piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
francians (2024-09-21 10:09:13+00:00): Ciao,

bus=yes non si mette sulle fermate, ma solo sulla posizione dove si ferma il bus. Ti chiederei di ripristinare la situazione precedente

Francesco
ivanbranco (2024-09-21 10:41:36+00:00): É un suggerimento di iD editor, se pensi sia incorretto forse sarebbe meglio aprire una issue nel loro GitHub per risolvere il problema alla fonte.
francians (2024-09-21 11:18:02+00:00): Ciao Ivan,

si. Penso che non sia corretto. Inoltre, non è la prima volta che capita..
Chiederei sicuramente a chiunque contribuisce a OSM di non mettersi a usare le funzioni di "correzione" automatica alla leggera, o spostando la colpa sull'editor..se fosse stato utile o migliorativo lo avremmo fatto in maniera massiva, no?
bbgg (2024-09-21 12:39:45+00:00): ciao,
la correzione proposta dall'editor mi sembra corretta

nella documentazione vedo che bus=yes si usa per
1) Legal access permission for public transport buses; 2) the type of public transport vehicle

nella pagina dedicata
Since 2011, some mappers have used bus=yes with highway=bus_stop, public_transport=platform, or both, to specify that a feature is a bus stop. This is the most common use of bus=yes.
francians (2024-09-21 12:51:43+00:00): Ciao,

guarda le linee guida per mappare le fermate dei bus: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway=bus%20stop
bbgg (2024-09-22 15:03:42+00:00): ciao,
non vedo controindicazioni su bus=yes.
Nella pagina in inglese bus=yes non è nemmeno citato.
Ritengo possa restare come è in assenza di chiare indicazioni contrarie.
francians (2024-09-22 15:11:22+00:00): Non è citato perché non necessario. Non so se ti rendi conto che è tautologico dire che una fermata del bus è accessibile dai bus. Prova a usare Josm, e vedrai che queste presunte "correzioni" non ti verranno proposte
nevw (2024-09-21 09:08:35+00:00): Hi, does this company occupy all floors of the building?
HERO SHOT (2024-09-21 09:33:04+00:00): no
nevw (2024-09-21 10:33:06+00:00): You have added the business address to the whole building.
If the business occupies a floor or unit within the building, you should add a node within the building outline and add the business tags to it instead of the building outline. 
Same goes for interstate offices.
nevw (2024-09-21 10:35:40+00:00): The tag addr:floor or addr:unit may be applicable
nevw (2024-09-22 00:47:49+00:00): I am shifting the business tags from the building to a separate node at this site...401 Collins Street, but noticed your web page has the Melbourne Main Office at 220 Collins St.

https://heroshotphotography.com/contact/

Which is correct please?
nevw (2024-09-25 11:53:03+00:00): Because of the discrepancy between the business web site listed addresses and where you have mapped the business, I am inclined to delete this entry.
Can you explain why this mapped address should remain thanks.
Is it because not all of the businesses office locations are listed on their website?
nevw (2024-10-04 10:59:10+00:00): no response, deleted
Nearby0051 (2024-09-26 13:00:17+00:00): Moin
Gibt es das Geschäft Weimeister tatsächlich auf beiden Seiten des Gebäudes oder ist es nun doppelt eingetragen?
Weimeister (2024-09-26 13:47:54+00:00): Moin,
unser Geschäft geht durch das Haus. die Adresse Ditmar-Koel-Straße 27 ist unser Hintereingang und unsere Anliefer Adresse für Paletten und Großgeräte in unsere Petroleumgeräte Reparaturwerkstatt.
Nearby0051 (2024-09-26 15:58:02+00:00): Dann würde ich die Hinterseite eher als loading Dock / Tür eintragen

Dann kann das Hauptgeschäft als einzelner Ort besser gefunden werden, was für Kunden bei der Navigation auch mehr hilft
Und dann kann man den Wareneingang auch noch genauer spezifizieren (zb mit einem extra Namen)
silversurfer83 (2024-09-21 14:45:28+00:00): Hi

warst du hier vor Ort? Hast du dir mal die Luftbilder alle angesehen? Warum löscht du das in Bau befindliche Gebäude?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156901958
Bienson (2024-09-21 21:34:24+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156929404
Niederpruem (2024-09-21 21:53:49+00:00): Schaue Dir mal das Satelliten-Bild bei Google Maps an. Es ist ganz neu und man kann sehr gut den neuen Parkplatz sehen.
Bienson (2024-09-21 23:52:12+00:00): Ja, gerne den Parkplatz einzeichnen, wenn der neben den Neubauten wieder eingerichtet wurde.
Die Gebäude sind ja trotzdem noch da.
silversurfer83 (2024-09-22 05:50:38+00:00): Google ist keine Quelle, die wir für unsere Arbeit nutzen dürfen! Keine Diskussion!

Lass die Finger davon und guck selber vor Ort, wenn du unsicher bist.

Wir sind nicht google und wir wollen nicht wie google sein. Und wenn die ein Objekt anders nennen als wir, dann musst du damit leben.
nevw (2024-09-21 11:04:50+00:00): Would shop=photo be suitable for the business
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dphoto
Although the craft tag is correct, I don’t think the craft tags get rendered on most layers so an additional shop tag may display better.
nevw (2024-09-22 01:41:54+00:00): This business you have tagged as 15 Clarence St but have mapped at 50 Clarence St. The company website lists it at 50 Clarence St.
https://heroshotphotography.com/contact/
Which is correct?
nevw (2024-09-22 01:49:17+00:00): I have changed it to 50 Clarence Street and added shop=photo
aTarom (2024-09-21 10:33:19+00:00): Hola Lloc, gracias por editar, este typo 
"abandoned:higtway" (...higtway -> ...highway)
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317083754/history
y
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317093249/history
no se exactamente si se trata de un simple "abandoned"="yes"?
Ante la duda siempre pregunto
Saludos
Lloc (2024-09-24 14:10:46+00:00): Hola aTarom.
Trato de definir un camino antiguo perdido, que tras un incendio su plataforma ha vuelto a ser visible. Pienso que si aparece en el mapa se usará. 
La etiqueta "abandoned:highway=yes" es valida, ¿no?
Por cierto lo escribí mal en ambos casos.
Saludos.
aTarom (2024-09-24 14:21:36+00:00): Gracias por contestar, ya veo que se adelantó otro usuario en corregir el typo, nada que añadir, perfecto entonces.
Saludos y feliz mapeo!
Zekovski (2024-09-21 12:36:05+00:00): Hello.
Lorsqu'un commerce a fermé, généralement on ne supprime pas le point. (J'ai fait la même erreur auparavant.)
Ça permet de garder l'historique s'il est ensuite repris.

Personnellement je remplace name par old_name, et shop par disused:shop (marche avec amenity et autres).

Merci pour te contributions en tous cas.
Turb (2024-09-21 16:41:07+00:00): En fait ça a été remplacé par Cerballiance, que quelqu'un d'autre à ajouté sans remplacer celui-là.
Zekovski (2024-09-21 18:56:06+00:00): Ah ! Je ne le voyais pas sur le rendu.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-21 16:41:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193904696

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bkil (2024-09-24 22:32:00+00:00): Köszönjük a közreműködést. Felküldtem néhány formai javítást. Az OSM kulcsaira vannak bizonyos konvenciók amit érdemes követni annak érdekében, hogy a különféle eszközök és weblapok is egységesen tudják értelmezni az adatokat. A nyitvatartásban a napok között pontosvesszőt használunk elválasztásra. A terrace kulcs dokumentációja szerint arra használatos, hogy egy panzió biztosít-e saját erkélyt egy szobához. Itt az outdoor_seating=yes kulcsra van szükségünk, amiben igény esetén még pontosítható a kültéri ültetési lehetőség típusa. A brewery=various címke akkor használatos, amennyiben már fel nem sorolható mennyiségű sörfőző terméke érhető el (de legalább 5). A smoking=outside itt azt jelenti, hogy a belső udvarban található dohányzásra kijelölt hely vagy netán azt, hogy a teraszon szabad dohányozni? https://wiki.osm.org/Hungary/Fontos_szempontok#opening_hours https://wiki.osm.org/Key:terrace
bxl-forever (2024-09-21 11:05:41+00:00): Hello,

Is the name of this place really written is lower case?
Ygramul (2024-09-21 15:49:27+00:00): Hey, thanks for your contributions. Note that tags in OSM are typically lowercased, so I've changed your Bridge=Yes to bridge=yes, otherwise it wouldn't mean anything to software processing or rendering the data.
Enock4seth (2024-11-04 10:20:58+00:00): Hi, you seem to have mapped multiple roads with 100 km/h, can you clarify why?
Taksine (2024-09-21 09:50:48+00:00): 另外黄岩岛有个重复的行政边界，我顺带一起删了
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-21 16:41:52+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/932030894

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-21 16:41:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363182002
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1263210123

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-09-21 12:05:10+00:00): Dag Mappebol..
Het beste kun je voortaan de oude adresnode leegmaken en dan op de nieuwe adresnode bijtaggen. Anders krijg je twee identieke adressen en het oude adres is van de kaart verdwenen.
Ik heb je info samengevoegd met de BAG adresnode.
De oude adresnode was geen officilee adres en ook niet compleet.
MVG
eggie
Mappebol (2024-09-21 12:31:52+00:00): Hoi eggie,

Dank voor je review en instructies. Ik zal het de volgende keer zo proberen!

Groet, Mappebol
Nakaner-repair (2025-05-20 13:51:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166526413 where the changeset comment is: Revert addition of communication towers. We do not have a confirmation by LGL that they agree our method of attribution. In addition, the import was not documented.
大山かなめ (2024-09-21 11:01:33+00:00): 行政区境や通路が複雑に接続されているため、東口の一部のみを修正しました。西側の修正にご協力いただける方がいましたら幸いです
Derkades (2024-09-21 11:23:49+00:00): Ik heb per ongeluk de changeset geupload zonder een notitie, dus bij deze:

Zuidtangent getagd als highway=secondary ipv highway=tertiary om te volgende redenen:

- De weg scheidt vaak wijken
- Er zijn geen huizen direct aan de weg
- Het is de hoofdweg om van de ene kant (westtangent) naar de andere kant (oosttangent) van heerhugowaard te komen.

Hiermee is past het naar mijn mening bij highway=secondary: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tagging_van_Nederlandse_wegen
eggie (2024-09-21 12:06:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-09-21 12:08:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Kijk voor dit soort parkeerstroken bij..
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=156907618
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
trigpoint (2024-09-21 11:40:57+00:00): Bore da
You seem to have 2 contradictory name: and name:cy tags here.

Is the name:en verifiable, or just a translation?

Diolch Phil
WillFR130 (2024-09-21 19:48:16+00:00): Good evening

So this area of trees is currently Coed y Warrin.
It is also been known as Coed Penfacha in the past. 
The English translating for the current name is The Warren woods. 
I see you picked up on my change set within minutes of me uploading it. At the time I thought I'd corrected the contradictory issue. 

Thank you for checking with me though. 
Kind regards 

Will
Nathan_A_RF (2024-09-22 22:25:01+00:00): Please see the wiki for correct maxspeed:type tags and correct lit tags
Richard Carden (2024-09-28 12:13:23+00:00): They've been changed as appropriate.
os-emmer (2024-09-21 11:37:40+00:00): Quelle: https://www.thw-hamburg-nord.de/ -> Wir -> Unser Ortsverband
NieWnen (2024-11-04 20:14:55+00:00): Zatoczka autobusowa to nie jest highway=busway. Poprawiłem.
eggie (2024-09-21 12:15:38+00:00): Tip  Je kunt het beste bijtaggen op de bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
android5027 (2024-12-19 18:12:41+00:00): Thank you for converting the artwork node into a ruins node. The feature is inherently a ruined bridge support.

However, I'd like to see the artwork tags preserved, either on this node or another node. 

Maybe the ruins can be converted into an area, and the artwork can be added back as a node on the area? When I surveyed the bridge support, it was rectangular, wider on the north/south sides than the east/west sides. The graffiti was on on the longer, southern face.
dannmer (2024-12-19 18:39:23+00:00): Added artwork_type=graffiti to bridge pier
android5027 (2024-12-19 19:07:42+00:00): Thank you. Great. But according to the wiki, artwork_type=graffiti requires tourism=artwork too, doesn't it?
dannmer (2024-12-19 21:13:44+00:00): You may be correct, feel free to add the tourism=artwork tag if you think it is appropriate.
android5027 (2024-12-20 01:35:43+00:00): I added tourism=artwork to the node. Thanks.
eggie (2024-09-21 12:14:29+00:00): Lijkt me oke....
gr eggie
eggie (2024-09-21 12:12:29+00:00): Dag OSMfan

Je kunt de gebouwen laten importeren door een verzoek te doen op het forum van OSM in het draadje BAG importverzoeken. De drempel is laag... dus gewoon doen.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2024-09-21 18:56:26+00:00): Importverzoek loopt https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/2578
eggie (2024-09-21 12:20:02+00:00): Hoi  Mocht je je willen verdiepen in bankjes zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=bench

Mapse
eggie
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2024-10-08 15:37:42+00:00): Gens de voyage areas are not tourism=caravan_site, but residential=halting_site
NaSH (2024-12-01 12:24:48+00:00): oh..
thank you for correcting it
YomanNH (2024-11-05 11:10:00+00:00): Cześć,

zniknęło połączenie tych dwóch dróg:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227230473
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323360080 ?
Z jakiego źródła informacji korzystałeś usuwając to połączenie?
YomanNH (2024-11-20 06:52:38+00:00): Dziękuję za brak odpowiedzi. Połączyłem ponownie drogi.
Langlaeufer (2024-11-01 23:10:08+00:00): Hi,
Cycleway=opposite ist veraltet und sollte nicht mehr gesetzt werden. Oneway:bicycle=no ist ausreichend.
Grüße Langlaeufer
That_user (2024-09-26 07:42:36+00:00): accurate
Jordi MF (2024-09-22 10:15:32+00:00): "Mercajátiva" es un nombre inventado ya que el nombre registrado es "MercaXàtiva" y, por lo tanto, no tiene traducción. ¿Puedes decirnos qué fuente has usado para añadir dicho nombre?
Tomas Straupis (2024-09-21 14:37:43+00:00): These are bad changes (as explained in other similar changes). And they are not discussed with Lithuanian community, so will probably be reverted.
ftrebien (2024-09-22 18:01:30+00:00): A nova ponte não aparece no Copernicus Browser com a coleção Sentinel-2 selecionada. Aparece no plano pago?
sulriograndense (2024-09-22 18:05:40+00:00): Aparece normalmente pra mim. Fica ali onde o DNIT iria iniciar a ponte de ferro, mas acabou desistindo.

https://imgur.com/PsK1sZw

Imagem de 18/04/2024
nebulousCarina (2026-05-13 14:08:00+00:00): shouldn't this relation be type=multilinestring ?
Jordi MF (2024-09-22 09:59:16+00:00): ¿Por qué has modificado el nombre principal de la "Plaça de l'Espanyoleto" por el de "Plaza" si las placas de todo el municipio están en valenciano?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-21 16:41:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6151853322

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
osmviborg (2024-09-21 14:02:43+00:00): Vær venlig ikke at 'hegne' hele motorvejsstrækninger, eller andre vejtyper ind i græs, eller anden form for landuse. Der gror måske græs på begge sider af vejen; men ikke i selve vejarealet.
osmviborg (2024-09-21 14:07:11+00:00): Hvordan vil du forsvare at mappe dette her som 'natural=grassland'????? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=156912996
osmviborg (2024-09-21 14:08:34+00:00): Eller dette: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=156913073
eggie (2024-11-18 10:41:53+00:00): Dag  OSM Fan..
Beter niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dat geeft vaak schade.
Doe zoiets bv  in twee keer. 
Dus opslaan .. uit de editmodus en dan pas naar het volgende project.
MVG
eggie
skquinn (2024-09-22 03:04:22+00:00): Hi,

For future reference, please note that Pappas is the last name of the founder of the restaurant chain and as such it is not spelled with an apostrophe.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-22 21:04:02+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=motorway
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156911630
VLD062 (2024-10-11 21:16:33+00:00): Hey Sawera21! It looks like you've added features to OSM using data from Google. While we appreciate your enthusiasm for mapping, it's important to note that using Google as a source is not allowed on OSM.

To ensure the accuracy and integrity of OSM map data, we rely on contributors to gather information from their own ground level survey or from publicly available sources that are free from copyright restrictions.

Unfortunately, this means that any features you've added using Google as a source will need to be removed.

For more information on what sources are acceptable for use in OSM, please check out the OSM wiki page on copyright. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright

If you have additional questions, please let me know.Thanks for your understanding!

-Jesspher
ivanbranco (2025-01-04 20:53:10+00:00): Hi SekeRob,

There are 260 denotation=e trees, I suppose it's an error? https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/denotation=e
SekeRob (2025-01-05 12:13:13+00:00): Hi ivanbrance,

Search but got got nothing in my saved datasets and following your TI link also returns zero... maybe someone already deleted the tag, bout which I would not be happy.
Did find though 6 with denotation=aù, so changed those to agricultural
SekeRob (2025-01-05 12:33:24+00:00): Confused.... loaded this 4 month old CS into JOSM, but there's no trees in it. Loaded the large dataset of the wider area, had been working on yesterday and today, refreshed. There's like 25.5K trees in them, 98% agricultural, even 2 monumental, but none with 'e' as tag value. JOSM is great as it summary lists all the tag values used for the natural=tree nodes found.
ivanbranco (2025-01-05 12:47:19+00:00): JOSM is wrong, there are several trees in this CS, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12189885288/history/1

they have been edited 1 hour after my comment: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161002880
SekeRob (2025-01-05 12:59:04+00:00): Well, someone in level0 deleted the tags one hour after your comment, so that's that.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161002880
SekeRob (2025-01-05 13:33:30+00:00): JOSM was not wrong, it was me not seeing the 26 off screen... sorry. I've restored the denotation tag from that level0 edit and chgd e to agricultural.

(the aù comes from the ù being right next to the invio key. Normally a is enough to fill out agricultural but then when hitting the ù instead of invio this happens. After that aù sticks in the past used values table and there it goes repeating. Clean that hist out in the editor. /o\
ciao
Wilcooo (2024-09-21 13:44:17+00:00): Some of these may look like duplicate benches, but these are multiple benches in close proximity to eachother (one of which might have already been mapped)
Yukiro (2024-09-21 13:43:01+00:00): Hi, I have noticed that you made a few mistakes. If something doesn't have a name, there is no need to add it (e.g. path, building etc.). Please delete unnecessary names. If you need help, I can do it for you/show you how to do it :)
4004 (2024-09-21 22:34:36+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
а там действительно снесли здание лицея?
Mogilev-01 (2024-09-26 10:57:26+00:00): Добрый день. Лицея давно нет, только Соседи и Три цены
4004 (2024-09-27 08:02:39+00:00): Понятно, но здание они занимают старое? Просто лицей был обозначен вместе со зданием, вы снесли оба объекта
aceman444 (2025-03-18 10:40:01+00:00): Zdravim, to je podla akej koncepcie, ze "Hypermaket" ide do znacky 'branch' ? To je nazov tejto pobocky?
Skor by tam malo ist "Levice", ako maju na stranke, https://www.tesco.sk/obchody/levice/tureck%C3%BD-rad-7 .
Davileci (2026-05-16 23:17:00+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Objetos_que_generan_dudas_en_España#Hórreo
waldyrious (2026-05-18 08:42:18+00:00): Thanks for the heads-up, @Davileci! So the tagging should then be changed from building=barn + barn=horreo to building=granary + raised=yes?
Davileci (2026-05-18 10:56:07+00:00): Yes, I think so.
waldyrious (2026-05-18 18:00:50+00:00): Alright, done in changeset 182846198 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182846198)
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-02 23:53:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159862440, 159862427, 159862512, 159862481, 159862457, 159862433 where the changeset comment is: revert roblox_gmx edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16954
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-23 21:06:44+00:00): Reverted
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156913773
rempshaener (2024-10-20 09:28:02+00:00): Hallo,
könntest du dir die TR https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18073879 einmal anschauen?
Unter anderem diese Relation wird als Fehler im Brouter ausgewiesen (https://brouter.de/brouter/suspects/Germany/NorthRhineWestphalia/OberbergischerKreis/all/804493133263571670). Ich vermute das Problem ist, dass "via" kein Node ist.
Ich möchte da aber nicht dran rumpfuschen, da ich mich nicht vor Ort auskenne.
Viele Grüße
RubenKelevra (2024-10-20 10:27:28+00:00): Klar, gesagt getan. Die Relation ist korrekt, offensichtlich ist der Test kaputt, genau wie der Test in JOSM.

Dokumentation im Wiki erlaubt immer schon Wege als "via", aber die Tests beschweren sich üblicherweise drüber. 🤷‍♂️

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction#Members
rempshaener (2024-10-20 11:03:33+00:00): Ich finde bei den BRouter Suspects leider keinen direkten Kontakt, sonst würde ich es melden.
Danke!
RubenKelevra (2024-10-20 12:26:42+00:00): Vielleicht Arndt direkt drauf ansprechen?

abrench im Forum:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/brouter-brouter-web-brouter-suspects-auf-neuer-hardware/101158
rempshaener (2024-10-20 13:13:38+00:00): Danke für den Tipp
rempshaener (2024-11-03 09:45:16+00:00): Da ist immer noch ein Suspect übrig, aber sei es drum...
Ich habe von abrensch auch einige zusätzliche Infos erhalten.
Demnach beziehen sich die Suspects immer nur auf einzelne Nodes, die vias über ways können keinen Hinweis triggern. Er wies nur noch einmal darauf hin, dass via-ways von so gut wie keinem Router umgesetzt werden.
Bad-TR sind i.d.R. solche, wo einer der ways den via-node nicht als Endpunkt hat, es weniger als zwei ways gibt oder wo der Name nicht zur Geometrie passt.
Viele Grüße