piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2024-08-21 07:39:44+00:00): Hi GERamos,
this changeset has destroyed the boudary relation of "La Celeste":


https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-60.96746&lat=-34.58458&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12015586/history#map=16/-34.58491/-60.96681

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146799777

I have just fixed this.
Kind regards
Guido
d_berger (2024-01-30 01:17:46+00:00): Ziehe nicht irgendwelche Papierfahrpläne zu Rate, sondern die freien GTFS-Datensätze, die uns von der SKI via opentransportdata.swiss zur Verfügung gestellt werden. Die 403 fährt sonntags nach Attinghausen und wechselt auf die 402 nach Brügg. Würde man auch merken, würde man die Fahrplanfelder studieren.
opendcc (2024-01-29 06:18:42+00:00): Bauhof war hier nicht und wird auch 2024/25 nicht hierher kommen. Dringende Bitte: unterlasse diesen Vandalismus/mechanical Edit.
Warin61 (2024-01-29 11:40:20+00:00): Relation  	3423234 - bus route 549 from Parramatta still has ways out of sequence. I have not checked the stops.

Relation 3423235 546 from Parramatta is of for ways in sequence.
Thierry1030 (2025-06-06 18:39:02+00:00): Hello, there's a question about this storage point in this note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4160880
can you reply to the question? thanks in advance.
MxxCon (2024-02-04 06:11:02+00:00): You could've easily updated this building's tags 🙂
Use https://jmapb.github.io/nycaabs to find metadata and the current nycdoitt:bin number, if it changed, and all the other relevant building info. 🙂 It's pretty simple.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146801823
Robin Zyx (2024-02-04 22:30:38+00:00): If I remember correctly, I tried looking it up, but whatever city website I consulted didn't have the height of the new building. I don't recall whether the BIN I saw was the same as the old or not.
MxxCon (2024-02-05 04:04:48+00:00): That's why jmapb's site is so helpful. :) It automatically looks it up in the correct places. And if you don't have BIN, you can search by address or even from the map on the right side.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-29 03:40:46+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11562881360

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2024-02-21 15:58:47+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Your mappings are good . However, some buildings are clustered.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146802466
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-29 07:06:16+00:00): See note from anonymous:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4091423#map=16/37.7641/-122.4351&layers=N
ajmat (2024-01-30 17:18:32+00:00): Hi CurlingMan13

Thank you very much for your valuable feedback and sharing that note. I have updated back service way according to suggestion. I will be more cautious while editing in OSM in the future.
Oskarst_ (2024-05-28 14:39:39+00:00): Hi! It looks like way 1243951752 might go underneath 헌릉로 and continuing further west according to Strava Heatmap. Do you happen to know this path?
mavl (2024-02-23 18:51:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147818131, 147828921 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
Glassman (2024-01-31 19:55:34+00:00): Thanks for fixing Northwest. In OSM we spell out street names. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you also change Ct to Court? (Assuming it is court) Thanks - I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146805625
Glassman (2024-01-31 19:55:35+00:00): Thanks for fixing Northwest. In OSM we spell out street names. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you also change Ct to Court? (Assuming it is court) Thanks - I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146805625
4004 (2024-02-25 00:53:47+00:00): Добрый день, спасибо за правку.
там же нет никаких знаков, откуда ограничение?
4004 (2024-03-09 23:10:06+00:00): reverted
mavl (2024-02-23 18:52:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147818131, 147828921 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
codywindrose (2026-02-21 14:52:43+00:00): It's obviously not sand, at least not sand that ever shows up over the water, I'll change it back to natural=reef when I'll refine it today. It's not 100% reef but look at other atolls in the Marshall Islands, it's also a border of the areas of the atoll where the water is very shallow. At least that's how it's used in the marshall islands.
codywindrose (2026-02-21 15:58:09+00:00): I'm done, and fair enough, there's quite a lot of sand banks. Will use natural=shoal.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dshoal
NeisBot (2024-01-30 08:11:10+00:00): partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146806593
BaghdadiMapper (2024-01-29 17:01:25+00:00): Hi MountSuckling,

Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243969601 that you added is blocked from both ways by blocks and isn’t even paved (I have seen it in person) and isn’t even present in government maps, while you added it as a normal street. Edits like these do more harm than good by introducing false information into the map and confusing data clients and routers. This is not the only instance of this but overall a general trend of you and your team so please be more considerate when adding streets. 

Regards, BaghdadiMapper.
BaghdadiMapper (2024-01-29 17:03:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by changeset 146830450
MountSuckling (2024-01-31 20:20:54+00:00): Hello BaghdadiMapper!

Thank you for reaching out and letting me know your concerns. These edits were made based on recent imagery from November 2023 that shows a change in the road to allow traffic through, although since you have personally visited this street I will defer to your knowledge. For the other errors from the team that you mentioned, could you provide more information or specific examples on the ‘general trend’? We’re committed to making high quality contributions to OSM, and knowing more about what you’ve seen could be valuable for iterating on and improving our processes.

Thanks again,
-MountSuckling
BaghdadiMapper (2024-02-10 12:35:09+00:00): Hi MountSuckling,

I went to the area of the street to find that it was really there and its construction was finished, so I readded it in changeset 147290791, sorry for the inconvenience.

Regards, BaghdadiMapper
Dodko (2024-01-30 20:51:45+00:00): Ak máš 2 telefóny pevnú linku a mobil lepšie je ich rozdeliť, pevnú linku do phone a mobil do mobile.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mobile
eggie (2024-01-29 07:39:49+00:00): Hi Meenakshi

Welcome to OSM. 
If this is a real shop to visit in the field than it's okay, but if this is a webshop please remove your contribution.

Greetz,
eggie
Taya_S (2024-01-29 09:56:45+00:00): Could you explain what you mean by the changeset comment "This is for a POC, please permit."?
eggie (2024-01-30 08:14:53+00:00): Removed supermarket in familyhouse..
No reply at questions.
Greetz,
eggie
dvdhoven (2024-01-29 10:08:37+00:00): Ik heb 53-70 hersteld net als de situatie bij knoop-punt 52.
Het is al vaker gezegd, met ID kun je geen routes bewerken. ID is een simpele routemoordenaar.
Als je met routes wilt werken, zit er niets anders op dan met JOSM te starten.
En backward slaat niet op de terugrichting maar op hoe je rijdt tov de tekenrichting van de weg.
Dus al die backwards in de route heb ik in forward veranderd. De terugrichting gaat over eenrichting paden en met backward zou je tegen de richting van de weg ingaan en dat kan niet. Backward wordt maar heel weinig gebruikt, forward veel meer.
En de terugrichting begint op het zelfde punt waar de heenrichting begint en loopt tegen de rijrichting in. 
Dat hebben ze bij ID nooit begrepen en ID kiepert voortdurend de richting fout om, laat de terugrichting bij het begin van de terugrichting beginnen en dat is fout.
GPX Speedtag (2024-01-29 10:16:26+00:00): Wie past het dan wel aan?
Het moet toch aangepast worden.
Backward en forward stond al zo bij de parelhof.
Heb ik niet gedaan.
Ik ga geen programma's installeren die niet betrouwbaar zijn.
En het werkte toch na het aanpassen?
dvdhoven (2024-01-29 11:22:24+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast. Bij de rotondes stond backward als rol en dat klopt niet, verder was de volgorde verkeerd van de terugrichtng.. backward bij de Parelhof klopt, daar rij je tegen de tekenrichting in. Dat kan ook, het is een tweerichting stuk
53-70 is nu weer goed.
dvdhoven (2024-01-29 11:26:57+00:00): Het werkte niet na het aanpassen. knooppuntnet gaf aan dat de route onderbroken was. Logisch als je backward gaat gebruiken op een eenrichting weg.

En als je de volgende keer zoiets hebt, dan kun je een PM sturen of een note plaatsen, dan pak ik het op.

En JOSM is geen onbetrouwbaar programma. Het is zo betrouwbaar als wat, ik ben nu 8 jaar een zeer tevreden gebruiker. Voor het meeste werk in OSM is JOSM de enige tool,
GPX Speedtag (2024-01-29 11:44:07+00:00): JOSM werd altijd gebruikt om anderen te hacken.
Op dit moment is het nog steeds gebouwd op Java en dus nog steeds niet helemaal betrouwbaar.
Het heeft in ieder geval nog steeds een slechte reputatie.

Bij de Parelhof vanaf de rotonde is het ook een eenrichtingsstuk.
Dat stuk heb ik gewoon overgenomen maar dan nu vanaf de Dirk Camphuysenstraat; het fietspad aan de westzijde.

Het kan zijn dat de vorige het dan ook verkeerd heeft gedaan maar ik heb i.i.g. dezelfde volgorde aangehouden en dezelfde tekst.
ivanbranco (2024-02-29 17:41:52+00:00): Ciao ross-map,

qual é la differenza tra https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11563446229/history e https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223509637 ?
LockOnGuy (2024-02-10 11:38:06+00:00): Hello iran map 28, please do use meaningful changeset comments - “(no comment)” does not help other mappers understand what you are doing.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Regards.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-18 20:46:06+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243979120/history has shop = épicerie that was added in this edit
shop=épicerie ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
stoerte (2024-02-05 03:46:23+00:00): Grüße.
Ich beobachte, dass du dich in letzter Zeit gehäuft in Dessau mit positiven Changesets einbringst. Allerdings frage ich mich bei diesem, ob es nicht geeigneter gewesen wäre, den alten POI an den neuen zu verschieben. Schließlich ist der Laden immer noch ein und der selbe, nur an einer anderen Stelle. Der Historie halber fände ich es geeigneter, würde man diese auch im Nachgang noch einsehen können.
Ich weiß ja nicht, wie du das siehst. Mich würde dahingehend auch mal dein Standpunkt interessieren. :D

~ stoerte
robmai25 (2024-02-05 13:29:50+00:00): Hallo stoerte,
es freut mich, dass dir meine Änderungen in Dessau positiv aufgefallen sind. Bezüglich der von dir angemerkten Änderung muss ich dir Recht geben, dass es an dieser Stelle sinnvoller gewesen wäre, den Punkt lediglich zu verschieben und die Adresse zu ändern. Daran habe ich beim vornehmen der Änderung nicht gedacht. Kommt nicht wieder vor :)
Grüße 
robmai25
Frans S (2024-01-30 13:49:18+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped buildings. ( complex buildings)
many buildings not squared


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146808887
Frans S (2024-01-30 12:41:38+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings not accurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146808969
Frans S (2024-01-30 13:09:07+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Collected multiple buildings in 1 mapping
Buildings not squared


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146809063
mikkolukas (2024-09-07 17:18:47+00:00): Du er kommet til at tagge hele Aalborg Universitets område som om det var en public_transport=platform 😅

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49187636/history/15

Jeg har rettet fejlen 😉
Frans S (2024-01-30 12:50:24+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Building not accurate mapped.
Buildings often not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146809155
Frans S (2024-01-30 12:47:46+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, buildings often not squared !

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146809237
Frans S (2024-01-30 12:54:00+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Connected nodes of buildings to other features
Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146809243
Syl (2024-04-22 15:04:10+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai supprimé l'arrêt "Vezin /Trois Marches" qui n'existait pas sur le terrain. Je n'ai pas copié la réference "ref:FR:ILLENOO2" sur l'arrêt "Trois Marches" étant donné quelle en a été supprimé dans ce groupe de modifications. Je vous laisse voir si il y a quelque chose à changer.
Frans S (2024-01-30 12:15:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please do not connect nodes of buildings to other features like roads.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2024-01-30 12:20:16+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings not squared.
Connected nodes of buildings to other features.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146809280
Norbert Dichter (2024-01-30 17:23:59+00:00): Norbert Dichter commented 2 hours ago

Hi @BodomAfterEight , thank you for your contribution. I see a lot of buildings have not right angles, they are not squared.

In iD: draw an area and label it as Building, then correct for right angles with the Q key. Most buildings are rectangular so make buildings rectangular even if a shadow, tree or roof pitch make it appear otherwise.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146809305
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-29 08:30:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Cisowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11563522251

"Limbacha":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11563525185

"Malwowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/981294796

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
szydzio (2024-01-29 08:54:14+00:00): Brakujące dane uzupełnione w zestawach zmian: 146811175 + 146810923
Map_HeRo (2025-04-09 19:06:23+00:00): Hallo _klaas_, Du hast zuletzt die STEGAL bearbeitet. Ich habe zwischen der Station Wölfershausen (Gascade) und Vitzeroda (Ruhrgas) diverse Pipeline-Marker gemappt, die den Verlauf der beiden parallel verlaufenden Leitungen anzeigen, wobei die Gascade_Marker m.W. zur STEGAL gehören. Anhand der Marker könnte man die Trasse präzisieren, aber ich will da nicht selber dran rumfummeln, habe andere Interessenschwerpunkte.
Gruß Mikke
_klaas_ (2025-04-10 08:56:41+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, sehr hilfreich
Map_HeRo (2025-04-14 17:47:08+00:00): Leitung schon angepasst, das ging ja fix. Ich habe bei Abteroda noch ein paar Marker und eine kleine Gascade-Station ergänzt, das ist jetzt erst mal alles. Wenn ich bei Gelegenheit da mal weitermache, gebe ich Dir Bescheid.
ZinaidaZ (2024-03-15 11:09:18+00:00): Добрый день! В этом пакете правок Вы перерисовали дома методом удаления (что не особо приветствуется) и потеряли информацию об этажности. Не могли бы Вы восстановить информацию об этажах
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243987485
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243987486
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243987491
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243987490
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243987489

Заранее спасибо,
Зинаида

PS Также я вижу, что вы активно картографируете, но используете редактор iD. Возможно Вам будет интересно познакомиться с редактором JOSM (https://habr.com/ru/companies/vk/articles/548964/)
eggie (2024-01-29 08:52:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  De wegklasse heb ik aangepast naar highway=service

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
osmviborg (2024-01-29 08:53:56+00:00): man_made=cutline
Xvtn (2024-01-29 15:26:57+00:00): I checked your edits on this changeset as well, since you requested a review. Everything looks great! Good job on the changeset description - that makes the community part of OSM run a lot smoother.
Thanks again for your contributions, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Kovoschiz (2024-01-29 09:57:38+00:00): Please don't copy the project title. This was already correct. `name=` is for proper names only, not a descriptor label. It should reflect what is being constructed finally. Prepositions, commas, addresses, and brackets etc are inappropriate.
Kovoschiz (2024-01-29 10:00:13+00:00): 2. `operator=` is not suitable  for roles in the construction works. That should be `developer=` ,  `architect=` , ,`builder=` , etc. At most, it's an `owner=` .
Andrea Musuruane (2024-02-05 18:12:38+00:00): Ciao. I numeri civici rossi non sono mappati correttamente. La regola in Italia è che si inseriscono come "numero SPAZIO rosso": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses#Regole_specifiche_per_l'Italia Ciao, Andrea
Fizzie-DWG (2024-02-01 22:53:20+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15647
mueschel (2024-04-14 13:10:45+00:00): Hi,
where did you find this information?  AFAIK the original naming was correct.
Xvtn (2024-01-29 15:23:02+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Everything looks good to me, no complaints! One minor pointer is that perhaps the large outer parking area could be changed to highway=services. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservices

Thanks for your contributions!