piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tekim (2024-05-02 23:25:06+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Thanks for updating the information about what I assume is your business.  I see you cited Google Maps as one of your sources.  When editing OpenStreetMap we are not allowed to use (copy from, cite as a source, use as a reference, use for validation) Google Maps due to Google's terms of Service.  You are free to redo the edit using only acceptable sources, which could include your personal knowledge, and/or your business' website.  Thanks for your understanding
tekim (2024-05-02 23:25:24+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150814808
cuzi (2024-04-30 23:14:28+00:00): Si la laguna todavía está ahí en la época lluviosa, no es necesario quitarla. Puedes usar "seasonal=yes" para marcar que a veces está seca.
cuzi (2024-07-18 09:40:37+00:00): Si lo deseas, puedo revertir la eliminación.
CasperGeo (2024-07-17 08:03:12+00:00): please try to be more complete when mapping individual buildings / Press Q to square buildings / dont connect buildings nodes together.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150718135
luiswoo (2024-04-30 20:13:53+00:00): Почему удалён полигон place https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/405781459/history хутора Нижнекольцов?
user_12458445 (2024-05-04 06:06:41+00:00): будем пересоздавать - некорректно сделан по границам, т.к контур восстановлен - в далнейшем я его скорректирую
luiswoo (2024-05-04 14:50:25+00:00): А сейчас https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150866205 https://disk.yandex.ru/i/bevPszD_fU80tQ — типа корректно, да? Этот контур был импортирован из кадастра. 
В osm настолько не любят необоснованное удаление объектов, что есть минимум два способа этого не делать: а. замена геометрии (выделить через contrl старый и новый объект; ctrl-shift-G); б. уточнение геометрии W (по умолчанию переносит ближайшую точку, с зажатым shift — добавление новых точек, с жатым alt — удаление старых точек).
luiswoo (2024-05-04 15:01:54+00:00): Способы добавление слоёв кадастра и адресов:
https://github.com/Grass-snake-89/pkk-cache
https://github.com/micronull/JOSM-Russia-address-helper-plugin
user_12458445 (2024-05-05 11:00:16+00:00): не совсем понятно как работает способы добавления адресного слоя - я его вручную пишу. А эти скрипты че то не понятно совсем че надо делать с ними
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-23 15:17:58+00:00): Good and accurate mapping.#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150718290
KevinOs (2024-05-01 00:14:31+00:00): Buddy, it's getting beyond frustrating that you keep injecting your own fantasy edits on a never ending supply of new accounts.  I tried to help, you refused to update, i fixed up your changes and now you revert them back. chill out, 

object:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70647322

original https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150518077
my fix:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150643367

please either repair your error or post support that they have changed with store name. thanks
KevinOs (2024-05-01 00:25:43+00:00): Also looks like you changed all the other locations in the Metro, please correct those as well.
Viajero Perdido (2024-05-01 02:47:45+00:00): Superstore names have not changed to Loblaws.  See the link on the OSM objects.  I shop there regularly and would notice this.
Viajero Perdido (2024-05-01 02:49:35+00:00): Also, it's not "Fast" Gas.  https://www.fasgasplus.ca/
Ewrt1 (2024-05-01 03:26:40+00:00): And, they changed the Superstore to Loblaws again
DaveF (2024-05-01 08:49:47+00:00): Hi
There is already a railway station.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6666423298

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11869553283
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-23 15:17:17+00:00): Good and accurately mapped. keep contributing #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150718890
RobertTBS (2024-05-03 03:56:05+00:00): Hello, I hope you realize that OpenStreetMap is for only real infrastructure taken most often from satellite and aerial photography. The edits you are making are not from any real sources, and appear to be intentional vandalism. This is not beneficial, and it takes other's time to fix. Please refrain from doing this in the future.
eggie (2024-04-30 17:47:32+00:00): Aardig gelukt. Ik heb de mulipolygonen verwijderd. Water en landuse staat nu gewoon op de polygonen. 

Mapse
eggie
Melvin Snijders (2024-04-30 17:53:47+00:00): Super, bedankt voor je hulp!
tekim (2024-04-30 19:06:44+00:00): removing a fake edit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150723372
tekim (2024-04-30 19:04:49+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Thanks for your edits to the map, we appreciate it.  In OpenStreetMap we like to see buildings drawn with 90-degree corners (unless the building is a different shape, such as a circle - which is not the case here).  My suggestion would be to zoom in very close when editing so you can see a lot of detail, and slow down.  It is better to have a few high quality buildings, rather than a lot of low-quality buildings.  You can use the "Square" function in the iD editor to make 90-degree corners, but you have to first draw the building so that the corners are reasonably close to 90 degrees.  

Happy Mapping!
tekim (2024-04-30 17:50:25+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Thanks for your edits to the map.  In OpenStreetMap we like to see buildings mapped with 90-degree corners (unless they are a different shape, such as a circle - which is not the case here).  My suggestion would be to zoom in closer when mapping and take your time.  It is better to have a few high quality buildings rather than a lot of lesser quality buildings.  Happy Mapping!
tekim (2024-04-30 17:47:32+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Thanks for your edits.  In OpenStreetMap you should map buildings with 90-degree corners (unless in reality they are a different shape, such as a circle - which is not the case here).   My suggestion would be to zoom in closer when mapping and take your time.  It is better to have a few high-quality buildings rather than a lot of messy buildings.   Happy Mapping!
MxxCon (2024-05-03 19:11:58+00:00): Hello.
Could you please provide some supporting evidence that this is the name of this feature?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150719945
pavvv (2024-10-12 10:49:17+00:00): Dla kogo ta droga? Dla tych z Ząbkowic, Dzierżoniowa, itp. jadących na Nysę jest DW382. Nikt jadący przez Bardo nie skręca na Rondzie Lwowskim na Nysę, natomiast trasa przez Wyspiańskiego na DK33 jest nawet wskazywana przez znaki i funkcjonuje jako alternatywa do obwodnicy Kłodzka.
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-12 05:16:20+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150720757
Minh Nguyen (2024-05-02 22:30:36+00:00): Are you sure these are boardwalks? They look more like covered walkways in aerial imagery. There’s an optional Covered field you can enable in the menu. I went ahead and changed it to a covered walkway in changeset 150813879.
Pinstall (2024-05-02 23:03:04+00:00): Covered walkways is more accurate. Thank you
Violaine_Do (2024-12-03 21:45:40+00:00): hi rowcherry row, beware that we often have 2 roads very close and separated by a wall... this is normal :(
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150720934
rowcherryrow (2024-12-03 23:46:21+00:00): Hi Violaine_Do, initially, I didn't see the wall separating the two roads. However, after a closer look using both aerial imagery and Mapillary, I can now confirm that there are indeed two distinct roads here, rather than one. As you pointed out, this type of road configuration is common in French Polynesia, so I'll be more careful in the future when assessing similar setups. Thanks for your input!
Violaine_Do (2024-12-03 23:52:56+00:00): Thks
Geo-Tobi (2025-04-06 05:39:37+00:00): Hi, du hast hier ein ziemliches Wirrwarr verursacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/479473054
HW=footway mit bicycle=designated, und zudem ist das Verkehrszeichen mit Fußweg plus Rad frei getagged. Da passt nichts mehr zusammen. Kannst du das bitte zeitnah korrigieren? Sonst mache ich deinen Änderungssatz rückgängig. Grüße
Geo-Tobi (2025-04-06 05:43:25+00:00): Anmerkung: falls du unsicher bist, wie Verkehrszeichen zu mappen sind, nutze bitte das sehr Vz-Tool https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs , welches insbesondere für Anfänger äußerst hilfreich ist.
Wanderer_und_Radfahrer_Anton (2025-04-06 08:56:13+00:00): Hallo Geo-Tobi,
ich habe den Weg bei Werdum nun korrigiert, habe bicycle=yes gesetzt.
Ob die Beschilderung noch aktuell ist weiß ich aber leider nicht, danke für den Hinweis.

Anton
Geo-Tobi (2025-04-06 09:51:28+00:00): 👍
miluethi (2024-04-30 18:12:13+00:00): Hi Aswini,

I noticed your are adding buildings in Nicaragua through the HotOSM task manager. 

Please square out building shapes whenever possible. Select a building shape and press the "Q" key on the iD Editor - that's all.

The shapes look much better ;-)

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
Michael
MarinoBM (2024-05-19 00:39:17+00:00): Algo ha pasado para que desaparezca el parque de bomberos.
Revierto los cambios.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151514403
Harald Hartmann (2024-05-01 07:11:42+00:00): Hallo Burggeist1, wenn du schon diverse amenity=shelter in leisure		picnic_table umtaggst, dann bitte entferne auch shelter_type=picnic_table und füge ein covered=yes hinzu, weil ich gehe davon aus, dass die Picknicktische überdacht sind und so weiterhin vor Regen schützen, richtig?
flohoff (2024-04-30 20:23:07+00:00): Moin,
hast du eine idee wie lange die dauern?

Flo
Muhmaker (2024-05-01 05:06:03+00:00): https://www.bielefeld01.de/fachdaten/baustellen/Baustellen/Dokumente/00014000/0x0140CF/index.htm 
sagt Ende Januar 2025 für die gesamte Maßnahme. Die einzelnen Abschnitte werden dort momentan nicht erwähnt.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2025-03-30 17:43:03+00:00): Duplicate item: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11818780715

Already existing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97507956
Robin On Wheels (2025-03-31 12:01:21+00:00): Hey I changed all accessibility info from the node to the existing way. Thanks for spotting it
Vaidotas (2024-08-31 11:03:26+00:00): Building a bus route with iD (in-browser editor) is practically impossible. As far as I know you have to select each object and add it to your route relation one by one.  
Have you tried using JOSM, a standalone desktop application? It is much easier to build and fix routes with it.
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-30 22:11:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150728692 where the changeset comment is: delete fake beaches
FraukeLeo (2025-06-21 07:46:50+00:00): Hallo heiglandreas, du hast https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1278587615 mit access=no und den angrenzenden Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32403239 mit access=yes. Stimmt das so?

access=yes heißt "offen für alle Verkehrsarten" - einschließlich Schwerlastfernverkehr; access=no heißt "gesperrt für alle Verkehrsarten" - auch für Fußgänger und Reiter.
heiglandreas (2025-06-21 14:48:58+00:00): Ja. Der Weg ist komplett gesperrt, da die Brücke darüber baufällig ist. Abgesperrt mit Bauzaun! Auch für Reiter und Fußgänger.
FraukeLeo (2025-06-21 15:36:27+00:00): alles klar, danke :) access=no wird so oft falsch gesetzt (wenn gemeint ist "für KFZ gesperrt"), dass ich lieber nachfrage. Wenn du das vermeiden willst, setz eine note=* dazu, etwa "note=Vollsperrung wegen baufälliger Brücke" oder so. Dann sieht man gleich, dass das kein Versehen bzw. Missverständnis ist.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-30 19:00:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11386353112

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kapazao (2024-05-03 10:43:34+00:00): Hi, could you explain why did you change the highway to secondary?
I had fixed it some time ago because we have some standards in this region about road classification.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas#Andaluc%C3%ADa
I will revert these changes and please avoid changing things you do not know or talk with community.
Regards
kiwi75 (2024-05-03 19:02:59+00:00): Hi, I just happened to be there and saw a busy dual carriageway that seemed to fit a 'secondary' class. I haven't really checked the regional standards, so I understand that this may have violated them. Thanks for reverting my erroneous edits.
SpinOff (2025-06-13 22:12:40+00:00): Czy "Obwodnica Bielska Podlaskiego" to oficjalna nazwa?
HurricaneGator (2024-05-02 14:15:11+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Mapillary.
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-12 05:14:24+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150723889
aTarom (2024-05-01 07:31:59+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, la etiqueta "name:ca" tiene consumidor de datos y no se debe eliminar en la mayoría de los casos, uno de los proyectos que la usa es
https://www.openstreetmap.cat/
Gracias y feliz mapeo, cualquier duda puedes comunicarla en el foro de la comunidad
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/name-ca-una-peca-mes-del-mosaic-cultural-i-tecnic/104631
Saludos
Monolo23 (2024-05-01 11:52:47+00:00): Sin problemas, lo tengo en cuenta para las proximas ediciones, gracias!
aTarom (2024-05-01 14:32:28+00:00): Genial! muchas gracias por la rápida respuesta y reparación, todo un placer colaborar así.
silversurfer83 (2024-05-02 13:19:23+00:00): Gude :)

zwei Hinweise:
Farben, wie viele andere Werte auch, bitte in English oder als Farbcode eintragen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:colour

Namen benötigen idR keine Anführungszeichen. Hängt naturlich von der Situation vor Ort ab, aber normalerweise nicht.

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150723987
Jonas Sch (2024-05-02 17:20:28+00:00): Das "rote" ist halt der Name...
Jonas Sch (2024-05-02 17:22:53+00:00): Oh, das meintest du.
silversurfer83 (2024-05-02 17:43:30+00:00): 😄
Genau
seewäldler (2024-04-30 20:06:02+00:00): Hallo ChrisFromRV

ist am way 118941407 das Zusatzzeichen 1000-31 wirklich abmontiert worden? Der Radweg ist doch in beide Richtungen benutzungspflchtig, da kann ich mir das nicht vorstellen.
ChrisFromRV (2024-04-30 21:29:57+00:00): Das Zusatzzeichen 1000-31 gibt es nicht.
seewäldler (2024-05-01 13:07:22+00:00): Was meinst du mit "gibt es nicht"? Ich wüsste nicht, dass das Zeichen "Beide Richtungen, zwei gegengerichtete senkrechte Pfeile" aus der StVO gestrichen wurde. 

Oder meinst du das Zusatzzeichen ist dort nicht aufgestellt? Auch das stimmt nicht, siehe z.B. auf dem mapillary-Foto hier:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=47.6584264&lng=9.4737311&z=17&pKey=173992201282770&focus=photo&x=0.49123070743129965&y=0.4564918703720883&zoom=0 Im Januar stand war das Schild noch angebracht.
ChrisFromRV (2024-05-01 13:24:53+00:00): Laut: "https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Verkehrszeichen_in_Deutschland" gibt es das Schild nicht.
seewäldler (2024-05-01 15:13:40+00:00): Nicht jedes Verkehrszeichen der StVO
muss zwangsweise im Wiki von OSM aufgelistet sein. Hier: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bildtafel_der_Verkehrszeichen_in_der_Bundesrepublik_Deutschland_seit_2017  findest du, wie in der von dir genannten Wiki-Seite gleich oben genannt, die vollständige Liste der Verkehrszeichen, und da taucht das Zusatzzeichen 1000-31 auf. 

Ausserdem ist das Zusatzzeichen ja wirklich da am Radweg ausgeschildert.
ChrisFromRV (2024-05-01 15:22:47+00:00): OK, du hast Recht. Werde versuchen ob ich das Schild in der OSM-Wiki irgendwie einfügen kann. Dankeschön...
mcliquid (2024-05-13 06:56:46+00:00): Ich habe die Verkehrszeichen wieder so angepasst, wie ich es am 30.03.2024 bereits eingetragen hatte: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151252352

Vergleich: https://trafficsigns.osm-verkehrswende.org/?signs=DE%3A1000-31%7CDE%3A241-30
seewäldler (2024-05-13 17:19:24+00:00): Danke!
MxxCon (2024-05-03 20:43:56+00:00): Hello.
These crosswalks look rather strange and do not appear on any satellite imagery. could you please elaborate what are you trying to map here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150724278
MxxCon (2024-05-03 20:47:38+00:00): I think you are going a bit overboard here with turn restrictions 😅. Who would ever decide to do a u-turn from a driveway onto a street back into the same driveway🤣. And I can't imagine any situation where a navigation router ever give such directions too.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150724726
Eino81 (2024-05-29 13:34:23+00:00): Hi Marek, I was there yesterday... Nope, that street was still closed, on both side... The houses are there, the surface of the road is also fine, but on both side there was a metal fence to block it, it is still impossible to go over on that street...
eggie (2024-04-30 20:00:35+00:00): Dag Marty

Iets is of een tunnel of een viaduct. Hier is het al een viaduct. Dus hoort er geen tunnel getagd te zijn. 
Haal je de tagging van de tunnel weer weg?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-04-30 20:05:28+00:00): Beste Marty Op dit soort valkken als een parking zetten we geen foot=yes
Vlakken routeren sowieso niet. 
Het gaat om de weg (lijn element) en daar is foot=yes default.
gr eggie
MxxCon (2024-05-03 20:49:14+00:00): Prefix for a cut tree would be...not a prefix but just natural=tree_stump? 😅
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150725080
MxxCon (2024-05-03 20:50:46+00:00): Also, italian restaurant named "C"?🤨
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150725080
paulbrunner (2024-05-07 05:13:54+00:00): Ah right, tree_stump it is, thanks!

"C" is indeed the restaurant's name. The logo outside of it looks more like a copyright sign, so I asked staff and they said it's "C" (pronounced "cee"), from the owner's first name, Charlie. I've a description tag and a little more info to the entry now to make it look less like a tagging mistake.
paulbrunner (2024-05-07 05:14:44+00:00): Restaurant node is here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11869866431
eggie (2024-04-30 20:02:58+00:00): Dag Marty  Het lijkt me niet correct. Alle begin is moeilijk. Is het wellicht een amenity=parking.
Bij plein denken we in OSM aan monumentale pleinen als de Dam en het Rode Plein.
foot=yes zal hier niets doen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-04-30 20:03:56+00:00): Op een footway hoort geen foot=yes Het is immers een voetpad en daar is foot=yes al default.
Haal je het weer weg. 
Groet
eggie
VictorIE (2024-07-27 07:20:38+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363523981

I don't think this can be called part of the Loop Line.
Darrman (2024-07-27 10:38:51+00:00): I set this section as part of the Loop Line as the bridges here are numbered as Loop Line bridges.
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48499944 for an example.
eggie (2024-04-30 20:08:22+00:00): Top !  foot=yes hoeft ook niet. Die accesstag is default.
gr eggie
eggie (2024-05-01 06:35:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Szymson (2024-04-30 20:34:25+00:00): https://drogi.gddkia.gov.pl/mapy/mapa-informacji-drogowej

Zobacz sobie słupki pikietażowe, to nadal jest S7
:-} (2024-04-30 21:02:30+00:00): Sęk w tym, że ta strona ma błędy w oznaczeniach drogowych (patrz S7 przy węźle Salomea, patrz A8 przy węźle Wrocław Południe, Wrocław Psie Pole. Drogi gddkia nie są takim dobrym źródłem potwierdzający taki stan
NeisBot (2024-04-30 20:34:04+00:00): Hello Альберт Балтачев, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
aTarom (2024-05-01 12:43:14+00:00): Hola bienvenido, puedes explicar la razón de cambiar a playa este elemento?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386821660/history
Saludos
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-12 05:13:25+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150726173
gogorm (2024-05-14 17:04:36+00:00): Thanks!
silversurfer83 (2024-05-02 16:46:53+00:00): Gude :)

zwei Dinge:

- in Hessen haben wir auch die top ausgerichteten Luftbilder des Landes zu Verfügung. Die sind zum Zeichnen meist wesentlich besser. Und auch die Liegenschaftskarte.

- bist du dir ganz sicher, dass das, was da vorher als Parkplatz gekennzeichnet war, der Werstoffhof ist und nicht die Stelle, die du gelöscht hast?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150726313
BCNorwich (2024-05-01 06:48:03+00:00): Hi, Please have a close look at your new buildings. There are many instances of very close nodes that should be joined, as indicated by the warnings above. Also, the buildings could do with squaring up.

I've made lot's of corrections to previous changesets but will leave this one so you can see the problems.

Regards Bernard.
aceman444 (2025-02-08 13:03:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2208370925 na webstranke uvadzaju, ze v sobotu je zatvorene. Takze odkial je Vas udaj? Okrem toho prosim zapisuje otvaracie hodiny v spravnom formate.
aceman444 (2025-02-08 14:05:05+00:00): To iste
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2208363406 .

A ked to nie je obchod vinom, tak to nie je nic? Co tak craft=winery? Potrebuje to nejaku hlavnu znacku co to je za objekt.
Константин Гам (2025-03-28 08:06:41+00:00): Не надо пожалуйста дублироовать в name содержимое тега ref
Frans S (2024-05-01 10:09:22+00:00): Hello . Thanks for your contribution to this project.
You retagged a number of paths into highway=unclassified. 
Why ? The tag path was correct. Less than 2 mtr wide !
Best regards
Frans S (2024-05-01 10:09:47+00:00): How to decide when a trace is a path or an unclassified highway (main choices in rural areas)
First, look what they connect.  Houses, settlements, villages. Then measure the width of that trace.

In iDeditor 

Shortcut : Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle  opens measurement panel
Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.
If a trace is max 2 meters wide, tag it as a path. Use footway only in urban (town) areas.
Wider and connect hamlets, houses and villages should be tagged as unclassified.
Tag residential in urban areas (villages, towns)

In JOSM, use the measure tab or, draw a circle (round building, shortcut Alt-Z when the building plugin is installed)) between the shoulders of a trace and read the distance on the lower toolbar. (don't map that bulding)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
This is mentioned about tracks on the
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routing#Routing_considerations

Quote: Tracks are roads of agricultural purpose. They usually connect fields to farms. The surface sometimes makes them inaccessible for regular cars, or at least limits the speeds to a very slow pace. Tagging a trace as 'track' should always be avoided for through-going traffic, access to houses/farms or within urban areas.

Important. Please connect highways to each other, where obvious,  to get a network which can be used by GPS NAV systems.

Best regards