piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
HellMap (2023-12-21 17:33:35+00:00): I asked the community at https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/358602-general/topic/Salaspils.20.C5.ABdensteka although we don't have that many mappers in Latvia, so it might not get many answers.
StreamMaps (2023-12-21 17:43:14+00:00): Great, unfortunately we don't have many mappers in latvia but it's great to have other mappers in this region so it's easier to verify and double check information, btw i have some images of the river and some old maps witch are revelent but idk how to send them
habi (2024-01-12 09:06:36+00:00): Ciao tmeller
Da `review_requested=yes` hier mein Senf dazu.
Sind die Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232759309/ und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232759309/ schon fertig gebaut und der Volg und Bauhaus schon drin?
Dann würde ich die Gebäude nicht als 'construction' erfassen.
Ich habe die Umrisse der Gebäude an die Bing-Luftbilder angepasst, da diese die Gebäude im Rohbau zeigen.
Ä Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi
tmeller (2024-01-15 15:16:05+00:00): Hallo Habi, danke fuer Dein Feedback.
Bauhaus ist noch im alten Gebaeude, doch ist der Schriftzug bereits als Relief im Eingangsbereich fertig. Der Einzelpunkt ist noch als 'closed' gekennzeichnet. Die Attribute vom alten Haus nehme ich erst rueber, wenn der Umzug erfolgt ist. Bis jetzt ist der Bau noch nicht ganz abgeschlossen.
Danke fuer die Korrekturen, meins war freihand.
kapazao (2023-12-20 20:28:01+00:00): Hola Juanmi, las direcciones no deberían añadirse en los edificios, estas son de números de puerta. Para estos casos si no vas a añadir las puertas, en su lugar puedes añadir en el edificio un nodo con solo la dirección cercano a la zona de la calle y luego en su momento se trasladaría a la puerta.
Puedes ver ejemplos en esta zona de Atarfe https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/37.21890/-3.68591
Podría ser que un edificio tenga varias direcciones y así evitamos ese problema. Siempre hay que comprobar las direcciones a pie de calle y no se deben añadir solo copiando de Catastro, ya que este también tiene errores.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145344590
kapazao (2023-12-20 20:31:01+00:00): Por otra parte solo es necesario añadir la vía y el número de puerta. No es necesario el código postal y la población, ya que esto se puede determinar por los límites administrativos.
Para el tema de códigos postales también se pueden añadir límites. No sé si Motril tiene varios, si fuera solo uno este se añadiría al límite de Motril y ya todos los elementos en su interior se entiende tienen ese código postal y nos evitamos repeticiones innecesarias.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:postal_code
Un saludo
TrickyFoxy (2023-12-24 16:27:40+00:00): Не заносите в осм личные заметки https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11435701591
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145344872
literan (2023-12-22 16:58:41+00:00): криво пишете адрес. Удалю.
4004 (2023-12-26 20:11:51+00:00): Добрый день, спасибо за правку.
а Макей разве не владеет большей частью здания, под производство?
4004 (2023-12-26 20:11:57+00:00): https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/507939543
basilisk (2023-12-26 20:24:19+00:00): Приветствую!
Если честно, то про владельца здания я не в курсе. Но даже если и Макей, то это в любом случае не shop=leather
4004 (2023-12-26 20:36:47+00:00): да, шоп это уже рокетдата навесили, сейчас верну фабрику
basilisk (2023-12-27 14:52:52+00:00): новый вариант нмного лучше, спасибо!

а у рокетдата, да, часто с автоматизированными правками странное происходит. постоянно им пишу.
4004 (2023-12-27 22:32:01+00:00): Обычно они прислушиваются к комментариям, тут я видимо не уследил
Danny B Braaten (2023-12-20 20:28:24+00:00): Nice
citrula (2023-12-21 15:55:57+00:00): 'Welcome to OSM! This is not the place for personal, unverifiable information like this. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145376463
VictorIE (2023-12-21 09:17:49+00:00): Hi,

This way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232764334 has only a single node.

I would have deleted it, but noticed that there are some very complicated boundaries.
eggie (2023-12-21 09:42:34+00:00): Dag Stollie.. Je vraagt feedback.. Lijkt me oke zo.
MVG
eggie
hoserab (2023-12-20 22:57:52+00:00): Added what things?

I see you made changes to the proposed interchange at Stoney Trail and 11 St NE in Calgary, changing the tagging from `highway=proposed` to `highway=construction`, which indicates that the road is currently being built. I can with 100% certainty tell you that that's completely untrue.

As per my comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145340785: what are your sources? You're making some changes, particularly in the Calgary area, that are demonstrably untrue.
TrickyFoxy (2023-12-24 16:26:02+00:00): Откуда данные? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232772147
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232772151
NieWnen (2025-06-22 00:03:15+00:00): Dość stara zmiana, ale jak coś to tagujemy `proposed:amenity=*`, a nie `amenity=proposed`. 
Ogólnie warto wrzucać niemal wszystkie tagi z tym prefiksem np. `proposed:parking=street_side`.

W zasadzie, to dla _proposed_ niemal wszystko jest mapowane prefiksami cyklu życia. Wyjątek stanowią tutaj głównie tagi `highway`/`railway`.

Dla `construction` do wyjątków dolicza się jeszcze `landuse` i `building` i możliwe, że coś mi jeszcze umknęło :)
Sylabowy Kot (2025-06-22 11:20:27+00:00): Nie siedziałem wtedy jeszcze w JOSM, to nie byłem do końca nauczony jak mapować i robiłem takie bezsensowne głupstwa, jak te chodniki, które poczekają kilka lat na realizację :) Dzisiaj takich rzeczy nie robię, ale dzięki za informacje.
eggie (2023-12-20 21:51:35+00:00): Dag Milan   Je plakt de weg aan de landuse=residential van Amsterveen. Dat is niet de bedoeling.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145347380
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-12-20 21:55:10+00:00): De bebouwde kom ligt weer los van de wegen.
Wanneer je editgebied zo groot lijkt is er iets vreemds aan de hand. 
Groet
eggie
Geo-Tobi (2024-03-16 20:03:13+00:00): Der neue Radweg wurde mit traffic_sign 240 eingetragen, aber dann mit hw=cycleway getagt. Das ist nicht korrekt.
Wegeschlenzer (2024-03-16 21:47:42+00:00): Hi Geo-Tobi,
hast recht, gemeinsame Geh- und Radwege müssen mit hw=path eingetragen werden.
Danke für den Hinweis!
Wegeschlenzer
dadavid (2024-05-07 16:02:53+00:00): Hi SG86, 

wenn ich deine Bearbeitungen hier [1] richtig verstehe, ist das Hotel zum Erprinzen geschlossen worden. Ich würde also vorschlagen, aus dem amenity=hotel eine disused:amenity=hotel zu machen [2]. Magst du diese Änderung machen? :) 

Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß beim mappen :) 

David



[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/329369048/history

[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix
yrtimiD (2023-12-21 20:34:07+00:00): Hello, correct me if I'm wrong, but your version of the "Nathan Elbaz / Dasha Ahronson" junction is absolutely overcomplicated and doesn't represent actual roads.
zstadler (2023-12-22 07:43:16+00:00): שלום
Sokuya

תודה על תרומתך למיפוי ב
OSM!

בעריכה זו נראה שהוספת מספר נתיבי פניה 
בצומת של שני רחובות דו-מסלוליים

האופן שבו ממפים צמתים כאלו ב
OSM
מתואר בדף הוויקי
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Junctions#Dual_carriageway_intersections
ואינו כולל את 4 נתיבי הפניות שמאלה בצומת.

אני יכול לתקן את זה, או להשאיר לך את התיקון, לבחירתך

בברכה,
זאב
Sokuya (2023-12-31 20:06:37+00:00): Hello, I fix it according to wiki, and added turn:lanes parameters. Thank you for pointing this out. I will pay attention forward. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145745551#map=17/32.16122/34.83231&layers=D
yrtimiD (2024-01-01 12:02:52+00:00): Thanks!
Natan Elbaz is one way now?
Sokuya (2024-01-01 21:31:06+00:00): No. its two way street. My bad, merger get wrong. I fixed it now. thanks for pointing this out. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145776489
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-22 17:33:00+00:00): Hello!

You used
kerb=no -
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11280438868/history

Have you maybe meant
kerb=no
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
IMAN SELEMAN (2023-12-20 21:51:45+00:00): i apploaded the wrong changeset coment, how do i reverse?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-20 22:00:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10572804471
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10572804469
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232780913
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232780914

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
diamondarmorsteve (2024-08-16 12:54:19+00:00): Hi, I have un-deleted the hamlet for Two Buttes. Please see my changeset comment

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155326480
mvexel (2024-08-18 21:35:10+00:00): Fair enough. Thank you!
KoiAndBlueBird (2023-12-21 14:44:27+00:00): Hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313506020) dasselbe Problem wie im anderen Changeset.
emersonveenstra (2023-12-22 18:33:01+00:00): Hi there,

I've fixed this for you, but you created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232797452/history which broke routing because there was no highway tag on it. Please be careful in the future to avoid these mistakes!
emersonveenstra (2023-12-26 13:12:57+00:00): This one is broken as well: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232797450

Can you please fix it?
VLD302 (2024-01-03 21:12:43+00:00): Thank you for your comment and making the fix. I will keep a better eye on these cases next time. I have also fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232797450 via this changeset  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145854821. 

Thank you,
VLD302
emersonveenstra (2024-01-04 16:44:28+00:00): Great, thanks so much!
mueschel (2023-12-24 09:21:22+00:00): Hi,
could you point me to the documentation and discussion of this massive retagging of tens of thousands of traffic signs in Spain?
yopaseopor (2023-12-24 09:40:05+00:00): Yes sure,you can find it in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Extended_traffic_signs_tagging
and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign

Human readable values are the most used in OSM as taginfo says so we need other tag when we want to maintain also the national id of the traffic sign. I have found the answer in taginfo,with a few items and used it.
mueschel (2023-12-24 09:47:19+00:00): That's a 6 year old abandoned proposal that has never been discussed or voted on. 

A huge edit like this that replaces a well established tag needs to be discussed and agreed on between all the users of the tag - currently almost 30,000 traffic signs in Spain are lost to any application that follows the documented way of tagging. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign
Minh Nguyen (2023-12-28 18:33:07+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/large-scale-change-of-traffic-sign-to-traffic-sign-id/107508
Marek-M (2023-12-21 08:10:18+00:00): Cześć, czy chodniki w tej okolicy nie mają połączenia z innymi chodnikami lub z ulicami? Nie łącząc dróg i chodników ze sobą psujesz routing. Naprawisz to? Dzięki.

https://i.imgur.com/tXuQ2ZG.png
Marek-M (2023-12-21 08:11:40+00:00): PS: iD ostrzegało Ciebie o tych problemach przy próbie wysłania edycji:
resolved:almost_junction:highway-highway=7
warnings:almost_junction:highway-highway=2
warnings:disconnected_way:highway=1
Necessarycoot72 (2023-12-20 23:18:06+00:00): Please don't map what's not on the ground. If you want to start mapping, read the wiki. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145349490
Necessarycoot72 (2023-12-20 23:20:53+00:00): Please don't add personal or wrong information, to the map.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145349490
totera (2023-12-21 14:23:53+00:00): Ciao niubii,
1) la telecamera non è più lì, è stata spostata lo scorso marzo
2) non è un autovelox, è un tutor
3) il limite di velocità è 70 km/h e non 50
4) il tutto era già correttamente mappato: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15620243
niubii (2023-12-21 15:33:57+00:00): Ciao
Grazie per la segnalazione.
Puoi effettuare un revert?
totera (2023-12-21 23:50:12+00:00): Ho fatto il revert (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145388713)
Goffredo (2023-12-21 10:38:16+00:00): Ciao, se permetti due piccole note:
- i percorsi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1226241967#map=19/45.54266/10.22478 e https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116534499#map=18/45.54249/10.22507 non devono avere nodi in comune perché il secondo (116534499) passa sotto al primo (1226241967)
- Il percorso 116534499 ha delle parti inclinate, vero, ma non in tutta la sua lunghezza dunque IMHO il tag incline=up non andrebbe applicato a tutta la way ma solo ai due tratti che sono inclinati

Ciao e buon mapping :-)
smorz (2023-12-21 10:54:30+00:00): Ciao, grazie mille dei suggerimenti, stavo cercando di sistemare degli issue che mi sono comparsi su osmose. Ho fatto un revert del changeset.
eggie (2023-12-21 07:20:23+00:00): Dag Marc,

Zo te zien liggen de routerelatiedelen nog netjes op volgorde,
MVG
eggie
TheBestIdea (2023-12-27 02:02:22+00:00): Did you see my Mapillary imagery?
KoiAndBlueBird (2023-12-21 14:35:14+00:00): Servus,

bitte nicht die Adresse zu einer Straße hinzufuegen (wie z.B.  hier geschehen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086489757 ), sondern einen Node machen und sie dort hinzufuegen, bzw. das Gebaeude direkt damit versehen. Siehe auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr:*#Wie_kartieren?
Javierpf (2023-12-21 13:46:27+00:00): Hola Vicente. Veo que le quitaste  el tag de construction al 2da circunvalacion.
No estuvo bien quitarle el tag. 
Cuando la highway es construction hay que indicar que es lo qué tipo de ruta se está construyendo.
te dejo un link de la wiki con breve explicacion al respecto
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dconstruction
vicente lopez 2021 (2023-12-21 14:16:40+00:00): yo trate de poner construction para el puente que atraviesa
Javierpf (2023-12-21 14:31:49+00:00): ahi vi el puente y le agregué algun tag
nevw (2023-12-21 02:14:50+00:00): Hi, welcome to osm.
I noticed the first couple of edits and feel you need a bit of help to do it correctly so that other editors don’t have to follow behind you to fix the building shapes.
You are expected to edit/shift the building nodes to reflect the exact shape of the building. The microsoft building footprints are rubbish and only indicate there may be a building shape here - you then need to fix the shape presented to you before upload and you need to zoom in close to see the shape of the building. Thanks.
Enock4seth (2024-08-16 19:49:37+00:00): Hi, when mapping ways ensure they actually connect to other near by ways instead randomly adding multiple isolated ways.
MarcoR (2023-12-23 08:56:29+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Are you sure that part of Viale Gianluigi Bonelli (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59745147) isn't always public accessible?

Happy mapping,
Marco.
KoiAndBlueBird (2023-12-21 02:59:25+00:00): You listed some Texan website with PDFs as source. Are you allowed to use those for OSM? I.e. do they have a free license?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145351654
tyfi (2023-12-21 02:17:43+00:00): I'm no longer un-naming singly-designated segments of highway, so I change the name of those ways from "MO 30" to "State Highway 30".
skorasaurus (2023-12-22 21:13:35+00:00): Thanks for the edits; is the parking garage already built and open to the public?! I haven't been around there in a few months :)
KoiAndBlueBird (2023-12-21 02:53:24+00:00): Looks good so far
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145353092
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-21 08:36:10+00:00): Note that it is not reverting edit that added them, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10153825297/history

(also, there was contact attempt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128584200 )
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-22 02:41:09+00:00): Thanks, that one now also reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145391334
Kovoschiz (2023-12-21 05:58:14+00:00): Please don't delete it directly, as it contains an address. Change it to a plain "point".
VLD549 (2024-03-28 13:02:39+00:00): Hi, could you indicate a source with link where the spelling change from Van Der Vyver Street to Van der Vyver Street is based on?
The majority of the sites I find are with capital D.

Thank you!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-12-31 17:12:02+00:00): essa parece estar mais pra track nao?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232830319
DressyPear4 (2023-12-31 21:21:43+00:00): Pode ser
IgorMagellan (2024-01-17 09:35:55+00:00): Удалены новые домики (building=construction), которые уже с лета под крышей, но на спутниках не видны. Почему-то удалены многие лесные дороги. А 
изменения типа дороги в LU=greenfield, возможно и правильное, с track на service,  вместо изменения тоже тупо удалены. Откат.
eisa01 (2024-06-03 19:01:22+00:00): Revier is the restaurant on the site, so it needs to be two nodes and not in the same name

I fixed it for you :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145357020
Katsiaryna Bazhankova (2024-06-05 07:41:30+00:00): Hello, eisa01! 
Thanks a lot for paing attention to this and your fix. 

Best regards, Katsiaryna :)
empty_child (2023-12-21 10:38:14+00:00): Рита, добрый день
Я боюсь, вы немного с локацией ошиблись
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11436650369
Rita Pikallo (2023-12-21 14:29:33+00:00): Спасибо большое, исправим.
Supaplex (2023-12-22 00:54:13+00:00): 這裡不是大佳河濱公園
這邊才是
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11791159
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145358386
MarcoR (2023-12-22 07:22:14+00:00): Ciao e benvenuta/o su OpenStreetMap!

Occhio che il prefisso telefonico di Padova è 049 e lo zero iniziale non va tolto quando si aggiunge il +39

Buon mapping,

Marco.
Corrini (2023-12-22 08:17:27+00:00): Grazie della segnalazione, Marco. Sfuggito dal copiaincolla. Un saluto.
Marek-M (2023-12-21 08:55:13+00:00): Cześć, Zacna z chodnikiem były prawidłowo połączone. Popsułeś tutaj routing pieszy.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168968992
theDM (2023-12-21 09:22:20+00:00): Cześć. Na Zacnej są chodniki na całej długości po obu stronach, więc trzeba je dodać. Jezdnia nie była prawidłowo poprowadzona.
theDM (2023-12-21 09:27:18+00:00): Dodałem chodnik na całej długości ulicy i teraz routing powinien działać poprawnie.
Supaplex (2023-12-22 03:19:53+00:00): Is there a change of control in this area? Otherwise, you should follow the on the ground principle, and should not change the name of the route, place, or infrutruce

Có sự thay đổi quyền kiểm soát trong lĩnh vực này? Nếu không, bạn nên tuân theo nguyên tắc cơ bản và không được thay đổi tên tuyến đường, địa điểm hoặc vi phạm
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145359348
gendy54 (2023-12-26 21:29:56+00:00): Bonjour,

Pour tout ce qui concerne le tourisme, je vous suggère les vidéos: https://peertube.openstreetmap.fr/c/teritorio_channel/
eggie (2023-12-21 09:34:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Er stond nog een klein stukje bij de rotonde op De Worp. Dat heb ik aangepast.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
silversurfer83 (2023-12-21 13:15:14+00:00): Howdy :)

shouldn't "footways" out in the wild be tagged as "highway=path"? Or are these explicitely signed with VZ 239?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dfootway

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145360086
map per (2023-12-21 17:08:20+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
Joseph R P (2024-02-11 19:46:31+00:00): Hello, there are a few issues here. Belt Road between Centennial Parkway and Speedway Boulevard is still mostly closed to the public and under construction and an overpass along Centennial Parkway crossing the railroad does not exist. Which source did you use to conclude these connections were open?
OrdinaryScarlett (2024-02-12 00:51:46+00:00): I apologize for the incorrect edits. I made some erroneous assumptions about the area as a local. I will be more diligent about relying on sources in the future. Thank you for reverting my erroneous edit.
Joseph R P (2024-02-12 03:02:20+00:00): No worries. I'm an ex-local myself but am still interested in editing in the area so a source I've been relying on a lot lately is the Clark County OpenWeb map (https://maps.clarkcountynv.gov/openweb/). Its aerial imagery and data is updated every 4 months and was updated just this month so it is very useful for verifying construction project statuses in Las Vegas and the metro area.
Echo 5 (2023-12-21 08:55:41+00:00): Aérodrome toujours actif
jj000 (2023-12-23 22:22:19+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/eerder-geblokkeerde-gebruiker-is-weer-actief-gaat-het-nu-goed/6221/160
jj000 (2023-12-24 13:01:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145452128
jj000 (2023-12-24 13:03:03+00:00): Kan je uitleggen waarom je deze weg hebt gesplitst? Dank. Grt Jelle
habi (2023-12-21 09:11:48+00:00): Nein, https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4034980 !
slice0 (2023-12-21 11:31:24+00:00): thankyou
thopf (2023-12-21 12:15:51+00:00): Der Gleis- und Oberleitungsbau im Bereich des Bahnhofes St.Paul im Lavanttal ist auch auf den Durchfahrtsgleisen gänzlich abgeschlossen. Die Gleise sind befahrbar, am Webcambild habe ich schon Testzüge vor einigen Tagen gesehen. Daher ist das ganze Construction-Tagging hier nicht mehr korrekt. Ich werde es wieder rückgängig machen!
Negjana (2023-12-21 12:44:46+00:00): Habs schon geändert. Bitte nichts reverten, da gehen viele Signale verloren.
Emilius123 (2024-08-27 21:27:56+00:00): EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA :(((((((
Claudius Henrichs (2023-12-21 12:18:32+00:00): Hi and thanks for your contributions to improve public transport stations in Barcelona.

I came across your changes on both Plaça de Sants and Plaça Espanya where you created some very large stop area relations for all of the public transport (PT) infrastructure on that location. If the PT infrastructure is a separate location (like metro stations, bus stations) it is preferable to create separate stop areas which are then linked via a stop_area_group relation that contains all of them. You can see an example here for Espanya which contains the metro, GCG and bus stop areas: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5720834

Could you follow this established tagging scheme, please? Here's the related documentation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:public_transport

Let me know if you have any questions.
aleixstw (2023-12-22 00:05:28+00:00): Thank you so much for your feedback, I will fix those issues soon.