piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mirror176 (2024-04-29 23:14:16+00:00): Franchise is closed, but they didn't remove the building on their way out; can we undo and just remove relevant tags, maybe changing 'name' to 'disused:name' to avoid possible accidental retagging?
mirror176 (2024-04-29 23:21:46+00:00): Correcting myself, franchise 'location' is closed, while that franchise has other locations active still. I can try to undo and correct if outcome is desired. It had been more than a week since I was last there and location was definitely closed with name removed from building and sign
Jalium (2024-04-30 00:12:40+00:00): No worries. I added it back. I updated some of the data. Feel free to check it and make sure I got it right :)
mirror176 (2024-05-01 20:53:34+00:00):   There are ways to undo edits too; keeps more historical content and reuses existing nodes with their exact existing locations but isn't something to stress over.
  You had both amenity and disused:amenity. I removed first as it implies a restaurant people could actively go to. Second could likely go but does seem to match the 'disused:' tag purpose so I wouldn't call it wrong; if they modified the insides to not be restaurant ready then we would call it wrong.
  I changed disused:operator to disused:name as name is something people would be more likely to run across in old sources like street imagery and consider adding first. I use it as a "please don't carelessly add it back" and don't expect Culivers to reopen here. Realistically we could likely do a single disused=yes to minimize tag clutter while getting the point across that it exists but isn't used. 
  Not familiar with end_date nor could I make any useful sense of it for openstreetmap use so I didn't touch it. Don't know if any consumers process this tag to disable amentiy=, remove building=, etc. in any useful way.
  Thanks for mapping.
akimapbuilder (2024-04-23 07:29:03+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since it overlaps with the existing road.
galen8183 (2025-05-04 01:55:15+00:00): This did not fix anything, please don't add incorrect data only to silence validator warnings

The service way passes *under* part of the building, not over it
galen8183 (2025-05-04 03:55:50+00:00): Corrected in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165783140
Swihail (2025-05-05 02:04:57+00:00): Hi galen8183, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
Swihail (2025-05-06 01:22:35+00:00): Hi galen8183, I was unsure about the deletion of the layer tag that time so had submitted another changeset in May 2024 to undo my edits and restore the previous tags. Here is that changeset for your reference: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150991177#map=19/43.477325/-80.533681. Thank you for making the corrections here. I will make sure to follow this convention on my future edits.
Glassman (2024-04-30 20:30:02+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150372053
Baloo Uriza (2024-06-20 23:32:12+00:00): You tagged a turning loop as a mini-roundabout.  Oklahoma has up to 3 mini-roundabouts, all in Okmulgee if they were ever installed; mini roundabouts don't have a physical central island, whereas a cul de sac with an island would be a turning loop.
ArgyleZombie (2024-06-23 22:13:04+00:00): All right. I'll fix it.  I never read the wiki page for mini-roundabouts, until now.  I was just going off the example of where someone else had put some into a neighborhood about 10 miles southeast of this location.  I will fix those too.
ArgyleZombie (2024-06-23 22:17:30+00:00): Looks like you already fixed this one for me.  I went and fixed the other two that someone else had put in the other neighborhood.
Allison P (2024-04-24 15:57:49+00:00): Thank you for adding the building with detailed info! Just two points: addr:state=* takes the postal abbreviation of the state, not the full name. In the U.S., it is far more common to use building=detached than building=house house=detached. Try using the "Detached House" preset.
Baloo Uriza (2024-06-14 20:52:53+00:00): I made further refinements.  Might take a look at the StreetComplete app next time you're in that area to complete the mall.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150374316
Baloo Uriza (2024-06-14 16:27:14+00:00): Is this park listed on a city website someplace?  Looks like an undeveloped cul de sac.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150374421
Road–Runner (2024-04-23 22:26:56+00:00): Die Adresse war hier bereits vorhanden.
MxxCon (2024-04-23 05:42:33+00:00): Hello.
It seems like this building already has this address tagged. Could you elaborate why are you mapping this info again?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150374505
KingKull2112 (2024-04-23 06:14:14+00:00): The buildings nearby also have the same pins, I added this for consistency
GrabMY_ainayusof (2024-04-29 02:01:03+00:00): Hi PusurRiver. Based on recent MBMB post, a changes has been made to this particular area. Oneway no longer applied to this road. So I'm reverting it back to previous edit ya. 

Post for reference: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/ZYNa35St3n3hogis/?mibextid=WC7FNe
PusurRiver (2024-04-30 14:35:18+00:00): Hello GrabMY_ainayusof, 
Thank you for reaching out. Do you know whether these changes will last longer than a few weeks or whether they could be foreseeably permanent? Otherwise, this modeling could only be temporary, which is not ideal for users that download and rely on offline data. If you have additional information or resources you could share on these changes, that would be great!
GrabMY_ainayusof (2024-05-15 03:19:23+00:00): Hi. Sorry to respond you late. The changes occurs as per City Council plan and it is recently update. If you look into any recent images of the street, you can detect newly drawn road surface marking and permanent structure built in the area.

I believe it is permanent until further notice from MBMB. Theres bunch of infos provided in the city council social media pages and I'd suggest you to stay tuned on the pages for recent updates. :)
PusurRiver (2024-05-17 17:26:18+00:00): Thank you for the helpful information and taking the time to explain this to me. Hope you have a great day!
NK Whitla (2024-04-23 05:42:04+00:00): Note: I hadn't realized that I started an edit of the CU Denver business School 2nd floor earlier that got included in this changeset. This was accidental, but figure I should add it to the notes.
julcnx (2024-04-23 06:29:11+00:00): welcome to OSM, and thank you for you edits! one small tip, you could add a more descriptive comment e.g. "added a temple", "realign a road". it makes it easier for others to understand your change. for more info see the link below. keep it up! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,edited%20and%20the%20sources%20used.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150375869
mavl (2024-04-23 13:41:55+00:00): Здравствуйте. Принято указывать номер дома как "2А к2".  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
Selnara (2024-04-24 05:23:24+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо, учту это)
tastrax (2024-04-24 04:13:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.  FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Metzor (2024-04-25 15:33:30+00:00): Hallo Nurgut!

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Schön, dass du mithilfst die (Karten)Daten zu verbessern. Hier in den Diskussionen können wir dem Autor eines Änderungssatzes Fragen stellen oder Tipps geben, wie manches besser gemappt werden könnte. Dabei muss man nicht immer einer Meinung sein, aber zumindest aus Höflichkeit antworten :-)

Mich hat ein Qualitätssicherungstool auf deinen Änderungsdatensatz aufmerksam gemacht: Der Bundesstraße über den Feldberg hast du einen scharfen Knick verpasst. Das fand das Tool unglaubwürdig ;-)

Ich denke, jeder hier hat schon mal ausversehen einen Knoten verrückt und es nicht bemerkt. Also kein Problem, solange du dir dieses Risikos nun bewusst bist.

Hier kannst du es nachvollziehen:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/275414967

Wenn du auf "show more" klickst, zeigt es alle Orte an, an denen der Knoten zuvor lag. Das rechts unten warst du. ;-)
Ich habe den Knoten schon wieder zurück geschoben.

Ich vermute, bei diesem Baum ist dir das gleiche passiert:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/3997854762

Falls ja: Schiebst du ihn bitte wieder zurück?

Zu deinem 1. bzw. 3. Änderungssatz hätte ich auch noch einen Tipp/eine Nachfrage, falls du interessiert bist.

Ansonsten vermute ich, dass du das Wiki und die Community schon kennst?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Comparison_of_editors
https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Viel Spaß beim Mappen und schöne Grüße
Metzor
Nurgut (2024-04-26 05:43:04+00:00): Hallo Metzor
vielen Dank für deinen Hinweis,ja werde ich drauf achten.
Ich bin Vorsitzender des Vereins der die Burg Hohenkrähen gepachtet hat und mein Ziel war es eigentlich hauptsächlich die Daten für die Bubatzkarte zu verbessern,bei meiner Recherche bin ich dann auf die Jugendherberge am Feldberg gekommen.
Den Baum finde ich nicht mehr :-(
Werde zukünftig besser drauf acht geben was ich speichere.
Metzor (2024-04-26 06:12:14+00:00): Hallo Nurgut,

Ich habe den Baum zurück geschoben:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150521783#map=18/47.88683/8.13184

Wenn du die Umrisse kennst, könntest du den Jugendcampingplatz auch als Fläche zeichnen. Das dürfte die Abstände noch vergrößern ;-)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150492725

Hier hast du eingetragen, dass die Schule 0 Stockwerke hat, also bereits das Erdgeschoss Dachschräge hat...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118523803

Viele Grüße
Metzor
woodpeck (2024-04-23 08:10:24+00:00): Hello there alfred476, please be more detailed in your changset comments - "revert" is not enough, we want to know why. Also, your account is only a few weeks old and you're already wielding the JOSM reverter tool so you're clearly someone who has another, older, OSM account. Why have you created this secondary account for your reverts - do you have reason to believe the reverts are contentious? Has there been a community discussion about this?
Filip009 (2024-05-18 17:49:54+00:00): It looks like it is a bot, which reverts all changesets, that change some boundary.
eggie (2024-04-23 07:25:45+00:00): Dag Nicolia   Met je actie heb je wel een knooppuntwandelroute 61 63 onderbroken. Hoe loopt die route dan nu precies?

MVG
eggie
NicoliaZ (2024-04-23 07:31:50+00:00): wandelroute hersteld in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150379724
eggie (2024-04-23 07:36:53+00:00): Top.... 
Ik heb nog wel even de route gesorteerd. Editor iD is een onding en zet je ingeplaatste deel helemaal achterin de relatie.
Met editor JOSM kan het wel.

MVG
eggie
Mb_651 (2024-04-23 09:43:25+00:00): Der Änderungskommentar ist recht ungenau. Denke SC Egglfing Stadium verbessert wäre akkurater gewesen.
skyper (2024-04-23 19:02:06+00:00): Hello Swihail,
why are you deleting the `layer=*` here? They seem to be perfectly right. Additionally, I wonder how you can add a `level=*` from aerial images.
There seems to be a problem in understanding the task and/or within the instructions, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/102994/4 and follow-ups (which is about Germany but also valid here).
I kindly ask you to stop working on "Fixed building and highway intersection" for now and talk to your instructor plus, please, review all your previous changes regarding the task (as this one is only an example) and fix or revert them prior to continuing.
Thanks and regards,
skyper
Swihail (2024-04-24 10:45:10+00:00): Hi Skyper, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you. Meanwhile, I'll stop working on Fixed building and highway intersection.
Swihail (2024-04-26 11:15:05+00:00): Hi Skyper, 
I referred wiki page and replaced layer tag with level tag for highway. We understand your point, we are going to make some changes to the business logic and we will be reaching out to you for your feedback. In the meantime we will be reverting the updates that we made back to the previous setting.
tekim (2024-04-23 13:52:31+00:00): Hello, Thanks for your edit to the map. I see you cited Google Street View as one of your sources.  Unfortunately, when editing OpenStreetMap we are not allowed to use Google Street View due to Google's Terms of Service.
tekim (2024-04-23 13:52:50+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150397063
aTarom (2024-04-24 06:34:25+00:00): Hola, cuando puedas revisa estos tags
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1KpI
> Shape_Area
> Shape_Leng
> DISTRITO
Saludos disculpa brevedad
Davileci (2024-04-24 07:58:26+00:00): Hola:
He quitado las etiquetas, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150429672; aunque no está claro que esto prospere, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105930317
¡Gracias por tu atención!
Реdактор (2024-04-29 03:18:38+00:00): Дорога Габукай- Чабанов это дорога регионального значения, надо вернуть
Stalker61 (2024-05-02 16:23:19+00:00): А с каких пор в хутора статус автодороги стали определять по региональным НПА? Не крутовато ли будет поднимать статус до primary?
Stalker61 (2024-05-02 16:23:58+00:00): Да еще и в тупик.
Реdактор (2024-05-02 16:26:13+00:00): Да тут не дело в том куда ведёт дорога, просто если углубиться в тему дорог и найти перечень дорог Краснодарского края там будет дорога регионального занятия Габукай-Чабанов
Реdактор (2024-05-02 16:27:13+00:00): Ой Адыгеи
Реdактор (2024-05-02 16:27:22+00:00): Извиняюсь
Stalker61 (2024-05-02 17:09:10+00:00): Я в курсе содержания данного документа https://docs.cntd.ru/document/439033275
В OSM классификация (статус) автодорог определяется трафиком и административным уровнем соединяющим НП. Я знаком с дорогами муниципального значения гораздо выше статусом, чем primary.
NeisBot (2024-04-29 07:34:03+00:00): Hello Alex_FZS, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Friendly_Ghost (2024-04-23 16:25:38+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150404676
silversurfer83 (2024-04-23 08:13:55+00:00): Moin Klaus :)

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich das mal jemand ansieht.

Du hast Recht. Dieser disc golf course könnte ein wenig Liebe gebrauchen. Falls du Vor Ort Kenntnisse hast (oder einfach Lust hast, das mal anzufassen), kann ich dir diesen Artikel im Wiki empfehlen, in dem erklärt wird, wie ein Disc Golf course analog zu einem klassischen Golfkurs erfasst werden kann:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Ddisc_golf_course

Bei Fragen immer raus damit

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150379311
eggie (2024-04-23 07:46:43+00:00): Nicolia..  
Tip  Kijk eens naar editor JOSM
 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047

Dan kun je ook routes goed bewerken.

MVG
eggie
NicoliaZ (2024-04-23 07:59:28+00:00): thanks!
silversurfer83 (2024-04-23 07:52:42+00:00): Hi :)

ich hab die Linie mal mit einem anderen Editor angefasst und entfernt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150380413

Um eine neue Relation mit einem vorhanden Weg / Straße zu erzeugen, wählst du im Editor (bei dir vermutlich iD, der im Browser eingebaute Editor) einen Abschnitt aus und scrollst ganz links bis nach unten zum Teil "Relationen" und klickst dann auf das "+" und erzeugst eine neue Relation. Da kannst du dann alle weiteren Abschnitte des Rundweges hinzufügen. Die Wege, über die die Route verläuft, sind ja alle schon vorhanden. Du musst sie nur in diese Relation packen.
Ich habe damit leider selbst noch nicht groß Erfahrung, kann dir also im Zweifel nur das Wiki und die Suchmaschine deiner Wahl empfehlen. Oder frag im Forum, dort wird idR auch recht zügig geholfen.

viel Erfolg :)

(irgendwann lerne ich das auch noch mal ordentlich, wie man so einen schöne Relation zusammenklimpert)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150379899
Clemens35041 (2024-04-23 08:00:33+00:00): Hallo  silversurfer83,
danke für Deine Kommentare, die bringen mich echt weiter. Ich habe es doch geschafft, die Linie zu löschen, damit müsste der falsche angelegte Wanderweg weg sein. Langsam steige ich hier bei den Relationen auch dahinter, ich mache gerade eine Proberunde.
Grüße
Clemens35041
silversurfer83 (2024-04-23 08:11:03+00:00): Freut mich, wenn ich helfen kann und wenn dadurch die Datengrundlage besser wird :)

Im Hinterland müsste ich eigentlich auch mal eine Runde drehen
Glassman (2024-04-30 20:30:29+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150380068
Tomas Straupis (2024-04-23 08:18:51+00:00): Mokykla (amenity=school) nėra landuse, nereikia „iš po“ mokyklos nuimti žemėnaudos landuse=residential.
aleksaJov (2024-04-24 07:20:44+00:00): Hello あんこ, I removed tag natural=coastline and added area=yes. If there is a part of river promenade and is for pedestrians, there can be added additional tag highway=footway.

Regards, Aleksandar
user_8655426 (2024-04-28 11:53:42+00:00): Reverted
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150614890

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:破壊行為

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:natural%3Dbeach
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150380437
eggie (2024-04-23 08:04:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Helaas is het kunstwerkje van de voorgaande mapper grondig vernield.  Ik draai je bijdrage even terug. Wat was je bedoeling?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-04-23 08:08:03+00:00): Reverted by changeset #150381137

Elk begin is moeilijk. Beter niet beginnen om het werk van voorgaande mappers te veranderen.
MVG
eggie
literan (2024-04-23 18:06:47+00:00): неверный формат адреса, пропущен пробел. Ознакомьтесь и не допускайте ошибки:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
larchmap (2024-04-24 12:31:35+00:00): is this being replaced with another land use?
larchmap (2024-04-24 12:35:07+00:00): / was the whole polygon meant to be deleted?
tms13 (2024-04-29 04:05:40+00:00): Which polygon?  There's a few in the change.
Certainly there was some Merkaartor shenanigans involving an unreferenced way.  I'll look at fixing it up manually.
tms13 (2024-04-29 04:06:06+00:00): That was somewhere in the southwest of this change, I think.
osmviborg (2024-04-23 09:14:03+00:00): Offset fejlen er på dette sted ca. 75 cm. Du kan kompensere for fejlen i menuen 'Luftfoto-offset'.
HellMap (2024-04-23 09:25:23+00:00): Hello,

I moved the point to the new location for you. Note that just changing the address won't actually move the point itself.

Cheers
Zaķis (2024-04-23 10:10:58+00:00): Hi. Im sorry. but I still dont see Grāpis in new location. What I have done wrong?
HellMap (2024-04-23 11:47:45+00:00): The map takes a few minutes to update, so you won't see it at once. By now, you can force your browser to refresh the cached map images with Ctrl + F5 or your browser's equivalent.

If you click the link https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11070676996 you can see it's at the new (approximate) location.
peanuthole (2025-04-09 06:56:32+00:00): Hola, como apunte, me he dado cuenta de que Petilla de Aragón se te ha escapado cuando debería estar incluida. Lo editaría yo, pero con iD ediciones tan tochas se escapan de mis posibilidades :)
osminng (2025-04-14 05:53:47+00:00): ¡Hola!

Gracias, me alegro de que hayas encontrado este problema. Ya está arreglado (en JOSM), Petilla de Aragón también forma parte de la Región Estadística del Nordeste.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164921581
maps_not_naps (2024-05-03 19:02:22+00:00): Hello Faizan Ahmed,
I noticed that you have been modeling roads around Ayub Gabool Goth. Based on publicly available imagery, many of these ways are not visible while others seem to be classified higher than what’s in accordance with the OSM wiki. The OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Roads) indicates that secondary roads are mostly used to link towns and primary roads connect larger towns that don’t qualify as a motorway or a trunk. With that in mind, I have adjusted these roads to follow OSM Wiki guidelines but please reach out if you have further information or resources regarding your updates in this area.
Regards,
maps_not_naps
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-23 08:50:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11840763070

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Friendly_Ghost (2024-04-23 16:24:25+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150404629
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-23 08:50:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299981172

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-10 17:04:57+00:00): poprawione
ivanbranco (2024-04-27 22:40:40+00:00): Hi Florian,

is this really a beach? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1275210444/history
Friendly_Ghost (2024-04-23 09:14:04+00:00): Vandalising the map out of spite is a quick way to attract the attention of the DWG. You would do well to change your workflow and to follow SomeoneElse's advice.
user_9221753 (2024-04-23 09:30:50+00:00): Vandalism is something that stays permanently.
I fully explained that I temporarily use these circles so that to allign the 2ways of the highway, then after allingment I delete whatever is not needed to exist.
Is that clear?
Friendly_Ghost (2024-04-23 16:23:50+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150404600
Friendly_Ghost (2024-04-23 16:23:06+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150404433
Friendly_Ghost (2024-04-23 16:17:38+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150404373
Friendly_Ghost (2024-04-23 16:16:49+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150404335
MxxCon (2024-04-26 03:23:33+00:00): Hello.
could you please elaborate on what do you mean by "until 2017"? So after 2017 there are no signs giving this segment a name?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150384330