piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-29 22:52:32+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 148459786, 148858789, 148865779, 148894327, 149057513, 149058295, 149069167, 149091472, 149092091, 149092831, 149094566, 149146978, 149174174, 149175477, 149176748, 149185515, 149236939, 149238808, 149245686, 149395549, 149396005, 149480674, 149481214, 149572708, 149573347, 149574986, 149593451, 149593565, 149593646, 149616735, 149618156, 149734849, 149735254, 149735509, 149735865, 149753104, 149835096, 149849802, 149915442, 149918553, 149919284, 149920121, 149928181, 149928700, 149929134, 149929502, 149929602, 149929896, 149930349, 149930801, 149930978, 149931153, 149931332, 149944393, 149945098, 149945476, 149945903, 149946053, 149962222, 149999033, 149999378, 149999532, 150035860, 150036986, 150037786, 150039418, 150042086, 150059606, 150082418, 150125228, 150126170, 150126893, 150127893, 150128205, 150133867, 150133940, 150136313, 150137967, 150139864, 150141514, 150169227, 150170021, 150170663, 150218382, 150218785, 150220327, 150220794, 150221248, 150221620, 150228006, 150229378, 150263421, 150263587, 150263715, 150265010, 150265625, 150303265, 150304118, 150304751, 150352747, 150559409, 150559468, 150559641, 150559777, 150559878, 150578033, 150578735, 150585045, 150585611, 150586144, 150587863, 150588777, 150592983, 150614272, 150659802, 150662018, 150662897, 150670626, 150671333, 150671998, 150677766, 150678630, 150678882, 150679083, 150679393, 150680093, 150680404.
tastrax (2024-04-30 07:55:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Paul Connelly (2024-04-30 22:54:12+00:00): Thanks for the edit and letting me know about the guidelines. Cheers
ivanbranco (2024-04-30 09:35:23+00:00): Please do not vandalize the map adding fake element, such as a coastline in this case.

If you wish to contribute to OpenStreetMap in a productive way, you can start by reading this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
ivanbranco (2024-04-30 09:36:26+00:00): Por favor, no vandalices el mapa añadiendo elementos falsos, como una línea de costa en este caso.

Si deseas contribuir a OpenStreetMap de forma productiva, puedes empezar leyendo esto: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-30 23:53:53+00:00): more duplications. Please be careful
fortera_au (2024-04-30 00:40:00+00:00): There's conflicting tagging of abandoned:highway=service and highway=service on this, is this still a current service road? If so, the abandoned:highway tag should be removed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150685084
fortera_au (2024-04-30 00:33:39+00:00): Hi, surface=ground doesn't appear to be widely used, I'd suggest surface=unpaved if you know it's unpaved but aren't sure how.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150685207
MxxCon (2024-05-03 18:45:52+00:00): Residents? This is not not a public park?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150685238
Gabe DeFreitas (2024-05-03 18:57:39+00:00): Hi, yes this is a village park, but it is only open to residents of the village. I wasn't entirely sure what tag to use for the situation, access="private" did not seem right to me since it's owned by the local government. Here's some background info https://historicpelham.blogspot.com/2015/07/more-on-restriction-of-shore-park-to.html
fortera_au (2024-04-30 01:36:25+00:00): Hi, why has this been changed to an unclassified road if it's a driveway, especially with the service=driveway tag left on it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150685451
fortera_au (2024-04-30 01:37:23+00:00): This is definitely a driveway and should be highway=service.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150685783
fortera_au (2024-04-30 01:37:53+00:00): Service roads are highway=service, not highway=unclassified. Please look at and respond to changeset comments left on almost all your changesets.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150685809
MxxCon (2024-05-03 18:49:24+00:00): Hello.
Those opening_hours you entered look wrong...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150685827
MxxCon (2024-05-03 18:51:48+00:00): Hello.
Rather than completely deleting a closed biz, it's much better to use lifecycle prefix tags as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix. Doing that not only allows that address to still be searchable and routable, but it also preserves history of this object which can be referred to in the future, if there's ever a need.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150685882
Enock4seth (2024-04-30 05:49:57+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for mapping. Unfortunately there is no motorway here.

Please can you get to familiarise yourself with OSM a bit more before making any further changes?

Here is one resource for getting started https://learnosm.org/en/

I am fixing this change. 

Happy mapping!
WoodWoseWulf (2024-04-30 21:36:46+00:00): Hello - the beach you've added here seems a little strange, more like the bank of the creek, if it's even that. What are you trying to add here?
vicente lopez 2021 (2024-05-01 00:07:43+00:00): https://elacontecer.com.uy/2024/03/14/doble-via-de-ruta-5-se-completo-el-tramo-durazno-sarandi-grande/
Frans S (2024-05-06 12:22:29+00:00): Hello . Thanks for mapping.
Please do not connect nodes of buildings to other buildings or roads.
Best regards
Frans S (2024-05-06 12:24:19+00:00): And, please square your mapped buildings with the Q key.
Best regards
WoodWoseWulf (2024-04-30 21:25:00+00:00): Hello, you changed the entirety of Gold Hill Family Beach Park to a beach but also added a beach area. I've set the park back to a park because otherwise you're just duplicating the same feature and removing another.
TibiaMariner (2024-05-01 15:28:20+00:00): Can you explain that a little more? I didn't change anything. I only adjusted the border some along the water edge. What was there is how it was before before I made any edits.
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-01 20:42:17+00:00): Thanks for your reply. You can see the tagging on version 6 here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440431477/history
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-01 20:49:21+00:00): I also see that you've re-added the beach tag to the entire park as well as having it on the beach area. Again, this is inaccurate.
TibiaMariner (2024-05-03 20:42:17+00:00): I'm learning as I go, and it sounds like it was a tad messy before I started shaping it better. The overlapping areas, the lake section etc. I didn't edit those existing parts. So is there any significant difference to cutting out the sand bar as opposed to tagging the park area as "beach"? It sounds like either or would be fine, but the issue was that both had been done? The entire park marked and tagged as beach or creating a separate (non-overlapping) area for the beach would be best, correct? Just want your thoughts so I can edit thing more accurately.
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-03 21:08:53+00:00): "So is there any significant difference to cutting out the sand bar as opposed to tagging the park area as "beach"?"

Marking the whole park as a beach is inaccurate because the whole park is not a beach. It's akin mapping an entire school as a cafeteria just because it has a cafeteria somewhere on the grounds.

OSM Generally works on the idea of "One feature, one OSM element"

You've also extended the beach down beyond where it actually is. Even on very, very current imagery, the beach does not extend as far as you have moved it. Can you explain why you are doing this? Scrub going almost the whole way up to the river bank.
TibiaMariner (2024-05-03 21:56:42+00:00): That part made sense and was adjusted already.

The beach was adjusted to match where I walked the sandbar the other day. Visually, it looks small from above but it extends further along where greenery is present atop it. The sand was not all clear and open.
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-03 22:19:25+00:00): "That part made sense and was adjusted already."

No, it wasn't adjusted already. I fixed it. - see the history: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440431477/history

If the sand is not all clear and open, it's probably not a beach, it's just sandy substrate covered in grass and scrub along a river bank. The definition of a beach is pretty clear. The imagery here is good enough to identify individual plants and clearly see the border of the actual beach area.
TibiaMariner (2024-05-03 22:40:22+00:00): As I mentioned, I'm learning as we discuss. You previously adjusted the park tag, which is why I said it was "adjusted already". I made no claim to who made the adjustment, only that it had been done.

I'm not sure if there's a way to see the original layout, but based on the original beach, I was merely making adjustments based on what was in place and what I saw in person. The original beach was thicker and reached up into the shrubbery some. I have no issue with someone seeing it differently and marking it smaller based on the harsh edge lines from the above view. My initial edits were when I was adding the river area and I was tidying up the preexisting beach area.
WoodWoseWulf (2024-04-30 21:42:13+00:00): I'm not seeing what makes the beach you've added here a beach either, it looks like the vegetation line goes almost right up to the banks of Lake Quinsigamond
Venoltar (2025-12-01 03:41:32+00:00): Whinstanes (125679581)  This is not a recognised suburb of Brisbane, and has not been for some time now.
This location is now split between the 4 surrounding suburbs centred roughly around the the corner of Mordant Street and Lamington Avenue.
NW is Ascot, NE is Pinkenba, SW is Hamilton and SE is Eagle Farm.
The Brisbane City Council have an online suburb map that provides accurate borders.
TheSwavu (2025-12-01 10:31:48+00:00): Hi, it is tagged as place=neighbourhood which is part of a suburb: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=neighbourhood so I would not expect to see it on a list of suburbs.
Jack Boschert (2025-12-02 00:48:26+00:00): Hi Venoltar, I am not a local expert, but as TheSwavu mentioned I think the tagging of Whinstanes as place=neighbourhood is consistent with the OSM Wiki definition. Especially in the context of Brisbane where there are commonly known neighbourhood names from early land sales that still exist within formal suburb boundaries (eg. Merthyr, Ithaca, Mayne, Hill End, Rosalie).
fortera_au (2024-04-30 06:56:17+00:00): Hi, you've created this restaurant node almost on top of a road. Is this meant to be on the building next to the carpark slightly east?
真中あお (2024-05-01 19:30:14+00:00): 首先，欢迎萌新！
注意到您请求了他人审阅您的编辑。需要指出的是，您这几次编辑确实还存在一些问题，我一并在这里说了：
1.您在绘制新路靠近旧路的区域时将新路的一个节点吸附到旧路上了。这在osm数据库中看来，就是这两条路有路口相通，会导致导航出错。
2.您在绘制新路时整个删掉了地图上原有的路径。这导致有效数据被删了，是不恰当的。正确的做法是先在旧路的节点上右键剪切旧路，就能单独删去新路工程埋没的部分，保留旧路未受影响的部分。然后按照实际情况是否相通，把旧路和新路相接或保留断头路。
3.不知道名称的道路不需要填写“道路”这种并非其名的描述。把名称留空亦可。
4.如果把曲线画得更细致——比如90°弯用三到四个点，成图会大为美观。
上述问题我已经修正了（https://osmcha.org/changesets/150764959）。如果您将来的编辑中有困惑，可以多阅读wiki.openstreetmap.org，还可以按欢迎信中的联络方式加入osm中国的群组，与其他编辑者共同交流~
大家都是从陌生到熟练的。相信您一回生二回熟，有了经验就会越来越轻车熟路了，体会到OSM的更多乐趣与价值。期待您为osm做出更多贡献~
MxxCon (2024-05-03 18:56:10+00:00): Shold this be addr:housename= or just name= tag? I could be wrong, but I don't think "The Blue Building" would be part of an address you would write on a letter...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150688164
John Gilmore (2024-05-03 19:26:43+00:00): I don't know what the correct tagging conventions are.  New York City has thousands of ordinary residential or commercial buildings that have their own names, such as "The Dakota" or "The Flatiron Building".  I just used the StreetComplete menu to add the locally used name for this building, but the app might be picking the wrong tag for this purpose.
Minh Nguyen (2024-05-02 22:13:17+00:00): These changes appear to have been undone in changeset 150739234 due to validation warnings. The available background layers don’t show any shift in the roads like what you mapped. Can you provide more context? Did the shift take place very recently?
Pinstall (2024-05-02 22:21:09+00:00): Yes. The changes took place recently, within the last few weeks.
Minh Nguyen (2024-05-02 22:27:53+00:00): OK, in that case, you’ll have to redo the changes manually. This time, try to keep the roads from overlapping or crossing each other where there isn’t an intersection. Your changeset comment can say that the change took place recently, so other mappers know not to trust the aerial imagery too much.
rempshaener (2024-04-30 20:18:12+00:00): Hallo,
zu deinen Anpassungen habe ich folgende Anmerkungen:

Auf dem Teilstück https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26423318 ist das Vz 238 ausgewiesen, dazu passt aber nicht das „path“.
Das Teilstück https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1278390424 ist jetzt vollständig gesperrt.
Das Teilstück https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1278390423 ist gesperrt.

Die Schilder https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11868126593 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11868126592 haben keinerlei Funktionen, da sie nicht mit Wegen verbunden sind.

Ich sehe gerade wenig Chancen, das einigermaßen gerade zu ziehen, ich würde die Änderungen daher gerne zurückdrehen. Ich hoffe, das ist okay.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2024-06-26 19:25:01+00:00): angepasst mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153217902
AndresDuhour (2024-04-30 17:25:33+00:00): Hola! quería consultar por la razón para cambiar la categoría de trunk a primary.
En la wiki de Argentina están detalladas las rutas clasificadas como trunk por provincia y se establecieron los criterios de clasificación en base a un debate en la comunidad. Le envío el link para referencia:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina/V%C3%ADas_de_circulaci%C3%B3n#Conexi%C3%B3n_de_localidades_de_m%C3%A1s_de_100.000_habitantes
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-19 10:39:52+00:00): Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here.
ssummoner1 (2024-04-30 07:49:32+00:00): Köszönöm!

Ezt elfelejtettem!
NeisBot (2024-04-30 06:04:03+00:00): Hello lagaribey, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
ElliottPlack (2024-05-04 11:00:39+00:00): This is an unacceptable changeset comment. Did you read the article I posted on your block? https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15408
JezCrow (2024-04-30 16:30:22+00:00): Hi Murrumbidgee, this highway you have added no longer exists. If you you look at the more recent Esri World Imagery here you will see the junction has been altered.
Kind regards,
Jez
Murrumbidgee (2024-05-03 03:18:58+00:00): Hi JezCrow, Thanks for the feedback. I have corrected the data as per Esri world Imagery.
zstadler (2025-04-25 06:08:45+00:00): הי,

כשיש דרך עפר שמאפשרת נסיעה ברכב או בג'יפ היא צריכה להיות מתוייגת כ highway=track גם אם הגישה לרכב אסורה או חסומה.

האם דרך העפר
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44181790
הפכה צרה מדי לכלי רכב ששינית אותה ל path?

כרגע, התגית 
motor_vehicle=private
לא רלוונטית ל path
Sanniu (2025-04-27 10:52:23+00:00): Hi, been there long ago. The path clearly built for pedestrians, but wide enough for utility tractor. Not the road. IMO the motor_vehicle=private can be deleted
zstadler (2025-04-27 12:36:53+00:00): Yes, it looks like it is wide enough for a utility tractor or a car.
Therefore, it should be mapped as highway=track
Sanniu (2025-04-28 13:37:05+00:00): fixed
zstadler (2025-04-28 13:49:11+00:00): Thank you!
mikimapbuilder (2024-04-30 06:41:40+00:00): Removed descriptive name and modifed road because of the overlap
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-12 05:29:57+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150691603
Hager_M (2024-05-12 11:33:41+00:00): Hello Aarogya Pandey
Thank you for your comment, appreciate it.
Regards
Hager_M
michel60 (2024-05-03 18:07:00+00:00): Bonjour,
Suite à la modification de la place du trocadéro, la continuité de certaines lignes de bus est incorrecte.
Utiliser GEOFABRIK OSM Inspector pour vérifier la continuité:
- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=2.28823&lat=48.86296&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.94&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid
- Ligne en noir => erreur
- Cliquer sur le ligne pour voir l'erreur
Il y a au moins Ligne de bus 22 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1254457 qui est en erreur
"Way members unordered or missing"
P.S. GEOFABRIK OSM Inpector se met à jour toutes les 13 heures ...
Cordialement Michel
michel60 (2024-05-04 06:13:46+00:00): Bonjour,
- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=2.34052&lat=48.84596&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.94&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways
Cordialement Michel
Ewen Hill (2024-10-25 08:09:25+00:00): Hi Antec1993 - Thanks for doing this detailed mapping. I am trying to get some details on Exploration Reef Trail. I can't see any other mention or any strava action in this area. Do you know anything further please? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1278409656/history
InsertUser (2024-04-30 12:41:49+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You don't cite a source for any of these, where are you getting this information?

The nodes you have added do not identify what type of feature they are so they will not show up to anyone looking for them. See this link for potential types:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features

Finally, please try to keep changesets to a reasonable geographic area, something this size will notify people monitoring their hometowns in half a dozen countries. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-12 05:25:40+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150693321
mona_magdy (2024-05-12 11:06:01+00:00): Hello Aarogya Pandey
Thank you for your comment, appreciate it.
Regards
mona_magdy
ivanbranco (2024-04-30 22:05:11+00:00): Ciao froipe, sei un altro account di cucunto? Perché non utilizzare un unico account?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-30 07:50:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9416493573

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-06 20:13:18+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150981675
这里没有鱼 (2024-05-12 01:38:52+00:00): 不要破坏数据
neuhausr (2024-05-08 15:22:01+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap, thanks for adding to the map! One thing I noticed on this changeset is you tagged the Clear Sky apartment building as landuse=residential instead of as a building. Landuse could be used for the area the building is in (along with parking, etc). I fixed it, but thought I'd let you know since you're relatively new. Happy mapping!
这里没有鱼 (2024-05-12 01:36:24+00:00): 错误数据已回退
GEO ECLA (2024-04-30 08:27:07+00:00): Attention adresse supprimée (par erreur ?).
Corrigé avec https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150695041
Mammi71 (2024-08-17 19:36:29+00:00): Hallo Protoxenus, warum ist Deiner Meinung nach der Deichbegleitweg ein hw=service und kein hw=track?
Mammi71 (2024-08-20 09:48:59+00:00): Ergänzende Info zum Klärwerk Zingst: war vom Vormapper falsch als Deich gemappt, ist aber eine Böschung, das gesamte Gelände zwischen den Klärbecken ist erhöht. Ich habs geändert. Danke für Deine entsprechende note.
gogorm (2024-04-30 17:35:37+00:00): This looks like the wrong location to add this park. Please re-check.
martianfreeloader (2024-11-30 18:14:34+00:00): Hi mate,

Thanks for you joining OSM.

We don't map individual lanes of roads if they are not physically separated. I'll therefore revert your edits.

See https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Highways#Carriageways
JLZIMMERMANN (2025-10-15 19:33:08+00:00): J'ai ajusté l'emprise en tenant compte de la réalité d'usage des habitants : la parcelle d'entrée à gauche était initialement exclue, mais à terme tous les habitants font partie du même quartier.
silversurfer83 (2024-04-30 09:08:53+00:00): Gude Hubert :)

kurze Frage: Heißt dieser eine Baum wirklich so oder ist das jetzt nur die deutsche Bezeichnung der Species, die du ja sowieso eingetragen hast?

Dazu auch der Hinweis auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150695737
HubertB (2024-05-01 07:42:29+00:00): Hi :) Vor dem Baum befindet sich ein Schild, dort steht drauf "Mammutbaum, ca. 1900 gepflanzt". Er ist auch um einiges Größer als die umliegenden Bäume und sticht daher schon von weitem heraus. Ich dachte mir das rechtfertigt vielleicht einen separaten Eintrag auf OSM, damit andere Wanderer ihn auch finden können.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150695737
silversurfer83 (2024-05-01 08:55:53+00:00): Ah. Ok. Könnte passen 

Schönen Feiertag :)
HubertB (2024-05-01 09:26:56+00:00): Danke, dir auch :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150695737
eggie (2024-04-30 10:32:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback   Is het gebouw werkelijk kleiner geworden?
Wanneer iets niet klopt kun je dit doorgeven aan het Kadster via onderstaande site
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=beekstraat+1+hen&objectId=1876010001013506&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=215760.1615&geometry.y=453295.6945&zoomlevel=15
Ik pas het gebouw weer even aan. 


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
unni-geo (2024-05-07 13:45:40+00:00): FYI:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Mappe_keine_vor%C3%BCbergehenden_Ereignisse_und_Objekte_tempor%C3%A4rer_Natur%E2%86%99

Stattdessen, siehe auch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:UMap
unni-geo (2024-05-07 14:00:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150697250

https://handball-wtv.de/index.php/ems-cup
Nordseeküstenradweg (2024-08-11 13:57:17+00:00): Der EMS-Cup ist ja jetzt Geschichte. Sind die Kleinfelder wieder entfernt und die Spielfelder ihrer ursprünglichen Bestimmung (sprich Fußball und Rugby) zugeführt worden?
FStueker (2024-08-11 14:49:59+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, dass der Datensatz noch drin war.
Habe den Änderungssatz bei Revert UI eingegeben, um die alten und passenden Sportanlagen wiederherzustellen (Satz 155106012).