piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
maraf24 (2025-12-08 08:45:42+00:00): Proszę o nieusuwanie imion z nazwa ulic. 
Raz, że taka edycja jest niezgodna z ustaleniami społeczności OSM.
Dwa, że taka edycja wprowadza niezgodności z punktami adresowymi.
Aight 2009 (2025-12-08 09:38:43+00:00): A co to za ustalenia, że mamy sobie dowolnie fantazjować o nazwie ulicy, nie mając kontaktu z rzeczywistością? a adresy faktycznie do zmiany, jeśli nie zdążę zmienić możesz to zrobić
Dawid2849 (2025-12-08 09:58:16+00:00): Te ustalenia są spisane tutaj: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic
eggie (2025-12-08 08:05:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  De ingangen heb ik vastgemaakt aan de gebouwomtrek. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-08 08:07:26+00:00): De ingangen heb ik vastgemaakt aan de gebouwomtrek. (Ze lagen binnen het gebouw) Wellicht even checken of de positie juist is.

MVG
eggie
Joske1020 (2025-12-12 10:57:32+00:00): iD editor doet het niet goed op dat vlak, maar volgens de wiki moet je Quercus met een hoofdletter schrijven
https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=NL:Tag:genus%3DQuercus#Fouten_bij_het_labelen
wandelzot (2025-12-13 15:49:14+00:00): En u bent querulous. Je mag dit gerust zelf aanpassen, ik ben niet gevoelig over dingen die ik mogelijk niet correct getagd heb. Ik verander er dagelijks zelf tientallen. Of wil je een uitleg hoe je een hoofdletter q moet typen op een standaard keyboard? :)
Yunkers (2025-12-14 11:24:10+00:00): W terenie, przy wjeździe z Konopnickiej jest tabliczka z dwoma imionami i nazwiskiem. Więc zmiana jest błędna.
patmorgan235 (2025-12-08 03:42:16+00:00): Heeeeeey, could you be a little more descriptive on your change set names? it makes them harder to review when they're all just "various changes"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175643969
kaleidoscopica (2025-12-08 14:06:18+00:00): Sure (sorry, saw this after I just pushed one!)
tastrax (2025-12-08 02:43:38+00:00): You have only edited a short section of Algona Road - How far does the 90 speed limit extend?
BB12345 (2025-12-08 02:54:40+00:00): Onsite verification of the the speed zone which extends to between the last 2 building of Algona Road and Coffee Creek Tracks.
tastrax (2025-12-08 03:16:20+00:00): OK - I see you have just edited the section south to 90. I was worried you had a section of 90 between two 80's
Grazing6603 (2025-12-08 00:09:41+00:00): https://comune.brignanofrascata.al.it/it-it/vivere-il-comune/scheda
dzamper (2025-12-08 15:42:56+00:00): Nie dodajemy „nazw” opisowych do `name`
Ten pojemnik nie ma nazwy
dknelson9876 (2025-12-08 03:50:16+00:00): Hello uranium2662, and welcome to OSM and mapping in Utah! We're happy to have you. Because of our slightly unusual street names here in Utah, we have a specific page on the wiki about it (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions). Specifically, because the "South" part of this address is not typically found on the building or street sign, we as a local community have agreed that it belongs on the street (in a special name:prefix=* and name:full=* set of tags). This also makes OSM consistent with the state GIS datasets and most local government GIS datasets. It would be great if you could change this back, or I'll take care of it soon if I don't hear back from you. Feel free to ask if you have any questions! We can always use more people contributing to the map.
uranium2662 (2025-12-09 04:46:11+00:00): Thank you for taking the time to explain this to me. I've read up on the linked material, and I understand where I went wrong.
Yunkers (2025-12-23 10:50:00+00:00): W terenie jak byk na tablicach jest podane imię. Więc zmiana do wycofania.
Aight 2009 (2025-12-23 10:54:38+00:00): nazwa zgodna z Geoportal
Dawid2849 (2025-12-23 14:48:48+00:00): W OSM mapujemy to, co jest w terenie, a nie Geoportal. Nazwy z teryt można dodać do znacznika teryt:name
Yunkers (2025-12-23 14:57:18+00:00): Nazwa z geoportalu jest już w official_name. Nie na potrzeby jej dublowania.
Dawid2849 (2025-12-23 15:20:31+00:00): A, rzeczywiście
Dawid2849 (2025-12-23 19:11:23+00:00): Wycofane
lasagna (2025-12-08 00:43:38+00:00): Additional sources:
https://www.bawsca.org/uploads/userfiles/files/2024%20State%20of%20the%20Regional%20Water%20System%20Report_Final%202024-12-05_5PM.pdf
https://www.nps.gov/yose/getinvolved/hetchyproject.htm
Bing Streetside
Jarek 🚲 (2025-12-11 02:20:40+00:00): Hello, can you elaborate on what kind of sources, guidelines, or local knowledge you used to change the classification of this road?
Trevor_1 (2025-12-13 15:46:42+00:00): I changed it because it connects 2 motorways. It looks weird having that floating Motorway (Whoop-Up Drive) that only connects to Secondary roads
Jarek 🚲 (2025-12-14 02:28:23+00:00): Is there a local guideline that roads connecting two freeways are to be highway=primary roads?

I struggle to see network significance here. Whoop-Up Drive has been tagged as motorway because it is a dual carriageway with two interchanges (motorway tag is based on built form), but it clearly has only a local role, connecting city centre with the university and residential neighbourhoods. And similarly the stretch of University Drive you've upgraded here connects the Crowsnest with the university and residential neighbourhoods. I really doubt anyone would exit Crowsnest eastbound at University Drive and then take Whoop-Up Drive to get to downtown Lethbridge.

There's no through traffic function, no higher-order destinations here...
Taya_S (2025-12-08 05:33:50+00:00): Reverted unwarranted deletions of industrial facilities. Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19126

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175648931
QuiLe (2025-12-08 03:48:19+00:00): Hi there, and welcome to OSM! I see you added a Flock camera in a parking lot, but I don't think the camera is here. Could you please adjust the camera's geometry to be along the road?
Taya_S (2025-12-08 05:33:51+00:00): Reverted unwarranted deletions of industrial facilities. Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19126

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175648931
Yunkers (2025-12-20 16:24:33+00:00): W osm nie używamy skrótów w nazwach, więc ta poprawka, niestety, jest błędna.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-12-11 04:46:01+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175645501
ifrit (2025-12-15 00:46:29+00:00): Hey! It looks like you mistakenly renamed the city of Ottawa to "Ottawa City Hall". The relation you selected included the city boundaries, it has a node on top of the city hall so that maps know where to write the label "Ottawa".
patmorgan235 (2025-12-08 03:30:53+00:00): Hey Thanks for your contribution! In the future try and square up your building foot prints so they're nice and pretty. You can do this by pressing q if you're using the iD editor on OpenStreetMap.org
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175645978
yahirthebravo (2025-12-08 16:28:22+00:00): Thanks for the hint. I just tried it out. it's neat, I'll use it moving forward. Thank you!
patmorgan235 (2025-12-08 03:27:53+00:00): Hey thanks for your contribution! in the future please square up your tennis courts, you can do this by pressing Q if your using the iD editor on OpenStreatMap.org
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175646180
Frans S (2025-12-19 09:29:16+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
Please don't connect nodes of buildings to each other.
Best regards,
Frans S (2025-12-19 15:39:36+00:00): Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task.
 * Please accurately outline all buildings.
 * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such as roads and paths.

Keep on mapping!
user_5359 (2025-12-08 06:42:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/65523264 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
Frans S (2025-12-28 09:33:10+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
I don't know how you managed this, but your mappings have an offset of 6 and 3 meters. Did you alter the offset in JOSM ?
Anyhow, I fixed them.
Best regards
CanopyFalls (2025-12-28 19:20:34+00:00): Yes, I set the offset in JOSM using the existing data to align things as the project instructed contributors not to fix widespread alignment issues.

Bing imagery is not ground truth and there are GPS traces in the area that suggest the road is where the data was.
kitsee (2025-12-28 19:21:15+00:00): @Frans
You shouldn't rely on the alignment of Bing imagery. JOSM even gives a warning by default that Bing imagery may be misaligned. The error can become more extreme the more uneven the terrain is. There are public GPS traces in this area which suggest this road should moved by a few meters east and suggest the original mapping of these buildings was correct.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-12-08 04:28:04+00:00): 先停一下，朋友，你似乎对OSM的标签定义有点理解上的偏差
osm的住宅区也好社区也好小区也好不要只看中文译名，看原始tag的语义和osmwiki的用法。
此外你的道路，在小区内用的全是省道，给这个社区的adminlevel是1
换句话说你的小区在OSM上独立建国了
HellMap (2025-12-12 14:48:17+00:00): These tiny waterways are definitely not rivers. Please don't change minor waterways to such high classifications. Rivers are major waterways, for example you could normally drive a boat there, you cannot cross without a major bridge, etc., not these sort of overgrown minor melioration ditches and streams.
ScottWalkerAU (2025-12-09 06:31:13+00:00): Are these meant to be unit numbers instead of house numbers?
thebeastmodo1 (2025-12-09 08:32:45+00:00): OK maybe all house in the 20 Molly Morgan Drive need be all 20 on the map
ScottWalkerAU (2025-12-09 09:46:46+00:00): There's a second field you can use for the unit numbers, `addr:unit` to be used alongside `addr:housenumber` of 20
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-04 09:59:03+00:00): 👋  Территория детского сада — неправильное название. Что это за территория понятно, а вот название обычно что-то вроде Детский сад «Солнышко»
i2004 (2025-12-08 22:28:58+00:00): que modificaste?
AgusQui (2025-12-08 23:42:13+00:00): Información redundante en name
synthfi (2025-12-08 16:16:12+00:00): next time, can you break up your changeset by continent?
SomeoneElse (2025-12-12 17:44:53+00:00): @synthfi I suspect that it's forgivable in this case as they're using MAPS.ME to update the details of some airports they flew through - likely they weren't in a position to upload until they got home.
synthfi (2025-12-12 20:44:06+00:00): ahh that makes sense
ChrissW-R1 (2025-12-10 18:16:32+00:00): https://osm.org/node/13360790736

Why did you add this, if you don't know what it is? Can you describe it?
vectorial8192 (2025-12-11 03:33:46+00:00): I couldn't determine/notice what this is irl, but then I saw this from aerial imagery.
vectorial8192 (2025-12-11 03:34:00+00:00): Feel free to improve this if have more info.
NeisBot (2025-12-14 07:51:13+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "The Pines at Birmingham independent living community"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-14 14:40:21+00:00): ❌ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175650583
crushtheserpent (2026-01-21 03:36:36+00:00): Hello, this is in regard to ways 149009289, 27957694, 1456823420, 1456823421, 1420834778, 1076071603, 405301763, 405301759, 149009278, 405301754, & 1051244296.

The highway=* tagging on these ways should be reverted to highway=motorway and (where appropriate) highway=motorway_link. Additionally, access_control=* tags should be removed, as highway=motorway tags make access_control=* tags redundant. These ways represent the eastern terminus of the Marina Freeway and they should be tagged as motorways all the way to and from Slauson Boulevard. See the tagging of the western terminus of the Marina Freeway as an example of how to do it.
crushtheserpent (2026-01-21 03:49:28+00:00): Now that I noticed you also retagged the Marina Expressway as highway=primary, the tagging of these ways (13374200, 1302677241, 123561792, 398203285, 596884162, 596884160, 398203300, & 403844704) should also be reverted to what they were previously, highway=trunk or highway=trunk_link.

Additionally, the names of the ways listed in my previous comment and this comment should be reverted to what they were before your edits.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-01-21 06:09:16+00:00): I'll change them back to motorway.  The situation out west was quite unusual, given how the slip roads were given names (and that is usually discouraged). I ended up retagging the "main" road as a freeway until the first at-grade intersection at Mindanao Way.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-01-21 16:04:46+00:00): Okay, I changed the eastern terminus back to highway=motorway. However, the portion west of Mindanao Way is not a freeway due to the at-grade intersection. Also, why highway=trunk? That would leave a stub that doesn't even connect to any trunk roads. SR 90 appears to be a regional highway rather than a statewide or nationwide freeway like I-5, so I've determined that highway=primary + expressway=yes is the best way to tag SR 90 between SR 1 and Mindanao Way.
crushtheserpent (2026-02-19 00:13:13+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/California/2022_Highway_Classification_Guidelines#Urban_expressways These guidelines recommend tagging the westernmost portion of CA 90, between CA 1 (Lincoln Boulevard) and Mindanao Way, as "Trunk + expressway=yes" because that segment "[c]onnects Marina del Rey to freeway network." Trunk roads don't necessarily have to connect with other trunk roads or motorways.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-02-19 09:41:47+00:00): Trunk roads do have to connect to other trunk roads and motorways; otherwise, you'll be left with a stub that doesn't connect to any other trunk roads or motorways.
JoeG (2025-12-31 00:43:22+00:00): Hi! I intend to revert deleted fences in this one.
KennyDap (2025-12-08 06:55:17+00:00): Fix Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175650769
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-09 02:25:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19128
JoeG (2025-12-31 00:39:21+00:00): Hi! I intend to revert deleted fences in this one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175649615
mueschel (2025-12-11 12:50:46+00:00): Please check your edits, you added "lacked" tags all over the world.
Anusha Kodi (2026-04-17 03:24:19+00:00): I apologize for the delay three months is a long time for a mistake to go unaddressed.Regarding the tag, it was mistakenly added , but I have now reverted those changes. Thank you for your valuable feedback. I will make sure to be more cautious in future. Thank you.
NeisBot (2025-12-14 07:51:14+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Marketing agency in Ventura and Thousand Oaks"

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-14 14:39:28+00:00): ❌ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175650717
rohieb (2025-12-08 16:13:06+00:00): Danke!

Bitte "erfinde" keine Namen, die in Wirklichkeit Beschreibungen sind. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name
NeisBot (2025-12-14 07:51:15+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Real estate company in Fresno"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-14 14:39:08+00:00): ❌ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175650756
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-24 13:24:06+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam tagging for POI in changeset 184523877

https://osm.org/changeset/184523877
渤海西岸 (2025-12-09 11:43:41+00:00): 你为什么把没有编号的乡道都降级？查不到编号信息不代表不是乡道，你自己找不到他是乡道的来源不要质疑别人知道的信息好不好？
karayama (2025-12-09 12:00:04+00:00): OSM是以现状来评断的地图，而不是叫不叫乡道。比如北京的京通快速路并没有用中国快速路和国道常用的trunk标签，而是用的高速公路使用的motorway标签。你说的那些道路一不满足中国公路法里规定的三级公路标准，二没有任何证据显示这些道路为乡道。大量滦昌乐地区的乡村道路被有些人篡改为“三级道路”才是你应该去质疑的！有一个号称全国纠错的人把唐山主城区内大量老小区内部楼与楼之间的生活性道路篡改为“巷”怎么不去质疑？
karayama (2025-12-09 12:17:37+00:00): 我将近几年滦南、乐亭县政府新建、翻修且符合三级道路标准或链接国省县道或工业区的铺装道路，都新增为“tertiary三级道路”怎么看不到，不肯定？
OSM里那些被个别人士改为明显错误的三级道路才是需要修改并监视的——有些仅仅是因为村里进出的主路比较宽，有些村内主路连贯到其他村了，一些用户就不顾道路建设标准和实际用途改为了“tertiary三级道路”。而我翻遍了各地图也没看到这些道路的乡道及以上标号。所以我改正那些道路，一不符合OSM和中国公路法里的三级公路定义；二查阅不到任何编号和当地政府公示、甚至连最基本的道路命名都没有；三不是市政道路也不链接至任何重要城镇和工业区。如果按道路宽窄或是否主干路就可以随意界定道路等级，那么中国大量村庄的主干路是不是可以都改为“tertiary三级道路”？
另外还有一些编辑者，罔顾事实，把田间路、把村内所有窄路窄巷统统标成residential住宅区道路，还有我上面提到的有人把老小区楼与楼之间、有居民打牌休闲的生活性道路篡改为alley巷，这些才是最需要你修改和监督的。
渤海西岸 (2025-12-09 14:18:53+00:00): 无编号乡道信息出自中国地图出版社2016版的唐山市交通地图册，你在网上当然找不到，而且osm的telegram中国群已经明确说定了中国没有livingstreet，应使用alley，你去问任何一个人都这么认为，标签的使用规则都是不断变化和完善的，如果你非得对这个标签有种莫名的痴迷欢迎你去群里辩论，可是从来没见你去过，如果你能说服众人那自然没人反对你
渤海西岸 (2025-12-09 14:22:57+00:00): 说白了你就是有种精神上的偏执，只允许你自己能查到的信息是正确的，别人能查到你却查不到的就认为是错误的。大多数人都认可的标签都不对，只有你认为的标签定义才是正确的是吧，全世界都在和你逆行是吗？
karayama (2025-12-09 14:29:10+00:00): 2015版的唐山市交通地图册我刚好有买，我怎么没有见到你说的那些乡道？中国地图出版社2016版的唐山市交通地图册如果有那些乡道，你为什么不把那些编号公布出来？还有我说的很清楚，OSM制定的三级公路和中国公路法三级公路的标准就在那里，你说的那些所谓的乡道哪一点符合这两大标准？
karayama (2025-12-09 14:31:58+00:00): telegram中国群已经明确说定了中国没有livingstreet就没有？而且之前的讨论里就说了中国有些小区里的路可以用livingstreet，所以天津济南等大中城市都有编辑者在用。telegram中国群的某一时某几名制定的所谓标准，就等于OSM编辑者必须遵守的准则？中国法律还规定不准事实非法测绘呢，你为什么要测绘并发布私信去骚扰其他测绘者？
karayama (2025-12-09 14:35:46+00:00): 你对我的这些人身攻击，我会记录下来给OSM官方等地方反馈的。我很纳闷，你不去纠正和监督那些滥用标签的人，反倒对真正参考全球案例、遵守OSM准则、遵照当地讯息的我来进行人身攻击。如果你时间真的很充裕，不妨去画画Landuse
karayama (2025-12-09 14:52:17+00:00): livingstreet在OSM上的定义就是The highway=living_street tag is used to tag living streets or other implementations of shared space. These types of roads have lower speed limits and special traffic and parking rules compared to residential streets. 而之前telegram中国群就专门讨论过老旧小区内部一些楼与楼间隔道路就属于这种道路。所以天津、济南、襄阳、唐山等许多城市许多编辑者使用了这个标签，和小区内那些主要出入的主路区分开，既符合OSM上的定义，也区分了人车混行的老旧小区内部道路的分工。而你所谓的用alley标准，直接违背OSM中对于这一标签的定义：An alley or alleyway is a narrow highway=service road usually located between properties to provide access to back gardens, rear entrances, fire exits, and storage areas. Alleys are normally found in urban areas and often run between the rear sides of buildings such as houses and commercial premises.就算是看不懂英文，页面上的配图也很好说明中国老旧小区之间供人和车出入的路，根本不是service=alley那种道路
karayama (2025-12-09 14:58:13+00:00): 我再说一遍：所谓的telegram中国群里某几个人某一时商讨出来的所谓规则，并不是OSM规则——这里是Openstreetmap，不是Telegrammap。其次，中国法律法规和道路建设标准也十分明确，你所谓的乡道根本不符合这些定义。唐山本地人也从来不认为老旧小区里那些楼与楼之间的路是“巷”是什么alley。OSM推崇在地原则，所以我建议你来我们唐山问一问，老旧小区里那些楼与楼之间的路能不能称作巷，能不能称作alley
mueschel (2025-12-09 11:17:00+00:00): Hi,

'toilets:hygienic_cleansing' is not used in any other place. E.g. 
"paper_towel" are usually tagged as 
toilets:hands_drying = paper_towel

Could you check that?
GOwin (2025-12-09 12:15:44+00:00): Your observation is correct and noted. Thanks.
gurglypipe (2025-12-08 12:28:51+00:00): Hiya. If a POI’s website doesn’t resolve any more, that’s a really good hint that the business has closed/changed. Rather than removing the broken link, please take the time to work out what’s changed and update all the details instead — that’s a lot more useful for the map. Otherwise you’re just removing the (often) only sign that a POI is out of date, making it harder for others to spot that it needs updating. Thanks.
MagicPocketbook462 (2025-12-08 17:23:12+00:00): Hello, thank you for your feedback.

Unfortunately I was doing this as remote mapping so am not able to survey on the ground and was doing this as part of maproutlette task.

Personally I don't believe we should leave incorrect data for data consumers to use as reminders but rather utilise `check_date` and notes to call for a survey. 

I understand the reasoning and in future will take the advice on board to add a note or fixme for a survey.
gurglypipe (2025-12-08 17:26:05+00:00): Thanks, adding a note or a fixme would also work. :)
Jan Olieslagers (2025-12-08 11:03:46+00:00): Netjes zo, welbedankt!
NeisBot (2025-12-14 07:51:17+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "St Michaels Neurology clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 17:21:18+00:00): 🔴 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by https://osm.org/changeset/176016160
woodpeck (2025-12-08 12:46:49+00:00): Dear Nguyen Quang 12178, there are a couple of problems with your contributions to OSM:
1. Instead of putting a "." in the changeset comment field, please add a meaningful sentence that describes to other humans what you have done.
2. Also please fill out the source field - you have named schools across the country so it seems unlikely that you simply happen to know them all.
3. When adding a school please use the "amenity=school" tag, not (just) "building=school".
4. The name of the school should be JUST the name of the school. The number of stories or the word "school" do not belong in the name field. Put the number of stories in the "Levels" field which appears just below the name field in the editor.
5. If the school as an interior courtyard like this one, you have to construct a "multipolygon" object in the editor to put the hole into the building.
Thank you for your attention and happy mapping!
UW Maddie (2025-12-08 07:35:27+00:00): If some of the curbs look like they don't match aerial imagery, that's because I used the latest 2025 mapillary images to verify the newly constructed curbs
tanonin (2025-12-08 22:52:57+00:00): Would've been nice to leave it as "demolished"
Regards,
T.
NeisBot (2025-12-14 07:51:19+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Law office in San Diego"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-14 14:38:37+00:00): ❌ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175702031
Frans S (2025-12-19 16:08:36+00:00): Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task.
 * Please accurately outline all buildings.
 * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings .

Keep on mapping!