piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Muhmaker (2026-03-31 12:51:04+00:00): Hello Yuliya Bokhan,
I noticed your edit here and have a few questions about it because I don't see the need for the changes.
Why was it necessary to separate the footway from the service-road in the parking lot? Why was the type of pedestrian crossing changed to  crossing=zebra even though there are no zebra markings visible in aerial images?
Can you please explain in more detail what kind of geometry error you were trying to fix?
I want to learn more about possible mistakes in this specific site that triggered the QA-algorithms of your company.
Best regards,
Muhmaker
YuliyaBokhan (2026-04-02 10:01:49+00:00): Hello Muhmaker,

Thank you for pointing this out and for your review. After reviewing the edit again, I believe you are right to question these changes.

The separation of the pedestrian path from the service road was based on a quality control review indicating a possible geometric dragged problem. Regarding the crossing=zebra tag, I agree this was likely incorrect, as there are no clearly visible zebra markings in the imagery. It looks like trying to fix a possible geometry problem caused me to make guesses that aren't really backed up by the data.

I’ll fix the crossing to “unmarked” and I’ll add a tag crossing:island=yes. As for the pedestrian path near the parking area, it is possible to cross the parking lot by pedestrians, as I understand. Do you think it would be correct if I connect the pedestrian path to Pyrmonter Straße in a straight way?

I’m sorry for any trouble caused by my edits.

Best regards,
Yuliya
Muhmaker (2026-04-02 12:04:08+00:00): Hello Yuliya,

thank you for offering to correct the data. Your assumption that pedestrians can cross the parking lot is correct. In my opinion most of the pedestrians will use "the shortest route" across the parking lot to go to the bus- and train-stations. But your suggestion for a direct connection to the street would also be a viable option.

Best regards,
Muhmaker
YuliyaBokhan (2026-04-03 16:20:35+00:00): Hello Muhmaker,

Thank you for your thoughts on this matter.
I agree that pedestrians will likely take the shortest route across the parking lot, and at the same time, I understand your point about mapping only clearly defined paths.

I have applied the correction based on our discussion.
Please feel free to make any further adjustments in this area as you see fit.

Once again, I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience I may have caused and thank you for the constructive discussion. I will certainly keep this in mind when working on similar cases in the future.

Best regards,
Yuliya
mavl (2026-03-28 09:39:35+00:00): Здравствуйте. "Шиномонтаж" - это не название. Это тип объекта, который указан с помощью тегов.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия
NeisBot (2026-03-27 11:06:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13684473139 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Drogaria São Lucas"
---
Por exemplo, uma versão mais neutra e factual do seu texto poderia ser: "Drogaria São Lucas"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-04 16:33:08+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180862976
(Delete spam tags. First version)
OlasMapy (2026-03-27 12:52:05+00:00): Gehort Bromberg wirklich zu Dusseldorf?
Kamil Kalata (2026-03-27 13:22:05+00:00): I'm sorry for the impoliteness of the commenter above (he's been already told off), but your changeset indeed spans from Düsseldorf to Moscow, making it larger than the whole state Germany, which is problematic to other contributors. Please be careful next time and limit edits of this kind to single city.
cyclist789 (2026-03-29 17:15:28+00:00): I presume it is impossible to split the changeset in two once it has been uploaded?
Kamil Kalata (2026-03-29 17:33:56+00:00): Sadly, no. Once a changeset is closed, it cannot be modified. The best countermeasure would be for editors to prevent or automatically split such large changesets.
There is a proof of concept in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/NorthCrab/diary/404701, but it requires API and maybe even database schema changes, therefore it wouldn't be possible to implement it in the main(stream) OSM site.
cyclist789 (2026-03-30 07:57:25+00:00): Hmm... The iD-editor always uploads changesets in one go, so making that particular editor split them should be easy enough. For editors that upload changes without immediately closing the changeset, however, that likely wouldn't be possible.

Actually, is there a system for displaying the changes of a changeset *on the map*? That would make it easier to see if anything relevant to one's field of interest has been affected.
iandees (2026-03-27 14:56:01+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4545334029 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180506932, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Warin61 (2026-03-28 00:24:12+00:00): I'll wait till your done!

These ways added immediately adjacent to tree relation 16051399 should be incorporated into it... 
The relation 16051399 is now not being rendered as it is broken by these edits. Tis results in a large tree area as a blank space on the map.
Warin61 (2026-03-28 03:53:06+00:00): I have separated the relation into 2 relations - one has the area you are making changes in .. the other covers a larger area so at least that will render while the other is sacrificial. 

Better mapping?
It would be good if you could add one single way from north to south rather than these small areas. That would then enable the relation to use it as a replacement for the sections involving both residential areas and the Brisbane Waters NP...
Warin61 (2026-03-28 03:59:55+00:00): Relation 7898026 - residential is in error!
See the blue line in https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.32559&lat=-33.43893&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

As there are no 'holes' in the areas a relation is not needed. 
Make each way a closed way - not separate segments but an area. Then delete the relation and tag each closed way with 'landuse=residential'.
user_23564325 (2026-03-28 05:56:22+00:00): That does make sense. sorry for making abit of a mess with the residential sections. My goal is to clean up the natural wood area around the NP, so it is more acurate.
majekw (2026-04-02 13:53:47+00:00): Czy ta droga do kładki jest obecnie nieprzejezdna? Bo oznaczenie 'construction' robi ją taką dla routerów.
voltairovicz (2026-04-03 21:31:02+00:00): Oficjalnie rozpoczęła się budowa ścieżki. Na zdjęciach, które wstawił profil gminy Oborniki Śląskie widać, że droga jest nieprzejezdna i rozryta. https://www.facebook.com/gminaobornikislaskie/posts/pfbid0c1rKuRsM3fAXQRRmCTrQ1jzrfsptNiTtcvF8PUB5EYmNwj8HDUpTQ6NehgRWrN6Sl      Nie chciałbym jeździć po czymś takim, zresztą wczoraj jechałem rowerem na wrocław i od strony kopalni było widać sprzęty i znaki drogowe, także lepiej żeby routingi nie pchały teraz ludzi w teren budowy. Zresztą nawet przed starem droga przed kładką była tragiczna, błota które omijałem pieszo przez zarośla i przebiłem sobie dętkę. Poczekajmy przynajmniej do stanu przejezdności jak nie otwarcia. Będę monitorał postęp robót
SpinOff (2026-03-27 11:56:45+00:00): Hej. Jesli hotel jest dopiero w budowie, to nie powinien być jeszcze zmapowany. Druga sprawa to użycie tagu name - w OSM powinien on być używany tylko do nazwy obiektu, a nie jego opisu. Tutaj znajdziesz więcej informacji: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy#Nazwa_jest_tylko_nazw%C4%85
NeisBot (2026-03-27 11:42:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13684548135 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mechanic workshop"
---
Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего текста могла бы быть: "Мастерская механика"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-04 16:33:11+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180499249
SekeRob repair (2026-03-28 13:15:01+00:00): Hi,

don't know why you change the golf_course tags on March 22 to building + layer=2 but I've reversed it back to leisure=golf_course.

I've added some greens, pins, bunkers while there using the tennis courts and large building to align the imagery.

happy mapping
SekeRob
SekeRob repair (2026-03-28 13:26:23+00:00): Tp add, I've removed the golf_course tags and changed them for all 18 to golf=fairway.  But for more greens/pins/bunkers the map no looks reasonable, green fringes, cart paths and other details can be added too.

cheers
Shamazu (2026-03-29 14:43:05+00:00): Cześć, wszystkie kierunki rowów były zaznaczone poprawnie. Poglądowo wg. projektu: https://mapwarper.net/layers/1822
felipeeugenio (2026-03-27 19:30:44+00:00): Hola. por favor estar conciente que un =path no permite que pasen vehículos de 4 ruedas.
De poder pasar dichos vehículos, por favor usar =track.

gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180498641
bxl-forever (2026-03-27 17:03:39+00:00): Hello, Trelly672.

Thanks for adding more places to OSM.
However, we require that you please abstain from typing address on POI; by doing so you are creating *extra* addresses to the map.
This is the second time we observe you typing a monolingual-French address whereas Brussels is a bilingual territory.
We are ready to believe that it’s *just* a new user’s mistake.  But please don’t do it again.
Thanks.
Trelly672 (2026-03-27 17:17:39+00:00): Hello hello,

Then should I just put in the name of the place after using the pointer to indicate the location?
That way no double adress and no issue regarding the language used.

And in case I still do need to type some adress, you talk about Brussels being bilingual but I guess it could be argued it's trilingual with the amount of English speakers and indications in English throughout the city, so should I put in french, dutch and english?

Simply trying to get the hang of contributing to OSM, so lmk!
bxl-forever (2026-03-27 17:43:47+00:00): All the addresses are already on the map and should not be repeated on new places.
We fixed your edit.
MassCartog (2026-03-29 14:41:20+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. Please don't remove features that exist on the ground, even if private. Instead, use the tagging system.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property
iandees (2026-03-27 14:56:19+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/270768745 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180506948, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
bxl-forever (2026-03-27 17:59:51+00:00): Hello, googlenaut.

This faulty MapRoulette edit damaged buildings again.

There are countless false positives in MapRoulette, please pay attention to what you are doing and please stop trying to map as fast as possible to win more points in MapRoulette.  The purpose is to build a correct map of the world, not to please some validator.  And if the validator points at errors, one should take the time to really understand what is the error; if a road intersects the building, sometimes the building is badly traced… but at other times the building is correct and the road is wrong.

For instance, this building you changed had a correct geometry, with a 100% match of government data, and the geometry source was documented in the tags.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1450386480/history/2

You remapped it to a random shape, vaguely based on what the (distorted) aerial imagery looks like.

I will try to revert some of your latest edits in Belgium to restore the correct geometry
eggie (2026-03-27 13:38:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
nevw (2026-03-27 12:44:02+00:00): Hi, if your business does not occupy all the floors of the building you should add a new node inside the building shape and add your business tags to that instead of adding them to the building.
RES Business IT (2026-03-27 13:28:49+00:00): Sure, will update this.
nevw (2026-03-27 23:18:42+00:00): I updated this area. Can you check thanks. I deleted addr: state,postcode,suburb from the business tags as these are optional and already mapped by area in Aust. You can re-add if preferred.
openmapper_11 (2026-04-01 13:36:47+00:00): Hi, this road has been demolished in 2024. The Mapbox  is the up-to-date image.
openmapper_11 (2026-04-01 13:40:22+00:00): Demolished in August 2025*.
Maksim Sazanovich (2026-04-02 09:04:20+00:00): Hello openmapper_11. Thanks for your feedback and fixing my edit - it's much appreciated.
Best regards, Maksim.
NeisBot (2026-03-27 12:33:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12288768322 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Comunicação escritório"
---
Por exemplo, uma versão mais neutra e factual do seu texto poderia ser: "Comunicação escritório"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-04 16:33:14+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180862980
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
daganzdaanda (2026-03-28 23:03:17+00:00): Adressen revertiert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180503047 
Siehe auch Kommentar bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180531824
Michael Collins (2026-04-10 04:36:06+00:00): Non of these objects appear to be buildings in Esri World Imagery.
daganzdaanda (2026-03-28 23:02:33+00:00): Adressen revertiert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180503047 
Siehe auch Kommentar bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180531824
NeisBot (2026-03-27 12:54:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13684684779 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Training Center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-04 16:33:17+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/180641671
silversurfer83 (2026-03-28 17:35:19+00:00): Hi :)

dann wäre es besser gewesen, die Fläche einfach in landuse=construction zu ändern ohne sie zu löschen. 

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180501304
iandees (2026-03-27 14:56:36+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/100714676 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180506955, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
eggie (2026-03-27 13:48:09+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. 
Hier heb ik het adres toch weer aangepast, anders is het niet vindbaar.
De aanwijzing Molenstraat heb ik onder description gezet. 
Het adres heb ik van het voetpad gehaald. De ingang zat aan een stedelijk winkelgebied Binnenstad vast. Daar hoorde die niet. 
'k Denk niet dat een ingang nodig is. 

MVG
eggie
ScheefWiel (2026-03-27 15:21:20+00:00): Beste Eggie,

Bedankt voor uw snelle reactie.
Ah, helder. Dank voor de toelichting en de aanpassingen.

Ik wens u alvast een prettig weekend.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Laura - 't Scheef Wiel Fietsen V.O.F.
5m4u9 (2026-03-28 13:59:30+00:00): Hola, bienvenido y gracias por mejorar el mapa en Bolivia!

Es genial que hayas mejorado los nombres de las calles en villazón... no existe algo accesible (mapa) público en internet para revisar :(. Algunas calles me basé en lo publicado en el sicoes.

En esta o en otra edición cambiaste "la importancia" de algunas vías en el sureste de villazón (zona cárcel)... hay alguna razón?

pensé que porque está próxima la plaza principal tenía alguna importancia unir la final circunvalación a través de la final eduardo avaroa y a la altura de la maria luisa cabrera... 

sería genial si puedes añadir (con punto) los barrios. solo encontré referencia de algunos barrios en su PTDI pero no su ubicación :(...
Omar Tintilay (2026-03-29 04:46:44+00:00): el cambio lo hice por que son calles urbanas normales, de hecho no son tan concurridas.

la via mas usada que conecta a la circunvalacion es la Av. Antofagasta, esta avenida es como la columna vertebral de la ciudad

la final circunvalacion por el sur este, de momento es de tierra y muy poco usada.

si me dejas tu correo puedo compartirte el plano de catastro
5m4u9 (2026-03-29 16:46:04+00:00): Gracias por responder y aclarar. 

Puedes subirlo aquí? -> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1ZmzIIIR1E1jkvWiHzUoykpwB8eOuL7fP?usp=sharing (tienes los permisos necesarios)

Si vos estas corrigiendo está bien, cuando tenga más tiempo veo el catrastro...

Tengo una duda respecto a la Av. Cornelio Saavedra (la paralela izq a la Argentina) no es doble sentido? 

En el PTDI Villazón 2021 menciona la ruta para camiones, no tiene mapa y solo describe "calles" pero llegando a este sector no dice mucho.... 

mi dura es si un camión pesado que pasa el puente hacia el norte por dónde circula para llegar hasta la Maria Luisa Cabrera? 🤔 pensé que iba por la argentina y giraba a la izq y de regreso por la cornerio saavedra... pero la argentina es muy angosta y me parecía que la cornelio saavedra "parece más ancha" y como es avenida puede que sea doble sentido....

la ruta de transporte pesado, es: rotonda ingreso villazón -> circunvalación oeste -> antonio quijarro -> via colectora -> ayacucho -> tomas frias -> panamericana -> pagador -> bolívar -> maria luisa cabrera...
Omar Tintilay (2026-03-29 17:58:20+00:00): tienes razon, no puse ese detalle.
al ingresar por el puente, toman la Cornelio Saavedra hasta el Pasaje Coronel arraya. Luego suben a la Av. Jm Deheza hasta la Maria Luisa Cabrera y desde ahi la ruta del trasporte pesado como indicas....
iandees (2026-03-27 14:56:44+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3827575228 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180506959, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
John Kastner (2026-03-28 14:58:43+00:00): highway=construction might be appropriate depending on exactly what condition it's in
NeisBot (2026-03-27 13:21:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13634009018 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Trailer dealership"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-27 17:33:33+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-05 07:28:32+00:00): Reverted series of changesets adding SEO POI and blatantly promotional description=* and other malformed tags to it

https://osm.org/changeset/185126364
apm-wa (2026-05-19 15:38:26+00:00): Street signs in Turkmenistan are NOT in English.
eggie (2026-03-27 16:09:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-03-27 13:49:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
daganzdaanda (2026-03-28 22:12:22+00:00): Adressen revertiert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180561210, Siehe auch Kommentar bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180531824
iandees (2026-03-27 14:56:48+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5261336821 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180506967, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!