piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2023-08-30 09:20:33+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
please don't connect nodes of buildings to each other. Each building should be considered as an individual building.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140507859
user_20153556 (2023-09-01 18:34:14+00:00): This changeset misspelled many names, such as changing the name of Snapdragon Pl to "Snapdragon Dr"- simply look on, say, PAW maps or Apple maps to see the correct road names.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140692068
eggie (2023-08-28 20:01:03+00:00): Dag Ron.. Beter niets aan adresnodes veranderen behalve evt naar de goed plek schuiven.
Nu komt nr 79 2x voor en nr 27 is verdwenen.
Hier liggen de adresnodes gewoon heel dicht tegen elkaar aan. Met editor iD heb je geen overzicht. 
Ik draai je wijziging even terug.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-08-28 20:02:05+00:00): reverted by changeset #140511200
eggie (2023-08-28 20:08:47+00:00): Ron,
Is er ook een straat De Gashouder?
Gr eggie
Ron de Muijnck (2023-08-29 08:36:48+00:00): Dag Eggie,
De veranderingen gingen per ongeluk. Ik had een voor mij nieuw programma op mijn Ubuntu PC geïnstalleerd: https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Maps
Ik probeerde hierin de locatie te vinden waar ik sinds kort woon (De Gashouder 79). Ik had niet het idee dat ik was ingelogd als mapper.
Dank voor het terugdraaien van de onbedoelde wijzigingen.
Ik zoek uit hoe de straat De Gashouder precies loopt met kenmerken.
Groet! Ron
eggie (2023-08-29 08:45:19+00:00): Top... wellicht heb je wat aan de laatste foto van half augustus
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=29-08-2022&loc=52.45077%2C4.820273%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-08-16&acqid=20230816_110741_PNEO-03_1_1&sensor=Pleiades-NEO

De construction heb ik al verrwijderd.
Het gebouw bij de Gashouder staat nog niet ingemeten in de BGT. Dat heb ik uitgelijnd mbv de PDOK
De gebouwen bij de Industrieel heb ik wel mbv de BGT uitgelijnd. Die lagen ook eerst nog uit het lood.
MVG
eggie



Groet
eggie
Frans S (2023-08-30 10:00:38+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please solve the issues before you upload your mapping.

About tagging of paths.
Footpath is not to be used here.
Just tag narrow traces as path.
Best regards
mavl (2023-09-03 13:18:08+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удаляет данные. Удалённые данные восстановлены.
maciek-szn (2023-08-28 19:24:41+00:00): Przestań w końcu zmyślać nazwy przystanków.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140509403
maciek-szn (2023-08-28 19:26:33+00:00): Wycofane. Blokada, którą dostałeś za wandalizmy była za krótka? Chcesz dłuższą?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140509469
damianeue (2023-08-28 19:31:09+00:00): also fixed and added buildings in Via Vracone/Regolizie
lefuturiste (2023-08-28 19:45:22+00:00): Merci !
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-30 05:01:10+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140568549
lefuturiste (2023-08-28 19:44:26+00:00): Hello, Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap.
The next time you are doing contributions, could you please consider to split you work in multiple changesets? (eg. one changeset per continent or country)  It would make it easier for the community to navigate around contributions.
Thanks.
lefuturiste (2023-08-28 19:44:41+00:00): "Chuir mé logainmneacha Gaeilge leis"  -> I added Irish place names
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-28 19:50:28+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/408579173

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
map per (2023-09-11 16:11:42+00:00): Hallo JakobMunichways,

dann stimmen hier die in OSM eingezeichneten Verkehrsschilder "Fußweg Radfahrer frei" auch nicht mehr oder?

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-28 20:01:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151605191
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151605190
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151634748
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151634640
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151634615
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151634595
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151634590
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151634586
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151634583
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151634584
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151634582
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151634521
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151634497
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151634471
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600389854
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356811171
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1186267562
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175974318
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1186267569
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229249795
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/360914661
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1099664313
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431217691
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1186294997
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1094968679
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1132979735
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1186309922
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229224396

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Wichrowe Wzgórze":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151634513
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151634514
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151634515
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151634516
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151634517
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151634518
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151634519

"Konstytucji 3 Maja":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151634576

"Większa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151634613

"Słoneczna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151634667

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
martinst (2024-07-07 04:45:58+00:00): Hallo, 
wieso hast Du bei Way 293587014 toll=yes zu toll=no geändert?
mychoeu (2024-07-07 07:50:55+00:00): Hallo, der Abschnitt bis zum Mauthäuschen kann ohne Maut befahren werden, daher die Änderung.
Maut gilt nur zwischen der Mautstation am Parkplatz und dem Walchensee/Einsidl
martinst (2024-07-07 15:07:39+00:00): Stimmt, ich hatte noch die alte Position vom Mauthäuschen im Kopf. 
Dann sollte toll=yes auch vom Way 49857938 entfernt werden, oder?
mychoeu (2024-07-07 15:21:30+00:00): Stimmt, das habe ich dann übersehen. Das Mauthäuschen node 2006294983. Kann man dann auch entfernen
mychoeu (2024-07-07 16:14:02+00:00): Habe es entsprechend angepasst.
martinst (2024-07-07 16:55:48+00:00): Danke. 
Was man noch tun könnte ist die toll=no und toll:bicycle=no entfernen, die sind ja dann überflüssig.
mueschel (2023-08-29 17:23:43+00:00): Hi.
please check the tags you added recently.  There are many streets with strange tags like "30 = 20".
MenKauRa (2023-08-29 18:15:24+00:00): thanks for the comments... it was my mistake... i already fixed it...
damianeue (2023-08-28 20:22:42+00:00): about the Alento bridge: aligned ONLY the start and the end nodes (for each way), fixed name and bridge:name - will finish to fix its geometry in my next edit
bxl-forever (2023-08-28 22:47:37+00:00): Hello,

I saw you requested a review of your changeset.  Here are some comments.

For a first, please try to write a more meaningful title upon uploading changes.  100% of what people do when mapping would qualify as "ajout de plusieurs éléments".  For this one, you could have said that you improved the shape of roads in the car park an created a missing connector between them.

I do not know this shopping mall but upon looking on different versions of aerial imagery, it looks like this path here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1202960145) has been drawn across parking spaces and across a hedge.  If there is a connector, it is maybe slightly more to the east.

For this one (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1202960145), highway=footway would probably be a better choice than highway=path, since it will be only for pedestrians, right,

Have a nice day.
IguanaPablo (2023-09-11 19:18:18+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta.
IguanaPablo (2023-11-01 17:46:47+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-10-24.
treestryder (2023-09-06 04:39:34+00:00): It looks like CyclOSM and Open Cycle Map render that proposed section well enough. Though, without looking closely at the map key, folks may think that trail really exists. Personally, I am in the "only map reality" camp. Maybe, the suggestion on the "proposed" key's wiki page to use "proposed: route=bicycle" would work better, as "this makes it clearer to database users that this route is not yet in existence."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed
That page also states, "
You are also encouraged to add the source for the plan with source=*. Please take care about copyright issues and don't copy from plans you're not entitled to do so.

Objects without clear evidence that there is some real active plan to construct it should be removed from data.
"

And, I doubt that is a true "cycleway". The only cycleway I know of in Michigan is a half mile long section on MSU's campus. Have a look at multi-use paths on the Michigan Wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan#Pedestrian_ways
In fact, many of our paths are signed for wheeled users to yield to foot traffic. Which would more accurately be highway=footway + bicycle=yes + segregated=no or highway=path + foot=designated + bicycle=yes + segregated=no
However, ignoring those signs, most have been mapped as highway=path + foot=designated + bicycle=designated + segregated=no
treestryder (2023-09-10 14:31:52+00:00): I started a project page for The Iron Belle. And made your bicycle route thee route.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/.../Michigan/Iron_Belle_Trail
englu (2023-08-29 07:51:54+00:00): Czy w okolicach Majdanu Nowego były jakieś oznaczenia czarnego szlaku pieszego? Teraz relacja jest przerwana.
magik1969 (2023-08-29 21:50:22+00:00): Z czarnym szlakiem w końcowym jego biegu (Majdan Nowy - Budziarze) jest taki problem, że nie jest oznakowany w widoczny sposób. Przejechałem w tym i zeszłym roku ok 80% tego wycinka i nie zauważyłem żadnego oznakowania szlaku. Szlak czasami wiedzie po drogach, które już nie istnieją a jest i przypadek, kiedy wiedzie prze zagrodzoną prywatną posesję! Prawdę mówiąc mam problem, co zrobić w takich przypadkach. Zazwyczaj zmieniam kategorię drogi na możliwie najniższą i zostawiam jak jest. Czuję jednak, że nie jest to rozwiązanie optymalne. Na północny wschód od ronda w Majdanie Nowym faktycznie wyciąłem fragment drogi ze szlakiem przerywając jego ciągłość. Wycięty fragment drogi nie istnieje w tak oczywisty sposób, iż uznałem że tak będzie lepiej. Jeżeli masz jakiś dobry pomysł, co robić w takich przypadkach to się podziel.
Jeżeli chodzi o pozostałą, większą część czarnego szlaku, na wschód od Majdanu Nowego to jechałem tylko jego mniejszymi fragmentami i tam oznakowania szlaku były widoczne. Może bez szału, ale jednak.
englu (2023-08-30 06:54:53+00:00): Dzięki za szczegółową odpowiedź. Jeśli chodzi o zarośnięte drogi czy ścieżki, to wydaje mi się, że jeśli jest tam szlak, to zestaw highway=path wraz z trail_visibility=bad lub trail_visibility=horrible jest w porządku. Oczywiście nie wpływa to na wyświetlanie takich ścieżek na mapie, więc nie jest to idealne rozwiązanie, ale na lepsze nie wpadłem.
Iron TUX (2023-08-28 21:24:49+00:00): Le cul-de-sace est délimité par une barrière en travers du chemin. Elle est cependant franchissable à pied ou à bicyclette. Je ne sais pas comment interdre les véhicules moteur de traverser tout en autorisant les piétons et cyclistes à pouvoir le faire.
Cette photo (https://photos.app.goo.gl/pXJjjRXjMb5SXhGq6)  permet de visualiser la situation.
A+
joel56dt (2023-08-29 17:10:37+00:00): Thanks for fixing this (and adding the explanation). I had previously misunderstood the guidelines for drawing intersections so I am sure there are several more like this. I have recently been working on improving intersection details in Vancouver so I hope to fix the rest of them when I see them.
keithonearth (2023-09-01 00:39:30+00:00): Thanks for working on the map and being receptive!
Đuro Jiří (2023-10-21 17:39:20+00:00): Ciao Latisana992,
per la seconda volta hai aggiunto divieto d'accesso sul questo parcheggio. Non si capisce perché. Questo parcheggio è aperto al pubblico. Io personalmente non ho mai visto questo parcheggio chiuso,mai. Ho rimosso divieto d'accesso, per la seconda volta.
Supaplex (2023-08-29 02:06:03+00:00): name of the restaurant?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140514091
danieldegroot2 (2023-08-28 21:54:08+00:00): (common, current official convention and shares etymology with similar place names);

Sources (use for reference only!)
- https://www.duchas.ie/en/cbes/4742029/4729573
- https://www.duchas.ie/en/cbes/4758583/4756555
- https://www.duchas.ie/en/cbes/4758583/4756572
- https://www.duchas.ie/en/cbes/4742029/4729546/4935406
- https://kilkennycoco.ie/eng/services/planning/buildin
- https://webapps.geohive.ie/mapviewer/index.html
- https://logainm.ie/
SomeoneElse (2023-08-28 22:16:57+00:00): and Dringhouses
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-28 22:00:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3134328442
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478319294

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
map per (2023-08-29 20:32:42+00:00): Hello Wheretogo-agency,

and welcome to OpenStreetMaps!

concerning review_requested:
You moved a cafe in Schwabing around (see https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#140514913). I fixed that.

Best regards
map per
map per (2023-08-29 20:27:37+00:00): Hello Wheretogo-agency,

concerning review_requested:
I mapped Logitex as an office (see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11154436059)

Best regards
map per
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-28 22:40:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151895991
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151895994
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151896000

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-28 23:20:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Osiedle Słoneczne":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151928721
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151928724
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151928727
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151928730

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mariotomo (2023-08-29 05:29:53+00:00): hola. el sitio que mencionas como fuente tiene: »© Benemérito Cuerpos de Bomberos de Panamá 2022. Derechos Reservados.«
mariotomo (2023-08-29 05:30:25+00:00): hola. el sitio que mencionas como fuente tiene: »© Benemérito Cuerpos de Bomberos de Panamá 2022. Derechos Reservados.«
mariotomo (2023-08-29 05:30:51+00:00): hola. el sitio que mencionas como fuente tiene: »© Benemérito Cuerpos de Bomberos de Panamá 2022. Derechos Reservados.«
mariotomo (2023-08-29 05:32:47+00:00): hola. el sitio que mencionas como fuente tiene: »© Benemérito Cuerpos de Bomberos de Panamá 2022. Derechos Reservados.«
mariotomo (2023-08-29 05:31:13+00:00): hola. el sitio que mencionas como fuente tiene: »© Benemérito Cuerpos de Bomberos de Panamá 2022. Derechos Reservados.«
Rodrigo Rega (2023-10-01 22:10:26+00:00): Boas, según as fotos de PNOA e Bing aquí non cuadra outro stop. Constache que realmente está?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140516037
Mixigodo (2023-10-02 08:48:56+00:00): Ola, Rodrigo! Pois reviseino porque pasei de noite por aí e lembro claramente que se me fixo raro facer ese STOP habendo outro ao lado. Logo de mirar no OSM, vin que non estaba mapeado e púxeno eu. Pero si que é certo que me fixo dubidar o feito de que no PNOA e no Bing non aparecese.

Porén, ante o teu comentario, pregunteille a unha amiga que fai esa ruta decote e confirmoume que, polo menos, o sinal vertical está fixo (lémbrase porque comentou non hai moito que a matogueira case cubre o sinal). Hame confirmar cando volva pasar se o sinal pintado no chan está tamén. Eu estarei atento tamén se me coincide volver pasar por aí.

Moitas grazas polo traballo de revisión!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140516037
Rodrigo Rega (2023-10-04 18:44:36+00:00): Boas, acabo de ver en "outras fotos" mais actuais que sí que hai o stop que engadiche. Gracias por atender a miña consulta. Unha aperta.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140516037
mariotomo (2023-08-29 05:31:27+00:00): hola. el sitio que mencionas como fuente tiene: »© Benemérito Cuerpos de Bomberos de Panamá 2022. Derechos Reservados.«
mariotomo (2023-08-29 05:31:39+00:00): hola. el sitio que mencionas como fuente tiene: »© Benemérito Cuerpos de Bomberos de Panamá 2022. Derechos Reservados.«
mariotomo (2023-08-29 05:31:54+00:00): hola. el sitio que mencionas como fuente tiene: »© Benemérito Cuerpos de Bomberos de Panamá 2022. Derechos Reservados.«
mariotomo (2023-08-29 05:32:04+00:00): hola. el sitio que mencionas como fuente tiene: »© Benemérito Cuerpos de Bomberos de Panamá 2022. Derechos Reservados.«
Robert Whittaker (2024-03-11 10:30:17+00:00): In this changeset, node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11151936875 was tagged with both emergency=defibrillator and waste=dog_excrement . Are both of these tags correct? (If there's a bin and an AED at the same place, I'd use two separate nodes.)
RaccoonFederation (2024-03-11 10:38:23+00:00): Thanks for pointing that out, it was a mistake with how I was using OSM Go
mariotomo (2023-08-29 05:32:15+00:00): hola. el sitio que mencionas como fuente tiene: »© Benemérito Cuerpos de Bomberos de Panamá 2022. Derechos Reservados.«
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-30 03:39:37+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140566944
archpdx (2023-08-29 02:50:59+00:00): Hi,
Just want to confirm whether this whole area is part of the building:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324866165
❤️‍🔥 (2023-09-05 04:46:06+00:00): Hi, the speed limit is not 99 km/h here...
watmildon (2023-08-31 06:41:32+00:00): Hello! There's a bit of a data issue with the MWAI NAD feed right now. If you happen to know the addr:city for these it would be good to get them patched up as "Unincorporated" isn't a real postal city. ha.

Just a heads up. I've posted about it here:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/esri-address-feed-update-has-some-issues/103132
xem0861 (2023-09-01 01:02:04+00:00): Thanks for letting me know, I got most of them fixed in changeset 140657584.
watmildon (2023-09-01 02:41:37+00:00): Happy to help! Hopefully they can get it patched up soon enough.
GeeMaps! (2024-09-15 05:09:21+00:00): Hi David, Notes near here https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4052410 & others to say this is a private road "past the grid" & listing a,b & c addresses. Do you remember where the grid is, or know about the addresses?
Davie Dean (2024-09-15 07:33:31+00:00): I'm not in the area anymore, unfortunately. I visited JMT Auto Electrical at the time (so it *was* there), but can't confirm the other notes. Is the cattle grid visible in the aerial imagery? I'd believe it was close to the front of the driveway, but I don't remember for sure.
Davie Dean (2024-09-15 07:35:06+00:00): This is his facebook page, which says 11563 but no C: https://www.facebook.com/p/JMT-Auto-Electrical-100095230900908/
GeeMaps! (2024-09-16 00:21:43+00:00): Thanks, David! Added the grid just past the firies as appears to be a dark shape on Mapbox. Also updated the addresses
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 06:41:30+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145277807
MxxCon (2023-08-31 02:00:06+00:00): Hello.
Please stop deleting POIs in NYC.
If a business closed, it should be marked as such using appropriate lifecycle prefix as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Or at the very least just delete the biz-specific tags but leave the address node.
Doing that preserves history of that object and allows that address to be searchable and routed to. If you just delete that node you destroy both of those things!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140518480
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 06:40:10+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145277772
Baloo Uriza (2023-08-29 14:41:17+00:00): You can probably leave the "APT " out of addr:unit and leave just the number as the value.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140519019
user_20109342 (2023-08-29 17:10:55+00:00): Sounds good, I can do that. Question before I get started, normally people search an apartment address with the word APT, will they still be searchable in navigation applications on the frontend if I remove APT and only keep the unit number?
Baloo Uriza (2023-08-30 01:16:40+00:00): That should be the case, as addr:unit is for any apartment/suite/office/space/trailer/locker/mailbox type situation.
pesec (2023-08-29 07:41:00+00:00): Добрый день.
Данным пакетом правок вы добавили шлагбаум с запретом для велосипедистов и разрешением для пешеходов, но никак не обозначили возможность проезда для транспорта. Исправьте пожалуйста
WoodWoseWulf (2023-08-29 03:33:32+00:00): Hello!

Thank you for fixing some of your past mapping changes. It's appreciated.

Note on the footway tag - the existing cycleway is already mapped as being designated for pedestrians. 

This is probably more accurate than marking the entire park as a footpath which can result is some weird rendering outcomes and isn't entirely accurate.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-31 05:13:27+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140616473
mariotomo (2023-08-29 18:52:07+00:00): hi. a hint from Panama, which you touched with this changeset: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
and 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
CoyKoi (2023-09-02 19:39:48+00:00): Hi kurahaupo, welcome to OSM and thanks for your contribution. I have reviewed your changeset and it looks great, thanks for updating the village and for your good changeset comment. Cheers
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140520653
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-02 09:22:07+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11152216675/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )