piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Sunset_Sakura (2025-08-01 09:42:29+00:00): I'm curious how long it took you to add all the refs? 
I've also never heard of Level0, seems like it could be useful/
❤️‍🔥 (2025-08-02 03:55:04+00:00): hey, this was all automated, since we have permission to use their data (https://osm.wiki/Contributors#New_Zealand ). So it took about 5minutes to run the script and double check the result. 

if you know any programming languages like Python or JavaScript, Level0 is an easy way to upload the results from your own script
Sunset_Sakura (2025-08-07 06:48:31+00:00): thanks, this is why I never bothered to try do it manually :)
micheleOSM3 (2026-07-04 09:06:51+00:00): Ciao Alessandro. Ho ripristinato il tag name corretto, dato che le quattro varianti linguistiche erano (e sono) già mappate correttamente nei rispettivi tag ISO dedicati (name:fur, name:sl, name:de).

Capisco lo spirito del progetto con ARLeF/NPLD, ma duplicare i toponimi accumulandoli nel tag name principale separati da slash viola le linee guida fondamentali di OpenStreetMap (vedi pagine Wiki Key:name e Names in multilingual areas).

Il tag name deve contenere esclusivamente il toponimo locale primario basato sulla segnaletica fisica presente sul posto (principio del Ground Truth). Inserire stringhe multilingua composite nel tag principale compromette il rendering della mappa ed è considerata una bad practice, specialmente quando i dati linguistici sono già presenti e strutturati nei tag corretti.

Ti invito a non ripetere questo tipo di inserimenti cumulativi e a utilizzare esclusivamente i tag di localizzazione linguistica per dare visibilità alle minoranze. Grazie per la collaborazione e buon mapping.
seewäldler (2025-07-15 15:50:44+00:00): Danke, im Vorbeifahren hatte ich, erst als ich schon um die Kurve war, die Halle registriert, dann aber keine Zeit mehr noch eine Runde rückwärts zu fahren um mir das genau anzuschauen.
swup0 (2025-07-15 13:15:34+00:00): Accidentally submitted with incorrect description.

Adjust hiking trail, add safety_rope and cliff.

Source: local knowledge, aerial imagery
NeisBot (2025-07-15 13:21:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
Creekside Smiles Pediatric Dentistry (2025-07-15 14:17:11+00:00): Updated. Please check and confirm if it looks good for you now. Thanks.
NeisReview (2025-07-18 06:01:24+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/169090435
Pikse (2025-10-07 13:38:35+00:00): Yet again, please don't manipulate place names for specific languages without consulting sources in these particular languages. "Volmari" was provided as alternative name ("alt_name:et") with a reason here. This name variant exists but it isn't common in modern Estonian, or rather is used only in historical context (see https://arhiiv.eki.ee/dict/qs/index.cgi?Q=valmiera&F=M). Hence it shouldn't be provided as the primary Estonian-language name.

Earlier we already had the same problem with Mazsalaca name: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68284694

Likely your changes to Polish name are unwanted as well here. Name "Wolmar", as per Polish Wikipedia, was in use until 2017. So "old_name:pl" tag probably was used with a reason.
Pikse (2025-10-07 13:40:59+00:00): Correction: "Wolmar" was in use until 1917 (not 2017), as per Polish Wikipedia.
Leo Slager (2025-07-16 10:10:42+00:00): Dag Jos,

review:
Let wel op dat er een verschil is tussen het privé eigendom van een weg en de toegangsrechten.

Het privé eigendom van een weg brengen we niet in kaart.

Als er geen verbodsbord of een afsluiting is, dan is de weg gewoon toegankelijk.

Zo kan een "eigen weg" van Defensie gewoon toegankelijk zijn voor alle verkeer.

access=private dus alleen gebruiken als de toegang verboden is.
Jos Hebing (2025-07-16 11:11:28+00:00): Hoi Leo,

Dank voor je review. Wellicht moet dan niet de classificatie 'voetpad' zijn maar 'toegangsweg'? Deze paden zijn namelijk bedoelt om toegang tot het pand te verkrijgen en niet als 'verkeersruimte'
Leo Slager (2025-07-17 10:38:55+00:00): Een highway=service alleen gebruiken als de weg ook geschikt is voor motorvoertuigen met 4 (of meer) wielen.

En als het er uitziet als een voetpad en er lopen alleen voetgangers of er staat een verkeersbord G7 dan is het een highway=footway..
Lostmonkey (2026-04-24 18:58:32+00:00): Ved du om stierne (mtb?) i Urhøje plantage (delvist) følger de skovveje, der kan skimtes på luftfoto og ses på terrænskygge?
kmpoppe (2025-12-23 19:08:42+00:00): Hallo VBNEchtzeit!

Ich habe den von euch angelegten Knoten entfernt und mit dem an der "echten" Position von Hampi's Stop Shop verbunden (und den Verkauf von Tickets mit aufgenommen).

Seid ihr bitte so nett und achtet bei der Eintragung eurer Daten darauf, dass Verkaufsstellen nicht doppelt angelegt werden, das wieder zusammenzuführen kann, je länger das unentdeckt bleibt, schwierig werden.

Ihr bekommt gleich noch eine DM von mir.

Gruß

Kai     
OSMF DataWorkingGroup (DWG)
habi (2025-07-15 13:53:26+00:00): https://qa.poole.ch/addresses/GWR/351_all.osm.zip und https://qa.poole.ch/addresses/ch/missing/351.geojson für die GWR-Daten.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-15 14:00:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13001900595

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Andrew Chadwick (2025-07-15 15:39:12+00:00): Probably a good idea. It's the ref that appears on route maps, and the name's almost internal. Plus, it sorts better in lists :)

Maybe it's better capitalised as "Bus Airline REF: Wherever → Somewhere Else" though?

I think Wikipedia would probably capitalise it as "The Airline" or just "Airline" if they had a page for it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Trademarks. They suggest looking at independent texts to gather consensus for lowercase brands. Looking around, the Oxford Mail doesn't include the definite article when talking about the route: https://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/19302677.oxford-bus-companys-airline-service-steps-frequency-travellers/
gmar5 (2025-07-15 15:48:18+00:00): I have always seen it referred to with the article.

As for capitalisation, I capitalised the first word taking the two as a unit "The airline", but now I also see that sometimes they write "The Airline" on some of their pages and social media, so I'd be fine with that.
felipeeugenio (2025-07-15 15:03:08+00:00): Hola. Por favor no pegar los parques y edificios a los caminos. Ya los despegué todos.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168967374
Yair Gallardo (2025-07-15 15:09:44+00:00): Hola
Muchas gracias, tendré mas cuidado en en mis próximas ediciones.

Buen día.
felipeeugenio (2025-07-15 15:19:13+00:00): No hay problema, la idea es ayudar. Gracias por la actitud.

Estás invitado al chat de la comunidad OSM Chile en Telegram (app muy similar a whatsapp) en el link: https://t.me/OSMcl. Ahí conversamos todas las dudas y acuerdos de la comunidad.

saludos
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-15 14:10:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13001930638

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2025-07-16 13:18:04+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark. You have noticed that a mapper back in 2017 mapped and tagged many waterways, just as a stream, without considering the width. So, often it should be tagged as a river. (When it is too wide to jump over it, tag it as a river)
Best regards
Frans S (2025-07-16 13:24:26+00:00): Hi. Another point. 
When you want to map a building. Just map each separate building, Do not cluster them please.
This is a waterway and farmland  project. Please focus on those subjects.

Best regards and keep mappings
NeisBot (2025-07-15 14:18:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 06:00:41+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/169090395
NeisBot (2025-07-15 14:21:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 05:59:51+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/169090395
NeisBot (2025-07-15 14:27:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
E-Tax World (2025-07-15 15:16:55+00:00): Here a common man can get solution to his tax related problems very easily.
NeisRevert (2025-07-16 06:29:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/168996182
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove spam
user_5359 (2025-07-16 10:56:33+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13001971008. What is the mean of the tag 073-369 = 0593?
OttoR (2025-07-16 19:43:27+00:00): an error
flohoff (2025-07-15 19:02:47+00:00): Moin,
ich hab deinen changeset gesehen. Cool das du mit mappst.

Du kannst hier nochmal gucken - Die telefonnummern bei OSM sollten immer im internationalen Format sein also +4952414711

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone

Keep on mapping :)

Flo
user_23098232 (2025-07-15 19:27:08+00:00): Hey,
danke für die Rückmeldung!
Ich werde die Telefonnummer überarbeiten und es für zukünftiges Mapping berücksichtigen.
redd (2026-03-30 11:09:38+00:00): Hi bigbug21,
In der note=* hat sich scheinbar ein Tippfehler beim alten Namen eingeschlichen mit craoshi statt Caroshi.

Es gibt übrigens auch den Tag old_name=*, der genau das impliziert und den ich üblicherweise dafür verwenden würde. 

Freundliche Grüße,

Redd
bigbug21 (2026-03-30 18:50:43+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ändere es gerne ab, wenn du in dieser Gegend ohnehin bei OSM aktiv bist.
aceman444 (2025-11-10 17:54:24+00:00): Zdravim, na tomto mieste Party Confetti nie je. Je predsa davno zakreslene o par metrov dalej, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12062162894 . Pri vysokych domoch je GPS velmi nepresna. Trebasi polohu kontrolovat relativne podla vchodov, inych obchodov a pod.
wolf991 (2025-07-15 14:42:06+00:00): Sorry, it's my second day here...
MaliMrav (2025-08-07 08:15:52+00:00): Zdravo,

Promena naziva je urađena polovično, pa sad imamo izmešane nazive:

int_name=Sveti Hubert
name=Хуберт
name:de=Sankt Hubert
name:en=Saint-Hubert
name:hu=Szenthubert
name:sr=Свети Хуберт
name:sr-Latn=Hubert

Da li biste mogli da popravite da nazivi budu na svim jezicima konzistentni (ili Hubert ili Sveti Hubert, a ne pomešano)?

Hvala.
tomaja (2025-08-07 08:36:54+00:00): Srpski naziv (koji koristi lokalno stanovništvo) jeste Hubert, a nije Sveti Hubert. Ostali zaista koriste varijante imena Sveti Hubert što je originalno ime.
MaliMrav (2025-08-07 08:44:44+00:00): Ok. Popravio sam name:sr tag i dodao napomenu u note.
tomaja (2025-08-07 21:16:39+00:00): Da, name:sr sam ispustio. Hvala!
user_5359 (2025-07-16 10:02:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM ! Please be careful. You move a node more than 100 meters cros over other streets and buildings.
muralito (2025-07-15 16:50:09+00:00): Hola. No se que quisiste hacer, porque habia un radar mapeado y quedo mal, el nodo y la relacion. ¿no está mas?
hgcaetano (2025-07-15 19:41:30+00:00): Hola, el radar sigue ahí, error mío
muralito (2025-07-16 00:21:03+00:00): Solucionado. Gracias.
citrula (2025-07-15 21:21:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM. I have some concerns about these "Neighbor Self Storage" POIs you are adding.

neighbor.com is a marketplace for third parties to rent out their storage units, right? If I walked up to this apartment complex, could I tell that it was also a neighbor.com storage location?
AV5101 (2025-07-16 15:24:11+00:00): Hello! Yes, we have designated storage units and parking spots with a phone number and linked QR code. The front desk staff also are trained on handling on-site visitors. We also have signs that have the aforementioned information (phone number and QR code), so people can take a look at these storage units/parking spaces themselves.
citrula (2025-07-17 01:06:46+00:00): Thanks for the response. Is this the case for every POI you have added? Are you adding these on behalf of neighbor.com or the host (UDR?)
AV5101 (2025-07-17 15:22:22+00:00): Yes it is. I'm adding these on behalf of Neighbor.com!
Glassman (2025-07-15 23:34:12+00:00): Driveways are typically considered private and unless the driveway is posted as no trespassing then an access tag is redundant.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168970141
DiogoBaptista98 (2026-06-25 17:49:34+00:00): This edit appears to be incorrect. The Ministry of Finance is already mapped at node 12034930390. According to the "one feature, one OSM element" principle, the Ministry should not also be added as a name on the building polygon. The Ministry of Finance is an institution, not a building itself, it merely occupies a building. Therefore, the institution and the building are different features and should be mapped separately, with the institution remaining mapped on node 12034930390 and the building only carrying tags that describe the physical structure. Additionally, the name has been entered with an incorrect accent, "Ministèrio" instead of the correct Portuguese spelling, "Ministério". For these reasons, the building should not be tagged with this name.
StC (2025-07-18 07:57:27+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
AnatoleFrance (2025-07-18 08:04:58+00:00): Bonjour StC,

Merci de votre vigilance et désolé pour la rupture de l'itinéraire pédestre.

Cordialement
目立たない (2025-07-18 12:27:15+00:00): a u sure ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168971073
silversurfer83 (2025-07-15 18:09:29+00:00): Hi :)

ich nehme an, dass du alle Trekkingplätze nach Website hinzugefügt hast. Meiner Meinung nach wäre dann ein "fixme=survey location" oder ähnlich angebracht, oder?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168971817
giggls (2025-07-16 08:56:01+00:00): Das sind die "offiziellen" Koordinaten von der Website und die steht als Quelle im changeset. Ich habe die Positionen außerdem manuell auf Plausibilität geprüft.

Also alles gut IMO.

Ich hatte überlegt noch als fixme oder note hinzuschreiben dass man die Objekte möglichst mit Vor-Ort Wissen als Polygon erfassen sollte aber das habe ich in der Bug-Section bei der Opencampingmap ja ohnehin schon drin.
SomeoneElse (2025-07-17 07:59:01+00:00): Hello,
Just wondered whether there should be a gap in the non-NCN Mercian Way at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12015034#map=20/51.7439262/-2.2222510 ? (you can see two orange bits of the relation with a gap here).
Best Regards,
Andy
Simon Sustrans (2025-07-18 13:05:59+00:00): Hi Andy, well spotted! I have removed the short segment of the Stroud link.
Best, Simon Pratt
rarad74 (2025-07-17 09:10:46+00:00): Salut. Ai facut ceva gresit ca ai dezactivat tot multipoligonul  din zona Ochiuri.
rarad74 (2025-07-17 09:11:12+00:00): Aici - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168971921#map=13/45.00984/25.55506
Tiberiu Popescu (2025-07-17 11:17:31+00:00): Salut. Am adaugat perimetrul spitalului ca inner relation pentru padure. Am eliminat acum relatia si ar trebui sa redevina vizibil multipoligonul. Mersi ca mi-ai spus.
pb-mapping (2025-07-29 13:19:17+00:00): So you've taken it upon yourself to remove clearly visible footpaths?
Evan Carroll (2025-07-29 13:51:04+00:00): @pb-mapping I created them. You made them side walks. I merely changed them back to footpaths, as they were when I created them. For an example see this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413117430
vmicho (2025-07-16 06:06:45+00:00): Servus. Toto je co za nezmysel?
MrIP (2025-07-16 09:29:07+00:00): Neviem, ako sa to stalo.
vmicho (2025-07-20 15:45:18+00:00): :D
a to parkovisko vpravo zmizlo?
NeisBot (2025-07-15 15:51:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 05:57:43+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/169090342
geow (2025-07-16 11:32:05+00:00): Hi, nur aus Neugier, hast du "gravel" vor Ort geprüft oder nur vermutet?
smoothness=intermediate würde mE eher auf "fine_gravel" zutreffen. 
Danke für ein kurzes feedback 🖖
Tatfahren (2025-07-16 15:11:27+00:00): Im note war Schotter angegeben welchen ich als gravel kenne. 
fine_gravel kenne ich eher von Fußwegen und ähnlichen Pfaden.
In diesem Fall handelt es sich um eine Zufahrt zum landwirtschaftlichen Betrieb, wo wohl schnell Fahrspuren entstehen würden, wenn dort täglich mehrere Fahrzeuge über losen Splitt fahren.
geow (2025-07-16 15:29:48+00:00): Danke, verstehe. Splitt und Schotter unterscheiden sich i.w. in der Korngröße und nicht im Grad der Verfestigung -> https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schotter 
Da der örtliche Hinweisgeber selbst fine_gravel gemappt hat erscheint mir das plausibler. Die Grenzen zwischen Splitt und Schotter sind aber in der Praxis fließend...
Tatfahren (2025-07-16 15:52:54+00:00): Ich habs jetzt zurückgesetzt. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169021031
geow (2025-07-16 16:59:58+00:00): Danke 😊
5m4u9 (2025-07-16 04:18:57+00:00): Hola y bienvenid@! gracias por mejorar el mapa.

Tengo una duda, la calle republiquetas sería que une de oeste a este el primer anillo? o es la nuflo de chavez desde la potosí? 🤔
Natsu_ (2025-07-15 16:10:45+00:00): 公共汽车线路M190更新。
rempshaener (2025-07-16 19:03:47+00:00): Hallo,
ich möchte dich noch einmal bitten, bei Hydranten keine Adress-Fragmente zu hinterlegen.
Viele Grüße
Brickblock1 (2025-07-16 09:12:16+00:00): This isn't light rail it's an ordinary railway
QuiLe (2025-12-31 05:02:26+00:00): Hi, I'm working on adding addr tags around SH 78, and it seems there is no Name tag for specific sections, particularly for Sachse, Texas. The issue I'm running into is that all the address tags for businesses and buildings now have outdated or incorrect names since the street name was removed. I'm not too familiar with the noname tag, but I assume all of these should at least have a name.
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-01 02:48:24+00:00): That's a problem with the validator.  References are not street names and don't go in the name tag.  You can safely tell your validator of choice to ignore it if the address is right, just doesn't match the name of the street, it's a common and known shortcoming with most validators on US addresses.
democat (2026-01-01 07:25:21+00:00): Isn't SH 78 signed on the ground as the street name though?
democat (2026-01-01 07:26:11+00:00): at least in Sachse it is
QuiLe (2026-01-01 07:49:05+00:00): Yes in Sachse it’s signed as SH 78 or HWY 78. Expanded then it should be State Highway 78 or Highway 78
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-01 18:38:10+00:00): No, incorrect, that's what noname=yes is for.  The name is only the name, never the highway number.
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-01 18:39:12+00:00): The name tag is actually really well documented in the wiki.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
QuiLe (2026-01-01 18:55:57+00:00): I see that now. Would it still be appropriate to at least use short_name to list the name as listed on a street sign?
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-01 19:11:05+00:00): I wouldn't think so, because it's still not an name of the way, but even on the route route relation, that'd still not be a name.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2025-07-24 22:30:39+00:00): Hey,

This type of error is improper tagging from MapComplete. Please report this upstream, I can fix it then.
SimonPoole (2025-07-15 16:52:02+00:00): Sorry wrong comment, this was in Suhr.
maraf24 (2025-07-15 20:56:20+00:00): Nie ma w OSM takiego kryterium "za" jak dyskutowano. Dyskusja musi mieć pozytywne zakończenie, w postaci głosowania lub konsensusu.
Zmiany wycofałem.
pavvv (2025-07-15 21:10:49+00:00): Miało, bo ustaliliśmy, że wszystkie odcinki zaznaczone na czerwono w tabelce szalonej entropii mają zostać podniesione do trunk i nie było ani jednego głosu sprzeciwu. Teraz stan aktualny to trunk na Karkonoskiej, a ewentualne obniżenia są do przedyskutowania na forum.
Brickblock1 (2025-07-16 09:11:08+00:00): Not light rail it's a tram
substandardhealthcare (2025-07-15 17:12:10+00:00): The source should be TD's site instead of RBC's site, but I forgot to change it.
aboc (2025-07-21 22:09:46+00:00): Attento, hai mosso tutti i punti della relazione TranSardinia stage 2 di circa 5.4 metri a Est. Riesci a rispostarli? Escludi quelli coincidenti con la SS389 a NordOvest di Bitti, li ho giá riallineati
Dino Michelini (2025-07-22 06:11:38+00:00): Credo che ti stia sbagliando. Le geometrie delle strade a cui accenni SS389 della tappa 2 della TS non sono state toccate da me.; studia meglio i changeset (https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-edits-tile/#12/40.4669/9.3840). . Inoltre, il chageset che segnali #16897608 riguarda tre geometrie che nulla hanno a che vedere con highway. Ultimamente, per la tappa 2 della TS ho solo aggiunto un nuovo passaggio che riguarda dei sentieri perché due ragazzi cecoslovacchi che hanno percorso la TS a primavera mi hanno segnalato la impraticabilità ) del precedente percorso (scomparsa del sentiero a causa della vegetazione.
aboc (2025-07-22 08:42:10+00:00): Ci sono 2832 punti modificati oltre alle geometrie in questione in questo changeset https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=168976086#18/40.28360/9.39793 che vanno a spostare singolarmente ogni punto facente parte della relazione MA non c'è nessuna modifica di geometria e perciò non ha sollevato warning.