piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-03-02 23:03:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13613146007 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Office building"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Bürogebäude"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-11 05:33:28+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179673365
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-03-02 23:06:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13613153518 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tool rental store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-11 05:33:28+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179277804
felipeeugenio (2026-03-03 19:25:22+00:00): Hola. el nombre estaba malo, o lo cambiaron?
gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179277776
ajmat (2026-03-03 12:58:42+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179300939
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
NeisBot (2026-03-02 23:24:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13613159033 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "IT Support Office"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "IT-Support-Büro"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
MappingMore (2026-03-03 12:31:26+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179299768
Dillen GJ (2026-03-04 19:33:20+00:00): Volgens mij niet, kledingwinkel is nu een Normal winkel geworden maar adres staat er dubbel in dus ik verwijder de kledingwinkel.
Info van Normal winkel: Alkmaar, Langestraat
Langestraat 60
1811 JJ Alkmaar

+31 6 22 11 29 41 
NL0143@normal.nl
McCarte (2026-05-08 06:58:15+00:00): Why have you changed the entirety of the metro tunnel level/layer to -4 without considering the impact of these edits? The levels at each station are: -2 at Anzac, -4 Town Hall, -3 State Library, -2 Parkville & -2 Arden. The track levels need to match these levels for the DTP maps and journey planning to work.
felipeeugenio (2026-03-03 19:16:47+00:00): Hola Andrés.
¿Por cuanto van a estar cerradas? si es un tiempo de unas semanas no vale mucho la pena dibujar algo. En todo caso, si una calle es solo para residentes, con access=destination basta.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179278556
ntzm (2026-03-03 14:48:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your contribution. If you'd like to connect with the OSM Sheffield community please feel free to join us at https://matrix.to/#/#osm-sheffield:matrix.org
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
MappingMore (2026-03-04 12:44:42+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179347778
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
arcanma (2026-03-03 08:51:04+00:00): Benvenuto in OpenStreetMap;
ho modificato il tuo inserimento perché dalle informazioni che ho trovato DrinkTower non è il nome dell'edificio ma di un centro ricreativo (o qualcosa del genere) presente nell'edificio, per cui ho inserito un nodo con il nome, il tipo di attività e l'indirizzo.
Per il tipo di attività ho messo club=social ("A club is an association of two or more people united by a common interest or goal"), per una descrizione specifica anche il tipo di club vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:club, se non va bene la tipologia puoi metterne una che si adatta meglio o se è un'attività diversa puoi vedere anche la sezione "See also"
DrinkTower (2026-03-03 14:40:26+00:00): Ciao, grazie mille!
Le modifiche sono perfette, io comunque stavo cercando di aggiungere la mia attività sulla mappa di facebook, hai mica idea di come si faccia?
arcanma (2026-03-03 17:02:36+00:00): Ciao, credo che FB utilizzi la mappa di base (strade, edifici e altri elementi) senza le attività presenti, ma non sono sicuro. Ho visto che c'è un gruppo Openstreetmap su FB (https://www.facebook.com/groups/2233301645/), puoi chiedere lì
ajmat (2026-03-04 18:16:38+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 179362087
nevw (2026-03-03 02:32:11+00:00): Hi, does the Twelve Apostles Trail relalation need updating too?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11142281
DavidM3260 (2026-03-03 02:36:50+00:00): I'm not sure. I'm new here. Some people still use the Twelve Apostles Trail name colloquially, but the officially gazetted name (which is also used in marketing materials and on the road signs) is Poorpa Yanyeen Meerreeng
nevw (2026-03-03 02:48:18+00:00): Both the Twelve Apostles Trail relalation and Poorpa Yanyeen Meerreeng trail may benefit from the addition of some of the name variants listed on our Wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
Brummelwuff (2026-03-09 12:25:31+00:00): Moin du hast mit der Änderung die Routen osm.org/relation/3284793 und osm.org/relation/13723995 unterbrochen.
Imran_Sarker (2026-03-03 01:47:45+00:00): This is fee land, which is just private property owned by a tribe or tribal member. Only reservations or trust land should count as aboriginal land.
Natfoot (2026-03-04 08:46:27+00:00): you might want to add this comment to a note=* within the polygon.
KennyDap (2026-03-03 05:46:48+00:00): Politically motivated vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179284313
ljc_jlyb (2026-03-03 02:31:32+00:00): 修正：乐东乡镇
ajmat (2026-03-05 05:54:13+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 179379347
infeeeee (2026-04-17 20:03:10+00:00): Szia!

Óvatosan a ChatGPT használatával térképezéshez, sok butaságot is adhat, mindig ellenőrizd le nem-e hallucinált valamit. Illetve kérdéses, hogy mennyire kompatibilis a rajta keresztül kinyert adat az ODbL licensszel... 

Onnan tudom, hogy ezt használtad, hogy benne hagytad a linkek végén, a referenciáját: utm_source=chatgpt.com

Javítottam.
muralito (2026-03-05 22:23:53+00:00): Hola. ¿Que fuente estas usando para estos cambios?
DaveF (2026-03-03 13:11:18+00:00): Shouldn't delete name, fhrs or website. Prefix with disabled:*. They're useful for validation checks & future amendments..
LordGarySugar (2026-03-03 20:13:10+00:00): Could do, but it's not really standard practice to keep lifecycle prefixed website and fhrs tags. They're still in the history if anyone needed to check the website for a closed pub. I find people often forget to delete old tags when pois rebrand, so it keeps them clean for whatever appears next.
ajmat (2026-03-04 06:19:30+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179333351
Baloo Uriza (2026-03-04 23:49:01+00:00): I'll need some Mapillary or Panoramax imagery from the ground to really get this right.  From above it still looks like a dedicated two-lane cycleway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179281889
Yhor (2026-03-05 00:22:18+00:00): When you go up to it on a bicycle, it looks like a multiuse path, separated bike path. I spoke to some of the people associated with the two facilities though, asking why it's always locked. They explained it's not a public path, but a shuttle trail for parking lot shuttle.
Baloo Uriza (2026-03-05 14:40:29+00:00): OK, well, with the absence of signage, I think it's mapped right for now, though isn't it public access at both ends by virtue of being a public park and a city cycleway at the other end?  Might be something to bring up with your city councilor.
Yhor (2026-03-05 14:56:08+00:00): It's not a city cycleway at either end. It connects a casino/racetrack on one end to a pay to enter softball complex on the other end. It's gated, with a lock and 2 meter/6' fence to prevent access when there are no events happening. When there are events, there's security limiting public access. It's Chicasaw casino property, not Oklahoma City, except where it's in the easement, which is a very short distance.
Baloo Uriza (2026-03-05 15:06:38+00:00): So public property with differing jurisidictions at either end.  At a minimum, pointing out that it could be signed better at the intersection to clarify access before committing to it would probably be smart.
Yhor (2026-03-05 15:12:59+00:00): Oklahoma City recently put a bike lane moratorium in place at city council. In January or February. I don't think they really care about my request for something that they only have partial control over.
Baloo Uriza (2026-03-05 15:16:57+00:00): Wow.  We really live in a backwards craphole, don't we?
Yhor (2026-03-05 15:40:49+00:00): Agreed!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 07:19:20+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags and a likely source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184212105

https://osm.org/changeset/184212105
無限の刃 (2026-03-04 03:21:32+00:00): 各々が、キーとタグを独自の方法で使用すると、データ利用者にはそれが何であるか分かりにくくなります。そこで、一定の形式が必要となり、各キー・各タグの形式が OpenStreetMap Wiki にまとめられ、標準となります。 OpenStreetMap は国際的な地図であり、海外でも同一キー・同一タグが使用されます。

以下に、その各形式について説明いたします。
（つまり、以下の説明は OpenStreetMap Wiki での記述に基づいており私独自の編集方法ではなく、私への論破は不可能です。）


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Names

キー「int_name」
「国際名（注: 代わりに特定の言語での名前（name:en=...）の使用を検討してください。国際名は（必ずしも）英語を意味するわけではありません。これはベラルーシ、ブルガリア、ギリシャ、カザフスタン、北マケドニアでラテン文字に翻字する際に利用されていました。 」
この状況でキー「int_name」が翻字ではなく、標識などの現地で確認できる外国人用名称として使用されてしまうと、上述の問題（各々が、キーとタグを独自の方法で使用すると、データ利用者にはそれが何であるか分かりにくくなります。）が発生します。

キー「name:<xx> 」
「異なる言語での名前。」
良いやり方
「OSMではon the ground principleに従っており、一般的に通りの名前などの固有名詞は、それが通常の綴り規則から逸脱していても、標識にある通りに入力します。ただ以下の節には例外が記述されているかもしれません。 」
「If the name isn't present on any signs, follow the local spelling rules.」
つまり、固有名詞に普通名詞の略称が含まれる場合は、それを入力しなければなりません。

英語名称がその場で確認できる場合は、「name:en:signed=yes」を使用して、そのことをタグで明示できます。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:*:signed


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E5%A4%9A%E5%9B%BD%E8%AA%9E%E3%81%AE%E5%90%8D%E7%A7%B0#%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC_(Japan)

キー「name:en=*」は「英語名称または日本語ローマ字表記」です。


「JapanTaggingの合意」もありません。



また、 キー「int_name」のあなたの考案した使用法について、DWG が認めた使用法であると仰りましたが、そうではありません。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19857
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19864
hayashi (2026-03-07 01:15:17+00:00): あなたの主張は、OSM Wiki に記載されている 「国際名（注：代わりに特定の言語での名前（name:en=…）の使用を検討してください。国際名は必ずしも英語を意味するわけではありません。これはベラルーシ、ブルガリア、ギリシャ、カザフスタン、北マケドニアでラテン文字に翻字する際に利用されていました。」  
という注意書きのみを根拠に、独自の解釈を展開しているように見受けられます。しかし、日本に関する記述については一切考慮されていません。

あなたの解釈は、OSM Wiki の以下の記述と矛盾しています。

- [osmwiki/JA:名称](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E5%90%8D%E7%A7%B0) 
- [JA:Japan_tagging](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Japan_tagging)

日本の地物に関するタグ付け規約は、日本のコミュニティで議論を重ねたうえで合意形成され、その結果が OSM Wiki に反映されています。

[JA:Japan_tagging](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Japan_tagging)

OSM Wiki の一部だけを都合よく引用するのではなく、OSM Wiki 全体を丁寧に読み、関連項目を総合的に理解する必要があります。

とはいえ、OSM Wiki の記述は複数ページに分散しており、調べるのが大変であることも理解しています。  
そこで、OSM wikiの内容をまとめた解説ページを作成しましたので、参考にしてください。

- [多言語表記のタグ付けを考える](https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/hayashi/diary/408246)

なお、この「多言語表記のタグ付けを考える」は、2026年2月1日に さくらインターネット Blooming Camp で開催された、[マッパーズサミット2026](https://osm.connpass.com/event/380259/)」にて発表した内容です。  
念のため会場でも「int_name の用法」について反対意見がないか確認しましたが、異議を唱えた参加者は一人もいませんでした。

なお、この解説に対して反論がある場合、[JA:Japan_tagging](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Japan_tagging)に記載されているとおり、[OpenStreetMap Japan メーリングリスト](https://lists.openstreetmap.org/mailman/listinfo/talk-ja)等で意見交換すること」が推奨されています。

ちなみに、このチェンジセットであなたが行った「int_name」を「name:en」に置き換えることは、OSMwikiの以下の項目に違反します。

- 「現地語名称は言語明示サブキーと重複させてください 」@[wiki/JA:多国語の名称#言語明示タグによる複数回の名前付け](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E5%A4%9A%E5%9B%BD%E8%AA%9E%E3%81%AE%E5%90%8D%E7%A7%B0#%E8%A8%80%E8%AA%9E%E6%98%8E%E7%A4%BA%E3%82%BF%E3%82%B0%E3%81%AB%E3%82%88%E3%82%8B%E8%A4%87%E6%95%B0%E5%9B%9E%E3%81%AE%E5%90%8D%E5%89%8D%E4%BB%98%E3%81%91)
- 「略称は使用しないでください」@[wiki/JA:名称#略称](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E5%90%8D%E7%A7%B0#%E7%95%A5%E7%A7%B0%EF%BC%88%E4%BD%BF%E7%94%A8%E3%81%97%E3%81%AA%E3%81%84%E3%81%A7%E3%81%8F%E3%81%A0%E3%81%95%E3%81%84%EF%BC%89)
- 「省略しない」@[wiki/JA:名称#略称](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E5%90%8D%E7%A7%B0#%E7%95%A5%E7%A7%B0%EF%BC%88%E4%BD%BF%E7%94%A8%E3%81%97%E3%81%AA%E3%81%84%E3%81%A7%E3%81%8F%E3%81%A0%E3%81%95%E3%81%84%EF%BC%89)
- 「一般的な名称以外は、派生名に入れてください」@[osmwiki:名称キー](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E5%90%8D%E7%A7%B0#%E5%90%8D%E7%A7%B0%E3%82%AD%E3%83%BC)
- 「name:enの英語には -chome を付ける」[Japan_tagging#地名の入力規則](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Japan_tagging)

今後は、int_name タグを削除したり、name:en に置き換えたりする前に、
OpenStreetMap Japan メーリングリスト（talk-ja）等で意見交換し、Japan_tagging に基づく合意を得てから作業を行ってください。
gc27 (2026-03-12 10:16:43+00:00): > 会場でも「int_name の用法」について反対意見がないか確認しましたが、異議を唱えた参加者は一人もいませんでした
Discordコミュニティメンバであり、上記「会場」で登壇されたhayashiさんの主張に同意します

ただ、お二人で編集合戦になっていることも事実として懸念しています
kucai (2026-07-14 09:51:34+00:00): deme split balik ke jalan ni? aku dah combinekan hari tu sebab tak ada divider kat sini.
GrabMY_FaizDjamil (2026-07-15 02:10:29+00:00): sebab jarak antara divider tu tak jauh dan situ double solid line. Sebelum ni ada org letak simpang boleh masuk ke LRT ampang. tu saya split terus
kucai (2026-07-15 15:53:32+00:00): kemon.. kalau ada simpang kita boleh buat macam2. tak silap aku taruk no passing kat line tengah2 tu masa sambung balik dulu untuk pastikan function sama macam split hiway. tapi entah le, belasah je kot. lepas ni kena standardizekan pulak berapa jarak minimum. kalau jalan residential/unclassified tu boleh faham gak la yg jenis ada pulau2 divider pendek2, tapi bila kita nak buat yg hiway besar/utama ni elok kita selaraskan.
kucai (2026-07-19 06:10:16+00:00): Yang ni jumpa dlm r/openstreetmap:

"... because roads should be mapped according to physical barriers. If OSM were used by an ambulance or fire truck, it should be able to tell them to turn at the last possible moment, even if it means crossing a solid white line. Only the physical barrier of the curb should affect where roads are mapped, not paint. "
synthfi (2026-03-03 04:33:46+00:00): for some reason iD kept forcing me to put the roads after the platforms. unsure why, will investigate later
Natfoot (2026-03-09 05:53:33+00:00): this is great news and there was no need to delete it. you also did not add the bridge tag back to the new line you put in. so the trail is not on a bridge.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179283053
alpacaMaps (2026-07-28 01:07:57+00:00): This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.

If these cameras are real, please let us know so the map stays accurate. Otherwise, we'd kindly ask that you avoid adding cameras that aren't actually there, and that you remove any temporary or test nodes once you're done.

If this was simply a mistake, no problem at all — just clean up the nodes that don't correspond to a real-world camera, and leave a quick note here so we can help.

Thanks for helping keep OpenStreetMap accurate.

— alpacaMaps
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-11 01:10:36+00:00): "Phone" and "Website" should be lowercase; phone and opening_hours have invalid formats, and the unit number ("#7) should be under `addr_unit` (instead of whatever is under there now). Fixed in several followup changesets.
fortera_au (2026-03-03 23:17:51+00:00): Hi, there appears to be barriers going across sections of roadways you've drawn, it might be best to confirm with street level imagery or with better quality aerial imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179284064
B Sai Deepthi (2026-03-05 10:17:01+00:00): Apologies for the mistake. I have reverted the edit. Thank you for your valuable feedback. I will be more careful when editing the existing data in the future.
Thank You,
B Sai Deepthi
Solaris07 (2026-06-16 01:21:36+00:00): Hey, just wondering what your reasoning behind some of these road classification changes are? 
Thanks
ika-chan! (2026-03-03 09:32:40+00:00): Hello: In Greece, the name in Greek goes under name=*, and the Latin name goes under int_name=* or name:en=*.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179284185
MappingMore (2026-03-03 12:06:13+00:00): Revert of 179250008
Wildsharky (2026-03-05 06:30:25+00:00): Revert of 179280916
Flo ERH (2026-03-03 05:54:54+00:00): lokales Wissen, vor Ort, gerade vergessen
weblogdryads (2026-05-09 03:25:11+00:00): road not correctly mapped.
B Sai Deepthi (2026-05-11 11:15:27+00:00): I apologize for the mistake I made, and I sincerely appreciate your valuable feedback. Based on the internal GPS evidence I had created the parking road earlier, I will take the necessary corrective measures and revert the edits. I also look forward to your suggestions and feedback in the future. 
Thank you.
B Sai Deepthi
Fan map 2 (2026-07-10 16:15:01+00:00): Cześć,

Dokonano tutaj zmiany nazwy samej drogi bez jednoczesnej zmiany nazwy ulicy w adresach budynków przypisanych do tejże ulicy (pole "addr:street" w obiektach takich jak https://osm.org/way/286494394).

Uzupełniłem te różnice.

Starajmy się pilnować takich spraw na przyszłość aby zachować spójność danych.

Dziękuję
MappingMore (2026-03-05 02:20:44+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179375609
MappingMore (2026-03-05 02:20:34+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179375609
NeisBot (2026-03-03 06:57:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13613726886 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Print shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-11 17:33:02+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/179329910
gscholz (2026-03-14 06:04:52+00:00): Hi  Giovanni ,
this changeset has damaged the boundary relation of "Matese":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=14.42437&lat=41.39837&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14434408/history#map=11/41.4263/14.3919

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
NeisBot (2026-03-03 07:24:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13613780649 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Schrankladen"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und faktischere Version deines Textes lauten: "Schrankladen"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-11 17:33:03+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179288182
mcliquid (2026-03-03 19:04:59+00:00): Vielen Dank!
NeisBot (2026-03-03 07:45:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13613801302 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Electronics factory"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Elektronikfabrik"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
Schaerderbaer (2026-03-03 08:07:28+00:00): Thank you for the useful hint. I removed the description to keep the node neutral.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-03 08:09:57+00:00): Sehr gut, vielen Dank!
Sanniu (2026-03-04 07:46:17+00:00): Hi, something is wrong around https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13613763264, streets are not connected now and parts are missing after your change, can you re-check?
ofirvedalit (2026-03-04 09:15:02+00:00): No Street is connecting HaNuriyyot Street to HaHoresh Street
Sanniu (2026-03-04 10:38:52+00:00): ok, I've connected the points that you left unconnected, maintaining absence of connection between these streets.
qstep (2026-03-03 09:45:07+00:00): Üdv az OpenStreetMap-en! Ezt személyes bejárás alapján vetted fel, ahogy a changesetben jelezted, vagy a turistautak.hu-ról emelted át, ahogy a ponton jelezted? Mert utóbbi lehet, hogy elavult információ.

További jó térképezést!
Bitó Attila (2026-03-03 09:49:08+00:00): Személyes. Minden nap hazafelé jövet ott itatom meg a kutyát. Teljesen jól működő kút. Nagyon rég óta megvan.