piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-01-01 08:03:23+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13422084423 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "chapistería"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-08 10:38:44+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176978496
NeisBot (2026-01-01 08:03:26+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13396026410 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Herbal wellness shop in Meridian MS"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-08 10:38:45+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176978497
onterof (2026-01-01 10:56:11+00:00): Bei network bitte einheitlich long oder short benutzen, d.h. bei Änderung am Route-Master auch bei den Zugrelationen mitziehen sonst ist es inkonsistent.
bernward1 (2026-01-01 14:21:57+00:00): Habe die Route und Masterroute synchronisiert.
Mir würde network=VRM vollkommen ausreichen. :short und :long halte ich für überflüssig. Aber ich will sie auch nicht löschen, weil sie vielleicht irgendwer nutzt.
network:long füge ich ein, wenn irgenwer network in den voll ausgeschriebenen Namen geändert hat und dann network:short zusätzlich eingefügt hat. Vielleicht hat er ja irgend einen Grund dass er den langen Namen sehen will. Meist ist es jedoch nur die unzutreffenden Vorschläge des id -Editors die einfach bestätigt werden.
Üblich ist jedoch unter network=VRM anzugeben. (bei Busslinien bin ich mir sicher, da ich da beim mappen viel unterwegs bin)
onterof (2026-01-01 14:31:32+00:00): Danke,
ja da herrscht i.A viel durcheinander, im Wiki steht z.B. auch network immer als der ausführliche Name, id (vlt. auch andere Software?) zeigt dann auch ein Logo des Verbunds als Vorschau an. 
Die Kurz-Varianten sind im Normalgebrauch (meine Meinung) auch praktischer. Aber solang's pro Relation zusammenpasst ist das am Ende auch recht egal.
felipeeugenio (2025-12-31 20:55:59+00:00): Nota resuelta #5112574
felipeeugenio (2025-12-31 20:57:56+00:00): Corrección: Nota resuelta #5112592
Tamani Wolf (2025-12-31 21:10:20+00:00): Der zustand der Schwellen, des Unterbau und der Baumbestände im Gleisverlauf läd der versuchung ein den tag "railway=abandoned" zu verwenden.
watmildon (2026-01-26 00:55:29+00:00): Hello Deven!

Thanks for contributing. As a point of practice, it's greatly preferable to create smaller individual features with their own tags. This area being a collection of a few enormous multi-polygons makes ongoing maintenance a huge bother. 

I know iD makes is easy to generate these monsters but they really are a huge source of pain down the line. Much better to keep is simple. Break features up. Don't include everything together in out object just because it will have the same tag (the wetland here could be lots of small pieces for example). If you have to have an outer and with an inner cut out of it it's best for the outers and inners to be complete rings in their own right etc.

Anyhow, the geometry and work looks really good! my only feedback is about the representation.

Happy mapping!

Matt
Nakaner (2026-01-17 19:41:34+00:00): Hallo,

hast du bei den neu erfassten Haltestellen irgendwie verifiziert, dass die Koordinaten korrekt sind?

Viele Grüße

Michael
eggie (2026-01-01 10:28:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback...   Tip Geef concreet aan wat je hebt aangepast. Dat stellen medemappers op prijs. 
Pas ook niet te veel aan i één changeset.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Rainero (2026-03-29 20:25:21+00:00): Revert changeset/180602272
wegen nicht zulässiger Quelle (Bayernatlas).
AndyB_66 (2026-01-15 14:22:18+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
NeisBot (2026-01-01 13:38:55+00:00): Hi Thomas Shuster, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added residential apartments, detention basin, removed parking amenity"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #NoComment
NeisBot (2026-01-01 08:03:28+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/2158667128 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Health and wellness center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-08 10:38:46+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176687960
Thanks @chath_tsu
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-26 11:38:46+00:00): Hello!

You used
craft=stonemasonry
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13422222122/history

Have you maybe meant
craft=stonemason
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Gumball3000 (2026-01-26 21:32:20+00:00): Fixed! Thanks for the heads up.
NeisBot (2026-01-01 08:02:18+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1413317399 v2 | 9 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176688219
Frans S (2026-01-01 12:17:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Rather accurate mapped.
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key while selected.
Where buildings are partly covered by trees, please extrapolate the rooflines rather than following the treelines.
Bing shows rather poor images her.
Switch to  Esri world imagery for a better image. Correct the offset to Bing.
I could add anoter 65 buildings  (mostly with dark brown roofs.
Best regards and keep mapping.
Mastrick_Mapper (2025-12-31 23:02:23+00:00): Changeset comment: Added buildings.
voltairovicz (2026-01-01 19:37:32+00:00): Hej, tak sobie przejrzałem tę zmianę i się zastanawiam, czy przypadkiem ulica Janiszewska pod Lasem Kapturskim miała nie przejśc dla gminy Zakrzew? Bo jest wciąż po staremu
TranslatorPS (2026-01-02 14:15:51+00:00): Być może coś było mówione. Ja wdrożyłem tylko zmiany, co do których dostałem dokładne mapki geodezyjne :)
rohieb (2025-12-31 23:46:36+00:00): Weitere Quellen: 
• https://www.kreiszeitung.de/lokales/niedersachsen/altes-waisenhaus-in-niedersachsen-ist-heute-ein-lost-place-93377247.html
• https://www.braunschweiger-zeitung.de/braunschweig/article216274429/Das-verwaiste-Waisenhaus-Wo-die-Zeit-stehen-geblieben-ist.html (Paywall)
RealBenAnderson (2026-01-01 17:05:46+00:00): This was done to prevent routing from the Joong Boo Market parking lot exit to an immediate left turn at the E Golf Rd / Natl Pky intersection, which requires crossing several busy lanes of traffic. Mapping the turn lane ensures that the earlier exit will be taken to give drivers reasonable time to change multiple lanes before making that left turn.
SafwatHalaby (2026-01-02 08:51:39+00:00): Just noting that the missing translations logic worked as we expected, e.g. at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1803056122

Do you have any insights regarding the note text? Last time we discussed it a more "instructive" note was considered so that those who don't know anything about the bot know what to do. You proposed "name:ar and name:en could not be found in official imported data, and may be out of date or missing. You may update them as needed."

Are you still on board with this? Would you like me to make a pull request?

Discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/import-bus-stops-from-gtfs/117873/103
NeatNit (2026-01-02 09:50:14+00:00): Yes, I forgot about that! It would help if you make a pull request.
HugoC01 (2026-01-01 18:55:28+00:00): The first changeset of 2026!!!!
theorangetheme (2026-01-02 06:59:30+00:00): Woo! First changeset of 2026! Mappy new year from Orange, California, United States!
watmildon (2026-01-02 07:28:55+00:00): May we all have a mappy new year! Wooo 2026!!
bhietsch (2026-01-09 14:04:17+00:00): Hi rennur - this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1463263289
appears to be a duplicate of: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/175474
West Point is a census designated place/military reservation and not a city. Since the original boundary is more representative of West Point's boundaries, I'm going to delete the new way unless you have any opposition.
bkil (2026-01-01 13:20:41+00:00): Nem ezen a pár méteren fog múlni, de megjegyzem, hogy Magyartelek nekem jobban tetszett az előző helyén, mert minden POI-hoz közelebb volt, mint erre az üres területre leszúrt koordinátán.
frosm (2026-01-12 12:27:36+00:00): Bonjour,
as-tu vu les alertes du validateurs ? il y a pleins d'intersection entre voies.
je me demande particulièrement pourquoi l'attribut pont a été retiré de https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4728119/history/25
bechirabidi (2026-01-12 12:31:51+00:00): Bonjour, je n'ai pas vraiment fait attention, c'est l'une de mes premières contributions à OSM, comment je peux y remédier ?
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-03 20:22:52+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11501180097

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
JAYBEEE77 (2026-01-04 21:17:44+00:00): Nie rozumiem... czy zmiana nazwy drogi z "wewnętrznej" na drogę "w strefie zamieszkania" to nadmiarowa informacja?
John_Doe_Indiana (2026-01-01 01:40:19+00:00): Specifically this store I mean.
4004 (2026-01-01 20:01:40+00:00): hi, what is common about service:vehicle:towing? I am not sure it's a direct replacement for any of the tags you removed, and don't think this service is offered
thetornado76 (2026-01-01 20:57:23+00:00): Hello, isn't accident assistance a sub-type of towing? At least that's how I've understood it so far. I have changed it back again.
4004 (2026-01-02 08:09:41+00:00): thanks - if it was "accident assistance" I would've agreed. but it was "accident service", which I took to mean post-accident structural repair
NeisBot (2026-01-01 02:06:16+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 362 of your last 390 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=17341060
Ropino (2026-01-14 21:44:09+00:00): Hallo,
wofür sind die 8 Nodes mit "tag=bogus" da und welche Quelle ist dazu #176664267 ?
Hb- (2026-01-15 00:59:24+00:00): Bogus war eine vorläufige Markierung.
#176664267 bezeichnet den Änderungssatz.
TheSwavu (2026-01-02 08:21:45+00:00): Hi,

We don't have VAT in Australia. What you appear to be tagging is a business' ABN, which is more commonly tagged as operator:ref:abn https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/australia-oceania:australia/keys/operator%3Aref%3Aabn

Happy mapping.
pwbriggs (2026-01-01 04:52:54+00:00): Thank you! This information is very helpful!

If you're interested in learning more about OpenStreetMap, please feel free to reach out! OSM US also has a Slack that's very helpful if you have any mapping questions: https://slack.openstreetmap.us/

Once again thanks for your contributions, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Happy new year!
Reitstoen (2026-01-01 03:42:39+00:00): Removed bicycle=no from trail that is featured on https://www.trailforks.com/trails/husfjellet/ and https://www.terrengsykkel.no/stisykling/stisykling-pa-senja and other blogs...
TheSwavu (2026-01-01 05:04:39+00:00): Hi, 

Phone numbers should be in E.123 format ie with +61 country code https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers 

Usually websites should be the https rather than http versions (there may still be a bot that comes around and changes these). 

Times in opening hours should be HH:MM so 8 AM is 08:00 and 8:30 PM 20:30. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours (Don't worry if this pages stops making sense at some point, literally no one gets to the end without hitting the WTF ;-) )

I have fixed these ones.
SeaB33 (2026-01-01 06:35:40+00:00): thank you! will remember thius for next time :)
i did add the https link so not sure if a bot changed it
Kiana_Kaslana (2026-02-18 14:32:19+00:00): ？
Tonmi pasoy (2026-01-09 08:01:54+00:00): mae sot city municipality boundary is outdated
https://ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/documents/1844439.pdf
muralito (2026-01-05 22:02:37+00:00): Un adelantado a su epoca el Charly...
Sébastien Pi (2026-02-13 14:10:02+00:00): Salut,

Les cedez-le-passage sont seulement en vis-à-vis pour la piste cyclable ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13422793921
Tosenbo (2026-02-13 23:19:41+00:00): Bonjour c'est un Cédez-le-Passage pour que les automobilistes ne coupent pas la routes au cyclistes qui traversent via la Piste Cyclable
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-02 15:04:25+00:00): #DataImport

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap!

In this and some of your recent changesets, you’ve added a large number of features that appear to share very similar tagging. Could you please tell us more about the source of this data and how it was collected? Specifically, I’d like to understand whether this was a data import or derived from an external dataset.

If an external source was used, could you also confirm that its licence is compatible with OpenStreetMap’s ODbL requirements?

Best regards,
Pascal
user_10491097 (2026-01-03 20:23:59+00:00): hi;
all the edits are done by hand, using only local knowledge;
my objective is to improve sidewalks and footways for walking navigation and local accuracy of existing paths through the city; if you believe there is some issue with the way i mapped it please let me know what would be the best practice; 
thank you 
 thank you;
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-04 07:57:19+00:00): Thank you!

Best regards, Pascal
mavl (2026-01-03 15:42:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 176787013 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: incompatible source].
mavl (2026-01-03 15:42:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 176787013 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: incompatible source].
applecuckoo (2026-01-04 02:04:41+00:00): hi! as a general rule, please don't put edits across several different countries in the same changeset. this makes changesets harder to review and generally annoys mappers. Thank you!
fortera_au (2026-01-04 22:01:47+00:00): Is "office=game development" a commonly used tag? I don't think it really is, this should probably go back to office=it, and a relevant sub-tag added if one exists.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176693411
mavl (2026-01-03 15:42:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 176787013 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: incompatible source].
mavl (2026-01-03 15:43:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 176787013 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: incompatible source].
user_22465256 (2026-01-06 21:22:33+00:00): What is this nonsense? Now every edit within this city sized block has to be set as private instead of just the access points? And you even made I-5 private? Please think again about this edit
user_22465256 (2026-01-06 22:09:18+00:00): This edit also destroyed all the access limitations within the base. Excuse my language above, but this edit is still needs to be undone and discussed further.
Omnific (2026-01-06 22:34:51+00:00): Issues corrected. Review as desired.
user_22465256 (2026-01-06 22:42:15+00:00): Any area on base that had more restrictive access is now set at the same level as everywhere else so routing will attempt to go through locked down areas. Any area on base with permissive access to the public is now set to private and will not route. Please entirely undo this edit. If you don’t know how to, I can.
chath_tsu (2026-01-17 02:31:21+00:00): Hi! I've noticed you recently added some bike lanes that you mapped as bike paths. Please note that, for bike ways to be mapped as separate ways and tagged as cycle paths, they have to be not inherently part of the roadway and physically separated from vehicle travel lanes. For a roadside bike path, there has to be physical barriers separating it from traffic (eg. curbs, jersey barriers, guardrails, planter strips). Otherwise, on-road bike lanes, including those with painted buffer but no physical barrier, are represented as cycleway= tags on the main roadway ways. You can find more information here: highway=cycleway and cycleway=*. Thanks for your effort and happy mapping!
pancakelover80 (2026-01-19 16:05:43+00:00): Thank you for letting me know @chath_tsu! I will fix that as soon as i have time :D
chath_tsu (2026-01-19 19:14:14+00:00): Thank you I appreciate it! I think (?) I fixed most thing but you are of course more than welcome to double check :)
mavl (2026-01-01 11:38:02+00:00): Здравствуйте.  

Смотреть Яндекс Карты и использовать их для уточнения других карт запрещено правилами Яндекса.

"4.6. Любая информация, используемая в Сервисе, предназначена исключительно для личного некоммерческого использования. При этом любое копирование Данных, их воспроизведение, переработка, распространение, доведение до всеобщего сведения (опубликование) в сети Интернет, любое использование в средствах массовой информации и/или в коммерческих целях без предварительного письменного разрешения правообладателя запрещается, за исключением случаев, прямо предусмотренных функциональными возможностями сервиса, настоящими Условиями, условиями использования других сервисов Яндекса или документами, указанными в п. 1.2. настоящих Условий."

https://yandex.ru/legal/maps_termsofuse/ru/?lang=ru

В OpenStreetMap нельзя добавлять данные из источников, защищённых авторским правом.

osm.org/copyright
mavl (2026-01-03 15:42:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 176787013 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: incompatible source].
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-02-14 09:17:59+00:00): شكرا على مساهمتك في الخريطة، ونرجوا منكم عدم إدخال معلومات عشوائية للخريطة
Hufkratzer (2026-01-01 18:14:06+00:00): Hi,
Shouldn't https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1463391108 be tagged like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1460910585 ?
seattlefyi (2026-01-02 07:33:13+00:00): Hi, thanks for the feedback! On second look, I agree (and have changed it).
NeisBot (2026-01-01 13:16:20+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13423247324 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Math tutoring center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-09 06:55:15+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176695324
Thanks @user_5359
NeisBot (2026-01-01 13:35:32+00:00): Hi Mohmadi2009, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added dance venue, viewpoint, confectionery shop, chalet, and crosses with names"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #NoComment
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-01 13:01:08+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее

Не нужно писать Лесополоса в name. Это не имя собственное.
nikimaxim (2026-01-05 04:12:02+00:00): Как правильно заполнять свойства для данных лесополос?
Возможно, я где то не увидел тип лесных насаждений и есть в них «лесополосы»?
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-05 15:17:19+00:00): А в чём примечательность лесополос? Это такой же лес
nikimaxim (2026-01-08 07:03:38+00:00): В моём понимании лес это что-то больше чем пару деревьев. И везде эти насаждения называют «лесополосой»
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-08 15:58:46+00:00): https://osm.wiki/RU:Россия/Голосования/Лесная_растительность

> Тег natural=wood следует использовать для обозначения участков земли с преимущественно лесной растительностью, независимо от формы собственности, обслуживаемости и иных характеристик (включая защитные лесополосы вдоль автомобильных и железных дорог, лесистые насаждения в городских парках, скверах и жилых зонах)

Из геометрии понятно, что это лесополоса. Увы, теги, чтобы обозначить рукотворность леса мне неизвестны.
rarad74 (2026-01-03 14:27:48+00:00): Salut. Nu se pun strazi ca primary or seccondaruy roads decat pe drumurile judetene sau comunale care au indicativ pentru asa ceva. Restul strazilor rezidentiale si pe care nu se desfasoara trafic intens se pun ca rezidentiale. Aleile de acces in curtile oamenilor le poti une ca living street sau service road.
Westbrooke117 (2026-01-03 07:00:32+00:00): Thank you very much. I appreciate the help!