piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck (2024-05-30 15:53:20+00:00): Dear user raycock, in this changeset you have added lots of street names that are 100% identical to what Google Maps has. In some areas Google is missing names on some streets, and in these areas you have added names to all streets except those missing on Google. This makes the explanation "I was there on a survey" very unlikely. 

I understand how it can be frustrating not to have a name to add to a road you have traced from imagery, but please resist the urge to violate Google's copyright; you must not copy names from Google maps, or else you risk to tarnish OSM's reputation as a whole (and needless to say, that of your original contributions as well).

In at least one other situation you have added a point of interest that is still on Google Maps but long closed in reality, which also is suspicious and cannot be explained by a bona fide survey.

Please stick to legal sources in the future, and properly name your sources when uploading (write "survey" as a source when you have surveyed the area in person but please be honest here - looking things up on Google is not a "survey"). 

I will have to withdraw some of your recently added names from OSM.
raycock (2024-05-31 00:48:14+00:00): All these streets in this area has been verified in person and I use to work in Johnston County 911 and added streets to their system. If you can't verify them, then I will not add any more as I was trying to get emergency personnel to the location where they are needed. My services are needed with Johnston County GIS system anyway.
raycock (2024-06-03 18:05:59+00:00): One other thing that I neglected to mention. I add streets to Google Maps, Apple Maps, Open Street Maps, and Tom Tom at the same time so that is why the similarities in the names but no more. I get streets added without explanation to Apple Maps and Google without being harassed. I know where this came from.
woodpeck (2024-06-04 08:48:58+00:00): Please do not mis-label legitimate OpenStreetMap quality assurance as "harrassment". We are making this map together, and we're all interested in OSM being a high quality map - which includes being legally spotless. 

You say that you have recorded these street names in person. A good way to bolster that claim in the future is to take a few photos of street signs which proves that you've actually been there. It's not something we would ask of someone adding the odd street name, but if someone adds streets names for a whole quarter and they just happen to be the same as Google's, then a few photos will go a long way to lift suspicions.

Your claim to be adding maps to Tom Tom, Google, and Apple simultaneously sounds implausible, especially as, while the NAMES in your OSM mapping are all identical to Google's, the geometries are not. If this is a story you want to stick to, we'll need some proof that allows us to see that roads have actually been added to these maps at the same time as they have been added to OSM.

Your work for the county GIS system is commendable but please keep it separate from OSM; the county might have a different bar for contributions than OSM.
une abeille (2024-02-08 17:00:39+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

If you're new to contributing, please make sure to read the wiki if you are unsure about anything. It contains a beginner's guide, as well as detailed information on all common map elements and standards.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

In Montreal we use an offset of 0.6, -1.54 for the 2020 Bing imagery that is the default in iD editor. If you draw or realign elements, please change your offset to this value in iD by going into the Background Settings (shortcut: B key) and scrolling to the bottom to find Imagery Offset.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Montr%C3%A9al

In addition, please try to make your changeset comments descriptive. Other mappers should be able to tell what you changed based on your description.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks for contributing!
eggie (2024-02-08 16:09:41+00:00): Beste KKies

Waarom een weg width=0  Dat kan fysiek niet.
edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147223861
MVG
eggie
une abeille (2024-02-08 16:59:22+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

If you're new to contributing, please make sure to read the wiki if you are unsure about anything. It contains a beginner's guide, as well as detailed information on all common map elements and standards.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

In Montreal we use an offset of 0.6, -1.54 for the 2020 Bing imagery that is the default in iD editor. If you draw or realign elements, please change your offset to this value in iD by going into the Background Settings (shortcut: B key) and scrolling to the bottom to find Imagery Offset.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Montr%C3%A9al

Thanks for contributing!
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-08 19:47:27+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147216577
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-08 19:47:38+00:00): Thanks, BCNorwich!
une abeille (2024-02-08 18:06:25+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

If you're new to contributing, please make sure to read the wiki if you are unsure about anything. It contains a beginner's guide, as well as detailed information on all common map elements and standards.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

In Montreal we use an offset of 0.6, -1.54 for the 2020 Bing imagery that is the default in iD editor. If you draw or realign elements, please change your offset to this value in iD by going into the Background Settings (shortcut: B key) and scrolling to the bottom to find Imagery Offset.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Montr%C3%A9al

I see that you have added a park node here and requested review. Generally parks are drawn as areas, not nodes. But this appears to be a school grounds, so it should probably not be marked as a park.

Thanks for contributing!
eggie (2024-02-08 16:28:46+00:00): Top!
gscholz (2024-02-17 06:51:02+00:00): Hi Harvesterify,
your recent changesets have created several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways, especially several roundabouts are affected here:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=1.38576&lat=43.50759&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147224415

These errors are caused by splitting roundabouts by using "osm-relatify" which is buggy. Please do not split roundabouts, keep them intact.

This kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2024-02-17 06:51:31+00:00): 

Hi Harvesterify,
your recent changesets have created several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways, especially several roundabouts are affected here:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=1.38576&lat=43.50759&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147224415

These errors are caused by splitting roundabouts by using "osm-relatify" which is buggy. Please do not split roundabouts, keep them intact.

This kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-26 15:25:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/825058367/history has shop = fast_food that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=fast_food ? Is it amenity=fast_food ? If not, what this tag is intended to mean? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfast_food
chinook17 (2024-04-30 12:38:54+00:00): Bonjour,
Cycleway:lane doit être utilisé sur Guy plutôt qu'une piste cyclable séparée puisqu'il s'agit uniquement d'une bande cyclable, surtout au sud de Ville-Marie. Pouvez-vous défaire les changements effectués?
Merci!
MxxCon (2024-02-11 02:47:26+00:00): There's a ferry terminal there?🤨
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147224833
CurlingMan13 (2024-02-11 03:09:44+00:00): I'm on the fence about it.  I removed it for now.  Looks like it could be a ferry terminal, but idk, pier is good enough for now.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147224833
MxxCon (2024-02-11 03:12:46+00:00): Ya, I couldn't find any ferry routes that go here. Seems like just a pier. 👍
Ygramul (2024-02-08 17:39:27+00:00): Ich schätze mal, du warst hier vor Ort, oder? Ich wollt da immer noch mal vorbeifahren. Wir bestellen auf Arbeit regelmäßig bei Domino's in der Herrenberger Str. und der Laden hier ist online angeblich immer noch vorhanden. Daher war ich mir bei dem Hinweis nicht so ganz sicher, wie sicher der ist.
Velosoph (2024-02-08 18:01:34+00:00): Yepp, bin heute Nachmittag dort vorbeigefahren. An der Tür hängt ein Zettel, sinngemäß "hier ist zu, komm in die Herrenberger Straße".
Syl (2024-02-17 09:34:33+00:00): J'ai annulé ce groupe de modifications, voir https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/ajouter-le-trace-de-communes-disparues/21113
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-08 17:01:03+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Marszałka Piłsudskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361968216
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444607812
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444608190
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444631140

"Langiewicza":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509469847
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/869064882
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1219826745

"Gajzlera":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509549817

"Ponurego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897096876

"Słoneczna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1068262653

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2024-02-09 12:43:15+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
In general  well mapped. However:
Squared not all buildings.
connected nodes of buildings to other features like roads.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147225943
rarad74 (2024-02-08 19:05:11+00:00): Salut. Nu se pun ca strazi rezidentiale drumurile de acces in parcarile blocurilor. Se pun ca service roads cu tot setul de taguri aferente gen, surface, tip de service road, limita de viteza( daca este) si tip de acces. Nu tragem doar o linie  cu tipul de drum si atat. Multumesc.
TrailJunkie (2024-02-09 17:06:50+00:00): Hi rarad74,

I originally thought highway=residential would be most appropriate here because this road is accessing more than one residential building, but I now see that the OSM Wiki’s pipestems section on the service=driveway page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway#Pipestems) does fit this location well and I agree with using service for these scenarios. Thank you for reaching out!

--Automatic Translation--

Bună rarad74,

Inițial am crezut că highway=residential ar fi cea mai potrivită aici, deoarece acest drum accesează mai mult de o clădire rezidențială, dar acum văd că secțiunea pipestems a OSM Wiki pe pagina service=driveway (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki /Tag:service%3Ddriveway#Pipestems) se potrivește bine acestei locații și sunt de acord cu utilizarea serviciului pentru aceste scenarii. Vă mulțumim că ne-ați contactat!
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-08 19:54:04+00:00): Hi Vahaldor, welcome to OSM.

I guess your map changes should be reviewed by the local community. In Austria, there are sometimes very strict restrictions regarding mountain biking.

Thanks!
Vahaldor (2024-02-08 19:59:22+00:00): I am going to ride a bike there tomorrow, so I will check it in place but I think that I rode the path about two years ago. Nevertheless, I will come back here tomorrow to confirm it or cancel the edit.
maraf24 (2024-02-10 17:30:39+00:00): Dlaczego jakieś kiepskie polne drogi dostają unclassified? 
Skąd wiesz, jaka jest nawierzchnia? Nie widać tego na Geoportalu.
kaciorx (2024-02-10 18:53:29+00:00): A co ma nawierzchnia do jej klasyfikacji? surface i smoothness odnosi się do nawierzchni, a klasyfikacja do jej przeznaczenia. Jeśli droga służy jako dojazd do posiadłości i ma oznaczenie track to jest to błędem. Możesz podesłać, co do której drogi masz wątpliwości to ją zobacze jeszcze raz
citrula (2024-02-08 19:30:09+00:00): Welcome back to OSM. You can press "q" in iD to square the corners of buildings you draw! Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147226748
une abeille (2024-02-08 18:08:08+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

If you're new to contributing, please make sure to read the wiki if you are unsure about anything. It contains a beginner's guide, as well as detailed information on all common map elements and standards.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

In Montreal we use an offset of 0.6, -1.54 for the 2020 Bing imagery that is the default in iD editor. If you draw or realign elements, please change your offset to this value in iD by going into the Background Settings (shortcut: B key) and scrolling to the bottom to find Imagery Offset.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Montr%C3%A9al

It appears that you have drawn a cycle path on a road that was already tagged as having one. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1160738173) It is difficult to tell from looking, but this way has tags that indicate the road has a dedicated cycle path. Renderers such as CyclOSM use this to display the cycle path.

It's also good practice to keep your changes local to one area. If you'd like to edit things in multiple cities or countries, please save your work before moving on to the next one. :)

Thanks for contributing!
une abeille (2024-02-25 04:28:56+00:00): Reverted cycle path

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147877420
Glassman (2024-02-09 17:49:55+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

One #TIP: address are spelled out in OSM. The reason is software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you fix two of the addresses you added on Beverly Boulevard? Thanks - I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147226964
infeeeee (2024-02-09 22:08:54+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMap-en!

Ez egy műalkotás, aminek a megjelölt forrás alapján ez a címe. Lényegtelen, hogy mi az aktuális szakkifejezés, az ellenőrizhető valóságot térképezzük, nem azt aminek lennie kéne ha tökéletes lenne a világ. Ha tudsz más forrást, ahol megerősítik, hogy ez az szobor címe, akkor természetesen jogos az átnevezésed.

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
tamas3453632 (2024-02-14 11:23:53+00:00): Szép napot!

Köszönöm a segítséget, most kezdek csak mint szerkesztő. Egy dologban kérhetném a segítséget? Az új TF pályánál a régi elbontott pálya rajzolata alsó rétegként még megmaradhatott valahogy, amit egyes megjelenítők előre hoznak. Itt elérhetővé tettem egy képet róla:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tZzB0P8IP_-DMgX74DpwgmMYIIsEKwSk/view?usp=sharing

Tudna segíteni ennek a törlésében?
Köszönettel:
Magyar Tamás
infeeeee (2024-02-14 12:59:59+00:00): Milyen program ez? Ezek az adatok nincsenek már az OpenStreetMapen, a programban valamiért beragadhattak. Nem tudok ebben segíteni, a program fejlesztői segíthetnek.

OpenStreetMapen a megjelenítés és az adat szét van választva, egymástól független, itt csak az adattal kapcsolatos dolgokat lehet szerkeszteni, én is csak ebben tudok segíteni.

Azt te is ellenőrizheted, hogy a képernyőképeden látható dolgok nem látszanak itt sehol, akkor se ha a szerkesztésre kattintasz, se ha a rétegek->Térképadatok gombot benyomod a jobb oldali rétegválasztóban. Ezekkel mindent megjeleníthetsz egyszerre.

Nagyon sok offline program működik úgy, hogy időnként letölti az aktuális állapotot. Ebben az esetben valamiért egyszerre látszik a régi és az új adat is. Próbáld meg újra letölteni az adatokat, vagy valami hasonló gombot keresni.
maraf24 (2024-04-10 18:03:31+00:00): I ustaliłeś nawierzchnię dróg na podstawie niewyraźnego orto?
kaciorx (2024-04-10 18:37:05+00:00): Jak już mówisz o którejś drodze to chociaż podaj jakiś id o którym mówisz.
Poza tym zaczynasz zmieniać kategorie dróg widzę tam gdzie to jest niezasadne. unclasified jeśli droga służy jako tranzyt a widzę że pełno na residental zmieniłeś i na odwrót. Żeby nie być gołosłownym to odsyłam do wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
Przykładowo 175203823 droga nieutwardzona była unclasified a jest residental, a ewidentnie łączy dwie wsie.
Zamiast się bawić i żebyśmy zmieniali swoje zmiany co chwilę to fajnie byłoby najpierw przedyskutować żebyśmy czasu nie tracili na jakieś przepychanki. Zwłaszcza, że to za co się zabrałem ostatnio zawiera dane sprzed ponad 10 lat w większości więc to co robię to raczej nie jest jakaś nadgorliwość tylko faktycznie chcę zrobić porządek bo routing z tymi danymi to przez klepiska wiecznie prowadzi.
maraf24 (2024-04-10 18:58:20+00:00): Drogi na pola też często łączą dwie wsie. Jeśli to było stosowane kryterium to niestety narobiłeś dużego bałaganu.
Droga residential to droga nadająca się do jazdy, ale o niższej kategorii niż unclassified. Idealna dla mieszkańców dwóch wsi, którzy chcą do siebie jeździć.
Można na orto odróżnić drogę rolną od unclassified, ale w praktyce wymaga to paru odwiedzin w terenie, by nauczyć się kojarzyć wygląd drogi na orto z wyglądem w terenie.
Dalej nie wiem jak rozróżniłeś gravel od compacted.
maraf24 (2024-04-10 19:02:36+00:00): W sprawie przytoczonej wyżej drogi 175203823.
Przypatrz się na orto temu miejscu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3611439596
Doskonale tu widać, że ta droga nie służyu do ruchu między wsiami, ale wyłącznie zabudowaniom przy niej. Stąd prawidłowa jest kategoria residential.
kaciorx (2024-04-10 20:05:59+00:00): Ad 1 Nie rozumiem co znaczy "nadająca się do jazdy" i co to ma do residental i unclassified.
Cytat z wiki dla residental "without function of connecting settlements". Nie wiem skąd to dopowiadanie czy mieszkańcy dwóch wsi będą używać czy ogólnie jako do tranzytu. Raczej wiki w tym miejscu jest dosyć jasne czym ta droga ma być.
Ad 2 mówisz o tym kącie ostrym na drodze? To że tak to jest u nas naniesione to raczej błąd bo na zdjęciu widać wyjeżdżony tam trójkąt. Czyli do posesji na południu z obu stron jak i również żeby dalej kontynuować jazdę tą samą drogą. 
Jeszcze mi powiedz w jakim kontekście bałaganu narobiłem? Cały czas edytuję pod to co wiki sugeruje i staram się nie robić żadnej nadinterpretacji
maraf24 (2024-04-20 14:07:42+00:00): Wiki jest opisowe. Tzn. działa w jedną stronę - opisuje, co dany tag oznacza. Rzadko działa w drugą stronę - nie opisuje, jak dobierać tagi.
Czyli wiki opisuje, czym jest droga residential i to cytujesz. Ale nie podaje kryteriów, jak ustalić, jak droga ma ten tag dostać.
Ta droga nie jest drogą unclassified, bo nie jest przeznaczona do tranzytu. Możliwość fizycznego przejazdu jest nieistotna,  na tej zasadzie wszystkie drogi polna i leśne byłyby unclassified.
Czy droga jest unclassified można się łatwo przekonać w terenie. Jeśli jest przeznaczona do komunikacji między miejscowościami, to będą tam stały zielone tablice kierunkowe. 
Jeśli nie stoją, to czy jest tam zauważalny ruch samochodowy poza mieszkańcami tych 2 zabudowań?
literan (2024-02-08 18:32:57+00:00): скорее https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Abuilding%3Dtower
Sergey82K (2024-02-12 15:22:18+00:00): З тролейбусного парку та з Молдованської вулиці є лівий поворот. Навіщо видалили перемичку?
Lazorenko Valeriia (2024-02-16 15:36:21+00:00): З Молдовської вулиці поворот тільки направо, можете перевірити на Google Maps.
Sergey82K (2024-02-16 17:29:54+00:00): На Google Maps застарілі фото.
SomeoneElse (2024-03-27 12:13:01+00:00): Hello,
I've removed the name that you added to some access land on Bannau Brycheiniog.  It is not called that; that is the name of the national park (of which it forms part).
Are you sure that the other heathland areas here are really called what you have named them here?
Best Regards,
Andy
conifermapper (2024-03-27 13:32:30+00:00): Hi SomeoneElse,

The area named Bannau Brycheiniog is the mountain area directly south of Brecon including Pen y Fan and Waun Rydd, which are the 'original' Brecon Beacons. It is the name of the mountains in this are which was later taken as the name of the National Park.

You can see this area named in the official National Park Map at: https://i.pinimg.com/736x/a9/97/7c/a9977c34b539d0b6a9ec1e1f745c555f--sustainable-tourism-wales-uk.jpg

conifermapper
conifermapper (2024-03-27 13:33:45+00:00): The inage also shows other named areas which are not shown on the map but are the names of the wider massif/ mountain areas
ADAC Touristische InfoSysteme (2024-02-12 18:10:35+00:00): Hi saltyseadog,
thanks for your changes, but there a no connected streets to the ports anymore (see warnings:disconnected_way:highway“). Can you please check that so that navigation systems and route planner can use this ferry again? Thanks!
ADAC Touristische InfoSysteme (2024-02-20 12:21:31+00:00): Hey @saltyseadog,
is there any chance that you can fix the problem?
Thanks
mtmail (2024-05-21 13:24:07+00:00): Hello fellow mapper. How did you determine a house number and postcode for a dog park? I mean parks usually don't have addresses. Is 302 BiSovent Street for the community center real or made up?
user_177389 (2024-02-08 20:21:37+00:00): Hi,

diese Relationen waren defekt, weil du sie nicht vor dem Schneiden der Grenzlinie (way 331034994) geladen hattest:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147231386

Ist repariert.
Penegal (2024-02-09 06:34:56+00:00): Hallo!

Ach ja? Komisch; JOSM sagte nichts dagegen, wenn ich das Multipolygon machte. Vielen Dank für deine Hilfe!
Cebderby (2024-02-24 16:59:00+00:00): False (english) primary name and trashing of well mapped water areas, false 2nd outer water area covering land and buildings by new user reverted: changesets 147225388, 147227951, 147228069, 147228151
User webhound, if you know these water areas to be fishing=private, you are welcome to add this information, but do not trash the map in doing so.
jmarchon (2024-02-09 06:00:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Nice work!
Tomas Straupis (2024-02-09 08:35:48+00:00): Pakeitimas atšauktas, nes sugadintas vandens žymėjimas.
Tomas Straupis (2024-02-09 08:34:12+00:00): Sugadintas vandens žymėjimas, todėl pakeitimas atšauktas.
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-27 22:01:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 147991710 where the changeset comment is: undoing my revert from 19 days ago after community complaints; apparently a more nuanced approach is required
yo_scottie_oh (2024-02-08 19:39:04+00:00): I don't want to make drastic changes, but even after my change, Boulevard northbound still looks offset a little too far to the east relative to GPS tracks. That said, hopefully it's at least slightly better than before the change.
jacobwhall (2024-02-23 06:07:47+00:00): This looks like a good change, thanks. We have a lot of imprecise roads throughout the fan, as I'm sure you've noticed!
Anton Melnichuk (2024-02-28 09:08:38+00:00): you are broken 2 region in Ukraine!