piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mga_geo (2023-06-02 09:29:06+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi persistez-vous à découper les ronds-points ?
Marc
Anton_Klebanovich (2023-06-08 07:42:55+00:00): Bonjour! Merci pour vos commentaires. Rond-point de reconstruction à sens unique https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137083618
Hello! Thanks for your feedback. Reconstruction roundabout as one way https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137083618
phodgkin (2024-10-21 20:37:53+00:00): I'm confused by some of the access tagging around Ormesby Hall. In particular, the service road leading onto Church Lane is tagged as "motor_vehicle=permissive". But the signage on the ground quite clearly states "Delivery and staff access only" (i.e. "motor_vehicle=delivery"). This is leading to some incorrect routing - we were directed to the wrong entrance.
Frans S (2023-06-02 10:31:22+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not  in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Multiple buildings have been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136859869
user_5359 (2023-06-02 11:47:09+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.oms.org/way/708418942. What is the meaning of the tag Building = yes? To correct the building = construction only change the value construction to yes.
jeslop (2023-06-02 10:30:00+00:00): Lo vuelvo a cambiar una vez más:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas_en_Espa%C3%B1a#Name_con_abreviaturas

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
jeslop (2023-06-02 17:08:35+00:00): Reverted on changeset 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136862251
aceman444 (2023-06-02 09:51:44+00:00): Mozno by nezaskodilo uvadzat zdroj.
RZBİLGİSAYAR (2023-09-12 13:41:26+00:00): BU İŞLET AÇIKTIR
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-02 09:51:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Św. Jacka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945858240
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945858241
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945858242
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945858249
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945858250
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945858251
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945858252
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945858253
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945858254
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945858255
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945858256
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945858257
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945858258
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945858259
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945858260
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945858261
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945858262
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945858263
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885120
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885121
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885122
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885123
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885124
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885125
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885126
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885127
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885128
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885129
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885130
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885131
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885132
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885133
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885134
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885135
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885136
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885137
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885138
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885139
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885140
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885141
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885142
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885143
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885144
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885145
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885146
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885147
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885148
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885149
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885150
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885151
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885152
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885153
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885154
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885155
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885156
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885157
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885158
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945885160

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck (2023-06-02 09:56:43+00:00): Genaues Ende des Privatwegs im Westen ist unklar, für die Schranke im Osten wurden Fotos geschickt. Ebenfalls unklar der Status der vom Privatweg jetzt abzweigenden Sackgassen-Tracks. Wenn jemand vor Ort ist und das präzisieren kann, bitte gerne!
Mar4s (2023-06-13 15:00:53+00:00): Hi, you have created cycleways, that overlap already existing ways. Would you fix that? One of the examples is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178279510#map=18/49.55115/16.31383

Thanks
Mar4s (2023-06-13 15:02:43+00:00): Let me know, if you need help. If Czech is better for you, feel free to use it.
Elisabeth IRM-RV (2023-07-03 08:01:17+00:00): Halo w_djatmiko,
Terima kasih sudah berkontribusi menambahkan data di OSM!
Saat ini saya sedang melakukan remote mapping untuk update nama desa di provinsi jawa tengah dengan menggunakan data nama desa terbaru dari BIG.
Saya ingin mengkonfirmasi terkait changset anda yaitu: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/1308656312
anda menghapus Desa Sukolilan 
dan pada changeset https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/10945918098
anda membuat Desa Sukolilan Satu.

Berdasarkan data BIG (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KMTOFCo8h3yxq7YwIwHrZk3chel-8ZNC/view), Desa Sukolilan satu tidak ada, namun adanya Desa Sukolilan. 
apakah anda memiliki sumberlain yang lebih valid mengenai penamaan desa tersebut?

saya sangat mengapresiasi apapun informasi yang kamu berikan.
Terima kasih
w_djatmiko (2023-07-03 10:23:34+00:00): Nama dusun tersebut dari 
Peta bakosurtanal 1409-212 mbak
Elisabeth S (2023-07-04 02:34:30+00:00): jika demikian, baiknya tambahkan keterangan peta bakosultanal sebagai sumber/source.

peta bakosurtanal yang dipakai apakah dalam bentuk shp?
Elisabeth S (2023-07-04 06:53:24+00:00): apakah Peta bakosurtanal 1409-212 yang di maksud adalah ediri I-2001 (https://tanahair.indonesia.go.id/portal-web/downloadpetacetak?skala=25K)?
kwiatek_123 (2023-07-26 14:06:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3790275
syntex (2025-07-27 11:50:40+00:00): tak
Filip009 (2023-12-30 09:18:49+00:00): Hello, I think you created a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26864346
DP24PH (2023-06-02 10:34:48+00:00): This changeset modifies the earlier changeset 118738424 defect as described: FPJ Avenue etymology attributes fixes

Special thanks to @Danysan95 for the hotfix contribution.

Best regards,


DP24
pitscheplatsch (2023-06-04 10:50:32+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136862889
pitscheplatsch (2023-06-04 10:50:39+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136862854
kapazao (2023-06-02 21:15:07+00:00): Hola, ¿puedes explicar esto?
¿Qué adaptación con Catastro, por qué no miras las imágenes por satélite y la realidad?
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136863147
lisa234234235 (2023-06-03 22:59:33+00:00): Hola, 
el camino que se ve por satélite esta cortado en la actualidad. Hablé con el propietario de esta parcela y me informó que es un camino privado. Se ve en catastro que el camino público va por el otro lado del barranco. 
Un saludo!
kapazao (2023-06-11 08:40:54+00:00): Hola, está bien, esto habría quedado mejor explicado en el conjunto de cambios para evitar confusiones, ya que cualquiera que lo vea no va a entenderlo si no se explica.
Supongo que cuando actualicen este año las imágenes por satélite debería verse más claro.
Gracias por la respuesta y actualizar el mapa.
Un saludo
jaap de vries (2023-06-02 13:05:33+00:00): Je geeft brandgangen, achtergangen weer dit ook zo graag aangeven want het zijn geen voetpaden waar iedereen zomaar overheen kan en soms is er een poort aanwezig.
cartofy (2023-06-06 13:38:17+00:00): This is a relation. It's right there. Read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation

Please remove the fixme, it does not need to be fixed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136863612
HikeAndMap (2023-06-03 22:12:28+00:00): Hi there, thank you for your contributions.

May I ask you when you make changes all over the globe - to upload your changes before you move on to another area/country/province so we all, you included, can easier keep track of what we're all doing?

Thank you for your kind consideration to be a bit more mindful to fellow mappers :)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136863665
silversurfer83 (2023-06-04 04:04:31+00:00): Hello 
I would like to add the following links to our wiki. These will give you a great start as to how your contributions might be of even greater use to the project. 

Happy Mapping 
Silversurfer83 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a
kenken234 (2023-06-19 17:16:22+00:00): Can someone revert this node (1838456031) to the previous version? This edit moved it and it is definitely off. It is at Singapore Changi Airport T2 and I've added a note on the map as well
Cebderby (2023-06-25 23:27:35+00:00): Node 1838456031 drag reverted in my ch. 137769082
balint36 (2023-06-06 19:22:45+00:00): Szia!
Rákosrendezőn a D38-as vágány részben járható. Valahol egy ponton talpfákat állítottak keresztbe, onnantól használhatatlan. Viszont a D38-on kívül más vágányokat is használtnak jelöltél annak ellenére, azok meg vannak már bontva, így az "abandoned" címke azoknál a helyes. A D38-at sem a megfelelő hosszban jelölted használtnak, mert csak a keresztbe állított talpfákig az, viszont azok helyét én sem tudom beazonosítani.

A módosítás során más vágányokra is elhelyeztél "industrial" címkéket, azonban ez a címkézés nem helytálló, mert többségben nem iparvágányokra raktad, hanem állomási rakodó vágányokra.
balint36 (2023-06-25 16:44:43+00:00): Ezt remekül megbeszéltük.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-04 06:53:41+00:00): Split location out of name=* and upgraded social media to HTTPS for SEO spam POI French Florist - Orange County in changeset 183627472

https://osm.org/changeset/183627472
user_19471059 (2023-06-04 17:10:23+00:00): بلوار پردیس
Syl (2023-07-07 11:06:57+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé cette modification, une salle de SNT est trop spécifique pour pouvoir être ajouté, et une ligne de car était modifié de façon incorrecte.
HikeAndMap (2023-06-03 22:14:06+00:00): Hi there, may I ask you to please be a bit more mindful to the mapping community - by uploading your changes before moving on to the next country/area so edits are flagged only in the area where they're actually happening and not flagged as edits all over the world.

This to ensure we all, you yourself included, can easily follow up and keep track on what we're all doing?

Thank you for your thoughtful considerations :)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136864461
jaap de vries (2023-06-02 13:07:56+00:00): Blijkbaar ben je weer met gras bezig zonder te reageren op eerdere berichten. Ook hier loopt het gras over bestrating heen.
flother (2023-06-21 17:33:03+00:00): Hi, was this just a popup thing? The website no longer exists and I can't find any info about this online.
maraf24 (2023-06-17 07:27:10+00:00): Dlaczego skasowałeś fixme z https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107387845 ?
Przejścia na pewno nie ma w tym miejscu, w którym jest na osm, więc fixme jest zasadne jak i nadal aktualne.
danvyr (2023-06-17 09:27:24+00:00): Mieszkam tam.  Codziennie chodzę tą drogą
danvyr (2023-06-17 09:28:51+00:00): nie wierz mi, przyjdź i zobacz
maraf24 (2023-06-17 11:18:39+00:00): Odpowiedź nie na temat.
Langlaeufer (2023-06-02 13:17:41+00:00): genau genommen ist es hier schiefgegangen. Der weg ist zu einer Wiese geworden. Kannst du mal schauen ob es jetzt so ist, wie du es haben wolltest.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136866282
Langlaeufer (2023-06-02 13:06:01+00:00): Irgendwas ist hier jetzt kaput gegangen. Du wolltest einen Pfad von der Brombergstr zum Hubertusweg einzeichnen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136866385
FatMo (2023-06-02 13:21:57+00:00): Ja, genau. Hab leider erst nach dem hochladen der Änderung gesehen, dass ich was kaputt gemacht habe. Tut mir Leid, ich übe noch.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136866385
Langlaeufer (2023-06-02 13:41:54+00:00): Alles gut. Kann passieren.  ggf. jemand um Hilfe bitten, wenn etwas schief gegangen ist. z.B. im Forum unter community.openstreetmap.org.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136866385
Kovoschiz (2023-06-03 07:57:20+00:00): What has changed about the constructions?
Fjana (2023-10-01 16:52:35+00:00): Zdravím! Muzejní dráha (relace 15351917) je zachovaná vlečka, která je využívána jako muzejní dráha. Toto je definice pro railway=preserved.
Domnívám se, že tato úprava je chybná, mohl byste prosím vysvětlit vaše důvody (je možné, že se mýlím já)?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15351917
vasony (2023-06-09 13:19:07+00:00): Szia!

Mi a Rákóczi Ferenc utca -> II. Rákóczi Ferenc utcanév átírásának forrása/oka?

Tamás
Pocokkifli (2023-06-11 10:42:45+00:00): Kedves Tamás,

Az újabb utcanév tábla alapján indultam ki (Isis irodaház oldalán van felhelyezve), ahol ott van a teljes név, a régebbi zománc táblákon van csak szimplán Rákócziként. Továbbá ez a történelmi személy hivatalos neve. Többféle szervezet, cég használja az egyik, vagy a másik változatot a címében. Ugyanakkor szombathely.hu-n található műszaki térinformatikai rendszerének térképén is az egyszerűsített név szerepel. Ha van egyértelműbb forrás, indok, akkor szükségesnek látom az előző változathoz való visszatérést.

Köszönöm!

Üdvözlettel,
Pocokkifli
vasony (2023-06-12 05:46:00+00:00): Szia!

Az utca neve az ahogy a határozatban elnevezték, sokszor ennek nincs köze, hogy hogyan hívják hivatalosan a személyt (illetve régebben még a földrajzinév-bizottság is javasolta az előtagok elhagyását).

Openstreetmapre az utcatábla alapján visszük fel, ha ezek nem egyeznek, akkor lehet mérlegelni. Mivel nem vagyok helyi, nem tudom ez a II. Rákóczi Ferences utcatábla mennyire hivatalos.

Én megnéztem a földhivatalban és a , minden ingatlan címe Rákóczi Ferenc. A választási címjegyzékben szintén. Ha a 
a régi zománctáblák többsége is még ezt támasztja alá, akkor visszaírnám. Most az a helyzet hogy az utca neve és a házszámokban lévő cím nem egyezik, ami semmiképp nem jó.
alt_name-be lehet tenni a II. Rákóczi Ferenc-et

Tamás


Tamás
Pocokkifli (2023-06-12 07:06:54+00:00): Javítottam, ahogy javasoltad az alt_name-mel.
vasony (2023-06-12 08:39:31+00:00): A Batthány tér körforgalomnál még maradt 2 szakasz, nem akarok belepiszkálni, hogy ne akadjuk össze.
Pocokkifli (2023-06-12 09:29:55+00:00): Köszi, javítva + a hiányzó elágazások pótolva a körforgalomnál
Kristjan ESPERANTO (2023-06-27 19:31:31+00:00): Hallo AngieGab :-) Warum hast du das "Sao Mai" in "Leipziger Straße" umbenannt? Da die Änderung für mich nicht schlüssig ist, habe ich sie rückgängig gemacht.
FajrAl (2026-07-09 14:59:23+00:00): Ini kan permukiman, bukan bumi perkemahan.
Linerly (2026-07-09 15:06:03+00:00): Iya, tapi dekat sama perkemahan waktu survei dulu... Apa ada yang salah?
FajrAl (2026-07-09 15:12:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178309132 gunakan landuse=residential. 

Untuk Desa Wisata Pulesari bisa dibuat ke node; gunakan tourism=attraction dan place=hamlet.

Untuk tempat kemah, juga gunakan node: tourism=camp_site dan name=Lapangan Kemah Desa Wisata Pulesari, info lainnya berkenan kemah juga bisa ditambahkan di sini.
Dodko (2023-06-03 15:48:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178309684
Treba si prečítať dokumentáciu, je to zastaralá značka.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport=shooting%20range
Iris Amalia Fernández (2023-06-02 15:50:04+00:00): Está mal escrito el nombre. Intenté cambiarlo y lo hice poniendo nombre al edificio.
La universidad se llama Universidad Nacional de José Clemente Paz ("clemente", no "clemante").
muralito (2023-06-02 21:13:53+00:00): OK. Ahi quedó. La verdad no revise el nombre en si, sino los vínculos entre los distintos elementos y datos el sentido de OSM. Por eso te decía lo del edificio, que si tiene nombre, y lo conoces, podes agregarlo que está bien.
Iris Amalia Fernández (2023-06-02 21:27:57+00:00): Claro. No, no creo que tenga nombre el edificio. Del cuadrado anaranjado que está marcado ahora, hay edificios que no pertenecen a la Universidad. El de la esquina es el Centro de Estudios Municipales, está la biblioteca de UNPAZ, y una escuela primaria. Voy a buscar más información para seguir aportando. Yo trabajo en UNPAZ.
muralito (2023-06-03 02:14:25+00:00): Estarían muy buenos esos aportes. Se valoran mucho los que hace cada mapeador local que conoce bien cada lugar, de primera mano, y con las cosas actualizadas. El resto aportamos lo que podemos desde una silla.
rskedgell (2023-06-02 14:39:25+00:00): Are you sure you wanted to change the footway area into a linear (and routeable) footway around its perimeter?
EnglandEditor019 (2023-06-02 14:43:00+00:00): I did not realise I did this. Is there any way of reverting it
rskedgell (2023-06-02 14:54:12+00:00): No problem. If you just reinstate the area=yes tag on way/534299476, it'll resolve it without losing any of the other highway/building intersections you've fixed (thanks for doing those, btw).

You may find that some QA tools will give a false positive where you have pedestrian or footway areas sharing nodes with buildings.
Khashayar Ebrahimpour (2023-06-02 14:12:21+00:00): تعمیرگاه خلیل زانتیا - تعمیرات انواع سیتروئن - زانتیا 2000 - زانتیا 1800 - زانتیا 3000 شش سیلندر
eggie (2023-06-02 14:40:27+00:00): Reverted due to vandalism

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=136870313

 

Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits.  
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen.  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-06-02 14:57:04+00:00): reverted by changeset #136871299
o_andras (2023-06-25 17:16:41+00:00): Olá, em que te baseaste para desenhar [este ribeiro](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178321071)? Olhando para as ortofotos de Portugal Continental de 2021 acho muito pouco provável haver qualquer corrente de água em muitos dos pontos por onde desenhaste. Alguns exemplos:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=41.1209018&mlon=-8.0121259#map=19/41.1209018/-8.0121259
https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=41.1199449&mlon=-8.0126116#map=19/41.1199449/-8.0126116
https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=41.1190302&mlon=-8.0128358#map=19/41.1190302/-8.0128358
https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=41.1184813&mlon=-8.0125556#map=19/41.1184813/-8.0125556
https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=41.1137387&mlon=-8.0077548#map=19/41.1137387/-8.0077548

O changeset tem como `imagery_used` o "CyclOSM", o que me parece desde já errado.

No futuro usa por favor as imagens mais actualizadas nas zonas em que editares (por exemplo as Ortofotos de Portugal Continental de 2021).
topolusitania (2023-06-26 10:10:56+00:00): Olá
 A camada CycloOSM não deve ser usada para o mapeamento de linhas de água, intermitentes ou não.
Razão:
Origem dos dados de altimetria:  SRTM que pela sua forma de obtenção não tem a precisão necessária para mapeamentos a este nível de detalhe. O máximo que consegues obter é uma "tendência" do declive, nunca onde a hipotética linha de água corre. 
Os dados SRTM funcionam quase como os dados Corine Land Cover para a ocupação  dos solos: Dão tendencias gerais, mas quando descemos à escala em que mapeamos, os erros são mais que muitos
Bom trabalho
TL
Maplander (2023-06-26 11:24:11+00:00): Agradeço os contactos e as sugestões.
Quando uso essa referência por regra procuro de seguida ajustar em função de bases de ortofotos mesmo reconhecendo que por vezes o ajustamento caba por ficar adiado.
Fiquem à vontade para eventuais ajustamentos e correcções pois o meu lema é de que quem corrige fá-lo sempre num pressuposto de melhorar. 
At.te
ML
o_andras (2023-07-01 22:20:32+00:00): Olá novamente!

Na minha opinião, o mapa deve ser mantido tão perto da realidade quanto nos for possível para que seja o mais útil possível. Achas que o riacho está perto da realidade o suficiente para alguém o encontrar sem muita dificuldade?

Baseado nas ortofotos, não vejo simplesmente por onde o riacho possa passar, por isso, e sem querer depreciar as tuas contribuições, se me coubesse a mim, limitava-me a apagá-lo.

Se conseguisses obter mais pontos de referência para melhorar óptimo! Senão, acho que o melhor é criar uma nota a pedir referências a alguém da zona. E se não houver ninguém que possa obter tais referências com alguma brevidade, proponho apagar (se ninguém se opuser) e deixar link para o way na nota (para se reverter a remoção e melhorar baseado em novas fontes).

Que vos parece, Maplander, topolusitania?
o_andras (2023-07-01 22:29:51+00:00): Esqueçam o meu comentário anterior :) Vi agora que o way foi redesenhado e está muito melhor. Obrigado pela contribuição Maplander!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137777940
eggie (2023-06-02 14:47:13+00:00): reverted by changeset #136871642
eggie (2023-06-02 14:46:20+00:00): reverted by changeset #136871583
eggie (2023-06-02 14:45:23+00:00): reverted by changeset #136871549
eggie (2023-06-02 14:52:42+00:00): https://www.wetrecht.nl/vernieling/

Kijk even wat de sanctie is op het wel of niet opzettelijk vernielen van een database.
MVG
eggie
george1201 (2023-06-04 20:55:33+00:00): Hi ratrun,
why did you delete way 1059978660? It is the way to a door (node 9738631561) in the noise_barrier wall. How can the door reached now without a way?
ratrun (2023-06-05 15:04:58+00:00): The way 1059978660 was not connected to the way 1178221564. I connect both ways via their shared node and merged them into a single way as the tags were identical. So no information was lost.
george1201 (2023-06-05 20:29:58+00:00): Oh sorry, I think that the previous CS 136850669 of W0lle is the reason for the loss of the connection. The way to the door was modified and the connection to the door was interrupted. See my comments to CS 136850669. Sorry for my false accusation.
rodolfovargas (2023-06-02 20:02:30+00:00): Hola.

Muy buenos aportes de farmacias en La Paz.
Quizá, para ayudar al usuario a identificar más rápido, se podría agregar en el nombre "Farmacia xxxxxxxx"
Le dejo como sugerencia. 

Saludos.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-06-25 19:21:53+00:00): I wonder if festival grounds actually need a separate landuse when it's located on landuse=village_green.
jemm (2023-08-14 11:11:30+00:00): One is amenity=festival_grounds and the other landuse=village_green - so this makes sense. And in cultural context its is also important to document both names.