piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
cubbe8 (2024-03-07 02:18:36+00:00): I just flew out of JFK last week and saw Terminal 2 has been demoed. The roads and construction zone are from Bing Maps Imagery provided on OSM which has been updated very recently.
cubbe8 (2024-03-07 02:19:15+00:00): And the jetways I updated the tags
redd (2025-07-16 15:23:51+00:00): Hallo J-MUC,
ich habe den Briefkasten an dieser Stelle neben den Rolltreppen nicht gefunden. 

Hattest du die Öffnungszeiten vor Ort erfasst und kannst helfen den genauen Ort zu ermitteln?

Grüße,

Redd
maro21 (2024-03-09 02:48:42+00:00): Pomysł z przeniesieniem tagów [wikipedia] i [wikidata] na obszar mostu jest w porządku.

A jeśli chodzi o nazwy mostów. To nie jest tak, że oficjalna nazwa mostu XY to "most XY" (pisany małą literą). W uchwałach jest zawarta tylko nazwa samego mostu. Uchwały nie określają pisowni nazwy rodzajowej mostów (alej, placów itd. też nie). W uchwałach jest tak: "Mostowi na rzece Odrze zlokalizowanemu w takim a takim miejscu, nadaje się nazwę XY."
A Wrocławski Geoportal nie stanowi źródła prawa.

Na tabliczkach jest różnie, tak czasami Most wielką, a czasami most małą literą. Ale nie można oczekiwać od pracowników ZDiUM, żeby znali zasady pisowni. Można od nich oczekiwać, żeby nie było dziur w jezdni i żeby znaki stały przy drodze.
Dla mnie ważna jest konsekwencja. Robimy mapę i piszmy konsekwentnie małą literą.
pavvv (2024-03-09 21:46:00+00:00): skoro tak bardzo zależy ci na konsekwencji to dlaczego nie zmienisz pisowni wszystkich placy, alei, przejść, zaułków, mostów?
maro21 (2024-03-30 00:04:35+00:00): Mam to na liście rzeczy do zrobienia na OSM. Jednak ta lista jest ogromna. Z placami i alejami jest trudniej, bo do tego dochodzą jeszcze adresy. Z mostami i innymi miejscami bezadresowymi jest łatwiej. Pisałem już 2 lata temu na forum o tym, że planuję zmienić na małą literę, nie było sprzeciwów, więc kiedyś to zrobię. Na razie zmieniłem wybrzeża i bulwary, ty zmieniłeś mosty i place.
Leo Slager (2024-03-02 22:03:31+00:00): Dag IEditTheMaps,
Door de vervoermaatschappij wordt deze halte toch echt geschreven als Fortuynplein.
En zo staat het ook op het haltebord.
Terwijl de gemeente Fortijnplein op het straatbord zet.
Ik zal eens navraag doen wat de juiste spelling is.
Leo Slager (2024-03-04 16:35:42+00:00): wijziging van de naam was dus niet juist. Straatnaam en halte-naam verschillen dus van elkaar.
IEditTheMaps (2024-03-04 16:51:04+00:00): Bedankt voor het controleren en excuses. Ik had ook in de buslijn relations de naam en de bestemmingen aangepast. Moeten die ook terugveranderd? Zo ja, wie van ons doet dat?
Leo Slager (2024-03-04 18:10:04+00:00): Ik zal een revert uitvoeren, dat is het makkelijkste.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-30 15:04:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1220567668 - jaki sens ma dodawanie house=residential ?
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-05-16 17:16:20+00:00): Hi, please don't change bicycle-pedestrian paths to footways. More information on mapping cycling infrastructure:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-cycleways-in-estonia/104894
user_12500175 (2024-03-16 08:39:00+00:00): Hallo, du hast einen power=switch eingetragen, das wäre dann soetwas
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:power=switch
user_12500175 (2024-03-16 11:03:53+00:00): Ich habs schon mal korrigiert
user_12500175 (2024-03-16 14:53:03+00:00): Hab den Namen entfernt, und als Fläche angelegt. Zutrittsbeschränkungen werden mit dem access-Tag angegeben:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
dypa (2024-03-03 19:31:46+00:00): При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra

Пожалуйста при внесении следующих правок используйте теги (Размеченный (нерегулируемый) пешеходный переход)
crossing=uncontrolled
crossing:markings=zebra

так же прошу вас проверить, является ли точка https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11685083109 регулируемы пешеходным переходом (есть светофор для пешеходов). заранее спасибо!
mueschel (2024-03-18 19:19:12+00:00): Hi,
you used the tag "in:service=yes" here - what does it mean? It's not used in any other place.
habi (2024-03-05 20:26:11+00:00): Ciao Mail Taus
I think it would have been *much* better to have mapped the lantern path as a relation [1] on already existing paths.
Then it would also have been possible to add the seasonal opening times and a website.

Now it's mapped as mostly duplicated and overlapping ways, which is not ideal.

Do you want to try again and/or should I help you to get there?

Greetings from Bern,
habi

[1]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation
habi (2024-03-05 20:27:28+00:00): Additionally, `fee=yes` and `charge=0` on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8258647611 contradict each other.
And there's a typo in the French name :)
Mali Taus (2024-03-06 19:11:14+00:00): Hey Habi, greetings from Valais. If you could fix it for me? I'm not very good with OSM direct editing but happy to contribute through my much used Organic Maps app, "Add Place to OSM".
Mali Taus (2024-03-06 19:12:30+00:00): And French is not my native language, lol!
habi (2024-03-07 15:36:27+00:00): I've removed most of your duplicately mapped way in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148348111 and added already present ways to the new Lantern path relation at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17318292

Happy mapping!

BTW: I'm from the German speaking part of Switzerland and stumbled over these changes here because of your notes here in the vicinity. My French is also not so good :)
Mali Taus (2024-03-07 19:44:35+00:00): You're a champion, thank you. I'm still learning OSM but travel a lot and do a lot of adding of things for non-locals like water, benches, viewpoints, etc.
aTarom (2024-03-02 18:38:49+00:00): Hola, bienvenid@, gracias por participar, qué quieres introducir en el mapa exactamente? la ermita está mapeada correctamente y no es un parque. Corrijo los errores y si quieres puedes participar en los canales de la comunidad donde podemos ayudarte con los primeros pasos en:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/lang-ca/69
Saludos
mcliquid (2024-03-05 08:57:51+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
MxxCon (2024-03-07 01:44:02+00:00): Hello.
Should this be the building's name? This sounds more like a description of it rather than a proper name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148140533
gscholz (2024-03-09 06:50:28+00:00): Hi Lucas Marques,
your recent changesets have left behind several errors regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=36.08078&lat=47.23392&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148140576

Can you please fix this?

Btw. you can avoid uploading such errors by using the internal validator of JOSM.

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2024-03-13 06:46:12+00:00): Hi Lucas Marques, 
these errors still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-02 17:40:40+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"30-go Stycznia":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11685138363

"Kazimierza Tetmajera":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11685138371

"Kochanowskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11685138382
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11685138383

"Orkana":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391176445

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-03-03 00:51:53+00:00): Poprawione.
Filip009 (2024-03-04 19:57:14+00:00): Again the same question. Why you have added general access=no? Access tags don't need to be mapped separately. They are mapped implicitely https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Worldwide
Filip009 (2024-03-04 19:53:25+00:00): Hello, you have created way with everything what was possible to add. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1256919093
Are you sure that, that way is a cycleway?
Are you sure that there is a sing declaring, that pedestrians, cyclists and horses are allowed to use this road?
Why you have added general access as "no"?
When you have decribed in changeset comment this way as a path, why you did not tag it like path?
For hard visibility I reccomend to use tag trail_visibility https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility
silversurfer83 (2024-03-02 18:50:32+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap Hirrumi :)
thank you for helping keeping The Map up to date.

You have asked for someone to review your changeset. I'll offer some feedback here:

It's totally fine to just add the grassland area. If it doesn't have a name please do not add a name. If you feel you need to leave a note to other mappers or the world you can do so with the note or description tags.

Our wiki has some more details for you
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a

in case of questions don't hesitate to reach out

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148140942
blackboxlogic (2024-03-03 01:43:42+00:00): There's also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge:name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148141016
ConradWard (2024-05-02 23:09:26+00:00): Ooh, thanks for sharing! I will try using that too, I guess for smaller bridges.
maraf24 (2024-03-18 19:40:32+00:00): Oficjalne nazwy są łatwe do sprawdzenia, bo są w TERYT. Nazwa oficjalna to "Most Maślicki", a nie "most Maślicki".
Tu jest jeszcze stara tabliczka więc jest zgodność nazw, ale w końcu i ją wymienią na "most Maślicki" :)
Swoją drogą to ciekawe, że miasto, zamiast zmienić nazwy uchwałą postanowiła stosować na tablicach nazwy inne niż uchwalono.
Ponownie polecam TERYT jako oficjalne źródło nazw oficjalnych.
https://eteryt.stat.gov.pl/eTeryt/rejestr_teryt/udostepnianie_danych/baza_teryt/uzytkownicy_indywidualni/przegladanie/przegladanie.aspx
silversurfer83 (2024-03-02 18:45:03+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap

I have reverted this change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148142682 because it changed this in the parking lot that don't look plausible.
For reference please look at this link:
https://osmcha.org/changesets/148141253

In case of questions please don't hesitate to reach out

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148141253
SomeoneElse (2024-03-02 18:14:23+00:00): Thanks!
mcliquid (2024-03-05 08:57:35+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
gscholz (2024-03-19 07:08:34+00:00): Hi MapeoAlmeria,
this changeset ha created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-1.95126&lat=37.40140&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148141533

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
muchichka_s (2024-03-03 04:14:43+00:00): Нова вулиця в Києві в іншому місці в Жулянах. Вже купу разів писалося
tjum (2024-04-17 09:09:57+00:00): Hallo,

mir ist gerade eben dieser Änderungssatz aufgefallen. NICHTS davon existiert! Bitte ALLES wieder RÜCKGÄNGIG machen!
berndw (2024-04-17 11:08:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150123474
silversurfer83 (2024-03-02 18:32:26+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap :)

you have asked for someone to review this changeset. I'll give some feedback:

It is good practice to produce a good changeset comment including a good source for the information added to the database. You only posted a "/" which doesn't really help. 

Here are some resources to help you with future edits and with getting help in case of questions:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148141784
eggie (2024-03-02 18:35:21+00:00): Dag Robert.
Lexmondplein 267 bestaat niet Het beste kun je zoiets bijtaggen op de BAG adresnode nr 26

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-03-02 18:39:44+00:00): Het adres is ook niet compleet. Meestal wordt bij buitenschoolse opvang childcare gebruikt. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dchildcare

Het adres heb ik verwijderd..  Kijk voor de juiste format naar de adresnode. 
Een adres op de gebouwomtrek hoeft niet.. 

MVG
eggie
CjMalone (2024-03-06 20:14:17+00:00): Looks good to me, thanks
maraf24 (2024-03-23 23:01:52+00:00): W jakim celu usuwasz source:name z obiektów? Ktoś to po coś zostawił.
AjieAboganda (2024-05-22 17:07:20+00:00): 173195571 has [use_sidepath] but is missing parallel footways
Langlaeufer (2024-03-16 10:55:40+00:00): Du hast hier den Radweg in Gehweg mit "Radverkehr frei" geändert.  Hattest du das kürzlich vor Ort überprüft? Falls ja, mache ich meine Änderungen natürlich wieder rückgängig. Hatte nicht gemerkt, dass das erst kürzlich geändert wurde.
maraf24 (2024-03-30 22:47:06+00:00): Na tablicy jest "MOST PĘGOWSKI"
gscholz (2024-03-06 07:16:53+00:00): 

Hi MapeoAlmeria,
your recent edit have (again) left behind several errors regarding duplicate nodes:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-1.98994&lat=37.46082&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148142896

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
arjunaraoc (2024-03-07 09:18:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my improvement: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148330854
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148142914
eggie (2024-03-03 11:24:14+00:00): Dag Ard....    Je vraagr feedback  Lijkt me oke zo.
Op de website is de naam niet consistent. T of t ?

MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse (2024-03-02 18:58:22+00:00): .. and elsewhere other than Acomb.
delineatorix (2024-10-02 02:37:10+00:00): Hallo Niederpruem,
woher hast Du die Adresse/Hausnummer für diese Parkplätze?
Schöne Grüße
delineatorix
Niederpruem (2024-10-03 14:19:41+00:00): Hallo delineatorix,
schaue Dir mal bitte Parkopedia an.
Die beiden Links sind in der jeweiligen Webseite. Hier aber gerne noch mal:
Bernsteinweg Ost
https://www.parkopedia.de/parken/parkplatz/bernsteinweg_ost/18375/prerow/
Bernsteinweg West
https://www.parkopedia.de/parken/parkplatz/bernsteinweg_west/18375/born_a_darss
Obwohl beide Parkplätze nahe zusammen sind, sind es doch zwei verschiedene Städte, da die Grenze genau zwischen diesen beiden Parkplätzen verläuft.
delineatorix (2024-10-03 19:11:09+00:00): Danke für dir Antwort. Jedoch ging’s mir gar nicht um die unterschiedlichen Gemeinden. Woher hast Du die Hausnummern?
Niederpruem (2024-10-05 18:14:30+00:00): Die Hausnummern habe ich von HERE WeGo und TomTom
delineatorix (2024-10-05 22:11:48+00:00): OSM soll nicht dadurch erweitert werden, indem aus anderen Karten abgeschrieben wird. Siehe dazu auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Beginners_Guide_1.1 > Umgang mit urheberrechtlich geschützten Karten

Auch ist es unüblich, das Parkpläze Adressen/Hausnummern zugeordnet sind. Für Adressdaten gibt es frei verfügbare, verlässliche Quellen.
Niederpruem (2024-10-06 09:44:08+00:00): ok, dann lösche die Adresse
delineatorix (2024-10-06 11:49:28+00:00): Bitte trage in Zukunft keine Adressen mehr an Parkplätzen ein und nutze auch keine unzulässigen Karten als Basis. Danke
eggie (2024-03-02 19:57:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
joost schouppe (2024-03-04 08:58:20+00:00): Bart,
Belly is dus niét dicht? Dacht je even dat het wel min of meer permanent gesloten was, en zag je dan dit fout was? Zelfde vraag voor Esprit.
BartHanssens (2024-03-04 11:15:00+00:00): Hallo Joost,

Belly is terug open na enkele weken dicht te zijn geweest voor verbouwingen. Leek dat ze eerst gingen verhuizen naar het gebouw ernaast, maar nu hebben ze zo te zien enkel uitgebreid.

Esprit is iets ingewikkelder: jaren terug was het een Esprit, nadien een soort outlet waar toevallig ook Esprit werd verkocht. Recent enkele weken dicht geweest, en nu toch weer geopend als een "echte" Esprit
joost schouppe (2024-03-04 16:27:44+00:00): OK, super. Bedankt voor de info!
maraf24 (2024-03-02 23:06:56+00:00): Kilka porad:
Nie należy kasować takiego budunku, tylko zmienić go na demolished:building=* i tak zostawić do czasu nowego orto; inaczej ktoś niezorientowany może dodać budynek ponownie.
Warto też dodać landuse=brownfield, szczególnie, że są spore pozostalości, bo budynek nie został w całości wyburzony.
Trzecia rzecz: adres należy wyodrębnić do węzła, a nie usuwać wraz z budynkiem.
DD1GJ (2024-03-10 14:28:52+00:00): Rrevert, neuen Weg gelöscht da bereits vorhanden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1256938343
maro21 (2024-03-09 02:50:54+00:00): Dlaczego usunąłęś relację?
pavvv (2024-03-09 06:40:59+00:00): nie była potrzebna, jeśli most składałby się z kilku man_made=bridge to wtedy mogłaby być
maro21 (2024-03-30 00:08:10+00:00): Na OSM mamy zasadę "Bądź odważny w tym, co dodajesz, ale ostrożny w tym, co usuwasz". https://osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_tags_that_you_don't_understand
https://sproutsschools.com/chesterton-fence-dont-destroy-what-you-dont-understand/
To, że czegoś nie potrzebujesz, nie znaczy, że inni nie potrzebują, więc nie jest to wystarczający powód do usunięcia.
archie (2024-03-02 20:07:05+00:00): Bra val av "cabin"! Ibland ser man fel taggning i sådana fall med "hut", vilket är något helt annat.
quincylvania (2024-03-03 00:49:44+00:00): Hi Mashin 👋
I see you're removing trail names from ways that are already present on trail relations. I fear this is a nonstandard pattern with spotty support. Most maps and routing engines will not show labels for these trails, including the default osm-carto style. As such, I recommend reverting your changes to save future mappers from needing to fill in the missing data again (unless the trails are truly unnamed). Thanks!
Mashin (2024-03-03 15:49:56+00:00): Hi Quincy,
It's a mix of both. There are name tags that are truly descriptive and not an actual name e.g. red trail. The other names are just a duplicate of what is already in the hiking relation and creates just a duplicate when name searching. This is actually quite common way of mapping hiking routes and makes the data more tidy.
There are dedicated hiking maps that show these names from relations. Though, some maps have made a decision of not showing them and in my opinion adding the names as a workaround goes against the creators intent.
Cheers
TomPar (2024-03-04 02:34:20+00:00): Mashin, can you point to any other mappers in CT or elsewhere in New England/NY that are actively removing accurate names from paths/footways to support your assertion: "quite common way of mapping hiking routes".  I have been involved in multiple threads over multiple years of people complaining about your practice of removing names.  I map a lot in MA/VT/NH and see no one else doing this.  CT is the land of nameless trails on Strava/AllTrails/Gaia etc.

I completely understand (and technically agree with) your argument and wish we could just rely on name in the route relation.  Unfortunately, OSM is far from having a perfect data model schema nor are the popular downstream data users completely adequate in their data parsing.  For the sake of real-world practicality, and to adhere to the OSM tenet of "community cohesion over data perfection", I request you abandon your practice of removing valid names from path/footway ways.  Thank you.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-04 08:17:13+00:00): I would rather focus on whether paths are themself having names.

If they have then removing names is wrong (and I heard from multiple USA mappers that in USA path commonly are named after hiking route using them).

If they do not have names then adding names to them is deliberate mistagging for renderer which would be at best controversial ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Mistagging_for_the_renderer )
ElliottPlack (2024-03-06 16:13:03+00:00): Mashin,

It is fine to leave the trail names even if you've added a relation. I find it destructive and counter productive to remove them. Here are some precedential examples:

1. [Queen's Loop @ Bryce Canyon NP](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/650406545). The most popular hiking trail in the United States.
2. [Angels Landing Trail @ Zion NP](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14326868). Second most popular in the US. Includes a similar named route.
3. [Appalachin Trail @ Vermont](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149171259) The AT hopefully needs no introduction. Looking at the VT relations most are named.

> This is actually quite common way of mapping hiking routes and makes the data more tidy.

This is not common in my experience and sure it is a more normalized but tidy data is not always to the most usable. I value usable data over clean data.

For every map that uses relations, there is another that doesn't. Please refrain from removing names from trails until there is consensus on the topic. Join the conversation on the OSM community forum here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/trails-use-name-and-or-hiking-route/110106

Thank you,  
Elliott Plack  
Data Working Group  
OSMF
jnighan (2024-04-05 04:53:52+00:00): Hi, please read the documentation on the tags leisure=park and leisure=nature_reserve. Even though state parks often have "Park" in the name, they typically should be tagged as Nature Reserves in OpenStreetMap and not Parks. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dnature_reserve

Also, the different landuse features within the state park should not be inner parts of the multipolygon relation. I have reverted these changes
ALu68 (2024-03-04 20:30:10+00:00): Hallo Profpatsch,

Wenn sich die Nutzung eines shops, amenity=* ändert, bitte nicht den originalen Knoten/Weg löschen und ein neues Objekt erstellen - sondern ändern.

Siehe Wiki "Erhalte die Chronik":
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik%E2%86%99
VLD549 (2024-06-24 15:03:28+00:00): Hi, I agree with the name change, but shouldn't it be TotalEnergies Gilze INZ Broekakkers??

Thank you!
A67-A67 (2024-06-25 09:34:29+00:00): No, inz is short for inzake. The name is after that.
Jimi Lappalainen (2024-03-02 20:37:44+00:00): Siis PARILLINEN puoli...
opendcc (2024-08-24 17:30:46+00:00): Hallo, ist der Name des Weges da wirklich auf Wegweisern o.ä. zu finden?
Franz M (2024-08-25 09:00:32+00:00): Name entfernt. Siehe Kommentar zur Notiz