piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2024-07-30 11:56:23+00:00): Wanneer het éen bosgebied is van dezelfde soort aanplanting kun je alles gewoon combineren.wanneer een  perceel andere tags heeft wordt het lastiger.
 Dan gewoon de nodes verbinden.

Mapse
eggie (2024-07-30 12:31:16+00:00): .. en dat laatste is het simpelste..
_Lies Boer (2024-07-30 12:40:59+00:00): Helemaal goed, ik heb hem op die manier opgelost :).
mcliquid (2024-07-30 09:20:09+00:00): Hi, can you link me to the discussion and wiki page for this large scale mechanical / automated edit? Thanks a lot!
Hungerburg (2024-07-31 19:46:23+00:00): This was a particularly bad edit. The contributor seems to not understand public transport mapping not the least.
johnny_1982 (2025-05-30 17:37:36+00:00): Gelöschtes Telefon an Charite steht heute immer noch da.
Frans S (2024-08-03 09:25:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped.
Just a remark.  The tower here. You mapped it just over the roof, but forgot to move the mapping to the footprint. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154593699
Dimacn (2024-07-30 18:29:00+00:00): Зачем вы добавили велосипедную дорожку поверх пешеходной дорожки? И добавляете переходы там где из нет? Я отменю вашу правку.
mavl (2024-07-30 13:43:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 154606945, 154607060, 154606852, 154606682, 154606922, 154606888, 154606817, 154607086, 154607139, 154607100, 154607116, 154606768, 154607328, 154606972, 154607347, 154607243, 154606611, 154607170, 154607000, 154607035, 154606643, 154607202, 154606740, 154606797, 154607308, 154607276, 154606705 where the changeset comment is: Whole World: the changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: duplicates of objects, undiscussed mass editing].
literan (2024-07-30 09:16:35+00:00): вы чего творите? вандализм
mavl (2024-07-30 09:59:29+00:00): @Zenfiric  
Hello. You are creating duplicate objects.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9896815542/history  
  
This object already exists.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5410122339
literan (2024-07-30 10:08:22+00:00): Zenfiric, где обсуждение ваших массовых правок остановок с российским сообществом?

вы допускаете массовые ошибки, заменяете stop_position на platform (например https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9896957681),

массово расставляете теги bus=yes и public_transport=platform на всех остановках подряд (явно не учитывая, что часть остановок может не использоваться в данный момент и существовать только как физический объект без использования в маршрутах)
mavl (2024-07-30 10:16:48+00:00): @literan  
Участник сейчас временно заблокирован и не сможет ответить.  
  
@Zenfiric  
Please, contact Data Working Group.
Zenfiric (2024-07-30 17:10:33+00:00): Вот немного более подробная версия:

Я искренне извиняюсь перед всем сообществом за беспорядок, вызванный этими изменениями. Благодарю пользователя @mavl за оперативный откат правок и восстановление порядка. Я заверяю, что такие ситуации больше не повторятся и буду более осторожен в будущем.
literan (2024-07-30 17:17:53+00:00):  Zenfiric, главное - сначала обсуждайте массовые правки с сообществом (например, на форумах https://community.openstreetmap.org/ )
gscscnd (2024-07-31 14:12:12+00:00): Już to przerabialiśmy. highway=residential nie ma nic wspólnego z drogą gminną. Narutowicza powinna być unclassified.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/pytania-poczatkujacych/52707/5934
emersonveenstra (2024-08-02 19:05:30+00:00): You added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304601330 with no tags, please fix it
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-07-30 10:12:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154598512 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by user that refuses to play by the rules; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16512
eggie (2024-07-30 14:57:47+00:00): Dag RpdeJong

Er loopt momenteel een draadje over dit onderwerp.
De bushaltes wil men op een andere manier mappen.
Leo Slager had deze halte net voor jou bewerkt.
Volgens mij hoort de operator niet op de bushalte. Die hoort op de relatie.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-07-30 14:59:24+00:00): Kijk anders even hier
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/algemeen-openbaar-vervoer-nl-topic/7050/155

en je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=154594373

Groet
eggie
Leo Slager (2024-07-30 20:26:58+00:00): Het is een heel aparte bushalte:
De halte staat niet in de dienstregeling van de busmaatschappij.
De halte is niet aangemeld in het nationale haltebestand van de busmaatschappijen.
De naam Veerhaven kan niet juist zijn: de veerhaven bevindt zich aan de W-zijde van het eiland en niet hier. Het lijkt er dus op dat met die naam de eind-bestemming van de busdienst wordt weergegeven.

Kortom: iemand heeft hier een eigen haltebord neergezet op zijn particuliere grondstuk.

Het bord staat er en kan dus ook op de kaart worden gezet.
Maar alles anders is dus niet juist.
Deze halte opnemen in de routerelatie leidt dan weer tot foutmeldingen.

Overigens heeft Eggie gelijk:
Een bushalte staat op gemeente grond en kan door meerdere busmaatschappijen worden aangedaan.
De operator=  hoort dan ook thuis op de routerelatie.

Tenslotte: 
Ga met de editor iD geen routerelaties bewerken, dat leidt alleen maar tot fouten in de volgorde van haltes en wegen in die routerelatie. Als je serieus met OV routes aan de gang wilt gaan, stap dan over naar de editor JOSM.

Ik pas even wat aan.
Rodejong (2024-07-30 22:48:23+00:00): De naam Veerhaven zou gelinked moeten worden aan het huis verder op dat die naam draagt. Dus niet letterlijk de veerhaven.
Waarom die halte daar staat? Nachtbus? Flex taxi? Bus fan die graag een bushalte wilde? Ik weet het niet. Het is idd een vreemde eend in de bijt.
Leo Slager (2024-07-31 13:26:59+00:00): Excuses, dat had ik dus helemaal over het hoofd gezien.
ik pas het even aan.
rskedgell (2024-07-30 09:26:22+00:00): You DO know who reverted it. You could and should have read the changeset comment. Please DO NOT implement temporary closures in this way - use conditional restrictions. If you can't work out how to do that, tough, don't edit the map at all.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154343962
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-07-30 10:12:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154598512 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by user that refuses to play by the rules; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16512
rskedgell (2024-07-30 09:21:23+00:00): The tag for that is motor_vehicle=private

There are separate tagging schemes for parking, but that would involve actually reading a wiki page.
rskedgell (2024-07-30 09:38:46+00:00): Guess what: I don't believe you.

The restriction was created by The Buckinghamshire County Council (Bletchley Pus Station) (No Entry Except Buses) Order 1985. There is no corresponding order revoking that.

"The effect of the Order, which will come into operation on 29th July 1985, is to prohibit any vehicle other than a bus, coach, contract bus express carnage, school bus works bus or security vehicle proceeding in Saxon Street from entering Bletchley Bus Station.

Exemptions in the Order relate to building operations removal of obstructions maintenance of the road sewers pipes, telegraph lines, fire bngade, police and ambulance duties immediate emergency maintenance work on a defective vehicle and in pursuance of statutory powers."

The correct tagging of the above is:
vehicle=no + bus=yes + motor_vehicle=private + emergency=yes
(emergency=yes is often omitted, since it is taken for granted that emergency services can go wherever they need).

https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/50210/page/10337
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-07-30 10:12:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154598512 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by user that refuses to play by the rules; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16512
rskedgell (2024-07-30 09:37:18+00:00): Guess what: I don't believe you.

The restriction was created by The Buckinghamshire County Council (Bletchley Pus Station) (No Entry Except Buses) Order 1985. There is no corresponding order revoking that.

"The effect of the Order, which will come into operation on 29th July 1985, is to prohibit any vehicle other than a bus, coach, contract bus express carnage, school bus
works bus or security vehicle proceeding in Saxon Street from entering Bletchley Bus Station.

Exemptions in the Order relate to building operations removal of obstructions maintenance of the road sewers pipes, telegraph lines, fire bngade, police and ambulance
duties immediate emergency maintenance work on a defective vehicle and in pursuance! of statutory powers."

The correct tagging of the above is:
vehicle=no + bus=yes + motor_vehicle=private + emergency=yes
(emergency=yes is often omitted, since it is taken for granted that emergency services can go wherever they need).

https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/50210/page/10337
ivanbranco (2024-07-31 19:26:00+00:00): Hi Remyfasol, thanks for the edits, but please consider using more meaningful changeset descriptions, "f" is not a good comment, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
rskedgell (2024-07-30 12:35:19+00:00): In a case like this, it might be worth using an appropriate lifecycle prefix on the highway=* tag (possibly combined with a note=* and/or check_date=* tags) rather than deletion, otherwise someone will probably re-add them.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Zouche (2024-07-30 13:15:16+00:00): Thank you for your feedback. I've done as you suggested.
pavvv (2024-07-30 09:47:15+00:00): Could you please provide a source of this object (POI)?
jbcharron (2024-07-31 16:30:08+00:00): Bonjour,
Attention tout le terrain de ne sera pas les Studios de Reims seul 50 hectares le seront et à mon avis ce sera les hangars en bas à droite de la centrale solaire de Total.
Une zone en construction serait plus adaptée.
Bonne soirée
Julien39 (2024-08-24 09:31:45+00:00): Bonjour,
Les hangars en bas à gauche (au sud-ouest) vous voulez dire ?
50 hectares, cela fait quand même une sacrée surface...
N'hésite pas à corriger comme tu penses être bien. Ce sera de toute façon à repréciser lorsque le projet sera dévoilé.
Bonne journée
jbcharron (2024-08-24 11:27:33+00:00): Merci pour ton retour
J'ai retiré le alt_name de la base aérienne et j'ai ajouté un landuse=construction autour des 3 gros hangars à proximité de la centrale solaire
Bonne journée
Julien39 (2024-08-24 13:05:10+00:00): Très bien, merci !
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-30 10:00:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768827917

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Đuro Jiří (2024-07-30 13:06:40+00:00): Questa modifica è completa sbagliata, perché da Via Crosere si può passare anche a piedi verso sud. Non si può passare verso nord (esiste cartello stradale), però verso sud si. Qui c'è problema che la navigazione non te lascia passare sulla bicicletta sulla strada mappata come trunk. Stesso vale anche per Tangenziale di Portogruaro,di Cittadella che hai mappato come trunk.
Đuro Jiří (2024-07-30 13:29:18+00:00): Corretto
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-07-30 10:12:09+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 154594336, 154594600, 154595269, 154595315.
joost schouppe (2024-08-07 07:28:43+00:00): amenity=school + school=kindergarten is just amenity=kindergarten :)
But according to the official data, this is both kindergarten+primary https://www.odwb.be/explore/dataset/signaletique-fase/map/?location=19,50.40691,4.44194
Note that info about this school is missing on the Notre Dame website...
djsa (2024-08-07 10:19:43+00:00): Fair enough, well spotted. Overall very confusing bunch of locations, all falling under the same(ish) school, tried to glean as much info as possible from their site (mission failed, haha).
joost schouppe (2024-08-07 11:33:16+00:00): It's very confusing indeed, and their website isn't very helpful
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-16 08:00:37+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12082800367/history has fixme:type = parking that was added in this edit
Is it a parking for cars? (amenity=parking)
for bicycles? (amenity=bicycle_parking)
Something else?
FajrAl (2025-11-29 23:17:40+00:00): Tidak direkomendasikan menggunakan jalan dan sungai sebagai bagian dari relasi batas administrasi. Akan ada kesulitan di kemudian hari dalam memperbaruinya.
bergfrei (2024-09-28 16:05:34+00:00): Hallo m4c3o,
du hast bei dem Änderungssatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154599857
bicycle/foot von "designated" auf "yes" geändert. Ist das entsprechende Verkehrszeichen DE:240 am Ortsausgang Bad Waldsee entfernt worden? 
siehe auch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:bicycle=designated
Falls nicht, bitte entsprechend den Vorgaben wieder rückgängig machen.

Fragende Grüße

bergfrei
m4c3o (2024-09-29 17:25:18+00:00): Hallo bergfrei, 

nein, das Schild ist bestimmt weiterhin da. habe es dann nur falsch abgeändert (aus Unwissenheit). 

Danke für den Hinweis
Viele Grüße
Hufkratzer (2024-07-30 20:46:06+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304626409 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304619079 don't look like horse riding centres (tag leisure=horse_riding), they look like horse riding arenas (leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian); like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175755945;
See also:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351529199 (example)
Hunkerz (2024-11-03 19:07:36+00:00): Thank you for your message. I did not realise there was the arena option. I will change that now. 
By why didn't you change this yourself?
Hufkratzer (2024-11-03 22:22:46+00:00): I already changed them 3 months ago, 12 days after I posted my first comment here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155121579)
VLD549 (2024-08-20 12:28:27+00:00): Hi, could you explain the name change from Warche to 'Die Warche' ? According to Wikipedia it's only 'Warche'.

Thank you in advance!
VLD549 (2024-09-11 14:44:05+00:00): Hi, can someone respond please? Thank you.
bxl-forever (2024-09-16 18:46:23+00:00): @VDL549: Many rivers in OSM have an article prefix.  Die means "The".

Incidently, the wikipedia article is named "Warche" because all wikipedia articles use the canonical form, but the text starts with "Die Warche".
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warche

Take a loot ak this one: name is "La Meuse" despite the Wikipedia article will use the short version, i.e. "Meuse".
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1075197

"name=La Seine" in Paris, same situation.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/677465328

There is nothing wrong about this, this is just a convention.
VLD549 (2024-09-20 15:10:54+00:00): Ok, thank you.
look4book (2026-06-25 11:11:16+00:00): Hallo Schirinowski - würdest Du bitte nochmal nach den Tracks am großen Pätschsee schauen? Das Luftbild gibt so garnichts her, daß da ein zweispuriges FZ fährt (=track) .
SomeoneElse (2024-07-30 12:09:31+00:00): (to save anyone looking) the change to the E15 was the removal of a couple of nodes that were in there in error - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/103222/history/1025 .  A couple of Scottish roundabouts are still in there in error.
jqngarcia (2024-07-30 18:06:27+00:00): Ok, he borrado algunos nodos erroneos en el ultimo cambio, subo otro, trasladandolos de la superuta a la ruta de Escocia

Salud y Mapas, JQN
sembelst134 (2026-05-18 21:40:15+00:00): Hallo, 
hier wurde eine Fahrradstraße eingezeichnet - erinnerst du dich/kannst du bitte vor Ort die Beschilderung gegenprüfen, weil so ist es noch unvollständig getaggt.
Ohne Zusatzzeichen bedeutet DE:244.1:
bicycle_road=yes
vehicle=no
bicycle=designated
maxspeed=30
source:maxspeed=DE:bicycle_road
traffic_sign=DE:244.1
(segregated entfällt)
Danke im Voraus
lefou (2026-05-19 08:53:05+00:00): Die Frage ist, ob da noch Zusatzzeichen waren. Muss ich wohl nochmal hin fahren und vor Ort prüfen.
sembelst134 (2026-05-19 09:48:22+00:00): Ohne Zusatzzeichen wären zumindest rechtlich gesehen die Kleingartenbesitzer nicht berechtigt mit Auto vorzufahren.
Ich habs mir zumindest auch mal als to-do zum checken für meine Fahrradroutenplanung vorgemerkt, mal sehen wann ich dazu komme
sembelst134 (2026-05-26 06:48:55+00:00): Also an der östlichen Zufahrt war ich gestern mal schauen, und habe dem entsprechend gemappt.
Nur am Spohlaer Weg müsste die Beschilderung nochmal überprüft werden, insbesondere ab der Brücke, denn ich bezweifle dass dort die Kombi DE:237 mit Fußgänger frei steht
Supaplex030 (2024-08-01 19:30:42+00:00): Hallo momabebra, diese Änderung musste ich teils zurücksetzen, denn einmal mehr scheinst du hier unnötigerweise eine Einfahrt gelöscht zu haben, die sicherlich noch existiert.
lg, Alex
StefanHRT (2024-07-30 12:21:18+00:00): Hallo momabebra, Warum löscht du sämtliche Grundstückszufahrten, welche für Deine neu angelegten Bürgersteige auch potentielle Crosssings im Routing wären? Zudem gilt vor den Grundstückszufahrten eigentlich auch Parkverbot. VG
Supaplex030 (2024-08-01 19:36:19+00:00): Habe die Änderungen überwiegend zurückgesetzt.
Soshal Distan Singh (2025-04-25 02:50:09+00:00): Геометрия зданий стала хуже (менее точной), tunnel=building_passage не отмечен как положено, да ещё и зачем-то удалили входы в здания (а ведь человек на местности побывал и эти данные собрал, это со снимка не срисуешь (панорамы есть далеко не везде)):
 • https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10795337397/history#map=19/59.943791/30.261811
 • https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10795337396/history#map=19/59.943791/30.261811
 • https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10795337401/history#map=19/59.943791/30.261811
 • https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10795337400/history#map=19/59.943791/30.261811

Нужно тщательнее снимки выбирать. Я понимаю, нормальных нет, всё вокруг отрисовано криво (редактировать - тот ещё гемор), но нельзя же так...
OSMchik (2025-04-28 07:40:49+00:00): Ошибки понял, учту, спасибо
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-30 12:30:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8197858981
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304635138

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Supaplex030 (2024-08-01 19:41:07+00:00): Teils zurückgesetzt, siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154603363
ivanbranco (2024-08-10 21:42:32+00:00): Ciao voschix,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304638112/history/1

questa way che avevi mappato é stata cancellata. Hai avuto modo di sopralluogarla di persona? Se sì, ti ricordi se é pubblica o privata?

Se esiste davvero andrebbe ripristinata, e se fosse privata andrebbe aggiunto access=private.

Grazie e buon mapping :)
voschix (2024-08-11 11:10:55+00:00): Mi aveva scritto il proprietario/mappatore separatamente. Avevo messo io la way basandomi sulla  Global Heatmap di Strava e conoscendo l'inizio e ala fine del percorso. Se quello che dice è corretto, ha dei problemi con person che passano nonostante segnaletica di divieto, anche a piedi.  Ha rimosso lui la way, giustamente, ma per mio avviso sarebbe meglio di farla vedere sulla mappa, ma con access=private.
silversurfer83 (2024-07-30 14:44:46+00:00): Hi :)

kleiner Tipp für rechteckige und runde Objekte: Wenn du das Objekt eingezeichnet hast und die Eigenschaften vergeben hast kannst du mit der Taste "Q" das Objekt sauber rechtwinklig machen. Dann sehen die meisten Häuser auch hübscher aus. Wenn in der Realität natürlich nicht rechtwinklig sind, bitte nicht machen. Es hilft übrigens hier in Hessen, wenn du beim Häuser zeichenen das Hintergrundbild auf ALKIS umstellst (wo du häufig auch die Hausnummer findest).

Bei runden Objekten funktioniert das mit der Taste "O" wie Oskar.

Weiter viel Spaß

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154604765
Binnette (2024-10-15 16:31:12+00:00): Merci d'avoir ajouter cette boîte à livres 😇👍
bxl-forever (2024-07-30 13:26:01+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for the effort of adding some data.

If you want to add places, please:
* Create separate nodes
* Do not change tags for the building or for existing address points → leave them alone
* Use full URL with scheme and trailing slash: "cm1414.be" should be https://www.cm1414.be/

Thanks in advance.
ha dem (2024-07-30 17:44:33+00:00): there are no changes to be made to the note. it has been created in a simplified manner as we have no other information available.

In most cases, if the addresses are registered without the 3w, clicking on the url will redirect you to the 3w if necessary. 

only the category would not be the right one as it is a multi-discipline ‘medical house’.
Flynn Marquardt (2024-07-30 17:39:59+00:00): Hello,
this way is still broken: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/133131085#map=14/40.7098/45.3993

As a result the several broders are broken ...

Are you sure that you reverted to stable state?
empty_child (2024-07-30 19:17:12+00:00): Looks like an amount of changes overlaid each other. Will try to fix
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-30 13:10:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5278063157
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9146863105
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304643980
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1077448110

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-09 18:44:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304644528/history - są jakiekolwiek ślady tego w terenie?

jak tak to gdzie i jakie?
muralito (2024-07-31 03:23:49+00:00): Hola. Mira que no en todos lados que ves verde hay cañadas, y si unis las que son afluentes y corren en sentido distinto se arma relajo y empiezan a aparecer errores por las incoherencias. No es un tema unicamente del dibujo, sino que los cursos de agua vayan a desembocar donde realmente corresponde.
muralito (2024-07-31 03:26:29+00:00): Que relajo quedo aca. El agua no sube. Podes usar el opentopomap para chequear.
muralito (2024-07-31 03:31:32+00:00): Hace unos dias corregi centenas de minipoligonos de natural=wood que lo usabas para mapear un solo arbol, y puse los arboles uno por uno, y ahora volviste a agregar todo. No entiendo, en un monte el natural=wood esta bien, pero no es esa la forma que se mapean los arboles individuales.
eggie (2024-07-30 14:41:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Je kunt helaas geen gebouwen uitlijnen mbv een schuin genomen luchtfoto en/of conform de daken  Ik heb het gebouw nu opnieuw uitgelijnd mbv de BGT. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community