piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 00:58:02+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165050348
vmicho (2025-10-18 17:31:14+00:00): Hi. Please pay more attention next time: you destroyed the destiantions, the geometry is shit (bad exit angles for navigation), and you put the oneways in wrong direction :/
vmicho (2025-10-18 17:47:39+00:00): note: i've fixed them all
Pan (2025-10-19 04:15:20+00:00): Thanks for fixing my mistake. I wouldn't say that the geometry was "shit", though.
vmicho (2025-10-20 05:54:10+00:00): Hi, no problem. Well the problem is when you draw lines exactly as on aerial view, some turns will disappear (will look less sharp than in reality) or appear (even in other direction, like on roundabouts). This then make problems on navigation. regards
user_5359 (2025-02-21 12:23:13+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/12586559082 (One of many objects). What ist the mean of the tag LSNLabel = 14 HONEYSUCKLE DR AMELIA.
j0hn33y (2025-02-21 14:19:29+00:00): It’s a string that can have addr:unit information, typically trailer parks would contain many addr:unit (But this one only had one 43A). Normally I would remove tag when merging with building area, but with static_caravans I have been keeping address separate as they are somewhat transient. Tag has been removed.
NeisBot (2025-02-14 03:02:54+00:00): Hello SnappleApple, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/12586570041
https://osm.org/node/12586570040

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=162487463
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-16 13:49:23+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/162505862
SomeoneElse2 (2025-02-17 12:58:42+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
I think that this edit might have introduced a gap in the Saxon_Shore_Way relation 8864.  I've filled it in now:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8864#map=18/51.384666/0.523991
It might also be worth checking the other bus route relations - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359466727 is in fewer than the way to the south.
Best Regards,
Andy
NeisBot (2025-02-14 03:44:37+00:00): Hi Dan McNarry, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 12 natural(s)
- 1 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=162487980
Taya_S (2025-02-14 12:58:14+00:00): Hello Dan McNarry,

It seems that you are coming to OpenStreetMap to map for some sort of game, is this correct? And if so, would you mind telling me the name of the game?

Mapping in OpenStreetMap because you wish to play a game that uses our map is totally fine, but you are expected to follow the same mapping standards as everyone else.

There are some issues with the names you have given these farmlands, as it is unlikely for all these farmlands to have simple numbers as names. It is also very uncommon for mappers to delete the things they just added to the map.

You can read more about how to get started and good practices on our wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions

Happy mapping,
Taya Snijder on behalf of the Data Working Group
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-14 06:15:23+00:00): #seo spam
FajrAl (2025-02-16 16:59:44+00:00): Digitasi sebenarnya memerlukan 2 tipe data: primer dan sekunder. Primer berupa survei. Sekunder bisa dapatkan citra satelit. Umumnya yang digunakan di Editor ini adalah data sekunder, dan perlu waktu juga untuk citra tersebut diperbarui. Ada baiknya survei dan mengira di mana saja batas perumahan tersebut.
Monoplustudio (2025-02-17 06:51:32+00:00): saya penguni di perumahan tersebut, bila ingin melakukan survie dipersilahkan dan bila survei apa yang harus di lakukan? how?
adiatmad (2025-02-17 11:09:00+00:00): Setahu saya salah satunya bisa menggunakan aplikasi Mapillary (street view) di hape sambil keliling perumahan. Kalo sudah di-upload, nanti bisa edit sendiri atau minta bantuan sukarelawan lainnya.

@Monoplustudio : Jika berkenan, silakan bergabung di grup publik OpenStreetMap Indonesia buat diskusi (https://t.me/osmindonesia)
Taya_S (2025-02-14 08:21:33+00:00): Hello MSAeditest,

You just deleted this construction area completely. This implies there is now nothing there anymore. 

Normally after construction has been completed the `landuse=contruction` either gets retagged to represent its new function, or it gets replaced with a more detailed mapping of the now completed area.

Sincerely,
Taya Snijder
MSAeditest (2025-02-15 03:16:50+00:00): Apologies, I understand the satellite imagery can be misleading so I deleted the out of date tag. I will provide some further context on the building functions in another edit
CurlingMan13 (2025-03-04 00:51:13+00:00): Please put the unit numbers in the correct field:

addr:unit=*
rskedgell (2025-02-14 08:00:45+00:00): (Review requested)

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding your business to the map. You seem to have added yourselves twice, once to the building at the corner of Worplesdon Road and Sheepfold Road and as a separate node (point) on Worplesdon Road between Seymours and Miah's (probably no. 137). Is this correct?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-14 23:13:51+00:00): Please don't add fake names
cswilson252 (2026-03-22 00:26:36+00:00): Hi, historical railways can be added to OpenHistoricalMap! See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground for more info! :)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180230883
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-15 10:28:05+00:00): #seo #spam
cswilson252 (2026-03-23 02:14:09+00:00): Reverting as abandoned railways that are no longer visible on aerial imagery are better suited for OpenHistoricalMap (OHM).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180278416
PostaMap_Infinite (2025-02-14 06:59:26+00:00): Sorry, I mean’t golfcart=yes to golfcart=designated. Oops!
NewBGoose (2025-11-25 19:39:26+00:00): Are you sure this exists? For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359786450/history#map=17/43.429187/-80.431938

Does not appear on any satellite view I could find.
cswilson252 (2026-03-23 01:49:19+00:00): Reverting as abandoned railways that are no longer visible on aerial imagery are better suited for OpenHistoricalMap (OHM).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180278071
cswilson252 (2026-04-09 17:52:57+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contribution. I noticed that one of your sources is the "Canadian Electric Railway Map Collection". According to information I could find, this collection is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0, which is not compatible with OSM project licensing.
I was wondering if you have explicit permission from the copyright holder to use this as a source?
MichS (2025-02-14 08:22:28+00:00): Guten Tag,

warum bitte wurde eine Quelle und eine Sitzbank gelöscht?

MFG
DD1GJ (2025-02-14 08:28:44+00:00): Teilrevert. Pfad ist jetzt als privat gekennzeichnet und der Weg über die Wiese war bereitst zuvor auf unsichtbar gesetzt. Einzig das Entfernen der Privaten Sitzbänke war einigermaßen ok und akzeptabel.
DD1GJ (2025-02-14 08:28:56+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162490475
woodpeck (2025-02-14 08:30:55+00:00): Da haben wir uns überschnitten - s. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17233
Nakaner-repair (2025-02-22 15:49:07+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162821515 until resurvey
SHARCRASH (2025-02-16 15:48:45+00:00): Salut!
Merci pour la remise du pont www.openstreetmap.org/way/304512983 et la màj en singletrail de www.openstreetmap.org/way/539444505
Par contre pour  www.openstreetmap.org/way/1249484774 le pont à cet endroit à de nouveau été emporté. Hier, je ne pense pas que je sois passé à coté sans le voir car j'ai suivi un fléchage de rando.
rempshaener (2025-02-14 20:18:23+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.

Du hattest letztlich „einer Adresse einen Namen gegeben“.

Das hat ein anderer Mapper bereits gesehen und einen separaten Punkt angelegt.
Das wäre jetzt dieser hier: www.openstreetmap.org/node/12588072913
Erfasst ist dieser mit healthcare=counselling. Das oder ein vergleichbares Merkmal ist wichtig, damit OSM weiß, um was es sich bei dem Punkt handelt.
Unter healthcare=counselling fallen Beratungsstellen, „die eine gesundheitliche Beratung bieten. Darunter fallen z. B. Sucht-Beratungsstellen, Ernährungsberater oder Sexualtherapeuten.“ siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE%3ATag%3Ahealthcare%3Dcounselling
Wenn das der richtige Schwerpunkt ist, könntest du es so lassen.

Wenn eher ein sozialer Schwerpunkt zutreffend ist, könnte z. B.
amenity=social_facility
social_facility=outreach
social_facility:for=juvenile

passen. Das social_facility=outreach ist hier beschrieben: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:social_facility%3Doutreach

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
Glassman (2025-02-14 18:50:44+00:00): You changed a parking lot to a park and added a crossing node to the end of a service road that doesn't connect to anything. I'm going to revert this edit mainly because of changing the parking to a park. If you are curious, the parking lot is part of the Grass Lawn Park ready. If you disagree with my actions, please leave a changeset comment. I will send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162492465
Glassman (2025-02-14 18:41:36+00:00): The path should connect to a road to be used by routers. Can you connect this to the road?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162492540
Vinber-Pro (2025-02-26 10:45:32+00:00): salut,
j'ai l'impression qu'il y a un truc pas clair sur ce batiement : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/383104175

à discuter :)
Vinber-Pro (2025-03-02 08:54:20+00:00): Qu'est ce que cela veut dire Toby Soatsihadino

ne serait-ce pas donc building=yes et name=Toby Soatsihadino ?
s777n (2025-02-14 15:00:52+00:00): Здравствуйте. Ваша правка была удалена. Вы опять нарисовали несуществующие дороги поверх зданий. Луговая улица находится в совершенно другом месте - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359155601

Так же в OpenStreetMap принятно писать поясняющее слово до названия улицы если оно есть. То есть "Луговая улица" а не "улица Луговая"  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог
Glassman (2025-02-14 18:47:27+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Descriptive names like School Dropoff Point, are not used in OSM. As far as I know, we don't have a tag for dropoff point. You could search the wiki or better yet ask on c.osm.org out forum.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162492605
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-14 09:45:33+00:00): reverted.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162496045
trial (2025-03-27 21:07:08+00:00): Merci de ne pas vandaliser : cœur comporte une ligature.
https://site.sacrecoeur-ploermel.fr/
yelisey90 (2025-02-14 14:18:11+00:00): Hi! I reverted the edit: a lot of nodes forming streets were moved (possibly unintentionally), which breaks the geometry.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162505196
Sunset_Sakura (2025-02-16 08:57:24+00:00): Hi, I'm cool with tagging Bank Lane as a pedestrian street, but why should that be different from the other arcades/walkways, especially Nelson Central Arcade?
Also wondering why the layer=0 tag was removed from the businesses - it's a 3 to 4 story building so useful to explicitly state the shops are ground floor.
catgirlseraid (2025-02-16 11:56:14+00:00): thanks for reaching out, i tagged bank lane as a pedestrian street as it has addresses associated with it, as for the layer=0 tag, layers aren't mean to represent a physical location such as underground or stories in a building, in this case level https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level is specially for what floor a poi is located at within a building, i'll create a new changeset and add this now. <3
Sunset_Sakura (2025-02-16 22:51:42+00:00): True I sometimes get layer and level mixed up :)
eggie (2025-02-14 09:05:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2025-02-16 16:24:16+00:00): Dag Stollie,

De G.J. van Heuven Goedhartweg heb ik terug gezet naar de oude situatie.
Die was namelijk correct getagd met lanes=3 waarvan 
lanes:forward=2
en
lanes:backward=1

Ook de andere lanes attributen waren correct toegevoegd.

Als je zo een wijziging door wilt voeren moet wel rekening houden met alle aanwezige tags die dan overeenkomstig moeten worden aangepast.
En een correct getagde weg behoeft natuurlijk ook helemaal niet gewijzigd te worden.
Er is 1 rijbaan met 3 lanes en dat staat correct op de kaart.
Pas bij het puntstuk worden het 2 gescheiden rijbanen en niet waar er een verfstreep is getrokken.

Succes met verder mappen.
Stollie (2025-02-17 21:56:48+00:00): Okej dankje voor de uitleg. het was achteraf gezien beetje onnodig.
ChrissW-R1 (2025-07-09 22:58:40+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/changeset/168717656
Nakaner-repair (2025-02-14 09:37:42+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 150358940, 150594042, 150594238, 158266552, 160938786, 160939262.
Vinber-Pro (2025-02-14 13:49:23+00:00): bonjour,
voici un exemple pour discussion :)

les containers de tri sont plutôt en amenity=recycling

j'ai modifié https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12587234060

à bientôt :)
Vinber-Pro (2025-02-14 13:51:59+00:00): Bonjour,
à quoi correspond le pont, qu'est ce qui passe dessous ? il n'y a rien de visible.

Et on préférera le découpage de la route et l'ajout d'un attribut "bridge" sur la portion correspondante :)

à plus
Vinber-Pro (2025-02-14 14:09:57+00:00): Et une boulangerie de plus :)
le numéro de téléphone se met en format iso +33

pour les adresses, c'est un long sujet. Qui n'est pas facilité par le fait que l'éditeur iD propose systématiquement de remplir les adresses.

si tu as des envies de lectures, voici en ce moment un bout du sujet https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/relation-adresses-disparues/31142/36

à discuter à l'occasion
eggie (2025-02-14 10:16:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-02-14 10:22:30+00:00): Dag JW  Iets uitlijnen mbv de schuin genomen foto van pdok gaat lastig.

Wanneer iets niet klopt dan gewoon doorgeven aan het Kadaster. Alles is directe import.
Wanneer die aparte delen overkappingen zijn staan ze niet in de BAG. Je kunt ze dan apart intekenen met building=roof layer=1
De adresnode van de aparte unit heb ik verwijderd.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=kalkweg+5&objectId=0847200000378365&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=179875.29447247714&geometry.y=375059.6001670281&zoomlevel=14.136

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-14 10:25:46+00:00): Aangebouwde delen apart ingetekend als overkapping.. Mocht dat niet kloppen dan kun je ook iets anders van maken. De vorm klopt met de BGT.
Niet naar de dakranden kijken. 
Groet
eggie
mallewski (2025-02-14 10:07:09+00:00): I checked review_requested flag only by accident. sorry
Đuro Jiří (2025-03-06 21:27:51+00:00): Ciao,ho notato alcuni errori nella tua mappatura, ecco alcuni esempi, però prima ti consiglio di unirsi al gruppo Telegram https://t.me/+uCPMZf61adtiNDQ8

Qui hai aggiunto/a amenity=fountain sul nodo place=town https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/62515156/history
Con questo chadget https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162496882
Corretto.


Questa chiesa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233006081, che hai aggiunto/a come nodo,con questo chadget https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12603806536
è duplicato, chiesa era già presente sulla mappa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233006081
Rimosso duplicato.


Qui hai aggiunto/a historic=building come nodo, anche se edifici sono già mappati come area. Tra l'altro,nel centro storico sono tutti edifici storici. Se non è "interessante" non serve aggiungere questo tag. Rimosso.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12603759176#map=18/45.589337/9.202143


Questa chiesahttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12603770326/history è duplicato di questa chiesa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946535951
Rimosso duplicato.

Saluti
joost schouppe (2025-03-18 13:15:13+00:00): En ook deze chapel not church
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-15 10:29:08+00:00): #seo #spam
UT93 (2025-02-15 13:05:27+00:00): Relation type=firmensitz?
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-15 13:21:40+00:00): Ein(e) Einsteiger:in, welche wir gerne helfen? Oder einfach Kreativ? ;)
alealeandro (2025-02-16 11:09:06+00:00): Ja absoluter Einsteiger :) ich wollte hier nur meine Firma eintragen und habe keine Ahnung, ob ich das richtig gemacht habe?? Ist ziemlich komplex dieses OSM
alealeandro (2025-02-16 11:10:18+00:00): Nehme Ihre Hilfe sehr gerne an..
alealeandro (2025-02-16 11:16:00+00:00): Keine Ahnung?? Bitte um Hilfe. LG
s777n (2025-02-14 14:27:44+00:00): Здравствуйте. В OpenStreeеMap принята другая нумерация домов. Строение обозначается буквой с а не ст. Исправлено 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Адреса#Нумерация_домов
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-21 08:54:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/862940077/history - was this grassland2 intentional?
s777n (2025-02-14 14:28:34+00:00): Здравствуйте. Имя предназначено только для собственных имен. Например "Александровский дворец" или "Магнит". А вот местные названия, номера домов или типы объектов например "Продуктовый" или "Магазин" добавлять не нужно. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия  Исправлено
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-15 10:29:45+00:00): #seo #spam
Metzor (2025-02-16 09:14:44+00:00): Hallo 4Frankie,

Wäre smoking:outside=separated nicht richtiger? Es gibt ja ausgewiesene (und gemappte) Rauerzonen am Bahnsteig.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoking

Viele Grüße
Metzor
4Frankie (2025-02-16 11:41:29+00:00): Auf deutschen Bahnhöfen gibt es ein generelles Rauchverbot, ausgenommen sind nur gekennzeichnete Bereiche. In Metzingen kenne ich keinen.
Metzor (2025-02-16 12:43:26+00:00): Heyhey,

Gibt's aber und ist seit > 1 Jahr eingetragen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1221951228/history#map=19/48.539478/9.289917

Ich habe es auf separated gesetzt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/574714840/history

Schönen Sonntag noch!
Metzor
frydzio (2025-02-18 09:52:12+00:00): Hej,
Mała uwaga. Mapując na podstawie zdjęć z Binga pamiętaj, że ten podkład jest przesunięty. Żeby go skalibrować należy w ustawieniach podkładu ustawić przesunięcie [-1,-1]. 
W swojej edycji poprzesuwałeś tory na krańcu Miasteczko Wilanów, które były narysowane na podstawie BDOT i teraz pojawił się rozjazd.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-03-23 10:16:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163979213 where the changeset comment is: Following on from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163963906 , and see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/about-mapping-features-with-computer-vision/127790 - reverting some 'AI detected swimming pools', some of dubious quality.
ivanbranco (2025-02-14 13:44:47+00:00): Ciao, di cosa si tratta?
Da foto satellitari e Bing street view non sembra una piazza. É una via stretta, e il nodo é posizionato su un muro.
Ecomuseo di Nova Milanese nel Parco Grugnotorto Villoresi (2025-02-17 08:24:56+00:00): Ciao, si tratta di una corte.
Purtroppo non ho trovato un simbolo adatto ad indicarla e quindi ho inserito quello della piazza.
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-15 10:29:55+00:00): #seo #spam
rskedgell (2025-02-14 12:12:50+00:00): (Review requested)

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for updating the map.

One minor tweak you might wish to make is with the address. In the UK, we usually put the post town (i.e. Thatcham) into addr:city and the village, hamlet, or suburb into addr:suburb. There's more detailed information at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom
s777n (2025-02-14 15:24:40+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Автомат по продаже воды это https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Dvending_machine а не amenity=drinking_water. Если в organic maps нет нужного типа то лучше просто оставить заметку.
Имя предназначено для собственных имен. Например "Александровский дворец" или "Магнит". А вот местные названия, номера домов или типы объектов например "Продуктовый" или "Автомат разлива воды" добавлять не нужно. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия
Поправлено.
rempshaener (2025-02-14 20:28:45+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe nur eine Anmerkung:

Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u.ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: in iD markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
Marcel Kusch (2025-02-14 20:51:54+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis.
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-15 10:30:08+00:00): #seo #spam
DaveF (2025-02-14 15:54:47+00:00): Stop make edits where you fail to comprehend what you're doing.
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-15 10:30:24+00:00): #seo #spam
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-30 04:20:02+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11812744077/history has shop = vending_machine that was added in this edit
shop=vending_machine ? Is it a vending machine? Or is it shop selling vending machines?
tyr_asd (2025-08-30 07:27:16+00:00): Hey. It is actually a store room that consists only of a row of vending machines (a.k.a. "Automated convenience store"), see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dvending_machine

I was wondering if shop=vending_machine is really the best way to tag such "pseudo"-shops, but mapping the vending machines individually would have ended up with a bunch of nodes close together, which is also not ideal…
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-11 03:26:54+00:00): > row of vending machines (a.k.a. "Automated convenience store")

even more confusingly, automated convenience stored also started to appear - that looks like regular convenience store, but without any personel 

Żappka in Poland, attempted variant of Żabka

There was also attempt with Żabka Nano which is basically 14 square meters self-service vending machine.

> mapping the vending machines individually would have ended up with a bunch of nodes close together, which is also not ideal…

I do not see it as a problem, but workload in maintenance and initial mapping would be vastly higher so it is reasonable to have more workable alternative
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-11 03:27:11+00:00): shop = group_of_vending_machines

(?????)