piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Lola Fox (2026-02-20 17:56:13+00:00): >What you are doing here and elsewhere it to assemble several relations in one single collection. You can see this clearly from the outside here as there is a part top left outside of the "relation":
relation/20194832/history#map=13/44.46001/12.04196

You are right. I didn't notice this particular. Sorry!

>There are more assembled part more south but not so easy to see. An other indicator is the fact that there is one way twice in this collection:
way/1479642507/history#map=19/44.462764/12.047823

Right! Already corrected!

> Please adjust your editing style, it prevents errors and eases maintainability. 

Yes. Ok. Understand. :-) Thank you for your feedback. Guido is an italian mane: are you italian? In this case we can speak italian directly.
Thank you again.
NeisBot (2026-02-15 17:24:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/640767461 v11 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1020198388 v2 | 6 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178592030
nevw (2026-02-15 22:57:23+00:00): Hi, the ‘incorrect’ section of the cycleway you deleted appears to be the part that joins the cycleway to the road so that proper routing can be used. The cyclists must join the main road at this point so it should connect. A similar small section joins the main road before the traffic lights to. Connectivity is important for cyclists using navigation apps. The mapping of cycleway does end at the physical end point of the concrete surface in these particular junctions. Or is there a signage that indicates that cycleway users should not join the road at this point?
Gpapaniko (2026-02-15 23:36:38+00:00): thanks, yes you are correct.  Note that short section of path is not specifically marked as a cycle way
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-15 19:28:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 178596696, 178596698, 178596701, 178596694 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-15 19:28:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 178596696, 178596698, 178596701, 178596694 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import
trial (2026-02-15 18:48:43+00:00): Bonjour, quel est cet import brut non discuté ? Merci d'annuler vos modifications.
trial (2026-02-15 18:53:56+00:00): Deux exemples : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1478887035#map=18/47.899641/-3.491153&layers=N ne correspond pas à l'ortho, ajout de tags non OSM.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1478887035#map=17/47.899376/-3.489409&layers=N
pas de conflation avec https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418611431#map=16/47.89754/-3.48300&layers=N
trial (2026-02-15 19:36:13+00:00): Danke!
woodpeck (2026-02-15 19:38:46+00:00): Dear Fedorova19, when uploading edits to OSM, please provide a human-readable description of your edits in the "changeset comment". You have used the text "we" for describing all your edits, which does not say anything meaningful. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-15 23:54:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/708629089

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
tremaga (2026-02-16 09:33:20+00:00): Danke, so ists besser 👍
tguen (2026-02-19 21:23:29+00:00): Why did you change brand:wikidata to not:brand:wikidata? This is wrong, please revert.
tguen (2026-03-06 05:54:54+00:00): I fixed it
JakovBušić (2026-02-17 12:34:15+00:00): Hgv restriction was removed from the part of the road where there are no according signs in changeset 178677691. #OptimoRoute
CjMalone (2026-02-20 18:44:51+00:00): I expect the southmost one (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10083312695#map=19/50.623826/-1.174582&layers=N) will be accessable again in summer, but we will see.
Colbertson (2026-02-15 18:12:34+00:00): Is the path actually completely gone? I can still see something on lidar.
Also you didnt remove the relation.
richlv (2026-02-15 21:40:48+00:00): Yeah, if the path still exists (it sounds like it does), it should be restored.
Mannivu (2026-02-15 20:50:25+00:00): Hi, why have you removed substations? I've seen that in one case you moved the tags on the service buildings, but in the other cases you just deleted the substations without moving the tags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178593682
simone (2026-02-15 22:00:19+00:00): fixed
NeisBot (2026-02-15 18:15:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/24054448 v9 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/685295927 v2 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/6421725621 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178593905
NeisReview (2026-02-24 05:34:56+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178610585
Patryk2710 (2026-02-15 19:08:30+00:00): Hej! Dlaczego usunąłeś defibrylator?
Kamil Kalata (2026-02-15 19:25:02+00:00): Witaj!
Poza defibrylatorem usunąłeś także kilka innych obiektów, przede wszystkim pomniki przyrody. Ponadto, dodałeś nieistniejące wejścia do jaskiń. Zostałem więc zmuszony cofnąć Twoje zmiany.
Proszę Cię, żebyś następnym razem nie czynił podobnie. Gdybyś miał jakiekolwiek pytanie, możesz je zadać na OSM Community; dla początkujących został utworzony specjalny wątek (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/pytania-poczatkujacych/52707/6532).
dknelson9876 (2026-02-17 04:32:38+00:00): Hi zibetnu,

Just because there's no physical separation between the drive-through and the rest of surface in these cases doesn't mean there's not a reason to map them separately. Without mapping them as separate ways, how else would you express that there is a dedicated line along the surface where traffic is one way, and has the purpose of being a service=drive-through where vehicles queue separate from those driving around or parking?
zibetnu (2026-02-17 19:43:36+00:00): I agree with your reasoning, but as I am notoriously unsure of myself I asked for clarification here:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/should-drive-throughs-be-mapped-as-separate-ways-when-not-physically-separated-from-other-roads/141615
zibetnu (2026-02-18 02:59:20+00:00): Reverted in 178705196.
Layft Greater (2026-05-04 11:34:10+00:00): reverted in 182200615
JakovBušić (2026-02-17 12:57:49+00:00): Wrong hgv restrictions made in this changeset were set right in changeset 178678804. "OptimoRoute"
AlbaireN (2026-02-16 16:00:16+00:00): Salut,
Les travaux de la piste cyclable longeant le campus 2 à l'ouest ne sont pas terminés. Ce devrait être une voie verte d'où les tags que j'avais indiqué. J'attends la finalisation du chemin et des raccords pour lui attribuer les bons tags.
Berdly (2026-02-16 00:28:12+00:00): Guess I got the Solomon Islands mapping squad together, hah!
Rainero (2026-03-15 13:23:38+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179897998
(unzulässige Quelle)
Busaiolis (2026-02-17 16:02:27+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che stai aggiornando le ciclabili. Non è necessario sostituire highway=path, perché si tratta di un tag legittimo per le piste ciclopedonali (a patto che sia specificato bicycle=designated e foot=designated), come puoi vedere nella [wiki](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway%3Dpath).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178595205
QuiLe (2026-02-15 21:40:43+00:00): Hello, Please make more descriptive changeset comments so we can know what you have done. Do you have a source for this highway being renamed to Collin County Outer Loop? Also the usage of network=US:TX:CCOL may not be correct, most likely network=US:TX:Collin would be more accurate. However, it depends who the operator is see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Texas/State_Route_Relations for more information.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178595350
aTarom (2026-02-16 10:58:42+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar,
el tag
"pool_heating"
para piscinas, según la wiki es
"heating"
los cambio,
tienes más info en
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=swimming%20pool?uselang=en
Cheers
aTarom (2026-02-16 11:02:50+00:00): quería decir
"heated"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:heated
sorry
jeka p (2026-02-19 19:56:11+00:00): Hola,
thanks. I somehow did not find the tag before... 
I'll correct it.
BR
Allin_kindA (2026-02-19 17:41:27+00:00): Может уже прекратишь усложнять съезды в угоду своему навигатору? Мне каждый раз приходится что-то чинить, обновлять, добавлять после твоих правок. Как то это выбивается из политики картографирования "JustForFun", не?
oleinap (2026-02-19 18:07:46+00:00): https://yandex.ru/maps/?ll=33.374774%2C67.569997&z=17.85
улицы Козлова, Ферсмана и Строителей имеют выезды на кольцо, а Пригородная не имела.
https://yandex.ru/maps/?ll=33.357133%2C67.566975&z=17.85
oleinap (2026-02-19 18:08:54+00:00): прошу покажи, что пришлось поправлять после меня?
Allin_kindA (2026-02-19 18:35:59+00:00): Конкретно сейчас поломан маршрут автобуса под номером 210. Мончегорск - Апатиты. Но это поправимо. Дело не в этом. Ты зачем-то усложняешь почти все съезды добавляя лишние. Всё это можно было сделать правилами на полосах. Благо есть в ДЖОСМ даже визуальный редактор. Но ты его игнорируешь. Почему?
oleinap (2026-02-19 18:39:14+00:00): джосм перестал меня "принимать", не может сохранять мои правки. Я не знаю, почему.
Помоги с ним
Taya_S (2026-02-18 14:10:31+00:00): Reverted petty vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178727985
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-15 19:28:05+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 178592537, 178592543, 178592549, 178592553.
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-15 19:28:04+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 178592537, 178592543, 178592549, 178592553.
aTarom (2026-02-16 10:56:09+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar,
en España
el tag
"crossing_ref"
está deprecated
por
"crossing:markings"
tienes más info en la wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing%20ref?uselang=en
Cambiados
Cheers
jeka p (2026-02-19 19:53:45+00:00): Hola,
many thanks for the tip.
I will use this scheme from now on:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:markings
Cheers
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-15 19:31:19+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 177746482, 178559528, 178560063, 178560190, 178560339, 178560350, 178560351, 178560354, 178560359, 178560364, 178560365, 178560366, 178560367, 178560368, 178560369, 178560370, 178560371, 178560372, 178560374, 178560376, 178560377, 178560379, 178560381, 178560384, 178560386, 178560390, 178560392, 178560393, 178560394.
MassCartog (2026-02-16 14:28:42+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. can you explain why you removed these features?
StreetSurveyor (2026-02-22 13:45:42+00:00): Hi there! Sunny Ct isn't an actual street name. Verified no buildings carry that address via https://app01.cityofboston.gov/parcelviewer/ and no street sign is present.
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-15 19:31:20+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 177746482, 178559528, 178560063, 178560190, 178560339, 178560350, 178560351, 178560354, 178560359, 178560364, 178560365, 178560366, 178560367, 178560368, 178560369, 178560370, 178560371, 178560372, 178560374, 178560376, 178560377, 178560379, 178560381, 178560384, 178560386, 178560390, 178560392, 178560393, 178560394.
k2101 (2026-02-15 20:42:44+00:00): Dlaczego ograniczono cmentarz do terenu, na którym są groby? Zgodnie z webewidencją powiatu cały ten teren jest cmentarzem 
https://gis.powiat.krosno.pl/e-uslugi/portal-mapowy
uprkos (2026-02-15 20:44:16+00:00): W OSM interesuje nas stan faktyczny, a nie urzędowy.
k2101 (2026-02-15 20:50:20+00:00): Czyli dodajemy sobie pracy w przyszłości, wymagając wówczas zwiększania terenu cmentarza. No okej. Nie było to konieczne. 
Ale jakbyś mógł przywrócić landuse w formie trawnika, to będę wdzięczny :)
uprkos (2026-02-15 21:01:22+00:00): Takie są oficjalne zasady... Mapujemy to co w terenie, a dotyczy to landuse, dróg, adresów itp... Toteż skrupulatność nie pozwoliła mi tego odpuścić :). Trawniki dodane!
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2026-03-16 11:18:02+00:00): Please do not add access=yes to highways. It allows too many vehicles (cars, busses, snowmobiles, etc).
dknelson9876 (2026-02-18 02:27:47+00:00): Hi Halfdeaf007,

After I pointed out why this mapping style is incorrect on a previous changeset of yours, why do you continue to create multipolygons to cut parking areas out of landuses?
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-15 23:54:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/406134049

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kiritimati_c7g (2026-02-15 23:47:02+00:00): can my changeset comments stop breaking 😭
*fix tags, center paths/roads in veterans memorial park
Leo Slager (2026-03-04 23:38:17+00:00): Beide huisnummers 112 samengevoegd.
NeisBot (2026-02-15 20:30:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1013218573 v2 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1242125722 v3 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7257975302 v3
https://osm.org/node/10023221534 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178598616
Langlaeufer (2026-02-15 21:32:33+00:00): building_passage bekommt daher keinen layer=-1 und die Zufahrt (zur Polizei) ist kein Fußweg (da parken auch Autos). Habe es geändert.
Toli99 (2026-02-25 21:11:10+00:00): Харківська державна академія фізичної культури - це не Харківська державна академія культури, яка зазначена в документі з посилання. Тому зміна назви на мапі є неправильною.
JakovBušić (2026-02-17 13:04:50+00:00): Hgv restrictions were removed from the intersection with South Colorado Avenue in changeset 178679044. "OptimoRoute"
Lužicki Bieluch (2026-03-04 18:18:46+00:00): Most został przez przypadek "usunięty" - brak wyświetlenia mostu na mapie
ssundell (2026-02-22 21:12:52+00:00): Länsipäässä on Elvalan venesataman parkkipaikka ja siellä polun reunassa jalkakäytävän merkki. Itäpäässä en tiedä, onko rannan suuntaisen polun alussa mitään merkintää, mutta Ojustenkadulta rantaan kulkeva väylä on merkitty jalkakäytäväksi.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178599993
lankapuhelin (2026-02-23 10:44:35+00:00): Kiitokset kommentista! Hyvä tietää liikennemerkistä. Aion kysyä merkin aiheellisuudesta kaupungilta ja palaan tähän vastauksen saatuani. Epäilen merkin virallisuutta ja asettamisperusteita.
lankapuhelin (2026-03-02 11:05:38+00:00): Sain vastauksen kaupungilta (nopeaa toimintaa!). Vastauksen mukaan merkki on vanha, ja sillä on luultavasti tarkoitettu, että reitti on yleisessä käytössä. Vastauksessa myönnetään, ettei merkille ole perusteita, ja merkki tullaan poistamaan.

Poistamisen aikataulusta ei kerrottu. Siinähän saattaa mennä kuukausia, tai sitten ei. Ajattelisin itse, että näiden tietojen valossa bicycle-arvoa ei kannata muuttaa merkin poistamista odottavalle ajalle takaisin arvoon no, mutta tokihan näin voi tehdä, jos huvittaa ja jaksaa muutella arvoa edestakaisin vielä.
rskedgell (2026-04-28 16:56:22+00:00): Are the "id" tags on these buildings the house numbers? If so, they should be tagged as addr:housenumber=* , if not what do they represent?
Glassman (2026-02-15 22:13:39+00:00): We don't use descriptive names unless they are posted on the field. Can you verify that there are signs with the fields name? 

Also, please use a brief descriptive changeset comment. Like "Added farms and a pond.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178601374
QuiLe (2026-02-16 01:19:01+00:00): This edit looks good!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178601510
Comino (2026-02-16 08:03:40+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Maps
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
Comino (2026-02-16 08:05:57+00:00): And one more mistake...

In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes".

The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NOT accepted.
Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Cryptocurrencies_with_payment_tag and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:*#Cryptocurrencies

Please REMOVE the payment:cryptocurrencies=yes !

Thank you.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Maps
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-16 07:49:43+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind removing more or less all name:* tags of the train station?

Best reagrds,
Pascal
ivanruiz (2026-02-16 08:46:12+00:00): Hi Pascal,
Because the name of the station is a proper noun and it's better not to be translated to avoid confusing the user. Likewise, I'm open to any suggestions to improve.
Best regards,
Ivan
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-16 10:32:21+00:00): Hola Ivan,

thank you for your reply.

I am not really in a position to assess the translations in the various languages. Personally, however, I always find it a pity when contributions made by other members, in this case the station name in different languages with understandable tagging, are removed from an OSM feature.

Best regards,
Pascal
FajrAl (2026-02-16 03:57:24+00:00): ini harusnya place=hamlet

this should be in place=hamlet
kiritimati_c7g (2026-02-15 23:45:47+00:00): *add foot path (uploaded before i could change cc)
NieWnen (2026-02-15 23:05:44+00:00): Cześć,
jakie jest źródło tych zmian i dlaczego zostały usunięte maxheight?
stasiu512 (2026-02-15 23:19:38+00:00): Cześć, z tym miejscem jest ogólnie ciekawa dość sytuacja, zaczynając od źródła jest nim mapillary -https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=820289613922887&lat=52.197161388889&lng=20.850282777778&z=17&focus=photo&x=0.8361435861952455&y=0.5675028623390744&zoom=0. maxheight na jezdni najprawdopodobniej było pomylone z maxwidth. nie znalazłem żadnych zakazów wysokości pojazdu, nie miałby on też za bardzo sensu, nie ma tu mostu czy ogranicznika wysokości tym bardziej że mamy już zakaz pojazdów ciężarowych który uszczegółowiłem. Dodatkowo z węzłów usunąłem niezrozumiałe tagi dotyczące np autokarów których nie stosuje się na punktach. Końcowo maxwidth zmieniłem na maxwidth:physical, autor najprawdopodobniej korzystał dobrze z tagy maxwidht którego stosuje się tylko jeśli wjazd szerszych pojazdów jest prawnie zakazany. dodałem też infoemacje o pierwszeństwie i zakazie wyprzedzania zgodnie z oznakowaniem mapillary. Pozdrawiam:)
stasiu512 (2026-02-15 23:22:28+00:00): oczywiście miałem na myśli, iż autor nie stosował poprawnie tagu maxwidth, zdjęcia na mapillary są w miare świeże, starsze niż edycja
stasiu512 (2026-02-15 23:22:50+00:00): wróć edycja jest starsza niż zdjęcia, zakręcony dziś jestem:D
stasiu512 (2026-02-15 23:27:42+00:00): Okej widzę twoją edycje ze źródłem już przywracam
stasiu512 (2026-02-15 23:32:35+00:00): dzięki za czujność i przepraszam za błąd. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178603756
rarad74 (2026-02-16 07:37:56+00:00): Salut, Te rog nu mai pune bretele de acces la giratorii mici ca diametru si in plus daca acestea nu exista fizic ca la giratoriul de pe Emil Racovita. Sunt prea mici, nu se vad pe harta nici la cel mai apropiat zoom si complici aiuea rutarea. Ar terebui sa dau revert la tot changesetul deoarece m-am chinut mult sa fac cum trebuie restrictiile de viraj si repozitionarea drumului dupa trackuri GPX de pe Emil Racovita, dar ai editat deodata in prea multe locuri. Pe viitor editeaza pe sectiuni mai mici. Multumesc.
Mashin (2026-02-16 08:34:59+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!

Thanks for the edits, they look very good. Though are you sure about presence of this pond (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1479058608)? There is nothing visible in any imagery nor in LiDAR data. Also as a note, name=* tag is for actual names like Nepaug Reservoir and not for descriptive names i.e. "pond".

Cheers
Allison P (2026-02-24 00:34:32+00:00): The name "CTLM Lot" is pretty frequently used and appears on official maps.
Hypsometric (2026-02-24 04:47:34+00:00): Nothing reliable came up in searching for "CTLM".  Do those other maps show who the operator is? I assume CTLM is the name of a building or business?
nevw (2026-02-15 23:58:15+00:00): It needs to join the osm mapped road so I made the connection. Thanks for your quick reply. All fixed now.
nevw (2026-02-16 03:40:18+00:00): Hi, state, postcode and suburb are optional as these are fully mapped with their boundaries in osm.
Mashin (2026-02-20 16:10:37+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
Your edits are good, but just a couple of comments.

- landuse=* tag goes on areas that cover some land and not on the buildings themselves. E.g. if it's a residential area it encompasses buildings, parking lots, parks,..

- when you are finished drawing a building you can press Q to make it's angles 90˚

I went ahead and removed the landuse tag from those buildings.

Cheers
nsgold (2026-02-20 17:16:54+00:00): Oh thank you for letting me know! :)
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-16 08:00:32+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Thank you for adding the translations of the stadium name.

I am not a multilingual expert, but I was wondering if we could make a few adjustments to improve consistency. What do you think about using the following tags instead?

name=Etihad Stadium name:de=Etihad Stadium name:en=Etihad Stadium name:uk=Етіхад Стедіум
name:zh=伊蒂哈德球场
name:zh-Hans=伊蒂哈德球场 name:zh-Hant=伊蒂哈德球場

Best regards,
Pascal
HAALAND_ (2026-02-16 10:50:30+00:00): @pitscheplatsch 在中国，大家都用阿提哈德球场/伊蒂哈德球场两种名字称呼此球场，这就是我为什么要添加两个中午翻译的原因，我探索阿提哈德航班的中文官网，发现他们自称“阿提哈德”我认为可以把此足球场name:zh hans 和 hant简化为“阿提哈德球场”
HAALAND_ (2026-02-16 10:52:53+00:00): @pitscheplatsch In China, this stadium is commonly referred to as either 伊蒂哈德球场 or 阿提哈德球场. This is why I've included two Chinese translations. I explored the official Chinese website of Etihad Airways and found that they refer to themselves as "Etihad." I believe it's appropriate to simplify the stadium's name (name: zh hans) and hant to “阿提哈德球场”