piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tyfi (2023-12-03 03:55:10+00:00): C never ran concurrently with M at all, and neither touched Schell City.
tyfi (2023-12-03 03:55:48+00:00): The only state route in Schell City is AA.
empty_child (2023-12-03 19:00:50+00:00): Добрый день
Спасибо за вклад в проект. Пожалуйста, используйте корректные теги. 1) religion=christian denomination=jehovahs_witness 2) в name добавляйте только грузинские имена. Другие - в соответствующие теги (name:ru в данном случае)
rarad74 (2023-12-04 20:10:22+00:00): Salut. Cladirile trebuie obligatoriu sa aiba tagul de cladire. building=yes sau apartments, chiar daca pui adresa si denumirea blocului. Daca pui si denumirea blocului in acelasi timp cu adresa, va fi afisata doar denumirea cladirii, nu si adresa. Nu ai cum sa le faci sa se vada ambele.
asterix^^ (2023-12-04 20:39:05+00:00): Salutare. Mulțumesc pt info. Într-adevăr, asta am dorit să fac atunci când am redesenat întreaga stradă în urmă cu mai multe zile, să apară numerele de bloc pe hartă, precum în cartierele Tractorul și Avantgarden, fiindcă numerele de stradă sunt în mare parte aceleași. La această editare, am corectat niște numere de stradă incomplete pe care le adăugasem tot eu când am redesenat blocurile.
asterix^^ (2023-12-04 20:47:30+00:00): Am reviziut acum și istoricul editării și am înțeles și despre ce era vorba cu building=apartments. Mulțumesc.
Horchata___ (2024-01-22 03:05:01+00:00): Construction has already been finished.
Henry572 (2023-12-04 17:48:11+00:00): Hi physi,
Thanks for fixing the typo in Paulshöfe. Why did you delete the other quarters though? From my experience the names are in use here. I can also find some usage on different websites.
Hendrik

See for example:
Corelliviertel:
https://rp-online.de/nrw/staedte/duesseldorf/stadtteile/projekt-mittendrin-iin-duesseldorf-urdenbach-geht-weiter_aid-102268541
https://www.immobilienscout24.de/expose/140578054#/
https://evku.de/familienzentrum-suedallee/
Musikantenviertel:
https://rp-online.de/nrw/staedte/duesseldorf/duesseldorf-musikalische-hommage-an-das-musikantenviertel_aid-81411209
https://www.wz.de/nrw/duesseldorf/hier-ziehen-die-sternsinger-durch-die-duesseldorfer-stadtteile_aid-48100451
https://www.ddorf-aktuell.de/2023/04/25/duesseldorf-urdenbach-hitzige-diskussionen-beim-beteiligungsverfahren-zur-strassenumbenennung/
Benrather Rathausviertel:
https://auf-ins-viertel.de/duesseldorf-stadtfuehrungen/benrath/
https://www.duesseldorf.de/medienportal/pressemitteilung?tx_pld_frontpage%5Baction%5D=detail&tx_pld_frontpage%5Bcontroller%5D=FrontendNews&tx_pld_frontpage%5Bnews%5D=14710&cHash=9f38e45a53dc50ec166402afd7dfcf74
Haus-Endt-Siedlung:
https://rp-online.de/nrw/staedte/duesseldorf/haus-endt-siedlung-problemviertel-in-duesseldorf-urdenbach_aid-66126945
physi_retired (2023-12-06 13:21:18+00:00): Hallo Hendrik, (i assume we can continue in German, otherwise let me know)
es handelt sich um lokale Bezeichnungen, die keine übergeordnete Verwendung finden oder die lediglich beschreibend sind. Schon in Holthausen wird es schwierig sein, jemanden zu finden, der mit dem Begriff "Musikantenviertel" etwas verbindet. Und die anderen Bezeichnungen sind Umschreibungen für "die Umgebung der Corellistraße" ("des Benrather Rathauses", "der Haus-Endt-Straße"). 
Das taggen als "quarter" misst diesen Beschreibungen eine Bedeutung bei, nicht zuletzt auch in der Darstellung, die sie meiner Ansicht nach nicht haben.
Ich finde auch keine Präzedenzfälle, bei denen in vergleichbarer Weise place=quarter verwendet wurde. Die relativ wenigen Nutzungen in der Umgebung haben entweder Stadtteilcharakter (z. B. Erfttal-West) oder finden sich als Wikipedia-Eintrag (z. B. Meistersiedlung).
Also zusammengefasst: das taggen dieser Begriffe als place=quarter ist meiner Ansicht nach unverhältnismäßig.
Gruß,
physi
Henry572 (2023-12-06 18:51:40+00:00): Hallo physi,
Du hast Recht, dass die Namen nur relativ lokal gebräuchlich sind. Gerade deshalb wollte ich sie erfassen, weil man ja durchaus danach suchen könnte. place=quarter ist aber wohl zu hoch gegriffen. Du hast scheinbar nichts gegen die Eintragung der Paulshöfe, dann können wohl auch die Annahöfe (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1219805885) und das Mühlenviertel (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11259454166) drin bleiben? Dann trage ich nichts gelöschtes wieder ein, kann aber ähnliche Neubausiedlungen mit plot/city_block mappen?
Gruß, Hendrik
uknown-gryphus (2023-12-18 02:43:42+00:00): Hi, thank you for your edit, but this way does exist on the ground. It is only open during specific hours, but the correct way to tag that is access=yes@(opening_hours), not just deleting the way. This way is actively used by commuters and buses, so please re-insert the way.
Yherisson (2023-12-03 08:07:11+00:00): Désolé, je corrigés mes adresses en warning avec osmose, j'ai pas vu qu'une d'entre elle était ailleurs.
puchaczowsky (2024-01-10 11:41:56+00:00): na pewno Real? od 2014 roku nie ma ich w Polsce
◪ Jarv (2023-12-05 00:07:05+00:00): Hi Rco97,

From memory, this road has no access for motor vehicles, except buses.
If this is still the case it should have been left how it was (highway = pedestrians && motor_vehicle = no), although it should also have bus = yes. I see you have changed the highway type & motor vehicle access, has the road changed in the past year or two to allow any motor vehicles to use it? Also it currently does not have oneway tags applied to it
soliMM (2024-06-14 12:23:25+00:00): Hi,

I would also like to point out that according to this Mapillary photo: 

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.783913888889&lng=-0.67175&z=17&pKey=427118032307543&focus=photo&x=0.4873636590120501&y=0.4387928926573414&zoom=0

this is indeed pedestrian zone, with specific access restrictions that can be seen clearly on the sign.
gurglypipe (2023-12-03 19:28:54+00:00): Hi, are you sure this is right? This edit looks like it’s removing information from the map, because those buildings are only odds house numbers. The new tagging does not reflect that.
Paul Berry (2023-12-03 22:01:57+00:00): Apologies, I missed off the interpolation tag. Now added.
gurglypipe (2023-12-03 22:19:12+00:00): Thanks. (For anyone reading this in future, the interpolation tag was added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144733917.)

I think you might need to make similar changes for at least the following changesets too:
 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144713523
 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144713590
 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144713796
Paul Berry (2023-12-04 11:49:51+00:00): All corrected. Thank you.
gurglypipe (2023-12-04 11:56:13+00:00): That’s great, thanks a lot :)
Frans S (2023-12-03 09:29:23+00:00): Hello. I checked this changeset.
This is not a ditch (which transports water through agriculture fields) but a water storage. Tag these as landuse=reservoir
reservoir type= water_storage
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144713700
Frans S (2023-12-03 09:22:02+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Hi. It is too simple to just outline a group of buildings and call it 1 building. The aim is to map all buildings individually, which is not that simple here.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144713756
mcliquid (2023-12-03 15:54:46+00:00): Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
alan_gr (2025-02-02 23:56:32+00:00): Hello,
The route relation Granada - Almeria is tagged as Cercanias Asturias. I think it was introduced with this changeset. Was this intended?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6641022
kräckel (2025-02-03 13:55:36+00:00): Hi,
Cercanias Asturias part or the network,
it was a suggestion from the editor program, please report it if it is wrong.
BR
b-holdet (2024-02-10 07:33:34+00:00): Gælder access:condition stadig?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1228381508
runejuhl (2024-02-18 12:38:28+00:00): Nej, den er efterladt ved en fejl. Tak!
BCNorwich (2023-12-04 08:27:30+00:00): Duplicated highway and very long ford removed.
silversurfer83 (2023-12-03 18:43:10+00:00): Howdy :)

Hier mehr Details zu Sirenen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dsiren

Hoffe, du hattest einen angenehmen Sonntag
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144714611
ika-chan! (2023-12-03 09:30:52+00:00): Specifically, the bridge was claimed to be under construction by the same user associated with the fictional motorway proposals and therefore it could not be verified. If it is true that the bridge is closed, please redo the closure but add a source and estimated reopening date.
jimkats (2023-12-25 13:23:32+00:00): The bridge really was closed, and opened about the time you made the last edit on there. I was about to change it to that, but it seems you did it before me, accidentally :d.
And yes, considering the user who closed it, it indeed would seem suspicious, but I didn't "fix" it, as I knew the bridge was indeed closed due to its collapse. And there was no official estimation date for that. They now fixed it.
HellMap (2023-12-03 10:36:58+00:00): Hello,

Can you please clarify where exactly is this guest house is located? The node you placed is almost on top of an intersection in a park area. Is it in the building nearby? Does it have a name?

Thanks
richlv (2023-12-04 08:59:51+00:00): Might be a personal note for the nearby hotel.
richlv (2023-12-08 22:31:14+00:00): It's been 5 days without a response, perhaps worth deleting the node?
HellMap (2023-12-09 13:07:36+00:00): Yes, I think it's fair to delete the node.

I am however also interested in the other 2 hotel nodes added previously. One is on top of some rural residentials and one is in a multistorey building, but nothing in Mapillary or quick search suggests an obvious hotel. These could be Airbnb-style locations, but we don't really map those and the editor would have to confirm.
richlv (2023-12-13 17:53:44+00:00): Yeah, I don't think it makes sense to map AirBnB locations, those are located by address 99% of the time anyway.

Deleted this node.

Regarding the other nodes, would you have a chance to comment on those changesets?
HellMap (2023-12-13 18:36:02+00:00): One of the other two was already deleted at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141846834 . I deleted the other one.

Sorry, but I'm not going to waste my time on leaving yet another comment that won't be replied to.
richlv (2023-12-15 13:01:01+00:00): Hehe, all good, no worries :)
One use from changeset comments is that in the future they potentially can allow to see which users are not responding, but in this case - likely not that relevant.
aceman444 (2024-06-05 18:15:12+00:00): Hi, what are your sources? You cannot see crossing bells, uic_ref codes and similar information on aerial imagery or terrain shading.
Tombula (2023-12-03 18:11:27+00:00): Moin kart057, herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Ich sehe du bist schon fleißig am Bearbeiten der Karte und ich hoffe dir macht es Spaß! :)
Allerdings möchte ich dir hier einen Hinweis geben: 
Du hast in diesem Changeset Fußgängerampeln entfernt. Warum?
Auch hast du einen kreuzenden Knoten zwischen Bürgersteig und privater Auffahrt entfernt. Auch hier stellt sich mir die Frage warum?
In Openstreetmap sollten alle Wege, die sich kreuzen einen gemeinsamen Knoten haben. Das ist sehr wichtig für Router (Navis).
Falls du Hilfe beim Zurücknehmen deiner Änderung benötigst, kommentier hier gerne.
Grüße und schönen 1. Advent noch!
Tombula
Tombula (2023-12-05 14:16:06+00:00): Moin kart057, ich habe deinen Änderungssatz soeben Rückgängig gemacht. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144793537)
Jakka (2023-12-04 08:08:22+00:00): een bakkerij kan nooit op de openbare weg zijn Wel binnen de vorm gebouw. Naam locatie ook niet 100% vermoed ik
In je berichten box wat info.
Jakka (2023-12-04 09:54:24+00:00): En is deze bakker 24/7 open ? Lijkt niet mogelijk ...
bridgeconst (2024-05-07 10:28:27+00:00): Please check outer line around the access road to "Mirador Base del Teide". It's marked as "scrub", so this vegetation is rendered over the parking and the road
Rahim Jalali (2023-12-03 10:27:50+00:00): کافینت جهینه
HikeAndMap (2024-02-01 21:39:55+00:00): Hi there, please don't set these to "limited' you really don't wish to go into a jeep with a wheelchair! We're talking about lifting the wheelchair 1m at least and squeezing it through a narrow opening.

What are jeeps?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeepney#/media/File:Jeepney_in_Legazpi_City.JPG

you wouldn't want to try to get into one with a wheelchair.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144716306
wheelmap_visitor (2024-06-04 10:09:09+00:00): You are right – changed the value to "no".
map per (2023-12-12 14:06:21+00:00): Because of review_requested:
Looks good to me
Tomas_J (2024-11-09 13:51:18+00:00): Zdravim, môžeš, prosím , pozrieť na tento fixme (viz link nižšie) týkajúci sa podzemných kanálov, ktoré si mapova?. Dik. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12325440256#map=19/48.428620/18.845753
macdale (2024-11-09 18:09:26+00:00): Zdravim, tieto toky sa v podzemi fizicky nekrizuju a ani vertikalne nenapajaju. Ich rozdielny vyskovy priebeh je vyjadreny tagom layer -1, -2, takze toto by malo stacit a teda fixnut nic uz netreba.
Tomas_J (2024-11-10 07:48:40+00:00): ok, dik, fixme som zmazal.
RicoElectrico (2023-12-13 14:57:17+00:00): Cześć, możesz coś więcej powiedzieć o tej aplikacji, którą edytowałeś mapę? Pierwsze o niej słyszę :)
Kuboslawik (2023-12-13 18:33:34+00:00): Cześć, napisałem hobbistycznie aplikację na Androida, która służy do prezentacji stacji naprawy rowerów na mapie, oraz można za jej pomocą też zmienić kilka ich najważniejszych parametrów. Obecnie jest w otwartym teście, planuję ją szerzej opublikować na wiosne/lato przyszłego roku. Możesz znaleźć ją pod linkiem poniżej, zapraszam Cię do testowania i jak masz jakieś pytania lub sugestie to napisz na priv :)

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.bicycle_pumps_map&hl=pl&gl=US
RicoElectrico (2023-12-12 12:28:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3747603 - to chyba możesz zamknąć :)
whb (2023-12-05 22:10:58+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4013344
Bobropiton (2023-12-03 11:13:49+00:00): Троллейбус 10-ТУАХ. Добавлены необходимые теги на улицы и теги в маршрут
Taya_S (2023-12-05 17:23:27+00:00): Zou je aub iets voorzichtiger willen mappen? Deze relation heb je in deze changeset gebroken: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12883446
Groeten,
Taya
Mark Davies1664 (2024-05-20 10:18:30+00:00): This is spelt wrong and the area is not within the national park, the correct spelling is langata
moje_konto (2023-12-03 17:31:11+00:00): Znowu usuwasz świeżo dodane budynki. Jest w ewidencji i na satelicie.

Edycje bez weryfikacji nie mają żadnego sensu, skoro ktoś przed chwilą dodał, to koniecznie trzeba sprawdzić przed usunięciem.

Nie dziwne, że masz aż tyle edycji na liczniku skoro lecisz masowo i niedokładnie.
Branko Kokanovic (2023-12-19 14:39:15+00:00): I ovde ste izmenili sa "Палих бораца Средњева 1" na "Војводе Путника 1". Samo potvrdite da je to tačno (da ste namerno ovo uradili jer znate šta je tu bolje nego RGZ), pošto su ulice jedne do druge
M_Gaugg (2023-12-03 15:38:20+00:00): Hier stimmt etwas nicht, das gesamte Siedlungsgebiet von Zirl wurde als Bergwacht markiert -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46922100#map=15/47.2713/11.2437
fs_LT (2023-12-04 10:02:14+00:00): Ich habe einen der auf diesen folgenden Änderungssätze (144725893) revertet. In diesem wurde das zuerst auf building geänderte Gebiet dann überhaupt (zusammen mit unzähligen anderen Knoten) gelöscht.
literan (2023-12-03 12:56:24+00:00): ну какой это офис?)) какой организации?)
ivanma (2023-12-03 13:50:17+00:00): пишут часть резиденции президента РФ
literan (2023-12-03 14:07:55+00:00): резиденция Президента - московский Кремль. Вот это и есть часть Кремля. 

в OSM принцип - один объект на местности = один объект на карте. Вот и надо, получается, тег офиса ставить один на весь Кремль, а не на каждую его часть
uvi (2024-07-28 05:34:21+00:00): Hier gibt es einen Fehler auf der Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4351397
Der Weg ist seit über 4 Jahren als access=private erfasst und nun auch noch einmal so bestätigt.
Wo führt der Wanderweg tatsächlich entlang?
Marvk (2026-06-30 20:37:13+00:00): Hallo werbuli,

auf welcher Basis hast du https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13701966 als access=private getaggt? Auf Mapillary sieht man ein Schild "Privatweg" mit Zusatzschld "Betreten auf eigene Gefahr". Der Weg scheint zudem nicht eingefriedet zu sein, dementsprechend würde ich ihn wie vorher als access=permissive taggen.

Aus dem Wiki:

Eine Beschilderung „Privatweg“ ist hier nicht gleichzusetzen. Diese zeigt lediglich eine geänderte Straßenunterhaltungspflicht an, jedoch kein allgemeines Betretungsverbot. Ein „Betreten verboten“ bzw. ein „Befahren verboten“ wäre hier entsprechend als access=private bzw. vehicle=private umzusetzen. Ein „Durchgang verboten“ bzw. „Durchfahrt verboten“ entspricht jedoch eher einem access=destination bzw. vehicle=destination. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:access%3Dprivate

Sag mir gerne, was du darüber denkst.

Beste Grüße
Marv
werbuli (2026-07-09 06:01:11+00:00): Hallo Marv,
als ich das gemappt habe und auch aktuell (gestern nachgesehen) steht der Text  den ich in note geschrieben habe auf dem Schild. Da scheint Mapillary wohl älter zu sein.
Gruß
werbuli
osmviborg (2023-12-03 12:26:16+00:00): Alhedestien er øverst, ingen layer. Bygningen er nedenunder, layer -1 OK?
gscholz (2023-12-06 07:42:24+00:00): Hi hecktor,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=8.01490&lat=47.27141&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144719237

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
danieldegroot2 (2023-12-03 12:52:47+00:00): This changeset was reverted by
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144720002

Tried instead
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144720296
note on Mapillary there is actually space between the flowerbeds.
Kurt PM Lapere (2023-12-03 12:18:26+00:00): Actually, comment should say: store point and name added
danieldegroot2 (2023-12-03 12:52:54+00:00): This changeset was reverted by
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144720002

Tried instead
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144720296
note on Mapillary there is actually space between the flowerbeds.
danieldegroot2 (2023-12-03 12:52:56+00:00): This changeset was reverted by
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144720002

Tried instead
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144720296
note on Mapillary there is actually space between the flowerbeds.
danieldegroot2 (2023-12-03 12:52:58+00:00): This changeset was reverted by
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144720002

Tried instead
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144720296
note on Mapillary there is actually space between the flowerbeds.
arjunaraoc (2023-12-19 01:18:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145272163
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144719784
dpolovinkin (2024-03-14 13:50:29+00:00): hi, noticed that here you added some buildings which already do exist on the map... 
like this one added 3 months ago by you - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1228408837
but on the same place this exists already https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227226565 which was added 4 months ago :) will delete the duplicates
bxl-forever (2023-12-03 13:25:49+00:00): Thanks for this.

Next time, make sure to write opening hours with the correct syntax, otherwise no app will be able to understand it properly.

Don’t worry, we fixed it.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-03 13:10:54+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2319909059
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1228412404

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
danieldegroot2 (2023-12-03 13:20:09+00:00): Looks like
https://rubyreds.ie/

Location is Newpark Shopping Centre..

Instagram is invalid, is
https://www.instagram.com/rubyredskilkenny/
but inactive. (there is facebook but haven't checked)

but website may be outdated.
mcliquid (2023-12-03 15:54:51+00:00): Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
mcliquid (2023-12-03 15:56:29+00:00): Furthermore, you have now created some of the POIs twice, as they already existed.
mcliquid (2024-02-20 17:16:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted as there has been no response to questions so far: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144720662

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147701025
danieldegroot2 (2023-12-03 13:21:25+00:00): Looks like
https://www.sportsinjurysurgery.ie/
habi (2024-01-17 16:17:13+00:00): Ciao Tursiops33

Please do not map separate highway=cycleways if they are *not* separated by structural measures, e.g. a wall or really a separate way.
If the cycleway runs along the street and is only marked on the street, add a `cycleway=lane` tag (or the correct value) on the highway, as specified in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway
Greetings,
habi

PS: I'm here because of https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4071424, where another user correctly noted that there's no separate cycleway.
slice0 (2023-12-08 12:47:25+00:00): this is not correct, this section is secondary. the other one is also correct. that small part is primary. Source is Data SA.
slice0 (2023-12-08 12:52:36+00:00): I understand it looks strange and I had to verify it with 2 different sources as well.
ouchjars (2023-12-08 18:58:42+00:00): Is there any consensus that classification needs to follow that source exactly?
slice0 (2023-12-08 20:55:59+00:00): i just looked into this and now I agree that it should be primary because it is part of A14 just like the small section on grange road. I will put it back to primary now
slice0 (2023-12-10 08:11:33+00:00): I have added a note to both these small sections explaining why they are primary incase anyone was going to change them