piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
slice0 (2023-12-20 04:28:13+00:00): you dont unserstand, by upgrading it to secondary status you are saying that section is built to handle secondary traffic. it has a train track close to a intersection and it goes through a industrial area and it is single lane. it is not designed to handle secondary traffic. maybe territory status would be ok. i=but the intention is not to route secondary traffic through this tiny lane. it would be very dangerous for trucks and bus's , the eastern parade/expressway intersection is designed for heavier use..
fortera_au (2023-12-20 04:35:41+00:00): And like I said, you could make an argument that tertiary is valid, and I agree, so I've done that here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145315246.
swinetown (2023-12-20 03:54:50+00:00): Messed up changeset comment (autofill); this was mostly buildings, fences and some landuse.
nevw (2023-12-20 06:04:53+00:00): Hi, this looks like a service road to me and not an unclassified road
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
nevw (2023-12-20 06:07:41+00:00): Hi, Rondanella Drive appears to me to be a usual residential street with normal access to residential housing. Why is it tagged access=private? It is a gated community or similar?
nevw (2023-12-20 06:18:10+00:00): Upon further viewing area, it does seem likely to be a gated community segregated from other residential areas.
BCNorwich (2023-12-21 07:57:02+00:00): Hi, Please be aware that you've placed the cycleway Way: 1198475629 and Way: 1232576328 on top and very close to the existing track Way: 89739477. I wonder if the new cycleway is supposed to replace the existing track? If so then it's OSM practice to amend the existing highways to meet any new layout of highways. Also there's a gate near the roundabout, should that be removed?

Regards Bernard,
Zandu (2023-12-20 05:06:23+00:00): Converting ways to relations to reduce overlapping ways.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145314925
fititnt (2023-12-20 05:22:22+00:00): Olá @EvertonBortolini.

conforme discussão em https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141685445#map=16/-29.2396/-51.8744 (onde a prefeitura de Encantado ficou deletada por três meses) esse elemento foi re-criado sem manter histórico.

Se vocês mesmos vão tentar uma terceira segunda revisão, no mínimo tem que recuperar o o elemento deletado (conforme https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history)

E você também tem que fazer changesets com comentário descritivo (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments), ainda mais uma situação tão grave como o que aconteceu.
citrula (2023-12-20 16:17:50+00:00): You need to move the business to the proper location in addition to changing the address.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-03 11:38:32+00:00): Hello!

You used
cycleway:left=nonw
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460558919/history

Have you maybe meant
cycleway:left=no
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
joel56dt (2024-03-26 23:32:32+00:00): Thanks for catching that. I think I intended for "none" but have now revised it to "no".
julcnx (2023-12-21 07:02:38+00:00): Hi Risa_dinda, what sources did you use? The street match no available imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145315534
tyfi (2023-12-20 05:13:41+00:00): I also used GPS data on this one to verify the bridge since it was offset a bit.
tyfi (2023-12-20 05:14:09+00:00): Turns out GPS validated Bing imagery, and the bridges were actually just wrong.
IgorMagellan (2024-01-17 08:53:06+00:00): Вы чем руководствуетесь удаляя броды через реку, существующие проезды, которые со спутника не видны - т.к. там поверхность дорожки - трава.
Cпрямляя улицы и меняя их статусы? Просто удаляя куски дороги в середине way... В угоду какому валидатору? Правка reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2023-12-20 13:00:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 145330405, 145330404, 145330399, 145330407 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy building import
woodpeck_repair (2023-12-20 13:00:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 145330405, 145330404, 145330399, 145330407 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy building import
UndueMarmot (2023-12-20 23:34:47+00:00): Changeset 500! 🎉
IgorMagellan (2024-01-17 09:10:47+00:00): Почему удален кусок дороги Куса-д.Терехта проходящий по дну реки? тем самым нарушая связность НП. Да, там вполне себе ездит транспорт, кроме весны с половодьем. А прекрасная хоть и влажноватая дорога вдоль реки почему удалена? Правка полностью вандальная. Откат.
Vulcanodong (2023-12-24 15:14:07+00:00): 欢迎你, 你的贡献太酷啦.现在临沂这边缺少的就是细节上的内容. 再次欢迎你来到OSM社区
arjunaraoc (2023-12-21 04:15:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my updates https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145354532 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145354473
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145316911
arjunaraoc (2023-12-27 15:37:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). GPX track posted to osm is visible only two -three node lengths in the center. That is also some what noisy.  Hope you can upload the GPX full tracks when you are using them as source.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145318115
chris66 (2024-01-22 09:10:26+00:00): Hi,
I dont think that payment:sofort ist correct...
boxie24storage (2024-01-22 09:16:14+00:00): I typed and the website openstreetmap suggest and I selected from drop down menu.
TheBestIdea (2024-01-05 20:47:22+00:00): Hey Guillaume,

This block of McGuinness (Green to Freeman) is in fact now 2way for bikes. I've surveyed it. I'm going to revert this.

Brandon
Stereo (2024-01-05 21:04:57+00:00): Hi Brandon! Indeed, it is now. Thank you!
habi (2023-12-20 07:37:46+00:00): Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/842621467/ war's, der mich hier hin gebracht hat
user_12523467 (2023-12-26 04:58:01+00:00): why?
IjRiver (2023-12-28 01:16:49+00:00): Hi Lamassu, I have made the classification upgrade of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4407400 to maintain the classification hierarchy until the junction. Please let me know if you think otherwise.
user_12523467 (2023-12-28 02:18:08+00:00): Hi IjRiver, I thought you have changed this road classification:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4407402#map=18/33.26022/44.36476

my mistake, it is located in the truck waiting zone/yard,  the trucks wait here to enter the silo.
 thank you for the effort.
IjRiver (2024-01-03 05:38:48+00:00): Hello Lamassu, thank you for your correspondence. Based on the information that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4407402 is designated as a truck waiting zone, I will update the classification for both https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4407402 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4407400 to service as this would be a more appropriate designation. Thank you for your local knowledge. Happy Mapping!
user_12523467 (2024-01-03 05:42:11+00:00): Thanks, I've seen your update
vasony (2023-12-20 09:46:03+00:00): Szia!

Mi a házszám szerkesztéseidnek a forrása?

Tamás
Henry572 (2023-12-28 19:39:21+00:00): Hi patdel76,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your contribution! Your local knowledge in this area is very useful.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me or other mappers, there are many possible communication channels.
Just a small note regarding these changes: A building doesn't require the tag area=yes because that's the default for buildings. hsc666 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/hsc666) has already cleaned that up.

Hendrik
Айнур_tat (2023-12-22 10:28:45+00:00): Добрый день, а зачем удалили отсутствующий заезд на М-12 если ехать со стороны Казани который я добавлял?
Что с этой дорогой было не так?
Глеб (2023-12-23 16:14:20+00:00): Вы можете точнее указать координаты?
eggie (2023-12-20 13:05:12+00:00): Dag Marcel, Je vraagt feedback.. 
Het lijkt me helemaal kloppen nu. 
Zal ooit wel iets veranderd zijn hier.
MVG
eggie
Marcel van der Boom (2023-12-20 13:11:25+00:00): BAG en situatie ter plaatse zijn het eens over de nummering, BGT heeft nr 3 nog op die plek staan, wat foutief lijkt, dus wilde even extra check
mcliquid (2023-12-20 16:29:35+00:00): Hallo, ich bin kein großer Fan davon, überall das Wort "proposed" zu verwenden. Insbesondere wenn man bedenkt, dass bisher noch keine Variante beschlossen wurde und somit nicht einmal sichergestellt werden kann, wie und wann etwas gebaut wird.
Bisher gibt es auch keinen mir bekannten Renderer, der diese Daten darstellt. Welchen Mehrwert haben diese Daten dann hier?
arjunaraoc (2023-12-22 03:16:29+00:00): Hello, place tags need to have name.  a village can  be a node or a way. Since you decided to keep it as a node, you can delete the place tag from the way and keep it as residential area. As there are two residential areas separated by non residential area, you may like to add multiple residential land use areas. Also Thotamula residental area is overlapping with Gampalagudem area.  JSON is better for editing than iD as it gives additional warnings and has additional facilities for editing. As you seem to have lot of interest in Wikipedia and OSM, like me, you may like to start using JOSM at the earliest. Let me know if you have questions by commenting on this thread or sending me a private message. Best wishes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145320864
RWILDONLINE (2023-12-24 20:54:41+00:00): Hello Sir, thank you for your valuable feedback and guidance. It was truly an honor to come across your work on Wikipedia, and I appreciate the opportunity to learn from experienced contributors like yourself. I've installed JOSM as you suggested, and I'm planning to use it after watching some tutorial videos to familiarize myself with its features.

On another note, I encountered a slight hiccup recently. An administrator found my username, RevenueDPT, on Wikipedia to be promotional and subsequently blocked it three days ago. I promptly replied, requesting a username change to comply with the guidelines. If there's any way you could expedite this process, I would greatly appreciate it.

Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145320864
arjunaraoc (2023-12-25 01:20:06+00:00): Hello RWILDONLINE, Nice to see that your request for username change is completed. I appreciate your response. You can contact me or other members of India community on Telegram for any help. Happy mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145320864
bxl-forever (2023-12-20 09:22:46+00:00): Hello,

Pardon my curiosity but those are very strange tags.
"motor_vehicle=designated" on a path is understood as having a footpath which has been specifically built to accomodate all kinds motor vehicles (in particular cars), and where they are legally allowed to drive.

Here is a picture of the
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=512548510086792
It looks like a forest path, and it seems to be completely unsuitable for motor vehicles.

Could you please tell us what kind of "modification circulation" went on here exactly?

(Maybe you wanted to edit only one part of the road, as it seems that larger vehicles may reach the southern part near the houses, and not the entire path across the woods.)
Schum10 (2023-12-20 09:31:54+00:00): Hello,

Yes I have change because it was a stake on the map but de first part of the road can be taken for go to de house with number 11. I change that and you can say me if it's bether?
bxl-forever (2023-12-21 15:54:52+00:00): Don’t worry, we fixed it.
Making it an ordinary road is the most appropriate option here.
eggie (2023-12-20 09:32:16+00:00): Ho This is not addr:housenumber		8 in this building/
Please look again.
Please use the present addressnodes.
Greetz,
eggie
WoSoe (2023-12-20 10:32:40+00:00): Hinweis: Bei einer Relation type=boundary sind alle Daten des Schutzgebietes der Relation zugeordnet. Die einzelnen Ways (geschlossene wie offene) sollen, sofern sie keine Tags aus anderen Relationen besitzen, nur erläuternde note=* oder description=*-Tags erhalten.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:boundary=protected%20area?uselang=de#Relation_type=boundary
HAmap (2023-12-20 14:46:44+00:00): ah, danke für den Hinweis und den Link!
@milet hat mich in der community auch auf diesen Fehler hingewiesen.
Ich schau mir die Relation an (habe ich noch nicht ausreichend kapiert) und mache rückgängig was notwendig ist.
eggie (2023-12-20 09:36:41+00:00): Merged info with addressnode 18.
Please no space in a postcode.
Greetz,
eggie
mcliquid (2023-12-20 16:23:33+00:00): Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
alix_geovelo (2023-12-20 16:31:05+00:00): HI, 
Oups, i'm sorry for that rookie mistake. I work on contribution  and didn't see that I forget to send the previous one, because i was cut in my work by a meeting.
Thanks for you work doing quality on osm
jmarchon (2023-12-21 06:20:45+00:00): Nice work and welcome to OSM!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145322131
Langlaeufer (2023-12-20 11:38:32+00:00): Hallo kukuk, Da fehlt kein bicycle sondern access ist falsch. Fußgänger wären so übrigens auch ausgesperrt. hier gehört einfach nur motor_vehicle oder vehicle=agricultural daran, je nachdem wie es beschildert ist. Der Weg wäre dann wohl auch ein Feldweg (track) Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145322610
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-20 09:30:22+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106993171

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_1566574 (2024-01-14 17:28:02+00:00): I don't think https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/864941315 is residential ; is it?
nslxndr (2023-12-20 09:51:57+00:00): Szia! Milyen forrásból rögzíted ilyen mennyiségben országszerte szétszórva ezeket a házszámokat? Nehéz elképzelni, hogy felmérésből adódik 1-1 kistelepülésre 1-1 házszám. De a legfőbb problémám velük, hogy potenciálisan pontatlanok, adott esetben irreálisak.
porux (2023-12-20 09:55:45+00:00): Szia!
A forrást sajnos nem adhatom ki. Idegilenesen kellett egy feladathoz berögzítenem. Sajnos a hrsz-eket nem találja a rendszer így kénytelen voltam egy ideiglenes címet jelölni a térképre. Amint lehetséges a hrszek pontos helyének beazonosítása javítani fogom.
BáthoryPéter (2023-12-20 10:02:41+00:00): Az OSM szerkesztéséhez kizárólag olyan forrás használható, ami deklaráltan engedélyezi az OSM-ben való felhasználást, vagy eleve szabad licencű. „Titkos” forrásokból nem lehet dolgozni.
meskobalazs (2023-12-20 10:03:58+00:00): Szia! Ez így elég aggasztóan hangzik. És miért küldesz be minden módosítást külön módosításcsomagként?
vmiklos (2023-12-20 10:20:14+00:00): Kérlek azonnal hagyd abba a forrásod alapján való szerkesztést, házszámokat Magyarországon tipikusan csak saját felmérés alapján lehet felvinni, nem nagyon van más használható forrás. Ha ezt nem teszed, annak ban lesz a vége. :) Köszi!
porux (2023-12-20 10:22:26+00:00): Köszönöm a jelzéseket. Elnézést a kellemetlenségért. Törlöm az eddigi hibásan rögzített adatokat.
bkil (2023-12-20 10:59:00+00:00): Köszönjük
uᴉʍOꓨ (2023-12-21 03:36:05+00:00): There's a logic error in the access tags. The default is access=private, but the mode specific foot=yes, and motorcar=yes will over-ride the default. Has this been overlooked?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145323357
bxl-forever (2023-12-20 11:26:47+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for "better reflecting the reality".  Indeed, this area of the map seems to have changed in recent years and not many people were actively updating the map.

Here are two suggestions to improve your edits.

1) Try to make smaller/more specialised uploads.  For instance, work on a single road, or a couple of buildings, and then upload that.  And only then, start working on another part.  This will make it much easier for your fellow mappers when reviewing changes in an area, especially if you can provide clear descriptions of what/why you changed something.

2) I see you redrew some buildings, like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29418761
Maybe nobody told you but buildings are never traced on (distorted) aerial imagery… because those images are updated every year and if you compare images from different years, roads don’t move but taller structures such as buildings shift a bit, depending on the location of the plane when the picture was taken.
To solve this, we use numerical imagery, which works out of the box in most editors.
I see you are using the online editor, so it works like this: hit the Background button on the right and scroll down to "Digitaal Vlaanderen GRB", which has the proper outline of all buildings in the Flemish Region.  Trace buildings on top of this.

Happy mapping.
Dangiris (2023-12-20 11:36:52+00:00): Thanks for the tips, note taken!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-20 09:50:37+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9781408243
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9781408242
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9781408239
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9781408237
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9781408261
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9781408260
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10826410285
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4457293382
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9781408263
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9781408262
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232637959
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/916732462
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/916732464
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527604279
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066065271
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066065273
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395503525
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1183492038
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1183492043
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066065373

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Jose Luis Infante (2023-12-20 10:44:42+00:00): Hola,
ya era correcto como estaba anteriormente. Que sea una pista no significa que no se pueda circular a pie. Se debe dejar como pista y añadir que se puede circular a pie.
Un saludo!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145323506
Supaplex (2023-12-28 11:06:39+00:00): 安心堂中醫診所
MarcoR (2024-01-06 15:45:35+00:00): Questo changeset è stato annullato in quanto si tratta di un test come dichiarato dallo stesso utente nel commento al changeset 145325133

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145962009
arcanma (2023-12-21 11:27:33+00:00): Giulia, il nome Aa mi sembra un nome di fantasia, se non sai il nome del negozio, o non lo ha, non serve metterlo. Anche la posizione mi lascia qualche dubbio, il negozio è all'interno dell'università?
Giulia2112 (2023-12-21 12:41:29+00:00): Ciao, scusami stavo facendo delle prove per una ricerca universitaria e mi sono dimenticata di rimuoverle subito dopo
arcanma (2023-12-21 14:31:27+00:00): Nessun problema, grazie della risposta, appena puoi rimuovi gli inserimenti superflui, le informazioni utili invece sono sempre le benvenute in OSM!
kuhni74 (2024-12-30 11:52:47+00:00): wo genau soll der Seillift (Stricklift?) Harbachgraben sein - südlich oder nördlich der Forststraße? das Gebäude wäre derzeit südlich, der Lift selbst nördlich eingezeichnet.
StVeit_Maps (2025-02-21 09:44:09+00:00): Soweit ich das beurteilen kann ist der Lift auf der Forststraße das Lifthäuschen steht aber südlich der Straße am Waldrand (Forststraße ist im Winter eine Piste da es hier realtiv Flach ist/leicht bergauf geht wird der Stricklift benötigt)
kuhni74 (2025-02-21 10:31:43+00:00): Vielen Dank! Aber verläuft der Lift dann in der Mitte der Straße? Fährt irgendwo ein Pistengerät / Traktor / etc., oder ist die ganze Forststraße Lifttrasse? Wird der Lift im Frühling abgebaut und im Herbst wieder aufgebaut?
StVeit_Maps (2025-02-21 12:15:41+00:00): Der Lift verläuft auf der nördlichen Seite der Straße. Die ist an der Stelle ja recht breit. Der Lift wird im Frühjahr abgebaut und im Herbst wieder aufgebaut. (ist ja eigentlich nur ein Motor der einen Strick zieht.) Die Straße ist breit genug, dass eine Pistenraupe einmal die Straße runterfahren kann und so eine kleine Piste zieht.
GroßarlFuchs3847 (2025-02-21 12:52:41+00:00): Dies stimmt so nicht ganz, die Antrieb - und Umlenkstation bleiben im Sommer stehen, ebenso die Stationshütte, lediglich das Seil / der Strick wird im Sommer entfernt. Im Winter wird das Seil mittels einer Hubeinrichtung um ca. 3-4 m angehoben, sodass die Pistenraupe durchfahren kann.
kuhni74 (2025-02-21 13:22:32+00:00): Vielen Dank für die fundierte Ortskenntnis, d.h. eigentlich stimmt durchaus alles so wie derzeit gemappt?
GroßarlFuchs3847 (2025-02-22 11:21:18+00:00): Genau👍, hab ja auch ich gemappt😜
kuhni74 (2025-02-22 12:28:58+00:00): Passt. Es hat mich nur gewundert, dass das Häuschen gegenüber des Lifts ist. Mit einer temporären Umlenkeinrichtung hab ich zunächst nicht gerechnet.
benoitdd (2023-12-20 17:12:53+00:00): salut OpenStreetRider

quelle est ta source pour la couleur que tu as donné (#f59bbb) à la ligne 7? Ce n'est pas la même que dans wikidata (FA9ABA), qui est elle-même différente de cette source RVB255-130-180 soit #FF82B4 (à la page 29): https://eu.ftp.opendatasoft.com/stif/PrescriptionsSignaletiques/IDFM_Prescriptions%20signaletiques_V3.0.pdf?ref=ile-de-france-mobilites

trouvée ici:
https://prim.iledefrance-mobilites.fr/fr/chartes-et-prescriptions
benoitdd (2023-12-20 17:22:43+00:00): autre source plus ordonnée: https://prim.iledefrance-mobilites.fr/fr/jeux-de-donnees/referentiel-des-lignes
OpenStreetBuilder (2023-12-20 19:26:50+00:00): Hello, je me suis basé sur une source donnée par Organic Maps, à savoir Route "#fa9aba" has different colour from master "#f59bbb" (relation 123652, "Métro 7: La Courneuve - 8 mai 1945 → Mairie d'Ivry")

Effectivement tu as raison, j'ai trouvé les couleurs dans le référentiel suivant : https://eu.ftp.opendatasoft.com/stif/PrescriptionsSignaletiques/IDFM_Prescriptions%20signaletiques_V3.0.pdf?ref=ile-de-france-mobilites

Je vais corriger mes modifications. 

Merci pour le retour