piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-12-13 21:54:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Advertising agency in Chandigarh"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 17:13:53+00:00): 🔴 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by https://osm.org/changeset/176015845
joost schouppe (2026-01-05 14:10:27+00:00): Zou het kunnen dat het collateral damage is dat het shoppingcenter als POI hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55194544 verdwenen is?
Jvitegem (2026-01-05 16:13:50+00:00): Ja dat lijkt er wel op.
Waarschijnlijk mis gegaan bij het importeren van de nieuwe geometrie
Is hersteld
joost schouppe (2026-01-06 18:57:01+00:00): Merci!
chiararik (2025-12-10 14:10:07+00:00): admin_centre:postal_code	39100 instead of administrativ boundaries led to errors
wildmaps (2025-12-10 16:07:29+00:00): Hi chiararik,
why does that lead to errors?
Colbertson (2025-12-01 12:47:38+00:00): Please check the data before adding duplicates. Also names shouldnt be descriptive, theres no need for "name=kindergarten" if it has "amenity=kindergarden".
HellMap (2025-12-01 14:07:23+00:00): Hello,

I have reverted your changeset because it added too many duplicates to the live map data with incorrect values. I kept/restored the nodes that appear to be new elements.

I'm not sure how you are surveying these locations, but please make sure your map is up to date and verify what the EveryDoor map actually shows when you are visiting the location so that you don't add duplicate objects for things that are already mapped. If you want to add names or properties to something already mapped, you will need to select and edit existing objects, not create new ones.
rskedgell (2026-01-06 00:43:37+00:00): Adding access=permit here would imply that all transport modes, including pedestrians need a permit, routinely granted to everyone requesting it.

It's both a very car-centric way of tagging a modal filter and very unlikely to be correct.
World_Winner (2026-01-10 08:32:26+00:00): Hi rskedgell,
Based on parallel communications involving rajdhani and Chris Pankhurst in similar context, we are addressing these issues collectively at the moment. Your comments on car-centric edits are well noted, thank you very much for giving your valuable time and experience in communicating these. I will do my best to adopt this perspective in my future edits.
rskedgell (2026-01-13 14:02:20+00:00): Hi @World_Winner

I visited Lindsell Street yesterday and made some initial edits with StreetComplete and SCEE. I also took some pictures which should be available on Mapillary soon.

On Lindsell Street to the SE of its junction with Plumbridge Street, there is a modal filter with two planters, removable bollard (locked) and "motor vehicles prohibited" signs (TSRGD diagram 619).

As I believe the council's own service vehicles are allowed to pass this point, I have tagged the bollard ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13344338810 ) with motor_vehicle=private rather than the motor_vehicle=no implied by the sign.

It would help if the current traffic order were available in The Gazette, but I can only find the experimental orders which preceded it and which have now expired. I suspect that the Westcome Society's website refers to a proposed change, but I'm not sure whether their website is a compatible source for OSM without explicit permission (which TomTom may well have, but I do not). 

There is also something of an oddity on Lindsell Street to the E of the modal filter. There are old "weak bridge" signs with a 17 tonne (actual) weight limit. The bridge itself isn't obvious as the railway cutting for the former Greenwich Park branch line was filled in almost 100 years ago. This can be seen on old and out-of-copyright OS maps, e.g. https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/side-by-side/#zoom=19.7&lat=51.47332&lon=-0.01384&layers=168&right=osm
World_Winner (2026-01-16 08:10:54+00:00): Hi @rskedgell,

Thank you very much for taking the time to visit the location in person for a detailed on-the-ground survey, and thank you very much for sharing it with me as I now understand the setting much better. 

We consider public information such as the Westcombe Society website, as supporting references to confirm the user feedback we receive, but not as a single or a main source. Meaning, we don’t go forward with the edit if the feedback and the public boards have conflicting information. 

Many thanks again for the engagement and your efforts to ensure a higher quality in my edits. Contributions like yours are always valuable to ensure map accurately reflects on-the-ground conditions, and also to ensure I develop to be a more experienced contributor.
Frans S (2025-12-01 13:24:44+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please check this footage on how to map 

See this video.
For buildings with a few floors, start watching from 1 minute.
K12230LF (2025-12-01 11:23:58+00:00): Bonjour Eurelien,
Pour information, j'ai mis à jour : healthcare:speciality=dieteticienne en healthcare:speciality=nutrition comme on peut le lire sur le wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:healthcare#Sous-%C3%A9tiquettes
K12230LF (2025-12-01 11:25:00+00:00): J'ai également supprimé les points dans le numéro de téléphone

A bientôt :)
user_23381312 (2025-12-01 12:02:08+00:00): merci beaucoup
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-01 14:17:40+00:00): Your business is already on the map; please consider updating that object before adding duplicates. Please be aware advertising copy is inappropriate in OSM.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175360436
NeisBot (2025-12-13 21:54:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Electronic device repair service"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-13 21:59:47+00:00): Thanks for reverting, Baloo
streckenkundler (2025-12-01 18:06:16+00:00): Hallo Anne,

du hast hier um review_requested gebeten. Dem komme ich gerne nach. 
Ich hab auch schon am Tage gesehen warum...
Nun, so wie du das gemacht hast, geht das nicht mit den Wanderwegen... 
Zum einem muß ein Objekt als Relation angelegt werden und dann müssen alle beteiligten Wegesegmente darin aufgenommen werden. Ich hab das mal im CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175369835 gemacht.

Die Wanderwegsrelation selbst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19906514. Ich habe auch alles übernommen, was du gesetzt hattest. Das roundtrip=yes  dagt aus, daß es Rundweg ist. Alle Wegesegmente im Bereich des ways, den du eingebaut hattest, habe ich in diese Relation eingefügt. Das heißt im Zweifelsfal aber auch, das Straßen/ Wege hier gesplittet werden müssen.
Das du hier mit iD werkelst, kann ich technisch aber nicht helfen, ich arbeite von Anfang an mit JOSM.

Noch eine Frage. Ist der Weg mit einem Symbol markiert? Wenn ja, welches? Die Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Wanderweg-Symbole gibt einen kleinen Überblick... Da gibt es noch mehr Seiten...

Zu mindestens https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=16.0/52.0107/14.5003 zeigt nach meiner Bearbeitung die Route an.

Wenn du weitere Fragen hast, immer her damit... 

Grüße aus dem Spreewald,

Sven
Anne am See (2025-12-01 18:39:55+00:00): Hallo Sven, danke für deine Unterstützung und Bearbeitung der Tour. Grüße aus dem Schlaubetal in den Spreewald
eggie (2025-12-01 11:22:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
j o h o (2025-12-01 16:36:21+00:00): Bedankt!
eggie (2025-12-01 11:26:50+00:00): De landuse heb ik aangepast naar een doorlopende polygoon en niet meer een los stuk 'inner' multipolygoon.

MVG
eggie
mappinglander (2025-12-02 20:42:49+00:00): Merhaba, lütfen OpenStreetMap'e deneme amaçlı yol, alan vb. eklemeyiniz. Düzenlemeniz geri alındı.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-06 21:50:10+00:00): Please seehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19120
eggie (2025-12-01 11:37:12+00:00): Dag joho,

Je heb een naam toegevoegd aan de bebouwde kom
landuse=residential.. Met welk doel?
Wanneer de wijk zo heet dan hoort er eigenlijk een placenode.
Wat bedoel je hier met Gondel?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-01 11:39:20+00:00): name=Gondel verwijderd.
De wijk heet Bolder.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-01 11:41:07+00:00): De basisschool staat nu twee keer in de database van OSM.
De adresnode lijkt me voldoende.

MVG
eggie
j o h o (2025-12-01 16:49:38+00:00): Dag eggie,
Bedankt voor de moeite die je neemt om alle wijzigingen langs te gaan. Ik reageer in een keer op je vragen.

De naam stond al bij de note en is idd niet nodig bij naam.
Met Gondel bedoel ik de wijk/het deel van de stad/de verzameling straten.
De formele wijk kan inderdaad Bolder heten, maar in de 18 jaar die ik in de stad heb gewoond heb ik nog nooit van de naam Bolder gehoord. Mensen verwijzen naar de straten Gondel xx met de naam Gondel. Op dezelfde manier heeft de kaart een naam Schouw, Hanzepark, Jol, Galjoen, Punter enz hoewel zij formeel ook geen wijken zijn.

Eenmaal is genoeg natuurlijk.

Mvg,
Joho
eggie (2025-12-01 16:56:58+00:00): Oke...    We kennen ook naast quarter wijken het begrip buurten. Die kunnen dan weer onderdeel zijn van een wijk.
Ik zag dat een ervaren mapper al eerder de naam verwijderd had van de landuse=residential.
Die hoort eigenlijk niet de buurtnaam te bevatten.
Ik zie dat de buurtnamen hier al zijn aangebracht met lace=neighbourhood
Dat is al sinds 2019 het geval.
Beetje in en uitzoomen dan zie je die naam wel verschijnen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=neighbourhood

Maar goed... de buurtnaam staat al op de kaart.
Mapse,
eggie
NeisBot (2025-12-13 21:54:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Bar in Long Island City"

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-13 22:41:29+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175395296
Szymson (2025-12-01 19:20:49+00:00): Skrupulatnie, 2 kursy co niedziela, ale i taki wariant musi być xD
stasiu512 (2025-12-01 20:19:14+00:00): Tak, masz racje, ciężko mi w niektórych sytuacjach było określić czy dany wariant jest sensownie mapować jeśli jest rzadki więc zacząłem mapować wszystkie tak jak w całym MZKZG. Co innego w PKS Gdynia gdzie się trochę poddałem bo każdy kurs to był inny wariant;d
Jednak tu w MZKZG przyjmuję zasade wszystkich wariantów ze względu na jasne komunikaty o zmianach. Muszę stwierdzić że jednak ZKM Gdynia ma najlepsze rozkłady dla mapowiczów, nie trzeba nic szukać od razu wszystkie warianty podane na talerzu po wybraniu linii:)
eggie (2025-12-01 11:46:26+00:00): Beste Dit lijkt me allemaal niet coorect. Iets beschrijven doe je niet met name=  Dus geen name=schoolplein
De amenity=school hoort eenmalig te worden getagd op het terrein of op de adresnode of evt op het gebouw. Het staat nu 3x op de kaart.

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2025-12-01 11:56:12+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (3 changesets) shows that 487 of your last 500 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23516965
Antplanproje (2025-12-02 11:16:02+00:00): hello
I am working as an urban planner on the Alanya–Antalya motorway project. The route shown on OpenStreetMap reflects an old alignment and gives users incorrect information. Based on this outdated route, some users are submitting objections, claiming that the motorway passes through their parcels. To provide accurate information to the public, the outdated and incorrect route has been removed from the maps. The finalized alignment will be added to OpenStreetMap separately.

In addition, is there an easy way to upload the route from KML to OSM directly? When it is drawn manually, it often results in errors.
thank you for your help
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-12-07 07:26:08+00:00): @Antplanproje. Merhaba. KML dosyaları doğrudan OpenStreetMap'e yüklenemiyor. Ancak bazı araçlar vasıtasıyla KML dosyalarını OSM editörlerinde açıp düzenleyerek yüklemek mümkün. OpenStretMap'e toplu bir şekilde veri ekleme konusunun ayrıntıları için OSM Viki'sine bakabilirsiniz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import

Viki sayfasında da göreceğiniz üzere toplu şekilde veri yükleme konusunun mutlaka topluluk ile görüşülmesi öneriliyor. OSM Türkiye topluluğuna yazarsanız topluluktaki gönüllüler de sizi bilgilendirecektir. 

OSM Türkiye Telegram grubu: https://t.me/osm_tr

OSM forumu Türkiye sayfası: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/tr/118

OSM Türkiye eposta grubu: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tr

İyi günler.
Antplanproje (2025-12-07 18:27:02+00:00): teşekkürler telegram üzerinden talepte bulundum,
coatix (2025-12-01 15:35:35+00:00): Gibt es den nicht mehr?
xf_ (2025-12-01 17:00:17+00:00): Wurde im Frühjahr abmontiert
coatix (2025-12-01 17:29:59+00:00): Danke für die Info!
eggie (2025-12-01 12:03:06+00:00): Dag joho..

Probeer eens te reageren op opmerkingen.
Gebruik de adresnode svp om op bij te taggen

MVG
eggie
j o h o (2025-12-01 16:53:07+00:00): Dag eggie,

Ik zie deze berichten pas nu, aangezien ik nu pas mijn mail controleerde. Ook onhandig dat ik ze niet in mijn profiel kan zien overigens. 

mvg
Joho
eggie (2025-12-01 16:58:53+00:00): Best lastig te doorgronden in het begin.
De commentaren op de changesets komen in je reguliere mail.
De brichten via PB's komen in je editor binnen.
Maar je hebt het door :)

Mapse
eggie
j numminen (2026-03-08 08:33:39+00:00): Hi, this changeset changed some highways in the Keilaniemi area into highways under construction. No construction is happening currently though, so I made the necessary changes.
Pontiac_CZ (2025-12-05 17:48:18+00:00): Ahoj, už jsem Ti to psal do soukromé zprávy, nicméně ještě oficiálně - 
nástupiště https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1455131933 je bohužel nesprávně vytvořeno, takové v Otrokovicích neexistuje. Bylo to nejspíš podle fotomapy a určitě v dobré víře, ale přece jen Ti mohlo být podezřelé, že jsi ho nakreslil v místech, kde parkují auta. Existující nástupiště v Otrokovicích jsou již dlouho a správně zmapována.
eggie (2025-12-01 12:10:26+00:00): Beste Joho  Je gaat in hoog tempo door maar kijkt nauwelijks of iets wel goed is gegaan?

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175354516

De landuse heb ik weer hersteld.
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway
Ook hersteld
MVG
eggie
j o h o (2025-12-01 16:57:33+00:00): Beste eggie,
Ik was een aantal locaties waar ik wel eens kwam aan het bekijken op missende onderdelen, zo ook deze atletiekbaan. 
Ik was in de veronderstelling dat de waarschuwingsmeldingen waren verholpen.
Dank voor de alertheid

mvg,
Joho
eggie (2025-12-01 17:01:45+00:00): No problem...  OSM kent wel een heel steile leercurve. Er wordt je niet kwalijk genomen.
Editor JOSM heeft een betere foutenanalyse en ook beter overzicht.
Een aanrader. editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047


Veel plezier met mappen.
Hedaja (2026-07-05 22:22:53+00:00): Hi 
ich bin auf zwei Abbiegerelationen von dir gestoßen, weil eine defekt war.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19904506
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19904505

Darf man dort wirklich mit dem Fahrrad nicht die Bachgasse weiter fahren und muss auf den Parkplatz abbgiegen. Bzw muss vom Parkplatz aus links abbiegen.

Wenn es nur für Autos gilt, braucht es die Relationen glaube ich nicht, da Kraftfahrzeuge sowieso nur die service Straße langfahren dürfen und die Abbiegebeschränkung damit impliziert ist.

Grüße
Christian
is-zUser (2026-07-06 09:25:28+00:00): Hallo Christian, danke für den Hinweis. Ich hatte jetzt versucht, Ordnung rein zu bringen in die Abbiegebeschränkungen. Am Abzweig zur Bachbrücke Richtung Sachsenstraße steht wohl kein Schild, aber an der Abbiegung zum Parkplatz stehen Schilder. Ich war nur 1x im Winter dort, kann also nicht mal schnell nachsehen. Wenn du möchtest, kannst du die Relationen auch entfernen. VG Torsten
Gabriel44200 (2025-12-03 20:57:01+00:00): Esa pasarela non vai estar ata o 2030, eu poríaa como proposed

https://www.laopinioncoruna.es/coruna/2025/11/14/apertura-pasarela-acceso-coches-intermodal-123734118.html
真中あお (2025-12-31 17:37:29+00:00): Thank you for your contributions to OSM. However, please note that Lenin's Mausoleum is already marked as an area on the map, so it should not be marked as a point again.
感谢您为OSM作出贡献。不过请注意，列宁墓已经作为一块区域标记在地图上，因此不应当再标新的点了。
NeisBot (2025-12-13 21:54:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Boat tour operator in Key West Florida"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-13 22:40:55+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175391345
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-03 23:24:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1195200907/history - na tym odcinku plac budowy jest zaznaczony to budowa chyba też?
maraf24 (2025-12-04 11:57:11+00:00): Niemożliwe. Na pewno nie ma budowy żadnej drogi w ciągu DK8.
maraf24 (2025-12-04 12:33:29+00:00): Jeśli chodziło o to, dlaczego nie ma w ogóle highway=construction na obszarze budowy, to nie ma gdyż:
- wycofana została całość, bez wydzielania niewielkiej części poprawnej (nie muszę tego robić przy tak dużej błędnej edycji)
- mi się dotychczas nie chciało na tym obszarze robić tych linii
- inni edytujący - był chyba tylko jeden, @voltairovicz - i on też nie zrobił tych  linii
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-04 17:10:54+00:00): > Na pewno nie ma budowy żadnej drogi w ciągu DK8. 

a S8 na odcinku gdzie jest landuse=construction zmapowane ?
maraf24 (2025-12-04 19:44:44+00:00): Jeśli ktoś chce, to sobie może te drogi tam oznaczyć jako construction, mi to nie przeszkadza.
Ja uważam, że lepiej to zrobić później, gdy jakiś kształt przyszłych dróg zaczyna być widoczny w terenie. Wiem, że większość tej opinii nie podziela:)
Chris Fleming (2025-12-06 21:07:05+00:00): Just having a quick look at this, edit looks grat.
JakovBušić (2025-12-03 16:54:24+00:00): The road has been split and the hgv restriction was removed from parts of the road for which there are no signs in changest <175455246>
JakovBušić (2025-12-04 06:45:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175455246
ElliottPlack (2026-01-09 17:38:09+00:00): Thanks for capturing this. did you happen to notice the end of the street is a turning circle? please add those when you see them.
subham_lyft (2026-01-13 03:59:43+00:00): Hi ElliottPlack,
My name is Shubham, and I’m Amit’s teammate. We are mappers on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you very much for your feedback. Based on Lyft-owned aerial imagery from November 2025 (linked here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DiRJPUjhOy1DAyHJkPVwDLK0isg5sfU-/view?usp=sharing), which we used for our edits, there is no circularized surface at the end of Villabrook Way. In line with the OSM wiki guidance (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_circle), I therefore did not add a turning circle tag to the node. But I understand that the functionality may be exactly the same as for typical turning circles.
 I hope this clarifies my edits, and thank you for your contribution to OSM.

Happy Mapping!
Thanks,
Shubham
Chris Fleming (2025-12-07 22:17:15+00:00): Hi, this is tagged as 

leisure=fitness_centre 
sport=boxing

I think the more normal way of doing this is to use leisure=sports_centre as well as sport = 

(see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dsports_centre )
Tatfahren (2025-12-01 14:55:09+00:00): Den hab ich wohl irgendwie unwissentlich hinzugefügt, ohne es zu merken.
RobotFK (2025-12-01 15:14:13+00:00): Kein Problem, ist mir auch nur aufgrund der Telefonnummer aufgefallen
Mathias_ADAV (2025-12-02 13:02:41+00:00): Bonjour, au vu des 2 photo, c'est en double sens mais uniquement pour les automobilistes autorisé https://api.panoramax.xyz/?s=fp;s2;p482b03d4-ba1f-43a8-b7b8-1fd153916b75;c347.00/0.00/30;m17/50.523411/2.632131;vt  https://api.panoramax.xyz/?s=fp;s2;p2ac06789-c0ab-4e15-a08a-ac9b78025b54;c65.00/0.00/17;m22.74/50.52461944/2.62998611;vt
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-01 13:11:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1455141310

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
czebureks (2025-12-01 14:00:28+00:00): Cześć! Jeżeli w budynku szkoły mieści się klub taekwondo, to należy dodać go jako punkt - w części budynku, w której się znajduje. Zakładam, że chodzi o salę gimnastyczną?
Frans S (2025-12-14 13:13:25+00:00): Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such as roads and paths.



Keep on mapping!
cuzi (2025-12-04 20:26:33+00:00): Hi, wurde das Gebäude abgerissen oder hast du das "building"-tag unabsichtlich gelöscht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/561971334
ernstludes (2025-12-05 09:18:12+00:00): Ja, Gebäude existiert nicht mehr. Da ist jetzt ein Parkplatz
Jarek 🚲 (2025-12-17 15:39:53+00:00): Hello,

Generally the usual way of tagging GO stations is that we have a node (or an area) representing the entire station, with station metadata like codes (e.g. ref:go_transit=LA), and then the station/ticket building can be separate and tagged just building=train_station. In this change, you made the station building the station, and deleted the station node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/88576501/history/8, losing the station codes and the consistency with other stations. Is there a particular reason?
Waaslander (2025-12-01 13:13:16+00:00): Thanks! :)
PulisakZ (2025-12-01 15:40:02+00:00): No problem. Glad to help.
luschi (2026-02-04 11:23:54+00:00): Ciao wildmaps,       
Atzwang ha il codice postale 39040.
Dove hai preso l'informazione che ora viene utilizzato questo codice postale?
wildmaps (2026-02-05 21:05:19+00:00): Hoi, Danke fürn Hinweis, weil Atwang zur Gemeinde Ritten keart obo a ondre Postleitzohl hot isch do a Fehler giwesn. Sollte jetzt passn: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178157791 Danke