piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Legras_TT (2026-07-21 03:20:37+00:00): Thanks a lot for fixing up those buildings. I'll advise the competition organisers to award you a "Green Card". I think the other mapper has also improved their contributions based on your advice. Cheers - Peter
FajrAl (2026-07-21 07:47:32+00:00): Thanks, Peter! I really appreciate the encouragement!
Flynn Marquardt (2026-07-18 06:06:04+00:00): Fix borders relation/6257747 and relation/6256597 after changeset/185931535
eggie (2026-07-18 06:30:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback ..  Heb je wel iets aangepast hier?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Entbert (2026-07-18 06:39:38+00:00): Sorry für den Riesen-Changeset! Die Löschung des abgebauten Fahrkartenautomaten in Leingarten war beabsichtigt, aber sollte natürlich nicht in diesen Changeset.
alpacaMaps (2026-07-27 02:44:46+00:00): This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.

If these cameras are real, please let us know so the map stays accurate. Otherwise, we'd kindly ask that you avoid adding cameras that aren't actually there, and that you remove any temporary or test nodes once you're done.

If this was simply a mistake, no problem at all — just clean up the nodes that don't correspond to a real-world camera, and leave a quick note here so we can help.

Thanks for helping keep OpenStreetMap accurate.

— alpacaMaps
Fraxi (2026-07-18 07:42:21+00:00): С "I" трябва да е :) 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iosif_Gurko 
Има и алтернативни имена като "Joseph", "Ossip".
ОК, аз мога да ги променя, но ти можеш да коригираш бота да не въвежда английски имена...
habi (2026-07-19 08:26:27+00:00): Ciao Per 

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Ich würde euer Büro nicht als Informationen auf dem Wohngebäude erfassen, sondern als eigenständigen Punkt.

Gruss aus Bern,
habi
FajrAl (2026-07-18 15:20:39+00:00): perubahan telah dipulihkan https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185963168
arjunaraoc (2026-07-21 01:15:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and  join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185943278
GA_Kevin (2026-07-18 14:05:54+00:00): Thank you!!
Jorisbo (2026-07-18 14:56:47+00:00): np, kind regards, Joris
sembelst134 (2026-07-23 13:55:42+00:00): Hallo, steht dort neuerdings traffic_sign=DE:237 ? 
Fände ich sehr merkwürdig, denn nur die blauen Schilder definieren die Art des Weges - eine subjektive Einschätzung wie im Changelog "sieht eher aus wie..." ist unerwünscht.
Bitte an die offizielle Doku/ans Wiki halten!
Frage am Rande: hat der Weg eine neue Asphaltdecke bekommen? Im Okt. 24 waren es wenn überhaupt Asphaltüberreste
avena701 (2026-07-24 20:54:25+00:00): Hallo sembelst, nein, dort steht Z260. Ich bin lange bei OSM; ich glaube, dass du Recht hast und dass highway=path mit bicycle=permissive und foot=permissive heute die richtige Wahl ist (früher war das eher für schmale naturnahe Wege).
Die Asphaltdecke war einwandfrei und exakt 2 m breit. Offenbar ziemlich neu.
sembelst134 (2026-07-24 23:15:18+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung.
Permissive ist auch nicht richtig, da es keinerlei Duldung o.ä. unterliegt.  traffic_sign=DE:260 bedeutet einfach nur motor_vehicle=no und der Rest wie foot/bicycle ist uneingeschränkt freigegeben mit yes... und all diese Zugangsbeschränkungen sind im Tag  highway=path impliziert.
Den Weg habe ich bereits wieder korrigiert/rückgängig gemacht.
Ich kann folgendes Tool nur empfehlen wenn du dir mal unsicher bist:
https://trafficsigns.osm-verkehrswende.org/DE
nilsvi (2026-07-29 08:36:09+00:00): Hi Lovemusic,

tracktype1 sind "paved surface"

siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype

der Weg hier ist grade2. Ich habe es abgeändert.
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-18 10:38:38+00:00): Hi, I'm not sure that's accurate, are you sure it's signed as "Saint" rather than "St"?
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-25 13:10:44+00:00): I reverted this and your other changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186345566
osmviborg (2026-07-18 09:57:36+00:00): Undlad venligst at tilføje adresser på bygninger. Det bruges ikke i DK.
Rémi_ (2026-07-18 18:00:34+00:00): Bonjour
Pourquoi avoir retiré le +33 des POI ?
jcnl44 (2026-07-18 18:16:49+00:00): Bonjour,
J'utilise l'outil https://confusedbuffalo.github.io/phone-report/france pour corriger/normaliser le format des numéro de téléphone. (voir https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/mise-en-coherence-des-numeros-de-telephone/39127)
Dans le cas des numéro en 08, ils ne gèrent pas tous les appels internationaux, d'où la suppression du préfixe pour ceux-là
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-18 20:52:11+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185978416
Traveler-Andre (2026-07-23 05:51:15+00:00): Do you mean Awamori here? I created this bar / cafe just 2 days before you. So I assume your entry is a dupe and should be deleted. Thank you for your feedback!
FajrAl (2026-07-23 06:27:25+00:00): Hi, there are two Paradise Bars nearby (north and south of this cafe). Could you please check which one is the right one? Thanks!
JRod91600 (2026-07-23 10:22:31+00:00): Hi, sorry it's effectively the Awamori. So you can delete my entry.
And the paradise  bar is on the south of the Awamori.
FajrAl (2026-07-23 10:41:46+00:00): Thanks! I've deleted this entry and the Paradise Bar on the north
LakeTana (2026-07-29 18:10:51+00:00): Hi IoTWorkHub,

I noticed a few classification changes in your https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185950050 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186376644 changesets that I was hoping you could provide some additional context on.

Specifically, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169263518 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170134639 were changed from unclassified/tertiary to secondary, while https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420552681 remained unclassified, which appears to have created a classification gap. The characteristics of the road also seem somewhat different from the typical use of highway=secondary. According to the OSM Wiki, secondary highway tagging is generally used for roads that are paved, have at least one lane per direction (usually separated by a central line), and are often assigned a highway reference number (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary).

There are also several roads, including https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419269302, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537431130, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150204998, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/way 419269295, that were upgraded from primary to trunk. These appear to function as frontage roads alongside the major Vía Perimetral highway. Based on the OSM Wiki guidance on frontage roads, these would generally be expected to have a lower classification than the major highway, so I was curious about the reasoning behind these changes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Frontage_road).

Similarly, the links on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419271681 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419269307 were upgraded to trunk. As these roads appear to provide connections between the trunk dual carriageways, link seems the more appropriate classification.

Finally, multiple highways around https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1036611275 and  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1036611274 were upgraded from tertiary to primary, while https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889496256 remained tertiary. This seems to have resulted inconsistent classification and connectivity.

Could you please share some context on the reasoning behind these edits? I’d really appreciate any additional resources or local knowledge you can provide, as it would help me better understand the intended mapping approach.

Thank you, and I look forward to hearing from you!
nevw (2026-07-20 00:31:45+00:00): Hi, these two relations seem to be broken 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6063595#map=11/-30.6871/152.1759
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6063654
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.27789&lat=-30.65541&zoom=12
If you are going to be editing large relations you will need to upgrade to Josm.
Theorangewalrus (2026-07-20 02:35:33+00:00): Hi there, 

This is my private property which is incorrectly marked. 

I have been told by newtracks, Strava, Kamoot, Alltrails etc to make these changes. 

The Bicentennial National Trail has been notified that they are no longer allowed to access the property. 

I have tried to email your team OSM about 16 times in the last few montsh without reply. 

Please remove the tracks as you are pushing people onto my private property, which is a safety and severe biosecurity issue.
nevw (2026-07-20 04:37:47+00:00): My concern is that you have broken two administration boundary relations, Jeogla and Lower Creek.
I will make some changes to restore those. 
In regard to your tracks, they are mapped because they exist and appear to be tagged with access=private which seems fine to me. If you have signs up marking the area as private property with no access that should mostly prevent illegal access. Locked gates on private property may be an option.

If you want to express you views to a wider audience to further your case for more a suitable resolution you could post a message to our Oceania group on the OSM community forum. See the link to Oceania under Communities.
Or you can post to the 'Help and support' for a wider audience.

If you have emailed OSM many times already, I assume you have contacted the OSM data working group on data@openstreetmap.org but you should get correspondence replies fairly promptly though they are a very busy group.
nevw (2026-07-20 07:19:55+00:00): …and the link to the osm community fotum is https://community.openstreetmap.org/
nevw (2026-07-21 23:31:26+00:00): Hi, the changes to the admin boundary are as you made them still. I just added the section back in to the admin relations and they seem complete again. Looks like you shifted a small section to align to where a waterway is mapped. 
The boundaries were mapped using a data source we have been given explicit permission to use DCS NSW Base Map and you can use as a background when editing.
The National Bicentenial Trail
I see you have shifted the the BNT to traverse through the Cunnawarra National Park here https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=185720947 
The southern end seems unresolved so I guess the volunteers who created the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicentennial_National_Trail will need to liaise with nearby cooperative land holders and managers to reroute it.

Regarding deleting the roads and trails from the osm, that will need to be actioned by the data working group so I will forward this to them for further input and resolution.
I expect the main road affected would be Petroi Road which is tagged access=private. Arnhem Road is tagged as access=private but does not have a gate until it reaches Petroi Road. 
All the other sections appear to be sections of the BNT or Georges Trail which needs to be resolved/rerouted.
Ewen Hill (2026-07-22 00:25:12+00:00): Hi @Theorangewalrus, thank you for the detailed summary. As @Nevw did, I checked the two localities that you mentioned and both align correctly other than a very small difference on the creek already outlined by Nevw which is almost imperceptible. 

One thing to mention for yourself, @nevw and the DWG is that the NSW DCS map shows both the Bicentennial trail and Petroi Road as public ROWs - https://portal.spatial.nsw.gov.au/explorer/index.html and you may wish to also discuss the status of these tracks/roads with them.

With regard to Strava, Koomoot et al, all of these download the entire OSM dataset on a regular basis and so there is a delay to routing and mapping updates in these apps from when you make a change in OSM.

Why I am reaching out to you is that I have a fair bit of knowledge in these tools and you may dm me using the messaging function if you wish as I am more than happy to check the current routing or give guidance on processes within these apps.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-22 04:36:28+00:00): Hi. In regards to "I have made approximately 15 attempts to contact OSM by email", could you please tell me which address you would have sent these messages to? Thanks, Graeme Fitzpatrick                                                                                                                 Moderator                                                                                                                                      OSMF Data Working Group
Theorangewalrus (2026-07-23 22:50:06+00:00): Morning, 

Firstly, thank you for all coming to the party. Yes, I came on strong here because it's a highly frustrating situation. 

The email I have been sending to is Support@openstreetmap.org

I kept getting Thomas, who wasn't able to assist. 

Please note that whilst Petrio Road technically is a public road, it leads to a dead end; that road is for local residents only. Happy to give that a miss.

The bicentennial trail is not public  https://nationaltrail.com.au/ Please contact Nick Valintine; he is the board member whom we have notified that we do not consent to the trail running through our property. 

"Private landowners are not legally forced to give access; passage on the Bicentennial National Trail (BNT) through private property relies entirely on voluntary, negotiated agreements between landowners and the trail organization." 

Nick can be emailed nickovalentino@yahoo.com 
*He is aware I am working on trying to get it off the maps. 

Interms of the other property that runs through my property  which I have zigzagged in the wrong spot called "Private Track No access) on the other side of the camp ground needs to be remove it is only marked by the EPA as per the 2014 Spacial map. 

I have confirmed with historical maps, lawyers, registered fire trails and my lot it is not an easment, crownland or right of passage. 

I will leave you alone if you can just remove the two tracks at the bottom of the campground please. 

Thank you kindly
OSMDoudou (2026-07-29 13:36:40+00:00): Hello, Thank you for your contributions. I noticed changesets importing edges as 'highway=edge' instead of 'barrier=edge'. Is it intentional ? Thank you.
OSMDoudou (2026-07-29 13:39:20+00:00): Sorry, I had 'barrier=hedge' in mind. Still, I don't see highway=edge on the Wiki, so I'm wondering what it is.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-18 20:52:25+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185978416
DD1GJ (2026-07-18 12:06:14+00:00): Hallo BenBran,

der Bayernatlas ist aufgrund seiner Nutzungsbedingungen nicht als Quelle für OSM zulässig, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Germany unter Bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung

Es kann sein, dass aus diesem Grund Deine entsprechenden Edits rückgängig gemacht werden.

Viele Grüße, Joachim
Yog Sot (2026-07-18 20:00:35+00:00): byłeś tam pod sklepem?
user_5359 (2026-07-20 17:39:44+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14023912020. What is the mean of the tag addr:RU:layer = PARCEL ?
s777n (2026-07-21 16:33:06+00:00): Thanks. Fixed
Bisenz (2026-07-18 11:02:05+00:00): doplněno zemědělské pole, lneudržovaný les, a elektrické vedení
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-19 07:48:04+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Did you try to add your business?
nevw (2026-07-18 13:40:46+00:00): Mapbox and Esri imagery are more recent and available in the editors if required.
Dimitar155 (2026-07-18 12:06:04+00:00): Hello and thank you for your edit!

Such signs in German are not present on schools, bus stops and other objects in Bulgaria. It is not a good idea to add them since most local mappers can't verify them.

Happy mapping,
Dimitar
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-18 20:53:54+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185978473
Tatfahren (2026-07-18 12:35:01+00:00): Du hast den Hydrant im Melkstand platziert, "war das Absicht" (Oder ist Hydrantenjäger so unübersichtlich?)
havogel (2026-07-18 20:38:24+00:00): Hi Tatfahren, war keine Absicht, hab es so schnell ich konnte korrigiert, sorry!
havogel (2026-07-18 20:39:55+00:00): Learning für mich - mit Kindern unterwegs sein und gleichzeitig mappen war nicht so klug.
FajrAl (2026-07-18 15:12:49+00:00): Memang di tengah jalan? Lagipula isi deskripsi seperti SEO spam
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-18 20:58:46+00:00): Yup it's 100% SEO spam, 24 hours ago they already added some SEO spam copied from Google Maps which I had already reverted and commented on accordingly in changeset 185929250 (several hours prior to this changeset), with no response:

https://osm.org/changeset/185929250

And they also spammed several other SEO spam changesets with duplicate POIs, nonsense tags and advertising description=* before and after this that I also had to revert.

I reverted this changeset and the previous in changeset 185978473

https://osm.org/changeset/185978473
eggie (2026-07-18 13:31:06+00:00): Hoi.. De Groene Wandelroute is nu stuk. Eigenlijk is editor iD ongeschikt om routerelaties te bewerken.
Dat kan alleen met JOSM

Ik zal even kijken of het simpel te herstellen is.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-18 13:35:30+00:00): Groene Wandelroute hersteld.

Aanrader: 
editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047


Groet,
eggie
Daniël van den Berg (2026-07-19 14:39:40+00:00): Top, bedankt! Ik ga het de volgende keer met JOSM proberen.
eggie (2026-07-19 14:43:16+00:00): 👍
user_5359 (2026-07-20 17:45:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description, please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tourism.
FajrAl (2026-07-18 15:07:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12406081184 Terima kasih, nama Sungai Guntung sudah hilang dari peta
Triagustian (2026-07-18 16:00:42+00:00): Hilang bagaimana ? Apa sudah ganti nama sungai guntung ?
FajrAl (2026-07-18 16:19:34+00:00): Itu titiknya berubah jadi Masjid Darusallam
Triagustian (2026-07-19 05:58:54+00:00): oh iyaa, saya masukin sesusai nama masjidnya, biar mempermudah mencari titiknya
eggie (2026-07-18 13:27:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
LordGarySugar (2026-07-22 22:22:36+00:00): Hi, it's not necessary to create multipolygons that can otherwise be represented with closed ways as is the case here, it's a lot harder to work with multipolygons for a lot of users. I notice you've also merged 4 separate meadows into one larger polygon, this seems like a reduction in detail?
mavl (2026-07-21 11:05:30+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, какую ошибку исправляет этот пакет правок?
mavl (2026-07-21 14:02:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186117882 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20965].
AndresDuhour (2026-07-18 13:18:54+00:00): Hola! Quería comentarte del cambio en el nombre. Por un lado que se recomienda poner las palabras completas en lugar de la abreviatura. Y por otro si termina con ese nombre en el arroyo Los Talas. Saludos! Andrés
Emiliano Guido (2026-07-20 13:27:40+00:00): Hola Andrés. Gracias por el comentario, lo tendré en cuenta para la próxima!
El cambio de nombre lo saqué de Google Maps que es la mejor fuente de datos para esta zona que no hay nada oficial.
Saludos! Emiliano.
no details provided here (2026-07-19 08:21:55+00:00): Hi - did you get any information on the county border here and the land use at the end of Sandbook?  I've started work on the spiky buildings but conscious of doubling up.  Thanks!
pwbriggs (2026-07-19 03:42:33+00:00): Hi Jeff! Thanks for the contribution, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Feel free to reach out if you have any questions.
Kovoschiz (2026-07-19 09:08:25+00:00): Webpages for the whole chain not specifically about one branch should be `brand:website=` not `website=` (others were wrong in adding that 7-11)
vectorial8192 (2026-07-19 13:15:16+00:00): This I know, but we still know what's up when looking at the website field.
Kovoschiz (2026-07-20 17:11:18+00:00): ?
rhhs (2026-07-22 16:14:51+00:00): Thanks for solving my note. But the ruins=yes should stay with the building to the east... moved it back.
Why did you move the tags to a new node? Shouldn't they be on the building?
Dimitar155 (2026-07-22 16:48:23+00:00): Train stations mapped as areas implies that this is the whole extent of the station. Merging the node with the building means that the station covers only the area of the building which is not true for almost all of them.

This is why it is preferred to leave it as a flying node in the centre of the main building (or main platform if there is no building).
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-18 22:25:40+00:00): Hi. You've taken the apparent name off the new Estate. Assuming it's correct, please put it back on. Thanks.
Gaessje (2026-07-21 08:04:04+00:00): Ist für die Gemarkung Traisen bereits wieder aufgehoben. Für den Rest in Kürze vermutlich auch.
AidenPancakes (2026-07-18 12:48:19+00:00): I left the comment to be the same as when I added the showerhouse. Please ignore it.
FajrAl (2026-07-20 02:15:15+00:00): Terkait changeset ini: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185990751
Alangkah baiknya jika pemetaan dilakukan per petak secara bertahap daripada melakukan penghapusan massal. Karena Anda menggunakan JOSM untuk memetakan per klaster, fitur Replace Geometry akan sangat membantu daripada penghapusan.
Manukmiber (2026-07-20 02:38:44+00:00): Halo kak, Terima kasih atas sarannya. Namun area yang sudah saya hapus sudah 100% kembali dan sesuai dengan standar yang baru. Editan baru masih belum terupload karena masih saya koreksi ulang untuk menghindari adanya konflik
Hormat saya, Manukmiber
MxxCon (2026-07-22 17:37:21+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you create alt_name:zh= when there's no matching alt_name=?
Also from what I understand, name:zh* tags use the name of "Kennedy International Airport" rather than "John F. Kennedy International Airport" to match the officinal English-langauge name?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185955694
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2026-07-30 02:48:22+00:00): Creating those alt_name:zh for matching is because J.F.Kennedy usually was called 肯尼迪（Kennedy） in spoken situation and the most well-known translation of J.K.Kennedy, although in some formal situation will call his 约翰·肯尼迪 but if you only say 肯尼迪, it means the former president Kennedy, and Asian language have a tendency to auto-simplify longer names, so I think the name:zh before my changeset is reasonable and I really called it "肯尼迪国际机场" if introduced to others.  I haven't aim at "how to match every Chinese word exactly with English", why edits were based on how Chinese speakers commonly refer to this place.