piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Edelsalami (2023-03-26 11:42:52+00:00): Die "hässlichen weißen Flecken" gehören da hin, weil das so korrekt gemappt ist. Das, was Sie da vorher verbrochen haben, ist falsch und destruktiv, weil es die Arbeit von anderen Bearbeitern zerstört. Haben Sie sich schonmal gefragt, warum die Geometrien so sind bevor Sie zu Werke gegangen sind? Anscheinend haben Sie Spaß daran Punkte auf der Karte zusammen zu ziehe - das hilft aber niemanden und zerstört die Datengrundlage. Ich habe also lediglich Ihre Fehler korrigiert.
Jbieber (2023-11-16 19:34:06+00:00): Deposit cash not possible
starsep (2023-03-26 22:07:51+00:00): Żart został wycofany
user_5359 (2023-04-01 09:41:40+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/196797848. What is the meaning of the tags
LANES.TAXI = 09:00-18:00
lanes:taxi = backward?
Did you mean lanes:taxi:conditional ? (for more information see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overview_of_conditional_access_proposals)
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-25 17:23:26+00:00): note that such images are not worth adding under image tag as they are not kept forever

see https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/9302
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-25 17:26:49+00:00): But while image lasts: I changed tag to barrier=cycle_barrier as it seems a better match (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier=cycle%20barrier )
MxxCon (2023-03-29 19:37:14+00:00): Hello.
I didn't see this edit when I left the other comment. Thank you for fixing this.👍
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134110656
matheusgomesms (2023-03-29 19:44:04+00:00): Hi MxxCon,

Yes, Organic Maps is causing this issue, which they are already aware of, but didn't solve yet.

Thanks for your comments!

Best,
Matheus
Hufkratzer (2023-03-26 22:20:52+00:00): Hi,
warumm hast du denn an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204045392 das building=yes entfernt? Auf den Luftbildern sieht es aus wie ein Gebäude.
nurdafur (2023-03-27 04:45:16+00:00): Habe ich doch gar nicht. 
Das Tag ist immer noch dort.
Hufkratzer (2023-03-27 10:32:30+00:00): Stimmt. Entschuldigung.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-25 17:00:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/389040787

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
GilB (2023-03-25 19:55:18+00:00): Pour les niveaux, tu pourrais ajouter les tags min_level et max_level au POI que j'ai créé pour la bibliothèque. C'est lié à la cartographie "indoor" et cela me parait adapté ici.
Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Simple_Indoor_Tagging#B%C3%A2timent
(et pour ce type de signalement tu peux utilise le tag "note" ou "fixme" sur l'objet modifié pour indiquer aux autres contributeurs·trices qu'il faut intervenir ou apporter des améliorations ;-)
wkdgs (2023-03-27 12:45:16+00:00): Hallo,

erstmal willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und Danke, dass du dabei hilfst die Karte zu verbessern.

Auch private Wege können in OSM eingetragen werden. Insbesondere die Wege, die zu einem Hauseingang führen, sind für die Karte relevant. Eine Zugangsbeschränkung kann zusätzlich eingetragen werden, um zu verdeutlichen, dass es sich um einen privaten Weg handelt. Diese Einschränkung ("access=private") war auch vorher an dem Weg eingetragen.

Ich habe deine Änderungen daher wieder rückgängig gemacht.

Gruß
wkdgs
wkdgs (2023-03-27 12:46:28+00:00): Anscheinend war sogar schon jemand anders schneller im Rückgängig machen.
ToniE (2023-04-02 11:38:03+00:00): Hi,

da gibt es noch eine Bus Route, die Einbahnstraßen in der falschen Richtung nutzt

See https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/NW/DE-NW-WT-Analysis.html#bus_T37

Gruß
Toni
Ropino (2023-04-02 11:59:08+00:00): Hi,
Danke für die Info.
Ich habe es korrigiert.
VG Ropino
syntex (2023-03-25 18:09:17+00:00): Szlaban zniknął?
Rogoyski (2023-03-26 11:27:33+00:00): Nie zniknął. Rozumowanie było takie, że skoro żadnego innego szlabanu na tym przejeździe/przejściu przez tory nie było zaznaczonego, to dlaczego ten? Wychodzących z peronu tak samo dotyczą punkty railway=crossing jak idących wzdłuż Baletowej, gdzie osobnych lift_gate nie ma (i nie w ogóle nie widywałem rogatek na przejazdach osobno oznaczonych jako lift_gate).

Ale jeśli widzisz potrzebę, to przepraszam, mogę przywrócić.
StefanHRT (2023-03-25 17:18:08+00:00): Foto https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/stefanhrt?lat=52.432997526014&lng=13.55538187105&z=17&focus=photo&menu=true&panos=true&pKey=5974405015974868
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-25 17:20:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7324672843
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10761529839

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
seewäldler (2023-03-26 18:49:20+00:00): Hallo HeadAsylum432!

Warum glaubst du ist die jetzige Stelle besser für den Punkt der Stadt Friedrichshafen?
seewäldler (2023-03-27 12:18:43+00:00): Wenn ich einen Mittelpunkt für die Stadt FN angeben sollte, dann genau unterhalb dem Balkon von dem der Seehase spricht.
user_18794293 (2023-03-29 11:00:21+00:00): The Kirchplatz is more central
seewäldler (2023-03-29 12:00:04+00:00): Nein, das ist falsch. Warst du jemals in FN? Der zentrale Platz ist schon immer der Adenauerplatz, unterhalb der Rathausbalkons (Tipp: Seehase!), vor dem Rathauseingang, mit dem Markt, Weihnachtsmarkt und dem zentralen Brunnen. Darum revertiere ich die Änderung jetzt in changeset 134260148
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-25 17:30:20+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157233823

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Dodko (2023-04-26 11:50:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3659053
gscholz (2023-03-26 05:43:05+00:00): Hi 13_20,
this changeset has created several errors inthe OSm database regaarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=3.03534&lat=41.96272&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=134112208

I have just reverted it to fix those issues. Please watch out what you are doing.
Guido
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-26 07:48:18+00:00): Reverting changeset.  This should not have been made into a golf hole...  #GolfVandalism
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134112503
seewäldler (2023-03-26 10:20:56+00:00): Hallo HeadAsylum432!

Im wiki heisst es für für "city": 
""...bildet normalerweise die Hauptstadt eines Staates (Bundes)landes, Kreises oder einer Provinz ab...""

Bregenz ist die Landeshauptstadt von Vorarlberg. Warum sollte dann "city" nicht passen?
user_18794293 (2023-03-26 14:15:59+00:00): Dornbirn ist größer als Bregenz.
seewäldler (2023-03-26 15:28:07+00:00): Hallo HeadAsylum432!

Das Wiki spricht bei "city" von der Haupstadt des Bundeslandes, das ist Bregenz zweifelsfrei. Die Größe der Stadt hat damit nichts zu tun, genau so ist es auch im Wiki beschrieben, dort steht der Regelfall von 100000 Einwohnern, was auf beide Städte, Bregenz und Dorbbirn nicht zutrifft.
Luzandro (2023-03-27 17:37:24+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/place-city-in-osterreich/97415
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-03 09:17:16+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10761688451/history has shop = cartonage that was added in this edit
shop=cartonage ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
gscholz (2023-03-28 08:35:13+00:00): Hi Antonio Arteaga,
your recnet activities have left behind several broken relations including self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-68.97315&lat=5.33017&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15643946/history

Can you please fix this?

May be you like to educate yourself about how to edit multipolygons properly?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Kind regards
Guido
seewäldler (2023-03-26 10:30:43+00:00): Hallo HeadAsylum432!

Mit diesem changeset hast du Dornbirn von town nach city geändert. Die Beschreibung im Wiki für diese beiden Values spricht mMn doch recht deutlich für town. Warum meinst du ist hier die grössere Kategorie passend?
seewäldler (2023-03-26 15:34:12+00:00): Hier ist es genau andersrum als bei Bregenz, Dornbirn ist weder Haupstadt noch hat es über 100000 Einwohner, damit ist doch town die passende Auszeichnung.
Luzandro (2023-03-26 19:47:18+00:00): Hi,

I've reverted your 2 changesets in Austria. Please don't make changes to major cities without discussing it with the local community. This also applies to official (double) names - I haven't reverted your change to Bergün yet as I'm not familiar with the area, but you literally quoted the wikipedia article where even the link contains the double name "Bergün/Bravuogn", since this is the official name.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/240047745/history
jtracey (2023-04-02 17:03:27+00:00): I reverted a bunch of changesets that interacted with this construction/proposed via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134422424

I tried my best not to damage any of your edits in the process, but you may want to give a quick check to make sure this still looks right to you. Feel free to let me know if I broke anything you'd like me to fix.
hsc666 (2023-03-26 08:30:56+00:00): Hallo Botschafter RLP und herzlich willkommen bei OSM!

Deine Änderungen musste ich leider wieder zurücksetzen, da sie weitgehend fehlerhaft waren. 

Dort liegen z.B. weder Verbundsteine, noch hat sich der Name geändert, die Verkehrsmittel waren schon vorher implizit erlaubt, maxspeed wird in verkehrsberuhigten Bereich nicht verwendet (und schon gar nicht mit nicht-numerischen Werten), Rollen in Routen sind keine Freitextfelder. Bitte sieh Dir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=living_street und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:bicycle und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:surface=sett und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:route usw. (bzw. das Wiki ganz allgemein) an, um weitere Beschädigungen zu vermeiden. 

Bei Fragen kannst Du Dich gern hier oder im Forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56 melden.

VG
hsc666
Botschafter RLP (2023-03-27 08:35:08+00:00): Diese Parkplätze gehören wohl der dort ansässigen Commerzbank und nicht wie ich vermutete der Stadt Limburg.

LG
seewäldler (2023-03-27 12:40:25+00:00): There are both names (Bergün/Bravuogn) on the city limit sign: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=576784766542108

Isn't this the on-the-ground-name to choose?
skyper (2023-03-28 19:15:21+00:00): Yes, in the area where Rhaeto-Romance is spoken many settlements have official names in two languages.

@HeadAsylum432: Please revert all your disputed changes and read the Wiki plus get in touch with the local community. If you have questions start asking other mapper and do not make these disputed or wrong changes.
A good start in editing OSM data is by using ground truth in your neighborhood.
skyper (2023-03-30 11:37:04+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134300366
Senhor PE (2023-03-29 00:50:34+00:00): Amigo se continuar podemos discutir na Justiça o falso mapeamento que está fazendo, você deveria ser bloqueado, pois está levando a erros o usuário. Está aqui a lei que rege os limites dos bairros do nosssso município, sendo que Capivari e Porto Dourado é a mesma região, Capivari seria um bairro que não vingou sendo área sobreposta a Porto Dourado que será o bairro único após regularizaçao fundiária , onde o registro de Capivari será cancelado. A Avenida Jacaráipe tem CEP 29170415 como Porto Dourado, e várias ruas como Acerola, Mangueira, Brauna, Caju e você vem com essa baboseira sem nenhuma comprovação técnica, sem comprovação de causa.
Senhor PE (2023-03-29 00:51:32+00:00): Sobre a Ceturb eles não fazem mapeamento, eles usam o que tá mapeado.
Senhor PE (2023-03-29 00:52:16+00:00): Se você precisar de mapas oficiais da Prefeitura eu te mando.
Senhor PE (2023-03-29 14:43:27+00:00): https://prefeiturasempapel.serra.es.gov.br/Arquivo/Documents/legislacao/html/L45142016.html
DressyPear4 (2023-03-25 19:29:01+00:00): Olá, poderia adicionar um comentário para que outros possam entender o que você está editando
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134113626
jmarchon (2023-04-09 21:34:34+00:00): Reverted in CS #134704579
goedegazelle (2023-03-25 20:09:08+00:00): (heeft hier nooit gezeten, is woonhuis).

Jawel, daarom heette het "Huis 56."
Jillis inactivE (2023-03-25 20:34:10+00:00): Volgens mij zat het toch echt aan de Ugchelseweg (waar het óók in OSM stond), niet hier.
goedegazelle (2023-03-25 21:41:14+00:00): Dat zou kunnen, het is alweer lang geleden.
highflyer74 (2023-03-30 08:10:32+00:00): Vandalism reverted after community discussion.
MapSpot (2023-03-25 19:43:33+00:00): I don't see any changes comments yet that elaborate on this change. Have you spoken at all with the local community about this beforehand? (This borough/town designation seems to be a recurring issue from what I've heard.)

It's also best not to publish a large-scale change like this merely for making a label render better on OSM Carto. 

Try to consider the following.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
user_18794293 (2023-03-25 20:20:07+00:00): I published the changeset a little more than an hour ago, don't fret.
It's not a "large scale change", I changed one tag on five nodes, it's one of the smallest scale changes one could make on OpenStreetMap.

... place=suburb is wrong, since New York boroughs, like their name says, are not suburbs, suburb is equivalent of neighborhood the size of a village and tagging them as suburbs takes away the possibility to use the place=suburbs tags for actual suburbs of New York, confining them to place=neighbourhood and place=quarter, further continuing the mismatch of neighborhood size and tag (suburbs would be tagged as quarters and quarters as neighborhoods).

I am not against using the tag place=borough, but I think the best way of handling this includes considering the fact that OpenStreetMap should also be a map, not simply a database, for the simple reason that if was only intended to be a database the home page of it wouldn't showcase a map. So, even if it is undeniably wrong using the town tag, for the time being it's the most logical solution, since also suburb would be wrong. 

Probably town is less wrong even without considering the rendering issue, since, apart from Staten Island, these places were towns before and as I said previously, a borough is the neighborhood the size of a town, so it's a basically a town inside a city.
ZeLonewolf (2023-03-25 20:29:56+00:00): I've reverted changes to borough tagging in New York City to restore the status quo pending community discussion. Thank you HeadAsylum432 for attempting to improve the map, but it is important to discuss significant changes with the local mapping community before making them. I would encourage you to join the OSM US slack server (slack.openstreetmap.us) in the channel #local-nyc to connect with other mappers in the city on mapping issues. The tagging of NYC boroughs is a fairly contentious topic that shouldn't changed unilaterally.
MxxCon (2023-03-26 06:46:14+00:00): It sounds like you are tagging things based on your understanding of meaning of plain English language words, not the meaning used in OSM. It is highly recommend to read the OSM wiki, such as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dsuburb

The fact that something doesn't show up on the default map doesn't mean you should be tagging things incorrectly until they do. The default OSM map style is not the only one used and it's not the most exhaustive. For example it doesn't render rollercoasters. There are many purpose-specific mapping styles which have more accurate and more complete support for various tags, such are place=* tags. Changing tags for the default map's deficiencies will break things for the accurate maps.
user_18794293 (2023-03-26 14:18:25+00:00): It sounds like you are tagging things based on your understanding of meaning of plain English language words, not the meaning used in OSM. It is highly recommend to read the OSM wiki, such as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dsuburb
 
Nope I got it very clear, could you say the point in my reasoning that gave you that impression?
user_18794293 (2023-03-26 14:21:02+00:00): My whole point is that this tagging breaks things for the accurate maps, and while the optimal solution would be to tag them as boroughs I don't like that because they would not be displayed on the default layer of OSM, so I settle for the second most optimal solution, instead of settling for the third most optimal solution that is tagging them as suburbs.
user_18794293 (2023-03-26 14:24:05+00:00): I don't understand how is this tagging for the renderer, if you didn't care at all for the renderer you would vouch for tagging them as boroughs, the very reason we are talking about this is because we want them to be displayed on the map, at the cost of using a wrong tag like suburb.
Woazboat (2023-03-26 18:37:22+00:00): Tags aside, changes like this and a lot of your other recent changes absolutely need to be discussed with the local community beforehand. You cannot just unilaterally change things across the world while disregarding local tagging customs and preceding discussions.
snoozingnewt (2023-03-27 05:13:11+00:00): Hi!
As said earlier, you should try to join the OSM US Slack server (slack.openstreetmap.us).

As a local, I don't call Brooklyn (for example) a suburb, but I also don't call it a town. In a nutshell, two wrongs don't make a right. If you think something is mistagged so you change the tags to something else that's wrong because it looks better on the renderer, that's exactly the definition of tagging for the renderer.

Everyone would love a discussion about whether/how the tagging should be changed, and I encourage you to join the Slack!
user_18794293 (2023-03-27 10:10:05+00:00): What is so hard to understand about what I'm saying? I specifically said that town is wrong, but in my opinion is less wrong than suburb, because it doesn't entail all sort of collateral effects and it's also more correct from a definition standpoint, since a borough has the importance of a town.
If you were so concerned about the right thing you would edit the map changing the place to borough. Since apparently no one has that intention, and neither do I, I want to settle for the next best thing. How is this not an improvement?
snoozingnewt (2023-03-27 16:09:48+00:00): I would consider town even worse. Your three arguments for town being better are that
1. It renders better
2. These places used to be towns
3. They’re basically the same size as towns… right?
As established, the first is tagging for the renderer. Saying these places were towns in the past does not make them towns today (they aren’t). Lastly, because they are the same size as a town does not make them a town (regardless, each borough would be big enough to be considered a city in its own right). This makes tagging them as towns more inaccurate, which is why people are confused.
If you’re so concerned, maybe you should discuss with the greater community first rather than just assume people should agree with your subjective opinions. Maybe they should be changed to borough! But you are accepting it as impossible without even trying to interact with the greater community. No one’s saying you’re wrong about borough being better.
MxxCon (2023-03-27 17:01:26+00:00): @HeadAsylum432, being a brand new mapper, it will do you well to be less confrontational and to listen to the constructive criticism from multiple experienced mappers.
OSM has a lot of nuance in tags and nomenclature that might not be obvious to beginners, in part becuase it's using British English and not American English.
user_18794293 (2023-03-27 17:05:11+00:00): Where did I say someone said I am wrong about borough being better?

1. It renders better
2. These places used to be towns
3. They’re basically the same size as towns… 

How do these arguments don't hold up to saying that town is better than suburb?
I AM NOT SAYING THAT TOWN IS THE PERFECT SOLUTION, I SIMPLY THINK IT'S BETTER THAN SUBURB.
SINCE NO ONE HERE IS DEFENDING THE USE OF THE TAG SUBURB I DON'T SEE WHAT IS THE PROBLEM WITH A SMALL IMPROVEMENT.
I needed to write that as all-caps because I already wrote it and clearly it hasn't been read.
If you think city is better than town that doesn't mean that town isn't better than suburb. 
Could we simply focus on the fact of the matter, that is taking a wrong and making it a little better?

And the arguments you cited are not my only arguments, although valid.
I specifically said that tagging boroughs suburbs means actual suburbs are tagged quarters and actual quarters as neighborhoods, and actual neighborhoods and quarters as the same thing.
Convenient to skip that argument?
MxxCon (2023-03-27 17:12:02+00:00): What is your understanding of place=suburb?
snoozingnewt (2023-03-27 17:17:07+00:00): Validity aside, you’re saying town is better because you can’t change it to borough, but you can’t change it to town for the exact same reasons… why are you wasting energy trying to change to a subpar tag if you can’t change it for the exact same reasons? 

Do you have examples of actual suburbs being tagged as quarters, neighborhoods, etc?  I consider everything else to be tagged 100% right.

As has been said previously (but you seem to have continuously ignored), this needs a discussion that is constructive and that can be accomplished easier on other channels of communication. I invite you to talk there!
snoozingnewt (2023-03-27 17:18:47+00:00): My bad, I’ve seen that you’ve joined 👍