piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NicaTopo (2024-06-29 18:14:26+00:00): Steve,

Please stop adding crazy building shapes. Generally 99% of the buildings are SQUARE! You can square them out in the iD editor.

I have to revert you additions.
multimodaal (2025-03-03 18:52:48+00:00): Hi, thanks for editing this nice cycleway! Two  questions: 

1. It looks like you have _replaced_ railway=disused with disused:railway=rail but from the wiki it seems that disused:railway=rail should be _added_ to railway=disused (instead of replacing it) ?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:disused:railway=rail

2. wouldn't "abandoned" be the more appropriate lifecycle  value, since the tracks are removed  ? (otherwise it would be hard cycling there)

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Ddisused 

and my pictures of the cycleway : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1823685241142147

Best regards!
==
Example way history:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39214869/history
SekeRob (2025-03-04 10:59:11+00:00): Hi,

railway=disused/abandoned... hmmm, oh yes, the supplemental disused:railway=rail says it pertains to the rail part. Was recently made aware that lifecycle tags for certain objects/parts are to be placed on a separate tag rather than a prefix... think it was on the community forum so I'll get to that when I'll get to that and checking back had completely forgotten about it, 3 years ago did it right https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108043691

Anyway, In fact, razed is closer to the truth for the sections that have gone under the cycleway paving like most, for sure it will never ever be reinstated as a railway. 

Got the same between Ortona and Vasto (now that is a really really nice cycleroute on the sea border). Dutch will love it as it often gives a nice stiff breeze either going SE or NW blazing over the Adriatic.. put your factor 50 on. Temp differences between sea and land can really amplify that effect.

These rails mostly better to be placed on the OHM site is my opinion, somewhere external to standard OSM.

A mapper complaint recently running a double flat because he tried to cycle on a remaining 1.5km piece where the rock bed was still there but absolutely everything else removed....you need to swap to the SS16 primary and pray while traversing there, heavy lorries racing by, actually now routing there, but recommend to better push bike that stretch along the old track. Don't know the history why that part is not done up. 3m wide cycleway stops dead and then continues 1.5km further on, 3m wide.

Also Sangritana between Lanciano and Casoli and on is thoroughly abandoned, sections truly gone but still tagged as disused. A mapper went about few months ago restoring the level crossings again as were they operational. Some hardware (lights, liftgates, signals is still there in severe dilapidated state and some crossings have no binaries to see, just asphalt... ah yes reminds me of Ortona - Orsogna... in practical terms gone but a few relics and yet still tagged as disused, As said, the local rail aficionados can put their teeth in on those.

Maybe was:railway tag... there's 4K use on TagInfo (no wiki, lots of tag combos), At any rate, I let mostly the rail aficionados worry about that, the local community that is, long as it does not conflict with the rests of the way routing which it did when I made that change, think around the time when I mapped the 3100km Appennino Bike Tour route in 44+1 stages... The 1 having a part actually traveling by rail to the ferry port going to Messina- Sicily. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17814924.
Was a few weeks of work including resolving routing issues. You need some really good legs for sections like Torre to Passo San Leonardo on to Rivisondoli

cheers
multimodaal (2025-03-06 21:52:45+00:00): Hi, thanks for all the work on the Appennino Bike Tour, must be many many hours of mapping!
It has given me a lot of inspiration for future cycling holidays!

For now would you object if I would change the signposted spoleto-norcia route from disused:railway to abandoned:railway (since the rails are removed, but the railway route is still recognisable) and restored the railway-key (but with value abandoned instead of disused) ?

(it was also discussed here:  https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/karte-der-bahntrassenradwege/125706/204 )

Cheers!
SekeRob (2025-03-07 10:36:15+00:00): Yes, please go ahead... on your inspirational tour you might get passed L'Aquila... The eagle. ;o)

ciao
Leo Slager (2024-06-30 12:49:22+00:00): Dag OpDeKaart,

Het pad langs de Beukenlaan was hier correct getagd in drie delen met verschillende bestrating.
Ik zal deze changeset reverten.
gurglypipe (2024-06-29 21:49:07+00:00): Heya. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1214769505 is currently tagged as a detached house (because that’s what it looked like to me on aerial imagery + cadastral parcels). Is it actually a terrace, or an apartment building? Ta
Dezza (2024-06-30 13:13:49+00:00): Hey, it's a detached house that has been converted into three flats (there's a few that have been converted to flats on that road, but it was raining, so didn't make a note of most!).
gurglypipe (2024-06-30 13:17:41+00:00): Makes sense, thanks for the detail :) I’ve amended the tagging in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153368764, let me know if it looks incorrect
Dezza (2024-06-30 13:20:35+00:00): Looks good, thanks :)
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-06-30 20:55:07+00:00): Please don't add fake "motorways' that duplicate roads
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153340565
unemtlmappeuse (2024-06-29 17:29:00+00:00): Merci beaucoup!!!
felipeeugenio (2024-06-29 19:53:56+00:00): Hola. puedes cuadrar los poligonos con la letra Q.

Estos se notan que fueron dibujados a mano
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153342428
Meinew (2024-06-29 18:31:10+00:00): Je ne sais pas à quoi ressemblait le chemin, mais "Impassable" semble trop.
J'imagine que "horrible" ou "very_horrible" serait mieux. 
Je vous laisse comparer avec les photos de la doc : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness
Jrcourtois2 (2024-06-29 18:53:17+00:00): En fait, je pense que le smoothness ne s'applique pas, et que c'était indiqué comme un track, alors que c'est plus un footpath
Meinew (2024-06-29 19:34:33+00:00): J'ai l'impression que votre chemin est tres proche de celui ci : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186835762, qui avait été donné en exemple par ce post : https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/37134/path-via-a-wetland-reedbed
Je vous conseillerais de recopier les attribut appropriés. On notera qu'ils avaient opté pour highway=footway
woodpeck_repair (2024-07-28 09:34:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154512232 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism by tmapsme, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16504
Ilovemap1999 (2024-07-01 02:38:41+00:00): All your edits were duplicated, you should learn a course about the Openstreetmap edit before editing
Hung Tran 9x0 (2024-07-01 17:23:46+00:00): Can you give me a specific example of which one duplicates what?
Ilovemap1999 (2024-07-01 17:47:56+00:00): you add new restrictions already existed: 
17782229, v1
17782230, v1
17782231, v1
'https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15661658/history'
Enovale (2024-07-01 05:54:10+00:00): The source here was actually survey, my mistake.
literan (2024-06-30 10:47:05+00:00): хорошо бы, конечно, поаккуратнее, чтобы заборы, если вы уж решили их нарисовать, совпадали с границами жилых зон

в противном случае все равно потом мне это за вами перерисовывать придется(
LockOnGuy (2024-06-29 22:03:04+00:00): Hello zhiar590, please use good changeset comments as "small fixes" wont help other mappers understand what is your edit.    
Maybe try "small alignment of the road" or like "move the shop slightly  to the correct position" etc. that would help alot.   
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
mavl (2024-06-30 03:42:49+00:00): Здравствуйте. Номер дома указан с ошибкой. Вам уже пытались объяснить ситуацию.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148107462
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-06-30 16:38:31+00:00): Hi, Bvvad

Please note that 
1) Names are not for descriptions. 
2) There is already a description added.
3) Usually, main name should be in a local language.
4) The node type itself already defines what it is (amenity=drinking_water)
5) Родник is natural water exit point to the surface. This is a tap.

I've removed the name you've added.

You can consult the wiki and beginners guide:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide
NeisBot (2024-06-29 19:04:24+00:00): Hi FLOSSBoy, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/node/12020685613

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-01 12:51:43+00:00): Thank you for your mapped beach.
Looks good!

#HappyMapping
bxl-forever (2024-09-12 14:56:55+00:00): Ne pas ajouter les arrêts n'importe comment dans la relation bus, svp.  Il faut toujours veiller à garder les arrêts dans le bon ordre.  Vous avez mis l’arrêt Ten Brielen Christ tout à la fin de la liste, c’est incorrect.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-06-30 14:59:06+00:00): It is legal to cross the street as a pedestrian at Gladstone/Ste-Catherine, even if no official crossing is there. Removing it would force routing detours for pedestrians. Thanks!
eggie (2024-09-01 07:37:53+00:00): ... Nu denk ik genoegzaam bekend. 
Niet aan de BAG omtrekken komen.
MVG
eggie
DaanLT (2024-06-30 06:58:43+00:00): Labas, Lietuvoje vandens telkiniai žymimi taip: https://lt.wikibooks.org/wiki/Atviro_%C5%BEem%C4%97lapio_vadovas/Redagavimas/Plotai
polodo (2024-10-09 06:34:21+00:00): Why did you delete the "Mary Bun" POI? The restaurant is still there.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11731174469/history
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-29 19:37:18+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 153079446, 153080066, 153080257, 153080864, 153080905, 153081086, 153081342, 153081405, 153081470, 153081533, 153084046, 153122430, 153124338, 153221511, 153221631, 153221657, 153328197, 153337606, 153337919, 153338010, 153338162, 153338267, 153338483, 153338594, 153338709.
LockOnGuy (2024-06-29 22:00:12+00:00): Hello Maytham,   
Please use good changeset comment to help other mappers understand your edits, and that will not waste their time trying to understand what is the edit about.    
"Majnoon update" is not clear, Majnoon is the area name and the word update is very vague. Maybe you can try lets say "updated the roads in Majnoon to match sat imagery" or like "updated the xxx in Majnoon area" or maybe "added xxx in Majnoon" etc. and that would be very clear for the mappers to understand the changeset.     
Thank you.     
    
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
LockOnGuy (2024-06-29 21:51:59+00:00): Good.. changeset.. comment..  please..
I asked you many times before. please just help us understand your edits without wasting time.    
See my comment in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153267161
Pisto81 (2024-06-30 11:15:33+00:00): the unconnected nodes with physical tags are unwanted. and when a way ends near another way the end nodes should be merged
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153346864
Supaplex030 (2024-06-30 13:07:03+00:00): @Pisto81: What unconnected nodes are you meaning? Can you give an example, where there is a problem with this changeset?
arafin (2024-06-30 17:50:14+00:00): Thanks for mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153347689
arafin (2024-06-30 17:48:12+00:00): Thanks for mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153347810
Pisto81 (2024-06-30 11:10:32+00:00): there are many individual nodes without any physical tag. And ends of a way near another way should be merged .
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153347862
Black_Diamond (2024-06-30 16:38:40+00:00): Actually some of them were labeled as a crossing me when in fact they are not crossings. Some crossings and sidewalks had to be realigned with aerial imagery. This change is valid.
Black_Diamond (2024-06-30 16:40:14+00:00): I already fixed the accidentally disconnected path in a separate changeset.
Black_Diamond (2024-06-30 16:42:40+00:00): The accidental disconnection is fixed with this changeset. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153357297#map=17/37.30781/-121.98635&layers=N
aceman444 (2024-07-17 15:44:44+00:00): Zda sa mi, ze to dnes otvorili.
mapko (2024-07-17 19:05:46+00:00): Dnes som nestihal skor. Ano otvorili ju... tak uz aj v OSM je.
aceman444 (2024-07-17 20:08:32+00:00): Super, dakujem.
arafin (2024-06-30 17:47:45+00:00): Thanks for mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153348194
AndersAndersson (2024-06-30 07:37:45+00:00): Hej!
Är det verkligen broar? Tittar jag på flygbilder ser det ut som att bäckarna rinner i kulvertar under vägen.
Men jag har inte varit på plats.
treboral (2024-07-04 20:36:20+00:00): Ja mycket riktigt det är kulvertar. Jag ändrar. Jag cyklar i området och stör mig på att ruttplanerare för cykel som t ex Strava inte ruttar rätt i området.
grzegorz75jan (2024-07-01 08:25:46+00:00): Dzięki za dłubnięcie i za Marcinkę tyż 153350511 :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153348457
B_KSL (2024-07-01 14:33:41+00:00): Chętnie dłubnę czasem jak się komuś przeoczy.
CRCulver (2024-08-25 09:41:32+00:00): English uses title case for street names, so "Abdi bobo street" should have been instead "Abdi Bobo Street". Please fix this error in all of the name:en tags you have created for streets in Uzbekistan.
FUZZY_42 (2024-08-25 10:02:26+00:00): I don't have a special bot for this procedure.
CRCulver (2024-08-25 17:08:18+00:00): You can do an Overpass API query for name:en tags in areas you have mapped.
desertivy (2024-07-03 00:39:07+00:00): firstlly, you never responded to this discussion:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153268529
is it because I called out your hypocrisy, or because I exposed your sock puppet accounts?

secondly, you have zero local knowledge of this area to to try to "correct ",, you didn't even know this district existed till I added it to the map here:
www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143161777
your only source for this change is an account that is 99.99% another sock puppet account of yours ,that removed the real name of the area which is "الحسينية" and added this fake misleading node here:
www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147522853

why is this a sock puppet account of yours?
1- has a throwaway IP addresse/email.
2- uses JOSM plugin to revert, which is too advanced for a "new user".
3- has made 3 changes all modifying things i added.

there is absolutely no area with that name in the district except the district itself, this changeset is reverted. and you"ll be reverted every time you re-add this node or remove the  node with the real name of the area.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153480487
LockOnGuy (2024-07-05 10:05:52+00:00): First of all, you should reply with respect and watch your language. I already saw your Telegram message that was full of cussing, profanity, and even contained gender-based insults, including saying "naughty effeminate" in a very hurtful way.

Secondly, I already replied in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153538001 yesterday, so you cannot use this changeset, claiming that I did not reply to you when you were disrespectful in the comment, as something you can rely on to continue your vandalism.
arafin (2024-06-30 17:46:51+00:00): Thanks for mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153348988
gzin (2024-06-30 19:14:40+00:00): Welcome, thank you for reviewing.
Cayenne17 (2024-08-25 09:01:48+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour tes contributions à OpenStreetMap.

Pour cartographier la présence de points d'eau dans les toilettes, au lieu de créer un nœud à part, tu peux directement mettre le Tag drinking_water=yes sur le polygone du bâtiment des toilettes.


voir la page wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity=toilets


Si tu as des questions et que tu souhaites échanger avec d'autres contributeurs, tu as des canaux de communication.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Canaux_de_contact
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-29 22:31:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9386573929
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345276914

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
arafin (2024-06-30 17:46:18+00:00): thanks for your contribution. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153349703
Adam Dunn (2024-06-30 14:51:05+00:00): Hello, it looks like you've made some sharp angles in Silver Creek and accidentally connected it to the roadway.
Also, is there really a tunnel connecting Hall Road to Tenth Line, going under Silver Creek? I can't seem to find a news article about such a major construction project taking place. Do you have any reference or photos?
Thank you
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-29 22:50:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2896195589
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331761198

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-08-04 22:39:05+00:00): naprawione
Hufkratzer (2024-06-30 19:48:07+00:00): Hi,
boah; was für ein riesiges Toilettenhäuschen!
Na ja, also wenn du bei einem Gebäude angeben willst. dass da u.a. eine Toilette drin ist, solltest du toiöets=yes hinzufügen und nicht amenity=toilets, denn letzteres bedeutet, dass das ganze Gebäude ein Toilettenhäuschen ist; siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:toilets
Kiernan2904 (2024-07-01 06:59:44+00:00): Hallo!
Ich habe mich hier angemeldet,  weil ich die Toilette in unserem Verein eintragen wollte. 
Nun finde ich das nicht mal wieder, wo ich das ändern kann 🤔
Kannst du das für mich ändern?

Lg Anja
Hufkratzer (2024-07-01 14:10:13+00:00): Das ist schwierig weil ich nicht durchblicke, wo die Toilette(n) sein soll(en).

Was du geändert hast, kannst du in https://osmdiscussiontracker.com/changeset/153349940 sehen wenn du runtersrollst. Du hast
1. den Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12021278233 hinzugefügt; ist da ein kleines Toilettenhäuschen unter den Bäumen?
2. amenity=toilets an das Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475033464/history getaggt, womit du es zu einem riesigen Toilettenhäuschen gemacht hast.
arafin (2024-06-30 17:44:59+00:00): thanks for your mapping . #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153349954
Pisto81 (2024-06-30 10:46:15+00:00): there are some mixed type duplicated nodes and individual single nodes without any physical tag which make no sense.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153350022
j numminen (2024-07-01 10:03:19+00:00): Would you mind identifying the nodes you talk about and clarifying what the "mixed types" are as well?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153350022
Brummelwuff (2024-06-30 05:56:41+00:00): Ist ja auch durch vehicle=destination auch für Autos freigegeben. 
motor_vehicle=permissive ist hier falsch.
RaHoni (2024-06-30 06:09:02+00:00): O tut mir Leid die Änderung war schon länger bei mir im zwischenspeicher. Deswegen weiß ich jetzt nicht mehr was da drin stand als ich das gemacht hatte. Aber danke für die Info muss ich das wieder Rückgängig machen oder kann meine Änderung einfach abgelehnt werden?
Brummelwuff (2024-06-30 10:42:03+00:00): Moin, ja kein problem. 
Ich kann das für dich Rückgänig machen.
RaHoni (2024-06-30 16:58:57+00:00): Danke das wäre sehr nett
Udarian (2024-06-30 20:05:52+00:00): Next time can you please leave a change set comment that better describes what you did in the commit. For more information see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
TeroToc (2024-06-30 23:32:07+00:00): No, sorry.
Udarian (2024-07-02 00:55:51+00:00): It is still best practice to leave a commit message describing what was done in the commit for other contributors to better understand what was done at a glance and since all of these publicly available and is essentially a VCS of its own so the same reasons having good commit messages in those contexts also apply here. It stands that “.” Isn’t a good change set comment so I would really recommend that you take a good look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments and in the future leave better change set comments as it has been recommended to you in the passed, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15322.
TeroToc (2024-07-02 13:08:14+00:00): Sorry, I'm not going to do that.
Allison P (2024-07-02 20:23:15+00:00): Then when asked to explain your edits, you should do so without fail. What did you do in this changeset? ("Look at it" is not a sufficient explanation.)
Udarian (2024-07-02 21:48:05+00:00): He added some service roads, tracks, fences and farm auxiliary buildings.
Udarian (2024-07-02 21:54:29+00:00): And personally I don’t think that just being there to explain his change sets is good enough, he really should add good change set comments since it allows for easier collaboration along with allowing other contributors that work on improving the map in Miami dade to get a good idea of what was done in the commit at a glance, OSM is a community effort after all, we must all do our best to work together and good change set comments in my opinion are an important pillar of that.
TeroToc (2024-07-02 22:43:16+00:00): I completely disagree with the need for changeset comments. They communicate nothing that can't be far more effectively communicated by just looking at the edit.

If I were making a large, complex, or controversial change, I would add a comment to explain it. When I am just tracing things from aerial photos, a comment is, at best, completely pointless.