piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
scai (2023-06-14 07:23:00+00:00): Hi Tatrafan_2050,
für Straßen, die gerade gebaut werden, wird nicht construction=yes verwendet.
Stattdessen wird highway=* in highway=construction geändert und construction=<highway-wert> gesetzt.
Also beispielsweise wird highway=residential zu highway=construction + construction=residential.
Ich habe das mal entsprechend korrigiert.
Frans S (2023-06-13 15:27:09+00:00): Hello. See my comment of another changeset.
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137291243
Frans S (2023-06-13 15:28:19+00:00): hi again.
The recommended imagery is Maxar Premium.
Please switch to that !
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137291243
adiatmad (2023-06-15 04:25:45+00:00): Halo, apakah ini taman atau bangunan? karena ada nama "home" tapi ditandai sebagai taman (leisure=park)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137291369
Taya_S (2023-06-13 16:51:39+00:00): Hallo Licha,

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Ik heb de ford=stepping_stones tags verwijderd. Deze tag word gebruikt om stenen waarmee je door water heen kan aan te geven. Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:ford=stepping%20stones?uselang=en

Ik weet niet of deze allemaal openbaar toegankelijk zijn, zo niet zou je nog access=private kunnen toevoegen. 
Verder ziet het er goed uit. 

Groeten,
Taya
lipuma (2023-06-14 13:44:18+00:00): Hi, did you mean `payment:bank_transfer=yes' instead of `paymeant:ban=yes'?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-13 15:51:40+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445163871
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1181795042

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Jordi MF (2023-06-13 17:34:39+00:00): Hola ramonz,
Per favor, intenta ser més precís quan afegisques noves sendes i pistes. Les vies han de seguir les corbes que realitza la senda o la pista i no fer-ho com a línia recta. Costa molt corregir-ho, mostra una informació no real, els enrutadors calculen a distància molt menor de la real i, en cas que algú seguisca un GPS ciclista, pot ser perillós perquè no mostrarà la traçada real i el ciclista  no podrà calcular bé la següent corba.
Salutacions,
Jordi
adiatmad (2023-06-14 09:13:35+00:00): Dear Sir,

Firstly, I would like to commend you on your excellent edits! I wanted to take a moment to provide you with a friendly heads-up regarding a certain matter. It is advisable to avoid using generic names such as "name=House" (as seen in this example: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1181798266). To gain further insight into this topic, I recommend referring to this page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions.

Thank you for your dedication to mapping, and please keep up the outstanding work!

Best regards,
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137292661
blendergeek (2023-06-14 00:53:56+00:00): Please "save your changes" after each item in MapRoulette. Otherwise, each changeset is spread across the country and reviewing the changes is much harder.

Thanks for helping with OpenStreetMap!
julcnx (2023-06-14 02:14:44+00:00): Hallo!
Ich habe deinen kürzlichen Changeset bemerkt, das den generischen Namen "Ergänzung" trägt und sich über mehrere Länder erstreckt. Es ist großartig, dass du zu OpenStreetMap beiträgst!

Nur eine freundliche Empfehlung: Wenn du Änderungen vornimmst, die mehrere Länder betreffen, ist es oft ratsam, sie in kleinere, fokussierte Changesets aufzuteilen, die sich auf geografische Regionen beziehen. Dadurch wird die Überprüfung und Verwaltung der Bearbeitungen erleichtert.

Außerdem ist es vorteilhaft, einen aussagekräftigeren Kommentar zu deinen Changesets hinzuzufügen. Durch das Hinzufügen von Details zu den spezifischen Ergänzungen oder Verbesserungen, die du vorgenommen hast, können andere Mapper den Zweck und den Kontext deiner Bearbeitungen besser verstehen (z. B. "fehlende Straße hinzugefügt"). Dies fördert eine bessere Zusammenarbeit und verbessert die Gesamtqualität der Karte.

Wenn du Fragen hast oder Hilfe benötigst, stehe ich gerne zur Verfügung. Frohes Mappen!
literan (2023-06-13 18:30:23+00:00): это НЕ тег велосипедной дорожки.

объясните словами, что вы пытаетесь замапить? правку отменю
ConnorMaps (2023-06-13 16:21:36+00:00): Way added is a track way
RicoElectrico (2023-06-14 00:10:52+00:00): Dziwne, w  TERYT nie ma tej nazwy.
kukułka (2023-06-14 19:03:10+00:00): Tak. Tak jak nie było nazw ulic sąsiadujących wymienionych tu: https://strefa.gda.pl/aktualnosci/1408-na-terenach-dawnej-stoczni-gdynia-bezpieczniej-dzieki-pomorskiej-sse?PHPSESSID=3c125d84d7f3c4ef15b1f7ac8a5da564. Te ulice, jak i ul. Przelotowa i gołębia są na terenie prywatnym. Właściciel dążył i dąży do tego by stały się drogami publicznymi w zarządzie ZDiZ. Nie mniej nazwy są używane jak np. tu: https://www.zdiz.gdynia.pl/zmiany-w-organizacji-ruchu-w-zwiazku-z-zawodami-enea-ironman-70-3-gdynia-2019/
CometSeeker (2023-06-13 18:58:07+00:00): Добрый день! Дорожка https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123742961 уже имеет данные о наличии велополосы. Пожалуйста, ознакомьтесь с правилами мапинга велодорожек, в частности обратите внимание на раздел примеров. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dcycleway
Tom Telman (2023-07-29 18:59:53+00:00): Гемморой с этими велодорожками. Они мне не нужны. Наводите сами
squirrel15841089 (2023-06-13 21:36:14+00:00): Hello. There's no service between Brugsepoort and UZ since Sept 2022 and expected till June 2024. There is a 'pendeltram 4' between Gent-Sint-Pieters and UZ. Would it be worth it to remove the part of the route between Brugsepoort and GSP from the relation?
See https://www.delijn.be/nl/nieuws/gent-werken-coupure-rechts/
Thanks
multimob (2023-06-13 22:30:21+00:00): For UZ, this is an interesting suggestion, I’ll try to see what I can do.

Next time, please message me directly, do _not_ comment on random changesets, because it will mislead people into thinking that the changeset has a problem.
map per (2023-06-13 20:00:49+00:00): Hallo LisiM,

wegen "Meine Änderungen überprüfen":

Die Teile der Änderung die ich mir angeschaut habe sehen gut aus. Versuche aber bitte deine Changesets räumlich lokal zu halten (1). Speichere also bitte deine Änderungen und fange einen neuen Changeset an bevor du zu einer anderen Region wechselst.
Bei so großen Changesets wie diesem hier (2) ist ein Review mit standard analyse Software nicht mehr möglich.

Danke und viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
(2) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137295035
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 06:13:59+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10974298054/history has shop = boutique that was added in this edit
shop=boutique? Is it shop selling clothes? Then maybe shop=clothes would fit well, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=clothes

Or maybe shop=fashion_accessories ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=fashion_accessories ) would fit better? Or shop=bag ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=bag ) ?

Or is it some completely different type of shop, with tag used as "boutique" is French word for shop? In such case see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for some documented values.

For shop=boutique info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=boutique page
impiaaa (2023-06-14 01:35:22+00:00): It's still useful to know, for example, whether unit E is towards the north end of the building or the south. There's no such thing as too much detail on OSM! These PoI were added through an import project we've been running, if you like you can try to contribute there as well! https://maproulette.org/browse/projects/42122
Black_Diamond (2023-06-14 04:37:44+00:00): Thanks. I’ll keep that in mind for the future. This building is a small 2 story building, and the labels would definitely overlay each other if put to the most precise location. In some of the other business locations that I fixed, some of the original locations seemed to be placed in a way due to the desire to show the label from a distance and not crowded out on the screen. I tried to get those close to the right location without crowding out the other businesses.
impiaaa (2023-06-14 05:00:05+00:00): In OSM, accuracy to the real world should always be prioritized over readability of the map. Mapping style over accuracy is called "mapping for the renderer," and there's more explanation here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer . OSM is a spatial database that can be used by lots of different software, so making it look good in one might break another. So as a standard, we make the map as accurate as possible to reality, and let the software figure out how to do things like place labels.
impiaaa (2023-06-14 18:02:31+00:00): Also, you can use level=* to indicate what story of the building something is on: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level
Joseph R P (2023-06-13 21:37:26+00:00): Hello, I'm not too sure about having the trunk route follow Loudoun County Parkway all the way north to One Loudoun. VA 28 already serves the purpose of being the primary north-south connector between Dulles and VA 7 and makes LCP act as more of an arterial or business route (though it was built after VA 28). The pre-existing trunk route served a better purpose of connecting South Riding towards Sterling, Herndon, and Reston (and I am almost inclined to extend it further east to VA 7 to act as a DTR bypass and link Tysons), but I'm also not even sure if that should be a trunk route or should be reverted to primary despite me being the one who upgraded. All that I am sure if is that LCP isn't as important as Fairfax County and Prince William Parkways, which serve as major trans-regional routes and link between cities like Woodbridge to Fairfax to Reston and Woodbridge to Manassas to Gainesville respectively.
WC392309 (2023-06-14 00:09:35+00:00): I definitely get your point, I think the trunk route should only lead to Waxpool Road and then downgrade to secondary at VA 28. But I would put LCP over Old Ox Road in importance, but isn't as important as FCP or PWP.
WC392309 (2023-06-14 00:16:42+00:00): I think LCP should be trunk though. It is the most important secondary state route in  Loudoun County, even though there are roads like VA 7(part motorway), VA 28 and 267(both motorways), and US 50(John Mosby Highway) but LCP has more importance than roads like SR 621(evergreen mills), SR 659(belmont ridge), and even SR 606(Old Ox) even though that one might be controversial. LCP doesn't isn't close to being as parallel as US 29(Lee Highway) with I-66 for VA 28, but I do get your point. Still think this should be trunk even though it isn't as important as FCP or PWP
Joseph R P (2023-06-14 02:39:55+00:00): Most secondary routes in Virginia aren't important enough to be trunk, as the ones that were in the past were added to the primary state route system. I don't actually think there are any secondary routes tagged as trunk besides from LCP currently.

LCP doesn't really have much along it, other than some SFH subdivisions and office/industrial parks, whereas FCP and PWP link town/city centers. LCP also doesn't really outstand from the other divided arterial roads like it in the eastern Loudoun area. It isn't high-speed like FCP or PWP are for most of their routes, and doesn't serve as an intercity/transregional connector like the other two parkways do. 

Traffic along LCP will mostly be local traffic whereas a trunk route like VA 28 or US 15 will be carrying traffic that could be travelling between Manassas and Frederick. Though it was not built to be one, it functions like a business route of VA 28 like US 1 is along I 95, US 29 is along I 66, or VA 236 is along I 495, despite it veering away from it near the DTR.

The most important local roads should always be primary. The trunk network is for non-freeway highways that serve a similar purpose to what an Interstate does, and for that reason, I really don't think that there should be any trunk routes within the box of VA 7, US 15, US 50, and VA 28, at least for the time being if something like the Bi-County Parkway is built.
WC392309 (2023-06-14 13:59:34+00:00): I would say to only extend the trunk part to VA 267 from US 50 on LCP but revert the part north of VA 267 to primary
Joseph R P (2023-06-14 15:37:50+00:00): The Dulles Greenway is a toll road so it isn't necessarily part of the trunk network, and there also isn't really anything of significance at the junction of LCP and the Greenway. Old Ox Road at the least connects towards IAD, Sterling Herndon, and Reston, but I think that the whole thing, including my changes, should be reverted wholly to primary. I feel like someday, if there is a more direct highway extension between Gainesville and South Riding as has been proposed for a while now, I could see the reason for a trunk route within this vicinity, but for now it would be best for these roads to remain primary since they don't serve much of the purpose that they were intended to yet.
DressyPear4 (2023-06-14 19:20:07+00:00): Por que as torres de energia foram deletadas?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137295745
Patr1k_P (2023-06-14 15:23:08+00:00): nazdar, nepozeral som to nejak detailne, ale len namatkou tieto 2 budovy s adresou

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240906833
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240906000

...sice podla mozaiky budova neexistuje, ale adresy pravdepodobne stale existuju https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/kataster/detail/kataster/parcela-c/820610/197_2?pos=49.045294,19.823293,19
len by to chcelo presunut na aktualne budovy

...v takychto pripadoch by som odstranil tuto budovu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240906368 a na jej miesto posunul budovu s adresou aby zostala adresa zachovana...takze nez vymazes budovu ktora ma adresu, nezaskodilo by preverit podla katastra ci adresa existuje a samozrejme nie vzdy to moze byt 100% pravda kedze aj v katastri su chyby a niekedy nie su aktualizovane informacie
Patr1k_P (2023-06-14 15:25:04+00:00): keby si adresu len prekopiroval, tak povodny autor adries bude zmazany, co by bola podla mna skoda, ale tak to uz je asi detail
Filip009 (2023-06-14 15:37:34+00:00): Bolo tam strašne veľa už neexistujucich budov, tak som adresy veľmi neriešil (čo sa zdalo, že by mohlo byť na vedľajšej budove, tak som dal replace geometry), len som mazal budovy a keď bola nejaká nová väčšia, tak som ju pridal, niektoré som zlúčil. Keď by som overoval každú budovu, ktorú som vymazal, tak by mi to trvalo dvojnásobne dlho. Ale uznávam, že by som mal citlivejšie narábať s adresami. Je nejaká vrstva do JOSM-u, kde by som videl adresy a zároveň aj Ortofotomozaiku? Aby som tieto budovy s adresou nemazal, ale len dával replace geometry.
Patr1k_P (2023-06-14 16:58:15+00:00): no ja len ze spocitas na jednej ruke pocet ludi co sa venujeme na celom SR adresam, tak je skoda na to nedavat trochu vacsi pozor...inak tie konkretne priklady co som uviedol, tak ked si vsimnes je to aj na jednej parcele, aj bez pouzitia katastralnej vrstvy ze to je v jednom akoby pasme (stara budova s adresou vs existujuca budova na mozaike)

..mame len toto wms:https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/zbgis/rest/services/RA_Adresne_body/MapServer/export?bbox={bbox}&bboxSR=102100&imageSR=102100&size=512%2C512&dpi=96&format=png32&transparent=true&layers=show%3A0&f=image ale to moc nepomoze, najistejsie je navsteva katastra...cez utilsplugin si nakonfigurujes priamo katastralnu stranku a ked si pri nejakej budove tak pouzijes klavesovu skratku a hodi ta to priamo na katastralnu stranku na dane miesto
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-13 17:20:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1181816711

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
DressyPear4 (2023-06-14 19:27:21+00:00): Por que definir como túnel se a via superior está definida como viaduto?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137296192
Frans S (2023-06-15 08:38:51+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings do not meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. ( see attached document for more info)
1. Use the maxar Premium Imagery please. See instructions. You caused an offset.
A: Not accurately drawn.
E. Buildings not squared.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137296924
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-13 17:50:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9516328656

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
demonq (2023-06-13 21:49:09+00:00): Dziękuję za poradę.
Poprawiłem tagi.
Frans S (2023-06-14 08:31:03+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137297201
bxl-forever (2023-06-13 21:32:06+00:00): Hello,

It looks like you did not just "add info about the campus"… but changed the main name.  And I don’t believe this i correct here.

ULB has several campuses.  The usual tagging convention would be to name them like this "Université libre de Bruxelles – Campus du Solbosch". (We did this for VUB, Odisee and others; note the "en dash" separator in the middle.)

It might be a good idea to review the other campuses and apply a standard convention for them.  If you feel like doing it, fine, otherwise I’ll put it to my list of things to do.

Cheers.
JhowieNitnek (2023-06-14 04:22:25+00:00): Hi, I applied the convention of campus=name campus, and the mane name is the name of the university 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:campus
bxl-forever (2023-06-14 10:47:53+00:00): The "convention" is just a single wiki page created about 3 months ago where most of the text comes from a single contributor.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:campus&action=history

Naming convention for university sites spread over several places is worth discussing within the community.
JhowieNitnek (2023-06-14 16:20:36+00:00): Okay, how do you think we should do it then
bxl-forever (2023-06-15 23:07:56+00:00): After writing my comment, I asked the question on the OpenStreetMap Belgium Matrix Chat.  There have been a few replies so far.
jodd (2023-06-19 18:34:11+00:00): Hallo,
wenn das nur ein Trampelpfad ist und kein offiziell unterhaltener Weg: Was hältst du davon, informal=yes zu ergänzen? Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:informal
VG Jo
anom_2 (2023-06-19 18:52:23+00:00): Steht beim Trampelpfad drin. Hatte ich schon von Anfang an drin.
anom_2 (2023-06-19 18:53:17+00:00): Ja, beim Trampelpfad (1181827136, v1) ist informal=yes !
jodd (2023-06-19 18:57:29+00:00): Asche auf mein Haupt. Keine Ahnung warum, ich das informal=yes vorhin übersehen habe. Danke trotzdem für die schnelle Rückmeldung :-)
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-13 18:30:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268783747

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Langlaeufer (2023-06-13 19:22:08+00:00): Hi Nick,
war das mit highway=footway und bicycle=designated Absicht?
Halte ich für keine Gute Idee gemeinsame Rad- Gehwege als Fußweg zu erfassen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137298224
gscscnd (2023-06-13 19:54:27+00:00): Przenosisz obrysy budynków tam gdzie na zdjęciach widać ich dachy. To nie jest prawidłowy sposób rysowania: obrys powinien się pokrywać z powierzchnią zajętą przez budynek na poziomie gruntu.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling
Kasujesz budynki z danymi adresowymi, rysujesz nowe bez tych danych.
ibanez (2023-06-13 20:01:04+00:00): Bitte beschreibe deine Änderungssatzkommentare umfassender, wenn du wie hier die Einrichtung umbenennst, dann schreibe z.B. "Name der Einrichtung hat sich geändert", dann müssen deine Mitmapper sich nicht alle Details ansehen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Gute_%C3%84nderungssatz-Kommentare%E2%86%99
habi (2024-04-02 20:53:12+00:00): Ciao tcarlisle
I'm looking at https://opencampingmap.org/ because I'll travel here in summer.

You've tagged a lot of `tourism=camp_site` inside of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15973307
I think that all the individual sites should be tagged as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_pitch, so that OpenCampingMap does not show them all as individual camp *sites*, but as *pitches* inside a large site.

Happy mapping,
habi
tcarlisle (2024-04-02 21:15:22+00:00): Yes, tourism=camp_site is very intentional since tourism=camp_pitch does not get rendered on the map by OSM, nor many other mapping systems.  So if you want to show the sites/aka pitches on them map unfortunately to "correct" tag, tourism=camp_pitch, is not effective.
habi (2024-04-02 21:19:55+00:00): We do not tag for the renderer, especially not for the standard view (OSM Carto), see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

I've changed the individual pitches, they now show up nicely on OpenCampingMap, see here: https://opencampingmap.org/en/relation/15973307#18/36.10122/-112.09656/0/1/e6f