piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Russ McD (2025-01-09 22:39:09+00:00): Paul - I don't think this single highway section of the 1072 is one way. Perhaps an error ?
Can you take a look and correct if appropriate. Cheers, Russ.
PaulHaag (2025-01-30 14:35:57+00:00): Russ
Thanks for the remark. I fixed it.
Kind regards
Paul
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:08:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
willkmis (2025-01-09 13:52:20+00:00): Hi, can you clarify what source you're using for this information? In an uncertain environment, I think the last thing we want to do as OSM is to communicate that houses have been destroyed without firm evidence. I also don't think that name=Wildfire damage is exactly right, maybe destroyed:by= or something?
b-jazz (2025-01-09 20:21:55+00:00): As someone that went through the days long trauma of having my house incorrectly shown on government maps as being destroyed in a wildfire, I agree that extra care needs to be given to reporting accurately.
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:08:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Tadeo_Gonzalez (2025-01-10 00:21:37+00:00): Por qué sería terciario? No debería ser una vía primaria? o al menos vía secundaria. Dejando de lado la infraestructura en la cual se está construyendo, esta sirve como una arteria importante. 
La vía en sí es una carretera primaria, sin embargo después del enlace en Boulevard San Juan Bosco sirve como arterial de importancia para colectores como Boulevard el Saucillo, Boulevard Torre León o Boulevard Balcones de la Joya que en cuestión podrían ir como terciarias o secundarias. Al menos como residente local es la función que he visto en la zona.
WahibaSands (2025-01-13 20:38:20+00:00): Hello, Tadeo_Gonzalez. Thanks for reaching out. I changed this to tertiary following the guidance provided on the OSM wiki for tertiary highways (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtertiary). This street serves to move traffic away from narrower or quieter streets and provides connectivity to León-Aguascalientes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203541699), a more prominent highway in this region. Additionally it provides access to the residential zones in this area, which is characteristic of many tertiary roads.

The primary highway that was upgraded was also dead ending and did not provide consistent connectivity to the overall highway network (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway). I can see that the infrastructure of this highway is being renovated and agree that this could eventually be a primary highway but at this time I felt it was more fitting as a tertiary highway. With that said many editors interpret highway classifications differently, and if you have knowledge of this area I can defer to your classification choice along this highway. 

traducción automática:

Hola, Tadeo_Gonzalez gracias por contactarme, cambié esto a terciaria siguiendo la guía proporcionada en OSM wiki para carreteras terciarias (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtertiary). Esta calle sirve para alejar el tráfico de las calles más estrechas o tranquilas y proporciona conectividad a León-Aguascalientes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203541699) una carretera más importante en esta región. Además, proporciona acceso a las zonas residenciales de esta área, todas características de las carreteras terciarias.

La carretera principal que se mejoró también era un callejón sin salida y no proporcionaba una conectividad constante con la red general de carreteras, una parte crucial de la jerarquía de clasificación de carreteras (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway). Puedo ver que la infraestructura de esta carretera se está renovando y estoy de acuerdo en que eventualmente podría ser una carretera principal, pero en este momento sentí que era más adecuada como una carretera terciaria. Dicho esto, muchos editores interpretan las clasificaciones de carreteras de manera diferente: si usted tiene conocimiento de esta área y es local, puedo remitirme a su elección de clasificación a lo largo de esta carretera.
Taksine (2025-01-14 11:08:15+00:00): 你在干什么？！
cavillas (2025-01-14 13:00:49+00:00): 肾仔
JesseFTW (2025-01-10 22:24:36+00:00): It looks like this changeset included a larger area than you might have meant. :-) Unless all of these changes were fixing the East Coast Greenway?
Eric Sofen (2025-01-10 22:28:27+00:00): Yeah, it's all working on the ordering of the East Coast Greenway (MA) relation. So it covers a big area, but there were no spatial changes to any individual members of the relation (moving nodes, etc.) - I try to commit those separately.
Stalker61 (2025-01-19 11:34:36+00:00): Может уже хватит на сервисные проезды residential лепить?
deepmapuser (2025-01-14 13:01:57+00:00): 请问下，你是负责修正错误的吗？我正在学习这个平台使用，所以，过程中做了几个错误测试
flex16 (2025-03-25 23:46:06+00:00): Du hast zwar Recht, dass diese Straße nie eine Kreisstraße war, das ist jedoch nicht unbedingt ausschlaggebend. Diese Straße ist eine wichtige Verbindungsstraße zwischen Veitsteinbach und Rückers, welche auch ziemlich gut ausgebaut ist. Deshalb habe ich sie wieder zu tertiary hochgestuft. Das möchte ich dir nur mit auf den Weg geben. VG
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
phoenixsaigon1698 (2025-01-09 08:26:04+00:00): Em ơi, em để chỉ 18526084 được đi thẳng từ 773077657 qua 28924645 là nhầm rồi nhé. xe hoàn toàn có thể quẹo trái từ Hàng Khoai qua Nguyễn Thiếp.
anti-romantic (2025-01-09 11:15:49+00:00): Добрый день! Для проездов к производственным зданиям следует использовать теги проездов - highway=service 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dservice

И, пожалуйста, не используйте тег layer=1, если при отправке правок возникает ошибка пересечения дорог и зданий. В этом случае стоит вручную подвинуть дорогу или здание
Stalker61 (2025-01-11 11:23:05+00:00): А ничего, что это дорога предназначенная для сельхозтехники, а не для авто? Какого ... тогда удалять, если масла нет в голове.
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
monhiko (2025-01-09 08:09:11+00:00): 绘图时不要把小区范围当成建筑画哦！
mcliquid (2025-01-09 10:28:52+00:00): Lies dir bitte mal die Wiki-Seite zu taktilem Belag durch und beachte dies bei der nächsten Frage: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tactile_paving
Fabian007 (2025-01-09 18:07:52+00:00): Hallo mcliquid,

Danke, für den info!

Ich werde es mal noch durchlesen, und werde es das Nächste mal darauf aufpassen.

Ich wünsche dir einen schönen Abend noch!

MFG Fabianbuecheler
mcliquid (2025-01-09 10:26:13+00:00): Die Oberfläche gilt für den gesamten Wegverlauf, nicht nur für die ersten 2 Meter. Bitte beachten!
Fabian007 (2025-01-09 18:15:37+00:00): Hallo mccliquid,

Danke, für den hinweiß!

Ich werde das nächste mal aufpassen.

Ich wünsche dir einen schönen Abend noch!

MFG Fabianbuecheler
Fischkopp0815 (2025-01-09 08:01:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/962967590

Der Name "Solarstromanlage" ist ein beschreibender Name. Die übrigen Tags sagen doch schon alles.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen unter "name ist nur der Name"
mavl (2025-05-13 15:09:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mcliquid (2025-01-09 10:24:19+00:00): Die Hausnummer 7 ist hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238987080
Das Gebäude ist die Nummer 8.
Fabian007 (2025-01-09 18:18:00+00:00): Hallo Mcqulid,

Danke, für das verbessern dieser hausnummer!

Ich wünsche dir einen schönen Abend noch!

MFG Fabianbuecheler
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
BCNorwich (2025-01-09 07:58:15+00:00): Hi, Your fiction has been reverted. 

You are welcome to add genuine features to OSM, need help just ask. 

Regards Bernard.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 00:52:11+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164876409
Youness_ss (2025-01-11 13:28:52+00:00): This road is opened yesterday and thanks for editing 😄
nona mostafa (2025-01-12 11:49:02+00:00): Hello Agadir_edits
Thank you for your information, I already modified them to operation
Best regards,
nona mostafa
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
BCNorwich (2025-01-09 08:19:38+00:00): No park here, fiction removed.

Your actions cast the company in a bad light.
Peter Newman (2025-05-18 10:53:59+00:00): Did I put https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12470289765 in the wrong place @Jmv61, or are there two adjacent cafes? I think I was a bit suspicious there was a missing building or something?
Peter Newman (2025-05-18 10:55:15+00:00): Indeed the aerial imagery shows a wedge shaped building in the gap, I believe the cafe is in there.
Jmv61 (2025-05-18 12:08:34+00:00): The good place is on the building.
Thanks
Peter Newman (2025-05-18 18:50:50+00:00): Thanks for confirming, I've deleted your one and moved mine as it had a bit more info, and added some more from their website too, in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166444451
Colbertson (2025-01-09 16:13:36+00:00): Tu atstāji name:etymology:wikidata tegus.
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:08:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
橘ヒカリ (2025-01-10 09:47:32+00:00): 您好，您的变更集有如下问题：
1，按照工务定义，动车走行线属于正线，不需要使用service=yard标签，请删除，并添加usage=branch标签。
2，根据国铁工电部标准，红岛动车走行A、红岛动车走行B的线编号分别为1552、1553，请分别添加到ref标签中。
再次感谢对OSM的贡献！
紬ヴェンダース (2025-01-11 05:00:11+00:00): 已修正，thx
Strubbl (2025-01-09 19:24:46+00:00): Der Laden daneben ist bereits als Wäscherei gemappt, hier war mal ein Eisladen und der steht weiterhin leer.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161181877
Strubbl (2025-01-09 19:30:34+00:00): Der Laden daneben ist bereits als Wäscherei gemappt, hier war mal ein Eisladen und der steht weiterhin leer.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161182032
Strubbl (2025-01-09 19:31:33+00:00): siehe auch den nebenstehenden Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2381638005 wo die Wäscherei bereits erfasst ist
phoenixsaigon1698 (2025-01-09 08:11:42+00:00): 3.  no left turn for car from Nguyen Van Cu to Tran Hung Dao (towards Ben Thanh).
4. no left turn for car from Nguyen Van Cu -> Tran Hung Dao (towards District 5)
5. no u turn for car from Nguyen Van Cu to Nguyen Van Cu (towards District 8)
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-01-14 00:31:44+00:00): Please provide a source for the change.
Mario Lambrini (2025-01-14 13:46:58+00:00): https://www.comune.verbania.it/Novita/Avvisi/Al-via-il-18-dicembre-l-inversione-del-senso-unico-della-Beata-Giovannina-a-Suna
Mario Lambrini (2025-01-14 13:48:47+00:00): https://www.comune.verbania.it/ocmultibinary/download/7814/144778/1/15a8b79a6d35815fade6693e48173b6e.pdf/file/Ord%2B628-24%2BVia%2BTRoubetzkoy%2BVia%2BCastelli%2B%25283%2529.pdf
murble (2025-01-09 09:24:39+00:00): Have you surveyed this path?
phoenixsaigon1698 (2025-01-09 08:32:22+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/leaderboard?lat=21.039738734272&lng=105.85087233233&z=17&user=hn_right_2&pKey=616259520754266&focus=photo&x=0.486470400196358&y=0.6569574883654428&zoom=0
Bierphysik (2025-04-16 08:09:02+00:00): Moin. place= und amenity=parking auf dem gleichen Objekt ist mE etwas widersprüchlich bzgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Ein_Objekt,_ein_OSM-Element - Ich baue das mal etwas um, schaus Dir vll mal an. Als "Basis" für den place= nehme ich die ALKIS Daten.
Bierphysik (2025-04-16 08:09:34+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165015163#map=19/49.988719/8.671565
Senihtu (2025-04-16 12:27:32+00:00): Jo. kannst Du so machen. Mir ging es darum, daß es zu vorhandenem addr:place auch den entsprechenden Platz gibt. An der Geometrie wollte ich möglichst wenig machen.
Etwas unschön finde ich, daß jetzt der Parkplatz nicht vollständig Teil des FLJ-Platzes ist sondern darüber hinaus ragt.
schönen Tag noch!
Bierphysik (2025-04-16 13:39:07+00:00): Das liegt daran, dass die außenliegenden Parkplätze im Süden nicht extra gemappt sind und uU auch nicht zum Platz gehören, oder? Ich pass es mal an, schau mal drauf: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165030040
martianfreeloader (2025-12-27 16:36:15+00:00): Hi,
Can you help with this note? You mapped allotments, but another user says there aren't any.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5102185
miklosakos (2026-03-19 16:54:09+00:00): Dear martianfreeloader, thanks for the notice, and sorry for the late answer. Today I took a walk there, and I hold my opinion that they are garden allotments, although not very significant ones. See my remarks at the unresolved note pin.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-01-09 14:37:17+00:00): 朋友你好，很高兴能看到OSM中有新用户，欢迎你的到来
不过在绘制的时候可能出了一些错误，比如错误的在面要素上使用了含有building=yes的标签

如 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1349734211/history/1

欢迎您加群参与讨论 
QQ群 290278518 
TG群 @osmchina

祝好
maro21 (2025-01-09 18:55:53+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#Why_should_I_use_Changeset_Comments?
Dimacn (2025-01-12 11:23:45+00:00): Скажите, по какой причине были понижены статусы дорог 01К-53, 01Н-3301, 01Н-1307 и др. с tertiary до unclassified ? Эти дороги подпадают под соглашение о классификации дорог, цитирую: "highway=tertiary соединяющие районные центры с сёлами, а также несколько сёл между собой". Эти дороги допускается отмечать как tertiary, как и было. Дорога до Гоношихи 01Н-1307 тем более должна быть tertiary т.к. соединяет районный центр Заринск. Классификация дорог тут: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification

Во-вторых, по какой причине вы проставили ограничение скорости maxspeed=40 на загородних дорогах, например http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96779608 и maxspeed=30 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215012360 ? Там стоят знаки ограничения скорости?

В-третьих, вы оставили несколько фрагментов дорог со статусом tertiary которые теперь стали изолятами, например  1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/737493544 2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/736629650 и др.

Я исправлю всё это назад на указанных дорогах.
4004 (2025-01-13 00:07:35+00:00): разве 81 не ближе к берегу?
Rodrigo Rega (2025-01-09 23:28:53+00:00): Hello, you added a URL to the email tag. Could you please fix it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161161093
DerMusikkritiker (2025-06-27 12:17:56+00:00): Die letzte Änderung von Hofweg 6a, 6b, 6 hat Fehler hinzugefügt. Zwischen den Häusern sind Schuppen gebaut, die Häuser sind komplett durch die Schuppen verbunden. Jedoch sind die Schuppen ca in der Mitte baulich getrennt, die linken / rechten Hälften gehören auch zu dem linken / rechten Haus.
Kann man da eine vorherige Version wiederherstellen? Die war deutlich besser, man müsste nur die Gebäudewände entsprechend verbinden...
baum10 (2025-06-28 10:51:05+00:00): Hallo, ich habe die Schuppen getrennt  von dem Haus gezeichnet.
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Hufkratzer (2025-01-09 21:53:38+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1349737074 ist keine Reitanlage, das ist ein Reitplatz, so wie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1237290374
PizzaTreeIsland (2025-01-09 21:58:39+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe das korrigiert.
mcliquid (2025-01-09 10:22:00+00:00): Grüß dich! Schau dir gerne mal die Wiki-Seite zu "parking=street_side" an. Alle Parkplätze die du angelegt hast, sind als "street_side" anstatt "surface" einzustufen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:parking=street_side

Danke dir!
gscholz (2025-03-11 08:21:06+00:00): Hi ev_pro,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=46.08773&lat=42.73565&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=161162006

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and look ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2025-04-08 06:15:29+00:00): Hi ev_pro, 
these errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
bxl-forever (2025-01-09 13:39:25+00:00): Welcome back!  First edit after 13 years, cool!

Just one thing.  We prefer not to delete shops when they close.  Instead, retag them as an empty shop, so that we keep the history of how places changed with time.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

We fixed this one.
Spirou (2025-01-09 14:40:06+00:00): Hi, thanks for pointing this out and fixing it for me. I learned something.
LordGarySugar (2025-01-13 15:49:46+00:00): Thanks for fixing, I promise I did make a note to come back and fix it myself!
rempshaener (2025-01-10 20:24:41+00:00): Hallo,
noch mal einige Hinweise:
- Ein größerer Teil der "drain" dürfte "ditch" sein.
- Das Verbinden von Wasserwegen mit Landuses ergibt keinen Sinn.
- Überfahrungen der Gräben sollten mit tunnel=culvert erfasst werden.
- Bitte die Warnhinweise von iD beachten.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2025-01-10 20:49:08+00:00): Da du hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/691717040 eine Grenze verschoben hast, habe ich diese Änderung rückgängig gemacht.
Viele Grüße
mavl (2025-05-13 15:09:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
SomeoneElse (2025-01-11 10:35:05+00:00): Hello,
OpenStreetMap is a map of real things in the real world.  Don't add made-up names.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
SomeoneElse (2025-01-11 10:35:41+00:00): Salve,
OpenStreetMap è una mappa di cose reali nel mondo reale. Non aggiungere nomi inventati.
Cordiali saluti,
Andy Townsend, a nome del Data Working Group di OSM
Sigmund73 (2025-01-11 11:04:41+00:00): It's surveyed, as declared in changeset comment.

https://ibb.co/mbkBrPk
SomeoneElse (2025-01-11 11:07:21+00:00): How come the stall at the back isn't labelled "Stalin" then?
Sigmund73 (2025-01-12 10:02:03+00:00): Your sarcasm don't help OSM. Please revert your deletion.
SomeoneElse (2025-01-12 10:27:18+00:00): It's not sarcasm. Both signs are clearly unofficial. One an a4 piece of paper temporarily attached to a wall for the photo, the other a graffito sprayed on it.  If anything, "stalin" is likely to be the more permanent of the two
mavl (2025-05-13 15:08:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].