piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
avi32 (2023-08-27 01:15:35+00:00): Revert vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140433583
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:45:45+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438191
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:45:42+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438189
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:45:35+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438186
cholero (2023-09-17 10:39:22+00:00): confirming. can be dangerous for swimmers
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-26 20:20:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11146962619
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11146962620

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:47:15+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438218
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:46:33+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438208
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:46:21+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438203
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:46:28+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438206
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:47:12+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438220
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:47:01+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438217
Spiekerooger (2023-08-26 22:47:32+00:00): these reverts may temporarily not fix the problem with vandalism as those vandalism is stacked and several reverts are sometimes needed to fix the node/relation/way

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140431515
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:47:31+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438232
Spiekerooger (2023-08-26 22:47:05+00:00): these reverts may temporarily not fix the problem with vandalism as those vandalism is stacked and several reverts are sometimes needed to fix the node/relation/way

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140431506
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:47:41+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438234
avi32 (2023-08-26 20:29:39+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140428166
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:48:59+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438265
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:48:17+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438246
avi32 (2023-08-27 00:38:16+00:00): Revert vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140433249
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:48:42+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438255
avi32 (2023-08-27 05:14:35+00:00): Revert vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140436198
avi32 (2023-08-27 00:25:35+00:00): Revert vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140433072
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:48:48+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438261
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:49:18+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438275
avi32 (2023-08-27 05:13:37+00:00): Revert vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140436186
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:50:33+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438292
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:51:07+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438303
Javierpf (2023-08-28 21:33:52+00:00): Hello! Thank you for the updates. It seems your changeset crosses many continents/countries. Please retain your changeset smaller. Let reviewers and other mappers check your edit more easily. It's impossible (almost) to keep track of the database and changes if changes in huge areas.
So I kindly ask you when you edit, retain your changeset in a particular smaller area -such as countries/provinces/municipality- save it first and then move to another area. Examples:
You are adding/modifying 10 objects in 2 distant cities => make 2 changesets, 1 per city.
you are adding/modifying 5 objects in 5 countries => make 5 changesets, 1 per country.
You'll find more information on the reason in this article: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:50:49+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438296
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:51:13+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438310
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:51:25+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438313
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:51:18+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438311
secondaryhighway (2023-08-26 20:46:44+00:00): reverted
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:51:35+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438320
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:51:47+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438323
NorthCrab (2023-08-28 07:24:30+00:00): Witaj na OSM :-) Jeśli rzeczywiście nastąpiło otwarcie drogi to ten zestaw zmian był poprawny. Natomiast jeśli droga nadal czeka na otwarcie, to cofnięcie tej zmiany (co już zrobiliście) jest lepszą opcją. Pomyłki każdemu się zdarzają :P Pozdrawiam!
secondaryhighway (2023-08-26 20:50:37+00:00): reverted
secondaryhighway (2023-08-26 20:50:47+00:00): reverted
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:54:02+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438365
eggie (2023-08-26 21:14:41+00:00): Dag LHFAF
This tag should only be used for the primary entrance to a building.
(of afgesloten gebied) 
Als er meer ingangen zijn. De vraag is dus is dit de hoofdingang.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:entrance%3Dmain
Wanneer ik te voet kom of met het OV  is dit dan de hoofdingang?

MVG
eggie
LittleHelpFromAFriend (2023-08-27 10:54:47+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
Dank voor je reviews!
Ik heb voor deze aanpassing ook zitten twijfelen.
Mag ik je meenemen in mijn denkproces?
Aanleiding: Navigatie (auto) naar Diergaarde Blijdorp in Flitsmeister (obv OSM) heeft als doel een punt midden in de dierentuin. Ik gok het middelpunt van het gebied.
Het object staat in OSM als een weg (is dat juist?) en is een polygoon over de buitengrens van het park. Het adres klopt, maar blijkbaar prevaleert de geodata bij navigeren.
Wat zoeken op fora leek me te leiding tot de gekozen oplossing (puntnode met entrance=main).
"Routing:entrance:main" lijkt beter aan te sluiten, maar heeft nog status proposed. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:routing:entrance
Mijn bedoeling was om de hoofdingang aan te geven (inderdaad ook voor lopen/fiets/OV). Daarnaast is er nog één andere publieksingang en één of meer dienstingangen die eventueel toegevoegd kunnen worden.

Ik heb een aantal vragen:
• heb ik de entrance:main zo goed aangemaakt? (Los van of dit de wenselijke oplossing is)
  - ik las dat hij *op* de boundary moet liggen, maar die omvat het parkeerterrein en de 'poort' ligt hier een stuk binnen. De punt staat nu op de slagboom van het parkeerterrein, maar dit is dus een compromis. Is dit juist?
  - Hoe weet het object dat er een ingang is aangegeven? Ik verwachtte een relatie, maar die kon ik niet vinden.
  - Kan ik de ingang een naam geven? (Bijv Oceaniumzijde)

Of -natuurlijk- is mijn denkrichting überhaupt niet de juiste?

Dank voor het meedenken.
Groet,
Bert
eggie (2023-08-27 11:16:20+00:00): Hoi...  Dit is al wel eens meer aan de orde geweest op het forum.
Hoe vind je de hoofdingang? 
Wellicht nog eens navragen op het forum.
Je ingang staat wel op de polygoon met het adres, maar heeft (nog) geen verbinding met de weg. Misschien nodig voor de routering?

Je edits.. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140428301

Blijdorplaan 8 komt nog een keer voor op één van de gebouwen. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2791993561#map=17/51.92850/4.44491&layers=N

Het is de BAG import adresnode.
Nog een keer het adres op een vlak zetten komt wel meer voor. 
Veel routers gebruiken de adresnodes, maar dat kan verschillen.
De router heeft nu al te dealen met drie identieke adressen. Twee op een node en één op het vlak. 
Lijkt me lastig voor een router. 

Er zijn diverse mogelijkheden om de ingang te vinden, maar of ze goed werken in de verschillende routers is maar de vraag. Dat werkt met een relatie. 
Hier wat leesvoer.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:associatedStreet
Bij flatgebouwen los ik het simpel op door de adresnodes (soms wel 100)  bij de hoofdingang te leggen, maar dat kan hier niet, want het gebied is geen gebouw.

Denk dus vraag even op het forum inbrengen. Toch slecht weer.. dus je zult vast wel een reactie krijgen.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43

MVG
eggie
avi32 (2023-08-26 23:04:50+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140431781
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:55:01+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438390
avi32 (2023-08-26 21:33:54+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140429881
avi32 (2023-08-27 00:08:09+00:00): Revert vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140432882
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:55:23+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438397
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:55:25+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438400
NorthCrab (2023-08-27 06:55:24+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140438399
avi32 (2023-08-26 23:51:46+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140432651
avi32 (2023-08-26 20:49:06+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140428813
avi32 (2023-08-26 21:28:51+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140429763
avi32 (2023-08-26 20:54:47+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140428940
ADAC Touristische InfoSysteme (2023-08-30 10:20:46+00:00): Hey Rodo05, with this changeset you deleted the node for Costa Rica https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/424297465 . Did you accidentally delete it or what was the reason?
felipeeugenio (2023-08-27 13:34:12+00:00): un tip:
Las casas pueden ser "cuadradas" con la letra Q.
Además, si una casa es igual a otra, puede copiarla y pegarla (Control+C y Control+V). Para que queden todas iguales.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140429055
michael_ua (2023-08-26 21:19:37+00:00): Reverted in

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140429570
avi32 (2023-08-26 22:53:22+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140431617
IШIN (2023-08-27 17:10:49+00:00): Можно ли отменить ВСЕ правки avi32 и забанить его? Он испортил очень много...
avi32 (2023-08-28 07:32:20+00:00): Не ошибается тот, кто ничего не делает. Я под миллион вандальных хохлоправок откатил, а ты только серанул в комментах.
IШIN (2023-08-28 11:22:16+00:00): Жаль, нельзя удалить свой тупой коммент. :-( 
Стыдно, конечно, что полез возмущаться, не посмотрев, кто тут ломает, а кто чинит. Приношу свои извинения. Удачи, и спасибо вам всем, кто латает ОСМ после вандалов, за этот неимоверный труд...
fonsique (2023-08-30 09:12:40+00:00): ави спасибо тебе дорогой огромное
и прости душу грешную - не разобрался с мобилы с интерфейсом, каюсь
ps по хохлоправкам - их борба...
felipeeugenio (2023-08-27 13:32:05+00:00): Hola. Gracias por las ediciones.
Pero los cruces se dibujan de totalmente otra manera, tuve que corregirlos ahora. Por favor notar la diferencia.
Si está interesado en aportar a la ciudad de Copiapó por favor unirse al chat de la comunidad OSM Chile en Telegram (app similar a whatsapp) en el link https://t.me/OSMcl.

Saludos
arichnad (2023-08-26 21:41:44+00:00): Source for the horse=no wooden structure on path (way 94413718)

https://www.nps.gov/choh/planyourvisit/horsebackriding.htm
Max Denushev (2023-08-27 07:49:27+00:00): Обратите внимание на указанные названия улиц в ваших правках
neo-plan (2023-10-17 21:08:45+00:00): Каких именно улиц?
Max Denushev (2023-10-18 08:04:37+00:00): Вы внесли изменения, оставив вандальные названия, можете ниже в списке линий это увидеть
neo-plan (2023-10-19 00:34:01+00:00): Я специально не трогал вандальные названия, чтобы те, кто имеет возможность откатывать правки, не откатывали мои вместе с ними. Учту на будущее, что не стоит вообще править объекты с такими названиями.
felipeeugenio (2023-08-27 13:16:19+00:00): Hola. Si el edificio y/o el nodo ya contienen la información del local, no hay para qué duplicarlo en un nodo/edificio adicional.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140430594
Hufkratzer (2023-08-27 18:53:17+00:00): Hi,
I have retagged 2 riding arenas from you, see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140464357
I assume these were careless mistakes
josmougn (2023-08-27 22:13:42+00:00): Thanks, I am not very familiar with the tags for equestrian activities
Frans S (2023-09-01 13:11:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
Your mappings are rather fair.
Please do not connect nodes of buildings to each other.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Best regards
habi (2023-08-28 14:35:23+00:00): Ciao Giovannanaine

In this changeset you have added a lot of buildings tagged with `pavimentos=2`.
I suppose this means https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels

Can you change this?
Greetings from Switzerland,
habi

PS I'm here because of http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm
bkil (2023-12-07 22:14:54+00:00): A "name" címkébe kizárólag a hivatalos, kitáblázott illetve máshogy közismert elnevezés kerülhet. A változáscsomagnak sem forrásából "Esri", sem megjegyzéséből ("Pontosítások.") nem következtethető, hogy mi a forrás. Tehát?
emersonveenstra (2023-08-26 23:28:22+00:00): Hi,

All lines should have at least one tag on them, what is this supposed to be?
gscholz (2023-09-07 06:12:36+00:00): Hi Tuler,
due to your missing response I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
emersonveenstra (2023-08-26 23:27:48+00:00): Hi,

Were you trying to make this a solid stop line: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:road_marking%3Dsolid_stop_line
emersonveenstra (2023-08-26 23:26:53+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for contributing to OSM! In the future, please leave detailed changeset comments, not just "teeeeeest". Also, what are you trying to do with this relation? It doesn't appear to be documented anywhere
Jrachi (2024-10-11 15:36:11+00:00): Ciao.
In questo changeset hai cancellato 47 relazioni hiking.
Mi puoi dare una spiegazione meno laconica del commento "Nonexistent hiking route"
Ivo
totera (2024-10-12 21:32:09+00:00): Ciao Ivo, il commento sarà stato laconico ma dice tutto: di questa che sarebbe stata un'imponente rete di percorsi non esiste nulla che giustifichi un inserimento su OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route=hiking?uselang=it#Tagging_walking_and_hiking_Route_Networks):
- non è segnalata sul terreno;
- non è gestita o mantenuta da un'organizzazione ufficiale o comunque nota;
- non è patrimonio comune di conoscenza.
Ciao,
Gianluca
limes11 (2023-12-05 10:09:43+00:00): Moin, 

kannst du mal hierauf schauen:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3488089

Stehen da VZ 240 oder bloß "Fahrrad frei" an dem neuem Fuß-/Radweg?

Viele Grüße
Galbinus (2023-12-05 12:33:56+00:00): Das kann ich aus der Erinnerung nicht mit Sicherheit beantworten. Ich versuche daran zu denken, vor Ort nachzuschauen, wenn ich dort in der Nähe bin.
tonyf1 (2023-08-27 21:30:53+00:00): Hi, please read my note about relevant and unique changeset descriptions. Tony
aixbrick (2023-08-27 09:06:03+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
du hast hier maxspeed=none durch maxspeed=signals ersetzt. Für maxspeed sollte immer die zulässige Höchstgeschwindigkeit (keine = none) gesetzt werden. Wenn es variable Geschwindigkeitsanzeigen gibt, dann muss das über den Tag maxspeed:variable=yes gesetzt werden, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:maxspeed:variable. maxspeed=signals ist veraltet.
Gruß
aixbrick (2023-09-03 14:26:18+00:00): Keine Reaktion, korrigiert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140761417.
MxxCon (2023-08-27 03:25:30+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate what are you trying to map here? Sidewalks?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140432200
ConnorBikes (2023-08-27 15:49:39+00:00): Hi. My understanding is that foot=no means pedestrian access to the roadway is prohibited, which is not the case. This also doesn't match with other similar streets in Astoria/Queens/NYC.
MxxCon (2023-08-27 15:54:35+00:00): In Astoria people are allowed to walk on the roadway? 🤨
This is the first time I hear that.. 

If other streets have incorrect tags it doesn't mean wrong info should be replicated.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 06:46:12+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145277978
watmildon (2023-08-28 04:15:18+00:00): Hello! The address data feed in Rapid currently has some issues which is why these all end up as addr:city=Unincorporated. If you know the actual city address it would be great to get that patched up.

Details here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/esri-address-feed-update-has-some-issues/103132
AndersAndersson (2023-08-27 06:31:03+00:00): Hello
Why did you removed survyed information? I readded that in changeset 140437695.
avi32 (2023-08-27 00:05:28+00:00): Revert vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140432849
avi32 (2023-08-27 00:29:40+00:00): Revert vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140433107
Max Denushev (2023-08-27 07:37:48+00:00): К сожалению, ваши правки возвращают в некоторых случаях вандальные фразы
Langlaeufer (2023-08-27 20:30:37+00:00): Hallo Chalcroft,
hat das einen Grund, warum du die Fußwege inklusive den Informationen zu bicycle und surface löschst? 
Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140433633
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 06:45:16+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145277932
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-08-27 13:17:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 140451242 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fantasy edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/14984
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-08-27 13:17:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 140451242 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fantasy edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/14984
watmildon (2023-08-28 06:27:17+00:00): Hello! There has been an address data update that has some issues I'm documenting here. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/esri-address-feed-update-has-some-issues/103132

If you spot things, feel free to correct them before upload.
Xvtn (2023-12-14 19:52:40+00:00): Hi, and thanks for your contribution! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. For the surface tag on that sidewalk, I think the correct one would be concrete rather than concrete_sidewalk. I went ahead and changed that. Thanks again and welcome to OSM!
DP24PH (2023-08-27 05:23:34+00:00): Yikes! This published edit causes an ongoing conflict on our end to solve. Hopefully, such changes will be coordinated, if this involves the highway/bus route relations at the time of edit.


DP24
gscholz (2023-09-04 06:27:58+00:00): Hi Tuler,
this changeset has created errors the OSM database regarding self intersecting and overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-60.06193&lat=-3.11150&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140738908

This kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on toe maps.

Can you please fix this? You may also like to educate yourself about how to edit bus routes properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-09-06 06:03:09+00:00): Hi Tuler, 
those errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2023-09-07 06:09:13+00:00): Hi Tuler, 
due to your missing response I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-27 19:28:37+00:00): Do not map fairways and golf greens such that they partially overlap.  One feature should be fully within the other, or there should not be overlapping at all.  I have gone through and fixed it throughout this golf course.

Additionally, please use a more detailed changeset comment than "15-15" - what does that mean?  It tells me nothing.  A good changeset comment has what changed, why, etc.
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-27 19:26:03+00:00): You added all these wood areas as buildings...  Do not add features that do not exist just so it shows up for the renderer or that golf game.  I have reverted this changeset.
Warin61 (2023-08-31 00:58:56+00:00): HI,

The bus stops are in the wrong order for relation16246834  	Strathfield Connector Blue route (Cave Rd - Wallis Ave).
Warin61 (2023-09-08 01:05:53+00:00): I have placed a few in order .. but deleted many as I cannot be bothered to correct all of them.
MattWay (2024-01-09 01:31:09+00:00): Hi Crow5,

This change has undone a manual fix that was made to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1172356647
in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136045856.

MattWay
Ydgfb (2024-01-09 06:37:42+00:00): Hi thanks for letting me know, I've gone ahead and fixed it now.
i2004 (2023-08-27 14:28:04+00:00): hola corregi la linea 98
AgusQui (2023-08-28 20:44:24+00:00): Avísame cuando termines con todos los ramales
i2004 (2023-08-27 17:17:23+00:00): ya termine el ramal 116 sentido once
CoyKoi (2023-08-27 09:41:04+00:00): Hi Alwyn, the five-digit numbers starting with 5 which you saw are the IDs of the 'parent station' in the GTFS. A parent station is a grouping of multiple bus stops. So here there is a parent station "Auckland International Airport" (ID 51473) which groups multiple bus stops, including "Stop A International Airport" (stop code 2008)

The "Auckland International Airport" parent station is mapped, represented by the OSM relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15353894
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140435125
AlwynWellington (2023-08-27 16:38:34+00:00): Thanks
Today I arrive in Auckland by InterCity
Later this week I travel overseas.
AT trip planning say their buses go to a numbered stop that differs from what OSM says.  And then only when I dig deep.

My purpose was to invite local contributors to have ALL Auckland bus stops in OSM align with the number at the stop itself and with what AT says in their trip planner.

My concern (different numbers quoted for the same thing) was not just about the stops at AIA

Kia kaha
❤️‍🔥 (2023-09-05 05:01:01+00:00): i can confirm that the signage at the airport uses the 4-digit codes: https://westnordost.de/p/172643.jpg
muralito (2023-08-29 01:48:10+00:00): Hola. No de dejes confundir por las malas traducciones o traducciones directas. parking=street_side es otra cosa en OSM. esto seria "parking=surface"
UYMapper (2023-09-14 06:10:28+00:00): Tenés razón, ya lo corregí.
b-holdet (2023-08-28 10:17:07+00:00): Hvilken ide er baggrunden for at du lægger historik af websider og butiksnavne på POI? Det ligger allerede implicit i historikken i OSM.
b-holdet (2023-08-30 19:54:26+00:00): Mens du er i gang med at lægge historik ind, så kan du lige se på denne liste fra CVR på dette sted. Der sikkert noget du kan bruge:

https://datacvr.virk.dk/soegeresultater?fritekst=Herlev%2520Hovedgade%2520102%25202730%2520Herlev&sideIndex=1&size=10
mueschel (2023-08-29 17:19:33+00:00): Hi,
could you check the tags you added here? It's quite uncommon to add a "_2" at the end of a tag. If it's really necessary to have two source:url tags, it's better to use the much more common "source:url:2" with a colon.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-30 02:34:30+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140565943
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-30 02:33:36+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140565936
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-30 02:32:40+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140565921
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-30 02:31:53+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140565911