piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Brian@Brea (2023-08-03 06:02:41+00:00): I have been told in the past that the tag virtual=yes was for routing purposes (if you can give me some time I might be able to pull the comment on a different changeset). There has been a long term disagreement on mapping pedestrian areas in the park with either ways connecting to points interest or using area=yes tags in defining the whole area. So I personally lean towards the area method but when I map new areas use highway=footway/pedestrian  ways to build the skeleton until I can nail down the landscape features and then draw an enclosed way with both the tags highway=pedestrian and area=yes to encompass the area. But in the past I have just turned the tags on the skeleton ways off with the idea that the future when the debate was settled I can retag them in whatever the new agreed format would be. I in the past few weeks have been called out by different moderator for forgetting to change blank ways to something as have ways in the system with no tags is considered improper. So about a year ago I was involved with another mod sweep and was told to set the ways to highway=footway and virtual=yes and I forgot to get around to it. So I finally fixed it against my better judgment. Personally I want to delete the ways but then you lose the ability to use navigation, so I am unsure how to proceed.
Barroszt (2024-04-20 23:43:11+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150283408
Glassman (2023-07-25 02:24:51+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138962465
ashs_as (2023-07-27 08:48:27+00:00): Hello Sandervalya;
I see you used an old image and reverted my edit, also I mentioned in my source that I used "Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-01-31"
Changeset that you reverted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136242030
I Fixed this location again and used the last satellite image "Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-06-29".
Changeset that I have fixed now: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139074529
Please check the source for changeset before you make any revert.
Regards
ashs_as
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 16:07:48+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145298170
JstnMcBrd (2023-07-25 05:56:27+00:00): Please stop reverting my valid changes. They are all verifiable. If you travel to these locations, you will find my changes are correct. This meets the OSM standard for verifiability. See the first sentence: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability

Continuing to specifically target me and my changes could be considered retaliatory harassment. Only revert changes you know to be incorrect, and only after discussing the specific issue with those changes. Thank you.
ovruni (2023-07-25 06:46:41+00:00): Hola, dado que no hay nada oculto en la comunidad peruana ni tampoco preferencia por ningún usuario que no se encuentra sobre el terreno para poder agregar micromapeo con fuente desconocidas es que le informo que he mandado un mensaje a la lista de correos [0] y al grupo de telegram de la comunidad peruana [1], grupo sobre el cual le escrito anteriormente en el conjunto de cambios 138920294 [2]. En caso desee intervenir tanto en la lista de correos como en el grupo de telegram de la comunidad peruana es bienvenido. 
Saludos
[0] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-pe/2023-July/000928.html
[1] https://t.me/osmpe
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138920294
JstnMcBrd (2023-07-25 08:28:42+00:00): I apologize if I am coming across as rude. I am just upset about all the changes I made being removed.

I will delete all of the linked images after you review them, because I am not comfortable with those images being public.

Perhaps we can take this discussion to our direct messages in the future to avoid sharing my personal information.
ovruni (2023-07-25 23:30:08+00:00): Hola, el tema aquí son las fuentes de los datos al momento de realizar el mapeo mas no si alguien ha viajado hace un tiempo atrás a algún lugar, lo que no necesariamente significa que recuerde cada pequeño detalle de ese lugar como para micromapearlo con elementos con banderas, puertas, bancas, anchos de muros, etc (yo mismo encuentro nuevas cosas recién luego de mirar mis fotos que ingresé a Mapillary o Wikimedia Commons) Con respecto a los datos de Google, se puede observar que números de casa como "H5H2+QRG" o nombres de calle como "Apv. Tarapata S/N" no forman parte de la realidad peruana sino de formas de representación de Google. Por favor no utilizar datos de google mapa el mapeo de OSM (ya sea satelital, a vista de calle, etc) En su lugar por favor agregar una imagen en el conjunto de cambios que vaya a agregar, no importa si tienen partes difuminadas, los servicios como mapillary también realizan el difuminado de rostros.
Aunque ninguna de las imágenes posee las coordenadas del lugar en que se encuentran, gracias por compartirlas. Luego de revisar las imágenes tenga por seguro que voy a restaurar los objetos que se puedan visualizar en dichas imágenes que ha compartido.
Saludos
NorthCrab (2023-07-27 23:42:43+00:00): Reverted for vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139110961
janolezab (2023-07-25 16:44:31+00:00): Again?
Very civilised to delete a language. Put this effort into helping Ukraine.
glibbertorsten (2023-07-25 10:05:39+00:00): Russia belongs to the civilized world. Theres no first, second or third world. Theres only one. All humans included.
Britzz (2023-07-25 07:13:16+00:00): Hello, you deleted the russian translation of "Champ de Mars" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4208595/history) among many other objects, this is vandalism (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism), please stop and revert your own changesets.
Taya_S (2023-07-25 07:53:56+00:00): They're already banned and the DWG is in the process of reverting.
grin (2024-08-14 08:16:41+00:00): Hello! 
May I ask what kind of device have you used to "fix" the 50 cm accurate RTK measuments? (accuracy=0.5)
Thanks!
AlwynWellington (2024-08-16 03:05:36+00:00): Hi

My focus, as noted in the changeset comment, was to record the ST303 section of a hiking route.

Would you please help by:
describing "RTK" elements 
and
where they feature in my edits.

Kind regards.
kobibij (2023-07-25 07:47:57+00:00): The civilized world rejects any language promoting harm, including that of criminals. Instead, let's focus on uplifting topics like "best quilts" to celebrate creativity and warmth in our communities.
https://linensrange.co.uk/product-category/quilts/
kobibij (2023-07-25 07:48:45+00:00): The civilized world rejects any language promoting harm, including that of criminals. Instead, let's focus on uplifting topics like "best quilts" to celebrate creativity and warmth in our communities.
 https://shoesofpickle.com/?fbclid=IwAR1Vs2l9gfqGAa2x4xsXv78NksUtD9Y_fGgs3zBaOjza_Z6zLNTwqSUMQbk
eggie (2023-07-30 09:59:47+00:00): Hi Sd

Please don't map worldwide. This may harm the map.
Why deleting a lot of data from the map for this reason? 

Greetz,
eggie
Tolstoi21 (2023-07-25 07:02:46+00:00): Reverted this changeset. Couldn't agree more that the war in Ukraine is horrible and and completely unjust, but let's keep valuable data on the map.
tyfi (2023-07-25 01:05:15+00:00): Some names need to be verified.
tyfi (2023-07-25 01:10:27+00:00): ^ Reason for this is because USGSHydroCached isn't precise about exactly where a named stretch ends, so I inferred that based on waterway connections. There likely isn't an issue.
Herman Lee (2023-07-25 04:31:57+00:00): 您好，这个地方似乎没有对应的站点，是不是您要指一旁的沪青平公路七莘路站点，待会儿会进行删除。
nyampire (2023-07-26 02:06:27+00:00): こんにちは、OSMへようこそ。

入力いただいた地物なのですが、恒常的に設置されているものではなく、花火大会イベントのための一時的なもののようです。

OSMでは、一時的に設置される地物については、入力が推奨されていません。
なので、できれば削除したいと考えています。

もし、地図上に特定のアイコンなどを表示させたい、という目的であれば、uMap (https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/ja/) などを使ってみるのはどうでしょうか。

ご検討いただけると嬉しいです。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138964036
oba510 (2023-07-27 02:37:30+00:00): Please familiarize yourself with the meaning of highway=pedestrian and area=yes before continuing to remove the tags from pedestrian plazas.  Please take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian#Squares_and_plazas 

highway=pedestrian is entirely appropriate for this and similar features. It is a paved area, built for and traversal by people on foot.
user_18023081 (2023-07-25 01:27:12+00:00): stfu
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-25 06:14:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138965912 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7332
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-09-16 02:26:55+00:00): @SomeoneElse @SomeoneElse_Revert

I noticed only ways was restored in 138965912 while 252 name removal in relations haven't been treated. Is it because the script used by revert has a bug? (Since those users are hidden, I can't check using a script to crawl their edit history)
SomeoneElse (2023-09-16 09:18:27+00:00): The revert here was done via the perl revert scripts, which turned out to be not fast enough to deal with the issue, hence other methods being used for the problems through August (this was a very early case of that vandalism).  If you look at https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/759814358 for example you can see that many different accounts subsequently vandalised the ways affected here.
emersonveenstra (2023-07-25 11:03:01+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138982704. OpenStreetMap is used worldwide, please do not add fictitious places to the map, thanks!
kimo (2023-08-01 08:19:47+00:00): Why did you delete the service=parking tag instead of correcting it to service=parking_aisle?
tastrax (2023-08-02 00:11:16+00:00): Hi Kimo - In most cases they were not an aisle in a parking lot. If its the only road in then then the service road tag is sufficient. If there is parking alongside the road then different tags could be added to indicate parking along the road.
emersonveenstra (2023-07-25 11:02:56+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138982704. OpenStreetMap is used worldwide, please do not add fictitious places to the map, thanks!
rskedgell (2023-07-25 06:25:25+00:00): Thanks for updating this, but please don't remove the building=* tag unless the building has actually gone.
MxxCon (2023-07-25 03:34:04+00:00): Hello.
What is the source of these changes?

CSX is already in the operator tag, why add it to the name?

Also, "Medium" is an invalid tag value. All tag values in OSM(other than names) must be lower case.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138964929
stewmgone (2023-07-25 12:08:02+00:00): operator name does not appear in OpenRailMap. Operator name is added to yard name to improve user readability. I agree its redundant, but OpenRailMap does not have an interface for clicking a point to access details. "medium" is a valid size for railroad yard.
MxxCon (2023-07-25 12:16:02+00:00): "medium" is valid. "Medium" is invalid.

Changing OSM data to contain redundant info because some specific map site/style doesn't display desired info is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer and is considered bad practice.

In OSM first and foremost the data must be accurate. How it is displayed is up to each map style. If that map style is missing some critical information, that style should be updated, not OSM data mangled to fit that incomplete style.
Minh Nguyen (2024-05-29 05:59:25+00:00): Hi, it looks like you may have inadvertently tagged a 770-acre swath as “Bus Parking”. In changeset 151971891, I undid that and tried to identify the school bus depot you were referring to, the one at Vine and Murray. Feel free to make corrections as necessary. Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2023-07-25 11:02:52+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138982704. OpenStreetMap is used worldwide, please do not add fictitious places to the map, thanks!
emersonveenstra (2023-07-25 11:02:49+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138982704. OpenStreetMap is used worldwide, please do not add fictitious places to the map, thanks!
emersonveenstra (2023-07-25 11:02:38+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138982704. OpenStreetMap is used worldwide, please do not add fictitious places to the map, thanks!
Supaplex (2023-07-25 07:00:28+00:00): Hi alpalm

Could you specific what are you adding, because you do not tell us the type of store or amenity you are adding.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138965517
Supaplex (2023-07-25 07:00:33+00:00): Hi alpalm

Could you specific what are you adding, because you do not tell us the type of store or amenity you are adding.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138965532
Enock4seth (2023-07-25 10:13:09+00:00): You are trying to map an ATM but this is not how you do it. 

You already added similar feature at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11066116705 which should be move to it's appropriate position.

Kindly delete the duplicate and move other point to it's location.
Leticia Makafui (2023-07-25 16:29:02+00:00): Thanks for the feedback @Enock4seth.
I have deleted the duplicate. Kindly send me your feedback if the problem is solved.
user_5359 (2023-07-25 09:44:59+00:00): Hello (AGAIN)! Please STOP the insert of foreign keys!
Messinian (2024-03-18 04:05:04+00:00): Hi Duga,  I noticed that you tagged a number of ponds as water=basin. example here: (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046342439/history/2)
My understanding is that the basin tag is typically used in the context of water management. from the wikipage: ..."Usually these features are made for man made water courses e.g. storm water, water treatment."

Is there a reason you chose this tag instead of water=pond?  Many of these are just small ponds that landowners have created or modified. Often they are spring fed.  Generally they are for recreation, more than water management. 

Would you object if I modified these tags?
DUGA (2024-03-18 22:12:41+00:00): I believe none of these naturally exist, they are all artificial lakes which is why I tag all of them as basin.
nevw (2023-07-25 23:36:30+00:00): Hi
I noticed osmi picked up errors in the Berrinba Wetlands.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.08083&lat=-27.66922&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik+Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
nevw (2023-07-25 23:38:11+00:00): This link may be better
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.09013&lat=-27.66776&zoom=14
Tech Dec (2023-07-28 03:24:34+00:00): Thanks for the tip and link nevw. I believe I've fixed the errors in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139114228

I've still got some more ungluing to do around the industrial area.
jAuer (2023-10-16 21:26:32+00:00): Drüber gestolpert, daß in der Humboldtstraße diverse Häuser (1-7) fehlen. Grund: Die Häuser sind mit "Humboldtstrase" getaggt.

Bitte diese Schreibfehler korrigieren.
jAuer (2023-10-16 21:28:52+00:00): PS: Nee, noch schlimmer: Humboldstrase - Humboldt ohne t.
user_14063915 (2023-10-17 05:18:05+00:00): Anstatt zu meckern hättest es auch anpassen können. Sind alles nur Menschen....
user_14063915 (2023-10-17 05:18:44+00:00): Und den Straßen Tag gleich mit dann ist der nämlich auch falsch.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-07-25 08:40:52+00:00): 我已经在 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138975858 中将其还原

I have reverted it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138975858
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-07-25 08:40:50+00:00): 我已经在 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138975858 中将其还原

I have reverted it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138975858
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-07-25 08:40:07+00:00): “Fila Viet Nam”，您好，我很理解您希望“捍卫越南的主权独立与领土完整”的心情，但OSM是一个基于实控的地图，您将永暑岛上的地名更改为越南语不能解决实际问题，还会被认为对数据的破坏。因此我已经在 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138975858 中将其还原。如果您坚持将其更改为越南语名称，我将向 data@openstreetmap.org 举报。
如果您对此有疑问，亦请写邮件请DWG来仲裁。

(Machine Translated) Xin chào "Fila Việt Nam", tôi hiểu mong muốn của bạn là "bảo vệ chủ quyền, độc lập và toàn vẹn lãnh thổ của Việt Nam", nhưng OSM là bản đồ dựa trên sự kiểm soát thực tế, việc bạn thay đổi địa danh trên đảo Yongshu sang tiếng Việt không thể giải quyết được vấn đề thực tế mà còn bị coi là làm hỏng dữ liệu. Vì vậy, tôi đã hoàn nguyên nó trong https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138975858. Nếu bạn nhất quyết đổi sang tên tiếng Việt, tôi sẽ báo cáo về data@openstreetmap.org.
Nếu bạn nghi ngờ về điều này, vui lòng cũng viết email yêu cầu DWG đứng ra phân xử.
Tyeniz001 (2023-07-25 05:13:01+00:00): Municipal boundary is not render becaused of two provinces. This Pigcawayan was part of Cotabato. not Maguindanao del Norte with some barangays. Fix it?
Timmy_Tesseract (2023-07-26 04:33:55+00:00): This part of the provincial boundary was very likely traced by hand purely based on guesswork (see history version 1 from 2014). It would be great if you could improve the alignment to be more accurate. 

By the way, are you using any sources other than existing openstreetmap data when adding municipal boundaries? If yes please always mention them in your changesets.

In this case it seems that the actual boundary of Pigcawayan is somewhere in between the currently mapped provincial boundary and the municipal boundary you added. Have a look at the area around Panatan which is part of Sultan Kudarat municipality.

Boundaries of Barira will need to be revised too, there's currently a big overlap with Pigcawayan.

Thanks for your efforts!
Andrea Musuruane (2023-07-27 10:26:28+00:00): Ciao. Cos'è questo name=sorgente + man_made=cellar_entrance?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138969006
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-25 06:00:20+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5336456229
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7245866774
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11066242033
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5336456228
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006622960
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006622961
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006622963
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165180411

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Acredrom7 (2023-09-11 15:14:31+00:00): Cześć! Dzięki za znalezienie brakującego przejazdu rowerowego. Na podkładzie CyclOSM widzę jednak, że masz podwójnie otagowaną ścieżkę rowerową. Jeżeli dobrze rozumiem ze zdjęcia, to w zasadzie ten chodnik i ścieżka nie są niczym fizycznie od siebie oddzielone, więc możesz je wyrazić jedną linią. Proszę, rzuć okiem na: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery żeby zobaczyć wyjaśnienie. Myślę. że przydadzą ci się szczególnie przykłady od S3 do S5. Miłego mapowania!
user_5359 (2023-07-25 06:45:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys).
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-25 06:12:55+00:00): see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rock-glaciers-retagged-as-moraines/101589 and https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rock-glaciers-retagged-as-moraines/101589/10

(for avoidance of any doubt, I made this edit in 100% personal capacity)
Hungerburg (2023-07-30 20:48:07+00:00): On the ESRI imagery, those look like true rock glaciers, some exemplary so!
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-31 08:32:50+00:00): it is entirely possible that idea behind this change was a good one

revert was primarily because user refused to communicate, started another retagging 

And when (maybe after this edit) asked to communicate by DWG they just deleted their account
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-31 08:34:09+00:00): (I have no strong opinion which tags are preferred here, but I have strong preference to responding when someone taggfiddles and their edits were challenged - especially if they continue to run other tag migrations at that time)
Hungerburg (2023-07-31 09:16:44+00:00): I just wanted to say, you did right with the revert. Yesterday I doubled the number of geological=rock_glacier mappings. There is now documentation in the wiki. So it should be safe from well-meant, wrong outcome.
sjodl_ (2024-02-10 20:59:26+00:00): Hej,
czy osobiście sprawdziłaś/eś, że ten punkt widokowy naprawdę tam istnieje?
SandeckiLachGóral (2024-02-11 14:06:03+00:00): Nie ma, jednakże są z tamtąd fajne widoki i można se postać i pooglądać.
little_maper (2023-07-26 07:36:14+00:00): Hello Muhammad Hareery;
 I see you added some streets that didn't exist in any satellite images.
Links:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1191981751
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1191981277
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1191981582
Could you provide us with the source you used to add these streets?
Regards
little_maper
Tjuro (2023-07-25 07:06:42+00:00): hoi AnkEric,

Waarom verander je dit naar unclassified?

Ik zou eerder zeggen dat deze way is voor nummer 7 en daarmee als hoofddoel een driveway, dat een fietser een oprijlaan kan en mag gebruiken is een zij doel en maakt naar mijn mening iets nog geen unclassified

MVG Tjuro
AnkEric (2023-07-25 08:01:45+00:00): Ook hier lag de splitsing van twee highways óp de service=driveway. Daarom kan ik het niet zelf oplossen op mijn eigen kaart (dataset).
highway=service betekent: toegangsweg. Een doorgaande weg is nooit highway=service.
Als een weg én toegangsweg (oprijlaan) én doorgaande weg dan is doorgaande weg belangrijker, meer kenmerkend. 
Op een driveway zijn er geen zorgen over kruisende fietsers, want het is immers een "privé" oprijlaan.
De verbinding tussen een fietspad en een secondary is unclassified. Geen service. Ook niet als hier bicycle=use_sidepath geldt.
Bovendien heeft het segment, dat ik nu heb gewijzigd in unclassified, {bicycle=use_sidepath} want dit stuk loopt voor fietsers dood op de N658 (tenzij de fiets breder is dan 75 cm).
Ik zie nu dus duidelijk dat ik deze weg niet moet volgen naar huisnummer 8.
Maar ik zie nu ook dat er voor huisnummer 8 een path (betonplaten) ontbreekt dat wél toegang geeft tot dit woonhuis (zie: Mappliary).
Tenslotte is het zeer de vraag op highway=service + service=driveway tot huisnummer 7 correct is. Want deze oprijlaan loopt gewoon door en verbindt met Koelhuisdreef. En ook dat zou een highway=unclassified moeten zijn. Want ook doorgaande weg.
Dit is iets dat ik wél op mijn eigen kaart (dataset) kan oplossen en dat ga ik ook doen.