piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
W0lle (2023-06-04 21:21:58+00:00): Tatsache. Die Lärmschutzwand habe ich beim editieren glatt vergessen. Meine Garmin Aufzeichnungen von dem Tag waren ziemlich schlech und so habe ich mich wie vermutet dann auf Bing Maps verlassen.
Ich werden den Weg zeitnah nochmal begehen und die Einträge korrigieren. Danke für den Hinweis. :-)
george1201 (2023-06-04 21:31:19+00:00): Leider hat kurz nach deiner Änderung der User ratrun den Weg 1059978660 auch noch komplett gelöscht. Ich habe mal bei ihm angefragt, warum er das getan hat (siehe meinen Kommentar zu CS 136871431).
george1201 (2023-06-05 20:35:31+00:00): Durch die Änderung ist auch der Weg zur Tür in der Lärmschutzwand verloren gegangen. Weil es hier nachfolgend mit CS 136871431 eine weitere Änderung durch ratrun gab, habe ich ihn fälschlicherweise verdächtigt. Siehe die dortigen Kommentare zum CS.
W0lle (2023-06-05 22:29:59+00:00): Ein Drama. Ich werde wahrscheinlich heute hinfahren und die Wege neu erfassen.
W0lle (2023-06-06 23:38:54+00:00): Das sollte so jetzt wieder einigermaßen stimmen. Weg zur Tür und hinter die Lärmschutzwand sind wieder da. Vom Weg zur Tür scheint es noch einen Abzweig zu den Kleingärten zu geben (oder ich habe den Weg 124748078 gesehen).
george1201 (2023-06-07 09:43:45+00:00): Danke. Sieht schon wieder besser aus. Die Tür sollte man wohl auch mit den Wegen verbinden (auf beiden Seiten der Wand). Bei der hatte ich mal access=no eingetragen, was sicher nicht richtig ist. Irgendjemand (mindestens die Feuerwehr) hat sicher einen Schlüssel. Privat wäre wohl passender.
Nordpfeil (2023-06-05 07:47:03+00:00): Hola Irving: Primero te doy el bienvenido al club OSM y le agradezco su gran esfuerzo de hacer visible los Centris Naranja. El tema es que OSM es un banco de datos que tiene una estructura y códigos "ríjidos" para que los datos puedan ser analizados y procesados por las aplicaciones que utilicen OSM. Me he permitido la libertad para hacer compatible las contribuciones suyo con el sintax. Recomiendo echar un vistazo a las claves y valores que he puse para entender mejor como funciona. Con un amistoso saludo 
Peter
little_maper (2023-06-04 11:33:16+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy;
I see you made some streets under construction and we updated this location according to the latest satellite image in Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-04-05, in this changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135645459
 Also, you used an old satellite image to update this way 587281842.
Could you check it and fix it, please?
also, you can see this connection its appear in the sentinel:
https://apps.sentinel-hub.com/sentinel-playground/?source=S2L2A&lat=36.20639483362012&lng=44.129776057899&zoom=16
Regards
little_maper
little_maper (2023-06-04 12:27:26+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy;
Thank you, and I wish you fixed this location as soon as possible because it's a major highway in this section also it appears on the last satellite image as I mention.
Regards
little_maper
Ahmad-0772 (2023-06-12 11:55:53+00:00): Hi LockOnGuy,

I would like to address an issue regarding the recent edits you made to the map data of Erbil. As a resident of Erbil, I am quite familiar with the roads in the city, and it appears that your edits have resulted in vandalism and the destruction of detailed map updates from the Digital Egypt team.

While I am uncertain of your location, it is evident that you are either unfamiliar with the area or lack the necessary knowledge to accurately update the map. I kindly request that you refrain from making such edits in the future to avoid further complications.

To the attention of @little_maper and the Digital Egypt team, I urge you to review and make the necessary changes to the map data according to the new information available. It is clear that the user responsible for the edits lacks expertise in the roads of ERBIL and does not possess the necessary data to make accurate updates.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Best regards,
Ahmed
LockOnGuy (2023-06-12 12:09:59+00:00): Hello Ahmad-0772,       
Thank you for your comment, can you please provide examples of things I edited that you are unhappy with?         
Regards.
Ahmad-0772 (2023-06-12 12:11:30+00:00): Link to video of new part of the motorway
https://youtu.be/HNMnYTqYd5E

https://youtu.be/nFl7F5BynA0

https://youtu.be/VeBZJlDh1mo
LockOnGuy (2023-06-12 12:14:29+00:00): Dear Ahmad-0772, Please provide the way/node numbers. Please give examples so we can pin point where is or what you are unhappy with.         
Regards.
Spush (2023-06-05 13:37:43+00:00): Magánútra nem kell kiírni, hogy magánút, elég csak access=private taggel ellátni az utat.
szydzio (2023-06-08 14:38:40+00:00): Hi!
 Wäre es nicht mehr sinnvoll anstatt von access=no einfach disused:aerialway zu nutzen ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:*
Grüß!
Udarian (2023-06-02 04:19:30+00:00): fixes https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3634841
kuhni74 (2023-10-06 14:00:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2258885151 is in the caldera, not at the highest peak. I think that the ele of 2258885151 should be deleted, because there is no peak there.
kuhni74 (2023-10-06 13:56:39+00:00): Here is the caldera (with a central summit of maybe 77m a.s.l.), whereas the highest peak of the caldera is at the southwest (already mapped), at 253 m a.s.l. I think that this peak here should be corrected to "ele=77".
MxxCon (2023-06-03 02:38:00+00:00): Hello.
You tagged the whole Hudson bay as not allowing dogs. That doesn't seem correct or relevant tag for the bay..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136852108
mikeocool (2023-06-06 15:27:00+00:00): Whoops -- that was definitely not my intention.  Fixed. Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2023-06-02 11:23:11+00:00): Hi,

You added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178248789
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178248840
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178248788

with no tags. Could you please go back and tag them? Thanks!
Dave Nadolsky (2023-06-05 15:55:36+00:00): Done
olo81 (2023-06-27 04:20:53+00:00): W Sosnowcu trasa nie jest wyznakowana. Kończy się na granicy z Sosnowcem. 

https://www.katowice.eu/rowerem/SiteAssets/rowerem/trasy-rowerowe/mapa/Mapa_%C5%9Acie%C5%BCek_Rowerowych_2018.pdf
MKnight (2023-06-02 08:12:30+00:00): Ich habe diese Änderung rückgängig gemacht. Die Strasse Tannenhügel ist eine Strasse weiter westlich.
MKnight (2023-06-02 08:14:52+00:00): Nachtrag: Google Maps ist keine Quelle für OSM, im übrigen heisst die Strasse dort auch Lerchenweg.
Kraan46 (2023-06-02 06:09:27+00:00): #hotosm-project-14513 #CycloneFreddy #TropicalCycloneFreddy #mrcs
user_5359 (2023-06-07 05:51:17+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on http://www.osm.org/way/32539069 (one of five objects)? Did you now the key https://taginfo.osm.org/keys/maxlength%3Ahgv#overview ?
bielebog (2023-06-07 16:52:17+00:00): Thanks for spotting this. Changed to maxlength=12 according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxlength in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137064240 as this applies to all vehicles, not only hgv according to https://korkortonline.se/en/theory/road-signs/prohibitory-signs/c18/
Frans S (2023-06-02 08:55:10+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A have a question/remark.
You are an experienced mapper. Why do you waste your time and experience on low-hanging fruit ?  (Dutch verb. No idea if there is a similar verb in English) easy, simple tasks, good for new mappers
Please select the more complex tasks.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136853932
Tsu-Yi Su (2023-06-03 09:04:11+00:00): Hello Fran, thank you for the question. I guess I was not confident of my skill to map more complex tasks, or to validate other's tasks. I realised that I might have been limiting myself in the comfort zone after reading your comment. Will step out of it, thank you for the reminder. Best Regards, Tsu-Yi
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136853932
Frans S (2023-06-03 09:14:36+00:00): Hi,
Sorry to hear you are going to quit.
Just clarifying some things.
I am not criticizing your mapping quality and have no problem with you mapping easy tasks. 
Even if you map these tasks, we appreciate everyone's efforts.
Kind regards.
Sorry to hear you are going to quit.
Just clarifying some things.
I am not criticizing your mapping quality and have no problem with you mapping easy tasks. 
Even if you map these tasks, we appreciate everyone's efforts.
Kind regards.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136853932
Tsu-Yi Su (2023-06-05 05:55:30+00:00): Hi Fran,
No, I am not going to quit, and I apologise for the confusion caused. 
I will now start mapping the more challenging tasks and want to thank you for the reminder. :) 
Best Regards,
Tsu-Yi
5m4u9 (2023-06-05 14:51:17+00:00): Hola, el cambio lo voy a tener que revertir, por varias razones:

El nombre de la vía del tren no es del nombre de la línea de transporte, más o menos sigue el formato de los buses: «Bus 205» (tipo_transporte id_línea)

El tranvía de cochabamba, no es un tram sino un light_rail, porque los «tram» están integrados a las calles y las comparten, los «ligh_rail» son trenes separados de todo el tráfico, en plataformas, justo como los que construyeron. Quizá la línea amarilla sea un «tram» si alguna vez la construyen.

Yo también tenía dudas a un principio cuando comenzaron a construir, pero en español de cochabamba llaman cualquier cosa con otros nombres.
Luz Choque (2023-06-05 17:08:42+00:00): Hola, gracias por tu mensaje. Tenía algunas dudas, pero traté de resolverlas según la información de OSM.

En primer lugar, con respecto al nombre de la vía, como mencionaste, el tipo sería Tranvía y el ID considero que podría ser Línea Roja o Línea Verde, ya que así es como se está identificando actualmente. Si estás de acuerdo con esa propuesta, entonces debemos modificar el nombre de la vía.

Respecto a si se trata de un "Tram" o "light_rail", entiendo tu observación. El mismo wiki de OSM indica que no siempre puede ser de una forma específica (ver segundo párrafo de la definición en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dlight_rail). También me basé en el hecho de que un tren ligero generalmente tiene un sistema más grande y recorre tramos más largos que un tranvía (según la definición de "light_rail" en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:railway), y actualmente eso no se cumple. Por lo tanto, tiendo a considerarlo más como un tranvía.

Entiendo que el tema puede ser confuso, pero me gustaría que lo hablemos para llegar a un acuerdo. Por ahora, me alegra que ambos coincidimos en que no es correcto llamarlo Tren. Saludos!
5m4u9 (2023-06-05 20:08:48+00:00): Hola, gracias por responder.

Sobre el «nombre» de las vías férreas, tenía que escribir «ref» y no «id», así sería «Tranvía R o Tranvía V» y para que sea entendible lo completé.

Sobre el tipo de transporte, cierto que no es muy claro diferenciar, qué parte de la vaga definición «light_rail» no sé cumple?. Yendo al otro lado, «tram» es más claro en su definición...  "This tag can be used for tracks which are mainly or exclusively used for trams, or where tram tracks are laid within a normal road open to all traffic, often called street running" 

Esa exclusividad por las que transita son las jardineras centrales de avenidas, sin plataforma.

Estoy abierto a pensar de otra forma, pero hasta ahora yo pienso que la diferencia tram vs light_rail, «tram» son los antiguos tranvías a nivel de la calle (como los antiguos de elfec de los años 1930), los «light_rail» son la versión moderna para ciudades, más rápidos y con tendencia a segregar del resto de modos de transporte. Pero estoy abierto.

Para aclarar más, viendo las fotos en la wikipedia de «tram» te das cuenta, la línea R y V no son trams.
map per (2023-06-02 08:53:16+00:00): Hello lxndrn,

and welcome to OpenStreetMaps!

is there really a guest house called "Даниела" that should be uploaded to the public OSM database or is that a personal bookmark?

Thanks and best regards
map per

P.S. Find out more about OSM on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/About_OpenStreetMap
map per (2023-06-11 14:29:21+00:00): Hab das guest_house auf questionable gesetzt
JeroenHoek (2023-06-05 07:58:06+00:00): Mooie toevoeging.

Ik zou in lijn met de richtlijnen voor naamgeving op OpenStreetMap nog wel de name-tag aanpassen naar enkel 'De 3' (zonder aanhalingstekens), en een veld 'description' toevoegen met daarin 'Doarspmûne Reduzum'.
user_5359 (2023-06-06 06:04:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the mean of this tag Pluscode = 7JWVM749+WFW?
ڕاستی (2023-06-22 19:42:58+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy why you fill name tag in Arabic. You know it is must be in Kurdish not Arabic, can you please explain.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136855148
ڕاستی (2023-06-22 19:45:46+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy again you fill name tag in Arabic. You know it is must be in Kurdish not Arabic.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136855148
ڕاستی (2023-06-22 19:48:53+00:00): And you did the same on WAY: 443476543, 1067119080 and 1028943341. Please fix what you did.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136855148
LockOnGuy (2023-06-22 19:50:03+00:00): Hello, I assume you’re talking about the ways that had no names previously and I added the names in Arabic.   
What is the problem? Ain’t Arabic an official language of the region alongside Kurdish?       
But the reason I picked Arabic, because it’s a language I’m familiar with, and since it’s an official language to the country and the region then it’s correct.    
See: https://archive.gov.krd/dfr/dfr.gov.krd/p/p9728.html#:~:text=Language-,The%20Kurdistan%20Region’s%20official%20languages%20for%20government%20purposes%20are%20Kurdish%20and%20Arabic.,-The%20two%20most      
Regards.
ڕاستی (2023-06-22 19:51:26+00:00): And you added (short_name:ar = کرکوك) this name is wrong there is no such a short name you typed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136855148
ڕاستی (2023-06-22 19:52:58+00:00): The same wrong short name in Arabic here (WAY: 530659957).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136855148
ڕاستی (2023-06-22 19:54:13+00:00): Again main name tag in Arabic (WAY: 631265743)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136855148
LockOnGuy (2023-06-22 19:55:13+00:00): Hello, I did not add this tag “short_name:ar”, its you the one who added it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530659957/history      
Regards.
silversurfer83 (2023-06-02 19:45:05+00:00): Moin
sind das jetzt Reste vom Steinbruch? Dann war mein Tagging korrekt, denn von Menschenhand gemacht.
Sind es natürliche Abbruchkanten? Dann natural.
Da hier jedoch über einen alten Steinbruch gesprochen wird empfehle ich noch einmal zu gucken, was ich in einem früheren Kommentar geschrieben habe. Dort habe ich auch den Artikel zu Steinbrüchen verlinkt.

Du darfst hier auch gerne Antworten und dann können wir uns darüber austauschen, wie es denn korrekt sein könnte. Ohne Antwort von Dir bleibt es jedoch eher einseitig.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136855160
luk323 (2023-06-16 11:23:52+00:00): Also die Abbruchkante ist nicht natürlich, aber ich wusste leider nicht genau, wie ich das eintragen soll. Vielleicht ist es auch besser die Abbruchkante nicht einzuzeichnen.
silversurfer83 (2023-06-16 13:20:19+00:00): Ok. Dann machen wir da, entsprechend dem Artikel im Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dquarry) wieder man_made=embankment aus den Kanten. Sie einzuzeichnen ist vollkommen in Ordnung und entspricht ja auch hoffentlich der Realität vor Ort.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 06:07:00+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164841463
Tomas Straupis (2023-06-02 12:30:49+00:00): Laba diena. O čia visas pastatas draugijai priklauso?
*Martin* (2023-06-02 07:40:34+00:00): fixes wrong postal codes introduced in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/19052089
TBKMrt (2025-04-08 16:27:42+00:00): Frage bezüglich des "Hundegrab" - wie ist dieses ausgestaltet? Als ich neulich dort vorbei gekommen bin war dort nur ein Stein am Boden. Dieser Stein sah mir mit seinen Zeichen aber eher nach einer Art (Wander)Wegmarkierung aus.
TBKMrt (2025-04-08 16:28:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4701836
VictorIE (2023-06-05 23:49:30+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/951133969/history

Try to use alt_name=* instead of adding multiple names to name=* :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-09 19:30:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889073150

amenity=self_storage ? Is it simply a shop=storage_rental? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=storage_rental Or is it selling boxes/packaging?

If it is certainly shop=storage_rental - would it be safe to mass-retag it without inspecting individual cases for all objects tagged this way?
jake_penguins (2024-03-09 21:43:12+00:00): In this instance, all of the extra buildings tagged as amenity=self_storage should only be tagged as building=warehouse. I only tagged the storage facility's main office with shop=storage_rental.

I wasn't aware of the standard put forth on the wiki when I tagged them. I had previously thought the standard was placing the shop=storage_rental at the storage facilty's rental office while tagging extra buildings with amenity=self_storage.

So at least in this instance, I can remove all of the amenity=self_storage tags.
user_21425661 (2024-10-15 19:52:33+00:00): You seem to have added an overlapping road+building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225718668#map=19/33.344744/-96.584043
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2024-10-23 08:27:05+00:00): Hi, user_21425661!
My name is Yuliya, and I am the Quality Control Lead on the OSM team at Lyft. I appreciate you informing us about this issue. I have corrected the error in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158240992. I apologize for the overlapping and the delayed response

Best regards,
Yuliya
永定河 (2023-06-10 07:31:29+00:00): 哥啊这不是东门吗😂东北门是这个
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/918325329
ڕاستی (2023-06-29 11:12:40+00:00): Hello the name:ar you added to (WAY: 1019645511) is not completed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136857159
ڕاستی (2023-06-29 11:12:41+00:00): Hello the name:ar you added to (WAY: 1019645511) is not completed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136857159
ڕاستی (2023-06-29 11:13:02+00:00): Hello the name:ar you added to (WAY: 1019645510) is not completed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136857159
ڕاستی (2023-06-29 11:21:18+00:00): And all way under the name:شەقامی سەعدی گچکە, is not completed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136857159
LockOnGuy (2023-06-29 11:31:12+00:00): Hello ڕاستی, can you explain in detail how it's "not completed" ?        
And if you saw somethings on the map that are "not completed" you can complete them, it's an open map everyone can contribute. If someone let's say added a road on a country, you expect them to add all roads to country? of course not, we all edit the map.      
Regards.
4004 (2023-06-05 23:02:04+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
так и не нашел, откуда ноги у смены названия - в изначальном решение исполкома от 2012 года старое написание. Не подскажете, откуда информация?
aceman444 (2023-06-02 09:49:02+00:00): Dobra praca, snad Vas nedodzubu za celosvetovy rozsah sady zmien a hromadne zmeny :)
*Martin* (2023-06-02 10:11:36+00:00): necham sa prekvapit :-)
Javierpf (2023-06-02 13:05:02+00:00): Hello! Thank you for the updates. In the future, please split your changesets into smaller ones by specific geographic areas such as countries, provinces, etc. Examples:
you are adding/modifying 10 objects in 2 distant cities => make 2 changesets, 1 per city.
you are adding/modifying 5 objects in 5 countries => make 5 changesets, 1 per country.
Some relevant reading material: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
aceman444 (2023-08-11 16:08:18+00:00): Tak uz je to tu :)
Nomadmapper (2023-06-02 12:56:13+00:00): Bonjour,
Si le site est aussi une aire de camping car, il faut remettre alors le tag : tourism=caravan_site
doc wiki ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:tourism=caravan%20site?uselang=fr
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136857911
mga_geo (2023-06-03 06:17:13+00:00): Bonjour,
On casse toujours des ronds-points ...
Marc
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172170936
Anton_Klebanovich (2023-06-08 07:46:30+00:00): Bonjour! Merci pour vos commentaires. Rond-point de reconstruction à sens unique https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137083776
Hello! Thanks for your feedback. Reconstruction roundabout as one wayhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137083776
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-02 08:30:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178268349
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1173501462

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mga_geo (2023-06-03 06:14:44+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi avoir cassé le rond-point ?
Marc
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172170936
mga_geo (2023-06-04 06:46:42+00:00): Et pourquoi avoir supprimé les espaces dans "operator", signalement osmose http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/api/0.3/issue/236a9d4d-f1c5-9710-d696-546d842d0281
Anton_Klebanovich (2023-06-08 07:46:35+00:00): Bonjour! Merci pour vos commentaires. Rond-point de reconstruction à sens unique https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137083776
Hello! Thanks for your feedback. Reconstruction roundabout as one wayhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137083776
user_3022894 (2023-06-02 21:38:48+00:00): Hallo VRR-Onlineredaktion,

Sie haben hier das Kundencenter der Vestischen gelöscht. 

Ich vermute mal, dass das nicht Ihre Intention war?

Viele Grüße
Lukas
Nomadmapper (2023-06-02 12:56:54+00:00): Bonjour,
Idem ici, ajouter le tag tourism=caravan_site car c'est une aire de camping car ;)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:tourism=caravan%20site?uselang=fr
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136858799
silversurfer83 (2023-07-07 22:22:36+00:00): Hi :)

I just stumbled across two supermarkets that are doubles in the database and saw that you created the double entries using Organic Maps.
I like that app but I would advise you to maybe choose a different app to add POIs to the OpenStreetMap database.
I shall remove the unnecessary double entries.

Should you have any questions, just reply to this mail :)

cheers
silversurfer83
aceman444 (2023-06-02 09:51:03+00:00): Super
xronos (2023-06-02 11:54:48+00:00): читайте тут: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106407633
Константин Гам (2023-06-02 13:13:59+00:00): Надо не читать, а побывать на местности. Ежедневно сотни велосипедистов преодолевают это место, также как пешеходы, никакой проблемы нет, а вы я не знаю зачем вносите не существующие данные
xronos (2023-06-02 13:21:42+00:00): на какой адрес послать фото этого места?))
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-02 09:38:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10945839567

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-02 09:38:03+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121069886

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2023-06-02 10:58:26+00:00): Poprawione.