piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:26:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-22 17:28:02+00:00): Hello!

You used
tracktype=grade2i
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/74590512/history

Have you maybe meant
tracktype=grade2
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
padvinder (2024-05-23 10:43:27+00:00): it is a typo
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-07 18:22:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149705092 where the changeset comment is: Aufräumen nach erneuter 'geocodec'-Mappingaktion s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
TuAmigoElEditor (2024-04-06 19:43:43+00:00): Hola. Por favor no duplique objetos ya existentes en el mapa.
Saludos.
qugeb (2024-04-19 08:55:22+00:00): Hallo Klaus, 
zur Telefonzelle an der Markuskirche: 
Da diese nicht mehr funktioniert, hatten wir uns in der Community darauf verständigt, diese noch sichtbaren, aber ausser Betrieb genommenen Telefonzellen als disused:amenity=telephone (statt amenity) zu taggen.
Siehe auch https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/anfang-2023-werden-alle-offentlichen-telefone-der-telekom-in-de-abgeschaltet/4712
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:22:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
d_berger (2024-04-06 16:50:13+00:00): In solchen Fällen arbeitet man _nicht_ mit einem Revert, denn damit hast du sämtliche ÖV-Relationen auf den Zustand von "anno irgendwann" zurückgesetzt.

Ich hab das jetzt von Hand gemacht, ging knapp drei Minuten und die Fahrbahngeometrie ist jetzt auch kein Zick-Zack mehr.[1] In Zukunft bitte von Hand arbeiten.

[1]https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149663273
vasony (2024-04-06 04:29:36+00:00): Szia!

Itt eltüntetted az iskola területét (a címmel együtt) és egy mezőt rajzoltál be helyette.
Az iskolának nincs udvara, csupán 1 épületből áll?

Tamás
gubi_2 (2024-04-06 06:44:11+00:00): Szia! 
Nem igazán van udvar, csak egy kicsi, de az sincs elválasztva semmivel a többi területtől. Nem látom értelmét fenntartani egy sárga zónát neki.
urbalazs (2024-04-06 07:29:44+00:00): Van egy, a közösség által elfogadott rajzolási módszer. Iskolák esetében ezt itt nézheted meg: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool Ez alapján visszaállítottam az iskolát. Kérlek, hogy önkényesen ne törölj semmit csak azért, mert szerinted nincs értelme.
silversurfer83 (2024-04-10 08:12:30+00:00): Hi AnneRV :)

is this a monument
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmonument
or rather a memorial
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmemorial
?

safe travels
silversurfer83
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:24:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
MxxCon (2024-04-09 02:54:42+00:00): Impressive. You got this multipolygon relation right the first time. 😁
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149634111
HellMap (2024-04-06 13:27:34+00:00): Hello,

I fixed a few things in your edit.

Roads that lead to individual properties should be driveways `highway=service` + `service=driveway`
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1270233530 . Living streets are only for designated living zones (the blue traffic sign).

It's also better to tag surface as `surface=compacted` rather than `surface=gravel` unless they really are larger rocks (walking or cycling would be very uncomfortable if not impossible).

You should usually adjust the existing buildings/features instead of redrawing them. For example, by redrawing
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111714783/history you actually deleted the address information on the old building.

Thanks
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:23:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
NeisBot (2024-04-05 22:34:02+00:00): Hello gameswill2008, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
nevw (2024-04-05 23:38:37+00:00): Hi, welcome to the osm. It is unclear what you are adding to the map here seems not to be the usual manner in which info is added to the map.
nevw (2024-04-05 23:45:19+00:00): I am not familiar with mapping signs but these links may help
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dinformation
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign
nevw (2024-04-05 23:52:13+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:information%3Dguidepost
tourism=information
information=guidepost
are required.
leisure=park is wrong
fortera_au (2024-04-06 13:35:45+00:00): I reckon this should just be reverted.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149634217
nevw (2024-04-06 22:54:40+00:00): I updated the tags to conform to wiki guidance to erase the splash of meaningless green text on osm.
This can be further refined by using a destination relation which I will leave for others.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:information%3Dguidepost
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign
Leo Slager (2024-04-06 10:40:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-04-06 22:36:32+00:00): Hi IBT3032,

Je vraagt om een review.
Heel netjes ingetekend. Ik veronderstel dat je al wat ervaring hebt met mappen.
we beginnen eigenlijk nooit met access=no, dat gebruiken we alleen als er een verkeersbord C1 staat.
foot=yes is in feite overbodig op een highway=pedestrian. Die is default niet toegankelijk voor andere verkeersdeelnemers.
IBT3032 (2024-04-07 17:42:02+00:00): Bedankt :), in OSM werken is nieuw voor me, maar met in kaart brengen heb ik ervaring.
En de access-aanduidingen hadden me inderdaad wat overdonderd. Ik ga het nog even na in de andere wijzigingensets die ik heb gemaakt.
Haritron (2024-04-05 23:51:15+00:00): Correction: Comment is “Corrected the English name of King Abdulaziz Bin Abdulrahman Al Saud Expressway in Kuwait. #adt”
user_21280234 (2024-04-07 19:28:57+00:00): Good for a new mapper!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149634872
solenoid jam (2025-02-11 17:52:36+00:00): Hello. I noticed strange objects on the map. Can you tell me what they are? Maybe there is a better tagging scheme for them

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1270238079
TuAmigoElEditor (2024-04-06 01:11:38+00:00): Hola. Varios edificios que usted añadió tienen de nombre la dirección mz y lt.
La etiqueta "name" solo se usa cuando el objeto tiene un nombre como "Casa Basadre" o "Casa Juridica".
En el Perú, las manzanas y lotes se mapean con las etiquetas "addr:block" y "addr:plot" respectivamente.
Saludos
LocalMapGuru (2024-04-12 18:27:51+00:00): Hi there,

Thanks for making updates in the Michigan region.  I noticed that you changed the Blue Water Energy Center to be a Combustion plant method when the EIA-860 2022 spreadsheet is classified as a Combined Cycle plant method.  Could you go back and confirm this?  If so, would you please correct this?

Thanks.
Olyon (2024-04-14 23:35:01+00:00): Hi,
Combined cycle is not a value for plant:method=* but for plant:type=*.
See the wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:plant:method
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:plant:type
Leo Slager (2024-04-06 22:45:02+00:00): review:
De oversteekplaats van de Meent zou ik even doortrekken en verbinden met de highway=footway aan de N-zijde.
Voor de goede werking van een navigatie app is dat wel noodzakelijk.
Kijk je zelf nog even ?
IBT3032 (2024-04-07 18:24:44+00:00): Bedankt, ik heb het aangepast.
IraGersh (2024-04-06 00:43:17+00:00): I will be here on April 25, 2024 and take many photos to add to features.
Trekrider2001 (2024-04-06 15:25:43+00:00): I did not take the information from Google.  I guess my reference to Google was misleading.  That was just supposed to point out that Google had this street named and that Google matched my local knowledge.  So what do I need to do?  Resubmit the change without any mention of Google?
tekim (2024-04-06 16:50:38+00:00): Hello again,  Thanks for your reply.  The Google Maps terms of use don't just talk about copying (i.e. "taking"), but more broadly "using."  Therefore, *using* Google Maps to confirm/verify/validate another source, such as seems to be the case here, is also prohibited.  It certainly indicates that you consulted Google Maps at some point either before, during, or immediately after, making this edit.  In any event, why would one want to mention a commercial map source with very restrictive terms of use when contributing to an open data project like OSM?  You are free to visit the area in question to collect the data in person and redo the edit from scratch (do not simply revert the revert).

Another issue with this edit is that you abbreviated the name.  In OSM we spell names out, although there are a few exceptions, none of which apply here.
Tommybara (2024-04-06 20:53:26+00:00): Please resolve unclosed/broken multipolygons before you commit your edit!
JJIglesias (2024-04-06 07:23:40+00:00): Single_family es aplicable a viviendas individuales en areas residenciales NO CERRADAS, las Urbanizaciones El Bosque Norte y Sur son CONDOMINIOS cerrados No abiertos, las casas pueden ser single_family pero el AREA NO LO ES.

Saludos
5m4u9 (2024-04-06 09:03:27+00:00): Hola, no existe esa restricción que mencionas en la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:residential
JJIglesias (2024-04-06 18:19:19+00:00): lo diga o no la Wiki, esos son Condominios Cerrados, con acceso privado
5m4u9 (2024-04-06 23:44:22+00:00): Hola, sin afán de polémica. Nadie dice que no son condominios, si vamos a la definición: "A condominium is an ownership regime in which a (group of) buildings is divided into multiple units that are either each separately owned"

Es decir, que es más algo de propiedad que una forma de vivienda. Obviamente, los condominios aquí en Bolivia tienen una fuerte influencia de USA. Investigando un poco, hay una etiqueta exclusiva condo=yes.

Un caso interesante son los condominios que son departamentos, cómo queda eso? para mi, siguen siendo apartments, y quizá deberíamos añadir la etiqueta condo=yes 🤔

En europa y américa, estuve revisando y hay mapeado áreas cerradas privadas con single_family. 👀
JJIglesias (2024-04-07 08:49:57+00:00): El que las areas y las viviendas son distintas, los Condominios de edificios son Apartment o Apartment complex.

Las areas residenciales cerradas son Condominios en el sentido Americano, aunque en Argentina las llaman Countries.

Si bien en USA la figura de propiedad cerrada es Condominium, hay decenas de Suburbios No cerrados cuya función es netamente Residencial (esta prohibido cualquier actividad comercial explicita) donde aplica mas single_family. 

Supongo que el wiki no es demasiado explicito porque las figuras pueden variar entre el enfoque "Americano" y el "Europeo" 

Y si le preguntas a la Gente que viven en el Bosque, te dirán que es un Condominio Privado, tal como hay otros en la ciudad y decenas en SCZ.
JJIglesias (2024-04-07 08:52:08+00:00): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condominium
5m4u9 (2024-04-08 00:31:57+00:00): Yo solo hablaba del área total y qué uso residencial tiene en el sentido urbanístico.

Lo ideal sería que la alcaldía diga (planifique) y haga cumplir qué zonas son residenciales, industriales, comunes (parques/plazas/deportiva), comerciales. Pero en Bolivia, la persona privada se asienta ilegal o -como en este caso- autodeterminan el uso residencial de única familia privado.

Esta definición me parece más ajusta a la etiqueta que discutimos →
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-family_zoning, "el área/zona es single_family porque no se permite terrace building, duplex buildling, apartment building u otras actividades (comerciales, etc)".

Así, con esa definición se ajusta para el caso de condominio que es apartment building y que el área residencial sería "residencial=apartments". Para el caso de condominios que tienen terrace buildling (pegadas lado a lado, condominio vistas del sol cerca de idif), el área residencial sería residential=terrace.

Qué te parece?

tengo un primo que vive en el bosque sur, le voy a preguntar que averigüe cómo fue aprobado la urbanización respecto a lo residencial y si tiene prohibiciones, tipo cantidad de plantas, si pueden construir dos viviendas en un mismo terreno y esas cosas.
Supaplex (2024-04-06 04:45:58+00:00): 用錯分類，非宗教場地，因此回退

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149639428
relaemanila 2 (2024-04-12 01:57:44+00:00): was to Hualien erathquake
tekim (2024-04-06 16:56:26+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Thanks for your edits to the map, we appreciate it.  Also, thank you for citing your sources, that is important.  I see you cited "Google Maps" and "Waze."  We are not allowed to use either of these when editing OpenStreetMap due to their terms of use.
tekim (2024-04-06 16:56:44+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149663828
Jeremyzzz (2024-04-07 05:11:31+00:00): So ?
Jeremyzzz (2024-04-07 05:12:36+00:00): i've use it (gmaps, and waze) little, and etc is 100% survery or irl survery.
(what is the title of the terms of service?)
Jeremyzzz (2024-04-07 05:13:23+00:00): (Cause i don't know the location little bit) (BTW TYPO IM NOT USING WAZE IM USING GMAPS)
tekim (2024-04-07 19:32:44+00:00): Prohibited conduct... use Google Maps/Google Earth to create or augment any other mapping-related dataset (including a mapping or navigation dataset, business listings database, mailing list, or telemarketing list) for use in a service that is a substitute for, or a substantially similar service to, Google Maps/Google Earth;
adiatmad (2024-04-09 06:23:33+00:00): @Jeremyzzz : Hey, you could also give mobile apps like Vespucci a try for doing live edits while you're out. And if you're interested, feel free to join the OSM Indonesia Telegram too!
(https://t.me/osmindonesia)
N1T3R (2024-04-06 07:05:55+00:00): For such a huge changeset, can you split it into multiple uploads in the future?

Changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Have a look at: "Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering.
mcliquid (2024-04-06 07:42:26+00:00): Good morning, according to Wiki the sub-key "tower:*" would require a "man_made=tower". Does this match with "man_made=mast"?
And shouldn't "description:en" be used for a bilingual description?
Best regards
mcliquid
Jürgen Braunstein (2024-04-06 08:57:07+00:00): Hello,

"Mast" is always man made: Flag pole, TV-tower, ...

I am not sure about your comment about the description.

German: "Lawinensprengsystem am Albonagrat"

English: "Avalanche Safety System at Albonagrat"

Cheers,
Jürgen
mcliquid (2024-04-06 13:44:33+00:00): No problem, I'll adapt it later.
tastrax (2024-04-08 09:29:31+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
infeeeee (2024-04-06 16:01:03+00:00): Szia!

A check_date címkébe kellene a dátumot írni a note helyett: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:check_date

Más programok, pl StreetComplete értelmezni tudják ezt a címkét, és megkérik a felhasználókat bizonyos időközönként, hogy ellenőrizzék, igaz-e még.

A "nem működik" infó is felesleges, ez már jelölve van azzal, hogy disused-ra raktad.
jvaclavik (2024-04-06 07:27:16+00:00): Zapomněl jsem přidat komentář: 
Lezecká oblast "Brná" dle schématu Wiki OSM
YPGGUUY (2024-04-06 07:24:20+00:00): Some bus routes are still broken, please help.
osmviborg (2024-04-06 09:13:00+00:00): maxspeed=50
source:maxspeed=DK:rural
mini-me (2024-04-06 14:19:51+00:00): Надо полагать, в реальности домики не настолько кривые ;) Вы можете выровнять их клавишей Q
angys (2024-04-06 16:12:00+00:00): already got one bus stop there with code
spiregrain (2024-04-06 11:15:01+00:00): Thanks for adding these.   For access, would it be better to have access=emergency (and maybe emergency=designated), or is it literally police only?
nlme (2024-04-09 10:26:53+00:00): Literally police-only per the sticker on it.
spiregrain (2024-04-09 10:42:30+00:00): Thanks!
Christoph Rackwitz (2024-04-06 11:04:53+00:00): Please don't create changesets containing changes that are so far apart from each other. Changesets should be local. Yours covers half of Europe, showing up in the reviews of all those people in the bounding box.
LanternReflector (2024-04-06 11:46:42+00:00): Sorry, I didn't realize that StreetComplete would place these changes in one change set even if I uploaded them separately.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-06 12:04:17+00:00): Have you visited this places that you edited here? Note that if you were close to this points (according to phone GPS) then changeset should be split.

See https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/4582#issuecomment-2041051907
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-06 12:05:00+00:00): (and if you have not visited this places in person: then StreetComplete should not be used, it is for in-person surveying)
LanternReflector (2024-04-06 12:39:40+00:00): All places were visited in person at different time periods (but no further than 3 months ago).
Christoph Rackwitz (2024-04-06 16:05:06+00:00): I understand that SC does this automatically. The developer works closely with the community and I'm sure they'll figure out how to improve SC changesets.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-09 12:20:40+00:00): > but no further than 3 months ago

I would recommend using SC for in-place survey, not for marking what was visited months ago.
BAGgeraar (2025-07-29 07:15:32+00:00): Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1270324536 en https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1270325304: wat betekent oneway:mofa=roundabout?
Geim (2025-07-29 07:37:23+00:00): Dat betekent dat ik een foutje heb gemaakt. Maar dat had je zelf ook wel kunnen bedenken.
BAGgeraar (2025-07-30 07:24:43+00:00): Ja...:) Maar moet het yes of no zijn? De situatie is mij nu niet echt duidelijk.
Filip009 (2024-04-07 07:58:43+00:00): Zdravím, na trase https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14042516 si ste istý tým osmc:symbolom? Podľa smerovníka https://www.freemap.sk/#map=16/48.895230/17.836733&layers=XI&image=555450 to skorej vyzerá na trojriadkové značenie so žltým pásom v strede. Či fakt majú obe trasy vpravo hore žltý trojuholník?
Đuro Jiří (2024-04-15 11:39:00+00:00): Ciao AlbyKitGally96, 
hai aggiunto velocità massima 25 km/h sulla strada Via Fabio Filzi, ma sei sicuro, che questo è velocità giusta?  E inoltre,cosa significa "a"? Meglio scrivere cosa hai fatto, così anche altri sanno,cosa e perché hai fatto.
ivanbranco (2024-04-15 20:55:43+00:00): Vedo che dal 2021 ad oggi non é cambiato nulla...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113906246
Supaplex (2024-04-06 10:50:10+00:00): 請不要以開玩笑心態編輯OpenStreetMap

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149649728
MarinoBM (2024-04-06 21:33:10+00:00): Hola juan_car_23: hace varios años que la Facultad de Ciencias la trasladaron al Campus Miguel Delibes
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100450747/history#map=17/41.66349/-4.70491
El edificio le han remodelado totalmente para acoger las ingenierías industriales.
https://www.eii.uva.es/escuela/index.php?tema=loca
Revísalo.
Un saludo.
MarinoBM (2024-04-08 20:36:10+00:00): He restaurado el nombre y reportado la incidencia al Servicio de Cartografía del Ayuntamiento de Valladolid.
Un saludo.
ivanbranco (2024-09-21 09:40:33+00:00): Hi BikePC,

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1263939863

I wonder why you deleted the smoothness tag from this and other ways?
BikePC (2024-09-21 14:43:34+00:00): Because to my opinion tracktype=grade1 implies smoothness=bad, so correction of over-tagging, the more because it is a dead-ending field road leading to nothing. Remainder of an old road that does not exist anymore.
And question: did you survey that area recently? They are working on it and situation changes. I live quite nearby.
ivanbranco (2024-09-21 21:04:08+00:00): tracktype=grade1 does not imply smoothness=bad (I also asked in the OSM Discord for a feedback). So I think it would be fair to restore such information. If the situation will change the value can always be updated accordingly. Until then I think old data is better than no data.
BikePC (2024-09-22 07:22:44+00:00): I was the latest mapper who did a survey on the ground. An indicator like tracktype was far enough to describe the road quality. Everything more (like lit=no) is useless overkill judging the situation on the ground, not even worth the discussion about it we are having now. 
I agree that tracktype=1 does not imply smoothness=bad. What I meant is that two road quality indicators on that 'road' are overkill and nonsense.
Supaplex (2024-04-06 10:47:35+00:00): 請不要以玩笑心態編輯

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149649625
Supaplex (2024-04-06 10:45:57+00:00): 請不要用玩笑心態編輯

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149649583
Leo Slager (2024-04-06 21:33:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2024-04-07 11:04:04+00:00): Hello Highfidelity, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
silversurfer83 (2024-04-10 08:25:03+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

danke, dass du hilfst die Kartengrundlage zu verbessern.

Zu dieser Änderung eine Frage und eine Anmerkung:

- welcher Routingdienst bzw. welche Karte oder App führt denn hier entlang und wo (ungefähr) liegen Ziel und Start? (um das Problem zu verstehen und einzugrenzen)

- der Wert "residents" ist für den Schlüssel "access" nicht ordentlich definiert. Damit können die Routingalgorythmen praktisch nichts anfangen. Vermutlich ignorieren ihn die meisten dann einfach. Vor deiner Änderung war dort "private" eingetragen was deiner Beschreibung schon sehr gut entspricht. Daher oben meine Frage zum genutzten Dienst.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149646273
tekim (2024-04-06 16:53:27+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Thanks for your edit to the map, we appreciate it.  I see you cited Google Maps as one of your sources.  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Maps when editing OpenStreetMap due to Google's terms of use.