piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jrachi (2026-04-02 10:04:09+00:00): Ciao. 
Vedo che hai tolto il tipo di route.
A rigor di logica una relazione dovrebbe specificare se è escursionista, ciclistica, per cavalli, ecc. ecc.
La mancanza è fastidiosa!

Ivo
granpasso811 (2026-04-03 07:19:36+00:00): Ciao,
sì, il punto è che a questo "percorso", peraltro con un "buco", non corrisponde un segnavia ufficiale FIE o CAI come gli altri presenti nella zona. Se ciascuno di noi si mettesse a creare relazioni concatenando pezzi di sentiero senza segnavia, le mappe con segnavia, visibili su waymarked trails o similari diventerebbero illeggibili. Ho preferito non cancellare la relazione ma non mi pare abbia i requisiti per essere definito "percorso escursionistico", altrimenti qualsiasi concatenazione di sentieri più o meno casuale lo sarebbe. Ciao
Jrachi (2026-04-03 10:34:31+00:00): Capisco.
Piuttosto che chiedere all'autore  se si poteva correggere il buco,  hai preferito togliere un tag in modo da essere una relazione senza attributi.
A mio parere se una relazione di tipo route esiste va messo un qualche route=* altrimenti è pura spazzatura.

Ivo
granpasso811 (2026-04-03 11:47:19+00:00): La questione non è il "buco", è creare una relazione a cui non corrisponde un segnavia sul terreno. Chiunque può inventarne a decine di relazioni in quel modo ma non sono utili a nessuno. Quelle che creo o aggiorno, le ho rilevate personalmente o mi sono arrivate dalla FIE. Guarda ad es. una delle ultime che ho inserite: Gattorna -Uscio, segnavia e rilievo GPS ricevuti dal volontario FIE che ha effettuato la segnatura. Ciao
Jrachi (2026-04-03 13:18:51+00:00): Capisco cosa intendi ma non hai ancora spiegato cosa significa togliere il tag route=hiking

Se non esiste sul terreno e non è citata da nessun catasto regionale o comunale, ma è solo una creazione "ad personam" andrebbe cancellata la relazione e non aggiungere errori di mappatura.
Sei sicuro che non esiste?
Avvisa il creatore e cancellala.
Ivo
Snorlax20 (2025-11-15 14:15:15+00:00): Correction on source: NSUL Nov 2025.
bxl-forever (2025-11-15 21:29:25+00:00): Hello,

Can you please have a second at this edit?

amenity=Binnenspeeltuin is a non-existing tag.  Tags must be written in English.

+ The address should be entirely erased because it duplicates the existing address of the area + the phone number is invalid and should use the "+32" international format instead of local "0" prefix.

I suggest opting for either leisure=playground or amenity=schoolyard as the main tag here.

Thanks.
Joe_Koba (2025-11-15 21:57:56+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for the feedback.

- Tag: I added "amenity=binnenspeeltuin" since osmand (the app I'm working in for adding POI's) proposed several other Dutch tags, and "indoor playground" is not available. But point taken, and I think "leisure=playground" is the most adequate. Changed.

- Address: I do not understand what you mean by "it duplicates the existing address of the area", but I have erased the address anyway as requested.

- Phone number: this is the number noted on their website, strange that it would be invalid. But I have edited the format with the international prefix.
bxl-forever (2025-11-15 22:42:54+00:00): Thanks for your next edit, which is a good fix.  About phone number, yes the convention in OSM is that all phone numbers use the international format, so that they will work on every phone and from everywhere.
Jordi MF (2025-11-16 19:32:01+00:00): Please, do not use descriptive names. It is not allowed by OpenStreetMap rules (consult wiki).
Seandebasti (2025-11-17 06:25:26+00:00): Thanks, I now, I will fix that later, I was on the hike, and couldn’t do it during the hike perfectly.
Sorry
mcliquid (2025-11-18 13:51:59+00:00): Hi, die Vorwahl 0171 gehört doch zu einer Mobilfunknummer, wieso findest du hier phone statt mobile besser? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12963886442
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13275629900
Kululu (2025-11-18 19:35:08+00:00): Ich hatte mich dabei an https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/should-mobile-cell-phone-numbers-be-tagged-in-phone-or-mobile/137724 orientiert. Das ist natürlich nicht repräsentativ, aber ich fand die Argumente nachvollziehbar und denke auch, dass „phone” zuerst gefüllt werden sollte. Du würdest das wieder ändern?
mcliquid (2025-11-18 19:41:06+00:00): Danke für den Link! Die Argumente haben mir sehr geholfen, dann lassen wir es so :)
NeisBot (2025-11-16 11:46:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for contributing.

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly.

In total, I detected 24 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category/crossing):
- https://osm.org/way/983796215 , crossings=15
- https://osm.org/way/1132624505 , crossings=6

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

If you’re unsure how to fix them, feel free to ask.

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174687955
NeisRevert (2025-11-19 09:06:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/174849089
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
kre777 (2025-11-25 08:03:52+00:00): Hallo Hutz32
Dein Änderungssatz ergibt Seltsames:
Der Dürrngraben verläuft 'zickzack'.
Ein Gebäude mit Namen "Hausverwaltung"? Wohl kaum.
Der Pfad zwischen Auweg 14 & Rupertusstraße 12 erscheint skurril.
savsk (2025-11-17 01:45:36+00:00): I recommend using "footway=sidewalk" only for the pavements going along with roads, rest of them would not classify as "sidewalks".
Vinny's Workshop (2025-11-17 01:58:45+00:00): Okay, I'll change some of them back.
LySioS (2025-11-15 19:10:17+00:00): Bonjour,
bienvenu(e) sur OpenStreetMap, merci pour les améliorations !
NeisBot (2025-11-16 11:46:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for contributing.

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly.

In total, I detected 149 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category/crossing):
- https://osm.org/way/1034923708 , crossings=86
- https://osm.org/way/1155071884 , crossings=61

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

If you’re unsure how to fix them, feel free to ask.

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174689818
DD1GJ (2025-11-17 11:41:35+00:00): Teilrevert 174689818, Weg 1155071884 wieder hergestellt Bitte Relation: Bus 876: Flensburg => Eggebek (19840674) prüfen, Ebenso Schützenkuhle und Friesische Straße sicherheitshalber nochmal anschauen.
FinnAwes (2025-11-17 21:46:04+00:00): Thanks @DD1GJ
Relation: Bus 876: Flensburg => Eggebek seems to be fine:
https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=19840674&_noCache=on#
https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/relation.php?id=19840674&lang=en
eggie (2025-11-27 18:42:42+00:00): Dag Jasper,

Schuiven met de kaart geedt vaak schade als je onbedoeld een node selecteert en dan gaat schuiven in editmodus. Dan schuift niet de kaart maar de node met alles wat er aan vastzit.

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=174690648

Het is ontertussen weer hersteld.
MVG
eggie
FajrAl (2026-07-27 04:55:44+00:00): I don't think an Ayam Geprek food stall accept a crypto payment. Questionable PoI...
Rockedf (2026-07-27 12:59:32+00:00): Hello, thank you for pointing out whether or not they accept Bitcoin at the business; at one time they did. You can see the request to add them to the map here: 

https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-data/issues/4746

If you are from the area and can check with the business owners as of today, even better.

I will email the business owners to verify. 

Thank you very much
FajrAl (2026-07-28 01:04:19+00:00): Thanks! 

I couldn't verify on the ground, but it's just an anomaly to have a crypto payment for a small business. I was making sure it's not some kind of SEO spam...
Rockedf (2026-07-30 13:09:34+00:00): It is always good to double-check the information.

It is not strange nowadays for small businesses to accept Bitcoin as a way to escape inflation and greedy government laws. 

Bitcoin is freedom! 

Have a nice day
Cucazer (2025-11-16 19:41:56+00:00): Hi, could you draw the outline of this solar station (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:generator:source%3Dsolar), at least an approximate one?
Руслан Мамедов (2025-11-16 20:11:41+00:00): openstreetmap.org/changeset/174743837
NVBW_Seifert (2025-12-30 11:42:01+00:00): Hallo,
warum hast Du das Haus vor dem bahnsteig mit building=bakehouse gesetzt?
Der Wert ist nur für historische Backhäuser gedacht, siehe 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building=bakehouse

Ist dort im Gebäude eine Bäckerei vorhanden?
Wenn ja, dann bitte einen Knonten mit shop=bakery und ggfs. Namen und Details ergänzen.
Die Nutzung des Gebäudes bitte ändern
Moepmoep (2026-01-02 08:19:07+00:00): In dem bzw. das Gebäude ist eine Backstube ohne Ladenverkauf.  Man sieht die Küchengerätschaften durch die Fenster.

Das hat mich zwar auch gewundert, weil an Bahnhöfen normalerweise auch ein Laden ist, aber so ist es.  Es gab auch keinerlei Anzeichen, daß ein Ladengeschäft noch in Einrichtung wäre.  Das könnte man vielleicht in einem halben Jahr nochmal prüfen.
Moepmoep (2026-01-02 08:20:21+00:00): (Soweit ich mit erinnere steht "Backhaus" dran.)
Moepmoep (2026-01-06 16:51:27+00:00): So, letztens nochmal dort gewesen:  Das ist aausgeschildert als die Vereinsbackstube eines Backvereins.  Was es alles gibt ... Es ist nun offensichtlich, daß dort nichts verkauft werden wird.
Dawid2849 (2025-11-15 17:30:33+00:00): Dziękuję za sprawdzenie tego miejsca i zmapowanie!
Paweł_M (2025-11-16 17:48:45+00:00): Nie ma problemu. Miałem je po drodze jak zbierałem hydranty, więc uznałem, że zobaczę jak to wygląda. Swoją drogą całkiem ciekawe miejsce
Dawid2849 (2025-11-16 18:04:56+00:00): W takim razie muszę sobie zapisać miejsce na przyszły sezon rowerowy :)
Paweł_M (2025-11-17 19:50:17+00:00): Polecam suchy dzień na wycieczkę. Te prowizoryczne schodki są z płytek 25x25 albo 30x30 i jest tam dość stromo. Mnie po drodze złapał deszcz, płytki były pokryte liśćmi, a prowizoryczna "poręcz" zrobiona z pniaków drzew jest tylko na części schodów. Także musiałem schodzić dość ostrożnie aby się nie poślizgnąć :D
Zrop (2025-11-15 17:36:37+00:00): Hallo 42dp,
bei Michael Lakämper handelt es sich nicht um ein Finanzamt sondern um einen Steuerberater.

Gruß
Zrop
user_23410287 (2025-11-15 18:30:28+00:00): Korrigiert; - gerne dürfen Sie hier jederzeit Details auch sebstständig aktualisieren.
NeisBot (2025-11-16 11:46:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for contributing.

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly.

In total, I detected 86 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category/crossing):
- https://osm.org/way/252278061 , crossings=7
- https://osm.org/way/252278063 , crossings=3
- https://osm.org/way/269950576 , crossings=69

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

If you’re unsure how to fix them, feel free to ask.

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174692151
SekeRob (2026-05-28 15:07:05+00:00): Hi dp7,

In case you've not noticed, there's a mapper by name of minamo doing the rounds and deleting objects left right and center as was done here to include deleting scrub zones and then making it part of wood. If you have Better OSM org as an add on to ID in your web browser the visualization of what he all deleted in in this CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182275974#map=16/43.47364/13.11696 and then who over writes that with small sections of landuse where it cant be square enough and leaving inter area gaps. At any rate this action happened about 15 days ago. I notified the @DWG but they seem to be to busy for this, so finally today took it upon myself to restore as much as possible as it was, needing some hands-on because of those partial over writes. My restore work is in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183309749. Added some loose trees and tows and other small landcover bits while there. Let me know if something was missed and I'll get on it. Undeleting is real easy in JOSM, just needs some applied method not to cause conflict

Happy mapping
SekeRob

PS his first run-in with upset mappers was in 2016 resulting in 2 blocks, then went utterly zedro mapping and then starting 3-4 weeks ago in Northern Italy working his way down and now running havoc in the greater area of Terdizio. His neis page shows where. https://hdyc.neis-one.org/user/minamo So far CS comments and PM gave zero response, same as to all the comments back in 2016 to include comments by woodpeck repair.
dp7 (2026-05-28 15:17:03+00:00): Hi SekeRob,

Thank you so much for your detailed investigation and for taking the time to restore the data in changeset 183309749. I really appreciate your efforts.

To be honest, I had also noticed some strange behaviour from this mapper (minamo) a while ago, but I didn't have the time to look into it properly at that moment, and then unfortunately I forgot about it. So I'm genuinely grateful that you did the careful checks and cleanup that I should have done.

Given the pattern of deletions and problematic edits you've described — and the fact that he has ignored both changeset comments and direct messages — do you think it would make sense to simply revert all of his harmful edits outright, while waiting for the DWG to step in and block him? Or would that cause more conflicts because of the partial overwrites you mentioned?

I'm happy to help if needed, but it sounds like you already have a good handle on the situation. Thanks again for your vigilance and for fixing so much already.

Best regards,
dp7
george1201 (2025-11-15 22:50:27+00:00): Hier hatte ich surface=tartan vor über 3 Jahren eingetragen. Seitdem wurde der Platz offensichtlich erneuert. Kannst du bestätigen, dass der Belag des Spielfelds weiterhin richtig ist? Wenn nein, dann surface bitte löschen.
Moepmoep (2025-11-16 16:10:54+00:00): Nein, ich kann mich nicht mehr erinnern.  Das sah nicht anders aus als der große Platz.  Ich lösche es mal.
george1201 (2025-11-16 16:31:03+00:00): Tartan ist es jetzt wohl nicht mehr, dafür müsste es eine andere Farbe haben (rotbraun). Deswegen löschen. Besser eine fehlende Eigenschaft als eine falsche.
eggie (2025-11-15 17:51:13+00:00): Dag Chris,

Geef het via onderstaande site door aan het Kadaster anders komt de schuur met de zelfde vaart weer terug bij herimport.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Korhoenlaan+14+hoogeveen&objectId=0118100000247738&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=230342.0765&geometry.y=526290.088&zoomlevel=15&bijbehorendeAdressen=Pand

MVG
eggie
Chris Hooijer (2025-11-15 23:27:01+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

Dank, zal ik doen!

Mvg, Chris
Dimitar155 (2025-11-15 20:39:40+00:00): Данните за улиците в Уикиданни подлежат на обновяване, което вече е направено.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-17 00:50:54+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18965
mueschel (2025-11-17 11:51:00+00:00): Hi,
what do these tags mean?
date_of =09-30
date_on =06-01
If there is temporary closure, the common tagging is using conditional access tags.
MicheleExplorer (2025-11-17 15:18:38+00:00): Hello, the road is open to pedestrians and residents (including with cars) all year round.
For vehicles (non-residents), passage is prohibited from June 1st to September 30th.
mueschel (2025-11-17 15:36:55+00:00): Thanks for the explanation! This can be tagged easily:

Does "vehicles" include bicycles?
If yes:
vehicle:conditional= destination @ (Jun 01 - Sep 30)

If no:
motor_vehicle:conditional= destination @ (Jun 01 - Sep 30)

There are no further access tags needed.
MicheleExplorer (2025-11-18 07:44:10+00:00): Hi, bicycles are allowed. Thanks so much for the suggestions. I'll copy this string [
motor_vehicle:conditional= destination @ (Jun 01 - Sep 30)] and insert it into the labels.
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-15 20:30:02+00:00): Looking at the Esri aerial imagery, this appears to be in the middle of a lawn a lot further than is typical for ALPRs. Do you have a picture I might use to improve the location?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174695511
Agent K01 (2025-11-15 20:45:25+00:00): Sorry, I don't really know how to operate the map. It's right next to the shoulder of 60 hwy facing east/northeast.
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-18 16:15:29+00:00): Looks like from west to east, what I'm seeing on the shoulder are a lamp post, route signs, a yield sign and another lamp post.  Where is this camera relative to those?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174695511
Agent K01 (2025-11-18 16:26:15+00:00): It is on it's own pole in-between the route sign and yield sign.
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-18 21:24:07+00:00): Got it, pretty sure I got it <2-3 meters of accurate based off the description.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174695511
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-15 20:29:36+00:00): Looking at the Esri aerial imagery, this appears to be in a diagonal parking space. Do you have a picture I might use to improve the location?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174695534
Agent K01 (2025-11-15 21:50:37+00:00): If you zoom in a little bit,  you can see the shadow of the pole where it's mounted. I've been trying to figure out how to change the location of all three to be closer to where they are.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174695534
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-18 16:13:27+00:00): I moved it using the Id editor to the pole WSW of the original location.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174695534
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-15 20:29:16+00:00): Looking at the Esri aerial imagery, this appears to be in a diagonal parking space.  Do you have a picture I might use to improve the location?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174695557
Langlaeufer (2026-01-29 20:41:48+00:00): Hallo Katalysator.
da münden einige Weg in den nun demolierten Radweg ein. Sind diese mit der Fahrbahn verbunden?
Was meinst du mit demoliert? sollte es nicht eher razed sein?
Katalysator (2026-01-29 20:56:31+00:00): Hallo Langlaeufer, ich kannte bisher nur 'demolished:*' und ich bin nach lesen des Wikis unsicher, ob nun demolished oder razed besser wäre. Jedenfalls ist der vorher direkt an der K5 verlaufende Weg komplett weg-gebaggert. Ich weiß aber nicht, wie der Rad-/Fußweg nach Ende aller Bauarbeiten aussehen wird. Und die Satellitenfotos zeigen noch den Stand vor der Baustelle. Daher habe ich den Weg nicht komplett gelöscht.
eggie (2025-11-15 17:33:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-11-15 17:40:42+00:00): Probeer bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode.
eggie (2025-11-15 17:48:18+00:00): Tip.. Je kunt met editor iD eigenlijk geen routerelaties aanpassen. Dat kan wel met josm.
Editor iD maakt de relaties meestal stuk. 
Ik heb het iets aangepast.
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2025-11-15 17:37:00+00:00): Dag Bramba  Hoe kan nu een adres zomaar veranderen?
Beter is het om op het oude adres de adresnode van de bedrijfsinfo te ontdoen en op de nieuwe locatie de info weer toe te voegen op de nieuwe adresnode. Nu lijkt een adres verdwenen.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=174696350

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-11-15 17:39:05+00:00): adres hersteld. Info samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode
b-jazz (2025-11-16 01:24:00+00:00): Hey there atomic,

Can you explain what is going on with the green at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1279807753 ? It is overlapping a pond that shows up in several different aerial imagery, none of which I have access to that shows a green is there. 

Your green also overlaps with a bunker, which shouldn't happen. Something is either a green or a bunker, it can't be both. Therefore, the area of those shouldn't overlap. 

But the bigger question is why the green is overlapping the pond. If you have accurate imagery that we don't, please make sure the pond gets updated as well as the green/bunker overlap. 

Thanks
eggie (2025-11-15 20:35:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
bartgron (2025-11-15 20:12:15+00:00): Fajna budowa stacji paliw na pół miasta xD
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-15 20:13:03+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19842059

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-11-16 16:39:01+00:00): już myślałem, że teren budowy przez przypadek na pół miasta dałem xd
bartgron (2025-11-17 12:19:48+00:00): No nie, ty po prostu błędnie opisałeś zestaw zmian (opis powinien zawierać to co się faktycznie zrobiło)
Barroszt (2025-11-17 22:19:36+00:00): Może nie błędnie, tylko niekompletnie jak już się tak czepiamy :), ale i tak dzięki
Nieh rzyją kąpletne opisy zmian
Barroszt (2025-11-17 22:19:59+00:00): Niech żyją kompletne opisy zmian
kamilbogacki (2025-11-19 19:56:56+00:00): Jak modyfikujesz coś i changeset wywali na pół Polski to wpisz komentarz co się stało
Hufkratzer (2025-11-16 20:56:24+00:00): Hi,
du hast hier 3 Reitanlagen gemappt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1450914764,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1212391973 und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1212391974
Die liegen alle dicht beisammen und gehören vermutlich zusammen. Kann man die zu einem Multipolygon zusammenfügen? Wenn die in WIrkkichkeit alle zu einer Reitanlage gehören, dann widerspricht es der "Ein Objekt, ein OSM-Element"-Regel wenn man dafür 3 getrennte Reitanlagen mappt.
bigbug21 (2025-11-16 21:03:07+00:00): Hallo Hufkratzer,
es ist immer wieder spannend zu sehen, welch vielfältige Mitarbeiter OSM hat.
Kurzum: Die drei Reitanlagen sind, soweit ich das als Laie sagen kann, Koppeln die zur Pferdeklinik Stephansmühle gehören. Dazwischen verlaufen verschiedene öffentliche Wege. Hilft das?
Hufkratzer (2025-11-16 22:01:41+00:00): Ja. Koppeln sind keine Reitanlagen (vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding). Ich habe die beiden östlichen mal so umgetaggt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174747542), wie das in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Riding für Koppeln angegeben ist: landuse=meadow + meadow=pasture. Für die kleinere von den Flächen wäre evtl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse=animal_keeping besser geeignet (Paddocks?).

Die westliche Reitanlage habe ich mal so gelassen, denn ich vermute, dass das da dieser Reitverein ist: https://www.reitclub-stephansmuehle.de/anfahrt; auf dem Luftbild meine ich darin einen großen und einen kleinen runden Reitplatz erkennen zu können.

Kannst es ja verbessern wenn du dich da auskennst.
bigbug21 (2025-12-26 21:25:12+00:00): Vielen Dank, Hufkratzer!
tbo47 (2025-11-15 17:37:28+00:00): https://www.senenews.com/actualites/serigne-mountakha-mbacke-serigne-babacar-sy-plusieurs-rues-de-dakar-plateau-rebaptisees_561384.html
grzegorz75jan (2025-11-16 18:50:13+00:00): Ta droga to nie unclassified tylko residential a by było ciekawiej to łączyłeś ją z drogą https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/729709010 którą dodałeś w 2019 r.
Na podstawie czego faktycznie dodałeś drogę w tej edycji bo niby napisałeś na podstawie Binga na którym widać mniej niż z geoportalu.
W Polsce Bingiem to się co najwyżej wspomagamy a nie traktujemy jako podstawę do edycji.
Porównaj sobie obydwa podkłady foto.
Dlaczego droga po lewej jest krzywa i przypięta do landuse https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7182548732
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174697416