piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
MxxCon (2023-02-22 04:00:42+00:00): Hello.
Please note that crosswalks with traffic lights and crosswalks with stop signs have different tags. Please pay attention to select the correct ones when you tag them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132843570
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
rondoncamacho (2023-02-21 16:30:52+00:00): Fuente: http://igvsb.gob.ve/igvsb/servicio/16#10/8.6997/-67.2371
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
user_18526234 (2023-02-21 18:58:57+00:00): Hello 5R-MFT,
I seems that you have added or eddited some landuse=village_green. Please read:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=village_green
Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
Please read:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=greenery
For a list of alternative tags.

The object in question is:
https://www.osm.org/way/1148274006

Greetings Tjuro
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
MxxCon (2023-02-22 04:28:35+00:00): Hello.
When iD is warning you that a sidewalk is crossing water, don't just click "make a ford" to make that warning go away. :) This is most definitely not a ford, but a bridge. These sections of sidewalks should've been tagged as such..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132844081
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
user_18526234 (2023-02-21 18:58:57+00:00): Hello Louis-Paul,
I seems that you have added or eddited some landuse=village_green. Please read:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=village_green
Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
Please read:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=greenery
For a list of alternative tags.

The object in question is:
https://www.osm.org/way/1148275390

Greetings Tjuro
gendy54 (2023-04-01 17:46:24+00:00): Bonjour,

Les tags addr:city et addr:postcode sont inutiles sur les adresses car redondantes avec les limites administratives
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Langlaeufer (2023-02-21 19:31:08+00:00): Das ist keine Straße.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132844622
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-22 01:13:47+00:00): This item still has a water tag.  It should remain.  I have added it back.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132844646
Langlaeufer (2023-02-21 19:30:00+00:00): Privatwege müssen nicht gelöscht werden. Man könnte auch access=private setzen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132844661
wkdgs (2023-04-12 14:05:18+00:00): Da hier keine Antwort kam und man die Einfahrten auf den Luftbildern gut erkennen kann, habe ich die Änderungen rückgängig gemacht.
Langlaeufer (2023-02-21 19:27:34+00:00): Woran sind die Nutzungseinschränkungen erkennbar?  Access=no ist falsch!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132844707
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
wkdgs (2023-04-12 14:04:36+00:00): Auch hier gilt, dass private Hofeinfahrten durchaus gemappt werden können. 

Da man die Einfahrten auf den Luftbildern gut erkennen kann, habe die Änderungen daher rückgängig gemacht.
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Langlaeufer (2023-02-21 18:39:34+00:00): Bitte schau dir mal die Doku von access an.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132845334
Langlaeufer (2023-02-21 18:40:09+00:00): 2 Meter Breite glaube ich nicht.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132845334
Langlaeufer (2023-02-21 18:40:33+00:00): Auch dieser Weg ist breiter als 2 m
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132845334
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
eggie (2023-02-21 17:32:26+00:00): Dag Eclips....
De regel name=..... kun je beter verwijderen..
Alleen operator gebruiken bij een laadpaal.
Mvg
Eggie
Eclippsis (2023-02-21 17:36:59+00:00): Hi Eggie,

Aangepast, bedankt weer.

MvG,
Eclippsis
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
angys (2023-02-21 17:12:56+00:00): own visit
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Noen (2023-02-23 20:02:05+00:00): Hei og velkommen til Opsenstreetmap! Jeg ser ikke helt hva du forsøker å oppnå med dette endringssettet. Det er tilbakestilt.
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
marc__marc (2024-10-11 12:48:10+00:00): Bonjour,
j'ignore ta source (puisque tu ne l'as pas renseigné) mais j'ai l'impression que la prise chademo 250 kW pourrait être une typo, l'opendanta renseigne des puissances de 50 kW (sans doute chademo) 100 kW (sans doute comboCss) et 22 kW (sans doute type2)
Cordialement,
Marc
rhtb0 (2023-02-22 04:10:53+00:00): 안녕하세요.
Hyumi 계정과 동일인이신가요?
eggie (2023-02-21 17:48:57+00:00): Hi... you are sure this is a no name motorcycle shop? I think it s a familyhouse.
Greetz
eggie
HoJoGw (2025-05-27 20:30:52+00:00): Any official evidence? Or simply a joke? :-)
APneunzehn74 (2025-05-28 04:08:01+00:00): Was genau meinst du damit?
user_18526234 (2023-02-21 18:58:55+00:00): Hello Buraddo,
I seems that you have added or eddited some landuse=village_green. Please read:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=village_green
Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
Please read:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=greenery
For a list of alternative tags.

The object in question is:
https://www.osm.org/way/189500449

Greetings Tjuro
Buraddo (2023-02-22 08:32:17+00:00): Hello,
In this changeset I just moved some nodes, the object it's been the same for 10 years. 
I agree that village_green is not the best tag, but I am not sure what to replace it with. It refers to green areas around apartment buildings, consisting in maintained grass, hedges and trees.
However this tag is used all over the city, it should be changed everywhere...
rohieb (2023-02-21 17:50:05+00:00): Ebenso brand=Edeka gesetzt, damit es zum brand:wikidata passt. "E-Center" wird nirgendwo auf der Edeka-Homepage benutzt.
user_18526234 (2023-02-21 18:58:56+00:00): Hello maraf24,
I seems that you have added or eddited some landuse=village_green. Please read:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=village_green
Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
Please read:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=greenery
For a list of alternative tags.

The object in question is:
https://www.osm.org/way/789864272

Greetings Tjuro
maraf24 (2023-02-21 19:39:02+00:00): Wiki definition of village green is garbage.
Please put me on the "don't comment this user changesets" list of your bot.
prettyapathetic (2023-02-22 20:03:32+00:00): Regarding the Williamson Rd edit, the designated walk/bike way is separately drawn as Mill Mountain Greenway and runs parallel along this portion, so I would not recommend having the road as a designated walk/bike way.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-21 13:35:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148290966

shop=storage_units ? Is it simply a shop=storage_rental? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%253Dstorage_rental Or is it selling boxes/packaging?

If it is certainly shop=storage_rental - would it be safe to mass-retag it without inspecting individual cases for all objects tagged this way?
maxolasersquad (2023-12-21 15:59:07+00:00): I believe in this changeset I simply upgraded an existing node to an area.

I agree that shop=storage_units doesn't make sense here, as that is not even a valid tag.

Regarding mass editing, I'm not sure. That's probably best to be added as a MapRoulette challenge if there are a lot of them.

I have fixed the tag on this area.
GOwin (2023-02-22 00:46:30+00:00): Hi @edwin_13. You appear to be adding spurious "community centres", which appear to have names that might be ref tags, and possibly a device or street cabinet for a telco?

Can you please elaborate, and perhaps we can help you map these things better in the future?
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-02-21 18:33:07+00:00): Here 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132108650
under point number 3 I meant that you don't need that kindergarten node at all. Kindergarten already exists as an area https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/783376505
and there is no point in having both. I've removed it.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941