piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-02-26 08:15:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13601948097 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Graphic design studio"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : « Studio de design graphique »
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-06 17:33:03+00:00): 🗑️🤖 Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/179457273

 If you believe this deletion was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
rarad74 (2026-02-26 08:56:56+00:00): Buna, Este a nu stiu cata oara cand pui aberatii pe harta. Nu exista nicio strada Vintila Voda acolo. Este Bulevardul Mircea Voda. Te rog nu mai pune informatii incorecte pe harta!
NeisBot (2026-02-26 08:15:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13601944224 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Plastic surgery clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-06 17:33:04+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179297512
PPete2 (2026-06-10 10:23:22+00:00): Hallo, du hast auf die Straße https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110529065 ein Radverbot getaggt. Kann das stimmen, denn dan wäre ja keine Rad-Zufahrt zu Haus 30 mehr möglich?
NeisBot (2026-02-26 08:24:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13601934096 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Plastic surgery clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-06 17:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179457281
(No visible changes after review)
aceman444 (2026-06-16 19:18:11+00:00): Dakujeme za informaciu, ale nevyuzivanost sa nepise do typu budovy (building), ale samostatnou znackou disused=yes.
Olga Lomako (2026-02-26 08:28:06+00:00): Fixed road geometry according to Esri World Imagery #mapbox_missing_roads
osmviborg (2026-02-26 08:36:31+00:00): School eller College? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445734465
AE35 (2026-02-26 08:54:40+00:00): polygonen vil jeg sige er College for det hele
Kovoschiz (2026-02-27 08:29:38+00:00): Should use `=busway` (despite Carto not rendering)
george1201 (2026-02-26 18:23:17+00:00): Laut Website ist das Hofstüble ja (auch) eine Pferdepension. Im Zusammenhang mit dem Knoten amenity=restaurant irritiert mich das horse=yes aber schon etwas. Ohne Ortskenntniss zu haben, behaupte ich mal kühn, dass Pferde im Restaurant nicht willkommen sind. Ja ich sehe, dass dieser Tag schon lange hier eingetragen ist. Aber deine Änderung wäre doch eine gute Gelegenheit gewesen, dies zu ändern.
george1201 (2026-02-26 18:29:31+00:00): Nicht das Hofstüble ist die Pferdepension, sondern der Winkler Hof.
Scout Jens (2026-02-27 05:59:30+00:00): Ich gebe Dir in allen Punkten Recht. So genau hatte ich nicht geschaut und habe nur Website und Namen geändert. 
Jetzt bin ich allerdings schon wieder unterwegs...
Scout Jens (2026-02-27 06:02:43+00:00): ich habs noch schnell geändert - Danke
george1201 (2026-02-27 06:23:40+00:00): Danke. Schönen sonnigen Tag draußen.
NeisBot (2026-02-26 08:42:52+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13601923282 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cleaning service office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-06 17:33:05+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179109258
Natfoot (2026-03-13 23:49:28+00:00): the edit does not conform to OSM standards nor would it show properly or as desired. it has been fixed by another user in this changset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179109258
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 01:47:48+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and explicit source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184205200

https://osm.org/changeset/184205200
micheleOSM3 (2026-02-26 08:50:25+00:00): I forgot the comment in the changeset:
Moved name=* to description=* see discussion on talk: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/stage-and-name-in-long-distance-hiking-routes-and-superroutes/141480
kitsee (2026-02-27 22:50:48+00:00): I've reverted this change. Please do not blindly makes changes based on out of date imagery. The road alignment has been completely altered here and a new bridge was built when the A465 was dualled.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179152526
kitsee (2026-02-27 23:00:44+00:00): Sorry please disregard apparently my memory is failing, I even surveyed the final alignment for panoramax. I should have checked the images before i reverted. The north alignment was temopary while the road was under construction. the road now goes south again around the houses I've undone my revert now.
LiudmilaBareika (2026-03-02 13:11:59+00:00): No worries at all! Thank you for checking and for the clarification.
Best regards, Liudmila!
Dodko (2026-02-26 09:34:07+00:00): Názov ulice sa do adresy dáva keď je tam naozaj ulica a orientačné číslo, garáže majú zvyčajne len súpisné číslo bez ulice a orientačného.
ColbyTheWorldTraveler (2026-02-27 17:30:36+00:00): Dang, you've been going ham on Kwaj! It's a cool place!
codywindrose (2026-02-27 22:48:09+00:00): Yeah! The whole atoll. I have never been there though. I see you quite a lot in object history around here, I think you did stuff like added addresses and points of interest? I try to not change too much about points of interest because I really have no clue. Sometimes I space the nodes a bit more and place female/male bathrooms next to each other if they're all seemingly randomly in some building or I put POI node tags onto the building itself if it's just one POI. Another example is a pavilion with bathrooms and some barbecue thing, I put the barbecue POI onto a smaller building to the side which seems like a tent ... stuff like that. Or on Ebja/Ebeye/Epja, I noticed there's this same long building design with two small round buildings on each end, I kept adding those round buildings even where I couldn't see more than a smudge. I changed quite some island and passage names too, the source should be on all place=island nodes. Some map from the 80's or so provided by a cool radio guy. Even there it's already 2-3 different names for each Island, very confusing. But should be more accurate than those GNIS imported name nodes with coordinates rounded like 167.73333, off by Kilometers and somebody tried matching them to islands. I think I deleted all GNIS stuff except for Roi-Namur and Kwaj and the atoll. Not sure if we need it in OSM, I'll contact the people who originally added it and consult the wiki page on GNIS.
Aethonatic (2026-05-24 22:36:25+00:00): Hello, could you elaborate on the addition of "(Closed)" to the name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/951425574? If this is a temporary closure then it should be noted that tagging this is highly discouraged, per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features.
⇄ john paul jones & gringo (2026-05-27 11:59:36+00:00): 'elaborate' Well, I'll try. Shoe Zone is the name of this shop, it still says Shoe Zone above the shop but the shop is empty. It is tagged as branch=closed but I added closed to the name tag 'Shoe Zone (Closed)' so as to be clear to map readers that this particular shop is closed and not open, nor has it been taken on by somebody else. As I've already said it still says Shoe Zone above the shop. It does not look like a temporary closure... 
I hope this answers your query.
Aethonatic (2026-05-31 19:37:52+00:00): Thank you, I've gone ahead and tagged the Shoe Zone with shop=vacant as per conventions; old_name has been added to prevent confusion. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183463830
literan (2026-02-26 19:59:52+00:00): так, а зачем здесь слово "Банк" в названии? amenity=bank же.

мы ведь не пишем name=Магазин "Пятерочка"
kate_rocketdata (2026-02-27 10:11:37+00:00): Добрый день! Название исправили, будем иметь ввиду, спасибо!
Fraxi (2026-02-26 10:24:28+00:00): Защо сте направил тази промяна? Точно за блокове в квартали е прието в българската OSM общност да има "бл." пред номерата. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bg:WikiProject_Bulgaria#%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B8
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/94313
Ако са номера на улиците и ще добавяте имената на улиците към адресите, е друг въпрос. Но тогава ще трябва да се махне "кв. Железник"
eggie (2026-02-26 09:45:00+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Bedankt voor uw bijdrage.
Er was al een adresnode hier. Daar heb ik de info nu mee samengevoegd.

MVG
eggie
MappingMore (2026-03-01 16:59:15+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179218082
Dimitar155 (2026-06-09 12:01:11+00:00): Здравейте,

Благодаря за промяната! Телефонния номер на ЕН Такси изглежда непълен. В момента е само "042". Може ли да го коригирате?

Поздрави,
Митко
mueschel (2026-03-06 10:48:17+00:00): Hallo,
was ist denn "  parking:left:motor_vehicle = destination"?  "destination" macht bei Parkplätzen wenig Sinn, oder steht da ein "Anlieger frei" am Parkplatz?
Ltrlg (2026-02-27 12:02:08+00:00): En général, on fait plutôt building=construction + construction=* dans ce cas-là.
Sébastien Chopin (2026-03-03 14:59:03+00:00): Ajouté en tag
NeisBot (2026-02-26 10:09:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 74 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/86419079 v6 | 10 crossings
https://osm.org/way/250805972 v4 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/250805984 v10 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/6643262274 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179077097
MappingMore (2026-02-27 11:41:32+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179127343
FajrAl (2026-02-28 09:27:44+00:00): Changeset ini bukan hanya ada di Tangerang Selatan, namun juga area Dukuhbenda di Brebes.
f_husni (2026-03-16 04:04:26+00:00): halo, iya betul sudah saya cek memang benar ada beberapa di dukuhbenda, kemungkinan saya salah klik changeset comment di editor saya. terimakasih sudah mengingatkan. happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-02-26 10:15:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13602169621 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Garage door service"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-06 17:33:07+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179457282
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NorthCrab_upload (2026-03-01 05:12:38+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1483343801

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2026-02-26 10:24:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 45 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1080126368 v3 | 15 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1080127220 v2 | 15 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1080127149 v2 | 15 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179077695
gscholz (2026-03-02 08:06:56+00:00): Hi Wim Labie,
this changeset also created a lot of errors regarding a non valid landuse relation:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-0.69698&lat=37.98826&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14358741/history#map=16/37.98919/-0.69578

Please make yourself familiar about how to use multipolygons properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

You assembled a collection here, which is not a valid relation. I just fixed this relation.

Guido
aTarom (2026-02-26 15:50:48+00:00): De nuevo revierto cambios
ver
https://t.me/osmcat/71868
no consigo contactar con el usuario
NorthCrab_upload (2026-03-01 05:12:33+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13602237038

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
BaboucheVerte (2026-06-05 05:41:28+00:00): Heu... Vous avez rajoute des tags d'arbres aubrdsturang Aubrac burger. Je supprime.
infeeeee (2026-03-02 22:55:42+00:00): Hello

Pedestrians, bicycle traffic can still continue through, only cars have to turn. This was the reason this intersection was mapped that way. There are several similar intersections in the area, e.g. the next one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11963333831

Please restore connections between the 2 streets some way, like it was before your change, or add a small footway between them. 

Thank you, happy mapping!
World_Winner (2026-03-09 05:51:25+00:00): Hi infeeeee ,

Thank you for your explanation and for pointing out a similar example. I now understand the situation better and agree that maintaining non-motorized traffic is equally important.

I have made the corrections on the intersection in changeset #179286944 based on the example you shared.

Thank you for bringing this to my attention, and happy mapping to you too!
aixbrick (2026-02-26 12:26:51+00:00): Hello,
reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179082328. You ignored that there is an existing lane mapping on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411141749 representing the turning lane (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes). There is no reason for mapping it as separate way. Maybe the used router is the problem.
Regards
Joske1020 (2026-03-14 22:34:10+00:00): bedankt voor je aanpassingen! pas wel op dat je niet per ongeluk meer verplaatst dan je wilt, je hebt bijvoorbeeld per ongeluk de katerstraat een kanteel gegeven.. ik kijk ook nog even na of de hoefstraat ook een aanpassing nodig heeft
eggie (2026-02-26 11:37:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-26 11:36:17+00:00): Dag Quinten,
warnings:almost_junction:highway-highway 	1

Probleem opgelost.
MVG
eggie
Jonáš Hubáček (2026-03-02 09:08:46+00:00): Why it cant be highway? Its asphalt and it means its much faster than dirt roads
LakePoopó (2026-03-02 18:26:27+00:00): Hi Jonáš Hubáček,
I changed classification in the area to unclassified because this mainly leads to homes and some local traffic, however I can see an argument with changing this to tertiary. If you do, I can defer to your edits.
Jonáš Hubáček (2026-03-02 18:39:12+00:00): Ugandan's road architecture is quite different. Homes and houses are always all along bigger roads(doesnt matter asfalt or dirt) but mainly along asfalt roads.
Tbh I'm not an expert in osm in general. However my proposed classification makes sense to me here.
I was just curios how mine change affected your data when you changed it back?
LakePoopó (2026-03-04 05:42:22+00:00): Thanks for the question, I’m happy to further explain my reasoning here. 

The Highway Tag Africa page states that “road typology should be based on the road importance and not on the surface or the visual appearance of a road.” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa). This page also notes that secondaries are typically used for “Major transportation routes connecting cities and large towns” where tertiaries are for “Major transportation routes connecting towns and larger villages”. Classifying https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188319699 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/688879384 as tertiary makes sense because it connects villages within the denser, more populated area around Kapchorwa, whereas https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/382659656 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/382659169 branch into more remote areas serving smaller settlements. Additionally, secondaries serve “arterial” function in OSM Africa: they carry through-traffic over longer distances, connect major centers to each other, link collectors to other arterials or highways, and form part of a continuous network. The highways in question mainly serve local access and distribution rather than operating as a continuous through traffic corridor. 

That said, classification can be somewhat subjective, and I’m happy to defer to your assessment if you feel a different tagging would be better suited here. Hope you have a nice day!
Wanderer2000 (2026-02-27 08:05:35+00:00): Even ter info, in Nederland worden alle adressen geimporteerd uit de BAG als node. Daarom is er besloten om adressen niet op de gebouwen zelf te zetten. Ik zal het dubbele adres weer verwijderen.

Groetjes Wanderer
Piz Pachific (2026-02-26 16:24:47+00:00): Offensichtlich falsch verschobene landuse Fläche in folgendem Changeset wieder korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179092124
gscholz (2026-02-28 07:52:25+00:00): Hi Giuseppe4ne,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=14.99293&lat=41.67069&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Taya_S (2026-02-27 13:43:35+00:00): Reverted undiscussed automated edits by a badly functioning and likely unauthorised source by a sockpuppet account

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179132390
NeisRevert (2026-02-27 16:47:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/179140202
where the comment is: "Remove testdata"
ToniE (2026-02-26 11:54:22+00:00): Servus und Danke für den Eintrag.

Das 'landuse' ist auf der Karte ganz 'nett' anzuschauen, hat aber auf "Navis" keine Auswirkungen.

Da die Baustelle recht langzeitig ist, ist die allgemeine Vorgehensweise, die Straße "B 13" auf highway=construction zu setzen und zusätzlich construction=primary (der derzeitige Wert von highway) zu verwenden. Das wird von Navis verstanden und auf den Karten auch entsprechend angezeigt.

Eine kurzzeitige Sperrung wird mit einem 'conditional' gemapped, das verstehen viele Navis mittlerweile auch.

access:conditional = no @ (2026 Mar 30-2026 Apr 13) auf kurzen Stücken der Straßen um die Kriege-Kreuzung herum.

Bei weiteren Fragen bitte einfach melden

Viele Grüße
Toni aus Ottobrunn
ToniE (2026-02-26 11:58:33+00:00): Ich werde opening_date mal in end_date = 2026-11-01 (im ISO-Format) ändern und start_date = 2026-03-02 hinzufügen.
ToniE (2026-02-26 12:04:19+00:00): Oops, und dann werden wir (ich) uns wohl noch um den 361er Bus kümmern müssen. Mal schauen, was der MVV hierzu in den März-Fahrplandaten (GTFS) rausspuckt.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179080656#map=18/47.875469/11.706925&layers=T

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BY/DE-BY-MVV-Analysis.html#bus_361
Markt Holzkirchen (2026-02-26 12:16:08+00:00): Super, Danke für Deine Unterstützung!
ToniE (2026-02-27 10:34:48+00:00): Gerne!

Mir fiel noch ein, dass Navis unterschiedliche Update-Intervalle haben. OsmAnd zum Beispiel läd OSM-Daten immer am 1. eines Monats runter, bearbeitet sie und stellt die dann den (normalen, nicht-Abo) Benutzern ein paar Tage später zur Verfügung. Andere landen Daten einmal in der Woche, ...

Von daher war es hier gut, schon einmal mit access:conditional vor dem 1. März zu arbeiten, bevor highway=construction dann am 2. März aktiviert wird / werden könnte.

Die Standardkarte zeigt Veränderungen ja im Prinzip innerhalb weniger Minuten, das gilt leider nicht für alle Karten-Stile und Navis.

Beim MVV habe ich noch nicht herausfinden können, welche Strecke denn der 361er fahren wird. Die GTFS-Fahrplandaten des MVV enthalten nur die Haltestellen und Abfahrzeiten, nicht aber die Strecke (außer für München-Stadt, da gibt es GTFS von der MVG). Außer!? Ich werde mal einen Verbindungssuche auf der MVV-Webseite für Dienstag machen.
pelvis1665 (2026-02-26 11:37:43+00:00): Mistyped comment. Correction: Corrected, ways, nodes, buildings, added nodes, areas.
LySioS (2026-03-02 15:20:38+00:00): Bonjour Maxime,
inutile de pointer vers Google Maps, les cgu de leur service interdisent explicitement de s'en servir pour cartographier. Ta connaissance du terrain suffit
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179080909
HellMap (2026-02-26 13:01:11+00:00): Hello,

I made some fixes around here. Just wanted to clarify - the road now extends slightly further and there is a culvert for the ditch under it?
SalvisJ (2026-02-26 13:50:12+00:00): Hey,
Yes, culvert was built last Summer. Road is unpaved to provide access to real estate.