piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-18 21:32:51+00:00): @masoudghorbany
We cannot ignore OSM rules for personal gain and interest.
In change set 178719429 you have drawn a building boundary that should be registered with a common wall, separate from the adjacent building. Registering the building boundary is good, but it should be according to OSM rules and instructions.
In change set 178720490 you have made a big change to the whole country and edited 10 stores from different regions of the country in the name tag for the first time, violating the rules.
In the following change sets, you made changes to the name tag that were incorrect and were told the correct method in each, but you still repeated the same incorrect edits:
178670826, 178671058, 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 178672902, 178672856, 178672902, 178672819, 178668353, 178672325, 178670726, 178670646, 178670548, 178670427, 178670308, 178670112 , 178669930, 178707284, 178721809, 178719611, 178720632, 178720490
, 178713807, 178713572, 178713486
Stop this process and register and edit according to the rules.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-18 21:35:47+00:00): @masoudghorbany
The reason for removing the boundary here is that
in change set 178713486 and 178713486 you have incorrectly registered a building with a common wall for the umpteenth time. You have registered a building that is related to only one business with a boundary and also with a node repeatedly. This is not according to OSM rules. Register and edit according to the rules. I have deleted the boundary in this case, if you still want to register the boundary, register it correctly. Incorrect registrations in large numbers make it difficult for other local editors.
marc__marc (2026-02-20 16:55:36+00:00): 

Bonjour,
Je suis content de constater que vous utilisez et améliorer le projet.

Cependant quand un sentier vient d'être supprimé sur le terrain, je vous conseille de ne pas l'effacer dans OpenStreetMap mais de lui ajouter un cycle de vie par ex was:highway=path + end_date=2026-02 + note=sentier détruit sur le terrain ou autre texte qui convient.

cela évite que le contributeur suivant, ne voyant plus l'objet, rajoute le tracé soit à partir de l'imagerie satellite soit à partir de trace de trajet (par ex Strava)

Si le sentier n'est pas supprimé dans sa totalité comme cela semble être le cas ici, il suffit de d'abord le couper pour appliquer le prefixe was: (en bas du panneau de gauche dans l'éditeur web) sur le tronçon concerné

Cordialement,
Marc
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-18 21:19:38+00:00): @masoudghorbany
In change set 178713486 you have incorrectly registered a building with a common wall for the umpteenth time. You have registered a building that is related to only one business with a boundary and also with a node repeatedly. This is not according to OSM rules. Register and edit according to the rules. I have deleted the boundary in this case, if you still want to register the boundary, register it correctly. Incorrect registrations in large numbers make it difficult for other local editors.
Udarian (2026-02-18 17:46:03+00:00): what does addr:country=Sunrise even mean????

Happy mapping,
Udar.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-18 20:58:58+00:00): @masoudghorbany
You have incompleted the name of the operator in changeset/178673320
In change set 178719429 you have drawn a building area as an island and separate from the adjacent building. It is good to record the building area, but it must be according to OSM rules and instructions.
In change set 178720490 you have made a major change to the entire country and have edited 10 stores from different regions of the country in the name tag for the first time, contrary to the rules.
. Even though I had modified the name tag, you again changed the changeset to 178670826, 178671058, 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 178672902, 178672856, 178672902, 178672819, 178668353, 178672325, 178670726, 178670646, 178670548, 178670427, 178670308, 178670112 , 178669930, 178707284, 178721809, 178719611, 178720632, 178720490
, 178713807
flex16 (2026-02-18 10:14:33+00:00): Ich bin mir eigentlich sicher, dass dieses rote Schild nur an Enden von Einbahnstraßen steht. Wenn hier ein Einbahnstraßenschild fehlt, gehe ich davon aus, dass das irgendwie verschwunden/kaputt gegangen ist. Würde tendenziell mal bei Gemeinde nachfragen oder so
m_fuhrmann (2026-02-18 11:30:46+00:00): Schau mal hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:oneway#Unechte_Einbahnstra%C3%9Fen

Es gibt sie. Die Kanalstraße in Fulda ist auch so eine.
NeisBot (2026-02-18 09:12:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12853510434 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Iron works factory"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-26 17:33:09+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178734088
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-04 06:29:15+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13575290890/history has material = 37 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
Lukaslgz (2026-04-04 10:26:30+00:00): Thank you for the feedback. I have corrected the mix-up regarding material and direction.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-04 18:31:26+00:00): thanks for a fix!
Vis_M (2026-02-19 16:08:22+00:00): What source? You are lying. You are ruining this community driven project. STOP!
NeisBot (2026-02-18 09:33:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/10214716435 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Lasergravorwerkstatt"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und faktischere Version deines Textes lauten: "Lasergravorwerkstatt"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-26 17:33:11+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179095488
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
user_21736114 (2026-03-18 04:17:06+00:00): Доброго Дня 
ти замінив natural=grassland на farmland
це неправильно 
Раніше ця територія була розплідником дерев Держлісгоспу- зараз ця територія пустуюча галявина трави
Тому  я повертаю natural=grassland
Rainero (2026-03-15 09:06:17+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179888145
(unzulässige Quelle)
Rainero (2026-03-16 18:29:09+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179965592
(unzulässige Quelle)
Rainero (2026-03-16 18:32:21+00:00): Der erste Kommentar war richtig!
NeisBot (2026-02-18 09:45:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/613190077 v9 | 4 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178716428
NeisBot (2026-02-18 09:45:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13575362700 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Therapy center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-26 17:33:14+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179095491
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
eggie (2026-02-18 10:23:51+00:00): Dag Magic..
Je info samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
name:nl verwijderd
Gr eggie
Comino (2026-02-18 21:17:49+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
eggie (2026-02-18 10:25:47+00:00): Beste Magic.. Die adressen zijn er al. De truc is om op een bestaande adresnode bij te taggen. Ik heb de info samengevoegd. Geen spaties in postcodes maken.

MVG
eggie
Paweł_M (2026-02-18 17:16:08+00:00): Dzięki, jakoś mi to umknęło wczoraj
eggie (2026-02-18 10:43:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  OSM editors zijn niet egschikt om iets uit te proberen, want zodra je uploadt komr je Proefedit ook daadwerkelijk in OSM terecht. In dit geval allemaal opgeplakte wegen.
Ik heb je proef teruggedraaid. Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=178718325
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-18 11:07:49+00:00): reverted by changeset #178719082
eggie (2026-02-18 10:46:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Lijkt me oke zo. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
⇄ john paul jones & gringo (2026-04-25 09:33:58+00:00): Hi Adam,
I was just wondering why you have chosen to change 'path' to 'cycleway' here? 
I believe it was tagged correctly as wiki indicates, does it perhaps render differently as cycleway?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_the_United_Kingdom#956 
refers
Adam Edwards (2026-06-02 08:37:50+00:00): My apologies for the slow response.  I have been away for 2 months on a long cycle ride to Spain via France.  The footway here is signed as shared use cycling and walking with the blue sign shown at #956 at the link you sent.  So making it a cycleway is the classic tagging style which I had assumed is correct?  For me a path is a much vaguer term and I often find people marking paths as yes for cycling even when there is no legal permission for this to happen.  Happy to change this back if path is better in this case.
⇄ john paul jones & gringo (2026-06-03 09:20:09+00:00): That sounds fun!
There's no problem with cycleway, that's fine. Because it is one. It's a shared facility as signed on the ground. 
Path's and Footway's when combined with Cycleways are rendered differently and again differently by different sites. There seems to be no common theme, which I find annoying and difficult to follow. 
So I was enquiring as to why you changed what was supposed to be one correct way to another correct way of tagging, if that makes sense. 
I was curious.
Syl (2026-02-19 15:33:50+00:00): Bonjour, le nom sert seulement si l'objet en a un, " Écran numérique - vitrine" serait plutôt à ajouter comme description.
GrabTH_Bulakorn (2026-02-18 10:46:39+00:00): Change: Set one-way direction. #grabosm
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-18 20:43:55+00:00): User @masoudghorbany
It is good that you have specified the perimeter of a building. But these buildings are attached to each other and we should not draw them with separate lines. Also, they are drawn either with a point or as a perimeter. Both are not correct. The perimeter and the node in its center are used for villages.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-18 19:07:36+00:00): @masoudghorbany
You have committed the following change sets incorrectly and have broken the name tag multiple times after it was fixed. Stop doing this.
178670826, 178671058, 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 178672902, 178672856, 178672902, 178672819, 178668353, 178672325, 178670726, 178670646, 178670548, 178670427, 178670308, 178670112 , 178669930, 178707284
TrickyFoxy (2026-02-23 01:28:53+00:00): 1. Во-первых не нужно рисовать под какие-то приложения, которые что-то не умеют делать правильно.
2. Во-вторых, ваши действия не помогут, потому что у санотория нет адреса
TrickyFoxy (2026-02-23 01:32:54+00:00): а, вы его добавили. В любом случае не нужно ради такого двигать границы санотория
NeisBot (2026-02-18 11:00:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/506513104 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Padel courts"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-26 17:33:15+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178720671
RushMM (2026-02-18 19:11:57+00:00): Hi thanks for adding the houses, looks good to me. Just a quick tip, when you've got the houses selected, if you click "square all corners" or press q on the keyboard, it'll make the building corners right angles so it'll look nicer.
Thanks for adding to the map!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178719897
cartomatto (2026-02-20 10:31:13+00:00): @robertoq
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12967845/history/3#versions-navigation-active-page-item
la linea con ruolo outer della relazione era una linea senza tag wood, ma con indicazione leaftype. Semplicemente ho tolto leaftype dalla linea e l'ho messo nella relazione.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12967845/history/4#versions-navigation-active-page-item
NeisBot (2026-02-18 11:12:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 20 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/879787577 v2 | 13 crossings
https://osm.org/way/372020347 v6 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1568003429 v4
https://osm.org/node/3755593008 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178720433
NeisReview (2026-02-26 17:33:25+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178753889
https://osm.org/changeset/178766637
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-18 19:21:29+00:00): شما در این change set به یک باره در 10 کسب و کار مختلف در سراسر کشور ایران، تغییرات نادرست و خلاف قوانین OSM ایجاد کرده اید. در آنها تگ نام را که در طی دو هفته گذشته بارها اصلاح شده، خراب کرده اید. change set های دیگری که در این مدت خراب کردید به شرح زیر است:
178670826, 178671058, 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 178672902, 178672856, 178672902, 178672819, 178668353, 178672325, 178670726, 178670646, 178670548, 178670427, 178670308, 178670112 , 178669930, 178707284, 178721809, 178719611, 178720632
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-18 19:22:36+00:00): In this change set, you have made incorrect changes that violate OSM rules to 10 different businesses across Iran at once. In them, you have broken the name tag that has been modified many times over the past two weeks. Other changesets you broke during this time are as follows:
178670826, 178671058, 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 178672902, 178672856, 178672902, 178672819, 178668353, 178672325, 178670726, 178670646, 178670548, 178670427, 178670308, 178670112 , 178669930, 178707284, 178721809, 178719611, 178720632
masoudghorbani (2026-02-19 11:34:43+00:00): این همه جا، مکان، شغل، رستوران و ... توی ایران وجود داره، من نمیدونم مشکل شما با این ۲۲ مکان چیه ؟
خلاف قوانین هست ؟ یعنی شما انقدر که در اینجا قانونمند هستی در زندگی هم هستی ؟
بی خیال این کتابشهر بشید لطفا
حتما یه مساله ای هست که من اینجوری انجام میدم
ممنون میشم دیگه ویرایش نکنید
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-19 15:18:50+00:00): @masoudghorbany‏
Proper registration is important. Your circumstances may be unique, but the rules are designed to apply equally to everyone. If we make an exception for one person, it will not be fair to everyone else. I hope you understand that following the rules is in everyone's best interest.
masoudghorbani (2026-02-19 16:34:10+00:00): شما که صاحب یا نماینده OSM نیستید، یا مجری اجرای قانون که نیستید، یکی مثل من و دیگران هستید .
به جاهای دیگه برسید .
نه خودتونو اذیت کنید، نه من .
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-19 19:53:02+00:00): @masoudghorbany‏
If you continue to make incorrect edits, all incorrect edits will be reverted and you will be reported. Stop making mistakes.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-18 19:14:28+00:00): @masoudghorbany
You have included several tags in the name tag in the following change sets, which is incorrect. In addition to the fact that you have been explained that this type of editing is incorrect, you still continue.
178670826, 178671058, 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 178672902, 178672856, 178672902, 178672819, 178668353, 178672325, 178670726, 178670646, 178670548, 178670427, 178670308, 178670112 , 178669930, 178707284, 178721809, 178719611, 178720632
GiovanniPen (2026-02-18 14:07:49+00:00): please make smaller changeset
bxl-forever (2026-02-18 14:40:12+00:00): This changeset updated 3 nodes: one in the Canary Islands, one in Berlin, and one in Croatia.  That should have been uploaded as three separate changes instead of one.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Aethonatic (2026-02-18 19:13:49+00:00): I noticed that you added "(closed for construction)" to the name key of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9315056822. Is this mentioned construction temporary? If so, it should not be included on OpenStreetMap. Regardless, "name" should not be used for descriptions, please use the description key for that. Though, you can use other tags to indicate long-term construction works.
mls3000 (2026-02-19 18:20:04+00:00): Sorry, I din't realize that OrganicMaps would commit all changes I once tried to make through the app before I had an account.
NeisBot (2026-02-18 11:30:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13575512541 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Law office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-26 17:33:15+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178982419
NeisBot (2026-02-18 11:42:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13575554185 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Construction company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-26 17:33:15+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/178728301
TomN1 (2026-02-20 20:24:27+00:00): Ihan mielenkiinnosta, minkä lähteen pohjalta muutat bussipysäkkinodejen nimiä? Ainakaan Digiroad-aineiston/Jouko-reittioppaan kanssa muuttamasi nimet eivät aina vaikuta täsmäävän.
Taya_S (2026-02-18 14:18:14+00:00): It seems you added a node located at 0.00, 0.00 in this changeset. You might want to check whether everything went alright.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13575834376
notmyproblem1 (2026-02-18 21:34:10+00:00): want to contribute sooo bad to this maproulette, but can't find anywhere a link...
Palary (2026-02-19 14:17:31+00:00): Hi notmyproblem1, thank you for your interest in the challenges. It is an internal project that is not publicly discoverable, but I will forward your request to the project manager and discuss.

Meanwhile, I can direct you to similar challenges in South Korea, Indonesia, and Pakistan, if you are interested: 

https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/54166

https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/54171

https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/54190
mavl (2026-02-19 13:33:30+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок меняет статус дороги на highway=track. Дороги highway=track - это лесные и полевые дороги. Эта дорога не лесная и не полевая. Проходимость дороги не влияет на её статус.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway
Taya_S (2026-02-18 12:05:48+00:00): You should maybe explain your changes in the " Please explain your changes here:" part of your changeset description.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-04 19:26:12+00:00): Hello!

You used
railway:turnout_side=leftr
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13575952486/history

Have you maybe meant
railway:turnout_side=left
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
de24000 (2026-04-05 07:15:13+00:00): Hi, indeed this is a typo. I will fix it later today. Thanks for pointing it out. Have a great day.
karr4s (2026-03-09 20:10:47+00:00): Honfleur - Rue de la République
Le magasin "M.C.Y Store" a été remplacé par "Léon" en 2016 (POI déjà présent). J'ai supprimé le POI et ajouté le "old_name" sur celui qui était déjà créé.
NeisBot (2026-02-18 12:51:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13576062131 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Nakliyat şirketi"
---
Örneğin metnin daha tarafsız ve gerçek bir versiyonu şöyle olabilir: "Nakliyat şirketi"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-26 17:33:16+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179095492
(Delete all added tags)
finn-hound (2026-02-23 18:47:44+00:00): Hi. Is construction complete on the houses too? If so, I'll map this area as landuse=residential. Thank you!