piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SekeRob (2024-03-23 07:36:36+00:00): Hi,

Vi prego controlla l'edificio che hai importato con MapWithAI e verifica nelle immagini satellitari se la sagoma corrisponde alla realtà, p.e.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1265041253
Questo problema si presenta con ogni singolo edificio preso da MWA e lo stesso vale per le vie. Devi correggere ogni singolo elemento.

ciao
giorgio92 (2024-03-28 08:31:59+00:00): Ciao, ti confermo che tutte le sagome degli edifici sono controllate prima di accettarle
azakh-world (2024-03-23 20:30:35+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Чтобы ещё больше помочь проекту, Вы можете вносить адреса в OSM с Публичной Кадастровой карты https://pkk.rosreestr.ru/

С уважением,
Алексей
trigpoint (2024-03-27 17:49:36+00:00): Well the spelling was correct before this and close to 200 others where tag-fiddled away, https://taghistory.raifer.tech/?#***/display/analogue

The tagging language of OSM is British English, or standard English so we should not be changing a correct spelling to American English, or Simplified English as we call it.

In my day job, as an Electronic Engineer, I would never use an Americanism such as Analog in a document.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-27 18:49:56+00:00): https://taghistory.raifer.tech/?#***/display/analogue&***/display/analog - if display=analog is wrong and not preferable then it is still possible to discuss it and deprecate that tag with 13 000 uses
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-27 18:51:29+00:00): Also, if there is an actual support for keeping both versions I can roll back these edits
NeisBot (2024-03-24 12:40:43+00:00): Hello robibrojek, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments \n
Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Dawid2849 (2024-03-22 22:26:21+00:00): Jeszcze highway:category:pl i relacje są do posprzątania ;)
ale ogólnie to dobra robota
SomeoneElse (2024-03-23 10:29:35+00:00): Given that you're only replacing one value here It'd be much better if instead of just "fixing unusual departures_board values with a clear replacement" you actually said what you were changing.
It saves people having to hunt through the actual previous values you changed.
Failing to do this is making life harder for consumers of OSM data.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-26 14:49:19+00:00): Would it be also useful to split edits where I would modify several values into separate edits, each for separate value?

To me it seems that editing one key and clearly listing it is good enough (and better than typical description) but I can further split edits.

But it seems to me of that is really needed then it should be done for all edits, not only for ones coincidentally editing a single value
ivanbranco (2024-03-23 14:18:36+00:00): Ciao Angelo, qual é la fonte di queste modifiche? E di quale progetto fanno parte?
René84828 (2025-11-06 16:14:39+00:00): Auf den StreetView-Aufnahmen von Juni 2025 ist hier keine befahrbare Mitte zu erkennen.
eggie (2024-03-22 20:23:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

De info heb van het gebouw gehaald. Het hoort op de adresnode. De info van die adresnode heb ik samengevoegd met de BAG adresnode.
Vreemd dat de adresnode de Hollandse naam heeft 'weg'
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Robin Thrush (2024-03-22 20:57:17+00:00): Dankjewel voor de aanwijzingen.
Als ik de adresnode bekijk dan staat daar als huisnummer 42T.
Is die 'T' een vergissing of is dat een of andere codering?
Ik heb ook de naam van de timmerschuur er afgehaald zoals je voorstelde.
MVG
lidaxs
eggie (2024-03-22 21:02:23+00:00): Daglidaxs..
Meestal slaan die adrescodes op transformatorhuisjes. 
Zou dat kunnen?
In Nederland heeft alles een adres. 

Mvg
eggie
Robin Thrush (2024-03-22 21:08:50+00:00): Ik denk dat je daar gelijk in hebt.
Het is dus zaak om goed in de gaten te houden wat voor type object je aan het bewerken bent.

MVG
lidaxs
eggie (2024-03-22 21:13:30+00:00): 👍
Jordi MF (2024-03-23 20:17:46+00:00): Hola inode,

¿No tuviste problemas para pasar por este camino? Había una cadena y una familia que vivía allí y que me dijo que era propiedad privada.
Saludos.
inode64 (2024-03-25 19:07:32+00:00): Si, vi varias cadenas. Nosotros veníamos del sendero que venía de la antigua finca de Bicoca , y no tuvimos problemas. Si que tenían toda su parcela vallada, parecían un estercolero el maset. 
Igualmente si ves el catastro, se ve claramente un camino. No pueden apropiarse de los caminos. Y da acceso a otras fincas (ya no se si son todas suyas), pero los caminos son públicos.
Jordi MF (2024-03-25 19:21:35+00:00): Genial. Me parece bien que lo tengas claro. Yo no lo tenía tanto. Y aunque al final me dejaron pasar, habiendo perros y yendo solo, no me sentí seguro.

Saludos
neuhausr (2024-04-10 22:20:13+00:00): Hi, noticed this changeset where you're tracing landuse right to the edge of the street. I don't think from a landuse (how it's actually sense it is usually very accurate to do that. The part between sidewalk and road is generally right-of-way anyway and owned by the government. Wonder if you'd consider keeping landuse inside the sidewalks in most cases? Thanks!
ablevi202 (2024-04-12 01:04:39+00:00): I dont think its wrong to stop landuse at the curb, it makes the most sense to me to have whats between the roads as a distinct landuse block. I don't have anything against stopping at sidewalks I just think curbs is easier and simpler.
silversurfer83 (2024-03-22 21:05:27+00:00): Sorry, aber das meiste sieht wieder extrem nach privater Notiz aus.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149030810
Frans S (2024-03-23 10:45:15+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149028250
alzk (2024-03-23 11:38:52+00:00): Thank you so much for your helpful review, and for the learning resources!
eggie (2024-03-22 20:24:51+00:00): Wanneer de naam Timmerschuur is dan is het oke, maar wanneer het de functie is dan alleen description gebruiken.
gr eggie
joel56dt (2024-03-24 18:57:50+00:00): Hi keithonearth,

Thanks for the great additions, as always. Just one point I want to discuss: the coastline.

The wiki says the coastline should be mapped to follow the mean high-water springs line. I have typically used the flotsam in the aerial imagery to determine where this is but I noticed you lowered the coastline to be below the flotsam.

Is this intentional? If so, can you help me understand why?

Thanks,
joel56dt
keithonearth (2024-05-08 04:51:17+00:00): Sorry not to see your message until now, Joel. 

I also understand that the mean highest high tide line is the best one to use for the coastline. 

That said, I do think there is generally some beach between this line and where the terrestrial plants start, and if there are too many overlapping features they obscure each other in many renderings. I don't think we can say with total accuracy from the imagery where the mean spring high-water line is, so spreading the coastline and the highest point of beach may or may not be technically accurate, but allows users to see the info better.  Many renderings make the fact that there is a beach impossible to see, if it is entirely below the coast line. 

I think it is more useful to take my approach, to keep things clear, and I hope my approach is ok.
gscscnd (2024-03-23 13:37:37+00:00): Narysowałeś nową drogę, nie zlikwidowałeś przejazdu. Poprawiłem:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149051172
phodgkin (2025-08-17 12:18:20+00:00): I don't think changing the Hawthorn-Ryhope way to `highway=bridleway` was correct. It is not legally a bridleway. It best described as a multi-user path:
https://www.durham.gov.uk/article/3691/Railway-paths
The previous tagging of `highway=path` with appropriate access tags looked fine to me.
You could also argue for `highway=cycleway` + `foot=yes` + `horse=yes`. Either way, I don't think `designated` is correct since these railway paths are not public rights of ways and Durham County Council could change the access arrangements.
Alec Coates (2025-08-17 14:20:32+00:00): It is a 'bridleway' because it is intended for use by horse riders. A path doesn't need to be a 'public bridleway' (legal right of way) to be tagged as a bridleway.
See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbridleway

As for access tagging, [foot/horse]=designated is correct over [foot/horse]=yes, because 'designated' means there is signage indicating it is for use by those modes, whereas 'yes' means there is a legal right of way.
See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Alec Coates (2025-08-17 14:22:59+00:00): If the bridleway was also public bridleway, it should also have the tag designation=public_bridleway

Hope this helps.
phodgkin (2025-08-18 09:04:14+00:00): I agree with most of this but the definition of a bridleway is that it is primarily intended for use by horse riders, rather than just a way on which horse riding is allowed. Most UK bridleways are not suitable for riding a normal bike (not least because they often go through fords), but this is a multiuser path designed to be cycle friendly. For a map user, it is much more informative that this shows up as "cycleway blue" on the standard map  rather than "bridleway green".
Alec Coates (2025-08-18 12:55:05+00:00): Bridleways are primarily for horse riders AND pedestrians, not just horse riders.

Just because some bridleways may be unsuitable for bicycles doesn't mean that it should be avoided as a way type. If you wish to convey that a way is suitability surfaced, consider adding
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype
tags to the way.

Changing tags just so the path appears blue on a specific renderer is 'tagging for the renderer' which is frowned upon. Other cycling specific renderers such as CyclOSM already render it as blue based on the surface type.
phodgkin (2025-08-18 16:56:02+00:00): I  agree that suitability for bicycles is not a deciding factor for the suitability of of highway=bridleway. But this isn't the question; the question is whether a multi-user path intended for pedestrians / cycles / horses / wheelchairs is best tagged as a bridleway.

The accusation of tagging for the renderer is unfair - this implies using incorrect tagging to get a specific effect. The original tagging (not mine) was not incorrect. CyclOSM has an easy job, since it ignores the horse access tags. The interpretation of tags by Carto is more relevant since it needs to consider them all.
Here `highway=path` + `bicycle=designated` is rendered as `highway=cycleway` THEN (as a lower priority) `highway=path` + `horse=designated` is rendered as a bridleway, whether a way is intended for bicycles is a key factor.

Anyway, we are clearly not going to agree, so I'll open an issue on the UK Community Discussion Board.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/uk/86
Alec Coates (2025-08-20 21:35:21+00:00): Apologies, I wasn't try to accuse you of anything. I just disagree with the assessment, opening a community discussion seems like a sensible move.
marc__marc (2024-04-26 15:24:23+00:00): Bonjour,
est-ce bien eCharge ?
ne serrais-ce pas plutôt IECharge ?
Cordialement,
Marc
jbcharron (2024-04-26 21:01:46+00:00): Bonsoir Marc,
J'avais repris les infos d'une notes.
Mais c'est possible que j'ai fais une erreur ou que la note était incomplète.
N'hésitez pas à rectifier
Bonne soirée :)
dmfr (2024-04-03 15:52:11+00:00): Boas! No Jardim de Infância do Feijó (way 5863089551), a morada tem addr:place e addr:street ao mesmo tempo, que é contra as recomendações de mapeamento de moradas no OSM. Se a escola tiver addr:street, não precisa de addr:place, uma vez que addr:place é usado nas aldeias em que as ruas não têm nome, então as casas são numeradas de forma única nessa aldeia.
CaldeiraG (2024-04-04 07:16:20+00:00): Boas, já vou alterar e obrigado pela dica! O addr:place foi adicionado num import mais antigo pelo o que se manifesta em 60+ nodes. https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Jul
matix849 (2024-04-04 16:27:09+00:00): Chyba ta zmiana przedwczesna...
https://ct24.ceskatelevize.cz/clanek/regiony/dalnice-d11-na-trutnovsku-je-bez-zhotovitele-vyber-budimexu-zrusil-antimonopolni-urad-347827
charl3s (2024-04-04 17:18:36+00:00): Na zdjęciach z sentinela widać rozkopany teren
charl3s (2024-04-04 17:21:23+00:00): https://apps.sentinel-hub.com/eo-browser/?zoom=15&lat=50.67242&lng=15.96109&themeId=DEFAULT-THEME&visualizationUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fservices.sentinel-hub.com%2Fogc%2Fwms%2Fbd86bcc0-f318-402b-a145-015f85b9427e&datasetId=S2L2A&fromTime=2024-03-30T00%3A00%3A00.000Z&toTime=2024-03-30T23%3A59%3A59.999Z&layerId=1_TRUE_COLOR&demSource3D=%22MAPZEN%22
charl3s (2024-04-04 17:21:41+00:00): Może w czechach jakoś inaczej się bduuje, nie wiem
matix849 (2024-04-04 19:17:19+00:00): To co widać z Sentinela to pozostałości po pracach archeologicznych z zeszłego roku: https://czadrow24.pl/ruszyly-prace-budowlane-na-odcinku-autostrady-d11-w-kralovcu
Docelowa budowa drogi nadal nie ruszyła.
azakh-world (2024-03-22 22:36:01+00:00): Hi.
Was it a mistake to remove the route=construction tag from metro Line 15 route? Can't find any news about the line opening.

Best regards,
Alexey
Karsten Natebus (2024-03-24 10:36:39+00:00): Hallo, Du hast hier Wege mit der Begründung gelöscht: ...führen nicht weiter.
Warum? Diese Wege führen weiter, ich bin diese selber abgefefahren und sie existieren. Wenn sie tatsächlich nicht weiter führen würden, warum setzt Du dann nicht den Tag 'noexit = yes'?
Hier ein Foto, eines von Dir gelöschten Weges.
Gruß Karsten
I1ezSwFsC3X-Xql (2024-03-25 20:24:13+00:00): Hallo Karsten, ich war am Freitag dort. Der linke Weg wurde am Anfang vermutlich absichtlich durch Bäume blockiert, wenn man über die drüber steigt, folgen weitere umgestürzte Bäume. Außerdem ist er recht matschig und am Ende, bis dahin wo ich gekommen bin, kreuzt ein Wasserlauf den Weg und er ist deutlich Zugewachsen. Beim rechten Weg sieht es recht ähnlich aus. Auch wieder mehrere umgestürzte Bäume, sehr matschig und am Ende deutlich zugewachsen, so das man den weiteren Wegverlauf nicht erkennen kann. Beide Wege sind im jetzigen Zustand nicht befahrbar! Zu Fuß geht es vieleicht.
Gruß
Matthias
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-03-25 18:44:40+00:00): There are actually 11 spaces, fixed it.
Enock4seth (2024-03-22 20:42:01+00:00): Hi, I noticed you are adding multiple landuse = grassland, which does not seem to exist. Are you just adding based on what is RapiD? e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972137305
randomnumber (2024-03-22 20:46:54+00:00): didn't add that grassland, but must have accidentally done a small edit when working nearby. i agree that grassland does not make sense, and actually considered deleting.
Enock4seth (2024-04-05 11:29:53+00:00): Hi,
How did you come up feature names here? Any other map you are using as a reference? Kindly clarify.
randomnumber (2024-04-05 17:26:29+00:00): Various online maps, cross referenced with geotagged photos and video of the region. 

For example, there are 78 photos confirming the location of the cemetery: https://www.google.com/maps/place/Twenedurase+Cemetery/@6.6041096,-0.7822632,3a,75y,90t/data=!3m8!1e2!3m6!1sAF1QipMTf1mnddl-_7Hc9T7n4oA_JOnX3E40n0-BDSmq!2e10!3e12!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipMTf1mnddl-_7Hc9T7n4oA_JOnX3E40n0-BDSmq%3Dw152-h86-k-no!7i1920!8i1080!4m15!1m7!3m6!1s0xfd93b6982a74d41:0xa4d425ee4b51a5ed!2sTwenedurase-kwahu+signpost!8m2!3d6.6012516!4d-0.7785561!16s%2Fg%2F11t61qvy63!3m6!1s0xfd93b109cf09785:0xab10f8d7827eb4f6!8m2!3d6.6040312!4d-0.782512!10e5!16s%2Fg%2F11t6071cjp?entry=ttu
Enock4seth (2024-04-05 20:47:13+00:00): Hi, Thanks for the clarification but I am afraid we cannot use or add data from copyrighted sources to OpenStreetMap. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ#Can_I_trace_data_from_Google_Maps/Nokia_Maps/...? 

Are you able to point out or delete all data you have added from such sources?
randomnumber (2024-04-06 00:20:02+00:00): No copyright was infringed. Nothing was traced. Location information was derived from a variety of online sources. Google does not assert a copyright in photos users upload to the website. If they did it would say copyright Google. It does not, it say photos may be subject to copyright.  Again, I am not tracing, I am not harvesting from Google. I am doing what I said, synthesizing *a variety of sources.*

For example, if I watch this video and learn the location of various institution throughout the towns that are passed through in the video there is no copyright infringement whatsoever: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29hQxXUv61Q&t=218s

Refer to the terms of the Google Maps user license:

(c) No Creating Content From Google Maps Content. Customer will not create content based on Google Maps Content. For example, Customer will not: (i) trace or digitize roadways, building outlines, utility posts, or electrical lines from the Maps JavaScript API Satellite base map type; (ii) create 3D building models from 45° Imagery from Maps JavaScript API; (iii) build terrain models based on elevation values from the Elevation API; (iv) use latitude/longitude values from the Places API as an input for point-in-polygon analysis; (v) construct an index of tree locations within a city from Street View imagery; or (vi) convert text-based driving times into synthesized speech results.
randomnumber (2024-04-06 00:40:55+00:00): Here's an example. Say I am exploring Google Maps one day and discover that there is a cemetery on the south side of Tweneduase. Some other time, I watch a video driving of a person driving through Tweneduase and confirm that there is a cemetery on the south side of Tweneduase. Later that week I see photos of headstones geotagged near the south side of Tweneduase. Later that month I talk to family member from the area and she confirms from her personal knowledge that there is a cemetery on the south side of Tweneduase. This content is not created based on Google Maps. I may have been made aware of a fact by Google Maps and subsequently confirmed that fact with user generated material to which Google does not hold a copyright. Under your overly strict interpretation I could not buy a newspaper which refers to a "cemetery on the south side Tweneduase" and subsequently map it because I initially became aware of this fact from a copyrighted newspaper article. I do not and will not harvest data in violation of EULA.
Enock4seth (2024-04-08 20:17:58+00:00): Hi, such an exhaustive response but I am afraid of your assumptions. Kindly avoid copying adding data from copyrighted sources.
randomnumber (2024-04-08 21:01:57+00:00): I have not and will not add data from copyrighted sources.

Google expressly indicates that "Your content remains yours, which means that you retain any intellectual property rights that you have in your content." https://policies.google.com/terms

That means the copyright in any photos uploaded to Google are held by the person who uploaded it. That is why the note below each of them says "Images may be subject to copyright," and not "Copyright Google." 

Additionally, as I stated before, there is no copyright in factual information. Google says this in their license:

"This license doesn’t cover these types of content: publicly-available factual information that you provide, such as corrections to the address of a local business. That information doesn’t require a license because it’s considered common knowledge that everyone’s free to use." https://policies.google.com/terms

Again, your hyper-zealous understanding of copyright law would mean that you cannot mark a business closed if you got that information from a newspaper, book, TV show, or website which is copyrighted. 

In the last 3 weeks you have wrongly accused me of adding data I didn't add, complained about adding roads which clearly exist and may be mapped per OSM rules, and now you're on me about copyright laws which you don't understand. 

You clearly have a lot of knowledge,  passion, and experience, and I welcome productive feedback on my contributions. But if you don't chill out I'll just mute you so I don't get chastised about this baseless bullshit twice a week.

There aren't many people contributing to OSM Ghana. Let's work together.
Vinber-Pro (2024-03-29 07:36:57+00:00): Hi Sint E7,
thanks for this work.

To understand, could you tell me what is your sources please ?

Regards
Sint E7 (2024-03-29 18:06:20+00:00): My only source is the website of Txik Txak.
OTSeignanx (2024-04-08 21:13:53+00:00): Hi Sint E7. I'm Jerome from the tourist office (seignanx.com). We're using OSM for our Com supports. Thanks for your contrib that help us to share updated datas. Opened to collab !
MxxCon (2024-03-26 01:34:18+00:00): Hello.
Please pay close attention to accurately tagging crosswalks. It is highly unlikely that a crosswalk over 8 lanes of traffic would be "uncontrolled". This is most definitely a traffic_light crosswalk. 🙂
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149030229
MxxCon (2024-03-26 01:37:05+00:00): Hello.
Please do not map sidewalks as a single way loop around the whole block. By doing that you make it impossible to tag each side with individual info, such as different surface or lit conditions. A block should have separate sidewalk ways running parallel to each street. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149030402
TerraNull (2024-03-22 20:56:42+00:00): Primera vez haciendo edificios. En la zona hay una mezcla de que imagenes ha usado cada persona así que decidido usar PNOA/Esri como base.

Principalmente quiero saber como mejorar el caos que hay en la izquierda
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-22 21:01:06+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Wyszyńskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11753833606
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11753834080

"Kruczkowskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11753834070

"Zawadzkiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11753834079
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11753834103

"Batorego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11753834093

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-03-23 09:03:32+00:00): Poprawione.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-22 21:30:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11753874891

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bartgron (2024-03-23 12:46:13+00:00): Ale zmiana organizacji ruchu rozpoczyna się w NOCY z 23 na 24 marca, poza tym do poprawy jest przejazd ulicą Jaworskiego
bartgron (2024-03-23 12:46:46+00:00): Przynajmniej tak jest według informacji z Urzędu Miasta
Adam Haba (2024-03-23 12:48:42+00:00): Masz rację, pomyliły mi się dni.
bartgron (2024-03-23 12:54:20+00:00): No dobra, niech już zostanie, naniosę kilka poprawek, ale potem i tak trzeba będzie to zmienić bo z tego co wiem docelowo na skrzyżowaniu Piłsudskiego i Jaworskiego ma być rondo aczkolwiek nie jestem pewny w 100%