piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:51:27+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401421
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:51:25+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401420
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:51:23+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401419
GA_Kevin (2025-03-17 16:07:45+00:00): Thank you for your additions to Lowndes County!
eggie (2025-03-16 15:22:18+00:00): Dag Bas...

Je kunt het voorlopig ook zo laten, maar als er geen plannen met doe weg zijn is het ook geen construction.
Het is nu meer een highway=track   Zo zou je het voorlopig ook kunnen intekenen. 
Zo te zien is de weg geblokkeerd aan het begin. 
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.00240,5.545486,19/?datastrip=20240918_SVNEO-01
Je kunt dan op een node verbonden met de weg barrier=block taggen
met vehicle=no
Groet
eggie
Kovoschiz (2025-03-17 16:31:30+00:00): You merged an `office=` into a `railway=buffer_stop`
Edison Wen (2025-03-18 05:45:42+00:00): My fault. Sorry for this issue.
I'll pay more attention next time.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:51:21+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401417
eggie (2025-03-16 17:03:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:51:18+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401416
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:51:16+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401415
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:51:13+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401414
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:51:11+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401412
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:51:08+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401410
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:51:06+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401409
Hufkratzer (2025-03-16 20:58:24+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1368108899 is not a horse a riding centre. It is probably the outdoor arena described on https://www.arkenfieldstables.co.uk/facility-hire. In OSM such riding arenas are usually tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian.

Maybe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1368108902 is a small riding arena too; I don't know. Or perhaps it is something else (paddock?).

You can use the tag leisure=horse_riding for the whole riding stables / equestrian centre; see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian), example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380370797

I don't know what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1366053178 is, but I think it cannot be a riding arena because there cannot be buildings on a riding arena.
Wetyiop (2025-03-18 10:16:15+00:00): Thankyou for your comments, I will amend accordingly.
rui228 (2025-05-13 17:29:38+00:00): Olá. dmfr. 
Linha: 1368109276
Podes atribuir uma etiqueta a esta linha, do NorteShopping. 
Faz parte do desafio do MapRoulette Portugal fix objects without tag.
dmfr (2025-05-13 22:02:42+00:00): Resolvido. Obrigado pela chamada de atenção.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:51:04+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401408
gurglypipe (2025-03-17 09:51:18+00:00): Hiya, thanks for your edits around the northern Lakes recently!

When editing footpaths/bridleways, please be careful to retain the existing access, designation and prow_ref tagging, which someone else has taken the time to add. This tagging is what records whether a footpath/bridleway is actually a legal right of way, and is used by route finding apps.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access_provisions_in_the_United_Kingdom#Public_bridleways

I’ve re-added the missing tagging here in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163723157

Happy editing :)
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:51:01+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401406
Geim (2025-03-16 15:11:22+00:00): >10  meter natuurlijk
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:50:59+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401405
map per (2025-03-16 18:13:35+00:00): Because of review_requested:
The edit looks good, thank you!
Geim (2025-03-16 15:11:43+00:00): >10 meter natuurlijk
Geim (2025-03-16 15:10:44+00:00): >10 meter natuurlijk.
wireguy (2025-03-16 17:08:56+00:00): Jim, Welcome to OSM.  Thanks for the additions.  Glad to "see" someone I know IRL fixing the map.   See you at the Bean.
Plain Jim (2025-03-16 21:18:06+00:00): Whoa! I had no idea you'd see this... but it was your edits that gave me the idea to do this. Thanks for lighting the way.
pyrog (2026-03-10 08:39:55+00:00): Bonjour,

La modification de ce way à probablement cassée l'itinéraire de randonnée pédestre PR 2 - Sentier des berges.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220423647

Je corrige.

Cordialement,
Yves - Groupe OSM Plein AIr
map per (2025-03-16 18:19:01+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
schaumärmel (2025-03-17 07:14:54+00:00): Danke fürs Überprüfen!
Glassman (2025-03-16 21:35:04+00:00): It appears that you are connecting the sidewalk to the road when they don't. There has been quite a bit of discussion on this subject but I don't think any consensus has been reached.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163695604
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 15:06:09+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/861158033/history has surface = loose_sand that was added in this edit
Is there any kind of sand except loose sand? Why not use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dsand ? Note that for earth (that tends to stick more than sand) we have surface=dirt
Rawmance (2025-07-30 20:45:36+00:00): This was already discussed on the openstreetmap forums. For mountainbiking you would need really need a loose sand scale or loose soil scale from 1-5 or so.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-31 06:24:27+00:00): that would be https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mtb-surface-looseness-tag-loose-sand-swamps-and-so-on/127984 - right?
Rawmance (2025-08-01 18:59:41+00:00): Yes. The tag I meant was Persistently Muddy not persistently_muddy. That has been widely adopt for a Finnish map application. But has the same flaw of needing a scale to it same as loose soil or sand.
PardusTigris (2025-03-16 16:34:18+00:00): Erreur de source : BDOrtho IGN et non pas Ortho Express 2024.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:50:56+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401402
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:50:54+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401399
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:50:51+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401397
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:50:49+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401393
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:50:46+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401391
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:50:43+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401390
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:50:40+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401388
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:50:38+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401386
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-16 17:10:55+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10309758158

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:50:35+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401384
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:50:33+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401383
Skylark_H_C (2025-04-06 15:43:41+00:00): 创源路似乎不是西边那条？
目前是原 青松路 改名
https://www.zhuhai.gov.cn/smzj/gkmlpt/content/2/2732/mpost_2732216.html#6337
Lepuse (2025-04-07 14:51:24+00:00): 光看图理解错了，似乎找不到关于此路的命名?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:50:31+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401381
mueschel (2025-03-17 08:49:03+00:00): Hi,
may I ask you for a full documentation of this tagging scheme you use since several years? Right now you're the only one who can make sense out of these tags, e.g. there are letters in the number suffixes that nobody else uses.
yopaseopor (2025-03-17 23:34:23+00:00): Yes, here you have a draft updated to 2025.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Yopaseopor#Alternative_aproximation.
mueschel (2025-03-18 08:11:38+00:00): PLEASE put this to proper discussion and documentation before starting to add dozens of new tags. This scheme is incompatible to all the tools implementing one of the three (!) existing tagging schemes. Not even simple things like destinations in different languages are compatible to the current scheme.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:50:28+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401379
Famlam (2025-03-16 19:04:22+00:00): Oeps, hier had ook bron BGT omtrekgericht bij moeten staan, voor de westelijke paden
Langlaeufer (2025-03-19 19:54:07+00:00): Hallo nh,
wenn der Radweg baulich erkennbar (farbliche Trennung, Einfädelspur und sogar Beschilderung rückwärts mit Radverkehr frei)  ist dann ist es ein Radweg solang er nicht durch Beschilderung zu etwas anderes gemacht wird. Ich hab es erstmal wieder zurückgedreht. Wenn sich der Zustand seit 2024 geändert hat, dann bin ich dir gerne behilflich den aktuellen Zustand zu erfassen.
Grüße Langläufer. 

Nochmal zu Info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren

und https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=397695790003061&focus=photo&lat=53.0158173&lng=14.0006325&z=17&x=0.45434508830198556&y=0.5740949110472725&zoom=0
ADFC_nh (2025-03-25 14:57:47+00:00): Hallo Langläufer, vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung und Klarstellung. Ich habe mich mit der Fragestellung noch mal beschäftigt und festgestellt, dass ich da auf dem falschen Dampfer war. Grüße nh
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:50:25+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401378
Taya_S (2025-03-16 17:45:44+00:00): Reverted vandalism by sockpuppet account.
See: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17404

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163699835
Jrachi (2025-03-17 09:31:02+00:00): Ciao.
Sto esaminando i tag usati sulle route hiking.
Premesso che una relazione rappresenta un percorso che fisicamente è costituito dalla segnaletica.
Esaminando la cronologia si vedono diversi cambiamenti, alcuni che sono da interpretare.
osmc:name non è documentato ma è usato dalla Reikarte (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSMC_Reitkarte) per il nome come deve essere visualizzato.
In questa relazione il nome è assente.

Nella prima versione c'era un ref=655 e operator=CAI
Nella versione 4 sparisce l'operator (era sbagliato o non è più l'operator del percorso, cambia poco), ed il ref diventa Ex 655.
Il cambio di ref è interpretabile con il suo decadimento.
In italiano si utilizza "ex" per specificare un qualcosa che era conosciuto come x ed ora ha un altro nome o significato.
Nella versione 7 il ref è diventato old_ref. Che senza un ref non capisco cosa significhi.
Nel 2015 versione 6 nascono osmc:name e osmc:symbol
entrambi creati dal ref con l'aggiunta del nome del torrente (che immagino dia il nome alla valle)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:abandoned:*
Sembra riferibile solo per oggetti fisici e non per elementi puramente virtuali.
Idem per disused

Insomma se volessi essere pignolo direi che la relazione è composta solo dall'essere una relazione senza nome, segnaletica o qualcosa che ne dichiari l'esistenza.

PS; non pensare che ce l'abbia con te, vorrei solo fare pulizia nel database e capire dove ci sono eccezioni valide.

Ivo
micheleOSM3 (2025-03-17 10:58:24+00:00): La cosa migliore è andare sul posto e vedere cosa c'è di reale ed eventualmente correggere i tag, ti consiglio di mettere un fixme così altri mappatori possono farlo.
Sul fatto che il tag disused è riferito solo ad oggetti fisici, non mi pare, il wiki fornisce un campo di applicazione abbastanza ampio, gli esempi sono solo esempi, si deve leggere il testo.
Jrachi (2025-03-17 11:08:26+00:00): Scusa, vedendo le informazioni dettagliate che hai inserito, sembrava tu fossi andato sul posto.
Come fai a mettere che è in disuso se non ci sei mai stato?

Ivo
micheleOSM3 (2025-03-19 14:50:51+00:00): è scritto in modo molto dettagliato nel commento del changeset, non lo hai letto?
Jrachi (2025-03-19 16:39:30+00:00): Ok.
Taya_S (2025-03-16 17:45:45+00:00): Reverted vandalism by sockpuppet account.
See: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17404

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163699835
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:50:23+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401377
evgenykatyshev (2025-03-17 13:11:11+00:00): Hello. I guess dead-end can't be one-way road, else how cars leave the road?
Madi-Red (2025-04-24 10:41:51+00:00): "Hello Umahi Emeka, thank You for your contribution. I have fixed validation error between crossing highways way 1368136051
way 1368136050. Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!"
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:50:20+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401372
vasony (2025-03-19 21:02:48+00:00): Szia Géza!

Sajnos a korábbi szerkesztő ilyen, mindent interpolál(t).
Viszont az ajtó számot légy szíves ne a házszámba tedd, hanem az addr:door mezőbe. Vagy ha nem egyértlemű mi az 1. akkor az addr:unit-ba

Tamás
Taya_S (2025-03-16 17:45:46+00:00): Reverted vandalism by sockpuppet account.
See: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17404

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163699835
Langlaeufer (2025-03-19 19:37:16+00:00): Hallo nh,
ich habe mal den nicht benutzungspflichtigen Radweg korrigiert. Er farblich getrennt gepflastert und nicht beschildert. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren
Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163699553
Langlaeufer (2025-03-19 19:37:24+00:00): Hallo nh,
ich habe mal den nicht benutzungspflichtigen Radweg korrigiert. Er farblich getrennt gepflastert und nicht beschildert. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren
Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163699553
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:50:17+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401369
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:50:15+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401366
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:50:12+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401365
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-16 17:50:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262585402

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
theDM (2025-03-17 17:01:04+00:00): Podobnych odcinków jest około 12 w całym kraju, nie licząc ekspresówek niekwalifikujących się pod motorway.
flex16 (2025-03-17 13:51:18+00:00): Hallo kartbratoffel,
bicycle=designated wird nur gesetzt, wenn Straßen speziell für das Radfahren bestimmt sind. Das sind in  Deutschland i.d.R. nur Wege, die mit dem Verkehrszeichen für die Rad- oder Rad- und Gehwege gekennzeichnet sind. Radrouten an sich sagen das nicht aus. Lies dazu bitte den entsprechenden Wikiartikel. Trifft das auf irgendeine Bearbeitung von dir zu? Ich bitte um Stellungnahme. Ansonsten würde ich die designated Tags wieder entfernen.
Viele Grüße
Flex16
kartbratoffel (2025-03-17 15:15:36+00:00): Hallo Flex16,
danke für den Hinweis. Der Weg wurde vor einigen Jahren als Radweg mit Landwirtschaftlicher Nutzung ausgebaut und hat auch den Charakter eines Radwegs. Daher würde er meiner Ansicht nach, wie im Wikiartikel beschrieben, unter "Feld- und Wirtschaftswege, die multifunktional genutzt werden" fallen.
Ob alle Abschnitte durchgehend als Radweg gekennzeichnet sind, kann ich leider nicht sicher sagen. Dafür müsste ich den Weg noch einmal abfahren.
flex16 (2025-03-17 16:05:45+00:00): Danke für deine Antwort! Leider bin ich aus dem Südkreis und kenne mich dort nicht aus. Stutzig wurde ich aber auch als du foot=designated an einen highway=unclassified getagged hast. Dass das da passt, kann ich mir beim besten Willen nicht vorstellen. :) Im Landkreis Fulda läuft ja (vorallem am Land) das Radnetz größtenteils über Feldwege. Jetzt z.B. jeden dieser Feldwege mit bicycle designated zu versehen würde ich jetzt nicht richtig finden. Unter diesen kombinierten Feld- und Radwegen verstehe ich eher diese Kombination vom Radweg-Verkehrszeichen mit dem Zusatzzeichen "Landwirt. Verkehr frei". Diese Tags von dir sind jetzt aber auch nicht so tragisch. Kannst ja da bei Gelegenheit nochmal schauen. Nur das foot=designated scheint mir offensichtlich falsch zu sei.
Viele Grüße
kartbratoffel (2025-03-17 16:31:28+00:00): Stimmt, das foot=designated war ein Versehen, habe den Tag wieder entfernt. Wenn Zeit und Wetter passen, werde ich mir die Beschilderung nochmal anschauen.
BCNorwich (2025-03-17 07:21:01+00:00): Hi, I can see no evidence of this very long boardwalk through the farmland meadow and parallel to the footpath. Does this boardwalk/path exist? It joins to a bridge (duplication of highway), and culvert (layer-1), which is impossible. Neither end joins the footpath network.

Could you please respond to the above remarks?

Regards Bernard.
Harveeymaps (2025-03-17 10:23:35+00:00): hi Bernard, I can confirm it exists as I helped build it. the boardwalk was built in the last year so satellite imagery is evidently not up to date, because of this I had to guess a little in regards to its exact position. the bridge is also not there anymore it is just the boardwalk.
gurglypipe (2025-03-17 13:24:25+00:00): @Harveeymaps I’d just like to say thanks for taking the time to update the map for things which you helped build, it’s fantastic to have this kind of local knowledge put on the map straight from the source :)
BCNorwich (2025-03-17 14:01:09+00:00): Hi, Thanks for responding. I've added layer=1 to the boardwalk and made the section that was a bridge part of the boardwalk maintaining the Right of Way tags on that section. I've also unjoined the boardwalk from the culvert.

Is any other part of the boardwalk also now the Right of Way and where does the boardwalk join the Right of Way at the SW end?  Also, the NE end of the boardwalk ends at a wall (on OSM), where I think is or was a gate, how does the boardwalk here join to the road or footpath?

Regards Bernard.
Harveeymaps (2025-03-17 20:03:27+00:00): Hi Bernard, I don’t know in regards to the Right of Way. 
At the NE end, I’ve just seen that I extended the boardwalk a bit far. I’ll remedy that now. Basically at that end, the existing footpath just runs along the beach and the boardwalk ends just before the beach starts.

At the SW end it would be quite hard to pin point exactly where the boardwalk ends as it is relatively random. I suppose it kind of takes the place of the footpath (the whole point of the boardwalk is that the footpath along there regularly floods)
It is also worth noting that there is a new fence running parallel to the boardwalk but it only goes halfway before turning up the field, splitting the field in two. Basically it would be very hard to accurately place both the new boardwalk and a few other features (including the fence), without updated satellite imagery.
Harveeymaps (2025-03-17 20:12:16+00:00): I’ve just tried to disconnect the boardwalk from the wall but don’t know how ( I’m relatively new to OSM) 
It actually hits the footpath 20m or so back. Could you either do this or tell me how? Thanks.
BCNorwich (2025-03-18 07:09:28+00:00): Hi, I've amended the NE end and added a note to the boardwalk asking for the ends to be checked.
Harveeymaps (2025-03-18 21:02:05+00:00): Thanks  bernard
eggie (2025-03-16 18:34:38+00:00): Hoi..

Je hebt Dotterhof 10 per abuis ergens anders heen gesleept.

Mvg
eggie
eggie (2025-03-16 18:36:55+00:00): Kijk even anders hier.. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=163700926
eggie (2025-03-17 07:33:15+00:00): adresnode hersteld
cyton (2025-03-21 18:16:59+00:00): oh, das war ja passend.
ich hatte mich grad vorbereitet die bäume, etc. in der hohenheimer zu prüfen mit SCEE, dabei hatte ich die fehlenden gehwege gesehen, und wollte die auch eintragen.

du kannst in frohnau sehr gut die alten "straßenbefahrung 2014" daten nehmen bei den gehwegen, die sind da noch aktuell genug.

ich hab sowieso vor hier alle bäume und alternen mal zu importieren, wenn da was falsch ist mit den gehwegen merk ich das hoffentlich.
mcliquid (2025-03-17 07:34:24+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
limes11 (2025-03-17 07:43:58+00:00): Hi spaceshipguy,

adding to the previous comments, please use meaningful descriptions for your changesets. Giving all changesets the same - practically useless - title makes it hard to review.

Thank you
spaceshipguy (2025-03-17 09:29:27+00:00): If course, didn't wanted to have changes on both continents in the set. I will look after it in the future.
CoyKoi (2025-03-16 23:06:08+00:00): Hi blandchipsss, welcome to OSM and thank you for your edits.

The pathway should connect to the road line (highway feature), so that it connects to the network.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163701951
mcliquid (2025-03-17 08:19:52+00:00): Hallo, warum hast du die Abschnitte mit unterschiedlichen Oberflächen einfach gelöscht?
mcliquid (2025-04-19 07:22:28+00:00): This changeset was reverted, see comment above.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165140587
TrickyFoxy (2025-03-17 10:03:50+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163724084
TrickyFoxy (2025-03-17 10:04:33+00:00): Не рисуйте фиктивные объекты
rohieb (2025-10-20 11:19:56+00:00): Was wollte ich der Allgemeinheit mit diesem Changeset-Kommentar mitteilen…? 🤔
literan (2025-03-17 21:02:52+00:00): это не название. Название Москвы - это "Москва", а не "город". Понимаете, что такое имя собственное?

и зачем удалили тег direction? это вовсе вандализм
iSphinx (2025-03-17 21:20:09+00:00): Без тега name точка не появляется в результатах поиска. Это плохо. Предложите более осмысленное название.