piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jay May (2025-07-17 07:20:48+00:00): Exactly. Russian is AN official language (but the 2nd official language). Not THE official language.
The main official language is Kyrgyz, roadsigns are in Kyrgyz, whether you like other languages than Russian or not. I am just abiding by the rules of OSM Kyrgyzstan, which you will not be doing if you revert my changes.
As you noticed if you have a closer look, I do NEVER remove the Russian name, I just put it in its right place: name:ru as per OSM Kyrgyzstan rules. Just like it is already in Belarus, for instance. Removing Kyrgyz names from the "name" tag, putting back Soviet names where they are not relevant anymore means *vandalizing* OSM and will be systematically reported.
Btw, I don't use name xy (WITW is that???) ;) I just put the correct names in Kyrgyz in the "name" tag, as should be in Kyrgyzstan.
I do not use Google Translate, btw.
In case you are not aware, just as a reminder, here are the rules for OSM Kyrgyzstan:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kyrgyzstan#Languages 

"Most roadsigns are in Kyrgyz language on the spot (transliterated into latin script). As Russian still remains widely used, it must still be maintained too. Hence, for toponyms (locality names, street names, province names, national parks, lakes, etc.), the 4 following name tags must always be filled as per rules below:

name=* tag must be filled with the Kyrgyz name (which means it must be identical to name:ky=*). The exception to this rule is commercial names. Shop, gas stations, etc. In such cases, the name=* tag must be identical as on the spot, whatever its language.
name:ky=* must be filled with the Kyrgyz name
name:ru=* must be filled with the Russian name
int_name=* must be filled with the Kyrgyz latin official transliteration (ex.: Ош becomes Oş and not Osh! You can however use "Osh" in the name:en tag, however)"
one_half_3544 (2025-07-22 15:05:22+00:00): It doesn't matter what tool you use, automatic translations aren't welcome.

The wiki page was modified by some random person https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Kyrgyzstan&diff=2452536&oldid=2099793, I don't see any community discussion
johsin18 (2025-07-09 06:19:04+00:00): Hi WilliamHarrison,
your change was correct in principle, but it broke the bicycle routes.  I have fixed that again.
johsin18
pwbriggs (2025-07-07 18:40:47+00:00): Thanks for the contribution. A more appropriate & machine-readable way of tagging this might be with a [lifecycle prefix] on the building. You can read up about these lifecycle tags on the wiki page I linked, but it sounds like `destroyed:building` would work here if the building still remains, otherwise `demolished:building` if it's been demolished since the fire but still shows up in aerial imagery.

Thanks again, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

[lifecycle prefix]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
pwbriggs (2025-07-07 18:44:32+00:00): For clarity, the lifecycle prefix would be applied to the tag name, e.g. `building=house` can be replaced with `destroyed:building=house`. In the default editor, iD, you can manually change the tag name by scrolling to the bottom of the "Edit Feature" menu and updating the appropriate tag name.

Let me know if you have any questions!
s banerian (2025-07-08 04:57:31+00:00): thanks. i have edited.
pwbriggs (2025-07-09 07:04:19+00:00): Thanks!
mavl (2025-07-08 15:24:49+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок понизил статус дороги с tertiary до residential. В результате нарушилась связность дорог.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Additional_rules_to_highway_classification
NeisBot (2025-07-07 18:50:35+00:00): Hi f0restr1, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 97% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 32 highway(s)
- 1 building(s)
- 2 waterway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=168619104
woodpeck (2025-07-07 23:07:06+00:00): Hallo f0restr1, ich habe die Löschungen rückgängig gemacht. Sie widersprechen unseren Regeln; nur, weil die Nutzung eines Weges durch die Allgemeinheit verboten ist, heisst das nicht, dass er gelöscht werden soll. Im Detail ist das hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F erklärt. Bitte beschränke Löschugnen künftig auf das, was tatsächlich vor Ort nicht mehr sichtbar ist.
NeisReview (2025-07-08 15:52:59+00:00): Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional.

However, your changeset has been reverted, as mentioned above.
Matt McCutchen (2025-07-15 22:29:52+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out.  I performed the deletion in https://osm.org/changeset/168986891.  To delete part of an OSM way, you would select both the way and the cutoff point, use the "split" command, and then delete one of the two ways left after the split.

In the future, if you need a change made to the map but are not sure how to perform it, it's better to create a note with the information (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes) than to add dummy data to the map.  Thanks for your contributions!
ivanbranco (2025-07-25 15:19:00+00:00): Ciao guggis,

ricordati di aggiungere il prefisso "File:" ai valori di wikimedia commons, come da regole della wiki. Ho visto che ne hai inseriti un bel po'... https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/37111

Grazie e buon mapping!
bartgron (2025-07-07 20:03:05+00:00): Wycofano:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168621898
NeisBot (2025-07-07 19:16:59+00:00): Hi dogukann35, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added new farmland areas by creating nodes and ways, tagging them as landuse=farmland."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
bartgron (2025-07-07 20:02:36+00:00): Wycofano:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168621888
Glassman (2025-07-07 23:59:53+00:00): If they have been closed and unlikely to come back, you can just delete the business. If the address was added, leave it since it will likely be reused.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168619892
Patchanka (2025-07-08 09:12:51+00:00): bonjour,

je vois que vous changez les noms de bâtiments en addr:housename.
Pourquoi cette modif ? L'utilisation du tag name sur le building me semble pertinent s'agissant du nom d'un bâtiment.

Quoi qu'il en soit je vois qu'il s'agit d'un "bot", avez vous documenté quelque part (et validé avec la communauté) ce que vous faites ? par exemple sur le wiki ou sur le forum 

merci d'avance
Davidos64 (2025-07-08 16:00:39+00:00): Bien le bonjour,

Je suis le propriétaire du compte "Davidos64bot", au sujet du tag addr=housename. J'avais vu que dans la plupart des pays, la question avait déjà été traité mais en France le sujet semble floue et j'ai aperçu que sur le forum la question s'était déjà posé à plusieurs reprises et que la question à été résolu, exemple https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/search?q=Housename

Au sujet de la documentation c'est en cours, il faut que je crée et écrive une page sur le wiki (j'avais eu quelques soucis mais ça a été réglé depuis, je le crée lorsque j'aurais du temps). J'avais été validé par un membre de l'équipe "monde" de openstreetmap après une discussion par mail. J'étais venue le dernier jour au Sotm-fr à Tours pour poser la question à plusieurs membres de l'orga et j'ai eu des accords oraux, l'écrit est venu plus tard 

Davidos64
Patchanka (2025-07-09 07:58:51+00:00): bonjour

cela me laisse très perplexe... Déjà sur l'usage de ce tag adresse ailleurs que le reste de l'adresse (n°, rue...), une adresse pouvant être affectée à un bâtiment ou à autre chose, et un bâtiment pouvant avoir plusieurs adresses... Je ne vois aucune logique à ne pas utiliser le tag name à partir du moment où le nom est écrit sur la maison, c'est son nom... Après je ne vais pas batailler là dessus plus que ça même si je ne suis pas d'accord.

Par contre je trouve ça un peu bizarre de documenter après avoir fait les modifs en masse... Il me semble qu'il y a une différence entre ajouter des données d'une façon, ou bien d'écraser ("corriger") tout ce qui a été saisi par d'autres de manière systématique sur tout un territoire, sans prendre la peine de les en informer et d'en discuter un minimum.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-08 10:47:08+00:00): Please keep traffic signals. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals (section Tagging also cycleway traffic signals, applied to pedestrian crossings too)
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-08 10:49:10+00:00): Can you link to the MapRoulette Challenge you were using? Is the challenge telling you to remove directional traffic signals for pedestrian?
Leo Slager (2025-07-09 10:21:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
canfe (2026-02-04 11:22:38+00:00): Il telefono non è nel formato corretto.
Sistemo.
canfe (2026-02-04 11:24:02+00:00): Ed anche il civico.
Controlla la wiki prima.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-08 10:43:10+00:00): Please keep traffic signals on pedestrian crossings and cycleway crossings. It makes it possible to add penalties in OSRM and other routing engines. Almost all intersections with traffic signals in the Montreal area that have been updated have them. Thanks!
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-14 06:18:23+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168889901
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-25 03:24:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413109296/history

są jakieś konkretne plany budowy tej drogi?
w_morland (2025-07-07 19:57:49+00:00): Hi there, thanks for this edit. I saw this changeset by chance but because there wasn't a source I couldn't work out how you manage to map all the solar panels. Where can I find the right aerial imagery for this region please? Thank you!
eerib (2025-07-08 17:29:45+00:00): Vandalism Account.

All changesets have been fully reverted.

(168652838, 168652750, 168652635, 168652537, 168652410, 168652361, 168651875, 168651735, 168621866, 168621607)
eerib (2025-07-08 17:29:39+00:00): Vandalism Account.

All changesets have been fully reverted.

(168652838, 168652750, 168652635, 168652537, 168652410, 168652361, 168651875, 168651735, 168621866, 168621607)
silversurfer83 (2025-07-08 18:55:17+00:00): Hi :)

es sieht so aus, als wären dies die Gärbehälter einer Biogasanlage:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Ddigester

Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168621906
dadavid (2025-08-06 09:22:36+00:00): Hi seichter, 

ich fand die Gehege waren vorher gar nicht so schlecht getaggt. attraction=animal passt doch ganz gut. Zwei Zoos [1] gibt es in Eningen ja nicht. 

Wie siehst du das? :) 

Viele Grüße 

David 

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism=zoo?uselang=de
seichter (2025-08-06 17:25:51+00:00): In Deutschland darf sich eine Einrichtung erst Zoo nennen, wenn sie mindestens vier Tierarten hat und mindestens eine davon kein Huftier.
Aber OSM hat ja seine eigenen Begriffe und dort läuft ein schnödes Wildgehege im deutschen Wiki unter tourism=zoo samt enclosure. Zur Fleischproduktion dienen sie mMn nicht, da praktisch in jedem Wildgehege zur Bestandskontrolle Tiere "entnommen" werden müssen, die dann auf der Speisekarte der umliegenden Gasthäuser auftauchen. Die Hauptfunktion ist das aber nicht.
Im englischen Wiki ist das alles so genau nicht spezifiziert, aber widerspricht jedenfalls nicht dem deutschen.
Über attraction kann man sich streiten, mir würde das "Wildgehege" reichen, es beißt sich aber ja nicht mit tourism=zoo.
Was auf jeden Fall aber überfüssig ist, ist das animal=*, denn die genaue Tierart ist ja inzwischen getaggt.
Langlaeufer (2025-07-08 15:38:30+00:00): Hallo NSchwarz, 
du hast den Radweg zu einem Gehweg mit "Radverkehr frei" korrigiert. 

Ich hab noch ein paar weitere Korrekturen vorgenommen
1) Das gilt auch auf der Brücke.
2) Dieser Weg ist somit kein Radweg sondern ein Gehweg, d.h. für die Fahrbahn cylceway:both=no
siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren

3) weil er in der gleichen Ausprägung nach Norden  weitergeht hab ich ihn verlängert.

Grüße und weiterhin frohes mappen
Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168622190
Langlaeufer (2025-07-08 15:38:55+00:00): Hallo NSchwarz, 
du hast den Radweg zu einem Gehweg mit "Radverkehr frei" korrigiert. 

Ich hab noch ein paar weitere Korrekturen vorgenommen
1) Das gilt auch auf der Brücke.
2) Dieser Weg ist somit kein Radweg sondern ein Gehweg, d.h. für die Fahrbahn cylceway:both=no
siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren

3) weil er in der gleichen Ausprägung nach Norden  weitergeht hab ich ihn verlängert.

Grüße und weiterhin frohes mappen
Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168622190
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-29 03:54:27+00:00): Removed promotional and SEO spam tags and cleaned up others in changeset 183332074

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332074
GPYes (2025-07-07 20:18:30+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery
domi_nick (2025-07-14 07:30:03+00:00): Czy aby na pewno na całym odcinku tor powinien być oznaczony jako disused? Prace prowadzone są bliżej dawnego PDTu a po drodze przy al. Prymasa mamy Zakład Energetyki Trakcyjnej i Torów, który na 99% nie został na 3 tygodnie odcięty od sieci
pwbriggs (2025-07-09 07:08:21+00:00): Oops, looks like you accidentally moved a node in a road, I didn't catch that earlier. Reverting that node change. Thanks!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168679902
felipeeugenio (2025-07-07 22:01:57+00:00): Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones. Al ojo esas calles se ven todas asfaltadas. Está seguro que son de concreto?

saludos
Luisma_ (2025-07-08 19:26:36+00:00): Hola, ahora que reviso mejor, tienes razón y he marcado algunas calles de asfalto como concreto. Pero hay algunos casos en donde la calle tiene tramos de concreto y otros de asfalto, en esos casos como se determina?
Gracias por la anotación.
felipeeugenio (2025-07-08 20:22:58+00:00): Hola. Cómo se determina? conociendo el lugar supongo. En las fotos satelitales se notan cuando son de asfalto o de concreto, pero no siempre, y ante la duda usamos "paved", que es el genérico.

Ahora, si efectivamente hay partes de una superficie y otras de otra se pueden separar y agregar las distintas superficies, pero creo que eso ya no se puede hacer con street complete. Se tendría que hacer con un editor web en un PC.

Pero dale con eso mientras. No hay problemas. Supongo que se pueden cambiar de concreto a asfalto en Street complete, si no lo hago yo. Me avisas.

saludos
user_5359 (2025-07-08 14:33:40+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/617216222. Which language code (ISO 639) did you mean with name:Pashto?
Maple_ (2025-07-09 17:02:06+00:00): Hello, thanks for reaching out. I had intended to add the tag as “name:ps”, but instead added the full language name. I have updated the tag with the correct syntax. Have a nice day!
yelisey90 (2026-01-13 17:10:35+00:00): reverted: mass changes using not on-the-ground checking, but some undetermined sources, possibly simply aerial imagery; including incorrect surface tagging (asphalt instead of unpaved or sett), incorrect addresses to buildings etc.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177188720
Leo Slager (2025-07-09 10:32:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
SafwatHalaby (2025-07-13 17:44:07+00:00): Hello, and thank you for your building additions to Daliat el Carmel.

It appears that you're not creating buildings with right angles. Please note that pressing Q will create 90 degrees angles and this is usually desired.

Second, it seems you're accidentally snapping some building points to important polygons, For example, node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12987033942 touched the landuse polygon
SafwatHalaby (2025-07-16 10:44:54+00:00): Please be advised that you're not using the most up to date aerial maps. ESRI World imagery is more up to date than Bing maps in this town. For example, have a look here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413123757#map=19/32.698005/35.034738&layers=N

If you switch to ESRI, you'll notice you've missed quite a few recent buildings. This is particularly visible on the outskirts of both Isfiya and Daliat el carmel, where there's rapid residential houses growth
SafwatHalaby (2025-07-16 10:54:18+00:00): Again, I'd like to thank you for the initiative! The buildings here have been out of date for quite a while. 

In summary, please consider these notes:

1. Right angles with Q
2. Use ESRI World Imagery rather than bing
3. Avoid snapping buildings to polygons
SafwatHalaby (2025-07-16 11:02:08+00:00): Another critical important point: Please do not move streets or buildings just because they are misaligned with the aerial. The aerial itself is misaligned. For example, see this street: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/77355996

You've moved it slightly south, but the previous position is a lot more accurate. You can tell this by enabling the GPS Trace layer in the id editor.

You should align your aerial maps to the GPS traces, this should be done whenever you move substantially to a new area (Since this is a mountainous region, aligning properly for one place will move another place out of alignment)

Info on alignment here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_aerial_imagery
silversurfer83 (2025-07-08 18:36:49+00:00): Hi

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht.

Meine Meinung: Wenn du dir mit den Brücken und Durchlässen sicher bist sieht das gut aus :)

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168623844
os-emmer (2025-07-15 20:08:49+00:00): Hello Ibis1999 and welcome to OSM!
You added species:wikidata=rosier to this object:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12986513102
wikidata tags schould only contain wikidata-IDs. That are these numbers with a "Q" in front of them. Could you check your edit? Thanks.
ivanbranco (2025-07-23 16:58:12+00:00): Also keep in mind that the standard separator is the dot, not the comma. So "height=1.6" instead of "height=1,6"

thanks and good mapping!
SD Mapman (2025-07-09 15:23:23+00:00): Why were the name tags removed? They are part of the address for the road and signed as such.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-07-09 16:56:11+00:00): Because "County Road x" (where x is a number) is a highway designation, not an actual name. Sometimes, the county routes have an actual name tagged in their "alt_name," which I used as their actual name.
Jrachi (2025-07-08 09:04:17+00:00): Ciao.
E Benvenuta nella mappa più bella del mondo!
Ti ringrazio per avere iniziato a contribuire.
Ma devo chiederti se sei sicura di alcune modifiche che hai fatto:
1) in tre relazioni hai sostituito
source=survey:CAI 
con
source:CAI
Hai modificato un'informazione standardizzata il cui significato è "verifica effettuata da uno o più soci del Club Alpino Italiano, tramite un sopralluogo"
La tua modifica è fuori standadr e non verrebbe nemmeno interpretata.
Ricordati che il 99,9 % dei dati OSM vengono letti e interpretati da una macchina e più le informazioni sono standardizzate e migliori sono i risultati.
2) distance corretto da 10.1 a 10.10
Mi devi spiegare cosa significa.

Buone mappature.

Ivo
Giulia Siemoni (2025-07-21 21:49:49+00:00): Salve Ivo, e grazie per le segnalazioni; errori miei, perdonami. Provvedo a correggere.

Giulia
Martin Chovanec (2025-11-30 19:41:39+00:00): kudos to this person who was brave to explore and mapped the surroundings of the mysterious Kruševački potok railway stop in Montenegro!
Radiat47 (2025-11-30 19:54:52+00:00): To be honest, it was a pleasure to explore it as this train stop is simply legendary :-D And while doing it, we met there an elderly railway worker using the path regularly to get home from his job. So it was a perfect Balcan story.

Zdraví
Radek Barvíř
German C (2025-12-05 12:38:28+00:00): Hola Lolj, ¿por qué eliminaste los 7 bloques de edificios? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=168624882 (en rojo esta resaltado lo que eliminaste)
jake-low (2025-07-08 21:09:40+00:00): Hi DwightTee, thanks for improving the map of this campground! I reviewed your edits and they look good. One suggestion: in the future, instead of using the "name" field to describe the type of building (in this case a barn), you can use the building=barn tag and omit the name (unless the barn really has one). I fixed these for you already but just something to keep in mind for the future. Here's some guidelines for names in OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168625858
Taya_S (2025-07-08 05:49:10+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168631991
fs_LT (2025-07-28 06:44:16+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168626012
Goudanius (2025-07-29 00:33:31+00:00): I don't really understand: why is it reviewed bad? What should I have done different? Would be good to know for the future :)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168626012
Goudanius (2025-07-29 00:44:39+00:00): ah I see, the edits are too far apart from eachother. Yes, I get it!
Glassman (2025-07-09 02:00:10+00:00): #TIP: when a business closes, remove the business tags but leave the address, it is likely to be reused.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168626114
Taya_S (2025-07-08 05:49:11+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168631991
DaveF (2025-07-08 12:13:22+00:00): Hi
There is already a railway station tag.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/860241027#map=19/51.924333/-2.067219
samon53 (2025-07-08 21:11:33+00:00): It still needed the buildings added as railway station buildings, I've created a Transit Stop Relation and added everything in now.
DaveF (2025-07-09 14:44:03+00:00): Thanks for correcting my typo.
jake-low (2025-07-08 21:13:57+00:00): Hi DwightTee, thanks for your contributions! I've reviewed your edits and for the most part they look good. A couple of suggestions:
- The "name" tag should be used only for the actual name of the trail, and not as a description. The name "Horses only trail" is probably better expressed using the tags "horse=designated" (and "foot=no", "bicycle=no" etc if these modes of travel are not allowed). The real name of the trail can then go in the "name" field (rather than alt_name as you've done here).
- You can use highway=bridleway rather than highway=path if you wish; it is meant specifically for trails meant primarily or exclusively for equestrian use.
Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168627615