piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5173844 (2026-04-26 13:37:04+00:00): Hi, the past discussion was inconclusive, with different people preferring different levels of details. I understand your motivation and respect your choice of mapping style and I would expect nothing less from you. You may consider data I am adding to OSM "excessive" but I don't.

If this town is your local area of interest (your mapping history is rich and very broad, so it is difficult for me to say which area you care about the most), I will refrain from mapping it, out of courtesy to you.
NeisBot (2026-04-16 09:57:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/3633634995 v6

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Print shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
Sébastien Pi (2026-05-21 14:25:54+00:00): Bonjour,

Je viens de constater une petite anomalie : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40675675
Vous avez déclarer sur cette voie un sens unique (qui est réel, bonne correction). Et ajouté un cycleway:left qui existe aussi (2e bonne correction).
Toutefois, vous n’avez pas ajouté oneway:bicycle=no (à faire pour un DSC, ce qui est le cas ici) : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway:bicycle

Je ne sais pas si c’est un oubli ou une méconnaissance. Mais je préfère vous remonter le problème. Le cycleway:left indique juste qu’il y a une bande à gauche de la route, le sens est présumé identique à la route. Il faudrait ajouter ici cycleway:left:oneway=-1 pour indiquer que c’est dans le sens inverse (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:cycleway:right:oneway). Ceci en complément du oneway:bicycle=no (qui est la méthode conseillée car plus simple à gérer par les applications).

Je viens de survoler les changements liés liés aux autres rues que vous avez fait. Je n’en trouve pas d’autres dans ce cas. Un oubli ?

Merci
Carte-on (2026-05-21 14:52:50+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour la correction !
Je pense que c'est plus une méconnaissance, car j'utilise StreetComplete habituellement pour ajouter les voies cyclables. C'est une des rares fois où je l'ai fait sur PC afin de passer la route en sens unique, sans savoir qu'il fallait faire cette précision aussi.
J'irai vérifier mes autres contributions dès que possible pour m'assurer ne pas avoir refait cette erreur ailleurs !
Sébastien Pi (2026-05-21 15:00:26+00:00): Ça marche.
Carte-on (2026-05-21 15:05:34+00:00): Le reste semble bon ! C'est la seule fois où j'ai mis un sens unique avec une voie cyclable la remontant.
Merci pour l'explication, j'étais hélas passé à côté de cette consigne.
NeisBot (2026-04-16 10:03:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12715410766 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dental clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
rarad74 (2026-04-16 13:01:56+00:00): Sa folosesti te rog imaginile mapbox pe Bucuresti. Sunt cele mai noi 2024-2025. Bing sunt mai vechi de 8-10 ani.
wolfbert (2026-04-16 16:57:15+00:00): Please test your data import (not with live data on a full country scale) and announce and discuss any such imports on the country forum beforehand.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181405229
relaxxe (2026-04-17 21:31:04+00:00): This data was originally located in a different layer in JOSM. I didn't want to upload it or test anything. Sorry about that; it was just a mistake, and I have now removed it. It was just a suggestion for a potential new solar panel. I don't create automated edits.
Oss lk (2026-06-01 08:12:53+00:00): Cartographic looting or the embodiment of an innocent dream?
sge444 (2026-07-20 15:44:52+00:00): This looks like fake
streckenkundler (2026-04-16 19:32:13+00:00): Hei,

mal von mir als Lübbener ein herzliches Willkommen bei OSM! Lieben Dank für deine Arbeit! Bist du aus Vetschau? Dann wäre ich dir sehr verbunden, auch mal auf die anderen Notes zu schauen! Vorab schon mal Danke!

Ganz spezielle 1-2 Dinge korrigiere ich gleich, da betrifft die Fahrradknotenpunktnetze... Das ist aber ein Manko von iD... Das kenne ich seit Jahren, daß da iD bei einigen Dingen da so seine Schwächen hat. Ich bin da aber tiefenentspannt... nicht jeder kann alles und erst recht nicht gleich... :)

Grüße aus der Nachbarschaft,

Sven
streckenkundler (2026-04-16 19:48:50+00:00): So... die 1-2 speziellen Dinge betreffend... mit meinem CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181429566 habe ich noch das Fahrradknotenpunktnetz repariert... Das meine ich, wo iD seine Schwächen hat...

Viele Grüße,

Sven
Sykes94 (2026-04-16 20:17:18+00:00): Hi, nein ich bin aus Calau. Sorry bei den changesets verstehe ich noch nicht ganz, wie ich erkenne, was da gemacht wurde. Aber ich hab heute auch mitbekommen, dass ich die Buslinien 35 und 38 durch den Kreisverkehr unterbrochen hatte. Hab ich dann vorerst an die voraussichtlich bis August gültige Umleitung angepasst. Die Fahrradroute ist mir leider entgangen, also danke dafür, falls es das war. Zu meiner Verteidigung ... das war heute mein erster Versuch :D

Grüße aus Calau
streckenkundler (2026-04-17 21:06:43+00:00): Hei,

...oooch alles Gut... Ich freue mich, südlich des Spreewaldes einen neuen Mapper zu haben... Ich selbst hatte gleich mit https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ angefangen, iD kenne ich nicht... Ich beobachte in meinen Jahren nur die eine oder andere Diskrepanz. Aber bleibe tiefenentspannt... 

Zu den Fahrradknotenpunktnetzen... Jahhh.. das ist schon etwas spezieller... 

Aber erst mal nach und nach einarbeiten... der Rest
kommt mit der Zeit!

Grüße aus Lübben,

Sven
Wildsharky (2026-04-17 12:11:53+00:00): Revert of 181382915
NeisBot (2026-04-16 10:15:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13734339808 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Print shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisBot (2026-04-16 10:15:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1428897635 v2 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/921225600 v6 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/8553058058 v5

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181405550
ajmat (2026-04-19 05:34:21+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 181523228
Warin61 (2026-04-17 10:35:27+00:00): HI
Relation 20455070 makes no sense. It only has one member and that has the role inner?????????
I have deleted the relation and put the grass tags on the way 1499852180
Jeffry Mardyo (2026-04-23 07:17:48+00:00): Q3129 is a tertiary road, gazetted as state road.
LakePeipus (2026-04-27 09:56:23+00:00): Hello, would you be able to share any resources that corroborate this road is secondary? I’m happy to restore the classification if so. Thanks!
Jeffry Mardyo (2026-04-27 10:15:41+00:00): My apologies, I suggest Q3129, Q824, and Q3002 be classified as tertiary roads since they serve to connect villages to the main road Q497. Ideally, any state road should have a minimum classification of tertiary according to OSM Malaysia Roads Tagging Wiki. The following is the source for the road code: Q824 (https://www.google.com/maps/@1.4153251,110.6831919,3a,15y,204.23h,86.1t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sDjIHjqS7pL5_-KDYTw1VcQ!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D3.9030481189271597%26panoid%3DDjIHjqS7pL5_-KDYTw1VcQ%26yaw%3D204.23076745467796!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDQyMi4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D), Q3002 (https://www.google.com/maps/@1.4086932,110.6698295,3a,15.3y,196.21h,80.14t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sBbNeEnExSGf86SPUTz3fYA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D9.86224457498902%26panoid%3DBbNeEnExSGf86SPUTz3fYA%26yaw%3D196.20697959561116!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDQyMi4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D) and Q3129 (https://www.google.com/maps/@1.4203244,110.6660249,3a,15y,225.92h,83.13t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sLsXc39wVColn66hbMgHfLQ!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D6.872975056130713%26panoid%3DLsXc39wVColn66hbMgHfLQ%26yaw%3D225.9193723470598!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDQyMi4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D).
LakePeipus (2026-04-28 09:28:17+00:00): The roads where the refs Q824and Q3002 were added, are already classified as tertiary, I’m happy to defer to your knowledge, if you think https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520865012 should be tertiary as well. Thanks!
Dimitar155 (2026-04-22 19:39:08+00:00): Здравей,

Участъка от главната линия наляво (посока Топливо) ще бъде възстановен. Вижда се и на видеото на Drone Reporter че е подготвена основата.

Поздрави,
Митко
NeisBot (2026-04-16 10:39:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13734384343 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Staffing agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
iandees (2026-04-16 14:53:02+00:00): Hi! It looks like the website URL on way/148336129 may have been copied from Google Maps (it contained Google tracking parameters). Please be careful not to copy information from Google into OpenStreetMap, as Google's data is copyrighted.
rarad74 (2026-04-16 11:06:08+00:00): Salut. Trebuie folosite diacritice la denumiri. Acum am corectat eu.
Andreimircearo (2026-04-16 11:16:51+00:00): Multumesc
Wildsharky (2026-04-21 03:21:42+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181536833
NeisBot (2026-04-16 11:00:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13734380632 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Gir Cow Farm"

#MapWithoutSpam
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-26 01:16:18+00:00): Removed promotional SEO spam description and fixed other malformed tags in changeset 183182268

www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183182268
Andrea Musuruane (2026-04-16 15:01:27+00:00): Il cambiamento di name sull'oggetto etichettato con information=board è errato. Il name è il nome che è presente sul cartello. Indipendentemente dal nome dell'orrido nelle varie lingue. Che probabilmente era quello che si voleva cambiare. Non sono stati inseriti i tag name:it quando il nome è bilingue. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181409234
Whepgup (2026-04-19 17:29:10+00:00): Ciao :) Scusa per il ritardo, ma sono ancora poco pratico qui su OSM. Ti riferisci al gouffre de Guillemore? Perché il nome sul cartello è in francese (cf. https://www.google.com/maps/place/Le+Gouffre+de+Guillemore/@45.6673996,7.8586836,3a,15y,124.79h,82.31t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1scAnDEeG3Wq4PhRxGhN_czg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D7.6875015392516985%26panoid%3DcAnDEeG3Wq4PhRxGhN_czg%26yaw%3D124.78702975537387!7i16384!8i8192!4m6!3m5!1s0x4788bd2b7f2dc9e1:0x923c7f6b252fbe5d!8m2!3d45.6674865!4d7.8585489!16s%2Fg%2F11f08npvty?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDQxNS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D), o non ho capito bene quello che volevi dire? Grazie in anticipo.
Andrea Musuruane (2026-04-19 18:29:41+00:00): Ciao. Non è quel cartello (tra l'altro su OSM evitiamo accuratamente di usare materiale di Google) ma un cartello informativo che si trova presso l'orrido: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9658883830 Ciao, Andrea
Whepgup (2026-04-20 08:41:23+00:00): Ciao, scusa, per essere sicuro di avere capito bene: ti ho mandato un link Google Maps, ma di un cartello che comunque esiste (avrei potuto mandarti una foto mia). Secondo quale regola è privilegiato il cartello che mi hai indicato tu? Tra l'altro, non riesco a visualizzarlo, come posso fare? Grazie in anticipo per la tua pazienza :)
Andrea Musuruane (2026-04-20 09:31:21+00:00): Il problema è su questo cartello: node/9658883830 E' un cartello differente. Lo si capisce sia dalla posizione (è da un'altra parte) che dal tagging (è un cartello informativo che riguarda la geologia e non un cartello di direzione). Nei cartelli informativi il name è il titolo del cartello stesso. Non va tradotto in altre lingue.
Andrea Musuruane (2026-04-20 09:38:49+00:00): Tu avresti dovuto modificare questo nodo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3543965057
eggie (2026-04-16 12:25:25+00:00): Dag DirkJan  De info heb ik samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode.
Je hebt anders twee identieke adressen. 
MVG
eggie
DwarfNebula_ (2026-04-16 12:48:07+00:00): @eggie, helaas kan in CoMaps momenteel de categorie momenteel niet veranderd worden, hierdoor kunnen adressen in NL niet aangepast worden. Dit is al gemeld bij CoMaps: https://codeberg.org/comaps/comaps/issues/1836#issuecomment-10362508
eggie (2026-04-16 13:42:01+00:00): @DwarfNebula Ahh thx. Weet jij of het met Organic wel kan?
Groet,
eggie
DwarfNebula_ (2026-04-16 14:06:16+00:00): Zo te zien niet. Wel mee bezig om toe te voegen, maar niet afgemaakt.
https://github.com/organicmaps/organicmaps/pull/10822
https://github.com/organicmaps/organicmaps/pull/10927
eggie (2026-04-16 14:12:46+00:00): Nou.. dat zijn geen succeseditors voor OSM Nederland.
Bedankt voor het uitzoeken.
dirkjan123 (2026-04-16 15:04:48+00:00): Ah excuus, ik had niet door dat het toevoegen van locaties via CoMaps meer werk voor jullie oplevert. Is er een gebruiksvriendelijk alternatief dat jullie aanraden? CoMaps en OrganicMaps dus niet?
eggie (2026-04-16 15:14:01+00:00): No problem... 
Volgens mij kan het met OsmAnd wel.
Daar heb ik, maar ik ben geen expert in al die apps die er allemaal bij zijn gekomen. 
Een e cht goed overzicht heb je eigenlijk alleen met een reguliere editor als Josm en iD.  Maar er zijn er meer.. Potlatch, Merkator. 
Hier de wiki met een overzicht van de mogelijkheden.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editors

Mapse en laat je niet ontmoedigen door wat kritiek,
eggie

Groet,
eggie
eggie (2026-04-16 15:16:09+00:00): Typo OsmAnd  Daar heb ik nog geen problemen gezien, maar veel wordt deze niet gebruikt....
Dodko (2026-04-21 14:02:39+00:00): adresa je už uložená v budove, nedáva sa duplicitne aj do POI
eggie (2026-04-16 12:27:10+00:00): Hier delen de instellingen een identiek adres.
Ik heb het compleet gemaakt door plaatsnaam toe te voegen. 
Gr eggie
m_fuhrmann (2026-04-16 14:45:15+00:00): Danke für den Fix!
Taya_S (2026-04-16 15:01:59+00:00): Your recent changesets have been reverted in 181418485 and 181418483.

Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20159
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 10:27:51+00:00): Reverted this changeset in which a SEO account vandalized an existing POI, removing most of its tags and adding a clearly nonsense name in changeset 184130076

https://osm.org/changeset/184130076
NeisBot (2026-04-16 12:16:23+00:00): Hello Osm Boane, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1499877174
https://osm.org/way/1499877175
https://osm.org/way/1499877172
https://osm.org/way/1499877173
https://osm.org/way/1499877170
https://osm.org/way/1499877171
https://osm.org/way/1499877168
https://osm.org/way/1499877169
https://osm.org/way/1499877167
https://osm.org/way/1499877176
...

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181410802
Fraxi (2026-04-16 12:24:00+00:00): Здравейте!
Можете да видите тази тема https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/136856/18
NeisBot (2026-04-16 12:24:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13734578364 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Law office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisBot (2026-04-16 12:30:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13734603517 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Medical aesthetics clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
RaphaelPasloin (2026-04-19 07:42:40+00:00): Hello,

No you haven't corrected anything here, you blindly copy the data from BestAddress without ground verification.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=938792339080901 

The French name was correct.

In that case we can add : official_name= that's not a problem, but you know the most important part of OSM is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ground_truth

Please refrain to "correcting" or copying data from this source , at this stage there is more than 127 street with errors in Bests address (and not counting square or made up name copyied from Urbis basemap) 

The verification process, by survey and using Mapilllary/panoramax is in progress by 3-4 mappers at the moment, and it's not usefull to try to "fix" without ground verification , the maturity of Brussels map is enouth to have the presomption that OSM data is more accurate than official and in case of doubt , survey is prefered and you are welcome to help at this manner.

Have a good day
Raphael
JhowieNitnek (2026-04-19 07:45:24+00:00): The street sign says it without "de la", I think we should follow that and not the memorial plaque
JhowieNitnek (2026-04-19 07:49:01+00:00): Also I have said it a lot in the past, your tone should be less agressive, the way you respond always feels like a personal attack. Please be mindfull of that
RaphaelPasloin (2026-04-19 08:05:41+00:00): This street sign : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1265560537308278 ? You have good eyes because i can read it, what's was your streetlevel imagery  source ?

In meantime the faulty street signs has been removed https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?s=fp;s2;p850e27d6-c7e0-419b-b448-646b2936527a;c50.89/0.00/45;m18.15/50.79995/4.365713;vd;bs;umetacatalog


Sorry if my tone looks like aggressive it's not , my english level skill is limited so i type trying my best.

I just relate fact.
Have a good day
Raphael
bxl-forever (2026-04-25 10:05:27+00:00): Hello, JhowieNitnek,

My experience when comparing OSM and UrbIS names is that OSM is often more correct.  Not always, of course, but in most cases yes.

It is always a good idea to inspect the history of OSM objects, sometimes you will find that it started with the official name, and it was corrected later, after users surveyed it locally.

From what I can see in the recent Panoramax images, the Dutch name should also be changed to: "Plein van de Republiek Argentinië", however unusual it may appear." https://api.panoramax.xyz/#focus=pic&pic=da9637df-38e4-40e4-a7ca-3150b641a6a2

This tagging scheme is usually the most appropriate option:

name=<name from ground truth>

official_name=<name known to UrbIS>

Both tags are searchable in Nominatim.


Same for this one, which I surveyed a few days ago.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181763350
eggie (2026-04-16 15:05:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   .. Alle begin is moeilijk.
Straatnaam = BuurToor  Waar komt die naam vandaan. Straatnaam is hier anders. 
Waarom bridge=low_water_crossing.
Er is toch geen brug hier, maar een duiker.
Een oprit wordt in de regel getagd met highway=service en service=driveway
bicycle=yes hoort hier niet als het priveterrein is access=private.

Ik pas even wat aan.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-16 15:07:55+00:00): Tagging aangepast. Wanneer je wilt dat het ook routeert voor bv bezorgdiensten kun je het beste access=permissive taggen.
MVG
eggie
Renevo (2026-04-16 17:56:06+00:00): Excuus. Straat is inderdaad onjuist. Is gewoon Weverskade. Er is inderdaad geen brug maar een duiker. 
Een oprit wordt in de regel getagd met highway=service en service=driveway
bicycle=yes hoort hier niet als het priveterrein is access=private.
Okay. Helder weer wat geleerd. 

Als je de aanpassingen kan doen graag

Mvg,
Rene
eggie (2026-04-16 18:34:49+00:00): No problem.. In het begin is alles abacadabra,
mapse
ratrun (2026-04-17 16:58:57+00:00): This import was of terrible quality as it was not merged with the already existing data. It lead to a bunch of unconnected ways on  https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=19.39309&lat=42.40135&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1

Due to the errors and as it seems this  import was not discussed beforehand, I reverted it with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181468297
mueschel (2026-04-19 10:09:49+00:00): It's not only this changeset but all 120 changesets...
TrickyFoxy (2026-04-22 22:09:40+00:00): К сожалению Яндекс.Карты для правок использовать нельзя
ilias_ (2026-04-16 15:10:05+00:00): Great work on your surveys!
pnd_ku (2026-04-21 13:42:22+00:00): Thanks!