piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-22 23:00:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1210165276
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1210165278
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1210165279

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
felipeeugenio (2023-09-23 14:29:00+00:00): HOla, Acá se llama Melchor o Walker martinez? hay como una mezcla de todo a estas alturas. Conoce el lugar?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141624483
felipeeugenio (2023-09-23 14:24:22+00:00): Hola. En name= va el nombre de la calle. Las numeraciones van con otros tags, por favor no mezclar estos dos conceptos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141624511
map per (2023-09-27 15:58:59+00:00): Hello Adensed

The apartment "Abdimalik Home" you added with Maps.me is uploaded to the public global OpenStreetMaps database.
Is the apartment really called "Abdimalik Home" or is that a private bookmark?

Thanks and best regards
map per
map per (2023-10-09 07:30:26+00:00): I REVERTED this Changeset
tordans (2023-09-24 04:35:27+00:00): Hallo Mopshase12, wir prozessieren die Parkstände in Berlin sehr ausführlich im Rahmen von https://parkraum.osm-verkehrswende.org/.

Bitte achte bei diesen Änderungen daher besonders darauf nicht nur die Fläche sondern auch die Straßenlinie anzupassen. Die war noch auf "parking=separate" getaggt. Ich habe es gerade mit dem praktischen Tool https://zlant.github.io/parking-lanes/#18/53.58231/10.06611 angepasst.

Damit sind die Daten aus Sicht der Prozessierung in der Tat gleich – egal ob Fläche oder "Centerline"/Straßenlinie.

Viele Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141625117
tordans (2023-09-24 04:56:10+00:00): Sorry, ich meinte natürlich "Hamburg" https://parkraum.osm-verkehrswende.org/regions/hamburg/

(Die Karte dort wird ca. einmal pro Tag aktualisiert.)
Mopshase12 (2023-09-24 09:02:40+00:00): Sorry, ist mir durchgerutscht. Normalerweise mache ich das :)
tordans (2023-09-24 10:14:18+00:00): Gar kein Problem! Danke für die vielen guten Edits in Berlin und Co.
Glassman (2023-09-23 22:40:02+00:00): Wow - I review a lot of edits in Washington State. You are the first to add airplane parking spots. Congrats. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141625191
Scout Jens (2023-09-23 09:03:03+00:00): Herzlichen Dank für die erkundete Änderung!
MarkusHD (2023-09-26 07:22:59+00:00): Gern! Ich fahre zwar mehrmals die Woche durch die Gegend zur Arbeit, aber in der Regel auf der anderen Seite der Bundesstraße, daher hat es etwas gedauert :)
lefuturiste (2023-09-23 19:56:24+00:00): Is the bridge being kept with a life cycle attribute?
skquinn (2024-08-12 22:25:04+00:00): I have updated Pickard High School. Brenham School is now a hotel (Brenham Schoolhouse Hotel, website is <https://brenhamschoolhouse.com/>) but I'm not sure if the node is on the right building.
Glassman (2023-09-23 22:41:25+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141626786
skquinn (2023-09-27 20:13:23+00:00): What is your source for this? I've driven this section of Westheimer a lot recently and the way I see it, it's really not a primary road until west of I-610.
WC392309 (2023-09-30 21:47:29+00:00): It's the main route that parallels I-69 and connects I-610 and downtown(not including Memorial Drive)
gscholz (2023-09-24 06:14:17+00:00): Hi Glorijah Noh,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways and displaced ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=21.89822&lat=12.71084&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141627053

I have reverted it to fix those issues.
Guido
map per (2023-09-23 16:34:28+00:00): Hello martinst,

concerning review_requested:
This edit looks good, I just have two small remarks:
- There was a highway highway intersectin, I quickly fixed that in (1)
- I would delete this node (2) on the power line

Best regards
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141652572
(2) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11211354932
martinst (2023-10-11 19:59:46+00:00): Thanks for the review.
I deleted the node (2) in changeset 142451136.
Leno$M (2023-09-23 04:33:10+00:00): Felicidades SantiagoNLS por tu primer edición! Yo te voy a estar apoyando con tus dudas e inquietudes que tengas con el mapa
arjunaraoc (2024-01-04 09:21:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my updates https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145871221
Happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141627702
Sandal man (2023-09-23 08:06:22+00:00): Hello,
Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)
But please make smalle change sets, this helps others in tracking changes. 
Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thank you.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-09-23 08:50:28+00:00): zsc雕像是什么雕像？是人名就写全人名，不存在的就不要到处胡乱加，谢谢！
我很好奇，这地方不是一个居民区建筑吗？怎么就成雕像了？
aTarom (2023-09-23 07:16:32+00:00): thanks for editing, I don't know the reason but these two nodes were uploaded
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11211378901/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11211378900/history
can you check it?
Thanks and best regards
DonutsAreImportant (2023-09-23 19:45:19+00:00): Thanks for catching that, just removed them
Sanderllan Costa (2023-09-26 19:03:48+00:00): muito bom
aharvey (2025-06-03 05:06:04+00:00): I've reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141628045 since it had incorrectly dragged a node to the wrong location.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:52:35+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146013576
λnko (2023-09-23 07:59:58+00:00): 您好，若您对道路中间不确定有没有栏杆之类的路障，请不要将路分为双行两道，谢谢！
λnko (2023-09-23 08:02:40+00:00): 另外，请不要随意给道路过高的道路等级，请按照道路当地实际通行量来设置道路的等级为准，谢谢！
eggie (2023-09-23 06:55:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
nevw (2023-09-23 06:05:48+00:00): The bakery is now mapped twice.
selfhosted (2023-09-23 06:08:44+00:00): Oh'really? 🤔 Hmm I didn't see that in my dataset(s) from OSM data I recently downloaded. Interesting... I'll double check... If true, do I need to do anything with this update, or just cancel it or something? 🤔
selfhosted (2023-09-23 06:09:41+00:00): Also where is the other node/entry for this? I'm having trouble finding it or I'd have suggested deleting this one 🤣
selfhosted (2023-09-23 06:13:08+00:00): Ahh I think I found the other one! It has slightly different coordinates too 🤔 -- Which I can't really verify right now without going down to the local shops and taking some coordinates on something.

I suggest we merge my edits into the existing node? My edits are more accurate/up-to-date (taken from Google™ -- which I assume the new business owner submitted)
selfhosted (2023-09-23 06:53:54+00:00): So I was just confirming with my wife, I know what's going on here. There used to be a Print Shop, but the Kenmore Village Bakery that was already existing took over the space of the Print Shop after it closed down.

That explains the different GPS coordinates of the two nodes. Going to abandon this change, and propose deleting the node instead.
nevw (2023-09-23 07:31:32+00:00): You have done well figuring this out 😀
philippec (2023-09-23 10:13:27+00:00): Kijk eens naar
https://imgur.com/DGe531h
gemaakt met Opencamera.
Thibaultmol (2023-09-23 10:49:18+00:00): ..... wat heeft dit te maken met mijn changeset...
philippec (2023-09-23 16:06:07+00:00): Ik toon je een Imgur met een datum, en ik toon meteen het belang ervan.
Er staat daat ook een note.
Frans S (2023-09-23 08:19:12+00:00): Hello for mapping.
Bonjour pour la cartographie.
Essayez de quadriller les bâtiments que vous cartographiez et ne reliez pas les nœuds entre eux. La correction de vos cartes prend beaucoup de temps.
La qualité prime sur la rapidité !

Please try to square the buildings you map and do not connect the nodes to each other. It cost so much time to correct your mappings.
Quality prevails above speed !
Best regards
tontonfabrice (2023-09-23 12:26:40+00:00): Bonjour, 
désolé, je vais tenir compte de vos remarques.
Tayvick (2023-09-26 04:08:57+00:00): And Business info*
Kovoschiz (2023-09-23 07:58:38+00:00): Please don't upload test edits to a live public database. This is considered vandalism. If you want to "test", add valid new data.
Udarian (2023-09-23 06:34:14+00:00): clarifying, if the ways that I doubt are valid are valid, they are indoor corridors so I tagged all of them as such and if any turn out to be invalid they will just be removed, this ensures that the ones that are valid end up tagged correctly in the mean time since it may be a significant amount of time untill I can verify the validity of all of these since they are in a US airport.
StC (2024-09-04 22:23:05+00:00): Hello ! J'ai été sur place hier et je n'ai pas trouvé de chemin qui rejoint le double téléski Lac depuis les bâtiments, seulement une prairie. En prenant un autre chemin plus au sud j'ai réussi à rejoindre la trace du téléski dans sa seconde moitié, donc je dirais que c'est là qu'il faut couper. Ca te convient ?
ravenfeld (2024-09-05 08:15:40+00:00): ok, on faissait passer dessous l'an dernier sur l'echappée belle mais j'ai pas fais la reco cette année c'est possible qu'il n'existe plus. Et du coup modifie en fonction de ce que tu as vu sur place.
StC (2024-09-05 12:52:33+00:00): J'ai ajouté un préfixe was: pour pouvoir le rétablir si quelqu'un d'autre le voit sur le terrain à l'avenir.
user_5359 (2023-09-25 11:21:19+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1196273480. what is the mean of this tags?
app_version = 70341
creation_date_time = 2023-09-22T23:48:59.777162
gamification = yes
id = 18708858986
last_report_date_time = 2023-09-22T23:48:59.777162
player_id = 4239400298
slug = report_network
citrula (2023-09-25 22:57:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141630618
silversurfer83 (2023-09-23 19:04:18+00:00): Gude Mario :)

kurze Frage: Der Gebäudeteil, ist der als Garage erbaut worden? Denn die Eigenschaft "building=*" beschreibt, was es für ein Gebäude ursprünglich ist. Wenn sich die Nutzung davon unterscheidet, kann das zusätzlich mit der Eigenschaft "building:use=*" dargestellt werden.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141631067
DerMarioDe (2023-09-27 08:16:36+00:00): Das Gebäude war nie eine Garage, das war falsch eingetragen.
Grüße
Mario
silversurfer83 (2023-09-27 08:21:56+00:00): Alles klar :)
Tomas_J (2023-09-25 01:39:55+00:00): Ahoj, žiadal si vykonať kontrolu tejto sady zmien. Za mňa ok, iba dve malé pripomienky: 
1.  cyklochodník si prilepil  na tento objekt - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/138627489. Mal by byť od neho oddelený, pretože nie je jeho súčasťou

a

2. geometria cyklochodníka by mala byť čo najviac zhodná a geometriou priľahlej cesty (ak to neodporuje skutočnému tvaru cyklochodníka podľa ortophoto mapy). Na mape to potom vyzerá krajšie. 

Ďakujem za si sa zapojil do mapovania .

Tomas_J
Patr1k_P (2023-09-28 15:05:52+00:00): ja mam este otazku podla coho ste usudili ze to je cycleway? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1210210992/history
Marc_ch (2023-09-23 18:16:11+00:00): Bonjour,
pourriez-vous renseigner la source utilisée svp ?
Merci pour votre compréhension et bon we
Salutations,
Marc
Pan (2023-09-23 22:22:29+00:00): Swiss topo 2023 et GWR de Simon.
Pan (2023-09-24 09:09:09+00:00): La source est sur chaque bâtiment si jamais. Bon week end aussi!
habi (2023-09-24 19:57:46+00:00): The address data `source` is not in the building.
It has been suggested that tagging the `source` on the changeset is a more "modern" approach than tagging it on each object: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source#How_to_use_on_changesets

I have set up JOSM in such a way and try to go as far as listing the relevant ZIP file from Simons GWR extracts, as seen here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141544795

Happy mapping,
habi
Pan (2023-09-24 22:08:41+00:00): Thanks for the tip. From now on, I will do just like you for the link in the changeset, it is a good idea. However, when I browse the data in JOSM, I don't see the changeset comment and the source is useful to compare the data with other sources.
Kovoschiz (2023-09-23 11:00:11+00:00): Again, please don't draw pencil tip intersections. This is already easier because of the one-way single carriageway. Simply connect the straight direction  directly, and connect the opposite direction separately to  the road to make a box like everywhere else.
Morten Lange (2023-09-23 07:58:55+00:00): Källe: https://www.hd.se/2023-09-23/e6-har-kollapsat-buss-och-bilar-med-i-raset
archie (2023-09-23 08:17:31+00:00): Bättre: https://trafiken.nu/goteborg/trafikinformation/10946533/e6-fran-stenungsundsmotet-91-till-lyckornamotet-92-bada-riktningarna/
Lucarion (2023-09-23 15:51:40+00:00): Tack för snabb redigering!
jb54osm (2023-09-23 10:44:29+00:00): Hi phd0,

This is not a shop selling to persons. It is a wholesale, only selling to companies. Selling to companies is wholesale (groothandel in Dutch).
phd0 (2023-09-23 14:58:04+00:00): Hello jb,
actually, I agree, that's why it is classified in the "shop=hardware" and not in the "shop=doityouself" more oriented towards the general public. 
I use the guide https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=brands&k=shop&v=hardware&tt=wurth#wurth-96a10c to readjust all Würths in Europe. I use Osmose via https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=brands&k=shop&v=hardware&tt=wurth#wurth-96a10c to find it. 
If you believe that "shop=hardware" is an error, I invite you to discuss it at https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index
good OSM!
Philip
jb54osm (2023-09-23 15:15:02+00:00): I think the problem is more how to connect wholesale to shop to hardware.
If I make a fake 'groothandel' in iD I get this:
shop=wholesale
name=abc
wholesale=hardware
 - -
The shop=wholesale tells it sells to companies etc only.

Your version has shop is hardware, which would indicate that it sells to public.
Morten Lange (2023-09-23 07:53:46+00:00): Bättre ? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141631842#map=17/58.05797/11.88051
Morten Lange (2023-09-23 07:57:46+00:00): Tack
mcliquid (2023-09-23 15:06:29+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141632749
Qing_Jue (2023-09-25 16:28:44+00:00): 对您的新增修正表示并不认可，已私信并申请回撤修正集。
gscscnd (2023-09-23 11:17:36+00:00): Zachęcam do traktowania highway=path jako domyślny tag dla ścieżek/dróg/chodników dla ludzi, zaś highway=footway tam, gdzie nie należy się poruszać inaczej niż pieszo (np. chodnik wzdłuż ulicy).
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-09 05:21:26+00:00): Hello!

You used
network=Icn
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11211827115/history

Have you maybe meant
network=icn
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
kapazao (2025-06-16 05:42:42+00:00): Hola, por favor es necesario que corrijas los terrenos que creaste por Trebujena y alrededores.

No se deben unir las áreas a las vías de esa forma y tampoco crear terrenos gigantes que engloben diferentes tipos de terrenos y otros elementos que no se corresponden, ya que esto es una clara edición para el render y no refleja la realidad.

Se han generado numerosos problemas ya que para editar cualquier cosa distinta al terreno hay que estar modificando este y separándolo de los elementos que no le corresponden. Por ejemplo ahora para editar cualquier camino o carretera al estar unidos a terrenos se mueven todos innecesariamente.

Yo iré arreglando lo posible pero si veo que no están bien formados y supone mucha dificultad y tiempo la edición en la zona por culpa de estos me temo que suprimiré lo necesario.

Un saludo
eggie (2023-09-23 09:20:40+00:00): Hi GG  This is not Wielingenstraat 20.
Please add your info at the present addressnode.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2023-09-23 09:25:21+00:00): I merge your info with the addressnode.
Gr eggie
GrumpyGorilla (2023-09-23 10:14:03+00:00): Sorry about that. Thanks for fixing it!
eggie (2023-09-23 10:16:09+00:00): No problem 😀
Jorieke V (2023-09-23 13:22:14+00:00): Hello Hassan, I noticed your comment about digitizing roads. We have received recent imagery as of Sept 1, 2023. That is covering the refugee camp. I will  message you in private about it!
snoozingnewt (2023-09-24 21:44:12+00:00): You changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/642162308/history to a building when it was a forest. Please be more careful next time. 

Thanks,
snoozingnewt
elsy1 (2023-09-24 17:33:27+00:00): درود دلیل اینکه جاده های مربوطه رو حذف کردید چیست
ivanbranco (2023-10-12 15:56:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 142479388
DorivalSjr (2023-10-13 01:06:15+00:00): Hi, I'm new here and could I know what I did wrong? I want to contribute, as I spend time, to making the map perfect!
ivanbranco (2023-10-13 06:25:04+00:00): I don't know, I just reported it to you since the user who reverted it didn't.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-09 05:21:16+00:00): Hello!

You used
network=Icn
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11211960138/history

Have you maybe meant
network=icn
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
qaz789 (2023-10-17 18:44:59+00:00): ta ścieżka istnieje na powierzchni, nie ma tam żadnego tunelu?
Zommersteinhof (2023-10-22 16:17:05+00:00): Dziękuję za uwagę, przeoczyłem ten moment. Owszem jest tam rura pod sztuczną tamą
Langlaeufer (2023-09-23 10:30:08+00:00): Hi, warum hast du denn ref=27 beim Knotenpunkt gelöscht?  Erfasst man das nicht mehr so?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141636457
klnkengi (2023-09-23 11:56:43+00:00): Hi, 
laut Wiki soll "ref" an Wegweisern die Nummer des Wegweisers erfassen. Nach meinem Verständnis ist das nicht die Nummer des Knotenpunktes, sondern so eine Nummer, wie sie der User Streckenkundler im Spreewald systematisch erfasst hat (z.B. hier: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2903460706). Die Knotenpunkt-Nummer ist ja als rcn_ref am Knotenpunkt selbst erfasst.
Langlaeufer (2023-09-23 11:59:36+00:00): O.k. macht Sinn - hab auch gerade Knotenpunkt und Wegweiser verwechselt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141636457
openblop (2023-11-03 09:53:17+00:00): Bonjour, je serais intéressé de savoir pourquoi vous avez remplacé le tag highway:footway par highway:pedestrian sur la place GrandClément. De ma vision, on est plus sur des "chemins" que sur des rues. 
Merci par avance pour votre réponse.
Gonéo (2023-11-06 21:40:35+00:00): Bonjour, sur l'open-data et sur l'imagerie aérienne l'avenue Paul Krüger est à double-sens. Est-ce qu'elle est passée récemment à sens unique ?

Dans ce cas (et dans tous les cas en fait) un commentaire explicite de changeset serait plus simple pour comprendre. Ceci fait partie des bonnes pratiques explicitées dans le wiki.

D'autre part, si c'est en sens unique il faudrait mettre aussi à jour les lane:forward/backward
gscscnd (2023-09-23 11:13:40+00:00): Przerabiając highway=tertiary na highway=construction dodawaj construction=tertiary (itp.).
map per (2023-09-23 11:13:58+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Sieht gut aus, danke! Hab nur noch "shop=food" gelöscht, weil Objekte in OSM nur entweder als shop oder als Cafe eingetragen werden.

Viele Grüße
map per
Tunturikyy (2023-09-23 10:49:43+00:00): Moro! Viitaten muutoskokoelmakommentteihisi "yleistä päivitystä", vinkkaan ystävällisesti luettavaksesi linkin wiki-sivun.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
eggie (2023-09-23 12:09:54+00:00): warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway

That was the crossing with the cycleway

I added a node for the connection
eggie (2023-09-23 11:15:46+00:00): Hi GG, Is the Wielingenstraat already open for traffic?

Greetz,
eggie
GrumpyGorilla (2023-09-23 11:22:55+00:00): Not yet. Still 1-way. It should conclude next month at which point they'll be focused on Diepenbrockstraat
eggie (2023-09-23 11:39:59+00:00): Oke.. top!
By the way... I changed the situation in the Krammerstraat according your picture.
GrumpyGorilla (2023-09-23 11:46:27+00:00): I saw that, thanks. Now that I've learned to use the editor directly I tried making a small correction in this edit, but I don't see it made yet. Perhaps it needs reviewed since I'm still new:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141638005
eggie (2023-09-23 12:10:55+00:00): CTRL-F5 ... to empty your cache. 
That will do the miracle.
GrumpyGorilla (2023-09-23 12:40:19+00:00): That did it, thanks!
eggie (2023-09-23 11:13:07+00:00): Hi... You asked for feedback   This is okay.
Greetz,
eggie
NorthCrab (2023-09-23 14:06:38+00:00): I have reverted this edit as the disputed state is already marked. This change broke a country relation and is of low effort.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141646896
mcliquid (2023-09-23 15:07:18+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141638955
eggie (2023-09-23 11:37:46+00:00): Mooi j.  ... weer actueel.
Je vraagt om feedback..
surface=gravel is nauwelijks te fietsen. grade1 klopt ook niet met de aandere tags. Dat zal dan grade2 moeten zijn.
(grade1 is verhard asphalt beton straatstenen)
Het zal dan waarschijnlijk om surface=fine_grave gaan.

bicycle=yes hoort niet op een fietspad foot=yes hoeft ook niet.
motor_vehicle=no is ook default. 
Dat is default.
Weet je om welk type fietspad het gaat?

Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141639893


Mvg
eggie
eggie (2023-09-23 11:44:17+00:00): Alle accesstags op de Mullingsweg zijn default. Niet toevoegen dus.