piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nevw (2025-05-12 21:50:51+00:00): Hi, this relation appears broken https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.20379&lat=-33.90528&zoom=18
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5700628#map=16/-33.90764/151.20832
Supt_of_Printing (2025-05-13 03:04:34+00:00): Hmm, not sure how that happened, but not sure how to fix it.
nevw (2025-05-13 03:08:51+00:00): I think TheSwavu might have fixed it
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2916624#map=13/-33.90825/151.19187
Supt_of_Printing (2025-05-13 03:17:05+00:00): Thanks
erickdeoliveiraleal (2025-05-18 21:16:56+00:00): poreque mudou para track? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291172188
raphaelmirc (2025-05-18 21:51:59+00:00): leia a documentação para via residencial. Via local, de fluxo baixo, dentro de área residencial, servindo de acesso às residências. Brasil: 

por isso é uma via track ou via local.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2025-05-18 21:56:29+00:00): unclassified seria mais adequado no caso, não track.
raphaelmirc (2025-05-18 22:15:28+00:00): e porque você não mapeou ? 

já corrigi a sua nota!
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:55:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:57:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:58:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
Udarian (2025-05-12 03:12:20+00:00): whats your source for this?
Evan Carroll (2025-05-14 05:10:19+00:00): It's an NCIS tag upgrade. The roof can be verified on Google Maps (but it's the same with 90% of the Farm Stores brands, that's how they franchise so cheap).
Evan Carroll (2025-05-14 05:10:57+00:00): https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/pull/10929/commits
Evan Carroll (2025-05-14 05:11:20+00:00): NSI tag upgrade*
Udarian (2025-05-14 20:37:29+00:00): we are not allowed to use google maps as sources as their license is not compliant with ours
Evan Carroll (2025-05-14 21:12:55+00:00): I didn't. I said you could. I did the right thing. You want to verify it, I'm telling you how you can verify it. But you can use any means at your disposal to verify anything. I used the force; I am a Jedi. I know what a Farm Store looks like.

I don't even understand your question. I knew that a building didn't cover a road, I made the footprint smaller, and put a roof over it. I'm done here. ;)
Evan Carroll (2025-05-14 21:14:57+00:00): You can see the source I used in the metadata, just fyi..


changesets_count	3003
created_by	iD 2.33.0
host	https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit
imagery_used	Bing Maps Aerial
locale	en-US
resolved:outdated_tags:noncanonical_brand	1
Udarian (2025-05-12 03:05:59+00:00): whats your source for this?
FajrAl (2025-05-13 02:49:44+00:00): halo, saya orang lokal di sini dan memetakan bangunan ini. Kenapa Anda memindahkan bangunannya? itu sebenarnya bukan bangunan, tapi building=roof
FajrAl (2025-05-14 01:25:47+00:00): in case if you don't understand Bahasa Indonesia even a translation machine exist:

Hello, I am a local person here and mapped this building. Why did you move the building? That's actually roof building covering the road.
LimpopoRiver (2025-05-15 06:06:53+00:00): Hello FajrAl, thanks for reaching out! My intention with this edit was to prevent the building from intersecting road, I now see the tags that indicate this road passes under the building. I’ve typically seen covered roads modeled by splitting the road at the entry and exit points of the building, and tagging just the covered section of road with covered=yes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered). Would you be open to me updating the modeling to reflect this approach? 
Happy mapping!
FajrAl (2025-05-15 07:10:27+00:00): The roof building didn't intersect the road, it overlapping the road. It is fine and no error in iD. If it is moved, it doesn't reflect the existing condition. The covered=yes is good addition, but please revert the roof placement.
LimpopoRiver (2025-05-16 02:29:56+00:00): Done, have a nice day!
mavl (2025-05-12 15:07:02+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, где здесь железнодорожный переезд?  
И зачем вы поменяли тип дороги на тропинку?
mavl (2025-05-18 05:33:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166416092 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, wrong data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17683].
yelisey90 (2025-05-12 09:55:06+00:00): rv - the segment contains turn lanes, should be fixed differently

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166143149
Kovoschiz (2025-05-12 04:20:25+00:00): The `=service` road obviously doesn't connect with the `=footway` . I haven't edited whether it's for Wu Chung House's carpark, loading zone, or private.
marczoutendijk (2025-08-20 18:07:43+00:00): Landuse=2
What's that supposed to indicate?

Best regards  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Johnny Carlsen (2025-08-31 17:06:46+00:00): That is a mistake and can be removed.
Johnny Carlsen (2025-08-31 17:11:35+00:00): Looking at it a bit more, I can tell it should have been "lanes=2".
Johnny Carlsen (2025-08-31 17:14:33+00:00): It should be fixed now.
marczoutendijk (2025-08-31 17:58:27+00:00): Thanks!
maxwellward (2026-05-05 22:48:04+00:00): Hi there, it looks like you added an ALPR to the centre node of this intersection.

There doesn't appear to be a post or pole overhanging the centre of this intersection. Do you know exactly where this ALPR actually is?

Thanks,
Max
Frans S (2025-05-12 08:22:04+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
difficult to get the picture of a building. 
Many rooftops, different hights and shadows , large and small<
This building is a fair square block. Map it over the rooftop and move it to its footprint (visible in the shadow)

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166132642
Frans S (2025-05-12 08:23:13+00:00): Here is the link to your mapping, and the adjustment I made.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166138917
Best regards
mavl (2025-05-18 05:33:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166416092 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, wrong data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17683].
Frans S (2025-05-12 08:27:50+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping.

B: Overlapping buildings.
C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
E: Buildings not squared.
G: Included the shadow of the building.
High building(s) incorrect mapped. See par 20 chapter About Buildings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
TheSwavu (2025-05-13 11:21:58+00:00): Is there a reason you disconnected https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/980809661 from Dalton Drive? It seems unlikely that a shopping centre would not have a way for customers to drive into and out of their car park.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-17 05:20:05+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18226
silversurfer83 (2025-05-12 20:01:46+00:00): Hi :)

da würde mich interessieren, welches Verkehrszeichen denn genau hier den Zugang regelt. Hier wäre eine Übersicht:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Verkehrszeichen_in_Deutschland
Dieses Wissen hilft hier die Zugangsberechtigungen sauber zu setzen.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166133516
ToTo_GSA_Rider (2025-05-12 20:15:33+00:00): Hi,

weißes Schild mit rotem Kreis und Fahrrad frei darunter. Du kannst es gerne noch anpassen, wenn du möchtest.
silversurfer83 (2025-05-12 20:02:38+00:00): Hier die gleiche Frage. Da es scheinbar eine Höchstgeschwindigkeit gibt, wäre die genaue Beschilderung hilfreich. Danke
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166133569
ToTo_GSA_Rider (2025-05-12 20:16:38+00:00): Es war durchgehend 30. Bitte anpassen, falls ich da was vergessen haben sollte.
silversurfer83 (2025-05-12 20:19:48+00:00): Hi

danke für die schnelle Reaktion.

Ich meinte außer der Beschränkung auf 30 die genaue Beschilderung der Einschränkung des Verkehrs. Ich kann mir kaum vorstellen, dass ein Weg, der nur für Fahrräder und Fußgänger frei ist ein Tempolimit hat.
ToTo_GSA_Rider (2025-05-12 20:25:24+00:00): Doch, war so. Ich sag ja, das war alles total komisch, da ja die Routenplanung mit einer Software Aufgrund falscher Informationen gegriffen hat. Vielleicht wurden die Schilder nie abgebaut.
evgenykatyshev (2025-05-12 15:41:31+00:00): Добрый день! Вы в итоге создали целых 4 кафе вместо одного. Вам надо объединить всю информацию о кафе на одной точке, а 3 другие удалить.
Валентин Ка (2025-05-13 06:32:23+00:00): Здравствуйте. Не могу пока разобраться как это сделать
evgenykatyshev (2025-05-13 07:45:43+00:00): Я объединил. Для этого можно было просто перетащить одну точку на другую, тогда они становятся ожной точкой с общими свойствами.
Валентин Ка (2025-05-13 08:32:07+00:00): Спасибо. Сейчас кафе будет видно всем?
evgenykatyshev (2025-05-13 08:57:00+00:00): Да. В разных приложениях карты обновляются с разной периодичностью, но делать больше ничего не нужно — только ждать.
Валентин Ка (2025-05-13 16:09:59+00:00): спасибо!
Piskvor (2025-05-12 08:43:21+00:00): Interesting. Definitely did not see that from the southern end ~a month ago, there's even a cycling signpost directing onto that road. I'm aware of the explicit-foot-only paths there, even mapped them, e.g. here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/189081745 , so this is quite a surprise.

Anyway, I must have missed this - thanks for the update.
Eino81 (2025-05-12 08:50:08+00:00): Yeah, I came from the Northern end, it was clear there, and then I wanted to check the Southern end, the sign was there as well, as also on Street View, here: https://www.google.com/maps/@50.0381837,14.6416968,3a,19.2y,69.93h,89.71t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sO-k3wp04XxlS-ai5--AEvQ!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D0.2940043882962442%26panoid%3DO-k3wp04XxlS-ai5--AEvQ%26yaw%3D69.92771028713847!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDUwNy4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
Piskvor (2025-05-12 08:54:57+00:00): My bad, sorry.

Arriving from the east, I probably got confused by the preceding sign, which notes "cycling routes blah blah turn right," but likely means the next turn, K Markétě: https://mapy.cz/zakladni?pid=105210093&newest=1&yaw=5.339&fov=0.760&pitch=0.144&x=14.6421064&y=50.0381496&q=u%20markety&z=17&ovl=8
Eino81 (2025-05-12 09:20:44+00:00): No problem. :) (I have also many mistakes...) Yes, the next street is definitely a bike road.
mavl (2025-05-18 05:33:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166416092 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, wrong data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17683].
silversurfer83 (2025-05-12 20:06:17+00:00): Hi :)

find ich gut, dass du hier nachfasst.

Eine Sache: Die Rotunde selbst kann eigentlich kein "Park" sein. Die Karlsaue ist schon ein Park und innerhalb des Parks gibt es eigentlich keine weiteren.

Guck mal hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shelter_type%3Dpavilion
Trifft es das vielleicht? Sonst klick dich mal durch die Links in dem Artikel.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166134821
Triggertrix (2025-05-13 07:29:17+00:00): Sodele, ich denke jetzt sollte es passen. Danke für die Unterstützung. Ich denke ich habe jetzt auch das richtige Tool das zu machen.
woodpeck_repair (2025-05-12 10:14:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166144045 where the changeset comment is: remove bad import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17676
YuliyaSurta (2025-05-12 06:26:08+00:00): Wrong source was mentioned. Used Bing Maps Aerial as evidence.
BikeBarian (2025-06-12 11:41:26+00:00): Nie wiem czy byłeś tam w terenie czy tylko używałeś cieniowania żeby wytrasować ścieżkę ale usunąłem wcześniej tą trasę bo jak byłem tam w terenie to praktycznie nie ma tam już żadnej ścieżki. Jest tylko na początku od jeziora do góry i potem już las...
fos design (2025-06-18 19:47:56+00:00): Byłem w terenie. Zdecydowanie wyraźna na tyle by oznaczyć.
tastrax (2025-05-12 10:09:26+00:00): Hi Bonnie - I intend reverting this change and instead add tagging indicating its not a public site
Bonnie Ferguson (2025-05-13 01:18:54+00:00): Hi, please don't have any tagging or anything at this location and any information needs to be complete removed and not made public. The site will be removed completely, so there will not be anything at the location. Therefore, any information will cause confusion.
user_5359 (2025-05-13 09:59:15+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/12829736784. What is the mean of the tags
زنجان = ابهر
صائین قلعه = کشاورزی

And please write better comments!
eggie (2025-05-12 08:13:10+00:00): Dag Merlin,

Tip  Je kunt ook het tracktype in vullen. Dat maakt uit voor de routering.
gravel is tracktype=grade2
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:tracktype

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-12 08:14:13+00:00): Ah... de tracktype staat al ingevuld...  Mooi. ...grade3 kan ook.
Merlingraphy (2025-05-12 09:05:51+00:00): Thanks, had ik even gemist. Is inderdaad grade 3 denk ik, lag echt vrij grof. Volgens mij is het onlangs opnieuw bedekt met een laag gravel/steenslag.
Aetolia (2025-05-12 18:53:19+00:00): Compliments of the Albanian government's Official Geospatial office ASIG.  Dont change the Greek Albanian Delimitation Borders what you are doing is not legal. 
"ASIG (Autoriteti Shtetëror për Informacionin Gjeohapësinor) is focused on presenting the geospatial data and services provided by the responsible public authorities, as defined by law no. 72/2012, "On the Organization and Functioning of the National Infrastructure of Geospatial Information in the Republic of Albania". ASIG's main objective is the creation of a geodetic framework to enable the support of a unique map covering the territory of Albania. Through its geoportal, it aims to establish a national infrastructure geospatial database that is accessible to anyone. Note that The State Authority for Geospatial Information (ASIG) (Albanian: Autoriteti Shtetëror për Informacionin Gjeohapësinor) is an Albanian state owned central agency responsible for surveying, mapping and land registering the territory of the Republic of Albania
 https://akpt.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=ff270e99f5be45f19c7b7a1e3e618b27
Official Albanian Military Topographical maps: https://shop.geospatial.com/publication/38PCREFVGPMH4RPD0MSAVZHMV6/Albania-1-to-100000-Scale-Topographic-Maps see also, https://shop.geospatial.com/publication/0K48DGWKGBQ44E21WWYBAJKMS7/Albania-1-to-50000-Scale-Topographic-Maps
Official Hellenic Geographical Service: https://shop.geospatial.com/publication/8S7S7J39TQXX4QADMPWT4Q9CC4/Greece-1-to-50000-Scale-Topographic-Maps
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-13 07:47:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47831423 - are you sure those are now fully-sized trees? Rather than bushes?
EM311 (2026-01-13 09:07:08+00:00): sorry, is repaired
user_5359 (2025-05-13 09:49:20+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/12829766328 (one of three objects). What is the mean of the tag ابهر = صائین قلعه ?
Grass-snake (2025-05-13 04:50:21+00:00): Здравствуйте. Уточните пожалуйста, Вы скопировали эту дорогу из 2ГИС или Яндекса?
Пожалуйста, научитесь менять подложку, на Bing очень старые снимки, на Esri более новые, дорога нарисована не там, где она есть на самом деле.
Grass-snake (2025-05-14 05:52:23+00:00): Исправил как посчитал нужным: дорога была нарисована криво, оказалось проще удалить и нарисовать заново. Если будет свободное время, уточню.
user_5359 (2025-05-13 08:45:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your try to add your business, because this outside of Texas!
kadiwa (2025-05-13 10:49:38+00:00): Ich glaube, dieser Radweg (https://osm.org/way/1352383936) ist nicht benutzungspflichtig, oder? Die machen die Benutzungspflichten doch nur vor die Kreuzung.
ReinholdR (2025-05-15 09:22:27+00:00): Ich glaube auch, dass das Stück, dass du markiert hat nicht benutzungspflichtig ist. Daran habe ich aber nichts geändert. Ich habe nur den Verlauf der Freizeitroute 11 angepasst, weil jeweils vor der Kreuzung die Benutzungspflicht beginnt und man deshalb über die separate Fahrradfurt fahren muss und die allermeisten Freizeitradler eher dem Radweg folgen, als über den freien Rechtsabbieger auf die Fahrbahn fahren.
kadiwa (2025-05-15 10:04:18+00:00): Ich wollte die Änderung auch gar nicht groß kritisieren :) Im Gegenteil; danke für das Verbessern der Routenführung.
Ich meinte den Tag bicycle=use_sidepath, den du z. B. hier hinzugefügt hast: https://osm.org/way/950123215
(Ich hab das gerade nochmal angepasst)
ReinholdR (2025-05-15 10:40:57+00:00): Der sollte auch nur für forward gelten. Das ist mir durchgerutscht. 
Vielen Dank für die Korrektur.
Frans S (2025-05-12 10:35:48+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping. You often mapped a shadow line as the border of a building. Most often, the shadow hide the underlaying building. So make it part of the building.
C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
E: Buildings not squared.
G: Included the shadow of the building.
High building(s) incorrect mapped. See par 20 chapter About Buildings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
Michaall99 (2025-05-12 16:59:33+00:00): Dzień dobry, skąd tak konkretne opening_date? Pozdrawiam
Artur | Yanosik (2025-05-13 05:17:50+00:00): Witam, opening_date dałem orientacyjny, żeby za jakiś czas sprawdzić postępy. Wiem, że konkretnej daty nie podano, ale dzięki temu tagowi potem wyszukuję sobie sobie edycje do sprawdzenia.
mat (2025-05-13 05:14:18+00:00): Bonjour,
Est-ce que les deux voies d'accès au rond-point ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/295384934 sont toujours en travaux, ou sont-elles, comme le reste de la voie, ouvertes ?
Jean-Pierre Rondeau (2025-05-15 08:22:42+00:00): Bonjour,
Je viens de compléter la mise à jour des deux voies d'accès au rond-point qui sont effectivement en service depuis le 25 avril dernier.
Merci de votre signalement pertinent.
somehundred (2025-05-12 16:02:45+00:00): Lūdzu pavisam nedzēst ārā veikalus (shop) un ērtības (amenity), ja tie ir slēgti. Tā vietā pie galvenās birkas (veikaliem "shop=", ērtībām "amenity="), priekšā jāieliek "disused:". Šāda prakse noder tiem cilvēkiem, kuri vēlas zināt, kas konkrētajā vietā ir bijis pagātnē.

Dokumentācija: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:*
Nelabais (2025-07-01 13:53:11+00:00): Ahā, paldies, būs zināt!
richlv (2025-07-06 12:47:07+00:00): Tas laikam visvairāk noder kartētājiem, tādējādi samazinot risku, ka no veciem attēliem vēlreiz iezīmē kaut ko jau slēgtu.
ilias_ (2025-05-12 09:10:19+00:00): How is the *Moroccan* security wall disputed? The Sahara territory itself is disputed, but the wall isn't. No one is claiming the wall, as it was built and is operated by Morocco... If you look at the relation, most of it is not even in the southern part of Morocco and most of it is in the Northern part which is not disputed by anybody.
ilias_ (2025-05-13 20:11:18+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166222345
Hufkratzer (2025-05-12 20:44:58+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385736096 does not look like a riding centre (leisure=horse_riding). It looks like a riding arena. Maybe it belongs to a iding centre, maybe Anglesey Riding Centre (https://www.angleseyridingcentre.co.uk/). In OSM riding arenas are usually tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian.
See also:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260655662 (example)
Hufkratzer (2025-05-27 13:13:07+00:00): https://www.angleseyridingcentre.co.uk/contact-us/  ????????
Hufkratzer (2025-05-27 13:16:12+00:00): Sorry, the previous comment should have been a note to myself. I was investigating if this belongs together and couldn't find out.
Nia20 (2025-06-02 08:40:28+00:00): that's ok!
Alexis Giraud-Courtney (2025-05-13 10:56:29+00:00): Please do not revert this change I will fix the wikivoyage tag and delete it
maraf24 (2025-05-13 07:58:32+00:00): Nie jest to dobra edycja. Zarośla są w miejscu, w których ich na pewno nie ma. Na drodze przecież nie rosną.
silversurfer83 (2025-05-12 20:11:10+00:00): Hi :)

wenn du diese eine Spur als eignen way erfasst wäre es angebracht, du modellierst die ganze Kreuzung entsprechend und achtest dann gleich auf die korrekte Verwendung von "lanes" und "oneway=yes" und so weiter. So wie jetzt ist es nämlich suboptimal und die turnlanes stimmen nicht mehr.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166140656
archie (2025-05-12 09:11:40+00:00): Observera min cs och kommentaren: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166141339
archie (2025-05-12 09:14:01+00:00): Scrub-relationen har legat där en lång tid utan att ha varit ett problem. När du lägger en annan polygon över scrub-relationen är din slutsats att det är scrub-relationen som ger upphov till trasslet. Menar du allvar?
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-13 00:38:08+00:00): Если нарисовали парковку полигоном, то точечную стоит удалить
Erik Christiansson (2025-05-12 09:49:00+00:00): Tack!
archie (2025-05-12 09:56:43+00:00): Ingen orsak! Du var för snabb att radera "dina" våtmarker, så jag fick revertera din cs för att få fram dem igen. 
Vänligen kolla nu lösningen, så klarar du det nästa gång själv!