piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-12 17:08:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166163077 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17680 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-12 17:08:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166163077 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17680 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-12 17:08:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166163077 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17680 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-12 17:07:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166163077 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17680 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-12 17:08:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166163077 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17680 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-12 17:08:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166163077 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17680 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-12 17:08:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166163077 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17680 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-12 17:08:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166163077 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17680 and links from there
archie (2025-05-12 09:29:25+00:00): Jag har lagat mp nu.
Beau Jonckers (2025-05-12 11:32:59+00:00): Hey Map47. What did you change? What could I have done better directly? I would like to know for the other houses and places.
Map47 (2025-05-12 12:41:05+00:00): Hello Beau Jonckers,
You used a multipolygon to define the area of the private garden.
From the outer perimeter of the garden you have therefore excluded the area of the building.
From the rules of multipolygons the outer and inner areas cannot be matching.
In this case OSMI reports that part of the segments are duplicated.
So I modified the garden perimeter by excluding the building, thus eliminated the multipolygon because it is no longer needed.
See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
Beau Jonckers (2025-05-12 16:18:06+00:00): Hello Map47, Thanks for the reply. Your link is clear. If I understand correctly not a single edge should be inner and outer at the same time? What I did at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354322295   is than also not good because I should trace around the building. What I did at Anderhalbacherstrasse 24 is than better but that does not require a multipolygon. Right? I did not get any warning of OSM and I am not familiar with OSMI but I will change it around Feutersoey.
Map47 (2025-05-12 16:43:05+00:00): Hello Beau Jonckers,
You understood perfectly.
Here you have the OSMI response
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=7.27092&lat=46.41718&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.39&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Good mapping
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-05-12 10:02:41+00:00): Hi GPMapper,
Please do not copy data from Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a valid source for OSM.
Best wishes
Roger Wilco
rskedgell (2025-05-12 13:30:35+00:00): Could you explain what this nationalist rant has to do with your deleting the node for a removed KX200 phone booth on Baizdon Road, Blackheath, London, UK?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-12 17:08:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166163077 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17680 and links from there
Larmax (2025-05-28 19:23:50+00:00): Hei, palautin nämäkin muutokset. Miksi poistat jatkuvasti muitten tekemää työtä?
liljaadeliina (2025-08-13 06:51:29+00:00): Kiitos tiedosta ja että teit nuo muutokset karttaan. Muistaakseni puhut As Oy xxxxxx -muutoksista.

Koen, ettei niitä pitäisi merkitä asuinalueen nimeksi, vaan pikemmin operator tägiin rakennukselle/alueelle.
Larmax (2025-08-13 16:18:12+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:residential%3Dapartments Landuse=residential ei ole ihan  sama kuin asuinalue ja miksei nimeä voisi listätä name-tagiin, kun se on merkattu näissä tapauksissa kyltillä paikan päällä.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-12 09:31:03+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385743296

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-12 09:40:57+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385744394

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
jbramley (2025-05-14 19:14:46+00:00): Hi! This removed access:no from some tracks on the Wolf Way. I've been waiting to hear back from Suffolk council for a while now, but they're still listed as closed on the Suffolk TTRO page*. Have they re-opened on the ground?


* https://www.suffolk.gov.uk/roads-and-transport/public-rights-of-way-in-suffolk/traffic-regulation-orders/temporary-traffic-regulation-orders
Dan200 (2025-05-14 20:44:36+00:00): Heya,
I cycled Wolf Way from the War Memorial to Icklington as part of my ride, and from my observation it only seemed to be closed to Motor Vehicles (The large vehicle gate was padlocked shut, but the pedestrian/cyclist gate was perfectly usable. There were no signs either way, and I met a few walkers on my ride and didn't get any indication we weren't supposed to be there), therefore, I changed "motor_vehicle=designated" to "motor_vehicle=no". I removed the "access" tag as it was redundant, having been overridden for all vehicle types.
jbramley (2025-05-15 19:07:50+00:00): Oh, that's excellent, thanks! Perhaps I'll ride the Wolf Way this year after all.

I'll see if I can get the council to update their TTRO page (or at least confirm the intended status), then I'll update or remove the notes I added.
jbramley (2025-05-17 14:54:43+00:00): Huh. The council have confirmed that the routes should still be closed ("due to risk to public safety" according to the TTRO), but this seems very much at odds with your report, as well as those I've heard from others.

I've questioned this but I don't think I'll hear back until the end of the week. I won't edit anything further until they've clarified.
Dan200 (2025-05-17 22:07:58+00:00): That's interesting. Seems like a discrepancy between the "official" truth and the "on the ground" reality.

I was looking through my photos from the trip, and just by chance, one of my photos happens to capture the gate situation!

If you look at the far left of this image, you can see that the vehicle gate is padlocked, but the pedestrian/bike gate is accessible:
https://imgur.com/Q6eTHjt

If the council confirms that the PRoW is indeed suspended for walkers/cyclists, perhaps the compromise to capture the reality would be to change the foot/bicycle tags on the way from "designated" to "permissive"?
jbramley (2025-05-19 07:48:19+00:00): I suppose it depends on what they do next. The (helpful) person I was talking to a couple of months ago has left the role, and I'm not yet sure how the new people will treat it. Their e-mail signature says that they work Wednesday-Friday so it'll be at least a couple of days before I hear back.

If the council insist that the routes are closed and replace the signs, then "permissive" doesn't seem right. However, I don't think it's reasonable that the paths are closed in the first place (at least for cyclists and pedestrians). I've asked them to explain the "risk to public safety" because your account (and others) reveals nothing of the sort.

For the access side of things, I've been leaving notes on CycleScape: https://www.cyclescape.org/threads/6520
Dan200 (2025-05-19 13:40:37+00:00): Do we know who owns this land? If the way is (temporarily) no longer a legal PRoW, it's still "permissive" for a given mode of transport if the landowner still allows passage, which the gate and signage situation seems to suggest.

I do agree with you that it's pretty outrageous what the council have done here, it sets a terrible precedent for landowners to "temporaily" close PRoW's they don't like on spurious grounds.
jbramley (2025-05-19 19:14:52+00:00): The Land Registry thinks it belongs to the Elveden Estate, at least the part along Seven Tree Road.

I don't actually know what happens if it's under TTRO. I think misusing a RoW is considered a trespass, but breaking a TRO is probably something different.

I've sent a last-ditch request to SCC (and copied my message to CycleScape). I gave them your imgur link; I hope that's Ok!

My next step will probably be to involve the local MP, simply because I don't know what else to try.
Dan200 (2025-05-20 11:15:40+00:00): Yeah, that's absolutely fine. Good luck with the MP!
Dan200 (2025-05-20 15:31:40+00:00): BIG UPDATE.

I decided to just email the Elveden Estate office about this, and they confirmed that the closure is just for motor vehicles :) I've uploaded screenshots of the whole exchange below:

Part 1: https://i.imgur.com/YnbvbC4.jpeg
Part 2: https://i.imgur.com/qYWlIYd.jpeg
Part 3: https://i.imgur.com/EqZ9itd.jpeg
Part 4: https://i.imgur.com/hXFgGrj.jpeg

Hopefully you can still get the council to clarify the wording on their website, but as far as OSM is concerned I think this settles this issue :)
jbramley (2025-05-20 15:36:07+00:00): Oh that's fantastic, thanks! I'll pass these on to the council and encourage them to adopt that properly.
jbramley (2025-05-21 13:17:58+00:00): "Computer says no", say the council. Oh well.
Gleb_Artyomenko (2025-05-12 09:38:27+00:00): clarificationroad geometry was fixed based on Lyon Orthophoto 2022 (5cm) #mapbox_linters
eggie (2025-05-12 09:54:08+00:00): Hoi.. zeker weten dat Berka een officiële straatnaam is... anders beter verwijderen.

Beter dan het terrein taggen met name=Berka en toegesnede tagging.
Landuse=recration_ground? ..access=private

Mvg
eggie
Hendrik Maryns (2025-05-12 10:10:29+00:00): Nee, is geen straatnaam, is naam van het terrein.  Maar terrein is niet goed afgegrensd nog en ik heb hier nu geen tijd voor.
Hendrik Maryns (2025-05-12 10:11:09+00:00): Nr. 10 en dat kleine bosje erachter hoort er niet bij, de rest wel tot de punt die uitkomt op Anholt.  Daar is een hek en een pad dat ook nog ontbreekt.
eggie (2025-05-12 11:08:20+00:00): Ik heb het middenterrein met de naam Berka getagd en als recreation_ground getagd.
Je moet zelf maar even kijken of het klopt zo. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2025-05-12 11:12:34+00:00): CTRL f5 voor het effect
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-12 17:08:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166163077 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17680 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-12 17:08:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166163077 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17680 and links from there
Gregory Peony (2025-05-17 23:33:21+00:00): All building footprints here are valid, accurate and appropriately shaped. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166142849
nleanba (2025-05-14 09:32:58+00:00): It would be much appreciated if you could keep your changesets to a more reasonable area. this makes it hard to view recents edits in a given area, as such large edits will shop up for everyone look at the history of any part of central or southern Europe or turkiye.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-12 17:08:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166163077 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17680 and links from there
grzegorz75jan (2025-05-12 13:55:24+00:00): Tak się nie robi. Usunąłeś obiekt nie zachowując jego historii a w komentarzu gdzie pisałem o zduplikowaniu obiektu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165012350 napisałeś 

"Nie wiem o czym do mnie piszesz."

Rób tak dalej.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166143082
grzegorz75jan (2025-05-12 13:58:46+00:00): Wycofanie edycji z powodu usunięcia pierwotnego obiektu oraz niezachowania historii. Edytujący na upomnienie sarkastycznie wcześniej odpisał "Nie wiem o czym do mnie piszesz." https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165012350

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166154360
impact0r (2025-05-12 14:38:14+00:00): 1. "Rozumiem, że tego osm.org/way/1323717081#map=16/50.03026/21.02760&layers=N też nie masz zamiaru poprawić. "

Nie wiem, o czym do mnie piszesz.

2. Sprawdź sobie w słowniku znaczenie słowa "sarkastycznie".

3. Ostatni raz, kiedy próbowałeś pouczać, zacząłeś wandalizować kontrybucje innego użytkownika. Jedyny powód, dla którego nie zostałeś zaraportowany za wielokrotny wadalizm było to, że obiecałeś odwrócić swoje zmiany. 

Nie kontynuowałem komunikacji z Tobą, bo sposób w jaki budowałeś swoje odpowiedz fałszując narrację świata rzeczywistego na taką, jak odbierasz go wewnętrznie (ewidentnie po przejściu przez jakieś zniekształcające warstwy zaburzeń), wskazywał na potencjalne narcystyczno-aspołeczne zaburzenie osobowości, z którym nie chcę mieć do czynienia.
A wg tego, co sam wcześniej pisałeś o interakcjach z innymi użytkownikami OSM, najpewniej nie jestem pierwszą osobą, która podziękowała za dalse interakcje z Tobą.

4. Nie generuj rozdźwięku z tym, co o sobie piszesz w profilu ("Nie znam się na mapowaniu") i przestań pouczać i grozić innym, a skup się na pozytywnych kontrybucjach do projektu.
user_22937564 (2025-06-03 20:22:43+00:00): XD
grzegorz75jan (2025-06-04 21:46:48+00:00): Torunianin to masz XD
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18316
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18315

Załóż więcej kont a dostaniesz 100 lat.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-12 17:08:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166163077 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17680 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-12 17:08:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166163077 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17680 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-12 17:08:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166163077 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17680 and links from there
eggie (2025-05-12 10:52:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Kort door de bocht. Een wandelpad heeft meestal een G7 bord .. dus highway=footway   Dat zal dus niet routeren voor fietsers in OSM.
bicycle=no is dus niet nodig.
Wanneer er geen bebording staat dan highway=path gebruiken.   Dat is bicycle=no en foot=yes wel evt nodig.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
jeslop (2025-05-12 12:45:22+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166150894
eggie (2025-05-12 10:54:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Tip....  Niet name=... gebruiken als je iets wil beschrijven.
Het symbool en de tagging zal het doen.
Ik haal de name=Drinkwaterpunt weer even weg, 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-05-12 10:57:57+00:00): Ik heb het watertappunt weer verwijderd. Het staat al gemapt bij de VVV.
Er zullen er geen twee naast elkaar zijn. 
MVG
eggie
Flurgx2000 (2025-05-12 11:46:24+00:00): Oké, zoals je zegt, nadat ik in mijn navigatie-app naar drinkwater zocht, vond ik maar één punt in heel Freiland en toen kwam ik dit drinkwater tegen op mijn tocht. Ik kwam het toevallig tegen, dus ik dacht dat het nuttig zou zijn om het aan OSM toe te voegen
eggie (2025-05-12 12:09:27+00:00): Het was zeker nuttig.

Het reeds aanwezige drinkwaterpunt was alleen als water_tap getagd. Ik heb daar amenity=drinking_water aan toe gevoegd. Nu zal het straks wel vindbaar zijn en een symbool geven. 
CTRL-F5 voor het effect.
Ga zeker door met 
de kaart aan te vullen.
MVG,
eggie
Flurgx2000 (2025-05-12 14:30:58+00:00): Oh, ik begrijp het, ja dan heel erg bedankt
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-12 21:08:17+00:00): Hello Helen! It looks like you've been quite busy. Thank you for the many contributions :)

It seems you moved a bus stop whose name is "גאולים\שדרות ירושלים" to a street named "ההסתדרות". 

Is this a mapping mistake or intentional?

For the record:

It was originally here (red top left), https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166143273

Then it was moved (green bottom left in the same link),

And then it was moved again as can be seen here (bottom yellow) https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166143875

Also, please note that it's better to simply move the node rather than delete it and recreate it, as you've done the second time you moved it. This kind of removal destroys the node history. I will restore that history after you let me know whether this is an error or not.

Thank you!
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-12 21:14:46+00:00): For the record, the original deleted node is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1803003320 , and its identical replacement, albeit in a different location, is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12830016792
HelenDoesMaps (2025-05-13 05:31:49+00:00): Oh,
When I was editing this part I accidentally moved the bus stop onto a building, and only noticed it after I finished. I just wanted to  get done with it, so I didn't even notice that the bus stop wasn't from there, which is very sloppy of me. I'll fix it when I come home today (If I have time today, which I might not.)
And thank you so much for pointing this out, I wouldn't have noticed myself.
I'll try to be more educated about rules and less dumb in general next time.
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-13 07:05:25+00:00): Don't worry about making mistakes! We all do, and that's how we learn.

Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166186057

I've done it myself because restoring the deleted stop's history is a bit tricky.
Truchin (2025-05-14 12:22:38+00:00): Bonjour Foehn,
J'ai vu que tu as passé le port Rhu en vasière (weltland=tidalflat). D'après le wiki, cela correspond à "une zone inondée par les marées, constituée de boue nue ou de sédiments similaires, où l'on trouve de nombreux oiseaux, crabes et mollusques." https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:wetland=tidalflat
Or la majorité du bassin est inondée en permanence quelque soit la marée. Il faudrait restreindre aux zones découvertes à marée basse (du côté de Pouldavid principalement) et repasser le reste du bassin en natural=water.

Bonne continuation

Thomas
foehn (2025-05-14 13:23:24+00:00): Bonjour Thomas,
Merci pour ta vigilance, c'est très juste. Dans mon idée, c'était de qualifier le fond, sous l'eau. De façon générale, j’essaie de montrer la diversité de l'estran. Mais tu as raison, cette partie du port ne sera jamais découverte. Je corrige cela bientôt. Je me le mets dans la liste des trucs à corriger pour les jours prochains.
Vas-tu au SOTM ? ça serait l'occasion de faire une team DZ ?
Bon après-midi,
Truchin (2025-05-19 07:23:03+00:00): Top pour la correction. C'est effectivement une info intéressante de savoir ce qu'il y a au fond de l'eau.
J'irai peut-être un jour au SOTM, mais ce n'est pas encore prévu cette année, quoique j'aurais eu un bon sujet à approfondir dans le cadre du boulot.

Au plaisir !
woodpeck_repair (2025-05-12 10:14:38+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 166134934, 166141361, 166143294.
Alexis Giraud-Courtney (2025-05-13 10:56:16+00:00): Please do not revert this change I will fix the wikivoyage tag and delete it
mueschel (2025-05-15 10:55:46+00:00): Hi,
please check this node, it got a strange tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12830021694#map=19/51.267525/-0.282896
habi (2025-05-12 10:22:37+00:00): Im Post im Community-Forum, der als `source` verlinkt ist, habe ich die Änderung angesprochen, nach ein paar Tagen wurden keine Bedenken geäussert.
jeslop (2025-05-12 12:45:23+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166150894
jeslop (2025-05-16 07:10:44+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166334893
mavl (2025-05-12 15:01:01+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок меняет тег  
office=company  
на тег  
office=маркетинговое_агентство  
  
Значение тега office должно быть словом на английском языке.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:office
jeslop (2025-05-12 12:45:24+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166150894
jeslop (2025-05-16 07:10:21+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166334882
jeslop (2025-05-12 12:45:25+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166150894
habi (2025-05-19 09:11:16+00:00): Ciao tmeller
Ich kommentiere hier wegen `review_requested=yes`.
Ich verstehe nicht ganz, was hier kaputt war, und was du geflickt hast.

Ich sehe 'nur', dass du https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19120996/ erstellt hast.
Ist das, damit die Lichtung https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1381980074/ auftaucht?
Ich würde diese nicht als 'agricultural' landuse bezeichnen, anhand der swisstopo Orthofotos sieht das einfach nach Gras aus.

E liebe Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi
tmeller (2025-06-30 15:45:18+00:00): Hallo habi,
danke fuer das Review. Ja, das ist fuer die Lichtung gemacht, und ich war vor Ort und das Feld ist definitiv da und wird fuer die Imkerei genutzt.
Flaechenrelations mit Ausbruechen sind ein Alptraum. Danke fuer die Korrektur der Insel. Leider ist das Wiki nicht auf dem aktuellen Stand.
Bisher hiess es immer 'don't map for the renderer'
eggie (2025-05-12 12:45:43+00:00): Hoi,
Ik heb de rotonde ingelegd mbv de BGT. Is de Achterschaykstraat werkelijk afgesloten voor auto's en motoren?
Op de satfoto zie ik een parallelfietspad? langs de Spitsbergerweg. Die heb ik nu als fietspad ingevoerd.
Graag reactie..
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-12 12:59:23+00:00): Voorlopig toch even een highway=path van gemaakt.