piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2025-10-11 21:35:27+00:00): Why did you extend the footprint here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173094936
Kraan46 (2025-10-12 07:48:23+00:00): Why not. Again i did for the best but you know better. The hamlet point in the woods as you did seems not correct to me.
Gregory Peony (2025-10-12 21:08:51+00:00): I mapped the footprint smaller than the roof, becasue the roof has a unique shape. I though this was due to it overhanging the walls. Perhaps you saw or considered something I had not.

I placed the POI between the two groups of buildings I think form a settlement. Why does it seem incorrect? How would you map it?
Romwriter (2025-10-11 20:14:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170662263
melody_Tej (2025-10-15 05:45:38+00:00): Hi Romwriter, 
Thank you for reverting the changeset. I will be more aware of edit histories in my future edits.
felipeeugenio (2025-10-10 20:41:29+00:00): Hola,
Revisando tu edición, notamos que utilizaste dos o tres polígonos distintos superpuestos sobre las estructuras visibles en la imagen aérea. A primera vista parece estar correcto, pero al hacer una revisión más detallada se observa que la mayoría de los polígonos no coinciden con lo que realmente aparece en la foto.

No se trata de exigir una precisión topográfica, pero te pediríamos por favor evitar este tipo de ediciones destinadas solo a rellenar espacios vacíos. Hace algunos meses ya tuvimos que eliminar una gran cantidad de polígonos de “bosques” en este mismo sector por una situación similar, ya que no correspondían con la realidad en terreno.

Voy a intentar corregir esta edición, pero en el futuro, si se repiten casos así, probablemente será necesario revertir los cambios. Corregir errores es parte del proceso, pero este tipo de ediciones se alejan bastante del objetivo de reflejar con fidelidad lo que existe realmente en terreno.

Saludos, y si deseas comentar o aclarar algo, por favor hazlo a través del chat de Telegram.
jptolosa (2025-10-11 20:43:39+00:00): Hola rlaracol, hay muchos cercos que intersectan con casas, que en algunos casos probablemente no existen o son muros. Además en muchos casos el polígono no se corresponde con la forma de la casa.
Saludos.
parukhin (2025-12-27 14:06:40+00:00): Точно умер?
На сайте, у яндекса и 2гис жив
Ну и здание не стоило "сносить"
oo-O-oo (2025-12-27 14:53:54+00:00): Реанимировался с начала декабря. Логистику поменяли и навезли товар. В яндексе и 2гисе тоже был удален.
eggie (2025-10-10 15:46:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
ika-chan! (2025-10-11 02:55:14+00:00): Please, will you please stop adding junction layouts that do not exist in real life, like what you did at 38.413403,22.838091 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436929596?

Please explain why are you continuing to add non-existent junction layouts despite many block messages telling you to not do it?
Yog Sot (2025-10-10 18:24:11+00:00): na przyszłość, nie łącz granic ewidencyjnych z drogami
Nadja15 (2025-10-10 14:08:50+00:00): Se denna kartanteckning för motivation till varför jag ändrade tillbaka: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4966142
osmmapper222 (2025-10-10 14:41:58+00:00): Hallo asitambuke,

abgerissene Gebäude sollten lieber mit `demolished:building=...` getaggt werden, statt sie zu entfernen. Das Gebäude wird dann nicht mehr gerendert und es verhindert, dass andere Mapper ein Gebäude auf Basis von (alten) Luftbildern wieder kartieren:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished:building
osmmapper222 (2025-10-15 17:48:42+00:00): Hallo asitambuke,

du scheinst neu bei OSM zu sein. Bauwerke wie Garagen werden üblicherweise mit building=garage getaggt, statt im Namensfeld Garage einzugeben. 

Durch die Tags wird semantisch klar, was dieses Bauwerk ist und es kann somit von Computern/Programmen verarbeiten werden. Garagen haben überlicherweise auch keine Adressen (diese waren amtlichen Karten auch nciht sichtbar). Ich habe die Garagen entsprechend angepasst.
Dimitar155 (2025-10-10 17:39:42+00:00): И добавен intermittent=yes към поток в другия край на държавата :).
Dimitar155 (2025-10-10 17:17:23+00:00): Адреса на блока е отбелязан върху самата сграда, не е необходимо да го дублирате.
KennyDap (2026-01-04 11:25:15+00:00): Fix Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176814625
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-24 15:30:51+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173723913
rempshaener (2025-10-12 17:18:42+00:00): Hallo, 
Ich habe einige Anmerkungen zu deinen Bearbeitungen.
ref und fire_hydrant:diameter 
In das Feld „ref“ kommt die Hydrantennummer, die oben rechts auf dem Hydrantenschild ausgewiesen ist. Die Zahl nach dem „H“ ist die Nennweite, die gehört in fire_hydrant:diameter
Geometrie: 
Am Beispiel https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12832897620: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen. 
Viele Grüße
Lukas48 (2025-10-16 16:52:57+00:00): Hey das mit den Hydranten auf der Straßenpunkt ist behoben. Das mit den Hydranten größe hab ich großteils auch schon umgeschrieben, fehlen noch ein paar
rempshaener (2025-10-16 20:21:09+00:00): Hallo,
danke für die Rückmeldung und gutes Gelingen.
Viele Grüße
jcarlson (2025-10-29 20:47:22+00:00): hi there! while i do not disagree with your change, please note that "unclassified" has a very distinct meaning in OSM highway tagging, it is not an "unidentified" road type.
aceman444 (2025-11-02 17:14:02+00:00): Zdravim, aky je zdroj Vasich udajov? Ortofoto asi nie.
Pernycek (2025-11-02 17:18:27+00:00): Zdravim, mám od zaměstnavatele databázi bazilik, kde mám doplnit bazilika=minor.
aceman444 (2025-11-04 19:44:41+00:00): Dakujem. A je tato databaza verejna, ci aka je licencia, ze sa smie pouzit do OSM? A odkial boli ziskane udaje do tejto databazy?
Aj ked podla wiki stranky k tomuto tagu su vsetky bazililiky (okrem 4) na svete 'minor', tak je otazny prinos celeho tohto znacenia...
Frans S (2025-10-10 15:13:46+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You did not map any building here.
Just marked a residential area and added a hamlet node.
I mapped the buildings
Best regards
emoerup (2025-10-10 18:15:52+00:00): Hello Frans S

Thanks for your feedback.

I was concentrating on the residential area. I saw that the buildings were not mapped. But I thought it was ok, and didn't try to see if I had access to map them.
Kind regards
Erik - emoerup
user_5359 (2025-10-12 07:07:00+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1436939832. What is the mean of the tag buiding:min = 4? Did you mean building:min_level?
aktivnutzer (2025-10-10 14:50:56+00:00): Nachsatz: es gibt keine ausgeschilderte Beschränkung.
phodgkin (2025-12-03 20:52:08+00:00): If the car park is open, why not tag this as amenity=parking?
eggie (2025-10-10 15:50:22+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Bedankt voor je bijdrage. Gebruik svp
Deprecated. Use currency:XBT=*
ipv https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:bitcoin

MVG
eggie
Ansofter (2025-10-12 22:04:21+00:00): please see osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Gicorada (2025-10-13 06:49:38+00:00): Sorry, using Level0 I didn't realize the geographical size, my changesets usually are local
eggie (2025-10-10 15:58:15+00:00): Dag notabear.. So aangepast naar Su.
MVG
eggie
user_23274985 (2025-10-10 17:13:46+00:00): 👍
Comino (2025-10-11 06:44:44+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
eggie (2025-10-10 15:54:00+00:00): Dag  notabear,

Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode en één fast food verwijderd op hetzelfde punt.
MVG
eggie
Udarian (2025-10-10 17:09:18+00:00): thank you so much for this
ilias_ (2025-10-10 17:44:25+00:00): Ya un signe où il y a écrit rue aeria sport ?
Comino (2025-10-11 07:01:09+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
cronoser (2026-03-12 23:01:00+00:00): se debe mapear como building=yes
cronoser (2026-03-12 23:00:39+00:00): corregida etiqueta
mcliquid (2025-10-11 07:30:13+00:00): Grüß dich! Das Beachvolleyballfeld ist ja schon separat eingetragen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1082766111
Eignet sich das Umfeld wirklich als Kinderspielplatz?
seewäldler (2025-10-12 15:55:02+00:00): Hallo! 
Ja, das fand ich auch komisch, aber das Feld ist so wie die anderen Häfler Spielplätze ausgeschildert. Ich glaube die Stadt hat da die gleichen Schilder für alles vom Sandkasten bis zum fussbaldfeldgrossen Bolzplatz für die fast-nicht-mehr-Kinder.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-10-10 17:21:37+00:00): Merhaba. Burada gerçekten bir anıt var mı? Yoksa, mola noktanızı kaydetmek isterken yanlışlıkla mı oluşturdunuz?

Hello. Is there really a monument here? Or did you create it by mistake while trying to save your rest stop point?
aTarom (2025-10-13 10:32:26+00:00): Hi, the entire Gulf of Saint-Malo has been marked as an islet, this seems incorrect, can you review it?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12913145/history
Cheers
mueschel (2025-10-12 11:31:04+00:00): Could you check this object, it got a strange recycling tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436953392
JLZIMMERMANN (2025-10-13 16:35:51+00:00): thansks the idea is to gather all indiviual containers with a surface 'platforme'
mueschel (2025-10-13 16:46:49+00:00): You want to tag the area that contains all the containers and (depending on design) might have a different paving style or some kind of small wall around it?
JLZIMMERMANN (2025-10-14 07:03:21+00:00): the idea is the same than in sport
leisure=sports_centre [out]
leisure=pitch [in]
mueschel (2025-10-19 08:20:31+00:00): I don't think we already have a tag for this.
Here are some ideas:

It could be "landuse=recycling" - focusing on how this area is used.

It could be "man_made=recycling_place" - a structure (platform, marked area) for recycling

There could also be a new value for "recycling_type" - currently we only have "container" and "centre"
Pipi Ferry 99 (2026-06-14 10:11:13+00:00): Zakaj odstranjuješ imena ulic? Zaradi tega potem programi ne najdejo naslovov stavb!
damjang (2026-06-14 21:25:17+00:00): Imena ulic? Tista imena ulic ne obstajajo. Tu ni imen ulic! Je samo ime vasi. Problem je od programov, ki se morajo prilagoditi!
Pipi Ferry 99 (2026-06-16 15:55:45+00:00): Vidim, da si že razpravljal z nekom o istem problemu:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159214799
confusedbuffalo (2025-10-11 04:13:39+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding this. It looks like you might have missed a digit on the phone number though. Can you double check and fix it? Thanks
VLD192 (2025-12-09 15:35:41+00:00): Hello, 

I am reaching out regarding some of the edits made in this changeset. Adding crossing tags to footway/footway crossings seems to go against OSM standards. Crossing nodes should be used where two paths intended for different modes of transportation cross each other. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Crossings. 

See nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12304820247 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12304820257 for examples. I feel that a barrier=kerb (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dkerb) node would be more appropriate at these locations. 

The issue seems to be widespread in the area and any clarification would be appreciated. 
Thanks and I look forward to hearing from you. 
VLD192 (Casey)
Hidden Mountain (2025-10-11 13:23:33+00:00): Просьба не херачить казахскую латиницу в name:en
NeisBot (2025-10-10 16:33:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-12 12:45:47+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173111763
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-11 03:59:48+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and fixed other tagging for Dogtopia POI in changeset 183951094

https://osm.org/changeset/183951094
Gonéo (2025-10-10 18:58:01+00:00): Merci pour la mise à jour. Tu as demandé une revue pour le changeset. D'après le wiki tu pourrais ajouter cycleway:left:lane=pictogram s'il y a des pictos vélo pour rappeler le double-sens cyclable.
eggie (2025-10-10 17:13:24+00:00): Dag prinshoek..

Een straatnaam is prima, maar al die accesstags horen niet op een weg. Dat is gewoon ingebakken (default).

MVG
eggie
prinshoek (2025-10-10 17:28:30+00:00): ok ja er was een accesstag voor fietsers, ik heb dat willen veranderen in toegangkelijk voor alles maar dat ging niet helemaal lekker. ik had eraf moeten blijven.
eggie (2025-10-10 17:32:37+00:00): Hoi   Editor iD doet allerlei suggesties om iets toe te voegen om het je makkelijk te maken, maar soms werkt dat averechts.
Het kan overigens geen kwaad.
Zie het als een tip. 

MVG
eggie
prinshoek (2025-10-10 17:39:07+00:00): ja hoor, bedankt. :)
eggie (2025-10-10 17:41:51+00:00): aangepast
prinshoek (2025-10-10 17:47:21+00:00): keurig
evgenykatyshev (2025-10-11 11:10:21+00:00): Очень странное название пляжа. Это его официальное название? Есть таблички с таким названием на местности?
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-10-11 10:14:51+00:00): Hi! The cycleway on the right is accessible to pedestrian, thus usable as a sidewalk.
Francoisepro (2025-10-11 14:07:34+00:00): Hi! Thanks for bringing this up. I was under the impression (my interpretation of the documentation) that tagging sidewalk:*=separate only applies when the separately mapped way is a highway=footway footway=sidewalk. I've been looking at documentation / OSM discussions trying to find guidance in those cases where the side path is not a sidewalk but does have designated foot access, but couldn't find anything. Are you aware of such doc? It would help everyone tag consistently.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-10-11 14:26:56+00:00): It is indeed possible to check for the footway=sidewalk tag, but the issue would be that if you want to analyse the presence of sidewalks/separated footways on all roads, it would then reduce this road to a one-sided separated footway access. Two solution: add the footway=sidewalk to the cycling path, which could be weird, but accurate in this case, or count cycleways alongside roads as a sidewalk.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-10-11 14:29:02+00:00): See here: it could be correct/legit to add the footway=sidewalk tag here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks#Cycleway_and_footway_on_sidewalk
WieKo68 (2026-01-23 23:48:01+00:00): Czy dla starówek miast nie powinien być protect_class=12?
Dawid2849 (2026-02-16 11:10:09+00:00): protect_class=12 służy do oznaczania wód, jak już to 22 by pasowało dla starówki.

Dałem tu 98 ze względu na to, że to obszar UNESCO, ale na wiki przy 98 jest dopisek: Consider using plain-English tagging alternatives instead of this value:

For UNESCO World Heritage Convention[9], see: International Heritage Registration Organisation

Jeśli dobrze rozumiem, to w teorii można, ale lepiej zastosować inne znaczniki, więc może najlepiej będzie w ogóle skasować ten znacznik?
user_5359 (2025-10-10 20:11:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved two nodes  https://www.osm.org/node/6885165759, https://www.osm.org/node/11365101510more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the nodes back to the original position.
TranslatorPS (2025-10-11 08:50:40+00:00): Nie zmieniaj tego, co jest dobrze wpisane. Numer przystanku jest wzięty z oficjalnych danych ZTP w Krakowie, to raz, a dwa, zgodnie z odpowiednimi przepisami przystanek po tej stronie ulicy musi być parzysty. Numer ref z czapy nie jest.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-10-10 17:36:26+00:00): Merhaba. "Ek Kütüphane Binası" olarak adlandırdığınız bina uydu görüntülerinde görünmüyor. Doğru yere eklediğinize emin misiniz?Bu bina yeni mi inşa edildi?
SomeoneElse (2025-10-11 10:57:34+00:00): For info this broke a couple of relations - I've fixed the ones I've found in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173131453
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-05 16:00:12+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13207214282/history has shop = accessories that was added in this edit
shop=accessories ? What kind of accessories are sold here? Fashion accessories? Car parts? Gun accessories?

Maybe use shop=fashion_accessories for clothing accessories, shop=car_parts for car accessories or other shop=* instead - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=accessories
Donnut (2025-10-10 17:52:19+00:00): This change I made is wrong.  I thought the mosque was bigger, but the additional area is the square in front of the mosque.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173106581
MxxCon (2025-11-20 21:58:26+00:00): Hello.
In general in OSM it's better to try to edit an existing feature to its current state rather than delete a feature and create a new one.
Editing an existing feature preserves history of that object, if there's ever a need to refer to it in the future. Doing delete/create loses that history.
In this specific case it's not so critical since that object didn't have any other edits, but in the future please try to avoid delete/create.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173107234
user_5359 (2025-10-10 20:01:07+00:00): You only added a website and description to an address node, but did not note that there is also a business there. And no, website and description isn't engouh.  If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://wiki.osm.org.
Rogoyski (2026-05-16 17:14:03+00:00): Wrysowane w tym zestawie zmian trawniki i inne elementy są poprzesuwane względem referencji. Proszę używaj podkładów Geoportalu, a jeśli używasz innych, upewnij się, że są skalibrowane.
YomanNH (2025-10-13 08:18:47+00:00): Ten przystanek obecnie istnieje?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5003752
YomanNH (2025-10-13 11:30:14+00:00): Wycofałem zmiany.
eggie (2025-10-10 19:09:56+00:00): Dag DKlaasen, Wellicht beter highway=footway gebruiken.  pedestrian gebruiken we voor voetgangersgebieden..  Bv in winkelgebieden.

MVG
eggie
sykul (2025-10-11 15:42:39+00:00): Why did you change the Basic Fit from 24/7 to some made-up opening hours even though the tagged Panoramax image and even the link you added both show 24/7?
RiverBearings (2025-10-15 21:26:27+00:00): Hello Novelgomez. 

I saw your updates in this changeset labeled "calle urbanas y vía en construcción”. My changes were intended to reflect the sections still under construction by tagging them as highway:proposed=secondary to indicate their future classification once the coastal road opens, while retaining their current status as highway=residential. 
New imagery along the coast of Pedernales from just a few days ago (October 10th, 2025) shows no paving along the road  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1388891373 and breaks in the continuation of the it at 18.031125383211602, -71.75316437281425 and 18.032167530490526, -71.75715555175844. Would you consider the construction=secondary for this section of road as that would be more in line with OSM’s construction tagging guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction)?

However, if you know the road will be completed and open soon and would like to retain the highway=secondary classification, would you consider adding access=no tags until it is fully open?
Thank you for your consideration on this. 
Best, RiverBearings

— Traducción automática —

Hola Novelgomez. 

Vi tus actualizaciones en este conjunto de cambios denominado "Calle urbana y vía en construcción". Mis cambios buscaban reflejar los tramos aún en construcción, etiquetándolos como highway:proposed=secondary para indicar su futura clasificación una vez que se abra la carretera costera, manteniendo su estado actual como highway=residential.
Nuevas imágenes a lo largo de la costa de Pedernales de hace unos días (10 de octubre de 2025) muestran la carretera sin pavimentar (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1388891373) y cortes en su continuación en 18.031125383211602, -71.75316437281425 y 18.032167530490526, -71.75715555175844. ¿Consideraría la clasificación "construcción=secundaria" para este tramo de carretera, ya que se ajustaría mejor a las directrices de etiquetado de construcción de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction)?

Sin embargo, si sabe que la carretera se completará y abrirá pronto y desea mantener la clasificación "carretera=secundaria", ¿consideraría añadir etiquetas "acceso=sin" hasta que esté completamente abierta?

Gracias por su consideración.
Atentamente, RiverBearings
Glassman (2025-10-11 19:28:32+00:00): #TIP: flock devices should not be connected to ways, like sidewalks. I usually look for a poles shadow when adding things like this. I went ahead and unglued the device.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173109136
eggie (2025-10-10 19:06:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Wanneer het oneway=no is geworden kunnen de uitzonderingen voor tweewiels eruit.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Djann (2025-10-10 19:18:43+00:00): Ah, bedankt. Ik had wel gekeken of de oneways goed stonden, maar had niet bedacht dat de uitzondering geheel eruit gehaald kon worden.
Dat gebeurt door de hele One Way (Bycicles) tag te verwijderen?
eggie (2025-10-10 19:24:29+00:00): Yep gewoon in dat stukje de regels verwijderen.
iD is een lastige editor soms. Die maakt anders van no>yes.
Dus alle tags zichtbaar kiezen en dan de regels verwijderen van de tweewielers.
Succes,
eggie
pan_borsuk (2025-11-03 10:49:38+00:00): cześć Sashnikus_sashnikutus22229
ja z pytaniem co to za "pajączki" ścieżek ? byłem tam wczoraj i nie ma takowych w terenie rzeczywistym
pan_borsuk (2025-11-03 10:59:19+00:00): a ta "ścieżka" od Albatrosów do Fortu 50a Lasówka też nie istnieje (już pomijając że zaznaczyłęś że to dla rowerów i koni też ścieżka :-)

przeszedłem wczoraj z 20 metrów w gęstwinie kukurydzy a potem przeskoczyłęm w lewo przez jakieś mokradło, wspołem się na wzgórek. przedarłem się pod gałeziami i szedłem samym krajem zaoranego pola potem jak pole się skończyło i trafiłem na ścianę krzacków zeszdłem w prawo z wzgórka i przeskakując przez mokradło przedzierałem sie przez kukurydzę a potem ciut na lewo przez krzewy i pokrzywy wszedłem na Golikówkę. po drodze nie było żadnej ścieżki.

ps. nie wiem czy wiesz ale można oznaczać poziom widzialności ścieżek (gradacja)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility
YomanNH (2025-11-03 13:23:13+00:00): Autor tych zmian jest zwykłym trollem. Dodawał mnóstwo fikcji, którą usuwałem. Na szczęście chyba dał już sobie spokój z mapowaniem. Na pewno Ci nie odpowie. Możesz śmiało usuwać/poprawiać ścieżki, jeśli pamiętasz ich układ :)
YomanNH (2025-10-10 20:03:01+00:00): Po raz kolejny: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian