piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2024-12-06 03:28:44+00:00): Again, no descritive names. I'm also not sure what exactly this is. It doesn't look like a typical running track. Can you review this contribution?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972482
eggie (2025-02-22 08:49:14+00:00): Beste Martin,

Hoe kan nu de Staalindustrieweg en een stuk Hoogendijk een fietsverbod hebben.
Het is niet altijd wat het lijkt. Er loopt onderdijks wel een fietspad, maar hier mag je gewoon fietsen.
Verstandig is het misschien niet.

Er komt zelfs een fietspad op uit.
Bovendien 'moet' je de bedrijven ook op de fiets kunnen bereiken. 

Het lijkt dan goed omdat je een parallel fietspad ziet lopen, maar dat ligt echt een eind weg.

Van de week ook de Veerse Dijk en Ringdijk in Zwijndrecht weer opengezet. Die had ook iemand op fietsverbod gezet. Een zelfde situatie.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-22 08:51:38+00:00): Vanaf dit punt ging het dan fout
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.853335/4.668076

Het is aangepast nu.
eggie (2025-02-22 09:22:53+00:00): ... en nog even doorzeuren  :) .. Er loopt daar zelfs een knooppuntwandelroute 64 65 !
Je kunt altijd even contact opnemen bij twijfel.
In de regel heb ik het goed getagd als lokale mapper. 
Groet
eggie
emvee (2025-02-22 13:22:40+00:00): Ja, Mea culpa, dat is inderdaad fout gegaan.

> Er loopt daar zelfs een knooppuntwandelroute 64 65 ! 

Vreemd, is dat soort gevallen klaagt de Josm validator zover ik weet en die check ik altijd "braaf".

Even de rest van de changeset bekeken maar geen andere fouten kunnen vinden, wel een geval waarbij voor de changeset snorfietsen/brommers niet over een G12a fietspad mochten.
eggie (2025-02-22 13:32:55+00:00): Kwam er gister toevallig langs en zag dat het niet routeerde... Het is natuurlijk altijd fietsweer, maar gisteren natuurlijk uitstekend fietsweer. 

Er zitten hier wel meer bijzonderheden in die fietspaden omdat het de grens is tussen twee gemeenten. Die zetten hun eigen bebording neer. 
Fietspad Edisonweg  bv.
Glassman (2024-12-06 22:31:53+00:00): In the future, just update the existing feature to save the history.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972540
Glassman (2024-12-06 03:37:54+00:00): We don't add personal information to OSM. I went ahead and removed the name from the house.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972572
Glassman (2024-12-06 03:39:15+00:00): again no descriptive names. Also we typically only add addresses to the house or main building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972616
Glassman (2024-12-06 03:39:39+00:00): Gardens are typically mapped as polygons.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972671
Glassman (2024-12-06 03:44:21+00:00): check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours for how to tag hours of operation and then could you update the opening_hours tag?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972683
Glassman (2024-12-07 01:31:21+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972729
Glassman (2024-12-07 01:31:34+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972729
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-06 10:20:07+00:00): Hi Russlad, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind removing several mapped trails and paths?

If a path or trail is private, it should be marked as such and not removed. Furthermore such objects can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See the following wiki pages for more information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

The best way to indicate that a path or road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable.

More details about this changeset can be found here: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=159972801

Thanks!
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-05 15:31:35+00:00): No response. Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161025110
Glassman (2024-12-06 22:50:31+00:00): School bus stops aren't really public transport platforms.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159972910
smichae (2024-12-05 21:24:15+00:00): Would the city be more appropriate as Grapevine for these two?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159973104
Cecilia Johnson (2024-12-06 16:49:18+00:00): Hi, these buildings are on DFW Airport-owned property, and DFW Airport operates as its own city limits.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159973104
Allison P (2024-12-06 19:37:47+00:00): addr:city is to be used for the postal city only. According to the USPS, the only accepted city name for 76051 is Grapevine. Please correct the tag accordingly.
RaphaelPasloin (2024-12-06 03:26:28+00:00): Hello,
I noticed that in this changeset, you removed the wikipedia=* tag. Over the past six months, I've observed that you sometimes remove this tag when adding a wikidata=* or wikimedia_commons=* tag.

The wikipedia key is utilized in various ways:
    • Overpass Turbo queries to find relevant articles, scripts to find wikipedia article in 404,
    • Mobile app users (like OsmAnd) that display the link in a mobile-friendly style or directly show the article in the paid version.
    • Mappers in JOSM benefit from quick access to the article while editing.
    • Various websites and apps consume this data to create custom maps, among other uses.

Some metrics:
    • If there is a wikidata tag on OSM, 52% of the time there is also a wikipedia tag.
    • Conversely, when there is a wikipedia tag, 91% of the time there is an associated wikidata tag.

This correlation is likely to increase as mappers continue to add this information. For example, see this MapRoulette challenge: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/49374.

Removing the wikipedia tag can lead to a loss of valuable data that is known to be correct. It would be beneficial to retain this tag to maintain data integrity.

Additionally, could you please ensure that your changeset descriptions are clear and accurate? Describing the addition of data when tags are being removed can be misleading.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.
Have a good day.
Glassman (2024-12-06 22:51:56+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159973752
SomeoneElse (2024-12-05 22:41:44+00:00): Thanks for fixing!
Glassman (2024-12-06 22:34:42+00:00): We don't use descriptive names in OSM. The tags are all that is needed unless it is formally named.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159973901
Mikey Co (2025-04-08 10:09:49+00:00): Busway might be a more strictly accurate tag, but as it doesn't render in many tiles, isn't ideal?
RedAuburn (2025-04-08 10:35:06+00:00): anything else is tagging for the renderer unfortunately - it sucks not having them rendered, but it's Carto's fault and we shouldn't map around their preferences. many other styles *do* render busways
NeisBot (2024-12-05 22:22:15+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-06 01:13:59+00:00): vandalism reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159977315
rempshaener (2024-12-06 20:47:35+00:00): Hallo,
das wäre dann ein emergency=disaster_response.
Viele Grüße
HeiligerHein112 (2024-12-07 20:56:06+00:00): Ich arbeite nur mit iD und finde diesen vorgeschlagenen Tag nicht - kannst Du helfen und entsprechend ändern? LG
rempshaener (2024-12-07 23:09:02+00:00): Hallo, kein Problem. Erledigt. Viele Grüße.
Filip009 (2024-12-07 12:10:14+00:00): Hello, are you sure, there is a sign, that this footway is a dedicated cycleway? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1135258891
El ArquiPachuca (2024-12-12 04:21:17+00:00): Hola, agradezco mucho que hayas modificado las alturas de los edificios en el tecnológico de Pachuca. Era una gran labor modificar todas las alturas de cada uno de los edificios, no se quien se las haya puesto o con que propósito pero estaban completamente erradas. Buen mapeo!!!
Romwriter (2024-12-06 18:56:52+00:00): Hallo MHD, kannst Du die Quelle (Antwort der Stadt Delmenhorst) veröffentlichen? Mir erscheint die Eintragung mit admin_level=9 widersprüchlich zu der Gliederung in Stadtbezirke und Unterbezirke mit dem vorhandenen Unterbezirk Hasbergen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17024352). Vielen Dank und Beste Grüße, Romwriter
felipeeugenio (2024-12-05 23:57:52+00:00): eliminado objeto inexistente.
AntiCompositeNumber (2025-08-23 02:47:13+00:00): Hi. I am reverting this changeset because Pease is a well-defined area with a consistent name, and therefore belongs in OpenStreetMap as a place= node. If you think a different place= value should be used, please explain why. Please note that the definitions for the various types of places in OpenStreetMap don't always match their common American English definitions. For more information, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place and the linked pages.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170857868
CurlingMan13 (2025-08-26 04:48:23+00:00): Please ensure you are using the correct tags for temporary closures if you so choose to map them:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction#:~:text=Don%27t%20use%20construction%3D*%20to%20tag%20such%20short%2Dterm%20closures%2C
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-12-06 12:23:24+00:00): I have reverted this changeset because it broke a lot of administrative relations, for example whole East Timor relation was removed. Please be more careful with the relations in your future edits. 

Happy mapping
RedAuburn (2024-12-06 00:48:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4544467
Udarian (2024-12-06 03:19:10+00:00): next time you add a building please check that your not adding a duplicate, the gas station was already mapped just not tagged as a building.
RedAuburn (2024-12-06 01:24:50+00:00): from https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4496230
sw_uwu (2024-12-08 08:49:41+00:00): Hi, I reverted your changes because most of them are simply not correct. Please don't upload data that is wrong and ask in the various OSM communities for help if you arent sure about something. Im sure people are happy to help!
160048941
aceman444 (2025-05-21 21:05:40+00:00): Zdravim, tu ste asi omylom vymazali bod https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1778404543 z administrativnej hranice obce Kozarovce, co sposobilo, ze isla krizom cez Tlmace, cast Lipnik.
Opravil som, ale davajte prosim pozor a tieto objekty hranic ignorujte.
macdale (2025-05-22 14:33:57+00:00): …pri editacii v JOSM si vzdy tieto prvky vypinam, ale mohlo sa kludne stat ze som zle prepol alebo ze boli pripnute k nejakemu objektu s ktorym som hybal. Dakujem za opravu aj upozornenie.
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-06 10:10:37+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159978910
woodpeck (2024-12-06 08:39:47+00:00): Dear Ildefonso Carvalho, thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. Out of respect to other mappers, it is customary to fill the "comment" field with a human-readable description of the mapping in question, e.g. "mapped buildings in XY city" or so. Hashtags (which are aimed not at humans reading the description but at machines evaluating them) belong in the "hashtags" field, not in the comment. Thank you.
Jarek 🚲 (2024-12-06 03:03:34+00:00): Here's more detail and reasoning on the changes. Please also check the earlier discussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155375493

Use highway=pedestrian for ways that are wide, I would call them "boulevard-like", and used by both pedestrians and cyclists, and also wide enough for two-tracked vehicles, and used by the trackless train. Also for Spring Road north of Centre Road, which in practice is almost entirely pedestrian, and much more pleasant to walk on than you'd expect from a highway=service.

Use highway=cycleway with foot=yes for some other ways that are wide and comfortable to cycle on and in fact ridden on fairly frequently. (This also matches the iD preset for multi-use path)

Remove name Cherry Hill Trail from parts that are not near Cherry Hill. This name is not signed. I can believe it has some use, but surely only where there's cherries, not all the way down to Colborne Lodge Drive.
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-06 10:10:46+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159978586
felipeeugenio (2025-10-29 22:03:02+00:00): Hola. En las numeraciones por favor solo la numeración. La palabra Parcela sobra en este caso.

Gracias
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:15:24+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659495
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Hugoren Martinako (2024-12-09 21:02:13+00:00): Hallo!

I noticed the route=historic_railway you're adding are not correct. OSM should not map historic elements, and specifically, this railway now turned into a cycleway.

The relation you added, was mapped initially as this other one (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/1689868), note the tag changes that eventually became into a route=cycling (it should be a superroute, though, but that's another issue).

Gruss
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Grass-snake (2024-12-06 20:23:42+00:00): Здравствуйте, подскажите, Вы уверены что это дорога называется именно "ул. Угольная станция"? Просто по моим сведениям район называется "Угольная станция" (их три, ещё есть с номерами *-2 и *-3) и адрес относится именно к названию района.
Не могу найти источник названия именно улицы.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:15:25+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659495
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Udarian (2024-12-06 05:30:40+00:00): are you sure because in the official databases put out by Miami Dade County the address is listed as 17117 Southwest 82nd Court.
GugaRR (2024-12-06 14:14:23+00:00): Yes, and you are also correct. The House should have both addresses pointing to it. Mailbox is located at 8225 SW 171st Terrace, coherent with the 171st number progression. Power/Water also uses 8225 SW 171st Terrace
mcliquid (2024-12-06 06:40:16+00:00): Hi, nach welcher Quelle denkst du, dass die Gebäude diese Form haben?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 17:38:28+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12399107733/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 17:39:13+00:00): maybe amenity=fixme can be simply removed and it would be enough to fix it?
alan_gr (2025-03-31 18:41:47+00:00): Somehow in Everydoor I generated tags "fixme=type", "fixme:type=yes", and "amenity=fixme" - I have no idea how! I removed the 1st two soon after, but didn't notice the 3rd - I have removed it now. Thanks for pointing it out.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 20:23:51+00:00): See https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/880 - can I quote you there?
alan_gr (2025-04-01 07:25:40+00:00): Sure - I have subscribed to that thread, so no need to add further updates here.

I have had another look at Everydoor and now understand better what happened. I think there are really two issues here - the general one about amenity=fixme, and a more specific one about what happens if you change from fixme to a "real" shop type in the same edit. Maybe a more detailed description is helpful:

1. While surveying with EveryDoor I saw something that was clearly an unmapped shop, but it was closed for the night and I couldn't tell exactly what kind of shop. I searched for "shop" (maybe with shop=yes in mind) and chose "shop fixme" from the drop down list.
2. I now know that this immediately creates the 3 fixme tags (none of which refer to "shop", so the interface is a bit misleading).
3. While still editing the POI, I noticed that a website was displayed, which allowed me to identify it as a stationery shop. So I changed the shop type to stationery. 
4. I now know that this created shop=stationery but left the other 3 tags in place. I suppose I should have checked the raw tags at the time. I normally do that when changing the type of an existing POI in EveryDoor, in case there are tags that are no longer relevant to the new type. But in this case I was still in the process of creating the new POI so I didn't think of it.
5. Reviewing my own changes at home I spotted the fixme tag and removed it. I easily noticed the fixme:type tag also, as it is close to fixme in alphabetical order. But I simply never noticed the amenity tag. As I had not tagged any kind of amenity at any point, and was not aware of Everydoor using amenity=fixme on other POIs, it was not something I had in mind. 
6. Once that was done, there was nothing to attract my attention to the amenity=fixme tag, even though I look at POIs in this area quite frequently. So it stayed that way until you mentioned it.
RedAuburn (2024-12-06 04:55:49+00:00): src website
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-06 15:03:15+00:00): Did a little research and got the rest of the stripmall mapped out, though I'm pretty sure my information is out of date, but it should be in a state where the StreetComplete app on mobile devices will ask for details.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159980678
MiggityMac (2024-12-06 15:07:58+00:00): Thank you! Sounds great. There are a few spaces still under construction in that area. Chickasha, OK is going through many additions at the moment.
citrula (2024-12-06 13:03:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions. leisure=park has a specific meaning in OSM which doesn't necessarily match with how we use it in the US. I encourage you to read this section on the wiki to get an idea why leisure=park is not appropriate for state parks like this.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park#Mapping_history_in_the_USA

Let me know if you have any questions!
❤️‍🔥 (2024-12-06 08:43:16+00:00): Hi, please don't ignore validator warnings. And may I ask why you deleted part of the defence area?
mapnerd🤓 (2025-01-13 06:57:38+00:00): Thanks for your comment, I deleted the part of the defence area as it is clearly on residential land unless you can prove that it is some how defence land.
❤️‍🔥 (2025-01-13 09:45:24+00:00): hey, you can check https://data.linz.govt.nz/layer/50772 to see the exact extent of the 'Defence Purpose' land
mapnerd🤓 (2025-01-19 13:47:58+00:00): Awesome sauce, I wasnt aware of that, tysm
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-08 03:13:07+00:00): What source was used?
Cricri93160 (2024-12-08 07:26:21+00:00): Sur ortho express 2024 on voie que toute la rue a été modifier avec des rond point depuis 2023, et puis ji passe souvent et il y a bien 2 rond point sur cette rue
Pieter Vander Vennet (2025-05-07 09:23:07+00:00): Hi,

You have added a few facebook-pages here under the 'panoramax'-tag - it seems like this was a mistake?
End0fLine (2025-05-07 12:39:05+00:00): Oh absolutely. Give me a bit and I'll get that updated.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2025-05-07 12:44:43+00:00): Great!
nevw (2024-12-07 04:33:50+00:00): Hi, please draw waterways in the direction of flow, always downhill to eventually flow in to streams and river to meet the sea.
HolgerJeromin (2025-04-27 07:39:04+00:00): Das ist ja nett, dass du hier vor 5 Monaten "fehlende" Gebäude eingetragen hast, aber die wurden vor ein paar Jahren abgerissen.
Dies ist auch auf aktuellen Luftbildern schon zu sehen....
HolgerJeromin (2025-04-27 08:13:11+00:00): Das Hallenbad wird in ein paar Tagen eröffnet. Das hab ich gerade mal eingetragen.
wies1 (2025-04-27 09:38:27+00:00): Hallo,
ich bin damals nach Alkis gegangen:

https://osm.zz.de/dbview/?db=alkisdiff&layer=buildingnotinosm#51.88382,8.50513,18z

Deswegen hatte ich es eingezeichnet gehabt. 

Dies nur zur Erläuterung

Ich verstehe dich so, dass du es korrigiert hast inzwischen, so dass jetzt alles in Ordnung ist.

Gruss

wies1
wies1 (2025-04-27 09:40:29+00:00): Hallo,
weil du Luftbild ansprichst. Woran kann man sehen, von wann das Luftbild ist?
Gruss
wies1
Samokat (2024-12-08 13:30:40+00:00): @qRick, привет.
Внёс правки в доступность дорог в ЖК Парадный ансамбль. Ранее отметил их как "Private", я убрал этот тег в пакете правок: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160056917

По полученной мной информации, проехать в ЖК возможно. Если у тебя есть информация по шлагбаумам, воротам, то их стоит добавить с тегом: "permissive".

Т.к. отметка дорог и ворот тегом "private" не даёт корректно построить маршрут до/из/в самом ЖК. 
(Если, конечно, это действительно не закрытая частная территория, на которую невозможно зайти или что-то доставить)
eggie (2024-12-06 10:43:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community