piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rivermont (2026-02-06 14:54:40+00:00): Fixed; I wish OSMAnd had a better POI editor
Ewen Hill (2026-02-14 03:33:49+00:00): Hi, This appears not to be a track at the southern end, appears to be through private land and may even have a gate at the southern road end.  This appears not to be accessible to the public. Can you please verify other than using vicmap data as a lot of old and decommissioned tracks still remain in this database.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178076066
Nisha NHVR (2026-02-15 22:19:54+00:00): Hi Ewen,
Thank you for reviewing. 
Will check and make necessary changes.
eggie (2026-02-04 08:20:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
FajrAl (2026-06-14 13:59:10+00:00): Perubahan pada changeset berikut menunjukkan alasan mengapa batas administrasi tidak dianjurkan untuk berbagi geometri dengan fitur lain dan sebaiknya dibuat sebagai geometri tersendiri: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184095403
Frans S (2026-02-11 11:31:25+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings
D: Connecting nodes to other features.
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.

Don't add a layer to a building to hide an error. just adjust the mapping.
Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178076693
渤海西岸 (2026-02-04 06:58:58+00:00): 已经没有交大铁路社区了，而且南操场社区应标在德贤公馆，车站街社区应该在南新道南、车站路西、风井东路东这一带，石庄社区在风井路和交大北街交叉口东北一带，这三个社区都是因为拆迁居委会搬走了，地名不要跟着政府动，参考北京和盘锦
Darnight14 (2026-02-04 11:27:49+00:00): 交大铁路社区撤销有没有信源？关于拆迁的问题我以后会把地名放在原址。
渤海西岸 (2026-02-04 12:21:04+00:00): 在百度上搜“唐山 交大铁路社区”或“永红桥 铁路社区”没有相关信息新闻，在路南区官网搜“交大铁路社区”也没有相关条目和新闻，百度百科里面：1981年永红桥街道辖25个社区，2011年辖10个社区，2021年辖九个社区，1南操场2石庄3富庄东里4建国里5建国楼6富民楼7南富庄8增盛楼9车站街。所以基本可以确定已经没有了
Glassman (2026-02-05 03:19:24+00:00): Is this a new. From the latest imagery, it looks like the old structures were demolished. Someone added a bldg, but it's 6 years old. But if it's correct, you can merge your node with the building outline. Of the bldg is gone, it should be removed from OSM. (Select the outline then delete it.)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178076901
aighes (2026-02-04 23:20:47+00:00): Hey ratrun,
I can see you deleted a couple of ways, which were added just 2 days ago by a fellow mapper based on GPX tracks. Have you been there within the last days and can provide any more recent sources why you think those ways are not existent?

Otherwise I kindly ask you to restore those ways. Have a nice day.
ratrun (2026-02-05 03:49:17+00:00): If you look closely you will see that I only deleted ways which for some reason were overlapping/duplicated.
fluffycupcakes (2026-02-04 06:20:51+00:00): Hello. I sent you the aerial imagery sources to check out in our previous discussion. I advise not to spend so much time drawing features that are most likely outdated for now
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:33:18+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13523364214 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Marine Centre"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-12 05:55:02+00:00): ❌ Text fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178140445
Glassman (2026-02-05 03:21:13+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

FYI, there is an app, DeFlock which makes it easy to added these surveillance devices.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178077675
Jr family (2026-02-05 03:53:00+00:00): Thanks! Just pitching my grain of rice into the pile. 

I’ll download the app asap! 

Warm regards.
silversurfer83 (2026-02-04 08:18:34+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap :)

thank you for contributing your time to this database. 

As you are new it is absolutely normal that you don't know everything there is to know about OSM so I'd like to give you a couple of hints on how to be better :)

- here you added a couple of names that sound like businesses. It would be much better if each were to get their own node with all appropriate info (just like the gym you added).

- earlier you created buildings. You can make those that have square corners in reality look much better by hitting "Q" after you assigned the object type.

- if there are any questions regarding OSM please reach out and check the wiki at wiki.osm.org

real people can be found at c.osm.org in the interantional signal group or on slack

happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178077787
Warin61 (2026-02-04 08:43:15+00:00): Thais and 2 past changesets part Reverted.
Leave the National Park Boundary alone.
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:32:01+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1474062454 v1 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/149048980 v2 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1619057038 v2
https://osm.org/node/1620824239 v2
https://osm.org/node/1619057040 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178078145
NeisReview (2026-02-12 05:05:10+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178126783
Frans S (2026-02-11 11:27:57+00:00): Please be more accurate when you map buildings.
They are not always just a rectangular building. Follow the rooflines more precise.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178078328
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-08 20:09:34+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13523459694/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this edit
Would it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )
Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house )

Something else?
yelisey90 (2026-02-04 08:57:37+00:00): Hi! What kind of barrier is this? Maybe, if you describe it in words, I will be able to help choosing the right tags. Because the way it is mapped now, without type or access tags, it won't be shown anywhere and will have no effect on routing, either on cars or on foot.
dmlls (2026-02-09 15:48:56+00:00): Hola, esto no es un https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=books sino un https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=games.

Un saludo,
Diego
Frans S (2026-02-11 11:25:55+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped them. 
You tend to oversize the buildings. Stay within the rooflines !

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178079718
Frans S (2026-02-11 11:24:42+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
A remark. Don't connect nodes of buildings to other buildings or features and roads.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178080132
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-06 01:51:34+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13523516263

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
TrickyFoxy (2026-03-14 06:54:42+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179840813
Buraddo (2026-02-04 16:51:31+00:00): Salut,
Este deschisă Pasarela Blașcovici-Strada Gării? Știu că anul trecut a fost scandal că au închis-o fără a oferi alternativă, STPT a introdus linia 5B ca să ofere o legătură.

Când am trecut prin zonă părea că era închisă cu plasă de sârmă. 

Am greșit ștergând-o?
AlexTopoRO (2026-02-04 19:05:57+00:00): Salut, scuze nu am luat in calcul ca nu e deschisa pentru circulat. Stiu doar ca am trecut pe langa luna trecuta si inca era intacta cel putin pe partea cu superimposer, nu eram la curent cu starea ei. Verific chiar maine cum sta situatia ca trec prin zona, revin atunci cu raspuns!
multimob (2026-02-04 13:23:57+00:00): Fixed by changeset 178094840
Warin61 (2026-02-04 08:45:49+00:00): This and 2 previous changesets partly reverted to maintain the National Park boundary. 
Leave the National Park boundary alone.
user_23564325 (2026-02-04 09:38:33+00:00): With what information are you determining the national park boundary?
TheSwavu (2026-02-04 23:04:24+00:00): https://datasets.seed.nsw.gov.au/dataset/nsw-national-parks-and-wildlife-service-npws-estate3f9e7
user_23564325 (2026-02-05 09:24:24+00:00): Ok cool, my apologies for stuffing up the boundary and appreciate the advice. I am new to osm.
Warin61 (2026-02-05 10:43:12+00:00): You can do with a little help?

Multipolygon relations are about the hardest thing. Some boundaries can be seen in the DCS Base Map. Most (all?) have been entered using downloaded data. Your best leaving these alone though some accidents do happen (humans do this). 
If you have questions .. ask. The answers may not happen fast but they will come.

Oh I spotted some track tht you had entered .. is t was close to making a connection to another track but missed. I connected it . While these look fine on a map routers will see the gap and not route across it. If I see it again I'll let you know so you can see it for yourself..
user_23564325 (2026-02-07 05:01:12+00:00): I see. That is some great advice. I really appreciate your help and thankyou for your patience. 🙂 I am really finding it interesting contributing to osm and i want to be as accurate as possible. Would you say the boundary is now fixed or did i mess it up abit? and When correcting the boundary do you use bing aerial image also or just DCS Base Map?
Warin61 (2026-02-08 07:52:51+00:00): Where I got the boundary from this time? From the past chageset that entered the data .. and that got it from DCS (except it was some other name back then) data base down load. Back then a number of use got all the National Parks, State Forests and other things and got them into OSM. This is less work and less prone to error than tracing them out from the Base Map. 
Form Imagery I prefer the DCS Imagery - more locationally accurate than Bing. And for more upto date Imagery Esri. 

I have not checked the boundary lately.
user_23564325 (2026-02-08 08:39:42+00:00): Ok thats fair. In my recent edit i have taken the waters edge of woy woy bay and waterfall bay back to the original edge using the DCS Base Map and have left the National park boundary to what was reverted. I think this is correct now?
K12230LF (2026-07-15 23:17:48+00:00): Pour info, si tu retombes sur une note, c'est bien Semard sans accent :) J'ai eu cette note qui m'a indiqué qu'il n'y avait pas d'accent : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5356358 et effectivement dans Wikipedia il n'y en a pas. Et tu as dû avoir une note en sens inverse :)
kuhni74 (2026-02-04 09:01:44+00:00): danke!
Dimacn (2026-02-06 04:33:47+00:00): Здравствуйте. Внутренние проезды (обычно не сквозные и неименные) рекомендуется обозначать как service. Вот здесь подробно - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification   В вашем случае это дорога https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1474087973
kuhni74 (2026-02-04 09:00:41+00:00): danke!
felipeeugenio (2026-02-04 12:04:51+00:00): Hola. Puedes cuadrar los edificios con la letra Q. Aqui se notan que están a mano alzada. Gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178082866
felipeeugenio (2026-02-04 12:05:40+00:00): Además, por favor usar el tag de building= para estructuras, no para recintos completos. Hay varios que marcaste que incluyen patios y elementos que no son estructuras. Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178082866
felipeeugenio (2026-02-04 12:06:25+00:00): Y por último, por favor no agrupar edificios. En varios casos lo hiciste bien, pero en otros se nota que las estructuras son diferentes, pero sin embargo, las aglomeraste en una sola.

Saludos y gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178082866
eggie (2026-02-04 08:22:17+00:00): Beste Peter,

Schuiven met de kaart in editmodus  levert vaak grote schade op. Hier dus ook. 
Houd het gebied van je edits klein.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=178082938
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-04 08:26:00+00:00): reverted by changeset #178083332
Je hoeft geen emergency=yes toe te voegen aan reguliere wegen. Dat is default.
Je had adressen verplaatst en wegen verschoven.
Waarom een plaatsnaam aan weilanden toevoegen?
Wat was je bedoeling?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-04 11:45:18+00:00): Burg Prinslaan zou gewoon moeten routeren van oost naar west. 
Net haperde Valhallah,
maar nu doet ie het weer.

Geen idee wat er loos was.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_car&route=52.039195%2C5.676831%3B52.039188%2C5.671327#map=18/52.039015/5.674074&layers=N
emergency=yes is hier niet nodig.
Gr eggie
Yepoleb (2026-05-23 23:39:38+00:00): Find ich sehr cool, dass du Eingänge erfasst, Danke!
Frans S (2026-02-11 11:21:49+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping. Often oversized.
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.

Quality prevails above quantity
Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178083489
Frans S (2026-02-04 09:38:49+00:00): Thanks for mapping. Accurately mapped.
Just a remark on this mapping
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1474094177/history#map=19/12.105208/15.122364
You mapped both a building. tree and courtyard as 1 building. Check the Mapbox imagery to see what I mean.
I adjusted it.
Best regards and keep mapping
arjunaraoc (2026-02-17 00:31:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check whether https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dplayground  is a more suitable tag.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178083743
CjMalone (2026-03-05 17:04:39+00:00): Was this intentional? I can't see it on Esri.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1474096525

If it was, it should probably be highway=service. If it wasn't, it should be removed.
infeeeee (2026-02-05 22:00:02+00:00): Szia!

A note=* címke más szerkesztőknek szóló információk tárolására szolgál. Ilyen infó, ami a térkép használóinak is fontos lehet inkább a description=* mezőben tároljuk.

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség#Elérhetőségek

További jó térképezést!
qstep (2026-02-06 09:14:36+00:00): Illetve az USB port megadható így: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socket:*#:~:text=device%3AUSB%2DA
AgusQui (2026-03-06 03:58:39+00:00): Que aburrido debes estar para ponerte a mal dibujar veredas en lugares que ni cerca estuviste de conocer...
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-06 02:22:46+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9915290104

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-06 02:22:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187012528

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SmartGeoPl (2026-02-06 07:29:05+00:00): adres jest z https://dalikow.e-mapa.net/

usunąłem addr:place
Dzięki
mavl (2026-02-06 15:20:40+00:00): Здравствуйте. Названия улиц указывают полностью. Например, "Янтарная улица".  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1051454944  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-04-10 09:32:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 181135570 where the changeset comment is: Reverting alleged locksmith scam businesses.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/allegedly-fake-locksmiths/142942
Taya_S (2026-02-12 12:42:39+00:00): Reverted data imported from Google

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178456174
Taya_S (2026-02-12 12:42:40+00:00): Reverted data imported from Google

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178456174
NeisBot (2026-02-05 06:13:53+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13523785789 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "مساج مركز"
---
على سبيل المثال ، يمكن أن تكون نسخة أكثر محايدة ومنصفة من نصك هي: "مساج مركز"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
hans spa (2026-02-05 08:28:43+00:00): مركز متخصص في المساج العلاجي والرياضي والاسترخائي بالرياض، يجمع بين اللمسة الإندونيسية الأصيلة وخبرة مختصين محترفين يقدمون جلسات مخصصة لكل حالة. نوفر مساج للظهر والرقبة والكتف، جلسات استشفاء عضلي بعد التمارين، ومساج استرخاء يساعد على إزالة التوتر وتحسين الدورة الدموية. يُعرف هانز سبا بجودة الخدمة، نظافة المكان، واحترافية الفريق الذي يركز على راحة العميل وعلاجه بطرق علمية آمنة.
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-05 08:50:13+00:00): Hallo,

es bringt meiner persönlichen Meinung nach nichts, die Spammy-SEO Beschreibung hier als Kommentar nochmal zu posten.

Danke und Grüße
Pascal
hans spa (2026-02-05 08:57:28+00:00): مركز مساج متخصص
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-05 09:01:28+00:00): Bitte ändern Sie die Beschreibung in Ihren Eintrag (der erstellten Node): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13523785789

Hier in diesem Bereich können Sie nur Texte als Diskussion und Hinweise hinterlassen. Ihr erstellter Eintrag des Spa's wird dadurch nicht angepasst.

Hoffe das hilft Ihnen weiter.

Grüße
Pascal
hans spa (2026-02-05 09:06:13+00:00): هل تم نشر النشاط التجاري؟
او مطلوب مني ان اضيف بيانات اخرى
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-05 09:07:59+00:00): Sie finden Ihren Eintrag hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13523785789

Ja, er ist veröffentlicht und sollte von Ihnen noch angepasst werden. Sollte dies nicht in den kommenden Tagen passieren, wird er wohl gelöscht werden ...
syncronic (2026-02-22 20:08:20+00:00): Die Info, dass man hier rübergehen kann ist durchaus wertvoll, denn die Alternativen sind unangenehm. Wenn keine Wegspur zu finden ist, kann das viele Gründe haben.
Timo Herker (2026-02-23 04:46:34+00:00): Ja, das stimmt schon.
Aber wenn offensichtlich kein Pfad da ist, stimmt es nunmal nicht.
LG
syncronic (2026-02-23 10:13:53+00:00): Da gehen Leute, sieht man auf Strava, Spuren sieht man auch auf den Luftbildern. Ich bin da auch mal langgelaufen. Es bildet sich halt keine krasse Spur aus, weil es etwas beliebig ist, wo man auf der Wiese geht. Ich vermute, dass sich die Spur etwas verlegt hat wegen der Leitplanken an der B2
DodoGTA (2026-02-21 16:17:48+00:00): Here's the wiki page for this change: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/DodoGTA/Cyclestreet_in_Lithuania (not sure if it's needed though)
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-28 08:46:18+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13523851022/history has addr:housename = 02 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here - was it supposed to be addr:housenumber= ?
Akrimullah (2026-05-29 10:48:15+00:00): it looks like the editor try to add address information about neighborhood number code in Indonesia which is RT 06/ RW 02, it suppose to be in a full address. not a house number.
Akrimullah (2026-05-29 10:50:08+00:00): it could be something like this:
addr:neighbourhood = RT 06/ RW 02