piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Peter Maiwald (2025-10-08 22:59:49+00:00): In der Gewässerdatenbank des Landesanglerverbandes Brandenburg wird dieses Gewässer geführt als Kiessee bei Leegebruch mit der Gewässernummer: P 14-117.
Siehe hier: https://www.lavb.de/gwsmaps/
oder hier: https://www.alleangeln.de/gewaesser/kiessee-leegebruch
oder hier: https://www.fisch-hitparade.de/gewaesser/kiessee-leegebruch/
AntMadeira (2023-09-19 12:33:11+00:00): Olá, Bruno.
Bem-vindo ao OpenStreetMap.
Obrigado por corrigires o nome desta rua. O seu nome foi retirado do sítio da Câmara de Pedrógão Grande, mas se é esse nome que está na placa, é esse nome que conta.
Qualquer dúvida, é só dizeres.

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141459570
map per (2023-09-22 17:07:32+00:00): Hello ThymeLeaves,

and welcome to OpenStreetMaps!

Your edits look really suspicious. Can you please explain what you intended to do and what "pictograms" you are you trying to avoid.
And what sources did you use? Did you visit the place?

Thanks and best regards
map per
ThymeLeaves (2023-09-22 18:11:51+00:00): Hi map per,

thanks for your comment! The whole area belongs to the mosque, and some buildings serve a secondary purpose (kitchen, library). But when the identity of these buildings is set to e.g kitchen/library, pictograms show up on the map. I wanted to prevent that some unknowing person might think these are openly accessible and active buildings.
- ThymeLeaves
map per (2023-09-22 19:01:39+00:00): Ok, thanks, then that's korrekt as private places are not mapped on OSM
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-09-19 09:30:05+00:00): way351262732 <- node3700749896
way482860821 <- node5824761754
way982867984 <- node8540846917
way1000273199 <- node5782059512
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-09-19 09:32:35+00:00): 1. 这些区域并不是行政区划真实边界，真的行政区划边界请在关系里设为outer并加上boundary=administrative
2. 即使就是整个城区建成区画一个landuse=residential，也是不推荐的，因为城区绝对不是一个纯的居民区，它也有商场，也有学校，也有公园，所以也建议拆开用更精确更小的，一块一块的，街区级别的面要素
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-19 10:00:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219248336
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219249080
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219249111
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219257979

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
AloeArbue (2023-09-19 11:10:00+00:00): Можно правку удалить, в последующей правке я более точно отрисовал объезд вокруг посёлка
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-19 10:00:17+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219249596

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
BodhidharmaI (2023-10-10 21:17:19+00:00): Hi,

When you are fundamentally changing the names like you did with the maritime borders here, for example, then it’s not just “additinal information”. You probably shouldn’t be making such controversial changes.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-09-22 16:01:45+00:00): voce deletou varios contornos de casas pra agrupa-los dentro de uma forma só, incorreto.
flohoff (2023-09-28 09:41:21+00:00): Moin
du hast hier eine Weide eingetragen:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1209030974

meadow ist ja weideland also würde ich da erwarten das da zumindest zeitweise Weidetiere wie Pferde oder Kühe stehen.

Im Luftbild sieht das auch sehr nach dem Garten der Hausnummer 10 an.

Mir ist das aufgefallen weil das landuse dazu nicht aus dem landuse residential mit einem multipolygon ausgenommen ist. D.h. hier liegen landuses übereinander.

Flo
flohoff (2023-09-28 09:43:13+00:00): 
Diese beiden village_greens überlappen auch mit dem residential und müssten in ein multipolygon.

Ich würde das auch nicht als village_green taggen. Für mich ist village_green eher eine öffentliche Grünanlage - das hier ist ja nicht öffentlich sondern der Garten der Häuser drumherum.

Meinswegen auch village green aber dann muss ein multipolygon her.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1209030972
flohoff (2023-09-28 09:43:59+00:00): 
Hier kann man übrigens die ganzen Overlaps sehen:

https://osm.zz.de/dbview/?db=landuseoverlap-owl&layer=overlap#51.90303,8.37261,15z
nortvest (2023-10-19 17:31:00+00:00): Habe die fehlerhaften Flächen wieder entfernt. Bin noch nicht lange dabei... 

Gruß 
nortvest
eggie (2023-09-19 18:53:59+00:00): Dag Wesley..  Volgens mij gaat het nog steeds goed.
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2023-09-19 18:58:05+00:00): Wel veel verschil tussen mei en september met die waterstanden.
Dat stukje met die halve cirkel. 
Wellicht ook intermittent=yes en dan water uitbreiden? 
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=19-09-2022&loc=51.89300%2C5.636673%2C17z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-09-11&acqid=20230911_105430_SVNEO-01&sensor=SuperView-NEO
Wesley_Link (2023-09-19 18:58:29+00:00): Bedankt voor je feedback Eggie
Doe me best👍🏻
Wesley_Link (2023-09-19 20:46:54+00:00): Ja schij uit hou op als er water van uit Duitsland ons kant op komt dan staat de uiterwaarden vol met water. Ik zal eens kijk of dat me gaat lukken.
Wesley_Link (2023-09-19 21:01:07+00:00): Nog één vraagje hoe kon ik die satelliet foto's update?
eggie (2023-09-19 21:10:02+00:00): Gewoon geduld.. Die satellieten draaien een eigen rondjes. 
Links in de 'liniaal' zie je bovenin meestal de voorlaatste week.
Mijn ervaring is dat je een streek of adres moet zoeken en dan heb je de laatste foto.
Zodra je gaat experimenteren ben je soms de instelling weer kwijt. Ik sluit dus af en open het portaal steeds opnieuw. Beetje trial and error.
Wesley_Link (2023-09-19 21:17:19+00:00): Oké op die fiets dankjewel
sp!rt (2023-09-21 17:40:36+00:00): Некорректное использование пары leisure=garden
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure%3Dgarden
gurglypipe (2023-09-19 11:22:14+00:00): Hi, are you sure all those fences are actually walls? If so, someone’s been on a major wall building spree in Carnforth since I last visited. Have you surveyed this in person? Thanks
John Embrey (2023-09-19 12:36:01+00:00): I needed to try something. I will put them back to fences tomorrow.
gurglypipe (2023-09-19 12:41:08+00:00): What were you trying?
Rodrigo Rega (2024-12-07 18:12:41+00:00): Reverted because fictional mapping.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160035651
Rodrigo Rega (2024-12-07 18:05:58+00:00): Reverted because fictional mapping.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160035484
Rodrigo Rega (2024-12-07 18:18:01+00:00): Reverted because fictional mapping.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160035761
TBKMrt (2023-09-19 11:08:38+00:00): Siehe Kommentar 3896960 bezüglich der Einbahnregelung der Ketzergasse.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3896960
TBKMrt (2023-11-18 06:15:44+00:00): Straße ist wieder in beide Richtungen befahrbar.

Siehe Änderungssatz 144162935:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144162935
jqngarcia (2023-09-20 14:22:10+00:00): Buenas Tardes, Ismael, he tenido que corregir tus ediciones, ya que las paradas de autobus ya existian, quizá tendrias que actualizar tu mapa en maps.me.

Salud y Mapas, JQN
Metzor (2023-09-19 11:33:09+00:00): Hi Laachir Deeper,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) 

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Metzor (2023-09-19 11:35:26+00:00): Maybe changing the following node was by accident?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11098420707#map=19/29.31097/-9.21623
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2024-01-10 23:24:55+00:00): I have changed it back to a caravan_site because motorhome parking is not camping and this is a motorhome stopover, se note #3893084
Hufkratzer (2023-09-19 21:49:24+00:00): Hi,
das, was du da als Reitanlagen (leisure=horse_riding) umgetaggt hast, sind keine. Bitte lies mal die Seiten:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
und
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building=riding_hall
Das, was vorher mit building=barn (Scheune) getaggt war, hättest du besser als building=riding_hall getaggt. Wenn kein building-Tag dran ist, wird es auch nicht mehr als Gebäude auf der Karte dargestellt -> unpraktisch.
Das runde Ding, was vorher mit man_made=silo getaggt war, könnte ein überdachter Roundpen oder eine Führanlage sein, das kann ich nicht erkennen. Roundpens werden normalerweise wie Reitplätze (leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian) getaggt. Wegen Führanlagen siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:animal=horse_walker
Und hier noch ein Gesamtbeispiel:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107024222
user_5359 (2023-09-21 18:10:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/7222063614/history. Please check my correction, see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dtower
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 19:17:56+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11202192365/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit
What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then?
Cardiff_Electric (2025-12-19 21:57:29+00:00): Cześć,
Szczerze to już nie pamiętam. :D Chyba chodzi o antenę i brak detali na jej temat. Konstrukcja, przeznaczenie, etc.
Trzaskam setki małych poprawek i mi rzeczy umykają.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-20 02:21:25+00:00): To zdejmę to fixme=yes jako niejasne
Frans S (2023-09-24 09:25:57+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy, Just mapped a rough outline. Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
* When buildings have an L, U shape or protruding elements, they should be included into your mappings.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141464859
Frans S (2023-09-24 09:26:54+00:00): * Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No further text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
I have to remove your mappings. The buildings need to be mapped individually.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141464859
Frans S (2023-09-24 10:00:20+00:00): Rectification on my previous message.
I was wrong with my message about  mapping of multiple buildings. I thought you mapped a group of buildings as 1 building, however you tagged them as a residential area which is correct.
Sorry and keep mapping
Syl (2023-10-16 08:59:49+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai enlevé le tag building, ce n'est pas un bâtiment.
Moldovan_Merkator (2024-03-08 20:33:42+00:00): Mai ștergi încă o dată denumirile poligoanelor atunci am să raportez la moderatori.
Metzor (2023-09-19 17:07:04+00:00): Hi brechetp,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) 

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
brechetp (2023-09-20 13:38:54+00:00): Hi Metzor,

Thank you very much for your feedback. 

I didn't realize the charges I uploaded were spanning so different locations, won't happen again!

I also didn't know about this notion of change set, thanks for the link (should probably have checked before wildly uploading).

Should I undo the changeset to do it better?

Cheers
Metzor (2023-09-20 13:58:12+00:00): Hi brechetp,

That's what I cherish about OSM: You can just start to change the map without a huge knowledge about OSM and learn more and more on the fly.

Leave the changeset as it is,no worries :-)
brechetp (2023-09-20 15:10:02+00:00): That's right :) awesome thanks for your help !
marczoutendijk (2023-12-11 19:47:01+00:00): De DWG heeft de wijzigingen in deze changeset deels gewijzigd en deels teruggedraaid omdat ze niet op de werkelijkheid waren gebaseerd.
De Golfclub heeft aangegeven dat een aantal paden NIET toegankelijk zijn voor publiek.

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-02 11:15:43+00:00): Reverted by DWG as moved incorrectly

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163117005
Toddletoon (2023-09-29 09:26:19+00:00): Western Line railway still active, cycling pathway adjacent to railway.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141902992
Toddletoon (2023-09-29 09:26:20+00:00): Western Line railway still active, cycling pathway adjacent to railway.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141902992
Frans S (2023-09-20 09:30:25+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
The default tag for buildings is building=yes. Don't change them please.
High multi floor buildings need to be drawn over their rooflines and placed on their footprint.
Best regards and keep mapping
eggie (2023-09-19 13:01:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Tjuro (2023-09-20 16:10:48+00:00): Hello flierfy,

Thanks for mapping in the Netherlands,
Here it is consensus to not use multipolygons when they are not necessary, like using multiple unclosed outers or using an multipolygon with only one member.
I have fixed it for you.

Greetings Tjuro
ManuelB701 (2023-09-19 12:53:31+00:00): Die Linie 57 war vorhin die einzige Linie in Mainz, die public_transport:version=2 hatte, sie wurde somit auf moderne Standards gebracht.
Was noch bei der Linie fehlt ist die Variante nur bis zum Südring sowie bis zur Peter-Sander-Straße aber wichtig war für mich die Hauptroute zu verbessern.
jlambo (2023-09-19 23:03:33+00:00): Hey there! In the future, please don't delete streets and turn them into turning_loop nodes. Turning them into a single point is removing detail. Reference: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_loop 
Thanks!
imamapperguy (2023-09-19 23:07:36+00:00): So both work and accepted yet you needed to comment and change back. Got it.
jlambo (2023-09-20 01:40:33+00:00): "If a turning loop has been mapped as a way, do not remap it as a simple node, as that would remove detail from the map. " Just trying to make the map better, so please don't do this in the future.
imamapperguy (2023-09-20 01:44:14+00:00): I'd argue that the turning loop and turning loop Island are better for the map than "detail" of a drawn loop. The node type wouldnt exist if it wasn't meant to be used. I will continue to to use turning loop/turning loop Island in the future.
MapFox09 (2023-09-21 14:43:53+00:00): The node should only be used if exact mapping cannot be done for whatever reason (outdated/low quality imagery; covered by something; lacking time to map it properly). Please do not remove the more detailed mapped loop for a node.
imamapperguy (2023-09-21 15:46:37+00:00): Not adding anything new to the conversation there but thanks?
pitscheplatsch (2023-10-15 11:46:40+00:00): reverted
infeeeee (2023-09-19 16:32:26+00:00): Szia!

Mi a pontos korlátozás az utcán? Mert ha csak sima "Behajtani tilos kivéve célforgalom" akkor a motor_vehicle=yes az nem jó, mert az átenged minden gépjárművet. Tény, hogy az eredeti címke is rossz volt, sejtem mit akartál csinálni.

Kivéve célforgalom jelölése helyesen: vehicle=destination. És ha bicikli is bemehet akkor annak kell egyedül extra címke: bicycle=yes

Van egyéb kivétel a célforgalom mellett?
edori912 (2023-09-20 11:45:55+00:00): Szia!

Köszi a visszajelzést. A fő célom az volt, hogy a BudapestGO tervezzen gyalogosan a Márton utcának ezzel a részével, ha a gyalogos a Gát utca irányából menne a Haller utca/Mester utca megállóba.
infeeeee (2023-09-20 11:51:47+00:00): Ok, de mi szerepel a táblán? Ha arra jársz le tudod fotózni mindkét végén? Jobb lenne pontosan jelölni, nem egyesével felvenni kivételeket.
edori912 (2023-09-20 11:55:31+00:00): A Mester utca felőli végén a "Behajtani tilos kivéve célforgalom" , a Gát utca felől pedig "Behajtani tilos" tábla van.
infeeeee (2023-09-20 12:50:08+00:00): Javítottam itt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141512242

A "behajtani tilos kivéve célforgalom" a kresz szerint vonatkozik a biciklikre is, ha nincs mellette más kivétel. 

Gyalog már jól fog tervezni az útvonaltervező.
Veiviseren (2024-06-24 07:28:15+00:00): Hi
In February there was about 5 km left with concrete work. I rode it a few days ago to confirm that the remaning 32km was indeed concrete surface.
pitscheplatsch (2023-10-15 11:46:30+00:00): reverted
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:02:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
rhtb0 (2023-09-20 07:16:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8118498114
여기 출구는 인주~아산 구간과 같이 2027년 이후로 개통합니다
Rodrigo Rega (2024-12-07 18:10:26+00:00): Reverted because fictional mapping.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160035584
FroschForscher (2025-10-13 19:38:21+00:00): Hello k127, can you help at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5000322
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-09-20 18:04:23+00:00): Hi, since you've edited many pharmacies, maybe you know what to do in a similar situation here https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3692292
dgmapping (2023-09-20 19:01:41+00:00): Note sure what kind of issue Apirnus wants to resolve.

Mustika Keskuse Apteek is already mapped in OSM:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7755823506/history

Opening hours from the photo (https://westnordost.de/p/149089.jpg) along with name and operator where correct from version 1 with Rocketdata import.
dgmapping (2023-09-20 19:02:01+00:00): Not*
gszkr (2024-10-17 12:34:06+00:00): Skąd alejka na parkingu private? Przecież on jest dostępny dla każdego. Usuwam to ograniczenie.
gszkr (2024-10-17 12:34:41+00:00): Konkretnie ta alejka: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1209077113
Metzor (2023-09-19 17:09:33+00:00): Hi Richieundlisa,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) 

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Olaf der Mapper (2023-09-19 22:26:08+00:00): Ich glaube, dat is wieder so'n Trollaccount. Bei 49.82171,8.90177 gibt es vmtl. kein Straßencafé

LG, Olaf
Metzor (2023-09-20 03:58:10+00:00): Stimmt. Etwas ungewöhnliche Gebäudeform. Kannst du revertieren?
LG Metzor
Olaf der Mapper (2023-09-20 12:14:36+00:00): Leider nein. Bin noch relativ neu hier und hab die Revert-Funktion hier drin in iD noch nicht entdeckt.

LG Olaf
richieundlisa (2023-09-20 18:35:41+00:00): Hallo Olaf, das soll auch kein Straßencafe sein, sondern eine in das Erdreich eingelassenes Gestell welches der Wanderer herausziehen kann und sich bei den Getränken bedienen kann. Dabei ist eine Büchse montiert um das Geld einzuwerfen.
LG vom Trollaccount :-)
Olaf der Mapper (2023-09-20 19:19:28+00:00): Hallo richieundlisa, 
sorry für die unfaire Vorverturteilung - ich habe am selben Abend eine Stelle auf der Karte entdeckt, da hat jemand auf einen Acker bei Heidelberg eine Tankstelle, einen Funpark, einen Tchibo, 5 Bushaltestellen und ein kurzes Stück Bundesstraße draufgemappt: Offensichtlicher Unfug. Habe das deshalb auch bei dem bizarr geformten Cafégebäude hier im Gebüsch angenommen. Nochmal sorry für das vorschnelle Urteil und viel Spaß beim Mappen weiterhin! Aber bitte nicht mehr so große Changesets über halb Europa legen ;)

LG Olaf
mueschel (2023-09-20 08:29:49+00:00): Hi,
please check the parking tags you added, e.g. "parking:side:fee:conditional". There's shouldn't be "side" in the key, it has to be replaced by left/right/both.
vincenttux (2023-09-21 04:38:07+00:00): Hi,
I've replaced the keys.
thank you.
pitscheplatsch (2023-10-15 11:46:14+00:00): reverted
Dodko (2023-09-20 09:14:26+00:00): Cesty netreba spájať s katastrálnimy hranicami obce, tie si cez filter skryť.
Aj ten dlhý mosť bol divný, vrátil som to späť.
habi (2025-04-23 12:12:54+00:00): Hey Andy
Hier hast du dem Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96423022 `name=Grenzweg` verpasst.
Das ist ziemlich sicher ziemlich falsch, die Adresse des Gebäudes ist nach dem Gebäude- und Wohnungsregister [1] korrekt erfasst.

Ich habe den Namen am Gebäue entfernt.

Gruss,
Habi

[1]: https://qa.poole.ch/addresses/ch/
gurglypipe (2023-09-19 15:41:09+00:00): Heya, are you aware of the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels layer for calibrating imagery offsets? If you’re going to make alignment adjustments, please make sure to calibrate the background imagery alignment first using it.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Property_extents_in_the_United_Kingdom

It provides a single source of truth for imagery alignment across the UK, which is good because the Bing imagery changes alignment by a few metres every time it’s refreshed, and its alignment varies across the UK.

The Bing alignment for Gosforth looks to be about -1.46,-1.82 at the moment.

Happy mapping :)
pantufla (2023-10-10 08:25:36+00:00): Esta ya estaba. Borro por duplicado.
SK53 (2023-11-11 18:27:55+00:00): Are there really two high crosses here? Don't remember seeing two.
b-unicycling (2023-11-11 20:10:04+00:00): According to the Sites and monuments records and Wikipedia, there are two. The Western one is not complete, though.
Dawid2849 (2023-09-20 22:19:57+00:00): Budowa już ruszyła
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-21 16:57:54+00:00): to w takim razie, jeśli plac budowy jest taki sam jak to landuse=proposed (a wątpię) to można tą edycję wycofać i przetagować obszar
Dawid2849 (2023-09-21 18:09:33+00:00): No tu powinien być landuse=construction od jakiegoś tygodnia lub dwóch, zmienię w piątek lub sobotę. No chyba, że możesz i chce Ci się to zrobić szybciej.