piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hugoren Martinako (2024-12-24 18:46:30+00:00): Además que el dato de población lo has ido añadiendo y modificando tú... ¿en base a qué fuente?

Según el geoportal de Mutxamel (http://www.geoportal.mutxamel.org/), capa de "Planeamiento y Gestión" y "Zonificación", se pueden observar las divisiones que realiza el ayuntamiento dentro de su PGOU. Dichos sectores son los que facilitan al INE para establecer el dato de población.

Tossal Redó no está en ninguno incluido, por lo que debe estar considerado como parte del diseminado.
Jordi MF (2024-12-24 23:01:35+00:00): Es curioso que, observando el historial del nodo, el dato de población ha ido cambiando de 650 habitantes a 350 y, ahora, a 230 sin saber la fuente de la que se ha extraído el dato.
Jordi MF_import (2024-12-30 18:03:48+00:00): A falta de respuesta y de que la única referencia que he encontrado es que "el Tossal Redó" es una partida según la AVL, pero no un nucleo poblacional, cambio la etiqueta a place=locality.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160573801
Jordi MF_import (2024-12-30 18:07:49+00:00): Pedón, quería decir place=neighbourhood. Y elimino, mientrastanto, el dato poblacional ya que el usuario no indica la fuente de datos.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 00:58:28+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164876477
NeisBot (2024-12-24 12:38:38+00:00): Hi Elie Cib, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 108 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=160574068
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-24 12:54:08+00:00): Looks like some contributors added buildings, while others decided to play 'build and remove' later ...
eggie (2024-12-24 13:01:05+00:00): ..en oneway=no is ook zo'n default tag.
Dat zetten we alleen als je 'bang' bent dat een medemapper oneway=yes gaat taggen. Bv op een tweerichting fietsrotonde.. of een twee richting fietsoversteek of parallelfietspad.
Het zijn dan aanwijzingen voor medemappers.
Hiet zou oneway=no net zo goed weg kunnen.
Gr eggie
NeisBot (2024-12-24 12:42:38+00:00): Hi Estherluanda, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 89% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 328 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=160574195
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-24 12:54:16+00:00): Looks like some contributors added buildings, while others decided to play 'build and remove' later ...
NeisBot (2024-12-24 13:00:38+00:00): Hi Estherluanda, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 85% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 315 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=160574778
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-24 13:08:11+00:00): Looks like some contributors added buildings, while others decided to play 'build and remove' later ...
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:35:29+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801866
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-24 23:42:45+00:00): Why?
Loren Maxwell (2024-12-24 23:49:18+00:00): One of the threads of this broad discussion here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposed-double-entry-of-consolidated-city-counties/122459/

Basically, `place` tags can be removed on a relation with `boundary=administrative` if the label node has a `place` tag
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-25 08:36:56+00:00): Thanks for your reply.
Jordi MF (2024-12-24 16:43:10+00:00): En valencià, encara que l'article del topònim estiga a l'inici, s'ha d'escriure en minúscula, com en el cas de "el Cocó". És el que diu la normativa ortogràfica de l'AVL (per exemple, https://visor.gva.es/visor/?extension=715106,4259763,716525,4260420&nivelZoom=17&capasids=Topografico;,0103_NTV;&tcapas=1.0,1.0)
Salutacions,
Jordi
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160575291
Jordi MF (2024-12-24 17:12:50+00:00): Por otra parte, a fecha de 2024, no existe ninguna entidad oficial en el Nomenclátor Geográfico de Municipios y Entidades de Población que se llame "El Cocó" ni en los mapas del Institut Cartogràfic Valencià ni del IGN. ¿Cómo podríamos corroborar que "El Cocó" es una aldea (place=hamlet)?

Saludos
NeisBot (2024-12-24 13:16:38+00:00): Hi Estherluanda, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 95% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 711 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=160575399
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-24 23:38:16+00:00): Looks like some contributors added buildings, while others decided to play 'build and remove' later ...
NeisBot (2024-12-24 13:24:37+00:00): Hi Estherluanda, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 308 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=160575693
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-24 23:38:29+00:00): Looks like some contributors added buildings, while others decided to play 'build and remove' later ...
eggie (2024-12-24 13:46:08+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,
Kleine aanpassing gedaan.... Gebouw uitgelijnd mbv de BAG.. Duplikaat adresnode verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
Tjuro (2024-12-27 10:16:35+00:00): Hello vjethro,

I see that you are making a lot of edits with the comment "Continuing my edits". Would it be possible for you to comment on what you actually changed, for example: aligned road, added grass. etc.

Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Greetings,

Tjuro
moonraver (2025-01-16 11:41:55+00:00): zdravim, len sa chcem opytat, ci tam pribudla nova tabula na vyhliadke,alebo prerobili staru, lebo trochu ma prekvapil ten nazov.Na tej starej to nebolo pisane. Bolo by vhodne tam aj pridat tag na nu source:name=survey
pán Petrík (2025-01-16 12:58:38+00:00): cau, moonraver,
neviem porovnat s minulostou. Viem len o stave z leta 2024. Na zabradli je prichytena tabula s kopcami, ktore z vyhliadky vidno a na nej je aj nazov vyhliadky. Co sa tyka zdroja, mam tam uz source survey, ale mozem pridat aj source name survey. Do spravy ti posielam link na fotku, platny 7 dni.
moonraver (2025-01-17 11:08:33+00:00): parada,dik za info aj fotku. Konecne to oficialne nazvali,tak ako sa to volalo ale iba medzi ludmi. Ak sa nenahevate: 
1. dal som tu fotku na freemap,aby to bolo vidiet
2.to slovo panorama len pomenovava rozsah pohladu (nedaval by som ju tam),pouzival sa vzdy nazov Štefánikova vyhliadka v clankoch mestskeho uradu v TN,len to nebolo nejako oficialne
3. doplnim tu tabulu do mapy
pán Petrík (2025-01-17 11:36:25+00:00): Čau,
ja som pôvodne chcel dať odkaz na tú fotku priamo do osm, aby ju bolo vidno ako zdroj názvu, ale nenašiel som server, kde by tá fotka zostala bez časového obmedzenia. Ak vieš o takej možnosti, kľudne to tak urob. Fotku použi, ako potrebuješ. Názov idem opraviť.
moonraver (2025-01-17 11:39:11+00:00): uz som opravil, kukni ci sa ti to pozdava
moonraver (2025-01-17 11:39:42+00:00): doplnil som tam aj zabradlie
pán Petrík (2025-01-17 11:50:40+00:00): som spokojny, dik.
moonraver (2025-01-17 11:53:30+00:00): aj ja dik za spolupracu
Luzandro (2025-04-09 18:49:29+00:00): Hallo,

hier wäre ein OSM Hinweis angebracht gewesen, dass hier noch mehr zu aktualisieren ist, nachdem hier u.a. eine highway=secondary Einbahn in einen Radweg gemündet ist

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4701360
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160576454
totera (2024-12-25 22:22:07+00:00): Ciao Marcello, sei sicuro che sia una buona idea cancellare il tag name? È vero che non abbiamo uno standard (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/poste-italiane-che-name/8781) ma "Poste Italiane" mi sembra meglio di nulla.
arcanma (2024-12-27 10:15:25+00:00): Ciao Totera, ho rimosso il name dove è "Ufficio postale" oppure "Poste Italiane" dove c'è già operator="Poste Italiane" e che sia un ufficio postale è implicito nel tipo di amenity, quindi è una ripetizione inutile che non da nessuna informazione aggiuntiva. La mia intenzione è pian piano per tutti gli uffici dell'Umbria aggiungere il ref (= codice frazionario delle poste) e il nome adeguato, ad esempio Perugia 7.
Dove le poste in una località hanno un solo ufficio generalmente lo chiamano con il nome della località, in questi casi non ho ancora deciso se metterlo o meno, per il momento tenderei a lasciarlo se c'è ma a non aggiungerlo
eggie (2024-12-24 14:13:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Het zou gewoon moeten routeren.  Wellicht dat LiveNav 
problemen heeft met maxweight	8
en de maxspeed 30.


https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160576720
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
JippeVRHM (2024-12-24 14:49:23+00:00): Hoi Eggie, 

Dankjewel, ik denk dat de max weight inderdaad het probleem geeft. Maar ik hoop dat de tag emergency ervoor zorgt dat dit genegeerd wordt.
marczoutendijk (2026-05-06 17:20:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1345993373#map=19/33.632726/-95.555275

Building=D??

What do you mean?

Best regards  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
bxl-forever (2024-12-24 21:42:53+00:00): Bonjour,

Un petit conseil pour vos contributions sur OSM : mettre un titre qui corresponde fidèlement au contenu.

« Ajout de lampadaires » signifie que vous ajoutez des lampadaires.

Je vois que le changement ici contient aussi un changement de forme d'un trottoir (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535186770) + la création d'un stationnement (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1345993450).

+ Essayer de faire des changements sur des zones plus petites car le stationnement est à 1,6 km du lampadaire. Bonne pratique = changements pour un thème et un endroit précis. C'est plus facile quand nous examinons. Merci.
bwbuz (2025-11-21 01:55:09+00:00): Ich bitte dringend um saubere Arbeit an den destination-tags und als Vandalismus anzusehende Löschungen der von mir zuvor gesetzten destination:backward-tags zu unterlassen.
map per (2024-12-25 17:44:02+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
JJIglesias (2024-12-24 15:39:06+00:00): Saludos, la F16 como cualquiera de las vias de la Red Vial Fundamental (RVF), tiene un trazo marcado por Leyes Nacionales. Esa variante entre Tumupasa y San Jose de Uchupiamonas, NO existe en la Ley y por lo tanto No puede ponerse en Ref ese. Numero.
Tienes alguna fuente legal que justifique ese dato que pusiste?
Gracias
5m4u9 (2024-12-25 05:11:57+00:00): En el decreto de creación de la RVF menciona que la F16 continua de apolo a ixiamas y dice que hay ramal san buenaventura-tumapasa-ixiamas para unir a la otra carretera. 

La ABC Regional La Paz resalta la carretera tumapasa-san josé de uchupianomas en su mapa, aunque por el mal diseño y deficiencia del mapa no se ve su código de carretera, yo pienso que podemos asumir que es la F16.

mapa RVF La Paz → https://www.abc.gob.bo/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/La-Paz.jpg

DS RVF → https://www.lexivox.org/norms/BO-DS-25134.xhtml
A-Rth-Urp-Hil-Ipdenu (2025-06-03 13:30:10+00:00): Hi,

As Donkey Lane has full public access, could I remove the designation=permissive_footpath tag?
Matt Aardvar (2025-06-03 14:43:06+00:00): My error - you are correct.

I have updated 

Thanks
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:35:27+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801864
Supaplex (2024-12-25 06:30:49+00:00): Hi

Thanks for the mapping. You can use q shortcut to square the building to make it more correct.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160579120
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-29 09:48:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160742400 where the changeset comment is: revert unexplained building deletion/adding of zoning data in Colombia, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17016
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-29 09:48:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160742400 where the changeset comment is: revert unexplained building deletion/adding of zoning data in Colombia, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17016
eggie (2024-12-24 15:48:09+00:00): Dag Generic,

De winkel heb ik verplaatst naar het juiste pand.
Hoe zit het met printshop copyshop die op hetzelfde adres nering heeft? 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-12-24 16:14:16+00:00): Pronto print verwijderd
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:33:33+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801841
Karel973 (2026-02-03 20:44:22+00:00): Dit is volgens de BAG-kaart een openbaren weg. waarom is dit aangepast naar oprit?
eggie (2024-12-24 16:10:12+00:00): Tip  Goed bezig!

 Ik denk dat je die node van het zwembad kunt combineren met de BAG adresnode 203. 
Tenminste als dat het juiste adres is. 
Daar heb je overigens een website adres op gezet. 
Gr eggie
zhiar590 (2024-12-24 16:07:17+00:00): https://ibb.co/W02wbd1
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-10 18:45:57+00:00): Hello!

You used
access=permissivef
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12449729519/history

Have you maybe meant
access=permissive
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
lukeender (2025-04-10 18:50:40+00:00): Hi! This was deliberate -- there is a gate which is locked with a chain, but the chain is long enough that you can open it enough to pass through, and it seems to be a very commonly used path. I witnessed many people using it, including large groups. Therefore I used the permissive tag. I'm happy to have it changed to something which is more fitting.
lukeender (2025-04-10 18:51:47+00:00): Ah yes that must be a typo? I can't understand how that happened, though. Oops.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-11 07:52:55+00:00): edited!
DaveF (2024-12-24 18:03:23+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1346017210

As the cycle lane is unprotected it is already tagged on the roadway as 'cycleway=opposite_lane'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167283
bc1829 (2024-12-26 16:37:17+00:00): Hi -

That's a good point; I hadn't noticed that tag on the road. Happy for that part of the edit to be reverted, though I believe there is an argument for removing the cycleway tag from the road and leaving the geometry this way as it's easier to read as a human looking at the map.
literan (2024-12-25 17:13:57+00:00): два фитнес-центра в одном здании?
Virgile1994 (2024-12-24 16:08:40+00:00): Arrêts T62 Grenoble à Chantesse
NieWnen (2024-12-24 18:29:15+00:00): Nie mamy jeszcze 2025 :) Nie ma co zmieniać tak wcześnie, co najwyżej jakieś proposed.
Późny wieczór 31 lub 1 stycznia byłoby OK + wraz z takimi zmianami teryt też raczej powinien zostać zaktualizowany.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-25 19:59:54+00:00): wycofane jakoż iż jeszcze 2025 nie ma

(choć inna sprawa że klasyfikacja urzędowa nie powinna być wprost przekładana na place=)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-22 13:56:09+00:00): can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4869847 

looks like a Rostic/KFC confusion
Anton Khorev (2025-07-23 17:45:00+00:00): It's not "confusion". It's nobody bothered to update the node after rebranding.
mcliquid (2024-12-24 17:20:02+00:00): Dieses Changeset wurde vollständig zurückgesetzt, da hierin das Gebäude-Tag entfernt wurde, die gesamte Fläche als Kunstwerk (Gemälde) abgeändert wurde und unnötigerweise Ecken des Gebäudes gelöscht worden sind.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160583297
mcliquid (2024-12-24 17:23:58+00:00): Behoben in  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160583408
Jorrdi MF (2024-12-28 08:07:57+00:00): Revertido changeset de usuario pancatalanistaa que usa mapa de OSM para fines políticos (Jordi MF). Reverted changeset from pan-Catalan user who uses OSM map for political purposes (Jordi MF). One name official.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160703052
rle32795 (2024-12-30 07:47:57+00:00): Hi 目立たない.

You've requested a review of your changes.

The deprecated tag (underground=yes) could've been removed.

But I can remove it now though.

Regards
rle
Senihtu (2025-05-27 17:15:16+00:00): Hallo!
In diesem Changeset hast Du zu Relation 10677078 (Bus MKK-98: Hintersteinau => Schlüchtern)
not:network:wikidata=Q314042 eingetragen.
Warum? 
Die Buslinie gehört doch zum RMV-Network und dann wären folgende Einträge richtig:
'network' = 'Rhein-Main-Verkehrsverbund'
'network:short' = 'RMV'
'network:wikidata' = 'Q314042'
Einen schönen Abend noch!
stasiu512 (2024-12-24 16:46:13+00:00): Cześć, myśle że dalsza cześć drogi, czyli Nowa Gdańska również nie ma planu budowy. Jesteś w stanie zweryfikować?
theDM (2024-12-24 17:07:41+00:00): Cześć, uważam tak samo. Nie ma żadnych działań w temacie Nowej Gdańskiej i szanse na to są w zasadzie żadne, ale nie mam źródeł na to. Dla mnie też Nową Gdańską można usunąć.
czebureks (2024-12-24 23:29:36+00:00): Uważam, że dopóki nie ma tak jednoznacznej deklaracji ze strony władz miasta jak w przypadku zaniechania budowy odcinka Legionów-Chrobrego, to cezurą w takich sytuacjach powinny być ustalenia MPZP. Trudno będzie ustalić inne obiektywne i weryfikowalne kryterium, by stwierdzić, która droga ma szansę, a która nie ma szansy powstać.
theDM (2024-12-25 13:37:17+00:00): Przeczytałem definicję tagu proposed (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dproposed) i dalszy ciąg jest do usunięcia.
Nie ma info, czy rzeczywiście powstanie ani jaki będzie miała przebieg, tak samo było m. in. z Nową Politechniczną czy drugą jezdnią S22, gdzie jedynie istnieje rezerwa terenowa.
Uważam, że też do usunięcia powinna być OPAT / Via Maris, bo też budowa stoi pod potężnym znakiem zapytania, a i nie wiadomo, czy w ogołe powstanie.
stasiu512 (2024-12-25 13:44:07+00:00): Analogiczna sytuacja jest z Nową Muzyczną, Nową Wyzwolenia, Nową Spacerową wraz z tunelem pod pachołkiem i kolejnym etapem Nowej Wałowej. Wszystkie z nich są dodane w OSM
theDM (2024-12-25 14:06:59+00:00): nad Nową Wyzwolenia siedzą od min. 5 lat i nic nie wiadomo :)
Nowa Spacerowa jest w planach, ale nie ma kasy :D.
Zostaje kwestia Via Maris oraz 2. wariantu Drogi Czerwonej w Gdyni. Bym je usunął, ale nwm czy na wątku o kategoriach dróg na forum nie lepiej za wczasu to omówić.
stasiu512 (2024-12-25 14:23:39+00:00): Przedyskutować nigdy nie zaszkodzi :)
theDM (2024-12-25 16:26:43+00:00): Dla mnie sprawa jest raczej oczywista.
theDM (2024-12-25 17:14:30+00:00): Poszło na forum.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-24 17:11:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323004545

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 20:49:03+00:00): Hello!

You used
water=pond;
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6680803/history

Have you maybe meant
water=pond
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Necessarycoot72 (2025-04-29 21:41:34+00:00): Yeah, that was a typo. Fixed in changeset 165610084
trial (2024-12-28 22:28:50+00:00): Bonjour, attention le sens de l'coulement a de l'importance, vous avez créé des boucles (j'ai corrigé), trouv grace à https://waterwaymap.org/loops/#map=18.06/48.071474/-3.244588
Florent5635 (2025-01-09 19:34:13+00:00): Bonjour, 
Oui en effet, merci d'avoir corrigé, je m'en suis rendu compte tardivement et j'y fais attention désormais
Bonne journée
trial (2025-01-10 08:46:49+00:00): Parfait, "ça coule de source" ;-)
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-29 09:48:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160742400 where the changeset comment is: revert unexplained building deletion/adding of zoning data in Colombia, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17016
schobbish (2025-02-24 03:34:01+00:00): Hello due to recent construction Bing aerial is out of date. I had it correct before based on GPS traces.
schobbish (2025-02-24 04:24:24+00:00): Bing aerial imagery is currently out of date and does not reflect recent construction. I previously mapped this area using my own GPS traces. Some images: https://imgur.com/a/qOysHnz

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162875557
nevw (2024-12-26 01:13:12+00:00): Hi, when adding streams always draw the line pointing downstream in the direction the water flows, which is normally into a bigger stream or river and onto the sea or an inland salt pan in dry country.
nevw (2024-12-26 01:14:01+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:waterway
johnpeterdavies (2024-12-26 12:16:57+00:00): Thanks for the input, I will do so for future edits. I'm just starting to contribute to OSM, but will aim to get very accurate maps for the areas like this in which I work regularly.
Markus366 (2024-12-28 20:19:37+00:00): Hallo,

bist du sicher, dass dieser Standort korrekt ist? Ein gleicher Eintrag wurde an anderer Stelle angelegt: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160584144
Markus366 (2025-12-01 10:30:35+00:00): Beschreibung und Lage des AED passen nicht zusammen. Bitte überprüfen
jakaxyz (2025-01-02 10:54:05+00:00): Servus,
wie kommt's das du hier alle Nodes und Ways gelöscht hast?
Dein Commit-Titel hast du leider sehr unklar gewählt.
Sebastian_87 (2025-01-02 11:07:15+00:00): Gebäude falsch eingezeichnet.

Gruss
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 02:12:33+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165051294
JohnHk (2024-12-24 18:35:04+00:00): I've reverted your changeset because removing landuse is never the answer. I've changed the tags to landuse=brownfield
was:landuse=vineyard
you can read about these tags here (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=brownfield)
You can also review my change here if you'd like. (https://osmcha.org/changesets/160584796)
mavl (2025-02-05 14:03:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162167075 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: wrong values for name:en - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161608012].