piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:42:34+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13529282236 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Appliance repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-16 05:33:08+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178610724
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
rempshaener (2026-02-06 19:45:47+00:00): Hallo,
auch hierzu: keine Anmerkungen.
Viele Grüße
Syl (2026-02-07 12:12:34+00:00): Bonjour, je viens de vérifier le nom sur la façade, c'est bien "SG" qui est le nouveau nom de la Société Générale. Pourquoi avoir remis l'ancien nom ?
Toto2642 (2026-02-07 12:39:50+00:00): Bonjour,
Je n'ai pas regardé l'historique, je pensais que c'était une erreur et que c'était simplement un nouveau logo mais en regardant sur le site, en effet, c'est + qu'une évolution d'identité visuelle. Merci à toi pour ton attention !
Syl (2026-02-07 13:08:11+00:00): Merci d'avoir corrigé :)
Toto2642 (2026-02-07 13:09:47+00:00): ;)
tordans (2026-03-04 14:56:41+00:00): Hallo Langlaeufer, ich habe für https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13389408120/history die Rückmeldung bekommen, dass das nicht als Übergang zu sehen wäre. Ich stimme zu, da mehrspurige Straße ohne Anzeichen eines Übergangs. Ich habe daher umgetaggt.
Langlaeufer (2026-03-04 16:59:42+00:00): Die informal Übergänge ohne Wegeanschluss machen so aber keinen Sinn.
Langlaeufer (2026-03-04 17:01:54+00:00): Auf der Nordwest-Seite ist neben dem Geländer ein abgesenkter Bordstein. auf der Südseite ist der Bordstein überall nicht sonderlich hoch.
Langlaeufer (2026-03-04 17:19:56+00:00): Ich hoffe mein Änderungen sind jetzt ein akzeptabler Kompromiss
notmyproblem1 (2026-02-07 19:46:47+00:00): Ciao! La casetta postale non è più alla stazione ma si è trasferita presso il lungomare?

Fammi sapere, Grazie
Daniele Manz (2026-02-08 11:57:02+00:00): non volevo spostare la casetta postale. volevo solo indicare l'indirizzo del mio immobile perchè su Immobiliare.it, che utilizza il vostro portale, non riesco a trovare l'indirizzo di casa mia. come potrei procedere? grazie mille
Daniele Manz (2026-02-12 21:50:15+00:00): grazie mille. ho visto che avete aggiunto il numero 4 al condominio segnalata. Gentilissimi.
dieterdreist (2026-02-19 11:17:08+00:00): Ciao, mi chiedo cosa significa "da verificare"? Generalmente le verifiche si devono fare prima di caricare le modifiche. Mi stupisce che hai spostato il "Colle tre confini" lontano dai confini: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/306893590/history/6
Come hai rilevato la nuova posizione?
demon_box (2026-03-03 16:48:01+00:00): Ciao Arallus, ho visto che hai editato la cima del Monte Peso di Collebeato e nella descrizione del changeset leggo "Fixed mountain cross marked as chapel".
Scusami ma ti devo far notare che hai completamente sbagliato l'interpretazione... La situazione che hai trovato non si riferiva alla croce di vetta mappata come "chapel" ma al singolo altare.
Mappo dal 2010 e siccome a tutt'oggi non esiste purtroppo un tag ufficiale per definire l'altare religioso (e spesso in Italia se ne trovano sulle cime montuose) abbiamo già da diversi anni concordato a livello di community OSM Italia di mapparlo come nodo, così:

amenity=place_of_worshio
denomination=catholic
man_made=altar
religion=christian

Sappiamo che non è il migliore dei modi ma è quello meglio lo descrive in mancanza di tags specifici.

Ho rieditato la zona distinguendo la croce di vetta dall'altare (com'era prima) e aggiungendo anche l'elemento del basamento della croce stessa sulla quale è fissata la lapide con il tag "inscription".
Ti chiedo gentilmente di non modificare questa zona di nuovo essendo (ripeto) una modalità concordata da anni all'interno della community OSM Italia.
Grazie e BuonMapping!
rempshaener (2026-02-08 12:16:59+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Zu deinen Bearbeitungen habe ich ein paar kleine Anmerkungen.
- Farben: Die Farbangabe bei Unterflurhydranten dürfte nicht richtig sein. Nur zur Klarstellung: Das ist die Farbe, die der Hydrant vor Ort hat. Das hat nichts mit der Darstellung in Karten oder Apps zu tun.
- Hydrantennummer und Nennweite: In das Feld „ref“ kommt ausschließlich die Hydrantennummer, wie sie oben rechts auf dem Schild ausgewiesen ist. Die Nennweite wird im Feld fire_hydrant:diameter erfasst. D. h. so etwas wie „H100“ bitte löschen und ein fire_hydrant:diameter=100 daraus machen.
- Kupplungen bei Überflurhydranten: Die Angabe erfolgt getrennt nach Anzahl und Größe. D. h. aus couplings=2xB;1xA wird dann
couplings=3
couplings:diameters=A;B;B

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2026-02-08 12:17:47+00:00): Dann noch ein etwas komplizierter Fall, das ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13529396012:
name: Löschwasserentnahmestellen haben grundsätzlich keinen Namen, der müsste wieder raus.
Dann ist das man_made=storage_tank eigentlich redundant.
Meine Empfehlung:
Handelt es sich tatsächlich um einen offenen Wassertank (= Wasserentnahme mit Saugkorb), dann  wäre das
emergency=water_tank
water_tank:volume=150 m³

Handelt es sich um eine fest verrohrte Wasserentnahmestelle, passt besser
emergency=fire_hydrant
fire_hydrant:type=pipe
fire_hydrant:pressure=suction
water_source=water_tank
water_tank:volume=150 m³

Viele Grüße
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:42:36+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13438137967 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Community kitchen"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-16 05:33:09+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178232219
Natfoot (2026-03-09 06:56:10+00:00): someone probably dragged it by mistake. instead of deleting it you can place a note and someone will come fix it. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes
you can also look at the changset history to see what changes have been made.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178193866
Natfoot (2026-03-09 07:04:31+00:00): I added it back https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1486789303
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178193866
Frans S (2026-02-06 16:42:36+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Did you read where and how to use the track tag? Here, the traces are so vague and narrow, no traces of traffic by cars.
Retagged to paths.
Best regards
BridgetteMS (2026-02-06 18:12:35+00:00): Hi thanks for validating :)
There were tyre tracks heading off the Minor / Unclassified Road in a valley, hence I labelled as such.
Thanks
Frans S (2026-02-07 10:38:53+00:00): Hi. Back again.
Check this wiki please to learn where to use which tag. Important here are
Path, unclassified and tertiary

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Afghanistan#Values_based_on_economic_and_social_dimension_of_the_road

You see that the tag 'track' is not valid here.
Best regards.
rempshaener (2026-02-08 12:22:21+00:00): Hallo,
ein Hinweis am Beispiel von https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13529430527:
Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie.
Viele Grüße
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:40:47+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/561807301 v10 | 13 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5538817217 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178194244
Jordi MF (2026-02-06 23:37:54+00:00): No importa lo que diga la cartelería externa. La toponimia oficial en Galicia es en gallego, por lo que los nombres principales deben de ir en gallego también en OSM. Es correcto añadir el nombre en name:es.
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:40:48+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/561807301 v10 | 13 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/648972579 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178194367
ToniE (2026-02-06 16:22:39+00:00): Servus,

meinst du mit 'wire_mesh' eventuell 'chain_link'?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fence%20type?uselang=en#Values

Gruß,
Toni
ToniE (2026-02-06 16:23:00+00:00): Oops: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fence%20type?uselang=en#Values
Jordi MF (2026-02-06 23:35:44+00:00): Hola. La licencia de Wikipedia no es compatible con OSM y no podemos copiar datos de Wikipedia. Por lo tanto, esta edición no es correcta.
TrickyFoxy (2026-02-07 10:29:03+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178221847
eggie (2026-02-06 16:13:27+00:00): Hoi..
Schuiven net de kaart levert vaak schade op door onbedoelde verllaatsingen van objecten. Bv een adrrsnode.
Je denkt dat de kaart schuift.. maar in dit geval het adres
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=178194842

Beter dus niet schuiven.
Mvg
eggie
RJ-Gouda (2026-02-06 16:16:18+00:00): Mijn excuses, zal ik niet meer doen.
eggie (2026-02-06 16:22:07+00:00): Lange Tiendeweg 13 teruggezet

Het komt omdat je met de linker muis selecteert, maar daar schuif je ook mee.
Met editor JOSM schuif je met de rechtermuisknop.


editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047

Een aanrader dus
RJ-Gouda (2026-02-06 16:24:14+00:00): Aha, goed om te weten, ik zal mij gaan verdiepen in JOSM.
rempshaener (2026-02-06 19:46:45+00:00): Hallo,
keine Anmerkungen zu diesem CS.
Viele Grüße
trial (2026-02-07 22:06:29+00:00): Il n'y a pas un couac quelque part ?
La gendarmerie de Pont-Scroff devient la gendarmerie de Bubry sans avoir déménagé !
trial (2026-02-07 22:07:16+00:00): Pont-Scorff : https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178194980#18/47.83059/-3.40351
arjunaraoc (2026-02-06 16:20:31+00:00): Additional sources: The Andhra Pradesh Gazette No:877,  No:879  dated 30 December 2025
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:40:53+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/908139959 v1 | 7 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/8432513670 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178195668
stillhart (2026-02-28 09:58:19+00:00): so zur info. Man kann die Ladestation als fläche als amenity=charging_station mappen und dann die einzelnen Ladesäulen als man_made=charge_point :-)
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:42:38+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13372707724 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Electric bike store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-16 05:33:10+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178610726
(No visible changes after review)
rempshaener (2026-02-06 19:47:25+00:00): Hallo,
das sieht gut aus.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2026-02-06 19:49:11+00:00): Hallo,
keine Anmerkungen zum CS.
Viele Grüße
gablerto (2026-02-06 19:51:38+00:00): Hallo. 
Danke für die Überprüfungen.
Schönes Wochenende. 
Gruss Tobias
wachsihh (2026-02-07 00:56:35+00:00): Was ist so schwierig daran, Objekte rechtwinklig zu machen? Und nicht einfach Objekte anderer Nutzer zu löschen. Bitte arbeite künftig sorgfältiger. Niemand hat die Zeit, Deinen Pfusch nachzubessern!
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:40:57+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1474794535 v1 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1474794534 v1 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1419717197 v9

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178196911
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:42:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13529537054 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Real estate office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-16 05:33:11+00:00): ❌ Text fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178337385
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-08 05:05:59+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13529548589

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Kancelaria Budrewicz (2026-02-09 12:28:16+00:00): Kompletnie nie rozumiem tej uwagi. Budynek przy ul. Okrzei 18 w Warszawie stoi od 2017r. Od sierpnia 2018r. mam tutaj kancelarię w lokalu nr 20. Ulica jest w tym miejscu od 1792 roku, a obecną nazwę nosi od roku 1948, więc nie wiem, o czym mówimy w kontekście uwagi: "Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy".
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-08 15:31:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/181285866/history - jesteś pewien że to jest czynny kościół?

Are you sure that it is currently used as a place of worship?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-23 08:43:31+00:00): ping?
Pernycek (2026-05-26 07:05:35+00:00): Sorry, my bad. I fixed it.
eggie (2026-02-06 18:08:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Eigenlijk is access=no voldoende. Die andere accesstags kunnen dan weg.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Ltrlg (2026-02-07 08:09:18+00:00): Le chemin tel qu’ajouté n’est pas intégré au réseau des highway=*, ce qui est rarement une bonne idée. D’autre part, cette bande est placée sur le côté du trajet logique des piétons plutôt qu’au milieu, c’est étrange.
sanzay (2026-02-07 17:03:51+00:00): Tracer de la bande guidante exactement à partir de la  vue  satellite et observer sur place
Ltrlg (2026-02-07 08:14:14+00:00): Tu as ajouté way/1474805655 par dessus un chemin existant, mais la bonne pratique est de couper en deux le chemin existant pour ajuster ses attributs là où c’est nécessaire.
sanzay (2026-02-07 17:09:02+00:00): Desole, j'ai souhaité tracer de la bande guidante exactement à partir de la  vue  satellite et observer sur place .
C'est pourquoi, je souhaite la vérification pour modification nécessaire.Merci
Yuri Matias (2026-05-21 20:36:11+00:00): Prezado Fernando, o nome do Bairro é oficialmente apenas Bandeirantes desde 2016, segundo a Lei municipal nº. 3024/2016. Os loteamentos que são chamados "Parque dos Bandeirantes", mudei de suburb para neighborood.
eggie (2026-02-06 18:11:49+00:00): Dag BA   Dit wordt niet begrepen door een router.

De juiste tagging is dan 
oneway=yes
en een extra regel 
oneway:bicycle=no
Wanneer het voor moped en mofa geldt kun je die uitzondering ook toevoegen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-06 18:14:30+00:00): Als bovenstaand aangepast.
NEOK Ground Truth (2026-02-10 00:26:49+00:00): I can confirm onsite signs match this name. I have extended this label in changeset 178334485.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178199091
hoserab (2026-02-06 18:11:13+00:00): Sorry, "4th Street and 1st Ave", not the other way around. Either way, not a real intersection, and the 'virtual' intersection point of those two roads (if they did intersect) is  ~250 m south of the park.
TrickyFoxy (2026-02-24 09:49:57+00:00): Почему вы удалили дорожки к подъездам?
morkovkin (2026-02-24 15:07:32+00:00): Эти подъезды расположены на уровне земли и скорее всего это было основным фактором(точно уже не помню). Я начинающий в osm и буду благодарен, если Вы скажете как правильно.
TrickyFoxy (2026-02-24 18:44:49+00:00): В общем-то их можно было оставить, вполне допустимо их рисовать. Прадва, некоторым такие дорожки не нравятся, но раз вы же их и нарисовали, то ладно.
Tolhuis (2026-04-15 07:58:57+00:00): In het vrt-artikel heeft men het over deze kerk: 196705157. Herent is een dorpje in de gemeente Pelt.
Deze kerk in gemeente Herent is wellicht nog in gebruik.
Jakka (2026-04-15 08:04:25+00:00): OK ongedaan gemaakt
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:42:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/4519441 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "map link"
---
Örneğin metnin daha tarafsız ve gerçek bir versiyonu şöyle olabilir: "harita bağlantısı"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-16 05:33:12+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178610727
(No visible changes after review)
Ltrlg (2026-02-07 08:16:41+00:00): C’est une voie rapide sans trottoir, qu’est-ce qui te fait penser qu’on peut l’emprunter à pied ?
sanzay (2026-02-07 17:14:08+00:00): Désolé , mais je ne souhaitais que rajouter que le tracé  de la bande guidante exactement à partir de la  vue  satellite et observer sur place en face les magasins Atelier Laurent et Proxi et celle de l’église à l’arrêt de bus
BCNorwich (2026-02-07 06:41:05+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've reverted this changeset because it removed a highway making it a business.

From your website, I added an office POI where I think the business is located.

Is this an online only business? The website mentions a showroom, where is this located please.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2026-02-07 07:19:57+00:00): Hang On a bit. 
I now realise your Brunswick Street is in Darlington, this location here is in London. 

Am I correct in this assumption? If so I can correct the location for you. I'll wait for your response.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2026-02-09 08:30:22+00:00): I've moved it.
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:41:08+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 32 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1474819426 v1 | 10 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1474819424 v1 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1474819423 v1 | 7 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178200573
Hufkratzer (2026-02-06 22:06:59+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1474819805 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1474819806 don't look like horse riding centres ( leisure=horse_riding ): they look more like a round pen and a horse riding arena. These are usually tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian , see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian) and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241327623#map=19/42.193689/13.514314&layers=P (example)

Traduzione automatica:

Ciao,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1474819805 e https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1474819806 non sembrano centri di equitazione (leisure=horse_riding): sembrano piuttosto un recinto circolare e un maneggio. Questi sono solitamente contrassegnati con leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, vedi
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian) e
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241327623#map=19/42.193689/13.514314&layers=P (esempio)

Tradotto con DeepL.com (versione gratuita)
bbmc_GAE (2026-02-13 08:18:48+00:00): Ho modificato le descrizioni come da te suggerito.
Secondo te, ora sono esatte?
Grazie, saluti!
Hufkratzer (2026-02-14 18:42:01+00:00): Traduzione automatica:

Non so se https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1477377238 sia davvero un campo di equitazione ( leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian ); nelle diverse immagini aeree appare in modo diverso. Forse si tratta solo di un paddock -> vedi  landuse=animal_keeping . Per il resto sembra corretto. Si tratta di https://www.facebook.com/iltorello14 ?
Jordi MF (2026-02-07 00:11:10+00:00): Hola,
¿Podrías aportar fuentes para el nombre que has añadido en name:es?
Rainero (2026-03-16 19:40:06+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179968557
(unzulässige Quelle)
Jordi MF (2026-02-07 00:11:20+00:00): Hola,
¿Podrías aportar fuentes para el nombre que has añadido en name:es?