piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisReview (2025-03-23 07:47:09+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
NeisReview (2025-03-23 08:06:07+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
nafetsw (2025-03-24 14:20:41+00:00): Hallo, zur Info: der Link zum Foto für Weg 674680977 (Nähe Försterloch) funktioniert nicht. Grüße
Weltenschummler (2025-03-25 13:54:09+00:00): Moin! Danke für die Nachricht. Ich kann das Bild ohne Probleme öffnen. Gruß
nafetsw (2025-03-27 15:35:01+00:00): der request https://d2exd72xrrp1s7.cloudfront.net/www/9y/9yeayhobaqpr1i6n6d27rct9u5bpc37uw-p558415021-full/195bf6d9ca7?width=3072&height=2304&crop=false&q=70 liefert eine 404 zurück. Wenn du dort etwas anderes siehst, bist du evtl noch angemeldet? schon mal cookies gelöscht? sind die Links zu den Bildern eigentlich von Dauer? VG
Weltenschummler (2025-03-27 19:51:39+00:00): Moin! Habe mal probehalber meine Cookies gelöscht. Ich bin auch nirgendwo angemeldet. Das Bild sehe ich immer noch problemlos. Ich habe auf gleiche Weise viele andere Bilder hochgeladen. Kannst du, beispielsweise mein Bild zum Aussichtspunkt vom Alten Wildenstein (Standort: 50,9232612, 14,2434243) sehen? Oder funktioniert nur dieses eine Bild nicht? Gruß
nafetsw (2025-03-28 09:29:54+00:00): Moin, ja alle anderen Fotos aus dem Changeset hier und auch das auf dem alten Wildenstein funktionieren. naja keine Ahnung, dann isses halt so. Hauptsache die Links bleiben auch länger gültig und sind nicht in ein paar Monaten weg. Dann hätte das nicht so viel Mehrwert. Grüße
Weltenschummler (2025-03-28 09:31:41+00:00): Das sollte nicht passieren. Die Bilder vom Alten Wildenstein sind ja auch schon eine ganze Weile online. Gruß
nafetsw (2025-03-28 09:41:04+00:00): hmm komisch, im Chrome funktionierts das Bild bei mir, nur im Firefox nicht. Obwohl alle anderen Links im Firefox angezeigt werden. Ich denke, dann ist das Problem zu vernachlässigen..
rskedgell (2025-03-25 16:13:47+00:00): Although it would duplicate locked:conditional, would it be worth adding foot=permissive (?) + foot:conditional=no @ (...) for data consumers which are only aware of access tags?
okwithmydecay (2025-03-27 17:11:35+00:00): Good point, feel free to update accordingly
rskedgell (2025-03-27 17:55:20+00:00): Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164175528
Benny21815 (2025-03-25 19:41:41+00:00): These were made because the map is not updated for 2025. Some of the fairways are now out of date again
b-jazz (2025-03-29 06:24:53+00:00): Benny, did you read the Keep_the_history wiki page mentioned above? You are doing a lot of damage by wholesale deleting elements and recreating them. You need to make more of a effort to reuse existing elements and move their nodes around. This is especially important when dealing with elements that are part of relations. If you don't understand how to deal with multipolygons, you'll need to read up on those as well.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-29 07:02:12+00:00): I reached out to them via private message since they don't read or respond to changeset comments.
I wish changeset comments notified users similar to unread private messages.
b-jazz (2025-03-30 16:45:29+00:00): Interesting. I didn't realize there were separate notification prefs for those two types of communications. I get emails for both, so I assumed everyone else does as well.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-30 20:22:49+00:00): It does send emails but lots of people don't monitor their emails.
I was referring to the notification by the profile picture in osm.org
CurlingMan13 (2025-07-04 07:21:56+00:00): If you resolved the note, shouldn't it be marked as resolved too?
DawsZed (2025-07-04 13:30:44+00:00): I did resolve the note at the time, but it was reopened by Daitruxdd shortly after.
dadavid (2025-05-06 00:25:14+00:00): vielen Dank fürs Reparieren :) 

weiterhin happy mapping 

David
PostaMap_Infinite (2025-03-23 00:17:16+00:00): So I used JOSM with a filter set to (building=yes), inverted to only show features with that tagging.

Then, I used my knowledge on how neighborhoods are usually laid out around here, to find areas with multiple features that seemed like neighborhoods. 

I used areal imagery to prove that I did, in fact, find neighborhoods, and used the lasso tool to select only the elements of the neighborhood that looked like houses.

Then I: [shift] + [e]'d to select only the ways, and not the individual nodes, and converted the tags!

This was a long, and tiring process, and even though I took good care as to select only the houses as best as possible, I might have made a few mistakes.

If you think I made a mistake or want to reach out, don't hesitate! Talk to me on Slack, through OSM Messaging, or just leave a comment here. I'm happy to explain!
PostaMap_Infinite (2025-03-23 00:17:45+00:00): So I used JOSM with a filter set to (building=yes), inverted to only show features with that tagging.

Then, I used my knowledge on how neighborhoods are usually laid out around here, to find areas with multiple features that seemed like neighborhoods. 

I used areal imagery to prove that I did, in fact, find neighborhoods, and used the lasso tool to select only the elements of the neighborhood that looked like houses.

Then I: [shift] + [e]'d to select only the ways, and not the individual nodes, and converted the tags!

This was a long, and tiring process, and even though I took good care as to select only the houses as best as possible, I might have made a few mistakes.

If you think I made a mistake or want to reach out, don't hesitate! Talk to me on Slack, through OSM Messaging, or just leave a comment here. I'm happy to explain!
eggie (2025-03-23 11:37:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisReview (2025-03-23 08:07:56+00:00): #NameChanges

Hi, welcome to OSM.

In the past 12 hours, you have made numerous name changes across various changesets. This included modifying names as well as removing other name:*. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.

You can find an overview of the recent changesets at the following link: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=22570300
StreetSurveyor (2025-05-26 22:04:24+00:00): These should be unnamed driveways. The name of the apartment complex doesn’t mean that’s the street name.
NeisReview (2025-03-23 08:08:35+00:00): #NameChanges

Hi, welcome to OSM.

In the past 12 hours, you have made numerous name changes across various changesets. This included modifying names as well as removing other name:*. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.

You can find an overview of the recent changesets at the following link: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=22570300
NeisReview (2025-03-23 08:11:46+00:00): #DeletionsCheck

Hi, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed many of your changes in this set involve deletions.

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-27 22:06:47+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164185067
mueschel (2025-03-24 10:48:57+00:00): Please check your upload routine. 20,000 "gpx:ele=0.0" tags are useless and should not be uploaded. 
The amount of nodes also suggests that these are coming from an external source and not from a "survey"?
Jbensman (2025-03-24 16:12:13+00:00): They are USGS data, the same data on the National Topo Map option on the standard editor.  I thought we were supposed to select one of the drop down options.  But I have started putting the site it is coming from: https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/6798da21d34ea8c18376e77f

I thought I had it all figured out and everything looks good on the rendered map and in OSMAnd.  But last night I figured out something was weird.  I was going to mess with it tonight and see if I can figure it out. 

I downloaded all the hydrology for the country in a geodatabase and am using QGIS to export the streams in gpx.  Do you know a way to use a GDB or shap file without converting to GPX?  There are so many options on a GPX file and it is hard to tell which ones to use.  I suspect it is a GPX setting, but could it be JOSM?  Any suggestion on helping figure out what is causing it?

Thanks
mueschel (2025-03-24 16:43:55+00:00): If this is an import, you need to follow the OSM Import Guidelines:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

On the page you linked I couldn't find a license for this data. Are you sure the data is compatible with the requirements of OSM and ODbL?
Jbensman (2025-03-24 18:47:15+00:00): I am having a hard time understanding them.  The data says "All the data is open and non-proprietary."  The exact data is in the default editor under the "USGS National Map"  So if it is there does not that mean it is OK to use?  Instead of tracing it, I am importing the lines.
mueschel (2025-03-24 18:52:33+00:00): Tracing and copying are different things, and both might be fine or not. The import process is there to find out about such differences before beginning the import.
Jbensman (2025-03-24 20:49:07+00:00): Like I said I am having a really hard time figuring this all out.  Is this the required approval for the data: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:National_Hydrography_Dataset The data I am using is the data they say the NHD is being replaced with.  Thanks for helping me figure this out!
Jbensman (2025-03-24 22:07:23+00:00): I have the problem with the tags figured out.  In JOSM I selected all and deleted the tag.  Took a few seconds.  I saved the set to make sure it fixed the problem.  But I will stop importing the data until I can figure out if it is OK.  Like I said I really appreciate your help!
NeisReview (2025-03-23 08:11:26+00:00): #DeletionsCheck

Hi, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed many of your changes in this set involve deletions.

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.
NeisReview (2025-03-23 08:21:42+00:00): #DeletionsCheck

Hi, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed many of your changes in this set involve deletions.

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-27 22:06:48+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164185067
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 04:30:48+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164574320
joost schouppe (2025-05-06 09:17:59+00:00): Hoi abstract,
Ik ga de name alvast terugzetten, dit is immers de naam die de luchthaven voor zichzelf gebruikt.
Waarom heb je hier ook telefoon en wikidata gewist?
kabelhaai (2025-05-06 12:39:31+00:00): De wikidata zal per ongeluk gebeurd zijn want dat is niet de bedoeling.

Ik wou in eerste instantie de officiele naam "Brussels-Nationaal" in het Engels toevoegen en dat staat er nog altijd. All good.
NeisReview (2025-03-23 08:14:11+00:00): #HighwayChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

In this changeset, some types of highway are being added or modified by you. 

Could we know the sources that you used? Thank you.

More information about the changeset: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163969096
ALEXANDRE KREISLER (2025-03-24 18:02:11+00:00): Eu moro aqui, e coloquei em evidências as principais vias de fluxo de veículos. Sendo assim essas vias interligam bairros e servem de corredores principais.

Translated by GOOGLE:

I live here, and I highlighted the main traffic routes. These routes connect neighborhoods and serve as main corridors.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-28 12:36:23+00:00): What "Taller Tarrabé" means? Are there really 30+ car repair workshops, each named "Taller Tarrabé"?
silversurfer83 (2025-03-23 09:16:54+00:00): Greetings,

you recently made some edits that cover several countries and this one here has a bounding box from SE Australia to the northern wastes of Canada. These kind of edits are harder to review and they clutter the filters of people trying to keep an eye on their immediate sourroudings.

Please read
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

and try to keep edits more focused. Thank you and happy mapping
TheMonroeMapper (2025-03-23 09:25:53+00:00): Hi, I'm well aware of the wiki page in question and the suggestions there. In this case, only 14 items were edited, and it would have taken an unreasonable amount of extra effort to needlessly split this changeset.
silversurfer83 (2025-03-23 09:41:15+00:00): As mentioned above this isn't the only large bbox in your recent edit history. I wouldn't have mentioned it if it was a one off.

As it was only meant as a reminder I can only leave you with wishes for a pleasant sunday :)
gurglypipe (2025-03-24 22:01:27+00:00): > it would have taken an unreasonable amount of extra effort to needlessly split this changeset.

With JOSM, that would only mean selecting subsets of the 14 items and using ‘upload selection’, it’s not much effort.
TheMonroeMapper (2025-03-24 22:10:54+00:00): Your opinions have been noted. Please note that I'm unsubscribing from this thread.
Sakari_N (2025-03-28 15:11:27+00:00): I don't think splitting 14 objects into 4 changesets would really qualify for "an unreasonable amount of extra effort" though
j2nic (2025-03-23 03:12:29+00:00): I meant to put source as survey.
CurlingMan13 (2025-03-27 20:36:21+00:00): If you know the building is going to be used and appears as a medical building, you should just tag it as such rather than a generic building.  It isn't like the building is going to magically transform to something new.
DawsZed (2025-03-29 14:59:06+00:00): Haha fair, I'll update the tags, I was just worried people might start driving to this place if I tagged it with more detail, but I guess there can be other tags to prevent that too, thank you.
liatris (2025-04-09 13:35:50+00:00): @Cubbe8, can you help me understand which of my edits were incorrect here? Routing with RideWithGPS does not work properly through this neighborhood and what I saw on OSM does not match what I see biking through and through satellite. I followed the instructions provided on the OSM tag pages as best I could.
jm428 (2025-03-23 02:51:57+00:00): This didn't revert the changes to the parking lot for some reason so I am reverting this revert.
jm428 (2025-03-23 03:10:34+00:00): Update: I ended up redoing the revert because the other changes in this changeset weren't correct. I fixed the parking lot manually.
jm428 (2025-03-23 03:12:08+00:00): typo in my changeset comment. Meant to say: "Will manually change the tags so that it won't be labelled as grass."
PostaMap_Infinite (2025-03-23 03:35:08+00:00): So I used JOSM with a filter set to (building=yes), inverted to only show features with that tagging.

Then, I used my knowledge on how neighborhoods are usually laid out around here, to find areas with multiple features that seemed like neighborhoods.

I used areal imagery to prove that I did, in fact, find neighborhoods, and used the lasso tool to select only the elements of the neighborhood that looked like houses.

Then I: [shift] + [e]'d to select only the ways, and not the individual nodes, and converted the tags!

This was a long, and tiring process, and even though I took good care as to select only the houses as best as possible, I might have made a few mistakes.

If you think I made a mistake or want to reach out, don't hesitate! Talk to me on Slack, through OSM Messaging, or just leave a comment here. I'm happy to explain!
PostaMap_Infinite (2025-03-23 03:35:43+00:00): So I used JOSM with a filter set to (building=yes), inverted to only show features with that tagging.

Then, I used my knowledge on how neighborhoods are usually laid out around here, to find areas with multiple features that seemed like neighborhoods.

I used areal imagery to prove that I did, in fact, find neighborhoods, and used the lasso tool to select only the elements of the neighborhood that looked like houses.

Then I: [shift] + [e]'d to select only the ways, and not the individual nodes, and converted the tags!

This was a long, and tiring process, and even though I took good care as to select only the houses as best as possible, I might have made a few mistakes.

If you think I made a mistake or want to reach out, don't hesitate! Talk to me on Slack, through OSM Messaging, or just leave a comment here. I'm happy to explain!
NeisReview (2025-03-23 08:22:53+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
Froglegseternal (2025-03-23 18:33:54+00:00): there was an issue popping up saying smth about how the two polygons were intersecting that I was trying to resolve. As for the source, like I said in the edit notes, local knowledge - i have been there.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 00:59:48+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164747018
t_ja (2025-03-23 09:03:26+00:00): Thank you for reverting this mess 👍
martinst (2025-03-23 05:44:37+00:00): name=* ist nur für Eigennamen vorgesehen. 
description=* würde sich besser eignen.
nevw (2025-03-23 21:47:08+00:00): Hi, the Hastings Hotel has an invalid multipolygon. Outer rings in mp cannot share sides. You can map as two separate buildings or use the building:part method
BlumleinPear (2025-03-24 02:26:00+00:00): Thanks, fixed.
Fraxi (2025-03-23 10:29:31+00:00): Трябва да е Buxton?! :P
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buxton_Brothers_Boulevard
Dimitar155 (2025-03-23 13:00:20+00:00): Благодаря за корекцията, наистина се пише с "ux". Промених и имената на булеварда, за да са по същия начин.
GeeMaps! (2025-09-18 04:48:38+00:00): Hi waratah65. Just spotted a Note questioning this name, as apparently not official, so wondering what your source was? Thanks!
Kovoschiz (2025-03-23 07:11:55+00:00): Maps.me spam, wrong `shop=` and coords https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15079293
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 06:44:12+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164576198
橘ヒカリ (2025-03-25 23:56:26+00:00): Reverted in 164101064
橘ヒカリ (2025-03-26 00:01:18+00:00): 您好，感谢您对中国铁路数据做出的贡献，但不幸的是，客运/货运里程表上的信息以及里程不符合On the ground原则，各类铁路信息请以工务段实际数据为准，请勿参考车务/运营单位对铁路线路/车站的命名以及里程。您近日对于车站里程的错误编辑已全部回退。

此致

敬礼
DDD丶Samuel (2025-03-26 14:58:52+00:00): 不好意思，我也是模仿你的格式增加了车站里程，正好手里有客里表和专刊
DDD丶Samuel (2025-03-26 15:00:44+00:00): 我也不懂两个里程不一样
橘ヒカリ (2025-03-25 17:58:08+00:00): 您好，里程中请不要出现“线”，正确写法是 railway:position:exact:南夏宋联络=xxx.xxx

谢谢！
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 04:30:49+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164574320
HomeUA (2025-03-23 17:29:11+00:00): Ти нащо видалив ринок?
worldqafix (2025-03-28 13:46:59+00:00): Помилився. 
Бачу вже відновлений, дякую.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-23 07:20:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11653360103
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12692510257

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Capillum (2025-03-23 07:58:09+00:00): dziękuję za merytoryczny komentarz, poprawione!
s777n (2025-03-26 15:00:55+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста не добавляйте личные заметки в OpenStreetMap
JassKurn (2025-03-23 18:54:19+00:00): Hi joynton.

In OSM we use the building= tag to record the presence of a building, and the physical type/architecture of the building.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building

So the building should still be 
building=church
But, I think that was wrong as it appears the structure is a chapel so the tag should be
building=chapel

A different use for a building can be tagged with building:use=. In this case
building:use=residential
jpoynton (2025-03-23 19:05:46+00:00): Got it
Stalker61 (2025-03-23 09:23:58+00:00): :) Год конечно 2017
FinalSpeedZ (2025-03-23 07:57:17+00:00): #DAT401M
Stalker61 (2025-03-23 09:23:37+00:00): :) Год конечно 2017
Stalker61 (2025-03-23 09:24:27+00:00): :) Год конечно 2017
Stalker61 (2025-03-23 09:25:00+00:00): :) Год конечно 2017
BubbaJuice (2025-04-04 01:10:12+00:00): Thanks for contributing!
Stalker61 (2025-03-23 09:25:15+00:00): :) Год конечно 2017
Stalker61 (2025-03-23 09:25:37+00:00): :) Год конечно 2017
Stalker61 (2025-03-23 09:25:50+00:00): :) Год конечно 2017
SpinOff (2025-03-23 20:43:08+00:00): Hej. Nie łącz obszarów landuse z obiektami innego typu, takimi jak budynki i drogi, tak jak zrobiłeś to tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1370484172

Utrudnia to edycję mapy i może być podstawą do wycofania takiej zmiany.
FajrAl (2025-06-19 00:34:30+00:00): You forgot to add "natural=coastline," the island sunk. LOL.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 00:59:49+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164747018
dpolovinkin (2025-05-28 21:13:06+00:00): а вы не заметили что поломали дорогу на большом и у вас предупреждения которые вы проигнорировали?) что за вандализм по факту?...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/763019501
dpolovinkin (2025-05-28 21:14:22+00:00): точнее рядом с большим
dpolovinkin (2025-05-28 21:18:51+00:00): я сделал нормально, но в будущем не игнорируйте плиз предупреждения что у вас в редакторе явно высвечиваются при сохранении изменений
CDB77 (2025-03-23 09:23:59+00:00): Many thanks, I changed "library" with "bookshop", since it is a bookshop in reality ("librairie" in French)
Lejun (2025-03-24 17:56:15+00:00): My bad, was still half asleep!
Durek1993 (2025-03-23 10:57:31+00:00): Hallo 5R-MFT,
du hast bei deinen Änderungen auch den POI verschoben. Die Eisdielerin befindet sich in Haus-Nr. 402 und nicht 408. Bitte wieder die ursprünglichen Koordinaten verwenden.
5R-MFT (2025-03-23 11:42:18+00:00): Lt der Webseite ist die in 408. Wenn am PC kann ich soe später aber verschieben.
Durek1993 (2025-03-23 11:48:55+00:00): Danke dir. Wo hattest du denn die 408 auf der Webseite gefunden? Auf der Startseite und dem Impressum steht bei mir 402: https://www.eisdielerin.de/impressum/
5R-MFT (2025-03-23 12:07:46+00:00): Ups dann habe ich mich wohl verguckt. Hatte beim ergänzen der Webseite  die 408 im Kopf. Habe es wieder auf die 402 gesetzt. Gut das es gleich gefunden hast.
eggie (2025-03-23 11:38:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
TrickyFoxy (2025-03-23 22:24:05+00:00): Л.1009 это номер ЛЭП? Или скоращение Линия 1009?