piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ohmanger (2023-06-12 09:33:04+00:00): Quite true! I've surveyed lots of Ride UK paths that go through private land.

I'd argue bicycle tags should only be added if permission is explicitly permitted or if the infrastructure suggests it, which isn't the case here.

It appears this user has assumed permission by default in a LOT of cases, which is encouraging trespassing and could get users into trouble.

They've also pretty much ruined Telford's route mapping for bikes. I've already had to undo a change to a path with a narrow kissing gate.
Richard (2023-06-12 10:19:16+00:00): Oh yikes :(
olo81 (2023-04-18 13:00:15+00:00): Do poprawy albo skasowania. 
Prawne ograniczenia trzeba odpowiednio tagować!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:maxspeed

brakuje tagu :

maxspeed=50 source:maxspeed=PL:urban
olo81 (2023-04-24 11:01:03+00:00): zestaw zmian wycofany w całości
Jakka (2023-04-10 06:56:22+00:00): Name tag est pour les noms propres et pas pour indiquer les propriétaires ;)
Corriger svp
Sandal man (2023-04-09 07:29:19+00:00): Thanks for editing the OSM map but you placed the spring on the wrong place, it is a little bit further.
So I draw it on the right spot.
Regards Jan
Tapet (2023-04-09 11:40:11+00:00): Hi, warum hast du die Postleitzahlengrenze so verschoben, dass Hausnummer 86 jetzt in 44623 liegt, obwohl diese laut INSPIRE-Daten in 44629 liegt? Die addr:postcode im Gebäude mit Hausnummer 86 sind zudem weiterhin 44629, was nicht zur verschobenen Grenze passt.
wambacher (2023-04-09 18:57:36+00:00): fixed. 
jetzt musst du "nur noch" entscheiden, was die richtige PLZ für Anandalus ist.
wambacher (2023-04-09 19:00:20+00:00): ps: wie kommt man an Inspire für NRW ran? Ich kenne nur das NRW Alkis-Layer im Josm.
Tapet (2023-04-09 19:08:37+00:00): Danke für die Änderungen und dein Tool. Die eine noch offene Postleitzahl werde ich mir anschauen.

Die INSPIRE-Daten gibt es im Open-Data Portal vom Land NRW unter der folgenden URL: https://open.nrw/dataset/a34677dd-d717-498e-9ae6-c187d0c3efcb. Wie man die am einfachsten in JOSM bekommt weiß ich leider nicht, ich habe QGIS genutzt.
wambacher (2023-04-10 20:59:21+00:00): Danke.
wenn ich das in Josm hinbekomme, melde ich mich. Ansonsten halt QGIS, was auch kein Problem ist.
Tapet (2023-04-09 11:45:20+00:00): Hi, laut INSPIRE-Daten und der offiziellen Webseite, hat die Realschule Sodingen die Postleitzahl 44627 und nicht wie jetzt eingetragen die 44628. Basiert deine Änderung auf der vorher (suboptimal) eingetragenen boundary=postal_code?
wambacher (2023-04-09 18:32:07+00:00): Jo, mag sein. Irgendwas hatte mich in der Gegend verwirrt und ich hab wohl die falsche Entsheidung getroffen.
sollte erledigt sein.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-01 09:13:17+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10795789370/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Map_HeRo (2025-11-14 16:13:18+00:00): Hallo Osmwithspace,

von dem ehemaligen Fischerhof sind keine Relikte mehr vor Ort vorhanden (restlos geschleift), daher gehört er nicht mehr in OSM, sondern allenfalls in OHM. Außerdem befindet sich der Node über 200 m vom tatsächlichen ehemaligen Standort  entfernt. Dort steht heute eine entsprechende Infotafel und die ist bereits gemappt. Ich werde den Node daher jetzt löschen.

Gruß Mikke
LockOnGuy (2023-04-09 02:43:41+00:00): Hello Claudius Henrichs, I see you removed the tag "tower:type=communication", maybe this by mistake? no problem, I restored it.     
Regards.
Claudius Henrichs (2023-07-17 08:09:46+00:00): Hi, thanks for revewing this change. I am seeing tower:type=communication in tagging practice being primarily used to tag towers that house communication antenna (mobile tower, directional communication antenna etc.). Unfortunately, the OSM wiki documentation is not very specific in defining this tag.
I don't think this tag applies to an airport control tower since the purpose of building this tower is to observe ground (and incoming/outgoing runway) traffic on the airport. I would say that tower:type=observation is more suitable therefor and I've already seen airport traffic control towers being tagged this way. Ideally though I think it would deserve a new tag like tower:type=atc or tower:type=control_tower since it's a distinct tower type constructed for this purpose.
What do you think?
LockOnGuy (2023-07-17 08:13:19+00:00): Hello, If you see that fit please update it. Thank you and regards.
Claudius Henrichs (2023-07-17 11:57:29+00:00): Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138618750
Rhodez (2023-04-08 20:24:09+00:00): Hello, technicien4

The road was already marked as private. The deletion was unnecessary and has been reverted. All maps will show that road as private and as long as it is rendered properly, no one will be routed down that. If you have any concerns, please respond

Thanks, Rhodez
welzheimerwald (2023-09-04 22:11:31+00:00): Wurden hier etwa Gemeindegrenzen nach belieben verschoben? Gemeinde- und Kreisgrenzen werden werden durch die Vermessungsbehörden festgelegt und sind im Liegenschaftskataster nachgewiesen - dieses ist etwa über geoportal-bw.de abrufbar. OSM soll die Realität abbilden - daher bitte kein Fantasiemapping mehr betreiben!
gscholz (2023-04-16 16:29:35+00:00): Hi Yessica25,
this changeset has created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and overlapping/duplicate ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-74.88155&lat=5.02458&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=134667130

I have reverted it to fix those issues.
Guido
canfe (2024-01-18 07:44:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134667469

can you define the segment
way 861178719
please?
MitjaJez (2024-01-21 20:24:26+00:00): Discusion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mappatura-pianura-padana/97997/22
Seems to be replaced with 861178716.
861178719 may be deteled.
cb44 (2023-04-08 20:36:38+00:00): Note: I meant "north" here, not "south".
Hufkratzer (2023-04-08 21:28:24+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1160755998 looks like a riding arena. These are usually tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian instead of leisure=horse_riding.
In JOSM you can use preset for sport=equestrian for that.
Compare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding
silversurfer83 (2023-04-09 07:20:20+00:00): Moin und frohe Ostern

Ich sehe die Quellenangabe hat sich immerhin etwas verbessert. Danke.

Den link zur Erklärung der Änderungskommentare schicke ich dir gerne nochmal, da du den Artikel scheinbar immer noch nicht gelesen und/oder verstanden hast.
Aber da ich gerade mit einem Kaffee hier sitze erkläre ich es auch gerne noch einmal mit einem Beispiel welches vielleicht sogar zu dieser Änderung hier passt:
"Fehlende Feld-/Waldwege im Reinhardswald nach Erkundung vor Ort und mit Luftbild ergänzt" 
Gerne nach Bedarf für jede Änderung anpassen. 

Des weiteren warten wir noch auf Antworten in anderen Änderungssatzdiskussionen da es stellenweise Unklarheiten bzgl. deiner Änderungen gibt. Guck da bitte noch einmal. 

Und zum Schluss: Ich will dich nicht ärgern oder deine Arbeit schlecht machen. Ich möchte nur, dass du auf Kontaktaufnahme reagierst, damit offene Fragen geklärt werden können. Du arbeitest schließlich nicht alleine an dieser Datenbank und niemand ist perfekt. 

Schöne Feiertage 
Silversurfer83
Bierphysik (2024-03-26 08:12:09+00:00): Hi. Du hast https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39476336 als highway=footway getaggt. Das ist in D so nicht ganz richtig. Das ist ein highway=path. ein highway=footway taggt man bei vorhandensein von BEschilderung und/oder baulicher Ausweisung: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dfootway
Bierphysik (2024-03-26 08:12:54+00:00): Pi mal Daumen Regel: highway=footway gibs in D eigentlich nur innerorts oder nahe an Ortsgrenzen.
Daniel22Ka (2023-04-08 21:13:58+00:00): Bitte nicht löschen oder Firmen wie RNV oder VRN ändern, falls was getraggt wurde das es später nicht angezeigt wird dann gerne ändern oder ergänzen
habi (2023-09-18 10:41:28+00:00): Ciao Beat
Du hast dem "Fussweg mit Naturtreppe" keine sog. Tags mitgegeben, sondern nur die Geometrie eingezeichnet.
Zusätzlich war der Weg auc nicht mit dem Stengeli und dem Lagenwilweg verbunden, und wurde dadurch auch nicht fürs Routing verwendet.
Ich habe das Problem in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141417872 gelöst, evtl. müssten noch die Zugangsbeschränkungen erfasst werden, da es für mich 'aus der Luft' so aussieht, als würde der Weg über Privatgelände führen.
E Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi
Ververs (2023-04-09 09:23:00+00:00): Er zijn geen drempels maar de hondenuitlaatstrook is niet verhard (gras/aangestampte aarde). Valt dit dan toch onder rolstoelvriendelijk?
eggie (2023-04-09 10:07:59+00:00): Denk dat het meer is hoe je er kunt komen..onneembare hekken.. wildroosters.
Maar als het bagger is dan wordt het lastig denk ik. Wanneer je twijfelt vul je gewoon niets in.
Gr eggie
eggie (2023-04-09 07:05:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
emersonveenstra (2023-04-08 21:34:58+00:00): Looks good, thanks!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-08 21:30:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2471714688

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Osiedle Kaszubskie":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147536861
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147536862
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147536863
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148458200

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2023-04-09 07:03:41+00:00): Dag rerennn   Je vraagt feedback.  Je hebt gewoon een leeg lijntje toegevoegd hier zonder verder tags. Dat zal niets doen in OSM.
Kijk je nog even?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=134669107
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-04-09 14:11:12+00:00): Pad voorzien van highway tag en aan de uiteinden verbonden met de andere wegen. 
oneway=yes  heb ik niet toegevoegd, want ik weet de richting niet. 

MVG
eggie
pi11 (2023-04-09 14:12:37+00:00): Dag Piedrovds, je hebt een klein foutje gemaakt: de tag "place=isolated_dwelling" gebruik je om kleine nederzettingen aan te duiden. Als je een individueel huis wil taggen, gebruik je hiervoor "building=house".

Als je niet zeker bent wat de betekenis van een tag is, kan je die steeds op de wiki vinden, bijvoorbeeld: (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Disolated_dwelling).

Bedankt om de kaart te verbeteren! :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134669579
MxxCon (2023-04-10 02:53:14+00:00): Hello.
Please note that charge= tag has a specific syntax that should be followed. It is documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:charge
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134669861
PeterCooperJr (2023-04-14 19:53:39+00:00): When I hiked this trail a few months ago, it wasn't clear to me whether the signs were trying to say that the trail itself was private, or just that the land on the side of the trail was. That is, I don't know if the signs were saying to stay on the trail and not explore elsewhere, or saying to not go on the trail at all. (Though given that the trail ends at the pipeline, there isn't really much reason for anyone to take this trail.) This is just FYI; I have no objection to the edit.
Do you have more information on whether it's the trail itself that's private, or whether it really should still be called "Plimpton Street"? I'm honestly not even sure it should still have that name through the WMA at all, let alone this portion once one goes through it all, though I'm guessing (just a guess) that it was all called that at one point.
AccurateSpoons (2023-04-23 03:32:35+00:00): In the absence of any other information, I look at what direction the 'private property' signs are pointed. If I am standing in the middle of a road/trail/path and looking straight ahead, and the signs are pointed directly at me and can read them without difficulty- I take that as a clue that the road/trail/path is private property. If I have to turn my head 90 degrees to read the signs, I then consider the signs indicating that the private property is off the side of the road/trail/path, and that the road/trail/path itself is public.
AccurateSpoons (2023-04-23 03:34:38+00:00): I wouldn't argue with anyone who stripped the "Plimpton Street" label for the trail - either the Sturbridge part or the whole thing!
Fizzie-DWG (2023-04-09 01:50:05+00:00): User blocked & all CS reverted
ivanbranco (2023-04-15 15:58:15+00:00): Hi, you edited lot of place names in several changeset. Seems weird to me that all of them were wrong, is it possible that they were were at least alternative, local or old names? In this case is not okay to just delete them, since this information is lost. You should have moved them to loc_name, old_name, alt_name or something else.

Can you clarify it?
ComitéNosAccents (2023-04-15 17:32:53+00:00): {{reply to|ivanbranco}} Hi Ivan,

The official names of localities, hamlets and villages in Valle d'Aosta / Vallée d'Aoste are determined by the municipalities in consultation with and sent to the president of the autonomous region for approval, which is usually done by regional decree. Not all municipalities of Aosta Valley have done this, but most have. You can consult a full list of official toponyms here: https://www.regione.vda.it/enti_locali/cartella_i.asp?pk_cartelle=183

As it turns out, many toponyms are simply incorrect on digital cartography websites such as OpenStreetMap, Google Maps and Apple Maps (in ascending order of errors). As for alternative, local or old names, they may be added using alt_name I suppose, but I have solely relied on official toponyms approved by law for my edits. Happy to discuss specific toponyms if you have specific questions about each of them.
ivanbranco (2023-04-15 18:12:16+00:00): Let's take Lein (previously Leyn).

I searched for it and found that is mentioned even in the official comune website: 1.
https://www.comune.sarre.ao.it/old/p2.1-1_tutela_e_valorizzazione_naturalistica_5000-signed.pdf
"A nord-ovest del villaggio di Leyn: presenza di Carlina acanthifolia All"
2. https://www.comune.sarre.ao.it/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/sentieri_ita.pdf
"area prativa su cui sono adagiati gli edifici di Leyn "

so I guess it's at least an alt_name candidate since even is own comune called it such way.
ivanbranco (2023-04-15 18:13:21+00:00): I mean, if someone wrote all those name as name=* in OSM before I guess they found them somewhere, so they were in use at the moment of the edit.
ComitéNosAccents (2023-04-15 19:38:31+00:00): Unlike the official toponymy approved by regional decree, which went through a peer-review of a toponymy committee, of the municipal council and of the autonomous region, there is no guarantee that the same happened to those two documents. I suppose it could be an alt_name or old_name candidate, since we don't know if that was the name previously used prior to the adoption of 11 december 2012 regional decree n. 464., but it is possible it is simply a mistake that keeps on perpetuating itself. And as the municipality of Sarre itself reminds the reader on its website:
https://www.comune.sarre.ao.it/il-paese-e-le-associazioni/paese/frazioni/
"Lein".

Now, I do have to thank you for mentioning the alt_name_1 tag, which I have used for Champdepraz, where the regional decree mentions both the official name and alternative names: https://www.regione.vda.it/enti_locali/documento_i.asp?pk_documenti=1181

But in the case of the municipality of Sarre, no alternative names were provided. Therefore, I cannot recommend Leyn as an alt_name or old_name.

Following your comments I will, however, review previous edits of mine to make sure that when a municipality has established "alternative/in-use names", that they are reflected in the tags of the locality/hamlet/village too. Of course, those cannot supersede the official name, by definition.

Does this answer your concern with respect to this particular village?
ivanbranco (2023-04-15 20:08:03+00:00): ___Following your comments I will, however, review previous edits of mine to make sure that when a municipality has established "alternative/in-use names", that they are reflected in the tags of the locality/hamlet/village too.___

thank you, thanks for the edits and good mapping
MxxCon (2023-04-10 03:09:11+00:00): Hello.
Please note that if you want to specify floor number, you should use addr:floor tag, not addr:unit as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:floor and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:*
Also phone= tag should contain country code as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134670129
DaveF (2023-04-10 10:56:35+00:00): Hi
When creating platforms as polygons could you please add the 'area=yes' tag.
This is required to render railway=platforms as infilled grey.
That it currently renders infilled without it is a bug in OSM-carto's data & will be fixed.
bjohas (2023-04-10 13:16:40+00:00): Hi DaveF, thank you so much for the tip - will check this for anything I've created. Thanks for the comment.
DaveF (2023-04-12 13:41:20+00:00): FYI The platform ids are: 
"389572592","162235602","162235603","1160774810","1160775481","1160778447","1160778448","1160780909","1160780910"
bjohas (2023-04-12 17:14:16+00:00): Sorry, I'd only gotten round to some of those. All fixed now. I ran an overpass query, and there are many platforms that do not have area=yes. Should I go and fix those as well?
kechan (2023-04-08 23:06:15+00:00): I could have updated them to place=neighbourhood, but there is already a node with that tag in both
JochenB (2023-04-08 23:04:36+00:00): Sorry, der Änderungssatz bezieht sich auf Grießbach und nicht auf Einsiedel
cserpell (2023-04-09 15:20:18+00:00): Hola, por qué este camino está marcado como que no se puede caminar por él? Dentro del pueblo, la gente camina por ahí...
Fizzie-DWG (2023-04-09 01:53:00+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism & sock-puppet: changeset/134672146
Fizzie-DWG (2023-04-09 01:52:50+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism & sock-puppet: changeset/134672146
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-09 17:10:49+00:00): Parking lot polygons should cover the service road as well.
davegis (2023-04-17 13:26:28+00:00): Okay. I will cover the service Roads as well.
Ktr101 (2026-05-02 04:04:58+00:00): Hello, I just wanted to note that I removed this feature because it has never been officially proposed by the MBTA, and seems to be floating around local transit groups as the most official proposal at the moment (that said, I also think this is a good idea). In the future, please utilize the existing rail routing for any proposals, as it makes editing features easier.
matteditmsts (2023-04-09 00:12:31+00:00): source should actually say "2023-04-08 survey".
kechan_Rapid (2023-04-09 00:21:19+00:00): no roads
LockOnGuy (2023-04-09 02:33:43+00:00): You did the same exact vandal edit you did in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134557923 again. This changeset has been reverted too.
user_12523467 (2023-04-09 02:34:10+00:00): this is a clear vandalism, your second vandalism with the same edits after Iraq OSM community has revert your previous vandalism in changeset : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134557923

clearly you have no time to answer to our inquiry!!
FraukeLeo (2023-08-19 14:14:07+00:00): Hi Necessarycoot72, an elevation of 291 m seems hardly plausible. The hills here around the B 260 road are all of similar elevation, so it should rather be 491 m. Maybe "height" referred to something else, then it was not the best idea to change the tagging without local knowledge :)
Necessarycoot72 (2023-08-19 18:18:02+00:00): That maproulette challenge was about converting height to ele, as mountains peaks don't use height. I'm not the one who put that number im there.
Necessarycoot72 (2023-08-19 18:18:21+00:00): *in there
FraukeLeo (2023-08-19 18:32:54+00:00): That’s what I meant to say. I am aware you didn’t put the number in there, however your edit turned a tag that was wrong in form and undefined in content into a tag that was correct in form, but wrong in content. In other words, your edit turned useless data into false data :-/ that’s what I don’t like about these maproulette activities.
Necessarycoot72 (2023-08-19 19:23:01+00:00): ah, sorry, I misread your comment. Thanks for fixing it. If there's a problem with map roulette challenge, you can contact the author or report the challenge.
InsertUser (2023-04-13 13:37:45+00:00): Please save between editing in widely separated areas.
wille (2023-04-10 12:17:14+00:00): The cable car is not active any more, and is covered by plants now: https://www.instagram.com/p/CqoFvBbpFma/

And here is the funicular in activity: https://www.instagram.com/p/Comx12dO1Cx/
sorcrosc (2023-04-09 02:02:03+00:00): Michele,
hai inserito vie con nome:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1160784966
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154286747
numero di piani di edifici:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149072001
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149075684

Il tuo commento al changeset deve essere corretto e non specifichi la fonte delle informazioni che inserisci.
LockOnGuy (2023-05-21 21:41:26+00:00): Hello, what is the source of "Erbil Train Station" and all the railways you added in Erbil? it doesn't show on any sat image..    
Regards.
luisforte (2023-04-09 10:41:17+00:00): Bom dia
Testes e/ou experiências não são feitos em ambiente de produção. Para fazer experiências deve utilizar o servidor de desenvolvimento em https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/
luisforte (2023-04-09 10:54:39+00:00): Já agora, pretende manter estes "testes" na base de dados?
landuse=orchard tem as regras de utilização definidas em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dorchard, proponho-lhe uma leitura desta documentação.
aselvadeasfalto (2023-04-09 14:42:28+00:00): Boa tarde,
Obrigado por esse recurso; ainda não o conhecia.
O objectivo era testar a razoabilidade de desenhar as fiadas de árvores, e o seu efeito no mapa, com o propósito de distinguir olivais/amendoais tradicionais dos intensivos - diferença bem notória na paisagem. Com 'teste' estava só a seguir o exemplo de um changeset na mesma região de um contribuidor veterano [https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49956668#map=17/38.01806/-7.76144&layers=D]. Visto que não produz a sobrecarga visual que esperava, e a documentação para landuse=orchard não desaconselha esta pormenorização, não pretendo remover estas alterações, mas também não continuará a ser uma prioridade nas minhas edições.

Boa Páscoa,
Selva