piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2023-08-18 06:05:38+00:00): Hoi Hesso.. 

Netjes ingetekend!

Gebruikelijk is om langsliggende trottoirs op te nemen in de tagging van de hoofdrijbaan met sidewalk=left / right / both 
Dus niet apart intekenen. Het mag wel, want consensus is er niet.  Zorg dan wel voor voldoende oversteekmogelijkheden anders routeert het allemaal niet. Je zit gevangen op je trottoir.

Mijn advies zou zijn nog eens goed naar die trottoirs te kijken. 

Wanneer er een groenstrook tussen hoofdrijbaan en trottoir zit worden deze wel apart ingetekend.
Nogmaals .. fout is het niet, maar gebruikelijk ook niet. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk


https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140032286

MVG
eggie
HessoKaart (2023-08-18 09:39:44+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
Dankjewel voor de feedback. Ik heb de komende week niet/minder tijd om dit nog aan te passen naar een duidelijkere sidewalk mogelijkheid, maar zodra ik even de tijd heb om dit helemaal aan te passen zal ik het wat verduidelijken.

Mvg,
Hesso
eggie (2023-08-18 09:42:57+00:00): Top!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-17 22:00:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4870369868

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2023-08-18 05:00:13+00:00): Please don't add addresses in OSM...
I removed the address from the building_shape again.
Greetz,
eggie
Glassman (2023-08-19 22:26:39+00:00): #TIP: street names in OSM are spelled out - the reason is software has a hard time unabbreviating
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140033245
markbegbie (2025-01-13 08:03:36+00:00): Hi, you deleted the building tag from this way which meant it was not recognised as a feature on the map.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140033477
user_5359 (2023-09-13 06:36:47+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1199308564. What is the mean of the tag codigo_mun = 15238 ? Is this a ref number?
Leonardo Gutierrez (2025-12-08 16:57:22+00:00): Yes this is a ref number from Colombian number
WoodWoseWulf (2023-08-18 23:34:39+00:00): Hello,

There is already a tunnel in the stream mapped here. The tunnel appears to be more correct than a bridge.

Please only use the name tag for actual names. Other features can be mapped using correct tagging such as the following: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge
WoodWoseWulf (2023-08-18 23:30:57+00:00): Hi E20VIE,

Are you attempting to add a new construction area here? You had it mapped as a building named "construction" partially covering the existing building. I have removed this feature for now.
MxxCon (2023-08-22 02:59:23+00:00): Hello.
Where is this data coming from?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140033775
Waffle1434 (2023-08-22 04:56:10+00:00): Just adding min heights such that parts don't vertically overlap (based on the existing heights). Where one building part ends, another begins. Many buildings do parts this way.
MxxCon (2023-08-22 05:01:49+00:00): Implication of setting min_height is that there's nothing below that feature, which is obviously not the case..
Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:min_height
DressyPear4 (2023-08-18 10:10:27+00:00): Olá, park é um local de lazer, e não todo o bairro
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140033833
MxxCon (2023-08-22 03:04:04+00:00): Hello.
What is the point of creating building relations here when simple building:part=yes achieves the same results?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140033894
Waffle1434 (2023-08-22 08:02:30+00:00): Supposedly its the "correct" way to tag a building outline as unused for 3d rendering. Otherwise, the building parts are consumed by the extruded outline, negating the purpose of having building parts in the first place. A 3d renderer has no idea which building parts belong to unless there's a relation. 95% of NYC's buildings using parts don't do this though, so 3d rendering is a real broken mess.

"When a building has any building:part= areas, the building outline is not considered for 3D rendering."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings#Building_outlines
MxxCon (2023-08-23 05:37:56+00:00): Broken mess?🤨I don't know where you are seeing this.
NYC buildings look fine in F4, streets.gl, osmbuildings, mapbox. Some how more details, some have less. Some could be improved. But it's hardly "a real broken mess".

I think you are misunderstanding the statement you quoted.
Yes, if there's a way with building:part=yes exists within the perimeter of a building outline, building outline is not rendered. That's not broken. That's by design.
It is so that the whole building can be correctly and accurately represented by all the necessary building:part=yes ways.
SomeoneElse (2023-08-20 12:51:36+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/utilizzo-del-tag-highway-trunk-in-italia/101471/49
user_5359 (2023-08-18 04:58:13+00:00): Hello! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the street name, please?
ResistivKai (2023-08-18 06:23:33+00:00): Howdy! Changeset 140041038 added the streets for all labeled buildings. Thank you!!
aharvey (2026-03-29 23:54:51+00:00): hi, you've listed your source as knowledge, but your prior "Courtesy and Emergency moorings" changesets appear to have systematically added data from another source. These appear to align with Maritime NSW data at https://data.nsw.gov.au/data/dataset/2-maritime-nsw-public-mooring

Could you please clarify where the data you've been adding here was sourced from and your process?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines document the steps which must be taken to perform an import
WoodWoseWulf (2023-08-18 23:17:17+00:00): Hi Jacob,
Welcome to OSM. Please be aware that this is a public map. You should avoid adding personal information.
Udarian (2023-08-18 05:41:45+00:00): next time you commit can you please leave a more descriptive comment. "." doesn't really tell others what you did in a commit. for more information see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.
WoodWoseWulf (2023-08-18 23:28:01+00:00): Hi aerialeliz,

Welcome to OSM. Is this small park area called Echo Ridge Gazebo Park? It kind of just looks like a square of grass.
WoodWoseWulf (2023-08-18 23:12:48+00:00): Hi Jacob,
If you search for "pool" in the text box under "Select feature type" the option should be there. I'll fix this one for you.
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-18 04:39:08+00:00): Please use more detailed changeset comments.  What did you change and why?  "." tells me nothing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140036111
gscholz (2023-08-22 06:10:00+00:00): Hi evgeniyakz,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=76.84639&lat=43.18342&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140036396

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

May be you also like to have a look at other errors in this town, as some residential areas like "Құрамыс" have been destroyed by your activities as well:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16206580/history#map=16/43.1881/76.8475

Kind regards
Guido
evgeniyakz (2023-10-28 13:16:40+00:00): Границы были наложены на дроги , при правке улиц , произошло нарушение , извеняюсь , но надо же на улицах делать отношения а не накладывать линию на линию ?
gscholz (2023-10-29 07:57:10+00:00): You can use separate lines or use the streets only as well.
Guido
rapidassist (2023-09-14 19:31:13+00:00): Hello - I'm wondering why you added a few very small ways... like w1199328106
vorpalblade (2023-09-14 19:54:48+00:00): Not to pile on here, but I don't think US 50 goes south at Loma. Its been awhile since I did a drive through it using Mapillary (see https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1491045207904255 ), but I didn't see any US 50 signs.

If you live in the area, I would highly recommend uploading new/fresh imagery so that someone doesn't assume that a malicious actor was messing with the map. I live in Grand Junction, and I don't when I'll be driving through Loma and/or Mack again.

Anyway, just so you know, Mesa County GIS has allowed us to use their (much more) up to date imagery for tracing in OpenStreetMap. You can see it by clicking on the "Background Settings" button in iD (keyboard shortcut "b") and select "Mesa County GIS Valleywide 2022".

JOSM also has access to the 2022 (County wide) and 2020 (Grand Valley) aerial photos with the names starting as "Mesa County GIS".

Thanks for your contributions,
vorpalblade

P.S. the local GIS office is having what is known as a "mappy hour" on September 27th. See https://www.mesacounty.us/news/gis/gis-mappy-hour for details.
Xvtn (2023-12-14 19:56:33+00:00): Hello Vaasan and commenters! I'm going through changesets that have requested a review. Looking over this I'm thinking highway 139/50 going north from exit 15 should not be one-way. But I can't be sure I guess - Can any locals weigh in?
vorpalblade (2023-12-14 20:41:33+00:00): Yeah, it should _not_ be oneway. I'll fix it in a minute.
Xvtn (2023-12-14 21:20:09+00:00): Great - thanks!
LockOnGuy (2023-08-18 05:21:06+00:00): Hello ڕاستی, In this changeset you have deleted 15 manholes. example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6721742085/history, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6721742085/history Why did you remove them?        
I also see you changed the name of a roundabout way 890768441, what is your source for this? as there was 2 nodes on that roundabout, n10980156210 and n6909958685 that stated the name in Arabic, Kurdish, and English and they are different from the one used when you made the roundabout a new Kurdish only name. If those names on the nodes are local names, then please do not remove them entirely, it should be in loc_name instead.      
Regards.
LockOnGuy (2023-08-18 05:38:38+00:00): I also see that you deleted lots of manholes before, for example in changeset 130013231:    
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6723137085/history      
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6721742185/history      
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6790254785/history      
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6721742086/history      
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6721742186/history      
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6721742287/history      
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6724487386/history      
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6721742289/history       
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6698971389/history       
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6721742096/history      
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6721742095/history      
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6721742097/history        
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6721742098/history      
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6721742099/history      
etc..      
And in changeset 6721742093:          
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6721742093/history         
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6779123786/history      
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6779131287/history         
etc..       
And in changeset 129971335:            
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6721742092/history          
And https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6721742091/history       
...      
And many other changesets.      
Can you please explain why you keep deleting them?
LockOnGuy (2023-08-18 04:58:51+00:00): Hello ڕاستی, In this changeset, you removed the names from a way 229481943 and moved them to node 8395186468, this is OK, but moving English and Kurdish names only without the name:ar is not OK, by this you have removed the name:ar of that neighborhood entirely from OSM. Can you please restore it?     
I also see you have edited r6585775 in this changeset. You previously edited the name:ar from Arabic to kurdish then deleted the correct and vaild name:ar of that relation, can please restore it?    
Also, the name and name:ckb you are adding for streets are not matching, please match them and the alternative one should be in alt_name.   
Regards.
emersonveenstra (2023-08-19 17:52:32+00:00): Hi, looks like you accidentally incorrectly applied a lifecycle prefix here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11124233558/history

The prefix needs to go on the tag key, not the value. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix for more details.

Could you please fix this? Thanks!
MxxCon (2023-08-22 03:07:29+00:00): Hello.
Similar to the previous edit, what is the source of this data?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140038695
Udarian (2023-08-18 05:03:01+00:00): I typoed at the end of the message. there is still work needed in the area  though this commit deals with some of the most misaligned roads in the area.
Rodrigo Rega (2023-08-20 15:42:13+00:00): Hola. Antes de nada darte las gracias por tus ediciones en Lugo. Te escribo porque en este conjunto de cambios hubo algunas ediciones que creo que no son correctas. Te enumero las que he localizado: 1. Rotonda de Beingno Rivera (gasolinera repsol) se ha cambiado a "service" y "lanes=1", antes estaba como "secondary" y "lanes=2". Vía de servicio de Benigno rivera (enfrente gasolinera repsol) se ha puesto como "secondary" y "lanes=2", debería ser "service" y "lanes=1". 3. Se ha cambiado el nombre de "rúa da industria" a "rúa das comunicacións". 4. Se ha puesto la ahora "rúa das comunicacións" como rotonda. Espero que puedas revisarlo, un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140039111
MarcosdeE (2023-08-21 19:22:06+00:00): Hola! Muchas gracias por avisar. Ya me ha pasado anteriormente que el editor me ha dado problemas y me ha alterado campos que yo no estaba modificando. He corregido lo que has comentado en el último conjunto de cambios, añadiendo el viaje de vuelta del bus 1.2. Un saludo!
Rodrigo Rega (2023-08-22 20:52:32+00:00): Genial, gracias. Hace tiempo intenté ponerme a añadir alguna ruta de bus, pero se me hizo cuesta arriba (un coñazo) xd
silversurfer83 (2023-08-23 14:27:50+00:00): This is the third version of this store you added. I cleaned up, again. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140279356
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140039864
julcnx (2024-04-24 09:00:50+00:00): Hey, thank you for your contributions! I noticed you've marked some roads as 'living_street.' One tip for future edits: you should tag these as 'highway=residential' instead. This is because there aren't any rules in Thailand that specifically lower speed limits or give pedestrians priority in residential areas.
You can read more about this on the Thailand wiki. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Cheers
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Urban_and_Local_Road_wide_enough_for_motor_cars
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140039926
BCNorwich (2023-08-19 05:54:52+00:00): Hi, I've removed several duplicated building outlines that you added.

Regards Bernard.
gendy54 (2023-08-20 21:50:03+00:00): Bonjour,

Une petite aide pour le nommage des modifs: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
BCNorwich (2023-08-19 05:52:08+00:00): Hi, I've removed several duplicated highways in this area that you've inadvertently added.

Regards Bernard.
WalkingWiki (2023-12-04 09:24:45+00:00): Please don't do this again. Those details are there for a reason and are important. I spent hundreds of hours adding them and doing physical surveys of the area. Thank you for your understanding.
Bienson (2023-08-19 00:10:43+00:00): Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55139395 wurde dadurch gelöscht.
mbyte (2023-08-19 08:08:22+00:00): Hallo Bienson,
Danke für den Hinweis. Da habe ich die Daten falsch eingefügt. Ist wieder korrigiert.
Gruß mbyte
spughetti (2023-08-20 12:45:42+00:00): Hi dogpatchfoil, welcome to OpenStreetMap!

The description tag should not be used to advertise a business, I've thus removed the description from your business.

You can read more about the description tag here
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description

You can find my changeset here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140131042
WalkingWiki (2023-12-04 09:10:06+00:00): Please don't do this again. Those details are there for a reason and are important. I spent hundreds of hours adding them and doing physical surveys of the area. Thank you for your understanding.
这里没有鱼 (2023-08-18 07:08:33+00:00): 别猜。这里不是测试的地方。
GerdP (2023-08-20 05:13:22+00:00): Danke, war anscheinend schon zu müde.
Dawid2849 (2023-08-18 10:11:38+00:00): Dzięki za poprawkę! Adresy na stronie Geoportalu nie zgadzają się z tym, co jest na e-mapie...
eggie (2023-08-18 07:39:30+00:00): Dag I Schaap... Da's weer mooi actueel, maar je hebt wel ook met het verwijderen de adressen weggegooid en die zijn van belang om iets te vidnen bij een zoekslag.
Ook svp geen adresnodes veranderen, want dan komt een adres 2x voor en een ander adres is ook van de kaart verdwenen.
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140042761
eggie (2023-08-18 07:50:50+00:00): Kijk anders even hier welke nummers er op het pand horen.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Da+Vinciplein++goes&objectId=0664100000013844&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=49827.6405&geometry.y=390201.0885&zoomlevel=13.487643192203315&bijbehorendeAdressen=Pand

MVG
eggie
emersonveenstra (2023-08-19 17:47:32+00:00): Hi,

The "lanes" value in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1199361368 does not match the total number of lanes in the :forward, :backward, and :both_ways values. Could you please fix this? Thanks!
Maryna Makarava (2023-08-22 19:47:33+00:00): Hi! Thank you very much for this comment! I fixed it as soon as I watched your message 
 :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140244458
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140042862
LockOnGuy (2023-08-18 12:10:03+00:00): I have deleted this "city" you added. Please do not add fake cities.    
Regards.
GUFSZ (2023-08-18 08:01:06+00:00): Zur Ergänzung. Der Odenwaldclub hat vor ca. 25 Jahren das Netz entworfen, dies wurde dann an die kommunalen Träger übergeben. Daraus speist sich die verwaltungsinterne Bezeichnung. 
Wenn man aber den Odenwaldclub dazu befragt, haben die Antwortenden kein Wissen mehr von der damaligen Mitwirkung und zeigen sich verständlicherweise irritiert.
Als Freizeitfahrer habe ich bei einem meiner Fehlerberichte an die Verwaltungen angemerkt, die alte Routenführung einer Route wäre schöner gewesen. Die Verwaltungsangestellte wusste gar nichts von einer ehemaligen anderen Führung.
Was will ich damit sagen? Diese Routen haben eine lange Geschichte, die teilweise nicht erinnert wird und damit entstehen widersprüchliche Angaben, die man unter einen Hut bringen muss.
elgolfo (2024-01-12 14:02:42+00:00): Hey room6675, 

as you have added some description in the name tag again, I've corrected it and put your updated name tag in the description. 
In OSM putting descriptions into the name-tag is seen as tagging for the renderer (e.g. having a nice looking map somewhere).
Rules of thumb for the name tag are:
* when there is a sign then putting the content of the sign is right (in most of the cases). Otherwise it should go for the description. 
* is the value of the name tag something like ehemalig or former it is most likely also just a description

For the details have a look into the wiki[1]. 

I've fixed it in CS 146182265.

Cheers
Moritz
[1]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-18 07:50:18+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3069403769
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7787655650
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7787655252
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7787654335
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7787655854
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7787654938
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7787654536
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3069427091
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403847570
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403847572
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1103918420
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1103918421
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1103918422
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1103918423
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1103918424
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1120858622

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
EuroTornado (2023-08-18 08:19:56+00:00): Adresy zostały przeze mnie poprawione.
NorthCrab (2023-08-18 09:00:45+00:00): Wielkie dzięki za chęci i ogólnie za kontrybucję :D !
EuroTornado (2023-08-18 09:31:49+00:00): Będzie jeszcze troszkę zmian. Mam nadzieje, że OpenStreetMap wyprzedzi konkurencje. Mam jeszcze pytanie. W jaki sposób oznaczyć furtkę wejściową/wyjściową z osiedla i na osiedle. ?
NorthCrab (2023-08-18 10:53:56+00:00): Jako zwykła gate/brama (ten sam sposób co na drodze). Na punkcie lub na linii ale punkt jest częściej spotykany. Punkt ten powinien być połączony z linią chodnika i ewentualnie też z ogrodzeniem, jeśli takie jest oznaczone.
Carto'Cité (2023-12-30 14:22:34+00:00): Bonjour Aradrin,
J'ai procédé à pas de modifications dans ce secteur et je ne te contacte qu'après. Excuse-moi déjà pour la démarche.
J'ai vu que tu avais ajouté beaucoup de bicycle=designated sur les cheminements et ils semblent bien cyclables. Mais je n'ai aucune trace ou information d'une signalétique verticale ou horizontale à part quelques rares cas au sol et des panneaux C115 visibles ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=48.65716&lon=2.56303#map=17/48.65636/2.56465&layers=Y
Si tu passes dans le secteur, est-ce que tu pourrais vérifier s'il y a une signalétique et même faire des photos pour les mettre dans Panoramax pour avoir une trace ?
N’hésite pas à me contacter si tu as des remarques ou des questions.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Aradrin (2023-12-30 20:14:46+00:00): Hello, et aucun problème, j'ai fait pas mal de boulot à Combs-la-Ville, vu que j'y habite, mais une bonne partie il y a un moment.
En regardant cette zone, j'ai trouvé quelques panneaux C115 que je place moi-même, ça peut aider. J'ai aussi trouver des B22a qui rendent les choses confuses (un placé à la moitié de la rue sur un croisement, mais rien au début ou à la fin de la rue).
Voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145711633
Si c'est utile pour clarifier les choses, je continuerais. J'ai aussi l'occasion de discuter avec le directeur des services techniques de la ville fin Janvier, j'essaierais d'avoir des infos de sa part, il faut dire que la signalisation est pas folle dans cette ville