piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CanopyFalls (2025-11-28 04:18:41+00:00): This changeset seems to disconnect a few different foot-ways that seem to still be present based on the satellite imagery.
What was the goal with this changeset?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175175036
Mrs Jacqueline Lamberty (2025-11-28 07:22:56+00:00): Hi there and thank you.  I'm not techno savvy and only wanted to remove the diagonal footpath which was incorrect.  I realised when I deleted the incorrect path,  the path along the road had a gap. I tried several times to correct this and failed.  Could you reinstate the path along the road but keep the deleted diagonal path as deleted? This diagonal path removal has been confirmed by the Ordinance Survey but they said they could not change OSM data and I  would have to do it.  Nightmare for a pensioner who does not use technology.
Cebderby (2025-11-28 14:18:54+00:00): I've undone the deletions and made what I hope are all the needed updates and corrections.  I made the entrance way from the south a service road (as there are other properties as well as the farm), the tracks that don't carry public footpaths access=private with gates where I can see them (eg to N ), and all the public footpaths are set as foot=designated, designation=public_footpath on footways and same with vehicle=private where the public footpath is carried by a track. I put the path behind the first hedge at the immediate east of the farmyard. Also had a go at updating the new housing 'Paddock Green' as far as known.  Have a good look at see if anything needs further adjustment, and you can retry changing and/or comment here.
CanopyFalls (2025-11-28 22:38:33+00:00): Ty for the assistance Cebderby! Looks all good now!

And thank you for the detailed response Mrs Jacqueline Lamberty! Thank you for helping to improve the map!
Zrop (2025-11-27 12:51:23+00:00): Hallo OSMeteor,
Schilderbrücken benötigen auch einen "layer" Tag.
Bei Brücken sollten die Wege die auf der Brücke verlaufen mit dem Außenumriss der Brücke verbunden werden.

Gruß
Zrop
Zrop (2025-11-27 12:57:51+00:00): Hallo OSMeteor,
Wege/Straßen unter einer Brücke bekommen kein "tunnel"+"layer" Tag.

Gruß
Zrop
jptolosa (2025-11-29 23:04:33+00:00): Hello, you have confused the old geometry with the new section already drawen of Route 7. I have revert this change.
Regards.
uprkos (2025-11-27 17:51:05+00:00): Adres jest niekompletny.
JoeG (2025-12-04 21:18:02+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contributions! Was the building to the south deliberately deleted? In general it's preferred to adjust existing ways/nodes rather than deleting and remapping. This maintains history of the object.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-11-27 00:24:55+00:00): Hello,
Why did you split highways at intersections? If the ways have the exact same tags and belong to the exact same relations, splitting it is pointless.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-30 19:52:36+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13334868651/history has elevation = 133 that was added in this edit
why not use regular ele= tag?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele
CanopyFalls (2025-11-28 04:13:04+00:00): TY for the improvements to the map!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175176573
Ravi_Nichani (2025-11-27 02:06:03+00:00): Can see the changes
Udarian (2025-11-27 19:05:17+00:00): does this business take up the whole building or just one of meany?
ASA LLC (2025-11-27 19:08:21+00:00): hi. its only one suite. im not sure how to add that or edit. it. first time doing this
Ferrocarriles de México (2026-01-06 00:24:02+00:00): El DRT de Campeche no es tren ligero a pesar de que así lo anuncie el gobierno, así que lo revierto a el etiquetado que corresponde.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176883390
Laveure (2025-11-27 09:48:24+00:00): It is quite concerning that FajrAl, an Indonesian user, has altered the borders using only Indonesian sources. Relying on such material which may reflect an irredentist view is a serious issue.

These edits have already produced strange and inaccurate boundary lines between Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia, which do not match any recognised treaties or established baselines.
FajrAl (2025-11-27 10:38:29+00:00): Hi, this changeset is about the island's coastline, not border. I did getting touch with the community on their Telegram before editing.
Taya_S (2025-12-15 08:46:34+00:00): Reverted deletions. Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19168

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175949428
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-19 05:01:10+00:00): DWG revert – improper deletions / changes

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177405717
KennyDap (2025-11-27 05:33:38+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175181703
InfernoOSM (2025-11-29 05:36:03+00:00): I believe the western part of Mount Ridley Nature Conservation Reserve is now a permanently protected area under Conservation Area 26 - Mt Ridley West (including adjacent Banda Bail Reserve) as of 2025.
https://www.msa.vic.gov.au/conservation-in-action/conservation-areas-program
nevw (2025-11-29 07:46:21+00:00): Thanks InfernoOSM, I’ll try to map that tomorrow.
InfernoOSM (2025-11-29 08:02:36+00:00): I have time to map it now if you'd like, and you can check it out/revise it if needed tomorrow.
nevw (2025-11-29 08:37:32+00:00): Yes, feel free. I’m watching the Aflw grandfinal tonight 🏉
nevw (2025-11-30 03:18:35+00:00): Thanks for mapping this. These new areas are not complete in Capad 2024 and I couldn’t readily find a source available to osm to use to add them all yet. I’ll work through Capad 2024 changes for now. The areas may meet the Capad criteria to make it into Capad 2026 but that won’t be available until 2027. So hopefully a solution is found before then.
KennyDap (2025-11-27 05:33:16+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175181694
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-27 07:03:42+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19038
Hung Tran 9x0 (2025-12-04 09:52:24+00:00): Tôi thấy bạn thêm nhiều địa chỉ mà nó đã tồn tại rồi, ví dụ ở đây ct1 đã có trong tòa nhà fodacon. Tôi nghĩ bạn chỉ nên thêm địa chỉ mà nó chưa từng tồn tại, như vậy khi xem bản đồ sẽ đỡ bị rối hơn.
StC (2025-11-29 13:03:50+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre (probablement en rallongeant un chemin au-delà de son point de jonction avec le point suivant dans l'itinéraire). Je m'occupe de la réparation.
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:50:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:50:43+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Heating and air conditioning services in Whitby"
NeisReview (2025-12-16 17:05:43+00:00): 🔴 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by https://osm.org/changeset/176015492
mweper (2025-11-27 21:25:02+00:00): Hola. 
Gracias por contribuir en corregir la alineación de la calle José de Amenábar, pero como consecuencia a esto, me di cuenta que se rompieron varias relaciones multipolígono y administrativas y las tuve que corregirlas. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175215984

Por favor, recomiendo poner más cuidado al realizar algún cambio donde se incluyan relaciones. 
Saludos.
SaltonSea (2025-12-02 15:57:30+00:00): Hi mweper,
thank you for reaching out and letting me know. I will be more aware of this moving forward. 

traducción automática:

Hola, mweper, 
gracias por contactarme y avisarme. Tendré más cuidado la próxima vez.
moonraver (2026-04-12 08:24:44+00:00): Ahoj,odkial mas info ze chata opatova je penzion a ponuka ubytko? Viem ze dlhodobo tam bolo ubytko pre ukrajincov,potom dlho nic a ze tam robili tabor pre deti minulý rok a ze sa tam preraba areal teraz,ale ze by sa tam dalo zajednat ubytko? Dik za info
mapperue (2026-04-12 08:43:37+00:00): Ahoj, je to úprava spred pol roka. Ak je teraz budova v rekonštrukcii, tak by tam malo byť disused:tourism alebo celý areál disused:leisure=summer_camp.
moonraver (2026-04-12 09:28:08+00:00): v rekonštrukcii je areál, ja som sa pytal na to ubytko, dlho roky tam nič nie je a žiadne ubytko tam nefunguje,pokial viem, lebo som lokal. Máš info, že by tam niečo fungovalo teraz? Ja ani na nete nemôžem nič nájsť, že by sa tam dalo ubytovať. Máš nejaké info o penzióne?
mapperue (2026-04-12 09:42:49+00:00): Ubytovanie v penzióne bolo možné. Ak máš aktuálne informácie, tak ich uprav.
moonraver (2026-04-12 16:11:49+00:00): ved ja sa práve pýtam teba na to ubytko, lebo ja viem,že tam dlhodobo nič nieje a ty si tam pridal guesthouse pred polrokom ak sa nemýlim. Aby som tam nezmazal niečo čo vieš ty aktuálne.Ja chodím okolo a areál je zavertý, privátny. Na nete som ledva našiel 1 starú ponuku ubytka na tej chate.
moonraver (2026-04-12 16:27:36+00:00): niečo som predsa len našiel:
https://www.uzivajsislovensko.sk/accommodation/d1b97b1b-e94c-4753-b806-c03b66bd3431?lang=sk

doplnil som tam teda info ešte. dik za info
lucioperca (2025-12-15 01:02:52+00:00): Hi! This trail is actually on private land and not shown on any public trail maps. I know it's pretty widely used, but my understanding is that is mostly because the land managers do not have enough staff to enforce the use. Based on the Trails Working Group documentation (https://openstreetmap.us/our-work/trails/how-to-map/) I'm going to mark it as "access=discouraged". Does that sound accurate?
DevRaj2010 (2025-12-15 01:20:47+00:00): Sure, that works.
bbdr (2025-11-28 01:42:01+00:00): Sorry! :D
LamLe (2025-12-14 18:41:13+00:00): Hi bạn. 
Mình sống gần khu vực này. Mình thấy bạn tách đoạn sau ra thành alley cũng hợp lí, vì chỗ đó nhỏ. Nhưng vẫn đi ô tô qua được nha bạn. Mình vẫn thi thoảng thấy ô tô chạy vào. Một số nhà trong hẻm vẫn có ô tô á, thấy họ đậu trong sân.
jxpsert (2025-11-27 04:27:12+00:00): Bron vergeten, betreft survey
Tommybara (2025-11-27 09:31:13+00:00): Hi Tuấn! Sao mình có cảm giác là 2 khu phố Tân Lân vs Bửu Sơn nó lộn chỗ với nhau nhỉ? Hiện nay đình Tân Lân nằm ở KP Bửu Sơn, còn chùa Bửu Sơn lại nằm ở KP Tân Lân. Tuấn check lại xem sao.
Trần Thanh Tuấn (2025-11-27 11:29:33+00:00): Không, đặt tên như vậy là đúng rồi. Ngày xưa khu phố Tân Lân là khu phố 5 của phường Hoà Bình, năm 2024 sáp nhập đổi thành khu phố 9 phường Quang Vinh rồi đến ngày hôm nay.

Cho thêm nguồn sáp nhập phường ở Biên Hoà năm 2024 luôn: https://baodongnai.com.vn/chinh-tri/202412/thanh-lap-doi-ten-giai-the-cac-ap-khu-pho-tai-5-huyen-thanh-pho-cua-dong-nai-f512df9/
Tommybara (2025-11-27 17:55:26+00:00): Nguồn đó đâu có kèm bản đồ vẽ rõ khu phố nào địa giới ra sao đâu Tuấn. Ví dụ ở xã Bình Chánh vừa rồi, ban đầu đánh số ấp bắt đầu từ xã An Phú Tây cũ, nhưng rồi cuối cùng phút chót đổi lại đánh từ xã Bình Chánh cũ.

Mình chỉ nhìn các địa danh khu vực đó và rõ ràng thấy nó không đúng thôi. Người ta đặt lại thành tên chữ cũng phải căn cứ theo địa danh trên địa bàn chứ, vậy mà nay “râu ông này đang cắm cằm bà nọ” rõ ràng là vô lý. Để mình thử tìm nguồn bản đồ.
Tommybara (2025-11-27 18:10:07+00:00): Đây mình lấy ví dụ chỗ này: https://tranbien.dongnai.gov.vn/vi/organs/person/To-05-Dai-bieu-Hoi-dong-Nhan-dan-phuong-18/Chau-Ut-56/

Đây là địa chỉ 1 vị đại biểu HĐND phường: 293/8, CMT8 khu phố Bửu Sơn. Mà hẻm 293 chính là hẻm lẩu tôm 5 Ri và chùa Bửu Sơn đó. Như vậy thì KP Bửu Sơn phải nằm ngay đó chứ đâu thể nào bên chỗ đình Tân Lân được?

Khả năng cao nhất cho sự nhầm lẫn này là thứ tự tên khu phố mới của phường Hoà Bình cũ sau khi nhập vào phường Quang Vinh bị lẫn lộn.
nevw (2025-11-29 02:26:55+00:00): Hi, osmi picks up these errors for you to correct
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=130.84876&lat=-12.42304&zoom=14
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:50:46+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Self storage facility in Greenville"
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:50:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-13 21:08:32+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175186803
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:38:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:38:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:50:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:50:48+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Moving company"
NeisReview (2025-12-13 21:07:59+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175186700
DanhengOSM (2025-11-27 06:52:08+00:00): 我反思，我不小心开了一个有点大的set（把东侧的一些学校改进去了）
user_5359 (2025-11-27 08:27:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Sorry, but business entries without addresses are not in line with OSM. Please add the street and house number, or we will have to mark this as SPAM.
reverted by https://www.osm.org/changeset/175186599
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:50:49+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

Your changeset was commented because it appears to follow a pattern that could be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related.

Could you kindly confirm if your map edits were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #Name #Comment
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-13 21:07:08+00:00): Thanks for reverting, user_5359
YomanNH (2025-11-27 09:55:06+00:00): Do not glue street side parkings to roads. I fixed it.
Additionally, changeset description is not a place to advertisement. "created parking road based on the field" is enough.
RahilPasha (2025-12-04 00:37:47+00:00): Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you.
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-18 09:23:42+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее
AndyB_66 (2025-11-29 19:55:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian - zastosuj się, proszę
Eebie (2026-01-04 20:04:33+00:00): Diverse wijzigingen van path naar footway teruggedraaid omdat de toegang per fiets niet verboden is omdat het anders onmogelijk zou zijn om van parking naar de fietsenstalling te geraken
MaciekMma (2025-11-29 06:48:46+00:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FF8JFUnTdF4
AndyB_66 (2025-11-27 09:52:50+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
olo81 (2026-07-04 17:15:41+00:00): Nazwa opisowa do wycofania 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65495095 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
literan (2025-11-27 20:28:16+00:00): а зачем мержить элементы, находящиеся на разных уровнях? это принципиальная ошибка, layer как раз для элементов, которые не пересекаются. Отменю правку.
Szymson (2025-11-27 17:04:44+00:00): Co to za opis zestawu zmian? "zmiany"? Co dokładnie masz na myśli? Jakie jest źródło tych zmian?
Szymson (2025-11-28 16:58:22+00:00): Kolego, odpiszesz czy nie? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454100035 Przepust też zepsułeś?
AndyB_66 (2025-11-27 09:51:58+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
AndyB_66 (2025-11-27 09:51:15+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
martinst (2025-11-27 16:19:50+00:00): Hallo Pronto20 und willkommen bei OSM,
bei name= werden nur Eigennamen eingetragen, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name
Wege innerhalb eines Schutzgebietes erhalten das access-Tag des Schutzgebietes, in diesem Fall also:
access:conditional=discouraged @ (Dec 1-Apr 15)
Kannst Du deine Eintragungen nochmals überarbeiten?
Gruß Martin
Miraj Hair (Pvt) Ltd (2025-11-27 09:09:52+00:00): Updated business details for Miraj Hair Sri Lanka. Added correct category (beauty_salon + hair_replacement), multilingual names, opening hours, services, and contact information based on verified local knowledge.
arjunaraoc (2025-11-29 09:31:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175267904#map=19/17.025713/81.775597
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175188388
eggie (2025-11-27 09:40:34+00:00): De official_ref staat gewoon al correct in OSM. Neem bij dit soort ingrijpende wijzigingen contact op met een van de inframappers. Dan kom je er wel uit.
Voorlopig draai ik deze changeset terug.
Contact kun je opnemen met
Jeroen van der Gun
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JeroenvanderGun

en/of

A67-A67 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/A67-A67

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-11-27 09:46:47+00:00): Ik zie dat je al contact hebt gehad via opmerkingen op de kaart. Ik stuur je changeset even door naar A67 A67
M'n revert heb ik teruggedraaid. 
MVG
eggie
A67-A67 (2025-11-27 09:58:54+00:00): A4 stond al in official_ref. Deze wijziging lijkt me fout. Volgens mij haalt de nieuwe mapper de betekenis van tags door elkaar.

Jeroen heeft eerder het wegnummer inclusief rijbaanletters uitgebreid getagd op deze verbindingswegen. Ik ben benieuwd naar zijn mening.
eggie (2025-11-27 10:05:50+00:00): A67 A67 Bedankt voor de check.. 
Ik stuur de changeset even door naar Jeroen...
Voorlopig draai ik de changeset weer terug naar de situatie voor de wijziging door  Macchill.


Changeset https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175188613

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-11-27 10:11:00+00:00): Laatste revert middels changeset #175190594
JeroenvanderGun (2025-11-27 21:02:32+00:00): Het onderscheid tussen ref A13 en official_ref A4 is hier gemaakt, omdat dit stuk weg formeel-administratief gezien een verbindingsboog van de A4 is, terwijl het functioneel gewoon de hoofdrijbaan van de A13 is (waar het vanaf de onderdoorgang Prins van Oranje ook formeel in overgaat).

De tag official_ref in combinatie met carriageway_ref klopt met wat er op de hectometerbordjes staat (A4 x). Dat je de tags zo moet lezen, staat ook uitgelegd op de wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:carriageway_ref#Netherlands
eggie (2025-11-27 21:05:48+00:00): Jeroen,  Bedankt voor de uitleg en de check.
Groet
eggie
Macchill (2025-11-28 07:31:14+00:00): Duidelijk verhaal, dank hiervoor. Excuses dat ik wat eigenwijs ben.
Wat alleen het probleem is dat stukje snelweg op de kaart nog als A13 te zien is, terwijl de hectometerpalen A4 aangeven (zoals de official_ref inderdaad aangeeft). Waardoor er tijdens een mogelijk 112-proces verwarring kan ontstaan over hoe deze weg daadwerkelijk heet (de OSM-kaart wordt vaak gebruikt als GIS). In de meldkamersystemen staat deze weg namelijk wel als A4 te boek (met alle toevoegingen van de flyovers). Dit zou een snelle hulpverlening mogelijk kunnen vertragen.
Groet, Macchill
GrabTH_Bulakorn (2025-11-27 09:32:03+00:00): Edit brief: Adding village area #https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/143 #grabosm
bartgron (2025-11-27 21:27:30+00:00): Opis zestawu zmian to nie miejsce na reklamę
bartgron (2025-11-27 21:27:39+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
arjunaraoc (2025-11-29 09:26:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175267585#map=16/16.76628/80.28681
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175188869
arjunaraoc (2025-11-29 09:08:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Use JOSM for more productive mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175188989
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-27 18:53:08+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13335609025

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-27 21:52:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13335609025

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
arjunaraoc (2025-11-29 09:05:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175267175#map=17/15.904998/79.334269
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175189073
arjunaraoc (2025-11-29 09:33:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175189073
Dimitar155 (2026-03-12 19:53:05+00:00): Здравей, 

Защо така влачиш връзките на магистралата по основното трасе?

Виж за пример как елегантно са го направили в други държави:

Германия https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/50.056202/8.340098
Франция https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/47.28961/2.04289
Обединеното кралство https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/51.50471/-0.62006
Полша https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/52.20755/21.52845

Поздрави,
Митко
foreigner037 (2026-03-12 20:13:36+00:00): Честно казано нямам идея какво имаш предвид под влачене. За мен връзките си изглеждат абсолютно нормално.
Dimitar155 (2026-03-12 20:24:16+00:00): Имам предвид почти паралелния участък на основното трасе и магистралните връзки. Например при Алдомировското блато, съвсем спокойно връзките могат да са с 100 метра по-къси в частта към магистралата (т.е. да започват по-късно и да свършват по-рано).
foreigner037 (2026-03-12 20:28:45+00:00): Доколкото ми е известно това е чисто козметично и няма никакъв ефект върху логиката отдолу. В този смисъл за мен плавно преливащи връзки изглеждат по-добре от чупките, които се виждат в примерите по-горе.