piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Carto'Cité (2025-11-15 17:31:54+00:00): Bonjour nishboow,

J'ai vu que tu avais transformé ce chemin en piste cyclable :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129604114
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402737883
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/779263536
Généralement les pistes cyclables (highway=cycleway) sont réservé pour les vraies pistes ; c'est à dire avec un panneau C113 ou B22a. Mais dans ce contexte il semblerait qu'il s'agirait d'avantage d'un chemin qui aurait été fermé aux véhicules à moteurs. En l'état, tel que tu l'as décrit, il serait interdit aux piétons par exemple. Je vais le transformé un chemin qui sera accessible aux piétons et en précisant qu'il est également dédié aux cyclistes.

Je pense que l'outil iD que tu as utilisé qui pousse un peu à utiliser highway=cycleway mais c'est généralement inapproprié.

Si tu passes dans le secteur, le mieux est de documenter ce type d'aménagement par des photos dans Panoramax avec l'application Baba par exemple.

Je reste à ta disposition si tu as des questions.

Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
nishboow (2025-11-15 21:28:28+00:00): Bonjour Charles, merci beaucoup pour ton commentaire constructif, je ne pense pas que l'erreur vienne de l'outil iD mais plus de moi car j'ai trouvé que cette section correspondait le plus à ça... 
L'usage d'un highway=path ne me parait pas vraiment adapté car le critère premier de ce tag est que la largeur du chemin ne doit pas permettre le passage d'un véhicule, ce qui n'est pas le cas ici car ce chemin est emprunté par les agriculteurs pour accéder aux parcelles attenantes. Peut être highway=track ?
J'ai une photo de l'aménagement qui a été fait (deux bandes de bitume sur les côtés (pour limiter l'orniérage des engins agricoles) et une bande de terre au milieu, mais je ne sais pas comment la partager (je n'ai pas de localisation GPS).
Carto'Cité (2025-11-16 08:28:04+00:00): Bonjour nishboow,

Merci pour ton retour, c'est vraiment gentil de bien le prendre. Tu as raison pour les path même si les tentatives de définition ont généralement entraîné beaucoup de débats sans consensus clair. Pour la largeur, c'est un critère par défaut qui me parait juste et qu'on peut aussi supplanter en précisant la largeur avec width=. Mais dans cette situation, si les véhicules agricoles l'utilisent, alors oui highway=track est le plus adapté (avec tracktype=grade1 probablement).

Au sujet de ta photo, elle a beaucoup de valeur. Si tu sais où tu l'as prise, tu peux la géolocaliser et inscrire les coordonnées dans les métadonnées. Des outils existe tels que Geosetter mais le meilleur reste JOSM (mon collègue Stéphane a fait de très bons tutoriels pour le faire). Et si tu veux, tu peux aussi me la transmettre pour que je le fasse.

Charles
Mannivu (2025-09-19 05:06:09+00:00): Ciao, grazie per l'aggiunta degli edifici. Tuttavia in casi come questi non serve creare multipoligoni, anzi, sono più difficili da mantenere e complicati da comprendere per i neo utenti. In questi casi un semplice poligono è sufficiente.
aboc (2025-09-19 08:26:40+00:00): 👍
Jrachi (2025-09-19 09:29:37+00:00): Ciao. Ho visto che hai fatto molti aggiornamenti nel parco del Monte Tre Denti, e ti ringrazio.
Vorrei però farti osservare che:
1) i pali segnavia non hanno un nome, Se è presente una tabella località, questa indica il nome della località non il nome del guidepost.
2) Hai cambiato le relazioni di ETOS0050, ETOS005A, ETOS0060 ed ETOS0070.
I dati che hai cambiato sono basati su quello che è stato rilevato poco tempo fa da rilevatori regionali.
3) Hai creato una relazione (), immagino in base alla segnaletica presente, ma non è inserito nella rete regionale, per cui 
rwn:name=Rete Patrimonio Escursionistico Piemonte (RPE)
è sbagliato.

Capisco che "si mappa quello che si vede" ma in questi casi si tratta si segnaletica errata che verrà sostituita o aggiornata in tempi brevi (speriamo).
Ti chiedo di ripristinare le relazioni allo stato precedente, le squadre che andranno a posizionare i nuovi cartelli si baseranno sulle mappe di OSM.

Ivo
ivanbranco (2025-09-19 09:37:34+00:00): > 1) i pali segnavia non hanno un nome, Se è presente una tabella località, questa indica il nome della località non il nome del guidepost.

Allora la documentazione del CAI andrebbe corretta: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI#Luoghi_di_posa

Dal 2016 quella pagina wiki indica il tag name=* come tag "rilevante": <<il nome dovrebbe coincidere con quello del luogo (un passo, una sella) in cui si trova o se è un oggetto particolare conosciuto ad esempio “monumento ai caduti…” altrimenti non si mette>>
Jrachi (2025-09-19 10:20:02+00:00): Vero, la pagina è stat compilata senza chiedere se fosse una pratica comune.
Nella mia zona il nome di un luogo di posa non esiste, si usa la posizione sulla mappa, oppure una indicazione come: "sul colle di Putipù" che non è un nome ma una descrizione.
Il problema è che la tabella località è un oggetto a se stante e non è parte della segnaletica.
Ho già affrontato il problema del name sul guidepost con la SOSEC e spero di riuscire a fare alcuni cambiamenti entro fine anno.

Ivo
cartomatto (2025-09-21 14:27:11+00:00): 1) Jrachi, sulle relazioni, so cosa ho fatto e perchè l'ho fatto, ed è giusto. Sei tu che ti stai basando su info obsolete di oltre un anno fa o più.
Ti chiedo quindi di ripristinare le info che avevo aggiornato anche per non creare confusione agli escursionisti che usino cartografia basata su OSM, Grazie.
2) hai ragione su 005B, svista.
3) il nome del guidepost è assimilabile alla tabella località (non ha senso un "nome" diverso) e indicarlo è utile:
- se si estrapolano i dati tabellari dei guidepost per non avere un'accozzaglia di punti impossibili da distinguere;
- per alcune messe in mappa che renderizzano solo sentieri e guidepost.
4) la tabelle località, a differenza di quanto dici, FA parte della segnaletica, tant'è che è normata tecnicamente nello stesso documento della RP (oltre che dalle linee guida CAI).
cartomatto (2025-09-22 12:21:27+00:00): In assenza di risconti ho provveduto a ripristinare la situazione delle relations aggiornata oltre che corrispondente allo stato di fatto attuale del luogo, che invito ad andare a verificare.
Se hai bisogno di altre info ci sentiamo via msg privato.
jmaspons (2025-11-16 21:04:03+00:00): Hola. El codi wikidata ja era correcte. El nou que has afegit fa referència al municipi (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/348134) i no al poble. Cal revertir el canvi.
Hugoren Martinako (2025-12-11 16:51:15+00:00): Recuperada a https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175811822
MassCartog (2025-09-18 21:54:25+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. If a feature exists on the ground, it is valid data and should not be removed. If it is not open to the public, please use the tagging systems to tag it access=no or access=private. If it's a driveway, you can change the feature type. I made the change for an example of this. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
muzirian (2026-04-22 12:34:09+00:00): Hi please dont change english names on main english name on feature in India to chinese, use chinese name tag for it
canfe (2025-10-19 09:05:29+00:00): Hai dato il nome alla strada Borgata Fornelli.
La strada non ha nome, quello è il nome della frazione.
Che sia presente sui cartelli non vol dire che sia il nome della strada, vol dire che LI' sei in quella frazione e cambia tutto in termine di numerazione dei civici.
Ho ripristinato.
Woazboat (2025-11-20 22:51:40+00:00): Hi, you added a 'hunting lodge' here in this changeset, however I assume you meant a 'hunting stand'. The hunting stand here is already mapped https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4107584812

I've removed the hunting lodge node
jmaspons (2025-09-23 16:40:10+00:00): Hola. Sembla que el canvi de wikidata que has fet és incorrecte. Has afegit el codi que fa referència al municipi (representat per https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/346547). El node que has editat fa referència al poble i el codi wikidata ja era correcte. Cal revertir el canvi.

Salut!
mmorell (2025-09-25 06:49:58+00:00): corregit.  de vegades em lio entre poble i municipi.
Yog Sot (2025-09-18 20:18:38+00:00): :)
Adam Haba (2025-09-18 20:21:28+00:00): Dziękuję za wspólną pracę nad tym projektem :)
Gonéo (2025-09-19 09:12:04+00:00): Tu as vu 4 arceaux sur place ? Parce que l'open-data en indique 5.
NeisBot (2025-09-18 16:03:38+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

Your changeset was commented because it appears to follow a pattern that could be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related.

Could you kindly confirm if your map edits were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #Name #Comment
qwe-qwe (2025-09-18 16:52:55+00:00): Hi, it was really intentional
ichweissallesweilichcoolbin (2025-09-18 16:04:24+00:00): See google maps (google street view). It's called "Im Taubenthal" not "Taubental".
eggie (2025-09-18 17:53:35+00:00): Dag Kono.. Je was nog een klein stukje vergeten om te taggen.

Ik heb het aangepast.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=172121423

MVG
eggie
zabop (2025-09-18 19:04:03+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comments. "a" on its own is not meaningful.
Map_HeRo (2025-10-27 21:28:38+00:00): Hallo schäumchen, Du hast hier mit einem sehr großen CS hunderte von Touringen-Stempelstellen bearbeitet und die Info aus 'ref' als Duplikat nochmals redundant als 'name' erfasst.  Darüber ist die Nummer der Stempelstellen ein weiteres Mal redundant as 'id' erfasst.
Das entspricht so nicht dem üblichen Vorgehen und sollte daher korrigiert werden. Bitte schau diesbezüglich mal in das deutsche Forum, da gibt es eine Diskussion zu diesem Thema: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/name-tags-fur-stempelstellen-von-kommerziellen-tourenanbietern/137087.
Gruß Mikke
bxl-forever_repair (2025-09-18 16:37:21+00:00): ## REVERTED CHANGESET

Hey, this is not a roundabout here.
There are no D5 signs.
Traffic must drive in a circular directions because of D1 signs.

Please do not add "roundabout" tags on any road that vaguely looks circular.  We spent considerable time tagging every road in Brussels over the past years to accurately identify which rules apply in what case.
Dezza (2025-09-18 20:29:29+00:00): Hello! Thanks for updating the details on schools in Lancashire!

Did you mean to put the check_date further back than it already was on Ellel St Johns School? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454054893
confusedbuffalo (2025-09-19 05:19:40+00:00): Ah no, that check date was based off the update date of the official data. I meant to check if it was changing anything it shouldn't have done, I'll watch out for that in future.

I've reverted the check_date to what it was before
Dezza (2025-09-19 08:12:02+00:00): Awesome, thank you :)
bxl-forever (2025-09-18 16:30:42+00:00): Hello,

This may *look* like a roundabout to you but its legal status is *not* a roundabout.

We’ll have to revert your edit.
bxl-forever (2025-09-18 17:20:21+00:00): ## REVERTED CHANGESET

Please do not add roundabout tags when this is legally not a roundabout.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=469653042194831
bxl-forever (2025-09-18 16:44:49+00:00): Sorry but, again, this mechanical edit is completely misguided.

There is no roundabout here.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=591746126626916

Your edit has been reverted.
Frans S (2025-10-10 12:42:04+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not forget to mark a settlement with a mark (hamlet, village etc) as requested in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
bxl-forever_repair (2025-09-18 17:27:04+00:00): ## REVERTED CHANGESET

This is not a roundabout.  Even if traffic drives counter-clockwise here, traffic inside the circle must yield to incoming vehicles.  The situation was correctly mapped before you changed it.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=167567905936872

Sorry, but we’ll have to revert this edit too.
NeisBot (2025-09-18 16:58:39+00:00): Hi mosatef988, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Updated road name and added bus information"
Dimitar155 (2025-09-18 17:24:06+00:00): There is no sign that this parking lot is private. It's not even fenced which is why I put motor_vehicle=destination instead of access on node/10579981222.
rhhs (2025-09-18 17:31:09+00:00): It is fenced now
Dimitar155 (2025-09-18 17:47:09+00:00): That is new information to me. Should've seen your previous changeset before commenting, my bad.
rhhs (2025-09-18 18:03:52+00:00): I should have mapped the fence... and I think there's also access to the parking garage under the building after the lift gate
rhhs (2025-09-19 16:24:29+00:00): added fences and retaining wall now. There's even a Частна собственост sign, I saw today.
Dimitar155 (2025-09-19 16:52:00+00:00): Thanks!
Edelsalami (2025-09-25 16:25:42+00:00): Hallo even666 alias Streetview247, du hast in diesem CS verschiedene Elemente von PLZ-Grenzen gelöscht. Bitte unterlasse das Bearbeiten oder Löschen von Elementen, deren Bedeutung du nicht verstehst. Das wurde dir schon viele Male erklärt. Danke.
IvaLedinščak (2025-09-23 12:13:51+00:00): Reverted because of an unnecessary node creation #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172341138
Taya_S (2025-09-18 17:23:03+00:00): You might want to check `roof:shape=y` on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32844781
Taya_S (2025-09-18 17:27:06+00:00): Actually, `roundabout=yes' itself is also pretty meaningless and even discouraged https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout
Frans S (2025-10-10 12:48:50+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please tag the residential areas with a node and the kind of settlement as requested in the instructions.

Please do not include a courtyard between a few buildings and map it as 1 building
Best regards and keep mapping
KenyaWest (2025-09-18 17:10:14+00:00): Calling member of https://t.me/ruosm community to review these changes
M!dgard (2025-09-18 21:01:21+00:00): Dear Penka457, this is incorrect as it is not a roundabout. It is a circular traffic junction and is already tagged as such.
Edelsalami (2025-09-25 16:33:26+00:00): Hallo even666 alias Streetview247, du hast hier den Grundriss des Gebäudes Caspersbroicher Weg 7 [1]
 fälscherlicherweise nach Süden verlängert und auch den Zigarettenposition falsch, nun mitten auf die Straße, positioniert. Bitte korrigiere das doch zeitnah. Danke.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&way=135411663#map=20/51.1686395/7.0053732
HellMap (2025-09-19 17:07:32+00:00): Kas tieši šeit bija domāts ar `motor_vehicle=designated` vērtību? Varbūt bija domāts `destination`?
gurglypipe (2025-09-18 19:39:35+00:00): Heya, this is a great load of house numbers to add, thanks for taking the time to survey!

I’ve just split up the one building which was accidentally a semi, at 37/38 Aspen Close (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413247767). I had to guess which way round the house numbers are, so if you can remember which way round they are and double check my edit (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172130377) that would be great :)
jdconey (2025-09-21 19:03:52+00:00): Hi, thanks for that. Checked yesterday and you were the right way around. Cheers.
gurglypipe (2025-09-21 22:42:08+00:00): Oh good. Thanks for checking!
bxl-forever (2025-09-18 17:42:33+00:00): Hello,

Can you please tell us the purpose of adding "roundabout=yes" on such roads?

Why do you want this tag?

It is not documented anywhere in the wiki.

Also, did you make sure that this is really a roundabout and not just a circular road?

Thanks in advance.
Edelsalami (2025-09-25 16:39:51+00:00): Hi even666 alias Streetview247, du hast die Grenzen der Gärten und Verlauf des Zaunes nahe der Diepenbrucher Straße 37 willkürlich verändert. Das widerspricht klar dem Verlauf nach Orthophotos. Kannst du bitte erklären, warum diese Änderungen vorgenommen hast? Danke.
even666 (2025-10-05 17:22:39+00:00): Ich habe mir nichts dabei gedacht habe nah ran gezoomt und dann eingetragen
HellMap (2025-09-19 17:05:52+00:00): Šiem vārtiem arī dīvaini sanāk. Velo un kājām ir publiska pieeja. Bet mehāniskie transportlīdzekļi nedrīkst neviens. (Galvenā access un vehicle vērtības sanāk nefigurē, jo ir aizstātas ar konkrētākiem tegiem.) Arī pretī vārti sanāk mehāniskie tr.l. nedrīkst vispār. Varbūt šeit cita doma bija, jo tie izskatās pēc parastiem privātiem vārtiem?

Pieminēšu vēl, ka tu vārtu punktus uzliki uz ietvju un ceļu savienojumiem, kas faktiski nozīmē, ka vārti ir uz ietves. Tos būtu jāliek tikai uz piebraucamā ceļa.
user_23259244 (2025-09-19 17:57:04+00:00): Izlaboju, tur jau bija vārti, bet ar access nebija ok. Izlaboju!
Andrea Musuruane (2025-09-20 16:03:15+00:00): This is clearly wrong. Q3718648 is Ecomuseo del Biellese which is composed of 15 smaller museums. None of them is here. BR, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172125920
kabelhaai (2025-09-18 17:51:02+00:00): Please stop using the tag roundabout=yes https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout
stasiu512 (2025-09-22 11:10:54+00:00): Cześć, coś tu jest nie tak - te dwie linie na siebie nachodzą https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017456904
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1026189209
stasiu512 (2025-09-22 11:32:58+00:00): Poprawiłem, zaraz ułożę też relacje autobusowe:)
Szymson (2025-09-22 11:48:59+00:00): Dzięki :D
Monstrofil (2025-10-05 16:42:52+00:00): Чи не могли б ви пояснити причину перейменування вул. Комарова?

Мапер до вас послався на офіційний перелік перейменувань:
https://dnl.dn.ua/news/ofitsiyno-novi-nazvi-vulits-u-druzhkivtsi_196526
Andrea Musuruane (2025-09-20 16:07:06+00:00): This is also wrong. Q30031492 is Valle Mosso, chief town of the homonym municipality. So you should have tagged the place and not the boundary. But, Valle Mosso is no longer a municipality. BR, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172126191
Andrea Musuruane (2025-10-16 09:37:50+00:00): Reverted wrong wikidata tags

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173356344
osmviborg (2025-09-18 17:59:46+00:00): Perfekt 👌
rotagate (2025-09-18 18:02:01+00:00): Tak for hjælpen! Beklager rodet. :)
Dodko (2025-10-06 13:28:15+00:00): Ak je v budove adresa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71544819 netreba ju dávať duplicitne aj do POI bodu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13153382223/history
eggie (2025-09-18 19:45:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
geo-d (2025-09-18 18:08:49+00:00): POI aktualisiert mit Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172126843
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-24 17:06:15+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173727868
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-24 17:07:51+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173727926
Andrea Musuruane (2025-09-20 16:08:38+00:00): This is wrong too. Q30022132 is Alice Superiore, chief town of the homonym municipality. So you should have tagged the place and not the boundary. But, Alice Superiore is no longer a municipality. BR, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172127279
Andrea Musuruane (2025-10-16 09:38:26+00:00): Reverted wrong wikidata tags

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173356387
Andrea Musuruane (2025-09-20 16:10:10+00:00): This is wrong too. Q30026763 is Lugnacco, chief town of the homonym municipality. So you should have tagged the place and not the boundary. But Lugnacco is no longer a municipality. BR, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172127344
Andrea Musuruane (2025-10-16 09:38:14+00:00): Reverted wrong wikidata tags

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173356378
MassCartog (2025-09-18 21:46:36+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Roads that are private are still valid features on OSM. Please use the OSM tagging system if they are not open to the public with access=private, or access=no. You can even place gate nodes where they exist on the ground. I've restored the roads so they can be tagged correctly.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
Truchin (2025-10-03 19:37:45+00:00): Bonjour Xandrex’

Merci pour cette contribution mais du coup il faudrait aussi supprimer les pistes cyclables du way principal car ça fait doublon.

Thomas
Xandrex (2025-10-05 13:59:09+00:00): ok, fait.
Merci du signalement, Thomas!
Andrea Musuruane (2025-09-20 16:16:40+00:00): Q113305538 is a town hall. This is a tennis pitch!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172127627
eggie (2025-09-18 20:18:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Allroads (2025-09-19 10:44:02+00:00): Hoi Karel,

Je past hier de weg aan, er staan daar geen verkeersborden met verboden.  C borden. Dus *=no kan niet.
Er stond al use_sidepath op vanwege de G12a langs de Domineesweg,
Bepalend is of je ergens kan komen hoe de toevoerwegen zijn getagd. C borden hebben een werking tot de volgende kruising, omdat keren op de weg is toegestaan, zetten we dat veelal op een klein stuk.
Het is daar een aparte situatie. Vooral bij Domineesweg 1, je mag namelijk kan namelijk met een fiets breder dan 75 cm vanaf de Eggenstraat naar Donimeesweg 1 fietsen. Maar niet terug vanwege de C15 aldaar. Kijk ook naar dat er al forward en backward tags op staan.
Dat conflicteerd nu.

use_sidepath, heeft voor de gewone fietser een werking als no, juist om het verschil te maken is use_sidepath ontwikkeld.

Wat betreft horse is er helemaal niks geregeld, waarom zouden die, daar niet mogen komen?


Groeten Allroads.

https://wegkenmerken.ndw.nu/verkeersborden?identifier=,5.708013066674999,52.64384505212732
RicoElectrico (2025-09-22 07:51:16+00:00): Cześć, proszę o powstrzymanie się przed zmianą Piły z town na city w wojnie edycyjnej. Konsensus jest w wątku na forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/town-vs-city-w-polsce/123756/28
voltairovicz (2025-09-23 07:06:32+00:00): Chyba Piła nigdy nie doczeka się city, coś tak czuje, obecna dyskusja i zdanie użytkowników w ankiecie mówi, że zostaje jak jest
anonimowy0000 (2025-09-25 15:04:59+00:00): Dlaczego Piła mając 75 tys. mieszkańców ma status miasteczko, a Leszno mając 50 tys. mieszkańców ma miasto?
voltairovicz (2025-09-27 17:56:36+00:00): Bo umownie zostało przyjęte, że status city mają w osm miasta, które są na prawie powiatu, Piła mimo swojej wielkości jest właśnie jednym z największych miast w Polsce, którego tego statusu nie przyjęły. Też uważam, że powinna być i bardziej powinniśmy patrzeć na liczbę ludności, ale na ten moment byłaby to decyzja bardzo umowna i zakładałaby wyjątek
mtmail (2025-09-20 21:00:46+00:00): I'll restore the state (relation 2846872), it has tags
Joachim_0 (2025-09-20 21:08:13+00:00): Acknowledged.  Thanks
mtmail (2025-09-20 21:15:04+00:00): That was a strange change. Maybe JOSM loaded parent relations of the road network (relation 3322090)? I found it in a report about missing states. Though I think https://nightwatch.openstreetmap.si/ (run by people working for Bing Maps) would've noticed it, too, eventually.
All the best