piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ToffeHoff (2026-01-20 20:19:01+00:00): Hi, thanks for fixing my mapnote regarding Patisserie Fes. 
Unfortunately, you did delete the Andalus Chick'n restaurant which is on the corner at housenr 1. I've restored that POI.
jb54osm (2026-01-20 20:39:39+00:00): Oeps. Ik herinner mijn zoektocht naar het adres. Had op nr. 1 terecht moeten komen. 
Afspraak in Nederland is dat POIs zo veel mogelijk op adresnodes worden gezet. Maar in Den Haag staat nog veel 'verkeerd'.
ToffeHoff (2026-01-20 20:48:09+00:00): Ah ok. Vraag is of die afspraak handig is, aangezien ik veel met Organic Maps werk om snel ontbrenkende POIs toe te voegen wanneer ik in de buurt ben. 
Daar kan ik niet een bestaande adres-node pakken en die aanpassen.
Kortom, op zich mooie afspraak, maar denk dat het in de praktijk lastig is om hieraan vast te houden.
Ben in ieder geval al blij dat POI informatie niet op gebouwen (area/lines) moeten komen te staan (en alleen op points)! Dat lijkt me veel beter op te volgen.
jb54osm (2026-01-20 20:52:40+00:00): Je kunt altijd een Opmerking achterlaten - of mij een PB sturen om de wijziging af te ronden. Als dan maar duidelijk is bij welk huisnummer de POI hoort.
NeisBot (2026-01-20 07:40:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/358429683 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Computer service company"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Computer-Service-Firma"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 07:29:41+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177792409
(No visible changes after review)
InsertUser (2026-05-02 21:02:07+00:00): What's your soruce for the outline on this? It doesn't appear to be on the main imagery sources yet.
nickjohnston (2026-05-03 15:40:04+00:00): The care home outline is from OS OpenMap Local I think.

The Petch Court development is approximate from a visual survey.
MxxCon (2026-01-21 01:53:24+00:00): Hello.
Please note that in this edit you mangled building shapes and incorrectly updated a building to extend over a sidewalk and into a road. Please make sure to draw buildings based on their base lines, not roof lines, since those can move based on satellite imagery angle.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177444478
vectorial8192 (2026-01-22 18:07:19+00:00): I actually dispute this mapping method. This naming strategy/guideline for "new projects" better be documented somehow because I can see this reoccurring a lot in the future.

My logic is that the name comes from e.g. the bidding document, it would read exactly something like "railway station located at East of Tung Chung".

Either the docs really said "Tung Chung East Station" which I might just miss or don't know how to check, or this changeset is disputed. Or we somehow irl-check this to confirm the name, which is not possible, and obviously it has to have a name, which leads to the descriptive name being the only acceptable name.
Kovoschiz (2026-01-23 17:01:58+00:00): https://mtrtungchunglineextension.hk/tung-chung-east/ ?
Kovoschiz (2026-01-23 17:03:14+00:00): https://www.mtr.com.hk/en/corporate/tenders/TUE_C12003.html ?
MarinoBM (2026-01-19 22:32:35+00:00): Hola rolross, bienvenido y gracias por tus Aportaciones a OpenStreetMap.
Quería que tuvieras en cuenta que el etiquetado procede del inglés y algunas etiquetas, como las de bar y pub, tienden a confusión porque las entendemos al revés. En OpenStreetMap y en OsmAnd 
amenity=bar es un bar musical, bar de copas o bar de ambiente
amenity=pub es el bar tradicional, con pinchos y café
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Objetos_que_generan_dudas_en_Espa%C3%B1a#B
Un saludo
MarinoBM (2026-01-21 22:51:45+00:00): Corregido.
habi (2026-01-19 19:13:19+00:00): Wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5131008
ratrun (2026-01-22 04:35:11+00:00): Der Feldweg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1468556219#map=17/46.808682/11.926120 sieht laut Luftbild Bing/Südtirol2020 total unrealistisch aus. Ausserdem geht er mitten durch ein Haus und endet auf beiden Enden im nirgendwo. Bitte überprüfe das nochmals!
wendenzo (2026-01-22 07:54:53+00:00): Ich werde das überprüfen, da wurde ungewollt ein Weg kopiert und verschoben.
uprkos (2026-01-23 22:51:48+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za edycje w KK! Jedna tylko uwaga - widzę, że tereny zielone oznaczasz domyślnie jako garden, ale to w OSM to ma dość wąskie znaczenie (urządzony ogród). Tu powinno być raczej scrub, w przypadku trawników między blokami dałbym grass.
michxu (2026-01-24 00:37:44+00:00): Dzięki! Bede na to zwracać uwagę :)
Wanderer2000 (2026-01-20 07:55:56+00:00): Waarom voeg je dit nu weer toe? Het geheel staat er al in als shrubbery.

For an area of maintained shrubs use natural=shrubbery. 
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dhedge
MxxCon (2026-01-21 01:55:27+00:00): It's great that you corrected this place of worship, however you forget to remove denomination=pentecostal tag. I highly doubt there are Pentecostal Buddhists😁
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177445920
Supaplex (2026-01-20 07:59:22+00:00): Revert vandalism: map on the ground situation
這是總統府，外面招牌並沒有「中华人民共和国台湾特别行政区政府」
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177446293
渤海西岸 (2026-01-22 03:02:51+00:00): 小粉红你搞这些有什么用呢？
no details provided here (2026-01-25 09:14:47+00:00): Can these paths be connected to the existing highways? New Osmose prompts noted for 'almost junctions'. Happy to assist.
Supaplex (2026-01-20 07:59:18+00:00): Revert vandalism: map on the ground situation
這是總統府，外面招牌並沒有「中华人民共和国台湾特别行政区政府」
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177446801
NeisBot (2026-01-20 07:41:14+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13468997943 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Szkolenia firmy"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Szkolenia firmy"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 07:29:48+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177792412
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-22 19:33:33+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11638534045
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418176531

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
tguen (2026-01-25 00:04:27+00:00): when you edit buildings or other areas, please press Q to square the corners wherever it's appropriate.
eggie (2026-01-19 20:50:22+00:00): Dag mrotman,
Je vraagt feedback.. Over zo'n erf dat lijkt me inderdaad access=private.. ook al zou er geen hek staan.
Doodlopende weg zegt overigens niets, want de tweewielers worden meestal vergeten.
Eigen Weg hoeft ook niet te betekenen dat je er niet mag komen. Dat taggen we met access=permissive , maar dit lijkt inderdaad meer op private.. zeker als er een hek staat. 

MVG
eggie
mrotman59 (2026-01-20 06:07:10+00:00): Als het maar als resultaat heeft dat bij een routering deze route gemeden wordt!!
Bedankt voor je reactie.
Groet, Martin
eggie (2026-01-20 08:51:52+00:00): De verbinding zal niet meer routeren.
Gr eggie
Kris74M (2026-01-19 23:14:26+00:00): Po co scalasz ronda na trasach linii autobusowych?
Artek (2026-01-20 14:40:41+00:00): Scalone rondo i tak pokazuje trasę w edytorze jako ciągłość. 
Tak to widać całą nazwę ronda, a jak było podzielone to jej nie wyświetlało, bo były za krótkie odcinki, tak jak w Bełchatowie Armii Krajowej/Wojska Polskiego. Jak inaczej rozwiązać taki problem?
Kris74M (2026-01-20 16:16:27+00:00): Hejka. Jak będzie długa nazwa, to i tak się nie wyświetli.
Ja robię tak:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/985732704
Artek (2026-01-20 20:23:24+00:00): W Pajęcznie właśnie działa dobrze a jest długa nazwa, a przy renderowaniu tras całe rondo też dobrze wygląda, jedynie do eksportu trzeba będzie rozdzielić.
Kris74M (2026-01-21 07:15:19+00:00): Hejka. Wg mnie to jest niepoprawne działanie. No i ja oraz wielu innych maperów, tworzę linie autobusowe poprzez relatify, więc i tak przy każdej drobnej zmianie na jakiejkolwiek linii, która przebiega przez takie poprawione rondo, ono zostanie i tak automatycznie podzielone.
Natfoot (2026-01-20 19:37:06+00:00): I just reviewed, looks mostly good. I changed the phone number to follow the guidelines here:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone
Natfoot (2026-01-20 19:37:52+00:00): Thanks for joining other volunteers in editing open street map.
DZONE Abbie (2026-01-21 01:05:53+00:00): Right on thanks! This whole open street map is pretty cool. I'll try to do more as I get acquainted with the system.
iamdavid (2026-02-01 11:47:39+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM. Ich habe deine Änderungen rückgängig gemacht. foot=no ist  falsch (access tag). Denn laufen ist da nicht verboten. sidewalk=no ist korrekt. siehe auch Diskussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5135634
Bitte beachte beim Wditieren der Daten die Anleitungen zu den Tags im Wiki. Viel Freude weiterhin beim Beitragen!
iamdavid (2026-02-01 11:54:48+00:00): Changeset rückgängig gemacht, siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177448129
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177448253
Frans S (2026-04-03 12:55:22+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
Your mappings deliver many issues because you added a buildig=yes node to a node of a mapped building.
A building is just to be mapped as building=yes. Not tag individual nodes as a building.
And as you mentioned, a lot of validation errors is NOT GOOD.
Best regards
Hb- (2026-01-19 20:58:28+00:00): This is www.osm.org/changeset/177448548 and changeset/177448548
Hb- (2026-01-19 20:58:50+00:00): c177448548
Hb- (2026-01-19 21:05:21+00:00): test #177448548
maro21 (2026-01-20 22:23:08+00:00): Pizza hut zmieniła się z baru w restaurację?
Kris74M (2026-01-21 07:23:13+00:00): Cześć. Dlaczego w Bełchatowie poprowadziłeś DW484 po DK74?
szalona_entropia (2026-01-21 10:28:23+00:00): Ponieważ stary przebieg DW484 przez miasto utracił kategorię drogi wojewódzkiej w dniu otwarcia wschodniej obwodnicy.
Kris74M (2026-01-21 16:42:36+00:00): Ale czy prowadzenie DW po DK jest poprawne? Nie powinno być DW do węzła z DK i później od węzła z DK?
szalona_entropia (2026-01-22 16:07:33+00:00): Wspólny przebieg DW po DK to sytuacja powszechnie występująca.
LordGarySugar (2026-01-19 21:06:29+00:00): It's Coole
finn-hound (2026-01-19 21:09:01+00:00): 😭
Berdly (2026-01-19 20:58:22+00:00): I meant to type “roads”, not “toads”m forgive me
Berdly (2026-01-19 20:58:51+00:00): And then I put “m” instead of a comma… Typic can be infuriating, especially when I cannot edit my previous messages to correct my typos.
Berdly (2026-01-19 20:59:12+00:00): And then I spelled “typing” as “typic”… God. Dang. It.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-22 19:14:36+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10032405903
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229456396

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2026-01-19 21:28:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
MxxCon (2026-01-21 01:58:27+00:00): Please note that "Public School 127" and "Aerospace Science Magnet School" should be mapped as 2 separate name tags.
Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names for a list of alternative name tags you can use.
Also please note that since this school is already mapped as school grounds, this building should not have the same name too. That duplicates the same info twice, and that's not correct in OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177449729
5m4u9 (2026-01-20 02:37:32+00:00): hola, la clasificación de carreteras en Bolivia prioriza la conexión entre ciudades/departamentos antes que el tipo de infraestructura.

de todas formas, ya existen etiquetas que indican que es no accesible una parte del año.
CiroRiva (2026-01-20 16:27:08+00:00): Vale, entendido!
He visto que usted ha corregido después de mi.
Glassman (2026-01-20 18:25:06+00:00): When adding the device, look for the pole's shadows base to correctly locate it. This one is in the middle of the road which doesn't seem right. The rest of your edits look good.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177450428
TwigLeafBird (2026-01-21 03:26:39+00:00): Oh thank you, good catch! This was the very first one I had done.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177450428
TwigLeafBird (2026-01-21 03:27:52+00:00): Is there a way to edit the node after creation, or do I need to delete somehow and create a new one? I know where the proper place is
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177450428
Glassman (2026-01-22 03:30:46+00:00): I've never used the app, but the developer is on Slack. I'll ask him there. If you open osm.org, go to the location, then hit edit. In the editor just move the node with your mouse. Save and upload.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177450428
TwigLeafBird (2026-01-27 03:33:04+00:00): Fixed, thank you! I don't see any way in the app but the OSM website did the trick. Thanks for teaching me something new!
Alex Klotz (2026-01-21 16:08:26+00:00): The USPS ZIP Code is not a GEO Code and USPS does not verify physical locations.  Online registration forms often utilize auto-correct features to assign non-municipal labels to fields, effectively replacing municipal entities with locality names whose boundaries are imprecise or not formally recognized as part of a legal address tied to deed, plot, lot, tax map
Alex Klotz (2026-01-21 16:18:26+00:00): The ZIP Code is not an element conveyed from seller to buyer in a real estate transaction.  Prospective buyers of real estate do not establish a relationship with the local Post Office before purchase.  According to USPS a 5-digit ZIP Code is not more than an internal USPS determination of through which Postal facility.  A ZIP Code with an additional 4 numbers can represent which side of the street mail can be delivered or the numerical value of a PO BOX itself.  USPS does not verify a physical address location.  The ZIP Code is an element of mail addressing, not physical addressing
Frans S (2026-04-04 10:53:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A bit late, but I am validating this task now.
Please use the tag building=yes instead of house. (default for HOTOSM_
Each rectangular building need to be squared with the Q key while still selected.
Best regards
dknelson9876 (2026-01-20 01:55:06+00:00): Thanks for this work, looks like a high quality changeset! For future reference, the operator:short=* tag is more commonly used for abbreviations instead of leaving out a single word (check it out for yourself at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/operator:short#values)
dmcg12 (2026-01-20 02:21:43+00:00): Thanks for the info. I set the operator:short tag based on what I have commonly heard the school district referred to as by locals. Some of the schools had that same name in the base operator tag before this change. The operator tag wiki page had a separate operator:abbr tag listed (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator#Further_details), so I didn't think that the :short tag would be used the same way. I also didn't think of checking Tag Info to see how the :short tag is typically used. Should I change or remove the operator:short tags, or is it OK?
NeisBot (2026-01-20 07:41:20+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/8568159456 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Gift shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 07:29:49+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177792413
(No visible changes after review)
chath_tsu (2026-01-19 22:29:37+00:00): tho the bikeway on the south side of fourth plain is twoway and separated from the roadway by flexposts and amadillos so maybe it should be mapped as a separate way?
dknelson9876 (2026-01-20 02:19:10+00:00): Did you miss that there's already three other amenity=bicycle_parking (one for each bank of lockers) right here?
aweech (2026-01-20 05:04:22+00:00): Those are all lockers that require payment. There's a bank of either stands or racks there as well. I'll be back later to get capacity and their exact shape.
Herwescheluc (2026-01-20 21:14:38+00:00): Hallo, Akino,

tolles CS! Habe eine Hs.-Nr. gefunden, die Du übersehen hast und ergänzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177495415#map=19/50.574928/8.286967&layers=N

Gut's Nächtle!

Andreas
Hypsometric (2026-01-20 03:26:04+00:00): What is this building? The name "Pavillion" should probably be removed. It is currently tagged as a ranger station. Is that still the case? For more info on names, please see the wiki on names: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
Croissant98520 (2026-01-20 06:05:49+00:00): Correct. My bad. Fixed. Thanks for noticing
rskedgell (2026-01-20 07:18:38+00:00): (Review requested)

Unfortunately, you can't use FindMyStreet for OpenStreetMap, see https://www.findmystreet.co.uk/terms-of-use

There are at least two sources of street names available as open data from Ordnance Survey, licensed under the Open Government Licence:

OS Open Names
https://osdatahub.os.uk/data/downloads/open/OpenNames

OS Open Roads
https://osdatahub.os.uk/data/downloads/open/OpenRoads
Krasha (2026-01-20 09:21:50+00:00): Thanks for the reply although I don't understand the TOS enough to see how that applies but that is over shadowed by my complete lack of knowledge on how to use the OS data sets; sorry that makes no sense to me at all. I wish there was an easier way to help out with editing - maybe I should have just said these were roads I've walked (which is true) and omitted the FMS reference. Sorry, not really a grumpy old man but I thought I was helping and maybe I'll leave it to others to sort out. Thanks for taking the time to reply. 😎
BCNorwich (2026-01-20 07:10:07+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Sorry to say, there are a few things wrong here. St Lukes is mapped to the NE Way: St. Luke's (38215816). I've removed the building from the park and reinstated the park's name.

Regards Bernard
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-05 05:46:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5234894 - can you take a look?
JC Gonzales (2026-01-20 22:52:37+00:00): moved the clubhouse by -0.46, -2.02
Udarian (2026-01-19 23:17:54+00:00): due to this changeset the geometry of the buildings is now broken, why have you done this?

Happy mapping,
Udar.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-03 14:55:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 185044755, 185044712, 185044792, 185043031, 185044858, 185044854, 185044726, 185044802, 185044684, 185044693, 185043064, 185044766, 185044834, 185044779, 185043050, 185044776, 185043074, 185043054, 185044732, 185043091, 185044704, 185044746, 185044715, 185043085, 185044894, 185044810, 185044795, 185044765, 185044862, 185043059, 185044750, 185044758, 185043076, 185044812, 185044785, 185043015, 185043039, 185044823, 185044748, 185044738, 185044744, 185044734, 185044845, 185044702, 185044835, 185044888, 185044873, 185044731, 185044879, 185044817, 185044827, 185044789, 185044865, 185044720, 185044843, 185043045, 185044839, 185044849, 185044771, 185044694, 185044768, 185044707, 185043066 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy imports in Ivory Coast
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-03 14:55:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 185044755, 185044712, 185044792, 185043031, 185044858, 185044854, 185044726, 185044802, 185044684, 185044693, 185043064, 185044766, 185044834, 185044779, 185043050, 185044776, 185043074, 185043054, 185044732, 185043091, 185044704, 185044746, 185044715, 185043085, 185044894, 185044810, 185044795, 185044765, 185044862, 185043059, 185044750, 185044758, 185043076, 185044812, 185044785, 185043015, 185043039, 185044823, 185044748, 185044738, 185044744, 185044734, 185044845, 185044702, 185044835, 185044888, 185044873, 185044731, 185044879, 185044817, 185044827, 185044789, 185044865, 185044720, 185044843, 185043045, 185044839, 185044849, 185044771, 185044694, 185044768, 185044707, 185043066 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy imports in Ivory Coast
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-03 14:55:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 185044755, 185044712, 185044792, 185043031, 185044858, 185044854, 185044726, 185044802, 185044684, 185044693, 185043064, 185044766, 185044834, 185044779, 185043050, 185044776, 185043074, 185043054, 185044732, 185043091, 185044704, 185044746, 185044715, 185043085, 185044894, 185044810, 185044795, 185044765, 185044862, 185043059, 185044750, 185044758, 185043076, 185044812, 185044785, 185043015, 185043039, 185044823, 185044748, 185044738, 185044744, 185044734, 185044845, 185044702, 185044835, 185044888, 185044873, 185044731, 185044879, 185044817, 185044827, 185044789, 185044865, 185044720, 185044843, 185043045, 185044839, 185044849, 185044771, 185044694, 185044768, 185044707, 185043066 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy imports in Ivory Coast