piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
OHirschfield (2023-07-17 21:45:49+00:00): Either way the new point and the return of the area does not need to be looked at again and the matter is closed.
Cebderby (2023-07-17 22:13:25+00:00): No problem.  Yes, node or area are both ok for amenity, shop etc.  The only information you didn't have is that "area" is just a way that is closed into a loop to form the boundary, and the only object types (that can have key=value tags) stored in OSM are really node, way and relation.  So landuse areas, buildings etc are just stored as ways, although note you can also use relations (containing an outer and inner way loop(s)) to make areas with holes.
user_5359 (2023-07-18 09:47:01+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/way/618975524/history. You mixed some (misspelled) keys together.
TheBestIdea (2023-09-06 18:16:25+00:00): same issue here with incorrect contraflow left-side bike lanes on 7th Av
silversurfer83 (2023-07-17 19:20:12+00:00): Hi :)
sieht erstmal gut aus. Nur zu den oneways hätte ich noch ne Frage: hast du beachtet, dass die ways ja eine Richtung haben (im Bearbeitungsmodus anklicken. Dann siehst du Pfeile auf der Linie). Der oneway gilt für diese Richtung. Sollte ein Trail also up oder downhill gehen, sollten die Pfeile auch in die passende Richtung zeigen (way auswählen, rechtsklick, richtung umkehren).

Schönen Abend :)
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138631330
christophenglert (2023-07-17 19:50:02+00:00): öh ja, witzigerweise hatten sie irgendwie die korrekte Richtung; ich vermute es liegt daran, wie man anfängt die Linien zu ziehen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138631330
opendcc (2023-07-18 06:28:21+00:00): Hallo, heißt das Kreuz 'Steinkreuz' oder ist es aus Stein? Im erstenen Fall ist ein Beschreibung und nicht der Eigenname. Ebenso: steht da wirklich als Beschriftung 'nicht leserlich' drauf? Also besser den Tag weglassen und in der ergänzenden Beschreibung erwähnen, dann die Inschrift nicht lesbar ist.

Servus
Jürgen Hahn (2023-07-18 16:16:38+00:00): Ja, stimmt.
Danke für's Korrigieren.
Servus.
GerdP (2023-10-02 07:20:05+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Kennst Du building=digester für die runden Dinger mit grüner Folie oben drüber?
Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE%3ATag%3Abuilding%3Ddigester
Das andere runde Ding sieht für mich klar nach Tank aus (Gülle oder Wasser?), also man_made=storage_tank und - weil ziemlich hoch - building=storage_tank
Wiki: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Abuilding%3Dstorage_tank
Ich habe das mal entsprechend geändert: https://www.osm.org/changeset/142024479
stevea (2023-07-17 21:03:47+00:00): Actually, with a "triple-crossing) of two roads AND rail (with sidewalk-cycleway) there could very well be three layers.

Are you sure?  Maybe the Monterey Road and Coast Subdivision are different levels (which doesn't hurt, if true), in which case "there are three."

But this is not an at-grade crossing.  See?  It could be two or three and we're not sure now.
Black_Diamond (2023-07-17 22:00:04+00:00): I've driven under and over that bridge many times over the decades. Bernal goes over both Monterey and the railroad. Both Monterey and the railroad are at the same grade and are unfortunately too easy to cross by foot. You can also use Mapillary or StreetView to confirm that the Bernal Road bridge crosses all of it. The 2 bridges to the north and the next bridge to the south use the same layering scheme. Monterey, the sidewalk and railroad are at the same level and should be considered layer 0.

People have been known to cross this railroad and highway instead of the bridge at this area. In fact, Xander's Crossing to the north of here is named after a young child (Alexander Arriaga) that was killed by a train that was crossing the railroad in 2005 exactly where that bridge is located now. It was a tragic accident and all over the news. That area is pretty similar to this area.

There are not 3 layers here, and I'm sure of it.
stevea (2023-07-17 22:08:23+00:00): Thank you for your tight and touching reply.  I have seen it happen where someone will enter layer=2 (for the third layer that might be there because there may be a layer=1 that isn't clearly known).

We've now got this one straightened out, and clearly!

I remember when AA was killed there, indeed such a tragedy was big news.

Yes, layer=0 isn't normally used, it is simply "known" (and implicitly used as level ground).  I know Mapillary or StreetView can be used.  The more inputs, the better, the more certain the knowledge (at least one person, strongly asserting as reality), the better.

This is firmly nailed in place as-is.
silversurfer83 (2023-07-17 19:25:57+00:00): Wenn du dir sicher bist ist das in Ordnung den zu löschen. Bei solchen Eingriffen (Objekte löschen) wäre eine Quelle wie "survey" noch ganz nett. Aber wird schon passen, denke ich.
 Wenn ich mal dazu komme, hab ich auch noch was am Berg zu ändern 😅
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138632483
christophenglert (2023-07-17 19:52:27+00:00): um ganz ehrlich zu sein habe ich schon mehrfach darüber gegrübelt; aber ich hab heute nen video des trails gemacht; theoretisch hätte ich den Fußweg ja irgendwie mal sehen müssen; war aber nicht der Fall. Kann es lediglich morgen oder Mittwoch noch einmal probieren. Mal sehen wie das Wetter wird. Aber prinzipiell nehme ich an, dass es eine alte Holzrückschneise war, die sie jetzt teilweise zum Trail umgebaut haben. Ich prüf es nochmal ab!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138632483
christophenglert (2023-07-19 09:28:55+00:00): servus, kannst du den weg nochmal wieder herstellen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138632483
TheNet1996 (2023-07-17 19:37:06+00:00): Hallo,
...auch hier, informationen zu einer Reithalle findest du hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Driding_hall
Grüße
Mike
hasashin (2023-07-17 17:51:50+00:00): [EN] 
As future resident of this area I modified road to match reality. Added address Sadowa 9B as the building is already inhabited. Added building at the ond of the road - it's already built but not inhabited yet.
jdiddid (2023-07-27 14:56:23+00:00): Hi! I just surveyed this road yesterday, from mcclung road side, and from hoelocker drive side, and confirmed that it is still closed from both sides (and still under active construction). Just wanted to ask why you marked it as complete?
jdiddid (2023-08-04 12:13:35+00:00): Hello again, as of earlier this week, the road appears to be temporarily open, though the bike lane is still incomplete, I've updated the map to match the current status. So you can feel free to disregard my prior message. Thank you!
silversurfer83 (2023-07-17 19:29:34+00:00): hier hast du ein "noexit=yes" mitten in einen Weg gesetzt. Was genau ist hier und warum soll es nicht weitergehen? Eigentlich kommt das nur an Wegenden, wo es wirklich nicht weiter geht.
Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:noexit%3Dyes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138633203
christophenglert (2023-07-17 19:46:40+00:00): ist geändert
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138633203
silversurfer83 (2023-07-17 20:40:42+00:00): Gude
du hast hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2928099967) einen Fahrradständer über einige hundert Meter verschoben. Das ist eher ungewöhnlich. War das Absicht? Hier https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=138633210&relations=true kannst du es besser sehen.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138633210
emvee (2023-07-20 06:35:22+00:00): Good to fix phone number in general, one comment on a specific change.

I had a look at this change for this object, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1189992346

It is changing "+31 6 30898025; +31 6 55334879" to "+31 6 30898025;+31 6 55334879" so (only) removing the space after the ";"

I do not think that is needed or better.
cEvLGWiQ (2023-07-22 07:29:46+00:00): Hi, yeah this would be an edge case that I thought it wouldn't be a big deal.

With that said, if we're using the semicolon as a delimiter, I believe it would be weird (or dirty when talking in the context of data engineering) to have a leading or trailing white space in it. As we're essentially saying that one of the phone number would be " +31 6 30898025".

I've always understood OSM as a database of geographical data for apps (etc.), rather than a final frontend for the end user. So in this context, it would be up to the data user (apps) to decided how to format it.
cEvLGWiQ (2023-07-22 07:43:53+00:00): It also mentions here on how to map multiple phone number values https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#How_to_map

Though over here it also mentions that there is indeed an inconsistency going on in OSM (as always) when it comes to white space padding https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator
emvee (2023-07-23 19:53:11+00:00): Your edits typically adds spaces although that is according to ISO3166-2 although E.164 (without spaces) would also be fine. That is what made me question if removing the space after the ";" is logical.

I can live with it removed but I think the default should be not to remove it.
Bierphysik (2023-12-09 18:45:34+00:00): Hi. Ich glaube Du hats Dich hier vermappt. Du hast barrier=gate auf zwei Wege gesetzt und damit die highway=* weggemappt. Das stimmt aber nicht. Habe diesen Änderungssatz revidiert. Bitte tagge barrier=gate an den Stellen an denen das Tor ist. Das kommt nur auf eine einzelne node oder auf einen kurzen way an der Stelle an der sich die barrier=gate befindet.
emersonveenstra (2023-07-17 19:08:01+00:00): Hi,

What is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11051547342 supposed to be?
Prusaker (2023-08-29 16:50:15+00:00): А там точно вертолётная площадка? В списке посадочных площадок РБ Белоозёрск не значится.
Ilya Millerr (2023-09-05 07:37:36+00:00): ну, вообще да, не выглядит как прям действующая площадка, но по размерам она соответсует, и на моей памяти сюда вертолеты садились
Prusaker (2023-09-05 07:40:20+00:00): Принято :)
Спасибо за информацию.
ivanbranco (2023-07-18 13:18:36+00:00): Ciao Jacubovic,

come già richiesto: "Your changeset comments (“yty”, “gfg”, “fossi”, “vb”, “sr”…) do not adequately describe what you are doing."

In questo caso hai cancellato un nodo creato 3 anni fa (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7393221679/history) per sostituirlo con uno creato 19 ore fa (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11051551119/history). Così facendo però si perde la storia dell'elemento: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

In questo caso avresti dovuto cambiare il valore value e la posizione del nodo già esistente, invece di cancellarlo e ricrealo.

Buon mapping
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-17 18:20:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawną składnię. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

W adresie strony internetowej brakuje protokołu. Poprawny adres zaczyna się najczęściej od https:// lub http://.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218121491
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8515348

Dokumentacja adresów WWW (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl%3AKey%3Awebsite

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fizzie-DWG (2023-07-19 03:14:52+00:00): Salve UTENTE JS25F1 Jacubovic. Si prega di consultare https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7321. Graeme Fitzpatrick, Gruppo di lavoro sui dati OSMF.

Hello UTENTE JS25F1 Jacubovic. Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7321. Graeme Fitzpatrick, OSMF Data Working Group
gimodim (2023-07-17 21:02:28+00:00): The East Fork Chandalar River flows through the Alaskan wilderness. When comparing Spotify vs. Amazon Music, both offer vast music libraries and convenient streaming services, but their user interfaces and exclusive content can differ. Ultimately, the choice depends on individual preferences and device compatibility.
https://prodottiaudio.com/amazon-music-o-spotify/
marczoutendijk (2023-07-17 18:25:37+00:00): !El Camino del Turillo fue designado carril bici con un límite máximo de velocidad de 90 km/h! Se trata de un curioso error que ha pasado desapercibido durante 4 años. Hoy lo he vuelto a cambiar a higway=unclassified.
gimodim (2023-07-17 21:00:40+00:00): Apk olives can be found along the North Fork East Fork Chandalar River.

http://apkolives.com/
TheNet1996 (2023-07-17 19:35:02+00:00): Hallo Jikwn,
hier findest du informationen, wie man eine Reithalle (=Gebäude) korrekt mappt:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Driding_hall

Bitte prüfe nochmal deine Änderung. Danke & Grüße
Mike
Bolt026 (2024-08-13 08:32:46+00:00): Hi qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq,
We received reports of routing issues for this street Vana-Kalamaja (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4811714), which is now tagged as highway=pedestrian. Someone living in the area said that "From Kopli to Vana-Kalamaja road is closed. From Kotzebue to Vana-Kalamaja it is allowed for local people and transportation: there is a no entry street sign at this location: 59.4428124, 24.7382219 saying: Except for Kopli tn 2c, Vana-Kalamaja tn 1-8 and 10 residents and service transport". Would you please support with the best practice in adding the correct tags in order to fix this? Thank you in advance!
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-08-13 10:45:30+00:00): Hi, 
maybe I'll take a look at some point, need to check the sign.

But if the comment is correct, then the "best practice" is really hard to come up with.

I guess
motor_vehicle=private
and maybe
motor_vehicle:conditional=yes @ delivery

But I don't know about delivery. We don't have such thing as a "service transport" in our law and it may be hard to interpret if it means only street cleaning and maintenance, or cars for businesses there and if it includes things like Bolt Food. 

Maybe I'll ask transport department after I take a look at the sign.

But anyway, even if Bolt Food is allowed, then 
motor_vehicle:conditional=yes @ delivery
is quite a corner case and may not be recognized by whatever routing you are using.

Also, there might be a bollard from Kopli side, which should be added then, needs checking.
Bolt026 (2024-08-13 10:52:09+00:00): Hey! Thank you for your quick response! I received some pictures from the area. Let me find a way to share them with you.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-09-16 16:52:43+00:00): Hi, I've surveyed and added 

motor_vehicle=private
motor_vehicle:conditional=destination @ delivery

Also added a bollard on one side.
Bolt026 (2024-09-17 05:55:42+00:00): Hi,
Thank you so much for investigating this and for your support! The only issue that we still have is that our routing doesn’t use pedestrian road type, so the street will continue to be restricted.
Hufkratzer (2023-07-17 22:22:07+00:00): Hi,
was du da mit leisure=horse_riding getaggt hast (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129088283 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424487323), sieht eher aus wie Reitplätze. Reitplätze werden normalerweise mit leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian + evtl. surface=* getaggt, vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/143447359/history

In JOSM kann man dazu den Preset "Pferdesport" verwenden.
user_5359 (2023-08-08 06:15:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The tag building:levels=0 means that the building has no height above ground level. If you want to indicate that your shop is located on the ground floor, the tag level=0 is the correct tag.
willkmis (2023-07-19 15:19:39+00:00): Hi, I added this building based on survey, it's definitely a multi-story parking garage. You can see this from streetlevel imagery
VLD171 (2023-07-19 18:29:26+00:00): Thank you for pointing that out, so sorry for the confusion, I was only looking at it from the ground level side.  I'll replace that building tag.
Xvtn (2023-12-14 20:37:19+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contribution! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. Everything looks good to me, no complaints! Welcome to OSM!
impiaaa (2023-07-18 18:13:30+00:00): Anything that physically exists is valid to map, even if it's illegal or dangerous to traverse. In these cases they should be tagged with the "access" or "hazard" keys as appropriate. Otherwise someone will just add them back later.
Black_Diamond (2023-07-18 19:02:56+00:00): That's why I left the next segment below as is with its warnings and marked private access. That one to the south is wide enough for people to use without walking on the tracks. Though it's technically trespassing when used by the public. In this case, someone else also noticed that this path looks questionable, which I agreed with. I struggled to see the full path in the satellite imagery. It's very narrow in segments. So my basis of removing it is based on it actually existing. This isn't like the historical railroads where they have been completely removed (razed) with buildings on them. At least those existed at one point. This path seems more like wishful thinking based on the history than it being a real physical path.
Dodko (2023-09-17 09:04:34+00:00): use height in meters
rokeg (2023-09-18 07:16:24+00:00): Many thanks for the warning and the height correction. I know that the height is written in meters, but sometimes I forget to add a comma.
eggie (2023-07-17 20:11:11+00:00): Beste Wolter

Houd je gebied van je edits veel kleiner. Dus niet schuiven met de kaart svp. Dat geeft vaak schade door onbedoelde verschuivingen.
MVG
eggie
Jakka (2023-07-18 07:00:32+00:00): piscine voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=swimming_pool
leisure=swimming_pool
access=private
map per (2023-07-18 05:53:26+00:00): Concerning "review requested":
This edit looks goot, thanks!
Frans S (2023-07-22 13:36:19+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Many buildings do not appear to be rectangular, although they usually are. 
This is an optical distortion in the image. Just make these buildings square.
Best regards and keep mapping
Faheem Chui (2023-07-25 02:38:10+00:00): Thank you very much! I am glad that you are the first person could comment for me seriously on these. In order to guide me for improving my poor mapping skills . I will try to make rectangular for the following mappings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138637625
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-17 20:10:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190250999

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
hrhino (2023-07-18 16:55:35+00:00): Hi! Just so you know, you can use the Q key to make a building's edges into right angles (when appropriate). Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138637763
Stahlmann (2023-08-01 12:22:42+00:00): Einfach ein Lob für dieses Changeset! Ich war kürzlich selbst im Bereich Rotenkirchen / Burgruine Grubenhagen unterwegs und habe mir eine Hand voll Änderungen notiert. Überrascht stellte ich gerade fest: Alles schon da!
NGL-engel (2023-08-21 20:16:53+00:00): Hallo Stahlmann, vielen Dank für das Lob. Habe mich sehr gefreut :-)
damianeue (2023-07-17 20:23:23+00:00): offset was -3.46, -2.48
habi (2023-08-22 08:39:22+00:00): Ciao vmicho

The OSM community forum has been discussion (your) use of emoji in `direction_...`-Tags: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/should-emojis-be-used-in-tags/101823

According to https://taginfo.openstreetmap.ch/keys/direction_east and Overpass Turbo [1] it seems that it's mostly you using this tag, hence I'm commenting here.
In the discussion it has been suggested [2] that these 'guideposts' should probably be better tagged as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:information%3Droute_marker, since they are not 'proper' guideposts with 'text' giving directions, but 'only' marking where the hiking route proceeds.

Would you be OK with (me) retagging these guideposts to route markers?

Have a good day and greetings from Bern,
habi

[1]: http://overpass-turbo.osm.ch/?q=LyoKVGhpcyBoYcSGYmVlbiBnxI1lcmF0ZWQgYnkgdGhlIG92xJJwxIlzLXR1cmJvIHdpemFyZC7EgsSdxJ9yaWdpbmFsIHNlxLBjaMSsxIk6CsOiwoDCnCJkaXJlY3Rpb25fxYBzdCI9IsOwwp_CmsK2xIdpa8S6ZyLEj2xvYsS8xYjCnQoqLwpbb3V0OmpzxZNdW8WRbWXFssW0MjVdOwovL8SPxJTEnXIgxY5zdWx0cwooCiAgxoUgcXXEksSaxKNydCBmb3I6IMWIwpzFjMWOxZDFksWUxZZ0xZrFnMWexaDFom7FpMWrxpQgbm9kZVvFi8WNxY_FkcWTxZXEicWYxq_FncWfxITGs8WkxoLGt3dheca9xqjHgMarx4PFl8WZxZvHh8ayxaMix4zGlcWObMSUxqvHkca_xqrHgsatx5fGsMeIxaHHm8eMKcaDxpdwxLduxp_GjMaOxpAKxb7EmMa6ecaDPsaDx7lza2XEvXF0Ow&c=BM_A9Bo1bJ
[2]; https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/should-emojis-be-used-in-tags/101823/31
vmicho (2023-10-12 19:35:18+00:00): Hi. Will check that ... a bit later ;)
Anyway, "guide_type=intermediary" seems to be also usable for this.
For me as long as it also shows a direction that is appropriate :]
SomeoneElse (2023-08-09 19:01:22+00:00): I;m not convinced that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11051747216 is really a lock_gate - possibly some sort of flood barrier tag to go alongside https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172629852 would be best.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-17 20:40:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawną składnię. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

W adresie strony internetowej brakuje protokołu. Poprawny adres zaczyna się najczęściej od https:// lub http://.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11051699217

Dokumentacja adresów WWW (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl%3AKey%3Awebsite

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-18 09:53:57+00:00): wielkie dzięki za sprawdzenie i poprawienie!
stevea (2023-07-17 20:52:44+00:00): Nice!  I love your work, videos, updates!
gscholz (2023-07-22 07:31:34+00:00): Hi Eduarda14,
your recent changesets have created a bunch of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-52.60797&lat=-18.55371&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

As you may know, this kind of errors irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
AgusQui (2023-07-18 03:08:08+00:00): Hola Nahuel, tuve que revertir tu cambio debido a que lo que intestas agregar ya está mapeado: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8262699, y por otro lado el modo en que lo hiciste es incorrecto, los colectivos se mapean con relaciones, no con vías. Si quieres agregar otras líneas que faltan o paradas, te recomiendo que leas la wiki o que entres al chat de la comunidad para que te orientemos:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina/Transporte_p%C3%BAblico
https://t.me/osm_ar
Saludos!
hrhino (2023-07-18 01:23:50+00:00): Thank you! Welcome to OSM!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138640063
DiogoBaptista98 (2023-08-03 05:23:05+00:00): can you explain me the node 138640093 Praias em Omã and whats the source? Omã means the country Oman and that dont sounds correct.
Cyclono (2023-08-03 06:12:45+00:00): Hey, I sent you a message but you didn’t reply.

This Praia’s was a note, it’s not mine. Since there are no beaches here I thought it was information board
Kento Kei (2023-07-20 06:29:45+00:00): oh, nicely done
jcr83 (2023-07-30 20:22:13+00:00): Bonjour, je n'ai pas compris pourquoi vous avez remplacé la place de l'église par un multipolygone. Pouvez-vous m'expliquer SVP ?