piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rhcripps (2026-07-03 18:51:56+00:00): Apologies for that. I’ve undone the changes. Didn't quite know what i was doing but learning fast.
LordGarySugar (2026-07-04 23:54:20+00:00): I've gone through all your changes just now, and I've removed most of the viewpoints you created as most of them were located within an existing leisure=bird_hide building. Where you had added a missing name or details I've copied that across to the existing object. I would recommend using the web editor going forwards, as organic maps is quite limited in adding and updating objects as you can see. If you have any further questions, please feel free to ask.
Rngrk (2026-07-03 08:19:58+00:00): 提供的image source不适用于此landuse, 未提供name来源
Yunan973 (2026-07-12 15:58:27+00:00): Hello,
how did you add Vantor Hub in JOSM ?
Regards
LakeShala (2026-07-13 17:51:29+00:00): Hi Yunan973,
Apple has an agreement with Vantor Hub (previously Maxar) to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which is not publicly available for editing OpenStreetMap. We generally use the imagery that is already available in JOSM but where we do use that more recent imagery, we always cite it and the date the imagery is from in the changeset source. In this changeset I forgot to add the imagery date which was 2025-09-08
Yunan973 (2026-07-18 21:30:31+00:00): Do you mean Vantor Hub doesnt work on JOSM for Windows, only on JOSM for macOS ?
LakeShala (2026-07-21 09:27:41+00:00): Hello Yunan973, Unfortunately Vantor Hub Imagery isn’t able to be added in JOSM. Apple has an agreement with Vantor to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which is not publicly available for editing. We generally use the imagery that is already available in JOSM but where we do use that more recent imagery, we always cite it and the date the imagery is from in the changeset source. Thank you and happy mapping!
luiswoo (2026-07-03 15:36:20+00:00): Название улицы "улица 12-го Февраля", а не "12 Февраля улица". Фактически -- это два разных названия, согласно правилам наименованиям: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог
Нумерация зданий: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F
eggie (2026-07-03 05:35:56+00:00): Hoi,

Maar waarom dan access=no?

Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-07-03 06:38:31+00:00): access=no heb ik verwijderd.
Dat wordt bijna altijd verkeerd gebruikt. Verboden Toegang voor iedereen. 
Geldt motor_vehicle=no  ook nog steeds?

MVG
eggie
Mcgyver1103 (2026-07-04 06:06:23+00:00): Klopt geen motor en auto. Wel landbouwverkeer.

MVG 

Mcgyver
eggie (2026-07-04 06:17:59+00:00): Oke.. dan kun je motor_vehicle=agricultural taggen ipv = no.
Denk ook op dat voorgaande stuk.
Pas jij het aan?

Mapse,
eggie
eggie (2026-07-04 06:22:33+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:motor_vehicle=agricultural
eggie (2026-07-04 07:52:47+00:00): Ik heb het als bovenstaand aangepast.
Fraxi (2026-07-03 09:07:39+00:00): За Mr. Dino няма да е грешка и да се промени основния таг на craft=bakery
От уикито:
A workplace for the manufacture of fresh PASTRY and bakery goods.
Това ме подсети да променя тага за едно друго място.
Kaloan-koko (2026-07-11 10:02:51+00:00): Не знам, за мен по-удачно е както е в момента, но този таг почти не се ползва.
За мен е странно при наличие на разделение "shop=bakery" и "shop=pastry", то да отсъства за ключа "craft".
Dimitar155 (2026-07-12 18:42:20+00:00): craft=pastry също е вариант, макар че той е още по-рядък :)
Yunan973 (2026-07-03 13:29:23+00:00): Bonjour,

il y a beaucoup de choses cassées dans ce secteur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/234282958 : 39 relations sur ce chemin, mais seulement 14 sur la voie permettant d'accéder d'y accéder.

Exemple avec cette relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12206312#map=19/44.056540/5.057777

Cordialement
Patchi (2026-07-03 14:04:56+00:00): Bonjour,

Oui je sais je n'ai pas eu le temps de corriger toutes les relations cassées. Les relations de bus 910, 911, 012 ainsi que A, B, D, E et le parc naturel régional du Mont-Ventoux devraient être corrigées.

Merci de contacter l'utilisateur Numa_ à l'origine des relations cassées pour plus de détails.

Bonne continuation,

Patchi.
Loopslol7 (2026-07-04 06:58:00+00:00): very important edit, thank you
BCNorwich (2026-07-04 05:33:01+00:00): Your fiction motorway has been removed.
Monchinho (2026-07-03 09:39:38+00:00): En Galicia es preferible mantener el nombre "Estrada Logroño - Vigo" para esta carretera o, si se desea, añadir el nombre que está cambiando en name:es
BCNorwich (2026-07-04 05:36:50+00:00): Your mapping would look better if the buildings were drawn more precisely and squared up.
eggie (2026-07-03 06:28:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback.. Deze langere naam lijkt me niet de naam van het gebouw.
De Prot Gemeente is het kerkgenootschap dat hier 'kerkt' en dus de operator.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-03 06:45:08+00:00): Kijk svp nog eens goed naar de wiki wat de mogelijkheden zijn om het kerkgenootschap op te namen..
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship
eggie (2026-07-03 06:32:47+00:00): Dag David..
Dit is toch niet de naam van het gebouw?

Zegt iemand dan: Ik ga naar de Protestantse Gemeente Haren - Onnen - Dorpskerk? 
Wat is de naam van de kerk?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-03 06:34:50+00:00): https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolaaskerk_(Haren)

Er is een verschil tussen de naam van een gebouw en het kerkgenootschap dat er kerkt.
ezio_m (2026-07-08 16:02:49+00:00): ciao Aluminum0173, le piste ciclabili/ciclopedonali su corsia riservata e le corsie ciclabili vanno mappate sulle way corrispondenti alla piattaforma stradale sulla quale sono collocati i percorsi. le highway=cycleway vanno inserite solamente quando queste sono su piattaforme separate dalla piattaforma carrabile, quindi quando vi è per esempio uno spartitraffico.
consulta pure su https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway, da cui: "cycle lanes which are part of the road without any physical separation from the other lanes except the painting on the road (don't map them as separate ways)"
Aluminum0173 (2026-07-09 06:44:26+00:00): Ok grazie mille per il commento, domanda che leggendo la wiki non ho capito, ad esempio in Via Acquario, sempre a Rimini, c'è una ciclopedonale che è dietro i parcheggi a lato strada ma non c'è un cordolo a proteggerla, è solo segnalata a terra, anche in questo caso è da taggare insieme alla strada principale?
luiswoo (2026-07-03 15:28:14+00:00): День добрый, однотипное описание правок "Ростов-на-Дону" предельно не информативно, как для окружающих, так и для собственных нужд -- что-бы примерно понимать, что произошло\ что было сделано, придётся смотреть саму правку.
EfreetSK (2026-07-03 07:14:39+00:00): A ešte jedna vec, nastavil som 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34893848

na pešiu zónu. Ono to je niečo ako námestie, organizujú sa tam rôzne športoové a spoločenské akcie, niekedy sú tam kolotoče. Ale formálne to námestie nie je. Preto mi area=yes a 
highway=pedestrian prišlo ako celkom presné aj podľa popisu na wiki
ToprakM (2026-07-07 18:18:50+00:00): Merhaba, devasa tarla alanını gece kulübü olarak tanımlamış görünüyorsunuz. Tarla olarak geri alıyorum.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9259686/history/9
eggie (2026-07-03 07:30:09+00:00): Dag Mayk  Probeer svp het gebied van je edits wat kleiner te houden.

MVG
eggie
MaykThewessen (2026-07-03 08:23:40+00:00): ah ja oeps dit was per ongeluk zo n groot gebied
Yog Sot (2026-07-03 08:59:31+00:00): wyjaśnij czemu kasujesz tyle dróg wyraźnie widocznych z ortomapy oraz wyraźnie uczęszcznych przez ludzi
user_5359 (2026-07-06 09:48:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I don't think a store is located right in the middle of an intersection. Also, the address is incomplete, and the wrong keys are being used (addr:house_number=920-10 and addr:country=JP would be correct). Furthermore, the store type and additional contact information are missing. I'm deleting the entry because there are too many errors. If you need help, feel free to leave a message.
silversurfer83 (2026-07-04 08:36:21+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OSM :)

Danke, dass ihr diese Ladestation hier erfasst habt.
Eine wichtige Info fehlt dem Objekt noch: Welche Stecker sind vorhanden?

Grüße aus Korbach
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185023991
maro21 (2026-07-12 22:43:24+00:00): Polska społeczność OSM ustaliła, że zmiana kategorii dróg typu motorway, trunk i primary wymaga wcześniejszej dyskusji. Proszę zapoznaj się z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce
Guillaume4421 (2026-07-03 19:19:07+00:00): Ouiii je pourrai arriver à l'heure grâce à un super guidage comme ça
maraf24 (2026-07-04 12:06:08+00:00): Poprzednie kategorie zostały przywrócone, gdyż były prawidłowe.
Marvk (2026-07-03 23:04:56+00:00): Hallo rainglasz,

kannst du hier noch die traffic_sign tags ergänzen? Vermutlich ist hier kein traffic_sign:backward=DE:1022-10 mehr?

Beste Grüße
Marv
maro21 (2026-07-12 22:44:15+00:00): Polska społeczność OSM ustaliła, że zmiana kategorii dróg typu motorway, trunk i primary wymaga wcześniejszej dyskusji. Proszę zapoznaj się z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce
kevbold (2026-07-03 08:11:18+00:00): road* change*
dzamper (2026-07-03 08:12:08+00:00): addr:city w ulicach jest pomocne dla Nominatim jak miejscowość nie ma naniesionych granic
a tutaj ich nie ma
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-29 05:20:20+00:00): DWG revert - fix incorrect tagging from undiscussed import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186562153
demon_box (2026-07-03 10:56:30+00:00): Ciao nicolatedo ho notato il tuo ultimo changeset riguardante questo edificio

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157499247

Ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti un edificio può avere più entrate e di conseguenza più numeri civici. 
Quindi hai 2 opzioni: 
1. Se conosci esattamente la posizione (entrata) del civico che stai mappando metti tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su un nodo del perimetro dell'edificio (aggiungendo anche il tag entrance sullo stesso nodo);
2. Se invece non hai questa informazione così precisa devi mettere tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su nodo adiacente ma STACCATO dal poligono dell'edificio.
Ho già proceduto con le correzioni del caso. 
Grazie e BuonMapping!
Bienson (2026-07-04 00:57:33+00:00): Bitte Gebäudeumrisse aus NRW Liegenschaftskataster verwenden
Bloomenwease (2026-07-04 09:31:20+00:00): Danke, wurde in #185082066 korrigiert. Ich habe einige der umliegenden Häuser auch angepasst und dabei ganz kleine Features der Grundrisse weggelassen. Kann man das so machen, oder sollte der Grundriss immer genau nachgebildet werden?
Bienson (2026-07-05 02:36:37+00:00): Generell sollte der Grundriss so gut wie möglich nachgebildet werden. Aber jede Verbesserung des Grundrisses ist ein Fortschritt.
Ich denke mir, wenn man es schon ändert, sollte man es dann auch exakt machen.

Es gibt wohl auch Tools zum exakten Übertrag von Kataster-Umrissen zu OSM-Umrissen.
ieguy3 (2026-07-03 08:43:14+00:00): might have not been but user didn't check his work when editing. anyway fixed it
Comino (2026-07-03 21:31:31+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
Bmanity srl (2026-07-07 15:36:34+00:00): ok thanks
nevw (2026-07-03 12:15:03+00:00): Can you take more care and map the buildings accurately. I consider all your edits to be poorly mapped in relation to what is visible in the satellite imagery.
nevw (2026-07-06 08:28:04+00:00): fixed mapping
RagnarOlafson (2026-07-07 20:31:22+00:00): Why is this line even on the map?

Almost every mapping app pulls data from OSM and this bogus stuff gets added to things that SAR teams use - not to mention countless flip flopping hikers in the Angels Rest area use these mapping apps also.

Can you imagine someone being lost in there and checking their phone app and seeing a road called 625 close by only to find out the thing isn't really there?

Please verify that extremely old/outdated alignments actually exist before putting them into OSM. 

Just causes problems like myself editing things and hurting people's feelings etc., ugh :(
Supaplex (2026-07-03 10:35:44+00:00): 請問你加上去的路燈資料來源是那來的？如果是臺中市政府請在編輯時以及資料本身都加上去
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185028422
twF6wdEYwL (2026-07-04 14:44:23+00:00): Esri World Imagery 衛星圖本身就有路燈的垂直投影
twF6wdEYwL (2026-07-04 14:48:14+00:00): 我一個一個按照Esri World Imagery衛星圖標示的
jplahti (2026-07-06 16:35:01+00:00): Osmose ilmoittaa nyt tällä alueella paljon päällekkäisyyksiä (Object tagged twice as way and relation) rakennuksissa mahdollisesti noiden relaatioiden sisältämien building-tagien takia. Oikeastaan niitä relaatioita ei aina ole tarpeen lisätä, koska se riittää, että jokainen rakennuksen osa (building:part) on varsinaisen rakennuksen (building) polygonin sisällä. Mutta ei tämä mitenkään väärin ole tehty - varsinkin noiden hankalimpien muotojen kanssa on järkevää käyttää multipolygonia. Wikistä ei kuitenkaan oikein selvinnyt mitä tageja pitäisi laitaa mihinkin.

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fi/map/#loc=17/61.501592/23.75912&item=xxxx&level=1
Lieckio (2026-07-06 19:33:48+00:00): Joo, en vain keksi mistä tuo syntyy.

type=building vaatii building tagin ulkoreunalle, ja osiin building=part - ainakin ymmärtääkseni. Tuolla on siis jossain tod. näk. päällekkäinen node tai node joka kuuluu vain toiseen building=part tjsp., mutta vaikka kuinka mergeilin, en löytänyt sitä oikeaa.
jplahti (2026-07-07 20:07:59+00:00): Hei!

Taitaa tulla tuosta, kun relaatiossa on rakennusta kuvaavat tagit. Siinä relaatiossa pitäisi riittää type=building ja rakennuksen ulkoreuna, johon relaatiosta viitataan (outline), sitten sisältää ne itse rakennuksen tagit.
Lieckio (2026-07-07 20:45:06+00:00): Hmm, muistelisin lukeneeni jostain, että nuo tiedot pitäisi olla relaatiossa (mutta ei itse rakennuksen outlinessa). Laitoin niitä nyt kuitenkin tuohon testiksi, kun tuntuu ettei OSM tunnista jos tiedot on pelkissä relationeissa.

Voi nyt toki olla, että muistan väärin ja/tai ymmärtänyt väärin niin, että nimenomaan type=building relaatiossa niitä ei tarvinnut/pitänyt olla. Taidanpa vähän tutkia, kun tulee sopiva väli!

Meinaa sitten vain, että täytyy purkaa ja/tai korjata aika kasa type=building relaatiota. Apua x)
Frans S (2026-07-04 12:18:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark,
You mapped a number of buildings, including their big shadow. Never include the shadow of a building.

Hi-rise or tall buildings (even with a few stories) needs a different way of drawing them than low buildings.

Please check this footage on how to map these buildings

https://youtu.be/u31wPYWkm3E?si=lDbvDutpUyZWQXXL

A more extended explanation with samples can be seen here

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling#Drawing_at_the_roof

Additional find here a link to how to map complex situations
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Koreller/diary/404988#comment61337


Best regards

Best regards
Enock4seth (2026-07-03 13:24:32+00:00): Hi, I can see you have now delete this non-existing way by yourself.  You and Uber should understand that if OSM data is useless nobody is going to use it. Quality is better than quantity. OSM is not just a hit and go gig so please don't add trash.
pavithrasivakumar (2026-07-06 12:20:43+00:00): Hi Enock4seth, 
Thanks for looking into this. The segment was initially added using internal evidence. However, after double-checking the aerial imagery and realizing it was incorrect, I went ahead and deleted it. 
I agree that quality comes first and will keep this in mind for future edits.
Thanks,
Pavithra
rarad74 (2026-07-04 13:55:03+00:00): Salut te rog sa modifici si sa pui diacritice la tot ce inseamna nume cu diacritice gen Fundătura ( nu se pune fundatura) si in in restul denumirilor.
Multumesc.
Bienson (2026-07-04 01:02:56+00:00): Ein Stromhäuschen ist building=service
Bloomenwease (2026-07-04 09:33:44+00:00): Danke, ist korrigiert.
silversurfer83 (2026-07-04 09:20:53+00:00): Moin

was genau hast du denn hier vor? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249021270
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185031067
Cowboy79 (2026-07-04 09:25:31+00:00): Hab das Kindergartengebäude von Kindergartenfläche nach Kindergartengebäude geändert. Oder?
silversurfer83 (2026-07-04 09:37:14+00:00): Ja. Jetzt ist es aber nur noch ein Kindergartengebäude. Du hast das education=kindergarten entfernt. Wenn dort noch Betreuung stattfindet sollte das wieder dran.

Achte immer auf die vollständige Liste der Eigenschaften eines Objekts. Findest du, wenn ein Objekt ausgewählt ist, links unten unter dem Abschnitt "Eigenschaften". Wenn du einfach an den Presets rumspielst kann das nämlich unerwünschte Ergebnisse haben.

Grüße :)

P.S. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Cowboy79 (2026-07-04 10:20:56+00:00): Die Eigenschaftenliste habe ich schon mal gesehen, danke... ;-)

Schaut man sich die wikis für building=kindegarten und amenity=kindegarten an, steht dort nichts von education, nicht mal als Vorschlag. Ebenso kommt keine Fehlermeldung, dass etwas fehle oder falsch wäre, wenn man nur das building einträgt und speichert. Lediglich bei der Kindergartenfläche hängt es automatsich dran. Auch das wiki zu education=kindergarten ist praktisch leer. Und zu guter Letzt: Erstellt oder ändert man zum building=kindegarten wird education AUTOMATISCH GELÖSCHT!
Schaden kann's nicht, deshalb (aber vor allem dir zuliebe) hab ich es jetzt nochmal hinzugefügt.

Beste Grüße

P.S.: Ich hab oft drüber nachgedacht, welchen changeset-Kommentar ich schreiben könnte und was das wem bringt. Und auch was andere so kommentieren. Und ich bin überzeugter denn je, dass das komplette Zeitverschwendung ist. Siehe die alte Diskussion. Und auch bezugnehmend auf ältere Diskussionen: Nimm dir mal die Zeit, die wir für diese Kleinigkeit - für diesen Fehler, der gar keiner war - jetzt verschwendet haben. Was gerade du mit deiner Expertise in der Zeit alles hättest kartieren können!?
silversurfer83 (2026-07-04 10:35:03+00:00): Das education=* Schema ist noch relativ neu. Da scheinen die Freiwilligen, die das Wiki pflegen noch Nachholbedarf zu haben.
weiterhin korrekt ist ja amenity=kindergarten , was wichtig für einen Kindergarten schon nötig ist (oder halt education=kindergarten). building=* beschreibt nur, wofür ein Gebäude gebaut wurde. Hast du also ein purpose-built Kindergartengebäude und dort ist irgendwann kein Kindergarten mehr drin, dann bleibt das trotzdem ein Kindergartengebäude so lange es keine großen baulichen Änderungen gibt.

Und nein, Änderungssatzkommentare sind keine Zeitverschwendung ;)
DressyPear4 (2026-07-07 12:47:50+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/185263413
DressyPear4 (2026-07-07 12:47:49+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/185263413
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-21 04:47:04+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Cleaned up SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186095339
DressyPear4 (2026-07-07 12:36:03+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/185262855
Papweer_Import (2026-07-09 11:50:08+00:00): This changeset was uploaded to the wrong account. It should have been uploaded to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Papweer
DressyPear4 (2026-07-07 12:36:02+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/185262855
osmviborg (2026-07-03 11:11:56+00:00): Du bruger 2025 billeder til redigering, med det resultat at en redigering lavet på baggrund af 2026 billeder nu  er ødelagt. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/quick-luftfoto-2023-nogle-omrader-i-danmark-er-klar/98511/24
Sandonin (2026-07-03 10:39:02+00:00): *autour de Feyzin
CRCulver (2026-07-06 11:55:02+00:00): Do not remove name= tags from border_crossing barrier nodes. I have reverted your changes in changeset 185193684.
KingVik (2026-07-03 11:06:26+00:00): Thank you Dider for updating this
Did you by any chance know the name of the roads, that will be very helpful to improve the attribute of the road
Alekwallace26! (2026-07-06 13:09:16+00:00): Why would you change this I can show you pictures of the large gate they built here 8 months ago
Wildsharky (2026-07-09 05:55:45+00:00): Hi Alekwallace26,
Thank you for your comment and for offering to provide additional information.

I initially thought that service=emergency_access would also imply access=no and removed the tag. After reviewing Tag:service=emergency_access - OpenStreetMap Wiki I’m seeing that additional access tag would be meaningful. 

 Changeset reverted to its previous version. Thank you for bringing to my attention. Much appreciated.
DressyPear4 (2026-07-07 12:36:01+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/185262855
DressyPear4 (2026-07-07 12:36:00+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/185262855
joost schouppe (2026-07-06 07:33:37+00:00): If https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1242781281/ is called "Ancienne salle communale", wouldn't that make it a disused:amenity=community_centre?
Eebie (2026-07-06 08:31:05+00:00): It is adapted
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-21 04:02:15+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Cleaned up adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186094042
eggie (2026-07-03 19:50:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
MxxCon (2026-07-06 01:31:57+00:00): Hello.
I don't think it's worth creating a dual-carriageway just because there's a pedestrian traffic island at an intersection..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185033261
Radek_trz (2026-07-06 06:52:55+00:00): Hello,
Traffic island is not a major reason. There are multiple separating features between 126st (west end) to 131st (east end). But most important reason is very complicated intersection geometry of Hillside Av, Metropolitan Av and 130st.
IMO turn restrictions are not sufficient here. When I drove there for the first time I was confused how differently it looks from what I saw on map before.

I hope You understand my reasoning.

Regards
Taya_S (2026-07-03 11:05:04+00:00): Hello Satisfação,

please make sure to only map the actual legal speed limits, not the speeds at which people usually drive on roads.

Best regards,  
Taya Snijder,  
On behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
DressyPear4 (2026-07-07 12:35:59+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/185262855
KingVik (2026-07-03 11:06:12+00:00): Thank you Dider for updating this
Did you by any chance know the name of the roads, that will be very helpful to improve the attribute of the road
kadiwa (2026-07-04 20:45:56+00:00): Danke, dass du dich für gegen das Einschleichen von Datenfehlern einsetzt :D In Hamburg hat sich ja in der Vergangenheit leider schon einiges an Datenfehlern angesammelt, was Radwege anbelangt.
Wulf4096 (2026-07-05 05:14:08+00:00): Man tut ja was man kann :)

Ich sehe aber gerade, dass hier sowohl der Nebenweg als auch der Hauptweg ebenfalls falsch getaggt sind :(