piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2024-03-05 14:48:37+00:00): Dag WF   Je vraagt feedback 
Meestal gebruik ik disused:highway als het alleen is afgesloten met bv takkenbossen/boomstammen.

Is er niets meer van het pad te zien, dan kan het net zo goed weg.
MVG
eggie
Supaplex030 (2024-03-07 10:24:01+00:00): Hallo Lukas Bo,

herzlich Willkommen bei OSM!

Du hast hier den Emmauswald als Punkt mit der Eigenschaft "Park" ergänzt. Parks oder Wälder stellen wir in OSM üblicherweise als Fläche dar und da es bereits eine Waldfläche dafür gab, habe ich den Namen auf diese übertragen und den Punkt wieder entfernt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/913601070

Falls du Fragen zum Mappen mit OSM hast, kannst du dich gern an mich wenden!

Viel Spaß beim mappen,
Alex
Xvtn (2024-03-05 15:31:44+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Everything seems great to me - Thanks for your contributions!
fortera_au (2024-03-04 22:44:56+00:00): Hey there, nice work, I'd just recommend clicking on each building after you've added it and pressing the Q button to square them off!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148227888
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-04 22:43:45+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 148217100, 148217778, 148218134, 148218220, 148218289, 148218473, 148218554, 148218770, 148219021, 148219339, 148219725, 148219904, 148220804, 148220846, 148220892, 148220972, 148221027, 148221379, 148221672, 148221723, 148221874, 148222005.
SomeoneElse (2024-03-04 23:06:58+00:00): As well as the Selby end, I've also walked bits further east.
gurglypipe (2024-03-06 15:43:26+00:00): Why make this change? It doesn’t seem to comply with the flow chart on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dhalt
phodgkin (2024-03-07 20:52:36+00:00): Yes, the stops at Kirkhaugh and Linley Halt are very specifically identified as halts by the South Tynedale Railway. It is a useful and used distinction on this railway.
DaveF (2024-03-10 16:02:13+00:00): From what I can gather (people don't reply to my enquiries), the data in the graphic was invented by a few German rail enthusiasts. I've struggled to find any information that it's a wide spread interpretation (even in Germany). In the GB discussions no one had any comprehension of it. It's ridiculous to determine the busyness/size of a station by "where trains can change from one track to another track."
There's so much wrong with that graphic:
Misunderstands what a siding is. 
Almost all (all?) multi-track stations have crossovers nearby.
A nearby junction has no bearing whatsoever. 

You'd have thought this page would mention it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_railway_station_categories 

@phodgkin What is the officially agreed demarcation line between a halt & a station? Name one that you perceive as a halt, but if the criteria you use to determine it increased slightly would make it a station? Likewise, name a station that would become a halt if your criteria reduced?
phodgkin (2024-03-12 18:56:31+00:00): The fact that the operator calls it a halt? It's a common pattern on preserved railways to distinguish between "full service" stations catering to tourists (i.e. with a car park) and "only a halt" where the only expected customers are walkers.
Linley and Kirkhaugh are designated halts by the South Tynedale, Kingfisher by the Weardale.

But frankly, the definition of a halt is beside the point. My irritation is with overriding the work done by local mappers based on individual opinion. It doesn't sit well with a collaborative project.
gurglypipe (2024-03-12 22:53:52+00:00): I’ve reverted the change as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148569986: the fact that the operator calls them halts, not stations, seems pretty bulletproof to me.
gurglypipe (2024-03-15 11:44:04+00:00): You appear to have re-added the changes as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148664413, again changing halt → station.

In retrospect I realise I should have been more selective in my revert and not wiped out the rest of your changeset (which does contain some other small changes apart from halt → station). Apologies for that.

Unilaterally making the halt → station changes again and not mentioning it here feels a bit unconstructive to the discussion, to me.

How do you reconcile the tagging (as station) with the fact that the operator calls these ‘halts’?
gurglypipe (2024-03-17 09:16:04+00:00): No response to that point of the discussion, so I’ve changed the three station nodes back to railway=halt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148762569.
trigpoint (2024-03-17 11:56:23+00:00): @DaveF
> Almost all (all?) multi-track stations 
> have crossovers nearby. 
Not really related to this, but has become interesting this week as apparently neither Wellington nor Telford Central have crossovers nearby which is preventing Shrewsbury-Wellington or Wolverhampton-Telford trains. They can run Wolverhapton to Shifnall.
DaveF (2024-03-17 23:53:07+00:00): (My replies are asterisked)

The fact that the operator calls it a halt? 

* The name is irrelevant to defining an object, it could be named 'Joe Bloggs'. Naming it 'halt' doesn't define what a halt is. 

It's a common pattern on preserved railways to distinguish between "full service" stations catering to tourists (i.e. with a car park) and "only a halt" where the only expected customers are walkers.

* "With a car park". See? Yet another subjective, personal interpretation of the meaning of the word 'halt'. Classifying all railway stations as 'railway=station' & adding fact-based sub tags, such as 'usage=tourism' & 'request_stop=yes' etc. removes ambiguity, making the OSM database more accurate.

But frankly, the definition of a halt is beside the point.

* No it's not. The very basis of OSM is how objects are defined. The whole wiki is a list of definitions. That 'halt' is provably subjective sits badly within OSM.

My irritation is with overriding the work done by local mappers based on individual opinion.

* It was undertaken after discussion on Talk-Gb
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2020-January/024096.html
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2020-February/thread.html#24097

* Some concurred, some gave additional details, no one objected. 

* Changing them from station to halt was performed unilaterally, overriding the work performed by contributors. 

It doesn't sit well with a collaborative project.

* It was a collaboration.

* I note the Wikipedia pages describe them as 'railway stations'
SomeoneElse (2024-03-05 00:18:09+00:00): I've also fixed a lot of the other former colliery railways that I've walked that are connected over towards Clipstone.  There's a lot of duplication still to get rid of - and I suspect a resurvey wouldn't come amiss, since I did most of it around 10 years ago.
SomeoneElse (2024-03-05 00:24:19+00:00): There are two Skegby Trail relations and there probably shouldn't be, but it'd need someone to check the signage to see if the longer version could be "stood up".
George Sears (2024-03-05 16:43:58+00:00): Salve Andrea,
al numero di partita IVA va anteposto il codice paese, quindi in pratica sarebbe così: "IT07576560721".
Saluti, Giuseppe
silversurfer83 (2024-03-05 06:56:21+00:00): Huhu :)

wenn du auf meine Nachrichten reagieren würdest, könnten wir versuchen hier eine Lösung zu finden :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148228918
HBanu (2024-03-05 00:42:26+00:00): Awesome work. Keep map well. 
Thank you.
InsertUser (2024-03-09 00:53:33+00:00): This "casa" seems to be bigger than most continents.
Bienson (2024-03-05 21:17:20+00:00): Öffnungszeiten sollten natürlich mit englischen Tageskürzeln eingetragen werden.

https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/
Miller24 (2024-03-06 01:08:46+00:00): Besser so?
Bienson (2024-03-07 22:25:23+00:00): Definitiv!
Miller24 (2024-03-07 22:56:00+00:00): Hätt'ste auch selber machen können. ;-)
Aber Danke - hab ich wieder was gelernt.
cserpell (2024-03-05 22:56:25+00:00): Hola, gracias por los aportes. No sé si deberíamos dejar el nombre en esos jardines, ya que son patios internos de los edificios, pero no creo que tengan un nombre oficial o comúnmente conocido.
josmougn (2024-06-11 14:45:05+00:00): bonjour,
En regardant si ces notes 1892582, 1892593 et 1892598 avaient été prises en compte (il semble que oui) j'ai constaté quelques "incohérences" sur les ways que vous avez mis à jour, par exemple celui-ci : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/684651239 :
- Avec highway=cycleway c'est inutile car redondant d'ajouter bicycle=designated (valeur par défaut)
- foot=no à proscrire, à moins d'un panneau sur place c'est contraire au code de la route qui autorise les piétons à marcher sur une piste cyclable en l'absence de trottoir (ne rien mettre, ou bien tracer le trottoir à côté s'il y en a un, ou ajouter foot=yes)
- segregated=no un peu bizarre avec foot=no mais deviendra utile si foot=yes

Bonne continuation,
José
fortera_au (2024-03-05 00:50:17+00:00): Hi, this should be tagged as a service road, not a residential road.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148229656
fortera_au (2024-03-05 00:48:43+00:00): Hi, this highway appears to go straight through a fence/barrier of some kind according to Mapbox imagery, are you able to verify if this road actually exists/is connected in this way? If the road does exist, it doesn't look like it's been drawn correctly, it should be closer to a right angle to the road with a bit of a kink in it from what I can see.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148229663
mikimapbuilder (2024-03-07 10:17:28+00:00): Hello fortera_au, thank you for pointing this out, changes have been made accordingly.
HBanu (2024-03-05 00:44:48+00:00): Hello !
The road is digitize very fine. 
Keep mapping.
Thank you
Ewen Hill (2024-03-06 11:57:13+00:00): Hi, this appears to be private driveway and not a service road. Please mark it as a driveway with access=private please.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148229688
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-03 10:29:00+00:00): 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/745520756

Is Tomorrowland really a separate theme park? It seems that it is only in section of actual single theme park
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-04 06:51:47+00:00): I have reverted this edit as these are not separate theme parks - but sections of one large theme park
SomeoneElse (2024-03-05 05:19:10+00:00): Hello,
Please use descriptive chamgeset comments that explain what you actually did, not just hashtags.
It helps other mappers to understand what you have actually done 
Best Regards,
Andy
MxxCon (2024-03-07 04:10:45+00:00): Rather than just a generic post office tag, there's a more precise preset for USPS post office.
Also, perhaps Cathedral Station is more suitable for the branch= tag rather than name=?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148231025
Robin Zyx (2024-03-07 04:35:19+00:00): Cathedral Station was what it was labeled before I decided to try mucking about with it, and it is indeed what is carved into the stone above the entrance. So I left it that way. I did consider whether I ought to change the name to say "USPS Cathedral Station".

Okay, I see that the post office by the Natural History Museum is tagged differently and the USPS logo shows up in its info. Looks like that because it's been tagged with operator= USPS?
Robin Zyx (2024-03-07 04:36:50+00:00): No, I see that the Cathedral Station PO also has operator=USPS.

Or did you just add that?
MxxCon (2024-03-07 04:40:26+00:00): Yes, I updated it to use USPS post office preset, which added operator tags.
Robin Zyx (2024-03-11 19:59:23+00:00): I just explicitly put the P.O. name back in the name field. Otherwise, the OSM website interface shows no name at all on the post office, just the icon. This is the main post office for the zip code, so it merits its name being seen.

There are a couple post offices further south in the UWS that I think the names are missing, but they may be places that relocated into newer buildings. The Ansonia station for example is about 4 blocks from the Ansonia.
MxxCon (2024-03-11 20:07:19+00:00): Be thoughtful when doing such changes just so that they show up on a map of your choice because that's approaching https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
Robin Zyx (2024-03-11 20:17:14+00:00): I'm aware of that. I've been using several different OSM apps on my phone when I'm out and about, and whoa, are they all different.
tastrax (2024-03-05 09:39:52+00:00): Hi dexgps,

AED's should be entered as emergency=defibrillator https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Ddefibrillator
fortera_au (2024-03-05 05:06:27+00:00): I reckon Crittenden Road could possibly be classed as tertiary, but Coventry Road looks good to me.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148232861
ablevi202 (2024-03-05 05:12:57+00:00): Yeah I was thinking it could be tertiary too. Before it was a residential road and the western part of Crittenden Road is also residential (and been that way for years), so I thought it was better to trust it and retag it to residential.
fortera_au (2024-03-05 05:21:42+00:00): I'll see if I can take a detour and drive that way at some point, or see if we've got any street level imagery. It's kind of a feeder road, but also could be slow enough that residential fits better. Definitely not secondary though!
fortera_au (2024-03-05 05:22:26+00:00): And yeah, definitely better to revert to the previous one if you're not sure, pretty sure that's been the consensus so far with these ones.
Xvtn (2024-03-05 15:29:37+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Everything looks great to me! Here are a couple tips.
- You can select a feature like a building and press "Q" to square up the corners. (With a complex shape like this hotel, you might need to square it up, adjust a bit, then square again.) Squaring corners isn't necessary, but it just makes things look a little nicer.
- AFAIK it's fine to have address tags on an entrance node, but I'd consider it best to move those tags to the hotel feature itself.

Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contributions!
kitto33 (2024-03-09 00:55:12+00:00): Please be careful in the future, you moved a bus stop by 400 meters onto the wrong road
kitto33 (2024-03-22 19:01:14+00:00): social_facility=* is not appropriate for Rudder Theater, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:social_facility
use amenity=theatre instead
Кочкин (2024-03-05 08:37:50+00:00): Добавить две улицы в графу дорог.
sahilister (2024-03-05 13:29:45+00:00): Hello jonathan maan, 
Welcome aboard and happy to see you people mapping IIT BHU in such details. I just want to highlight that
"advertisement board iit bhu" can't be marked as natural=wetland (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=wetland) because the building/POI isn't a wetland. Please add appropriate tags.

You can always consult OpenStreetMap wiki for finding the relevant tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page

Cheers!
sahilister
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-05 05:50:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9609043270
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11257545259
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1257696504
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1044263959

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-20 11:16:51+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11693100773/history has shop = sweet that was added in this edit
shop=sweet ? What kind of shop, if any is here?

is it shop=confectionery ? or is something else matching?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=confectionery
Maybe the current value should be documented as good shop value worth using?
TrickyFoxy (2024-03-05 17:07:17+00:00): Кажется вы случайно убрали тег, который показывает, что это дорога. Вернул
TrickyFoxy (2024-03-05 17:08:04+00:00): Кстати, что значит погарельник?
TrickyFoxy (2024-03-05 17:04:13+00:00): Для тестов есть такое https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-05 07:00:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11693153535
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11693153534
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373352691
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373352663

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
literan (2025-11-24 14:58:45+00:00): trunk должен оканчиваться на объездной

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification#%D0%9E%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B8_%D0%B2%D0%BD%D1%83%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B8_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D1%85_%D0%BF%D1%83%D0%BD%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2
habi (2024-03-05 07:39:21+00:00): Please try to make smaller changesets, especially if you're (only) editing two nodes in two different countries.
lapistano (2024-03-05 08:21:34+00:00): Certainly .. I just overlooked the first change. Usually there are changes to one node at a time. sorry for that.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-02 13:21:08+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11693232226/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
ph4ni (2025-07-02 14:05:45+00:00): It is a cold storage to store Chilli produce
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-02 15:44:34+00:00): I retagged as

amenity=warehouse
check_date=2024-03-05
description=It is a cold storage to store Chilli produce

and mapped building
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-18 16:15:35+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11693235942/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
ph4ni (2025-04-20 08:00:10+00:00): It is a service center for Trucks of brand "Ashok Leyland"

fixme:type
  	Ashok Leyland service
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-23 11:17:56+00:00): so it is place where you would repair trucks, right?
ph4ni (2025-05-23 13:29:09+00:00): yes. EveryDoor does not have presets for Truck Dealer or Truck service does it?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-24 11:08:12+00:00): it seems so

iD presets used by iD do not have them

there is https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/issues/1213 for shop=truck=repair

I see no such issue for shop=truck, I guess it can be raised
alexnder (2024-03-05 20:44:28+00:00): vezi că exista deja un punct pentru numărul 44, dacă l-ai pus și pe clădire l-ai duplicat.
rarad74 (2024-03-05 12:59:35+00:00): Salut. te rog NU  mai edita aiurea. verifica mai intai daca exista adresele , apoi pune toate tag-urile necesare. Nu este suficient sa pui doar numarul adresei langa strada. Este obligatoriu sa pui si numele strazii cu tag-ul addr: street, ca sa iti poata gasi acea adresa la cautare.
literan (2024-03-09 12:23:30+00:00): вы неверно вносите адреску. Ознакомьтесь с принятым форматом адреса (здесь исправлю). 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2

Если не прислушаетесь, придется ограничить ваши возможности правок.
rarad74 (2024-03-05 08:47:49+00:00): Date culese prin diverse mijloace in teren intre 2022- 2023.
woodpeck (2024-03-05 13:04:19+00:00): Wenn ein in OSM existierender Weg mit "access=no" unbenutzbar gemacht wird, bitte einen besseren Grund angeben als "Eigenschaften angepasst". Sind da Verbotsschilder vor Ort? Ist es ein Naturschutzgebiet und man darf da deshalb nicht laufen? Usw.
Negreheb (2024-03-05 14:01:43+00:00): Plus, access=no bedeutet, dass man physisch nicht mehr gehen **kann**, also niemand. Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

woodpeck war so nett und hat einen Thread im Forum aufgemacht, es wäre toll, wenn sich der Tourismusverband Großarltal dort melden kann, dann können wir das sicher rasch klären. :) https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wegsperrungen-durch-tourismusverband-grossarltal/110155
Frans S (2024-03-08 14:49:09+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Sometimes inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.
Nodes of buildings connected to other buildings.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148238061
dzamper (2024-03-05 08:16:30+00:00): Usunięcie admin_level w niektórych wybranych przez siebie relacjach bo mi się nieładnie mapa Raciborza wyświetla to nie jest rozwiązanie problemu.
Rozwiązanie problemu to jest zgłoszenie do twórców aplikacji że coś z nimi jest nie halo że mają w pompce sprawdzanie tagu boundary=administrative + ustalenie ze społecznością że jeśli nie można tego tagować w ten sposób to w jaki inny się powinno i przetagowanie *wszędzie*
Frans S (2024-03-09 10:11:52+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset (among others) is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)

Inaccurate mapped.

Buildings not squared.

Included shadow of a building.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148238488
Frans S (2024-03-09 11:03:13+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, buildings often not squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148238599