piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Sorain (2025-02-11 16:22:04+00:00): The erroneous polygon was in the process of being corrected by me together with a team of OSM cartographer members from Romania. With your changeset rollback, streets and sidewalks created in that changeset were lost. Ask before you do something stupid like this. I see that you edit chaotically everywhere on the planet, I don't understand this maniacal rush to edit places you don't even know. You reversed and abandoned the lost information without even bothering to mark it back. Btw, not even with your reverse movement, the polygon is correct. If you want to do something good, go and modify only the polygon of the forest node by node, do not revert the changeset full of data

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162397964
s777n (2025-02-17 21:06:51+00:00): Здравствуйте. Ваша правку была удалена. Вы нарисовали дорогу поверх дороги и не соединили ее с остальной дорожной сетью.
lankapuhelin (2025-02-25 09:41:38+00:00): Hei! Lopeta fixme-tagien järjestelmällinen poistaminen ilman tagiin merkityn arvon ratkaisemista, kiitos.
liljaadeliina (2025-03-03 09:42:32+00:00): Kiitos viestistäsi.
Szymson (2025-02-11 15:55:47+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kategorie-drog-w-woj-pomorskim/111839/175
nevw (2025-02-11 12:55:29+00:00): Hi, the source you used is copyrighted and I don’t believe osm has a specific waiver to use this data.
https://www.landgate.wa.gov.au/terms-of-use/
Suvarna Mithun (2025-02-12 05:15:27+00:00): Hi,
Simper Road appears consistently across Google, Esri and Main Roads travel map (which uses Google Maps).
In Western Australia, Landgate are the owners of road naming. The official source can be viewed here: https://maps.slip.wa.gov.au/landgate/locate/. Main Roads uses Landgate data. 
Because the source is copyrighted , does it mean that we cannot update this road?
nevw (2025-02-12 05:55:22+00:00): I suppose it is fine to occasionally check the name on the Landgate site but as it is a copyrighted source you should not routinely use the info provided to update osm unless they have provided explicit permission to do so. There is a list of sources that can be used in osm here
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources and you may a suitable source there. I expect others have already tried to obtain permission from Landgate without success.
If you feel that I am mistaken and I may well be as I am not from WA, then I suggest you ask the osm community on our forum or mailing list. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Mapping_Community
aharvey (2025-04-15 06:23:59+00:00): We can't use Landgate data, their data is copyright and not compatible with OSM's licensing requirements.

We can use the Main Roads WA data which is CC BY and which we have a waiver for. We even have it as a background imagery layer in JOSM and overlay imagery layer in iD, all out of the box.

In that dataset it's Coyrecup for the southern section only, then Simper from the junction with Coyrecup North Road.
aharvey (2025-04-15 06:28:33+00:00): There is a Bing Streetside image we can use here which although hard to read seems to say "Coyrecup North" so I'm tempted to therefore set this section as that per Bing Streetside, and per Main Roads WA. It was named 9 years ago so signage may be different now.
Suvarna Mithun (2025-05-13 03:56:12+00:00): Hi,

I hope you are well.

I'm seeking assistance regarding an issue we’ve encountered with road naming inconsistencies in OpenStreetMap (OSM). I work with the Department of Fire and Emergency Services (DFES) in Western Australia, and we use Mapbox as our mapping platform, which relies on OSM data.

In emergency situations such as bushfires, we provide the community with timely information about safe evacuation routes. However, we’ve observed that some road names in OSM do not align with those in official sources like Landgate or Main Roads WA. This discrepancy can cause confusion among community members during critical times.

As per a previous discussion, I understand that OSM cannot directly incorporate Landgate data due to licensing restrictions, but that Main Roads WA data may be compatible. Since Main Roads WA sources its data from Landgate, we’re exploring whether it can be recognized as an official and permissible data source for OSM in Western Australia.

Could you please advise on the process for having Main Roads WA data reviewed and potentially approved as an official source for OSM editing? Any guidance on  next steps would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you for your time and support.

Regards,
Suvarna Mithun
Department of Fire and Emergency Services, WA
aharvey (2025-05-13 05:31:13+00:00): The Main Roads WA data such as https://catalogue.data.wa.gov.au/dataset/mrwa-road-network per the Australian Data Sources page at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#Western_Australia shows it may be used since it is CC BY 4.0 and Main Roads WA completed the OSMF LWG's CC BY waiver at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:OSM_CCBY_Consent-MainRoadsWA.pdf

That's sufficient for us. It's already an approved data source for OSM, and selected data is enabled by default as background layers in editors including iD and JOSM.

Landgate data https://www.landgate.wa.gov.au/location-data-and-services/discovering-landgate-data/ isn't under an open license and not can't be used for OSM.
Suvarna Mithun (2025-05-13 05:38:22+00:00): Thank you for your response.
Does this mean that OSM is already ingesting data from Main Roads?
The reason being last time we had a discrepancy in road name - landgate, main roads and google had the correct name but OSM still had the old road name.
Thanks
aharvey (2025-05-13 06:06:13+00:00): There's no automatic ingesting of data, it's up to mappers to decide what to incorporate. There have been coordinated efforts in the past by Microsoft's mapping team to resolve differences in road names between OSM and government datasets.

I believe the resolution in those prior cases you noted was to update them in OSM, but there were still done case by case.
TheSwavu (2025-05-13 06:07:19+00:00): OSM is a volunteer based mapping project. Unless someone is interested enough in checking OSM against MWRA, then it's not going to be automatically ingested.
Suvarna Mithun (2025-05-13 06:37:52+00:00): Thank you both.
Are there any mechanism in OSM wherein they compare the existing map against a source to check if they are outdated/incorrect without users reporting them.
aharvey (2025-05-13 08:39:31+00:00): Within the wider OSM ecosystem, there are tools people have built to try and compare and flag differences, but I note that you can't just assume that OSM is wrong and a particular government dataset is correct if there are differences, so each case should be addressed on a case by case basis.

OSM tends to follow the on the ground rule and maps based on signage. All datasets may contain errors or may be outdated, including OSM and government published data.

It wouldn't be that hard to build a tool to compare road names from OSM to Main Roads WA.
aharvey (2025-05-13 10:40:01+00:00): PS. You might want to drop into the OSM Hackathon tomorrow https://geogeeks.org/2025/0514_osm-hackathon-city-of-canning.html
Mannivu (2025-02-11 10:37:03+00:00): Why did you split the road? I'm unsure if there's a sign stating hgv=no (I guess there is, but il pass by this afternoon to check), but if there's one I don't get why only a portion should have that tag and not the whole road
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162380050
goedegazelle (2025-02-12 09:50:53+00:00): Ik zie de tekst "note=nl_no_zebra" toegevoegd aan een bestaande zebra (tenzij de situatie onlangs is veranderd):

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.200338/5.965512

Ik zie een zebra die niet bestaat die (voor zover ik kan zien) werd toegevoegd op basis van PDOK:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.472331/6.063919
Peter Elderson (2025-02-12 16:49:32+00:00): Ha, dank voor het melden. De eerste is een tagplakkfoutje denk ik, die zebra is duidelijk te zien op beelden. 
De tweede, daar zie ik op streetviewbeelden van 2 - 3 jaar geleden een zebra, en op recente satellietbeelden in satellietdataportaal zie ik hem volgens mij nog steeds. Helaas zijn de meeste beelden niet erg duidelijk, maar als ik ze in de tijd volg is op een paar wel een zebrapad te zien. Het NDW zebradetectieprogramma gaf dit aan als een zebra, ik denk dat de datum begin 2024 ligt. Als er vrij recent aan de weg geverfd is dan zou hij weg kunnen zijn... wacht, ik ga nog eens heel goed kijken... ja, het lijkt erop dat er recent een "tabole" is gemaakt op het krijspunt, en de waarswchuwingsstrepen daarvan lijken op een zebra. Ik haal hem weg!
Peter Elderson (2025-02-12 16:52:04+00:00): Niet een tabole op het krijspunt, maar een table op het kruispunt.
goedegazelle (2025-02-12 23:57:35+00:00): Super!
eggie (2025-02-11 09:11:11+00:00): Dag Rembo  Een naam doet niets in OSM Ook de aard van het bedrijf toevoegen. Bv office=company
Ik heb het aangepast.
MVG
eggie
Szymson (2025-02-11 15:51:51+00:00): Tertiary nie ma nic wspólnego z bazą wojskową:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kategorie-drog-w-woj-pomorskim/111839/175
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-11 21:48:16+00:00): #seo #spam
Timmy_Tesseract (2025-05-23 16:34:30+00:00): Hi Carl, welcome to OSM and thanks for adding this school to the map!
Nakaner-repair (2025-08-12 15:43:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 170348716 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Rostas Krisztian: low-quality edits by MAPS.ME, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/134066
Pavel_Š (2025-02-15 12:48:02+00:00): V části ulice Tilhonova po vašich úpravách chybělo trolejové vedené a byla tak porušena relace linky 33. Již opraveno, prosím vždy ověřujte korektnost dat, jinak se ničí práce druhých.
MIGORMCZ (2025-02-15 18:55:09+00:00): Konzistentnost relací při editování vždy kontroluji. Zrovna u linky 33 jsem to určitě kontroloval. Je nutno respektovat to, že člověk není neomylný, což absence upozornění na porušení relací ještě umocňuje. Děkuji za pochopení.

(A s tím, že podle vás ničím práci ostatních, rozhodně nesouhlasím. Mapy se snažím vylepšovat, tak jako každý jiný. Stejně tak se jako ostatní editoři můžu dopustit chyb.)
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-11 09:11:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2521179550
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1117146590

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
HAALAND_ (2026-03-04 06:24:13+00:00): 请问您为何不在添加中文的时候也添加“name:zh”标签?
HAALAND_ (2026-03-04 06:24:59+00:00): 修改一下↑
请问您为何不在添加中文的时候也添加部分国家的“name:zh”标签?
H@mlet (2025-02-11 10:36:17+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dchalet?uselang=en `tourism=chalet` est plus proche du terrain, même si c'est encore un peu excessif pour le logement proposé. Hotel ne convient vraiment pas.

Le tag building est documenté là : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building?uselang=en
Je pense que `building=cabin` sera le plus adapté au vu des photos sur le site indiqué. S'il est possible de mettre n'importe quels tags et valeurs, ce n'est pas recommandé car ce  n'est pas interprété par les logiciels utilisateurs. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like

Idéalement il faudrait cartographier chaque structure séparément, avec des polygones. Mais un contributeur suivant pourra le faire quand l'imagerie aérienne sera à jour.

À votre disposition si vous avez besoin de plus de conseils.

Cordialement.
H@mlet (2025-02-11 10:25:25+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM.

L'accès à ces toilettes n'a pas possible sans payer, donc pour moi `fee=no` ne convient pas.

Je pense que le mieux est d'inventer un `fee=pass` ou `fee=flat`, pour ne pas induire les utilisateurs en erreur.

Sinon le [wiki](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fee?uselang=en) parle de `membership=yes`.

Enfin `access=permissive` ne convient pas, soit c'est accessible à tous le monde (`access=yes`), soit seulement aux clients du passe (`access=customers`) mais ce n'est peut-être pas indispensable.

Pour préciser les détails sur ces toilettes, vous pouvez consulter le [wiki](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets). Je pense à la position, l'accès à l'eau (chaude), papier, etc.

Cordialement.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-12 22:47:30+00:00): Why are you adding fake motorways? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162382178
gt3400 (2025-02-13 07:54:39+00:00): This is an official practice area for the firefighters and A122 is the official name for Austria’s shortest motorway. See the discussion in the corresponding note. If you think it is not appropriately mapped feel free to to change.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-13 12:41:44+00:00): Where can I find the "corresponding note"?
gt3400 (2025-02-13 17:40:45+00:00): Note #4324534
silversurfer83 (2025-02-11 15:57:50+00:00): Moin :)

alternativ wäre in diesem Fall "short_name=*" noch eine Variante :)

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162382188
Leitstelle Kassel 3 (2025-02-11 21:24:22+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis , wird von mir aktualisiert.
CoyKoi (2025-02-12 01:10:04+00:00): Please enter a useful changeset comment describing your changes
CoyKoi (2025-02-12 01:13:08+00:00): amenity=parking_space is not intended to represent bus-stops
Sanniu (2025-02-12 07:20:43+00:00): Hi, the https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1358999148 has no tags, can you add appropriate tagging?
eggie (2025-02-11 10:30:59+00:00): Dag KK  Ik heb de wikidata verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
CaHein (2025-02-11 10:54:21+00:00): Moin Langläufer,
hatte ich da beim editieren fehler hinterlassen? Was kann ich zukünftig besser machen?
Langlaeufer (2025-02-11 11:44:40+00:00): Hab vor allem die Geometrie verbessert, deine Änderung hat nur mein Augenmerk drauf gerichtet
Langlaeufer (2025-02-11 13:50:44+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162382991
CaHein (2025-02-11 14:20:33+00:00): Interessante Ansicht.
eggie (2025-02-11 10:18:46+00:00): Dag Kohtafiontan2

Beter geen name=... gebruiken wanneer je iets beschrijft.
Waarom geen amenity=bicycle_parking
Dat geeft een symbool. 
En er is al een node met fietsverhuur. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-11 10:28:29+00:00): Namen verwijderd.  De tagging moet het doen. bicycle_parking toegevoegd als OSM tag. 
Groet
eggie
tbi1233 (2025-02-11 14:37:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9470922849

De ce înlocuiești contact:facebook cu username-ul tău? Am mai văzut asta
dodelinho (2025-02-11 15:04:33+00:00): E de la auto-complete din Firefox. De obicei incerc sa repar, dar imi mai scapa unele
sab27 (2026-05-17 15:06:30+00:00): Hi @MrJc15 thanks for mapping! I see that you tagged buildings here as building=industrial rather than building=yes. Please let me know whether you based this tagging on local knowledge. If not (i.e. if you are a remote mapper like myself) they should be retagged as building=yes

Please let me know and please keep mapping :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162383127
Jose Luis Infante (2025-02-11 19:23:58+00:00): Gràcies per la teva aportació, encara que no és gaire correcta. Primer, has classificat la pista poliesportiva com a parc, i segon, el camí està molt malament dibuixat.
Si us plau, arranja aquests errors.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162383156
eggie (2025-02-11 10:20:58+00:00): Dag Kohta

Geen nametag gebruiken om iets te beschrijven. 
Gebruik leisure=pitch sport=soccer;basketball

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-11 10:22:37+00:00): Aangepast als bovenstaand.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-11 00:39:59+00:00): DWG revert - vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167468113
Nathan_A_RF (2025-02-26 18:29:44+00:00): Hey, make sure to use the highway_authority_ref tag for road numbers, not the name tag.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 00:57:59+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165050348
Taya_S (2025-02-11 11:41:36+00:00): Hi Mwiche,

I noticed that you created a number of ways that overlap already mapped substations/industrial areas. 

Old ways:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/611221500
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/611221499
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345239673

Ways you added:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1358999567
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1358999566
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359008051

Sincerely,
Taya Snijder
SomeoneElse (2025-02-15 00:44:58+00:00): Thanks - this has reappeared now
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-11 21:49:26+00:00): #seo #spam
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-11 10:40:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12578625450

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Taya_S (2025-02-24 08:17:24+00:00): Hallo, je hebt hier een node gemaakt met alleen maar de tag "created_by=On Wheels 44" en geen verdere informatie. Ik denk dat hier iets mis is gegaan. Ik zal de node verwijderen
VLD549 (2025-03-25 15:45:47+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. Bing Maps shows it to be neither Wildestraat nor Muishoeken, but Langelede. I've also learned that we should refrain from using Google Maps as a source for names. Could you provide a link of some sort that shows it to be Muishoeken, some other link than Google Maps?

Thank you!
richlv (2025-02-11 10:38:47+00:00): Sveiki, paldies par kartes papildināšanu.
Te pareizs mājas numurs būtu 15 - kas ir "1", vai tas ir dzīvokļa numurs?
somehundred (2025-02-11 10:45:02+00:00): Iekomentējāt pats savā izmaiņu kopā...
richlv (2025-02-11 11:48:11+00:00): Meh, paldies - sanāca apmaldīties diezgan veikli :)
ChromeLotus (2025-02-19 22:10:08+00:00): Hello Zarraf Tajwar Adib, I am reaching out to you about the changes to the road network in Bagerhat and Satkhira.

There are classification changes made to major highways in these cities that are leading to classification inconsistencies across stretches of highway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/623183192, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165282419,). 

There are also link roads with link classifications that do not match those of the connecting roads, and do not fit the OSM definition of a link (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/612847888, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1267872646).

I’ve noticed a frequent use of both secondary and tertiary classifications for highways that access residential areas (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268097939, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/612844725). Classifications such as residential or unclassified are better suited for the roads used to access these areas. Other community members have voiced their concern of over classifying roads in these scenarios (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149391127).

I am curious about the sources you are using to support these modifications. What are your thoughts on these classification suggestions?

-ChromeLotus
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-11 21:50:03+00:00): #seo #spam
fndoder (2025-02-11 18:00:23+00:00): У второго корпуса школы 99 я поменял name на просто "Школа №99", старое название оставил в description

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162401515
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 17:26:41+00:00): Hello!

You used
access=privatem
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507595373/history

Have you maybe meant
access=private
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
eggie (2025-02-11 11:08:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   He is niet de bedoeling om data uit OSM te verwijderen omdat dit prive zou zijn.
We kun je aangeven met access=private dat onbevoegden er niet mogen komen.
Ik draai de verwijdering weer even terug
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-02-11 11:10:38+00:00): Data teruggezet..  access=private toegevoegd.
Het zal niet routeren voor ongenode gasten.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-11 11:13:05+00:00): Dag Robert.

De format van de postcode is zonder spatie in OSM.
Ik heb het aangepast.

MVG
eggie
TrickyFoxy (2025-02-11 21:17:43+00:00): Вы рисуете несуществующие линии дорог. Добавляйте имена существующим линиям кликнув на них. При необходимости в правом меню есть кнопка Разрезать линию
ReScQ (2025-02-12 10:23:32+00:00): Hey suyhoo, danke für deine Änpassung der Alleenstraße. Ich kenne jetzt nicht den aktuellen Stand (2025), aber sollte hier nicht am besten der östliche Radweg entfernt werden und dann kein oneway auf der Alleenstraße. 
Zusätzlich sollte hier auch die ein bicycle=yes und das maxspeed entfernt werden.
Vielleicht wäre es auch sinnvoll den westlichen Fußweg auch zu entfernen, da ja der gesamte Bereich eine Fußgängerzone jetzt ist und darauf Bauten stehen.
Was meinst du dazu oder hast du einen besseren Vorschlag?
suyhoo (2025-02-12 11:23:27+00:00): Hey Nanoilite,
momentan ist es so, dass der Radverkehr vom Kreisverkehr kommend auf der Alleenstraße geführt wird. Der entgegenkommende Radverkehr wird weiterhin auf dem gemeinsamen Fuß- und Radweg auf der östlichen Seite geführt.
Stimmt, den Fußgängerweg westlich der Alleenstraße am Stadtbalkon nicht so optimal. Ich schaue mal die Tage wie ich es ändere.
Danke vielmals für die Hinweise :-)
Grüße
eggie (2025-02-11 11:19:34+00:00): Dag Robert  Graaf bijtaggen op de reeds bestaande BAG adresnode.. Geen spaties aanbrengen in postcodes.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-11 11:22:58+00:00): Is dit werkelijk een crematorium of een uitvaartcentrum
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dfuneral_directors

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-11 11:26:07+00:00): Info samengevoegd en als bovenstaand aangepast.
MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-11 11:30:46+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12578713410

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
goefra (2025-02-11 11:49:30+00:00): 👍 Würde sagen passt.
mike140 (2025-02-11 11:58:36+00:00): Доброго дня! В OSM ми додаємо адмінкордони лише до об'єктів, що мають власну адміністрацію/орган влади - наразі найнижчій рівень - це громади - адмінрівень 7. До всіх інших додаємо лише тег place. До речі, яке ваше джерело кордонів населених пунктів?
mueschel (2025-02-12 12:13:09+00:00): Hi,
you added about 30 tags that are not used in any other place - this is (in general) too much for a simple shop.

Usually we don't map all the different services and products of a shop in detail - that is just too much information for a geo-database like OSM.

For some other tags, check the wiki for

min_age
surveillance
contact:instagram
language:*
notmyproblem1 (2025-12-12 10:33:19+00:00): k thanks
Nathan_A_RF (2025-03-09 22:14:10+00:00): Why did you change the highway tag on these roads?
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-11 21:50:23+00:00): #seo #spam
citrula (2025-02-13 06:53:38+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162454491
Przecicinek (2025-07-04 08:22:05+00:00): Cześć, proszę o poprawę: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359031839. Podjazdy mapujemy jako highway=service + service=driveway i na pewno nie dajemy nazwy. Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:service%3Ddriveway

Pozdrawiam
mavl (2025-02-17 16:01:47+00:00): Здравствуйте. В комментарии к этому пакету правок указано "нет проезда для легкового транспорта", но к дороге добавляется тег motor_vehicle=no. Подскажите, пожалуйста, как связан тег motor_vehicle=no и легковой транспорт?  
  
Какие именно запрещающие дорожные знаки стоят на местности для этой дороги?
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-11 22:14:31+00:00): Hallo tczolitron, was wurde denn "korrigiert"? Danke.