piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Snort (2026-07-20 15:51:32+00:00): Okay, I have changed it to public access, I hope it's more proper.
norgis (2026-07-20 19:53:24+00:00): Well, no, because bicycle=yes could be interpreted as "this path is suitable for bikes". No need to add bicycle=yes to highway=path, as that is already implied *unless othwerwise given*. I had already fixed it, so I have now undone your latest changes.
Snort (2026-07-20 20:01:05+00:00): Okay, thank you anyway, I had no clue how to fix it other way so it's good that you did it right.
alpacaMaps (2026-07-31 02:38:46+00:00): This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.

If these cameras are real, please let us know so the map stays accurate. Otherwise, we'd kindly ask that you avoid adding cameras that aren't actually there, and that you remove any temporary or test nodes once you're done.

If this was simply a mistake, no problem at all — just clean up the nodes that don't correspond to a real-world camera, and leave a quick note here so we can help.

Thanks for helping keep OpenStreetMap accurate.

— alpacaMaps
Tomas_J (2026-07-26 11:26:52+00:00): Prosim, nelepit landuse na cesty (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1540307911) - neda sa s tym potom pracovat. Dik.
dmjab13 (2026-07-20 14:23:39+00:00): i didn't know vermont reached all the way to florida
Craigue & Co (2026-07-20 15:07:28+00:00): LOL! Yep, I appear to have forgotten to save between changes. Apologies!
archie (2026-07-19 22:11:49+00:00): Hej, varför kopplar du ihop vattendraget och elkraftledningarna med gemensamma noder? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14027536886#map=19/57.659986/13.041816  

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14027536887

Det är långt ifrån första gången detta händer. Jag har rättat en hel del sådana tillfällen. 
Skulle du kunna vara en aning mera omsorgsfull när du ritar in vattendragen? Tack i så fall!
archie (2026-07-20 15:51:28+00:00): Det här är alltså bara 2 utav 41 st liknande förekomster i hela Götaland. Kan man göra så pass många fel manuellt eller rör det sig om automatiska importer?
Sedan finns det 49 liknande, dvs gemensamma noder mellan vattendrag och väg/gata i samma område.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12398647925
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12398647926
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12437320828
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12491972056
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12491972096
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12560010650
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13348709289
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13358022545
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13382124569
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13427745706
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13447947737
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13447947738
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13449025174
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13464966679
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13465075169
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13465075171
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13465075172
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13465075173
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13465193451
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13481836385
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13475115633
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13483299940
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13483299941
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13502696699
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13507564881
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13513029684
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13522730533
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13588190244
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13607768270
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13639404068
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13670283370
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13673044599
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13673044602
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13675303345
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13676324374
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13700088855
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13739966751
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14021962071
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14022136085
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14027536886
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14027536887
archie (2026-07-22 14:55:11+00:00): Allt detta är nu rättat (fixat).
ScrawnyMeowth1 (2026-07-25 00:04:16+00:00): Thanks for helping update businesses in College Place! Just a reminder to write detailed changeset comments so that other editors can see what you are changing. Also, you might want to double-check the spelling of "College" in some of the addresses you added.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-07-27 08:45:56+00:00): Yolların bazı kısımlarının adına K28 ibaresini eklemişsiniz. name=* etiketine yazlnızca ad yazılmalı. Numaraları eklemek istiyorsanız ref=* etiketinin birçok alt etiketi var, onları inceleyiniz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref#Key_variations

Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Name_is_the_name_only
alpacaMaps (2026-07-19 22:02:38+00:00): Nodes you have added to these locations in the past have been proven to not be there by Conway locals. 

— alpacaMaps
alpacaMaps (2026-07-19 22:02:37+00:00): Nodes you have added to these locations in the past have been proven to not be there by Conway locals. 

— alpacaMaps
Enzo3094 (2026-07-19 22:14:07+00:00): Please cancel this changeset as it does not fit the "Roundabouts" paragraph in the "Highway link" article.
Enzo3094 (2026-07-23 22:18:29+00:00): Reverted back by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186261458
eggie (2026-07-19 22:25:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

What do you mean with Menno's Heimat.
Greetz,
eggie
McVanish (2026-07-19 22:28:51+00:00): Hi Eggie,

My name is Menno and its my home (Heimat in German)
eggie (2026-07-19 22:32:48+00:00): Okay Menno..but personal info is not allowed on the map according the convention of OSM.
Please delete your contribution.
You are ofcourse welcome but no personal info.
Greetz,
eggie
McVanish (2026-07-19 22:35:57+00:00): Prima, ik had beide persoonlijke verwijzingen al verwijderd.
eggie (2026-07-19 22:39:32+00:00): 👍
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-27 14:47:42+00:00): Hi, thanks for these, they seem to line up well and be good shapes. Just a note on the tagging. I think building=terrace should be kept for an (unsplit) terrace row and for individual houses, as you've done here, it should be building=house, house=terraced, which I've fixed these to
aharvey (2026-07-24 02:12:58+00:00): These changes look problematic for example you've taking a node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1886265360/history with 14 year history of changes and replace it with your own brand new node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14027610507

The history should be retained.

Also for some of the other stations that you've converted to an area, the JOSM replace geometry tool should have been used so that the node is placed on the way to retain some level of history...

Would you prefer to fix this or should we revert the changeset then try and apply some of the fixes again?
Mark Pokorny (2026-07-24 03:07:47+00:00): I was actually more worried about changing the history of the rail that the Hamilton node with the original tags was attached to, which is why I didn’t want to delete it completely. In my previous railway tagging in the UK (admittedly ten years or more ago now) there was a campaign to detach station nodes from the infrastructure they were attached to, and I thought, as this was the only node like that that I encountered recently, that it had been missed in a similar campaign. In a weird way, trying to retain the history of the way ended up with me destroying the history of the node. I have no problem with that edit being reverted if it’s preferred it remain the way it was.

The stations with areas are actually ones I converted to a node in a somewhat similar way to the Hamilton node. Again, it was from previous outdated guidance I was using. I read later on that areas can be used for stations too, so I attempted to restore it back to the way it was, but I’ve somehow made it worse. I’m happy to have those edits reverted too if it restores the correct history.

In both cases, my apologies for the confusion - I was doing three projects at once and ended up doing none of them well…
eggie (2026-07-19 22:27:23+00:00): Hi Mc

Wat bedoel je met Chez Menno.
We zetten geen persoonlijke informatie op de kaart.
Graag reactie.
Greetz,
eggie
McVanish (2026-07-19 22:31:04+00:00): ah ok dat wist ik niet - ik ben nieuw hier. Vertel mij wat wel wat niet mag/kan
eggie (2026-07-19 22:35:00+00:00): Hier wat richtlijnen waar je rekening mee kunt houden.

Good practice   
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice

Ik zal je per PB nog onze welkomstmail sturen met wat handige tips. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-19 22:38:03+00:00): Spitze!  :)
eggie (2026-07-19 22:36:34+00:00): Top!
Veel plezier met mappen verder. Er is genoeg te doen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-20 06:39:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback.. Het lijkt me niet correct. Je kunt toch vanuit het oosten niet rechtsaf.. alleen rechtdoor.
Wat is het probleem?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-20 06:41:33+00:00): reverted by changeset #186041936
eggie (2026-07-20 06:40:49+00:00): reverted by changeset #186041912
eggie (2026-07-20 07:35:47+00:00): en dan zeker niet left left right

Kijk vooral naar de pijlen op het wegdek. 
Die is leidend. 
MVG
eggie
MeesKeijser (2026-07-20 17:50:28+00:00): Goedenavond Eggie,

Ik ben het op zich met je eens. Echter, als je kijkt naar hoe de weg is ontworpen valt op dat de 2 oorspronkelijke rijstroken doorlopen en afbuigen naar links (het begin van de A18). Als je "rechtdoor" wil blijven gaan (via de N18 richting de Doetinchemseweg) dan moet je uitvoegen via de uitvoegstrook aan de rechterzijde.

Ondanks dat de pijlen aangeven dat je rechtdoor gaat op de rechter strook (en dat de pijlen aangeven dat je linksaf gaat op de linker 2 stroken), is de rechterstrook eigenlijk een afslag naar rechts.

Op dit moment staat dit volgens mij niet duidelijk genoeg in OpenStreetMap en dat heeft als gevolg dat sommige navigatie apps verkeerde instructies geven. Namelijk dat je de weg moet blijven volgen, terwijl de instructie moet zijn: rechts aanhouden
eggie (2026-07-20 17:59:29+00:00): Hoi... Kan je afweging begrijpen.  Denk toch dat we ons aan de conventie van OSM moeten houden gezien de pijlen op in de rijstroken.
Je kunt contact opnemen met een van de voorgaande inframappers Jeroen van der Gun. Die zijn beroepsmatig bezig met die rijstrookbegeleiding. In dit geval ook. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JeroenvanderGun

Je zou ook je advies kunnen vragen op het forum van OSM.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43

Voorlopig houd ik me liever aan de manier van taggen binnen OSM met valideren..
De instructies die je anders krijgt bij de rijstrookbegeleiding kloppen anders niet met de pijlen op het wegdek. 
Ben benieuw hoe ervaren forumleden het zien.
MVG
eggie
felipeeugenio (2026-07-22 20:50:17+00:00): Estimado. No sé qué trató de hacer, pero requirió de 3 maperos repararlo. Rompió toda la línea de costa y movió relaciones sin entender mucho lo que estaba haciendo. por favor un poco mas de recato en las ediciones si recién está comenzando.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186030403
assanges (2026-07-20 08:05:41+00:00): muito obrigado!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186030465
eggie (2026-07-20 07:29:56+00:00): Tag McVanish

Das hier hat nicht mit "Persoonlijke naamgeving' zu tun.
In Deutschland auch auf English taggen oder Deutsch.
Guck mal im Wiki.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hazard
...hazard habe Ich gelöscht. 

Grüß,
eggie
eggie (2026-07-20 07:31:53+00:00): incline=20% ist schon in OSM hinzugefügt. 
Das reicht.
alpacaMaps (2026-07-19 23:34:02+00:00): You are continuing to add nodes stacked atop one another and nodes out in fields where they wouldn't be.

All of your nodes have been proven to be falsely reported.

PLEASE STOP.
alpacaMaps (2026-07-19 23:34:01+00:00): You are continuing to add nodes stacked atop one another and nodes out in fields where they wouldn't be.

All of your nodes have been proven to be falsely reported.

PLEASE STOP.
alpacaMaps (2026-07-19 23:34:00+00:00): You are continuing to add nodes stacked atop one another and nodes out in fields where they wouldn't be.

All of your nodes have been proven to be falsely reported.

PLEASE STOP.
alpacaMaps (2026-07-19 23:33:59+00:00): You are continuing to add nodes stacked atop one another and nodes out in fields where they wouldn't be.

All of your nodes have been proven to be falsely reported.

PLEASE STOP.
alpacaMaps (2026-07-19 23:33:58+00:00): You are continuing to add nodes stacked atop one another and nodes out in fields where they wouldn't be.

All of your nodes have been proven to be falsely reported.

PLEASE STOP.
alpacaMaps (2026-07-19 23:33:57+00:00): You are continuing to add nodes stacked atop one another and nodes out in fields where they wouldn't be.

All of your nodes have been proven to be falsely reported.

PLEASE STOP.
alpacaMaps (2026-07-19 23:33:56+00:00): You are continuing to add nodes stacked atop one another and nodes out in fields where they wouldn't be.

All of your nodes have been proven to be falsely reported.

PLEASE STOP.
alpacaMaps (2026-07-19 23:33:55+00:00): You are continuing to add nodes stacked atop one another and nodes out in fields where they wouldn't be.

All of your nodes have been proven to be falsely reported.

PLEASE STOP.
alpacaMaps (2026-07-19 23:33:54+00:00): You are continuing to add nodes stacked atop one another and nodes out in fields where they wouldn't be.

All of your nodes have been proven to be falsely reported.

PLEASE STOP.
alpacaMaps (2026-07-19 23:33:53+00:00): You are continuing to add nodes stacked atop one another and nodes out in fields where they wouldn't be.

All of your nodes have been proven to be falsely reported.

PLEASE STOP.
eggie (2026-07-20 06:36:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  lanes= (rijstroken)  kun je beter niet gebruiken voor die woonstraten.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
rajdhani (2026-07-20 11:51:10+00:00): Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186055555
muralito (2026-07-20 12:46:07+00:00): Hi. This mass edit should have been discussed previously, as it introduces a few mistakes, e.g. closed sites, short numbers that cannot be called with int. format +598, etc.
geomaster01 (2026-07-20 14:32:18+00:00): Hi, thanks for the feedback.

The goal of this mass edit was only to standardize the formatting of the phone numbers. I used a bot to assist with the formatting, but I still reviewed each change manually to make sure the visible formatting looked correct. The intention was not to verify whether the numbers or websites are still active.

I understand that some entries may still have issues, such as closed sites or numbers that should not be converted to the international format. I see those as a separate maintenance task that would require checking the current validity of the data, rather than just its formatting. If the community thinks that kind of verification should be done first or together with formatting changes, I'm happy to discuss that approach before making further edits.
justynabu (2026-07-20 09:14:50+00:00): Ten zestaw zmian zepsuł dane, proszę o pilne wycofanie. Błąd dobrze widać tu: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186031618
Marek-M (2026-07-20 09:48:38+00:00): Błędne przesunięcie całej drogi poprawiłem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186049888 - chyba to wystarczy jako naprawa.
BikeBarian (2026-07-20 12:10:38+00:00): Panowie, jeśli coś przypadkiem przesunałem w sensie cała drogę to sorki, późno było i mogłem gdzies przez przypadek namieszać. Dla tej drogi o której pisze MarekM zmieniłem tylko rodzaj bo będąc tam wczoraj to tam w zasadzie nie ma już drogi tylko zarośnięte wszystko jest więc wprowadzało to w błąd. Ciezko było tam chodzi a jazda rowerem to tylko na elektryku. Droga tam kiedys była...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186031618
Supaplex (2026-07-20 03:13:02+00:00): Hi Flowerchild@1

We received a report you are using customized editor to upload many surveillance equipment, which do not exist.

We will block you for continuing editing and please follow the discuss and response to the inquires: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=24285569

If you have anything to say, email to data@osmfoundaton.org with the subject with “Ticket#2026072010000169”

Dennis Raylin Chen, Data Working Group, OpenStreetMap Foundation

data@osmfoundation.org [Ticket#2026072010000169]
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186031864
Krystek (2026-07-23 12:00:45+00:00): Don't remove duplicate phone numbers from POIs. Identical numbers in phone and contact:phone (or mobile and contact:mobile) tag is not an error. Please read this - https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/using-both-phone-and-contact-phone-on-the-same-object-is-that-an-error/137765
eerib (2026-07-20 05:09:29+00:00): Reverted for vandalism. New sockpuppet account of a previously banned vandal related to on-going mountain bike trail related vandalism in this area.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186039454
vector_voyager (2026-07-20 14:50:42+00:00): I don't know what sock puppets have to do with this, but clearly you don't live here or have ever seen the "trail". 
Please refrain from adding nefarious and incorrect information to OSM, it's supposed to be a source of truth, build by people on the ground who have actually seen and visited these places.  I have seen it with my own 2 eyes, what evidence do you have to the contrary?
eerib (2026-07-20 16:50:03+00:00): Creating multiple accounts in an effort to vandalize OpenStreetMap data is unacceptable.

If you would like to explain yourself, you can do so by emailing the Data Working Group, the designated moderation group of OpenStreetMap.

data@openstreetmap.org
vector_voyager (2026-07-20 16:59:13+00:00): I'm not sure why you keep referring to multiple accounts, but you are completely mistaken about my identity. I am simply a local contributor mapping what I have physically verified on the ground.

Let’s please address the actual map data: why do you keep insisting this trail is here? The trail you are reinstating does not exist in reality. If you have GPS traces, recent imagery, or local knowledge to prove otherwise, please share it so we can collaborate. Since we are at an impasse, I will take your advice and contact the Data Working Group so they can review the evidence and correct this mapping error.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-20 17:27:53+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Business POIs added to the map must be visitable physical locations that are verifiable on the ground. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted towing SEO spam POI with malformed tags in an office park, with no apparent verifiable location on the ground, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186073633
pwbriggs (2026-07-20 03:13:19+00:00): Roads shouldn't be deleted just because they're private. You may find some sections of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property useful.

That said, based on aerial imagery from recent years, it looks like, along with the destruction of the building that was here, the road got overgrown with grass to some degree.

Is the road still currently present on the ground? If so, I can help you apply the correct tags to this doesn't get added back incorrectly by another mapper. If the road is gone on-the-ground, deleting it is okay (albeit potentially confusing to other mappers).

Thanks!
OllieR0b (2026-07-20 03:29:51+00:00): House burned down over three years ago and property is totally overgrown so considered it no longer there.
pwbriggs (2026-07-20 03:33:09+00:00): Thanks for confirming.
Wildsharky (2026-07-22 12:15:14+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186111237
Wildsharky (2026-07-22 12:14:20+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186110711
Udarian (2026-07-20 02:50:59+00:00): While ref's can have characters in them a ref is not supposed to be the name of the bus system (not Coral Gables Trolley), ref refers to an unique identifier given to an object, for an example see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1039700670 and https://api.panoramax.xyz/en/index?focus=pic&map=19.9/25.6798389/-80.3681972&pic=11dc3e52-81cc-45c8-a4d5-a2fa58139236&seq=9a38a181-0d50-40b6-b98f-f6d45399ae00&speed=250&theme=default&users=default&xyz=359.00/0.00/30 which is an image of the above linked bus stop. for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref .

Happy mapping,
Udar.
lalgonzales (2026-07-20 19:43:34+00:00): Hola, estimada. Noté tus ediciones en una task del Mapatón y quería consultarte si las estás realizando dentro del marco del proyecto o como una colaboración personal. Te pregunto porque, para asegurar la utilidad de la data, es más adecuado dibujar la huella del edificio en lugar de marcar únicamente su posible ubicación. Cuando solo se señala el area asi, puede generar errores en los análisis posteriores.

Aprecio mucho tu aporte y, si necesitas cualquier aclaración, estoy completamente a la orden.
wireguy (2026-07-21 22:20:39+00:00): Garret, phone for Penn Murry bar was text (miss-paste?).  I updated the phone, web, and hours.  Keep mapping!
MappingMore (2026-07-22 10:06:22+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186168490
FajrAl (2026-07-22 10:56:39+00:00): Bing is outdated in this region, you should use Esri
FajrAl (2026-07-21 07:31:29+00:00): It seems my feedback wasn't taken into account
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-20 17:32:23+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other mistagging for POI in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186074010
felipeeugenio (2026-07-20 14:02:33+00:00): Hola. Esto es el mapa. No tenemos información de dónde viven las personas. La ubicación que te da MP está dada por tu ISP.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186038048
ajmat (2026-07-22 04:59:05+00:00): Partially Reverted in https://osmcha.org/changesets/186038169
Wildsharky (2026-07-22 12:13:44+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186108915
MappingMore (2026-07-22 05:20:51+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186156216
vlakos555 (2026-07-21 06:52:44+00:00): dakujem za opravu
b-jazz (2026-07-28 16:24:23+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1380488199

You have made a common error when you saw a fairway that looked like it didn't have a proper "Feature Type" defined and decided to add the fairway tag. The hole was already properly tagged, but was part of a relation of multiple objects known as a multipolygon. Please read this short wiki page where I've tried to explain what you are looking at and avoid making the mistake in the future. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID_understanding_golf_course_relations 

Thanks.
czebureks (2026-07-20 12:41:33+00:00): Cześć, relacja wielokąta złożonego jest moim zdaniem niezbędna, jeżeli "Jankowski Las" jest jedną inwestycją z tymi samymi właściwościami, ale bez ciągłości terytorialnej. W przeciwnym wypadku, mamy duplikat
Marek-M (2026-07-20 13:23:16+00:00): Usuwałem tutaj relację osiedla symetria. Relacja Janowski las może została usunięta wcześniej, ja tylko korygowałem geometrię.
czebureks (2026-07-21 13:17:27+00:00): Ok, dzięki za wyjaśnienie