piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Xvtn (2024-03-22 15:03:23+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. From what I can tell, there are no problems! There are indeed lots of relations involved, though, so perhaps a more experienced mapper can chime in.
Thanks for your contributions! (And nice job on this edit. I've briefly tried Vespucci, I feel like an edit like this one is quite the feat on a smartphone! Haha.)
Xvtn (2024-03-19 14:39:44+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks good to me - no complaints! Thanks for your contributions!
Kovoschiz (2024-03-19 05:33:20+00:00): "Except for permit" shouldn't use `=permit` in HK. That's ambiguous, and was defined for "routinely granted" ones in other country.
Kovoschiz (2024-03-19 05:33:53+00:00): 2. Also be careful about `access=` vs `motor_vehicle=`
Xvtn (2024-03-19 14:38:42+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great to me - Thanks for your contribution!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-22 18:29:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1263969650 - in case it is unpaved adding description into name is not needed at all

it is enough to put proper surface info, maybe put it into description
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-23 19:14:39+00:00): note that descriptions may be put into description tags, but not names

are you sure that it is actually a name?

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1263651466/history
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-06-17 16:23:21+00:00): I removed this "name"

See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments.php?uid=20934066 for more not answered questions
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-25 11:15:09+00:00): Please stop gluing landuse to roads. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential#Separation_from_roads
tastrax (2024-03-23 03:58:24+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
cart0 (2024-03-19 16:06:54+00:00): Hi obyrnegps

Why are carparks/parking lots (parking=surface)  being added to houses here and other locations around Dublin?

service=driveway already assumes that parking is possible.
obyrnegps (2024-03-20 17:52:07+00:00): Some dwellings only have a driveway where vehicles can park, while others have paved in the entire front garden to provide significant additional off-street parking.  Could be a reflection of adult children gainfully employed owning vehicles and still living with older generation longer than previously or the provision of additional off-street parking for  short-term letting or for rent
cart0 (2024-04-04 21:14:34+00:00): They would still be driveways more so than parking lots.   Regardless of family dynamics..

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway

"Primarily provides direct access to a house, garage, or carport; **a small number of parking spots may be available for occupants**."
SomeoneElse (2024-05-19 10:54:52+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16066 .
obyrnegps (2024-05-20 11:52:53+00:00): While checking for infill housing, garages and sheds, I am finding streets where only one driveway is plotted for a whole street or estate.  Previously I deleted the solitary driveways I found on a street as I could see no reason why only one driveway had been plotted where many others existed, or why that particular single driveway was mapped.  I was accused of vandalising the map for this.  I therefore decided where I found only a single driveway plotted to plot all the rest on the street in the same way that the original single driveway was picked out to be plotted.  If the original single driveway connected to the footpath only, I followed that initial established pattern for all driveways.  If I found the original single driveway connected to both the road and footpath, I follow that pattern for the whole street.  Where no driveway on a street had been plotted by anyone else, I do not start, adding any driveways, leaving those streets without driveways.
The paving in of an entire private amenity front garden for parking or any other use requires planning permission.  This is because it has significant implications.  The widening of a driveway entrance to access additional parking also requires planning permission. The paving in of a grass margin on the public footpath to access additional parking requires a licence from the Local Authority.  The removal of a street tree to access additional parking also requires a licence from the Local Authority.  It also brings about the elimination of public on-street parking space(s) in favour of private only parking.  In some instances such private parking is then made available for rent where the Local Authority has imposed on-street parking restrictions or charges.  It is difficult to establish however where commercial arrangements apply.  I only plot such private parking where the entirety of the front garden has been paved over.
It seems compliance with a rigid orthodoxy established by persons unknown to me is required for contributing to OSM.  No departure from this orthodoxy is to be tolerated and anyone who does is to be blocked and or silenced.  I have regularly checked the OSM Inspector issues flagged by Pascal Neis’s OSM Quality assurance system for my contributions to OSM.  I have a very low level of OSMI or Osmouse issues flagged against my contributions compared to others.  Despite this none of the points I have made in the previous discussions I have engaged with have been given any consideration, instead I’ve received total dismissal of my points (in particular regarding (i) “dismount” for cyclists on a public footpath, and (ii)private additional parking in residential areas that can simultaneously reduce public parking availability and more than double private parking in residential areas.   I therefore see no point in contributing further to OSM
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-26 18:49:40+00:00): Why you think https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220623448/ is highway=trunk?
rskedgell (2024-03-19 08:33:57+00:00): If the gate is still there and normally closed/locked, bicycle=yes (and the foot=yes which was already present) would be incorrect as there are separately mapped cycle bypasses.

The traffic order for the closure here is at https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/L-56291-482
007Transformer (2024-03-19 14:45:44+00:00): I have reviewed the issue and your response and agree that your response is ok to send.  Thank you
007Transformer (2024-03-19 15:36:19+00:00): Hi
rskedgell,
My sincere apologies for typo mistake above. please read as below:

Thank you very much for your valuable feedback, related to source materials use. I will revert my edits from the database, and I will be more cautious with my future edits.
MxxCon (2024-03-20 17:10:28+00:00): What is the current name?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148843520
Robin Zyx (2024-03-20 17:17:59+00:00): See the discussion for note #163784.
Robin Zyx (2024-03-20 19:21:35+00:00): Which is to say, I know what was there a couple years ago but not right now. If I'd know this spot was flagged I would have checked last weekend when I passed by only 100 yards away. Next time...
iriman (2024-03-23 23:48:50+00:00): سلام در مورد «کادویی و لوازم خانگی فانوس» قوری و کتری و پارچ و ظروف کوچک آشپزخانه می‌فروشه و بنا به توضیحات ویکی به نظرم برچسب 
houseware
مناسب‌تر باشه از
appliance
که برای یخچال و ماشین لباس‌شویی و از این قبیل توصیه شده
Osm1980 (2024-03-24 15:31:54+00:00): سلام درست میفرمایید.
iriman (2024-03-24 20:58:18+00:00): به خاطر تشابهی که در نام فروشگاه‌های «لوازم خانگی خرد» و «لوازم خانگی بزرگ» ممکنه وجود داشته باشه؛ مثل این مورد یا فروشگاه آوا
node/7854978428
میخواستم این دو مورد که اطلاع دارم و همچنین سایر مواردی رو که برچسب‌های 
houseware
رو به
appliance
تغییر دادین، مجدداً به 
houseware
تغییر بدم. به نظر شما موردی نداره؟
Osm1980 (2024-03-25 10:29:14+00:00): موارد رو که اطلاع دارید و میدونید به houseware نزدیکتره رو تغییربدهید
Gemini64 (2024-03-19 06:02:06+00:00): редактирование новых адресов по ул.Есенберлина
citrula (2024-03-21 19:21:56+00:00): Please don't add abandoned roads where there is no on-the-ground presence. This part of Tower Dr. is entirely built over.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148844515
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-22 18:28:41+00:00): Are there any traces at all of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1263176548 at the ground?
Negreheb (2024-03-19 07:55:32+00:00): Servus Stefan_89, du bist da gerade recht fleissig im Notizen schließen, da muss man auch ein bisschen mehr schauen. Hier zum Beispiel, das teil heisst nicht "Stocksportanlage", das ist eine Stocksportanlage. Dazu am besten mal im wiki danach suchen, da kommt man auf diese Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:sport%3Dice_stock - am besten eintragen `leisure=ice_rink` mit einem `sport=ice_stock` und wenn du wisst, wer das ganze betreibt, kann man den Betrieber (DSV?) noch als `operator=*` eintragen. 

Alles gute :)
Stefan_89 (2024-03-19 08:07:33+00:00): Hallo,
Danke für die Info/ Den Fehlerhinweis.

Normalerweise suche ich inzwischen immer ob es etwas im Wiki gibt - in diesem Fall fand ich irgendwie Eisstock nicht 100% passend für eine Asphaltstock-Anlage. Aber es stimmt, das ist vermutlich an allen Möglichkeiten am nächsten dran.
Negreheb (2024-03-19 08:37:50+00:00): Ahja, manchmal verstecken sich einige Sachen recht gut im Wiki :D 

Ich nehme an, im Winter wird das dann auch für Eis verwendet, dann geht das meiner Meinung nach :)
11daf (2024-05-31 08:44:46+00:00): Добрый день!

Этой правкой наглухо перектыто движение по половине дорог в районе.

Подскажите, пожалуйста, каким образом перекрыты эти дороги в реальности? Знаки "кирпич" стоят, ведутся строительные работы, блокпосты?

Что с автобусами? Отменены или идут в объезд?
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-19 07:11:52+00:00): Do not partially overlap landcovers (fairway and putting green) for example.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148845065
literan (2024-03-19 18:22:15+00:00): ознакомьтесь, пожалуйста, с правилами адресации домов в РФ: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2

прошу  исправить свою ошибку
dreua (2024-03-20 01:26:30+00:00): Wird hier physio unter freiem Himmel im Hof gemacht? Wenn möglich bitte den Punkt möglichst genau dort platzieren wo die Sache ist (ich würde annehmen, dass das im Gebäude wäre). Danke :)
Sebastian | Yanosik (2024-03-27 09:56:13+00:00): Cześć!
Tag opening_date jest powiązany z construction. Jeśli przy zakończeniu remontu usuwasz construction, bardzo proszę usuwaj też opening_date ;)
Pozdrawiam!
tschoerbi (2024-04-06 08:49:24+00:00): Please don't map "house numbers" with periods in them. These are some sort of federal building number, as I understand, but certainly not part of an actual address.

Happy mapping,

Peter
gendy54 (2024-03-31 19:45:40+00:00): Bonjour,

Dans quel cadre faites-vous de recensement ?
Si c'est dans le cadre professionnel/rémunéré, il serait utile de le préciser dans votre profil.

Merci ;)
tekim (2024-03-26 00:30:10+00:00): Hello, Thanks for the edits. Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Maps when editing OpenStreetMap due to Google's terms of use.
Talkless (2024-03-26 19:25:54+00:00): Hi, I believe I've used Street View to fix it's location better, as it's not yet available in ortophoto.
tekim (2024-03-26 19:35:41+00:00): Hello again, Thanks for the message. 
Regardless of whether it is the only source, or it is a better source, using Google Street View is not allowed.
Talkless (2024-03-26 20:07:10+00:00): Thanks for explanation.

What about contacts like phone numbers and work hours listed in Facebook or Google pages?
tekim (2024-03-28 17:39:38+00:00): Hello again.  Sorry for the delay.  I am not a lawyer, but my understanding is that using those sources for phone numbers should be ok.
pesec (2024-03-19 08:15:45+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Спасибо за участие в проекте.
Не забывайте пожалуйста при редактировании возвращать строениям тэг building
Чаще пользуйтесь справкой.
pza (2024-04-05 20:02:24+00:00): This changeset deleted the footpath from Bridge Rd to Wentworth Park Light rail station.  Fixed in 149562897.
b0ssi (2024-04-07 02:26:14+00:00): Good catch, this was indeed an accidental deletion.

What's a good way to track down past changes, especially discovering an object that has by now been deleted (and from there the changeset)? I can't find a way to do and visualize time- and/or changeset-diffs (JOSM).
pza (2024-04-07 02:50:07+00:00): When I need to go fishing for deleted items or back in time for some other reason, I use https://overpass-turbo.eu/.
b0ssi (2024-04-07 02:59:07+00:00): Right, I had just figured that out in JOSM (OverPass API query panel) to get data at given timestamps. That seems to be a fairly reasonable way to do diffs and narrow-down results to find culprits! Thanks.
Usimonm (2024-03-19 07:59:23+00:00): Scheint, als wäre mir ein Fehler passiert. Wie kann ich das Löschen rückgängig machen?
VMPanes (2024-03-20 09:41:03+00:00): Thanks for adding details here in Dagupan. 

If you want join the local Philippine community you can join https://t.me/OSMph at Telegram or the local Facebook community at https://facebook.com/OSMPH. For other questions you can DM me locally here in Openstreetmap.

Thanks and keep on mapping!
julcnx (2024-04-22 14:53:49+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM! I've had to revert your changes as they don't align with Thailand's highway guidelines. As a new mapper, it's a great idea to begin with straightforward edits in areas you're familiar with, such as your local neighborhood. Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions. Thank you! - Julien

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150351228
adas (2024-03-19 13:48:20+00:00): Hej,
Sprawdzisz czy puszcza jest prawidłowo teraz zaznaczona? Bo pojawiają mi się białe połacie terenu zamiast lasu przy odświeżaniu. Chyba, ze musi chwilę potrwać aż się to odświeży prawidłowo.
grzegorz75jan (2024-03-19 21:35:39+00:00): Dziwnie się to zachowuje i to po trzynastu godzinach od edycji.
kakiremora (2024-03-20 00:07:14+00:00): Czy nie lepszym rozwiązaniem byłoby zostawienie lasu na małych obszarach i w relacji dać nazwę albo podobnie?
grzegorz75jan (2024-03-20 00:19:47+00:00): Fakt bo nazwa Puszcza Bydgoska pojawia się wielokrotnie. Dodatkowo przynajmniej niektóre relacje (role) wydają się tam nietypowe, może nawet zbędne.
Anas masuris (2024-03-20 09:07:40+00:00): Nie mam pojęcia, dlaczego tak się wydarzyło. Chyba trzeba to cofnąć - ale to dziwne, gdyż samo poszerzanie relacji o człony nie powinno tak się renderować
grzegorz75jan (2024-03-20 09:20:12+00:00): Nie wiem czy to ma aż taki wpływ na całość ale na szybko widziałem jedną z relacji jako niepełną przy zaznaczeniu. Dodatkowo ta wielość relacji ma role outer. Dodatkowo czy tam jest potrzebna tak duża ilość relacji. Pisałem wcześniej, że niepotrzebnie na jednej puszczy en razy powtarza się nazwa Puszcza Bydgoska. To mogło być źle zrobione już wcześniej a teraz przypadkiem ktoś wyłapał jakiś błąd. Podobno iD nie ułatwia z relacjami. Moje umiejętności są tu za małe.
SpinOff (2024-03-20 21:06:46+00:00): @Anas Wejdź na Discorda w czat #weryfikacja-zmian
grzegorz75jan (2024-03-20 21:14:05+00:00): Na Discordzie wzmianki o tym są od wczoraj na różnych kanałach. Dzisiaj zgłosiłem by ktoś władny na to popatrzył ponieważ w tym obszarze działał później jeszcze ktoś inny https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148862048#map=14/52.9909/18.4605&layers=N i jak przedtem puszcza migała tak teraz znikła. Zgłoszone bo staje się to co raz bardziej zagmatwane i ciężko komuś będzie się w tym połapać i sensownie wycofać.
eggie (2024-03-19 11:22:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback   Iets is alleen maar een woonerf als er een bord woonerf is geplaatst. Is dat het geval?
Is het niet gewoon een highway=service service=driveway?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148848223


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-03-19 18:06:58+00:00): Wegklasse aangepast naar highway=service..
Mocht er een officieel bord woonerf G5 staan laat het even weten.
MVG
eggie
Hinkzk (2024-03-20 06:31:52+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

Dat bord staat er denk ik niet dus de aanpassing zal correct zijn.

Vriendelijke groet,
Hink
eggie (2024-03-20 06:48:49+00:00): Dag Hink..
Bedankt voor je reactie
Mvg
eggie
mavl (2024-03-24 14:55:16+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, у вас есть разрешение от компании Яндекс на использование её данных для улучшения OpenStreetMap?
mustafin_sm (2024-03-24 15:34:58+00:00): Добрый вечер, вы имеете ввиду, есть ли у меня разрешение на использование данных находящихся в открытом доступе?
mavl (2024-03-25 02:42:23+00:00): Да. Данных, находящихся в открытом доступе и защищённых авторским правом, которые компания-правообладатель запрещает использовать для копирования в другие сервисы.
mustafin_sm (2024-03-25 03:23:16+00:00): Я понял. Больше не стану упоминать эту кампанию в своих правках.
mavl (2024-03-25 14:45:52+00:00): Спасибо за ответ. Получается, что разрешения нет. В таком случае OSM не может публиковать эту информацию по юридическим причинам. Этот пакет правок отменён.  
  
Если будет явное разрешения от Яндекса, то его данные можно будет добавлять. Без разрешения нельзя добавлять данные любых компаний. OSM публикует только свободные данные.  
  
Если данные Яндекса будут добавлены, но не будет упоминаться их источник, то такие данные будут удалены.
mustafin_sm (2024-03-25 15:01:13+00:00): Я Вас понял
Branko Kokanovic (2024-03-22 20:18:45+00:00): zasto si na way-u https://openstreetmap.org/way/711798866 izbrisala "name" i "name:sr" tagove, a ostavila "name:sr-Latn" i ref:RS:ulica, nema mi mnogo smisla?
Pan (2024-03-19 08:35:04+00:00): source: Swiss Image 2024 + GWR from http://qa.poole.ch/addresses/GWR/5404_all.geojson.zip
Frans S (2024-03-21 13:08:15+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped on this changeset.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148849016
Frans S (2024-03-21 13:08:16+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped on this changeset.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148849016
4004 (2024-03-23 23:35:46+00:00): але Ці патрэбны гэты "нейм"?
4004 (2024-12-28 20:13:06+00:00): перетегировал в мемориал=ценотаф, раз уж это он
dentonny (2025-01-19 21:37:34+00:00): Hey,
Vandaag langs gefietst: borden privé staan er nog steeds.
GR-menneke (2025-01-19 23:07:20+00:00): Dag dentonny,
Mag ik je vragen dit te melden via het meldingsformulier op de website van de stad Geel of via grondgebiedszaken@geel.be a.u.b.?
Thx
GR-menneke
dentonny (2025-01-20 06:40:07+00:00): done :)
dentonny (2025-07-27 14:55:20+00:00): juli '25: bord staat er nog steeds
user_12500175 (2024-10-27 11:31:19+00:00): Hallo,
super dass du bei OSM mitmachst und hilfst die Datenbank zu verbessern.

Ich habe gesehen dass du in Stadtbergen/Deuringen Hydranten eingetragen hast. Das ist super, allerding gibt es beim Tagging von Hydranten den Konsens keine postalischen Adressen mit einzutragen. Siehe hier die Beiträge im Forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/hydrant-adresse-bei-position-eingetragen/118634

Adressen an Hydranten kann man mit dem Tag “Objekt”
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:object:*

oder (nicht so beliebt) mit
fire_hydrant:housenumber=*
fire_hydrant:street=*

eintragen.

Hier noch das WIKI zu Hydranten https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant

Bei Fragen einfach hier melden oder im deutschen Forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56
Viel Spass beim Mappen 
Gruß Danfost
mavl (2024-03-19 13:10:57+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, зачем вы удаляете объекты и на их место добавляете такие же?
Filip009CZ (2025-07-07 18:43:34+00:00): Zdravím, máte aj fotku dopravnej značky? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1563423376. Z tejto to neviem vyčítať https://backend.freemap.sk/gallery/pictures/241069/image?width=1388
moonraver (2025-07-08 07:10:21+00:00): zdravim,dal som ju prec,zavora tam uplne postacuje
Mirecnet (2024-09-10 09:35:12+00:00): Ahoj,
preco menis polovnicku chatu na Cervenych pieskoch bez konzultacie,  prieskumu a zamerania na tourism ???
Vsak to je cista lovecka chata!

Ja som rad, ze po mne opravujes chyby. No skus sa niekedy aspon opytat, nech sa vzajomne neprepisujeme. Dik
mapperue (2024-09-10 09:51:56+00:00): Lovecké chaty sa značia ako tourism=hunting_lodge, pretože to nie je horáreň. Pozri si diskusiu tu:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/lovske-koce-oznacevanje/99049/5
Mirecnet (2024-03-19 14:21:58+00:00): Preco premenovavas polovnicke jagerky na tourism=hunting_lodge

Tam nie je ziadna turistika. Len divocina a polovny revir...
mapperue (2024-03-19 14:37:45+00:00): Ahoj,
bola okolo toho debata na fóre a značka tourism=hunting_lodge sa na takéto objekty používa.
MarcoR (2024-03-21 13:36:41+00:00): Ciao e benvenuti su OpenStreetMap!

Nel caso di strada privata, il tag più adatto potrebbe essere access=private (vedi la wiki per maggiori info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access)

Buon mapping,
Marco
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148850218
elsy1 (2024-04-08 17:54:39+00:00): درود، توضیح نوشتید اضافه کردن بزرگراه میشه بفرمایید کدام یک از این خیابان ها بزرگراه هستند که شما تگ آن ها رو ترانک قرار دادید؟
Ziemowit Zabawa (2024-03-22 23:00:10+00:00): Niestety musiałem wycofać ten zestaw zmian. Znaki D-7/8 stoją tam, gdzie zawsze, czyli tuż przed węzłem Opacz. Jest też rozbieżność słupków pikietażowych w terenie i na stronie GDDKiA, a w takich przypadkach pierwszeństwo ma stan faktyczny. Jeśli chcesz, to możesz pomóc i złożyć zapytanie o GDDKiA o wyjaśnienie tej nieścisłości, bo jest to ewidentnie do poprawienia.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149033537