piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bernward1 (2025-12-09 16:55:29+00:00): I don't know it. I only know that the grade changed on the way when I walked there along to add the missing ways to OSM.
I added the grades to the way, because the one part to the shelter has grade1-2 and the other 4. So you can descide which way to use.
In my opinion, dividing the way (grad1-2) into two sections does not offer any additional advantage. It just means more data.
BCNorwich (2025-10-05 06:33:17+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've tweaked the building outline.

Regards Bernard.
Brendan_07 (2025-10-07 04:52:12+00:00): Thank you so much for your contribution. I made a minor edit, but overall you had the most important info already and then some.
eggie (2025-10-04 21:11:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Pooko (2025-10-04 21:43:49+00:00): Bedankt eggie! Is deze bijdrage nu 'goedgekeurd'? En zo ja, hoe kan ik dit zien? Ik ben benieuwd. Ik kijk er naar uit om er meer gebruik van te gaan maken.
eggie (2025-10-04 21:49:40+00:00): Hoi... Nou er wordt niets goedgekeurd. 
Alles wat je maps staat direct in osm.
Er wordt wel door ervaren mappers gevalideerd en evt verbeterd.
Even ctrl f5 toetsen... je cache leegmaken. Dan zie je effect.
Veel plezier met mappen.
eggie
felipeeugenio (2025-10-05 15:00:59+00:00): Hola Bruno. Una cosa es que la calle tenga una boca ancha para su acometida a otra calle, y otra es que haya un link adicional y separado en una calzada única. En este caso eso no se ve en las fotos.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172845013
pwbriggs (2026-07-07 16:00:54+00:00): Thanks. Do you mind pointing me to the discussion regarding these alternate gtfs:*=* tags, and updating the Washington public transit wiki page so that I know the canonical way to do this?
Itserpol (2026-07-09 19:44:13+00:00): I don't mind at all!

The GTFS wiki page describes the preferred way to format gtfs tags (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GTFS) with step 4 explicitly stating that the feed ID should be included as a suffix in the tag's key. Further, gtfs:feed=* is specifically marked as deprecated on its wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:gtfs:feed) with the discussion (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:gtfs:feed) going over the rationale for the deprecation.

And I didn't know WA had a dedicated transit page on the wiki, so thanks for letting me know! I'll do my best to edit it.
pwbriggs (2026-07-09 20:05:32+00:00): Yeah https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Washington/Public_Transport is the main page. As far as I know it was originally a project by https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Lumikeiju but mostly stalled. Each agency has a sub-page that should have the agency-specific stuff, and lists the status of every route the agency operates. I learned about these wiki pages a few months ago and have done some cleanup of a few (mostly KCM) routes, but there's still a huge amount of work that could be done to make our PT data more pristine.
Lumikeiju (2026-07-09 21:31:06+00:00): Hi! Yes, those WA public transport pages were, as pwbriggs said, a project started by me and never finished.

We discussed the "gtfs:*=*" switch in a different changeset of Itserpol's, and I agree that it's the best way forward. Feel free to edit the Wiki accordingly, or I will get around to it at some point.

I find PTNA (https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/US/WA/US-WA-KCM-Analysis.html) to be the best QA queue to work from!
Paul Flo Williams (2025-10-04 22:34:05+00:00): Philip,
I've reverted your change to Meadow Cottages in Woodingdean. They already have addr:substreet and addr:parentstreet: they should not also have addr:street added.
Paul Flo Williams (2025-10-04 22:35:48+00:00): Winton Cottages in Rottingdean have been similarly changed, incorrectly.
philipcullen (2025-10-25 12:10:14+00:00): That's a good spot, I'd not quite understood that the substreet and parentstreet replaced street. I'll avoid adding streets where they are present.
pertile (2025-10-06 00:56:19+00:00): No recuerdo que haya una barrera ahí ¿es nueva?
user_23328662 (2025-10-06 01:32:59+00:00): Hola. No sabría responder la antiguedad de la barrera. 

La veo hace años y confirmo mediante inspección in-situ al día 2025-10-03 que la barrera se encuentra en el lugar

Saludos
Yog Sot (2025-10-04 20:58:12+00:00): za duzo detali wcisnąłeś w to skrzyżowanie koło stawu i wcale nie wygląda lepiej
Sanniu (2025-10-05 06:17:44+00:00): Hi

This seems wrong as elevators are to connect from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/656685552 (level 1) to the street level (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457631864 is on street level)
Now elevators connect level 0 to level 0.
Trust me, I'm local and know what is going there.
Guy Kazakov (2025-10-10 09:58:46+00:00): Yes you're right the elevators should connect different levels but previously the connections were to the parallel road at the same level and not the correct road at level 0. edit as you see fit
Carto'Cité (2025-12-16 15:50:45+00:00): Bonjour.
Merci à l'avenir d'ajouter des commentaires de changeset utiles. 
Des informations sur les travaux à côté de la gare d'Écouen - Ézanville seraient très utile pour la communauté.
Cordialement,
Antoine de Carto’Cité pour SNCF #Transilien
Bernard 88 95 (2025-12-19 09:50:50+00:00): Bonjour,
je n'ai pas bien compris votre 1ere phrase du message. Mais oui des travaux d'ampleur ont été mené depuis aout ils devraient être sur le point de ce terminer pour noël , je mettrai a jour cette zone semaine prochaine. Pour info la place de la gare aussi a été complètement remaniée et n'est ou ne sera plus accessible au auto. 
Cordialement AB
Carto'Cité (2025-12-19 16:27:01+00:00): Bonjour.
Merci pour les infos sur les travaux. 
La 1ere phrase signifie que le commentaire de changeset "04102025 1" n'est pas très informatif : c'est utile d'expliquer brièvement la raison des modifications, ça permet aux autres contributeurs de les comprendre, et peut éviter de se fier à l'imagerie aérienne qui peut être obsolète. 
Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Bonne fin d'année !
Antoine.
dsjagdasfd (2025-10-04 20:38:12+00:00): From signs on the ground and map data, it seems that the A519 has been rerouted along what was previously the B5043 to meet the A34 at the roundabout. Also, Friarswood Road now appears to have been declassified and now has a weight restriction applied to it.
NeisBot (2025-10-04 20:46:39+00:00): Hi 365nomads, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added bench with backrest"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
JeroenHoek (2025-10-05 06:21:10+00:00): Deze lijkt zo op het eerste oog in de categorie van zaken te vallen waar betalen ter plekke helemaal niet mogelijk is. Als dit een kantoor is zeker.

Ik zie op de website ook geen mogelijkheid om iets te bestellen voor afhalen, of überhaupt hoe je als particulier iets kan kopen.

Ik denk dat de payment-tags hier niet terecht zijn.

Als je hier wel ter plekke kan betalen, is er wellicht sprake van shop=wholesale in plaats van office=company.
Comino (2025-10-05 08:58:14+00:00): Goedemorgen Jeroen,

Ik heb de tag aangepast naar shop=wholesale. Het betalen met Bitcoin is geverifieerd. Sierd zijn eerste ontvangen betaling was deze week.

Edwin
pertile (2025-10-06 00:55:28+00:00): Hola, la superficie es concrete no gravel en este punto. Además no corresponde name "Entrada/salida de bomberos", si querés aclarar la función podés usar "description", name es para cuando efectivamente se llama así.
user_23328662 (2025-10-06 01:44:41+00:00): Hola, gracias por los detalles. Actualizada.
user_23328662 (2025-10-07 11:19:48+00:00): @pertile: en el futuro, mejorar la forma de redactar las sugerencias a nuevos participantes. Pensé que Google Maps era restrictivo pero observo que aquí el trato no es diferente.

Buscaré otros mapas.
Glassman (2025-10-05 20:51:10+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172847670
ljc_jlyb (2025-10-05 14:34:54+00:00): Badly translated changeset comment?
eggie (2025-10-05 06:29:22+00:00): Hoi poko..
De format gaat dan als volgt..

Two services on Sunday might be represented as =Su 09:00,18:00 .. even als voorbeeld uit de wiki.

Dus alle UK English.
Kijk je nog even?
Gr eggie
user_5359 (2025-10-05 07:07:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/5481534873 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
Comino (2025-10-05 08:46:31+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
archie (2025-10-04 22:32:24+00:00): Varför ändrar du hastighetsgränsen för gångfartsvägar från etablerade "walk" till 7? Jag kan inte se att denna hastighetsbegränsning finns skyltad där. Är framförande av mc förbjudet där? Mc kan nämligen inte köras - upprätt - i 7 km/h. Med tanke på att hastighetsgränsen inte finns skyltad på platsen undrar du hur du kommer fram till just 7 km/h. Varför inte 11 km/h?
YraFyra (2025-10-06 20:02:50+00:00): Hej,
Det är skyltar för gårdsgata runt hela detta område. Gårdsgata betyder gångfart vilket av många klassas som max 7km/h.
Jag letade på osm wiki och hittade att "walk" bara var en proposed feature.
Allt detta i kombination med att OsmAnd ville att jag skulle köra inom  området gjorde att jag ändrade.
Det är ok för mig om du verkligen vill ändra tillbaka.
archie (2025-10-06 22:15:55+00:00): Tack för ditt svar! Gångfart tolkas alltifrån 5 till 50 km/h här i Sverige. Det är lite olyckligt att man inte håller sig till "walk" = gångfart. 
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2d8G
wies1 (2025-10-05 08:25:11+00:00): Hallo,
es ist gut, dass du hier die Adressen ergaenzt.

Eine Frage dazu:

Verwendest du hierfür ein bestimmtes Plugin oder trägst du die Adressdaten allesamt händisch ein ?

Gruss

wies1
chris66 (2025-10-05 10:00:16+00:00): Hi, händisch im JOSM Adress-Dialog (F10) mit automatischer Hochzählung.
wies1 (2025-10-05 10:31:19+00:00): Hallo,
danke.
Und wie geht das ?
Wenn ich auf F10 drücke tut sich bei mir nichts.
Gruss
wies1
wies1 (2025-10-05 10:53:26+00:00): Hallo,
ich habs jetzt nochmal probiert - und ich bekomme es nicht hin.
Habe mal das Adressinterpolations Plugin heruntergeladen, aber auch damit klappt es bei mir nicht.
Was muss ich tun, dass es funktioniert?
Gruss
wies1
chris66 (2025-10-05 11:53:13+00:00): So sieht es bei mir aus:
https://up.picr.de/50127449oq.jpg

Rechte Maustaste auf die Symbolleiste -> "Symbolleiste konfigurieren" und dann die Vorlage "Adressen" da rein ziehen.
wies1 (2025-10-05 14:56:35+00:00): Hallo,
das hat jetzt auch bei mir funktioniert - konnte es gerade gut ausprobieren. Danke.

Gruss

wies1
gabro00 (2025-10-05 11:01:20+00:00): Menő! Mindig is ilyen napelemparkokat képzeltem el, nem tudom miért kellett ennyit várni vele :)
felipeeugenio (2025-10-05 13:22:19+00:00): Hola. Borró caminos completos. Ya no existen?

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172848669
trail-andes (2025-10-05 14:33:19+00:00): Caminos y rutas pasan por propiedades privadas con cercos y casas, no son rutas de trekking si no parcelas con propietarios. Por eso las eliminé no se puede ingresar ya que hay cercas y casas.
felipeeugenio (2025-10-05 16:29:42+00:00): Hola. Gracias por responder. 
Para eso existe el agregar tags de acceso (access=) y portones en los lugares correspondientes (barrier= + access=).

Pero no se borran caminos que existen. 

Si no sabe cómo hacerlo dejar notas en el mapa para ubicar la portones. Por lo pronto, los caminos fueron repuestos.

Saludos y gracias por su tiempo.
trail-andes (2025-10-05 19:06:35+00:00): Tienes un correo para explicarte mejor que es lo que hay que borrar? Ya que creo que no tomas en cuenta que hay caminos en este mapa que se muestran como rutas y no lo son.
felipeeugenio (2025-10-05 19:49:47+00:00): Hola. En mi perfil hay un link a un chat en Telegram. Ahí puedes adjuntar fotos y comentar lo que indicas. 
No entiendo muy bien a lo que te refieres con "ruta".
Todo es una ruta en Osm.
Saludos
felipeeugenio (2025-10-05 13:22:40+00:00): Hola. Borró cun bosque completo. Ya no existe?

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172848725
trail-andes (2025-10-05 14:41:10+00:00): Felipe buenas tardes, hay rutas que son parte de propiedades privadas, como ruta del cóndor, y otras cercanas, estos mapas son muy antiguos, seguramente se crearon cuando no había población, ahora hay casas, cercos y gente viviendo por lo que las rutas no se pueden ingresar. Es mejor avisar y evitar problemas legales ya que en los mapas hay varias rutas que no son rutas si no parte de las propiedades privadas del sector.
Saludos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172848725
trail-andes (2025-10-05 14:43:59+00:00): El bosque si existe lo que no existe son las rutas Felipe, están marcadas sobre propiedad privada, con casas, cercos existentes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172848725
zstadler (2025-10-05 05:55:53+00:00): Hello Glassman,

In this edit you have restored 267 nodes that have no tags and are not part of any way.

I assume this was not your intention.

Currently, there are 513 orphan nodes in the Gaza strip.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2d0F
It seems like the edit war concerning the IDF-declared danger zones in the Gaza Strip has unintended consequences on the OSM map :-)
Glassman (2025-10-05 20:45:35+00:00): Sorry that I missed all of the nodes. I has reverting some vandalism, which had been touched but not removed. The nodes have since been removed
zstadler (2025-10-06 06:40:08+00:00): Thanks for the cleanup!
Herman Lee (2025-10-05 21:48:51+00:00): Sorry for error editions at first. I tried to fix but some of are missed. Thanks for correcting.
lakedistrict (2025-10-05 17:00:14+00:00): Hi, did you mean to delete the InPost locker straight after adding it? The previous changesets were correct!
Adze1 (2025-10-07 22:23:13+00:00): Yes. Immediately after adding I saw that there was an Amazon locker very close by. I was driving and my passenger was talking to me when we passed, so maybe I got it wrong. I'll be passing again sometime & will pay proper attention!
lakedistrict (2025-10-26 12:39:24+00:00): I've double checked and there is also an InPost locker, remapped in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173792812
citrula (2025-10-05 06:10:48+00:00): welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. You replaced the traffic light node with the ALPR tags in this edit - I have fixed that for you.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172854498
s777n (2025-10-05 14:41:00+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы удали теги здания (building=yes) с здания. Исправил. Перенес теги карата на территорию.
user_5359 (2025-10-05 07:01:25+00:00): Hello! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/533983724
more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position. If you need help, you are welcome!
Warin61 (2026-04-07 03:42:15+00:00): You do not know how to do multipolygone relations! Still. 

Relation  19680051  has 6 member ways ..
All with the role outer! 

This is CONFUSING!
Ways  1435557829 and 1435557830 ... Is the area inside these ways meant to be tagged as ;
grass .. in which case thee are already inside the other ways so already tagged grass - thus redundant information
not grass - in this case they should have the role 'inner' 

Next issue !
Ways  1435557826, 1435557826, 1435557827, 1435557827, 1435557825, 1435557825, 1435557828 and 1435557828 can be combined into one way .. why make serval ways when one will do? 

---------------- I have been correcting quite a few of your relation entries in New Zealand that are some years old .. with similar issues.
vaibhavnz (2026-04-07 05:59:01+00:00): Okay thanks for highlighting this. I don’t really do OSM anymore but will have a peek at the wiki first if doing so in the future.
user_5359 (2025-10-05 06:59:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! 

You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/8446190304 more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position .

If you need help, you are welcome!
MassCartog (2025-10-07 20:36:29+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. In this changeset you named the feature "Dragonfly World" Could you provide a source for this information?
aixbrick (2025-10-05 11:45:14+00:00): Hello,
according to the traffic sign it is a "real" roundabout: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.820384&lng=6.3457201&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=1370345144204106.
But in OSM it should be tagged as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout on  the junction node becuase it is traversable.
Regards
LucGommans (2025-10-06 00:55:25+00:00): Huh, how did I miss that?! I know that sign is the difference between circular roads and roundabouts, so I must have specifically looked for it and not seen it somehow

Thanks for noticing my mistake so quickly! Feel free to just revert in the future, if you have the time

The highway=mini_roundabout tag you mentioned looks fitting, but the wiki says that it mustn't be used on a way. I've mapped the crossing as a node now and added this tag, since several examples I looked at on the wiki seem to confirm that this is the only right tag for this situation. Thanks again!

https://osm.org/changeset/172889976
aixbrick (2025-10-06 07:47:16+00:00): Looks good, thank you. :-)
Glassman (2025-10-05 20:50:07+00:00): #TIP: try not to add the node to an existing feature. If the other feature changes shape in the future, ungluing objects is a pain
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172852790
NeisBot (2025-10-05 04:27:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
Supaplex (2025-10-05 08:46:36+00:00): Block set: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18817

Please be aware that OpenStreetMap map what exists in reality.

FYR: osm.wiki/Disputed_territories

Dennis Raylin Chen
Data Working Group, OpenStreetMap Foundation
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172853247
Supaplex (2025-10-05 08:57:54+00:00): Bộ khối: osm.org/user_blocks/18817

Xin lưu ý rằng OpenStreetMap lập bản đồ những gì tồn tại trong thực tế.

FYR: osm.wiki/Disputed_territories

Dennis Raylin Chen
Nhóm Công tác Dữ liệu, Quỹ OpenStreetMap
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172853247
NeisBot (2025-10-05 05:06:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-12 05:19:04+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/172853559
Sylabowy Kot (2025-12-05 13:20:45+00:00): Jak to "własne" źródło?
Yunkers (2025-10-05 16:52:30+00:00): I w ten sposób skasowałeś lekką ręką pół godziny roboty.
Fajnie, że dałeś mi znać tobym poprawił.
Zmianę wycofuję. Jeżeli są błędy - popraw lub mi napissz. A na przyszłość - nie szastaj tak reverterem.
Yunkers (2025-10-05 17:08:02+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter
"Do not revert changes by other users without contacting them first in a polite way and giving them enough time to reply (one week minimum). Broken data can be fixed easily, but a broken community is not so easy to restore. :)"
TheSwavu (2025-10-05 06:48:32+00:00): Incorrect changeset comment, should have been Yakamia.
Glassman (2025-10-05 20:52:56+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172854250
Glassman (2025-10-05 20:53:03+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172854285
Glassman (2025-10-05 20:53:22+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172854490
Glassman (2025-10-05 20:53:44+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172854519
fortera_au (2025-11-10 03:21:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174443403 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
literan (2025-10-05 10:14:28+00:00): геометрия осталась без тегов. Удалить?
addr: (2025-10-07 11:10:01+00:00): Исправлено
JakubS (2025-10-05 07:20:14+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/zglaszanie-i-prosby-o-sprawdzenie-kont-edycji-uzytkownikow/110854/241
JakubS (2025-10-05 07:20:24+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/zglaszanie-i-prosby-o-sprawdzenie-kont-edycji-uzytkownikow/110854/241
save2desk (2025-10-22 05:11:32+00:00): Почему актуальные тропы были удалены и перекрыты территориями медицинского центра?
save2desk (2025-10-22 05:12:30+00:00): Уже не в первый раз замечаю очень грубые правки.
save2desk (2025-10-22 05:20:54+00:00): Почему часть веломаршрута была заменена на пешеходную дорожку, несмотря на знаки?
NikoV (2025-10-10 10:06:51+00:00): This peak is not Debelo brdo, but Višerujno.
Harald Hetzner (2025-10-10 15:04:45+00:00): According to GeoPortal DGU, the name is "Debelo brdo", see https://geoportal.dgu.hr/?view=cAGe6C1tCrAzyr1EL7L50a for reference. What is the source of the different name provided by you?
NikoV (2025-10-10 19:28:37+00:00): This is incorrect. Debelo brdo is 1597 m high peak, 400 m on SE (SE ridge of Višerujno). This peak is Višerujno, the highest peak.   
Sources:
1. https://www.hps.hr/hp-arhiva/197603.pdf (page 73)
2. https://www.hgss.hr/kartografija/ (map 18, NP Paklenica)
Please revert this change.