piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
cyberatlas (2025-12-25 07:00:40+00:00): Nie, po prostu ta droga jest otwarta, staram się poprawiać mapę
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-26 09:24:36+00:00): a skąd wiesz że MOP jest otwarty?

budowa MOPu może trwać przy otwartej drodze
MxxCon (2025-12-22 21:49:03+00:00): There's no camera in the middle of the roadway intersection. As such this edit reverted in full.
stasiu512 (2025-12-22 22:14:39+00:00): Cześć, te note z głównego ciągu chyba można już usunąć
ika-chan! (2025-12-31 04:50:43+00:00): We have repeatedly asked you not to add fake junction layouts and filter roads that do not exist. The fake additions have been removed.
eggie (2025-12-22 18:59:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-22 19:02:35+00:00): Ahh... Die had je al ontvangen.. 

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176277540

landuse=residential is niet de juiste tag voor woningen.
De bebouwde kom is landuse =residential. Je hebt dus de tagging van woningen verwijderd.
De bebouwde kom ontbreekt nu ook. 

MVG
eggie
Tom van Rijn (2025-12-22 19:13:10+00:00): Goedenavond Eggie, Het was mijn intentie om "Under construction" weg te halen, niet de bebouwde kom. Daar is dan iets fout gegaan. Ik zag overigens net in beeld dat jij weer iets hebt toegevoegd, dus ik hoop dat het zo weer correct staat.
eggie (2025-12-22 19:16:33+00:00): Hoi..

De gebouwen heb ik hersteld en die toegangsweg ingetekend mbv de BGT.
Een ander complex had je wel correct aangepast.

Het klopt weer.

Mapse,
eggie
eggie (2025-12-22 19:19:17+00:00): De bebouwde kom doet het ook weer.  :)
Paar keer ctrl f5 voor het effect
Jakka (2025-12-24 08:43:19+00:00): Wegen niet verwijderen die bestaan echt. Zet daar een access=* op
eggie (2025-12-22 19:24:06+00:00): Oke Tom, maar dat fietspad zal toch geen eenrichtingsverkeer zijn?

Gr eggie
Tom van Rijn (2025-12-22 19:27:27+00:00): Daar zou je gelijk in kunnen hebben. Ik fiets er morgen weer langs, dus zal even wat nauwkeuriger kijken.
eggie (2025-12-22 19:28:32+00:00): Kijk even hier
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.26116,4.758791,19/?datastrip=20251104_PNEO-03

Die fietspad afslag is er ook niet meer. 
Het fietspad langs de Mensinglaan zie ik ook niet meer.
eggie (2025-12-22 19:34:18+00:00): Ik heb het even voorlopig aangepast aan sat dataportaal en de transparant van de BGT.
maxspeed 50 verwijderd van fietspad en het parallelfietspad naar het oosten verwijderd van de Mendinglaan. 

Even gaan kijken lijkt me een goed idee.

Groet,
eggie
Tom van Rijn (2025-12-22 19:39:45+00:00): Ik was er ook mee bezig, het liep vast toen we tegelijk aanpassingen maakten. Maar ik geloof dat we aardig hetzelfde idee hadden. Dat miniscule fietspaadje en een overbodig voetpad weg. Van het paaltje weet ik zeker dat ie er staat, want daar reed een auto een keer tegenaan haha. Rubber ding, auto had geen schade.
eggie (2025-12-22 20:08:37+00:00): Ahhh   dat bedoelde je met marker=yes..

Die had ik verwijderd. De juiste tag is barrier=bollard  met bollard=felexible op een node.
Pas jij dat nog aan?
eggie (2025-12-22 20:08:56+00:00): typo bollard=flexible
eggie (2025-12-22 20:11:34+00:00): Er lag ook nog een weg op een weg. De hortensialaan sloeg rechtsaf richting Yuverta. Daaronder lag een highway=service. Dat heb ik ook aangepast.
Ik kijk gewoon naar de foutmeldingen die ik krijg. Editor JOSM is daar goed in.
eggie (2025-12-22 20:12:37+00:00): Je zou evet nog kunnen kijken welk type fietspad het is..

G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway
eggie (2025-12-22 20:16:44+00:00): motor_vehicle=no heb ik verwijderd van het paaltje. Het zal per default niet routeren voor motorvoertuigen muv moped en mofa.
Wanneer je motor_vehicle=no gaat taggen dan routeert het niet meer voor moped en mofa.
Dat zijn immers motorvoertuigen in OSM.
MassCartog (2025-12-22 19:24:08+00:00): Hello again, sock puppet accounts are not allowed on OSM. Also knowingly misusing the tagging system, removing the feature type, and incorrectly using the name tags considered vandalism.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism

Info:
Kaushik_US - ID 23638597 (sock puppet)
Mani NJ - ID 23636455 (main account)
Kamil Adam (2026-05-01 13:01:38+00:00): czemu wejscia sa odlaczone? byly chyba dobrze sa jako punkty ostatnia byla twoja zmiana
olo81 (2026-05-01 13:04:48+00:00): Wejścia połączone z linią budynku uniemożliwiają impart budynków.
olo81 (2026-05-01 13:05:00+00:00): Import
Martinligabue (2025-12-22 19:47:16+00:00): attento che la direzione delle panchine è in gradi, non in sedicesimi, hai modo di correggere?
Andrea Del Sarto (2026-01-08 22:19:29+00:00): Buona sera Mirto1312,
la maggior parte dei nomi inseriti andrebbero messi nel tag loc_name perchè i nomi ufficiali sono quelli riportati sulla CTR Toscana
Inoltre identificare un "vallino" come un corso d'acqua non è corretto
Puoi aggiornare i tag?

saluti
Mirto1312 (2026-01-17 17:48:45+00:00): aggiornato con il tag loc_name, grazie mille! 
Invece come potrei identificare i vallini? (nella toponomastica locale, indica un piccolo ruscello stagionale di fondovalle - c'è un tag migliore?)
Andrea Del Sarto (2026-02-04 15:32:48+00:00): tag name = nome ufficiale Regione Toscana
loc_name = nome locale

puoi verificare i nomi ufficiali dalla cartoteca della regione toscana, sezione toponomastica

ho provveduto ad aggiornare quello che non era stato sistemato

saluti
Taya_S (2026-01-15 07:45:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted. Please make sure you comply with the import guidelines first. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177247573
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:52:20+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13358948110 v4

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Health and wellness center in Radcliff KY"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 17:52:36+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176713236
coatix (2025-12-26 13:48:48+00:00): n3034087660 ist die Adresse, bitte Kik als separaten Node eintragen :)
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:52:21+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13372469308 v2

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Hair salon in Elkhart"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 17:53:25+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176713268
(Deleted leftovers after several edits)
streckenkundler (2025-12-22 20:42:05+00:00): pass bitte auf, ich glaube, du schrottest gerade Wanderrouten...
z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17616034

knatschige Grüße... :(
streckenkundler (2025-12-26 21:23:17+00:00): Ich hab im Rahmen meiner Möglichkeiten diese und einige andere Wanderwege repariert. Passe hier bitte sehr auf... ID ist z.T. ungeeignet im Umgang mit solchen Relationen.
 JOSM wäre da das bessere Mittel deiner Wahl! Bei solchen Themenwegen gibt es z.B. bei https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#routelist?map=14.0/52.4018/13.2635 eine Analyse-Möglichkeit... Deine Erstellung straßenbegleitender Fuß-/ Rad und Fußwege finde ich gut. Achte aber unbedingt darauf, daß du nicht zuviel Segemente verschmelzt. Achte bitte darauf, daß es an Kreuzungen auch Überwege gibt. In einen weiteren Schritt werden solche Fußwanderwege auf die von dir erstellen Segmente verlagert werden müssen... 

Fehlerbereinigende Grüße,

Sven
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:52:23+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13370189766 v2

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Boutique in Tipton IN"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 17:53:27+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176713269
(Deleted leftovers after several edits)
bearvulturegoat (2026-01-24 02:00:02+00:00): not sure this is an ALPR - looks like just a camera
frumpybmore (2026-07-02 20:47:10+00:00): There is both a Flock camera and a PTZ security camera on the pole.
MassCartog (2025-12-22 20:24:46+00:00): Note I fixed power line mistake in next commit
coatix (2025-12-26 13:46:19+00:00): Adresse wurde verschoben, reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176440118
schobbish (2025-12-23 22:20:05+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM! I see that you have added the tag "name:en"="Thackery St.", presumably to indicate that "Street" can be abbreviated. On OSM we generally spell out those abbreviations, so "Thackery Street" is correct and the tag is redundant. See https://osm.wiki/Abbreviations for more info.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176281139
Frank Peng (2025-12-23 01:35:15+00:00): Hello Thomas, I see that you deleted the inner part of Pritchard Hall. I can clearly see the inner part of this building in aerial imagery, and you deleted this part from the building relation. Can you explain why you deleted this inner part from this building? Thanks.
CAM-Gerlach (2025-12-23 03:16:27+00:00): I reverted both these changesets as I can personally verify that the Pritchard courtyard and passage to it exists (having lived in the building my freshman year), and this new mapper has amassed a consistent history of edits inexplicably deleting or disrupting other buildings (including East/West AJ) in a similar fashion.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176289694
CAM-Gerlach (2025-12-23 03:24:14+00:00): As multiple mappers and myself have each reached out to this contributor multiple times on multiple of their changesets over the past month (including four days ago regarding a number of breaking changes to East/West AJ) the great majority of which have had a destructive effect (intentional or not) on the existing valid map data while not making meaningful improvements, it seems the next step has to be contacting DWG.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176281215
eggie (2025-12-22 21:10:15+00:00): Hoi Florijn..
Een motor_way...  dat zal toch niet?
Die tag haal ik even weg.
Ik pas even wat aan. .. ook dat plantsoentje waar de weg splitst.

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176281440


Groet,
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-25 03:54:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1460593895

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-12-22 21:27:28+00:00): Hoi...  Dit is oke..  
Gr eggie
Frank Peng (2025-12-23 01:38:42+00:00): What is the source for the deletion of this building passage? I'm guessing this building passage through Pritchard Hall is still there.
CAM-Gerlach (2025-12-23 03:16:28+00:00): I reverted both these changesets as I can personally verify that the Pritchard courtyard and passage to it exists (having lived in the building my freshman year), and this new mapper has amassed a consistent history of edits inexplicably deleting or disrupting other buildings (including East/West AJ) in a similar fashion.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176289694
CAM-Gerlach (2025-12-23 03:24:32+00:00): As multiple mappers and myself have each reached out to this contributor multiple times on multiple of their changesets over the past month (including four days ago regarding a number of breaking changes to East/West AJ) the great majority of which have had a destructive effect (intentional or not) on the existing valid map data while not making meaningful improvements, it seems the next step has to be contacting DWG.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176282025
Frank Peng (2025-12-24 09:41:55+00:00): Looks like the DWG is taking care of this now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19203
CAM-Gerlach (2025-12-24 21:47:14+00:00): Yup, saw that too yesterday after I reached out to them and flagged this the night before. Hopefully its an opportunity for reflection and making the most of the resources out there to learn and grow as a community contributor and a mapper.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176282025
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:52:24+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13372768543 v2

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Beauty supply store in Georgetown TX"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 17:53:28+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176713270
pyspam (2025-12-22 21:13:17+00:00): Ich habe leider aus versehen eine falsche Beschreibung von Changeset angegeben. Park + Kita wurde überarbeitet. Source: Ortskenntnis und Hamburg DK5 (HH LGV DK5 2025)
Gonéo (2025-12-23 09:37:40+00:00): Bonjour, la page Facebook du coiffeur donne le même numéro de téléphone mais avec un 06 au début. Êtes-vous sûr du 07 ?
Phil2604 (2025-12-23 13:05:33+00:00): Bonjour,
Bien vu c’est une coquille de frappe que je viens de corriger. 
Merci de votre vigilance bienveillante.
HellMap (2025-12-30 11:24:32+00:00): Hello,

As mentioned before, please do not retag areas into farmyards unless that's what they actually are. You are not just adding, but mass-converting residential areas to farmyards. Farmyards on OSM have a specific meaning and not what you are mapping. Please read what https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=farmyard says. You are creating incorrect map data making it look like Latvia is covered with farmyards when in reality most of these locations do not engage in any farming or livestock keeping.
Tramparam Parampampam (2026-01-02 10:53:46+00:00): Here was a mess in Aluksne pagasts, i've tried to fix it. And yes, it is farmyards, not a living areas, read documentation by yourself. I don't touching anything inside cities.
aceman444 (2026-01-19 23:35:30+00:00): Dakujem, ako plocha mozno OK, ale pesia zona to nie je (nie su tam take znacky). Co bolo nespravne na footway ?
Preco bolo treba odstranit chodnicky ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056987372 a potom ich znovu nakreslit ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1460603325 ale uz so stratenou znackou 'fixme' ?
Cesty ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1300105405 su indoor=yes, takze nie su tunelom.
Zabudli ste skratit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1300105404, aby bola uz len vovnutri budovy po vychod.
A znovu zbytocne odstranene schody https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1460603326 a nahradene https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1460603326 so stratou znaciek. To iste aj na druhych schodoch.
Stlpiky ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13171982912 teraz stratili akukolvek funkciu, kedze plocha je okolo nich a teda navigacia pusti akekolvek vozidlo do tejto pesej zony a obide stlpiky.
Aha vlastne tam nepusti nikoho ani chodcov, kedze ste plochu odpojili od chodnika https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/211711091. Esteze zo zapadnej strany ste na to nezabudli (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1460603324).
To, ze pesia zona na mnohych miestach zasahuje do budovy lebo ste do nej nezahrnuli vsetky body budov, ktore kopiruje (napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/766632513), to uz je najmensi problem.
Illio (2026-01-20 11:50:53+00:00): Čo sa týka pešej zóny, podľa OSM wiki "A highway=pedestrian is a road or area designated mainly or exclusively for pedestrians." a zároveň "The tag highway=footway is used for mapping minor pathways which are used mainly or exclusively by pedestrians.", takže toto územie je highway=pedestrian. Neviem o tom, že by to tak musela definovať dopravná značka.

Chodníčky som zrejme vymazal omylom.

Tie schody som vymazal zámerne, lebo boli nesprávne zakreslené a počet schodov sa tu nedá definovať.

Čo sa týka ostatných vecí, mohol som narobiť chyby, tak vďaka, že ste sa na to pozreli.
aceman444 (2026-04-13 11:06:31+00:00): Cize vlastne podla popisu medzi footway a pedestrian nie je ziadny rozdiel. Z tejto citacie nemozete tvrdit, ze toto je jasne pedestrian.

Podla mna na pesiu zonu niekedy mozu aj vozidla, ktore su tam povolene (co je aj na wiki). Na chodnik vacsinou nie. Toto uzemie by to mohlo splnat, ale Vy ziadny taky dovod neuvadzate.

Akoby sa pocet schodov nedal definovat? Pretoze sa plynule stracaju a pocet schodov sa zmensuje? Ale na konkretnom mieste kde boli schody zakreslene, urcite je aj konkretny pocet schodov.

Ano pozrel som sa a cakam kedy to poopravujete. Lebo sucasny stav je uplny blud.
aceman444 (2026-04-13 11:08:37+00:00): Sam to nazyvate pesou zonou, ale taka znacka tam nie je. Mozme sa bavit preco to je pedestrian v zmysle OSM, ked uvediete jasny dovod.

Ale to je ten najmensi problem tychto zmien.
Illio (2026-04-13 15:00:15+00:00): Čo sa týka pešej zóny, podľa OSM wiki "A highway=pedestrian is a road or area designated mainly or exclusively for pedestrians." a zároveň "The tag highway=footway is used for mapping minor pathways which are used mainly or exclusively by pedestrians.", takže toto územie je highway=pedestrian.

Neviem o tom, že by to tak musela definovať dopravná značka a nerozumiem vášmu ľpeniu na dopravných značkách. Mapujeme realitu, nie dopravné značky.

Tie schody teda vymažem a pokúsim sa opraviť aj ďalšie veci, na ktoré ste poukázali.
Sandal man (2025-12-23 14:38:44+00:00): Hi Isn't building=roof not beter for the parking from the Carrefour?
Đuro Jiří (2025-12-23 19:29:57+00:00): Improving is building=carport, but I have a habit of always mapping buildings only building=yes, habit.:)
Sandal man (2025-12-23 21:35:48+00:00): Here you change this week a roof into  a carport ;-)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/916031011
Đuro Jiří (2025-12-24 17:16:27+00:00): With StreetComplete (SCEE to be precise). I explained myself poorly, I always map buildings with Vespucci as building=yes and with StreetComplete I add more detail.

I'll be back there in a few weeks, on my way back from vacation, and after that I'll also turn these buildings into building=carports. :) If someone doesn't do it first, someone else will. By the way, there are several charging stations under construction there. I should add those too.
Đuro Jiří (2026-01-29 19:01:17+00:00): For this reason I prefer to just add building=yes:)
https://api.panoramax.xyz/?s=fm;s2;pc1bbac00-cac4-4e0e-9965-b70ffd2d08b9;c258.19/5.55/30;m19.2/38.5358337/-0.1765493;vt
Taya_S (2025-12-23 08:24:29+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071
grzegorz75jan (2025-12-27 21:23:37+00:00): Coś mi się zdaje, że poprzednik zostawił w prezencie częściowo nazwę opisową. Na swojej stronie w nazwie (kontakt) nie mają członu Dj na wesele.
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:52:26+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13378956749 v3

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Window and door manufacturer in Kankakee Illinois"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 17:53:28+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176713272
Rainero-repair (2026-03-31 20:43:54+00:00): Revert in changeset/180691451
wegen nicht zulässiger Quelle (Bayernatlas).
JoeG (2025-12-31 00:05:19+00:00): Hi, I intend to revert deleted fences in this one. In general I don't think driveways should be deleted either but I'll leave it to the mapper in question to comment if they feel strongly about it.
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:52:27+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13387472395 v2

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Bakery and cafe in Lansing MI"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 17:53:30+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176713273
(Deleted leftovers after several edits)
czebureks (2025-12-25 15:50:53+00:00): Cześć! Uważam, że jeżeli ma ściany i dach, to wciąż jest to budynek. "destroyed:building=*" przeznaczyłbym dla obiektów, które nie spełniają definicji z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building : "In OpenStreetMap, a building is a man-made structure with a roof, standing more or less permanently in one place. "
Kamil Kalata (2025-12-25 21:45:20+00:00): Cześć, czebureks!
Pozwól, że się z Tobą nie zgodzę. W przytoczonej przez Ciebie definicji bardziej chodzi o nieruchomość obiektu niż o składowe, z których musi się składać. Ponadto, definicja tagu destroyed:building=* jest wypełniona dla tego obiektu: jest on dalej oznaczony jako budynek, tylko została dodana informacja o zniszczeniu (poprzez przedrostek destroyed:*=*), a obecność zgliszczy nie przesądza o niestosowaniu tego tagu.
Yukiro (2025-12-25 22:10:39+00:00): "destroyed:*=* – not existing anymore because of an event other than intentional demolition" A tutaj istnieje, więc ja bym dodał jeszcze building=ruins
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-26 06:52:47+00:00): destroyed:building=
demolished:building= 

jest właśnie na rzeczy które już nie są budynkami - to nadal bym powiedział że jest tyle że mocno zniszczony

(co do własnej opinii to na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Mateusz_Konieczny/ruined_building się rozpisywałem)