piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jenessian (2026-07-17 12:36:46+00:00): Noted with thanks. I’ll never use the outdated Bing Imagery again. Now I rely on the Esri imagery (not Clarity Beta) for mappingthe Gaza Strip. Thank you. But also if a building is demolished is there a way to mark it instead of deleting it? Because I also heard that “building ruins” applies only to deliberate sham ruins
zstadler (2026-07-17 12:58:21+00:00): I doubt that sat imagery can tell you if any remaining of the building exist on the ground to a level that justifies any of the OSM Stages of decay prefixes https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_decay.

May I suggest you get in touch with @xx%20yyy19 and check which imagery is up-to-date. I have no knowledge on this subject. I've only noticed two overlapping mapping efforts by the two of you.
xx yyy19 (2026-07-17 16:42:29+00:00): Hello @Jenessian,
Esri Imagery is also not current for the Gaza strip! Generally, creating new objects in a war zone (like the Gaza strip) is problematic since it is too much dynamic. Latest Planet Labs PBC Imagery or Vantor Imagery will give you accurate information, but they are very expensive at a resolution needed for mappers like us. What you can do, in some cases, is identify objects and nodes that were present (in the past) but due to war related activities have been modified or removed (such as builds leveled to the ground or road that no longer exist).
Jenessian (2026-07-17 22:40:09+00:00): Oh
How about editing Afghanistan?
Wildsharky (2026-07-17 06:06:38+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185831874
Marcos Dione (2026-07-14 12:09:04+00:00): Hola. LAs veredas no se mapean así. O las declarás en la línea de la calle que ya existe de forma similar a lo que hiciste en esa vía paralela que pusiste, o ponés una línea paralela como ésa, pero con tag highway=footway + footway=sidewalk .

Ahí lo arreglo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185701965
Marcos Dione (2026-07-14 12:11:41+00:00): Ah, no, perdón, está bien, hay una calle paralela, ahora veo.

Aún así la voy a partir en dos, una vereda y un camino peatonal (no calle peatonal). La diferencia es sutil: le vereda es paralela a la calle y los caminos tienen más libertad, como el que va a l cruce de las vías.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185701965
TallebudgeraValley (2026-07-20 15:22:56+00:00): Sounds good, thank you for your help! Let me know if there is anything more I need to do here. Hope you have a nice day!
rempshaener (2026-07-17 19:35:29+00:00): Hallo,
eine Anmerkung zu deinen Ergänzungen:
Das Feld "couplings" bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten normalerweise leer, da es sich um die „Angabe der vorhandenen Anzahl an Schlauchanschlüssen“ handelt, siehe osm.wiki/DE:Key:couplings?uselang=de. Unterflurhydranten haben in der Regel nur mit Standrohr eine Schlauchkupplung. 
Viele Grüße
eggie (2026-07-14 08:50:03+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Het incomplete adres heb ik weer verwijderd. Er is al een adresnode.

MVG
eggie
Kovoschiz (2026-07-14 19:32:56+00:00): `name=` is for proper nouns only. This should be `description:en=`
Winfred Wan (2026-07-22 15:37:57+00:00): Thanks.
kubahahaha (2026-07-14 10:30:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919828759

Jaki tu jest znak? C-13? Z jakąś tabliczką?
Yog Sot (2026-07-14 20:29:06+00:00): bez tabliczki, jakie to niby ma znaczenie? czy znów potrzebujesz link do googla bo nie wierzysz mi na słowo?
dknelson9876 (2026-07-15 01:46:39+00:00): Hi sbedwal_Lyft, please note that because of the unusual way we name streets here in Utah, we have specific guidelines on a dedicated wiki page: osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions. In this case, this street already had correct name tags, representing the "North" prefix in the name:prefix=* and name:full=* tags, making it incorrect to include it in the regular name=* tag.
sbedwal_Lyft (2026-07-15 09:14:25+00:00): Hi dknelson9876,
My name is Santosh, and I'm a mapper on the OpenStreetMap team at Lyft.Thank you for bringing this to our attention, and we apologize for the oversight.
We appreciate the clarification and for pointing us to the Utah naming conventions. I wasn't aware of the local tagging guideline, and your explanation was very helpful. I'll review the wiki and make sure to follow the established Utah tagging practices in future edits. We value the knowledge of local mappers and are always happy to collaborate to keep OpenStreetMap data accurate and consistent.
Thanks again for taking the time to explain this.

Happy Mapping!
Regards,
Santosh
9bc638d (2026-07-15 09:55:07+00:00): 您导入的不少村庄与osm原有的重复了，还请注意。
9bc638d (2026-07-15 11:07:36+00:00): 而且数据质量也不是很好。请逐个确认再上传。
ffmp (2026-07-24 08:03:47+00:00): Thanks, don't know, how can I miss this. Possibly because .tm is top-level-domain for Turkmenistan.
aq123 (2026-07-16 07:25:54+00:00): Пожалуйста, не объединяйте в один changeset правки в разных странах:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185704760
Udarian (2026-07-14 18:46:11+00:00): ok, I fixed this roundabout once already, see the conversation at https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C029HV951/p1781704568456079 . Due to the slip lane from Sylvania Boulevard to Southwest 12th Street (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/703986728) traffic will not be going from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/703986713 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1524885406 so it is ok that they share a vertex. There is also a no right turn restriction relation disallowing that movement https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20995910. See the above attached OSMUS Slack link for the conversation about this exact roundabout.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
Siarhei Salauyou (2026-07-15 08:26:15+00:00): Hello, Udar! Thanks for the clarification. I understand the reasoning and won't make further changes here. Best regards, Siarhei
Fraxi (2026-07-14 10:31:28+00:00): Значи, извинявай, но ако работното време на https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4998631161 си го видял на витрината, opening_hours:signed=no е излишен. А ако това РВ си го видял от друго място, можеш да го добавиш като стойност за opening_hours:source=
Lirum Larum (2026-07-14 17:32:33+00:00): Hi Optiml,
Ich kann bestätigen, dass das Gebäude vor 3 Monaten abgerissen wurde. Was auch immer du für Bilder benutzt, sie sind älter. Wenn jemand mit Quelle "survey" ein Gebäude als demolished kennzeichnet, darfst du grundsätzlich schon annehmen, dass das zutrifft. 
Beste Grüße
Jean-Marc Liotier (2026-07-15 22:27:19+00:00): Hello, thank you for adding points of interest - "Go Map!! 5.4.6" is a great application for that. But please refrain from drawing buildings with it: the geometries you produce are wrong because your application does not use the good imagery. Does it have an "orthogonalize" tool (like 'Q' in JOSM) ?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-14 19:18:06+00:00): Reverted adding a SEO POI with a blatant advertising changeset comment, mistaken/malformed tags and possible source of Google Maps, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185737513
Jean-Marc Liotier (2026-07-14 21:00:43+00:00): Please do not use Bing imagery here: we have 2025 drone imagery - incomparably better: https://map.openaerialmap.org/#/-3.1163460016250606,6.6690459061353415,17/square/0333312311223222103/6868d0c9042b629ed848f09f?_k=48a994
jcarlson (2026-07-16 20:13:57+00:00): Thanks for catching all of these. I've followed up with the intern doing this work to use the proper tag moving forward.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185705733
ChrissW-R1 (2026-07-17 03:54:47+00:00): I was happy to do that. Mistakes happen, especially on such large projects involving many people and a lot of data. That's why I regularly perform QA tasks.
Tom van Dijk (2026-07-14 09:47:47+00:00): Het was op dit stuk zó hobbelig. Vooral waar ik smoothness=bad neer heb gezet: zaten allemaal heuvels door boomwortels onder de grond, gaten, etc. Hier zou ik niet met de racefiets overheen gaan, en je moet heel voorzichtig fietsen met de stadsfiets (wat ik heb gedaan)
rskedgell (2026-07-14 10:35:49+00:00): Thanks!
eggie (2026-07-14 10:31:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Heten de gebouwen los van elkaar werkelijk Galgenveld?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Jack Ballarin (2026-07-14 11:44:10+00:00): Hi, the buildings are called by their number or postal code, but the complex is called galgenveld by the company that rents in that place, and includes 6 or 7 buildings in that area, but as i said there are no official names of the buildings other than house number and postal code
eggie (2026-07-14 13:22:36+00:00): Hi.. okay.. clear.
Greetz,
eggie
jaap de vries (2026-07-17 13:20:56+00:00): Dit zijn gebouwen van de SSHN (studentenhuisvesting) die hun pand toevallig ook naar het stadsdeel hebben vernoemd.
Frans S (2026-07-14 12:51:49+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Many buildings show a sidewall.
Please do not include these in your mapped building. Just draw the rooflines and move the whole to its footprint.
Best regards
donux-nl (2026-07-30 08:55:35+00:00): Bedankt voor het opschonen van de openingstijden van de Medi-market. Door knippen en plakken van de website had ik er wat fouten in zitten.
Wildsharky (2026-07-17 06:07:20+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185881855
VagueCarnage (2026-07-14 10:16:01+00:00): oops i couldnt add metadata for the buildings
Marvk (2026-07-14 12:11:03+00:00): Hallo CyrilleMdc,

wenn ich diesen Artikel richtig interpretiere, dann handelt es sich hier lediglich um Piktogramme auf der Straße.

https://www.trier.de/leben-in-trier/verkehr-mobilitaet/radverkehr/radverkehr-aktuell/17239.Radverkehr-Neue-Direktverbindung-in-die-City.html

Nach Wiki würde ich dies also nicht als separaten way kartieren, sondern als tags auf dem Haupt-Weg.

> Wenn Radwege als einzelne Nebenlinie (Way B) gemappt werden, sollte an allen Stellen, an denen auf die Fahrbahn gewechselt oder diese gequert werden kann, eine Verbindung zur Hauptlinie (Way A) hergestellt werden. Damit wird es Routern ermöglicht, umwegfreie Routen zu ermitteln. Ist diese Möglichkeit durchgehend gegeben, spricht das dafür, den Radweg mittels cycleway=* an die Hauptlinie zu taggen. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren

Hier wäre am Hauptweg also cycleway:left=shared_lane und cycleway:left:lane=pictogram sowie cycleway:right=no zu kartieren.

Entspricht das der Situation vor Ort? Für mich sieht es auf Mapillary so aus: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2349401302193348

Grüße
Marv
CyrilleMdC (2026-07-14 12:25:49+00:00): Dear Marv,

You're correct, I've done this incorrectly.
We should delete or reject the changes for now.

Thanks for your help!
Cyrille
Marvk (2026-07-14 12:28:05+00:00): I'll go ahead and fix it real quick :-)
Marvk (2026-07-14 12:35:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185714802

At least the main road should be roughly correct now, not sure about the connection to the sidewalk in the north. Needs some eyes on the ground I think.

Best Regards
Marv
CyrilleMdC (2026-07-14 14:10:08+00:00): Perfect, thanks.
I live next to the intersection.
There's a "two bike lane" *just* crossing Franz-Ludwig-Straße, it starts on the from the side walk and ends on the road, then becomes pictograms on Bruchausenstraße for the contraflow bikelane.

What you've done looks as good as it'll get.
Cheers,
Cyrille
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-14 19:20:40+00:00): Cleaned up SEO mistagging for POI in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185737653
user_5359 (2026-07-24 13:11:02+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1539016856. What is the mean of the tag idTarea = 164? Is this a local reference?
LordGarySugar (2026-07-19 00:47:57+00:00): Thanks for updating, bus relations look OK but as they're all ptv1 it doesn't really matter
eggie (2026-07-14 14:33:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-14 11:09:04+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Je vraagt feedback .. Lijkt me oke.
Alleen de format van de openingstijden klopt niet.
Weekdagen afkorten met twee letters. 
Je kunt evt deze tool gebruiken.. 
openingsuren-tool

http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

MVG
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:41:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321489 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Kyrgyzstan
pnorman (2026-07-14 20:55:32+00:00): Hello,

I was looking at the ESRI imagery and the top of the U-shaped road doesn't seem to exist on it. It looks like the roads go in to a parking area under the building.

Were you perhaps using a data source other than ESRI imagery?
Nirmala03 (2026-07-16 14:33:23+00:00): Hi pnorman, 
As per feedback and OSM guidelines reverting the edits. Please note we have paused the edits and will resume once community consultation is completed
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-14 12:13:47+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM! 
Danke für den ersten Beitrag.

Bei dieser Änderung sind mir einige Punkte aufgefallen:
- Im name=* Tag steht "Selbsterteidigung" vermutlich ist "Selbstverteidigung" gemeint. Bitte beschränke den Namen außerdem auf den tatsächlich vor Ort verwendeten Namen. Zusätzliche Suchbegriffe oder Beschreibungen sollten nicht in name=* aufgenommen werden, sofern sie nicht wirklich Bestandteil des ausgeschilderten Namens sind.
- Das description=* Tag enthält überwiegend werbliche beziehungsweise SEO-artige Formulierungen und zusätzlich den Tippfehler „WIr“. OSM ist keine Werbeplattform. Bitte entferne die Beschreibung oder reduziere sie auf eine kurze, sachliche Information. Die Art der Einrichtung sollte stattdessen mit passenden Tags erfasst werden, beispielsweise mit leisure=sports_centre und sport=martial_arts, sofern dies vor Ort zutrifft.
- Für den Firmeneintrag wurde ein vorhandener Geometrieknoten einer mit highway=service erfassten Zufahrt verwendet. Dadurch stellt derselbe Knoten gleichzeitig einen Teil der Straße und den Firmen-POI dar. Bitte lege für die Einrichtung einen eigenen POI-Punkt an der tatsächlichen Position an oder erfasse sie am passenden Gebäude beziehungsweise an der entsprechenden Gebäudeeinheit.

Auch addr:street=Ballygebiet 5605 Dottikon ist nicht korrekt strukturiert. Postleitzahl und Ort gehören nicht in addr:street=*, sondern gegebenenfalls in separate addr:*-Tags.

Kannst du die Eintragung bitte noch einmal entsprechend überarbeiten?

Danke und viele Grüße, Pascal
Martin Jepsen (2026-07-14 11:33:20+00:00): Oops, source should have been https://dma.mst.dk/vis-sag/download/62ee42ca-c091-4558-bfeb-c42a92d5c12b
eggie (2026-07-14 14:34:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Toine Hartman (2026-07-14 14:42:20+00:00): Dankjewel!
DressyPear4 (2026-07-14 12:25:21+00:00): Olá, 
Descrições não devem ser adicionadas em name;
Se a casa não tiver número, deixe em branco ou use nohousenumber=yes;
Nomes devem seguir o padrão em formato de título, apenas a primeira letra em maiúsculo;
E por fim a edificação deve seguir o contorno do telhado e não o lote todo.
Flávia Araújo (2026-07-14 12:31:23+00:00): Ola...tudo bem? Farei as correções o quanto antes, obrigada por avisar.
DressyPear4 (2026-07-14 15:49:28+00:00): Fiz ajustes na maioria de tags genéricas, para endereço veja
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:addr:*

já para pontos de interesse adicione apenas se tiver informações e não apenas um ponto genérico com "Comércio" no nome.
Você pode usar dados cadastrados do CNEFE 2022

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Importa%C3%A7%C3%A3o_dos_Dados_do_Censo_2022_-_IBGE

Discuta com comunidade local antes de qualquer importação.
GinaroZ (2026-07-16 14:19:23+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits.
Just a tip when adding buildings, if you press Q it will "square" the area as some of the ones you added were slightly wonky! :) Also many of these buildings can be tagged with a more specific value such as building=garage (I've fixed most of them)
aixbrick (2026-07-14 12:36:43+00:00): Hallo,
dass die Baustelle auf Ende August verschoben wurde ist, hoffe ich, bekannt?
Gruß
stadt-ac-vd (2026-07-14 13:20:27+00:00): Hallo aixbrick,
danke für den Hinweis, jetzt schon! :) Aber keine Sorge, die für die Umsetzung zuständigen Kollegen sind im Gegensatz zu mir natürlich bestens informiert und werden am 20.07. noch nichts veranlassen.
Viele Grüße
aixbrick (2026-07-14 13:47:54+00:00): alles klar :-)
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-17 12:53:39+00:00): operator and name should be separate values, there's no value in duplicating the operator in the name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185712359
Marek-M (2026-07-14 13:26:11+00:00): * Parking zwykle nie posiada adresu, więc dodawanie niepełnego adresu jest niepoprawne.
* Droga wewnątrz parkingu była poprawna.
* Nie łącz obszarów z drogami (tutaj połączyłeś parking z jezdnią).

Poprawiłem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185717471
pnorman (2026-07-14 19:44:28+00:00): The lot you've added the new roads to shows a connection to Obafemi Awolowo Way which looks suspect. Is this lot connected on both sides?
Vandana@28 (2026-07-16 15:04:44+00:00): Hi pnorman, 
The missing segments have been added based on available evidence. The existing one was not verified, as the primary intention was to add the missing segments rather than to review what was already in place. Please note we have paused the edits and will resume once community consultation is completed
Marek-M (2026-07-14 13:09:09+00:00): Cześć, wie wydaje mi się, żeby ta droga była wybudowana na nasypie. Czy na pewno jest to poprawna edycja?
Marek-M (2026-07-14 13:13:33+00:00): *wie = nie :)
Marek-M (2026-07-14 13:19:49+00:00): Jeżeli budynek nie ma adresu, to nie dodawaj do niego niepełnego tagowania addr:*, który jest zbędny.

Poprawiłem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185717142
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-15 07:34:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514959800

jest tu znak zakazu jazdy rowerem?
Marek-M (2026-07-14 13:16:52+00:00): Czy 'Pływalnia kryta Akademii Policji' jest nazwą tego obiektu, którą można zobaczyć np. na budynku? Jeżeli jest to tylko opis, to do tego służy inny tag: description
pesec (2026-07-15 05:02:35+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Данный пакет правок во многом нарушает геометрию объектов. Перед правкой выравнивайте спутниковую подложку. Используйте несколько источников.
yayaxxy (2026-07-15 06:41:17+00:00): Добрый день, а есть ли возможность показать какой-нибудь пример чтобы я лучше понимал о чем речь и как лучше не делать?
pesec (2026-07-15 10:38:54+00:00): Поищите видеоуроки на ютуб
yayaxxy (2026-07-15 10:49:03+00:00): Вопрос о том чтобы указать на конкретные ошибки которые я совершил здесь а не о том где искать информацию
pesec (2026-07-15 11:09:56+00:00): https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=185713475
Marek-M (2026-07-14 13:14:57+00:00): Taka długa brama? Może zamiast `barrier=gate` powinno być użyte `barrier=fence` (ogrodzenie)?
Marek-M (2026-07-14 13:13:05+00:00): Cześć, czy jest tu zakaz wchodzenia/wjazdu ograniczony znakiem? Droga zwykle nie jest brodem - bród powinien być węzłem na drodze, gdzie strumyk ją przecina.
pnorman (2026-07-14 19:41:58+00:00): The way added doesn't have any turn restrictions which means it's possible to do a u-turn here. Is that allowed?
Vandana@28 (2026-07-16 15:03:33+00:00): Hi pnorman,
The new road segment was added based on clear alignment between GPS traces and aerial imagery. To maintain map accuracy, features are only added when they can be fully verified. Since the available data does not provide clear evidence of a U-turn restriction, it was left out of this edit.
9_tab (2026-07-25 10:01:51+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164113191
chnuessli (2026-07-27 05:20:21+00:00): i changed the opening_hours to Mo-Fr. But just the times is a correct format, it means everyday from 0:00-17:00.
9_tab (2026-07-27 14:03:38+00:00): Thanks. I meant "Mo-Fr 08:00-17:00", it's just unlikely that this type of office is open on weekends.
pnorman (2026-07-14 19:40:25+00:00): I was looking at the area you edited and is it still under construction? The entire area is tagged as being a construction zone.

Also, it looks like the south road no longer extends all the way to and over the bridge.
Vandana@28 (2026-07-16 15:02:49+00:00): Hi pnorman, 
Thank you for looking into this area. The new road segment was added based on clear alignment between GPS traces and aerial imagery. Regarding your observations about the construction zone status, the alternate entrance, and the bridge connectivity, these features fall outside the immediate scope of this specific edit. The focus of this changeset was solely on adding the missing road segment verified by our data sources, rather than updating the surrounding basemap connectivity or construction tags.
MarcoR (2026-07-14 14:06:53+00:00): It seems the parking area you added was already mapped as private (way/162775940); is this parking area private or public?
Do you have to pay to park here?

Happy mapping,
Marco
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-14 19:26:54+00:00): Hi Serhii,

I cleaned up several tags here; besides fixing the invalid syntax in opening_hours=* (Sa, not Sat) and the format of phone=* (adding spaces), it seems that a name=* of "Plumber" should presumably imply craft=plumber rather than shop=bathroom_furnishing and doesn't belong in the name -- see https://osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only 

https://osm.org/changeset/185737853

However, in case this really is a store to purchase bathroom furnishings, that for whatever reason has the name of just "Plumber" as prominently displayed on signage, then feel free to revise accordingly.

 Happy mapping!
SerhiiM12345 (2026-07-15 08:41:09+00:00): Hey. 

Thank you!

"Plumber" is the name on the signage
CAM-Gerlach (2026-07-15 14:22:04+00:00): Gotcha, thanks for updating it further!

BTW, I meant to mention it before, but I noticed you linking Google Maps in the changeset comment--just a reminder that both Google and OSM policy prohibit using Google Maps as a source to contribute to OpenStreetMap, see  https://osm.wiki/Google , and would normally require complete removal of any affected changeset. As the changeset source=* is listed as survey and local knowledge without any mention of Google, I didn't take any action on that but just wanted to make sure you were aware.

Thanks, and happy mapping!
Wildsharky (2026-07-17 06:05:58+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185828425
eggie (2026-07-14 14:41:23+00:00): 
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Je hebt geen poi toegevoegd, maar het bedrijf toegevoegd aan de gebouwomtrek. Probeer als het kan bij te taggen op de adresnode. Het adres is niet compleet. Welk nummer zit de P fabriek? 

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
De Pannenfabriek Echt (2026-07-17 06:29:54+00:00): Hallo Eggie, Ik wil de Pannenfabriek graag toevoegen als POI, het is een verzamelgebouw met meerdere horeca zaken en heeft daarom ook meerdere huisnummers. Vandaar dat ik alle gebouwen die er bij horen heb aangeklikt. Kan je me helpen hoe ik het een POI maak? Ons doel is vindbaar zijn voor fietsers en wandelaars als horeca zaak, deze POI zit als het goed is dan ook gekoppeld aan Komoot. Bedankt. Groet Maud
De Pannenfabriek Echt (2026-07-17 06:40:41+00:00): Het ligt aan Plein de Valk, maar officiele adres is Aasterbergerweg 2, Echt, ik zal het zo proberen te wijzigen, maar alsnog graag de stappen zodat het een POI is
eggie (2026-07-17 07:09:23+00:00): Je kunt het ook zo laten.
Het is gewoon vindbaar.
Heb even nu geen computer in de buurt. Dan kijk vanavond.
Zo'n poi op een node of knooo moet dan wel corresponderen met de locatie van het adres.
Groet,
eggie