piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:31:19+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 17 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/559054749 v1 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/329369038 v3 | 8 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5392577733 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178066582
NeisReview (2026-02-12 05:05:08+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178121476
marcmarti (2026-02-20 17:55:10+00:00): Vicenç, ja t'he intentat contactar dos cops sense resposta. Reverteixo aquest conjunt de canvis perquè no són projectes ficticis. Abans de revertir contacta amb mi
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:31:19+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1472774098 v4 | 7 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178066649
NeisReview (2026-02-12 05:05:08+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178098649
Langlaeufer (2026-06-04 08:57:45+00:00): Ich glaubt du müsstet mal über alle deine Massen-Edits gehen und die Datenprobleme beheben. Ich finde hier ganz viele nicht verbundene Linien, verwaiste (übergebliebene) Punkte ohne Eigenschaften, Überlappende Gebäude etc.
Langlaeufer (2026-06-04 09:11:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183633188
osmmapper222 (2026-06-04 20:08:47+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis und die Korrekturen im verlinkten Changeset.

Die von mir bearbeiteten Gebiete schaue ich mir mal näher mit Osmose und JOSM an, um die Datenprobleme zu finden und zu beheben.
YomanNH (2026-02-04 11:12:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1473987542 - ten chodnik istnieje, czy jest to marzenie/fikcja/urojenie/wandalizm?
YomanNH (2026-02-09 08:43:21+00:00): Wycofałem bzdury.
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:31:20+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1472774098 v4 | 7 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178066920
NeisReview (2026-02-12 05:05:09+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178098649
Fen <3 (2026-02-04 22:33:33+00:00): this change-set added disc golf baskets, which where not recognized by the app
Frans S (2026-04-01 14:16:36+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
This is a building and highway mapping project. Do not, NOT, map other features.
You mapped very many small pieces of farmland that are mapped with errors and will be deleted. You could spend the time more effectively by mapping the required objects, 
Best regards
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:31:22+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1472774098 v5 | 7 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178067403
eggie (2026-02-03 21:55:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
samminhch (2026-03-25 17:11:28+00:00): Why did I get a thumbs down :(
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178067570
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:32:56+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1473990634 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Imobiliária Matias Riviera"
---
Por exemplo, uma versão mais neutra e factual do seu texto poderia ser: "Imobiliária Matias Riviera"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 05:55:00+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178437131
(No visible changes after review)
A67-A67 (2026-02-14 01:17:39+00:00): In deze wijziging wordt het woongebied van Rijen (landuse=residential) verwijderd. 

Ik zie vaker woongebieden verdwijnen in onvoorzichtige BAG-updates. Het is dan moeilijk om deze wijziging terug te vinden. Graag aandacht hiervoor!
Sander H (2026-02-15 12:56:35+00:00): Heeft niet veel met een BAG update te maken, maar met werken in JOSM.
Als je ergens dubbelklikt, blijkt ie de eerste de beste way te selecteren die erbuiten ligt, ook als dat buiten het zichtbare deel valt. En als je dan wat oude panden aan het opschonen bent voor nieuwbouw merkte ik al dat het soms op deze manier mis gaat. Blijkbaar mis ik er wel eens eentje...
Misschien eens een building filter aanzetten om te zien of het dan minder vaak mis gaat.
Frans S (2026-02-07 16:35:16+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Why did you add a layer 1 to a highway.?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1473994174/history#map=18/34.122691/66.531932
Don't add these layers unless you are mapping bridges or viaducts.
Best regards
Layft Greater (2026-02-03 21:33:10+00:00): note 5149863
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-06 01:44:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13522832196

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-06 01:44:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1473997901

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Rogoyski (2026-05-02 12:43:06+00:00): Skąd wiadomo, że jest to "Pozostałość Jarmarku Europa"? Nazwa taka sugeruje jakąś ciągłość i powiązanie z funkcjonującym niegdyś pod taką nazwą bazarem.
YacoobPL (2026-05-05 20:53:16+00:00): Analiza zdjęć historycznych na warszawskim geoportalu - bazar się zmniejszał, zmniejszał, aż został tylko ten jeden zreprywatyzowany fragment.
Rogoyski (2026-05-06 18:53:47+00:00): Niech będzie. Ale z drugiej strony, skoro to działka wciąż prywatna, to pewnie zawsze miała innego zarządcę niż Jarmark Europa.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-06 01:44:44+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13522877607

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:33:07+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11590724184 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Laundromat"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 05:55:00+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178437132
(No visible changes after review)
5m4u9 (2026-02-04 02:03:38+00:00): Hello, this change seems strange to me! It allows cars to drive against traffic on Melchor Urquidi Avenue.

The latest image on Mapillary (Nov/2024) shows that the direction is from west to east -> https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-17.3756828&lng=-66.1496674&z=17&dateFrom=2024-01-01&pKey=8709654735749325&focus=photo

I'll go and check it out!
Alva_01 (2026-02-04 04:30:44+00:00): Hi! Nice to meet you, friend. Yep, you can verify it by looking at the minibus "3" whenever it comes from the east.
SpinOff (2026-02-04 21:06:05+00:00): Hej. Wyczyściłem resztę okolicy.
Musisz popracować jeszcze nad opisami swoich zmian. Więcej informacji można znaleźć tutaj: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
GanderPL (2026-03-04 10:19:38+00:00): Zastanawiam się czy nie byłoby bardziej poprawnie:

highway=footway
bicycle=designated
segregated=no

gdyż piesi mają tu pierwszeństwo a rowery są dopuszczone.
GanderPL (2026-03-04 10:21:00+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Ddesignated
NeisBot (2026-02-03 22:56:22+00:00): Hi elb, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 228 amenity(s)
- 228 surface(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178070973
woodpeck (2026-02-03 23:01:07+00:00): looks legit - deletion count is high because every single parking space was mapped.
elb (2026-02-04 01:44:59+00:00): Yes, exactly.  This lot is being removed and a building is being erected in its place.  It will be a multi-year (or at least more than one year) project, and in that time period it will be blocked off for construction.
MassCartog (2026-02-04 20:00:42+00:00): Hi seems like you have had a OSM account for a long time, but wanted to remind you trails being on private property isn't a valid reason to remove them if they still exist.

The correct way to handle this is to tag them access=private, or access=no if they are closed to the public.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property
eggie (2026-02-04 08:16:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Probeer indien mogelijk direct op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen svp.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
rarad74 (2026-02-04 11:28:49+00:00): Hi. Please add type of service road. For petrol stations you should use drivetrough.
Thanks.
dlegg73 (2026-02-05 18:37:10+00:00): Hello, rarad74. I left the service road without the additional service=drive-through tag as according to OSM guidelines, this tag is intended “to indicate that a highway is for drive-through service where customers can visit a business without leaving their cars.” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddrive-through). Since drive-through gas stations where customers remain in their vehicles are not common, I wasn’t convinced it applied in this case. That said, I’m happy to defer to your edits should you choose to apply the tag.
rarad74 (2026-02-05 18:40:51+00:00): Hi. The problem is you didnt put any. It work with driveway too.
dlegg73 (2026-02-05 23:22:09+00:00): Hi rarad74,
I was wondering if you could point me to any policy or guidance that states every service road should have a service=* tag applied. My understanding has been that these tags are meant to be used only when they clearly match the definitions in the OSM wiki, rather than being required for all highway=service roads. Reviewing the service=driveway wiki, the “Usage” section doesn’t appear to include fuel station roads within the described criteria (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway). Likewise, the examples on the highway=service wiki suggest that a service road accessing a fuel station doesn’t require any additional designation beyond highway=service (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice). 

I also haven’t noticed service=driveway or service=drive-through being commonly used for fuel station service roads in Romania or elsewhere in OSM, which is why I wanted to double-check my understanding. Is this approach based on a consensus from a public forum discussion or perhaps something from the ROU OSM Telegram? I may just be missing it, but I haven’t been able to find anything about this on the ROU wiki so far.

Thanks in advance!
-dlegg73
rarad74 (2026-02-06 11:32:51+00:00): The service road type is put for a purpose and it is usable in any situation where there are service roads. That's why there are these tags added in the editors. They are not put for nothing. I did not invent it. AND in addition, I do not have to give you explanations why I put them on the map. If you want to put them well, if not, better not put them incomplete. No one forces you, I did not force you. Wikipedia is only indicative. Tomorrow maybe I will start changing something and write what I want in the wikipedia documentation. In each country some rules are followed. If in general service road type tags were put, then this rule should be respected by all new editors. With this I think I have ended this useless discussion for good.
vinesnts (2026-02-03 23:43:01+00:00): Consider also law number 7.365, changing street name from Estrada do Cajá to Avenida Flora do Brasil.
eggie (2026-02-04 08:33:39+00:00): Dag OSM De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. In OSM zetten we geen spatie in de postcode-format.

MVG
eggie
xoanin05 (2026-02-04 00:33:49+00:00): Borrado de trazado especulativo de la Línea 4. El proyecto no está en construcción ni tiene aprobación definitiva actual. Según las normas de OSM, no se deben mapear propuestas a largo plazo ('proposed') que no tengan obras activas o trazado oficial inminente. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%25C3%25ADnea_4_(Metro_de_Sevilla)&ved=2ahUKEwjw5dK4xb6SAxX8NfsDHZ2fPakQFnoECBsQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2Pg3mEsztfrg-70VUmECAZ
xoanin05 (2026-02-04 00:34:26+00:00): Borrado del trazado de la Línea 2. El proyecto constructivo original está obsoleto y actualmente en fase de revisión técnica por la administración. Al no haber trazado definitivo aprobado ni obras en ejecución, no debe figurar en el mapa según las normas de OSM
xoanin05 (2026-02-04 00:48:07+00:00): Borrado de trazado especulativo de la Línea 4. El proyecto no está en construcción ni tiene aprobación definitiva actual. Según las normas de OSM, no se deben mapear propuestas a largo plazo ('proposed') que no tengan obras activas o trazado oficial inminente. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%25C3%25ADnea_4_(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:Metro_de_Sevilla)&ved=2ahUKEwjw5dK4xb6SAxX8NfsDHZ2fPakQFnoECBsQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2Pg3mEsztfrg-70VUmECAZ
xoanin05 (2026-02-04 00:50:16+00:00): Borrado del trazado de la Línea 2. El proyecto constructivo original está obsoleto y actualmente en fase de revisión técnica por la administración. Al no haber trazado definitivo aprobado ni obras en ejecución, no debe figurar en el mapa según las normas de OSM
5m4u9 (2026-02-04 02:14:44+00:00): Hola, voy a revertir este cambio porque no mencionas cual es tu fuente. 

Tras la ultima visita en diciembre 2025, la antonio quijarro era imposible hacer de subida, las otras fueron direccionadas tras la inauguración del puente sobre la melchor y río rocha... quizá la gente usa mal la via en contraruta, pero aquí prevalece lo oficial en señales de tránsito antes que el mal uso.

de todas formas visitaré el lugar mañana miércoles a revisar estas calles (buenos aires y zenon s.)
Alva_01 (2026-02-04 04:47:31+00:00): Hola nuevamente! Sí se mencionó la fuente como 'conocimiento local', pero entiendo que tengas dudas respecto a si coincide con el diseño oficial vigente. Sin embargo, ese cruce por la quijarro hacia el norte ya era posible desde poco después que se instaló el semáforo tiempo atrás (e incluso del norte o del este hacia el sud con cuidado de respetar los semáforos). Ojalá posteriormente decidas cambiar de opinión

De todos modos, gracias por tomarte el tiempo de verificar todo eso y por todas las contribuciones en general. Que tengas un bendecido resto de la semana
5m4u9 (2026-02-04 17:04:04+00:00): Gracias a vos por responder!  Normalmente, no responden y es grato leer feedback local. 

Bueno, también rige si no está prohibido está permitido! y creo que se aplica aquí. Veremos.

De todas formas pasaré por ahí para añadir más negocios y algunos nombres de edificios que faltan.
5m4u9 (2026-02-06 02:32:31+00:00): Bueno, pasé por el lugar y sí tu cambio está bien y queda.

Antes había flechas en el suelo que indicaba el sentido, pero ahora ya no hay ni tampoco hay las señales de sentido en las esquinas, así que no esta prohibido está permitido :)

En ka Quijarro desde la Buenos Aires a la América, es muy peligroso casi vi 2 accidentes porque confiados bajan y en la curva de la policía se encuentran con un auto subiendo. Hay una señal de no estacionar para los que suben hacia la América, ahí se confirma que permiten esa circulación.

En la Zenon Salinas y Melchor es otro peligro, la calle no da para doble vía, pero pusieron un semáforo en la dirección este->oeste así que permiten de facto esa circulación.. Es un caso, ver cuando se encuentran 2 autos grandes en calle tan angosta se tienen que arrinconar en los garajes para dar paso.

En fin, gracias por las mejoras!
Alva_01 (2026-02-07 21:46:20+00:00): Es un gusto haber podido contribuir un poco y estoy de acuerdo con tus observaciones y comentarios. Gracias de nuevo por todo el tiempo y esfuerzo que te tomas verificando y mejorando todo. Hasta luego, y bendiciones nuevamente!
hoserab (2026-02-04 20:07:22+00:00): Hello Ava,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

For your information I have reverted the changes you've made here, and elsewhere around Lower Mount Royal. You have accidentally added duplicate building ways on top of ones that were already mapped, and have misapplied the `height=*` tag.

`height` is used to tag the actual height of a feature in metres. You added `height=2` to several buildings in about a dozen changesets, which means "the actual height of this building is two metres". I know is not factually true; that would make for very short buildings, given I am almost two metres tall! :P 

I suspect you may have meant to tag building levels instead. `building:levels=2` would mean "this building has two levels above grade".

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:height and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels for more info.

It may also be beneficial as a new mapper for you to read the beginners' guide at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Cheers
AvaV2026 (2026-02-07 03:45:24+00:00): Hi there, thank you so much for your words of wisdom. Truthfully this is my first time editing OSM for a lab at school... I truly was just trying to follow directions so I am sorry if I messed anything up!!
Frans S (2026-02-11 11:33:41+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Please map more accurate ; recessed parts and extensions are to be followed accurately.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178074629
Till_btn (2026-02-04 18:24:58+00:00): Hallo, 
UG war schon richtig, das ist keine Aktiengesellschaft, siehe auch https://www.heide-express.de/impressum/
Habe die Bezeichnung korrigiert: www.osm.org/changeset/178106763
Julewuff (2026-02-05 11:16:11+00:00): Ja, mit AG lag ich falsch, jedoch ist die Geschäftsform der UG seit ca mitte letzen Jahres nicht mehr aktuell, da die Geschäftsform geändert wurde.
Richtig ist "GmbH" (siehe impressum)

Ich mach mich nachher ran und korrigiere von HBEK bis HLBS durch, sobald ich Strom für mein Laptop zur Verfügung habe.
Bis dahin wünsche ich noch n angenemen Tag und bis zur nächsten konstruktiven Diskussion
Till_btn (2026-02-05 11:38:43+00:00): Oh tatsächlich, ich hätte noch einen Satz weiter lesen sollen...
"[...] und dazu die Bleckeder Kleinbahn UG (haftungsbeschränkt) gegründet. Seit 2024 ist die Bleckeder Kleinbahn eine GmbH."

https://www.heide-express.de/bleckeder-kleinbahn/reaktivierung/
QuiLe (2026-02-04 03:02:58+00:00): Added an alley way in Dallas, Texas....
julcnx (2026-06-16 04:09:00+00:00): Hi, some of the ways tagged `surface=clay` in this changeset appear to be laterite roads. `surface=laterite` was approved on 2026-06-15 and describes this surface more precisely. Would you be comfortable retagging? Happy to do it if you prefer. More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=laterite
Kovoschiz (2026-02-04 10:35:37+00:00): They are on 2 levels for departure and arrival (and this should be `level:ref=` not `level=` , from app limitation)
f_husni (2026-05-23 08:10:53+00:00): Hallo GrabID_FaizahM. editan sebelumnya adalah editan dari orang lokal setempat. mohon dikembalikan ke editan sebelumnya atau anda lakukan survei langsung untuk memastikan keadaan lapangan terupdate. terimakasih
f_husni (2026-05-23 08:13:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5020275637  tolong di notice yaa. karena menurut orang lokal setempat bundaran ini sudah ditutup oleh cones.
GrabID_FaizahM (2026-05-25 02:25:55+00:00): halo, tagnya sudah dikembalikan menjadi access=no. terima kasih atas feedbacknya
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-06 08:59:50+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13523228839/history has amenity = office that was added in this edit
It should be rather tagged with office=* tag, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office