piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mrpulley (2024-02-20 03:13:24+00:00): I have just received a private message from someone from NPWS. In summary, NPWS has officially closed the track, don't add it again. (There was nothing on the ground at survey to indicate it was a closed track.) If it is genuinely closed, then access=discouraged may be best changed to access=no, or possibly use the 'disused:' prefix. My edit had been discussed on the mailing list prior to reversion - I'll send a note back to the mailing list for further discussion.
tonyf1 (2024-02-20 04:37:19+00:00): A message to ranger Stephen Stenberg and to ranger Patrick with whom I had the phone conversation. Please engage with us in discussion. This issue will never be resolved by removing tracks with no note or a note that the tracks do not exist. It is a pointless way for Parks to attempt resolution, OSM has much higher labour resources than Parks, Parks could never win an "edit war" and we do not want one. Please engage with us, at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au or anywhere else. This issue will only be resolved with discussion. Thanks Tony.
fortera_au (2024-02-20 05:03:12+00:00): There is lifecycle prefixes that can be used to show something has been removed, but keeps it in the database so that other mappers don't re-map it based on aerial imagery. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

I'd suggest demolished, removed, or razed.
tonyf1 (2024-02-20 05:14:10+00:00): Yes, lifecycle prefixes are my preferred solution at the moment and I am maintaining some tracks, as in physically, in a state of demolished, removed, or razed. The organization doing the demolishing still has to monitor the ex track's condition and keep it in a state that is a fair match for the tagging. Also, this solution only works if the data users continue to respect the prefix and not render the track.
tastrax (2024-02-20 05:24:07+00:00): Perhaps PWS can add Mapillary images showing the track closure signs, active rehabilitation and other measures that have been put in place to rehabilitate this trail.
mrpulley (2024-02-20 11:35:10+00:00): On the mailing list, I mentioned the sign at the start of the 'controversial' path - I'll copy the description I gave on the list here:
On the left side of the sign, there’s a warning icon (exclamation mark), then “No safety rail”, another warning icon (man falling off edge of crumbling cliff), then “Unstable edges”.
On the right side of the sign is the text “End of track, no safety rail beyond this point”.
The sign is there to discourage walkers venturing further south, but it’s not technically a “do not enter” sign.
If we were to use a lifestyle prefix tag, I was thinking of disused, rather then demolished or razed, as there was still a visible path (not actively removed - at least not in the first section that i rechecked).
mrpulley (2024-02-20 12:03:18+00:00): I've uploaded a photo of the sign at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:End_of_track_sign,_Apsley_Falls.JPG . I didn't take any photos of the path.
fortera_au (2024-02-21 02:50:07+00:00): Yeah I'd have to agree with disused, and access=discouraged really, if NPWS actively starts removing the track/puts up signs clearly indicating access being forbidden, then the respective tags should change. Until there's no signs of a track on Bing/ESRI and on the ground, the way itself should remain to clearly indicate the current state.
Anonix35 (2024-12-29 19:22:28+00:00): Hi. Are you sure that there are toilets in this parkplatz ?
Luzandro (2024-12-30 07:53:20+00:00): can't recall atm. At least on the Asfinag website it shows up with toilets, but it seems like that's the default and there aren't any rest areas listed that don't have toilets

https://www.asfinag.at/parken-rasten/rastanlagensuche/?facetFilter=%7B"type":%5B"pp"%5D%7D

it had a toilets=no years ago, which was set by some large area edits and subsequently reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44574220
Anonix35 (2024-12-30 08:05:59+00:00): Yes it's a default photo. And in the end, the site doesn't give too much information, which is a shame because it's rather easy to use.
It's okay, thanks anyway for your answer.
Luzandro (2024-12-30 08:18:47+00:00): forgot to mention, that they are the operator of the rest area
_youcancallmeolaf_ (2024-03-10 20:51:27+00:00): Der Straßenverlauf der Spargelfeldstraße bei der Baustelle zur Stadtstraße ist so nicht korrekt. Die Fahrbahn ist nur um wenige Meter verschoben, nicht um 50+ wie eingetragen.
Linie29 (2024-03-11 13:44:13+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Habs nun mit dem aktuellen Orthofoto korrigiert.
_youcancallmeolaf_ (2024-03-12 20:54:29+00:00): Danke :)
Filip009 (2024-02-16 21:25:05+00:00): Zdravím, tento chodník https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1249881838 mi nepríde ako reálny, prechádza cez prudké násypy, nevidieť tam žiadne vychodené chodníčky a podľa Stravy tadiaľ ľudia nechodia. Ste si ním istý?
luptakdavid (2024-02-18 10:26:20+00:00): Zdravím, súhlasím, čerpal som z oficiálnych stránok Barborskej cesty (https://barborskacesta.sk/), kde majú zverejnenú trasu na mapy.cz (https://en.mapy.cz/turisticka?dim=64ad5d2feddd54600ae9f893&x=19.0217248&y=48.6335994&z=10).

Písal som im ohľadom tejto časti, zatiaľ bez odpovede. Na základe reakcie potvrdím správnosť alebo upravím.

Ďakujem za kontrolu :)
luptakdavid (2024-02-18 19:45:26+00:00): Organizačný tím Barborskej cesty si tým je istý, citujem:

"Áno, táto trasa je súčasťou nového náučného chodníka Banskou dolinou, ktorý sme vyznačili v roku 2022.
Jeho cieľom bolo turistom sprístupniť lokality dolnej stupy, odkalísk a systému vodných žľabov - flúdrov.
Tiež sme ním chceli priviesť návštevníkov k prekopu zo Španej Doliny na Piesky, a odkloniť peších turistov z hlavnej cesty, 
ktorá je počas leta pomerne frekventovaná. Po ceste vedie trasa pre cyklistov."
Filip009 (2024-02-18 19:47:24+00:00): Okej, ale aspoň vidno, že im tam veľa ľudí so Stravou nechodí.
luptakdavid (2024-02-18 19:51:48+00:00): Pridal som poznámku https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4118726 ak by sa niekto na podujal na fyzické preskúmanie terénu. Možno časom pribudnú aj gpx záznamy zo Stravy apod.
Filip009 (2024-02-18 19:55:12+00:00): Dobrý nápad :)
gabro00 (2024-02-15 12:26:53+00:00): Szia! A Sándorfalvi útnál úgy gondolom a korábbi nyomvonal pontos volt, nincs ilyen törés benne itt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/940099276
És a hídnál sincs ilyesféle törés a kerékpárúton.

A 3D-s Google térképen ellenőrizhető.
itineris (2024-02-15 12:37:26+00:00): Szia!

Hú, itt csak véletlenül arrébb húzhattam valamit. Javítottam.

Ákos
gabro00 (2024-02-16 08:21:30+00:00): Köszi!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 08:12:50+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/912899354/history has tracktype = 4 that was added in this edit
Maybe it was supposed to be tracktype=grade4 ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Atracktype
fra0000 (2025-12-18 12:52:03+00:00): 
Hi, yes thanks I changed the tag
:)
Jan Olieslagers (2024-02-14 09:10:35+00:00): What has been mapped is only the runway, not the complete aerodrome.
Also - and more important - I understand there is a moratorium on the mapping of aerodromes in Ukraine, since there is no consensus about how to handle them. Some people wish to avoid publishing potentially strategic information. Not that I believe in that myself.
literan (2024-02-21 17:31:13+00:00): неверный формат адреса. Название улицы следует писать целиком
tux67 (2024-02-13 12:59:50+00:00): OSM Note 4110027
Sander H (2024-02-20 10:59:15+00:00): Hoi Egbert, weet je zeker dat alle panden gesloopt zijn. De gemeente heeft de zuidelijke panden uit de BAG gehaald, maar ze zien de panden aan de noordkant nog staan op de luchtfoto van januari.
Heb je foto's oid zodat de gemeente ze alsnog kan opschonen? Dit ter voorkoming dat we ze per ongeluk weer importeren.
Op de laatste foto's (nov-jan) van satellietdataportaal zie ik alles nog staan.
gr. Sander
eggie (2024-02-20 11:10:22+00:00): Hoi Sander.. Sat dataportaal is niet meer actueel.
Toen ik over de Zwijndrechtse Brug fietste zag ik een groot kaal terrein... maar moest wel mn handen goed aan het stuur houden. 
De BAG daarna gecheckt en die liep achter.

Er gaat nog veel meer weg daar.
Inmiddels heb ik een terugmelding gedaan en die heeft de BAG bevestigd.
Inmiddels kun je in de BAG viewer zien dat ze er mee bezig zijn. Zie van die schaduwplekken onder de voormalige loodsen. Het wordt allemaal bouwterrein.
Maar ik zal nog eens goed kijken hoe het met de noordelijke gebouwen gesteld staat. Als ik te veel heb weggehaald geef ik wel een seintje.
Groet..
Egbert
eggie (2024-02-20 11:21:39+00:00): Hoi Sander,

Die noordelijke cluster heb ik weer even teruggezet. De rest is inderdaad weg. Dat weet ik zeker.
'k Zie dat de BAG nu verder is bijgewerkt. Was iets te snel met slopen...  Het gaat overigens wel allemaal weg. 
Bedankt voor je bericht. 
Ga nog wel kijken. 
Groet,
Egbert
Sander H (2024-02-20 12:06:35+00:00): Had je melding gezien (nam al aan dat ie van jou was) en zag dat de gemeente maar de helft had verwijderd, dus had zelf de andere helft nog eens aangemeld (vol vertrouwen in je waarneming). Ach ja, kan gebeuren.
Zag in de media al dat de bewoners dolenthousiast waren dat ze weg moeten daar ;(
eggie (2024-02-20 12:09:10+00:00): Yep.. dat is een hele strijd aan het worden.
Maar zo klopt het weer voorlopig.
GUFSZ (2024-02-14 06:57:38+00:00): Ja, weiß der Geier, wie ich das hinbekommen habe.
Filip009 (2024-02-16 21:48:46+00:00): Adresa sa zapisuje trocha dosť inak https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:address. Pokiaľ je ale adresa na budove nie je nutné ju dávať aj do adresných tagov. Väčšina máp si adresu odvodí z budovy na ktorej sa bod nachádza.
JLZIMMERMANN (2024-02-15 23:16:55+00:00): Les fossés n'ont pas de nécessité à se connecter avec la voirie car ils sont en sous-sol.
spiregrain (2024-02-13 17:04:36+00:00): This could probably be encoded with one of those conditional access things.  Something like foot:conditional=yes @ (08:00-20:00) ; foot=private ; motor_vehicle=no  .
spiregrain (2024-02-13 17:04:56+00:00): if only the morning opening time was known
spiregrain (2024-02-13 17:12:35+00:00): Oh - my mistake - the gate itself has already got this tagging.   I've foudn the planning permission for the gate - which says 'dusk to dawn' and notes that the gate is temporary until the site on the south side of Zinc Street is complete.   I'll add to the note.
Joseph R P (2024-02-14 18:06:48+00:00): Hello, could you please explain why this entire area was changed to a golf course?
Joseph R P (2024-02-14 18:15:28+00:00): I have just now reverted the edits made around Mason Neck. Please do not delete existing features to improve golf courses.
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-14 10:09:28+00:00): Just a test?
Simone Bocca (2024-02-14 10:23:05+00:00): yep sorry no change should be included.
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-14 10:26:11+00:00): Thanks for your response!

Can you undo your changes?
Simone Bocca (2024-02-14 10:47:08+00:00): I cancelled the wrong label i added previously
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-14 10:49:34+00:00): ok, but sadly you did not add the previous tags, see version 2 of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147517810/history
Simone Bocca (2024-02-14 10:56:47+00:00): previous label restored now. 
It should be like it was in v2 now.
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-14 10:59:40+00:00): Thanks!

#HappyMapping
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-13 14:00:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11618669042
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10973595277
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10973595276
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1249909701
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1249909702
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361056597

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
CRCulver (2024-02-18 15:51:54+00:00): Please don’t tag service ways going through petrol stations as layer=-1, tunnel=yes, as you did to the Orlen at 52.8455066, 19.6704390. It is inaccurate, this road is not a tunnel. Moreover, the standard around the world now is that the roof way at the petrol station gets layer=1, so the service road is layer=0.
mueschel (2024-02-20 13:57:12+00:00): Hi,
you used the new tag "roof:face" here. What does it mean? A roof:shape=gabled always has two faces.
NADARAJ SARANYA (2024-02-20 14:47:05+00:00): Hi,
I learned osm tagging guide. That mention roof:face. Sometime roof face count it 3. So i add the tag.
Regards,
N.Saranya
mueschel (2024-02-20 15:21:20+00:00): A roof with 3 sides can't be "gabled" It's likely "side_hipped", see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape

Where exactly did you read about "roof:face"? This tag doesn't exist anywhere in OSM.
NADARAJ SARANYA (2024-02-21 01:30:17+00:00): Hi Muedchel,
Thank you for update comments. I will change future digitize.
Regards,
N.Saranya.
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-14 10:11:19+00:00): Just a test?
Jan_Kamen (2024-02-14 10:52:02+00:00): this point is just the first one.
there are 99 more
Rom1 (2024-02-22 07:40:41+00:00): Salut Corentin, tu as pensé à mettre dorénavant tes photos sur Panoramax https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr plutôt que Mapillary ? A+
Corentin54380 (2024-02-22 09:54:21+00:00): Saut Romain,
J y pense mais n ayant pas encore trouvé d appli sur smartphone, permettant de le faire rapidement/simplement (aussi pratique que mapillary, mais si tu es au courant kk chose je suis preneur).
Donc a défaut les mets encore sur mapillary... 
Je serais présent mercredi (j imagine que tu seras a distance, vu que ce sont les vacances 😅). 
A bientôt
Rom1 (2024-02-22 16:23:55+00:00): Pas d'appli encore pour Panoramax.
Pour mercredi, je ne serai pas présent effectivement. Je ne sais pas encore pour la visio. A+
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-13 14:30:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1249921810

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
meongseolin (2024-02-20 14:15:14+00:00): 请问一下，嵊泗公交确定搞完了么？
Herman Lee (2025-03-13 18:09:26+00:00): 差不多了
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-13 14:36:54+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 140144976, 146819946, 146821753, 146821941, 146822823, 146834117, 146835122, 146851694, 146853249, 146854369, 146857203, 146858144, 146863406, 146864668, 146893393, 146901403, 147041768, 147134221, 147134954, 147134999, 147136544, 147174534, 147175523, 147176170, 147254961, 147255698, 147256696, 147257418, 147257713, 147271775, 147324019, 147351828, 147352660, 147356899, 147357760, 147357903, 147399385, 147407302, 147408251.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-13 14:40:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1249925646

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
davenport651 (2024-02-13 17:58:44+00:00): Plats for this area can be found by searching "Wind Trace" at this URL: https://aca-prod.accela.com/LARA/Cap/CapHome.aspx?module=OLSR&TabName=OLSR&TabList=Home%7C0%7CLicenses%7C1%7CBuilding%7C2%7CPlanReview%7C3%7CFireServices%7C4%7COLSR%7C5%7CDevices%7C6%7CServiceRequest%7C7%7CCurrentTabIndex%7C5

Click an entry, then click "Record Info" and "Attachments" to download the PDF.
wambacher (2024-02-14 22:35:50+00:00): Hier ist nicht Köln sodnern Kerpen.
addr:city und addr:postcode waren falsch.
siehe https://postcode.wambachers-osm.website/?map=17/50.871235/6.748004&base=OSM&data=PCBDE,PCDE,WPCDE,PCAL8
Syl (2024-02-13 16:23:30+00:00): Bonjour, aucune des modifications faites ici n'a l'air correcte, pouvez-vous corriger ?
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2024-02-13 16:26:20+00:00): Bonjour,

C'est un changement de nom de notre client. La suite des informations interviendra dans quelques semaines

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
Syl (2024-02-13 18:26:59+00:00): Bonjour, d'accord la modification du nom est correcte, désolé pour ce point.

Mais pour le reste avez-vous pris le temps de regarder avant de me répondre ?

Le nom de la rue que vous avez-mis ne correspond pas au nom qui est dans OSM et sur le terrain. Le lien vers le site web a de nouveau un traceur à la fin. Et vous avez mis que c'est une entreprise de BTP, l'activité a aussi changée en plus du nom ?
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2024-02-14 07:57:49+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour votre alerte
Nous avons corrigé effectivement les données. 

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
Syl (2024-02-14 08:17:40+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour ces corrections mais il y a toujours un problème avec  le nom de la rue.

Ne pouvez-vous pas simplement copier le nom tel qu'il est dans OSM ?
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2024-02-14 08:21:07+00:00): Désolé pour l'erreur de frappe, nous avons fait la correction

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
Syl (2024-02-14 08:29:55+00:00): Ce n'est toujours pas bon...
Le "et" ne doit pas avoir de majuscule.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2024-02-14 08:33:16+00:00): C'est corrigé

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
KevinOs (2024-02-13 22:03:56+00:00): Hey there bud, some tips to help on mapping out maxspeed and sidewalks as i have been going ham on it lately. Check out the SLIM maps https://maps.edmonton.ca/map.aspx for the max speeds and special school/playground zones. split ways to help tag the sections with conditional speeds and add this tag and key "maxspeed:conditional	30 @ 07:30-21:00"

here is an example to help https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106605128

sidewalks are a bit of a beast to map onto the roadways so i have been just drawing them out now, but 100% get no one wants to go through that effort.

hope that helps!
JMGonk (2024-02-15 13:17:13+00:00): Instead of 'way too complicated' I should have said 'way more work than I have energy for right now'.  Good on you for taking it on though.  SLIM is a gold mine of information that I have gone to for years.  The County of Wetaskiwin has a different system with similar information.  One of these days we will convince our various levels of government to all use one open standard.
KevinOs (2024-02-15 20:23:01+00:00): Understandable, would be nice to have more automation tools to help get things done quickly as someone is out and about or has a few minutes to kill.  And agreed it's wild how every city and county has it's own implementation of some gis thing. Take care!
pitfire (2024-02-15 05:40:14+00:00): Hallo ayxis,
(...Bei Fragen/Anmerkungen/Kritik etc. bitte nicht zögern.)
Danke für Deine Adressänderungen!
Wir bevorzugen die Vervollständigung der Adresseinträge nach den Erfassungsregeln:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr:*#Was_wird_hinzugef%C3%BCgt
Das erspart eine erneute Nachbearbeiteung und verbessert massiv die Datenqualität :-)
Danke & Gruß pitfire
ayxis (2024-02-15 07:11:17+00:00): Hi pitfire,
danke für den Hinweis. Ich weiß, dass da eigentlich noch die PLZ, Stadt und Land dazugehört. Ich habe in der Vergangenheit bereits versehentlich in zwei Changesets falsche Werte eingetragen ohne es selbst zu merken. Deswegen lasse ich das mittlerweile sein, wenn das nicht sowieso schon an den Elementen gepflegt, ist die ich auftrenne. Gibt es einen einfacheren Weg um herauszufinden welche PLZ und welche Stadt richtig ist? Ein JOSM Plug-In oder so?
Ich kenne nur https://www.postdirekt.de/plzserver/index.html und die Suche ist, wie ich finde, etwas umständlich zu bedienen wenn man viele Hausnummern in verschiedenen Gebieten umpflegen möchte. 

Danke dass du hier überall die fehlenden Attribute gepflegt hast.

Viele Grüße
ayxis
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-13 15:00:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9901881989
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11618809997

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2024-03-19 15:45:47+00:00): Hello maxlax, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments \n
Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-15 22:29:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152740214, 152740288, 152740274, 152740234, 152740192, 152740169, 152740167, 152740249, 152740178 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions by Hamilton 44/Delta Evas ALL, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16207
Nielkrokodil (2024-02-14 16:18:45+00:00): Hallo Johannes,

bei diesem Changeset gingen einige Busrelationen in Deutschlandsberg kaputt. Das ist glaube ich durch einen Fehler im iD Editor getriggert worden. Es sind die Weg-Elemente in Relationen durcheinandergebracht worden. 

Bist du geübt im Busrelationen mappen? Dann würde ich dich bitten, dass du es korrigierst.  

Betroffene Relationen:
Linie 741 (alle drei Relationen)
Relation 15050111

Prüfen ob es passt geht hier (es muss grün sein)
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=15.23016&lat=46.81608&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes

Liebe Grüße
Nielkrokodil
Nielkrokodil (2024-02-14 16:19:31+00:00): Relation 16868329 ist auch betroffen
jogemu (2024-02-14 22:03:33+00:00): Hallo Nielkrokodil,

danke für den Hinweis. Ich wusste gar nicht, dass das mit iD passieren kann. Der Verlauf der fünf Busrelationen sollte mit osm.org/changeset/147467376 und osm.org/changeset/147467888 wieder passen.

Geübt bin ich nicht wirklich, aber halbwegs vertraut. Ich frage mich, wie das in Zukunft verhindert werden kann.

Liebe Grüße
Johannes
Nielkrokodil (2024-02-14 22:28:24+00:00): Das iD-Problem wurde im Jänner im Community-Forum diskutiert, so hab ich das mitbekommen:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/id-editor-mucking-up-bus-routes/108105
Nielkrokodil (2024-02-15 06:39:20+00:00): Im OSM Inpector ist jetzt wieder alles grün. Danke fürs richten!
Und hoffen wir, dass der iD Editor bald repariert wird. 
LG
jogemu (2024-02-15 11:13:27+00:00): Danke für den Forum-Link. Es ist gut, dass ich von einer täglichen Aktualiserung des OSM Inspectors ausgegangen bin. 12 Stunden sind zwar kürzer aber trotzdem eine lange Zeit zu warten.
LG
AlvaroRC (2025-06-03 18:17:21+00:00): The trees and the streetlights are not properly aligned. View aerial imagery to check alignment.
gscholz (2024-02-14 07:28:02+00:00): Hi Heinz_V,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=77.95824&lat=24.95135&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147414727

Especially way 1249946763 is affected here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1249946763

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Константин Гам (2025-09-25 09:41:12+00:00): 100500-ый раз умоляю вас не вносите "Информацию о новостройке" не побывав на месте, я очередной раз приехал на авто на пешеходную дорожку, потому что внесённые вами service являются пешими дорожками... про не соответствие геометрий, даже говорить не буду.
УТОМИЛО!