piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tbicr (2023-01-31 09:58:55+00:00): Yep, my bad with comment, will try to keep it clear next time, thanks.
PT-53 (2023-02-24 07:39:44+00:00): Hallo KSt,
Du hast diesen Weg
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1136527410/history
neu eingezeichnet. Dieser überdeckt teilwiese diesen Weg:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19825119/history
Da liegen also teilweise 2 Wege übereinander, was nicht sein sollte.

Bereinigst Du das oder soll ich das für Dich übernehmen?

Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.
PT-53 (2023-03-12 07:34:32+00:00): Hallo KSt, 
ich würde mich noch über einen Antwort freuen.
Grüße
Stretch Longfellow (2023-02-12 21:31:40+00:00): This edit seems to be made in error. US Highways do not actually pass through Yellowstone (yes, it's weird); they terminate at the gate and resume on the other side. Also, hyphens are never used in ref tags. Please revert. Thank you!
Joseph R P (2023-03-03 04:32:29+00:00): I've reverted this and the edit made prior to this one by the user. Apparently, they were copying Google Maps data: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131891902
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-02 17:16:39+00:00): But what is weird is they show up under TIGER 2021.  So I am not sure if construction is just planned and hasn't started yet?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131893295
lvf1123 (2023-02-02 22:41:06+00:00): I’m not sure what the builders are planning but no progress has been made there in at least 2 years and there is no construction equipment on site
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-02 22:49:38+00:00): Ah, got it.  Thanks for clarifying!
eggie (2023-01-30 19:26:18+00:00): Dag Olivier

De combinatie foot=yes met access=no is bijna altijd verkeerd.
Wellicht kun je beter vehicle=no taggen en access=no verwijderen.

MVG
eggie
ivanbranco (2023-01-31 09:13:58+00:00): Ciao oceanic817, bevenut su OSM

mi sembra improbabile che un solo sushi occupi un intero edificio multipiano a Roma. Quando un elemento non occupa l'intero edificio bisogna mapparlo come nodo (punto) individuale.

Buon mapping e grazie per l'edit
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-06 18:01:01+00:00): what is highway=virtual?
Mar4s (2023-04-06 22:17:07+00:00): highway used only for the purpose of routing -> not widely used anymore, since highway can be areas
Hopla57 (2023-01-30 19:20:39+00:00): Autre source : http://mairie-de-coincy.e-monsite.com/medias/files/cr-du-cm-du-25-novembre-2022.pdf
syntex (2023-01-30 22:11:47+00:00): wandalizm, wycofane
syntex (2023-01-30 22:11:52+00:00): wandalizm, wycofane
NorthCrab (2023-01-31 12:46:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Niekompletne dane adresowe, brakuje nazwy miasta.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10577846778

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab (2023-01-31 12:48:06+00:00): Usunąłem ten adres ponieważ dodanie go było chyba czyjąś pomyłką. Jest to duplikat z budynku obok. Pozdrawiam!
SzymonH (2023-01-31 13:46:36+00:00): No właśnie, ostatnio nie dodaję adresów do automatów dlatego się zdziwiłem o co chodzi xd
NorthCrab (2023-01-31 13:51:28+00:00): Powiadamiam również jeśli "dotnieksz" obiekt z uszkodzonym adresem. Istnieje wtedy większa szansa że ten błąd zostanie poprawiony. Nie powiadamiam wyłącznie osób dodających błędne adresy.

Więcej o moim działaniu znajdziesz na - https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/abakus-uploader-osm-addr-bot-napisalem-alternatywe/8423

Pozdrawiam!
PT-53 (2023-01-31 16:14:27+00:00): Hallo Interteutones,
ein Service-Weg der nur an einen Feldweg angeschlossen ist. Paßt das schon so?
Fragende Grüße
Interteutones (2023-01-31 17:33:47+00:00): Hallo,

ja, passt. Schau mal da:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=service

Beste Grüße
Der Interteutones
PT-53 (2023-01-31 17:49:11+00:00): Nein, das paßt nicht!
Interteutones (2023-01-31 21:06:05+00:00): Warum?
PT-53 (2023-02-02 09:06:04+00:00): DE:Tag:highway=track
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrack

Auszug:
>>  highway=track wird nicht für kleine, auch unbefestigte Straßen innerhalb bebauter Flächen oder für unbefestigte Ortsverbindungsstraßen verwendet. Sind dies keine Wirtschaftswege, sondern Zufahrts- oder Verbindungsstraßen, ist ein geeigneter höherer Wert einzusetzen, zum Beispiel highway=service oder highway=unclassified. Die Art der Oberfläche sollte möglichst immer durch surface=* angegeben werden.  <<

Das
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/91564721#map=16/50.3760/6.2698
ist am Anfang die Zufahrt zu einem landw. Betrieb > Weg entspr. auftrennen und  Abschnitt, der an die Honsfeld-Straße einmündet zu Service hochstufen.

Grüße
Interteutones (2023-02-02 16:07:47+00:00): ...hat geklappt.

Der Interteutones
syntex (2023-01-30 22:11:56+00:00): wandalizm, wycofane
PT-53 (2023-01-31 14:02:07+00:00): Hallo Interteutones,
welches Luftbild hast Du denn für die gebäudekontour verwendet.
Bitte immer die korrekte Quelle angeben.

Soll ich so weitermachen?
Interteutones (2023-01-31 15:00:46+00:00): Hallo und Danke für deine Nachricht.

Du kannst natürlich hinsichtlich des Luftbildes weitere Angaben machen. Es ist aber kein Muß. 

Beste Grüße
Der Interteutones
PT-53 (2023-01-31 13:58:29+00:00): Hallo Interteutones,
wie kann man auf einem Luftbild (welches war es denn genau ?) sehen, daß bei dieser Zufahrt ein Verkehrszeichen "Privat" steht?
Fragende Grüße
Interteutones (2023-01-31 14:57:46+00:00): Du siehst es nicht auf dem Luftbild. Du siehst es aber vor Ort. War mit dem Rad dort unterwegs.

Beste Grüße
Der Interteutones
syntex (2023-01-30 22:11:58+00:00): wandalizm, wycofane
syntex (2023-01-30 22:12:01+00:00): wandalizm, wycofane
nurdafur (2023-07-10 19:01:14+00:00): Hallo nomimono

Du hast hier an der Lenggiserstrasse, der Kreuzackerstrasse und eventuell noch an anderen Orten auf der einen Strassenseite je einen Fuss- und einen Radweg eingezeichnet. Dies ist gut gemeint, leider nicht korrekt. Es gibt da nur einen Weg. 
Wenn irgendwo an dem Weg ein Rad- und Fusswegsymbol ist, dann sollte dieser Weg folgende Tags bekommen:
highway=path, foot=designated, bicycle=designated, segregated=*.
Wenn es nur die Markierungen auf der Fahrbahn gibt, dann ist wohl eher foot=yes und bicycle=yes zu benutzen.
Natürlich kann noch oneway=yes, surface=*, ... ergänzt werden.
Bitte schau dir das nochmals an und korrigiere das entsprechend. 

Freundliche Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Kartografieren 
Urs
syntex (2023-01-30 22:12:05+00:00): wandalizm, wycofane
syntex (2023-01-30 22:12:07+00:00): wandalizm, wycofane
NorthCrab (2023-01-31 03:40:42+00:00): 👍️
os-emmer (2023-12-21 23:36:57+00:00): Hallo Mapper_99,
du hast hier ein Objekt mit addr:country=SA eingetragen. War das absicht?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489284732
goedegazelle (2023-01-30 20:15:12+00:00): Moet zijn: pad losgemaakt van landschap.
eggie (2023-08-05 12:12:25+00:00): Dag The Wouter   Dit rendert allemaal als fietspad. Dat komt door de tag bicycle=designated  Het is de Duitse manier een een type fietspad aan te duiden.
In Nederland voegen weg gewoon bicycle=yes toe aan een pad als je ere mag fietsen.
Ik heb wat aangepast. Wanneer je nog blauwe fietspaden op de kaart ziet dan graag de rest ook aanpassen.
footway bij een G7 bord  path inderdaad als je er ook mag fietsen
MVG
eggie
wkdgs (2023-01-31 10:01:25+00:00): Sieht gut aus.

Wenn du dir bei einem Tag nicht sicher bist, schau einfach mal ins Wiki. Da gibt es zu eigentlich allen üblichen Tags einen Eintrag. Z.B.:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dreservoir_covered
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131895482
wkdgs (2023-01-31 10:04:27+00:00): Ich glaube du könntest "covered=yes" und "building=yes" ebenfalls entfernen. "man_made=reservoir_covered" impliziert ja, dass es sich um ein überdachtes Gebäude handelt.
NorthCrab (2023-01-31 03:28:56+00:00): Dlaczego ten budynek stał się okrągły? Czy to przpyadkiem?
ChookMan (2023-01-30 20:22:56+00:00): **farnham street
wkdgs (2023-01-31 09:59:25+00:00): Hi,

kannst du "highways=path" wieder zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42769757 hinzufügen, damit die Info welche Art von Objekt es früher einmal war nicht verloren geht?

Wahrscheinlich ist es aber ohnehin besser einen Lebenszykluspräfix zu verwenden als "abandoned=yes":
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Das macht man indem, man vor alle Tags, die betroffen sind den Präfix "abandoned:*" schreibt. Aus "highway=path" würde also "abandoned:highway=path". Da alle Tags sich nur auf den Weg beziehen, müsste der Präfix vor alle Tags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131895604
jordan_osm (2023-02-01 07:36:29+00:00): Ja, prima. Habe Ich gemacht.
emersonveenstra (2023-01-30 21:45:39+00:00): Hi,

Why did you remove the tags from the crossing node and traffic light?
NorthCrab (2023-01-31 03:36:23+00:00): Jak klikniesz "Q" to wyprostuje ci kąty i będziesz mieć idealne prostokąty. Pozdrawiam!
eggie (2023-01-31 10:26:05+00:00): Oke..., maar waarom het je de wandelroute 37-91  opslot gezet met access=no?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131895889
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-01-31 10:26:46+00:00): Ahhh  rustgebed... maar hoe loopt dan nu die wandelroute.. Die is nu onderbroken?
CurlingMan13 (2023-01-30 22:23:39+00:00): Edit looks good! (adjusted hours to be in the correct format).  Thanks for learning how to edit OSM and adding it yourself.  :D
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131896163
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-31 02:02:35+00:00): Blocked & all CS reverted by DWG for vandalism: changeset/131902214
Friendly_Ghost (2023-01-30 22:06:00+00:00): Thank you for modernising the tagging scheme.
Friendly_Ghost (2023-01-30 22:04:03+00:00): Hoi Brul. Ik woon in de buurt, maar ik heb de werkzaamheden zelf nog niet bekeken. Bewerk je de kaart hier alleen op basis van documentatie of heb je hier ook ter plaatse gekeken of ze al echt aan de slag zijn?

Mvg,
Casper
Brul (2023-01-31 16:33:52+00:00): Ze zijn druk aan het werk vanaf 16-01-2023
Eggie dacht dat je zou kunnen helpen bij het weer goed intekenen van het uiteindelijke traject, dat grofweg voorjaat 2024 (!) wordt opgeleverd ?
Friendly_Ghost (2023-01-31 22:22:43+00:00): Waarschijnlijk kan ik daar wel bij helpen, ja, maar ik weet nog niet eens wat ik morgenochtend als ontbijt ga eten, dus het voorjaar van 2024 is voor mij erg ver in de toekomst.
PT-53 (2023-03-12 07:45:38+00:00): Hallo miscosm,
bis wann kann man mit der Freigabe für KFZ rechnen?
Grüße

PS:
Gefunden mit brouter-suspects
miscosm (2023-03-12 15:28:42+00:00): Ist immer noch für KFZ gesperrt, ich weiß auch keinen Termin für die Öffnung
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-01-31 18:57:00+00:00): Please be careful here. These were aligned with official geodesic data. Bing maps in the Montreal area have an average offset of 0.6, -1.54
Please use this offset in the ID editor before changing alignment. I will revert this changeset for now. Thanks for your understanding.
NorthCrab (2023-01-31 12:46:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Niekompletne dane adresowe, brakuje nazwy miasta.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1136263735

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SekeRob (2023-01-31 13:40:13+00:00): Hi

Think you addr-essed this to the wrong person, I merely corrected the adrr key as flagged by New Keys QA and yes noticed the city was missing. The person to give your list to is over at  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131850052 but see another mapper already gave that one a longer reply.

ciao
NorthCrab (2023-01-31 13:45:52+00:00): Hey, I did intend to send this message to you as I believe that if you already work in this area, there is a higher chance of you fixing it, rather than the original contributor. I never said that you are to blame :p. If you don't want to fix it, that's also fine. I just notify people and what they do with this information - it's up to them.

The original message was sent as a part of the automated notification system which intends to replace abakus_uploader (both are Poland-specific).
More info at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/abakus-uploader-osm-addr-bot-napisalem-alternatywe/8423

Cheers!
NorthCrab (2023-01-31 13:47:28+00:00): Anyway, I will correct this issue!
surveyor54 (2023-02-01 09:02:49+00:00): Hallo,
wenn du dir dies einmal durchliest,
erkennst du, dass deine Eingabe 𝘁𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗺=𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗮𝘃𝗮𝗻_𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗲 falsch ist.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism=caravan%20site?uselang=de

Bitte korrigieren.

Gruß
surveyor54
surveyor54 (2023-02-01 09:09:29+00:00): Vielleicht wäre 𝙩𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙞𝙨𝙢=𝙘𝙖𝙢𝙥_𝙥𝙞𝙩𝙘𝙝  angebracht, und den Namen in 𝗿𝗲𝗳=*.
-ad- (2023-02-01 14:07:09+00:00): i guess it's completly correct, see 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcaravan_site
surveyor54 (2023-02-01 16:25:53+00:00): Are any of the following applicable?

Motorhome sites usually differ from a campsite in the following respects:

    You can arrive or depart at any time, even at night.
    There is no reception where you have to sign in or out.
    Sanitary facilities are rarely available and then often limited.
    The pitching of tents, including awnings, is usually not allowed.
    The stay is limited to a few nights, seasonal or permanent camping is not allowed.
    Low overnight rates, some free of charge.

And it's camp_site and not a caravan_site.

https://www.camping-holzmichel.de/index.php/de/
Violaine_Do (2024-11-25 22:28:12+00:00): Merci pour la contribution. Dans le nom, merci de ne pas ajouter "made in". Le nom est le nom affiché sur place. Si on veut savoir qui a ajouté l'info on regarde dans les détails du changeset ;)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131897179
Toni100 (2023-02-02 04:21:51+00:00): Moi! Muutoskokoelma on lähes koko suomen pituinen. Voisiko jatkossa tarkentaa mitä tässä on korjattu/lisätty? Se auttaa myös muita käyttäjiä. Kiitos!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131897703
Gonéo (2023-01-31 09:19:02+00:00): Bonjour, effectivement on ne voit plus ce chemin sur l'imagerie. Si c'est effectivement le cas, alors votre modification est correcte. Merci pour votre contribution.
Udarian (2023-01-31 03:14:38+00:00): Port Miami has many cruise ships that call it home along with allot of cargo throughput and Port Boulevard is the main road servicing it, the point being that an incredible amount of cars pass through here especially on days when cruises board and set sail. Though I an say that this is all wrong because after the intersection of Port Boulevard and FL 887 it is more of a primary or even something smaller capacity, but the main bridge connecting to mainland Miami Dade is in my opinion a trunk road.
Joseph R P (2023-01-31 03:29:15+00:00): It's still a dead-end road though, just like the MIA access road, and for that reason it shouldn't be a trunk road.
eggie (2023-01-31 06:08:26+00:00): Dag alo..
Je vraagt feedback.
Scholen zijn een beetje lastig.
Je zult een keus moeten maken op welk deel je de naam zet. Die staat nu 2x op de kaart.
Dus eén naam kan weg.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2023-01-31 09:29:41+00:00): De schoolinfo van beide instellingen  staat nu op de adresnodes.
Volgens mij mag je https://www.postnl.nl/locatiewijzer/ niet gebruiken als bron. 
Een heg als area=yes gaat niet werken.
Het vult niet op. 
 Beter gewoon één lijnelement gebruiken.
Ik zie hier bobbieplantsoen 13 rondzwerven .. Dat heb ik teruggeplaatst.
Verder een eerste bijdrage in Nederland  daarom Alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
elsy1 (2023-01-31 18:23:06+00:00): اسم خیابان دکتر علی شریعتی است.
Udarian (2023-01-31 03:37:40+00:00): This road only connects retail, commercial and residential areas, I am doubtful that it is a trunk road.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131898640
Joseph R P (2023-01-31 04:05:23+00:00): It's also the fastest and most-important route through the city of Miami Beach, connecting I 195 to the MacArthur Causeway, which are also important routes.
NorthCrab (2023-01-31 03:39:56+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!
Jesteś pewny co do statusu utwardzenia na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1136566209? Paved sugeruje asfalt/kostkę/albo jakieś inne twarde utwardzenie, natomiast ze zdjęć wygląda to na zwykły compacted albo unpaved ogólnie. Dokumentacja paved: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=paved

Pozdrawiam!
Artali (2023-01-31 16:13:47+00:00): Dobry.
Masz rację, jeszcze nie do końca łapię subtelności opisowe obiektów. To na pewno nie jest paved tylko compacted - już poprawiłem. Dzięki za uwagę.
Pozdrowienia
Udarian (2023-01-31 02:47:31+00:00): I am pretty certain that Northwest 25th Street is a trunk road because from what I can tell it serves the purpose of getting cargo out of MIA (and MIA handles massive amounts of cargo every day) and on to the highways (connecting directly to Palmetto Expressway and thus other highways serving Miami Dade, Broward County and others), this meaning that it handles huge amounts of vehicles per day allowing cargo from MIA to not clog up surrounding roads used by others than cargo comming from MIA; after all some of the areas it bypasses are commercial and retail areas. As a note here, the expressway=yes seams, from what I can tell to be accurate but the rest does not. 
the point here being that from what I have read from the wiki this classifies as a trunk road.
Udarian (2023-01-31 02:55:19+00:00): As for Northwest 16th Street I pretty certain that it is tertiary to secondary since it is a smaller road for sued mainly by local employees working in the cargo part of the airport and FEC rails near by and thus would not have all that much traffic go through it.
Joseph R P (2023-01-31 03:00:25+00:00): In the US, trunk classification is for major inter-regional highways, ring roads, and any other non-freeway road that may be just as important as Interstate highways. The viaduct is a very short expressway that doesn't serve anything other than cargo trucks bypassing the surface roads to get to the airport. Secondary might even be too high of a classification for this road, as per what this road actually is used for and why it exists.
Udarian (2023-01-31 03:36:33+00:00): You seam to misunderstand the immense throughput of cargo that MIA produces, it is a trunk road because the unimaginable amount of cars that end up using it. It is short but mighty. the wiki its self sais that they dont have to be long they just have to provide a connection between trunks and highways which this does in the sence that it connect MIA to a major highway in the area and Doral a major industrial and commercial area. quoting from the wiki "In areas of high population density, to expressways that meet most, but not all, of the requirements for highway=motorway, and provide connectivity between motorways and other trunk roads.". This is a highly dense part of Miami,  it is essentially a small highway that just doesn't have enough lanes and throughput to be one; and it near the center of Miami so the are has immense population density
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131898770
Joseph R P (2023-01-31 03:58:57+00:00): Traffic counts should rarely have an affect on the classification on a road because it's not useful for navigational purposes. Trunk classification is for important highways that connect different cities and regions like an Interstate would, and not every expressway or highly-traveled road can be trunk. There is the expressway=* key for high-speed and/or limited-access roads and there are AADT maps to show the traffic counts of roads. Minus motorways, the highway hierarchy on OSM is all about how important the road is relative to the surrounding roads setting aside how many vehicles use it. 25th Street itself is technically more important than the viaduct I'd argue, considering it connects to other secondary roads whereas the viaduct is really only useful for traffic to bypass the surface streets to reach other roads of lesser importance.
Udarian (2023-01-31 04:38:30+00:00): According to the wiki ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=trunk ) a trunk road could also be a road that is almost a highway but does not meet all the criteria necessary to be considered one. From my experience it is just that. The reason I keep going on about throughput is that from my understanding through put is one of the defining characteristics of a highway. And if I remember correctly one of the main reasons this was built was to ease traffic between MIA and Palmetto Expressway (and the surrounding area).
Udarian (2023-01-31 04:41:08+00:00): As a quick note I never complained about the addition of the expressway=yes tagging, in fact I said that I though that doing so was good.
Joseph R P (2023-01-31 04:49:36+00:00): I cannot find where in the article this is quoted, but for the US trunk criteria, it states:

"As the top non-motorway classification, highway=trunk should be applied in the following cases:
In areas of high population density, to expressways that meet most, but not all, of the requirements for highway=motorway, and provide connectivity between motorways and other trunk roads. These roads should also be tagged expressway=yes.
In areas of medium to low population density, to the most important non-motorway roads that provide principal, long-haul connections between population centers of regional importance.
Historically, trunk in the US has been defined based on physical construction, but the 2021 US highway classification project has moved to a definition based on network importance."
Udarian (2023-01-31 04:51:03+00:00): Also, from how I see it, the fact that the viaduct allows truck to bypass that segment of 25th Street and connect to and from MIA to Palmetto Expressway makes it extremely important. I could not imagine the traffic that would be generated at peak times if it did not exist. As I previously stated MIA its self can be though of as a highway at peak times due to the traffic it generates on all sides.
Udarian (2023-01-31 05:18:00+00:00): I was referencing the following: "In areas of high population density, to expressways that meet most, but not all, of the requirements for highway=motorway, and provide connectivity between motorways and other trunk roads. These roads should also be tagged expressway=yes" part
Udarian (2023-01-31 05:20:46+00:00): meet most but not all of the requirements of a highway (paraphrasing) which is why was, as aforementioned, going on about how it is similar to to a highway.
Udarian (2023-01-31 05:23:58+00:00): from how I read that part of the wiki in my head it implies that it is either a short segment that is like a highway but does not meet all criteria to be considered one or a longer segment of road connecting communities.