piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
玩具老爹 (2026-04-30 05:11:18+00:00): 扭蛋｜盲盒｜一番賞
🏬武聖店🌟
不間斷推陳出新活動與視覺
款式超級多樣 每星期更新上架🤩🤩
每上新品即刻動態分享
開箱影片讓大家最快嚐鮮
提供線上代抽 7-11寄送服務
台南市中西區武聖路27巷23號（武聖夜市旁）
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-02 07:21:17+00:00): Removed SEO spam/nonsense tags from POI and fix phone number formatting in changeset 183531543

https://osm.org/changeset/183531543
eggie (2026-04-30 06:14:36+00:00): Hoi,

Dat smalle stuk heb ik afgesplitst en alleen daar de maxwidth 2 behouden. 
motor_vehicle=unknown verwijderd. Er is immers een parkeermogelijkheid.
MVG
eggie
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 09:41:41+00:00): Removed SEO spam tags and fixed malformed ones for A Team Home Services POI, split POI from building as it has a unit address, added road name and refined building outline w/new imagery in changeset 184128261

https://osm.org/changeset/184128261
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-06 02:59:00+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182274902
Ali Abbas mohamed (2026-06-18 14:40:25+00:00): Can i ask qustion?
ScottWalkerAU (2026-04-30 10:19:01+00:00): I have cleaned up these building imports in https://osmcha.org/changesets/182026382 - Care should be taken with Microsoft building imports, as they're often wildly inaccurate in shape or merging buildings together.
Ltrlg (2026-04-30 06:15:14+00:00): I planned to do this after discussion in changeset/181161036 but forgot. Thank you for doing it!
TheSwavu (2026-04-30 10:31:45+00:00): Hi, 

Is w110857090 really now one way heading north?

Thanks.
Alan Thomas (2026-04-30 11:01:53+00:00): Sorry, that was an error. Will fix now.
FroschForscher (2026-05-25 19:41:46+00:00): Hallo Grüner Baum,

node/1802189162 darf von Kunden mit Autos und Pferden genutzt werden, nicht jedoch mit dem Fahrrad oder zu Fuß. Ist das so korrekt?

FroschForscher
MarcoR (2026-04-30 08:48:30+00:00): Ciao e benvenuta/o su OSM!

Hai spostato un nodo in modo errato quindi tra poco lo riporto alla posizione precedente.

Buon mapping,
Marco.
MarcoR (2026-04-30 08:53:54+00:00): Ho cancellato l'ospedale inesistente che avevi creato su Lucca

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182022934
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-06 03:00:03+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182274922
fabiotofy (2026-04-30 07:57:43+00:00): Ciao, l'edificio esisteva già su OSM (vedasi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36215278), forse era da aggiornare le etichette di questo piuttosto che creare un altro oggetto sopra questo già esistente. Ciao ciao
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182017969
FajrAl (2026-05-03 07:37:58+00:00): Saran: nama "Jl." jangan disingkat, gunakan "Jalan"
KingVik (2026-07-24 22:38:01+00:00): Reverted Poor Quality AI Imported data during AfricaMap Cup
KingVik (2026-07-24 22:49:03+00:00): Reverted Poor Quality AI Imported data during AfricaMap Cup
KingVik (2026-07-23 23:00:05+00:00): Reverted Poor Quality AI Imported data during AfricaMap Cup
mcliquid (2026-04-30 09:51:23+00:00): Postalische Adressen wiederhergestellt.
KingVik (2026-07-24 22:54:20+00:00): Reverted Poor Quality AI Imported data during AfricaMap Cup
habi (2026-04-30 06:48:29+00:00): Also, kinda taking care of https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5271638
mcliquid (2026-04-30 09:50:52+00:00): Gebäudeumriss wiederhergestellt.
mcliquid (2026-04-30 09:48:44+00:00): Öffnungszeiten, Telefonnummer und Name laut WIki-Dokumentation korrigiert.
mcliquid (2026-04-30 09:47:08+00:00): building=yes wurde wieder ergänzt - POI separiert.
KingVik (2026-07-23 22:33:56+00:00): Reverted Poor Quality AI Imported data during AfricaMap Cup
KingVik (2026-07-23 22:32:24+00:00): Reverted Poor Quality AI Imported data during AfricaMap Cup
KingVik (2026-07-24 22:55:47+00:00): Reverted Poor Quality AI Imported data during AfricaMap Cup
Hufkratzer (2026-05-12 20:55:43+00:00): Hi,
you mapped 6 areas as horse riding centers ( leisure=horse_riding ) which do not look like horse riding centers:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1506576055
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1506576056
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1506576057
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1506576058
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1506576060
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1506576068
These areas look more like hotse riding arenas which should be tagged like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1204307109
see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian) , example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386888528#map=19/34.039850/-84.512594&layers=P
DividedFrame (2026-05-13 01:14:18+00:00): Thanks for letting me know!
adreamy (2026-05-02 13:13:55+00:00): 안녕하십니까?
OSM에 기여해 주셔서 고맙습니다.
ine63 님께서 밝힌 정보 출처는 사용에 있어 OSM과의 호환성이 확실하지 않아 나중에 문제가 될 여지가 많습니다.
보다 자세한 것은, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:첫_걸음#OSM_바깥의_데이터를_들여올_때_권리_문제 와 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:공공누리 를 참조해 주시고, 사용에 문제가 없다는 확실한 답변을 받지 못하는 경우에는 기여하신 데이터가 되돌려 지고 심한 경우 계정도 정지될 수 있다는 것을 말씀드립니다.
필요하신 경우 커뮤니티에서 충분한 소명을 하실 수 있습니다.
adreamy (2026-05-02 13:43:13+00:00): 아울러 이전 작업 역시도 충분히 설명되거나 소명되지 않았기 때문에 상당부분 되돌려 졌다는 말씀을 드립니다.
부디 (좀 번거로우시겠지만)OSM에서 정한 절차를 따라 주시거나 지역 커뮤니티와 소통해 주시기를 바랍니다.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-06 03:01:11+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182274934
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-06 03:03:40+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20245
eggie (2026-04-30 07:56:30+00:00): Willkommen zu OSM,

Die Slufter steht schon auf der Karte.
Jetzt dreidoppelt.
Dat Naturschutzgebiet Duinen van Texel steht auch schon auf der Karte.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2026-04-30 08:06:21+00:00): Die Knoten mit nature_reserve habe ich gelöscht. Das gehört jedenfalls nicht auf einen Knoten.
De Slufter gehört zu einem  grosseren Nature_reserve. Das steht schon auf der Karte. 
Grüss,
eggie
Max-Kritic (2026-05-12 14:22:42+00:00): La relation Bus 5a ne marche plus. Attention
Max-Kritic (2026-05-12 14:23:49+00:00): La Relation : Bus Némo 3 : Promenade → Centre Commercial Sud (6077728) aussi ne marche plus
FajrAl (2026-04-30 14:28:30+00:00): Mohon gunakan tag/label yang benar.
MappingMore (2026-05-04 05:21:25+00:00): Revert of 181901385
eggie (2026-04-30 08:12:02+00:00): Hoi.
review_requested 	yes

Niks mis mee.
MVG
eggie
GeorgeKaplan (2026-04-30 08:56:50+00:00): Bonjour, à quoi correspond l'objet https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13779638602#map=19/47.659839/-2.076091&layers=N ? Doublon de la maison des associations dans le bâtiment au sud ouest ?
fndoder (2026-04-30 17:29:28+00:00): В названии магазина должно быть только название, без лишних ключевых слов для поиска. Я поправил.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 11:17:30+00:00): Hi Golgistein,

Thanks for contributing to the map. However, this is unfortunately not how you indicate a buisness is closed on OSM; `closed` is not a valid value for opening_hours=* and status=* is a deprecated tag, with `closed` not even being a valid value for it. Instead, the correct way to handle this is with Lifecycle Prefixes (or there are a couple other possibilities); see https://osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

I switched to using the correct tags for a closed business POI and removed incorrect ones in changeset 184348768 , as well as fixed a couple other issues.

https://osm.org/changeset/184348768

Happy mapping.
KingVik (2026-07-23 22:30:58+00:00): Reverted Poor Quality AI Imported data during AfricaMap Cup
KingVik (2026-07-23 22:36:12+00:00): Reverted Poor Quality AI Imported data during AfricaMap Cup
KingVik (2026-07-23 22:31:10+00:00): Reverted Poor Quality AI Imported data during AfricaMap Cup
joost schouppe (2026-04-30 08:15:21+00:00): To be clear: in my opinion these aren't public_transport or railway=station at all, as I wouldn't consider these to be "in service"
Glassman (2026-04-30 16:12:36+00:00): I find it hard to believe there is a shop in the middle of the forest with no roads around. I'm going to revert this edit. I'll send  you more infomation on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182022045
Yuri Matias (2026-05-01 00:04:46+00:00): I understand the access=private tag, but the highway should be service. It's just some buildings' parking area
MountPelion (2026-05-04 04:18:44+00:00): Hi Yuri Matias,
I used highway=residential as these highways lead to residential units within an apartment complex. I can see the argument for service as well and can defer to your edits if you change this.
mavl (2026-06-07 06:01:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183764451, 183764460, 183764431, 183764453, 183764448, 183764459, 183764455 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20768].
eggie (2026-04-30 08:57:58+00:00): Willkommen zu OSM.
Herzlich dank.
gr eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-01 05:14:41+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227963520

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Piskvor (2026-04-30 10:30:09+00:00): Zdravím, tohle se mi nezdá. Pokud je stanice uzavřená, měla by být takto označena v datech, právě s použitím toho lifecycle prefixu.

Takto je stanice v mapě/datech vyznačena jako otevřená (ani access nevidím), zatímco v note je textově zmíněno uzavření. To je podle mě trolltag - ne každý konzument OSM dat je osoba, která se podívá na note.

Podle mě by uzavřená stanice neměla být ani v relaci; obdobně tagy. (Viz v poslední době Pankrác a Českomoravská: do otevřeného stavu se vrátily s otevřením OTG)
adamos (2026-04-30 11:13:21+00:00): Zdravím, prefix disused: zase zlobí v relacích a checkery, napře. geofabrik to vyhodnotí jako chybu. Podle mého chápání je disused určeni pro prvky zrušené nebo zavřené na neurčito, např. výrobní haly, obchody apod. V tomto případě se jedná jen o rekonstrukci, i když delšího charakteru
Piskvor (2026-04-30 12:52:59+00:00): To už je maličko tagování pro renderer (nebo validátor, prostě aby ten jeden datový konzument vypadal hezky).

Ano, stěžuje si oprávněně, že to není validní stanice. A stěžuje si na to zcela v souladu s realitou, není to (momentálně) stanice. To je podle mě v pořádku. 

Jinak prefix disused: "nepoužívané - aktuálně se nepoužívá, ale lze snadno obnovit". Tam je celkem jedno, jestli je v plánu budoucí obnovení (na což taky máme tag opening_date) - je to zavřený administrativním rozhodnutím, ale dalo by se to snadno zprovoznit.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:P%C5%99edpona_%C5%BEivotn%C3%ADho_cyklu

Rozhodně to teď není z hlediska pasažéra stanice a nemá smysl ji tak značit, protože ji pak budou lidi marně hledat ("mám to je dvěma stanicím podobně daleko, aha, ta co jsem zvolil je zavřená, měl jsem číst note???")
adamos (2026-04-30 13:15:31+00:00): "ale dalo by se to snadno zprovoznit" ¨myslím že neplatí, tomu zprovoznění předchází několikaměsíční rekonstrukce. Ale myslím, že sio rozumíme. Vrátil jsem Disused: a zároveň jsem stanici vyhodil z relace, to odpovídá nejvíc současnému stavu.
Piskvor (2026-04-30 13:22:02+00:00): "Snadno" ve srovnání třeba s jižní přístupovou štolou do stanice Petřiny, která je vyloženě razed: a bylo by fakticky třeba znovu provést stavební práce, aby znovu vznikla :)

Děkuji.
aboc (2026-04-30 17:15:17+00:00): Il 15 sta dal lato opposto della strada, che cosa viene noleggiato?
tettnanghlgr (2026-04-30 09:11:00+00:00): Der Name ist ausgeschildert, vielen Dank dafür
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-03 07:09:10+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182024946
KingVik (2026-07-24 22:53:27+00:00): Reverted Poor Quality AI Imported data during AfricaMap Cup
KingVik (2026-07-24 22:57:07+00:00): Reverted Poor Quality AI Imported data during AfricaMap Cup
KingVik (2026-07-24 22:51:17+00:00): Reverted Poor Quality AI Imported data during AfricaMap Cup
KingVik (2026-07-24 22:35:29+00:00): Reverted Poor Quality AI Imported data during AfricaMap Cup
mcliquid (2026-04-30 09:46:31+00:00): Vandalismus revertiert.
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-03 07:13:52+00:00): Danke für's Reverten @mcliquid

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182024946
mcliquid (2026-04-30 09:46:15+00:00): Vandalismus revertiert.
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-03 07:12:54+00:00): User has been blocked https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20223
SomeoneElse (2026-05-03 15:32:11+00:00): Hello,
The route of NCN9 looks a bit confused here (and has done for a while): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1399870#map=15/54.42631/-6.43496 .  Do you happen to know where it actually goes?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2026-05-03 15:49:05+00:00): Ah - just spotted the EV1 here.  I guess that that is correct for the NCN9 also?
therealzakie (2026-05-04 21:49:10+00:00): You mean connecting Lurgan and Lisburn? Because I do not know sadly
SomeoneElse (2026-05-04 22:22:21+00:00): Ah - never mind.  Someone will fill in the gap, I'm sure.
StijnSpijker (2026-04-30 09:24:48+00:00): Owh, have to add there was an extra "under" sign that allowed destination traffic.
eggie (2026-04-30 10:01:38+00:00): Dag Stijn,
Bij routers die het ondersteunen zou het moeten werken. 
Wel kan er nog moped=yes  en mofa=yes getagd worden. Die zie OSM als motorvoertuigen. 
MVG
eggie
StijnSpijker (2026-04-30 10:05:39+00:00): Dank Eggie, gedaan!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182025898
eggie (2026-04-30 10:08:59+00:00): Er staat nog wel een note open op de kaart van een medemapper.
Groet,
eggie
ika-chan! (2026-04-30 21:40:09+00:00): "Mini updates" is not enough to explain marking the Kalabaka–Grevena part of the A3 motorway as "complete" with access=no, even though it is not open yet, as well as reclassifying a service road as "trunk" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1419050123, it should be highway=tertiary). Please use more descriptive changeset comments.
Jordi MF (2026-04-30 15:37:19+00:00): ¿Puedes ofrecer la fuente por la que existe la denominación "Yenca" en castellano para esta partida? No aportas ninguna fuente y tanto el IGN como el Catastro denominan esta patida como "Llenca".
Jordi MF (2026-04-30 15:59:02+00:00): Por otra parte, ¿puedes ofrecer la fuente de la denominación en castellano disinta a "Pena-roja" y que has añadido como "Peña Roja"?
ika-chan! (2026-04-30 21:46:44+00:00): Hello, I can tell you that the service road is not trunk, and the EO6 national road will not be rerouted via that road.
MappingMore (2026-04-30 15:37:06+00:00): Partially Revert of 181967313
Densher13 (2026-05-05 11:38:13+00:00): Hello, MappingMore! I appreciate your adding extra details to my comment. Kind regards, Dzianis.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182025001
GiovanniPen (2026-04-30 10:18:52+00:00): dont forget to comment (describe) your changeset before publishing :)
bxl-forever (2026-04-30 10:14:11+00:00): Hello.
Please do not trace buildings from aerial images!!!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Buildings
Jordi MF (2026-04-30 15:57:09+00:00): ¿Puedes ofrecer la fuente por la que existe la denominación "Río Noguera Ribagorzana" en castellano para este río? No aportas ninguna fuente y, además, la denomianción "Noguera" es un término designativo fluvial que no se suele acompañar del genérico "río".
CoryS89 (2026-04-30 14:00:21+00:00): Those were all service roads. I changed them back, you had incorrectly made them residential roads. Please be more accurate with your edits. Please read the documentation if things aren't clear enough. Please ask for help from other users if you need help. Fixing your errors is not how I want to spend my day. Thanks.
eggie (2026-04-30 10:35:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-04-30 14:26:25+00:00): This is the fourth time you've added these roads to the OSM database, resulting in numerous overlapping ways. Please fix them!
subham_lyft (2026-05-03 16:22:11+00:00): Hi Flap Slimy Outward,
My name is Shubham and I’m Ankit’s teammate. We are mappers on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for letting me know about the duplicate entries. I was in the process of adding a way when a technical glitch on our side caused it to be captured multiple times in separate changesets. I’ve removed the duplicate entries in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182047056#map=19/35.968297/-114.857954&layers=N)
 I sincerely apologize for the oversight and will be more careful with my future mapping changesets.

Regards,
Shubham
eggie (2026-04-30 10:38:28+00:00): Dag Dimitry,

Wat is de status van dit fietspad?
In dat geval zou het een G12a fietspad zijn.
Dus 
moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a

en geen G11

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-30 10:43:31+00:00): Volgens het verkeersborden bestand niet voor moped
https://wegkenmerken.ndw.nu/kaart?kaartlagen=SPEED_LIMIT,TRAFFIC_SIGN,BGT&maxsnelheidfilter=1f5451a0.________Dw&zichtbaar-gebied=5.0723,52.08142,5.0778,52.0832&verkeersbordfilter=47f8f896._____________________________________________98
eggie (2026-04-30 10:51:44+00:00): Ah  .. wijziging .. Dan zal het kloppen. Ik maak er een G12a fietspad van. Of is het een G11 met een onderbord 'uitgezonderd bromfietsen?'
DimitryB (2026-04-30 10:57:38+00:00): Dag Eggie,

Op de ndw kaart staat inderdaad nog een G11 bord. Wie kan dat wijzigen? Ik reed er gister langs en er staat nu een G12a bord.
eggie (2026-04-30 11:04:07+00:00): In osm is het nu een G12a.
Wijziging gaat automatisch na een schouw.
Dat doet de wegbeheerder periodiek. Meestal de gemeente.
Je zou het dus door kunnen geven aan de Gemeente. Dat kan vaak via een fixapp.
DimitryB (2026-04-30 13:02:25+00:00): Ter verificatie nog even op Mapillary gekeken en een foto gevonden van de huidige situatie: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=609866438610896

Hierop is links het bord de ene kant op te zien. Aankomend vanaf de andere kant zijn helaas geen recente foto's.
eggie (2026-04-30 13:08:55+00:00): Up to you..😀 Dit is nog 2025, maar ik zie ook 2022.
eggie (2026-04-30 10:45:31+00:00): Maar hier staan de G12a fietspaden op moped=no?

Hoe gaat dan dat brommerverkeer?
MVG
eggie
DimitryB (2026-04-30 10:56:25+00:00): Dag Eggie,

Dit zijn aan- en afvoerwegen richting de snelweg. Richting de snelweg staat een C15 bord.

Bromverkeer kan hier dus niet heen. Richting de snelweg is het wel mogelijk om via het G12a fietspad 4271192 te rijden. Je komt daarmee natuurlijk niet daadwerkelijk bij de snelweg uit.
eggie (2026-04-30 11:00:50+00:00): Oke.. maar zijn de fietspaden wel getagd als NL:G12a?
Meende een G11 te zien. Kijk nu op mn mobiel.
DimitryB (2026-04-30 11:53:20+00:00): De situatie is hier wat lastig en ik moet zeggen dat het voor mij ook niet volledig duidelijk was wat wel en niet mocht. 

Vanaf de kant van fietspad 4271192 is het niet helemaal duidelijk. In ieder geval hangt er aan verkeerslicht 7770994463 een G11 bord, terwijl die niet bij 6960841730 hangt. Ik denk dus dat je op dit stuk nog kan rijden met de bromfiets om weer bij het autoverkeer in te voegen. Zeker weten doe ik dat overigens niet.

Bromfietsen die vanaf Utrecht komen kunnen via weg 844862486 bij het kruispunt komen, en dan links of rechts afslaan (of doorgaan via het bromfietspad 4271192).

De wijziging die ik heb gemaakt hier gaat over de brug 213215881 en de afvoerroute vanaf de snelweg. Hier mag je sowieso niet rijden op een bromfiets.

Mocht het helpen kan ik eventueel foto's maken bij het kruispunt om de situatie te verduidelijken.
eggie (2026-04-30 12:12:06+00:00): Nou... de wegbeheerder maakt ook volop fouten. Het gaat vaak al mis bij de bordenplaatsers.
Soms kun je het oplossen met moped:forward=yes of no moped:backward=....
Meestal is het een bebordingsfout.
Dan neem ik gewoon het gunstigste voor de tweewieler.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-30 13:53:17+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

IMHO something went wrong here.
Your renamed an entire landuse=* area ...

Best regards.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-01 00:47:44+00:00): NB, it's a SEO spammer
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-01 13:15:45+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182053101
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-01 16:09:20+00:00): Thanks @pitscheplatsch !
MappingMore (2026-05-01 02:19:34+00:00): Revert of 181934386
Aya Samir (2026-05-04 08:37:49+00:00): Hello MappingMore;
Thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. Could you please clarify?
Aya
trigpoint (2026-05-03 12:21:28+00:00): Hello
These changesets have made pedestrian routing worse.
The pavement is only separated from the road by kerbs and a pedestrian will just cross the road, after following the normal rules. They should not be sent on a long diversion to a crossing. Especially where there are none in the real world. 
Have you actually visited Tremadog and surveyed  these crossings? What is the source of these crossings? 
Because I can't spot them. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=241065118038134

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2026-05-03 12:24:13+00:00): No pedestrian actually follow this route to get from the pub to the Spar https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=52.939181%2C-4.141642%3B52.939257%2C-4.141277#map=19/52.938975/-4.141400
North14 (2026-05-03 12:52:08+00:00): Hi Phil, pedestrian ways separated or defined by the road parameters is a bigger discussion.  There are good arguments on either side. I am a strong believer that pedestrian ways should by separated to allow more detailed route planning for pedestrians. A key part of this separation is that road crossings are shown, either formal ones (which are markt) as well as informal ones (mostly seen in my eddings). 
PS: I was motivated for my map changes as I spend some days in Tremadog about a week ago.
PPS: Most of the cities in central Europe as well as the bigger cities in UK apply the separation approach as well as the positioning of the informal crossings at a road crossing, as this is the point where the mayority of the pedestrians would cross a road.
North14 (2026-05-03 13:01:53+00:00): Hi trigpoint, you are right. I added an informal crossing to allow the direct way.
stasiu512 (2026-04-30 14:37:13+00:00): Cześć, jak najbardziej popieram motorway od znaku jednak skąd tutaj trunk?
Szymson (2026-05-05 14:43:17+00:00): Sugerujesz że lepsze byłoby tutaj primary?
stasiu512 (2026-05-05 15:04:48+00:00): Na pewno poprawniejsze jeśli patrzymy na przegłosowanie kryterium wg ważności drogi dla trunk. Przykładowo tutaj https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/623047849 motorway przechodzi w secondary i jest to jak najbardziej poprawne. trunk powinien tworzyć spójną sieć dróg, a tutaj kończą się na losowych skrzyżowaniach gdzie droga nie traci ogromnie na znaczeniu.
Szymson (2026-05-05 16:02:06+00:00): Poprawiłem na primary:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182256753
stasiu512 (2026-05-04 14:06:09+00:00): Tutaj podobna sytuacja jak przy węźle Wielki Kack, dlaczego trunk jeśli wygrało kryterium gdzie mapujemy trunk wg ważności a nie jakości drogi?
Szymson (2026-05-05 16:03:43+00:00): Przywróciłem poprzednią kategorię:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182256808
mavl (2026-06-07 06:02:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183764451, 183764460, 183764431, 183764453, 183764448, 183764459, 183764455 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20768].
eggie (2026-04-30 11:22:57+00:00): Comment moet zijn weg gesplitst tbv afslagbeperkingen
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-30 13:56:18+00:00): Hi JEANNELI, welcome to OSM.

You created several duplicate buildings here.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1506803638
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1506803754

Best regards.