piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck (2025-05-19 22:48:36+00:00): Dear km2pb, I have reverted your edits in which you re-added links to 3rd party Youtube URLs. Whether or not these "make the map more interesting" is not the question here; they don't belong in OSM. I have not sufficiently made this clear in my message to Hubert above, but I am saying this in my capacity as a member of OSM's Data Working Group and I sincerely ask you to stop adding links back in that I have removed (or in fact add any links to 3rd party platforms apart from the well-established Wikipedia links).
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-01-25 14:52:00+00:00): Hi! These segments should not be merged since the advisory speeds are different. I fix it. Thanks!
VLD296 (2025-01-27 22:19:45+00:00): My apologies I missed that. Thanks for your comments and fix!
FGS11 (2025-01-24 18:49:50+00:00): Могут быть лишние метки и линии.
itineris (2025-07-17 15:18:21+00:00): Szia!

Kérlek, szerkesztés előtt az általad használt légifotó réteget mindig igazítsd hozzá egy referenciához - ez Magyarországon jelenleg a FÖMI 2015! A 4212-es főutat például január elején pontosítottam légifelvételek és a Magyar Közút hivatalos nyomvonala alapján. Te pedig odébb raktad a Bing alapján.

Üdv:
Ákos
nqou (2025-07-17 15:33:43+00:00): Szia Ákos!
Bocsánatot kérek és köszönöm, hogy tájékoztattál erről, korábban nem tudtam. Ezentúl ügyelni fogok erre.

Norbi
SomeoneElse (2025-01-25 11:07:00+00:00): Thanks - this, and "Cork No. 5 ED" reappeared in the database.
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-28 12:17:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161855565 where the changeset comment is: revert name deletions by Nunez1, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17169
mueschel (2025-01-25 18:31:38+00:00): Hi,
the tag "card_lock" is not used in any other places. What do you want to tag? A payment or authentication method?
HirschKauz (2025-01-25 13:58:18+00:00): Hi, Ich hab die ersten beiden rausgesucht - die beiden anderen überlasse ich Dir ;-)
Grüße 

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=sch%C3%BCtzenverein+arnoldsweiker&t=ftsa&ia=web
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161724923
HirschKauz (2025-01-25 13:56:42+00:00): https://duckduckgo.com/?q=sch%C3%BCtzenverein+sindorf+hermann+l%C3%B6ns+stra%C3%9Fe&t=ftsa&ia=web
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161725009
aharvey (2025-02-09 04:22:50+00:00): building=skyscaper is not a tag in common use (<20 uses) and not documented on the wiki, nor have I seen any discussion on the tag.

In general I don't think this is a good idea, as "skyscraper" is hard to define, you'd need to pick an arbitrary height and then you may as well just set the height=* tag directly. Furthermore it removes the ability to define what kind of building it is, eg. residential tower or office building.
BartekChom (2025-02-09 05:41:30+00:00): OK, I am sorry. Good arguments. I was removing explicitly discouraged tag building=building and in this case I understood from the source only that it is a skyscraper. In the table i see "Office". Is building=office a good tag? Actually https://www.skyscrapercenter.com/building/6-8-parramatta-square/31473 suggests building=office height=223.3 building:levels=53 website=https://www.psq.com.au/, but you removed it, so maybe you have other ideas. Apparently you are mapping in Sydney, probably you have much better chances to check the facts yourself than I, so you can add the tags I suggested together with source=https://www.skyscrapercenter.com/building/6-8-parramatta-square/31473 or not, I probably should not do anything against preferences of local mappers.
BartekChom (2025-02-09 05:49:51+00:00): (plus start_date=2022, but anyway I am not sure that I would copy all information from a web page even if I were deciding all by myself)
aharvey (2025-02-09 09:23:04+00:00): No worries, I didn't look back to see it was building=building before.

skyscrapercenter.com is a database, which holds a vast collection of information about buildings, they consider this their proprietary data and while their terms mention "public use" after I asked them about use in OSM they clarified that commercial use of their data is not permitted. Since OpenStreetMap publishes data under the ODbL license which does allow commercial use, we can't use their data at all. That's why I removed those tags because it was all copied from that website.

What someone needs to do is go survey this building and measure the height and count the number of levels, and see what's there, is it offices, residences, then use that survey to re-add that information.
BartekChom (2025-02-09 12:14:42+00:00): OK, thank you, I have to remember not to use it.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2025-01-24 20:43:53+00:00): Hi, see if this would be a better (and more widely used) value for the sport tag

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dclimbing_adventure
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2025-01-24 20:46:07+00:00): I'd also tag such small low height free to use parks as 

leisure=pitch

instead of 

leisure=sports_centre

but see for yourself
osmfanest1 (2025-01-25 08:19:42+00:00): Thanks, fixed.
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-31 07:46:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161966705 where the changeset comment is: revert superfund tags added by easymapper after no explanation within 6 days, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161727030
grawal (2025-01-25 18:28:45+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che hai modificato alcuni tag sac_ scale delle way componenti la relazione 224A (7531061), e hai inserito il tag mtb su percorsi che si svolgono su pietraia e ghiacciaio dove la bici la puoi portare tu sulla schiena ma non essere portato... Hai effettuato un recente sopralluogo ?
K0wWypRQG (2025-07-30 18:06:08+00:00): Hier gibt es nichts, was eine Adresse haben könnte. Die Häuser sind seit mehreren Jahren abgerissen.
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-31 07:45:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161966705 where the changeset comment is: revert superfund tags added by easymapper after no explanation within 6 days, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161727030
d3mol3k (2025-01-24 22:24:56+00:00): Hello
We were working on this place at the same time - I cleaned up the buildings and especially their relationships - I hope it turned out well. The buildings create relationships for the needs of 3D visualization on demo.f4map.com
I will most likely be fixing something here this weekend
regards Robert
DressyPear4 (2026-01-12 18:21:15+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Mapear_para_o_renderizador
RedAuburn (2025-01-24 20:06:28+00:00): src https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4426152
RedAuburn (2025-01-24 20:14:36+00:00): src https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3716665
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-31 07:46:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161966705 where the changeset comment is: revert superfund tags added by easymapper after no explanation within 6 days, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161727030
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-31 07:45:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161966705 where the changeset comment is: revert superfund tags added by easymapper after no explanation within 6 days, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161727030
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-31 07:46:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161966705 where the changeset comment is: revert superfund tags added by easymapper after no explanation within 6 days, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161727030
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-31 07:45:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161966705 where the changeset comment is: revert superfund tags added by easymapper after no explanation within 6 days, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161727030
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-31 07:46:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161966705 where the changeset comment is: revert superfund tags added by easymapper after no explanation within 6 days, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161727030
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-31 07:46:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161966705 where the changeset comment is: revert superfund tags added by easymapper after no explanation within 6 days, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161727030
citrula (2025-01-24 21:15:20+00:00): Looks good, thanks for your contribution. There was a small segment of Great Oak Circle that still had the old name, so I fixed that :)
Dimitar155 (2025-01-29 15:31:56+00:00): Same here.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161902214
donovaly (2025-01-29 15:54:10+00:00): Same that you revert things before you discuss them, is that your understanding of a community?
And what about this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6938830490
then please also revert the change someone added the ATM not as a separate node.
If you punish me, then please the others too. I was just a tourist tried to help. I learned my lesson.
Dimitar155 (2025-01-29 16:14:14+00:00): I don't see deleted ATMs there...
donovaly (2025-01-29 16:22:58+00:00): You don't get my point: You act before you speak/discuss/argue.
It is not that you don't have a valid point. You do, it is that you immediately act. You did not give me a chance to understand your points. In fact you are right, a separate node allows to map more. The point is that you immediately acted treating me as a stupid person.
Dimitar155 (2025-01-29 16:35:58+00:00): I'm sorry if it seemed abrupt, that wasn't my intention. For me, it’s often easier to take action first and discuss afterward (that is for changes that "downgrade" the map), since waiting can cause details to fade or get missed (like what/where needs fixing).
donovaly (2025-01-29 16:53:44+00:00): OK. But here there was no need for an immediate action. The nodes I deleted did not provide more info than that there is an ATM. In OSMand~ for example when you search for an ATM, you get results in both cases (separate ATM or atm=yes).
So there is time to give people a chance to discuss.
When you give people a chance to discuss, they can and will learn and not become discouraged.
Here in Albania we miss active members and one of the reasons are that there are few persons, who even no longer live here but still map and make immediate decisions/actions.
Back to my case, your argumentation made sense, i could have said "I agree", the other person in that discussion sees that too and I could re-add the ATMs on my own.
Dimitar155 (2025-01-30 13:14:22+00:00): OsmAnd also allows to search for deposit ATMs (but first you have to find one on the map...).

I haven't thought of that side of the coin, I will take it into account in the future.
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-31 07:45:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161966705 where the changeset comment is: revert superfund tags added by easymapper after no explanation within 6 days, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161727030
woodpeck (2025-01-24 21:06:44+00:00): Dear easymapper, what is "OSM_Location_Editor" and is it possible that you are doing what we call a "mechanical edit" (editing lots of objects without actually looking at what you're doing)? How is this building in Bangladesh a "site=superfund" and what does that even mean?
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-31 07:45:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 161966705 where the changeset comment is: revert superfund tags added by easymapper after no explanation within 6 days, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161727030
Langlaeufer (2025-02-10 18:20:08+00:00): Hallo 7sascha7,
danke das du helfen uns helfen möchtest OSM zu verbessern.

Dein bicycle=yes ist hier überflüssig. Radfahren ist auf Feldwegen per default erlaubt.
Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161727495
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-06 08:58:38+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471639599/history has bicycle = optional_sidepath that was added in this edit
What this tag means? This access value is unusual
AxPkSh (2026-04-06 18:41:49+00:00): Hello,
Here is the wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle=optional%20sidepath?uselang=en
However, your comment prompted me to check Oregon law and bicycle=use_sidepath is probably the appropriate tag. (https://oregon.public.law/statutes/ors_814.420#1-except-as-provided-in-subsections-2-and-3-of-this-section-a-p)
fra76mm (2025-01-29 16:41:04+00:00): Hi, can I ask you why you removed the busway at the bus stop?
woodpeck (2025-01-26 23:35:08+00:00): Dear user Mastodont, please don't add fictional data to OSM. You can use opengeofiction.net if you want to play; OpenStreetMap is for serious contributions only. Your data has been removed by the community.
Glassman (2025-01-25 00:38:16+00:00): I don't believe the community agreed on alt_name:en-US=Gulf of America. The official document only talks about the portion of the gulf next to the US states. This node is for the whole international body of water. Please revert this edit.
NeisBot (2025-01-24 21:10:37+00:00): Hi MapAdmin1, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 87% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 3 highway(s)
- 2 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=161728366
woodpeck (2025-02-07 12:35:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18608914 contains both a via point and a via way - is that intentional?
TheSwavu (2025-02-07 22:41:42+00:00): A more interesting question would be: what router are you using that can't tell it's either straight on or left turn with out a manoeuvre relations?

PS:

If you make one of them fork then the other one needs to also be fork, or if you want the other one to be continue then it needs to be turn.
green_leek (2025-02-08 01:31:01+00:00): There is no "left turn" at the intersection to Chapel Rd, the left lane continue to Chapel Rd. They are both straight on (see the solid line marking), The relation maybe not necessarily as I created turn lanes later on.
MaciekMma (2025-01-25 20:57:26+00:00): Czesc, witaj na OSM.

To zgodne ze stanem faktycznym? Uchwala z 28.02.2019 urzadzala ulice pomiedzy ul. Akacjiowa i ul. Perlowa i ten stan byl odzwierciedlony na OSM. Dasz link do uchwaly? Staramy sie tagowac stan faktyczny.

Warto dodac nawierzchnie np. surface=dirt lub grass, zeby ludzie/nawigacje wiedzialy ze tam jedynie piach, bloto i trawa.

Edytor, ktorego uzywales zwracal uwage na podejrzana kombinacje tagow: proposed=residental i highway=residental. One sobie przecza, trzeba wybrac jeden.

Najmniej istotne, raczej dyskusyjne to czy to w ogole highway=residental, tam przeciez sa intensynie uzytkowane pola i jedynie 2 domy w budowie, wiec zgodnie z wiki OSM - nie pasuje. Nawet z satelity (25 stycznia) widac tylko te Szafirowa do budowanych domow. Uzycie tagu ma konsekwencje np. dla nawigacji, Yanosik pusci tamtendy ruch, nie wiem czy chcialbys tamtedy jechac. Bardziej prawidlowe tagi to np. highway=track (droga do pola/lasu), a przy domach w budowie tag highway=service (czyli tak jak bylo wczesniej - dojazd do czegos np. odosobniony dom, gospodarstwo).

Nie bierz tego personalnie, chcialem raczej pomoc w pierwszych edycjach. Pozdrawiam
MaciekMma (2025-01-25 20:58:32+00:00): Chodzilo mi o to, ze nie moge znalezc uchwaly, ktora urzadzala by ulice tak jak je poprowadziles. Tam nadal tylko pola, a polne drogi bez nazwy.
MaciekMma (2025-01-27 19:24:34+00:00): pozwolilem sobie wycofac zmiany po paru dniach z powodu braku odpowiedzi i braku uchwaly na BIP gminy biala podlaska potwierdzajacej urzadzenie ulic we wskazanym miejscu, klasyfikacja drog obnizona do track (bo tam sa pola)
Leon K2 (2025-02-04 00:46:12+00:00): This feels wrong to me. I understand changing the access, but the road type hasn't suddenly changed because it's temporarily closed.
Ewen Hill (2025-02-05 11:09:20+00:00): Hi Leon - I think that makes perfect sense.  I am going to update this tonight now that the exclusion zone has been dramatically reduced. Thanks for raising this
YoungHiro45 (2025-01-27 21:21:48+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2024-01-13
BCNorwich (2025-01-26 07:54:58+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMao.

I've removed this highway because it duplicates an existing highway. If a feature needs amending it's OSM best practice to amend/correct anty existing feature, not just map it again, thus the feature history is maintained.

Regards Bernard.
RedAuburn (2025-01-24 21:46:46+00:00): src https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4384786
BCNorwich (2025-01-26 08:25:04+00:00): Hi, I've removed Way: 1354039317 as it duplicates an existing highway.

Regards Bernard.
Filip009 (2025-01-25 08:25:52+00:00): Zdravím, keďže sa nejedná o oficiálne web stránky daných pamiatok, používajte prosím tag "url" namiesto "website".
eggie (2025-01-25 08:54:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
The Vi Phung (2025-01-24 22:20:31+00:00): please delete this case, I was chosen wrong wrong
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-24 22:22:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2261883555
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/843502067

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
conradoos (2025-01-27 22:03:56+00:00): Stop creating senseless features.
StC (2025-02-12 20:54:04+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là, je vais essayer de faire la réparation.
StC (2025-02-12 20:58:07+00:00): Je pense avoir réussi, en revanche il reste une ligne bizarre : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1354043664
conradoos (2025-01-27 22:06:05+00:00): Stop creating senseless features.
BCNorwich (2025-01-26 08:34:24+00:00): Ford tag removed from footpath.
BCNorwich (2025-01-26 09:10:16+00:00): Hi, I've removed Way: 1354046852, as it duplicates the existing highway, I've amended the existing highways.

Please check for problems like this before uploading as they would disrupt routing.

Regards Bernard.
pwbriggs (2025-01-31 04:01:20+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I noticed that you added a non-standard tag "building=car_repair", so I've updated it with another changeset, and added some more metadata. Thanks for your contribution!
NeisBot (2025-01-25 08:11:31+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the name you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck #NeisLab
s777n (2025-01-25 11:18:11+00:00): Please dont add fake names. Не стоит добавлять вымышленные имена.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161741720
Dean Koya (2025-01-24 23:27:39+00:00): Local team building business - added by owner
Allison P (2025-01-25 00:26:50+00:00): Cannot verify location
Dean Koya (2025-01-25 00:45:00+00:00): This is the official business address of BreakoutIQ Team Events:
1250 West Glenoaks Blvd Unit E, #211 Glendale, CA 91201
Refer to their website for verification: https://breakoutiq.com/privacy-policy/
Allison P (2025-01-25 00:49:05+00:00): Thank you for the additional info. The existing tags do not describe the feature, so I have updated them.
Dean Koya (2025-01-25 01:08:39+00:00): Ah perfect! I was trying to figure out how to do that. Thank you!
mrpenner (2025-01-25 02:10:20+00:00): Hello and welcome!
Could you please use more meaningful changeset comments? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Thank you!
Jbensman (2025-01-25 16:20:47+00:00): Sorry about that and thanks for letting me know.  I am very new with OSM and learning.  Are you someone I can get help from or is there some place to get help?
Jbensman (2025-01-25 16:21:34+00:00): Here is my story.  I spent decades hiking, backpacking, biking and kayaking GPSing and mapping stuff.    I created free trail maps for Garmin GPSs https://www.gpsfiledepot.com/maps/view/53  I also found and added data from agencies and other users provided me data.  But I have been frustrated with Garmin and not being able to get the maps on my phone.  Then I found OSMAnd and decided to go with it.  So I have been taking points and tracks from I  the maps I created and transferring to OSM.
Jbensman (2025-01-25 16:23:22+00:00): While I am doing this, is it OK to just have a generic comment I cut and pasting saying I am adding and correcting stuff I have previously GPSed?
Jbensman (2025-01-25 16:25:43+00:00): Another issue is I have not firgured out how to get points into OSM directly.  So I am importing them into OSMAnd and then creating a POI there.  But it does not allow me to leave a comment on what I am doing?  Is there an easier way to get points into OSM?
Jbensman (2025-01-25 16:26:33+00:00): On this particular edit, I live by there and I had marked the stuff with my GPS
Jbensman (2025-01-25 16:29:49+00:00): One more thing, I also fixed the nearby  Sam Vadalvine Bike Trail along the river road.  It was really messed up.  I kept getting messages there was a note requesting it be fixed.  I could never find the note and I selected address it, but it did not seem like the note went away.
mrpenner (2025-01-25 16:54:36+00:00): No problem! Thanks for your work. I also use OSMAnd and enjoy hiking and mapping. I'm not that experienced either but feel free to reach out if you have questions.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/help and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Get_help have some links for starting out and where to find help also.

For this changeset, a good comment could have been something like "additions/updates near Lewis and Clark Interpretive Center" or similar. Just something so other mappers (and yourself later on) can tell from the changeset comment what you have done.
wireguy (2025-01-25 03:09:14+00:00): Hi Mark, new?  You seem to be doing great!   Keep up the surveying and mapping.   If you want, there's a slack, discord, and https://community.openstreetmap.org/
silversurfer83 (2025-01-25 09:42:16+00:00): Moin

und wenn die Ampel ausfällt?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161731629
silversurfer83 (2025-01-29 21:26:42+00:00): Und?
rigilk3nt (2025-05-04 07:51:27+00:00): Die Router werten dann eine Ampel + ein Schild. Nicht das Ende der Welt, aber auch nicht so toll. In gewisser Weise ist das Schild teil der Ampelanlage für den Fall, dass der Strom weg ist, wofür es (derzeit) keine Möglichkeit gibt, das auszuwerten.
Die Diskussion gibt es immer wieder.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ampeln-mit-vorfahrtsschild-wie-taggen/88572/5
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-01-26 21:43:34+00:00): Please don't delete features just because they have incorrect tags.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161732324
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-01-26 21:44:35+00:00): Looks like you added the incorrect tag in fact.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-01-26 21:49:24+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161796660
mupoozry (2025-01-30 17:58:10+00:00): Its not that this has the incorrect tag. I deleted this because there is nothing there. no trail of any kind foot/cycling. nothing
mupoozry (2025-01-30 18:07:26+00:00): Oh I misunderstood. I could have sworn this was marked as bike trail. I see that you have reverted (or updated?) it to Fascia Verde.
mupoozry (2025-01-30 18:12:46+00:00): I see what happened. I tried to update just the bridge to "cycle path" tag. Instead I accidentally tagged the whole way as "cycle path". I then thought "there is no cycle path here" and so I deleted it. Please forgive my rookie mistake.