piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eserte (2024-11-25 07:04:53+00:00): Hi! Die Gothaer Straße ist hier nun mit highway=road getaggt. Sollte es nicht tertiary sein, wie in den restlichen Abschnitten der Straße?
citrula (2024-11-23 22:23:36+00:00): If these are trails, please take a look at the wiki for highway=path tagging. You can respond to changeset comments by clicking the link in your email, or looking at the changesets on your profile.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-23 10:26:20+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12367378229/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Bern Hard (2025-04-23 10:56:11+00:00): es ist eine e-Ladesäule für E-Autos.
It is an e-charging station for e-cars.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-24 02:55:18+00:00): Would it be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station ?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
Bern Hard (2025-04-24 15:55:23+00:00): Beschreibung
Ladestation für Elektrofahrzeuge. Beschreibung auf dieser Wikiseite bearbeiten Beschreibung im zugehörigen Datenelement bearbeiten
Darstellung in OSM Carto
Charging station.16.svg
eggie (2024-11-23 11:13:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Wanneer aangegeven staat dat vrachtwagens alleen als bestemmingsverkeer zijn toegelaten is het correct.
Is er een algemeen vrachtwagenverbod dat is de tag hgv=no

oneway=no wordt niet getagd op reguliere wegen. Dat is default.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Fraxi (2024-11-23 11:18:58+00:00): Здравейте! Благодаря за актуализациите! В случая за трафопоста не е нужно да се поставя описателно име, тагът "power=substation" е достатъчен. Ето тук може да видите повече по въпроса:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
dcapillae (2024-11-23 16:05:43+00:00): Buenos tardes.

Este conjunto de cambios fue revertido. Cada contenedor se destina a un tipo de residuo diferente, no se deben mezclar.

Contenedor azul (papel y cartón):
recycling:paper=yes
recycling:magazines=yes
recycling:cardboard=yes
recycling:newspaper=yes
recycling:paper_packaging=yes

Contenedor amarillo (latas, envases y botellas de plástico):
recycling:plastic_packaging=yes
recycling:plastic_bottles=yes
recycling:cans=yes

Contenedor verde (botellas de cristal):
recycling:glass_bottles=yes

Hay que fijarse bien si no hay ya un contenedor en el mapa para el tipo de residuo que deseamos añadir. Por ejemplo, en este conjunto de cambios se ha añadido un contenedor de reciclaje de aceite que ya estaba en el mapa. Normalmente suelen estar cerca unos de otros situarse juntos.

Respecto a los contenedores marrones (residuos orgánicos), dado que también aceptan restos vegetales (flores u hojarasca) sería más conveniente etiquetarlos como «recycling:organic=yes». Se ha mantenido el que se ha añadido en este conjunto de cambios, si bien hay que añadirlos al mapa como un nodo independiente para no mezclar tipos de residuos diferentes en un mismo contenedor: un contenedor --> un nodo.

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
mavl (2024-11-23 12:42:11+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет непрямоугольные здания. Например:    
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1337111630  
  
Непрямоугольное здание - редкость. В редакторе iD (которым вы пользовались) есть команда "Сделать углы прямыми".
Jaroslav0803 (2024-11-23 13:39:01+00:00): Спасибо!
KarlaIbrahić (2024-11-23 11:41:50+00:00): Reverted because node was created. #OptimoRoute
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159495206
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159494614
Langlaeufer (2024-11-23 17:59:35+00:00): Hallo Andre,
ich habe den access des Weges auf motor_vehicle=agricultural;forestry korrgiert.
Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159495484
Langlaeufer (2024-11-23 17:30:22+00:00): Hi Max, the tags you have set are contradictory. compacted vs. segregated, width=0. Can you describe what the path looks like so I can help you with tagging.
Langlaeufer (2024-11-23 18:02:15+00:00): Ich habe es erstmal auf einen einfachen verdichteten Mehrzweckweg  geändert. Ich nehme mal an, da stehen keine Verkehrsschilder.
Javierpf (2024-11-26 19:02:34+00:00): Hi and thank you for contributing :-). Your changeset crosses many regions. 
Please for the future retain your changeset smaller (local). Let reviewers and other mappers check your edit more easily. It's impossible (almost) to keep track of the database and changes if changes in huge areas.
So I kindly ask you when you edit, retain your changeset in a particular smaller area -such as provinces/towns- save it first and then move to another area. Examples:
you are adding/modifying 10 objects in 2 distant cities => make 2 changesets, 1 per city.
you are adding/modifying 5 objects in 5 countries => make 5 changesets, 1 per country.
Why? Have a look at this wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Alx303 (2024-12-30 18:05:54+00:00): Thanks for the hint, will do it in the future.
pwbriggs (2025-04-13 21:13:23+00:00): Hey there,

I'm not an expert, but shouldn't these driveways be connected to the buildings & the sidewalks they cross?

Thanks
ChrissW-R1 (2025-01-05 14:05:13+00:00): Please check the discussion at https://osm.org/changeset/144241163
MaliMrav (2024-11-24 07:07:41+00:00): Please add meaningfull comments to your changesets (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments).
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 01:19:28+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164876683
Dawid2849 (2024-11-23 13:41:45+00:00): Te węzły są w budowie, więc nie oznaczamy ich jako istniejące. Poprzednie oznaczenie highway=construction + construction=motorway_junction było poprawne. Edycja wycofana
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-02 07:12:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4738001 - something went wrong with ele tag
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-02 07:12:24+00:00): also at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4738002
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-06 11:32:54+00:00): and https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4745101

can you take a look at peaks you edited here in general?
ChrissW-R1 (2025-01-05 14:00:13+00:00): Please check the discussion at https://osm.org/changeset/144241163
pbnoxious (2024-11-25 07:25:40+00:00): Hi, die Hausnummer 8 ist auch schon auf dem angrenzenden Gebäude eingetragen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/126562165

Ist das hier dann 8a oder eher nur Garagen oder ein sonstiger Anbau ohne Hausnummer?
WernerDerFranke (2024-11-25 08:35:45+00:00): Witzigerweise hängt die Hausnummer 8 genau am Eingang dieses Anbaus. Am Haupthaus/Eingang steht nichts. Insoweit für mich ein zusammenhängendes Gebäude mit Nr 8. StreetComplete bietet da keine Möglichkeit das quasi zu integrieren, was m.E. richtig wäre. Da ich so etwas noch nicht gemacht habe wollte ich mir das und die Änderungsoptionen mal zu Hause am PC im OSM anschauen. Ggf bist du da routinierter.
VG Werner
pbnoxious (2024-11-25 08:43:26+00:00): Hab die Gebäude mal zusammengeführt, melde dich falls es so nicht passt.
Enock4seth (2024-11-23 14:15:25+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You  have added "Voradep Road" to existing road name "SSNIT Road", is this the new name? And alternative name or which? Kindly clarify or fix.
Enock4seth (2024-11-23 14:10:16+00:00): Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap, kindly use title case for names eg. Galave Street instead of GBALEVE STREET.

Also kindly don't select tags in StreetComplete if you are not sure about what they mean. 

Please don't assume names too if you are not sure about the names and can't see it on street signs, etc.
SomeoneElse (2024-11-24 12:05:31+00:00): Hello,
We don't generally add the name of relations that something is part of to the something itself, so for example here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1315609958/history would only be called that if that was the name of this stretch of path on the ground.
Different maps show different things, and if one wants to show running route relations it can.
There are quite a few of these - see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1UCF - maybe have a look at some of those have been mapped?
Best Regards,
Andy


https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18046447
felipeeugenio (2024-11-23 12:28:19+00:00): Id	Contributor	Tmstmp UTC	Action	Comment
4526716	felipeeugenio	2024-11-23 13:21	closed	ok
4526696	felipeeugenio	2024-11-23 13:21	closed	ok
4526656	felipeeugenio	2024-11-23 13:21	closed	ok
4526663	felipeeugenio	2024-11-23 13:21	closed	ok
4526697	felipeeugenio	2024-11-23 13:21	closed	ok
4526664	felipeeugenio	2024-11-23 13:21	closed	ok
4526988	felipeeugenio	2024-11-23 13:21	closed	ok
4526692	felipeeugenio	2024-11-23 13:21	closed	ok
4526982	felipeeugenio	2024-11-23 13:21	closed	ok
4526659	felipeeugenio	2024-11-23 13:21	closed	ok
4526660	felipeeugenio	2024-11-23 13:21	closed	ok
4526997	felipeeugenio	2024-11-23 13:21	closed	ok
4526977	felipeeugenio	2024-11-23 13:21	closed	ok
4526984	felipeeugenio	2024-11-23 13:21	closed	ok
4526654	felipeeugenio	2024-11-23 13:21	closed	ok
4526998	felipeeugenio	2024-11-23 13:21	closed	ok
4526979	felipeeugenio	2024-11-23 13:21	closed	ok
4526662	felipeeugenio	2024-11-23 13:21	closed	ok
eggie (2024-11-23 14:51:43+00:00): Dag Stefan,

De accesstagging klopt niet voor een fietspad. 
Staat er werkelijk nog een C12 bord.
Ruiters zijn bv niet toegestaan op een fietspad.
mptor_vehicle=no Dat houdt ook moped en mofa tegen. 
bicycle=yes hoort niet op een fietspad. 

Welk bord staat hier vooraan?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=159497663

Tags die op een fietspad horen: G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway


MVG
eggie
StefanP91 (2025-01-12 13:26:05+00:00): Dag Eggie,

Dit stukje weg is in 2024 geasfalteerd in het kader van de "Parkstadroute"; een fietstracé dat door de hele regio loopt. Misschien ben ik wat voorbarig geweest om dit te wijzigingen naar een fietspad. Er staat volgens mij een C1 bord met daarbij 2 borden dat fietsers en tractoren toegestaan zijn. Er ligt thans ook een tractorsluis op het pad.
eggie (2025-01-12 13:43:56+00:00): Oke... Een C1 bord

De tagging is dan 
vehicle=no
horse=no
traffic_sign=NL:C1
Kennelijk is er dan een uitzondering voor fietsers middels een onderbord.
Dan dus bicycle=yes bijtaggen.

Wellicht is er ook een uitzondering voor motorvoertuigen/landbouwverkeer/aanwonenden.
Dan wordt het weer een beetje anders.

Iets om even uit te zoeken.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-01-12 13:53:45+00:00): Nog wat leesvoer
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dsump_buster

en

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden&direction=next&oldid=984258#C:_Geslotenverklaring
Enock4seth (2024-11-23 14:07:54+00:00): Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap, kindly use title case for names eg. Galave Street instead of GBALEVE STREET.

Also kindly don't select tags in StreetComplete if you are not sure about what they mean. eg. surface=sett https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=sett

Please don't assume names too if you are not sure about the names and can't see it on street signs, etc.
gurglypipe (2024-11-23 14:03:25+00:00): If you disagree with my edits, please engage in discussion about them, as I have been trying to do with you:
 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159067050
 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159073174

Calling them ‘vandalism’ is, I think, attributing malice to me where there is none.

As I put in the changeset comment for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159358834, I removed these speed limits to prompt a re-survey, because I believe you did not survey this speed limit, and the limit looks potentially incorrect (all other nearby residential roads are 20mph).

If you can show you’ve surveyed it (a recent photo of the entrance to the road where a speed limit sign would be would suffice), then that would be great.

As it is, you’ve been making mass edits (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159058612, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159067914, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159497487, etc.) without providing any sources for your data.

This has resulted in several demonstrably wrong speed limits or access tagging (fixes for them in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159320399, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159237475, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159072623, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158966610).
Having incorrect data like this in the OSM database is worse than having no data, as fewer people will question data which is present vs data which is missing. Missing data prompts people to survey it using tools like StreetComplete. Resurveying existing data is less common.

As someone with over 8000 edits to their name, I would hope you’d picked up best practices like providing sources and writing relevant changeset comments by now. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments)

Please start to provide sources for your data, and engage in discussion with the rest of the community you’re participating in. If you have a disagreement about my edits, raise it with me — or if you don’t want to do that, then raise it with the Data Working Group (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group).
If you continue to make mass edits, without providing sources, around the area of the north west which I am familiar with, I will be reporting your edits to the DWG, as I have lost trust in your sourcing for them. In that case, some form of mediation and escalation from them might be necessary.
edvac (2024-11-23 21:12:11+00:00): Dear user Hwerhwette, please use human-readable messages in your changeset comments. "#hotosm-project-15239 #firewater #malenymaps #DRR " is not sufficient. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for an explanation why this is important.
Hwerhwette (2024-11-24 04:49:16+00:00): Thank you for letting me know, edvac. I will be sure to add proper changeset comments from now on.
papaj (2025-01-09 12:44:46+00:00): Is there a reason you have added '(site of)' to these industrial areas? The name has been added to industrial areas for the business name. so '(site of') is redundant.
felipeeugenio (2024-11-23 13:43:41+00:00): Hola Nicolás.
Gracias por sus ediciones. Se ve que conoce el lugar.
Para los nombres de los edificios, está bien usar el nombre oficial. Sin embargo hay que evitar usar descripciones. esos paréntesis dan la idea de eso. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names)

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159498655
Znaika (2024-11-24 13:26:06+00:00): Hallo RobotFK,
das ist falsch. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/782987030/history
Studio 86 ist hier.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/782986056
Ich werde es zurück ändern.
Gruß,
Znaika
RobotFK (2024-11-24 15:32:50+00:00): Hallo Znaika,

Ich hatte das Frauenzauber geschäft nicht gesehen.

Danke für das Korrigieren

Grüße 
RobotFK
Edelsalami (2025-06-05 18:17:35+00:00): Hi Claudius, "Heizkraftwerk" ist kein gültiger Name für das BHKW. Wolltest du das ggf als description taggen? Gruß
Claudius Henrichs (2025-12-31 22:36:02+00:00): Hm... Ich versuche gerade mich zu erinnern, woher ich das damals hatte. Ich glaube, dass ich das von einem anderen Objekt rüberkopiert hatte. Kann es jetzt aber auch nicht mehr nachvollziehen. Danke fürs aufräumen ins description-Tag.
felipeeugenio (2024-11-23 13:44:39+00:00): Hola. Este es un ejemplo de nombre descriptivo.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159498998
Mladen Petrovic (2026-04-08 23:21:51+00:00): Ove RGZ adrese nisu dobre, prepisale su stare postojeće adrese, umesto broja 15 stoji 56. 15 je ispravno na objektu i u apr-u. addr:housenumber treba da ostane 15 a verovatno je potreban drugi tag za ove RGZ adrese.
Branko Kokanovic (2026-04-09 07:43:04+00:00): Izvini, ne znam na koju ulicu misliš? Naravno da RGZ nije svemoguć, mi ga osvežavamo svakih mesec-dva dana i primetim da ponekad isprave stvari. U situacijama gde se RGZ i lokalno znanje (tvoje:) ne slažu, ti uvek imaš prednost! Ja bih svakako ostavio i RGZ adresu (često se desi da ona stvarno postoji, da je ima u ličnim kartama, a da APR kasni sa osvežavanjem i da ima starih tabli).

Inače, imamo portal DINA gde možeš da vidiš sve adrese iz RGZ-a i da li su i kako povezane sa OSM-om: https://dina.openstreetmap.rs (pa idi "Adrese", pa nađi "Negotin").

Hvala što si se javio, slobodno dodaj šta treba i pitaj šta god treba!
Mladen Petrovic (2026-07-16 13:29:43+00:00): Nisam previše radio izmena na OSM pa ne znam kako bi ovo trebalo da se popravi? 
Koliko razumem ovi RGZ podaci koji su unešeni za celu zemlju su prepisali više postojećih ulica sa kompletno pogrešnim brojevima. Da li može nekako da se izaberu stari brojevi za te ulice koje su pogrešne?

U ovom slučaju 56 umesto 15 su bukvalno okrenuli odakle počinje ulica, zato je tolika razlika.
Branko Kokanovic (2026-07-20 17:18:55+00:00): slobodno izmeni brojeve kako misliš. Idealno bi bilo i da prekopiraš "ref:RS:kucni_broj" tag, tako da ostane vezano i za RGZ (i da znamo da postoji greška). Klikni "edit" i izmeni jedan-dva broja, pa se javi ovde (ili na telegram kanal sa ostatkom zajednice), pa ću bacim pogled, da vidim jel sve radiš ok.

Inače, ne znam da li mogu da se izaberu stari brojevi jer ih (pretpostavljam) nije bilo. Da ih je bilo, import ne bi uništavao postojeće adrese (mi smo uglavnom dodavali samo tamo gde fali)
felipeeugenio (2024-11-23 13:49:38+00:00): Hola. Los condominios no son barrios.
Se dibujan como landuse=residential con el nombre.
Son conceptos distintos
Saludos
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 04:20:40+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164574226
rohieb (2024-12-01 21:19:19+00:00): Das am ZOB hat vermutlich damit zugemacht? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1287971798
‎lollipop (2024-12-13 19:28:13+00:00): Ja, der Container ist mittlerweile auch verschwunden.
rohieb (2025-03-13 09:53:07+00:00): Danke. Hab ihn dann jetzt auch mal von der Karte weggeräumt :)
HellMap (2024-11-24 11:11:02+00:00): Kādēļ izdzēsta teritorija https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1289865719/history ?
Enock4seth (2024-11-23 15:55:26+00:00): Are these names of the houses publicly visible? Private information is not to be added to OpenStreetMap if these names are owners information that are not publicly available and verifiable. 

Also avoid using ALLCAPS for names, I have left similar comments on of  your changesets.
Adava Pays d'Aix (2024-11-26 16:13:27+00:00): Bonjour,
Il y a 3 arceaux ici. Etant donné que c'est pour des vélos et non pour des 2RM, un vélo accroché de chaque coté de l'arceau, ça fait 6 places disponibles et non 4.
Adava Pays d'Aix (2024-11-26 16:14:03+00:00): Ou alors on note uniquement le nombre d'arceaux et non le nombre d'emplacement, comme ça on se pose plus la question si c'est un petit vélo ou un vélo cargo qui va prendre la place de 2 ?
neluj (2024-12-01 20:01:49+00:00): Bonjour Adava
En effet, il y a bien 3 arceaux, j'ai indiqué 4 places car il me semble trop rapproché pour mettre deux vélo entre eux, que en pense tu ?
En effet, la solution de noté seulement le N° d'arceaux régle la question. Cela me va.
Bonne semaine
Enock4seth (2024-11-23 15:52:35+00:00): Hi, I have left a comment on one of your changesets that I have fixed. Can you look at it and fix the items in this and other changesets of yours, here  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159505265
canfe (2026-04-22 09:59:33+00:00): Ma cosa vuol dire che il cinema ha un level 0,1??
La wiki dice incrementi interi.
matteop3_ (2026-04-23 09:26:53+00:00): Non significa "zero virgola uno", ma "zero e uno", dato che il cinema occupa il piano terra e il primo piano. L'ingresso è effettivamente al piano terra, per cui si può valutare se lasciare solo il piano zero, non sono sicuro al 100% di come dovrebbe intendersi, ma per me è corretto "zero e uno".
canfe (2026-04-24 06:49:04+00:00): Capito.
Allora ci vuole il segno meno, come da wiki.
Ho corretto.
FroschForscher (2025-01-19 13:40:36+00:00): Hallo wambacher, du hattest hier an einer Addresse (Gebäude und Knoten) aus `addr:city=Elchingen` `addr:city=Neu-Ulm` gemacht:
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1336883153 . Fährenweg 5 in 89233 Neu-Ulm gibt es  bereits dort: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118794909 . Da das hier innerhalb von Elchingen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/941078) liegt, bin ich mir nicht sicher ob das stimmt.
welzheimerwald (2025-02-18 02:33:50+00:00): Typischer Boundary-Zerschnippel-Edit von ortsunkundigem Mapper, weil es mal wieder eine Meldung auf der Postcode-Map gab... :(
Enock4seth (2024-11-23 15:48:46+00:00): Hi and Welcome to OpemStreetMap. Please kindly use title case for names i.e. `Duase MA Primary` instead of ALLCAPS `DUASE MA PRIMARY`, I have fixed this now. 

Do not use descriptions for names eg. naming trees as Mango Tree, Coconut Tree, etc.  I have updated this see the tags used at https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/12367794437
Enock4seth (2024-11-23 15:50:25+00:00): Also use a good changeset comment to describe what you have mapped. Using only series of hashtags are not useful and helpful to yourself and other mappers. See why Good changeset comments are useful https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
george1201 (2024-12-03 10:50:08+00:00): Hallo bios,
da warst du zu voreilig. Noch gibt es die DPD-Paketannahme im Adler. Ich habe dort an der Kasse nachgefragt. Bis zum Ende des Jahres kann man seine Pakete noch abgeben. Im neuen Jahr muss man dann nochmal prüfen.
george1201 (2025-03-26 23:23:56+00:00): Habe ich gemacht. Ist erledigt.
desertivy (2024-11-23 15:14:08+00:00): street name*
Mashin (2024-11-25 19:45:27+00:00): Hi,
here just be a bit careful, because the gnis:feature_id and wikidata tags were not moved. 
I re-added them to the whole grounds.
Cheers
youbab (2024-11-24 21:10:29+00:00): Bonjour 
Veuillez vérifier votre changeset. Vous avez créé des doublons.
Merci
silversurfer83 (2024-11-23 20:38:11+00:00): Hi there :)

just a quick heads up regarding objects like bicyle_parking: These don't have addresses that are tagged using the "addr:*=*" method. if you believe it to be really neccessary, please use this method:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:object:*

thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159504508
dancingCycle (2024-12-18 08:39:41+00:00): I understand. Cheers!
OldManCelli (2024-12-11 13:23:56+00:00): Tera, can you please make sure that you are closing all the buildings you create? I've seen a few buildings in this area that you created that are not valid building shapes. I'm specifically looking at w1337172885 right now and I'll fix it, but please look into the process that you are using that may be creating multiple nodes for a building. One hint that there is a problem is the "warning:close_nodes:vertices" that ID should have given you when you tried to commit this change. I would also say that if you are using ID you may want to use the "q" key to square houses as you go - this will not only square the house but it will indicate where you may have bad building polygons. 

Thanks for your contribution!! Happy mapping
emersonveenstra (2024-11-23 17:23:05+00:00): Hi there,

I had to revert this edit because you accidentally dragged a building very far away (see the visualization here: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1087534298). The editor did warn you of this when you went to save, so in the future please pay attention to those warnings!
emersonveenstra (2024-11-23 17:23:58+00:00): I'm not exactly sure what you were trying to do, so feel free to re-do it, just without dragging anything else into it :)