piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2025-09-14 21:25:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The vast majority of footprints you mapped here represent buildings; I think that two do not. They could be more accurate, and all buildings I saw in the imagery likely had square footprints. Consider that you are looking at the roofs of buildings, but mapping their footprints. Some roofs may not be exact squares or circles, use the roof shape to infer what shape the footprint is likely to be. See how I mapped this area in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171937547

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners (q), or circularise them (o), because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely by hand. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, you can right click for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size that may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough else shapes will not completely square. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Jrachi (2025-09-15 05:53:24+00:00): Ciao.
Probabilmente non ti sei accorto che modificando 299063547 , hai rotto la Relazione: GTA: Salbertrand - San Giuseppe di Mompantero (11086187)

Ivo
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-14 21:41:10+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429820183

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2025-09-15 06:03:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the dopg park https://www.osm.org/way/737396261. Which opening_hours is correct?
Gregory Peony (2025-09-15 00:15:44+00:00): Hi, it looks like you mapped this footprint based on only one half of a pitched roof and did not appropriately square the footprint. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling#Typical_errors_in_the_interpretation_of_roof_geometry_from_aerial_images and see how I mapped it in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171940618  Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171938673
epoillac (2025-09-14 23:11:29+00:00): Hab den Namen falsch erinnert: Das Gebiet heißt tatsächlich "Kläne Esch".
German C (2025-12-03 17:18:32+00:00): Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste los 17 edificios que se ven en la imagen satelital? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=171938932
mueschel (2025-09-16 13:28:26+00:00): Hi,
could you check two ways, they got a strange 'm' tag, e.g.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29112853#map=19/54.440147/18.573350&layers=N
mueschel (2025-09-16 13:30:38+00:00): There are several more with other mispelled tags
stasiu512 (2025-09-16 13:52:57+00:00): hi, thanks, I'll look into it and fix it
stasiu512 (2025-09-16 13:59:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172016978
nleanba (2025-09-23 14:55:44+00:00): Bitte aneinander-gebaute Gebäude, welche als zwei separate areas getaggt sind, so belassen. Deine Änderung führt zu Informationsverlust. (So ist z.B. „addr:street=Bellevuestrasse;Hauptstrasse“ nonsense)
ntzm (2025-11-19 16:17:34+00:00): What is tunnel=cave? You should not tag for the router. If tunnel=yes is ignored by the route planner you should raise an issue with them.
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-09-15 07:06:34+00:00): Warum änderst Du ohne Kenntnisse vor Ort einfach die Rückhaltebecken und die Wege?
se7q38 (2025-09-15 08:03:28+00:00): @OSM_RogerWilco Warum beteiligst du dich nicht an der Qualitätssicherung (Validator, OSM Inspector ...)?
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-09-15 08:09:03+00:00): Das ist keine Antwort auf meine Frage. Warum hast Du hier das  Becken aufgeteilt und den Weg der durchs Wasser führt einfach gelöscht?

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/trampelpfad-durch-regenruckhaltebecken/7560
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-09-15 08:09:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1128073016
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-09-17 05:06:25+00:00): Moin se7q38,
danke, dass Du den Weg wieder eingetragen hast. Denke bitte daran: Validator-Meldungen sind als Hinweise zu verstehen, die nicht zwangsweise auch Fehler sind. Bitte immer prüfen.
Und bitte achtsam sein. Gerade bei Änderungen, die Ortskenntnis benötigen. Leiber vorher mal nachfragen.
Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
Roger
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-09-17 05:12:54+00:00): Und warum hast Du den Bach hier in einen Wassergraben geändert?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/855401002
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-09-14 23:14:33+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 167225787, 167225932, 171412889, 171412997.
stasiu512 (2025-09-15 00:46:33+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
gormur (2025-10-07 18:47:50+00:00): Hi Leida!
Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Thank you for your contribution.
I have fixed a few of the buildings you added by changing the "area=yes" to "building=yes" and a few other fixes.

But I wonder what natural=2025 means? I guess 2025 is the current year? Is that when the building was built? Or when the school opened or something? Or maybe just when you added it?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-24 11:51:07+00:00): undo Rtfm (osm wiki) vel ti-lo (osm) vel TourismInfo (osm wiki) vel Tourism_info (osm) vel Gastronomy (osm wiki) pushing their weird undiscussed tagfiddling

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175063059
Gregory Peony (2025-09-15 00:35:55+00:00): Hi Alice, the vast majority of footprints here represent buildings, though most of the circular footprints actually represent vegetation i.e. bushes and trees, due to their colour. Zooming in and out tends to aid imagery interpretation.

The NW circular footprint looks like it should be square. 

It looks like you mapped the building footprints smaller than the roof, which I recommend when mapping buildings with pitched roofs to account for roof overhang and reduce the likelihood of data overlaps, however some of the footprints are otherwise not as accurate as the imagery allows them to be in for instance, orientation, aspect ratio and position. 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

I hope this is informative. Happy mapping. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Sammyhawkrad (2025-09-15 12:02:06+00:00): Hello FACUOS, the name and brand details of banks and other POIs are necessary and useful. Please don't remove them. If this was accidental, kindly pay more attention the next time.

It would be great if you could also add the names of the restaurants, bars, and fast food joints you add to the map.

Best,
Sam
ATownBike (2025-09-15 14:59:54+00:00): These changes look to have caused some cycle routing softwares to push cyclists into the Sharpes corner roundabout and highway 20 spur headed into Anacortes. Sharpes corner roundabout was designed as a high speed highway interchange roundabout and isn't suitable for the vast majority of bicycle traffic, which is why both Anacortes and Skagit county designed and built alternative infrastructure in the area as part of the Sharpes Corner roundabout conversion for that purpose. 

It's a little frustrating that the city hasn't added this to the bike/pedestrian map, but instead posted separate maps here (individual routes for directionality of roundabout bypass travel linked separately once you scroll down):

https://www.anacorteswa.gov/1001/Pedestrian-and-Bicycle-Routes

And here is a link to the Skagit county bike map showing the shoulder cycle lanes and shared use paths added as part of the roundabout conversion, including along March's point road, which I believe is the section of shoulder bike lane missing for cycle routing of USBR 10 up to the Tommy Thompson to occur properly.

https://www.skagitcounty.net/GIS/Documents/Parks/Bike Map.pdf
Glassman (2025-09-15 15:59:56+00:00): I agree Sharpes Corner is a problem. Unfortunately, neither the state or county gave much consideration to bikes when designing it. We can add shoulder width to OSM but unless it's visibly marked on the ground, we can't add in a cycle lane. If you are interested in pursuing the issue, SKOG is interested in biking.

Also, you noticed I removed the Northern Tier routes. That route is copyright protected by Adventure Cycling. I even went to someone I know who works for them to confirm its copyright protection.l That's why we use USBR numbering.
ATownBike (2025-09-15 19:41:54+00:00): Totally makes sense.  I was unaware that it was copyright, and pulled the route from publicly available info that makes no mention of the copyright.  Glad we got that straightened out, and love all the love Skagit County cycle network is getting.
user_5359 (2025-09-15 05:56:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database.
Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes (by https://www.osm.org/changeset/171946433).

Your business isn't part of a river.
user_5359 (2025-09-15 06:10:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition!
What kind of business is Jiffy Lube?
Sooperstar (2025-09-15 10:15:38+00:00): Oil change
Fizzie-DWG (2025-09-15 02:18:41+00:00): DWG revert - sockpuppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171942338
Adam Lanza 2020 (2026-01-02 04:17:55+00:00): Cool
Bubble FTW (2026-03-18 17:18:33+00:00): Thanks
Fizzie-DWG (2025-09-15 02:18:42+00:00): DWG revert - sockpuppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171942338
Adam Lanza 2020 (2026-01-02 04:18:04+00:00): Nice
Kovoschiz (2025-09-15 09:18:14+00:00): Please don't add `=Tennis Court` , as this is already expressed by `sport=tennis`
Fizzie-DWG (2025-09-15 02:22:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18733
Adam Lanza 2020 (2026-01-02 04:17:40+00:00): Nice
Tristan West (2026-03-15 20:04:05+00:00): Thanks
Glassman (2025-09-22 20:32:59+00:00): DWG here - This sounds like you added personal information to this house. If so, it needs to be removed since personall information isn't allowed in OSM. the exception would be if the building is actually named Yuan. 

Please let me know if this is personal information or not.
Sammyhawkrad (2025-09-15 12:26:48+00:00): Hello once again F y. As I commented on a previous changeset, tagging a building with building=yes is enough. Don't add name=building because the name tag is reserved for actual names (e.g. Jubilee House, Aseda House).

Best,
Sam
Mxdanger (2025-10-16 21:57:18+00:00): Is construction here completed? If so the tags for buildings, roads, and footpaths should probably be updated to no longer be tagged with construction
Briar Baron (2026-01-23 03:45:05+00:00): Hello there!

May I know if there is any local ordinance or probably a visible street name sign that bears the name "Magsalay Street" (235229953) that made it to one of Sergio Osmeña Sr.'s streets?

Hoping for your response on this inquiry.
uᴉʍOꓨ (2026-01-23 03:52:07+00:00): The street name was derived from this POI: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4331032022/history/1

Thanks for looking.
hoserab (2025-09-15 18:59:55+00:00): Hi there Djjrjdjrje,

FYI you don't need to (and *shouldn't*) append the name of something like the Dalhousie Station shopping area with "Shopping Centre". You don't need to add this information to the `name=*` tag to distinguish between the shopping area and the LRT station; that's what the other tags like `building=retail`, `shop-mall`, etc. are for.

Please have a read through this for more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

In this case I've deleted the `name=*`, `website=*` and `shop=*` tags here entirely, as it's not just this one building that is "Dalhousie Station": it's the entire shopping area (including the other half-dozen buildings on the south side of the area), which is already on the map as an encompassing way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9331945).

Cheers, and happy mapping. :)
TrickyFoxy (2025-09-26 21:54:35+00:00): 👋  Водопад уже отмечен же
NeisBot (2025-09-15 03:56:39+00:00): Hi Fernada Guaman, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Updated name and shop details of feature"
Layft Greater (2025-09-27 12:30:02+00:00): not a highway=living_street
Ryan Watern (2025-09-15 04:07:10+00:00): Not sure how "for bridge" got added lol but its tags for the construction site.
Colbertson (2025-09-22 12:56:01+00:00): you left a "genus=B" here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13118918541
Mister_R2 (2025-09-22 13:35:29+00:00): Yup sorry is supposed to be Betula
the_edge01 (2025-09-18 02:20:03+00:00): Nice job on the quick update!
NeisBot (2025-09-15 08:36:19+00:00): Hi holhen, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Updated building properties including classification and added levels on several school buildings"
MassCartog (2025-09-15 18:32:35+00:00): Hi Welcome to OSM. Please read with OSM wiki page about the correct use of the Name tag. See "Name is the name only" and "Names are not for descriptions" sections.

Thanks

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
NeisBot (2025-09-15 05:21:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-26 14:01:21+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171946362
hoserab (2025-09-18 16:41:37+00:00): Hi Quinn,

Thanks for your contributions. If you could elaborate more on what you were doing in your changeset comments it would be much appreciated. E.g. in this changeset you not only were adding houses and other things in Suffield, but also in Teepee Creek, hundreds of kilometres northwest of Suffield.

Thanks :)
chath_tsu (2025-09-15 06:09:09+00:00): thank you!
NeisBot (2025-09-15 06:02:34+00:00): Hi Ishrat28, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 86% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 70 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=171946565
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-15 06:10:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325897495

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2025-09-15 06:21:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-26 14:00:57+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171950143
TrickyFoxy (2025-09-26 21:55:02+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее
RushMM (2025-09-15 19:10:28+00:00): Sorry about that, thanks for fixing!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171947654
Fizzie-DWG (2025-09-16 03:08:47+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18737
ilias_ (2025-09-15 10:16:12+00:00): Thanks for fixing them, the user Amine doesn't seem to care about comments regarding his terrible mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171913931
Aya Samir (2025-09-15 11:03:37+00:00): Hi ilias_;
You're welcome. We are here to make OSM better
Best regards,
Aya Samir
NeisBot (2025-09-15 06:46:41+00:00): Hi Celmfire, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added payment methods and opening hours to a feature"
eggie (2025-09-15 13:14:13+00:00): Dag Stegink,
Ik heb name= ..... aangepast naar note= ....  (aanwijzing voor medemappers). Het is geen straatnaam.
surface=rijplaten vervangen door metal.

Verder loopt de weg door het water en had geen verbinding met het fietspad. 
Kan regulier verkeer nu ook over deze weg, want daar routeert het nu wel voor. Is dat wel de bedoeling?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=171947853


MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-15 13:18:53+00:00): access=no
emergency=yes
????
eggie (2025-09-15 13:26:53+00:00): All bovenstaand aangepast.
Laat even weten of access=no hier van toepassing is.
gr eggie
Stegink08 (2025-09-15 13:29:57+00:00): Goedemiddag Eggie,

acces=no is hier inderdaad van toepassing het gaat om een tijdelijke weg die puur voor de hulpdiensten is aangelegd. Zodra deze weer verwijderd is zal ik deze ook weer hier verwijderen. 
mvg Stegink08
eggie (2025-09-15 13:35:30+00:00): Oke Top!
eggie (2025-09-15 08:02:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Die bruggetjes tussen die weilanden hebben  voor ons geen functie in de routering en kunnen beter  als vlak worden ingetekend met man_made=bridge layer=1
Dan ben je ook van die foutmeldingen af van losliggende wegen (zonder verdere verbinding) 
access=private heeft ook weinig zin, want de bruggetjes hebben verder geen verbindingen.

foutmelding: warnings:disconnected_way:highway 	4
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Sepiver (2025-09-17 08:57:57+00:00): @eggie Bedankt voor de feedback, ik snap wat je bedoelt. Ik ben alleen nog het programma etc aan het verkennen, dus ik heb er 1 geprobeerd, zie changeset #172052354. Is dit zo hoe je het bedoelt? Dan kan ik de rest ook updaten.
eggie (2025-09-17 09:10:26+00:00): Yep... Dat is wat ik bedoel..

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=172052354

Wanneer er echt een pad naar loopt is het natuurlijk weer anders.

Mapse,
eggie
Fizzie-DWG (2025-09-16 03:09:06+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18738
jespergbg (2025-09-21 06:31:56+00:00): Detta är jätteproblematiskt för oss som använder CityStrides eftersom den baseras på Openstreetmap. Vi kan inte ut och springa på Europavägar utan väggrenar eller gångbanor. Det gäller inte bara denna typ av väg utan även av- och påfarter till motorvägar osv.
Jag förstår att lagen tillåter det men kanske behövs en utveckling av kartans parametrar då det är ytterst olämpligt och extremt farligt.
archie (2025-09-21 07:29:51+00:00): 1. Jag har tidigare kommenterat detta här: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166191633#map=19/57.707082/11.992433 

2. osm är en oberoende tjänst. Taggningen återger vad som gäller på stället - i det här fallet huruvida det finns ett lagligt, skyltat förbud mot gångförbud, vilket det inte finns. Taggningen i osm skall inte anpassas till annan kartvisningstjänst. Detta är en grundläggande princip i osm. 

3. det finns vägsträckor som är skyltade med gångtrafikantförbud. Dessa är på osm taggade med foot=no (t ex: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231211101). 

4. när det gäller taggningen så finns det inget subjektivt utrymme. Det kan finnas andra vägsträckor där den ene tycker att det är farligt att gå, medan den andre menar motsatsen. Taggningen kan inte baseras på sådana rent subjektiva överväganden. 

5. du har rätt med att man inte bör gå på de här vägsträckorna. För att få folk att inte gå där finns bestämmelser i svensk trafiklagstiftning som tar sikte på trafikanters beteende. Det görs inte genom att åsätta en egenskap på vägsträckan (skyltat gångförbud) som kan omsättas till taggningen foot=no.