piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
olo81 (2023-06-20 00:58:33+00:00): aktualne tagowanie wyklucza się, do poprawy
olo81 (2023-06-20 15:53:18+00:00): zestaw zmian wycofany
michel60 (2023-06-19 14:20:32+00:00): Bonjour, ça serait bien de formatter les numéros de téléphone avec les espaces comme le propose l'éditeur ID non ? 
+33 3 44 07 50 26  au lieu de +33344075026
ThomR (2023-06-19 18:11:57+00:00): Bonjour, 
Les espaces ne sont pas décrits comme obligatoires pour stocker le numéro : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:phone
Le format sans espaces est celui proposé par l'outil d'appariement Osmose avec le Finess.
tordans (2023-06-25 04:32:18+00:00): Hey Iberges, danke für die Korrekturen. Könntest du uns noch etwas schreiben, auf welcher Datenbasis du die Änderungen vornimmst (am besten mit Link)? Danke!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137503463
lberges (2023-06-25 09:43:01+00:00): Vorlage: https://wambachers-osm.website/Postcodes.html?map=15/50.1115/8.098&base=OSM&data=
user_5359 (2023-06-19 08:09:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osmp.org/way/1183333097. We use alway the key highway for a street, way, road (name it)!
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-06-19 07:25:25+00:00): 被回退的changeset： https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136966425

类似情况： 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137227889 （被 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137289181 退回）
Type-Style (2023-06-23 15:26:46+00:00): Bestätigung der Gemeinde via eMail, dass dort derzeit keine Tiere sind und es auch vorher sowie jetzt keine touristische Einrichtung ist. Besichtigungen seien nicht möglich.
danieldegroot2 (2023-10-11 12:55:19+00:00): Proposed cycleway seems to end halfway at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5515919408

Are you sure there is a dead end here?
eggie (2023-10-11 14:06:13+00:00): Daniel...  
Zit even mee te kijken. Net wat water aangepast. 
Vorige week daar nog gefietst. 
Dat gebied is nu in ontwikkeling en je kunt er nauwelijks komen of je hebt kans te worden platgereden door zandauto's. 
Volgens mij zijn die proposed paden al weer aangepast. 
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=11-10-2022&loc=51.81354%2C4.561558%2C17z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-09-16&acqid=20230916_110409_PNEO-03_1_40&sensor=Pleiades-NEO
Groet
eggie
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-17 12:37:58+00:00): Could you share sources for these?
MapperrZPolski (2026-05-09 10:18:05+00:00): Dodawanie fikcji to nie rozwiązanie. Edycja błędna
Leo Slager (2023-06-19 11:02:55+00:00): Hi Acorn,

Access= private is the correct tag.
Can you add the contact possibilitys:
website
email
or phone ?
dentonny (2023-07-22 09:27:08+00:00): Hi Lennard,

There is no street-sign on site where it says this oneway highway isn't for cyclists. 
Check recent streetview imagery here:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/org/osmbelgium?lat=51.1638469&lng=4.9755271&z=17&pKey=1008447730183985&focus=photo&x=0.4082514773703663&y=0.5581186935100784&zoom=1.533219761499148
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2023-07-06 13:07:47+00:00): Hi. You've added a lot of landuses here. But if I check the aerial, I can't see why this <https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15812548> is mapped as heath, where as this <https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15812779> is just sand. They look the same to me... Why did you mapt them different? Am I missing something?
hatul (2024-10-08 19:32:46+00:00): שלום, מה הצבע של הסימון? הקטע מוגדר צהוב אבל היחס אדום.
Timmy_Tesseract (2023-06-25 13:02:05+00:00): Good day Grandasse. This is Madrid in Surigao del Sur, Philippines. Not the capital city of Spain.
aixbrick (2023-06-19 11:41:13+00:00): Hallo,
bitte nach Möglichkeit keine landuse mit Grenzen verbinden (hier: Becken <-> NSG). Grenzen folgen in den seltensten Fällen landuse-Flächen. Der nächste Mapper passt das Becken an irgendein Luftbild an und dann stimmt die Grenze des NSG nicht mehr.
Nebenbei bemerkt: Wirklich sehen kann man die Grenzen des Beckens auf Luftbild oder Hillshade ja nicht...
Gruß
Biff (2023-06-19 15:27:26+00:00): Du hast recht, die Verbindung zum NSG ist nicht hilfreich. Teile der Grenzen des Beckens kann man auf Hillshade zwar erkennen, aber nicht den zuletzt geänderten Bereich. Ich suche mal nach einer besseren Quelle.
4004 (2023-06-22 11:51:34+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
ничего там не помню, новая постройка?
Supaplex (2023-06-19 10:50:38+00:00): 台灣華語：台電一期風場 (彰化芳苑外海的離岸一期示範風場)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137506605
ivanbranco (2023-06-20 16:09:20+00:00): Ciao dixco87, grazie per le modifiche!

ricordati solo che per wikimedia_commons=* c'è una sintassi da seguire, per esempio dovrebbe essere wikimedia_commons=File:Linea volo 70° Stormo.jpg invece di wikimedia_commons=https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Latina_Air_Base?uselang=it#/media/File:Linea_volo_70%C2%B0_Stormo.jpg

buon mapping :)
jxpsert (2023-06-19 14:14:34+00:00): De tennisclub bestond al, in deze node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2856116426

Echter wordt deze niet weergegeven op de kaart; ik neem aan dat je daarom de jouwe hebt aangemaakt?
Noah Reijnen (2023-06-20 12:23:28+00:00): Ja, maar ik zie 'm echter nog steeds niet
jxpsert (2023-06-20 12:47:56+00:00): Klopt, tennisclubs worden niet weergegeven op de kaart. Geen idee waarom, maar de data is nu correct.
jaap de vries (2023-07-11 06:34:02+00:00): Ter plekke kijken heeft mi nog steeds de voorkeur. Ik heb hier de padelvelden toegevoegd die nog als tennisbanen waren weergegeven. Daarnaast nog e.e.a. aangepast.
Taya_S (2023-06-20 04:43:23+00:00): hallo 726_not_found,

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Groeten,
Taya
Sylabowy Kot (2025-05-11 12:40:30+00:00): Hej, parę miesięcy po twojej zmianie zostało założone Stowarzyszenie Ogrodowe ROD "Nowa Prażynka", jako wydzielenie z PZD. Jako że zmiana pochodzi z locla knowledge, jesteś w stanie może potwierdzić, czy ogród zmienił nazwę lokalnie na "Nowa Prażynka", czy jest to zabieg kosmetyczny do nazwy stowarzyszenia?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-01 10:07:09+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10989108826/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-25 11:44:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3799582 - była tam może też rzeźba Floriana ?
ڕاستی (2023-06-21 17:23:51+00:00): Hello, can please tell me you deleted Kurdish name (ckb and ku) and changed the main name to Arabic?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137508568
ڕاستی (2023-06-21 17:31:37+00:00): And you deleted a self advertisement name (good one) then instead revert to original name changed to Arabic name. Please explain it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137508568
LockOnGuy (2023-06-21 17:32:16+00:00): Hello ڕاستی, All of these ckb and ku names were wrong, as I said in changeset comment "remove fake names added by users as self advertisement."     
I removed the fake names, and put the correct and real ones in.     
I see you commented via OSMCha, so I believe you can see what the changes is, did you find anything you are not satisfied with?      
Regards.
LockOnGuy (2023-06-21 17:35:33+00:00): Hi ڕاستی, I removed the fake advertisement and put the names with my knowledge to streets. I used Arabic as it's a language I'm familiar with and it's and official language of KRG, see:  
 https://archive.gov.krd/dfr/dfr.gov.krd/p/p9728.html#:~:text=Language-,The%20Kurdistan%20Region%E2%80%99s%20official%20languages%20for%20government%20purposes%20are%20Kurdish%20and%20Arabic.,-The%20two%20most    
Regards.
ڕاستی (2023-06-22 11:30:03+00:00): Hi LockOnGuy I know you deleted self advertisement name as I mentioned you did great edit that is good but instead of revert to the original and correct name you deleted. So please revert do not deleted the Official name.
LockOnGuy (2023-06-22 11:33:40+00:00): Hello, I did not delete office names or any correct information, I removed self advertising in name tag and put the official and correct name as a name of ways in an official language indeed.    
Best regards.
ڕاستی (2023-06-22 19:38:46+00:00): On June 6, 2023 9:28 AM with changeset no:	136999057 , a person with username Kura bokani changed name from (شەقامی بارزانی نەمر) to (کوتاڵی فەرمان), ckb name from (شەقامی بارزانی نەمر) to (کوتاڵی فەرمان), KU name from (Kolana Barzanî Nemirê) to (Kolana jli kurdi farman), EN name from (Barzani Nemir Street) to (Jli Kurdi Farman Street) and AR name from (شارع برزاني نمر) to (اقمشة فرمان). Then you deleted CKB, EN and main name tag and corrected AR tag name. But instead revert misinformation tag names you deleted and filled up main tag in Arabic this must be in Kurdish not Arabic. Now it is clear or you still ignore what you did.
LockOnGuy (2023-06-22 19:46:26+00:00): Hi, again, I did not delete correct names, I only deleted wrong names which is self advertising, then I added the corrected names according to my knowledge and with the language I’m familiar with, which is an official language of the country and the Kurdistan region. If there were any names in another languages that were deleted/replaced previously by someone, then maybe you should contact them and comment on their changeset as they were the one who did the changeset.     
Regards.
ڕاستی (2023-06-26 21:28:26+00:00): You are ignoring you did some incorrect edits. Next time do not edit something your are sure about because it wasting effort and our time.  For next time contact me for bad edit because you are not live and do not know what is going here.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137508568
ڕاستی (2023-06-26 21:30:29+00:00): If there were any bad edits just revert it do not delete things and leave it. It is wasting effort and time, because someone should re-inter the information again.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137508568
LockOnGuy (2023-06-26 21:50:02+00:00): Can you please specify what you are not satisfied with? you said "you did some incorrect edits" please mention them, give examples so I can help you if you need help, or if there was actually something wrong on the map.   
You said "If there were any bad edits just revert it do not delete things and leave it." The first thing you must understand is that the editors here in OSM edit what they see on map, and most of them do not review the history of each way in order to know if there was a language tag deleted several months ago or not. Especially if this is the case, someone added the name of his shop on the roads, I deleted the vandal name and added the official name that I know, and in the language I'm familiar with, and in this case it was an official language by law in the Republic of Iraq and in the Kurdistan region, as I explained to you previously and commented the link above.
And about the "#REVIEWED_BAD" thing you did, it's false as you did previously in other changesets of mine, like changeset 127389768 and changest 127330628 etc...     
Please don't be annoying, hostile or stubborn, try to communicate and be kind.     
Best Regards.
urbalazs (2023-06-27 18:17:49+00:00): Szia Narvik2! Visszavontam ezt a módosításcsomagot, mert a lépcsőnek nem az a neve, mint ami a belinkelt rendeletben szerepel. Sajnos a rendelet tele van hibás utcanevekkel, például se a Fehérhegyi lépcső, se a Péter Pál utca, se a Stáció lépcső nem létezik ilyen néven, és nem szerepelnek a hivatalos budapesti közterületnév-jegyzékben sem. Kérlek, hogy legközelebb győződj meg arról a helyszínen, hogy mi az utca, lépcső neve, illetve hogy mi van kitáblázva.
Linkid (2023-06-22 07:24:30+00:00): Bonjour.
Merci pour cette contribution ! Pourrions-nous avoir plus d'informations sur ces corrections, s'il vous plaît ?
Merci encore :)
Alexandre_Vis (2023-06-22 07:33:02+00:00): J'ai corriger des problèmes de l'onglet problème, (noeud trop proches, valeurs plus à jour ...)
gscscnd (2023-06-19 17:18:43+00:00): Nowa ścieżka wygląda OK, brakuje tylko połączenia ze ścieżkami <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1037712547> i <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/336902736>, i wspólnego punktu z torem <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242281810> (zakładając, że tor jeszcze istnieje).

Co do usuniętego fragmentu: jeśli te drogi/ścieżki istnieją w rzeczywistości, to na OSM też powinny. Ogrodzenie można narysować, do odpowiednich fragmentów można dodać ograniczenia dostępu (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access).
gscscnd (2023-06-20 09:15:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2535215
Według tej uwagi tor nie istnieje.
nurdafur (2023-06-30 17:22:27+00:00): Hi Raud404

I just discovered that in this changeset you changed the correct highway=path to the wrong highway=cycleway.
If there is the sign 263 or 263-1 (see https://www.linker.ch/eigenlink/verkehrsschilder_verkehrszeichen.htm ) on the ground than the correct mapping is highway=path foot=designated bicycle=designated segregated=yes/no

Cheers and have fun mapping
Urs
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-07-12 19:23:54+00:00): This place has been removed, please be careful before adding random places to the map
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2023-07-13 07:05:08+00:00): Hi,
I just corrected my point, sorry that was a mistake in my coordinates.

Have a good day.
Adrien
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-07-13 15:48:00+00:00): Thank you
Loop120 (2023-07-02 12:44:15+00:00): Hello! Teatro alla Scala is already mapped, take a look here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6552704
Der Bierpuncheur (2023-06-19 09:45:19+00:00): Please @Thierry1030 and @bxl-forever, review the changes. Now that the cycle paths are finished, I've attempted to correct their positions (and add additional spurs that were built). The intersection of the roads will need further updating once the construction is complete.
Langlaeufer (2023-06-19 13:33:50+00:00): Ich hab die Querung mal als informal eingetragen, oder gibt es dort irgendetwas das auf eine offizielle querung hinweist
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137509830
Godik (2023-06-19 14:18:42+00:00): Alles klar, danke! Etwas weiter südlich ist eine ähnliche Querung, die könnte man dann auch als informal Tagen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137509830
Langlaeufer (2023-06-19 14:32:55+00:00): Den Weg gibt es nicht - das sollte der Zugang zum Fahrstuhl sein.
Es fehlten somit die Verbindungen vom Fußweg zu den Treppen und Fahrstühlen, dann kann das Routing nicht funktionieren.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137509830
Famlam (2023-07-10 17:07:06+00:00): Dag Noah, bestaat dit pad fysiek niet meer?

Als het pad nog wel bestaat, mag dit niet uit OSM verwijderd worden. Afsluitingen worden met andere tags aangegeven.
Noah Reijnen (2023-07-10 17:37:43+00:00): Beste Famlam,

Het pad is daadwerkelijk definitief gesloten + wordt binnenkort 'weggehaald'
GEO ECLA (2023-06-27 14:05:13+00:00): Bonjour Julien,
Un chemin qui devient une route ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137511128
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-19 10:30:14+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242490124

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
merylstreet (2023-06-27 21:03:15+00:00): Hello Snusmumriken, just went to this area today and saw that the real estate agent Les 2 Quais still exists (node 8823598818), are you sure it wasn't just closed during the day you surveyed?
Snusmumriken (2023-06-27 21:49:22+00:00): I'll have a look later in the week
Snusmumriken (2023-06-29 12:49:37+00:00): You were correct. I'll restore it
Taya_S (2023-06-20 04:42:20+00:00): hallo Jamie,

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Tip: in nederland voegen we informatie niet toe aan het gebouwe zelf, maar aan de bijbehoorende adresnode. 
Is ondertussen al verplaatst door iemand anders hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137520615

Groeten,
Taya
euroPathfinder (2023-06-21 11:24:40+00:00): Hey Ravelfotos,
Vielen Dank für Deinen Beitrag und willkommen bei OSM! Hier noch ein Tipp: für Deine Edits verwendest Du iD als Editor. Wenn Du dort eine rechteckige Form erstellt hast kannst Du die Taste Q drücken, dann wird die Form automatisch in ein perfekt rechtwinkliges Rechteck gewandelt.

Beste Grüße
euroPathfinder
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137513463
ivanbranco (2023-06-19 16:48:05+00:00): Ciao Andrea,

benvenuto su OSM!
mi permetto di spiegarti una particolarità del tag building=*, questo viene usato per l'uso originario di un edificio. Per esempio se una chiesa sconsacrata viene utilizzata come casa, non va cambiato da building=church a building=house, perché essendo stata costruita come chiesa è quello il suo uso originario. Per l'uso attuale si usa un altro tag che è building:use=*.

In questo caso, se è nato come edificio pubblico e ora è occupato da uffici, il tagging sarebbe dovuto essere building=public+building:use=commercial

comunque grazie per l'edit e buon mapping :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-01 11:17:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110520267 - if building is named (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10979393516/history has building:name) then maybe name tag should go on building?

If that is an address part - then addr:housename would likely fit better
The_Wanderer (2024-05-01 16:03:02+00:00): The building has 4 entrances to 4 separate two-storey-apartments. The apartment in question has two names: 901 and Villa Vicaria. I don't think that the name of one of four apartments should be tagged onto the building.
Postal address is probably 901 (or 85 901).
user_14538650 (2023-06-19 13:28:29+00:00): ê, nhớ để lại comment nhé
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-19 11:30:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1027192038

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
black_flag_baby (2023-06-19 11:59:46+00:00): Poprawione w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137515546
Bierphysik (2024-05-02 09:31:38+00:00): Existiert der Path wirklich so? also so grade? Hattest du den  mit GPS Daten aufgenommen? Auf Luftbildern sehe ich den nirgendwo., auch nicht im Ansatz...
Isa98 (2024-05-02 09:56:45+00:00): Well, yes this patch exists in reality. I can even see it on the right aerial photos. If there is a way in this portal, I could send you a copy. Problem is that too many users here rely on aerial photos instead of having insight in the reality on the ground.
Bierphysik (2024-05-05 07:44:56+00:00): you can upload the gps track to osm, anonymize it even, then one could see  tha data.
Bierphysik (2024-05-05 07:45:51+00:00): i just found the straightness for a highway=path on this length rather surprising. ususally paths are much more "curvy"
mavl (2023-06-20 11:00:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137557405 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137539704].
mavl (2023-06-20 11:00:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137557405 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137539704].
rarad74 (2023-06-19 20:01:23+00:00): The value 7.5 is correct value too. You can choose between these two formats in ID editor for example and is not forbidden to use only numeric value. All street signs  from Romania is without t. So please do not change again this here.
nslxndr (2023-06-20 04:42:08+00:00): Yes, you have right, the value 7.5 (without unit, implicit t unit) would be a correct value as is the value 7.5 t (explicit unit t with space separator) too. But previous value was 7.5t (explicit unit t, **without space separator**), which is a mistake regardless of street signs or what iD editor does (may be a bug if suggests different format). The consumer route planner softwares for working properly requires the format documented in the wiki, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features/Units#Common_mistakes, I intended to fix only those. So please check again the diff about what I changed and verify the wiki. If Romania requires custom format anyway, feel free to document in the wiki (also worth to read the the wiki about maxweight key first) and bring that page to my attention.
HansWesterback (2023-06-23 08:32:47+00:00): I Stockholm stavas Gata med versal, enligt både NVDB och Lantmäteriet, därför uppdaterade jag till versal på alla jag hittade i vintras
nzit2 (2023-06-23 08:40:30+00:00): Gäller det för Stockholms kommun, Stockholms län eller Stockholms innerstad? Kan du länka mig till resurserna?
HansWesterback (2023-06-23 08:59:25+00:00): Verkar gälla Stockholms och Göteborgs kommuner.
Snabb googling ger t ex:

https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatunamn_i_Stockholm

https://www.pressreader.com/sweden/spraktidningen/20150624/282187944640662

https://www.svd.se/a/b5d19990-dc0d-3371-9e2a-85fdf1b107a9/krokig-vag-till-gators-stavning
HansWesterback (2023-06-23 09:02:07+00:00): Plus förstås bara kolla i 
https://nvdb2012.trafikverket.se/SeTransportnatverket
och
https://minkarta.lantmateriet.se/
nzit2 (2023-06-23 11:02:32+00:00): Jag är övertalad även om det gör ont, och jag hellre skulle avvika från reglerna med motivationen att jag skulle gissa att versalerna är för gatuskyltarnas estetik, men datamässigt skulle det lika gärna kunna vara konsekvent, men nu är det dessutom så att källdatan använder versaler.

Något att beakta är att SL inte alltid (eller aldrig?) följer stockholmsversalreglerna med sina hållplatsnamn, t.ex. "Doktor Widerströms gata" även om gatan heter "Doktor Widerströms Gata" i NVDB. Så hållplatser antar jag ska använda gemener.

Om du har ett enkelt sätt att återställa mina namnändringar får du gärna göra det, annars kan jag försöka lista ut det också.
nzit2 (2023-06-23 11:03:00+00:00): Jag är även tacksam för tips om hur man återställer en ändring.
HansWesterback (2023-06-23 11:36:20+00:00): Tyvärr är jag ganska rookie, så jag vet inte hur man gör det. Kan vara idé fråga i FB-gruppen där vet jag det finns dom som kan
nzit2 (2023-06-23 12:35:14+00:00): Återställt via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137687250 och https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137684433
mavl (2023-06-20 11:00:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137557405 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137539704].