piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-29 21:32:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13181003891

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2025-09-29 16:54:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-03 13:04:15+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/172790641
literan (2025-09-29 19:22:35+00:00): только не надо каждое отделение делать отдельной больницей. Один объект на местности - один объект в базе
orphanas (2025-09-30 07:36:30+00:00): Доброе утро. Понимаю сложность ситуации, но всё же считаю, всё же, что это необходимо оставить по следующему ряду причин:
1) В этой больнице (на этой территории) находятся только часть филиалов из всей сети, поэтому стоит указать, какие именно филиалы находятся на этой территории 
2) Допустим, приехав в эту больницу человек даже не будет знать в каком корпусе находится приёмное отделение, чтобы не тратить время на поиски, что может быть важно при ситуациях угрожающих жизни. На данный момент случаются ситуации, когда скорая отказывается везти пациента куда-либо из-за недостаточной симптоматики поставленного заболевания
3) Как я ранее упомянул - это всего часть филиалов данного госпиталя, так что вполне логично, что у каждого корпуса своё назначение, свой сайт (можно проверить по Яндекс картам) и свой номер телефона в части случаев. В угрожающей жизни ситуации это также может сыграть не на руку оказанию медицинской помощи. Если зайти на сайт, там список корпусов под разные "разделы" медицинских услуг куда шире, чем может показаться, не считая, само собой того, что филиалы там есть и другие, у них свои домены, услуги и корпуса. Если мы прогнозируем ситуацию с отсутствием сетевого подключения, то разобраться в этом всём практически нереально без подобных точек на карте
literan (2025-09-30 20:28:51+00:00): я не удалял точки. Я лишь убрал с них теги больниц, так как это не больницы, и поставил теги healthcare=department
orphanas (2025-09-30 20:38:05+00:00): Прошу прощения, не понял. учту в будущем, спасибо
user_5359 (2025-09-29 19:04:38+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1434131431. This way have only one key name and no description about the type of this way!
user_5359 (2025-10-05 08:51:05+00:00): I remove this way.
eggie (2025-09-29 17:33:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-15 08:24:13+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302955832/history has highway = 1 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
eggie (2025-09-29 17:38:47+00:00): Dag Tom   .. Ik zie hier aan het eind een parkeerplaats, maar geen doorgaande toegangsweg voor autoverkeer.
Wellicht wel een highway=path?
De andere toegangsweg zal niet routeren, want die staat op access=private  'Moet' dat wellicht permissive zijn. Dan zal het wel routeren voor wandelaars en fietsers.

MVG
eggie
Tom van Rijn (2025-09-29 17:45:16+00:00): Goedenavond Eggie,

Mijn prioriteit was om te laten zien dat er wel degelijk een verbinding is tussen deze twee wegen waar je als fietser en voetganger tussendoor kan. Ik heb dezelfde type lijn gekozen als die er naast stond. Maar je hebt gelijk dat je met de auto er niet tussendoor komt. Wat dat betreft is een andere type lijn zoals een voetpad of fietspad wellicht accurater.

Groeten,
Tom
eggie (2025-09-29 17:49:43+00:00): Oke Tom,
Ik had de changeset nog open dus ik heb er nu een path van gemaakt met foot en bicycle=yes
Die andere toegangsweg heb ik op permissive gezet. het zal nu routeren.
Mapse,
eggie
eggie (2025-09-29 17:59:57+00:00): CTRL-F5 voor het effect
Tom van Rijn (2025-09-29 18:04:27+00:00): Bedankt voor het aanbrengen van de correcte lijn
NeisBot (2025-09-29 17:36:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-03 13:03:51+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/172625097
Patchanka (2025-09-30 16:29:46+00:00): bonjour
merci pour les mises à jour.
Attention à ne pas supprimer des objets (ex : les voies, sauf si elles n'existent plus bien sûr), il vaut mieux les mettre à jour ainsi on garde l'historique.
bonne carto

PS : je vous ai envoyé quelques infos de base + infos sur le groupe local
watmildon (2026-01-18 07:20:23+00:00): Hello! Thanks for all the additions. 

I can probably save you some time. The farmland for these pivot irritation fields can be drawn as full circles and don't need the cutout for the track road. Honestly, The path into the center seems to move around on various imagery... I'm not saying don't add it but it's not a super stable feature.

At any rate, feel free to add irrication=pivot if you want to add a bit of tagging depth to these.

Happy mapping!
barkerid (2026-01-18 16:06:11+00:00): Chuckle.  Yea, I have a friend in Illinois who was into these, and I was sort of 'on board' in following his lead for a while.  But, lately, I only put them in if they look really significant on multiple imagery and look like they are used year after year - rather than just 'this year's access road'.
watmildon (2026-01-19 01:53:04+00:00): I love a giant circle so there are a bit of a pet feature of mine. Plus all the pac-man ones!
i2004 (2025-09-30 15:55:11+00:00): me podiras ayudar con la 178
Bondi Maps (2025-09-30 16:00:23+00:00): Aún no investigué a fondo la 178 como para mapearla. En algún momento lo haré, por ahora mi prioridad es Hurlingham, CABA, Tres de Febrero, Merlo, Ituza y Morón

Son muchas líneas y mapearlas todas es complicado
i2004 (2025-09-30 16:00:53+00:00): ok
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-24 16:57:56+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173727540
Fraxi (2025-09-29 18:15:19+00:00): Използвани и Bing Streetside снимки.
Zrop (2025-09-29 20:10:21+00:00): Hallo Mark510,
Du hast hier öffentliche Straßen, verkehrsberuhigter Bereich, auf "access=private" geändert. Wie sind die Straßen vor Ort ausgeschildert ?

Gruß
Zrop
Merna_mahmoud (2025-10-01 08:34:46+00:00): Hello Sandalss,
Thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap in Oman.
I noticed you added a tag (ref=D320) for some streets.
Here are examples of those roads:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/284159717
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/746786029
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506500593
It is not compatible according to our latest document
https://mjla.gov.om/decisions/ar/1071/show/1188
Do you have any sources confirming that? If you do, please share those sources with me.
Regards,
Merna_mahmoud
Robert Whittaker (2026-01-07 18:13:32+00:00): Hi Philip,

Could you check exactly what you've done in this changeset? It looks to me as if you may have added postcodes to quite a few non-addressable objects, which don't actually have addresses or postcodes. More-over if they did have postcodes, some of the ones you've added aren't correct.

I assume this is because you're adding postcodes assigned to each URPN in the ONS data. But the allocation of postcodes in the ONS data is not that straightforward. If the UPRN has an address then that postcode is used. But if it doesn't, then the nearest postcode is allocated instead. I don't think we want to add these "nearest postcodes for non-address objects" to OSM, not least because they're sometimes wrong.

In particular could you have a look at the objects with postcodes SO45 1TX, SO45 1DP and SO45 1FY.

* https://overpass-turbo.eu/?w=%22addr:postcode%22=%22SO45%201TX%22+global&R
* https://overpass-turbo.eu/?w=%22addr:postcode%22=%22SO45%201DP%22+global&R
* https://overpass-turbo.eu/?w=%22addr:postcode%22=%22SO45%201FY%22+global&R

From https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/pc-stats/SO/SO45/1/#1FY and https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/uprn/SO45-1DP and https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/uprn/SO45-1FY you can see that the first of these is probably the postcode for the whole oil refinery, while the latter two are postcodes for properties in nearby streets. The latter two shouldn't be assigned to anything in the oil refinery.

A useful flag to be more careful when adding postcodes would be if there are more than 100 UPRNs with a given postcode - since Royal Mail rules mean there's never more than 100 properties within each postcode unit.

Best wishes,

Robert.

PS: In the source tag, it would probably be better to use either osn_uprn_directory or ons_uprn_lookup (to be more specific) for the postcodes and os_open_uprn if you've used that too.
philipcullen (2026-01-09 19:01:45+00:00): Hi Robert,

Thank you for the helpful tips (and very helpful website) - I'll look to incorporate them to my process in the near future.

I've revised the area and changed the type of some buildings, so it should now be more as expected.

Phil
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-24 16:57:02+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173727499
Jarek 🚲 (2025-10-09 00:51:55+00:00): I see that you have undone the change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5313955962 -- thank you -- but just a request to remember to check OSM history when imagery doesn't match what's tagged, to see if the tagged value is from survey -- especially when imagery suggests a worse level of infra than what's tagged.
VLD322 (2025-10-09 17:50:37+00:00): Thank you for reaching out to me. I appreciate the positive contributions you have made in this area. If I recall correctly, this was one of my first interactions with your edits. Upon reviewing the quality of your other work, I revisited this and made the necessary corrections. I sincerely value your recommendation with regards to OSM history and I will keep this in mind for future edits. Wishing you a good day.
Glassman (2025-10-02 02:03:17+00:00): If you are interested in adding sidewalks, our Pedestrian Working Group has created a schema guide. I thought you might be interested with all of the sidewalks you added. Can you look at the street crossings? they should be tagged as highway=footway + footway=crossing. There are additional tags for marked crossings. 

Let me know if you have any questions or would like to be more involved mapping pedestrian ways.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172627497
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-10-01 09:31:48+00:00): Merhaba. Bu değişikliği deneme amaçlı mı yaptınız? Yoksa gerçekten ağaçlar mı kesildi? Adres bilgilerini de silmişsiniz. Yanlışlıkla sildiyseniz değişiklikleriniz geri alabilirim.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-10-12 23:46:10+00:00): Cevap yazmadığınız için değişikliğinizi geri aldım. Değişikliğiniz deneme amaçlı değil gerçek ise buradan cevap yazarak belirtebilirsiniz.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173202742
JJIglesias (2025-09-30 00:25:19+00:00): Saludos. No se le pone "nombre" a una edificación a menos que tal edificación tenga un nombre real ("Edificio Quintanilla" por ejemplo). Si colocas la etiqueta building=house, NO DEBES colocar name=casa.

Ya hemos corregido esos errores en tu edición. Te sugiero leas estas partes de la wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

Gracias
limes11 (2025-09-29 21:05:26+00:00): Hi, 

I doubt this classifies as "name". Note that your source is a private webpage of a blogger, nothing official.

Best
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2025-09-30 20:39:43+00:00): You are right. I removed it.
aharvey (2025-11-11 12:41:54+00:00): we don't use addr:city it doesn't form part of the address. We use addr:suburb which would be Ironbark but we don't generally tag addr:suburb or addr:postcode since these are all derived from the admin boundary https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3079197#map=17/-36.755106/144.263760
dmjab13 (2025-10-01 15:15:40+00:00): there are no bridges between the southside paths around trout creek. the path is completely separated and not accessible without traveling through the creek
felfeldolme (2025-09-29 19:27:47+00:00): اسمش مهران بود که در کامیت قبلی اشتباه کردم اینجا اصلاح کردم
mueschel (2025-10-04 16:55:30+00:00): Hi,
could you check these two ways? They got a strange "ref:" tag.
notmyproblem1 (2025-10-01 11:36:27+00:00): If the parking lot is for resident, access=private, if the parking lot doesn't exist you delete like this
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 06:05:38+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9180852221/history has shop = boutique that was added in this edit
shop=boutique? Is it shop selling clothes? Then maybe shop=clothes would fit well, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=clothes

Or maybe shop=fashion_accessories ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=fashion_accessories ) would fit better? Or shop=bag ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=bag ) ?

Or is it some completely different type of shop, with tag used as "boutique" is French word for shop? In such case see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for some documented values.

For shop=boutique info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=boutique page
YomanNH (2025-10-01 13:02:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1434164164
Ta ścieżka rzeczywiście czterokrotnie przecina to ogrodzenie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175158190 ?
Tomasz Pastusiak (2025-10-01 13:06:42+00:00): Ups, do poprawy. Mapowałem z wyłączonym widokiem na inne obiekty niż drogi.
Tomasz Pastusiak (2025-10-02 20:40:40+00:00): Zmodyfikowałem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172765506
Chociaż zastanawiam sie czy to ogrodzenie nie jest do przesunięcia bo oryginalnie odrysowałem zgodnie ze śladem GPS, a on jest raczej dość dokładny. No ale to osobny temat.
Dawid2849 (2025-10-03 10:33:59+00:00): Według BDOT500 ogrodzenie powinno być wręcz jeszcze minimalnie bardziej na południe. 
Link do warstwy (w wyborze warstw w iD trzeba kliknąć "Własne"): https://integracja.gugik.gov.pl/cgi-bin/KrajowaIntegracjaBazDanychObiektowTopograficznych?BBOX={bbox}&CRS={proj}&FORMAT=image/jpeg&HEIGHT={height}&LAYERS=bdot&REQUEST=GetMap&SERVICE=WMS&STYLES=&VERSION=1.3.0&WIDTH={width}
vng_me (2025-09-29 20:54:33+00:00): More "ucap"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/483856021
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/483856041
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-29 20:52:00+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5560247207
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289920204

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-29 21:32:10+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5560247207
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289920204

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
divulmappeur (2025-09-29 20:18:46+00:00): Source: https://www.corsematin.com/article/societe/1171070723057215/ajaccio-le-teleporte-angelo-sera-mis-en-service-le-18-octobre
Smajser (2025-11-18 17:52:00+00:00): Address of these POIs is not "Omladinskih brigada 88".
Can you please double check it?

Best regards
NeisBot (2025-09-29 20:33:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-03 13:02:09+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/172790566
NeisBot (2025-09-29 20:47:02+00:00): Hallo FFOhlendorf, herzlich willkommen und vielen Dank für deine Mitarbeit 

Um die Zusammenarbeit zu erleichtern und anderen dabei zu helfen, deine Änderungen zu verstehen, ist es am besten, eine kurze Beschreibung der von dir vorgenommenen Änderungen hinzuzufügen. Klar formulierte Kommentare helfen der Gemeinschaft dabei, deiner Arbeit zu folgen und bessere Rückmeldungen zu geben. Hier[1] findest du Tipps zum Schreiben guter Kommentare.

Basierend auf deinen Karteneditierungen in diesem Changeset habe ich einen Vorschlag dafür erstellt, wie ein Kommentar aussehen könnte: "Geometrie eines Knotens angepasst"
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi FFOhlendorf, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Adjusted geometry of a node"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Eren00 (2025-09-29 20:51:30+00:00): Lütfen bilmediğiniz yeri isim etiketi olarak eklemeyin. Yaptığınız hatayı düzelttim: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172632001
pavvv (2025-09-29 21:14:58+00:00): Jak pytałem na Discordzie, to opinie były takie, że to jest plac. Jeżeli to nie plac, to powinno być area:highway=pedestrian.
maro21 (2025-10-01 12:14:11+00:00): Mnie jest obojętnie, czy będzie oznaczone jako plac czy nie. Moja edycja dotyczyła tylko nazwy, która jest zdublowana i wyświetla się w miejscu gdzie biegnie Ofiar Oświęcimskich.

Świdnicka to ulica we Wrocławiu, więc nie jest placem.
pavvv (2025-10-01 13:04:41+00:00): Nazwa nie implikuje od razu, że coś jest placem lub nie. To, że nie jest placem oznacza, że nie zasługuje na place=square, ale highway=pedestrian+area=yes wciąż może być. I przy tym uważam, że nazwa może być prawidłowa. Jeden obiekt jest od nazwy ulicy, a drugi od nazwy placu, a to czy to jest plac czy nie, zależy od tego, jak wygląda sytuacja w terenie. Usuwanie nazwy tylko z powodu, że wyświetla się nad nazwą innej ulicy to tagowanie pod render.
silversurfer83 (2025-10-01 20:22:48+00:00): Hello there :)

you asked for review, so here comes feedback:

I don't believe, that "city block" is the right tagging in a small dwelling like that. Also, those "blocks" shouldn't overlap.

Buildings can be squared using the "Q" key.

Please keep it local. Upload your changes before moving to another place.

check wiki.osm.org

any questions: please reach out. We help :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172632109
user_5359 (2025-09-30 06:48:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. 
If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at 
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurveillance
MarcoR (2025-09-30 10:20:10+00:00): Grazie AnonimoA per la tua modifica, però occhio che in Italia i civici andrebbero assegnati all'ingresso (dove sta la mattonella) e non all'edificio 
Per maggiori informazioni vedi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses#Numero_civico

Buon mapping,
Marco
aceman444 (2025-10-06 08:09:58+00:00): Znovu, aj socha aj schranka? Chapem, ze mozno socha svateho v schranke, ale v takejto kombinacii som to este nevidel. Hlavne ked to place_of_worship=shrine nema definovany vyznam. Vy ste vymysleli to znacku? Tak ju zdokumentujte.

A to chodite po celej Dunajskej Luznej a hladate tie schranky? Lebo mnohe ste pridali ako prvy, dakujeme.
Nick Xia (2026-07-07 04:42:30+00:00): Hi, a 3.5T restrcition was put on the Tourere Rd, can you please provide some info to support this restrcition?
Robert Ancell (2026-07-09 02:13:31+00:00): That was added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146537260 - I don't know if it is valid.
BCNorwich (2025-10-07 05:21:33+00:00): Many warnings above
Syl (2025-09-30 09:10:44+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez ajouté les mêmes numéros deux fois. Ça concerne aussi d'autres groupes de modification, je ne sais pas à quel point le problème est étendu.
rm69 (2025-09-30 15:50:01+00:00): merci de m'avoir alerté sur ce problème, que j'ai déjà observé sur d'autres intégrations et corrigé à plusieurs reprises. Il faut être vigilant et contrôler systématiquement les résultats a posteriori
NeisBot (2025-09-29 21:18:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-03 13:01:09+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/172633244
notmyproblem1 (2025-10-01 11:34:37+00:00): Tutto l'edificio è una casa vacanza?
CASA CAROLINA (2025-10-02 08:05:35+00:00): No, il piano terra con ingresso indipendente!
user_5359 (2025-09-30 06:41:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/4160006319 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
LordGarySugar (2025-11-04 16:20:43+00:00): Hi, just to let you know I have updated/removed some of the tags you added at Al Makhtoum Airport - you should only use aeroway=runway, aeroway=terminal and building=* tags once the airport is actually complete and ready for operations. I've changed them to use lifecycle prefixes like proposed:aeroway=runway and construction:building=airport_terminal
MaliMrav (2025-10-05 15:40:46+00:00): Hi km2bp,

May I ask you to properly capitalize all names?

Please fix:  КУЛТУРНИ ЦЕНТАР ВОЈВОДИНЕ 66 „МИЛОШ ЦРЊАНСКИ" (13181756337)

Please see detailed instructions in this changeset comment:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164224314