piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Minh Nguyen (2024-02-27 06:06:49+00:00): Sorry for the delayed response. I don’t think you’d be able to tell a curb from a painted line in 3DEP. Anyhow, you’re right, these are clearly just red painted lines, judging from Bing Streetside imagery. Fixed in changeset 147958271.
Warin61 (2023-10-19 02:15:08+00:00): The name on the road is "Macarthur Avenue" Note the capitalization should be the  same on the addr:street value so they are an exact match. I assume the road name is correct as that is what is displayed on most maps.
Hoylen Sue (2023-10-19 06:54:40+00:00): That is a good question. "MacArthur" is used too. For example, in Google maps, TransLink (South East Queensland's public transport authority) and Northshore Brisbane (the developer of the area). Unfortunately, the physical street signs and the Brisbane City Council's official CSV file can't clarify the issue: they use all caps. Traditionally, the person's surname has always been "MacArthur"—the question is does the street name follow tradition or did it deliberately make a change away from it? Strangely enough, this page <https://suburbmaps.com/products/1946-hamilton-aerial-photo-01> lists both spellings as two streets?
Warin61 (2023-10-19 08:28:23+00:00): The same problem with all caps exists on the DCS Base Map for NSW too. 
I am not local so cannot do anything that way. Street signs too mostly all caps so they too are usually of no help. 
The lower case entry dates from some 14 years ago. That is a long time for the capitalization to be corrected.  I leave it to you, but make any change to both the addresses and road name. If it is wrong I expect someone will pick it up from the displayed road name.
Hoylen Sue (2023-10-19 08:59:16+00:00): I'm planning to visit the (State) Museum of Lands, Mapping and Surveying in the near future. So I'll ask them if they know where we can find the correct version.

I suspect someone accidentally/deliberately started using the lowercase decades ago, and some people copied it while other people continued to use the capitalised version. So both are in wide use. But yes, I agree OSM itself should be self-consistent—even if others might be consistently using the other convention.

I had a quick manual look at the changes I made, but couldn't find where it says MacArthur—do you know what needs fixing? A search identified the bus stops as "MacArthur", but those features were imported from Translink's database (who follows the capital convention) so I don't think we should change them.
Warin61 (2023-10-20 07:42:37+00:00): I'm a JOSM user. I can search and download for anything with the tag name=Macarthur Avenue. Similarly I can search and download any addr:street=Macarthur. I don't know if Id has the same capablity?
UndueMarmot (2023-10-04 04:29:27+00:00): Note to self: No receipt given. Also seemingly the *only* business renting in this building..?
Glassman (2023-10-05 00:40:31+00:00): OSM doesn't contain school district boundaries because they are not on the ground verifiable. We do make exceptions for cities, counties, states, etc.

I plan to revert these edits. Let me know if you have concerns. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142125049
Jenninwa (2023-10-05 04:55:11+00:00): Hello, Glassman. I just saw your email and responded to you.
adreamy (2023-10-13 04:27:07+00:00): Tags should only represent properties.
Do not use tags for descriptions.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
cserpell (2023-10-05 01:12:15+00:00): Hola, sabes que estaba viendo que el sector de "granja aromática" es difícil de etiquetar, porque la entrada es un camino privado, pero se puede reservar para ir a ese lugar que tiene un cafe y todo, y ahí uno puede entrar, por eso lo había dejado como "customers"... Y lo que está arriba es efectivamente un dam, ya que es una pequeña laguna con un embalse, más que solo un puente.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142125612
jptolosa (2023-10-05 08:22:45+00:00): Hola, si sólo puedes entrar a la Granja Aromática con reserva creo que private es el más adecuado (similar a entrar a un condominio) y además por necesidad debe quedar como private todas las vías que se ramifican de una calle marcada como private. Eliminé un dam que estaba duplicado y ocupando el lugar del bridge=yes. Pero habría que ver si realmente es un puente o si es parte del dique como ocurre en Rapel.
cserpell (2023-10-06 01:04:35+00:00): Ya muchas gracias!
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-04 06:06:32+00:00): Будь ласка, при редагуванні не допускайте політичних заяв в OSM. Грем Фіцпатрік,
Робоча група з даних OSMF

Please keep the political statements out of OSM when editing. Graeme Fitzpatrick,
OSMF Data Working Group
mini-me (2023-10-04 16:55:26+00:00): Там же всегда кирпич висел. Что-то изменилось?
E1m_O (2023-10-05 05:43:17+00:00): Весит, но он распространяется на на встречное направление. Выше знак полоса для ОТ где согласно ПДД, разрешено движение велосипедистов.
mini-me (2023-10-05 12:30:30+00:00): https://base.garant.ru/1305770

Действие знаков не распространяется:
3.1 - 3.3, 3.18.1, 3.18.2, 3.19 и 3.34 - на маршрутные транспортные средства;

Т.е. если смотреть на знаки в сторону центра, то как бы можно, а если от центра, то под кирпич нельзя
E1m_O (2023-10-10 16:48:27+00:00): Да, легкая неразбериха. Направил запрос СПб ГКУ "ДОДД" по этому поводу.
E1m_O (2023-11-15 18:07:27+00:00): Получил ответ от СПб ГКУ "ДОДД", они согласны с противоречием после согласований с ГИБДД изменят знаки.
mini-me (2023-11-15 18:11:55+00:00): Запретят или разрешат? :)
E1m_O (2023-11-16 06:21:01+00:00): Разрешат. Уберут кирпич для велосипедов.
Hritik168 (2025-12-31 14:11:36+00:00): The gates are always open, and lead to residential roads. Should they be marked residential instead?
maraf24 (2023-10-05 15:05:15+00:00): Proszę zaznaczać budowę tam, gdzie faktycznie jest.
Droga nie jest w budowie na większości odcinka.
dcapillae (2023-10-04 06:20:00+00:00): No es una importación (error mío).
harahu (2023-10-04 09:13:58+00:00): It seems you want this dispute to proceed as an edit war, rather than through dispute resolution. I don't.

I'll be leading by example and refrain from further reversions of your deletion of my work. I will refrain until such time that the Norwegian OSM community, or the DWG has passed judgment on the matter.

I'll likely get around to presenting this matter on the community forum by the end of the day, since you seem unwilling to take that step, despite you being the one deleting content from the database.

I'll keep you up to date.
harahu (2023-10-04 13:14:49+00:00): Here's my request for community clarification on this issue. Feel free to contribute your take on this as well.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/request-for-assistance-from-the-norwegian-community-in-the-resolution-of-a-mapping-dispute/104524
arjunaraoc (2024-01-03 01:13:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Can you provide more info about Project Mitra?

Happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142128475
Glassman (2023-10-05 00:42:58+00:00): #TIP: instead of deleting a business node that contains an address, just removed the business tags. That makes it much easier to add a new business in the future.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142128940
arjunaraoc (2024-01-05 01:49:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

natual:wood may be more meaningful for forest like areas, the place you mapped is part of a residential layout with one or two trees.

Happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142129048
arjunaraoc (2024-01-03 01:14:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142129092
maciek-szn (2023-10-04 07:12:07+00:00): Na pewno nie są gotowe.
JulesGabrielVerne (2023-10-04 07:34:11+00:00): sam parkowałem tam 2 zeszłym tygodniu. A ścieżką rowerową też jechałem bez problemu
maciek-szn (2023-10-04 07:38:43+00:00): Obszar placu Witosa jest do przebudowy przez JW Construction, dewelopera, który wybudował Hanza Tower. Rozpoczęcie prac miało nastąpić we wrześniu, ale nie jestem pewien, czy już nastąpiło. ZUE zakończyło swoje prace, ale tylko do granic kontaktu.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-02 10:47:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086734266/history - ma ktoś zdjęcie tego parkingu?
DeKaN (2023-10-04 07:56:26+00:00): Пожалуйста не проставляйте building:levels на здания, которые содержат building:part:levels и тем более на незамкнутые линие
arjunaraoc (2023-12-12 13:51:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Issue fixed vide https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145038690
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142129597
arjunaraoc (2023-12-12 13:45:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia) Upload your changes in smaller areas.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142129821
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-02 10:47:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086734266/history - jesteś pewien że te parkingi nie są zbudowane?
ElliottPlack (2025-02-15 16:22:02+00:00): Hello,

This is Elliott from the Data Working Group. The recent change to this road is incorrect and needs to be reverted. Please roll it back.

The data you referenced is inaccurate. I worked directly with the local county government, and this road was officially changed in 2010 to simply Charles Street—without North—outside of Baltimore City. The designation N. Charles St. only applies within the city limits. At the county line, it becomes Charles Street.

A more reliable source for this information would have been state or local government data, rather than the U.S. Census, which is outdated for this purpose. In the future, please verify changes with authoritative local sources before making edits.

Let me know when this has been corrected.

Best,
Elliott
NastassiaKalesnikava (2025-02-17 18:02:06+00:00): Hello Elliott, thanks for your feedback, we relied on local driver's knowledge. Also, this information was confirmed through several open sources that I've indicated. However, such nuances that this name only works within the city and on the regional map should be different - I did not take into account, thanks for noticing, I will now roll back the edit. In future I'll do my best to take into account such cases. Thank you!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-04 07:40:25+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11237664030

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Misa_zumba (2023-10-04 12:47:14+00:00): Hi Lucas Marques,
in this changeset, you have created lots of unconnected nodes like:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11237719209/history
Can you please check and remove all unconnected/duplicates nodes?
Thanks,
Misa_zumba
harahu (2023-10-04 09:06:46+00:00): What is this if not a parking lot (albeit a private one)?
oarn (2023-10-04 10:16:22+00:00): Det er bare en åpen plass
harahu (2023-10-04 11:10:16+00:00): Er ikke dette biloppstillingsplass som beskrevet i reguleringsdokumentene for hyttefeltet, da?

Videre har en annen bruker som hevder å være eier av denne tomten alt uttrykt på melding til meg at dette er nettopp en biloppstillingsplass, og at den brukes til dette de facto.

Da er det en parkering i OSM-sammenheng.
oarn (2023-10-04 12:21:04+00:00): Den blir brukt til alt mulig, innimellom står det bil der, innimellom blir det spilt kubb der etc, etc.  Den er ikke inntegnet som biloppstillingsplass i reguleringsplan.
harahu (2023-10-04 17:44:44+00:00): Hei oarn,

Jeg flytter diskusjonen om denne parkeringsplassen til forumet. Se: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/request-for-assistance-from-the-norwegian-community-in-the-resolution-of-a-mapping-dispute/104524

Du kan poste der om du har lyst å fortsette den.
Luzandro (2024-11-05 17:29:32+00:00): see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146562918
Dodko (2023-10-06 08:16:47+00:00): značku building=house používajte iba pre dvojdomy, na samostatné rodinné domy je značka building=detached
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:building%3Ddetached
arjunaraoc (2023-12-12 13:42:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142131832
eggie (2023-10-04 08:45:58+00:00): Beste Jelle... Import van gebouwen en adessen kun je hier aanvragen in het draadje BAG importverzoeken. 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43

Doe je dat zelf?

MVG
eggie
JelleDJs (2023-10-06 06:27:38+00:00): Als ik zelf weet welke nummers daar horen, en ik dat zelf al gecheckt heb in de BAG, waarom zou ik dat zelf niet mogen kunnen toevoegen?
eggie (2023-10-06 07:04:50+00:00): Dag mag wel, maar bij de periodieke updates staan er straks dubbele adresnodes. Het is daarom verstandiger om gebouwen en adresnodes te laten importeren. 
De importplugin herkent je zelf gemaakte adresnodes niet.
Datzelfde geldt voor het zelf intekenen van gebouwen. 
Je krijgt twee gebouwen op elkaar. 
Vandaar mijn tip. 
Groet
eggie
wolfbert (2023-10-17 08:44:30+00:00): addr:street ist ganz sicher nicht "Haus", "Pavillion" o.ä. Das LK und der Bildungscampus haben die Adresse  Hausmeninger Straße 221, 3362 Mauer. Einzelne Einheiten können dazu z.B. addr:unit haben.
Wolfgang Brandl (2023-10-17 08:58:11+00:00): Servus. Ja, das weis ich, aber leider wird die Hausbezeichnung gewünscht im Hinblick auf die Landesaustellung.
Es gibt eine Software die in Entwicklung ist die diese Bezeichnung anzeigen soll.
Ich werde mit der Firma nochmal in Kontakt treten ob andere bezeichnungen möglich sind.
PS: Ich arbeite selbst im LK Mauer..
wolfbert (2023-10-17 09:05:42+00:00): Die Daten in osm sollten allgemein nutzbar sein, nicht für einen speziellen Anwendungszweck oder eine besondere Software. Allenfalls kann man das name-Tag nutzen, aber die Straße ist es nicht.
Wolfgang Brandl (2023-10-17 09:18:51+00:00): Der Eigenname bleibt! Adresse wird noch richtig gestellt, mit Adressen aus dem offiz. Pendlerrechner.
Wolfgang Brandl (2023-10-17 09:21:59+00:00): zur info: der Eigenname Haus 1 ist im Landesklinkum offiziell Haus 1. 

Die Adresse von Haus 1 ist offiziell: Hausmeninger Straße 221 Haus 1, 3362 Mauer bei Amstetten.
wolfbert (2023-10-17 14:04:19+00:00): Dann würde ich Haus x in addr:unit setzen. Übrigens ist der Pendlerrechner nicht unbedingt maßgeblich, es gilt das offizielle Adressregister des BEV (wenngleich die Verortung der Adressen im konkreten Fall sehr phantasievoll ist). Für eine Visualisierung siehe z.B. https://bev.kolmann.at/map/#18/48.09246/14.80529
Für die Verortung ist die Gemeinde zuständig.
Wolfgang Brandl (2023-10-19 13:25:54+00:00): Servus. 
Ich werde das mit unsere Koll. Führung und der Gemeinde besprechen..
wolfbert (2023-10-25 07:38:26+00:00): Du kannst das Thema gerne auch in der Community (https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/at/59) zur Diskussion stellen.
jvazquel_sitna-import (2023-10-04 08:34:42+00:00): source:date: 2023-10-04
source:url: https://datosabiertos.navarra.es/es/dataset/direcciones-postales-de-navarra
type: import
url: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Importación_de_datos_del_SITNA
eggie (2023-10-04 09:13:29+00:00): Dag Flame... Zou de straatnaam echt Rondje Asterd zijn?
Anders kand die naam er beter af. 
Wellicht weet jij meer?

MVG
eggie
Flame_ (2023-10-04 14:27:12+00:00): ik loop hier wel eens en zover ik weet heeft dit geen naam, behalve dat dit een  stukje is van een paaltjes route "rondje Asterd".
eggie (2023-10-04 15:13:11+00:00): Ahh.. oke... wandelroutes 'horen' eigenlijk als een routerelatie te worden gemapt.. dus niet als straatnaam.
Up to you om het aan te passen. Ik heb geen idee hoe dat rondje loopt.
Het inleggen van een route is nog wel te doen met editor iD. Het bewerken kan beter met editor iD.

Mapse..
eggie
Brummelwuff (2023-10-04 12:03:31+00:00): Moin, du hast hier auch die Oderstraße gelöscht. Wäre nett wenn du das wieder ruckgänig machst.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142132748
Matze216 (2023-10-04 14:56:45+00:00): Ist wieder drin. Danke für den Hinweis.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142149138
BeOCeKa (2023-10-04 08:30:11+00:00): http://friseur-murat.com/
aharvey (2025-03-04 00:37:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11237813778 is not a ford, the footpath runs above the drain. I'll fix this.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-16 09:01:21+00:00): Hi @Elhamn1992
If you are sure that this doctor no longer has an office here, registering it as disused is not correct. Because this is always included in the lease of an office. You can delete it completely or register it as an active office without the doctor's name. Also, cite the source in the description so that other editors don't make a mistake.
Thank you for your efforts to improve the map.
eggie (2023-10-04 09:27:17+00:00): Dag Máttias.

Een highway= footway heeft een G7 bord of is duidelijk bedoeld voor voetgangers.
Geen bord dan highway=path gebruiken.
acccess=permissive is algemeen.
Beter specifiek taggen
foot=permissive bicycle=permissive
Iets anders kan er toch niet komen.
MVG
eggie
Kompass1 (2023-10-05 19:42:58+00:00): What kind of sick joke is this supposed to be, interfering with a humanitarian program?
wongstar2009 (2023-10-06 14:07:47+00:00): wasnt me man, get a grip kid
CjMalone (2024-01-12 11:44:55+00:00): FYI addr:country should be a 2 letter country code ("GB")

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:country
ZenPhil (2024-01-12 14:43:09+00:00): Thanks - all fixed now
CjMalone (2024-01-12 14:44:56+00:00): Thank you
LockOnGuy (2023-10-04 17:07:08+00:00): Hello little_maper, Why did you split the way 315-23 into two? it's one way but with a block in the middle so it should not be split, it should be linked as one with a block node where the block is.    
What do you think?   
Regards.
little_maper (2023-10-08 07:25:02+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy;
Thank you for reaching out.
We split the way 315-23 and added barrier=wall to make the routable more easy in this area
in Changeset:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141806944
and the user 𒂼𒄄 added a block on the wall
in Changeset:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=142098517
and it was duplicate information so we replaced the barrier block on node with a line,
so I think it is the same idea one way with a block in the middle,
and if you know this location please let me know and I will fix it.
Regards
little_maper
watmildon (2025-02-24 06:23:30+00:00): Beautiful work!!

I added info so it will now render on the mascot map. https://github.com/watmildon/HighSchoolMascotMap
DaveF (2023-10-04 12:39:10+00:00): Hi
What evidence have you that this is a bridleway?
Katherine Moore (2023-10-04 18:23:03+00:00): It's signposted as one - it links Bath Soft Cheese to the Bristol to Bath path
DaveF (2023-10-05 10:34:34+00:00): What evidence do you have of that? Did you take a photo?

It's designated as a footpath on the latest BathNES data & the barriers were all kissing gates when I last walked it.
Katherine Moore (2023-10-05 10:54:17+00:00): Alas it's not the sort of thing I go around taking photos of. It's a permissive bridleway, which is why it may not be recorded as such. You can contact the farm at Bath Soft Cheese if you want clarification. They are not kissing gates but wide field gates.
DaveF (2023-10-05 12:26:38+00:00): If so, it would great if you could update the barriers.
DaveF (2023-10-05 12:41:23+00:00): If permissive, then you should use the permissive_bridleway tag:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:designation#Permissive_Paths
DaveF (2023-10-05 21:00:50+00:00): You've misread the sign. & misunderstood the situation. It's attached to an *open* gate. The footpath you claim to be a bridleway is behind it. It only has kissing gate access 

https://snipboard.io/QZFqRJ.jpg 

The actual permissive bridleway is this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44639014
Piagno (2024-08-19 18:32:03+00:00): Hey Nomimono
You added a second bus stop "Posta" with this change. Has it changed, where the bus stops, to your new entry?
nomimono (2024-08-25 18:14:52+00:00): Hey Piagno. Thank you for your comment. Acording to official maps, only the bus stop on the main road exists. I can't remember if its an old bus stop or only wrong located. The POI should be deleted.
Piagno (2024-08-26 08:10:49+00:00): thanks :)
Frans S (2023-10-16 14:03:48+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
Please use the correct tag for a path.
footway is to be used in dense urban areas as reserved for pedestrians.
Best regards
jmarchon (2023-10-07 01:30:26+00:00): Hello!
This appears to be a private residence. Are you sure there is a business here? I've removed it due to suspicion of SEO spam.
jmarchon
❤️‍🔥 (2024-01-24 12:25:01+00:00): Hi, you might want to take a look at these 7 site relations. They have conflicting information in the ref/name tag...

https://osm.org/relation/16422042 - 0161 or 0160 ?
https://osm.org/relation/16455322 - 1091 or 0224 ?
https://osm.org/relation/16478319 - 0298 or 0290 ?
https://osm.org/relation/16478432 - 0295 or 0294 ?
https://osm.org/relation/16492643 - 0906 or 0347 ?
https://osm.org/relation/16952716 - 1084 or 1083 ?
https://osm.org/relation/16551610 - 1830 or 1890 ?
Lockstar (2024-01-25 00:32:09+00:00): Checked and fixed - thanks
silversurfer83 (2023-10-04 10:42:29+00:00): Danke für's Aufpassen :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142136745
eggie (2023-10-04 10:33:51+00:00): Hi  EDR   No need adding addresses to buildings in the Netherlands. an addressnode is already present. 

Greetz,
eggie
Hungerburg (2023-10-05 09:10:42+00:00): Hallo oe4wwl, da mussten ein paar Gipfel dran glauben - das kann nicht Absicht sein?
oe4wwl (2023-10-05 12:35:40+00:00): Liebe Hungerburg,
nein, das war nicht beabsichtigt.
Am ersten Tag hab ich Wien und das Burgenland eingetragen. Dann hab ich schon einen guten Rhythmus gehabt und hab mir für den zweiten Tag ein kleines Paket mit 58 Gipfeln vorgenommen.
Ich hab auch Weggabelungen und Militärstellungen genommen, aber bei zwei, drei Gipfeln hat mir die Fantasie gefehlt, welcher Gipfel gemeint ist.
Wenn du als Tiroler mehr Ortskenntnis hast, schau sie dir bitte an!
Ich wollte sie mir irgendwann genauer anschauen,, bevor ich dem AAI schreibe, der ja bei datasota eingetragen ist.
73
Wolfgang WWL
Hungerburg (2023-10-05 18:33:11+00:00): Hallo Wolfgang, von 11 Gipfeln waren 5 oder 6 keine mehr, da hast du natural=peak entfernt. Jetzt sind sie es wieder. Hab auch ein wenig geschoben, nach Luftbild, DGM und Höhenlinien.
oe4wwl (2023-10-06 10:49:18+00:00): Danke. Hab noch einen nachgebessert, wo ich den Gipfel verloren habe. Ist mir ein Rätsel. Werde in Zukunft aufpassen.