piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
berndw (2024-07-26 18:55:40+00:00): Achso, mein Changesetkommentar bezog sich nicht auf deine Hinweise, sondern darauf, dass ein Mapper zwar den BÜ als nicht mehr vorhanden eingetragen hat, dabei aber den Feldweg über die Gleise nicht beachtet hat. Das hätte einen Router dazu veranlassen können einen Weg über die Gleise vorzuschlagen.

Dein Hinweis war absolut berechtigt.
Dorfstätte (2024-07-26 19:52:03+00:00): Grundbucheinträge sind auch sehr hilfreich. Es gibt eine Öffentliche Grundbuchkarte, wo alles genau aufgezeichnet ist. Diese ist öffentlich im Netz einsehbar.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-11 17:47:15+00:00): Proszę zapoznaj się z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian i dostosuje się do tych zaleceń
Nakaner (2024-08-13 08:23:48+00:00): Hallo,

läuft da schon ein Planfeststellungsverfahren oder ist das Projekt noch in der Vorplanung?

Viele Grüße

Michael
Paegal (2024-08-13 10:44:12+00:00): Aktuell mehr oder weniger beides. Welche Variante gebaut werden soll, soll noch dieses Jahr beschlossen werden.
canfe (2024-07-26 17:00:05+00:00): I nomi devono essere nomi proprio (Es. Villa Taranto) e non descrittivi, sennò chiameremmo "panchina" ogni panchina...
Inoltre definisci meglio l'oggetto: potrebbe essere uno dei due?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dreservoir_covered

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dstorage_tank

PREGASI RISPONDERE
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154444353
Tomas Straupis (2024-07-28 12:59:23+00:00): Jei kelias yra tiesiog takas, o ne vėžios, tai keičiant highway=track->path reikėtų ir tracktype nuimti. Bet norėčiau kitko paklausti, kodėl 3832 kelio numeris nuimtas (kelias 119782895)? Kiek žiūriu pagal oficialius duomenis, tai jis vis dar 3832?
Metzor (2024-10-25 03:35:18+00:00): Ho townlion,

Frage zu:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/436874971

In der Änderung vor dir an dieser Straße wurde highway auf path geändert mit der Notiz: Ortsdurchfahrt wegen Baustelle für KFZ ca. bis Mai 2025 gesperrt
Für mich heißt das: Fußgänger dürfen weiterhin durch.

Du hast dann highway=path auf highway=construction geändert. Damit sperrst du aber auch die Strecke für den Fußverkehr.

War das Absicht?

Gruß
Metzor
Scout Jens (2024-10-25 04:37:02+00:00): Hallo Metzor, 
der Bereich ist abgesperrt, weil der Bereich erneuert wird. Kein Durchkommen auch für Fahrräder und Fußgänger (und Pferde). Ich wollte da mit dem Fahrrad lang. 
Ich habe deswegen von path auf construction geändert. 
Cooles Tool dieses OSM Deep History. Das kannte ich noch nicht. 
Viele Grüße, Jens
Metzor (2024-10-25 04:41:59+00:00): Danke für deine Antwort! Dann ist ja alles richtig. Fröhliches Mappen noch :-)
FraukeLeo (2024-08-22 16:35:52+00:00): Hallo nortvest, war es Absicht, dass du an der Bahnhofstraße die B 64 unterbrochen hast?
FraukeLeo (2024-08-23 19:07:29+00:00): Ich hab sie mal wieder zusammengelötet, nachdem ich auch keine Sperrung, Baustelle o.ä. ergoogeln konnte.
nortvest (2024-08-28 16:50:56+00:00): Nein, das war wohl ein Versehen, hab ich nicht gemerkt. 
Vielen Dank!
Jordi MF (2024-07-26 14:13:41+00:00): Hola alfred,

Has convertido una autovía en un camino para peatones. Además, has dibujado otro camino encima de dicha autovía. Estos es incorrecto.

Por último, en OSM no es correcto usar nombres descriptivos.

Revierto los cambios
Alfred455 (2024-07-26 14:20:53+00:00): Buenas disculpa las molestias, el túnel es subterráneo y hay un sendero de tierra donde se puede andar sin problema
Jordi MF (2024-07-26 15:02:23+00:00): Perfecto. Pues dibuja los dos caminos de manera independiente: uno subterráneo y otro en superficie, pero intenta no modificar la autovía por la que circulan los vehículos. Tampoco dibujes los caminos superpuestos porque son difíciles de mantener.

Si tienes cualquier duda, no dudes en preguntar.

Saludos!
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-07-28 12:43:52+00:00): 您好，您的编辑破坏了栖霞区的关系导致这个行政区划断开，我在 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154517650 中尝试进行修复了

也望您能在未来的编辑中注意检查（iD在编辑行政区划的时候经常容易损坏关系，建议改用JOSM）

此外，自定义底图的版权问题需要您自行处理

感谢支持
neverdance (2024-07-29 01:21:20+00:00): 确实如此。感谢指导。
因为我发现关于栖霞区的行政区域边界有很多错误，并绘制了新的，并自以为对老的数据修改不会造成什么损失。还是不够了解和熟练。
那么如果要修订原来的错误的行政区边界应该怎么办呢？
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-07-29 13:23:48+00:00): 这次的已经有其他编辑者在尝试修复了，您可以点击这个页面上“关系 (7)”下面的栖霞区查看最新版本

如果想要说如何编辑行政区划，建议在Telegram或者QQ群里咨询（墙外和墙内最常用的两种渠道，或者就只有靠邮件了）

因为这地方不准贴图，而行政区划编辑起关系来还是挺麻烦的

而且强烈推荐您配置一下JOSM，网页上编辑非常痛苦的。

在JOSM里您可以看看北京市和河北省的行政区划关系，您可以看看outer inner分别是什么，在不编辑的情况下琢磨一下它们的作用，然后有问题随时问就好

* t.me/osmchina
* QQ群 290278518
* 邮件 admin@osmchina.org
neverdance (2024-07-29 23:40:46+00:00): 收到。感谢回复。JOSM也一直在用的。
Tomas Straupis (2024-07-28 13:01:09+00:00): Ir čia matau keistus kelių numerių (3836) pakeitimus, kas čia atsitiko?
LY3OO (2024-07-28 17:39:57+00:00): Kirstukas
atidarytas 2024-07-20
Rajoninis kelias 3835 nebeegzistuoja.

Dėl Valstybinės reikšmės automobilių kelių sąrašo patvirtinimo.
https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/TAIS.82066/asr

1 priedas.
III. RAJONINIAI KELIAI
1064 punktas. Neteko galios nuo 2022-04-08
LY3OO (2024-07-28 17:42:48+00:00): Kirstukas sužymėjo kelius kurių numeriai panaikinti, patikrinau priedą ir tikrai 2022-04-08 nemažai kelių neteko numerių.
LY3OO (2024-07-28 17:49:04+00:00): Priedas čia https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/rs/aesupplement/TAIS.82066/LsxEVDzMgo/8c1a9900443a11efb121d2fe3a0eff27/
Tomas Straupis (2024-07-28 18:20:20+00:00): O, ačiū. Susirašysiu/pasitarsiu su GRPK redaktoriais ir tada reikės ir klasifikaciją nuleisti nuo tertiary iki unclassified.
LY3OO (2024-07-28 18:52:53+00:00): Kiek tikrinau palei priedą, tai kirstukas jau visiems tiems keliams sudėjęs pastabas
underscore_en (2024-07-27 05:43:45+00:00): Hi! Thanks for mapping!
Please make sure the buildings are squared and that the buildings do not share side.
Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154445301
mueschel (2024-07-27 15:08:43+00:00): Hi,
why did you delete the information that these shops repair Apple products?
Gregory Peony (2024-11-06 23:53:27+00:00): Again, please do not copy and paste unless the footprints are actually the same shape. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154446042
mga_geo (2024-08-23 09:58:05+00:00): Bonjour Christian,
Il ne faut pas ajouter les arrêts dans les relations route_master cf https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13474508
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
Marc
Gregory Peony (2024-11-06 23:20:52+00:00): Not all of these footprints are valid. A lot of footprints here are inaccurate. Copy and pasting buildings can be valid in situations where building footprints are the same. While I appreciate the idea, these buildings have different footprints and so the footprints should either be drawn from scratch, or modified after pasting so that the footpritns are accurate. Quality > quantity, contribute what you can. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154446526
Gregory Peony (2024-11-06 18:24:40+00:00): Most of the building footprints here appear to be valid but they are not very accurate. Most of these features should have been squared. Please press q after tagging areas as buildings.--- WAY: 1303918490 is not a building. You can tell because it does not cast a similar shadow to nearby buildings. I mapped this as a sports pitch. WAY: 1303918492 does not outline a building. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154446594
silversurfer83 (2024-07-27 20:16:27+00:00): Gucke an! Danke :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154446861
justb (2024-07-26 15:19:09+00:00): TODO: cleanup met crossing highways...
OrdinaryScarlett (2024-07-27 09:09:24+00:00): Hi. I noticed you opened up the interchange between I 69 and I 465. Local sources state that the interchange is due to open next month; in August. Are there any verifiable sources proving this interchange has already opened to traffic? If not, please revert the premature edits. Thanks.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-27 22:31:18+00:00): Reverted. 

Feel free to mark it done once you have a source such as gpx tracks. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSMTracker_(Android)
aTarom (2024-07-26 18:15:07+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, retiro los tags de ngbe:... en desuso
https://taghistory.raifer.tech/?#***/ngbe%3Acodigo&***/ngbe%3Afuente%3Aidg&***/ngbe%3Afuente_idg&***/ngbe%3Agrupo&***/ngbe%3Ahojabcn25&***/ngbe%3Ahuso&***/ngbe%3Aid&***/ngbe%3Alat_ed50&***/ngbe%3Alon_ed50&***/ngbe%3Asubgrupo&***/ngbe%3Atema&***/ngbe%3Atext&***/ngbe%3Atipotexto&***/ngbe%3Aversion&***/ngbe%3Axutm_ed50&***/ngbe%3Ayutm_ed50/

cualquier problema me dices, saludos y feliz mapeo!
Virgile1994 (2024-08-21 07:27:26+00:00): Salut ! Fais attention à tes modifications des arrêts de bus.
Notamment le tag Operator qui n'a pas grand sens. La Semitag n'existe plus depuis plusieurs années, remplacée par M Tag (et M Reso dans quelques semaines). Et en plus ils sont exploitants du réseau, pas des infrastructures ! Les Abris sont gérés par JCDecaux, les poteaux par le SMMAG et les quais par la métropole... L'ex Semitag ne fait que faire rouler des bus et trams (et encore, une grande partie des lignes sont soutraitées à d'autres transporteurs comme Kéolis, VFD ou Perraud)
Aussi, ID a tendance à imposer les tags "Arrêts de bus" sur tous les poteaux et abris de transport en commun...
Virgile1994 (2024-08-21 07:29:59+00:00): Je suis en train de faire un peu de ménage sur les arrêts du réseau en vue du nouveau réseau en septembre. Peux-tu faire attention aux changements de ce genre ? Merci.

Virgile.
george1201 (2026-01-29 22:42:58+00:00): Hallo Amanda. Warum hast du disused:restaurant durch was:restaurant ersetzt? Das scheint StreetComplete nicht zu verstehen.
Siehe Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5138156.
Wenn dort kein Restaurant mehr ist, sollte man alle dazugehörigen Eigenschaften (opening_hours, takeaway, outdoor_seating) entfernen.
fawwaz876 (2024-08-05 15:36:28+00:00): jakarta's status still DKI as for now actually since the presidential decree for moving the capital city isn't out yet
adiatmad (2024-08-06 02:11:44+00:00): Hi @DareDJ, hope you are doing well.

@fawwaz876 is correct. According to Article 73 of the Jakarta Special Region Law, the law kicks in when a presidential decree (Keppres) is issued for relocating the national capital from DKI Jakarta to IKN. As far as I know,  that decree hasn't been issued yet. So, Jakarta's status is still DKI. What do you think, DareDJ?

>> (https://jdih.setkab.go.id/PUUdoc/177198/Salinan_UU_Nomor_2_Tahun_2024.pdf)

>> (https://jdih.setneg.go.id/Produk)
Dawid2849 (2024-08-13 15:20:25+00:00): Połączyłem ścieżkę z drogą parkingową (nawigacja)
neuhausr (2024-07-26 16:23:01+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I noticed you tagged these points as amenity=post_box, which is meant for outgoing mail. I think these are actually boxes where mail gets delivered, which should be amenity=letter_box. See the wiki page for more info https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dletter_box  Happy mapping!
CodeInSpace (2024-07-26 16:31:10+00:00): Thanks for the correction, fixed in 154451491
VLD549 (2024-11-27 13:50:31+00:00): Hi, could you provide a link of some sort that shows it to be Schauselbroek? I only find results that show it to be Schouselbroek.

Thank you!
Tom Ameye (2024-11-27 19:21:46+00:00): Hi VLD549, interesting question.
First of all: did I add ‘Schauselbroek’ ? I have no recollection, but could be wrong.
There are many references for both Schauselbroek (Atlas des chemins vicinaux 1841, Popp 1842-1879, Vandermaelen 1846-1854, NGI 1969 & 1981) and Schouselbroek (NGI 1904 & 1939). The oldest one I found (Atlas des chemins vicinaux 1841) is Schauselbroek. I also found one reference for Schonselbroek (NGI 1873).
Therefore I opt for Schauselbroek, but will add the alternative names.
Best regards,
Tom
VLD549 (2024-12-13 12:07:19+00:00): Thanks!
mueschel (2024-07-27 15:06:27+00:00): Could you point us to the discussion and approval of this large-scale edit of tags? You invented a couple of new tags here, e.g. tyres:repair. What is wrong with the established tags like service:vehicle:tyres_repair?
Pieter Vander Vennet (2024-07-27 16:16:18+00:00): Hi,

There is no discussion as of now.

Currently, the 'repair'-tagging is a mess. There were multiple wikipages, each indicating their own schema to indicate what is repaired where (namely "repair=yes|no|only", "repair=<item>"  "<item>:repair=yes" and "service:<item>:repair=yes"

This changeset is a partial cleanup by changing all "repair=item" into "item:repair=yes", but it definitively isn't the end of the cleanup effort.

Note that part of the problem here is that some special cases are not documented well. For example, you indicate "service:vehicle:tyres_repair=yes", but this one has about 200 entries; whereas "service:vehicle:tyres=yes" has over 9000. 

If you know of other such special cases, please, link to them in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:repair
mueschel (2024-07-27 16:24:13+00:00): service:vehicle:tyres and service:vehicle:tyres_repair are different things.  
Your edits produced many strange things, e.g. places that repair "oil" or "parts" and tags with spelling mistakes. 
Such a change needs proper planning, discussion and approval.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2024-07-27 16:32:46+00:00): I've made a proper forum post about this, I propose we take the discussion there.
PcMouse1 (2024-07-26 15:52:11+00:00): wrong changeset comment, added buildings to esso source survey
aTarom (2024-07-26 17:18:35+00:00): Hi, new tags have appeared suddenly
> appliance:repair
> boiler:repair
> electronics:repair
> oldtimer:repair
> radiator:repair
> small_electric_vehicle:repair
> tyres:repair
I haven't found out where they were discussed, can you let me know, to adapt my revisions in Spain, to the new scheme?
Cheers
Pieter Vander Vennet (2024-07-26 17:54:58+00:00): Hi,

There are many "repair" schemas in use. One is `repair=yes|no|only|brand|only_sold` which is widely used to indicate if a shop does repairs.

However, `repair=` has also been used to indicate various items which are replaced at the given location.

The second is `<item>:repair`, which already is in de-facto use.

The third is `service:<item>:repair` which is also widely used and is supported by the iD editor.

This changeset changes `repair=<item*>` into `<item>:repair=yes`.

I'm in favour of unifying `service:<item>:repair` and `<item>:repair` too, but those should go through discussion first.

Note that all three schemes were documented in the wiki, but at different locations; I'm unifying them under https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:repair
TrickyFoxy (2024-07-29 09:38:17+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154553900
mcliquid (2024-07-26 17:38:00+00:00): Hi, gibt es die südliche Brücke nicht mehr?
ajidsvdtrd (2024-07-27 17:47:25+00:00): Hi,
insgesamt gibt es zwei Brücken. eine kurze und eine 60 m. Fälschlicherweise war 1166312136 ebenfalls als dritte Brücke eingetragen.
mcliquid (2024-07-28 09:15:40+00:00): Danke dir!
Black_Diamond (2024-07-26 20:33:10+00:00): Why did you specify that the sidewalk has an asphalt surface? It's a concrete sidewalk.
osm_monkey (2024-07-26 22:56:38+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out.
How do I update/modify my change? (I'm using streetcomplete to just click on options)
Black_Diamond (2024-07-27 02:08:24+00:00): I typically use the online iD editor on OpenStreetMap in a web browser. After you log in with your account, it's fairly easy to edit it here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=154450909#map=18/37.28596/-121.95133

If it's not easy to figure out, I can make the change for you.
Black_Diamond (2024-07-26 20:36:01+00:00): Only the parking lot seems to be asphalt. The entrance from Winchester looks like red concrete. Can you please split this road and update the surfaces to match what can be seen from the aerial imagery?
osm_monkey (2024-07-28 15:07:02+00:00): I believe I made correct changes.
Thanks for pointing out iD.
Black_Diamond (2024-07-28 20:05:11+00:00): Looks great! Thank you!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-08 09:28:49+00:00): Hello!

You used
colour=braun
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9365574212/history

Have you maybe meant
colour=brown
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
emersonveenstra (2024-07-27 11:42:10+00:00): Hi there,

Usually nodes need more than just a name tag for data consumers to understand what they are. Are these junction names, or trail markers, or something else?
xkcd461 (2024-07-27 14:35:59+00:00): Hi, they are trail markers for numbered spots on the park map. It looks like they should be information:guidepost then? Some would also be information:map.
blacx (2024-07-26 22:37:30+00:00): hola, et recomano que et posis la capa topografica d'ICGC de fons i afegeixis totes les adreces, que catastro se'n deixa moltes
rogama25 (2024-07-26 22:48:16+00:00): Vale, lo revisaré. Ando con ayuda de la herramienta de migrado del Catastro para ayudarme a hacer rápido una importación del layout general de los edificios
felipeeugenio (2024-07-26 22:01:30+00:00): Vandalismo reversado
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154453443
Alyssa Chance (2024-09-25 13:09:50+00:00): These trails are abandoned and should be removed.
DorneyLake123 (2024-07-26 17:38:26+00:00): Accidentally enabled "review requested". didn't notice until just after I uploaded the CS, unless it was automated?
Leo Slager (2024-07-26 23:54:01+00:00): railway abandoned in oldenzaal ?
Dat is vorig jaar nieuw aangelegd !!

Kijk eens naar de tags:
openingdate=2023-12-10
Leo Slager (2024-07-26 23:57:18+00:00): Als je hier niet bekend bent en niet ter plaatse bent geweest, ga dan geen wijzigingen aanbrengen !!
geogidon (2024-07-27 00:50:29+00:00): Hi Leo, thanks for this correction!
aTarom (2024-07-26 19:07:18+00:00): Hi, can you please check this tag?
"Twitter"="Lucharence"
at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/745235302/history
I want to correct the key
"Twitter" to "contact:twitter" or "twitter"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:twitter
but I can't find the user, is this correct?
Cheers
felipeeugenio (2024-07-26 18:24:15+00:00): Hola John
La altura del cerro va con un tag aparte (ele=) del nombre. 
Y por favor cuidar la ortografía. Cóndores es con tilde. 
Saludos
Black_Diamond (2024-07-26 20:30:14+00:00): Can you please clarify what you changed here? It looks like you moved the road. Traditionally, the road goes down the middle, like the other side and not to the right shoulder that you did in your changes.
Black_Diamond (2024-07-28 03:21:11+00:00): Since I didn't see a response, I've gone ahead and moved the road back to where it was. Roads are supposed to be drawn down the center of the actual lanes and not to one side. That change is here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154504717
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-07-29 04:18:06+00:00): Thank you so much for fixing the mistake format.
EP_Repair (2024-09-19 16:08:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 156828296 where the changeset comment is: Reverting street name changes which include abbreviated name or are on non-public roads
EP_Repair (2024-09-19 16:10:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 156828359 where the changeset comment is: Reverting street name changes which include abbreviated name or are on non-public roads
grzegorzmilosz (2024-07-26 18:44:27+00:00): Rozdzielenie pasów ruchu wynika z rozdzielenia pasów ruchu wysepkami tzw. Azylami dla pieszych Z wysokimi krawężnikami i zastosowaniem permanentnych materiałów w postaci kostki brukowej. następnie pojawienie się 2 pasów po stronie południowej z racji utworzenia lewoskrętu w ulicę rybacką. Układ dróg w tym miejscu  jest ,, hybrydą '' ze skrzyżowania Zacisznej i Iwaszkiewicza gdzie pasy ruchu rozdzielone są permanentnymi wysepkami a pasem do lewo skrętu pojawiającego się na zjedzie za rondem na lipowej w stronę mostu na rzece Oława. Tak to najlepiej potrafię wytłumaczyć wprowadzone przez mnie zmiany na potwierdzenie dodatkowo dołączam zdjęcie:      https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EED-UXucj4LMtxUD_v2RppYDDnjYq_Me/view?usp=drive_link
mavl (2024-08-07 11:02:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154930045 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16542].
mavl (2024-08-07 11:02:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154930045 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16542].
mavl (2024-08-07 11:02:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154930045 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16542].
ais523 (2024-07-26 19:38:45+00:00): Forgot to post the source: I surveyed the path, and also used aerial imagery to get the routes correct. (The "crossing" warnings are pre-existing and for a location I didn't survey, so I didn't do anything about those.)
mavl (2024-08-07 11:02:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154930045 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16542].
Lumikeiju (2024-07-27 01:37:22+00:00): Looks like https://map.osm.wikidata.link/ isn't working properly, so note that this changeset introduced no actual changes at all.
ChillyDL (2024-07-29 23:17:11+00:00): Hallo spillunke noch einmal,
ich hatte dich neulich schon einmal angeschrieben und im Changeset kommentiert, dort zu den Großsteingräbern Theesen und Friedensau. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153582652) 

Hier ist es wieder ganz ähnlich: Du zeichnest ein "Großsteingrab Grabow" ein, das wie neulich das "Großsteingrab Theesen" anderswo nicht bekannt ist, auch nicht im Denkmalatlas Sachsen-Anhalts. Bitte gib deine Quellen für deine Änderungen und Eintragungen an.

Konkret: Gib bitte hier im Änderungssatz noch an, woher du die Informationen über und Position des Großsteingrabs hier und des Großsteingrabs Theeßen hast. Wenn nicht klar ist, wie zuverlässig und rechtssicher die Eintragungen in OSM sind und, müssen sie wieder gelöscht werden, sonst gefährden sie das Projekt. Und das wäre ja schade.

Und, wie gesagt, Großsteingräber werden in OSM als archaeological_site=megalith getaggt, nicht als =tumulus, selbst wenn sie noch einen Grabhügel haben.

Bitte melde dich doch mal,
viele Grüße
ChillyDL
ChillyDL (2024-07-29 23:21:03+00:00): Ah, und danke für die jetzt aussagekräftigeren Zusammenfassungen an deinen Änderungssätzen!