piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MichS (2023-09-24 06:48:16+00:00): Glaub ich dir.  Lokale Infos wie hier Weinlagen sind leider nicht für die Darstellung auf der Slippy Map (mapnik) gedacht, sondern geografische, offizielle. Lokale Objekte sollten eine gewisse Bekanntheit haben, werden nicht gerendert sind jedoch über die Suche auffindbar, weil in der Datenbank gespeichert, und sollten beschrieben werden.
timstreetmap (2023-09-24 08:08:46+00:00): Kannst Du das mit einem batch in das Datenfeld « note » teleportieren ?
Goffredo (2023-09-19 07:10:18+00:00): Ciao FoldAE, se permetti appunto su questo changeset:
- sono state separate le corsie ciclabili e pedonali lungo Via Trento, ma non mi pare il caso. La separazione delle corsie tramite due linee andrebbe disegnata solo se c'è davvero una separazione difficilmente valicabile (siepe, muretto, guard rail). C'era già il tag segregated=yes ad indicare che le corsie per bici e pedoni erano separate.

Ciao e buon mapping
user_5359 (2023-09-19 16:15:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/11200466482. What is the mean of the tag
coordenates = 68.33795° N, 18.75077° E
Please notice: Every node has coordinates as part of the object node. We didn't additional keys. 
What is the mean of the key name (a name of an object without a description of the object is useless!)?
Fjellrev (2023-09-24 17:01:24+00:00): Looking at the different points it seems to me that they are just personal markers without any relevant information for the map.
At those places I know from my own visits in the area there is really nothing worth mapping.
So I propose to do a revert if we do not get an answer during the next days.
Sandal man (2023-10-06 12:59:46+00:00): Hello, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1208851385#map=19/39.76509/2.65481
Is this a wall maybe?
Regards Jan
dudone (2023-10-10 18:48:58+00:00): Yes. I have added the tag.
Thank you.
Dudley
dcapillae (2023-09-18 17:21:52+00:00): Véase discusión: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141392436
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-09-22 16:05:41+00:00): revertido!
eserte (2023-11-06 15:55:10+00:00): Hi! In der Schlangenbader Straße hast du oneway:bicycle=no entfernt. Bist du sicher? Mir war so, als ob ich heute zwei Querstraßen der Wiesbadener mit Einbahnstraße-Radfahrer-frei-Schildern gesehen habe. Neben der Sodener Straße war das vermutlich auch die Schlangenbader.
Mopshase12 (2023-11-06 16:10:21+00:00): Könnte ein Kollateralschaden in StreetComplete gewesen sein, mitunter fehlt die Sicherheitsabfrage bei Einbahnstraßen. Ich ergänze die Art der RVA, die Einbahnstraßenregelungen lasse ich idR einfach aus, sofern ich sie nicht explizit kenne. Danke für den Hinweis, ich hab's manuell korrigiert.
StefanHRT (2023-11-06 16:45:46+00:00): Ist wohl ein Fehler von StreetComplete.  Du hast aber oneway:bicycle=yes anstelle von no gesetzt. Dies müsste auch auf dem Stück zur Wiesbadener gesetzt werden ;) VG
Mopshase12 (2023-11-06 16:52:08+00:00): Unkonzentriert 🙄 gefixt.
StefanHRT (2023-11-06 16:59:32+00:00): Danke
tordans (2023-11-07 09:22:47+00:00): Zur Information, ich habe das als Bug reported unter https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/5367. Hinterlasst dort gerne weitere Details da ich nur aus der Unterhaltung hier ableiten konnte, was vermutlich falsch lief oder wie es besser sein könnte.
westnordost (2023-11-07 12:11:59+00:00): Wenn ihr euch sicher seid, dass dies ein Bug oder eine fehlende Sicherheitsabfrage in StreetComplete ist, empfehle ich, den gefragten Straßenabschnitt zur Version 26 zurückzudrehen (cycleway:right=no entfernen) und nochmals die Frage in STreetComplete beantworten und dabei Screenshots machen, diese in dem verlinkten Ticket hochzuladen um zu zeigen, wo der Fehler in der UI liegt.
Mopshase12 (2023-11-07 22:17:27+00:00): Als Anhaltspunkt: Wenn man in StreetComplete einträgt, dass eine Straße keine Radwege hat (egal ob in Fahrtrichtung oder dagegen), dann wird das als cycleway:right/left/both=no hinterlegt. Ggf. wird oneway:bicycle noch auf no gesetzt oder bei Öffnung entfernt. Es gibt in diesem Fall aber immer cycleway:left=no bzw. cycleway:both=no (je nach dem). 

Im vorliegenden Fall hab ich nur die Fahrtrichtung als "ohne RVA" gekennzeichnet, aber die Gegenrichtung undefiniert gelassen. Das sieht man auch im Changeset, weil sich meine Änderung nur auf cycleway:right bezieht, nicht auf left oder both.

Vorher war die Definition "RVA rechts unbekannt; RVA links unbekannt; Einbahnstraße in Gegenrichtung offen", wobei letzteres in StreetComplete bei unbekannter RVA in Gegenrichtung so nicht angezeigt wird. In StreetComplete habe ich vermeintlich die RVA rechts ergänzt und den Rest so gelassen, wie er war. Neu wäre das dann "RVA rechts nein; RVA links wie vorher (unbekannt); Einbahnstraße in Gegenrichtung wie vorher (offen)". Nun wird "links offen mit unbekannter RVA" in StreetComplete aber nicht als solches angezeigt. Es könnte ziemlich gut sein, dass technisch keine Ergänzung von rechts passiert, sondern eine Überschreibung mit dem neuen Wert für rechts und den (vermeintlichen) Bestandswerten für links. Wenn StreetComplete Unbekannt-Offen aber nicht als solches führt, könnte dies zum Problem führen, dass unbemerkt die Gegenrichtungs-Öffnung gelöscht wird.

Ist aber nur eine Möglichkeit. Keine Ahnung, ob das stimmt.
dcapillae (2023-09-18 17:22:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141392436
aTarom (2023-09-19 17:06:19+00:00): Hola janqm, gracias por editar, no veo la fuente que usas para cambiar límites de frontera, disculpa la brevedad, hay muchos temas y falta tiempo para todo, si te puedes pasar por los canales de la comunidad y allí podemos entre todos coordinarnos mejor, en
https://t.me/osmcat
o
https://t.me/OSMes
o
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/lang-ca/69
o
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51
Saludos
janqm (2023-09-23 17:58:02+00:00): Hola, hay diversos puntos de discusion sobre si ese punto es de Andorra o de España ya que cada país lo define en su mapa como propio. En Andorra este terreno és aprovechado para la tala de leña y la caza del rebeco. Además de esto, hay documentos que acreditan el territorio como andorrano. Espero que haya servido de ayuda.
AmyCupcake (2023-09-25 07:04:45+00:00): Si hi ha una disputa territorial, la manera de mapejar-lo ha de ser amb consens de la comunitat i no unilateral per un mapejador. Amb aquest en cap, normalment l’opció que triem es una línia doble, i no dona el territori a que poble ens agrada mes.
elot360 (2023-11-03 16:55:08+00:00): A czemu został dodany jako czynny? Torowisko dalej jest w modernizacji, nieprzejezdne i niegotowe
Eurynomos (2023-11-03 19:59:10+00:00): Przeoczenie, poprawione częściowo
user_5359 (2023-09-19 16:08:17+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/556326367. What is the mean of the tag Avenida = Beira-Mar? Did you mean addr:street= Avenida Beira-Mar (in this case you miss the house number).
BladeTC (2023-09-20 00:48:29+00:00): Sorry, my mistake. I mean addr:street= Avenida Beira-Mar.
I will fix it soon.
AurélienQ (2023-09-30 11:10:33+00:00): Bonjour,
Je signale une erreur de cartographie :
Les remontée mécanique sont toujours  cartographiées avec qu'un seul way, qu'ils soient à sens unique ou non.

Je corrige donc les doublement que vous avez effectués.
Ropino (2023-09-30 10:26:50+00:00): Hi,
please check/correct:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1208862693
+ "1208862694"
"highway=access" ?
"access" is not a highway-type:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
thx in advance
Loremo (2023-10-08 15:54:57+00:00): Thx for the hint. Fixed in Changeset 142310921
jbcharron (2023-10-18 18:25:02+00:00): Salut,
Tu participes au projet Adopte une commune ? Car je suis en train de le faire dans les Vosges. Attention pas de tags descriptifs dans le nom de la mairie :)
JB
SUPER HEROS 67 (2023-10-20 19:17:58+00:00): Salut Jean-Baptiste,

Je survole de temps en temps le sujet.

Cependant, je n'avais pas encore vue passer l'information à ce moment là.

Le nom "Mairie" sur la mairie à était rajouter il y a 10 ans, cependant si tu veut le modifier je te laisse le faire, sinon je le fait.

Cordialement

SUPER HEROS 67
eggie (2023-09-19 12:55:40+00:00): Welkom bij OSM...  
Rikit Hair staat al op de kaart. Je bijdrage heb ik verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
djinnrtl (2023-09-19 14:46:25+00:00): That's really odd: Organic Maps doesn't show it to me. I do see it here on OSM.org and I see it's an old node as well... no idea. I was so proud of having found something missing lol
eggie (2023-09-19 14:50:31+00:00): Anyway   .. your contribution succeeded :)

So don't be sad.
RicoElectrico (2026-03-17 13:04:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4467274
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-18 18:40:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2523852226
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215416892

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
map per (2023-09-20 06:20:15+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Sieht gut aus, danke!
map per (2023-09-20 06:20:54+00:00): Englisch: Concerning review_requested:
Looks good, thanks!
DD1GJ (2023-09-18 19:04:23+00:00): Falsches Changeset im Änderungssatzkommentar, korrekt ist 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141426148
pán Petrík (2025-12-28 22:45:18+00:00): Hi, Simon, could you please tell me what kind of ruins are located in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11200717582#map=21/48.4556332/16.8646601&layers=C? Thanks.
szydzio (2024-03-03 12:16:28+00:00): Cześć!
Ależ ten Cypel w Jodłowie dokładnie zrobiony !
Wow!
👍
GITNE (2024-03-03 23:12:20+00:00): No, dzięki. To jest efekt zbierania danych i umieszczania ich w bazie danych, zamiast „malowania” mapy z krzesełka. Mimo tego, Cypel jest jeszcze nie dokończony, ponieważ brakuje wielu tablic. W ogóle, ta okolica wymaga jeszcze dużo pracy. Jeśli czas i możliwości pozwolą, to może się tego dorobię.

Dla porównania możesz popatrzeć na [Polanę Rekreacyjną „Świętobór”](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1120875360)
szydzio (2024-03-04 09:48:47+00:00): Cześć!
Brakujące tablice uzupełniłem w zestawie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148197651.
Uzupełniłem też brakujący drugi większy parking przy wjeździe, zaś te dwa mniejsze (way 1208882403 + 1208882404) przesunąłem do disused: bo co prawda infrastruktura pozostała, ale jest wyraźna tabliczka "zakaz parkowania" => https://i.imgur.com/eVYAyWr.jpeg
Pozdr!
szydzio (2024-03-04 09:53:14+00:00): A Świętobór 👍  :)
Ja jedynie co to staram się unikać kapitalików przy nazwach tablic, ale to już kosmetyka.
GITNE (2024-03-04 10:48:40+00:00): > Ja jedynie co to staram się unikać kapitalików przy nazwach tablic

Jak myślisz dlaczego tego nie robię i nie powinno się tego robić? Zbieramy dane faktyczne, a nie to co myślimy lub uważamy jak powinno być.
szydzio (2024-03-04 11:21:51+00:00): Cześć! 
Tak jak pisałem, to kwestia kosmetyczna, każdy ma jak widać swoje preferencje.
Oczywiście wierność zastanemu stanowi w terenie jest przeistotna (aka https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground), niemniej jednak myślę, że nie jesteśmy skazani na literalne trzymanie się jej w wielkości czcionki.
Ważne, aby treść była prawidłowa.
Ale skoro preferujesz pisownię wersalikami, to spoko.
P.S.
Ten duży parking jednak był zmapowany (sorki nie zauważyłem wcześniej), więc usunąłem swojego dubla.
Pozdr!
markbegbie (2025-01-13 08:32:34+00:00): You added address tags to a highway, which you should not do.  Also, the tags related to an address which is some distance further down the road.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141439252
jleedev (2023-09-19 19:18:30+00:00): You shouldn't add `access=no` to indicate pedestrian access. It should be `foot=no`.
MxxCon (2023-09-20 01:41:57+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit? The latest satellite imagery shows that this is some sort of construction site or a staging area for one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141439788
Frans S (2023-09-20 14:57:02+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapping them as 1 building.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141440378
eggie (2023-09-19 18:51:28+00:00): Dag Eindje Fietsen,

Met editor iD kun je eigenlijk geen routes goed bewerken. Inleggen gaat nog wel. 
Dat kan wel goed met editor JOSM.
Maar voor zover ik het nu kan zien zit de route netjes op volgorde. 

Zodra je met iD gaat knippen gaan de routes stuk. 

Dus voor routes bewerken zie.. plakken in ID. Tip; linker Alt toets vasthouden en ID plakt niet :) 

 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047 

 MVG
eggie
CurlingMan13 (2023-09-19 19:19:37+00:00): Do not overlap areas, such as what you did for the fairways and putting greens.  This throws error flags.
trial (2023-10-02 20:39:37+00:00): Salut, sur le circuit de la Pierre Bleue je vois comme membre Relation « Ligne de Plouescat à Rosporden via Landivisiau et Châteauneuf du Faou (11705193) » 
Une fausse manip je suppose.
StC (2023-10-02 21:38:42+00:00): Bonjour,
oui visiblement cela faisait un an que cette erreur est là, je ne l'ai pas remarquée lorsque j'ai corrigé l'autre erreur. Je m'en occupe.
CurlingMan13 (2023-09-18 22:16:54+00:00): I already commented many times regarding partially overlapping landcover areas.
faddie7 (2023-09-24 21:39:08+00:00): I am using Chads Tool to assist real golf course creations in tgc2019, which can be converted to pgatour2k23. The tutorials for this program that i have viewed indicate in the instructions for open street street maps that you can overlap the fairways over the greens. As in the program the green area will override the fairway. Also sand traps override rough areas. Thus there is no space between the green and fairway. Leaving a space doesnt look good.
spatialia (2023-09-18 20:17:04+00:00): The residential area formerly labeled South Land Park in this changeset should also be shrunk - it covers commercial *and* industrial areas and should be split. But for now I just wanted to get the bad labels/searches removed in preparation to add the correct neighborhood boundaries (based on the City's neighborhoods dataset) to the map
johsin18 (2023-09-20 05:56:07+00:00): Hi proton_kev,
thanks for you contribution.
Usually, we map sidewalks as separate ways only if they are physically separated from the road, e.g. by parking spaces or a bit of green inbetween. I don't think that's the case here.
Best,
johsin18
Jrachi (2023-09-19 16:53:55+00:00): Ciao.
Ottimo lavoro!
solo alcune piccole osservazioni.
La lettera della variante, secondo norma regionale dovrebbe essere maiuscola.
Su osmc_symbol però si mette come è riportata sui cartelli, ci sono usanze locali che ignorano la norma e usano la minuscola; ad esempio è così in provincia di Biella, nell'alessandrino mi sembra sia usata un po a caso.
Il 140 ha un membro con ruolo route, che non esiste, ed ha anche un'interruzione.
Interruzione, o se preferisci una vacanza, è anche nel 106C
osmann (2023-10-06 06:56:14+00:00): Bonjour.
Nous sommes habitants de Massy et nous avons observé que vous avez créé sur Openstreetmap un quartier "l'épine Montain" qui, d'après nos connaissances, n'existe pas et qui n'est pas enregistré dans le cadastre non plus.
Sur quelles sources basez-vous cet ajout, et le grand nombre d'autres ajouts (ou modifications) de "quartiers" que vous avez effectués?
Cordialement,
André
fredoh (2023-10-06 08:03:54+00:00): Bonjour André,
merci pour ton signalement.
J'ai habité Palaiseau-Le Pileu pendant de nombreuses années et j'ai, a plusieurs reprise, entendu parler (par les habitants eux même) de "l'épine Montain" (au même titre que des "Graviers" un peu plus a l'ouest). On a d'ailleurs une école maternelle portant ce patronyme dans cette zone.
De plus la carte IGN 1/25000 le mentionne également.
Mais effectivement tu as sans doute raison, le tag place=quarter n'est sans doute pas approprié. 
Que penses tu si je le remplace par place=neighbourhood ?

merci 
Frédéric
VLD165 (2023-09-19 22:01:07+00:00): Hello, i made an edit to fix this broken relation in changeset #141432547 and i noticed several edits were made shortly after that broke it again. 
pls advise how to collaborate to fix the relation.
Thanks
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-09-29 16:00:33+00:00): Hi, you shouldn't add names to roads just because some tool complains about them being unnamed. You should mark it as false-positive in that tool. I'm talking about
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/213116026
jemm (2024-01-30 16:44:02+00:00): Actually Maaamet reports this name https://xgis.maaamet.ee/xgis2/page/link/TJDnv1RT
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-01-30 17:15:15+00:00): This is a name of a cadastral unit also containing "L3" in it's name. It doesn't have to be tied to a street name.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-01-30 17:17:46+00:00): You also can notice that the street itself has no name there.

IMO we should avoid creating a "tree"with branches for streets and try keep them as a simple chain unless official data/street signs say differently.
dgmapping (2024-01-30 17:26:09+00:00): In this particular case there seems to be an official name in teeregister:
https://teeregister.mnt.ee/reet/map?featureOid=8078962
Pikse (2024-02-06 12:52:27+00:00): Other similar roads nearby, like way/213116024, are tagged as highway=service and are without name=*. I'd suggest using the same approach here.

I think it'd be better if name=* keys for streets would consistently follow official address data, that of address objects of type "liikluspind"[1], i.e. road names in the same extent they also appear on Maa-amet maps. Given adjacent road is still a different road in teeregister but confusingly may share its name with the main road (liikluspind).

Per official guidelines[2] address object and teeregister road should have the same name only if they have same extent. So this adjacent road is expected to have different name in teeregister, like "Pae - Tee 27"[3] adjacent to Pae tänav, but unfortunately not all municipalities follow this rule consistently when submitting their road data to teeregister.

If it's useful to store teeregister name here then for clarity I'd suggest using some different tag for this purpose, like teeregister:name=*.

[1] https://xgis.maaamet.ee/adsavalik/LP00023024
[2] https://maaamet.ee/aadressiandmete-kasiraamat/1313-tee-nimi-ja-liikluspinna-nimi
[3] https://teeregister.mnt.ee/reet/map?featureOid=50355
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-02-06 13:31:44+00:00): I agree with Pikse here. I wanted to write something like this, but was too lazy to formulate it in such a clear way. The fact that teeregister adds "tee xx" to adjacent road names in other places shows that there is some inconsistency here and IMO it's better to just follow Maa-amet here. Unless street signs on the ground explicitly say differently.
Patr1k_P (2023-09-21 11:01:23+00:00): podla coho ste usudili, ze to su nepresne adresy a vymazali ste niekolko adresnych vchodov?
aceman444 (2023-10-05 16:36:15+00:00): Podla fotiek Ortofoto :)
Frans S (2023-09-19 10:52:16+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Please focus on roads connecting buildings, settlements. Mapping of traces into mountains are not requested

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141442964
user_5359 (2023-09-19 16:36:28+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1208911828. What is the mean of the tags
CATEGORIA = Parques Naturales Regionales
FECHAACT = 2015-05-28 00:00
HARES = 3107.0
IDPNN = 1000
NOMBRE = Paramo de Paja Blanca Territorio Sagrado del Pueblo de los Pastos
ORG = CORPONARINO
RESOLUCION = 010
URL_FUENTE = https://runap.parquesnacionales.gov.co/area-protegida/1000
?
jorgelrm (2023-09-19 20:23:54+00:00): I imported that vector from Parques Nacionales Website (it's under Public domain because it's government data), maybe it's from the SHP vectorial shape. Could it be necessary to remove this data?
user_5359 (2023-09-20 19:12:09+00:00): Data from the original source are not useful at first, as no one can interpret them meaningfully. However, there is nothing to be said against transferring values to the correct OSM keys: e.g. source:url = https://runap.parquesnacionales.gov.co/area-protegida/1000 instead of URL_FUENTE = https://runap.parquesnacionales.gov.co/area-protegida/1000
Frans S (2023-09-19 10:43:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark. Lots of roads are tagged as 'track' despite they are connecting roads.
Please retag those when you come across them.
More info about tagging of roads
https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/

For Marocco
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Morocco#How_tagging_the_routes/ways?

Tips 
Connect nodes of highways to each other to achieve a road network which can be used by satellite navigation systems. (these cannot deal with a gap between 2 pieces of roads)

Please focus on highways which connects isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and bigger.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141443868
Frans S (2023-09-19 10:43:38+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark. Lots of roads are tagged as 'track' despite they are connecting roads.
Please retag those when you come across them.
More info about tagging of roads
https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/

For Marocco
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Morocco#How_tagging_the_routes/ways?

Tips 
Connect nodes of highways to each other to achieve a road network which can be used by satellite navigation systems. (these cannot deal with a gap between 2 pieces of roads)

Please focus on highways which connects isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and bigger.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141443868
CurlingMan13 (2023-11-14 07:04:26+00:00): Please leave more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?  "Yes" tells me nothing.

You can read more about changeset comments here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
numbs (2024-04-30 23:45:29+00:00): Hi bohemio,
I have removed the separate cycleways added in this changeset.
Per OSM wiki, "Cycling infrastructure that is an inherent part of a road - particularly "cycle lanes" which are a part of the road - should usually not be tagged as a separate cycleway, but by adding the cycleway=* tag to an existing highway=* instead."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=cycleway#When_not_to_use