piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
luk323 (2024-01-06 01:47:00+00:00): okay Danke, ich hatte die verkersinsen auch eigentlich garnicht erstellt, sondern nur die position genauer angegeben. Was mich zurzeit noch ein bischen verwirrt ist, wenn ich die straßen um eine verkersinsel eintrage, muss ich sie dann in die jeweilige fahrtrichtung ale einbahnstraße angeben? Mit freundlichen Grüßen :)
silversurfer83 (2024-01-06 06:48:19+00:00): Moin

Sorry. Mein Fehler. Hab die Geschichte der Objekte nicht genau genug angesehen.

Aber ja, Straßenabschnitte, die nur in eine Richtung befahrbar sind, sind Einbahnstraßen. Dabei genau auf die Orientierung der Linie achten, da sich das Attribut auf diese Richtung bezieht.

Cheers
Silversurfer83
BunnyFluff (2024-01-03 21:33:30+00:00): This changeset was created over the course of 3 days. I requested somebody review it because of this reason, as I usually do not split up my work on changesets like this. Part of this was also created offline in JOSM so I also wanted to have it reviewed just in case it overrode anybody else's work
Romwriter (2024-02-03 12:15:55+00:00): Hallo taxi55, vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge. Magst Du zu meiner Frage unter https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4098213 eine Meinung äußern?
Dimitar155 (2024-07-14 08:55:37+00:00): Здравей Тони, връщам изтрития връх, защото съществува според регистъра на географските имена. Местността със същото име се намира в северна посока (южно от https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159149399).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153921285
APneunzehn74 (2025-04-22 16:20:13+00:00): Hallo, https://www.openstreetmap.org/?#map=18/49.490154/11.475155&layers=C hier gibt es einen Hinweis das der Weg nicht mehr existiert. Kannst du dazu etwas beitragen.
Danke
Sraumf (2024-01-03 21:41:04+00:00): Actual road closure and demolishion of bridge will begin tommorrow, but road closure will be too short to map
JeroenHoek (2024-01-04 09:16:32+00:00): Pas op: je verplaatst in Groningen een AED-apparaat van het station naar een aanlegsteiger. Als dit de bedoeling is, dat moet dat wel in een aparte changeset. Probeer bewerkingen zoveel mogelijk bij elkaar te houden.
PlayGuide (2024-01-03 22:55:12+00:00): Super cartographie du parc, bravo, et merci ! Et puis tant qu'à faire : bonne année aussi !
waterced (2024-01-04 14:36:35+00:00): Pas de quoi! et bonne année à toi aussi, ;)
kabelhaai (2025-07-12 01:50:46+00:00): Dag Lorenz, bent u zeker dat het nieuwe gebouw nr 77 is? Dit bestaat niet op lara/GRB. Het gebouw aan de overkant is blijkbaae 77.
canfe (2024-01-04 17:20:25+00:00): way 1236677468 non penso sia una tomba storica.
Hai letto la wiki sul valore historic?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145856515
canfe (2024-01-04 17:22:09+00:00): Per quanto possibile sarebbe bene non cancellare l'esistente bensì modificarlo fino a dargli nuova forma in modo da preservarne l'history
way 1236711196
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145856515
canfe (2024-01-04 17:23:37+00:00): Anche questo edificio che hai unito, sembrerebbe essere diviso come precedentemente mappato
way 542300531
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145856515
boulton_zak (2024-01-05 05:38:10+00:00): Hello Warin61,

I think it is quite obvious that you have never visited this reserve as your edits are incorrect and it is clear that they were based purely on government data and aerial imagery. Government data and aerial imagery can be outdated or inaccurate so it is best not to edit places unless you have visited them or you have local knowledge
Warin61 (2024-01-05 05:50:11+00:00): The government date is official. It includes legal easements. My experience is that the government date is reliable. Boundaries cannot be accurately obtained for imagery or casual observation. 

More? Even Parks Vic who run the park and must know the boundaries so don't go messing with others property agree with the CAPAD data .. see https://www.parks.vic.gov.au/-/media/project/pv/main/parks/documents/visitor-guides-and-publications/the-pines-flora-and-fauna-reserve/the-pines-flora-and-fauna-reserve-visitor-guide.pdf?rev=799d555f1b4742e992d9eca40684ab5d

I would suggest you talk to a parks person about your impression of where the park boundaries are ..
TheSwavu (2024-01-07 09:52:15+00:00): Hi Folks,

Well this is an interesting one. I eventually found the gazettal and based on VicMap Property most of allotment 2086 (https://production-detailed-report-pdf.s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/Allot-2086-Parish-Of-Frankston-(ID216301107)-Detailed-Property-Report.pdf) is missing in the ParkRes dataset. I've adjusted the boundaries to match.

 boulton_zak could you check the location of the new SES building. Based on the Property data and what I can see on Sentinel I think it's a bit to the west of where it is now.

Thanks, and happy mapping.
TheSwavu (2024-01-07 10:16:03+00:00): I just noticed that the Esri imagery has the new SES building on it at low zoom.
Warin61 (2024-01-08 09:03:59+00:00): HI,
The planning zones report  https://production-planning-report-pdf.s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/Allot-2086-Parish-Of-Frankston-(ID216301107)-Vicplan-Planning-Property-Report.pdf  suggest that some of the area is under local government control while some is 'Public park and recreation/conservation reserve' ... I think the later is the Vic Parks bit .. while the local government would be a separate thing... 

????
Warin61 (2024-01-08 09:14:18+00:00): Lot 40N does not appear to be part of the gazetted area for The Pines park .. 

Above .. I was wrong in attributing it to local gove.. PUZ7 = 'Public use - other public use' whatever that means (probably equivalent to 'miscellaneous' !).
Warin61 (2024-01-08 09:23:14+00:00): Ok...
40N not part of the original gazette, but the property report puts it with some of the original gazetted areas. So that is 'good', the property report/planning property report are dated from when I accessed it ... meaning it is upto date' as far as they know.
TheSwavu (2024-01-08 10:23:16+00:00): 40N is the street number not the lot number. The legal boundaries are based on allotments not the street address.
NeisBot (2024-01-06 00:19:49+00:00): Hi Röörikki 👋

your recent changeset has been marked due to a temporary or permanent block from further map edits. 

If you have any questions or if there's anything you'd like to discuss regarding the mapping, feel free to reach out! We're here to help. 

Best regards, 🤖

Details https://osm.org/user_blocks/15551
#ContributorHasBeenBlocked
Allison P (2024-01-17 08:26:58+00:00): I may be addicted. I'm up to 3000 now.
VLD549 (2024-01-17 16:43:30+00:00): Hi, could you indicate how you got to the name change from Grootebeek to Grootebeek - Porrebeek?
The source you provide indicates it to be Grootebeek. 
https://www.geopunt.be/?viewer=Waterlopen_app%2Findex.html
Thank you!
Rik007 (2024-01-19 03:51:39+00:00): Sources name:
https://topomapviewer.ngi.be/?l=nl&baselayer=crossborder.topo&x=624828.50&y=686305.38&zoom=8
https://www.natuurpunt.be/natuurgebied/porrebeekvallei-en-paddebeekvallei
VLD549 (2024-01-24 16:34:10+00:00): Thank you.
Marek-M (2024-01-04 08:53:24+00:00): W którym miejscu pomiędzy wysepkami masz rozdzielenie ruchu?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/54.46251/17.01093
https://i.imgur.com/Tro5Ao5.png

Edycja nie jest prawidłowa.
tyfi (2024-01-03 23:41:49+00:00): I renamed the way from "Trenton Post Office" to "United States Post Office" for consistency with others (that's what it usually says on the building, but Bing StreetSide isn't available here). Feel free to switch it back, though.
moje_konto (2024-01-04 01:50:16+00:00): www.openstreetmap.org/way/180722484

hgv=no
hgv:conditional=none @ delivery

Zmieniłeś na:
hgv=destination
maxweightrating:hgv=3.5

Nowa wartość wskazuje, że wjazd do celu z limitem 3.5. Nie jest to prawidłowe, wjazd do posesji jest bez limitu.

www.openstreetmap.org/way/172187063
Albo tu zmieniłeś municipal na destination. A tabliczka zezwala na wjazd tylko obsłudze mieszkańców.

Te uproszczenia zatracają informacje.
moje_konto (2024-01-04 03:00:20+00:00): Na razie przywróciłem poprzednie, hgv:conditional są na podstawie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions

Można się zastanawiać nad lepszymi formami zapisu tych znaczników, ale nie powinno się upraszczać. Jeśli wjazd jest tylko dla obsługi, to lepsze jest hgv=no + warunkowy, bo nikogo nawigacja źle nie skieruje. Zmiana na ogólny wjazd do celu może kogoś zmylić.

Też nieoznaczone przejście w miejscu gdzie się przechodzi mogło być, miejsce łączenia się ścieżki z drogą takim jest. Niby można uznać, że wynika to z samego połączenia drogi ze ścieżką, ale można zaznaczyć wprost. Pewną niekonsekwencją jest, że skasowałeś takie nieoznaczone przejścia, a za razem dodałeś kilka maxspeed na living_street, a ono wynika z typu drogi, więc jest opcjonalne.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-04 00:10:25+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11484040408

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-04 00:10:24+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11484004233

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Scout Jens (2024-01-04 09:37:56+00:00): Warum hast Du die Religion und den Namen entfernt? Ich bin inzwischen vorsichtig mit den Osmose Warnungen. Da ist viel zweifelhaftes dabei in meinen Augen.
george1201 (2024-01-04 12:33:42+00:00): Osmose hatte bemängelt, dass bestimmte Eigenschaften (z.B. name, religion) doppelt vergeben waren. Einmal am Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/108254641, ein weiteres Mal an der Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4151172. Das hat mich überzeugt, deswegen habe ich die Änderung gemacht.

Allerding muss ich dir zustimmen, mit dem Ergebnis bin ich ganz und gar nicht zufrieden. Der Name "Heilig Kreuz" wird jetzt nicht mehr in der Karte angezeigt. Was ist der Grund? Wie kann man es so machen, dass keine Eigenschaft doppelt vergeben wird, sie aber trotzdem angezeigt wird. Liegt es am Typ der Relation? Hast du eine Idee? So kann man es jedenfalls nicht lassen.
george1201 (2024-01-04 18:21:42+00:00): Ich hab's jetzt teilweise rückgängig gemacht. Name/Religion wieder ans Gebäude, dafür aber aus der Relation entfernt. Somit erscheint der Name wieder in der Karte und nichts ist doppelt.
Scout Jens (2024-01-10 12:09:51+00:00): So ist es besser. Vielen Dank!
SomeoneElse (2024-01-04 00:56:38+00:00): Going eastbound, the explicitly signed "cycle TPT" starts at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1761919#map=19/53.77773/-1.02742 (the sign as at the eastern end).  NCN65 is also signed over the same route, but the signs are not all in the same places.
SomeoneElse (2024-01-04 00:58:37+00:00): At https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1761919#map=20/53.77466/-1.02201 The TPT is signed for cyclists NE and for pedestrians SE.  "Camino Ingles to Santiago" followers (mainly foot) are signed along the cycle route.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-04 00:20:24+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6402591290

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-04 00:30:22+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11484054470

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
tastrax (2024-01-04 02:43:36+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.

For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  
I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM,

Cheers - Phil
NeisBot (2024-01-05 00:22:25+00:00): Hello Alfonso RG, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
MarWis84 (2024-01-04 04:14:25+00:00): I see you marked it as disused:shop=clothes but according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:shop this tag is for vacant places which would be incorrect thing to say. It's not vacant, it's just unknown based on given information.

I looked at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix and couldn't find a prefix for such situation so I'm guessing there shouldn't be any tag at all?
MxxCon (2024-01-04 04:22:32+00:00): You reported that the existing biz is no longer there. As such this POI was tagged like that, which exposes it to other apps to encourage people to fill in the missing info.
MxxCon (2024-01-04 04:30:30+00:00): I updated it to the current biz that's there.
woodpeck_repair (2024-01-09 21:21:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146081198 where the changeset comment is: undo undiscussed and large-scale deletions of paths not open to public - use access=private instead
RAC_UK (2024-01-20 09:09:43+00:00): Hi, is there any way when you delete nodes containing information you can move it onto the relevant way please.
Sforzando9500 (2024-01-26 11:36:54+00:00): Thanks for the reminder, I'm still learning how to do this. Is there a way to copy all the fields from one object to another in one go?
RAC_UK (2024-02-16 09:32:50+00:00): Not sure about Id. In JOSM it’s ctrl-c to copy then shift-ctrl-v on the way to paste.
arjunaraoc (2024-01-08 23:45:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my update: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146046582
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145860270
dknelson9876 (2024-01-22 18:50:46+00:00): Hi mbeyerle, what about this link do you think needs to be resurveyed?
mbeyerle (2024-01-22 18:57:41+00:00): I think turn lane taggings should be added and the dual carriageway should not start so far south because the divided part of the road (physical concrete barrier) is farther north than mapping at present indicates
mbeyerle (2024-01-22 18:58:45+00:00): I might be looking at stale imagery though, if that's the case please let me know!
dknelson9876 (2024-01-22 20:50:18+00:00): The imagery is up to date for what this intersection looks like. I just think it's gonna be awkward to represent both the divided median and the left turn, either as it is now or in the style that aweech used at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1200669910. Previously this intersection did not show that left turns were possible, and to me the way it is now, with the division moved a little far to make the left turn smoother, is preferable.
mbeyerle (2024-01-23 17:43:20+00:00): I've made a few additional edits, creating what I believe to be the most elegant solution -- let me know if agree with mapping as per https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146601870
dknelson9876 (2024-01-23 18:10:34+00:00): It's not my favorite, since to a person just looking at the map, they're unlikely to notice the nuance and think that a left turn is not allowed, but I'm willing to accept it because I don't think that there is an optimal way to map this intersection.
5m4u9 (2024-01-05 08:01:54+00:00): Hi, thanks for improving the area. 

Generally, in Cochabamba the names of the roads are preceded by the type of road. e.g.: "Calle Jove Rancho".
arjunaraoc (2024-01-07 01:12:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Please upload changes in nearby area as a separate changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145860637
Jrachi (2024-01-04 07:15:00+00:00): Perché continui ad inserire i tag ref dove è già presente una relazione?

Ivo
Jrachi (2024-01-04 07:27:07+00:00): Se conosci le "regole" di OSM saprai anche citare a memoria le pagine wiki dove è scritto che una strada debba avere il ref. Il ref è mantenuto dove non esiste (ancora) una relazione route, altrimenti è solo mappare per il rendering.
E perché "correggi" in primary solo la parte centrale? Forse perché è più larga in quel tratto? E rimane tertiary dove è stretta?
Conosci le regole che parlano di gerarchia stradale?

Ivo
Jrachi (2024-01-04 07:29:28+00:00): E smettila di fare il salvatore!!
Ieri io e altri user hanno passato ore a ripristinare le relazioni di diverse SP della zona. Tutte devastate dai tuoi "appropriati" interventi che vorrebbero sanare delle situazioni scandalose.
Così scandalose che funzionavano benissimo prima.
Ivo
Fedurli (2024-01-04 15:39:06+00:00): Le regole della gerarchia stradale le conosco molto bene. Infatti la mappatura corretta prevede il "primary" tra la fine del RA10 e Nole (per caratteristiche infrastrutturale e località di collegamento) mentre "secondary" nel tratto Ciriè-Lanzo (per gli stessi motivi). Tutte le altre strade della zona (eccetto la SP1) sono "tertiary" in quanto non soddisfano i requisiti per essere "secondary".

Il tag "ref" va messo ANCHE in presenza di una relazione con tag "ref". Il tag "ref" sul segmento stradale e il tag "ref" sulla relazione sono due cose distinte. Vedi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:ref
Rimuovendo il tag "ref" dal segmento, ometti un requisito richiesto per la corretta mappatura, oltre al fatto che nella mappa risultano tutte strade senza nome, senza numero ecc. (e no, non c'entra niente questo con il mappare per il render..)
Jrachi (2024-01-07 18:54:02+00:00): Scusa, ma in quella pagina parla del ref.
Non dice se l'usarlo o meno sia importante per una way. E neanche necessario.
Non so, forse in quelle 7 righe è scritto qualcosa che mi sfugge...
E la pagina è generica su ref, prende esempio dalle strade dedicate al traffico veicolare e non cita, ad esempio le relazioni hiking, anzi non parla neanche di relazioni.
Mi piacerebbe capire se davvero prendi ispirazione da questa pagina per la ferrea posizione che mantieni.
arjunaraoc (2024-01-07 01:07:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my updates: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145976234
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145860747
NieWnen (2024-01-04 17:50:41+00:00): Proszę, postaraj się lepiej opisywać zestawy zmian.

Jakie jest źródło tego, że maxspeed tam wynosi 30?
Na pewno nie jest to "Geoportal 2: Orthophotomap (latest aerial imagery) (WMTS)".
Jrachi (2024-01-04 07:13:20+00:00): Parlando di scempi, direi che sei in buona compagnia.
Scherzi a parte. Sarei anche d'accordo che sono presenti un negozio di alimentari ed un prontuario farmaceutico. Bar non ne ho mai visti, se mi dici dov'è vado a farci un giro oggi con la passeggiata quotidiana.
Ma perché insisti a definire quartieri dei piccoli borghi o meglio delle case sparse?
E non preoccuparti di dire "un utente" cita tranquillamente il mio nome (Ivo) e .

Ivo
arjunaraoc (2024-01-07 01:02:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my improvements: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145976183
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145860783
woodpeck (2024-01-10 09:26:10+00:00): The same user has performed similar deletions again which I reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146081198, and sent them a 0-hour block message.
JeroenHoek (2024-01-04 07:27:58+00:00): foot=use_sidepath, niet foot=no.
JeroenHoek (2024-01-06 19:28:33+00:00): Kijk je hier nog even naar?
os-emmer (2024-03-10 12:19:18+00:00): Hi ezuplkqrhp,
you mapped here spmething using emergency=disaster_response before the proposal for this tag got approved. Can you confirm that this object still matches the definition for this tag?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11484310471
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=disaster_response
Quixlian (2024-03-15 04:32:39+00:00): I don't think it matches what I had in mind anymore. I've already changed the tag. Thank you.
os-emmer (2024-03-15 16:44:28+00:00): Thank you for your help.
arjunaraoc (2024-01-08 23:43:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145861641
arjunaraoc (2024-01-08 23:41:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
Check my update: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146046536

Please upload changes to nearby areas as a separate changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145861782
tyfi (2024-01-04 02:46:01+00:00): I bumped the state route to tertiary out of habit, really, but I don't feel like unclassified is a good fit anyway. If it shouldn't be tertiary, just let me know
arjunaraoc (2024-01-05 01:46:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my cleanup vide https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145902899
Happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145861818
arjunaraoc (2024-01-08 23:35:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my update: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146046448

Upload changes to nearby areas as a separate changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145861857