piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-10 13:45:35+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10979393516/history has building:name = Villa La Vicaria that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Is building:name for building name? In such case it would be much better to put it into name tag. If this object merges builing and POI inside such as museum or shop, then having separate objects for point of interest and building would be better idea, museum may have own area or node (see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element ).

If it is an inscription then it should use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:inscription

If that is not a building name - what you wanted express by this tagging?
Frans S (2023-06-16 08:56:47+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
 I am sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and hardly squared. Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. ( see attached document for more info)
A: * Multiple buildings have been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
E: Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* When buildings have L, U shape or protruding elements, they should be included into your mappings.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137385534
Frans S (2023-08-09 07:39:06+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
We welcome you as a new mapper
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
A: Not accurately drawn.
B: Overlapping buildings.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapping them as 1 building.
E. Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137385700
Frans S (2023-06-16 08:26:40+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137385753
Frans S (2023-06-16 08:27:49+00:00): Please use  the Maxar Premium Imagery as requested on this project.
Best regards
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-15 19:00:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9458841985
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289847

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10979384534
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10979384535
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182320086

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Didosa76 (2023-06-15 19:24:37+00:00): Dziękuję, poprawiłem to.
gemsquash (2023-06-19 19:38:58+00:00): please, not streets when they don't exist, welcome to namibia
Myazyk (2024-04-27 19:41:22+00:00): Не потрібно вказувати прізвища власників магазинів, а потрібно вказувати назви магазинів, як на вивісках
habi (2023-06-16 07:41:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10979461217 was added as a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/295941367/
I merged both barriers.
Makeena (2023-06-16 12:10:58+00:00): This is actually wrong. There is a parking space before those and there is a second barrier to pass directly to the house. Inbetween them, there is a piece of a wall, so they really are separate.
habi (2023-06-16 13:13:09+00:00): Sorry, I misinterpreted the lonesome node.
Reverted my merge with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137413944

But the barrier needs to be connected to a path or way to make ‚semantic‘ sense: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier
Such a way is missing here…
Makeena (2023-06-16 15:11:01+00:00): I don't know how to make an open space that is free to walk or, for the parking space, to drive. Beside the line with the gates, there are no obstacles present in this place. I don't think I have ever seen such a space on the map.
habi (2023-06-17 19:42:13+00:00): I would try to make it 'semantically' correct, e.g. add a path to the ping pong table, and add a service highway to the parking.
That there's no good way to pass between the ping pong table an the parking is - albeit based on the barrier - then mapped by the footway and service highway not being connected.
Makeena (2023-06-18 02:34:26+00:00): Why shouldnt they be connected? They are, there is no issue walking through the barriers.
Taya_S (2023-06-16 06:24:08+00:00): Hallo Jeff,

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Ik heb helaas deze changeset moeten terugdraaien. Het is in nederland niet de bedoeling om de adres nodes te veranderen, deze komen uit BAG en worden semi-automatisch bijgehouden. En het hotel dat je had toegevoegd stond al op de kaart maar op het deel van het gebouw dat aan de andere kant van de weg staat.
In het begin is alles lastig, dus laat dit je niet tegenhouden.

Groeten,
Taya
Taya_S (2023-06-16 06:27:04+00:00): Overigens stond het adres dat jij had gewijzigt er ook al in. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2713028726
RedAuburn (2023-06-15 19:47:35+00:00): That sounds best! thank you :)
Hannes Röst (2023-06-16 12:23:35+00:00): @JohnW11 I think you made a mistake here, you changed a large part of the Blue Nile river from water to sand. I suggest to revert this quickly.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-15 20:10:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10979505244

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
habi (2023-06-16 07:30:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182332777/ was not connected to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147046122/, I've updated this :)
habi (2023-06-16 07:31:33+00:00): And also not connected to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11787543/
Jens Willemsens (2023-06-15 20:29:08+00:00): Boundaries corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137388905
Jakka (2023-06-15 20:28:19+00:00): Is het volledige gebouw de vakantie woning? zoniet wordt volgens de regels deze op node/punt geplaatst.
Discostu36 (2023-09-08 20:47:34+00:00): Die Straße ist für Busse, Taxis und Fahrräder freigegeben und führt nicht zu einem Grundstück. Das ist doch kein Fall für highway=service
ottwiz (2023-06-15 20:28:29+00:00): I also splitted up the huge multipolygon into many smaller ones and mix-matched the existing forest landcover polygons and traced areas too
habi (2023-06-16 07:25:54+00:00): Here you've added a duplicate path to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/583999765/
I'm removing your addition and aligned the already present path a bit.
Eman_Mehrez (2023-06-18 08:16:15+00:00): Hello Abdullah Al Werfalli;
I noticed you added "oneway=reversible" and this tag will make Routing engines should not route over this type of oneway without knowing about oneway scheduled times.
and if you see KartaView Tracks this street is bi directions and there is no sign to add time for this street.
Please be careful when you added this tag to follow the rules of the Wiki OpenStreetMap.
Link kartaview:
https://kartaview.org/map/@31.75365175796452,14.019279533752524,18z
Link for the street:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386094025
I fixed this issue.
Regards
Eman_Mehrez
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-15 20:40:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532902017
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532902010

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Eman_Mehrez (2023-06-18 08:16:39+00:00): Hello Abdullah Al Werfalli;
I noticed you added "oneway=reversible" and this tag will make Routing engines should not route over this type of oneway without knowing about oneway scheduled times.
and if you see KartaView Tracks this street is bi directions and there is no sign to add time for this street.
Please be careful when you added this tag to follow the rules of the Wiki OpenStreetMap.
Link kartaview:
https://kartaview.org/map/@31.754628888875274,14.023464205788969,18z
Link for the street:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172981819
I fixed this issue.
Regards
Eman_Mehrez
Eman_Mehrez (2023-06-18 08:17:19+00:00): Hello Abdullah Al Werfalli;
I noticed you added "oneway=reversible" and this tag will make Routing engines should not route over this type of oneway without knowing about oneway scheduled times.
and if you see KartaView Tracks this street is bi directions and there is no sign to add time for this street.
Please be careful when you added this tag to follow the rules of the Wiki OpenStreetMap.
Link kartaview:
https://kartaview.org/map/@31.74598960616629,14.01556134296311,18z
Link for the street:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/763921532
I fixed this issue.
Regards
Eman_Mehrez
felipeeugenio (2023-06-16 18:06:13+00:00): Estimado. esto ya es un poco una burla. Por favor dejar de ingresar datos en mayúsculas. Hay que corregir todo lo que hace masivamente. Por favor lea algún mensaje de los que le mandamos.
edvac (2023-07-11 10:58:15+00:00): Estimado maaccaa,

Por favor, responde a las preguntas/preocupaciones de la comunidad de usuarios, en este caso del usuario felipeeugenio

Los nombres, en general, solo usan mayúsculas para la primera letra de cada palabra, y no de todas. Por favor, lee este wiki para más información: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Caracteres_en_may%C3%BAsculas

Un saludo cordial,

Rafael Avila Coya, Fundación OpenStreetMap, Data Working Group
edvac (2023-07-11 10:58:48+00:00): [Ticket#2023071110000093]
Eman_Mehrez (2023-06-18 08:17:42+00:00): Hello Abdullah Al Werfalli;
I noticed you added "oneway=reversible" and this tag will make Routing engines should not route over this type of oneway without knowing about oneway scheduled times.
and if you see KartaView Tracks this street is bi directions and there is no sign to add time for this street.
Please be careful when you added this tag to follow the rules of the Wiki OpenStreetMap.
Link kartaview:
https://kartaview.org/map/@31.74157,14.00552,18z
Link for the street:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/764461816
I fixed this issue.
Regards
Eman_Mehrez
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-15 21:00:18+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10979605488

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MxxCon (2023-06-26 00:15:15+00:00): Hello.
You once again make giant changesets with A LOT of incorrect tagging.
Once again, description= tag is NOT intended for you documenting or how or when you mapped something. It is intended as a description of a given feature.
Additionally, in virtually every single features you mapped you added a business as a wikidata proper of a feature. That is most definitely incorrect. It should be mapped as operator:wikidata.
It's been at least 10 days since your edit and you haven't fixed these errors.
Please correct them or your edits will be reverted in whole and your account forwarded to DWG, which might result in account block or even ban.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137389586
riverobserver (2023-06-26 01:13:42+00:00): Hi, I understand that First Energy is the main owner of JCPL however JCPL is a separate utility from its owner or main entity, I'm not including them as I'm trying to have a JCPL only map rather then lumping them in with the First Energy conglomerate.  So are you saying for the operator portion that it should be operator:wikidata instead of wikidata? If so I can work to fix that. I also understand what you are saying about the description I will work to fix both of those. Please advise if what i said was correct. Thanks
MxxCon (2023-06-26 11:33:55+00:00): wikidata= tag is for the feature itself.
operator:wikidata= tag is for the company, as the name implies.
A bunch of electrical wires is not a company... A company manages and operates them..

Another example let's say there's some notable building that has a wikidata article on it. Building's article would go into wikidata= tag and property owner or real estate company or management company would go into operator:wikidata=
riverobserver (2023-06-26 23:18:40+00:00): Ok I understand what you are saying it should be operator:wikidata
riverobserver (2023-06-26 23:22:29+00:00): I will be systematically going through to fix the bad errors I have made over the next week.
bxl-forever (2023-06-15 22:26:27+00:00): Hello,

I don’t think that "Kiran shop" is a bank.  It looks like you just filled an empty name on the map without looking at the type of shop.

I can fix it if you can tell me what you saw exactly here.

Thanks.
Keodono (2023-06-15 23:16:33+00:00): Hello,

Banks is ING.
Axa is in Auteuil is more an insurance group.
I think they moved. I saw a notice a few months ago.

Kiran shop is above Auteuil. Case 11

I was standing in front of the shop with my smartphone in my hand with street complete opened.

Anyway, Kiran shop definitively in case 11 abot Auteuil.

Thanks.
Keodono (2023-06-15 23:22:16+00:00): Sorry.
Not in case 11 But Kiran shop is just above.
Between 11 & 202

Case 11 seems to be a single family house.
bxl-forever (2023-06-16 07:54:17+00:00): Thanks for writing back.

Indeed, there are plenty of mistakes here, it’s fortunate we have very recent photo coverage on Mapillary.  (This is a free collection of pictures we did ourselves for OSM.)

Kiran is a convenience shop and it is in the same building as number 11 (one building with two doors: one private entrance and one for the store.

I did the necessary fixes.

Have a nice day.
user_18305684 (2023-06-19 23:08:53+00:00): Hi,

better with a tag name instead of natural.

I fixed it.

Best regards
ToniE (2023-06-20 07:42:41+00:00): Yeah thanks.

Always the problem with auto-completion in JOSM and me typing too fast:

ALT-A + na + TAB + Sauerlach

Best regards
Toni
user_18305684 (2023-06-24 16:38:07+00:00): https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/23021#ticket
user_18305684 (2023-06-28 18:18:21+00:00): Hi,

for several days Maxar didn't work on iD and Vespucchi editors (imagery is blurry everywhere).

What about JOSM ?

Best regards
Carto'Cité (2023-08-11 10:42:56+00:00): Bonjour Ben,
Je me permets de te contacter pour savoir si tu as observé une signalétique pour les DSC que tu as ajouté. C'est un peu curieux comme question mais cela arrive que des DSC soient ajoutés en l'absence de signalétique et il ne faut pas sauf cas très particuliers. Merci d'avance pour ton aide 🙂
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
bxl-forever (2023-06-15 22:34:19+00:00): Hello,

I see you tagged most buildings here as "apartment" buildings.

On the following set of pictures we took (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=237234365385252) it appears that most houses on Rue Van Kalck/Van Kalckstraat are single-family houses.

The purpose of this quest is StreetComplete was precisely to accurately distinguish between apartment buildings and ordinary houses.  Putting inaccurate or incorrect information our database defeats this objective.

Would you mind having a second look at your changes?
Keodono (2023-06-15 23:18:45+00:00): Hello,

I will check again but most of the houses in this street are appartements.

I will double check again just to be sure.
Taya_S (2023-06-17 07:36:26+00:00): Hallo Marklammers,

Je vraagt om Feedback, maar zo te zien is iemand anders mij voor geweest met het aanpassen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137409793

De access tags hebben niet veel zin voor wegen in aanleg. In plaats daarvan past construction=cycleway om aan te geven wat hier in aanleg is beter.

Groeten,
Taya
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-15 21:30:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2749158043
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182346573

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-15 21:30:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2749158012
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182347787

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2023-06-16 08:17:51+00:00): Moin
du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht. An zwei Gebäuden sind die Hausnummern nun gelöscht und an einem eine neue Hausnummer angebracht. Soweit so gut. Leider hast du in deinem Kommentar nirgends angegeben auf Basis welcher Information du diese Änderung durchgeführt hast. So kann ich das leider schlecht beurteilen.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137390637
cmeter (2023-06-16 08:23:47+00:00): Hi, ich bin Entwickler und eine Kundin von mir ist aus der Hausnummer 46a in das Haus Nummer 50 umgezogen. Das ist aber im oberen linken Bereich des Rechtecks und nicht an der südöstlichen Ecke von Kreisstr. / Am Bahnhof.

Ich habe keine Beweise / Belege dafür :D Nur die neue Meldeadresse und ich wollte daher nun die Daten aufgrund der neuen Erkenntnisse aktualisieren, damit diese stimmen.

https://physio-ershausen.de/
silversurfer83 (2023-06-16 08:29:18+00:00): Alles Klar. Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung :)

(stelle gerade mit Grausen fest, dass noch niemand mit der App StreetComplete durch den Ort gegangen ist um alle Hausnummern zu erfassen)
cmeter (2023-06-16 08:30:45+00:00): Jep das stimmt, da ist leider niemand unterwegs. Wenn ich mal zu Besuch da bin, kann ich mal versuchen daran zu denken. Sehr verschlafene Ecke dort.
Lejun (2023-12-28 14:19:32+00:00): Le nom de la route « champ Cochot » vient d’où ?
GinaroZ (2023-07-01 16:16:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232189167 do you know what the surface of this path is?
casstr (2023-07-04 19:55:46+00:00): It changes surface type - the Queensferry Rd end is dirt, the twisty bit at Masterton Rd is asphalt. I am not sure where the transition is as I have not surveyed the whole length in person, so it will need a revisit.
dzamper (2026-03-12 21:03:44+00:00): Tu nie ma ani rumowisk ani brownfieldów :(

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Celowo_b%C5%82%C4%99dne_tagowanie_pod_renderer
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-06-29 21:48:37+00:00): Why did you create two one-way streets here? From the pictures it just looks like a two-way highway.
(Inactive) Huge_OSM_Fan (2023-06-29 22:18:29+00:00): Hello erickdeoliveiraleal,

In our ground imagery, we can see a yellow divider line acting as a physical barrier in the middle of the road, which indicates this should be a split route. Additionally, this section of the road was the only one not already divided when I touched it, so it made sense to have it be two one-ways for consistency. This yellow divider line also does not allow for traffic to cross it from what I could see, which is why I didn't connect any of the roads here for routing; with the exception of the ones where it was clearly marked otherwise, such as the secondary road in this area.
Glassman (2023-06-17 17:28:59+00:00): #TIP: use the tag type=route + route=evacuation + evacuation_route=tsunami for tagging of evacuation routes. The name of the highway should be as posted. Can you review this edit and fix as needed? Thanks - I'll send you more info on OSM in a DM
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137391607
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-18 06:09:23+00:00): Reverted by DWG for use of unauthorised sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140040680
ivanbranco (2023-06-16 06:27:01+00:00): Ciao Sdrugo,

grazie per le modifiche. Secondo me sarebbe meglio non cancellare e ri-disegnare gli edifici esistenti, perché così facendo si perde la storia dell'elemento (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history). Inoltre questi edifici erano stati importati dai dati della regione veneto, quindi presumo fossero piu' precisi.
paganella31 (2023-06-16 12:17:07+00:00): Hi and thanks for your contribution! Just a note: I see you added some elements that were already present, but with a slightly different position. For example [this](https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10878132700) and [this](https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10979724839).
Could you please merge them?
Kevin Kofler (2023-06-18 00:33:33+00:00): Das ist schon dein dritter aufeinanderfolgender Revert in ein- und derselben Angelegenheit (und zwar hast du bereits die Commits 3er verschiedener User revertet). Du wurdest in der Diskussion 3:1 überstimmt, das hast du zu akzeptieren, auch wenn du es persönlich noch so falsch findest. Wenn du hier noch einen Revert machst, sehe ich keine andere Wahl, als die DWG einzuschalten und eine Sperre zu beantragen.
Luzandro (2023-06-19 05:36:15+00:00): Wie kommst du auf 3:1? Ich zähle in der Diskussion 6 Personen, die alle widersprochen haben
CurlingMan13 (2023-11-01 12:27:23+00:00): Please use more detailed changeset comments.  What did you change, and why?
MissMarcoPolo (2023-06-15 23:52:01+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar Premium Imagery; Mapillary