piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
A67-A67 (2023-02-15 16:07:07+00:00): Hallo Leo,

Mijn excuses. Ik probeer altijd goed op te letten en de routes aan te passen aan de meer gedetailleerde intekening. 

Helaas glipt er wel eens wat doorheen. Bedankt voor het herstellen van mijn fouten.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-12 14:10:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380471937

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
moje_konto (2023-02-12 16:47:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/729748682
Tutaj już był duży obszar płatnego parkingu P6.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1144359446
W tej edycji dodano wewnątrz mniejszy parking z zaznaczonym brakiem opłaty.

Dlaczego ten fragment parkingu powinien być wyszczególniony i w jaki sposób jest bez opłaty? Jakieś źródło?

Na fotomapie ani na planie lotniska nie widzę zmiany parkingu P6.
NorthCrab (2023-02-13 00:49:20+00:00): Prawdopodobnie to tylko błąd świeżaka :D
moje_konto (2023-02-13 07:44:14+00:00): Raczej tak, więc jeśli nie będzie wyjaśnienia, to ten mały parking jest do usunięcia.
moje_konto (2023-02-28 20:34:48+00:00): www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133145341

Wycofałem ten parking.
aceman444 (2025-11-02 17:57:07+00:00): Dost zbytocne sekanie ciest https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1144362394 a vytvaranie trojuholnikov, kde ziadne fyzicke oddelenie pruhov neexistuje. Skoda potom tiez prace s tolkymi zbytocnymi relaciami zakazov odbocenia.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-12 14:30:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3468365154
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310647552
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310647553
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310647554
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310647556
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310647558
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304593107

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
b-holdet (2023-05-21 17:44:24+00:00): "crossing" på en kirkegård?
Mapimp84 (2024-03-25 20:55:18+00:00): Iran
eggie (2023-02-12 15:50:21+00:00): Beste Erik.. Probeer concreet aan te geven was je doet.
Bv bankje toegevoegd.

Mvg
eggie
abdul_4ts (2023-02-13 09:56:22+00:00): Hello Nana,
Thanks for contributing. Your changeset comment should tell what you have done on the map (ex. added football pitch). You can direct all other concerns to the note/fix-me field like you did.
abdul_4ts (2023-02-13 09:58:29+00:00): Also, great thing that you knew the imagery is not up-to-date. You can switch satellite imageries to pick the latest one. Happy mappy day.
Nana Nketiah (2023-02-13 11:50:25+00:00): Thank you Adbul
mappinglander (2023-02-12 18:25:02+00:00): I've noticed that you have accidentally imported boundary borders to the map. Please check the edits carefully while saving. I've manually removed them for this instance.
Hufkratzer (2023-02-12 21:31:15+00:00): Hi,
du hast
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1144374751
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1144375033
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1144375322
als Reitanlagen gemappt (Tag leisure=horse_riding). Aber das sind keine Reitanlagen, das sind Reitplätze, ich zitiere von
https://www.hochreiter-reining.com/ranch :
"Die Reitanlage South Hill Ranch bietet an Infrastruktur:
- Großer Reitplatz (35 x 100 m)
- Kleiner Reitplatz (22 x 40 m)
- Reithalle (20 x 40 m)
- Roundpen
- Führmaschine"
Für Reitplätze gibt's in iD ein Preset "Reitplatz";
siehe auch
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
eggie (2023-02-12 16:14:04+00:00): Dag Henri.. 
Je vraagt feedback. 
Lijkt me oke zo. Het hele veld is een speeltuin.

MVG
eggie
Henri Spijker (2023-02-13 08:58:08+00:00): top bedankt

gr Henri
eggie (2023-02-13 09:08:37+00:00): Henri.. Ik heb het net toch nog even aangepast, want er stond nu een vlak landuse=grass met leisure=playground samen op dezelfde polygoon.
Nu ligt de speeltuin apart van de landuse. De heg heb ik toegevoegd en wat bomen. Ook parkeerstrook toegevoegd.
Paar keer ctrl f5 voor het effect. 
MVG
eggie
Hans Bieshaar (2023-02-13 06:54:39+00:00): Het lijkt erop dat je de node nog steeds bij 'De Stoven' staat.
NHVELDH (2023-02-13 08:16:58+00:00): Beste Hans Bieshaar,

Je hebt volkomen gelijk. Ik had wel een nieuwe node gemaakt op het nieuwe adres van het bedrijf, maar had verzuimd de oude node te verwijderen. Dat heb ik nu gedaan, met de vermelding "op advies van een ervaren mapper"!

Met vriendelijke groeten,

Niels H. Veldhuijzen (NHVELDH)
eggie (2023-02-13 08:55:56+00:00): Op de Stoven heb ik de BAG adresnode nr 25 hersteld.
Eigenlijk nooit een adres aanpassen als een bedrijf verhuist.
Gewoon de bedrijfsinfo verwijderen en op de nieuwe locatie de info weer bijvoegen op de bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
NHVELDH (2023-02-13 10:46:34+00:00): Beste Hans Bieshaar,

Ik had de oude vestiging van Ruessink helemaal verwijderd. Eggie wijst mij erop dat ik niet de hele node had moeten verwijderen; hij heeft dat inmiddels hersteld. Het bedrijf is weg, maar het gebouw natuurlijk niet.
Jillis inactivE (2023-03-06 15:48:57+00:00): Hoi, op de nieuwe locatie is alleen de naam toegevoegd, niet wat er op het adres zit.
Ik zet er in ieder geval shop=car bij.
NHVELDH (2023-03-06 16:23:26+00:00): Goed zo. Hartelijk dank. NHVELDH
Frans S (2023-03-06 16:31:55+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please don't connect nodes of buildings to each other.
Best regards
Frans S (2023-03-06 16:44:48+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Accurate mapping.  
Squaring rectangular buildings.
Nodes connected to other objects.
Do not cluster buildings.
Trees don't grow inside buildings 



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132449825
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-12 15:30:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500819772
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500819774

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
streckenkundler (2023-02-13 13:55:36+00:00): Hei,

Sehr schön! Vielen Dank... Ich war in der anderen Kreisecke mit Häusern uns Adressen beschäftigt.

Falls dir mal bei Adressen die Straßenzuordnung fehlt ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3531560 ) , dann sei dir der Beitrag https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/adressen-in-brandenburg-als-hintergrund-ebene-fur-josm/6679 im Forum ans Herz gelegt. der liefert die nötigen Adressdaten. Das ist eine echte und sehr große Hilfe.

Viele Grüße,

Sven
uvi (2023-02-15 07:12:56+00:00): Hallo Sven, danke für den Tipp. Die Diskussion hatte ich verfolgt. Ich wollte nur nicht einfach so übernehmen und darüber hinaus "anonym" animieren, sich hier einzubringen ;)
VG Uwe
eggie (2023-02-12 16:10:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback..  access=private is oke.. , 
(eigenlijk is access=no al default op een slagboom) 
Of die daarmee hulpdiensten tegenhoudt .. even geen idee.
Volgens mij overruled Livenav access=private. Je zou emergency=no kunnen toevoegen.



MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-02-12 16:12:20+00:00): oneway=no niet taggen op reguliere paden en wegen. Dat doe we alleen als je bang bent dat een medemapper oneway=yes gaat taggen. Bv op een tweerichting fietsrotonde.

Gr eggie
Hufkratzer (2023-02-12 22:07:15+00:00): Hola,
Creo que has confundido las etiquetas de "Centro equestre" (leisure=horse_riding) y "Picadero" (leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian) en las siguientes áreas:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1121880851 (Hípica Yeduada Riaza)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098915245 (Hípica Eresma)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1144390144
Compara con
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
y
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1015428698 (Club Hípico Guadalajara)
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2024-02-03 21:25:10+00:00): Hi, welche Bedeutung soll das Tag network:type=rcn beim Lavantradweg haben?
YomanNH (2023-03-22 08:29:03+00:00): Cześć,
to jest oficjalna nazwa ronda, czy sam ją wymyśliłeś?
cyton (2023-02-12 19:37:21+00:00): Hallo, Willkommen bei OSM!

Wenn du magst, kannst du gern bei Matrix mit der Berliner Community Kontakt aufnehmen;
https://matrix.to/#/#osmberlin:matrix.org
siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Berlin#Kontakt_zur_Community
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132452654
marc__marc (2023-05-12 19:47:19+00:00): Maasai Mara National Reserve ou Masai Mara National Reserve ? il y a les 2 dans osm en ce moment
P-E_LRX (2023-05-13 10:32:00+00:00): Bonjour, c'est bien Masai Mara!
dbaron (2023-02-12 16:21:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 132453072 where the changeset comment is: Revert edit to wood areas that mistakenly touched park boundary.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-02-14 04:09:07+00:00): I'm not sure what you were trying to do here but I reverted this changeset because you dragged some nodes and disconnected nodes with seemingly no reason.
bxl-forever (2023-02-12 19:28:01+00:00): OK, thanks for warning with a fixme.

We removed this node, it is a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9199169371
Geo-Tobi (2024-05-16 20:12:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8089527
HW=footway & bicycle=designated. 
Das ist meiner Meinung nach eine ungültige Kombination.
nikospag (2023-02-15 03:20:15+00:00): Πάλι εδώ είσαι εσύ???????
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-02-14 22:40:55+00:00): Skulle det være en no_right eller er vejene forkerte?
b-holdet (2023-02-15 04:43:54+00:00): Noten https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3329487 skriver "Ingen venstresving"
Skal relationen laves anderledes?
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-02-15 09:30:53+00:00): Havde ikke set billedet.
Ja, så er det jo det meget korte stykke Nørregade mod syd der skal være "to".
b-holdet (2023-02-15 09:37:31+00:00): Det er ikke så meget jeg gør det i disse relationer, så jeg lærer noget nyt hver gang (-;
Jeg retter det senere.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-02-15 18:19:26+00:00): Ja, man skal huske at rutere kun bruger from, to, og via. Måske viser de et tilsvarene vejskilt på skærmen. Og så kan man bruge værdien af "restriction" til at lave et sanity check.
lyctkel (2023-02-12 17:09:48+00:00): Hi Jillis E,
Je was sneller met de correctie van access=customers.  :-)
Fijne zondag.
lyctkel
Jillis inactivE (2023-02-12 19:07:39+00:00): Ja, dat heb ik alsnog maar gedaan, al was ik het niet van plan omdat ik twijfelde over de begraafplaats (openbaar?). Parkeren is aangeduid voor bezoekers.
AntMadeira (2023-02-12 19:08:20+00:00): Olá, João.
Vi que fizeste algumas edições em Leiria. Espero que sejam as primeiras de muitas!

Quanto a esta alteração na escola da Guimarota, a escola já estava marcada na sua área, que é onde deve estar marcada, para indicar que toda a área corresponde à escola.
O edifício é apenas um edifício escolar.
A escola só coincide com o edifício se não tiver mais nenhuma área além do edifício em si.
Qualquer dúvida, é só dizeres.

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
João Pedro Tavares (2023-02-13 19:10:31+00:00): Boa noite António, espero que esteja tudo bem.

Ainda estou a perceber alguns aspetos da edição do mapa e por vezes, faço uns erros de principiante.  Obviamente, agradeço a resposta e explicação do erro.  Melhores cumprimentos de João Pedro Tavares.
AntMadeira (2023-02-13 19:23:16+00:00): Todos começámos por algum lado e todos temos dúvidas. ;)
Estamos cá para ajudar no que nos for possível.
Enviei-te uma mensagem privada para o teu perfil do OSM com mais informações, sobretudo algumas dicas iniciais que te poderão ajudar bastante. No canal do Telegram que indico aí também poderás encontrar uma comunidade bastante ativa.

No que toca a esta edição, existe um tópico importante nas bases do OSM:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3%A1ticas#Uma_caracter%C3%ADstica,_um_elemento_no_OSM

Cumprimentos,
António.
sannkc (2023-02-12 22:52:22+00:00): This definitely appears to be a combined cycle and foot path. The city's official bike map designates it as a trail that is open to bike use (https://www.kcmo.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/564/636953378455470000) and there is, so far as I can see in the streetside imagery, nothing posted to the contrary.

If you have additional questions about retagging existing cycle paths and foot paths in the KC area, please   raise them with the rest of the mapping community first.  There is an open discussion on Slack related to the tagging of bike paths in KC.  You are welcome to join.  If you prefer not to use Slack, feel free to start a discussion on the Talk-US Mailing List (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us).
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-02-28 20:26:37+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم تغيير اسم القرية لنفس القرية المجاورة
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-12 11:27:04+00:00): Hello!

You used
sac_scale=mountain_hiking----
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/294295414/history

Have you maybe meant
sac_scale=mountain_hiking
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Frans S (2023-02-16 11:14:10+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please tag highways in settlements  not as "service" but as unclassified or residential. See the wiki about tagging highways.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways
Best regards
38446 (2023-02-16 12:30:48+00:00): Thank you, yes, I know the guideline, but in this case way 791138049 was already tagged as service since three years ago, so I don't think changing it while mapping remotely is right because it may have been determined as a highway=service by survey.
NorthCrab (2023-02-13 00:52:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10652212576
O co chodziło Ci z tym noexit? Jest on tutaj umieszczony nieprawidłowo. Czy chodziło Ci może o wskazanie jakiejś bariery na drodze? Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab (2023-02-13 00:58:01+00:00): Chyba chodziło tutaj o zwykłe ogrodzenie. Już poprawiłem to oznaczenie.
woodpeck_repair (2023-03-03 00:50:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 133232206, 133232218, 133232224, 133232227, 133232225, 133232208, 133232216, 133232213, 133232177, 133232229, 133232203, 133232220, 133232198, 133232180, 133232189, 133224701, 133232215, 133232214, 133232188, 133232199, 133232207, 133232205, 133232182, 133232222, 133232186, 133232200, 133232191, 133232223, 133232209, 133232169, 133232230, 133232194, 133232197, 133232210 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import with unclear licensing in Madagascar
woodpeck_repair (2023-03-03 00:50:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 133232206, 133232218, 133232224, 133232227, 133232225, 133232208, 133232216, 133232213, 133232177, 133232229, 133232203, 133232220, 133232198, 133232180, 133232189, 133224701, 133232215, 133232214, 133232188, 133232199, 133232207, 133232205, 133232182, 133232222, 133232186, 133232200, 133232191, 133232223, 133232209, 133232169, 133232230, 133232194, 133232197, 133232210 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import with unclear licensing in Madagascar
woodpeck_repair (2023-03-03 00:51:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 133232206, 133232218, 133232224, 133232227, 133232225, 133232208, 133232216, 133232213, 133232177, 133232229, 133232203, 133232220, 133232198, 133232180, 133232189, 133224701, 133232215, 133232214, 133232188, 133232199, 133232207, 133232205, 133232182, 133232222, 133232186, 133232200, 133232191, 133232223, 133232209, 133232169, 133232230, 133232194, 133232197, 133232210 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import with unclear licensing in Madagascar
map per (2023-02-14 14:21:42+00:00): Wegen "Meine Änderungen überprüfen":
Weil dort auch ein Überweg ist hab ich das jetzt als Überweg mit Mittelinsel und nicht als Verkehrsinsel eingetragen.
(crossing=uncontrolled
highway=crossing
crossing:island=yes)

Viele Grüße
map per
Frans S (2023-02-15 13:11:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
I have comments about tagging service roads.
Please follow the rules on this wiki, when and how to tag service roads.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways
Most of your taggings could be better tagged as residential.
Best regards
Frans S (2023-02-15 14:38:53+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
most buildings are not squared.
High buildings are incorrect mapped. Map over the roofline and move the whole mapping to the footprint. Do not include sidewalls and shadows into your mappings.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132456185
Discostu36 (2024-11-11 19:28:17+00:00): Bitte nicht kommentarlos maxspeed-Werte löschen.
aTarom (2023-02-13 15:07:46+00:00): Hi, Yaaaaaaaa,
do you know why the names remain when deleting the duplicated amenity? is the osmose editor that leaves them?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/619872530/history

Cheers
Yaaaaaaaa (2023-03-01 14:09:22+00:00): hi Tarom,
Osmose only removes the redundant tags.
The 'name' tag is not redundant.
It should be on the building instead of the node, but that's another problem, I let you fix it ;-)
francians (2023-02-12 19:25:47+00:00): Ciao,

Potresti anche togliere la chiave parking?
Grazie per il contributo
Francesco
chris66 (2023-04-01 18:58:07+00:00): Hi, alle PLZ eventuell falsch in Kuschkow?

Laut Geobasis: 15913.
streckenkundler (2023-04-01 19:31:33+00:00): Hmpf...

Siehe https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/neue-postcodes-map/97595/9

Asche aufs Haupt nützt nichts mehr... Haare sich bereits weiß.. :)

Sven
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-12 22:06:53+00:00): Czy weryfikowałeś w jakiś sposób te notatki z MAPS.ME?

Czy ta edycja tylko na podstawie https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2044594 była zrobiona?
user_9642867 (2023-02-13 14:26:15+00:00): Potwierdzone wizją lokalną.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-13 15:32:06+00:00): A to super! Jak zmiana jest na podstawie wizyty na miejscu to warto o tym wspomnieć w opisie zmian lub źródła dodać
canfe (2023-02-13 05:49:30+00:00): Incominciamo a dire che Po è scritto male.
Ma poi è davvero quello il nome?
Si deve intendere parco di Castagnto Po il paese?
Sicuramente poi non è un "park". Se leggi la wiki capisci che in OSM i park son tutt'altro.
Puoi correggere?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132458119
Andrea Musuruane (2023-02-13 17:22:04+00:00): L'ho rimosso.
rhtb0 (2023-02-13 09:25:40+00:00): 안녕하세요
주거 도로를 서비스 도로로 변경하는 이유가 무엇인가요?
Carto'Cité (2023-04-17 12:39:06+00:00): Salut Max,
Je vois que tu fais des corrections avec Osmose sur les aménagements cyclables tels que celui-ci :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1079205434
Mais le résultat semble incomplet. Il vaut mieux mettre cycleway:both=lane plutôt que cycleway=lane sinon l'aménagement va repasser sous StreetComplete par exemple.
N’hésite pas à me dire si tu as des remarques ou des questions.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
Max-Kritic (2023-04-17 14:24:47+00:00): Pour moi, both n'est pas nécessaire s'il y a des bandes cyclables dans les deux sens. Mais, je vais vérifier.
Carto'Cité (2023-04-17 14:29:31+00:00): Oui il n'était pas vraiment nécessaire effectivement mais crois moi il évite que l'aménagement soit à nouveau proposé sous StreetComplete et potentiellement mal décrit. Et il lève assez bien l'ambiguïté sur le fait qu'il puisse y avoir 2 aménagement différents de part et d'autre.
Charles
Max-Kritic (2023-04-17 14:41:07+00:00): Je vais vérifier avec streetcomplet dans une rue prêt de chez moi avec deux bandes cyclables. 

Il faut de toute façon de plus en plus de détail comme la largeur des bandes cyclables. Là où j'habite Geovelo trace des bandes cyclables larges d'un m le long du stationnement (portières) et des arrêts de bus (angle mort). Pour l'instant, la largeur des bandes est le seul critère de qualité que je connais.
Carto'Cité (2023-04-17 14:45:32+00:00): Je suis d'accord que les largeurs en générale, c'est une super données. Elle est très peu utilisée pour l'instant par les calculateurs mais ça viendra donc oui c'est bien de les renseigner :)
Charles
Max-Kritic (2023-04-17 14:49:44+00:00): J'ai aussi réalisé le réseau de bus de Rouen en version 2
Carto'Cité (2023-04-17 14:52:15+00:00): Ça c'est un gros boulot 😀
dzamper (2026-01-07 08:23:16+00:00): woda na cmentarzu jest pitna?
mark2525 (2026-01-07 11:28:33+00:00): To jest normalna woda z sieci wodociągowej. Teraz na większości cmentarzy tak jest.
Illio (2023-02-20 14:36:30+00:00): Áno, ide o obchvat Bratislavy, každopádne, to nie je názov. Tento obchvat nemá oficiálny názov okrem označenia Diaľnica D4.
mapko (2023-04-27 20:36:30+00:00): Fjana, je to ako uvadza Illio. Prosim obnovit povodny stav. Dakujem.
Fjana (2023-04-28 09:34:18+00:00): Opraveno, název odebrán, omlouvám se za chybu, vycházel jsem z názvu na uvedeném odkazu: https://www.cdb.sk/sk/cestna-siet-SR/vybrane-zmeny-v-cestnej-sieti/2021-vybrane-zmeny/d4-obchvat-BA.alej
mapko (2023-04-28 21:46:32+00:00): Dakujeme :)
aceman444 (2024-08-07 21:12:52+00:00): A to este podla stranky, ktoru uvadzate ako zdroj samotny obchvat zacina na krizovatke D2xD4, nie na hranicnom priechode s Rakuskom. Takze nabuduce opatrnejsie.
Una tantum (2025-11-05 13:19:06+00:00): Ciao Danysan95, ho aperto la nota 5039344 come esempio, perché non so come ci coordiniamo: le tombe nel Famedio per ora hanno 3 personaggi per nodo, ma abbiamo scoperto insieme che a un livello più alto, nella cupola, ci sarebbe un quarto sepolto. Il quarto sepolto di ogni "colonna" di lapidi, lo mappiamo nello stesso nodo o creiamo un nuovo nodo? non so decidere, perché le tre lapidi sono proprio vicine, la quarta in alto sembra quasi separata concettualmente. Dimmi tu.
Una tantum (2025-11-05 13:23:57+00:00): Altra cosa: qui https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q136697604#P119 devo mettere le stesse coordinate del nodo, ma quale? devo capire se va bene il nodo preesistente per poterlo fare (sempre per l'esempio, si tratta di più item, ci sono altri item di persone sepolte nel Famedio che ho creato da compilare su wikidata per le coordinate)