piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2026-02-09 16:44:01+00:00): See my previous comment about tagging of buildings.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178282248
Sanniu (2026-04-20 07:46:12+00:00): Hi, you have changed the name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166952511, but not name:he and not the associated addresses. This breaks Nominatum address search.
Negreheb (2026-07-31 06:28:50+00:00): Servus LanciaDelta, du machst in Freilassing ja viel und hier habe ich angemerkt, dass meiner meinung nach falsche extra way für Radspur eingezeichnet wurden. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5215643 hier im Gebiet die zwei Notes. 
Zumindest bei uns in Österreich werden Radwege nur separat gezeichnet, wenn sei baulich getrennt sind und darüber gibts zwar eh viel Diskussion, aber fast alle stimmen überein, dass "Farbe" keine bauliche Trennung ist :D 

Ich fände es besser, wenns hier als lane abgebildet wird - aber vielleicht hast du ja eine andere Meinung dazu oder es gab schon eine Diskussion? 

Ahjo, in Salzbug gibts jeden ersten Dienstag im Monat einen OSM-Treffpunkt, falls du mal Zeit und Lust hast :)

Alles gute
Znaika (2026-07-31 08:42:23+00:00): Hallo,
zudem noch habe ich bei der Radfahrerkarte gemerkt, daß cycleway=lane bei der Bundesstraße 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39782540 eingetragen ist, was eigentlich richtig wäre und der separate Weg überflüssig ist.
Gruß,  Znaika
Negreheb (2026-07-31 08:49:44+00:00): Ah, guter Spot, danke, hab ich gar nicht daran gedacht zu schauen. Ich warte mal ein bisschen, dann werde ich das sonst löschen. Gern sonst auch du? :) (ich kenn mich, ich vergess es womöglich und denk erst nach längerer Zeit dran)
Znaika (2026-07-31 08:56:53+00:00): Hi, das mag ich nicht anzufassen,  wenn die Wege  mit Flächen (Wald, Wohngebiet, etc.) verbunden sind. Ab und zu werden sie sogar als Abgrenzung zu Multipolygonen verwendet. Das vermeiden wir bei uns so zu machen
LanciaDelta (2026-07-31 15:40:22+00:00): Hallo, danke für die Hinweise! Da habe ich tatsächlich auch nicht dran gedacht. Vielleicht habe ich mich auch verführen lassen, weil sich dadurch eine saubere Abgrenzung von Landschaft und Straße ergab :)
Ich lösche die beiden Radwege wieder raus.
@Negreheb: Danke für die Einladung. Dienstags is für mich leider sehr schwierig, aber mal sehen, vielleicht geht sich's ja mal aus :)

Viele Grüße
eggie (2026-02-08 20:44:41+00:00): Hoi.. svp de adresnode gebruiken. Niet het gebouw.
Gr eggie
eggie (2026-02-08 21:02:42+00:00): Info verplaatst
Aad217 (2026-02-08 21:18:39+00:00): Dank voor de tip ga ik doen.

Gr. Aad
eggie (2026-02-08 21:24:08+00:00): Hier heb ik het even op die gecombineerde adresnode gezet.
Officieel bestaan die adressen niet.
Maar voor de volgende keer.
Mapse
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-03 14:56:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 185044755, 185044712, 185044792, 185043031, 185044858, 185044854, 185044726, 185044802, 185044684, 185044693, 185043064, 185044766, 185044834, 185044779, 185043050, 185044776, 185043074, 185043054, 185044732, 185043091, 185044704, 185044746, 185044715, 185043085, 185044894, 185044810, 185044795, 185044765, 185044862, 185043059, 185044750, 185044758, 185043076, 185044812, 185044785, 185043015, 185043039, 185044823, 185044748, 185044738, 185044744, 185044734, 185044845, 185044702, 185044835, 185044888, 185044873, 185044731, 185044879, 185044817, 185044827, 185044789, 185044865, 185044720, 185044843, 185043045, 185044839, 185044849, 185044771, 185044694, 185044768, 185044707, 185043066 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy imports in Ivory Coast
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-03 14:55:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 185044755, 185044712, 185044792, 185043031, 185044858, 185044854, 185044726, 185044802, 185044684, 185044693, 185043064, 185044766, 185044834, 185044779, 185043050, 185044776, 185043074, 185043054, 185044732, 185043091, 185044704, 185044746, 185044715, 185043085, 185044894, 185044810, 185044795, 185044765, 185044862, 185043059, 185044750, 185044758, 185043076, 185044812, 185044785, 185043015, 185043039, 185044823, 185044748, 185044738, 185044744, 185044734, 185044845, 185044702, 185044835, 185044888, 185044873, 185044731, 185044879, 185044817, 185044827, 185044789, 185044865, 185044720, 185044843, 185043045, 185044839, 185044849, 185044771, 185044694, 185044768, 185044707, 185043066 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy imports in Ivory Coast
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-03 14:55:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 185044755, 185044712, 185044792, 185043031, 185044858, 185044854, 185044726, 185044802, 185044684, 185044693, 185043064, 185044766, 185044834, 185044779, 185043050, 185044776, 185043074, 185043054, 185044732, 185043091, 185044704, 185044746, 185044715, 185043085, 185044894, 185044810, 185044795, 185044765, 185044862, 185043059, 185044750, 185044758, 185043076, 185044812, 185044785, 185043015, 185043039, 185044823, 185044748, 185044738, 185044744, 185044734, 185044845, 185044702, 185044835, 185044888, 185044873, 185044731, 185044879, 185044817, 185044827, 185044789, 185044865, 185044720, 185044843, 185043045, 185044839, 185044849, 185044771, 185044694, 185044768, 185044707, 185043066 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy imports in Ivory Coast
eggie (2026-02-08 20:43:43+00:00): Dag Aad..
Bij osm Nederland is het gebruikelijk om op de adresnode bij te taggen. Dus niet op de gebouwomtrek.
Groet,
eggie
eggie (2026-02-08 21:04:26+00:00): Info verplaatst naar adresnode
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-08 22:52:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3611821591
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1475388170

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-08 23:12:07+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3611821591
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1475388170

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-08 23:32:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3611821591
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1475388170

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-08 23:42:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3611821591
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1475388170

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-08 23:52:06+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3611821591
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1475388170

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-08 23:12:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13535266823

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-08 23:32:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13535266823

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-08 23:52:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13535266823

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2026-02-09 16:56:41+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key while selected 
Don't map/tag courtyards as a building.
See this object
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1475391259/history#map=19/13.915775/21.783019
Best regards
OSM_RogerWilco (2026-02-18 10:17:36+00:00): Moin Ropino,

aus welchem Grund hast Du die Wasserfläche der Aller gelöscht? Aus Versehen?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97866418

Gruß Roger Wilco
Ropino (2026-02-18 11:40:54+00:00): Wurde wieder hergestellt.
saeYaiv0 (2026-03-28 23:00:59+00:00): Ich verstehe nicht ganz die Relations 1799471 und 20191607 beides Admin 8 Adminis Boundary - außer es liegt ein Fehler durch Doppelung vor. Unterschied sind wohl zwei Ausschlussgebiete bei Rethmer Fähre.
Ropino (2026-03-29 08:41:07+00:00): Moin,
das war schlicht ein Bedienfehler in JOSM. Ich wollte die Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1799471
bearbeiten/ergänzen; ... habe mich dabei verklickt und statt die Relation zum bearbeiten zu öffnen, daneben geklickt, dadurch eine Kopie der Relation erzeugt, diese bearbeitet und dann gespeichert.
Ist jetzt korrigiert.
Danke für den Hinweis.
NeisBot (2026-02-09 07:17:21+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 19 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/934518117 v5 | 19 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178284306
NeisReview (2026-02-18 05:34:56+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178339899
porfiriopaiz (2026-02-09 06:13:38+00:00): Hola.

¿Qué se supone que hace este cambio que acabas de realizar? El comentario que has agregado no ofrece ningún tipo de información al respecto.
Frans S (2026-02-09 16:41:36+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Default buildings ought to be tagged as building=yes.
You tagged several buildings as construction despite they have a roof and thus completed.

Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178284467
NeisBot (2026-02-09 07:17:24+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/597393011 v3 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1474852236 v1 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13530051855 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178285057
NeisReview (2026-02-18 05:34:56+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178335600
Frans S (2026-02-09 11:23:13+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Check this webpage to see the adjustments I had to make.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=178304554
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178285113
Frans S (2026-02-09 11:23:18+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Check this webpage to see the adjustments I had to make.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=178304554
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178285113
eggie (2026-02-08 21:39:30+00:00): Top!
Frans S (2026-02-09 16:38:47+00:00): please do not map and tag  traces a route=foot
Use the standard taggings and requested in the project.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178285517
Frans S (2026-02-09 16:38:48+00:00): please do not map and tag  traces a route=foot
Use the standard taggings and requested in the project.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178285517
gurglypipe (2026-02-09 11:09:26+00:00): Nice work, and thank you for taking the time to align the imagery to Cadastral Parcels first :D

I added the missing kerb nodes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178306462, because they’re important for accessible routing (wheelchairs). The specific height of kerbs can be surveyed using StreetComplete later.

I’ll get out of your way though, happy mapping!
iMacThere4iAm (2026-02-11 23:09:47+00:00): I am learning all kinds of useful tools, such as Cadastral Parcels, from looking at your changes.
gurglypipe (2026-02-12 10:10:55+00:00): Oh excellent, glad they’re helpful. Happy to chat about things if you have any questions or anything :)
HellMap (2026-02-08 23:03:25+00:00): Thanks! Don't know if you are finished with this edit. There's a bunch of other stuff here too - several benches, bike parking, partial footway, partial path, approach from south side, planters along west road, bollards along south road, possibly playground area, possible other stuff I can't see from aerial or Mapillary (since I didn't go through), the surrounding grass area with dumpster location north, parking east. Just mentioning this kind of stuff generally, since my OsmAnd notes usually are very brief, because I can't really be typing long stuff as I bike past quickly. But I guess what I mean is that my intent is often that the whole location lacks detail, not just the immediate features. In other words, I would just open another note here next time saying "more benches" or something :) So I think it makes more sense to close the note when everything is mapped and record progress while there is more stuff to map.
markalex- (2026-02-08 23:19:10+00:00): Yes, with this one I was finished.
I missed bench closer to bushes.
"bike parking" (if the one next to bench) is not a bike parking, but rather a left over from removed playground. "Planters" are bins from same playground on their sides. 

But I understand what you mean. I'll reopen note here, and will be closing them less liberally
dmlls (2026-02-14 11:37:29+00:00): Hola @AonTwoWheels.

Por favor, asegúrate de que el https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:street coincida exactamente con el https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name de la calle. En este caso, debería ser simplemente "Carrer de Sant Francesc". De lo contrario, los consumidores de OSM no podrán extrapolar a qué calle se refiere la dirección. 

Además, el https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website:menu que has puesto es incorrecto.

Cualquier cosa no dudes en preguntar :)

Un saludo,
Diego
Frans S (2026-02-09 16:53:14+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178288148
Frans S (2026-02-09 16:33:55+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
I retagged footpapth in the more generic tag 'path'
A footpath isSpecially designed for pedestrians
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178288252
Frans S (2026-02-09 16:28:37+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Please follow the rooflines more accurate.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178288273
eggie (2026-02-09 08:06:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Locally maintained= is geen valide sleutel. De format van de verwjzing naar de wikipagina klopt niet.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
SolidColors (2026-02-09 01:16:19+00:00): Linked above is the 2024 version. The 2026 version includes the same changes: https://aimss.sans.com.sa/assets/FileManagerFiles/AIRAC%20AIP%20AMDT%2001_26_2026_01_22/documents/Root_WePub/Sans_Rep/Charts/AD%202/AD%202%20OEDF/Aerodrome%20Ground%20Movement%20Chart%20-%20ICAO.pdf
silversurfer83 (2026-02-09 08:16:38+00:00): Guten Morgen :)

kleiner Tip: Mit der Taste "Q" werden Gebäude (und andere Objekte, die es sein sollen) schön rechtwinklig.

Happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178290394
einnutzer72 (2026-04-26 14:19:57+00:00): O.K. Guter Tipp
Joseph R P (2026-02-11 00:07:01+00:00): Hello, what is the reasoning for removing the place=town tag from West Wendover?
Necessarycoot72 (2026-02-11 11:54:41+00:00): Oops. I messed that up. Though I was removing it from the relation.
Joseph R P (2026-02-11 14:37:29+00:00): No worries, I re-added the tag to the node.
NeisBot (2026-02-09 07:17:43+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 25 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1341107005 v1 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/4814499 v6 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1340472197 v1 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/12405715164 v2
https://osm.org/node/12399573840 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178290806
NeisReview (2026-02-18 05:34:57+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178341238
trial (2026-02-20 19:57:14+00:00): Not sure what you intented to do with node/11545747538, but probably not to move a point of a street at a wrong place!
 https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/11545747538
You ignored the warning made by iD, telling you that the street was crossing buildings. Some warnings may be irrelevant, but have to be checked, not blindly ignored.
NeisBot (2026-02-09 07:19:16+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13076600110 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Therapy office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-18 05:34:34+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178708531
(No visible changes after review)
kingkingHK (2026-02-09 06:36:13+00:00): Split too early again? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177647860