piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pitfire (2023-01-21 06:19:06+00:00): Hi rempshaener,
ich kann leider nur die Luftbilder interpretieren. 
Straßen, die Gebäude kreuzen, sollten Brücken, Tunnel oder verschiedene Ebenen benutzen.
z.B. von Süden kommend gehört der weg unter die Glasdachpassage. Im Norden beim verlassen des Gebäudes muss man vom Dach springen. Die Treppe im Westen führt aufs Dach und hat damit eine andere Ebene.
Wenn Wege über ein Gebäudedach führen und das Gebäude auf Ebene 0 steht, ist der Weg mindestens "layer 1"
Mit dem Schlüssel layer=* kann die Überlagerung von Elementen (Wegen, Knoten oder Flächen) angegeben werden.
Bitte überprüfe das nochmal
Gruß
rempshaener (2023-01-21 07:15:59+00:00): Hallo,
unter dem Glasdach ist der Weg, er ist mit covered=yes erfasst.
Ich habe jetzt auch layer=1 teilweise ergänzt. Das trifft es aber bei diesem Fall nicht wirklich, jetzt fällt man datentechnisch erst recht „vom Dach“: von layer 1 auf 0. Das Gebäude ist in das Geländeprofil modelliert. Im Süden geht es ebenerdig rein, im Norden ebenerdig wieder raus. Im Osten ist es ein- bzw. zweigeschossig. Die Rampen und Treppen beginnen bei layer 0, enden aber auf layer 1. Damit sind sie selbst weder 1, noch 0. Das ist m.E. kaum darzustellen.
Viele Grüße
pitfire (2023-01-21 10:50:50+00:00): Danke für dein Arrangement, :-)
kannst ja nochmals über den gesamten Golfplatz streifen und die veschobenen bzw. felenden Wasserquerungen bereinigen.
(bridge=Weg: 185265551) ist laut Luftbild etwas weit im Osten.
(Wassergraben #185513775) fehlt "highway=bridge" auf Weg: 124974069.
Die nördliche Wasserverbindung (Weg: 87562016 & Weg: 87562016) mit Brücke fehlt.
Alles nicht deine Schuld, aber den letzten beissen die Hunde.
Schönes Wochenende und Gruß
pitfire
rempshaener (2023-01-21 21:00:23+00:00): Hallo,
ich weiß ich weiß, macht aber nichts :-)
Gefühlt habe ich jetzt den halben Platz umgebaut, sehe aber noch ziemlich viele offene Baustellen - dafür kenne ich mich aber golferisch nicht gut genug aus.
Viele Grüße
PT-53 (2023-01-21 11:49:55+00:00): Hallo Harald,
wie mir gerade auf Rückfrage von Mapper seichter bestätigt wurde, ist die Datenübernahme aus dem Geoportal-BW - derzeit - nicht zulässig da  nicht lizenzkompatibel.

Mapper DD1GJ - unser Ansprechpartner für Behörden - ist derzeit dabei abzuklären, welche Daten aus dem Geoportal-BW wir künftig nutzen dürfen. 
Bitte verzichte bis dahin auf weitere Datenübernahmen aus dem Geoportal-BW. Unter Umständen müssen Deine Datenübernahmen revertiert werden.

Siehe hierzu auch den folgenden Beitrag im OSM-Forum:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/maps4bw-und-basemap-de/6762

Grüße
Harald Hetzner (2023-01-22 09:20:22+00:00): Hallo PT-53,

es gelten die gleichen Nutzungsbedingungen des Landes Baden-Württemberg wie für Maps4BW. Die Daten dürfen unter "der Lizenz „Datenlizenz Deutschland - Namensnennung - Version 2.0“ (www.govdata.de/dl-de/by-2-0) kostenfrei genutzt werden".

Es ist daher nicht erforderlich die entsprechenden Datenübernahmen zu revidieren.

Grüße Harald
Harald Hetzner (2023-01-22 16:45:34+00:00): Die Vektorlinien sind jetzt zusätzlich mit source="Datengrundlage: LGL, www.lgl-bw.de" getaggt. Somit ist die geforderte Quellenangabe nun definitiv an gut sichtbarer Stelle eingebunden.
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-21 09:10:07+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 131503279, 131503291, 131503300, 131503308, 131503314, 131503329.
pantufla (2023-01-31 21:51:59+00:00): Hola, creo que generaste duplicados. Voy a borrar.
gscholz (2023-05-18 08:09:02+00:00): Hi Gauchodelsur,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of "Thorne":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-67.70494&lat=-53.77850&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131522528

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
zstadler (2023-08-13 14:27:17+00:00): שלום ירון,

תודה על מיפוי השביל הכחול.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133912665

 אתה זוכר אם בקצה המזרחי שלו השביל מסתיים בדרך העפר או ממשיך על דרך העפר עד לכביש הסמוך?

תודה,
זאב
YaronAG (2023-08-21 17:15:15+00:00): אהלן זאב,
עבר זמן מאז הסימון הזה... אבל המסלול זכור לי בין השאר כיוון שהיה כה מוצלח, ואם אני זוכר נכונה- הסימון אכן מסתיים כך, וההשלמה על דרך העפר עד לכביש היא ללא סימון צבע.
וטוב שהחזרת אותי לכאן, כי שכחתי לעדכן את הזיהוי של השיח שם... כעת יבוצע!
Graptemys (2023-01-20 21:07:58+00:00): Caused by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131520276
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-01-21 11:17:05+00:00): Her kunne du bare have sat natural=scrub på https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149240385

Så der ikke er to veje lige oven i hinanden.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-09 09:59:10+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10571473090/history has flag:type = commercial that was added in this edit
what was meant by flag:type=commercial ? How it differs from flag:type=advertising ?
Sylv3st3r (2024-05-24 14:00:08+00:00): Hi,
I think there needs to be addr:housenumber tag, instead of addr:housename.

Can you fix it for all ?

Thank you!
frosm (2025-11-23 06:47:02+00:00): Bonjour,
as-tu vu la station à cet endroit ?
car je pense qu'elle se trouve de l'autre côté du bâtiment
David_RF (2025-11-24 09:37:37+00:00): https://www.google.com/maps/place/Borne+de+recharge+Fastned/@49.072342,4.78871,3a,77.5y,90t/data=!3m8!1e2!3m6!1sAF1QipNhgRBPYtvX7PRwfcn6ohjvd9HorbnmClE6Q9W3!2e10!3e12!6shttps:%2F%2Flh3.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipNhgRBPYtvX7PRwfcn6ohjvd9HorbnmClE6Q9W3%3Dw152-h86-k-no!7i1595!8i899!4m11!1m2!2m1!1s+Fastned+Aire+de+Valmy+Oberval!3m7!1s0x47ebb99ab8833ff9:0xf68e1768df50f1fc!8m2!3d49.0722917!4d4.7888057!10e5!15sCh1GYXN0bmVkIEFpcmUgZGUgVmFsbXkgT3JiZXZhbCIDiAEBkgEhZWxlY3RyaWNfdmVoaWNsZV9jaGFyZ2luZ19zdGF0aW9u4AEA!16s%2Fg%2F11tn9r505f?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MTEyMC4xIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
kartler175 (2023-01-21 10:36:47+00:00): Was soll das werden?
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=11.61157&lat=52.12502&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Robert46798 (2023-01-21 12:08:26+00:00): Moin,
steht doch im Änderunsgsatzkommentar. Ich bin nur nicht so schnell in der Bearbeitung. Demnächst sollte es behoben sein.
Viele Grüße,
Robert
paganella31 (2023-01-21 09:01:52+00:00): Ciao.
Mi pare di vedere che in questo ed altri changeset hai modificato le fermate, cambiando il nome o togliendo le virgolette.
Hai una fonte, oppure hai ritenuto che i nomi fossero sbagliati? Sono abbastanza sicuro che quelli già inseriti fossero giusti, e non sono a conoscenza di modifiche in tal senso da parte di Trentino Trasporti. 

Forse e l'utilizzo di barre e virgolette ti è sembrato inappropriato. In realtà questi sono i nomi che compaiono nei quadri orario e sulle pensiline, vedi per esempio https://www.trentinotrasporti.it/pdforari/urbani/fermate/OrariDiFermataConPercorso-T22I-24610x-T-09_R.PDF. Chi a suo tempo ha inserito le fermate su OSM ha seguito questa convenzione, che prevede tre modelli: Paese/Nome Via, Paese/"Nome Luogo" o "Nome Luogo". Ad esempio "San Donà" è la fermata di riferimento per il quartiere omonimo, o Piazza Dante / "Palazzo PAT" è la fermata della piazza di fronte al Palazzo della Provincia.

Spero che adesso la questione risulti più chiara. Se hai dubbi sono pronto a risponderti, altrimenti credo sarebbe il caso di ripristinare lo stato precedente alle modifiche.
alessandrocarmeli (2023-01-21 11:07:31+00:00): Ho fatto un kavoro di pairing, che consiste nel nominare le due fermate l'una fronte l'altra nello stesso nome per non creare bug nel PTLD (vedi ad esempio la 10: https://www.overpass-api.de/api/sketch-line?network=Servizio+Urbano+Trento&ref=10&operator=&correspondences=&width=1600&height=495&font-size=&force-rows=1&max-cors-per-line=&max-cors-below=&style=)
paganella31 (2023-01-22 15:36:24+00:00): Questo aspetto è sicuramente interessante, avendo lavorato sulla mappatura delle linee avevo visto pure io che le visualizzazioni di Overpass sono talvolta poco chiare. Però resta il fatto che nella realtà i nomi giusti sono quelli vecchi.

Dunque se da una parte hai sistemato la visualizzazione di Overpass, dall'altro lato ora la mappa fornisce informazioni sbagliate a chi la utilizza.

In definitiva credo che ciò che dovrebbe cambiare sia l'algoritmo di rendering delle linee, non la mappa. E ritengo ancora sia opportuno ripristinare lo stato precedente.

Rimango a disposizione, ciao.
lucadelu (2023-01-23 10:58:32+00:00): concordo anch'io che queste modifiche non andrebbero fatte, i nomi sono quelli che erano presenti precedentemente che vanno ripristinati
paganella31 (2023-02-06 18:00:14+00:00): Passate due settimane senza ulteriori risposte, e avendo informato la lista nazionale a riguardo, ho eseguito il revert delle modifiche in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132168721. Se avessi dubbi o altro possiamo continuare la discussione qui o in lista. Ciao
CurlingMan13 (2023-01-20 22:42:45+00:00): Why did you delete the trails?
flyingember (2023-01-20 22:57:18+00:00): I referred to the Bartle camp trails map and removed all trails not on i nor not close to.  I'm going to add everything from the official map, very few of which are on the map.
one_half_3544 (2023-06-15 08:45:28+00:00): Давайте не будем тащить свои треки в базу, ок? "Направление" можно себе локально в навигатор загрузить
Местный 2 (2023-06-19 03:33:10+00:00): Ok
mueschel (2023-01-23 11:05:58+00:00): Please check this area, it doesn't have any valid tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133922351

Here the geometry looks really weird:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15343111
Glassman (2023-01-24 21:31:25+00:00): Thanks for catching the missing tags which is now corrected. The weird geometry is what the state has. I agree that it looks like a mistake but it is exactly what the state shows.
Glassman (2023-01-24 21:33:41+00:00): I added the off trust lands because of the residential lands off of Rutsatz Road. There was no Whatcom county records of what it was nor did Bing Street Side show any signs. When I looked at the off trust lands that's where I discovered it was part of the Nooksack reservation
NorthCrab (2023-01-22 09:46:12+00:00): Dodałem landuse=retail do zaznaczonego przez ciebie obszaru. Jeśli rysujesz cały obszar stacji benzynowej to warto go używać.
Dokumentacja tego tagu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dretail
bxl-forever (2023-01-21 01:06:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10571511369 is an invalid object.

Just like every object in OSM, a vending machine must have a primary tag defining what it is (a shop, a house, an amenity…) → this is "amenity=vending_machine", and then you can add the "vending=parking_ticket" tag, describing in more details what it delivers.

Using the secondary tag without the primary tag is incoherent.  It just makes the node useless because it will not be rendered (i.e. shown) on any map, and no app will ever find it.

Again, no source tag on individual objects, please, it just clutters the database for nothing.  I see you started adding the source tag to your changesets now, this is fine, but please do NOT add a source tag to every object you create.
bxl-forever (2023-01-21 01:13:32+00:00): Hello Telekijker:

Please read the comments I—or other mappers—have been leaving on your previous changesets.

I am sure you are acting in good faith and want to be helpful but all your recent changesets have required some clean-up by me or other mappers.

Again, please do not add source tag on buildings: buildings contain several information (their shape, their address, sometimes the name of a firm, and some physical characteristics of the buiding such as the roof shape or colour) → a single "source" tag will never be able to justify everything, that is why current practice is to source changesets, not objects individually.

For the record, there are some problems with the naming of your tags.  I wish you could read this carefully to avoid doing the same mistake several times a week.

building:colour is okay but sometimes you type building:color (US spelling) or building;colour (semicolon separator), which are both invalid keys.
Sometimes, you want to type source and the autocorrect function writes surface (see version #2 of this object as an example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261191681/history)
map per (2023-01-22 19:06:03+00:00): Hello FB100,

I reviewed this changeset and most of it looks good.
The libary you added (1) however had already been mapped (2). So please change (1) back to an ordernary Building.

Thanks and best regards
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/699403820
(2) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6567748997
map per (2023-01-22 20:00:31+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur in Änderungssatz 131578298!
map per (2023-01-22 20:01:14+00:00): English: Thanks for the correction in changeset 131578298!
LateNightTone (2023-01-24 11:42:47+00:00): Hi, there seem to be some issues with the footpath you've added beside the Open University campus: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133926856
It crosses a road and a set of steps (without making clear whether they connect or go over/under each other), and it's also attached to the bridge area of the road, possibly inadvertently.

I can't see the route on aerial imagery, so can't make the adjustments myself; perhaps you can update the route with some local knowledge?
ianc (2023-01-24 12:47:37+00:00): It is the right of way as per the MKCC GIS system (and OS). From the aerial it looks like there *might* be an underpass there (the way OS is drawn seems to imply it), which seems to be the case with the nearby bridleway. Since I won't get down there for ages, fell free to add a "needs survey" fixme, but the line of the route is correct. There are a fair few eccentric ones!
ianc (2023-01-24 13:18:45+00:00): Actually, looking at this more closely I am going to revise the line a bit. I don't think the MK system has got this one right.
LateNightTone (2023-01-24 15:10:23+00:00): Spot on, thanks for amending :-)
somix (2023-01-21 09:31:44+00:00): Hi, why did you change "name" to "loc_name" here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152163769?
Tramparam Parampampam (2023-01-21 11:27:29+00:00): mate, stop breaking "Zalves militārais poligons", you are doing this second time. poligon should be vissible, your edits hiding it.
Colbertson (2023-01-21 11:31:20+00:00): Also smaller changesets with useful titles pls
arcth (2023-01-21 19:22:04+00:00): Hi somix,

These names seem to have quite limited use mostly by real estate agents and are not widely known, so should go into either alt_name or loc_name.
arcth (2023-01-21 19:24:12+00:00): Hi Tramparam Parampampam,

there is no military landuse yet, it is subject to further approval by parliament, hence the proposed:landuse tag. Also, data should not be adjusted to make things 'visible'.
Tramparam Parampampam (2023-01-22 08:55:32+00:00): i gave source in the object tag: https://www.mod.gov.lv/lv/selijas-militarais-poligons
it is not subject to aproval, it is already aproved by MO. and yes, data should be visible by map renderer. map renderer know nothing about "proposed:landuse" tag. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dmilitary
arcth (2023-01-23 23:39:54+00:00): The article you linked clearly says that MoD has prepared a draft law on this military range, it is not effective yet.

There is a wiki page on lifecycle prefixes [1] that includes 'proposed:'.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Trevor_1 (2023-02-04 17:49:46+00:00): Hello. I believe these sections are too short to be motorway islands. Usually, motorway islands should have 4 or more consecutive grade separated interchanges
Rainero (2023-01-21 12:24:12+00:00): hello FB100,  
welcome to OSM!  
I had a look at your change set, but unfortunately a lot of things don't look so good. The police station in Neufahrn was already mapped, you doubled it. You have made the parking spaces at the Carpark in the Eching commercial area into charging stations, but the charging station already exists. In addition, OSM only uses name for proper names. For the charging stations, Tesla is okay for brand and operator, but not for name. The "Bauhof der Gemeinde Eching" is not amenity=recycling; the recycling centre is right next to it and already mapped.
So I will revert your changes, but try to keep things which look good.  
If you are unsure how objects are mapped in OSM, you can check the wiki, e.g. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=charging_station . In the iD editor (in the browser) you may click on "i" at the bottom left of the properties and then on "see documentation" and you will be forwarded to the relevant wiki page.

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

Best regards,
Rainer
FB100 (2023-01-21 15:05:46+00:00): hello Rainer,
as you noted I'm new to OSM. I tried to make things more acurate buy changing things to a more detailed version (Tesla superchargers). It's ok if you don't want that, but I want to ask, why more detailed options even exist / get recommended, if you are not supposed to use them. Is there somewhere, where you can look up all the Types (I don't know what they are called) you are not allowed to use. Because I just tiped in the Type searchbar, the most detailed thing I'm thinking off.
Best Regards,
FB
Rainero (2023-01-21 22:22:22+00:00): Hello FB,  
yes, the intention to make the geo data more accurate is very good. My comment was not so much about the if as the how.  
Now I have reverted the "Bauhof", the police station and the charging station, but kept all the other stuff.  
Regarding the charging stations: I suppose you wanted to map the individual charging posts instead of the existing one with capacity=12? However what you did is exchange the amenity=parking_space with amenity=charging_station. So the information parking_space got lost.  
Maybe you want to give it another try? Take the existing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9572350807 , change the tag capacity to that of the individual charging post (1 or 2 or 3, I don't know the Tesla posts), shift it to the position of one of the posts, copy and paste it and shift them to the positions of the other posts.

Best regards,  
Rainer
abakus_uploader (2023-01-21 23:33:08+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
cas39 (2024-04-03 08:47:55+00:00): Macht das Tagen von Photovoltaik-Dächern Sinn, wenn das Gebäude an sich nicht gar nicht erfasst ist? 
Beispiel: Knoten 10571686326  / Stöckermattweg / Aeschi SO
VLD166 (2023-01-20 23:15:50+00:00): *Edits made @ 27.66776, 85.44508
NorthCrab (2023-01-22 09:42:18+00:00): Dzięki za poprawę. Zgadza się!
legofahrrad (2023-01-21 12:26:14+00:00): Hallo lberges,
wie kommt es, dass du den Namen des Spielplatzes https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146862683 von "Helgolander Straße" zu "Helgoländer Straße" geändert hast?
Der Name mit "a" ist schon richtig.
Viele Grüße
lberges (2023-01-21 17:11:46+00:00): Dachte erst, es sei ein Tippfehler. Verweise auf dei Senatspressestelle: https://www.senatspressestelle.bremen.de/pressemitteilungen/spielplatz-helgolaender-strasse-wird-eroeffnet-12198
legofahrrad (2023-01-21 17:56:10+00:00): In dem Artikel sind noch weitere Fehler, aber zusätzlich steht dort auch einmal "Helgolander Straße" richtig drin. 😉
Wie auch immer, ich habe den Spielplatz wieder umbenannt.
lberges (2023-01-21 19:14:40+00:00): Vermutlich ist in Walle gar kein Bezug zur dieser Insel vorhanden. Die Insulaner sagen nämlich auch: 
https://www.der-helgoländer.de/
hukran (2023-01-20 23:30:32+00:00): *Adding new places and some minor edits
Dawid2849 (2023-01-21 20:48:02+00:00): Coś poszło nie tak przy tej edycji, to nie jest budynek.
Mrksmlk (2023-01-21 23:55:57+00:00): Nie bardzo wiem, o którym budynku mówisz?
Mrksmlk (2023-01-22 00:09:02+00:00): Zmiana obiektu z parku rozrywki na muzeum o typie open_air (czyli muzeum na wolnym powietrzu- inaczej skansen) jest jak najbardziej dopuszczalna i celowa. Odnosi się do obszaru, na którym zgromadzone są liczne obiekty muzealne w tym budynki.
NorthCrab (2023-01-22 07:29:06+00:00): https://i.imgur.com/GqMI6YK.png
Ale oznaczenie całego obszaru jako jeden wielki budynek już nie, to o to tu chodzi. Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab (2023-01-22 07:29:29+00:00): Edytor zgłosił Ci że coś jest nie tak ;P
https://i.imgur.com/93Iplf7.png
Mrksmlk (2023-01-22 09:29:41+00:00): Ok, będę uważał.
woodpeck (2023-01-30 09:30:34+00:00): Danke - das Bezirksamt hat heute an den FOSSGIS geschrieben wegen dieser Umbenennung, aber natürlich war OSM schneller ;) der Vollständigkeit halber:

"Mit Beschluss des Bezirksamtes vom 18.10.2022 (zur Drucksache Nr. 0154/XXI der Bezirksverordnetenversammlung Tempelhof-Schöneberg) und Beschluss der Bezirksverordnetenversammlung Tempelhof-Schöneberg vom 16.11.2022 zur Drucksache Nr. 0377/XXI wird die Grün- und Erholungsanlage an der Gleditschstraße 3-23 in 10781 Berlin-Schöneberg zum 01.02.2023 benannt in "Ursula-Mamlok-Park".

Der gewählte Name nimmt Bezug auf Ursula Mamlok (geb. 01.02.1923 in Berlin, gest. 04.05.2016 ebenda). Sie war eine jüdische Komponistin und Dozentin.

Vom Amt für Statistik Berlin-Brandenburg wurde für den neuen Grünanlagennamen die statistische Schlüsselnummer 11349 vergeben.

Die Bekanntmachung erfolgte im Amtsblatt für Berlin Nr. 3 vom 20.01.2023."
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-20 09:23:41+00:00): lanes:forward and lanes:backward is useless with 2 lanes. oneway=no is useless unless its implied. This changeset added oneway=no to a roundabout
Glassman (2023-01-22 20:49:11+00:00): #TIP: access private isn't used unless the sidewalk is marked as private - no trespassing, or has a gate.

Also because OSM was founded in England, we use British English and their terms on tags. footway=sidewalk is only used when the footway is alongside of a street. Basically what we call a sidewalk is just a footway in England unless it's next to a road.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131526827
NorthCrab (2023-01-28 04:04:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10571686962/

Ze zdjęć lotniczych nie wygląda aby znajdował się tutaj turning circle tylko zwykłe zakończenie drogi. To że gdzieś można zawrócić nie oznacza że znajduje się tam turning circle.

Dokumentacja: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_circle

Pozdrawiam!
MxxCon (2023-01-21 07:35:49+00:00): It seems like when you converted playground into flagpole you still left gnis and wikidata tags of the playground on the new flagpole..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131527615
MxxCon (2023-01-21 07:37:38+00:00): I see you cleaned it up in the following edits.👍🙂
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131527615