piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
canfe (2023-05-11 08:12:14+00:00): Ho digitato male io, intendevo di usare questo TAG (e non tax):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fixme
mkopinsky (2023-06-30 14:20:19+00:00): This golf course does not exist anymore and it is now an entire residential neighborhood. It has been completely removed and overbuilt by houses, roads and other structures.

Features that no longer exist and have been overbuilt should not be mapped on OSM. A good place to put them would be on OpenHistoricalMap (OHM) though so that the history may be preserved.

Additionally, please use descriptive changeset comments so others can tell what you're editing and why.
mkopinsky (2023-06-30 15:55:47+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137964626
gscholz (2023-05-04 07:24:03+00:00): HiTBZ1599S,
this changeset has left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=23.78200&lat=40.12924&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about how hiking routes are edited properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking

If you look at the data of this changeset, you can see that you have ignored a warning about crossing ways your editor ID has shown you. Please do not ignore this kind of hints.

Kind regards
Guido
TBZ1599S (2023-05-10 18:46:45+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. Unfortunately I have not found a way to delete the changes. Can you please apply it.
gscholz (2023-05-11 06:33:53+00:00): Hi TBZ1599S ,
there are still overlapping ways left. Just click on the OSM inspector link above to see them. This view is updated once per day at about 00 h GMT, so you can easily check the results of your activities yourself.
Guido
eggie (2023-04-15 12:33:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  De accesstags die je toevoegt zijn gewoon default. Dat hoef je niet op wegen bij te taggen. incline=0%  hoeft ook niet. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Supaplex030 (2023-04-17 09:17:17+00:00): Hey Robert, on crossing way segments like this one (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1162782177) it's useful to add "footway=crossing" (like "footway=sidewalk", but for crossings ;)

Maybe you can include this tag to your nice mapping workflow :)

Best, Alex
user_18208051 (2023-04-17 10:49:19+00:00): Hey Alex, thanks for your feedback, the crossing-tags are defined now. 
Best Robert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-15 12:00:11+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 134497367, 134497521, 134497978, 134498119, 134498246, 134498486, 134498552, 134583726.
Adela Švončinárová (2023-04-15 13:25:49+00:00): jeeeej galanta
mkopinsky (2023-06-30 15:57:28+00:00): This golf course does not exist anymore and it is now an entire residential neighborhood. It has been completely removed and overbuilt by houses, roads and other structures.

Features that no longer exist and have been overbuilt should not be mapped on OSM. A good place to put them would be on OpenHistoricalMap (OHM) though so that the history may be preserved.

Additionally, please use descriptive changeset comments so others can tell what you're editing and why.
mkopinsky (2023-06-30 16:04:08+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137964748
Jakka (2023-04-16 08:18:30+00:00): Quelle "attraction"  ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-15 12:14:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134937949.
mkopinsky (2023-06-30 15:57:24+00:00): This golf course does not exist anymore and it is now an entire residential neighborhood. It has been completely removed and overbuilt by houses, roads and other structures.

Features that no longer exist and have been overbuilt should not be mapped on OSM. A good place to put them would be on OpenHistoricalMap (OHM) though so that the history may be preserved.

Additionally, please use descriptive changeset comments so others can tell what you're editing and why.
mkopinsky (2023-06-30 16:04:13+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137964748
gscholz (2023-05-04 07:20:05+00:00): HiTBZ1599S,
this changeset has left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=23.81343&lat=40.08839&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-05-10 06:55:02+00:00): HiTBZ1599S, 
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
TBZ1599S (2023-05-10 18:47:39+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. Unfortunately I have not found a way to delete the changes. Can you please apply it.
mkopinsky (2023-06-30 15:57:18+00:00): This golf course does not exist anymore and it is now an entire residential neighborhood. It has been completely removed and overbuilt by houses, roads and other structures.

Features that no longer exist and have been overbuilt should not be mapped on OSM. A good place to put them would be on OpenHistoricalMap (OHM) though so that the history may be preserved.

Additionally, please use descriptive changeset comments so others can tell what you're editing and why.
mkopinsky (2023-06-30 16:04:22+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137964748
mkopinsky (2023-06-30 15:57:14+00:00): This golf course does not exist anymore and it is now an entire residential neighborhood. It has been completely removed and overbuilt by houses, roads and other structures.

Features that no longer exist and have been overbuilt should not be mapped on OSM. A good place to put them would be on OpenHistoricalMap (OHM) though so that the history may be preserved.

Additionally, please use descriptive changeset comments so others can tell what you're editing and why.
mkopinsky (2023-06-30 16:04:28+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137964748
eggie (2023-04-15 12:48:03+00:00): Dag Bieb...

De format van de tags liggen vast in OSM.
De taal is UK English.
Nu kloppen de openingstijden niet meer.
OSM doet hier niets mee en geeft alleen een foutmelding.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=134938349
Gebruik anders deze toel voor openingstijden.

openingsuren-tool 
 
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ 


MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-15 12:40:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10814352058

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2023-04-16 19:30:28+00:00): Hello! don‘t use the production database for you private working data.
mkopinsky (2023-06-30 15:57:09+00:00): This golf course does not exist anymore and it is now an entire residential neighborhood. It has been completely removed and overbuilt by houses, roads and other structures.

Features that no longer exist and have been overbuilt should not be mapped on OSM. A good place to put them would be on OpenHistoricalMap (OHM) though so that the history may be preserved.

Additionally, please use descriptive changeset comments so others can tell what you're editing and why.
mkopinsky (2023-06-30 16:05:05+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137964748
user_12500175 (2023-04-15 13:28:35+00:00): Hallo,
klasse dass du bei OSM mitmachst und hilfst die Daten zu verbessern :-)
Nicht wundern, ich habe das Gebäude richtigerweise mit zum Haus genommen.

Gruß
Danfost
eggie (2023-04-15 13:07:08+00:00): Dag Bieb... Het lijkt me niet correct om het adres aan de straat te zetten.
Er is een looproute nu...  dus de Bieb is gewoon vindbaar.
MVG
eggie
felipeeugenio (2023-09-12 01:38:02+00:00): Hola. Bahía Catalina simplemente no tiene doble calzada. Fue eliminada. Por favor mapear lo que es verificable en terreno.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134939348
jptolosa (2023-09-12 05:18:00+00:00): Hola Claudia, para poder colocar nombres distintos a ambos lados de una calle se usan las claves name:left y name:right, no se debe separar la calle como lo has hecho acá.
Saludos.
Claudia Magallanes S (2023-09-12 09:02:28+00:00): Buenos días Felipe, me levanto con la sorpresa de tu changeset, primeramente agradecido de la información entiendo lo que mencionas, pero creo que la wiki o la directiva OSM, debería establecer que en estos casos se realice la división mediante linea, ya que al ser la descarga de algún polígono bajo marco comunal  arrojara los puntos de la comuna colindante, así mismo, si lo extrapolamos a algún sistema SIG, dispatch u otros que utilice datos de OSM y realice la búsqueda por comuna, si o si, lanzara un error tras ser de otra comuna. 

espero que se analice estos casos.

Saludos
Claudia M.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-15 13:10:54+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/916707367
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431068042

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck (2023-04-17 07:38:06+00:00): Dear m_bakhshipour, please refrain from altering any of the names of the Persian/Arabian gulf without prior discussion on OSM community media. If a discussion involving OSM community members from all regions bordering on this water body comes to the conclusion that a change is appropriate, the change can be made with a reference to a public record of the discussion in the changeset comment (not "no comment"). Any undiscussed changes will be reverted and, when repeated, will lead to account blocks. This issue is tracked in the DWG issue tracker under Ticket#2021050510000129.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-15 13:10:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105766581
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/269782511

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kwadratsqr (2023-04-15 14:12:59+00:00): Dziękuję - zobaczę w terenie, jak wygląda to podwójne Kilińskiego 28. Ten problem był wcześniej, ja poprawiałem tylko kody pocztowe, bez zmieniania numerów domów.
kwadratsqr (2023-04-15 17:20:14+00:00): Dziękuję - poprawiłem na 25, zgodnie z mapą na portalu Urzędu Miasta Rybnik.
Lostmonkey (2024-08-15 19:42:04+00:00): Ligger https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10814430795  rigtigt? Den er oprettet som en dublet af et leisure=sports_centre lidt længere mod højre.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2024-08-15 21:54:07+00:00): Har fjernet den.
Det kommer fra FVST så der har nok været en cafe eller lignende.
Taya_S (2023-04-15 13:12:54+00:00): Detailed explanation of these changesets and why they are so big:

The Nieuwlandsreid Saltmarsh area of Ameland was a mess, mapping wise. It consisted of 3 huge overlapping MP's, with 29, 46 and 25 members respectively. The 2 Saltmarsh MP's caused all inner areas that were part of the other MP to appear as if they were covered by wetland. Instead of having to figure out how to untangle that mess I decided to instead delete them and make a single MP from scratch, as that seemed like the better solution to me. 

- Removed mess that involved 3 large overlapping MP's that were causing problems and remade a single MP from scratch
- removed about a hundred random incorrect meadow areas, a bunch of incorrect heathland and other incorrect details
- redid tidal creeks and improved details
- updated the very out-of-date terrain
- various other small improvements

Will also be doing some further improvements later on, as detail is still lacking in some parts. I'll keep those changesets reasonably sized.
pl6025 (2023-04-28 13:38:01+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi les ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147380578 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147100976 ont maintenant l'attribut "ref=clemflippy" ?
Qu'est-ce que cette référence ?

Je vous invite à en parler sur le forum français d'OSM :
https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/utilisateur-clemflippy/14503
user_12500175 (2023-04-17 10:49:22+00:00): Hallo,
im Stück der Postillonstraße gibts eine Abbiegespur, sind also eigentlich 3 Spuren.

Gruß
Danfost
NieWnen (2023-04-15 13:49:13+00:00): Dlaczego masowo dodajesz w okolicy crossing:markings=yes/no?

To, że id coś proponuje, nie znaczy, że musi zostać zrobione (nie tylko to 
 sumie niestety – id sporo dziwnych rzeczy proponuje), a wydaje mi się to kompletnie zbędne w przypadku braku uszczegółowienia, nie mówiąc o potencjalnej weryfikacji każdego.

Wartość "yes" jest generyczna i nic nie zmienia w tym przypadku, a jak by była potrzeba zrobienia tego, to można to masowo zrobić dla całej Polski.
NieWnen (2023-04-16 10:04:43+00:00): Piękne przejście https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/914861482
James Makinde (2023-04-15 13:43:26+00:00): Djxn
ZeLonewolf (2023-04-30 02:20:47+00:00): Boundary is broken after this edit.
TheSwavu (2023-04-30 03:46:41+00:00): Fixed. Oddly Osmose flagged that Connells Point was broken but not Kyle Bay.
radiotrefoil (2023-05-01 11:42:40+00:00): Thanks for the heads up and fix.
NieWnen (2023-04-16 10:10:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/410598621

Bank miał Polskie wikidata, po co to zmieniać, skoro nie wygląda to na poprawną zmianę?
Lepiej już poprawić brand:wikipedia jeśli konfliktuje z wikidata.
Jakka (2023-04-16 08:50:18+00:00): distributeur a cigarrete ne se trouve jamais sur une rue .... corriger svp
Jakka (2023-04-16 08:47:45+00:00): c'est bien a cette endroit Lidl ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10814428901/history#map=19/50.71385/3.81778&layers=N
Jakka (2023-04-16 15:52:45+00:00): ce trouve ici
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.72232521395411/3.8329050692664524
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-04-16 18:40:37+00:00): Welcome, very nice edit.
One thing is that paths should connect on intersections, like this path
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1162803504
If paths are not connected apps won't be able to plot a route. Maybe they are not connected because a bridge is missing? In this case, obviously, they should be.

iD editor will show a message on the left to easily connect it with one click when you select the new path. Also, it shows warnings when you save your changes, don't forget to check them out.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-04-16 18:42:02+00:00): As for the ditch, it looks like there is a pipe. If you select the ditch, again with one click you can create a tunnel for it. Then just adjust the nodes (points) of tunnel start and end.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-04-16 18:46:19+00:00): Also, it's better to use path instead of a footpath for forest paths.

You can change the type by clicking foot path on top left when it's selected.
MrTolerant (2023-04-16 18:46:39+00:00): Thank you for comment) i'm newbie)
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-04-16 18:49:58+00:00): Very quick reaction :)

If there really is a pipe and you don't have to jump over a ditch, I'd recommend to create a tunnel. 

Click on the intersection and in feature type select "Point", this will remove ford. Then select the ditch and it will suggest you to add a tunnel.
wkdgs (2023-04-20 11:35:05+00:00): Kannst du auch vor die anderen Tags, die sich nur auf den Blitzer beziehen den Präfix "was:" schreiben? Die sind ja jetzt auch nicht mehr gültig.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134941732
Jakka (2023-04-16 08:42:07+00:00): salon de coiffure doit être dans périmètre bâtiment ou se trouve le ...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10814489837/history#map=19/50.73600/3.74088&layers=N
Tómas Ingi (2023-04-15 17:19:31+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap
/ Sæll, og velkominn á OpenStreetMap!

The name and number of the house are stored in the addr:street and addr:housenumber tags respectively, so there's no need to have them in the name tag :)

Hope to see more edits from you, always good to have people mapping their local surroundings!

Best regards,
Tómas Ingi
Jakka (2023-04-16 08:38:18+00:00): distributeur a ticket de transport est connecter sur une route/highway pas correct placer endroit excacte svp
moje_konto (2023-04-15 19:32:04+00:00): Jeden nowy budynek jest już w ewidencji jako zaplanowany, wtedy można stary obrys zmienić na proposed:building z nowym kształtem.

Gdy stare budynki są widoczne na fotomapie lub ewidencji (choć tu tylko dwa takie zostały), to można też zmieniać na demolished:building, dla jasności, by ktoś nie dodał ponownie.
Lostmonkey (2023-04-18 11:29:39+00:00): Findes MKA- The Burgery ved Bassin 7? Var forbi forleden og så ikke andet end byggeplads på det angivne punkt.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-04-18 19:18:12+00:00): Der er en smileyrapport fra den 4. april, hvor de skriver at der åbnes næste weekend.
https://findsmiley.dk/1218255
Lostmonkey (2023-04-25 08:25:39+00:00): Nu har jeg været forbi igen. Der er intet på stedet, der tyder på, at The Burgery åbner der inden for den nærmeste fremtid. Desuden er den smileyrapport du linker til jo fra 2022.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-04-25 16:35:43+00:00): Tak, har fjernet den.
gscholz (2023-04-19 07:11:10+00:00): Hi PcMouce1,
this changeset has created several errors regarding self intersecting lines and displaced roads:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-79.25931&lat=43.73355&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=134944327

I have reverted it to fix those issues.
Kind regards
Guido
limes11 (2023-04-15 17:59:08+00:00): Hallo, 

danke für den Beitrag zu OSM.

Kurze Nachfrage: Was genau ist hier? Das Hotel, sprich, die Zimmer? Oder sind die weiterhin auf der anderen Straßenseite?

Viele Grüße

Limes
user_5359 (2023-04-16 07:39:55+00:00): Ebenfalls Willkommen bei OSM! Kleiner Hinweis zum anderen Gebäude gegenüber (https://www.osm.org/way/277023974). Das building=Hotel Sarg nur, dass das Gebäude wie ein Hotel aussieht. Das dies ein Hotel ist, wird mit tourism=hotel gekennzeichnet.
eggie (2023-05-04 13:07:06+00:00): Dag Hugo..
Op een fietspad hoeft geen bicycle=yes
Onder welke categorie valt dit fietspad?

Mvg
eggie
eggie (2023-05-04 15:03:54+00:00): Het bord aan de kant van de Herenweg is geen aanduiding voor dat pad, maar zegt iets over het fietspad langs de Herenweg zelf.
Wanneer je er mag fietsen kan het beter als highway=path worden getagd.
Bij mijn weten staat er aan de Burgemeester van Lennepweg geen bord fietspad.
Wellicht nog even bekijken?

Maar het heeft in alle jaren geloof ik alle 'kleuren' gehad. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-05 06:08:27+00:00): Ik heb access=private een stukje van de oprit Herenweg verwijderd. Het zou anders nooit een oversteek mogelijk maken voor fietsers of voetgangers.
Groet
eggie
ma-rt-in (2023-11-19 08:36:29+00:00): Hallo,

was genau stellt diese POI dar?
Ich finde zu dem Namen nichts im Web.

vg
czubi (2023-11-19 09:03:20+00:00): das war ein Adressschild auf dem angehängten Bild aus der note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3593401#map=19/50.97564/11.03465 

das ist leider jetzt nicht mehr drin.

gegengecheckt habe ich es in goo... 
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Malteser+Hilfsdienst+'Marys+Refuge'/@50.9759486,11.0351351,15z/data=!4m6!3m5!1s0x47a47367b213a6dd:0xa1ddc388e07776b2!8m2!3d50.9759486!4d11.0351351!16s%2Fg%2F11tx6hgdz6?entry=ttu

OTG war ich nicht
ma-rt-in (2023-11-19 09:06:05+00:00): Google als Gegenquelle finde ich leider sehr unnütz. 
Und beim Malteser habe ich dazu nix gefunden. 
Ich denke man sollte die POI auf disused stellen.
czubi (2023-11-19 09:22:10+00:00): Ich vertraue grundsätzlich erstmal der note mit dem OTG Bild. Wenn ich nicht selbst vor Ort kann/bin checke ich es gegen, mit welchen Möglichkeiten auch immer. Das ein nochmaliger OTG Check besser wäre als google, ok, war aber in dem Fall nicht so. Mach eine note hin das du um einen erneuten OTG Check bittest. Wenn du meinst, das erste OTG Bild war dir nicht valide genug setze es meinetwegen auch auf disused
czubi (2023-11-19 09:30:09+00:00): https://www.google.com/search?q=Mary%27s+Refuge+erfurt&sca_esv=583738392&biw=1745&bih=835&ei=7NRZZbekH9L-7_UPi66EwA0&ved=0ahUKEwi3ytfJ38-CAxVS_7sIHQsXAdgQ4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=Mary%27s+Refuge+erfurt&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiFE1hcnkncyBSZWZ1Z2UgZXJmdXJ0MgUQIRigAUi9FVCJCFiNEHABeACQAQCYAXagAcIEqgEDNi4xuAEDyAEA-AEBwgILEAAYBxgeGBMYsAPCAhAQLhgTGK8BGMcBGIAEGLADwgIJEAAYHhgTGLADwgINEC4YgAQYExjHARivAcICCBAAGBYYHhgTwgILEAAYFhgeGBMYxwPCAg4QABgeGA0Y8QQYxwMYCsICBhAAGBYYHsICCBAAGAgYHhgNwgIIECEYFhgeGB3CAgcQIRigARgK4gMEGAEgQYgGAZAGCg&sclient=gws-wiz-serp

gleich x treffer, auch direkt bei Maltester)
ma-rt-in (2023-11-19 09:33:16+00:00): Danke fürs suchen. Ich passe das nun entsprechend an, da Rettungswache hier als POI nicht passt.
czubi (2023-11-19 14:44:31+00:00): Wäre für mich eher social_facility gewesen, würde auch besser zum wiki passen (siehe community_centre Abgrenzungen)
silversurfer83 (2023-04-16 18:12:04+00:00): Moin :)

Wie ist denn die Beschilderung für den Weg?
Deine Access tags sehen etwas widersprüchlich aus

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134944954
silversurfer83 (2023-05-10 15:09:26+00:00): Moin
wie sieht's denn aus?
Konkon153 (2023-04-15 15:24:24+00:00): [ und damit alle 1.538 aktuell vorhandenen Adressen in der Gemeinde Lübtheen vollständig angepasst ]
bxl-forever (2023-04-16 22:57:49+00:00): Hello,

Pardon my curiosity but why do you want to add "addr:country" on POI in our country?  We don’t do this here.

(I might also ask why you say that you "corrected" them, because there was no *mistake* in the dataset.)
mahiarsbr (2023-04-15 15:51:49+00:00): This place is right
user_5359 (2023-04-16 08:28:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add the type of the business.
aceman444 (2025-06-30 16:48:09+00:00): Dakujem, len prosim uvadzajte aj zdroj, lebo zo snimok Ortofoto tie nazvy co pridavate nevyplyvaju/nevidno ich tam.
DaveF (2023-04-16 14:08:54+00:00): Hi
I reverted your last changeset. All railway stations are tagged as nodes. I converted your  railway=station polygon to landuse=railway.
Nitnerock (2023-05-18 12:48:21+00:00): Cette suppression n'avait pas lieu d'être. Le chemin existe bien et c'est une entrée.
gscholz (2023-04-18 07:10:14+00:00): Hi mlugonzm,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines and duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-57.40962&lat=-25.33425&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
kapazao (2023-04-16 08:58:08+00:00): Hola, ¿el cambio de nombre de Piedra Sellada a Piedra Sillada de dónde viene? Deberías dar referencias de estos cambios de nombres, ya que este nombre venía de una importación del IGN, que es donde se indica el nombre correcto.
Por otra parte en caso de ser así deberías corregir la descripción de este elemento https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/802243245
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134946196
ramonz (2023-04-16 11:16:38+00:00): no hay acuerdo con la toponimia. Puedes hacer lo que creas conveniente así como yo lo hago.