piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DrF_Master7 (2025-05-17 09:28:45+00:00): Os percursos do Oeiras Valley Shuttle também foram confirmados no terreno, como anteriormente dito. Entretanto, deixo a questão de que outras fontes poderiam ser usadas para confirmar (se não for apenas o percurso no terreno) que este serviço existe sim e que seria importante estar aqui? Ademais, se a questão eventualmente for ao nome das ruas em si, não houve mudanças ao nome delas, apenas adicionadas a esta relação.

The Oeiras Valley Shuttle routes have also been confirmed on the ground, as previously stated. However, I wonder what other sources could be used to confirm (if not just the route on the ground) that this service does exist and that it would be important for it to be here? In addition, if the question eventually arises about the names of the streets, there have been no changes to their names, only additions to this relation.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-20 02:03:53+00:00): Thank you!
CurlingMan13 (2025-05-17 16:45:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Good edit
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166367909
Udarian (2025-05-16 20:28:25+00:00): typo, port Miami.
CurlingMan13 (2025-05-17 16:44:57+00:00): You can combine the areas and go across the roads, you don't need to divide it up by block.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166368029
Aelxen (2025-05-18 12:18:56+00:00): I thought it was cleaner to do it square by square than to go all the way round the area. This was also advice I'd received from other contributors I know.
lunar_jaws812 (2025-05-16 20:24:00+00:00): Meant to say west entrance oof
5m4u9 (2025-05-17 02:02:49+00:00): hola, bienvenid@!

tengo duda, este lugar que añadiste es la oficina de la empresa? o el lugar donde estará el área de tratamiento? 🤔🤔
OSQUICH (2025-05-20 21:04:20+00:00): Hola, es el actual sitio de construcción, donde estará la futura Planta
eggie (2025-05-17 04:58:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Alle begin is moeilijk. Het aan de landuse geplakte rondje heb ik losgemaakt.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Walter Mayeku (2025-05-26 09:20:32+00:00): Hello @charles chilufya
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I wanted to enquire about the imagery used in this changeset. 
It shows that you used Esri World Imagery but unfortunately it doesn't align with the ESRI on my end. 

Could be an issue of working with an offset already?
bxl-forever (2025-05-17 09:50:29+00:00): Hello,

There might be a validation problem here.

I see you merged stop_area relations and have one single relation to group all the stops.  I won’t reopen this eternal debate but at least inform you of something: "name:operator:TEC" is not the same for tram and bus stops here, as I can see, so it should either be removed from the relation, or you should have separate relations for each mode of transport.

That said, the current practice in Belgium is one platform = one relation, it might sound complicated to some but is much easier to unambiguously pair stop position nodes with the platform.  I recommend you would keep to this established practice.

Thanks.
lunar_jaws812 (2025-05-16 20:45:20+00:00): Somehow, I unintentionally changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/760495573

I intended to change only https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38269227

I'm new to OSM and don't know how to revert, so I'd appreciate if someone else reverts the changes so I don't mess things up further. I apologize....
Nakaner (2025-06-02 15:14:30+00:00): Hallo,

du hast in diesem Änderungssatz ein Verbot zur Benutzung der B 2 zwischen Pratau und Wittenberg für zu Fuß Gehende eingetragen. Auf anderen Abschnitten der B 2 waren seit Jahren solche Verbote erfasst, die auf jüngeren Mapillary-Bildern nicht nachvollziehbar sind.

Wo stehen denn die Verkehrszeichen, die auf dem o.g. Straßenabschnitt das Gehen verbieten?

Viele Grüße

Michael
MartinonTour (2025-06-02 15:52:31+00:00): Hallo Michael,
danke für dein Prüfen, soll schließlich alles seine Richtigkeit haben.

Du hast Recht, es gibt keine Beschilderung dafür, aber auf dieser Strecke gibt es überall einen vorgesehenen Parallelweg für Fußgänger, der meistens gemeinsamer Fuß- und Radweg ist. Laut § 25 Abs. 1 StVO darf die Bundesstraße nur zu Fuß begangen werden, "wenn die Straße weder einen Gehweg noch einen Seitenstreifen hat." Ich wollte mit dem explizitem Verbot dafür sorgen, dass alle Navigationen explizit den gemeinsamen Fuß- und Radweg nutzen und nicht einfach die Bundesstraße.

Es gibt aber zwischendurch Etappen südlich dieses Bearbeitungsbereichs, wo die Bundesstraße kein parallelen Fußweg hat. Wäre da die Nutzung als Fußgänger erlaubt?

Grüße
Martin
Nakaner (2025-06-02 20:42:06+00:00): Hallo Martin,

wir unterscheiden in OSM zwischen dem (Nicht-)Vorhandensein von Gehwegen und explizit beschilderten Verboten. Ersteres geschieht mit den Tags sidewalk=*, sidewalk:both=*, sidewalk:left=* und sidewalk:right=*. Gibt man "no" als Value an, heißt das, dass es keinen gibt. "separate" verwendet man für einen separaten Gehweg.

Nur dort, wo es explizite Verbote gibt, verwendet man foot=no.

StreetComplete unterscheidet dies auch in den Fragestellungen.

Ich werde daher diesen Änderungssatz rückgängig machen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Sylabowy Kot (2025-05-16 20:43:54+00:00): Jak ktoś nie wierzy w tak dziwną nazwę oto źródło: https://mazowiecki.pzd.pl/termin-skladania-wnioskow-w-gminie-puszcza-marianska/
eggie (2025-05-17 05:17:07+00:00): Het pad heb ik losgemaakt van de landuse.
gr eggie
eggie (2025-05-17 05:26:30+00:00): Het pad heb ik doorvebonden met de weg. Het eindigde p[ de landuse.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166368833

mvg
eggie
Markus366 (2025-05-19 08:49:08+00:00): Hallo.

Meinem Kenntnisstand nach dürfen die Daten aus dem Geoportal von Thüringen nicht genutzt werden, da die Lizenz für osm leider nicht passt. 

Gibt es da einen neuen Sachstand? Sonst müssten die Änderungen wieder entfernt werden.

Gruß Markus
tst1979 (2025-05-19 19:42:16+00:00): Hallo Markus,
ich habe ja die Daten "nur" abgezeichnet. Nicht direkt genutzt.

Grundsätzlich hast du recht. THüringen besteht bei einer direkten Nutzung seiner DAten auf die Namensnennung, also keine 100 % open source.
https://geomis.geoportal-th.de/geonetwork/srv/ger/catalog.search#/metadata/dd467a9a-c5a7-400e-90b0-aeb1cba90eda

Neuerdings wird aber im Josm sogar die Luftbilder von THüringen, des Thür. Landesamtes, als "Hintergrund" angeboten. Dann dürfte das ja auch nicht sein, ohne Namensnennung?!?

Habt ihr das im Forum schon besprochen.
VG
Tobias
Markus366 (2025-05-20 10:49:45+00:00): Hallo.
Das abzeichnen der Hausnummer, also deren richtige Zuordnung zum jeweiligen Ort ist wahrscheinlich der Kern des Problems.

Der letzte mit bekannte Sachstand ist u.a. hier zu finden
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/open-data-in-thuringen-neuerungen/75293 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/liste-der-geoportale-de/107754/3 
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/80456/unerlaubte-quelle-angegeben-was-tun 

Ich schlage vor, du nimmst Verbindung mit der Data Working Group auf und fragst nach, wie du dich verhalten sollst. Andernfalls wäre das wohl ein Urheberrechtsverstoß durch osm.
eggie (2025-05-17 05:21:35+00:00): Dag Mirjam.. Het pad heb ik losgemaakt van de landuse en de naam voetpad naar straat verwijderd. Dat ia geen straatnaam.

MVG
eggie
stasiu512 (2025-05-17 17:17:48+00:00): Cześć, oneway=yes nie może być wg wiki używany na węzłach. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway=yes?uselang=pl
Sunset_Sakura (2025-05-17 02:19:47+00:00): Heyy, streetside parking should be mapped slightly differently. Individual parking spaces are as parking space, and then there should be an area covering each section of them as a streetside parking. Have a look at what I corrected them to :3
catgirlseraid (2025-05-17 09:43:34+00:00): thanks <3
Alvarado2510 (2025-06-09 18:44:14+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=8.4240443&lng=-82.4234805&z=19.369920421548024&pKey=723168136889879&focus=photo&x=0.7264315984274871&y=0.26154543466138364&zoom=2.998822587703146
nombre de la calle.
Ërnest (2025-06-10 02:58:54+00:00): Hola. Hasta cierto punto podría llamarse asi en el área del Barrio Bolívar.  Generalmente es Calle Octava.  
Saludos
nevw (2025-05-17 01:45:53+00:00): Hi, you have placed two defibrillators here, one on top of the other.
Are there two here or should I delete one?
CurlingMan13 (2025-05-17 16:42:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Good edit.  Just make sure you aren't just copying addresses from Google since that is not allowed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166370525
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-05-17 22:03:37+00:00): Hello, why did you change the road names and numbers? I used the street signs (on-the-ground rule) for the classification of those roads. There's literally a sign that says "EXPRESSWAY ENDS," so the roadway east of that should not be tagged with highway=motorway.
Joseph R P (2025-05-18 19:03:34+00:00): Route 564 ends right at the Beltway and the Beltway starts right at the convergence of the I 11 ramps. The 'freeway ends' sign as a yellow advisory sign implies that the freeway is about to end rather than a marker that the freeway has ended at that precise location.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-05-18 20:22:38+00:00): Okay. I got these instructions from the wiki, specifically the entry for that yellow "FREEWAY ENDS" advisory sign, which says, word for word, "End highway=motorway at this point."
Joseph R P (2025-05-18 23:52:17+00:00): Which OSM Wiki article did you refer to? Generally the white 'end freeway' signs (which I believe are California exclusive) are the only ones followed as official freeway termini on OSM that I know of, as white road signs indicate a set-in-stone rule while yellow signs (aka advisory signs) provide warnings to drivers about what is coming up ahead.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-05-19 02:57:20+00:00): Here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MUTCD/W#W19:_End_of_Controlled_Access_Highway
The "FREEWAY ENDS" sign is, indeed, yellow.
vasony (2025-06-01 10:17:11+00:00): Szia!

Honnan van a Séta köz név? A földhivatal szerint amit átneveztél az Viola utca, megváltozott a neve?

Tamás
ivanbranco (2026-03-22 12:20:07+00:00): Hi Seandebasti,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12528767102

what's the meaning of height:range=12? Usually this tag contains ranges of heights (e.g ">24", "5 to 6 m", "5-6" ecc.).

thanks and good mapping
Seandebasti (2026-03-22 19:31:13+00:00): thanks for the question, it is the maximum height what this plant could get. it is project data written on a sign in front of the plant
Tomas Straupis (2025-05-17 06:01:40+00:00): Hello. Reviewed the change, landuse=basin was the correct tagging, changed back. landuse polygons should not leave small gaps, fixed that as well. Good luck!
CurlingMan13 (2025-05-17 16:41:17+00:00): It saved and is published!  Welcome to OSM.  Good edit.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166371128
dpolovinkin (2025-10-09 12:52:21+00:00): hi, thanks for contribution! in future please base objects of the buildings not where the roof is situated on the satellite, but where the buildings stands on the ground, otherwise the position will be incorrect like here, where it's obvious it's positioned on the roof - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1387390138

thanks! :)
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-17 22:55:42+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее
newkmv (2025-05-18 12:29:45+00:00): Я новичок в OSM.
Мне нужно было сослаться на ESRI, как обоснования для изменения?
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-18 12:34:18+00:00): Не, просто вижу что у вас старый бинг включен. Вдруг захотите уточнить округу по свежим снимкам)
newkmv (2025-05-18 12:48:08+00:00): Буду иметь в виду!
Большое спасибо!
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-05-17 20:55:45+00:00): Hello. Where did you get the name "East North Belt Road" from? According to Google Maps Street View, at the intersection with Tropical Parkway, the street is signed as "Centennial Parkway," and the on-the-ground rule takes precedence.
Joseph R P (2025-05-18 18:57:10+00:00): I have informed you before to please not use Google Maps for mapping in OpenStreetMap. OSM as a free open-source project cannot use this data due to legal restrictions. Please see here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

As for the road's name, the county's GIS shows that the road's official name is E. North Belt Road and that the businesses along it are addressed to the road. It is likely that at the time of the image capture you viewed was before the official name change or before the signs were updated. The on-the-ground rule typically applies but should be taken with a grain of salt in the prospect of road signs as they can be outdated or outright incorrect occasionally.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-05-18 20:19:34+00:00): I used Google Maps Street View because I can't think of any other good, updated street-level imagery source. I'll admit that the street view images of that road are about two years old. Also, what's a GIS, and how can I access it for future reference?
Joseph R P (2025-05-18 23:48:50+00:00): The county's GIS (Geographical Information System) would be the Clark County OpenWeb. Most counties in the US will have their own equivalent to this (for example, here is Nye County's: https://portico.mygisonline.com/html5/?viewer=nyenv), and as far as I know, it is free to use as a source for mapping on OSM as it is government-provided. 99 times out of 100 these maps will be more reliable than Google Maps or any other copyrighted map as the latter will often add fake street/place names to catch users redistributing the data without a license. Unfortunately, when it comes to street view as a source, the biggest three options we could use as mappers on OSM are the two provided in the iD Editor (Mapillary and Bing Streetside) and viewing it in person. Luckily, street view is only important for more meticulous things, and road names can usually easily be obtained through county GIS maps.
whammo (2025-05-18 00:19:08+00:00): Hi alstond, welcome to OSM. Can you explain your rationale here for changing this to motorway? Generally, highway hierarchy and tagging is pretty well thought out in the DMV area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166371510
alstond981 (2025-05-18 02:56:42+00:00): Hi whammo, this section of road is fully limited-access and has no ground-level pedestrian crossings, which is why I updated it to motorway. If there are any other criteria that are needed for a motorway, please let me know.
whammo (2025-05-18 12:00:10+00:00): I think the 45 mph speed limit and the tight exits and entry from North Queen Street are suggestive that this isn't really a motorway. If you look through the history, this stretch has gone back and forth quite a bit, but I trust Joseph RP's judgement since he's done a lot of this in the area, and it looks like he ultimately settled on highway=trunk. You can check out the tagging guidance for Virginia here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Virginia/Highway_classification#Motorway.
Joseph R P (2025-05-18 13:39:39+00:00): Hello, I downgraded this section of Route 50 to trunk for reasons whammo suggested. It has tight ramps, a relatively low speed limit, low/narrow medians, sidewalks separated by a curb and grass, and level crossings on the ramps adjacent to the main carriageways. While it is common for some freeways to have one or two of these characteristics, all of them in one road can indicate that it is more of an arterial road that is controlled by ramps (rather than a freeway), which is a good candidate for highway=trunk/primary/etc. and expressway=yes tagging.
alstond981 (2025-05-18 13:43:52+00:00): Hi Joseph RP, thanks for letting me know and explaining why it isn’t a motorway.
todeveni (2025-05-29 13:16:52+00:00): Hei. Pyöräily ei ole (näillä) ratsastuspoluilla kielletty. Moottoriajoneuvolla ajo kielletty -kyltit löytyy jokseenkin alueen päistä.
Ei tietty ole suositeltavaa pyöräillä täällä, mutta kiellettyä se ei ole.
ilias_ (2025-05-17 01:43:05+00:00): Hi, the ref RP4266 was added in this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164972655

The user has access to an updated list of roads in the country, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/morocco-maroc-reseau-routier-mise-a-jour-2025-01/128074

Your source is from 2019, so I believe the reference was correct.
Cyrille37 (2025-05-17 17:45:20+00:00): Hi @osm10005

Indeed, the CNER give us, via talk-ma@, a 2024 update as a reference for 2025.

We can talk about in the discussion cited by @ilias.

Thanks & cheers
Cyrille37
Cyrille37 (2025-05-18 07:31:13+00:00): L'ATLAS A3 en PDF est dispo sur la page dédiée: https://map.comptoir.net/maroc-reseau-routier-2025-01/
osm10005 (2025-05-21 15:36:21+00:00): Thank you very much. I have checked the new card and canceled the change.
Cyrille37 (2025-05-21 16:26:19+00:00): I'm happy to read you. The roads network update is a big challenge :-)
Glassman (2025-05-17 22:33:59+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. Though sheds usually don't have an address. If there isn't a main address for the property, I'd add one to the main house or business.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166372473
CurlingMan13 (2025-05-17 16:40:27+00:00): Edit reviewed.  Good edit.  Welcome to OSM
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166372637
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-17 01:34:16+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality & personal info

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166373955
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-17 01:34:17+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality & personal info

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166373955
CodyNZL (2025-05-22 09:54:40+00:00): This was mapping a historic cycle route. It is not to say that you have any legal ability to use it or that all parts of it even exist today.
felipeeugenio (2025-05-17 13:08:24+00:00): Hola. por favor no borrar elementos existentes, o al menos dar una explicación de porqué las borra. Gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166374782
Roydon Olive (2025-05-17 10:07:52+00:00): This street does not exist, I've been there looking for it. Yes I know it is in the city of winnipeg streets data, but there are plenty of streets in that data that do not exist. I am going to revert this.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-17 03:11:12+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166375019
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-20 01:27:38+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18247
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-01 06:09:58+00:00): DWG revert - apparent spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167036224
Glassman (2025-05-17 22:34:40+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375205
Glassman (2025-05-17 22:35:03+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375279
Glassman (2025-05-17 22:35:41+00:00): It is a good idea to add a tag with the type of business. Can you add one for the body shop?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375357
Glassman (2025-05-17 22:38:43+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

It wouldn't hurt to also add the tag, access=private.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375371
Glassman (2025-05-17 22:39:06+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375476
JezCrow (2025-05-19 19:08:48+00:00): I've reverted this changeset in order to re-instate mass-deletions from user:WCCAlex

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166492869
Glassman (2025-05-17 22:36:07+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375608
Glassman (2025-05-17 22:39:25+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375677
Glassman (2025-05-17 22:36:19+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375737
aweech (2025-05-19 16:26:45+00:00): Hi! Do you have any more information about when all of these median barriers were installed? And what the project's name was? I was there on Saturday, and I don't remember seeing them. Are they just smaller than the usual barrier?
Sagei (2025-05-20 11:22:14+00:00): Right--forgot to add all those in. There is a cement barrier that divides the East/West traffic flow around the I-15 interchange to Digital Dr on Timpanogos Hwy (along with barriers for traffic getting on the northbound connector for I-15 and where the 284 Exit road connects with Ridge Dr at Timpanogos Hwy to allow for East/West connections to Timpanogos Hwy, north-/south-bound I-15, and southbound Thanksgiving Way), a physical barrier that protects the pedestrian bridge pillar between Digital Dr and Triumph Blvd on the same thoroughfare, a physical barrier that protects where the road divides between the highway and the commuter lane, cement islands on Digital Dr at Stockton Ln and the Audi lot due west of Stockton, and a cement island on Digital Drive at the intersection of Ridge Dr. The only other medians in the area are designated by street paint--i.e., the west-bound turn lane on the northbound side of Digital Dr., and the areas not covered by the median at the interchange or the physical barrier between Digital Dr and Triumph Blvd. I'm personally not aware of any plans to add medians along Digital Dr given how narrow the road is, so I think that's more a question for the city engineers.
aweech (2025-05-20 13:08:54+00:00): Great thank you! I was just confused since I didn't see anything when I went through the other day, but also I wasn't really paying attention. Have a good day!
Sagei (2025-05-20 13:59:41+00:00): No problem. I've added the barrier to changeset 166520693 if you want to reference.
Glassman (2025-05-17 22:39:38+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375785
Glassman (2025-05-17 22:36:44+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375798
Glassman (2025-05-17 22:36:58+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375839
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-17 04:35:46+00:00): DWG revert - fictitious mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166375970
Glassman (2025-05-17 22:39:49+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375859
Glassman (2025-05-17 22:37:08+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166375883