piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-07 17:31:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1349258086

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kamilbogacki (2025-01-14 12:26:21+00:00): Cześć. Nie dodawaj w przyszłości opisów obiektów w polu name, tylko w polu description.
AurélienQ (2025-01-08 16:53:06+00:00): Bonjour, je suis le chantier également, et je vois qu'il doit être finit (vu que tu as lancé la maj sur OSM).
Cependant, voici quelques remarques :
1) Mets un commentaire lorsque tu envoies tes modifs. Cela permet rapidement savoir de quoi traite ton groupe de modifs. Par exemple ici tu aurais pu mettre "màj d'un chantier".
2) Ensuite, il faudrait déclasser l'ancien itinéraire de la départementale de highway=primary vers highway=secondary voire tertiary (je pencherais vers tertiary). En effet la traversée du village ne se fera théoriquement plus que pour les riverains. Certes, le secteur manque de cohérence concernant la classification des routes, mais il faut bien commencer à faire quelque chose de logique quelque part.

Sinon c'est super que tu ais fait la màj. Bien à toi,
Aurélien
Cricri93160 (2025-01-08 16:57:50+00:00): Bonjour 
Merci c’est normal car j’aime quand c’est à jour. 
Moi j’utilise go map sur iOS pour mettre à jour osm et j’ai pas réussi à enlever l’encien trace au milieu du rond point
Cricri93160 (2025-01-08 17:02:41+00:00): Sur go map j’ai toujours du mal à relier ou crée des nouveaux rond point qui ne sont pas présent sur osm
AurélienQ (2025-01-08 17:46:18+00:00): Je ne connais pas go map, mais sur PC lorsque tu es sur osm.org, le bouton "modifier" permet de modifier la carte simplement. (CQFD)

Je vais corriger ce que tu n'as pas pu faire.
Cricri93160 (2025-01-08 17:51:12+00:00): Merci
rodolfovargas (2025-01-20 12:59:45+00:00): Hola!
Las calles de la Zona de Villa Dolores NO SON DE UN SOLO SENTIDO, Por lo general todas las calles de doble sentido, por la funcionalidad comercial del barrio.
Gracias por corregir su edición.
VictorIE (2025-06-10 06:36:27+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1349259277/

Would this be better if marked as flood_prone=yes instead of access=no?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-07 17:41:07+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12480835864
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12480835865

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 17:19:51+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11824327362/history has app_operated = yes that was added in this edit
What app_operated=yes means here? Have you wanted to mark that you can control it with app in some way but app may be necessary or not? For example shop where you can scan and pay with app, without going through a traditional line. Or is it for objects where you need an app to use them at all? Then maybe app_operated=only would be better?

Note, this key seems undocumented on wiki, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:app_operated and
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 17:22:47+00:00): welp, this page actually exists now, I forgot to check it and I forgot that I tried to document it (feel free to check its correctness!)

sorry for last sentence being wrong
wuff57 (2025-12-05 17:48:54+00:00): Hello Mateusz, there are basically two types of parcel_lockers in Germany. One can only be operated via app, i.e. it does not have a display or any other input means, the other has a display and a barcode scanner. I saw that someone else had indicated this difference using the tags app_operated and display_operated, so I used these tags as well. I have so far only used the value "yes"; for the app_operated parcel lockers "only" may be more appropriate. I don't know whether the lockers having a display could also be operated via the DHL app.
Danysan95 (2026-01-04 10:01:26+00:00): Hai creato un elemento ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12480903773 ) con sia brand:wikidata=Q2042514 che not:brand:wikidata=Q2042514 ; uno dei due è errato e va rimosso, quale?
ivanbranco (2026-01-04 11:07:56+00:00): Perché tutti questi POI cancellati e poi ri-aggiunti?

Ad esempio, Carrefour aveva una history di 15 anni: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1218191174/history
l'hai cancellato e ricreato: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12480903780/history
tra l'altro con una perdita di informazioni (indirizzo e orari sono spariti). Inoltre la note non è chiara.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
notmyproblem1 (2026-03-07 16:17:50+00:00): scusatemi, ero anche nuovo nuovo ed era la mia prima vacanza con OSM
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-07 17:51:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Woryty":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12480904114
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12480904115
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12480904116
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12480904117
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12480904118
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12480904119
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1246727586

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-07 17:51:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465449548

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2025-01-20 19:12:04+00:00): poprawione
s777n (2025-01-07 18:26:58+00:00): Здравствуйте. Не стоит добавлять  слова-категории к объектам. Слова вроде "магазин" или "спортивная площадка"  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#%D0%98%D0%BC%D1%8F_%E2%80%93_%D1%8D%D1%82%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B8_%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-30 23:56:20+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam name/tags, split relevant tags properly between building and POI, and removed inappropriate service=driveway from service roads in changeset 183421987

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183421987
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-07 17:51:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Dorotowo":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1135513713
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1246398635
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1246398739
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1246398828
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1349261807
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1349261809
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1349261810

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-07 17:51:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1349262452

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-07 18:01:09+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1246398723

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
lmagreault (2025-01-28 18:44:22+00:00): Tu te dis que tu vas mettre à jour le nom de la bibliothèque et là, tu vois que c'est déjà fait. Bien joué !-)
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-07 18:11:10+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Różnowo":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12480945563
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12480945564
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12480945565
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12480945566
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12480945567
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12480945568
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12480945569
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12480945570

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
DD1GJ (2025-01-07 20:19:31+00:00): Hallo juesini,  willkommen bei OSM. Bei dem Wilde-Rodach-Radweg gab es ein grundlegendes Missverständnis bezüglich des Anlegens von Radrouten. Deren Verlauf wird in einer Relation mit bereits bestehenden Wegen dokumentiert. Du hattest jedoch den Verlauf nochmals als Radweg über bereits bestehende Wege und Straßen gezeichnet, was ein Datenchaos verursachte. Ich habe daher alle Deine Radweg-Änderungen rückgängig gemacht.

Weitere Informationen findest Du unter

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:route
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-07 18:11:11+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148700022

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-30 23:55:35+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam name/tags, split relevant tags properly between building and POI, and removed inappropriate service=driveway from service roads in changeset 183421987

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183421987
mavl (2026-05-03 05:38:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 182142872 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20224].
mweper (2025-01-08 12:54:21+00:00): Hello. I see that you have "opened" the section of road under construction, but I don't see any source of information where such an enabling of circulation is mentioned. 

How do you know that you can now drive in that direction of the route? 
If so, the missing street crossings should also be added.
dcskobuffs (2025-01-08 22:11:21+00:00): Hello mweper,

I saw the construction was open on Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2024-12-28. Apple has an agreement with Maxar to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which is not publicly available for editing OpenStreetMap. We generally use the imagery that is already available in JOSM but where we do use that more recent imagery, we always cite it and the date the imagery is from in the changeset source. 

The road is upgraded from what is visible in public imagery, as the road is wider with four lanes rather than the two lane bidirectional visible in imageries such as Esri World Imagery. With these updates and vehicles actively moving on this road visible, this suggested to me that construction here has finished. As for the street crossings, because of the solid line in between the directions, I was not certain these roads extended across.
mweper (2025-01-09 00:48:54+00:00): I must admit that I do not know the area at the moment and I do not know which sections are finished and enabled for circulation and which are not, but if updated satellite images show that they are ready for use, perfect.
Here are some sources of information that I was able to gather for reference:

* https://cuestiondedesarrollo.com.ar/se-construye-una-nueva-autovia-en-provincia-de-santa-fe/
* https://www.santafe.gov.ar/index.php/web/content/view/full/185544?e=0&p=1
* https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/autov%C3%ADa-rp21-alvear-fighiera-ex-rn9-seccion-bs-as-rosario-provincia-de-santa-fe.2400442/?post_id=190230626#post-190230626

The issue that concerns me is the correct navigation with the crossings connected in both directions. As they are currently, the calculation of navigation on that avenue is greatly deteriorated.
dcskobuffs (2025-01-10 18:18:31+00:00): I understand your concern about the connectivity with the crossings here. However, while the imagery I used shows the road update, I do not have any resources further to support the crossings extending across this road. If you feel it is necessary, you are welcome to make those updates.
mweper (2025-01-13 13:05:05+00:00): I don't know physically where there is an actual crossing and where there is not by the center median, as I don't have images to prove such a case. But you have told me that you have updated images and if they are of quality, you should be able to make out where the center median is cut or if there are turn arrows painted on the street.

That would be a great help in correcting the navigation, since as it currently stands, to cross from one direction to the other, you have to do several km and I guess this would not reflect reality.

e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=-33.055688%2C-60.599502%3B-33.055454%2C-60.599492#map=16/-33.05774/-60.59423
dcskobuffs (2025-01-14 17:30:09+00:00): I am only able to verify that this road is four lanes across and that it is open to traffic. I cannot determine which crossings are possible or not because there is a solid line or low barrier dividing the highway throughout this segment and no painted indications for turns. It is conceivable that roads like Suipacha (road) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/770889526 that you routed from could cross solid painted markings on entering Avenida San Martín (and/or exiting). I just cannot confirm that so I am not comfortable with making those cross connections. Though if you have local knowledge of traffic rules the City of Rosario and surrounding areas, I will defer to your updates in OSM. Good luck!
sorcrosc (2025-01-08 09:19:50+00:00): Buongiorno. Sembra che questi sono nomi di persone. Non vanno inseriti i nomi delle persone come nome degli edifici.
Grazie
benoitdd (2025-06-30 15:38:05+00:00): hello, bel ajout, en plus de la capture Panoramax!
tu dois pouvoir ajouter le complément à l'ouest en te basant sur la position de tes images panoramax, que tu peux ajouter en surcouche dans l'éditeur iD.

Il faudrait passer le highway en path. (voir recommandations sur cette page : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Cyclisme_tout_terrain)

pour la difficulté, il y a la clé https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:mtb:scale, je te laisse regarder ce qui serait le plus adapté
rempshaener (2025-01-07 19:31:09+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Diesem Wunsch komme ich sehr gerne nach.

Größe des Changesets: Wenn möglich, wähle kleinere Dimensionen, dann sind deine Anpassungen für andere Mapper besser nachvollziehbar.

Verwendung von Relationen: Hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18517956 hast du eine Relation genutzt, die nichts anderes aussagt als „ich bestehe auch zwei Linienstücken“. Das ist in der Regel nicht notwendig und über einen „way“ abbildbar. Näheres zum Datenmodell findest du z. B. hier: https://openstreetmap.de/beitragen/datenmodell/

Verkleben: Den bereits oben genannten Acker hast du teilweise mit Straßen verbunden. Das sollte vermieden werden.

Überlagerungen: Der Acker „überlagert“ andere Objekte, insbesondere ein Wohngebiet, Gebäude, aber auch Straßen. Das ist so nicht richtig. Unterschiedliche landuses müssen einander ablösen, indem sie aneinandergrenzen und enden am Straßenrand. Das bedeutet hier einiges Arbeit, d.h. du müsstest das Objekt „klein schneiden“.

waterway=drain
Das wäre laut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:waterway=drain ein„kleiner Abwasserkanal von der Breite eines Baches, in der Regel mit Beton oder Ähnlichem ausgekleidet“ – das kommt nicht so oft vor. Wahrscheinlich meintest du waterway=ditch. Bitte beachte auch die Fließrichtung.

Bitte melde dich, wenn du Fragen haben solltest, gerne hier im Changeset oder indem du wieder ein Häkchen zur Prüfung setzt. Weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.

Viele Grüße
jengelh (2025-12-27 09:02:13+00:00): Also hier residential=rural zu setzen ist schon arg gewagt... (und IMHO falsch)
Stahlmann (2025-12-29 16:08:42+00:00): "is used to specify residential areas with low-rise residential buildings (buildings with tag building=house). It is usual for each house has its own fenced allotment with yard and/or garden."

Wenn ich das verwendet habe, habe ich schon auf den Bebauungstyp geachtet. Bei Wohngebieten mit Einfamilienhäusern, auch innerhalb von Städten, ist nach meiner Einschätzung die Definition korrekt angewendet.

Hast du die exakte Stelle für mich?
Stahlmann (2025-12-29 16:10:37+00:00): Uuuund eine Anmerkung: Ich sollte eigentlich konsequent Flächen mit Häusern mit mehreren Parteien exkludiert haben.
jengelh (2025-12-29 16:14:08+00:00): Hm ich hatte mich an
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:residential orientiert:
"Rural, mostly undeveloped residential landuse."

Aber undeveloped ist ein Stadtgebiet ja eigentlich schonmal überhaupt nicht.
Stahlmann (2025-12-30 09:40:00+00:00): Die Frage ist: Welche Definition der WIKI ist gültig? In der OSM DACH auf TG habe ich die Frage mal zur Diskussion gestellt. Im Ergebnis war die Änderung dann erstmal in der Form geblieben, sonst hätte ich das reverted.
AntMadeira (2025-01-07 20:56:12+00:00): Olá, dmbm6.

Reparei que adicionaste áreas residenciais ao Entroncamento e a Torres Novas.
Peço-te que reconsideres o uso desta etiqueta para cobrir grandes povoações como vilas e cidades. Ao fazê-lo, estás a incluir muitas outras áreas que não são residenciais. Esta é uma violação de uma das regras básicas do OSM, que é a de não mapear para o render, motivo pelo qual esta etiqueta é polémica neste tipo de uso. Ela deve ser apenas usada para abranger áreas de blocos de prédios e/ou residências, não para povoados inteiros.
Peço-te que edites ou revertas estas alterações.

Se precisares de ajuda, estou ao dispor.

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
dmbm6 (2025-01-10 18:13:38+00:00): como consigo editar uma área assim grande? só consigo eliminar a área completa se tiver toda visivel, mas a área é grande, não "cabe" assim toda visível
AntMadeira (2025-01-10 22:31:38+00:00): Dá para fazer, mas no iD é mais complicado. Eu vou reverter (elimina o que fizeste neste conjunto de edições) que é mais fácil.
Obrigado e boas edições.
czebureks (2025-05-31 18:55:06+00:00): Hej! Fajnie, że tak szczegółowo zmapowałeś ogrody, ale chyba je trzeba trochę poprzycinać, żeby nie zajmowały terenów takich jak np. podjazdy do garaży czy inne drogi serwisowe na posesjach. Myślę, że domy wolnostojące też nie powinny być częścią "ogrodu". Pozdrawiam
SMAV (2025-02-06 12:06:31+00:00): انواع سواری مخصوص بین شهری رانندگان حرفه ای
muralito (2025-01-08 01:48:19+00:00): Hola. Si hay limites distintos tendrias que poner el correspodiente en cada sentido, con maxspeed:forward y maxspeed:backward. Ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed
dreua (2025-01-07 18:45:11+00:00): ... and fix my previous mistake on Zitadellenweg.
salma_z (2025-01-09 08:12:05+00:00): Hello Agadir_edits;
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap in Morocco,
I noticed you Deleted the streets.
Link for deleted streets:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1291288634
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/91052910
I saw the latest satellite image the date is ( 2025-01-01) these streets
 are still there and working, And you made some roads "Floating".
Link for Floating streets :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1290907334
Could you provide us with the source you used to Delete these streets?
Regards
salma_z
無限の刃 (2025-06-28 05:20:17+00:00): You violated "On the Ground Rule"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes#On_the_Ground_Rule
I recommend you quit editing in Japan. Because you can't read Japanese comment.
mueschel (2025-06-28 07:08:19+00:00): I'm very well able to understand what was written there, but it doesn't describe the common tagging practice. On a highway, the 'name' tag refers to the name of the highway and 'bridge:name' is the name of the bridge if it is not mapped separately. There's nothing about which name is more prominently shown on signs.
無限の刃 (2025-07-02 08:43:45+00:00): Be aware my edits is in conformity with OSM rule. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes#On_the_Ground_Rule
Almost roads in Japan don't have highway name. It is just operator and reference number. 東海道 is not currently road name but used in places because it is popular.
If we follow our policy, we need input bridge or tunnel name to name key. If we follow your opinion, we need input bridge or tunnel name to name key too because national routes use them as highway name.
By the way, what source of your this opinion? "There's nothing about which name is more prominently shown on signs." Almost known national routes in Japan are differ your opinion.
無限の刃 (2025-08-07 12:11:19+00:00): I believed Your rule isn't common osm rule. I was wrong. However "On the Ground Rule" is still correct.
>"Interstate 5 southbound lanes" : do not separately name parts of the same object where they are separate in OSM, but not outside of OSM.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
mavl (2025-01-08 05:07:52+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удаляет данные. Например:    
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5285381218/history  
  
Этот пакет правок будет отменён.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_practice
noliver (2025-02-06 05:18:32+00:00): Hey there. I noticed that between the two of us, we seem to have added the same camera twice. I added it a bit east of where you have it, but all I had was memory and a very blurry photo that may have been geotagged poorly. Do you have anything better to confirm the correct location? If you do, feel free to delete the one I added.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12464269099
tsbischof (2025-02-06 13:38:58+00:00): That camera location was based on memory (no proper geotag) so if you have a picture that is probably better for correlation. I am no longer in the area so I cannot confirm anything but can reach out to some locals to get more information.
noliver (2025-02-06 16:45:15+00:00): My photo is tagged at 45.565940, -122.215915, but it's so dark, all you can see is that there's a guard rail.  The more I think, though, I think that those are bad coordinates.  And it may be moot - there's a news article about them needing to move the camera because they don't have permits for the initial location in WSDOT right-of-way ( https://www.kgw.com/article/news/local/technology/wsdot-orders-flock-safety-cameras-removed/283-061bbad5-64b0-4990-bbd4-1faaee467e13 ).  For what it's worth, the article identifies the old location as MP 22.90, which would be on the other side of marble road, just west of where you tagged it.  That location matches my memory better than the location I initially put it at.  I've deleted my node and moved your node to what I think is the original location based on the above, with a fixme note.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162215555

But if you have a local contact, they're supposedly moving it soon/have recently moved it somewhere to the east of the original location.  I'm also no longer in the area and don't have local contacts I'd trust to be able to safely and accurately report on this.
rempshaener (2025-01-07 19:34:03+00:00): Auch hier: besser aus https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/140645695 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1349278183 nur einen way machen.
streckenkundler (2025-01-08 20:58:02+00:00): Guten Abend,

bitte peinlich genau aufpassen!

Im Bereich kurz vor der Ortslage Kolrep hast du bei der L145 ein Straßensegment versehentlich gelöscht. ACHTUNG: Das ist aber nicht dein Fehler!!! Du arbeitest mit iD. Dieser Editor hat in bestimmten Situationen seine Probleme mit den Daten. Vor allem, wenn Linien mit Flächen verklebt sind... Du hast dankenswerterweise diese Verklebungen gelöst, Flächen von Linien getrennt! Großes Danke dafür. Beim Editor iD kommt es aber hingegen gelegentlich vor, daß Daten gelöscht werden, ohne daß der Bearbeiter oder die Bearbeiterin es merkt!

Wenn du  magst, schau dir mal JOSM an: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/

Ich persönlich kann es nur wärmstens empfehlen!

Im übrigen bin ich auf diesen Fehler durch die Auswertung der Fahrradknotenpunktnetze gestoßen. Für die Prignitz: https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/network/7787125

Grüße,

streckenkundler
streckenkundler (2025-01-08 20:59:28+00:00): Ach ja, vergessen... Straße mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161147707 repariert.