piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-01-31 07:30:12+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 34 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/215280312 v7 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1472545303 v4 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1471432877 v3 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/2246831758 v5
https://osm.org/node/13511117153 v2
https://osm.org/node/13502373805 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177899356
NeisReview (2026-02-07 07:49:05+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178030774
Dimitar155 (2026-02-10 13:24:26+00:00): Този шкаф за пратки на dm май не е точно шкаф за пратки? Изглежда че може да поръчаш нещо от този магазин онлайн, служител да го опакова и да си го вземеш от същия шкаф в рамките на деня. Външни пратки не дава.
Fraxi (2026-02-10 13:53:49+00:00): Намира се вдясно, като влезнеш. Ти видя ли го? Ами на такова ми е приличало. Ако искаш, смени тага.
Dimitar155 (2026-02-10 19:59:56+00:00): Не съм влизал скоро, просто видях че има нова иконка на това място :)

Иначе погледнах https://www.dm-drogeriemarkt.bg/services/onlayn-magazin/izprashtane-i-dostavka/dm-stantsia-3042212, за да видя какво представлява, но не виждам как може да се отбележи по друг начин за момента.
Fraxi (2026-02-10 20:09:07+00:00): dm "станция" wow
Fraxi (2026-02-10 20:47:24+00:00): Не знам, направих overpass заявка  и май като моята находка никъде нЕма :D
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2kkC
Трябва да видя и с други разновидности на operator=*
Dimitar155 (2026-02-10 21:01:42+00:00): node/12277793017, други май няма
Fraxi (2026-02-10 21:15:25+00:00): Ето още 2:
node/13167512701
node/12394334303
rarad74 (2026-01-30 18:43:07+00:00): Salut. Ma intrebai de cladiri , cum ca nu sunt desenate. Vad ca tu stergi cladiri...
dknelson9876 (2026-02-03 03:03:20+00:00): Hi Halfdeaf007,

Why did you create multipolygons that cut out the parking lots for these landuses? A landuse area is meant to cover the full area used for something, not just the areas that aren't parking.
Leo Slager (2026-01-31 00:09:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2026-01-31 00:18:57+00:00): Dag McWoolfe,
Het is goed om te weten dat we in NL de adressen niet taggen op de omtrek van de gebouwen.

De gebouwen en de adressen worden rechtstreeks geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG van het Kadaster.
De adressen staan dan op een aparte node en zijn dus al aanwezig in de database.
Dat is vooral handig als er meerdere adressen en/of bedrijven in 1 gebouw zijn.

Ik pas het even aan.
NeisBot (2026-01-31 07:31:33+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13512693722 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Law office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-08 09:28:14+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178257647
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 13:07:29+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184431379

https://osm.org/changeset/184431379
Wanderer2000 (2026-01-30 18:12:23+00:00): Hoi McWoofle,
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap en bedankt voor je bijdrage. Gelijk even wat feedback.
In Nederland worden de adressen rechtstreeks uit de BAG geimporteerd als nodes, en zetten we het adres dus niet op gebouwen. Zou je de adressen weer van de huizen willen halen? 
Groetjes Wanderer
alexey_zakharenkov (2026-03-22 08:21:52+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Вы нарисовали отдельной линией участок дороги https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1472767017, который на местности никак не выделен, даже разметкой. Он совершенно лишний. Удалите, пожалуйста.
Valerio Cardone (2026-01-31 20:43:08+00:00): Ciao, perché hai classificato i binari di Via Chiesa della Salute, Via Bibiana, Via Della Cella e Via Massari come tranvie in costruzione?
AwFi (2026-01-31 21:24:36+00:00): Ciao, l'ho fatto perché mi hanno mandato delle foto dove si vedevano lavorazioni ai binari in parecchi punti, e perché in generale mi sembra stiano facendo qualche lavoro prima di metterli in esercizio. Se sai e preferisci indicare con più precisione dove sono i lavori fai pure, purtroppo non avevo indicazioni molto precise.
kingkingHK (2026-01-31 03:48:45+00:00): IIRC no buses stop at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439462752 , so it probably shouldn't get `bus=yes`.
ssundell (2026-01-31 16:29:56+00:00): MoI! Hyvältä näyttää, mutta jäin miettimään, miksi tuolle yhdelle pihatieksi/tonttiliittymäksi merkitylle väylälle on muutettu tyypiksi residential? Sehän tarkoittaa siis asuinkatua, jonka varressa on yleensä useita asuintaloja, ja käytännössä ne ovat useimmiten myös nimettyjä.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177901085
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-03 19:33:33+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13512505055/history has bicycle:repair = no that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle:repair and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service:bicycle:repair
minirevollo (2026-02-03 19:49:04+00:00): Hi, thank you for your information. I changed the tag.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-03 20:24:21+00:00): Thanks!
Frans S (2026-03-18 10:34:40+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
You tagged most (approx. 160) paths in part as highway=unclassified. 
Check this wiki where you can use this tag.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
A major requirement is the width of a road.
Here, just a few throughgoing roads fulfill the classification of highway-unclassified. Most are just paths. Connecting buildings and buildings to roads.
I change most of them
Best regards, and keep mapping
alexey_zakharenkov (2026-03-22 08:25:35+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Вы нарисовали участок дороги https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1472769095 , который никак не выделен, даже разметкой. Он совершенно лишний. Удалите, пожалуйста.

И давайте, пожалуйста, осмысленные комментарии к пакетам правок.
Leo Slager (2026-01-31 00:19:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
ika-chan! (2026-01-31 05:02:05+00:00): Hello, the service roads that you added are in fact disused. The ways have been updated to reflect the current situation.
baku_the_cat (2026-02-02 03:04:10+00:00): could not locate this flock. is this information correct?
TinPetreković (2026-02-02 13:41:10+00:00): The restrictions on the node and segment that were accidentally tagged have been removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178007480
NeisBot (2026-01-31 07:30:18+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1472774098 v1 | 7 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177902166
NeisReview (2026-02-07 07:49:05+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178098649
onterof (2026-02-09 09:09:13+00:00): Hallo, beim Verschieben von Windkraftanlagen bitte mehr Vorsicht walten lassen. node/1900256513 wurde abgebaut, es wurde eine neue Anlage errichtet - erkennbar, man die verschieden Luftbilder vergleicht.
Nach dem Grundsatz "ein Objekt = eine Identität" sollte man dann ein neues Objekt anlegen und das alte als razed/removed markieren. So sind die Daten leider vermengt.
Hab das mal korrigiert.
Grüße
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-17 22:35:28+00:00): Maybe should be scrubbed entirely given the stated source of Google Maps, per OSM policy?
Baloo Uriza (2026-02-10 17:38:25+00:00): If there's no lane markings (and it doesn't look like there are from the Mapbox aerial), then lane_markings=no are what you want, and no lanes=2.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177903313
Albattar 53 (2026-02-09 17:48:05+00:00): Tempat karaoke di braga bandung yang mewah
Baloo Uriza (2026-02-10 17:37:49+00:00): You might be missing building=detached (if this is a house).  Buildings are a good basic object to put address information on.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177903480
Baloo Uriza (2026-02-10 17:36:39+00:00): Generally speaking, adding addr:* to highway=* objects doesn't really have expected results.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177903528
Frans S (2026-02-07 15:11:28+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Short tracks leading to isolated buildings or company can be tagged as 'service"
Tag highways as 'track'only in cases described in the wiki.
Best regards
Best regards
Rainero (2026-02-26 18:30:09+00:00): Hallo asdfyxcv0104,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, dass du mithilfst die OSM-Daten aktuell zu halten.
In diesem Fall hat das leider nur halb geklappt, denn du hast das Café Cade doppelt angelegt, vermutlich als du die Öffnungszeiten korrigieren wolltest. Außerdem gab es schon einen Punkt des früheren Cafés, der mit "disused" markiert war. In solchen Fällen entfernen wir das "disused", verschieben den Namen in old_name, überprüfen und aktualisieren evtl. noch vorhandene Attribute und ergänzen fehlende Attribute (OSM-Sprech: Tags). 
Ich weiß nicht wie gut der Editor von Organic Maps das kann, weil ich die App nicht verwende. Für iOS gibt es den Editor Go Map!!, ansonsten gibt es den Editor iD im Browser oder den JOSM, beide für PCs aller Betriebssysteme.

Hier habe ich deine beiden Cafés mit dem Punkt des früheren Cafés zusammengeführt, so dass jetzt alles passt.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
NeisBot (2026-01-31 07:31:38+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13456857964 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mexican restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-08 09:28:14+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178257651
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-31 07:31:39+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/337074232 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Taqueria Mexico"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-08 09:28:15+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178257652
(No visible changes after review)
Wanderer2000 (2026-01-31 21:52:17+00:00): Hoi router, lock=yes wordt gebruikt voor sluizen. Voor een hek dat op slot zit gebruiken we locked=yes. Ik heb het aangepast.
yelisey90 (2026-01-30 21:27:37+00:00): Hi! Consider using barrier=fence + fence_type=railing for such king of fences between roads and footpaths. There's a preset in iD, just type "railing"
sykul (2026-02-01 19:39:29+00:00): Bonjour. Merci pour vos mises à jour. Si vous souhaitez indiquer que les refuges sont fermés, il est préférable d'utiliser d'autres balises pour le signaler. La balise « name » ne doit servir qu'à indiquer le nom, donc à moins que le nom ne soit « fermé », il ne doit pas apparaître dans le nom.
Peut-être « access=no » ? Ou « disused:tourism » ? Quelqu'un aura peut-être une meilleure idée, mais certainement pas dans le nom.

Traduit avec DeepL.com (version gratuite)

Hello. Thanks for your updates. If you want to indicate that the huts are closed, it is better to use other tags to show this. The name tag should only be for the name, so unless the name is "fermé", it should have that in the name.
perhaps access=no? or disused:tourism? Maybe someone has a better idea, but definitely not in the name
TinPetreković (2026-02-02 14:16:03+00:00): Accidental tag on the node has been removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177906282

Accidental tag on the segment after the bridge has been removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178008878
Glassman (2026-01-31 00:35:36+00:00): Is "Illegal Dirtbike trail" the acutal name or just what it is?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177906124
VeryFakeName (2026-07-22 18:32:29+00:00): sorry for the delay, the email notification went to spam.

Its a trail created without permission from DNR.. its built on top of an old railroad bed which I uncovered rail spikes and old ties. So essentially whoever cut in the new trail was just exposing some old abandoned trail.
Glassman (2026-07-22 18:41:15+00:00): I see another user removed the trail a couple of months ago.
VeryFakeName (2026-07-22 19:29:37+00:00): Very likely trying to cover up the trails existence.. and why I decided to use a veryfakename when creating it. Ive drawn it in again.
VeryFakeName (2026-07-22 19:31:35+00:00): OK.. I found a link to their deletion. I'll physically visit the area again myself to survey it.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-02-01 12:44:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177962210 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes that the local community have confirmed as fantasy.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19735
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-02-01 12:44:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177962210 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes that the local community have confirmed as fantasy.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19735
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-02-01 12:44:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177962210 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes that the local community have confirmed as fantasy.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19735
yelisey90 (2026-01-30 21:23:41+00:00): reverted - duplicated nodes (bug?)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177907213
NeisBot (2026-01-31 07:31:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13507081561 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Lawnmower store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-08 09:28:15+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178257653
(No visible changes after review)
samjcorbin (2026-04-26 10:01:26+00:00): Hi there, I’ve reverted these changes as “Bewley” is not the correct name in English, nor is it a local name. For adding phonetic pronunciation, please see the name:pronunciation tag - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:pronunciation

Thanks
conifermapper (2026-04-26 12:31:57+00:00): Bewley was in fact changed(one could say corrupted) to 'beaulieu' in the 17/1800s as a stylistic change to attract visitors. The original name was Bewley as descended from old Norman phonology of 'Beautiful Place' which I know quite well from local history(of which I have great interest in). Obviously the Main name is still retained anyway as beaulieu! Live and let live?
conifermapper (2026-04-26 12:33:06+00:00): See the location of 'Purley' in London for another example of this phonetic spelling- not a mistake but actual local name
samjcorbin (2026-04-26 12:58:55+00:00): If the name is no longer in common usage then it shouldn’t really be on OSM - OpenHistoricalMap would be a better fit for this. The name:en tag is essentially the “main name” for anyone browsing the map in English, as data consumers will prioritise language-specific tags over generic “name” tags.
samjcorbin (2026-04-26 13:08:38+00:00): I’ve reverted these changes again - please read the docs and do not use name:en for archaic/historical names.
felipeeugenio (2026-02-01 13:47:23+00:00): Hello, Thankns for your editions.
You added a lot of properties for the camping as a whole. But then replicated them into the camping´s building. I´ll se what i can do. Regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177906954
gurglypipe (2026-01-30 21:30:05+00:00): Was https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1472817871 meant to be industrial=railway landuse=railway? Those tags don’t quite seem to match the rest of the tagging in this changeset.
NorthYorkshire (2026-01-30 21:33:50+00:00): It wasn't, thanks for bringing this error to my attention it has now been rectified.
gurglypipe (2026-01-30 23:23:59+00:00): Cheers!
NeisBot (2026-01-31 07:31:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13452336452 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Land office"
---
Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего текста могла бы быть: "Земельное бюро"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
Кадастровый номер (2026-01-31 07:53:03+00:00): Фирма по оформлению земли и недвижимости
lakedistrict (2026-01-30 21:38:19+00:00): (Bing alignment 1.27, -1.47 at McDonald Road)
olo81 (2026-01-31 18:20:34+00:00): Dlaczego skasowałeś shop=supermarket ? 
Sklep został zlikwidowany?
C2oc4 (2026-02-26 15:30:49+00:00): tak
olo81 (2026-02-26 17:04:42+00:00): To dlaczego nazwa sklepu została?
olo81 (2026-02-26 17:05:47+00:00): I opis zestawu zmian nic nie mówi o likwidacji sklepu
C2oc4 (2026-05-24 07:17:56+00:00): moje przeoczenie sory
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-25 07:55:29+00:00): to poprawisz to?

czy tam szyld został czy co?
C2oc4 (2026-07-11 06:50:58+00:00): nie ma nic
Protoxenus (2026-02-01 16:57:30+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_nicht_das_Name-Tag,_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben
JeroenHoek (2026-06-14 14:57:26+00:00): Waarom zette je dat pand bij de Central weer op construction? Tip: kijk even naar de geschiedenis. We lopen ook wel eens voor op de BAG.
pertile (2026-03-05 12:06:18+00:00): Hola, deshice el cambio de proposed a construction en el tramo de la autovía Punilla al norte de Cosquín dado que la misma por ahora es solo un proyecto.
NeisBot (2026-01-31 07:31:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13510760066 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Home Store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-08 09:28:16+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178257654
(No visible changes after review)
KennyDap (2026-01-31 03:15:26+00:00): Vandalism Fix

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177913003
NieWnen (2026-07-30 14:43:54+00:00): Dla biletomatów może lepsze by było network=Warszawska Kolej Dojazdowa zamiast operator=*, trochę idąc za tym jak są tagowane warszawskie biletomaty, bo te operatora mają Mennicę. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:vending%3Dpublic_transport_tickets

Jako, że właśnie kończą wymieniać biletomaty na nowe, to może warto to tagowanie zmienić na network WKD + operator Mera?

Co o tym myślisz?
dzamper (2026-07-30 14:48:56+00:00): Ja jestem za

Moim celem w tym changeset było wyłącznie ujednolicenie tych wartości które w ramach danego klucza już i tak były wprowadzone, a nie wprowadzanie nowych danych czy ocena słuszności wyboru jednego klucza nad drugim
*Martin* (2026-01-31 10:26:17+00:00): Ahoj Peťo.

Vidím, že dosť edituješ landcover a preto ti dávam do pozornosti nástroj na www.freemap.sk, ktorý ti pre zvolenú oblasť "obkreslí" lesy/lúky: https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/d_6Csbkc5gw/m/5DhuXdsoAgAJ

Editovať potom odporúčam v editore JOSM. Ak niečo, kľudne mi napíš.
aixbrick (2026-01-31 10:15:29+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
bitte keine Bürgersteige als separate Wege erfassen, wenn diese nicht baulich von der Straße getrennt sind (baulich getrennt = es besteht für einen Fußgänger keine oder nur mit Hürden verbundene Möglichkeit vom Bürgersteig auf die Straße zu wechseln). Die Bürgersteige waren hier bereits als Tags an der Straße erfasst, was vollkommen korrekt war.
Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Gehsteig#Wie_kartieren?
Gruß
Flusssvie (2026-01-31 12:06:30+00:00): Hallo,
vielen Dank für den Hinweis. 
Ich hatte den Artikel gelesen, allerdings habe ich ihn so verstanden, dass es durchaus hilfreich sein kann, die Gehwege separat einzutragen. Ich hatte dies gemacht, da an der Schloss-Schönau-Str und der Von-Broich-Str., zwischen dem Gehweg und der Straße, Parkbuchten sind und ich den korrekten Verlauf des Gehwegs abbilden wollte.
Gruß