piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-05-25 11:22:19+00:00): Hi Onni Hakala, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Updated max height restriction for a minor road"

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #AIgenerated #NoComment
NeisReview (2025-05-25 11:42:28+00:00): #vandalism
DD1GJ (2025-05-25 13:06:23+00:00): revert vandalism
NeisBot (2025-05-25 11:22:23+00:00): Hi moin-meister, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Converted hospital to garage building, removing healthcare tags"

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #AIgenerated #Gibberish
DD1GJ (2025-05-25 13:03:05+00:00): revert nonsense
eggie (2025-05-25 12:30:49+00:00): Dag Bendinko... Je vraagt feedback.. Ik heb er even een toegangsweg van gemaakt en het hek toegevoegd met access=no
Ook het bos van het vlak gehaald.

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2025-05-25 11:36:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-05-26 06:32:07+00:00): Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166731037
matteo564 (2025-08-12 19:20:57+00:00): Ciao, da che fonte hai avuto la notizia che i bivacchi non esistono e il sentiero è chiuso? In che periodo è avvenuto il fenomeno? Non ho trovato in giro notizie, neanche sul sito del comune; hai una foto dell'ordinanza? Ieri i miei sono saliti ai bivacchi (che esistono ancora) senza problemi, segnalazioni o comunicati di chiusure. Magari ti sei confuso con qualche altro luogo? Sarebbe opportuno prima verificare con sopralluogo in loco e cmq se le way sono state create o modificate da altri utenti se non avvertirli almeno prima di eliminarle definitivamente meglio usare tag di restrizione dell'accesso o rimuovere i tag fisici (highway in questo caso) ma lasciare la way per motivi storici e di eventuale ripristino: potrebbe essere un fenomeno temporaneo.
Tutte le modifiche dovrebbero essere fatte dopo un'attenta valutazione, soprattutto le eliminazioni. 
Certo di aver solo dato dei buoni consigli tra mappatori e senza voler essere risultato di tono aggressivo o polemico attendo tuoi aggiornamenti :-) 
Matteo
Davide Cozzi (2025-08-20 11:28:41+00:00): Mi aggiungo alla discussione, anch'io ho provato a contattare Mountainscaper tramite messaggio privato quando ho visto questa modifica, in quanto non trovavo nessuna notizia o ordinanza che dicesse che i bivacchi sono inagibili e il sentiero chiuso. Data questa tua testimonianza diretta direi che possiamo tranquillamente ripristinare le modifiche fatte
matteo564 (2025-08-20 11:43:21+00:00): Ciao, grazie dell'intervento; attenderei ancora oggi o domani che gli mando un messaggio diretto anche io in privato, poi se non abbiamo riscontri direi di procedere. È il caso di un revert (visto che mi sembra che le modifiche di questo changeset si riferiscano solo alla way del sentiero e alle aree dei biavchi)? Tu per caso sei pratico? O ci sono altre soluzioni? Se invece fosse necessario fare un revert parziale sai come si può fare?
Davide Cozzi (2025-08-20 11:46:59+00:00): In privato gli ho scritto 1 mese fa e ha totalmente ignorato, anche se ha continuato a pubblicare modifiche in altri sentieri. Per il revert mi stavo informando, sarebbe da fare con JOSM da quello che ho capito
silversurfer83 (2025-05-25 20:58:05+00:00): Hi :)

please don't make "points" into buildings. A building is "just" a building. It houses a "Point Of Interest" (POI) or even several of them. It is best, to keep the POI and the building separate. So please keep a point for each restaurant, shop,... inside the building it resides in. Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166730928
Donut Master 🍩 (2025-05-26 15:26:21+00:00): Thanks for telling me, silversurfer83!
NeisBot (2025-05-25 11:48:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-05-26 06:32:16+00:00): 👍 Thank you for your map updates.
bxl-forever (2025-05-25 12:18:53+00:00): Hello,

You added this place next to an existing restaurant in the same building.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10792703407

Do I understand that *both* places are still operating in the same building.  I would suspect that Olive replaced the existing one, not go along with it.

What did you see here?
humiki (2025-05-25 13:29:43+00:00): Ah, yes, it did replace the other one. Sorry about that
bxl-forever (2025-05-25 13:58:33+00:00): Fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10792703407
Endres Pelka (2025-12-30 15:50:14+00:00): Zauważyłem Twój komentarz na temat Zespołu Szkolno-Przedszkolnego:
„Tu jest babol. Budynek ma 127 a jest też nr 129”
Sam się nad tym głowiłem. Według Geoportalu budynek ma numer 129. Ale sama szkoła używa 127, tak jest na ich stronie internetowej (w nagłówku!) jak i w RSPO.
Postanowiłem zostawić obydwa adresy.
Tomkow1933 (2025-12-30 15:57:46+00:00): Czyli jaki to ma właściwie nr?
Teraz to nie pamiętam o co chodziło. Prawdopodobnie łączyłem nr z budynkami i była rozbierzność
Dawid2849 (2025-05-27 09:35:17+00:00): Cześć. Ta nazwa to dodana przez przypadek, prawda? wydaje mi się, że siedziałem na niej kiedyś i nazwy nie widziałem :D
NeisRevert (2025-05-27 05:47:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/166806960 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove testdata
NieWnen (2025-05-26 18:17:49+00:00): Kostka na jezdni?
Na przejściach/przejazdach pieszo-rowerowych?
Zyklon (2025-05-26 18:49:34+00:00): Which object does your question refer to?
NieWnen (2025-05-26 19:32:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1366694204
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1366694205
Zyklon (2025-05-26 20:12:11+00:00): Yes, there really can't be sidewalk tile in the driveway. That's my mistake. Thank you for your attention.
rempshaener (2025-05-25 20:28:55+00:00): Hallo,
bitte keine Platzhalter ("?") eintragen, sondern einfach leer lassen.
Viele Grüße
dónal (2025-05-28 22:07:50+00:00): Made some very minor changes (to make use of specific tags that are more appropriate).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166733216
mueschel (2025-05-26 16:52:39+00:00): Hi,
die Mühe, alle Tags mit einem "abandoned:" zu versehen brauchst du dir nicht machen. 

abandoned:amenity=telephone	
und vielleicht noch ein paar Tags welche das Aussehen beschreiben sind völlig ausreichend - alles andere kann weg, da es ja eindeutig keine Chance mehr gibt, dass das jemals noch eine Rolle spielen wird.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-25 13:12:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Witolda Lipińskiego Szczedronia":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862571433
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862571455
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862571456

"Aleja Architektów":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862571449
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862571450
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862571451
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862571452
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862571453
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862571472
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862571473
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862571474
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862571475
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862571476
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862571477

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
DD1GJ (2025-05-25 13:05:43+00:00): revert vandalism
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-25 13:12:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Aleja Generała Józefa Hallera":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862560626
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862560627
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862560628
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862560629
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862560630
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862560631
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862560632
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862560633
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862560634
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862560635
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862560636
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862560637

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
chris66 (2025-07-03 18:07:17+00:00): Nein, das ist kein Rad/Fußweg. Es ist ein Wirtschaftweg der WSA, Radfahrer und Fußgänger sind auf eigene Gefahr geduldet.
eggie (2025-05-25 13:56:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Tip wees voorzichtig met wat je aanpast op de kaart. Dit is wat je hebt gedaan.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166735168

Paden van de begraafplaats liggen over de wijk nu.
Verder ben ik benieuwd waarom je de fietspaden op slot zet met access=no  Dat betekent Verboden Toegang.
Al die accesstag bicycle en foot=yes en notor_vehicle=no horen niet op fietspaden.
Waarom access=no? 
War wel goed is de tag surface=asphalt.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-05-25 13:58:52+00:00): reverted by changeset #166735828
eggie (2025-05-25 14:07:00+00:00): Je edits heb ik teruggedraaid. surface=asphalt staat nog wel op het fietspad.
Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust.

MVG
eggie
aceman444 (2025-11-23 14:21:55+00:00): Zdravim, naozaj su https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1389558956 schody?
Tomas_J (2025-11-23 14:29:23+00:00): Cus,  to neviem (source	aerial imagery; Ortofotomozaika SR).
Tomas_J (2025-11-23 14:32:20+00:00): ...ak nie su zreteľné z ortofoto, tak je možné , že som to pozeral cez streetview alebo mapillary, ak som ich tam dal. Ale nepamätám si už...
aceman444 (2025-11-23 15:09:44+00:00): Dobry napad. Na Mapillary to v roku 2021 ako schody vyzeralo. Ale uz su tam aj fotky z 1.10.2025 (po Vasej zmene) a tam to vyzera ako sikmy chodnik. Mozno to prestavali.
Dakujem, opravim.
BCNorwich (2025-05-26 05:49:22+00:00): Path removed because that's a bus-only highway.
rempshaener (2025-05-25 20:31:12+00:00): Hallo,
bitte keine Platzhalter eintragen. Zudem passt das water_tank:volume nicht zu water_source=main.
Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-13 12:59:46+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862615733/history has fixme:type = fix that was added in this edit
what should be fixed here? do you need help with selecting better tags?
DD1GJ (2025-05-25 14:21:51+00:00): Moin,

wilkommen bei OSM und danke für die Korrektur der 21. Aber müsste die jetzige 21 b nicht die 20 sein?

Lies Dir bitte das Tutorial durch und unterlasse Jux-Einträge und Phantasienamen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim
osmviborg (2025-05-25 14:42:58+00:00): Man bruger ikke 'cycleway=lane' på en 'cycleway'. Se mere her: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway=lane (er rettet).
rempshaener (2025-05-25 20:28:05+00:00): Hallo,
zu dieser Wasserentnahmestelle habe ich eine Anmerkung.

emergency=water_tank ist in der Regel eine offene Wasserentnahmestelle. Das sieht hier https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=594749320265598&focus=photo&lat=50.92294519&lng=9.219613055&z=17&x=0.6395501067373216&y=0.4549054507950012&zoom=0.47212475877516713 nicht so aus.


Gebräuchlicher wäre, von der Art der Wasserentnahme auszugehen, dann ergibt sich:

emergency=fire_hydrant
fire_hydrant:type=pipe
fire_hydrant:pressure=suction
couplings=2
couplings:diameters=A;A
water_source=water_tank
water_tank:volume=295 m³

Viele Grüße
NeisBot (2025-05-25 14:13:35+00:00): Hi Robbie2012, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 80% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 highway(s)
- 3 building(s)
- 1 natural(s)
- 3 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=166736403
kmpoppe_repair (2025-05-25 18:08:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166746016 where the changeset comment is: Removed fantasy edit
DD1GJ (2025-05-25 14:25:04+00:00): Phantasienamen gelöscht
GerdP (2025-05-27 08:28:20+00:00): Hi! 
Diese Änderung führte zu "kaputten" Knotenpunkt-Routen an der Kreuzung in Rehden.
https://www.osm.org/relation/18055810
https://www.osm.org/relation/18055808
Das Problem ist, dass die Routen tatsächlich nicht korrekt fahrbar sind. Man muss da absteigen und schieben oder irgendwelche absurden Umwege fahren. Der Planer und die Gemeinde wissen das auch, aber letztere stört sich anscheinend nicht dran :(
Hast Du eine Idee, wie man die Lücken schliessen kann, so das knooppuntnet nicht meckert?
GerdP (2025-05-27 08:33:22+00:00): Ich sehe gerade den Weg https://www.osm.org/way/1389563617. Ist da jetzt wirklich ein Radweg? Dann hat sich was geändert seit meiner letzten Befahrung. Auf meinem Foto sehe ich da nur eine recht große Verkehrsinsel, aber keinen Weg drüber.
GerdP (2025-05-27 08:36:58+00:00): Neh, war vorher schon so gemappt und ich habe es nicht korrigiert, als ich die Routen-Relation https://www.osm.org/relation/18054312 angelegt habe :(
Langlaeufer (2025-05-27 09:23:31+00:00): Ich hab an der Kreuzung nochmal rumgefriemelt. Schau mal nochmal drüber.
Die Gehwege entlang der B214 sind mit Radwegfreigabe. Auf der Südseite soll es wohl nur Für Fahrräder kurz auf die Fahrbahn gehen. Die Fußgänger dürfen sich ihren Weg wohl selber suchen.
GerdP (2025-05-27 09:37:54+00:00): Ja, so ähnlich hätte ich es auch gemacht. Löst allerdings nicht die Probleme mit den kaputten Routen:
https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/network/17840228/facts#RouteNotContinious
Tomas Straupis (2025-05-25 15:14:08+00:00): Laba diena. Pažiūrėjau. Čia rimtai keliuką per pievą kapitaliai remontavo iki gyvenamojo kelio? Nei vienoje ortonuotraukoje to nesimato ir nelabai aišku, kam to reikėtų.
Tomas Straupis (2025-05-25 15:15:57+00:00): Ir pėsčiųjų perėjų jame pribraižė? Tai net ir išasfaltavo?
redd (2025-05-25 14:30:15+00:00): Danke!
tomamic (2025-05-25 14:32:32+00:00): https://www.parmatoday.it/attualita/nuova-passerella-ciclo-pedonale-canale-maggiore.html
Jrachi (2025-05-27 06:57:51+00:00): Ciao.
Vedo che hai fatto delle modifiche importanti sulla Via Francigena.
Il tratto tra Novalesa e Venaus andrebbe mappato come alternativa e non nel tracciato ufficiale.
Tra l'altro, essendo un percorso riconosciuto dalla regione Piemonte, queste varianti non dovrebbero essere parte della Via Francigena. Ma capisco benissimo il problema per un osmwer che vede un cartello e non gli può certo venire il dubbio che si tratti  di varianti autorizzate o meno...
Quello che invece non capisco è perché hai inserito delle way sul territorio francese.
Quella che hai modificato è la relazione del tratto Piemonte, variante Moncenisio, che è parte del tratto Via Francigena Italia.
La parte francese non può essere parte dell'Italia!
Ivo
Lezurex (2025-05-25 19:30:49+00:00): Am besten auch gleich noch highway=residential=>living_street.
Interactiondesigner (2025-05-26 20:10:49+00:00): Ja, in der Tat. Den Hinweis nehme ich gerne auf und aktualisiere das noch.
user_5359 (2025-05-26 09:21:46+00:00): Hello! What is the mean of the tag combination
oneway = yes
oneway:Viatura Médica de Emergência e Reanimação (VMER) = no
? Did you mean oneway:emergency?
rui228 (2025-05-26 10:13:48+00:00): Hello. meschel mapper solved the problem. thanks for the troubleshooting.
regards
rui228 (2025-05-26 10:15:39+00:00): sorry i meant mueschel
Jrachi (2025-05-27 07:51:59+00:00): Ciao.
Nel tag ref si deve inserire il codice che identifica il percorso.
"Sentiero 92", visto il osmc:symbol che hai messo dovrebbe diventare:
ref=092

Ivo
loridave (2025-05-27 15:53:17+00:00): Grazie dei suggerimenti Ivo, 
Ho corretto questo e anche altre relazioni.
Lorenzo
loridave (2025-05-27 15:54:54+00:00): Il nome è sentiero 094A, perchè era errato il campo osmc:symbol.
george1201 (2025-05-25 20:55:10+00:00): Sorry, aber ich glaube nicht, dass der Außenbereich der Gaststätte einen eigenen Namen hat.
george1201 (2025-05-25 20:58:58+00:00): Laut Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=outdoor%20seating?uselang=de könnte man den Namen der Gaststätte im operator-Tag unterbringen (wenn man will).
george1201 (2025-05-27 21:37:58+00:00): Hab's so geändert.
tuan_gsm (2025-05-26 09:30:58+00:00): Đường này có bảng cấm ô tô 1 chiều sao bạn vẫn chỉnh thành 2 chiều vậy?
Hung159 (2025-05-26 13:56:43+00:00): Đường này xe máy vẫn được lưu thông 2 chiều mà bạn, vạch kẻ đường cũng là vạch vàng nét đứt để phân chia các làn đường ngược chiều, không có dải phân cách giữa
tuan_gsm (2025-05-27 02:55:49+00:00): Đường 2 chiều nhưng chỉ áp dụng cho xe máy, ô tô có bảng cấm 1 chiều bạn xem kỹ lại streetview đoạn đó lại với nha
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-25 15:00:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11065742447

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-05-25 16:33:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
PengualaHeadphones (2025-05-25 15:21:53+00:00): Note: This changeset was done using a Tablet.
BCNorwich (2025-05-25 18:03:52+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The tag would be building=bungalow not house=bungalow. I've made the corrections.

Regards Bernard.
silversurfer83 (2025-05-25 21:00:48+00:00): Hi Tony,

can you please explain in more detail, what you are trying to do here? For example: Why did you remove the nature reserve?

looking forward to your reply

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166739651
Fizzie-DWG (2025-09-01 02:46:30+00:00): DWG revert - deletion of existing features

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171293258
BCNorwich (2025-05-25 18:37:32+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I'm sorry to say that your mapping contains many mistakes, and a few warnings are given above. I've only looked at the first few features in this changeset and see many other mistakes: farmland inside farmland, farmland extending over roads, and some areas joined to the road center line. Then I noticed the 5-metre-high, 3-km-long cliff by Mill Road and Walpole Bank. 127 features added or altered in your very first changeset is not a sign that all will be well.

I don't have time now to correct anything but I thing because there are so many problems it might be best to revert and start again.

Regards Bernard.
eggie (2025-05-25 15:49:01+00:00): Dag Wytze.. Het zou zomaar kunnen, maar op een highway=footway mag je niet fietsen (G7 bebording) 
Zou het wellicht een highway=path zijn. Daar mag je wel fietsen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-25 15:56:07+00:00): Zie ook de verkeersbordenkaart. Er staat geen G7 bord
https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=53.090537122&lng=6.070311070&z=17
osmviborg (2025-05-25 15:45:17+00:00): 'O2' er det rigtige
andershl (2025-05-26 07:46:55+00:00): Fino...
Dimitar155 (2025-10-13 11:02:38+00:00): Здравей Termininja,

В Борисовата градина няма още 10 парка като way/1368130113. landuse=grass (или proposed;landuse=grass) би било по-правилно.

Поздрави,
Митко
Gerhard24 (2025-05-25 15:40:27+00:00): *Neues Umspannwerk und WC für Busfahrer an der Wendeschleife hinzugefügt.
kmpoppe_repair (2025-05-25 15:40:17+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 166727949.
Supaplex030 (2025-06-16 21:57:55+00:00): Mal wieder so eine witzige OSM-Begegnung... Geht man abends nochmal zum See spazieren und denkt sich: Ha, diese Rutsche hat bestimmt noch niemand gemappt... Doch, du, vor ein paar Tagen 😅

Naja, ich konnte wenigstens noch die Höhe und den Winkel der Rutsche ergänzen und das kleine Klettergerüst korrigieren.

LG - auch von Tobias - Alex (seit kurzem bei FixMyCity - ich hoffe wir lernen uns bald mal kennen :)
bicyclett (2025-06-17 13:19:49+00:00): hehe,
hatte mich damlas gewundert/gefreut dass die rutsche noch nicht drin war :)

falls du/ihr noch bisschen da seid:
der weg ab badestelle nach westen entlang des sees existiert und führt auf den eingetragenen feldweg, ist aber noch nicht in osm.

genieß die zeit da, ist wirklich sehr schön in und um neudorf
Supaplex030 (2025-06-20 12:35:28+00:00): Ach schade, hab deine Antwort zu spät gelesen und bin nicht mehr dort :(
Vinzenz Mai (2025-06-10 19:53:03+00:00): Hallo Steve,

warum entfernst Du korrekte Daten?

Danke
Vinzenz
SteveWannaRun (2025-06-13 20:34:06+00:00): Due to a municipal merger, there are currently two entries (or something else by a different name) for Hohen Neuendorf in OpenStreetMap. The larger one represents the current municipality, while the smaller one corresponds to the former municipality. In such cases, if both the old and new municipalities are linked to Wikidata, a display error may occur in the map on the Wikipedia article for the municipality (I can provide an example later, if I’m able to find one).
mueschel (2025-05-26 09:56:30+00:00): Hi,
'recycling:energy_waste' is not in use in other places - what does it mean?
Viima (2025-05-26 14:00:28+00:00): Hello.

I am not an expert on recycling, but "energiajäte" or energy waste is going to be burned for energy. Therefore anything that burns is suitable for energy waste. For example plastic, wood and cardboard can be put there if there is not a separate container for them. I considered recycling:waste but if I understood correctly recycling:waste includes also non-flammable materials. Do you have any tagging suggestions?

Here is the source I used: https://www.kierratys.info/energy-waste (hope it works abroad)
ivanbranco (2025-07-25 20:54:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169474020
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-25 20:44:22+00:00): dzięki za poprawki!