piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
lalgonzales (2026-07-15 05:34:02+00:00): I got the wiki; you can review it at:
has presenciado unos de estos multiples y magnificos ejemplos de alertas comunitarias , que tiene el fin de garantizar calidad: un usuario ha visto tus cambios, se da cuenta que es parte de un mapaton, y exige sber de qué se trata y si este mapaton ha seguido las reglas de transparencia que la comunidad OSM obliga tener por normas. Y si lo cumple. Esta persona no logró encontrar la wiki, esta es, le puedes responder en el mismo mensaje ->  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Humanitarian_OSM_Team/Open_Mapping_Hub_-_Latin_America_and_The_Caribbean/Activations/2026_Annual_Regional_Macro-Mapathon
lalgonzales (2026-07-15 07:08:56+00:00): Apologies for the previous comment, I accidentally included some internal text when copying the link.
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-15 06:15:00+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Are the added names real?
ROAD3 (1539175405), v2
AJANTA2 (1539175406), v2
ROAD1 (1539175407), v2
ROAD4 (1539175420), v2
Negreheb (2026-07-15 22:26:14+00:00): Ich würde separate Gehsteige bevorzugen und habe damit auch in Salzburg schon weitläufiger damit angefangen. Vielleicht können wir das einheitlich machen? Das wäre super :)
Negreheb (2026-07-15 22:29:14+00:00): Ah, ich hab jetzt erst gesehen, dass du die eh dann später mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1539187681 wieder hinzugefügt hast. 
Du bist gerade sehr viel am hin- und hereditieren, soweit ich das sehen kann. 
Wenn du mal hilfe benötigst, kannst du gern an einem ersten Dienstag im Monat vorbeischauen im BWS Elisabeth-Vorstadt in der nähe vom Hauptbahnhof. 
Infos sind im Forum unter https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/osm-treffen-salzburg-stammtisch/100985 zu finden :)
Vektor_567 (2026-07-15 22:58:53+00:00): Hallo, ja ich bevorzuge auch separate Gehsteige. Habe das temporär rückgängig gemacht und dann schrittweise auf getrennte Markierung der Gehsteige umgeändert.
Vektor_567 (2026-07-15 23:02:43+00:00): Ich konzentriere mich in der Stadt Salzburg nur auf Gebiete, die ich persönlich kenne. Der Eindruck vom herumeditieren entsteht dadurch, dass ich was neu anlege, und danach schrittweise im Detail verfeinere
jandar22 (2026-07-15 16:00:31+00:00): Hello! Please be advised that when marking roads and cycleways as "under construction" using highway=construction there needs to also be a construction=* value describing what the feature is, i.e. "tertiary" or "cycleway". I have added these in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185792579
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185741460
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-26 15:43:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1431798983/history

Czemu sądzisz że to coś opisane przez https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:place%3Dallotments i https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%253Dallotments ?
matix849 (2026-07-27 20:00:58+00:00): Cześć! Faktycznie szukałem na szybko tagów na oznaczenie altanki działkowej i mnie skierowało do podlinkowanej wiki i uznałem, że jest ok. Zmieniłem przed chwilą w https://www.osm.org/changeset/186480908 na lepsze.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-29 08:24:59+00:00): o, to będzie lepsze :)

jak tam są działki to landuse=allotments może mieć sens (a jak ogródki to leisure=garden)
eggie (2026-07-14 21:22:49+00:00): Hoi,

amenity drinking_water toegevoegd als hoofdtag

MVG
eggie
Fraxi (2026-07-15 12:53:29+00:00): И прокуратурата е в сградата на съдебната палата :P
Dimitar155 (2026-07-15 13:02:21+00:00): Вероятно е така, но имам списък само на съдилищата :)
eggie (2026-07-14 21:20:58+00:00): Dag Oploo.. Wat heeft deze link te maken met de huisartspraktijk?
WEBSITE AANGEPAST NAAR https://www.huisartsenpraktijkoploorijkevoort.nl/
Dikkie Dik (2026-07-15 06:30:48+00:00): In dat pand zit een huisartsenpraktijk. Klopt, die website.

De andere, Van Steenhuijsstraat 35A is de sporthal "D'n Oploop". De kantine/vergaderruimte Excellent zitten in 35B
jandar22 (2026-07-15 15:45:07+00:00): Hello! Please be advised that when marking roads and cycleways as "under construction" using highway=construction there needs to also be a construction=* value describing what the feature is, i.e. "tertiary" or "cycleway". I have added these in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185792579
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185741907
Huong Dang (2026-07-21 16:36:46+00:00): thanks for letting me know!
A67-A67 (2026-07-14 21:10:21+00:00): Zijn deze straten al in aanleg of is alleen nog maar de naam vastgesteld?

Als de straat nog niet in aanleg is, dan is highway=construction incorrect. De correcte tag is dan highway=proposed.
eggie (2026-07-15 08:07:08+00:00): Het is allemaal nog niet aanwezig.
Eén gebouw is inmiddels gesloopt.
Ik heb wat aangepast.
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.19167,4.462906,17/?datastrip=20260628_SVNEO-01&sensorname=SuperView-NEO

MVG
eggie
feket (2026-07-15 08:41:28+00:00): Did you check? Don’t delete a POI just because it looks like something that’s in a different place!
infeeeee (2026-07-28 21:06:24+00:00): Reverted. There are 2 places with a similar name in Budapest. Not an unheard of situation...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186544280
birimkulova (2026-07-23 10:32:18+00:00): Thanks for your comment
caprieldeluca (2026-07-15 01:23:53+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa!
Revisé el changeset y me parece correcto.
Por cualquier consulta podés contactarte con la comunidad OpenStreetMap Argentina: osm.wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto
eggie (2026-07-14 21:17:16+00:00): DD,

Probeer als het kan op de bestaande adresnodes bij te taggen. organic is geen ideale editor daarvoor,
MVG
eggie
AskManav (2026-07-16 06:38:24+00:00): The Pune to Pratapgad Traverse was updated/modified.

1. Since this ridgeline is a upranga (marathi for ridge that runs perpendicular to the main North South Sahyadri Spine) it is nice to use one ridgeline to hike East and then use a different ridgeline to hike West. This creates a nice loop with more trails for hikers to explore. A long ridgeline was added in this region starting from Pabe Khind till Nasrapur. This ridgeline runs parallel to K2S and just South of it.

2. Along the popular ridgeline of Katraj - Sinhagad - Rajgad - Torna more trails were added to reduce the road sections, incorporate more ghatvaats like Singapur Naal. There are still few road sections that need to be replaced by trails. But the overall region is well lit now in terms of trail network.

This traverse has been updated and more routes are added to the region.
AskManav (2026-07-16 06:49:49+00:00): Sudhagad to Raigad route has been updated/modified.

1. The big road section from Taila Baila village to Ghutke village has been replaced by a dense forest trail west of Mahar Thana peak. The region is also further connected North towards Kalamb village through a trail.

2. Telyachinaal – Thipthipyaghat routes are in ruins as locals have stopped using these trails. I walked through both these routes and a better alternative is the Waghzai Khind trail which is regularly used by lcoals and is in good condition.

3. Tamhini to Dhamanohol is again a nice trail connection reducing trail connection drsatically. 

There are still a couple of ghatvaats near Sudhagad that need to be mapped for a better connection towards Taila Baila as Savasni Ghat is not in good condition.
Negreheb (2026-07-14 21:32:18+00:00): Servus, danke fürs hinzufügen!
Bitte bei den Tesla Superchargern nicht das in den "name=*"-Tag reinpacken :) 
Und - gerade die Tesla-Charger sind freistehend und nicht an der Wand montiert - d.h. die Punkte sollten nicht auf der Mauer drauf liegen.
Beim car-port ist der layer=1 auch nicht notwendig. 

Änderst du das noch, oder soll ich mal ran?
manchmalfindicheinenfehler (2026-07-15 06:31:29+00:00): Hallo, danke für die freundliche Rückmeldung! Bitte gerne du machen, du scheinst hier mehr Wissen zu haben. Ich schau mir das im Nachgang gerne an und lerne so dazu.
Negreheb (2026-07-28 09:07:11+00:00): So, lang genug hats gedauert, aber ist geändert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186506476 :) 
name=* weg (ich hab gesehen, dass iD das selbst vorschlägt, finde ich etwas eigenartig), von der Wand gelöst und das Carport auch angepasst.
RJ-Gouda (2026-07-14 21:35:24+00:00): I forgot to update the description when editing- Should be '3Dshapes & groen bijgeerkt'
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-15 16:19:41+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185794893
flohoff (2026-07-15 09:37:27+00:00): Nur weil du hier anfängst wild landuses fix an flurstücke anzubinden.

Das hat jemand in Bielefeld gemacht und wir haben 10 Jahre gebraucht das wieder aufzuräumen. Das ist unsinn.

Landuse ist keine repräsentation von Flurstücken. Es ist eine NUTZUNG - Und wir sind auch keine kopie des ALKIS.

Es gibt für Flurstücke boundary cadastre - Der konsens in Deutschland ist aber das nicht zu mappen.

Dir Flurstücksgrenzen können eine indikation sein wo landuses/dinge zu ende sind. Aber es ist kein hartes Faktum. Und hier an der Stelle ist das völliger unsinn.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8242613839
flohoff (2026-07-15 09:38:14+00:00): Hier habe ich das schon wieder korrigiert. 

Es gibt für die abgeschnittene Ecke die du da gemapped hast KEINERLEI fakten vor ort - Siehe Mapillary.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3587809774
jandar22 (2026-07-15 15:54:32+00:00): Reverted this addition of a ford since the waterway is culverted under the road and pathway, verifiable by Bing Streetside. Please only use ford=yes when water crosses over top of the way, and check the documentation if uncertain.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185743222
eggie (2026-07-15 04:36:36+00:00): Hoi.. Graag oo dr bestaande adresnodes bij taggen. De plaatsnaam ontbreekt.
Mvg,
Eggie
eggie (2026-07-15 07:47:38+00:00): nr 24 is het pand er naast en daar dit een schoenmaker?
eggie (2026-07-15 08:00:05+00:00): Ik heb wat aangepast en gecombineerd met de adresnodes.
TheVolter (2026-07-15 09:13:21+00:00): Hoi @eggie sorry ik had dit aangemaakt via CoMaps (eerste keer dat ik dit zo doe).
Ik weet dat deze winkel hier is. Het adres is ook Oudestraat 24. Aleen nummer 24 bestond nog niet op de kaart als adresnode toen ik hem aanmaakte.
Ook waren de andere adresnodes verkeerd, omdat de schoenmaker op de Oudestraat 16 zit wat er niet naast zit. Hier zitten ook nog wat winkels tussenin die ik later kan toevoegen.
eggie (2026-07-15 09:22:25+00:00): Oke... kun jij dan die winkels met adres opnieuw verschuiven? Ze zijn nu wel gecombineerd met de juiste adresnode.
Evt zou je die adressen nog kunnen checken in de BAG viewer. Als ze dan nog niet kloppen zou er een terugmelding naar het kadaster kunnen doen via de BAG viewer.

Groet eggie
TheVolter (2026-07-15 09:34:07+00:00): Zoals het er nu uit ziet op de map staan de addressen wel goed. Alleen zie ik de schoenmaker niet, zal ik die dan toevoegen op nummer 16?
eggie (2026-07-15 10:00:05+00:00): Die had ik toegevoegd waar de BAG nr 16 laat zien.
Even ctrl f5 een paar keer.
Nr 24 was er ook gewoon, maar daar stond al een winkel op. Maar de website deed niets meer dus die adresnode had ik leeggemaakt.
Ik zal even de BAG openen en je een link sturen
Dat CoMaps is een kleine ramp voor de kaart. Je kunt geen adressen selecteren
eggie (2026-07-15 10:01:28+00:00): https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=oudestraat+16+assen&objectId=0106200000037924&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=233916.5043584092&geometry.y=557221.502958994&zoomlevel=14.952106047713933
Zoals het Kadaster het nu ziet.
eggie (2026-07-15 10:03:52+00:00): En daar zit 16 toch echt waar ik de schoenwinkel heb gezet.
Dat pand met die schuine achterkant heeft nr 14 en 16
Als dat niet klopt kun je een foutmelding sturen naar het Kadaster via bovenstaande site.
TheVolter (2026-07-15 10:09:58+00:00): Ik zal maar geen CoMaps meer gebruiken om winkels aan addressen toe te voegen, omdat je dus dat adres niet kan selecteren.

Volgens mij staat het adres qua gebouw nu ook goed.

Bedankt voor de hulp en sorry dat ik het er zo in had gezet.
eggie (2026-07-15 10:13:09+00:00): No problem. 😀
AskManav (2026-07-15 18:50:46+00:00): The Mahabaleshwar Traverse Hiking Route has been updated/modified.

1. Kudali Khurd to Nakhinda - this route is not in use and therefore an alternate inclusive hiking route from Gudhe - Nivangan - Dhanivali is hiked and mapped.
2. The Mahabaleshwar Traverse route had a long road section East of Jambhali Dam that has been updated by a route called Nishnichi Vaat reducing road section drastically.
3. Multiple trails are added North of Raireshwar, South of Koleshwar and North and South of Mahabaleshwar
4. The Kopeshwar to Kamalgad regional route is no more in use as the old couple who used to live on top of Koleshwar has left in 2026. The trail is completely shut.
5. Old Mahabaleshwar to Arthur Seat trail is not in good condition. It is good in few patches and bad in remaining. 

Since more trails got mapped in the community hikes done in between 2021 - 2025 all three plateaus - Raireshwar, Koleshwar and Mahabaleshwar have a lot of trails. These are therefore made part of Stage 35, 36, 37 of the Epic Sahyadri trail and the Mahabaleshwar Traverse was modified to stitch trails in a way that will reduce road sections and have more trails to hike.

There is still a lot of trails that can be mapped South East of Mahabaleshwar.
AskManav (2026-07-16 06:29:52+00:00): The Pune to Pratapgad Traverse was updated/modified.

1. Since this ridgeline is a upranga (marathi for ridge that runs perpendicular to the main North South Sahyadri Spine) it is nice to use one ridgeline to hike East and then use a different ridgeline to hike West. This creates a nice loop with more trails for hikers to explore. A long ridgeline was added in this region starting from Pabe Khind till Nasrapur. This ridgeline runs parallel to K2S and just South of it.

2. Along the popular ridgeline of Katraj - Sinhagad - Rajgad - Torna more trails were added to reduce the road sections, incorporate more ghatvaats like Singapur Naal. There are still few road sections that need to be replaced by trails. But the overall region is well lit now in terms of trail network.

Trails to forts like Kangorigad are completely gone from Gothivali side. A lot of road contruction took place breaking the trail continuity between Mohangad and Pratapgad. Aswal Khind is the only wilderness pass left.

After incorporating all the above mentioned changes, Pune to Pratapgad traverse has been updated and after adding more routes it has become Stage 31 of the Epic Sahyadri Trail.
StreetSurveyor (2026-07-15 23:12:04+00:00): This edit is incorrect. foot=* and bicycle=* tags describe legal access restrictions, not whether sidewalks or bike lanes are mapped separately. Unless there’s a legal prohibition those tags shouldn’t be added to the roadway.
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-15 06:14:20+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the added name real?
Rich people mansion (1457561160), v2
AskManav (2026-07-15 18:34:48+00:00): The trail between Karjat to Jumma Patti is now a road. It was sad to see the red ribbons which were old trail markers that now stand on a wide road. 

The routes Matheran 1 and 2 were updated/modified. Now all the trails (all those trails that are regularly used by locals and thus are in good condition) are made part of one Stage 24 of the Epic Sahyadri Trail. This stage lets you experience the trails all around Matheran reducing road hiking drastically.

The Peb/Vikatgad route was also updated because when I did the route in 2026 the whole trail was in very bad condition (thickets, landslide points). It is better not to keep it part of any hiking route.

Two trails Myra Point to Katwan and Beatrice Cliff to Katwan were hiked in 2026 and I decided not to add them as the condition of these trails is extremely bad. These trails are full of trash. Other routes like Koltyachi naal, Dugad naal are all not in use. 

The Prabalgad to irshalgad route got an update where this traverse is now further extended towards Nimda Dongar.
AskManav (2026-07-15 18:18:38+00:00): Raigad to Nasrapur superroute is updated because the trail Kadve Khind to Pol does not exist anymore (raod construction North of Kadve Khind and no trail on the ridgeline till Gawli Khind)
AskManav (2026-07-15 18:24:00+00:00): This route (Kadve Khind to Pol) was verified in Jan - Feb 2026 when I did the Epic Sahyadri Trail. Unfortunately, a very nice ridgeline trail lost. :(
AskManav (2026-07-15 18:09:50+00:00): Changed the route from National to Regional. Too small to be national.
Aeuri (2026-07-17 15:10:06+00:00): It seems you failed to check that this area is currently under construction, not just proposed. Grading for the new roadway is currently underway, and the old roadway has been razed. Because of that, I am going to revert it to how it was before. 

https://www.santafecountynm.gov/news/detail/avenida-del-sur-road-extension-updates-and-road-closure
TheNightRider (2026-07-18 09:37:46+00:00): Thanks, this evidence is exactly what is required. I actually did check all aerial imagery I could find, but did not start doing a web search because supplying a link to the evidence in the changeset source is the responsibility of whoever is making the change. You have severed the Avenida del Sur/A Van Nu Po bus route again (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12332296). Are you going to fix that or leave it for others to fix again?
Aeuri (2026-07-18 18:42:57+00:00): Please remember that deletion of elements is not best practice, first steps toward rectifying issues should involve re-tagging or communication with the contributor or local community. Information gathered by the local community in-person or otherwise by knowledge of their community will usually be more up-to-date than aerial imagery.

I am completely willing to repair the bus route relation, but held off from doing so due to lack of information on current conditions with the road closure (i.e. is it diverted, suspended, etc.) Advise if inclined.
alpacaMaps (2026-07-15 01:10:50+00:00): This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.

If these cameras are real, please let us know so the map stays accurate. Otherwise, we'd kindly ask that you avoid adding cameras that aren't actually there, and that you remove any temporary or test nodes once you're done.

If this was simply a mistake, no problem at all — just clean up the nodes that don't correspond to a real-world camera, and leave a quick note here so we can help.

Thanks for helping keep OpenStreetMap accurate.

— alpacaMaps
alpacaMaps (2026-07-15 01:43:35+00:00): This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.

If these cameras are real, please let us know so the map stays accurate. Otherwise, we'd kindly ask that you avoid adding cameras that aren't actually there, and that you remove any temporary or test nodes once you're done.

If this was simply a mistake, no problem at all — just clean up the nodes that don't correspond to a real-world camera, and leave a quick note here so we can help.

Thanks for helping keep OpenStreetMap accurate.

— alpacaMaps
user_5359 (2026-07-15 09:22:45+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1539198265. What is the mean of the tag?
felipeeugenio (2026-07-15 12:43:58+00:00): corrected. Thanks
iandees (2026-07-14 23:03:18+00:00): Hello! Please note that OSM prefers to keep street addresses expanded rather than using contractions. It's easier for a computer to convert "Avenue" to "Ave" than the other way around. I've update the two cases in your neighborhood here. Thanks for making OSM better.
letaazul (2026-07-14 22:39:18+00:00): I surveyed the ways here with GPS so I'm fairly certain about the ground truth, but since I'm a new mapper and this is my first time dealing with a roundabout and relations I'd appreciate if someone could double-check whether I've made a glaring mistake somewhere. (Feel free to revert if so.)
eggie (2026-07-15 04:31:52+00:00): Dag tyssert,
Probeer als het kan op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen.
In je adres ontbreekt de plaatsnaam.
Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-07-15 08:01:56+00:00): Info verplaatst naar de adresnode. 
Organic is geen ideale app voor adressen.
MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2026-07-15 09:42:46+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2thE. What is the mean of the tag verif = modify?
PierZen (2026-07-15 13:31:19+00:00): Merci, j'ai corrigé. J'utilise cet attribut temporairement lors de l'édition et ai oublié d'enlever avant d'envoyer les données.
joost schouppe (2026-07-22 14:52:18+00:00): I think retaining wall is closer to what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366597347 is than dam
Romi Gerne (2026-07-30 11:21:26+00:00): According Wiki, dam is closer to retaining wall. The structure is holding water, not soil. I've seen many cases on the map where the dam tag is used not only to hold back the original flow, but also in the surrounding area. www.openstreetmap.org/way/943923615
MassCartog (2026-07-15 12:49:50+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. I see that you removed what looks like a home/farm on West 900 North, could you give more detail why you removed these features? Were they demolished?
Wildsharky (2026-07-17 06:09:41+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185884626
Loopslol7 (2026-07-15 02:05:56+00:00): Hello! 

Please dont forget to add changeset comments! it helps other mappers to understand what you are doing on the map.

I also use go map, and i understand it can be easy to just submit the edit without the comment, but it is very useful for other mappers.

Thank you for helping with the map!
Deathtouch6293 (2026-07-15 03:42:57+00:00): Shoot I’m sorry about that! I forgot to add that! I’ll make sure to next time.
Loopslol7 (2026-07-15 03:58:59+00:00): Its ok, thank you for understanding! Happy mapping :)
Till_btn (2026-07-18 09:50:37+00:00): Hallo,
bitte schau dir doch mal den Wiki-Artikel zu "name=*" an und überarbeite deine Änderungen der letzten Tage entsprechend: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name

In das Feld gehört nur der Hauptname, der vor Ort zu finden ist. Keine Zusätze wie der jeweilige Ort (ist aus der Position klar) oder der Firmenname (dafür gibt es "operator=*") oder Beschreibungen, die schon durch andere Tags abgebildet werden (" Informationstafel (Wegweiser)")

Viele Grüße
Till
flohoff (2026-07-15 06:05:52+00:00): Das kann übrigens kein Track sein - Tracks sind überwiegend oder ausschliesslich Landwirtschaftliche Nutzung. Da ist keine Landwirtschaft - Das ist ja ein Industriegebiet:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1539237692/

Das sind im übrigen nur die Rückgebauten reste des Nottebrockswegs - da ist auch nichts proposed - Das ist rückgebaut. Das ist noch für den Abriss der Parsevalsiedlung als Baustraße verwendet worden und dann mit abgerissen.

Den ursprünglichen zustand kann man sich bei Mapillary ansehen.

Flo
user_5359 (2026-07-17 06:11:16+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14016118867. Is this really a inscription or more a description? 

Have you translated the inscription, or are all three languages on the object? In the first case, you can use the language code ‘Postfix’; in the second case, they should be included in the ‘inscription’ key in the order in which they appear. The spelling ‘Inscription’ is incorrect.