piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tux67 (2025-01-23 10:21:29+00:00): Hi Glg11,
was  wolltest du mit diesem CS Comment sagen?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161659037
mariotomo (2025-01-27 06:58:42+00:00): hola, gracias por la contribución, bienvenido a OSM, y una sugerencia de mejora: e la realidad "Mini Súper Angela" es el nombre del establecimiento comercial, no de un edificio. o sea, falta marcar el establecimiento comercial asociado al edificio.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Item:Q4830
NewryCanal (2025-01-23 03:53:58+00:00): Hello miroslavuzice87,
  I reviewed the road Jirón Cruz del Sur (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35893589, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35893577) and made an update here. Thanks for reaching out.
 
Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2025-01-23 04:40:14+00:00): 你好：

由於你的變更集使用不相容OpenStreetMap的授權，因此被回退。

詳情見社群討論區文章：https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/124651

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161659899
user_8655426 (2025-01-25 08:32:02+00:00): こんにちは。
1つの変更セットで、広範囲にわたり地物を編集されていますが、もう少し範囲を狭くしていただけないでしょうか？
まだ日本語化されていないため英語版になりますが、Wiki ページのご確認をお願いいたします。

・Geographical size of changesets (変更セットの地理的サイズ )
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

それから、編集内容についてですが、追加された情報に不自然な点が多く、正当な方法で情報収集をされているようには見えません。OSMで利用可能なデータソースや情報収集方法などを、以下のページでご確認ください。

・利用可能なデータソース
https://openstreetmap.jp/node/764

・データの情報源 (著作権のあるデータは使わないでください)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Beginners_Guide_1.1

・JA:よくある質問 (なぜ OpenStreetMap なのか？)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:よくある質問

「地元マッパー」とのトラブルを避けるため、変更セットなどに source (情報源)を明示することをおすすめします。

・JA:Key:source
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:source

また、背景画像にBing を使用されていますが、Bingは地域によって古かったりずれていたりします。「現地調査」を行うなどして最適な画像を確認し、位置調整を行ったうえで地物をトレースしてください。他のユーザー、特に地元マッパーがつくったデータをむやみに動かさないようお願いします。

・JA:画像の利用
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:画像の利用

・JA:安楽椅子マッピング (ガイドライン)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:安楽椅子マッピング
setomaps (2025-01-27 11:45:27+00:00): 今後留意して編集します。
PierZen (2025-11-07 16:09:08+00:00): À noter que les données source canvec que vous utilisez ne sont pas alignées avec données Géoabase Ca hydrographie et GRHQ Qc. Les données Géobase plus précises et mises à date devraient être utilisées plutôt que Canvec.   Aussi, vous ajoutez des linéaires de cours d'eau entre deux lacs en doublon avec de grands fleuves et rivières déja tracés sur de longues distance avant l'import plus systématique. voir par exemple https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/56.392014/-65.585171
jmarchon (2025-11-09 04:57:09+00:00): See reply here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164400213
NeisBot (2025-02-08 08:06:10+00:00): Hi kikihari, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 42 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
freeExec (2025-01-23 05:25:21+00:00): Зачем удалять правильные теги? Почему этот салон повешан на дом, а создан отдельной точкой?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-02 10:27:22+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12525661079/history has fixme:type = school that was added in this edit
Would it be amenity=school ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool )
Something else?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-10 16:33:06+00:00): Hello!

You used
access=privategg
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12525675862/history

Have you maybe meant
access=private
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Filip009 (2025-01-23 07:02:00+00:00): Tieto malé smerovníky sa značia ako malý smerovník https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12525678746
VáclavS (2025-01-23 09:57:38+00:00): áno ďakujem
Grass-snake (2025-01-23 16:51:55+00:00): Здравствуйте, обращаю внимание:
1. В СМИ пишут, что переименование улицы произошло "до ул. Сталеваров", то есть возможно есть смысл перепроверить названия улиц южнее отмеченных отрезков (улица Надежды).
2. Если переименовываете улицы, обязательно сохраняйте старое название в теге old_name=* (подробнее по ссылке https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:old_name ), это поможет пользователям карты искать исторические названия улиц.
3. В данном случае отрезкам кругового движения также имеют старое название "Рождественская улица" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091557902/history/3 (не знаю специфики именования в Вашем городе). Уточните пожалуйста, старые названия для них сохраняются?
4. Пожалуйста, рассмотрите возможность указывать "Николая Шевченко проспект", а не "проспект Николая Шевченко".
Gleb_Artyomenko (2025-01-23 09:29:38+00:00): Clarification: oneway direction was added based on ICGC - Ortofoto de Catalunya 1:2.500 vigent and KartaView #mapbox_roads_attributes
Entbert (2025-09-24 11:57:13+00:00): Moin, das Zs 106 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/258940089 ist vermutlich ein Fehler?
ManuelB701 (2025-09-29 05:19:39+00:00): Ich vermute mal, dass ich hier ein Zs13 eintragen wollte und versehentlich das DR-Signal genommen habe.
eggie (2025-01-23 07:56:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Dawid2849 (2025-02-10 20:50:13+00:00): Cześć. Czy sklep jest już otwarty? Jak nie, to pasuje zmienić na `construction:shop`.
TrickyFoxy (2025-01-28 10:16:53+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161851394
uknown-gryphus (2025-02-11 17:03:31+00:00): Hi,

National Highways should always be classified as highway=trunk, in this case the airport approach road is supposed to be NH166S, so it should be a trunk road. The new classification as secondary is incorrect.
silversurfer83 (2025-01-23 21:19:06+00:00): Ja moin :)

sicher, dass das hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/628011851 kein Gebäude ist? Ihr habt hier nämlich ein landuse gesetzt. Guckt da bitte nochmal drauf

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161662980
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-23 07:50:58+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2600767824
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1061818720

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-23 11:58:05+00:00): Witam. Wcześniejsza wiadomość jest od bota ale często ma rację. Ciężko powiedzieć faktycznie do czego przypisać adres. 
Sam też nie jestem jakoś biegły w edytowaniu. Do obrysów budynków możesz sobie włączyć podkład budynków (czasami bywają błędne).
Po wykonaniu obrysu można go zaznaczyć i nacisnąć [Q] - poprawia kąty.
nazwa to raczej Wydział Technologii i Jakości Budowy Dróg – Laboratorium Drogowe https://www.gov.pl/web/gddkia-kielce/wydzialy-i-zespoly2 
To czy to budynek typu office czy inny musiałbym doczytać i wiedzieć co tam faktycznie mają i robią. Rodzaje budynków https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:building dostępne też z poziomu edytora. Można by się też bawić w landuse czy amenity. Nie wszystko na raz na początek.

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5&si=tWRfumz6UegEX8w8
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-23 12:02:12+00:00): Building levels to raczej nie 1. lepiej to usunąć lub wpisać poprawną wartość jeżeli ją znamy.
impiaaa (2025-01-23 18:24:45+00:00): Thanks for contributing to the challenge! The node you replaced has a different address. Are you sure there isn't something else there?
Captain_K1rk (2025-01-24 07:21:39+00:00): I have a google maps picture of the business if you need conformation
impiaaa (2025-01-24 15:05:22+00:00): Using Google Maps material for OSM reference is illegal, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google . If you have your own photo, you can upload it to e.g. Mapillary https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapillary
Captain_K1rk (2025-01-24 17:25:24+00:00): Understood, unfortunately the photo I grabbed was from Google maps so I would assume that is also illegal. Please delete the point as I used illegal means of acquiring it, I will be more careful in the future.
SS_L (2025-04-05 17:00:51+00:00): By labelling the the slip road under construction, do you know buses are unable to turn left? You should at least make the junction to facilitate left turn!
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-23 08:10:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400648531

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SS_L (2025-04-05 17:07:40+00:00): Again, making the slip road under construction, you are making vehicle unable to left turn! Make the junction to facilitate left turn!
MarcoR (2025-01-23 14:17:54+00:00): Ciao!
Ti consiglio di non fare troppo caso a come viene rappresentato il dato sulla mappa e di non mappare in un modo (magari non corretto) solo per avere l'icona in una certa posizione. La mappa che vedi sul sito di OpenStreetMap è solo uno stile di esempio e non deve essere considerato "ufficiale". Inoltre devi dare il tempo alla mappa di aggiornarsi a tutti i livelli (a volte aiuta cancellare la cache del browser).

Nella fattispecie, secondo me è corretto mappare un ufficio con un nodo all'interno di un edificio se l'ufficio non lo occupa interamente.

Buon mapping,
Marco
bibliotecamorante (2025-01-23 17:33:22+00:00): Grazie, anche con ctrl + F5 il risultato è lo stesso. Speravo semplicemente che nella versione pubblica apparisse l'icona governativa che mi appare invece loggandomi. La biblioteca e l'ostello hanno un logo distintivo ma la direzione Tecnica del Municipio appare ancora come un puntino. Spero che con i giorni apparirà un'icona rappresentativa, anziché un semplice puntino. Grazie per le dritte!
impiaaa (2025-01-23 18:17:41+00:00): Thank you for contributing to the challenge! Please be sure to check that a business isn't already mapped before adding it. In this case, the Capitol Flea Market already exists here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38059602
Yog Sot (2025-01-23 15:28:50+00:00): ale w tym węźle stoi znak, że to rowerówka z lewej, a piesza  z prawej i do tego jeszcze `separated` ;d
Wiec nie dopuszczenie, tlyko 100% dedykowana xd
db-ak (2025-01-23 15:32:28+00:00): Wcześniej jest taki dop:
|https://www.google.com/maps/@52.4452178,16.9466558,3a,15y,347.12h,89.33t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sZxux9OsBFKCXFlfVMhAqBw!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D0.6688020930482566%26panoid%3DZxux9OsBFKCXFlfVMhAqBw%26yaw%3D347.12410138868256!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDEyMC4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D

A tu w drzewach teraz to zauważyłem: https://www.google.com/maps/@52.4457973,16.9469321,3a,15y,253.99h,90.45t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1swkW2kRX4HWozmyZT2dXGAw!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D-0.4498754263674698%26panoid%3DwkW2kRX4HWozmyZT2dXGAw%26yaw%3D253.98918338136284!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDEyMC4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D

Więc można zmienić na chodnik z dop lub DPR z segregated no
Yog Sot (2025-01-24 00:03:31+00:00): stosowanie googla jako źródła danych jest zabronione w OSM. zabrania tego licencja, nie chwal się więcej, że mapujesz z googla, bo wtedy takie zmiany muszą być wycofane, by nie łamać prawa własności.  Mapuj z "pamięci" ;)
Dlatego wycofuję tą zmianę wprowadzoną zapewne trochę z googla i wprowadzam teraz swoją z pamięci ;)

Znak o którym pisałem z pionowym przedzieleniem jest w miejscu węzła, który wskazałem
geomaniX (2025-05-21 07:43:32+00:00): Moin!
Du hattest hier die Ladestation beim Aldi (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12177095402) auf disused gesetzt.
Laut der neusten Version vom Ladesäulenregister soll dort eine Schnellladesäule stehen. Waren da bei deiner Bearbeitung vielleicht Bauarbeiten oder so?

VG 
geomaniX
chris66 (2025-05-21 07:46:47+00:00): Moin,
puh, kann mich nicht mehr dran erinnen, höchstwahrscheinlich hatte ich die wegen einer "Note" auf disused gesetzt.

VG.
geomaniX (2025-05-21 08:09:19+00:00): Alle klar, ich habe sie dann reaktiviert.
Anscheinend wurde die wohl um ein paar Meter versetzt und war deshalb nicht zu sehen.
Gibt es eine Möglichkeit, sich auch gelöste und damit nicht mehr sichtbare Notes nochmal anzeigen zu lassen, wenn man den Link zur Note, bzw. deren ID nicht mehr hat?

VG
geomaniX
chris66 (2025-05-21 08:24:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4434951#map=15/51.79883/8.03483
dvdhoven (2025-01-23 11:12:55+00:00): Ik heb N24-N46 de tag fixme=incomplete gegeven.
Dan komt hij in een speciaal lijstje bij knooppuntnet.nl en wordt niet meer gezien als een onderbroken route.
Ook zag ik dat je in netwerkroutes name gebruikt. Echter het is al een lange tijd gebruikelijk om ref te gebruiken ipv name. Dus ref=N24-N46.
Er is ooit een grote omzettingsactie geweest om van name naar ref te gaan.
Kun je je routes eens nalopen en name in ref veranderen?
Dan zijn we weer in lijn met de gebruikelijke standaards

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
spaanse (2025-01-23 13:32:30+00:00): Beste Dick,

Ik heb de routes langsgelopen, en die zouden nu ref moeten hebben in plaats van name (changeset 161674697)

Doe zo nog een check in overpass of ik wat heb gemist.
eggie (2025-01-23 09:14:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Probeer paden los te houden van de landuse forest e.d. 
Ik heb het losgemaakt.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-01-23 09:16:50+00:00): Feedback 
access=no op wegen en paden is bijna altijd verkeerd gebruikt. 
Waarom is het Verboden Toegang op het Paulus Potterpad?
Voorlopig access=no verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
afd verkeer I gemeente Baarn (2025-01-23 10:29:56+00:00): Beste Eggie,
Verkeerd geinterpreteerd. Het is een voetpad, de aanname was dat met 'no' alles op 'no' zou staan, waarna ik de uitzonderingen hierop zou aangeven. Goed dit te weten. Het is vrij voor voetgangers.
eggie (2025-01-23 10:48:34+00:00): Yep... Het is net andersom....  :)
Geef de uitzonderingen aan (bv vehicle=no) 

Maar op een highway=footway hoef je niet aan te geven bicycle=no, maar p een highway=path weer wel, want dat routeert voor fietsers per default.
Dit Potterpad (highway=path) zal dus per default routeren voor fietsers en voetgangers. 

accesstagging is best lastig. Vragen staat vrij.

In de wiki vind je wat al ingebakken zit (implies)  en dat hoef je dan niet aan te geven.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway

Mapse

Mapse
egge
eggie (2025-01-23 10:50:38+00:00): Dan in het kort..
highway=footway gebruiken bij een G7 bord en/of duidelijk alleen voor wandelaars.
high=path gebruiken als er geen bebording is, maar dan wel aangeven bicycle=yes of no.
eggie (2025-01-23 09:20:39+00:00): Dag afd Verkeer   Ik heb een verbinding gemaakt met de Baarnsche Dijk. Het zou anders niet routeren.
access=no? Voor wie? 

MVG
eggie
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 01:38:11+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165050874
joost schouppe (2025-03-18 13:13:50+00:00): En ook deze is een chapel, geen kerk
citrula (2025-01-23 23:09:56+00:00): reverted - you changed the name of a nearby service road. Please take a look at the built-in tutorial.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161692644
Supaplex (2025-01-24 02:57:21+00:00): Hi Cuick Trac

Be sure of what you change. The road that was changed by mistake has already been reverted.

The commenter mention the tutorial, please have a look, and avoid future mistake.

Dennis Raylin Chen
Data Working Group
data@osmfoundation.org
[Ticket#2025012410000049]
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 15:54:24+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12525976266/history has shop = spare_parts that was added in this edit
shop=spare_parts ? What kind of spare parts? Of car parts? specialized machinery? sailing boats? train models? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for possible values - though maybe new one is needed)
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:49:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:49:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:48:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:48:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:49:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:49:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:48:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:48:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:49:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:48:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:49:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:48:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:49:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:48:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:49:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:48:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:48:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:48:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:48:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:48:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:49:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
StreetSurveyor (2025-02-15 02:55:03+00:00): This was a bad edit. The road forks to two driveways as was previously indicated.
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:48:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
AnaVrbica (2025-02-10 21:53:14+00:00): Reverted because of an incorrect split #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162369386
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:48:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:49:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:48:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:48:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:49:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
joost schouppe (2025-03-18 13:14:55+00:00): Ook deze chapel niet chruch
Eebie (2025-03-25 20:17:36+00:00): Bedankt voor de correcties.  Er is blijkbaar iets mis met een JOSM preset die ik gebruik. Dat ga ik uitzoeken en die corrigeren.
dbantoine (2025-03-05 14:30:57+00:00): Bonjour,
Il semble que ce chemin soit un chemin public pour tous usages et non uniquement pour cavalier. Avez vous une information confirmant qu'il est principalement désigné aux cavaliers ? Si non, à remettre en chemin classique svp. Merci
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:48:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:49:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
maraf24 (2026-03-28 09:17:09+00:00): Ruin, not a chapel and not a place of worship.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 01:32:35+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164657393
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-23 10:48:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161669069 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by velascosanz
Lostmonkey (2025-08-06 17:54:45+00:00): Is this waterway=fairway an official (marked) route?