piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2025-07-23 03:39:24+00:00): Hi, Emma. If you do not tag the features you map then the data base won't know what the geometries you digitised represent. I applied tags to buildings you mapped. The features I flagged likely envelope multiple buildings. consider what the footprints under the roofs look like. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168318006
Baloo Uriza (2025-07-01 13:19:35+00:00): East and Lane should be spelled out.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168318027
mavl (2025-07-01 07:34:27+00:00): Здравствуйте. "стоянка" - это не название объекта.   
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F  
  
О стоянках можно почитать на странице:   
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9F%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BA%D0%B0
MassCartog (2025-06-30 20:17:16+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. In this changeset you removed a ton of homes only to replace them with worst outlines and no tag information. You have destroyed street and house number information. This is not a good edit. Could you explain what you are trying to do?
Sap Evidential (2025-06-30 21:28:22+00:00): I have never liked how wonky they were so I decided to simplify them. I will put in the house tags later since I want to do the whole prosperity region first so I can easily select them all at once.
Evidential (2025-06-30 21:40:46+00:00): Oh nice I found my account password. I will be editing on this account from now on
MassCartog (2025-07-01 02:23:51+00:00): Okay, make sure to get back to these house numbers! Keep in mind its good practice to "Keep the history" see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Also, if you are just making building outlines, checkout rapideditor.org it will speed up this process and be way more accurate than rectangles.
NVBW_Edit_mcliquid (2025-06-30 18:02:07+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
santamariense (2025-09-30 00:28:36+00:00): Thaigonmendes,

Você está recorrendo em classificar vias fora das regras. O que te leva a classificar todas as vias dessa localidade como terciárias? Qual a tua motivação?

No OSM só faz sentido mapear vias como terciárias onde, dentro dum conjunto de ruas, tem algumas que se destacam, o que comumente se chama de vias coletoras. Neste caso onde você elevou um beco para tertiary, não tem malha de ruas. É apenas uma rua local, e por ser assim, deve ser mapeada como residential. Nada além disso.

Já expliquei com mais detalhes em:
* https://osm.org/changeset/168655367
* https://osm.org/changeset/164585411
Gregory Peony (2025-07-24 03:42:09+00:00): Hi, all of the footprints you added here represent buildings in the imagery and they have been appropriately squared. Some could be more accurately positioned (m), oriented (r) and sized (shift+(-/+). Please remember to tag the features you map. Why did you use bing to map here? The custom source for the project has a much greater resolution and is more recent. Your mapping should reflect the primary source of a project. Thank you for your contribution.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168318798
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-01 05:20:46+00:00): Can you explain why?

Note that people tried to contact you in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167932088
user_23026288 (2025-07-01 11:17:43+00:00): Route doesn't carry long-distance traffic east of Selma.
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-07-01 07:14:07+00:00): Moin CaptainCarte,

tunnel=yes ist falsch! Das ist kein Tunnel sondern ein Parkdeck! Welches Problem wolltest Du lösen?
george1201 (2025-06-30 21:12:00+00:00): Warum sollte man nicht gleich alle 43 Vorkommen der Kombination public_transport=departures_board + departures_board=realtime + amenity=clock in Karlsruhe korrigieren?
george1201 (2025-06-30 21:15:24+00:00): In finde sie deutschlandweit auch nur noch in Philippsburg, Stutensee und Baden-Baden. Scheint also eine lokale Besonderheit zu sein.
Nakaner (2025-07-01 08:50:42+00:00): Ich habe nur die Note abgearbeitet. Du kannst den Rest ruhig gerne erledigen.
citrula (2025-06-30 20:47:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. Whenever possible, please try to realign the existing building geometry rather than deleting and redrawing it. This preserves the history of the object and helps future mappers!
NK-Mapper (2025-07-03 21:23:25+00:00): Apologies
NeisBot (2025-06-30 17:36:54+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-02 12:26:22+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168338852
dadavid (2025-09-25 08:23:53+00:00): Hi, the guy is being weird again, can you check the way history and see if it needs fixing again? 

Cheers :) 

david
GPYes (2025-09-26 22:41:00+00:00): Hello David,

Are you able to provide any further information regarding this street name? I will also reach out to editor Klaus Schlupp for further clarification. 

Thank you!
NeisBot (2025-06-30 18:07:57+00:00): Hi Luigi172, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Removed name tag from a way, modifying its description."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
rempshaener (2025-06-30 20:30:06+00:00): Hallo,
hier führte jetzt der Weg auf eine Terrasse, wo definitiv kein Weg hingehört.
Bitte immer darauf achten, inwieweit bei Maproulette echte Fehler selektiert sind - hier wäre eine Trennung der Wege an der Kreuzung sinnvoller gewesen.
Ich habe entsprechende Korrekturen vorgenommen.
Viele Grüße
b-jazz (2025-07-01 03:21:33+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/894465889

The lines that define fairways, greens, bunkers, water hazards, and tees should never intersect (partially overlap) each other and we noticed that they are overlapping in one or more of the feature pairs in this changeset. Objects that are joining each other should *share* nodes on the border, but not cross over each other. Alternatively, you can go around one of the objects and leave a small gap. For instance a fairway polygon that skirts around a bunker. Please read this wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions, please reply here and I'll gladly help clarify things. Thanks!
jhaluska80 (2025-06-30 21:13:55+00:00): I know you're new, but the correct thing to do is to keep the road and change the lifestyle prefix, add barriers, and/or access levels depending on how it's closed/removed.

Otherwise people unfamiliar with the area come back and re-add it accidentally and we have to go through this again.

Properly tagged will prevent GPS systems from using it.

Do you know how it was closed?
Hypsometric (2025-06-30 22:45:40+00:00): Came here to say the same thing. Should we revert the edit and update tags?
jhaluska80 (2025-07-01 00:32:41+00:00): They recently added the circle.

https://www.avonoldfarms.com/old-farms-road-project-update

Their website was having issues so I could not find out what happened to the original road.

BC720, if you know if the road was closed or demolished we can update it appropriately.

Hypsometric, If you want to revert and change it to demolished feel free. I'm ok waiting for a response.
Hypsometric (2025-07-01 01:12:06+00:00): I have reverted the edit (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168331594) and set access=private until we can get some more details.

BC720, sorry for the trouble. We are glad to help with getting this mapped correctly. We just need to know a little more info about this road. For example, is it abandoned or is it on private property now? Are there signs at either end of the road? Any of that info will be helpful.
BC720 (2025-07-23 14:17:22+00:00): No problem. That road is just simply closed after they added the circle and new road. There is no sign at either end of the road. The north end is completely blocked by the new Old Farms Road and the south end is blocked by some kind of gate. That road is 100% closed forever. 

The reason why I started this change is my Tesla navigation is trying to keep using the map. Thank you and sorry for the late response!
citrula (2025-06-30 20:49:58+00:00): is this really called "House of Shih Tzus"?
eggie (2025-06-30 22:22:48+00:00): Dag Jordi...

Je vraagt feedback.  Formeel hoef je niet het adres toe te voegen, maar dat zie je wel meer. Scholen en kerken worden vaak zo op het vlak  getagd.

MVG
eggie
BCNorwich (2025-07-02 05:33:38+00:00): Fictional bridge removed, Way:1410976204.
elot360 (2025-07-09 18:48:05+00:00): Czy dla DK94 kategoria "trunk" nie powinna zostać rozciągnięta do Dąbrowy Górniczej, w której dopiero zaczynają się skrzyżowania jednopoziomowe? A jeśli światła w pobliżu przystanku Środula K-D są wystarczającym powodem na "nie" to może chociaż przedłużyć do zjazdów z ulicą Północną?
szalona_entropia (2025-07-09 19:10:56+00:00): Do zjazdów na Północną tak, ale jak one wyglądają? Jest gdzieś fotorelacja na FPW?
elot360 (2025-07-09 19:17:04+00:00): Rozumiem spojrzenie w Google Street View będzie niemoralne w kontekście edytowania OSM? Bo od zeszłego roku tam się wiele nie zmieniło
szalona_entropia (2025-07-09 19:45:23+00:00): Zmieniło się, bo w zeszłym miesiącu otwarli tam  jakieś łącznice.
elot360 (2025-07-10 11:33:08+00:00): A ta łącznica co jest przy skrzyżowaniu Frankiewicza z Północną, nie spełnia warunków by wydłużyć kategorię?
szalona_entropia (2025-07-10 12:34:56+00:00): Niby tak.
George Sears (2025-07-01 11:57:34+00:00): Ciao, piuttosto che aggiungere il vecchio nome come nota, puoi aggiungere il tag old_name
Però ho notato che iD (l'editor di base di OSM) non ti propone un campo legato a old_name, quindi per fare ciò dovresti scrollare fino al campo etichette e aggiungere manualmente old_name
In questo caso l'ho già fatto io
ticho2 (2025-07-04 22:12:23+00:00): Ahoj, tu ti asi uslo ze pridany chodnik si nechal nenapojeny na oboch koncoch. Predpokladam, ze sa ale z neho da prejst na severe na tu cestu, a na juhu na schody.
jozefklacko (2025-07-15 21:25:42+00:00): ahoj. dakujem, opravil som to. robil som to v Go Map!! a neviem, to tam urobit. porad mi, prosim ak vies, co je najlepsie na iphone
ticho2 (2025-07-16 08:54:52+00:00): Ahoj, vdaka za opravu. Bohuzial, s editorom ti asi nepomozem, osobne som nenasiel pre mobil ziadny editor ktory by nebol nemozny na pracu. Mozno to bude tym ze maly displej a velke prsty je kombinacia ktora mi znemoznuje pracovat precizne. :)

Ja si v terene vacsinou len nafotim, a doma to na "velkom" PC zanesiem do mapy.

Na mobile pouzivam maximalne tak Street Complete aplikaciu (Android only), na doplnanie udajov k existujucim objektom.
b-jazz (2025-07-01 03:19:16+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1410979347

The lines that define fairways, greens, bunkers, water hazards, and tees should never intersect (partially overlap) each other and we noticed that they are overlapping in one or more of the feature pairs in this changeset. Objects that are joining each other should *share* nodes on the border, but not cross over each other. Alternatively, you can go around one of the objects and leave a small gap. For instance a fairway polygon that skirts around a bunker. Please read this wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions, please reply here and I'll gladly help clarify things. Thanks!
yrtimiD (2025-06-30 23:04:58+00:00): hi, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

when you tag:
access=no
bicycle=yes
highway=cycleway

I think both access and bicycle tags are already assumed because of highway=cycleway so you can omit them next time.
yrtimiD (2025-06-30 23:07:09+00:00): btw, looks like you accidentally connected cycleway to the 5th road passing under the bridge, I think this is not the case as a new cycleway is just a right lane of Moshe Sneh and passes over the bridge.
ping me if you need help with fixing this.
yrtimiD (2025-06-30 23:20:03+00:00): anyway, I did small fixes here, converted both sideway and cycleway to be on the bridge and added several missing traffic lights on all crosses. please validate that all is good now.
yrtimiD (2025-06-30 23:21:49+00:00): and, hopefully last, you changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37558506 from primary_link to residential, this is not correct and there are strict rules regarding road types. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Link_roads and, please, change back.
eggie (2025-06-30 19:48:07+00:00): Dag diederik..

name:nl=....  lijkt me niet correct. Kijk anders even hier in de wiki..
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:short_name

MVG
eggie
Yog Sot (2025-07-01 20:28:50+00:00): hey there, so this change to a `trunk` class road has to be reverted, coz bikes pedestrians or even horses are not disallowed. Their access is known and it is `yes`
`highway=trunk` passes em as unknown by default, so i'm sorry, but no can do. Please fix it up afap before the data will be imported by third-party navigation apps.
szalona_entropia (2025-07-02 09:39:40+00:00): Then it its not a problem with this particular edit. Have a look at majority of main roads in e.g. England and Romania - they are trunk even though they do not prohibit bicycles.
szalona_entropia (2025-07-02 09:42:03+00:00): Anyway, I added the missing agricultural=yes and bicycle=yes tags.
maraf24 (2025-07-05 10:37:39+00:00): Temat był i nadal jest dyskutowany, ale czy osiągnięto konsensus? Czy było głosowanie?
Te ogryzki trunk w Poznaniu wyglądają śmiesznie.
pavvv (2025-07-05 14:01:03+00:00): Dopiero po zaczęciu wprowadzania zmian temat dostał więcej atencji. Niektóre ze zmian szalonej entropii są dość dziwne i będą jeszcze dopracowywane.
save2desk (2026-01-29 13:56:26+00:00): Проехали в понедельник, ворот и забора не видели. Удаляю?
NeisBot (2025-06-30 20:16:57+00:00): Hi Saphira_a, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added contact information and address details to an existing feature."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #NoComment #AIgenerated
jcnl44 (2025-07-01 15:38:46+00:00): Hello,
Why did you do this change?
jcnl44 (2025-07-01 18:10:17+00:00): I reverted preventively the changeset, feel free to answer

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168365668
dzamper (2025-07-19 13:33:47+00:00): dlaczego dodałeś tag `highway:class:pl=trunk_link`?
dzamper (2025-07-18 21:47:28+00:00): Dlaczego dodałeś do niektórych linii `highway:class:pl=yes`?
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-02 05:48:53+00:00): Hello! What do you mean by "possible path"? You aren't sure or there is no path but it might be? Anyway it doesn't look as good name for path
TrickyFoxy (2025-06-30 19:57:00+00:00): Вы удаляете old_name, это не текущее название. Вы уверены в своих правках?
Pent166 (2025-06-30 20:26:10+00:00): У дорог дворов нет названий.
bxl-forever (2025-06-30 20:10:44+00:00): Hello,

Nice work but it is recommended to use a simpler pile of access tags.  Please do not over-complicate them.

Instead of barring everyone (access=no) and then reintroducing access, the correct tag for this kind of situation is:

vehicle=destination
bicycle=yes
horse=yes

No more.

Hope this helps.
Yunan973 (2025-07-01 13:21:50+00:00): Bonjour,

quand tu rajoutes le numéro siret, mets bien le numéro correspondant à l'établissement (14 chiffres) et non le numéro siren (9 chiffres).

Cf. par exemple le noeud 1255346241.

Cordialement
rarity741 (2025-07-01 16:56:15+00:00): Bonjour,

Désolé je ferrai attention à l'avenir.

Cordialement
robryk (2026-06-23 21:33:06+00:00): Hallo,

ich vermute, dass du dich hier verirrt habe: so weit ich mich erinnere, diese Ampel haben das Züri-standardmässiges vibrierendes Blindesignal und kein akustiches. Bist du anderer Meinung?

Falls wir einig sind, dass das irrtumlich ist: Ich habe viele solche irrtumlich markierte Ampeln in Zürich gefunden, so wäre es gut solche Fehlern auszuschliessen durch eine Verbesserung in StreetComplete. Deshalb würde ich dankbar, wenn du beschriebst, was dein Denkprozess beim Ausfüllen war und was denkst du würde für dich dabei hilfsreich.

Mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Robert
user_5359 (2025-07-01 07:53:09+00:00): Hello! Is your description for the changeset https://www.osm.org/changeset/168314985 or yours?
citrula (2025-06-30 22:13:41+00:00): If you mean google Street View, it's not an acceptable source for OSM edits.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

Available sources (bing streetside and NAD) show Corporate Drive - do you think this was a recent change?
lbowyer (2025-07-01 14:06:11+00:00): I work in an adjacent City, and we recently noticed the change. I reached out to the City of Grapevine to confirm if the signage is correct.
lbowyer (2025-07-01 14:19:18+00:00): Thank you for your comment. I did go out and visually inspect that the signage says Parkway, but I also talked to someone at the City of Grapevine's PW department, and the change was made in error when replacing signs. They are working on correcting the sign now.
citrula (2025-07-01 17:24:08+00:00): mystery solved! happy mapping
felipeeugenio (2025-07-07 13:11:07+00:00): Hola.
Buenos días.
El que no haya carteles que indiquen velocidad no implica, en caminos rurales, que sea 100.
Si no hay carteles no agregar nada por favor.

saludos
felipeeugenio (2025-07-07 13:12:09+00:00): Además ojo con los nodos que arrastra, que movió varios caminos varios kilometros fuera de su lugar. Esto fue claramente involuntario, pero hay que tener cuidado.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168325284
CAM-Gerlach (2025-06-30 23:54:15+00:00): Ah great, thanks! One more thing I can check off from my near-term task queue. You planning on doing Turner Street NE too in the immediate future, or want me to take care of that? I wouldn't want to duplicate effort or make conflicting changes. Thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168325430
Jakesname (2025-06-30 23:56:54+00:00): Feel free to go ahead and do NE if you're willing to!
CAM-Gerlach (2025-07-03 00:03:43+00:00): Done in changeset #168420335 ! https://osmcha.org/changesets/168420335
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168325430
AurélienQ (2025-07-04 18:56:02+00:00): Ben non, je re-annule
b-jazz (2025-07-01 03:24:27+00:00): Hi Yamski,

As I mentioned in a comment on a previous changeset by you (http://osm.org/changeset/168241298), you shouldn't have your fairways and greens intersecting. Please make sure this gets fixed and doesn't continue to happen. The link above should contain helpful information about how to map golf courses. Please check it out. Thanks.
AurélienQ (2025-07-04 18:55:41+00:00): Ben non, je re-supprime
bartgron (2025-07-01 20:16:20+00:00): Uprzejmie proszę o stosowanie komentarzy zestawów zmian:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Mammi71 (2025-10-10 11:23:07+00:00): Hallo DerF1Freak,

Du bist neu bei OSM . herzlich willkommen dass Du zu OSM beitragen möchtest.

Als Neuling sind Dir Fehler unterlaufen, Die Dir wahrscheinlich nicht bewusst sind.: die tatsächlichen Gegebenheiten vor Ort klingen zumindest bei der Schulstr. unplausibel. Nur Fuß-, Reit- und Radverkehr ist bei den ganzen Autos auf den angrenzenden Grundstücken unplausibel. Die Schulstr. ist nicht direkt an die B5 angeschlossen. Brücken, Tunnel, Überdachungen, Einschnitte, Dämme usw. mit =no anzugeben ist nicht erforderlich, das wird als Standard implizit vorausgesetzt, nur wenn diese Dinge explizit vorhanden sind, werden sie auch mit *=yes explizit getaggt. 
Falls Du vor Ort bist, kannst Du diese Dinge gern beheben, falls Du Unterstützung benötigst, helfe ich gern. Gib einfach Bescheid.
DerF1Freak (2025-10-14 09:22:17+00:00): Moin,
Der Abschnitt zwischen Schulstraße 9 und 8/14 ist ein Fahrradweg/Fußweg. Es ist mit dem Auto nicht möglich von der Schulstraße 8 direkt auf die B5 zu fahren. 
Da mir dies in der Navigation aber so vorgeschlagen wurde habe ich diese Anpassung vorgenommen.
In diesem Bereich sind auch keine Grundstücke.
Mammi71 (2025-10-16 16:07:59+00:00): Danke für Deine Antwort. Da Du Dich navigieren hast lassen, nehme ich an dass Du nicht in der Nähe wohnst. Vielleicht kannst Du Dich aber noch erinnern, ich würde das gern mit Deiner Hilfe korrigieren bzw. verbessern.
- Rad-/Fußweg: welches Verkehrszeichen genau steht da? Gibt es eventuelle Zusatzzeichen unter dem Verkehrszeichen?
- wie breit ist die der Weg/die Straße?
Diese beiden Dinge helfen, den richtigen Straßentyp besser zu bestimmen (zur Zeit Wohnstraße).
- wo genau stehen die Schilder?
- gibt es sonst noch etwas, was die Nutzung der Straße einschränkt?
- ist Asphalt als Straßenbelag richtig.
- lt. Luftbild ist es rechtsund links der Straße baumbestanden, eine Allee?
DerF1Freak (2025-10-16 17:54:38+00:00): Hallo,
Ich wohne dort in der Nähe und habe testweise eine Navigation gestartet, nachdem ich auf auf OSM umgestiegen bin.
Genaues Verkehrszeichen kann ich nicht sagen, kann ich aber am Wochenende mal prüfen.
Der Weg ist asphaltiert und ca1,5m breit, sodass man gerade gut mit Fahrrädern aneinander vorbei kommt.
Die Schilder stehen jeweils ungefähr am 
 Übergang des grau markierten Bereiches.
Ja links und rechts stehen Bäume, es handelt sich um eine Allee, die Bäume haben aber einen großen Abstand zum Fußweg.
Am Übergang von der Straße in den Fußweg steht auf beiden Seiten ein klappbarer Poller.
aharvey (2025-07-01 00:10:12+00:00): hi the suburb, postcode and state aren't needed since these are already derived from existing boundaries mapped. Indeed these addresses were imported from Vicmap data and we intentionally omitted this data for this reason.