piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2025-09-26 10:41:25+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
Please square each rectangular building.
Map gray/brownish objects, showing a shadow, as well.
Best regards
Baloo Uriza (2025-09-26 13:55:20+00:00): This might need some adjustment since the location seems to be in the verge between the parking and the sidewalk.  I would hazard to guess this point was meant to go in a building, I'm just not sure where to be able to fix it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172442129
kurtoid (2025-09-25 14:00:40+00:00): whoops - left the review checkbox checked. sorry about that
descubrebitcoin (2025-09-25 15:02:20+00:00): Hello,
The wiki page says that indoor=atm tag is only for areas, not for nodes/points.
I used indoor=yes because that's what the iD editor suggests.
Tourism_info (2025-09-27 01:51:43+00:00): I think at the time it was right, but the ID admins sometimes also do strange things which don't fit https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-May/036119.html
Metzor (2025-09-30 21:19:23+00:00): Hi Tourism_info,

Here, indoor=yes means a feature is inside.
This us not related to indoor tagging scheme, that tries to described rooms and corridors etc.

Or (just kidding) do you want to retag all defibrillators with indoor=yes to indoor=defibrillator?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Ddefibrillator

In this context, indoor=yes is a synonym to location=indoor
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:location%3Dindoor

I hopefully this helps to get the subtle difference the indoor tag can be used for.

Best regards
Metzor
julcnx (2025-09-26 02:09:15+00:00): Thanks a lot for your contributions! Just a friendly tip: try to keep your changes smaller, like focusing on one country at a time. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Prasanna Msamy (2025-10-15 16:43:26+00:00): Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. 
Thank you.
eggie (2025-09-25 14:46:41+00:00): Hoi..

Nu is het identiek aan de BAG.
Volgens mij kun je het beter consistent maken met de tagging van de straatnaam.


Dus name=.... voluit geschreven..
... official_name= ..  zoals de BAG in zijn data heeft.

Je zou eens een balletje kunnen opgooien op het forum.
Mvg..
eggie
Groetjes (2025-09-25 14:58:49+00:00): Voor de straatnaam heb ik het zo gelaten als je noemt, dus name='voluit geschreven' en official_name='zoals de BAG in zijn data heeft'.

Ik heb met deze wijziging de tag addr:street van de adresnodes identiek gemaakt aan official_name, zoals beschreven in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Straatnamen_in_Nederland.
eggie (2025-09-25 15:41:54+00:00): Ik heb er wel vrede mee  :)
Jordi MF (2025-09-26 13:57:11+00:00): Se revertixen canvis de noms que no respecten la zona de predomini lingüístic del municipi d'Alacant. Els centres educatius de la zona de predomini valencià s'han d'escriure en valencià. Els de la zona de predomini castellà, en castellà.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172487409
Marek-M (2025-09-26 11:11:37+00:00): Cześć, w nazwach nie używamy wielkich liter (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy#Wielkie_litery). Nazwy, które edytowałeś lub dodawałeś wyglądają raczej na opisy budynków i do tego jest specjalny tag `description` (opis). Numery budynków (S20, M10, M7, i.t.p.) powinny trafić do tagu `ref` a nazwa firmy opisująca właściciela powinny trafiać do tagu `operator`. Dasz radę sam poprawić te dane?
tax144 (2025-09-29 07:16:21+00:00): poprawiłem, mam nadzieję że jest ok.
Strubbl (2025-09-25 14:35:02+00:00): Gut, dass du das entdeckt und repariert hast. Danke dir.
rarad74 (2025-09-26 08:09:01+00:00): Salut. Pentru drumurile de acces in parcari se foloseste service road cu cu subcategoria parking aisle, nu rezidential road. Rezidential road ramane ca atare doar cand se adauga parcari pe langa  o strada pe care exista trafic.
Am corectat eu. O zi buna.
CONTAN (2025-09-26 12:25:41+00:00): Bine mulțumesc
Alexmol (2026-01-02 22:54:32+00:00): Olá.
Neste changeset alteraste as tomadas dos postos de carregamento do Continente, ficou tudo misturado e com referências erradas.

Estava certo antes.
Alexmol (2026-01-02 23:03:39+00:00): Já corrigi, se achares que está mal podemos discutir e chegar a acordo.
ViriatoLusitano (2026-01-02 23:48:27+00:00): Obrigado pela correção. Amanhã passo por lá para confirmar.
Alexmol (2026-01-03 01:05:34+00:00): Obrigado, alguma dúvida contacta-me.
ViriatoLusitano (2026-01-03 13:31:53+00:00): Tudo certo, obrigado novamente. https://imgur.com/a/S3fARmV
literan (2025-09-25 20:11:12+00:00): на https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%84%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_(%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%9C%D0%A6%D0%9A) поезда останавливаются, а этот остановочный пункт относится к станции Серебряный бор
zorglubu (2025-12-07 15:25:34+00:00): Bonjour, le chemin est un contour extérieur appartenant à une relation landuse=farmland, il n'a pas besoin de porter cet attribut.
Bien cordialement.
Hung Tran 9x0 (2025-10-20 15:56:54+00:00): Bạn này có phải làm bên streetview.vn hay sử dụng dữ liệu của họ không ạ? Tôi thấy bạn có thêm đường không đúng với thực tế trong ngõ 459 bạch mai và có vẻ như bạn đang dựa trên ảnh của streetview.vn. Mong bạn sẽ kiểm tra kỹ lưỡng trước khi thêm hay nối đường ạ vì khi bạn nối sai thì tài xế công nghệ chúng tôi cũng bị tính sai đường đi.
Hung159 (2025-10-20 16:17:39+00:00): Mình không làm bên đó b à với cả mình chỉ đổi tên sao cho giống với bảng tên ngõ, ngách thôi b
Hung Tran 9x0 (2025-10-21 05:45:07+00:00): Xin lỗi bạn nhé. Tôi chưa xem kỹ phần lịch sử chỉnh sửa.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-12 10:24:38+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184009976

https://osm.org/changeset/184009976
wlcx (2025-09-25 15:49:53+00:00): Bad changeset title - this is adding a new info board
Comino (2025-09-25 19:25:45+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
vondyam (2025-09-25 23:54:02+00:00): ok :)
ricardoRodrigo (2025-09-25 15:08:47+00:00): correto
user_5359 (2025-09-26 07:13:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/11612515992 more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position
Alisbudhouse (2026-06-21 14:42:22+00:00): Nie wiem kto za to jest odpowiedzialny ale są to wszystko wyimaginowane kreski na oko i na odpierdziel. Lepiej by było to usunąć szczerze mówiąc
tomzyl (2026-06-22 09:39:10+00:00): Wyimaginowane kreski, które sa 1:1 z projektu? No ciekawe, bardzo ciekawe. A przetarg jak trwał, tak trwa.
YacoobPL (2026-06-22 10:18:34+00:00): Cześć, wrysowywałem projekt z dokumentów przetargowych więc powinny być okej, natomiast pamiętam że miałem bardzo ograniczone obiekty do georeferencji - być może coś się posypało. Zweryfikuję i dam znać, dzięki za cynk!
eggie (2025-09-25 16:30:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
citrula (2025-09-25 20:03:40+00:00): these look more like highway=footway than highway=service. They aren't wide enough for a car
rboda (2025-10-09 05:54:07+00:00): Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you.
rskedgell (2025-09-25 20:42:18+00:00): You accidentally dragged the north side of the roundabout across Trafalgar House. It's quite easy to do this without realising in web-based editors like iD and Rapid. However, the editor would have warned you about highways crossing buildings and other highways before you saved your edit.

Hopefully fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172457979
caitnahc (2025-10-20 23:51:39+00:00): Fixed in a later changeset. Apologies for the late response!
rskedgell (2025-10-21 07:57:22+00:00): No problem, thanks.
eggie (2025-09-25 15:51:15+00:00): Dag Groetjes.  Hier heb ik de adresnode verwijderd.
Ook zo'n consensus. :)
De kinderopvang staat nu getagd op de adresnode 13A.
Rendering gaat traag vandaag. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-25 17:32:52+00:00): typo   De adresinfo verwijderd (van de gebouwomtrek)
Константин Гам (2025-10-02 14:55:42+00:00): Добрый день! А зачем вы восстанавливаете НЕ актуальные данные?
Спутник посмотрите, на место прогуляйтесь, конфигурации дорожек изменены радикально, совпадений нет.
Dinamik (2025-10-02 15:52:03+00:00): Восстанавливаются данные, соответствующие текущему состоянию на местности. 

Подскажите, пожалуйста, какие спутниковые снимки Вы рекомендуете использовать? Общедоступные известные устарели. 

Данные и так вносятся по результатам натурных наблюдений. 

Уточните, пожалуйста, о совпадении чего с чем идëт речь. Трассы некоторых старых дорожек при реконструкции были сохранены, некоторые дорожки были убраны, некоторые новые дорожки были добавлены.
Константин Гам (2025-10-03 09:22:01+00:00): Трассы некоторых это 20%, а остальное совсем не такое.

Ещё хочу спросить, зачем вы внесли дорожки без тегов access, меня навигатор повёл через сквер, но доступ туда закрыт!

Исправлю, когда сквер откроют и будут треки, не проблема, просто не ломайте маршрутизацию хотя бы, опять.
Dinamik (2025-10-03 15:45:21+00:00): Если у 20% дорожек ничего не менялось, они обозначены и обозначены правильно, зачем Вы удалили и их тоже? 

Я добавлял на закрытые дорожки парка access=no (пример: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413136445/history ), потом Вы всë удалили.

Сейчас тег access=no добавлен вновь. Полагаю, этого должно быть достаточно, чтобы Вас не вело транзитом через закрытый парк. 

Уточнение геометрии по трекам – хорошее дело. Но удалять что-то, потому что оно было нарисовано на основе менее точной привязки, не стоит.
rohieb (2025-09-28 17:16:18+00:00): Moin, ist das auch über mich der Fall, jetzt wo das Kraftwerk keine Kohle mehr verfeuert? Wie schön in letzten Changeset auf dem Gleis von mir erwähnt, habe ich auch im letzten Winter keinen einzigen Zug hier gesehen, obwohl ich hier oft vorbeigekommen bin.
rohieb (2025-10-04 18:23:17+00:00): Siehe weitere Diskussion in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ab-wann-ist-eine-bahnstrecke-railway-disused-statt-railway-rail/136233
rohieb (2025-10-12 14:07:58+00:00): Ergebnis der Diskussion im Forum: 
* BS Energy will sich den Gleisanschluss als mögliche Option für zukünftige Lieferungen von Brennmaterial zum HKW offenhalten.
* Wenn es Hinweise gibt, dass da zumindest einmal jährlich ein Zug fährt, könnte man das zumindest bis zum Ende der Vegetationsperiode 2026 auf raiway=rail belassen. Sollte das Zuwachsen dann weiter fortgeschritten sein und diesem kein Einhalt geboten werden, kann man die Gleise auf disused herunterstufen.
Aleksandr02 (2025-09-29 04:44:22+00:00): https://yandex.ru/maps/57/khanty-mansiysk/?ll=69.025624%2C61.001003&mode=whatshere&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=248.943596%2C-0.781166&panorama%5Bfull%5D=true&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=69.026345%2C61.001591&panorama%5Bspan%5D=72.094524%2C29.265581&whatshere%5Bpoint%5D=69.025951%2C61.001531&whatshere%5Bzoom%5D=16.95&z=16.95
Stalker61 (2025-09-29 06:11:07+00:00): Плохо, когда человек не знает. Еще хуже, когда не понимает, что он делает.
Маршрутизация на данном участке с учетом действия дорожных знаков уже давно реализована посредством физического разделения встречных потоков на два вея, тегов oneway и turn:lanes:forward (направление движения по полосам). OSRM вам в помощь.
Не надо лепить избыточные рестрикшены и устраивать конфликты при конвертации данных.
Это OSM, а не НЯК. Ухудшение правильных данных является вандализмом. Поэтому и были сделаны 4 отката. Думал поумнеете. Не успокоитесь, будет и 10 и 20 откатов. И закончится все баном вашего аккаунта. DWG тоже надоедает тратить время на анализ ваших правок.
NeisBot (2025-09-25 15:51:34+00:00): Hi Ralph Schraven, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 98% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 75 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=172446460
Ralph Schraven (2025-09-25 15:55:37+00:00): Hi Neisbot. These changes were intentional. I have confirmed there are no buildings in the given spots I deleted.
citrula (2025-09-25 18:54:18+00:00): These don't really match up with the footpaths that are visible on imagery. If you switch to Bing imagery, it's much clearer.
rboda (2025-10-09 05:53:24+00:00): Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have reverted the edit . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you
citrula (2025-09-25 18:59:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions. It looks like you have made a few edits where you added a name like "new italian resteraunt" - on OSM, we generally try not to use descriptive names like that. It's totally fine for an object to not have a name, even if it's just because you don't know it yet.
tyr_asd (2025-09-25 16:42:14+00:00): you forgot to add tourism=hotel again. ;)
wildmaps (2025-09-25 16:52:39+00:00): Ups, Danke Martin ;)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-24 09:59:42+00:00): revert edit done without proper explanation, undo Rtfm (osm wiki) vel ti-lo (osm) vel TourismInfo (osm wiki) vel Tourism_info (osm) vel Gastronomy (osm wiki) pushing their weird undiscussed ideas

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175058952
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-24 09:59:05+00:00): revert edit done without proper explanation, undo Rtfm (osm wiki) vel ti-lo (osm) vel TourismInfo (osm wiki) vel Tourism_info (osm) vel Gastronomy (osm wiki) pushing their weird undiscussed ideas

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175058925
Robot8A (2025-09-25 16:17:28+00:00): #MappyHour #OSMEs #Notatón
Stephen Childs (2026-01-24 14:46:37+00:00): I was wondering about this change, but I see the Kitchener city web page even refers to Mount Trashmore. See: https://www.kitchener.ca/parks-and-trails/parks/mclennan-park/
rokas_osm (2025-09-25 16:32:43+00:00): The exact geometry for the ramp has to be created/corrected
zuicz (2025-09-26 09:01:17+00:00): Te nowe tory faktycznie odbijają na północ?
zuicz (2025-09-26 09:02:33+00:00): Dobra teraz widzę filmik, a to nie są po prostu te tory które były w budowie?
xboxik (2025-09-26 12:59:28+00:00): Tak, są 3-4 metry dalej na północ, nowy wiadukt nad Graniczną jest właśnie o tyle szerszy. Niestety brak nowych zdjęć satelitarnych na osm uniemożliwia zbyt precyzyjne postawienie torów., posiłkowałem się mapami Google, gdzie mają bardziej aktualne zdjęcia satelitarne. Obecnie cały ruch kolejowy jest skierowany na nowe tory i już zaczęło się rozbieranie starych.
xboxik (2025-09-26 13:09:17+00:00): Tammte nieczynne tory linii nr 1 są już rozebrane na odcinku od Zawodzia do wysokości ulicy Lubeckiego-Druckiego, tylko edytor pokazywał, że są tam ustawione przebiegi relacji, więc nie chcąc tego zepsuć, już tego nie robiłem.
Glassman (2025-09-27 01:45:00+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

The county does show the address with the street as Backstage aly, but the alley isn't named. How would anyone fine it?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172449132
Glassman (2025-09-27 02:02:17+00:00): In OSM features can be added if the can be verified, such as the service road to the water tower. If the road has no trespassing signs or a closed gate then it is appropriate to add access=private. Otherwise the way should be left.Someone has already added the service road back. I'll send you more info about OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172449260
Dimitar155 (2025-09-25 17:41:55+00:00): Мислех се си че е n3120016736, но явно не е бил. Благодаря!
MassCartog (2025-09-25 18:36:09+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. Some of the features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, On OSM, we do not removed features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Even decommissioned trails that still exist should not be removed. Removing them is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
bfree32 (2025-09-25 20:17:48+00:00): ok, thank you for the explanation.
martien-176 (2025-10-12 14:29:48+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping. 

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. 

However, you incorrectly tagged a few buildings with a layer=-1.

Layer is typically used when some things (like a bridge and a road) are on top of each other. The layer tag helps the map know which one is above or below the other in real life.

That is not the case here. Probably you were confused by the fact that your editor proposed to add a layer when buildings partly overlap each other.

Instead you should opt to reposition the buildings.

Please check out these sources for more info: 
- Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
- Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ 
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT global validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172449812
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-25 17:05:36+00:00): https://discord.com/channels/783754873861963786/783766269707026483/1420811326242029660
citrula (2025-09-26 18:53:32+00:00): What is "GOAT MAN"?
SomeoneElse (2025-09-25 23:27:36+00:00): Hello, please don't add things to OpenStreetMap that no longer exist (the English translation of the comment here includes " Lines for bridges and roadbeds that are no longer visible".
This has been mentioned before - see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=23230203 .
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2025-09-25 23:27:52+00:00): こんにちは。OpenStreetMapに存在しないものを追加しないでください（このコメントの英語訳には「表示されなくなった橋梁や路盤の線」が含まれています）。
これは以前にも言及されています。https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=23230203 をご覧ください。
よろしくお願いいたします。
Andy
ばみっと (2025-09-26 00:28:41+00:00): 前回は現認できない構造物も追加してしまいましたが、今回は現認できる構造物のみ追加しました。
元々登録されている構造物で現認できない構造物は元の編集者を尊重して削除せず、各構造物にコメントを残しています。
NeisBot (2025-09-25 17:55:34+00:00): Hi Abi Prewitt, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 65 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=172451809
Abi Prewitt (2025-09-25 18:54:22+00:00): Yes, they were intentional.
Deftax (2025-09-25 18:00:39+00:00): PS. Jakby ktoś się zastanawiał, dlaczego obszar jest tak duży, to przez zmiany na planowanej linii Tarnów - Busko Zdrój (na stacji Tarnów), która jest zrobiona w 1 kawałku.
NeisBot (2025-09-25 18:12:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-29 11:27:57+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/172608009
NeisReview (2025-09-29 11:28:40+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172469826
Buraddo (2025-09-27 18:08:07+00:00): Don't add fake informations!
user_5359 (2025-09-26 06:54:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the existing Starbucks cafe (https://www.osm.org/node/5837510554) ?
Please do not enter information twice.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-10-01 21:02:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 172724890 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18770
mcliquid (2025-09-27 18:35:13+00:00): Grüß dich, lässt du die Gebäude mit Life-Cycle-Prefix bitte noch drin solange das Luftbild sie noch zeigt? Danke dir!
Philipp Glogger (2025-09-28 08:17:43+00:00): Servus. Danke für den Hinweis, wieder was gelernt 🙂. Ich füge sie in dem Fall wieder hinzu.
Philipp Glogger (2025-09-28 08:19:22+00:00): Und grad erst gesehen, dass du das schon gemacht hast. Danke dir!
NeisBot (2025-09-25 19:07:08+00:00): Hallo ldj55, herzlich willkommen und vielen Dank für deine Mitarbeit!

Um die Zusammenarbeit zu erleichtern und anderen dabei zu helfen, deine Änderungen zu verstehen, ist es am besten, eine kurze Beschreibung der von dir vorgenommenen Änderungen hinzuzufügen. Klar formulierte Kommentare helfen der Gemeinschaft dabei, deiner Arbeit zu folgen und bessere Rückmeldungen zu geben. Du findest Tipps zum Schreiben guter Kommentare hier[1].

Basierend auf deinen Karteneditierungen in diesem Changeset habe ich einen Vorschlag dafür erstellt, wie ein Kommentar aussehen könnte: Entfernte fixme-Positionstags von einem Knoten
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi ldj55, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1]. .
Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: Removed fixme position tag from a node

---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
trigpoint (2025-11-22 18:35:00+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175000695
Gregory Peony (2025-10-12 22:04:42+00:00): Please read about how to use the layer tag here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer#Guidelines
zabop (2025-09-25 19:19:26+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comments. "І" on its own does not seem to be meaningful. If I'm missing something, please enlighten me.
eggie (2025-09-25 20:45:11+00:00): review_requested 	yes
Dag Jan,

Lijkt me oke zo.

Groet,
eggie
user_5359 (2025-09-26 06:48:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database.
Please only draw (not scribble) in existing objects and facts.
eggie (2025-09-25 20:43:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Opensource tester (2025-09-26 18:18:27+00:00): Hallo, Eggie. Ik heb her gelezen en je eerste opmerking over twee rijstroken trouwens ook. Het is soms best wel lastig om de juiste keuze te maken, terwijl het simpel lijkt. Dus check mijn items aub want dat geeft mij een beter gevoel met mappen. Gr. Rene.