piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2025-12-26 15:34:32+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping. 

B: Overlapping buildings.
C: Collected adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
D: Connecting nodes to other features.
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.



Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175560711
bartgron (2025-12-05 21:54:34+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
bartgron (2025-12-05 21:54:29+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
bartgron (2025-12-05 21:54:23+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Frans S (2026-01-19 14:40:04+00:00): Helo. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not connect nodes of buildings to other features like roads.
These are issues that need to be solved.
The Issue triangle should show these issues.
Best regards
mcliquid (2026-02-22 08:40:43+00:00): Hi, wieso wird der POI vom LIDL jetzt Bestandteil der Straße und der Relation?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/296933908

Fährt der Bus durch den Lidl? :O
Alex-r95 (2026-02-22 08:52:59+00:00): Gute Frage warum auf einmal beim give_way der Lidl-Tag drin war. habe es rausgenommen
mcliquid (2026-02-22 08:55:37+00:00): Vielen Dank!
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-05 20:46:55+00:00): You appear to have mapped eleven buildings as one single huge building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175561564
Beinardus (2025-12-06 01:39:01+00:00): I've tried to split them now. I didn't notice it was such a large area; looked like a cluster of containers on the Bing satelite image. Still hard to get the correct outlines.
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-06 01:48:49+00:00): Aah.  Yeah, row buildings can be hard to tell apart sometime.  A good context clue in the US and western Canada  (especially railroad boom towns like this one built ~1880-1930) is that the tightest density tends to be near the railroad tracks, and streets named Front, Railroad, Main or similar, and the main drag is probably a terrace of row buildings.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-03 19:42:50+00:00): Hello!

You used
healthcare=clinice
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7871077754/history

Have you maybe meant
healthcare=clinic
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Supaplex (2026-02-04 10:42:01+00:00): Hi

I will fix it
Thanks for the reminder
bartgron (2025-12-05 21:54:18+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
acubens71 (2025-12-05 19:38:19+00:00): Ai réutilisé les tags de la version 7 du bâtiment.
Carkedykus (2025-12-12 14:29:36+00:00): Mag ik vragen waarom dit is reverted?
bartgron (2025-12-05 21:54:10+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
NeisBot (2025-12-13 22:44:14+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Heating and air conditioning service in Oshawa"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 17:18:42+00:00): 🔴 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by https://osm.org/changeset/176016060
eklipses (2026-04-28 22:29:49+00:00): Main base of 616 Brigade has moved to 25.901338 114.961367.
rempshaener (2025-12-05 20:18:40+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Da das Anlegen von Hydranten per Script insgesamt  eher selten und in Fällen, in denen man die Daten eigenständig erhoben hat, umso ungewöhnlicher ist, möchte ich vorsorglich auf  osm.wiki/DE:Import/Guidelines bzw. osm.wiki/DE:Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct hinweisen.
Viele Grüße
chr_meier1997 (2025-12-05 20:37:25+00:00): Hallo vielen Danke für die Info. Ich habe mir die einmal durchgelesen. Wenn ich das richtig verstehe ist hier vor allem wichtig das die Datenbank dabei nicht beschädigt wird, und keine Objekte falsch geändert werden. Ich trage für unsere Ortsfeuerwehr die Hydranten ein damit wir diese für Einsätze schneller finden. Von ca 20 stück haben dich Koordinaten, sodass ich diese per Script anlegen lasse (nur add kein edit). Ich überprüfe jeden node nach dem erstellen manuell. Die weiteren werden wahrscheinlich auch händisch per App eingetragen, da hier keine Koordinaten vorliegen. 
Beste Grüße
rempshaener (2025-12-05 20:47:53+00:00): Hallo,
danke für die Rückmeldung.
Das klingt erfreulich harmlos.
Ja, die Hürden sind ziemlich hoch, das aber auch nicht ohne Grund.
Die Hauptprobleme, die immer wieder auftreten:
- Rechte an den Daten
- Aktualität
- Genauigkeit
- Umgang mit bestehende Daten (Dublettenvermeidung)
Dann weiterhin viel Spaß und Erfolg
Viele Grüße
tracker51 (2025-12-10 00:30:19+00:00): Ich konnte am Abend des 09.12.2025 nicht feststellen, dass die Straße gesperrt wäre! Der Gehweg auf der Westseite war zwar gesperrt, Geh- und Radweg auf der Ostseite werden aber als gemeinsamer Weg (Vz. 240) auf dem abgetrennten rechten Fahrbahnrand der östlichen Fahrbahn geführt. Autoverkehr war nicht eingeschränkt!
osmmapper222 (2025-12-10 19:38:23+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Die Fahrtbeschränkung für Autos habe wieder entfernt. Den tagesaktuellen Stand der Befahrbarkeit der Baustelle kann man in OSM nicht pflegen.

Daher belasse ich es dabei, die Straße als "Road under construction" zu taggen.
tracker51 (2025-12-11 00:01:58+00:00): Danke. Da ich an dieser Stelle immer mal wieder vorbeikomme, werde ich mich bei geänderten Verhältnissen ggf.  melden.
stasiu512 (2025-12-05 21:37:44+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Lishoo (2025-12-07 14:41:15+00:00): Dodałem budynki i drogi korzystając z ortofotomapy i wizyty w terenie.
stasiu512 (2025-12-05 21:57:29+00:00): Cześć, ruch jest dwukierunkowy na północnej jezdni.
vrix (2025-12-06 11:51:12+00:00): Hello, why did you change the admin levels of regions in Czechia?

I see here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative#admin_level.3D.2A_Country_specific_values that "regions" (NUTS3) should be admin_level = 6 and NUTS2 statistical regions should be admin_level = 4
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2025-12-06 12:51:55+00:00): Hello,
are there any rules which admin level should have NUTS2 and NUTS3?

In Czechia, we have between districts and towns/villages two administrative levels: "obec s rozšířenou působností" (ORP which is usually used) and "obec s pověřeným úřadem" (POÚ, I think their borders aren't commonly used). Which levels will you use if you want to map ORP and POÚ when districts have admin_level=7 and towns/villages admin_level=8?
vrix (2025-12-07 11:39:42+00:00): Hi, I don't think there are rules. I was just noting that now the OSM data and the link I posted above are not consistent. I wanted to make sure that this was an intentional change that was discussed internally and not a mistake. And if so maybe that page should be updated?
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2025-12-07 14:06:14+00:00): Yeah, I go on it. But Prague districts is for that moment accidentally admin level 5 and not 7. I'll map other Prague districts levels too.
tеchnetium (2025-12-09 10:34:02+00:00): Are you still working on the admin levels of Prague?
You now got: Hlavní město Praha, id435514 al4 which is a parent to obvod 1 to 10
But obvod Praha 1, id17444551, al5 is a parent for (the whole) Praha id17444551, al8. Which in turn is parent to 108 admin level 10 areas? and Praha, id15107966, al9, which is parent to 5 admin level areas
I found those maps, but since I'm not local, I don't know how accurate they are.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6e/Prague_Subdivisions.svg
https://maps-prague.com/img/0/prague-district-map.jpg
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2025-12-09 12:23:50+00:00): Yes, I still work on Prague districts, I will map 22 districts and 57 city parts (Prague has multilevel administrative division, and Czechia too, that's because I upgrade to highter admin levels). And when I done, I update Czechia admin levels on OSM Wiki.
vrix (2025-12-14 18:44:36+00:00): Notice that users are already reverting your changes, as they are not properly documented https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/442452#map=9/50.569/13.797
vrix (2025-12-14 18:46:12+00:00): The changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175922308
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2025-12-20 18:46:52+00:00): Prague has 112 cadastral areas, not 108.
silversurfer83 (2025-12-06 09:42:40+00:00): Hi :)

wäre das nicht eigentlich etwas für die OHM (openhistoricalmap)?

Gruß aus dem Waldecker Land
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175563374
silversurfer83 (2026-02-14 10:19:56+00:00): Moin,

ich schmeiß die Relation bei Gelegenheit wieder raus. Da wir bei OSM "nur" den Stand "jetzt" abbilden, hat diese Relation hier nichts verloren.

Grüße
silversurfer83 (2026-04-06 20:30:20+00:00): Da keine Rückmeldung kam hab ich sie wieder entfernt.
NeisBot (2025-12-13 22:44:15+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Dental clinic in Oakville"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 17:19:08+00:00): 🔴 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by https://osm.org/changeset/176016088
jm428 (2025-12-06 02:13:01+00:00): Hi, I reverted this changeset because there is no longer a path there. The imagery isn't up to date but there is a new computer science building that just opened this fall that connects to the right side of the old computer science building, so there isn't a path that goes through there anymore.
Last time I checked (probably about 2 weeks ago) there were still some construction fences set up around the building so I hadn't made any edits to the area yet, but sometime next week I'll try to get a rough outline of the building and map out the paths that are currently open.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175570334
JuanElDemografo (2025-12-06 04:12:19+00:00): It looks like you may've applied English Bayou to one or two segments it probably shouldn't go on. I would consult the USGS GNIS domestic name search map for river names. When you pin a stream from the search results it will show the mouth and the source on the map, and you can usually figure out the rest in-between.

Additionally, you can remove all the junk NHD import tags. There are a few that can be helpful when manually reviewing old imports, but here they don't do anything.
Clairness (2025-12-09 23:22:15+00:00): That is a really good resource, actually. I think I stumbled upon it in the past, but never really knew how to use it. Thank you! My next edit is in this area still, so I will correct it before publishing that edit.
eggie (2025-12-06 08:47:51+00:00): Hoi,

Netjes getekend.
Vreemd dat in het Kadaster Europaplein 1 niet bestaat.
Het zou daar allemaal Kerkstraat zijn.
Is hier officieel wat veranderd?
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=europaplein+1+hulsberg&objectId=0951100000003502&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=188159.19121983805&geometry.y=322316.4991915619&zoomlevel=13.523867506802555&bijbehorendeAdressen=Pand

.. en loopt het Kadaster nog achter. 
Dan zou een terugmelding op z'n plaats zijn.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=europaplein+1+hulsberg&objectId=0951100000003502&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=188159.19121983805&geometry.y=322316.4991915619&zoomlevel=13.523867506802555&bijbehorendeAdressen=Pand

MVG
eggie
Wonderful Alligator (2025-12-06 14:42:32+00:00): Hi,

I have used the address from google maps with the rest of information provided by the business. It might be that the address might be incorrect. Should I use the address from Kadaster?

Wonderful Alligator
eggie (2025-12-06 14:49:20+00:00): Hi..
I really don't know.
Google is not allowed as source.
The website fom the shop is allowed. But there is no website I believe?
Anyway.. the shop is there. You may remove the address? 
It's not existing.
Greetz..
eggie
rempshaener (2025-12-06 19:03:03+00:00): Hallo,
bei der Saugstelle passt emergency=fire_hydrant
nicht so richtig zu fire_hydrant:position=lane.
Und es fehlt die Bauart.
Wie genau ist die Saugstelle denn aufgebaut?
Viele Grüße
MB_UA (2025-12-06 21:15:58+00:00): Hallo,
Danke für den Hinweis.
Das eine ist nur eine Saugstelle, als HInweis, dass hier der Zugang zum Bach gut gewährleistet ist.
Habe hoffentlich beides korrigert.
Gruß
Shahram Sh Kamal (2025-12-05 21:43:33+00:00): yes  good
Branko Kokanovic (2026-03-26 11:20:33+00:00): Zasto si izbacivao ref:RS:kucni_broj sa svih ovih posta?
Branko Kokanovic (2026-04-27 11:50:02+00:00): Vracam sad sve redom. Revert ne mogu da koristim - em se promenilo mnogo stvari, em necu da revertujem  izmene telefona. Ali napravio si posao od mesec dana da sve ovo vratim sad. Nemoj, molim te, da brises ref:RS:kucni_broj bez konsultacija
AndyB_66 (2025-12-21 19:29:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
MassCartog (2025-12-05 22:13:13+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Even decommissioned trails should not be removed until they no longer exist. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

I have made sure to change the feature type to "Driveway" and set the "access" to "private". It has now been mapped correctly, and other services that do use OSM data will not route people down that way.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
MassCartog (2025-12-05 22:18:19+00:00): Also now OSM has it correctly marked, private access will be more clear, and routing engines will not route people that way any longer if they are using OSM data. 

But it is NOT correctly mapped on Google Maps, they have it as a road. People are much more likely using Google Maps for navigation, not OSM, but you will have to reach out to google to fix that.
ExoMal (2025-12-08 12:34:38+00:00): I didn't know there was any open data available to assign postcodes, figured Royal Mail would hold their monopoly forever. Thanks a lot for your work!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175566727
felipeeugenio (2025-12-06 13:29:49+00:00): Hola. Cuál es el motivo de eliminar una localidad entera? Son importaciones que hicimos del INE.

La vamos a reponer, pero por favor dar mayores explicaciones en en changesets.

gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175567615
Tamani Wolf (2025-12-05 23:10:18+00:00): Die Ausbesserung der Linien-Relationen für die CeBus wird in den nächsten Monaten folgen.
felipeeugenio (2025-12-09 11:34:55+00:00): Hello,

The reason you mention for restoring the project is precisely the reason why it was deleted by the community. It lacks a confirmed construction date, secured financing, and any observable physical presence on the ground. At this stage, it remains only a conceptual drawing, similar to many other unmaterialized projects in Chile. This project has existed since the early 2000s and has been postponed multiple times.

We kindly ask that you engage with the community to discuss this matter further and address the comments made in your previous changesets, where the reasons for reverting your edits were explained in detail.

Regards,
felipeeugenio (2025-12-09 11:36:51+00:00): In the very same link you provided it is stated that this is only a study.

regards
Hexalogical (2025-12-10 08:28:14+00:00): My main confusion is that a similar project in Coquimbo/La Serena has not been deleted despite also not being confirmed.
felipeeugenio (2025-12-10 08:41:08+00:00): It was deleted some ago I understand, unless someone redid it. I'll check.
We deleted a los of those projects. 
Regards
uprkos (2026-07-04 20:50:09+00:00): O co chodzi z nazwą '191-letnie Sosny na torfowisku'?
Yog Sot (2026-07-04 22:37:52+00:00): W raportach Fundacji Las Naturalny 191-letnie sosny na torfowiskach Borów Tucholskich są opisywane jako starodrzewy o kluczowych funkcjach wodochronnych i klimatycznych, które zamiast ochrony są narażone na komercyjną gospodarkę leśną. Fundacja definiuje te obszary jako starolasy (bory bagienne), które uległy degradacji i wykazują obniżoną odporność na susze, wymagając tym samym wyłączenia z użytkowania rębnego. Więcej informacji można znaleźć w artykule na ngo.pl.
Wejdz w raport czerwiec–lipiec
uprkos (2026-07-05 07:10:59+00:00): Nie potrafię tego znaleźć. Ale tak czy inaczej, czy to powinno być oznaczone jako 'name'? Za rok to będą już 192-letnie sosny...
Yog Sot (2026-07-05 08:06:28+00:00): hm, no tak, link w komentarzu na zadziałał https://publicystyka.ngo.pl/raport-fundacji-las-naturalny-nadal-tracimy-najcenniejsze-lasy 
A co do roku, to też to zauważam, ale jednak taka liczba do nazwy została wybrana i ona jest rozpoznawalna. Różnych AI można pytac i wiedzą o co chodzi od razu np. Zmieniając rok juz niekoniecznie się okazuje, więc myślę, że nie jest źle :)
bartgron (2025-12-06 19:36:41+00:00): Zestaw zmian nieprawidłowy, wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175598840
bartgron (2025-12-06 19:37:34+00:00): Zestaw zmian nieprawidłowy, wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175598861
bartgron (2025-12-06 19:38:06+00:00): Zestaw zmian nieprawidłowy, wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175598882
aharvey (2025-12-06 05:18:40+00:00): It seems like these change continuously and you're endlessly updating the tags. If these values change so often do you need to have these updated in OSM?
donmac703 (2025-12-08 08:29:17+00:00): The tags change every 2-3 months, it seems, so probably not "continuously". Some of the information is required to be able to unambiguously reconcile routes. When the OSM routes are (mostly) completed in NSW, it will be time to take stock of how to maintain them in a labour-effective way moving forward, but at the current rate of progress it will be some time in mid-2026 or so.
JuanElDemografo (2025-12-06 04:17:52+00:00): Black Bayou would probably be classified as a waterway=river for most of the length you mapped. Additionally, you can also add the USGS GNIS ID from the domestic name search, perhaps to a waterway relation.
Apathetic_Engineer (2025-12-07 16:09:44+00:00): Oh good point. I was assuming river ment commercially navigable (Calcasieu, Mississippi, Sabine River, intracostal), but I reviewed the wiki and see that I need to reduce my threshold for what a big channel would be. I’ll update it. Good tip on the gnis ID. I have a lot of the NHD data downloaded for the area so I’ll check on it.
Fen <3 (2025-12-07 03:09:36+00:00): Hello and welcome! try to briefly describe what you are updating in the change-set comment something like "added address tags"
Comino (2025-12-06 09:23:26+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
felipeeugenio (2025-12-06 13:35:49+00:00): Hola. 
Varias correcciones.
Las puertas de entrada no van en los cruces. No están en los cruces.
Los nombres de las calles son los nombres oficiales, no descripciones de dónde están.
Lo mismo con los parques. Si no tienen nombre, no agregar el tag. Además, no todas las áreas verdes son parques.

Por último, hay unos cuantos caminos que parecen no existir.

Estos errores no son graves y se ven con frecuencia en quienes comienzan a mapear. Pero le pedimos por favor tomar contacto por cualquier duda en el chat de la comunidad OSM Chile en Telegram. El link de acceso al chat está en mi perfil.

Saludos y muchas gracias
synthfi (2025-12-06 01:03:48+00:00): also changed a ford into a bridge as that was obvious from imagery
pwbriggs (2025-12-24 06:56:05+00:00): Thanks, where did you get this data?
sm4rk0 (2026-06-06 23:38:50+00:00): You can't turn left to Zemunski put from Vladimira Popovića. The only way is to the right. Not sure if you got it right, but this is the second time that OsmAnd navigates me in wrong direction. Correcting it.
Shoorick (2026-06-09 10:41:17+00:00): May be it would better to split Zemunski if left part has oneway=no. Maybe I’ll go here in few days and check signs on the ground.
But anyway right part of Zemunsky put between Vladimira Popovića and traffic light at Sajmište has correct direction — to former Stari Savski bridge.
Shoorick (2026-06-10 21:32:03+00:00): Checked today, 10.06.2026. Zemunski put between ul. Vladimira Popovića and Sajmište completely closed. Vladimira Popovića between Milentija Popovića and Zemunski put closed too, only buses can enter to okretnica Blok 20. Photos with track uploaded to Mapillary.
The roads changed to highway=construction https://osm.org/changeset/183944124
sm4rk0 (2026-06-10 22:00:01+00:00): 👏
jhaluska80 (2025-12-15 18:06:51+00:00): If you switch the background to Mapbox Satellite you can see there is a nearby building visible to the West or is the address associated with the driveway a  little North?

Only asking cause most routing algorithms will route to Ironwood place and not Birch lane with the current placement.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-07 10:34:18+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/prosby-o-zmapowanie-poprawe/64939/3135

skąd niby te rzekome nazwy?