piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
YomanNH (2026-02-05 09:29:41+00:00): Nie mapujemy przyszłości. Wycofałem bzdury.
Tatfahren (2026-03-06 12:13:21+00:00): Bei dem gelöschten Weg handelte es sich laut Luftbild um den Pfad auf dem "Deich". Existiert der Weg noch? In dem Fall würde ich den Weg wiederherstellen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178108236
NeisBot (2026-02-05 06:14:13+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13524801060 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Law office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 06:24:30+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178437928
(No visible changes after review)
notmyproblem1 (2026-02-04 19:08:23+00:00): ecco cosa succede quando tocchi la bbox vecchia di la spezia
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:06:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
JessAk71 (2026-02-04 19:22:39+00:00): Forgot the changeset comment: added building outlines.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-06 02:34:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1474244850

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
JanezPavelZebovec (2026-07-09 19:23:04+00:00): These edits do not meet OSM mapping standards and constitute obvious vandalism. They include one or more of these: incorrect street names, incorrect road classifications, and other intentionally disruptive edits. They are therefore being reverted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
eggie (2026-02-04 20:46:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Константин Гам (2026-07-03 19:01:08+00:00): Вы отрисовали свою фантазию. Это остатки фундамента. Здание снесено лет 5 как. Проверяйте данные, по нескольким источникам.
Спасибо
Ozon_OSM11 (2026-07-06 15:05:48+00:00): Здравствуйте, спасибо, приму во внимание.
Fraxi (2026-02-05 08:39:09+00:00): In this changeset you deleted the main feature tags of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175632097, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175632085, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160244711, but updated information for them such as new name of the street and maximum speed limit. Are these segments really existing in the reality?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178110209
5m4u9 (2026-02-07 16:22:08+00:00): Hola, en qué otros mapas? de la alcaldía? porque si es de google o otros, hay que tener permiso sino estamos violando sus derechos protegidos....
Szymson (2026-02-04 20:16:12+00:00): Thanks
NeisBot (2026-02-05 06:14:15+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13356296620 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Hair Salon"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 06:24:31+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178437929
(No visible changes after review)
dankarran (2026-02-05 09:20:36+00:00): Hi KKIOM. Thanks for keeping it up to date. I think the tag you want is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dno rather than https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:closed?uselang=en
KKIOM (2026-02-05 23:06:54+00:00): Thanks, Dan - adjusted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
NeisBot (2026-02-05 06:14:16+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13072734855 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Air conditioning repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 06:24:34+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178437935
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 13:54:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178459361
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisBot (2026-02-05 06:14:17+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/198731470 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dentistry clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 06:24:38+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178437938
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-02-05 06:14:19+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1466266148 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Florist shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 06:24:38+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178437939
(No visible changes after review)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
NeisBot (2026-02-05 06:14:21+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13522228779 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Antique store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 06:24:40+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178437940
(No visible changes after review)
SD Mapman (2026-02-06 05:42:15+00:00): Hello! Thanks for contributing! It looks like you copy-pasted the same house multiple times. The typical process is to redraw each house with its particular shape.
NeisBot (2026-02-05 06:14:22+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13362526496 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Barbería y Salón"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 06:24:41+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178437943
(No visible changes after review)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
NeisBot (2026-02-05 06:14:23+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13524941981 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Truck repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 06:24:44+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178437944
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
felipeeugenio (2026-02-04 21:57:18+00:00): Hola. Por favor hacer cambios pequeños, grabar, y luego "ir" a otro lado a mapear. Así es más fácil la revisión. Sobre todo con maperos nuevos, que cometen más errores.

Por lo pronto, por favor usar tildes y cuidar la ortografía. Gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178112825
felipeeugenio (2026-02-04 21:58:01+00:00): Vemos que borró el registro civil con edificio y todo. Es un error? o ya no existe?

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178112825
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
boocha34 (2026-02-04 21:54:31+00:00): Updating Maseru new building, correcting/ updating roads along with surface types as part of a major task of Enriching Lesotho's dataset. I am basically taking all relevant geo-datasets at my disposal and adding them to the OSM map so that they can be readily available across all platforms.
Udarian (2026-02-04 21:57:17+00:00): a few notes, first landuse tags usually should not be on the same way as the building tag, aka if you want to add those tags please trace the area the apartment complex actually takes up (the full grounds) next time. Second the surface tag doesn't really apply to an apartment complex like this. Along the same lines, "concrete_block_and_stucco" is not correct as usually materials and surfaces should be individually listed, for example "concrete_block;stucco". For more information on common values for the material tag see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/building%3Amaterial#values .

Happy Mapping,
Udar.
Michael C Hall (2026-02-04 22:05:28+00:00): Thanks. Will correct ASAP.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-06 02:34:07+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13525088285
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1474268470

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-06 02:34:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13525121349
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13525121350
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13525121352

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
grzegorz75jan (2026-02-05 06:37:41+00:00): Ściany budynku mają kąt 90 stopni czy tak jak je narysowałeś pomiędzy 60-70 stopni. Jak myślisz ?

W prawdzie nie ma jeszcze dostępnych podkładów z obrysem tego budynku ale wystarczyło na podstawie zdjęcia lotniczego wykonać obrys po fundamentach a następnie zaznaczyć wykonany obrys i nacisnąć klawisz Q by wyrównać kąty.
Przy okazji drogi dojazdowe fatalne i wybrakowane choć to dzieło poprzedników włącznie z niby mostami które powinny być przepustami.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178113994
Rainero (2026-03-16 20:26:54+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179970117
(unzulässige Quelle)
Alliegaytor (2026-02-05 03:04:53+00:00): You've changed the naming scheme of the platforms here (Platform n -> Southern Cross n). While I disagree with this change, I think an individual naming schema should be applied consistently across the station. Currently it goes from "Southern Cross 14" -> "Platforms 15A...". Also, worth considering that most of the platforms in Melb train stations are named "Platform" rather than the name of the station. In fact, I'm pretty sure the only ones that use the station name were renamed by you
LachlanTansey2009 (2026-02-05 05:52:08+00:00): I see where you're coming from with the whole naming thing, I do the station name platform number as a way to make it easier when it comes to creating relations as to easily order the nodes. If its okay with you, I'll rename the regional platforms with that concept.
Alliegaytor (2026-02-05 06:19:11+00:00): Generally, we're not meant to use the name key solely to make it easier to edit route relations (an exception I often see is the name of a route being descriptive and including "from => to" - though that is controversial as I understand it). I think the name "Platform [number]" is a better fit for the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name key as it's the most common/used/known name for the platform. It's the name that the announcer uses when describing where a train is arriving/departing, and the name someone would probably give when asked "what is the name of this platform?". If you want to rename them, go ahead, but I think you should start a community discussion if you wish to continue renaming platforms in other stations, as we currently have two naming schemata
LachlanTansey2009 (2026-02-05 06:23:09+00:00): If its what is needed for this, im open to a community discussion. I'll go ahead and rename the remainder of the platforms at Southern Cross.
hoserab (2026-02-06 18:36:50+00:00): Hello Sean,

Quite literally everything you touched here—save for the `building:levels=2` tag you added to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1024301626—was done incorrectly. I have reverted all of these changes.

If this is for a course assignment please tell us what institution you're attending, the course name and the instructor's name.

Thanks
Seanybobocoy (2026-02-08 03:39:33+00:00): Hello,

This was for GEOG 588 Lab 2 at the University of Calgary with Rizwan Shahid.

I don't think the changes were intended to be kept, just to familiarize ourselves with the program.

Thanks.
hoserab (2026-02-09 17:01:35+00:00): Thank you for responding, and for elaborating on the course you're taking. I see other changes have been made by users who've included "GEOG 588" in their changeset summaries; I presume you're all in the same course, taking the same lab.

While your changes may not have been *intended* to be kept, when you clicked the 'save' button on the iD editor it uploaded your changes to the OSM database, and everything you did overwrote what was there before.
NeisBot (2026-02-05 06:14:26+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13522618041 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Insurance agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 06:24:45+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178437945
(No visible changes after review)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:06:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
NeisBot (2026-02-05 06:14:27+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13474339945 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Ultrasound clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 06:24:46+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178437947
(No visible changes after review)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
stasiu512 (2026-02-04 23:34:14+00:00): dokładniej maxweight:conditional=none
maxweightrating:hgv:conditional=none
hgv:conditional=none -> hgv:conditional=yes
mavl (2026-02-06 14:31:29+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, зачем вы добавляете на безымянные дороги название "Сибирский тракт"?  
Например:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54360480/history
mavl (2026-02-06 15:11:03+00:00): В этом пакете правок удалено много точек дорог. Добавлены линии без тегов с целью соединить старый Сибирский тракт, который уже не существует.  

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1474286479/history  
  
Качество карты местами ухудшилось. Этот пакет правок отменён.
Дымков Артём Денисович (2026-02-07 15:36:55+00:00): Многие участки старого тракта были подписаны ещё до меня. Если смотреть далее, то таких подписанных участков ещё много. Если на безымянные дороги нельзя добавлять название «Сибирский тракт», то такие и подобные им названия тоже надо убирать? Точки больше убирать не буду