piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
fortera_au (2024-10-16 03:49:51+00:00): It does seem preferred so you can still specify what type of rail it is.
csimeona22 (2024-10-16 17:11:00+00:00): Correction: Source used was Bing Streetside.
NeisBot (2024-10-16 01:53:54+00:00): Ooops, it seems that some of your names are a bit unusual ...

Amount>=1
#NeisLab #Minutely #Naming
Juanes0710 (2024-10-16 01:56:55+00:00): Yep, that´s normal, I´m from Colombia and there are more names more unusual .
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-16 03:44:13+00:00): Thanks for your reply, Juanes0710.

#HappyMapping
b-jazz (2025-04-07 05:33:33+00:00): https://osm.org/node/12090867003 seems slightly out of place, being in the middle of a golf green and all. I'm assuming it is supposed to be by the nearby water feature.
quincylvania (2025-04-07 22:06:23+00:00): Hi b-jazz, it looks like the gage is indeed on the golf course, but based on bing streetside it's about 370 feet to the east. These things are usually pretty small so can be hard to map from imagery, but if you know what you're looking for you can sometimes spot them. In any case, all these stream gages were imported from the highest quality USGS data I could find, and the location is often off by a bit. It seems that even USGS doesn't know exactly where the gages are. I figured it's still useful to have a general sense of the location and then they can be micro mapped later.
b-jazz (2025-04-09 20:51:51+00:00): OK, cool. Just wanted someone to be aware. Should I at least move it closer to the water and maybe at a fixme tag?
quincylvania (2025-04-09 21:05:48+00:00): Oh I guess I wasn't clear. I corrected the data in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164654386
mueschel (2024-10-17 12:09:42+00:00): Hi,
it seems very strange to have so many webcams on a single node. They all show different things. It would be very helpful to have these cams on individual nodes in their actual position, including a tag for the direction they point.
quincylvania (2024-10-17 15:24:10+00:00): Hi mueschel, I assume you're talking about https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12080242757 ?  I agree the webcams should be mapped separately when possible. I think also having the webcam links on the monitoring site is still useful. But in this case the stockade bridge webcam is somewhat upstream and should be mapped and then those tags removed. https://ny.water.usgs.gov/maps/mohawk-icejam/
quincylvania (2024-10-17 15:38:41+00:00): Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158014656
yurinchi (2024-10-16 02:30:21+00:00): 建物の追加と土地利用の追加
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-10-16 05:14:30+00:00): correct restriction.
felipeeugenio (2024-10-16 12:57:52+00:00): Hola. Otro tema, an addr:housenumber va el número de la calle.
Si además este número tiene letras o pisos, entonces agregarlos como addr:unit o addr:flats

yo ya he estado corrigiendo varios. Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157944591
ChromeLotus (2024-10-17 17:04:24+00:00): Hello Fuad alkaf, I wanted to reach out regarding the foot=no tag that was added back to a ferry route segment (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/966416674). Strava data seems to indicate that pedestrians can use this ferry, so I was hoping you could provide clarification on the cited survey data that informed your edit. Your input here would be much appreciated!

-ChromeLotus
felipeeugenio (2024-10-16 12:39:50+00:00): Hola. Muy buenas las ediciones.

Eso si por favor que el addr:street= sea igual que la calle que pasa por fuera.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157945525
Frans S (2024-10-18 13:21:59+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
You changed the tagging of an unclassified highway into path, despite it is a thoroughgoing road with a width of minimal 5 mtr and serves as access to a trunk in the west. I re-tag it into highway= tertiary.
Best regards
Alliegaytor (2024-10-16 04:47:04+00:00): Hi, do you have a source for this name change? The website listed states the station's name as "Victor Harbour" 

https://www.steamrangerheritagerailway.org/contact-us/
Supt_of_Printing (2024-10-16 06:04:42+00:00): Hi, my mistake. I knew the town didn't have the "u" so I assumed the railway station didn't as well. I will fix.
Necessarycoot72 (2024-10-16 04:37:08+00:00): source https://www2.census.gov/geo/tiger/GENZ2020/shp/cb_2020_50_place_500k.zip
karlmagos (2024-10-16 04:46:31+00:00): A lot of delivery riders get confused on this as they actually enters this street when going to our location, when in fact it's a dead end.
IreuN (2026-01-08 19:23:24+00:00): Hejka! Widzę że pododawałem tutaj give_way na drogach na których jest pas rozbiegowy. Sugeruję takich rzeczy nie dodawać - każdy taki tag dodaje 'karę' przy nawigacjach, która nie bardzo ma sens gdy istnieje pas rozbiegowy (i ustąp pierwszeństwa jest w zasadzie wirtualny). Pozdrawiam :)
Marek_P (2026-01-08 20:37:34+00:00): OK, dzięki za uwagę. Wezmę w przyszłości pod uwagę :)
Fizzie-DWG (2024-10-18 01:08:21+00:00): Hello, & welcome to OSM! Nice work in mapping houses, especially in an area where not many people map! A couple of things to point out though. When you've finished mapping a building (or anything else with a regular shape) please hit the "Q" button, which will make it's corners nicely squared. You've also listed quite tall heights for most of these buildings? Are the 1 & 2 level buildings really 10-15m tall?
Fizzie-DWG (2024-10-18 01:11:12+00:00): The other thing to mention is in regard to privacy. We ask that you please don't list people's names against their homes when you map them. Could you please go back & remove those family names that you've mapped? Any questions, please ask! Thanks
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-21 20:55:01+00:00): Reviewed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157947156
NeisBot (2024-10-16 05:14:38+00:00): Hi lasthenia, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 90% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=157947203
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-16 08:00:28+00:00): Thanks for your private message and your clean-up here, lasthenia!

#HappyMapping
keithonearth (2024-10-30 05:15:00+00:00): I'd also be interested in why [this way](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1314750813/history) was deleted. I was the one who mapped that beach, and do not understand why it was deleted.
lasthenia (2024-10-30 18:51:35+00:00): I was trying to make the shape of Rose Point match the way it appeared on Bing Satellite Imagery. The way it was mapped seemed, to me, like it was following older satellite imagery. And the landform being a spit would mean it's liable to shift.
keithonearth (2024-10-31 00:01:33+00:00): That does not explain why you deleted the way that mapped what was beach. Did you follow the link to the way I linked to in my comment?
Euskirchener (2024-10-16 05:20:30+00:00): Mist, zu schnell auf Enter gedrückt. Es sollte heißen "Teilrevert CS 157938457 von UKausch in meinem Gebiet Euskirchen: Mapper reagiert nicht auf CS-Kommentare eines anderen Mappers, führt fragwürdige und große/ggf. manuelle Änderungen durch. AUßerdem hier speziell in Euskirchen Schwachsinn. Bereits "geschlossene" Brauereien mit Lifecycle prefixes werden so umgebaut, dass einige Tags gelöscht bzw. andere wieder neu ergänzt werden - Unsinn! Dafür hab ich doch die Lifecycle Tags benutzt, um die Historie zu bewahren und alles auf inaktiv zu setzen. Da muss nix dran gemacht werden!!! Ich vermute auch, dass die Edits dieses Mappers in Gefahr eines kompletten Reverts stehen, wenn er sich nicht auf die CS-Kommentare äußert oder weitermacht"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:10:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Frans S (2024-10-17 13:18:01+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, No buildings squared !

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157948064
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 01:19:56+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164657232
cowboyxup (2024-10-16 09:14:31+00:00): Hallo fs_LT,
Hat sich das geändert, denn vor 2 Wochen konnte ich noch über eine extra Fahrrad Ampelschaltung über die Kreuzung fahren: Siehe: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=436509312681451
fs_LT (2024-10-16 09:55:23+00:00): Hallo cowboyxup,
du hast recht, habe ich mich vertan. Habe ich wieder geändert. Danke für den Hinweis.
fortera_au (2024-10-16 06:47:44+00:00): Hi, paved is a generic catch-all option for roads that have been properly surfaced, these roads do look like they are asphalt and should be tagged as they were before.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157948805
Abisdad (2024-10-16 07:33:58+00:00): Ah - OK, new to this. Started to edit as I'm using RideWithGPS, which uses this dataset, but it was coming up as umpaved. Played about with it a couple of weeks ago, but the RideWithGPS hasn't updated. So just tried this. Also changed to "secondary", so matches similar roads in the area.
So I should charge it back to asphalt? 🤔
fortera_au (2024-10-16 07:40:26+00:00): RideWithGPS may only update very so often.
I also wouldn't change roads like this one to secondary, it's not a major road of any kind, it's a shortcut as most from what can be seen. I think this and the other highway class changes should be reverted, unless there's reasons for any specific one to be higher than unclassified/residential.
fortera_au (2024-10-16 07:46:09+00:00): I've reverted these en-masse back to how they were before.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157951753
fortera_au (2024-10-16 07:48:07+00:00): I've done a revert of these changes in one go to make it easier, I'd recommend reading some of the pages about highway classifications and surface tagging on the OSM Wiki, and there's plenty of places to discuss with the community if you're not sure about things.
Abisdad (2024-10-16 07:51:24+00:00): Hey - thanks for supporting me like this...
Did you see my reply above?
I've gone and changed all the surface types to Asphalt, as that is what they are, now that you've educated me about Paved.
I'm confused as to the road types - is fete a document that specifies what makes these types? As similar roads are Secondary.
Thanks, ☺️
Abisdad (2024-10-16 07:53:28+00:00): Can you send me a link to these documents you mention, as I'm unable to find it. 🤔
Thanks. 🙏🏼
fortera_au (2024-10-16 07:57:06+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways is a good starting place, but I'd make sure you're understanding the differences before changing highway classifications, a jump from unclassified to secondary is a pretty significant jump. Highway classification should take into consideration several factors including traffic/usage, place in the greater road network, routes travelling along a road, etc.
Abisdad (2024-10-16 07:59:38+00:00): I see that you've undone all the road surface edits too, which is pretty demoralising for me.
I thought I was helping out a bit, but you've just come along and destroyed all my edits, before I had a chance to read your feedback & work it out.
Am I just wasting my time learning your platform & interface & trying to contribute?
fortera_au (2024-10-16 08:03:48+00:00): I reverted them en-masse to save time, immediately after responding to you. Please don't see it as as a negative sign, it was just the easiest way to correct those changes. I'm happy to go through and redo any of the surface changes you've made, but I'd also recommend making sure you're understanding what the changes you make mean, as changes are live and made immediately. Please do learn and contribute, this was all intended to be constructive and help make sure changes are correct.

Text isn't always the best way to get across things, so I apologise if my comments do seem harsh!
Abisdad (2024-10-16 08:17:13+00:00): OK - no problem - I've had a quick read to that doc, and I think the reason for the misunderstanding is that the other roads in the area - such as Beaumont Rd are classified as Secondary, but are probably not. So not an exact science.
My motivation - as you might have guessed - is that I organize cycling rides with two groups in the area using RideWithGPS, and find it frustrating when the map data is incorrect.  One group loves dirt & gravel, the other can only use asphalt! 
Also there is a new cycling track that is being constructed from Mt Torrens to Birdwood along a disused  rail track, which is extending the Amy Gillett bike path.  how will this be added?
Thanks for your help with a newbie, but you understand that I was a mite upset to see all the surface changes, which initially took a bit of time to work out how to achieve, just wiped! :-)
I'm getting the hang of it now and will lay off the re-classification s#it... :-D
fortera_au (2024-10-16 08:28:08+00:00): Yeah there's definitely plenty of roads around that could have classifications improved. It's probably best if you think two roads are classed differently but seem similar, to evaluate both of them.

Definitely add surface tags to help with that, paved/unpaved are generic tags for a start, and then you can check out the Wiki page [1] for the more specific ones.

For adding the new path, the best way to do it ASAP is to ride it! See if you can get a GPS that can record tracks, or see if you can do it with your phone or a smartwatch, that'll give you a GPS trace that can be used as a starting point, and then over time if you do that a few times you can get a more accurate trace of the path and improve it further. Once it's on aerial imagery then it can be traced from there, but GPS recordings are going to be much quicker than waiting for imagery.

If you've ever got questions or want someone to double check your thinking, feel free to flick me a message on here, or jump over to the forums [2] or Discord [3], there's always plenty of people who are happy to help!

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface
[2] https://community.openstreetmap.org
[3] https://discord.gg/openstreetmap
Abisdad (2024-10-16 08:42:56+00:00): Awesome! 🙏🏼
Happier now. 👍🏼
The ADHD & spectrum part in me sometimes gets out! ☺️🤯
trial (2026-02-06 16:41:10+00:00): La rue prend une majuscule et Liberté un accent : Rue de Port Liberté.
highway 	pedestrian
motor_vehicle 	yes
Voie pétionne ou pas ? Il faudrait savoir.
Etant donné qu'il y a des places de parking....
oneway 	no
inutile, c'est par défaut
eggie (2024-10-16 15:09:03+00:00): Dag jkorrf    Ik heb het zo aangepast dat je het gemaal ook ziet op de kaart en het water gesplitst.
Even kijken wat de rendering doet.
CTRL-F5
'k Namelijk niet de naam op de kaart.
Het kan ook als vlak worden ingetekend. 
MVG
eggie
fortera_au (2024-10-16 06:48:38+00:00): Hi, what's the justification for changing this quiet road from unclassified all the way up to secondary?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157949011
fortera_au (2024-10-16 07:46:10+00:00): I've reverted these en-masse back to how they were before.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157951753
eggie (2024-10-16 14:49:55+00:00): Top!
Gr eggie
jkorf (2024-10-17 13:05:29+00:00): Hoi eggie,

Is dat koppelen aan een BAG node een standaard? Ik zie dat eigenlijk op heel veel plekken juist niet gebeuren.

Groeten
eggie (2024-10-17 13:19:09+00:00): Hoi..
Nou.. er is in het verleden wel over gesteggeld. We zijn pas later begonnen met importeren vanuit de BAG.

Er waren dus geen adresnodes en ook geen gebouwen.
De standaard kaart laat toevallig de huisnummers zien. Andere kaarten niet.

Nu is de consensus om op de BAG adresnode bij te taggen.
Wanneer ik twee adressen zie of een bedrijf zonder adres voeg ik samen.

Uitzonderingen om soms het gebouw of vlak  van instellingsinfo te voorzien zijn kerken.. campings.. soms scholen.

Mapse..
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-16 06:30:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawną składnię. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres strony internetowej został skrócony przez serwis typu URL shortener.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398723300
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/906274165
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/906274528

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
fortera_au (2024-10-16 06:50:22+00:00): Hi, what's your justifications for changing these sections from unclassified up to secondary, a significant jump?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157949137
fortera_au (2024-10-16 07:46:11+00:00): I've reverted these en-masse back to how they were before.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157951753
trial (2026-02-06 15:43:43+00:00): terraced signifie une maisonnette en alignement avec d'autres maisons identiques. Rein à voir ici.
trial (2026-02-06 15:54:06+00:00): De plus vous avez doublonné le 6. L'autre point d'adresse est le bon.
trial (2026-02-06 15:44:47+00:00): voir mon autre commentaire, de plus Q permet de faire une forme rectangulaire
dpolovinkin (2024-10-16 07:02:10+00:00): hola again amigo!
just noticed - you know it's not correct to make all changeset comments "adittions, clarifications" in OSM mapping,  its kinda obvious already and gives 0 info. So can you pls write what exactly did you change or add

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

thanks!
DaanLT (2024-10-16 11:07:58+00:00): yes i know, mostly i map many things at once, so i cant describe everything, but i do proper comments when i map specific things.
SomeoneElse (2024-12-31 13:31:06+00:00): Hello DaanLT,
I'm sure you could do a _bit_ better than "additions, corrections" every single time :)
Best Regards,
Andy (from OSM's Data Working Group)
canfe (2024-10-16 09:00:30+00:00): crossing:markings=yes su attraversamenti pedonali non credo sia da mettere
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157949383
ivanbranco (2024-10-16 09:08:57+00:00): Anche secondo me è superfluo, esiste una issue aperta qua: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/10474
marc__marc (2026-01-22 18:19:47+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/953761539
Is the electric heating a radiator?
Is the stove wood-burning?
I am trying to improve the description of the heating by separating the heat emitters from the energy entering the building.
Is this correct for this one ?
heating=radiator;stove
heating:input=electricity;wood 
Regards,
Marc
sbre (2026-01-23 09:12:23+00:00): That seems essentially correct, yes. Two heat emitters with separate inputs.
marc__marc (2026-01-24 23:29:42+00:00): thanks for your feedback, update done.
trial (2026-02-06 15:50:20+00:00): Bonjour, la couche PCRS raster permet de mieux le dessiner.
trial (2026-02-06 15:52:32+00:00): Bonjour, la règle ne France est de mettre le numéro de rue au droit de la limite voie publique/terrain privé, mais sur la maison (voir les environs et la couche Cadastre)
j0hn33y (2024-10-16 13:53:41+00:00): Thank you, how did you find the bad node?
Aleksandar1994 (2024-10-17 06:55:46+00:00): You're welcome! 
When you select the relation, just click on "Validation." In this case, it showed me that the relation is intersecting itself at this point (38.9683685, -84.2747564).
fortera_au (2024-10-16 07:28:38+00:00): Hi, why have you changed this small section to secondary?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157949829
trial (2026-02-06 16:42:02+00:00): Taper 0 pour faire une forme ronde.
trial (2026-02-06 16:43:39+00:00): Merci de ne pas entrer de fausses information dans OpenStreetMap.
trial (2026-02-06 15:57:01+00:00): Bonjour, il faut garder la connexion avec les voiries existantes (ici le chemin débouche sur la rue du Petit Phare).
C'est d'ailleurs une alerte que vous a faite l'éditeur.
trial (2026-02-06 15:59:25+00:00): Là vous avez 3 adresses identiques, deux maisons superposées...
dval (2024-11-18 12:24:01+00:00): Hi, Mir76! На границах парка нет barrier=fence, хотя есть barrier_type. Всё бы ничего, но еще один до вас провел частично по той же линии barrier=wall. Что в реальности?
Mir76 (2024-11-19 11:31:21+00:00): Местами бетонная стена, местами забор-решетка, местами вообще ничего. Примерно 20%, 40% и 40% соответственно.
amicklew (2024-10-17 10:06:55+00:00): Thanks for the fix !