piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aceman444 (2023-07-17 15:37:43+00:00): Hej, len v minulej verzii ste nevedeli kde su tie vchody a ste si ich vymysleli, preto som to vratil spat :) Teraz teda OK.

Inak to pravidlo je, ze nie ze ma viacero vchodov (to maju aj tie cinziaky predny a zadny, ale s rovnakou adresou), ale ze budova ma viacero adries. Tak tie rozne adresy date na vchody alebo ak neviete, tak niekam do budovy. Viacero adries znamena rozne supisne cislo (addr:conscriptionnumber), alebo rovnake supisne cislo ale rozne orientacne cislo (addr:streetnumber).
Ak ale najdete budovu s adresami s roznymi supisnymi cislami, tam uz ide o viacero budov a mozeme to v OSM rozdelit na viac budov podla katastra. Len dajte vediet keby ste na take narazili.
vlakos555 (2023-07-17 15:59:17+00:00): Chápem. Zle som sa vyjadril. Samozrejme ide o viac adries v objekte. 
Ďakujem.
benjaco (2023-08-12 23:00:09+00:00): Hvad er idéen i at mappe cykelstien i Tom Kristensens Vej rundkørslen seperat? Cykelstien er allerede registreret på https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18578799, og er ikke separate med anden belægning
kortgodt (2023-08-13 03:50:19+00:00): Godt spottet. Jeg tilføjede egentligt bare Universitetsruten til rundkørslen da Ørestadsruten allerede allerede var tilføjet den separate cykelsti rind i rundkørslen. Du retter endelig bare til. Jeg er ikke lige ved en computer så har ikke muligheden pt.
b-holdet (2023-08-13 10:53:36+00:00): Historikken på stien viser at den stammer fra CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126174276
Så det er en anden mapper "Supercykelstier", der har oprettet den og ikke "kortgodt". Vedkommende har 7 CS, så det er fuldt forståeligt at han ikke har opdaget den lille finte med tagget.
benjaco (2023-08-13 11:27:25+00:00): Ja, det er helt fair. Jeg smider relationen over på den rigtige vej, og fjerne den separate sti
benjaco (2023-08-13 11:52:35+00:00): rettet her https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139820346
eggie (2023-07-13 14:33:50+00:00): Dag Niels.. een naam doet niets in osm. Geef de aard van de instelling aan. Bv amenity=social_facility

Mvg
eggie
user_5359 (2023-07-13 14:54:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/node/11044117616. We use the 24 hours notation for opening_hours and service_times. Without any weeekday shortcut the services is every day (not only Sunday).
user_5359 (2023-07-13 15:06:21+00:00): Additional information: I merge the information with the church building, see https://www.osm.org/way/544255826
eggie (2023-07-13 14:35:33+00:00): Niels... Dit doet niets.. Zoek in de wiki welke tag hier bij hoort.
Mvg
eggie
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-07-13 19:35:34+00:00): Hi, what's the point of moving bus platforms?
romanzone (2023-07-13 20:28:05+00:00): At some bus stops, there are bicycle paths now and platforms moved. Also, names of multiple bus stops were not visible.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-07-14 17:30:24+00:00): Well we shouldn't move stuff too much because some label is not visible. It's up to the renderer to display stuff however it wants. Some app may prioritize those names and display them on top. 

But I assume often the reason for this are bus stops which were micromapped as buildings. I'm not really sure they are buildings...
Bobropiton (2023-07-16 17:45:40+00:00): Again, someone started to edit/move the bus platforms from iD... Plz, do not edit points of platforms
k4be (2023-07-13 20:06:13+00:00): Obszedłem dziś resztę czarnego szlaku, i miałem właśnie aktualizować dane, ale widzę, że byłeś szybszy :) Dzięki!
Czy na pewno dobrym pomysłem było usunięcie relacji nr 15843391 (trasa prowadząca ekstremalnie stromą ścieżką na szczyt Gomólnik Mały)? Oznaczenia w terenie dziś około godziny 18 z pewnością były jeszcze widoczne.
matix849 (2023-07-13 22:20:32+00:00): Przedwczoraj się wybrałem na szybką wycieczkę jak przestało padać :D
Co do usuniętej relacji to uznałem, że w większości dubluje nowe szlaki, no i była oznaczona jednak dość słabo w terenie. Teraz myślę, że faktycznie może dobrym pomysłem będzie przywrócenie chociaż przebiegu przez "Muflonową perć". W ciągu dnia do tego przysiąde w wolnej chwili :)
k4be (2023-07-14 04:17:17+00:00): Może warto byłoby, zamiast "białego ludzika" zmapować trasę "pomarańczowa strzałka" oznaczoną tablicami jak poniżej? Niestety nie zrobię tego z pamięci, bo nie wiem, gdzie jest początek i gdzie koniec. Swoją drogą, symbol roweru na tej drodze to chyba delikatna przesada.
https://k4be.eu/obrazki/Gluszyca-11-07-2023/P7110274.JPG
ibanez (2023-07-13 14:08:21+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM. Da Gebäude gewöhnlich rechtwinklig gebaut sind, ein kleiner Tipp: Im ID Editor den Umriss auswählen und Taste Q drücken. 
Viele Grüße
Jens
Frans S (2023-08-14 13:06:49+00:00): * Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings and don't change correct taggings.
Best regards
mueschel (2023-07-14 08:42:51+00:00): Hi,
something went wrong here. You uploaded a huge amount of objects with strange tags like "confidence".

Where can we find the required documentation of the import?

Please check the import guidelines to see how importing data to OSM works.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
user_5359 (2023-07-14 14:54:30+00:00): Hello,

In comparison with the aerial photo, you seem to have tried to import building outlines (presumably with automatic image recognition). The question remains open whether the procedure was coordinated and the source images were approved for this processing. And when are the correct tags set and the superfluous ones deleted?

see also https://www.osm.org/changeset/138484106

tradução automática

Hi,
algo correu mal aqui. Carregou uma enorme quantidade de objectos sem qualquer etiqueta adequada.
Qual é a fonte de todos estes dados?
Onde é que podemos encontrar a documentação necessária para a importação?

Consulte as directrizes de importação para saber como funciona a importação de dados para o OSM.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Olá,
Em comparação com a fotografia aérea, parece ter tentado importar os contornos dos edifícios (presumivelmente com reconhecimento automático de imagem). Resta saber se o procedimento foi coordenado e se as imagens de origem foram aprovadas para este processamento. E quando são definidas as etiquetas correctas e eliminadas as supérfluas?

ver também https://www.osm.org/changeset/138484106
ianlopez1115 (2023-07-13 13:47:20+00:00): *[Minabuyoc, Talavera]
VA00 (2023-07-26 07:44:45+00:00): Czy droga jest faktycznie zamknięta i niedostępna na całej długości? Jak dojeżdża się do miejscowości po drodze? Zmiana primary->residential to też nieco dziwny pomysł.
Olga | Yanosik (2023-07-26 08:21:45+00:00): Na odcinku drogi pomiędzy DW 964 a m. Dobra edytor dodał access-destination. Na odcinku bezpośredniego osuwiska (wg danych GDDKiA) dodałam teraz access-no.
Yunkers (2023-07-26 08:30:59+00:00): Kategorię dróg zmieniałem ja, to wynika z tego że przeniosłem primary na objazd, żeby nawigacje wiedziały jak prowadzić. Nie wydaje się też żeby ten objazd miał szybko zniknąć, więc chyba nie ma sensu trzymać primary na dojazd do domów.
VA00 (2023-07-26 10:33:14+00:00): To gdzie w końcu jest osuwisko: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1y1H ? Gdzie stoi zakaz ruchu B-1?
alix_geovelo (2023-07-13 13:44:46+00:00): pardon, bug d'envoi du changeset précédent.
limes11 (2023-07-14 15:44:07+00:00): Hi

woher stammen denn diese Bezeichnungen der Parkplätze? Die verlinkte Webseite hilft nur bedingt weiter. Falls die etwas mit dem Thema zu tun hat, dann sollte der Link präzisiert werden. Auf den ersten Blick ist da kein Zusammenhang zu sehen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3779412

VG Limes
cotesta (2023-09-30 19:17:25+00:00): Change reverted in 141964829.

Muskingum County Auditor map (https://www.muskingumcountyauditor.org/RealEstate/Map) does not show the road itself extending this far in.

A clear hitch in paving exists in aerial imagery, the road has been extended to there, with the rest changed back to driveway. Thank you for your contributions.
arjunaraoc (2023-07-17 11:08:07+00:00): Which directionality is changed is not clear. Do not ignore crossing ways
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138466266
syedk (2023-07-17 13:32:56+00:00): Tertiary Road has changed to One way
arjunaraoc (2023-07-18 04:33:05+00:00): Please provide the URL for the Tertiary Road.  Usually tertiary roads are not unidirectional. Unless you have direct knowledge of the road and can validate with another Tertiary or Residential road which provides way for opposite direction, it may be better not to make such changes.
arjunaraoc (2023-07-18 04:34:35+00:00): Please provide changeset URL which fixes the issued raised, in your response.
syedk (2023-07-18 06:16:00+00:00): Thank you for highlighting.We have made changes as per our Inner Evidences.Now Changes are updated.

URL - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138649640#map=16/9.1862/77.8616&layers=C
arjunaraoc (2023-07-19 07:57:14+00:00): Thanks for updating.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138466266
whb (2023-07-13 14:25:32+00:00): Guten Tag,

könntest du bitte erklären, warum du alle Wege im Friedrichspark mit dem Namen "Friedrichspark" versehen hast?
Ein Weg durch einen Park trägt nicht automatisch den Namen des Parks.

Viele Grüße
whb
Duracellpt (2023-07-21 16:39:09+00:00): Olá! Bem-vindo ao OSM.

A criação desta área deu origem a vários erros.

Foram criadas duas relações que transformam esta área num só edifício, o que está errado.

Definiu a área como uma quinta de produção agrícola que não existe no local.

Não deverá ser utilizado o nome em maiúsculas.

Editou a geometria da ecovia paralela à Rua Artur Aires.

Agradecia que corrigisse os erros, caso precise de ajuda é só dizer ;)

Cumprimentos.
eggie (2023-07-13 19:13:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse (2023-07-31 21:28:48+00:00): Hello,
You've removed the fixme from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1938753682/history , but where does the public footpath go from there?
Cheers,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2023-07-31 21:29:32+00:00): Also the public bridleway https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1306588297/history
SomeoneElse (2023-07-31 21:32:51+00:00): Also, the fixme for the link through the FC area at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3599179640/history .
Nathan_A_RF (2023-07-31 22:19:16+00:00): It appears from the imagery that the paths are already connected and there are no stubs, so that's why I removed these fixme tags
SomeoneElse (2023-07-31 23:21:48+00:00): The first two fixmes weren't about path connections but about public footpath and public bridleway signage.  When you surveyed this, did you notice where they pointed?

The third one was just about a connecting trail on FC land that formed the third side of a triangle.
Nathan_A_RF (2023-07-31 23:31:36+00:00): For the first two, the paths are continuous. There's no dead end for the public footpath/bridleway. They both go from a service road to a dedicated path. The fixmes didn't mention signage. For the latter, there is no visible trail on the imagery. If you think anything there is wrong then re-add the fixme tags.
SomeoneElse (2023-08-01 01:00:44+00:00): >  If you think anything there is wrong then re-add the fixme tags.

Thanks, I've done that.

> The fixmes didn't mention signage

I didn't mention signage because I can't imagine anyone would edit public footpaths or bridleways without actually going there and looking at signage!  A "public footpath" or a "public bridleway" is inherently a legal concept that is reflected in signs along paths, tracks and roads on the ground.
arjunaraoc (2023-07-17 05:40:51+00:00): This looks ok, if you have first hand knowledge of the location.  As the  poi is already existing as node cochin cement limited (8397094681), that needs to be deleted.  Also as it is a factory, it would be useful if you can map the driveway road to it.
arjunaraoc (2023-12-29 05:21:20+00:00): Resolved vide https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145646044
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138468518
eggie (2023-07-14 09:42:09+00:00): Dag Joeri.. 
Je vraagt feedback..
Lijkt me oke zo.
Groet
eggie
J-D-R (2023-07-14 10:49:23+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
Mooi, bedankt!
Groeten Joeri
mueschel (2023-07-17 10:31:49+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM! I looks like you tried to add a bus route here. Unfortunately the way you did it is not quite right - we can't add a new line on top of the map, but we need to add a relation that makes use of existing ways.
The tagging scheme is described here: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dbus

The best way to learn how its done is to look at existing bus routes, they should be easy to find.

If you have questions, the best place to ask for assistance is the OSM community forum.
eggie (2023-07-13 19:14:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
tsp15 (2023-10-14 22:07:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674228136#map=17/50.49165/19.39781 Droga trzeciorzędna zamieniona na ciąg pieszo-rowerowy. O co tutaj chodzi?
CRCulver (2023-10-14 22:25:48+00:00): Sorry. This has been corrected in changeset 142594168. I'm surprised this wasn’t caught by one of the scripts that the Polish OSM community runs.
Dawid2849 (2023-10-14 23:05:38+00:00): We have RSS channel about road changes, but there are so many changesets that I don't thing anybody checks it
silversurfer83 (2023-07-14 06:55:25+00:00): Moin :)

du möchtest, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht. Gerne.
Sieht grundsätzlich gut aus. Um darzustellen, dass es sich noch im Bau befindet (oder ähnlich) kann man die Lifecycle Prefixes nutzen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
In diesem Fall könnte man aus "amenity=cinema" ein "construction:amenity=cinema" oder "planned:amenity=cinema" machen.
Was auch immer sehr hilfreich für andere Mappende ist: Eine Quellenangabe für deine Änderung. Die fehlt in deinem Kommentar. Sowas kannst du vor dem Upload unter dem Kommentarfeld noch zusätzlich angeben.
Letzte Frage: Woher weißt du, dass das Kino für Rollstuhlfahrer praktisch barrierefrei ist wenn es noch gar nicht eröffnet hat?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138471158
ovruni (2023-07-14 00:38:32+00:00): Hola EdisonIrwin, ¿Cual es el motivo para eliminar el nodo de la municipalidad?
Saludos
EdisonIrwin (2023-07-14 01:43:15+00:00): El principal motivo de ello, es por que la municipalidad distrital de Cusipata no se ubica ahí, ese lugar corresponde a un tienda. La municipalidad se encuentra en la plaza de armas.
AgusQui (2023-08-23 04:55:20+00:00): hola dazgtg, corregí la linea 271 que creaste: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16201443
Cualquier duda sobre como mapear colectivos u otras cosas avisame.
Kai Johnson (2023-07-14 15:12:00+00:00): I think the convention would be to use all lower case for tag values: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like#Syntactic_conventions_for_new_tags
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138472011
NieWnen (2023-07-13 18:22:45+00:00): `proposed:building=*`
`building=proposed` nie jest nawet poprawne – jest nierekomendowane wg wiki

ale proszę nie dodawaj w ten sposób, już lepiej uwagę niż zupełnie inny tag
syntex (2023-07-13 18:22:59+00:00): Co? Przecież to świadome dodawanie błędnych danych
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-13 17:00:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5974177302

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-10-08 18:19:02+00:00): isso não é track: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1189441697#map=17/-16.60895/-49.72050
ovruni (2023-07-14 00:08:30+00:00): Hola, desconozco la fuente que ha usado para agregar alturas de esta zona, difícilmente creer que se encuentra sobre el terreno.
Saludos
Colin Smale (2023-07-13 20:29:15+00:00): Hi!
Where did you get your village boundaries from? They seem to duplicate civil parishes which are legally defined, but a "place" is a much vaguer concept.
eggie (2023-07-13 19:18:52+00:00): Dag Helena...  Routeren doet het helaas niet meer.
Wanneer je fietspaden verwijdert en de hoofdrijbaan op slot laat staan voor fietsers is de routering stuk,
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=138473746

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-13 19:41:31+00:00): Ik heb het weer routeerbaar gemaakt en de fietspaden op de juiste plek gelegd. 
Tip Kruip in de huis van een fietser en kijk dan eens welke accesstags op zo'n overgebleven weg staan. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-13 20:13:45+00:00): Typo Kruip in de huid van....
HelenaB85 (2023-07-14 09:30:10+00:00): Dank eggie.
partytax (2023-07-18 16:11:41+00:00): I will be deleting this because if you use it during school hours you will die. Also, the southern curb ramp doesn't even face north toward the other side of this supposed unmarked crossing. It rolls wheelchairs directly into the Memorial Avenue slaughtering zone.
gpserror (2023-07-18 21:09:26+00:00): discussion at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138677566
falcone13 (2023-07-13 19:04:42+00:00): This road segment is now open for traffic. Can you or someone else "open" this road on openstreetmaps? Thanks.
axdx (2023-07-17 06:18:51+00:00): Мб исправите опечатку в поле operator? У вас название банка с ошибкой.
parukhin (2023-07-17 13:09:16+00:00): Подскажите, какого банка?
Там ещё много ошибок, постепенно буду исправлять.
Barroszt (2023-07-14 00:53:47+00:00): Dziękuję za poprawienie nazwy.
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-13 18:18:13+00:00): Revert changeset didn't work

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138475016
Mingwei (2023-07-17 02:52:51+00:00): definitely should be sidewalk=separate
BubbaJuice (2023-11-05 17:23:14+00:00): I will be reverting this changeset because you clearly did not check recent imagery before making this change
BubbaJuice (2023-11-05 17:25:04+00:00): Not really your fault actually, another user moved it away from where it really is after I first added it
JackNUMBER (2023-11-06 10:53:36+00:00): Hello, can you tell what is the most recent imagery in this area. thank you
BubbaJuice (2023-11-06 14:24:12+00:00): Esri, followed by Bing, followed by NAIP. You can do Ctrl+shift+B in iD to see imagery metadata and that sometimes includes dates of when it's from.
oba510 (2023-07-24 09:06:26+00:00): I was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, so I walked through here this weekend.  Bostonship Plaza has not been turned into a grass park.  There is no grass. Nothing has changed.
oba510 (2023-07-16 07:52:37+00:00): The two are not mutually exclusive.  It's actually fairly common for pedestrian plazas to have some form of seating.

The seating area only occupies part of the plaza, btw, and is already mapped here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979811982
jxpsert (2024-09-22 07:53:30+00:00): Hoi! Wat is je bron voor de straatnaam "De oversteek"?
MxxCon (2023-07-14 04:13:49+00:00): Hello.
The way you mapped sidewalks is incorrect. Just becuase there's a driveway, doesn't mean SIDEWALK should get a node of lowered curb. Lowered curb is not on the sidewalk, it's on the driveway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138476190
BCNorwich (2023-07-17 07:04:35+00:00): Hi, You've placed most of Way: Ducks Unlimited Park Loop (1189459830) on top of existing highways. This makes duplicated highway lines that can disrupt routing. In cases like this the existing highway should be amended to hold all the highway information.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2023-07-26 18:57:59+00:00): All fixed now and a route relation made.
fndoder (2023-07-13 23:37:05+00:00): > amenity	fixme
> fixme	type
> fixme:type	hookah_lounge

Тут, похоже, опечатки в тегировании.
Emilius123 (2023-07-13 20:25:06+00:00): Danke dir. Ist wichtige, aber trotzdem sehr oft übersehen Arbeit.
Mashin (2023-07-13 20:03:08+00:00): Hi,
The question is why did you remove information about operator and power lines designation from this section of power lines? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101289577
mguerini (2023-07-13 20:30:11+00:00): Hello. 
I'm sorry, it wasn't my intention, I ended up mistaking my action and didn't see it.
Glassman (2023-07-14 00:26:15+00:00): I added back the operator to the power line in northern Oregon
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138476381
Mashin (2023-07-14 06:20:06+00:00): @mguerini All good, thanks for clarification!
eggie (2023-07-13 20:01:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
ovruni (2023-07-14 00:38:35+00:00): Hola, ¿Cual es el motivo para eliminar edificios aquí?
Saludos
EdisonIrwin (2023-07-14 01:50:16+00:00): Con respecto a dicha acción, al realizar el mapeo de edificios en mi respectivo área de trabajo lo elimine por error. Al finalizar la tarea me di cuenta del error.
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:52:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143713927, 143713921 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits eines benutzers nach selbstlöschung
MxxCon (2023-07-14 04:26:14+00:00): Hello.
These kind of areas are not really necessary to map if the buildings are already mapped and properly tagged.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138476882
ovruni (2023-07-14 01:01:47+00:00): Hola, en todos sus conjuntos de cambios se han agregado nombres descriptivos como edificación, número de pisos y alturas como valor de 0, por lo que he revertido sus conjuntos de cambios.
Saludos
NKA (2023-07-28 06:07:22+00:00): Det er mange landuse=meadow fra forrige import som overlapper med landuse=farmland etter den siste importen i Aurland.

Eksempel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310352342
NKA (2023-07-28 06:08:35+00:00): En del annet som heller ikke er flettet, bl.a. natural=grassland.
harahu (2023-07-31 11:23:38+00:00): Er bevisst det problemet. Jeg rydda opp i noen av disse under importen men fant at det var utfordrende å avgjøre om `landuse=meadow` er mer korrekt enn `landuse=farmland`. Jeg så også at en del av områdene tagget `natural=grassland` ikke var var korrekte. Jeg tenker at alle disse i praksis trenger manuell og relativt forsiktig gjennomgang, som er tidkrevende, og ville ikke blokke importen pga det. Tenker å rydde opp i disse i tiden framover. Bare å hjelpe til hvis du har lyst.
NieWnen (2023-07-14 16:27:05+00:00): Please don't add `addr:country` tag in Poland. It's unwanted.
Bienson (2023-07-13 20:34:39+00:00): Wurde dieser Garagenhof abgerissen?
Cowboy79 (2023-07-13 20:45:06+00:00): Nein.
Meiner Meinung nach handelt es sich hier nicht um eine größere Anlage oder einen "Hof", sondern lediglich um ein paar Auffahrten.
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:34:35+00:00): гівнюк!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:39:02+00:00): до стінки тебе, гада москальського!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:39:33+00:00): ненавиджу тебе, собака
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:43:02+00:00): Що ти твориш, що за назви!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:54:15+00:00): Москальські імена додаєш? Стройка, тьху! Побійся Бога!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:01:48+00:00): огидно
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:10:05+00:00): просто засранець
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:12:29+00:00): У тебе є офіційні фото місцевості де написано що місцевість має назву "стройка"?
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:29:30+00:00): засланець!