piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aseidel (2023-08-02 10:34:07+00:00): Liebe GretaMNeu,
bitte am Heinser Weg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208137441) die Tags entfernen, die sich auf den Fußweg nördlich der Straße beziehen. Dort liegt eine separate Liniengeometrie, auf der bereits alle Angaben vorhanden sind.
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
user_5359 (2023-07-25 12:44:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys). Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org
Svalbard (2023-07-26 09:32:52+00:00): Hallo Dizzy_, hast Du Deine Anpassung für [1] vor Ort ermittelt? Der surface ist kein Asphalt, sondern der kurze Weg besteht aus gewöhnlichen Gehwegplatten (Beton). Ein „footway“ ist es auch nicht, da das entsprechende Verkehrszeichen fehlt. Gruß Svalbard

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/487577008/history#map=19/53.93844/9.50371
Carto'Cité (2023-08-08 13:58:39+00:00): Bonjour Secouss,
Tu as ajouté par erreur avec StreetComplete 2,5 km de pistes cyclables fausses :)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526846612
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462732780
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462732788
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462732782
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529024125
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529024127
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462732789
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462732787
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462732786
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526846613
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157796184
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462735099
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462735098
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157796173
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147636953
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549053666
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549053667
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549053669
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33070826
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431547274
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431548427
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147638088
Je me permets de corriger et n'hésite pas si tu as la moindre remarque.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Jordi MF (2023-07-25 11:03:34+00:00): Por favor,
No hagas este tipo de ediciones. No edites el nombre oficial y correcto, en valenciano, y elimines la etiqueta "name:ca" ya que es correcta. El nombre de los centros educativos no debe ser el abreviado.
ExoMal (2023-07-28 23:07:17+00:00): Hi BigusDeekus, welcome to OpenStreetMaps.

A few things to note:

1. After you're done drawing a building, you should select it and press Q. This will make sure that all of the building's sides are at right angles to one another, which is almost always the case in real life.

2. When you drew the building, you attached one of its points to a "landuse=residential" way. You should *generally* avoid attaching buildings and highways to landuse ways because this makes it harder to edit them in the future if need be.

3. I've also made the building geometry a bit more detailed, but that's just me. Don't worry about getting the geometry of buildings exactly right, the most important thing is they're added to the map at all. Someone else can always come along and refine the details if need be.

Otherwise, your tagging looks good, more detail than one would usually expect which is nice. if there's anything else you want to know, feel free to ask :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138981749
Jordi MF (2023-07-25 10:58:55+00:00): Hola,
Te informo que el nombre de las calles debe de ir con el nombre que aparece en las placas. En la Pobla Llarga, los nombres están en valenciano, por tanto es incorrecto modificar la etiqueta "name" para eliminar el nombre correcto y ponerlo en castellano.
Por favor, no realices este tipo de ediciones porque tendremos que revertirlas.
Saludos,
Jordi

PD: No es de recibo que copies mi nombre de usuario para hacer ediciones malintencionadas a propósito.
Jordi MF (2023-07-25 11:02:30+00:00): Por favor,
No hagas este tipo de ediciones. No edites el nombre oficial y correcto, en valenciano, y elimines la etiqueta "name:ca" ya que es correcta. El nombre de los centros educativos no debe ser el abreviado.
edvac (2023-07-25 11:19:45+00:00): Hola, Jordi MF II,

Estás recibiendo varios mensajes del usuario Jordi MF a las que no contestas.

Las quejas son porque estás cambiando nombres de calles violando, aparentemente, la regla de "Mapear lo que hay sobre el terreno (Map what's on the ground rule).

También estás, aparentemente, abreviando nombres de centros educativos, cuando el consenso no es ese. El consenso es poner el nombre no abreviado en name=* y puedes usar la etiqueta short_name=* para las abreviaturas. Por favor, lee esta wiki antes de continuar: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres

Finalmente, aún no siendo ilegal, no creo que sea muy adecuado usar un nombre tan parecido al de otro usuario. Ten presente que puedes cambiar tu nombre de usuario en todo momento. Mi recomendación es que uses otro.

Por todo esto, por favor, deja un rato de mapear y contesta a las preguntas de Jordi MF. OpenStreetMap es, ante todo, una comunidad de usuarios, y como comunidad debemos mapear de una forma consensuada, discutiendo los diferentes enfoques para llegar a acuerdos y disfrutar cartografiando.

Saludos cordiales,

Rafael Avila Coya, Fundación OpenStreetMap, Data Working Group.

[Ticket#2023072510000192]
Jose Luis Infante (2023-07-25 11:30:08+00:00): Hola,

gracias por la edición, pero habéis eliminado el dato de que se trata de un hotel.

Un saludo!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138982106
Pierre et Vacances (2023-07-25 16:53:45+00:00): Hola! Muchas gracias por el aviso. Ya está añadido dentro de la categoría hotel.
Jose Luis Infante (2023-07-25 17:17:27+00:00): Perfecto!!!
Colbertson (2023-07-25 11:31:23+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway=hangar
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-11 16:36:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/701105757/history has tracktype = unknown that was added in this edit
Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value
JF1 (2024-02-13 16:26:59+00:00): It's great to see areas being mapped rather than just lines :) but please can you update this section so it includes bridges at Hawthorn Road and over the Mersey?
Kai Johnson (2023-07-29 23:27:03+00:00): The tag that was deleted translates to "import=yes". By deleting it, it seems we have lost some important information. Shall we restore this tag?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138983503
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-07-30 03:13:35+00:00): Mr.  Kai Johnson
This tag was added by mistake because I am working on a project to import GNS points to the map of Saudi Arabia, but I did not finish work on correcting errors, final checking, and deleting duplicates before doing the import process, and this peak was already on the map and I corrected its location only and added the tag "يستورد=نعم" by mistake .
Kai Johnson (2023-07-30 14:25:13+00:00): Thanks for the explanation. If you agree the tag should be removed, I think that was the right thing to do.

Also, thanks for working on mapping natural features like this. I do some similar work in the US, and I'm happy to see that the map has more features like this!
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-07-31 07:37:54+00:00): You are welcome and happy mapping
Jordi MF (2023-07-25 11:50:40+00:00): Hola Jordi MF II,
¿Por qué eliminas etiquetas correctas como "name:ca"?
Jordi MF (2023-07-25 11:52:35+00:00): Hola Jordi MF II,

¿Por qué modificas el nombre correcto de las calles para ponerlo únicamente en castellano si la placa de calle está en catalán?

Saludos
Jordi MF (2023-07-25 11:54:51+00:00): En este changeset, como en tantos otros, se ha modificado el nombre principal de la calle (name) en un idioma que no es el que aparece en el placa de calle.
eggie (2023-07-25 12:18:58+00:00): 
Hoi..
Tip.. iets dat er niet meer is kan gewoon van de kaart.
Evt een terugmelding doen bij de BAG anders heb je kans dat het weer geïmporteerd wordt.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2023-07-25 12:26:29+00:00): Voorlopig even demolished:building=yes toegevoegd
silversurfer83 (2023-07-25 14:44:09+00:00): Hi :)

Der Campingplatz war schon sauber in der Datenbank erfasst. Ich habe deinen Eintrag daher wieder entfernt.

Bitte achte darauf, keine Doppeleinträge mit maps.me zu erzeugen. Die app ist leider ziemlich schlecht dafür geeignet die OSM-Datenbank zu bearbeiten. Für unterwegs empfehle ich Alternativen wie vespucci, every door und streetcomplete.

Bei Fragen, immer raus damit

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138984248
Gonéo (2023-10-23 07:14:49+00:00): Bonjour, l'imagerie aérienne ne correspond pas au parking. Il y a un bâtiment à cet endroit. Est-ce qu'il a été rasé ?
Kurosawa06 (2023-10-23 09:33:10+00:00): Bonjour,
Moi, j'ai remis à jour suivant l'image IGN (BDN ortho) de 2022.
La Station SNSM est nouvelle.
J'ai seulement un doute sur le parking.

Je pense que le parking sert de parking pour la station SNSM pour aussi pour la dépose de bateaux en mer (cale).
A vérifier sur place. J'en ai la possibilité.
Gonéo (2023-10-23 09:48:30+00:00): La station SNSM me semble correcte à l'Ouest, par contre selon le niveau de zoom il y a un bâtiment à l'Est du parking. L'une des images n'est pas à jour. Je ne suis pas sur le secteur.
Gonéo (2023-10-23 09:49:57+00:00): J'ai ajouté une note
multimob (2023-07-26 08:40:45+00:00): Hi! Can you please ignore all suggestions about TEC bus stops and routes from your software?
iD has a problem with its source list.  Clicking on "upgrade tags" suggestions corrupts data.
Some suggestions are good but not those about buses. We will open a ticket for iD to ask they fix this asap.
NorthCrab (2023-08-01 20:26:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11066877223
Tutaj w prosty sposób nie dostanę zgody na wejście. Albo access=yes albo access=private w tym przypadku.
Mannivu (2023-07-25 15:59:51+00:00): Ciao :) ti scrivo perché hai richiesto la verifica della modifica e mi sembra corretta (mancano solo da aggiungere le vie di accesso al parcheggio più a nord tra i due)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138984709
silversurfer83 (2023-07-25 12:44:26+00:00): Moin :)
Dass du den Namen rausgenommen hast ist ja in Ordnung.
Wenn du genau schaust, war da schon "abandoned:landuse=quarry" schon als Eigenschaft. Der Steinbruch ist ja nicht mehr in Betrieb, oder? Wenn man noch erkennen kann, dass dort Stein abgebaut wurde, dann mach noch ein "abandoned=yes" dran und lösch die Zeile mit "abandoned:landuse=quarry".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138985058
luiswoo (2023-07-25 16:47:05+00:00): Как бы формат ### к(корпус)# есть стандарт https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0&uselang=ru#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
Руслан Т (2023-07-25 16:52:44+00:00): Здравствуйте! Номер дома взят с адресной таблички на доме. На табличке указан номер через "/", без корпуса. Так же в PKK номер через "/".
luiswoo (2023-07-25 20:24:50+00:00): Там много что может быть написано, но соглашение по стандарту нумерации есть соглашение, что бы не было путаницы: "проспект 40-л. Победы, д 314 к1", и "проспект 40-л. Победы, д 314/ ул ХЗ какая, д. 1" как здесь https://yandex.ru/maps/39/rostov-na-donu/?l=stv%2Csta&ll=39.725527%2C47.220414&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=207.872399%2C1.359104&panorama%5Bfull%5D=true&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=39.739961%2C47.224366&panorama%5Bspan%5D=25.173323%2C15.227958&z=21
Руслан Т (2023-07-26 08:36:31+00:00): В соглашении указано: "Если номер дома написан через дробь, то так и пишется, например, "2/10".", следовательно, что по принципу TotG и согласно соглашению, получается, что надо через дробь.
VlIvYur (2023-07-26 21:07:55+00:00): 314 к1 и 314/1 это два разных адреса и не надо их смешивать в одно. И 314/1 это может быть как 314 по одной улице, а 1 - по другой, так и следующий дом за 314-м во дворе, а за ним 314/2
luiswoo (2023-07-27 10:50:45+00:00): Ну тогда нужно переделывать всю Александровку, СЖМ и ЗЖМ, а не только единичные номера.
mаrаf24 (2023-10-06 08:40:06+00:00): Ten zmapowany MOP działa?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1192087342
Na aktualnych zdjęciu rośnie tu tylko trawa.
Szymson (2023-10-06 10:53:35+00:00): Nie, dopiero jest w budowie, już poprawiłem tagowanie na construction:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142226931
LockOnGuy (2023-07-25 14:33:29+00:00): Thank you! keep up the good work!
BaghdadiMapper (2023-07-25 15:53:47+00:00): Thanks
Senihtu (2025-02-09 15:19:50+00:00): Hi!
Wenn ich das richtig sehe hast Du mit diesem Changeset am Roßbacher Weg den Mümling-verlauf geändert.
Ich kenne mich in der Gegend wirklich nicht aus aber gibt es da tatsächlich einen 90-Grad-Knick?
Weiter frohes Mappen
Senihtu
wermak (2025-02-13 03:01:32+00:00): Flussverlauf korrigiert.
Schöne Grüße
aceman444 (2024-09-04 00:23:12+00:00): Why this change? The traffic signals are still there, just turned off (when you did this change). They are actually enabled at this time. So it was never true that they were unrecoverably removed, which would justify tagging with 'was:'. 'disabled' and 'was' have different meaning. Yes, 'disabled' may be undocumented, which is another reason you should not touch it if you don't know what the original mapper meant.

You provide no source of your change so if you just did a random automatic edit without visiting the place, please refrain from doing such again.
mueschel (2024-09-04 06:23:10+00:00): 'disabled' refers to handicapped people and vehicles for them. 
If the lights are off, but not used any more, the correct prefix would be 'disused'.
aceman444 (2024-09-04 21:15:53+00:00): Yes, 'disused:' could be close to 'disabled:'. But 'was:' is clearly wrong.
'disabled' only refers to disabled people when used as a key (at least on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disabled), not as a key prefix.
Still 'disabled:' and 'disused:' may have slightly different meaning. You again wrongly mean 'lights are not used ANY MORE'. But in reality, the lights are 'not used YET'. In such case prefixes like 'proposed:' or 'construction:' could be handy, but they again do not convey the information that the lights are already fully built, just not enabled/used.
mueschel (2024-09-04 22:04:34+00:00): A tag doesn't magically change its meaning just because of calling it "prefix"  in front of a "key" instead of "key" with a "subkey".
"disabled:XX" is and stays an access tag for disabled vehicles or a property thereof.  It can never be a lifecycle prefix because that would lead to lots of ambiguities.
mueschel (2024-09-06 08:41:35+00:00): How about "unused"? This doesn't contain the "not any more" meaning from "disused" and doesn't have any double meaning like "disabled".
aceman444 (2024-09-29 16:26:55+00:00): Yes, I can use a different prefix :)
Tomas Straupis (2023-07-25 14:35:42+00:00): Ten jau yra pažymėtas konkretus, piliakalnis su pavadinimu, nereikia abstraktaus bevardžio viewpoint. (išėmiau)
MapsInQuestion (2023-07-25 14:39:25+00:00): Jo, bet ten ne mano išgalvotas ;) ten yra pastatyta medinė platforma kaip tik vaizdams, tai manyčiau kad viewpoint tinka.
gscholz (2023-07-27 06:26:34+00:00): Hi Alberto,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=11.31884&lat=46.13889&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=138987410

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the masp. Can you plese fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about how to add hiking routes properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking

Kind regards
Guido
RiverBearings (2023-07-28 16:04:09+00:00): Hello adrianojbr! Hope you are doing well. I wanted to get your opinion on a recent oneway change on a section of Rua Gustavo Bernedet (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1191949596 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/399141501) just north of the Ponte Governador Vilson Pedro Kleinübing bridge (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135631748). 

Mapillary shows a bidirectional street there (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-26.8999155&lng=-48.700852083333&z=17&pKey=503031404212986&focus=photo) but is from 2017. There is also a no left turn restriction (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16126685) that you added recently that in conjunction with the new oneway would make it difficult for south bound traffic on Rua Gustavo Bernedet (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/903544949) to reach the bridge without first navigating to Avenida Mário Uriarte (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/903544948), then next Rua Francisco Reis (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316279196) and finally Avenida Agostinho Alves Ramos (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540074556) before taking a right turn on the bridge.

Do you know of this is the intended route for south bound traffic on Rua Gustavo Bernedet or are more changes to the road data necessary? Thank you for your insights.

—[tradução automática]— 

Olá Adrianojbr! Espero que você esteja bem. Eu queria saber sua opinião sobre uma recente mudança de mão única em um trecho da Rua Gustavo Bernedet (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1191949596 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/399141501) ao norte de a Ponte Governador Vilson Pedro Kleinübing (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135631748).

Mapillary mostra uma rua bidirecional lá (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-26.8999155&lng=-48.700852083333&z=17&pKey=503031404212986&focus=photo), mas é de 2017. Também não há restrição de conversão à esquerda ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16126685) que você adicionou recentemente que em conjunto com a nova via única dificultaria o tráfego no sentido sul na Rua Gustavo Bernedet (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/ 903544949) para chegar à ponte sem primeiro navegar pela Avenida Mário Uriarte (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/903544948), depois pela próxima Rua Francisco Reis (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316279196) e finalmente a Avenida Agostinho Alves Ramos (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540074556) antes de virar à direita na ponte.

Você sabe que esta é a rota pretendida para o tráfego no sentido sul na Rua Gustavo Bernedet ou são necessárias mais alterações nos dados da estrada? Obrigado por seus insights.
adrianojbr (2023-07-28 17:47:51+00:00): Olá, RiverBearings!

Realmente, as suas dúvidas vão ao encontro das reclamações dos moradores: https://diarinho.net/materia/645628/Prefeitura-muda-transito-na-ponte-Tancredo-Neves-e-moradores-reclamam-de-filas

Espero que essa notícia ajude a esclarecer as suas dúvidas.

Talvez sejam necessárias mais alterações, afinal o trabalho de mapear é infinito.

Abraço!
RiverBearings (2023-07-28 22:29:32+00:00): Obrigado pela informação Adriano! Se as estradas mudarem novamente após o feedback do residente de que essa configuração não é ideal, tenho certeza de que você atualizará mais rápido do que poderíamos verificar. Obrigado por isso e boa sorte em seu mapeamento!
adrianojbr (2023-07-28 23:13:55+00:00): Para ser justo, a principal atualização foi feita pelo PatrickySS:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1191949596/history

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=138963524

Assim, espero que ele atualize mais rápido do que poderíamos verificar também. :D

Abraço!
RiverBearings (2023-08-01 00:56:39+00:00): Yes. I noticed that user changed the directionality but saw you added the restriction (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16126686) to the bridge 'Ponte Governador Vilson Pedro Kleinübing’ and thought you might know what is going on there. But all good. Thanks for the info.

—[tradução automática]— 

Sim. Percebi que o usuário mudou a direcionalidade, mas vi que você adicionou a restrição (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16126686) à ponte 'Ponte Governador Vilson Pedro Kleinübing' e pensei que você poderia saber o que está acontecendo lá. Mas tudo bem. Obrigado pela informação.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-25 13:00:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8400745818
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10138076658
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11066997952

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Marek-M (2023-11-03 11:57:18+00:00): Cześć, poprawiłem Twoją trafostację https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1192092740 - w OSM nie dodajemy nazw opisowych, lepiej jest do tego używać dedykowanych tagów.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-25 13:00:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3240389972
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/978802588

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Piotr Strębski (2023-07-27 11:35:55+00:00): poprawiono
Anton Khorev (2024-06-19 14:46:41+00:00): Если некая аптека решила, что она больше не "экспресс", а "центральная", это не значит, что она испарилась и возникла снова. На точке могут быть теги, которые не вы ставили, так что не надо их обнулять пересозданием.
kate_rocketdata (2024-06-19 15:03:16+00:00): Добрый день!
Да, вы правы. Учтем этот момент.
Спасибо!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-25 13:10:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1192094417

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-25 13:10:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2457150243
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/999253688

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
HellMap (2023-07-25 13:39:09+00:00): Sveiki!

Gribēju pieminēt, ka surface=gravel OSM nozīmē parasti ir "lielizmēra grunts akmeņi". Tādi Latvijā ir reti kur. Parasti bezseguma ceļi (tā saucamie "grunts" ceļi/"grantenes") gandrīz vienmēr ir surface=compacted - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dcompacted

Īsti gravel ceļi izskatās šādi: https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/hellphoto?pKey=795381835143910&focus=photo
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-26 05:16:18+00:00): Do not use descriptive names such as "Restroom"

These names and edits have been removed/reverted as appropriate.
silversurfer83 (2023-07-25 13:37:24+00:00): Hi there,

there already is an entry for the Glacier Museum at this place. I deleted your entry and moved the Korean name to the correct entry.

PLEASE DO NOT use the "add place to map" feature of your app as an personal notebook. You edit the OSM-database with that feature.

Safe travels
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138989142
Benoît C MdP (2023-07-26 07:34:18+00:00): Bonjour

Merci pour tes contributions. Mais attention cependant à ne pas supprimer les connections pour les véhicules au débouché des rues piétonnes. Une des conséquences est que les logiciels de routage ne peuvent plus trouver un chemin existant sur le terrain pour les véhicules autorisés.

Bonne continuation

Benoît
Supaplex030 (2023-07-25 16:34:12+00:00): Hallo,

herzlich Willkommen bei OSM!

Bei deiner ersten Bearbeitung hier am Görlitzer Park habe ich Probleme entdeckt. Der Görlitzer Park hat bereits eine Geometrie und einen Namen (siehe hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/15740772), daher ist es unnötig, einen weiteren Namen an einer anderen Geometrie zu hinterlassen.

Außerdem hast du bei deiner Bearbeitung – vermutlich ausversehen? – zwei Geometrien verschoben, siehe https://osmcha.org/changesets/138989318.

Daher habe ich diese Änderungen zurückgesetzt. Falls du Fragen zu OSM hast oder Unterstützung beim mappen benötigst, melde dich gern.

Beste Grüße
Alex