих случаях транспортные средства должны въезжать в обозначенную зону и выезжать из нее на ближайшем к месту назначения перекрестке."

именно это и означает hgv=destination

где вы там в вики не увидели однозначного ответа, я не погнимаю, там напротив знака 3.4 однозначно написано: "hgv=destination + agricultural=destination (если на знаке не указан вес)"

простите, я не будщу тратить врем я, это абсолютно очевидно, так замаплена вся РФ, а договорились до такого использования еще 10 лет назад.

вы будете исправлять свои ошибки?
literan (2026-04-09 09:33:30+00:00): а при чем тут велодорожки, я вообще не понимаю. Мы обсуждаем здесь улицы, элементы дорожно-уличной сети, и возможность проезда по ним ЛЮБОГО грузовика, обслуживающего предприятия в этйо зоне (предприятие это десткий сад, магазин, что угодно).
neo-plan (2026-04-09 10:30:03+00:00): >вы будете исправлять свои ошибки?
На этой улице Красногорска, исправлю.

>а при чем тут велодорожки
Потому что там, в ПДД для знака грузовикам, позволено отступать от запрета только узкому кругу перечисленных грузовиков. Там нет такого, что всем, кому туда нужно, могут игнорировать знак. А поставив тег destination грузовики с прицепом, например, поедут под нарушение, когда с другой стороны для них может быть специальный проезд.
literan (2026-04-09 11:18:42+00:00): >Там нет такого, что всем, кому туда нужно, могут игнорировать знак. 

как раз таки именно есть такое. "которые обслуживают предприятия, находящиеся в обозначенной зоне" означает что даже, например, грузовик-доставщик "Озона" или "Петровича", если у него есть этот адрес в путевом листе, легально проезжает под этот знак. 

что касается коммунальных машин с красными проблесковыми маячками или, тем паче, машин с синими, они вообще где угодно могут заезжать, хоть на детские площадки. Так что им наши OSM-ограничения не указ, их мы не учитываем.
Glassman (2026-04-08 22:51:36+00:00): #TIP: unclassified is just a residential road, except in rural areas. I changed it to a service road. Feel free to correct if I'm wrong.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181023430
Rogoyski (2026-04-21 19:03:06+00:00): Dlaczego skasowałeś z parkingu, np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1040646516/history/3 tagi street_side i private?
Udarian (2026-04-08 01:07:59+00:00): I didn't notice the hashtag got copied over to this changeset, that wasn't intended.
b-jazz (2026-04-11 16:09:51+00:00): When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. Take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Golf.png for an example of the "Wrong" way to map a fairway and a green, along with the correct way. There are some cases where a fringe exists around a green and you should draw the fairway outline completely around a green, leaving room for the fringe. Other times, the fairway and green butt up against each other. In that case the fairway and green should share the same nodes at the boundary between the two, and every node at the boundary needs to be shared, leaving no gaps. When drawing these shared nodes, editors like iD (built into openstreetmap.org) will "snap" to an existing node if you get close enough. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out. Thanks.
0000FF berries (2026-04-11 11:07:47+00:00): Hi there :) Thanks for improving Piraeus :)

With this changeset, there are now two elevators mapped at approximately the same location, while only one elevator is physically there:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13266762105
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13715066097

You could consider adding the relation to the older node, and removing the newer one.

Thanks again for the improvements  and happy mapping :)
ultramarinemotley (2026-05-07 22:46:33+00:00): there are in fact two elevators there.
NeisBot (2026-04-07 23:24:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 17 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1039099819 v3 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1426017448 v2 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/9569024111 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181023750
iandees (2026-04-08 01:48:53+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9566871999, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9569024110 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181026122, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Hans Thompson (2026-04-08 01:59:40+00:00): I don't believe the tennis courts have been named but they are within the Taku Park.  This is an example of where the de facto naming convention should be followed for edtiting osm.  I may be wrong but I would assume someone would say "Let's go to Taku Park to play Tennis" instead of "Let's go to the Taku Lake Park Tennis Courts".
Chezfisto (2026-04-08 16:18:14+00:00): That's fair, renamed
iandees (2026-04-08 01:48:49+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9295718373 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181026121, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Wildsharky (2026-04-13 11:00:15+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181078576
AndyB_66 (2026-05-17 11:04:09+00:00): W takim razie jest to problem aplikacji, a nie mapy. Edycję wycofuję.
AndyB_66 (2026-05-17 11:07:20+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182778280
Hans Thompson (2026-04-08 01:54:10+00:00): Hi, I've been reviewing your edits and I think they are very good. One issue with the changeset that I see though is listing the Campbell Creek Greenbelt as limited as the area only the creek between minnesota and dowling. It should extend further and be one object or a multipolygon.  Would you consider this revisal?
Chezfisto (2026-04-08 16:17:19+00:00): I think that makes sense. The 'park' tag was preexisting in that range and I just put a name to it. I agree that it should go further in both directions, but didn't have the time to add all that in.
vojtechzaboril (2026-04-18 14:28:05+00:00): Hi,
I'm not sure, if this route will be reopened as oneway? Or is it open as oneway now and in the end of April it will be fully opened?
I'm writting it because few of our user reported, that the route is opened now (as oneway).
Thanks for clarification.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2026-04-18 19:42:33+00:00): Hi, it will be permanent one way from Pedra Rija to west, like I edited. Regional government announced it last week. Here's the details https://www.facebook.com/groups/madeira.walking/posts/27290472517220447/
vojtechzaboril (2026-04-18 19:51:24+00:00): Thanks, there is also written "Initial access likely Friday to Sunday". Is that mean that the opening is in this weekend?
vojtechzaboril (2026-04-18 19:53:33+00:00): Sry, I got it: it opens after MIUT and only for Fri-Sun for some time. After it will be full-week-opened.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2026-04-18 19:54:12+00:00): Affirmative, right after the ending of Madeira Island Ultra Trail 2026.
iandees (2026-04-08 01:49:04+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1975764863 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181026127, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
felipeeugenio (2026-04-08 12:40:25+00:00): Las calles no tienen direcciones. saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181024695
rskedgell (2026-04-08 10:51:15+00:00): I see that you have created railway=crossing nodes where the newly added sidewalk on the S side of Elizabeth Bridge crosses the Chatham Main Line tracks at the throat of Victoria Station.

The reason why iD gave a warning about a highway crossing a railway is because the user who added the sidewalk failed to recognize that it is a bridge and should have been tagged with bridge=yes and layer=1

Unquestioningly accepting iD's first suggestion of adding a level crossing is unacceptably sloppy when there is no evidence of this in the aerial imagery.

You should also ask yourself "How likely is it, that in the centre of a major European city, that a sidewalk would cross a railway line by a level crossing (or a watercourse by a ford)?" This answer to this is "Extremely unlikely."