piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
OpenStreetBoy (2025-07-15 09:06:16+00:00): Hi, betrifft die Straße "Lugenstein": das Tag vehicle=yes ist bereits vollkommen ausreichend um die Zugangsbeschränkung zu beschreiben, ein zusätzliches bicycle=yes + motor_vehicle=yes ist nicht notwendig. Ebenso ist foot=yes (Änderunssatz v15) nicht nötig, da ja bereits highway=pedestrian gesetzt ist.
Catastro_fico (2025-07-14 16:59:57+00:00): El horario cambia mucho, he puesto el horario de verano actual. Según la web el local tiene el número 26, sin embargo la puerta está donde he puesto el nodo.
NeisBot (2025-07-14 17:06:47+00:00): Hi mountainview2, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added and modified footways, crossings, and traffic islands, including updates to crossing markings and signals."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
jeslop (2025-07-21 15:24:21+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169250516
Leo Slager (2025-07-14 22:18:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2025-07-15 10:30:10+00:00): Your changeset is oké.
jeslop (2025-07-21 15:24:00+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169250501
Tommybara (2025-07-14 18:18:27+00:00): Creating a historical boundary, and then make a note "THIS IS NOT A HISTORICAL BOUNDARY". What kind of contribution is this?
Eren00 (2025-07-14 17:24:42+00:00): Maltepe'ye yaptığınız eklemeler için tebrik etmek isterim. Katkılarınızın devamı dileğiyle 👏🏻👏🏻
PardusPanteri (2025-07-15 11:48:06+00:00): Teşekkürler. Elimden geldiğince bir şeyler yapmaya çalışıyorum...
mcliquid (2025-07-15 06:46:08+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
StC (2025-07-22 20:57:26+00:00): It would also be good if the comments of changesets that span over multiple countries were formulated in a language that is understood by the majority. In any case, this changeset seems to have broken the continuity of a hiking route in France, I'll do my best to fix it.
tux67 (2025-07-30 07:29:30+00:00): Hi, ich sehe gerade du hast hier Poller "im freien Raum" eingetragen. Das sollte so nicht sein - Poller sollten IMMER Bestandteil (Node) eines Weges sein, da sie sonst keinen Einfluss auf das Routing haben.
Beipiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12999598282 - hier kann ein Navi immer noch ein Auto langschicken ..  
Hast du das noch an anderen Stellen gemacht und ... korrigierst du das selbst? 
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168928445
The Invisible Freak (2025-07-31 16:29:17+00:00): Oh, sorry. Das wusste ich nicht, macht aber natürlich Sinn. Ich wollte Dir nur die Arbeit der nachträglichen Änderungen ersparen.
Ich bin nicht mehr sicher ob ich noch mehr Einträge vorgenommen habe. Konkret kann ich mich noch an diese beiden Einträg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12999598282 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12999598281 erinnern.
Ich müsste die Logs noch mal durchsehen ob ich noch etwas übersehen habe.
Könntest Du mir den Gefallen tun und die beiden Punkt korrigieren? Danke schon mal vorab.
tux67 (2025-08-01 06:36:02+00:00): Bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12999598281 steht schon daneben ein Lift Gate auf dem Weg eingetragen .. wenn da wirklich noch ein zusätzlicher Poller ist kann der zwar neben dem Weg eingetragen werden .. macht aber routingtechnisch nix. War beides da?
tux67 (2025-08-01 06:56:14+00:00): Den anderen habe ich auf den Weg gelegt. Hier ist eine Abfrage aller Poller die du in unserer Gegend "angepackt" hast (also eingetragen oder nur verändert).
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2979
Schon mal eine Basis um die zu checken ...
tux67 (2025-08-01 08:42:48+00:00): Ich hab' die Abfrage mal erweitert um die Versionsnummer des Objekts. 
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/297C
Dabei sind mir noch 4 weitere (mit version=1 - also von dir erstmals angelegt" "ins Netz" gegangen, die ich mit dem jeweiligen Way verbunden habe. 
version=2 sind schon deutlich mehr - aber das sind - nach schnellem Quercheck nur welche, bei denen du Attribute ergänzt hast.
The Invisible Freak (2025-08-01 15:38:17+00:00): Uiiii, sorry. Hab's nur gut gemeint.
Bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12999598281 war tatsächlich rechts eine Schranke und links zusätzlich ein Poller, ja. Ich hatte auch ein Foto gemacht, das ist aber mittlerweile gelöscht.
Ach ja, stimmt. In Rheydt bzw. Rheindahlen hatte ich auch noch zwei Neueinträge vorgenommen.
Ich hatte mich schon länger gefragt, warum man die Poller nicht direkt in der StreetComplete-App eintragen kann. Macht aber vermutlich Sinn, ansonsten würden noch viel mehr falsche Einträge angelegt werden.
tux67 (2025-08-01 15:50:24+00:00): Das geht mit SCEE https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:SCEE
StC (2025-07-18 20:33:53+00:00): Hello,

not sure what you were attempting to do here, but you actually removed a way from the hiking route. Please discuss this (probably legitimate) routing issue on the forum before mapping for the renderer.
Flaburgan (2025-07-18 21:26:04+00:00): Hello, I don't know much more than what I reported in the github issue that I linked in my change comment: the fact that the full pier is considered a ferry route is causing a routing issue where a 15 min walk is deemed necessary to do 5 meters. I tried to fix the data but I never contributed to routing so don't hesitate to correct them if I did anything wrong.
NeisBot (2025-07-14 17:45:57+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 06:06:06+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/169090565
silversurfer83 (2025-07-14 20:32:05+00:00): Hi Tom :)

darf ich dir die aktuelle Dokumentation zu Ladestationen ans Herz legen? Ggf. kannst du diese dann noch einmal anpassen, da du sie mutmaßlich kennst.

Grüße
silversurfer83

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168929346
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-15 12:29:42+00:00): Hello! I see you added an artwork named after you. Could you explain what it is?
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-15 12:33:06+00:00): You added it to the pubic map. Everything will think that there is some artwork to see
giorgi papashvili (2025-07-15 14:06:05+00:00): there is my oil painting, garden, decorations.
eugkat (2025-07-15 17:07:53+00:00): Are they available for visitors? If so, I'd say it's art gallery
Leo Slager (2025-07-14 22:21:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2025-07-14 22:24:15+00:00): Hello,
Gezien het internationale karakter van OSM behoort het telefoonnummer in het internationale format vermeld te worden.
dus +31xxxxx en zonder de 0 van het netnummer.

Pas je het zelf aan ?
MassCartog (2025-07-14 19:08:51+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. The features you are removing in this and other changesets are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, On OSM, we do not removed features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public, or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing them is actually considered vandalism.

It's very clear that these features exist, and not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
Leo Slager (2025-07-15 10:54:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Nzau (2025-07-27 19:53:40+00:00): Bonjour David,

Pourrais-tu faire des changeset plus petits lorsque tu modifies des notes ?

D'ailleurs, tu as supprimé le tag bicycle=designated sur ce chemin : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244159077/history/13

Y a t-il une raison ? Il semble s'agir d'une voie verte, bicycle=designated est donc primordiale.

Au plaisir d'en discuter,
Enzo
APneunzehn74 (2025-07-14 19:14:37+00:00): Is horse=no here correctly?
DaveF (2025-07-16 14:55:31+00:00): Ah, that's changed a bit.
Given the bicycle road markings, separate pavements & cycle route relation, I think the Barton Hill Road section should be tagged as cycleway.
mstrbrid (2025-07-16 16:34:36+00:00): I thought the same a split-second after hitting 'upload'. I might dwell on it for a little while longer and bundle it with some inevitable future updates shortly.
APneunzehn74 (2025-07-14 19:13:31+00:00): Hey is the name by the parking correct?
Greetings
Too Tall Paul (2025-07-14 18:52:43+00:00): The edits are correct.  Would you like me to send you a survey?   Furthermore, Idaho state law specially states that city streets can only exist on platted city land.  How would you like to proceed?
MassCartog (2025-07-14 19:26:05+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. The features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

If the road ends at the city limit simply end the road at the city limit, but removing the land track and driveway features is incorrect.

You have a new account and might not be aware, On OSM, we do not removed features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public, or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing them is actually considered vandalism.

It's very clear that these features exist, and not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
MassCartog (2025-07-14 19:08:42+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. The features you are removing in this and other changesets are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, On OSM, we do not removed features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public, or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing them is actually considered vandalism.

It's very clear that these features exist, and not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
woodpeck (2025-07-15 07:56:00+00:00): Dear Chloé_Van_Steenkiste, "landover=trees" in an unusual tag, we would usually either map individual trees or call it "landuse=forest" (or "natural=wood" if unmanaged). Also, you did not set a changeset comment when uploading; it is considered good practice to write a few words about the change you are uploading. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Leo Slager (2025-07-15 11:00:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2025-07-14 23:06:19+00:00): Hi Pspier, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added office location with contact details and accessibility information."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #NoComment #AIgenerated
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-14 19:41:11+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400561464
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400561935
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1134776815
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1134776817
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1256944585

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
StC (2025-07-18 08:00:26+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'itinéraires pédestres qui passent par là. Je m'occuperais volontiers de la réparation... si votre commentaire était un peu plus utile : qu'avez-vous corrigé ? pourquoi ? à partir de quelles sources ?
lucassiste (2025-07-18 19:58:22+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai supprimé le morceau de chemin qui n'est plus accessible (protection de la flore d'après le panneau d'interdiction). Le GR qui y passait a été dévié.
StC (2025-08-07 11:38:37+00:00): Merci pour votre réponse. Deux questions alors :
 - est-ce que le chemin qui n'est plus accessible existe encore ? si oui, il doit rester dans OSM avec un tag access=no.
 - par où passe l'itinéraire désormais ? envisagez-vous de le rétablir dans OSM ?
Leo Slager (2025-07-15 11:03:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
NieWnen (2025-07-14 20:37:19+00:00): Dzięki za przywrócenie.
German C (2025-12-04 16:52:27+00:00): Hola Lolj, no se deben eliminar elementos y volverlos a crear el elemento eliminado https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/967665095 no se debió volver a crear https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1414716267 lo que se debe hacer es modificar el elemento existente mejorando la geometría. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=168934524 (En rojo esta resaltado lo que eliminaste)
Luzandro (2025-08-08 13:48:51+00:00): Hallo Dornbacher,

ich habe dieses CS rückgängig gemacht, hier hast du u.a. gleich die ganze Straße in einen Radweg verwandelt
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168934801
user_5359 (2025-07-15 08:04:46+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/3381854716. You move this node more than 100 meters. Please verif the right position.
AwFi (2025-07-27 14:51:59+00:00): Ciao👋,
ho visto che negli ultimi changeset hai aggiunto i numeri delle fermate nel campo name delle fermate, di solito si usa il tag "ref" che indica il riferimento della femata invece che aggiungere informazioni nel nome.
Buon mapping!

If you prefer messages in English let me know.
Szymson (2025-07-25 15:58:03+00:00): Fałsz - to nie jest disused tylko razed - tam fizycznie nie ma torów, przynajmniej nie w rejonie Abrahama, a tam dodałeś fikcyjny przejazd kolejowy na chodniku. Nie jest to zgodne z prawdą. Proszę to poprawić
NeisBot (2025-07-14 21:56:49+00:00): Hi ResulAteş, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added a new building with name DURDU NENE APT by creating nodes and a way."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
Marek-M (2025-07-15 12:39:49+00:00): Cześć, to chyba nie jest poprawka. Chyba relacje kolejowe nie powinny trafiać do linii torów kolejowych?
mstrbrid (2025-07-15 22:09:19+00:00): Hi, Atanas, I've gone ahead and reverted this changeset as it's quite evidently an error. There are no bus guideways here currently and the modal access tags were up to date. What were you trying to achieve with these changes?
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-07-15 20:30:13+00:00): Merhaba. Lütfen sitelerin sınırları için, building=yes değil landuse=residential etiketini kullanınız. Değişiklik açıklamalarınıza anlamsız harfler değil yaptığınız değişikliklerin özetini yazınız. 

Hatalı değişikliklerinizi ben düzelttim.

İyi günler.
4004 (2025-07-20 22:39:11+00:00): Witam, jaki source dla tej nazwy?
bxl-forever (2025-07-17 14:38:48+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for "adding details".

Here are two comments about your latest changes on OSM.

1. Do not add addresses to defibrillators, this creates unwanted data duplication within the database.  Defibrillators are devices, they are not buildings on their own.

2. You pushed 14 different changesets with an identical title: "Details aangevuld".  Your fellow mappers would be grateful to you if you could please start writing proper descriptions whenever you change something.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Have a nice day.
rubenhbk (2025-07-18 08:00:33+00:00): Thanks for the feedback!
I'll add better descriptions next time!

I don't agree on the address. Defibrillators are referred to (on website, FOD list, ...) with a name (often the building they are on/in) or the street & nr. Adding them to OSM makes referencing between lists possible and/or easier.
Re-use of the OSM-data in other websites, including the name and address, makes retrieval in case of emergency easier.
pavvv (2025-07-14 22:47:09+00:00): Please do not remove this tag. It's used on suburbs which don't have their exact area mapped and added to the boundary relation as subarea. Please restore the tag.
ivanbranco (2025-07-15 17:30:03+00:00): I thought it was this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2338689
pavvv (2025-07-15 17:39:25+00:00): Yes, it is and I added the tag for this very purpose. Funnily enough, last time I just added these nodes to the relation as admin_centre and somebody removed them from the relation so I just switched to a tag.
custodiankeyy (2025-07-16 23:37:37+00:00): Merhaba, binayı yanlış koymuşsunuz düzelttim

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1272877581
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169036556
SpinOff (2025-10-26 14:50:08+00:00): Z tego co pamiętam, na discordzie umówiliśmy się na niedodawanie boundary=religious_administration do lini wchodzących w skład relacji.
rohieb (2025-08-18 22:33:13+00:00): This was discussed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4822816 (and I'd love to see more source=* tags in changesets 😉)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source
Taya_S (2025-07-15 05:11:49+00:00): Reverted vandalism by user 'AdamLanzaTheDieselVideoEditor3450HD' DWG ticket #2025071510000055

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168944858
Taya_S (2025-07-15 05:11:04+00:00): Reverted vandalism by user 'AdamLanzaTheDieselVideoEditor3450HD' DWG ticket #2025071510000055

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168944840
Taya_S (2025-07-15 05:11:05+00:00): Reverted vandalism by user 'AdamLanzaTheDieselVideoEditor3450HD' DWG ticket #2025071510000055

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168944840
Taya_S (2025-07-15 05:11:06+00:00): Reverted vandalism by user 'AdamLanzaTheDieselVideoEditor3450HD' DWG ticket #2025071510000055

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168944840
citrula (2025-07-15 21:09:15+00:00): welcome to OSM. You marked the name of this road as "rd". Did you mean to do that?
aharvey (2025-07-15 02:45:38+00:00): this isn't quite right, you've added this to the whole wood area including the Lane Cove National Park https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3651359

Did you mean to add this no one of the relation inners instead? like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358798507 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/435725410 ?
aharvey (2025-07-17 06:03:45+00:00): I've reverted this change, but if you wanted to re-try on the correct way or address my comments so we can move forward.
Urban Green Place (2025-07-17 21:42:37+00:00): You're right to revert it, the wood feature is much bigger than the specific area I was trying to target (the area North of Sydney Adventist hospital, roughly -33.731483, 151.100399). I don't think it's represented by an existing inner relation however.
Urban Green Place (2025-07-17 22:02:34+00:00): The Ku-ring-gai Council maps portal (https://krgnsw.maps.arcgis.com/apps/instant/sidebar/index.html?appid=e145013ab4094d0da27f3387735b553b) has details of it at 185A Fox Valley Road. I'm not sure how to go about finding a license-compatible data source and capturing it though.
Britzz (2025-07-20 09:19:51+00:00): Merci de ne PAS supprimer
area=yes
highway=footway
lors de vos éditions
c'est documenté (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area) vous ne DEVEZ pas supprimer le travail des autres contributeurs. À votre disposition pour discuter via messagerie, si besoin.