piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frank Peng (2026-02-06 05:08:24+00:00): You could have retagged the area tagged with just area=yes that you deleted in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481417747/history) to building=yes since it outlined a building in aerial imagery. Please don't delete existing map elements and redraw them anew. Instead, please just modify the existing map elements as it helps preserve the history on OSM.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178166541
masoudghorbani (2026-02-15 05:35:07+00:00): چرا اسم شعبه نداره ؟
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-15 11:33:25+00:00): Hi @masoudghorbany
We can't break the rules, don't put multiple tags in one tag. The edits you made to some of the tags for this business are not correct. The corrections were made in changesets 178167729 and 178576958. Don't continue this process, otherwise I will have to report you.
NeisBot (2026-02-06 05:58:47+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/218550754 v4 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1240668630 v1 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/2277902582 v5

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178167782
NeisReview (2026-02-15 05:33:33+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178455236
kuhni74 (2026-02-06 14:31:47+00:00): Vielen Dank! Hab es noch in keinem Luftbild sehen können? Manche tags waren nur auf den Eckpunkten (das war glaub ich nicht so gedacht?), habe sie auf die Fläche verschoben und dann noch das Teil in die Wald-Relation integriert (Rolle: inner).
vergissmiNET (2026-02-06 14:40:57+00:00): Ich war zufällig unlängst dort. Als Basis diente ein Foto und die gerodete Waldfläche im Luftbild von Mapbox Satellite. Danke für die korrekte Zuweisung der Tags!
kuhni74 (2026-02-06 14:52:48+00:00): Okay, danke! Also geometrisch ist es möglicherweise noch nicht ganz präzise? Falls nicht, sollte vielleicht noch ein "fixme" gesetzt werden?
kuhni74 (2026-02-06 15:00:35+00:00): und falls Du zufällig mal hier vorbeikommst? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4884809
vergissmiNET (2026-02-06 20:26:24+00:00): Hab ich ergänzt. Lutzmannsdorf komm ich auch regelmäßig vorbei, ist notiert.
kuhni74 (2026-02-06 21:24:23+00:00): merci!
NeisBot (2026-02-06 06:00:17+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1474457726 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "TS Suites"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-15 05:33:24+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178569219
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
bxl-forever (2026-02-06 12:10:18+00:00): Hello, Snare King.

Again, please apply common sense when editing areas.

Do NOT select random places in the world to start clicking on objects until you see a "tag upgrade" suggestion.  Many of those suggestions by the iD editor are plainly incorrect.

Here is an example for this Paris station:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3530939200/history

A mapper had provided the note to warn you: 
note=Please do not add the tag public_transport=station, it is already on the way that defines the footprint of the station

What did you do?  You clicked on the "suggestion" in iD and you added "public_station=station", which means that we have duplicate information on the Paris public transport map.

Again, we had to revert your change.
NeisBot (2026-02-06 06:00:20+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13527804527 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Suites building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-15 05:33:25+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178569220
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-02-06 06:00:21+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13527787899 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Accounting firm"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-15 05:33:27+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178569222
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
moonpenny (2026-03-20 15:22:23+00:00): Thanks for clarifying this for me!
TrickyFoxy (2026-03-14 07:54:53+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:42:05+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13527920102 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Beach Tennis complex"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-16 05:32:59+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178610716
(No visible changes after review)
TheNightRider (2026-02-06 07:07:29+00:00): Didn't just update the note, but deleted it and missed documenting that in the changeset comments.
eggie (2026-02-06 08:02:19+00:00): Beste pgert,

Het is niet duidelijk wat je hebt gedaan.
Het lijkt erop dat je wegen hebt gesplitts. met welk doel. Wanneer iets niet lang gaat duren laten we de qegen ongemoeid. Duurt het veel langer dan wordt is met conditional getagd. Bv
access:conditional=no @ (2025 Sep 20-2026 Apr 03)

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-06 08:05:08+00:00): Reverted by changeset #178173296

Je kunt evt een opmerking op de kaart zetten dan pakt een ervaren mapper het wel op. 
Hoelang gaat de afsluiting duren? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-06 08:07:41+00:00): Dit duurt te kort nog om de wegen af te sluiten.

M520711: Provincialeweg Noord Almkerk Kabels / Leidingen fase 1
Altena
19-01-2026 07:00 t/m 27-02-2026 16:00
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-08 02:33:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13528330595

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-08 04:53:05+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13528330595

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rarad74 (2026-02-06 09:48:27+00:00): Daca poti sa pui tag de asfalt in chiajna, verifica daca vrei si poti ce stradute laterale rezindentiale dintre cele fara tag de asfalt trebuie pus asfalt. Adica au fost asfaltate intre timp. Doar cele pe care ai fopst tu si stii sigur ca sunt asfaltate, dar pe openstreetmap apar ca fiind neasfaltate.
openstreetmapbuddy (2026-02-06 10:11:43+00:00): Măcar știu să aliniez străzi pe Go Map acum
YomanNH (2026-02-06 08:08:38+00:00): Dzięki za poprawki!
Jeszcze jedną rzecz zauważyłem - na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162215563 dodałeś source:maxspeed=PL:living_street, więc pewnie są tu znaki strefy zamieszkania. W takim razie dobrze byłoby takie drogi zmienić na highway=living_street :)
pandamahoniowa (2026-02-06 09:01:05+00:00): Poprawione tu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178175505
YomanNH (2026-02-06 09:08:26+00:00): Super, dzięki!
TrickyFoxy (2026-02-08 00:44:07+00:00): Во-первых, нельзя опираться на чужие карты.
Во-вторых, на панорамах видно, что там стоят знаки запрета проезда.

Это дорога, но движения по ней нет
TrickyFoxy (2026-02-08 00:47:26+00:00): Добавил запрет
Jakka (2026-02-06 10:15:43+00:00): Bedankt voor de verbetering.
Supaplex (2026-02-09 05:40:29+00:00): We block your account due to not adding changeset comment when upload, and mass deletion
For detail, please referer to: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19762
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178173758
Supaplex (2026-02-09 05:40:34+00:00): Мы заблокировали ваш аккаунт из-за отсутствия комментария к изменениям при загрузке и массового удаления.
Подробности см. по ссылке: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19762
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178173758
rarad74 (2026-02-06 10:02:23+00:00): Nu exista nicio curba acolo. Nu mai inventa de la tine.
rarad74 (2026-02-06 09:57:51+00:00): Cine ti-a zis ca nu exosta? Ai fost acolo in ultima vreme? Nu cred... Exista ca si alee pietonala.
openstreetmapbuddy (2026-02-06 10:11:00+00:00): Unde? Pe Titel Petrescu nu cred ca poti face stânga in bulevardul Ghencea.
rarad74 (2026-02-06 10:25:47+00:00): Langa Biblioteca NAtionala.

Nu mai eidta in mai multe puncte la asa mare distanta. Salveaza mai intai intr-un loc si apoi editezi si in alta parte.
openstreetmapbuddy (2026-02-06 14:56:24+00:00): Pot si masinile merge un pic pe estul Dambovitei, dublu-sens.
rarad74 (2026-02-06 09:50:50+00:00): Momentan alea care duc nicaieri din giratoriul ala nu or avea sens unic. Dar cand drumul acela de legatura care e in stadiu de proiect va fi gata , cele doua strazi vor avea sens unic. Asa ca este inutil sa scoti acum sensul unic.
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:39:13+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/835779061 v5 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7801133913 v2
https://osm.org/node/7801133914 v2
https://osm.org/node/7801133915 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178174584
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:39:16+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 17 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/835779027 v7 | 16 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7801133899 v3
https://osm.org/node/7801133900 v2
https://osm.org/node/7801133901 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178174819
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-08 04:53:09+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13528449292

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2026-02-06 10:10:46+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Accurately mapped. However, a few buildings were not squared.
Don't you use the Building Tool plugin?
Then any building you map is rectangular by default (or round).
jhingea (2026-02-07 10:41:45+00:00): Yes, I do. In this case the only modes used were Draw buildings (B) and Extrude (X), so the 'non-squaredness' is a bit strange.
By the way: As I mentioned at your previous comment to another task: When you communicate in this way with changeset comments, please mention the relevant taskID. Alternatively, use Task comments.
jhingea (2026-02-07 17:42:20+00:00): But I should have checked with the Marathoner tool…
Thanks for validating
NeisBot (2026-02-06 08:56:10+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (3 changesets) shows that 370 of your last 370 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23794837
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-08 04:53:23+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1116437137

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Branko Kokanovic (2026-02-07 09:30:05+00:00): Da menjam u Dini isto?
Branko Kokanovic (2026-02-07 09:32:33+00:00): Ostao ti https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10476957#map=12/44.6238/20.4541
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:42:13+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13526984128 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "samoobsługowe magazyny"
---
Na przykład bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "samoobsługowe magazyny"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-16 05:33:00+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178569213
berndw (2026-02-11 11:59:38+00:00): Hallo willkommen bei Opnstreetmap

Ich habe eine  Frage, bzw einen Hinweis zu dem Adresseintrag.

Das Erfassen einer Hausnummer per kaufmännischen Und, aka &, ist ungewöhnlich, besser wäre es, falls es zwei Eingänge gibt, diese als separate building=entrance an der Gebüdeumring  mit der jeweiligen Adresse zu erfassen und das Gebäude ohne Adresse zu lassen.

Ansonsten werden mehrere Adressen per Semikolon getrennt ohne Leerzeichen erfasst, also
addr:housenumber=60b;60c

Möchtest Du das ändern?
berndw (2026-02-11 12:01:28+00:00): Kleiner Fehler von mir ;-)

neuerdings nimmt man bei getrennten Eingängen entrance=yes anstelle von building=entrance
Kovoschiz (2026-02-07 11:02:03+00:00): 1. OSM `place=` + `name=`   is about common public use. Please don't upload personal-use data.
2. Please don't directly copy from wiki, AI, and Government only. They are incompatible copyright and ToS.
Tatfahren (2026-02-10 23:42:12+00:00): Zum fixme:
Als ich da gestern vorbei geschaut habe, war noch der Blumenladen drin und der Kleintransporter des Geschäfts stand davor. Ich hab aber nicht nachgefragt wann der  Umzug beendet ist.

Da muss man wohl ein wenig warten bis da jemand neues einzieht.
schobbish (2026-02-07 01:59:49+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM! In the future, please write more descriptive changeset comments as a courtesy to your fellow mappers. See this wiki for more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178177379
rempshaener (2026-02-06 19:29:51+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Laut Kommentar („wir sind eigentümer der Straße und diese ist nicht öffentlich“) scheint es darum zu gehen, dass die Straße nicht durch Fremde genutzt werden soll.
In den Daten von OSM war das auch bislang bereits sichergestellt: als privat gekennzeichnet war der Weg bereits. Die aktuellen Änderungen waren da eher kontraproduktiv: der nun eingebaute Fehler „privat“ statt „private“ führt dazu, dass Software den Weg nicht mehr als privat erkennt.
Ich habe die Änderungen daher zurückgenommen.
Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
Wanderer2000 (2026-02-06 10:18:47+00:00): Hoi ttwimlex,

Als een restaurant (of winkel of andere poi) gesloten is, graag de adresnode laten staan en alleen de tags van de poi verwijderen. Anders missen er opeens adressen op de kaart!

Ik heb de adresnodes uit je wijzigingen weer hersteld.

Happy mapping,
Wanderer
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-19 09:57:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/648737169/history

Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here.
y + enter to confirm, anything else to reject
Fran Alves (2026-02-19 16:37:41+00:00): It doesn't exist yet, but the plans are real. The foundation stone was laid in June 2025, and in January 2026 there was news about funding from the Spanish government.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-19 18:56:41+00:00): then I removed

building=proposed
construction_end_expected=2022
office=research

as office does not yet existing, building= is for existing buildings and it clearly will not be completed by the end of 2022

(I am dubious about mapping plans at all but I will not outright delete it for places I have not visited)
codywindrose (2026-03-29 19:33:41+00:00): #marshall-islands-2026
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:42:18+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/4310793317 v6

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Piojos tratamiento centro"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Centro de tratamiento para piojos"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-16 05:33:00+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178610718
(No visible changes after review)
simo_explorer (2026-02-16 14:30:18+00:00): Ciao MarioFinoria, riguardo questa modifica, hai rimosso giustamente due duplicati ma ti sei scordato di trascrivere le informazioni dei due nodi precedenti (meglio un'unione delle informazioni), puoi rimediare ?
simo_explorer (2026-02-17 15:56:00+00:00): risolto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178686397
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:42:20+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13528796269 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tomb of Chavez family"

#MapWithoutSpam
JonsVG (2026-02-10 23:45:27+00:00): Thanks for the advise.
Vinber-Pro (2026-02-07 09:10:11+00:00): bonjour et merci pour la contribution.

je la replace à l'intersection entre le chemin qui amène au batiment et le batiment, car j'imagine que c'est la que se trouve l'entrée. 

je poserai ici le résultat
Vinber-Pro (2026-02-07 09:35:21+00:00): voici la porte d'entrée accessible en fauteuil https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4704488051
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-08 04:53:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13528828205

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:42:21+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13528844166 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Design Build firm"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-16 05:33:01+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178219742