piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2026-03-04 08:24:30+00:00): Voorrang voor fietsers aantonen? Dat zou volgens niet kunnen door eigenschappen toe te voegen aan de highway=crossing.
Op de veel rotondes krijgen de fietsers voorrang.
Wanneer een fietspad helemaal vrij ligt is het vaak toch weer anders en hebben de fietsers juist geen voorrang.
In dat geval kun je highway=give_way toevoegen aan een node op het fietspad waar de haaientanden zich bevinden. 
In hoeverre routers dit echt gebruiken is maar de vraag.
Ze zouden 'strafpunten' in tijd  kunnen toekennen aan een give_way. 
Daarom zetten we verkeerslichten ook op een node verbonden met de weg/fietspad.
wpasman (2026-03-04 08:29:13+00:00): Yes ik volg de redenering. Haaietanden op het fietspad zetten matchend met het wegbeeld.

Maar op OSM op fietspaden ontbreken zulke markeringen iha. Daarom wordt bij ontbreken in planners geconcludeerd geen voorrang. En dat wringt nu net als het wel goed geregeld is voor fietsers zoals hier. Vandaar dat ik zocht naar een marker voor de crossing zelf oid
eggie (2026-03-04 08:35:26+00:00): Ik heb even geen oplossing..  
Volgens mij is dan de default.. gewoon voorrang.
Heb je als fietser geen voorrang dan een give_way op het fietspad.  Daar kan een router wat mee. Bv een tijdstraf. 
Stel anders je vraag even op het forum en zet dan deze link erbij.
Korte vragen.. korte antwoorden.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/korte-vragen-met-hopelijk-een-kort-antwoord/127479/360
wpasman (2026-03-04 12:46:47+00:00): Bedankt voor het meedenken, alle uitleg en de link! Ik zal eens even kijken op de community
TheNightRider (2026-03-03 21:08:33+00:00): Rationale for changing addr:street from "Highway 228" to "OR-228". The signs don't say "Highway 228" or "OR 228" or "OR-228" but just "228". However, the sign shape tells us it's an OR state highway. This is similar to UT where they use the beehive shape. CO signs have a stylized "CO" and TX signs say "TEXAS". Saying "Highway 228" isn't sufficient because that doesn't specify if it's county, state, or federal. All in agreement?
bxl-forever (2026-03-04 01:15:54+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for your contribution.  However, it raises a few questions.  You named those two points as "meeting points"… but at the same time you tagged them as offices.  Therefore, they will be presented to map users as offices; people will expect to be able to purchase tickets there.

What are those two places, exactly?

Thanks in advance.
Chris Pakosz (2026-03-04 12:43:01+00:00): Hi, I couldn't find tag of meeting point thats why i chose office. I or someone from my company is there often available on location and people can talk to us and join the tour or schedule tour for following days.
NeisBot (2026-03-03 21:15:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/32820499 v21

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Hotel Florence"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-12 05:33:14+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179733812
(Restore previous tags)

 If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
OsmIdf (2026-03-06 13:57:54+00:00): Bonjour, pourquoi avoir changé "Les Jardins de LaVallée" en "La Vallée" ? Sur la plaque de rue c'est LaVallée et c'est le nom de l'écoquartier https://www.chatenay-malabry.fr/lavallee/ Le nom fait référence au fondateur de l'École Centrale Alphonse Lavallée https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alphonse_Lavall%C3%A9e
josmougn (2026-03-06 15:31:17+00:00): C'est une erreur. Vous avez une source référence concernant le choix du nom en hommage à A. Lavallée ?
Si c'est Lavallée pourquoi l'écrire LaVallée ?
Si c'est un nom propre de personne, on devrait dire "Jardins Lavallée", non ?
Ce nom est source d'erreur, cf la surface "park" (qui à mon avis devrait être taguée avec autre chose que leisure=park car ce n'est pas vraiment un parc) : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1303723449 .
Erreur de la BD Topo IGN "Jardins de la Vallée".
Erreur aussi sur la plaque de l'arrêt de bus où on peut lire "la Vallée" (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1922025878743271&lat=48.76129989999998&lng=2.290484200000037&z=19.482681659099427&focus=photo&x=0.47773825036003337&y=0.44948819402074625&zoom=0.2945139557266601)
OsmIdf (2026-03-06 16:33:15+00:00): Sur la plaque de rue, c'est bien LaVallée avec V majuscule. Cet écoquartier est construit sur l'ancien site du campus de l'École Centrale avant son déménagement. Voir https://hds.hauts-de-seine.fr/magazine/le-cercle-vertueux-de-l-ecoquartier-lavallee/ pour la référence à A. Lavallée.
ieguy3 (2026-03-03 21:37:50+00:00): murrieta's city website says construction begins this summer
Brummelwuff (2026-03-09 12:23:18+00:00): Moin, du hast mit der Änderung die Route osm.org/relation/13258788 unterbrochen.
no details provided here (2026-03-18 18:54:09+00:00): It's best practice to use sentence case not block capitals for shop names unless this is how it is displayed on site.
Veganarchocommunist (2026-04-21 14:30:57+00:00): The sign is written in block capitals on site.
Wildsharky (2026-03-06 03:59:04+00:00):  Reverted in changeset id: 179379106
NeisBot (2026-03-03 22:03:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/32196968 v11 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/32548148 v9 | 4 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179324867
NeisReview (2026-03-12 05:33:16+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179325022
jkoe (2026-03-07 17:43:10+00:00): ich nehme mal die socket:tesla_supercharger_ccs* raus. Der Tag ist deprecated, der richtige CCS Eintrag von dir ist besser und die Kombination ist verwirrend (als gäbe es je dispenser 2 Stecker)
stillhart (2026-03-07 18:59:44+00:00): Verständlich. Problem ist etwas, dass die Equivalent sind die Ankündigung zur Umstellung etwas kurzfristig war. D.h. kann man vorerst beides lassen. Zumindest so gelesen.
jkoe (2026-03-07 21:03:10+00:00): Kennst du irgendwelche Datenauswerter die wirklich die tesla_supercharger_css anders interpretieren als ein normales type2_combo? das wäre ja der einzige Grund den ich sehen würde, einen „langsamen“ Übergang zu ermöglichen. Oder warum würdest du es behalten? 

Ich finde ehrlicherweise sowieso den socket:tesla_supercharger_css ziemlich unnötig. jetzt will ich herausfinden, warum es den Tag überhaupt gibt...
stillhart (2026-03-07 23:19:14+00:00): Bei OSM ist es immer schwierig herauszufinden wer wo wie die Daten braucht :-)

Generell ist das Chargerthema ein leidiges. Tesla war früh und zuerst, d.h. socket:tesla_supercharger_css aber heutzutage ist es halt generisch. aber je nach Kontinent ist es dann wieder etwas anderes. Aber so sind und waren halt viele Supercharger getaggt.

dann kommt noch socket:, die dinger sind alle kabel, keine Sockets. sockets gibt es wenn überhaupt bei typ2, aber nicht beim combo. 

Ergänzt wird das durch die fehlenden Felder in iD. Die Stecken da auch in zig diskussionen fest...
stillhart (2026-03-07 23:19:51+00:00): (soll heissen, mir sollen alles recht ein, hauptsache konstistent durchgezogen)
Wildsharky (2026-03-06 03:57:47+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 179378341
NeisBot (2026-03-03 22:39:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13615807265 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Academia de musculação"
---
Por exemplo, uma versão mais neutra e factual do seu texto poderia ser: "Academia de musculação"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-12 05:33:14+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/179403932
Wildsharky (2026-03-05 06:38:21+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 179377384
dmcg12 (2026-03-03 23:25:19+00:00): JOSM glitched out and uploaded this changeset without a comment or source. The source is UGRC, and I added street name prefix directions to addresses and roads.
あじさか (2026-03-04 04:36:50+00:00): Hi, talbertdoi
Please review the project instructions before mapping:
https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/27165/instructions

When using Bing imagery in this area, please make sure to apply the appropriate imagery offset.
Do not create or move features without correcting the imagery alignment.
russellwclough (2026-03-03 23:41:51+00:00): Add Flock surveillance node (Flock Safety "Falcon" Series
 AI-enabled ALPR Cameras with integrated Flock Raven audio detection and gunshot locator system.
felipeeugenio (2026-03-04 13:44:31+00:00): Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones. Pero es claro que las bases de las casas no tienen esas formas. Puede cuadrarlas con la letra Q. Modelar un par y luego copiar y pegar. Así como están lamentablemente no tiene remedio. Además las dejó separadas cuando están pareadas.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179327082
Joske1020 (2026-03-19 20:45:37+00:00): ik vind https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15729595 verdacht (vind er niks over op het internet). Ja je hebt de naam van dat natuurinrichtingsrapport, maar degene die verantwoordelijk was voor de hydrologie heeft enkel de kaartlagen bij de bronnen gezet (die dus niet de namen van de talloze vijvers bevatten)
heb jij ooit al gehoord van die place-drasse? klinkt als plasdras(zones), wat natte zones tegen de waterloop zijn. enig idee?
Eebie (2026-03-23 14:09:03+00:00): Vier kaarten in Projectrapport Natuurinrichting 
Vijvercomplex Bokrijk-Kiewit  door VLM in opdracht van Agentschap Natuur en Bos zijn de bron. Informatie over de studie of kaart waar zij de namen van de vijvers haalden is bij hen op te vragen.
Udarian (2026-03-04 00:23:45+00:00): Thanks for this
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-04 05:37:33+00:00): Of course, man! SEO spammers are everywhere these days, unfortunately.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-03-04 05:38:15+00:00): (Oops, replied with my other account, heh!)
Wildsharky (2026-03-05 06:37:00+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179346770
jackfrost1031 (2026-03-05 14:02:04+00:00): I’m new to this. But the camera has been removed. I drive by it daily.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-04 17:59:20+00:00): Hi Jon, welcome to OpenStreetMap! We're glad to see you join our NRV mapping community. Feel free to join the OSM US Slack https://openstreetmap.us/get-involved/slack/ and other local channels to stay in touch.

Mapping access tags for private and semi-private roads is definitely something that has considerable room for improvement around the area, so thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179328521
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-04 17:59:29+00:00): I did noticed you changed the driveway to a highway=living_street, which is a specific legal designation of type of _public_ residential street marked by specific signs found mostly in Europe where pedestrians and cyclists have a legal right of way over vehicles. By contrast, house driveways are tagged `highway=service + service=driveway`.

Also, it seems this driveway was previously incorrectly named by another mapper as as "Royal Lane", which is in fact the name of the next public residential street to the south, and the house it serves has the address of Farmview Drive, not Royal Lane (unlike the houses on the actual Royal Lane).

Would you like to address these issues yourself, or would you like me take care of it? Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179328521
OSMJon22 (2026-03-06 01:01:03+00:00): Go for it.  I'm mostly trying to clean up walkable/runnable roadways.  I'm happy to collaborate, but unlikely to join the slack space.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-06 17:20:14+00:00): Fixed in changeset #179427553: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179427553
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-04 17:59:49+00:00): Hi Jon, thanks for clarifying this!

It seems that while it is marked private, the other tagging of the residential street you split it from is mistakenly retained, as it is still tagged as a residential street (`highway=residential`), with a 25 mph speed limit (`maxspeed=25 mph`), a `name` of `Lynn Drive`, and (less critically) the various `bbug:` import tags corresponding to the public street. Like the other instance, as a private driveway it should instead be tagged `highway=service + service=driveway` and those tags removed. Happy to take care of this for you if you like!

Also, I happened to notice an untagged node was created, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13616074609 , that doesn't appear to modify its parent way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/132781771 . Was this created by accident (can be easy to do sometimes), or was there some intended purpose here? Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179328589
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-06 17:21:10+00:00): Fixed in changeset #179427935: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179427935
keithonearth (2026-04-14 01:33:53+00:00): Are these footpaths part of the final development, or temporary paths in use during construction?
alexandre6 (2026-03-04 14:31:26+00:00): Adicionar este ponto
NeisBot (2026-03-04 02:18:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1485160438 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1485160439 v1 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179329385
NeisReview (2026-03-12 05:33:17+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179382982
Wildsharky (2026-03-06 04:04:22+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 179385168
TrickyFoxy (2026-04-08 13:20:59+00:00): Геометрию здания зачем портить-то?
Glassman (2026-03-04 18:49:50+00:00): Do these roads have signs stating no access or are they just privately maintained? access=private could likely prevent routers from providing directions to a friends to the house.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179329812
SunnySunnySunshine (2026-03-04 19:47:11+00:00): Hi Glassman, thanks for the heads-up. The road signs say private.  I've updated the access for the southern portion of Sunshine Drive and West Road to access=destination. This accurately reflects that these are private residential roads intended only for residents, guests, and deliveries while ensuring that navigation for those specific destinations remains functional.
muralito (2026-03-05 21:14:09+00:00): Hola. ¿Porque "corregiste" con el tilde si no lleva?¿En que te basas?
BigKev97 (2026-03-12 13:59:05+00:00): "Aymara" ahora lleva sin tilde.
Warin61 (2026-03-04 03:05:00+00:00): Changeset comment should be 
Add Caboolture Gliding Club. Add some buildings, fences. Expand parking from node to area.
MassCartog (2026-03-04 14:32:38+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. Features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. They can been seen from aerial imagery, and there is significant heatmap data showing they are being used just as they were mapped. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
literan (2026-03-04 19:35:41+00:00): насчет большой мачты во вдоре, это, как я понял, опечатка? https://yandex.com/maps/-/CPq3JY80
Zkir (2026-03-04 22:10:02+00:00): Cкорее последствия неудачных экспериментов на живых  --людях-- данных. Ты же удалил уже?
literan (2026-03-05 07:19:53+00:00): ага, и двор насытил инфраструктурой
FajrAl (2026-03-07 06:26:49+00:00): tambahkan komentar changeset, daripada kosong dan akhirnya muncul teks "Automatically generated summary"
Mujadid Amirul Fath (2026-03-07 07:25:26+00:00): Maaf, maksudnya gimana ?
FajrAl (2026-03-07 08:04:29+00:00): Sebelum klik submit hasil editan, ada kolom komentar. Di situ disarankan diisi dengan apa saja yang diubah, atau judul perubahannya.
ajmat (2026-03-05 09:35:30+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179386952
felipeeugenio (2026-03-04 12:59:02+00:00): Hola. Estás volviendo a recrear lo que corregí hace unas semanas. Por favor ceñirse al instructivo de la wiki para mapear este tipo de cosas. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle)
Gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179332708
therealzakie (2026-03-10 11:41:23+00:00): 👏
Tinetto (2026-03-12 05:55:45+00:00): Thank you, happy mapping.
mweper (2026-03-07 01:21:09+00:00): ¿Por qué este nombre en este tramo, si la calle con este nombre respectivo corresponde de Norte-Sur?
MountGerizim (2026-03-10 06:12:33+00:00): Hello mweper, Thank you for looking into this. It appears the service way I added the name onto is an extension of the service way 258508469 . Do you think removing the name is more accurate in this case?
FajrAl (2026-03-07 06:29:37+00:00): way/975027105 ini batas administrasi; jika itu jalur air, maka harus petakan fitur baru
Baloo Uriza (2026-04-09 15:55:04+00:00): ref="I 5 EXPR" is wrong, should be "Express".
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-04-09 16:34:42+00:00): When I joined OSM, it appeared to me that the consensus for "special" routes of numbered highways was to abbreviate the modifier in all caps. This meant "Business" became "BUS," "Alternate" became "ALT," and "Express" became "EXPR."
Minh Nguyen (2026-04-13 14:36:21+00:00): That hasn’t been the general practice for many years. Maybe it was an isolated case that we had overlooked?
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-04-14 06:20:02+00:00): I have no idea. When I joined, the only two U.S. Business Routes that existed in my city were tagged as ref=US_xx_BUS, so I assumed that was the norm everywhere.
BerryTrails (2026-03-04 11:21:00+00:00): Hi, AbbasiaCanal  I noticed that a way was created at However, there is no drivable connection in reality. Could you please share the basis or source used to create this connection? Since it was not connected on the ground,  now I have removed it and corrected
Dawid2849 (2026-03-04 08:44:24+00:00): Warto dodać access=no. W Parkach Narodowych nie można się poruszać poza wyznaczonymi szlakami.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-05 10:33:05+00:00): pewnie tak, jeszcze więcej kasowania ścieżek też trzeba wycofać
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-07 09:51:25+00:00): raczej nie dam rady tego dodać, zrobiłem https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5194081
Andrea Musuruane (2026-03-04 08:36:52+00:00): Ciao. Non dovrebbe essere parking:left:authentication:disc=yes? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking#Time_limits Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179333632
f_gonella (2026-03-04 10:13:39+00:00): Hai ragione, grazie! Non ricordavo esattamente la sintassi giusta.
Taya_S (2026-03-04 08:44:10+00:00): Reverted non-existant lighthouses

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179338162
eggie (2026-03-04 08:31:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  De Kasteelllaan heb ik wel iets beter uitgelijnd. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Taya_S (2026-03-04 08:44:11+00:00): Reverted non-existant lighthouses

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179338162
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-04 21:40:37+00:00): Thanks for removing the SEO spam. You do still need to fix the `name` field; "| Adults Only" is not part of the actual name of the hotel as stated on the website you link and thus cannot go there. However, you can provide a much clearer indication of this which is readable by both humans and machines by adding the tag `min_age=18` tag, and optionally a neutral `description` like `Adults-only hotel`. Thanks.
007Transformer (2026-03-05 05:24:10+00:00):  Revert of  179328329
OddlyAngled (2026-03-05 15:15:40+00:00): is 峽 the most common translation for a mountain pass or saddle point?
OddlyAngled (2026-03-05 15:16:16+00:00): is 峽 the most common translation for a mountain pass or saddle point?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179335249
OddlyAngled (2026-03-05 15:16:17+00:00): is 峽 the most common translation for a mountain pass or saddle point?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179335249
ajmat (2026-03-05 07:33:59+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179382198
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-14 06:12:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1372940412/history

are you sure there is artwork there?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-14 06:13:03+00:00): though maybe given https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4362153590/history this edit is not endorsing it at all?
SimonPoole (2026-07-14 12:19:49+00:00): Exactly I suspect that there is nothing there, at least that is what the imagery implies, maybe there was a buoy or something back then.

In any case this changeset is about improving the overall geometry of the border, not fixing every possible issue with them (we are ungluing linear objects where possible) with an reasonable effort).
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-14 13:00:20+00:00): I initially got confused and though you added this artwork, only later I noticed that it is result of node merge

sorry for noise
cory171185 (2026-03-04 07:45:52+00:00): The added streams are in fact *west of Hebron. Mistake in the changeset comment.
FUZZY_42 (2026-03-04 16:39:22+00:00): 17 добавленный сегодня гидрантов. Они на самом деле существуют в тех локациях что вы указали. Или у вас другие задачи решаете через мепсми???
eggie (2026-03-04 08:43:49+00:00): Hoi,
Lijkt me helemaal correct.
Groet,
eggie
acirep (2026-03-04 08:46:42+00:00): Mooi! Bedankt!