piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Russ McD (2025-01-31 09:26:23+00:00): Paul, you are missing the point ... I'm fully aware of the Wiki (and helped in its creation)..
This is a NATIONAL road, (white sign, black letters, no province prefix).  You have treated it a as a PROVINCIAL road (blue sign, white letters, with a prefix).
Very occasionally,  NATIONAL roads do have their responsibility changed to PROVINCIAL (& vice versa), but this is very rare. 
Google streetview does show the sign as recently as 6 months ago (https://www.google.com/maps/@16.6721203,99.2768462,3a,75y,201.91h,79.61t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sQMK9duKCAZ7H6DnPgMbx2Q!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D10.385363918863035%26panoid%3DQMK9duKCAZ7H6DnPgMbx2Q%26yaw%3D201.905833071043!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDEyOC4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D).
I doubt if it has changed in the interim so to me, it should not have a province prefix added.
I trust this helps explain, but feel free to reply if not.
Russ
PaulHaag (2025-01-31 12:30:54+00:00): Russ,
thanks for your feedback.
You are absolutely right. It was I mistake and I corrected this just now.
Kind regards
Paul
eggie (2024-09-13 14:01:15+00:00): Hoi...  Wanneer er nog niets staat kan het beter nog niet renderen op de kaart m.i..
building=parking zorgt voor rendering.
Huidige situatie https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.16538,4.470942,19/?datastrip=20240906_PNEO-04

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-13 14:08:04+00:00): ... en ik den ook nog geen rendering van de naam Qpark.. anders word je op het verkeerde gezet.
Dillen GJ (2024-09-13 15:13:49+00:00): Prima, haal weg wat niet van toepassing is.
Actuelere situatie dan satalietportaal zie foto op:
https://www.carparks.nl/nieuws/nieuwbouw-parkeergarage-naturalis-leiden-van-start.
eggie (2024-09-13 15:31:05+00:00): Lijkt me voorlopig beter. Ik zag het nog niet in de BAG viewer staan, maar wellicht kun je het straks laten importeren via het forum.
Groet,
eggie
Dillen GJ (2024-09-13 15:37:12+00:00): Aanpassing gedaan
BAG import vraag staat al uit met exacte bagviewer link want hij staat al een tijdje in de BAG viewer (alleen nu met status: bouw gestart) zie BAGviewer linkje in: Project note en in BAG import-verzoek
Osmwithspace (2024-11-06 09:21:15+00:00): Bitte beachte, wie Öffnungszeiten gemappet werden sollen. Hier ein praktisches Tool:
https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/
bresomch (2024-09-13 18:44:56+00:00): Moin habi
Der Eingang für Rollstuhlfahrer (Knoten: 977379920) scheint mir so nicht zu stimmen.
Zumal hier von der linken bis zur rechten Seite des Bundeshauses  ein Fussweg unter Arkaden verläuft.

Gemäss https://www.parlament.ch/centers/documents/_layouts/15/DocIdRedir.aspx?ID=DOCID-1-6440 befindet sich der Besuchereingang für Rollstuhlfahrer auf der Seite Bundesplatz.
habi (2024-09-13 20:32:26+00:00): Ciao
Da hast du natürlich recht; eigentlich wollte ich nur ein Fehler aus der letzten Änderung dort korrigieren: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/977379920/history
Der Eingang besteht schon seit 15 Jahren dort und wurde vor einem Jahr zu einem Gebäude-Punkt umgewandelt, was sicher falsch ist.
Ich versuche das richtig zu korrigieren VO (danke für den Plan), bin aber erst wieder in ein paar Tagen an einem Kompi ;)
Gruss, Habi
bresomch (2024-09-18 19:10:54+00:00): Hallo habi
Ich hab mich mal versucht zu verwirklichen an dem Objekt und habe den Fussweg weitergeführt (Arkade), den Eingang angepasst inkl, Kontrollposten der Bundespolizei.
Was meinst du, könnte das so passen?
Gruss, Bernhard
habi (2024-10-21 20:35:04+00:00): Prima gemacht (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=156789115), mersi!
SomeoneElse (2024-09-13 09:01:03+00:00): Hello kvaziq, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
You've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12174392649 here, but that seems to be within another school - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174136303 .
Maybe they are the same one?
Best Regards,
Andy
kvaziq (2024-09-13 09:09:14+00:00): Hi, 

they are two different schools in the same building. It can be seen on this image https://maps.app.goo.gl/sGzLHBrSzyCM6tAp7

Best regards, 
kvaziq
大山かなめ (2024-09-13 08:31:19+00:00): 編集コメントに誤字がありました
「ちりん標準地図」は正しくは「地理院標準地図」です
Gwenj (2024-09-16 17:43:17+00:00): Bonjour,
Lors de ces modifications vous avez remis la portion de VL11 en piste cyclable (cycleway).
Je ne comprends pas ce retour en arrière : la VL11 a un statut de voie verte à cet endroit, raison pour laquelle je l’avais passée en unclassified, conformément à ce qui est recommandé par le wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Voies_vertes), compte tenu de son profil et de son caractère structurant.
le_geo_urb (2024-09-16 18:10:57+00:00): Parce que cet axe est dédié aux vélos. Certes, il est structurant, mais en mettant "unclassified" on perd l'information principale et importante qui est que cet axe est une piste cyclable.
Gwenj (2024-09-16 18:28:26+00:00): C’est le nœud du problème : ce n’est plus une piste cyclable mais bien une voie verte, depuis les travaux (mai-août 2024) de remplacement de la chaussée et la refonte de la signalisation, jusqu’au giratoire René-Cassin.
Le même statut de voie verte est utilisé jusqu’au stade Tisserand, à Chassieu où elle se transforme en CVCB.
rskedgell (2024-09-13 08:37:42+00:00): Already mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204068874
Peter Elderson (2025-03-03 09:08:05+00:00): Hoi @wvdp, een aantal kruisingen heb je de tag crossing_ref=delineated gegeven. Dat zegt precies hetzelfde als crossing:markings=dashes. Delineated is niet approved, gebruik ca 350 keer alleen in Nederland. Dashes is zo'n 50000x gebruikt, wereldwijd, approved. Ben jij akkkoord als ik alle crossing_ref=delineated vervang door crossing:markings=dashes?
wvdp (2025-03-06 09:59:05+00:00): hallo,

Ik heb er even naar gekeken en ik zie twee dingen. "officeel" gezien is  crossing_ref=delineated goed maar ik zie ook dat er langzaam een consesus ontstaat dat we het crossing schema moeten versimplen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing_ref=delineated

ding twee is dat tehcnich gezien SmotheFiets de crossing_ref heeft toegevoegd en ik de dashes.
https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/46934703

van mij mag het maar ik ben natuurelijk niet de baas van osm. 
Als je echt zeker wil weten dat iedereen het er mee een is moet je dit opgooien in de OSM forum
mueschel (2024-09-15 11:50:58+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier ein Tag gesetzt: 
note = free passing of about 1.2m

Das kannst du auch erfassen mit 
maxwidth:physical.
hadhuey (2024-09-17 08:55:49+00:00): Hallo mueschel, danke für den Tipp. Ich bin da gerade selbst noch am rumprobieren. Das sind schon sehr spezielle Barrieren und maxwidth gilt ja eigentlich für das geöffnete Tor. Ich habe mal eine Anfrage im Wiki gestellt, inkl Foto. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:barrier=swing_gate
ottwiz (2024-09-13 12:47:16+00:00): Thanks for the help however i'd like to note that please split the forest areas if they're around at least a tertiary road because I don't want to deal with huge multipolygons :))
I'm currently splitting up
ottwiz (2024-09-13 14:27:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156573898
Done :)
KKS (2024-09-18 11:16:21+00:00): Ти тепер після корінного Виноградарчанина і Позняківця, перетворився на корінного Львів'янина і на 100500% знаєш які там в них дороги, бо ти ж проїздив та прожив там ціле своє життя.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-16 07:56:09+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12174478020/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this edit
What kind of shop is here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting?
CloCkWeRX (2025-04-17 01:45:59+00:00): It was a weird gift shop, I've removed it for now though.
eggie (2024-09-13 09:58:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
TijsGroen (2024-09-13 10:08:24+00:00): Dankje. Ik zal het goed doornemen
gscscnd (2024-09-13 14:35:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035286347
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5064491568
Przedszkole zduplikowane.
Jordi MF (2024-09-13 22:45:29+00:00): Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).
El usuario realiza múltiples y pequeñas ediciones para dificultar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados. Los mayores errores son que modifica la toponimia oficial para que no aparezca en valenciano aunque así lo dictamine la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua en la cartografía oficial de la Comunitat Valenciana. Tenemos permiso explícito de esta entidad que, según las leyes autonómicas, es la entidad encargada de la toponimia oficial. Tampoco no tiene en cuenta la cartelería local que aparece en calles, carreteras y sendas.
Por otra parte, este usuario (y todas sus cuentas) está mapeando según las ortofotos y sin tener en cuenta el conocimiento local para delimitar si los elementos se tratan de edificios en ruinas, muros u otros elementos e, incluso, elimina PDIs con todo el historial de forma injustificada.
Ante todo lo expuesto y por las diversas anomalías, revierto todos los changesets porque, de revisar cada uno de ellos, únicamente nos dedicaríamos a ello, como si fuésemos administradores. En caso de revisar todas las ediciones de este usuario que ya ha sido bloqueado por 10 años con otras cuentas, nunca podríamos seguir mejorando la base de datos debido a revisar durante horas cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156591470
eggie (2024-09-13 09:59:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Jordi MF (2024-09-13 22:45:30+00:00): Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).
El usuario realiza múltiples y pequeñas ediciones para dificultar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados. Los mayores errores son que modifica la toponimia oficial para que no aparezca en valenciano aunque así lo dictamine la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua en la cartografía oficial de la Comunitat Valenciana. Tenemos permiso explícito de esta entidad que, según las leyes autonómicas, es la entidad encargada de la toponimia oficial. Tampoco no tiene en cuenta la cartelería local que aparece en calles, carreteras y sendas.
Por otra parte, este usuario (y todas sus cuentas) está mapeando según las ortofotos y sin tener en cuenta el conocimiento local para delimitar si los elementos se tratan de edificios en ruinas, muros u otros elementos e, incluso, elimina PDIs con todo el historial de forma injustificada.
Ante todo lo expuesto y por las diversas anomalías, revierto todos los changesets porque, de revisar cada uno de ellos, únicamente nos dedicaríamos a ello, como si fuésemos administradores. En caso de revisar todas las ediciones de este usuario que ya ha sido bloqueado por 10 años con otras cuentas, nunca podríamos seguir mejorando la base de datos debido a revisar durante horas cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156591470
TrickyFoxy (2024-09-16 11:16:57+00:00): Интересные у вас данные https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4017504321/history
rskedgell (2024-09-13 13:21:06+00:00): Hi, thanks for updating this.

If a footway or road goes through a building, you can split the section where it intersects the building and tag it with tunnel=building_passage. You don't need layer=-1 here.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage

You have also tagged ways with foot=designated + bicycle=designated, which is unlikely to be the case. An access value of yes or designated implies a legal right to use a path, and designated is slightly stronger in the UK (used for public rights of way). In these cases the value is more likely to be destination (you can use it to get to the property), permissive (you can use it as a short-cut, but that permission could be withdrawn), or private (residents only, you could also add private=residents).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#List_of_possible_values
NieWnen (2024-09-13 21:25:49+00:00): Jak coś to liczby powinny być po kropce, a nie przecinku :P

Poprawiłem.
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2024-10-03 07:56:23+00:00): Hello,
sorry, why you deleted this huge relation
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15736220
It took a lot of working hours to build. Please, be careful when you delete something
VictorIE (2025-04-07 12:05:49+00:00): Hi,

This shop node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12174468420 has building:levels=0,1

This shop node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12174590112 has building:levels = 0

Are these meant to indicate what storey(s) they are on?

Should this just be indicated by level = 0, etc ?
b-unicycling (2025-04-10 09:20:43+00:00): I can't remember ever going into Champion Sports, but H&M and TKMAxx definitely have two levels, so I presume that's what's meant there.
rskedgell (2024-09-13 13:54:01+00:00): Please don't change highway=footway or highway=cycleway to footway=path. The default access assumptions for footway are unambiguous, those for path are not. Where ways were mapped as cycleways and had access tags (which you should not have removed), this would also break cycle routing.

Unfortunately, the names of some OSM tags are a little unhelpful and counter-intuitive, but for historical reasons we're stuck with them. If it looks like a path, it's probably highway=footway. What the law defines as a footway and everyone in the UK calls a pavement is usually tagged highway=footway + footway=sidewalk.

The mappers who added these features to the map almost certainly chose footpath for a reason.

In my opinion (and other will differ here), the only good use for highway=path is for desire-line paths also tagged with informal=yes, because no access values can safely be inferred in these cases.

I have reversed your changes because it is important that cycle routes are restored before the OSM daily extracts used by routing engines are produced.
JWandel (2024-09-13 15:00:54+00:00): Thanks for that, I'm still learning my way a bit with this.  I changed the 'footpaths' to 'path' as cycling is allowed but it isn't a numbered cycle route.  Should they all be changed to cycle & footpath in that case?
rskedgell (2024-09-13 15:39:26+00:00): No problem. Where cycling is allowed, just adding bicycle=yes can be enough (or permissive, if that's the value already present for foot). You could also add segregated=no where it's a shared path.

If there's a circular blue sign explicitly permitting cycling, you could change it to highway=cycleway and add segregated=yes/no and foot=yes (this isn't strictly necessary, but someone will eventually add it anyway).
pehar_11 (2024-09-13 10:37:49+00:00): Dopuna: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156105986
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-02 23:54:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159862440, 159862427, 159862512, 159862481, 159862457, 159862433 where the changeset comment is: revert roblox_gmx edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16954
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-02 23:53:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159862440, 159862427, 159862512, 159862481, 159862457, 159862433 where the changeset comment is: revert roblox_gmx edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16954
eggie (2024-09-13 12:09:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
MichS (2024-09-16 05:31:43+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe das Öffnungszeitformat korrigiert.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

MFG
InsertUser (2024-09-14 00:36:25+00:00): Please save between edits in widely separated areas.
Piotr Strębski (2024-09-13 11:32:09+00:00): *Multi-Smak...
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-05 17:19:47+00:00): Changed this to a company office and moved it from a pond to what I presume is the main building... a little care goes a long way.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156567541
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-05 17:16:54+00:00): Changed this to a security office.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156567621
habi (2024-09-14 10:11:24+00:00): Ciao grenb
Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.
Ich habe den Verlauf des Fliederwegs in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156604753 noch etwas weiter angepasst und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1315487531 sowie die angrenzenden Häuser erfasst, die noch gefehlt haben.

Happy mapping und e Gruess us Barn,
habi
habi (2024-09-14 10:11:50+00:00): (Bärn, nid Barn 😏 )
flex16 (2024-09-13 11:44:48+00:00): Bitte in den Kommentar nicht die Quelle schreiben, sondern was du gemacht hast. :)
daniel_fulda (2024-09-13 16:19:31+00:00): Okay, danke für den Hinweis. Also zum Beispiel: "Ich habe dort eingekauft?"
Bin noch ziemlich neu hier und das sind meine ersten Versuche :)
flex16 (2024-09-13 17:38:39+00:00): Ne. :) Ich meine man schreibt da rein, was man in Openstreetmap geändert hat, damit es andere nachvollziehen können. Die Quelle kann man woanders erfassen.
daniel_fulda (2024-09-14 04:33:45+00:00): Achsoo..... Danke! :D
eggie (2024-09-13 12:18:58+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
Wanneer deze cursus structureel is kan deze uiteraard met deze naam in OSM, maar wanneer het een tijdelijk gebeuren is lijkt me dat niet de bedoeling.
Wanneer hier een atelier is dan svp onder de naam van het atelier zelf en niet van de tijdelijke cursus. 
MVG
eggie
Reinobeck (2024-09-13 13:53:28+00:00): Het gaat om een structurele cursus bij mij thuis. Niet om een atelier.
Groet,
Reino
eggie (2024-09-13 16:15:22+00:00): Duidelijk.. Bedankt voor uw reactie..
eggie
Hufkratzer (2024-09-13 20:04:12+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1315308018 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1315308020 sehen für mich aus wie Reitplätze (und nicht wie Reitanlagen, vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a/R#Reitstall). Die hast du aber als Reitanlagen innerhalb einer größeren Reitanlage https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996899122 gemappt, was mir nur schwer interpretierbar vorkommt.
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-02 23:54:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159862440, 159862427, 159862512, 159862481, 159862457, 159862433 where the changeset comment is: revert roblox_gmx edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16954
VLD280 (2024-09-17 19:37:56+00:00): Hello nicyK19!

I am reaching out to you regarding some of your recent edits where you added single letters to the name tags of some features in Madagascar. Specifically, I have noticed 7 different ways (closed and unclosed) that have been given the name “s”. Would you mind clarifying for me your data source or reasoning behind these names? I will include links below to a couple of the features for easy reference.Thank you in advance for looking into this, and happy mapping!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1315310862
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1314622688
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1313027822

Best Regards,
Isaac (VLD280)
nicyK19 (2024-09-18 07:43:39+00:00): Thank you for your comment. Its paths should not have names, this is a false manipulation of certain shortcuts on my part. I am in the process of resolving them to maintain the quality of the data.I will be very attentive next time . 
 Best Regards, 
nicyK19
VLD280 (2024-09-18 17:12:54+00:00): nicyK19,

Thank you for responding to my comment so quickly! I am glad to hear that you are able to resolve those name tags. Your contributions are definitely appreciated!

Happy mapping,
Isaac (VLD280)
Anas masuris (2025-01-17 22:41:42+00:00): Do obszarów area:highway nie dodaje się highway=footway (na tym samym obiekcie). To jest tagowanie pod render, do wycofania
Đuro Jiří (2024-09-15 22:45:34+00:00): Possiamo continuare, questa stazione di ricarica non ha nome. Inoltre Stazione di Ricarica e-Bike è nome descrittivo.
eggie (2024-09-13 12:35:59+00:00): Commentaar: Info samengevoegd met adresnode
Nzau (2025-02-24 20:48:11+00:00): Salut Normand14,
Juste pour info, je viens de retirer les tag bicycle=designated et foot=no. Ils ne sont pas nécessaire avec highway=cycleway

Merci pour l'ajout ! 
A+
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 08:12:47+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/824983448/history has tracktype = 4 that was added in this edit
Maybe it was supposed to be tracktype=grade4 ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Atracktype
literan (2024-09-14 11:41:37+00:00): вы маршруты переломали, зачем-то точки платформ перенесли на проезжие части.

напишите заметками или здесь в комментарии, что вы пытались сделать, а эту правку я откачу
ika-chan! (2024-10-07 00:38:30+00:00): Changeset 156570848 was reverted because it added disused slip roads as if they were in use, and the changeset comment was insufficient to explain such action.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157561209
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-02 23:53:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159862440, 159862427, 159862512, 159862481, 159862457, 159862433 where the changeset comment is: revert roblox_gmx edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16954
BCNorwich (2024-09-15 14:41:07+00:00): Duplicated highway removed.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-18 06:19:56+00:00): can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4715402 ?
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-02 23:53:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159862440, 159862427, 159862512, 159862481, 159862457, 159862433 where the changeset comment is: revert roblox_gmx edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16954
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-05 07:06:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367006769/history - what emergency=no is supposed to mean?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-05 07:06:49+00:00): that police and fire trucks are banned from going there?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-24 14:36:24+00:00): send PM https://www.openstreetmap.org/messages/1256665
ivrigthighjob (2025-05-24 14:38:42+00:00): Sorry for not responding... I assume the editor I used had that in the template, and I either set the wrong value or or was set to no by default. You can probably revert.
muralito (2024-09-14 20:11:23+00:00): Hola. Creo que no hay forma de que exista un supermercado en esta ubicacion. No hay suficiente superficie. ¿Que es lo que querias mapear?
n0plan (2024-09-14 21:31:30+00:00): hola, no lo termine de hacer bien. Queria poner a Jucy Lucy que es un "comercio" vegano.
muralito (2024-09-15 14:07:22+00:00): Bien. Lo que tenes que ver es si lo mapeas como shop o como amenity, por los comentarios parece amenity cafe o fastfood. Y es importante ponerle las etiquetas de vegano https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:diet:vegan para que aparezca en los mapas de cosas veganas.
uprkos (2024-09-13 15:00:06+00:00): Dlaczego oznaczyłeś całą tę drogę jako most?
ivrigthighjob (2024-09-13 20:18:52+00:00): a szit nie zauwazylem