piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Patrick78 (2026-03-24 12:02:29+00:00): Bonjour,
Il doit y a voir une erreur dans votre mise à jour des horaires d'ouverture. En effet, par principe Sherpa est ouvert l'hiver et  donc Apr-Sep: 08:30-22:30 n'a pas de sens. On aurait du avoir quelque chose du type Dec-Apr,Jul,Aug 08:30-22:30 avec en plus une pause méridienne l'été car la station est plutôt calme. Merci d'y jeter un oeil. Cdlt Patrick
lubulu111 (2026-03-25 11:52:56+00:00): Merci beaucoup d'avoir repéré l'erreur !J'avais inversé la période. C'est bien ouvert l'hiver, fermé l'été. Et ouvert en continu l'hiver.
Patrick78 (2026-03-25 21:21:59+00:00): Super, je suppose idem pour le restaurant: Bois de l'Ours?

Merci de regarder aussi celui là.
eggie (2026-03-22 21:32:41+00:00): Hoi,

In zo'n geval selecteer ik alle gebouwen en zet ze op building:part=proposed
proposed=house
Met de nodes kun je ook zoiets doen.
Voorbeeld https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.781886/4.653668&layers=N
Dan hoeft er in ieder geval niet opnieuw geïmporteerd te worden. 
Groet,
eggie
keesm (2026-03-23 09:35:49+00:00): Bedankt voor je bericht, weer wat geleerd.
Vooralsnog laat ik het even zo, want ik verwacht dat ze binnenkort wel gaan starten. Zag al bouwaansluiting daar en wat piketten in de grond. 
Gr.
Kees
Strubbl (2026-03-22 20:08:52+00:00): Das ging schnell. Danke fürs Eintragen!
JakovRajić (2026-03-24 11:10:54+00:00): Wrong tags fixed in changeset/180348090
silversurfer83 (2026-03-22 20:22:22+00:00): hi

sollte es dann nicht "razed" sein? Wie viel ist denn noch zu erkennen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180255724
JakobD029 (2026-03-22 20:28:37+00:00): Guten Abend,
Die Trasse ist neben der noch bestanden Trasse an den Meisten Punkten noch vorhanden und gut zu erkennen. Dort wurde zwar Teilweise der Schotter entfernt, jedoch wächst dort auch nichts grünes mehr.
Am besten erkennt man dir Trasse an den Brücken die ursprünglich ja für 2 Gleise gebaut wurden.
In einigen Teilen würde razed vielleicht auch passen, aber größtenteils erkennt man die Trasse noch.
silversurfer83 (2026-03-22 20:30:18+00:00): Alles klar. Danke für die Rückmeldung :)
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
literan (2026-03-23 19:29:29+00:00): не надо баловаться
NeisBot (2026-03-22 15:12:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12566708429 v13

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Piscine"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-30 16:33:13+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180638442
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
JakovRajić (2026-03-24 11:14:11+00:00): Wrong tags fixed in changeset/180348290
grzegorzmilosz (2026-03-22 15:31:15+00:00): Uwaga !!!
na mapie zaznaczyłem przebieg projektowanej północnej obwodnicy Oławy zwanej trasą mostową. Jej przebieg wytyczyłem na postawie granicy działek przeznaczonych pod budowę tej drogi z geoportalu. Jeśli korzystasz z edytora wbudowanego w przeglądarkę w opcjach Warstwy tła włącz: Geoportal 2: Granice działek jeśli korzystasz z zewnętrznego edytora to zajrzyj na geoportal: https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp_2.html z włączoną warstwą Państwowy rejestr granic. przebieg trasy jest ostateczny i w takowym będzie on zbudowany w przeciągu 5 lat. Jeśli macie jakieś zastrzeżenia dotyczące naniesionej projektowanej drogi proszę do mnie napisać tu czy w wiadomości.
silversurfer83 (2026-03-22 20:20:59+00:00): Moinsen :)

da es a) auf dem Luftbild noch klar ein Golfplatz ist und b) für viele in der Gegend der "Golfplatz Waldeck" bleiben wird, wäre es vorteilhaft hier auch passende Lebenszykluspräfixe zu nutzen um die alten Eigenschaften teilweise zu erhalten.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Unabhängig davon: Danke für's aufpassen

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180256804
Alexey_ND (2026-03-23 06:50:13+00:00): Дружище, мультиполигоны так не рисуют. В итоге много ошибок. Вот статья описывающая как надо...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Relation:multipolygon
ipbatman (2026-03-24 09:27:04+00:00): Ничего не понятно. Поле с участниками не появляется.
osmviborg (2026-03-22 15:54:45+00:00): Jeg synes at 'tunnel=flooded' & 'waterway=ditch' er uheldig, 'tunnel' og 'ditch' passer ikke sammen. Der er tale om et rørlagt vandløb. Hvad synes du om 'man_made=pipeline' 'location=underground' 'substance=water' i stedet for?
cyclist789 (2026-03-23 07:49:28+00:00): Ja, jeg kan godt se problemet. Den første antyder cement, metal, keramik eller plastik, og den anden antyder jord.
(I virkeligheden passer selve Key:tunnel ikke sammen med waterway=ditch.)

På tunnel=flooded (engelsk udgave) står der, at man_made=pipeline kun er for "tubes assemblies", hvilket jeg ikke ved, hvad er.
Jeg tænker, at jeg fortsætter som jeg gør, men du er velkommen til algoritmisk at erstatte dem alle på én gang, hvis du er sikker på din fortolkning.

Har du eventuelt et eksempel fra udlandet, der viser den rigtige tagging?

PS: Pas på med de apostroffer ('). De har ødelagt dine links, så OSM tror, at apostroffen er del af Key'en. (Tryk på et af dine links, så kan du se, hvad jeg mener.)
osmviborg (2026-03-23 08:02:29+00:00): En tube er et rør, så det passer jo godt nok. Hvis du vil bruge min fortolkning (tagging), så ændrer jeg dem du har lavet indtil nu, OK?
cyclist789 (2026-03-23 08:07:50+00:00): Ja, ret dem gerne.

Men vil du gøre det samme ved én-meter-korte stykker tunnel=culvert?
Jeg er ikke sikker på, at det er besværet værd, at lave den slags ændringer...
osmviborg (2026-03-23 08:13:32+00:00): Nej, selvfølgelig ikke. Culvert er mest til vejunderføring (road, railway, or embankmen).
cyclist789 (2026-03-23 08:19:11+00:00): Hvis du har algoritmerne til det, kan du eventuelt lave en søgning efter stykker tunnel=culvert på over 100m længde. Jeg tror, jeg satte nogle stykker på Sjælland og dets øer, før jeg opdagede tunnel=flooded.
osmviborg (2026-03-23 08:21:53+00:00): Der er mange. Jeg ændrer kun dem som ikke er deciderede vejunderføringer.
cyclist789 (2026-03-23 08:53:04+00:00): Tak skal du have.

(En vejunderføring kan vel næppe være over 100m lang.)
cyclist789 (2026-03-26 12:00:55+00:00): Jeg ser at du har sat substance=water på visse vandløb, (f.eks. på "Madevandløbet" vest for Mern). Dette betegner dog *drikkevand*. Der er nok nærmere tale om substance=rainwater.
Det er desuden ud som om, du har fjernet layer=-1.

Noget af Madevandløbet er del af en type=waterway Relation, og disse kræver at medlemmerne selv er waterway=*. Jeg ved ikke hvad løsningen er på dette, men lad dem helst forblive del af Relationerne. Beklager, at jeg ikke opdagede denne problemstilling før. 🙇

Hvis noget af det skal rettes, kan du forhåbenligt lave noget kode, der retter objekter, der blev berørt i et bestemt changeset.
cyclist789 (2026-04-17 09:56:48+00:00): Måske er den rette kombination:
waterway=drain tunnel=flooded layer=-1
osmviborg (2026-04-17 10:48:48+00:00): Typisk vil disse rørlagte vandløb være et betonrør på op til en meter i diameter. Jeg synes ikke tunnel passer ind i denne sammenhæng. Gør som du finder bedst.
World_Winner (2026-03-24 03:43:39+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180332970
5mister7 (2026-06-17 11:34:34+00:00): Hi, i noticed that M12 was not deleted and is still here, I appreciate you for removing M6 because that expressway was acutally deleted, See this map and zoom in where M12 was, The map says it is still there, I might revert the M12 change manually soon but i won't revert the whole changeset because M6 is acutally deleted. Info that M12 is still  here is on this map: https://www.putevi-srbije.rs/index.php/стање-на-државним-путевима
konradlee (2026-06-17 16:53:12+00:00): Huh, you're completely right. I don't know where I got the idea from that M12 has been removed too.
Dodko (2026-03-25 14:07:14+00:00): Prečo ste odstránili adresu?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52133271/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169551750/
Rick Richards (2026-03-25 15:52:56+00:00): Zrejme omylom, ospravedlňujem sa. Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180413882 a https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180414052

Budem si dávať väčší pozor, vďaka za upozornenie.
yelisey90 (2026-03-22 21:17:50+00:00): reverted with respect to the Embassy of Hungary: it's two houses to the west, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4910507221 , don't believe google
JakovRajić (2026-03-24 11:15:19+00:00): Wrong tags fixed in changeset/180348329
vectorial8192 (2026-07-11 15:13:38+00:00): Hi there, I noticed this changeset added details to the rural village, but e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1491526318 does not have a house number. Perhaps the changeset is incomplete?
mapa65 (2026-03-26 09:43:18+00:00): I added this POI. Please publish.
NeisBot (2026-03-22 16:03:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 47 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1491527927 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1491527932 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1491527930 v1 | 4 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180258773
NeisReview (2026-03-30 16:33:15+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180265263
amosharper (2026-03-23 08:23:45+00:00): Hello - for Queensway Gateway and Whitworth Road, I've not spotted any signage indicating the change from 40mph to 30mph when entering from either the Queensway or Sedlescombe Rd N side. Is this new or very recently signed?
Nathan_A_RF (2026-03-23 19:49:29+00:00): I drove past Whitworth Road on the A21 Saturday evening and definitley saw a 30mph sign.
amosharper (2026-03-23 19:54:38+00:00): Thanks - my impression was that it was just the side road to Emmaus, but I'll check again in a few days.
Nathan_A_RF (2026-03-23 20:01:20+00:00): Do please check the road numbering around that area too. I'm not sure if the A2100 has been rerouted as a result of the gateway opening, but the signs at the A21 junction did say A2690 which I have corrected.
amosharper (2026-03-27 08:33:56+00:00): I didn't get a chance to check the road numbering yesterday, but your speed limit changes are exactly correct - it goes down into a 30mph east of the roundabout and when joining from the A21, I guess because of the garage and businesses. I'll try to check the road numbering next time I'm there.
iandees (2026-03-22 17:00:41+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2822985814 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180262139, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
stasiu512 (2026-03-22 18:42:09+00:00): Co ma na celu duplikacja tych znaków? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2441907471
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13669443685
PouLS_PL (2026-03-23 15:03:08+00:00): Niechcący zduplikowałem. Dzięki że mi dałeś znać, już usunąłem duplikat
stasiu512 (2026-03-23 18:01:51+00:00): Dziękuję za poprawkę:)
rajdhani (2026-03-23 11:53:05+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180301272
Andrea Del Sarto (2026-03-28 21:23:25+00:00): Ciao,

questo percorso non rispetta le direttive CAI/SOSEC per i percorsi escursionistici:
- è per la maggior parte sovrapposto ad un altro percorso, e questo crea confusione
- è un anello, anzi due, e le indicazioni prevedono di spezzare in più percorsi separati

forse è opportuno rivedere la progettazione

cordiali saluti
Andrea Del Sarto (2026-03-28 21:26:47+00:00): aggiungo che essendo il percorso su strade o forestali il cai_scale è T
NxPFoto (2026-03-22 16:34:51+00:00): * Bushaltestelle verschoben, nicht "Baustelle" :D
AdamVista (2026-03-22 17:13:48+00:00): Je n'ai pas ajouté le prolongement au-delà de Mont-Laurier, car je ne sais pas si cela va y arriver ou pas. Bien qu'on s’entend que le doublement de la réserve faunique La Vérendrye, entre les Laurentides et l’Abitibi, est impensable, à tout le moins pour l’instant.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-07-31 13:51:56+00:00): Ces ajouts sont totalement fantaisistes et ne font partie d'aucun projet officiel du MTMD. SVP ne pas ajouter d'information non vérifiable sur OSM.
iandees (2026-03-22 17:00:50+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13668910017 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180262143, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Hans Thompson (2026-03-23 05:27:23+00:00): has this been validated in person? It doesn't match the state GIS at https://www.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/8afe8ee541394a7da408fdd7e946b4ab
Tomas09 (2026-03-23 19:17:20+00:00): hmmm odd. I was following what the note said. I'll message the original note's creator and revert these changes
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
rarad74 (2026-03-22 18:18:16+00:00): MAi baiatule ti-am zis sa nu mai desenezi aberatii pe harta ca o sa ti le stearga cineva. Si in niciun caz nu dupa BING.
rarad74 (2026-03-22 18:18:34+00:00): Si pune comenturi inteliginle. Nu esti doar tu pe aici.
fghj753 (2026-03-22 18:34:56+00:00): For linking: note/5209910
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
World_Winner (2026-03-24 04:22:01+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 180333715
Tomas Straupis (2026-03-22 19:10:26+00:00): Can you share some official source that CURRENT OFFICIAL name of Klaipėda in Germany is Memel? As per my knowledge regardless of historical context official name is Klaipeda.
OlasMapy (2026-03-23 10:44:25+00:00): Me­mel
Substantiv, Neutrum (Eigenname) – Stadt → alle Informationen
Me­mel
Substantiv, feminin – Fluss → alle Informationen
from duden.de
OlasMapy (2026-03-23 10:45:51+00:00): https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klaipėda also wikipedia article clarifies klaipeda as a lithuanian name and memel as german
OlasMapy (2026-03-23 10:47:04+00:00): możemy też rozmawiać po polsku jak chcesz
Tomas Straupis (2026-03-23 12:12:51+00:00): (I'm from Lithuania, I do not speak polish) You've shown some information about Klaipėda, but that is not official sources, official name is Klaipėda, it is what you will find in any official German documents referring this city. That is if you take any contemporary German document, Klaipėda would be refered as Klaipėda, not as old name "Memel". We call Kaliningrad as Karaliaučius, even in road signs it is named as "Karaliaučius", but that does not mean that we change name:lt to Karaliaučius, as official name is "Kaliningrad". Same with Klaipėda.
OlasMapy (2026-03-23 13:10:09+00:00): klaipeda is the Lithuanian name, german is Memel. Would you say "ich fahre nach Klaipeda" or "ich fahre nach Memel"? Most Germans would choose the latter.
OlasMapy (2026-03-23 13:14:20+00:00): The German national anthem (Deutschlandlied) refers to the city as Memel by the way
Tomas Straupis (2026-03-23 13:22:02+00:00): If German official would write the name, they would write Klaipeda. As a local I've heard Germans referring to this places as both Klaipėda and Memel. There is no other way than official papers, you will never find one variant of "what random people would say". Only official names work. And I think Germans should be changing this name :-) not people from non-related places. Plus you're changing administrative entities which have nothing in common with historical objects, borders, events etc.
OlasMapy (2026-03-23 13:47:40+00:00): "And I think Germans should be changing this name :-)" Just like Królewiec which was stolen and named after a war criminal? Hell no. Also, do you have any sources? Regarding administrative boundaries, I have only changed name:de, nothing more.
Taya_S (2026-03-23 13:51:41+00:00): Please note that whether someone is a war criminal or not has no bearing on how something is named. We record the wordl as it is, not how we wish it should be. 

I've asked about this specific name in a somewhat related ongoing thread: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/whats-everyones-problem-with-name-de/142456/55
OlasMapy (2026-03-23 13:55:10+00:00): https://volgagermaninstitute.org https://ib.frath.net and https://en-academic.com report "Memel" while articles written by Lithuanians including the official tourism site of the city report "Klaipeda". I don't know what's your point here with "official sources".
Tomas Straupis (2026-03-23 13:57:37+00:00): I totally agree with war criminal and Krolewiec, I ment name in OSM should be changed by Germans. Btw, Klaipėda is historical Lithuanian name (with lithuanian taxonomy of the name) for this place which has source predating Germans, so nothing about "war criminals". We need to check any official contemporary German document to verify what is the official name. But look, I'm not going to scream out loud for this :-D I just think we should leave changing this name to language speakers. I'm not going to change this name back to Klaipėda.
OlasMapy (2026-03-23 14:00:10+00:00): "We record the wordl as it is, not how we wish it should be." how about I change old name pl to alt name pl for cities in East Prussia because 1. they're in use and 2. are documented legally? Why did DWG revert this change?
Taya_S (2026-03-23 14:05:58+00:00): If you were to do that you would likely end up receiving another block and you would be told to not mess around with (alt_)name:de or (alt_)name:pl tags anymore unless you can get the local communities to agree.

This is also entirely unrelated to this specific name in question.
OlasMapy (2026-03-23 14:13:04+00:00): Check KSNG list https://www.gov.pl/attachment/19fa85f9-65de-4bb0-8cc4-7dc552229b7d Both names are listed
Tomas Straupis (2026-03-23 15:11:19+00:00): I really do not understand why are you changing names of not your language in not your countries... Let Germans change the names of THEIR language as THEY want. And Polish document is totally irrelevant to German/Lithuanian stuff :-)
OlasMapy (2026-03-23 17:02:03+00:00): this was a response to taya threatening me with another ban due to me fixing alt_name:pl tags in accordance with the list
daganzdaanda (2026-03-23 17:36:39+00:00): > xdddddddxdxdxd vor etwa 4 Stunden 
> The German national anthem (Deutschlandlied) 
> refers to the city as Memel by the way

Well, the 1st stanza which has not been officially sung since 1945 contains "Memel" but referring to the river. The lyrics were written in 1841, so you should not look to them for current usage of anything.
Taya_S (2026-03-24 08:02:16+00:00): In accordance with the general concensus in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/whats-everyones-problem-with-name-de/142456/55, I have restored Klaipeda as name:de, and moved Memel to alt_name:de. I have removed Memel entirely from the administrative boundary. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180339545

In the future, @xdddddddxdxdxd please stop trying to push historical names so hard. If you do not understand how OSM names things, you should refrain from attempting to change names. The fact that you removed the name `Klaipeda` here without so much as moving it to old_name:de or alt_name:de shows this.

You've already received a lot of comments about this from others and even received a short block for interfering with a DWG revert. In the meantime, I suggest reading the linked thread. It goes into a lot of detail with regards to how things are named, when to use name:*, when to use old_name:* and when to use alt_name:*
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
IreuN (2026-04-28 17:49:59+00:00): Co to jest? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1491573098
IreuN (2026-04-28 18:04:59+00:00): Usunąłem..
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports