piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-27 21:20:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11938067259
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4440343064
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/560655256
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1287199984

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-27 21:20:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11938160408
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/560572695

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-27 21:20:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11938148454
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/560572692

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-27 21:20:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11938218933
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11938218932
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1117642195
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/561894484

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
nevw (2024-05-27 21:45:53+00:00): Hi, welcome to osm.
I have reverted you changeset because you have dragged a couple of points on the map to incorrect positions.
You also need to map your business over the building it operates from instead of the roadway. 
You need to add a primary tag to define what it is you are adding to the map.
I suggest shop=party maybe suitable
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dparty
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-27 21:20:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11938228659
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/561894470

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-27 21:20:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11938235079
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1089122703

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Patalakki (2025-01-15 14:52:04+00:00): Moro! Miksi poistit vt 2:n Nummelan eritasoliittymän maisemapylväältä monumentti-tunnisteen?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1887232237
marczoutendijk (2025-09-21 12:05:22+00:00): Hoi,
Hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4070149705/history/2
heb je een fixme met de tekst: "bestaat dit adres nog"
Wat maakt dat je twijfelt?
Groet,
Marc
Friendly_Ghost (2025-09-22 11:15:56+00:00): Hoi Marc,

Meestal zet ik deze note tag neer als een gebouw gesloopt is. Ik kan me verder deze specifieke situatie niet herinneren.

Mvg,
Casper
tastrax (2024-05-28 05:57:32+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Adam_Piszczek (2024-05-28 06:59:07+00:00): Gdzie masz ten szlaban w terenie? jak go nie ma tam.
Maciej9 (2024-05-28 07:45:20+00:00): Jest, wczoraj sprawdzałem
Maciej9 (2024-05-28 07:48:09+00:00): Z dokładnością do kilkunastu metrów, może być bliżej skrzyżowania niż na mapie
Frans S (2024-06-08 08:30:54+00:00): Here you did not tag the buildings as well.
Tags building=yes, added by another mapper.
Don't add a layer to buildings to hide an error.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151920064
Frans S (2024-06-08 08:29:16+00:00): Here you did not tag the buildings as well.
Tags building=yes, added by another mapper.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151920146
Frans S (2024-06-08 08:28:33+00:00): Here you did not tag the buildings as well.
Tags building=yes, added,
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151920365
fortera_au (2024-06-04 02:54:27+00:00): Hi, Google Maps isn't allowed as a source, was this verified using any other source/in person?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151920377
fortera_au (2024-06-04 02:54:14+00:00): Hi, Google Maps isn't allowed as a source, was this verified using any other source/in person?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151920395
miluethi (2024-06-10 13:00:26+00:00): Hi Claire,

I'm going to delete your buildings shapes in Siuna. They are far bigger than the satellite imagery.
Please stop adding useless names to buildings.
Xvtn (2024-05-29 20:19:53+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! It looks like there's already a nearby trailhead feature, just north of here. Is that the one you had in mind when adding this? Let me know. And thanks for your contribution!
Yulcat (2024-05-29 22:31:18+00:00): Yes you are right.  Apologies
Xvtn (2024-05-29 23:39:47+00:00): No worries. I removed the duplicate.
redd (2024-06-22 13:28:20+00:00): Hallo Defikarte,

bitte statt level=EG an die üblichen level-Werte halten level=0 für Erdgeschoss. Alternativ kann auch level:ref=EG verwendet werden, wenn vor Ort das Erdgeschoss so angeschrieben ist.

Vielen dank, 

Redd!
chnuessli (2024-07-05 18:24:31+00:00): Wurde geändert.
redd (2024-07-05 19:46:07+00:00): Super, danke
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-31 23:35:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152101664 where the changeset comment is: reverted road and place reclassifications by cm81447 that were made without explanation or discussion
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-31 07:50:34+00:00): Before you make further changes, please read:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-31 23:35:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152101664 where the changeset comment is: reverted road and place reclassifications by cm81447 that were made without explanation or discussion
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-31 23:35:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152101664 where the changeset comment is: reverted road and place reclassifications by cm81447 that were made without explanation or discussion
Xvtn (2024-05-29 20:21:38+00:00): Hmm, if one is good, two must be better!
Davileci (2024-07-01 06:15:39+00:00): Ya existe un nodo para la estación de tren y otro para la de metro. Para marcar el intercambiador es mejor la relación de grupo de las zonas de parada que la clave "intercambiador", que no existe.
HABmaps (2026-03-24 12:49:33+00:00): Es un cambio que no edite, el nodo quedo dentro de una área de edición. Estas mas informado que yo, recomiendo tu edición.
NeisBot (2024-05-28 00:51:24+00:00): Hi Studnicky, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1287248167

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
Studnicky (2024-05-28 01:02:30+00:00): https://cityofwinterpark.org/departments/parks-recreation/parks-playgrounds/parks/lake-baldwin-park/

"Lake Baldwin Park is a beautiful, shady park that covers 23.16 acres on Lake Baldwin. The park is one of two city parks which boasts a sandy beach. This park is the only park in the city known as “dog-friendly” – dogs may be off-leash during park hours of 8 a.m. to sunset."
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-28 05:15:51+00:00): Thanks for your answer 
and your mapped beach.

Looks good!

#HappyMapping
kapazao (2024-05-30 13:35:14+00:00): Hola, el helipuerto estaba situado correctamente. No se puede situar tal y como lo ves en la imagen por satélite, ya que está en la parte más alta del edificio, y este tiene una inclinación. Todo se debe dibujar sobre la base de este, que es como estaba.
Deberías revisar la capa de Catastro para ver por qué estaba dibujado así, donde aparece en el nivel 8.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151922998
kapazao (2024-05-30 13:36:03+00:00): Hola, ¿esta asignación de nombres a los helipuertos a qué se debe?
¿Realmente se llaman así, podrías dar referencias de esto?
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151923144
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-06-07 00:09:35+00:00): Landuse shouldn't be attached to roads
OldManCelli (2024-05-31 15:13:32+00:00): Hello Kegyah, Please don't delete buildings that are trying to represent actual buildings. It looks like you deleted a lot of ways and then replaced them with larger polygons that are not any better.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151923541
luisforte (2024-05-31 18:44:12+00:00): With buildings, user also deleted lots of information about the buildings itself and addresses.
Acording to his comments history, there are never replies and comments seem to be ignored.
Reverted.
Luis
felipeeugenio (2024-05-28 15:46:09+00:00): Por favor escribir con capitalización normal
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151923755
Jacobbrony (2024-05-28 04:00:11+00:00): im going to fix it to where it goes all the way up to the intersection
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 12:09:45+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152078129
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 12:09:53+00:00): Please don't add fictional map elements. Thank you!
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-28 04:25:42+00:00): Great work on your mapping. Keep contributing, Cheers! You can press Q when you finished building mapping for building orthogonalize shape or you can use building tool which does not need to reshape square.
#Review_Good #OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151924271
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151924271
Luzandro (2024-06-11 19:25:45+00:00): restored access values, see traffic_sign +  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106546431
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-28 05:01:31+00:00): Great work on your mapping. Keep contributing, Cheers! You can press Q when you finished building mapping for building orthogonalize shape or you can use building tool which does not need to reshape square.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151924541
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-28 04:47:01+00:00): Great work on your mapping. Keep contributing, Cheers! #Review_Good #OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151924600
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151924600
riiga (2024-05-28 19:23:14+00:00): Hi!

What did you base this edit on?

To my knowledge, there isn't any signed weight limit on this road, only signs forbidding some motor vehicles when over a certain weight, hence why I tagged it that way.
Jorisbo (2024-05-29 11:32:49+00:00): Hi Riiga, thanks for your reply. I actualy don't see the difference between the two? maxweight is the easiest and most common way to describe restrictions for vehicle weight, allowing all others. Using conditional 'legal access rights' is not wrong but makes it much more difficult for all kinds of Apps for making routing choices, because the syntax is rarely consistent enough. If you  have a problem with it motor_vehicle:conditional would then fit better in my opinion . Kind regards, Joris
riiga (2024-05-29 12:59:40+00:00): You are correct that it should be motor_vehicle:conditional instead, so I will correct that. Changing what was there to maxweight=3.5 is incorrect though, and I did revert that, but wanted to know if you had any local knowledge that I might've missed in my mapping of the access restriction.

For an explanation of how it's signed:
* No motor vehicles
* (over) 3.5 tonnes
* Does not apply to public transit buses

Hence a regular weight restriction is not the right way to go.
RedGreenBlue09 (2024-05-28 19:33:40+00:00): Have you read my new comments (on your older changeset) regarding this? This road is really unimportant. It doesn't serves so many vehicle and doesn't even have a traffic light intersection with Hồng Bàng.
RedGreenBlue09 (2024-05-28 19:35:14+00:00): If you love upgrading roads, I suggest Lê Quang Định and Phan Văn Trị, but not this one.
Joseph R P (2024-05-28 05:01:57+00:00): Hello, please slow down with your highway reclassifications here. It's one thing to change the classification of a highway or two, but there are some big, rapid, and undiscussed changes you are making all around the state and it's hard to keep track of what's going on. I recommend pausing these sort of edits so that these changes can be discussed with other editors, especially since you are creating and removing trunk routes.
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-31 23:35:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152101664 where the changeset comment is: reverted road and place reclassifications by cm81447 that were made without explanation or discussion
woodpeck (2024-05-31 23:38:54+00:00): Hello cm81447, it is highly unusual for a new contributor to OSM to embark on such a massive road re-classification scheme as you apparently have; and even more unusual to ignore requests of other mappers to take it slow and consider if maybe things are like they are for a reason! I've reverted your edits of the last four days, and I second Joseph's request above to discuss your plans before you execute them The community forum on community.openstreetmap.org is a good place for this.
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-28 05:29:53+00:00): Great work on your mapping. I found some unintentional errors like Highway duplicated nodes, Overlapping highways, and so on.
Keep contributing, Cheers!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151925133
nevw (2024-05-28 05:26:03+00:00): Hi, welcome to osm.
You have mapped the plot of land instead of the building. You are expected to accurately draw the outline of the house instead.
nevw (2024-05-28 09:28:00+00:00): I see you have done as well as can be expected in mapping the house with limited imagery. I also added your new neighbors house
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-31 23:35:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152101664 where the changeset comment is: reverted road and place reclassifications by cm81447 that were made without explanation or discussion
Jaller (2024-05-28 05:22:10+00:00): The title was supposed to be "Adding and improving pedestrian paths in the neighbourhood of Dream Mall"
mcliquid (2024-05-28 08:45:00+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
jfb95 (2024-05-31 01:58:24+00:00): Thanks a lot for this information.
I will be attentive to avoid conflits in the future.
Regards
kapazao (2024-06-04 06:04:39+00:00): Hola, por favor comenta correctamente los conjuntos de cambios, explicando resumidamente lo que editas, ya que así otros usuarios no pueden saber lo que hiciste y no ayuda en nada.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
Un saludo
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 09:09:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution in these mapping. This poi mapping looks great and also adding at least two key and value. Keep Contributing, Cheers!!!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151926532
ika-chan! (2024-07-07 08:08:07+00:00): This changeset has fictional roads such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1287285407, and was reverted.
Kovoschiz (2024-05-28 07:39:28+00:00): 1. What should be used here is `addr:suburb=` 
2. Please stop reusing the same unrelated comment. It pollutes that project, this changeset, and your image.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-30 14:47:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/163272829/history - would surface=gravel work here well?

If yes, no action is needed - I changed it already.

If https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:surface%3Dgravel is not fitting please let me know.
mikko_tamura (2024-06-13 13:13:21+00:00): this should be tagged as a gate not a college
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151926986
Al-mahruf (2024-06-13 23:21:08+00:00): Alright, noted
Hugoren Martinako (2024-05-28 08:33:35+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151769222
eggie (2024-05-28 07:13:09+00:00): Dag Alphen,
De MP  met twee outers heb ik verwijderd en er weer gewoon een polygoon van gemaakt met natural=water  Volgens de BGT loopt het water gewoon door van de noordzijde naar het westen.. Wellicht door een duiker?
Je edits.. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151927385

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-28 07:27:18+00:00): 'k Denk dat de editor er automatisch een mp van maakt zodra je een vlak gaat splitsen.
MVG
eggie
Hugoren Martinako (2024-05-28 08:33:42+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151769222
TheB55 (2024-09-09 06:14:41+00:00): Correct want ik wandelde vanaf de andere kant (Beukenburglaan, waar geen bord te zien is) en werd door eigenaar erop gewezen dat dit privé terrein is. Echter zijn de "private" tags in OSM en (alle?) apps niet onmiddellijk te zien op de kaart... Dus ik vermoed dat dit wel vaker gaat gebeuren zo. Is er iets beters?
eggie (2024-09-09 06:34:50+00:00): Dag TheB en Jan,

Ik heb access=private ook op de hekken getagd en verder alle overbodige weggebruikers verwijderd.
access=private op het wegdeel van hek naar hek is voldoende. Je zult dan ook zien dat de rendering voor een groot deel wegvalt.
Even paar keer CTRL-F5 voor het effect.
MVG
eggie
TheB55 (2024-09-09 08:33:23+00:00): top, bedankt!
BR_pebble (2024-07-02 14:26:45+00:00): Hello aartipawar
Thank you for mapping!
I have added missing buildings -37.8325462, 144.9646079;
-37.8324851, 144.9645345;
-37.832547, 144.9646328;
-37.8334312, 144.9650301;
-37.8324853, 144.9658596;
-37.8333934, 144.9657396;
-37.8333965, 144.9657566;
-37.8334894, 144.9658019;
-37.8334983, 144.9657991;
-37.8334575, 144.966137;
-37.8333597, 144.9660936;
-37.833504, 144.9663685;
-37.8336171, 144.9665671;
-37.8336178, 144.9665466;
-37.8335872, 144.9666569;
-37.8335137, 144.9666465;
-37.8333012, 144.9664939;
-37.8332636, 144.9665676;
-37.8332406, 144.9665677;
-37.8330713, 144.9665681;
-37.8329292, 144.9664573;
-37.8329482, 144.9664269;
-37.8329328, 144.9663073;
-37.8329355, 144.9662995;
-37.8329171, 144.9662343;
-37.8327964, 144.9665674;
-37.8328142, 144.9665603;
-37.8327821, 144.966638;
-37.832989, 144.9659246;
-37.8329842, 144.9659333;
-37.8329678, 144.9659991;
-37.8329514, 144.9660601;
-37.8330362, 144.9661295;
-37.833073, 144.9661463;
-37.8331079, 144.9661635;
-37.8331454, 144.9661781;
-37.8331794, 144.966196;
-37.8332177, 144.9662125;
-37.8332602, 144.9662291;
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
YomanNH (2024-06-07 07:14:00+00:00): Cześć,

ciągi pieszo-rowerowe to highway=path, a nie highway=cycleway. Prawidłowy sposób mapowania jest opisany tu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w
bxl-forever (2024-05-28 07:57:39+00:00): Enlevez l'adresse du parc svp. Adresses uniquement sur les bâtiments.
bxl-forever (2024-05-28 09:37:37+00:00): School already on the map as an area, please do not recreate duplicate tags on its main building, as it would create unwanted data corruption (one object, one feature rule on OSM)
miluethi (2024-06-01 01:10:07+00:00): Hi Ichan,

I deleted all your buildings in this changeset. The shapes are much bigger than shown on the satellite imagery.
Please try to match exactly the satellite imagery.  Also square out building and don't copy paste the same building shape for completely different buildings.
miluethi (2024-06-06 15:08:22+00:00): Aljea,

Your building shapes are far bigger than the sat imagery. I'm going to delete them.

Please narrow the shape to the sat imagery. Also square our buildings by pressing the "Q" key.

Thanks.
mikimapbuilder (2024-05-28 08:30:18+00:00): Building was removed because it doesn't allign with satellite imagery and has strange address descriptions.
MxxCon (2024-05-31 03:39:36+00:00): Hello.
What is the source of these edits? The changes you are making do not match any of the available satellite imagery..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151929607