piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Yog Sot (2025-06-28 19:11:57+00:00): bo właśnie tak jest, że można sobie tam chodzić i faktycznie jeździć po całej powierzchni, a area wyznacza granice betonu. Ja nie wiem, może ktoś w między czasie zmienił zasadę stosowania placów, potem się upewnie, ale sa nawigacje, które właśnie to wykorzystują by nawigować faktycznie po placu, a nie arbitralnych ściezkach, które wyrysowujemy. Nie kasuj funkcjonalności, która jest. Masz taki staż, że chyba wiesz, że sa takie nawigacje.
YomanNH (2025-06-30 17:38:55+00:00): Mój staż nie ma tu znaczenia, nie staż decyduje o prawidłowym lub błędnym mapowaniu.

W dokumentacji jasno jest napisane do czego służy highway=* + area=yes, a do czego area:highway=*. Z pewnością nie czytałeś, więc w skrócie:
- highway=* + area=yes służy do mapowania placów, po których można poruszać się w różnych kierunkach, czyli jest to duży, nieliniowy obszar,
- area:highway=* służy do oznaczania dokładnego kształtu drogi/chodnika, zazwyczaj będącego linią (chociaż niekoniecznie) i nie służy do routingu.

Dodatkowo obszar area:highway=* powinien mieć taką samą wartość, jak highway=*, czyli droga, której kształt reprezentuje.

A teraz przechodząc do tego konkretnego przypadku: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37876301 jest prawidłową linią highway=path. Możesz utworzyć obszar area:highway=path, żeby dokładnie zmapować kształt tego obiektu. Jednak utworzyłeś relację https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18943807, gdzie dodałeś błędne area=yes, jakby to był rozległy plac oraz błędne highway=pedestrian (czyli ten "plac" ma inny typ drogi, niż linia na nim narysowana - highway=path). Ale oczywiście żadne highway=* nie jest tu prawidłowe, bo to nie jest plac.

W razie wątpliwości zapraszam na Discorda. Poruszyłem tam temat tego fikcyjnego placu. Kilka osób poparło moje zdanie, nikt nie poparł tworzenia fikcyjnych placów, które swoją drogą są plagą w Poznaniu.
Yog Sot (2025-07-02 07:45:59+00:00): Jak chcesz o czymś z kimś dyskutować, warto rozmawiać właśnie z tą osobą. Natomiast ty robisz to za moimi plecami ;]
Skasowałeś geometrię, unimozliwiłes nawigację po niej oraz infomacje gdzie znajduje sie beton. 
Tak więc błąd za błędem z twojej strony.
YomanNH (2025-07-02 07:58:56+00:00): > Jak chcesz o czymś z kimś dyskutować, warto rozmawiać właśnie z tą osobą.

To właśnie się tu dzieje.


> Skasowałeś geometrię, unimozliwiłes nawigację po niej 

Możesz wyjaśnić skąd i dokąd nawigacja jest niemożliwa? Wszystkie prawidłowe linie highway=* są takie, jak były.


> infomacje gdzie znajduje sie beton

Podaj link do obiektu, na którym rzekomo usunąłem tę informację.
Yog Sot (2025-07-02 09:17:33+00:00): jak nie rozumiesz jak działają nawigacje, to najpierw się dowiedz, a potem dopiero kasuj. 
beton jest w obszarze r18943807

Dalszą dyskusje prowadz na forum, albo naumiej się oznaczać ludzi poprzez @ aby dostawali powiadomienia. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/zglaszanie-i-prosby-o-sprawdzenie-kont-edycji-uzytkownikow/110854/209
eggie (2025-06-27 06:34:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  De bakkerij staat al op de kaart.. alleen op nr 102.
To nu als disused:shop, maar kennelijk nu geopend?
Jouw info staat op een adresnode nr 100.
De vraag is nu wat is het juiste adres.
Overigens hoef je geen adressen toe te voegen. Die zijn al aanwezig.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-06-27 06:38:48+00:00): De dubbele vermelding heb ik verwijderd. Alles info staat nu op adresnode nr 100.
Mapse
eggie
Frans S (2025-06-27 12:42:13+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark, You tend to oversize the buildings you map. Stay within the rooflines. These huts have an overhang, so they show to be bigger than they are. Zoom in (IDeditor) till at least 40 ft. to have a good view to map a building.

Objects without a roof (shadow on both the in-and outside or no shadow at all) are not to be mapped as a building.

Best regards
Frans S (2025-07-01 08:33:57+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project. 
A remark.
I noticed that the buildings you map often are a bit, more or less, oversized. Please stay within the rooflines. These huts have an overhang, so they show to be bigger than they are. Zoom in (ID editor) till at least 40 ft. to have a good view to map a building.

Gregory Peony wrote an article about this 
in the Questions and comment section of this program.
About Mapping Accurate Building Size.
Check it please.

Best regards and keep mapping.
Frans S (2025-06-27 12:58:58+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
A remark, You tend to oversize the buildings you map. Stay within the rooflines. These huts have an overhang, so they show to be bigger than they are. Zoom in (IDeditor) till at least 40 ft. to have a good view to map a building
Best regards
Frans S (2025-06-27 13:12:01+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
A remark, You tend to oversize the buildings you map. Stay within the rooflines. These huts have an overhang, so they show to be bigger than they are. Zoom in (IDeditor) till at least 40 ft. to have a good view to map a building
Best regards
Frans S (2025-06-27 15:24:04+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping,
You forgot to tag the buildings you mapped. 
Building=yes should be tagged,
Best regards
Joseph R P (2025-06-28 15:20:04+00:00): It might be better to keep 5th Street primary here despite its relatively low AADT (when compared to east-wets routes—it still is the highest traffic north-south route through here), it actually is a very high-connectivity thoroughfare on the basis that it is the most direct north-south route through suburban North Las Vegas, linking the area to Downtown Las Vegas in a straight shot—plus it has connections with the Beltway in the north and I 15 via Cheyenne or Lake Mead in the south. I would wager that these are some of the reasons why the Federal Highway Administration even designated this as an NHS route.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-06-28 15:30:23+00:00): Okay. Who even comes up with these rules anyway?
Joseph R P (2025-06-28 16:48:21+00:00): In short—the community and your own personal judgement. 

The rules are really just vague guidelines that are followed by local OSM communities or individuals who try to put two-and-two together based off how everyone else does it. For US road classification specifically, these are based upon a community-built, consensus-approved documentation like this OSM Wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance

For primary roads in urban areas in particular, the guidelines would be to use this classification on the most important arterial roads—which is vague, and up to interpretation. Prior to when I started editing, a lot of the Las Vegas Valley's primary roads already followed this guideline. If I can recall correctly, the original significant primary roads in the valley were Craig, Lake Mead, Charleston, Tropicana, Boulder Highway, Las Vegas Blvd, Rainbow, Rancho, Paradise, Eastern, 5th Street, and Nellis—some of the most important arterial roads in the area at a glance. I went off how these were classified and upgraded other secondary roads, like Durango, Sahara, Cheyenne, etc. up to primary based on their similar roles and characteristics (like connectivity with major highways and regions of the valley, AADT, physical construction, road designation, HGV route) etc.

Unfortunately, a lot of highway classification cannot be determined with a source or a road number, and it will have to be up to the opinions of one, two, or many mappers. This can be avoided with a state highway classification page, but as far as I know, Nevada doesn't have one (yet). For the mean time, discussing and scrutinizing each road with other mappers one-by-one may be the best way to go about it.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-06-28 23:04:43+00:00): Alrighty, that's very informativea, and I appreciate it. But, if I recall correctly (edits to Washington Avenue, Bonanza Road, and Casino Center Boulevard), you told me that state highways don't actually tell people about the road's importance in the network. I could make a list of Nevada State Highways, but the list will (likely) only get smaller as the Nevada DOT relinquishes control of state highways. Where could I make such a page, and how (if possible, like you're implying now) could this list help with road classifications?
Joseph R P (2025-06-28 23:42:49+00:00): Sorry, I should specified which kinds of designations I speak of, like NHS (National Highway System) designations. These for example are the highways that the FHWA has deemed the most important to the country logistically, usually those that links major industrial and/or transport hubs. Sometimes, however, a highway number designation can be relevant to the road's importance, like an Interstate or U.S. Route, and even state routes in some states or in rural areas of a state like Nevada, but not always. Highway numbers can and should be taken into consideration on a case-by-case basis but in urban areas like Las Vegas than can almost always be ignored since they're more relics of the past and now only reflect who maintains the road rather than how important it is or a sign to be used for navigation.

I would say that it may not be that necessary to make a list of state highways in Nevada, as Wikipedia's list can be used if needed—but if you were to go about creating a proposal for the community, you can create a page on the OSM Wiki.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-06-29 17:28:25+00:00): Okay, thanks for informing me again!
Frans S (2025-06-27 13:01:07+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
A remark, You tend to oversize the buildings you map. Stay within the rooflines. These huts have an overhang, so they show to be bigger than they are. Zoom in (IDeditor) till at least 40 ft. to have a good view to map a building
Best regards
Firefishy (2025-06-27 13:50:50+00:00): Nice. Thank you. Any other map improvements greatly appreciated. Local knowledge is awesome.
Frans S (2025-06-27 13:20:45+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
A remark, You tend to oversize the buildings you map. Stay within the rooflines. These huts have an overhang, so they show to be bigger than they are. Zoom in (IDeditor) till at least 40 ft. to have a good view to map a building
Best regards
Frans S (2025-06-29 13:22:32+00:00): Thanks for mapping on this project. 
A remark.
I noticed that the buildings you map often are a bit, more or less, oversized. Please stay within the rooflines. These huts have an overhang, so they show to be bigger than they are. Zoom in (IDeditor) till at least 40 ft. to have a good view to map a building.
Best regards and keep mapping.
Frans S (2025-06-27 10:35:32+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping.  Buildings should be rectangular ! And not clustered.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168169193
Frans S (2025-06-28 10:50:36+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping,
You mapped trees as being buildings.
Look to the irregularity of those objects. Buildings are not green either,
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2025-06-29 12:33:51+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project. 
You regularly map round objects, but forget to tag them as building=yes.
I corrected them
Best regards and keep mapping
Vétérini (2025-07-19 08:52:47+00:00): Bonjour, l'attribut name ne correspondant pas aux bonnes pratiques OSM, je corrige
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-07-22 07:40:26+00:00): Bonjour , merci de votre alerte, et de votre correction. Cordialement
alain
user_5359 (2025-06-27 07:26:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please mark a building as building instead of landuse.
Frans S (2025-06-27 10:53:25+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
A remark, You tend to oversize the buildings you map. Stay within the rooflines. These huts have an overhang, so they show to be bigger than they are. Zoom in (IDeditor) till at least 40 ft. to have a good view to map a building
Best regards
Frans S (2025-06-28 12:26:02+00:00): Thanks for mapping. A remark, I noticed that the buildings you map often are a bit, more or less, oversized. Stay within the rooflines. These huts have an overhang, so they show to be bigger than they are. Zoom in (IDeditor) till at least 40 ft. to have a good view to map a building Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168169627
timothé baleras (2025-06-27 07:02:47+00:00): It was a survey
Gregory Peony (2025-06-28 18:31:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution. The footprints you added here are all valid and appropriately shaped but oversized. Please read my project comment regarding this topic. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168169811
Frans S (2025-06-29 12:53:14+00:00): Added building tags
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168169838
Frans S (2025-06-27 14:19:01+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
A remark, You tend to oversize the buildings you map. Stay within the rooflines. These huts have an overhang, so they show to be bigger than they are. Zoom in (IDeditor) till at least 40 ft. to have a good view to map a building
Best regards
Frans S (2025-06-27 12:58:39+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
A remark, You tend to oversize the buildings you map. Stay within the rooflines. These huts have an overhang, so they show to be bigger than they are. Zoom in (IDeditor) till at least 40 ft. to have a good view to map a building
Best regards
eggie (2025-06-27 07:55:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback..  Het is niet de bedoeling om adresnodes aan de straat te zetten. Die horen op de panden.
Ik heb een oprtit ingetekend. Nu zal het adres wel gevonden worden denk ik vanaf De Braam.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
DirkW123 (2025-06-28 08:04:53+00:00): Bedankt!
mueschel (2025-06-28 10:50:42+00:00): Hallo,
schau bitte nochmal nach deinen destination-Tags.
Die übliche Reihenfolge der Subkeys ist eine andere, z.B. 
destination:lanes:ref:colour  -> destination:colour:ref:lanes
oder
destination:ref:forward:to -> destination:ref:to:forward
wegavision (2025-06-28 12:02:59+00:00): Ja ich bin noch am üben. leider gibt es keine wirkliche Anleitung, man muss solange probieren, bis es klappt.
wegavision (2025-06-28 12:04:21+00:00): Die neueren, die ich gestern in Bayern gemacht habe, stimen langsam, wobei ich immer noch probleme mit dem colour habe, das will manchmal bei -to nicht.
mueschel (2025-06-28 12:59:42+00:00): Dieses Schema hier sollte fast immer stimmen:

destination
[:hgv|:bicycle|...]
[:colour]
[:ref|:symbol|:street|...]
[:to]
[:lanes]
[:forward|:backward|:both_ways]
mueschel (2025-06-29 10:14:15+00:00): Hier sind die Änderungen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168258545#map=12/50.0849/12.5348
Gregory Peony (2025-06-28 18:30:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution. The buildings you added here are valis and accurately shaped but are oversized. See my project comment regarding this subject. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168170665
Frans S (2025-06-29 12:39:51+00:00):  Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project. 
A remark.
I noticed that the buildings you map often are a bit, more or less, oversized. Please stay within the rooflines. These huts have an overhang, so they show to be bigger than they are. Zoom in (IDeditor) till at least 40 ft. to have a good view to map a building.
Best regards and keep mapping.
Frans S (2025-07-01 07:54:17+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project. 
A remark.
I noticed that the buildings you map often are a bit, more or less, oversized. Please stay within the rooflines. These huts have an overhang, so they show to be bigger than they are. Zoom in (IDeditor) till at least 40 ft. to have a good view to map a building.


Gregory Peony wrote an article about this 
in the Questions and comment section of this program.
About Mapping Accurate Building Size.
Check it please.
Best regards and keep mapping
Gregory Peony (2025-06-28 18:17:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution. All footprints you digitised here are valid and apropriately shaped but slightly oversized. See my project comment on this subject. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168170790
YuliyaSurta (2025-06-27 07:26:36+00:00): Also fixed road geometry.
YuliyaSurta (2025-06-27 07:29:56+00:00): USGS 3D Elevation Program was used as evidence as well.
Gregory Peony (2025-06-28 18:02:46+00:00): Hi Brandon, Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution. You correctly identified the buildings you added here and circularised them appropriately however they are generally oversized. See my project comment redarding this subject. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168170853
Frans S (2025-06-27 10:42:17+00:00): Hello. 
Your mappings here are far oversized. A building with a dia of 5 mtr has been mapped with a dia of 14 MTR ? This does not reflect the reality.
Don't you zoom in far enough in Ideditor ? 
Zoom to 40 ft at minimum to get a clear view of a building.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168170932
Frans S (2025-06-27 12:33:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
A remark, You tend to oversize the buildings you map. Stay within the rooflines. These huts have an overhang, so they show to be bigger than they are. Zoom in (IDeditor) till at least 40 ft. to have a good view to map a building
Best regards
Frans S (2025-06-30 12:12:53+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Most of these objects are trees.
Buildings are mostly brownish and have a regular round shape.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168171037
DodoGTA (2025-06-29 18:20:05+00:00): I meant to type addr:contact here (I'll re-add the correct key soon)
FraukeLeo (2026-03-21 12:04:33+00:00): Hallo, der Punkt ist dir aber übel verrutscht, bitte aufpassen: https://ibb.co/LdVFmkpz
surveyor54 (2026-03-21 22:39:11+00:00): Danke für korrigieren. Werde es mir merken.
BCNorwich (2025-06-28 05:22:39+00:00): Duplicated highway removed.
yrtimiD (2025-06-27 14:19:44+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contribution!

Few notes if you don't mind:
1. usually there is no need to add "addr:city" as everything is already surrounded by a big place polygon so actual city can be easily calculated.
2. please avoid having double-valued tags, they are almost always wrong (addr:city)

you are welcome to our Israel-specific wiki page where you'll find many local conventions and community contacts
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel

happy mapping!
Amitt314 (2025-06-27 16:16:02+00:00): Thank you for your notes.
I will take this into account next time.
bxl-forever (2025-06-27 10:48:45+00:00): Hello.

Can you please not attach landuse areas to roads/footways/cycleways.  Look at this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1409992061 which you attached to two nodes of an existing cycleway.

Also, please use real titles describing your changes.  Claiming to "add landuses Ronse" while you are actually adding companies to the map or changing addresses is not a correct way to map.  The changeset title must correctly describe what you are doing on the map.  If you want to perform various actions, it is recommended to upload them separately.

Thanks in advance.
dcapillae (2025-06-27 09:05:58+00:00): Buenos días.

Este conjunto de cambios fue revertido.

Cada contenedor de reciclaje se destina a un tipo de residuo diferente, no se deben mezclar. Se mapean como un nodo independiente para no mezclar tipos de residuos diferentes en un mismo contenedor: un contenedor --> un nodo.

Hay que asegurarse de que no haya ya un contenedor en el mapa para el tipo de residuo que deseamos añadir. Normalmente suelen estar cerca unos de otros.

Contenedor azul (papel y cartón):
recycling:paper=yes
recycling:magazines=yes
recycling:cardboard=yes
recycling:newspaper=yes
recycling:paper_packaging=yes

Contenedor amarillo (latas, envases y botellas de plástico):
recycling:plastic_packaging=yes
recycling:plastic_bottles=yes
recycling:cans=yes

Contenedor verde (botellas de cristal):
recycling:glass_bottles=yes

Contenedor marrón (restos orgánicos)
Respecto a los contenedores marrones (residuos orgánicos), dado que aceptan tanto restos de comida como restos vegetales (flores u hojarasca) sería conveniente etiquetarlos como «recycling:organic=yes». osm.org/user/dcapillae/diary/400818

Si desea obtener ayuda sobre cómo empezar a mapear, en el wiki encontrará una guía para principiantes: osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide. En el wiki también hay una página dedicada a la ciudad de Málaga y su municipio: osm.wiki/ES:M%C3%A1laga.

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
Virgile1994 (2025-08-03 17:31:16+00:00): Comme tu le dis, les quais sont toujours là. Certes inutilisés, mais là. Donc on ne va pas supprimer quelque chose qui existe toujours.
aceman444 (2025-06-30 21:04:25+00:00): Dakujem za doplnenia, ale uvadzajte aj zdroje. Adresu novej budovy na Ortofotomozaiky nevidite.
priean (2025-07-01 06:26:17+00:00): zdroj list vlastníctva na zbgis keď to potrebujete vedieť
aceman444 (2025-07-03 18:18:54+00:00): Ano, a potrebuju to vediet vsetci, treba to vzdy pisat do sad zmien, alebo najlepsie na kazdy objekt, kedze mozu byt z roznych zdrojov.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-06 04:19:27+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam tags for Two Men and a Truck POI in changeset 183721713

https://osm.org/changeset/183721713