piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Linda0815 (2025-04-11 20:44:50+00:00): Hallo Joachim,

Danke für deine Nachricht.
Ich werde mich wohl noch etwas in die tracktypen einlesen müssen. Ich hätte gerne den Typ "undefiniert" verwendet und dachte das war "track" ohne nähere Bestimmung.
Wenn man Karten mit open streetmap Datengrundlage verwendet, wie die Wanderreitkarte, gibt es darauf unbestimmte tracks, welchen Typ muss ich hierfür verwenden?

Bzgl der eingezeichneten Wege. Das sind Wege die von mir, und auch anderen Sportlern verwendet werden. Als Grundlage hat mir ein GPS track von mir gedient. Strava heatmap wäre aber auch möglich.

Die Problematik an dem bicycle=no ist, dass dieses Attribut bei kaum einem Weg unter 2m gesetzt ist. Außer bei ein paar wenigen. 
Diese Inkonsistenz ist mühsam. 
An diesem Weg steht kein explizites verboten Schild. In Naturschutzgebieten in denen das Radfahren nochmals explizit verboten ist, finde ich war Attribut hilfreich. 
An anderen Wegen mühsam, da auch Fahrradnavis und Komoot open streetmap verwendet und dann kein routing über diese Strecke möglich ist.
Über Sinnhaftigkeit der 2m Regelung möchte ich hier nicht diskutieren nur darauf hinweisen, dass das tatsächliche Nutzungsverhalten diese Regelung nicht beachtet.
Viele Pfade sind außerdem auch mit einer mtb scale versehen. Auch da, entweder alle bezeichnen, oder keinen... wäre mein Vorschlag. 
Ich freue mich immer, wenn ich in fremden Regionen unterwegs bin und schöne Strecken finde. Dafür nutze ich die digitalen Karten. Es wäre schön Fremde würden sich in meiner Region ebenso gut zu Recht finden.

Gibt es ein cheatsheet für die Anlage von Wegen mit richtigem Typ, Oberflächen,... ? Das wäre super. 
Gruß Linda
Lezurex (2025-04-11 12:22:32+00:00): Hallo skl1,

Bitte bei solchen Dingen eine Note erstellen. In OpenStreetMap haben wir ein spezifisches Tagging-Schema für geschlossene POIs, damit es jeder Datenkonsument versteht und entsprechend auswertet (bspw. dass es auf der Karte nicht mehr als Restaurant auftaucht).

LG Lezurex
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2025-04-12 08:36:46+00:00): Hi, 
highway=footway should be avoided.

highway=path or highway=cycleway are correct

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-cycleways-in-estonia/104894
yrtimiD (2025-04-13 16:12:06+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM.

You deleted here node created by other contributor without explaining the reason. At least this is not nice. 
So, could you, please, elaborate why?
THL_1 (2025-04-13 16:43:34+00:00): Redundancy, label was overpowering the rest of the landscape
yrtimiD (2025-04-13 18:37:55+00:00): Redundancy? Label? That's not the reason for deleting it!
This is called "tagging for renderer" and it's highly not recommended.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

I recommend to revert this removal.
SafwatHalaby (2025-04-20 08:22:48+00:00): Reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165181796
Đuro Jiří (2025-07-13 21:37:20+00:00): Ciao Paolo pn, perché hai aggiunto su parking_aisle ford=yes?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ford?uselang=hr
Paolo pn (2025-07-14 08:42:10+00:00): Ciao, è un errore di mappatura, ho appena rimosso la chiave. Grazie per la segnalazione.
Gregory Peony (2025-04-12 21:02:48+00:00): These residential areas are not valid; there aren't enough buildings in close proximity and this is an agricultural area. This also means the the tagging of residential highways is incorrect. In an agricultural area such as this they are likely tracks or paths, and maybe unclassified. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164810838
NieWnen (2025-04-11 14:49:08+00:00): Source?
s777n (2025-04-14 20:43:49+00:00): Здравствуйте. Имя предназнчено для собственных имен. Например "Александровский дворец" или "Магнит". А вот местные названия, номера домов или типы объектов например "Продуктовый" или "Магазин" добавлять не нужно. Подробнее: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия
fortera_au (2025-04-11 12:04:43+00:00): Hi there,

You've got a highway=track crossing a barrier=fence, is there a gate there or something that could be mapped to show that it's possible to go through?

Also, can you please be a bit more descriptive than "added stuff" in your changeset comments, it's good to explain at a basic level what your changeset does.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
yelisey90 (2025-04-11 13:24:16+00:00): partly reverted: the building outline is drawn from survey

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164816244
camirx (2025-04-11 11:51:36+00:00): Haus 4 ist laut Stadtplan der Stadt Wuppertal die folgende Anschrift:

Wiescher Str. 11b, 42277 Wuppertal

Weitere Informationen unter Eingabe der Adresse beim Stadtplan: https://www.wuppertal.de/microsite/geoportal/topicmaps/contentseiten/online-stadtplan.php
camirx (2025-04-11 11:54:34+00:00): Das Gebäude ist laut Stadtplan der Stadt Wuppertal die folgende Anschrift:

Wiescher Str. 11a, 42277 Wuppertal

Weitere Informationen unter Eingabe der Adresse beim Stadtplan: https://www.wuppertal.de/microsite/geoportal/topicmaps/contentseiten/online-stadtplan.php
motogs (2025-04-26 16:18:31+00:00): The spellings of 2 stops corrected in changeset 165472874 following survey and photos
SomeoneElse (2025-04-27 13:20:48+00:00): Thanks!
Baloo Uriza (2025-07-28 14:04:03+00:00): Available street level imagery shows no such restriction, though it is older.  Could you please provide the updated imagery?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164812556
sbedwal_Lyft (2025-07-31 04:30:04+00:00): Hi Baloo Uriza,

My name is Santosh, and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for your comment.
Our edit was based on recent street-level data from August 2024, which shows a U-turn sign present before the intersection. 
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SuOdgRZVzlSZacVucwBkK4o7a-E4cYs1/view?usp=sharing
If you have any more up-to-date information regarding this restriction, please feel free to update it accordingly.

Best regards,
Santosh
eggie (2025-04-12 19:03:36+00:00): Dag C Batenburg Wat bedoel je met 	maxweight =40000 ?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxweight

MVG
eggie
C Batenburg (2025-04-12 20:37:58+00:00): Oeps. Gelijk aangepast naar 40T. Dat was de bedoeling. Binnen de aanpassingen in LiveNAV (jouw ondertussen wel bekend) worden beperkingen in KG aangegeven. Vandaar de foutieve input gegeven denk ik.
eggie (2025-04-12 20:43:45+00:00): :)
MxxCon (2025-04-14 20:18:24+00:00): Hello.
Is the oasis cafe just a business on the ground floor or does it take up the whole building?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164813373
Piagno (2025-04-12 06:04:09+00:00): danke für das markieren. Das nächste mal gerne noch die entsprechende Notiz schliessen :)
Lezurex (2025-04-12 07:20:25+00:00): Ah, die habe ich gar nicht gesehen, danke.
Piagno (2025-04-12 10:21:14+00:00): Auch gut. Da du es eine stunde nach dem eröffnen der Notiz gemacht hattest, dachte ich, dass es einen Zusammenhang mit der Notiz hat.
Lezurex (2025-04-12 10:23:31+00:00): Ich hatte eben dieses Changeset hier reviewed und habs basierend darauf entsprechend angepasst. Die Note ging an mir vorbei haha
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164810640
Piagno (2025-04-12 11:21:08+00:00): Ah ja handyapps sind immer frickelig zum richtig taggen
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-11 16:54:56+00:00): thanks for a fix!
user_5359 (2025-04-12 08:12:32+00:00): Hello! What is the mean of the tag CBTC = UAIBIT?
eggie (2025-04-11 15:32:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Met welk doel heb je het aangepast?
Het zijn toch geen doorgaande wegen? 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
borishag (2025-04-14 10:49:56+00:00): @Joost Schouppe en @Dentonny Ook hier waarom landnaam en provincie vermelden als het automatisch gegenereerd wordt?
bxl-forever (2025-08-28 21:41:46+00:00): I agree with you, @borishag.  Those tags are not necessary.  This changeset is a mistake and has been reverted now.

That said, "addr:city" and "addr:postcode" should also be deleted all across Belgium, because we have zones covering the country to provide this information much more reliably.

When cleaning up data, I currently make an exception for AS Watson shops because I understand that you regularly query OSM data and expect to find city name and postcode directly on the nodes instead of doing geoqueries.  It would be nice if you could find a way to improve this in the future.
borishag (2025-09-01 10:59:07+00:00): @bxl-forever, Het 'format' van alle ASW winkels (ca 1.700) wordt nu gebruikt in NL/BE/LU. In de toekomst zullen ook de filialen van adere Europese merken van ASW onder dit format geplaatst worden. In de andere landen waar we actief zijn hebben we geen problemen met het vermelden van postcode en stad.
eggie (2025-04-11 15:33:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Tip   oneway=no hoef je niet te taggen op reguliere wegen. Dat is default.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-26 09:56:36+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173786157
eggie (2025-04-11 15:36:32+00:00): Wanneer er geen bobording staat kun je beter highway=path gebruiken. Dat routeert ook per default voor fietsers.

Een highway=footway is alleen voor wandelaars en heeft vaak een G7 bord vooraan. 
MVG
eggie
BCNorwich (2025-04-11 13:48:34+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed this school building outline as it duplicates an existing outline. I put your new tags onto the existing outline.

Regards Bernard.
grelus (2025-07-13 20:09:56+00:00): dlaczego zmiana na greenfield? przecież to są tereny zalewowe a nie przyszłe inwestycyjne
cyganka (2025-07-15 05:40:31+00:00): Gmina nadaje nazwy nowym ulicom i nowe adresy, powstaje infrastruktura techniczna dla przyszłej zabudowy.
citrula (2025-04-11 19:28:31+00:00): Is the whole road called Gage Road, or just the east-west part? 

You drew a new highway over the top of the existing one. This is not correct - let me know if you need help fixing this.
citrula (2025-04-11 20:01:00+00:00): I fixed it - please confirm that it's correct, thanks :)
YanethCastillo (2025-04-12 00:09:15+00:00): that is correct thank you!
Qotola (2025-04-11 14:03:14+00:00): Hi yelisey90. Here is a detailed plan of this building, which is clearly different: https://biota.ge/project/project_one/floor/1
yelisey90 (2025-04-12 08:36:16+00:00): Ooops! I've misidentified the photo that I had taken, it was actually of თეთრი კვადრატი ჯიქიაზე nearby.
The present building is still invisible from over the fence. I've simplified its geometry and removed levels number for now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164845232
Thanks for sticking to the issue!
mewhenthe (2025-04-11 18:55:13+00:00): Thanks for the edits on the toll roads, however I have concerns regarding this edit.

1. I personally don't agree with the neighboring roads of the toll road being reclassified as a "secondary road".
It would likely be better for them to be primary roads as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=primary#International_equivalence

2a. What are the sources of this edit? As far as I'm aware, the imagery you used is not available in the area you mapped, and you have no sources you put in yourself.

2b. Why did you delete ways? Again, the imagery doesn't appear to be served in the area you mapped, and is likely outdated if it was available. How did you know that these didn't exist?

3. I find it suspicious that the roads you've deleted are the same roads that aren't mapped on Google Maps. Could be coincidence, but I don't find it likely.
mewhenthe (2025-04-12 02:12:20+00:00): I have just sent a PM to the original editor through OSM.
mewhenthe (2025-04-14 14:39:15+00:00): While I am not saying that you are evading questions/comments intentionally, you seem to have a tendency of not responding to them.

There are 14 other changesets that have at least one comment on them, some of which being:
https://www.osm.org/changeset/139918149 - Asks for sources, sees you deleting and recreating ways
https://www.osm.org/changeset/131510629 - Comments on making sure you add proper sources
https://www.osm.org/changeset/144793256 - Was reverted due to the roads not being open yet, along with 35 ignored iD editor warnings
https://www.osm.org/changeset/154447260 - Was reverted similar to c144793256, with 23 ignored iD warnings.
https://www.osm.org/changeset/107987780 - This changeset was advised that it caused an issue with a relation
A full list of comments on changesets you made can be found at https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=6802016

You have acknowledged and/or responded to none of these and have continued to make errors that the iD editor and contributors were attempting to alert you of.

I don't know if you don't receive messages from OSM via email, or if you know this feature even exists. I have attempted to get in contact with you directly through OSM's own platform, yet you are still yet to respond 72+ hours later.

I'm not trying to discourage you from mapping on OSM, it's a service you are aiding by updating things! However I find your edits to be low quality, not properly reviewed, and not sourced well. Even basic sources such as "Survey" or "Aerial Imagery" could negate some the comments, yet you appear to not being doing any of such to try and improve.
mewhenthe (2025-04-20 02:14:10+00:00): Edits partially reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165175635
Cameron Ford (2025-07-04 13:57:08+00:00): Editing Roads in North Austin that are recently completed.
PierZen (2025-04-12 13:49:07+00:00): merci de collaborer à OpenStreetMap.  Quelle est la source des noms que vous avez ajouté aux bâtiments ?  Et à ma connaissance, il n'y a pas de monastère à cet endroit. Il y en avait un à Shawinigan qui est maintenant fermé.
JeromeDuford (2025-04-12 14:07:27+00:00): Il s'agit du Duché de Bicolline, un site d'immersion médiéval/fantastique !
PierZen (2025-04-12 21:48:02+00:00): ok je n'avais pas vu le polygone englobant le site "Duché de Bicolline" !
Abubakar shamsudeen kana (2025-04-18 16:57:32+00:00): Well
Sébastien Pi (2025-12-20 15:48:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176556750/history
Sébastien Pi (2025-12-20 16:01:12+00:00): Oups. Bonjour Simon,

Je regarde cette note réactivée https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4977055

Il y a beaucou de B54. Je vois qu’on n’était pas très constant (mélange footway/path). Mathias a remis une homogénéité (path/bybcle=yes).

Ici, on est clairement pas dans https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian (une voiture ne peut pas passer).
Donc plus dans https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Aire_piétonne (footway + bicycle=yes et en théorie maxspeed, pas sûr que Geovelo utilise ce dernier :)).
C’est le sens du changement que tu avais fait à l’époque. Et je pense qu’il est un peu plus pertinant que path dans cette partie urbaine.

Tu en penses quoi ?
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-24 14:58:32+00:00): היי בנצי, גם כאן הוספת שם תיאורי! נא לקרוא את ההודעות האחרות שנשלחו לך.
Udarian (2025-04-12 00:49:31+00:00): whats the source for this
Baloo Uriza (2025-04-14 13:22:59+00:00): Ad copy has no place in OpenStreetMap.  Please don't include ad copy in the description or any other field.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164817598
Stem (2025-04-11 14:02:45+00:00): Le garage ne figure pas encore sur les cartes qui peuvent servir de source, les dimensions sont donc approximatives.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-04-12 00:27:41+00:00): Bir yolu (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/831753854) yanlışlıkla bina(building) şeklinde etiketlemişsiniz. Admin_level etiketini 6'dan 11'e değiştirmeniz de yanlış. Diğer değişiklikleeinizin doğru olduğuna, il sınırlarını doğru bir şekilde değiştirdiğinize emin misiniz? Emin değilseniz, yanlışlıkla yaptıysanız değişikliklerinizi geri alabilirim.
Mathias_ADAV (2025-06-06 13:48:00+00:00): Bonjour, on est sur un chemin type voie verte avec une réglementation (non adapté) d'aire piétonne qui n'interdis en rien l'usage du vélo, son usage et permis sur une aire piétonne sauf mention contraire https://www.fub.fr/velo-ville/amenagements/amenagements-types/aire-pietonne
Je rétablis donc bicycle designated
samuel_geovelo (2025-06-06 14:30:52+00:00): Bonjour Mathias, OSM cartographie le terrain, pas des volontés. En l’occurrence une voie piétonne n'est pas "dédiée" au vélo, mais "admise" aux cyclistes, comme précisé dans le document de la FUB. 
Pour bien faire, il faudrait même plutot cartographier un 
highway=pedestrian
motor_vehicule=no
traffic_sign=FR:B54
car il n'y a aucune interdiction, certe, mais aucune objectivation non plus du caractère cyclable, quand bien même le chemin serait "typé". Qu'en pensez vous ?
Mathias_ADAV (2025-06-06 14:55:24+00:00): Osm s’emploie justement à cartographier ce que l'on voit sur le terrain et ce que l'on voit c'est un chemin de type voie verte (on aurait pas cette discussion si le panneau était un C115) et non pas une aire piétonne qui est dédié aux places et rues d'hypercentre. Donc pour moi le highway = pedestrian n'est pas possible. Concernant la réglementation de l'aire piétonne, les cyclistes peuvent y circuler à allure modéré. Donc c'est autorisé, et bicycle = permissive indique que ce n'est pas exactement légale et que c'est au bon vouloir du propriétaire. Ce qui n'est pas le cas ici. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dpermissive bicycle = designated fonctionne et si on veut indiquer un maxpseed pour les véhicule à allure du pas (maxpseed = 5) alors pourquoi pas. mais c'est tout le problème que l'on à Valenciennes, les aménagements sont anciens et la réglementation pas toujours adapté.
StreetSurveyor (2025-04-15 01:21:53+00:00): I don't think this is a real street even though it shows in the GIS. Believe it's just an access road for Johnson Estates. I didn't see a sign when I ran there. Also, a quick G-Street view shows the mailboxes on the side all have high numbers indicating it's not a separate road and all the houses carry the numbers of the main road.
aduxas (2025-04-15 16:29:15+00:00): I did visit the street too and went all the way till the end.  It's definitely not a driveway, and looks exactly like a residential street (private).  Bristol zoning map shows it as a residential area with 40000 sq foot lots.  I agree the street address of the houses here is Poppasquash Road.  I will remove the name.  If it's not a real street, what would you call it?
UliFR (2025-04-11 14:27:12+00:00): used wrong source, correct: aerial images (Ortho 2024) and GPS
Константин Гам (2025-04-21 09:26:50+00:00): Как-то странный фикс, вы испортили статусы дорог расставленные по факту.
Без корректных статусов, легко заехать не туда, например на самокате на кад укатить...
Sébastien Pi (2025-12-21 12:56:58+00:00): Bonjour Samuel,

J’ai supprimé ton petit bout : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1376751316/history/1

cf. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4579372 confirmé par les photos de la rue
samuel_geovelo (2025-12-22 08:01:48+00:00): Salut Sebastien, ok pour la modif et merci pour le suivi !
Znaika (2025-04-11 19:15:38+00:00): Hi,
mit hw=service habe ich verstanden. Aber Zugang am Poller? Hier kommen keine Autos durch. Oder?
rempshaener (2025-04-11 21:10:32+00:00): Oh sorry, hatte ich noch schreiben wollen.

Komplett „richtig“ wäre
    access=no
    foot=yes
    bicycle=yes
    horse=yes
    mofa=yes
    moped=yes
Das
    motor_vehicle=no 
passt wegen mofa und moped nicht.
Deswegen spare ich mir Angaben, soll der Router doch selbst entscheiden

Viele Grüße
SomeoneElse (2025-04-11 14:55:44+00:00): See discussion  on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164484446 .
SomeoneElse (2025-04-11 14:55:35+00:00): See discussion  on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164484446 .
eggie (2025-04-11 15:51:33+00:00): Dag nieuwlaurens. Probeer wel verbindingen te maken met kruisende wegen. het zal anders niet routeren/
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway
  	3

MVG
eggie
IreuN (2025-04-11 14:44:40+00:00): Uprzejmie informuję, że nie przyjmuję żadnych reklamacji co do tego changesetu. A miasto to zapisuję jako najgorsze jakie napotkałem.

Jeśli widzisz błąd - popraw.
SomeoneElse (2025-04-11 14:55:07+00:00): See discussion  on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164484446 .
SomeoneElse (2025-04-11 14:55:27+00:00): See discussion  on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164484446 .
Dindia (2025-09-07 12:40:58+00:00): What is the sorce of name "Wadi de Muerte" ? I couldn't find any reference for it.
SomeoneElse (2025-04-11 14:55:21+00:00): See discussion  on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164484446 .
pyrog (2026-03-10 07:49:15+00:00): Bonjour Mathieu,

Fusionner les 2 ways du passage piéton à cassé la relation itinéraire.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1192335636

Je corrige.

Cordialement, 
Yves  - Groupe OSM PLein AIr
paulst_bb (2025-04-11 15:20:44+00:00): 30 kmh
Dimitar155 (2025-04-11 16:45:32+00:00): Днес минах покрай https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11554782954 и съм си записал същите часове,  но Mo-Su вместо Mo-Fr.
pavvv (2025-04-11 18:18:34+00:00): Dzięki za edycję, ale zmiany na Nowych Żernikach są błędne. Te przystanki nie są używane, dlatego są oznaczone jako disused:highway=bus_stop. https://osm.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
pavvv (2025-04-11 18:20:29+00:00): I przystanki–perony, obok drogi, powinny mieć tag highway=bus_stop, a te na jezdni już nie.
osm.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway=bus_stop
Dimitar155 (2025-04-11 16:02:44+00:00): Автокоректа е объркал оператора, освен ако грешката не е вярна :).
Boyan Alexiev (2025-04-11 17:47:58+00:00): Прав си! Благодаря за корекцията 😄
nmimn (2025-04-11 16:27:21+00:00): Ale ještě by to chtělo doplnit příjezdové cesty a určitě tam budou nějaká parkoviště.
Marek-M (2025-04-11 17:57:43+00:00): Cześć, po co dodajesz zbędne węzły na prawie prostych odcinkach dróg kolejowych? Do niczego nie jest to potrzebne a utrudnia to tylko edycje takich linii.
Michaall99 (2025-04-12 12:13:31+00:00): Cześć, przede wszystkim zależało mi na poprawieniu przebiegu torów przy dworcu. Tam od dawna był źle i krzywo narysowany peron, co wynikało z jeszcze bardziej krzywo narysowanych torów. Przy okazji, korzystając z dostępności BDOT'a, zmapowałem resztę torów w gminie. Fakt, niektóre z tych węzłów można uprościć, ale zdecydowanie nie wszystkie.
WindStream (2025-04-15 07:05:12+00:00): Здравствуйте
На основе каких данных вы меняете прохождение ВСМ в границах Екатеринбурга?
Kisa Q (2025-07-16 00:26:00+00:00): Извиняюсь за долгий ответ. В Екатеринбурге ВСМ не был размечен. Разметила на основании ответа РЖД и сайта Генплана Екатеринбурга Мирные Жители. РЖД пишут не внятно, поэтому пришлось звонить им напрямую, в управление СвЖД и в Челябинский минтранс. Они и сами не все знают между собой, что у них
WindStream (2025-07-16 07:37:02+00:00): >В Екатеринбурге ВСМ не был размечен

Да, потому что от Екатеринбург-Сортировочный до Шарташ будет, в том числе, переукладка существующих путей. 
Поэтому не зная точного прохождения путей не стал загромождать карту.  

Посмотрите на свежий ГенПлан на сайте
https://mnp.economy.gov.ru/geo/geomnp/viewapp/index.html
нужно через поиск по "Екатеринбург" выбрать Генплан до 2045 года и в нём слой "железнодорожные линии (за исключением железнодорожных линий необщего пользования) (лн)"
WindStream (2025-07-16 15:02:26+00:00): Правду знают проектировщики
https://uralgiprotrans.ru/store/13481/obekt-2/