piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aceman444 (2024-01-28 13:46:25+00:00): Zdravim, relacia autobusu 203415 nesplna podmienky pre public_transport:version=2, takze preco ste to pridali a co ste v nej opravili?
Tomas_J (2024-01-28 13:53:01+00:00): Pozriem a opravim podľa v. 2. Pridaval som asi kruhové objazdy alebo som upratoval poradie členov relácie aby nadväzovalo na seba.
divaddivag (2024-01-08 13:16:07+00:00): Sacré boulot! 💪
mueschel (2024-01-14 12:01:16+00:00): Hi,
I found a strange tag "tow_sided" on some benches here. This is not used in other places - what does it mean?
Yod4z (2024-01-17 08:07:16+00:00): keyboard error need to be corrected with two_sided
emersonveenstra (2024-01-08 14:56:59+00:00): Hi there,

Did you mean to remove the highway tags from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/758286595 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680495894?
TheDutchMan13 (2024-01-09 01:51:15+00:00): No, that was accidental. Way trying to remove another tag. Thanks. it's fixed.
flohoff (2024-01-07 21:14:43+00:00): Moin,

du hast hier den weg von einem unclassified zu einem track gemacht. 

Da würde ich wiedersprechen. Da steht ein Haus und track ist definiert als ausschliesslich oder überwiegend landwirtschaftliche nutzung. Hier fährt aber häufiger der Postbote.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37747993

Ich würde das wieder zu einer unclassified machen wollen.

Flo
Glassman (2024-01-07 20:44:00+00:00): The county has this trail shown on their parcel viewer.  Also, you changed it from a footway, which I agree it most likely isn't, to a track, but then said motor vehicles are not allowed. That seems to be a contradiction. I would probably tag this as highway=path, which in the US we call a trail. OSM was started in England so we use their road classification system and British English for tags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146003922
Frans S (2024-01-08 11:32:25+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please don't connect nodes of buildings to other features, like administrative borderlines.
Best regartds
Glassman (2024-01-07 20:35:08+00:00): #TIP: privately owned road can be tagged with operator=. Access=private should only be used if there is signage restricting use or possibly a gate.

Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146004135
emvee (2024-01-07 20:00:22+00:00): Ook Essendijk uitgelijnd/bijgewerkt
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-07 20:10:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Wartość addr:place zawiera błąd w pisowni. Upewnij się, czy wielkość liter jest poprawna, oraz czy nigdzie nie ma dodatkowych znaków.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1237863381

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
charl3s (2024-01-07 20:44:42+00:00): What is this?
JeroenHoek (2024-01-07 20:48:43+00:00): Zitten ze daar? Ik kon geen informatie vinden over dit adres (wel Waachshaven 4), en hun webaanwezigheid staat of uit of is verouderd.
De7vanBlake (2024-01-07 21:07:26+00:00): Snel en goed opgemerkt, is inmiddels hersteld.
JeroenHoek (2024-01-07 21:11:23+00:00): Top, dank je.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-26 15:19:45+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2782926282/history has shop = fast_food that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=fast_food ? Is it amenity=fast_food ? If not, what this tag is intended to mean? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfast_food
TweedehandsKoffie (2024-10-26 19:31:16+00:00): Thank you, it is fixed now.
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-01-07 21:07:49+00:00): Moin CaptainFehlentscheidung,

ändere bitte die Objekte nur, wenn Du sicher gestellt hast, dass diese auch noch existieren. Ansonsten suggeriert Deine Änderung, dass Du die Objekte überprüft hast und diese noch aktuell sind.

Falls Du das getan hast ist alles gut! :-)

Gruß Roger Wilco
Taksine (2024-01-09 02:59:00+00:00): 这Y370是一个圈吗？
Emdier (2024-01-12 22:25:35+00:00): No, I forgot to edit the road number. It should be Y371.
woodpeck (2024-01-07 21:14:50+00:00): Hello there, please do not do wholesale imports of MS building footprints through the RapID editor. You must check the data for correctness before you upload. In this changeset, at least the buildings https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1237882803 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1237882828 are definitely incorrect and should not have been added like that.
NeisBot (2024-01-08 00:18:09+00:00): Hi asdgvbfhdg 👋

your recent changeset has been marked due to a temporary or permanent block from further map edits. 

If you have any questions or if there's anything you'd like to discuss regarding the mapping, feel free to reach out! We're here to help. 

Best regards, 🤖

Details https://osm.org/user_blocks/15556
#ContributorHasBeenBlocked
woodpeck (2024-01-07 21:45:17+00:00): Hey there asdgvbfhdg, no need to click the "save" button after every individual building you upload. You can create 10 or 20 buildings and then upload them all together!
goedegazelle (2024-01-08 08:17:50+00:00): Het veld is een voetbalveld met doelen.
goedegazelle (2024-01-08 15:00:24+00:00): Wacht even, ik vergis me met een ander gedeelte.
literan (2024-01-11 17:16:51+00:00): не надо использовать тег area:highway если вы не понимаете его сути. Он для отрисовки проезжих частей (а не всей территории, прилегающей к развязке, как вы тут сделали).

удалю.
bogas (2024-01-08 07:27:57+00:00): Dziękuję za poprawienie mojego błędu.
mueschel (2024-01-14 12:00:07+00:00): Please check the wifi antennas you added here - I assume there are no circular antennas with a 200 meter diameter placed in the middle of the city.

To tag that a place / square is covered with wifi, you can add the wifi tags to the square itself.
George Karidis (2024-01-14 21:59:52+00:00): The shapes represent the coverage of the antenna, the antennas are located in the middle of the circles.
Thanks for bringing this to my attention, there will be a fix soon.
George Karidis (2024-01-14 22:11:23+00:00): Tags removed:
man_made=antenna
antenna:type=communication
communication:wlan=yes

Features sould be ok now.
Local-Mapper (2024-01-07 22:25:18+00:00): This is a 138kV line. The description is incorrect.
woodpeck (2024-01-07 23:13:14+00:00): Hello Ivan Tarasenko, are you the same person who previously used the "asdgvbfhdg" account? It would be a good idea to avoid making mini-uploads for every building... better to create 10 or 20 buildings and then upload them at once.
Tomas Straupis (2024-01-08 06:31:51+00:00): Hello. Please do not re-classify the roads. They have been classified to clearly depict road network hierarchy. I will revert this.
Martin2035 (2024-01-08 11:02:33+00:00): Hi, thank you for your notice. But the streets are really in „living street" mode, the street signage says. Same with the contra flow bicycle lanes.
Tomas Straupis (2024-01-08 13:13:24+00:00): We have spent quite some time leveraging out required classifications to fit the purpose. And hierarchy of road network is one of them. You cannot always judge the classification just by one criteria. And in general: it is not good to change such things without consulting local mappers who know the actual situation and local agreements.
Martin2035 (2024-01-15 21:36:11+00:00): Thank you for the explanation, didn't know the system is different than most of Europe. :-) Thank you for your work and hopefully I'll visit this nice city soon.
Tomas Straupis (2024-01-16 07:41:42+00:00): In that case: https://craftbeer.openmap.lt ;-)
Martin2035 (2024-01-16 12:46:06+00:00): Haha, thanks.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-07 22:50:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4448143387
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/841337506

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
dadavid (2024-05-07 16:12:15+00:00): Hi SG86, 

gleiche Frage hier [1] und hier [2]. Der von dir verwendete tag operational_status ist deprecated [3], wird also nicht mehr genutzt. Ich glaube hier kannst du mit dem tag old_name=* [4] an den jetztigen Geschäften aber ziemlich genau die Info abbilden, die du möchtest :) 

Grüße
David

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2990495109

[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1876507078

[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:operational%20status=closed?uselang=de

[4] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:old_name
karachi_nng (2024-09-27 09:56:43+00:00): some service roads at these coordinates got jpbeeckman@gmail.com roadname
50.162623,4.532724
50.170994,4.511391
50.130719,4.674595
50.174015,4.525198
karachi_nng (2024-09-27 10:03:40+00:00): Are you sure you would like to edit this way?
jpbeeckman (2024-09-27 11:48:46+00:00): sorry, it's an automatic function of my PC that puts my email address as the object name. I don't always realize it. I'm switching to JOSM to avoid this problem. Thanks for letting me know. Best regards
osminng (2024-09-30 07:51:35+00:00): Hello all, 

Some other occurrences were left in the database (e.g. landuse, building, track, road node). 

Now, they are all removed. e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157283889
karachi_nng (2024-09-30 08:46:04+00:00): Thank you both!
Davileci (2024-08-26 16:28:07+00:00): disused:railway=station should not be used for the station building.
rskedgell (2024-01-11 08:41:48+00:00): You appear to have tagged sections of Chessington Road and the B284 roundabouts as foot=no in response to a StreetComplete task asking "Are pedestrians forbidden to walk on this road here?"

I'm trying to find any evidence in Bing Streetside imagery that there really is a (signed) pedestrian prohibition here. I cannot see any TSRGD diagram 625.1 "pedestrians prohibited" signs on the imagery, so do not believe that a prohibition exists. Is this a new signed restriction created by a traffic order more recent than the Bing streetside imagery?

The wiki states that access tags reflect legal access. Subjective opinions about whether it would be pleasant, a good idea, safe, etc. for a particular transport mode are not relevant to legal access.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot

As real pedestrian prohibitions on public roads other than those tagged as highway=motorway or motorroad=yes in the UK are quite rare and are always signed, this quest is probably better left disabled.
Jacopo (2024-11-08 10:53:05+00:00): Ciao
Vedo che la zona di fronte al supermercato Esselunga è taggata come "milityary bunker", si tratta immagino di un semplice errore di tag. Cambio in modo da correggere, fammi sapere se deve restare come bunker.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-08 00:00:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362729676

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
spiregrain (2024-01-08 13:42:22+00:00): Hi There - I see you have tagged this as an Expressway.  Do you have a source for that?  Asking because there was a recent online discussion about UK Expressways on reddit, and the consensus seemed to be that there are no UK roads that have been designated as Expressways yet.
Falsernet (2024-01-14 18:55:12+00:00): Hi. I can acknowledge the lack of official expressway classification. However the tag is appropriate here according to the OSM wiki ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:expressway ).

I added the tag here specifically as the road meets the criteria of it being a dual carriageway, having controlled/limited access i.e. sliproads, and having a relatively high travel speed.

I am adding the tag more widely as the classification of roads in the UK (e.g. highway=trunk) doesn't reflect the design and features of a road, but instead the strategic classification choices by government entities. This is unlike the tagging in other countries which tag based on their opinions. For example in France, there are breaks in otherwise highway=trunk routes just because the road is a single carriageway for a short stretch.

In short, this isn't a tag introduced to reflect a formal classification, but to reflect the high-speed design features of a road, where the highway=* key covers the formal classification already.

Cheers,
Sam.
spiregrain (2024-01-14 19:42:32+00:00): Thank you.  I hadn't heard of expressways until a few days ago, when I stumbled upon a reddit thread on the subject.  THEN your changeset popped up on my osmcha feed.  

Understand what you've down now and it makes sense to me.

Here's that thread-  https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/18vamz6/uk_expressways/

Cheers,

Ken
sjakobi (2024-01-08 10:11:37+00:00): Vielen Dank für dein Update! Verstehe ich den surface-Tag für https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71610655 richtig, dass dort nebeneinander oder vermischt sowohl Asphalt als auch Kopfsteinpflaster liegt? Meines Wissens wäre das richtige Tagging dafür dann surface=asphalt;cobblestone. (Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multiple_values). Danke!
wermak (2024-01-08 17:07:14+00:00): Korrigiert. 
Danke.
Syl (2024-01-08 17:00:35+00:00): Bonjour, avec un groupe de modifications aussi grand et aucun numéro des notes concernées ça va être compliqué de vérifier quoi que ce soit dans une semaine quand les notes résolues auront disparu.
Pour les prochaines fois serait-il possible de limiter la taille des groupes (à la taille d'un département par exemple) et préciser les notes concernées ?
Et sinon, en regardant quelques modifications je suis étonné que la BDOrtho et le cadastre ai permis de vérifier l'ensemble de ces notes.
D'autres sources ont été utilisés pour confirmer le contenu des notes ?
gendy54 (2024-01-08 17:13:57+00:00): Hello,

C'était un essai de ce site. Au vu des remontées que tu me fais et qui sont évidemment pertinentes, je me demande quel est son intérêt du coup à ce site. J'ai essayé de faire gaffe à la bbox, mais c'est rapé... surtout quand tu envoies à 2h du mat.

Pour les notes, j'ai pris des notes suffisamment précises ou déjà corrigées ou relativement récentes pour ne pas avoir à chercher d'autres infos. Genre nouveau magasin il y a quelques semaines/mois.
Syl (2024-01-08 18:02:50+00:00): Effectivement l'intérêt de cet outil est limité, c'est fait pour traiter une note de temps en temps. Pour traiter un grand nombre de notes il y a d'autres outils.

Même pour des notes récentes le contenu doit toujours être vérifié et confirmé par une autre source. Sinon ce serait beaucoup trop simple de vandaliser OSM comme ça, sans avoir à créer de compte.
Je rencontre régulièrement des notes récentes dont le contenu s'avère faux après croisement avec d'autres sources ou vérification sur place.
gendy54 (2024-01-08 18:06:22+00:00): OK ca marche. Merci pour ton retour.
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-08 05:20:37+00:00): What's up with consistently not adding the golfcart paths as a bridge over water?  Like why end your cartpaths so abruptly?

I have fixed these for you, and have cleaned up other mistakes.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-02-04 03:41:53+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147040207
i2004 (2024-01-08 01:49:04+00:00): la 91 llega ahora hasta plaza de mayo
i2004 (2024-01-08 01:50:19+00:00): no va mas hasta retiro
scarapella (2024-12-06 13:29:07+00:00): Hey Zelonewolf,

Looks like this edit broke r13363410.  Not sure how important or not the zip code boundaries are in OSM, but I noticed it so I thought I'd mention it. Anyway you are the boundary guy so I leave it to you to decide :-)

Cheers,
scarapella
ZeLonewolf (2024-12-06 13:39:07+00:00): Grumble grumble ok thanks!
ZeLonewolf (2024-12-06 13:41:03+00:00): All set!
scarapella (2024-12-06 21:54:49+00:00): Don’t think of me as bringing bad news. Think of me as bringing you another opportunity to edit OSM! ;-)
mrpulley (2026-02-28 08:04:37+00:00): Nancy Bird Walton Drive:
maxspeed 50 986835176 (not 80), 1237939580 (not 60).
697181012 and 697181014 northern halves 80 (not 60), southern halves 50 (not 60)
697181013 maxspeed correct
Exit ramp 608018806 maxspeed 110 (not 100)
Ocean Drive 71897012 maxspeed 50, becomes 60 at eastern end
Fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176262329
Bethesda Place 320661577 I didn't see maxspeed sign (didn't go up road to check)
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-08 05:17:25+00:00): Why did you change the parking lot to a building?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146012018
Frans S (2024-01-10 11:32:19+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings clustered.
Buildings not squared.
Buildings overlooked.
Quality prevails above quantity

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146012028
OldManCelli (2024-01-29 17:17:11+00:00): Hello Yaglin! Not sure what is happening to your buildings but w1237945418 is an invalid shape for a building. Can you please correct or delete the invalid buildings?
Happy Mapping!
Nawfal85 (2024-01-08 17:34:27+00:00): good job Lamasso
webfil (2024-03-18 16:30:13+00:00): Bonjour. J'ai renversé plusieurs des changements que vous avez apporté puisqu'ils contenaient des erreurs. Il s'agit d'un nœud dupliqué avec le nœud 
360895664 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/360895664).
tyfi (2024-01-08 03:22:57+00:00): I kept the part of T to the west of 54 as secondary, as it forms a bypass on Old 54.
GOwin (2024-01-19 01:11:09+00:00): Hello Vincent. How are you? Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I'm curious about what you're trying to do here, and maybe we, in the local community can help you achieve what you're trying to do?

We have different channels listed here: https://osm.org/wiki/PH, in case you'd like to reach out, or have questions.
Vincent Laurent (2024-01-19 05:39:20+00:00): Hello Gowin, I was actually trying to add all public transportation of the country to make an app for offline navigaiton for each province on Android as it exists only for Manila (and Cebu is handling with ggl maps). Google maps was too expensive or restriction so it couldn't work. I tried OSM but it's too complicated to my taste so it's taking too long...

If you want to help and/or know someone that could, just let me know :)
GOwin (2024-01-19 05:49:05+00:00): I'm certain that some folks from the community will find it interesting. 

I agree with your observation that there's a large gap between urbanized areas and rural towns, and this really boils down to not having **local** mappers who can improve the map.

Anyway, could you elaborate about the source of your "jeepney" dataset?
Vincent Laurent (2024-01-19 06:03:28+00:00): Basically, I find list online, I improve it with a python script to get the locations correct in ltn lgt but its not enough as they turn on their own and not especially on the shortest way on the map. Here is an example of what i could get easily automatically from a list to a map

https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/edit?mid=1qaxZC1yMwC9ZIOImv2wAPlcDIv625ck&ll=14.699465589643241%2C121.05321534781078&z=13
Vincent Laurent (2024-01-19 06:04:30+00:00): So basically, i have the script to make terminals showing all the routes and routes and ltn lgt. But i need a trustable source....
GOwin (2024-01-19 06:12:27+00:00): Yes, and the OpenStreetMap community is also interested in knowing whether the source and the license of your dataset is compatible for use in OSM.

It would be helpful if you can be more specific about your sources.
ika-chan! (2024-01-08 03:41:35+00:00): Sorry about the size: I was working straight off https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/hdyc-osmi-issues?uid=4763179, which has no indication of location.
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-08 05:25:51+00:00): This should not have been deleted.  Access=private should have been applied instead.  This is to prevent someone from completely readding it.  If we tag it as private, then people will know it is added, etc.

I have reverted this changeset to readd it, and have added the private access tag instead.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146013392
webfil (2024-03-18 16:24:10+00:00): Bonjour. J'ai renversé plusieurs des changements que vous avez apporté puisqu'ils contenaient des erreurs. J'ai rétabli le nom « Notre-Dame-de-Montauban » puisqu'il correspond à la signalisation routière en place de même qu'aux répertoires toponymiques gouvernementaux. J'ai plutôt ajouté la valeur "Notre-Dame-des-Anges" au champ 'old_name' pour le point du village. Plus d'info @ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place
webfil (2024-03-18 16:22:15+00:00): Bonjour. J'ai renversé plusieurs des changements que vous avez apporté puisqu'ils contenaient des erreurs. J'ai rétabli les propriétés de l'église, qui avait été confondue avec le bureau de poste.
mga_geo (2024-01-31 06:36:05+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi avez-vous modifié l'attribut "network" des relations route=bus ?
Sur l'ensemble de ce réseau, cet attribut est à "FR:Vitobus".
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
Merci d'avance
Marc
Necessarycoot72 (2024-01-31 21:47:28+00:00): Hi
I add those tags because the iD editor recommended those edits. If they were wrong, I can revert this changeset and add the tag not:wikidata=Q56309921 to prevent iD from recommending them.
mga_geo (2024-02-02 06:34:09+00:00): Bonjour,
L'attribut wikidata a la bonne valeur, c'est l'attribut network qui n'a pas la bonne valeur.
Marc
Necessarycoot72 (2024-02-02 07:52:43+00:00): Ah, looking at the network tag on wiki, the feature should be tagged as "network=FR:Vit'o Bus". (if this is incorrect, please specify what it should be tagged as.) But assuming I'm correct. Attempting to tag it as "network=FR:Vit'o Bus", iD will still prompt the user to change it. If I'm correct, then I think this is an issue with iDs tagging schema.
If this is an issue you care about, and I'm correct, then I suggest you create an issue over at the iD schema GitHub to correct it. https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/issues/new/choose
mga_geo (2024-02-02 08:24:34+00:00): La valeur pour l'attribut network est "FR:Vitobus" sur les autres relations de ce réseau comme sur ces relations précédemment.
Je n'ai pas les compétences suffisantes pour faire un ticket à iD.
Marc
Necessarycoot72 (2025-01-06 05:45:25+00:00): Hi, what was the source of the offical_name tag on the Village of Albany? (relation 199076). I tried finding it, but I couldn't.
ezekielf_import (2025-03-12 13:08:37+00:00): Sorry I didn't see this comment until now.  I usually look at town and village websites and/or official planning documents to see how the refer to themselves.  In this case I'm having a hard time finding a document containing the string "Village of Albany".    Albany doesn't seem to have a website but this is probably the closest thing: https://www.nvda.net/albany.php
From there, the linked town plan refers to the "Town of Albany" but beyond that only contains references to the "Village".  The Hazard Mitigation Plan refers to the "Town and Village of Albany" but not just the "Village of Albany" alone.  I may have extrapolated a bit and assumed that "Village of Albany" is likely the official name in keeping with pattern used by most other Vermont Towns and Villages.  Anyway, the official_name tag  is much less important than primary name tag, so if you're uncomfortable with such shaky evidence I have no problem removing it. 

https://www.nvda.net/town_files/Albany_Town%20Plan_Albany%20Town%20Plan.pdf

https://www.nvda.net/hmp-plans/AlbanyHMP.pdf
ezekielf (2025-03-12 16:06:50+00:00): Aaand of course I was accidentally logged into my import account.  The above message is from me.