piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_11609320 (2024-05-29 12:25:44+00:00): i will finish adjusting boundary later. there is island pockets along route 303 that I haven't adjusted
user_11609320 (2024-05-29 12:27:05+00:00): i still have to adjust the boundary on the corner of remus and myrtle ave south to ocotillo road
mappinglander (2024-05-29 14:28:48+00:00): hocam selamünaleyküm yaptığınız düzenlemeleri gördüm isminizi sildim allah korusun başınıza bir şey gelir, yaptığınız her şey internette gözüküyor yapmayın böyle şeyler millet evinizi bilmesin :) bi de at giremez falan demişsiniz onlar ne alaka tam anlamadım ama sizin işaretlediğiniz yerler sokak sanırım, ona göre biraz düzenledim. bi de rica etsem yaylaların falan isimlerini ekledim ona bi bakar mısınız. eksikse sokaklarıyla falan eklerseniz harika olur. çok sağolun valla
user_11609320 (2024-05-29 12:38:33+00:00): im pretty sure I got the current boundary for the city of glendale
GHFYOW0YDM (2024-06-05 15:52:14+00:00): Alles  falsch interpretiert!
NeisBot (2024-05-29 13:54:35+00:00): Hello MARINIsgiardino,
Welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are the relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/11942144569

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-30 07:25:28+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152019088
ika-chan! (2024-05-30 04:37:44+00:00): Classification was changed without consulting the community.
flohoff (2024-09-23 13:35:57+00:00): Hi,
there is no "access=private" on this part of the road.

It says "Privatweg" which is "Private ownership" and it says "Walk and drive on own risk" - So there is no reasoning for access=private. 

I am going to remove this.
flohoff (2024-09-23 13:37:29+00:00): And there is a life_gate which is closed and marked as "access=private" so there is no possibility of "thru" traffic anyway. 

And the whole area is densely photografed with Mapillary. You may want to check again.
Access Claims (komoot) (2026-06-02 15:57:14+00:00): Hello,

Apologies for the delayed response. Our team has changed since the original edits were made.

Thank you for taking the time to review and revert the changes.
NeisBot (2024-05-30 07:23:06+00:00): Hi vika maharani 97, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
NeisBot (2024-06-01 06:51:07+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152107366
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-01 06:51:15+00:00): Please don't add fictional map elements. Thank you!
mavl (2024-06-17 13:20:39+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, у вас есть разрешение от компаний 2ГИС, Яндекс и Гугл на использование их данных в целях улучшения OpenStreetMap?
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-06-12 18:10:16+00:00): Hi, those are not natural and man-made. Names are not meant for description. 

I propose you delete those. Bunker can probably be mapped as an underground building.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-06-22 19:13:30+00:00): removed them
rskedgell (2024-05-29 13:58:35+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and many thanks for adding this public footpath.

If you're trying to improve the mapping of public rights of way in your area, you might find this resource useful:
https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/progress/bucks/-/
user_21293476 (2024-05-29 14:54:19+00:00): 你好，你编辑的大部分地方根据的卫星图皆为一年多以前的，请注意甄别，有必要请查阅其他地图网站，多谢！
une abeille (2024-05-30 03:18:25+00:00): Bienvenue à OSM, et merci d'avoir contribué! :)
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 15:42:39+00:00): Thanks for your contribution in mapping. The mapping looks nice with tag and also the clear changeset comment. Keep contributing, Cheers!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151988957
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 15:39:22+00:00): Thanks for your contribution in mapping. The mapping looks nice with tag and also the clear changeset comment. Keep contributing, Cheers!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151989019
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 15:38:37+00:00): Thanks for your contribution in mapping. The mapping looks nice with tag and also the clear changeset comment. Keep contributing, Cheers!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151989099
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-29 13:30:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1209915117

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 15:38:05+00:00): Thanks for your contribution in mapping. The mapping looks nice with tag and also the clear changeset comment. Keep contributing, Cheers!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151989445
aceman444 (2025-05-07 13:56:22+00:00): Zdravim, tie 'garden' ci 'flowerbed' by bolo treba zjednotit. A uz urcite nic z toho tu nie je 'village_green' (to je len jedna centralna plocha niekde v strede obce co domaci vedia, ktora to je. Nie kazdy nahodny kusok zelene v meste.
aceman444 (2025-05-07 15:00:26+00:00): Taktiez ste nemali odobrat area:highway=traffic_island z ostrovcekov ceste, to bolo spravne. Ze sa to zatial nevykresluje na mape, to nevadi. Vecne to bolo v poriadku, su to ostrovceky. Nesmiete manipulovat znacky len preto aby ste dostali pekne malovanky na mape. V OSM musia byt spravne vyznacene typy objektov a je potom vecou konkretnej mapy, ktore typy a ako vykresli.
wille (2024-05-30 12:56:30+00:00): testing oauth2 comment
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151989847
marekhrabe (2024-07-26 15:35:10+00:00): V tomto changesetu jste, pravděpodobně nedopatřením, zcela odstranil ulici Františka Šimáčka: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172935222/history.

V mapách dva měsíce chyběla. Znovu jsem jí zakreslil a ještě tam teď po dohledání originálu doplním zbytek původních tagů.
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2024-07-26 17:59:40+00:00): Dík za upozornění, můžu si ty tagy doplnit sám?
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2024-07-27 08:46:41+00:00): Já už vím, čím to je. Ony v menším přiblížení nejsou moc vidět příliš moc drobné obytné oblasti, tak jsem se je rozhodl trochu sloučit a místo obytné oblasti v bloku budov jsem omylem smazal ulici. Nějak mi to uniklo :D
literan (2024-05-29 18:58:21+00:00): двойные заборы получились, некрасиво (
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 15:37:33+00:00): Thanks for your contribution in mapping. The mapping looks nice with tag and also the clear changeset comment. Keep contributing, Cheers!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151990568
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 15:36:53+00:00): Thanks for your contribution in mapping. The mapping looks nice with tag and also the clear changeset comment. Keep contributing, Cheers!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151990680
yelisey90 (2024-05-29 16:37:21+00:00): Sorry, but I reverted this edit. This is a bridge over a ground-level road, not a tunnel. The highway mostly goes on an embankment, but in this spot it's a on bridge.
OgdenRiver (2024-05-30 16:27:30+00:00): Hello yelisey90, I shall defer to your edits for that segment of the Kakutsa Choloqashvili Highway. Have a great day!
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 15:50:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution in mapping. The mapping looks nice with tag and also the clear changeset comment. Keep contributing, Cheers!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151990832
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 15:36:05+00:00): Thanks for your contribution in mapping. The mapping looks nice with tag and also the clear changeset comment. Keep contributing, Cheers!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151991010
micccey (2024-07-18 08:53:12+00:00): Bist du sicher, dass bei dem Revert alles glatt gelaufen ist? Irgendwie besteht seit diesem Änderungsatz der RFC 3 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15585602) nur noch aus einem kurzen Teilstück bei Nienburg/Weser ... oder gab es das Problem schon vorher?
Nearby0051 (2024-07-29 09:34:29+00:00): Laut Reverter Website lief alles problemlos durch. Kann mir aber gut vorstellen, dass die Relation vorher schon nicht in Ordnung war - gibts ja häufig bei Relationen :)
Aleks-Berlin (2024-06-04 16:03:17+00:00): Hi ,
please review your last tags edit in www.openstreetmap.org/way/181985844
Thanks, Alex
KiloThree (2024-05-31 06:51:44+00:00): The information you added as the description tag can be better covered by the closed tag you already added, and by the name of the school. There's not really a need for the redundancy, and redundency is specifically contraindicated for the description key: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151991583
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 15:35:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution in mapping. The mapping looks nice with tag and also the clear changeset comment. Keep contributing, Cheers!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151991794
aceman444 (2024-10-06 21:02:31+00:00): Obec sa naozaj nazyva Vysoke Tatry, nie Vysne Hagy (to je len cast a je to v addr:place), prosim nemente to v adresach budov.
Preco su potrebne tie nazvy budov ako Kotolna ci Dielna? A nevsimli ste si, ze tieto popisy uz su v znacke 'descprition' ?
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 15:34:46+00:00): Thanks for your contribution in mapping. The mapping looks nice with tag and also the clear changeset comment. Keep contributing, Cheers!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151992558
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 15:34:11+00:00): Thanks for your contribution in mapping. The mapping looks nice with tag and also the clear changeset comment. Keep contributing, Cheers!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151992601
bxl-forever (2024-05-29 16:10:15+00:00): Hello,

Could you please review this road again.

name:fr must be a translation of the text stored as name.

In the current version of the object it looks like this: 

name=Quartier Saint-Nicolas
name:fr=Rue de l'Église
name:lb=Um Fockeknapp

Perhaps change the main name tag accordingly to match its translation, or change name:fr into Quartier Saint-Nicolas.  On or the other, I don’t have the local knowledge to know, but the data inconsistency must be solved anyway.

Thanks.
white7 (2024-05-29 20:21:13+00:00): Hello,
I agree that Rue de l'Église is not the French translation of Quartier Saint-Nicolas. My intent was to correct the tag name:nl=Rue de l'Église which was even less correct because Rue de l'Église is absolutely not Dutch. I also don't have local knowledge, but I guess that Rue de l'Église is an alternative name for the part of Quartier Saint-Nicolas which leads to the church. So a more correct tag could be alt_name.
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 15:33:36+00:00): Thanks for your contribution in mapping. The mapping looks nice with tag and also the clear changeset comment. Keep contributing, Cheers!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151992797
Jakka (2024-05-29 18:39:50+00:00): https://geoportail.wallonie.be/walonmap#SHARE=199D0ECB552936A8E0630AB6A49D7047
wile_e (2024-05-29 20:55:59+00:00): J'irai vérifier sur place dans le courant du mois de juin ce qu'il en est de la numérotation exacte des numéros pairs ainsi que du 5 et du 7.
wile_e (2024-08-17 21:54:42+00:00): Je suis allé sur place. Cette maison porte le numéro 4.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-29 15:06:34+00:00): I'm not sure if this is really a beach, according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dbeach
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-29 20:41:52+00:00): I can see beaches here, but I don't understand why you have added a beach so much larger than it needs to be. Please keep your edits accurate.
aceman444 (2026-06-08 15:53:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11942370737 Ak tu je len neoficialne vyslapany chodnicek cez les, tak potom su ziadne zeleznicne priecestie nie je, naopak, je podla zakona zakazane tu prechadzat cez zeleznicu (na nevyznacenom mieste). To, ze to domaci robia je ich vec. Samozrejme chodnik, v mape moze byt (kedze fyzicky existuje), ale povolenie prechodu musi byt vyznacene, ze zakaz, crossing=no, ci access=no.
canfe (2024-06-02 15:54:01+00:00): Hai messo un natural	grassland ma è un bosco.
Ho corretto
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151993329
NeisBot (2024-05-29 14:57:24+00:00): Hi Brandonf6, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1287717798

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-30 07:26:17+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151995544
NeisBot (2024-05-29 15:00:25+00:00): Hi Brandonf6, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1287717995

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-30 07:26:38+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151995544
miluethi (2024-06-01 01:06:15+00:00): Rebecca,

Your building shapes are far too big. I'm sorry, but I had to delete most of your additions in the area.

Please match exactly the satellite imagery. Also, whenever possible, square out your buildings by pressing the "Q" key in the iD editor.

Thanks.
eggie (2024-05-29 15:37:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  De landuse=residential is al aanwezig over het hele gebied. Dus niet een landuse in een landuse maken.
Wanneer het gebouw een naam heeft kan deze op het gebouw.
Wat bedoel je met name =Domein Kalkhoven?
Het is niet de bedoeling dat persoonlijke informatie aan OSM wordt toegevoegd.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-05-29 15:42:27+00:00): De persoonlijke info en de landuse residential heb ik weer verwijderd.
Wat is je bedoeling precies. Dan kunnen we helpen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-29 15:46:18+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151993905
eggie (2024-05-30 13:37:31+00:00): Dag T4om

Je vraagt feedback 
Ziet er ingewikkeld uit. Is het gebouw niet wat kleiner? 
De mp lijkt me niet kloppen. Waarom die area=yes
..toiletten staan 2x getagd. vlak en node.

Een gebouw heeft geen inner mp nodig. Er hoeft hier denk ik helemaal geen mp relatie gebruikt te worden.
Foutmelding geeft aan... type multipolygoon op een weg?
Maar goed.. De rendering doet het wel. 
MVG
eggie
T4om (2024-05-30 15:32:21+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Dat klopt, erg bedankt voor je feedback.

ik ga er mee aan de slag.

het toiletgebouw, nu je het zecht. lijkt idd ingetekend op de stoep die er omheen licht en niet op het dak. ik weet niet meer of ik dat gedaan had of het al zo stond. oeps.

de multipolygoon:
ben nog druk aan het leeren hier over.
area=yes, vermoedelijk door mijn uitprobeer pogingen in de lijst komen staan was niet bewust.
kan er idd uit, zal ik doen.

toilet 2 keer klopt ik kwam daar niet helemaal uit.
had eerst geprobeerd het gebouw als wasgelegenheid aan te geven maar toilet en douche en wastafel zijn geen mogelijkheden of willen niet samen.

ook vond ik het op een later moment er mooier uit zien als punt, zo dat de ingang van de faciliteiten duidelijk was.

zou het beter zijn om het gebouw als gebouw aan te duiden en de faciliteiten als los punt (node)?

MP overlappen of niet overlappen.
begrijp ik dat een gebouw wel over het (nu grasveld) vlak heen mag worden getekend. ik had dit vlak opnieuw ingetekend om de bosstrooken niet over het grasveld heen te hebben liggen. al lijkt het systeem daar geen probleem me te hebben.

type multipolygoon op weg?
ik zag die foutmelding eerst ook maar dat kwam omdat het vlak verkeerd was benoemd. toen ik dat aanpaste ging de foutmelding weg. is die toch teruggekomen. ik begrijp dan nog niet waar dat aan licht.

in iedergeval erg bedankt voor je tijd en kennis.

groet 

tom
eggie (2024-05-30 15:38:23+00:00): Dat lege vlak kun je zo laten en die als inner gebruiken. Daar ligt geen gras.
Het gebouw gewoon losmaken en wat kleiner maken.
Dan krijg je een gebouw met een wit randje tussen gebouw en gras.
Toilet tag. Up to you.. een keuze.
Die foutmelding zal wellicht door dat area komen.
Dat lege vak hoeft geen tag.
Mapse..
eggie
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 15:42:02+00:00): Thanks for your contribution in mapping. The mapping looks nice with tag and also the clear changeset comment. Keep contributing, Cheers!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151995116
ManuelB701 (2024-05-30 11:43:42+00:00): Kleine Frage: War es wirklich nötig, hier cycleway=opposite hinzuzufügen, wenn es schon längst durch oneway:bicycle=no geregelt wird? Die Idee ist, dass cycleway=opposite u.ä. langsam abgeschafft werden und schon heute werden diese durch oneway:bicycle=no ersetzt.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Deprecate_cycleway%3Dopposite_family
felipeeugenio (2025-08-15 02:17:21+00:00): Hola. Buenas noches. Pasé por Puerto Montt y estaba revisando varias cosas. Muy buena pega la que has hecho en la ciudad, sobre todo con las veredas.
Eso si le pasé estas ediciones a otros maperos para que las miraran. Es un uso del scrub y de wood que no corresponde para nada. Es casi que un mapeo para que se vea lindo. Pasa encima de casas que están mapeadas agrupando varias construcciones además. Llevo un buen rato tratando de arreglar lo que puedo, pero la mayoría hay que borrarlo... porfa si puedes métete al chat de la comunidad en Telegram por si quieres ocnversar con más ejemplos.


Para estas manzanas, si ves árboles usar natural=tree o schrub.

a lo más scrub en un sitio vacío, pero hay bosques completos en casas que no tienen ningún árbol.

Saludos y feliz si quieres conversar con el resto de los maperos en el chat.

saludos
Akrimullah (2024-05-31 10:44:23+00:00): Nice POIs addition bud. Keep your good work!
opendcc (2024-05-29 16:18:51+00:00): Hallo,
nochmal: bitte benutze Bayern80 als Hintergrund. Die Gebäude sind sonst nicht an der richtigen Stelle.

Servus
felipeeugenio (2024-05-29 16:28:59+00:00): Hola Luis
Estás en el chat de la comunidad? Eres el segundo mapero en 24 horas que se mete a cambiar varias cosas en esa Ruta.
Queríamos saber qué es lo que realmente está entregado y con qué estándar, porque las clasificaciones de motorway trunk son bastante delicadas.
Ojalá puedas unirte al chat, ya que entiendo eres de la zona. El link es el https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151995986 (tienes que bajar Telegram. una app muy similar a whatsapp)

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151995986
luisicg (2024-05-30 17:42:24+00:00): Hola Felipe, viaje el 28 de mayo en la ruta ida vuelta (el tramo estaba abierto en ambos sentidos) y según revise en la página de la concesión, el tramo estaría abierto desde el 26/05 y según portales de noticias el 29 de mayo, estaba entregado al MOP el tramo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151995986
luisicg (2024-05-30 17:44:22+00:00): Y claro, me podrías enviar el enlace al telegram estaría muy agradecido.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151995986
felipeeugenio (2024-05-30 17:50:43+00:00): HOla. Perdón, iba a copiar el link y copié cualquier cosa.

el link es el https://t.me/OSMcl

saludos
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-30 11:21:46+00:00): Você tem alguma evidência de que este lago existe?
Do you have any evidence that this lake exists?
gotchhhhh (2024-05-30 16:25:17+00:00): eu moro aqui, o laguinho da bica existe há mais de 50 anos, tanto que quando falta água na torneira a comunidade pega água na bica
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-30 20:53:24+00:00): Se não for uma característica natural ou seminatural, e as pessoas usam para obter água, talvez marcá-la como um poço ou reservatório seria mais preciso?
Patchanka (2024-05-29 16:05:16+00:00): erreur dans la source.
Source : PCRS raster ouvert; survey
JeroenHoek (2024-05-29 16:49:38+00:00): Tip: voeg aan parkeerhavens parking=street_side toe.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side

parking=surface is voor een heel parkeerterrein.
hamedolympia (2024-05-29 16:20:31+00:00): تولیدی پوشاک تمنا
Akrimullah (2024-05-31 09:07:08+00:00): Hi, it's really a great effort to add such detailed POIs to your area!
Akrimullah (2024-05-31 09:04:18+00:00): Hi, it's really a great effort to add such detailed POIs to your area!
Akrimullah (2024-05-31 09:02:19+00:00): Hi, it's really a great effort to add such detailed POIs to your area!
Akrimullah (2024-05-31 09:01:13+00:00): Hi, it's really a great effort to add such detailed POIs to your area!
Akrimullah (2024-05-31 09:00:10+00:00): Hi, it's really a great effort to add such detailed POIs to your area!
Akrimullah (2024-05-31 08:59:38+00:00): Hi, it's really a great effort to add such detailed POIs to your area!
Akrimullah (2024-05-31 08:57:27+00:00): Hi, it's really a great effort to add such detailed POIs to your area!
Akrimullah (2024-05-31 08:56:11+00:00): Hi, it's really a great effort to add such detailed POIs to your area!
Langlaeufer (2024-05-30 08:33:38+00:00): Das must du nicht explizit machen das steckt bereits in motorroad=yes
Akrimullah (2024-05-31 08:55:06+00:00): Hi, it's really a great effort to add such detailed POIs to your area!
Akrimullah (2024-05-31 08:54:31+00:00): Hi, it's really a great effort to add such detailed POIs to your area!
Akrimullah (2024-05-30 13:11:10+00:00): Keep up your good work. Any specific POIs added to OSM by your edit will be useful for OSM data users.
Akrimullah (2024-05-30 13:10:23+00:00): Keep up your good work. Any specific POIs added to OSM by your edit will be useful for OSM data users.