piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
VLD0251 (2026-01-19 15:16:42+00:00): Hello. A chalet is indicated here (Node 13427489401), but it does not appear on any of the available satellite layers (Maxar, Bing, Esri). Is this a recent construction confirmed on the ground, or a positioning error? Thank you for checking!
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-25 03:16:05+00:00): DWG revert - apparent undiscussed import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177667698
LordGarySugar (2026-01-03 06:26:30+00:00): 👀
BubbaJuice (2026-02-11 20:44:26+00:00): Was this discussed? thanks
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-02-12 03:27:30+00:00): Yes, kind of. After a user downgraded trunk 𝘀𝘁𝘂𝗯𝘀 to primary, I decided to sort of recreate the trunk roads while forming a coherent network. That same user then told me that these roads are actually (relatively local) arterials rather than being important cross-country/state highways.
BubbaJuice (2026-02-12 03:45:49+00:00): 4 years ago me and another mapper made these trunk based on traffic numbers. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109601263 & https://pag.public.ms2soft.com/tcds/tsearch.asp. These roads are built up because they carry a large amount of cars. In our proposal, these were made trunk to distinguish between major arterials (tagged as primary) and these high-capacity, built up roads. I'm hoping we can shift these back to trunk but I'm open to discussion.

Thanks,
BubbaJuice
Frans S (2026-01-03 11:48:39+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping. 

D: Connecting nodes to other features.

E: Buildings not squared or rounded. (not a single one  75  !)


Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176763000
Frans S (2026-01-03 11:49:20+00:00): Please stick to the requirements. Just map buildings. nothing else.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176763000
Cybermanx (2026-01-02 22:47:20+00:00): Reverted. was testing the tool, i didn't think it would upload straight away to OSM. i saved the route so all that work isn't for nothing

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176764057
Tris_1220 (2026-01-02 23:08:29+00:00): note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5068380
Glassman (2026-01-04 03:16:22+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176764757
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-03 10:03:41+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap!

In this and some of your recent changesets, you’ve added a large number of features that appear to share very similar tagging. Could you please tell us more about the source of this data and how it was collected? Specifically, I’d like to understand whether this was a data import or derived from an external dataset.

If an external source was used, could you also confirm that its licence is compatible with OpenStreetMap’s ODbL requirements?

Best regards,
Pascal

#DataImport
genityves (2026-01-05 23:56:15+00:00): I'm only mapping structures that are visible from aerial imagery (usually Esri or Bing, which are embedded into JOSM). You can also see the used background maps in the source tag of the changesets.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-04 07:23:38+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3285092018
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1463812723

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-03 19:49:18+00:00): gdzie edycja wykonywana jest to widać - w opisie zmian lepiej napisz jakiego rodzaju zmiany robisz
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-04 07:44:03+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1463813101

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-04 08:01:56+00:00): PMed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/messages/1319050
AndyB_66 (2026-01-04 10:38:07+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
JuanElDemografo (2026-03-10 03:33:37+00:00): Hi after a recent discussion on wiki, we decided to change the camera:power=* tagging to the preexisting tagging electricity=*. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurveillance for the specifics.
SomeoneElse (2026-01-03 00:46:33+00:00): (and accidentially a fence near Amotherby)
therealsl!mshady (2026-05-21 21:31:52+00:00): Test comment
therealsl!mshady (2026-05-21 21:59:41+00:00): Test comment 2
Glassman (2026-01-04 03:17:08+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176765917
Gabe DeFreitas (2026-01-03 03:41:19+00:00): Hello! I disagree with your change of subway operator from NYCTA to MTA. NYCTA is the operating agency of the subway and most buses in NYC. Since 1968, it has been an affiliate of and controlled by the MTA. However, it continues to have a distinct legal existence. I believe it is more accurate to tag the operator as NYCTA, which mirrors the situation that exists with Metro-North and LIRR, which also list the operating agency rather than MTA.
Supaplex (2026-01-03 01:19:40+00:00): Hi
Can you seperated your changeset into 2, making it more reviewable by other mappers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176765981
canoncaesar (2026-01-03 16:27:46+00:00): Hello,
I'm sorry. I don't understand what is happening. I added a deli, and I am new to the OpenStreetMap community. What would I separate into 2?
felipeeugenio (2026-01-03 16:45:34+00:00): Hola. por favor solo nombres oficiales. no descripciones. Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176766041
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-04 07:44:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1200569726
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101430575

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-05 04:44:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1200569726
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101430575

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
flohoff (2026-01-03 07:38:47+00:00): Good catch - routing war hier kaputt.

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=1011225,1189470
bielebog (2026-01-03 12:28:35+00:00): Der Bereich ist auch gerade frisch für den allgemeinen Verkehr wieder freigegeben. Da waren noch gesperrte Segmente übrig geblieben.
felipeeugenio (2026-01-03 16:45:05+00:00): Hola. Es dudoso que la máxima sea 30 en todo ese tramo. Quizás se trata de un error y solo corresponde al sector de curvas, con lo que sería útil cortal la vía en pedazos.

Lo otro que es útil es agregar la sñalética que marca las velocidades con traffic_sign=maxspeed + maxspeed=XX.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176766870
Glassman (2026-01-04 03:18:35+00:00): #TIP: When removing a closed business, leave the address since it will likely be reused in the future.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176766992
VictorIE (2026-03-18 10:36:09+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8402595529/

What does fixme=celbo mean? :)
Brían (2026-03-18 11:39:12+00:00): Hi, I added this as a note to myself to know which nodes I edited, and I usually remove it before uploading the data, but I forgot to do it here. I'll get rid of it now.
VictorIE (2026-03-18 14:26:33+00:00): Ah.

iD has an option for "Highlight Changes" that makes the object glow like a light sabre in Star Wars. I wonder if Vespucci has something similar. :)
danieldegroot2 (2026-03-21 20:49:30+00:00): Vespucci does not seem to have a hotkey to higlight changed/edited objects. (nor does Go Map!! editor)

Before uploading changes, entries on the list of the created, changed and deleted elements can be selected and the actual changes inspected. Elements that have failed the validator tests will have a red icon displayed.
You can choose to upload only some objects but not others.

The info display for selected elements will show the original state of the element side by side with the current state if the element has been modified. (as of v11 / 2018)
The review modal will be retained even if a previous element version is selected. (as of v21.2 / 2025) It is planned to allow opening it in a separate window (useful for tablets).

You can choose to save a JOSM / OSC file locally(, clear data, do other edits, upload them), open the file later and resume the previous session as such.
If you save a JOSM / OSC file, load it and select a changed object, it will return "Element has been modified, but there is no local prior state to compare to" (as of 2025-06). It is planned to add augmented diffs so some history becomes available.

If you have left a changeset open after an upload, you can close it before the next upload with an option in the upload dialog. (as of v14 / 2019)

In the properties panel, changed/autofilled keys/values are not highlighted, as it requires much memory and storage. It is not planned to do so currently, as it is a major change (to the requirements).

If needed, you can create todos. See
[Notes, Bugs and Todos](https://vespucci.io/help/en/Introduction/#notes-bugs-and-todos)
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-04 07:43:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12153785276
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1463833203

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2026-01-03 07:38:48+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 54 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/892590685 v22 | 33 crossings
https://osm.org/way/892590687 v17 | 21 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/6612452801 v3
https://osm.org/node/6612452818 v3
https://osm.org/node/8295979594 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176767385
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-03 07:56:26+00:00): IMHO at least the following way should be reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1463835569
Mlvln (2026-01-03 14:35:16+00:00): Hello Pingvin40,
are you sure that there is a sidewalk there? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1463840809
The highway line is tagged with sidewalk:left=no and the only sidewalk I can see on current local aerial imagery ends at the crossing node at house 10A. From there I can only see a grass shoulder.
Thank you 
Mlvln
user_5359 (2026-01-03 09:04:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/8668738445 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I had to revert your change set.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-23 23:08:38+00:00): Merged apparent duplicate HVAC POIs both added by this SEO account in changeset/183086899

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183086899
Frank Peng (2026-01-03 07:21:35+00:00): Why did you delete a valid road behind R&R Market? I can personally verify that the road still exists: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/737322981

If the road behind R&R Market still exists, then you could've spilt the way and tagged one section of the road as highway=service + surface=unpaved. (To split a way in the iD editor, click on the way, right-click on one of the nodes of the way where you would like to split the way, click on the scissors icon (the Split option), and it splits the way. You can also split a way by clicking on one of the nodes on the way and then pressing X on your keyboard to split the way.) Please do not delete existing valid map elements on OSM and redraw them anew. It is against good practices on OSM to do that. Please just modify the existing map elements by adjusting their geometry or changing its tags. You have been warned about this numerous times, yet you still have not complied with OSM good practices.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Frank Peng (2026-01-03 07:29:42+00:00): Also, when other mappers comment on any of your changesets, you must almost always respond, even if that answer might be I don't know or you fixed the issues yourself. Public communication between mappers is crucial to building trust. Edits of people who never respond may be treated as less trustworthy. Unresponsive users who continue questionable edits despite being contacted multiple times first get a warning (so-called 0-day block), then progressively longer blocks on their account.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Someone_commented_on_my_changeset,_what_should_I_do?
Frank Peng (2026-01-05 01:48:35+00:00): In your future edits on OSM, please comply with OSM good practices.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
Frank Peng (2026-01-06 08:09:39+00:00): ***Corrected Comment***:
Also, when other mappers comment on any of your changesets, you must almost always respond, even if that answer might be "I don't know" or you fixed the issues yourself. Public communication between mappers is crucial to building trust. Edits of people who never respond may be treated as less trustworthy. Unresponsive users who continue questionable edits despite being contacted multiple times first get a warning (so-called 0-day block), then progressively longer blocks on their account.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Someone_commented_on_my_changeset,_what_should_I_do
San Jose Heating & Cooling1 (2026-01-03 04:41:44+00:00): https://maps.app.goo.gl/1SUjbzJ3LNgEDMYc7
http://hvacrefrigeration.site/
admin@hvacservicespro.site
https://www.facebook.com/people/1080-HVAC/61585442905757/
https://www.instagram.com/hvac.and.refrigeration/
https://www.tiktok.com/@1080hvacrefrigeration
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/1108870739516055276/
https://www.youtube.com/@1080HVACREFRIGERATION
https://x.com/1080HVAC
1080 HVAC & REFRIGERATION
863 Salt Lake Ct
San Jose
California
95133
(408) 201-9005
HVAC Contractor, HVAC Repair, HVAC Installation, HVAC Maintenance, Air Conditioning Repair, Heating Repair, Refrigeration Services, Commercial HVAC, Residential HVAC, HVAC Company, Refrigeration Repair, Refrigeration Installation, Walk-In Cooler Repair, Walk-In Freezer Services, Industrial Refrigeration Services
San Jose - Heating & Cooling Solutions

San Jose - Heating &
Efficiency in terms of energy is paramount in cutting down operating expenditures. 1080 HVAC & REFRIGERATION provides energy-efficient HVAC and refrigeration systems in San Jose, California.
We incorporate the installation of modern, high-efficiency HVAC, commercial refrigeration units, and thermostats that help to optimize the consumption of energy. Our services ensure money savings and enhanced comfort.
Our San Jose air conditioning and heating professionals assist our valued customers in making informed, environment-friendly modifications.
iandees (2026-01-03 15:19:36+00:00): Reverting spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176786145
AndyB_66 (2026-01-03 10:51:28+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
vng_me (2026-01-04 02:58:52+00:00): Revert this changeset because natural=coastlines are broken.

Please, read OSM wiki about coastlines and use JOSM editor + Validator where they are affected.
Supaplex (2026-01-03 14:59:22+00:00): The changeset spread across half the world, might have to split to at least 3 changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176769607
Supaplex (2026-01-03 15:01:49+00:00): The changeset spread across half the world, might have to split to at least 3 changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176769607
NeisBot (2026-01-03 07:38:55+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 15 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/569805308 v4 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5479314583 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176769712
NeisBot (2026-01-04 07:05:26+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/37851178 v11 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/3924039858 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176770606
NeisReview (2026-01-17 16:35:44+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/176814041
ieguy3 (2026-01-03 07:27:00+00:00): there is a median under the bridge on bundy canyon
SeaB33 (2026-01-03 07:28:08+00:00): hello! i tried to map this terrace house (16 and 18) which is one building but with connected walls, struggled to map it :(
literan (2026-01-03 14:25:53+00:00): проектируемый проезд, улица, прпоспект и т.п. надо писать с маленькой буквы
TheSwavu (2026-01-03 08:44:45+00:00): Hi, 

You seem to have added two identical AEDs at this location. I have deleted one.

Happy mapping.
rarad74 (2026-01-03 14:14:09+00:00): Salut. Recomand imaginile de la ESRI standard. Sunt mai bine centrate. Si poti folosi tasta q dupa desenarea cladii pentru a aduce toate unghiurile la 90 de grade.
NeisBot (2026-01-04 07:08:27+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13428139509 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Balloon decoration service in Rohini Delhi NCR"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-17 16:40:23+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177343422
ieguy3 (2026-01-03 08:04:14+00:00): its been there for a while. not sure why it was changed back to stop sign
NeisBot (2026-01-04 07:05:29+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/767321841 v1 | 7 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7164407688 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176772054
NeisReview (2026-01-17 16:35:44+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/176849659
eggie (2026-01-03 08:37:25+00:00): Dag Wouter,

Een tijdelijke afsluiting wordt meestal met conditional getagd. Er zijn nu een aantal routerelaties geblokkeerd.
Bv access:conditional=no @ (2025 Sep 20-2026 Apr 03)

Je zou dus uit kunnen zoeken tot hoelang dit gaat duren. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-03 08:40:29+00:00): 
M268651: Weemselerweg Albergen Herinrichting / onderhoud van Brug Weemselerbrug vervangen
Tubbergen
25-08-2024 08:00 t/m 31-03-2026 00:00
eggie (2026-01-03 08:49:48+00:00): Dit heeft wel lang geduurd.
Omdat de brug over niet te lange tijd weer opengaat heb ik de conditionaltags toegevoegd. = no @ (2024 Aug 25-2026 Mrt 31)
Je tagging had toch niet heholpen. In zo'n geval moet je de weg zelf op construction zetten. Niet alleen de brug.
Dus highway=construction
construction=unclassified. Dat zou ik in dit geval niet meer doen, want dan zit je straks met een gemankeerde kaart.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-03 08:33:55+00:00): Dag Wouter. Ik heb foot=yes toegevoegd. Er lopen hier twee wandelroutes. Wellicht is er een mogelijkheid om over te stappen?

MVG
eggie
wouternieuwerth (2026-01-03 13:33:57+00:00): Hi Eggie, 

Dat lijkt me prima. Wandelaars kunnen er vast overheen. Ik kwam hier op de fiets langs en het was echt duidelijk niet de bedoeling dat fietsers hierlangs ouden gaan.

Vriendelijke groet,
Wouter
eggie (2026-01-03 13:39:25+00:00): Lijkt me ook. Een eindje verder is ook een overstap ingetekend. ..vehicle=no heb ik ook bijgetagd.
Gr eggie
AndyB_66 (2026-01-03 10:49:13+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
TrickyFoxy (2026-02-02 10:58:00+00:00): На снимках тут кусты https://osm.org/node/13428183101 Что вы имели в виду?
eggie (2026-01-03 09:46:55+00:00): Dag Wouter. Het is niet correct wat je doet. Je tagt voor de router, maar die hoort zicht te confirmeren aan de routingafspraken binnen OSM.

Wanneer het niet werkt op een footway of cycleway zul je dus contact moeten opnemen met Wandrer.
Dit zijn gewoon default tags. 

Op een highway=path is het wek verstandig om foot=yes en bicycle=yes/no toe te voegen als info dat je een survey hebt gedaan.
Maar ook op een path is foot=yes default.
MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2026-01-03 12:22:09+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, SANNIN.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added houses"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
Taya_S (2026-01-29 08:56:39+00:00): Reverted unexplained boundary edit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177837034