piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
matt_ellery (2024-12-19 21:09:42+00:00): Hi ljones56,

Unless something has changed, Carfax has a No Entry sign for southbound traffic (except cycles): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=131534852351315&focus=photo&lat=51.062524961300284&lng=-0.3281082310751344&z=16.852768485179972&x=0.47516744226960833&y=0.5942209067282249&zoom=2.5686695278969953

And I believe East Street also has a No Entry sign going east from Market Square. Are you sure these aren't one way?
user_21572887 (2024-12-20 00:14:09+00:00): Those are no entry signs for vehicular traffic as those sections of Carfax and East Street are for pedestrians and cycles only. A sign indicating one way traffic is an upward arrow on a blue background. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-highway-code/traffic-signs
rskedgell (2025-08-19 17:11:53+00:00): I see that you added layer=-2 to the sidewalk of Jermyn Street / Duke Street St James. It seem unlikely that it is actually subterranean, so I am guessing that you used Rabid's helpfult feature to let you hide a potential problem with a highway-building intersection. Please either fix the problem or ignore it rather than adding fake layer=* tags.
eggie (2024-12-18 21:20:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Alle begin is moeilijk Dat is een voordeel als je ergens bekend bent, maar je edits moet wel kloppen. 
Die oneway=yes over dat lange stuk klopte niet, maar wel bij de aansluiting van de rotonde. Dus nu klopt het daar niet. 
Nu liggen er twee wegen op elkaar geplakt. E;en met oneway=yes en één met oneway=no?
Moped=yes hoef je niet toe te voegen aan reguliere wegen. Dat is allemaal default. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160368644
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-12-18 21:24:53+00:00): Ik draai even wat teru.. Er is te veek verkeer gegaan.
reverted by #160369337
eggie (2024-12-18 21:28:48+00:00): Ik heb het juiste stuk van oneway=yes ontdaan. Dat kleine stukje op de rotonde is een bromfietsdoorsteek. Dat was goed getagd. 
moped=yes hoort niet getagd te worden op wegen. 
Het is nu weer routeerbaar.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-01-05 13:33:22+00:00): Ik heb het teruggedraaid en daarna aangepast omdat dat minder werk was om het verder aan te passen.
Dat oneway no hoorde maar te lopen tot de splitsing.
Het was inderdaad verkeerd getagd door de voorgaande mapper. Die was vergeten te splitsen .
Al die straten met moped=yes waren dan in 1x van een defaulttag ontdaan. 
De bromfietsdoorsteek was door de voorgaande mapper als highway=path getagd. Dat zie je wel meer om dat probleem van een fietspad met fietsverbod te ontlopen.
Met een fietspad moped=designated en zonder bicycle=no is niks mis. Je zou er zelfs nog over mogen fietsen als je maar niet de rotonde opgaat. Fietsers horen op het fietspad te blijven.
Volgens mij klopt het nu allemaal. 

Wegen duiden die scooterfriendly zijn is niet de bedoeling.
Wel kun je G12a bromfietspaden van de juiste tags voorzien.

Die worden dan op  bv de Openfietsmap breder weergegeven. Die tagging ontbreek vaak nog.
Juiste tagging fietspaden:

G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway


en dit is ook een handige voor jou om die paden op te sporen.

https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=52.670263636&lng=4.814516902&z=18

Mapse
eggie
matt_ellery (2024-12-19 21:13:12+00:00): There's no need to add details to the old Currys and Office Outlet building as they have been demolished. I'll revert this change.
eggie (2024-12-20 15:48:03+00:00): Hoi,
Hier heb ik alleen het gedeelte dat door het gebouw loopt tunnel=building_passage gelaten. De stukken buiten het gebouw heb ik er van ontdaan.
Groet
eggie
SekeRob (2024-12-21 10:55:45+00:00): Hi,

Your boundary=disused is being flagged by QA. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18438206
Think you need to change the tag per lifecycle methodology to disused:boundary=administrative , Thetag disused:boundary used near 6000 times per taginfo: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=disused%3Aboundary opposed to boundarY0disused just 100,

cheers
DabMK (2024-12-25 21:57:23+00:00): Thx! Then what should I use as "boundary"? Nothing?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 20:48:56+00:00): Hello!

You used
bicycle_parking=lockersv
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12396297349/history

Have you maybe meant
bicycle_parking=lockers
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Tolhuis (2025-04-28 21:34:12+00:00): Hi Mateusz, thanks for reporting. It was indeed a typo.
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-18 22:22:01+00:00): Except that sidewalk exists.  Keep in mind that OpenStreetMap is a live map of the world.  If you're looking to make a customized map, you might take a look at the tools available from Mapbox or other alternatives listed on wiki.openstreetmap.org
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160369435
L'imaginaire (2024-12-29 13:48:06+00:00): Ik kan dit bevestigen: op basis van survey geen reden om hier toegangsbeperkingen op te zetten. Geen bordjes aan begin of eind van pad.
felipeeugenio (2024-12-25 13:11:15+00:00): Hola. Tienes una fuente de esto? porque en el chat de la comunidad enviaron evidencia de que si. Quizas sería bueno que te incorporaras en el link https://t.me/OSMcl
felipeeugenio (2024-12-25 13:14:45+00:00): dejado como estaba antes. Acabo de ver que revirtieron el cambio.
saludos
Daemon Targaryen (2024-12-25 14:03:18+00:00): Hola buenos días, el nuevo concejo de Ñuñoa suspendió el cambio hace 1 semana (https://www.biobiochile.cl/noticias/nacional/region-metropolitana/2024/12/18/concejo-municipal-de-nunoa-frena-cambio-de-nombre-a-calle-republica-de-israel-consultaran-a-vecinos.shtml).
¡Saludos!
felipeeugenio (2024-12-25 14:43:11+00:00): Si. Vi. Lo dejé como debe estar. Gracias.
Timmy_Tesseract (2025-04-03 10:57:46+00:00): Hey there. 

According to the wiki railway=abandoned should only be used if "the route is still visible with ties/sleepers, signals or other railroad right of way signs or infrastructure". No such physical signs seem to remain for the former rails in Bamban. Most of the right-of-way has either been replaced with streets or is covered with buildings.

At most some secondary recognisable traces like earthworks are visible which would match the wiki description of railway=razed.
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-18 22:03:37+00:00): Please don't add features where they don't exist.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160370307
felipeeugenio (2024-12-19 13:05:08+00:00): Hello. Please don´t use generic names. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names)
Regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160370540
Syl (2024-12-19 06:12:57+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre contribution.
J'ai annulé le déplacement de chemins sur Saint-Étienne qui avait l'air d'être une erreur.
Tomek_Koz (2025-01-02 12:24:27+00:00): Hi Joseph,
I see your change on this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507231986 which is attributed as access=private. Was this change intentional?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-01-02 13:19:40+00:00): Access=private tag was added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105234265
See https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/250656452
Tomek_Koz (2025-01-02 13:39:29+00:00): And then this small stretch of highway was upgraded to motorway, which should not be the case for private highway, should it?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-01-02 13:50:23+00:00): idk
Joseph R P (2025-01-02 15:54:02+00:00): The link was not changed to motorway, but rather a motorway link, since it's a median break of the highway rather than a part of the service lot itself. Motorways and motorway links alike can be tagged with access=private granted that the tagging scheme reflects both the physical construction of the roadway and the access.
Tomek_Koz (2025-01-03 07:30:35+00:00): Hi Joseph, thank You for confirmation, that is the answer I was looking for!
Branko Kokanovic (2024-12-19 07:13:00+00:00): što disused? Sad je upravo prošao tramvaj 9 pored mene? Treba mu samo promeniti geometriju i možda ga preimenovati u 9L (mada na tramvajima i dalje piše 9)
Srdjan023 (2024-12-25 11:47:32+00:00): Па мислим не може трамвај да пролази кроз преко моста кога руше. Сад ако постоји нека друга линија 9 или 7 онда додај нову релацију по новој путањи али ова релација остаје јер ће линија бити враћена кад се мост нови мост заврши (ако уопште сруше стари).
Srdjan023 (2024-12-25 11:48:45+00:00): Било би лепо када би господа из Секретаријата за јавни превоз дала ГТФС податке па да можемо да ажурирамо мапу.
Branko Kokanovic (2024-12-25 13:09:17+00:00): Linije 7 i 9 postoje: https://bgprevoz.rs/linije/aktuelne-izmene/617 
Idu drugom trasom, ali postoje, kao kad bi bilo koji autobus promenio trasu. Ja bih ove linije vratio "u rad" i samo im promenio trasu - em odgovara realnosti, em čuva istoriju relacije.
Branko Kokanovic (2024-12-25 13:10:29+00:00): druga opcija je da napravim novu relaciju 7L i 9L? Mada na tramvajima ne piše to "L" (svaki dan sam tu)
Srdjan023 (2024-12-25 13:33:14+00:00): Па мислим да ти боље знаш. Ја бих ставио Л можда само нису још ставили на трамваје али како ти хоћеш. Свакако у оба случаја бих направио нову релацију
Branko Kokanovic (2025-01-21 19:58:09+00:00): Samo da javim da sam dodao 7L i 9L (nisam dirao 7 i 9)
AndyB_66 (2024-12-19 07:18:51+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
MapSpot (2024-12-19 14:34:53+00:00): Hi CrysMelyn,

I notice you're using the tag private=yes to denote road and trials that are not publicly accessible.

In the future, to avoid routing issues, I highly recommend using the more globally standard tag access=private, which is compatible with most navigators and map visualization platforms. See more info on the private=* tag below.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:private
CrysMelyn (2025-01-13 13:39:36+00:00): Thanks for the reminder :)
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-21 02:13:22+00:00): This changeset removed the highway tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/879560800
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160372568
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
notmyproblem1 (2025-04-28 20:25:52+00:00): Dear wildmaps, may you please remove any nodes for the area in Aulla? That's duplicated (check https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10836812199/history)

Thanks, If you want to, or I will :))
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Rayman 1 (2024-12-19 00:26:36+00:00): Edit: meant "renovations"
ivanbranco (2024-12-19 00:29:02+00:00): Cosa succede? Prima cambi operator E-distribuzione → E-Distribuzione S.p.A., poi da E-Distribuzione S.p.A. → e-distribuzione S.p.A., poi e-distribuzione S.p.A. → Terna e ora Terna → Terna S.p.A.
Queste modifiche automatiche in tutta Italia sono state discusse con la comunità Italiana?

Ci sono delle linee guide da seguire, che servono anche ad evitare questi pasticci: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct#Document_and_discuss_your_plans
wildmaps (2024-12-19 00:47:29+00:00): Ciao,
le modifiche che ho effettuato sono state discusse con la comunità Italiana verso la fine di ottobre.

L'obiettivo principale era uniformare i valori del tag operator, poiché c'erano molte varianti di "e-distribuzione S.p.A." scritte in modo diverso. Inizialmente avevo assegnato "E-Distribuzione S.p.A." a tutti i casi, ma poi ho scelto di utilizzare il nome ufficiale riportato nei crediti della pagina ufficiale dell'operatore.

Per quanto riguarda le linee ad alta tensione (quelle da 132 kV), ho corretto l'attribuzione del tag operator, sostituendo "e-distribuzione" con "Terna", che è il gestore corretto.

Ho consultato la wiki, ma non ho trovato indicazioni chiare sull'utilizzo della forma legale (S.p.A.) nei tag. Puoi confermare come andrebbe gestito questo?

Se hai notato errori nel processo di queste modifiche o hai suggerimenti fammi sapere e faccio un revert.
Danysan95 (2026-01-04 10:04:19+00:00): Dopo questa modifica su https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1095235502 e https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/163951011 sono presenti sia not:operator:wikidata=Q936325 che operator:wikidata=Q936325 ; credo che su questi due elementi vada rimosso l'operator
wildmaps (2026-01-04 10:25:58+00:00): Tolto not:operator siccome l'operator è Terna (Rondissone - Albertville).
eggie (2024-12-19 06:46:40+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sportparken-en-name-tags/3904
eggie (2024-12-19 06:48:39+00:00): Hoi.. Kijk even in de discussie op het forum hoe sportvelden te taggen.
Mvg..
eggie
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:29:46+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659769
AndyB_66 (2024-12-19 07:18:21+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
AndyB_66 (2024-12-19 07:18:15+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
AndyB_66 (2024-12-19 07:18:09+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
RoadGum (2024-12-24 17:28:31+00:00): Why bounding box large
John Hanover (2024-12-19 02:47:45+00:00): https://wilderness.net/visit-wilderness/?ID=454
Kovoschiz (2024-12-19 10:56:40+00:00): Please don't make these https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations_are_not_categories
`brand=` is already enough. `=college` , `=university` , and `=school` , etc, should be interpreted as campuses, not a "school".
Kovoschiz (2024-12-19 10:57:24+00:00): And use `brand:wikidata=`
rivermont (2025-01-06 23:17:02+00:00): Be careful when clicking around in RapiD. You somehow added a node to way 1300758334 which caused it to cross itself, breaking the Lake Hartwell relation (142716). You can see it visualized here: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1300758334

I have fixed it in changeset #161077773
itsamap! (2025-01-07 15:14:47+00:00): Thanks for catching that. I must have dragged something when adding sidewalks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-04-22 22:20:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 181693288 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20171
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-04-22 22:20:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 181693288 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20171
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-04-22 22:20:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 181693288 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20171
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-04-22 22:20:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 181693288 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20171
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-04-22 22:20:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 181693288 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20171
MapSpot (2024-12-19 14:47:42+00:00): Hi Ilovemap1999,

My apologies if I'd made some errors in my previous changeset, the assumption of access=private is that only authorized entrants and staff can access a road, while access=no implies that the road is completely inaccessible at the current time to everyone.

I notice some roads are tagged with access=no + private=yes. What is meant by this?

Note that private=yes is not compatible with routers and renderers and is considered a tagging error. This tag should either be removed, replaced with access=private (if the roadway is privately accessible to staff), or replaced with ownership=private (if the roadway is privately owned).
MapSpot (2024-12-19 14:47:58+00:00): For more information on use of the private=* tag, see below.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:private
Sd5605 (2025-11-30 00:49:32+00:00): government的值不能填「國軍退除役官兵輔導委員會」。
ZeLonewolf (2024-12-19 03:38:54+00:00): Intended changeset description was to update the Jennings boundary and conflate it to the FL/GA boundary
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 19:03:51+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160407094
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:24:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Udarian (2024-12-19 04:32:40+00:00): at TPA
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 19:03:52+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160407094
citrula (2024-12-23 08:16:57+00:00): Hello, in this edit you dragged the highway feeder/service road - please be careful and review the edits you make before you upload them.

Also, please map the ALPRs at the physical location (i.e. on the shoulder) , rather than on the highway way itself.

I have reverted this changeset - let me know if you have any questions.
Kovoschiz (2024-12-19 10:29:57+00:00): As mentioned before, please only edit names. The high point still exists.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:10:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 18:52:41+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160406813
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:29:47+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659769
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 18:52:42+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160406813
AndyB_66 (2024-12-19 07:19:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
vtrtsxlegend (2024-12-20 15:48:21+00:00): Hi Baloo Uriza, thank you for making us aware of placement tags. We will make sure to take them into account in future edits to prevent similar situations that caused you to revert the changeset.
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 18:52:43+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160406813
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 18:52:44+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160406813
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 18:43:47+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160406546
mavl (2025-05-13 15:08:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 18:00:15+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160405271
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 17:55:43+00:00): Removing extraneous and fictional kink.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement#Examples for how placement=* ways are mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160405111