piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SteMue (2025-06-30 14:44:06+00:00): Welchen Sinn soll dieser Weg ergeben?
Es ist kein Radweg, ein gefährlicher schmaler, buckeliger Pfad zwischen Fahrbahn, Parkstreifen und Gehweg.
Bitte erklären.
Wetterquarz (2025-07-01 18:42:41+00:00): Sehr geehrte*r SteMue,
bezüglich der Klassifizierung als Radweg gibt es zu sagen, dass dieser nicht nutzungspflichtig ist und somit vielleicht nicht der perfekte Tag ist, aber Sie scheinen dies eh bereits geändert zu haben. Allerdings wäre es meine Auffassung, dass eine Fahrradfahrer*in durchaus berechtigt ist auf diesem Teil der Bürgersteiges zu fahren. Zum Thema Breite habe ich, da der markierte Weg in Teilen schmal ist, diese mit eingetragen. Was die Oberflächenqualität angeht, werden Sie wohl hauptsächlich den Wald meinen, da der Rest entsprechend eines gepflasterten Weges ist.
Zum Thema "gefährlich" ist es schwierig etwas zu sagen. Zwischen Heidenheimer Straße und Martin-Luther-Straße besteht durch die parkenden Autos und eine Engstelle an der Bushaltestelle ein Risiko, doch für den Rest des Weges sehe ich die Gefahr für Fahrradfahrende nicht.
Der allgemeinen Frage des Sinnes kann ich nur mit dem Grundsatz erwidern, dass OSM die Realität bestmöglich widerspiegeln soll und dies ist besser erreicht wenn dort etwas eingetragen ist - in welcher Art auch immer, auch wenn es nicht notwendigerweise Radweg heißt.
Wetterquarz (2025-07-01 18:54:46+00:00): Sehr geehrte*r SteMue,
ich habe soeben bezüglich gefahren auf Radwegen noch einen berlinbezogenen Artikel der OSM-Community gefunden, der vielleicht für Sie von Interesse sein könnte: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verkehrswende-Meetup/Radwege#Gefahrenstellen
Viele Grüße
Wetterquarz
SteMue (2025-07-04 17:08:11+00:00): Hallo,
ein ehemaliger Radweg ohne VZ 237, 240, 241) ist ein Gehweg und darf gemäß § 2 Abs. 4 StVO mit dem Fahrrad nicht befahren werden.
LG
Wetterquarz (2025-07-07 17:56:57+00:00): Sehr geehrte*r SteMue,
ich habe mir die Stelle mal angeschaut, die Sie hier ansprechen, und in §2 Abs. 4 Satz 3 steht: "Rechte Radwege ohne die Zeichen 237, 240 oder 241 dürfen benutzt werden." Es kann also nicht sein, dass es sich ohne Zeichen 237, 240 oder 241 automatisch um einen Gehweg handelt, da dieser, wie Sie schon analysiert haben nach Abs. 5 nicht mit dem Fahrrad befahren werden dürfte.
Ich würde also vermuten, dass Sie entweder etwas falsch verstanden haben oder dies noch nicht die ausschlaggebende Rechtsvorschrift ist.
Viele Grüße
Wetterquarz
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-12 17:13:23+00:00): have you intentionally marked https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1364396117/history with footway=sidewalk ?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway=sidewalk
HoubkneghteS (2025-09-01 04:36:39+00:00): Can you explain what the point of these names are?
b-jazz (2025-04-04 15:59:05+00:00): I really wish JOSM would prevent you from doing changeset areas without forcing you to confirm it first. It notifies you, but that isn't enough if you're in a groove.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2025-05-01 15:16:56+00:00): هل يوجد بئر فعلياً هنا ؟
Mohd Al-nabit (2025-06-08 17:28:42+00:00): السلام عليكم ، نعم يوجد بير ماء قديم باسم بير النابت ومعروفة عند اهل المكان ولكنها مهجورة
Mohd Al-nabit (2025-06-08 17:30:00+00:00): رحت لها واخذت احداثياتها وارسلتها لكم لاعتمادها مع جزيل الشكر
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2025-06-11 10:57:42+00:00): هل يمكنك من فضلك كتابة هذه الاحداثيات بعد التأكد منها بالضبط في مكانها الصحيح
flapnuta (2025-10-18 02:45:49+00:00): Hola Pedro, por que agregar Adicora como ciudad?
pantufla (2025-12-04 06:38:46+00:00): Hola, por favor podrías corredir Adícora?
MarcoR (2025-04-06 07:33:33+00:00): Ho annullato questo changeset insieme ad un altro perché avevano spostato un beacon ILS su una pista di atterraggio e poi rimosso i tag (probabilmente si tratta soltanto di un errore di un utente alle prime armi)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164577251
GA_Kevin (2025-04-04 16:44:22+00:00): Hi there! Instead of `name= Bloomingrose Post Office`, I’d consider `branch= Bloomingrose` but only if it is said on a sign. Otherwise the operator / brand tags and addr can portray this info.
GA_Kevin (2025-04-04 16:49:01+00:00): Ignore the above. I reread the wiki on post offices. You are right.
martinst (2025-04-04 19:41:45+00:00): Node 12551355079 und 12551344755: name= * ist nur für Eigennamen gedacht.
waste=trash wäre besser, siehe OSM Wiki.
Evros1969 (2025-04-05 04:14:35+00:00): In Ordnung
Yog Sot (2025-04-04 20:32:22+00:00): nie zgaduj tagów i ustawiaj to co faktycznie jest, a nie to co zgadujesz, jak już dodajesz, pls
Manuel H (2025-04-14 06:14:29+00:00): Hi, hier ist ein einsamer Punkt ohne Eigenschaften. Soll das der "Mittlerer Radauberg" sein?

MFG, Manuel
Ogmios (2025-04-14 07:04:43+00:00): Hm... scheinbar ein Unfall. Deleted. Danke
Andrea Musuruane (2025-04-05 11:14:09+00:00): Fixing this issue using addr:country=IT is clearly wrong. The correct fix is to use country=IT.
Raretrack (2025-04-05 15:49:04+00:00): Thank you for your feedback. Yes, I should have omitted the "addr:" from the key when I corrected the original error.
Jordi MF (2025-04-04 18:43:32+00:00): Hola de nuevo,

Con tu permiso, editaré estas vías para que tengan las dos informaciones que te comentaba: una etiqueta que informa sobre la antigua vía ferroviaria y otra etiqueta que informa que actualmente se trata de una pista de tierra que se puede transitar.

Dale una ojeada cuando puedas para que lo entiendas ;)
jmapb (2025-04-04 23:28:29+00:00): Hi ccoliva, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset 164530482 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group.
NeisReview (2025-04-05 05:29:42+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM.

Ich bin mir nicht sicher, aber ist es eine gute Idee einen Wanderweg von highway=path auf footway zu ändern? Laut Wiki ist dieser Value doch eher für "offizielle" Fusswege vorgesehen, oder verwechsle ich gerade etwas ...

Danke & Viele Grüße
chris66 (2025-09-12 19:05:39+00:00): Baustelle noch nicht fertig?
Sammyhawkrad (2025-04-05 09:59:48+00:00): Hi Rudolph, you re-aligned and moved some objects to match the Bing Maps Aerial as you can see, but you should know that there is a significant offset [1] between the imagery and data in Accra.

Secondly, your changeset comment does not tell us what you actually did. Learn about making good changeset comments here [2].

The changes you made also introduce a lot of errors so it, unfortunately, had to be reversed [3].

1. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_aerial_imagery#Matching_imagery_using_different_editors
2. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
3. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164543003
jmapb (2025-04-04 23:28:39+00:00): Hi ccoliva, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset 164530482 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group.
dadavid (2025-05-06 00:03:59+00:00): Siehe CS Kommentar hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164521453
NeisReview (2025-04-05 05:32:43+00:00): Hello Rudolph11, welcome to OSM!

Based on your changeset comment, could you clarify what you mapped here and in your latest changesets?

I've noticed mostly (only?) deletions.

Thanks!
dadavid (2025-05-06 00:02:44+00:00): Hi, 

die Panzersperren sind mEn keine Militärcheckpoints, siehe auch das Wiki [1]. 

Passt der tag barrier=tank_trap mit tank_trap=dragons_teeth hier nicht viel besser?

Viele Grüße und weiterhin happy mapping :) 

David



[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:military=checkpoint?uselang=de
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier%3Dtank_trap
[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tank_trap
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-27 16:37:23+00:00): wycofuję edycje z podejrzanego konta, patrz brak odpowiedzi w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Map_Rivers/blocks

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166835264
Enock4seth (2026-03-12 08:00:02+00:00): Hi Calvin, there is another way with similar name https://openstreetmap.org/way/322104763 

Can you check and confirm which is which?
Calvin Menttor (2026-03-12 08:34:03+00:00): hi enoch

road name edited
Enock4seth (2026-03-22 07:20:47+00:00): Hi Calvin,
You unfortunately did not understand me. Changing the name from "Coco Beach Road" to "Coco Beach St" does not resolve the problem. How can two separate ways not connected physically and ~400m apart have the same name? https://openstreetmap.org/way/322104763 already had the name "Coco Beach Road" since version 4 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322104763/history/4 

Your contribution here looks mapping from the field, if so can you confirm the name on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322104766 is as on the street sign? If yes, that implies the name from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322104763/history/4  is false and should be removed.

PS: Please use the full form instead of abbreviations from the street signs. eg. "Street" instead of "St.", "Avenue" instead of "Ave.", "Road" instead of "Rd.", etc
NeisReview (2025-04-05 05:37:43+00:00): #NodeDragging

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for contributing to the map. I’ve reviewed your recent edits and noticed that at least one node of a way was moved. This can sometimes happen unintentionally, and it’s led to some unusual intersections or overlaps between street segments and other map elements.

Could you kindly confirm whether these changes were intentional or if they may have been made by mistake?

Thank you, and I look forward to your response!
---
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11265612444
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1215887876
KNaing (2025-09-03 02:39:10+00:00): Thanks for your collaboration. Please make sure to draw your buildings as accurately as possible and don't forget to square the building, select them and type 'Q'
s777n (2025-04-06 10:34:29+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы поменяли имя магазина но оставили кучу других тегов от Дикси. Ссылки на соц сети, телефоны и т.д. Чтобы такого не происходила лучше создать новую точку нового магзина и удалить точку старого или хотя бы добавить заметку что старый магазин закрылся. Уже исправлено
Anton Khorev (2025-04-17 10:04:32+00:00): Нет, не лучше, если хочется, чтобы  
- историей изменений можно было пользоваться  
- не сносить тегов типа level или wheelchair, которые обычно остаются актуальными.

Хотя в https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164524730 удаление всей точки не было сделано, wheelchair, тем не менее потёрт был.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-04-09 20:32:05+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164742097
pavvv (2025-04-06 19:04:23+00:00): Ponieważ taką mamy konwencję w OSM, że tylko miasta na prawach powiatu lub powyżej 100 tys. mieszkańców oznaczamy jako place=city. Jeśli się z tym nie zgadzasz, to zapraszam na forum.
pavvv (2025-04-06 19:08:39+00:00): A nawet zrobiłem ankietę. Zapraszam https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/town-vs-city-w-polsce/123756/28
NeisReview (2025-04-05 05:35:29+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164523273
jwsaa (2025-04-04 18:38:50+00:00): Muutos ei onnustunut. Seuraavassa korjattiin muutos ja irroitettiin metsätie ja moottoritie
KNaing (2025-09-02 03:54:02+00:00): Thanks for your collaboration. Please make sure to draw your buildings as accurately as possible and don't forget to square the building, select them and type 'Q'
Marek-M (2025-04-05 07:39:07+00:00): Nazwy opisowe są nieprawidłowe. Np. taki plac zabaw https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1374817928 wystarczająco opisuje tag `leisure=playground`. Poprawiam.
Marek-M (2025-04-05 07:41:45+00:00): Deptak kinowy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1374817929 nie wygląda na deptak. To są przecież chodniki między budynkami. Nazwa też wątpliwa. Poprawiam.
Aim311_ (2025-07-10 07:41:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1374817909 Skąd wyżąłeś dane o przebiegu tej drogi? W dużej części nie ma jej w terenie! Kierunkowość pominę, bo brak tam takich znaków.
Aim311_ (2025-07-10 07:50:00+00:00): W Trzciance pododawałeś wiele dróg, które są w planach jako w budowie, a np. aktualnej budowy ul. Jana Sobieskiego, gdzie jest budowane "mega rondo" już pominąłeś, a w bezpośredniej okolicy budowy dodałeś drogi i atrybuty np. kierunkowość, których nie ma aktualnie w terenie (niektórych fragmentów dróg nawet nie ma). Edytując staraj się dodawać aktualny stan sieci drogowej. Drogi w planach opisuj jako planowane, nieplanowanych nie dodawaj, te drogi, które są w budowie oznaczaj jako w budowie, nie dodawaj informacji, których nie da się zweryfikować w terenie i których nie jesteś pewien.
Allison P (2025-04-04 19:06:50+00:00): I really appreciate your work in Owyhee County.
barkerid (2025-04-04 20:18:04+00:00): Gosh, I really appreciate all you have done.  The addresses you have tracked down for Owyhee County are amazing!  Thank you!
Frans S (2025-04-05 14:48:44+00:00): Hello, Thanks for mapping.
Please map high buildings correct.
Map the rooflines and move the whole to the groundplan. ( where sidewall meets the ground.)
silversurfer83 (2025-04-04 20:59:00+00:00): Hi :)

Wenn ich hier gucke
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle_parking
dann sollte der Wert "bicylce_parking=lockers" nur auf abschließbare Radschuppen angewandt werden. Du beschreibst hier ja etwas anderes.

Wie sieht es mit dem Namen aus, passt der zum Text hier? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164524810
H@rrah (2025-04-13 13:17:27+00:00): Das stimmt "bicylce_parking=lockers" passt nicht   hier.
Ich denke, dass "lockable=yes" besser sein wird, ähnlich wie bei:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12518728837#map=19/48.760597/8.163687
VictorIE (2026-06-10 06:05:00+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for your contributions.

Could I check, this wooded area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1374823185/ is marked "Aghern Cemetery". That doesn't seem to be correct.
jmapb (2025-04-04 23:28:46+00:00): Hi ccoliva, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset 164530482 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group.
jmapb (2025-04-04 23:28:52+00:00): Hi ccoliva, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset 164530482 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 00:14:14+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17508
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 17:27:35+00:00): Hello!

You used
access=YES
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291996298/history

Have you maybe meant
access=yes
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Farisan HiFi (2025-04-29 06:56:48+00:00): Just fixed it, thx!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 11:53:53+00:00): though note that strict reading of access=yes means that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291996298/history can be used by all modes of transport, including cars

not sure what you want to express with it? that it is open for everything? that it is not closed? that pedestrians can use it?
Farisan HiFi (2025-04-30 17:42:02+00:00): Just modified, another user time ago told me to do the opposit thing.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-09 15:42:16+00:00): is anyone except cyclists allowed to be there?

can you walk there?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-04 19:21:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12729581553
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1096069617

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-04-09 19:50:38+00:00): Please provide a source when changing boundaries. Boundary ways should not be tagged with the name. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164525308
KHanne (2025-04-10 14:07:13+00:00): Hello.  The Lansing city boundary was changed to reflect the current city boundary.  I am new to editing in OpenStreetMap.  Can you help me why the updated boundary should not be tagged with the city name?
Baloo Uriza (2025-04-04 22:17:46+00:00): It's a cut and cover tunnel.  Please contact Rivian with your concerns instead.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164525334
jrgutie (2025-04-06 22:46:22+00:00): @baloo you're wrong. I saw this bridge constructed. see https://earth.google.com/web/search/73099/@35.46049706,-97.68890399,388.4522111a,644.08471908d,35y,359.99999728h,0t,0r/data=Cj4iJgokCZtrXPyLFUFAEaow1TUiFUFAGf-4dJXArFfAITIs74QQrVfAKhAIARIKMjAxMS0xMC0xMxgBQgIIAToDCgEwQgIIAEoNCP___________wEQAA
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164525334
NeisReview (2025-04-05 16:53:33+00:00): (Partly) Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164529701
digistrorf (2025-06-14 08:07:56+00:00): Are you sure about 238680308 being an SDA church? I don't think the army cadets have a chappel, and Berri already has an SDA church (243358102)
bob3bob3 (2025-06-14 09:16:22+00:00): Yep the church sign is on the imagery. It reads; "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints - Visitors Welcome". In that respect I appear to have the church type wrong. It seems too that the church building is "out by one" on OSM such that it points to a one within the cadet polygon. Will fix the name and position unless you suggest otherwise.
digistrorf (2025-06-14 13:06:51+00:00): Ah, that makes more sense.

>Will fix the name and position unless you suggest otherwise.

Sounds good to me.

Out of curiosity, what street level imagery are you using?

Cheers.
bob3bob3 (2025-06-14 19:00:14+00:00): Mapillary imagery, my own. I usually do the OSM data input within a few days of capture, often before I upload to the server. My OSM diary has an article on my workflow. Cheers
jptolosa (2025-04-04 22:44:13+00:00): Hola, tengo un par de observaciones:
¿Desde dónde obtienes el dato exacto de altura de cada edificio?
El tag house=residential no se usa y debe ser eliminado.
Saludos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164525957
jptolosa (2025-04-06 05:28:17+00:00): Además le has eliminado el agujero a una casona que parece no ser un "house" que es como lo has marcado.
Tampoco se deben eliminar los objetos y crearlos de nuevo si se quiere corregirlos.
os-emmer (2025-04-06 17:19:40+00:00): Hello Dylan Foster Evans,
you added name:etymology:wikidata to this house:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1374831230
Wikidata-keys should always just include a wikidata-item. Would you mind checking that?

You also added a lot of names to some houses in these areas. Is there anything special (shop, craft, ...) in these houses? Why do these houses have names?
TrickyFoxy (2025-04-04 21:46:59+00:00): Часть корпуса №2 снесли?
os-emmer (2025-04-18 09:32:51+00:00): Hello brianh,
you added here something with amenity=emergency_service:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10311160640
What does that mean? The tag is deprecated and does not have an absolutely clear meaning.
silversurfer83 (2025-04-04 21:00:52+00:00): Hi

ist der GutKauf umgezogen? Denn im Nachbargebäude nördlich ist schon ein GutKauf vermerkt

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164526359
dotic (2025-04-04 21:06:38+00:00): Hi,

seit ich hier wohne (2021) kenne ich den nur in der Rengshäuser Straße 5.
Der nördlich davon existiert nicht.

Beste Grüße

dotic
eggie (2025-04-05 06:33:27+00:00): Hoi Laretto,

Gebruik voor openingstijden deze 'tool'. 
openingsuren-tool

http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

Ik het de openingstijden aangepast aan OSM-format en info samengevoegd met adresnode.
MVG
eggie
Larretto (2025-04-05 06:54:19+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Oke, bedankt voor de verbetering, dan gebruik ik die tool voortaan. Ik zie nu inderdaad dat komma's voor tijden op dezelfde dag zijn. 

Groeten,
Larretto
stosh77 (2025-04-05 14:45:06+00:00): revised.
Dindia (2026-03-31 17:24:25+00:00): Perché avete segnalato Diga Foranea come pista ciclabile? È una zona militare e inaccessibile!
Caralis5 (2026-03-31 20:52:47+00:00): Ciao, attualmente la Diga Foranea di Sant'Elia è accessibile tramite un'entrata presso la spiaggia della Diga, ed è costantemente frequentata da pescatori, runners o chiunque voglia farsi una camminata fino al faro alla fine del molo. Rilevato sul posto.
Dindia (2026-03-31 21:02:46+00:00): Oggi ci sono andato in bicicletta, ma il cancello principale era chiuso. Ho camminato sulla spiaggia fino agli scogli, ma non c'era alcun ingresso, a meno di scavalcare il muro. Ci sono cartelli che indicano che si tratta di una zona militare e che l'accesso è vietato. Quindi sono tornato in città in bicicletta. Dov'è l'ingresso? Credo sia fuorviante indicarlo come pista ciclabile e pedonale ufficiale, anche se qualcuno ci entra.
Caralis5 (2026-04-01 06:59:48+00:00): Sono andato sul posto e ho appurato che l'ingresso da cui si accedeva fino a poco tempo fa è stato, appunto, recintato col cartello "zona militare". Provvedo ad aggiornare la mappa. Grazie della segnalazione.
Dindia (2026-04-01 07:52:32+00:00): Grazie. Peccato che fosse chiuso. Immagino che la vista da lì sia davvero bella.
NeisReview (2025-04-05 16:53:11+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164529002
Frans S (2025-05-06 13:32:51+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping on this project

This task ought to be mapped with the ESRI world imagery as background.

About mapping of high buildings.  They show a large shadow.
Check here how high buildings ought to be mapped.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z7uDwYm4oNmlexHIhJxGCjPpNhCQAgRia5aEJr_4MwM/edit?usp=sharing

Many tall buildings have a small building, a superstructure, lift building or something similar on the roof, do not map it as a separate building, just map the roof lines of the complete building.

Best regards and keep mapping
Allison P (2025-04-04 21:18:29+00:00): Again, please don't remove the untagged ways. I will reuse the geometry in a later changeset refining the landuse and adding names.
4b696d (2025-04-05 17:28:26+00:00): just why?
pavvv (2025-04-05 19:37:08+00:00): It's obvious vandalism. You added layer=1 to the terminal building and made the gates have the same building:levels. They're not the same building.
4b696d (2025-04-05 19:55:53+00:00): Settle down a little bit. You don't seem to know what vandalism is. I did not destroy anything or added features that do not exist or anything like that. Please check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism to find out what vandalism is.

Of course that is the same building. Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings to find out how building:levels is used.
Also, of course it needs layer=1 because part of that building is overlapping the service way as did the smaller buildings before. Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to find out how the layer tag is used. 

Please check out e.g. Warsaw or Gdansk airport to see that what I mapped is quite common.

Please do not randomly accuse people of vandalism.

Please restore my edits.
pavvv (2025-04-05 20:07:28+00:00): Of course you destroyed features. Have you even been to the airport in-person? Buildings like this one shouldn't have the layers since they touch the ground. Otherwise it implies that the POI inside it aren't in the building.
The connectors between the airplane and the main building are seperate buildings and if you notice that they intersect a service way incorrectly, then you can add min_level and layer tags accordingly.