piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nevw (2024-05-11 02:36:18+00:00): This Microsoft Map builder has split a section of residential road and renamed it to a nearby address.
nevw (2024-05-11 02:49:59+00:00): Also, the section of road renamed as “ inala place narrabeen” in nowhere near where mapped on Jubilee Avenue, Mona Vale
nevw (2024-05-11 02:54:50+00:00): This vandalism has been reverted in changeset 151169451
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-11 02:57:19+00:00): added US 69 North members
Warin61 (2026-02-28 00:05:10+00:00): Errr No.

Multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments. 

In principle the surface parking would be part of the mall too. 

I'd put a simple way around the hole outside of the block and put the tags on that .. depending on the OSM definition of 'mall'? 
Alternative? Put a simple way around the outside of all of the buildings and tags on that. 

Thoughts?
❤️‍🔥 (2026-03-02 11:53:19+00:00): whoops, yeah this was totally broken. changed to a simple multipolygon: relation/17558978
NeisBot (2024-05-11 04:05:53+00:00): Hi TeamRocket54321, welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1094363413

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
user_18023081 (2024-05-11 12:00:05+00:00): Niantic updates OSM data every few months, so your vandalism is pointless
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-11 12:36:23+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151172643
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-11 04:03:59+00:00): Obrigado por mapear. O mapeamento está ótimo e também o comentário do conjunto de alterações. Feliz mapeamento! #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151169731
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-11 04:00:58+00:00): Impressive, Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment.  Thanks for providing the brief context as well. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151169817
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-11 03:56:14+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great with the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151169825
NeisBot (2024-05-11 04:10:10+00:00): Hi RaptorHunter, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/way/1281883815
https://osm.org/way/1281883814
https://osm.org/way/1281883813
https://osm.org/way/1281883822
https://osm.org/way/1281883820
https://osm.org/way/1281883819
https://osm.org/way/1281883818
https://osm.org/way/1281883817
https://osm.org/way/1281883816

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
RaptorHunter (2024-05-11 04:16:43+00:00): Yeah, usually I just map the obvious sand/gravel beaches alongside the riverbeds. The source is the bing aerial view
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-11 04:21:42+00:00): Thanks for your answer.

#HappyMapping
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
emersonveenstra (2024-05-21 12:29:36+00:00): Hi there,

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8772130 you added oneway=yes but it also has lanes:backward and lanes:forward. Could you double check the tagging? Thanks!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
silversurfer83 (2024-05-11 11:33:20+00:00): Danke
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151171011
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
ablevi202 (2024-05-11 05:25:22+00:00): this broke highway 25s route relation, ill fix it
ablevi202 (2024-05-11 06:22:14+00:00): did all of them in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151171941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
impiaaa (2024-05-12 02:04:05+00:00): USPS says the zip code was correct already (and they're the authority): https://tools.usps.com/zip-code-lookup.htm?byaddress
Black_Diamond (2024-05-12 03:08:47+00:00): Well that’s awkward. The Safeway website is wrong. Though it is the correct zip code for next door. I’ll change it to 95128-4320. That also matches the property records too.
bxl-forever (2024-05-11 09:01:40+00:00): Hello,

Next time you change two places far apart from each other, it is better to upload them separately (i.e. change the first clinic, upload, and only then move the map to the other location to work on the other one).
This is because your edit generated a large bounding box covering about a third of the Netherlands and Belgium.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Have a nice day.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:10:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-11 06:10:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11896344472

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-11 06:40:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"ks. Stanisława Brzóski":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499286275
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499288035
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499289545

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
VLD549 (2024-05-24 07:06:38+00:00): Hi, could you explain the name change  from Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis - locatie Zaltbommel Kerkstraat to Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis - Locatie Zaltbommel Kerkstraat?
On the site 'locatie' is written with lower case.

Thank you
eggie (2024-05-24 08:25:53+00:00): Timo,
Er staan meer vragen open 
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=19411677
mvg
eggie
VLD549 (2024-07-22 14:43:02+00:00): Thank you eggie for stepping in. Should we leave it now as per the suggestion of Timo?

Thank you.
eggie (2024-07-22 14:53:07+00:00): Hi .. this is the name on the website anyway 😀

Greetz..
eggie
literan (2024-05-14 17:05:45+00:00): не надо рисовать давно снесенные здания. Видно же на Esri, что его нет уже
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-08 13:42:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10979393516/history

- you are entirely free to start using a new tag! If apartment:name fits, then just start using it!

see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=ATYL

and if it is name/code of entrance... then maybe simply use name or ref tag?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-11 07:20:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2367857148
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2367857140
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2367857132
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2367857124
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2367857117
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2367857110
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2367857102
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2367857093
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2367857084
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2367857077
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2367857070
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2367857058
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2367857050
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2367857043
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2367857036
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2367857027
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1281897472
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1281897473
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1281897474
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228151686
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228151691
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228151697
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1281897469
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228151700
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228151705
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228135231
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228135237
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228135263
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1281897467
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1281897468
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1281897470
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1281897471

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
gurglypipe (2024-05-11 08:12:03+00:00): Hi, if deleting shops or amenities, please don’t fully delete the node. Doing so loses the address data, which will be useful if the shop reopens as something else. Instead, please add a lifecycle prefix (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix) to the shop= or amenity= tag and change name= to old_name=.

e.g. disused:amenity=clinic old_name=Bio Med Clinic

Thanks
gurglypipe (2024-05-11 08:15:06+00:00): I’ve made those changes as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151174639
Patrick Cherry (2024-05-13 08:24:50+00:00): Sorry about that!  TIL :)
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-27 07:02:20+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151173586
borovac (2024-05-21 21:42:38+00:00): Hi kentact,

Could you please explain why you use the tag “destination:lang:sr” and other variants? When we look at the wiki page for that tag, we see that it is abandoned and not in use (see here).

I’m curious if you contacted the community before adding those characters en masse, as I don’t see any discussion about it anywhere. The official forum for OpenStreetMap in Serbia can be found here.

I kindly request that you start a topic related to this issue on the official channel. Until a consensus is reached regarding adding the “destination:lang:*” tag, I recommend temporarily stopping further additions. Otherwise, I will write a complaint to DWG regarding this matter.

These decisions should be made collectively within the community, rather than by an individual setting rules unilaterally.

I saw that you added to 2257 relations. I would like to ask you once again to stop adding until you have agreed and received approval from the OSM Serbia community.

All best borovac
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-12 04:52:00+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151174221
Yurikson (2024-05-12 22:27:21+00:00): Thanks you for your feedback!
Arslan Farooq (2024-05-11 08:15:28+00:00): That's the correct location next the the small street. The bank is facing towards A K Fazlul Huq Road; not Jinnah Avenue.
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-12 13:22:26+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151174833
JackNUMBER (2024-05-12 20:55:34+00:00): Hello, il y a une curieuse ligne sans tag sur la commune de St-Maur-des-Fossés dans ce changeset :
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=2.50637&lat=48.80245&zoom=16
TT84 (2024-05-11 08:34:52+00:00): Correction: trajectory moved moved 200 east to new paved path.
marc__marc (2024-09-15 15:59:43+00:00): Hello,
where does the node network ref=92 and 93 are ? I have restored node network relation in the mean time
it seems wrong to delete this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136165365 https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4230307
Regards,
Marc
TT84 (2024-09-17 15:56:46+00:00): Hello Marc,
They have been moved to the new path that "de Vlaamse Waterweg" has made, +-300m to the east.
The old path has been overtaken by agriculture.
NeisBot (2024-05-11 08:45:14+00:00): Hi peppigno, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1281906998

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
ivanbranco (2024-05-11 10:18:52+00:00): Ciao peppigno, ho annullato questa modifica. Sei pregato di non inserire elementi di finzione nel database. Se hai intenzione di contribuire seriamente d'ora in poi, puoi cominciare a dare un'occhiata a questa pagina: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-11 11:06:20+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151179236

Thanks @ ivanbranco !
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601