piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisRevert (2026-02-07 07:49:02+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178216965
(No visible changes after review)
km2bp (2026-01-30 12:43:51+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap. Dzięki że poświęcasz swój czas aby udoskonalać mapę. Rób to najlepiej jak potrafisz. Bowiem diabeł zawsze tkwi w szczegółach. Np. takich jak numer telefonu zawsze z prefiksem kraju aby bezpośrednio z mobilnych aplikacji nawigacyjnych można było  dzwonić do obiektu jednym kliknięciem nawet w trybie bez Internetu.  Nim więcej danych kontaktowych i linków do spcjalmediów tym lepiej zwłaszcza gdy jesteś właścicielem obiektu. Już poprawiłem  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/383089911/history#map=19/51.909268/15.575795 Pozdrawiam!
eggie (2026-01-29 16:33:56+00:00): Dag Koerier,

Je kunt helaas geen rourelaties bewerken met editor iD. dat is een routekiller.

Het kan wel met editor JOSM en de nodige ervaring.


editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047


Dus als je serieus met relaties aan de gang wil dan zul je moeten overschakelen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-29 16:37:17+00:00): Drie OV routes hersteld
eggie (2026-01-29 16:42:47+00:00): Wellicht heb je hier nog iets aan
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.88905,4.486636,19/?datastrip=20260118_PNEO-04
DeKoerier (2026-01-29 16:46:16+00:00): > Drie OV routes hersteld
Bedankt.

> Wellicht heb je hier nog iets aan
Ja, ik ben ermee bekend, ook lokaal.
de24000 (2026-02-12 12:32:03+00:00): Merhaba. Demiryolu saydings ve yard hat isim yazıyorsunuz. İsimler sadece ana hat için geçerlidir.
eerib (2026-01-29 18:02:20+00:00): Hello cwms16,

Thank you for your edit. Unfortunately it does not meet OpenStreetMap standards. Please refer to the following wiki page.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

If you have further questions regarding the policies or trail mapping in general then I recommend starting a discussion thread on the OpenStreetMap Community Forum.

https://community.openstreetmap.org

If you would like to dispute this revert of your edit then you can reach out to the Data Working Group, the moderation group of OpenStreetMap by sending an email to the following email address.

data@openstreetmap.org

Thank you, eerib
cwms16 (2026-01-29 18:24:53+00:00): unfortunately you are ruining this for our students. This revert should also not be listed as 'vandalism', this was merely constructive.
eerib (2026-01-29 19:10:03+00:00): Hello cwms16,

Be mindful that the trail entrance and exit are plainly visible in satellite imagery.

https://imgur.com/a/YkqUeZs

Yari na, eerib
cwms16 (2026-01-29 19:21:41+00:00): Potentially - I will go review this by foot instead of from a computer.
cwms16 (2026-02-07 17:11:41+00:00): Hello eerib - I went for a walk and this is merely a game path in the forest. Please remove. The satellite imagery is correct and looks like BC Hydro access to their towers. For proper 'ground truthing' you should actually be on the ground, not tracing random Strava heatmaps from. Thank you.
eerib (2026-02-07 18:41:54+00:00): Hello cwms16,

If you would like to dispute this revert of your edit then you can reach out to the Data Working Group, the moderation group of OpenStreetMap, by sending an email to the following email address.

data@openstreetmap.org

In your email I recommend including:

- Your Crown Lands File Number for the orienteering tenure in this specific location.
- Associated tenure paperwork showcasing your tenure in this specific location.
- A GPX file of your recent activity in this area.
- An explanation for why single track trails in this area are plainly visible in satellite imagery and why they are materially different than BC Hydro's access roads.
- An explanation for why the Strava Heatmap shows dirt bike activities along the trail.
- Any photos that you believe may help support your dispute.

Cheers, eerib
trial (2026-01-30 22:24:55+00:00): Merci d'annuler immédiatement cet acte de vandalisme.
DD1GJ (2026-01-29 22:47:37+00:00): Revert. Löschung rückgängig gemacht.

Hallo, das Thema mit den Hydranten und KRITIS wurde schon vor Jahren diskutiert. Der BDEW brauchte zu später Stunde ein Beispiel für kritische Infrastruktur und irgendjemand hat Hydrant gesagt, damit er endlich heimgehen konnte.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/schreiben-des-bdew-bundesverband-der-energie-und-wasserwirtschaft-e-v/79797/53 

Viele Grüße, Joachim
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:04:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/relation/20150002 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Balangan beach"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-08 09:27:52+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/177883873
eggie (2026-01-29 18:18:41+00:00): Dag Tom..
Meestal zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van oneway=yes
Is dat het geval..toevoegen
..oneway:bicycle=no
En evt ook voor mofa en moped.
Mvg
eggie
BromBrom (2026-01-29 19:14:07+00:00): Dag Eddie,
Bedankt voor je hulp! Ik heb het aangepast.
Mvg,
Tom
eggie (2026-01-29 19:21:15+00:00): 👍
Rainero (2026-03-17 19:16:34+00:00): Revert mit changeset/180024969
(unzulässige Quelle)
eggie (2026-01-29 18:14:55+00:00): Dag Paul.. Je vraagt feedback.
Evt aanvullen met de specificatie...
..construction=residential (of wat het ook mag zijn)
Mvg
eggie
rezemika (2026-02-04 16:38:22+00:00): Bonjour,
Tout d'abord, bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap ! Et félicitations pour votre premier changeset. :)

Je me permets de vous faire un petit retour dessus du coup.

- Les segments de trottoirs que vous avez ajoutés sont découpés en plusieurs morceaux. Ce n'est pas bien grave, mais il est possible de faire plus simple : quand vous utilisez l'outil "ligne" dans l'éditeur, vous pouvez cliquer plusieurs fois pour dessiner chacun des points de la ligne, sans avoir à faire des segments séparés à chaque fois. Non seulement ça fait gagner du temps, mais ça permet aussi d'appliquer les mêmes attributs à l'ensemble de la ligne. Si c'est un même objet, qui a les mêmes propriétés d'un bout à l'autre, alors vous pouvez en faire un seul objet. Faire des lignes séparées est surtout pertinent quand ce sont des objets distincts, comme les trottoirs de deux rues différentes qui se croisent.

- À savoir que dans l'éditeur, vous pouvez fusionner deux segments de lignes (tant qu'elles sont contiguës et ont des attributs identiques) en sélectionnant les deux avec la touche Maj et en faisant clic droit -> "+" pour les fusionner. Vous pouvez essayer sur ces trottoirs si vous voulez (sinon je peux le faire si vous préférez).

- Aussi c'est du pinaillage, mais près de la maison du tourisme au bord de l'Erdre, l’extrémité du trottoir n'est pas reliée à la route. C'est une bonne pratique de relier les éléments joignables entre-eux, pour que les moteurs de création d'itinéraires comprennent qu'un piéton qui viendrait du bord de l'Erdre peut passer de la route au trottoir à cet endroit.

Bref, c'est juste des petits détails mais ça facilite la vie. N'hésitez pas si vous avez des questions ! :)
rezemika (2026-02-06 22:34:58+00:00): (j'ai fais la modif du coup)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-27 11:27:14+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and other mistagging for Lucid Private Offices POI in changeset 184690669

https://osm.org/changeset/184690669
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-31 23:56:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1472433974 czemu sądzisz że " ← Rachinek-Cyprianka →" to nazwa tej drogi?
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-29 22:12:50+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13510047559

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:04:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13469192432 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Toy store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-08 09:27:53+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178257620
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:04:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/8394099259 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tailor shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-08 09:27:53+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/177889649
tux67 (2026-01-30 09:41:53+00:00): Ich hab' mich mal selber verbessert und bei diesen beiden Nodes ein aktuelleres Tagging vorgenommen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177881528
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177858877
Taya_S (2026-02-01 18:51:56+00:00): Hello,

Please cease attempting to fix this import in Greenland. It was undiscussed and will be reverted.

Also, in the future, please make sure the import you are attempting to fix was actually discussed by the community. Your involvement has made reverting everything significantly more complex.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder,
On behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
OliveraM (2026-02-02 06:25:10+00:00): Hi Taya_S, 
reply is already on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177887381, so we can have one discussion on this issue.
Best regards,
OliveraM
k2101 (2026-01-31 06:21:51+00:00): Cześć,
zmieniłem ten odcinek drogi z highway=construction na proposed, bo droga nie jest jeszcze w budowie i czeka na wniosek o ZRID. Szczegóły co do łącznika są tu
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4970572
dmjab13 (2026-01-29 23:13:38+00:00): please do not submit changesets that span an area this large
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:04:54+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13510092849 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "InmobiliariaIntialized corrected to 
Inmobiliaria office"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Oficina de Inmobiliaria corregida a Oficina Inmobiliaria"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-08 09:27:53+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178257621
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:04:57+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1472445368 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "hotel facilities"
---
Misalnya, versi teks yang lebih netral dan faktual bisa jadi: "fasilitas hotel"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
FajrAl (2026-01-30 13:16:59+00:00): Halo, selamat datang di OpenStreetMap. Untuk tutorial cara edit yang benar, bisa Anda lihat melalui youtube "Tutorial Openstreetmap" atau saat di editor website-nya, bisa tekan tombol H, nanti ada tutorial interaktifnya dengan tulisan "Memulai Perjalanan."
silversurfer83 (2026-01-29 19:15:13+00:00): Hi :)

du trägst gerade Burgen in DE ein. Da würde mich a) interessieren, woher die Information stammt und b) wäre es super, wenn du dich im Wiki mal umschaust und die Burgen korrekter erfasst. Ich bin mir nämlich sicher, dass hier am Backofen keine Burg mehr zu sehen ist. Daher ist historic=castle unter Garantie nicht korrekt, oder? Vielleicht sind wir hier mit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:archaeological_site%3Dfortification besser bedient.

Aber bitte beantworte mir mal die Fragen a)

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177860243
Janek78 (2026-01-30 20:16:46+00:00): Mahlzeit

Die Burgen die ich eintrage habe ich selbst besucht, wie man auf wehrbauten.de nachschauen kann. Ich trage kein "Fantasieburgen oder sonstige unplausiblen Sachen ein. Was die Burg am Backofen angeht, so handelt es sich um eine Wallburg wo die Wälle und Gräben schön zu sehen sind.
silversurfer83 (2026-01-30 20:21:20+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung :)

in diesen Fällen wäre die Quellenangabe beim Abspeichern dann "survey". Die Wikipedia ist aus lizenzrechtlichen Gründen leider keine für OSM geeignete Quelle. Diese bitte nur als Inspiration für Reisen nutzen und dann vor Ort gucken, was noch vorhanden ist.

Wenn du die Wikiartikel, die verlinkt sind, gelesen hast und der Meinung bist, dass dein tagging passt, dann lass es erstmal so. Ich halte die Burg am Backofen jedoch für so stark verfallen, dass es eher eine archaeological_site=* ist.

Allzeit gute Reise
silversurfer83
Janek78 (2026-01-31 07:52:56+00:00): Morgen

Gelobe Besserung. Muss mich da mehr reinlesen was das angeht, Bin nicht so PC affin
silversurfer83 (2026-02-01 20:00:11+00:00): Kein Problem :)

OSM ist nicht gerade das was ich trivial nennen würde. Stück für Stück arbeiten wir uns in unsere jeweiligen Themen ein. Und dass ich diese Burg noch nicht drin hatte, wurmt mich ehrlich gesagt auch ein bisserl ;)
Frans S (2026-02-01 15:03:07+00:00): A new mapper. Welcome.
Your work is reviewed by a global validator.
In general. Precise mapped.
Some errors made. 
Never connect nodes of buildings to other features.
Why add layers to a building? Avoid errors? This is not a solution.. Just adjust the mapping of the building or road.
And, square each rectangular building, please.
Fraxi (2026-01-29 19:52:14+00:00): Добре си направил, явно съм пропуснал пътеката... Долу също има, има и стълби към магазините и помещенията отдолу.
Между другото, мисля, че до https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10248594582, като бях, видях някакъв надпис/табела "бул. "Симеоновско шосе"1". Не 9. Затова май оставих бележка.
rhhs (2026-01-29 20:12:12+00:00): Yes, and on the west side of the building there are paths at 2 levels too. I can't remember exactly where they are though, need to go there with a laptop to draw them :) бул. "Симеоновско шосе" 1 is the address of Villa Victoria restaurant in Loven Park, so it can't be here.
Fraxi (2026-01-29 20:14:13+00:00): Знам, ама имаше такъв надпис. Преди малко гледах и кадастъра.
Fraxi (2026-01-29 20:14:27+00:00): Както и да е.
Fraxi (2026-01-29 20:28:49+00:00): С риск да наспамя, ако ходиш пак и искаш, виж какво пише на табелката до прозореца от лявата страна срещу източните стълби :P
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=42.6573496778&lng=23.3377433103&z=17&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&pKey=867894950435727&focus=photo&x=0.510694161214438&y=0.5230267037594086&zoom=0
rhhs (2026-01-30 16:10:28+00:00): Continues here https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5148456
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:03:07+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 20 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1472459281 v1 | 20 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177861532
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:03:07+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 26 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/9097803 v6 | 17 crossings
https://osm.org/way/9102987 v2 | 9 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/67220578 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177861696
NeisReview (2026-02-07 07:49:03+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177993874
trial (2026-01-31 20:01:28+00:00): Pourquoi avoir cassé la forêt ? Je regarde l'imagerie aérienne et je vois bien un bois.
trial (2026-01-31 20:11:13+00:00): Côté operator : autant rester sur une clé voulant plus dire quelque chose (public) et de préciser l'opérator :
operator:wikidata=Q23782161
trial (2026-01-31 20:23:33+00:00): Le parc ne comporte pas ce bois, aussi des clairières : il devrait avoir sa propre géométrie. Voir les parcelles correspondantes dans la couche Cadastre.
limes11 (2026-05-23 20:55:03+00:00): Hallo, 

du hast die Kratzenburger Landstraße auf surface=gravel geändert, sie war zuvor mit asphalt erfasst, was auch zum Luftbild passt. Zudem access=destination, auch der service-tag passt überhaupt nicht. 

Kannst Du das bitte noch einmal prüfen ? Vielleicht meintest du eine kleine Nebenzufahrt ?

Viele Grüße
th3m4zzini (2026-05-23 21:04:53+00:00): Hallo,

vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich meinte auch die Nebenzufahrt. Die Kratzenburger Landstraße ist natürlich Asphaltiert und der Service Tag ist natürlich auch so nicht richtig.

Danke für den Hinweis!
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-30 01:11:49+00:00): so https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8400890927/history was entirely not existing?

but how you know that from aerial imagery?
ricaestevao (2026-01-31 18:58:04+00:00): The node 8400890927, version 3, previously mapped as "Sensor-Tec Comercial Ltda", was verified locally. The store is no longer operating at that location — the building is now occupied by another tool shop and an oil change service. This change was not inferred from aerial imagery alone, but confirmed by on-the-ground observation and local knowledge. Therefore, the original business was removed to reflect the current situation.
ricaestevao (2026-01-31 18:59:40+00:00): (PT-BR):

O ponto 8400890927, anteriormente mapeado como "Sensor-Tec Comercial Ltda", não existe mais nesse local. A loja foi substituída por outro comércio — atualmente funcionam ali uma loja de ferramentas e uma oficina de troca de óleo. Essa atualização não foi feita apenas com base em imagens aéreas, mas confirmada por observação local. Por isso, o nó original foi removido para refletir a situação atual.
Mrdrache333 (2026-01-29 19:15:38+00:00): Bei Navigation von Accum kommend über die Brücke, wurde wenige Meter vor der Autobahnüberführung vor Jahren durch eine Baustelle auf 50kmH begrenzt. Leider zeigte die Navigation bis heute diese falsche Geschwindigkeit an.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-29 22:33:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13483974517

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-29 22:43:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13483974517

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
sheldonelectric (2026-02-01 22:23:07+00:00): I copied the address from the receipt, and i crosscheck now that it is correct.
YomanNH (2026-02-07 21:43:55+00:00): Skoro na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437786881 ustawiłeś access=yes, to wskaż mi którędy mogę tu przyjechać samochodem i korzystać np. z tego parkingu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159025264, z którego usunąłeś access=no.
𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ (2026-02-08 14:18:11+00:00): Kolejny raz tłumaczę - Parking jest ogólnodostępny, ale nie ma dojazdu. Tu nie chodzi o dojazd, tylko raczej o to, czy można przebywać na danym obiektcie. Można tu chodzić, ale dojechać autem bez przepustki się już nie da (czasami w lato był autobus do tego miejsca).
𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ (2026-02-08 14:18:30+00:00): access=yes jest tu uzasadnione.
YomanNH (2026-02-08 14:31:35+00:00): Skoro nie ma dojazdu, to nie da się z niego korzystać i nie jest ogólnodostępny. To, że można chodzić - ok, jasne, jest dostęp od innej strony, poprzez leśne ścieżki, którymi można chodzić. Znasz podstawy mapowania dostępów? Wygląda na to, że nie bardzo...

Z parkingu nie da się legalnie korzystać => access=no.

Do dróg nie da się legalnie dojechać pojazdami silnikowymi (na jedynej drodze dojazdowej jest zakaz ruchu) => co najmniej motor_vehicle=no.

Jak zostanie wymyślona możliwość teleportowania się, wtedy Twoje rozumowanie będzie miało sens. Obecnie nie ma. Chyba, że jest jakaś niezmapowana droga dojazdowa, pozwalająca na dojazd do tego obszaru i implikująca access=yes?
𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ (2026-02-08 15:02:28+00:00): Dojazd do miejsca ≠ Możliwość korzystania z miejsca.
YomanNH (2026-02-08 16:53:42+00:00): To wyjaśnij mi, jak mogę korzystać z tego parkingu i tych dróg samochodem, skoro uważasz, że jest tam access=yes.
George Sears (2026-02-16 19:15:22+00:00): Ciao Adim, leggendo la wiki penso che forse amenity=recycling + recycling_type=centre andrebbe meglio, visto che nella pagina di waste_transfer_station parla di  processazione di rifiuti, che non vengono poi riciclati
eggie (2026-01-29 20:49:18+00:00): Hoi,

Dit lijkt me oke.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-29 20:47:35+00:00): Hoi,
Wanneer er gebouwd wordt en dat is niet het geval Dan tag je landuse=construction
construction=residential. name= Starterswoningen gebruiken we niet.
Dat hoort niet op een kaart.
Maar er wordt niet gebouwd. Het is een plan en plannen zetten we niet in OSM.
Ik heb het plan verwijderd.
Mee eens?

MVG
eggie
Paul10k (2026-01-30 09:35:27+00:00): Akkoord en alle begrip hiervoor. Ik woon hier om de hoek, dus zie vanzelf wanneer de bouw daadwerkelijk start.
eggie (2026-01-30 09:39:11+00:00): Oke.. op het moment dat ze gaan bouwen vraag je een import aan van de woningen. Dat kan via het forum van osm middels het draadje BAG importverzoeken.
Mapse en maak wat van je wijkje..
eggie
Paul10k (2026-01-30 09:42:19+00:00): Wow, wat zijn er veel mogelijkheden! 
Ik hou het in de gaten.