piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
旧加卷 (2026-03-12 04:57:43+00:00): Hi Yue Yixiang:
中国大陆境内的元素 name 值不得同时标注中英双语，更不应对英语部分添加括号。
英语部分请添加至 name:en 。
“在建”属于描述性用语，不是名称的一部分，必须从名称中删除，这是中国OpenStreetMap的常见错误。
"Still in construction"在正式场合用于直接描述状态有些生硬。
Hendrik Helsper (2026-02-12 18:15:42+00:00): Jetzt hast du den Bussonderfahrstreifen am Höfchen zum Fußweg gemacht. Ich hab das wieder korrigiert. Sei doch bitte in der Recherche ein bisschen gründlicher, bevor du mitten in der Innenstadt ganze Straßenzüge reklassifizierst.
I-76 (2026-02-14 21:16:02+00:00): Shot Tec LLC still has the layer=-1 tag, is that still correct or did that drag over from the previous location?

Also, Slices and Rolls still has the tag shop=vacant from previous changes. Be careful when moving or changing businesses that tags don't carry over and become outdated.
I-76 (2026-02-14 21:16:43+00:00): level=-1 not layer
mkopinsky (2026-02-15 00:27:31+00:00): Whoops, those are both valid points. Slices and Rolls is not vacant, and Shot Tec is no longer in a basement.
NeisBot (2026-02-12 06:21:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13545198677 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Financial services office"
---
Misalnya, versi teks yang lebih netral dan faktual bisa jadi: "Kantor jasa keuangan"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-21 05:34:05+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/178473273
notmyproblem1 (2026-02-13 18:50:43+00:00): che varie ... vuol dire?
Adam Dunn (2026-06-09 22:53:48+00:00): The opening hours entered are rather suspicious. Are you certain they are correct? I am doubtful they open that early in the morning.
NeisBot (2026-02-12 07:33:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13545246093 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Prototip üretim yeri"
---
Örneğin metnin daha tarafsız ve gerçek bir versiyonu şöyle olabilir: "Prototip üretim yeri"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-21 05:34:06+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178447822
evgenykatyshev (2026-02-12 07:38:41+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178440319
rskedgell (2026-02-12 10:18:49+00:00): (Review requested)

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. That looks fine to me, thanks for improving OSM.
Jordi MF (2026-02-12 16:33:27+00:00): Como se te ha dicho en el pasado, a tus cuentas anteriormente bloqueadas, la etiqueta de wikipedia=* debe de añadirse haciendo referencia al idioma local (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia). Y en esta zona, el catalán es la lengua propia según lo dictamina el Artículo 7 del Estatuto de Aragón (https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2007-8444) y la Ley 3/2013 (https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2013-6103).
Así que, por favor, una vez más, no uses de manera inadecuada la etiqueta wikipedia:xx=*.
Supaplex (2026-02-12 10:00:02+00:00): 感謝您貢獻開放街圖
不好意思，rest_area是指公路或高速公路的服務區或休息區，並非一般類型店家會用到的
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178442983
Dodko (2026-02-13 14:20:08+00:00): Parkovisko pri kolaudácii nedostáva adresu, tú dostávajú budovy.
m_fuhrmann (2026-02-12 09:13:52+00:00): @https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/flex16

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/flex16

Muss man hier an der Anbindung an die Frankfurter Straße irgendwas sicherstellen, dass man nicht aus dem Gegenverkehr nach links geroutet wird?
flex16 (2026-03-15 22:35:22+00:00): Yo, wenn da ne durchgezogene Linie ist, brauchen wir eine turn restriction.
m_fuhrmann (2026-03-17 08:14:30+00:00): Die hattest du ja schon gesetzt. Danke!
NeisBot (2026-02-12 09:21:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13545490141 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "美容整形クリニック"
---
例えば、あなたのテキストのより中立的で事実的なバージョンは、「美容整形クリニック」であることができます。
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-21 05:34:09+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178844200
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:52:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459260
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
ZioDragon (2026-02-17 05:33:43+00:00): Vui lòng đặt thẻ nút giao bằng ref thay vì name (vì trên thực tế nút giao thể hiện bằng chữ)
bxl-forever (2026-06-17 15:36:09+00:00): Hello,

About this building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1212561491/history

The name was already set as "St Gabriel's Parish House" in the name=* key.

You added "name:en=*", which is supposed to store translations… into English. You wrote "The Vicarage" there.

This is not a correct way to map names.

You might want to use alt_name=* to indicate an alternative name, or loc_name=* for a colloquial name given by locals.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-18 01:06:49+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184250206
eggie (2026-02-12 10:33:02+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.
Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. 
De format Weekdagen  en phone +31 heb ik aangepast.

MVG
eggie
Fan map 2 (2026-02-14 16:00:18+00:00): Wycofane w https://osm.org/changeset/178550064
Famlam (2026-04-24 19:51:35+00:00): Dit betrof een tijdelijke afsluiting van een paar weken. Dat soort afsluitingen zetten we in principe niet op OSM. Zo wel, gebruiken we *:conditional tags met daarin het datumbereik. Zo niet blijven dit soort foutjes nog jaren doorgaan.
Famlam (2026-04-24 19:52:15+00:00): doorgaan -> bestaan

Ik heb het teruggedraaid, de straat is weer gewoon open
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-16 23:54:00+00:00): DWG revert - bad naming

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184203584
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-16 23:55:50+00:00): The lake already has a name, so doesn't need the same loc_name. We also don't map pronunciations. CS has been reverted.
rarad74 (2026-02-12 09:59:21+00:00): Salut. te rog foloseste diacritice si pune comentarii normale. 
Multumesc.
eggie (2026-02-12 10:36:10+00:00): Hi Dirk   What do you mean with apartment the name=Alkmaar?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dapartment
Is this for rent for tourists?  Is the name really Alkmaar? 

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2026-02-12 14:22:06+00:00): Not verifiable under this name=Alkmaar
.. Removed
No additional information.
Gr eggie
NeisBot (2026-02-12 10:36:21+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (9 changesets) shows that 392 of your last 468 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23778086
MaskaevaMBx (2026-02-12 11:25:08+00:00): Fixed roads connectivity and geometry for better routing based on Esri World Imagery #mapbox_missing_roads
Norbert Dichter (2026-02-13 13:50:53+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178448028
Norbert Dichter (2026-02-13 13:51:07+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178448048
Trafford_Mapper (2026-02-13 09:01:49+00:00): Edit reverted, whilst you may have clinics here, this is a whole hospital with many other facilities and doctors. Removing the official hospital website and adding your own, as well as your own opening hours and personal email isn't helpful, and can lead to confusion for genuine patients of other doctors at this hospital.
rskedgell (2026-02-13 18:27:56+00:00): Mr Sotonye Tolofari would do well to read the GMC guidance: https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/using-social-media-as-a-medical-professional/using-social-media-as-a-medical-professional
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-13 04:02:44+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być formatu XX-XXX, gdzie X oznacza cyfrę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103645945

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bartgron (2026-02-13 18:39:55+00:00): Zestaw zmian jest nieprawidłowy i z beznadziejnym opisem. Został wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178517411
Pozdrawiam
LordGarySugar (2026-02-16 17:53:53+00:00): I've changed the cycling to highway=cycleway instead of highway=footway and removed the amenity=childcare nodes named 'Litter everywhere'.
I've also changed aerialway=zipwire to playground=zipwire.
Frans S (2026-02-14 11:38:30+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping.
Difficult to identify buildings. Mostly round huts, with a courtyard in front.
You regularly mapped just a rectangle (the yard) as a building, ignoring the round building next to it.
You also mapped complete fenced yards as a building.  I adjusted those mappings.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2026-02-14 11:26:55+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Rather complete and accurate mapped.
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key while selected.
Objects that show no shadow are not to be mapped. Not above ground level, no building.
Frans S (2026-02-12 16:33:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark.  Objects, showing both the shadow on the outside as well as on the inside are no buildings. Mostly fenced cattle yard.
Best regards and keep mapping
LordGarySugar (2026-02-16 17:50:12+00:00): I've reverted the changes two the two recreation grounds within the school areas - they were correct as-is
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 17:08:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178467695
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
Bartloh (2026-02-13 11:03:37+00:00): Super & Danke :-)
KennyDap (2026-02-12 16:03:30+00:00): You made a huge number of mistakes in these changes and broke the roads.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178464776
LuxuryCoop (2026-02-13 04:12:58+00:00): @bigoo
건물 하나에 사업체가 여러 개 있을 수 있으니 식당 같은 가게를 추가하실 때는 건물에 바로 정보를 넣기보다는 건물 안쪽에 새로 점을 찍으시고, 거기에다가 가게 정보를 넣어 주세요!

@KennyDap
Yes, they made the mistake of incorrectly deforming the shape of the following building or/and road:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/608671097
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/668645619
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/668645615

However, they simultaneously added a lot of POI information that would be difficult for non-locals to know, their information often appeared accurate. (actually, Ioften visited the area)

1. Rather than treating newcomers as if to say “we don't need you,” we should clearly explain to them what parts are incorrect and need correction.

2. Currently, most contributors to the Korea OSM focus on roads and buildings, with very few adding valuable POI information. We should welcome such people.
LuxuryCoop (2026-02-13 04:14:18+00:00): [Correction]
their information often appeared accurate.
→ the POIs seems to be accurate.
KennyDap (2026-02-13 04:55:02+00:00): @LuxuryCoop,
yep, u right.
bigoo (2026-02-13 05:21:23+00:00): My apologies, I didn't mean to break any roads or cause any issues.
KennyDap (2026-02-13 05:52:55+00:00): @bigoo,
As far as I can see, @LuxuryCoop has correctly implemented the changes you suggested:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178483621
So anyway, thank you for your participation.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-13 04:02:49+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13545813671

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2026-02-12 16:25:29+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You are a beginner mapper and thus have no experience in how to interpret the objects. Rather difficult in this area.
Some issues. Very large/irregular objects are mostly trees.
You  also mapped empty spots as buildings. Mostly sand-colored. These are yards.
Outside the fenced courtyards are mostly no buildings.
You overlooked rather much easy to identify round buildings.  (124 which I mapped).
Best regards and keep mapping
bartgron (2026-02-12 20:56:29+00:00): Zestaw zmian jest nieprawidłowy i został wycofany.
Pozdrawiam
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-01 01:32:29+00:00): Especially when mapping for a client, it is your responsibility as a paid professional to use OSM tags correctly. In particular, opening_hours=* doesn't even attempt to resemble the correct syntax, addr:street=* incorrectly includes abbreviations and doesn't match the actual road it's right next to, and unless used as part of the common name of the location (on signage, etc), legal signifies like "LLC" do not belong as part of the name=*.

Fixed in changeset 182055039

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182055039
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-01 01:39:09+00:00): (Also, it's payment:american_express=yes not payment:amex=yes , which you would have seen if you'd looked at what iD suggests)
gscholz (2026-02-20 07:41:10+00:00): Hi  UTCPetralia,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=14.10089&lat=37.80303&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Frans S (2026-02-12 15:38:41+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Sorry to say, but there are some issues with your mappings.
You mapped several yards as buildings. Try to identify the buildings and map only them.
Some buildings are oversized.
Best regards and keep mapping
Yukiro (2026-02-12 19:37:51+00:00): Żadna zmiana relacji, tylko błędne mapowanie, które nawet podbiega pod wandalizm.
dzamper (2026-02-12 23:33:13+00:00): A dlaczego taka zmiana „relacji” dróg miała by być konieczna skoro relacje restrykcji skrętów były już zmapowane?
Jak nie będzie sensownego uzasadnienia to bym raczej ten zestaw wycofał
stasiu512 (2026-02-13 11:11:54+00:00): Zestaw jest jak najbardziej do wycofania, tak jak i inne zmiany tego użytkownika, z wycofaniem jest problem bo ani osm revert ani JOSM nie daje sobie z tym rady. Najprawdopodobniej taka sytuacja jest spowodowana zmianami innego użytkownika który zmapował tu linie autobusowe
stasiu512 (2026-02-13 11:25:25+00:00): Udało mi się wycofać https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178498877
bartgron (2026-02-13 18:41:26+00:00): Poproszę o jakieś źródło tej nazwy, w przeciwnym razie zmiana zostanie wycofana
mavl (2026-02-14 06:16:02+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок не изменил покрытие, а удалил тег smoothness=very_horrible  
  
Подскажите, зачем?
bartgron (2026-02-12 20:46:27+00:00): Dałeś jednokierunkową w złą stronę, poprawię to
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:52:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459231
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:51:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459211
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
bartgron (2026-02-12 20:52:13+00:00): Zestaw zmian jest nieprawidłowy i został wycofany.
Pozdrawiam
geomaniX (2026-05-18 18:53:11+00:00): Moin! 
Du hast hier einen Briefkasten und eine Warenausgabe (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop=outpost?uselang=de) eingetragen.
Briefkästen haben keine Namen (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name) und bzgl. der Warenausgabe gibt es hier keinen Laden, zu dem die Warenausgabe gehören könnte. Was genau ist das für ein Laden?

VG
geomaniX
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:51:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459173
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:50:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459151
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:49:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459138
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
Fraxi (2026-02-12 13:04:36+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contributions!
I noticed you added a building(way/1476846125) where a furniture manufacture takes place. I'd like to pay attention to:
-outlines of the building. There are too many nodes along the outline. Whenever you draw a curved line(for example a road turn), then it is suitable to put more nodes along the curve. But in case you draw a straight road, the less nodes, the more upright and accurate road. You could draw a line by the option for a "way"(or keyboard shortcut "2").  Afterwards if the building outline is rectangular, you could press "Q" and as a result the corners of the drawn building will be straightened. I may redraw this building.
-As a description you mentioned "Custom Furniture Manufacturing". So this might be а  furniture workshop(in Bulgarian "мебелен цех") or a factory for production of furniture. And from https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1385745042932325&focus=photo&x=0.08839517701918216&y=0.4707548562080246&zoom=2&lat=41.8765791&lng=23.5200167&z=17 it looks more like an industrial building than a retail building. Do you agree? So, more suitable tags for this node's main feature would be craft=joiner or man_made=works + product=furniture. I understand you hardly enter in OSM. You may make yourself familiar with the main practices in OSM for marking main features here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features (there is also a lot of another useful information available on this wiki). 
I gonna make some corrections. Feel free to answer(in Bulgarian if you are a Bulgarian, too), to ask.
Fraxi (2026-02-12 13:52:15+00:00): I made some changes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/41.876932/23.519720 
You might have to refresh with ctrl+F5 to see the updates.
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:49:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459119
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:49:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459110
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
stillhart (2026-02-12 16:09:01+00:00): 🙏
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:49:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459095
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:48:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459082
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:48:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459074
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:48:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459058
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:47:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459049
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:47:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459006
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:46:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178458993
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:46:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178458970
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:45:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178458959
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:45:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178458942
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:27:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178458075
where the comment is: "🔄 Revert of unintended geometry change"
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-01 01:47:42+00:00): Especially when mapping for a client, it is your responsibility as a paid professional to use OSM tags correctly. In particular, addr:street=* incorrectly includes abbreviations and doesn't match other addresses in the area, as iD would have told you it's payment:american_express=* and payment:cheque=* not payment:amex=* and payment:checks=*,, service:vehicle:auto_repairs=* is not a known tag, it's website=* not Website=* (OSM tags are always lowercase), and phone=* is missing the country code.

Most of this was fixed for you by another mapper in changeset 13546019384 https://osm.org/node/13546019384 with the remaining bit (addr:street=*) fixed by me in changeset 182055184 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182055184
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:45:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178458925
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:44:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178458915
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"