piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nyampire (2024-11-30 02:26:07+00:00): Hello, thank you for your response.

I'm very pleased that you are aiming for an honest use of OSM under its rules.
With that in mind, I have a request, and I sincerely apologize:

* Would it be possible to suspend such edits for a short while?
* I would like to inquire with Kobe City about the possibility of use.

Sorry, the following might be too long...

First, let me explain the points regarding Kobe City's terms of use:
Indeed, Kobe City's terms of use are not very clear.

* The site's content is protected by intellectual property rights (primarily copyright) owned by Kobe City
* The background map's copyright belongs to Geo Technologies
* The aerial photos' copyright belongs to Pasco Corporation

In other words, Kobe City owns the intellectual property rights to the road name data used by rj_buchanan.
Moreover, the terms of use describe "content" being protected in a way that broadly defines the scope of protection, essentially stating that "factual information not protected by copyright is also content."
As mentioned in the "Content Usage" section, these data cannot be used beyond the limits permitted by copyright.
(While there are various nuanced details about the scope of copyright usage, essentially, it means it cannot exceed private use)

To summarize, while this data is "published", it may not be appropriate for use in OSM. As you know, just because something is published doesn't mean it's available for use in OSM.

Therefore, we need to inquire whether this road name data is usable in OSM.
Additionally, the road names shown on this site are primarily used for management purposes within the city office and are not the names actually displayed on roads.
(They are the types of names written on construction permit applications, for example)
Japan's address system differs from other countries, and road names have very low priority.
It's not much of a problem if roads don't have names.

The road edits in Toyonaka City appear to be from over 10 years ago, and these may need to be deleted as necessary.
Also, just because something is used in Google Maps does not mean it can be used in OSM - these are completely separate issues.

For instance, Oguchi Town in Aichi Prefecture has made a similar request to the city and obtained permission to use the materials.
I recognize that we need to follow similar steps to use the data without problems.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/35.330541/136.908027&layers=N
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Japan_OpenData/OguchiCho

I apologize for the lengthy message. I truly appreciate your understanding.
rj_buchanan (2024-12-01 00:40:20+00:00): Hi nyampire,

Thanks for your reply and insight. 

Although there's a difference in our interpretation of the terms, as you said, ultimately it's important that permission is sought to determine whether I can continue contributing or not. I have no problem halting any further edits until I hear back from you.

I live in Kobe and have seen a lot of the city in detail, and as I have said before my updates are not just the street names, but also adding hundreds of streets and pathways that should be in OSM. I do feel I have been contributing positively towards OSM, and more information is better than less.

It's positive that other cities have approved such requests, so let's hope you get a similar response from Kobe City.

Good luck and please keep in touch.
nyampire (2025-02-07 07:39:13+00:00): Hi rj_buchanan,
Finally got permission from Kobe City!
("Road names are defined under Road Law, so we can use them freely.")

I'll put this information on the OSM wiki as a separate page soon.
Sorry for late response, let's get back to mapping!
nyampire (2025-02-07 07:46:02+00:00): I forgot to mention that this permission is for Kobe City only. So, if you would like to use another city's data, please check the terms of use of those cities.

And surely, if you got any trouble, please let me know!
rj_buchanan (2025-02-07 07:52:32+00:00): Hi nyampire,

Great work! I had to find other hobbies while I was waiting for your confirmation! Haha. 

I will carry on mapping/updating just Kobe.

Prior to your first contact, I had mapped some of Ashiya-shi, and a small amount of Nishinomiya-shi, as I venture around those areas frequently too.

Their terms seem to be similar to Kobe City, so would it be possible for you to ask similar things of these two cities?

It's good to know the roads fall under Road Law and can be used freely.

Thank you very much for your help.
hatul (2025-02-17 10:44:57+00:00): בבקשה לא להעלות נקודות פרטיות למפה הציבורית
huntertur (2024-11-27 23:43:17+00:00): For any future editors: I had spoken with a city engineer about this during one of the pre-construction public meetings about the project. He told me the redundant southbound bike lane is intended for cyclists immediately going from Holton to Water (no need to get to the other side of the road just to cross back), and is to compensate for there not being a stoplight at Reservoir/Glover. If you can't safely get on the cycletrack before the bridge, there is a stoplight at Brady where the redundant painted lane ends, and there is a painted area showing you where to wait during the two-part turn onto the cycletrack itself.
BPTT (2024-12-07 04:50:57+00:00): Thanks for your edit - and this comment! I think it's really important to ask engineers these targeted questions.
BPTT (2024-12-07 05:01:21+00:00): I have some concerns about the cycletrack geometry, and I have a suggestion that avoids having to solve any current or future layer problems. Since this two-way cycle track is not grade separated, and since it is on the same roadway surface as Holton, I would suggest it be retagged onto the Holton roadways themselves. That way, it avoids any layer issues, avoids any rendering issues in other maps (we don't want drivers seeing a parallel way and thinking it's a road, and this would preclude any future access tag inconsistencies on a separate geometric object.
I'd recommend that Holton and Van Buren be tagged as:
bicycles=designated
cycleway:right=track
cycleway:left=lane (for the southbound Holton lane only)
oneway:bicycles=no (to ensure that routing algorithms still work for southbound riders in the cycle track on the right/northbound side of the road)
This way, it also simplifies the geometry of lines (and the Holton bridge area polygon) over the river, which is already pretty busy and confusing because of the marsupial bridge path underneath.
huntertur (2024-12-14 21:02:50+00:00): While I think this is a good idea, I have one concern with the suggestion.

Concrete medians have been slowly added to Van Buren Street over the past few months, and I assume more will be added once construction continues in the spring. This may result in Van Buren getting redrawn as two one-way highways, like how Walnut Street or Kilbourn Avenue are. Would your suggestion be compatible with this possible change?
BPTT (2024-12-15 00:23:12+00:00): I think I might be confused; do you mean the concrete barriers at being added to separate the two-way cycle-track from Van Buren's car traffic, or right down the middle of the cycle-track itself?
BPTT (2024-12-15 00:25:01+00:00): Please correct me if I'm wrong but VB and Holton both have - and will keep - protected two-way cycle-tracks and will not receive (as far as I know) one-way separated cycle-tracks (Kilbourn and Walnut).
huntertur (2024-12-15 00:25:58+00:00): There are concrete barriers separating the cycletrack from the automobile lanes. However, in various spots on Van Buren, there are medians being installed separating each direction of automobile traffic too.
BPTT (2024-12-15 00:53:27+00:00): Ok yeah, I still think mapping the cycle-tracks as =track on the roadway itself is still more accurate than by drawing them as separate geometries, since they are part of the roadways themselves and not separated paths.
BPTT (2025-04-03 21:37:15+00:00): Hi there - have you thought any more about this? I've been riding it more frequently lately and making some observations and notes, and I really do believe that retagging these cycletracks onto the roadways is the right way to go. If they were fully grade-separated or constructed separately of a different material, I think then it would be more accurate to have them as separate objects. But VB & Holton weren't even resurfaced (mostly), they just slapped down some paint lines on VB and jersey barriers on Holton. Retagging them onto the roadways would simplify a lot of future editing, and they'd still render pretty much the same too.
Hervé TUC (2025-10-07 07:53:32+00:00): Bonjour,

Dans cette modification tu as ajouté pleins de noms aux chemins de Borderouge. Exemple : Sente 6, Sente 8C, etc...

Quelle est la source de ces noms ?

Bonne journée
fb552 (2024-11-28 10:02:34+00:00): Non discuto sull'utilità del percorso ma almeno andava prolungato fino a via Fontenelle così da poter essere utilizzato da un router.
L'ho prolungato io adesso.
Ciao
philippec (2024-11-30 21:26:07+00:00): de ref dient om snel te kunnen vergelijken met de website van de gemeente
Pieter Vander Vennet (2024-11-30 23:50:54+00:00): Hallo AED Herne 1540,

Een beetje feedback

Bij "ref" moet enkel een referentienummer. Hier moet geen telefoonnummer bij.

Bij phone gaat het telefoonnummer dat gebeld kan worden voor onderhoud, typisch staat dit ook op het toestel vermeld.

Het algemene noodnummer (112) hoef je niet te vermelden; dat is niet relevant voor de specifieke AED.
nevw (2024-11-28 01:31:00+00:00): Hi, why has highway=crossing and crossing=zebra been replaced by highway=motor_junction .
The zebra crossing appears to be still present in imagery.
nevw (2024-11-28 01:38:55+00:00): at this position...  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26359194
fortera_au (2024-11-28 02:31:21+00:00): Some of these also don't appear to actually be at the junctions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159681615
fortera_au (2024-11-28 02:31:22+00:00): Some of these also don't appear to actually be at the junctions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159681615
nevw (2024-11-29 17:11:15+00:00): no response. I have moved the highway=motorway_junction back to the road junction from the zebra crossing at this position... https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26359194
CurlingMan13 (2024-11-28 05:25:12+00:00): Reviewed as requested.  good edit
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159681713
CurlingMan13 (2024-11-28 04:48:48+00:00): Reviewed.  Good changeset.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159681741
Paul Fisher (2024-11-30 23:29:49+00:00): Thank you for the review, curlingman13!
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-28 10:12:25+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159682085
SomeoneElse (2024-11-30 14:18:25+00:00): Hello c710,
What are you trying to test? 
Whatever it is, please don't use the live OpenStreetMap server for testing.  If you'd like help with whatever you are trying to do, please ask at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/help-and-support/7/none .

Best Regards,
Andy
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-28 10:12:32+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159682035
eggie (2024-11-28 07:07:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Svp geen adresinfo toevoegen aan gebouwomtrekken. Er zijn al adresnodes. Verder heb ik wat duplicated ways verwijderd. 
De tagging van langsliggende trottoirs zit al in de hoofdrijbaan met sidewalk=both. left en right.
Gebruikelijk is om dat zo te doen.
Die langsliggende voetpaden zorgen anders voor enorme omwegen in de routering. (Rode Kruislaan) 
Echt consensus is er niet.
parking_space is een onderdeel van de parkeerstroken. Die ontbreken nog hier.
amenity=parking
parking=street_side
orientation=diagonal.
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side
Je edits 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=159682197


MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
CurlingMan13 (2024-11-28 04:47:36+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM.  Couple things.  

When adding buildings (or other rectangular/square features), you can press "Q" on your keyboard to square the corners and give them right angles.

Also, when adding the address, be sure to input the correct info in the correct fields.  Zip code should be in zip code, housenumber in housenumber, etc.

I went ahead and made the changes for you here.  I encourage you to take a look.  Let me know if you have any questions.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159685389
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159683123
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
nevw (2024-12-02 23:22:58+00:00): H, outer rings can't join in multipolygons.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.75844&lat=-16.90288&zoom=19
You can use simple polygons instead.
flohoff (2024-11-28 08:29:01+00:00): Moin,
du hast hier an 2 Objekten ein addr:place=Detmold Nord angehängt. Ich vermute das ist falsch.

addr:place wird ja dann verwendet wenn es keine Straße gibt die so heisst, sondern Gebäude zu einem Ort gehören. Es gibt sowas noch aus der Vorkriegszeit wo die Häuser in Dörfern einfach durchnummeriert waren. 

Ich hab hier sowas in Rheda-Wiedenbrück mit "Bosfeld". Die liegen alle am Bosfelder Weg aber die Häuser haben die Addresse Bosfeld 60 z.b. - das ist dann addr:place weil es kein addr:street für diese Addresse gibt.

Das ist hier ja nicht der fall oder?

Flo
Kovoschiz (2024-11-28 07:07:04+00:00): `amenity=police` is used for public-facing police facilities. This is a complex of many units. It's mainly the division being the front office.
Kovoschiz (2024-11-28 07:07:33+00:00): 2. So this also duplicates with the other already created `=police`
StreetSurveyor (2024-12-02 14:51:09+00:00): Hi, did you delete Palmer Ave here?
Lordmcfuzz (2024-12-02 14:56:54+00:00): @streetsurveyor yes, the community garden has expanded into the space. Confirmed by 'up to date' Street view.
 79 Franklin St
https://maps.app.goo.gl/YvYCwnrahSQZdeBB9?g_st=ac
StreetSurveyor (2024-12-02 15:07:14+00:00): I would think the spot to the right still qualifies…maybe better suited as a pedestrian street now?
Lordmcfuzz (2024-12-02 15:20:53+00:00): Yeah I would probably quantify that as a sidewalk with an asphalt surface. I don't think I could say that it is Palmer ave as there is no longer a street sign there. I wonder if the city has any updated info on it. We do have a few signed/named 'sidewalk' style streets in somerville
okvipcomde (2024-11-28 03:53:15+00:00): https://okvip.com.de/
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1D2ZmrmkBjwCrPKMsTFkgTC91gclSixQZ
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17ib4FX756BpRg7slYo91npjRQVtQD7yo-A_Y_p1hlTc/edit?usp=drivesdk
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1St1kGjRWOiAYJpj0B7Uht-0oAHNzwmLT
https://sites.google.com/view/okvipcomde/home
https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1k9I7t6BsOIV4x8Cq0nj8xi-C5NN_lkA
https://okvipcomde.blogspot.com/2024/11/okvip.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TB-KkSIPND8
https://x.com/okvipcomde/status/1861971029054439934
https://spotifycreators-web.app.link/e/rpB7hjqKSOb
https://www.scoop.it/topic/okvip-by-nha-cai-okvip/p/4162619369/2024/11/28/okvip-nha-cai-ca-cuoc-truc-tuyen-uy-tin-1-viet-nam-2025
Warin61 (2026-03-26 05:42:22+00:00): It is a bit of a mess, insn't it!

Relation 2724782 scrub is well and truly broken .. should it be deleted? 

Way: 1338514652 and Way: 1338953826 should be combined into one way... There are probably a lot more confused things here.
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-28 10:12:57+00:00): Just a test?
BCNorwich (2024-11-29 07:25:16+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately, your test duplicated features already in the OSM database, so I removed them. Please take time to read the help and beginner guides. Need any help, please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
Supaplex (2024-12-04 11:44:01+00:00): 已經有了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12375851601
重複了
HellMap (2024-11-29 13:06:34+00:00): Sveiki!

Paldies par kartes papildināšanu.

Es pamanīju, ka šai un citām izmaiņām pieturām ir pielikti `passenger_information_display=yes`.[1] Šis tegs parasti nozīmē elektronisku reāllaika displeju kā sastopami autoostās vai lielākās vilcienu stacijās. Latvijā parastajām autobusu pieturām tādu, cik zinu, nekur nav. Visticamāk, šeit bija domāti `departures_board=*`.[2] Tas ir parastajām "laiku sarakstu lapiņām" uz stabiem, kas sastopami gandrīz visās pieturās.

Paldies

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:passenger_information_display

[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:departures_board
Koknese (2024-12-02 05:44:17+00:00): Sveiki!

Es domāju, ka gan jau būšu kaut ko nepareizi nospiedis. Paldies, ka pamanījāt!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:16:11+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165095056
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-29 07:06:25+00:00): Partly revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159572298
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-29 07:06:30+00:00): Thanks.w
Kristjan ESPERANTO (2025-04-04 21:07:48+00:00): @pitscheplatsch Do you know why the deletions took place? That should be undone, right?
NeisReview (2025-04-05 05:22:14+00:00): Hej Kristjan, I think node 12373620973 was a test by the mapper and the deletion of node 3815077900 should be undone. What do you think?
Kristjan ESPERANTO (2025-04-06 05:29:28+00:00): Hej @NeisReview, that's how it looks to me too. I have restored 3815077900 :-)
NeisReview (2025-04-06 06:41:52+00:00): Thanks, Kristjan.
Lejun (2024-11-28 08:19:35+00:00): Could you explain how you mapped the geometry of the roundabout? AFAIK the latest aerial imagery were taken way before the construction, and I couldn’t find any source about neither its centerpoint or its footprint.
luiswoo (2024-11-30 15:04:18+00:00): При чём тут "Роща Ска" если это какой-то бывший военный городок (меня бы не удивило, если бы и рощу ска под застройку пустили). Хотя тоже какая-то зелень для местных была...
Inetman (2024-11-30 20:41:36+00:00): Ну так это была бывшая тренировочная база СКА, роща соответственно... Согласен, что несколько путаница с рощей на Чкаловском, не совсем верно выразился. Факта это, увы, не отменяет: роща была отменная, и заброшки неплохие. А теперь там будут 26-этажки...
NieWnen (2024-11-28 18:42:07+00:00): Hej,
na bingu widać, że zakaz wjazdu jest dopiero na wysokości końca bloku z nr 10. Dojazd do punktu przedszkolnego/parkingu.

Zrobiłem korektę, chyba że macie świeższe dane, że przesunęli oznakowanie, to można cofnąć.
Sebastian | Yanosik (2024-11-29 07:16:52+00:00): Cześć!
Dzięki za poprawkę. Wiedziałem tylko, że jest dojazd do parkingu od Alei Niepodległości, więc korekta jak najbardziej zostaje ;)
jeslop (2024-11-28 13:12:44+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159701404
eggie (2024-11-28 08:26:25+00:00): Dag Johan,

noexit=yes alleen toevoegen als de weg niet verder gaat. 
Ik heb die tagging verwijderd. 

Een bollard op een kruispunt is 'bijna fysiek' onmogelijk. Waar staat dat paaltje echt?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=159688430

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-11-28 08:46:08+00:00): Ik heb wat aangepast mbv van OBLIEK Slagboom&Peeters.
Die paden daar zijn denk ik geen fietspaden, maar highway=path
Op twee plaatsen barrier=cyclebarrier toegevoegd. Die houden ook autoverkeer tegen. 

MVG
eggie
JohanWetering (2024-11-28 09:02:15+00:00): prima! dankje!
eggie (2024-11-28 09:13:26+00:00): Dat ene paaltje dat op die kruising stond (heb ik vewijderd)  zou natuurlijk wel iets zuidelijker kunnen staan. Op de foto kan ik het niet goed zien. 
Dat hele pleintje is niet voor autoverkeer bedoeld. 
Maar goed... Het zal door die ene  bollard bij nr 23 niet meer voor doorgaand autoverkeer routeren.
Wel lijkt het me handig om removable=yes  of fixed=yes toe te voegen en evt emergency=yes of no 
Het lijkt me een uitneembaar paaltje. 
Mapse
eggie
jhaluska80 (2024-11-29 09:30:05+00:00): Howdy.  I map nearby.  I see you're adding some houses.  Just thought you should know the proper way to add the addresses to building is not the name field, it's an address field with the number.  The exact tag is addr:housenumber.
trial (2026-02-23 20:47:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10905020876, complète tes sites web ;-) https://vyv-enfance.fr/creches/creche-les-ptits-loups-de-mer
muralito (2024-11-28 14:38:27+00:00): Hi DylaniaCat. Thanks for the changeset, but please keep it within a smaller geographic region, within a smaller bbox.
aharvey (2025-02-20 05:59:07+00:00): I've reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12381862239/history in this case you added a highway=crossing between the surface road and the underground walkway. Yes iD issued a warning here, but it's a false positive. Please take care when editing.
silversurfer83 (2024-11-28 21:14:56+00:00): Hi :)

kurzes Feedback, da du darum gebeten hast:

Wenn auf unbestimmte Zeit gesperrt ist access=no schon ok.

Was bei sowas immer hilfreich ist: ein "note=Sperrung aus §Grund" mit an die Abschnitte, da sich nicht alle zu dieser Änderung hier hangeln, wo du ja vorbildlich die PM von Hessen Mobil angehangen hast.

cheers
silversurfer83
uncledata (2024-12-01 08:34:43+00:00): Eventuell werden die Einschränkungen ja auch teilweise zurückgenommen, z. B. für Fußgänger, Radfahrer etc.

In diesem Fall müsste hier nachgearbeitet werden, da fand ich den Thread ganz informativ.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/strassensperrung-wg-baustelle-wie-editieren/67836/2
NeisBot (2024-11-28 08:06:41+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and changesets, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-29 07:19:08+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159729535
eggie (2024-11-28 08:50:14+00:00): Dag AvN

Het staat hier nog steeds op vehicle=no ?
Dus routeren zal het niet.
Er staat ook een note=Viaduct gesloten voor alle verkeer behalve voetgangers en fietsers: https://www.prorail.nl/nieuws/prorail-gaat-viaduct-veestraat-sittard-vernieuwen
en een fixme=Tijdelijke gesloten situatie, totdat ProRail een nieuw viaduct gebouwd heeft.

Geldt dat niet meer.
Het zal zo ook niet routeren voor  de Brandweer of je moet emergency=yes toevoegen.
Hoe is de actuele situatie? 
MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-30 13:22:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540528915

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
jeslop (2024-11-28 13:12:45+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159701404