piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Dimitar155 (2026-07-03 07:42:41+00:00): Здравей и благодаря за промените!

Почти всички бизнеси си пишат имената само с главни букви, защото така са решили. Сигурно за да се вижда от далече. При нас е малко по-различно, понеже като неписано правило, пишем имената така че да не са изцяло с главни букви. Единствените изключения са абревиатури (училища, детски градини, други учреждения и някои банки) и Икея, но последните имат само един магазин в България :).

Коментара ми е конкретно за name и brand таговете. Към operator и owner нямам претенции, тъй като така са се регистрирали в Търговския регистър.

Поздрави,
Митко
Kaloan-koko (2026-07-24 11:28:58+00:00): Здравей, от една страна съм съгласен. От друга има обекти, където пък си личи разликата в използвания размер на буквите. В тези случаи съм запазвал изписването на магазина, освен когато е някакъв brand, който по сайта си и т. н.  си държи на друго изписване. От друга страна има и случаи, когато с главни букви е изписано основното име, а с малки (или capital case) допълнителна част към името, която при нас е безсмислена, защото съвпада с вида магазин (примерно може с малки букви да пише "ресторант") - в такива случаи съм оставял все пак с големи букви името на заведението. Също има някои обекти, които на няколко места по витрината си са изписали имаето си с главни букви, та и тези съм ги оставял с главни букви. В крайна сметка, вида  изписване не зная дали може да създаде объркване при търсене, със сигурност не и при попадане на обекта в полизрението при търсене на картата, пък ако и си говорят хората за някакъв магазин биха се разбрали, без значение как някой си е решил да си изписва името на магазина - при произнесената реч няма главни и малки букви :) 
Накратко, въвеждал съм ги по този начин за придържане към стилизацията, избрана от управителя или там който ще да е на търговския обект.
Dimitar155 (2026-07-24 14:52:18+00:00): Това което на мен ми бърка в здравето е че накрая в рамките на една сграда има обекти с имена само с главни букви и с смесени.

Например виж как седи "OCHILAS" спрямо съседните обекти до него.

Тези дни имаше и дискусия по тази тема. Четейки по диагонала, повечето хора променят капитализацията. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/capitalization-ortography/145568
Fraxi (2026-07-24 15:00:57+00:00): Или da BONO :X 
В крайна сметка, има ли стандарти, правила в OSM в естетически аспект? Е, нали OSM е просто една база данни, а?
Kaloan-koko (2026-07-25 06:02:57+00:00): Така за съжаление достигаме до друга евентуална разлика - в София много имена на заведения са английски, а някои и италиански, а сигурно тук-таме и на други езици. В българската езикова норма с начална главна буква се пише първата фъма от името, а другите - само ако са съществителни собствени. На английски - думи след първата започват с главна буква, стига да не са предлог или 'the'. За италиански как стоят нещата - никаква представа. 
Така ако решим да ползваме единен формат за капитализация на имената, ще нарушим все някоя от езиковите норми :/
Dimitar155 (2026-07-25 11:53:04+00:00): "da Bono" :)

Не сме безгрешни, не може да не нарушим някоя езикова норма. Все пак такива обекта не са толкова чести и не мисля че е особен проблем. Ако някой италианец го види и не му хареса, винаги може да го промени.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-02 22:56:56+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20899
Nakaner-repair (2026-07-02 08:15:22+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 184603813, 184605435, 184607458, 184615164, 184655276, 184664051, 184748693, 184768137, 184791666, 184806307, 184810244, 184815222, 184819780, 184929333, 184929605, 184929885.
ticki_52 (2026-07-08 12:46:38+00:00): @nakaner @silverserver83 und @jengelh
Auf dem Parkplatz Lohfeldener Rüssel waren vor meiner Korrektur vom 22.06.26 sämtliche highway=service‑Wege zusätzlich mit service=parking_aisle getaggt. Dieses Tagging ist ausschließlich für interne Fahrgassen zwischen Stellreihen vorgesehen. Auf Zufahrten und Erschließungswegen ist es fachlich falsch und führt dazu, dass die Fläche routingtechnisch nicht zuverlässig erreichbar ist. Ich habe deshalb das fehlerhafte Tagging entfernt, um die Erreichbarkeit wiederherzustellen.

Seit dem 27.04.2026 ist auf der Fläche zudem eine neue LKW‑Ladestation (Milence, vier Plätze) gemappt. Auch diese war durch das flächendeckende parking_aisle‑Tagging nicht korrekt erreichbar. Das Wiederherstellen des fehlerhaften Zustands durch den Revert verschlechtert somit die Datenqualität und beeinträchtigt die Nutzbarkeit der Infrastruktur.

Der Umgang mit service=parking_aisle sollte auf dem gesamten Rüssel‑Gelände überprüft werden. Das gleiche Muster findet sich auch an anderen Stellen, etwa am Autohof Kassel Ost. Eine Korrektur des Taggings wäre sinnvoll, um die Erreichbarkeit der jeweiligen Einrichtungen sicherzustellen und die Datenqualität konsistent zu halten.

ticki_52
trial (2026-07-08 17:15:07+00:00): @ticky_52, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1496768995#map=20/51.2718366/9.5265332&layers=SD war mit service=parking_aisle richtig. Was verstehst du nicht im Wiki? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle
Die 3 U sind eben nicht "Hauptfahrwege auf einem Parkplatz, also Zufahrten oder Verbindungswege zwischen Fahrgassen werden ausschließlich mit highway=service gekennzeichnet."
ticki_52 (2026-07-16 09:49:20+00:00): Ich möchte zu diesem Revert eine sachliche Klarstellung geben.

Ein wesentlicher Punkt der Diskussionen in Kassel betraf das Parkplatz‑Mapping. Meine Änderungen basierten auf dem Wissensstand, den ich vor 3–4 Jahren aus dem Wiki und der gängigen Praxis kannte. Die Definition von service=parking_aisle im Wiki ist weiterhin unverändert und beschreibt Fahrgassen zwischen Stellplatzreihen.

In Kassel scheint sich zwischenzeitlich eine andere lokale Vorgehensweise etabliert zu haben, die jedoch weder im Wiki dokumentiert noch in Changeset‑Diskussionen oder Community‑Kanälen kommuniziert wurde. Die daraus entstandene Diskrepanz war ursächlich für die Missverständnisse.

Leider erhielt ich im Vorfeld keinen Hinweis darauf, dass hier eine abweichende lokale Praxis angewendet wird. Meine Änderungen waren nach offizieller Wiki‑Definition korrekt und nicht vandalistisch.

Der vorliegende Revert umfasst 16 meiner Changesets aus verschiedenen Regionen (u. a. Deggingen, Gruibingen, Kassel), die inhaltlich nichts miteinander zu tun haben. Eine pauschale Rücksetzung aller Änderungen eines Mappers ohne technische Einzelbegründung ist ungewöhnlich und aus meiner Sicht nicht angemessen.

Ich dokumentiere dies hier, damit die Hintergründe nachvollziehbar bleiben und keine falschen Eindrücke über meine Arbeit entstehen. Inhaltlich bin ich weiterhin bereit, sachlich über Tagging‑Fragen zu sprechen.
Sébastien Pi (2026-07-02 18:28:00+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue,

Il ne faut pas supprimer les nœuds mais plutôt préfixer disused:shop (ou shop=vacant, les deux façons peuvent se faire).
En supprimant, nous perdons l’historique.
Sébastien Pi (2026-07-02 18:30:49+00:00): revert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184993100
Sébastien Pi (2026-07-02 18:33:14+00:00): Fermeture : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184993196
C’est plutôt cela qu’il fallait faire.

N’hésitez pas à consulter le wiki ou à demander avant en créant une note si vous n’êtes pas sûr.

Bonne journée !
eggie (2026-07-02 16:48:22+00:00): Dag HBt,

Op de Ficarystraat lijkt fietsroute 59-94 stuk je zijn. 
Eigenlijk kun je met iD geen routerelatie bewerken. Dan kan alleen met editor JOSM.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-02 16:53:11+00:00): Fietsroute hersteld
eggie (2026-07-03 06:53:41+00:00): Wellicht nog kijken naar de access=...  toegang.
Mogen hier wel motorvoertuigen rijden.
Het staat nu opnen voor regulier verkeer.

MVG
eggie
ajmat (2026-07-03 06:43:11+00:00): Revert of https://osmcha.org/changesets/184898304
maro21 (2026-07-12 22:56:46+00:00): A czy budowa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1296475398 jest już zakończona? Bo ostatnie sprawdzenie wskazuje datę 2024-03, a budowa miała się zakończyć w grudniu 2024.
maraf24 (2026-07-26 11:04:42+00:00): Budynek tak, ale teren wokół to był jeszcze plac budowy.
Fraxi (2026-07-02 12:51:13+00:00): Благодаря, щях да отварям бележката и да повдигам въпрос за това място. Не знам защо съм сложил звездичка за стойност, ако не е било автоматично от JOSM нещо...
habi (2026-07-02 08:29:25+00:00): Sorry, da war in JOSM noch ein Detail drin, das ich wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5368372 angeschaut habe, deshalb ist das Changeset so gross.
Diesen Teil im Tessin habe ich in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184961395 revertiert.
Trafford_Mapper (2026-07-02 20:14:56+00:00): Hi; 

I've done a minor amendment to your 'World Way' edit, as it's just blocked by cones currently (Has been for quite a while now) and I agree due a map update now. However it's not officially permanently closed, nor is it confirmed it's closed for good. I've amended the tags from 'disused:highway=' to 'access=no' as I feel that's a better match to how it is currently working on the ground and better reflects that it's still present and only blocked by cones currently, pending any further developments/reopening from MAG
Loshu (2026-07-03 08:06:09+00:00): 👍
SomeoneElse (2026-07-03 11:23:24+00:00): Hello ParadoXXXXXX,
please use better changeset comments than just "日常" ("daily").
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2026-07-03 11:23:52+00:00): 你好 ParadoXXXXXX，
请在变更集（changeset）中填写比“日常”更有意义的注释。
祝好，
Andy
LordGarySugar (2026-07-07 00:37:19+00:00): Hi, it would be best if terraced houses were drawn as individual houses rather than merged together like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1534504530. It's quite hard for streetcomplete users to add addresses when buildings aren't split. If you are going to add a whole terrace as one building, please use building=terrace to distinguish it from a single terraced house. Thanks!
Nickinkent (2026-07-07 11:30:33+00:00): Thank LordGarySugar, I will get round to doing that yet but that is what I plan to do and have done in the streets around the highlighted. The thing is that it takes a long time to enter houses individually and find the numbers of house etc. therefore, they are large areas of blank that show no houses. These re are for me to get back to latter.

Thanks for the advice, it is headed.
Nick
eggie (2026-07-02 16:43:37+00:00): De landuse zou je als apart vlak kunnen toevoegen.

MVG
eggie
yelisey90 (2026-07-21 22:52:30+00:00): reverted - the road exists, why shouldn't it?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186145066
Marvk (2026-07-02 16:29:21+00:00): Hallo Oliver und willkommen auf OSM!

Sieht für mich gut aus!

Beste Grüße
Marv
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184962780
Frans S (2026-07-03 14:57:46+00:00): Thank you for contributing to this project. Please remember to align the buildings by pressing the letter Q or right-clicking with the mouse.


The images may distort the buildings, but 99 per cent of them have 90-degree angles and are symmetrical and orthogonal. Satellite images are oblique, NOT vertical.


Please enable the ‘ISSUES’ option in the right-hand panel of your editor so that any errors, if there are any, are displayed.


We suggest adding multiple buildings per changeset and NOT naming the buildings unless they have a real name.


Take care not to allow buildings to overlap with each other or with other elements already mapped, such as roads. If an overlap occurs and a warning appears on the warning icon (triangle) in the iD editor, do not select the option “mark this as top/bottom”; instead, choose “ignore this issue” and move the building you are mapping to ensure it does not overlap with the other object.


Buildings must not share nodes with each other or with other features. If this happens accidentally, you can use the ‘Disconnect’ option (the ‘D’ key) in the iD editor to separate the nodes (shared nodes appear grey instead of white). To prevent this from happening, hold down the ALT key whilst placing a node near another building; this will stop the nodes from automatically joining together.


Best regards, and keep mapping.
yelisey90 (2026-07-21 22:59:29+00:00): reverted - these roads do not lead to any residential buildings or to any service buildings, so by definition they are tracks

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186145293
LordGarySugar (2026-07-04 22:15:37+00:00): Hi, thanks for your changes in the local area. If you are importing building footprints from mapwithai, please make sure that semidetached and terraced houses are split along their property boundaries rather than being merged together like this. You can enable the OSMUK cadastral parcels overlay to help do this. If you have any questions, feel free to ask, thanks.
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-04 19:19:25+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185107389
OSM_RogerWilco (2026-07-02 10:11:19+00:00): Why?
World_Winner (2026-07-09 05:39:35+00:00): Hello  RogerWilco,

Thank you for your question.

The digitization direction was changed as part of updating the lane information and aligning the road geometry with the available source data. There was no intention to alter the actual traffic direction or other road characteristics.

Changing the digitization direction did not affect existing data, but I understand that it might be deemed unnecessary. I can be more careful to preserve the original direction in future edits in the area, if you think it should stay that way. 

Thanks again for your inquiry. Happy to align with your thoughts.
Yunan973 (2026-07-10 15:23:18+00:00): Bonjour,

les piles de pont utilisent l'attribut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bridge:support%3Dpier

J'ai corrigé.

Cordialement
Vincent @ (2026-07-13 08:44:11+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre aide. La problématique pour moi était de modifier la relation court d'eau Théols, pour exclure le pilier et joindre les seuils ajoutés le long de la pile. J'ai trouvé une solution. Est la bonne façon de faire ? Pour révision. Encore merci.

Ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184964142#map=19/46.949573/1.985484
Yunan973 (2026-07-18 21:19:15+00:00): Non, la bonne façon de faire était celle là : créer un chemin (sans attribut) englobant toute la zone qui doit être exclue de la rivière (c'est-à-dire avec le rôle inner), à savoir la pile et la zone boisée, cf. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1537228080.
Pour les seuils, cela fonctionne comme les falaises = un seul trait le long de la crête en faisant attention au sens du chemin pour que les petits triangles, qui représentent les pointes de flèches, soient dans le sens de l’écoulement de l'eau.
Celui en haut (à droite dans le cas présent) est ok, celui qui est en bas (celui de gauche dans le cas présent) n'est pas nécessaire car il n'y a qu'un seuil. Une autre solution aurait été de créer une surface fermée, cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dweir#As_an_area
tux67 (2026-07-02 10:06:54+00:00): This is no longer a church as such and not linked to a religion. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Kamillus_(M%C3%B6nchengladbach)
I would suggest some more research before doing remote changes?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184964360
norgis (2026-07-21 14:12:00+00:00): Why do you keep deleting highway=bus_stop despite the Norwegian community guidelines, and despite getting feedback on several changesets (as well as a block for exactly this reason)? Please stop deleting highway=bus_stop in Norway!
Sammyhawkrad (2026-07-02 10:34:59+00:00): Hi, consider dealing with warnings before you save. The road you added crosses buildings, which from current imagery, no longer exist.
pavithrasivakumar (2026-07-03 03:12:41+00:00): Hii Sammyhawkrad,
Thanks for the feedback. I sincerely apologize for my mistake. I accidentally created the service road by connecting it to a waterway segment. While editing, I mistook the existing segment because of its appearance and the one-way direction arrows on the map, and I failed to verify the underlying tags before making the edit.
I have now reverted the edits. I truly appreciate your feedback, and I'll be much more careful in the future by thoroughly checking feature tags and connections before uploading any edits
Thanks,
Pavithra
Sébastien Pi (2026-07-03 10:18:06+00:00): revert https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185031462
Marvk (2026-07-02 16:24:37+00:00): Hallo Paus-Wes und willkommen auf OSM!

Der Edit sieht in Ordnung aus, lediglich building=industrial hätte ich ggf. auf building=retail geändert.

Und was ist mit deinen Öffnungszeiten? Wenn du möchtest, dass diese auch in OSM vermerkt sind, kannst du das tag opening_hours wieder setzen, mit dem Wert

Tu-Fr 10:00-19:00; Sa 09:30-15:00; PH off

unter der Annahme, dass an Feiertagen geschlossen ist.

Beste Grüße
Marv
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-29 05:20:19+00:00): DWG revert - fix incorrect tagging from undiscussed import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186562153
Sammyhawkrad (2026-07-02 10:45:10+00:00): The road you added here is connected to a waterway
Enock4seth (2026-07-02 10:55:42+00:00): I don't think you are being paid to make useless contributions to OpenStreetMap. If you are not sure of what you are doing please don't upload to OSM.
B Sai Deepthi (2026-07-02 12:02:55+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. I sincerely apologize for my mistake. I accidentally created the service road by connecting it to a waterway segment. While editing, I mistook the existing segment because of its appearance and the one-way direction arrows on the map, and I failed to verify the underlying tags before making the edit.
I have now corrected the issue and confirmed that the road is properly connected.  I truly appreciate your feedback, and I'll be much more careful in the future by thoroughly checking feature tags and connections before uploading any edits
Thanks,
B Sai Deepthi
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-29 05:54:48+00:00): DWG revert - fix incorrect tagging from undiscussed import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186563332
MappingMore (2026-07-05 04:48:06+00:00): Partially Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184917460
BCNorwich (2026-07-04 06:33:10+00:00): Way: Mehsi - Saray Rd (1534525299) removed, duplication
BCNorwich (2026-07-04 06:35:42+00:00): Way: Mehsi - Saray Rd (1534525300) duplication removed
Tomas Straupis (2026-07-02 16:48:27+00:00): Nėra paplūdimyje jokio tako, išimsiu
Yunan973 (2026-07-03 13:24:49+00:00): Bonjour,

lors de ton travail, tu as cassé plein d'itinéraires. J'en ai corrigé quelques uns mais je coince sur celui là : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3527702#map=18/44.055114/5.051565

Cordialement
Numa_ (2026-07-04 09:48:17+00:00): Merci pour ta vigilance ! Je corrige ca rapidement.
Marvk (2026-07-02 16:17:53+00:00): Hi Tom_4711 und willkommen auf OSM!

Sieht für mich plausibel aus. Meiner Meinung nach passen die Tags 👍

Beste Grüße
Marv
yelisey90 (2026-07-21 23:06:02+00:00): You have disconnected the roads from the overall road network. That can't be true; please fix that
luisforte (2026-07-02 14:15:44+00:00): Olá
Provavelmente por engano, terás eliminado a restrição de sentido unico (oneway=yes)  aos 8 acessos às duas rotundas!

( ways 159540139, 159540143  159540156, 159540160, 182703632, 182703635, 186394946 e 186394947)
DANDO MOTORAZOS (2026-07-02 16:15:14+00:00): Subsanado. Disculpas.
NyngYun (2026-07-14 18:13:11+00:00): bus station is still exists, name is "市五中", and it shouldn't be deleted. It should be restored and renamed to correct name
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-14 18:26:10+00:00): No. It was already mapped and is still exist: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11247677053

This changeset removed a duplicate created by a user of the Organic Maps app.
NyngYun (2026-07-16 08:49:19+00:00): Oh ok i'm sorry
DwarfNebula_ (2026-07-02 11:11:39+00:00): Hi, bedankt voor de bijdrage. Mag ik vragen waarom je de adresgegevens hebt verwijderd?
NickvZelm (2026-07-02 12:09:29+00:00): Hoi! Ik zie het nu pas inderdaad, dat was niet de bedoeling. Ik heb ze zelf niet verwijderd, misschien dat dat gegaan is als je een adrestype wijzigt? Ze staan inmiddels in ieder geval weer terug. Bedankt voor je oplettendheid!
DwarfNebula_ (2026-07-03 10:38:55+00:00): Ik heb een issue aangemaakt, gezien dit ook met fietsenstallingen gebeurd. Weet jij nog welke preset je had geselecteerd voor renewi?
https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/issues/2416
DwarfNebula_ (2026-07-03 10:39:06+00:00): En bedankt voor het terugzetten trouwens :)
NickvZelm (2026-07-03 14:54:34+00:00): Geen probleem! Ik heb voor type gewoon gezocht op "renewi" waarna daar de type naar voren kwam.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-06 10:30:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2837395497/history - what it is ? Office? Recycling center? Bunch of containers?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-06 10:31:18+00:00): (maybe NSI is broken if they offer solely unspecific amenity=recycling entry ? )
mueschel (2026-07-21 13:31:16+00:00): Hi,
what does 'ludotheque' mean? Maybe
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtoy_library
?
Grand-Annecy (2026-07-21 14:37:39+00:00): Hi,
You're right ! 'Ludotheque' means toy_library. I didn't know this tag.

I think, It's still a community_centre with a toy_library.
Hard to tag ..

Here is the website of the place :
https://www.animationdulaudon.org/
mueschel (2026-07-21 14:54:17+00:00): 'toy_library=yes' on some other POI is also already used in some places:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/toy_library

If it's a larger part of the centre, you can think about adding another POI inside the centre.
Grand-Annecy (2026-07-22 06:54:38+00:00): I have modified it to toy_library=yes thanks
BCNorwich (2026-07-04 06:30:27+00:00): Way: Saraiya - Mehsi Rd (1534525297) removed, duplicated existing highway.
BCNorwich (2026-07-04 06:21:22+00:00): Way: 1534540402 it duplicated existing highways.
Gaung Tebono (2026-07-02 11:31:10+00:00): The clear point is that it is not based on the classification that the government made.
Gaung Tebono (2026-07-02 11:32:45+00:00): For the Ngawi urban area, it is better to use a classification one level higher than the classification of roads outside the Ngawi urban area, here the Ngawi urban area is the Ngawi district which is the capital of Ngawi regency
Gaung Tebono (2026-07-02 11:40:09+00:00): Edit wars are not allowed to occur. It's better to just discuss it because actually this problem hasn't found a bright spot yet.
Leo Slager (2026-07-05 11:05:41+00:00): De schade van onoordeelkundig wijzigen van wegen heeft een omvangrijke schade toegebracht aan de routerelaties van de bus lijnen.

Het heeft mij meer dan 1 1/2 uur gekost om dat allemaal weer te repareren.

Junction=circulair is in NL zeer zeldzaam. Je kunt er van uitgaan dat dat ni NL niet voorkomt, belave bij 2 grote uitzonderingen.
Het is duas altijd junction=roudabout.
En dan zonder oneway=yes  !!

Please do not make this kind of changes in the Netherland.
Ask an experienced NL mappr to do that. That is better als making so many mistakes.

kind regards
Leo
MaksimDanilau (2026-07-06 07:29:45+00:00): Hi! Thanks for the feedback and corrections. I apologize that you had to make corrections, and I will definitely take your comments into account in the future. 
Best regards, Maksim
eggie (2026-07-02 15:33:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback   Je hebt denk ik  je bankje aan een administratieve grens geplakt. Ik zal het losmaken. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
ggs290 (2026-07-02 11:47:45+00:00): El comentario debería haber ido en #184814466
Gaung Tebono (2026-07-02 12:09:19+00:00): The bright spot has been determined, but the bright spot still relies on government decisions.
eggie (2026-07-02 15:35:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-02 15:36:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community