piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
simo_explorer (2024-02-06 08:35:23+00:00): the keys have been corrected, an example node: https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/7147577079
Thank you
stasiu512 (2024-01-30 23:01:23+00:00): Nie jest to pas rowerowy w jezdni a DDR w jezdni.
Marek-M (2024-01-31 07:35:39+00:00): Ok, zmienię na cycleway=track https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway=track
blacx (2024-01-30 20:25:28+00:00): Et recomano que et posis la capa topografica de fons i afegeixis totes les adreces que castastro es deixa (que no son poques) i comprovis tambe una mica la geometria dels edificis, que la mitat de catastro fa llastima.

Per afegir la capa al JOSM, ves a dalt a Imagery, Imagery Preferences, clica a +WMS, i al camp 6 l'hi poses aquesta adreça

wms:https://geoserveis.icgc.cat/icc_mapesmultibase/noutm/wms/service?FORMAT=image/png&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&VERSION=1.1.1&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=topo&STYLES=&SRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}&BBOX={bbox}
blacx (2024-01-30 20:26:00+00:00): la capa topografica de ICGC, volia dir
simo_explorer (2024-02-02 15:36:02+00:00): Good morning stasiu512,
you probably added some wrong tags (bicykle), could you check?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Abicycle
thanks for collaboration
stasiu512 (2024-02-05 21:51:30+00:00): Hello simo_fi, Do you mean railway=tram_level_crossing on highway=cycleway??
if so I can change it on railway=tram_crossing
MxxCon (2024-02-06 07:10:44+00:00): "DSNY" should probably be expanded or tag renamed to operator:short
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146842098
Leo Slager (2024-01-30 22:38:40+00:00): Met de editor iD kun je helaas geen routerelaties bewerken, dat gaat altijd fout. De editor iD plakt alle de nieuwe elementen altijd achter aan de route vast. En dat leidt dan weer tot foutmeldingen van gebroken routes.
Alle beschadigde route relaties zijn weer gerepareerd.
Richard (2024-03-05 19:44:01+00:00): This is not a signposted cycle route and does not belong in OSM.
Jbah (2024-02-15 00:23:14+00:00): Moin, weiss nicht ob du die Diskussion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140847368 gesehen hattest.
Im grossen und ganzen passt aber deine Bearbeitung mit meinem Kenntnissstand und sinnvoller Bearbeitung ueberein.
Hatte eigentlich vor bei dieser Korrektur, die noch auf meiner longterm TODO stand, gleich alle (nicht vorhandenen) Schilder zu surveyen, um einen weiteren Streit nicht zu foerdern, sondern direkt Mittel in der Hand zu haben um diese Wiederspieglung der Realitaet wiederzugeben.

Das einzige was IMO nicht passt, ist bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215034579/ das bicycle=yes. ausser hier steht ein schild, dass ich bisher immer uebersehen hab, ist hier wirklich, nur ein gehweg. Lieber stattdessen ein Bicycle yes auf die Wege vom Parkplatz. Habe diese Aenderung auch gleich mal vorgenommen (das bisher keine Abfahrt vom Parkplatz moeglich war, ist auch keinem aufgefallen :D ): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147470793

Den Taxi Stand hast du auch ein zweites mal gemappt. OSM versucht je Feature ein Entry umzusetzen. Der gewaehlte Standort der Node ist auch interessant, da hier ja noch Fahrrad Parkplatz ist. 
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/11565738994

Hier an der Kreuzung hattest du einen Pfad zum Routen eingezeichnet. Statt so einen komischen diagonalen, nicht existen pfad einzuzeichnen, lieber gleich die Kreuzung einzeichnen. Hab diese Aenderung bereits implementiert, bevor ich diesen Changeset ueberhaupt bemerkt habe: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1244237277

Danke fuer deine Mitarbeit!
fdl24 (2024-02-15 02:08:04+00:00): Hi,
danke dir für die Rückmeldung und Korrekturen!

Die Diskussion hatte ich vorher noch nicht gesehen gehabt. Ich hatte mich nur durch die Wiki gegraben und versucht, das mit meinen Ortskenntnissen abzugleichen und die Vorgaben dort einzuhalten, gleichzeitig aber auch das Routing mit dem Fahrrad zu verbessern. 

Deinen Korrekturen stimme ich zu, danke auch fürs Implementieren. 
Der Taxi-Stand wird irgendwie in meiner Editing-Ansicht nicht angezeigt und ich hatte nicht ordentlich auf der Karte geschaut, dass der ja doch schon da ist. Hattest du den jetzt auch schon entfernt? 
Und die Kreuzung ist natürlich viel eleganter als mein Hilfspfad! Jemand hatte vorher schon einen gegenüber eingezeichnet und da habe ich, weil ich drüber gestolpert bin, das Pendent der Gegenseite ergänzt. Und weil ich nicht sicher war, wie man das schön macht (bin noch nicht so lang dabei), habe ich es erstmal einfach brute force aber funktional gemacht. 

Liebe Grüße
Jbah (2024-02-15 13:05:17+00:00): Ja, Taxi Stand hab ich schon entfernt. Wird leider im deep history nicht angezeigt. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11565738994
citrula (2024-01-30 11:23:14+00:00): Please be more careful drawing building outlines, and press "q" to square corners of objects you draw in iD.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146842839
aharvey (2025-01-21 05:46:50+00:00): waterway=flowline was recently documented for this purpose https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dflowline
❤️‍🔥 (2025-01-21 11:59:38+00:00): perfect, thanks for updating these :)
❤️‍🔥 (2025-01-22 21:48:18+00:00): should we also add oneway=no ? iD assumes that waterway=flowline implies oneway=yes: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/pull/10283 but these are all tidal bays
aharvey (2025-01-22 23:08:38+00:00): Interesting. oneway isn't mentioned on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:waterway or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dflowline.

However while these are tidal bays and the current changes based on the tide, downstream is still towards the ocean and the way should be drawn that way.

What would oneway=yes/no even mean in this context that's not already covered by tidal=yes/no?
aharvey (2025-01-22 23:14:22+00:00): Actually I just realised I thought the tidal tag was meant to be used on any feature that is affected by the tides, ie. the full length of the waterway from tidal limit to where it ends at the ocean, but seems from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tidal it should only be the small section between high tide and low tide.
❤️‍🔥 (2025-01-23 03:55:19+00:00): okay, maybe it's fine as is. It felt a bit weird, but I guess having a direction makes sense
Frans S (2024-01-30 15:40:39+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146843375
Glassman (2024-01-31 20:01:15+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146843477
Fizzie-DWG (2024-08-09 05:19:59+00:00): Reverted by DWG for apparent fictitious mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155005234
Warin61 (2024-01-30 10:22:26+00:00): PTv2 requires;
 'stops' to be before the train tracks
and 
'stops' to be in sequence. 

You should fix this simple error so you know what to do for next time.
❤️‍🔥 (2024-01-30 10:44:35+00:00): sorry, fixed now. seems to be caused by another bug in iD: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4978
Chris Fleming (2024-01-30 18:04:15+00:00): What are you usingas a source for this?
ti-lo (2024-01-30 21:17:24+00:00): An aerial picture
aceman444 (2024-02-11 13:00:26+00:00): Ak je budova https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1244255088 rozostavana, potom building=construction.

Preco je https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2494913810 len umelecke dielo a nie pamatnik na danu osobu? Aj tak ste konverziu na umelecke dielo neurobili spravne, memorial=statue tam zostalo.

Tam ste presunuli adersu URL diskgolfu z https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/547727452 ? Alebo ste ju uplne stratili? To by bola skoda. Hej, zda sa, ze stranka nefunguje, ale ihrisko ma aj ine stranky, napr. https://www.discgolf.sk/ihrisko/detail/3. Mal by byt nejaky spolocny objekt leisure=pitch, sport=discgolf, kde by sa tieto spolocne vlastnosti zadali. Ale pri takto roztahanych jamkach tiez neviem ako to vytvorit.

Aky sport sa hra na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/985989201 ?

Budova https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/985989201 naozaj neexistuje? Ale na vsetkych fotkach este je, takze by bolo vhodnejsie ju zmenit na removed:building=yes , aby ju niekto podla fotiek znovu nezakreslil.

Zda sa, ze budova https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1244255093 bola uplna duplicita a uz to niekto upratal.

Naopak, pridal som budovu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1249069150, ktoru je vidiet na fotkach. Tu by ste prosim mohli overit na mieste, ci existuje.
1Mmarek (2024-02-11 15:41:32+00:00): poporade:

- building: construction je lepšie, ďakujem (akože zvonka je už hotová, iba nemá interiérové vybavenie a je neprístupná)

- nevedel som, že je taký tag

- ihrisko by sa ťažko kreslilo + niektoré jamky jednoducho zanikli (na ich mieste postavili tú novú budovu)

- aktuálne je to také to ihrisko na všetky neseriózne športy... má tam aj nejaké veci pre skejtbordy, aj basketbalové koše, ale je fakt že rozbité

- link mi nefunguje, ak myslíte tú pred internátmi, tak už je skutočne zbúraná, už po nej neostala ani stopa (neviem, či mám nejak priložiť fotky alebo čo). Ak myslíte budovy okolo školy, tak tie okolo novopostaveného pavilónu boli tiež všetky zbúrané.

- tá budova nie je duplicitná, skutočne sú vedľa seba dve budovy skoro rovnakého tvaru, len z iných materiálov (jedna je betónová garáž, druhá je z natretého vlnitého plechu)

- áno, existuje, ďakujem. Je to transformátor, možno mám niekde na fotke aj jeho číslo
Glassman (2024-02-02 19:47:45+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: Microsoft buildings are known for not being square. To square a building select the outline then just type a "q" they will look more professional.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146844614
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-02-07 13:40:12+00:00): highway tags don't go on relations
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146844722
Glassman (2024-02-02 19:49:55+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

Bus stops typically have more info in the node. Read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport for more information of the subject.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146844787
Damelin (2024-02-03 23:32:05+00:00): Hello Dmazybo,

first of all this is a great addition and it is nice to see that somebody seems to maintain that area!
But why did you delete some of the driveways I've added a year ago like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1138359718/history ?
I've found the following in the wiki:
> Mapping private buildings, private roads (including driveways), private parking is considered as completely acceptable. Add access=private as appropriate to roads, parking lots etc. However, annoying artifacts will appear in applications like Pokémon Go with short driveways.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information

Best regards Damelin
nevw (2024-01-30 06:25:59+00:00): Hi, you have added amenity=post_office to the Neil Mansel Transport point.
I would have expected company=logistics or company=transport instead.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:company%3Dlogistics
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:company%3Dtransport
nevw (2024-01-30 10:00:40+00:00): Changed to company=transport
nevw (2024-01-30 10:15:35+00:00): Corrected name, postcode, added suburb, phone
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:08:19+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146845298
chinook17 (2024-02-18 15:06:54+00:00): Bonjour, peux-tu remettre la bande cyclable sur Galt et enlever la piste cyclable que tu as créée? Malheureusement l'arrondissement n'en est pas encore là! ;)
Pour l'instant, cycleway lane suffit lorsqu'il n'y a que de la peinture entre la voie principale et les voitures stationnées.
emersonveenstra (2024-01-30 12:02:13+00:00): Hi there,

This changeset broke the relation for Stony Point (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/135224#map=14/41.9415/-83.2740) by closing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34372233 (see https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/34372233 for visual diff). Could you please fix this? Thanks!
LocalMapGuru (2024-02-07 15:30:29+00:00): Hi there!

Terribly sorry about that.  I will get to this shortly and will reply again with the changeset with corrections.

Thanks.
LocalMapGuru (2024-02-09 17:17:44+00:00): Should be corrected now.  Please back-check:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147265869#map=15/41.9416/-83.2741&layers=N

Strangely enough, I don't think I may have been the one to mangle it in my changeset but regardless, this should be fixed by the above.

Thanks.
Diacritic (2024-04-23 01:54:07+00:00): Hi Pots.

You are wrong.

Please look at the latest aerial imagery (NOT Bing).

This parking aisle has long been removed.
Ewen Hill (2024-01-30 11:46:43+00:00): Hi Kieran, thanks for lopping off the private driveway. Can I offer a suggestion please? It would have been better to split the residential road into two (short cut x) and then set the driveway to
highway=service
service=driveway
access=private

Once again, thanks for the edit
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146845758
Ewen Hill (2024-01-30 11:48:27+00:00): Hi Kieran as per the other changeset, I suggest changing the private driveway sections to
highway=service
service=driveway
access=private

All the best
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146845864
Glassman (2024-01-31 20:01:30+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146846342
kucai (2024-02-01 04:10:47+00:00): bos, flower shop ka atau mini nursery? 
kalau kedai bunga, tambah shop=florist, 
kalau mini nursery boleh tambah shop=garden_centre. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dgarden_centre
Glassman (2024-01-31 19:42:31+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146846640
mavl (2024-01-30 17:10:21+00:00): Здравствуйте. Возможно, ошибка в номере телефона (в номер попала буква).   
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429830178
BCNorwich (2024-01-31 08:26:22+00:00): Hello, Concerning the paths you recently added, Way: 1235864075, Way: 1235861531 and Way: 1235862015.  You placed these paths zig zagging across and in part duplicating existing paths. It looks like there are three named hiking routes using this line. In which case the three routes should share the one path line.

It is OSM practice that if a way needs amending/correcting then the existing way is amended, (not duplicated). Thus your new route should share the existing one path and a route relation should be created for your new path route.

Need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
user_177389 (2024-01-30 06:26:41+00:00): Please do not randomly convert multipolygons to administrative boundaries or add them as subareas. This is wrong and only becomes apparent when you look at the boundaries as a whole. In addition, the place information is lost.
Ivanerr (2024-01-30 15:44:41+00:00): Привет, в русском OSM есть устоявшаяся договоренность о том, как писать: "улица Красноармейская" или "Красноармейская улица", чтобы все было в масштабах страны более-менее одинаково. Посмотри, пожалуйста, по ссылке: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

Приглашаю присоединиться к телеграм-каналу OSM России по ссылке https://t.me/ruosm
user_20948960 (2024-01-30 05:50:20+00:00): Neue Gebäude an der Ziller
woodpeck_repair (2024-01-30 09:35:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146855611 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits einer beautifulplaces-sockenpuppe
TrickyFoxy (2024-04-08 08:57:53+00:00): Яндекс использовать нельзя
这里没有鱼 (2024-01-31 02:12:52+00:00): 不要删除路名。已回退
syntex (2024-01-31 12:18:24+00:00): masz może jakieś źródło? wiem, że pewnie pod CPK, ale skąd wiesz, że konkretnie te budynki są burzone?
adas (2024-01-31 13:21:16+00:00): Tutaj info:
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/polska-centralny-port-lotniczy-w%C4%85tek-merytoryczny-polityka-brig.165614/page-401#post-187108228
这里没有鱼 (2024-01-31 02:08:05+00:00): 不要在这里测试。已回退
HaPe-CZ (2024-01-31 20:02:50+00:00): Why are you devastating the maps? A parking space is not a taxiway for planes !!! Deliberately damaging the work of many editors.
Warin61 (2024-02-01 09:37:52+00:00): ??? Eh?  No motor vehicle parking spaces were changed to areoways.  Your changes may be well intentioned but.. think about it!

The intention was to change ways with areoway=parking_position to areoways=apron. A parking position should be a stationary spot? Not the way to the stationary spot. 

aeroway=parking_position – Where the plane parks

The presentness areoway=gate are wrong - those should be inside the terminal where passengers go before they enter the plane. These 'gates' are the plane parking positions! 

Think.
HaPe-CZ (2024-02-01 10:03:42+00:00): see help: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dparking_position

aeroway=parking_position out of terminal on appron, aeroway=gate is inside building terminal or not?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dgate

Wow :o ... "These 'gates' are the plane parking positions!"... please see HELP !!!
Warin61 (2024-02-01 10:33:32+00:00): See 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10178481999 
amongst others. 

Thank you for moving some of the 'gates' inside the terminal buildings. 

also see for more on taxiway taxilanes... 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Taxilane

I have raised the 'parking_position' being used as a way on the tagging list. Lets see what the tagging experts think?  I note there has been on proposal on the 'parking_possition'.
HaPe-CZ (2024-02-01 11:26:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1017848199 ... it is not a my work !!! go and FIRST READ HELP, it si bad point of other editor. 
Please use your head, think logically before you destroy something. You're using arguments based on the wrong tags of a previous edit.
Warin61 (2024-02-02 10:31:28+00:00): I did not say it was 'your work'. 

What do you think of the 'taxilane' tag? It does distinguish between one control area and another control area...
HaPe-CZ (2024-02-03 13:53:59+00:00): 1) "At many airports, aeroway=taxiway is also used within apron areas, however". Unless the apron is divided into several smaller ones, but here the aprons are divided and the taxiway passes between them. In other words. If one huge and complete apron is drawn then the taxiway will pass through the cross. That's not here.
2) Taxilane / Parking_posirion , using Parking_position is universal (simpler), can be a point and a line.
Additionally, the help for Parking_positioin states "draw a line from the taxiway to the stopping point and mark Pakking_position". The description of Taxilane in the help is also a bit confusing because it also refers to the runway.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-02-24 12:31:29+00:00): OSM不是随心所欲的涂鸦画板，您的编辑都意味着可能有依赖于OSM的导航软件误入歧途
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-02-01 13:31:24+00:00): Hallo  Feuerwehr-Schwarmstedt,

der name-Tag ist nur für echte Eigennamen in Openstreetmap gedacht. Wenn diese Namen interne Bezeichnungen sind, dann bitte hierfür den Tag ref (="Referenzcode" in OSMHydrant) verwenden oder als Beschreibung eintragen.

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-30 07:30:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1023353271

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-01-30 08:09:51+00:00): Dag NP 

Dit is wel een heel korte periode to 2 febr.. In zo'n geval kun je de weg gewoon openlaten. 
Voordat de routers dit oppikken in hun updates is de weg immers al weer open. 
Het principe van de tagging is wel oke. 

MVG
eggie
BTC Map (2025-02-13 04:27:42+00:00): Hi! Does this place still accept bitcoins?
maraf24 (2024-02-08 11:43:38+00:00): Wycofane, niezgodne ze stanem faktycznym.
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-31 03:42:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in part or full. These features are still visible in aerial imagery. Access tags should be used instead of deleting the features. You can read why deletion is not the solution here: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property 

Please don’t do that; in OSM, if a trail/road exists but is not usable (due to being closed, private or similar) we use the so-called “access tags” to record the fact. OSM maps the world as it is using aerial imagery and other similarly acceptable sources that are available.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146886162
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-13 14:36:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147411925, 147411908 where the changeset comment is: Revert von Edits von Sockenpuppen eines Benutzers mit Hausverbot
tux67 (2024-01-30 11:11:21+00:00): Hallo MöBus KundenCenter,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, dass du mithelfen möchtest, die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Die Bearbeitungen habe ich beide nochmal angepasst, damit die Angabe der Öffnungszeiten und die Art des POI den standards von OSM entsprechen.


Prima, dass du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56

Für eine Qualitätssicherung, an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146852022
Layft Greater (2024-02-08 22:24:25+00:00): Camera is already mapped nearby.
Layft Greater (2024-02-09 12:21:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11519338431
SomeoneElse (2024-02-06 17:04:04+00:00): Hello,
Andy from the DWG here.  We've had a report of fake names getting added here.
What sources did you verify the user's request to change names here?
This ian't the first time that users have tried to add fake names to OSM via this mechanism.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group