piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
AndyB_66 (2025-12-22 14:22:44+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Dawid2849 (2026-01-01 18:33:30+00:00): Skąd informacja, że otwarto drugą jezdnię? Gdy otwierano ten fragment S1 to celowo otwarto drogę tylko w jednym kierunku, aby nie wpychać dużego ruchu na lokalne drogi. W mediach nie mogę znaleźć żadnej informacji, aby coś się zmieniło w tej kwestii
m_p_13 (2026-01-02 13:20:37+00:00): Informacja była na podstawie czyjejś uwagi.
Poprawione, sprawdź, czy dobrze.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-25 03:15:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13395051535
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/421565183

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-25 03:45:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13395051535
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/421565183

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
BCNorwich (2025-12-24 06:36:07+00:00): Hi, I've removed your new footpath section Way: 1460493266 as it duplicates an existing highway and could cause disruption to routing.

Regards Bernard.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-26 11:39:30+00:00): Hello!

You used
crossing:markings=zebrab
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4923676038/history

Have you maybe meant
crossing:markings=zebra
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
AntMadeira (2026-01-30 22:45:04+00:00): Thank you for pointing this out, Mateusz.
It was a typo when switching between layers.

I already corrected it.

Regards,
António.
bxl-forever (2025-12-25 19:54:14+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Even if we appreciate the effort to add buildings, could you please NEVER trace buildings from aerial pictures.

Aerial pictures show a distorted view of the reality, those images are ok for roads, grass and the like, but they are not suited for structures that are higher than the ground.

Please use "SPW(allonie) PICC numerical imagery" in the editor if you touch buildings.

I spend a lot of time today to repair most of the houses + more damage in other changes like this church (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/479683515) or this school (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/479683515).

I felt I had to warn you.  This is a frequent mistake by people in their early contributions.  Better take good habits early, because repairing faulty edits takes a lot of time.

Thanks in advance and happy mapping.
JeroenHoek (2025-12-22 14:01:45+00:00): Ik kan die telefoonnummers niet terugvinden op de bron die je noemt. Het zijn ook allemaal 088-nummers. Horen die wel bij de vestigingen? En zo ja, zijn ze wel openbaar?
JeroenHoek (2025-12-22 14:02:40+00:00): Ik zie het nummer wel staan bij Zwolle, maar Amsterdam noemt geen nummer.
lipuma (2025-12-23 08:18:25+00:00): Alle telefoonnummers zijn van de servicebalie van elke locatie. Deze zijn te vinden op de websites van de locaties. Maar ik zie dat er bij Amsterdam inderdaad geen nummer wordt genoemd. Daar is nu het algemene klantenservice telefoonnummer toegevoegd, dat is niet de bedoeling denk ik.
JeroenHoek (2025-12-23 08:32:40+00:00): Nee klopt. Algemene nummers horen daar niet thuis.
Kees 59 (2025-12-23 10:52:26+00:00): 088 zijn niet geografisch gebonden bedrijfsnummers zie https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedrijfsnummer
lipuma (2025-12-23 12:46:03+00:00): Dan gebruikt het Kadaster 088-nummers op een ongebruikelijke manier denk ik: https://www.kadaster.nl/over-ons/het-kadaster/contact/bezoekadressen

Hier staan alle bezoekadressen met hun telefoonnummers. Alleen het hoofdkantoor De Grift Apeldoorn heeft geen specifiek nummer maar gebruikt het algemene klantenservice telefoonnummer.
DerekvB (2025-12-24 10:44:11+00:00): Ik heb alle telefoonnummers inderdaad gevonden op https://www.kadaster.nl/over-ons/het-kadaster/contact/bezoekadressen
Het zijn de telefoonnummers van de receptie van die vestiging. 
Telefoonnummer van het hoofdkantoor De Grift in Apeldoorn ben ik niet aangekomen.
lipuma (2025-12-24 11:07:39+00:00): Super, dank je wel en mapse.
rempshaener (2025-12-22 19:45:35+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Der Hydrant weist korrekte Tags auf, nur mit der Position stimmt etwas nicht: Er liegt innerhalb des Gebäudeumrisses.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
tobkab (2025-12-22 20:18:55+00:00): Moin,

der ist unter einem Vordach.
rempshaener (2025-12-23 18:20:01+00:00): Hallo,
okay; wenn du Lust hast und es dir zutraust, könntest du dir das Schulgebäude vornehmen.
Die Gebäudeumrisse stellen in der Regel auf das ab, was den  Boden berührt ("Fußabdruck"). Daher werden Dächer gerne separat und als building=roof erfasst.
Viele Grüße
mcliquid (2026-01-01 09:35:21+00:00): Grad im Gegenteil, unclassified steht für Durchgangsverkehr: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=unclassified
Wenn nur Anlieger dort fahren dürfen, ist die Straße nicht für die Allgemeinheit befahrbar und damit keine unclassified :)
DressyPear4 (2025-12-22 14:34:14+00:00): Sempre remover a tag "construction" caso contrário apps não farão roteamento por essa via.
DressyPear4 (2025-12-22 14:39:45+00:00): O mesmo vale para tag access=no
schobbish (2025-12-23 21:33:49+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM! I'm marking this as Bad due to issues in addr:street, opening hours, and phone number. Please see the OSM wiki (https://osm.wiki) for details on how to properly format these tags. Additionally, do not use the description tag for advertising.

For other mappers, accounts "10 Day Smiles" and "Emeka Abazie" are very likely related.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176261871
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:52:08+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13395126503 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Dental implant and cosmetic dentistry practice in Arlington TX"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-27 15:59:28+00:00): ❌ Fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/176379352

Thanks, schobbish
AndyB_66 (2025-12-22 14:21:14+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
MarcieLLo-KR (2025-12-22 14:46:21+00:00): OK - zrozumiałem i będę tak robić w przyszłości.
AndyB_66 (2025-12-22 14:20:37+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
the_third_man (2025-12-22 15:25:28+00:00): According to the description, the defibrillator is in the office. Is the office really accessible to everyone in the building from 8 am to 11 pm? Or should access be set to private? The office could be locked and therefore inaccessible.
AndyB_66 (2025-12-22 14:19:31+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
itineris (2026-02-06 08:04:48+00:00): Hi,

In Hungary, always align your favourite imagery to the newest FÖMI orthophotos because they are properly georeferenced.

Moreover, we have an accurate official source for main roads so please think twice before pulling them to (unaligned) Esri. Or Bing.

Thank you,
Ákos
Udarian (2025-12-22 17:34:29+00:00): A few comments about this changeset:
 - Next time please leave a changeset comment that better describes what you did in the changeset, for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
 - this changeset also adds duplicate information as facebook=*, instagram=*, linkedin=* are already tagged through contact:facebook=* etc


Happy mapping,
Udar.
unen (2025-12-22 13:34:14+00:00): December 2025 :)
NeisBot (2025-12-22 13:41:22+00:00): Hi mchagascouto, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 82% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 amenity(s)
- 2 barrier(s)
- 2 boundary(s)
- 3 highway(s)
- 3 landuse(s)
- 4 name(s)
- 14 source(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176264077
mchagascouto (2025-12-22 14:09:38+00:00): My deletions were intentional
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-27 13:11:12+00:00): Thanks for your reply.
kingkingHK (2025-12-22 14:30:11+00:00): Why is it a `=trunk_link`?
kingkingHK (2025-12-23 02:52:16+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176289291

1. Vehicles from Kai Fuk Road westbound can not go to Shing Kai Road, so it should be kept as `=motorway_link`.
2. The extent of tunnel area is already conveyed with `motorroad=`.
A67-A67 (2026-01-23 11:20:55+00:00): In deze wijziging wordt een fietspad foutief veranderd in een weg in aanleg. Dit zal ik terugdraaien.

Toegang voor hulpdiensten kan worden aangegeven met de tag emergency=yes.
Enock4seth (2025-12-22 14:04:17+00:00): Oop!! I hit "Enter" instead of "Shift" 

Deleted non-existing roads, removed assumed maxspeed=30 from roads
Sébastien Pi (2026-01-28 21:52:44+00:00): Bonjour,

J’ai passé les barrières en bicycle=dismount, même si c’est peu utilisé par les routeurs (Geovelo le fait au moins). Je me demande s’il ne faudrait pas retirer les bicycle=designated sur les chemins. Ils sont mis en valeur bien que peu exploitable.

J’ai aussi retiré plus namite comme le chemin ci-dessous. Le nom ne sert pas à cela. Mais j’ai laissé cette information dans les descriptions.
MxxCon (2025-12-24 17:04:45+00:00): Hello.
My analogies since I'm not too familiar with connectivity relations, but it seems like you mapped the same feature twice in relations 19990172 and 19989919. Is that correct?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176265185
Gangadi Anusha (2026-01-02 10:12:10+00:00): yes it's correct .Thank you for the valuable feedback. Please feel free to point out similar suggestions in future as well. 
 Regards, 
Anusha
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-26 12:35:19+00:00): Hello!

You used
crossing:markings=zebraww
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053017499/history

Have you maybe meant
crossing:markings=zebra
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
ivanbranco (2026-01-26 12:56:37+00:00): Fixed with Mapillary.
AndyB_66 (2025-12-22 14:13:21+00:00): Nie używaj samych wielkich liter do opisu adresów, obiektów itp.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-25 03:45:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1264428485

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
AndyB_66 (2025-12-25 09:01:41+00:00): Ja tylko zmieniłem wielkie litery w adresie na małe - wprowadził go użytkownik "KAMAROKRP", któremu chyba zaciął się Caps Lock ;) (changeset 176264961), więc do nie go proszę zgłaszać uwagi.
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:52:11+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13395254493 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Computer repair and IT support service"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deiner Beschreibung lauten: "Computerreparatur- und IT-Supportdienst"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 17:52:28+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176713229
eggie (2025-12-22 15:03:27+00:00): warnings:almost_junction:highway-highway 	1
komt omdat je trottoir niet aan de rijbaan vastzat. Opgelost.
Tip Je zou ook nog kunnen kijken of die noexit=yes op die toegangsweg langs de brandweerkazerne nog klopt. Wellicht kun je nu met de fiets of te voet op de parkeerplaats komen?
De verbinding ontbreekt nu.
Maar je gaat nog kijken begrijp ik.
Mapse,
eggie
NielsH80 (2025-12-24 10:55:27+00:00): Ik heb het toegevoegd in wijzigingenset: 176353015
SomeoneElse (2025-12-22 14:44:18+00:00): Hello,
You've deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9520125/history here - was that deliberate?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2025-12-22 14:44:43+00:00): Hola,
Has borrado https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9520125/history. ¿Fue intencional?
Atentamente,
Andy
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-23 02:57:51+00:00): De-duplicated with POI node with nonsensical overlapping building way, and merged/cleaned up malformed and misleading tags, in changeset/184455886

https://osm.org/changeset/184455886
SomeoneElse (2025-12-25 18:30:29+00:00): Hello,
I wonder if you could help with some problems in the area of https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#23/52.34271/-1.70728 ?  In OSM that is https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=23/52.34271968/-1.70726271&layers=S , but none of the renderers on the OSM site show enough detail to fix it.
The first questions is: Is there a parallel footpath and road at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#21/52.34269/-1.70721 ?  I'm guessing, based on what part of the imagery is free of trees, that there isn't.  Back in 2019 there wasn't a parallel footpath: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2hOG ; it was added around 2022: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2hOH and 2023: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2hOJ .
My guess is that the parallel foopath will need to be deleted and everything joined up.
The second question is that I suspect that the public foootpath (red dots at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#24/52.34303/-1.70720/H/P ) does not stop just short of the road.  It's likely the on-the ground paths don't exactly match where the local authority think the public footpaths go (green on https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#24/52.34303/-1.70720/H/P ) but I suspect that it crosses the road.
The third is that I suspect that three paths don't join at the gate at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#25/52.34271/-1.70727/H and there isn't a path from the northeast that doesn't join but is instead attached to the fence, leaving a gap in the Heart of England Way (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/75260#map=23/52.34270870/-1.70727282&layers=S ).
By the way, this problem seems to have existed for a few years, long before your recent edits in the area.  It probably needs someone with local knowledge to answer (hence me asking you!) but you won't be able to fix it in Vespucci - the screen is just too small.
Best Regards,
Andy
literan (2025-12-22 19:39:09+00:00): боюсь это не тот сарай, который shed
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-22 19:43:24+00:00): service?
literan (2025-12-22 20:10:11+00:00): думаю, да. это Трольвей или еще ктото старинные названия расставлял
bartgron (2025-12-22 22:18:05+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176284500
Nie dodajemy fikcji do map. Pozdrawiam
VlIvYur (2025-12-25 10:49:23+00:00): Hello
What does it mean upside_down=yes?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13148733375
blu256 (2025-12-26 11:24:50+00:00): Hello VlIvYur,

When surveying the place I really found this recycle container to be upside down and thus (temporarily?) not really usable. I was conflicted as to whether I should add this piece of information but decided it wouldn't hurt since it's not likely to be supported by any OSM clients anyway.

I expect to be passing through that place soon, so I will be able to confirm whether the container is normal and usable again.

Nice to see someone monitoring OSM btw :-)
blu256 (2026-01-27 20:13:48+00:00): No longer relevant, the discussed container has been missing for some time
dcapillae (2025-12-22 15:18:23+00:00): Hola.

Por favor, no cambie la jerarquía viaria sin consultar antes la información disponible en el wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/M%C3%A1laga#Road_hierarchy.

Hace algún tiempo se hizo un esfuerzo por poner orden en este punto siguiendo información viaria oficial del municipio, y sería conveniente mantener el criterio para evitar que cada colaborador use el criterio propio a la hora de establecer el tipo de vial. De esta forma evitamos discusiones innecesarias.

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente, 

Daniel Capilla
zstadler (2026-03-03 12:14:30+00:00): שלום Barefoot Runner,

תודה על תרומתך ל OSM!

בעריכה זו הוספת אחוזה הרודיאנית והזזת לתוכה ארמון הרודיאני שכבר היה קיים.

האם יש מקום לכפילות שכזו?
ככל שאני רואה, תחומי האחוזה חופפים את תחום הארמון.

בברכה,
zstadler
Barefoot Runner (2026-03-03 18:21:38+00:00): ייתכן שיש משהו בדבריך
החשיבה מאחורי התוספת היא הוספה של פוליגון של כל המתחם. המתחם הוא אחוזה ובתוכה הארמון הוא חלק קטן.
לשיקולך.
zstadler (2026-03-04 13:50:46+00:00): המונח "אחוזה" משמש בד"כ לתיאור של מבנה ושל השטחים המקיפים אותו - גנים, מבני עזר, ובאירופה אפילו יערות.

התחום שמופה כאן חופף, להבנתי, לשחזור שנעשה  למבנה - ה"ארמון" כפי שנכתב בשילוט במקום.

הנטייה שלי היא להשאיר רק את המיפוי של השטח, ולאחד את התיוג של שני האלמנטים תחת השם "ארמון הרודיאני"

מה דעתך?
Barefoot Runner (2026-04-19 11:33:48+00:00): מסכים.
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:52:15+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13395279034 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Training centre for web development and IT courses in Nashik"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 17:52:28+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176713230
Rainero-repair (2026-03-31 21:24:23+00:00): Revert in changeset/180692572
wegen nicht zulässiger Quelle (Bayernatlas).
felipeeugenio (2025-12-22 14:52:53+00:00): #kaart 2025
felipeeugenio (2025-12-22 14:53:06+00:00): #kaart 2025
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2026-01-27 03:16:20+00:00): Please don't reclassify roads without discussion or label an entire road as a bridge.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176267978
BackroadRunner294 (2026-01-27 13:32:10+00:00): The reclassification of the highways is merely to align with the existing classifications by North Carolina DOT. As for “an entire road as a bridge,” where did that occur? I don’t recall doing that, and cannot find it it the changeset.
Wilcooo (2025-12-22 15:07:27+00:00): First time using building:part, have I done this correctly? The little part is overhanging the service road/area below.
eggie (2025-12-22 20:45:13+00:00): Hoi.. Ik zie helemaal geen gebouw meer.
Die building:part=...   kun je apart op de building=.. intekenen.
Nu zie je geen gebouw. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-22 20:57:00+00:00): Het gebouw heb ik hersteld..  Zo staat het bij de BAG bekend. De onderdoorgang heb ik getagd met covered=yes
layer=1 is niet nodig.
Een buildin:part ook niet. Dar rendert niet op een kaart. Dat wordt gebruikt om de verschillende structuren (verdiepingen) apart in te tekenen op het bestaande gebouw. 

MVG
eggie
Filip009 (2026-04-06 09:34:36+00:00): Hello, are you sure, this road is under construction?
YellowSoul (2026-04-06 12:38:59+00:00): Hi, you have to ask the author of the previous changeset. I just made the tags consistent.
Filip009 (2026-04-06 12:41:18+00:00): Okay, thank you. From what I know, this road is still proposed, so I will change it back to proposed.
Grass-snake (2026-03-18 19:04:58+00:00): Здравствуйте, тегом highway=living_street обозначаются улицы, обозначенные знаками 5.21 и 5.22 "Жилая зона.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway=living_street
Если знака нет, то лучше отметить другим тегом. По моим данным (немного устаревшем) здесь знака нет. Я бы хотел вернуть как было, highway=service, если знак не появился в последнее время.
mueschel (2025-12-22 16:00:34+00:00): Hi,
you added several tags here that shouldn't be in OSM, e.g. 
"source:maxspeed:named_numbered" or 
"source:maxspeed:app"

Could you check and fix this?
yelisey90 (2025-12-22 18:54:31+00:00): rv wrt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13279188501 - it can be clearly seen in aerial imagery, if you use https://nt0.napr.gov.ge/NGCache?x={x}&y={y}&z={z}&l=ORTHO_GEORGIA_4

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176277845
silversurfer83 (2025-12-22 20:07:55+00:00): Hi there :)

the Hermes "post office": Is that located in the tea shop or the clothing shop?

I ask because I believe there are no hermes operated places out there. Operator is nearly always some gas station oder shop and thus it should be tagged to the shop using 

post_office=post_partner

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176269589
joe248 (2026-01-06 17:22:39+00:00): Thanks. It's in the shop. It's correct now.
silversurfer83 (2026-01-06 17:25:21+00:00): Hey :)

thanks 

happy mapping
Tomas Straupis (2025-12-22 16:53:14+00:00): Labas. Žinok nereikia lauko/miško mikrokeliukų (track) išskyrinėti. Taipogi nereikia pagal ortofoto darymo spalvą segmentuoti realiai tos pačios žemėnaudos (nes beveik niekur tai nėra skirtinga žemėnauda, tik skirtingas būvis ortofoto fotografavimo metu). Nes na labai daug reikia paskui tvarkyti :-(
mindedie (2025-12-22 17:46:20+00:00): Supratau, nebežemėsiu.
Viskas taip pat galioja vienkiemiams/sodyboms, miškų kvartalams, miškeliams, krūmynams, baloms/šlapioms pievoms ir t.t. Šiandien yra, kitais metais (galbūt) nebus.
Tomas Straupis (2025-12-22 18:06:01+00:00): Taip, viskam galioja. Mažiems keliukams, kur reikia simbolizacijai, arba braižant, arba skaičiuojant dedamas automatinis buferis, pačių geometrijų dalinti/skaidyti nereikia. Laukas ar ortofoto metais dirbtas (todėl panašus į farmland), ar paliktas pabūti (todėl panašus į meadow) irgi mažas skirtumas, jų, kaip ir kokių biržių, mes iš principo negalime sužymėti.
eggie (2025-12-22 21:01:38+00:00): Een waterwell is een put. 
Niet alles rendert op de kaart. Dat is een keuze van de kaartenmaker.
De wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dwater_well
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-22 21:02:44+00:00): In deze layer rendert het bv wel. Dus niet te veel kijken naar alleen de standaardkaart
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176269781#map=19/53.327093/5.998573&layers=H
aixbrick (2025-12-22 17:17:02+00:00): Hallo,
bitte nicht die Bürgersteige als separate Wege mappen. Das sorgt nur für Routingprobleme und erzeugt unnötig Umwege. Es gibt keine bauliche Trennung, man kann jederzeit die Fahrbahn überqueren.
Gruß
aixbrick (2025-12-22 17:35:52+00:00): Auf das Problem hat dich auch @flohoff schon mal korrekterweise hingewiesen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172982675.