piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mapperich (2026-03-17 21:21:06+00:00): HI Pernycek, 
ist das Museum wieder geöffnet? laut wiki hat es 2020 geschlossen. 
Auch der User im Hinweis meint es ist geschlossen.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Museum_der_Johann_Strauss_Dynastie
amosharper (2025-12-04 13:41:51+00:00): Thanks for the contribution! Please do try to upload changes for different countries seperately where possible to keep the bounding box smaller, to help reduce noise for reviewers.

Some more info here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
HAALAND_ (2026-03-02 03:16:45+00:00): 菜鸟驿站的标签好像是包裹储物柜这类的吧
渤海西岸 (2026-03-02 08:45:01+00:00): 两种都有，看规模
HAALAND_ (2026-03-02 10:01:51+00:00): 好的好的👌
NieWnen (2026-05-10 13:29:38+00:00): Cześć,
tak na przyszłość, to CPRy tagujemy jako highway=path, a nie highway=footway

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w
eggie (2025-12-04 12:53:35+00:00): Beste 92 Het stond hier allemaal al goed getagd als construction 
De info die je hebt gezet achter foot en bicycle kun je op een note zetten.
Wanneer je het als conditional wilt taggen hoort die info er niet achter. 
Vanwege de lange duur heeft de voorgaande mapper de tag construction gebruikt. Dat houdt verkeer al tegen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-04 12:57:56+00:00): Oneigenlijke tagging achter https://www.gemeentestein.nl/projecten/brug-urmond#:~:text=De%20renovatie%20van%20brug%20Urmond,blijven%20voor%20fietsers%20en%20voetgangers.
verplaatst naar note=
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-03 12:46:18+00:00): 👋 На будущее: Яндекс.Карты для правок использовать нельзя
TinPetreković (2025-12-04 12:54:17+00:00): The node that was accidentally created was deleted in changeset 175492108 since it served no real purpose.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175492108
AndersAndersson (2025-12-04 14:30:28+00:00): Hello
How do you know that this is the English name for this islet?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/643841715
Sakari_N (2025-12-04 16:11:33+00:00): The above does not appear to be an english name, both name-tags appear to be finnish names. One of them should probably be alt_name, but I'm not sure.

Also this is not correct, name:en -key should be removed, it is duplicate of the street address.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/392914845/
AndersAndersson (2025-12-13 01:24:50+00:00): No response from 市川ゆり子.
I think this changeset shall be reverted.
市川ゆり子 (2025-12-14 00:18:42+00:00): Hi, Sorry for late reply. I'm sorry. It should be alt_name instead of name:en. alt_name is much more better. Could you do not revert changeset entirely please? Other edit in this set should be okay...
市川ゆり子 (2025-12-14 00:24:19+00:00): Sorry for way/392914845/ too. Its name:en is OK to remove...
AndersAndersson (2025-12-14 20:42:42+00:00): Thank you for your reply! I have just looked at a sample so I don't have the whole picture.
Maybe you could go through the changed things again and correct the tags that did not turn out to be so good?
市川ゆり子 (2025-12-15 00:13:25+00:00): Sure! I'll review my edit and fix tags.
AndersAndersson (2025-12-28 19:19:15+00:00): Hello again 市川ゆり子!
I see nothing has happened regarding to name:en on ting that should not have name:en. Did you go through the edits?
市川ゆり子 (2026-02-13 19:18:40+00:00): Sorry for long time no reply... Finally I will revert this changeset! So sorry for you guys.
felipeeugenio (2025-12-04 13:57:25+00:00): Buena. Ahí sí. Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175493332
maraf24 (2025-12-04 16:36:33+00:00): Polemizowałbym. Palowanie to nie wiadukt, tylko przygotowania do jego budowy.
Zaś wiadukt - w takim kształcie jaki zaznaczyłeś, wymagałby istnienia podpór.  Które jeszcze nie zostały zbudowane :)
AndyB_66 (2025-12-04 16:46:31+00:00): Oczywiście, masz prawo polemizować - zapraszam do dyskusji: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/drogi-w-budowie/94470/35
maraf24 (2025-12-04 19:48:33+00:00): Dla jasności - mi takie drogi construction, na obszarze na którym faktycznie są prace budowlane, dodatkowo na "pustkowiu" - nie przeszkadzają. 
W tym miejscu po prostu nikt ich jeszcze prawidłowo nie wprowadził.
MxW (2025-12-04 13:28:07+00:00): As per*
rempshaener (2025-12-04 17:24:40+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Numerische maxspeed-Angaben an highway=living_street sollten nicht genutzt werden, einzig die Angabe „walk“ gäbe die Situation richtig wieder, soll aber ebenfalls nicht genutzt werden (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=living%20street?uselang=de): „In Deutschland sollte keine zusätzliche Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkung mittels maxspeed=* gesetzt werden. Die offizielle Geschwindigkeit ist in der StVO mit Schrittgeschwindigkeit angegeben. Alle numerischen Werte entspringen einer uneinheitlichen Rechtsprechung. maxspeed= kann als implizierter Standardwert angenommen werden und braucht daher nicht gesetzt zu werden.“
Benötigst du Hilfe beim Zurücksetzen deiner Änderung? Dann einfach kurz melden.

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
Lokai (2025-12-08 16:15:35+00:00): Hallo,

dem schließe ich mich an. Die maximal zulässige Geschwindigkeit von 10 km/h ist nicht eindeutig korrekt und sollte entfernt werden.

Gruß

L
MarkoŠatrak (2025-12-06 13:55:08+00:00): Accidental node relocation made, node change reverted #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175587228
MarkoŠatrak (2025-12-06 13:57:08+00:00): Accidental node relocation made, node change reverted #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175587293
kingkingHK (2025-12-04 13:43:41+00:00): Actually they aren't; there are no gate/signage at all indicating a slope maintenance path, the bottom of the staircase is directly connected to a random sidewalk.
Szymson (2025-12-04 15:02:42+00:00): Błąd, dojazd do posesji z numerem 1G musi być service
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-03 19:29:32+00:00): Т.е. вы их придумали?
nevw (2025-12-04 22:34:59+00:00): Hi, the web site hours for the Moore Park Beach clinic has it closed on Sat and open on Sun.
ratrun (2025-12-06 04:15:58+00:00): Hallo!

Der Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456019850 ist nun Teil von zwei Wanderwegrelatioinen, allerdings mit access=no getagged. Das macht keinen Sinn, daher bitte ich um Korrektur.
NeisBot (2025-12-13 22:19:53+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Septic tank installation service in Middletown NY"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-13 22:48:11+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175512505
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-24 12:56:18+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI "United Sewer and Septic", with blatant advertising and malformed tags and source of Google Maps, at apparent residential location with no apparent POI verifiable on the ground in changeset 184522541

https://osm.org/changeset/184522541
Rodrigo Rega (2025-12-04 21:04:20+00:00): Hola, ¿qué razón hay para haber borrado "building:leveles=5" y "height=15"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175497869
Rodrigo Rega (2025-12-07 23:59:31+00:00): Revierto tras aclarar el error vía mensaje privado.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175643973
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-03 19:33:05+00:00): Но это уже отмечено ниже https://osm.org/node/10237551084/history
A35K (2025-12-04 17:01:52+00:00): Where exactly is the traffic sign 240? I haven´t seen any in real life at that location. The signs Mapillary shows are on the other side of the Ubahn and the cycleways are already mapped.
mcliquid (2025-12-05 09:34:40+00:00): Thanks! Reverted
BCNorwich (2025-12-06 08:39:35+00:00): Hi, You made lots of duplicated highway sections on the car parking service roads. I thin I've corrected/removed them all. Please try not to map any sections twice.

Regards Bernard.
Rodrigo Rega (2025-12-04 21:04:58+00:00): Hola, ¿qué razón hay para haber borrado "building:levels=2" y "height=6"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175498805
Rodrigo Rega (2025-12-07 23:59:59+00:00): Revierto tras aclarar el error vía mensaje privado.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175643981
kadiwa (2025-12-07 01:29:06+00:00): Hello MSCymz,

could you please explain the intention of this changeset? There is no tram in Hamburg.
Abijan (2026-01-24 11:42:37+00:00): Are you sure this is "éolienne" (wind energy)? I see a PV plant instead on Google Maps https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/552928639
JJIglesias (2025-12-04 17:34:29+00:00): Gracias, excelente aporte.

Te sugiero usar tambien la aplicacion MAPILLARY, para aportar con fotos al mapa.

Saludos
JJ
demon_box (2025-12-04 20:12:22+00:00): Ciao Giorovv, ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti un edificio può avere più entrate e di conseguenza più numeri civici. 
Quindi hai 2 opzioni: 
1. Se conosci esattamente la posizione (entrata) del civico che stai mappando metti tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su un nodo del perimetro dell'edificio (aggiungendo anche il tag entrance sullo stesso nodo);
2. Se invece non hai questa informazione così precisa devi mettere tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su nodo adiacente ma STACCATO dal poligono dell'edificio.
Ho già proceduto con le correzioni del caso. 
N.B.: mi riferisco a questo tuo edit
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/939500598/history#map=19/45.477064/10.240873
Grazie e BuonMapping!
LupeGimoozaabi (2025-12-05 12:57:40+00:00): Grazie demon, dev'essere stato un errore di cui non mi ero accorto.
Rom1 (2025-12-05 15:02:01+00:00): Le tag highway=busway serait à privilégier d'après https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway=busway?uselang=fr Merci.
ThatOneFilipinoExtremeist (2025-12-04 15:25:09+00:00): Before anybody comments, this bus route is PUBLICLY operated by the Municipality of Strathroy-Caradoc and the Cities of Sarnia & London. 

I am NOT making any privately operated bus routes in this map (eg: Megabus, Flixbus) as it ruins the transport map.
MarkoŠatrak (2025-12-06 12:18:52+00:00): Whole Hutton Street should have been restricted, there is a sign from the north at Granville Drive. Reverting because of unnecessary split #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175583406
cheatach (2025-12-05 01:15:24+00:00): dlaczego usunąłeś amenity=place_of_worship i religion=christian?
Dawid2849 (2025-12-05 13:28:14+00:00): Naprawiłem
trigpoint (2026-01-09 17:12:43+00:00): What is the source of this edit?

Cheers Phil
JonnyW03 (2026-01-10 14:59:28+00:00): Hi Phil, 

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/654/made
trigpoint (2026-01-10 15:41:08+00:00): You do realise that document contains maps which are Crow Copyright which is not Open Data and is therefore not a usable source for OSM?
trigpoint (2026-01-10 15:43:10+00:00): Crown Copyright sorry.
JonnyW03 (2026-01-10 15:43:43+00:00): It is an easily accessible map to depict the location of physical marker buoys on the water, which are not Crown Copyright. Hence why the document was not linked in my edit.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-22 17:44:11+00:00): if it was source of your edit then it is still invalid
Gumball3000 (2025-12-06 21:00:16+00:00): Hi, I noticed that the segment of Fichtestraße 71–75 was changed to pedestrian-only. Emergency vehicles are allowed on this road, and contractors are allowed in special circumstances. The surface is paved and wide enough for a car.

There is a flexible bollard at the entrance.

Leaving it as pedestrian-only causes routing issues and navigation apps will route incorrectly via nearby streets when trying to reach these numbers.
justinsenemy (2025-12-09 17:51:11+00:00): The parking lot layout has since changed and the "missing road" has been removed since the aerial imagery was taken! I'll revert the changes back. :) This was surveyed in person yesterday. Construction is changing stuff around here really quickly!
subham_lyft (2025-12-17 09:14:25+00:00): Hi justinsenemy,

My name is Shubham and I’m Ravinder’s teammate. We are mappers on the OSM team at Lyft.
Thank you for sharing your insights. Regarding my edits, they were made based on older aerial imagery, and at the time I did not observe any closures or active construction.
& yes,you are correct that construction work is currently ongoing. Please accept my apologies, and feel free to modify or revert our changes if needed.
Sorry for any inconvenience caused. I will be more cautious when submitting changesets in the future.

Regards,
Shubham
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 15:58:22+00:00): @[Vavrinec] you identified and mapped buildings in the imagery. 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom in so that you can accurately draw the footprint. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with `shift+(-/+)`, or JOSM with `ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag`.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175501972
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 15:59:53+00:00): @[Vavrinec] you identified and mapped buildings in the imagery. 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom in so that you can accurately draw the footprint. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with `shift+(-/+)`, or JOSM with `ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag`.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175501972
Dawid2849 (2025-12-04 21:16:44+00:00): Szkoda, że nijak te zmiany się nie pokrywają z rzeczywistością. source=survey nie jest "glitchem", który pozwala mapować fikcję.
Dawid2849 (2025-12-04 21:17:11+00:00): Oraz ciekawe jak potwierdziłeś te adresy za pomocą ortofotomapy...
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 16:11:25+00:00): Thank you for your contribution! 

You isentified buildings, but some could be more accurate.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom in so that you can accurately draw the footprint. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with `shift+(-/+)`, or JOSM with `ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag`.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

If the feature represented by the data no longer exists feel free to delete it as to not mix the history.

Keep on mapping!
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 16:07:19+00:00): Thank you for your contribution! 

You identified buildings, but they could be more accurately mapped.
After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners `q`, or circularise them `o`, because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely manually. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the ID Editor, you can `right click` for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size which may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough if you want every corner to be squared. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.

Keep on mapping!Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 16:05:32+00:00): You identified buildings in the imagery, mostly they are accurately mapped, just take care to exclude shadows on the ground and yards from the footprints.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175502646
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 16:26:30+00:00): Thank you for your contribution! 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom in so that you can accurately draw the footprint. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with `shift+(-/+)`, or JOSM with `ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag`.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as highways or residential areas. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data and accidentally creating shared(grey) nodes. This [video about connected nodes](https://youtu.be/ltn1VOiq5_0) has more information and a guide.

Keep on mapping!

Thanks for taking care to preserve histort please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history#Don't_mix_the_history
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 16:20:32+00:00): Was this an accidental edit? You can filter out features which are getting in your way via the map data panel `u` in ID.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175503239
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 16:21:47+00:00): All buildings added here look valid, but could be more accurately mapped; some are oversized.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom in so that you can accurately draw the footprint. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with `shift+(-/+)`, or JOSM with `ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag`.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Keep on mapping!
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 16:18:30+00:00): You may wish to compare the SE footpritns with Bing. The southern most one I would map as two buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175503243
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 16:13:50+00:00): the footprints I flagged include a yard.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175503258
Frans S (2025-12-05 11:32:16+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A few remarks. Don't cluster buildings .
Map round buildings as well.
Best regards and keep mapping
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-12-09 05:54:28+00:00): Merhaba.

Lütfen değişiklik açıklamalarınızda neleri neden değiştirdiğinizi kısaca açıklayınız: Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#Why_should_I_use_Changeset_Comments?

Yol sınıflarını neden değiştirdiğinizi lütfen açıklayınız. Örneğin Bişkek Caddesi’ni(eski 8.cadde) highway=secondary ‘den highway=tertiary’ e çevirmişsiniz. Neden? Paralelindeki daha az işlek Kazakistan Caddesi(eski 4.Cadde) bile highway=secondary ile etiketlenmişken Bişkek Caddesi gibi oldukça işlek bir caddenin yol sınıfını neden düşürdüğünüzü anlayamadım. Aynı husus diğer yol sınıfı değişikliklerinizi için de geçerli.

Lütfen şu Viki sayfalarını inceleyiniz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tr:Turkey_roads_tagging

Bir caddenin veya sokağın adı değiştiyse yolun eski adını old_name=* etiketine eklemekte yarar var. Ankara’da bilhassa bazı bölgelerde halk arasında yolların eski adları da halen kullanılmakta. Hatta bazı sokak tabelalarında bile yolların eski adları da eski …caddesi/sokağı şeklinde yazmakta. Örnek vermek gerekirse son değişikliğinizde adını değiştirdiğiniz Bişkek Caddesi(eski 8.cadde) buna iyi bir örnek. Adlandırma kuralları için ayrıca bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

Değişikliklerinizi kaydetmeden önce mümkün olduğunca kaynak belirtmeye çalışınız. Mesela bir yolun adı belediye meclis kararı ile değiştiyse ve henüz tabela yenilenmediyse bu değişikliğinizde belediye meclis kararının en azından tarihini ve numarasını source=* etiketine ekleyebilirsiniz. Etiket kullanımı için bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source

İyi günler.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-04 17:08:42+00:00): thanks for a fix!
SomeoneElse (2025-12-20 21:52:26+00:00): Hello,
Just for info, you can check for gaps in relations by a site such as e.g. http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=19918287 and http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=19918287 .
Best Regards,
Andy