piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
-=|MisterY|=- (2025-03-04 21:37:28+00:00): Hey! It is really a pleasure and honor to have your feedback.
As far as the technicalities go, the summary is contained in the wiki at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Climbing
I've seen quite a few threads, some older than 10 years, where these issues are discussed. Then they have been summarized on the wiki page. I've also initiated a few discussions at the end of the last year.
I find having crags on a map quite useful. Whether it is practical to have every route or not, is a separate story. You are right in that the routes are (mostly) vertical. That's why route_bottom is mostly used. Easy multi-pitches can easily be as horizontal as they are vertical. But nevermind.
As OSM is just a database, projects like Open Climbing are utilizing it in creative ways to also contain photos and topos. I really like and appreciate the effort. I do like to have multi-pitch routes shown. Sometimes I add them as a crag, so they are visible within an area. Still no precise definition in that regard. I guess, in OSM things just evolve and are rarely established.
We've had tons of discussions about the categorization of Paths, over several months, with nothing coming out of it.
Even if not used, I think it does not harm to have this information on a map. There's a lot of information that I find less useful than climbing routes so I would not worry about that too much. Climbing routes don't change that often. Or at least not as often as kebab kiosks.
I believe it generally helps make the sport more accessible and popular. Which should also result in more people getting the actual guides to get full topos of the routes (or use sites like Bergsteigen). Seeing a climbing crag on a map would give one an idea that climbing in that region is possible, eventually prompting them to look for more information (I'm definitely in that group, for example). 
In any case, I'll follow you on OSM as I would definitely like to climb some routes in the Hochschwab area this year. So far I've only done some scrambling on Ebenstein and Feistringturm.
-=|MisterY|=- (2025-03-04 21:52:21+00:00): Here's the latest thread on the topic, with some history: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/is-the-current-climbing-wiki-correct/120225/
mcliquid (2024-11-04 07:54:57+00:00): Danke! Habe dafür dieses Issue angelegt: https://github.com/OpenBracketsCH/defikarte.ch/issues/55
Rainero (2024-11-04 10:24:49+00:00): Hallo mcliquid,

User chnuessli wurde schon aktiv, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147333502  
Ursprünglich waren es 58 Einträge in Deutschland. Die noch übrigen zeigen ein weiteres Problem, weshalb ich sie noch nicht erledigt habe: Die App wartet scheinbar nicht den GNSS-Fix ab, sondern nimmt die letzte Geoposition, die weit von der aktuellen Position entfernt liegen kann. Damit wird der neue Node falsch positioniert. Dasselbe Problem hatte früher die Wheelmap App.  

In Vorarlberg war jemand sehr aktiv, in Österreich gibt es 490 Defis mit Notrufnummer 144, davon die meisten in Vorarlberg: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1TC7  
Bestimmt sind wie in D auch viele Duplikate dabei.

Servus,
Rainer
Rainero (2024-11-04 10:36:25+00:00): Ich habe für die fehlpositionierten ein Ticket erstellt: https://github.com/OpenBracketsCH/defikarte.ch/issues/56
mcliquid (2024-11-04 17:33:20+00:00): Danke dir!
limes11 (2024-11-05 23:26:02+00:00): Hallo, 

welche Quelle wurde hier verwendet ? Wenn Daten aus anderen Quellen unverändert importiert werden, ist die Quellenangabe essentiell.

Vielen Dank
BenutzerXYXY (2024-11-06 21:14:27+00:00): Guten Abend,
ich hatte eigentlich versucht klarzumachen, welche Daten ich verwendet habe. Die Landschaftsinformationssammlung NRW (kurz WMS LINFOS) wird vom Land NRW gepflegt und ist inzwischen Open Data. Unter den Stichworten „WMS LINFOS“ bzw. „Landschaftsinformationssammlung (LINFOS) NRW“ (je nachdem, welche Webseite des Landes man gerade erwischt hat) erhält man die Umrissdateien über die Open Data-Internetseiten des Landes. Daher habe ich im Änderungsdatensatz WMS LINFOS als Quelle angegeben und glaubte damit, meiner Informationspflicht genüge getan zu haben. Dennoch bin ich gerne bereit, meine Quellenangabe etwas transparenter zu machen, wenn Du mir einen guten Vorschlag machen kannst, wie ich das konkret machen sollte.
Viele Grüße
limes11 (2024-11-06 21:29:08+00:00): Danke für die Antwort. Habe ich tatsächlich nicht gesehen. 
Generell würde ich das noch zusätzlich als source am Objekt selbst ergänzen, das macht die Prüfung zu späteren Zeitpunkten, wenn bereits mehrere Veränderungen vorgenommen wurden, einfacher.
"Open Data" ist so eine Sache, es hängt von der angewendeten Lizenz ab, ob wir die Daten hier einbinden können. Bei der Zero-2.0-Variante ist das fein.

Viele Grüße
BenutzerXYXY (2024-11-06 21:45:20+00:00): Mit dem source-Tag am Objekt habe ich immer meine Schwierigkeiten, da meist nicht so klar ersichtlich ist, worauf sich die Quelle bezieht (Umriss, Name, Referenznummer oder was auch immer). Jetzt wo ich drüber nachdenke, wäre „source:shape“ wohl am sinnvollsten. Werde das in den kommenden Tagen ergänzen, wenn ich die Zeit dazu finde, dann sollte das ganze ein bisschen klarer werden.
Auf die Art der Lizenz habe ich geachtet, trotzdem herzlichen Dank für den Hinweis.
Schönen Abend noch!
felipeeugenio (2024-11-03 13:51:47+00:00): Hola. Estaba dibujado como la entrada a un edificio residencial.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158678558
Udarian (2024-11-02 22:37:51+00:00): the bicycle=designated foot=	designated means that this is bicycle and foot path specifically marking those as private stops that, also these aren't for cars so the general access=private doesn't really apply to the bicycle and foot paths.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-11-13 14:05:55+00:00): Hi ilias_
I see that you have removed some relations due to that document you have put, but can you please add rest what are new admin_level=6 relations, now this is the only part of Morocco that has not admin_level=6 boundary
ilias_ (2024-11-13 14:50:23+00:00): Done https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159094868 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159094716
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-11-13 21:45:36+00:00): Awesome!!! Thank you
Leo Slager (2025-02-18 21:47:27+00:00): Hoi A67-A67,

Is de rotonde bij Nieuwe Tonge al volledig in gebruik. Nu routeert ze niet.
Zie ook 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4632654#map=17/51.720172/4.172966&layers=N
A67-A67 (2025-02-19 20:50:18+00:00): Hoi,
De rotonde is met een tijdelijke indeling in gebruik. Daarbij is het een enkelstrooks rotonde die gebruik maakt van een deel van de rijbanen van de toekomstige turborotonde.
Jose Luis Infante (2024-11-03 01:20:19+00:00): Hola,
gracias por las ediciones, aunque he tenido que revertir el borrado de las pasarelas ya que tenían el etiquetado correcto con el prefijo "destroyed", indicando que han sido destruidas por la DANA.
Normalmente cuando algo ha dejado de existir puede eliminarse, pero en este caso es interesante que permanezca el elemento por varios motivos. Uno de ellos es que podría ser reconstruido en un futuro, y quedaría el histórico de que fue destruido. Otro es disponer de una recopilación de elementos destruidos en la base de datos.
Por último, echa un vistazo a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Espa%C3%B1a/Humanitario/DANA_2024 .
Sigue editando, porque necesitamos el conocimiento local de la zona.
Un saludo!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158679292
Hufkratzer (2024-11-03 21:33:59+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1330285654 and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1330285655
don't look like horse riding centres, they lok like (outdoor) horse riding arenas; and in OSM such riding arenas are usually tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1171574117

In JOSM you can use the preset for "Equestrian Sport" to tag them.
BarryMyles (2024-11-03 22:20:15+00:00): Oops, first times I'd tried to tag one of those. Fixed. Thanks for the advice!
YomanNH (2024-11-04 18:49:02+00:00): Odklej landuse od chodników i ścieżek. Pisałem o tym wielokrotnie pod twoimi edycjami i naprawiałem to, co psułeś, a ty dalej nie potrafisz prawidłowo mapować i ignorujesz moje uwagi.

Z dokumentacji:
"It is strongly discouraged to glue landuse to road lines. Glued landuse makes the data much harder to work with. It is better to have the landuse boundary stop at the edge of the road, the edge of right of way, or overlap the road completely."
Źródło: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=residential
kubahahaha_bot (2024-11-20 09:42:53+00:00): Przy braku odpowiedzi na komentarze i wciąż rysowaniu niezgodnie z zasadami można zacząć po prostu wycofywać zestawy zmian
YomanNH (2024-11-21 21:14:34+00:00): Tak będę robił w przyszłości.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-02 22:51:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12308310223

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-11-03 00:40:09+00:00): Poprawione.
nevw (2024-11-02 23:26:10+00:00): Hi, you have dragged a node on Stephensons Place. Can you correct that and also remove the name=Residential Dwelling tag on all the houses.
The name tag is reserved for things that really do have a name as described in our wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
nevw (2024-11-02 23:45:50+00:00): ….also the name=Footpath needs to be deleted.
nevw (2024-11-03 01:37:24+00:00): I notice some of the building near the corner of Hayfield Road and Milloo Crescent have their right side cut off where aligned with edge of your data.
Do you intend to return to each of these dumps of data and fix up such errors?
fortera_au (2024-11-03 03:33:45+00:00): That cut off makes it seem like this is some kind of import maybe? Can you confirm where the geojson mentioned as a source in the changeset comes from?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158679558
Alliegaytor (2024-11-03 03:48:14+00:00): I'm pretty sure they are using this one


geojson: https://tasks.smartcitiestransport.com/api/v2/projects/71/tasks/?as_file=true

from

https://tasks.smartcitiestransport.com/projects/71#description

I just checked and the buildings are cutoff exactly along the borders of "taskId=172"
fortera_au (2024-11-03 21:41:31+00:00): Yeah that definitely seems like it's being done wrong, and probably worthy of being reverted if it's not able to easily be fixed up.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158679558
nevw (2024-11-04 01:49:09+00:00): I have fixed up the data that @22040316 left for us to quality control.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=158723106
emersonveenstra (2024-11-03 13:15:21+00:00): Hi there,

Thanks for the addition! "landuse=farmland" is more for large areas of farmland, a community farm/garden like this should be tagged "leisure=garden" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgarden) and "garden:type=community" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:garden:type)

Hope this helps!
AR1633 (2024-11-03 17:04:51+00:00): Thanks for the tip! I am very inexperienced with OpenStreetMap. In fact I can't find how to change its tags; I don't see options for leisure=garden or garden:type in the GUI. If you could make the changes that would be great; I'm not sure if it's appropriate for me to ask that.
emersonveenstra (2024-11-18 16:18:08+00:00): Sure thing, i've made the changes
Владимир К (2024-11-04 10:54:15+00:00): reverted
Владимир К (2024-11-04 10:53:25+00:00): reverted
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-02 23:30:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12308386064
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535833033

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Владимир К (2024-11-04 10:53:32+00:00): reverted
Alliegaytor (2024-11-03 01:41:42+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for contributing to Open Street Map.

I can see you added the name "Residential Dwelling" to the houses in this changeset. That's not necessary to do as the houses are almost certainly not all called / are known by "Residential Dwelling". Please see the wiki page about names I've linked below.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name

If you could remove those names that would be great!

Happy mapping!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-11-03 22:15:59+00:00): Please do not change motorways and trunk roads around Montreal, they have been adjusted with precise sources and should only be updated after road works. Thanks!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-11-03 22:19:25+00:00): In Quebec, we use the theorical gore (including paint) instead of the physical one for merging transition lanes. Thanks!
jbeat (2024-11-03 23:56:10+00:00): Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy, the reason I edited this is because it's a good physical representation. My tesla GPS said there was two turning lane when there is in fact only one causing me to miss my exit.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-11-04 01:01:48+00:00): Ok but tesla is using google maps as navigation map data since at least 3-4 years.

I will verify the number of lanes there as soon as possible.
jbeat (2024-11-04 02:24:11+00:00): Tesla does not exclusively use google maps. They use a combination of sources, including OSM.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-11-04 10:59:42+00:00): After checking, it seems it could be true for Tesla to use OSM data. I checked the configuration of Boulevard Taschereau there and the right lane is so large that it was counted as two lanes, but there is indeed no markings so I converted to 4 lanes instead of 5 for this segment. I also changed the double exit lane to a single one. There used to be a bus lane there but it seems it is now inactive. See https://ibb.co/9VZr178 where we moved the exit lane up to the theoritical painted gore.
syntex (2024-11-03 10:50:37+00:00): To nie uzasadnia jej skasowania. Punkt z nazwą miejscowości powinien zostać zdegradowany do place=locality (nadal istnieje co potwierdza Państwowy Rejestr Nazw Geograficznych). Droga również istnieje i jej skasowanie jest niepoprawne. Z racji tego, iż obecnie już w tym miejscu nie ma nowej zabudowy, warto pozostawić zburzone budynki ze znacznikiem demolished:building zamiast je kasować.
LugiPL (2024-11-03 11:05:30+00:00): Tylko ze droga pozostala ale leśna, a po budynkach nie ma śladu. Faktycznie młynek nadal istnieje ale tylko jako pozostałosc tego miejsca.
syntex (2024-11-03 14:25:37+00:00): To można zmienić typ na track. Usuwanie jest nieuzasadnione. A dla niezamieszkanej miejscowości jest właśnie place=locality (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:place%3Dlocality)
mcliquid (2024-11-12 10:06:18+00:00): Müsste der See nicht "inner" statt "outer" vom Wald sein? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18243603
alamero (2024-11-12 10:48:30+00:00): Vermutlich schon? Ich hab das nur dem anderen See angeglichen, weil Du das dort auch so eingetragen hattest.
mcliquid (2024-11-12 12:14:54+00:00): Hab's korrigiert :)
tuxayo (2024-11-03 00:09:41+00:00): Errata: source en plus: Bing Streetside pour le nom sur un panneau
Jarek 🚲 (2024-11-06 17:54:25+00:00): Hello,

In this edit you deleted a crosswalk with flashing lights (PXO) at Barondale and west side of Whistler Crescent: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12255805575/history . I added it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157977678 having seen it in in-person survey. I would ask that you do not delete data in areas you are not familiar with, and check OSM history if unsure.
Jarek 🚲 (2024-11-06 18:06:16+00:00): Sorry, the deleted crosswalk was actually in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158682620 - another of your edits in the area
infeeeee (2025-01-27 23:25:49+00:00): Wikidatán a tiktok felhasználónál kifejezetten kérik, hogy a @ ne legyen része:

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P7085

Szerintem itt is így kéne gyűjteni, hogy kompatibilis legyen. Ledokumentáltam itt: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Item:Q22837
BR_pebble (2025-02-14 08:36:15+00:00): Hello 22040316
 Thank you for mapping!
 I have created missing buildings: way 1330310438
 way 1331252306
 way 1330310429
 way 1330310435
 way 1330310430
 way 1330310428
 way 1331252319
 way 1331252318
 way 1331252317
 way 1331252315
 way 1331252316
 way 1331252314
 way 1331252313
 way 1331252311
 way 1331252312
 way 1331252309
 way 1331252310
 way 1331252308
 way 1331252307
 way 1331252321
 way 1331252320
 Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
 Happy Mapping!
rui228 (2025-04-02 16:44:19+00:00): Com a introdução da linha 15 da BusWay.  A empresa Inácio (auto-viação do Souto), deixou de operar entre o Furadouro e São João da Madeira.
Jarek 🚲 (2024-11-06 18:06:56+00:00): This edit wrongly deleted a PXO I mapped, please see discussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158682128
Jarek 🚲 (2024-11-28 15:46:29+00:00): Hello,

In addition to my previous comments about the PXO, I have one more:

You tagged tactile_paving=yes on crossings like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12308510874 (Barondale and Cortina east leg) and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12308510868 (west leg). Those crossings don't have tactile paving. I was checking my photos from walking along here in mid-October and they look like this: https://imgur.com/a/akXCsxs - the curb is indeed lowered, but there is no tactile paving at all.

Can you check what you tagged the tactile paving based on, and make corrections accordingly?

Thanks,
--Jarek
Jarek 🚲 (2025-06-09 02:37:14+00:00): Per the above, I have now removed the tactile_paving=yes tags added by you in this area in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167374082
CurlingMan13 (2024-11-03 02:57:42+00:00): Edit reviewed (via periodic review).  Good edit.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158682722
DUGA (2024-11-03 01:54:29+00:00): Not sure why the comment was gone, but this was to remove buildings razed by the city after a recent fire.
felipeeugenio (2024-11-03 13:49:17+00:00): Hola. por favor escribir con capitalización normal de las palabras. No escribimos en mayúsculas.

Además, hay una faena ahí realmente? o son las instalaciones para la prospección?

saludos
cswilson252 (2026-03-23 01:20:28+00:00): Reverting as abandoned railways that are no longer visible on aerial imagery are better suited for OpenHistoricalMap (OHM).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180277636
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:43:16+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165095451
citrula (2024-11-14 19:05:55+00:00): Is the deleted track going north of Lakeline gone now? Last time I was over that way I could still see it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158683045
Udarian (2024-11-03 17:50:02+00:00): next time please don't remove footway=sidewalk from ways along the side of a road (even if it is a service roads) that are tagged as sidewalks.
cswilson252 (2026-04-05 03:48:41+00:00): Revert: Abandoned railways should be mapped on OHM

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180879192
mcliquid (2024-11-04 18:09:24+00:00): Grüß dich, ich glaube auch hier wäre "natural=shingle" besser geeignet als "natural=beach" oder?
alamero (2024-11-04 21:50:50+00:00): Stimmt, das kannte ich noch gar nicht. Danke! :)
felipeeugenio (2024-11-03 13:35:37+00:00): Hola Domingo, gracias por sus ediciones.
Pero por favor un poco de cuidado; El parque no es un zoológico y los límites que le agregó difieren bastante a los que hay en la página del parque. 
Voy a intentar arreglar los dibujos para que quede mejor representado.

saludos
nevw (2024-11-03 06:14:54+00:00): Hi 22040316
I see you have moved on to mapping in a different country now.
Can we expect you to fix the changesets as commented upon east of Melbourne?
divaddivag (2024-11-04 07:27:23+00:00): Hi Whiskymack, this not the way multipolygon are meant and used for: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Relation:multipolygon . In this case, this not necessary so it is best to revert its previous version, as well as what you have done elsewhere  such as: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18195770 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18140892 . Thanks in advance for your collaboration. David
jtracey (2024-12-02 20:59:54+00:00): Please don't tag things as cycleways simply because bicycles can use it. E.g., a driveway is not a cycleway, even if using it is required to access cycle routes.
Johnwhelan (2025-09-21 14:28:54+00:00): Is it really necessary to clutter up the map with horse=no, bicycle and foot=unknown on a 7 node residential highway?
felipeeugenio (2024-11-03 13:00:34+00:00): Hola. Gracias por su tiempo y sus ediciones, pero le pedimos por favor notar como estás dibujadas las cosas en OSM. Vamos a tener que pasar varios minutos arreglando esto.
1)	Por favor no usar nombres genéricos. “vía sin nombre” y nombres así no son oficiales.
2)	Por favor no modificar los habitantes de los pueblos sin consultar a la comunidad y a los encargados de hacer las importaciones desde el INE
3)	S/N no es un número. Se usa nohousenumber=yes. Y las plazas nunca han tenido dirección
4)	Sacó nombres de supermercados para reemplazarlos por los stripcenters que los contienen, sin embargo, agregó el nombre de los estacionamientos como si fueran de los supermercados y además agregó el tag de supermercado. No tiene mucha lógica lo que intentó hacer.
5)	Borró además el nombre de un canal
Por favor incorporarse al chat de la comunidad de OSM Chile en Telegram (https://t.me/OSMcl) si quiere hacer consultas, ahí varias decenas de maperos contestarán sus inquietudes

Saludos y gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158685426
felipeeugenio (2024-11-03 13:18:39+00:00): Se llama Realmente ese strip center INACAP? o es que queda cerca del INACAP? no encuentro referencias al nombre.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158685426
infeeeee (2024-11-05 18:31:00+00:00): Szia!

Ezzel a ponttal kapcsolatban írok: https://osm.org/node/12308882696

Facebook oldalak címét nem a website hanem contact:facebook mezőben tároljuk. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:facebook

További jó térképezést!
GerdP (2024-11-04 08:45:34+00:00): Korrektur copy+paste Fehler: Radtour fand am 2.11.2024 statt
GerdP (2024-11-04 08:45:41+00:00): Korrektur copy+paste Fehler: Radtour fand am 2.11.2024 statt
GerdP (2024-11-04 08:45:46+00:00): Korrektur copy+paste Fehler: Radtour fand am 2.11.2024 statt
GerdP (2024-11-04 08:45:51+00:00): Korrektur copy+paste Fehler: Radtour fand am 2.11.2024 statt
GerdP (2024-11-04 08:45:57+00:00): Korrektur copy+paste Fehler: Radtour fand am 2.11.2024 statt
GerdP (2024-11-04 08:46:06+00:00): Korrektur copy+paste Fehler: Radtour fand am 2.11.2024 statt
flohoff (2024-11-03 08:24:14+00:00): 
Hi,
hat funktioniert ;) Das routing des Durchgangsverkehrs hat sich geändert ;)

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=543879,876279#51.9944,8.81413,13z
Deus Figendi (2024-11-05 19:05:14+00:00): 👍

Das könnte tatsächlich Sinn und Zweck der Änderung gewesen sein, aber um ehrlich zu sein bin ich an den Stellen schon vorher oft 30 gefahren.
Marek-M (2024-11-03 10:50:30+00:00): Cześć, chodniki 'highway=footway` z zasady nie są przeznaczone dla rowerzystów, więc dodawanie do niego `bicycle=no` jest informacją nadmiarową.

Zmieniłem te chodniki w CS: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=158693025
eggie (2024-11-03 08:07:26+00:00): Oke... Wellicht zijn er al borden geplaatst G11 / G12a

Dat is ook de vraag die staat op fietspadaftakking naar de Wintereik. 

Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-11-03 08:09:03+00:00): Dit is de conform-wiki manier zoals we fietspaden taggen

G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway