piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2024-06-23 13:31:11+00:00): Yes - there is no infrastructure there behond an "H" and a few warning signs on the surrounding fencing.  By all means change it.
DavidFactChex (2024-06-22 22:59:29+00:00): Newest changeset
DavidFactChex (2024-06-22 23:00:11+00:00): Absolutely newest CS
Florek89 (2024-06-29 14:37:40+00:00): Aż żal mi tego mojego landuse XD
syntex (2024-06-29 16:28:39+00:00): Na szczęście większości nie płotowałeś, więc nie ma tragedii xD
CurlingMan13 (2024-09-20 22:00:46+00:00): Ponds and water ways should be added as areas/ways, and not nodes
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 11:41:58+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153048783
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-23 23:16:11+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153088719
felipeeugenio (2024-06-23 13:57:05+00:00): Hola. Escribimos con capitalización normal. No mayúsculas.
saludos
ZeLonewolf (2024-06-23 11:22:58+00:00): I've reverted this per private access restrictions described by residents as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rhode_Island/Hog_Island
Please open a discussion on https://community.openstreetmap.org/ before making further changes to private roads. Linked map on the prior changeset does not have any indication of access restrictions.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153063260
emersonveenstra (2024-06-24 11:25:21+00:00): Hi there,

Thanks for the update! A couple of things: If you look at the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=disc%20golf%20course?uselang=en#Common_mapping_pitfalls), baskets and tees don't have a name or ref tag, and you still need to add a leisure=disc_golf_course node with all the information on it, since very few consumers understand the disc_golf_course relation type.

Also, i think you forgot to add tags to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11993139634

Hope this helps!
Zandu (2024-06-24 13:54:01+00:00): Hi, thanks for the note. It was a multi-stage process and I tagged the tees and baskets before I connected them with holes. I wondered about needing to remove the names from the nodes. Thanks for pointing that out. The untagged node is only to show that the hole has to go around the water tower. It is in the middle of the hole way and therefore does not have any tags.

As for your point on the leisure=disc_golf_course node, do you mean I should add that to a central point (or the test basket at the start of the course) in addition to listing it on the relation? I think that's what you're saying. I will do that. 

Thanks for checking my work and improving the map and making me a better mapper of disc golf areas. :)
emersonveenstra (2024-06-25 11:58:01+00:00): You're welcome! For the leisure=disc_golf_course node, it's probably best to have it be a standalone node, but it's fine to have it on a basket.
Joseph R P (2024-06-26 06:21:17+00:00): Hello, while it is perfectly acceptable to have traffic signal nodes placed on the intersection nodes (especially if you're adding them for the first time in a very quick edit), it is more accurate and representative of which roads/part of the roads are affected with the traffic signals on the stop lines, especially to routing systems that recognize traffic signals. This is especially important for four-way intersections along divided roadways. Generally, it is better to move signals to the more complex configuration than vice versa when possible.
Liongrass (2024-06-23 05:30:25+00:00): The correct way would have been to not remove the tags, but to set them to `no` and update the survey date. Thank you for the edits, though
Rockedf (2024-07-01 14:40:59+00:00): Thanks for the suggestion my friend. It will be taken into account. Thanks for your edits and for keeping the map updated. Best regards.
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 04:45:03+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153050871
Emdier (2024-06-23 02:45:25+00:00): Fix: add ramps
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-06-25 10:15:21+00:00): Chào bạn, sao bạn downgrade đường vô tội vạ vậy? Đều là những trục đường nối dài liên quận trong list mà?
Warin61 (2025-04-02 06:36:59+00:00): Hi,
The tracks in the Blue Mts National Park would allow access to parks maintenance and fire vehicles. So might be better tagged access=no, motorvehicle=private, and some foot=yes, bicycle=yes.
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 04:13:25+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153051204
AmyCupcake (2024-06-23 07:23:50+00:00): Badly pretending you're french doesn't hide your "locale=es" tag, ban evader.
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 04:11:12+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153051485
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 04:08:34+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153051556
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-06-23 04:11:28+00:00): Hi  Sajeevini, Nice to have you reviewed. But why does my changeset popup to get your eye to let you review? Just curious.
RedGreenBlue09 (2024-06-23 06:50:58+00:00): I think you can visit https://osmcha.org or use the "History" feature to get all recent changesets.
tyfi (2024-06-23 03:26:33+00:00): There was a bridge wrongly mapped on a gravel road, and two bridges were missed on a parallel railway line. I also mapped in the drainage ditches to be more explicit to prevent this from happening again.
tyfi (2024-06-23 03:40:25+00:00): Don't know what kinds of trees, but they've got a bunch of them. Looks like a private property, not a open business
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 04:03:53+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153051923
citrula (2024-06-23 04:51:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions. You can press "Q" to square the corners of objects you draw. Also, you can use landuse=greenfield or landuse=brownfield for empty plots, without a name tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153052136
i2004 (2024-06-23 13:06:45+00:00): te deje para que me ordenes la linea 176
martien-176 (2024-08-05 17:44:24+00:00): Hi Mercy, you added level tags to waterways. Maybe to prevent conflict with crossing highways (?)

Level tags are not used for waterways. Better to use layer instead in combination with bridge or culvert. Or ford, without layer.

Btw, the level tag is added to a whole stretch of waterway. Be aware that after removing the tag validation tools will detect incorrect crossings with other features.

Best regards, Martien (HOT Global Validator)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153052535
Leo Slager (2024-06-23 15:55:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-06-23 15:57:33+00:00): Feedback:

Het hotel stond al uitgebreid op de kaart.
Een dubbele vermelding is natuurlijk niet de bedoeling.
Ik zal je bijdrage weer verwijderen.
petajalanterbuka (2025-09-23 06:28:30+00:00): Hi. I don't think you should add things like "(coming soon)" to the name.

Either make it a construction and/or put it in the description=* tag
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 13:16:54+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153053182
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 13:13:43+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153053207
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-11 17:43:02+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12002014229/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
mueschel (2024-06-24 09:51:27+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM.
You uploaded a large number of short streets on top of existing ones. 
When editing, please  make sure that you always change the old objects and don't add new ones additionally.
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 13:46:48+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153053861
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 13:52:29+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153053861
emersonveenstra (2024-06-24 11:06:34+00:00): Hi there,

This changeset broke https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002512255, could you please fix it? Thanks!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-18 09:45:52+00:00): "Name Board Fhss" - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12002151967/history

is it a board with name "Fhss"?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-02 22:54:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4787652
Kovoschiz (2024-06-23 09:09:10+00:00): Please don't directly delete them, as they represent a shop space, and may have addresses or other info. It causes more work to add back new tenants later, and waste previous user's effort. Please change it to a plain "point" to eliminate it.
Kovoschiz (2024-06-23 09:09:53+00:00): Please don't directly delete them, as they represent a shop space, and this does have addresses or other info. It causes more work to add back new tenants later, and waste previous user's effort. Please change it to a plain "point" to eliminate it.
NeisBot (2024-06-23 07:48:24+00:00): Hi 1990Ma, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1295175070

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-27 20:46:25+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153265828
Fizzie-DWG (2024-08-24 03:26:52+00:00): Reverted by DWG - use of unauthorised or unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155678240
gurglypipe (2024-06-23 20:38:18+00:00): Hiya, thanks for your helpful contributions around Cockermouth recently. When editing access tagging for things, can you please read the OSM wiki for guidance on the tagging though? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access_provisions_in_the_United_Kingdom

access=no specifically means that no physical access is possible to anyone, regardless of whether they have permission.

The correct tagging here is access=private. I have corrected it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153085001
Wildcat77 (2024-06-24 08:32:37+00:00): Thanks for that. I had read that document but it concentrates on routes with access and not private ones like the one you identified. I have corrected a few others I had incorrectly tagged and shall endeavour to get them right in future.
gurglypipe (2024-06-24 08:35:47+00:00): That’s great, thanks a lot, and happy editing! It’s nice to see someone putting effort into the map around Cockermouth
goodidea (2026-02-13 23:10:06+00:00): Kleine Anmerkung zu deinen Änderungen bei LUUC, die mir heute aufgefallen sind: ein Leerzeichen nach dem Semikolon bei wheelchair:description=2 Stufen am Eingang;Außenbereich barrierefrei zu entfernen, ist nicht wirklich korrekt gewesen ... das ist kein Semikolon für einen Mehrfach-Tag, sondern ein normales Semikolon in einem beschreibenden Text (könnte z.B. auch ein Komma sein oder ein Gedankenstrich)! Ich habe es nochmal ergänzt ... Man sollte da immer genau hinschauen.

Und warum nicht payment:cash=no hinzugefügt, wenn LUUC kein Bargeld akzeptiert? Das wäre doch dann eine nicht unwichtige Information (wenn der Änderungssatz schon so heißt) ...

Viele Grüße!
NeisBot (2024-06-23 08:42:24+00:00): Hi Kotaro429, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/way/1295191577
https://osm.org/way/1295191576
https://osm.org/way/551241794

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-23 08:49:53+00:00): Thanks for your mapped beaches.
Looks good!

#HappyMapping
Scout Jens (2024-06-27 09:40:30+00:00): access = yes würde bedeuten, dass dort Alle fahren können. Das passt wohl nicht, wenn ich mich richtig erinnere
Lachmönch (2024-06-27 12:56:05+00:00): Die Straße ist jetzt auf voller Breite asphaltiert, da kann wirklich alles fahren.
Die Sperrschilder stehen allerdings immer noch da (25.6.24) als ob man vergessen hätte sie wegzuräumen. Muss man da jetzt eine restriction eintragen?
Scout Jens (2024-08-08 11:04:27+00:00): Ich denke, dass der Zugang für Fahrzeuge aus landwirtschaftlichen Verkehr beschränkt ist. Die südwestlichen Wege dorthin haben noch die Beschränkung, dass überhaupt garkeine Fahrzeuge dort fahren dürfen. Dass passt halt nicht zusammen.
BCNorwich (2024-06-23 09:16:05+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap, a live worldwide database from which thousands of maps are compiled. As such fiction or test data can only do harm, if only at a very minor level. Thus I've reverted this changeset. Please feel free to add genuine data.

Regards Bernard.
pitfire (2024-06-23 09:59:26+00:00): Hi mame982

Name Markt ist eine Beschreibung. 
(Name des Marktes wird nur erfasst, wenn er einen Eigenname hat.) Siehe auch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=marketplace?uselang=de#Darstellung
mame982 (2024-06-23 12:35:15+00:00): Okay, dass war mir nicht klar, danke für den Hinweis!

Das heißt, wenn die ortsübliche Bezeichnung auch einfach "Markt" ist, wird nichts erfasst?
pitfire (2024-06-24 04:00:50+00:00): Parken ist offensichtlich die überwiegende Nutzung. Daher nur mit amenity=parking die temporäre Nutzung  kennzeichnen. Der Marktplatz kommt nur als Knoten mit den Öffnungszeiten auf diesen Platz. Key:amenity ist der primäre Tag, um nützliche und wichtige Einrichtungen (amenity engl. Annehmlichkeit) für Besucher und Anwohner in die Karte einzupflegen und hat in diesem Fall keinen Eigenname.
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 12:29:33+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153058573
bwbuz (2024-11-04 18:45:48+00:00): Hallo McPomHH, du hast mit diesem Änderungssatz u. a. eine wohl temporäre Haltestelle eingerichtet, deren Existenz anscheinend nicht mehr gegeben ist: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4336445
Hast du da einen Sachstand dazu?
VG
McPomHH (2024-11-18 20:17:10+00:00): Hallo, ich bin nicht vor Ort. Laut Veröffentlichung soll die monatelange Baustelle ab Anfang 2025 der Vergangenheit angehören, dann müsste die neue Haltestellenlage gemappt werden. Mehr Informationen habe ich nicht dazu.
CurlingMan13 (2025-02-05 04:11:30+00:00): Changeset reverted.  These are residential roads, not living streets.  Living streets are very rare in the US.
See:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street#United_States

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162149602
LuxuryCoop (2024-06-23 09:36:17+00:00): 직사각형 건물을 그리실 때 단축키 Q를 이용하면 건물을 정확한 직사각형 모양으로 만들 수 있습니다!
Santi2222 (2024-07-02 08:02:11+00:00): Hola, el etiquetado que corresponde a la parcela entre avenida de Zabalgana y avenida del Mediterráneo es landuse=brownfield.
Kinis (2024-07-18 21:10:22+00:00): Hola, Santi2222.

¿Por qué? Yo lo que veo en esa parcela son unas grúas enormes y dos edificios en construcción, de los que ya han levantado 6 pisos.
Santi2222 (2024-07-28 17:36:18+00:00): Los edificios construidos están ya en el mapa, pero el resto de la parcela sigue siendo un descampado. En todo caso, si hay una zona en la que hay obras debería etiquetarse con landuse=construction.
stasiu512 (2024-12-25 00:21:37+00:00): Cześć, to nie jest nazwa urzędowa. Zmieniłem na man_made=pier.
Pozdrawiam
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 12:21:24+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153059877
sheldonelectric (2024-12-17 16:51:55+00:00): Δηλαδή ανοίγει κάθε μέρα, κυριακές και αργίες; από τα μεσάνυχτα μέχρι τις 12 το μεσημέρι;;;
Yitzchak M (2024-10-10 03:16:13+00:00): היי. מפה רשמית של רמת הנדיב (למרות שהיא קצת ישנה) מראה את הצבע של השביל הזה כ "צהוב". זה לא הגיוני שיהיה עוד "כתום" בנוסף ל "שביל המצוק". אולי הוא באמת "צהוב"?
https://www.ramat-hanadiv.org.il/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/%D7%9E%D7%A4%D7%AA-%D7%A4%D7%90%D7%A8%D7%A7-%D7%94%D7%98%D7%91%D7%A2-%D7%90%D7%A0%D7%92%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%AA.pdf
hatul (2024-10-10 19:37:37+00:00): לא, הלכתי בו והוא בוודאות מסומן בשטח בכתום. שים לב שיש גם עוד כמה שבילים צהובים במפה. אני לא יודע מה הסימון שלהם בשטח אבל זה מראה שכל הסימון בפארק הוא בעייתי ומבלבל.
יש גם הבדל בין שבילי אופניים כמו שביל המצוק לשבילים רגליים.
Yitzchak M (2024-10-11 02:33:39+00:00): בסדר גמור!
לפני שנה נתתי לעצמי פרויקט והלכתי בכל השבילים, הליכה ורכיבה, שהיו במפה (זה לקח הרבה טיולי יום), חוץ משבילים במפה הזו שמסומן בצהוב. התכוונתי לחזור בהזדמנות ולברר מה זה. תודה לך. חסכת לי נסיעה מתל אביב. 😄 כל היתר השבילים (שלא צהוב) הם מדויקים במפה שלנו, אחרת אם היו שינויים בתוך השנה הקודמת.
שתהיה לך שנה טובה ושקט וטיולים נעימים!
hatul (2024-10-11 06:41:53+00:00): כל הכבוד לך על הטיולים והמיפוי. רמת הנדיב יפה מאוד אז תמיד שווה לך לחזור.
גמר חתימה טובה.
Yitzchak M (2024-10-11 07:20:20+00:00): נכון! אתה צודק! האמת היא שרציתי לחזור ולעשות את המסלול החדש של שביל ישראל. 😉
conradoos (2024-07-07 21:04:56+00:00): Cześć, w tym zestawie zmian zduplikowałeś drogi, np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1295225689, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1295231229
RCRalph (2024-07-07 21:09:42+00:00): Sorki, już naprawiam. Relatify czasem tak ma że duplikuje. Good catch :3
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 13:05:12+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153060445
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 12:57:20+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153060575
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-23 10:20:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12002596718
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/343415198

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
qaz789 (2024-06-23 11:36:25+00:00): Poprawione w changesecie:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153063698
NorthCrab (2024-06-24 10:58:45+00:00): Dzięki!
grzegorz75jan (2024-06-23 11:01:38+00:00): Te boiska nie istnieją. Tak to wyglądało jeszcze w tym miesiącu https://postimg.cc/62qxvc9P
One były tylko tymczasowo. Ma być dalsza rozbudowa tego obiektu.
Piotr Strębski (2024-06-23 11:06:17+00:00): czyli jest kryta trybuna, ale boisk do siatkówki plażowej i do piłki nie ma? :O To na co ludzie mają patrzeć z trybuny? :D
grzegorz75jan (2024-06-23 11:10:17+00:00): https://tarnow.net.pl/articles/s/i/473141
grzegorz75jan (2024-06-23 11:10:38+00:00): https://tarnow.naszemiasto.pl/tarnow-z-upragnionym-dofinansowaniem-na-rozbudowe-stadionu/ar/c1-9719185
Piotr Strębski (2024-06-23 11:17:28+00:00): zostawiłem tylko to "boisko" piasczyste naprzeciwko trybuny, to poniżej przerobiłem na trawnik
Piotr Strębski (2024-06-23 11:20:39+00:00): czy ten teren ma w ogole ogrodzenie? bo widac tylko to, co nanioslem
grzegorz75jan (2024-06-23 11:32:22+00:00): Co do boiska. Tam jest tylko łąka tak jak na moim zdjęciu oraz te z artykułów. Chwilę temu były tam igrzyska europejskie i na ten moment były te boiska. Teraz trawsko aż ruszą z rozbudową.

Ogrodzenie tylko w obrębie trybun i parkingu tak jak na orto.

Chwilę temu robiłem tam masakrę bo jeden upiększacz "udziwnił" mapę. Przy stadionie żużlowym kasowałem jak szalony a sporo zostało bo nawet budki przy ogrodzeniu to już zabytek. Fakt, że sporo rzeczy w Mościcach dodał ale to co pokaleczył (częściowo albo źle trafił i mapował na starym podkładzie albo nie użył nowszego) to nie mam siły bo widziałem też parę innych jego edycji w innych obszarach. 

Ogólnie w Tarnowie trzeba ostrożnie bo trochę dłubią i dłubać będą np. niedługo ruszy przebudowa ul. Tuchowskiej. Orto świeże ale nie zawsze pokazuje wszystko aktualne.
Piotr Strębski (2024-06-23 19:21:25+00:00): Pozostawiłem na mapie "ślady" po tych boiskach, bo ktoś inny - nieznając naszych ustaleń - ich z powrotem nie wrysował. Ślady nie będą się wyświetlać i nie będą się indeksować jako obiekty, ale dla każdego edytującego mapę będą stosownie widoczne.
Ponieważ jest tak tu problematycznie, to skoro interesują Cię poprawki na tym obszarze to może dawaj pojedyncze, jednostkowe uwagi w każdym miejscu co trzeba usunąć/dodać itd. I jak punkt po punkcie będzie się to realizować.
Allroads (2024-06-23 16:50:35+00:00): emergency ambulance-station is bedoeld voor human, medical, en dan ook nog voor directe hulp.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aemergency%3Dambulance_station

Het onderscheid moet er wel zijn tussen human en animal.

Die informatieve value's geven geen wereldwijde duidelijkheid.
Een bepaald key/value moet men gebruiken, maar welke?
Dit is weer een verruiming van een tag dat negatieve gevolgen heeft.
Data vervuiling.

Het moet meer iets zijn van animal rescue.

animal_rescue_service
Bij overture zijn ze ook nog zoekend
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overture_categories
Dillen GJ (2024-06-25 12:47:24+00:00): Ik snap je reactie, daarom het object aangepast, liever niet zichtbaar omdat er nog geen officiële definitie is dan data vervuiling !
Enock4seth (2024-11-13 11:13:17+00:00): Hi Zuliatu,
Thanks for mapping. Kindly download existing data before adding new ones to avoid overlapping and duplicate features as in this case. I have deleted all duplicates from this changeset.