piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-03-06 17:38:56+00:00): Hi Christophedevdurable, and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear, difficult to understand, or consistently repetitive.

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment
NeisReview (2025-03-07 09:06:03+00:00): 👍 Thank you for your kind private message.

#HappyMapping
aixbrick (2025-03-06 12:32:00+00:00): Hello,
what is your source for "wrongly one-way tagged"? As far as I know that part is a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway#False_one-way_streets_(Faux_oneway) (see "note" of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31288034/history) and was mapped like suggested in point 3. Has this been changed so that the road is now open for everyone in both directions?
Regards
Broken Butler (2025-03-06 12:44:50+00:00): on further inspection you're right it's only both ways for buses. So adding `oneway:bus=no` is probably a better way to go, sorry :)
aixbrick (2025-03-06 13:02:58+00:00): Sorry, but your new edit is wrong too :-(. Now it looks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1364997088 is oneway from Marienstraße up to Hospitalgasse, but that is not the case. Only entering from the south is prohibited (except for bus, bicycle and emergency). To reflect this, only a very small part was tagged with oneway=yes. I think it is better to revert both of your edits.
Broken Butler (2025-03-06 13:12:24+00:00): based on what do you claim that it's not oneway up to hospitalgasse?
there are no driveways in the section and so the rule of it being oneway stands until the junction with hospitalgasse at which point people coming from either side of hospitalgasse have no way of knowing of that restriction ergo it's lifted. So what are you basing it on that it's not the case up to the junction?
The above explanation is at least the one given to me by my driving instructor when I made my driver's license in Germany.
Broken Butler (2025-03-06 13:15:32+00:00): feel free to revert them both if you feel very strongly about it, I just think that the oneway nature of the road isn't lifted until you hit either a junction at which that restriction isn't re-stated by signs or at least a driveway merges with the road. But neither of these is the case and there isn't even parking on the section of road, so realistically nobody would even start a journey in that section to go north unless they were parking illegally or just U-turning in the middle of it.

If you do choose to revert them, please add a `oneway:bus=no` tag at least :)
aixbrick (2025-03-06 13:47:09+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163285982.

I think you (or your driving instructor :-)) have a misunderstanding what "makes" a oneway road.
A "real" oneway road needs to have signs on both ends: sign 267 at the one, sign 220-20 at the other end (which is missing here). If only sign 267 exists, it is "only" prohibited to enter the road from that direction, but you are allowed to drive in both directions within the road - it does not matter if there are parking lots or driveways. It is even allowed to turn around without legal problems.

oneway:bus=no already exists on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31288034/.
Broken Butler (2025-03-06 14:44:09+00:00): but if that's the case, shouldn't it then be tagged on turn restrictions instead of a whole the road section?
aixbrick (2025-03-06 16:26:03+00:00): Sure, that is possible. As stated in the wiki there are 3 possible taggings, all with more or less advantages or disadvantages. At the end it is a matter of taste which to chose.
Broken Butler (2025-03-06 16:29:46+00:00): well I'd argue that turn restrictions are better as it's the most accurate since the road itself isn't oneway, just no entry from the south.
Piskvor (2025-03-06 15:47:32+00:00): Dobrý den, díky za doplnění mapy. Dovolil jsem si poopravit označení stanovišť v mapě - "operator" značí provozovatele. Viz např. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12640660405
micheleOSM3 (2025-03-07 20:00:28+00:00): Hi, I don't understand this change, I see that this trail now has some missing parts: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4782828#map=12/46.5814/13.1731
PPete2 (2025-03-07 20:32:53+00:00): Please have a look at the mentioned note. The reason of the change is, that the hiking routes are nowadays on the path were the note-marker points to - not on the path south-west of it. I'm sorry I forgot to check the routes after the change. Now they should be correct again
micheleOSM3 (2025-03-07 21:17:33+00:00): Many thanks!
tastrax (2025-03-08 02:50:55+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
ScottyThePilko (2025-03-08 04:34:27+00:00): Hi there, thanks for your comment. I'll go back and fix them asap unless someone else gets there first
Pink Duck (2025-03-06 15:59:28+00:00): The Aldeby village sign doesn’t have the text ‘Village Sign’ on it, so why did you change the name tag to that?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-03-23 10:16:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163979213 where the changeset comment is: Following on from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163963906 , and see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/about-mapping-features-with-computer-vision/127790 - reverting some 'AI detected swimming pools', some of dubious quality.
NeisBot (2025-03-06 17:39:14+00:00): Hi Chardcoe01, and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear, difficult to understand, or consistently repetitive.

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment
NeisReview (2025-03-08 08:17:54+00:00): I would be glad if you continue contributing to OSM, but please consider adding a description of your changes in the changeset comment.
Luzandro (2025-03-06 12:45:21+00:00): the downgrading of Hauptstraße to residential and upgrading of Hintere Ortsstraße to tertiary seems strange to me
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163283334
optimistic9 (2025-03-07 17:08:12+00:00): Hi Luzandro,
Thank you for connecting with us. I would like to provide further insights regarding these changes. The downgrading and upgrading of road classes result from the permanent closure of the railway crossing at coordinates XY 48.0828099, 16.4447289. This closure has been officially confirmed by the Himberg municipality's website: https://www.himberg.gv.at/aktuelle-information-der-oebb-zur-sperre-der-eisenbahnkreuzung-in-der-bahnstrasse/  and corroborated by TomTom proprietary GPS traces recorded between March 1, 2025, and March 6, 2025.
Luzandro (2025-03-07 17:56:11+00:00): Yes, I'm aware of the closure of the railway crossing. This justifies the downgrading of Rauchenwarther Straße and Bahnstraße, but doesn't explain the switch from Hauptstraße to Hintere Ortsstraße

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31438075

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1212052506
optimistic9 (2025-03-11 18:45:09+00:00): Hi Luzandro,
Thank you for your feedback. I have reverted the highway classification to its previous state and updated the construction tags. The changes were initially made due to traffic disruptions caused by the district heating network expansion. This construction activity, affecting Main Street (Hauptstraße, from Schulallee to the intersection with Münchendorferstraße), was confirmed by the official website of the Himberg municipality:
https://www.himberg.gv.at/verkehrsbeeintraechtigung-durch-fernwaermenetzausbau-hauptstrasse/
Luzandro (2025-03-12 12:49:10+00:00): ah, I see. Thanks for the info
silversurfer83 (2025-03-06 21:55:11+00:00): Hallo Astrid :)

du hast hier eine Bushaltestelle um einige hundert Meter durch die Stadt geschoben. Das passiert leider sehr schnell, wenn man in dem Editor den Ausschnitt verschieben möchte. Ich guck mal, dass ich den wieder zurückschiebe.

Grüße nach Melsungen 
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163283597
Astrid71 (2025-03-07 12:46:09+00:00): Hallo Silversurfer83,
oh, das tut mir total leid :(. Das habe ich gar nicht gemerkt. Ich wäre dir sehr dankbar, wenn du das wieder korrigieren könntest. Herzlichen Dank und ein schönes Wochenende!
eggie (2025-03-06 15:49:58+00:00): Dag Grasmaa1er   Svp geen wegen verwijderen uit OSM
Je kunt wel de juuste accesstags invullen. Bv access=private.
MVG
eggie
Andrew Chadwick (2025-03-06 15:17:50+00:00): Ah yes. Thanks for that!
InsertUser (2025-03-07 23:02:04+00:00): This seems to suggest that there is a basement in a building suspiciously close to sea level. Is this maybe a typo or something that could be better suited to a level:ref tag?
Himké (2025-03-08 18:34:42+00:00): The level value has been corrected to follow zero-based floor numbering.
Andrea Del Sarto (2025-03-13 16:13:13+00:00): Ciao Giovanni,

il percorso relativo alla tappa Z26 del Sentiero Italia è già stata inserita, come il percorso 400; quindi ti chiedo di eliminare questa relazione

grazie e cordiali saluti
Andrea
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 00:09:08+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164656299
Yog Sot (2025-03-06 20:59:25+00:00): tak, masz rację, tam jest sławna podwójna infra, że rower o zgrozo może jechać po pasie jezdni oraz po chodniku! zrobiłem zmianę, możesz looknąć.  No i te wyspy jak zwykle mają brak w oznakowaniu poziomym... A tu w krótkim odcinku protopadłym do tego: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356779224 to juz tak znaki genialnie postawili, że jest dziura na samym środku drogi, nie mam na to siły ;]
NeisBot (2025-03-06 12:48:38+00:00): Hi mws21313, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 91% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 12 highway(s)
- 1 building(s)
- 14 natural(s)
- 1 waterway(s)
- 1 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163284052
woodpeck (2025-03-06 12:58:07+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163284326 - mws21313, if you perform a large-scale deletion like that, you need to give reasons that explain why the deletion was warranted.
309_308_307 (2025-03-06 16:27:43+00:00): Hallo, so wie von dir angedacht funktionieren Abbiegebeschränkungen nicht. Von welcher Straße in welche Straße ist Abbiegen nicht erlaubt?
DanCat42 (2025-03-06 17:02:19+00:00): Von der Adenauerallee kommend darf man nur links auf die Oberhöchstadter Straße abbiegen (blauer Pfeil). Rechts abbiegen ist verboten und dieses Verbot wurde vorher in der Navigation nicht berücksichtig.
309_308_307 (2025-03-06 17:29:40+00:00): Hallo, die Änderung klingt plausibel und ist jetzt korrekt umgesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18789328
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-07 06:34:19+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164618153
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 11:10:44+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/702933232/history has via_ferrata_scale = B that was added in this edit
What via_ferrata_scale = B means? It is not listed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:via%20ferrata%20scale
PPete2 (2025-12-18 16:02:29+00:00): correct, "2" has been ment, thank you!
Piskvor (2025-03-06 12:52:20+00:00): Issue discovered from 
https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator-reports/%C4%8Cesko%20(Czechia%20-%20Czechy):%20Severov%C3%BDchod%20(Northeast,%20P%C3%B3%C5%82nocno-wschodni).html#should%20use%20a%20secondary%20wikipedia%20tag%20-%20linking%20from%20wikipedia%20tag%20to%20a%20human
309_308_307 (2025-03-06 16:28:34+00:00): Hallo, du hast hier die Abbiegebeschränkung ziemlich kaputt gemacht, deshalb meine Frage: du wolltest das Wenden von Westen kommend wieder zurück nach Westen erlauben, richtig?
DanCat42 (2025-03-06 17:08:04+00:00): Hallo, 
ja, wenn man von Westen kommt kann man an der Ampel links abbiegen (geradeaus weiter nach Osten auf die Homburger Landstraße ist verboten) und dann entweder links Richtung "An den Drei Hasen" oder scharf links zurück auf die Nassauser Landstraße Richtung Westen. Dieses war in den Kartendaten vorher nicht erlaubt, so dass beim Routing nach Süden auf die Homburger Landstraße und dann ein eigentlich verbotener U-Turn vorgeschlagen wurde.
309_308_307 (2025-03-07 15:41:08+00:00): Hallo, danke für die Rückmeldung, aber an dieser Kreuzung steht, oder stand ein ausdrückliches Schild "Wendeverbot" (sieht man z. B. noch auf Street View). Steht das da nicht mehr?
DanCat42 (2025-03-07 17:39:57+00:00): Ich habe "U-Turn" erlaubt von einem Kollegen so gesagt bekommen. Auf Google Street View sehe ich das Schild jetzt auch. Ich frage nochmal nach und bitte um ein aktuelles Foto, falls es nicht mehr dort ist.
spiregrain (2025-03-06 14:32:05+00:00): Hi there - you've added a duplicate.   Check out https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12640798033 (yours)   vs https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1322039123 (added June 2011)
spiregrain (2025-03-07 12:57:37+00:00): I've now merged them.
Zatigem (2025-03-07 04:26:10+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre contribution.
Pouvez vous cependant publier un changement à chaque zone modifié plutot que de mettre des changements sur deux villes completement à l'autre bout de la France? Cela évite de remplir l'historique pour rien.
Bonne journée
waielbi (2025-03-07 05:50:28+00:00): Bonjour, oui j'ai suivi les liens reçu depuis le flux RSS d'osmose. Du coup je l'ai ai pris les uns après les autres. Certains traités directement dans osmose d'autres dans id. Ça doit être dans osmose que j'ai validé des changements des villes différentes... 
Cordialement ylb
Syl (2025-03-06 13:26:08+00:00): Bonjour, ce ne serait pas le même centre de lavage séparé en plusieurs bâtiments plutôt que 3 centres différents côte à côté ?
sudo_man (2025-03-11 12:45:54+00:00): les 3 postes de nettoyage possèdent des stations de paiement différentes. C'est surement le même opérateur, même si rien ne laisse le supposer sur place
Syl (2025-03-12 09:07:49+00:00): Ok merci pour les précisions, je laisse comme ça.
JeroenHoek (2025-03-06 13:39:40+00:00): Aan een highway=cycleway hoef je geen bicycle=yes toe te voegen; dat is impliciet al zo:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway

Is er een tool die dit voorstelde?
eggie (2025-03-06 15:36:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Jakka (2025-03-06 15:42:01+00:00): de naamgeving 	"name=Hoofdingang" is fout is een definitie deze wordt ondersteund door de code entrance=main
NeisReview (2025-03-06 17:53:46+00:00): #NoTags

Hi, welcome to OSM.

I've reviewed your latest map edits and it seems that this changeset you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
NeisRevert (2025-03-21 20:24:05+00:00): #hotosm
s777n (2025-03-10 10:45:44+00:00): Здравствуйте. Не нужно добавлять вымышленные объекты. Исправлено
JeroenHoek (2025-03-06 15:11:42+00:00): Had je het commentaar op je vorige wijziging niet gezien? Je hoeft geen bicycle=yes toe te voegen aan een highway=cycleway.
HoiErik (2025-03-06 15:50:08+00:00): Ik had het commentaar inderdaad nog niet gezien. excuus. Ik ben een aantal routes aan het aanmaken met de ORS tool in qgis. Deze tool ziet de paden niet als fietsoptie. in een forum zag ik de optie om het op OSM aan te passen.
eggie (2025-03-06 15:53:29+00:00): Erik..

Hier de gebruikelijke tagging voor fietspaden in Nederland
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway
MVG
eggie
VictorIE (2025-04-28 18:51:04+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12640901534/

I'm changing shop=hardware to craft=stonemason
Russ McD (2025-08-23 16:29:24+00:00): Carusiocled - did u really mean to turn this abandoned railway line, into a farm access track ??
Russ McD (2025-08-23 16:31:22+00:00): Or a farmland boundary - not sure what the intention is here but it doesn't look right !
opendcc (2025-04-02 19:19:30+00:00): großteils reverted
@luskaz (2025-03-06 23:43:01+00:00): Qual a fonte para a nominação das ruas?
user_9848150 (2025-03-06 23:56:59+00:00): geoportal
Marcos Dione (2026-04-07 17:29:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1365015233

if this a bench or...? why highway=emergency_access_point ? maybe it's a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dassembly_point? Still, must be mapped as a point.
Lejun (2025-03-07 08:09:20+00:00): Salut et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap ! Je me permets de faire un petit commentaire sachant que c’est ta première modification (et dans un coin que je fréquente rarement). Tu confirmes que le chocolatier a pris la place de la pharmacie et est pas à côté ? Ça permet un meilleur suivi de l’historique des points. Si ça te dérange pas alors il faudrait que tu apportes quelques corrections :
- Terrasse en été -> outdoor_seating=yes suffit généralement. Surtout avec le contexte climatique.
- Vas y doucement sur les addr, le numéro et la rue suffisent.
- L’attribut phone nécessite généralement le format international, donc avec le préfixe +33 chez nous, et les chiffres deux par deux.
- Oublie pas supprimer les anciens attributs si c’est bien l’ancienne pharmacie. Le chocolat c’est un bon remède, mais pas au point d’avoir une référence FINESS.
Je jetterai un coup d’œil sur tes autres modifications si tu veux. Hésite pas si t’as besoin d’aide, on est pas beaucoup dans le coin. Tu trouveras aussi plein d’informations utiles sur le wiki. Bonne journée !
pavvv (2025-03-06 14:55:19+00:00): w sensie że już od dawna nie powinno go tu być, choć tag sam w sobie jest jak najbardziej użyteczny

po prostu zapomniano go usunąć w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109101013
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 02:05:39+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164657773
opendcc (2025-04-02 13:14:35+00:00): reverted, but keep intermediate changes
pippo6 (2025-03-06 20:13:03+00:00): Ciao, name=* si usa per il nome proprio, non per descrivere l'oggetto.

Hello, name=* is for the proper name, not for a description.
pippo6 (2025-03-06 20:15:09+00:00): Hallo, name=* meint "wie heißt das" (meint nicht eine Beschreibung "was für ein Objekt ist das")
AndreaDp271 (2025-03-07 09:17:30+00:00): they should ban you...
b-jazz (2025-03-12 23:23:02+00:00): The lines that define Fairways and Greens should never intersect or partially overlap each other. If there is a fringe around the green that is similar to the fairway, the fairway should extend around the green and the two objects should be merged together into a multipolygon (See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon for how to create    
them with your map editor). If there is no obvious fringe, the fairway should butt up against the green and every node between them should be shared. Please read the wiki for visual examples an instructions on how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any            
questions, please reply here and I'll gladly help clarify things. Thanks!
eggie (2025-03-06 15:41:52+00:00): Welkom bij OSM...
shop=ice_cream ?

MVG
eggie
Glassman (2025-03-06 20:28:47+00:00): Those signs indicate that the road is privately owned and maintained. The correct tag would be ownership=private. Unless there is a no trespassing sign, the access=private should not be  used. access=destination might be appropriate. Can you review this edit? Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163289956
Syl (2025-03-06 22:44:55+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez enlevé les feux pour les voitures, il n'y en a plus ?
Yunan973 (2025-03-10 18:32:40+00:00): Bonjour,

je ne les ai pas supprimés, j'ai fusionné les noeuds 8919946531 et 685756010 : quand un passage piéton est directement lié aux feux de signalisation, il n'est pas nécessaire de les séparer, un seul noeud suffit.
D'autant qu'ici le passage piéton était erroné : s'il y a des feux, le passage piéton ne peut pas avoir crossing=uncontrolled qui signifie qu'il n'y a pas de feux. Et s'il y a un bouton, il sert pour le passage piéton pas pour les voitures.

Cordialement
Syl (2025-03-11 05:48:10+00:00): Bonjour, j'avais remarqué la fusion avec la disparition du tag highway=traffic_signals, c'est pour ça que je parlais de suppression.
Je n'ai pas trouvé sur le wiki d'endroit où il est dit que les feux piétons et voitures doivent être fusionnés, j'ai seulement trouvé que c'est optionnel de les séparer et que les deux façons de faire sont valides.  Pouvez-vous me donner un lien pour me confirmer qu'il faut les fusionner ?
Je suis au courant pour le problème des passages marqués comme uncontrolled par erreur, cela vient d'une seule personne qui a fait ça dans plusieurs villes. J'essaie de les corriger au fur et à mesure que je les rencontre.
Bonne journée.
Syl (2025-03-12 10:08:04+00:00): En attendant de continuer la discussion sur les feux, je viens d'annuler vos modifications sur la Pépinière République après vérification sur place. Même si le SIRET est fermé le commerce existe toujours.
Syl (2025-03-14 22:03:42+00:00): Bonjour, je viens finalement d'annuler la suppression du feu voiture.
Yunan973 (2025-03-15 18:46:05+00:00): Mettre 2 points à 3 mètres l'un de l'autre (quand dans la réalité le feux est à 30 ou 40 cm du passage piéton) me parait excessif (raison pour laquelle quasiment personne ne le fait puisque qu'un seul noeud suffit pour fournir la même information).

Mais le problème réel était que le noeud pour le feu (que j'ai supprimé) n'était pas sur la rue, cf la version 15 du chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33630650/history, qui n'avait que 3 points, les 2 extrémités et le passage piéton, alors qu'un point highway=traffic_signal doit obligatoirement être sur une voirie.

Mais ce que vous avez corrigé est maintenant correct donc plus de souci pour moi.