piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
OStreetMapper (2023-08-30 05:42:20+00:00): Thanks! I'll try it out!
OStreetMapper (2023-08-30 05:43:39+00:00): But, out of curiosity, why do we skip that tag?
eggie (2023-08-30 05:48:59+00:00): bicycle=designated is default
We have tree types of cycleways. 

This is the right tagging for cycleways in the Netherlands. It's complicated.. I know. 

G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a 
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 

 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway
OStreetMapper (2023-08-30 05:53:37+00:00): Huh. Now I know! Obviously, I don't live there.
Next thing is to find out what a mofa is. Looking it up now...
eggie (2023-08-30 06:10:41+00:00): In case you don't live in the Netherlands please be careful in changing accesstags.
A mofa is a kind of motorized bicycle with a maxpeed of 25km/h.
In some cities not allowed on the cycleway.(Amsterdam)
A moped is allowed to 45km/h in the city  on the mainroads but on the cycleways 30km/u in the city and outside the city 40km on the cycleway)
OStreetMapper (2023-08-30 06:14:31+00:00): Yeah, I got that. The only access tags I changed were dictated to me by a Fix Me request.
OStreetMapper (2023-08-30 06:15:55+00:00): In this case, mofa is not the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. :D
eggie (2023-08-30 06:22:58+00:00): :)

The rules on cycleways in Europe are all different.
In the Netherlands foot=yes is default on cycleways. In Germany foot=no on cycleways.
In France f.i. it's allowed to bike on footways. Sometimes you must bike on footways. 
Europe is complicated. 
In case you will change accesstags and you are not familiar please be carteful.

And another item...  It has no use to change anything on buildings because from time to time we have an update from the BAG (Dutch Registry)

For what reason you are mapping in the Netherlands?
OStreetMapper (2023-08-30 06:27:28+00:00): I found a challenge on MapRoulette to add Wikidata tags to features that had a brand tag but no brand:wikidata tag.
OStreetMapper (2023-08-30 06:28:30+00:00): I'm not sure I'll ever move to Europe now. :)
OStreetMapper (2023-08-30 06:29:25+00:00): Also, from now on I think I'll stick to the challenge.
eggie (2023-08-30 06:35:05+00:00): Behalve of the buildings and accesstags I agree...

Enjoy further mapping  :)
eggie
validator
eggie (2023-08-29 20:44:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
feedback  source=BAG hersteld

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
JassKurn (2023-08-30 13:58:29+00:00): Hi,

You've changed a large number of "footway" to "path", but have not added the access tags needed for path. For many of these footway/paths in this area it is illegal to use a bicycle or horse, but your changes suggest access for horses & bicycles.

The Path tag is a bit of mess, and without access tags implies the way only prohibits motor vehicle use. And there is not way to confidently know surface type.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=path

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Richard/diary/20333

I agree with using Path for for these informal rural ways, and had been looking to replace footway with path across Dartmoor But it must be done with the addition of access tags, and surface tags. The need is greater in Dartmoor as it's illegal for horse & bicycle to use most "paths", unless they are specifically allowed (eg bridleways access)

For most conversions I'd suggest something like

highway=path
foot=yes
vehicle=no
horse=no
surface=grass
smoothness=*
lit=no

and maybe informal=yes
Jenseblume (2023-08-30 15:21:00+00:00): Hi,

thanks for your good explanation. Now I understand, what i did wrong.
I'll fix it and started already.

Thanks,
Jens
user_5359 (2023-08-30 07:59:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only name and description, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.

There is also information how to enter addresses correctly
eggie (2023-08-30 05:21:52+00:00): Dag Tom.. Die naam heb ik verwijderd.
Hier staan meer bedrijven verkeerd.
MVG
eggie
IguanaPablo (2023-09-11 19:18:26+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta.
Awoobis (2023-08-29 20:41:30+00:00): Hello, it doesn't appear that redrawn road matches bing imagery? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1203301968#map=17/35.59951/68.52469&layers=G
cserpell (2023-08-31 01:31:04+00:00): Esto no es un parque.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140559007
cserpell (2023-08-31 01:32:03+00:00): Esto no es un parque.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140559080
os-emmer (2023-12-27 00:19:46+00:00): Hi Eebie,
here you mapped something as landuse=landuse. That was probably a typo, wasn't it?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1203303282
Eebie (2023-12-29 09:30:21+00:00): It is corrected.
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-30 01:21:25+00:00): 'Changeset reverted.  Access tags should be used instead, rather than just mass deleting "private" driveways.

You can read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140564424
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-30 00:57:08+00:00): Why did you delete a bunch of driveways?
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-30 01:00:26+00:00): 'Changeset reverted.  Access tags should be used instead, rather than just mass deleting "private" driveways.

You can read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140563985
GerdP (2023-09-06 08:50:54+00:00): Den falsch erfassten Kreisel in Essen hätte ich auch schon bemerken sollen. Habe den Knotenpunkt 29 aber jetzt mit dem highway=mini_roundabout Knoten verschmolzen:
https://www.osm.org/changeset/140883879
und die Routen-Relationen, die durch das Trennen der "Lange Straße" "kaputtgegangen" sind:
https://www.osm.org/changeset/140884570
Nach so einem Auftrennen in zwei Teile mit oneway=yes solltest Du die Rollen in den Routen-Relationen anschauen. Da ist dann meist die Rolle forward notwendig und evtl. die Korrektur der Reihenfolge.
NGL-engel (2023-09-08 18:28:26+00:00): Hallo GerdP
Normalerweise achte ich darauf, aber wie Du festgestellt hast, habe ich es wohl an dieser Stelle übersehen. 
Danke!
Du erwähnst eine Reihenfolge bei Routen-Relationen - ich war bis jetzt davon ausgegangen das die Reihenfolge der Abschnitte egal ist.
GerdP (2023-09-08 18:41:40+00:00): Bei vielen Relationen ist das so, bei Routen nicht. Da sollen die Member sortiert sein. Schwierig wird das, wenn z.B. Radrouten rechts und links einer Straße entlang laufen. Dann braucht man die Rollen forward bzw. backward, und die Logik dabei ist nicht gerade offensichtlich. Siehe auch meine Beitrag hier: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/forward-backward-rollen-ich-kapiers-nicht/4601
NGL-engel (2023-09-08 20:09:25+00:00): Hallo, 
  forward/backward kannte ich tatsächlich schon. Ich fand es auch nicht so schwierig ;-) Hatte aber auch nur "normale" Straßen/Fahrradwege. Deinen Beitrag schaue ich mir auf alle Fälle an - man lernt nicht aus.
Mammi71 (2025-08-05 19:15:55+00:00): erfüllt leider nicht alle Voraussetzungen: in Teilabschnitten (zumindest südöstlich von Friedrichshafen) gibt es nur gestrichelte Mittellinie, man darf überdie Gegenfahrbahn fahrend überholen, das schließt trunk aus.
seewäldler (2025-08-06 12:17:51+00:00): Da wollte ich mich schon länger mal dranmachen aber erst mal abwarten, ob ich der einzige bin dem das nicht gefällt. Zwischen FN-Kitzenwiese und der Anschlussstelle zur A96 ist Überholen auf der B31 immer mal wieder erlaubt, das widerspricht "trunk" fundamental. Ich finde, für alles auf diesem Stück wäre "primary" richtig.
Mammi71 (2025-08-06 21:03:30+00:00): wir können das gerne im Forum ausdiskutieren: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/uneinigkeit-bei-link-klassifizierung-was-ist-der-aktuelle-konsens/133707

Lediglich der Abschnitt Eriskirch zwischen Ost und West würde als trunk durchhehen.
cserpell (2023-08-31 01:32:22+00:00): Esto no es un paque.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140559791
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-30 00:55:12+00:00): 'Changeset reverted.  Access tags should be used instead, rather than just mass deleting "private" driveways.

You can read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140563917
limes11 (2023-11-26 09:38:20+00:00): Moin. 

Ich habe diese Inselchen mal einen place-tag spendiert.

Gibt es Hinweise auf ein Schutzgebiet? Im LANIS findet sich nichts dazu. Privat?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156568050

VG

Limes
user_17551983 (2023-11-26 16:46:42+00:00): Hi, darüber weiß ich leider nichts; vorort war ich auch noch nicht. Ist vielleicht nur ein einsamer Angelsportsee.
Sollte bei	protected_area nicht noch die tags protect_class + protection_title dazu?
limes11 (2023-11-26 17:05:22+00:00): Sollte schon ja. Du hattest das vor drei Monaten gesetzt, allerdings kann das auch eine automatische Korrektur des landuse=conservation gewesen sein, was hier vor 11 Jahren erfasst wurde. Da es nicht mehr überprüfbar ist und es keinerlei offizielle Daten zu einem Schutzgebiet gibt, entferne ich das. Danke!
user_17551983 (2023-11-26 18:33:36+00:00): ja, wahrscheinlich nur korrigiert, nicht selber gesetzt. vg
Aerond (2023-08-30 05:11:03+00:00): Tackar!
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-30 00:54:38+00:00): 'Changeset reverted.  Access tags should be used instead, rather than just mass deleting "private" driveways.

You can read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140563904
felipeeugenio (2023-08-31 12:05:24+00:00): Hola Camilo. una gran parte del pasto que dibujaste no es pasto si quiera. NO hacemos dibujos esquemáticos en zonas verdes poniendo un polígono que lo cubra todo. Además borraste la estación intermodal por completo.
Lo mismo con las casas que dibujaste en quilín. ha tomado varios minutos reparar todas esas formas que hiciste sin fijarte mucho en la forma actual de la casa. Por favor dedicarle un poco mas de tiempo al mapeo, que no podemos estar revisando todo lo que haces. gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140560347
HirschKauz (2023-10-11 10:03:28+00:00): Hi! 
Diese Changeset ist nicht korrekt. Ein gesperrter Weg wird mit access=* getaggt. So wie es jetzt getaggt ist, ist der komplette Weg ein Zaun. Auch der Zaun am südlichen Ende ist sinnfrei. Ein node (Punkt) auf dem Weg mit einer barrier=* wäre besser.
Frage: Ist der Weg immer noch zu? Auf neuen Orthophotos scheint er wieder zu existieren...
VG
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-30 03:02:36+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140566347
kwiatek_123 (2023-08-30 10:05:36+00:00): Zamiast description w https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1203313928 może lepszy byłby https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:hazard%3Dillegal_crossing ? Poza tym access=no raczej dotyczy też rowerów
alexey_zakharenkov (2023-09-02 16:15:18+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Не надо рисовать съезды там, где их нет. Я имею в виду линию https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1203314610.
Также прочитайте, пожалуйста, как в РФ проставляются статусы съездам: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification#Специальные_типы

С уважением,
Алексей
alexey_zakharenkov (2023-09-06 11:40:00+00:00): Если есть сомнения в состоянии разметки, то Bing там очень старый, а вот панорамы от 2022 года, где выделенного съезда нет: https://clck.ru/35bcrd

При зачистке надо бы удалить все сопутствующие объекты - точки, где присоединялся съезд, и связанные запреты разворотов.
oleinap (2023-09-07 13:33:08+00:00): точки удалить не понимаю как - при удалении точек убиваются линии дорог к перекрёстку.
Подскажите как удалить точки, чтобы линии дорог остались.
Связанные запреты разворотов удалил при предыдущей правке, когда удалил съезд
empty_child (2023-08-30 08:49:15+00:00): Hello Pacha Tchernof,
Please, don't connect buildings with landuses (and streets neither). It's a hard work to disconnect them all
Pacha Tchernof (2023-09-03 20:54:25+00:00): Hello empty_child,
thank you for letting me know
i2004 (2023-08-29 23:27:15+00:00): estaba mal seccionada el ramal del 21
AgusQui (2023-08-29 23:44:15+00:00): Ramal La Noria - Saavedra no funciona, el semi en hora pico nada más
SunnyIsland10 (2023-08-29 21:51:31+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2022-11-28
muralito (2023-08-30 02:35:30+00:00): Estimado i2004.
Las vias highway no se mapean una arriba de la otra superpuestas.
busway implica una via separada para los bondis... asi que en caso de ser real que exista, no se mapea arriba de la tertiary, sino a un costado. Gracias.
Frans S (2023-08-31 10:10:23+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Please do not add a layer to a building to hide an error. Just map it and adjust the building.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140561214
trigpoint (2024-07-28 15:45:55+00:00): Hi
I am wondering why you have changed a road, that clearly provides access to a house, to a path which will prevent vehicle access?

Rather than private=yes you should use access=private.

Cheers Phil
impiaaa (2023-08-30 18:04:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use more detail than "fix" in the changeset description--what did you change and why? For example, "Reclassified service road in SCUSD Farm." More examples here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Also, "unclassified road" is, confusingly, a classification, used for minor public roads. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified I think "service road" or "track road" is better for farm roads.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-09-02 23:27:05+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140562115
rskedgell (2023-08-30 11:17:24+00:00): Are these roads actually private access (typically gated), or private ownership (unadopted roads owned by the property developer)?

If it's the latter, tagging as ownership=private + access=destination may be a better fit, as they should be available to routing software for visitors, deliveries, taxis, etc.
Millenium0012 (2023-08-30 11:46:20+00:00): Thanks for the feedback, rskedgell. I agree, and I have changed a portion of the road to be private ownership only. For the rest, they are indeed gated so private access only.
rskedgell (2023-08-30 12:13:26+00:00): Many thanks.
Langlaeufer (2023-08-30 10:28:08+00:00): Hallo Wermark.

Bzgl. des Wegs
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1
55862049

im Norden steht ein veraltetes motor_car=agricultural;destination
An den anderen Einfahrten existiert keine Beschilderung, d.h. für den Weg existiert kein wirksames Verbot - oder hat sich die Beschilderung kürzlich geändert?
wermak (2023-08-30 11:22:53+00:00): Habe das destination erstmal wieder entfernt.

Schöne Grüße
Langlaeufer (2023-08-30 11:25:58+00:00): Danke dir. Das Schild scheint mir irgendwie so ein lokaler Versuch den Durchgangsverkehr zu reduzieren ohne die Gewohnheiten der örtlichen Bevölkerung zu beeinträchtigen.
Langlaeufer (2023-08-30 12:04:26+00:00): Ich hab mal motorcar:backward an den nördlichen Teil gesetzt. Irgendwie scheint hier Jeder weg anders und webb nur einseitig zu einer Hauptstraße beschildert zu sein. Siehe auch:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3715467
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140562179
EP_Repair (2023-09-21 01:56:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 141536278 where the changeset comment is: Reverting trail deletions of public trails that are mapped by the county and easy to see on aerial
emersonveenstra (2023-08-30 11:56:19+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your contribution! Generally for addresses, the best way to add them is to draw the house, click on it, and then fill in the address fields there. That way all the apps can render it. The way you have it right now means nothing can use it. Hope this helps!
DressyPear4 (2023-08-30 16:39:46+00:00): Mais atenção ao mover o mapa para não deslocar nós
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140562717
HellMap (2023-08-30 09:40:58+00:00): Just a note that these footways need indoor tagging scheme rather than covered=yes or similar.
richlv (2023-08-30 10:47:34+00:00): Probably, I was following the simpler approach that's feasible in a mobile editor for me - hopefully that's easier to update once the approximate layout is there :)
LockOnGuy (2023-09-08 18:37:43+00:00): Hi Amiri♧,      
Please do use meaningful changeset comments - “...” does not help other mappers understand what you are doing.                    
Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments       
Regards.
AndresDuhour (2023-09-14 01:34:19+00:00): Hola! quería comentarte sobre el cambio en el Cycles motor club. La etiqueta highway=raceway se aplica a la pista exclusivamente. Para el área que engloba la zona donde se practica el deporte se debe usar  leisure=sports_centre. En la wiki está expresado: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Draceway. Por eso había hecho ese cambio hace un tiempo. Saludos! Andrés
AndresDuhour (2023-09-14 10:14:56+00:00): Hola! estoy leyendo con más detalle y está bien aplicado para el caso del motocross si la pista no está bien definida y se usa toda el área. Seguramente es ese el caso, debés conocer el lugar. Yo me guié por la imagen bing en la que se ve una pista definida que ya está mapeada. En todo caso, yo pensaría en agregar el nombre del sitio en otra área o en un nodo en vez de en el polígono que está como highway=raceway. Saludos! Andrés
user_5359 (2023-08-30 07:47:11+00:00): Hello! PPlease have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1203368998. What is the mean of the tag capacity = 0?
BCNorwich (2023-08-30 07:44:42+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Just to let you know that a house name is not derived from the number and road name. Therefore names like 11 Larkin Close are incorrect and should be removed.

Regards Bernard.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 06:38:27+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145277723
astro_furball (2023-09-27 15:40:13+00:00): Whatever the perceived ambiguity of usage=industrial (which I don't see), surely usage=main is completely unsuitable for this line.
Warin61 (2023-09-06 02:01:29+00:00): Hi,
I have altered this. 

Relation outer ways cannot touch .. so a relation does not work here. 

The church building now has the tags that were on the relation - service times syntax corrected. 
The other building simply tagged building=yes. 

Think that should do?
SunbrightRd (2023-09-08 01:53:35+00:00): Yes, thanks!
tolioalessandro (2023-09-05 16:22:23+00:00): Ciao Fedurli,
come ben sai la definizione di trunk è in discussione qui:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/utilizzo-del-tag-highway-trunk-in-italia/101471/

Fare mass editing declassando trunk in primary, in nome di una definizione imposta unilaterlamente alla comunità, in contrasto con tutte le altre pagine wiki e per giunta in fase di discussione, è una mancanza di rispetto nei confronti di tutti gli utenti che stanno pazientemente prendendo parte alla discussione.

Inoltre stai declassando strade nelle aree geografiche più disparate della penisola italiana. Limitati ad intervenire nelle aree che conosci personalmente.

Sei pregato di riportare le strade che hai declassato come le hai trovate, in attesa che si arrivi ad una definizione condivisa. Quello che stai facendo è un atto vandalico.


Inoltre nominare tutti i changeset "aggiornamento" non aiuta certo a capire cosa tu abbia fatto. Puoi essere più esaustivo nella spiegazione, ad esempio potevi dire "declassamento da trunk a primary" e la località o la strada dove sei intervenuto.

Alessandro
ZeLonewolf (2023-09-09 00:15:47+00:00): This road has a sign at the end that reads:

HARBOR VIEW DRIVE
PRIVATE
DO NOT ENTER

Therefore I am restoring the private access tagging and mapping the gate and inscription.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 06:36:41+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145277679
Tomas Straupis (2023-08-30 05:01:54+00:00): These are not static elements. Take a look at different ortophotos - they are in different positions. Therefore they do not belong to the map data.
watmildon (2023-08-31 06:42:19+00:00): Hello! There's a bit of a data issue with the Rapid address feed right now. If you happen to know the addr:city for these it would be good to get them patched up as "Unincorporated" isn't a real postal city. ha.

Just a heads up. I've posted about it here:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/esri-address-feed-update-has-some-issues/103132
RoadGeek_MD99 (2023-09-01 16:44:25+00:00): Thanks!  I was trying to fix them as soon I created them, but a few Unincorporated cities slipped by.  I've used Overpass to clean up all of them in Howard County.
watmildon (2023-09-01 18:32:09+00:00): No worries at all. It's quite sneaky!
Supaplex (2023-08-30 02:12:30+00:00): Hi,

能否解說移動宗教崇拜場所
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7053626732
移動至自來水廠內，看起來並不大合理
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140564312
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 06:36:35+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145277677
impiaaa (2023-08-30 18:01:40+00:00): Please make sure to save your changes in one area before moving to another, so that the changeset bounding box only covers relevant areas.
AngocA (2023-09-18 02:27:05+00:00): Hola, Acabo de escribirte en el otro changeset sobre el motivo de estos cambios, ya que no entendemos por qué hubo este borrado masivo.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140565841
https://github.com/OSMLatam/pow/issues/19
AngocA (2023-09-18 02:19:29+00:00): Hola Veeduría,
Vemos que has contribuido recientemente al mapa. Sin embargo, vemos que has borrado muchas vías. Quisiéramos saber por qué?
Se ha creado un tiquete para tal motivo: https://github.com/OSMLatam/pow/issues/19
multichill (2024-03-16 21:53:18+00:00): Why did you tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/265183937 as a station?
ivanbranco (2023-09-01 20:25:52+00:00): Hi Fizzie41,

I don't know if someone reported it already but apparently someone reverted your revert and then deleted their account, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140692285
ivanbranco (2023-09-01 20:32:20+00:00): Probably a sockpuppet of https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/meowscle6969
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-02 03:12:52+00:00): Thanks, Ivan. Yes, we are across it.
tastrax (2023-09-23 11:47:24+00:00): What the story with this path? https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&way=1203391584#map=18/-8.56652/125.59611

Looks like an error to me?