piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
willkmis (2024-01-27 17:22:28+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for going through these mistagged elevations (I'm guessing you're prompted in part by https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/announcement-openlandcovermap/108392?). I agree that this and others that you're editing are almost certainly unit errors where the ele=* tag contains feet rather than meters.

Just as a gentle suggestion, would you mind rephrasing your changeset comment? It's understandable that US mappers, especially newer ones, wouldn't know that ele=* has to be in meters, rather than the elevation in feet that are universally used and often signposted on the peaks themselves in the United States. Calling such cases "feet vandalism" comes off as a bit aggressive and negative, because it implies, at least in my reading, that the original mappers were not acting in good faith. Perhaps something more like "Converting elevations that appear to be in feet into meters per OSM standard tagging" or something would more accommodating?

Again, I have no problem with these edits, it's just a suggestion on how the changeset comment tone comes across to Americans. Feel free to disregard.

Best,
Will
mbe57 (2024-01-27 20:53:24+00:00): Hello Will,
I will not disregard, and I hear you.
So, for future edits I will adapt the wording.
What do you think about this: "ele wrong by a factor of about 3, which hints at feet figures put into the OSM elevation meter field that requires meter values. Feet figures obviously create havoc and pollute the OSM data."
This avoids the term "vandalism" but clearly states the severity of the issue, I think. Your thoughts?
My edits have not been triggered by the post in the link you quoted. But my use case suffers similarly: I am the guy building the world maps for openandromaps.org. And for increasing zoom levels I highlight more and more peaks based on their isolation. You can imagine what happens when you have a mix of meters and feet elevations in a region ...
A hill of 300m mapped as 900 something will blank out a real mountain of 800m. e.g. invalidating my map highlighting.
I would agree that most people who input feet figures do that ignorant of the consequences. (Although it's not SO hard to know that most of the world uses metric measures and to imagine that a transparent mix of both leads to pollution of the database. But let's assume they are just focused on feeding more into OSM, which is good per se; hence vandalism is not an appropriate term for those authors. I bet, though, that there are folks who know well, but feel "imperial" enough to give a sh.. about it. For those my term is even to friendly. But from looking at a peak node we cannot tell about the attitude of the respective author ...
Hence my agreement to adapt the wording for future comments. Can you pls. advise re. my proposal above?
TXs and cheers
Michael
willkmis (2024-01-28 00:05:14+00:00): No worries! I don't know if pollute is the word I would choose, as it again seems a bit strong and negative (imagine if you were a new mapper and someone says that adding a perfectly true elevation you saw on a sign during your hike to the database was polluting OSM!). So I don't even think the last sentence is necessary, but I understand where you're coming from.

PS As a consumer of elevations, you might be interested in this RFC (not by me) for a proposal to formally allow elevations in feet, if the unit is specified, following similar conventions for maxspeed=* and maxheight=*: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rfc-documenting-feet-as-an-an-optional-elevation-unit/108543
mbe57 (2024-01-28 11:50:51+00:00): Next try :-)
"ele wrong by a factor of about 3, which hints at feet figures put into the OSM elevation field that requires meter values. Feet figures obviously create havoc in the OSM data."
Thank you also for the additional link; interesting discussion, but not a magic wand either. I've made a comment in that thread, too.
Cheers
Michael
willkmis (2024-01-28 18:49:44+00:00): Yeah that seems much less prone to misinterpretation! Thanks for engaging with my input :)
mbe57 (2024-01-28 19:13:28+00:00): You're welcome.
flohoff (2024-01-27 13:00:03+00:00): Moin,
nur weil ich es zufällig gesehen habe. 

Deine access tag schlachten sind unnötig. Es gilt da das Prinzip "weniger ist mehr".

Und wenn du einen footway einzeichnest dann ist sowas wie bicycle=no oder motor_vehicle=no total über. Die dürfen da sowieso nicht drauf. Es sind nur fußgänger erlaubt.

Dazu ein access=no + foot=customers ist halt überlappend. 

highway=footway
foot=customers

reicht da aus - Alles andere kann weg.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241666805

Flo
eggie (2024-01-26 16:37:27+00:00): Dag Iwan   Lijkt me oke. 
Opvallend.. de track aan de westzijde sluit niet aan op het Hunterpad?

Klopt dat?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-26 16:54:41+00:00): De witruimte heb ik verwijderd anders ligt er in een mum weer een pad. 
CTRL f5 voor het effect
gr eggie
eggie (2024-01-26 16:39:59+00:00): Het bos heb ik losgemaakt van de kruising
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146714124

MVG
eggie
Shrinks99 (2024-01-26 17:05:10+00:00): Thank you for reviewing and updating :)
DD1GJ (2024-01-26 15:51:16+00:00): Revert, diese Änderung wurde zurückgesetzt.

Hallo utevogt, willkommen bei OSM. Du hattest die ÖPNV-Relation einer Haltestelle gelöscht, die garantiert nichts mit dem Kontrast der Karte zu  tun hat. Was ist das Problem?

Für den Einstieg in OSM gibt es https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim
DaveF (2024-01-28 01:06:57+00:00): Hi
Why have you added a duplicating railway station?
miche101 (2024-01-30 17:57:27+00:00): danke :)
opendcc (2024-01-30 19:22:04+00:00): Wenn ich's schaffe, dann versuche ich landuse=industrial, ind.=depot und einen Name zu setzen. Aber ich finde leider sehr viele Gebäudetags dieses Users, die dann auch mal komplett daneben sind. DWG habe gemeldet, aber da reagiert noch keiner.
miche101 (2024-01-30 21:26:28+00:00): Ja an dieser Stelle ist der Bauhof nicht... Nur rechts daneben der Wertstoffhof... Der Bauhof ist im Brunnenweg 22... Also hier völlig falsch... Das ist nur eine Landwirtschaft Halle plus Lagerplatz einer Baufirma
Adam Franco (2024-01-26 19:34:04+00:00): Once again, please join the community conversation before changing place=* values at 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878

The place=* tag is for the the importance of the community relative to its region, not for the incorporation status. Incorporation status can be placed in the border_type=* tag on the boundary relation for the municipality as is seen in this example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/170184#map=13/44.4938/-71.2237
See this community discussion on this topic: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/administrative-level-of-townships-in-maine/107233

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146722653
NeisBot (2024-01-27 01:31:02+00:00): Hello Highfidelity, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
eteb3 (2025-06-10 18:15:14+00:00): Hi joost,

I get why this change was made, but wonder if cuisine=vegan is after all the right tag. This restaurant markets itself as a vegan restaurant, and is a bit of a destination for vegans, which is why I thought that was appropriate.

Thoughts?

eteb3
eteb3 (2025-06-10 18:15:57+00:00): (it does have dairy products for the die-hard cow-juice guzzlers, but that's a guilty concession)
joost schouppe (2025-06-11 07:07:44+00:00): I only did that as a drive-by edit I believe.
Well, there are (almost) no cuisine=vegan restaurants left in OSM, because vegan is considered a diet property and not a cuisine. So you could revert, but it will likely get removed again. While I get the idea: if you tell me "it's a vegan restaurant", I already have a certain idea about what they are going to be cooking. But then, there are some specifics that your missing: it could be regional, international, macrobiotic, etc. So using the cuisine key for that nuance seems the better option to me
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-01-26 16:22:58+00:00): Hi, welcome! 
Nice edits. 
One thing I've noticed is that you are adding private to many parking lots. Private means that there is some kind of sign which prohibits to park there. Is that so? I've seen some new mappers make such mistakes, so I'm asking just in case since I don't see any signs https://fotoladu.maaamet.ee/etak.php?B=58.82946896978868&L=22.770709492277522&fotoladu
odratolgus (2024-01-26 17:36:46+00:00): Hello
I marked some parking lots private since these are meant to be used by the residents of the nearby buildings, however you are correct in assuming that there are no prohibiting signs.

From your message I assume then that the existence of the aforementioned sign is a prerequisite in order to mark a parking lot private. 

I will rectify these mistakes.

Thank you for bringing this to my attention.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-01-26 18:08:59+00:00): Thank you. Parking is sometimes a problem and residents sometimes don't like when someone else parks near their house, but as long as it's allowed by law, nothing can be done about it and OSM should reflect this reality.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-26 16:02:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Na Bory":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11554308120
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11554308121
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11554308122
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11554308123
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11554308200

"Świętego Józefa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11554308148
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11554308149
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11554308225

"Kąciki":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11554308275
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11554308276
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11554308367
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11554308368
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11554308369
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11554308370

"Zielona":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11554308371
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11554308372

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-01-29 22:24:46+00:00): Poprawione.
eggie (2024-01-26 16:28:04+00:00): Dag Gert... In dat geval wel de uitzonderingen voor tweewielers verwijderen.
oneway:bicycle	no	
oneway:mofa	no	
oneway:moped	yes	
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-26 18:47:16+00:00): Alle verwijzingen naar oneway heb ik verwijderd
oneway=no hoef je niet te taggen op reguliere wegen Dat us default.
MVG
eggie
mavOsaure (2024-01-29 11:47:45+00:00): Bonjour,

je me permets de te contacter car je suis étonné de ta modification: le parking à l'arrière de Pierre de Coubertin est public et son accès ouvert à tous sans restriction (enfin sauf s'il y a eu une modification depuis quelques semaines).
Pour moi le changement s'applique à partir de la borne escamotable, située sous le pont.
Il y a eu des changements récents?

Bien à toi,
mav
GeoAndi (2024-01-27 15:10:07+00:00): Da vending=parking_tickets ja für die Parkscheinautomaten an sich verwendet wird (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:vending=parking%20tickets?uselang=de), werde ich diese bei Gelegenheit mal einzelnen erfassen und die Tags von den Parkplätzen entfernen :-). Viele Grüße.
HAmap (2024-01-27 21:37:44+00:00): Hi GeoAndi,
ich baue die tags am Parkplatz gleich zurück. Verschlimmbessern muss ich nichts ;-)
Danke für den Hinweis und viele Grüße :-)
GeoAndi (2024-01-28 09:00:34+00:00): Kein Problem. Wurde ja bereits wieder zurück gebaut.
dpolovinkin (2025-06-21 22:22:28+00:00): добрый день, вы же явно неправильную геометрию для домов рисуете, зачем, все равно ж потом исправлять))

типо как тут
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243232251
или
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243232252
dpolovinkin (2025-08-31 07:00:31+00:00): ответите?)..
dpolovinkin (2025-12-28 17:46:24+00:00): але?...)))
Sammyhawkrad (2024-01-27 13:47:16+00:00): Hello Dampare, welcome to OSM and I hope to see you continuing to add to the map in Ghana.

As you requested for a review, one thing you must note is that the name=* tag is used for formal names of places and when used, the name value should not be all upper case letters. 

Do not add names to buildings unless the really for names e.g Aseda House, American House, Jubilee House etc. 

I've made changes to your contribution but note this moving forward.

Happy mapping!

Regards,
Sam
MarcoR (2024-01-27 13:58:07+00:00): Ciao e benvenuta/o su OpenStreetMap!

Se mappi un indirizzo civico come nodo di una strada perdi l'informazione che indica su quale lato della strada si trovi il civico. 

Se puoi cerca di mappare i civici come nodi separati in corrispondenza dell'ingresso a cui sono associati (se è presente un cancello o una porta è corretto aggiungerli ad essi).

Per maggiori informazioni visita la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses#Numero_civico

Buon mapping,
Marco.
amenity internationale (2024-01-26 16:49:06+00:00): la modification porte bien sur le bas de la rue des channelles, et non pas sur la rue champfleuri comme indiqué dans le commentaire de la modification 146716965
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-26 16:50:14+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10157796115
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164269233

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2024-01-27 01:31:04+00:00): Hi Militaryfamily VISTA 👋

your recent changeset has been marked due to a temporary or permanent block from further map edits. 

If you have any questions or if there's anything you'd like to discuss regarding the mapping, feel free to reach out! 

Best regards, 🤖

Details https://osm.org/user_blocks/15616
#ContributorHasBeenBlocked
rene78 (2024-01-27 04:15:13+00:00): Hi Fabian,

von wem kommt denn die Aussage, dass "Ihr" nicht in der Karte sein wollt? Vom Rektor der Schule?

Danke und Gruss
René
rene78 (2024-01-27 04:19:02+00:00): Jeder kann ja online die Lage herausbekommen: 
https://www.bve-singen.de/ueber-die-bve/standort-byk-gulden.html

Vielleicht könntest Du Deine Änderung wieder rückgängig machen? Danke im Voraus!
Fabian007 (2024-01-28 15:55:08+00:00): Halllo rene78,

Ich habe die Änderungen wieder rückganig gemacht.

Ich hoffe, es stimmt alles wieder, wie vohin.

Sorry, wegen das Löchen, der Gebäude!

Aber Trtotzdem wünsche ich dir einen Wunderbaren Sonntag Abend dir noch!

MFG Fabianbuecheler
rene78 (2024-01-29 07:19:54+00:00): Super, danke! Sieht gut aus.

Alles Gute!
René
Fabian007 (2024-01-31 19:04:33+00:00): Hallo Rene78,

Danke für die Nachricht.

Danke, das sie mir geschrieben haben, das es gut aussieht, und danke für die Glückwünsche!

Ich wünsche dir einen wunderschönen Abend dir noch!

MFG Fabianbuecheler
Fabian007 (2024-01-31 19:09:16+00:00): 

Hallo Rene78,

Sorry, Ich habe leider ein Rechtschreibungsfehler gemacht. Ensschuligung!

Was ich eigendlich schreiben wollte, ist,

Vielen Dank für deine Nachricht!

Danke, das du mir geschrieben hast, das es gut aussieht, und danke für die Glückwünsche!

Ich wünsche noch einen wunderschönen Abend dir noch!

MFG Fabianbuecheler
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-26 17:00:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10157893376
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10157893389
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1096316873
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/887645979

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
literan (2024-01-26 17:01:57+00:00): не надо спамить, а то будет блок
Antiolegmelnikov (2024-01-26 19:07:31+00:00): Я не спамлю, у меня несколько точек в разных городах, если вы заметили. В Москве, Минске, Питере, Тбилиси, Баку. Это видно и по ссылкам и по номерам телефонов. Так можно ж?
literan (2024-01-27 10:29:41+00:00): каких точек? что эта точка представляет собой на местности?
Antiolegmelnikov (2024-01-27 12:06:56+00:00): Это бар, в котором мы встречаемся
literan (2024-01-28 09:11:45+00:00): бар уже отмечен на местности, другой точкой его дублировать не нужно.
Antiolegmelnikov (2024-01-28 09:16:28+00:00): Бар, это бар. А внутри бара ещё может находится помещения. Такое бывает, и чтоб люди не тупили и не искали, я и указываю, что именно в этом месте и наша локация. Знаете такое?)
literan (2024-01-28 09:25:16+00:00): не морочьте мне голову. Для помещений есть свои теги, и ваш бизнес тут ни при чем. 

В OSM вносятся только физически существующие стационарные объекты, к которым не относится "несколько людей, собирающихся иногда за столиком".

С моей стороны разговор закончен, при продолжении спама вас ждет только блокировка
soyandaluz (2024-01-26 16:59:19+00:00): En la placa identificativa oficial de Excmo. Ayuntamiento de La Línea de la Concepción se puede mostrar el nombre de "Bda. Paraíso - M. González", igual que el resto de barriadas se escriben con la abreviatura "Bda."
Un saludo y perdón por las molestias.
kapazao (2024-05-04 08:45:18+00:00): Hola, esto no funciona así. Revisa la documentación de OSM y páginas como https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas_en_Espa%C3%B1a donde la comunidad ha trabajado y ha llegado a un consenso para especificar cómo editar algunos elementos para que cada uno no lo haga como le parezca.
En este caso se te ha explicado varias veces en algunos mensajes que los nombres no se abrevian y pareces no querer entenderlo.
Algunos invertimos nuestro tiempo en corregir estos errores y no tenemos la necesidad de estar contínuamente explicando esto y corrigiéndolo, por lo que espero que entiendas que supone una molestia para otros que edites a tu manera y agradeceríamos que pusieras de tu parte en enteder que es un proyecto colaborativo y afecta a otros.
Un saludo
VLD549 (2024-07-26 10:54:29+00:00): Hi, could you provide a link to a source of some sort, to confirm the name change from Henriette Roland Holstlaan to Rotonde Aan de Wassum ?
On Bing Maps for example it doesn't show to be a roundabout. 
Thank you in advance!
Joopvdl (2024-07-26 13:26:21+00:00): See the sign above the roundabout sign on this Mapillary Photo:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.377643000000006&lng=6.135580100001562&z=19.9&pKey=394264506670749&focus=photo&x=0.4946397680390784&y=0.4124883102160354&zoom=0
VLD549 (2024-08-29 14:12:45+00:00): Thank you!
SpinOff (2024-01-26 20:57:23+00:00): Można by jeszcze delikatnie wygładzić łuki na Morelowej, ale bez zbędnej szczegółowości. 2 nowe node'y na każdym łuku wystarczą.
mavl (2024-03-23 14:38:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
mavl (2024-03-23 14:39:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
NeisBot (2024-01-27 01:31:03+00:00): Hello ParadoX_ZLWC, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
watmildon (2024-01-26 19:13:00+00:00): Thank you for investigating this!
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-30 18:52:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152050669 where the changeset comment is: revert garage edits that claimed ownership over data. Anyone can edit OSM data; if you do not like that, do not upload.
MarcoR (2024-01-27 13:13:47+00:00): Ciao e benvenuti su OpenStreetMap!

In genere le scuole si mappano disegnando l'area di competenza della scuola e aggiungendo ad essa amenity=school, il nome ed eventuali altri dettagli (ad es. il codice meccanografico). 

Sull'edificio non andrebbe aggiunto alcun nome a meno che non ne abbia uno ufficiale oppure almeno conosciuto/utilizzato da chi lo frequenta.

Vedete la wiki per ulteriori informazioni: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:amenity%3Dschool#Come_mappare .

Buon mapping,
Marco.
MxxCon (2024-02-04 06:20:37+00:00): Hello.
You added addr:unit=Leasing Office. That doesn't seem to be a correct or valid address value. This kind of information is more suitable for description= tag. You also added created a landuse= node inside the perimeter of a building... Semantically that doesn't seem to make sense.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146718359
questfinder (2024-02-04 15:25:06+00:00): Thanks for your review; you can check the DC. I'm not reworking anything; I have visited these addresses and used the NJ Bureau of GIS as source. I have already created this location with the appropriate tags as per OSM Wiki. Not to waste my time, go ahead and update all my work. YOU ARE WELCOME.
MxxCon (2024-02-04 15:43:14+00:00): Alright, refusing to cooperate and improve on your mapping deficiencies. I'll raise your account to DWG's attention, which can result in temporary or permanent suspension.
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-30 18:52:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152050669 where the changeset comment is: revert garage edits that claimed ownership over data. Anyone can edit OSM data; if you do not like that, do not upload.
SpinOff (2024-01-26 20:40:03+00:00): Hej. Kilka uwag co do tej drogi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243246720

1. Tagi typu motor_vehicle=yes są zbedne, ponieważ domyślnie highway=track jest dostępna dla wszystkich
2. Kombinacja tagów surface=sand i tracktype=grade1 jest prawie na pewno niepoprawna. grade1 to droga która ma litą nawierzchnię, a piasek taką na pewno nie jest. Polecam te dwa artykuły: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:tracktype https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:surface
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-09 15:17:24+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11554503086/history has nature = tree that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Was it supposed to be natural=tree? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree (though maybe it is not a tree anymore?)
igor2 (2024-03-09 15:34:51+00:00): Yes, it's definitely a typo, thank you! I'm going to fix it.
MxxCon (2024-02-04 06:22:16+00:00): In this edit you again hijacked an address node and converted it into a landuse tag.. That doesn't seem correct. Why not add all those other relevant tags to the landuse area itself?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146718895
questfinder (2024-02-04 15:26:13+00:00): Thanks for your review; you can check the DC. I'm not reworking anything; I have visited these addresses and used the NJ Bureau of GIS as source. I have already created this location with the appropriate tags as per OSM Wiki. Not to waste my time, go ahead and update all my work. YOU ARE WELCOME.
MxxCon (2024-02-04 15:44:53+00:00): Ah, it's bad to waste your time, but ok to waste my time fixing your sloppy mapping? That's rather disrespectful.