piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Anonymous897234 (2025-06-11 20:05:01+00:00): There is a bit of a hierarchy in the neighborhoods of Seattle.

Next one I was thinking of was Queen Anne, which is a superset of North Queen Anne, East Queen Anne, West Queen Anne, and Lower Queen Anne. Less wishy-washy.

Unsure if 'quarter' is the right level; 'suburb' might be better, to match Ballard: https://openstreetmap.org/node/150940157. Impact is choosing a larger level down-weights matches in the geocoder.

Wikipedia lists the "district" each neighborhood is within: 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_neighborhoods_in_Seattle#List_of_districts_and_neighborhoods. For example Whittier Heights "neighborhood" is in Ballard "district": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whittier_Heights,_Seattle. 

For areas vs. points, the points are much easier to create. When creating the area for the quarter/suburb, you have to have include the individual ways, as you can't have a relation (e.g. West Queen Anne, East Queen Anne, ...) in a type=boundary relation, to easily make a union of the individual neighborhoods.

For example, Ballard Sculpture Garden is in the east part of Ballard, but Nominatim, by necessity, makes an assumption about how large the POI point for Ballard is, so lists it in Fremont instead of (neighborhood=West Woodland, suburb=Ballard): https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=N&osmid=3211770267

Overall goal is to help searchability for locations, like "Coffee in Queen Anne", by giving a better bounds to the geocoders.
BCNorwich (2025-06-10 11:59:59+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The pharmacy was already mapped, so I've removed the second POI.

Regards Bernard.
ilias_ (2025-06-10 13:15:42+00:00): You're still marking buildings as higher than others, please stop doing that, I left a comment here osm.org/changeset/167305156
pwbriggs (2025-06-15 02:34:46+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Is this a separate storefront than "side pro exteriors"?
Father Nature Landscapes of Tacoma (2025-06-19 09:29:24+00:00): Yes
pwbriggs (2025-06-19 22:38:39+00:00): Okay, thanks for the info. They both link to the same Facebook, so I was wondering if these two associated shops are different.
user_5359 (2025-06-11 10:07:52+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/44957980. What is the mean of the tag OSBB = Лівобережний-К?
Кріц (2025-06-12 10:08:24+00:00): Hi, OSBB - Homeowners association (Об'єднання співвласників багатоквартирного будинку)
andygol (2025-06-12 14:10:57+00:00): @Кріц, I may suggest to take a look at using `operator=*` tag instead.
Кріц (2025-06-12 17:45:58+00:00): Добре, буду його використовувати, дякую за уточнення
eggie (2025-06-10 12:19:19+00:00): Dag Robin,

Zie hier het effect
https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=53.3287993&lon=6.7474617&zoom=19

MVG
eggie
Robin Flikkema (2025-06-10 12:24:05+00:00): @Eddie, dank! Ik ga nog even verder zoeken. Ben je het er dan ook mee eens dat veel gebouwen eigenlijk in delen zouden gesplitst moeten worden zodat het platte dak / schuine dak goed aangegeven wordt qua type en hoogte?
eggie (2025-06-10 12:30:13+00:00): De vorm van de BAG kun je beter niet aanpassen. Dan gaat het fout bij periodieke updates. Wel kun je met veschillende building:part=....  werken die je dan netjes in delen op de BAG grondvorm intekent.
Daar kun je dan de eigenschappen op zetten. 
Volgens mij kun dan ook rijtjeshuizen intekenen zodat de dakvorm klopt. Dat zal nu niet het geval zijn. Ik heb er verder weinig ervaring mee. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part

en
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/3D

en
https://osmbuildings.org/

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2025-06-10 12:31:30+00:00): Denk even hier kijken. https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.8376913&lon=4.6823966&zoom=19
Robin Flikkema (2025-06-13 15:04:37+00:00): Hoi Eggie, anderen,

Ik heb het e.e.a. bijgewerkt en f4map is nu ook bijgewerkt met die wijzigingen. Blijkbaar heeft dat een cache à 1 dag.

Als je nog even wilt zien hoe t wordt: https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=53.3285847&lon=6.7474886&zoom=19&camera.phi=-6.011

De rest moet/ga ik nog fixen, maar was eerst even benieuwd wat het resultaat werd voordat ik aldoor alles bijwerk.
Ik moet toegeven dat het shape/angle stukje van roof soms wat lastig is, en het soms even trail en error vergt; maar al doende leert men!

Dank voor al je feedback! Ook dank voor het delen van een andere wijk! Ik hem inmiddels een paar plekken gevonden met nuttige voorbeelden! 
T.z.t. zal ik even kijken of ik wat "lessons learned" ergens kan delen!
eggie (2025-06-13 15:11:08+00:00): Leuk... pas op.. het is verslavend! 😀
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-06-11 07:47:11+00:00): Hi rahal2022, 
can you please fix https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12430378 and 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12430379 which are now broken after this changeset
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2025-06-11 09:46:22+00:00): تم استعادة هذه التغييرات وذلك لأنها تسببت في حذف وتغيير الحدود الإدارية، وأرجوا منكم إذا كان هناك تعديل أن يستند لمصدر وأيضا أن يتم بطريقة صحيحة لأن تحرير الحدود حساس ويحتاج لخبرة في ذلك ويفضل استخدام محرر مثل محرر جوسم لذلك، وقد يتسبب التعديل الغير صحيح لها في مشاكل في الخريطة
MrKrisKrisu (2025-06-12 09:35:41+00:00): reverted with #167525116
woodpeck (2025-06-10 11:41:27+00:00): Hallo ya04, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments beschreibt den Nutzen von Änderungssatzkommentaren in OSM. Bitte versuche doch, in Zukunft statt "Anpassung" zu schreiben, was Du warum angepasst hast.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-06-10 11:41:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3366879968
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/525403408
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/525701911
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/525701913
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/525701914
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/525701916
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/525701918

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Nakaner (2025-06-11 12:39:42+00:00): Hallo,

da diese Übergänge Andreaskreuze haben und die Bahn dort auf eigenem Bahnkörper verkehrt, halte ich die Änderung dort für falsch.

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167440303
MrKrisKrisu (2025-06-12 09:35:52+00:00): reverted with #167525132
stragu (2025-06-10 11:55:33+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167440939
NicolasGrosjean (2025-06-15 10:08:05+00:00): Bonjour Virgile,
Pour info, en créant un rond-point, tu as malheureusement créé un trou dans une relation de randonnée (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14182895#map=19/45.019223/5.650803), c'est désormais corrigé.
Merci d'avoir mis à jour M réso dans OSM !
SomeoneElse (2025-06-13 09:42:54+00:00): Hello,
Just wondered - is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13113383#map=16/51.80928/-0.03301 part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/31640#map=16/51.80928/-0.03301 (or does the main route continue along the canal, past the NCN milepost https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/160080113 )?
Best Regards,
Andy
Adam Edwards (2025-06-13 12:15:14+00:00): The Sustrans info is the official route is south of the primary school via Ware station and Crane Mead, but also the section along side the canal up to the High Street Bridge.  The tow path from High Street westwards has been delisted as it's very narrow with a very poor surface.  The section from Station Road to Viaduct road needs to be removed which I will do.
Adam Edwards (2025-06-13 12:18:25+00:00): I've removed the incorrect highlight from the northern section of Station Road.  I'm cycling here on Monday to add stick on signs where needed in my role as the local Sustrans Volunteer Coordinator.
Adam Edwards (2025-06-13 12:20:24+00:00): Should add this makes the mile post redundant.  You can see the Sustrans official routes here: https://www.sustrans.org.uk/national-cycle-network/
Adam Edwards (2025-06-13 12:21:41+00:00): A bit of context:  Sustrans reviewed it's routes four years ago and set higher safety standards for traffic and accessibility.  Routes which fail these tests have been deleted.
SomeoneElse (2025-06-13 12:53:22+00:00): Thanks for that!
Does that mean that the ways that are part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13113383 could perhaps be moved to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/31640 ?
There are a few other NCN routes that have several pieces like this (not for reasons of length), but I suspect that someone might consolidate them at some point.
The milepost (if it doesn't get moved) won't be the only one that's no longer 100% accurate after route moving / renaming!
Adam Edwards (2025-06-15 13:00:18+00:00): Yes, that makes sense although that relation needs editing.  NCN61 ends officially at Rye House, not Hoddesdon.  I'll have a go sorting that.  Off to ride the route tomorrow.
SomeoneElse (2025-06-29 13:37:12+00:00): Thanks!
bxl-forever (2025-06-10 12:29:12+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Nice to add new buildings.
In the future, please make sure to select the correct background, "Digitaal Vlaanderen GRB", which shows the correct outline of buildings, before tracing them.  Do not rely on aerial pictures for that.

I fixed the two buildings here.
literan (2025-06-10 19:49:45+00:00): забыли пробел в адресе. исправлю
literan (2025-06-10 19:51:58+00:00): а, так вы еще и поверх имеющихся зданий еще и сверху дубли нарисовали. Так не надо, откачу.
b-jazz (2025-06-11 05:01:40+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1393853203

As pointed out in a previous comment on one of your changes (http://osm.org/changeset/167156687), golf course elements like fairways, greens, water hazards and the like shouldn't intersect each other. That's one problem. Another is that you drew a fairway here when another fairway already existed. I'm not sure why you're doing that, but clearly that is not the right way to map something. Please see the previous comments and make sure you don't overlap elements in this and future changes to golf courses. Thanks.
mavl (2025-06-10 14:06:00+00:00): Здравствуйте. Названия улиц в OpenStreetMap указывают без сокращений с соответствии с соглашением (например, "Медовая улица").   
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1393854385  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
RedGreenBlue09 (2025-06-10 12:24:50+00:00): *Removed highway tag from relation.
streckenkundler (2025-06-10 13:09:18+00:00): Hei,

schaut euch in dem Zusammenhang bitte diese Meldung an: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4516722 So, wie ich das sehe, hat sich diese anonyme Meldung mit eurer Bearbeitung erledigt, richtig?

Danke, streckenkundler
dbsus (2025-06-10 14:18:43+00:00): Danke, hab die Meldung als erledigt markiert.
soliMM (2025-06-30 20:26:28+00:00): Hi dada24,

You have left this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1393855624 untagged. Please fix this.

Also provide brief description of what you did in changeset comment.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-06-10 12:40:54+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10311346694
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/371564400

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2025-06-11 09:46:19+00:00): تم استعادة هذه التغييرات وذلك لأنها تسببت في حذف وتغيير الحدود الإدارية، وأرجوا منكم إذا كان هناك تعديل أن يستند لمصدر وأيضا أن يتم بطريقة صحيحة لأن تحرير الحدود حساس ويحتاج لخبرة في ذلك ويفضل استخدام محرر مثل محرر جوسم لذلك، وقد يتسبب التعديل الغير صحيح لها في مشاكل في الخريطة
Lejun (2025-06-13 04:58:01+00:00): Le nom des piscines n'a à priori rien à faire là – comme toute information personnelle. Je l'enlève.
BCNorwich (2025-06-10 14:33:38+00:00): Corrections made.
flohoff (2025-06-11 06:06:23+00:00): Moin,
ich glaube nicht das das massentagging von residential=rural hier richtig ist:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40717351#map=15/51.56559/8.42433

Hier die definition von residential=rural

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:residential

"Rural, mostly undeveloped residential landuse. For the piece of land containing structures related to rural activities, such as farmhouses, stables, barns, equipment sheds, feed bunkers and the like, use landuse=farmyard instead."

Das wäre also was für die einzelnen "Altenteile" die irgendwo entstanden sind - aber definitiv nicht ganze Dörfer.

Flo
Stahlmann (2025-06-18 10:19:50+00:00): Die Seite selbst (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:residential%3Drural), beschreibt :rural als

"residential=rural is a subtag of landuse=residential and is used to specify residential areas with low-rise residential buildings (buildings with tag building=house). It is usual for each house has its own fenced allotment with yard and/or garden."

bzw.

"residential=rural ist ein Subtag von landuse=residential und wird verwendet, um Wohngebiete mit Wohngebäuden geringer Geschossigkeit building=house zu kennzeichnen. In der Regel hat jedes Haus einen eigenen, meist umzäunten, unbebauten Grundstücksteil mit Hof- und/oder Gartenflächen."

Das klingt für mich klar nach dem typischen Dorf. Beim Tagging achte ich insbesondere darauf, dass die betroffenen Flächen keine Mehrparteienhäuser, Schulen oder Supermärkte umfassen.

Eine Rückfrage von meiner Seite in der DACH Telegram-Gruppe vor einem guten halben Jahr ist im Sande verlaufen.

Eine bessere Differenzierung zwischen landuse:residential bebaut mit städtetypischen Gebäuden und Hochhäusern vs. landuse:residential bebaut mit typischen Dorfstrukturen habe ich leider auch nicht gefunden.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-11 05:20:14+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18332
BCNorwich (2025-06-10 14:45:15+00:00): Hi, I've reverted this changeset to reinstate the residential building. I've added the doctors at the correct building.
Andrea Musuruane (2025-06-23 14:30:20+00:00): Questo sentiero non si congiunge a nord con altri sentieri o strade
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167443255
Massimo Barbonaglia (2025-06-24 05:44:25+00:00): La strada vicinale Gabina, presente anche a catasto, si collega ad una corte in mezzo ad abitazioni, raggiungibile dall'androne denominato Via vicinale Vigna Merla
The_Nickname (2025-06-10 12:56:06+00:00): Quelle: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4697419
Glassman (2025-06-10 21:03:53+00:00): He observado que estás eliminando áreas y luego volviéndolas a añadir con geometrías ligeramente diferentes. En lugar de hacer eso, simplemente modifica la geometría para guardar el historial del objeto.

(in English)
I noticed that you are removing areas then adding them back with slightly different geometries. Instead of doing that just modify the geometry to save the history of the object.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167443527
BCNorwich (2025-06-10 14:47:18+00:00): Hi, I've removed the school POI. The school tags are all on the school premises outline as per OSM practice.
ChrissW-R1 (2025-06-10 13:07:29+00:00): Wrong description and sources added by JOSM.

description=added island of Kaltehof
source=https://wasserkunst-hamburg.de; https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaltehofe; https://youtube.com/watch?v=7WUIQF5QJdk; etc.
ChrissW-R1 (2025-06-10 13:09:47+00:00): See https://osm.org/changeset/167444055
ChrissW-R1 (2025-06-10 13:10:01+00:00): See https://osm.org/changeset/167443951
user_5359 (2025-06-12 09:01:10+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/12902165853. What is the mean of the tag currency:تومان  =  yes? According to Google, this is a coin and not a currency.
mcliquid (2025-06-30 10:06:29+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
The_Nickname (2025-06-10 13:14:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4738279
rskedgell (2025-07-23 13:14:07+00:00): In what way is adding incorrect (and on public roads in the UK, impossible) foot=use_sidepath access restrictions instead of correctly setting sidewalk:$side=separate a "big improvement"?
CJJ2501 (2025-08-06 13:59:13+00:00): If you look at the changeset you can see that quite a few sidewalks were added, and that many roads and buildings had their alignment improved.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=167444504

(Rest of reply regarding the foot=use_sidepath tag on this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169343421)
rskedgell (2025-08-06 14:24:03+00:00): I'd like to thank you for all the realignments and the separate sidewalks which you added. Those are very helpful and I'm sure everyone using OSM data here will benefit.

You'll see that the changes I made subsequently didn't lose any of that. I removed instances foot foot=no and replaced foot=use_sidepath with sidewalk:$side=separate.

I also made a few minor splits in footway=crossing ways so that they didn't form T-junctions with footway=sidewalk ways. This makes it a lot easier to survey and add accessibility features and obstacles like kerbs and tactile paving with tools like StreetComplete.

If my tone grew more abrasive through successive changeset comments, I apologise. Discovering a large number of non-existent pedestrian prohibitions on the carriageways of major roads did not entirely fill me with joy.
CJJ2501 (2025-08-06 14:36:43+00:00): Cool, thank you for explaining!

"did not entirely fill me with joy" is great 😂 I'm going to start using that.
petajalanterbuka (2025-06-11 16:46:46+00:00): Please dont name element as the description of the element
andygol (2025-06-11 08:42:30+00:00): Доброго дня.

В цьому наборі змін ви створили самоперетин контурів мультиполігонів Камʼянського водосховища та Дніпровського водосховища, через це від Кременчука до Запоріжжя замість Дніпра утворилась біла пляма на Стандартному шарі. 

Я вже виправив цю помилку. Тепер треба дочекатись поки зміни підхватить гендер. 

Будь ласка наступного разу будьте уважні. Також рекомендую ознайомитись з цією статтею в Вікі ОСМ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Using_Imagery
Кріц (2025-06-12 08:42:03+00:00): Вибачаюсь, дякую, що виправили
NorthCrab_upload (2025-06-10 14:02:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397294175
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397294233
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/525398863
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/525399878
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/525399880
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/525981157
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/525981161
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1192484679

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
sinek123 (2026-07-17 17:10:51+00:00): What is the  reason you added this many trees most of them are in the wrong spots by the way
marmara_editor (2026-07-17 17:40:16+00:00): I used the “Kentsel Ağaç” layer on the Ministry of Environment and Urbanization’s Bulut KBS website as my source; this layer was generated using the “10 cm orthophoto” layer available on the same site. The trees showing inconsistencies are only those that have been cut down and replaced with buildings.

The data locations are consistent with the HGM Atlas base map, the 10 cm orthophoto base map, and satellite imagery from Bing and Esri. You can delete any trees that appear to be out of place, but upon rechecking, I found that nearly all of them are in the correct location.
dadavid (2025-06-11 11:32:19+00:00): Hi, 

i reverted your deletion of this road, as it obviously exists in the real world. The fact that it cannot be accessed by the public can be tagged with access=private

See the wiki for details on why we dont delete private road. 

Greetings and have fun with osm :) 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-06-11 10:37:19+00:00): Moin OpenStreetBoy,

sieht die Zufahrt nach Neumühlen nicht mehr so aus?
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/weg-mit-unterschiedlichen-oberflachen-pro-fahrspur-wie-taggen/89846

Und warum taggst Du foot/bicycle=yes?

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-06-11 10:39:38+00:00): Und die Zufahrt  von Bierde aus ist inzwischen nicht mehr mit dem Kfz möglich?
OpenStreetBoy (2025-06-24 09:57:55+00:00): Die Zufahrt wird im Augenblick neu gepflastert (über die ganze Breite), der größte Teil ist schon fertig.
OpenStreetBoy (2025-06-24 10:01:06+00:00): Bzgl Zufahrt aus Bierde - das habe ich nicht gepfüft. Bin an der Böhme entlang gewandert und der letzte Abschnitt sieht ja wie ein normaler Wald/Fortsweg aus (daher eher track).
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-06-24 10:25:25+00:00): Ja, ich weiß. Sieht wie Waldweg aus. Ist aber trotzdem Zufahrt.
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-06-25 11:37:34+00:00): Wurde die Fußgängerbrücke über die Böhme auch neu gemacht? Weil Du sie in in hw=service geändert hast.
rempshaener (2025-06-11 20:00:47+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Grundsätzlich müssen nicht existente Hydranten natürlich raus.
In diesem speziellen Fall hätte es vielleicht noch eine andere Möglichkeit gegeben – mit dem Vorteil zusätzlicher Daten und als „Vorsorge“.
Ich meine die Umstellung des vermeintlichen Hydranten auf
man_made=monitoring_station
monitoring:water_level=yes

Das hätte zwei Vorteile:
1. Eine zusätzliche Grundwassermessstelle in unseren Daten.
2. Der nächste Mapper, der versehentlich auf einen Hydranten tippt, stolpert bei der Erfassung wahrscheinlich über die monitoring_station und überlegt noch mal.

Viele Grüße
joost schouppe (2025-07-25 08:49:42+00:00): Als het gebouw nog in aanbouw is, dan is het in principe nog geen theater; je zou dan eventueel voorlopig construction=theatre kunnen zetten. Maar als het al bijna klaar is, dan kunnen we het wel zo laten
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-10-29 23:13:12+00:00): Did not folow task instructions
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167447296
Andrea Musuruane (2025-06-11 08:23:04+00:00): Dubito che questo ristorante sia in mezzo al Sesia.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167447519
ivanbranco (2025-06-11 08:29:03+00:00): L'utente ha aperto una nota per segnalare il problema: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4799029
Andrea Musuruane (2025-06-11 08:33:02+00:00): Ho visto dopo, grazie.
Aya Samir (2025-06-11 09:04:48+00:00): Hello, guenaoua ;
Thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap.
Could you please share with me your sources about the ref tag you changed in these segments
way 714391070
way 1067724013
way 714391069
Regards
Aya Samir
treestryder (2025-06-14 02:46:55+00:00): See comment here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148486136
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 01:34:09+00:00): Hello!

You used
railway=Signal Box
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188310328/history

Have you maybe meant
railway=signal_box
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Jazzalaa (2026-02-04 01:43:12+00:00): Hi. Apologies for the error.  I think it may have autocorrected it and removed the underscore.  It is a signal box (signalling centre) so believe it should be signal_box