piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
chriswhy (2024-12-18 05:53:02+00:00): Other changesets that were part of this project:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160329129
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160330755
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160331669
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160332162
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160332354
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160332779
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160333540
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
CurlingMan13 (2024-12-26 15:31:17+00:00): Don't add tennis courts as buildings
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160327993
eggie (2024-12-18 06:39:41+00:00): Dag Zilvervisje... Sinds wanneer zijn hier slagbomen?
Routeren zal het niet meer zonder access=yes.
Er waren wel altijd hoogte beperkende poortjes.
(height_restictor)
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-12-18 06:40:42+00:00): typo height_restrictor

Het zou natuurlijk zomaar kunnen want ze waren er wel bezig.
eggie (2024-12-18 06:46:05+00:00): Ik heb access=yes toegevoegd
Zonder die tag routeert het niet.
eggie (2024-12-18 06:36:58+00:00): Dag Zilvervisje.. Van die tunnel bij de nieuwe fietsenstalling heb ik een building_passage gemaakt.
Stukje buiten gebouw ontdaan van tunnel..  
Verder moped .. en mofa=no toegevoegd.
MVG
eggie
muralito (2024-12-18 20:10:20+00:00): Hola Roberto. Ya estaba mapeado el lavadero. Gracias!
esemenko (2024-12-22 15:00:15+00:00): The name of the track subdivison is incorrect. Metrolinx refers to this line as the "GO Subdivion" on official planning docs, not the Lakeshore East Subdivision.

This document from Metrolinx refers it that way multiple times 
https://assets.metrolinx.com/image/upload/v1663237565/Documents/Metrolinx/2020-04-29-Bowmanville-Rail-Service-Extension-PDBC-Final-v3-1.pdf
Page 46: "Trains to successfully incline from the GO Subdivision at Oshawa GO
station to climb and connect into the GM Spur"
CurlingMan13 (2024-12-26 07:36:46+00:00): Do not add tennis courts as buildings.  This is not just a whiteboard for your golfing game.  This is a real map we use.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
santamariense (2025-01-22 17:05:39+00:00): Olá Peaf,

Para aplicar informação a apenas um trecho de via, tu tem que cortar a geometria e aplicar as tags/rótulos/informações, sobre este trecho apenas .

Seleciona a linha a ser cortada, mantem shift pressionado e então seleciona o ponto na esquina que tu quer cortar. Feito isso, botão direito sobre o ponto te dá entre outras opções, a opção de corte (tesoura).

Bons mapeamentos!
santamariense
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:20:35+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659597
pesticides (2024-12-19 19:50:58+00:00): More information about the project: https://www.seattle.gov/transportation/projects-and-programs/programs/pedestrian-program/pinehurst-way-ne-and-ne-117th-st-intersection-and-sidewalk-project
Sanniu (2025-01-12 12:02:47+00:00): hi, the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1343260671 has no tags, can you add appropriate ones?
dpolovinkin (2025-05-07 11:53:13+00:00): hi, please press Q to square buildings geometry when you add them, otherwise it will be skewed like you did here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1343263499#map=19/36.649686/29.123926
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:10:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
DENelson83 (2024-12-18 01:43:00+00:00): My error; this is in Colwood
CurlingMan13 (2024-12-26 07:46:19+00:00): "Lollipopping" has been fixed.  Use multi-polygon relations.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160329662
CurlingMan13 (2024-12-26 07:31:54+00:00): Please don't lollipop ways.  If something has a "hole" in it, then a multipolygon relation should be used.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160330097
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:20:36+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659597
mavl (2025-05-13 15:09:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
fortera_au (2025-07-15 12:16:23+00:00): DWG revert - questionable edits - ticket #2025071510000279

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168962539
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:20:37+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659597
eerib (2024-12-19 19:14:26+00:00): I don't believe this is designated as a forest service road anymore. The government permit dataset shows this as a permit road under Hillcore Lakeside Pacific Forest Products Ltd with the road section id (name) of "T1".

It may be that the "Talc Creek Forest Service Road" name comes from the new backroadstatus.com website. That operator of that website often makes up names for roads or uses very out of date maps (Backroad Map books) in coming up with the names of roads.
sansell (2024-12-20 02:47:45+00:00): Yes, I've seen this name used by both backroadstatus.com & BRMB. 
A yellow signboard at a junction partway up had the names "North Talc Main" / "Old Spur" and looked relatively new in Sept/24, but there was no sign at the base of the road.

Agreed that it doesn't show up in the BC Gov't map, so feel free to remove the name if you feel it doesn't represent current usage.
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
ika-chan! (2024-12-18 08:20:57+00:00): The ways at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1343301527 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1343301526 appear to be in the wrong place. Please check the ways and either move or remove them where appropriate.
Mintusha98 (2024-12-18 09:02:23+00:00): Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have reverted the edit . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you.
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-20 04:05:43+00:00): Hello!

You used
horse=noc
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232310263/history

Have you maybe meant
horse=no
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
ion_chi (2025-02-20 06:45:11+00:00): This was a typo. You’re right it’s supposed to be horse=no. Thanks for catching it
highflyer74 (2024-12-18 06:38:38+00:00): Hello Joško! Please do not add POI data to buildings. Usually these are added as separate POI nodes as you can see in most places around Bremen. Also the source=* tag is not needed on objects anymore. This is usually added to the changeset. I have moved the POI accordingly. Have a nice day!
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
GunGoose22 (2024-12-18 04:48:56+00:00): quick rail tag edit*
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
emersonveenstra (2024-12-19 22:29:37+00:00): Hi there,

Did you mean to tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2136516792 as railway=switch? There's no crossing that i can see on the aerials
Bike 2 End (2024-12-20 03:08:53+00:00): Hi. Good catch. Sorry, when making numerous updates you sometimes fat finger one  workin on an iPad. Please correct the error.  Thx.

Cheers
emersonveenstra (2024-12-20 14:08:39+00:00): Fixed it, thanks for the quick response!
silversurfer83 (2024-12-18 20:13:59+00:00): gude :)

die smoothness und das surface bei den Parkplatzwegen in Lauterbach passen aber nicht so ganz zusammen, oder?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160333176
AndySchulte (2024-12-19 07:48:45+00:00): Moin, danke für den Hinweis.
Ich habe das angepasst.
ColbyTheWorldTraveler (2026-03-04 22:34:34+00:00): Is it possible to split the Terraces into their own multigons? The combination name is pretty jarring on the map.
EzyPup (2026-03-07 05:20:49+00:00): Hi crazycolbster, I think it is possible  to split the Terraces into their own multigons, though it would be a decent amount of work. I'm not sure what you mean by " The combination name is pretty jarring", I don't think I see what you mean.
ColbyTheWorldTraveler (2026-03-07 05:27:47+00:00): On the standard map view (Carto), by the Black Hills Terrace and Targhee Terrace, it just shows a big block of text saying “Teton Terrace;Sawtooth Terrace;Cascade Terrace;Clearwater Terrace;Wasatch Terrace”. I wish I could send a screenshot of what I’m talking about.
EzyPup (2026-03-07 05:43:12+00:00): I see what you are talking about now, ill see if I can fix that.
EzyPup (2026-03-07 05:53:33+00:00): It should be fixed now, or whenever openstreetmap updates to the latest changeset.
ColbyTheWorldTraveler (2026-03-09 13:00:52+00:00): Awesome! Thanks! The map is made better by people like you.
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-30 18:04:01+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11993237565/history has shop = direct_sales that was added in this edit
What is being sold here? Bananas? Cosmetics? Fermented cucumbers? Cars? Bus tickets? Bicycles? Vacations? Palm reading?
Supaplex (2025-12-01 06:20:32+00:00): smoothie or "health" breakfast
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-03 08:57:25+00:00): amenity=fast_food ?

or are they not selling it ready to eat
NM$L (2024-12-19 15:55:10+00:00): The changeset has been reverted for political vandalism. Please follow de-facto when mapping. Happy mapping~
dmjab13 (2024-12-18 05:52:05+00:00): wrong description: changed road types to parking/drive-thrus
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-18 09:53:05+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12429572437/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-20 02:05:59+00:00): This changeset incorrectly changed a rail to a road
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160334113
SekeRob (2024-12-18 10:21:12+00:00): Hi,

I think you broke https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12025990/ as now the forest renders white and some inner areas show as related to the wrong forest. Twice outline forest in same relations, same with several inner. Think this edit corrects this, at least now I can see the wood again https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160343413

ciao
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:20:38+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659597
Kovoschiz (2024-12-18 09:11:37+00:00): Please don't fix for renderers. The school is correctly described to be on structure, and inside the estate.
bxl-forever (2024-12-18 12:03:10+00:00): Hello,

Use "railway:track_ref" instead of "railway:ref" to indicate the track number.

We fixed all the changes to made on the railway infrastructure today (track numbers and removal of fake "names" of train platforms).
cyclist789 (2024-12-20 20:41:15+00:00): You made edits to Kolding, Nybøl and København in the same changeset...

I don't know what data you are dealing with, but it is generally best to keep changesets more compact, so they don't take up too much space on the history page.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/history
osmviborg (2024-12-20 21:29:48+00:00): Indenfor ét land er acceptabelt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
cyclist789 (2024-12-25 18:38:07+00:00): Jep, men ikke ideelt. Delt i tre changesets ville de f.eks. ikke besværre fynboerne.

Jeg er heller ikke særlig god til at holde dem kompakte, og visse datakilder er for besværlige til det.
Og vigtigere er det heller ikke. 🙂‍↕️

PS: God jul og godt nytår!🎄🎆
aTarom (2024-12-18 08:00:10+00:00): Hola, el tag
controlled_access=yes
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24306258/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4447809/history
es un error de subida de la importación? quedaría cubierto por el tag toll=yes?
Saludos
literan (2024-12-18 08:51:01+00:00): check_date еще нужно убирать (это дата последней проверки, не закончилась ли стройка). Ну и съезды запустить...
neo-plan (2024-12-18 09:23:01+00:00): Я не знаю по съездам. Пишут, что не все из них запущены...
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:06:18+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165094911
HolgerJeromin (2025-01-07 15:17:06+00:00): Woher weisst du dass das Gebäude 1164103084 ein Einfamilienhaus ist?
HolgerJeromin (2025-01-07 15:30:00+00:00): Und woher weisst du, dass der node 9794157656 kein Eingang ist?
Ich bin SEHR sicher, dass die Tür dort immer noch genauso ist. Sie gehört nämlich zu meinem Gartenschuppen...
wies1 (2025-01-07 15:50:45+00:00): Hallo, du sprichst vom Gebäude 
Katherine-Allfrey-Straße 20, Verl. Für mich sah es vom Luftbild her aus, wie ein EFH. Habe mal kurz auch in basemap reingeschaut jetzt, da ist das Gebäude jedenfalls als Wohnhaus angegeben. Da du wohl nicht von einem EFH ausgehst, werde ich es mal in residential umtaggen.,
Gruss
wies1
wies1 (2025-01-07 16:00:26+00:00): Hallo nochmal,
den Punkt 9794157656 kann ich nicht mehr finden. Die Suche im ID-Editor, wenn ich dort diese Nummer eingebe, bleibt erfolglos. Daher bitte ich Dich höflich die Korrektur selbst durchzuführen und die Tür wieder anzubringen. Entschuldigung fürs Herausnehmen. 
Gruss
wies1
HolgerJeromin (2025-01-07 16:10:19+00:00): > Da du wohl nicht von einem EFH ausgehst, werde ich es mal in residential umtaggen.,

Ich habe es vor ein paar Monaten als garage getaggt. Ich wohne daneben und was in der basemap steht ist mir egal.
HolgerJeromin (2025-01-07 16:12:16+00:00): Aber danke für die Ergänzung von ein paar Dächern hier in der Umgebung. Da war ich bisher zu faul zu.
Peter Brodersen (2024-12-18 07:57:39+00:00): (Løvspringet, not Løvbakken)
KKS (2025-03-02 00:25:40+00:00): І шо там точно МІНІ раундабаут? Чи знов їхати і дивитись шо ти там понапридумував?
pangoSE (2025-09-01 15:21:27+00:00): kanon!
eggie (2024-12-18 08:41:25+00:00): Dag Jeroen.. motor_vehicle=no heb ik weer verwijderd.
Die worden per default gestopt.
Het geeft anders problemen met mofa en moped.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-12-18 08:44:08+00:00): Dag Jeroen... Staat er bij die plaatjes een bord fietspad?
Ik kan niet zien wat je hebt aangepast.
MVG
eggie
JeroenBrouwer (2024-12-18 08:54:56+00:00): Nee, dat is het vreemde hier. Aan beide kanten staat een bord doodlopend (uitgezonderd fiets) en het stuk tussen de paaltjes is veel smaller gemaakt, alsof het een fietspad is. Echter, er staat geen formeel bord.

Maar zonder de juridische grondslag, moeten we dan dit niet als fietspad markeren? Op zich prima als de paal in OSM zorgt voor juiste routering voor voertuigen.
eggie (2024-12-18 09:23:29+00:00): Hoi... De paaltjes zorgen voor de juiste routering.
Wanneer het echt smal is zou je het als highway=path surface=?  kunnen taggen met evt moped= mofa= yes  (als die er door mogen.   Ligt aan het onderbord ) en foot=yes en bicycle=yes voor de duidelijkheid. 
Denk dat highway=path het beste lijkt. 
MVG
eggie
vasony (2024-12-22 22:06:33+00:00): Szia! 

Mi a Hét vezér utca módosítás forrása, ez szerepel a táblán?

Tamás
vasony (2025-01-07 20:20:36+00:00): A tábla alapján átírtam a nevet.
Dimacn (2024-12-18 13:39:59+00:00): Зачем вы удалили валидные теги с границы села? И зачем добавили landuse=residential на всю территорию включая сельхоз производство? Я отменю вашу правку.
Claudius Henrichs (2025-01-09 10:19:03+00:00): I removed the duplicate information from the polygon which was already present in the place=village node at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/303814147

Thanks for pointing out the duplication with the more granular landuse=residential already present. I've now removed the duplicate outer residential landuse: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161163523
Mazda05 (2025-02-08 19:52:26+00:00): Torgau2020, Bohoduchiv it's https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/27121092 & Bohoduchiv rajon it's https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11803996 + https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1737246 (1923 — 2020)
Yog Sot (2024-12-18 11:52:31+00:00): jeśli ścieżka przebiega przez jezdnie z ewidentną kontynuacją po drugiej stronie, to 'crossing' jest i jest 'unmarked' Więc skasowałeś wiele informacji z których korzystaja rozmaite softy
db-ak (2024-12-18 12:04:41+00:00): niektóre nie miały, a zwykły przedept definiowac jako przejście to nadużycie, zwłaszcza że nie spotkąlem nigdzie indziej takiego definiowania, np tu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/247995002
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/314582880
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5584788572
Tylko przy Perzyckiej i Owczej ktoś to stosował.  Żeby chociaż obniżony krawęznik tam był lub chodnik co mogło by sugerowac że jest to przejście sugerowane. A to jest nic, więc punkt.
eggie (2024-12-18 09:27:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Gebruikelijk is om een laadpaal als charging_station te taggen. Dat geeft een symbool. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
Ik heb het aangepast. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-12-18 09:31:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Hier is niet alles goed gegaan.
Je hebt adresnode Hoensbroekstraat 19 ergens anders heen gesleept. 
Die aparte parkeerplaatsjes die bij elkaar horen kun je beter samenvoegen tot één vlak.. Anders krijg je een kaart vol P's. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160340475
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-12-18 09:33:13+00:00): warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway
  	3
Wnneer wegen elkaar kruisen.. maak dan altijd een verbindingsnode.. Het routeert anders niet.
eggie (2024-12-18 09:38:57+00:00): Het adres heb ik hersteld. Bedenk dat apart getekende trottoirs zo niet routeren. Je zult dan voldoende verbindingen moeten maken.
Je krijgt enorme omwegen in de routering. Gebruikelijk is om die trottoirs op te nemen in de tagging van de hoofdrijbaan met sidewalk=right left of both.
Het mag wel zo, maar maak dan verbindingen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-12-18 09:42:01+00:00): Kijk voor langsliggende parkeerplaatsen even hier.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side
Brummelwuff (2024-12-18 12:21:57+00:00): Moin, du hast hier die Relatin https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12889530 gekappt
flohoff (2024-12-18 13:19:22+00:00): Moin,
danke für den Hinweis - Nicht nur die - es waren so 10-12 Stück denen da jeweils der 20m Schnipsel fehlte.

Hab ich korrigiert.


Flo
eggie (2024-12-18 10:14:40+00:00): Dag pimpie
Lijkt me oke.. 
Altijd lastig hump of table.
Hier de wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_calming

MVG
eggie