piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eerib (2026-02-26 20:44:37+00:00): Hello ovaryaction

Thank you for your edit. Unfortunately it does not meet OpenStreetMap standards. Please refer to the following wiki page that focuses on deletions of trails but is applicable in this case.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

If you have further questions regarding the policies or outdoor mapping in general then I recommend starting a discussion thread on the OpenStreetMap Community Forum.

https://community.openstreetmap.org

If you would like to dispute this revert of your edit then you can reach out to the Data Working Group, the moderation group of OpenStreetMap by sending an email to the following email address.

data@openstreetmap.org

Thank you, eerib

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179103587
eerib (2026-02-26 20:44:38+00:00): Hello ovaryaction

Thank you for your edit. Unfortunately it does not meet OpenStreetMap standards. Please refer to the following wiki page that focuses on deletions of trails but is applicable in this case.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

If you have further questions regarding the policies or outdoor mapping in general then I recommend starting a discussion thread on the OpenStreetMap Community Forum.

https://community.openstreetmap.org

If you would like to dispute this revert of your edit then you can reach out to the Data Working Group, the moderation group of OpenStreetMap by sending an email to the following email address.

data@openstreetmap.org

Thank you, eerib

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179103587
XimeX (2026-02-27 12:42:28+00:00): Es ist schon ein McDonalds etwas südwestlich eingezeichnet. Hat sich die Position verschoben?
Luzandro (2026-02-28 15:11:35+00:00): nein, hat sich nichts geändert. Habe das Duplikat entfernt
Frans S (2026-02-27 16:07:44+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings
A: Inaccurate mapping. 

D: Connecting nodes to other features.

E: Buildings not squared or rounded.



Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179101551
mueschel (2026-02-28 11:35:15+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM.
bitte wirf einen Blick ins Wiki, wie Tiergehege üblicherweise getagged werden - oder vergleiche auch mit anderen Zoos.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dzoo

Generell müssen Dinge wie "Fläche" und "Umfang" nicht getaggt werden - das ergibt sich ganz einfach aus dem Objekt selbst.
NeisBot (2026-02-26 19:54:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1483526862 v1 | 10 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179101731
MappingMore (2026-02-27 12:05:24+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179128376
Frans S (2026-02-27 16:06:28+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings
A: Inaccurate mapping. 
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.



Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179101774
IvaKraljić (2026-02-27 20:45:32+00:00): The unnecessary source:hgv has since been deleted in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179149161. #OptimoRoute
Frans S (2026-02-27 16:04:22+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings
A: Inaccurate mapping. 

D: Connecting nodes to other features.

E: Buildings not squared or rounded.



Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179101955
Luzandro (2026-02-27 07:13:51+00:00): Hallo,

du hattest hier irgendwie den Kreuzungspunkt so verschoben, dass ein Teil der Lemböck- und Ketzergasse überlagert und auch mit der daneben verlaufenden Pipeline verbunden waren.

Die Verbindung mit dem separaten Gehsteig habe ich auf 2 Wege aufgeteilt und mit den Fußgängerübergängen verbunden, noch dazu, wo diese schon vorhanden waren.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179101958
AlbertCohen (2026-02-27 07:51:42+00:00): Oh oh, das tut mir sehr leid. War wohl ein Bedienungsfehler in josm. Muss ich den Datensatz revidieren, zurück rollen? Sorry for the hassle und danke für die Informationen. Sag mir bitte Bescheid, wenn ich noch etwas machen soll. 
Danke
Luzandro (2026-02-27 08:20:49+00:00): nein, es sollte wieder alles korrigiert sein
TheUKHighStreet (2026-02-26 19:59:32+00:00): Meant to link to the note.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4776532
Frans S (2026-02-27 15:59:46+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)

-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping. 
C: Collected adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.

E: Buildings not squared or rounded.
You mapped an object as a 'Brown field' Local knowledge?  To me it looks just as farmland.
This is a building map only, no other object needs to be mapped.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179102254
Frans S (2026-02-27 15:59:50+00:00): Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179102254
Frans S (2026-02-27 16:12:22+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and correctly mapped them. 
Please do not add a layer to a building to avoid errors.
 Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179102462
MJpi (2026-02-27 16:37:05+00:00): Hello, thank you very much for your comments. I have tried to check the square construction very carefully with the tool, checking thoroughly, but I will review the error. Thank you very much!
Enock4seth (2026-02-26 20:46:24+00:00): Hi, what are you trying to map here? Is this supposed to be a suburb or neighborhood?
Godfred_uew (2026-02-26 21:05:59+00:00): Suburb
Enock4seth (2026-02-27 17:39:30+00:00): Hi, Unfortunately that is not how you should be mapping them. Since the limit / extent of these neighborhoods are not clear, adding them as random areas (polygons) is not useful. 

Here is what to do, add a node (point) somewhere in the center of neighborhood, select Neighbourhood in ID editor, which adds the tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dneighbourhood

Please stop using ALL CAPS for names, use Title Case instead. Also change the names of features you have added from ALL CAPS to Title Case eg. Noyem Market instead of NOYEM MARKET.
NeisBot (2026-02-26 20:24:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13502713774 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Childrens clothing store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-07 05:33:02+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179473550
(No visible changes after review)
notmyproblem1 (2026-03-03 18:14:23+00:00): Ciao, come hai fatto a rilevare dove si trova la curva?

Grazie.
notmyproblem1 (2026-03-14 14:30:44+00:00): Mantieni la history dei segmenti.

Scopri di più:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
fedc (2026-03-14 20:07:43+00:00): Il tracciato è ovviamente approssimato, ho seguito le tue indicazioni nella correzione.
SomeoneElse (2026-03-21 13:34:23+00:00): Hello fedc,
It does look as if you have redrawn https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27316986/history as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1483538254 .  It would be better if you could keep the history.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2026-03-21 13:34:27+00:00): Ciao fedc,
Sembra proprio che tu abbia ridisegnato https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27316986/history come https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1483538254. Sarebbe meglio se potessi mantenere la cronologia.

Cordiali saluti,
Andy
mueschel (2026-02-27 18:01:32+00:00): Hi,
please check the fuel tags. It should be 'propane', not 'propame'.
NKA (2026-02-28 06:16:30+00:00): Thanks
BubbaJuice (2026-05-03 03:21:52+00:00): Hi Roads_AZ44>,

I'm reverting this changeset as you essentially just retraced this road, deleting important lane, maxspeed, and surface tags. I see you did fix how the road connects to La Canada, thank you. Keep mapping!

Thanks,
BubbaJuice
Roads_AZ44(2) (2026-05-06 00:11:03+00:00): Thanks for replying! Thanks for the useful insight, I do have a bit of mapping experience from another mapping software, hope that helps on here, and my edits are helpful!
Roads_AZ44(2) (2026-05-06 00:17:02+00:00): Also, please look near E Tangerine Rd and Water Harvest Way, I mapped a turn lane but im not sure if its correct, or how you map turn lanes
Roads_AZ44(2) (2026-05-06 00:44:59+00:00): And I also have some changed that need to be looked at at valencia
BubbaJuice (2026-05-06 02:21:01+00:00): To avoid remaking objects, look at the "Split" tool in any editor, where you can split an object into two segments which might make your mapping easier.

Also, the main reason why we don't retrace things is because of the OSM principle "Keep the History" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history.
stasiu512 (2026-02-26 21:10:00+00:00): Cześć, tagu service i name nie używamy w ten sposób. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:service?uselang=pl
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
b-holdet (2026-02-26 21:34:00+00:00): Jeg tror nu ikke at vejen hedder Slagtehusgade.
Se evt. kommentar her
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178951923
Linus W Frische (2026-02-26 21:37:16+00:00): Har rettet det tilbage for at undgå evt. licensbøvl fra google maps: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179105263
quincylvania (2026-03-17 02:34:37+00:00): Hi there, I saw your note on the Lower Peninsula relation. I'm not sure what the issue is, the Lower Peninsula is a distinct named geographic feature that people want to show on maps. There are dozens of natural=peninsula features of similar size in OSM. You can see an example rendering here: https://themap.is/parks#map=5.25/44.382/-86.191
Carlos404 (2026-02-26 21:01:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179104108#map=19/6.386093/2.313873
IvaKraljić (2026-02-27 20:51:11+00:00): The unnecessary source:hgv tag has since been deleted in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179149329#map=18/41.779063/-71.441876. #OptimoRoute
Carlos404 (2026-02-26 21:11:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179104448#map=19/6.392602/2.397575
NeisBot (2026-02-26 21:15:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/107124048 v3 | 7 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179104474
NeisReview (2026-03-07 05:33:26+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179190777
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-02-27 11:08:25+00:00): Merhaba. Eklemek istediğiniz öğeleri yanlış etiketlerle eklemişsiniz. shop=outpost etiketi teslimat noktaları için kullanılıyor. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=outpost

historic=monument etiketi de anıtlar için kullanılıyor. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmonument

Lütfen eklediğiniz hatalı etiketleri düzeltebilir misiniz?
Rainero (2026-03-12 16:49:05+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179766952
(unzulässige Quelle)
Carlos404 (2026-02-26 21:18:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179104680#map=19/6.418979/2.340073
NeisBot (2026-02-26 21:27:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 42 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/665906130 v1 | 18 crossings
https://osm.org/way/665906141 v1 | 13 crossings
https://osm.org/way/299469784 v11 | 11 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/6233814378 v2
https://osm.org/node/13463349799 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179104891
NeisReview (2026-03-07 05:33:26+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179117004
https://osm.org/changeset/179117122
Carlos404 (2026-02-26 21:26:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179104946#map=19/6.386093/2.313873
m_fuhrmann (2026-02-27 08:56:15+00:00): Hi Matze!

Wie genau gehst du an solche Änderungen ran?
Es gibt glaube ich diverse Portale wie zB.

https://www.geoportal.hessen.de/
oder
https://www.geoportal.de/Info/tk_08-alkis-hessen

wo man einiges an Informationen herbekommt und dann übertragen könnte.

Magst du vielleicht mal einen Abschnitt in das Fulda Wiki für solche Arbeiten eintragen? Das fehlt nämlich noch gänzlich.
Bisher haben wir ja super viele schöne Ideen, was man so für OSM tun könnte dort gelistet. Das Arbeiten mit offiziellen Quellen für Straßen, Gebäude, Grundstücke etc zu dokumentieren, wäre eine klare Verbesserung.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fulda

Viele Grüße!
matze089 (2026-02-27 11:14:05+00:00): Hi. 
Die Karten fürs Katasterverzeichnis sind ja auf OSM in den Ebenen abrufbar. Zur Kontrolle gehe ich dann noch auf die Ebene Hesse DOP20 (also Satelittenaufnahme). 
Grüße zurück.
b-holdet (2026-02-27 12:16:37+00:00): Havde det ikke været bedre at rulle changesættet helt tilbage?
Lige nu står vejen med Google som kilde via image=*
Frank Peng (2026-02-27 04:08:54+00:00): You could have just retagged the highway=path way that you deleted in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175124664/history) to highway=service + service=parking_aisle and modified its geometry, instead of deleting the highway=path way and mapping a new parking aisle in its place (what you just did here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1483593064). By just modifying and reusing the existing map elements such as roads, buildings, landuse, relations, etc., instead of deleting them and remapping them from scratch, it helps preserve the element history on OSM and follows the good practice of keeping the history on OSM.

Please refer to the OSM Wiki article on keeping the history on OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179105274
Frank Peng (2026-02-27 04:36:02+00:00): Also, please respond when other mappers and I comment on any of your changesets asking about your map edits. I left comments on a number of your changesets asking about your map edits, and you have not responded to them. It is crucial that you respond to comments made by other mappers in the changeset discussions of your changesets as it helps build trust. If you don't respond, then you may be treated as less trustworthy. So in the future, when other mappers and I comment in the changeset discussions of any of your changesets, pointing out issues or asking about your map edits, please respond to those comments or you could be blocked from editing OSM.

Please refer to the section titled "Someone commented on my changeset, what should I do?" in the OSM Wiki article on "Changeset": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Someone_commented_on_my_changeset,_what_should_I_do?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179105274
schoka (2026-02-27 15:08:56+00:00): Hallo "Passion Baumpflege" und Willkommen bei OSM. 
Deinen Eintrag habe ich mit dem Typ Gartne- u. Landschaftsgärtner (craft=gardener) erweitert und als Punkt (POI) gesetzt. Du kannst den POI gern noch mit Webseite, Telefon oder Öffnungszeiten versehen. Das kannst im Editor iD machen, oder über https://mapcomplete.org (Karte Geschäfte) oder andere Tools. Bei Fragen hilft dir die OSM-Community gern weiter.
Frans S (2026-02-27 15:45:47+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179105473
DressyPear4 (2026-04-01 22:20:43+00:00): Olá, não remova informações dos elementos do mapa
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179105511
HellMap (2026-02-26 21:56:11+00:00): I think the problem here is that someone can easily map this as parking again. Our current aerial is going to be the latest for probably years. This should be something like was:amenity=parking, so no one accidentally redraws it, which is a common problem with old aerials (and in this case even with fresh aerial, it's not obvious).
markalex- (2026-02-26 22:02:54+00:00): Good point. I assumed that anybody would check street level photos, but more I think about that, more I see how bad of an assumption this is.
I'll add was:amenity=parking shortly
HellMap (2026-02-26 22:11:14+00:00): Oh yeah, nobody checks street photos ;) I'm pretty sure most mappers are not even aware of it. You are more diligent than like 95% of mappers to check street imagery.

By the way, it's best to use the original element to preserve the history for these, i.e. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34176909/history . That way, anyone actually looking at what this was before can easily see the dates and changes and sources and stuff like that. Obviously, this is a tiny location no one cares about and there's not much confusion (and you even left a note), but as a general consideration.
markalex- (2026-02-26 22:16:24+00:00): Yeah, I understand that it's better to use original, but I didn't know it's possible to restore it after deletions (without reverting whole delete changeset).
Please show me the magic you used
HellMap (2026-02-26 22:22:14+00:00): JOSM, File -> Undelete object, w####.

(Alternatively, reverting all changeset, but only uploading specific selected elements also works if many are needed, which is basically a partial revert.)
markalex- (2026-02-26 22:26:35+00:00): Ohh, right, JOSM.
One day I'll overcome myself to start using it. But not today.
HellMap (2026-02-26 22:30:54+00:00): To be fair, I use iD for 99% of things and only some very specific complicated things on JOSM. It's just too cumbersome for normal editing. But you can do some cool specialized things.
markalex- (2026-02-26 22:42:52+00:00): That's exactly what I meant: iD is enough for what I usually do (and even more for what I understand how to do).
JOSM has quite a learning curve, so much so that on my first attempt I capitulated in just 15 minutes. So I'm not sure if learning how to use it worth it for me, at this time.
Also, with great power comes great responsibility, and all of that =) Not sure on that part too.
richlv (2026-02-27 22:21:03+00:00): I find it amazing that IT people can do programming but can also be defeated by JOSM =)
I found JOSM to be easier to use especially because I could more easily distinguish data types and elements, and have more direct control over them.
Well, Potlatch being in Flash and super-slow internet speed might have motivated me some more :)