piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Kovoschiz (2024-10-14 09:31:26+00:00): `name:zh=` could be interpreted as Cantonese in the form of Standard Written Chinese as well. Fundamentally `zh` would easier to be understood as Written Chinese. Language as spoken, which is what romanization is concerned with, would be better posed with using the more precise encompassed language.
Kovoschiz (2024-10-14 09:37:37+00:00): You can say the names in Cantonese and Mandarin is the same. Unfortunately, this will simply encourage people to add `name:yue=` .
Kovoschiz (2024-10-14 09:41:53+00:00): Alternatively, we can add both `name:zh-Latn-pinyin` and `name:cmn-Latn-pinyin` , so that it is clear this is a software limitation. Hopefully this will discourage people from adding `name:yue=` .
Kovoschiz (2024-10-14 09:43:34+00:00): A related issue is how  `name:zh-Hans=`, and `name:zh-Hant=` , etc is often added. That's the amount of permutation/combination on the extra work, for `name:yue-Hant=` etc.  So the effect of all these needs to be considered.
chris66 (2025-03-05 18:30:21+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1323674971

noch gesperrt?
Vogelmensch (2025-03-06 23:11:51+00:00): Moin, 
die Stelle ist aktuell wieder frei, dafür sind gegenüber 5 Meter gesperrt. Ich hab die Freigabe mal eingetragen, die gesperrte Stelle trage ich nicht ein, da ich nicht weiß wie lange die besteht. 
Laut https://radrouten.eglv.de/news/
bzw. https://radrouten.eglv.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Umleitung-Paul_Gerhardt_RE-06.01.2025-scaled.jpg
soll die Sperrung noch länger bestehen. 
Es ist auch eine weitläufige Umfahrung über die Marien-/Merveldstr. ausgeschildert. 
Schaus mir die Tage aber nochmal genauer an und passe dann die Route an die ausgeschilderte Umleitung an. Die Umleitung ist mein ich, abweichend von der EGLV Mitteilung, von der KLT bis In der Mährenfurt ausgeschildert.
Constantino José Rocha Cronemberger (2024-10-13 18:15:23+00:00): O the right side of the road coming from Sant Andreu de la Barca there is a sign, but it applies to the access to the Autovia del Nord-est, on the exist on the right, not to those going straight.
LKAsahi (2024-11-17 10:28:05+00:00): Hi. Thank you for your contribution! However, your edit was incorrect as it is not what's on the ground and I have therefore reverted it.
KingVik (2024-11-17 10:44:15+00:00): Alright, Thank you
StC (2025-03-03 09:59:27+00:00): Hello Luc,

est-ce que cet itinéraire fait partie du réseau de carrefours ?
mavl (2024-11-13 05:46:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159076666, 159076665, 159076660 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
CAI Stabia (2024-10-15 07:07:18+00:00): Buongiorno Pasquale, ci siamo accorti che stai effettuando numerosi changeset tutti con la dicitura "Not reported".
Nel ringraziarti per il tuo lavoro di mapper, ti chiediamo la cortesia di dettagliare meglio ogni changeset, inserendo un titolo più esplicativo al fine di far comprendere agli altri mapper cosa stai facendo, così come indicato al seguente link:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_change

Ti ringrazio anticipatamente
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157847305
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-13 18:41:06+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/878196664

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
TrickyFoxy (2024-10-15 22:23:53+00:00): Каков источник ваших данных?

У https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60409795 на панорамах видно пять этажей, а не 4
Marek-M (2024-10-13 19:21:18+00:00): Cześć, edycja jak ostatnie całkiem fajna  - wywalanie podwójnych ścieżek na rzecz jednej linii przy braku rozdziału, super.

Zauważyłem jednak, że przytrafił Ci się tutaj błąd z duplikatem platformy oczekiwania na autobus:
Niepotrzebnie dodałeś do https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1273524986 tag `public_transport=platform`, bo ten tag już posiada słupek autobusowy https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8416698706 - obszar oczekiwania wystarczy zmapować tak jak był, czyli tylko z tagami `area=yes`
`highway=platform`
stasiu512 (2024-10-13 19:29:14+00:00): Cześć, iD pokazywał poprzedni stan jako błędny więc z automatu uaktualniłem znaczniki. Już cofam do poprzedniego stanu.
Marek-M (2024-10-13 19:36:46+00:00): Dzięki :)

iD ma swoje bolączki, z którymi ciężko walczyć. Ta propozycja iD jest prawidłowa, gdy nie ma słupka ale tego iD nie sprawdza.
HellMap (2025-08-04 20:01:46+00:00): Hello,

You changed this service road into a path - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126129864 . Can you please clarify what has changed here? I have undone this for now because this is not what is on aerial, this removes access to the property North and this also seems to be one of the entrances for the properties South.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-24 03:15:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964326638 is not a footway
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157848484
mueschel (2024-10-14 17:12:17+00:00): Hi,
could you check this import? There's a large number of foreign tags on many ways. Can these tags be removed?
HellMap (2024-10-17 15:35:15+00:00): Can you please clarify what (traffic) signage is here for the road such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/805255581 that forbids foot movement? And why the bridge is not included?
HellMap (2024-11-24 13:15:09+00:00): You haven't replied to my concern, so I have reverted this changeset for now.
DV1ABG (2025-10-04 09:27:40+00:00): Hallo,
der Weg "Am Kalkbruch" wird beim Routing mit dem Fahrrad nicht mit einbezogen.
Woran kann das liegen?
Grüße
Volker
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-13 19:37:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Marii Konopnickiej":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248949838

"Długa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248960202

"Tadeusza Żeleńskiego-Boya":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248960294

"Radosna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248960296

"Pułaskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248960317

"Wspólna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248960351

"Ogrodowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248960448

"Ligonia":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248960454

"Sienkiewicza":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248960585

"Napierskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248960693

"Morcinka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248960760

"Hrabiny Raczyńskiej":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248960764

"Żwirki i Wigury":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248960803
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248960979

"Pisarka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248960860

"Długosza":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248960985

"Księdza Brzuski":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248961038

"Ks. Stanisława Gawlasa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248961063

"Profesora Maksymiliana Hubera":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248961223

"3 Maja":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12248961421

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Endres Pelka (2024-11-17 11:21:42+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:opening_hours
eggie (2024-10-13 20:33:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Wanneer dit weer een woonhuis is dan kan dat uiteraard aangepast worden.
Een adres op de gebouwomtrek zetten we niet in OSM in Nederland. We hebben al adresnodes.
Het adres zal ik verwijderen. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Tomas Straupis (2024-10-14 05:51:53+00:00): However this means, that we can remove all name:ru in Baltic states and a lot of other places around the world as well, as there are no russian names on the ground there...
dpolovinkin (2024-10-14 06:30:35+00:00): were they also added massively and mechanically for political reasons without any discussion of proofs, using some kind of translator? or were they added because of history between Russia/Baltic states, where Russian language was indeed used there? It's obviously more like a rhetorical question, so what's you point here? :)
Tomas Straupis (2024-10-14 06:48:23+00:00): My point here is that it is an important PRECEDENT where we follow "on the ground rule" strictly and if there is no sign in language X on the ground - we remove the name:xx tag. Irrespective of which armies have invaded which places.
dpolovinkin (2024-10-14 07:31:44+00:00): It seems you just decided to just see it as a precedent like this, but it is not actually related. You left the first step of of logic here. It's not the case of following "on ground" rules suddenly on something which was added long time ago normally for some reasons, espeeeecially if another country did in fact control another and language of this 1st country was indeed used in 2nd (so it's not correct to say armies and all this is irrespective). 

It's a revert of recent unverifiable massive mechanical edits with no verification (and all know it's done for political reasons too) - which is not allowed to do, user was banned for this, and created several alts to revert the reverts of those changes.

If you suddenly decided to mechanically translate all the names of all lakes, rivers, shops, military objects, clinics (just a sample of what this user did) - in Spain to German language, just as an example - you would be surprised to see all of this reverted and would also say it's an important PRECEDENT of following "on ground rule" strictly or what? :)
Tomas Straupis (2024-10-14 07:47:17+00:00): As we can see with your invasion of Ukraine - russian language is used politically to motivate aggression and nurture your populations nazism/chauvinism. So one can easily say that adding name:ru is also political (and dangerous!). You did not keep German names after the German invasion of WW2, why should anybody keep russian names after your invasion? But this is all irrelevant in OSM. No label on the ground - no tag in OSM.
dpolovinkin (2024-10-14 08:36:46+00:00): ohh, so this is what it's about XD. 
If you say German, so say Russian, not russian, for you to not look petty heh. Won't even comment about this usage of Russian you imagined something about lol. "your invasion, aggression, nazism, dangerous"... sad to see that some people are that conditioned there. Nazism of nation which literally defeated nazism, yeah...

And which German "names" are you talking about? You really did now make an argument comparing territories which were temporarily occupied by Germany during active war and them taken back and no German people were left with the case of Baltic states, which were literally parts of USSR for half a century (and I can see from the point of view saying it was an occupation) and where in some countries like 1/3 of the population were Russian? Wow. As I've said, sad to see.

And for "No label on the ground - no tag in OSM." - it's for community to decide what to do with Russian language in Baltic states if it's not on the ground but in the history (hard to deny, I afraid), not you alone. Well.. if you don't want to get another block in addition to that one from that  gatekeeping of Lithuania of yours, of course ;)

But overall, after those sudden political attacks, don't see the value of continuing that discussion.
DaanLT (2024-10-14 12:25:09+00:00): Dpolovinkin can please stop threatening with blocks, you can keep russian shit for yourself and don't spread it all around.
dpolovinkin (2024-10-16 06:57:21+00:00): hm, what is it, another russophobe from Baltics? where did you even come from to this thread and why? mr Thomas asked to, I suppose? interesting :D
Tomas Straupis (2024-10-16 07:39:04+00:00): Leave your ruso-nazi propaganda to yourself. We got important information: precedent of removal of name:xx because of lack of on the ground labels. And there are no russian signs in Lithuania. Done.
TrickyFoxy (2024-10-16 07:53:10+00:00): Please read the reasons for blocking https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/avinet_ua/blocks and comments about poor-quality automatic translation that this user ignored.

And you can also find dozens of fake accounts of this user, with the help of which he bypassed the blocking and carried out global vandalism with inscriptions all over the world, deleted name:ru and continued making automatic translations.
dpolovinkin (2024-10-16 08:06:48+00:00): yep that's right. It seems that he just wants to find a way or a reason to see this revert of massive automated low-quality translations (of places which don't have any connections to this language) as a example to justify the removal of Russian language from Lithuania, no matter that it's there for real historical reasons. All the while it's obvious by messages that it's motivated strictly by political reasons, just like what avinet user has done on much bigger scale and was blocked.

So I don't know what is "done" there, but yep.
Tomas Straupis (2024-10-16 08:19:05+00:00): I've checked some Ukrainian translations he added, seem fine to me. I would not support the actions he does, but fully understand the reasoning: you are a nazi country which invaded his country so this is a natural reaction and observable not only in your neighbouring countries. Oh, we have one object on the ground with actual russian text on it, it gives direction to your military ship. That object will stay intact, it is an actual attraction :-)
TrickyFoxy (2024-10-16 08:28:26+00:00): Just because automatic translation was able to translate several names correctly doesn't mean that all other translations are correct. If he had performed a manual translation check, he would have found errors that were reported to him in the comments. But it was performing a mindless automatic translation. In fact, an undisclosed import.
Kogacarlo (2024-11-06 13:19:07+00:00): Je hebt een aantal straten paving stones gegeven maar het is asfalt.
Hoi2948 (2024-11-08 12:11:22+00:00): Oeps, je hebt helemaal gelijk, ik heb het aangepast (Boskampstraat en deel van de Watermunt zijn nu asfalt): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158892925
codylaeder (2024-10-13 20:28:31+00:00): I've also summited a request for GNIS to update the GNIS database.
itsbrody (2024-10-14 06:29:18+00:00): Hab deine Anfrage bei Matrix:#osm-de gesehen; ein Wanderweg ist zwar schlüssig, dass der allerdings über das Bahngelände läuft - für mich nicht.
SimonHarms (2024-10-14 07:22:42+00:00): Haben wir den Möglichkeit, in Erfahrung zu bringen wo das Bahngelände genau liegt? Oder anders gefragt: Nach welchen Informationen wurde damals das Bahngelände eingezeichnet?
highflyer74 (2024-10-14 07:28:49+00:00): Das Bahngelände kann genauso gut etwas zu großzügig in OSM ausgelegt sein. Wenn es nach dem besten Luftbild nicht klar zu erkennen ist, was dort Sache ist: entweder hinfahren und die Lage erfassen (inkl. Beschilderung des Weges), oder einen Hinweis erstellen, das Problem genau beschreiben und darauf hoffen, daß jemand vor Ort es tut.
SimonHarms (2024-10-15 11:32:30+00:00): Also es gibt keine wirkliche Beschilderung, die darauf hinweist, dass das Bahngelände ist.
Es ist aber relativ deutlich durch eine Hecke vom Bahngelände abgetrennt.
mtmail (2024-10-17 14:31:20+00:00): What do the tags on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1323700928 mean?
eggie (2024-10-14 09:31:29+00:00): Dag PGM,

Vriendelijk verzoek om street side parkings niet vast te plakken aan de wegen.
Ook is niet alles een parking ook al lijkt dat zo op de kaart. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=157851721

en nog een foutmelding
warnings:disconnected_way:highway
  	1

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-10-14 09:40:07+00:00): Een paar heb ik aangepast
conform de wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side
Up to you.
Mapse
eggie
TheFighter137 (2024-10-13 20:55:10+00:00): Erreur sur le titre, rien à voir avec Rouen ; je me suis trop précipité haha
Sur ce changeset j'ai notamment précisé le mapping de maisons individuelles, d'axes routiers, et j'ai ajouté beaucoup de driveways.
InfernoOSM (2024-10-15 21:28:24+00:00): You have tagged the entire school as a single building under construction, which is incongruent with the school's plan, and does not make sense overall. Further, the school was completed in Q1 2024, so there is no need to add under construction buildings.
SpinOff (2024-10-15 20:55:36+00:00): Consider changing tracktype as well. grade3 does not look to be correct basing on your description
Joseph R P (2024-10-14 19:17:58+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap. When mapping bike lanes, please instead use cycleway tags on the roads the lanes are a part of rather than mapping them separately. See here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway#Dedicated_bicycle_lanes
Tjuro (2024-10-14 08:09:04+00:00): Hello PowerGeoMapping.

I would like to discuss some of the changes and choices in this changeset. Overall what i am seeing is al lack of quality and some problems that need to be fixed.

With:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1323706050
You have drawn a way that is impossible to navigate as the entrance is underground.

with:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1323706049
you have drawn a pedestrian area even over non-walkable area's.

Here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1323706070
you have created a place=square without a name place=square should always have a name.

here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1323706043
you have connected a parking to a highway=residential, Parking street side should not be connected to any highway

Please take a look at the changeset and fix these and other issues.

Geetings,

Tjuro
Tjuro (2024-10-14 09:36:08+00:00): I whould like to ask you to make better changeset comments in the future, comments like "Improving Gelderland" do not tell anything about what you have done. It is not any better than no comment at all.

For example if you add some parking, say "added some parking". That is saying what you did.
Tatfahren (2024-10-31 18:42:20+00:00): Hallo osmer,
du hast bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/138921516 wahrscheinlich versehentlich ein 2km langes Tor ("barrier=gate") erstellt, was garantiert keines ist. Leider kann ich aufgrund des Baumbewuchses nicht eindeutig bestimmen, ob es stattdessen ein Zaun, eine Mauer, oder sonst irgendwas ist.

Kannst du das nochmal prüfen und korrigieren?

Danke!
lostmike (2024-10-14 09:53:36+00:00): I'm not sure that amenity=biergarten is valid here. To quote from the WIKI: "To be clear, a biergarten is not the same as (what is known in the UK as) a "beer garden", i.e., an outside area associated with a pub."
Railwayfan2005 (2024-10-14 18:38:32+00:00): What's the correct tag for a beer garden?
lostmike (2024-10-14 19:32:36+00:00): It's, complicated.
Here is a good start though.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:outdoor_seating
I usually use acmbination of:
leisure=outdoor_seating
outdoor_seating=garden
Railwayfan2005 (2024-10-14 23:10:08+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity

specifically says 

"Biergarten or beer garden is an open-air area where alcoholic beverages along with food is prepared and served. See also the description of the tags amenity=pub;bar;restaurant. A biergarten can commonly be found attached to a beer hall, pub, bar, or restaurant. In this case, you can use biergarten=yes additional to amenity=pub;bar;restaurant. 

None of this really helps as the important thing about the Beer Garden is availabilit of alcoholic beverages, which the leisure=outdoor_seating
outdoor_seating=garden combination doesn't imply.

I propose the Biergaten tag be changed to encompass the English Beer Gardens instead.
lostmike (2024-10-15 06:59:56+00:00): I think it's been proosed before . Not sure of the process for this though.
trigpoint (2024-10-15 09:42:55+00:00): A biergarten, as many of us visited I. Germany, is a very different thing to a British pub beer garden and the tagging should be kept separate.

A biergarten is usually a standalone object, not an outside area of a pub.

As lostmike says British beer gardens are best covered using the outside seating tag or the is some usage of amenity=beer_garden.

However an existing tag which describes a real world object should not be changed to cover an entirely different object
murble (2024-10-15 10:05:19+00:00): Does it actually operate as a biergarten, e.g. separate business that sells beer, typically with table service ,outside in a garten, rather than an outdoor seating area for a bar or pub?  in the uk we typically do the seperate seating area tagging, although also had amenity=beer_garden which doesn't imply the meanings biergarten have.
Railwayfan2005 (2024-10-15 20:33:19+00:00): I've changed it to amenity=beer_garden
zhiar590 (2024-10-14 10:54:42+00:00): hi the name of the Turkmen school is Qara Oglan you could just write it in Arabic I didn't know how to write it in Arabic so I just wrote what was written in the sign
Baloo Uriza (2024-10-23 15:02:18+00:00): Not seeing this as an improvement...you've mapped medians that don't appear to exist, though even if there were medians there, then the north to east sliproad is still too long by about three times, as it should start when it splits from the road and use lane tagging (not a seperate way) for the right turn lane.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157853615
Silva1989 (2024-10-23 16:56:52+00:00): Hello Baloo
Thank you for your constructive criticism. My main goal with this edit was dealing with a relation without members or tags.
The lane separation is visible on Bing imagery. I'm not used to do turn lane tagging, but maybe you can help out with that or instead add a note on osm.org so that a mapper can have a look into that.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157853615
Vinber-Pro (2024-10-14 10:07:26+00:00): salut,
dans la description tu parles de commandes privées mais l'accès aux oeuvres est bien public ?

c'est énorme toute la mise à jour que tu fais !

à plus
Donlooba411 (2024-10-16 13:18:04+00:00): Salut,

Tout à fait, l'accès est public. 

C'est juste une question de production : en l'occurrence c'est le proprio du Bibalka qui a payé la création (et non l'agglo) = commande privée. 

Si c'est trop ambiguë je peux supprimer / remplacer cette expression.

nb : grosse passe oui ^^
(avec un peu d'aide !)
- Merci
HirschKauz (2024-10-14 07:55:22+00:00): hi ZROP  
Wenn highway=* bereits parking:*:* gemappt hat, dann ist zusätzliches mappen von Parkbuchten unnötig (was ja der Sinn des neuen Parking(side) ist. Ansonsten muss am highway das tagging auf parking:side=separate gesetzt werden. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking#Separately_mapped_parking_areas_and_spaces
Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157853701
Zrop (2024-10-14 10:53:11+00:00): Hi HirschKauz,
ups, da hast Du natürlich Recht. Hatte ich leider übersehen. Ist jetzt angepasst. Danke für den Hinweis.

Gruß
Zrop
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-13 22:40:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12249164333

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀