piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Protoxenus (2024-08-12 12:54:28+00:00): Ich versuche mal, das zu rekonstruieren:
Ich hatte am Großen Stern Fotos gemacht und dort war kein Verbot für Fahrräder zu erkennen.  Das Verbot für Motorfahrzeuge ist sinnlos, da in deutschen Wäldern das Fahren mit Motorfahrzeugen (außer E-Bikes) sowieso nicht erlaubt ist. Der Beginn der Kernzone war meiner Erinnerung nach auf der Nordseite des Weges. 
Gruß Protoxenus
Mammi71 (2024-08-12 20:41:40+00:00): Hallo Protoxenus, die Begründing kann ich zwar nachvollziehen, aber vielleicht schaust Du Dir noch mal Deine Fotos genauer an. Heute war ich nicht am Großen Stern, sondern am anderen Ende am g-Gestell. Dort befindet sich ein enges Drängelgitter aus Holz und ein Holzschild, das Fahrradfahren untersagt. Ich bin mir Sicher, dass vor zwei Jahren am anderen Ende am Großen Stern die Situation gleich war, sonst wäre ich den Mecklenburger Weg langgefahren. Das Drängelgitter dort ist sogar seit 4 Jahren gemappt. Bilder von heute werden gerade hochgeladen (Mapillary). Würde mich arg wundern, wenn das jetzt anders wäre.
Mammi71 (2024-08-12 20:51:40+00:00): Das H-Gestell hattest Du auch geändert. Das H-Gestell ist ein relativ breiter Weg, der am östlichen Ende an der "Nordseite" mit VZ 238 in Normgröße ausgeschildert ist (Foto folgt). Der Rad- und Wanderweg befindet sich als Pfad zwischen "Nordseite" und g-Gestell südlich des H-Gestell, zwischen g-Gestell und Großem Stern nördlich vom H-Gestell und trifft am westlichen Ende nahezu an der gleichen Stelle mit H-Gestell und Mecklenburger Weg zusammen.
Mammi71 (2024-08-12 20:52:51+00:00): Foto Schild Mecklenburger Weg: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1018430673075241
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=886735386606654
Mammi71 (2024-08-12 20:58:39+00:00): Das H-Gestell von Osten: https://westnordost.de/p/232012.jpg
Protoxenus (2024-08-13 07:48:38+00:00): Also:
meine Fotos kann ich mir nicht mehr angucken, weil ich alles, was nur dem Kartieren dient, wieder gelöscht wird. Das hat zwei Gründe: 
-Datenschutz
-Platz auf den Datenträgern
° zum h-Gestell:
Nach der OSM-Chronik habe ich nur den südlichen Teil angefasst und dort  das foot=yes gelöscht, weil es sinnlos ist. Lt. Waldgesetz MV darf jeder den Wald betreten und ausdrücklich auch die Wege benutzen, es sei denn, es ist verboten.
Vielleicht meinst du ja den Leuchttumweg. An der Kreuzung mit dem k-Gestell stand ein entsprechendes Schild.
Und: du kannst es dir sparen, mir links zu Mappillary zu verlinken. Ich boykottiere das Zuckerberg-Imperium.
Gruß Protoxenus
Mammi71 (2024-08-17 21:14:30+00:00): Hallo Protoxenus,
nein, ich meine nicht das h-Gestell, sondern das H-Gestell: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146167474/history#map=15/54.4174/12.5286&layers=N
Ich hatte das auf bridleway geändert auf Grund dieser Beschilderung: https://westnordost.de/p/232012.jpg
Ist aber nach Information vom Nationalparkamt auch nicht ganz richtig, weil dieser Weg auch Kutschweg ist - also track, auf keinen Fall aber path.
Mammi71 (2024-08-17 21:27:56+00:00): Mecklenburger Weg: wenn Du Zuckerberg boykottierst, dann musst Du mir halt glauben. Möglicherweise hast Du es auf Deinen Fotos übersehen bzw. mit diesem Weg verwechselt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/365957374
Beide Wege gehen am Großen Stern fast gleichzeitig weg.
Vielleicht hilft Dir ein Foto von Komoot, aufgenommen am Großen Stern:
https://d2exd72xrrp1s7.cloudfront.net/www/000/1k2/ji/ji2xv838kjrogbwn7g5jhgw12od6ugn7-uhi3460732/0?width=3072&height=2304&crop=false&q=70
wkdgs (2024-04-29 07:48:26+00:00): Ich glaube du hast aus Versehen einen Weg verschoben. Da geht jetzt eine Zufahrtsstraße quer über den Bahnhof:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1219850622#map=19/51.47890/7.22263

Kannst du dir auch gut mit dem OSMCha-Link unten anschauen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150319344
unni-geo (2024-05-01 15:27:52+00:00): FYI:

Ist zurückgeschoben, siehe:

https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#150756113
Tomas Straupis (2024-04-22 08:22:45+00:00): Pakeitimas atšauktas: priežastis - sugadintas dviračių infrastruktūros žymėjimas.
Leo Slager (2024-04-22 11:11:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-04-22 11:17:17+00:00): Dag Frank,
Alle begin is moeilijk. Maar OSM hangt aan elkaar van de vele regeltjes die zijn opgenomen in de wiki.
In dit geval ontbreken de verkeersborden verboden voor fietsers. Dat er een verplicht fietspad is wordt dan aangegeven met bicycle=use_sidepath.
De wegen waren dus correct getagd.
ik draai deze changeset dus even terug om de correcte tagging weer te herstellen..
Laat dat je niet weerhouden om verder te mappen.
elkanfrank (2024-04-22 12:40:52+00:00): Dag Leo, dank voor de verheldering. Ik had de tag use_sidepath niet goed begrepen denk ik. `bycicle=no` mag dus alleen gebruikt worden als er een expliciet verboden voor fietsers bord staat.
elkanfrank (2024-04-22 12:45:36+00:00): Ik heb nog een vraag hierover: navigatie apps (in dit geval Komoot), routen fietsers in sommige gevallen niet over het fietspad, maar over de weg ernaast - omdat deze dus niet als verboden voor fietsers staat gemarkeerd. Maar dit zou gevaarlijke verkeerssituaties op kunnen leveren, omdat de weg smal is en het de bedoeling is dat je over het fietspad rijdt. Is hier binnen OSM iets aan te doen? Of is dit meer een zaak voor de gemeente bijvoorbeeld, om er een verboden voor fietsers bord neer te zetten? Groet! Elkan
Leo Slager (2024-04-22 15:51:09+00:00): Inderdaad, bicycle=no alleen gebruiken als er een verkeersbord staat.
In het geval Komoot over een highway routeert zou je als mapper het volgende kunnen controleren:
Is het een verplicht (brom-) fietspad (bord G11 of G12a)
Zo ja, is dan de naastliggende way getagd met bbicycle=no of =use_sidepath.
Is de tagging van de wegen juist dan zou Komoot ook juist moeten routeren.
rskedgell (2024-04-22 10:12:45+00:00): In your edit, you carelessly dragged a node on a cycleway from Thurlow Park Road, across West Dulwich Station onto Glazebrook Close.

This would be bad enough, but in response to potential errors raised by the iD editor, you added railway crossing nodes in the middle of West Dulwich station. These crossings obviously do not exist and there can be no excuse for you to damage the map simply in order to clear an error message.

OpenStreetMap is used by real-world routing applications. It is not a toy and careless edits have consequences.
rskedgell (2024-04-23 11:22:46+00:00): Building outlines reinstated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150390234
cuzi (2024-04-21 22:09:39+00:00): What's the purpose of this change?
cuzi (2024-04-22 17:26:37+00:00): I have partially reverted your changes, because you accidently changed the administrative border of "Tirupati (Rural)" https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10233194
pitscheplatsch (2024-04-22 18:55:10+00:00): Hi Jalium, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind removing several mapped driveways? Thanks.

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=150320974#18/33.68208/-112.18814
Jalium (2024-04-22 19:00:45+00:00): My reasoning was for consistency in the residential area and the fact that the buildings are located relatively close to the primary street. I would use a driveway for a home that is located a further distance from the primary street, is not obvious, or is obscured.
marc__marc (2024-09-30 23:56:08+00:00): Bonjour Mr l'ingénieur.
en connaissance de cause mais sans connaitre les habitudes osm :)
la valeur du bâtiment décrit apparence
"terraind e basket" n'est pas une apparence de bâtiment.
il faut donc changer cela en terrain de basket :)
et si vous le souhaitez, ajouter les bâtiments - gradin entourant le terrain
Ce serrait aussi pratique de nommer la rue Parendraru-Mramboini-Ikoni
Cordialement,
Marc
rothg (2024-04-22 21:23:07+00:00): Hey Alex,
I keep going back and forth on this one - at first glance it feels right and there's even lane markings and a yellow sign basically saying "bikes onto the sidepath please"... 

With that said, the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepath) states "This tag should only be applied in countries that have compulsory cycleways." I'm not 100% sure that biking on that side path is absolutely legally mandatory here - Oregon law famously states that it's explicitly legal everywhere except a few pieces of the interstates and Hwy 26. 

Thinking that maybe a good compromise would be to keep your bicycle=use_sidepath but to add cycleway:right=separate just to make it real clear to any software trip planners.

What do you think?

George
rothg@trimet.org
Alex Basau (2024-04-23 02:45:09+00:00): Hi George,

Thanks for checking my changes and for the feedback!

I think the use of "use_sidepath" is justified because the Oregon law ORS 814.420 (https://oregon.public.law/statutes/ors_814.420) which prohibits the use of a roadway if there is a bike lane or path.

That sidepath looks like the continuation of the bike lane so I think riding there is mandatory according to ORS 814.420. But I can be wrong.

Please let me know what you think.

Thanks again,
Alex
rothg (2024-04-25 17:08:29+00:00): Hi Alex,

All good! I was hoping there was some legal language somewhere that would clear this up, and it looks like you found it. I'm satisfied with the result now.

Thanks again,
-George
TrickyFoxy (2024-04-27 13:16:49+00:00): 👋 
Территорию школы не нужно отмечать как здание https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1274737052
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-22 06:01:58+00:00): Individual trees should be mapped as nodes, not tiny woods.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150321634
percypyan (2024-04-22 07:22:07+00:00): Oh sorry, thanks for letting know! Note taken, I will update that soon!
rainerU (2024-06-21 09:47:35+00:00): Hallo osm-pt-account 😎, 
Du hast mit diesem Changeset junction=roundabout von einem Kreisverkehr entfernt. Das ist nicht korrekt und zerstört das Routing vieler Anwendungen. Mir ist aufgefallen, dass du das immer wieder mal machst. Andere Mapper müssen das dann wieder korrigieren. Das ist nicht besonders kooperativ. Ich bitte dich daher, das zukünftig zu unterlassen.

Gruß
rainerU
osm-pt-account 😎 (2024-07-05 15:45:29+00:00): Sorry, I won't do it anymore.

osm-pt-account 😎
JezCrow (2024-04-22 15:35:50+00:00): Hi DorneyLake123, I'd be surprised if none of these postboxes are morning collections (i.e. with a "D" suffix) - are these refs from an old survey?
Kind regards,
Jez
dunkaist (2024-04-24 14:49:28+00:00): DorneyLake123, you map post boxes in very different places, what is your data source?
user_21303518 (2024-04-22 19:37:48+00:00): Essa igreja mudou o local , favor alterar o nome pada a edição que sugeri .
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-04-22 12:43:28+00:00): Please use railway=train_station_entrance
instead of subway_entrance, which is only for subway networks.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-04-22 12:43:55+00:00): You can keep the entrance tag also, since it describes the door itself
eggie (2024-04-22 06:01:17+00:00): Dag Tim  Wanneer er access private is getagd en voetgangers zijn toegestaan is de juiste tag permissive.
Dat routeert ook.
MVG
eggie
Timmido (2024-04-22 11:53:11+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

Bedankt voor de info.

MVG,
Tim
tekim (2024-04-23 13:46:00+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Thanks for your edit to the map.  Unfortunately, when editing OpenStreetMap, we are not allowed to use Google Maps due to Google's Terms of Service.
tekim (2024-04-23 13:46:17+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150396789
MxxCon (2024-04-23 05:05:38+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate what is the source of this data? It doesn't seem to match with the office NYC department of buildings data.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150324471
MxxCon (2024-04-23 05:14:06+00:00): Hello.
Please note that craft=scaffolder is intended for the company office. This is not how you map sidewalk sheds/scaffolding.

Additionally, there's no need to add "addr:unit=1FL" to biz just because it's on the first floor, unless that is actually part of the official address of that biz.
And if you want to indicate the floor number that is part of the address, it should be tagged as addr:floor=. You can read more about this at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:*
👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150324560
bhuang8450 (2024-04-26 19:42:41+00:00): got it thanks
Quimby5 (2024-12-26 05:53:06+00:00): Hi Dave, I couldn't help notice that a big part of this changeset was to change all the bicycle=yes tags to bicycle=mtb.  This is not a correct use of the tag ... bicycle=* tag is meant for legal restrictions to bicycles, not what type of bicycle to use on the trail.   Please see the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle

Why did you decide to do this change?
Quimby5 (2025-03-02 01:19:22+00:00): Hearing no reply, I am proceeding with reverting this changeset.
fortera_au (2024-04-22 03:18:39+00:00): Hey, I reckon the name and shop tag should probably come off the land use entirely, those would be more appropriate on the building (and it looks like the name is already tagged on something else so that goes against one object, one feature).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150324901
Joel Koen (2024-04-22 03:28:50+00:00): I agree that the name should be on only one object, but should it go on the land use instead? The map includes the surrounding area like Hungry Jacks and the parking lot: https://inglefarmplaza.com.au/centre-map/
fortera_au (2024-04-22 04:24:58+00:00): It's a bit tricky, might be worth looking at some other shopping centers with extra shops in the carpark and see how they handle it.
Joel Koen (2024-04-22 04:43:17+00:00): Seems like shopping centres that have their own separate block have their tags on their landuse, so I've moved them: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150326333
fortera_au (2024-04-22 05:11:33+00:00): Yeah definitely makes sense in those cases, only obvious exception I can think of is Munno Para Shopping City, that's a weird one!
Joel Koen (2024-04-22 05:31:34+00:00): Wow, that's probably the biggest shopping ~~centre~~ city I've ever seen...
fortera_au (2024-04-22 05:42:09+00:00): Yeah, it's an odd one, multiple expansions that I think most people consider part of the same retail precinct, but somewhat separate to the main shopping centre.
Jonathan Haas (2024-04-22 12:48:10+00:00): Hallo Palary, wieso hast du hier layer=1 gelöscht? Der iD-Editor warnt jetzt, weil die Straße das Gebäude auf gleichem Layer kreuzt.

(Gegen das  Hinzufügen von level=1 habe ich nichts einzuwenden.)
skyper (2024-04-22 13:06:11+00:00): Hallo Palary,
siehe auch https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/102994/4 und folgende.
Leider hast Du die Situation verschlechtert und eher Probleme erzeugt anstatt zu beheben. Das `layer=1` war doch korrekt. `level=1` kann richtig sein, aber vielleicht ist es auch ein höherer Wert.  Wie hast Du den Wert nur anhand von Luftbildern erkennen können?

Leider scheint nicht nur dieser Änderungssatz betroffen zu sein, daher bitte ich Dich alle Deine Änderungen betreffend "Fixed building & highway intersections " erneut zu überprüfen und mitzuteilen, wann die Überprüfung (plus Korrekturen) abgeschlossen ist.

Grüße skyper
Palary (2024-04-22 17:16:49+00:00): Hi Jonathan Haas and skyper,
Thank you for your feedbacks. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
Palary (2024-04-26 05:18:54+00:00): Hi Jonathan Haas and Skyper, 

Thank you for your valuable feedback, I am revisiting all my changesets and make the corrections where neccessary. I will revert my changes back to the original setting.
pfg21 (2024-04-24 09:09:52+00:00): не надо делать заливку больших площадей одним и тем же "тегом".
это в корне направильно.
Реdактор (2024-04-24 09:11:44+00:00): Я мультиполигон делаю
Реdактор (2024-04-24 09:15:35+00:00): Я не собираюсь всё заливать
Реdактор (2024-04-24 09:15:43+00:00): Спасибо, учту
aixbrick (2024-04-22 13:40:27+00:00): Why did you change layer to level?
Palary (2024-04-22 17:15:17+00:00): Hi aixbrick,
Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
Palary (2024-04-26 11:26:08+00:00): Hi aixbrick, 
I referred wiki page and replaced layer tag with level tag for highway. We understand your point, we are going to make some changes to the business logic and we will be reaching out to you for your feedback. In the meantime we will be reverting the updates that we made back to the previous setting.
aixbrick (2024-04-26 12:14:22+00:00): Thank you
Supaplex (2024-04-22 06:04:01+00:00): 太魯咎->太魯閣
Kovoschiz (2024-04-22 16:12:29+00:00): Please don't delete `=footway` connected to a `=pedestrian` . They are needed to make crossing across it anywhere work.
Kovoschiz (2024-08-21 11:16:14+00:00): 2. You need to enclose `building:part=` inside the `building=` . If they are outside for any reason, you need to create a `type=building` with them as `part` and `outline`
Ewrt1 (2024-05-07 02:05:42+00:00): Hi PinRPG,
You unabbreviated road names. Please note that there are tagging guidelines in this city which doesn't put unabbreviations.

This changeset is reverted.
Ewrt1 (2024-05-07 02:06:15+00:00): reverts openstreetmap.org/changeset/150326495

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150988040
eggie (2024-04-22 05:59:08+00:00): Dag Mervyn

De maxspeed is niet erg consistent hier. maxspeed 50 met een klein stukje 30 ertussen?  Kijk je nog een keer?

MVG
eggie
HellMap (2024-04-22 10:12:11+00:00): Čau!

Vai tur uz https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60963249 parkinga plāksnes vai norādēm nebija norādīti mēneši vai tā arī bija rakstīts "vasarā"? Es pieliku aptuvenus mēnešus pagaidām.
artuuurs (2024-04-22 15:27:21+00:00): Sveiciens!

Zīme ir "P maksas", gāju jautāt par apmaksu un man atbildēja, ka nesezonā par brīvu, ka maksa būs "pēc Jāņiem". Precīzākas informācijas man nav :)
mavl (2024-04-22 13:22:40+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок правок заменил на здании школы тег building=school на на тег building=yes. Напишите, пожалуйста, зачем?
MooPoo7 (2024-05-06 17:22:14+00:00): Please make sure your edits are accurate. You replaced a business that still exists (and accidentally kept their business hours) because you added your business to the wrong building. I moved your business to what I believe is the correct building and restored the business that you replaced, but please be more careful in future edits.
Florek89 (2024-04-25 09:24:51+00:00): Nie wszystkie budynki są wyburzone i sprzedane pod CPK. Jechałem tędy dwa dni temu dosłownie w celu zwiedzenia okolicy, w której kiedyś mieszkałem.

Proszę o wycofanie zmian lub podanie informacji na jakiej podstawie zmieniono landuse.
adas (2024-04-26 07:27:58+00:00): https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/polska-centralny-port-lotniczy-wątek-merytoryczny-polityka-wieści-od-horały-brig.165614/page-426#post-188189136
Na podstawie tego. Ale ok. Cofnę zmiany.
Florek89 (2024-04-27 09:01:05+00:00): Wyczółki 2 były wyburzone, ale zmieniłeś też landuse Wyczółek 2A + budynek na południe od nich (stodoła) należy do 2A i też stoi. Wyczółki 1 też stały i nie widziałem, żeby było spalone, ale tam jest wysoki płot i mogłem nie zauważyć.

Więc Wyczółki 2 wyburzone, ale nie 2A.
Mogę też powiedzieć, które zabudowania we wsi obok (Strumiany) są wyburzone, bo tam mieszkałem i czasami przejeżdżam zobaczyć co się zmienia. Ale to tylko jeśli chcesz, to mogę adresy podać (na większość mam też nagrania sprzed kilku dni).
adas (2024-04-27 12:54:25+00:00): W sumie z chęcią. Może najprościej będzie jak te wyburzone podrzucisz np. uwagami na mapie.
Ale jak będzie prościej ci podać numery to też spoko:)
Florek89 (2024-04-28 12:59:17+00:00): No łatwiej mi numerami:
Na pewno wyburzone numery w Strumiany (wieś na zachód od Wyczółek):
34
34a
21
20
19
18
8
zabudowania obok adresu 8 na wschód bez adresu
3

Wyczółki:
32A
21A
21C
13B
13
12
11
9
8
7
6
2

Tych jestem pewien, więc tylko te podam, a jakbym jechał tam w przyszłości to dodam uwagami.
MxxCon (2024-04-23 05:19:43+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate where did you add weight restrictions?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150327769
anurasij (2024-04-23 05:44:39+00:00): Hello,

I have added HGV=delivery tag on the segment https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1274776510#map=19/40.67621/-73.91651 based upon the bing streetview present at the location https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=40.676598%7E-73.916481&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=1&pi=-8.1&style=x&dir=157.8, please let me know if you need any other details.

Regards,
anurasij
MxxCon (2024-04-23 05:48:30+00:00): Ah, alright. Based on your changeset comment I thought you added maxweight= tag but I couldn't find it.
👍
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-27 08:11:31+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is not in-between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. #Osmcha#OMGuru

Please Draw the Accurate shape of the Building. And Please confirm when you are Going to Draw a Building, whether It is a separate building or another Building is Very close there if another Building is very close Draw Separately!  Don't connect them. 
Try to Draw accurate Square-shaped Buildings. Use the "Q" Key to Change your building as Square.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150327848
NeisBot (2024-04-23 05:34:02+00:00): Hello Ilya_Puchcow, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-22 08:35:39+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150334254
EneaSuper (2024-04-22 12:08:58+00:00): Ciao Caster89, hai fatto un buon lavoro a parer mio.

Mi viene da pensare che, in qualche modo, tu frequenti questo ospedale. Forse saresti in grado di mapparlo maggiormente, dati anche i cantieri di riqualificazione e potenziamento che sta avendo da meno di un mese ad oggi?

Fammi sapere 😊
Caster89 (2024-04-22 12:31:36+00:00): Diciamo che ho occasione di vederlo anche se non benissimo.So un po cercando di aumentare un poco i dettagli. Per ora non ho troppa visibilità sulla parte dei lavori purtroppo
EneaSuper (2024-04-22 15:21:54+00:00): Capito, grazie comunque per il tuo contributo 😊
mcliquid (2024-04-22 08:00:53+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
errezz (2024-04-22 14:04:10+00:00): Oh, I know... I just showed streetcomplete to a friend and forgot to sync before he made the changes in his parents village...
ivanbranco (2024-04-22 08:12:55+00:00): Hi Map-Finder,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1274789150

please, as someone already told you, do not add fake objects to the database
user_9221753 (2024-04-22 09:18:30+00:00): I explained pricesly the reason of making these circles.
Except of some samples that i must sace somehow, there is not other way to save then, all the rest are temporary placed till i finish the project i began.
Is it clear now?