piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-03-21 04:21:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13666001539 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Water damage restoration office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-29 04:33:17+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180566278
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
nevw (2026-03-21 05:37:18+00:00): You have incorrectly named this park as "eumeralla scout camp"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178474278#map=16/-37.84517/145.11617
Can you correct this or I will revert it.
nevw (2026-03-21 06:28:00+00:00): I have reverted this changeset.
NeisBot (2026-03-21 06:00:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13666155517 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Office building"
---
Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего текста могла бы быть: "Офисное здание"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
ProfElitYchet (2026-03-21 06:55:43+00:00):  "Office building" ок
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
NeisBot (2026-03-21 06:27:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/2756625938 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Event space"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-29 10:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180576372
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
aceman444 (2026-04-03 16:23:32+00:00): Ked je povrch rovnaky pre cyklo aj pesiu cast, a je zadany cez surface, je pridavat footway:surface a cycleway:surface zbytocne.
kuhni74 (2026-03-21 10:04:34+00:00): danke!!!
MK 1 (2026-03-21 06:59:49+00:00): 2/2 and there is a speed limit od 70 kmph, and that is not motorway.
There is a proposal to be built new highway next to way Veles-Katlanovo.
Alexey_ND (2026-03-22 07:59:50+00:00): Приветствую.
Что обозначает линия с тэгом
operator=RU-KDA-38-169/1
???
169 ОП 119 ПСЧ 38 ПСО (2026-04-06 14:05:07+00:00): ошибка, как удалить не знаю
Alexey_ND (2026-04-06 18:33:00+00:00): спасибо понял))
d_berger (2026-03-22 10:49:03+00:00): Hi, you changed this straight section of road to 'roundabout'. Not sure, what OSMI flagged, but I'm certain, this wasn't the issue.

Also keep in mind, that OSMI sometimes has a minor hiccup and doesn't update, so you won't see any changes. HTH
arjunaraoc (2026-03-23 01:11:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180190147
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-27 20:08:28+00:00): have you actually surveyed both locations?
mario-spitze (2026-04-05 18:40:32+00:00): Yea, I'm uploaded some changes a little bit late with StreetComplete.
habi (2026-03-21 15:48:23+00:00): Hey davras
Kannst du bitte einen Moment Pause machen mit dem Importieren der Gebäudehöhen?
Die Schweizer Community ist nicht grundsätzlich dagegen, aber eine Diskussion und Erlärung ist nötig!
Gruss,
Habi
woodpeck (2026-03-21 16:16:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20033
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-23 17:43:13+00:00): Ale https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/359175687 to droga czy ścieżka?

Jak droga polna to można dodać informacje o nawierzchni itp ale zaznaczanie błędnie jako ścieżka jest błędne

dodatkowo na jaką nawigacje narzekasz? Czy wyszukujesz tam trasy dla samochodów czy rowerów czy czegoś innego?
TrickyFoxy (2026-04-03 23:26:02+00:00): 👋  Номера домов нужно не в name записывать, а в addr:housenumber (в редакторе специальное поле под адрес)
pwbriggs (2026-04-24 05:42:06+00:00): Huh. Thanks for investigating!
balle0 (2026-03-21 15:22:45+00:00): The building you added near the station of Carpi has been completely demolished, so I'm going to remove it
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180193626
Poprawiłem (2026-06-30 12:26:57+00:00): Usunięty tag service=driveway jako rodzaj drogi serwisowej całkiem pasuje w przypadku dróg way/24469091 i way/704978085, które służą właściwie do dojazdu do działek, a nie - ze względu na swoją złą nieutrzymywaną nawierzchnię, którą obrazuje tagowanie smoothness=bad + surface=dirt - do tranzytu. Opis zestawu zmian niewłaściwie sugeruje, że rodzaj nawierzchni drogi ma związek z jej przeznaczeniem.
maraf24 (2026-07-01 19:05:23+00:00): 1. Jak dobrze widać i w terenie i tu na mapie te drogi nadają się także do innego zastosowania, do którego nie istnieją dla nich bliskie alternatywy. Dlatego podtag driveway nie jest właściwy, gdyż zaniża ich kategorię. Jeśli ktoś chce, bo ma bliżej, to sobie może nimi jechać nie do działek.
2. Żadna droga service nie jest do tranzytu, więc driveway nic tu nie zmiania.
3. Nieprawdą jest, że sugeruję związek nawierzchni z jej przeznaczeniem - jest dokładnie na odwrót. Napisałem,  iż to, że droga jest nieutwardzona nie powinien wpływać na ich degradację do podjazdu. Bo czy to gdyby tu był asfalt, to zrobiłbyś taką edycję jak poprzednio?
whitepanda (2026-03-23 05:56:04+00:00): Partially Revert of :180094473
silversurfer83 (2026-03-23 20:08:59+00:00): Gude :)

sollte es nicht besser outdoor_seating=yes statt biergarten=yes heißen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180194314
mcliquid (2026-03-26 09:38:31+00:00): Danke dir, hab's angepasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180444653

Wurde vom Duplikat übernommen :)
Op'tRad (2026-03-27 11:05:07+00:00): Hallo Taya,

Bij toeval zag ik die vier streepjes  aan de Geessinkweg 403. Aan de Vleugelweg 1 Hellendoorn ontdekte ik recent, dat er voor zo een inkuilplek een speciale tag bestaat: man_made bunker_silo.

Groet,
Werner, alias Op'tRad
Taya_S (2026-03-27 11:19:21+00:00): Hallo Werner

Bedankt voor de tip. Dat lijkt mij ook iets beter dan een generieke `barrier=wall`. Ik zal het binnenkort aanpassen.

Vriendelijke groet,
Taya
rskedgell (2026-03-21 12:52:58+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for updating this.
Sylabowy Kot (2026-03-21 09:47:53+00:00): + modele 3D
BCNorwich (2026-03-23 07:19:58+00:00): Duplicated nodes removed.
Sebastien Dinot (2026-03-26 13:11:36+00:00): Bonjour @hanimyon,
Je découvre que vous avez supprimé la piste récemment ouverte dans le quartier de Montaudran, entre la résidence Klee et la rue Julien Pranville, pour la remplacer par un nouveau tracé.
Primo, ce n'est pas la bonne façon de procéder. On modifie de préférence l'existant, sauf lorsqu'il est grossièrement faux et compliqué à reprendre. Ce n'était pas le cas ici.
Secundo, vous avez indiqué que cette piste n'était pas ouverte et vous avez supprimé la jonction avec la voie qui se trouve au nord de la rue Julien Pranville. Or, la voie est bien ouverte au public depuis début mars. J'y suis passé à plusieurs reprises. Elle est empruntée par un tas de piétons et de cyclistes.
Je ne vais pas me lancer dans une guerre d'édition et annuler votre changeset. Mais je vous demande de procéder avec un peu plus de délicatesse la prochaine fois que vous voudrez amender des données.
Bien cordialement,
Sébastien Dinot
hanimyon (2026-03-29 15:31:56+00:00): Bonjour,
Je vous remercie de votre remarque. La dernière fois que je suis passé au niveau de la rue J.Pranville & E.Negrin, cette section n'était pas ouverte, et lorsque j'ai vu que les voies cyclables et piétonnes avaient été ajoutés (sur openstreetmap) j'ai cru qu'il s'agissait d'un ajout par anticipation de leur ouverture, puisqu'il n'est pas possible d'ajouter des voies cyclables ou piétonnes en travaux sans passer par l'option "route" en travaux. Aussi, je vous remercie de m'avoir informé de la situation, et vous assure qu'à l'avenir vous pouvez reprendre ce genre d'incohérences sans hésiter, puisque contrairement à vos propos, corriger l'erreur d'un utilisateur ne signifie pas se lancer dans "une guerre d'édition", du moins c'est comme ça que j'envisage la chose.
En vous souhaitant un bon week-end.
Filip009 (2026-06-18 16:02:04+00:00): Je to natural=heath aj landuse=construction zároveň? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264010645
aceman444 (2026-06-18 20:31:14+00:00): Ano, este je to vacsinou zarastene. Neviem presne kde sa uz stavia, nie su fotky.
rskedgell (2026-03-21 12:51:03+00:00): Why have you deleted these tags? What is your source?

Also, please write a meaningful changeset comment - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
rskedgell (2026-03-21 12:49:20+00:00): Why have you deleted the address tags from these objects without explanation? What is your source for this?

Also, please write a meaningful changeset comment - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
iandees (2026-03-21 13:04:03+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11333081223 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180207325, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
rskedgell (2026-03-21 12:46:06+00:00): I've replaced the amenity=retail tag with building:use=retail as this is the documented tag for the current function of a building originally built as something else.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180206469
Bienson (2026-03-22 02:03:26+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180231981 - Keine Fußgängerzone
rempshaener (2026-03-21 16:46:39+00:00): Hallo,
so richtig konsequent ist es nicht, nur die Hausnummer auf "was:" zu setzen.  
Zumal die Adresse (inkl. Hausnummer) offiziell ohnehin am Grundstück hängen.
Viele Grüße
eggie (2026-03-21 11:32:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback De info samengevoegd met de bestaanxde adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Abelinoss (2026-03-21 11:50:03+00:00): Gezien. Dankjewel!
Kees 59 (2026-04-08 14:00:06+00:00): Something wrong with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13666627193 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13666627192? Looks like there is a tag inside the value of another tag
Manuel H (2026-04-08 15:02:40+00:00): Fixed. Thanks for the info.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2026-03-21 11:33:45+00:00): 另外一提，simple_revert 应该是没法用了不然我也不至于这么去用

https://imgur.com/a/5aeharp
SD Mapman (2026-03-23 02:54:16+00:00): Is there a way to edit the border_type map view overpass query from the QA checker (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1JzB) so that it shows where the wikidata links are and are not? I've been using lack of border_type to tell where I need to perform my manual cleanup and now I need something else to check...
whammo (2026-03-26 10:17:14+00:00): I'm not familiar enough with Overpass Turbo styling to be able to tweak that query for you. I could write a separate query for that if you want...
SD Mapman (2026-03-26 17:47:50+00:00): That would be great, thanks! What I'm trying to look for is boundaries without a wikidata tag.
Mammi71 (2026-04-07 10:38:04+00:00): Hallo mcliquid, ich habe mir noch nicht die Details angesehen, aber hier gibt es keinen Radweg mehr. An der Grabenstraße findet man seit 2 Monaten das korrekte Mapping. bisherige VZ 240(-30) wurden entfernt und die Markierungen weggefräst. 
PS: ich laufe und fahre da täglich lang.
Mammi71 (2026-04-07 10:42:45+00:00): PPS: hier eine zufällige Aufnahme von gestern, welche den Weg zwischen Grafenbergstr. 22 und 24 zeigt, im Vordergrund die Grabenstr., leicht links die neue Beschilderung und erkennbar die weggefräste Markierung, die den Gehweg segregated hatte.
Mammi71 (2026-04-07 10:46:25+00:00): vor einem jahr:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=758612590047922
aktuell:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1854523531923037
mcliquid (2026-04-07 13:30:05+00:00): Hallo Mammi, danke für die ausführliche Rückmeldung.

> PS: ich laufe und fahre da täglich lang.

Dann macht es tatsächlich Sinn, dass du dir das direkt anschaust und korrigierst.

Viele Grüße
mcliquid
Mammi71 (2026-04-09 08:18:47+00:00): Kannst Du mir bitte noch etwas Kontext geben, was Du da gemacht hast (außer veraltete Bilder zu verwenden). Sehe ich das richtig, dass du den Pfad neu eingefügt hast (obwohl keine bauliche Trennung zur Straße)?
mcliquid (2026-04-09 09:37:48+00:00): Mein Fehler mit den alten Bildern. Ich hab all meine Änderungen restlos revertiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181087429
Den Weg hatte ich rein aufgrund von Mapillary neu hinzugefügt, da er, wie in der Challenge beschrieben, nicht vorhanden war.
Sonnige Grüße
mcliquid
VictorIE (2026-05-06 05:26:03+00:00): Hi,

Somethings seems to have gone awry here: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=180203051

I am reasonable happy that the two larger buildings are incinerators (the chimneys are visible), but I don't know what the other buildings are. I suspect the southern one is related to the adjacent pumping station building.
jonnymccullagh (2026-05-11 21:31:54+00:00): As usual you are 100% correct & as usual I am 100% to blame. I must have somehow used Shift-R in JOSM but I can't think why/how. Thanks for catching.
bxl-forever (2026-03-22 23:09:18+00:00): ## REVERTED CHANGESET
OSM is not a game, please be kind and do not modify public transport relations.
This is the station building, it should not be inserted directly into route relations.
NeisBot (2026-03-21 11:48:22+00:00): Hi Vibha_Lakra, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 87% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 landuse(s)
- 1 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180203308
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-22 06:46:10+00:00): Hi Vibha_Lakra,

Could you please share the reason for removing and only partially remapping the natural=water reservoir in this changeset?

Thanks in advance!
frozenrabi (2026-05-18 09:15:48+00:00): After reviewing your waterway mapping, I realised that you not been able to identify waterway and woods or other features. The buildings, woods, trees all features are mapped as waterways. Please review it and update. Many thanks!
slovak_scouser (2026-03-21 11:55:37+00:00): landuse, parking spaces, entrances, details (i accidentally uploaded the changeset with no comment)
Fraxi (2026-03-21 13:59:15+00:00): Ама аз го добавих преди 2 дни, бе човек :) Не ти ли се показа в приложението?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13662058120
Освен да ги обединя? Помня, че пишеше "Пекарна за домашни любимци" и "Грууминг и спа".
Fraxi (2026-03-21 18:20:15+00:00): Обединих ги. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180220469
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2026-04-07 09:50:48+00:00): hello again, same issue as in other changeset, you ended up missalligning the data. misalignment on this chageset at https://ibb.co/F4W6yZPD .can i revert this changeset?
Djack-OSM (2026-04-08 13:05:49+00:00): Here too, the satellite image has incorrect positioning. My changes were made taking into account the corrected positioning of the satellite image, obtained based on real exploration of the area with a GPS navigator.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2026-04-08 13:12:43+00:00): hello, check my answer on the other changeset and check the official aerial imagery which doesn't have offset
mueschel (2026-03-26 10:51:05+00:00): Hi, 'state_SHPO_Refno1' is a strange tag. These reference numbers are usually tagged as "ref:XYZ".
We already have

ref:US-WV:shpo
ref:Washington_SHPO
ref:Oregon_SHPO

I'd say the first one is the better scheme, having a clear country & state code. I.e. I suggest to use here:

ref:US-FL:shpo
felipeeugenio (2026-03-21 14:14:52+00:00): Hola. Los loteos rurales se mapean de una manera un poco distinta, pero lo que llama la atención es que este ya estaba mapeado y el área que dibujó agrupa varios loteos. Además, esta es como la tercera vez en poco tiempo que algún mapero le cambia el nombre a todo.
Por último, borró un condominio de cuajo. Qué es lo que intentan hacer en la zona?

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180206411
felipeeugenio (2026-03-21 14:16:51+00:00): Hola. Los nombres de los puentes van en bridge:name. En el name= se mantiene el nombre de la calle.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180206411
felipeeugenio (2026-03-21 14:19:53+00:00): Otro tema. hace 20 dias usted mismo cambio el nombre "Camino a Valparaíso" a "Avenida José Luis Caro". Ahora lo cambia otra vez. Puede por favor explicar los cambios? gracias
Lenny Andreu (2026-03-21 16:35:49+00:00): engri, por favor, cuando haga cambios intente separar registros nuevos, de eliminados y de editados, así es más fácil evaluar y no perder cambios utiles
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180206411
martinst (2026-07-21 20:27:04+00:00): Du hast einen Node ohne Tags erstellt, der so nichts bringt.
Comino (2026-03-23 07:34:26+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
Glassman (2026-03-22 18:37:05+00:00): #TIP: Just leave the website address so people can easily get to the main page. Use tags for services offered.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180206762
felipeeugenio (2026-03-21 13:51:54+00:00): Hola. Bienvenido y gracias por las ediciones.
Si bien se entiende perfecto lo que intentaste hacer, lo que se hace es usar los nombres oficiales en OSM. Si una calle se llama Carrera, se llama Carrera, independiente de a cuál hermano Carrera se refiera la calle. Eso puede ser dejado como alt_name= quizás, pero no como nombre. Felizmente solo cambiaste 3 calles. Voy a investigar a ver si acaso el cambio corresponde. De loo contrario lo dejo como alt_name.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180207059
felipeeugenio (2026-03-21 13:56:01+00:00): Además, Zenteno Puede ser por el militar (José Ignacio).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180207059
osmmapper222 (2026-03-22 18:58:14+00:00): Hallo mwbf70,

das gesamte Gelände ist bereits unter dem Namen "Deponie Kolenfeld" kartiert (inkl. Aha als Betreiber): 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35590731

Befindet sich in dem Gebäude ein Büro o.Ä., da du genau dieses nach der Deponie benannt hast?
9_tab (2026-03-22 12:44:06+00:00): Intéressant: ça comble effectivement une lacune. Dommage que je n'ai eu l'occasion de l'examiner davantage.
eggie (2026-03-21 14:04:13+00:00): Dag Wouter,
review_requested 	yes

Lijkt me oke.   Soms het het wel handig om eerst disused:highway=track te mappen ipv te verwijderen omdat anders medemappers het weer gaan intekenen. disused gebruiken voorkomt opnieuw intekenen.
MVG
eggie
aTarom (2026-03-21 17:04:27+00:00): Hi, thanks for the improvements, what does the tag
"footway"="footway"
mean?
Cheers
mapmanMUC (2026-03-22 10:18:32+00:00): Hello,
This was a test. In Igueste de San Andrés, there are many footpaths connected by steps. The steps are also tagged as such. 
The reason for the test is that I’d like to order a model of Igueste from a provider who creates 3D models from OSM data. In the preview, the stairs are missing from the model. As a result, some of the footpaths appear to be floating in mid-air. The provider said that if the stairs are tagged as footpaths, they will appear in the model. But that doesn’t seem to be entirely the case. Do you know how I can additionally tag the stairs correctly as actual footpaths so that they are recognised as such? Can I assign the tag “Highway” twice for the stair sections? So Highway=steps and Highway=footpath?
Thanks and best regards
aTarom (2026-03-22 17:17:25+00:00): I don’t fully understand the issue, but testing should not be done on the live database. You need to use the dedicated testing instance at https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org
Axelos (2026-03-21 18:18:37+00:00): Bonsoir,

Je suis dubitatif quant à l’usage de bicycle_road=yes sur le chemin https://osm.org/way/1191896069.

Le wiki indique que ce type de route n’existe qu’en Allemagne : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:bicycle_road%3Dyes

Bien cordialement, Axel.
Bromind (2026-03-21 22:54:26+00:00): Bonsoir, 
ça doit être l'option que j'ai sélectionner dans streetcomplete, qui ne convient pas pour la France. Il s'agit d'une zone de rencontre. 
Cordialement,
Martin
Axelos (2026-03-22 18:52:23+00:00): Bonjour,

En effet, j’ai modifié en conséquence. Merci pour le retour.

https://osm.org/changeset/180267530

Axel.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2026-03-25 10:26:55+00:00): Cái này bạn chặn theo way_id được rồi nhé. Sau mở lại thì mở theo remove access=no đi. Ít người nhớ cái node lắm. Rất cám ơn bạn.
Đuro Jiří (2026-03-21 14:15:51+00:00): Attenzione,hai cancellato informazioni.
qstep (2026-03-21 20:42:03+00:00): Üdv az OpenStreetMap-en! Ezen a turistatérképen, ami nem tudom hol van kihelyezve, Hidegkút-forrásként jelölik: https://i.imgur.com/ITkXsYb.jpeg

A Nagyalmási-dűlőről Parád vonatkozásában semmilyen információt nem találtam, még régi térképeken sem. Parádóhuta felett találtam csak "Cserdűlő" nevűt. 

Tud erre valamilyen forrást adni?
KucseraAnett (2026-03-21 22:29:43+00:00): Jelenleg nem tudok forrást adni, csak azt tudom hogy minden parádi lakos nagyalmási forrásként ismeri. Béke forrásként valószínűleg azért lett feltüntetve mert a Béke és a Szabadság utca vége felől közelíthető meg. Fogok keresni papír alapú régi térképet amin szerepel.