piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CAM-Gerlach (2025-07-25 09:54:02+00:00): Also, one observation: I see you renamed the "Orange Building" to "VT Parking Services", and I noticed there was another larger building directly north of it also named "Parking Services". The official VT map: https://campusmap.aws.gis.cloud.vt.edu/ (which I don't use directly for mapping, just citing as a reference here) names the latter as "Parking Services Building" and the former as Residence (Orange House), which it at least appears to be built as (building=detached) per Streetside, etc. To confirm, is former building also explicitly named Parking Services per your survey?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169415756
jplanc (2025-07-25 18:56:12+00:00): Hi, the Orange Building renaming was a mistake, I've reversed it. The new crosswalk does indeed use zebra markings. Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169415756
CAM-Gerlach (2025-07-26 00:01:12+00:00): Hey, thanks! Seems though that `crossing:markings` was set to `ladder` rather than `zebra` on the node (which seems a bit odd that VT would revert to using the old ladder markings rather than zebra that they use everywhere else at least for newly-painted crosswalks). Also, I see it wasn't updated on the way, leaving them out of sync. Which one did you intend? Thanks!
caseywittmier (2025-07-25 03:05:55+00:00): The address for Rock Creek Campground is a Highway 101 address. I changed it back. The USFS named the access road "Rock Creek Campground" in their data, but that is not used for addresses.
EggsTasteGood (2025-07-25 04:03:38+00:00): Thank you for correcting that.
rempshaener (2025-07-24 20:29:44+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3508735522: Hier wäre sinnvoll, auch noch die Kupplungsgrößen anzugeben, z. B. couplings:diameters=A;B;B
Zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13021473116: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie. 

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
aceman444 (2025-07-26 22:26:00+00:00): Dobry den, prosim piste trochu zmysluplnejsie popisy sad zmien, pozrite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn .

Ale kedze ste neodpovedali na moje hlasenia problemov s Vasimi zmenami a bol som miesto pozriet a Vase upravy nezodpovedaju realite, vsetky tieto zmeny vratim do povodneho stavu.
PanRojko (2025-07-29 17:14:29+00:00): Zle ste pozerali, napríklad, cyklistická trasa je vedľa VÚB banky smerom k autobusovej stanici nakreslená ako samostatná trasa. Je to oddelený chodník chodcov a cyklistov.

Križovatka Dunajská X Mlynské nivy má dnes iný tvar ako ste vrátili, rovnako aj ostrovčeky. 

Máte ale pravdu že nie som úplne skúsený, opravy som robil v dobrej viere.
aceman444 (2025-12-09 00:24:51+00:00): Cyklotrasa popri VUB nie je fyzicky oddelena od chodnika, je to podla dopravnej znacky chodnik pre pesich aj cyklistov len je segregovany (ciarou na ceste). takze staci znacka segregegated=yes a bicycle=designated a foot=designated na jednej OSM ceste.

Ak sa jemne zmenil tvar krizovatky Dunajska/Mlynske Nivy a tie ostrovceky, tak to uvidime ked budu na leteckych snimkach. Dovtedy su to len odhady od oka a kozmeticke zmeny ;) Ak aj zostane povodny stav, ale aspon tam nebudu routovacie problemy, ktore ste sposobili.
ilias_ (2025-07-25 15:08:57+00:00): that's not a park, just a residential garden
fs_LT (2025-07-25 11:06:01+00:00): global CS are annoying
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169416977
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-07-26 22:00:20+00:00): Please don't add fake roads
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169417052
TopoNick (2026-07-18 00:56:31+00:00): Hi there! I came across this changeset and was surprised to see "noexit=yes" tags at every driveway. I asked about this on the OSM Slack and it actually sparked quite the conversation (https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C2VJAJCS0/p1784232813774029). The consensus seems to be that this tag is not meant for driveways but rather for dead end streets. I am not going to revert anything but just wanted to make you aware of the discussion.
catsparrow (2026-07-18 03:38:55+00:00): Hello!

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Unfortunately, since I do not use Slack, I am unable to view the presumptively productive discussion (although I can imagine what was said).

As for the driveways, I have given thought to "noexit=yes" being put onto the ends and agree with the popular opinion. I have removed them from each and every driveway.

These driveways were created at a time when I was using the "FastDriveway" plugin for JOSM. This plugin automatically puts driveway tags on the way you select, "noexit=yes" being one of them. I focused more on the quantity of edits rather than the quality (i.e tags & making "sense" for OSM).
Sylabowy Kot (2025-07-30 21:46:16+00:00): Podawaj źródła danych i więcej informacji w opisie zmian - taka jest myląca - Nr jednostki wojskowej? Rembertów... Jak wyżej?! A nie, bo numer twojego zestawu zmian do OSM, obszar (a tu już nie jest Rembertów) i przeinaczona nazwa terenu, który ruszyłeś. Dlatego stosuj przecinki itp. i normalnie brzmiące zdania.

BTW edytor przeglądarkowy nie potrafi zapisać informacji, że mogłeś użyć zdjęć zacioniowanego terenu, jeżeli wysłałeś dane do OSM mając otwarte normalne zdjęcia lotnicze.
Mariusz 2M (2025-07-31 08:28:22+00:00): Strzelnica należy do 1. Warszwskiej Brygady Pancernej, ten rejon / lac jest ogrodzony jako poligon, ale np. część na wschód od samej jednostki już nie jest.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-07-31 10:21:48+00:00): Pamiętam, że ogólnie część terenu od strony drogi nie jest ogrodzona, przynajmniej zauważalnie, i są przedepty, jednakże widnieją odpowiednie znaki Teren wojskowy Wstęp wzbroniony. Tam problemem jest chyba głównie ryzyko oberwania rykoszetem, więc moża poanalizować jeszcze, co gdzie sięga i można wstawić też boundary=hazard hazard=shooting_range niezależnie od zakresu landuse=military. 

Fajnie, że też orientujesz się w tych rejonach, to możemy je rozbudować :) Jak widzisz, dodałem już strzelnicę CWKS i bardziej wojskową strzelnicę obok , bo to pierwsza rzecz, jaką się widzi po przejechaniu ASW i jest faktyczną przeszkodą terenową. To, co ty mówisz, brzmi na trochę wewnętrzną informację - swoją "Bojową Strzelnicę Piechoty" wziąłem z BDOT10k - taki tam publiczny rejestr danych geodezyjnych. Pamiętaj, by nie wyciągać zastrzeżonych informacji, chociaż to i tak śmiesznie wygląda, że możemy w OpenStreetMap zobaczyć np. zagospodarowanie terenu Jednostki GROM.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-07-31 10:29:45+00:00): W sumie łatwo się domyślić, że ta Brygada może tu stacjonować, jak jest blisko. Ogólnie te tereny wokół drogi pożarowej 48 sprawiają wrażenie wojskowych, jak da się tam natrafić na auta o wojskowych rejestracjach, jadące z/na poligony w głębi lasu, ale jak jedyny zakaz jest dopiero za CWKS...
Charlie Money (2025-07-24 21:51:12+00:00): also added some street relations for streets with several separate ways, forgot to add to Changeset desc.
tusooa (2025-07-29 13:22:06+00:00): Instead of making the fix to 2 m's you changed everything to 3 m's

operator=Toronto Transit Commmission

it should be
operator=Toronto Transit Commission
Jarek 🚲 (2025-07-30 18:46:57+00:00): sent DM to lastcommodore just now asking if they'll fix it
Jarek 🚲 (2025-07-30 19:29:32+00:00): (this has now been corrected by lastcommodore in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169736480 )
deni111bg (2025-07-25 12:35:11+00:00): i missunderstood so i split it into 4, now it should be fine
benoitdd (2025-09-09 07:50:34+00:00): hello, pour info les "pistes d'éducation routière" ont leur propre tag : amenity=traffic_park 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dtraffic_park
Max-Kritic (2025-09-09 17:23:35+00:00): Merci. Il y a 4 pistes de sécurité routière dans la CUA.

Geo80 a fait un reportage pour Beaurains.

Malheureusement, cela ne vaut pas le brevet du cycliste comme Pro Vélo le fait en Belgique pour apprendre aux enfants à rouler en rue dans la circulation.
kartograph (2025-07-27 16:56:47+00:00): Hi Mlvln :)

Die Straßenbefahrung von 2014 ist leider nicht mehr ganz aktuell. Hoffentlich gibt es mal eine neue :).

Ich hatte die Tage die Kreuzung um https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5352673474 nachgezeichnet. Auf den Straßenfotos ist ein neuer Verlauf (der Knick zum Abbiegen nach Rechts) zu sehen. Habe es mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169569733 wieder an die Fotos angepasst.

Viele Grüße
Mlvln (2025-07-28 10:24:27+00:00): Hi karthograph, 
ich habe nur die Bordsteine von den südlichen Blöcken im Reichenberger-Kietz nachgezeichnet und ab und an dabei auch auf die TrueOrtho-Fotos 2024 und die Orthofotos 2025 geschaut. An der Kreuzung Marianenstr./Skalitzer war ich gar nicht. Der Knick ist dort schon mehrere Jahre so als es mal Bus-SEV für die U1 gab. Vielleicht wurde das vorher nie in OSM geändert?
LG Mlvln
BCNorwich (2025-07-26 05:17:18+00:00): Several features were dragged out of alignment here, I think I've fixed them all.
skorasaurus (2025-07-27 16:36:39+00:00): hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM) and thanks for editing. 

There is already an existing node for Slavic Village so I have deleted your node. 
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/153932723) 

In OSM, we only map things once (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element); otherwise, it would be pretty confusing to have 2 slavic villages :D 

if you have any questions about OSM, feel free to contact me. 

regards,
will in cleveland

ps: i'm familiar with your organization and you do great work!
BCNorwich (2025-07-26 06:03:03+00:00): Duplicated highway removed
CAM-Gerlach (2025-07-25 08:40:19+00:00): Hey—I noticed the added building wasn't actually given the name "HAE Pods" (or `loc_name`, etc). Was that intentional?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169419783
jplanc (2025-07-25 19:00:36+00:00): That's what it is call colloquially but I'm not aware of an official name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169419783
CAM-Gerlach (2025-07-25 23:57:04+00:00): Ah, in that case it goes in `loc_name`, then; see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Local_names_(loc_name)

> loc_name=* is for the name of a feature as it is known locally, but only where this is deemed to be too much of a slang name or otherwise unofficial-sounding.
TrailJunkie (2025-08-01 17:00:24+00:00): Hi Melo_1,

I noticed you created some unnecessary highway links near the dual carriageway junction at way 1417045597 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1417045597), which is similar to the previous issue I reached out about in your changeset here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166388825

With satellite imagery and Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=523513060830713) showing no physically separated turn lanes here, the OSM Wiki recommends mapping the junction as a more simplified squared connection, like it was previously mapped. Here are some relevant OSM Wiki pages that may be helpful to reference:
*https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Junctions
    * This also contains a link to Mapbox’s recommendations: https://web.archive.org/web/20230602212339/https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-for-navigation/modeling-intersections-for-map-navigation/
*https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway#How_to_map
*https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link#Internal_turning_lanes

With these recommendations in mind, could you please consider mapping dual carriageway junctions similar to these examples in the future?

Thank you and please feel free to reach out if you have any questions!

TrailJunkie



Salut Melo_1,

Am observat că ai creat niște legături autostradale inutile lângă intersecția cu autostrada dublă de la punctul 1417045597 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141704559), ceea ce este similar cu problema anterioară despre care am contactat în setul tău de modificări aici: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/16638882 

Având în vedere că imaginile din satelit și Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=523513060830713) nu arată benzi de viraj separate fizic aici, Wiki OSM recomandă maparea intersecției ca o conexiune pătrată mai simplificată, așa cum a fost mapată anterior. Iată câteva pagini Wiki OSM relevante care ar putea fi utile pentru referință:
*https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Junctions
* Aceasta conține și un link către recomandările Mapbox: https://web.archive.org/web/20230602212339/https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-for-navigation/modeling-intersections-for-map-navigation/ 

*https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway#How_to_map 
*https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link#Internal_turning_lanes 

Având în vedere aceste recomandări, ați putea lua în considerare cartografierea intersecțiilor cu autostrăzi duble similare cu aceste exemple în viitor?

Vă mulțumesc și nu ezitați să ne contactați dacă aveți întrebări!

TrailJunkie
AntiCompositeNumber (2026-03-13 20:09:36+00:00): This changeset creates a "Newington Town Park" area, which contains a lot of non-park landuse. Please fix.
AdrienHegy (2025-07-25 06:18:52+00:00): Bonjour,
Je m’interroge sur les suppressions de chemin effectuées. Les chemins n’existent-ils vraiment plus ?
Si oui, compte-tenu de leur visibilité sur vue aérienne et d’autres jeux de données, l’utilisation de préfixe de cycle de vie aurait été intéressant.
Si non, pourquoi ces suppressions ? Il s’agit d’informations précieuses, notamment pour des secours.
Salutations,
Adrien
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-24 20:42:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1204885011

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_18023081 (2025-10-02 22:32:46+00:00): 69420

nice
rempshaener (2025-07-25 17:25:10+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe dazu ja schon mal was geschrieben.
Mal als Beispiel:
www.openstreetmap.org/way/1417053621
Wenn ich mir das hier ansehe: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1412987855754860&focus=photo&lat=51.231116533004&lng=6.779858089355&z=17 

Das ist sicherlich kein natural=wood. Das ist auch kein landuse=forest. Selbst natural=scrub ist grenzwertig. Es ist eine Mischung aus Wiese, Sträuchern, Beeten und Bäumen.

Viele Grüße
b-jazz (2025-07-25 05:04:32+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1416520860

When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. If you could go back and clean up where you've made this mistake, that would be helpful. But more importantly, if you could stop from doing this in the future, it would be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out.
BarryMyles (2025-07-24 20:46:14+00:00): Based on publicly available aerial photography of the site in April 2025. Progress seems to be happening quickly with the construction compound.
Glassman (2025-07-25 23:24:16+00:00): The node should be placed where the device is located not on the intersection. Because of the location I removed it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169422235
Glassman (2025-07-25 23:25:26+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169422235
Illinois_Roadbuff (2025-07-24 21:41:52+00:00): detail is crazy
danieldegroot2 (2025-07-24 21:45:29+00:00): Salut Mathieu65, (anglais ci-dessous)

As-tu inspecté les lieux sur place ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:V%C3%A9rifiabilit%C3%A9

N'utilise pas les données Google pour contribuer à OpenStreetMap, s'il te plaît. C'est interdit. Consulte cette page du wiki OSM (en anglais) :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

Si vous avez des questions sur la façon de cartographier, vous pouvez contacter votre communauté (locale) à l'adresse suivante :
https://openstreetmap.community/?map=52.63517,-7.04645&zoom=5.46
ou lancer un fil de discussion sur :
https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Bonne cartographie :-)

Cordialement,

Daniel

Traduit avec deepl.com/translator

---

Hey Mathieu65,

Did you survey the location on the ground?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:V%C3%A9rifiabilit%C3%A9

Do not use Google data for contributing to OpenStreetMap, please. It is prohibited. See this OSM Wiki page (in English)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If you have any questions on how to map, you can contact your (local) community at
https://openstreetmap.community/?map=52.63517,-7.04645&zoom=5.46
or start a thread on
https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Happy mapping :-)

Regards,

Daniel
danieldegroot2 (2025-07-24 21:55:21+00:00): Si vous avez inspecté le restaurant sur place (sur le terrain, de près) et que vous utilisez uniquement Google pour le montrer à d'autres personnes afin qu'elles puissent le vérifier, vous ou quelqu'un d'autre pouvez supprimer le lien source vers Google.
Nous pouvons utiliser les données du site web officiel du restaurant, s'il en possède un, pour contribuer à OpenStreetMap, mais uniquement si vous pouvez facilement vous rendre au restaurant pour vérifier ces données.
Notez que les balises source sont redondantes, vous devriez plutôt utiliser la source du changeset lorsque vous téléchargez les modifications dans l'application d'édition, bien que cela puisse encore être utile si le restaurant a récemment ouvert et n'est pas encore visible sur les images de rue, bien sûr.
Vous devez ajouter la balise website pour créer un lien vers le site web officiel s'il en existe un.
Sinon, vous pouvez toujours ajouter les réseaux sociaux avec les balises contact:*, c'est-à-dire contact:facebook, s'il en existe. (non, il n'y a pas de contact:google_maps..)

Si vous avez utilisé les données Google pour contribuer directement à OpenStreetMap, sans vérifier sur le terrain ou au moins en consultant le site web officiel, la modification doit être annulée (refaite) et/ou vous devez effectuer une vérification sur le terrain afin de pouvoir vérifier votre modification et la conserver dans OpenStreetMap.

---

If you did survey the restaurant on the ground (on location, from up close), and only use Google to show to others so they can verify it, then you or someone else can remove the source link to Google.
We can use data from the restaurant's official website, if it has one, for contributing to OpenStreetMap, but only if you can easily visit the restaurant to verify this data.
Note, source tags are redundant, you should use the changeset source when uploading the modifications in the editor application instead, though it can still be useful if the restaurant was recently opened and not visible on street level imagery yet, of course.
You should add the website tag to link to the official website if it has one.
Otherwise you can still add the social media with contact:* tags, i.e. contact:facebook, if it has those. (no, there is no contact:google_maps..)

if you used Google data to contribute to OpenStreetMap directly, without verifying by surveying on the ground, or at least by checking official website, then the modification should be reverted (undone) and/or you should survey it on the ground so you can verify your modification and it can be kept in OpenStreetMap.
danieldegroot2 (2025-07-25 13:49:38+00:00): Message privé reçu de l'utilisateur (en anglais ci-dessous)
«
Daniel,

je vous prie de m'excuser. Étant donné que vous avez apporté tant de contributions en Irlande, je suppose que votre langue principale est l'anglais. (Mais cela serait plus clair si la langue était indiquée sur nos profils OSM.)

Je m'y suis rendu : sur le menu, il était indiqué que le restaurant était ouvert de 17 h à 21 h 30. Le propriétaire m'a dit qu'il avait créé la page Google. Plus tard, j'ai vu sur la page Google que le restaurant était ouvert de 18 h à 21 h 30. J'ai donc téléphoné pour vérifier. 18 h est la bonne heure.

- Comme le propriétaire m'avait dit qu'il avait des problèmes avec les mauvais commentaires sur les anciens propriétaires, toujours affichés sur plusieurs sites web, j'ai essayé de l'aider en ajoutant ou en modifiant l'adresse sur quelques sites. Et plus tard, j'ai créé deux liens depuis la page OSM vers PagesJaunes.fr et Google. Mauvaise idée.

Encore une fois, je m'excuse.

Cordialement,
»

---

Received private message from user
"
Daniel,

my apologies. As you made so many contributions in Ireland, I suppose your main langage is english. (But it would be most clear if the langage was displayed on our OSM profiles.)

-I went there: on the menu, it was written opened from 17:00 to 21:30 (5pm to 9:30pm). The owner told me he had created the Google page. Latter I saw on the Google page, it was opened from 18:00 to 21:30. So I phoned to check. 18:00 is the good value.

-As the owner had told me he had problems with bad comments about the previous owners, still displayed on several web sites, I tried to help adding or changing the address on a few sites. And later, creating 2 links from the OSM page, to PagesJaunes.fr and to Google. Bad idea.

Again I apologize.

Best regards,
"

---

Erreur accidentelle corrigée dans /
Accidental mistake resolved in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169427386
Makeena (2025-07-24 21:33:23+00:00): Changes around Rumpelhalde and Nordheim
pavvv (2025-07-25 13:00:32+00:00): DDPiR bez fizycznej separacji mapujemy w sposób opisany na https://osm.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery
Pawix99 (2025-07-25 13:13:41+00:00): Przypadku gdy jest DDPiR mapowałem zgodnie z wiki, jako jedna ścieżka (np. DDPiR od strony ogródków działkowych). Odcinki zmapowane oddzielnie nie są DDPiR, lecz DDR (są oznaczone wyłącznie znakami C-13).
ff5722 (2025-09-15 08:27:10+00:00): The gate you tagged here should be ceremonial_gate=paifang, torii is for Japanese gates

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13021765306

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ceremonial_gate
Sylabowy Kot (2025-07-24 21:58:44+00:00): Zapomniało mi się, że dorysowałem też jakąś zieleń przy Bilbiotece Narodowej.
redd (2025-07-28 12:47:00+00:00): Hi Ygramul,
danke dir für die Erfassung der Gebäude in Neuschleichach und Lösung meiner Hinweise. 

Im Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4873617 wurde scheinbar der falsche Changeset verlinkt und ich war sehr verwirrt. Denn der verlinkte Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28110149 ist von 2015.

 Grüße,
redd
Hypsometric (2025-07-25 19:20:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Please take a look at the wiki about how to map gas stations. It looks like you tagged the convenience store as a gas station (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuel). Basically, most gas stations in the US have a gas station (roof where the pumps are) and a convenience store (where you can go in and pay for gas/buy stuff).
danieldegroot2 (2025-07-24 22:45:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19385743

Preferably simple polygons are added as area, not multipolygon, unless not otherwise possible, or prefered by the local community (which it is unlikely to be).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169424226