piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MxxCon (2025-03-05 02:55:07+00:00): Of what I see on satellite imagery, only stuff around "Gantry Crane Track" (Description of a feature shouldn't be its name.).
Lidar imagery doesn't indicate that it's a leftover of railway tracks.
Also, a paved parking lot shouldn't be mapped as historic=ruins.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163224737
Ktr101 (2025-03-05 03:00:27+00:00): Then what do you think the long embankments and cuts into the sand are, as they are located right where maps and aerial imagery has shown the railroad to have been.

It would be nice if there was a crane railroad criteria, but such is life. As for the ruins bit, mapping it as a former military area makes it show up on the map, so I was trying to go with the best option that I could think of. If you can suggest a better option, please do.
Mashin (2025-03-05 08:50:31+00:00): Hi Ktr101, I agree with all the complaints here. Parking lot is not a historic ruin, crane is not a railway, embarkments and cuttings are also not a railway. 
IMO the solution should be to revert this changeset and the features that are still present should be then mapped correctly.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dembankment

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aman_made%3Dcutting

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcrane
Ktr101 (2025-03-06 01:22:41+00:00): So going off of this, how would we categorize the crane route, seeing as I have seen this copied at major shipping ports (albeit, with an actual crane). I am not sure if MxxCon asked for your opinion on this, so that is why I am asking again (I do not want to usurp anyone's recommendation), because I would be curious how you would recommend mapping the proving ground. Yes, I agree that a marking lot is not a historic site, however it does also exist in the area that used to be the ground.

Also, for the railroad, I can certainly cut up what is there and can mark embankments and whatnot, but I want to ensure some consistency, especially because there are many other cuts that I did not map, because I did not want to spend all night on it.
Mashin (2025-03-06 22:01:03+00:00): Easiest way to map the crane seems to be to draw a single area encompassing all the rail for moving and tagging:
abandoned:man_made=crane
crane:type=gantry_crane
crane:mobile=rail

For the proving grounds, I would only draw area around actual visible remains of objects. And tag perhaps with historic=military.

It's fine if you don't have time for micro-mapping of cuttings and embarkments, but there should not be ways tagged as abandoned railway. The railway is simply not there any more.
Ktr101 (2025-03-11 02:09:42+00:00): I have received your message and will look into this later in the week, but I just wanted to let you know since it may be a few days until I get to it.
Gregory Peony (2025-03-05 14:29:11+00:00): You correctly moved most of the existing footprints to align them.--- Some features I've flagged are footprints where you first deleted an existing footprint before adding a new one in their place. It can be more difficult to edit the existing data but it helps to preserve the meta data of the features. Delete features when you think that those features are invalid and do not represent features which are there in reality; not to delete and redraw them.--- There are a few places where you inaccurately glued nodes: hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing nodes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163224816
woodpeck (2025-03-05 16:43:28+00:00): Dear user celicni,

you are adding a large number of name:sr tags to places in Turkey, even to the smallest of villages which until that time had only Turkish and at best a secondary Kurdish name.

As you know, we do not add transliterations as name:xx tags - a name added in this way has to be a name in its own right, not just the product of some automatism.

You need credible sources for these additions or else they will have to be reverted. 

What is, for example, your source for name:sr=name:sr Богруделик on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2311601715?

Your edits are also made using a software that advertises itself as "java agent v2". As you know, automated/mechanical edits to OpenStreetMap have to be discussed before they can go ahead. Could you point us to the place where this has been discussed with the Turkish community?

Best     
Frederik Ramm     
OSMF Data Working Group     
Ticket#2025030510000545
celicni (2025-03-06 00:53:00+00:00): @woodpeck

Hi Frederik,

First of all, I am going to desist from further changes regarding Turkish places until there's an agreement whether it is OK to proceed.

To elaborate regarding "java agent v2". Contents of all these changes is prepared manually (as in not programatically and certainly not AI), and upload is done through a simple java tool I prepared just to avoid repetitive work. I probably should've named the user agent better, and I'll do that.

Regarding the meritum of these changes, I understand why they may seem odd, however due to phonetic traits of Serbian language these changes actually do bring real value to Serbian speaking map users. For instance, Serbian speaker not familiar with Turkish language won't have any good idea how to read name "Hacımuslu", but "Хаџимуслу" helps anyone to read and pronounce it correctly.

Main motivation for these edits is to be utilised for localized map display in Serbian Wikipedia. Here's an example:

https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A7%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BB%D1%83

Regarding the source, I used official rules for transcribing of Turkish names to Serbian, published in Serbian Ortography. As I mentioned, transcription is a major feature of Serbian language and there are pretty detailed rules for various languages. Source for the relevant section is available here:

https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0:%D0%A2%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BF%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0_%D1%81%D0%B0_%D1%82%D1%83%D1%80%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B3_%D1%98%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0

I made these changes in good faith and assuming that they don't harm anyone as localized names are displayed only to users that explicitly turn them on (and choose Serbian language). I accept the complaint that I should've discussed with Turkish community. I will open a discussion on Turkish channel.

Thanks,
Goran Obradovic
Pan (2025-03-06 04:18:47+00:00): Many of these are actally needle leaves.
Kovoschiz (2025-03-12 08:18:53+00:00): Please don't make literal transliterations. This is not even what the mountain is called. `name=` is a proper name commonly used only. Machine-like translations are not needed.
Jade Jossen (2025-03-12 16:14:14+00:00): Hello, I appreciate the help. It is very difficult to find actual translations for these POI because they are so small, and there isn't a clear translation on Google. If you have a better translation, please change it. But having something in Roman characters would be useful to folks who do not read Chinese.
Ktr101 (2025-03-05 02:33:49+00:00): Much of this is visible on LIDAR. It may have been mapped a bit too much, but the rock cuts are still there to the North of the highway.
MxxCon (2025-03-05 02:36:53+00:00): OSM is a map of the world NOW, not how it was at an indeterminate point in the past. None of the features you mapped are visible on any available satellite imagery. Imaginary features don't belong on OSM.
habi (2025-03-26 08:14:10+00:00): Ciao rbircher
Du hast hier dem Perron 2 `waterway=yes` hinzugefügt, was dazu führte, dass das Perron als "Fehler" bei https://waterwaymap.org/loops/#map=7.09/47.061/7.697 auftauchte.
Ich habe diese Schlüssel-Wert-Kombination wieder entfernt.
Gruss,
habi
rbircher (2025-03-29 10:37:19+00:00): Ups, da hab ich eine Bahnhof geflutet ;-) Wahr vermutlich an dem Tag so nass, dass ich dachte Watherway wäre passend.

Spass bei Seite, sollte natürlich Wheelchair=yes heissen ;-)

Gruss Raphael
habi (2025-03-29 20:46:21+00:00): ♿︎=yes macht auch mehr Sinn als 🌊=yes :)
Mersi fürs nachekorrigieren, happy mapping!
b-jazz (2025-03-09 19:22:16+00:00): Hey there Nat,
Thanks for helping out with my golf cleanup maproulette challenge. One thing to note is that the green and fairway shouldn't share nodes when the fairway fully surrounds the green. There should be a fringe that is left so that there is a gap all the way around the green. Of course, if the fairway doesn't surround the green, but instead butts up against it, then yes, by all means share the nodes between the two objects. Thanks again!
TheNatBoi (2025-03-12 23:58:32+00:00): Ah I see. I must have decided to switch styles halfway through. I'll fix that. Thanks!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 00:28:57+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165049947
aharvey (2025-03-05 23:46:38+00:00): I tweaked a few tags https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1364663766

In particular access=yes since it's open for all, but also added fee:conditional for conditions for free parking.

Also added https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:park%20ride
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Chaitanya Kumar CH (2025-03-06 09:58:01+00:00): The footprint deleted in this changeset was prepared based on the ground position of the building. Different parts of the building were specified with appropriate height and roof information. They were removed as well. The new footprint was drawn based on how the roof appears on the satellite image, from an angle. A lot of correct attribute information was added. But it could have been added to the earlier polygon.
Support FMC Corsicana (2025-03-07 06:19:19+00:00): Hey Chaitanya, feel free to revert the alterations if need be. I was unable to update information with our connecting the entire structure, as everything was broken in different sections, and info was not linking correctly.
Chaitanya Kumar CH (2025-03-07 06:24:20+00:00): I will see if I can revert the changes and add the details you added.
AngocA (2025-03-06 02:53:28+00:00): Hola JLOSM

Te quería pedir el favor que revises de vez en cuando los nombres de cuerpos de agua, ya que algunas veces están quedando mal escritos, principalmente la palabra Quebrada. O Acequía con tilde.

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1ZQf
JLOSM (2025-03-10 00:25:33+00:00): Muchas palabras en las Hojas en IGAC.   Como por ejemplo palabras graves que terminan en vocal. Trato de irlas corrigiendo antes de guardar cambio, pero quizás en algunos ediciones, se me hallan quedado sin corregir.
Kovoschiz (2025-03-05 07:55:01+00:00): The slip lanes are split at exactly the tip of the hatched area to follow the physical separation rule as much as possible. The geometry is indicated by `placement=transition`
Kovoschiz (2025-03-05 08:00:14+00:00): 2. It's not necessary to draw curves following the vehicle driving track / swept path. You can think of how it works at intersections, where the round street corner radius isn't represented directly.  So the lane doesn't need to be followed according to the marked line, and the inner side. Drawing straight according to the outer side is the best from experience. This is specially the case for such roundabouts that would leave extremely short segments from an entry to the next exit.
radiotrefoil (2025-03-26 01:03:59+00:00): Hi, I understand that there isn't an official dedicated road reserve for Waterfall Road. However OSM records the "ground truth" and a survey found that the Waterfall Road sign is still in place. Also, given that some houses are still addressed as such, I think it would be appropriate to reinstate the name Waterfall Road for way/55547043.
nevw (2025-04-14 07:56:56+00:00): I have reinstated Waterfall Road in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164924947#map=14/-33.70837/150.41792
dypa (2025-03-21 18:12:58+00:00): При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra

Пожалуйста при внесении следующих правок используйте теги (Размеченный (нерегулируемый) пешеходный переход)
crossing=uncontrolled
crossing:markings=zebra

Заранее спасибо!
Chaitanya Kumar CH (2025-03-06 10:01:21+00:00): Parking aisles are joined with the West 3rd Avenue. They should be joined properly.
Support FMC Corsicana (2025-03-07 06:15:30+00:00): Hey Chaitanya, could you please elaborate on how to connect this street parking correctly so it may appear on the map correctly.
b-jazz (2025-03-08 19:49:00+00:00): Thanks for helping with my golf course cleanup project!
NeisRevert (2025-03-05 12:53:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163243856 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove test data
Jerry Ling (2025-03-05 05:07:12+00:00): https://www.huhousing.harvard.edu/our-properties/peabody-terrace
Jerry Ling (2025-03-05 05:13:15+00:00): https://www.huhousing.harvard.edu/our-properties/peabody-terrace
NeisRevert (2025-03-05 12:53:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163243876 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove test data
NeisBot (2025-03-05 06:00:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-03-05 06:48:40+00:00): 👍

Thank you for updating the mentioned element and its description in changeset https://osm.org/changeset/163229302
NeisBot (2025-03-05 06:24:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-03-14 15:34:25+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163274446
Glassman (2025-03-08 00:56:40+00:00): A couple of questions. You tagged a house on E. Mill Plain Blvd as a place of worship. It looks more like a plain house. Is it really a place of worship, or maybe the pastors house?

Also you tagged two house as tourism=apartment. I think a better way is to tag it as building=apartments. There building just for tourism so it you may be correct. We just don't see that many. 

Can you review this edits? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163229741
BCNorwich (2025-03-05 08:28:00+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Features added to OSM must be on the ground truth verifiable to everyone. Thus I've reverted those two fictional names.

Regarding  MacEmergency Apple Repair Store London, this business would not be on the pavement here. I can not find evidence of a physical business here that folk can visit. If it is an online only operation as it's website suggests then it should not be in the OSM database. Thus I've removed it. 

Regards Bernard.
SuperPhat (2025-03-05 09:51:29+00:00): 1) Ignore Sweet FA Computers please.

2) Apple Mac Repairs London (Refurbished Mac Shop) can be found here: https://g.co/kgs/FC1CbZR and here: https://www.bing.com/maps?&ty=18&ss=ypid.YN1029x16986357988605005901&mb=51.586113~-0.1135~51.581613~-0.109059&description=81%20Tottenham%20Lane%2C%20London%20N8%209BE%C2%B7IT%20service%20%26%20computer%20repair&dt=1741168800000&tt=Apple%20Mac%20Repairs%20London%20-%20Refurbished%20Mac%20Store&tsts0=%2526ty%253D18%2526ss%253Dypid.YN1029x16986357988605005901%2526mb%253D51.586113~-0.1135~51.581613~-0.109059%2526description%253D81%252520Tottenham%252520Lane%25252C%252520London%252520N8%2525209BE%2525C2%2525B7IT%252520service%252520%252526%252520computer%252520repair%2526dt%253D1741168800000&tstt0=Apple%20Mac%20Repairs%20London%20-%20Refurbished%20Mac%20Store&cp=51.583863~-0.120978&lvl=17&pi=0&ftst=0&ftics=False&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027

3) MacEmergency Apple Repair Store London can be found here: https://www.bing.com/search?q=macemergency+n8&qs=n&form=EX0050&sp=-1&lq=0&pq=macemergency+n8&sc=9-15&sk=&cvid=47EB276530A047389C86AA929E3AFE75&ghsh=0&ghacc=0&ghpl=&filters=local_ypid:"YN1029x6219981016518081895"&shtp=GetUrl&shid=4716ba04-a21d-4467-ac15-3c461f2cdc06&shtk=TWFjRW1lcmdlbmN5IEFwcGxlIE1hYyBSZXBhaXJzIExvbmRvbg%3D%3D&shdk=TWFjRW1lcmdlbmN5IEFwcGxlIE1hYyBSZXBhaXJzIExvbmRvbsK2wrZNYWNFbWVyZ2VuY3kgaXMgdGhlIE11bHRpIEF3YXJkIFdpbm5pbmcgZGVzdGluYXRpb24gZm9yIOKApg%3D%3D&shhk=7i1aDpD%2B8Uang3Hdbt9Iv5GnANYt3fkna7W43pj8S1w%3D and also here https://g.co/kgs/fMiM4Yb

Thanks
vertraut (2025-03-05 07:16:46+00:00): All points and form are correct. Accuracy like in registration documents.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-04 01:21:02+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality mapping from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167156814
wireguy (2025-03-05 11:38:05+00:00): Tom, welcome to OSM.  good change on removing personal data   The outline of the house needed some work.  I made it just the house, and pressed the Q key to square the corners.  I also added some sidewalk, the address info, and some pools.   Lots more to do,  keep mapping!  see changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163241015
Glassman (2025-03-05 17:16:16+00:00): Why did you remove building that are still shown on imagery?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163231539
Daska111 (2025-03-05 07:39:53+00:00): Добавлен*
Glassman (2025-03-05 17:16:58+00:00): That does not look like a meadow?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163231910
rempshaener (2025-03-05 18:48:14+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.

Zur Feuerwache:
- Wenn möglich, bietet es sich bei Feuerwachen immer an, die Daten nicht nur auf einem Punkt („node“), sondern auf dem Gelände („way“) zu erfassen.
- Der operator ist streng genommen die Gemeinde Niederkrüchten
- Wenn bekannt, könnte noch eine kurze „ref“ ergänzt werden, also in der Richtung LE/LG/LZ xyz. das wird dann auch in der OpenFireMap angezeigt.

Zum Hydranten:
Nur das „couplings“ ist überflüssig; couplings ist im Sinne von „Schlauchkupplung“ (also bei uns Storz A/B) gemeint, ist also insbesondere bei Überflurhydranten relevant.

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
moerko (2025-03-05 19:09:35+00:00): Super, danke für die Rückmeldung! Werde ich bei folgenden Beiträgen berücksichtigen!
Rouyki (2025-03-06 16:18:30+00:00): Robot？Why was it deleted even thoughin Chinese?Source？
Rouyki (2025-03-06 16:17:02+00:00): Robot？Why was it deleted even thoughin Chinese?
Emma Js (2025-03-14 08:25:08+00:00): Hello. I'm not a robot. I googled the name and it turned out to be an illegal organization. Not sure whether it should be mapped at all
Rouyki (2025-03-18 18:55:28+00:00): I see. It is called "诈骗园区" in Chinese, and in English, it might be referred to as a "Scam Factory/Center." If you google "China & Myawaddy," you can find relevant information. In fact, along the banks of the Moei River in Myawaddy, such parks are widespread (marked with Chinese names), and these markings have existed for a long time.
Taksine (2025-05-16 06:14:44+00:00): OSM will not tag whether its internal affairs are legal or not, and tagging these illegal organizations will help the police fight crime. On Google Maps, these places are deliberately tampered with by some people (for example, tag as a certain school dormitory). So we need to have a map that accurately depicts their criminal activities, otherwise we will be misled.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-05-16 07:43:44+00:00): 您好，Emma JS，对这片地区的称呼，在若干新闻报道中都用了“KK园区/KK Park”的称呼，且可以明确发现此地是以华人犯罪集团为主，因此依照osm中对于name的“common used”的原则，选取“KK园区”是更合理的，当然“KK Park”也是可以接受的。这和这片实体存在暴力和诈骗犯罪是无关的，name的值的选取是依靠“最常用”的原则来的。osm中按照“on the ground”的原则，若确实是存在的，那么就是可以记录的。当然绘制这个园区可能和缅甸的法律相违背，因此如果他作为缅甸人有顾虑，可以不进行编辑。

-----

Hello, Emma JS, in several news reports, this area has been referred to as "KK园区/KK Park," and it is evident that the location is primarily associated with Chinese criminal groups. Based on the principle of "commonly used" in OSM for the name tag, selecting "KK园区" seems more appropriate, though "KK Park" is also acceptable. This choice is unrelated to the violent and fraudulent crimes associated with the area; the selection of the name value adheres only strictly to the principle of "most commonly used."

In OSM, according to the "on the ground" principle, if this entity indeed exists, it is eligible to be recorded. However, mapping this area may conflict with Myanmar's laws, so if the person editing is a Myanmar national and has concerns, they can choose not to edit it.
NeisReview (2025-03-05 07:57:00+00:00): #DuplicateMapping

Hi, welcome to OSM.

You and some others created several duplicate elements in this area. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
NeisRevert (2025-03-14 07:19:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163598235 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove testdata
NeisReview (2025-03-05 07:57:16+00:00): #DuplicateMapping

Hi, welcome to OSM.

You and some others created several duplicate elements in this area. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
NeisRevert (2025-03-14 07:20:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163598269 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove testdata
LuckyNumberS7evin (2025-03-05 07:59:15+00:00): #DuplicateMapping

Hi, welcome to OSM.

You and some others created several duplicate elements in this area. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
seewäldler (2025-03-05 13:10:51+00:00): Hallo rene78
Umbenannt wohl nicht, ich glaube nicht mal, dass es einen offiziellen Namen dafür gibt. Auf den Bronzeschildern steht glaub ich keiner drauf. Ich weiss nur noch, dass als er gebaut wurde immer vom Rumpf-Brunnen gesprochen wurde. Und zur Einweihung oder sogar Namensgebung war der Bildhauer glaube ich auch da?
rene78 (2025-03-06 07:39:54+00:00): Hi Seewäldler,

okay, da lassen wir es so. Gibt jedoch wesentlich mehr Funde bei Google für "Buchhornbrunnen".

Ciao
Rene
seewäldler (2025-03-06 17:30:37+00:00): Hallo rene78 
Jetzt hab ich auch mal ein bischen rumgesucht. Die meisten Bilder die ich auf wikimedia gefunden habe und die von Buchhornbrunnen sprechen scheinen von nicht-Häflern zu sein, was auch immer das heissen mag. Von der Stadt hab ich eine recht aktuelle Liste der Brunnen entdeckt ( https://friedrichshafen-sitzungsdienst.komm.one/bi/getfile.asp?id=227570&type=do ) die von Rumpfbrunnen spricht. Also wird irgend eine Kombination aus name und alt_name (wohl eher passend als old_name)  schon richtig sein ;-) Nach der Liste fehlen dann noch der Brunnen im Charlottenhof, Ailingen Tobelesch und am Gondelhafen...
rene78 (2025-03-08 17:36:29+00:00): Interessant. Danke! Hab es mal in 'alt_name' abgeändert.