piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisReview (2025-03-28 06:10:10+00:00): #DataImport

Hi, welcome to OSM!

With this changeset, you've added a significant number of features that appear to share similarities in their tags. Could you please let us know more about the source of your mapping activity? Is this a data import?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks!
mueschel (2025-03-29 17:23:33+00:00): Could you check this bicycle parking, it got a strange 'ulock' tag.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12703742720#map=19/40.541773/-112.050004
aweech (2025-03-31 15:15:12+00:00): Yes, it is impossible to use a standard u-lock with this parking. As best I can tell there isn't an established scheme for tagging which kinds of locks can be used with bicycle parking. If you know of one, I could switch it to that.
NeisBot (2025-03-26 23:36:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
RichiesBarber (2025-03-26 23:40:50+00:00): Added a Barber Shop to the map and updated business details.
NeisReview (2025-04-02 15:46:02+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164427687
quantenzitrone (2025-03-26 23:45:38+00:00): forgot to add but source: i was there
eggie (2025-03-27 07:36:26+00:00): Hoi..

Kijk anders even hier wat je onder description kwijt kan. Nu wel erg uitgebreid.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description

Mvg
eggie
molensteen (2025-03-27 00:09:43+00:00): het oude kantoor staat hier en niet meer op de hun site: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31525397
ik moet nog een keer dubbel checken of ze ook nog in het oude kantoor zitten
Pontius (2025-03-27 17:44:26+00:00): Building footprints can be imported from ESRI, Bing, or RapID, usually much more easily than doing it manually.
csimeona22 (2025-03-28 17:01:59+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery, Bing Streetside.
IreuN (2025-04-08 14:23:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/939356893
Czy tam nadal powinno być 
construction=minor ?
tsp15 (2025-04-09 18:04:30+00:00): Nie, to moje niedopatrzenie. Już usunąłem.
rskedgell (2025-03-27 07:15:39+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

In order to add your business, you need to add a new point where it is actually relocated, together with a tag like office=taxi to tell data consumers what sort of thing you are. You probably also want to add tags like website and contact:phone. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/ for details of how these tags work.

You cannot simply rename a residential building to that of your business and change its address. That change was reverted.

If you need any help, please feel free to ask.
user_5359 (2025-03-28 15:15:27+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1371941079 (one of two objects). What is the mean of the tags
    AREA = 345
    CATAGORYCO = 2
    NAME = Anshi NP
    TYPE = NP
?
ChrissW-R1 (2025-03-28 19:12:24+00:00): This looks like parts of a national park. But this was already added to the database. See https://osm.org/relation/18900137
ChrissW-R1 (2025-03-28 19:19:17+00:00): This https://osm.org/way/1371941078 is the other dubious way.
ChrissW-R1 (2025-03-28 19:27:51+00:00): Fixed in https://osm.org/changeset/164223090
StC (2025-03-27 21:10:36+00:00): Bonjour,

sauf erreur de ma part ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je vais tenter la réparation.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 04:32:14+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164574336
jtracey (2025-03-27 02:27:41+00:00): Resolves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4683810
Frans S (2025-03-27 09:36:52+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
wrong tagging highways
mapping  unimportant local traces. Focus on through going traces. (over the edge of the task)

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164144623
NeisReview (2025-03-28 05:57:31+00:00): #DeletionsCheck

Hi, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed many of your changes in this set involve deletions.

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.
NeisReview (2025-03-28 05:57:07+00:00): #DeletionsCheck

Hi, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed many of your changes in this set involve deletions.

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.
NeisReview (2025-03-28 05:56:59+00:00): #DeletionsCheck

Hi, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed many of your changes in this set involve deletions.

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.
NeisReview (2025-03-28 05:56:41+00:00): #DeletionsCheck

Hi, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed many of your changes in this set involve deletions.

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.
NeisReview (2025-03-28 05:56:18+00:00): #DeletionsCheck

Hi, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed many of your changes in this set involve deletions.

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.
fortera_au (2025-03-27 03:58:43+00:00): Hey there, good work! I'd recommend pressing the Q button after drawing a building to square it off, and the only other recommendation would be that some of the buildings you've tagged as building=garage might be better off as building=shed (for example way 1371951932), if you're not sure whether it's one or the other you can just leave it as building=yes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164145846
NeisBot (2025-03-27 03:57:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-04-02 15:47:42+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164177523
NeisReview (2025-03-28 06:04:21+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164146377
Kovoschiz (2025-03-27 09:42:46+00:00): Please don't add transliterations. `name=` should be a commonly used proper name.
Kovoschiz (2025-03-27 09:43:53+00:00): 2. Please don't remove the English from `name=`
rskedgell (2025-03-27 07:00:12+00:00): Your business is already mapped (with your tagging errors fixed) as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12702338567

Are there two of you/your business?
habi (2025-03-31 10:37:14+00:00): Ciao HofTho

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Du hast hier den Werkhof als https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre erfasst, was ein 'Gemeinschaftszentrum' ist. Ich will den Werkhofangestellten nicht unterstellen, dass diese keine gute Gemeinschaft sind, aber in OpenStreetMap ist das so falsch erfasst :)

In der Schweizer Community haben wir das kurz diskutiert, und glauben es wäre 'korrekter' den Werkhof als landuse=industrial + industrial=depot zu erfassen, auch gerade weil du in der Beschreibung erwähnst, dass es *kein* Entsorgungshof ist.

Zusätzlich hast du die Webseite etwas gar generell mit www.ostermundigen.ch angegeben, da könnte gut eine präzisere URL dazu erfasst werden.

Gruss aus der Gemeinde Köniz :)
Habi

Bei irgendwelchen Fragen gerne hier in den Kommentaren nachhaken oder bei https://c.osm.org/c/107 eine Diskussion eröffnen, wir versuchen gerne zu helfen.
habi (2025-03-31 10:45:34+00:00): Ich habe das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164323858 geändert.
Der Werkhof ist jetzt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1373329611, die Baustelle neben Werkhof und O'Bloc, die auf den swisstopo Bildern sichtbar ist, habe ich auch grad erfasst.
蕉饼电脑 (2025-03-27 06:54:21+00:00): 为什么要将校名分裂至单独的POI？
habi (2025-03-31 10:48:21+00:00): Hallo HofTHo nochmals.
Hier ist genau wie im vorangehenden Changeset meint Kommentar, dass idealerweise eine präzisere Internet-Adresse angegeben werden sollte.
In dem Fall hier fände ich https://www.ostermundigen.ch/de/verwaltung/ passend.
Willst du das noch korrgieren?
Gruss,
Habi
habi (2025-04-09 08:58:03+00:00): Offensichtlich nicht :)
Ich habe das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164713290 nachgeholt.
NeisBot (2025-03-27 06:18:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-04-02 15:46:47+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164427719
rskedgell (2025-03-29 19:11:16+00:00): Please could you explain how deleting the cycleway and sidewalk tags here is a "correction"? Was it suggested by a QA tool, or something else?
user_3828331 (2025-03-30 09:28:34+00:00): I hadn't intended to remove the Cycleway or Sidewalk tags, that was an error on my part whilst comparing tags as I was having issues on a routing profile with this one small section of the Fastrack busway
rskedgell (2025-03-30 09:43:23+00:00): No problem and thanks for the quick reply.

I asked because occasionally some QA tools (and the iD editor) can make some unhelpful suggestions, which mappers follow in good faith.
user_3828331 (2025-03-30 09:47:59+00:00): Yea it's fine don't worry, I've added them tags back, sorry again for that mistake on my behalf
user_3828331 (2025-03-30 09:50:35+00:00): I've spotted you've tweaked it more, I spot you added 'Vehicle=no' which causes issues for bus routings, as of course buses are vehicles, are you okay if I remove that 'Vehicle=no' tag please
rskedgell (2025-03-30 09:52:47+00:00): Thanks. I made a couple of other minor tweaks around that junction for cycle routing, but I've left it with bus=yes rather than designated.
rskedgell (2025-03-30 10:06:33+00:00): I see. Having bus=yes or bus=designated should override motor_vehicle=no, vehicle=no, or access=no as the most specific mode should take precedence in routing software.

If something is mapped as highway=busway, as is the case here, I think you can safely remove motor_vehicle and vehicle access tags without causing routing issues for other vehicles.

It might be more of a problem around bus stations where the entry signage on a highway=service road is "no entry except buses" or "no vehicles except buses". Access tags are supposed to follow legal restrictions and in both of these cases, vehicle=no + bus=designated is the effect of the signs. Can I assume that this is the Brouter implementation used in Busmiles.uk's snap to route function?
user_3828331 (2025-03-30 10:14:47+00:00): No it's for my own code creation on another platform, not connected to BusMiles
NeisBot (2025-03-27 06:30:34+00:00): Hi journeyboy789, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 94% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 highway(s)
- 2 building(s)
- 1 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=164148896
fortera_au (2025-03-27 07:11:10+00:00): These are legitimate, there's a major public works project in this area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164148896
NeisReview (2025-03-28 05:37:12+00:00): Thanks for your private message and confirming that the deletions were intentional. 

Details are available in https://www.t2d.sa.gov.au/project-map

#HappyMapping
fortera_au (2025-03-29 03:13:04+00:00): Also just wondering, is Selgar Avenue Link Road signposted, DataSA's Roads dataset has it as just Selgar Link.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164148896
TrickyFoxy (2025-03-27 22:31:07+00:00): 👋 

1. После того как нарисовали здание не забывайте нажимать Q, чтобы выпрямить его

2. Название гаражного массива не нужно ставить на каждый гараж, только на его территорию

3. Вы можете двигать объекты через меню по правому клику мыши. Или нажимать клавишу M
s777n (2025-04-02 16:08:14+00:00): Здравствуйте Вы добавили магазин два раза. На здание и точкой. Исправлено.
silversurfer83 (2025-03-27 16:37:09+00:00): Hi :)

du hast hier allen POI ein "addr:floor=EG" gegeben. Das ist über "level=0" doch schon abgedeckt.

Außerdem sollte die Packstation kein vollständiges addr: schema bekommen. Machen wir bei solchen Objekten idR nicht. Wenn du der Meinung bist, dass du die nächstgelegene Adresse an der Station hinterlassen musst, dann gibt es dafür das "object:*=*" Schema
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:object:*

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164150618
martin-kokos (2025-04-04 16:53:42+00:00): Doporučil bych označit řádně pomocí tagu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:construction
Spolu s označením datumu znovuotevření  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:opening_date
janvarmuza (2025-04-07 05:54:40+00:00): Díky za upozornění, upraveno.
tenzul (2025-03-30 10:08:01+00:00): Hallo FeWo Wedemann,

dein Eintrag sollte wahrscheinlich eine Ferienwohnung kartieren. Du hast jedoch gar keine Daten dazu hinterlegt. Momentan ist unklar was der Punkt bedeuten soll und Nutzer können ihn auch nicht danach suchen. 
Hier ist eine Anleitung:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dapartment
Außerdem ziehst du den Punkt am besten auf das entsprechende Gebäude.

Viele Grüße
NeisBot (2025-03-27 07:48:42+00:00): Hello and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because it appears to follow a pattern that could be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related.

Could you kindly confirm if your map edits were intentional?
#MapWithoutSpam #URLs
Taya_S (2025-03-27 07:55:38+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164151427
histrio (2025-03-27 12:21:09+00:00): Note: For building subsections, use building:part=yes instead of building=part. This aligns with OSM standards https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part . Thanks for mapping!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-28 00:41:55+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17447
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-07 06:40:16+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164618342
Patchi (2025-04-04 19:20:35+00:00): Bonjour planet-ski,

Comme déjà indiqué dans le groupe de modifications 164317127 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164317127) l'ajout de zones résidentielles nommées pour indiquer le nom d'une station de ski est un détournement manifeste du tag landuse=residential (voir la page wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential). Rajouter de nouvelles zones résidentielles au même endroit que des zones résidentielles déjà existantes n’est pas non plus une bonne pratique. Je vous invite une fois de plus à venir en discuter sur le forum OSM France (https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/detournement-du-tag-landuse-residential-comme-station-de-ski/32838/7) avant de faire de plus amples modifications de ce genre, ceci afin de clarifier votre besoin et évaluer les solutions possibles à votre besoin avec les contributeurs de la communauté.

Si vous êtes affiliés au site https://www.ski-planet.com, je vous invite également à lire en détails les droits d'auteurs et licence pour l'utilisation de la carte OpenStreetMap osm.org/copyright car les plans affichés sur le site https://www.ski-planet.com ne respectent pas les conditions indiquées puisqu'il n'y a aucune indication visible de type "© OpenStreetMap contributors" sur les cartes disponibles sur ce site. Vous devez également préciser clairement que les données sont disponibles sous la licence ODbL. Vous pouvez mentionner ceci avec un lien hypertexte vers https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright.

Merci d’avance,

Patchi
NeisBot (2025-03-27 08:12:41+00:00): Hello and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because it appears to follow a pattern that could be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related.

Could you kindly confirm if your map edits were intentional?
#MapWithoutSpam #URLs
Taya_S (2025-03-27 10:01:27+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164155993
NeisBot (2025-03-27 08:12:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
NeisReview (2025-04-02 15:48:58+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164427811
pavvv (2025-04-12 15:56:55+00:00): Mimo tego co podpowiada iD, obszary przystanków autobusowych oznaczamy jako highway=platform bez public_transport=platform ani bus=yes.
voltairovicz (2025-04-12 16:06:37+00:00): No przystanki zmapowane raczej przy okazji i jak dobrze zauważyłeś z ID, nie przykuwalem uwagi jak jest wikipedystycznie poprawnie
maraf24 (2025-08-21 11:32:02+00:00): Dlaczego tu jest natural=wood?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1371994543
NeisBot (2025-03-27 08:36:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
NeisReview (2025-04-02 15:48:30+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164427789
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:26:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
Vinber-Pro (2025-04-14 16:09:22+00:00): Bonjour,
tu as ajouté un building=yes alors que ce n'est pas un batiment ?

je le sors et rajoute quelques batiments

et ensuite à toi :)
Vinber-Pro (2025-04-14 16:14:10+00:00): quelques ajouts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164946743
Rurus (2025-04-17 06:16:05+00:00): Bonjour, 
Je me sens tromper dans ce temps si c'était le cas, mais en général, j'ajoutais une surface de terrain.
NeisBot (2025-03-27 08:39:42+00:00): Hello and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because it appears to follow a pattern that could be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related.

Could you kindly confirm if your map edits were intentional?
#MapWithoutSpam #URLs
Taya_S (2025-03-27 10:02:32+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164156044
NeisReview (2025-03-27 10:14:14+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
fndoder (2025-03-27 13:47:06+00:00): По точке "гора "Лошадинка" - это дубль, уже замаплен объект рядом.

По второй точке - тут не то с названием и расположением. Во-первых, никакой горнолыжки тут нет. Во-вторых, в этом месте уже затегирован такой же объект, но с иным name. То есть если и задавать ему name, то через разные alt_name и т. п., так как это один объект.
habi (2025-03-27 09:15:52+00:00): https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/219d fürs Finden dieser Ways
eggie (2025-03-27 09:51:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Tip:  oneway=no hoef je niet aan wegen toe te kennen. Dat is default. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
AvAars (2025-03-27 10:57:13+00:00): Duidelijk, ik zal de volgende keer de default in acht nemen!
Frans S (2025-03-27 09:22:40+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
Please solve the issues shown by the issue triangle. You connected paths to the residential area. Never connect roads to other objects than roads.
Please connect paths to nearby highways to create a network.
Best regards
habi (2025-03-27 09:15:57+00:00): https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/219d fürs Finden dieser Ways
habi (2025-03-27 09:15:35+00:00): Sorry, dieses Changeset ist zu gross und deshalb nicht schön logisch getrennt.
habi (2025-03-27 09:16:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1273538505 hätte hier nicht gelöscht werden sollen....
habi (2025-03-27 09:17:32+00:00): https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/219d fürs Finden dieser Ways
habi (2025-03-27 09:25:45+00:00): https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/219d
makiwolf (2025-03-27 09:35:53+00:00): Hallo Gerti,

du löscht hier einen privaten Weg der bereits als Privatweg gekennzeichnet ist. Werde das jetzt revertiertieren.

Bitte ganz dringendend das hier durchlesen:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-18 14:17:44+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12704387227/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
TheLNL (2025-04-18 23:18:53+00:00): Yes it is a shop, from its name it sounds like a wallpaper shop (It was added with mapillary imagery). Should I have tagged it as interior design ?
TheLNL (2025-04-18 23:21:29+00:00): I meant interior_decoration not design