piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MxxCon (2024-03-28 22:45:53+00:00): Crosswalks should always be connected to the intersecting streets.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149153475
I-Izzo (2024-07-16 17:30:53+00:00): Thank you for informing me, when I was originally told not to, but that changed when I believe you or someone else in the area informed my supervisor that crosswalks should be connected.
neuhausr (2024-03-26 17:22:34+00:00): Hi, I see you simplified the Casey Creek way. In my opinion it didn't seem especially over-noded before and now looks kind of angular and ugly. But regardless, the result is a number of self-intersections in the updated way. Can you take a look and fix this? Thanks. OSM Inspector link: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-90.93707&lat=45.83840&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.86&overlays=long_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way%2Clong_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way
lastcommodore (2024-03-28 01:26:32+00:00): Sorry about that. I got into the habit of simplifying all water bodies around here because 90% of them are over-noded... I may have gone overboard on the simplification aggressiveness. I'll turn it down for future bodies, and re-simplify this one.

I'll comment again when I manage to get around to it. Thanks for your input.
lastcommodore (2024-04-05 18:57:11+00:00): I have undone the changeset and resimplified the creek with a lot less aggressive simplification.
Thanks for the feedback
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-26 00:02:03+00:00): Don't add descriptive names to features. Only official names should be added. You can read more here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

I went ahead and removed the names for you here.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149153636
DSMmainline (2024-03-26 19:17:05+00:00): Ok. Thank you for letting me know and it makes sense. I only used Google maps for a small portion, the rest I gathered while running the area from within a couple miles of my house. Is there a time amount I need to wait to resubmit the rest in a new batch? I use Wandrer.earth which uses the data for paths and roads.
Thanks.
tekim (2024-03-26 19:59:59+00:00): Thanks for the reply.  You are free to edit OSM at any time as long as you are only using acceptable sources, which includes your own first hand observation.
Allison P (2024-03-26 02:41:52+00:00): Please stop gluing landuse to roads. It is incorrect and makes it harder to maintain.
user_21303518 (2024-04-18 01:22:32+00:00): Várias edições iguais ?
anti-romantic (2024-03-30 12:33:08+00:00): Добрый день! А подскажите, в чем смысл этой правки? Несколько одинаковых пакетов правок, линии без тегов, еще и без комментариев
Frédéric Brière (2024-03-26 02:35:08+00:00): Good catch!  Thanks!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-26 02:59:55+00:00): Source:
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issues/open?item=1210&level=1&source=&class=2&username=&bbox=-132.94922053813937,7.710991655433217,-60.35156428813935,69.53451763078358&limit=50000
nevw (2024-03-26 15:35:16+00:00): Hi, I thing you may be triggering a few osmi errors. Please consider getting familiar with and using the Josm editor if you are intending to fix boundaries and multipolygons.
nevw (2024-03-26 15:35:59+00:00): …and the osmi errors…
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.37980&lat=-27.83807&zoom=14
nevw (2024-03-26 15:42:16+00:00): This blue indicated area is involved too…
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.32453&lat=-27.88732&zoom=13
user_11609320 (2024-03-26 01:34:25+00:00): secondary arterial
user_11609320 (2024-03-26 01:35:19+00:00): was downgraded from primary arterial
praise_you (2024-06-09 10:13:10+00:00): Hallo,
Wieso heißt dieser Wasserlauf Polsenz? Ich wohne in der Gegend und dieses Gewässer hat meines Wissens keinen Namen.
hlfan (2024-06-10 18:04:00+00:00): Hallo, vielen Dank für den Hinweis! Da ist mir der Name wohl nicht suspekt genug vorgekommen, der auf der basemap.at hier steht. Wahrscheinlich weil es nördlich der Traun tatsächlich eine Polsenz gibt. Im DORIS weboffice heißt der Wasserlauf "Zubringer Alm". Sagt dir der Name vielleicht was?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149155285
praise_you (2024-06-23 17:38:58+00:00): Hallo, entschuldige die späte Rückmeldung. Ich kenne nur die Polsenz zwischen Grieskirchen und Eferding, die über den Innbach in die Donau fließt. 
Das mit "Zubringer Alm" ist nur eine beschreibende Bezeichnung. In der Gegend wird das Gerinne nur als "Wasserlauf" bezeichnet.
 Mir ist noch was in diesem Changeset aufgefallen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1266334411 Das sollen ein Kanal sein? Der geht fast unter der Halle durch? Und vom Gelände kommt es mir auch sehr komisch vor. Ich werde es mir nochmals vor Ort ansehen.
praise_you (2024-06-23 18:30:35+00:00): Jetzt war ich gerade dort. Im Einlaufbereich habe ich nur den Durchlauf unter der Straße gesehen. Etwas, das in Richtung des langen Kanal geht, habe ich nicht gesehen. Den Auslauf habe ich mir nicht angesehen, denn der würde in einem privaten Bereich liegen.
hlfan (2024-06-29 04:54:57+00:00): So, ich hab jetzt mal in CS 153317349 den falschen Namen entfernt. Wie genau die oberflächlich sichtbaren Abschnitte verbunden sind, wenn überhaupt, wird wohl nicht so leicht herauszufinden sein.
dpolovinkin (2026-05-27 01:22:34+00:00): hi, you've added buildings which are not on any satellite here - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1266336835/history#map=19/34.649550/135.532464, and change is relatively recent

what's the source of that and why shouldn't I (or anybody else) remove them?
okadatsuneo_import (2026-05-27 01:46:13+00:00): Hi, This edit was imported from Japanese Plateau data about two years ago.
In recent images on Bing, the building appears to be gone.
Of course, if the building is gone based on recent aerial photographs or surveys, please feel free to delete it or add "removed:" tag.
dpolovinkin (2026-05-28 11:38:10+00:00): okay, thx! :)
Ryan Watern (2024-03-26 06:39:50+00:00): When making edits across a large area, in this case across the world I would recommend separating the edits into two different ones and uploading them separate. As when you make more than one edit in a large distance, you get a large box, so in this case because there's one edit in Montana and another in New Zealand this box stretches across the world.
arjunaraoc (2024-03-28 05:35:05+00:00): Please upload changes in a  small area as a separate changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149155579
MxxCon (2024-03-28 23:42:00+00:00): Unless you were able to define the actual dimensions of it, a simple plaque should probably be mapped just as a node.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149156048
MxxCon (2024-03-28 23:43:07+00:00): Also, based on the article name it should be subject:wikipedia= tag, since just wikipedia= is about that exact plaque.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149156048
IraGersh (2024-03-29 00:47:50+00:00): For dimensions I matched the aerial view.
IraGersh (2024-03-29 00:53:49+00:00): Its now subject:wikipedia.  Thanks.
MxxCon (2024-03-28 23:49:50+00:00): A simple mooring hook really shouldn't be tagged as an area.
I don't know what "cleat and spud" is, but these features should be tagged as seamark:mooring:category=post and seamark:mooring:category=bollard
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Seamarks/Moorings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149156248
IraGersh (2024-03-29 00:34:37+00:00): The cleat (area) is definitely seamark:type=mooring
I feel good about this as the cleat matches the picture very well.  Its not a single post which would be a bollard.
The spud is more complicated. I just left a note because its not a mooring item.  It is essentially a post though.  I cannot find anything that defines them.  If you want me to delete it I will. What a spud does is position the floating dock (I could not find an OSM applicable description of a floating dock) so that it kind rise and fall with the tides.  Sometimes spuds are affixed to work boats.
But big thanks for your guidance because I didn't know where to start with this. Now I know a bit where to look.
MxxCon (2024-03-28 23:52:05+00:00): This article describes the necessary tags related to solar panels: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:generator:source%3Dsolar

"plant:method=	photovoltaicfile:cleat_and_spud_at_chelsea_piers_pier_62.jpg" is most definitely invalid tag and should be fixed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149156543
MxxCon (2024-03-28 23:55:36+00:00): Also, iD and RapiD have separate presets for rooftop solar panels and solar panel plants(which this is not).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149156543
IraGersh (2024-03-29 00:45:07+00:00): Did you fix it?
MxxCon (2024-03-29 00:57:05+00:00): yup
IraGersh (2024-03-29 02:08:28+00:00): Big thanks for that.
emersonveenstra (2024-03-27 12:25:49+00:00): Hi there,

Looks like the opening hours of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2895393933 has a typo, could you please fix that? Thanks!
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-26 04:33:41+00:00): When mapping, please do not overlap areas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149157238
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-26 04:35:45+00:00): **Actually cleaned up golf course.
arjunaraoc (2024-03-28 05:37:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my improvement: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149251455
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149158915
dypa (2024-03-26 10:48:39+00:00): пожалуйста используйте для адресов https://rgis.spb.ru/mapui/

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149170459
frozenrabi (2024-06-14 05:28:29+00:00): Is this path or route for real? I'm afraid these are too narrow, steep routes(if it is). Please confirm the data source and reliability of this. Thank you!
Peter Van Geit (2024-06-17 04:58:21+00:00): Which of the 7 paths or 3 routes are you referring to? I mostly added hiking routes on top of existing OSM trails to put a proper hiking network across Nepal

https://ultrajourneys.org/great-himalayan-trail-nepal/
Soshal Distan Singh (2024-03-26 13:36:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149075229
marc__marc (2024-08-29 22:41:19+00:00): 讯息自动翻译，希望没有太多错误：） 你好 如果要改进，还应添加属性或连接节点以生成行并在这些行上添加属性。 亲切问候 马克
message d'origine avant traduction :
message traduit automatiquement, j'espère qu'il n'y a pas trop de fautes :)
Bonjour,
si vous souhaitez améliorer , vous devez aussi rajouter soit des attributs, soit connecter les noeuds pour faire des lignes et ajouter un attribut sur ces lignes.
Cordialement,
Marc
Soshal Distan Singh (2024-03-26 14:07:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149075229
RSydes (2024-03-26 06:37:55+00:00): Correction to description, having forgotten to replace the autofilled description (for a previous changeset): added a State Habitat Area.
marc__marc (2024-09-04 22:28:27+00:00): Bonjour,
BP 6 n'est pas un numéro de rue, il n'y a pas de numéro dans cette rue ?
Cordialement,
Marc
Malgouzou (2024-09-05 00:44:02+00:00): Bonjour, 

Aucun numéro de rue dans ce coin de la Nouvelle-Calédonie. (Idem à Lifou, Maré, Ouvéa par exemple)

Uniquement des boîtes postales. 

Cordialement, 

Michel
GOwin (2024-04-04 07:14:00+00:00): Perhaps you were thinking of addr2:street, rather than addr:street2 here?

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/compare/addr:street2/addr2:street
Timmy_Tesseract (2024-04-05 05:53:28+00:00): Yes I was. Thanks for the reminder!
GOwin (2024-04-05 09:11:07+00:00): 🫰
aTarom (2024-03-26 08:59:49+00:00): Hola, gràcies per editar,
a
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1243440970/history
en moure el node, l'ele no correspon, va bé actualitzar-lo al valor de la capa ràster de l'IGN (388 -> 425) o potser està malament l'elevació en aquesta capa?
Salutacions
goterris (2024-03-26 09:33:02+00:00): Sí, el node l'he situat al punt més alt però no he modificat l'alçada.
LockOnGuy (2024-03-27 16:44:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by changeset 149234145 and the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 149161152 and restore the buildings. note: most of them are damaged but till on the ground.
LockOnGuy (2024-03-27 16:54:34+00:00): Hello طائر الجنوب,       
I see you changed the name of this brownfield to a wrong name. I had to revert it in changeset 149233391 to the correct name that still on the government papers and bonds, as the name you replaced it with is wrong. I also noticed that you then removed the alt_name too from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/401896332/history by your other account "haider 73" assuming it's yours as your original username was "Haidar al-Rkabe البدري" before changing it to "طائر الجنوب". Please refen from such political motivated edits, and keep the real and correct names on the maps.     
Regards.
nickvet419 (2024-06-17 06:20:51+00:00): Acces for military bases should be Permit not private as public vehicles have access to the roads if they stop at the gate and receive a permit first.
dypa (2024-03-26 14:23:10+00:00): адрес указан по ошибочному указанию в яндексе, в ГАР ФИАС здание не существует

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149180474
Geo_Cop (2024-03-26 09:53:10+00:00): Hi Byenin, 
Please note: changesets should be local to avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province).
Yog Sot (2024-07-22 15:09:02+00:00): kiedy później? ;d
mat (2024-03-27 07:00:54+00:00): La voie qui longe la gare est-elle temporairement réservée aux bus ?
Ou est-ce définitif ?
Si c'est définitif, il faudrait probablement la transformer en highway=busway.
Sinon, y-a-t-il des travaux en cours ? Y-a-t-il une date de fin de prévue ?
Rodolphe Quiédeville (2024-03-29 07:38:18+00:00): C'est définitif, oui les travaux sont en cours, mais je ne connais pas la date de fin.
Ok pour mettre en busway
ClaudeLN (2024-11-13 15:59:58+00:00): Les travaux avancent mais la fin n'est pas prévue avant l'automne 2025
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-26 19:14:46+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149162219
andilocke (2024-04-06 06:55:24+00:00): Hallo Jonny22, wäre hier nicht besser das disuded-Präfix verwendet worden? Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix an.
Jonny22 (2024-04-08 13:49:35+00:00): Hey, vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Die Funktion kannte nicht, wäre hier aber passender gewesen. Kannst du das rückgängig machen/ ändern?
andilocke (2024-04-14 16:11:51+00:00): Ging mir genau so, wurde auch von einem anderen Mapper darauf hingewiesen. Ich konnte leider nicht herausfinden, wie man das rückgängig macht. Ich glaube, das können nur Spezialisten mit Spezialrechten. Ist aber auch nicht so schlimm. Letztendlich ist ja nichts kaputt gegangen.
Senihtu (2024-04-14 18:53:00+00:00): Ich komme nur ganz zufällig vorbei und ich kann mitteilen: nix is mit Sonderrechten beim Rückgängig machen. Bei josm gibt es eine Erweiterung namens reverter. Damit kann das sogar ich.  und bei osmcha hab ich schon die Möglickeit gesehen, ein changeset mit osm-revert zu öffnen (aber noch nicht ausprobiert). Können kann das jeder. aber bevor man das tut, sollte man noch mal drüber schlafen - vor allem, wenn es nicht das eigene Changeset ist...
andilocke (2024-04-28 17:57:30+00:00): Hallo Senihtu, vielen Dank! Kannte ich noch nicht. Ich hab mal damit in JOSM rum gespielt. Habs zwar nicht so ganz verstanden, aber einfache Änderungen wie diese können problemlos zurückgeholt werden. 

Hallo Jonny22, ich könnte das bei Gelegenheit machen, wenn Du einverstanden bist. Du bist ja mit iD unterwegs und kennst Dich vielleicht in JOSM nicht so gut aus.
andilocke (2024-06-01 13:19:45+00:00): Hallo Jonny22, 
Änderungen zurückgenommen und auf disused gesetzt.
osmuser63783 (2024-03-30 08:59:20+00:00): Hi, you have tagged Tilman's pass as sac_scale=hiking, trail_visibility=excellent. This was an accident I presume? Looking at the history of the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342432187/history, you added the whole length of Tilman’s pass to an existing path segment that previously only covered a small length of path in Langshisha Kharka (which I tagged as sac_scale=hiking).
Peter Van Geit (2024-04-03 05:17:56+00:00): That's correct. I extended the existing trail but was unaware that non-applicable tags would be taken forward. Can you help me in splitting the original trail and removing the tags? Not sure how to find the length of the original trail?
osmuser63783 (2024-04-05 17:19:05+00:00): Thanks. I still have my GPX file from when I walked to Langshisa Kharka so I know how far I mapped it as sac_scale=hiking at the time. But what tags should go on the new section over the pass? Looking at a walk report (https://www.thetrekblog.com/blog/2018/11/13/tillman-pass-nepal-langtang) I’m not sure that all of it can even be called a path. Have you been there?
osmuser63783 (2024-04-05 17:19:19+00:00): I’m worried that if we just leave it as highway=path with no other tags, outdoor apps will show it to people as a normal path that anyone can walk when you actually need experience and equipment and lots of preparation. At the very least we should put an appropriate sac_scale value, but I don’t know what would be the right value because I haven’t been there!

Or maybe a tag like route=mountaineering would be more appropriate, instead of highway=path?
Peter Van Geit (2024-04-07 16:45:48+00:00): I received the GPS log from someone else. Will check with him if we can specific the SAC scale for this section.
Peter Van Geit (2024-04-08 02:12:42+00:00): I got inputs from Dave Brophy who did this traverse. Do you have a whatsapp nr or email ID on which I can share the notes so we can figure out the appropriate SAC rate for the route?
osmuser63783 (2024-04-16 00:06:41+00:00): Thanks! That was a lot of really useful information. Based on the email I have updated the tags for the sections here.
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-26 19:12:18+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149163198
AndersAndersson (2024-03-26 09:05:46+00:00): Hej!
Ifall du inte märkt det så har en stor multipolygon med skog kraschat.
Men jag antar att du har som mål att göra markanvändningen mer detaljerad och sedan laga den.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/370799
L'imaginaire (2024-03-27 08:14:04+00:00): Dag Pieter,
Waar je de footway tekende, bots je in het midden op een muurtje. Fietsers zullen dus aan de lichten moeten oversteken, waar al een pad getekend was. Ik denk ook dat ze verplicht zijn om af te stappen als ze via die weg willen oversteken (we kunnen dit mappen als bicycle=dismount), wat denk jij?
Pieter Dumoulin (2024-03-27 08:53:57+00:00): Het probleem dat ik had, is dat er geen fietspad via bijvoorbeeld (routeyou) langsdaar kan getekend worden, terwijl je toch gemakkelijk door kunt. Veel beter dan de overgang aan de oude Brugseweg (ten Noorden), waar er geen lichten staan, en het levensgevaarlijk is om over te steken. Als dit kan opgelost worden met Bicylce= dismount, dan is dit voor  mij goed. Echt afstappen moet je er niet doen, maar waarschijnlijk kan routeyou hier wel mee weg dan.
L'imaginaire (2024-03-28 14:21:32+00:00): Ok, da's duidelijk, bedankt. Ik heb de oversteek aangepast en er bicycle=dismount op gezet. Ook even getest (op de voetgangerstunnel onder het spoor in Aalter): RouteYou kan hiermee overweg
L'imaginaire (2024-03-28 14:23:43+00:00): Houd er wel rekening mee dat het mogelijks even kan duren vooraleer Routeyou de wijziging integreert in hun routering.
Noktoborus (2024-04-30 09:44:45+00:00): Константин, здравствуйте.

В данной правке Вы добавили cycleway:right=share_busway на выделенную полосу для автобусов по улице Большая Зеленина.

Анализ местности показывает, что в данном месте нет велополосы/велодожки: https://yandex.ru/maps/2/saint-petersburg/?l=stv%2Csta&ll=30.282999%2C59.965566&mode=search&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=156.289382%2C0.062382&panorama%5Bfull%5D=true&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=30.281510%2C59.966428&panorama%5Bspan%5D=60.298456%2C26.294526&sll=30.282340%2C59.965960&text=59.965960%2C30.282340&z=17.63

Комбинация знаков "⛔" "🚲 кроме", говорит о том, что в данном запрещён поворот всем видам транспорта, кроме велосипеда, но не обязывает двигаться непосредственно по автобусной полосе.

cycleway:*=share_busway подразумевает наличие знаков 4.4.1. "Велосипедная дорожка"/4.4.2. "Конец велосипедной дорожки".

Не могли бы вы указать, где данные знаки размещены?
Noktoborus (2024-04-30 10:11:23+00:00): >  но не обязывает двигаться непосредственно по автобусной полосе.

Имеется ввиду, что в этом месте нет ни выделенных ни совмещённых велополос/велодорожек или велопешеходных дорожек;
A35K (2024-03-26 16:04:45+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Reperaturen an meinen Mapping Versuchen, leider bin ich mit dem Editor noch nicht sehr vertraut.
NeisBot (2024-03-26 08:34:02+00:00): Hello Ilya_Puchcow, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Marek-M (2024-03-26 11:09:51+00:00): Cześć, czy ta droga w zmienionym przebiegu faktycznie istnieje? Na ortofotomapie jej tam nie widać. Być może jest to tylko planowany przebieg tej drogi? W takiej sytuacji powinna ona być inaczej oznaczona, czyli:
```
highway=proposed
proposed=residential
```
pitahawk (2024-03-26 11:15:02+00:00): Przebieg drogi został zmieniony w ubiegłym roku, ortofotomapa jest starsza
Marek-M (2024-03-26 11:06:27+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za edycję. Chodniki, czyli `highway=footway` domyślnie mają przypisany tag `foot=yes`, więc dodawanie go tutaj jest zbędne.

Jednocześnie jeżeli jest to chodnik, to polskie prawo nie dopuszcza po nim jazdy rowerem. Wyjątkiem są chodniki z dodatkową tabliczką w stylu `nie dotyczy rowerów` i tylko w takiej sytuacji można dodać do chodnika tag `bicycle=yes`. Czy tutaj jest taka tabliczka?

Czy ten chodnik, który dodałeś https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1266413084 na pewno jest chodnikiem? Na Ortofotomapie wygląda raczej na przedept a nie na zorganizowaną drogę dla pieszych.
pitahawk (2024-03-26 11:13:41+00:00): Ten chodnik zezwala na przejazd rowerów, a nie ma go na ortofotomapie bo został wybudowany rok temu, mapa jest starsza
Marek-M (2024-03-26 11:16:27+00:00): Super, dzięki za odpowiedź.
eggie (2024-03-26 09:06:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-03-26 13:56:24+00:00): Dag Wouter De routerelatie van de N797 heb ik hersteld. 
Beter geen wegen opknippen met editor iD. Dan gaan de routerelaties stuk.

MVG
eggie
WouterEnsing (2024-03-26 13:59:07+00:00): Ok. Ik zal daarvoor JOSM weer gebruiken. Ik had in gedachten dat ik alleen wat kleine locale dingetjes zou aanpassen, maar hier heb ik per ongeluk toch een wat grotere weg geraakt.
eggie (2024-03-26 14:02:04+00:00): Yep...  De busroute bevatte ook nog een sorteerfout. Die heb ik net ook hersteld. JOSM gebruiken is dan echt een must.

Groet
eggie