piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
andrewsuzuki (2023-09-17 00:19:41+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding sidewalks. It would be best however if you could add a separate way for the crossings and tag them as footway=crossing, instead of having a continuous footway=sidewalk. Thanks!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dcrossing
VictorIE (2024-08-07 19:00:05+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1203393571
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1203393575

Should these sections be lanes=1 ?
MacLondon (2024-08-10 01:55:34+00:00): Well, there are no actual lanes (including cycle lanes) at these 2 crossing points.
jnighan (2023-09-12 14:37:56+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding these roads. They should be tagged as highway=service rather than highway=unclassified. Read more about OSM Connecticut highway classification here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Connecticut/Highway_classification
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-30 03:59:11+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140567255
user_20153556 (2023-09-01 18:07:20+00:00): lol did fizzie just revert his own revert?
what is the point of that?
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-30 05:01:11+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140568549
adiatmad (2023-08-30 05:36:32+00:00): I was sort of thinking, like, is "XX" really just the name? Can you give it another look? Thanks

>> https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1203396472
>> https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/396787048
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140567492
(Inactive) hairyhaggis_kaart (2023-08-30 12:45:49+00:00): Hi adiatmad. Thanks for pointing this out to us. The rest of the name has been added, we checked the surrounding area too.  Happy Mapping!
joost schouppe (2023-12-31 16:40:32+00:00): Hi Iresha,
Please don't add #'s in the names and tags etc. That's just confusing. Also if you don't know the name of the hotel, just leave it blank instead of repeating the description. The name is just for what a place is called.
jmarchon (2023-08-30 05:28:25+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!
What exactly is this? It looks like you forgot to add a top level tag which describes what kind of object this is.
Also, is this a public location? If not, then we would generally advise against adding it to OSM.

Have a nice day,
jmarchon
jmarchon (2023-09-02 22:50:39+00:00): I've gone ahead and added a top level tag. Feel free to let me know if it's wrong.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-10-05 09:30:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16256055 is this a no_left_turn or no_u_turn? Could you help check again?
user_5359 (2023-08-30 07:26:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-09-30 00:07:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 141933907 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fantasy mapping in Northern Cyprus
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-30 05:10:15+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11155286466

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
tonyf1 (2023-08-31 10:01:38+00:00): Hi. You have not responded to my requests 7 days ago and 4 days ago that you leave unique and meaningful changeset comments.
eggie (2023-08-30 05:32:50+00:00): Hi OSmapper..

Please comment you edits properly..
Decrease your edit area.

Why do you think so many subject are wrong in the Netherlands?
Not every warning was a wong edit.
Please be more careful. 
Greetz,
eggie
OStreetMapper (2023-08-30 05:37:30+00:00): A lot of them were, though.
Also, that's a good point. Didn't realize I was editing such a large area.
7tonin (2023-09-12 13:58:27+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai tenté d'emprunter ce chemin dimanche dernier. Arrivé par le bas, je n'ai pas vu le gué et ai suivi le ruisseau à sec. Au bout d'un moment je suis allé dans la prairie rive droite et ai retrouvé les vestiges ténus de ce chemin... ouf !
frelef (2023-09-13 06:14:25+00:00): Salut 7tonin, j'ai pas le temps tout de suite de voir tout ça de près mais j'abandonne pas le morceau. J'ai tracé parce que je connais bien le terrain mais je dois reconnaître qu'entre le chemin de St Cirgues vers Guipal & le gué, c'est pas toujours de la tarte. Je m'y remets dès que possible. Le plus simple sera sans doute de débroussailler sur place...
À +
rhtb0 (2023-08-30 13:16:24+00:00): Do not edit to change the status of these islands or revert edits doing so without first contacting the Data Working Group.
rhtb0 (2023-08-30 13:16:31+00:00): The effective control is in Korea
rhtb0 (2023-08-30 13:11:30+00:00): Do you know On the Ground Rule?
Map what's on the ground
Edit
Sometimes there's conflicting information about, say, the name of a place. An old map might call it one thing, current maps another, and the place name sign something else. People using our maps (for navigation) won't care about the spelling in other maps, they need to find the names on local signs on the map and vice versa. The only exception to this could be obvious misspellings on signs like John-F.-Kennwdy Square. Assuming that people would intuitively look for the correct spelling, perhaps not even noticing the wrongly spelt name at all, it makes sense to correct these. 


See
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes#On_the_Ground_Rule
rhtb0 (2023-08-30 13:12:26+00:00): Do you know that Japanese people cannot visit this island?
silversurfer83 (2023-08-30 07:02:18+00:00): Hi :)

die beiden hier bearbeiteten Flächen: Was befindet sich denn dort?
Laut den Eigenschaften, die vor der Bearbeitung dort eingetragen waren war die nördliche Fläche eine Außenbestuhlung und die südliche ein Parkplatz.
Jetzt sind beides erstmal nur noch Flächen...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140569906
SekeRob (2023-09-02 09:18:56+00:00): Hi,

Please be aware of this revert made by a now deleted account.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140693054
Jordi MF (2023-08-30 09:01:17+00:00): Hola migomo,

En OSM, la etiqueta "name" debe tener nombres verificables. Por ejemplo, deben formar parte de la toponimia oficial del IGN, de la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua, o que haya algún cartel de una institución que indique ese nombre. En este caso, "Alternativa morró" parece ser un nombre descri`tivo, lo cual no es correcto. Por eso, no debería usarse.

Saludos,
Jordi
Jordi MF (2023-08-30 09:03:53+00:00): Por otra parte,

En la ortofoto no puede verse demasiado bien la senda, por lo que la he marcado con mala visibilidad. Tampoco entiendo por qué has añadido la etiqueta "access=unknown". ¿No sabes si la senda es accesible? En este caso, no debería añadirse la senda si no se ha comprobado su existencia.

Quedo a la espera de tu comentario. Saludos,
Jordi
silversurfer83 (2023-08-30 06:59:24+00:00): Moin :)
Aus dem ganzen Gelände ein "building=yes" zu machen halte ich für gewagt.
Ich hätte da einen Vorschlag: Das Gelände wieder so taggen, wie es vorher war und an der Stelle, wo das Büro liegt gerne einen neuen Punkt erzeugen und den als Büro kennzeichnen.

Bei Fragen, immer raus damit

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140570762
JAAS (2023-09-11 03:08:58+00:00): Hola dfmapas.

Agradezco su colaboración editando el mapa, sin embargo le comento que las vías que ahora ha cambiado a ‘motorway’ (VAS y parte al sur de la Autopista Palin - Escuintla), contrario a lo que quisiéramos hubiera en realidad, no tienen esa clasificación. La realidad es que en OSM los ‘motorway’ son el único tipo de vía que se define por sus atributos físicos. Ninguna de estas carreteras gozan de las características físicas, por lo que son en realidad ‘trunk’ y en el caso de la VAS se le, puede agregar ‘motorroad’, lo que implica ser CASI un ‘motorway’, pero por sus atributos no lo es.

Saludos cordiales,
Jorge Aguirre
JAAS
JassKurn (2023-08-30 14:09:06+00:00): Hi,

In this changeset and the previous one, you added objects and tagged them as chimneys. They are not what OpenStreetMap defines as chimneys (removal of smoke/gases)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man%20made=chimney

They are Ventilation Shafts (create flow of air in a space such as a mine or tunnel)

The lack of connection in the Wiki pages are not helpful. So I'll make a change.
hofoen (2023-08-30 16:24:41+00:00): Thanks for advice, I fixed 3 of my edits. BR
Joseph R P (2023-09-03 16:13:45+00:00): What on Earth did you do here? Why did you change freeway ramps to tertiary links and various roads to primary? I am reverting these changesets. Please inform yourself of how road classification on OSM works before you reclassify any more roads.
colemanerik (2023-09-05 00:57:38+00:00): Maybe Primary wasn't right for all of them but they were all tertiary before I touched them.
Joseph R P (2023-09-05 23:04:11+00:00): Primary highway classification is reserved for major arterial roads or highways that connect other significant population centers. Secondary at highest is what I would classify some of these roads, but a lot of very minor roads like dead-end streets were tagged as primary so I was caught off-guard and confused. It's good to observe the surrounding area to see how everything else is classified or read into what you're working with before changing the classification of roads, as how roads are classified on the map can affect the routing of OSM-based navigation systems or simply be a rendering eyesore.
Joseph R P (2023-09-05 23:08:48+00:00): Aside from that, I'm wondering as to how the motorway links were changed to tertiary links. The link roads should correspond with the roads (or road of highest classification) that they connect to. The I 275/SR 32 ramps should remain motorway links in this case since they link to motorways rather than tertiary roads. Apologies if I came off as harsh at first, I was surprised to see all the roads in such a localized section be all tagged as primary and to have some of the things I worked on broken, as it does take a while to fix things since reverting edits can create several errors.
colemanerik (2023-09-06 03:03:02+00:00): As I have lived here all my life, I guess I consider some of these roads a more primary as they are used as the main arteries in the area for everybody. Using the English way of marking roads just doesn't really work for the US style of road systems.
Jakka (2023-09-01 12:00:15+00:00): très étrange que farmland a un nom ?
HopHopHop j'ai enlever.
Filip009 (2024-09-28 13:23:43+00:00): Why bilingual name, when only 1% is in Poland? There is also name:pl.
Johlo6 (2024-10-07 07:32:22+00:00): name = "Oravská priehrada - zbiornik Orawski"  je nesprávne;
je to obsiahnuté v name:pl

Prečo vymýšľať dvojjazyčné názvy tam, kde to nie je treba?
Filip009 (2024-10-07 07:37:16+00:00): No lebo malý kúsok zasahuje do Poľska. Ale tiež si myslím, že je to tu blbosť.
Jay May (2024-10-07 08:17:36+00:00): 1% is not 0% ;)
Filip009 (2024-10-07 08:47:46+00:00): Okay, we can split it right at the border and you can add polish name to that 1%.
Jay May (2024-10-07 09:33:29+00:00): The usual rule is: multilingual rule as long as any lake, sea etc. touches another country. I see no point and no harm in leaving as it is ............
Johlo6 (2024-10-07 13:51:53+00:00): Nuž, neviem, či v tomto prípade má význam oháňať sa všeobecným pravidlom. Otázka skôr znie, či to má nejaký zmysel, že je to takto po novom. Vyzerá to prinajmenšom čudne a nelogicky. Myslím, že aj pri dodržiavaní novovzniknutých, ale vlastne všetkých pravidiel treba zachovať zdravý sedliacky rozum. 

(Nájde sa okrem autora zmeny ešte niekto, komu by tam ten poľský názov chýbal?)
MiroJanosik (2024-10-07 15:32:01+00:00): I was looking for good practices on the wiki, on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Shared_boundary_features (about objects on country boundaries) there it says:

set name=* to both names, separated by a forward slash with spaces in between

For the Rhine river, this would be:
    name=Le Rhin / Rhein
    name:fr=Le Rhin
    name:de=Rhein

So I would suggest "Oravská priehrada / zbiornik Orawski"
MiroJanosik (2024-10-07 15:33:56+00:00): >> (Nájde sa okrem autora zmeny ešte niekto, komu by tam ten poľský názov chýbal?)
>> translation: "Is there someone besides author who would be missing Polish name there?"

That probably depends on how many discussion participants do you attract from Slovakia/Poland.
aceman444 (2024-10-07 20:12:18+00:00): You even forgot to add name:sk tag, so you are not following "rules".
Jay May (2024-10-07 20:19:00+00:00): That is my point from the very beginning:
name=Oravská priehrada / zbiornik Orawski
name:sk=Oravská priehrada
name:pl=zbiornik Orawski

No need to make any drama here if someone forgot to add a tag, add it yourself ;)
Liqid1010 (2024-10-08 11:47:14+00:00): I think it is very petty and unfriendly to stand by the two-language name. No one in Poland would ever even know that few meters of the dam are in Poland or would ever suggest that it is a polish reservoir. When you look at the map and find the polish name deep in Slovakia, basically any reasonable person would tell you there is no reason for it. If you really want to, I see no problem in splitting it and letting you name the small part in Polish. Maybe the general rule says to have bilingual name, but the actual situation on site and in anyone's mind dictates that bilingual name here is unreasonable. And that should be above the general rules.
Mirecnet (2024-10-10 21:16:42+00:00): Co je to za blbost a co sa tu vobec riesi? :) 
Je to Oravska priehrada. PL variant tam v tagu je.
Mam to opravit?
Mirecnet (2024-10-10 21:34:32+00:00): Tie hranicne kamene na severnom brehu priehrady som zameriaval ja len nedavno. Oranska priehrada bola za Slovenskeho statu zamerana tak, aby do Polska vobec nezasahovala.
 Pre pohranicne problemy s Polskom.
https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%8Cesko-slovensko-po%C4%BEsk%C3%BD_spor_o_Oravu_a_Spi%C5%A1

 Ta hranica bude zrejme zle zaznaceny na OSM. Google to ma uplne inak > https://www.google.com/maps/@49.4510407,19.6292717,15.42z?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI0MTAwOC4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D

Prebehnem tam a zameriam presne hranicne kamene do OSM.

Hradnicne kamene na severnom povodnovom brehu priehrady,
https://sk.mapy.cz/zakladni?source=osm&id=1103412571&gallery=1&sourcep=foto&idp=7140647&x=19.6401888&y=49.4552768&z=17
Mirecnet (2024-10-10 22:29:17+00:00): Upravil som severny breh Oravskej priehrady podla OrtomozajkySR a pridal som viditelne hranicne kamene podla LIDARu. Prebehne este osobne zameranie GPS.  Na Bingu  je rozvodnenie zase trocha inak. Na zaklade obkreslenia brehu mozeme zodpovedne povedat, ze Oravska priehrada sa na Polskom uzemi nenachadza. Maximalne tak na jar pocas extremnych zrazok. Teda cez povodne, kde bude voda maximalne po kolena :)
Warin61 (2023-09-29 01:12:00+00:00): Hi,
All caps in the street and suburb is wrong. I have corrected it on the single error.
Andrea Musuruane (2023-08-30 09:51:56+00:00): Hi. This road hasn't been drawn correctly according to Bing aerial images. I fixed it. BR, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140572578
Pan_Nug (2023-09-01 10:44:43+00:00): 	
Hi Andrea Musuruane, thank you for correcting the geometry. I didn't create the straight road because at this location 45.4712462, 7.9347897 there is some blockage visible in Bing Imagery which may prevent the traffic.
Andrea Musuruane (2023-09-02 08:27:08+00:00): I was referring to fact you draw a line inside the parking lot around here: 45.47136, 7.93463. See: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140572578&relations=true
Pan_Nug (2023-09-05 07:05:35+00:00): Thank you Andrea, Happy Mapping!
wayfar (2023-08-30 17:35:27+00:00): Sieht gut aus...der Gehweg befindet sich aber in Form eines Fußgängerwegs direkt neben der Fahrbahn also Bordsteingrenze, ist kein separater Weg mit Fläche dazwischen. Weiß aber nicht wie und ob man es perfektionieren müsse.
Piagno (2023-08-31 06:28:40+00:00): Da hast du Recht. Ich habe es im entsprechenden Bereich zu einem Bürgersteig geändert.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140618524
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140618587
Frans S (2023-08-30 14:31:33+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark about re-tagging of highways.
The tag footway is not a valid tag here.
When a trace is as narrow as 2 mtr, map it as a path. Otherwise, unclassified on this task.
You also re-tagged a stream to footway. Keep an eye on a trace how it runs. Is it meandering and often lined with green, it is mostly a waterway, Can you jump over it, tag it as stream, otherwise river.
Best regards
Stalker61 (2023-09-25 15:47:39+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Вы вообще русским языком владеете? Ну хоть в таком примитивном варианте? Хватит нести бред. Копипастить из отношений "официальные" названия автодорог, а точнее маршрутов. И банально ломать дорожный граф, а если еще конкретнее - вандалить данные.
Это тоже не ваших рук дело?  https://peirce.gis-lab.info/qa/RU-ARK/routing-map/3
Плохо вы закончите. Я бы вас сейчас забанил и все откатил одним махом.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-09-02 22:46:59+00:00): Reviewed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140573087
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-09-02 23:03:22+00:00): Where can i find the imagery?
Friniate (2023-08-30 16:57:15+00:00): There was consensus here https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/old-italian-and-german-toponyms-in-slovenia/102062/25 about the fact that the toponyms not used anymore in italian language should be moved to old_name:it or deleted. Please discuss there or stop your reverts.
edvac (2023-09-18 00:08:53+00:00): Dear Ramying and Friniate:

I kindly invite you to discuss over this naming issue (an ongoing discussion in the OSM community forum might be a good place [1], or any other forum as far as it is open), instead of initiating any edit war over this issue, that is always unacceptable.

Dear Ramying: Please answer this changeset question by Friniate so we may have your opinion.

Best Regards,

Rafael Avila Coya, on behalf of the OSM Foundation, Data Working Group.

[Ticket#2023091710000122]

[1] https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/old-italian-and-german-toponyms-in-slovenia/102062
Ramying (2023-11-10 07:16:28+00:00): ok
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-22 09:28:53+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11155433591/history has shop = health that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=health ? Current tag is not clear at all and can be made more specific... Is it place selling something medical-related?

or some place where alt-medicine practice is operating?

is it just a pharmacy? Then amenity=pharmacy should work

Or somehow differs from regular pharmacy?

If it is not a pharmacy - would https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=medical_supply describe it well?

maybe it could be shop=herbalist ? ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=herbalist )

maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=health_food or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=nutrition_supplements ?

Is it maybe a doctor office/clinic/etc? ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dclinic  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddoctors)

or is it something else? Maybe it does not exist at all?
burrscurr (2024-10-13 12:52:42+00:00): Hi KKRO,

Ich habe an der Haltestelle eben Bahnsteigkanten hinzugefügt, und ich glaube der ref:IFOPT-Wert an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/438396652/history war nicht korrekt. Dort hatten beide Bahnsteigseite (Gleis 2+4) den gleichen Wert. Ich gehe mal davon aus, dass das ein Fehler war, und die korrekte ref-Nummer für das Gleis 2 "de:09564:1504:11:2" (statt "de:09564:1504:11:4") ist. Ich kenne mich aber mit den IFOPT-refs nicht so gut aus. Falls das der Wert vorher doch korrekt war, würde ich das natürlich wieder rückgängig machen.

VG
burrscurr
kapazao (2023-09-01 16:57:27+00:00): Hola, ¿podrías explicar tus ediciones?
¿Por qué pones los nombres de esta forma y eliminas etiquetas wikidata?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140573800
rskedgell (2023-08-30 11:26:04+00:00): Thanks. I hadn't noticed that SC/SCEE only resolves the construction=* tag, but not construction:* lifecycle tags. It might be worth raising an issue on the StreetComplete Git repository.

(Sadly, there's no point me doing it, there is exactly zero chance of the developer implementing any issue or pull request I raise.)
spiregrain (2023-08-30 13:24:23+00:00): Weirdly, the relevant changeset doesn't appear to include the change to the building status - https://osmcha.org/changesets/140446293/

Have I lost track of your SC/SEE changeset somehow?
rskedgell (2023-08-30 13:36:34+00:00): They're in that changeset if you look at the history of individual objects, but for some reason OSMCha is only highlighting the change to the road.

See (e.g. ) versions 4 and 5 of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1117797720/history
Langlaeufer (2023-08-30 10:15:38+00:00): Hallo FerdiWall,
mit den Access-Tags bilden wir die Zutrittsrechte ab. Wenn der Feldweg nicht beschildert oder versperrt ist und es kein Gesetzt gibt, dass dort Radfahren verbietet, dann solltet du dort keine access-Tags setzen - es gelten die Standardregeln für diese Wegeart (Recht die Freie Landschaft zu betreten) Radfahren ist dann i.d.R. auch erlaubt. Die Befahrbarkeit kann man mit surface, smoothness und ggf. mtb:scale erfassen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140574255
FerdiWall (2023-08-30 12:39:13+00:00): Verstanden, danke für den Hinweis! Habe die access-Tags angepasst.
Langlaeufer (2023-08-30 13:30:40+00:00): Weterhin frohes mappen
HellMap (2023-08-30 09:36:12+00:00): Hello again,

Similar to before, where is the name "Jugla ditch" from? This seems like a highly unlikely official name for a tiny ditch section.
dvdhoven (2023-08-30 09:50:40+00:00): Je hebt door gebruik van ID, forse schade veroorzaakt in rcn route 84-91. Die heb ik hersteld
flohoff (2023-09-03 13:27:06+00:00): Moin,
bist du hier mit dem wegetyp sicher? Das ganze dingen ist als fläche und als "pedestrian" also fußgängerzone getagged. 

jetzt geht da ein "Bürgersteig" oder "Fußweg" mitten durch.

Flo
Kleni (2023-09-06 12:53:51+00:00): Ja, ich habe das eingetragen, damit die Routenplaner diesen Weg finden. Sonst planen die immer drumherum.
Kleni
flohoff (2023-09-06 12:58:51+00:00): ja - aber das ist kaputt. WENN sollte das kein footway sein sondern ein "highway=pedestrian" - Und der kriegt dann auch nicht nochmal den namen weil der ansonsten 30 mal überall hin gerendert wird.

Routing engines können nicht über flächen routen, d.h. wenn du eine Fläche wie die hier hast dann würde er nur auf der aussenkante der fläche routen können.

Und das mit dem Weg durch den Springbrunnen sieht auch sehr kaputt aus.

Flo
eggie (2023-08-30 09:00:51+00:00): Beste Maarten.
Wanneer er een bord G7 staat of duidelijk alleen voor voetgangers is bedoekd dan highway footway.
In alle andere gevallen highway path.
Footway icm met bicycle yes komt bijna niet voor.
Ook eindigt je footway in het verdere verloop op een cycleway?
Kijk je nog even?
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2023-08-30 09:02:45+00:00): Welk bord staar vooraan bij het Berkelse Zwethpad?
eggie (2023-08-31 07:55:12+00:00): Denk dat de wegbeheerder er een potje van heeft gemaakt.
Dat zal de reden zijn dat de voorgaande mapper het op highway=path heeft gehouden.
Er staat hier ook een G13 bord .. 
 Onverplicht fietspad. Dat zit ook in de tagging van de weg
Wellicht beter highway=path laten.  Kijk je nog even?
MVG
eggie