piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:26:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:22:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
eggie (2024-03-18 06:24:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-03-18 06:26:20+00:00): Dag kakomi   Svp adressen intact laten. Haal alleen de bedrijfsinfo eraf.
Ik zal het adres herstellen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-03-18 06:35:54+00:00): Dag kakomi De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode nr 6.
MVG
eggie
francians (2024-03-18 05:16:41+00:00): Ciao,

Questa modifica non va bene.
Le informazioni sugli indirizzi non vanno sugli edifici, inoltre hai sovrapposto un edificio all'altro. Mentre andava "spezzato" quello che già c'era. Puoi sistemare? Viceversa provvederò ad annullare le modifiche.
Grazie
Francesco
Xvtn (2024-03-19 14:57:40+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great to me - no complaints! Thanks for your contribution to the map.
ddropinski (2024-03-19 15:43:23+00:00): Thank you, Xvtn!
Metzor (2024-03-18 07:12:04+00:00): Hi dpaschich,

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering and happy mapping!
Metzor
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-17 23:20:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11739763456

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
luc3k (2024-03-18 06:42:29+00:00): Dziękuję za rady, nazwa usunięta
NorthCrab (2024-03-18 10:42:44+00:00): Dziękuję :-) Jest git!
eggie (2024-03-18 06:33:20+00:00): Dag mjeeloo  Svp niet nogmaals adressen toekennen aan gebouwomtrekken. We werken in Nederland met adresnodes.

MVG
eggie
MarcoR (2024-03-21 14:11:24+00:00): Ciao e benvenuti su OpenStreetMap,

nel caso di numeri di telefono per WhatsApp, puoi usare la chiave contact:whatsapp al posto di phone (vedi la wiki per maggiori info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:*)

Buon mapping,
Marco
rskedgell (2024-03-18 08:29:41+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and many thanks for adding these paths.

If it is of any interest or use to you, there is a resource with additional information on public rights of way (PRoW) in this area.
https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/progress/essex/castle-point/canvey/
garybikes (2024-04-14 14:20:32+00:00): Heyo, I edited this a while back and I wasn't entirely sure how to express what's happening here. As far as I can tell it's less of a ford and more of a flooded cycleway. "ford" to me implies a stream crossing which this is not -- it looks to me like the stream used to be redirected adjacent to / underneath the cycleway, but eventually overflowed and now covers the cycleway (which is why the cycleway now detours by the train tracks). What do you think of maybe removing the ford and adding tunnel=flooded to the cycleway?
ExpresswayDave (2024-04-14 23:40:33+00:00): I need to get the photographic evidence that supports this, but in a word: no. The reason why is that the stream doesn't go underneath the cycleway, but instead goes parallel to the now-abandoned section of cycleway in the same culvert. The cycleway then crosses the stream via what I mapped as a ford (there's no bridge, it just goes right into the stream, hence why I mapped it as a ford) to continue south as mapped. I mapped the abandoned section of cycleway as such, which is why it doesn't show up in OSM's rendering, but does show up in editors like JOSM. That's also why I mapped the practical altenate route as "Greenbelt Bikeway (detour)."

I documented this in my user diary entry entitlted "Greenbelt Bikeway Edits" on 11 April 2020, which you can find here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ExpresswayDave/diary/392694
garybikes (2024-04-15 00:11:50+00:00): Went over and re-checked and learned something new. The flooding on the cycleway is intermittent and depends on the water level of the stream. At present, the cycleway is clear all the way up to the sourthern mouth of the tunnel and then becomes blocked with dirt. Last time I checked (when I made my edits, a few months ago), the water level was over the cycleway. I've got photographs, but I'm not sure what the best way to share them is. So, in conclusion I think you've gotten it right -- the only change needed would be marking the flooded tunnel and ford as intermittent. If that sounds appropriate to you then I'm happy to figure out the best tags to do that.
ExpresswayDave (2024-04-16 22:27:08+00:00): Funny you should say that, because I just checked it out myself today with my body cam recording and mounted to the handlebars of my bike, and after seeing the water level below that of the cycleway and that it was passing under via a couple of large pipes that could be considered a mini-culvert I'm ready to concede that you were correct and that I was wrong! A ford is generally built (or is naturally-occuring) such that the water is flowing across the way all the time, but here it looks like the Champaign Parks District at least attempted to have the cycleway cross above the water level, even though it doesn't take much more flow for it to rise above the level of the cycleway and turn it into a ford. Which explains why when I first checked it out back in 2020 and then again sometime later the water was flowing over the cycleway.

It's too bad OSM doesn't have a way to upload photographs as I could get stills from my video and upload them and along with your photographs we could compare notes. I suppose I could set up a (temporary) web server for the purpose but I'm not sure I'm willing to go that far.

Bottom line: if you want to change it to be temporarily flooded from a ford, go ahead.
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-22 16:42:21+00:00): Здравствуйте.

Такие проезды обозначаются highway=service ("служебная дорога" в редакторе iD).
gurglypipe (2024-04-05 09:35:09+00:00): For anyone looking at this in future, the discussion about it is on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148228217 (which also links to the Talk-GB threads).

I object to my changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148762569) being described as “removing valid data”. It changed the tagging from something which was discussed on Talk-GB (which was not mentioned or linked to in your original change) to something which is documented on the wiki. Both of those are valid taggings. The changeset did not _remove_ any data.
robertmichaelw (2024-03-18 00:40:17+00:00): i live here
eggie (2024-03-18 06:30:14+00:00): Dag mjeeloo  Je verwijderde de description=grafheuvels. Waarom? 
MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-18 01:40:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/415454276
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/415454312

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
michalgwo (2024-03-18 02:40:19+00:00): poprawione
NorthCrab (2024-03-18 10:42:57+00:00): Dzięki :D !
Josef73 (2025-01-27 17:29:29+00:00): Hat die Mezgerei immernoch zu?
Xvtn (2024-03-19 14:56:25+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great to me, no complaints! Local knowledge/in-person observations are super valuable for situations like this.
Thanks for your contributions!
MxxCon (2024-03-20 15:25:53+00:00): Every single streetlight you added in this changeset has wrong lamp_mount= tag value. Please correct them. 👍
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148795710
IraGersh (2024-03-20 15:53:23+00:00): What do you suggest? straight_mast?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dstreet_lamp
does not describe ground.

And these are not masts.
MxxCon (2024-03-20 15:57:48+00:00): Well, I don't know what kind of lights they are so I can't tell you what tags to use, but I most definitely know that "lamppost" is not a valid value.
And "lampposthttps://www.mapillary.com/app/user/robinzyxhttps://www.mapillary.com/app/user/robinzyxhttps://www.mapillary.com/app/user/robinzyxhttps://www.mapillary.com/app/user/robinzyx" is not a valid value either.
IraGersh (2024-03-20 16:01:34+00:00): Ok.  that last one was a paste error.  Will fix all much later.  Thanks.  They are the standard parks black lamp posts.
MxxCon (2024-03-20 16:05:31+00:00): Then "straight_mast" or "bent_mast" sounds suitable for whatever shape they are.
IraGersh (2024-03-21 02:20:53+00:00): Values of mount in ID
bent_mast
straight_mast
pole
high_mast
wall
angled_mast
susbended
mast
lamppost
ground
cantilever_mast
90
ceiling
tbd

Then I found a link that doesn't list many either but the best match would be straight_mast.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lamp_mount
I find it very odd that so many choices are given but there is no documentation of what the things are. Is it possible one semi-colons different things together?  It is a lamppost after all. Anyway I'll deal with this tomorrow.  I have to get some sleep.
MxxCon (2024-03-21 02:32:36+00:00): What iD shows are just commonly used values. Many of those values can be wrong, such as "tbd" and "90".
Ultimately, you can use any value you want, even "Iras_favorite_lamppost", but no data consumer will know what it is and know how to handle it so it'll be just ignored. So what's the point of putting all this effort if your effort gets thrown out.
"Lamppost" is a plain American English terminology. But as you've seen, OSM uses British English and also certain industry-specific terminology. So words we use in everyday life might be be the same as what's used in OSM.
Lamppost is just a generic word. Is it straight? is it bent? Is it split? Is it double? That's why we have those predefined values that describe different types.
IraGersh (2024-03-22 03:24:46+00:00): Thanks for the explanation.  Changed them to straight_mast.  
Will create script to look for more.
I feel like what you said should be in the wiki.
MxxCon (2024-03-22 03:46:03+00:00): Which part should be in the wiki?
If you want to find more mistagged features you could use overpass-turbo, which gives you SQL-like interface to get data out of OSM.
Or you could use external tools like Osmose or in iD and RapiD open "Map Data" side panel and turn on Osmose, ImproveOSM and KeepRight validators. (but be careful about fixing some of those problems 😉)
IraGersh (2024-03-22 03:55:17+00:00): I was going to use overpass-turbo to find other nodes that have lamp_mount=lamppost.

I would like to use "What iD shows are commonly used values. Many of those values can be wrong,"

This might help explain why the list of tags in a wiki is so much shorter than those that seem available in iD.

Going forward I'm not touching anything that might affect a router unless it involves adding something.

While I believe OSM would be generally helpful, most have never heard of it, but its still used in popular products like CityMapper.

That said, anything I tag, I'll run though one of the external tools you mention.
laznik (2025-08-06 19:08:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1263614434/history#map=17/48.386151/18.980395

Myslim, ze ten "disused" tag tu nie je  vhodny. (vid https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused). Ja tam vidim len les, pripadne kroviny a tak by to malo byt aj otagovane.
macdale (2025-08-06 22:49:44+00:00): Ano, dakujem za upozornenie. Takto som to znacoval na zaciatku. Medzicasom som nasiel mapovo korektnejsie oznacenie. Teraz by to malo byt v poriadku.
zawilk (2024-03-18 03:39:52+00:00): Correction: I updated the feature type for the Victoria Townsite
Metzor (2024-03-19 07:07:10+00:00): Hey CreCrePL,

Brouter suspects complained about one of your turn restrictions:
https://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=18/48.07749/8.37116/standard&lonlats=8.370638,48.077283;8.371893,48.077427&profile=car-eco

You blocked a major road so I quickly fixed that:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/17355307

Have a nice day and happy mapping
Metzor
Matyáš Richter (2024-03-18 04:55:03+00:00): https://www.dtnews24.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=536140
trial (2024-03-18 19:32:02+00:00): This modification doesn't seem to be quite right: the building exists on the French Land registry and visible on PCRS raster and  Ortho HR IGN, just a few meters North. Nothing again adding the missing building, but please with the right extent and the right definition (wall=no is valid for the moved building, not for the newly created one, mind the color on the Land Registry).
Vubhar (2024-03-19 13:16:35+00:00): Thanks for the feedback trial. I moved the polygon to map building on North side and I also created new buildings using the recommended PCRS raster Imagery.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-06-27 00:43:07+00:00): Why did you add a duplicate way?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148798788
trial (2024-03-18 19:21:11+00:00): In this area, you can enjoy
trial (2024-03-18 19:21:35+00:00): a more accurate orthoimagery, PCRS raster
Vubhar (2024-03-19 13:14:39+00:00):  Thanks for the feedback. I aligned the data according to PCRS raster Imagery. Happy mapping.
silversurfer83 (2024-03-18 16:23:05+00:00): Hi there :)

When POIs change (e.g. "close") I believe it to be better to use the lifecycle prefixes as described here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148799245
Kookykooky (2024-03-18 16:51:45+00:00): I also use the tag disused, sometimes, maybe this tag will be better here.
Thank you for your note :)
goodidea (2024-05-04 17:23:55+00:00): Hi ... kleine Anmerkung bzw. Bitte: wenn man einen shop o. restaurant o.Ä. auf disused: setzt (wie hier das Vapiano), muss man nicht Tags wie level oder wheelchair entfernen, denn daran ändert sich i.d.R. ja nichts. Sonst ist das erst mal ein Verlust an Information und jemand muss das später nochmal  taggen = unnötig ...  Außerdem macht ein old_name oft Sinn, finde ich zumindest ... Danke und Grüße!
euroPathfinder (2024-05-04 18:54:24+00:00): Hi goodidea,
Guter Hinweis! Ja da stimme ich Dir absolut, diese Infos bleiben ja auch bei geschlossenem Lokal noch gleich. Ich ergänze nochmal die Infos, ich weiß nicht was mich in dem Moment dazu bewegt hat die Tags zu löschen, normalerweise lösche ich eigentlich nur Tags wie Name, Öffnungszeiten oder Bezahlarten. Oh und den Tag old_name habe ich bisher fast nie benutzt. Ich kann schon verstehen warum er sinnvoll sein kann, finde es aber in erster Linie wichtig dass die Historie eines Ortes erhalten bleibt.

Viele Grüße
euroPathfinder (2024-05-04 18:58:57+00:00): Oh ich sehe Du hast schon alles ergänzt, danke Dir!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-03 09:28:48+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11740437270/history has shop = tortilleria that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=tortilleria ? Should it be shop=tortilla proposed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:shop=tortilla ?

Is it amenity=fast_food or amenity=restaurant by any chance? Or are they selling pieces not ready to eat? Or ingredients? Maybe some https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine would be a good idea?
ZinaidaZ (2024-03-18 15:03:42+00:00): Добрый день. В этом доме действительно всего 39 квартир?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148800277
DD1GJ (2024-03-18 07:35:37+00:00): Hallo FabriceWe, willkommen bei OSM. Du hast hier kommentarlos die Filiale der Volksbank zum Standort der Sparkasse geschoben. War dies so beabsichtigt?

Viele Grüße, Joachim
FabriceWe (2024-03-18 07:42:17+00:00): Hallo Joachim, 
Die Volksbank gibt es dort nicht mehr und ist nun einen Gemeinschaft mit der Kreissparkasse.

Grüße
DD1GJ (2024-03-18 08:10:09+00:00): Vielen Dank. Falls Go Map Änderungssatzkommentare unterstützt, wären diese sehr hilfreich für die Qualitätssicherung.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
VictorIE (2024-12-02 19:42:24+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232285674/

Would you know what the street names are here?
michael60634 (2024-03-18 10:27:22+00:00): Rogue editor?
aixbrick (2024-03-18 13:23:40+00:00): Hallo,
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1263647817: Bitte nicht alle möglichen access-Werte setzen, wenn diese Standard sind. Was ist dort beschildert?
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18644422: Gleiche Frage wie oben, da sich "traffic_sign=DE:260,1026-36" und "hgv=destination" widersprechen. Hilfreich fürs korrekte Tagging ist https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/.
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/673558035: Zwar anderes Changeset, aber trotzdem der Hinweis, dass bei Kreisverkehren kein "name" eingetragen wird, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Kartierung -> letzter Punkt.
Gruß
SRA_A62_GeoService_1 (2024-03-18 14:24:40+00:00): Hallo,
das mit dem Kreisverkehr war mir nicht bewusst, da er ja komplett auf "Op d`r Scheet" liegt, jetzt weiß ich bescheid, danke.
1263647817:
https://www.google.com/maps/@50.8327281,6.0919029,3a,75y,63.99h,85.44t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sLZn5Un8MSd1NmPCNmfSDCw!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DLZn5Un8MSd1NmPCNmfSDCw%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D63.003216%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu

18644422:
https://www.google.com/maps/@50.8331963,6.0926891,3a,75y,40.59h,68.24t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sDV0pxU1QpBOngsSMTuKQrQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu
Die Leute bis zur 22 sollen ja auch noch zu Ihren Häusern kommen.

hgv wollte ich entfernen, schien mir durch die Lappen gegangen zu sein.
Soll ich das so machen?
aixbrick (2024-03-18 14:44:59+00:00): Ich hoffe mal, dass StreetView nur zur Erklärung gedacht ist und nicht als Quelle der Eintragungen. ;-)
Von https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1263647817 alle access-Tags (access, bicycle, foot usw.) entfernen, weil es keine Beschränkungen gibt.
Von https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18644422 auch alles entfernen, außer "motor_vehicle=agricultural", weil das die einzige ausgeschilderte Beschränkung ist.
SRA_A62_GeoService_1 (2024-03-19 06:05:44+00:00): Hallo,
natürlich habe ich Streetview nur als Mittel genutz um dir die Situation vor Ort zu zeigen. Wie im Änderungssatz Beschrieben: " vor Ort sah es anders ".
Danke dann werde ich das so noch umsetzen.
aixbrick (2024-03-19 07:02:10+00:00): Danke.
Bitte auch das "access=agricultural" löschen, denn das würde bedeuten, dass der Weg nur zu landwirtschaftlichen Zwecken genutzt werden darf - über alle Fortbewegungsmittel hinweg, also auch Fußgänger, Radfahrer...
nevw (2024-03-19 05:38:05+00:00): Hi, osmi alerted on this edit...
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.08823&lat=-27.58705&zoom=18
Carnildo (2024-03-18 19:53:28+00:00): Changeset has been reverted.
ppnplus (2024-03-19 08:45:16+00:00): ขอบคุณที่เพิ่มสถานที่นะครับ ผมได้แก้ไขประเภทสถานที่ให้ถูกต้องและเพิ่มข้อมูลที่ผมเจอเรียบร้อย สามารถตรวจสอบข้อมูลที่ผมเพิ่มได้นะครับ

อาสาสมัครดูแลแผนที่
Carnildo (2024-03-18 19:53:39+00:00): Changeset has been reverted.
Carnildo (2024-03-18 19:53:44+00:00): Changeset has been reverted.
Carnildo (2024-03-18 19:53:48+00:00): Changeset has been reverted.
Carnildo (2024-03-18 19:54:01+00:00): Changeset has been reverted.
Glassman (2024-03-19 15:23:45+00:00): #TIP: Streetnames are spelled out in OSM - the reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating.
DJPurpleHaze (2024-03-20 09:08:45+00:00): Hi, thank you for letting me know, I appreciate that. Now just so I'm clear I should've listed the streetname as:

"South 38th Street" instead of "S 38th St"?

Also, am I able to correct it or is it too late?
Glassman (2024-03-20 14:38:56+00:00): Yes - the street should be South 38th Street. One of the nice things about OSM is that you can update features anytime.
Carnildo (2024-03-18 19:54:06+00:00): Changeset has been reverted.
Carnildo (2024-03-18 19:54:16+00:00): Changeset has been reverted.
DD1GJ (2024-03-18 08:31:14+00:00): Revert, psv=yes ist bereits vorhanden. Was war das Ziel der technisch falschen  Änderung?
MichaelMcZiegler (2024-03-18 08:36:27+00:00): Das Ziel war Linienbusse auf Leerfahrten die durchfahrt zu ermöglichen.
DD1GJ (2024-03-18 08:43:11+00:00): Ist eigentlich schon seit Jahren möglich. Falls es Probleme mit einer bestimmten Anwendung gibt, dann liegt das Problem dort und nicht bei OSM. Vielleicht betrachtet diese Leerfahrten durch eine Fußgängerzone als unzulässig.
MichaelMcZiegler (2024-03-18 08:52:07+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung, dann werden wir das prüfen.
Eganatha (2024-03-26 13:03:03+00:00): English: Your contribution is greatly appreciated, but it needs a few refinements to meet the OpenStreetMap's Editing Standards and Conventions. If you had any questions, please reply to this comments.

Indonesia: Kontribusi anda sangatlah kita apresiasi, tetapi dibutuhkan sedikit perbaikan untuk memenuhi syarat Standar dan Konvensi Penyuntingan OpenStreetMap. Jika anda perlu pertanyaan, silahkan balas komentar ini.
marczoutendijk (2024-03-20 08:08:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15849
habi (2024-03-18 08:08:30+00:00): Falscher Changeset-Kommentar: Ich habe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4156261 korrigert, und den Standplatz in "only permanent" camping und "privat" umgewandelt.
Carnildo (2024-03-18 19:54:21+00:00): Changeset has been reverted.
Carnildo (2024-03-18 19:54:32+00:00): Changeset has been reverted.
Carnildo (2024-03-18 19:46:28+00:00): No, these areas are cemeteries.
Carnildo (2024-03-18 19:55:39+00:00): I've reverted your recent changes.  Cemeteries, forests, meadows, and nature reserves are not the sort of thing that OSM considers a park.
MaciekMma (2024-03-18 09:29:25+00:00): fajne info. dzieki
totera (2024-06-08 22:31:54+00:00): Potresti essere più accorto quando mappi posti che non conosci? Sono più di quattro anni che è stato costruito un ampio marciapiede rialzato sul sagrato della chiesa di Sant'Agostino ed è stato conseguentemente deviato il percorso che i veicoli devono seguire.
ross-map (2024-06-09 17:13:13+00:00): Buonasera Totera
Cortesemente gradirei un atteggiamento più rilassato nel tuo modo di esprimerti che trovo un po' aggressivo.  
Ormai è passato qualche tempo e sinceramente non ricordo cosa ho modificato nel sagrato della chiesa di Sant'Agostino, in quanto l'intervento che ho fatto ad Ascoli è stato di creare la relazione del Grande Anello dei borghi Ascolani, che però vedo che non passa in fronte alla chiesa...
Quindi se involontariamente ho modificato/creato qualcosa di errato me ne scuso e mi fa piacere che hai provveduto a modificare.
Ciao e buona mappatura 
R