piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2023-04-24 17:24:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If you add access=no, nobody can use the path (also the owner). Please use access=private, if the owner can use the path.
wribln (2023-04-24 16:24:51+00:00): Lage von Aufgang 8 korrigiert
Marc_ch (2023-04-24 18:08:41+00:00): very poor "I'll not fix a buggus app"
https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/4969
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-24 18:19:34+00:00): recycling:*=only from what I checked is extremely rare, not documented as valid, no evidence of being considered valid and is not needed due to semantics of recycling:*=*

(maybe wiki is wrong, in such case it should be discussed and maybe amended - but editors should not be expected to handle every single possible invalid tagging)
Marc_ch (2023-04-24 18:08:47+00:00): very poor "I'll not fix a buggus app"
https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/4969
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-24 18:19:36+00:00): recycling:*=only from what I checked is extremely rare, not documented as valid, no evidence of being considered valid and is not needed due to semantics of recycling:*=*

(maybe wiki is wrong, in such case it should be discussed and maybe amended - but editors should not be expected to handle every single possible invalid tagging)
Anton Khorev (2023-06-06 16:13:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10837455432

"Полушки", которые https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4371080 и https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D1%81%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%8C_%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2) , ещё существуют?
cserpell (2023-04-24 20:03:29+00:00): Por favor ser más cuidadoso con ortografía (en este caso, quedó "Lotep" en vez de "Loteo".
cserpell (2023-04-24 20:04:45+00:00): Otra ayuda para posteriores ediciones: puedes cuadrar los edificios con la letra "q" en el editor, o con el botón derecho.
5m4u9 (2023-04-26 04:46:12+00:00): Hi, 

I'm not sure, that the ramps of the pedestrian walkway are bridges 🤔, but they have the same structure and support (bridge:structure=beam & bridge:support=pier).
GbabethemapGod (2023-04-27 15:20:58+00:00): Hello 5m4u9,

I changed this portion to a bridge because I was trying to prevent crossing highways. It was flagged as a warning in the validator. As you can see in Mapillary, https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=455582978866507, the portion is still elevated.

Thank you,

GbabethemapGod
Luzandro (2023-04-24 18:35:55+00:00): Hallo,

markiere private swimming pools bitte mit access=private

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135311142
Dornbacher (2023-04-24 19:42:59+00:00): Hallo Luzandro, danke für den Hinweis, war mir leider nicht bewusst und werde ich berücksichtigen, dachte das wäre automatisch klar. lG D.
jcr83 (2023-04-25 13:24:03+00:00): Bonjour,
Il me semble que oneway=no est la valeur par défaut, quel est donc l'intérêt de l'ajouter ?
Olav63 (2023-04-30 10:08:16+00:00): Bonjour, par défaut il est supposé que la voie est à double sens. Si on indique que oneway=no, on précise qu'il est sûr que la voie est à double sens. C'est plus fiable comme information.
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-24 17:17:43+00:00): What source did you use?  It looks like it could be unnamed.
user_5359 (2023-04-26 06:24:32+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/340113717. What is the mean of the tags 
gode immunita ecclessiastica = no
immunita ecclesias = no
?
NL342 (2023-04-26 14:06:08+00:00): There was a period in Malta in which fugitives on the run could find refuge in certain chapels and churches without fear of being apprehended by the authorities. This was called immunita ecclesias. Whether a church / chapel could give refuge was a matter of agreement between the Roman Catholic Church and the authorities. If a church / chapel could not give refuge it would have written "Non gode immunita ecclesias". When I tried to document this, the keytag disappeared. That is the reason for the double entry.
Any suggestions how to document this? Thanks.
user_5359 (2023-04-26 15:11:43+00:00): Please remember that the keys should be in British English without spaces. There are some keys with refugee (https://taginfo.osm.org/search?q=refug#keys) but none really fit at the moment.
NL342 (2023-04-27 18:29:12+00:00): Did not know about this tag search tool, thanks!  :)
refugee would not work, because refugee means a person fleeing political persecution. This concept is more like places in which there can absolutely be no violence, even if the violence is necessary to apprehend a criminal.
Gode immunita ecclesias is an archaic practice. It has not been practiced in Malta certainly not after 1798. I am not sure that currently there are places where such a practice is held.  I think that in this case using Latin words can be acceptable, much like how we use the word "genus".
How about the tag "gode_immunita_ecclesias" or "immunita_ecclesias"? What do you think?
user_5359 (2023-04-27 18:54:43+00:00): 
There is the term Kirchenasyl in Germany (wikidata use the english word sanctuary) unfortunately there is only a Wikipedia EIntrag for three languages (except German niderländisch (Kerkasiel) and Swedish (Kyrkoasyl)).
NL342 (2023-04-27 19:06:20+00:00): Actually sanctuary is a good translation. What I am not sure of is, if a user sees the tag sanctuary, will he realise that this tag refers to a specific period in history and does no longer apply?
user_5359 (2023-04-27 20:02:43+00:00): If you want the year of termination or the time period, you could work with sanctuary:-1765 (or sanctuary:1234-1765). All years are arbitrarily invented. The method has the advantage that you could also note different states in the past if necessary.
NL342 (2023-04-27 20:13:26+00:00): That's a great idea. 
Maybe sanctuary: Knights Period? or sanctuary: non gode immunita ecclessias. Because to write dates would require more research rather than seeing the plaque on the church / chapel,
msevilla00 (2023-04-25 16:26:18+00:00): Una última cosa ¿tenemos permiso del ICV-AVL para usar sus datos? si no es así nos estás poniendo en un compromiso pues NO podemos usar fuentes de las que no tengamos permiso EXPLICITO para usar. En IGN*, por ejemplo si nos da permiso pero no recuerdo si el ICV-AVL nos lo ha dado. Por favor cerciorate de ello.
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Importaci%C3%B3n_IGN#Licencia
Jordi MF (2023-04-25 17:06:58+00:00): Hola jpsa,
No tenemos permiso para usar los datos del ICV, pero sí de la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua. Así que solamente puedes usar los usar los datos toponímicos, pero no los demás datos que ofrece el ICV.

Por tanto, no indiques que estás usando los datos del ICV como fuente porque no es correcto, da lugar a confusión y alguien podría alegar un mal uso de datos.

Saludos,
Jordi
jpsa2023 (2023-04-25 17:19:36+00:00): Gracias por vuestros comentarios, que me enseñan a colaborar correctamernte en OSM. Evitaré usar el nombre de ICV. Sólo he utilizado la toponimia de la AVL, aunque la extraigo del Nomenclator que ofrece el visor de ICV. Es lo que he querido decir con ICV_AVL.
jeslop (2023-04-26 15:06:30+00:00): Ten en cuenta esto para los comentarios de los conjuntos de cambios: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
Igualmente, pradera no es un valor válido para la etiqueta surface: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:surface

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-29 09:09:17+00:00): Please don't add temporary features.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135312776
user_5359 (2023-04-26 07:25:47+00:00): Hello! Please have  look on http://www.osm.org/way/1165160215. What is the mean of the tags
    AREA_KM2 = 87.452
    CD_MUN = 2516755
    NM_MUN = Tenório
    SIGLA_UF = PB
?
ianlopez1115 (2023-04-25 11:10:10+00:00): Way 546646344 (structure close to the southern edge of Bluff Avenue) may have been mistagged as landuse=residential, retagged as building=house in changeset 135337952
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135313241
ZeLonewolf (2023-04-25 11:28:13+00:00): Thanks for fixing it!
mavl (2024-11-13 10:14:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159083843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
Hidoo00 (2023-04-25 21:14:43+00:00): Hi,
You have tagged buildings with "Building=True". Just so you're aware, we never use capitals except in names and abbreviations. Also, for general buildings, the correct tag would be "building=yes". I have fixed all the buildings you have mapped so far, so I wish you the best with further mapping!
t_ja (2023-04-24 19:13:10+00:00): Ahoj,
aký má význam pridávať neúplnú adresu, t.j. bez súpisného a orientačného čísla?
Bez týchto čísel nie je čo vyhľadávať...

T.
Spider 001757 (2023-04-26 17:16:45+00:00): Dobrý večer.
Ďakujem za správu. Ja som vždy takto pridával aj neúplné adresy, myslel som si, že to je potrebné kvôli všeobecnému prehľadu (napr. addr:city pre obec atď.) alebo pri budovách vo výstavbe, kde by sa neskôr daná adresa aj tak musela pridať. Ak to takto nemá žiaden zmysel, v poriadku. Budem teda dávať tam, kde je s. č. / or. č.
Ďakujem a prajem pekný večer.
SekeRob (2023-04-24 18:32:47+00:00): argh, Cellino Attanasio landcover and use, large calanchi zones. TBC
SomeoneElse (2023-04-24 23:33:27+00:00): Hello swordslife, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Please use changeset comments that explain a bit more about what you are doing than simply "new" or "change".
Any Questions, please don't hesitate to ask.
Best Regards,
Andy
Tatfahren (2023-04-24 19:26:49+00:00): Source=Esri
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-03 11:00:29+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=kebab f
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326130899/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=kebab
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Fritzen_21 (2024-03-04 17:14:30+00:00): Hello!
Thanks for pointing that out. It was indeed a typo.
I've fixed it now to "cuisine=kebab;german" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326130899/history.
Best regards
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-26 15:47:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Dantyszka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10837819518
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10837819519
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10837819520
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10837819521
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10837819522
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10837819523

"Ildefonsa Gałczyńskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10837819536
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10837819537

"Rataja":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10837819752

"Chopina":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10837819808
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10837819809

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Bąbel (2023-04-26 19:48:32+00:00): Skąd...  ta wiedza o obiektach  adres Powst Wawy 14 i 16 + szopa. Fakt BYŁY budynki, jednorodzinne rudery. poszły pod młotek budowlańców, został plac dzisiaj dziki parking.
G_P_J (2023-04-26 20:11:24+00:00): Powstańców Warszawy poprawione. Zmyliła mnie ortofotomapa. Jeden budynek był, a reszta wyglądała, jak plac budowy.
G_P_J (2023-04-26 20:44:17+00:00): Nazwy ulic poprawione.
NieWnen (2025-01-24 11:21:28+00:00): To nie są unclassified. Unclassified to drogi łączące miejscowości.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dunclassified
mrcn (2025-01-24 13:35:07+00:00): OK. Nie są to też tracks. Zmienię na residential.
eggie (2023-04-24 20:06:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Helaas kun je met een simpele editor als iD geen routerelaties bewerken. Je relatie gaat dan stuk. Hier dus ook.
Bewerken gaat alleen maar met editor JOSM.
 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-04-24 20:19:57+00:00): De routerelaties kustpad hersteld.
Zodra je gaat knippen in een relatie met editor iD gaat de volgorde van de froutedelen verloren .. Ook in de andere relaties .. en er lopen er hier meer.
Vooral lange routes zijn lastig te herstellen. 
Dus het advies is om over te stappen naar editor JOSM
MVG
eggie
avinet_ua (2023-04-24 22:49:58+00:00): зараз під час війни малювати лінії леп це дуже актуально? без світла мало сидів? закінчуй з цим і малюй краще села - там роботи огого.
Kartläggarn (2023-04-24 19:20:53+00:00): gjorde flera små ändringar och lade till vissa landmärken för att förbättra kartläggningen i varnehm
eggie (2023-04-24 20:26:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Alle begin is moeilijk.. 
feedback Eigenlijk loopt de weg gewoon door. Er ligt alleen een betonblok. Kunnen fietsers en voetgangers daar niet door?
Nu heb je een stuk weg verwijderd.
Een betonblok kunnen je op een node zetten met barrier=block
en dan vervolgens de accesstags
Verder graag de BAG data niet verwijderen van de adresnodes.
Deze is nodig voor periodieke updates

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-04-24 20:49:50+00:00): Van de Burgemeester Van de Brandelerlaan heb ik oneway=yes verwijderd. Dat kan onmogelijk, want dan zit je daar gevangen als automobilist. 
De Burgemeester Van de Brandelerlaan heb ik weer een stukje doorgetrokken en een block in de weg gelegd. Het zal inderdaad niet de bedoeling zijn dat hier een doorgang is. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-04-28 08:06:08+00:00): Dag Josh.. Je hebt verder geen reactie meer gegeven. Ik heb de namen van de speeltuintjes verwijderd.
Er is al een straatnaam. 
MVG'eggie
eggie (2023-04-24 20:30:05+00:00): Josh.. 
In OSM taggen we bij op de adresnode. Je hoeft dus geen adressen aan te maken op de gebouwen. Ik heb de info verplaatst naar de adresnode.
MVG
eggie
josh-nl (2023-05-02 18:34:09+00:00): Sorry dat ik nu pas reageer op de Wijzigingen. Ik ben er net pas achter dat er een overzicht met antwoorden is.

Dankjewel voor de feedback.
Fischkopp0815 (2023-04-25 06:33:41+00:00): Osmose findet hier die Adressen Holstenstr. 2&4 merkwürdig. Sind die richtig? Sind das ev. Holstentor 2&4? Bitte prüfe das mal.
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=18&lat=54.151221&lon=9.432937&item=2060&level=1%2C2%2C3
puma515 (2023-04-25 11:50:43+00:00): Danke für den hinweis. 
Da habe ich mich vertippt.
Vor ort ist dieser Teil der Straße mit Holstentor ausgeschildert habe das nun bei den 2 Häusern angepasst.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135339942
eggie (2023-04-24 20:31:45+00:00): Josh  name=Speeltuin het parkje  niet toevoegen.
Dat is vast niet de naam van de speeltuin. Dit geldt waarschijnlijk ook voor name=Speeltuin Burg. vd. Dommisseplantsoen

Vaak hebben die speeltuintjes geen officiële naam.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-04-24 20:34:24+00:00): De namen met ik van de speeltuinen ge haald. De spelling klopte ook niet 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=135316873

Groet eggie
ftrebien (2025-03-11 00:31:21+00:00): Há anos esses radares estão bem sinalizados com 60 km/h.
eggie (2023-04-24 20:37:12+00:00): Maak gebruik van de bestaande adresnodes. Die heb je nu verwijderd.
Verder heb je een fietsenwinkel Peter Smit verplaatst. Was dat de bedoeling?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=135317310

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-04-24 20:38:23+00:00): BAG adresnode hersteld
eggie (2023-04-24 20:57:17+00:00): Fietsenwinkel op adresnode gezet.
josh-nl (2023-05-02 18:32:31+00:00): Ok bedankt.

Idd de fietswinkel adres node staat nu goed.
1998alexkane (2023-04-29 20:18:50+00:00): Which classification standards are these? A least on the draft for the Illinois standards it says that certain primary roads may be primary: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Illinois/Highway_Classification
nickvet419 (2023-04-30 07:08:19+00:00): Was sticking to US and State routes marked as primary. Major buisness lined roads that traverse the highways and rivers as secondary, other major roads and county routes as tertiary, separated highways as motorway, and partially separated highways / connector highways as trunk.   At least that is what is was originally within the Chicago area until someone started playing around with an unfinished proposal. 
I've toyed a bit upgrading some of the loop area streets as primary for connectivity, part of michigan avenue, ohio street, ida b wells. but at what point do you not just mark all of the major roads as primary? Those roads dont nessesarily mean it is the prefered rout of everyone, or that its even the fastest route though the area.   The US/state routes from my experience are actually better to drive because they have more lanes and less traffic lights along those routes.   It really needs to be discussed a bit more.
nickvet419 (2023-04-30 07:13:42+00:00): The discussion and collaboration died when OSM community ambassador Dirk Munson left the company. I havn't seen any meetups since.
nickvet419 (2023-04-30 08:07:06+00:00): i made a page for the Chicago metro area for discussion. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Chicago_Area/Highway_Classification
yelisey90 (2023-04-26 11:25:21+00:00): both are marked as A / ა. Maybe one of them should be B / ბ ?
mueschel (2023-04-29 16:39:13+00:00): Hi,
you used the term "electric_scooter" here, which is very ambiguous. What kind of vehicles are sold and serviced here?
See also:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ElectricScooters
maraf24 (2023-05-14 08:58:56+00:00): Cześć.
Możesz podać źródło informujące o trwającej tu budowieparku? A może sam tam byłeś?
black_flag_baby (2023-05-14 10:56:19+00:00): Hej
Byłem tam, budowa trwa w najlepsze od tygodni, źródło poza FB różnych instytucji miejskich jak ZZM, rada osiedla Muchobór Wielki czy profil prezydenta to:
Ogłoszenie o przetargu na stronie ZZM - https://zzm.wroc.pl/zp-tp-220-4-2023-dp-zagospodarowanie-terenu-zieleni-przy-ul-kunickiego-we-wroclawiu-dz-nr-5-am-19-obreb-muchobor-wielki-projekt-realizowany-w-ramach-programu-rewitalizacji-zi/
Przetarg wraz z dokumentacją przetargową (w tym czytelny PZT) i wynikiem przetargu - https://zzm-wroc.ezamawiajacy.pl/pn/zzm-wroc/demand/notice/public/82476/details
projekt z WBO - https://www.wroclaw.pl/budzet-obywatelski-wroclaw/projekty-2022/projekt,id,232
Investmap - https://investmap.pl/inwestycja/park-kunickiego,13138.html
SomeoneElse (2023-04-24 23:44:46+00:00): Hello,
We'll have to undo some of your changes in the area because of some of your changes have broken relations here.  An example before: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1ubr and after https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1ubs .
I'll revert these problematical edits so that you can continue editing with unbroken relations.
Best Regards,
Andy
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-26 15:46:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1957432477

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2023-04-26 06:13:21+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/257214958. What is the mean of the tag -- = ?
Thth (2024-09-05 23:53:16+00:00): it means the cursor was on the wrong widget when i was trying to zoom, i guess.
has been removed by now.
1998alexkane (2023-04-29 20:17:02+00:00): I don't believe Historic US-66 really belongs in ref=*, nor should it really be considered for highway classification, given that is is primarily a tourist route.
nickvet419 (2023-04-30 06:41:22+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging/Routes#Honorary_and_Tourist_Routes  I did give it an extra HIST as that is what the signage says.
1998alexkane (2023-05-22 13:16:27+00:00): It probably shouldn't be primary simply because of this route designation nonetheless (as it is no longer a federal highway). Also by OSM convention touristic routes are usually not tagged with ref=* (the Lake Michigan Circle Tour isn't, for example)
nickvet419 (2023-05-22 18:58:49+00:00): I can agree to the class.
Map-Peter (2023-04-25 18:36:29+00:00): Hallo Xaver,
 
bitte schaue dir das in Zukunft erst einmal richtig an, denn hier gab diverse Hinweise das deine aktuelle Änderung zum Restaurant bereits auf veraltetem Wissen beruht. siehe Version #12 und #13: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/671777409/history (start_date ; end_date ; anderer operator ; sogar zwei Links zu Zeitungsartikeln ...)
 
Wenn du in Zukunft ein fixme=* entfernst und es aber in OSM gar nicht behoben hast, dann ist das auch eine Art von Vandalismus -> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Vandalismus .
 
insgesamt:  
:-(
 
Gruß Peter
nitsuj115 (2023-04-24 20:56:58+00:00): Hair Salon is located in what was previously an alley between buildings 3062610 and 3062611.  However, I cannot find any official documentation on this building from NYC Dept of Buildings.

https://www.facebook.com/Noordwyck/photos/pb.100030921472441.-2207520000./1293616520753445/?type=3
wille (2023-04-25 12:42:14+00:00): Oi, Patrícia!! A tag operator deve ser utilizada para denominar a instituição que opera um lugar, por exemplo: a prefeitura ou o governo do estado é o operador de uma escola pública. Além disso, não é necessário mapear com ponto e área o mesmo local.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135319044
Trevor_1 (2023-05-14 15:58:21+00:00): Hola. Aqui en OpenStreetMap, la etiqueta "city" es solo para las ciudades mas grandes en un estado. La mayoria de las ciudades con un population de menos de 50,000 deben ser clasificados como "town"
cuzi (2024-04-22 10:00:21+00:00): FYI https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4092910
Syl (2023-08-25 15:26:33+00:00): Bonjour, pour les piles de pont c'est "bridge:support"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge:support
Je viens de corriger.
BaboucheVerte (2023-08-26 03:12:08+00:00): Merci pour le lien vers le wiki, je n'avais pas trouvé !
jpennycook (2023-04-25 08:23:13+00:00): Hi!

What was the source of this route?  I'm not aware that it's signposted in Basingstoke or Dummer, and the roads through Southwood Farm (e.g.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97973019 ) were behind locked gates and fences the last time I looked.

Jon
jpennycook (2023-04-25 08:39:19+00:00): Also, was there a reason why bicycle access was removed from the section of path linking the bridleway to Pack Lane here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196574703
AlwynWellington (2023-04-25 18:07:11+00:00): The source for this version of S James Way is maps prepared by British Pilgrimage Trust and trip notes from others.

The bicycle access for that small segment has been restored - accidental removal.

I appreciate any other observations you have that could be used to help improve this route.
AlwynWellington (2023-05-01 01:52:34+00:00): Gidday
Have you had a further look at the use of S James Way that concerned you?

I have now completed mapping the route to Southampton and noted signage in various places.
jpennycook (2023-05-01 09:56:00+00:00): Hi!
I'm still concerned about this private road (and the one going past the farmhouse) being marked as part of the route: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97973019
marc__marc (2023-06-07 23:45:44+00:00): Bonjour,
la relation associatedStreet sert a éviter de dupliquer (entre autre) le nom de rue (attribut addr:street) sur chacune des adresses. du coup il faut soit supprimer le nom de rue de chacun des adresses soit changer le type de relation en street.
j'ai fais ce dernier point en attendant votre retour.
Cordialement,
Marc
ChehrehBargi (2024-04-17 10:03:47+00:00): Hello, you have drawn an obstacle on Sardar Martyr Shapur Barzegar Street in , which you probably forgot to remove. I will fix it.