piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Anonymous36863 (2025-12-20 09:22:50+00:00): massive area
Aethonatic (2025-12-20 10:53:27+00:00): Edits are spread out, with some in the United Kingdom, Malaysia, and Indonesia. Please keep changesets local.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-12-21 12:00:32+00:00): Same here, Crémazie stays at layer 0 and Boulevard Pie-Ix goes under (cutting) at layer -1
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-12-21 12:04:40+00:00): I see the wiki explains that cuttings should not count as layer -1, so you are right. Seems weird that layers do not follow the terrain though. Forget what I said in the two other changesets too. Thanks!
HellMap (2025-12-20 20:26:29+00:00): Vai šim posmam https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/831170641 tagad ir uzliktas veloceļa zīmes? Jo vēl augusta beigās nebija. Cik zinu, te vienmēr ir bijis iztrūkstošs posms.
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:43:12+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13390354095 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "صنایع نیروگاهی آشا تولید برق"
---
برای مثال، یک نسخه خنثی‌تر و واقع‌بینانه‌تر از توضیحات شما می‌تواند این باشد: "صنایع نیروگاهی آشا تولید برق"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2025-12-30 08:06:08+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176614348
kingkingHK (2025-12-20 09:33:33+00:00): Are you sure about the `ele=`? Out-of-copyright maps say otherwise.
Taya_S (2026-01-12 12:10:33+00:00): All edits by this user have been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177135060
eggie (2025-12-20 11:07:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Je zet de wegen op slot door access=no
Dat lijkt me niet de bedoeling. foot=no kun je toevoegen als er een wit bord rode rand met het voetgangertje staat.
Ook dan behoudend taggen, want soms mag je in de berm lopen of is er een trottoir waar je kunt lopen.
Dit is in ieder geval niet correct.
motor_vehicle=yes hoort niet getagd te worden op reguliere wegen.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-20 11:21:44+00:00): reverted by changeset #176175926 due to wrong interpretation access=no on roads.
eggie (2025-12-20 11:19:35+00:00): reverted by changeset #176175838 due to wrong interpretation  access=no on roads.
eggie (2025-12-20 11:17:41+00:00): Van welk punt is de Hollandiaweg private? 

MVG
eggie
Famlam (2025-12-31 10:41:39+00:00): Ik ben er even langsgereden: er staat inderdaad een "verboden toegang voor onbevoegden"-bordje (een paar meter verder dan nu aangegeven, maar goed genoeg :) ). Er wordt ook vanalles gebouwd daarachter dus het zal waarschijnlijk binnenkort veranderen gok ik
eggie (2025-12-20 11:14:03+00:00): Ook hier weer access=no

Wanneer er een fietsverbod is C14 dan is het bicycle=no  In andere gevallen is het bicycle=use_sidepath.
access=no stuurt de hele routering door de war.

Waarom Verboden Toegang Voor wie?

Ik draai je edits terug.
Wanneer er een paralell fietspad fysiek loopt in OSM kun foot=use_sidepath gebruiken.
Een voetganger wordt geacht het trottoir of het fietspad te gebruiken.

Ik moet helaas je edits terud zetten. Graag stoppen met het toevoegen an access=no aan wegen en motor_vehicle=yes
Ga na of er bebording staat en welke.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-20 11:15:19+00:00): reverted by changeset #176175739
A67-A67 (2025-12-20 12:02:43+00:00): Deze wijziging is incorrect. Bij een onverplicht fietspad (bord G13) mag gewoon op de weg gefietst worden. 

De expliciete tag bicycle=yes en de notitie waren bedoeld om dit duidelijk te maken.
OvdLeur (2025-12-20 12:37:42+00:00): Hi, 

Dank voor je feedback. 

Ik ben het gedeeltelijk met je eens, de use_sidepath tag iis bij nader inzien inderdaad incorrect omdat het fietspad onverplicht is. 

De notitie en bicycle=yes zijn echter overbodig. Tenzij expliciet uitgezonderd is al het verkeer op een weg (passend bij het type highway) toegestaan. 

Ik zal deze aanpassingen maken. 

Hartelijke groeten, Oscar
A67-A67 (2025-12-20 15:10:42+00:00): De notitie is bedoeld om foutieve wijzigingen naar bicycle=use_sidepath te voorkomen. En zo te zien is deze dus wel nodig...

De tag note is bedoeld voor andere mappers, niet voor eindgebruikers.
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:43:19+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/6787484588 v3

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Dentist in Abingdon"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2025-12-30 08:06:08+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176180413
Thanks @ rskedgell
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:43:20+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13390423003 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Thai spa in Gulshan Dhaka"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2025-12-30 08:06:08+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176614350
Jacob Rosendal Kristensen (2025-12-20 09:33:42+00:00): Glædelig jul og ja, jeg kan også være doven og genbruger og genanvender derfor mine tekster til rettelse og ændrings loggen.
Waldo Lemmer (2025-12-20 11:26:58+00:00): Hi! May I ask why you removed the "operator" part? It's there to avoid conflicts with non-English name tags such as name:fr=* and name:de=*. I've also documented it at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses#Step_1_-_Add_bus_stops_to_OpenStreetMap based on the discussion at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop#How_to_Map_Multiple_Networks_using_Same_Bus_Stop
mueschel (2025-12-20 12:19:16+00:00): Hi,
I agree that especially for short operator names there might be the risk of conflicts. However, the scheme without 'operator' is by far the most common scheme.
However, if there is some discussion you have my full support for "officially" recommending adding 'operator' to the name tag.
martin-kokos (2026-01-11 12:07:25+00:00): Na Údolní jsou stále značky: zákaz vjezdu mimo povolení stavby
Pavel_Š (2026-01-11 12:32:48+00:00): Nerozumím Vašemu komentáři… Na Údolní jsem odstranil tag Construction, protože tam už jezdí MHD. Tag Construction je v rozporu s jakýmkoliv provozem. Nebo se jedná o něco jiného? Já řeším pouze MHD. Do značek, pruhů apod. nezasahuji. Hlavně to nezměňte tak, že Public Transport bude házet chyby, na to už jsem od některých trochu alergický.
martin-kokos (2026-01-11 12:45:40+00:00): Taky jste změnil celou ulici z highway=contruction na tertiary. Až teď jsem si všiml, že jste přidal i access=no, tak asi zatím vpořádku.
Pavel_Š (2026-01-11 12:57:00+00:00): Ano, to jsem napsal, že jsem odstranil Construction a vybral jsem logicky původní typ ulice. A ano, pro zachování obecné neprůjezdnosti jsem přidal access. Myslím, že takto to přesně odpovídá skutečnosti. U nás se tag Construction používá občas nerozumně. Pokud tam může vjet něco mimo stavbu, tedy i MHD, tag Construction tam nesmí být.
rhhs (2025-12-20 12:04:07+00:00): Hi again: I made some edits to this block so you can see how it's usually mapped. We normally don't add addresses to shop and entrance nodes if the building they are in already has an address. Only on staircase entrances we add the entrance letter in the ref=* tag (for instance ref=А; А should be Cyrillic A)
Happy mapping!
eggie (2025-12-20 11:30:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-20 11:34:08+00:00): Feedback  'k Zie dar de operator=Arriva op de bushalte staat. Op bushaltes hoort geen tag operator. Die hoort op de relatie van de busroute zelf. Dat is trouwens Qbuzz hier.
De operator kan er dus denk ik af.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-20 11:35:39+00:00): Ik stuur het even door naar een van de OV mappers.
VLD0251 (2025-12-20 15:09:31+00:00): Hi,
"pharmacy" is a generic term and should not be used as a name
please only enter the official, verifiable name or leave the field blank.
thank you for your contribution
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:43:21+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13390469389 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Insurance business in Grand Prairie"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2025-12-30 08:06:09+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/176175777
Thanks @ mueschel
kingkingHK (2025-12-20 11:21:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1235498283 ...`=secondary_link`? Why?
vectorial8192 (2025-12-20 18:31:02+00:00): It turns out, vehicles can do a (special) u-turn to turn towards the Prince Edward Road East bridge. afaik there are basically no intersections in HK where a non-dedicated u-turn is required to get to a destination.

Earlier I did not know/notice this, and put a note in this area ("Dakota Drive should not get =secondary"). Still, it can't possibly be "highway=secondary", which causes confusion; the road does not "continue" like this. If it were "=secondary_link" it would be much clearer.
Rainero-repair (2026-04-01 12:26:36+00:00): Revert in changeset/180719387
wegen nicht zulässiger Quelle (Bayernatlas).  
Letzter Changeset von 193 revertierten.
kytta (2026-06-05 09:02:37+00:00): Hallo!

Mir ist aufgefallen, dass du bei diesem Edit amenity=shop hinzugefügt hast. Das ist kein valider Tag – besonders, weil der Laden schon richtig mit shop=* erfasst ist.

Achte bei deinen nächsten Bearbeitungen bitte mal auf die Warnungen, die dir der Editor (iD) anzeigt, die helfen da super weiter. Und schau bitte auch, dass der Änderungssatz-Kommentar zu deinen tatsächlichen Bearbeitungen passt.

Gruß 👋
Frans S (2026-01-10 11:46:49+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Check this path, please 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1453010709/history#map=17/3.118776/44.886113
You added  barrier=wall to it.
Why? I cannot find any barrier here.
Removed the tagging.
btw. A path is by default unpaved. no need to add that tag.
Best regards
M!dgard (2025-12-20 10:20:37+00:00): Also some addresses in Kortrijk were set to Ghent which, in light of the earlier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176160001, reeks of vandalism
A67-A67 (2025-12-27 21:41:51+00:00): This road doesn't exist anymore. Please don't readd it.
lenoxys (2025-12-20 10:34:48+00:00): Le truc c'est que si je ferme l'accès de la route de la Hilliere, c'est tout la route qui est fermée au véhicule motorisé et pas qu'un seul segment.
MxxCon (2025-12-22 05:16:41+00:00): Hello.
Why did you delete railway=station and train=yes tags here?
vasony (2025-12-24 06:51:58+00:00): Kedves az everydoor-tól, hogy nem használ lifecycle prefixet, csak törli
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:43:25+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/9202841782 v2

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Agência de serviços de informática"
---
Por exemplo, uma versão mais neutra e factual da sua descrição poderia ser: "Agência de serviços de informática"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2025-12-30 08:06:09+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176614351
hauke-stieler (2026-04-10 12:49:26+00:00): Moin,

eine Anmerkung zu den Wegen, die du hier in letzter Zeit angelegt hast. An sich ist das ok, in OSM kann man schließlich ne ganze Menge eintragen. Aber die waren aber leider unvollständig getaggt und gerade zu taggen, ob und wer einen Weg benutzen darf, ist sehr wichtig.

Bei neuen und vor Ort nicht beschilderten Wegen/Trails in NSGs gilt i.d.R. "access=no". In NSGs darf man offizielle Wege einfach nicht verlassen, auch wenn das schön wäre. Bei alten seit zig Jahren/Jahrzehnten bestehenden Wegen ist leider nicht immer erkennbar, ob sie "offiziell" sind oder nicht. Es gibt leider auch keine eindeutigen amtlichen Daten dazu. Bei frischen MTB-trails und sonstigen neuen Pfaden ist es aber 100%ig "access=no" wenn es nicht einer der wenigen ausgeschilderten und genehmigten Trails ist.

Außerhalb von NSGs ist es in Hamburg und Niedersachsen so, dass Fußgänger auch außerhalb offizieller Wege gehen dürfen, Radfahrer/MTB aber nicht. Außerhalb eines NSG sollten also neue Wege/Trails, die vor Ort nicht beschildert sind, mit "bicycle=no" getaggt werden.

Bei solchen inoffiziellen Wegen setze ich zudem immer "informal=yes", um zu kennzeichnen, dass es eben kein offizieller Weg ist, sondern die access/bicycle tags implizit aus der gesetzlichen Situation in dem Gebiet hervorgehen.

Das Thema der Wege ist relativ sensibel. Nicht nur kam schon das BUKEA mit Beschwerden auf die Hamburger Community zu, es lagen auch schon Gesetzentwürfe zum Bundeswaldgesetz zur Diskussionen vor, die verboten hätten, dass man in OSM Wege in Wäldern erfassen darf. Das Thema digitale Wege in Wäldern ist immer noch am köcheln, deswegen sollten wir da gut aufpassen.

Es entspricht zudem auch der OSM "on the ground"-Regel, dass wir die Situation vor Ort korrekt abbilden und die Situation ist nun mal eben rechtlich so wie oben beschrieben.

Ich habe einige Wege im Tagging angepasst und versuche sie auch vor Ort einmal zu besuchen, wenn ich in der Region bin.

Viele Grüße
Hauke
Jörg Roßdeutscher (2026-04-15 20:08:03+00:00): Hallo Hauke, Danke für die Erklärung — ich werde das zukünftig besser beachten.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-12-20 19:14:44+00:00): Merhaba. Değişiklik açıklamalarınıza neleri değiştirdiğini yazabilir misiniz? "." koymanız değişikliğinizde neler olduğu hakkında hiçbir fikir vermiyor. Lütfen bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Yol sınıflarını değiştirme gerekçenizi de yazar mısınız? Aşıkpaşa Caddesi, Kızlarpınarı Caddesi, buraların yol sınıflarını neden highway=secondary 'den highway=residential 'a düşürdünüz? 

Lütfen şu sayfaları okuyunuz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tr:Turkey_roads_tagging

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
rskedgell (2025-12-21 12:37:02+00:00): Thanks for adding these.

When the feature only had an English language name=* before you added name:ar=* please could you also duplicate the original in name:en=* ? Some data consumers can exhibit unexpected behaviour with incomplete tagging of multilingual names.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Repeating_name_with_language_specific_tag
Jobigutenburg (2025-12-21 13:48:51+00:00): Sure, I will do.
Jobigutenburg (2025-12-21 14:48:18+00:00): This is the final one.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176221006
Pikse (2026-06-03 17:03:40+00:00): way/484500467 – this way is only to make the water network complete, it isn't part of a named river. So it don't think it should have been made part of the river (relation/3832837) here. Neither is the source lake (relation/3832833) part of the river really.

way/45486073 – why it was needed to make the river centreline and country border apart from one another here?

I agree that border segments like way/45486074 should not carry name "Eesti - Россия", as this isn't a name really. But why this "name" was moved to "ref" key? I don't think it is a reference number or code of any kind either.
Hb- (2026-06-04 08:24:27+00:00): 1. Corrected with changeset/183630723

2. Border is based on cadastral data/mapping and river flow is based on nature. So two different ways are recommended.

3. Putting the names of the two neighbours as ref on the border way is a habit to make editing OSM easier. Typically the names of the neighbouring villages are used.
Pikse (2026-06-04 12:54:47+00:00): Border segments actually can be either orographic or cartographic, i.e. defined by either natural features like rivers or by coordinates. Also the definition of country borders normally is superior to any cadastral mapping. This particular border segment is defined as orographic, see https://www.riigiteataja.ee/et/akt/113012015015#para3lg2p15 – so  I see no reason to think that you made border data or river data more accurate here.

Names of the two neighbours as ref? I haven't encountered such habit so far, and it still makes little sense to me. Is it documented somewhere? There have been complaints about using "name" key for such pseudo-names in the past, and in at least one occasion DWG has simply removed these.
Hb- (2026-06-04 13:09:29+00:00): If the river is the border please feel free to remove the way and place a note on the river.

Refs appear in the relation editor while notes do not.
user_5359 (2025-12-21 08:48:23+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1061113663. What is the mean of the tag 夏吾杂扎街 = 觉悟路?
neverdance (2025-12-21 15:00:52+00:00): Fixed
eggie (2025-12-20 14:12:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
mai-3ali (2025-12-20 12:07:32+00:00): -2185-
empty_child (2025-12-22 09:05:58+00:00): Mmm88mmM, добрый день
Бассейны лучше тегировать согласно вики (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Swimming_and_bathing)
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:43:29+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13390700313 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Financial services agency"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2025-12-30 08:06:10+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176205536
Thanks @ user_5359
Henry572 (2025-12-20 12:26:05+00:00): Siehe auch https://ris-duesseldorf.itk-rheinland.de/sessionnetduebi/vo0050.asp?__kvonr=100938
Henry572 (2025-12-20 12:30:16+00:00): Siehe auch https://www.duesseldorf.de/aktuelles/news/detailansicht/newsdetail/der-ersatzneubau-der-gemeinschaftsgrundschule-vennhauser-allee-ist-eingeweiht
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:43:30+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13390729239 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Allstate agency in Parker Colorado"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 17:07:51+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/176192479
Thanks @ jjyach
kingkingHK (2025-12-20 13:37:05+00:00): Hi there, would `note=level: 2 through 6` be better represented as `level=2-6`?
vectorial8192 (2025-12-20 18:32:31+00:00): Agreed in principle, but it seems "multi-level mapping" is undocumented in the OSM wiki, and I shall remain defensive on this.
kingkingHK (2025-12-21 02:55:38+00:00): I quote https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level#Multiple_values

> Use a hyphen (-) to specify a range of numbers with no missing values. E.g. the elevator of a 32-storey high-rise with two basement levels will be tagged `level=-2-32`.
vectorial8192 (2025-12-21 03:11:25+00:00): I scrolled to the "ground floor" table and then thought there's nothing more...
vectorial8192 (2025-12-21 03:12:55+00:00): Improved with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176203026
Fraxi (2025-12-20 21:07:37+00:00): Здравейте!
Ако обикновени леки коли не могат да преминават по тези пътища, може да смените стойността на етикета за гладкост (smoothness) от bad на друг според https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness
Fraxi (2025-12-20 21:10:16+00:00): Имах предвид https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness#Smoothness под третата колона ("Usable by")
mavl (2025-12-21 07:35:20+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пакет правок добавляет непрямоугольное здание. На снимке esri здание прямоугольное.
Ozon OSM15 (2025-12-21 11:48:30+00:00): Здравствуйте. Прошу прощения.
Не  переключилась между фоновым изображением и добавила неверно.
Буду внимательней.
sm4rk0 (2025-12-21 16:38:56+00:00): Исправка: не треба додати сегмент у релацију. iD је то већ урадио.
VLD0251 (2025-12-20 15:23:06+00:00): Hi,
please leave a comment describing your changes to facilitate understanding and follow-up.
Thank you for your contribution
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:43:32+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13390761945 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Ferrari Agency Allstate Insurance office"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 17:19:29+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176247268
Thanks @Ferrari Agency
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-01 17:25:27+00:00): Sorry, the last comment what not correct, it should be:

🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176205432
Thanks @user_5359