piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Giovanni Monni (2025-05-23 15:10:34+00:00): Ciao Enea. Ti ringrazio delle tue osservazioni. Mi spiego meglio sul significato di "VIA" nella nostra lingua Sarda: Arrúga; Arruga; Rua; Bia; Caminu; Carreba. Esempio di contrada nel XVI al XIX secolo: "Sa Ruga de Is Piras" ... Cinus ,... Mallorus e .... Malloras; Bia Is Lobinas ecc. ecc. erano e sono i cognomi degli abitanti che vivevano in queste contrade, ora Vie. Invece le Croci In Italiano le croci Sante, sono chiamate in Sardo da noi nella lingua Campidanese Gruxi Santa. e ancora sempre in Sardo Grúche , nf: cruche*, gruge, grughe, grugi, gruxe, ruche. N.B. Vorrei rivalutare queste antiche Vie e contrade. Ti ringrazio, se riesci a trovare il tag corretto, ma lasciando invariato il toponimo Antico. Grazie. Buona serata.
EneaSuper (2025-05-24 08:18:43+00:00): Ciao ancora, grazie mille delle delucidazioni.

Naturalmente non sono qui per delle osservazioni linguistiche bensì per quelle di carattere tecnico, cioè il tagging, che andrebbe migliorato e reso più corretto. Di conseguenza non cancellerò niente, tranquillo, anzi, più roba è mappata meglio è!

Da quello che ho avuto modo di vedere hai mappato davvero molto (anche a livello urbano, che è la cosa in cui sono maggiormente ferrato; ma soprattutto a livello extraurbano), ergo da solo potrei avere delle difficoltà e delle carenze a revisionare il tutto.

È un problema se chiedo delucidazioni ai miei colleghi anche sul forum della community per decidere il da farsi? Naturalmente puoi partecipare anche tu alle discussioni sia lì che sul gruppo Telegram.

Fammi sapere 🙂
Giovanni Monni (2025-05-24 10:52:05+00:00): Ciao Enea. Si certo, l'importante che si  riesca a fare il lavoro a regola d'arte. Ho modificare e creato al posto dei tag che mi hai segnalato come sbagliati. Tag: Particelle Catastali, inserendo foglio e particella Strade estrapolate dalle mie mappe d'impianto catastali  Comunali. Quando puoi dimmi cosa ne pensi o se riesci a trovare miglior soluzione. 
Grazie. Buona giornata.
EneaSuper (2025-05-24 11:16:37+00:00): Eccomi, ho aperto la discussione sul forum, spero vada bene!

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mappare-in-maniera-corretta-borgate-e-particelle-catastali/130503
map per (2025-05-25 19:17:01+00:00): Because of review_requested:
The edit looks good, thank you!
map per (2025-05-25 19:17:20+00:00): Because of review_requested:
The edit looks good, thank you!
Taksine (2025-05-24 01:16:55+00:00): 你好，openstreetmap并非一个可以任意胡乱绘制地图的网站，你应当注意到清华园已经出现在地图上了，它不是旅游景点，请勿胡乱添加。
JezCrow (2025-05-23 22:56:26+00:00): Hi Dan, just wondering which map are you copying from and do you have permission to use it? If you're simply using the Ordnance Survey 2025 basemap, then that's in copyright so not allowed. There are out-of-copyright alternatives on the National Library of Scotland website which are a suitable alternative.
Happy mapping,
Jez
Dan Hatton (2025-05-24 08:25:38+00:00): Thanks, Jez.  The process for this feature was as follows:

- I know there's a ditch called "drain number 3" in the area, and its approximate course, from the map accompanying the inclosure award for Sawston (1809, so definitely out of copyright).
- I confirm that the ditch still exists, and still follows the same approximate course, from the map on the CCC website (I think that probably is OS basemap data, although I can't be sure because I don't have access to the unadulterated OS basemap.)
- I mark the exact course by drawing a line following the linear feature that's visible in the satellite imagery provided on iD.

What do you think?  Is that an acceptable procedure?
Dan Hatton (2025-05-24 08:30:35+00:00): Oh yes, and at the end, for this specific changeset: I discover that the ditch/track crossing is a bridge rather than a culvert - the probable OS basemap data is my sole source for that.
SomeoneElse (2025-05-23 12:11:18+00:00): In here I've changed the Dales High Way route up Shipley Glen - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7152429#map=16/53.85060/-1.80649 .   The previous route may once have existed, but peters out north of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1388968997 which is a bit of a scramble back up.
eggie (2025-05-23 10:38:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback:  Lijkt me oke. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
evgenykatyshev (2025-05-26 06:01:23+00:00): I reverted this changeset because the new class of the road doesn't match criteria. This is just a road leads to small neigborhood, there isn't any significant traffic I think

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166760421
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-23 10:10:47+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190266096

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
YomanNH (2025-05-23 10:40:47+00:00): Po pierwsze, dlaczego dla całego budynku https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190266096 ustawiłeś addr:housenumber=9C, skoro 9C to połowa tego domu, a druga połowa to 9B (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11603059691)? Był prawidłowy węzeł z adresem 9B (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11603059690) i nie wiadomo dlaczego go usunąłeś.

Po drugie, czemu tworzysz niekompletne adresy, o czym świadczy pierwszy komentarz pod tym zestawem zmian?

Po trzecie, czemu nie poprawiasz błędnych adresów, które wcześniej stworzyłeś? Te błędy były wielokrotnie wskazywane pod twoimi zestawami zmian, ale ignorujesz te przydatne komentarze, a co gorsze, dalej tworzysz błędne adresy?

Ale zapewne i tak zignorujesz mój komentarz i nadal będziesz kontynuował niszczenie mapy.
YomanNH (2025-05-23 10:42:21+00:00): Mała poprawka - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11603059690 to był oczywiście adres 9C (a nie 9B), który usunąłeś i przeniosłeś błędnie na cały budynek.
Barroszt (2025-08-04 17:07:59+00:00): zostało to naprawione, dziękuje za zwrócenie uwagi
Barroszt (2025-08-04 17:09:25+00:00): ja nie niszczę mapy, tylko ją dopieszczam szczegółami, czasami przesadzam, ale już bardziej nad tym panuję jak tutaj https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164643113#map=16/52.98778/18.59777&layers=N
Ritam Saha (2026-01-03 13:31:35+00:00): You may have added the address incorrectly. You have added `addr:housenumber=24 Rajkrisna Ghosal Road`, here it seems like 24 should be the house number and Rajkrishna Ghosal Road the street. In that case the correct tagging should be
...
addr:housenumber=24
addr:street=Rajkrishna Ghosal Road
...
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-23 23:13:14+00:00): Reverted
ciclista (2025-05-23 10:49:44+00:00): ...wrong comment, should be: added and update POIs
source: survey
chris66 (2025-05-27 12:58:07+00:00): Hi, bei Deinen Bearbeitungen sind hier leider eine ganze Reihe von Relationen kaputt gegangen.

Müsste wohl revertiert werden.
Nakaner-repair (2025-05-27 13:01:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166825877 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by jswalker: Deletions without proper explanation and lots of additional data damaged (broken polygons etc.)
chris66 (2025-05-27 12:57:17+00:00): Hi, bei Deinen Bearbeitungen sind hier leider eine ganze Reihe von Relationen kaputt gegangen.

Müsste wohl revertiert werden.
Nakaner-repair (2025-05-27 13:01:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166825877 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by jswalker: Deletions without proper explanation and lots of additional data damaged (broken polygons etc.)
chris66 (2025-05-27 12:57:48+00:00): Hi, bei Deinen Bearbeitungen sind hier leider eine ganze Reihe von Relationen kaputt gegangen.

Müsste wohl revertiert werden.
Nakaner-repair (2025-05-27 13:01:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166825877 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by jswalker: Deletions without proper explanation and lots of additional data damaged (broken polygons etc.)
NeisBot (2025-05-23 11:03:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
Palladiano (2025-05-23 14:11:00+00:00): Sure, just done.  Please have a look, it should be fine now.
Kind regards,
Manuel
NeisReview (2025-05-23 14:17:15+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element.
chris66 (2025-05-27 12:59:27+00:00): Siehe auch:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kandidat-fur-revert-loschung-von-waldwegen-ohne-rucksicht-auf-mitgliedschaften-in-relationen/130631
Santi2222 (2025-08-22 12:50:41+00:00): Hola: cuando el carril bus pertenece a otras vías (es decir, no está segregado físicamente), lo correcto es mapearlo mediante etiquetas en la vía principal (tal y como estaba hasta ahora). He cambiado el mapeado al estado anterior. Un saludo
NeisReview (2025-05-24 10:00:43+00:00): #DeletionsCheck

Hi, welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that many changes in this set involve deletions.

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.
Nakaner-repair (2025-05-27 13:01:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166825877 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by jswalker: Deletions without proper explanation and lots of additional data damaged (broken polygons etc.)
FraukeLeo (2025-05-27 13:06:04+00:00): Hallo jswalker, dazu zwei Hinweise:
1. Bitte ohne etwas tiefere Kenntnis der OSM-Datenmodelle nicht einfach Wege löschen. Hier hast du mit deinen Löschungen auch weitere Datenstrukturen zerstört, z.B. auch das Objekt, das die Waldfläche darstellt, deshalb ist er jetzt nicht mehr "grün". 
2. Nutzungsverbote werden durch Tags an den Objekten abgebildet. Ein real vorhandener Weg sollte auch in OSM als Datenobjekt vorhanden sein, sonst besteht das Risiko, dass der nächste vorbeikommende Mapper den scheinbar noch nicht erfassten Weg abläuft, und nichts ist gewonnen. 
Kurzform: Die Information "Hier ist ein Weg, der aber nicht benutzt werden darf" ist eine wertvollere Information als "Hier ist nix", wo real was ist.
Deine Maßnahme wird derzeit in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kandidat-fur-revert-loschung-von-waldwegen-ohne-rucksicht-auf-mitgliedschaften-in-relationen/130631 diskutiert, wo du dich gern beteiligen darfst. Wir beißen nicht :)
BCNorwich (2025-05-23 13:28:16+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I doubt the formal name of this service road is 'k', thus I've removed it.

Regards Bernard.
chris66 (2025-05-27 12:58:42+00:00): Hi, bei Deinen Bearbeitungen sind hier leider eine ganze Reihe von Relationen kaputt gegangen.

Müsste wohl revertiert werden.
Nakaner-repair (2025-05-27 13:01:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166825877 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by jswalker: Deletions without proper explanation and lots of additional data damaged (broken polygons etc.)
YomanNH (2026-01-15 08:32:40+00:00): Hej, co to jest "Bezużyteczny slip"? To chyba nie jest nazwa?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1125365837/history
MOHAMMED07 (2025-06-17 11:56:31+00:00): Dear, please correct the administrative boundaries of this center. This site belongs to a governorate Harub and was placed within the borders of another governorate. These borders are incorrect and accurate. Many observations have been put in place to solve this problem. No modification of the observations and no solution has been made. This thing causes a lot of problems in the appearance of the site of this government center from one governorate to another governorate. This note will be sent to more than one site belonging to this center of the governorate. Please correct the administrative boundaries of the governorate Harub and Best regards
GeoKitten (2025-05-23 11:26:33+00:00): And if I did break anything, please explain what I did wrong so I can get it right next time.
jleedev (2025-05-25 21:26:54+00:00): Well, the `sign` node being _on_ the highway way feels a little silly, but it looks correct :)
grzegorz75jan (2025-05-23 13:42:06+00:00): Danke.
Samuele Battarra (2025-06-04 13:36:25+00:00): L'indirizzo era già correttamente mappato sul nodo di ingresso, inoltre si chiama "Viale" Torino.
NeisBot (2025-05-23 11:59:07+00:00): Hi hilderonny2020, and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: Added tree species information to a node, identifying it as a Salix babylonica (Weeping Willow).
PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #AIgenerated #EmptyComment
gotitim (2025-05-23 14:43:26+00:00): Cześć, ulice, które nie są jeszcze w budowie oznaczamy jako highway=proposed, szczególnie jak nie jest to dokładny wygląd tylko przybliżony.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-23 17:33:14+00:00): a jak nawet zaprojektowana nie jest to i highway=proposed jest wątpliwe
Comino (2025-05-23 12:35:52+00:00): Hi, Can you please explain how you "fix address" by removing it?
Please leave the address as these are used in apps like BTCmap.
Snusmumriken (2025-05-23 13:05:13+00:00): In Stockholm we have unique addresses that are placed on the same node as the entrance. The address can then be associated to a POI with a relation, as in the case with Falafelbaren
Comino (2025-05-23 13:27:08+00:00): Oke. Beautiful but why do you delete the address? Your unique addresses system can co-exist side by side with having an address, which as mentioned before, is used by others. That’s why it is called OPENStreetMap.
Snusmumriken (2025-05-23 15:10:13+00:00): The definition of uniqueness is that something exists only once, there are no other instances. In this context that there is only one object with the address Hornsgatan 39B, Stockholm, Sweden.
Comino (2025-05-23 15:52:55+00:00): Then please explain why an address can be added. Having all the fields related to the address greyed out would make sense and also communicate this more clearly to other taggers.
NeisBot (2025-05-23 12:00:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-05-27 17:06:22+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166759521
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-26 07:42:52+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173782023
eggie (2025-05-23 14:21:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Beter geen adresgegevens aan de gebouwomtrek toekennen. er zijn al adresnodes. Ik heb het aangepast
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-05-23 14:25:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Alleen een naam zal niets doen in OSM. Ook de aard van het bedrijf toevoegen office=company?
Waarom 2x dezelfde naam?
source=BAG heb ik teruggezet. 


MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-05-23 14:34:40+00:00): Officetag en website toegevoegd.
MVG
joost schouppe (2025-10-13 08:45:20+00:00): This is the only railway=station in Belgium with tram=yes without station subtag. All the other metro-adjacent systems use station=subway for this kind of stop. On this line, I guess maybe it's a bit unique because it is overground but entirely separate from the road network. The other stops on this line have just the public_transport=station tag.
What would you suggest is the best tag for the stops on this line?
multimob (2025-10-13 11:18:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166407434 did it. This is a mistake. No railway=station tag wanted on aerial stations like here. Now removed.
joost schouppe (2025-10-13 14:49:48+00:00): On the [chat](https://matrix.to/#/!SqvNXrBsvdGHYRyota:matrix.org/$17603452323692MDzkh:matrix.org?via=matrix.org&via=kde.org&via=matrix.domainepublic.net), people tended towards not treating this line differently than other pre-metro systems. I know this has been discussed before. Maybe we can discuss this on the forum for easier archiving, and perhaps update https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Railways with current practices?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-23 12:41:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1389000713

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fryszker (2025-05-23 19:20:14+00:00): Thanks for the check and resource. I've checked the page and updated it, so should be correct now.
totera (2025-05-23 14:04:22+00:00): Una chiesa che si chiama "Casa"? Sei sicuro di questa modifica?
notmyproblem1 (2025-05-23 16:42:23+00:00): Beh, in sicilia ed altri parti ho visto tante altri luoghi chiamati.. "Casa ..."
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-23 12:51:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/893407658

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Norbert Dichter (2025-05-23 13:01:14+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166654756
user_22836626 (2025-05-29 16:15:06+00:00): Hallo VRR-OSM,

an dem von dir markierten Standort sind keine Fahrradständer vorhanden.

Es ist richtig, dass dort Fahrräder "einfach so" abgestellt werden, ja, an einem Treppengeländer. Fahrradständer gibt es dort jedoch nicht.

LG
Lukas
VRR-OSM (2025-05-30 05:30:08+00:00): Hallo Lukas,

danke für die Richtigstellung!
Ich habe den Punkt neben das Wartehäuschen gelegt. Dort sollten die Vorderradklemmen (noch) sein, korrekt?

Viele Grüße
Dominik
user_22836626 (2025-05-31 10:55:26+00:00): Hallo Dominik,

super, danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung.

Ja, das ist meines Wissens nach korrekt.
LG
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-14 04:46:18+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167598733
MassCartog (2025-05-23 14:34:41+00:00): Hello again, You again seem to be removing tracks that are visible in recent aerial imagery. You have ignored all comments from people who are asking why you are removing these. Could you please respond with the source and reason for removing these trails?  Also please put that information in the Changeset description "land management experience" is not a valid reason to remove data.
RupertJames (2025-05-23 14:44:14+00:00): Greetings, sorry for not responding to several of the requests. I've been busy in meetings. I've been removing a few routes that are not legal to use with motorized vehicles. It's a need as vehicle use continues on these features. Regardless of their presence on aerial imagery. Thanks for your concern. It is known that once a feature appears on maps, it is a feature that motorized users target.
rskedgell (2025-05-24 05:42:29+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding your business.

Do you occupy the whole building on the corner of Tooting High Street and Garratt Lane, or the ground floor unit between Halifax and JJ Moon's (I think this may have been Rozu Restaurant previously, based on FHRS data)?
AndThen (2025-05-29 18:28:06+00:00): Hi rskedgell,
That's correct! Rozu was part of the previous ownership (The Corin).
whb (2025-05-24 20:28:04+00:00): Änderungssatz rückgängig gemacht.
Die Kita befindet sich nicht in der Garage.
arcanma (2025-05-23 16:36:48+00:00): Angelo,
non ha senso aggiungere un evento di qualche giorno in OpenStreetMap, già non saprei come potrebbe essere etichettato un evento, mettere solo il nome  non significa nulla, quel dato non è di nessuna utilità. Si possono  inserire mercati, esposizioni e cose simili ma che abbiano almeno qualche mese di durata, avendo cura di toglierle quando terminano.
eggie (2025-05-23 14:27:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
whb (2025-05-24 20:25:54+00:00): Änderungssatz zurück gesetzt.
Entspricht nicht der Realität. Der Neubau existiert.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-24 23:45:18+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18282
whb (2025-05-24 20:20:15+00:00): Auch hier wird das Gebäude hoffentlich noch stehen.
Wieder hinzugefügt.
silversurfer83 (2025-05-24 20:51:27+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

danke, dass du hilfst die Datenbank aktuell zu halten.

Eine Frage: Warum ist dieser (sehr) kurze Abschnitt des Töpferstieg ausschließlich für LKW frei? Wie Ist denn hier die genaue Beschilderung nach StVO?

Und eine Bitte: Lies mal folgenden Artikel in unserem Wiki und arbeite mal an deinen Kommentaren, danke:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166657499