piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-17 07:40:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9781304721
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9781304723
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9781304724
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9781304725
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9781304726
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9781304728
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9781304729
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10672546689
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10672546690
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10672546691
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10672546692
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10672546693
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10672546694
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10672546695

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
dcapillae (2023-02-17 08:51:20+00:00): Buenos días.

¿De dónde proviene ese nombre? Vivo en la zona y no tengo constancia de que ese collado tenga nombre alguno.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
dcapillae (2023-02-17 08:53:12+00:00): Veo que se dedica a nombrar objetos aleatoriamente con el nombre «Tincsy». Por favor, deje de hacerlo.
dcapillae (2023-02-17 08:54:29+00:00): Este conjunto de cambios fue revertido.
gscholz (2023-02-28 08:09:57+00:00): Hi william bonya_ImportAccount,
your recent import activities have created several errors in the OSM database regarding not connected ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=34.37834&lat=-1.45876&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132662160

As you may know, those kind of ways cannot be used by routing software. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Samwel Kyando_Import Account (2023-03-02 08:50:03+00:00): fixed
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-02-17 19:37:41+00:00): Hi, there are some imports by Asumarin where pharmacies overrode shops and amenities. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88550788
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90342150

In this import it's easy to see that at least Põhja Rimi Apteek is also a shop. The pharmacy should be extracted (there is already a node for it) and shop's tags returned.

It would be nice if you'd fix this and at least review what you're importing, implement an automated check for this and retroactively check your older imports too.
dgmapping (2023-03-03 13:55:54+00:00): Please make sure not add duplicate pharmacies! For example "Tartu Sõbra Apteek" was already in OSM as a way: 278982491

Currently I deleted the node 7755823575 for this pharmacy.
felipeeugenio (2023-02-17 11:22:07+00:00): Hola
una pregunta y un comentario:
1) Cuál es la fuente de los nombres que cambias? Si acaso alguna calle cambió de nombre, por favor dejar el nombre antiguo con el tag old_name=
2) cuando agregue un semáforo o cualquier otro tipo de señalética en una calle que es de dos sentidos, por favor agregar también la dirección del sentido afectado (direction=forward/backward)

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132662211
Daemon Targaryen (2023-02-17 15:43:43+00:00): Hola, no es un cambio de nombre en sí, es una "precisión" de nombres que o están incompletos o escritos incorrectamente. La fuente es el plan regulador comunal y las señaléticas con nombre de calles
Saludos
felipeeugenio (2023-02-17 18:27:15+00:00): Ok. gracias por su tiempo.
jeslop (2023-02-17 10:42:54+00:00): Reverted on changeset  #132668850. Vandalism on map.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
CADdog63 (2023-02-17 08:31:30+00:00): Hallo,
ich halte deine Änderung für falsch.
Dieses Gebäude hat nicht diesen Namen, sondern in dem Gebäude befindet sich eine entsprechende Einrichtung. Bitte prüfe das mal.
TWeide (2023-02-17 08:55:52+00:00): Hallo,
danke für den Hinweis. Aber ich denke, das ist korrekt, denn das Objekt ist als Behörde deklariert und bei dieser handelt es sich um das Thüringer Landesamt ... .
stillhart (2023-02-25 14:57:37+00:00): Wow, danke. Vor zwei Wochen gab es Vandalismus (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132349284#map=17/52.39212/13.79241) an meinen Edits, obwohl meine aktuellere Aufgrund von Drohnenaufnahmen waren, und nun kommt dein fetter geiler Edit. Unglaublich geil.
Warst du vor Ort oder auf welche Quellen beziehst du dich? 

Anyway, ich würde langfristig einen Blick auf deine Änderungen werfen, da es bei der Gigafactory einen krassen drift-off zwischen den Satelitten Bildern und der Realität gibt.
skyper (2023-02-17 14:02:15+00:00): Hallo osmdees,
jetzt fängst Du ja doch nen edit war an. Schau Dir doch bitte mal die Historie dieses Knoten an und Du wirst feststellen, dass er die meiste Zeit eben mit Sankt im `name=` geführt wurde.
Auch sollten die Werte von `short_name` und `name` nicht identisch sein.
Grüße,
skyper
Jakka (2023-02-17 19:01:03+00:00): is this correct with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway%3Dreversible
Dimacn (2023-02-17 10:52:37+00:00): Здравствуйте. Скажите пожалуйста, вы раньше карты видели? Например Яндекс или 2ГИС?
gscholz (2023-02-21 07:42:44+00:00): Hi William Mponeja_ImportAccount,
obviously there have been some import activities in your region which resulted in several errors regarding not connected ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=34.43354&lat=-1.38043&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

As you may know, this kind of errors irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
eggie (2023-02-17 15:07:18+00:00): Hi databox.. I changed name= into operator.

Greetz,
eggie
gscholz (2023-02-24 07:06:45+00:00): Hi abebayehuz,
I have reverted this changeset to fix the errors discussed in your other contributions.

Please have a look at our documentation about how to handle gps tracks properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Convert_GPS_tracks

Guido
CapitaineMoustache (2023-03-02 15:18:02+00:00): Bonjour !
Je me suis permis d'annuler vos modifications sur le local commercial CB D'eau à Charlieu qui n'est plus occupé par l'agence immobilière Orpi.
Merci d'en prendre compte ! ;)
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2023-03-02 15:23:24+00:00): Bonjour,

Nous venons de recevoir une note aujourd'hui du réseau Orpi nous indiquant sa fermeture.
Nous ne diffuserons plus sur ce point de vente

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
AndersAndersson (2023-02-17 14:03:55+00:00): Hello!
Did the user really report that the house crosses the road?
The road is positioned correclty at that place. So the house is wrong.
miroslavuzice87 (2023-02-17 14:13:49+00:00): Hello, and thank you for getting in touch. Indeed house was drawn over a road, and even though the building was aligned with the Bing imagery it doesn't align with the road geometry that was drawn over some other imagery and the building does cross the road. Thank you for pointing this out, changeset is reverted. Happy mapping.
eggie (2023-02-17 15:04:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
gscholz (2023-02-24 07:06:40+00:00): Hi abebayehuz,
I have reverted this changeset to fix the errors discussed in your other contributions.

Please have a look at our documentation about how to handle gps tracks properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Convert_GPS_tracks

Guido
ali-14 (2023-02-20 06:49:55+00:00): سلام، روز بخیر
شما خیابان‌های دوطرفه رو بدون علت دولاین کردید و خط‌های یک طرفه را بدون اتصال رها کردید.
لطفا بدون اطلاع از قواعد ترسیم، ویرایش انجام ندهید.
🅢🅐🅜🅐🅝➤ (2023-02-20 06:52:45+00:00): 🤯🤯🤯
تغییراتی که در نقشه اعمال کردین مصداق خرابکاری است. لطفا بدون دانش کافی اقدام به اصلاح نقشه نکنید
Farshiid (2023-02-20 06:49:37+00:00): کاربر عزیز
لطفا بدون اطلاع و دانش کافی اقدام به ویرایش نقشه نکنید. اصلاح جهت هایی که شما انجام دادین، مصداق خرابکاری در نقشه است.
Frans S (2023-03-08 14:24:44+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please focus on buildings and roads mapping.
Landuse objects like orchards are not part of the project. These objects are not to be mapped through a task manager. They cover more land than the area of a single task.
About Buildings. Except for a single building you just map rectangular . despite a number of the buildings have extension or yard
Best regards and keep mapping
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-05 02:32:58+00:00): Thank you for mapping. It would be great if you could add readable changeset comments and also the land use mapping has a bit of spike. Consider mapping in the correct ways, please. Happy Mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132665823
GinaroZ (2023-02-19 17:03:04+00:00): What's the reason for the revert?
borovac (2023-02-19 17:22:58+00:00): I reverted adding these names in different languages to avoid any issues with literal translation it's best to leave it up to people with special or local knowledge to add these.
NieWnen (2023-02-18 10:14:23+00:00): Jakie jest tego źródło?
Jest na to dokumentacja, albo chociaż koncepcja?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-22 14:56:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146934445/history - są podstawy by sądzić że to realne plany?
Anas masuris (2025-05-22 15:32:49+00:00): Na szybko sprawdziłem w MPZP i jest jakaś projektowana droga. Przykład:

https://pobierz.grodzisk.pl/www/plan2/rys/88_375_2020_odrano-wola_malarska-barwna-lazurowa.pdf
Frans S (2023-02-25 15:28:23+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please solve the issues shown by the issue triangle. They need to be solved before you upload your mappings.
Refresh your knowledge how and where to tag highways.
See this wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways
Best regard
gscholz (2023-02-18 07:14:21+00:00): Hi abebayehuz,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=38.78637&lat=9.00126&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132666048

Obiously you have added gpx  tracks to osm wich do not have any meaning to the map itself.

Can you please fix this?

You can add gpx track as background information from your personal page:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/abebayehuz

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Upload_GPS_tracks#How_to_upload_a_GPS_trace

Kind regards
Guido
Frans S (2023-02-20 14:23:56+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
You mapped a trace of appr 4.5 mtr wide as a path. Paths are mostly as wide as max 2 mtr. Unclassified was a better decision here.
btw, you must have seen the unclassified highway on the same trace. Don't tag a trace twice please
Best regards
Frans S (2023-02-23 15:09:44+00:00): Hello. Another issue. Please do not cluster buildings and tag it as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually.
Best regards and keep mapping.
julcnx (2023-02-21 02:52:08+00:00): Hi. I changed the merged noexit=yes node to a barrier=gate. noexit=yes should be only used on disconnected road segments physically separated by wall/fence. Gates however should be used as nodes of existing road segments. More info: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-tag-noexit-yes-nodes/9095
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132666451
flohoff (2023-02-17 18:53:24+00:00): Moin
du hast hier ein "construction=yes" eingetragen - Damit ist die Straße bei einigen routing enginges Komplett auf dem Graphen gefallen. Das führt u.a. dazu das der Hof "Meyer zu Wrachtrup" nicht mehr erreichbar ist.

Was ist denn da genau der Zustand? Wird da nur gebaut und die Straße ist benutzbar? Oder ist die Gesperrt? Und wenn ja wie lange? 

Das mit dem construction=yes ist SEHR gefährlich. Es wird in der Karte nicht dargestellt und damit ist das für die anderen Mapper nicht sichtbar. Wenn du sowas einträgst am besten immer noch einen Note aufmachen und darin beschreiben wann das kontrolliert werden muss. Ggfs links zu Presseveröffentlichungen.

Flo
flohoff (2023-02-17 18:53:58+00:00): Beispielproblem für die Erreichbarkeit - Rot - Alte route - Grün neue Route. Und da das GAR NICHT mehr erreichbar ist wird nur "in die nähe" Navigiert.

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=406003,466810#51.97336,8.61742,16z
Frans S (2023-03-06 12:15:01+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132666526
Frans S (2023-03-06 12:15:05+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132666526
sanganh (2023-03-07 06:50:24+00:00): Hello Frans,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and providing your valuable suggestions.Going forward,I will ensure to be mindful. Thank you once again and looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
lalilnet
aceman444 (2024-05-18 16:49:24+00:00): Hi, yes, the bus ticket price has changed. But why are you removing the tags public_transport:version=2 ? Those were correct.
Tjuro_Global (2023-02-18 20:31:22+00:00): Hello,

I see that you have added some landuse=village_green, that is split up. Generally there should only be one landuse=village_green in an area.
Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dvillage_green

Greetings Tjuro
mol_an (2023-02-19 07:25:44+00:00): Hi Tjuro,
Thank you very much for your advise, good to learn about that.
ftcat (2023-02-17 14:04:42+00:00): Hi siphiwe444,

Thanks for adding to the map in the Lusaka area. Just one point, the lane count of the roads here are 2, one in each direction. A road with only 1 lane would be a road only wide enough to fit one vehicle. You are possibly thinking of carriageways i.e a dual carriageway may be in effect 2 separate roads of one lane each in either direction
ftcat (2023-02-17 14:18:00+00:00): Another thing to note is you should use 'Road' and 'Street' rather than 'Rd.' and 'St.'
Frans S (2023-03-08 14:36:15+00:00): Hello.
Please read the info about mapping of tracks in the instructions.
Sorry, but you waste time by mapping most of them
Best regard
Frans S (2023-02-17 11:29:56+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
In general, your mapping are rather accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Rectangular buildings, not always squared. Each building need to be squared with the Q key.
Retagged a landuse=residential to building, which is incorrect.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132667524
gnoorsye (2023-02-21 11:59:27+00:00): Hello Frans,
Thank you for reviewing our changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies for incorrect edits. Going forward, we will ensure to not repeat such errors again. Thanks once again for fixing the issue, looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
gnoorsye
Ropino (2023-02-18 10:05:24+00:00): Hallo,
welches Problem wurde mit der Änderung von "class=P3.3" in "highway=P3.3" behoben?
Was soll "highway=P3.3" bedeuten?
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
ETIEN59 (2023-02-19 07:48:41+00:00): Bonjour,

La partie concernée démarre du N°3 jusqu'au N° 34 de Grande Rue.
Un grand merci pour votre aide
Cordialement
Eti​enne Delobel
DaanLT (2023-02-17 11:14:37+00:00): labas, privažiavimo keliai yra driveway, ne residental
Alex Motarykin (2023-02-17 11:20:49+00:00): labas, supratau
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-17 12:15:03+00:00): jeśli są jeszcze różne warianty projektów to raczej za wcześnie by mapować w OSM
masuuuuuu (2023-02-17 14:42:18+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za uwagę. Rozumiem takie podejście, przedstawię też swoje. Zauważ, że wiele dróg istnieje w jako highway=proposed latami w OSM, również w kilku wariantach. Przykład to S12/S74 w okolicach Tomaszowa Mazowieckiego i Opoczna, mimo że dopiero niedawno dowiedzieliśmy się o oficjalnych planach połączenia węzła Łódź Południe z okolicami Opoczna. Inny przykład: S17 – wschodnia obwodnica Warszawy. Do jej realizacji, ze względu na zaskarżenie decyzji środowiskowych, daleka droga. Tymczasem na OSM są dwa warianty. Pierwsza wersja tej drogi jest sprzed siedmiu lat. I takim podejściem kierowałem się wrzucając Obwodnicę Aglomeracji Warszawskiej. Z czasem któryś wariant zostanie wybrany, będzie rozwijany w postaci projektu, wtedy będzie można modyfikować jego geometrię i tagi, równocześnie usuwać odrzucone warianty. Pozdrawiam, Maciek
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-25 10:10:56+00:00): A, jak są inne warianty w OSM to też jest to do skasowania

Jak ktoś nie chce sam usuwać - to dajcie linki
Frans S (2023-02-24 10:15:07+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping on this  task.
About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Please adjust wrong positioned buildings as well
This video shows how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
Gilles Godar (2023-02-17 16:04:46+00:00): Hi Habi, how are you ?
It seems that you closed my ticket but I don't see any changes: the top of mountain should be where the topo shows top of mountains, which is a bit below actual end of path.

Thank you.

Gilles
habi (2023-02-17 20:40:07+00:00): I misunderstood you; I aligned the *path* and moved it slightly to the south, which  you can see if you zoom in here: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132668659
habi (2023-02-17 20:46:21+00:00): It seems that the exact position of the peak https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5523504160 is not correct.

I moved it to the exact position of the 'x' on https://map.geo.admin.ch/?lang=en&topic=ech&bgLayer=ch.swisstopo.pixelkarte-farbe&layers=ch.swisstopo.zeitreihen,ch.bfs.gebaeude_wohnungs_register,ch.bav.haltestellen-oev,ch.swisstopo.swisstlm3d-wanderwege,ch.astra.wanderland-sperrungen_umleitungen&layers_opacity=1,1,1,0.8,0.8&layers_visibility=false,false,false,false,false&layers_timestamp=18641231,,,,&E=2577028.14&N=1158300.74&zoom=11.63192809488736
habi (2023-02-17 20:52:12+00:00): Move was done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132694292
Gilles Godar (2023-02-18 08:50:58+00:00): thank you, changes seems great on the other map. When will it be visible on this map ?
habi (2023-02-18 09:29:31+00:00): Once the tiles are rendered, you clean your cache and you reload them map.
It’s visible for me.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-18 07:56:19+00:00): Please do not change roadways to cartpaths.  Please elaborate on why you changed roadways into cartpaths even though they are clearly roadways?
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-18 07:56:45+00:00): Reverted in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132704973
Woazboat (2023-02-18 08:18:04+00:00): If you want these roads to show up as cart paths in your golf game, poke the maintainer of your import tool to take a look at https://github.com/chadrockey/TGC-Designer-Tools/issues/94 and merge the changes in https://github.com/chadrockey/TGC-Designer-Tools/pull/119 instead of incorrectly modifying OSM data
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-18 19:32:52+00:00): User=Woazboat - they are continuing to edit other roadways into cartpaths.  They have a lot of other edits that should probably be reviewed/reverted.
rarad74 (2023-02-22 15:43:07+00:00): Ma baitas, tu chiar iti bati jhoc de noi? Cine dracu te tot pune sa apropii lane-urile intre ele de aproape le-ai lipit? Il faci pe prostu sau ce dracu? Tu crezi ca avem timp sa reparam mizeriile tale cu mizeria ta de companie de taxi? De cand modifici tu impotriva regulilor de editare doar ca sa iti functioneze tie un gunoi de aplicatie de taxi?
Frans S (2023-02-17 10:51:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
This is a building and road mapping project.
No need to add/changed other features.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132669019
Uterouter (2023-02-17 22:23:38+00:00): Привет. На будущее: подъездные дороги, проезды между домами, переулки, парковочные дороги рисуются типом "Служебные дороги". Не типом "Улица". Улица это сквозная дорога обычно идущая вокруг домов.
Uterouter (2023-02-17 23:03:08+00:00): Будет полезно почитать:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dservice
hoancat (2023-02-20 10:17:56+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai corrigé certaines de vos erreurs :
- Les piscines privées doivent être renseignées avec le tag access=private.
- Vous aviez connecté le bout d'un chemin à une limite administrative.
- Le barbecue est dans une maison privée et n'a donc pas d'intérêt à être ajouté à la base de données, idem pour le panneau solaire.
Cordialement,
Hoancat
hoancat (2023-02-20 10:36:39+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai ajouté le tag access=private pour la piscine que vous avez rajoutée.
Je voudrais savoir pourquoi avez-vous appelé une maison "Maison Pottier" ? Est-ce un commerce ou un lieu d'intérêt public ? Dans le doute, j'ai enlevé ce nom que je n'ai trouvé nulle part.
Cordialement,
Hoancat
gurglypipe (2023-02-17 12:36:50+00:00): Why revert this?
borovac (2023-02-17 12:49:15+00:00): I reverted adding these names in different languages to avoid any issues with literal translation it's best to leave it up to people with special or local knowledge to add these.