piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ivanbranco (2025-07-01 22:16:05+00:00): Uhm ok, I think I found it: https://tasks.mapwith.ai/projects/206

I had to search the hashtag in the wiki without the number. I still think a link to the Tasking manager in the changeset metadata would be helpful. Good mapping
dieterdreist (2025-07-03 13:32:36+00:00): Yes, good mapping yes, but bad mapping no. The task has an "urgent" badge, how on earth could this be urgent? I don't think it should be delegated to beginners, because doing it right is not easy, you have to ensure connectivity and pay particular attention to crossings. Also sidewalk properties on the road must be adjusted.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-01 19:00:55+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Orawka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/328207219
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/966139011
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1289178626

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 00:07:18+00:00): The footprint in the north is valid, accurate and appropriately squared. I do not think that the two footprints in the south represent buildings, becasue the vegetation adjacent to them appears to be too short to explain the lack of shadow visible in the imagery. Overall the orientation of all footprints is accurate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168367590
ivanbranco (2025-07-25 09:19:58+00:00): Hi, has it already been physically removed? If not, it would be better to use a lifecycle prefix like disused: instead of deleting it outright.

Chat-GPT translation:

Hallo, wurde sie bereits vollständig abgebaut? Falls nicht, wäre es besser, ein Lifecycle-Präfix wie disused: zu verwenden, anstatt sie komplett zu löschen.
Tomas Straupis (2025-07-02 08:59:51+00:00): Ne, šitas namas neturi jokio adreso.
mavl (2025-07-02 14:05:57+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет для Тюмени тег:   
  
loc_name=Первый русский город в Сибири  
  
"Первый русский город в Сибири" - это не местное название. И не название. Это исторический факт.  
  
Для Тобольска добавлен тег:  
loc_name=Жемчужина Сибири  
  
Это тоже не местное название. Это скорее туристический бренд.
Danil Moiseenko (2025-07-02 18:34:42+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Я понял. Либо поменяю на соответствующие теги, либо всё удалю вышеперечисленное. Спасибо за замечание
mavl (2025-07-03 04:52:14+00:00): Такую информацию можно добавлять в тег description с пояснениями, чтобы было понятно что имеется в виду. Почти каждый районный центр в местной прессе называет себя "Столица Сибири", "Столица Западной Сибири" или другим подобным образом.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:description
tomhukins (2025-07-02 09:08:23+00:00): Thank you for fixing this and for all your good work improving the map.

Are you sure the cafe opens at 6am as tagged in "opening_hours" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4560935418?  Its Web site at https://www.lu-ma.co.uk/ suggests it opens at 8am.
neptune_en (2025-07-02 10:28:01+00:00): when I went there in person I saw it was 6am

of course I could be wrong and I will check it again today

thanks for the notice
tomhukins (2025-07-02 10:45:45+00:00): Thank you for confirming: Web sites often contain outdated or incorrect information, so I'm sure that what you surveyed in person will be more accurate.
Joan Manel zamora (2025-07-02 07:40:23+00:00): He vuelto a poner doble sentido a la carretera , aqui son 2 direcciones , subida y bajada,   solo habia subida,  ahora esta corregido ,  zona tunel de Radio Andorra
Yog Sot (2025-07-01 20:36:15+00:00): czemu bez placu? spoko był
Feskil (2025-07-01 21:14:21+00:00): A, bo jakoś dziwnie tak nie do ulicy. A, w sumie reverta zrobię
Yog Sot (2025-07-01 22:01:19+00:00): i git
Lejun (2025-07-02 16:35:07+00:00): J'ai fait une correction, tu avais entré la barrière à côté, il faut bien la mettre sur le chemin (highway=track) autrement celui-ci reste interprété comme « ouvert à la circulation ».
Lejun (2025-07-02 16:36:00+00:00): Ici tu as bien positionné la barrière où il fallait 👍
eggie (2025-07-01 20:35:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
bartgron (2025-07-01 21:06:33+00:00): Wycofano:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168372111
bartgron (2025-07-01 21:23:29+00:00): Od mapowania fikcji jest OpenGeoFiction
Gregory Peony (2025-07-01 21:43:56+00:00): Hello, thanks for attending the mapathon today! I think that all of the footprints you added here represent buildings, and virtually all of them are accurate and appropriately shaped. I only made minor modifications to a few of them. A high quality contribution. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168370870
4004 (2025-07-06 23:26:26+00:00): здравствуйте,
в Беларуси использование highway=living street как то не прижилось, не знаю, почему - но проблем с этим тоже не вижу
aakkkaa (2025-07-09 16:31:45+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо, буду знать. Я сделал это по примеру переулка Фолюш, где тоже знак жилой зоны.
gjward (2025-07-01 21:15:24+00:00): Clarification: I cannot find any information online that there is such a place within this high school.
Minh Nguyen (2025-08-14 21:03:49+00:00): It’s a concession stand run by the Cincinnati Marlins inside Keating Natatorium. It was called the Bait Shop when I went to St. X back in the 2000s, but they might’ve renamed it since. A video of the natatorium’s recent remodeling shows a concession stand still there. [1] I restored the POI in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170455842 but retagged it as a concession stand to avoid confusion.

[1] https://www.facebook.com/shp1901/videos/st-xavier-high-school-natatorium/1065818547585793/
silversurfer83 (2025-07-02 16:58:45+00:00): Hi :)

der Hinweis im Feld "note=*" wird in den allermeisten Fällen nur in Editoren angezeigt. Kartendienste lesen diese Eigenschaft nicht aus (außer OSMAnd, wenn das OSM-Overlay aktiviert ist). Falls du diese Information also der breiten Allgemeinheit zugänglich machen möchtest, solltest du sie in "description=*" schreiben.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168371552
gudensberger (2025-07-02 23:25:30+00:00): Moin, note bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1686085755 war eher als "Rechtfertigung" für die Öffnungszeiten zu sehen, für 0815-Standarduser ist mit den Opening-Hours schon alles gemappt was wichtig ist, finde ich…

LG
silversurfer83 (2025-07-03 03:53:32+00:00): Ah. Ok. 👍🏻
SzymonH (2025-07-02 05:37:00+00:00): Dzięki za dodanie. Uzupełniłem jeszcze chodnik do klatki: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168380555
aixbrick (2025-07-02 09:58:59+00:00): Hallo,
allgemeiner Hinweis: Wenn ein Geschäft oder wie hier eine Praxis, schließt und die Räume zukünftig wieder als Geschäft/Praxis genutzt werden können, sollte ein https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix genutzt weerden, hier also "disused:amenity=doctors".
Hier hast du nun alle Tags entfernt und den Node leer stehen gelassen.
Befindet sich diese Praxis nun hier: https://mvz-wuerselen.de/?
Gruß
HaRuMi57 (2025-07-02 18:41:04+00:00): Sorry, war so ungefähr meine erste Änderung... ja die Praxis ist dorthin verzogen.
aixbrick (2025-07-03 09:01:20+00:00): Danke für die Antwort :-). Ich habe die Daten eingetragen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168434159.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-07 19:36:19+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12967280400/history has power = 22 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
larsdahlin (2025-12-07 20:00:13+00:00): Have changed osm.org/node/12967280400/history  .
It was the effect in the charging pole.
seattlefyi (2025-07-02 03:43:43+00:00): Thanks, this is helpful! Looks pretty good to me!
Patchanka (2025-07-03 13:06:12+00:00): bonjour

merci pour l'ajout de l'info sur Ask Angela ! 
Par contre, il y avait une erreur sur le wiki (maintenant corrigée), le bon tag à utiliser est : harassment_prevention = ask_angela 
(et non harassement avec un e).
Je vous laisse corriger ? Si besoin d'aide n'hésitez pas.

bonne journée
31w_ (2025-07-07 17:42:58+00:00): Bonjour, 

merci beaucoup, j'avais pas fait attention ! j'ai corrigé les tags en question. 

Bonne soirée !
eggie (2025-07-01 22:18:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-07-01 22:21:59+00:00): De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode
kabelhaai (2025-07-20 13:41:58+00:00): staat nog steeds op grb als in aanbouw geschetst ffs. Gebouw lijkt er al jaren te staan.
dentonny (2025-07-20 15:33:44+00:00): Over welk gebouw heb je het?
kabelhaai (2025-07-20 15:46:34+00:00): De hele zuidelijke rij in lara. E-B.
dentonny (2025-07-20 16:14:17+00:00): Die zijn niet zo lang geleden verbouwd he
aharvey (2025-07-02 00:44:22+00:00): Thanks for fixing this one. There still exists an amenity=shelter here, just it shouldn't be conflated with the highway=bus_stop so I've mapped it out in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1411345167
VictorIE (2025-07-03 00:15:24+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2598262365

What has happened here? :) Some railway objects look like they have been dragged / moved off the railway corridor.
itr_me (2025-07-03 12:33:22+00:00): Something that was not supposed to. This was meant to be a minor edit, localised to around Heuston, Museum, and Smithfield. I will begin the process to revert it.
itr_me (2025-07-03 12:34:19+00:00): Unintentional capturing of changes from across the city.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168442444
VictorIE (2025-07-04 10:43:33+00:00): Thanks
CAM-Gerlach (2025-07-02 04:29:54+00:00): Thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168375077
CAM-Gerlach (2025-07-02 04:32:59+00:00): Yeah, seems like it was added 7 years ago in changeset #62253586 , alongside numerous other area streets.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168375287
aharvey (2025-07-02 00:17:44+00:00): Thanks. For some of these I've used `addr:unit:designation=Shop` to try and retain that information that would otherwise be lost.

This tag hasn't been used yet, but is the best I could come up with.
tastrax (2025-07-02 04:38:19+00:00): Thanks Andrew - maybe we should also consider addr:unit:designation for other things such as Lot and Suite (which are the most common words I find in the unit fields?
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 00:35:44+00:00): The two footprints I flagged are actually pairs of buildings beside one another. I mapped them in Changeset: 168375814. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168375354
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 00:30:12+00:00): This changeset it rather large for what it contains. good changesets (saves/uploads) are thematically and geographically linked e.g. if the footprints you added fit within one screenful at a zoom level high enough to evaluate their quality. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168375399
eerib (2025-07-02 07:17:04+00:00): This might help. Here's an image with the Strava Heatmap added as background imagery to the iD editor.

https://imgur.com/a/g6rJzHw
Hawk777 (2025-07-03 04:29:38+00:00): Thank you, that looks somewhat more like what I vaguely remember on the ground, and now that I look closely, I can also see it faintly on the satellite view as well. I’ve updated accordingly.
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 00:27:24+00:00): Building footprints valid but inaccurate. I recommend that you map footprints slightly smaller than the roof you see in the imagery. Watch the beginer mistakes videos on the Missing Maps youtube channel. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168375429
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 00:24:08+00:00): This footprints looks like it should be squared by selecting it and pressing q or right clicking and selecting the square option. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168375482
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 00:20:11+00:00): Hi Ollie, welcome to OSM. The footprint you mapped here does represent a building visible in the imagery, but it is oversized and has not been appropriately squared (q). You should not include a buildings shdow in a footprint when aquiring its shape and size. See how I mapped it in Changeset: 168375583. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168375498
felipeeugenio (2025-07-02 00:27:09+00:00): Hola.
Las casas claramente no tienen esa forma. Se dibujan las estructuras.
Si lo que quiere es dejar las direcciones, dejarlas como nodos. Eso fue lo que hicimos con las otras que agregó, pero esos rectángulos simplemente no son la forma de la casa.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168375597
Matx_29 (2025-07-03 21:31:20+00:00): Hola.
Miré recién el mapa para corroborar y  está bien, quizás lo veas como raro porque usas otro tipo de mapa, yo uso Bing Maps Aerial;Esri World Imagery,

Saludos
Matx_29 (2025-07-03 21:31:49+00:00): de Todos Modos si algo está mal lo dejo como dirección nomás
felipeeugenio (2025-07-03 23:08:50+00:00): Hola. Yo uso todas esas imágenes también. 
Las casas se tienen que dibujar desde su base con estructuras por separado. No es cosa de agregarle building= al predio completo.
Es mejor, para este caso, dejarlas como nodo con la dirección solamente. 

En todo caso, por favor no hacer desplazamientos de elementos en base a las imágenes que usa, cualquiera que sean éstas. Pasa que la imagen es solo circunstancial. Van cambiando con el tiempo y todas tienen un desplazamiento. 
Es un poco más complicado y prefiero no agobiarlo con tanta información tan al principio.

Para más información de la comunidad osm Chile por favor ingresar al chat nacional en Telegram (app muy similar a WhatsApp) en el link disponible en mi perfil. 

Saludos
Alliegaytor (2025-07-04 05:06:34+00:00): Hi Lachlan,
Thanks for contributing to OSM.

In this changeset you've duplicated (19312176) the route_master relation for the Hurstbridge Line (1830850). Was this intentional? There doesn't need to be a new route_master for this line, the route variations can just be added to the old one. Also, route_master relations should not have nodes or ways in them, these should be removed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19312176 (duplicated)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1830850 (original)

Feel free to check the wiki for guidance https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route_master :)
Alliegaytor (2025-07-04 06:00:37+00:00): I've also noticed that the rail replacement bus is tagged as a train route, its stops were not in order at the top of the relation, and it was not continuous (had gaps). 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19308543

I've since those issues in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168470267

It also appears that this arrangement will only last a few weeks? If it's temporary and short lived it doesn't need to be mapped as it can be hard to update it whenever it changes. The information will quickly become out of date. It does seem that this route is used quite a bit without it changing so it's probably fine to map, but it should have some description or conditional tag to show that it is in use temporarily and only under certain circumstances.
Alliegaytor (2025-07-04 06:03:20+00:00): I didn't touch the Hurstbridge replacement bus as I'm not sure if that should even be mapped, but it currently has `route=train` which should be changed to `route=bus`
McCarte (2025-08-22 04:32:50+00:00): What was this edit?
LachlanTansey2009 (2025-08-22 09:09:55+00:00): This edit was me readding a relation, more specificly a Heidelberg - Flinders Street relation.
McCarte (2025-08-22 04:31:19+00:00): What is this edit?
LachlanTansey2009 (2025-08-22 09:07:08+00:00): Fixing relations.
McCarte (2025-08-22 04:30:57+00:00): Removing what?
LachlanTansey2009 (2025-08-22 09:08:47+00:00): This edit was when I removed the remaining incorrect relations.
F5987 (2025-07-02 00:55:02+00:00): Also moved Teriss Bar to the correct street, then mapped it.
whammo (2025-07-05 12:03:40+00:00): Hi Elijah, it looks like you removed part of the name of the D70 route. Is there a reason you did that?
willkmis (2025-07-02 02:39:50+00:00): Hey, thanks for monitoring these! Just in case you're not aware, there's an ongoing OSM community effort among locals in the area to switch the Better Bus routes in for the old routes, which we're keeping track of here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Washington_DC/Better_Bus_Network. One thing to note is that since some of the new routes closely parallel discontinued ones, it's nice to keep the old ones in OSM until the replacement route has been mapped. For instance, it was really handy to have the Z8 relation when I was mapping the new M54. I took care of the ones you deleted in this changeset earlier this evening (as maybe you saw), but just something to be aware of! Feel free to join in if you see any routes missing!
McCarte (2025-08-22 04:33:52+00:00): Why were all these stations re-built?
LachlanTansey2009 (2025-08-23 07:23:20+00:00): The station models themselves were basic with minimal detail such as shelters and other buildings present on the platform.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-08-23 23:44:08+00:00): If you find an issue with existing mapping, please DO NOT delete then remap the same thing, just fix the problem with the existing feature.
LachlanTansey2009 (2025-08-24 02:26:00+00:00): Thank you for this advise.
Alliegaytor (2025-08-24 02:51:04+00:00): I second that, please keep the history rather than recreating ways in the same location. I'd suggest checking here for why this is considered good practice

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Also I'd advise reading this to inform yourself of other such practices, such as not tagging for the renderer, and leaving good changeset comments.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
ice_fly (2026-01-02 22:48:44+00:00): These names are common to the campus
McCarte (2025-08-22 04:35:20+00:00): Why was the track 'relayed'?
LachlanTansey2009 (2025-08-23 06:01:30+00:00): This description was poorly worded. This edit was me finishing my rebuilding of the track ways to Eltham station.
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 05:41:38+00:00): I do not think that the footprints you added in the East likely represent buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168378109
felipeeugenio (2025-07-02 12:47:53+00:00): Hola. Gracias por las ediciones.
Si bien un local puede desaparecer, la dirección sigue existiendo, por lo que le pedimos por favor dejar esos datos.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168378810
Glassman (2025-07-02 23:18:14+00:00): When adding a business, try to find a tag that matches what the business is. For example healthcase=laborator and healthcare=physiotherapist.

Nodes should typically be placed inside of the building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168379126
McCarte (2025-08-22 04:35:51+00:00): What is this?
LachlanTansey2009 (2025-08-23 05:51:09+00:00): This edit was me further attempting to reorder a relation to a correct order.
Tewuzij (2025-07-02 04:37:45+00:00): Thank you so much for your service!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-02 10:49:58+00:00): the fact that bus and psv is allowed in backward direction makes it not a oneway. I will update with motor_vehicle:lanes:backward=no and bus:lanes:backward=designated.

Otherwise routing for buses and psv would be broken in almost all routing engines.
Baloo Uriza (2025-07-03 13:21:03+00:00): I'd have continued this one through the intersection since the crosswalk goes through.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168381153
FroschForscher (2025-07-02 15:14:26+00:00): Welches VZ hängt dort?
Für `access=no`, `motor_vehicle=designated` gibt es in DE kein VZ.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168381222
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-02 10:30:35+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/zglaszanie-i-prosby-o-sprawdzenie-kont-edycji-uzytkownikow/110854/209