piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
vmicho (2026-04-21 12:53:27+00:00): Hi.
Why did yo ufusion these 2 ways again?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/587643501

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1263640788

They were laboriously separated to represent what they should, and now they are again touching? Any reason?
orycteropus1 (2026-04-21 14:45:56+00:00): Kann sein, dass ich da etwas geändert habe, ist schon eine Weile her.

Ich sehe dein Problem nicht... die beiden Gebiete grenzen doch aneinander, da ist nichts dazwischen? Was ist daran falsch?
vmicho (2026-06-15 21:00:49+00:00): these 2 ways:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/587643501
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/587643501
orycteropus1 (2026-06-16 07:06:43+00:00): Ich weiss, welche Flächen du meinst. Die Fläche Health grenzt an Farmland. Darüber liegt eine Strasse. Was ist an meiner Änderung nicht korrekt? Ein Aussparen von Strasse zwischen zwei Flächen ist imho bei einer Vektorkarte falsch. Dazu kommt, dass es fast unmöglich ist, so genau zu mappen, dass die Abstände korrekt sind.
olo81 (2025-12-13 23:59:26+00:00): Błędne tagowanie prędkości 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:source:maxspeed?uselang=pl
C2oc4 (2026-02-26 15:36:58+00:00): Dzień dobry. Poprawiono zgodnie z wiki. Proszę o sprawdzenie.
olo81 (2026-02-28 00:56:44+00:00): Według streetview tam nie jest teren zabudowany. Jeśli nie zmieniono oznakowania, to dalej jest źle.
Roydon Olive (2025-12-10 12:08:10+00:00): I think the layer tags were correct before so I undid this.
BCNorwich (2025-12-10 12:41:25+00:00): Hi, we are talking about layer tags here. layer tags are relative only to what feature they are above or below. They have no relation to the levels of a building. The service roads are only above a highway tagged as layer=-1, therefore, they must be layer=0. The layer=0 tag is not usually needed as it is implied in it's absence. 

Regards Bernard.
Roydon Olive (2025-12-12 05:54:54+00:00): Thanks for the additional information about how layer tags work.

So in this case we have roads that are below ground level, roads that are above them and also above ground level, and then roads outside of that area that are at ground level. Saying that these roads on top are layer 0, the same as the roads next to them that are lower at ground level feels weird. Is there a better way to tag it?
BCNorwich (2025-12-15 07:22:33+00:00): Hi, Sorry for being late answering.
The layer tag is not meant to show what feature might be at a higher or lower elevation. It's purpose is merely to show the relationship between two crossing features, which is above or below. Thus, there is no need for the layer tag to attempt to show relevant elevation. A bridge over another highway is layer 1, the lower highway has no layer tag as layer=9 is implied in it's absence. Any tunnel feature would be a negative layer, thus a culvert under a road is layer -1, the road is implied to be layer=0. 

Maybe the wiki page can give more insight than I can explain, it's here:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer

Regards Bernard.
Frans S (2026-01-15 10:19:11+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Why just draw a rectangle when you see that the buildings are more complex? A number are identical, so you can copy/paste them. The imagery is so good that it is easy to follow the rooflines.
Please take that into consideration on the next mappings.
Best regards.
NeisBot (2025-12-14 07:55:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Gabinet trychologiczny w Łodzi"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego opisu mogłaby brzmieć: "Gabinet psychologiczny w Łodzi"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-14 14:19:21+00:00): ❌ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175775915

Thanks, bartgon.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-10 09:21:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/309912745

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ieguy3 (2025-12-10 09:18:17+00:00): its a small median because people keep dying. they still go over the line.
Friendly_Ghost (2025-12-17 18:32:53+00:00): Hi there. Please, please stop arbitrarily grouping landuse areas. This serves no purpose and it makes the areas impossible to work with. On top of that the slim sections around greenfields are plainly wrong. 

I'm also sending you this message privately in case you miss this.
limes11 (2025-12-22 10:31:22+00:00): Moin, 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457427371

hattest du ohne highway-Wert erfasst. Ich habe ihm ein hw=path spendiert.

Im Luftbild ist davon nicht viel zu sehen. Führt der E1 hier tatsächlich so wie von dir eingezeichnet ?

Viele Grüße
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-23 08:21:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-12-10 14:02:59+00:00): Merhaba. Uydu görüntülerinden anlaşıldığı kadarıyla bu alanda birden çok bina bulunuyor. Binaları silip, yeniden building=* etiketiyle tek bina şeklinde eklemeniz(changeset/175749343) maalesef doğru değil. building=* etiketi binaları temsil ediyor. Sitenin alanını eklemek için, alanı çizerek bu alana landuse=residential etiketi eklemek daha uygun olacaktır. Bu nedenle değişikliğinizi geri aldım.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175761231
ieguy3 (2025-12-10 09:28:33+00:00): im pretty sure i got all the road split. honestly its not a good median. its effectively a 4 inch median with bollards on top. that won't stop a car traveling at 60. Sorry for spamming but it took a while to fix some things along ramona expressway
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-23 08:21:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-23 08:21:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-23 08:21:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856
Allison P (2025-12-10 20:56:36+00:00): This is a shared driveway, not a residential road. The houses are addressed off Wright. I have corrected the classification.
santoshipanwar_lyft (2025-12-16 04:33:12+00:00): Hi Allison P,

My name is Santoshi, and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you so much for paying attention & fixing my mistake! Agree with you that these roads are shared driveways.
Please accept my apologies & I’ll be more cautious when pushing changesets up.

Regards,
Santoshi
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-23 08:21:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-23 08:21:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856
YomanNH (2025-12-10 12:54:04+00:00): Z jakiego źródła korzystałeś podczas dodawania tu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457445845 i na kilku innych drogach bicycle=designated i foot=designated?
Adam Haba (2025-12-10 15:40:35+00:00): Z "Geoportal 2: Ortofotomapa (najnowsze zdjęcia lotnicze) (WMTS)", bo zauważyłem, że jest tutaj zarówno ścieżka dla pieszych jak i dla rowerów.
YomanNH (2025-12-10 15:52:48+00:00): Tak to jest, jak się mapuje nie znając zupełnie terenu... Nie ma tam żadnego znaku, który wskazywałby tam na istnienie ciągu pieszo-rowerowego. Więc wcześniejsze mapowanie było prawidłowe. Sama nawierzchnia częściowo z asfaltu i częściowo z kostki brukowej o niczym nie świadczy. Przywrócisz poprzednie prawidłowe tagi?
Adam Haba (2025-12-10 15:58:13+00:00): A mogłbyś Ty, bo ja nie wiem jak je przywrócić?
YomanNH (2025-12-10 16:08:17+00:00): Możesz skorzystać z tej strony, żeby zobaczyć co i jak zmieniłeś: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175751457
Możesz też po prostu zmienić mapowanie na samo highway=path albo highway=footway.
A jakbyś jednak nie dał rady, to jutro to ogarnę.
YomanNH (2025-12-11 06:49:36+00:00): Naprawiłem. Widzę, że znowu zamiast poprawiać istniejące drogi, to je wywalasz i tworzysz od nowa. Ile razy trzeba Ci powtarzać, żebyś tak nie robił? Już nawet bana za to miałeś.
Adam Haba (2025-12-11 16:54:10+00:00): Tylko że w wielu przypadkach trudno jest je edytować w inny sposób
Adam Haba (2025-12-11 16:55:49+00:00): Albo jeśli nie trudniej to dłużej
YomanNH (2025-12-11 17:00:30+00:00): Nie jest trudno. A jeśli nie masz czasu, to edytuj mniej, ale dobrze, lub znajdź sobie inną rozrywkę.
Huldega (2025-12-11 10:42:55+00:00): Hallo. War es wirklich notwendig, 3 Tage vor dem Fahrplanwechsel meine Änderung zu löschen?
Negjana (2025-12-12 13:39:34+00:00): Die 200 km/h sind falsch, so lange ETCS nicht in Betrieb ist auf der Strecke. Und die Inbetriebnahme ist derzeit nicht absehbar.
ilias_ (2025-12-10 11:48:47+00:00): Bon travail
eggie (2025-12-10 13:09:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-11 00:43:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457451276

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
totera (2025-12-10 13:02:55+00:00): Scusa mfortini, ma tu sai con certezza che Ca' Guercino abbia quel nome in onore del pittore e non per una famiglia omonima? E che Frà Guercino sia sempre il pittore, e non un frate che non c'entra nulla con lui?
mfortini (2025-12-10 13:15:06+00:00): Per prudenza, in quei casi ho revertato. Grazie
dzamper (2025-12-12 11:42:10+00:00): Ale one wszystkie już mają `access=private`. Więc `taxi=no` niewiele zmienia
Manek-40 (2025-12-12 14:12:44+00:00): Używam OSRM do trasowania dla taxi. Drogi prywatne są u mnie dozwolone, więc musiałem zabronić przejazdu w inny sposób.
Dawid2849 (2025-12-12 14:15:03+00:00): Powinieneś to zgłosić do twórców OSRM
HellMap (2025-12-12 11:42:14+00:00): Like the other changeset, what is your source for these speed limits? These are very specific values you added to what is non-public territory. So how did you acquire this data and where can it be verified?
HellMap (2025-12-20 19:17:29+00:00): Sveiki vēlreiz,

Privāti ar Jūsu kolēģi aprunājām par avotiem un autortiesībām, bet priekš OSM šeit ir tik un tā jānorāda avots un licence. Tā kā pagājis jau laiks bez atbildes, tad pagaidām šo izmaiņu atcelšu līdz tiks precizēta OSM pieņemama licence.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-08 23:19:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355445400/history

is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/269083405/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3610551836/history also gone?
NeisBot (2025-12-14 07:55:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Магазин товарів для святкування та підарунків"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
Nikolsson (2025-12-14 08:36:00+00:00): Магазин гелевих кульок та подарунків
NeisReview (2025-12-16 17:26:18+00:00): 🔴 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by https://osm.org/changeset/176016368
uknown-gryphus (2026-02-05 06:48:50+00:00): Hi,

The roads inside a residential complex should be tagged as highway=service + service=driveway, not highway=residential. See prior discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/improving-mapping-of-minor-roads-in-india/107652/3

The wiki also documents this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India/Tags/Highway#Highway_service_roads

Could you please revert the tag to highway=service?
rempshaener (2025-12-10 21:35:15+00:00): Hallo,
bitte colour=red statt "rot",
fire_hydrant:position=in Hecke bitte überarbeiten.
Viele Grüße
habi (2025-12-10 12:09:38+00:00): Ciao Holzwurm
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457455661 heisst mit grosser Sicherheit nicht 'Trail', sondern ist ein solcher, d.h. kann mit `bicycle`-Tags oder so ausgezeichnet werden.
Gruss,
habi
Luzandro (2025-12-11 11:50:18+00:00): Hallo,

es sollte kein sprachspefizifisches "wikipedia:de" ohne allgemeinem "wikipedia" angegeben werden. Generell sollte im Allgemeinen ein einzelner Wikipedia-Eintrag in der Hauptsprache ausreichen, also wikipedia=de:Schönbrunn (Wien)

Only provide, in normal circumstances, a link to a single Wikipedia article, which should be to the article in the primary (local) language for the subject

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:wikipedia
Herzi Pinki (2025-12-11 12:04:08+00:00): Danke, hab's gefixt.
Luzandro (2025-12-11 12:45:15+00:00): der value braucht schon einen "de:"-Prefix
habs entspr. geändert
dzidek23 (2026-03-02 15:58:15+00:00): Hey king carz, 
Firstly, I'm glad to see a taxi company using OSM and actually making some worthwhile contributions. 

As to the edit, I have some objections. Although Apollo Ave. is closed again for traffic it is physically connected to the Peterborough Rd. so we should not break that connection. There are a number of ways we can mark this junction unusable for vehicles while still make it work for cyclists and/or pedestrians. 

I will restore the junction and place some bollards on the entrance to Apollo ave. Hopefully this will be enough to discourage any routing mechanism from taking this path. If this wouldn't be enough for you, we could make some other changes.
Cresma (2025-12-10 11:32:39+00:00): https://cresma.es/
Taya_S (2025-12-10 13:17:31+00:00): Reverted fantasy edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175759215
user_5359 (2025-12-12 11:15:01+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13366796729 (one of one hundred thirty-one objects). What is the mean of the tags 
CODE_ADRES = 00214
ID = 142785
NOM_PADA = RUE ADJABIÉ LÉONIE YAYO
PAYS = CÔTE D'IVOIRE
VILLE = ABIDJAN
Thibault Rommel (2025-12-10 11:47:03+00:00): *update M11
Frans S (2025-12-23 15:55:23+00:00): Hello Arnalie.
Thanks for mapping on this project.
A few remarks. A rectangular building needs only 4 nodes to map. Mostly you used 5. (1 alongside a wall)
You often forgot to square the buildings you mapped. 

Please follow the rooflines more accurately.
Quality prevails above quantity!

Best regards,
gurglypipe (2025-12-10 13:09:32+00:00): Hiya, I see what you’re trying to do here, but I don’t think a pontoon can be described as a building. It doesn’t have walls or a roof.

I think the waterway=pontoon tagging is as valid as waterway=dam.

My suggestion is that either some other tagging needs to be found which describes a pontoon as a structure which is inherently present only on water, or waterwaymap.org needs to be updated to not flag waterway=pontoon for loop errors.
schenklklopfer (2025-12-10 13:31:15+00:00): Well yes, but it is not made of water either.

It is something man_made, no building, but also noting made out of water.
Maybe refer to man_made=pier or man_made=quay?
gurglypipe (2025-12-10 13:38:21+00:00): It’s neither a pier nor a quay, but man_made=pontoon would be appropriate, I think.
gurglypipe (2025-12-11 12:13:44+00:00): I’ve changed it to man_made=pontoon in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175799940
Taya_S (2025-12-10 13:22:10+00:00): OpenStreetMap is not intended to be used to map fantasy project. Please tell your classroom to cease using OpenStreetMap for its dam projects. 

The edits that have been peformed by your group in this area have been destructive as they were of very low quality and did not align with reality.

Furthermore the notes left behind in this area have been nothing but meaningless spam. Notes are intended to give feedback to other mappers about missing or outdated features. They are not intended to be used for classroom projects.
osmviborg (2025-12-10 12:40:38+00:00): Engholmvej er færdig, den åbner om to dage, hvorfor tagger du den som konstruktion?
osmviborg (2025-12-10 12:48:38+00:00): Det stykke som ikke er åbnet kan, hvis det endelig skal være, tagges med 'access=no'
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-03 19:42:46+00:00): Hello!

You used
healthcare=dentistry
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13366883206/history

Have you maybe meant
healthcare=dentist
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-11 00:43:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13366856912
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457475633

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Gregory Peony (2025-12-10 22:57:18+00:00): Hello, the footprints you mapped here represent buildings, though some are oversized. The one I flagged is in fact a reminant of a circular building. 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom in so that you can accurately draw the footprint. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with `shift+(-/+)`, or JOSM with `ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag`.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.
osmviborg (2025-12-10 12:34:48+00:00): Lisbjergbakken er ikke 'tertiary' 'residential' passer bedre
MarinoBM (2026-02-08 21:53:26+00:00): Hola tomcat83, gracias por tus aportaciones a OpenStreetMap.
Para sucesivas ediciones ten en cuenta que por normativa, los nombres no se deben abreviar.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas_en_Espa%C3%B1a#Name_con_abreviaturas
Si tienes alguna duda la puedes plantear en el grupo de Telegram OSM Castilla y León.
https://t.me/osmcyl

Un saludo.
Gregory Peony (2025-12-15 07:48:38+00:00): Thank you for your contribution! 

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners `q`, or circularise them `o`, because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely manually. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the ID Editor, you can `right click` for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size which may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough if you want every corner to be squared. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.

Keep on mapping!
eggie (2025-12-10 13:29:29+00:00): Dag fpww   

Wat bedoel je met leisure=common?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dcommon

Wat tips: 
Svp niet Google als bron gebruiken. Dat is niet toegestaan.
Probeer als het kan op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen. 

Ik heb het voor nu even aangepast naar community_centre.

MVG
eggie
fpww (2025-12-10 20:12:46+00:00): community center lijkt me prima Eggie, wat kan ik anders gebruiken als verificatie van een locatie?

Ik heb eventueel een screenshot van het event wat ik daar ga bijwonen.
eggie (2025-12-10 20:49:48+00:00): We kennen ook de tag events_venue

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:events_venue

Daar zat ik ook aan te denken.
Up to you...
Mvg..
eggie
eggie (2025-12-10 20:51:36+00:00): En dit is wiki van amenity=events_venue

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:events_venue

Groet..
eggie
fpww (2025-12-10 23:23:22+00:00): Hoe stuur ik je een screenshot?
eggie (2025-12-11 09:33:27+00:00): Hoi,

Dat gaat helaas niet via dit platform.
Maar er is een website van 'Vonk'
Je hoeft dus geen foto op te sturen. 

https://vonkindewijk.nl/
De website heb ik toegevoegd aan het adres. 
Dat maakt het wel duidelijk.
Denk dat  amenity=events_venue misschien beter is.
Je zou het zelf kunnen aanpassen. 
Altijd lastig iets te vangen in één tag. 




MVG,
eggie
fpww (2025-12-11 13:35:49+00:00): Fijn Eggie, maar hoe kan ik in het vervolg dan een adres aantonen zonder Google maps?
Ik zat ook te denken aan plaatsen waar je volgens Google maps met de fiets of te voet via kunt reizen, bijvoorbeeld een autoweg zonder ventweg of voet/fiets pad.
eggie (2025-12-11 13:51:42+00:00): In ieder geval niet met Google....
Voor straatkijk bestaat ook mapillary. .. net zoiets. Dat is wel toegestaan.. en verder alles van de overheid. PDOK.. BAG Kadaster.. BGT.
Satelliet dataportaal... en sommige achtergronden waar ik een licentie voor heb. Obliek Slagboom&Peeters.. AHN hoogtebestanden.
Bronnen genoeg.
.. en uiteraard eigen waarneming.



Groet..
eggie
fpww (2025-12-11 13:57:12+00:00): Dankjewel Eggie,
Ik zal nog vaak terugkijken op dit bericht dan.
Google maps vond destijds mijn eigen waarneming niet genoeg.
Toen ben ik ermee gestopt.

Dit alternatief lijkt me ook veel meer de moeite waard om moeite voor te doen dus tot snel 💪😊
eggie (2025-12-11 14:51:03+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.23072299999998&lng=5.187086000000022&z=17&pKey=371376294235221&focus=photo
fpww (2025-12-11 16:37:54+00:00): Ik heb de desktop uploader voor Linux gedownload maar hoe kan ik die nu gebruiken?
Sudo apt install Mapillary enz. werkt ook niet.
eggie (2025-12-11 18:02:06+00:00): Mapillary hoef je niet te installeren. Mijn account had ik al eerder opgezegd toen de policy werd gewijzigd.
Ik gebruik gewoon de algemene website. Op je mobiel werkt t ook... anders een vraagje voor het forum. Daar zitten ook linuxgebruikers.
fpww (2025-12-11 23:46:22+00:00): Okay, het was meer om ook bij te dragen aan deze map maar ik kom er wel achter.
eggie (2025-12-10 13:13:31+00:00): Dag TeamUp.

Het lijkt me niet correct dat name=basket op dit veld staat. (tag voorgaande mapper) 
Ik heb name=basket verwijderd.

MVG
eggie