piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
yzal (2023-05-30 15:14:04+00:00): Dobrý deň, zmeny na evanjelickom kostole na tajovského ulici vrátim do pôvodného stavu. Neviem či úmyselne, neznalosťou mapovania, alebo to je vec editoru ID (ten v prehliadači čo používate), ale pri úpravách vzniklo viac chýb ako úžitku. Napríklad je tam nastavené že celý kostol je zo skla.

Ten kostol bol zaznačený už dávno ako "relácia". Pri tej sa označuje obrys (člen relácie outline) na ktorom sú všetky značky spoločné pre všetky časti kostola. Ďalej sú v relácií časti (člen relácie part) na ktorých sú len značky špecifické pre danú člen. (v tomto prípade sú to výškové hodnoty jednotlivých častí pomocou ktorých sa dá urobiť 3D render kostola). Toto všetko bolo úpravami zničené a bol vytvorený takzvaný multipoligon (a aj ten nesprávne). Viac info o reláciach napríklad tu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Relace#Typy_relac%C3%AD

Preto by bolo vhodné, sa niektorým veciam vyhnúť, alebo si doštudovať ich úpravy, aby nevznikali ďalšie škody. 

Tu je obrázok z editoru ID https://imgur.com/a/WYBSAeM keď si rozkliknete pôvodnú reláciu a vyberiete člena outline tak tam sa dávajú značky ktoré sa upravujú.

Do značky "name" sa nepoužívajú všeobecné názvy ako napríklad kostol, potraviny a podobne. Do "name" patrí oficiálny názov ktorý je uvedený na nejakej ceduli. Pri kostoloch napr "najsvätejšej trojice" pri potravinách napr "Lidl". Viac o značke name https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:N%C3%A1zvy
Matthew Hostak (2023-05-30 15:19:05+00:00): OK, dakujem za info, toto bolo asi nad moje sily
ygcgjp5 (2023-06-05 10:20:21+00:00): Ar čia iš tikrųjų yra atskirai suženklinta, jog pėstiesies eiti draudžiama, ar tiesiog bandoma „pataisyti“ lievą maršrutizatorių? Maršrutizatorių problemos yra taisomos maršrutizatorių algoritme, o ne žemėlapyje.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-30 14:06:37+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10936755344/history has shop = garage that was added in this edit
shop=garage ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=car_repair ? Or maybe it is fuel station? Or selling car parts? Or something else car adjacent? Maybe even building=garage was intended and it is just place to store a car? Or place where they sell prefabricated garages?
segubi (2023-09-02 13:47:26+00:00): Ich hoffe, Du bist einverstanden, dass ich überall bei direction_* (Fzs.) in (Fzs) ändere, damit es mit den anderen Logos vereinheitlicht wird? Ich ändere das Wiki auch. (n.b.: die Uneinheitlichkeit habe ich letztlich verbockt...). Faktisch steht es im Moment in Deutschland 40 Wegweiser mit (Fzs.) gegen 127 mit (Fzs), das ist für mich dabei auch ausschlaggebend. Ich würde die Änderung heute Abend umsetzen.
nurdafur (2023-09-04 21:27:15+00:00): Hallo segubi

Ich war fast 2 Wochen komplett offline. Von mir aus kann der Punkt sehr wohl weg. Ich werde das künftig so handhaben.
Grüße
Kento Kei (2023-05-29 17:38:24+00:00): Can you give any notes on why the city hall was deleted?
Kento Kei (2023-05-29 17:48:33+00:00): Kind of stupid on my part, after looking at the website for Roxana, found a newsletter that had the address of the new village hall in it
Vika_Nosovich (2023-05-30 16:12:31+00:00): Hello, Kento Kei!

Please let me know if you have information about the presence of The City Hall here. If so I will revert my edit as incorrect.

Best regards, Vika.
lipuma (2023-05-31 11:06:50+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM!

The way you edited in this changeset got two similar tags:

highway = trunk
hingway = unclassified

Which one did you mean to put on this way?

---

Translated to Russian - Переведено на русский язык:

Привет, добро пожаловать в OSM!

В результате вашего редактирования в этом наборе изменений получилось два похожих тега:

highway = trunk
hingway = unclassified

Какой из них вы хотели поставить на этот путь?
user_6110846 (2023-05-29 12:41:00+00:00): https://1drv.ms/b/s!Ar-WXIFaX7UdgQuO6WpVrTr6YYsQ?e=QYfcqP
mavl (2024-11-13 10:14:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159083843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
willkmis (2023-05-30 01:20:58+00:00): Hello,
Why was the building tag removed from this way? It appears to be a building.

Best,
Will
Com_Rak (2023-06-07 16:32:32+00:00): Hi Will, I Thank you for your feedback and I apologize for the delayed response.  I misinterpreted the imagery here and incorrectly removed the building tag.  I have now restored the tag.
CjMalone (2023-05-29 14:36:14+00:00): If this is closed is shouldn't still have `amenity=bank` on it.

`disused:amenity=bank` for a vacant location, or if it's turned residential it shouldn't have a `amenity` tag at all.
TheUKHighStreet (2023-05-29 15:14:15+00:00): That's why I added a note to ask whether it was vacant. I've removed the amenity tag.
emersonveenstra (2023-05-29 13:49:20+00:00): Hi,

Can you please share your source for adding stars=2.5 to this hotel?
Константин Гам (2024-03-19 09:59:51+00:00): В тоннеле не обнаружен знак "Движение на велосипеде разрешено", однако вы поставили bicycle=yes . Пожалуйста, не надо так.
bora can (2023-07-03 15:26:40+00:00): Askeriye gerçekten taşındı mı?
mkaradeniz (2023-07-03 17:56:38+00:00): evet seneler oluyor tasinali
phodgkin (2025-08-25 12:22:37+00:00): I've been able to complete the Wall Trail thanks to an old leaflet I found at home + a survey. These routes (which date from the 1990s) are much decayed, and only work if you have the leaflets (which I can't find online) - they don't link to information panels en route. To be honest, I would delete the fragments of the other trails and leave them to rest in peace. Paul H.
LivingWithDragons (2025-08-25 12:33:48+00:00): If there are still way markers in the ground, I think it is still valuable to have them mapped. It can show how "decayed" there are, and could help people find the sections.
ivanbranco (2023-05-30 13:59:31+00:00): Ciao Michele,

come mai hai eliminato il civico da questo nodo e dai 3 nodi vicini?
pio2_122 (2023-05-29 14:08:52+00:00): W dalszym ciągu korzystasz wyłącznie z danych z budynki.openstreetmap.org.pl.

Adresacja ofiycyn w Szczecinie wymaga sprawdzenia w terenie ze względu na rozbieżności pomiędzy miejskim serwisem geoportal.szczecin.eu a danymi z PRG (na których bazuje budynki.openstreetmap.org.pl). Warto zaznaczyć, że w tym przypadku nie ma jednoznacznych odpowiedników między adresami z obu tych źródeł, ponieważ formy w PRG to [numer]-oficyna, [numer]-oficyny, [numer]-oficyna prawa i [numer]-oficyna lewa, natomiast w  miejskim geoportalu to tylko [numer]-of i [numer]-ofof.

Wspomniana wyżej weryfikacja jest mocno utrudniona ze względu na specyfikę oficyn, tj. są to budynki stojące za kamienicą frontową, więc aby się do nich dostać trzeba najpierw przejść przez bramę kamienicy, do której dostęp mają zwykle tylko mieszkańcy.
Podczas dyskusji na OSM-forum, jeden z użytkowników wspomniał, że widział zdjęcie takiego budynku, gdzie na tabliczce była wersja skrócona: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/prosba-o-import-adresow/66800/521.

Stąd, do czasu zweryfikowania chociaż kilku miejsc, w OSM adresacja pozostała w takim schemacie.
Dalkvist (2023-06-01 08:53:47+00:00): Hi, beware that Kiruna is moving parts of the town and lots of buildings and roads in the Western and Southern part is being rerouted, moved, or demolished.
Only using heat maps and Imagery is not recommend, without local knowledge.
kagebar (2023-05-29 16:01:00+00:00): Наскільки я розумію, дорога що ви позначили (1177242382, v1) є продовженням відгалуження яке я позначив раніше, і яке ви видалили (похибка на точність gps) (1177218428, v2). В таких випадках, краще не видаляйте обєкти, а змінюйте їх положення так як рахуєте вірно, бо з видаленням обєкту втрачається вся історя змін.
Pseudoplatanus (2023-05-29 18:42:41+00:00): Дякую, прийняв до уваги.
74523978 (2023-06-26 12:06:53+00:00): Ondanks meerdere waarschuwingen importeer je nog steeds gebouwen waarvan de bouw bij lange na niet is gestart. Verwijder a.u.b. het onterecht toegevoegde. Je laat mij geen andere keus dan een topic op het forum te starten m.b.t. dit gedrag.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-29 13:10:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Wichrowe wzgórza":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10936890952
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10936891050
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10936891101
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10936891312
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10936891361

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
aceman444 (2023-05-29 16:37:12+00:00): Is the name "Pamätník holokaustu" written on the memorial, or is it in some reliable source? If not, such a subjective description does not belong into the 'name' tag.
Similarly, is the "Equine Statue" (in English) the official name of the statue in Slovakia?
Matthew Hostak (2023-05-29 16:47:20+00:00): You can see the memorial plate eg. here https://www.google.sk/maps/@48.2878768,17.7244851,3a,37.9y,34.74h,77.96t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1snI0eDUVFHmCXuh3VKZ8Gpg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu

The statue has no official name AFAIK but this is its name on Google Maps and it is in fact a statue of a horse so I don't know, could that be the name? If you don't think so I can remove it, I do not care in particular one way or the other ...
aceman444 (2023-05-29 20:36:30+00:00): I see no name on the memorial from the photo. An object does not need to have a name in OSM, this is no Google maps. Instead you could have put the inscription text into the 'inscription' tag.

You cannot copy anything from Google maps as it is forbidden for OSM. Second, Google is a dump ground of random descriptions of objects put into names so it even is useless to copy anything from Google maps.

You must check the history of the objects in OSM you change. Here you would see that multiple people already tagged it that they do not know its name. A statue of a horse is a description or property of the object and can be described by proper tags (see e.g. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:statue), it is not its name. If there is indeed no name, there is a noname=yes tag for that.

Then I ask where does the name on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10936899407 come from?
Matthew Hostak (2023-05-29 20:51:57+00:00): Hi, yes I'm very well aware of the fact that Google Maps is a mess (I fixed some stuff there myself) but I was not aware that you require such a positive proof of names etc. I will refrain of naming things unless it's really explicit Thanks
aceman444 (2023-05-30 14:06:15+00:00): Thanks, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Also note that Google street view is forbidden to be used for OSM, so only add objects you have visited, or are visible in the allowed aerial imagery in your editor).

For the memorials and atworks, there are tags that can be used instead of putting a description into the name.
E.g. for the horse statue at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3827143367 I have added statue=animal  (see e.g. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:statue) and artwork_subject=horse (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:artwork_subject, looks like 'figurative' would be more proper value). Sometimes it is good to put the description into 'description' tag if tags cannot express the object fully yet, but maybe in future tags will become available (new ones are created /agreed upon constantly).
Matthew Hostak (2023-05-30 14:50:05+00:00): Yeah, OK, thanks for the info. Yes, I do physically visit everything, Google Maps is a total mess...
ТатьянаC (2023-05-29 23:27:25+00:00): когда вы портите карту, ко всем вносимым изменениям вашим уже нет веры!
Carto'Cité (2023-08-11 13:26:30+00:00): Salut Noémie,
J'ai repassé certains chemins en path car il s'agit de voies vertes avec la signalétique C115. N’hésite pas à me dire si tu as des remarques sur ces contributions 🙂
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Carto'Cité (2023-08-11 13:32:09+00:00): J'ai aussi remis ce chemin path car il a bien un panneau C115 :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111991360
nlehuby (2023-08-17 14:02:55+00:00): Salut Charles,

La doc est peut-être à mettre à jour. Voilà ce qu'on lit sur la page de highway=path :
"Cet attribut est utilisé pour les voies où highway=footway/cycleway/bridleway ne seraient pas appropriés ou inadéquats (ou simplement insuffisants), mais qui toutefois restent utilisables pour les déplacements. (...) En milieu urbain, il est préférable d’utiliser highway=footway (avec bicycle=yes si nécessaire)"

source : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway=path

Je ne vois pas bien pourquoi il serait inapproprié d'utiliser highway=cycleway sur un chemin qui s'appelle "Piste Cyclable Cours des Lacs" ...
Carto'Cité (2023-08-28 08:24:10+00:00): Salut Noémie,
Oui tes raisons sont entendables. Disons que là on est sur des tendances et des pratiques qui se sont consolidées autour des voies vertes avec une signalétique pour utiliser path quand il s'agit de voies vertes, sauf cas particuliers. C'est sur la page dédiée à la description des aménagements cyclables : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Voies_vertes mais ce n'est pas le premier cas contradictoire. Sinon c'est aussi la pratique observée par la plupart des « gros contributeurs » qui contribuent sur la thématique aménagements cyclables.
La tendance est d'utilier highway=cycleway essentiellement pour les axes avec une signalétique explicite pour le vélo : B22a et C113 car ce sont les seules signalétiques qui introduisent une piste cyclable en France au sens légal du terme ; bon j'avoue que je n'étais pas fan de cette approche, essentiellement défendue par les militants cyclistes mais elle est assez entendable quand tu essayes de rationaliser la description des aménagements partout en France avec que des cas particuliers en ambiguës ; c'est aussi pour ça que l'utilisation de highway=path a énormément augmenté. Il y avait eu des débats similaires pour les highway=footway qui avaient été un peu tranchés au SotMFr de Bordeaux de mémoire mais je n'ai jamais réussi à retrouver de compte rendu :(
À ta dispo pour en discuter.
Charles
highflyer74 (2023-05-29 13:51:19+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Please note that both the POIs you added here are already existing in OSM and therefore have been removed again. Please update your map data, or (even better) use another app. Maps.me is not being developed anymore and is causing a lot of problems in OSM.

Thank you!
hrhino (2023-05-29 14:19:02+00:00): May I also recommend that you close changesets before moving to another geographical location? The way OSM works, the bounding box of this changeset reaches Canada, Mexico, Niger, and Denmark.

Thanks, and welcome to OSM!!
felipeeugenio (2023-05-30 19:42:21+00:00): Hola.

Las calles tienen nombres dentro del Taller?

ojo por favor con la geometría, borró una calle perfectamente dibujada de cuajo para agregarla otra vez con una geometría de inferior calidad, pero con unos metros más.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136700383
Camilo Nuñez Castro (2023-05-30 19:57:14+00:00): Positivo, el interior del taller mantiene nombre de calles, se ingresó los nombres a los edificios respectivos y se extendió calle hasta el acceso posterior que está regulado por un guardia de seguridad.

(Verificado de manera presencial tras visita por el día del patrimonio)
felipeeugenio (2023-05-30 20:17:21+00:00): ok, gracias
Dimitar155 (2023-05-30 05:03:18+00:00): Здравей,

Тези улици не съществуват според снимките на Esri (които са по-актуални от тези на Bing). В такива случаи може да им сложиш razed:highway или директно да ги изтриеш.

Поздрави,
Митко
emersonveenstra (2023-05-30 11:22:32+00:00): Hi,

In the future, please remove the noexit tag from the node after connecting the two ways, as nodes with noexit cannot be connected to multiple ways
thefabi (2023-05-31 18:23:27+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your feedback, I will keep it in mind for future edits.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-29 13:30:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10936927183
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10936927691

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-05-29 13:37:00+00:00): see:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136537632
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-29 13:45:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136701590 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscused mechanical edits.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7150
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-29 13:45:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136701590 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscused mechanical edits.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7150
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-29 13:45:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136701590 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscused mechanical edits.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7150
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-29 13:45:46+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 136701189, 136701213, 136701232, 136701252, 136701312.
user_3022894 (2023-06-28 18:59:52+00:00): Hallo Christoph,

kurz zu der Telefonsäule hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4066879144/history

Ich hatte die mit disused:amenity=telephone markiert, da sie nicht mehr nutzbar ist. 
Die Deutsche Telekom hat alle ihre öffentlichen Telefone zum 1. Februar 2023 ausnahmslos abgeschaltet.

Das Telefon existiert noch, ja, aber es funktioniert nicht mehr. (Im Display wird angezeigt: "Entschuldigung, zur Zeit gestört").
Daher hatte ich es als disused markiert.

Mglw. war dir das entgangen.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-26 08:01:00+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6072007585/history has building = pharmacy that was added in this edit
is it an attempt to map amenity=pharmacy ? How building constructed for pharmacy would be meaningfully distinct from other building=retail ?
Hidoo00 (2023-06-03 12:43:46+00:00): Hi,

On this building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1177251834 you added a buildin:type=Romney. I assume you were intending of writing building:type, but that's deprecated in favour of just building, which however also is tagged. Perhaps building=romney, which has a few uses in the Netherlands would be a better tag?

Best regards,
Hidoo
literan (2023-05-29 17:04:13+00:00): Лихоборы - грузовая станция, а не пассажирская, поэтому не надо добавлять туда тег public_transport=station
Tom Telman (2023-07-29 18:57:31+00:00): Странно. Там же пассажиркую платформу строили. Где и переходы там есть.
literan (2023-07-30 11:36:08+00:00): вот она, пассажирская платформа, и там этот тег уже стоит https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4379061179

там, где положено, на точке пассажирского остановочного пункта.
GinaroZ (2023-05-29 22:12:21+00:00): This edit has been reverted, however I've readded the changes to the exchange.
You have moved a number of buildings and roads which wasn't necessary as they were correctly mapped - the Bing imagery is slightly offset here. Please turn on the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels layer to help with alignment in future :)
BarryMyles (2023-05-29 22:23:22+00:00): Yep, oops. Have mostly used iD up until now, but trying very hard to get on with JOSM. Always did the Cadastral alignment bit with iD, but hadn't thought to do it with JOSM. Will do that in future. Thanks for fixing my clumsy edit.
GinaroZ (2023-05-30 16:45:06+00:00): No worries, didn't know if you were aware :)
BTW there's a note here which you might be able to help with if you're sorting the exchanges
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3562328
BarryMyles (2023-05-30 20:51:39+00:00): Yep, thanks for pointing out that note. Following a rulemaking exercise under sections 48A and 80A of the Communications Act by Ofcom in 2019, Openreach are indeed responsible for all telephone exchange buildings in the country. This was done so that BT could not avoid the regulatory requirements of the Communications Act. I'll reply to it.
SK53 (2023-06-02 10:47:31+00:00): Barry, This may be a good candidate for a rule in the Name Suggestion Index (e.g., https://nsi.guide/?t=brands) which would enable other editors to add the correct operator.

Jerry aka SK53
GinaroZ (2023-06-02 11:06:26+00:00): It's already in NSI https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=operators&k=telecom&v=exchange#openreach-ef19df
jmapb (2023-06-02 15:55:27+00:00): Hi bedouin_88, welcome back to OSM!

Fellow Kingston mapper here... l saw some of the restrictions you added on Ulster Ave and I'm a little confused. Can you explain what you're working on here?

Thanks, jmapb
bedouin_88 (2023-06-02 16:18:09+00:00): Hello! 
Yes, I was trying to show where the road is divided by a painted median and to reflect where turns are permitted. I apologize if anything is unclear! Any feedback is much appreciated. 

Best,
J
jmapb (2023-06-02 18:38:03+00:00): Ok, I guess the big question is whether Ulster Ave should be split into a dual carriageway... Generally we only do this is there's a physical divider of some kind, not just road paint. (See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway .)

If it *is* valid to map as dual carriageway (I was on Ulster Ave on Wednesday & I'm appalled that I can't remember!) then that has a lot of impact on what turn restrictions are necessary where. Eg, this only_right_turn that I added at the exit from Kings Mall:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14697083 ... it was useful when Ulster Ave was two-way, but exiting onto a one-way road it's redundant.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14697154 is even worse... it made sense when I added it, but now it applies to traffic traveling south in the northbound lanes, so it's completely meaningless.

There are also implications to the bus route relations... eg see how this bus route now jumps between the northbound and southbound lanes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12678504#map=18/41.96173/-73.99022
bedouin_88 (2023-06-02 20:33:23+00:00): quite reasonable after reviewing the documentation you provided. I erred in separating it as such. Thank you for checking it out and I will make an effort to check the documentation more thoroughly before making any changes like this and flag any changes for review.
bedouin_88 (2023-06-02 20:54:07+00:00): Could you provide assistance with reverting these changes?
jmapb (2023-06-02 22:09:54+00:00): Yeah I was gonna suggest that.... let me take a stab ;)
jmapb (2023-06-03 14:19:45+00:00): Ok I *think* I managed to unsplit those roads without undoing any of the other work. The bus routes still have problems, but they did before too, so no big change there.

...It's from a different changeset ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136673392 ) but I was also wondering about this gate sitting in the middle of Lawrenceville Street: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10934511170
bedouin_88 (2023-06-05 11:39:35+00:00): It is for a foot path that connects to the street there. Is there a better way to indicate? Thanks!
jmapb (2023-06-05 20:02:46+00:00): Gotcha -- yeah, better to put it just on the path, not directly touching Lawrenceville. As it is now, it looks like traffic driving along Lawrenceville has to pass through that gate as well.