piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-04-07 07:18:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13713154015 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Heating and Cooling Contractor"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-15 10:33:19+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181359726
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:58:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
jcr83 (2026-04-17 20:31:47+00:00): La relation 20419248 n'est pas de type multipolygon (elle ne contient même aucun polygone !).
Merci de corriger.
ivanbranco (2026-04-07 08:13:46+00:00): Hi Thomaso58, why did you change "Torino, Vittorio Emanuele" to "Torino; Vittorio Emanuele"? That's the same location, using ";" make it seem like those are two different values (that's the standard separator in OSM).

thanks and good mapping
Hugoren Martinako (2026-04-07 08:35:37+00:00): No es necesario tener este elemento duplicado si ya existe la vía. Por qué lo duplicas?
stasiu512 (2026-04-08 13:24:45+00:00): Cześć, jak byłem tu ostatnio to znaki strefy były na tym odcinku https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=54.388815%2C18.59605%3B54.388272%2C18.597284#map=19/54.388545/18.596664
https://imgur.com/a/wU7ushS

Pytanie co zrobić z tym odcinkiem? https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=54.388831%2C18.59601%3B54.38929%2C18.595262
theDM (2026-04-08 14:53:28+00:00): Cześć, ten drugi odcinek jest poza strefą zamieszkania?
stasiu512 (2026-04-08 17:09:40+00:00): dokładnie tak, jedyne obawy mam co do tego iż znak który wysłałem wyżej na zdjęciu od drugiej strony czyli dla wyjeżdżających ze strefy zamieszkania na ten drugi odcinek znajduje się po lewej stronie, a zgodnie z rozporządzeniem „Znak drogowy umieszczony po lewej stro-
nie jezdni lub pasów ruchu stanowi powtórzenie znaku umieszczonego po prawej stronie, chyba że przepisy szczególne
stanowią inaczej.” Tutaj znaku z drugiej strony nie ma, więc nie wiem czy nie lepiej zostawić całą długość w strefie zamieszkania.
theDM (2026-04-08 17:56:14+00:00): Znaki po lewej są często stawiane, więc można założyć, że jednak tam strefy nie ma?
stasiu512 (2026-04-08 18:03:59+00:00): Wjazdowy jest po prawej stronie, wyjazdowy po lewej. Te znaki na tym słupie co zrobiłem zdjęcie na 100% są, jednak nie rzuciły mi się w oczy te przy wjeździe na osiedle.
Metauro (2026-06-22 15:55:45+00:00): Hello beyond_myworld, Thank You for your contribution. I have fixed couple of validation errors related to intersecting building within your fixed tasks. Be aware of validation errors while future editing.
Happy Mapping!
rempshaener (2026-04-07 15:18:01+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Wenn die Feldhydranten nicht mehr vorhanden sind, ist das Löschen legitim.
Wegen des verbliebenen Hydranten: Handelt es sich eventuell nur um eine verrohrte Saugstelle? Und ist diese wirklich vorrangig für Zwecke der Feuerwehr errichtet?
Wenn das alles zutrifft, wäre das kein fire_hydrant:type=pillar, sondern =pipe. Falls du dir denn noch einmal anschauen möchtest: dann am besten auch direkt den Namen löschen.
Danke für deinen Beitrag.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
OliCoMV (2026-04-10 08:25:20+00:00): Hallo,
danke für die Rückmeldung und die Erläuterung. Ich habe den Hinweis angenommen und den besagten Hydranten mit der Eigenschaft =pipe versehen, da er nicht wie ein üblicher Überflurhydrant aussieht, sondern eher eine, wenn auch mit Anprallschutz und Betonfundament ausgestattete Wasserentnahmestelle ist, die ggf. auch für Feuerwehrzwecke verwendet werden kann. Gerne würde ich ja ein Bild einstellen, aber ich habe keinen online-Speicher auf den ich verlinken könnte. 
Viele Grüße
NeisBot (2026-04-07 08:03:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13713208855 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Pest control office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-15 10:33:23+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181359728
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-04-20 15:29:49+00:00): بارك الله فيك
Jordi MF (2026-04-11 19:54:05+00:00): Hola,

¿Por qué eliminaste la etiqueta "official_name"? "Maó" es el nombre oficial del municipio. Puedes consultarlo en la web del Ayuntamiento: https://www.ajmao.org

Puede que sea una etiqueta redundante porque es exactamente el mismo nombre que aparece en "name", pero no por ello es incorrecto.

Saludos!
ajmat (2026-04-28 07:27:40+00:00): Hi
Jordi MF
Thank you for reaching out and for the link to the City Council website.
I removed the tag to maintain consistency with the previous Data Working Group (DWG) action on changeset 180022619, where this specific tag was removed.
I understand it is technically the official name, but I am following the previous administrative cleanup to avoid redundancy and ensure the data aligns with the recent DWG revert.
I appreciate your feedback and will continue to keep quality and community standards in mind for my future edits.
Ltrlg (2026-04-07 17:41:39+00:00): Pourquoi retirer footway=sidewalk ? Ça reste un trottoir.
Vicolapatat (2026-04-07 20:48:32+00:00): Bonjour, c’est une voie cyclable qui a été créé fin 2025. 
Pour les trottoirs, les vélos ne sont pas tolérés à part les enfants. Et le rendu est différent sur les applis vélo, qui ne font pas emprunter les trottoirs. 
Je peux changer pour voie cyclable et piéton sinon.
Ltrlg (2026-04-17 11:20:07+00:00): Ce n’est pas parce que footway=sidewalk se traduit communément en « trottoir » que ça implique que c’est invalide pour des chose qui ne sont pas _légalement_ des trottoirs. L’état du wiki est un peu incohérent, mais la version anglaise où ça peut complémenter n’importe quel chemin sur le côté de la chaussée me semble plus dans l’esprit d’OSM. Les éventuelles restrictions d’accès (ou accès supplémentaires autorisés) sont parfaitement modélisés en plus par la hiérarchie access=* et, en l’occurrence à mon avis suffisamment par le changement de highway=footway vers highway=path.
NeisBot (2026-04-07 08:21:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13713228936 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Photography studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-15 10:33:28+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181359731
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
olo81 (2026-05-31 15:15:34+00:00): nazwa opisowa 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919095696
NeisBot (2026-04-07 08:46:27+00:00): 🌍 Добро пожаловать в OSM, mli495979.
Спасибо за вклад!

Чтобы сделать сотрудничество проще и помочь другим понять ваши правки, лучше добавить краткое описание сделанных изменений. Ясные комментарии помогают сообществу следить за вашей работой и предоставлять более лучшие отзывы. Вы можете найти советы по написанию хороших комментариев здесь[1].

✅ Вот пример комментария на основе ваших правок карты: "Обновлены названия больниц: To'rtko'l tibbiyot birlashmasi, To'rtku'l rayoni orayliq bolnica"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, mli495979.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Updated hospital names: To'rtko'l tibbiyot birlashmasi, To'rtku'l rayoni orayliq bolnica"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
eggie (2026-04-07 09:08:06+00:00): Dag Vivien,

Gebruik deze tool voor de openingstijden. De format klopt niet. het luistert nauw.

openingsuren-tool

http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-07 09:08:40+00:00): Aangepast
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-01 23:00:55+00:00): Reverted addition of SEO spam name=* tag to wall and landuse area

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183521799
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-07 12:41:08+00:00): Hola jonasbraun, willkommen bei OSM.

Auch wenn vermutlich einigen oder zumindest manchen Urlaubern diese Straßen ein Begriff sind, bin ich mir gerade nicht sicher, ob die deutschen Namen auch im name=* Tag so eingetragen werden sollten. 

Sind die Namen auf den Straßenschildern Vorort zu finden oder wurde dies jetzt nur wegen der genannten Suchfunktion so eingetragen?

Adios!
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-08 05:55:31+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181013301
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-08 05:55:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20111
eggie (2026-04-07 09:13:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Volgens mij hoort de naam op de relatie te staan en niet op de spoorlijn zelf.
Voor vragen kun je terecht op het forum van OSM. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-07 09:15:59+00:00): De naam Vechtdallijnen staat al op de relatie als network
eggie (2026-04-07 09:40:41+00:00): reverted by changeset #180987996
eggie (2026-04-07 09:53:22+00:00): Vanuit de Britse community heb je ook al vragen.
Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-04-07 09:19:43+00:00): Bram,
Volgens mij is het niet correct wat je doet.
Je kunt het evt laten checken door de OV mappers. Zie forum.
Bv in dit draadje https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/algemeen-openbaar-vervoer-nl-topic/7050/285


MVG
eggie
A67-A67 (2026-04-07 09:33:24+00:00): Vechtdallijnen is niet de naam van deze individuele spoorlijn, maar de naam van de concessie. Deze concessie staat al in Openstreetmap.
eggie (2026-04-07 09:39:35+00:00): reverted by changeset #180987936
enzo_immergis (2026-05-27 20:57:20+00:00): Bonjour Pierre,
Même retour que sur le changeset suivant : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181102794#map=15/43.12478/6.01819&layers=C

Est-il possible de faire machine arrière et de repasser les chemins en 'highway=path' ?
Merci

Quelques chemins :
way/354333936
[...]
way/953019223
rempshaener (2026-04-08 07:50:18+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe zwei Anmerkungen:
- Derart kurze Sperrungen sollten nicht aufgenommen werden. Zwar ist durch die Datumsangabe die sonst geltende „mindestens 3-6 Monate“-Regel unkritisch, es ist dennoch unwahrscheinlich, dass die Angabe durch Datennutzer überhaupt registriert wird.
- Die Syntax wäre richtig
no @ (2026 Apr 7-2026 Apr 10)

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
Hufkratzer (2026-04-10 20:02:57+00:00): Hi,

We already had a short conversation 3 months ago: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176422929

A few days ago, you mapped several areas as horse riding centers that do not look like horse riding centers, but like horse riding arenas or round pens:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1497233589
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1497233597
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1497250132
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1497297878
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1497297879
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1497297880
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1497297881
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1497304923
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1497578817

Please make sure you use the correct preset for riding arenas; example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374632575#map=18/34.271117/-118.370940&layers=P  Thanks.
Hans Thompson (2026-04-08 02:06:42+00:00): How is this a private road. There is constant public traffic on it. Maybe it is just privately owned by Providence?
michael60634 (2026-04-08 02:28:37+00:00): There is public traffic on Wellness Street, but there are signs at either end of it that say "Private Road" under the street name. I'm not sure how I'd attach a picture of the sign, but I can take a picture next time I am in the area. As for ownership, I'll check the MOA website later, but it is most likely just owned by Providence but accessible to everyone.
michael60634 (2026-04-09 09:50:32+00:00): Here is a picture of the street sign:

https://drive.proton.me/urls/J6D5AEYZ9R#VMDJ1gbk1lee
michael60634 (2026-04-09 09:51:41+00:00): Also, after reading through the documentation more thoroughly, I've changed the road to permissive instead of private as that more accurately reflects the road's accessibility.
NeisBot (2026-04-07 09:30:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13713340159 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Financial advisor office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-15 10:33:30+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181359735
(Delete spam tags. First version)
eggie (2026-04-07 10:43:31+00:00): Dag Robbert,

Eigenlijk bestaan die dubbele nummers niet in het Kadaster. ze zijn dus niet officieel.
Meestal kies ik het laagste nummer.
Ik zie nu 2x hetzelfde bedrijf. Klopt dat nog wel? 

MVG
eggie
Robbert Wethmar (2026-04-07 11:21:02+00:00): heb zelf ook fysio baarsjes surinameplein op laagste nr (40) gezet. das prima dan.
weet niet welke je dubbel bedoeld? Fysiotherapie de baarsjes heeft 3 vestigingen. Misschien dat bij elk nog een brand:website zou kunnen /moeten (die vond ik even niet), maar verder geeft dit denk ik de situatie goed weer.
eggie (2026-04-07 11:27:32+00:00): Met dubbel bedoel ik dit nr 40-46, 
Die dubbele adressen bestaan in werkelijkheid niet in het Kadaster. Wel volgens de bedrijven zelf.
Voor de vindbaarheid is de originele adresnode het beste. 
MVG
eggie
Robbert Wethmar (2026-04-07 11:33:24+00:00): dat begrijp ik, en eens, maar fysiotherapie baarsjes staat toch op de adresnode van 40? of kijk ik scheef? Moet / zal ik nog iets verbeteren? ifso: wat dan?
Robbert Wethmar (2026-04-07 11:35:14+00:00): oh zie verwarring: je schrijft ik zie nu 2x hetzelfde bedrijf, ddie bedoelde ik  met mijn opm 'weet niet welke je dubbel bedoeld?' ;-)
eggie (2026-04-07 11:51:30+00:00): De rendering op de standaardkaart is een dingetje. Het is een keuze van de kaartenmaker of iets rendert. healtcare doet dat helaas niet.
Ik voeg wel eens office=therapist toe.
'https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dtherapist
Dan rendert het wel.
Die kaartlayers hebben eigenlijk niets met OSM te maken.
OSM is een database en geen kaart kort door de bocht.
Dus office=therapist bijtaggen. 

Mapse,
eggie
Robbert Wethmar (2026-04-07 12:08:52+00:00): ok, toegevoegd. thanks.
arcanma (2026-04-08 09:41:58+00:00): Salve, ho dettagliato meglio la struttura, l'area etichettata come edificio va usata solo per gli edifici, l'agriturismo comprende strutture diverse, i parcheggi, la piscina ecc., inoltre era solo indicato come ristorante
eggie (2026-04-07 10:51:28+00:00): Hoi,

Denk alleen dat je  wellicht als specificatie theme=....  ?  moet gebruiken.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:theme
Zag dat die museum specificatie er al in stond.
Maar het heeft al meer gewisseld van functie..
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161216993

Het is zelfs al een gebouw geweest. 
Eens kijken of die rendering terug komt. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-07 10:53:03+00:00): Yep  Op dit niveau https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/52.01200/5.90738

CTRL- F5 voor versneld effect.
george1201 (2026-04-07 22:17:52+00:00): Sind die Gebäude tatsächlich so vor Ort mit diesen Namen ausgeschildert? Heißt das eine Gebäude "Jugendclub", oder ist es der Jugendclub? Siehe Wiki, Abschnitt "name ist nur der Name" auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-07 12:43:08+00:00): Hi ruliomanba, welcome to OSM.

Do we have some duplicate geometries here? Please see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1497301053
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1497301054

Best regards
NieWnen (2026-04-07 20:39:05+00:00): Poprawiłem tagowanie na bardziej pasujące. Klucz highway niespecjalnie pasuje do budynku, choć idealnej wartości building tutaj nie ma :P

Możnaby się pokusić o bardziej nietypową wartość dla building.
Comino (2026-04-07 11:42:43+00:00): De openingstijden zijn niet conform de website van de bakkerij.
https://debakkerieje-groede.nl/over-ons
soliMM (2026-04-12 07:38:47+00:00): Reverted in changeset: 181217033

Based on latest Mapillary images, only small section of the road is one way, while rest of it is bidirectional.
BeartoothMountains (2026-04-14 09:49:23+00:00): Hi soliMM,
Thank you for reaching out, I agree and will defer to your edits.
melbournefan (2026-04-07 10:58:42+00:00): Hi, I don't recall any proposals mentioning a third track through Yarraville, there however is provision for a third track at the Francis St bridge however that dosen't need to be tagged
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180990005
NeisBot (2026-04-07 10:30:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13713421234 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Aesthetics clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-15 10:33:35+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181359743
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-04-07 10:30:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 14 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/289932797 v4 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/289932867 v3 | 6 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180990278
eggie (2026-04-07 10:36:59+00:00): Restored damage
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-07 11:53:32+00:00): Thanks @eggie

Fixed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180990531
iandees (2026-04-07 13:24:34+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2934679094 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180999008, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
rajdhani (2026-04-08 07:42:32+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181034305
cbeddow (2026-04-07 14:00:27+00:00): Nice work! I was just coming in today to fix this entrance area's paths and small missing building after visiting the Tierpark yesterday
habi (2026-04-07 15:31:21+00:00): I was also there yesterday, we should have had a meetup ;)
NeisBot (2026-04-07 10:56:17+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, Alicia Lagane.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added buildings"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 14:23:55+00:00): Fixed non-existent shop=solar_store tag to closest extant alternative, shop=electrical (even shop=solar would have at least made some logical sense, still very low usage but at least not zero and value makes much more sense as "store" is redundant with the shop=* key), in changeset 184434652

https://osm.org/changeset/184434652
osmviborg (2026-04-07 11:10:06+00:00): .. adjacent to the carriageway of a road "parking=street_side"
ballerup-kommune (2026-04-08 04:49:09+00:00): Okay - det virker også mere logisk efter at have læst den lange Wiki-dokumentation. Vi vil bruge dette tag fremadrettet i kommunen.
grzegorz75jan (2026-04-07 11:53:27+00:00): Rozumiem, że to edycja w celu dodania jednego obiektu. Jednak nie rozumiem dlaczego nazwa jest inna niż np. w KRS https://krs-pobierz.pl/acoli-spolka-z-ograniczona-odpowiedzialnoscia-i0001074931 już mniejsza o to czy sp. z.o.o. jest w skrócie czy nie. Tylko skąd ten Tarnów w nazwie i po co.

Nr. telefonu wprowadzony błędnie, godzinny otwarcia tzn. dni błędne bo po polsku. Adres osiedle Zielone "O"
Znacznik website służy do podania strony macierzystej a nie jakieś share bo jeżeli share to stosuje się znacznik url. Nie wystarczyło do website dodać po prostu https://acoli.pl/ ??

Jaki sens ma w description pisanie "Biuro rachunkowe w Tarnowie." przeciez na mapie jest to w Tarnowie.
Proszę doczytać na temat godzin otwarcia, telefonu i poprawić błędy.
micheleOSM3 (2026-04-14 05:41:12+00:00): Ciao, ho dei dubbi sul nome di questo tratto stradale (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1169125193). "Frazione" mi sembra più una descrizione del luogo che il nome della via. Corrisponde a quanto riportato su cartelli o altro?
Piene (2026-04-14 19:46:57+00:00): Hi!
Sorry, I don´t understand italian. On the buildings is a plate with a unique number for every entrance and under the number is written "Frazione A". In Germany this is usually the name of the street. If this not the case in Italy, please revert my change and sorry for the additional work for you.

BR
Piene