piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-02 11:05:46+00:00): Is that what she told you?

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values

https://osm.org/changeset/184969132
dknelson9876 (2026-07-05 20:24:44+00:00): Thank you for your contributions to the map! Unfortunately, I’m not sure this edit belongs. OSM is intended to be a map as things are on the ground, and that means a business mapped on a house stood out to me. I checked out the website you added and couldn’t find any addresses for (potential) customers to visit, which is a pretty good sign that this business location is not intended to be public and therefore doesn’t belong on the map.

I’d appreciate if you can demonstrate otherwise, such as with an image of signage posted outside. If not, I intend to revert your changes after one week.
ika-chan! (2026-07-01 19:51:02+00:00): Hi, the road removed can be confirmed with Mapbox Satellite imagery, as of 1 July 2026. I have reinstated the way with the source=* tag added, in hopes that any confusion will be reduced.
Taya_S (2026-07-01 11:33:15+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184908933
Filip009 (2026-07-02 18:19:34+00:00): Zdravím, včera som tam išiel a žiadnu cyklotrasu som v tomto úseku nevidel. Viete prosím priložiť fotografie, že fakt v teréne existuje? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20441940
JJIglesias (2026-07-02 00:59:41+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Te sugerimos poner multiples edificaciones por cada conjunto de cambios (Changeset)

Gracias
rajdhani (2026-07-01 05:32:35+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184894648
iuvi (2026-07-01 14:40:59+00:00): Hi! How to get latest 2025 images? Thanks
Sisikottos (2026-07-01 19:03:36+00:00): Hi! Use https://www.openstreetmap.org and press Control+Shift+B and check several map layers to see what the latest is.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-02 14:23:40+00:00): Reverted series of changesets adding SEO POI and blatantly promotional description=* and other malformed tags to it

https://osm.org/changeset/184979004
Piskvor (2026-07-01 07:25:44+00:00): Ahoj, teď jsem jel kolem, a asi je to z hlediska mapy jedno - ale ta nástupiště už tam nejsou, fyzicky rozebrali zastřešení, a teď bourají samotná nástupiště. Nové koleje budou v nové poloze, a k nim (někdy) budou nová nástupiště. Pokládal jsem za vhodnější nemást cestující veřejnost, když reálně existuje už jen nástupiště 4/5 - proto jsem 2/3 a 1 označil jako removed:*

Nicméně nebudu se o to přetahovat, vzhledem k tomu, že tu stavbu aktualizuješ šířeji a přesněji - za což děkuji.

Mapování zdar, 
Piškvor
Bilykralik16 (2026-07-01 10:30:09+00:00): Ahoj, díky za zprávu. Každopádně jde o to, že přibližně za tři týdny by se výluka měla překlopit a zůstanou pouze koleje 1 a 2. Naopak 4. a 5. kolej se vytrhají (viz měsíční plány výluk, které jsou dostupné i veřejně: https://provoz.spravazeleznic.cz/Portal/ViewArticle.aspx?oid=2280018). Takže i když nástupiště jako taková jsou na východní straně částečně zbořené (jak jsem koukal v pondělí), kolej 1 má střechu napůl a koleje 2/3 už vůbec, tak by část obou nástupišť (uvidíme, co zbytek střechy u 1. koleje) měly ještě zůstat v "původní" podobě nějakou dobu.
Piskvor (2026-07-01 10:34:05+00:00): Aha, tak až do téhle úrovně informovanosti jsem nedošel, já to beru "jak to vidím v terénu." Díky za upřesnění, teď to dává smysl :)
Bilykralik16 (2026-07-01 10:56:35+00:00): Jasný, není zač :)
ralley (2026-07-02 00:31:03+00:00): What do you mean by capacity=150?  This is meant to be "The total number of vehicles which can be charged at the same time" as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
Liam McCready O'Neil (2026-07-02 03:44:37+00:00): Thanks, this was a mistake on my part. I have now corrected this information to present the vehicle capacity (4).
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-02 14:23:30+00:00): Reverted series of changesets adding SEO POI and blatantly promotional description=* and other malformed tags to it

https://osm.org/changeset/184979004
Ruslan Fatih (2026-07-19 07:43:55+00:00): Why you change the name to "name	Улица 37" ?
Ezra Edwards (2026-07-19 09:08:06+00:00): "Sorry about that! It happened by mistake—I was copying tags from another highway and accidentally included the name. Could you please fix it? Thanks!"
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-01 06:20:51+00:00): Thanks for adding this information. I just want to make sure the tagging is correct: are values like YY11, YY07, RIP 1 and RIP 2 official/public track names, or are they internal track references from the source data?

If they are track references, they may be better mapped with ref=* or railway:track_ref=* instead of name=*
Frans S (2026-07-01 14:14:58+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not move hi rise buildings which are correct placed on their footprint back to the visible roof.


Please check this footage on how to map High and  hi-rise buildings.

https://youtu.be/u31wPYWkm3E?si=lDbvDutpUyZWQXXL

A more extended explanation with samples can be seen here
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling#Drawing_at_the_roof

Best regards
felipeeugenio (2026-06-30 21:40:49+00:00): 
Note	Contributor	⏱️ Last updated	Action	Comment
5367151 (iD)	felipeeugenio	~ 18 minutes ago	closed	ok
5367152 (iD)	felipeeugenio	~ 18 minutes ago	closed	ok
5367148 (iD)	felipeeugenio	~ 18 minutes ago	closed	ok
5367134 (iD)	felipeeugenio	~ 18 minutes ago	closed	ok
5367135 (iD)	felipeeugenio	~ 18 minutes ago	closed	ok
5367149 (iD)	felipeeugenio	~ 18 minutes ago	closed	ok
5367136 (iD)	felipeeugenio	~ 18 minutes ago	closed	ok
5367150 (iD)	felipeeugenio	~ 18 minutes ago	closed	ok
JJIglesias (2026-07-02 00:59:21+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Te sugerimos poner multiples edificaciones por cada conjunto de cambios (Changeset)

Gracias
mtb_93 (2026-07-17 08:18:35+00:00): In the FIXME note, I swapped Bing and Mapbox 2026. Mapbox 2026 is more recent. I believe the chronological sequence is: Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta - Bing Maps Aerial - Mapbox Satellite - Esri World Imagery.
JJIglesias (2026-07-02 00:58:18+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
pwbriggs (2026-07-02 05:37:47+00:00): Thanks!
SafwatHalaby (2026-07-03 15:51:30+00:00): Hello Eliyahu! I noticed you've lately done quite a few edits in Haifa region and I thought I'd add some comments here.

1. Sometimes you move around roads only slightly, for example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/937325094 - are you aligning the roads with satellite imagery? Please be very careful with that. The satellite imagery must be aligned first, there is an explanation here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/He:Aerial_imagery_quickstart (english version here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aerial_imagery_quickstart)

2. in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183179518 you described t he change as "sidewalks" but it's clearly much more than that. Since you're doing massive changes it would be very helpful to be descriptive.

3. You've added lots of fords, for example here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13879138918

Are these existing on the ground? If this is an attempt to silence editor warnings this would not be good practice. I know some of the waterways are auto-imported and poorly mapped, so it's very possible that there are less fords/no fords on the ground and the waterway is slightly different.
eliyahu bowers  𐤀𐤋𐤉𐤄𐤅 𐤁𐤅𐤅𐤓𐤎 (2026-07-05 16:36:22+00:00): 1. 
I am generally aligning with satellite imagery and assuming that given the surrounding features align with the imagery (larger roads buildings) the ones I am editing should too. I will be more careful going forward.

2. 
I will do my best to be more descriptive in the future and to separate change sets into more consistent groups.

3.
I am not sure what to do in this instance. As with many trails in israel the trail closely follows the water. (This I have seen in the places I have marked) So I did not think it completely wrong to mark it that way to silence the editor. However It may be better to move it to one side of the stream, to stack the two , or to remove the path. I have not seen clear guidelines on this.
SafwatHalaby (2026-07-12 15:18:55+00:00): regarding 3: It is DEFINITELY to keep the editor warnings than it is to introduce false data only to satisfy the editor's warning heuristics. Fords are a very specific physical feature that you usually see only by going outdoors.

The longer term solution is fixing the badly mapped, auto imported waterways by going outdoors. I do this in the Carmel/Haifa region from time to time but it's a slow process. Previously I had proposed removing the bad quality auto-waterway-import but that didn't take off: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mass-removal-of-intermittent-waterway-in-the-carmel-region/126821
SafwatHalaby (2026-07-12 15:19:33+00:00): Minor typo: I meant to say "it is definitely better to keep the editor warnings than..."
SafwatHalaby (2026-07-12 15:22:31+00:00): Regarding 1: The carmel region is notoriously misaligned because the terrain is nonflat. Your most reliable anchor is the GPX tracks, not the existing mapping. 

Again, this guide is your friend: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aerial_imagery_quickstart

On a few occasions I moved the existing roads slightly in Haifa to properly align them with the GPX tracks.

Also, I noticed you used Mapbox imagery from time to time, from my experience in Haifa ESRI is newer in most regions if I remember correctly.
eliyahu bowers  𐤀𐤋𐤉𐤄𐤅 𐤁𐤅𐤅𐤓𐤎 (2026-07-12 16:15:09+00:00): As aforementioned I had been to most of the trails I had marked up in the carmel. I'm still not quite clear on what the best course of action is when the path is the river bed. (Just ignore the editor?)

I was using Bing imagery before knowing I could change it. When I did I went around comparing using construction sites and I found Mapbox and ESRI to be quite similar but I will pay attention to it if I see things significantly out of date.
pwbriggs (2026-07-02 05:36:49+00:00): Hello,

Why did you remove brand tags from these POIs? Are the brands currently mapped not correct, yet the names are? Please discuss here to clarify what you meant to do.

Thanks
pwbriggs (2026-07-02 05:35:05+00:00): Looks good; thanks for the contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Gaung Tebono (2026-06-30 23:00:05+00:00): Please read the previous changes, there is even a DWG that also provided feedback on this discussion
NaufalFarras (2026-06-30 23:28:40+00:00): DWG encouraged discussion, which we cannot do effectively in changeset comment. Moreover, you keep reverting edits since a few weeks ago, which made it harder to have comprehensive discussion.
Glassman (2026-07-01 16:05:22+00:00): Looks like you accidentially dragged a service way. It has heen fixed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184882516
Glassman (2026-07-01 16:14:42+00:00): another dragged node
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184883040
Gaung Tebono (2026-07-01 06:44:39+00:00): Sorry, Open Street Maps (OSM) has different terminology than the basic government regulations regarding road status. If the status written on the OSM Wiki is still the same as government regulations, the explanation should be changed as much as possible so as not to cause confusion for contributors who want to edit.
JJIglesias (2026-07-02 00:57:51+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
JJIglesias (2026-07-02 00:57:23+00:00): Saludos Marisol y gracias por tu aporte. Te sugerimos que dibujes multiples edificios en 1 solo conjunto de cambios y luego salves y subas toda esa data. Estas haciendo 1 Changeset por cada edificio y eso satura el control de Cambios que hacen otros mapeadores.
Gracias
Marisol López Galvis (2026-07-02 16:52:55+00:00): Hola Julio, muchas gracias por tú recomendación, eso haré!
Gaung Tebono (2026-07-01 06:41:51+00:00): In OSM, it's not mandatory to follow government regulations regarding road classification, as road classification status in OSM is dynamic, not static. It could be that the road classification in OSM has increased in level because the traffic level is quite high, so it requires a more appropriate classification for high traffic.
Gaung Tebono (2026-07-01 06:41:05+00:00): In OSM, it's not mandatory to follow government regulations regarding road classification, as road classification status in OSM is dynamic, not static. It could be that the road classification in OSM has increased in level because the traffic level is quite high, so it requires a more appropriate classification for high traffic.
Glassman (2026-07-01 16:16:15+00:00): Question - did the library keep the same phone nmber as the former market?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184886561
Ielenia (2026-07-08 06:14:41+00:00): Looks like this is a duplicate of openstreetmap.org/node/13869147544, I'm going to merge it with that and also add the correct phone number (as well as links to their facebook page which is their primary point of contact as they have no website)
caprieldeluca (2026-07-01 01:56:19+00:00): Hola, gracias por colaborar con el mapa. Corregí un nodo duplicado en Diagonal Norte y Calle 8 bis.
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto
caprieldeluca (2026-07-01 02:03:48+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa! Revisé este conjunto de cambios y se ve bien para mí.
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto
leyberguerra (2026-07-01 01:37:01+00:00): Modificar la posición del encuadre
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184887770
leyberguerra (2026-07-01 01:34:52+00:00): Corrige la posición del encuadre
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184887772
Glassman (2026-07-01 16:18:41+00:00): when adding a business inside of a building, if the business doesn't occupy the entire bldg, just add a node for the business. Can you fix the H&R Block you added?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184888584
lakedistrict (2026-07-01 08:30:36+00:00): You have changed the website to one belonging to a campsite 100 miles away in Derbyshire. Please correct your edit.
BaiMasterDoctor (2026-07-01 08:51:36+00:00): sorry, should double check
Glassman (2026-07-01 16:19:57+00:00): #TIP: include a tag to describe what type of service the business offers.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184888819
rajdhani (2026-07-03 07:45:12+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185024379
felipeeugenio (2026-07-01 13:50:59+00:00): Hola. Le estás agregando los tags del crossing al footway que pasa cruzando los crossings, pero no al crossing mismo.
no sé si está necesariamente mal el agregarselos al footway, pero dejar el crossing sin nada mas no me parece que esté bien.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184889049
FajrAl (2026-07-02 02:10:38+00:00): OpenStreetMap bukanlah tempat untuk bercanda, bahan politik, atau spam iklan
JJIglesias (2026-07-02 00:54:50+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
pwbriggs (2026-07-02 05:33:26+00:00): Robinswood is already mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160075094 and shouldn't be duplicated onto a point.

Is "Black Nugget Tennis" a real name (e.g. written on a sign, etc.) or something made-up to describe this feature? Check out the wiki page at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Invented_and_real_names
Waffelo (2026-07-02 07:46:13+00:00): nemyslím si že sa to takto volá :D
kiwichickenmusician (2026-07-02 07:52:23+00:00): Hej dík, to byla nějaká editace z kapsy nezamklé navigace
Waffelo (2026-07-02 08:42:03+00:00): vpohode, stáva sa
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184890237
pwbriggs (2026-07-02 05:27:55+00:00): The consensus accepted tag for Home Depot is shop=doityourself, not hardware. If you think the latter would be more appropriate at this particular location, please share why.

According to the OSM wiki, shop=pharmacy is a deprecated tag, and amenity=pharmacy was correct.

I've undone these changes; please reach out if you ave any questions. Thanks for the contributions!
pwbriggs (2026-07-02 05:23:18+00:00): These businesses were both already mapped on their respective building outlines, and shouldn't be duplicated.
pwbriggs (2026-07-02 05:18:23+00:00): Why did you remove brand tags from Marshalls? If Marshalls is no longer here, please update the name of the store as well.
pwbriggs (2026-07-02 05:19:28+00:00): The library information is already mapped on the building outline at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92830944 and shouldn't be duplicated onto another point.
Wildsharky (2026-07-06 10:37:43+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185033073
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-07-01 12:29:57+00:00): There is a department store inside the municipal swimming pool area? Please validate or remove.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-07-04 20:18:20+00:00): fixed
okadatsuneo (2026-07-01 04:03:56+00:00): 勝手な値 "building:levels=2" を入れないで下さいと別のコメントで書きましたが、まだ同様の編集をされるのでしょうか？
gc27 (2026-07-01 04:54:31+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Automated_edits OSMの指針を確認してください
nyampire (2026-07-01 12:23:15+00:00): こんにちは、OSM Foundation Japanのいいだ（nyampire）と申します。

OSMありがとうございます、OSMへようこそ、、、

と言いたいところですが、あなたの行っている編集はいったんすべてリバート（巻き戻し）させていただきます。
理由は以下のとおりです。

* 編集に利用しているデータが、基盤地図情報の可能性が極めて高い。基盤地図情報のデータインポートは、ライセンスの競合により、許可されていません。
* 事前に相談されていないインポートである。OSMはインポートなどの大規模編集を行う際、Import Guidelineに従った手続きを事前に行う必要があります。
* 事前に相談されていない組織的編集である。金沢周辺を対象に、いくつかのアカウントがほぼ同じ活動をしています。組織として作業を行う場合、組織的編集のガイドラインに従う必要があります。

その他、投入されたデータは、既に描かれた建物と重複して登録されているなど、データ品質の面からも看過できない状況となっています。

また、別のアカウントからコメントをいただき、大学の研究でデータを利用したい、ということを伺いました。
それであれば、代替となるデータセットの紹介や、別アプローチでのアクションなども相談させていただきます。
nyampire@gmail.com までメールをいただけるよう、お手数ではありますが、指導教官あるいはリーダーに状況のエスカレーションを行ってください。
必要に応じてWeb会議などもセット可能です。
yelisey90 (2026-07-16 20:15:56+00:00): partly reverted: no through access here according to all the maps & street-level photos, but no idea why is it impossible; the road should added only after on-the-ground examination

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185867126
gc27 (2026-07-01 05:16:28+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Automated_edits 機械的編集についてOSMコミュニティの方針を確認してください
nyampire (2026-07-01 12:21:10+00:00): こんにちは、OSM Foundation Japanのいいだ（nyampire）と申します。

OSMありがとうございます、OSMへようこそ、、、

と言いたいところですが、あなたの行っている編集はいったんすべてリバート（巻き戻し）させていただきます。
理由は以下のとおりです。

* 編集に利用しているデータが、基盤地図情報の可能性が極めて高い。基盤地図情報のデータインポートは、ライセンスの競合により、許可されていません。
* 事前に相談されていないインポートである。OSMはインポートなどの大規模編集を行う際、Import Guidelineに従った手続きを事前に行う必要があります。
* 事前に相談されていない組織的編集である。金沢周辺を対象に、いくつかのアカウントがほぼ同じ活動をしています。組織として作業を行う場合、組織的編集のガイドラインに従う必要があります。

その他、投入されたデータは、既に描かれた建物と重複して登録されているなど、データ品質の面からも看過できない状況となっています。

また、別のアカウントからコメントをいただき、大学の研究でデータを利用したい、ということを伺いました。
それであれば、代替となるデータセットの紹介や、別アプローチでのアクションなども相談させていただきます。
nyampire@gmail.com までメールをいただけるよう、お手数ではありますが、指導教官あるいはリーダーに状況のエスカレーションを行ってください。
必要に応じてWeb会議などもセット可能です。
user_8655426 (2026-07-01 11:38:44+00:00): こんにちは。
ホテルの更新、ありがとうございます！
偶然ですが、今日の夕方、見てきました。(だもんで、帰宅後にこの変更セットを見て、びっくりしました。)
立体駐車場の看板も新しくなっていたので、あとで更新するつもりです。

Happy Mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184892269
JJIglesias (2026-07-02 00:54:28+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
JJIglesias (2026-07-02 00:54:18+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
yelisey90 (2026-07-16 20:18:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1534163328 
barrier=lift_gate ?
Shrinks99 (2026-07-07 22:26:54+00:00): Are these pitches numbered / signed as "SKYDOME"?
bphennessy (2026-07-07 22:59:37+00:00): Yep! Skydome has an official parks department sign up that says "Welcome to SKYDOME in Trinity Bellwoods Park" and 2 and 3 are numbered on the fence behind home plate.
Wildsharky (2026-07-06 10:34:07+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185021896
Glassman (2026-07-01 16:25:12+00:00): Princeton Avenue is likely a highway=residential. Unclassified is basically the same thing, but typically found in rural areas. (We inherited highway classification from England where OSM got it's start)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184893621
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-29 05:47:00+00:00): DWG revert - fix incorrect tagging from undiscussed import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186563081
gc27 (2026-07-01 05:08:34+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Automated_edits 機械的編集についてOSMコミュニティの方針を確認してください
Senihtu (2026-07-02 06:21:28+00:00): Guten Morgen.
Schön, das Du bei OSM mitmachst!
Bitte sieh Dir diesen Änderungssatz noch einmal an.
Kann es sein, daß Dir da ein, zwei Punkte verrutscht sind? 
happy mapping
Senihtu
Camp Auenblick (2026-07-02 07:26:23+00:00): Hallo Senihtu,
vielen dank für den Hinweis.
Punkt1:
Camp Auenblick war schon als Punkt in der map. Leider ohne weitere Informationen. So habe ich eine neue Fläche erstellt. Kannst du den alten Punkt deaktivieren?
Punkt2:
Da ich das Camp direkt am Radweg habe, dachte ich das icheine Relation auf den Oder-Neiße Radweg setze. Ist das falsch?
VG 
Thomas