piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
markalex- (2026-02-28 07:57:09+00:00): Don't know about Potlatch, never seen it even in screenshots.
But iD is definitely superior to JOSM for casual stuff - you just start editing, no need to download something, sync something, etc. 
And IT people are famously lazy))
dlegg73 (2026-02-26 21:54:41+00:00): Correction: Source used was Mapbox Satellite.
NeisBot (2026-02-26 21:57:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/6019795918 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Gîte La Logerie"
---
Bijvoorbeeld, een meer neutrale en feitelijke versie van je tekst kon zijn: "Gîte La Logerie"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-07 05:33:03+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179473552
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-02-26 22:03:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13603291040 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Floral shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-07 05:33:03+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179473553
(No visible changes after review)
burrscurr (2026-02-27 20:41:15+00:00): Hi Jonaes,

ich bin kein besonders erfahrener Straßenbahnsignalmapper, aber ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10567891097/history/2 nicht eigentlich g4 statt g2a (Erhöhung auf 30km/h statt Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzung auf 30 km/h)? Dann müsste allerdings auch vorher eine niedrigere Geschwindigkeit als die aktuell erfassten 40 km/h gelten (bin mir nicht sicher, ob das tatsächlich so ist).

VG
burrscurr
Jonaes (2026-02-27 21:11:09+00:00): Hi, als ich dort gestern lang bin, war es auf jeden Fall ein G2a: https://i.ibb.co/RpLkwYSK/IMG-20260226-135822.jpg
Mir wurde aber vorhin erzählt, dass man dort auf der Güntzstraße heute die Langsamfahrstellen geändert hat, insofern könnte es tatsächlich schon überholt sein...
VG Jannis
Jonaes (2026-02-28 17:20:33+00:00): Ich bin da eben noch mal lang gefahren, tatsächlich ist das jetzt ein G4 (davor sind jetzt 10 km/h). Hab die Änderungen eingetragen https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179179534
burrscurr (2026-02-28 19:46:25+00:00): Danke!
fortera_au (2026-02-26 22:43:54+00:00): Hi, building=detached has about 8x more usage than house=detached in Australia, it's probably better to stick with that vs building=house and house=detached.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179106110
NeisBot (2026-02-26 22:18:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13603211369 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Hardware store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-07 05:33:11+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179473557
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
eggie (2026-02-27 08:22:10+00:00): Dag Jack  De track zit aan de zuidzijde alleen vast aan de landuse=grass
Dat gaat nooit routeren.
Hoe is de toegang geregeld op deze veldweg?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-27 08:36:04+00:00): Het laatste stukje heb ik aangepast naar path .. informal=yes
Het zal vast niet de bedoeling zijn dat hier regulier autoverkeer overgaat.
tracktype=grade5 toegevoegd surface=ground
mueschel (2026-02-27 17:59:26+00:00): Please don't just dump data from other sources into OSM!
If you want to import data, please read and follow our import guidelines:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
NeisBot (2026-02-26 22:21:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/5321287865 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cafe"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-07 05:33:11+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179473560
(No visible changes after review)
eggie (2026-02-26 22:56:45+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Bedankt voor je bijdragen.
Een roc wordt in dr regel getagd met amenity=college.. dus niet school.

Mvg,
eggie
superoci (2026-02-26 23:08:10+00:00): Lumion is een VO, niet een ROC (lumion.amsterdam is de website)
eggie (2026-02-26 23:09:32+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk..
Mayuri008 (2026-02-26 22:40:33+00:00): Good
NeisBot (2026-02-26 22:30:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13603529389 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Farm and machine shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-07 05:33:13+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179473562
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-02-26 22:36:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13603984265 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Burger restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-07 05:33:16+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179473565
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-02-26 22:42:53+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13603556764 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "RV park"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-07 05:33:18+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179473567
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Frans S (2026-02-27 15:52:08+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. I have reviewed your mappings. Good work.
When you map a road on the same track, please connect it to the already mapped path and check which tag to use here.
Path or unclassified highway
Best regards
AngelB (2026-02-27 17:47:38+00:00): Thanks
NeisBot (2026-02-26 22:48:53+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13603604521 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Flower shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-07 05:33:20+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179473571
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-02-26 23:00:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 21 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/710716927 v6 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1011245209 v2 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/32432476 v2 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/9329829517 v2
https://osm.org/node/9329829533 v2
https://osm.org/node/364697076 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179107492
BCNorwich (2026-02-27 07:46:02+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

My apologies if I'm wrong, but I don't think you would as yet have the experience to find and correct the problems mentioned by NeisBot above. Thus I've made the corrections.

Regards Bernard.
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-27 07:49:54+00:00): Thanks Bernard
grzegorz75jan (2026-03-08 18:07:22+00:00): Zwróć uwagę jak dodajesz adresy a dodajesz je błędnie.
Do tej edycji https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178283982 otrzymałeś trzy komentarze od bota który sprawdza poprawność adresów i albo tego nie przeczytałeś lub zignorowałeś.

W tej edycji dodałeś Dino ponownie z błędnym adresem.

Przeczytaj sekcję "tagowanie w Polsce" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*
Następnie popraw po sobie i odpowiadaj na komentarze.
BCNorwich (2026-02-27 07:54:48+00:00): Hi, I've removed the leisure=fitness_centre tag from the building as it's main use is apartments. You are correct to place the fitness_centre POI within the building outline, as it's one of the building's many uses.

Regards Bernard.
NeisBot (2026-02-26 23:09:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 27 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/48369931 v7 | 14 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1096380415 v1 | 13 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/614400049 v5

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179107634
NeisReview (2026-03-07 05:33:26+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179111104
eggie (2026-02-27 09:47:21+00:00): Saf siperoci,

De info heb ik samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode.

Waar komt deze note= vandaan?
future name: "ROC ASA West, locatie Vlaardingenlaan"
Dit was de reden van mijn opmerking. 
MVG
eggie
superoci (2026-02-27 09:50:54+00:00): Ja, ik snap het ook niet waar die note vandaan komt, aangezien ze de school niet gaat veranderen in een ROC.
eggie (2026-02-27 09:53:35+00:00): Dan kan die regel vast wel weg. Dat geeft nu alleen maar verwarring.
Mapse
superoci (2026-02-27 09:59:38+00:00): Mee eens, het is verwarrend en incorrect.
eggie (2026-02-27 14:57:28+00:00): note verwijderd
superoci (2026-02-27 18:11:36+00:00): Bedankt!
TrickyFoxy (2026-03-04 10:06:19+00:00): Здесь действительно что-то продают или это просто ферма?
Frans S (2026-02-27 15:41:39+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179108261
MappingMore (2026-03-01 03:12:12+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179193548
watmildon (2026-02-27 22:18:56+00:00): Hello Alan!

I would encourage you to slow down a bit as a lot of these are quite rough or incorrect... ex: many seem to be inentical copy/pasted kidney bean even when that's not reflective of what's actually there.

You're running the risk of all of this being reverted which is a shame for all parties.

Matt
Alan Bragg (2026-03-01 14:50:54+00:00): Thank for the comment. The estimated 390,000 pools in the Phoenix area are of two common types: geometrical and free form. Kidney shaped pools are common. I was using several representative shapes and re-sizing and orienting them to get a good approximation. But, I'll will review them and make adjustments. I don't map pools as nodes because they are not rendered and only useful for statistics. At present there about 100,000 pool nodes in Phoenix (10.7 million in the USA).
Frans S (2026-02-27 15:14:42+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Please do not connect nodes of buildings to other buildings.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179108508
VictorIE (2026-04-03 01:04:43+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1483654310/

The Saint Patrick's Cathedral has achieved lift-off and is making its way to space: https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=53.3394045&lon=-6.2722799&zoom=19&camera.phi=159.179 :D

The problem seems to be here:
height=43
min_height=25
roof:height=90

Am I correct in thinking only two of these should be set?

Wikipedia suggests overall height is 	66-69 metres.
DIrish (2026-04-03 12:01:35+00:00): Thank you for your uphelpful comment. The F4 renderer has an issue with certain tag types- try a different renderer. 

If you have a proper source of information on the spire height - let me know. I will not be updating this based on Wikipedia or any other unverified (and possibly copyrighted) information. 

Maybe you could try fixing it yourself?!
Yunkers (2026-03-03 10:22:33+00:00): Zrobiłeś dość sporą liczbę drzew o nazwie "Aleja im. Adama Mickiewicza". Nie wydaje mi się żeby drzewo było aleją ani że każde jedno drzewo ma taką nazwę. Więc to będzie do poprawki.
Yog Sot (2026-04-03 22:50:43+00:00): te aleje sukcesywnie są do naprawy przez przeniesienie nazwy na np obszar, ale sa braki w wytycznych, wiec bywa cięzko
Grass-snake (2026-03-05 20:26:39+00:00): Здравствуйте.
1. Зачем Вы восстанавливаете названия с указанием участков (уч.*)?
2. Зачем добавляете тег embankment=yes? Выборочно посмотрел, ничего похожего на насыпь или возвышение не нашёл.
Natfoot (2026-03-13 23:47:03+00:00): thanks for fixing it.
silversurfer83 (2026-03-01 10:04:20+00:00): This looks like an undiscussed import and the source is not accessible without log in. Please explain.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179109414
TheSwavu (2026-02-27 03:24:15+00:00): Hello,

It is very unlikely that a private catholic school is operated by the NSW Government.

I have fixed this one.

Happy mapping.
knarlyhurricane (2026-02-27 04:50:56+00:00): thanks for that, mate.
how come you removed the addr:postcode, addr:state, addr:suburb fields?
fortera_au (2026-03-01 22:32:13+00:00): They're not needed in Australia, as we have full mapping of those as relations and those are used when geocoding.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179110148
Rogoyski (2026-03-01 21:46:56+00:00): Preferowane jest pozostawienie punktu z prefixem 'disused' np. 'disused:amenity=restaurant'. W ten sposób użytkownicy aplikacji StreetComplete czy EveryDoor będą widzieli, że należy sprawdzić, co nowego się w tym miejscu pojawiło.
toster234 (2026-03-02 13:09:26+00:00): @Rogoyski dzięki za cynk, że ta apka tak umie ;)
FajrAl (2026-02-27 06:51:41+00:00): Halo, selamat datang di OSM. Untuk cara memetakan yang benar, silakan ikuti tutorial interaktifnya, ya!
aighes (2026-02-27 22:11:33+00:00): Hey PowerMapper77,
I assume the data you added with this (and the once for the other states) was an import and you haven't reviewed them one by one? If so, such imports need to follow the Import Guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Did you started the required discussion ahead of your import? If not, I suggest to start such kind of discussion as soon as possible and stop any further imports. 

I believe most of the "names" you added in name might be not actual names, but rather the operator?
woodpeck (2026-03-02 09:21:25+00:00): Dear PowerMapper77, I see that after the above was pointed out to you, you have continued to import substations without following the import process. I have therefore deleted all substations that you have imported. Please discuss the matter on the community forum and give other community members the chance to chime in on your plans - what data source are you planning to use, how exactly will you be populating OSM tags from that source, how will you deal with duplicates, etc.etc; then if there's community buy-in you may commence with your import. 

I recognize some work, including manual corrections, has already gone into this but I don't think that you've got everything right, most specifically the "name" tag which you seem to have not been populating correctly. The work you have already done could be salvaged (by reverting my deletion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179243989)  but only *after* you have properly followed the import guidelines.
Udarian (2026-02-27 02:29:53+00:00): what is your source for the Wendy's being closed?

Happy mapping,
Udar.
user_23623664 (2026-02-27 12:15:46+00:00): Answer: There was not A source. There were three. Note left by user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/NikoNomas AND website that was currently on location was direct to former location and did work anymore AND I searched again on https://order.wendys.com/location?lang=en_US  Why do you ask? Do you think it's open?
user_23623664 (2026-02-27 12:17:26+00:00): This does assume the address that was present on the building at time of edit was correct.
Udarian (2026-02-27 15:40:56+00:00): I asked because your changeset comment didn't indicate how you figured out the Wendy's had closed and as you contribute business changes throughout the US somewhat randomly I didn't feel it was a safe assumption to make that you are familiar with the area and thus would know about this from local knowledge or survey. So I felt it was important to ensure the sources used where OSM license compliant. Based on your response it seems like everything is ok, I was jut being vigilant, trying to make sure the data quality in Miami Dade County remains as high as possible. As a note if you had added to your comment something like "based on OSM notes and companies website" I probably wouldn't have left the initial comment as I could have inferred the source from that.
As for the addresses, they were imported around 2017-2018 from an official county source, they tend to be relatively good but can be stale or missing in some areas where there have been changes since then, especially around construction that has happened since then. 

Happy Mapping,
Udar.
user_23623664 (2026-02-28 04:05:06+00:00): I am random since I pull from here https://notesreview.org/ -- Closed businesses are often easy to help with since I can research.  Will try to remember to write more in comments
Udarian (2026-02-27 17:07:34+00:00): can you please take another look at where ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39349857 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11113189 meet as the angle they come together at seems rather sharp and thus unlikely, If you send me a screen shot of the area with the imagery you did this on I would be glad to make any necessary changes my self. As a note the latest imagery available in iD is "Esri World Imagery", though it is somewhat out of date at this point, it has some of these details in it to some degree though.

Happy Mapping,
Udar.
carlosguerrero_lyft (2026-03-02 16:29:57+00:00): Hi, Udarian!

My name is Carlos, and I’m part of the OSM team here at Lyft. Thank you for reaching out regarding these edits.
To ensure accuracy, we utilized Lyft’s internal tools, including street-level imagery and telemetry data, to verify the ground reality. I’ve attached screenshots of the internal imagery and telemetry data as a reference to show the current alignment.
(https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eWsiRgBj-ExD6vYvLl1NPgztFjIMt0eh/view?usp=sharing)
(https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HdY_M8YIBINd1cXNB8dg3SoUZl8wAqV3/view?usp=sharing)
We really appreciate your diligence in keeping the map updated! Please feel free to make any additional improvements you think would benefit the area.

Best regards, Carlos.
Glassman (2026-02-28 02:23:48+00:00): You tagged the way as a track, which implies used by 4WD vehicles. highway=path is what we typically call a trail. Just checking to make sure you got the right type of way.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179110817
pantufla (2026-03-24 04:15:29+00:00): Hola, cuál es el motivo para borrar la localidad de El Cuño?
cubbe8 (2026-02-27 03:59:07+00:00): Hello

The edits you are making to sidewalks are not correct. You are messing up the sidewalk and crossing alignment and removing surface tags from sidewalks and crosswalks. Additionally several of your change sets over the past few days are aligning sidewalks with outdated imagery as they have been recently reconstructed and confined with survey. Also many of these edits are unnecessary.