piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2023-02-27 20:48:58+00:00): Moin Wolfgang
Du hast hier, mit Sicherheit aus Versehen, den Knoten, wo "Aufm Feld" auf "Am Medebach" trifft auf die "Hochsauerlandstraße" gezogen. Da der von Dir genutzte Editor Punkte immer sofort an nahe gelegene Linien klebt (oder drauf schnappt) hat sich dadurch ein Problem ergeben, welches ich spontan nur durch komplette Umkehrung deiner Änderung lösen konnte. Sorry.
(siehe hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133103442).
Das Ortschild ist aber noch da, wo du es hin getan hast :)

Achte bitte immer darauf, wenn dir dein Editor Warnungen auswirft, wenn du Speichern willst. Manchmal ist es Quatsch, was da steht, aber manchmal ist es auch ganz hilfreich.

Cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133077026
gscholz (2023-02-28 07:22:59+00:00): Hi BigGino,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=17.28586&lat=40.64182&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133077121

This way also partially overlaps with an already existing way and is not connected at its ends. So it is not usable by routing software.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Max-Kritic (2023-04-27 05:45:32+00:00): Cette interdiction est encore de mise ?
ThomCJ (2023-04-27 09:27:25+00:00): Salut Max-Kritic, selon le site de la ville de Fécamp mis à jour le 6 avril 2023 : https://www.ville-fecamp.fr/actualites/profitez-de-la-beaute-de-nos-falaises-mais-a-distance-et-avec-prudence/ 
« De façon définitive, l’avenue des Peupliers et l’avenue du Bois-Rosé ont été fermées à 15 mètres du bord de falaise.

La route du Phare a été rouverte à la circulation, avec limitation du tonnage à 3.5 t et interdiction de stationner dans le virage.

L’accès aux piétons, sur une bande de 15 mètres depuis le bord de falaise est interdit depuis le parking du quai des Pilotes jusqu’au cap Fagnet. L’accès à la plage entre la jetée et le cap Fagnet reste interdit.

Le Belvédère situé en tête de falaise et le sentier sont interdits d’accès, tout comme les blockhaus, le temps de procéder à la sécurisation du site.

Dans cette optique, le parking du cap Fagnet demeure fermé. La Ville de Fécamp a procédé à des barriérages et a multiplié les messages à la prudence sur sites, indiquant la dangerosité des lieux. »
Max-Kritic (2023-04-27 16:47:26+00:00): Parfait. J'ai réouvert la véloroute et détourné le GR. J'y étais le jour avant l'effondrement.
ntzm (2023-10-10 13:53:59+00:00): Hi, is it still closed?
Max-Kritic (2023-10-11 04:23:03+00:00): Je pense
PT-53 (2023-02-27 12:18:46+00:00): Hallo  Franz-Peter Scherer,
Du hast hier einen Adress-Knoten gekapert. Besser wäre es gewesen einen neuen separaten POI-Knoten anzulegen.
Ich habe das für Dich verbessert.
Adress-Knoten:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3051798191/history
neuer POI-Knoten:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10696999473/history

Grüße aus dem Landkreis BC
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-04 11:23:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133285457 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unreliable name changes.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6912 and links from there
NastassiaKalesnikava (2023-02-27 09:14:46+00:00): Added speed limit 25 mph. Source - local traffic rules and user feedback. #mbx_editing
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133077777
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-04 11:23:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133285457 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unreliable name changes.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6912 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-04 11:23:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133285457 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unreliable name changes.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6912 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-04 11:23:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133285457 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unreliable name changes.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6912 and links from there
Langlaeufer (2023-02-27 09:48:40+00:00): sidewalk:right=no ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3374333
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133078680
Nadjita (2023-02-27 10:07:41+00:00): Sorry, ich war da hin- und hergerissen. Es ist einer dort, aber eben  nur 35cm breit. Erst hab ich no erfasst und hinterher einfach mit der Breite. Hab jetzt separate genommen, da er ja erfasst ist.
ivanbranco (2023-03-06 11:47:03+00:00): Ciao Marco,

per favore non duplicare il ref dei sentieri escursionistici nel name delle way (es. name=1).
marcobanal (2023-03-06 13:07:48+00:00): Va bene. Provvedo a eliminare
balchen (2023-03-19 20:41:09+00:00): Hei. Flott at Rogaland fylkeskommune oppdaterer OSM.

Gang- og sykkelvei vises helst med highway=cycleway + foot=designated.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-04 11:23:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133285457 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unreliable name changes.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6912 and links from there
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 12:37:30+00:00): And GOODBYE to ANYONE standing in JOHN CENA's way as he takes on SIX MEN in a STEEL CAGE CHUTES N' LADDERS MATCH at the WWE SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUPEEEEERRRRR SLLLLAAAAAAAAMMMMMM!!!
eggie (2023-02-27 11:04:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback parking:orientation heb ik aangepast naar orientation. Dat is onlangs veranderd in de wiki.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
habi (2023-02-27 10:15:13+00:00): Sorry für das grosse Changeset, da hat mir JOSM einen Streich gespielt...
AntMadeira (2023-02-27 18:15:04+00:00): Olá, meioserrano.

Só para avisar que a aldeia da Carvalha, que adicionaste neste conjunto de edições, já existia.

Abraço,
António.
meioserrano (2023-02-27 18:22:08+00:00): Okok, obrigado, vou tentar fazer aqui uma coisa como tenho feito antes, isto vai demorar e vai ser feito por várias passagens, até chegar a um certo nivel de detalhe.. e entretanto vou dando calinadas, corrigindo outras, etc.. )))
A seguir vou ter que corrigir algumas porque são hamlet, mas editar mapa sem referencias nenhumas é dificl , até faltam nomes  de localidades(pelo menos da forma como faço).
A propósito disso havia alguem que sabi afazer bem a passagem das toponimias a partir das bases de dados Dicofre ou assim.. eu nao sei, mas esta zona precisava de um avanço desse género.. abraço
AntMadeira (2023-02-27 19:19:29+00:00): Eu adicionei praticamente todas as aldeias de Alvaiázere, mas ainda não fui para Ferreira do Zêzere, portanto, é bem possível que faltem muitas dezenas de aldeias, tal como faltavam em Alvaiázere.
As vilas e cidades já estão todas mapeadas, mas boa sorte com as aldeias e lugares...
Normalmente, os municípios têm essa informação nos seus websites, mas Ferreira do Zêzere não parece ter.
Havia uma forma de obter os dados através daqui:
https://mapas.ine.pt/download/index2021.phtml

Mas só consigo os polígonos, já não vem com os nomes associados.
Aqui, consegues os nomes, mas sem polígonos.
https://smi.ine.pt/Categoria
Se conseguires fuçar aí e ver se sacas alguma coisa, depois diz alguma coisa.

Eu recorro muito aos mapas militares e, sempre que estão disponíveis, aos SIG dos municípios.


Força nesse mapeamento!
AntMadeira (2023-02-27 19:27:57+00:00): Ah, aqui tens acesso aos lugares principais, mas não a todos.
Não é muito fácil de ver, porque tens de andar de um em um, mas pode ajudar:
https://mapas.ine.pt/map.phtml
eggie (2023-02-27 11:07:04+00:00): Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side

orientation ipv parking:orientation. Kijk je nog even?

Mapse
eggie
pyrog (2023-03-12 09:31:49+00:00): Bonjour MaRo73-13

Pour info ta modification de la Route du Lac casse par erreur l'itinéraire de randonné https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13519312.

De plus le segment forme un triangle au lieu d'une simple ligne droite.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1108566676

Je corrige.
Bon dimanche

Yves
balint36 (2023-07-28 17:07:16+00:00): Jó, hogy be lett rakva egy határellenőrzési pont az ipolydamásdi Ipoly-hídra, de remélem tudod, hogy 2007 óta nincs határellenőrzés a két ország között, ezzel összhangban a hídon (a híd közepén) határellenőrzés ki se épült.
zsolt d (2023-07-28 21:49:49+00:00): Szervusz Bálint!
Jó bizony, mert ott van a határpont az úton. Nem is jó hogy valaki leszedte.
Jó bizony, mert elég sok országhatár / közút metszéspontban van tőlem függetlenül , magyar és szlovák szerkesztők által „border control” feltüntetve. Annak ellenére hogy az ideiglenes jellegű, kiépített vagy kiépítetlen. Nézz utána körbe az országhatárokon!
De remélem tudod, hogy az országhatárokon bármikor lehet határellenőrzés, és akkor bizony a határpontokon (határvonal/út metszéspontban), vagy az országhatár egyik oldalára települnek a határőrök/rendőrök. akkor is ha van kiépített őrház, és akkor is ha nincs. Itt nincs őrház, olyat be sem rajzoltam.
Remélem tudod, hogy az utóbbi években mind magyar, mind szlovák részről rendre voltak alkalmak, amikor a határellenőrzést – nem állandó jelleggel –visszaállították. 
Tehát ott van a helye a határnak, és a határellenőrzésnek. De nem állandóan üzemel. Remélem értékeled, hogy én csak követtem a korábban másutt alkalmazott megoldást.
Határpont ott bizony van, és van amikor üzemel, többnyire nem.
balint36 (2023-07-29 09:38:21+00:00): Már megint kútfőből találsz ki szabályokat. Sehol sem látom leírva, hogy ez így van, csak te állítod te most itt.
Ha elfogadjuk a magyarázatodat, akkor sem a híd közepén random pozícióban van a helye.
De nem fogadjuk el a magyarázatodat, mert az OSM wiki egyértelműen fogalmaz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dborder_control
"Tag the place where border control actually takes place, not the border itself."
Attól még hogy más helyeken helytelenül van használva, nem jelenti azt, hogy az ilyen használat helyes. Érdemes lenne olvasgatni az OSM wikit, mert korábban is volt, hogy saját szájízed szerint kezdtél el címkézni (és akkor még a Hungária EC teljes vonalát is törölted).
zorglubu (2023-03-02 11:02:51+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez ajouté un nœud O'fun Park à l'intérieur d'un contour déjà existant, décrivant l'emprise de ce parc, et portant les mêmes informations à peu de choses près.
Il est préférable de supprimer ce nœud en doublon et de mettre éventuellement à jour l'objet existant. Merci.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2023-03-02 11:11:13+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour votre alerte
Effectivement, il existe bien un way.
Nous avons donc supprime le node en doublon

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-27 12:48:58+00:00): Hello! Note that we mark buildings as buildings, and marking entire town as a building is not needed.

I hope that next edits will go better.
Falsernet (2024-06-12 20:50:58+00:00): Painted mini roundabouts should be mapped using a highway=mini_roundabout node and not a circular way. Additionally, all roundabout ways should be tagged junction=roundabout and not oneway=yes.
deepikja (2024-07-02 09:49:24+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for providing feedback on our edits and making the necessary corrections. Apologies for the delay in responding to your comment; we were unable to retrieve the feedback shared by the community users owing to a technical issue. 
We acknowledge that this is an editor error. Based on ground reality, the correct mapping would be to tag the node #1032885242 with highway=mini_roundabout and junction=roundabout for way # 261284234. 
We have trained the editors on the SOP to adhere to when contributing to OSM and provided them with feedback on wrong edits to avoid them from making incomplete edits in the future.

Regards,
Deepikja
bxl-forever (2023-02-27 12:30:17+00:00): @Mon Agence,

I am afraid to tell you that your change is incorrect.

Several of us have tried to contact you in the last months to explain the mistakes you are doing when editing the map.  Your customers pay you to get their companies on the map.  Fine!  But to make it right, you should not just add company names to buildings.  Sometimes, they should be added as single nodes inside buildings, and most importantly if it is a shop it must be properly tagged… as a shop.

Again, changeset titles is not the place for promotional messages about your customers.  As I tried to instruct you in a former comment, spamming the OSM database won’t improve your rankings anywhere.

I fixed your edit.

Please be kind enough to read messages emailed to you, through changeset comments or direct messages.
eggie (2023-02-27 11:19:50+00:00): Dag OSB

Je vraagt feedback... name=Historische Grenspaal  kun je beter omzetten naar description. Nooit name gebruiken om iets te beschrijven.
bv name=bankje name=huis name=fietspad name=boom.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-27 11:28:32+00:00): https://www.grenspalenrevue.nl/grens-gelre-kleef

en
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dboundary_stone

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2023-02-27 11:38:08+00:00): De tagging en de juiste plaats heb ik aangepast volgens bovenstaande.
MVG
eggie
marczoutendijk (2023-03-04 19:03:18+00:00): Het gebruik van OSM voor het testen van software wordt als onfatsoenlijk en onnodig beschouwd.
Wilkt u voortaan onze testserver gebruiken?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-04 11:23:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133285457 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unreliable name changes.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6912 and links from there
Tatti Barletta (2023-02-28 07:19:31+00:00): Forse non ho capito cosa volevi fare, ma quella *è* l'uscita 21 della tangenziale (non autostrada). È lo stesso modo in cui si presentano anche le uscite 20, 22 e 25.
Tatti Barletta (2023-03-02 07:18:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133198896
JasonBob (2023-02-28 17:32:16+00:00): Do you have a source for the name of this stream? Is it named or did you give it a name based on a nearby road? If the latter I think the name should be deleted to keep with matching reality
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-27 11:30:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Wartość addr:city jest niezgodna z addr:place. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, usuń addr:place i zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, pozostaw tylko addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/670567712

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Aleksander | Yanosik (2023-02-28 14:45:59+00:00): Dziękuję za wskazanie obiektów do poprawy. Korekty zostały przeze mnie naniesione.
Pozdrawiam
NorthCrab (2023-03-01 08:06:13+00:00): 👍
JasonBob (2023-02-28 17:23:42+00:00): It appears you have created a named truck trail here, but aerial and street imagery only appear to show a foot trail with a single locked removable bollard for what I assume are City vehicles. Also, the trail you added continues all the way across the River, and you placed a bridge despite your description stating that there is no bridge.
eggie (2023-02-27 11:59:02+00:00): Tip  de key parking:orientation is onlangs aangepast naar orientation
Zie wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side

Denk dat de editor nog niet is aangepast.
groet
eggie
DutchJackal (2023-02-27 12:05:36+00:00): Ik ben inderdaad gewoon de standaard velden in de browser aan het vullen. :-)
eggie (2023-02-27 12:18:38+00:00): Mocht je een beter editor willen proberen kijk dan eens naar JOSM.
aanrader.... De ervaren mappers gebruiken bijna  allemaal josm. 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
LockOnGuy (2023-02-27 19:26:12+00:00): Hello Eslam_Elsayed, may I know what did you edit here?    
All I can see is you split a way for 2 sections for no reason. May i know why? 
Regards..
Eslam_Elsayed (2023-02-28 07:29:56+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy;
Thank you for noticing that, I only updated this street to make it bi-direction because it was connected with some streets it was under construction and I saw you update this street as your local knowledge in this located in this changeset:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133101244
Thank you for your understanding.
Regards
Eslam_Elsayed
reigi (2023-02-28 06:06:46+00:00): Hallo Jonathan, die Änderungen, die du vorgenommen hast finde ich dem Grunde nach richtig und nachvollziehbar. Highway=footway bedingt aber (zumindest in D) lt. wiki in den meisten Fällen ein entsprechendes Schild https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=footway. Wenn keines vorhanden ist, wäre highway=path korrekt. Und für ein bicycle=no sollte ebenfalls eine entsprechende Beschilderung vorhanden sein. Das könnte z.B. ein Gehweg-Schild sein. Ansonsten wäre kein bicycle=no angebracht.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133083893
Jonathan Haas (2023-02-28 06:30:59+00:00): Das bicycle=no habe ich nur gesetzt weil es vorher durch access=no impliziert war und ich mir nicht mehr ganz sicher war, ob Radfahren da nicht irgendwo doch veboten war. Das kann ich gerne wieder entfernen. (Radfahren macht in jedem Fall dort allerdings wenig Sinn, da am oberen Ende weder über die Brücke noch über die Treppe physisch sinnvoll gefahren werden kann, ein Radfahrer der zu Saint Gobain will, wird vermutlich über die Glasstraße fahren.
reigi (2023-02-28 08:38:56+00:00): kommst du denn über die Brücke auf der Eygelshovener Str. aus? Warum kannst du nicht über die Brücke fahren? Notfalls könnte man dort auch das Fahrrad schieben. Ebenso absteigen und schieben über die Treppe, oder? Fährt die Treppe vom Pfad aus gesehen aufwärts? Dann sollte man die Treppe noch mit incline=up versehen.
Jonathan Haas (2023-02-28 08:49:47+00:00): Die Brücke ist ziemlich schmal und höher als der umliegende Weg, fahren wäre eher gewagt, man könnte notfalls drüber schieben oder das Rad tragen, macht aber wenig Spaß.
Jonathan Haas (2023-02-28 08:56:41+00:00): Ich habe das ganze nochmal überarbeitet, werde da aber in nächster Zeit nicht mehr vor Ort sein.
reigi (2023-02-28 16:53:32+00:00): Danke, ich schau es mir gleich mal in der Theorie an und wenn ich mal dort bin natürlich auch in der Praxis :-).
verttte (2023-03-02 07:42:19+00:00): Здравствуйте. Похоже, что мы перемапливаем друг за другом. Хочу прояснить некоторые моменты. Для обозначений зданий есть тег "building=", для детсада "building=kindergarten". В вашем случае значится"amenity=kindergarten", этим тегом обозначают территорию. Затем, название детсада я в своей правке вынес в отдельную точку. Потому что организаций в зданиях может быть несколько и точками помечать их целесообразнее. В данном случае, конечно, организация одна, но есть ещё один недостаток подписи в самом здании - на рендере пропадает номер дома, заменяется на имя. Поэтому предлагаю убрать название детсада из имени здания, оставить на точке, и само здание исправить с amenity на building.
verttte (2023-03-13 11:55:12+00:00): Раз вы не отвечаете ни на комментарий, ни в личных сообщениях, то я вношу правки на своё усмотрение.
Dodko (2023-02-28 15:33:31+00:00): Adresa sa nevyplňuje do bodu POI ak už existuje na budove.
Je to funkčné? Na webe https://ivak.sk hladajú nájomcu
Potom treba pridať otváracie hodiny a kontakt.
ivanatora (2023-02-27 13:10:34+00:00): Здравей,
Каква съществуваща логика се спазва в този случай, че нещо ми убягва?
До сега сме тагвали междуградските пътища от републиканската пътна мрежа спрямо класът им в РПМ. 
Т.е. път 64 е второкласен и би следвало да е highway=secondary.

Поздрави,
Иван.
Boyko Botev (2023-02-27 17:56:17+00:00): Здравейте,
Съседния изход от града (Голямоконарско шосе) не е от първокласната пътна мрежа, но е от този тип. Друг пример е Асеновградско шосе; бул. Източен; бул. Христо Ботев. Може би дефинициите са различни в рамките на града и извън него?
Boyko Botev (2023-02-27 18:04:39+00:00): Може би в извън-градската му част трябва да е трънк, там където е двулентов, по примера на Асеновградко..?
ivanatora (2023-02-28 06:20:24+00:00): Здравей,

Мда, за градските части май нямаме установени правила за схемата на тагване и там се тагва малко субективно.

Ориентировъчно може да погледнеш:
1. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bg:WikiProject_Bulgaria/%D0%9F%D1%8A%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BC%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B6%D0%B0
2. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Bulgaria

highway=trunk по общоприетите конвенции на OSM се слага за скоростни пътища, каквито нямаме в България. Повечето колеги се отнасят малко либерално към този таг и го прилагат за големи междуградски пътища. За мен лично абсолютният минимум за trunk е да няма пътни възли с пресичане на трафика. Не съм много съгласен с тагването на Асеновградско заради кръговите - ако бяха възли на две нива без да се спира транзитния трафик, по би ми приличало на trunk.

Ти от Пловдив ли си?

Поздрави,
Иван
Boyko Botev (2023-03-01 13:29:56+00:00): От Пловдив съм да.. Ти?
Видях ги линковете- няма специфично за града. Мисля като ми остане време да ги маркирам булевардите по следната логика: 1) две ленти в посока - жълто; 2) три и повече ленти в посока - оранжево. 
Иначе за трънк-овете съм съгласен, обаче на това нямане, ако ги махнем и тези :)
ivanatora (2023-03-01 14:02:49+00:00): И аз съм от Пловдив. Обикалям с колелото - комбинацията от GPX следи и камера вършат добра работа за мапване.

На мен лично не ми допада идеята за ре-тагване на булеварди. Всеки си има в главата някаква схема. Но когато се случат двама или трима на едно място и почва едно постоянно ръчкане напред-назад с тези улици. Един ги иска primary, друг ги иска secondary, всеки си има някаква негова логика и си дърпа по неговия начин. Почва се с конфликти, става хаос и т.н.

За указване броя на ленти може да видиш това: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes Тези фийчъри се взимат предвид от навигационните софтуери, така че - полезни са.
Dimitar155 (2024-09-18 15:34:46+00:00): @Boyko Botev,

Класификацията на даден път не се определя от физически атрибути като брой на лентите, вид на настилката, равност (или неравност) и т.н., а според йерархичната им важност за региона/населеното място. Например югозападната дъга на софийското околовръстно има две ленти в по-голямата си част, но въпреки това е тагнат като highway=trunk поради факта че е силно натоварен и е единствената връзка между западните и южните квартали, без да се минава през центъра.

Ако се върнем обратно в Пловдив, тази част на Цар Борис III Обединител (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/42.161912/24.746447) не би следвало да е primary, тъй като въпросния основен път не продължава в северна посока. Логично е да бъде secondary.

бул. Никола Вапцаров е в същата ситуация. Отклонява се от главен път и се "забива" в индустриална зона и четирилентов павиран път (предполагам че това е бил стария път за Асеновград).

бул. Свобода и Перущица също са четирилентови улици, но изглежда че са важни за локалния трафик, но не и за транзитния и би трябвало да отидат едно ниво надолу.
JasonBob (2023-02-27 17:46:36+00:00): What is the purpose of renaming this park to Granada Square? I have requested proof of this name multiple times and haven't found anything supporting it.
eggie (2023-02-27 12:22:28+00:00): Lijkt me oke...  Scholen kan op meer manieren.
Vaak worden ook de adresnodes gebruikt ipv het vlak omdat er soms meer scholen in één gebouw zitten.
De nieuwste ontwikkeling is landuse=education op het vlak.
Maar helaas rendert dat nog niet. 

Maar zo is het ook correct. 

MVG
eggie