piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Carto'Cité (2023-09-20 14:45:10+00:00): Bonjour Dazeilad,
Merci pour tes contributions sur les aménagements cyclables. Je me permets une correction sur cet aménagement :https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1160575847
Il s'agit en fait d'une Voie Verte ; je modifie les tags dans ce sens.
N’hésite pas à me contacter si tu as la moindre question.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-11 23:15:55+00:00): Is there a reason you don't connect the cartpaths over the waterways with a bridge?  Would add a lot more details to the map.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-04-08 13:32:44+00:00): Please be careful, you seem to have added some non existing traffic lights (example at the intersection of Avenue Grey and de Maisonneuve), at least there was none in late 2022. Also, please check how to map precise traffic lights with directions when sidewalks are present (place the traffic light at stopping line).
Strubbl (2023-04-11 21:31:55+00:00): Hi VSRA, in dem du den building-Tag von den Objekten entfernt hast, hast du die Gebäude gelöscht. Wenn dort ein Gebäude ist, muss da mindestens ein building=yes ran. Statt dem yes kann man auch noch spezifischere Werte hinzufügen, siehe die Liste im Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building?uselang=de

Würdest du bitte den building-Tag erneut hinzufügen, sodass die Gebäude wieder auf der Karte erscheinen?
emersonveenstra (2023-04-09 10:54:46+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15695169 is an invalid relation, a multipolygon cannot have relations as members. Please either fix or remove this relation, thanks!
Carto'Cité (2023-08-31 14:12:56+00:00): Salut José,
Alors comme ça tu contribues en Normandie ? 😀
Je vois passer tes contributions pendant mon travail de modération. Super ces ajouts de pistes !
À bientôt
Charles
Trevor_1 (2023-04-08 17:12:01+00:00): I didn't mean to make the changeset this big. The box that said "close changeset after upload" was accidentally left unchecked
user_12500175 (2024-05-19 08:54:37+00:00): Hallo,
von der Linie/Gleise ist zumindest Bahnhof-Kö mehr zu sehen, ich würde den Abschnitt entfernen.!?
ALu68 (2024-05-19 14:27:43+00:00): Du siehst ja an dem key "source": es werden hier Objekte eingetragen, die vor dem Strart von OSM schon weg waren - es sind hier einige Archäologen unterwegs.
user_5359 (2023-04-10 18:05:05+00:00): Hello (again)! Please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1tze. I assume you mean species instead of spieces?
adrianojbr (2023-04-12 13:00:45+00:00): Olá, Victor!

O Elevado da Seta fica nesse outro local: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/914557942#map=18/-27.64702/-48.52222

O Trevo da Seta em si não existe mais depois da construção do elevado: https://ndmais.com.br/transito/abertura-do-elevado-do-trevo-da-seta-em-florianopolis-muda-o-transito/.

Abraço!
OddlyAngled (2023-04-08 15:11:33+00:00): when a creek runs under a road add a culvert to the creek instead of creating a bridge on the road. unless there really is a bridge.

there is no need to add the number of lanes to the road name. the lanes=4 tag already covers this. thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134635084
Fresno map (2023-04-10 00:53:08+00:00): This section of CA 168 is known locally as "The Four Lane" and has been called that by the county sheriffs department, how would I edit the name to reflect this fact? Could quotation marks be included?

Thank you for fixing my faulty edit regarding the culverts! There are many bridges over year-round creeks but the vast majority of these are indeed culverts.
OddlyAngled (2023-04-10 14:56:47+00:00): if it's a name that would be used on an mailing address then `name` is fine... otherwise I'd use `loc_name` or maybe `alt_name` depending on how common it is. just something like `loc_name=The Four Lane` without quotes should be good. the road number is pulled from the `ref` tag so you don't need to add it again
SekeRob (2023-04-08 07:51:40+00:00): Hi,

Your monster forest (2387 members) disappeared from view. I see you closed the gap late last night which is good, the question though being: You've been working on this since 2015 at least. Why not split this relation in manageable and maintainable parcel? Just getting this to download and render and validate takes ages! I just tried is JOSM, 5 minutes and 63 members less near Terlago, the split somewhat down where not yet mapped cutlines are (function?) . Did not upload, just saved it as a local session, ready to go, if you're OK with that.

cheers
pikappa79 (2023-04-08 09:39:08+00:00): You are right! Over the years I've done nothing but add details without trying to divide the whole realtion into smaller areas (inheriting what was already there). In Trentino there are other macro landuses that should be divided in order to be maintainable. If you want, go ahead.

Bye!
SekeRob (2023-04-08 10:05:00+00:00): OK, first section done, added half dozen cutlines where powerlines run.

ciao
MxxCon (2023-04-08 00:55:11+00:00): Hello.
Why did you change this bicycle route to road type?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dbicycle
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134635984
MxxCon (2023-04-08 00:57:49+00:00): You also linked website tag to a pdf document. That doesn't seem correct.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134635984
Trevor_1 (2023-04-08 17:11:49+00:00): I didn't mean to make the changeset this big. The box that said "close changeset after upload" was accidentally left unchecked
user_5359 (2023-04-09 16:29:32+00:00): Hello! Short question the way https://www.osm.org/way/543318446 with the tag noname=yes is the only (street) member of a associatedStreet relation with the name "Rue des Mortières"? That does not make much sense!
Frans S (2023-04-08 07:47:48+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
About the traces you tagged as track.
Please take into consideration that a trace through a rural area connects also other highways  (over longer distances, even on adjacent task ) can be tagged as unclassified, 
A track is to be used only for access to farmland, water, woodlands
Best regards

See this wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Roads
BRPS (2023-04-10 14:56:27+00:00): Hello Frans, Thank you so much for clarification. Are we allowed to change the classification of roads in an adjacent task if this is deemed to be the best designation? I was also wondering if it is ok to change designation from  residential to an 
 unclassified road once housing along it diminishes in volume. I did so a couple of times and would like to know if this is an acceptable practice. I hope this is the right place to comment. Thank you, Barbara
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134636644
Frans S (2023-04-11 14:21:03+00:00): Hello Barbara.
My message is too long.
I wrote a direct message to you
best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134636644
julcnx (2023-04-08 07:33:49+00:00): Hey gaberdo84, welcome to OpenStreetMap! I noticed that you made edits in 5 different countries, which is quite impressive for a new mapper. Just a friendly tip for next time, it's best to start mapping in your local area based on your personal experiences, and take it slow as you learn more about the mapping process. Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134636991
Toniwillswhite1 (2024-10-02 23:06:49+00:00): My location for now
AgusQui (2023-04-12 13:49:49+00:00): Hola Mirko, estás haciendo un mal uso del tag branch, por favor leé la wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:usage%3Dbranch, se debe usar en tramos de poca importancia respecto a las líneas principales, claramente el ramal a Tigre no corresponde. Por favor si tenés dudas te invito al Telegram de la comunidad para discutirlo entre todos: https://t.me/osm_ar
gscholz (2023-04-17 06:08:32+00:00): Hi Fidelis Assis,
your recent activities have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-41.66371&lat=-14.27553&zoom=7&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Especially rivers have been affected.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Fidelis Assis (2023-04-17 13:03:36+00:00): Hello Guido.

Thank you for the warning. Fixed some intersections I caused when fixing/updating hundreds of county boundaries (unfortunately, waterways shared with boundary lines are not a good practice, IMHO). But most of the problems pointed out on that page are of another nature, like roads x river crossings, rivers x dams, etc, which I didn't touch while fixing the borders.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-08 03:20:13+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1160603866

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
zyphlar (2023-04-08 06:04:46+00:00): Hi there, thanks for being such a great OSM contributor! Remember, if a footway is parallel with and next to a street, it's probably a sidewalk and the road should be tagged with sidewalk=separate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134637833
LeTopographeFou (2025-06-08 21:11:34+00:00): Hello, according to the website of this company (https://www.yorkspacesystems.com/contact) this business is at this address. Can you please expand on why it was "incorrectly placed" and why you preferred to delete instead of moving it? Tell me if I should restore this node.
InsertUser (2023-04-08 06:52:20+00:00): Hello again. I don't see a source on this one, are you visiting Eleuthera?

PS a few of these now have a name tag and a noname=yes tag.
389574990
Canyonsrcool (2023-04-08 18:05:36+00:00): Hi , I was reviewing my pictures and notes from when I was here in 2016 and found I missed a few segments.  I'll fix the noname tags.  I hope to visit again soon!
CRCulver (2024-05-24 14:34:22+00:00): highway=crossing, crossing=traffic_signals nodes in Nukus are in the wrong place. You added them where pedestrians would stand and wait to cross. However, the standard practice all over the world is to place these nodes on the street, at the intersection with the highway=footway, footway=crossing. Please help me in cleaning up these erroneous Nukus pedestrian crossings.
emersonveenstra (2023-04-15 18:30:33+00:00): Hi,

Can you please fix the access tag here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1160617186

Thanks!
hatul (2023-05-18 15:32:52+00:00): תודה רבה על התרומות למפה. דרגיות אפשר לסמן בתור סולם, אבל לא בתור אטרקציה.
Onzd (2023-05-19 04:17:34+00:00): אני זוכר ששיחקתי עם זה לא התכוונתי בכלל להשאיר במפה
היה לי דיון עם זאב והוא אמר דרגיות וסולמות צריכים להיות כשכבה במפה 
אודה לך אם תמחק זאת . זה היה משחק ללא כוונה להעלות בכלל למפה.  אחכה שמישהו יעשה שכבה שכזו הבנתי שהנושא בדיונים
hatul (2023-05-19 06:19:12+00:00): הפכתי את הנקודה לתגית ladder=yes כמו שמתאים.
תודה
Onzd (2023-05-19 06:21:53+00:00): אחלה 
אני לא אסמן יותר דרגיות סולמות עד שלא תהיה שכבה שקופה
BCNorwich (2023-04-08 07:31:26+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Thanks for adding the data to OSM. Those are Highway Authority reference numbers for public rights of way rather than names. I've made amendments.

Regards Bernard.
ma-rt-in (2023-10-12 16:13:03+00:00): Hallo,

warum genau hast du aus dem unspezifischen tag nun 5 Rettungswachen gemacht?
fx99 (2023-10-12 16:35:20+00:00): Weil protected_area (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area) absolute nicht gepasst hat und ich für einen RTW "Abstellplatz" nichts besseres fand.
ma-rt-in (2023-10-12 16:37:48+00:00): Ok. Ich würde das tatsächlich entfernen, da die Standorte mMn nichts in OSM zu tun haben.
fx99 (2023-10-12 19:00:00+00:00): Ich würde sie nicht entfernen: vor Ort sicher sichtbar und im Rahmen der Rennstrecke sinnvoll.
Falsernet (2023-04-30 05:02:49+00:00): Hi, what did you delete in this changeset?

I also must note that nothing about the existing tagging excluded bicycles - cycleway tagging is just used to identify explicitly designated cycle routes. bicycle=yes on highway=footway/path/track is more appropriate where there are no blue signs or council-published cycle route maps.
chrisgofaster (2023-04-30 05:32:35+00:00): I thought that but other apps would never route through here so I changed to make it simpler.  I joined the cycle path to either side of the canal. Thanks for getting back
Shaun das Schaf (2023-04-12 08:02:45+00:00): Hallo melay,

der von dir eingetragene Spielplatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10794660289 war bereits vorhanden als https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/590667430

Bitte entferne den von dir eingetragenen Spielplatz wieder.

Danke und viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
user_5359 (2023-04-09 15:06:56+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1160618769. What is the meaning of the tags
cobi:rdend:re_id = 56
cobi:rdend:row = 30-foot wide right of way down a partially-maintained trail to the shore, used regularly for organized walks to the petroglyphs located on the beach to the north. Parking is restricted to Agate Point Road NE and North Street NE.
cobi:rdend:row:source = Road Ends file at Bainbridge Island Public Library
cobi:rdend:tidelands = Public tidelands in front of right of way.
?
tobych (2023-04-09 19:00:36+00:00): Hi George. Looks like you're running an automated QA tool that is noticing undocumented tags. Well, good quetion. I made these tags up, but haven't yet documented them: partly because I wasn't sure whether it was a good idea to even use them, and wanted to see how I felt about it. Also given that they're specific to the island, I really wasn't sure how much documentation I should bother writing on the OSM Wiki, if any. I've only used them on this one way so far, I think. So "cobi" is for City of Bainbridge Island. I don't work for the city: it's just where I live. And "rdend" is short for "Road End", or to be complete, "Public Road End". That's the phrase the City uses to describe these protected areas on the island that were once or were planned to be roads down to the sea. They're often where ferries used to stop, before more roads inland were built, and a bridge to the mainland was built. Okay so the tags are really just copies of data that should be elsewhere. The city has a database, and I have a spreadsheet I'm using as I map each of the 60-or-so Road Ends. But of course I want just '''one''' tag at least, that can reference a list elsewhere. If there's a way of doing that using an existing tag, I'd rather be doing that, of course, than adding an unnecessary tag. Okay so "row" is a copy of the text in the "RIGHT OF WAY" field in the city's table of Road Ends. And "tidelands" is the text from the "TIDELANDS" row.

I thought it'd be good to have this data available to others. Ideally without unnecessary duplication. The city does have a ArcGIS account, and some of the data about Road Ends is in there. I could put each Road End into Wikidata, but my understanding is that there shouldn't really be anything in the official Wikidata dataset that isn't also on Wikipedia, which by implies it meets the notoriety criteria to end up in there. And I doubt that a collection of a few tens of yards of mud track on an island is sufficiently notorious to meet that criteria. Although having said that, an epic legal battle around access to one of them - Fletcher Bay Landing - ended up in the Washington State surpreme court, so there's that! There are several others that the city had to fight hard to make available to the public when the Road Ends were first organized about twenty years ago. That's a long answer. It's probably best I talk to my local OSM group about this rather than bother a some bloke in Germany who's just trying to keep OSM from falling apart. And I can do that, and point them to this discussion! Thanks for all the work you do on OSM.
mueschel (2023-04-18 10:10:41+00:00): It seems that all the text in the tags is too much information for OSM. Do the entries in this database have reference numbers? In this case the natural thing would be to add it in a 'ref:US:WA:cobi' tag.


Btw, what is the license of this data? Is it compatible with ODbL and OSM?
Yunan973 (2023-08-10 22:20:53+00:00): Hi,

why did you keep the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11030138 with no member : do you need it for later ?

Best regards
Yunan973 (2023-08-11 22:21:21+00:00): Hi,

why did you keep the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10974426 with no member : do you need it for later ?

Best regards
suchAnight (2023-04-24 20:46:18+00:00): Hello, O Fim. I noticed that on some of the destination signs you have been adding the tags with a “Via” before the cited destination such as in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/214910977 ; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230622301 ; & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/942244334 .
However, there is no ‘Via’ in recent corresponding street level images of these signs ( https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=529249162532668 ; https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=521191756628916 ; & https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=116404733448098 ).
The OSMwiki explains “The value of the destination tag should be the contents of the sign, as it would be read from beginning to end.” ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination ). From my reading of the OSMwiki policy on the value portion of the destination tag, these ‘Via’ mentions should not be included. I am curious if you agree with this? Thank you for your consideration.
O Fim (2023-04-24 21:01:06+00:00): Em nossa região usamos via como abreviação de rodovia, aqui e facilmente compreendido por todos os usuários , eu poderia usar Rodovia Anhanguera por ex: mas não vejo necessidade , outros tipos de abreviações  que eu corrigi não devem ser usadas pois atrapalham qdo usadas em GPS  como por exemplo Pto freg. Ó ou seja Ponte freguesia do Ó .
suchAnight (2023-04-24 23:53:32+00:00): O Fim, obrigado por dedicar seu tempo para esclarecer. Tenha um bom dia.
suchAnight (2023-04-24 23:53:49+00:00): O Fim, thank you for taking the time to clarify. Have a good day.
Jerry_W2k (2023-04-12 08:21:08+00:00): Świetna robota z płotami! ROD o wiele lepiej teraz się prezentuje
MxxCon (2023-04-08 15:22:41+00:00): Hello.
Why did you delete wikipedia and wikidata tags?

For w803981807, shouldn't "Midday Yard Lead" be part of a description or note tags, since as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions name tags shouldn't be used for descriptions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134639630
clay_c (2023-04-08 15:36:43+00:00): The Midday Yard Lead should just have that alone as the name.

How come the Midday Yard lead was changed from service=yard to usage=main?
clay_c (2023-04-08 15:38:56+00:00): Also, could you please clarify what LIRR ETT SI GO 102 is, and where we can find it?
RailandSea (2023-04-08 16:28:32+00:00): Employee Timetable special Instructions book. Shows Plaza to MID as main track for track 4 (midday yard lead) 15 MPH. 

The wiki data was forcing the East Side Access name and locking out the track from being renamed to GCB.
MxxCon (2023-04-08 16:53:37+00:00): What is the link to that book? How can other people see and verify it?
Even if iD doesn't let you edit name(but it does in the tags section below) it's not a good reason to delete perfectly valid tags.🫤
RailandSea (2023-04-08 16:59:28+00:00): yes but the tags are grabbing data with the incorrect name, things change over there years from that project, its a printed book there's no link but it but i can gladly send you the pictures of the information from it. the other rail lines don't have that problem and the names can be edited and updated without trouble. just trying to updated the track to reflect the current information of the railroads.
clay_c (2023-04-08 17:41:36+00:00): Do you work for the LIRR? If so, it's important to make sure the information you're adding is copyright-compatible with OpenStreetMap. If the timetable has a copyright notice on it, please ask LIRR management or lawyers for written confirmation that it's okay to use it as a source for OpenStreetMap.

If you can get written confirmation, we'd love to see photos or scans of the relevant info. Copyright-compatible sources are hard to come by in railway mapping, so this would be immensely helpful for us all.
clay_c (2023-04-08 17:51:00+00:00): As for the Wikidata item, Q937694 represents the East Side Access construction project. Now that construction is over and it's in service, it needs a new Wikidata item for the Grand Central Branch anyway. So deleting it may have been a mistake, but it wasn't a big deal in this case.
julcnx (2024-04-24 08:50:34+00:00): Hey, thank you for your contributions! I noticed you've marked some roads as 'living_street.' One tip for future edits: you should tag these as 'highway=residential' instead. This is because there aren't any rules in Thailand that specifically lower speed limits or give pedestrians priority in residential areas.
You can read more about this on the Thailand wiki. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Cheers
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Urban_and_Local_Road_wide_enough_for_motor_cars
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134639646
limes11 (2023-04-12 21:41:13+00:00): Hi

sieht das wirklich heute fischförmig aus? Stimmt die Form auf den Luftbildern nicht mehr?

VG
renminbo (2023-04-13 12:58:58+00:00): Das sah bis zu meiner Änderung fischförmig und riesig aus. War vor über 2 Jahren von FelixTech mit der Anmerkung "Gebäudeänderung" so hinterlassen worden. Ich denke, ein Scherz. Finde ich ja witzig (gibt's bei Google immer wieder), aber nicht in der Größe. Also habe ich den Fisch verkleinert und nicht ganz korrigiert. Wenn du willst, ändere es gerne. Du siehst ja, ich wusste nicht, wie damit umgehen.
limes11 (2023-04-13 16:30:58+00:00): So, habe den Fisch wieder rechteckig gemacht. 

Ja, der Nutzer hatte nur 8 Changesets und das letzte hieß "Test" - War wohl nicht ernst gemeint.

VG
Tatfahren (2023-04-08 16:41:47+00:00): Quelle: Esri Luftbilder.
Tatfahren (2023-04-08 16:40:49+00:00): Quelle: Esri Luftbilder, kein survey
hatul (2023-05-07 14:48:13+00:00): איפה המאגר העליון, לא הצלחתי למצוא אותו במפה.
בכל מקרה, עדיף לתייג בתור מאגר ולא אטרקציה.
PT-53 (2023-04-08 08:02:49+00:00): Hallo ramack,
Du hast diesen Weg
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1160629817/history
neu eingezeichnet. Dieser überdeckt teilweise diesen Weg:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/275967042/history
Das sollte nicht sein.

Und was ist mit dieser Brücke:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568545019/history
Ist die weg?

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?

Grüße mit Bitte um Rückmeldung. 
Bitte hierzu den Änderungssatz 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134641174#map=19/47.95421/9.65095
aufrufen und die Antwort unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.
ramack (2023-04-08 08:33:13+00:00): Habe das von unterwegs gemacht aber auf dem Handy ist es nicht einfach das korrekt einzuzeichnen. Wenn du gerade am PC sitzt korrigiere es gerne.

Die alte Brücke ist noch da, aber gesperrt. Ich vermute sie wird irgendwann abgebaut, aber wer weiß.
PT-53 (2023-04-08 08:49:54+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe die Wege-Überlappung beseitigt und access=no an der gesperrten Brücke ergänzt.

Grüße und Danke für die Rückmeldung
ramack (2023-04-08 08:55:27+00:00): 👍