piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2026-01-08 21:13:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  De info van de bso heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode.
De fietsenstalling ligt midden op de rijbaan. Klopt dat wel?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-01-08 21:17:22+00:00): De fietsenstalling heb ik teruggeplaatst..
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=177000360

MVG
eggie
mueschel (2026-01-10 12:19:22+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM!
You have to make sure that you only use data from sources that are licensed to be used for OSM. google does not allow to use its data for OSM, so I had to revert these edits.
NeisBot (2026-01-09 06:52:37+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12845193733 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "InnerCleanse Wellness Center in Goshen IN"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 10:54:11+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177368037
CRCulver (2026-02-02 21:17:34+00:00): Stop removing shop=yes tags from instances of amenity=fuel. This is a common tagging on these POIs, and lets e.g. cyclists know that they can enjoy a cold drink. If you are using software that flags these as a bug, it is a false positive.

I have already warned you about this before. Do I need to escalate to the DWG?
ViewStreet (2026-02-02 21:43:12+00:00): Watch your mouth.
I didn't change it.
CRCulver (2026-02-02 21:54:28+00:00): Here is the history of the node where you can see that you did, in fact, change it:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9164494129/history

Also, when another user points out that you are making (repeated) tagging errors, it is not appropriate for you to respond with "Watch your mouth". On OSM one should expect criticism of one’s edits once in a while.
ViewStreet (2026-02-02 22:52:28+00:00): I didn't get bother with fuel stations, do you understand?
Specially with removing shop tag. Understood yes or no?
History may include many changes that I didn't make.
CRCulver (2026-02-03 10:22:20+00:00): The History view is reliable and it shows that you, user ViewStreet, removed that tag. If you think that you have not been making such edits intentionally, then you may be using your editor software incorrectly and I ask you to be more careful in future.
ViewStreet (2026-02-03 10:35:58+00:00): 1st. Its the first time I got message from you.
2nd. I didn't change anything about fuel station. Except if the ID editor got your edit as mistake and I just applied the correction.
3rd. If you want to enter a shop on the fuel station, better make a new pin beside the fuel station. It is the same like marking a super market as a fuel station, since some of them have fuel pumps. It ruins the tags.
4th. Don't threaten me again.
CRCulver (2026-02-03 10:43:17+00:00): "Its the first time I got message from you."

I complained to you about this in October of last year under changeset 173558142:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173558142

"Except if the ID editor got your edit as mistake and I just applied the correction."

If ID said that (did it?), then it is a false positive. 

"If you want to enter a shop on the fuel station, better make a new pin beside the fuel station."

shop= tags on amenity=fuel are a standard tagging (under the principle “One feature, one OSM element”).

"Don't threaten me again."

Telling you that I will escalate to DWG if your edits continue to remove surveyed data is not a threat, it is the standard working procedure here. OSM is a community, we all monitor each other’s edits. Please stop being hostile to changeset comments.
ViewStreet (2026-02-03 11:23:50+00:00): Do a suggestion to the develooers of  ID editor, if you think you have right, so that shop & amenity can work together without conflicts.
You have better use ID editor too, so that to avoid bugs of JOSM Editor.
CRCulver (2026-02-03 11:53:50+00:00): If ID removed tags, then it would be worth reporting to its developers as a bug, because usage of shop= tags on instances of amenity=fuel is standard tagging and has been documented at the OSM Wiki for many years. But what I want to ascertain is whether ID did, in fact, delete those tags on its own, and your defensive attitude and failure to explain exactly what happened is unhelpful.

You are mistaken if you think that JOSM is some kind of buggy editor inferior to ID. Both editors have different use cases and are widely used by the OSM community.
hoserab (2026-01-08 23:50:44+00:00): Hello dlh,

May I ask where you found an address for this venue of "4th Street and 1st Avenue SW"? I ask because that's not really a valid address: there is no intersection of 4th and 1st (anymore; there was decades ago), and the 'virtual' intersection point is about 375 metres southeast of here.
dlh28 (2026-01-11 20:30:44+00:00): Hello hoserab,

I just used the address I found for Prince's Island Park on the City of Calgary website (https://www.calgary.ca/parks/princes-island-park.html).

I needed to add an address on Wikidata in order to ingest it as a venue in the Artsdata knowledge graph, but if it's not a valid address, feel free to remove it from OSM.
hoserab (2026-02-06 18:06:11+00:00): Thanks for replying! (And apologies for this belated reply.) It appears the overarching Prince's Island Park way was also appended with this address, probably from the same source. I have no idea why the City website would add this address, but it really isn't valid. As such I'm going to delete it from the OSM data.

Thanks again!
Aim311_ (2026-01-11 22:08:40+00:00): Nazwa tego aquaparku to "Tarnowskie Termy" https://tarnowskie-termy.pl/
Z dwóch nazw, które widziałeś, którą zostawiłeś?
𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ (2026-01-11 22:11:50+00:00): Zostawiłem nazwę na obszarze landuse, usunąłem z budynku.
Aim311_ (2026-01-11 23:03:00+00:00): ok
toftol (2026-01-09 01:38:39+00:00): gracias de comprobar lo que es esta institucion (me parece algo para las familias y los niños)
Rainero (2026-03-21 22:49:06+00:00): Revert mit changeset/180229102
(unzulässige Quelle)
ElliottPlack (2026-07-04 18:07:21+00:00): thanks
NeisBot (2026-01-09 06:52:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13427274210 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Garibaldi Mexican Bar and Grill in Hartford"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 10:58:22+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177368221
(Deleted leftovers after several edits)
NeisBot (2026-01-09 06:52:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13427500625 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tattoo shop in Amherst NH"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 10:54:15+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177368040
Yog Sot (2026-01-09 23:45:41+00:00): że juz na pewno postawili znaki pionowe? ;]
czy dalej sa wyłącznie poziome? ;]
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-25 03:46:12+00:00): DWG revert - apparent undiscussed import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177668049
NeisBot (2026-01-09 06:52:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/680497550 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Davanzali producer of wooden doors in Tarnow"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i fakticzna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Davanzali producent drzwi drewnianych w Tarnowie"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 10:54:16+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177368041
mueschel (2026-01-11 09:39:05+00:00): Hi,
please check the defibrillators you added. The proper tag is  "emergency=defibrillator", not "emergency:defibrillator=yes"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=defibrillator
Johand199 (2026-01-11 21:33:29+00:00): Ah thanks for noticing! Copy paste mistake by me 

I’ll add it to my todo to fix. At work so won’t be able to have a look until later tomorrow
Johand199 (2026-01-11 21:55:00+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177114830 :D
NeisBot (2026-01-09 06:52:54+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13421771435 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bridal shop in Richmond KY"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 10:54:16+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177368043
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-25 03:46:13+00:00): DWG revert - apparent undiscussed import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177668049
NeisBot (2026-01-09 06:52:57+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/1581915169 v16

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bubble tea store in Falls Church VA"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 10:54:17+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177368044
Kris74M (2026-01-22 20:43:44+00:00): Witaj. Czy na pewno w tym miejscu znajduje się przystanek autobusowy?
RafaBoski (2026-01-22 20:53:16+00:00): Tak, znajduje się. Dwa tygodnie temu z niego odjeżdżałem autobusem.
Kris74M (2026-01-23 01:00:24+00:00): a na placu targowym jest jeszcze przystanek?
RafaBoski (2026-01-23 21:31:36+00:00): Właśnie nie ma. Miałem go usunąć, ale kompletnie mi to wyleciało z głowy...
syncronic (2026-01-09 08:16:00+00:00): Dus hast den Punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/703482980 weit verschoben und den Punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/635129168 gelöscht. Ich nehme an, das war ein Versehen.
eggie (2026-01-09 08:44:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
rskedgell (2026-01-09 00:18:38+00:00): (Review requested}

Welcome to OpenStreetMmap and thanks for improving your local area.

There's one thing which you've added which might be better described using a different tag, which is the small park https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1465426695 . It's already within a park ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/382655893 ) and looking at the aerial imagery, might leisure=pitch be a better fit?
NeisBot (2026-01-09 06:52:58+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1054215081 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mexican restaurant in Charlottesville VA"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 10:54:18+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177368045
zorothepirate (2026-01-08 22:36:55+00:00): this is actually PR6 BRG Trilho das Candeias
NeisBot (2026-01-09 06:53:00+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13435267424 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Barber shop in Tinley Park IL"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 10:54:18+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177368047
NeisBot (2026-01-09 06:53:01+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13440612404 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Furniture and gift shop in Llano TX"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 10:54:18+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177368048
yelisey90 (2026-01-09 21:52:52+00:00): Isn't the lift gate *behind* the regular gate, which is open at some times but closed at others?
https://yandex.com.ge/maps/-/CLdIVQMr
Jk488 (2026-01-09 22:47:32+00:00): Oh that's right, I'll fix it
Eros93 (2026-01-08 22:44:55+00:00): I need to move via dell'Agricoltura on the east side of the SP2 Var. But not the beginnig and the end: there are new beginning and new end, I just created them. Problem: Ciclabile Valchiavenna https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6588150#map=14/46.18402/9.43820&layers=G now runs on top of the embankment, no longer on via dell'Agricoltura. At this moment I'm not able to move this.
Eros93 (2026-01-08 23:03:00+00:00): I also don't understand how should I mark the structure:
pista ciclabile is on top of the embankment, but also the track is on top of the embankmente but on a lower height. Maybe is wrong "two_sided" for both road.

Now I don't have yet informations about what they did with this, so I left it as it was even if now it's wrong.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88222071
ratrun (2026-01-09 05:19:25+00:00): Now I moved via dell'Agricoltura inlcuding the relation to the east as requested. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177009350#map=14/46.26337/9.39216.

Please check especially https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1465503108#map=19/46.244186/9.405848 where the way crosses the SP2 Var. Is this a tunnel? Or is it a crossing?

Sorry, I'm also not familiar with the "embarkment" tag. Anyway, as the value "two_sided" is not contained in the wiki description I would change its value "yes", see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:embankment. If there two separated tracks run in parallel on this embarkment then the current mapping as separate ways is correct.

What about this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1465429402. Given its name "Pista ciclabile Cristoforo Colombo" and its tagging this way should be better part of the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6588150#map=16/46.25786/9.39903 . This currently looks strange. Can you please check?
Eros93 (2026-01-09 17:00:15+00:00): Via dell'agricoltura  doesn't cross SP2 Var. No road crosses SP2 Var, except the cycle path that I created near the northern roundabot.
If you can move ciclabile valchiavenna relation on the new path i can correct via dell'agricoltura myself.
Anyway I'll try to explain. Via dell'Agricoltura now starts from via Zocchi here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1465429398 then runs next to the SP2 Var like this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1465429406 .

This https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1465503107 still exists but it's not connected with the new via dell'Agricoltura.


For this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1465429402, if I undestood, is correct what you say, but I'm not able at all to work with relations.
This https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1465429406 shoudn't be part of the Ciclabile Valchiavenna relation. 
Instead this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1465429402 is part of Ciclabile Valchiavenna.
Pista ciclabile Cristoforo Colombo  is a name like via Giumello (name of the road) in Novate Mezzola that is also part of the relation Ciclabile Valchiavenna.
ratrun (2026-01-09 17:56:19+00:00): Now I moved the cycle route relation to 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1465429402

This is the changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177035869#map=14/46.24162/9.41226

This way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1465429400#map=19/46.243007/9.407730 currently just ends without connectivity, something need to be done here.

I hope that I understood everything right, please check everything again.
Eros93 (2026-01-09 18:24:08+00:00): Perfect, I made some changes to fix via dell'Agricoltura: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177036602

Everithing seems correct, further refinements need further surveys. But the situation for me is now more than acceptable.

Thanks for your precious help, without help I would not have been able to do it.
ilias_ (2026-01-09 02:43:24+00:00): I'm pretty sure the correct tag is railway:preferred_direction not just preferred_direction, you're like the only one that's using this tag. See https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=preferred_direction
kaelon141 (2026-01-09 20:48:43+00:00): Oops, yep I didn't notice the railway: prefix on that tag in the wiki docs. I'll fix it now, thanks for the comment.
NeisBot (2026-01-09 06:53:03+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13440226912 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Insurance agency in Pendleton Indiana"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 10:58:22+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177368223
gscholz (2026-01-18 08:15:21+00:00): Hi zorothepirate,
your recent edits have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-8.40838&lat=41.54397&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

This kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?

Kind regards
Guido
NeisBot (2026-01-09 06:53:05+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13440770485 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Massage practice"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Massagepraxis"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 10:58:46+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177368238
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-09 16:09:57+00:00): It's possible to edit more than one object at a time when making changes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177004858
sykul (2026-01-09 15:27:08+00:00): Bonjour. Faut-il vraiment couper la route à cet endroit ? D'après les images satellites, la route est continue et praticable s'il n'y avait pas de barrière. Il serait peut-être plus réaliste de la rétablir et d'ajouter la barrière comme un nœud.

Hello. Should one really disconnect the road here? I get the impression from satellite imagery that the road is connected here, and could be driven if there were no barrier. It might be more true-to-life to reconnect the road and add the barrier as a node.
cb13850 (2026-01-10 08:25:58+00:00): bonjour
effectivement, la route existe bien mais elle n'est praticable qu'à pied ou à vélo, les véhicules à moteur ne peuvent pas passer il y a une barrière car les deux voies chemin du jas/chemin lou valadet sont privées.
sykul (2026-01-10 15:57:26+00:00): Très bien. Ça semble correct maintenant.
Bonne journée.
stillhart (2026-02-13 20:10:45+00:00): ✨ supercharger wunderschön genau gemappt
Michi (2026-02-14 00:13:57+00:00): Danke! Ich habe eben noch die Ausfahrt vervollständigt und den Mülleimer hinzugefügt. 😊
dmjab13 (2026-01-14 18:29:37+00:00): why did you edit a single place in Ohio alongside the Jersey edits in this changeset
CurlingMan13 (2026-01-14 18:53:03+00:00): Guess I forgot to upload the changeset before changing locations.  Or I wasn't aware I made an edit before changing locations.

Couldn't tell ya.  I know, large bbox and all.