piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Pan Perníček (2025-03-11 10:55:03+00:00): Hello, 
#Mapycz user confirms trail (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318386011) is opened, please verify. https://ifcn.madeira.gov.pt/pt/atividades-de-natureza/percursos-pedestres-recomendados/percursos-pedestres-recomendados.html
DaveF (2024-09-05 08:49:09+00:00): Please provide evidence vehicles are permitted on Elizabeth Parade.
lgladdy (2024-09-05 08:59:06+00:00): It's clearly a segregated private residential road. There is parking spaces provided by the steps north east of Highgate for staff of Coffee #1 which wouldn't be accessible if vehicles were prohibited, and access to the homes on Elizabeth Parade wouldn't be possible if vehicles were prohibited. There are no signs to display any kind of restriction for vehicles, and the whole of Elizabeth parade is clearly split with different paving slabs to indicate a walking area/footpath. The entrance to Leaded Terrace and Percy Terrace signs also state "leading to Elizabeth Parade".

It's only usable for access, or from connecting from Percy Terrace to Longmead Terrace or the opposite.
JassKurn (2024-09-05 15:03:16+00:00): Hi lgladdy,

Just randomly seen this changeset discussion while looking at a changeset discussion webpage

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions?c=United%20Kingdom#5/55.058/-0.119

My instinct is that the Elizabeth Parade "footway" to the east, is way that allows access for bicycles (pedal cycles). 

OSM tag, highway=footway, is considered by default to mean bicycle=no . I suspect this is not the case here.
lgladdy (2024-09-05 15:11:30+00:00): Hey JassKurn,

Yeh, that’s true. The parts I’ve made “resident road” are a wide paved “road” with both vehicle, cycle, bike and foot traffic. It’s low traffic, but i think highlighting that it’s possible for vehicles to travel from Percy Terrace to Longmead Terrace is worthwhile. You can see on other mapping services that it’s classed as a road - but maybe there is a better classification which shows that it’s accessible to all forms of transport rather than residential road?

Regarding the east part being a footway, i’d definitely agree it should be clear that both the east and west “connections” to Victoria Bridge Road and Midland Road respectively do support bicycle access. It’s also regularly used by mopeds, which may not be intended but there are no signs suggesting otherwise.
frosm (2024-09-12 10:11:32+00:00): n'hésitez pas à renseigner les 3 activités par 3 objets différents avec le site web sur l'objet dédié car il n'y a probablement aucun outil qui gère le fait de trouver l'une d'elle en description
CAM-Gerlach (2024-09-07 22:23:50+00:00): Hi Philip, and welcome (back) to OpenStreetMap!

Given you've presumably verified this business has closed, overall the change looks good. However, make sure to remove other tagging specific to the closed business—for example, `brand` was removed, but `brand:wikidata` was not. You can also remove `amenity`, `cuisine`, `diet:vegetarian`, `opening_hours` and (possibly) `phone`, as they no longer make sense given the POI they describe is no longer here.

One other note—instead of deleting the `name` entirely, you can also move it to `old_name`, which may be useful for both future mappers and map consumers to understand the history of the place.

Thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156195324
longbee (2024-09-05 14:48:47+00:00): Looks good!
BCNorwich (2024-09-06 06:45:52+00:00): Hi, I've removed two highways that you placed on top of existing highways, Way: 1313007960 and Way: 1313007939.  This duplication disrupts routing.

Regards Bernard
ratrun (2024-09-07 05:17:16+00:00): Thanks, it seems I overlooked some, probably because of the amount of the problems in this area.
GerdP (2024-11-18 11:28:53+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Ist der Tunnel unter der K140 wirklich so lang? https://www.osm.org/way/1041761317
kitsee (2024-09-04 17:31:33+00:00): this reverts changeset 56146484
eggie (2024-09-04 18:38:19+00:00): Top!
RicoElectrico (2024-10-13 22:48:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4226662 to chyba rozwiązuje tę uwagę?
eggie (2024-09-04 18:34:12+00:00): Dag Gerwin,

Wanneer hier gebouwd wordt is de specificatie niet =house , maar construction=residential.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-04 18:36:06+00:00): aangepast naar residential
eggie (2024-09-04 19:10:53+00:00): Wanneer het geen woonwijk wordt maar uitbreiding van het bedrijventerrein wellicht construction = industrial
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.20673,5.463129,18/?datastrip=20240901_PNEO-04
eggie (2024-09-04 19:12:00+00:00): Ahh, maar het wordt een woonwijkje begrijp ik.
rskedgell (2024-09-04 23:49:18+00:00): How can a highway=cycleway have a prohibition for bicycles?

Has the toucan crossing here been replaced with another crossing type, and if so, what?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4860857576

Have these signs been removed and replaced?
https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=51.532102%7E0.003973&lvl=20.2&mo=om.1&pi=-0.2&style=x&dir=347.5
https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/rskedgell?lat=51.4779829&lng=-0.0180406&z=18.20477552230186&pKey=1134111453754457&focus=photo
Blench1 (2024-09-05 07:39:13+00:00): I tried riding this path yesterday and I couldn't because this path Has been cordoned off. It has been like this for nearly a year, with no sign of being restored anytime soon, which is why I proposed the change. The crossing is still there but is working as just a pedestrian crossing.
rskedgell (2024-09-05 08:13:44+00:00): I see. If it's closed to pedestrians as well and the closure looks like it will be long term, there are several ways you could do this.

1) Set access=no and remove the foot and bicycle tags

2) Change it to highway=construction + construction=cycleway

3) Use the disused:* lifecycle prefix, changing highway=cycleway to disused:highway=cycleway

Option 2 has the advantage that StreetComplete will periodically prompt users to check whether it has reopened.

Whichever you use, it is worth adding a note tag briefly describing the situation and a check_date tag.
jeslop (2024-09-06 11:00:44+00:00): Hola Camiñante Alberich, bienvenido a OSM. Dos cosas: para un depósito de agua prueba con esta etiqueta: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made=reservoir_covered y lo snombres nunca deben ser descripciones, esto es un depósito de agua, no se llama así: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Nombre_es_solo_el_nombre
Si tienes más dudas puedes contactar con el grupo de Galicia en Telegram(https://t.me/osmgalicia) o el canal oficial nacional en https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51

Saludos,

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

Saludos
george1201 (2024-09-15 21:49:19+00:00): Hallo BlumenRau,
dass der Laden s'Pflänzle in Langensteinbach jetzt einen neuen Namen trägt, habe ich im Vorbeifahren gesehen. Hier in Busenbach war ich nicht vor Ort, kann also über die Historie des Gebäudes Schulstraße 6 nichts sagen. Allerdings kann ich mir nicht vorstellen, dass der Umzug so radikal war, dass auch das Gebäude hier dem Erdboden gleichgemacht wurde. Es wurde nämlich von dir gelöscht. Ich gehe mal davon aus, dass dies nur ein Versehen war. Ich habe die Gebäudedaten deswegen wiederhergestellt. Die Geometrie habe ich beibehalten, so wie sie vor deiner Änderung waren. Wenn man sich das Luftbild anschaut, kann man vermuten, dass man diese noch verbessern kann. Aber das soll jemand machen, der es sich vor Ort angesehen hat.

PS: Du kannst sicher was zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1336865681 in Langensteinbach sagen. Zwei Blumengeschäfte nebeneinander? Da stimmt doch sicher was nicht.
eggie (2024-09-04 18:30:50+00:00): Hi.. No space is okay, but I merged the info with the present addressnode.
Greetz,
eggie
lipuma (2024-09-04 18:49:48+00:00): Haha, speelspul. Soms vind ik het ook leuk om speelspul aan speeltuintjes toe te voegen.
Colbertson (2024-09-05 11:58:15+00:00): Hey, have you considered doing your abandoned railway mapping on https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ ?
Itd be nice to not have things that no longer exist in OSM.
HellMap (2024-09-06 18:41:07+00:00): Yes, please map what is on the ground. If there are any visible traces that a road or track or something were a railway, then it's fine to add former railway tags. But if there is absolutely nothing on the ground, then there should not be any tagged features, for example over completely rebuilt areas, intersections and such. You can add an empty line for a historic railway relation for railways that still have visible elements somewhere else, but the line itself should not specify any tags.
richlv (2024-09-10 19:09:25+00:00): The relation in question was deleted with a comment "Some people state that this information is useless in OSM. Sorry for all cyclists who plan bicycle tours along old railway tracks".

That does not seem correct - if there is a cycling route (and thus paths, tracks etc), that is highly welcome and there are plenty of such cases mapped in Latvia.
Just that they certainly aren't route=railway.
HellMap (2024-09-11 09:00:57+00:00): This also doesn't only apply to this particular changeset, but all of them. There is no problem mapping route relations if they have some sort of identifiable remains. The problem is all the sections that don't exist on the ground that are mapped as real features, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/935480741 that just goes across fields, highways, properties, forests. These ways should not be mapped as railway=*. OSM only maps what is on the ground and these don't exist in any identifiable form in most of the places. An untagged way with relation would be fine.

And routes like this are not directly bikable, so I don't understand the argument here. A handicapped person could certainly never use any of these. Even the "best" example as mentioned below has sections where you have to take detours difficult even when biking, let alone if mobility is impaired.

And as rich says, there are plenty of cycle routes along former railway infrastructure where it is actually possible and restored/repaved ones are called Greenways, for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11003258. And yes, you can map something like historic https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18002788 here. And there are examples like this where it would match closely. But these are the minority.
WWMapper101 (2024-09-05 12:36:00+00:00): Hej,

Du menar alltså att busshållplatser INTE ska taggas med public_transport=platform? Isåfall kunde du säga det på ett vänligt sätt i ett meddelande till mig istället för att konstant radera taggen bara för att jag ska lägga till den igen. Faktum är att jag annars bara kommer fortsätta att lägga till den igen efter att du raderar den
Snusmumriken (2024-09-05 12:44:17+00:00): Precis, lägg INTE till public_transport=platform eller bus=yes.

Detta kommunicerade jag till dig i detta changeset meddelande
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156174945
eggie (2024-09-04 19:05:07+00:00): Hi _DomL

Better not changing the addressnodes.. even if it looks nicer.

https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Harteveldlaan+1a&objectId=1783200000045405&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=77059.5165&geometry.y=447491.384&zoomlevel=15
The import was with a capital letter. 

The reason has to do with  periodically updating the data. 

Greetz,
eggie
_DomL (2024-09-04 21:14:42+00:00): I do not understand what that means. 
What is changing the addressnodes?
eggie (2024-09-05 05:35:56+00:00): 1A》1a
MichS (2024-09-16 10:49:06+00:00): Hallo,

tracktype wird üblicherweise bei Feld- und Waldwegen angegeben. Hier Wohnstraße.  Es ist möglich surface, smoothness anzugeben. 

MFG
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-08 10:28:40+00:00): Czemu usuwasz to jako zbędne?
pavvv (2024-10-08 10:44:38+00:00): Ponieważ są to domyślne restrykcje.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier=bollard
grzegorz75jan (2024-10-08 12:18:50+00:00): Pamiętam tą dyskusję z Discorda
grzegorz75jan (2024-10-08 17:23:28+00:00): Zabawne. To była ta dyskusja https://discord.com/channels/783754873861963786/783766269707026483/1280579472726167606 i jej uczestnicy :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-08 18:24:06+00:00): Jest różnica między "to jest domyślne i typowe" a "potwierdzone że takie jest w tym konkretnym przypadku"
silversurfer83 (2024-09-05 19:16:55+00:00): Hi Nathan,

I see you're currently pretty busy "updating tags". SInce is starts to look like large scale edits (spread over many small edits) I'd currently just like to know why you remove "playground:theme=playground"?

My reason for adding this: In Germany I have a rough picture in my head when I hear "simple playground". So when I add "playground" as theme that means it's a simple playground. Removing the tag altogether leaves it open to guesswork what this place looks like.

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156201287
silversurfer83 (2024-09-19 08:33:50+00:00): Hi there

Any reason why you would remove that tag?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 06:43:02+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12156206768/history has shop = bottled_water that was added in this edit
shop=bottled_water ? Is there some reason to not use more common shop=water ?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=water

Probably some extra tag can be added to express it sells bottled water, maybe water=bottled_water
sis651 (2026-02-04 17:53:38+00:00): @Mateusz Konieczny

Hi! Actually, the reason is I didn't know which tag to use to tag it and that was the tag I remembered at the moment of mapping. They basically sell 5lt, 10lt, 19lt of water bottles. shop=water can be used too, I didn't know good enough about that tag.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-16 12:14:55+00:00): changed!
GerdP (2024-09-09 05:28:13+00:00): Moin!
Du hast bei den Wegen um den Kreisel in Bruchhausen-Vilsen das oneway=yes zu no gemacht. Ich habe mich hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156187479 vom Kollegen überzeugen lassen, dass man da wahrscheinlich mit dem Rad fahren darf, aber wie kommst Du drauf, dass das in beide Richtungen geht? Wenn dem so wäre, dann könnte man die Radrouten wie 5-99 https://www.osm.org/relation/17972645 deutlich vereinfachen.
GerdP (2024-09-09 18:13:52+00:00): Hatte heute Glück und mir kam genau am Kreisel ein Polizeiauto entgegen. Habe die Polizisten gefragt und die sind auch der Meinung, dass man um den Kreisel rum radeln darf, aber nur in der gleichen Richtung wie die Autos.
GerdP (2024-09-11 07:52:28+00:00): Ich habe wieder oneway=yes gesetzt. Bei dieser Abbiegebeschränkung https://www.osm.org/relation/18008090 fehlt noch der "via" Knoten. Ich könnte den einfach setzen, aber auf meinen Fotos finde ich nirgendwo einen Hinweis, dass man dort nicht abbiegen darf. Habe allerdings bisher auch nicht drauf geachtet.
BB-plan (2024-09-15 11:55:27+00:00): Hallo,
ich bin dort, bis vor kurzem, wirklich etliche Male auf dem Weg nach Hoya zu Bekannten durchgefahren und habe mir damals auch ein Video vom Platz und dem angrenzenden Einmündungsbereich hinter der Bahn gemacht. Leider hab' ich das aus Platzgründen gelöscht, aber ich kann mich noch gut erinnern, dass dort ein Zebra-Streifen und ein weiterer Streifen Radweg-Querung an zumindest einer Zufahrtstraße existiert.
Also mein Eindruck war, dass Radbenutzung allein aus dieser Tatsache definitiv erlaubt ist.

Die Wegnahme der Fahrtrichtungsbeschränkung war wohl ein Flüchtigkeitsfehler. An eine Freigabe in beide Richtungen kann ich mich auch nicht erinnern. Die sind ja auch sehr selten.
Wenn ich dort wieder lang komme, werde ich noch mal explizit schauen.

Aber Radbenutzung dort sehe ich ganz klar in der Nachschau so. möglich.
NeisBot (2024-09-04 19:26:38+00:00): Hi Sheikh Salah, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 6 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=156201765
Sheikh Salah (2024-09-07 17:56:39+00:00): Hello mr. bot
I have removed 6 ways ive uploded earlier, then replaced them in more updated, accurate versions.
pitscheplatsch (2024-09-09 07:17:04+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156026032
directioninfinite (2024-09-10 09:23:19+00:00): Czy można prosić o podanie źródła nazw (source) tych ulic?
kasztelan111 (2024-09-12 20:25:50+00:00): Uchwały Rady m. st. Warszawy:
- Uchwała nr IX/257/2024 z 2024-08-29
- Uchwała nr IX/259/2024 z 2024-08-29
- Uchwała nr IX/255/2024 z 2024-08-29
- Uchwała nr IX/256/2024 z 2024-08-29
- Uchwała nr IX/258/2024 z 2024-08-29
directioninfinite (2024-09-13 11:37:47+00:00): Dziękuję bardzo! Nauczyłem się czegoś nowego
map-maker-pro (2025-02-27 11:59:44+00:00): Hi! Thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156201789
eggie (2024-09-04 19:50:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
schoschi (2024-09-04 21:09:51+00:00): Danke fürs Hinzufügen :-)
eggie (2024-09-04 19:49:18+00:00): Dag DorD  Svp geen landuse vastplakken aan de paden.
Ik heb het weer losgemaakt.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-04 20:04:31+00:00): Als voorbeeld die parkeerplaatsen toegevoegd
eggie (2024-09-04 19:55:39+00:00): Weg op parkeerplaats weer hersteld. Philipp Nicolastraat is gedeeltelijk service.. Geen pedestrian. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2024-09-05 15:05:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Dawid2849 (2025-11-09 15:23:12+00:00): W OSM nie mapujemy historii, od tego jest OpenHistoricalMap.
mau59 (2024-09-04 19:51:36+00:00): It was actually "Miscellaneous edits in Pisa, Tuscany, Italy", sorry
David Osipov (2024-09-21 17:31:30+00:00): Great job! Magari xar!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156202701
eggie (2024-09-05 06:50:13+00:00): Dag TCC,

De enige foutmelding die ik nog zie is een node met name=De Smaragd zonder verder shop= of office=?

Wellicht dat jij het weet of dat object nog bestaat.
Ik draai gewoon de validator van JOSM. .. vandaar.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-05 06:55:45+00:00): De Smaragd zit in het gebouw waar ook de HEMA zit.. ongeveer in het midden.
Het was een bijdrage uit 2014
TheCornCollector (2024-09-05 10:52:47+00:00): “De Smaragd” is de naam van het gebouw zelf. Van wat ik lees is het een gebouw met een bijzondere architectuurstijl. https://www.visitalmere.com/nl/locaties/3277377295/smaragd
eggie (2024-09-05 11:29:48+00:00): Ah... dan kan die naam gewoon op de gebouwomtrek.
Evt met gegevens over de atchitect. De node kan dan weg.
Gr eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-11 02:54:27+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1313338249/history has KS = 2 that was added in this edit
What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?
Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Or maybe this key can and should be documented as useful tagging schema?
Roggiii (2025-12-11 07:41:13+00:00): I added the path surface via street complete, not sure if it did the KS Tag automatically somehow? I did not mean to include it.
Can be deleted i think.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-08 06:49:57+00:00): hmm, maybe you split an existing path...

it seems to have happened, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230962543/history

sorry for bothering you
Roggiii (2026-07-14 12:09:44+00:00): ah yeah it is included in all the paths... but no clue to what it means
wombatmaper (2024-09-04 20:17:37+00:00): See discussion here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/automatic-fixing-of-yes-to-yes-on-diet-vegan-and-diet-vegetarian/118329/12
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-02 10:03:43+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45749440/history has maxspeed:source = sign that was added in this edit
is it intentionally used instead of source:maxspeed=sign ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Asource%3Amaxspeed%3Dsign

maxspeed:type is also sometimes used as a key for such data, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:type
mtmail (2025-12-02 10:10:36+00:00): That was added in the previous changeset. My changeset only fixed the typo in the tag name. I see you already opened a discussion in the previous changeset, too.
FUZZY_42 (2024-11-03 16:41:41+00:00): Не надо в name;en добавлять дословный перевод на Английский название административной единицы и адресса. Откатил.
VLD280 (2024-11-05 20:15:28+00:00): Hello Fuzzy_42, 

Thanks for the update. We will keep this in mind for future edits.

Best regards,
VLD280
Eslam_Elsayed (2024-09-05 11:06:31+00:00): Hello, pidugu konda reddy;
I noticed you reverted my edit and changed the value of the oneway tag from "yes" to "-1"
Example: https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/557409331
and added "oneway=-1" to some streets
For Example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33903981
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/652131228
Please keep in mind that when you added the oneway tag It better be (yes), and you can check the OpenStreetMap wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway=-1
Regards
Eslam_Elsayed
pidugu konda reddy (2024-09-09 06:51:40+00:00): Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. 
Thank you
Eslam_Elsayed (2024-09-09 13:41:08+00:00): Thank you for your kind words, and happy mapping!
silversurfer83 (2024-09-05 15:24:02+00:00): Moin :)

ich hab mal mit die lifecycle prefixes und entsprechenden Haupttags angepasst, damit das zu deiner Beschreibung passt. "barrier=block" ist auch ein Haupttag und sollte an ein eigenes OSM-Objekt getaggt werdenm da du hier gerade einen SEHR großen Block erzeugt hattest. Hab das mal entfernt und du weißt ja sicher, wo die eigentliche Barriere ist. DIese gehört dann als node auf den Weg, den sie versperrt.

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156204062
ForestFurnace (2024-09-04 20:57:01+00:00): Tioga County, PA: Blossburg's borough ordinances do mention that brown signs are for private roads.
https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/blossburgbor/latest/blossburgbor_pa/0-0-0-394
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-04 21:00:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12156344805
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/295232358

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
0xb7767000 (2024-09-05 07:15:47+00:00): Danke für's vorbeischauen und anpassen!
puma515 (2024-09-05 11:51:20+00:00): Gerne :-)
gscscnd (2024-09-05 05:22:29+00:00): Przy odpowiednich oneway relacje restriction są zbędne. Poprawione: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156212832
rskedgell (2024-09-04 23:36:16+00:00): How will these benefit pedestrian routing, as they don't connect via crossings?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
rskedgell (2024-09-05 06:34:03+00:00): Apologies, I see that you added the crossings in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156206389

If you could also update the tags on the parent street from sidewalk=both to sidewalk:both=separate that also gives hints to data consumers.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_separate_way
rskedgell (2024-09-18 10:04:00+00:00): Please don't add tag for the router/renderer.

As someone who actually lives in East London and uses OSM-based pedestrian routing software, armchair mappers adding decorative sidewalks and pretend crossings is unhelpful.