piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-27 14:51:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1015603252

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
AndreaDp271 (2025-05-29 14:40:44+00:00): very big area, why?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166831068
PèreForez (2025-05-29 16:19:29+00:00): I don't kow why ! Because my work area is always limited to French territory.
And I dont know how to reduce the dimension of this very large area ....
If you can... I  agree !
fortera_au (2025-06-01 06:25:20+00:00): You deleted a tag from an object in Australia, which I have restored.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166831068
PèreForez (2025-06-01 14:10:46+00:00): J'ai supprimé la relation de limite administrative  dans les attributs . dites-moi si c'est la bonne opération
fortera_au (2025-06-01 23:04:18+00:00): Why did you remove it? It's a valid tag on a relation in an entirely different country. Please don't remove tags if you're not sure whether it's correct.
pyrog (2025-06-02 19:26:33+00:00): Hi Andrea,
It was a mistake. PèreForez would like to do something in Cherbourg (in France) and select Cherbourg (in Australia).

Thanks for the fix,
Yves

https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/interference-dune-limite-administrative-avec-groupe-de-modifications/34585/3
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-06-01 01:58:41+00:00): Why was the tag removed? The way still provides connections.
jbcharron (2025-05-29 16:04:09+00:00): Bonjour,
Ce poi est en doublon, pouvez-vous fusionner vos modifications avec le POI existant ?
Merci
Jean-Baptiste
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-05-30 07:11:33+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour votre alerte, le doublon a été supprimée

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
Udarian (2025-05-27 18:09:41+00:00): why did you delete so meany buildings and benches (along with other features), whats you source for this.
Nine-tailed (2025-11-14 01:39:38+00:00): Константин, вы с тропинками перестарались и прямо через территорию бугровской школы N 3 через заборы их провели. Там нет таких троп.
Константин Гам (2025-11-14 07:44:00+00:00): Поля рисовал со стравы и выборочно проверял...
Вижу тропинку да, подозрительную. Может там дырка в заборе у них была... как раз тепловая карта обновляется 2 раза в году и сейчас вроде тоже она виднеется...

В любом случае, если есть возможность - исправьте по факту. Я не знаю когда до Мурино смогу доехать...
Timmy_Tesseract (2026-03-06 06:32:00+00:00): Good day. May I ask why you removed the toll=yes tag here? 

All hikers, cyclists and motorbikes are required to pay a toll when using this trail.
ChromeLotus (2026-03-09 21:28:50+00:00): Hello Timmy_Tesseract,

I removed the toll tag on this segment of path at Green Mountain View because toll tagging is usually applied to drivable roads and it is usually not applied to paths. The fee tag(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fee) might be more applicable in this case. Hopefully that answers your question. What do you think about adding a fee tag instead?

-ChromeLotus
Timmy_Tesseract (2026-04-06 01:44:07+00:00): It appears that the wiki documention on this issue is a bit inconsistent. While the page for toll only explicitly mentions roads, the page for fee contains this statement:

"toll=* - to indicate that a road, bridge, ferry, or other way is tolled - that you must pay to use it. This key is used instead of fee=*."

According to taginfo there are 3300 occurrences of path + toll but only 1300 for path + fee. Even for footways toll is more commonly used with 1900 occurrences vs. 1600 for fee.

Considering a similar discussion on toll vs. fee for ferry routes (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/toll-yes-or-fee-yes-for-ferry-routes/119341) it seems that mappers use both tags for different but overlapping purposes. Best way forward might be to improve wiki pages to document both use cases and propose verifiable criteria for differentiation.
ChromeLotus (2026-04-07 19:19:00+00:00): Reading the OSM tagging discussion, I personally gravitate towards clay-c’s input, which specifically defines fee=* as access to a specific area; amenity; or service (duration vs. frequency use). I did not know that there is slightly higher use of toll=* in combination with highway=path than fee=*, which might corroborate your observations in how these tags are used (there is lacking consensus among OSM users in terms of tag usage). And because of that, I think your proposal to identify user cases and creating a criteria that differentiates the two tags is a great idea and worth pursuing.
eggie (2025-05-27 19:25:54+00:00): office=property_management		Office of a property rental company for residential apartments or commercial office space or any other property.
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office
Groet
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-27 15:30:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być formatu XX-XXX, gdzie X oznacza cyfrę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12867003866

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12867003873
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413539392
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413539393

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
gscholz (2025-05-28 06:27:03+00:00): Hi Majida95,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue marker), some ways are displaced as well:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-2.75055&lat=34.93736&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166832699

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2025-05-29 06:13:47+00:00): Hi Majida95, 
due to your missing response I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
fabiotofy (2025-05-27 19:26:18+00:00): Ciao buona sera. Nel tag addr:city è obbligatorio indicare il Comune ovvero, in questo caso, Tavagnacco. Se vuoi dare maggiori indicazioni al tuo indirizzo e quindi aggiungere anche l'indicazione della frazione (Feletto) devi cambiare questo tag in addr:place o meglio ancora, visto che il civico è riferito chiaramente ad una via, addr:subburb. Correggi quando puoi. Grazie
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166832840
AntMadeira (2025-05-27 21:20:47+00:00): Olá, meioserrano.
O nome deste caminho é mesmo assim? Isto não é mais uma descrição do que propriamente um nome?

Cumprimentos,
António.
meioserrano (2025-05-30 08:49:20+00:00): Olá,
Sim de facto é o nome de um trilho informal..  corresponde ao dito trilho (mas também é descritivo..) acabei por tirar
Corrigi e manti apenas um pequeno troço que é estradão/caimho de acesso (é certo que não tem toponímia)
AntMadeira (2025-05-30 10:34:18+00:00): Parece-me bem.

Obrigado!
fabiotofy (2025-05-27 19:28:45+00:00): Ciao, ricordati di aggiungere agli indirizzi anche i tag obbligatori addr:city e addr:postcode.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166833303
fabiotofy (2025-05-27 19:30:11+00:00): il civico 1d sembra forse essere meglio 11d. Da verificare
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166833303
ivanbranco (2025-05-27 19:45:07+00:00): Ciao Fabio, che i tag addr:city e addr:postcode siano obbligatori, come stai scrivendo a vari utenti, non è vero. Addirittura la wiki dice che sono spesso ridondanti: "Tag come addr:country=*, addr:city=* e addr:postcode=* sono spesso ridondanti dato che le caratteristiche all'interno dei confini amministrativi (se presenti) "ereditano" i loro attributi, in alcuni software come Nominatim o Photon."
fabiotofy (2025-05-27 20:00:52+00:00): CIAO! Secondo le linee guida ufficiali della wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses sono tag fortemente consigliati od addirittura obbligatori nelle zone cui i confini comunali siano imprecisi oppure il territorio comunale comprenda più zone CAP non delimitate da apposite relazioni. Quest'ultimo caso, in Italia, è sempre senza relazione in quanto gli areali delle zone CAP non sono noti. O comunque non esistono fonti ufficiali ove reperirli e poterli inserire in OSM. Infine civici appartenenti ad un comune, ma cui le coordinate puntano in un areale riconducibile ad un altro Comune purtroppo di casi di questo tipo ne siamo pieni in Friuli. Viste le frequenti discrepanze tra coordinate e confini comunali ufficiali, lasciare all'interpretazione automatica è, secondo me, fonte certa di errori. Il mio pensiero, in conclusione, è che quindi i tag addr:city e addr:postcode sono "praticamente" obbligatori.
whb (2025-05-29 11:29:08+00:00): Gebäude-Tag wieder hinzugefügt.
user_5359 (2025-05-28 08:32:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use Hashtags only for the changeset comments and don't add standard name like name=House for a building.
WarmedCord207 (2025-05-27 16:02:49+00:00): Ini bukti dari set perubahan ini: https://youtu.be/dbGh_CS6PgM&t=826
NeisBot (2025-05-27 16:07:54+00:00): Hi angerwirt, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added private parking area with associated tags and geometry"

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #AIgenerated #Gibberish
fabiotofy (2025-05-27 19:33:21+00:00): Se la strada residenziale porta agli accessi di civici chiramente riferiti a "Via Braida Trebel" puoi aggiungere il relativo tag "name" alla highway. Assurdo comunque che questo pezzo di Via Braida Trebel non sia collegato in nessun modo con il tronco principale (più a Nord)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166833935
Tinbertos (2025-05-30 01:35:51+00:00): Scusate: errore mio che ho copiato da un nodo adiacente; l'errore non sarebbe comunque sfuggito al riversamento in Solar che farò ora che ho completato l'aggiornamento di tutta la via con i dati del rilievo. Saluti!
evgenykatyshev (2025-05-27 16:20:41+00:00): I don't know why so many objects were affected with creating new version without any changes were made
felipeeugenio (2025-11-05 18:17:53+00:00): Hello. Just a comment. Those internal streets for buildings, are =services, not residential streets.

regards
GuainiaRiver (2025-11-07 17:17:32+00:00): Hello felipeeugenio,

Thank you for the reminder, I will model such roads as service from here on out.
whb (2025-05-29 11:32:07+00:00): Rückgängig, da falsche Zuordnung der Hausnummer, nicht das komplette Gebäude ist der Kindergarten, Gebäude-Tag wurde entfernt
mueschel (2025-05-29 10:24:48+00:00): Hi,
would you please point us to the discussion and documentation of this massive world-wide retagging of food amenities?
New tags are not introduced by creating a Wiki page and immediately retagging objects all across the world. 

A new top-level tag for one special kind of food is a weird choice. There are established tagging schemes that should be followed.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-29 12:50:17+00:00): Have you discussed this mass replacement anywhere?

see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/the-description-of-cuisine-beef-noodle-is-so-weird/130594/12
DD1GJ (2025-05-28 12:19:19+00:00): Moin ofularcom, Sockenpuppe von moin-meister aka "Matteo Neumann ".

inzwischen solltest Du bemekt haben, dass Deine phantasievollen Beiträge hier unerwünscht sind. Benutze für Deine kindischen Spielereien z.B.

https://www.opengeofiction.net/

https://inkarnate.com/
Gregory Peony (2025-06-04 23:07:09+00:00): The footprint I flagged outlines 2 buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166835338
Merna_mahmoud (2025-05-28 13:03:26+00:00): Hello Sandalss,
Thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap in Oman.
I noticed that you deleted some streets within the Omani border control. It is an acceptable modification, but this deletion resulted in some barriers without streets.
Examples :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11384328675
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11384328881
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11384329112
Please delete those barriers without streets, there is no need to leave them
Happy to connect with you
Regards,
Merna_mahmoud
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-26 07:28:47+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173781714
TerraScribe (2025-05-28 16:54:19+00:00): source:IGN-Cadastre 2025
TrickyFoxy (2025-06-07 09:45:18+00:00): Вы видели эту тропу глазами? https://osm.org/way/1390129255
Константин Гам (2025-06-07 11:23:22+00:00): Это нечто зимнее, аля лыжня
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-27 17:40:58+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2472525117
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278503601

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bartgron (2025-05-27 21:08:42+00:00): Usunąłem zdublowany adres
NeisBot (2025-05-27 20:51:55+00:00): Hi Nairobi9876, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added a guidepost marker with informational tags in Nairobi National Park."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #AIgenerated #Gibberish
Nairobi9876 (2025-05-31 08:27:19+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. 

Added this marker that was missing from OSM that exists within the park.
Tallguy (2025-05-28 08:36:37+00:00): Hi, 
Thank you for the change. I'll try to go there to check details, but on first glance the updated  information is probably correct, but does this mean that the nearby house 'Ashley' should not be there?
NeisBot (2025-05-27 17:52:21+00:00): Hi Sam737, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added ICAO code to an existing way, likely indicating it represents an aerodrome."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #AIgenerated #Gibberish
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-28 09:06:35+00:00): Hello, and thank you for your edits!

Please note that copyrighted data (such as data sourced from Govmap) is not allowed on OSM, so I've reverted this change.

Please also note that "unclassified road" doesn't mean "unknown type". It means something else. use `highway=road` for roads with unknown types.

Info on "unclassified":

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified

Israel guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel
Artyom Skrobov (2025-05-28 09:25:03+00:00): Is there any non-copyrighted source for administrative boundaries? osm.wiki/Israel says "Only map things that are on the ground", but administrative boundaries don't exist on the ground.
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-28 11:39:15+00:00): You're absolutely correct about admin boundaries not existing on the ground. 

The "ground truth" rule in Israel guidelines is just a reflection of the global OSM rule: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground , but I think the way it's formulated in the IL version needs a bit of tweaking.

The MOIN (ministry of interior) had previously given us data in 2011. This is the origin of the boundaries you've edit. Discussion was here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/importing-official-administrative-boundaries/53748

I think it's a good idea to check out that that thread, or post a question there, so that the people who were involved can reply.

I think it's entirely plausible the data is freely available outside of govmap, or that govmap would give explicit permission, but I haven't investigated this myself.
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-28 11:41:20+00:00): Administrative boundaries are not "verifiable": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability

Usually, unverifiable things are not mapped in OSM. It seems like this is an unwritten exception for sufficiently important things, such as country borders and such.
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-28 11:18:10+00:00): תודה על התרומות!

הוספת כאן כפילות - נא להקפיד לבדוק אם יש כבר את הנקודה לפני שמוסיפים
ChehrehBargi (2025-08-20 18:26:38+00:00): Hello
You have used tags that do not exist in Iran. If you return the wrong tag, you will be reported.
NeisReview (2025-05-27 18:03:08+00:00): #DataImport

Hi, welcome to OSM!

With this changeset, you've added a significant number of features that appear to share similarities in their tags. Could you please let us know more about the source of your mapping activity? Is this a data import?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks!
Chifuniro Baluwa (2025-05-27 18:58:02+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reaching out and for the warm welcome to OSM!
Yes, this is indeed a data import, and I appreciate you asking for clarification. I should have been more proactive in communicating this through the proper OSM import channels.

About the Data Source: This dataset comes from a peer-reviewed research project titled "Updated fine-scale location data for Blantyre district collected using a low-cost approach" that we conducted in collaboration with local authorities and community health workers in Blantyre, Malawi. The research has been submitted to Scientific Data (Nature) and is currently under review (manuscript SDATA-25-00373).

To shed more on the data collection methodology, data was collected using a participatory mapping approach with trained community health workers and local informants. GPS coordinates were captured using smartphones with high-accuracy GPS apps. All locations were ground-truthed and validated through multiple quality control layers. The project focused on mapping previously undocumented community locations in underserved areas.

I realise I should have followed the formal OSM import process more thoroughly. However, I'm prepared to document this import on the OSM Import page following community guidelines and provide detailed source attribution and methodology.

The raw dataset is also being made publicly available through Zenodo as part of our research publication, ensuring full transparency and reproducibility. Here is a link to our dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15487740 

Thank you for your enquiry, and I look forward to contributing positively to the OSM community.

Thank you!!!
NeisReview (2025-05-28 13:02:19+00:00): Thank you very much for the detailed response. It would be great if you could include a data source for all future changesets, and possibly for past ones as well. For new changesets, you could add this as a source tag. For existing changesets that have already been made, you could add a comment - similar to this one here.

I'm not a licensing expert, but the dataset you mentioned and used is published under the "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International" license. Can this data be imported into OSM without any issues? In other words, is this license compatible with the ODbL license? And can you ensure proper attribution for your dataset?

Thanks and best regards,
Pascal
Chifuniro Baluwa (2025-05-28 14:28:47+00:00): Thank you for the guidance on proper OSM procedures.
Regarding source attribution, I will absolutely add proper source attribution going forward. For future changesets, I'll include the source tag, and I'll go back and add comments to the existing changesets as you suggested. Thank you for the example.
Regarding Licensing, you raise an excellent point about license compatibility. After considering this carefully, I believe the most appropriate approach would be to dual-license our dataset specifically for OSM contribution under ODbL.
Since we are the original data collectors and copyright holders, we have the flexibility to license our dataset differently for different platforms:
Zenodo version remains CC BY 4.0 for academic researchers
For OSM contribution should be Licensed under ODbL to ensure full compatibility.
I am thinking this approach will allow us to serve both the academic community (via Zenodo) and the broader geospatial community (via OSM) while respecting each platform's licensing requirements and community standards.
Let me know if this approach is acceptable to the OSM community and if yes, may you please guide me in proper procedure for licensing.

Regards,
Chifuniro.
NeisReview (2025-05-28 14:48:27+00:00): Hi Chifuniro,

Thank you for your thoughtful and well-reasoned message.

As I mentioned earlier, I'm not a licensing expert, so I can't confirm whether this approach fully aligns with OSM's legal requirements. I recommend reaching out to the OSM community either via the OSMF Licensing Working Group or by posting your proposal on the OSM Community Forum where more experienced members can offer informed guidance.

I really appreciate the effort you're making to ensure both compatibility and openness. Wishing you the best as you move forward with this!

Best regards, 
Pascal
GenericUsername4 (2025-05-27 17:59:30+00:00): I forgot to mention that I also added addresses to Herrington Court and also moved Hunter Pointe closer to the front of the neighborhood.
Peter_Foo (2025-06-03 18:17:30+00:00): znjaduja sie tam pozostalosci po cmentarzu ewangelickim
Szymson (2025-06-04 09:58:49+00:00): Pozostałości to nie jest cmentarz istniejący bądź nieczynny. Takich rzeczy nie mapujemy w OSM