piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
felipeeugenio (2026-06-25 18:59:55+00:00): Hola. Un galpón es compartido por una facrica de mallas y por un gimnasio? está bien? Solo para confirmar.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184601840
Bsnn (2026-06-25 19:38:03+00:00): Si, son 3 galpones, dos de ellos para la fabrica y el tercero es un gimnasio.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184601840
felipeeugenio (2026-06-25 19:44:32+00:00): ok, gracias
felipeeugenio (2026-06-26 13:30:44+00:00): Hola. por favor no usar nombres genéricos. Si no conoce el nombre no agregarlo simplemente.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184602132
frydzio (2026-06-25 21:33:39+00:00): Ulica objęta zridem będzie budowana w śladzie istniejącej ulicy więc błędnie ją wyrysowałeś. Porównaj https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/pl/map/siekierki-inwestycje_1055589#17/52.183047/21.076208
Po drugie 'unclassified' to coś między 'residential' a 'tertiary', czyli przenosi trochę ruchu o dalszym zasięgu. Tutaj to będzie po prostu dojazdówka do osiedla, więc co najwyżej 'residential'
Fraxi (2026-06-25 19:35:13+00:00): Ако искаш, мини някой път отблизо до входовете и ще видиш откъде идва объркването.
Fraxi (2026-06-28 19:03:33+00:00): Гледай сега какво показват 4 табели за тези 2 сгради(преди малко минах):1. За първата сграда, където е оптиката, пише:"ул. Ген. Стефан Тошев 8, бл. 5". Това е първия вход. 2. След това в СИ посока, за входа до Ролпласт-пак "№8, вх. А". 3. Още един вход, близо до банката - "№8А, вх. Б". И в другия ъгъл на същия вход табелка с "8". А, кажи ми сега.
Dimitar155 (2026-06-28 20:44:15+00:00): В кадастъра са си окей. Знам че там понякога не са верни, но цъкнах и случайни апартаменти в сградите и нямаше разминавания.
felipeeugenio (2026-06-26 13:25:35+00:00): Hola. una iglesia no es una tienda, es amenity=place_of_workship.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184602522
felipeeugenio (2026-06-26 13:23:55+00:00): Hola. Los nombres antiguos se agregan en old_name=

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184602646
felipeeugenio (2026-06-26 13:27:06+00:00): Hola. una estatua no es una tienda. Puede encontrar cómo agregar una estatua en este link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:artwork_type%3Dstatue

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184602873
rhhs (2026-07-02 19:38:26+00:00): Is this at the correct location? The house number mapped is No. 4, but the node is inside No. 2.
Anyway, if the node is inside a building which already has an address, there is no need to add it to the node as well (unless it is different). Please also add +359 in front of any Bulgarian phone numbers, and update any checkdate tags
C2oc4 (2026-07-11 13:48:12+00:00): Cześć. Przeszukałem neta i nie znalazłem takiej nazwy, masz źródło?
C2oc4 (2026-07-11 13:50:18+00:00): Dobra mam :)
Nakaner-repair (2026-07-02 08:15:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184960823 where the changeset comment is: Revert all recent changesets (last 7 days) by ticki_52 due to vandalism. Revert 184929333, 184929605, 184929885 due to conflicts/double mapping.
pantufla (2026-06-28 13:47:24+00:00): No estoy con ello, pero yo pondría building=yes que para la mayoría de consumidores de datos es la forma en que interpretan que aquí había algo. Y de hecho, esta residencia está una buena parte aún de pie.
pantufla (2026-06-28 13:47:33+00:00): Hablo de Don Pepe
palamito (2026-06-28 16:12:12+00:00): Exacto ese fue otro de los errores, una etiqueta es para el colapso total, y otro para el colapso parcial, como el caso de las residencias Don Pepe
palamito (2026-06-28 16:14:29+00:00): En vez de destroyed:buiding, sería 'tag:ruins_building=yes'
Falkons (2026-06-30 18:42:36+00:00): Hi, adding description to show it is a buffered bike lane isn't really the correct approach. It is more recommended to add the tag "cycleway:buffer=yes" to show it is buffered. Here's the wiki for descriptions on how it can be done https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway:buffer
Falkons (2026-06-30 18:47:41+00:00): I believe cycleway=lane with buffer should be more appropriate unless there is a physical barrier separating where cars drive and bikes ride. For using cycleway:right or cycleway:left, it relative to the direction of the line segment (way) is pointing (should be small arrowing pointing the direction in the middle of the way). For this case on Auahi street it is from the top left to bottom right.
gc27 (2026-06-25 20:06:28+00:00): comment誤設定
タグの標準化・廃止地物の削除
Nakaner-repair (2026-07-02 08:15:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184960823 where the changeset comment is: Revert all recent changesets (last 7 days) by ticki_52 due to vandalism. Revert 184929333, 184929605, 184929885 due to conflicts/double mapping.
Matúš Tkáč (2026-06-25 20:15:53+00:00):  - Chybný názov projektu
Thomaso58 (2026-06-26 07:25:05+00:00): I see. The error in Bergamo has been fixed. Thank you. I have assumed that you are the person, that fixed it.
BR Thomas
dknelson9876 (2026-06-27 02:15:14+00:00): Hi carlosguerrero, as a local who has driven on these roads, I can verify that this traffic light operates on a specific cycle to make this movement possible and this turn restriction is incorrect. I could see an implicit restriction for HGV vehicles, since the space between lights is so short, if you feel that necessary.
carlosguerrero_lyft (2026-07-01 19:15:51+00:00): Hello, dknelson9876, 
My name is Carlos, and I’m part of the OSM team here at Lyft. Thank you for reaching out regarding these edits, and thank you for the feedback.
The local context you provided is incredibly valuable! That specific traffic light cycle makes complete sense and clears up our concern about crossing the westbound lanes. I have gone ahead and reverted the turn restriction based on your feedback.
Thanks again for helping us get this intersection right!
Happy mapping, Carlos
felipeeugenio (2026-06-26 12:51:03+00:00): Hola. En el minuto en el que te metes al predio mismo ya no son residenciales, son service + service=driveway. Yo lo corrijo.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184606967
felipeeugenio (2026-06-26 12:52:59+00:00): Además, en OSM, las calles son solo privadas (o al access= que sea, a partir del portón). Agregué eso también.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184606967
JJIglesias (2026-06-26 08:06:58+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
Mammi71 (2026-06-29 12:21:02+00:00): Hallo ticke_52, warum hast Du denn in diesem Changeset viele area:highway, dieverse footway und vorallem die ganzen parking_space entfernt?
silversurfer83 (2026-07-01 17:22:23+00:00): Moin

Großflächiges Löschen mutmaßlich sauber erfasst er Objekte ist kein "tagging revised".

Ich plädiere hier für einen umgehenden revert.
jengelh (2026-07-01 18:02:44+00:00): der User macht nur Blödsinn. weitere cs 184810244, 184806307, 184664051, 184748693
jengelh (2026-07-01 20:11:55+00:00): reverted with 184929885
Herwescheluc (2026-07-01 20:44:07+00:00): 1+
trial (2026-07-02 06:50:44+00:00): +1
Nakaner-repair (2026-07-02 08:15:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184960823 where the changeset comment is: Revert all recent changesets (last 7 days) by ticki_52 due to vandalism. Revert 184929333, 184929605, 184929885 due to conflicts/double mapping.
ticki_52 (2026-07-08 13:32:19+00:00): @ mammi71: 
Die area:highway‑Flächen  überdeckten die bereits korrekt gemappten highway=footway‑Linien.
area:highway und highway=footway innerhalb der selben Fläche bedeuten eine doppelte Erfassung derselben Information. Fußwege werden in OSM als Linien gemappt; zusätzliche Flächen erzeugen redundante Geometrien und Darstellungsprobleme. Die betreffenden Flächen waren überflüssig und wurden entfernt.
ticki_52 (2026-07-08 13:44:53+00:00): Kommentar von silversurfer83 
"Großflächiges Löschen mutmaßlich sauber erfasst er Objekte ist kein "tagging revised". Ich plädiere hier für einen umgehenden revert."

Kommentar von jengelh  
"Der User macht nur Blödsinn. weitere cs 184810244, 184806307, 184664051, 184748693"

Kommentar von jengelh 
"reverted with 184929885"
-----------------------------------
Ich bezweifle, dass diese Pauschalurteile das Revertieren von vielen Stunden Arbeit ohne jegliche Rücksprache mit dem Betroffenen unter der Überschrift "Vandalismus" rechtfertigen. Sicher bin ich allerdings, dass dieses Vorgehen (unter dem Beifall der "Claqueure" Herwescheluc und trial) keinesfalls den OSM-Standards entspricht. Gerne bin ich bereit, die Motivation meiner Aktivitäten weiterhin offenzulegen, wenn es um eine konkrete Änderung geht.

Ich erwarte eure Anfragen

Grüße ticki_52
ticki_52 (2026-07-08 13:48:39+00:00): Hinweis: Mein vorheriger Kommentar war in der Formulierung zu zugespitzt.
Mir geht es ausschließlich um die fachliche Bewertung der Änderungen und des Reverts.
Ich beantworte gern konkrete Fragen zu einzelnen Objekten oder Tagging‑Entscheidungen.
trial (2026-07-08 14:34:55+00:00): Ohne Pauschal dann: warum hast Du https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1496769138#map=19/51.271952/9.525739&layers=N entfernt? Deine Antwort: keine. Frage war schon gestellt: "vorallem die ganzen parking_space entfernt?"

Weil Du +1 nicht magst, soll ich as für alle parking_spage sagen? Ist es nicht lesbarer +1 zu sagen?
jengelh (2026-07-08 14:43:01+00:00): >Ich bezweifle, dass diese Pauschalurteile das Revertieren von vielen Stunden Arbeit ohne jegliche Rücksprache mit dem Betroffenen unter der Überschrift "Vandalismus" rechtfertigen

...sagt ausgerechnet derjenige, der alle Einzelparkplätze entfernt hat (fachlich: voll scheiße). Deine Opfer-Täter-Umkehr zieht leider nicht.
silversurfer83 (2026-07-08 16:35:58+00:00): @ticki
es ist absolut üblich und in Ordnung einen way für zB highway=footway und *zusätzlich* die genaue Flächenausdehnung mit einem area:highway=* zu erfassen. "Verdeckung" ist ein Problem des Renderes und sollte nicht dazu führen, dass du korrekt erfasste Flächen löscht. Lass das!

Es fehlt weiterhin eine Erklärung, warum du sauber erfasste einzelne Parkplätze löscht. Innerhalb eines amenity=parking sind einzelne amenity=parking_space absolut legitim und sollten keinesfalls gelöscht werden so lange sie nicht objektiv falsch erfasst wurden.

Also: Warum löscht du Parkplätze?
trial (2026-07-08 16:54:27+00:00): @silversurfer83, die Antwort auf "Warum löscht du Parkplätze?" steht schon im CS-Kommentar https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184929885#map=19/51.272098/9.526037&layers=S .;-)
Übrigens, @ticki_52, wenn es weil du es nicht sehen willst, kannst Du einfach Shortbread nutzen.
Herwescheluc (2026-07-08 17:52:50+00:00): Hallo, ticky_52,

in meinem Leben wurde ich vieles genannt - Claqueur war bisher nicht dabei! Andreas ist aber der Name, auf den ich am besten höre...

Ich habe den Äußerungen der "Vorredner" bewusst zugestimmt und wollte mit meinem 1+ Dir zu erkennen geben, das die nicht alleine dastehen. Da gab's nichts weiter zu ergänzen und den Revert fand ich sehr ok!

Meine persönliche Meinung zu Deinem Verhalten habe ich deutlich hier: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/loschung-von-parking-aisle-und-parking-space/145018/8 geäußert, damit Du dort direkt darauf hättest eingehen und Dich vielleicht erklären können.

Eine Anfrage habe ich aber noch: Fragst DU eigentlich freundlich (oder wenigstens überhaupt), bevor Du die mindestens genauso (meist sogar wesentlich mehr) aufwendigen Eintragungen anderer Mapper einfach in die Tonne haust? Ich habe nicht den Eindruck: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=12705050&commented

Nix für ungut, aber das geht einfach net!

Andreas
JJIglesias (2026-06-26 00:09:19+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
Joel Koen (2026-06-26 10:07:30+00:00): Hello Sue, thank you for you and your team's work on addresses through QLD.

Just wanted to flag this changeset, as your team seems to usually add unit numbers that aren't in QLD's address dataset, but QLD Addresses does have this block, and the data you've added doesn't match: https://imgtree.co/i/i4Lpji1 (the surrounding blocks also have unit data, I have hidden them)

Are you able to confirm that the QLD addresses are incorrect? I can import the unit addresses from the QLD database for this block if you'd like.
Joel Koen (2026-06-26 10:08:11+00:00): Oops, image link is https://imgtree.co/i/i4Lpji1f
JJIglesias (2026-06-26 08:04:17+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
ieguy3 (2026-07-07 01:54:23+00:00): that was the realignment directly from RCTC. oh osm doesn't allow you to source from google. any google sourcing eventually gets deleted
ieguy3 (2026-07-07 01:57:34+00:00): SR  79 north of domenigoni parkway is going to be freeway. RCTC is buying land for the freeway
StreetW (2026-07-07 02:30:28+00:00): Sorry about that. I learned about the google restrictions as reference. I also thought I restored the 79 items since I didn't mean to delete once I read up about it. It was first interfering with my new development but realized it was a future road.
ieguy3 (2026-07-07 05:58:24+00:00): don't worry about it. the alignment for phase 2 isn't set in stone if  i drew it over a housing tract. feel free to move it.  its hard to get the final alignment from RCTC.  i just wanted you to be aware about osm admins being weary of google references. phase 2 probably wont be constructed until after 2030 anyway. Ironically Phase 3 is going to be constructed first
user_5359 (2026-06-27 09:08:05+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1160451811, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1189813347. What is the mean of the tag DN22 = 7RR? Is this a copy & paste eroor of the postal_code?
philipcullen (2026-06-27 11:09:07+00:00): Good spot - that was a copy & paste error and should have been in addr:postcode. I've now fixed it.
jayaddison (2026-06-25 21:53:23+00:00): I plan to revert this; on closer inspection, these are not buildings; this changeset was within an area named as a cemetary.
jayaddison (2026-06-25 22:13:30+00:00): Reverted by changeset 184611424
pwbriggs (2026-07-02 04:52:37+00:00): Looks good; thanks for the contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
user_5359 (2026-06-28 07:37:52+00:00): Hallo! Sieh Dir bitte nochmal den Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13966179710 an. Was bedeutet denn Q17323478 = Q83415584 ?
friedl (2026-06-28 09:50:29+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, ist korrigiert.
MappingMore (2026-06-26 07:31:22+00:00): Revert of  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184594594
JJIglesias (2026-06-26 08:02:36+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
rarad74 (2026-06-26 08:22:02+00:00): :P
❤️‍🔥 (2026-06-28 00:04:24+00:00): whoops my bad ! btw i love all the detail you’ve been adding around north syd !!
arctic-rocinante (2026-06-28 10:00:13+00:00): No worries! And thanks, likewise!!
mueschel (2026-07-06 16:53:16+00:00): Please check your edits. "complete_name=" is not a valid key - please use the common name tags. I also found cases where the name in this tag didn't fit at all with the 'name' tag.
jayaddison (2026-06-25 22:13:48+00:00): (this changeset is a revert of changeset 184609727)
Wildsharky (2026-06-30 09:25:12+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184634726
dknelson9876 (2026-06-27 01:37:26+00:00): Did you do anything weird while working on this changeset (intentionally or accidentally) that you think would have caused the history of a lot of these ways to be deleted and re-added as new ways?
TheConductor (2026-06-27 03:40:07+00:00): My guess is it has to do with ways being split. If it helps you, I've returned the history to some of the way you may have been referring to. Others were new ways so there's no history to return. Happy mapping!
MappingMore (2026-06-30 05:06:25+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184833719
Frans S (2026-06-26 08:10:56+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A few remarks.
Please map more accurately and don't cluster buildings.
Don't connect nodes of buildings to each other and square the rectangular buildings, please.
Quality prevails above quantity!
Best regards
Frans S (2026-06-26 08:19:06+00:00): Hello again.
Please pay attention how high buildings with visible sidewalls need to be mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1532450849/history

map high and high-rise buidings
https://youtu.be/u31wPYWkm3E?si=lDbvDutpUyZWQXXL

Best regards
JJIglesias (2026-06-26 08:00:25+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
Marisol López Galvis (2026-07-01 00:59:42+00:00): Hola Julio: Gracias por la retroalimentación. La tendré en cuenta.
Frans S (2026-06-26 07:55:39+00:00): Hello.
Thanks for mapping
When you see an irregularly formed white object, it is mostly a building with a roof where the sun is reflected.
Just map it as a building, please.
Best regards and keep mapping.
jayaddison (2026-06-26 19:24:03+00:00): Ok; yes, I noticed that and wasn't sure what it was (and omitted it).  In future I'll map similar artifacts as buildings.  Thank you, Frans.
rebelahc (2026-07-05 22:59:38+00:00): GEOMETRIA
Nakaner-repair (2026-07-02 08:15:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184960823 where the changeset comment is: Revert all recent changesets (last 7 days) by ticki_52 due to vandalism. Revert 184929333, 184929605, 184929885 due to conflicts/double mapping.
ftrebien (2026-06-26 13:12:02+00:00): Essa pista deixou de ser rota principal há mais de 10 anos, não pode ser troncal. Favor seguir as regras do sistema de classificação em vigor.
yelisey90 (2026-06-27 16:31:54+00:00): partly reverted - same comment as here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184454292

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184702222
Alshowaiey (2026-06-26 10:59:58+00:00): السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاتة
شكرا على مساهمتك لكن توجد ملاحظة على اضافة اسماء المنازل
سياسات خرائط الشارع المفتوح تقتضي بعدم اضافة الاماكن الشخصية
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapping_private_information
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184620197
JJIglesias (2026-06-26 07:59:08+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
JJIglesias (2026-06-26 07:58:48+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
tian2992 (2026-06-29 05:02:13+00:00): Gracias por el comment. tomare en cuenta para evitar re-trabajo. Gracias por validar
b-jazz (2026-06-29 17:15:00+00:00): FYI, hole direction matters when you draw the centerline. It should be from the tee to the hole. Thanks. I've fixed the ones here that I've found.
lbilldt (2026-06-29 19:27:43+00:00): Hey b-jazz. Thanks for making the corrections. I was made aware of this previously. I noticed on some of the lines I could not see the arrows that indicate direction. Typically I just copy paste to stay consistent with tags. Probably some minor user error thing not letting the arrows show up. I'll figure out before updating further. Thanks again.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-26 05:08:31+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20867
tastycrackers (2026-06-30 21:28:52+00:00): For those who are reading this in the future. It appears that the Comaps editor inherited an upstream issue from Organic Maps where ghost edits are made unexpectedly that create numerous poi versions.

Like for example a mapper opens the mobile app and adds details to a coffee shop where there's a small chance that their client becomes self-possessed and creates 15 pointless alternative versions on its own. If this happens to you the best thing to do is to revoke access to Comaps to contain the issue from adding unnecessary clutter to the openstreetmap db and report the behavior to the issues below.

Related issues:

https://codeberg.org/comaps/comaps/issues/3186

https://codeberg.org/comaps/comaps/issues/1594
Tech Dec (2026-06-28 00:25:02+00:00): You cannot use Google Maps as source for OSM. See osm.wiki/Google
Reverted in changeset 184719287
JJIglesias (2026-06-26 07:57:33+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias