piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mazda05 (2025-05-30 12:48:38+00:00): Доброго дня.

Тег access=no згідно з описом у вікі osm.wiki/Key:access позначає не тількі чи відкрит об'єкт, чи ні, а перш за все легальність користування об'єктом чи доступу к об'єкту.

Згідно протокольного рішення Кабінету Міністрів України від 05.06.2014 "Щодо припинення руху через деякі пункти пропуску на кордоні з Російською Федерацією" рух через пункт пропуску "Довжанський" тимчасово припинено та, станом на зараз, 30.05.2025, рух не відновлено.

Суверінетет України щодо цієї ділянки території підтверджується діючим ти чинним на сьогодні з обох сторін міжнародним договором "Договір між Україною і Російською Федерацією про українсько-російський державний кордон" / "Договор между Украиной и Российской Федерацией об украинско-российской государственной границе" від 28.01.2003, який діє з 23.04.2004 дотепер (точки 1230 osm.org/node/337510022 та 1231 osm.org/node/12115460875).

Згідно законодавства України, перетин державного кордону поза пунктів пропуску, що відкриті, кваліфікується як адміністративне правопорушення, зокрема за статтями 204-1, 204-2, 204-3, 204-4, 206-1, або як кримінальний злочин, зокрема за статтями 258-6, 332, 332-1, 332-2, які безпосередньо стосуються перетину державного кордону. Це є достатнім, щоб вважати, що access=no позначенний на highway=* в пункті пропуску та до державного кордону є найбільш відповідним, згідно з описом на wiki osm.wiki/Tag:access=no зокрема за "This tag is a proper method to mark existing objects such as path as existing but illegal to use. It includes illegal railway crossings, illegal paths through nature reserves etc. Such objects can be mapped but should be tagged as illegal to use by adding access=no.".

З 05.06.2014 і дотепер перетин державного кордону поза пунктів пропуску, що відкриті, не був дозволеній за законодавством.

Фізична можливість проїзду по дорозі позначена пов'язаністю лінійних об'єктів (way) highway=* між собою згідно рекомендації osm.wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground.

Згідно нечисленних правил OSM osm.wiki/How_We_Map, дані повинні бути правдивими (рішення КМУ 05.06.2014 дійсно є та діє) та підтвердженними (наведена інформація щодо рішення КМУ 05.06.2014, підтверджено суверенітет України міжнародним договором на цій ділянці, наведена причина нелегальності користування шляхами, що обговорюються).

Зважаючи на вищезазначене, прошу утриматись від подальших змін значення тегу access в пунктах пропуску через державний кордон там, де рух тимчасово припинений.
stillhart (2025-05-30 11:46:02+00:00): 🤩 so fast
NeisBot (2025-05-29 17:45:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-05-30 07:01:10+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/166936493
StreetSurveyor (2025-05-30 00:25:30+00:00): I'm not sure why you felt compelled to make this change. It's not according to the RI guidelines. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rhode_Island/Highway_classification
Joseph R P (2025-05-30 00:35:31+00:00): Where's it say in the page that this section should be a dead-end trunk route?
StreetSurveyor (2025-05-30 00:42:23+00:00): Where does it say where the trunk ends/primary begins?
Joseph R P (2025-05-30 00:56:34+00:00): You got me, let's tag the rest of the roadways on Aquidneck Island to trunk while we're at it, just because the page doesn't say not to.

It should be assumed that the trunk route begins/end where the route transitions into another of the same importance because roads are classified based on importance. The trunk route that links Newport to Fall River is described on the Wiki page as 'RI-114 / RI-24 / MA-24'. This means that it should follow Route 114 up to Route 24. You could make an argument that that's vague, as it could mean any section of Route 114, but the roads you tagged as trunk do not link Fall River and Newport. They are not part of the intended trunk route. 

You keep saying that these edits are based on your 'survey' but that could mean anything, and doesn't provide a real explanation for why you are making these edits.
Joseph R P (2025-05-30 00:58:09+00:00): You also provide osm.wiki/Rhode_Island/Highway_classification as a source for your edits, so I have to ask, what exact piece of information within the article are you basing these changes on?
StreetSurveyor (2025-05-30 01:10:30+00:00): Ok.  I do see your points and appreciate the information. I struggled with labeling these roads as primary because of how fast drivers travel on them. Some of these RI roads fall into a "gray" category where there's not a lot of solid data on what roads even qualify for primary. Thanks for the info.
Joseph R P (2025-05-30 01:28:25+00:00): I will add on that roads aren't usually classified based particularly on their speed limits or drivers ignoring the speed limit, but rather a connectivity factor, primarily, and these justifications will normally be documented on a state-by-state basis as a result of community consensus. Thank you much for your understanding.
Frans S (2025-05-31 10:25:26+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
This object is not a building.
What you see is a fenced cattle yard. 
You see no roof but a wall on the inside as well as the outside.
Best regards
Udarian (2025-05-29 19:12:26+00:00): the horse=no is seemingly correct as I doubt that horses are allowed in this area, that tag is seemingly implied so honestly should have been removed.
Frans S (2025-06-01 12:28:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Some structures show only walls. You can see the shadow on both the inside and outside . These are no buildings. More a cattle yard.
Best regards
NeisBot (2025-05-29 18:01:35+00:00): Hi bhavikaparmar, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 80% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 470 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=166936223
bhavikaparmar (2025-05-29 18:11:02+00:00): There are duplicate buildings in that area, so I am deleting that
NeisReview (2025-05-30 06:20:04+00:00): 👍 Thank you for your map updates.

#HappyMapping
Frans S (2025-06-03 08:08:30+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166936413
Soshal Distan Singh (2025-05-29 18:11:47+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:landuse%3Dallotments

"Обратите внимание, что этот тег отображает реальное землепользование, наблюдаемое на местности, а не формальный статус территории, поэтому территорию обильно "обжитого" СНТ корректнее частично или полностью обозначить landuse=residential."
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-29 18:21:06+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440728688

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2025-05-29 18:24:35+00:00): Hi bhavikaparmar, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 96% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 122 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=166937202
bhavikaparmar (2025-05-29 18:29:12+00:00): I’m currently deleting duplicate buildings. I had already mentioned in a previous comment that 470 duplicates were removed, but I’m still seeing quite a few. I also noticed that some team members mentioned deleting duplicates earlier, but the issue still seems to persist.
NeisReview (2025-05-30 06:20:18+00:00): 👍 Thank you for your map updates.

#HappyMapping
Glassman (2025-05-30 23:02:24+00:00): FYI - you might be seeing a shift in the imagery also. In the editor, click on the background icon, then towards the bottom of the list, there is imagery offset. You can adjust the imagery to better match what is already mapped.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166937203
Stone_X (2025-06-01 10:35:54+00:00): Na mapie topograficznej (wojskowej) z 1933 r. droga już istniała, więc rok 2019 wpisany w tagu jest błędny.
C2oc4 (2025-06-04 06:01:56+00:00): Witaj. Temat dotyczmy ścieżki rowerowej/chodnika który istnieje od 2019
Stone_X (2025-06-04 19:38:30+00:00): Faktycznie. Dzięki za wyjaśnienie.
olo81 (2025-06-05 00:36:21+00:00): Nie wiem, czy ma sen dodawanie akurat tego tagu do ścieżki rowerowej. Ale błędem to nie jest.
Norbert Dichter (2025-05-29 19:30:38+00:00): Task is not finished, but your mappings looks good. 1 in the upper left corner needs squaring.

• To square the corners of buildings, select the building and type 'Q
• Using the Issues tool on the right-hand side of the iD editor helps you to check your own and other mappers’ work before exiting the task. Click the issues icon or type ‘i’ to open the menu. To find all unsquared buildings, change value to “up to 20°”.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166937597
Ken-117 (2025-05-30 07:36:31+00:00): Hello Norbert Dichter,

Appreciate the feedback, I am not aware of the issues feature.

Thank you for letting me know.
喵耳引力波 (2025-11-07 15:49:50+00:00): 建筑和用地不要完全贴在路上，比如机电楼这个 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1390774641 其实是一个用地面状要素而不是一个具体的建筑物

当然，因为目前确实是没有更好的办法，因为前几天才看到母校有新闻稿

比如 https://t.me/the_ccsn/27962 里这个（ https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/t5FOvjzRBieD_uYYiSHlQA ）

怎么说呢，看到BUCT有人接班的话说实话也确实觉得挺欣慰就是了
mcliquid (2025-06-30 10:11:11+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
edihoo (2025-07-01 11:24:46+00:00): Hi. 
Danke dir für den Hinweis.
Grundsätzlich finde ich es natürlich auch richtig, dass Änderungssätze lokal bleiben sollen, um unnötige Diskussionen und Fehler zur vermeiden.
Nun ist es aber so, dass ich viel wandern gehe und speziell Sitzbänke, die ich unterwegs direkt am Weg sehe, über Osmand hochlade.
Wer viel wandert, vor allem auch mit grossem Rucksack, weiss Sitzbänke und Rastmöglichkeiten absolut zu schätzen.
Allein auf der letzten Fernwanderung, dem Saar Hunsrück Steig, waren es 89 Sitzbänke.
Fehlinterpretationen und mögliche Diskussionen können in dem Fall auch nicht entstehen, da ich ja immer direkt vor Ort bin.

Schönen Tag noch... ;-)


Hi.
Thank you for the tip.
In principle, I also think it's right that change sets should remain local to avoid unnecessary discussions and errors.
However, I hike a lot and upload benches that I see directly along the trail via Osmand.
Anyone who hikes a lot, especially with a large backpack, absolutely appreciates benches and rest stops.
On my last long-distance hike alone, the Saar Hunsrück Steig, there were 89 benches.
Misinterpretations and potential discussions can't arise in this case, since I'm always there on site.

Have a nice day... ;-)
dypa (2025-06-15 08:57:30+00:00): При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra

Пожалуйста при внесении следующих правок используйте теги (Размеченный (нерегулируемый) пешеходный переход)
crossing=uncontrolled
crossing:markings=zebra

Заранее спасибо!
Glassman (2025-05-30 23:07:38+00:00): It looks like you mapped some of the footpaths through the building. If they go into the building, we typically just take the path to the door and mark a building entrance. If the paths go under a cover, then the covered tagged would be appropriate. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered for covered and building passage. Can you review this edit after looking at the wiki page to see what is the best approach?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166939199
Aleks-Berlin (2025-06-02 08:30:58+00:00): Hi corb555,
please use official OSM tagging. wikipedia="en:Abcd" (not http:..),
detaile can be found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Examples
Thanks, Alex
eggie (2025-05-30 13:01:16+00:00): Dag Geert 
Je vraagt feedback.. 
Lijkt me oke.
gr eggie
grzegorz75jan (2025-05-29 20:00:47+00:00): https://inpost.pl/paczkomat-sufczyn-suf01bapp-sufczyn-paczkomaty-malopolskie

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity=parcel_locker
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166939507
dentonny (2025-06-07 15:17:20+00:00): hey Eebie,

hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11513103066) is volgens mij iets mis gegaan ;-)

mvg
Baloo Uriza (2025-10-30 13:05:05+00:00): This appears to be an incomplete polygon for the Town Plaza mall, not just the doggy daycare.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166939587
Larmax (2025-06-02 11:32:33+00:00): Moi, highway=residential eli asuinkadut on tarkoitettu virallisille, lähes aina nimetyille kaduille. Highway=service eli huoltotietägiä käytetään ajoteille ja muille vastaaville kiinteistöille vieille ei-yleisille teille.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-29 19:30:46+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/949688960

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2025-05-29 19:52:35+00:00): Hi spork_in_the_road, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added a new parking space with charging facilities and updated an existing way to reflect this change."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #AIgenerated #Gibberish
dadavid (2025-05-29 21:21:30+00:00): Hi, 

Ich fand den Namen vom Schlupfloch vorher eigentlich korrekt, mEn gehören die Zusätze eher in den description tag. Wie siehts du das? :) 

Viele Grüße und weiterhin happy Mapping 

David

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#:~:text=name%20ist%20nur%20der%20Name
streetball (2025-05-30 04:19:50+00:00): Ich habe das aus der Anschrift genommen wie es auf der Webseite steht. https://www.schlupfloch-walldorf.de/

Ich gebe dir recht. Der gebräuchliche Name ist Schlupfloch ohne den Zusatz. Gleiches gilt für das neue FIRST in der Hauptstrasse 21 ein paar Meter weiter.

Aber "description" passt auch nicht wirklich für den Zusatz.
description=* - Additional information about an element, containing text not existent in real world.

Vielleicht den Zusatz weg lassen? Existiert aber auf dem Schild - zumindest beim FIRST. So was wie Name:Slogan=* oder Name:tagline=* gibt es ja nicht. 

Ich ändere das mal eben und schiebe es in description.

Danke für den Hinweis.
Norbert Dichter (2025-05-29 20:44:44+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166941390
evgenykatyshev (2025-05-30 05:39:14+00:00): Привет! Не могли бы вы уточнить какого рода достопримечательность с названием «Дворец Романовых» вы добавили на карту? Это исторический дворец или что-то другое?
Aleksandr1964 (2025-05-30 06:03:58+00:00): Добрый день.
Заброшенная усадьба графини Марии Фесенко (также известная как дворец Романовых). Это архитектурное чудо, возведенное в конце XIX века, представляет собой трехэтажное здание, выполненное в экзотическом мавританском стиле, что является редкостью для этого региона.
Загородный дом графини Марии Фесенко, также известный как Махинджаурский детский дом, является недвижимым памятником культуры категории государственного значения в Батуми, в Аджарской Автономной Республике.

Строительство загородного дома началось в первой половине XX века и принадлежало няне последнего российского императора Николая II графине Марии Фесенко. По словам местных жителей, дача была построена в 1900—1907 годах. По имеющимся данным, здание было спроектировано грузинским архитектором, но достроили его архитекторы, приглашенные из Санкт-Петербурга. Его аналог был также в Италии.
Aleksandr1964 (2025-05-30 06:08:25+00:00): Возможно я перепутал место на карте
evgenykatyshev (2025-05-30 07:03:58+00:00): Да, упомянутый дворец вот здесь находится https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465414207
NeisBot (2025-05-29 20:37:35+00:00): Hi _enestepe, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added farmland area with name 'ss' and supporting nodes"

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #AIgenerated #Gibberish
JeroenHoek (2025-05-29 20:54:28+00:00): Hoe kom je bij asfalt? Die weg is niet geasfalteerd.
Information01 (2025-05-30 07:15:32+00:00): Wanneer ben jij er voor het laatst geweest? Sinds ongeveer 2 maanden (exacte datum weet ik zo niet) is deze hoek geasfalteerd. Ik vind het jammer, maar het is helaaas wel zo.
JeroenHoek (2025-05-30 07:55:20+00:00): Dat is prima, maar geef dat dan duidelijk aan in de source van je changeset met 'survey' als je er geweest bent. Of iets als 'weg is recent geasfalteerd' in de comment.

Deze comment is erg vreemd geformuleerd:

"Dankzij het feit dat de weg geasfalteerd is komt highway=track niet meer overeen met de werkelijkheid."

Dat roept vragen op.
Information01 (2025-05-30 11:16:17+00:00): Ik zal er bij en volgende keer rekening mee houden dat mijn commentaar duidelijker moet zijn.
JeroenHoek (2025-05-30 11:21:12+00:00): Top!

Je kan bij zo'n situatie trouwens ook gelijk de maxspeed erbij zetten. Dit valt allemaal in het 60km/h-gebied daar. Ik heb dat gedaan, en ook de oude source-tags verwijderd. Source-tags zijn bij wegen niet meer nodig als ze al jaren ingetekend zijn en zichtbaar zijn op de luchtbeelden en BGT. (Voor changesets zijn ze juist wel handig.)
Leo1590 (2025-05-29 20:48:46+00:00): Hola, estos cambios son visibles para todos los usuarios
dadavid (2025-05-29 21:12:41+00:00): Hi, ist das hier [1] ein Gebäudename oder fehlt da der amenity Tag? 

Viele Grüße 

David

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31464581
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-05-31 20:40:58+00:00): Hello. Why did you remove the letters and numbers from the alleyways? A parcel map of the area shows them as having names (like Alley A or Alley 1). These aren't highway numbers, they're just the names of the alleyways. I hope you understand, and thank you.
Joseph R P (2025-06-01 21:16:39+00:00): On roadways, the ref key should be used for official signed highway number designations, like CC 215 or NV 613. If these are signposted on the ground as names such as 'Alley A', they could be to the name key. If not, since these would be officially unnamed roads, it may be best to leave them unnamed, which would be fine since all the buildings in this complex are addressed to Carriage Hill Drive.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-06-02 02:15:22+00:00): Alright, thank you for answering my question. I have no idea if these roads are signed, but a parcel map from Clark County's OpenWeb shows them as having names. Should I put name:signed=no for the named alleyways?
Joseph R P (2025-06-03 16:40:26+00:00): Which map or map layer in particular did you find these names on? Personally I would say yes to keeping the names alongside adding the tag if they appear on a map like the OpenWeb map because this would indicate that they are official road names.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-06-03 16:49:10+00:00): I got the alleys' names from OpenWeb and the Private Drives' names from an accessor's parcel map, also provided by OpenWeb. Just zoom in to the appropriate areas, and they should be there.
Joseph R P (2025-06-04 23:12:24+00:00): I would say that, in this case, the names could stay with name:signed=no added as a tag.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-06-25 06:44:37+00:00): (Late response, but...)
Alrighty then. I don't know if these are signed since street-level imagery is limited here, so I might have to wait a while. From the pictures I was able to obtain from the street leading into the area, the private drives don't appear to be signed, so I could at least change those. This area in particular is a gated community, which could explain the lack of street-level imagery inside the area.
redd (2025-05-29 20:51:03+00:00): Hinweis: Feiertags (Heute) auch geöffnet, PH ergänzt
Emilius123 (2025-07-07 02:35:26+00:00): Löst Hinweis #4777245.