piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2025-10-02 03:00:17+00:00): DWG here - when and where was this change announced?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172730138
kmpoppe_repair (2025-10-02 04:45:16+00:00): You have not participated in the discussion linked in the node, nor have you provided any proof or official sources that substantiate your claim that British English now uses a different name for this node.
Please refrain from doing this edit again.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172731597
NeisBot (2025-10-02 03:06:55+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-03 12:52:29+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172733278
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-24 22:43:49+00:00): Stripped additional SEO spam tags in changeset 183129751

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183129751
gpserror (2025-10-06 18:47:16+00:00): Just a minor comment.  I see you fixed some poorly mapped "forests" and you're completely right that they should not be mapped the way they were, thanks for fixing that.  However next time, could you also indicate this fact in the changeset comment?  Just commenting on the "mass deletions" even if its just a hundred nodes because it triggers peoples' "spidey senses" of vandalism detection.
gpserror (2025-10-06 18:48:30+00:00): (and the geographical area of the changeset...well... standard comment about the size this goes here...)
weblogdryads (2025-10-06 20:46:46+00:00): @gpserror

Noted. Thank you for the feedback. In the future I will note mass deletions in my changesets, and keep them smaller and more localized.
Comino (2025-10-02 07:15:26+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
Gregory Peony (2025-10-02 03:38:19+00:00): https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/31983/tasks/?search=760 Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172730664
vng_me (2025-10-03 02:21:03+00:00): Coastlines are broken after this changeset.
ZeLonewolf (2025-10-03 03:04:08+00:00): Thanks, should be fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172770657
dpschep (2026-03-10 19:07:14+00:00): Folks have noticed that you're mapping duplicate nodes for Flock ALPRs. Please ensure that you are not adding duplicate data to the map when resolving notes. Just mark the note as resolved without mapping anything if it's already mapped.
CurlingMan13 (2026-03-10 19:33:39+00:00): Thank you for the feedback.  Yes, I have already been contacted.  When I initially looked, there were no ALPRs in the vicinity.  I apologize if I missed it.

Notes are closed accordingly.  If you are a part of the flock movement, please try to come up with a better method in enauring notes are not placed in the woods and new notes aren't created where an ALPR already exists.  In aome cases, ALPR notes are being created and that same user is then mapping an ALPR but leaving the note open.

Individuals who leave ALPR/Flock notes do not reapond when pressing for more details, and due to the shear volume of random ALPR notes, it can be tricky to spend the appropriate time and attention mapping them.  Again, with no response or additional info from note generators.
dpschep (2026-03-10 19:55:06+00:00): Neither of us are the note creator nor have we encouraged anyone to make such notes. We, like yourself, have no responsibility for the poor notes of others. You however have a responsibility to do your due diligence when mapping to resolve notes. Notes creators, almost by definition, do not know what is already mapped, especially for ALPRs as most OSM renderings don't show them.
Taya_S (2025-10-02 10:24:07+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172742508
eggie (2025-10-02 07:30:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback:   Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Kays (2026-02-08 00:35:53+00:00): The street markings for cycleway:left:lane have not yet been repainted. Should we just wait and expect it get done eventually?
jengelh (2026-02-08 09:24:03+00:00): I have no preference
pavvv (2025-10-02 07:25:59+00:00): Skoro to już motorway, to można usunąć expressway=* i motorroad=*
Szymson (2025-10-02 08:52:37+00:00): Z drugiej nitki access=no też by wypadało usunąć, skoro otwarte?
eggie (2025-10-02 08:14:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
gormur (2025-10-02 22:43:55+00:00): Siden når ble "standard praksis" å "tag for the renderer"?
Siden når ble taggingen din "egen"?
NKA (2025-10-05 10:04:41+00:00): - "Egen" tagging: Jeg har har selv tagget denne veien som busway. Jeg var den første som tagget denne veien slik (fremgår av historikken på way).

- Med "standard praksis" tenkte jeg på vanlig tagging av veier som inndeles i et hierarki slik som trunk/primary/secondary/secondary osv. og med access restriksjoner tagget i tillegg.

- Jeg har ikke nevnt rendering. Som du vet er highway=busway kontroversiell i OSM i den grad at den nektes tegnet på osm.org, men renderingen er ikke et hovedpoeng her, bare en ulempe.

- Slik jeg ser det er hovedproblemet med busway at a) man får ikke tagget et normalt vei-hierarki, f.eks. når veien også er en fylkesvei (mange er det), b) access-restriksjoner kan tagges på normalt vis, c) taggen er kontroversiell og har dermed vanskeligheter med å finne støtte i kart og i rutere, d) av samme grunn vil ulike brukere tagge samme vei på forskjellig måte. 

- Det er helt greit om du er uenig, men da synes jeg du skal ta det opp på community-siden slik at ikke taggingen blir tilfeldig i Norge.
eggie (2025-10-02 07:40:43+00:00): Dag Open GLD   Even gekeken.
noexit=yes klopt  iet als de weg gewoon doorloopr ook al is het een (voet)pad.

Beter geen wegen opknippen als er routerelaties overheen lopen met editor iD. Dat kan alleen met JOSM. 

Die gaan vervolgens stuk. 
Ik zal even kijken of het simpel te herstellen is. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=172735067

 MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-02 07:45:22+00:00): Wandelroute Koninklijke weg hersteld.
Daar zat nu een gat in.
eggie (2025-10-02 07:53:20+00:00): Even verder gekeken. Wanneer er een weg door het water loopt krijg je natte voeten.
Dan is er meestal een brug of een duiker...   of het is een doorwaadbare plaats.
eggie (2025-10-02 08:08:14+00:00): Wateroversteek opgelost. Die paden zijn verder oke.

MVG
eggie
OPEN-GLD (2025-10-02 09:49:32+00:00): Dag eggie, bedankt voor je opmerkingen en de snelle reactie ;-)
LokNeko (2025-10-02 16:43:15+00:00): 有些建筑名称不确定，留白就行了，不需要打个问号
Yog Sot (2025-10-02 12:43:57+00:00): ah, tak, super
jidanni (2025-10-02 07:40:24+00:00): Sorry if I wrecked something. Hard to tell in iD.
whatismoss (2025-10-02 08:12:33+00:00): Le tag busway est approuvé et utilisé très couramment désormais - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbusway 
Si le manque d'affichage ne vous plait pas, il faut simplement en changer ou aller se joindre aux nombreuses personnes qui réclame son affichage sur OSM Carto : https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/4226
Hans Thompson (2025-10-06 15:17:08+00:00): there is a dog memorial here. why was this removed?
michael60634 (2025-10-06 15:44:13+00:00): I couldn't find anything about a dog memorial existing here. Additionally, the name "dog memorial" doesn't look like the actual name of a real place. Do you have any pictures of this memorial?
Hans Thompson (2025-10-07 15:08:46+00:00): I might have a photo somewhere in my google photos but it isn't indexed in a way I can easily access it.  Here is a googlephoto sphere link that shows the area has some intention to it but it isn't readable.  

https://maps.app.goo.gl/Pu8sEuauo7wtxERn9 

I am a local and I have walked by this area many times and can confirm that this is a de facto area used a dog memorial and it is labeled as such at the location.
michael60634 (2026-04-07 11:16:51+00:00): This edit was made in error and has been corrected.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-02 08:30:56+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1434814913

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
TrickyFoxy (2025-10-08 10:47:54+00:00): Зим это название или сокращение?
user_23351273 (2025-10-08 11:58:42+00:00): Это сокращение от слова зимний.
Зимний домик, утеплённый домик.
Верно было бы, отказаться от использования сокращения.
TrickyFoxy (2025-10-08 12:11:07+00:00): Убрал. Из типа объекта должно быть понятно
NM$L (2025-10-02 13:05:07+00:00): This changeset was fully reverted in the changeset 172748179 since:

OSM follows de-facto: There is no on-the-ground evidence support that Vietnam had controlled Xisha Qundao (Paracel Islands, which are under Chinese control).
NeisBot (2025-10-02 08:30:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-03 12:52:09+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/172739816
sorcrosc (2025-10-05 10:59:07+00:00): Tanti altri indirizzi aggiunti, visibilmente importati dalle fonti comunali, probabilmente senza autorizzazione e peggio, senza dichiararne la provenienza
Anas masuris (2025-10-02 16:53:04+00:00): Bardzo ładnie, ładnie. Można rozważyć dodanie dróg dla służb pomocniczych - na orto i w BDOT widać jej kształty, są trawniki z czegoś ażurowego + jest opis "j.i.", czyli jezdnia z inną nawierzchnią
Sylabowy Kot (2025-10-02 22:42:41+00:00): Wiem, na BDOT jest podział trawy na normalny trawnik i ten przejezdny jako część drogi pożarowej, co łatwo wskazuje przeznaczenie. Od razu zmapowałem jako oddzielne kształty. 

O ile nieśmiało propaguję mapowanie dróg pożarowych, tak lekko się samemu wstrzymuję z takimi drogami jak tu, które były by dziwnymi rozszerzeniami chodników, mają inną symetrię. 

Będę skrobał na dniach pewnie kolejne kwartały, by się tu w końcu zazieleniło. Następne pójdzie osiedle między sektorami ROD "Sigma-Bartycka", bo tam to dopiero straszy szarością. Niech kto inny spróbuje ogarnąć takie chodnikowo-trawnikowe drogi awaryjne :D
Sylabowy Kot (2025-10-02 22:44:06+00:00): Po tamtym wypełnieniu wrócę do Wiślanego Mokotowa. W międzyczasie robię różne inne miejsca w mieście (za dużo tego naraz się podjąłem).
frydzio (2025-10-03 09:39:22+00:00): W dyskusji na forum podawałem nawet przykład z sąsiedniego etapu. Tutaj rozsądnym rozwiązaniem jest chyba tylko dodanie 'fire_path=yes' do chodników pokrywających się z drogą pożarową. Tutaj projektant zaprojektował ciągi piesze przeskakujące z jednej strony drogi pożarowej na drugą więc lepiej odwzorować ich przebieg. To jest ich podstawowa funkcja. Funkcja pożarowa jest tylko dodatkiem.
❤️‍🔥 (2025-10-02 09:45:12+00:00): nice work! should we tag the whole area as  http://osm.wiki/Tag:farmyard=stockyard ? not sure if that tag applies
markbegbie (2025-10-02 11:17:23+00:00): Thanks! I'm not finished it, will have more time M the next day or two.

I actually wondered about this. My thinking was that farmyard=stockyard is a refinement of landuse=farmyard. However, as a sale yard, the appropriate primary tag seemed to be landuse=commercial.

Interested in opinions or precedent on how to deal with this.
❤️‍🔥 (2025-10-03 03:09:44+00:00): yeah I wasn't sure either, was wondering if you had any insight. for this one in Tekapo I tagged it as 'stockyard' but it also didn't feel right https://osm.org/way/387478315
aTarom (2025-10-02 14:29:56+00:00): Hola, en las descripciones no está permitido texto tipo SEO, tienes la info en
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam
Emilio L (2025-10-02 20:24:05+00:00): Tienes razón, lo haré más descriptivo y más escueto.
Guixovitch (2025-10-06 13:15:12+00:00): Bonjour,
Il semblerait que vous ayez supprimé une grande partie de la zone résidentiel de Brest via la suppression de https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13154579
Pouvez-vous faire un retour arrière sur cette suppression ?
eggie (2025-10-02 08:59:48+00:00): Dag Semwerkt, Je description wordt gezien als werving en dat is niet de bedoeling in OSM.
Zou je de description willen aanpassen.?

MVG
eggie
VictorIE (2026-05-22 16:00:40+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395649820/

National Gas doesn't operate in Northern Ireland.

https://www.nationalgas.com/our-businesses/our-network-and-assets

"National Gas owns the gas National Transmission System (NTS) in Great Britain" and "The NTS also exports gas to the island of Ireland and to continental Europe via connecting pipelines, called interconnectors."

The system in NI is owned by Operated by GNI (UK) Ltd, Mutual Energy (which also owns Premier Transmission Limited and Belfast Gas Transmission Limited), Evolve (was SGN Natural Gas), Kinecx Energy (was Firmus) and Phoenix Energy (was Phoenix Natural Gas).
LordGarySugar (2025-10-16 16:37:17+00:00): Hi, is there a specific reason for why you are dividing up residential landuse in this way? I can't work out the logic behind what is divided up and what isn't, and there's no tags differentiating each area. 

For your information, I used this area as an example in a forum post I created (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/individual-residential-landuse-for-each-house-or-street-good-or-bad/136497) among other examples to seek opinions from the wider community about whether this kind of mapping style is desired or not. The general consensus so far is that mapping physical barriers such as fences is ok, but splitting up landuse according to cadastral parcels is not necessary. It would be interesting to hear your point of view. Thanks in advance.
user_5173844 (2025-10-16 18:33:34+00:00): Thanks for bringing this discussion to my attention. I will reply there.
welzheimerwald (2025-10-05 11:23:35+00:00): Removed redundant Vienna boundary relation after a discussion in the OSM forum (see here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/doppel-mapping-von-geometrisch-identen-verwaltungsgrenzen-wien/136386 ).
erikapekop (2025-10-02 09:09:43+00:00): Ik dacht dat ik de huisnummers 17 en 17A op de juiste plek heb gezet. Dit is echter niet te zien.
17 is het westelijke deel, 17A het oostelijke. Zo loopt de nummering gelijk op met de rest van de straat: west loopt af, oost loopt op.
Ik heb het kennelijk niet goed gedaan.
eggie (2025-10-02 09:11:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Toch wel. De cache van je scherm verversen. Paar keet CTRL-F5  of nog een beetje geduld.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-10-02 09:15:46+00:00): Dag Semwerkt,

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
No advertising

The description should only include neutral and factual information about the object. It should not include subjective evaluations, e.g. "the best restaurant in town", "modern, comfortable hotel, in the heart of the city". Do not use description=* for advertising messages. They will be removed as spam and may also have further consequences for your OSM account. 

MVG
eggie
SimonPoole (2025-10-02 10:16:09+00:00): Hi, please stop deleting house numbers. I don't know why you believe they are duplicates, but they are not.
SimonPoole (2025-10-02 10:18:54+00:00): The deletions are not necessary and seem to be based on a (wrong) belief that the addresses are duplicates.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172742306
eggie (2025-10-02 09:19:44+00:00): No advertising

The description should only include neutral and factual information about the object. It should not include subjective evaluations, e.g. "the best restaurant in town", "modern, comfortable hotel, in the heart of the city". Do not use description=* for advertising messages. They will be removed as spam and may also have further consequences for your OSM account.
eggie (2025-10-02 09:23:45+00:00): Beste Semwerkt,  Je kunt gewoon de website toevoegen. Hier is description niet voor bedoeld.
Het wordt gezien als 'spam' in OSM. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-02 09:37:50+00:00): Dag Slip. Ik heb die adresnodes weer verwijderd. Ook het adres van de gebouwomtrek.
Er zijn hier gewoon adresnodes.
Ze liggen alleen op een hoopje. Ik heb ze nu iets uit elkaar gehaald. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-02 09:40:21+00:00): Soms is het zelfs handig om die adfesnodes bij de hoofdingang te plaatsen met het oog op bezorgdiensten
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Junghuhnstraat+3&objectId=0603200000027677&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=82451.99150128175&geometry.y=451441.354080247&zoomlevel=16

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-02 09:30:19+00:00): description verwijderd
eggie (2025-10-02 10:11:53+00:00): I restored the addressnode. Please use CTRL-F5 to refresh your screen. 
Addressnodes are already present. 
gr eggie
Slip7 (2025-10-02 10:19:00+00:00): tnx
eggie (2025-10-02 09:42:37+00:00): Gebruik svp de bestaande BAG adresnodes van het Kadaster om op bij te taggen.
Ze liggen nu iets uit elkaar. 
Dus geen adresnodes toevoegen. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-02 09:49:38+00:00): Будь ласка, використовуйте існуючі адресні вузли BAG Земельного реєстру для позначення.
Наразі вони трохи розділені.
Тому не додавайте жодних адресних вузлів.

З повагою,
eggie
gurglypipe (2025-10-02 09:38:05+00:00): Thanks :)
Patr1k_P (2025-10-15 10:12:58+00:00): ahoj preco si to zmenil na track? tie cesticky su pre chodcov a cyklistov, nie pre traktory
mapperue (2025-10-15 11:27:14+00:00): Ahij, tie cesty sú pre vozidlá správy povodia a sú na nich cyklotrasy. Rovnako aj mosty sú hospodárske mosty a nielen lávky pre chodcov a cyklistov.
mapperue (2025-10-15 11:37:35+00:00): Podobne je to s plánovanou cyklostezkou v okolí Uherského Ostrohu:
„Pokud vede cyklostezka po koruně protipovodňové ochranné hráze nebo po břehu toku, požadujeme, aby byla vybudovaná s dostatečnou únosností a bez problémů umožňovala pojezd naší těžké techniky po koruně a kolem vodního toku," uvedla Jana Kučerová z útvaru vnějších vztahů Povodí Moravy.
IvaLedinščak (2025-10-15 10:21:15+00:00): Reverted because of an unnecessary node #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173312912
wildmaps (2025-10-05 20:29:35+00:00): Hi @user_5359,
may I ask why you changed ref:UIC back to uic_ref?
There is an ongoing discussion on the community forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/railway-station-id-confusion-uic-ref/132393
 and also my proposal on the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Wildmaps/fix_ref:UIC_and_name:UIC.
If possible, I’d appreciate it if you could comment on the forum thread so we can find a common direction on this topic.

The user "hlfan" disagreed with my proposal, so I decided to test the approach manually for now, starting with the station in my hometown. Or is it to early to start doing this? I hope we can reach a consens.
mueschel (2025-10-05 21:12:43+00:00): Changing the tag can be done, but this needs agreement among all users of this data.  Until such a consensus is reached, it's best to keep the status quo and then change all the tags at once. A mixture makes it impossible to use this data.
wildmaps (2025-10-06 09:26:00+00:00): Thanks for clarifying., and sorry for the inconvenience.
I’ve restored the tags to uic_ref to keep the data consistent until there’s a clear agreement.
Max-Kritic (2025-10-03 15:12:46+00:00): Je suis intéressé par une photo . C'est sur un itinéraire cyclable.  Tu ne fais pas de reportage avec Mapillary ?
Sébastien Pi (2025-10-05 16:26:56+00:00): Tu peux la voir ici : https://api.panoramax.xyz/?focus=pic&map=19.14/50.561735/3.174209&pic=fd22c39b-da3e-44e7-9980-b1570d930ec8&speed=250&xyz=166.32/-1.87/45
Sauf si elle a changé récemment.
Sébastien Pi (2025-10-05 16:30:28+00:00): Pour être plus complet, avant, il y avait un petit chemin piéton pour contourner, mais ces bourricots ont mis du grillage (ou quelque chose du genre) la dernière fois que j’y suis allé.
Mathias, on peut passer au-dessus à vélo (ce que j’avais fait). Tu ne penses pas qu’on pourrait lui mettre un bicyle=dismount ?
Max-Kritic (2025-10-06 05:41:50+00:00): Merci. Je vois que Panoramas est bien utilisé du côté de Lille. 

Donc les chevaux passent, mais pas les cyclistes.
Sébastien Pi (2025-10-06 21:14:12+00:00): Au-delà des participants individuels, nous pouvons remercier la métropole qui verse sur Panoramax les photos de rue qu’elle fait réaliser.
Mathias_ADAV (2025-10-07 07:39:03+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai fais cette modif suite à un repérage de notre commission vélotourisme, la photo n'est pas encore en ligne sur le site de l'AF3V avec cette description : "Cette barrière permet le passage de
chevaux mais interdit le passage de familles avec poussettes, d’handicapés en fauteuil roulant et de
cyclistes. Il existe un passage à l’extrémité du parking qui permet de contourner la difficulté. Cependant il n’est pas balisé. Il faut le trouver."
Sébastien Pi (2025-10-07 20:04:49+00:00): Il y a des sas dans les deux driveway qui sont reliés au chemin.
Par contre, la dernière fois que je suis passé, cela ne permettait pas le passage d’un vélo cargo ou une remorque.
Il y a des sortes de rigoles en bois tout au long du chemin, mais sont régulièrement cassées par endroit ce que permet de passer plus facilement.
Je vais ajouter les sas, mais à la limite il faudrait ajouter un chemin informel pour montrer où il est possible de passer (quelle bêtise d’avoir bloqué le passage de la véloroute ici, à se demander si les décideurs réfléchissent parfois !)
Sébastien Pi (2025-10-07 20:10:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172976309#map=15/50.56500/3.18438&layers=N
Mathias_ADAV (2025-10-14 09:26:53+00:00): voici la photo : https://sig.af3v.org/index.php/view/media/getMedia?repository=rep1&project=veloroutes&path=media%2Fphotos%2F615-Barrie%CC%80re+2.jpeg
arcanma (2025-10-02 15:29:39+00:00): Benvenuto ula16, vedo che hai iniziato oggi a collaborare.
L'etichetta access=no significa che è una strada chiusa al traffico, ossia c'è il segnale di divieto circolare bianco bordato di rosso, se è una strada privata si usa access=private e in ogni caso l'etichetta highway=* (in questo caso highway=track) non va cancellato, lasciando solo l'etichetta access=* non si capisce a cosa l'accesso è vietato o consentito nei vari casi (clienti, destinazione, privato, ecc.)
eggie (2025-10-02 10:26:19+00:00): Wanneer je Stationweg Barneveld intypt en kiest voor Zoeken zie je wat er verder onder valt. 
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=169598.26&geometry.y=462022.08&zoomlevel=11.04
Gr eggie
eggie (2025-10-02 10:26:34+00:00): typo Stationsweg