piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Robin Zyx (2024-04-23 07:14:17+00:00): Thanks for noting this. I have just tried to fix it for the second time, but still I'm not sure if it's entirely correct. It's a building and it is not an industrial space. But now I have to wait for a few hours or more to see if OSM renders it as a building to be halfway sure?
euroPathfinder (2024-04-21 10:32:37+00:00): Hi Michael123!,
Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und danke für Deinen Beitrag. Ich habe die Ladestation ein wenig angepasst damit die richtigen Anschlüsse korrekt erfasst sind. Du hattest einfach alles unter dem Tag capacity=* abgelegt, der eigentlich dafür gedacht ist anzugeben wieviele Autos gleichzeitig geladen werden können, aber nicht mit welchem Anschluss. Gibt es denn vor Ort die Möglichkeit 3 Autos gleichzeitig mit den 3 Anschlüssen zu laden?

Viele Grüße
euroPathfinder
Michael123! (2024-04-21 21:34:21+00:00): Hi! Ich habe den Eintrag mit der App "Go Map!!" erstellt. Habe mich gefragt, wie ich die Anschlüsse darstellen soll. Leider sind die Attribute "socket:" dort nicht verfügbar. Habe auch nach CCS, CHAdeMO gesucht und nichts gefunden...
Hier können höchstwahrscheinlich 3 Fahrzeuge gleichzeitig laden. Ich habe an einem CCS - Anschluss geladen und gleichzeitig einer am TYP2 (nicht Typ1). Der CHAdeMO war frei.
Also: 3 Anschlüsse: CCS (50 kW), CHAdeMO (50 kW), Typ2 (22 kW).
Auf https://www.goingelectric.de/stromtankstellen/Deutschland/Waldmohr/Marktplatz-Bruchstrasse-11/34858/ findet man diese Ladesäule..
euroPathfinder (2024-04-22 10:53:27+00:00): Hi Michael,
Alles klar, danke für die Infos, ich habe basierend darauf mal noch ein paar Verbesserungen gemacht.

VG euroPathfinder
Filip009 (2024-04-22 11:00:52+00:00): Zdravím, čo ste chcel dosiahnuť touto zmenou? Nechápem prečo ste vytvoril novú reláciu chráneného areálu a zo starej relácie odstránil najväčšiu časť.
Bolt026 (2024-09-26 12:11:33+00:00): Hi adas,
I have a question for this short segment of Bocianowo street https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182356942. Is it any reason why it doesn’t have the oneway=yes tag on it? 
Thank you! 
Catalina
Yitzchak M (2024-09-19 15:52:40+00:00): היי. לפני כמה חודשים אתה שינית את ה WAY
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75501574/history#map=17/32.600195/35.132325
שנים רבות זה היה שביל שחור ופתאום אתה העברת את השביל שחור לדרך עפר המקביל. אתה ראית את השינוי הזה עם עיניים שלך בפירוש?
Koreller (2024-04-22 19:30:07+00:00): Where did you have the information of name street ? From Esri ?
theman7777 (2024-04-22 22:12:30+00:00): Sorry about that, I put ESRI as the source out of habit. I got the names from here: https://kcnawatch.org/newstream/1713308938-866129174/부흥강국의-전면적발전기를-상징하는-인민의-리상/ and here: https://www.nknews.org/2024/04/kim-jong-un-debuts-new-song-praising-himself-at-grand-opening-of-housing-project/
Koreller (2024-04-23 08:21:32+00:00): Thanks a lot for you response, KCNAwatch from NKNews it's a very good source ! Thanks for this changeset !
Sandal man (2024-04-25 06:24:45+00:00): Hola,
Benvingut a OSM i gràcies per contribuir :-)
Però es pot parar atenció a les connexions quan es cartografia i no dibuixar carreteres les unes sobre les altres?
A Xixona he restaurat una sèrie de punts
FroschForscher (2026-01-24 13:23:24+00:00): Hallo Wolfgang Holtz heißt das Second-Hand-Geschäft hier "ohne Namen" oder ist es ohne Namen?
Wolfgang Holtz (2026-01-24 18:04:57+00:00): Ist ohne Namen.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-21 08:00:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150290657 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some invalid name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/108496/13 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15970
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-21 07:59:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150290657 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some invalid name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/108496/13 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15970
Liqid1010 (2024-12-14 15:29:44+00:00): Vratil som niektore zmeny z tychto dovodov:
bude sa pouziva prefix alebo zvlast tag, nemozu sa pozuit naraz aj tag abandoned=yes aj prefix disused:aerialway, nehovoriac o tom ze disused a abandoned si odporuju. Prefix sa v tomto pripade nema pouzivat, pretoze lanovka, aj ked nefunkcna, stale lanovkou je a prefix znemoznuje renderovanie daneho tagu, na tieto ucely vznikol zvlast tag abandoned=yes, aby vyznamne a stale existujuce prvky boli nadalej renderovane, ale bolo jasne ze uz nesluzia svojmu ucelu.
isidor (2024-12-17 14:52:16+00:00): Hmm, takze "tagging for renderer" ?
A precoze sa pouziva pre nepouzivane zeleznice https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned:railway ale pre lanovky uz nesmie?
Liqid1010 (2024-12-17 18:53:14+00:00): Nie je to "tagging for rederer", pretoze je rozdiel ci daný objekt ešte je tým objektom alebo nie. Napríklad "abandoned" krcma by sa takto oznacovat nemala, lebo uz krcmou nie je, no lanovka aj ked opustena je stale lanovkou a je viditelna na mieste a v krajine, a je indentifikovatelna. Nieco z wiki co som nasiel:
1. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts "...abandoned=yes is well established for use with man-made physical features like buildings or objects which are visible in the landscape, whether or not they are disused or functional."
2. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned "The abandoned=yes tag is used for (...) man-made features that have fallen into serious disrepair, (...) *yet remain identifiable as the same feature.*"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-21 07:59:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150290657 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some invalid name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/108496/13 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15970
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-21 08:00:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150290657 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some invalid name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/108496/13 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15970
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-21 08:00:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150290657 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some invalid name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/108496/13 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15970
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-21 08:00:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150290657 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some invalid name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/108496/13 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15970
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-21 08:00:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150290657 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some invalid name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/108496/13 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15970
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-21 07:59:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150290657 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some invalid name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/108496/13 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15970
vmanulik (2024-05-02 10:38:20+00:00): What a fun naming invalid an official renaming by Kyiv City council. You showed perfectly lower Google search skills and pro-russian mindset.
pippo6 (2025-04-28 09:15:04+00:00): anche qui, vedi che la strada è piena di avvisi che direction=Napoli non è corretto

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#loc=13/40.91038/14.1738&level=1%2C2%2C3&item=9006
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-21 08:00:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150290657 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some invalid name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/108496/13 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15970
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-21 08:00:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150290657 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some invalid name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/108496/13 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15970
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-21 08:00:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150290657 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some invalid name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/108496/13 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15970
zstadler (2025-05-06 17:35:54+00:00): שלום יניב,

תודה על תרומתך למיפוי ב OSM!

אני תוהה מה מקור התגית
colour=black?

בצילומים שבאתר קקל
https://www.kkl.org.il/research_and_development_projects/projects-center/yokneam-forest-promanade.aspx
לא נראים שלטי הכוונה בשחור
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-21 07:59:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150290657 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some invalid name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/108496/13 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15970
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-21 08:00:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150290657 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some invalid name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/108496/13 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15970
Barroszt (2024-06-13 18:08:41+00:00): :(
dadavid (2024-04-24 11:02:28+00:00): Hi Gulliei, 

du hast hier [1] eingetragen, dass die Viktoria-Luisen-Straße keine Einbahnstraße (mehr?) ist. Ist es denn immernoch eine "unechte" Einbahnstraße mit Einfahrt verboten Schildern an der Nordseite? Die Abbiege/Einfahrtbeschränkung ist soweit ich das sehe nämlich noch nicht eingetragen.

viele Grüße und weiterhin happy mapping

David

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25801187
Gulliei (2024-04-25 12:59:43+00:00): Hallo,
genau richtig. Es ist eine unechte Einbahnstraße, also man darf von der Seite Wallerfanger Straße nicht einfahren, der Rest ist in beide Richtungen erlaubt. So ist die Straße übrigens schon seit sehr langer Zeit. Ganz ganz früher war es mal umgekehrt, also Einfahrt von der anderen Seite verboten, aber immer in beide Richtungen befahrbar.
Grüße
ArgyleZombie (2025-01-03 11:53:49+00:00): I recall Stop-N-Go having air available on the east side of the building.  Did you check there?  They may not have it anymore; that was years ago.
OldWeirdWoman (2025-01-08 16:56:43+00:00): Excellent question. I can't be certain that I checked there. I'll back it out.
sahshoor (2024-04-21 18:23:10+00:00): Forgot to say the review request is because I don't understand the relation change to the bicycle path.
Glassman (2024-04-30 20:25:41+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150284719
Glassman (2024-04-30 20:26:20+00:00): I have reverted all of your additions of the golf course. OSM is only for verifiable features.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150284719
Mashin (2024-04-21 17:20:45+00:00): Hi again,
I see that you are updating shape of lot of objects. In this case please do not delete the old object (e.g. school ground) but change it shape instead by adding nodes or dragging the existing once.

Alternatively you can install utilsplugin2 in JOSM and use Replace geometry function that will do that for you:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/utilsplugin2#Replace_geometry_(Ctrl+Shift+G)
akimapbuilder (2024-04-22 06:29:15+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset.  Try to follow building footprints and match the geometry.
seattlefyi (2024-04-22 00:36:55+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! I looked at your 3 changesets so far, and they all look really good! For this insurance company, it looks like the name should likely consistently have slashes between each name, or just spaces. Very minor issue, tough to see in the imagery. Thanks, hope to see more edits!
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-18 15:42:06+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150285337
utteringmute (2024-06-20 05:47:27+00:00): Shop identified but should modify name since shop is common brand.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150285620
utteringmute (2024-06-20 05:49:59+00:00): Amenity identified with correct tag.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150285636
euroPathfinder (2024-04-21 10:05:01+00:00): Hi Vegetavles und herzlich willkommen bei OSM!

Falls Du als neuer Mapper Fragen hast melde Dich gerne. Wir haben im Saarland seit neustem eine lokale Gruppe - die Links stehen in meinem Profil, schau gerne einmal vorbei.

Ansonsten vielleicht noch als Tipp: ich habe auch schon viel mit OsmAnd gemappt, allerdings gibt es dort kaum Unterstützung bei den Tags. Am Anfang kann ich daher insbesondere EveryDoor als App empfehlen, wenn es komplizierter wird auch Vespucci.

Viele Grüße und frohes Mappen,
euroPathfinder
nw520 (2024-04-27 00:33:59+00:00): Hallo Vegetavles, mir ist nicht recht klar, welchen Zweck die Änderung der Öffnungszeiten hat. Du hast die Öffnungszeiten für die vorlesungsfreie Zeit verworfen und ferner ist das Format auch inkorrekt. Ich habe daher deine Änderungen revertiert. Bitte antworte hier, falls das deines Erachtens inkorrekt ist.
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-23 16:47:43+00:00): Good accurate mapping, keep contributing.#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150285753
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-21 03:30:21+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11834093844

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
nevw (2024-04-21 06:58:42+00:00): Is there a real building located here?
nevw (2024-05-01 02:08:38+00:00): no response, reverted
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-23 16:40:29+00:00): Good and accurate mapping.#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150286519
nevw (2024-04-21 11:25:54+00:00): Hi, there are two ways named 20the Avenue.
Is this correct?
kimo (2024-04-22 00:14:32+00:00): Probably not, but I don't have an appropriately licensed map to check. As I've added camp_pitch on way 862993302 I suspect this is correct. I don't know what way 27403069 should be called.
nevw (2024-04-22 01:26:45+00:00): Ok, thanks. I'll send an email to National Parks.
nevw (2024-04-23 09:26:56+00:00): Parks Victoria confirmed 20th Avenue is in the Shools Area as shown on their maps so have deleted the name on the track through the lodges area.
kimo (2024-04-23 23:27:57+00:00): Thanks for following this up.
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-23 16:38:44+00:00): Good and accurate mapping.#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150286638
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-26 17:41:33+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha

But Also, Try to Draw accurate Square-shaped Buildings. Use the "Q" Key to Change your building to Square.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150286939
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-26 17:35:19+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is not in-between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. #Osmcha#OMGuru

Draw just the roof outline of a building, not the entire area. Also, Try to Draw accurate Square-shaped Buildings. Use the "Q" Key to Change your building to Square.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150287025
Allison P (2024-04-21 05:09:06+00:00): Wrong comment, meant "removed bad name"
mcliquid (2024-04-21 06:28:00+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Vinber-Pro (2024-04-21 08:49:33+00:00): Hi,
welcome on OpenStreetMap.

I'm not sure about what you want to say with Home, it's name of the place ? or you're home ?

and a rest_area it's this https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway=rest%20area?uselang=fr

regards
michael60634 (2024-04-21 06:06:29+00:00): Clarification on the changeset comments: This changeset reverts a changeset that reverted important road tags.
Hufkratzer (2024-04-21 18:25:12+00:00): Hi,
This area is too small for a racecourse, compare  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Asport=horse_racing and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Racecourse_(horse_racing)
woodpeck (2024-05-27 11:47:24+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1274557269 (a oneway street that cannot be entered) really an unclassified road or maybe just a left-over part of a construction site?
JanezPavelZebovec (2025-07-30 09:50:12+00:00): Pozdravljeni!
Ali morda še veste, kaj je bil vaš vir za imenovanje cerkvice/kapele "Sv. Filip in Jakob"?
Vaše poimenovanje sem našel na Najdi.si: https://zemljevid.najdi.si/poi/POI17376/sv-filip-in-jakob.
Na https://www.druzina.si/zupnija/zupnijska-cerkev-sv-marije-vnebovzete-apace je vpisana kapela sv. Marije Pomagaj v Žepovci (vendar natančnejši položaj ni določen), na Googlovih zemljevidih (https://maps.app.goo.gl/LNJCmmE1xaX11A5z5) pa je označeno, da je ta kapela sv. Marije Pomagaj na mestu, kjer imamo trenutno označeno cerkvico Sv. Filipa in Jakoba.
Vprašanje je, kako potrditi, katero ime je pravo.
JanezPavelZebovec (2025-07-30 09:51:44+00:00): Tudi na https://geohub.gov.si/ghapp/giskd/ je kapela Marijina, kar je najbolj zanesljiv vir.
Joško Horvat (2025-07-30 16:34:04+00:00): Hm, res je. Leta 2006 je prešla občina Apače iz Mariborske škofije na Murskosoboško. Verjetno je vsled tega kapela dobila drugo ime. Tole mi je vrglo iz ChatGpt: Kapela v Žepovcih je opisana kot posvečena "sv. Marije Pomagaj" oziroma "Marija Pomočnica kristjanov", kot del župnijskih evidenc Župnije Apače. -> Sem spremenil ime in stavbo v kapelo. Me veseli, da sva rešila zagato, na internetu obstajajo za to kapelo še več imen. (eno je kapela sv. Florjana-zaradi freske nad vhodom v kapelo)
Joško Horvat (2025-07-30 17:17:05+00:00): Hm, meni zanesljiv vir je portal Družine. Sem bil  na Poljanski 6 , Lj velikokrat ...
fortera_au (2024-04-21 07:13:58+00:00): Should the service road actually be named Kingston RV Park? I would have thought that a separate way surrounding the park, or a node, would be more appropriate, since it seems like an odd name for a road.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150288475
NeisBot (2024-04-21 07:04:02+00:00): Hello 蛋白质先生, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
map per (2024-04-21 16:26:16+00:00): Because of review_requested:
This change looks good, thanks!
FooFooBar (2024-04-22 16:19:15+00:00): Same here, no complaints. Welcome to OSM!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150289117
Andrea Musuruane (2024-04-21 11:49:22+00:00): Ciao. Come hai determinato la larghezza di queste strade? Ad esempio, per "Via dei Cardatori" hai inserito width=4. Però se uso le ortofoto per misurare la larghezza della strada, ottengo 7m circa. Ciao, Andrea
Gianni Bragante (2024-04-21 12:53:42+00:00): Ciao Andrea, ho stimato la larghezza delle strade in base come può passare comodamente un'auto o due affiancate.
E' accettabile fare delle stime in questo modo oppure preferisci che senza una misura accurata lascio il valore vuoto?
Su quella strada c'è anche il marciapiede, quindi per questo forse hai ottenuto 7 metri. Il marciapiede non va contatto, vero?
Andrea Musuruane (2024-04-21 13:05:59+00:00): Ciao Gianni. La stima l'ho fatta escludendo il marciapiede (la wiki parla di "width of the carriageway from kerb to kerb", quindi esclusi i marciapiedi, se presenti, ma incluse piste ciclabili e parcheggi). C'è una app che si può usare da StreetComplete per fare queste stime: StreetMeasure. Ciao, Andrea
Gianni Bragante (2024-04-21 13:09:01+00:00): Qual'è il nome della app che si può usare da StreetComplete? Lo sto usando da poco e non lo conosco ancora molto bene.
Andrea Musuruane (2024-04-21 13:12:21+00:00): StreetMeasure https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.westnordost.streetmeasure
Gianni Bragante (2024-04-21 13:16:47+00:00): Grazie, la proverò!
map per (2024-04-21 16:26:41+00:00): Because of review_requested:
This edit looks good, thanks!
UltimaSasuke (2024-06-27 12:21:52+00:00): Totally false. K.Banon is part of Ibis Hotal left to HumanFab...
nevw (2024-04-21 11:33:44+00:00): Hi, two of these paths still have the razed:highway tag.
You need to delete those tags if you have physically verified that you are able to still use the ways.
Op'tRad (2025-10-21 19:48:53+00:00): Please: check out 
https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telefoonnummer
For example:
'+31 20 1234567	internationale notatie'
In my case at 't Vossenhol in Daarlerveen, +31 546 607103 was good: international +31, regional 546 and local 607103. Why did you split it into 607_103 ?
I know that it is often written like that, but it is not according to what it should in OSM - in my opinion.
maraf24 (2024-04-27 14:01:03+00:00): Dlaczego usunąłeś informacje o strefie zamieszkania?
I to nie są drobne poprawki, tylko dziwne zmiany kategorii dróg.
user_20731664 (2024-04-27 17:33:03+00:00): Dziwny to jesteś ty
maraf24 (2024-04-27 20:00:33+00:00): Nadal nie dostałem informacji na jakiej podstawie zostały wykonane te zmiany i 
dlaczego zniknęło living_street.
:-} (2024-04-27 20:05:11+00:00): Stan faktyczny
BCNorwich (2024-04-22 07:20:59+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your new highway is duplicating an existing highway (and is probably fiction). This would disrupt routing so I've reverted/removed the change.

Please don't add fiction to OSM. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
silversurfer83 (2024-04-21 12:07:26+00:00): Gude :)

wenn dort, wo die Sparkasse war, jetzt quasi leere Büros sind, bietet sich hier an die lifecycle prefixes einzusetzen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150290578