piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
crawllp (2024-04-26 23:15:31+00:00): https://forgotten-ny.com/2011/03/columbia-waterfront-brooklyn/


https://forgotten-ny.com/2008/10/hail-columbia-street/

Correct. I was using Google Street view for past dates and appears that the sign on the pole fell off or was removed during construction work on that side of the street. There is still a dead end sign behind the gates.
MxxCon (2024-04-26 23:19:47+00:00): Please note that you can NOT under any circumstances use Google Streetview or Maps to map in OSM! It is a copyright violation and a breach of ToS with both Google and OSM.
crawllp (2024-04-27 00:32:42+00:00): Oh my bad I forgot.
Friendly_Ghost (2024-04-23 16:15:31+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150404272
Friendly_Ghost (2024-04-23 16:14:14+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150404216
rik_ (2024-04-25 14:09:56+00:00): Hallo,

du hast den kombinierten Rad-/Fußweg zwischen Schenkendorf und Mittenwalde auf `highway=footway` umgetaggt.

Das ist IMHO nicht das richtige Tagging, da es kein Fußweg mit erlaubter Fahrradnutzung (DE:239,1022-10) ist. Der Weg ist an allen Stellen mit DE:240 ausgeschildert. So gesehen ist

highway=path
bicycle=designated
foot=designated

korrekt. Vgl. auch die Wiki-Seite [1].

Wenn ich hier irgendetwas übersehen haben sollte, wäre ich über Aufklärung dankbar.

Viele Grüße

rik


[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dcycleway#Deutschland
Kovoschiz (2024-04-23 16:10:58+00:00): Please stop deleting and redrawing randomly. You are removing info as well.
woodpeck (2024-04-23 11:55:10+00:00): Hallo teatime456, offensichtlich bist Du für irgendeine Stelle stätig, bei der Beschwerden von Grundbesitzern auflaufen, und versuchst dann, diese Beschwerden in OSM umzusetzen. Bitte nutze Dein OSM-Userprofil (https://www.openstreetmap.org/profile/edit), um zu erklären, für wen Du tätig bist und welche Schritte Du unternimmst, um die Behauptungen von Grundbesitzern auf ihre Richtigkeit zu überprüfen.
fortera_au (2024-04-23 09:59:40+00:00): Hey, it's probably best to use a lifestyle prefix to mark as disused, you'd be setting disused:highway=path and removing highway=path. If there's no access signs, probably worth adding an access=no tag too!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150385609
MxxCon (2024-04-26 03:25:17+00:00): Hello.
Rather than listing all the separate credit cards and then unfairly highlighting apple pay, you can simply tag this as credit cards, debit cards and contactless.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150385987
rik_ (2024-04-25 14:32:35+00:00): Hallo,

ich schon wieder.

An der Fahrradstraße zwischen Mittenwalde und Gallun Müllerhaus hast du Änderungen durchgeführt, die so nicht den Best Practices aus dem Wiki entsprechen.

Bitte schau dir die Seite im Wiki an: [1]. Ich werde die Änderungen an der Fahrradstraße zurücksetzen.

Viele Grüße

rik


[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:bicycle_road%3Dyes
miluethi (2024-04-28 18:06:59+00:00): Sofia,
you are duplicating "landuse=residental" in certain area. The village boundary includes already the landuse tag.
I'm deleting your boundaries.
miluethi (2024-04-28 18:04:22+00:00): Hi Pallavi,
Many of your building shapes are far too large. Just match the satellite imagery.
By selecting a building shape and press the "Q" key, you can square out all buildings.
Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-23 10:59:52+00:00): Czy w jakiś sposób to zwyfikowałeś czy https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3271235 jest prawdziwa?
bartgron (2024-04-23 11:27:16+00:00): Patrzyłem na GSV i faktycznie wszystko się zgadza, nawierzchnia jest również widoczna na orto
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-23 12:05:36+00:00): Nie możemy korzystać z GSV
bartgron (2024-04-23 12:15:03+00:00): Ale na orto też widać nawierzchnię, co najwyżej nie widać ograniczenia prędkości
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-29 11:57:56+00:00): 

Nie możemy korzystać z GSV - również jeśli część lub wszystkie wiadomości zostały zwerifikowane dodatkowo z innych źródeł
bartgron (2024-04-29 18:52:11+00:00): Czyli dopóki tam osobiście nie pojadę to nic nie mogę zrobić?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-09 13:42:03+00:00): Nie, są też inne sposoby. Ale z GSV korzystać nie można, nawet jak by to pomogło
bartgron (2024-05-09 13:47:53+00:00): Jakie są te inne sposoby?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-09 18:36:36+00:00): Bing Maps Street View może być wykorzystany (nie wiem czy w Polsce występuje)

Można wysłać kogoś innego

Dane o znakach czasem można wyssać od władz lokalnych
bartgron (2024-05-09 22:21:30+00:00): Zweryfikowałem na Bingu i moje zmiany są poprawne ;)
joel56dt (2024-05-04 04:55:00+00:00): Hello,

Please square the buildings after you draw them. You can do this in the iD editor by selecting the shape and pressing 'Q'. Right now the buildings are weird shapes because they have not been squared.

Thanks,
joel56dt
miluethi (2024-04-28 18:10:06+00:00): Hi Krishan,

Your buildings are to large and not precise. Please match with your building shape exactly the sat imagery. Also use the "Q" key to square our buildings.
Thank you.
miluethi (2024-04-28 17:42:54+00:00): Hi Palakmaheshwari,
Can you please square out buildings whenever possible. Just press the "Q" after finishing a building shape.
Thank you
aTarom (2024-04-24 14:46:37+00:00): Hola, no es aceptable eliminar información totalmente válida con conocimiento local de 12 años de antigüedad como
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164254206/history
para sustituirlo por dos simples tags en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1275251343/history
El historial se debe respetar y más cuando se trata de usuarios locales, usar este tipo de tácticas engorda con colesterol del malo la Base de Datos; ruego respuesta de aclaración para dicha eliminación
BaboucheVerte (2024-04-24 05:03:46+00:00): HI, thanks for your edit, but way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1275253737 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1275458428 are not connected each other, they are both connected to the wall instead, thus breaking the routing
user_21183540 (2024-04-24 08:41:47+00:00): Hey, I have just connected the footpath. Does it look fine now?
BaboucheVerte (2024-04-24 09:54:58+00:00): Not totally, the turnstill weren't at the point where the path cross the barrier, I fixed it there : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150436016
user_21183540 (2024-04-24 10:57:23+00:00): Thanks for the fix (though I didn't quite get what you fixed 😅)
BaboucheVerte (2024-04-24 12:17:11+00:00): the turnstill were only on the way of the barrier, now it's at the point where the path cross the barrier : see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier
Noktoborus (2024-04-29 13:41:10+00:00): Здравствуйте.

А какой именно здесь bugfix? Опишите, пожалуйста, подробнее что именно Вы здесь исправили.

Проанализировав правку я вижу только добавление highway=traffic_signals в точках пересечения для путей, которые уже имеют highway=traffic_signals.
Leo Slager (2024-04-23 15:16:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
user_5359 (2024-04-24 09:40:48+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Laut Webseite (bitte mit eintragen, zur Nachvollziehbarkeit) ist die offizielle Adresse bei Hausnr 30. Bitte um Korrektur, Verschiebung und Ergänzung.
miluethi (2024-04-23 19:43:03+00:00): Hey Kimmi, please square out building shapes by pressing the "Q" key in the iD editor.
Thank you!
eMerzh (2024-04-24 06:23:28+00:00): Hello :) 
C'est super de voir un peu de mouvement côté waterloo :) 
beau travail :)

Je vois que de nombreux bâtiments sont ajoutés, ils proviennent du PICC j'imagine ? Idéalement, garder l'Id de celui-ci permettrait des futures mises à jour (comme décrit dans la page d'import du PICC)

Bonne continuation

Brice
Schum10 (2024-04-24 06:48:15+00:00): Bonjour,

oui en effet j'utilise toujours le PICC pour toutes mes modifications dans OSM ;)
J'avoue que je n'ai pas lu cette déscription de la page d'import, je vais suivre vos conseils et m'y intéresser dans ce cas ;)
Merci pour votre soutien.

Marc
Hugoren Martinako (2024-04-23 19:47:27+00:00): Buenas,

Si añades nombre a las aceras (tampoco es necesario), asegúrate de diferenciar los nombres de las calles, dividiéndola en tramos. Por ejemplo:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1238856536

Saludos
Barrunterio (2024-04-23 19:57:23+00:00): Buenas,
Tienes razón fusione rápido una vía y olvide la conexión, en otros changeset por la zona las vías están separadas para evitar este problema en específico.
Nada es necesario en cuanto añadir detalle.
Algunos programas usan los nombres de las calles para indicar giros en tramos de peatones y decir que en la acera tienes que girar hacia la acera se me hizo complejo.
Gracias por darte cuenta de este error.
Un saludo
CRCulver (2024-10-06 21:04:37+00:00): What is the source of these highway=motorway_junction tags all over Kyrgyzstan? I have not been able to verify any of these tags during on-the-ground surveys, and it is not common practice in the region to add them to trunk roads and primary highways.
TrickyFoxy (2024-04-28 19:32:56+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150633728
Leo Slager (2024-04-23 15:19:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Taya_S (2024-04-23 17:48:38+00:00): Hi,

Are you sure this is a building? It looks more like a platform and closely resembles the areas mapped here https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-28.71513/113.78905

Sincerely,
Taya
Leo Slager (2024-04-23 15:23:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-24 21:43:50+00:00): For changes of this magnitude you really should be releasing your sources for review.
kmarkish_lyft (2024-04-29 10:45:08+00:00): Hi, Spaghetti Monster!  
My name is Kate, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. 
These changes were made according to the Nearmap background and Lyft telemetry data (automated pipelines that detect driver activity) https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Kf918N-_6oEkPv4FLyOy9N2zQp91nUMY/view?usp=drive_link 
We realize the volume of the edits and understand the importance of releasing sources for review, especially for changes of this magnitude. We found GPS tracks activity in a different location which confirms the findings at official sources.
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 15:31:11+00:00): Reverted
Szymson (2024-04-23 18:22:16+00:00): Węzeł jest dopiero w budowie, po co ta zmiana tagowania?
Szymson (2024-04-23 18:23:19+00:00): Nie ma jeszcze w terenie znaków z numerem węzła.
Szymson (2024-04-23 18:24:36+00:00): Zgodnie z: https://www.gov.pl/web/gddkia/wprowadzamy-docelowe-nazwy-wezlow
ref=5 jest jak najbardziej prawidłowe
:-} (2024-04-24 04:59:15+00:00): To skoro jest prawidłowe, to czemu wycofałeś, i sporotem jest błędny numer?...
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:42:37+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 15:49:09+00:00): Reverted
Gregory Peony (2024-04-27 15:00:36+00:00): Thank you for mapping but please be aware that building footprints cannot physically overlap on the same layer. So even if you can't quite work out the arangment/shape of buildings. Know that they should not overlap. Please press q when mapping buildings with square corners.
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:26:57+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:08:31+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:19:40+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 15:50:26+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:59:55+00:00): Reverted
Negreheb (2024-04-26 06:35:54+00:00): Servus, danke für die Hilfe, aber bitte nicht einfach löschen, wenn etwas geschlossen hat. Das Geschäftslokal existiert noch und vor allem steht draussen noch überall "zum heurigen Fassl" auf der Fassade und auf allen Schildern. Ich habs revertiert und dann korrekt eingetragen https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150522642

Relevante Seiten:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dvacant und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused als prefix. Eins der beiden reicht eig. auch.
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:27:02+00:00): Reverted
maro21 (2024-04-24 19:32:43+00:00): Tagi source lepiej dawać na zestawie zmian, nie na obiekcie.

Co to znaczy abandoned:highway=primary?
Dawid2849 (2024-04-26 16:46:26+00:00): Ja bym tego znacznika nie dodawał, żeby routingi nie myślały, że tej drogi nie ma
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:59:57+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 15:49:05+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:11:56+00:00): Reverted
rskedgell (2024-04-23 13:20:57+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please try to keep your edits to a smaller geographical area and use a more meaningful changeset comment.

You may find the documentation linked below helpful.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Changing highway=footway to highway=path does not "correct" anything, it simply makes access more ambiguous. Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#United_Kingdom

I have restored the original tagging on these paths in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150395654

You may wish to gain a little more experience before deciding, on your first edit, that all the other mappers who edited the footpaths in Nonsuch Park tagged them incorrectly.
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:42:33+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 15:00:00+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:42:19+00:00): Reverted
Syl (2024-04-23 15:23:59+00:00): Bonjour, je ne comprends pas cette modification. La comédie n'est plus dans le bâtiment ?
Syl (2024-04-30 19:58:38+00:00): Bonsoir, j'ai vérifié sur place et je n'ai rien vu qui justifie votre modification.
Je l'ai annulé et j'ai ajouté l'entrée du bâtiment (j'ai l'impression que c'est peut-être ça que vous vouliez indiquer).
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 15:50:23+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:59:35+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 15:00:03+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 15:48:48+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:37:00+00:00): Reverted.

entrance tags on a POI are ambiguous, they have 2 doors.  We assumed Treurenberg 4
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2485390707
TOF-46011030 (2024-04-25 17:25:37+00:00): Hello Bxl-Forever, thanks for your "newbies link", and also the fixes on my contributions. I'd prefer my additions are "first-time-right", but in fact I interacted with OSM through the "on wheels" application, giving me no control on the points i was tagging. There might be an option to discuss directly with them, in a way the POI they want to document through their app are directly the correct ones in OSM ?
All in all i'm very interested in the OSM features, and when time allows i'll dive a bit deeper :-)
bxl-forever (2024-04-25 22:32:33+00:00): Hi and welcome.
Yes, you might have been surprised to see all the notifications, on Tuesday.  This is caused by a problem with the current version of the On Wheels app: when people use this app, the data they collected goes to OSM… but erases everything else, which makes the map unusuable because existing data about shops such as opening hours, website or phone number disappears.  So we had to clean every edit one by one.  We are in contact with Robin and the devs, to see how to fix their app as soon as possible.
Your contributions are welcome, and as you can see, we restored previous data from the backups, while merging it with the valuable data you collected.
Have a nice day.
Skylark_H_C (2024-04-23 13:54:34+00:00): According to the direction signposts near 22.35629/113.50818 and 22.36343/113.51234 set up in 2024
The names of roads in this area can be quite perplexing.
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:59:38+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:27:07+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:59:43+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 15:49:53+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:27:12+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 15:49:56+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 15:48:53+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:59:46+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:27:22+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:41:48+00:00): Reverted
silversurfer83 (2024-04-23 13:20:03+00:00): Hello there :)

thank you for contributing to OSM. Two things I'd like to point out and kindly ask you to consider in the future:

- please give meaningful comments on your changes. It helps others and also yourself when trying to understand what you are doing
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

- also please rememberg to save and upload changes before moving around the map. I only saw this edit of yours because it created a bounding box that covers the area I watch out for.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

safe travels and happy mapping
silversurfer83
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 15:48:57+00:00): Reverted
Pink Duck (2024-09-25 11:56:34+00:00): I don't get this. The road is within the A146 boundary. It should have the name of the parent road. It acts as a link from trunk to tertiary, therefore is a trunk_link, which it has been for the past 14 years. You made it tertiary (there is no official C ref), removed the name and the parent road reference.
Nathan_A_RF (2024-09-25 12:12:45+00:00): If you wish to alter the names, go ahead. I tied up the road classification based upon the status of the roads they connect to/from (the tertiary and secondary). Note that tertiary roads do not have to follow a C-route also.
Pink Duck (2024-09-25 14:12:10+00:00): Trunk_link is also intended for channelised  (physically separated by an obstruction) at-grade turning lanes connecting the through carriageways/through lanes. The road itself visually looks like significant infrastructure unlike a tertiary road. I'm well aware that council C-road classification does not necessarily equate tertiary in OSM, if only because their own grading is frequently outdated. Am curious what prompted you to make the change in the first place. Was there something beneficial? Such as navigation routing agent behaviours?
Nathan_A_RF (2024-09-25 16:56:51+00:00): The tagging of highways here was a mess, as links at junctions in the UK are mainly the status of the lower class road, except for slip roads. If you feel some of these should be secondary or tertiary links please change, I only saw this briefly as I was making other unrelated edits. and had to fix it.
Pink Duck (2024-09-27 11:09:18+00:00): Will just point out at-grade "Internal turning lanes" from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link - specifically "They should be tagged with the _link classification of the highest classified road they connect to."
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 15:49:03+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:59:49+00:00): Reverted
eggie (2024-05-08 06:05:58+00:00): Beste Padvinder. Blijf svp van de oevers af met editor GoMap.
MVG
eggie
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 15:50:01+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:41:59+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:59:52+00:00): Reverted
eggie (2024-04-23 13:45:28+00:00): Dag yjk

In het begin wordt wel gescreend.. uiteraard om te helpen. 
Let even op de format van de verschillende verkeersborden
NL met hoofdletters
Je edits NL:C15
Kijk je nog even? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden&direction=next&oldid=984258#C:_Geslotenverklaring

MVG
eggie
dannmer (2024-05-13 16:31:54+00:00): Thanks for adding the trails!
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:42:29+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 15:50:04+00:00): Reverted
Bart- (2024-04-23 14:51:02+00:00): Why is this changeset so large?
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:41:45+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 15:01:29+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 15:50:08+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 15:01:33+00:00): Reverted
richlv (2024-04-23 18:29:49+00:00): Sveiki, liels paldies par interesi par OpenStreetMap.
Kāds ir pamatojums šīm izmaiņām?
Ir_jau_aizņemts_vārds (2024-04-24 05:48:10+00:00): Labrīt!

Strādāju Latvijas Ģeotelpiskajā informācijas aģentūrā. Bija lūgums no Aizsardzības Ministrijas šādu informāciju neattēlot. Līdzīgi kā citām līdzīgām vietām.
richlv (2024-04-24 22:47:50+00:00): Liels paldies par atbildi. Šobrīd gan ar šāda veida izmaiņām ir dažādas problēmas, piemēram:

1. Šī ir publiska, oficiāli izplatīta informācija: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/143599-par-nacionalo-brunoto-speku-vienibu-izvietojumu-miera-laikam
2. Organizāciju veiktām izmaiņām un ar tām saistītajiem kontiem jāseko noteiktām vadlīnijām - https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines .

Sazināšos privātā ziņā kā Data Working Group dalībnieks, lai precizētu turpmāku sadarbību ar LĢIA.
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 15:50:19+00:00): Reverted
eggie (2024-04-23 13:55:33+00:00): Dag yjk  Ik heb motor_vehicle=designated verwijderd.
Dat is default op wegen.
Zou het niet gewoon layer=-1 zijn?
Het gaat erom hoe de weg zich tot de andere (spoor)weg verhoudt.
.. layer=-2 zou het pas worden als er daaronder weer een weg zou kruisen.
MVG
eggie
yjk12 (2024-04-26 13:49:24+00:00): Je hebt gelijk over de layers, maar voetpad ligt duidelijk hoger in de tunnelbak en wilde dat ook aangeven. Hoe zou dit wel kunnen?
eggie (2024-04-26 14:27:55+00:00): Je zou een talud kunnen intekenen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dembankment

Dat kan ook op meer manieren. 
Voorbeeld https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.76932/4.65562
bxl-forever_repair (2024-04-23 15:02:19+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 15:30:41+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:41:42+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:59:32+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 15:49:21+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 14:59:29+00:00): Reverted
bxl-forever (2024-04-23 15:00:11+00:00): Reverted
Rukkhadevata (2024-05-23 15:51:16+00:00): 您好，请问您是处于何种考量删除了此节点？（胶南确实已于2012年撤销，但其建成区仍独立于黄岛区本体，故作为试验设置）
Re1na (2024-05-30 18:28:21+00:00): 地图标注位置为黄岛区政府，胶南市已不存在，目前仅存在胶南街道，且胶南街道不在此位置。
eggie (2024-04-23 13:58:08+00:00): Hoi Je vraagt feedback
Lijkt me oke
Ik heb de oude tagging met tracktype=grade4 teruggezet. Die had ik ook verwijderd want dat riep een foutmelding op.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-04-23 14:05:59+00:00): Volgens de BGT/Kadaster kloppen momenteel de straatnamen niet.
Vanaf BAGadres Ter Laan  nr 20 naar het zuiden vanaf de Fraamweg zou de Terlaansterkleiweg zijn (en niet Ter Laan) . Die komt dan uit de Ter laan.
Wellicht iets om even naar te kijken.


https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=236556.82&geometry.y=592886.19&zoomlevel=11.05

Wellicht iets om even naar te kijken hoe het nu echt zit en/of een opmerking te zetten op Verbeterdekaart.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-04-23 14:08:43+00:00): Het stuk (track) wat je nu van disused hebt gehaald heet in de BGT overigens Ter Laan. Dat zou het BAG adres verklaren van nr 20?
Iets om uit te zoeken want nu mist hier een straatnaam.
yjk12 (2024-04-26 14:03:52+00:00): Ik meen in het verleden wel een straatnaambordje zien staan van Terlaanster kleiweg, maar ik dacht dat dit een grap was van de eigenaar (komt vaker voor). Dit is echter een pad om bij het land te komen, niet een pad voor openbaar gebruik.
Zie ook (gesloten) opmerking op de kaart.
Deze weg staat voor iedereen die hier bekend is Ter Laan, maar niet iedereen weet waar wat ophoudt. Gezien een bord dat vanaf de Fraamweg zichtbaar is kan ik niet anders dan concluderen dat Ter Laan 20 het juiste adres is, niet Terlaansterkleiweg 20 (of welk nummer ook). Als de Terlaansterkleiweg officieel bestaat heeft dit geen adressen (meer).