piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
A67-A67 (2025-11-23 20:06:23+00:00): In principe taggen we 'ground truth', dus 1. Aspecten 2 (routering) en 3 (kaartrendering) worden grotendeels door 3e partijen gedaan. Vanuit Openstreetmap is het belangrijk dat er een goede database is om dat mogelijk te maken.

De key disused:highway is een niche-key, die zeer beperkt wordt gebruikt, ongeveer 2500x in Nederland en dan ook nog vooral voor bushaltes die buiten gebruik zijn, maar misschien terugkomen. https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/europe:netherlands/keys/disused:highway#values

Voor afsluitingen hebben we access-tags, die ook renderen en een weg uit te routering halen. De key disused:highway wordt gebruikt voor opgeheven objecten, die we om een reden nog in de database willen houden.
Bauxite (2025-11-24 20:31:12+00:00): Bonjour. Je vois que vous avez changé le SIRET de cet établissement il y a 4 jours, mais celui que vous avez entré (81183444900019) est erroné. Il correspond à un établissement de la même entreprise, mais localisé à Aubervilliers, et qui de surcroit a fermé il y a plus de 10 ans : https://annuaire-entreprises.data.gouv.fr/etablissement/81183444900019

Le SIRET qui était indiqué avant votre modification (81183444900027) me paraissait bien être correct.

Par ailleurs, je suis un peu perplexe quand au changement du nom "Biocoop" en "BioCoop". En effet, ce mot est systématiquement écrit "Biocoop" sur le site de la boutique (https://biocoop-aligre.biocoop.net/), et de même sur biocoop.fr. Je ne vois pas trop ce qui justifierait le C majuscule.
Bauxite (2025-12-25 12:00:49+00:00): Bonjour. En l’absence de réponse, j’ai restauré moi-même le numéro SIRET précédant votre modification.
trial (2025-12-25 14:14:16+00:00): Merci, pas de réponse au bout d'un mois. Ça en dit long sur le professionnalisme de Votre Problème de Visibilité Digitale Locale.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-01-02 08:04:54+00:00): Bonjour Bauxite, Désolé, je n'avais pas vu votre message, il est vrai que Biocoop nous a envoyé énormément de siret erroné, nous avons bloqué la plupart mais celui ci est apparemment passé. Merci de l'avoir modifié. Bonne journée.
osmmapper222 (2025-11-20 21:14:06+00:00): Hallo nogger13,

es gibt mehrere OSM-Notes bzgl. der temporären Schließung des Rewes und anderer Lokalitäten:

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4927302
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4928846
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4928958

Sind diese wieder geöffnet?
nogger13 (2025-11-20 21:18:24+00:00): Jap. Der Rewe hat seit heute wieder auf.

Die Hinweise/Nodes habe ich nicht gesehen und weiß leider nicht wie ich die bearbeiten kann.
osmmapper222 (2025-11-20 21:24:10+00:00): Die Notes man wie diese Änderung Kommentieren und ggf. schließen. 

Wenn du Ortskenntnisse hast, dann kannst du diese ggf. auch bearbeiten. 

Hier findest Du einen Screenshot zum Ein/Ausblenden der Hinweise:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Notes#Hinweismarker_ausblenden
nogger13 (2025-11-20 21:31:22+00:00): Ah danke für den Hinweis. Wenn ich das richtig verstanden habe, hast Du die drei Hinweise jetzt auf erledigt gesetzt?
osmmapper222 (2025-11-20 21:39:46+00:00): Genau. Da der Rewe wieder geöffnet hat, sind die Notes nicht mehr relevant gewesen.
SomeoneElse (2025-11-29 14:01:29+00:00): Hello,
Is there any reason why
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6490317#map=19/51.534133/-0.006630
has a gap in it that is a different relation
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17648128
Best Regards,
Andy
MacLondon (2025-11-29 23:05:09+00:00): Yes, it should all be in the same relation. I've corrected the error now.
SomeoneElse (2025-11-29 23:11:03+00:00): Thanks!
trial (2025-11-20 21:13:38+00:00): Tu peux ajouter height=5, c'est assez peu ordinaire !
XioNoX (2025-11-20 21:29:48+00:00): vas y ;)
trial (2025-11-20 21:41:19+00:00): J'peux pas, les adresses m'ont tuer ;-).
trial (2026-06-10 16:44:46+00:00): On a même une vue Panoramax, ou plutôt Panoramin : c8562bdd-22e6-4d2c-838e-a9e1a40f5c0e
https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?background=streets&focus=pic&map=18.49/48.3869813/-4.482237&pic=c8562bdd-22e6-4d2c-838e-a9e1a40f5c0e&seq=12f6f64d-fa8d-4b43-ad4d-b898f92c1654&speed=250&theme=default&users=default&xyz=314.63/5.36/88
eggie (2025-11-20 21:27:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Je hoeft geen adressen toe te voegen aan gebouwomtrekken. Er zijn al adresnodes.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
adrian-c137 (2025-11-20 22:38:22+00:00): Bedankt, ik zal de tips eerst lezen 👌🏻
michel60 (2025-11-29 09:51:35+00:00): Bonjour,
Je vois que vous travaillez sur la ligne de bus Bus 144 : Rueil Malmaison RER → La Défense : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3307634
Un bon moyen visuel de controler les lignes de bus c'est GEOFABRIK OSM Inspector avec le lien ci-dessous : 
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=2.19183&lat=48.86919&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.93&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
En cliquant sur une ligne en noir, on peut visualiser l'erreur. Exemple pour celle-ci : Stop or platform with empty role pour la station "Croix du Roy
En espérant que cet outils vous aidera ...
Mon souhait, c'est que toutes les lignes soit en vert ...
Cordialement Michel
bartgron (2025-11-20 21:50:24+00:00): Tradycyjne pytanie: czy restauracja zajmuje CAŁY budynek, czy tylko na przykład parter? W przypadku braku odpowiedzi edycja zostanie wycofana
RestauracjaTowarzyska (2025-11-20 22:45:39+00:00): jest to parter i piwnica. jak to oznaczyć aby było prawidłowo?
bartgron (2025-11-21 07:20:55+00:00): Dziękuję za odpowiedź, jak tylko siądę do komputera oznaczę to odpowiednio
sundew (2025-11-25 22:52:10+00:00): Hi OPerivar,

bitte noch die check_dates an den Briefkästen in Lüder und Röhrsen updaten, die du schon geprüft/angepasst hast. Da du alles zwischen B.Bodenteich und Wittingen dieses Jahr schon gemacht hast, konnte ich am Sonntag meine Tour schon in Wittingen abkürzen.

Danke und LG,
sundew
OPerivar (2025-11-28 16:55:30+00:00): Moin, habe es in changeset 175246643 erledigt
sundew (2025-11-28 17:05:30+00:00): Vielen Dank & LG ..
limes11 (2025-11-20 23:37:23+00:00): Hallo, 

wenn da keine Einschränkungen sind, dann bitte das vehicle=no entfernen. vehicle=no mit motor_vehicle=yes ist nicht logisch.

Beste Grüße
309_308_307 (2025-11-21 00:55:49+00:00): Hallo, ich kenn die Stelle. Das ist ein illegaler Bahnübergang, der nicht betreten werden darf (vor Ort steht auch ein Hinweisschild "Betreten verboten!") Gepflastert ist er vermutlich nur für Einsatzfahrzeuge, denn wenn dort jemand durchfährt, dann krachts. Richtig wäre hier vermutlich access=no, denn man darf auch als Fußgänger nicht da rüber.
skotek (2025-11-22 07:54:57+00:00): Grundsätzlich darf nur das gemappt werden, was der tatsächlichen Situation vor Ort entspricht. Verbotsschilder für diese asphaltierte Straßenbahnquerung fehlen. Es gibt lediglich Gebotsschilder, die Fahrtrichtungen für Fahrzeuge vorschreiben. Für Fußgänger gibt es keine Beschränkungen.

Um die Situtation zu überprüfen, habe ich mir das vor Ort nochmals genau angeschaut. Dort und auch an allen benachbarten ebenfalls legalen Querungsmöglichkeiten hängt ein Schild, das ein Betreten der Bahnanlagen (außerhalb) der Querungmöglichkeiten verbietet. Demnach dürfen die Gleise nicht als Gehweg genutzt werden. Eine Querung ist jedoch erlaubt.
skotek (2025-11-22 07:59:44+00:00): @limes11 Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe alle expliziten Zugangsberechtigungen entfernt, so dass nun jeder diesen Abschnitt nutzen kann.
limes11 (2025-11-22 09:21:27+00:00): In der Tat sieht man auf StreetView keine Verbotsschilder...sogar ein Fahrzeug, das gerade einen U-turn macht. Ich sehe hier auch keinen Grund für eine Zugangsbeschränkung.
stillhart (2026-03-03 22:14:25+00:00): perfekter supercharger 😍
jkoe (2026-03-03 22:17:41+00:00): das habe ich auch mit den anderen HPC in Kleinostheim gemacht ;)  

Wobei ich der Meinung bin, dass da noch die Spannungs/Strominformationen fehlen. Bei den HYC*** habe ich das
jkoe (2026-03-03 22:20:51+00:00): ach ja, danke für das Lob :)
b-jazz (2025-11-21 07:56:03+00:00): Hey there nmac,

There's a bunch of problems with all of the roughs you drew and I'm hoping you can clean up the problems so that I don't have to.

When drawing golf course elements, you shouldn't ever have areas (roughs, fairways, greens, tees, etc) overlap/intersect each other. Yours do in a lot of places. 

You are also putting several adjoining areas together to form larger logical areas, but this is problematic as well. It's better to draw the entire area instead as one big area and not neighboring areas.

If your big area needs to exclude something (like you have a giant area but a lake in the middle), you can use a multipolygon relation to describe the outer boundary and the inner exclusion area. The wiki on openstreetmap.org can help explain those to you.

Please let me know if you have any questions about this. I'd be happy to help you understand and reduce the problems with golf courses on the map. Thanks.
nmac85 (2025-11-21 16:44:58+00:00): will work on fixing them if you give me some time. need them to finish my project then i will
nmac85 (2025-11-21 17:19:54+00:00): I have removed rough mapping ...thanks for allowing me to get my project done and not  modifying my mapping while in process.
b-jazz (2025-11-21 17:31:11+00:00): Thanks nmac! Your quick turnaround is greatly appreciated.
eggie (2025-11-21 10:15:27+00:00): Dag wandel Appeltje,

Alle routerelaties zijn oke.

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2025-11-21 00:36:24+00:00): Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added tourism attraction, government office, and updated names for Check Point and Paseo Turístico Natural del Cerezo en flor"
NeisBot (2025-11-21 00:36:24+00:00): Hi JT-Elki, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #NoComment
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-26 19:21:08+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset 184663162

https://osm.org/changeset/184663162
user_5359 (2025-11-21 08:49:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please do not add the ‘building’ key to the property, but only to a building.
user_5359 (2025-11-21 08:51:00+00:00): By the way did you mean really addr:unit instead of addr:postcode?
TunnelHillRdResident (2025-11-21 09:12:55+00:00): No. I did not intend that. I am new to this and am simply trying to fix these local issues. Sorry
user_5359 (2025-11-21 09:30:19+00:00): Corrected! We are all human beings, and human beings make mistakes, even if they are not new. Have fun with OSM!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-26 19:21:17+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset 184663162

https://osm.org/changeset/184663162
ValidDistress (2025-11-22 12:01:45+00:00): Deleted this object. This seems to be a fake addition of an AED (operator lol, phone lol). Please do not add imaginary objects to the map or do not use the live map for testing purposes.
Wynndale (2025-11-21 08:23:45+00:00): Why did you remove the fax number from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1376766484?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-21 01:20:55+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Świętej Heleny":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226951058

"Łabowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326300074
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1452490650
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1452490651
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1452490652
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1452490653
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1452490656
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1452490661

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
msevilla00 (2026-01-05 21:14:46+00:00): Hola Arturo, si no me equivoco el puerto de navacerrad acomo estación de esquí ya no existe o no está en uso o sea que habría que eliminarlo/ponerlo como sin uso, no?
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2026-01-10 13:04:10+00:00): Hola, retiraron unos tramos en la parte suroeste, que ya he etiquetado debidamente, el resto sigue en activo, inmerso en litigios legales pero activo.

https://puertonavacerrada.com/
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-11-22 12:21:53+00:00): Hi!

Here the streets and sidewalks were aligned using official geodesic data. Please do not realign features using Bing or other aerial imagery, since most fo the time, they are not alilgned correctly and need an offset. Thanks!
ilias_ (2025-11-21 09:42:57+00:00): Hi, I think these barriers https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13260542858

are actually private instead of permissive. It's for the apartment complex, not the school.
TaklamakanDesert (2025-11-24 15:23:28+00:00): Hello ilias_! Thank you for reaching out. I will go ahead and change access=permissive tagging here to access=private and apply the tagging to (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445318085) as well. Happy mapping!
TriangleMaple (2025-11-21 01:10:26+00:00): Source: Changeset Comment (Survey)
dypa (2025-11-22 07:53:16+00:00): дублирование адреса https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174915534
Ozon OSM6 (2025-11-24 14:20:48+00:00): Здравствуйте! 
Спасибо большое за то, что поправили! 
Буду внимательнее.
jandar22 (2025-12-08 23:45:02+00:00): Hi, it looks like as part of your changeset you moved this node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1649972474) ~1500ft from its correct location, distorting the pedestrian path (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/775141614) and area attached to it. I assume this was inadvertent as it can happen when using the mouse to pan around if not careful. It looks like iD editor may have flagged the path as crossing other paths and buildings and you chose the option to tag it as a tunnel rather than revert the move. Please revert this change and review changes before saving in the future.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174930469
KennyDap (2025-11-26 07:33:10+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140495
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-11-21 13:08:58+00:00): Please read this thread on the Canadian forum before changing from light rail to subway. Please revert until a concensus is found. Thanks and have a nice day!

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/montreal-rem-labeling-as-light-metro/132047/27
Comino (2025-11-21 09:45:29+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
Glassman (2025-11-22 00:25:31+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174931850
Glassman (2025-11-22 00:25:43+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174931879
NeisBot (2025-11-21 06:59:05+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly.

In total, I detected 46 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
- https://osm.org/way/214089914 | crossings=28
- https://osm.org/way/600206492 | crossings=18

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174932158
NeisRevert (2025-11-23 14:03:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175027395
where the comment is: "Revert node dragging"
KennyDap (2025-11-26 07:32:53+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140484
jbcharron (2025-11-22 07:05:07+00:00): Bonjour,
Pour indiquer explicitement que c'est une clinique, il manque l'attribut healthcare=clinic https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:healthcare%3Dclinic
Bonne journée
user_23381312 (2025-11-22 09:32:53+00:00): merci beaucoup voilà c'est fait
user_5359 (2025-11-21 08:33:51+00:00): Hello! You write "Anza Center" but "ANZA AV". Please use always mixcase writing of names.
likeToTravel (2025-11-22 00:18:08+00:00): huh? idu
user_5359 (2025-11-27 09:40:57+00:00): I apologise: what does this reaction mean?
likeToTravel (2025-11-27 19:20:49+00:00): idu = I don't understand
user_5359 (2025-11-28 18:26:51+00:00): For the building, you write the name Anza in mixed upper and lower case letters. For the bike path, you use only capital letters (“ANZA AV”). I would like to know the reason why you write the name differently for the bike path (this is often interpreted as “aggressive”).
likeToTravel (2025-12-08 00:30:27+00:00): it is because in the lacounty website that is how it is named. i think its official
user_5359 (2025-12-08 05:59:54+00:00): We are not talking about the name of the path, but about the spelling. Please refer to the wiki https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Names; even the abbreviation is undesirable.
likeToTravel (2025-12-15 23:22:40+00:00): that is exactly how it is spelled on the lacounty website
user_5359 (2025-12-09 09:47:31+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.os.org/way/884516982. What is the mean of the the key railway:otc ? Did you mean railway:ctc?
RailandSea (2025-12-26 18:59:27+00:00): fixed it thanks for looking out on the typo
TadaiShaxia (2025-11-21 05:58:27+00:00): 점(다대수영장) 이동이 잘 안 되어서 점을 복사하고 삭제한 뒤 붙여넣기 했는데 괜찮은가요?
LuxuryCoop (2025-11-21 09:28:45+00:00): 기존 점의 역사(수정 이력)가 날아가기 때문에 권장되는 방법은 아니지만, 점 이동이 잘 안 되는 상황이라면 문제가 되지 않습니다. 점의 역사보다는 좌표가 훨씬 중요한 정보기도 하고요.
BCNorwich (2025-11-22 07:41:49+00:00): Please don't add fiction or duplicated highways to OSM.

Thanks & Regards Bernard.
ieguy3 (2025-11-21 06:17:13+00:00): https://pvtimes.com/news/stretch-of-u-s-95-being-moved-for-nevada-gold-mining-project-77459
NeisBot (2025-11-21 06:21:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-21 06:21:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Marnell Masonry Las Vegas masonry company"
NeisReview (2025-11-23 14:05:54+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174937963
eggie (2025-11-21 08:43:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback    Engelse tekst?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-11-21 08:55:47+00:00): Dag R van Baalen  Je kunt het beste op de adresnode bijtaggen.
Kijk ook in de wiki, want ook de aard van de instelling vermelden.
De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode.. visitor_centre toegevoegd. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-11-21 08:48:17+00:00): addr:city toegevoegd
NeisBot (2025-11-21 07:02:56+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly.

In total, I detected 21 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
- https://osm.org/way/40479178 | crossings=21

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174934917
CaptainCrunch (2025-12-06 20:20:25+00:00): Hi, du hast barrier=city_wall auf dem landuse=residential hinzugefügt, das kann nicht stimmen. Ich hab es wieder entfernt.
eggie (2025-11-21 08:47:13+00:00): addr:city toegevoegd
NeisBot (2025-11-21 06:56:53+00:00): Привет (⌐■_■), добро пожаловать в проект OSM и спасибо за твой вклад!

Чтобы сделать сотрудничество проще и помочь другим понять твои правки, лучше добавить краткое описание сделанных изменений. Ясные комментарии помогают сообществу следить за твоей работой и предоставлять более лучшую обратную связь. Ты можешь найти советы по написанию хороших комментариев здесь[1].
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi (⌐■_■), welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-11-21 06:56:55+00:00): Вот пример комментария на основе твоих правок карты: "Удален тег здания"
(Auto-translation)
---
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Removed building tag"
eggie (2025-11-21 08:46:05+00:00): Dag RVanBaalen,

De dubbele vermelding heb ik verwijderd. Alle info staat op de adresnode.
MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2025-11-21 07:02:58+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
- https://osm.org/way/1049581404 | crossings=7

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174935223
pitscheplatsch (2025-11-23 14:02:17+00:00): Has been corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174938539
LordGarySugar (2025-11-24 00:25:08+00:00): Hi, on all your edits I've had to remove aerialway=chair_lift as this can only be applied to chair lifts that have completed construction and are open. If you want these proposed lifts to appear on skimaps.org/openskimap.org, it's up to the developers there to support the correct 'lifecycle prefixes' - proposed:aerialway=chair_lift and construction:aerialway=chair_lift. This edit also removed some tags from a bus route in Salt Lake City, which have now been restored. If you have any questions, feel free to ask.
NeisBot (2025-11-21 07:24:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-21 07:24:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Business consulting service"
NeisReview (2025-11-23 14:00:50+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/175027284
p1230 (2025-12-11 21:27:31+00:00): Hi, die Gemeinde Wirdum ist jetzt mit zwei Relationen vertreten: 898637 und 19861886. Das ist ein Fehler, oder?
Ropino (2025-12-12 08:08:29+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis.
Da habe ich mich in JOSM wohl verklickt und statt die bestehende Relation zu bearbeiten ein Duplikat erzeugt.
Habe ich soeben korrigiert.