piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
fititnt (2023-11-23 20:47:14+00:00): Olá.

Esse changeset (que teoricamente seria até de validação, não de mapeamento inicial) deletou building=house de mapeador local.

E diferente do amenity=telephone que comentei em changeset/142038996 (que naquele caso, um telefone é pequeno para ser visto em imagem aérea, e até estava embaixo de árvores) tem elemento deletado que era perfeitamente visível, tanto é que os building=house apareceram depois como building=yes (mas isso feito por dois mapeadores que não são dessa região)

Se estiver difícil visualizar, esses são dois exemplos apenas desse changeset.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/575759860/history -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1213398211/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/575759940/history -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1216094589/history

Então pergunta, Alexandre: por que deletou esses dois elementos (antigos, verificados em solo, com mais detalhes) que até imagem aérea confirmava?
jmsbert (2023-12-22 23:17:19+00:00): Olá,
vias  (ways) restauradas que tinham sido criadas antes do #hotosm-project-15602 e que deveriam ter sido modificadas / corrigidas sem perder a história dos objectos: 
#575759860
#575759862
#575759940
Também foi devolvida a via (way) #1211698714, apesar de ter sido criada durante o projeto, mas pelo menos por um mapeador brasileiro, possivelmente local.
Espero que tudo está bem com este conjunto de alterações (changeset).
seeergiofdez (2023-10-05 16:15:36+00:00): Hey. Just a tip for next time: try to upload the changes before moving to the the next country or big areas. Makes it easier for reviewing changes. Thanks!
Shaun das Schaf (2023-10-05 17:31:34+00:00): Hallo btesche,

du hattest diese kleine Brücke hier beim Umbenennen übersehen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1038907702

Ich habe es noch korrigiert.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
mueschel (2023-10-18 17:35:48+00:00): Hi,
this lake got a strange 'OSM_name' tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6319672
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-05 16:20:19+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11241587924

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2023-10-06 10:51:09+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: Inaccurate mapped. 
Please check the way how to map a round building.
E. Rectangular buildings often not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142197411
Frans S (2023-10-06 10:30:26+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142197560
Glassman (2023-10-06 02:19:58+00:00): You may want to move the coastline to the outer edge of the beaches otherwise they won't render. FYI - Ideally, the coastline should represent the high tide line.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142197584
funwhilelost (2023-10-06 03:25:12+00:00): Thanks for the feedback! I’ll go adjust that outline. Is there a good way to represent a good inter-tidal area like that? In particular it helps to identify access points when landing via a dinghy.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142197584
Frans S (2023-10-06 10:47:57+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142197615
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 10:59:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143687914, 143687898, 143687891, 143687921 where the changeset comment is: Entfernung von Edits eines selbst-gelöschten Users
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 11:01:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143688019, 143688024, 143688006 where the changeset comment is: Entfernung von Edits eines selbst-gelöschten Users
literan (2024-12-21 11:05:27+00:00): по велодорожкам в РФ не запрещено перемещаться пешком, см. ПДД. Откачу
vorpalblade (2023-10-05 18:54:13+00:00): Hello again.

I don't know if you want to use a more advanced tool. If you don't, I'm sorry in advance about talking about a more advanced tool.

Assuming you do, JOSM ( https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ ) has a plugin called `utilsplugin2` that adds a `Circle arc` tool. This lets you take three points and generate a _pretty good_ curve for whatever you are mapping. I use it a lot when mapping a sidewalk going around a turning circle.

For reference on the difference to how it looks see:
* No circle arc: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11241305337
* Circle arc: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11241332135
eggie (2023-10-05 17:47:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Zouden die adressen ook niet meer bestaan? 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-10-05 17:51:43+00:00): De adressen heb ik hersteld.
MVG
eggie
StephaneP (2023-10-25 20:28:37+00:00): Bonjour €liz,

Je viens de regarder tes contributions sur la gare Tgv de Marne la Vallée, et j'avoue que je ne comprends pas.

le noeud railway= station comportait la note "ne pas ajouter public_transport=station car il est déjà présent sur l'emprise". Tu effaces cette note, et tu ajoutes public_transport=station.
Puis à un autre moment, tu supprimes l'emprise public_transport=station.

Les highway=footway sur les quais, deviennent des highway=corridor puis des quais (railway=platform), puis tu les effaces.

Les quais avaient perdu leurs tags level

Des highway=footway, devenus des highway=corridor (pourquoi pas mais il faudrait en parler avant) qui se retrouvent connectés à des voies ferrées, ou à des highway=corridor de niveaux différents.

Le noeud railway=station sur lequel tu as ajouté access=emergency ??

des highway=footway effacés, des emprises indoor=level effacés, etc.... etc...

Tout cela cassait complètement les affichages comme indoor equal, les rendus Transilien, Sncf, ainsi que les outils de routing.

Je ne sais pas si ces contributions sont volontaires (le rendu ?) si ce sont des erreurs de manip, ou un manque de compréhension, mais ça fait beaucoup d'erreurs dans la gare, et j'en vois pas mal d'autres autour aussi.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1079335944 ne peut pas être une forêt, ce serait vraiment tagger pour le rendu

https://www.osm.org/node/11237117545 a perdu son tag barrier=gate pour être remplacé par entrance=emergency. J'imagine que c'est une sortie de secours. Alors si la barrière existe toujours, il ne faut pas remplacer les tags "physiques" par ceux qui explicitent l'usage. Il faut les 2

https://www.osm.org/way/1214631360 qui est le inner d'un multipolygone highway=pedestrian, mais porte aussi le tag highway=pedestrian, ça n'a pas vraiment de sens.

Bon, là j'avoue, je suis clairement chafouin, car j'ai passé plus de 6 heures à tout réparer dans la gare.

Je voudrais juste que tu fasses beaucoup, beaucoup plus attention à tes contributions, surtout dans les zones mélangeant l'indoor et les transports en commun, qui sont vite très complexes. D'ailleurs, je pense qu'éditer dans ces zones avec iD est un peu suicidaire ; Josm me parait bien plus adapté. Bon oui, il faut un temps d'apprentissage, mais on regrette rarement cette transition.

Pour terminer, surtout, s'il y a des choses qui te chagrinent dans les contributions des autres, si tu t'interroges, etc... n'hésite pas à contacter les autres contributeurs, dans les commentaires de changeset, les messages privés, ou le forum FR : forum.openstreetmap.fr

Merci de ta compréhension et bon mapping.

Stéphane, pour Carto'Cité.
JezCrow (2023-10-17 00:12:23+00:00): That's a HUGE area of grass! Surely most of this is farmland, not grass?
Frans S (2023-10-06 10:46:09+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Objects without a roof, you can see both the shadow on the inside and the outside of an object, are not buildings and do not need to be mapped.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142198194
Frans S (2023-10-06 10:44:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142198322
Frans S (2023-10-06 10:43:10+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142198365
Frans S (2023-10-06 10:42:30+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142198385
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 04:13:08+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164878689
mcliquid (2023-10-06 06:54:53+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Frans S (2023-10-06 10:26:28+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142198489
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 10:59:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143687914, 143687898, 143687891, 143687921 where the changeset comment is: Entfernung von Edits eines selbst-gelöschten Users
Frans S (2023-10-06 10:27:28+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Be careful to map objects without a roof or where you see shadows on both outside and inside.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142198563
Frans S (2023-10-06 09:28:16+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
Objects without a roof, you can see both the shadow on the inside and the outside of an object, are not buildings and do not need to be mapped.
You do see trees here with a small white object half under them. I would interpret these as a building, although you can't see the shadow.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142198613
Tatfahren (2025-04-08 12:12:03+00:00): Hallo CaptainCarte,
die maproulette challenge war so gedacht, das falsche Tore korrigiert werden, jedoch durch das setzen eines korrekten Tags, anstatt sie einfach durch "barrier=fence" zu ersetzen. So wird der Fehler nur zu einem schwieriger findbaren Fall. Kannst du dich noch erinnern ob du das nur in diesem Fall so gemacht hast, oder bei allen erledigten Quest ein "barrier=fence" draus gemacht hast?

In diesem fall war zweifelsfrei "highway=path" richtig, und der falsche barrier tag hätte nur gelöscht werden müssen.
CaptainCarte (2025-04-08 14:32:54+00:00): Habe mir meine Änderungen Stichprobenartig aus der challenge angeschaut, konnte dabei keine Auffälligkeiten erkennen. Habe überall nach bestem wissen korrigiert. In diesem Fall hab wahrscheinlich einfach falsch gesehen.
Tatfahren (2025-04-08 14:41:52+00:00): Danke fürs nachsehen, dann sollte der Rest ja passen.
Frans S (2023-10-06 09:23:17+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped.  
However: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142199121
NieWnen (2023-10-05 23:01:47+00:00): Skąd informacja, że to jest Skwer im. Józefa Piłsudskiego?
Geoportal wskazuje na Park Anielin jako poprawną lokalizację (nazwa alternatywna), co z resztą jest już zmapowane.
kamilbogacki (2023-10-25 07:18:47+00:00): Nazwa skweru jest w bazie PRNG.
NieWnen (2023-10-25 19:25:44+00:00): Faktycznie. Wygląda na to, że mają rozbieżność w danych urzędowych.

Wysłałem pismo do urzędu. Dam znać jak dostanę odpowiedź.
NieWnen (2023-12-22 20:55:43+00:00): Dostałem odpowiedź od urzędu (za 2 razem się udało). 

Nie ma tutaj takiego skweru, jest poprawnie zmapowany obok. To błąd PRNG. UM Pruszków wysłał pismo do GUGiK, żeby to poprawili.
Ben Dezar 2 (2023-12-22 23:27:59+00:00): To dobrze, bo obecny stan może wprowadzać w błąd.
kamilbogacki (2023-12-23 16:16:02+00:00): Baza PRNG podobnie jak BDOT jest poprostu niedoskonała.
silversurfer83 (2023-10-06 05:41:36+00:00): Moin :)
Zu deiner Reviewanfrage: Ich hätte den Abschnitt an der Stelle wo die östliche der beiden aus norden kommenden Parkplatzzufahrten ankommt aufgeteilt. Ansonsten könnte das passen :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142199275
wies1 (2023-10-06 06:27:00+00:00): Guten Morgen
danke für deine Mitteilung. Warum hälst du eine Teilung bei der östlichen Parkplatzausfahrt für sinnvoll? Ich habe die Teilung da vorgenommen, wo die - wie soll ich sagen - die "mittlere" Fahrspur quasi die Fahrtrichtung wechselt. Man könnte aber durchaus noch eine weitere Teilung vornehmen, wo du es vorgeschlagen hast.
Gruss
wies1
iDylan (2023-10-05 17:33:21+00:00): Le square des Anciens Combattants d'Afrique du Nord se trouve beaucoup plus au sud et non sur le Parc du Château.
Geo-Tobi (2023-11-20 22:32:26+00:00): Hallo landini,
du hast hier offenbar Access=private ergänzt.
Kannst du dich bitte zu folgender Note äußern?:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3995832#map=17/47.95048/11.97335&layers=N
Danke
ivanbranco (2023-10-06 08:58:47+00:00): Salve LupoRosso, hai mosso una fontanella alle coordinate 0,0. 

Non é la prima volta che accade con questo editor (refill.bz), forse ti ricordi cosa hai fatto per farlo accadere in modo da ricreare questo problema e segnalarlo ai programmatori? Li ho avevo giá avvisati tempo fa che il loro editor muoveva elementi alle coordinate 0,0 ma mi risposero che é un problema degli utenti e non del loro editor.
LupoRosso (2023-10-06 09:08:16+00:00): Salve, per diversi giorni l'editor refill.bz non visualizzava la mappa (ho segnalato all'assistenza di refill). Anche senza vedere la mappa sul cellulare ho tentato di inserire una nuova fontanella utilizzando la geolocalizzazione. Probabilmente senza mappa visibile non ha salvato le coordinate. Nel frattempo la mappa su refill.bz è nuovamente visibile e la geolocalizzazione mi fa vedere correttamente la mia posizione.
geo_graph (2023-10-05 17:53:29+00:00): hours :-)
Fischkopp0815 (2023-10-06 02:53:45+00:00): Moin Stefan,

Ich melde mich hier,weil du die Fährstelle Burg frisch bearbeitet hast. Es betrifft aber auch die von mir und anderen bearbeiteten  Fährstellen Sehestedt, Hohenhörn und Hochdonn. An diesen Fährstellen gibt es jeweils 2 Anleger:Den meist benutzten ( sicher 95%+) Spitzfährenanleger und den nur in Ausnahmefällen benutzten Klappenfährenanleger. Es gibt für den gesamten Kanal nur eine Fähre, die den Klappenfährenanleger benutzen kann. Deshalb finde ich die jetzt suggerierte Gleichwertigkeit der beiden Anlegertypen nicht gut. Hast du eine Idee wie man das ändern kann? Ev. die Klappenfährenverbindung sogar mit Lifecycleprefix disused: versehen?
StefanHRT (2023-10-06 04:56:33+00:00): Moin, Irgendwie hatte ich schon mit gerechnet dass Du Dich hierzu meldest ;)
stimmt, ich habe den 2ten Anleger "aktiviert" da wir gestern diesen nutzen mussten (und augenscheinlich ist dieser schon länger aktiv). Das mit disused wäre eine gute Lösung, aber da die Relationen noch nicht "gedoppelt" sind, habe ich da noch nichts gemacht. Evtl. findest Du als Kundiger auch genauere Infos wie lange die neue Fähre aktiv ist. VG
Fischkopp0815 (2023-10-06 06:25:47+00:00): Stand 2023-10-06 8:20

Die Klappenfähre Nobiskrug ist wieder auf der Ruheposition in Hochdonn
https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/home/shipid:142008/zoom:17

In Burg verkehrt die Spitzfähre Tilsit
https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/home/shipid:135084/zoom:14

Also wieder Normalbetrieb.
StefanHRT (2023-10-06 06:44:58+00:00): mhh ok, so schnell kann es sich wieder ändern. Hochdonn hatte ich ja nichts gemacht, sonst wären da auch die Schranken eingetragen und zwischen den Schranken ein bicycle=dismount anstelle bicycle=yes (gemäß Beschilderung) ;)
eserte (2023-10-05 18:28:11+00:00): Hi! Ist die smoothness hier <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32533959> tatsächlich nicht besser geworden?
Frans S (2023-10-06 09:22:14+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
However: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142200934
sis651 (2023-10-09 18:14:38+00:00): Malkara bina çizimi için çok uzun zamandır planımda olan bir yerdi ama pek vaktim yok diye hiç girişmedim toplu olarak. Bina girişlerinin yapılıyor olması güzel.
kwiatek_123 (2023-10-05 19:46:13+00:00): Do https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23589334 dodałeś tag footway=sidewalk, którym oznacza się chodnik idący wzdłuż ulicy. A tutaj ulicy nie widać.
kwiatek_123 (2023-10-05 19:48:08+00:00): Z peruna zniknęła nazwa. W sumie czemu?
GanderPL (2023-10-05 20:06:35+00:00): Perun SA się przeniósł. Myślałem, że ta nazwa odnosiła się do niego.
kwiatek_123 (2023-10-05 20:09:46+00:00): Ja bym może zostawił albo połączył z innym tagiem bo wydaje mi się, że to taka bardziej lokalna lub rozpoznawalna, historyczna nazwa. Coś jak FSO.