piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Langlaeufer (2024-06-14 15:28:00+00:00): Die aktuellen Sperrungen kenne ich nicht aber highway =construction hatte schon jemand anderes entfernt
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152583301
Langlaeufer (2024-06-14 15:31:16+00:00): Hier steht: https://www.ls.brandenburg.de/ls/de/bauen/baustelleninformationssystem/
Grundhafter Straßenausbau in Bauabschnitten unter Vollsperrung
vom 22.05.2023 bis 18.07.2024
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152583301
Langlaeufer (2024-06-14 15:39:04+00:00): Auch laut google und tomtom noch gesperrt. Ich habe es wieder auf access=no gesetzt. Radfahrer und Fußgänger sind frei?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152583301
OliverMi1 (2024-06-14 15:43:13+00:00): Fußgänger glaube ich ja, Radfahrer dann nur über den Bürgersteig, aber der ist eigentlich nur für Fußgänger
mmis-berg (2024-06-14 16:48:46+00:00): Die gesamte Schönfließer Straße zwischen August-Müller-Straße und Ortseingang ist noch in Bau und nur für Fußgänger passierbar. Der Teil nördlich der Ahornallee wurde später gesperrt und später begonnen und ist noch nicht so weit fortgeschritten und noch weit von einer Fertigstellung entfernt. Stand von heute Morgen.
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
DD1GJ (2024-06-13 06:18:52+00:00): Wieder auf Bildungseinrichtung zurückgesetzt. Die Änderung in "Training" hätte auch nicht den gewünschten Erfolg. Auf der (rechtsunwirksamen) Bubatzkarte werden nur normale staatliche und staatlich anerkannte Schulen markiert, jedoch keine allgemeinen Bildungseinrichtungen. Der Gesetzgeber hat sich da nicht klar genug ausgedrückt.
Langlaeufer (2024-06-13 10:21:59+00:00): Die Straße war bereits vorhanden. Ein Problem mit dem Editor?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152583519
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-13 06:39:32+00:00): hello akuksouski_lyft acording to my observation your mapping looks good.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152583601
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
Langlaeufer (2024-06-13 09:53:01+00:00): Die Straße war bereits korrekt erfasst. Die Access-Werte sind zudem falsch. der korrekte Wert lautet für bicycle und foot use_sidepath. Reiter müssen hingegen sogar die Fahrbahn benutzen.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152583628
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-13 06:38:18+00:00): hello akuksouski_lyft acording to my observation your mapping looks good.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152583672
literan (2024-06-12 12:26:01+00:00): все криво, и номер дома, и addr:city

вас руководство обучало внесению адресов или нет?
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-13 06:33:59+00:00): hello akuksouski_lyft acording to my observation your mapping looks good.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152583722
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-13 06:32:06+00:00): hello akuksouski_lyft acording to my observation your mapping looks good.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152583754
literan (2024-06-12 12:25:09+00:00): слово "село" лишнее, да и тег addr:city избыточен
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-13 06:30:20+00:00): hello akuksouski_lyft acording to my observation your mapping looks good.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152583787
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-13 06:29:16+00:00): hello akuksouski_lyft acording to my observation your mapping looks good.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152584030
literan (2024-06-12 12:23:11+00:00): слово "Деревня" лишнее. Да и вообще это тег addr:city не требуется, он избыточный
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-12 15:24:11+00:00): Hello Mr. akuksouski_lyft  according to observation your mapping looks good so keep it up.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152584437
literan (2024-06-12 17:32:22+00:00): кривой формат адрески. Нужно ставить пробел перед буквами "вл", "к" и "с", обозначающими владение, строение и корпус

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
Hufkratzer (2024-06-12 22:29:54+00:00): Hi,
This object seems to be a building but you have removed the tag building=yes from it. Therefore it is no longer rendered like a building.
You have replaced the building tag with tag leisure=horse_riding, but this tag is not for buildings, it is for complete riding centres, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:leisure=horse_riding and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/817128685 (example).
If the building is an indoor arena you can use tag building=riding_hall, example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146763960
Vinber-Pro (2024-06-17 10:29:16+00:00): Hi @Hufkratzer,

  CCBG enfance - jeunesse told me that you ask them some informations on this changeset !

You're right, i modified, you can see here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152795678

thanks to your attention !
regards
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-12 15:12:29+00:00): Hello Mr. akuksouski_lyft according to observation your mapping looks good so keep it up.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152585254
mavl (2024-06-13 16:05:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-13 06:28:11+00:00): hello akuksouski_lyft acording to my observation your mapping looks good.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152585314
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:05:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-13 06:25:12+00:00): hello akuksouski_lyft acording to my observation your mapping looks good.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152585519
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-03 14:25:38+00:00): can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5077551 ?
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
MxxCon (2024-06-18 01:56:15+00:00): Hello.
Is this building already constructed?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152585996
Joseph DiGiovanni (2024-06-18 02:23:01+00:00): Yes.
literan (2024-06-12 17:31:33+00:00): слово "деревня" лишнее
mavl (2024-06-13 16:05:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-12 14:26:53+00:00): Hello Mr. Derricknehrenberg  according to observation your mapping looks good so keep it up.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152586023
:-} (2024-06-12 19:27:46+00:00): Jesteś pewien, że te węzły drogowe posiadają numery na znakach?
Dawid2849 (2024-06-12 20:51:11+00:00): Edycję wycofałem.
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-13 06:23:13+00:00): hello akuksouski_lyft acording to my observation your mapping looks good.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152586073
SomeoneElse (2024-06-14 11:12:18+00:00): This is entirely unrelated to the Little Ale House (which is in Harrogate!).  I wrote a long detailed changeset comment which seems to have been lost.
What this was actually about was a reconciliation of road and PRoW status based on various sources - survey (and imperfect signage), and PRoW status and road status from https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#15/53.7787/-1.0390/2/P (toggle the PRoW layer and zoom in to see OS OpenMap Local road status.
A Microsoft mapper contacted me because the previous state (a mixture of unclassified and track) was clearly rubbish.
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-12 13:55:44+00:00): Hello Mr. Derricknehrenberg  according to observation your mapping looks good so keep it up.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152586091
literan (2024-06-12 17:30:57+00:00): кривой формат адрески. Нужно ставить пробел перед буквами "вл", "к" и "с", обозначающими владение, строение и корпус

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
literan (2024-06-12 17:31:13+00:00): слово "село" лишнее
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-13 06:22:10+00:00): hello akuksouski_lyft acording to my observation your mapping looks good.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152586232
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-12 13:41:16+00:00): Hello Mr. Derricknehrenberg  according to observation your mapping looks good so keep it up.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152586307
BCNorwich (2024-06-12 16:46:12+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've amended the tags of your business to suit OSM best practice.

Regards Bernard.
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-12 14:19:53+00:00): Hello Mr. Derricknehrenberg  according to observation your mapping looks good so keep it up.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152586486
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-12 14:19:54+00:00): Hello Mr. Derricknehrenberg  according to observation your mapping looks good so keep it up.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152586486
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-12 13:52:46+00:00): Hello Mr. Derricknehrenberg  according to observation your mapping looks good so keep it up.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152586522
literan (2024-06-12 17:30:40+00:00): слово "деревня" лишнее
Kovoschiz (2024-08-30 12:10:58+00:00): Reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong).
Langlaeufer (2024-06-13 10:20:01+00:00): Die Straße war bereits vorhanden.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152586973
Langlaeufer (2024-06-14 07:41:08+00:00): Hallo,
bitte nicht ganze Wege auf Brücke setzen. Nur der schwebende Teil ist die Brücke. Bei den Gräben ist eher davon auszugehen, das das unterirdische Stück ein Rohr (tunnel=culvert) ist.
Grüße
Langläufer
69Z7WYGQ07 (2024-06-21 03:27:29+00:00): Comida caseira maravilhosa, bem temperada e vem muita comida
DaveF (2024-06-14 11:40:34+00:00): Hi
Please don't add 'Platform' to the ref tag, it should just be the number/letter.
jmapb (2024-06-13 12:28:06+00:00): (I also reopened the zoo!)
SomeoneElse2 (2024-06-12 14:24:57+00:00): Hello - there's a problem with the Sperrins AONB at the moment, there are some duplicate entries in the boundary.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291745514 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/343718558 are two, but there are more.
b-holdet (2024-06-13 04:36:08+00:00): Stien er beregnet til både fodgængere og cykellister. Det er en kombineret sti med blåt skilt. Du kan se mit bud på den i https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152612667
Langlaeufer (2024-06-13 10:15:17+00:00): Auch hier ist ganz deutlich ein Weg im Luftbild erkennbar
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152588620
Langlaeufer (2024-06-13 10:14:32+00:00): Das sieht jetzt sehr merkwürdig aus. Die Wegeenden schweben im Nichts. Im Luftbild sieht es auch aus, als ob da doch ein Weg wäre.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152588819
Frans S (2024-07-24 12:02:51+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong tagging and mapping buildings.
Each building need to be mapped individually.
Tagging is just building=yes. Nothing else, no names,
No layer to hide errors!

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152588906
Frans S (2024-07-24 12:05:51+00:00): BTW . Don't change the hashtags !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152588906
Langlaeufer (2024-06-13 09:35:20+00:00): Auf einem Fußweg darf man nicht reiten. horse no ist überflüssig. Fußgänger sind die vorgesehene Verkehrsart (der Wert designated ist ebenfalls bereits default. foot yes ist falsch.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152588997
NieWnen (2024-06-14 18:59:51+00:00): Relacje dla peronów: 1, 6, 8 zostały uszkodzone. 

Zostały na zewnętrznej linii, która dla multipolygony jest w roli outer. Relacje transportu publicznego powinny zawierać obiekt peronowy, który zawiera tagi, czyli w tym przypadku nie pusty way (outer), a właśnie samą relację multipolygonu peronu.

Powinno być chyba git:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152694451
eggie (2024-06-12 14:43:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
feedback  Wanneer paden nog niet geheel zijn verdwenen, maar niet meer begaanbaar zijn kun je ze beter taggen met disused:highway=path
Dat hgaat dus over paden die niet meer terug komen.
Het voorkomt opnieuw intekenen door medemappers.
Het pad staat immers met de naam Boomkruiperpad gewoon in de BGT.
.. disused:highway rendert niet meer op de kaart en is dan een aanwijzing voor een volgende mapper.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
habi (2024-06-12 14:22:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4288374
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-06-12 18:18:55+00:00): Thanks for your contribution.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152590504
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-06-12 18:12:44+00:00): Thanks for your contribution.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152590619
Percherie (2024-07-23 05:25:27+00:00): Bonjour Perin,

Je viens de découvrir cette nouvelle route cyclable. 
Je suis perturbé quand je la vois emprunter un cours d'eau sans sentier, elle est discontinue avec de grand trous et ne correspond plus à la notion de circuit cyclable 

Peut tu m'indiquer les sources sur de tes contributions ? 
Au plaisir d'échanger ensemble
Perin (2024-07-23 10:06:44+00:00): Bonjour Percherie,
Si je comprends bien, tu parles de l’itinéraire GN01 qui passe par le Rec du Veyret. Comme préciser dans la donnée itinéraire, ce parcours n'existe pas encore en tant que tel (state = proposed)  mais son tracé est arrêté et prévu dans les 3 ans à venir par l'agglomération du Grand Narbonne. Je n'ai pas mis d'aménagement sur ce trajet (sauf les existants), il ne sera donc pas pris en compte dans les calculateurs de trajet.
Je me suis inspiré de ce qui avait été réalisé pour l'Eurovelo 8 dans le sud des Pyrénées-Orientales (dans les Albères), avec un parcours prévu mais non aménagé encore récemment.
J'espère avoir répondu à tes inquiétudes :)
Raf
Percherie (2024-07-23 17:15:25+00:00): Je comprends tu a été proactif ;-) c'est que je GN02 est déjà visible sur cette carte même si c'est en proposed mais là c'est plutôt un problème de rendu

Ps il viens d'y avoir un marquage cyclable rue de Turenne qui viens de passer en sens unique. Je l'ai ajouté... peut être que c'est un bout de la GN01 ou GN02
Frans S (2024-06-17 12:55:46+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please map the individual buildings rather than a complete walled yard including buildings as 1 building.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152591277
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-13 04:05:07+00:00): hello akuksouski_lyft your mapping looks good
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152591513
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-13 04:06:16+00:00): hello akuksouski_lyft your mapping looks good
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152591849
literan (2024-06-12 17:30:14+00:00): зачем вы вносите дубли существующих адресов? рядом здание с этим номером
_klaas_ (2024-06-12 15:06:04+00:00): Sorry, falscher Änderungskommentar.
UW Krün und Zuleitungen angepasst (überwiegend tagging)
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-06-12 17:48:31+00:00): Thanks for your contribution.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152591961
KiloThree (2024-06-12 16:14:47+00:00): Looking at the plans, is this not an on-street, buffered/parking protected lane, and not a cycle track? I also thought it was only just started, and not expected to complete for 3 weeks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152591971
cubbe8 (2024-06-12 18:30:19+00:00): It is onstreet but precast kerbs will be installed. The paint is all down and currently temporary barriers are fitted.
andriu44 (2024-06-14 13:52:29+00:00): I would cut this at Exeter for now - markings flexposts were in between Hereford and Exeter; It's kind of OK Exeter to Clarendon but no flexposts. After Dartmouth though, Eversource workers were cutting into pavement (and MARKINGS! gah) in the bike lane space. It's really not even close to done yet.
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-06-12 16:48:03+00:00): Thanks for your contribution.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152591993
NieWnen (2025-01-12 16:30:24+00:00): Cześć, 
niestety te zmiany jak i prawdopodobnie kolejne (widziałem tylko kilka) są niepoprawne.
Zostały usunięte zmapowane ciągi pieszo-rowerowe jako 1 linia.

Została utracona przy okazji historia linii.

Rekomendowanym sposobem mapowania ścieżek pieszo-rowerowych jest 1 linia. Tutaj znajdziesz więcej info na ten temat:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w (lub wyżej w tabelce pod S5)

Edytor id niestety tego nie wspiera jeśli chodzi o szablony. Trzeba manualnie edytować tagi.
Teremys (2024-10-28 09:35:55+00:00): Bonjour, 
Serait il possible de remettre les tags "name" et "smoothness" supprimés des éléments quais lors de cette modification ? 
Merci d'avance.
dieterdreist (2024-06-23 00:31:20+00:00): "85 pal.3" doesn't seem to be an addr:housenumber.
MxxCon (2024-06-18 01:59:19+00:00): Hello.
Why did you delete highway=crossing here? With out this tag this is an incomplete object.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152592341
VLD277 (2024-06-18 21:35:16+00:00): Hi MxxCon, 
The highway=crossing tag here was initially removed based on guidance from the informal crossings OSM wiki page.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing=informal?uselang=en When taking a 2nd look at this one, I found a lowered curb so I went ahead and changed it back to an unmarked crossing in this case. Thanks for reaching out