piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Qwajo OSM (2024-01-10 21:32:25+00:00): Kindly note that buildings are not supposed to be sharing nodes like it was done here, i have seen that most of your buildings share nodes, such are most likely not a clear representation of features on the ground. Thank you
matt_ellery (2024-01-07 19:37:49+00:00): True, but just to check: the name for 387215767 has been tagged "Welcross" but the Grange is definitely "Wellcross". Is there a reason for the different name, or is the airstrip a typo?
Jan Olieslagers (2024-01-08 08:36:25+00:00): Welcross was an obvious typo by myself, I checked sources and they all have Wellcross. Corrected now. Thanks for keeping an eye!
wizerbar (2024-01-14 06:35:08+00:00): не патрэбна пісаць у addr:place назву вёскі калі ў гэтай вёсцы няма назвы вуліцы. дастаткова толькі нумар дома.
eggie (2024-01-07 12:28:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
divaddivag (2024-09-04 12:15:07+00:00): Je ne connaissais pas le 'grass_paver trick' ,  cela rend vraiment bien 👍
mueschel (2024-01-14 12:07:08+00:00): hi,
I found the tag "NEPN" on several ways. This is not used in other places - what does it mean?
chdot (2024-01-14 12:19:47+00:00): It’s the North Edinburgh Path Network

To many people this is the ‘network’ of paths on former railway lines but new links to other paths are expanded this. 

There are several places where existing desire line paths need upgrades - has been ‘promised’ several times
mueschel (2024-01-14 12:29:01+00:00): Thanks for the explanation.
Shouldn't it be 
network=NEPN then?

And I'd suggest to change the not really correct name=(desire line) to informal=yes
KingKratos (2024-07-22 21:46:18+00:00): Please square buildings by pressing Q on your keyboard. I know sometimes it breaks it, but you can reajust it to make it work. 

Por favor, cuadre los edificios presionando Q en su teclado; sé que a veces se rompe, pero puede hacer que funcione.
tastrax (2024-01-08 04:39:08+00:00): Dont forget the +61 etc on phone numbers....country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number
CHMOD700 (2024-01-15 21:08:38+00:00): Thanks.
hsc666 (2024-01-10 07:48:41+00:00): Hallo AlDento und willkommen bei OSM!

Du hast hier die Hausnummer von 26 auf 26b geändert, obwohl zwei Häuser daneben bereits eine 26b existiert. Die jetzige Nummerierung sieht unplausibel aus. Hast Du vielleicht ein Bild der Situation vor Ort?

VG
hsc666
hsc666 (2024-01-20 14:59:38+00:00): Revert mangels Rückmeldung
SpinOff (2024-01-07 21:54:35+00:00): Hej. Ścieżki pieszo-rowerowe oznacza się trochę inaczej. Tutaj jest niezły artykuł: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w
rskedgell (2024-01-07 12:33:13+00:00): Reverted.
rskedgell (2024-01-07 12:38:49+00:00): Reverted.
mcliquid (2024-01-07 17:02:40+00:00): Hallo und vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag.

Ich wäre dir nur sehr verbunden, wenn du deine Änderungen regelmäßiger hochladen könntest, damit der räumliche Umfang nicht über halb Europa reicht.

Danke dir!
fratzzz (2024-01-07 19:55:42+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, nehme
ich mit zu Herzen.
rskedgell (2024-01-07 12:28:26+00:00): Grow up.

Reverted #dwg
dpolovinkin (2024-03-15 18:32:15+00:00): hi! please, don't add buildings when they are giving you alerts when you try to do so - you can't add building a top of other buildings. Also no need to put "doha" in name as it's pretty clear this place is in Doha :) will remove this addition, sorry
4004 (2024-01-15 19:37:28+00:00): Здравствуйте. Перед правками стоит пройти обучение в редакторе. Вы уверены, что ваши данные верны?
rskedgell (2024-01-07 12:43:54+00:00): It wasn't, now it's gone. Find a lavatory wall and some crayons instead.
richlv (2024-01-07 15:41:05+00:00): Sveiki, liels paldies par interesi OpenStreetMap projektā.
Šādas izmaiņas gan īsti neiederas OSM - te tiek ievietotas reālas lietas, kuras ir dzīvē pārbaudāmas, eksistējošas.
Šādiem projektiem, iespējams, piemērotāk būtu atrasties https://opengeofiction.net .
Šo izmaiņu kopu atcēlu.
user_20834120 (2024-01-07 15:43:15+00:00): Nē, kļūdaties jūs, reālā pasaulē arí pastāv šis, varat aiziet un pats parbaudit
gscholz (2024-01-08 07:58:48+00:00): Hi thpr,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "arrondissement d'Annakhil النخيل" and "arrondissement de Guéliz كليز":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-7.95666&lat=31.62944&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145989864

I have just fixed this. Please watch out what you are doing.
Kind regards
Guido
Totor (2024-01-08 04:08:01+00:00): Hi,
I believe optician or fashion_accessories would be better than "model".
model seems to be for scale models:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=model?uselang=en
DaftPunk (2024-01-08 10:08:30+00:00): Exactly. That is a more suitable tag for a sunglasses store. Thank you for the suggestion!
Marek-M (2024-01-15 11:03:44+00:00): Połączyłeś tutaj pola i łąki do linii granicy administracyjnej https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1226710023 (np. w pobliżu tego węzła https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11497105864). To też jest błąd. Poprawka tego to sporo pracy i rozważam wycofanie tej edycji.
StefanHRT (2024-01-07 13:22:21+00:00): Hi, Hier die Grundlage für das extra surface ;)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2196261. ggf. einmal mit supaplex030 von der Verkehrswendegruppe Rücksprache halten VG
ivanbranco (2026-06-23 09:32:16+00:00): Ciao fs25,

è stata aperta una nota riguardo a un toponimo che hai aggiunto, riesci a rispondergli? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5357650

(un altro dei toponimi aggiunti in questo changeset è stato già cancellato invece: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11497116715)
canihavesomecoffee (2024-01-07 15:45:05+00:00): Based the changes on:
a) Geopount info
b) A message posted on one of the doors in the street (https://imgur.com/a/MEndJ3k)
c) The fact that HVW is based on nr. 41
multimob (2024-01-10 11:42:04+00:00): Les arrêts "Komen Fleur de Lin" et "Komen Molen" n’existent plus.  Et operator=DLVB est le code pour Vlaams-Brabant, qui n'est pas l'entité qui exploite les lignes de De Lijn dans cette partie du pays.

Attention, ne pas importer des données depuis les GTFS de TEC ou De Lijn car ils contiennent tous les arrêts y compris ceux qui ont été supprimés récemment. Nous sommes occupés à nettoyer la carte de ce côté-ci, et c'est étonnant de voir ces arrêts revenir alors qu'ils ne sont plus desservis.

Attention à ne pas trafiquer le nom de certains arrêts aussi.

Merci.
amadvance (2024-01-07 14:47:42+00:00): Ciao Luca,

Ho visto che hai messo il nome "Cuden" a una relazione che rappresenta un'area boschiva molto estesa. Presumo che non fosse questa la tua intenzione, in quanto l'area è veramente grande, da Sedrina a Nembro.

Il metodo più corretto è creare un punto con "place=locality" e mettere lì il nome.

Ciao,
Andrea
Luchino_BG (2024-01-07 15:06:53+00:00): Ciao, si ho sbagliato infatti l'intento non era quello. Grazie del tuo consiglio
gscholz (2024-01-09 08:46:33+00:00): Hi ErnestoLaPomme,
this changeset has created several overlapping ways and destroyed two roundabouts:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-0.38748&lat=43.23225&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145991497

I have just fixed this. If you edit routes with "osm-relatify " please do not destroy roundabouts, keep them intact to avoid this error. "osm-relatify"  is buggy.

Kind regards
Guido
ErnestoLaPomme (2024-01-09 09:03:17+00:00): Thanks for your feedback, I'll try to take it into account when I make my next changes!

Ernesto
julcnx (2024-01-09 08:49:23+00:00): Hi Russ, were you aware that according to the latest wiki upgrade, all officially recognized villages should be tagged as place=village, irrespective of their size? This information was documented last year under WikiProject Thailand's administrative levels section: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Administrative_levels. If you're uncertain about the official status, it's recommended to use place=village.
Russ McD (2024-01-10 01:03:50+00:00): Julian ... I wish you would do something more useful than checking the edits of a mapper thats been around a lot longer than you.
In the course of this changeset, I stumbled across this "hamlet" which had been mapped as landuse=residential, place=hamlet ...by Alaska Dave.  
This NODE had been changed by a mapper to a Village, (for better visibility !) which made no logical sense as it sat in a relation tagged as a hamlet, and we don't "tag for the renderer"
I simply applied the correction.
Have you contacted Dave as the original mapper of the hamlet? 
I don't read the forum much any more as your attempts to change things for the future do little to address the problem of existing tags.
It's simply not easy to check the official status of a village/hamlet as I pass by, but after recording the name on my GPS, when I put it on the map, I take a look at the size of the settlement.  If its just a few houses, it goes in as a hamlet.... or Non-administrative settlement, as you might refer to it.  
I map what I see on the ground, (some call it Duck tagging https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Duck_tagging ), and will continue to do so.
Russ.
julcnx (2024-01-10 04:41:39+00:00): Hi Russ, keeping it brief: I've initiated a forum discussion for additional input on this matter. While your extensive OSM experience is highly regarded, it's essential to consider community reviews and decisions. Appreciate your understanding. Julien
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposal-for-wiki-amendment-village-vs-hamlet-classification-and-thailand-specific-rule-for-place-hamlet/107903
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145991669
maraf24 (2024-01-19 21:42:03+00:00): Tam jest jakiś znak "tylko dla klientów" czy taki zapis w regulaminie?
Bo jak nic nie ma, to parking powinien być jako ogólnodostępny.
Luca Moiana (2024-01-08 07:31:25+00:00): Ciao, non capisco questa modifica, hai spostato un nodo riferito a cosa?
fs25 (2024-01-08 15:02:37+00:00): Ciao, ho solo inserito i nominativi toponomastici in uso sul territorio comunale, tra l'altro "Novella" dovrà essere riposizionato.
rhtb0 (2024-01-08 10:38:14+00:00): 농지 태그는
crop=rice
landuse=paddy로 태그해주세요.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-07 14:10:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2946693770

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
FraukeLeo (2024-09-21 06:50:48+00:00): Hallo NRWPeter, die von dir angelegten place=quarter (zB https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11497235580) sind mit Sicherheit keine Stadtviertel, sondern höchstens place=locality. Könntest du das hier (und wo du so was sonst noch gemappt hast) korrigieren? Danke!
Grass-snake (2024-07-14 14:38:31+00:00): Reverted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153933500
sergeybe (2024-05-16 06:16:56+00:00): Сделан откат пакета правок. Не занимайтесь вандализмом и не позорте свою страну.
NeisBot (2024-01-08 00:18:09+00:00): Hi ebasjb 👋

your recent changeset has been marked due to a temporary or permanent block from further map edits. 

If you have any questions or if there's anything you'd like to discuss regarding the mapping, feel free to reach out! We're here to help. 

Best regards, 🤖

Details https://osm.org/user_blocks/15555
#ContributorHasBeenBlocked
arjunaraoc (2024-01-23 01:16:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

It is better to focus on small number of map edits in a changeset till you reach 100 changesets. As your account is currently blocked, you may request OSM DWG for  reverting your changeset so that you can start again.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145993471
arjunaraoc (2024-01-23 01:23:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). It is good to start with your changeset containing few changes. If you would like to continue to us this account, you may request  DWG to revert your edit. Hope that helps.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145993471
BCNorwich (2024-01-08 08:31:12+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

These many tracks you've added are actually mostly field boundaries. You can see the lines of agricultural vehicle tracks on some imagery which go across these fields, no along the tracks you've drawn. The best imagery for clarity is Esri World Imagery which you can open in the iD editor. What drew me to look at these tracks is the fact that a lot of sections are duplicated.

Could you map these features as landuse=farmland and survey to determine which lines are truly highways?

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2024-01-12 08:02:25+00:00): No response so I've removed all the duplicate tracks.
BCNorwich (2024-01-11 09:03:07+00:00): Hi, Most of these ways look like field boundary lines rather than tracks. If they are tracks then you have duplicated some sections of them.

So are they really highways or are they field edges?

Regards Bernard.
canfe (2024-01-07 14:55:08+00:00): In che senso "fuoristrada"? La strada c'è o no c'è??
A me sembra esserci, poco marcata, ma c'è.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145993807
GPX Speedtag (2024-01-08 18:20:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/GPX%20Speedtag/traces/11264819
aixbrick (2024-01-08 09:59:15+00:00): Hallo,
für Parkplätze mit Anwohnerparken und Parkticket gibt es ein bestimmtes Taggingschema, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Street_parking. Die Zone wird dabei im Tag "zone" erfasst. access=private würde nur stimmen, wenn die Parkplätze ausschließlich durch Berechtigte genutzt werden dürfen. Hier darf aber jeder gegen Gebühr parken (fee=yes). Ich habe das korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146021801.
Gruß
bxl-forever (2024-01-07 22:48:48+00:00): Hello,

It would be more beneficial to map users if you could please write bus stop names with the proper case.

I am aware that TEC does a very strange thing on their website/app/GTFS data, i.e. they write towns names in all-caps and without accented characters.

But this is not how we map in OSM: our responsability as mappers is to clean up those names and write them properly, i.e. not a screaming "VILLERS-SAINT-AMAND Église" but "Villers-Saint-Amand Église".

Thanks in advance.
andershl (2024-01-07 21:09:49+00:00): Tak, jeg supplerer, når jeg har brugt mit Spotdeal der...
osmviborg (2024-01-07 21:19:34+00:00): 👍
topolusitania (2024-01-07 20:19:53+00:00): Com que base e dados foi apagada a Central Solar ?
DiogoBaptista98 (2024-01-07 20:35:21+00:00): Com recurso a survey e a imagens sentinel, e pergunto de volta, com que base e dados foram criadas tais centrais solares (algumas já com 5 anos mapeadas e sem qualquer correspondência com a realidade )?
topolusitania (2024-01-08 00:04:25+00:00): faz busca no Google e terás a resposta-
Noticia do Expresso na data em que  a central foi mapeada por exemplo. E tinha lá um FIXME e NÂO um erase me ,,,
topolusitania (2024-01-08 00:20:15+00:00): Importas te de ser mais especifico quanto a outras hipotéticas falhas ?
Responder a uma pergunta sobre uma central em concreto com possiveis erros/falhas em outras não é resposta de mapeador.
DiogoBaptista98 (2024-01-08 00:34:50+00:00): a outra falha em questão é usar o name para descrever o estado de um objecto, o que não cumpre com as recomendações da comunidade, referindo-o como estando em construção "Parque Solar X (em construção)" quando no OSM existe a tag landuse=construction .
topolusitania (2024-01-08 00:50:21+00:00): Ah! Erros meu, má fortuna.
Importas te de reverter o que apagaste?
Não contestaste uma das fontes de informação - a propria EDP Renovaveis- 
Algo me diz que a tua survey não foi o suficientemente diligente e que o Sentinel não tem a definição necessária para sustentar a tua tese que a Central Solar Cercal é um fantasma da minha imaginação
topolusitania (2024-01-08 13:39:17+00:00): Para quem tenha dúvidas sobre o tema  e preguiça de ir procurar informação: https://expresso.pt/economia/economia_energia/2023-09-26-EDP-poe-em-operacao-a-sua-maior-central-solar-em-Portugal-d581cb9d
DiogoBaptista98 (2024-01-08 17:55:46+00:00): Peço que te informes melhor e faças leituras mais cuidadas porque quem está a demonstrar preguiça não sou certamente eu. Sobre a central da cerca a noticia refere claramente a abertura apenas da primeira fase da central que corresponde aos poligonos 1211147256 e 1211147255 corretamente mapeados e que nao foram por mim eliminados. Sobre as areas por mim eliminadas e que nao tenciono em reverter sem qualquer fonte clara e factual, fi-lo porque correspondem a fontes claras e inequívocas sobre a realidade, tanto o survey como o recurso a imagens sentinel nítidas e atualizadas, que demonstram que a central da cerca, a segunda fase ao lado da mata das virtudes, bem como outras que eliminei e que estranhamente nem falaste delas, não existem nem estão em construção.
topolusitania (2024-01-08 23:35:26+00:00): Para que conste e verificar quem não respeita o trabalho dos outros:
 https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145966832
topolusitania (2024-01-08 23:38:37+00:00): Ah, e na tua edição corrigi a tag landuse de industrial para construction. Não apaguei nada. 
pois o parque, segundo as tuas palavras,  esta em construção e não acabado...
DiogoBaptista98 (2024-01-09 00:20:44+00:00): Gostava de perceber a referencia ao Parque Escalabis que entra aqui em discussão quando nao era esse o objecto da conversa. Mais ainda gostava de perceber a tirada "quem não respeita o trabalho dos outros"
topolusitania (2024-01-09 00:43:27+00:00): Rapazinho:
Quando chegares ao 2º milhão de alterações no mapa, avisa-me. Até lá não te vou responder. Pode ser que na altura já tenhas ganho algum juízo
SomeoneElse (2024-01-10 01:39:14+00:00): Hello topolusitania,
OpenStreetMap is a shared project that we have to work on together.  
You need to apologise to DiogoBaptista98 for what you said above.
If you don't, we will take further action.  
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
SomeoneElse (2024-01-10 01:39:36+00:00): Olá toplusitânia,
OpenStreetMap é um projeto compartilhado no qual temos que trabalhar juntos.
Você precisa pedir desculpas a DiogoBaptista98 pelo que disse acima.
Caso contrário, tomaremos outras medidas.
Atenciosamente,
Andy Townsend, em nome do Grupo de Trabalho de Dados do OSM
ThomR (2024-01-18 14:23:43+00:00): Bonjour, 
Pourriez-vous confirmer si le laboratoire (node 11497400032) est bien localisé à cet emplacement ?
GanderPL (2024-06-27 18:56:01+00:00): building=warehouse - jest to podstawowy tag do oznaczenia budynku magazynowego
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145995309
Langlaeufer (2024-02-05 21:39:59+00:00): Hallo Maik,
die Fußwege sind separat eingezeichnet, sidewalk:xxxx=separate war somit korrekt.
Ich habe es wieder hergestellt.
Grüße
Frank
HikeAndMap (2024-04-08 06:51:25+00:00): Hi there, may I ask why you changed the colour:pole into pole:colour?

It is my understanding that we need consistency on OSM?

We have colour:back, colour:text, colour:border, etc.

So why would we do pole:colour now suddenly instead of colour:pole?

I thank you in advance for explaining this to me.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145996139
mueschel (2024-04-08 07:30:11+00:00): Hi,
the reason why I noticed the tagging: colour:pole and colour:support are not in use, but pole:colour and support:colour are.

But there is also a logical reason why it makes sense. The main feature is a sign. It has several colors, so subkeys are used. colour:text, colour:back as you mentioned. 

The support and pole are additional features which are not strictly part of the sign itself, so all tags concerning them are grouped in a namespace with all tags starting with pole:* or support:*. 

We do the same in many other cases, e.g. highways:   The highway gets a "surface" tag, and the sidewalk gets a "sidewalk:surface" tag.
HikeAndMap (2024-04-09 01:34:08+00:00): Hi thank you for taking time to explain it! It makes sense, yeah thank you so much..

I was wondering already in the past how do you know which colour belongs to which part? LOL

So thank you so much for explaining it.
HikeAndMap (2024-04-08 06:52:50+00:00): Same here, why would we do pole:colour instead of colour:pole 

but we do colour:text, colour:back, colour:border, etc.

Seems inconsistent to me.. maybe it's not, maybe there's a logical reason which I'd like to know. Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145996146
mueschel (2024-04-08 07:29:07+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145996139
canfe (2024-01-07 18:51:12+00:00): Come mai hai messo il footway a layer -1 ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145996222
jqngarcia (2024-01-07 17:17:57+00:00): Clauido he visto que has revertido la información de este platform, no hay problema porque tu debes tener mas información local que yo, pero comentarte que amenity=shelter para public transport está en desuso, verás en la wiki que el uso correcto es 
highway=platform shelter=yes

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dplatform

Salud y Mapas, JQN
claudiopereira (2024-01-07 17:24:28+00:00): Mi atención se centró en la reversión del punto de parada, no tanto en el refugio (que simplemente reverti a las etiquetas anteriores una vez que reasigné las etiquetas al punto de parada). No me foco en los refugios, aunque preferiría que estuvieran bien señalizados pero que es algo que puede ser hecho.


Voy a dar más información en su otro comentario.


Gracias
mstrbrid (2025-03-17 19:10:29+00:00): Hi Adam, it's a little while since this edit, but I've picked up your fixme on way 521614195. It's only a footway=sidewalk, without cycle designation along this stretch so it was mapped correctly previously.
As for the cycle map you used as a source, is that the open access dataset off opendata.bristol.gov.uk? If so, I've found it to be seriously out of date and missing loads of information so I'd use it with a fistful of salt!
On a general point, what's your thinking behind changing pavements (footways) to cycleways? Surely their primary function is as a pedestrian "sidewalk" with cycle designation added, ie: highway=footway;footway=sidewalk;bicycle=yes/designated;segregated=no ? Mapping them as cycleways surely overstates the provision for cyclists, no?