piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
txemt (2025-05-13 03:22:42+00:00): It is, but that's the question I'm asking. On both segments, you split them and then labeled them same. I'll use the SW to NE segment of W Lucas Drive to explain this: On the entrance segment, you put lanes=2 when in fact, it's lanes=3 & turn:lanes=left||. Both sections of road between the frontage roads are 3 lanes in each direction. If you take a look at https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=30.117258000000007&lng=-94.145261&z=18.531890114392553&focus=photo&menu=false&pKey=159658462751972&x=0.3467991935143896&y=0.6266515857838755&zoom=0, you'll clearly see that. Even looking at Google's streetview, you can clearly see 3 lanes in both directions, https://www.google.com/maps/@30.1173584,-94.1450123,3a,75y,234.17h,85.36t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s0qtRT3VFffTaSwuEmvM8cg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D4.641150981906492%26panoid%3D0qtRT3VFffTaSwuEmvM8cg%26yaw%3D234.1721350516607!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDUxMS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D

I had proposed to Kinsio (a week ago) that segment could theoretically be a lanes=5
lanes:forward=2
lanes:backward=2 turn:lanes:both_ways=left
skquinn (2025-05-13 03:31:37+00:00): I have fixed the lane counts and lane use after looking at Bing Streetside. If the road is physically divided, making the lane count and lane use edits you suggest would be incorrect. It would be only slightly better to do lanes=6 lanes:forward=3 lanes:backward=3 turn:lanes:forward=left|| turn:lanes|backward=left|| but even this would technically be incorrect for a physically divided road segment.
txemt (2025-05-13 03:49:11+00:00): True, but that’s not what’s on there., that was hypothetical . What is wrong is that you split that and put lanes=2 when it CLEARLY shows lanes=3 in both directions.
skquinn (2025-05-13 04:16:35+00:00): What I think had happened was I made an incorrect note when surveying (it is common in some rural areas for the turn lanes to begin halfway across the underpass as I had previously mapped). Anyway it should be all fixed now.
JLZIMMERMANN (2025-08-13 10:04:41+00:00): bonjour,
j'ai supprimé l'emprise et ajouté un Mc Donald's qui a été inauguré en mai 2025
Codata_PB (2025-08-13 13:12:36+00:00): Bonjour, je vous remercie
vietnam321 (2025-05-08 10:16:35+00:00): It's "add...on...", I'm sorry for this mistake.
rskedgell (2025-05-08 14:28:58+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

A highway tagged as highway=cycleway is already mixed usage, as the default access assumption is foot=yes + bicycle=yes. People often add foot=yes, but unless foot=no is set it's shared usage. All this does is change the rendering to give the incorrect impression that it is a pedestrian-only route.

I'm not sure why you changed the surveyed (by me, in Jan 2023) value of surface=paving_stones to the imprecise value of paved. I'm also unsure why you removed oneway=no, or added layer=-1 when it is not beneath any other map features.

Finally, the name tag is for the actual name of a feature. Descriptive "names" should not be used, but there is a description tag you can use if you feel it is needed.
rskedgell (2025-05-08 14:32:05+00:00): That segment isn't in a tunnel, either - perhaps cutting=yes could be added to the descending ramp (and as a ramp, it's incline=down).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cutting
rskedgell (2025-05-12 08:34:16+00:00): No response to comment after 4 days, reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166139741
Frans S (2025-05-27 10:17:25+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A small remark.
When you want to map a building, partly hidden by trees, just extrapolate the roofline rather than following the tree line. 
Check this page .
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1384555318/history#map=19/19.738834/96.223548

Best regards
wies1 (2025-05-08 10:55:55+00:00): Hallo,

in diesem Changeset hast Du Gebäude zu "einem" Gebäude zusammengefasst, welche im Kataster des Kanton Bern als zwei Gebäude dargestellt sind, wenn diese auch zusammenhängen.

Was ist der Grund für diese Vorgehensweise ? 

Meiner Meinung nach ist es sinnvoller die Gebäude im Kanton Bern so zu erfassen, wie es im Kataster der Fall ist. Zudem lassen sich die beiden zusammenhängenden Gebäude gut als building=house erfassen.

Gruss
wies1
Beat Kaeser (2025-05-13 07:19:58+00:00): Hallo wies1

Wenn ich Gebäude zusammenfasse, dann deshalb weil ich vor Ort nur ein Bauwerk mit einem Grundriss gesehen habe. Ich denke, OSM hat das Ziel, die Gegebenheiten so darzustellen, wie man sie auch vor Ort vorfindet. Es bleibt die Frage, warum im Kataster zwei Gebäude dargestellt sind, wo doch nur ein Bauwerk zu erkennen ist. Wenn es da Unterschiede gibt, gebe ich der direkten Beobachtungen den Vorzug. 

Gruss, Beat
habi (2025-05-28 08:16:52+00:00): Hey Beat
Mehrmals wurdest du schon an verschiedenen Orten angesprochen, dass du Gebäude bitte nicht zusammenfassen sollst, wenn diese präzis erfasst wurden.
Kannst du mit dem bitte aufhören!
Gruss,
habi
OSMDoudou (2025-05-08 11:30:26+00:00): Hello, Not sure how to tag this, but according to this blog post [1], Venus artwork replaces Memento but isn't there to stay after August. Maybe add a Note tag or play with the start_date / end_date tags ?

[1] https://monsblog.be/information/la-venus-de-tournon-exposee-au-campus-fucam-batiment-djusquau-17-aout-2025/
silversurfer83 (2025-05-08 20:13:28+00:00): Hi

jetzt muss ich mal fragen, was alle mit diesem Weg haben?

Ich bin mir recht sicher, dass hier ein VZ240 steht. Also ein gemeinsamer Rad- und Fußweg. Das Wiki ist da recht klar, dass diese Art Weg, wenn nichts anderes dort unterwegs ist, ein highway=path + foot/bike=designated sein sollte. Es ist zumindest die Variante, die idR genutzt wird und gerade hier in der Gegend um Korbach halte ich das auch so, dass ich VZ240 stringent entsprechend tagge.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath

Ich bitte a) um Erklärung (du bist der zweite NVV account in kurzer Zeit, der das macht) und b) um "Korrektur".

Vielen Dank 
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165974515
silversurfer83 (2025-07-21 19:45:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169261531
Roma Megalopolis (2025-12-14 20:29:55+00:00): Dovrebbe essere il prolungamento di Viale Giorgio Cingoli.
dieterdreist (2025-12-14 23:51:28+00:00): dovresti essere più specifico, non capisco a quale punto o way ti riferisci
dieterdreist (2025-12-14 23:52:26+00:00): questo? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679624858
bxl-forever (2025-05-08 11:29:57+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for adding a clothes shop.
Please ALWAYS write a description when you push data to the OSM database. It is not acceptable to leave this field blank, as if you wanted to hide what you are doing.
Thanks in advance.
maro21 (2025-05-11 20:33:38+00:00): Szopa o wysokości metra naprawdę ma adres?
AzkelPL (2025-05-12 08:35:42+00:00): Naprawdę to nie ma - rozbiłem ten budynek na dwa osobne, gdyż znajduje się on na dwóch osobnych działkach, z czego jedna ma adres na ulicy JBDC a druga na Mianowskiego.
mike140 (2025-05-24 18:26:56+00:00): Доброго дня! Так скільки ж там будинків - 1 чи 3? І така назва там не потрібна - її можна хіба що в опис (description)
eggie (2025-05-08 15:02:29+00:00): Dag Robbre.. Volgens mij is al het water weg?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=165975802

Er is daar geen water?

MVG
eggie
robbre (2025-05-08 15:08:28+00:00): zou het zo wel werken ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165988731#map=19/52.363686/6.110474

ik had expres  nakijken even aangezet. Als je nog wat weet te verbeteren graag, dan kijk ik wel wat je hebt veranderd en leer ik weer wat
rskedgell (2025-05-08 14:15:02+00:00): Thanks for updating this.

For closed businesses, etc. the usual way to mark them as such is to change name to old_name and use a lifecycle prefix on the feature's main tag. In this case, it might be:
old_name=Driving Test Centre
disused:office=government

Lifecycle prefixes are documented at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
CompleteMappit (2025-05-12 10:26:54+00:00): Much appreciated, I have updated it.
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-11 15:06:11+00:00): Hello,

there is a guideline called "name is the name only". Which means descriptions such as "ברז מים", "מבנה ביזנטי", etc shouldn't be in the name tag, but in other tags if possible, or in the "description" if a human-readable description is wanted or needed.

The "name" is for real names like "ירושלים", "שביל ישראל", "מצפור הטייסת", etc.

For example, this is a place where the name currently isn't a name:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12819122059

The guideline is here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Name_is_the_name_only
rempshaener (2025-05-08 16:47:02+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Wie bereits bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165111272 geschrieben, werden nur wenige Automaten „auf der Karte“ gerendert. Das Erstellen und benamen eines Gebäudes ist hier Taggen für den Renderer (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%Bcr_den_Renderer).
Ich möchte dich bitten, das in den nächsten Tagen wieder zurückzubauen, einschließlich der Adresse.
Bitte melde dich, wenn du Fragen dazu hast.

Viele Grüße
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-10 12:41:59+00:00): ברוכים הבאים ל-OSM ותודה על התרומה!

הוספתם שני פארקים, אחד בשם "נעמי שמר" ואחד בשם "זלדה שניאורסון". שתי הערות לגביהם:

א. השם של הפארקים הוא שם הרחובות ליד. האם זאת טעות או בכוונה?

ב. שני הפארקים נמצאים בתוך פארק אחד גדול יותר. האם יכול להיות שפשוט יש רק פארק אחד גדול, ויצרתם שניים בתוכו בטעות?

מומלץ גם לקרוא את הנחיות המיפוי:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HE:Israel
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-16 15:43:37+00:00): מאחר שלא היה מענה, החזרתי את מצב הפארקים לקדמותו https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166357517
os-emmer (2025-05-09 17:56:57+00:00): Hello Felixcollins and welcome to OSM!
It seems taht you added an address here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/497457762
It is located in the middle of London but you added addr:country=Netherlands. Could you please check that out? Please use "GB" for Great Brittain and "NL" for the Netherlands.
Kees 59 (2025-05-11 19:54:58+00:00): Additional information: This https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2743101314 is a node with the Amsterdam address , located in Amsterdam
os-emmer (2025-05-11 20:01:50+00:00): Thanks for the context. I think now it is sve to say that the tags got added by accident. I just removed the tags from the node:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166124697
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-05-08 11:08:46+00:00): Hi Bentar, 
this changeset broke 20 coastlines. Are you aware of the issue, do you plan to continue with the changes in the area, or should this changeset be reverted in order to fix the broken coastlines issue
Brentar (2025-05-08 16:47:21+00:00): Hi Aleksandar Matejevic,

Thank you for reaching out. I'm aware and still working on this relation. I uploaded two changeset today and when I was trying to upload a final changeset, i started getting conflicts. I will keep you informed when my edits are completed.

Thank you
Happy Mapping!
Brentar (2025-05-08 18:00:57+00:00): I have reverted this changeset back to the previous state due to some conflicts.
Revert changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165995524

Thanks for reaching out with your concerns and patience.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-08 11:10:56+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1384469346
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1384572319

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-05-08 13:07:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
feedback  landsue=residential geeft grofweg de bebouwing aan.  Het heeft niet zozeer met routeren te maken. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
danieldegroot2 (2025-05-08 16:08:59+00:00): Hei AndrisS, (angļu teksts zemāk)

Nav atļauts izmantot Google Street View vai līdzīgus avotus, kuriem ir autortiesības/īpašumtiesības, kuriem ir noteikti izmantošanas ierobežojumi vai kuri (summējot) veido datubāzi (tīmekļa vietni/sarakstu/lapu).

Skatīt šādas lapas
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility

Ja citos jūsu veiktajos izmaiņu komplektos ir izmantoti šādi avoti, jums ir jāpieprasa tos atgriezt (atsaukt), sazinoties ar Datu darba grupu (DWG).
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group#I.27ve_seen_a_problem.3B_what_should_I_do.3F

Turklāt pienācīgi aprakstiet veiktās izmaiņas. Tas atvieglo izmaiņu izpratni un pārbaudi.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Ja neesat pārliecināts, kuri avoti ir piemēroti, ja jums ir kādi jautājumi vai vēlaties citādi apspriest savus labojumus utt.
varat sazināties ar vietējo kopienu
https://openstreetmap.community/?map=56.94057,24.88577&zoom=5.95
(Jūsu izmaiņu kopuma informācija man norāda, ka, visticamāk, esat no Latvijas, tāpēc esmu precizējis saiti, lai tā dotos uz turieni, nevis uz Īriju).

Vai jūs varētu atbildēt uz šo komentāru, lūdzu? Tas ir tāpēc, lai citi kartētāji zinātu, ka esat to izlasījis un saprotat.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

---

It is not allowed to use Google Street View or similar sources which are copyright / proprietary, have certain usage restrictions, or (when added up) form a database(website/list/sheet).

See the following pages
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility

If any other changesets you have made are using such source, you should request them to be reverted(rolled back) by contacting the Data Working Group (DWG).
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group#I.27ve_seen_a_problem.3B_what_should_I_do.3F

Also, properly describe the changes you are making. This makes it easier to understand and verify changes.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

If you are unsure what sources are okay, have any questions, or want to otherwise discuss your edits etc.
you can contact the local community
https://openstreetmap.community/?map=56.94057,24.88577&zoom=5.95
(Your changeset details tell me you are likely from latvia, so I have specified the link to go there instead of Ireland)

Could you reply to this comment, please? This is so other mappers know you have read and understand it.

Regards,

Daniel

---

This changeset has been reverted in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165990874

Ref https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3726338
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-30 06:02:59+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166953369
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-08 14:02:37+00:00): есть же песочница :( В пару кликов в настройках JOSM включается
eggie (2025-05-08 13:11:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-05-08 13:14:42+00:00): Voor openingstijden kun je het beste deze tool gebruiken. Nu klopt de format niet.
Het resultaat plak je dan achter opening_hours.
openingsuren-tool

http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

MVG
eggie
ezekielf (2025-05-30 17:05:18+00:00): Hi Aleksandar,  it looks like starting in this changeset, and then in a series of others following, you removed `natural=coastline` from a lot of ways and then added it to others going through open water.  This moved the location of the coastline significantly and halted global coastline processing.   It looks like these changes may need to all be reverted to resolve this.   This is currently being discussed on the forum:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/130749

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/130412
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-05-30 18:06:50+00:00): Thanks for the info about forum discussion, I have replyed over there
eggie (2025-05-08 13:36:06+00:00): Dag Hisuhan..
Heeft de groentenboer ook een naam.
Probeer ook bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnodes.
Volgens het Kadster is nr 87  heel ergens anders.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-08 13:40:50+00:00): Ik heb de winkel verwijderd. Die is hier niet. 
gr eggie
hisuhan (2025-05-08 17:30:57+00:00): Bridge Trading Company; i've been there twice; a store where they sell african goods
eggie (2025-05-08 17:38:34+00:00): Okay.. but not in this building. This number is somewhere else.
Look for the housenumber and tag name= and shop=... at that very spot.

Greetz..
eggie
hisuhan (2025-05-08 17:47:15+00:00): well the address is
Hemelrijken 87, 5612 LB Eindhoven
eggie (2025-05-08 18:36:08+00:00): Done...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2777943393

gr eggie
JamJar II (2025-09-07 11:03:29+00:00): Not sure this should be on OpenStreetMap? By definition, wild camps in Scotland are transitory, not designated spots.
bxl-forever (2025-05-08 15:03:37+00:00): ### REVERTED

You added a duplicate POI for this clothes shop, after having uploaded it 2 hours earlier on the same day.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12819086502/history

The duplicate item has been reverted.
eggie (2025-05-08 13:31:38+00:00): Dag Arjo.. Je paden heb ik wat uitgelijnd mbv de  BGT transparant.
MVG
eggie
trigpoint (2025-05-10 19:45:09+00:00): What is the source of this post partner edit?

Cheers Phil
Blue Clip (2025-05-11 12:00:14+00:00): https://www.anpost.com/Store-Locator/Gavins
trigpoint (2025-05-11 12:21:40+00:00): Did you obtain permission to reproduce that information as otherwise you are in breach of the terms of use for the website.
trigpoint (2025-05-11 12:24:35+00:00): https://www.anpost.com/Terms-of-Use particularly paragraph 3.
trigpoint (2025-05-11 12:55:22+00:00): Openstreetmap can only use opendat, or data we have specific permission to use.

The obvious gold standard is 'I went there and I saw it'. Just because something is on a website intended for personal use does not make it opendata.
eggie (2025-05-08 13:28:37+00:00): Arjo... Je vraagt feedback. 
Lijkt me oke..

Er zijn nog meer paden hier die ontbraken. Ik heb wat toegevoegd.

MVG
eggie
DutchArjo (2025-05-09 07:58:48+00:00): Ja er ontbreekt nog heel veel. Ik voeg maar toe waar ik zelf tegenaan loop. Het is niet te doen om alles wat hier mist er structureel in te zetten voor mij.

Je zou een recorder moeten hebben die alle paadjes waar je overheen gaat opneemt en gelijk aan OSM toevoegt. Ik heb wel gpx van paden die gelopen heb en die in OSM nog niet bekend zijn maar ik weet niet of die zo ingelezen kunnen worden.
eggie (2025-05-09 08:09:17+00:00): Hoi...
Gpx tracks kun je in uploaden in de editor iD. Bv als prive tracks. Dat is het beste.
Dan kun je ze vervolgens openen in de editmodus van iD.
Je kunt de lijntjes dan overtrekken en de juiste wegklasse taggen.
Ik werk met josm en laad de gpx tracks gewoon op de kaart. 

Dan wel nog overtrekken. 😀

Mapse..
eggie
eggie (2025-05-09 08:11:29+00:00): In editor josm kun je ze direct inladen vanuit je gps apparaat via openen.
Dan nog even een gebied downloaden. Het wijst zichzelf.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-10 11:26:11+00:00): Hey, not sure why this changeset inexplicably added a link to Google Maps for the description=* for this SEO spam POI, but I ended up nuking all these tags in changeset 183918575 as the changeset was explicitly Google Maps `source=*`, blatant SEO spam, and didn't make any logical sense vandalizing a residential building with these business tags (for a different address, to boot).

https://osm.org/changeset/183918575
ilias_ (2025-05-08 19:28:18+00:00): Please use more detailed changeset comments - not "update"
redd (2025-06-11 11:08:21+00:00): Hi Torsten Holmer,
danke für deinen Beitrag. Das verlinkte Image zeigt nur einen Baum aber wurde an dutzenden Bäumen verwendet. War das ein Versehen?

Grüße,

redd
redd (2025-06-11 11:09:16+00:00): wäre eventuell klarer nur die Kategorie zu verlinke?
Torsten Holmer (2025-06-11 11:26:50+00:00): Ich habe eine Reihe von Bäumen eingefügt, um unser 3D-Modell realistischer zu machen. Ich verstehe Deinen Kommentar nicht ganz. Vielleicht habe ich noch einen Baum hinzugefügt, aber dann den Plural verwendet?

LG
Torsten
redd (2025-06-11 11:51:07+00:00): Hi,
genau an all diesen Bäumen ist das folgende Tag gesetzt:

 image=image	https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Naturdenkmal_Seidenakazie_Elsasser_Stra%C3%9Fe_Dresden#/media/File:Naturdenkmal_Seidenakazie_Elsasser_Stra%C3%9Fe_Dresden_1.JPG 

Dieses Foto zeigt aber nur einen einzelnen Baum. Die ist nicht im Sinne des image-Tags. Das image-Tag sollte besser das tatsächliche Objekt anzeigen und nicht etwas anderes. 

Wenn es dir unklar ist, würde ich vorschlagen, dass du alle image-Tags von deinen Bäumen löscht.

Vielen Dank,

redd
Torsten Holmer (2025-06-11 11:56:11+00:00): Ah, ok, das habe ich gar nicht gesehen. Ich habe nur ein bestehendes Baum-Symbol kopieren wollen und nicht gesehen, dass da ein image-Tag dran war.
Ich korrigiere das ;-)
redd (2025-06-11 11:58:27+00:00): oh.. dann ist der Fehler ja noch schlimmer als befürchtet.. Vielen Dank, dass du es korrigieren willst. Bitte alle Tags überprüfen! Bei Fragen gerne melden, dann kann ich auch unterstützen
Torsten Holmer (2025-06-11 12:24:22+00:00): Gibt es eine einfache Möglichkeit, "meine" Bäume zu finden?
redd (2025-06-11 17:59:40+00:00): Ja,  alle deine 152 Bäume sind hier im Changeset aufgelistet unter den Kommentaren unter "Knoten"
Torsten Holmer (2025-06-12 10:04:56+00:00): gibt es eine einfache Möglichkeit, dass für alle meine Bäume gleichzeitig zu machen oder muss ich jeden von Hand einzeln bearbeiten?
redd (2025-11-09 12:20:58+00:00): ja, man kann alle Bäume anklicken und gleichzeitig ändern
eggie (2025-05-08 13:18:12+00:00): Dag Lucca... 'k Denk dat het stuwtje toch wel klopt.
MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2025-05-10 07:01:25+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/30719407. what is the mean of the tag name:ua = Кривлин? Please notice the difference between the language code uk and the country code UA.
ivanbranco (2025-05-08 13:17:31+00:00): Attenzione, spostando il cafe avevi anche spostato il civico 13, che ora risultava dietro al civico 13a.

Dovrei aver sistemato, buon mapping
Gustavo Javier Lopez (2025-05-08 12:51:04+00:00): Por favor revisar los límites de la Planta Pacheco. No tengo acceso a actualizar los límites o no sé cómo hacerlo.
citrula (2025-05-08 14:48:03+00:00): you added your business details to the roadway. Please do the tutorial in the editor and try again.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165987826
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-10 12:53:05+00:00): נא לכתוב תיאור טוב יותר כדי להקל על הבדיקות של ממפים אחרים
yt2178 (2025-05-15 00:56:47+00:00): אוקיי
user_5359 (2025-05-09 10:18:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Your business isn't part of a street. I revert you change set.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-17 02:25:25+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718616
osmmapper222 (2025-05-09 10:46:47+00:00): Hallo BuschGH,

die Adressen sind hier redundant erfasst: pro Gebäude und jeweils mit einem Address-Node innerhalb der Gebäude.

Für das Tagging sind laut OSM-Wiki beide Varianten möglich: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Adressen

Welchen Vorteil siehst du darin, die Adressen doppelt zu erfassen?
onovy (2025-06-08 11:58:08+00:00): Ahoj,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12819603695/history/1

prosím o dodržování pravidel:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Elektrick%C3%A1_veden%C3%AD

Děkuji.
czebureks (2025-12-09 13:59:32+00:00): Cześć! Czy do tego w węzła: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9146642068 nie pasuje może bardziej tag "information=trail_blaze"? Pozdrawiam