piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
clay_c (2023-08-16 13:36:56+00:00): Hi DawsZed, I have a question unrelated to the previous feedback.

The tunnel box under Hudson Yards was originally mapped from satellite imagery a few years ago when it was still exposed to the surface. I see that you used an angled photo of the tunnel box to adjust the tunnel edges. Tracing from aerial imagery usually allows for more precision than eyeballing from a photo. Were there any other sources you used here?
DawsZed (2023-08-28 21:24:54+00:00): Hey clay_c, I don't remember exactly... but, my best guess was that I used both the EIS (which showed completed sections of the tunnel box) and the photo. The EIS was showing slightly further construction different than the photo, and I think I approximated the ends to account for uncertainty?
If you did see imagery years ago, and the photo backed up what you saw, you've got ground truth on your side; feel free to correct my mistake (I'm not sure how to do it myself)
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-29 00:09:24+00:00): I am aware of the project and know it is to be completed in the distant future.  While I am generally against mapping things that don't exist, this one is coming to fruition and construction has begun.  (unlike those "razed"/"historic" railways that were completely demolished and removed, yet keep getting readded to the map by a few editors)

My issue is that it is tagged as layer=-3 and level=-3, even on the parts that are clearly going to be above ground or a bridge.  This is clearly incorrect on the side by Secaucus Junction.
DawsZed (2023-08-29 18:50:05+00:00): That's a good point CurlingMan, I was honestly worried this huge edit would render on the raster map, so I think I tagged the whole line on -3 in the hopes it would disappear if it did ahaha
IsStatenIsland (2026-06-17 23:12:02+00:00): I'm 3 years late and I was the one who put the box down in 2018.

It is an actual feature and was visible in aerial imagery.
lipuma (2023-06-13 13:43:14+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! Why did you add this node here? And what does this tag mean?

Rua=Pessegueiros, 6 - Capela Velha, Araucária - PR, 83705-530

Did you try to add an address? Check out the wiki for more information about OSM and tags:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page

---

TRADUZIDO PARA O PORTUGUÊS:

Olá, bem-vindo ao OSM! Porque é que adicionou este nó aqui? E o que significa esta etiqueta?

Rua=Pessegueiros, 6 - Capela Velha, Araucária - PR, 83705-530

Você tentou adicionar um endereço? Consulte a wiki para obter mais informações sobre o OSM e as etiquetas:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page
silversurfer83 (2023-06-14 12:37:16+00:00): Gude :)
danke für die Verbesserung. Das VZ250 regelt nur den Zugang für Fahrzeuge, daher lautet der korrekte Wert "vehicle=destination". Dein Wert schließt auch Fußgänger mit ein, was idR nicht korrekt ist :)

Grüße
silversurfer83

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137243571
qualmap (2023-06-14 14:23:57+00:00): Moin,
herzlichen Dank für Info, Wiki-Referenz und Korrektur. Ich bin relativ “neu im Geschäft” und werde bei kommenden Änderungen diese zur persönlichen Lernschleife gerne erst einmal als noch zu überprüfen taggen. Gruß qualmap
silversurfer83 (2023-06-14 15:44:46+00:00): Hi
Danke für die Rückmeldung. Freut mich, wenn hier Neue auch reagieren :)

Bei Fragen immer raus damit. Entweder direkt oder guck mal in einer der vielen Chatgruppen rein (ich persönlich mag die sehr freundliche Truppe im OSM DACH Telegramkanal)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels
flohoff (2023-10-20 07:52:28+00:00): Moin,
du hast hier die zufahrt zur Raststätte Gütersloh mit access=no getagged - Warum?

Da war ja schon ein vehicle=emergency drauf - und das ist eigentlicht richtig und ausreichend oder?


https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155001635/history
DeFra85 (2023-10-25 19:48:59+00:00): Oh, das habe ich nicht gesehen. In ID wird das in der Maske nicht standardmäßig angezeigt
tyfi (2023-06-12 13:02:44+00:00): This affects only the relation names which are, by consensus, not intended for data consumer use. Rather, they are meant for editor disambiguation. Many of these routes had no names, but others used different formats that caused similarly-named routes to appear at wildly different positions in a sorted list, so I am using the format "Missouri Route XX".
pesec (2023-06-13 05:16:49+00:00): Добрый день.
Необходимо добавлять только те данные, которые присутствуют в реальности. То, чего нет, отмечать не нужно. Так вы только забиваете базу данных излишней информацией, усложняя её обработку.
Если кнопки нет, то и отмечать это не нужно.
literan (2023-06-13 19:51:51+00:00): это не название, а текст с вывески
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-12 14:00:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10970696153
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10970696154

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
nowhereman (2023-06-12 13:57:43+00:00): #3615806
nowhereman (2023-06-12 14:03:06+00:00): https://westnordost.de/p/138920.jpg
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-12 14:10:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, usuń addr:place i zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, pozostaw tylko addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10970696153
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10970696154

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-06-26 16:48:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158935404 voce mudou o tipo desta linha de via para linha arvores, porque fez isto?
traveleditor (2023-06-13 07:58:07+00:00): Hey, thanks for your contributions! Just a little tip for next time, don't forget to save your changes before you move to the next country :)
user_5359 (2023-06-12 14:49:38+00:00): Hello! Please notice your typo. the key is man_made instead of manmade. 

But I wonder if you don't mean power = minor_line (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key%3Apower) ? 

If you need help for the correction, I can support you with pleasure.
Rik Houthuys (2025-04-18 11:42:18+00:00): Juiste schrijfwijze: Callebaut
joost schouppe (2025-04-18 19:11:25+00:00): Gemixed!
AndersAndersson (2023-06-12 19:45:54+00:00): Kan tipsa om denna 3D-renderare ifall du inte redan känner till den.
https://streets.gl/#60.62077,15.62446,36.75,20.75,757.38
Taya_S (2023-06-12 16:07:43+00:00): Hallo J7876,

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Je vraagt ook om een review. De changeset ziet er goed uit van wat ik kan zien.

Groeten,
Taya
j7876 (2023-06-12 20:08:09+00:00): Hoii taya,

Dank je voor de controle op mijn eerste bijdrage.
aceman444 (2026-03-18 22:26:22+00:00): 'permit' value means that basically everyone gets the permit, just needs to ask for it at some authority. That probably isn't the case here, if it is a private property of the school, it does not give drive through permits to general public.
Mathias_ADAV (2023-08-16 12:39:21+00:00): Bonjour,

un chaucidoux se cartographie comme étant 2 bandes cycalbles sur la rue de l'église, sur une seul voie centrale donc :
cycleway = lane
cycleway:lane = advisory
lanes = 1

je supprime donc l'élement et je rajoute cela sur la voie.

Merci de vous référer au wiki dédié : 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle
Ou a nous envoyé un email pour le cartoggraphier, si vous n’êtes pas sur : carto@droitauvelo.org

Bon mapping !
Mathias
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-06 11:10:11+00:00): The mapping looks fine but it would be great if you could add changeset comment of what you have done. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137248052
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-06-12 14:58:37+00:00): It depends on how you define a supermarket. In some other countries a lot of small shops have "supermarket" in name. One interesting rule for distinguishing supermarkets I've seen is that it has carts in wheels.
dressed-pleasekin (2023-06-23 17:35:26+00:00): Здравствуйте! У вас в этом наборе правок две идентичных точки СДЭК в одном здании - одна явно лишняя:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10971339960
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10971339958
habi (2024-10-14 10:17:07+00:00): Ciao dingobiker
Thanks for the fix here.
Unfortunately, you moved a defibrillator that was aded here onto a pedestrian crossing.
I tried to untangle the mess in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157869215
Greetings,
habi
dingobiker (2024-10-14 10:32:12+00:00): hi habi,
that's nice, thank you for fixing it and letting me know!
bests,
dingobiker
aTarom (2023-06-12 16:51:10+00:00): Hola ramonz, gracias por editar, en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10971375601/history
el name "Mina de l'AIgua"
me puede confirmar que es "Aigua", por la proximidad de la "i" y la "l" en el teclado y no ver la fuente del changeset para contrastar, prefiero preguntarle primero antes de descapitalizar la "I".
Saludos
ramonz (2023-06-12 16:58:46+00:00): es Mina de l'Aigua

gracias
Cucazer (2023-06-12 15:36:39+00:00): Weitere Details wie Gebäude, Wege, Pfade und andere Details müssen noch surveyed werden...
jcr83 (2023-06-12 17:40:35+00:00): Bonjour,
Afin de pouvoir suivre vos modifications, il est recommandé de mettre pour chaque groupe de modifications :
- un commentaire précis
- la source (ou les sources)
Ce groupe de modifications ne contient aucun des deux.
Merci d'avance !
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2023-07-18 12:56:03+00:00): Hello Anne.
I have to thank you for helping UNMappers in our mapping activity.

In this changeset I see you added a wetland area. Probably you were misleaded by the ground color, slightly darker.
To be sure I checked the area with the publicy available Sentinel-2 images; in that area I navigate in time, starting since 2017 till today, but I haven't seen any water or wetland https://apps.sentinel-hub.com/sentinel-playground/?source=S2L2A&lat=2.4156432160366075&lng=45.87013006210327&zoom=16&preset=1_TRUE_COLOR&layers=B01,B02,B03&maxcc=17&gain=1.0&gamma=1.0&time=2017-05-01%7C2017-11-01&atmFilter=&showDates=false

Alessandro
watmildon (2023-08-29 07:06:18+00:00): Hello!

Can you tell me about the tagging on this node? Nakakihara Property (10971419216, v1)

It's quite unusual to have a node with just a name.
Matthew Goolsby (2023-08-29 13:57:47+00:00): I am not following your question.  Could you please rephrase it?

Also, what you have as "Granadier Drive" should instead be "GrEnadier Drive."

Thanks!
watmildon (2023-09-03 17:06:11+00:00): Sorry for the confusion! You added a name to this node in the roadway: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10971419216/history but I suspect it either needs to be on some other feature. It's also possible that this is the name of the people who own it, in which case, it's not suitable for OSM.

I've modified the roadway name as you suggest.
squirrel15841089 (2023-06-12 20:27:12+00:00): While this is indeed a temporary situation, there has been no tram service to Moscou since 2017 and some tracks in Ledebergstraat have been physically removed in 2018, as last verified this month.
Wouldn't it be sensible to remove tracks that have been gone for 5 years and mark unused tracks between Ledebergstraat and Moscou as under construction?
multimob (2023-06-13 16:33:03+00:00): Hi!
2017, time flies, I didn’t realize it was so long.  You are right.  I restored the situation.  My concern was that route relations were being flagged as incorrect but I cleaned them up now and removed the part to Moscou.
Thanks for this.
limes11 (2023-06-12 21:20:18+00:00): Hi,

ich habe das wayside_cross entfernt. Das Gipfelkreuz ist bereits am Peak erfasst. Das Kreuz ist sicher 2.50m hoch. Siehe Video hier:

https://www.aw-wiki.de/index.php/Teufelsley_%28bei_Altenahr%29

Der Pfad nach Norden existiert.

VG Limes
Norbosm (2023-06-26 05:17:02+00:00): Danke für die Info
Grüße Norbert
jleedev (2023-06-13 01:14:57+00:00): These `name` tags are not really names and might be better in `description`, or simply omitted, e.g. ‘church parking loop’ is presumably not written on a street sign nor does it give any information that isn't self-evident.
jleedev (2023-06-13 01:19:27+00:00): The name of an object is inherently a proper name and is usually capitalized; if not then it might not actually be a name.
user_11497812 (2023-06-13 13:00:12+00:00): Thanks for the tips!
Stahlmann (2024-01-04 21:57:38+00:00): why did you remove the place:Erzhausen tag from the node of Erzhausen?
Stahlmann (2024-01-04 22:00:04+00:00): natürlich meine ich place:village ;)
F3P (2024-01-09 13:54:25+00:00): sorry that was a mistake. I edited a different Erzhausen near Frankfurt. Happened by accident. Thanks for noticing and fixing.
Stahlmann (2024-01-09 18:02:23+00:00): perfect! Thanks for the feedback!
Frans S (2023-06-16 11:32:34+00:00): Hello Again.
Your mappings here are rather precise, however not squared.  So Please square each rectangular building !
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137252475
literan (2023-06-13 19:50:30+00:00): да сколько же ты будешь в одну и ту же точку дубли кидать?
Adam Schneider (2023-11-29 06:22:03+00:00): That's a good solution. If trails are completely deleted, someone might re-add them. The "abandoned" prefix keeps it in the database but lets future mappers know that there's a reason it isn't showing up.
richlv (2025-01-10 09:13:03+00:00): Ha, labs - orto neredzot gandrīz nomainīju uz "demolished:" - labi, ka paskatījos rediģēšanas datumu :)
julcnx (2024-04-24 08:41:39+00:00): Hey, thank you for your contributions! I noticed you've marked some roads as 'living_street.' One tip for future edits: you should tag these as 'highway=residential' instead. This is because there aren't any rules in Thailand that specifically lower speed limits or give pedestrians priority in residential areas.
You can read more about this on the Thailand wiki. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Cheers, Julien
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Urban_and_Local_Road_wide_enough_for_motor_cars
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137253039
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-12 17:20:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8260229076
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10971549290

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
David L Poole (2024-05-20 22:17:31+00:00): Most of this path (the west2/3) doesn’t exist where it is marked. I live here, walk it regularly, and the actual path follows the river. I will make an edit; but I’m not sure whether to move it or create a new one and delete the old one.
limes11 (2023-06-12 21:26:16+00:00): Hi

da ist keine Baustelle mehr. War vor ein paar Tagen dort. Ich mache das wieder rückgängig.

VG
kuhni74 (2023-07-18 12:48:50+00:00): Vielen Dank für das Mapping des Schutzgebiets! Als Kategorie ist dzt. "4" eingetragen. Im LGBl. 73/2021 steht, dass "IUCN Ib" anzustreben sei. Heißt das, dass das Schutzgebiet von der IUCN noch nicht als "Ib" anerkannt ist und daher bis zur Anerkennung "IV" ist?
eriosw (2023-07-20 13:30:08+00:00): laut https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/datahub/datahubitem-view/f60cec02-6494-4d08-b12d-17a37012cb28

hat das Gebiet IUCN IV
kuhni74 (2023-07-20 13:38:34+00:00): Hmmm, interessant. Mittlerweile hab ich mit Christoph Leditznig korrespondiert, der mir versicherte, dass die Akkreditierung als 1b "knapp nach der Gebietsverordnung" erfolgte. Aber wer weiß, wann das Land Stmk die Daten zusammengestellt und nach Brüssel geschickt hat, diese Prozesse können manchmal langatmig sein.
kuhni74 (2023-07-20 13:51:57+00:00): Bin jetzt nicht sicher, ob ich Dich schon andernorts darauf aufmerksam gemacht hab, dass ich mir erlaubt habe, die Schutzgebiete als Relation zu fusionieren, bitte um kurze Kontrolle: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138714809 Ich fürchte aber, dass ich irgendwo was falsch gemacht hab, weil insbesondere die Grenze westlich von Hohem und Niederem Röcker wird jetzt nicht mehr gerendert. Falls ich alles zerschossen haben sollte (was ich nicht hoffe), bitte um Revert.
Friendly_Ghost (2023-06-13 00:13:42+00:00): Hello Asphodel,

Could you please write more informative changeset comments? Then other mappers can understand better what you are doing.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for the relevant guideline.

Regards,

Casper
user_6110846 (2023-06-14 03:02:09+00:00): it is not possible to change names from Ukrainian to Russian on the territory of Ukraine.
your edits have been cancelled
  In case of continuing to replace the Ukrainian language with Russian, a complaint will be sent to DWG
Friendly_Ghost (2023-06-14 10:02:21+00:00): @Poliakoff Have all relevant changesets been reverted? Asphodel made a lot of changesets like this one.
avinet_ua (2023-06-14 22:40:16+00:00): @Friendly_Ghost, seems like need to revert his changeset during last week, he changed a lot of data
user_6110846 (2023-06-15 05:24:52+00:00): @Friendly_Ghost avinet_ua canceled everything
Friendly_Ghost (2023-06-15 09:20:36+00:00): Thanks for the update
solenoid jam (2023-07-06 14:36:05+00:00): Hello. 
Could you please tell me what "denotation=e" means? What is the purpose of this designation?
SekeRob (2023-07-06 15:00:38+00:00): Hi,

Could not let you in on the little farmers secret so I changed it to agricultural. :O)))


Seriously, fat finger hit the wrong key and starting cloning an olive tree around the area, at least 99.9% of them are this species. Fortunately we have JOSM search and the data set was still on my drive, so fix is done.

ciao
Andrea Musuruane (2023-06-13 07:22:09+00:00): Ciao Michele, dov'e' il marciapiedi? Io vedo solo la pista ciclabile: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=881930399398473 Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137254677
mikki65 (2023-06-13 12:09:01+00:00): QUI

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=401290994672906&lat=45.36995015803&lng=8.1709828715271&z=17&focus=photo
Andrea Musuruane (2023-06-13 12:16:40+00:00): Quello e' un altro pezzo di Via Monte Bianco davanti ai civici 18-20. Tu hai modificato tra il 14 e il 2.
mikki65 (2023-06-13 12:40:36+00:00): io intendevo quel pezzo che non e ' segnato
lipuma (2023-06-13 12:32:40+00:00): Hi, this natural area has the tag `Bezeichnung=*'. Are you sure this is correct?
eriosw (2023-06-13 13:51:22+00:00): Danke - habe ich übersehen - ist korrigiert
SomeoneElse (2025-04-19 23:19:06+00:00): Hello,
I'm a bit confused by the change here.  Previously https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/881142231/history was an area runway and it didn't have a linear component.  The MR challenge said to add the linear runway and change the area to area:aeroway=runway, but you didn't do that - you removed the area tag, which meant that it's possible to misinterpret the runway as a linear circle.
Am I missing something here, or does the data need fixing here?
Best Regards,
Andy
Residentcl (2023-07-03 00:13:16+00:00): este cambio creo que esta mal hecho, 
este colegio cubre casi toda manzana  completa y no sólo este edificio
ToniE (2023-06-13 08:31:21+00:00): Servus,

müsste das in der Relation dann nicht ein route=tracks oder route=railway statt route=train sein.

route=train setzt sowas wie einen Fahrplan voraus, eine Zugnummer, ... Hier scheint es eine (ehemalige?) Eisenbahninfrastruktur (Gleise) zu sein, auf der kein Zug mehr fährt.

VG
Toni
Herrenälber (2023-06-13 20:09:10+00:00): Hi,
ja da hast du Recht route=tracks ist hier tatsächlich sinnvoller für die Relation. Danke - habe es geändert.
Sander H (2023-09-08 07:55:45+00:00): Hoi, weet je zeker dat er hier op de parkeerplaats midden in een woonwijk een autodealer zit?
aseidel (2023-06-13 10:16:08+00:00): Lieber Oedemer,
Glückwunsch zum ersten OSM-Edit!
Bitte beim Tagging für #LGMaps darauf achten, dass die Tags richtig gesetzt werden: class:bicycle:description=Wert-2 ist so nicht richtig. Lt. Schema müssten Sie hier auf eine +1 kommen; das Tagging lautet entsprechend class:bicycle=1. Mit class:bicycle:description=* können Sie eine kurze Notiz zur Begründung der Bewertung hinterlassen (z. B. class:bicycle:description=wenig befahrene Straße durch ruhiges Gewerbegebiet; Vorgehen bei Wert 0 siehe Ausfüllhilfe). Bitte außerdem ergänzen, ob der Abschnitt beleuchtet ist (lit= yes oder lit=no).
Vielen Dank fürs Beachten der Tipps!
Herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#LGMaps
lipuma (2023-06-13 14:05:27+00:00): Hi SekeRob,

What does the tag Torre=Ciarrapico mean?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1181444942
SekeRob (2023-06-13 14:29:54+00:00): Something just fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137289205
Name of a close by village that somehow landed in the copy-paste buffer when mapping a piece of farmland.

ciao
Taya_S (2023-06-12 18:36:20+00:00): Hallo Florislw

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Verder vroeg ik me ook af waarom je hier een stuk gras hebt verwijdert? Typisch verwijderen we niet zomaar dingen op de kaart, en ik kan niets op de satelliet beelden zien. 

Met vriendelijke groet,
Taya
Taya_S (2023-06-14 03:34:23+00:00): Ik heb deze changeset terug gedraait in 137308207
81miles (2023-06-12 18:48:21+00:00): Correzione, velocità a 50km/h per Strada Provinciale Pascolare.
WoodWoseWulf (2023-06-14 23:44:16+00:00): Hello!
This park already has a name:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/554170344#map=18/27.68273/-97.29488
On OSM, we typically map using the principle of "one feature on OSM element" so any corrections to the park's name should be applied to the existing park area rather than creating a new node.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
IreuN (2023-06-12 18:59:50+00:00): https://www.bip.um.sosnowiec.pl/a,534100,przedszkola.html
OldManCelli (2023-06-22 18:07:39+00:00): I changed the area that you mapped from a building to a "landuse=industrial". I hope that is cool. I also mapped the apparent two buildings in that area. Let me know if that was a mistake.
Tolstoi21 (2023-06-15 07:25:15+00:00): Hei, ajattelin laittaa näin kommentin kautta kiitokset sinulle tästä korjauksesta! Aluksi katsoin, että tässä olisi virhe, mutta OSMin building:part ja building:levels wikisivut tosiaan neuvovat nykyään laittamaan näiden osien alaiselle building-polygonille _korkeimman_ osan :levels-arvon (mikä tuntui aluksi minusta oudolta). Tämä konventio on jossain vaiheessa vuosien varrella muuttunut, tai sitten simple 3D-schema ei sitä ole koskaan suositellut. Mutta siis: kiitos korjauksestasi! Täytyy muistaa tämä uusi skeema kun korjailen jatkossa muita rakennuksia. Yst. Tolstoi21
Larmax (2023-06-15 08:01:12+00:00): Juu, ei mitään, itseäni lähinnä ärsyttää kun vanhalla tavalla piirretyt 3d-rakennukset leijuvat ilmassa esim. f4 tai streetsGL 3d-kartoissa. Enkä tainnut viitsiä kirjoittaa asiasta kommenttia :D
watmildon (2024-03-26 02:35:58+00:00): Hello! There's a few houses here with 2 addresses but they don't look like duplexes on aerial.. are they? There's also this oddity where 2 nodes have the same address... any ideas? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10971809178/history

Thanks for taking a look.