piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2026-06-21 15:44:00+00:00): Can you explain why this is being changed to highway=pedestian when imagery shows cars in driveways next to the alley?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184368110
Glassman (2026-06-21 15:53:20+00:00): I went ahead and changed it back to an alley. Please let me know why you believe it should be a pedestian way.
Jyn Pat (2026-07-12 21:27:27+00:00): Hello Glassman, thank you for your comment and I apologize for my late response. After reviewing OpenStreetMap's "Guidelines for pedestrian navigation" at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Guidelines_for_pedestrian_navigation#Pedestrian_ways_and_shared_ways under "Pedestrian ways and shared ways" the suggestion for conditions "where pedestrians have priority and can walk on the full width of the way" it suggests, among others, highway=pedestrian. This alley is primarily used by local residents for pedestrian use where the whole width is used for walking as there is no sidewalk or shoulder, for local access to garages be vehicles in those garages and for public utilities such as garbage collection. It is not intended for commercial traffic such as delivery vehicles, ride-shares, large commercial vehicles, or general traffic. However, the previous categorization appears to encourage routing through this alley even when there is zero traffic present on either parallel roads nearby. Is there a better classification that discourages routing of commercial traffic through a local alley that is primarily in use by pedestrians and government services?
Glassman (2026-07-12 21:44:02+00:00): I'm very familiar with that area. I used to live on Meridian in a condo by Gas Works Park. 

The way is basically an alley with no signage preventing vehicles from using it.  A pedestrian way would likely have some feature to prevent cars from using as well as signage.

FYI - look at the wiki you referenced for pedestrian highways. It should be a polygon (area), not a way. A good example of a pedestrian area is Red Square on UW.  Unfortunately, we don't have any good routers that can route through a pedestrian way. Valhalla router has a Google Summer of Code project to add area routing. I can't wait.
Jyn Pat (2026-07-13 02:09:50+00:00): Given your familiarity with the area, how would you recommend categorizing an alleyway to discourage routing of vehicles? Does highway=service make more sense? Or should the alleyway be marked as not connecting to 41st St, which is the approach google maps took?
Jyn Pat (2026-07-13 02:11:59+00:00): Checking, apple maps does not show the alley at all- is this a better approach? The current categorization leads to unfortunate issues like commercial vehicles damaging property as they find themselves 3/4th of the way down, blocked by a narrow way and very difficult to back out.
grzegorz75jan (2026-06-24 01:02:23+00:00): Tak patrzę na podkłady orto,  cieniowania, BDOT i coś mi tu nie pasuje ogólnie z tą rzeczką https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531094415 pod kątem przepustów oraz na ile to rzeczka a na ile to rów https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp_2.html?locale=pl&gui=new&sessionID=6C300814-08E8-46E6-BCA9-0CAAFC0141C8
grzegorz75jan (2026-06-24 01:14:06+00:00): Choć BDOT10k pokazuje już jakiś ciek wodny https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp_2.html?locale=pl&gui=new&sessionID=5F4AC8A1-DE68-406F-817A-F0FD23021228

Dyskusyjny pozostaje przebieg tego cieku, przepustów przez trójkąt dróg.
uprkos (2026-07-03 21:11:39+00:00): Łaziłem tam przy okazji wizyty na cmentarzu wojennym i próbowałem ustalić przebieg cieków, części niewidoczne (podziemne lub bardzo zarośnięte) poprowadziłem wg tego co wydało mi się najbardziej logiczne w kontekście fragmentów widocznych na miejscu i ISOK. Jak najbardziej możliwe, że nie wszystko jest idealnie. W każdym razie przed edycją na pewno cieki były niepoprawne, podobnie zresztą jak cmentarz, który był zmapowany w innym miejscu.

Czy jest to rzeczka czy rów - też trudno powiedzieć, bo byłem tam akurat w czasie ulewnych deszczy, więc wody było sporo, ale mogło to być zjawisko okresowe. Generalnie jednak strumyk bardziej niż rzeczka.

Musiałbym się tam wybrać jesienią, gdy roślinności będzie mniej. Najpierw w kolejce mam jednak fortalicję w Breniu, o której kiedyś pisaliśmy. Gdy ostatnio miałem tam jechać, śnieg był do pasa...
grzegorz75jan (2026-07-05 10:21:00+00:00): Parę cmentarzy też miałem okazję przenieść w właściwe miejsce choć nie zawsze udało się ustalić właściwy obrys.

Co do ogólnie cieków wodnych to faktycznie ciężko czasem ustalić czy to rów czy ... rzeczka i w którym miejscu co jest czym.

Te "okopy szwedzkie" i parę innych rzeczy u mnie poszły do "archiwum" bo niem mam już czasu, siły a szkoda bo sporo dzwoniłem, zdobyłem kolejne numery.
To wypadkowa efektu "malarzy"
nakładów czasu, często nie wiadomo jak ... sklasyfikować obiekt a kontakty często na początku pełne entuzjazmu a po kolejnym telefonie czuć już opór.

Wracając do tematu to z swojej strony popatrzyłem na podkłady i trochę się to nie jakby kleiło z edycją. Nawet gdybym był jak Ty na miejscu to pewnie też bym się pogubił bo tak jak piszesz zarośnięte, wyschnięte i pewnie pośpiech i inne sprawy na głowie.
Matija Nalis (2026-06-20 21:20:47+00:00): ops, wrong comment, fixing notes in Croatia generally
Matija Nalis (2026-06-20 21:21:02+00:00): ops, wrong comment, fixing notes in Croatia generally
❤️‍🔥 (2026-06-23 10:16:41+00:00): thanks for all your edits! appreciate you going back and fixing those earlier ones :) perfect use of bridge:name=* here
Matija Nalis (2026-06-20 21:21:07+00:00): ops, wrong comment, fixing notes in Croatia generally
Rodrigo Rega (2026-06-21 01:07:51+00:00): Hola.

Los dos negocios que habías añadido ya existían en el mapa. He procedido a añadir la información de teléfonos y horarios de apertura a los ya existentes y borré los que habías añadido. Por favor, revisa la existencia antes de añadir nueva información al mapa. Un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184369227
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-23 06:20:26+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the added name real?
Mjmcc521 (2026-06-21 01:18:49+00:00): Since you are so smart, why does my driveway still have the label Sparta Road? My driveway is not Sparta Road.  Sparta Road is the Road that is labeled Williams Street. You know so much so fix it. The next driver who says their GPS brought them through my driveway I will have arrested and they can contact you.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-21 09:00:39+00:00): You are likely looking at an old map with data from before your own earlier changesets, as I didn't touch either of those changes--you may need to hard-reload your browser (press reload while holding the Shift key on desktop, or long-press it on a phone). Way 13591221 https://www.osm.org/way/13591221 has a name=* of Sparta Road , exactly as you named it, and Way 13591221 https://osm.org/way/13591221 is your driveway that was recreated by another mapper, which has no name=* and that I've tagged access=private for you. Using OSMCha makes it easier to see what exactly I've changed https://osmcha.org/changesets/184370058 . If you are using a third party map or app that uses OSM data, they may take some time to update with your changes (anywhere from days to years depending on the service).

Please keep in mind that we are community volunteers, spending our free time to help you here. As mentioned, someone else had already recreated your driveway afresh, and in this changeset I merely added the access=private and private=residential tags (as well as refining the geometry and other tags to accurately reflect the situation), which explicitly communicates exactly what you are asking for--that the driveway is strictly private for use only by the resident (you).  This will be reflected on maps by showing the driveway grayed out and with special markings to indicate it is private (if it is shown at all), and by navigation apps by not routing the user over it, once they are updated with your and my changes here.
ChanFry (2026-06-21 19:03:45+00:00): I should have said "Mohawk Drive" (instead of "Road"). Regardless, there is no road or drive or street of any kind in this location.
PL 2188677 (2026-06-21 00:35:24+00:00): Under article  of Decreto-Lei 230/91, of Portugal, these space belongs to the private domain of the portuguese state - EPAL. It is called a "conduta adutora" (EPAL). To preserve the quality of the water, people must not use these roads. Private roads.
PL 2188677 (2026-06-21 00:36:03+00:00): article 14 and others of  Decreto-Lei 230/91
ftrebien (2026-06-25 20:48:07+00:00): Qual o sentido de usar track nesta via?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531107654

Sua função é dar acesso a uma lavoura ou a uma floresta?
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-01 19:25:23+00:00): Thanks for adding this, I wonder if you know the area code for the phone number here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13954655785
a-sav (2026-07-01 20:18:44+00:00): I am not from there, so not sure. maybe someone local could advise? Here is what Google AI says: The area code for Barrow-in-Furness in the UK is 01229.If you are calling a landline in this town from outside the UK, you will dial +44 1229 and then drop the first zero of the local number.
I am not sure this information is useable if it's from ai.
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-02 05:09:00+00:00): Thanks, I found a suitable source and have updated it now
Seyruun (2026-06-21 01:14:52+00:00): Ahhh die Box ist zu riesig!
aleph_null (2026-06-21 01:41:32+00:00): There must have been an old leftover bit in NZ, sorry about that. I had actually reset Rapid, but it evidently didn't work properly between browser reloads. The edits should all be correct, though (and they are only in the two corners, not in between).
Fidelis Assis (2026-06-30 19:39:54+00:00): Boa tarde, GabiruX_. Este changeset deixou a relação do distrito de Itaguaí, em Itaguaí-RJ, quebrada. O limite não está fechado.

Pode corrigir ou reverter as alterações?
Fidelis Assis (2026-06-30 19:34:03+00:00): Olá,  GabiruX_. Esta edição  deixou a relação de Ilha da Madeira quebrada:
- O limite não está fechado;
- O membro w747772357 está sem papel na relação;
- O membro w826000180 está duplicado.

E. mais importante, "Ilha da Madeira não é um distrito de Itaguaí-RJ, mas um bairro.

Pode corrigir?
Solaris07 (2026-06-22 09:37:58+00:00): Hi, the buildings that were added in South Grafton are severely offset and also appear to be inaccurate. Was this an import from MSBF (Microsoft Building Footprints)?
Iahaia Amisse (2026-06-22 11:25:57+00:00): Hi, Solaris07
Yes, I mapped it using AI. however, make sure you're using Bing Imagery as a base to check the alignment.
Solaris07 (2026-06-22 11:44:21+00:00): MSBF has been known to be unreliable for Australian applications - and there are problems with the import itself, such as buildings on top of roads (on account of the Bing imagery being badly offset from the real locations of buildings)
Iahaia Amisse (2026-06-22 11:59:05+00:00): Thank you for the feedback.
But what is the recommended image source so I can make the corrections?
Solaris07 (2026-06-22 12:10:06+00:00): Unfortunately, you generally have to draw buildings manually in Australia.
Solaris07 (2026-06-22 12:13:18+00:00): I've reverted the import - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184429344.
arafqus (2026-06-23 18:15:04+00:00): Hi, I hope this finds you well. I would like to know how you came into the conclusion of downgrading the classification of these segments of RN 16  between the stream bridge right after the intersection with CW 56 and right up to the intersection with RN 21 when they fit the criteria to be classified as motorways (as they were previously tagged), one of the most important and easily identifiable qualifications are 2X2 ways with additional emergency lanes on both ways on the right side, which are paved and found in the segments mentionned above.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-21 05:41:30+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186096731
arafqus (2026-06-23 18:13:01+00:00): Hi, I hope this finds you well. I would like to know how you came into the conclusion of downgrading the classification of these segments of RN 16 between Annaba and El Hadjar when they fit the criteria to be classified as motorways (as they were previously tagged), one of the most important and easily identifiable qualifications are 2X2 ways with additional emergency lanes on both ways on the right side, which are paved and found in the segments mentionned above.
rajdhani (2026-06-23 04:15:12+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184457448
kingkingHK (2026-06-21 03:38:58+00:00): Is it really a drinking water?
Angus Lee (2026-06-21 04:20:14+00:00): Yes it can be cross checked on https://waterforfree.org/fountain/126113/
kingkingHK (2026-06-21 05:25:14+00:00): Your link points to a community centre of some sort that is equipped with a drinking water, not a drinking water named "地海深居（土木工程處社區聯絡中心）"
Kovoschiz (2026-06-21 18:04:38+00:00): To be blunt, the problem is you shouldn't add such a `name=` to the `=drinking_water`
Kovoschiz (2026-06-21 18:06:09+00:00): Or you shouldn't use `=drinking_water` for the feature of this `name=`
Kovoschiz (2026-06-21 18:07:43+00:00): 2. And don't use brackets in `name=` which is for proper names only. Use `description:zh=`
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 08:38:43+00:00): You can keep re-adding your SEO spam and nonsensical tags, but they will keep being reverted unless and until they conform to all OSM standards, conventions and best practices.

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184420931

https://osm.org/changeset/184420931
felipeeugenio (2026-06-21 15:16:51+00:00): Hola.
Algunos comentarios a sus ediciones:
1) por favor cuadrar edificios con la letra Q. Se nota que están hechos a mano los que agrega
2) por favor no agrupar edificios. entendemos que una estructura puede ser una facultad, pero en varios de los que agrega es evidente que son uno o varios edificios y tienen varios segmententos con distintas alturas. Entonces no es cosa de dibujar un polígono que cubra todo, como si fuera una unidad homogenea y decir que se llama de una manera y tiene tales atributos.
Quizas a ese punto es mejor agregar un nodo con las propiedades y dibujar los varios edificios con detalle por separado.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184373194
felipeeugenio (2026-06-21 15:19:35+00:00): Uno de los edificios agregados es un perfecto rectángulo y le agregó un secmento semi circular. Por favor más cuidado
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184373194
jjoo (2026-06-21 15:44:46+00:00): Hola
1) Ok
2) Tu comentario tiene problemas de redacción, por lo que no lo entiendo. Sin embargo, por lo que se puede entender, dices que "agrupo" edificios, lo cual no es cierto: cada unidad arquitectónica que trato de colocar es una; trabajo ahí y conozco muy bien el campus. 

Saludos
felipeeugenio (2026-06-21 15:57:59+00:00): Hola. Entendió bien. Al tener alturas distintas, ya se considera una unidad distinta en OSM y debe ser dibujada por separado (building:part). Le puso 4 pisos a toda una estructura, la que claramente tiene segmentos que son de más o de menos de 4 pisos.

El conocer el lugar no implica saber mapear bien dichos lugares. Estamos para ayudarlo, no se preocupe. Esto no es grave. Ya arreglé parcialmente las ediciones dentro de la universidad.

Saludos
eggie (2026-06-21 05:49:48+00:00): Dag Davy.

Je hebt van een heidegebied een park gemaakr. Dat lijkt me niet correct.
..park is een functie met meestal een naam.
Mvg,
eggie
DavyS32 (2026-06-21 06:33:58+00:00): Hallo, hartelijk dank voor je bericht. Deze aanpassing moet per ongeluk gebeurd zijn en is zonet ongedaan gemaakt. Fijne dag. D.
eggie (2026-06-21 06:43:56+00:00): Davy.. Ik heb nog even de heide in een multipolygoon gezet als inner anders zie je bos en heide door elkaar.
Ik zal je ons onze welkomstmail sturen per PB.

CTRL-F5 voor versneld effect.. of geduld kan ook. 
MVG
eggie
smichae (2026-06-21 02:22:16+00:00): Thanks for the addition!
Pentium20 (2026-06-21 03:45:01+00:00): @smichae No problem!
Taksine (2026-07-13 07:49:38+00:00): 你好，你的编辑问题不小，需要注意一下
Wildsharky (2026-06-23 08:53:31+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:184458237
Wildsharky (2026-06-23 09:10:03+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184458237
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184373978
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 08:42:03+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising hype in description=* and malformed tags/values in changeset 184421103

https://osm.org/changeset/184421103
caprieldeluca (2026-06-21 12:48:12+00:00): Hola. Quedaron addr: en highway, en Estrada.
Los nombres no van todo en mayúsculas.
Telegram: osm_ar.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184376401
smichae (2026-06-21 14:31:49+00:00): Thanks for the additions!
rajdhani (2026-06-22 10:58:24+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:184426671
eggie (2026-06-21 07:53:49+00:00): Dag Joep,

Tip.. Probeer bij te taggen op dr bestaande adresnode.
Je adres is nu niet compleet.
Ook geen spatie in postcode svp.
Mvg
eggie
joeposaurus (2026-06-21 08:00:43+00:00): Bedankt, eggie, zal het onthouden voor de volgende keer! Of kan/moet ik dit zelf aanpassen?
eggie (2026-06-21 08:04:18+00:00): Hoi.. Je zou het zelf kunnen aanpassen.
CoMaps is geen ideale editor hebben we gemerkt. Lastig om een adresnode te selecteren.
Mapse,
eggie
joeposaurus (2026-06-21 08:36:41+00:00): Heb twee changesets ingediend met een request for review: 184380121 (verwijderen deze change) en
184380052 (tag op correcte adres). Hoop dat ik het daarme opgelost heb.
madmaximux (2026-06-21 06:59:05+00:00): *Updated roundabout and a couple traffic islands. Based on local knowledge and aerial imagery.
mapl (2026-06-25 17:36:34+00:00): Hi osm-club!
Thanks for adding the mail address. I have noticed that you are using the same changeset comment message in many of your changesets. It would help me if it stated something like "added email address" instead. Also there is a typo: nichtclub->nightclub in the message. But thanks for your edit!
KimChinhTri (2026-06-21 07:10:45+00:00): additional source: https://5.pik.vn/6f2d2c7d7c087195cc11c69747eaff7385fc4635a47908b938d30b5d92c5b1df.webp

updated the border of Binh Tri Dong and Binh Hung Hoa wards: https://binhhunghoa.gov.vn/tin-tuc/to-chuc-lay-y-kien-cu-tri-ve-de-an-sap-xep-to-chuc-lai-khu-pho
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18fzJbWGwL/
Dimitar155 (2026-06-21 08:34:21+00:00): Здравей и благодаря за промените!

Билярда на НДК го бях отбелязал на ниво -1, тъй като оттам му е входа. Действителност, основното помещение е на ниво -2, но там няма обособен външен вход. Може би е по-добро да бъде отбелязан с level=-1;-2

Поздрави,
Митко
Kaloan-koko (2026-06-22 18:10:37+00:00): Здравей, @Dimitar155

Всъщност казусът в момента е още по-голям. До преди няколко месеца от входа на -1 се слизаше по стълби в помещение с джаги (които бяха/са към Stix), това заведение се падаше отдясно, а отляво имаше нещо като бар+дансинг (редовно пишеше за някакви вечери на латино танците). В момента обаче Stix са придобили и второто помещение, където има още маси+бар.
Това значи ли, че трябва да добавим още един node? Питам, защото вече попадам на поне трети такъв случай (на разширил се магазин). Какво се прави, ако преди това е имало node за другия магазин, трябваше да се затрие ли?

За текущия случай се чудя дали има смисъл да сложим един entrance с level=-1, а Stix-а да остане на level=-2. Съгласен съм и с твоето оформление.

Поздрави,
Калоян
Dimitar155 (2026-06-22 19:15:29+00:00): Формално погледнато самия бизнес се намира на ниво -2. На -1 няма какво да прави човек. Това което мен ме притеснява е че ако бъде само с level=-2, при обикаляне на терен и сложен филтър за ниво -1, няма да излезе и някой ще добави дубликат на горното ниво (поради наличието на надписи над входната врата).

От миналата година не съм бил там, но съдейки по информацията в фейсбук, само са добавили ново пространство с нов бар и още маси. Реално пак си е към тях, предполагам че е и със същото работно време. Ако е така, не е нужно да има втори възел.

Иначе за по-обикновените магазини е така. Когато два съседни магазина станат един общ, изтрива се закрития (като се уточнява и в коментара за промяната, иначе не е много ясно). Ако просто се е изнесъл/фалирал или нещо подобно и скоро няма да отвори, се отбелязва като вакантен (shop=vacant) или като неизползван (disused:shop=*).
literan (2026-06-22 18:51:37+00:00): здесь же стоит на здании тег was:building=retail, зачем вы вновь отрисовываете его куски?
Ozon OSM4 (2026-07-01 07:18:59+00:00): не заметила тег. Спасибо
rempshaener (2026-06-21 16:59:43+00:00): Hallo,
in den Weg ist Kies. bzw. Split eingearbeitet. Nach der Wiki-Definition ist das kein "dirt", siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:surface=dirt?uselang=de
Viele Grüße
橘ヒカリ (2026-06-23 14:29:37+00:00): 站内的黄公线是不是忘了名字？
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184378392
紬ヴェンダース (2026-06-24 01:59:13+00:00): 确实是忘掉了，已经加回来了~~
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184378392
urk (2026-07-13 09:27:38+00:00): Hallo "jageissler1966", du hast hier eine weitere (3.) Ladestation eingetragen, obwohl es genau zwei gibt, die bereits getaggt sind. Die 3. gibt es nicht.
Schöne Grüße - Uwe
gurglypipe (2026-06-21 09:12:59+00:00): Heya, thanks for improving these houses! When splitting terraces, please remember to change the building type — building=terrace means a whole row of terraced houses, so when splitting, each house needs to be changed to building=house house=terraced.

I’ve done that for these houses in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184381404
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-23 05:13:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1514825437
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531159097

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
BCNorwich (2026-06-22 05:25:12+00:00): You are still duplicating highways, which then disrupts routing. Your relation is also meaningless. I've removed Way: Salemppur - Panapur Rd (1531159704) and the relation.
nileshbarawkar (2026-06-24 05:04:46+00:00): You are still change highway classification wrong, Which is disrupts routing.
Taya_S (2026-06-22 08:40:21+00:00): Please be aware that you've unknowingly engaged in an edit war here. Your fixing of the phone number formatting is absolutely correct, but maybe consider implementing some sort of detection for this kind of thing.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184414334
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13931968501/history

Best regards,  
Taya Snijder
confusedbuffalo (2026-06-22 09:05:22+00:00): Thank you, I will have a look. Although there definitely seems to be some sort of bug in CoMaps
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-01 16:26:47+00:00): After a further report, I have implemented a tracker and the bot will not edit an element that has been edited by the bot within the past month (going forward)