piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2024-07-30 13:43:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 154606945, 154607060, 154606852, 154606682, 154606922, 154606888, 154606817, 154607086, 154607139, 154607100, 154607116, 154606768, 154607328, 154606972, 154607347, 154607243, 154606611, 154607170, 154607000, 154607035, 154606643, 154607202, 154606740, 154606797, 154607308, 154607276, 154606705 where the changeset comment is: Whole World: the changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: duplicates of objects, undiscussed mass editing].
jorgeyp (2024-08-01 09:59:25+00:00): I've reverted this changed and fixed the junctions after surveying the area. The imagery is outdated and doesn't reflect the current situation.
mavl (2024-07-30 13:44:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 154606945, 154607060, 154606852, 154606682, 154606922, 154606888, 154606817, 154607086, 154607139, 154607100, 154607116, 154606768, 154607328, 154606972, 154607347, 154607243, 154606611, 154607170, 154607000, 154607035, 154606643, 154607202, 154606740, 154606797, 154607308, 154607276, 154606705 where the changeset comment is: Whole World: the changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: duplicates of objects, undiscussed mass editing].
mavl (2024-07-30 13:44:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 154606945, 154607060, 154606852, 154606682, 154606922, 154606888, 154606817, 154607086, 154607139, 154607100, 154607116, 154606768, 154607328, 154606972, 154607347, 154607243, 154606611, 154607170, 154607000, 154607035, 154606643, 154607202, 154606740, 154606797, 154607308, 154607276, 154606705 where the changeset comment is: Whole World: the changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: duplicates of objects, undiscussed mass editing].
mavl (2024-07-30 13:44:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 154606945, 154607060, 154606852, 154606682, 154606922, 154606888, 154606817, 154607086, 154607139, 154607100, 154607116, 154606768, 154607328, 154606972, 154607347, 154607243, 154606611, 154607170, 154607000, 154607035, 154606643, 154607202, 154606740, 154606797, 154607308, 154607276, 154606705 where the changeset comment is: Whole World: the changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: duplicates of objects, undiscussed mass editing].
muchichka_s (2024-07-27 08:45:21+00:00): Привіт. Старі назви треба переносити в old_name, замість запису через "/"
mavl (2024-07-30 13:44:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 154606945, 154607060, 154606852, 154606682, 154606922, 154606888, 154606817, 154607086, 154607139, 154607100, 154607116, 154606768, 154607328, 154606972, 154607347, 154607243, 154606611, 154607170, 154607000, 154607035, 154606643, 154607202, 154606740, 154606797, 154607308, 154607276, 154606705 where the changeset comment is: Whole World: the changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: duplicates of objects, undiscussed mass editing].
uvi (2024-07-28 17:58:01+00:00): Auch hier noch einmal die Aufforderung, die beschreibenden Bezeichungen nicht in "name" zu verwenden. Es wäre wirklich schade, wenn die Änderungssätze revertiert werden müssten - dann wäre die Arbeit umsonst. Bitte also vor weiteren Eintragungen korrigieren.
Bitte hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/ lesen und die etablierten Regeln einhalten!
vasony (2024-07-29 19:35:34+00:00): Helló!

Mi ez a busz sáv? 

Tamás
Vincenzo Szűcs Árpád (2024-07-29 20:52:21+00:00): Hello!

Ott van egy sávos út de csak Busznak van fent tartva . És egy irányú .

Üdv. Árpád!
vasony (2024-07-30 08:38:51+00:00): Szia!

Ennek megvan a saját jelölése. psv=designated, ha rárakod a név törölhető. 

Tamás
Vincenzo Szűcs Árpád (2024-07-30 13:50:44+00:00): Szia!
Rendben .
vasony (2024-07-30 14:46:42+00:00): közben megcsináltam
Syl (2024-07-27 09:08:58+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai modifié le tag fix en fixme.
LudovicG (2024-07-27 17:07:31+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci et sincèrement désolé.
Il doit y en avoir plusieurs de ma part ces derniers jours et dans la zone.
Syl (2024-07-27 18:23:52+00:00): J'ai aussi corrigé sur d'autres objets autour, j'avais oublié de le préciser.
Gasconha18 (2024-07-27 09:17:11+00:00): *C 3
Mahdi Nameghi (2024-07-27 11:39:48+00:00): ادیت شما ریورت خواهد شد. لطفا نقشه را خراب نکنید
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-08-07 07:45:08+00:00): Trong 4 relation 8063144, v4
8063149, v3
14381551, v3
17218481, v4,

Có cái nào em xóa nhầm thì có gì add lại giúp anh nhé. cảm giác như cái 8063144, 17218481, 8063149 nó có tồn tại và có logic ấy.
Tomek | Yanosik (2024-08-12 14:06:51+00:00): Czy na pewno przejezdna? Według mapki (http://www.secemin.pl/index.php?c=article&id=2363) w dalszym ciągu zakaz ruchu
Scout Jens (2024-07-28 16:11:53+00:00): *aufgelöst
Jordi MF (2024-07-28 19:10:22+00:00): Hola inode,

Crec que volies afegir una basseta en este punt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12076560119), però només has afegit un node amb el nom "Baseta 1968/1211". No sé què significa, així que deixe que ho soluciones tu.

Salutacions i gràcies.
inode64 (2024-07-29 11:38:27+00:00): Ya he ajustado el objeto correcto y he cambiado en la descripción la fecha de construcción, que cuando estaba usando el Osmand no había visto cual era el mejor en los cambios
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154558473
limes11 (2024-07-28 08:01:04+00:00): Hi

please check relation 17879349

It's broken.

Thanks !
GMason (2024-07-28 10:55:24+00:00): Thanks. I just fixed it.
osmviborg (2024-07-27 10:26:20+00:00): Når de enkelte bygninger kun er tagget med 'building=yes' giver det, i min optik, ikke mening. Prøv at se på skærmkortet når du redigerer bygninger.
Linus W Frische (2024-07-27 10:41:50+00:00): Skærmkortet er godt nok mere praktisk end Ortofoto, det kan jeg godt se ;-;

Har jeg forstået det ret at hvis jeg tagger bygningerne efter brug (kommericel, lejelighed etc.) så giver opsplittelsen mere mening?
osmviborg (2024-07-27 10:51:55+00:00): Præcis; men mange bygninger indeholder begge dele, forretninger i stuen og lejligheder på de andre etager.
Linus W Frische (2024-07-27 10:59:37+00:00): Jeg mindes at "building=apartments" godt må have butikker i bunden:

"A building arranged into individual dwellings, often on separate floors. May also have retail outlets on the ground floor"

(fra https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dapartments)

I Gaden er der selvfølgelig tale om barer, men ideen er vel den samme?

På BBR står der ofte hvad bygningerne bruges til.
osmviborg (2024-07-27 11:03:46+00:00): 👍
mavl (2024-07-30 13:44:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 154606945, 154607060, 154606852, 154606682, 154606922, 154606888, 154606817, 154607086, 154607139, 154607100, 154607116, 154606768, 154607328, 154606972, 154607347, 154607243, 154606611, 154607170, 154607000, 154607035, 154606643, 154607202, 154606740, 154606797, 154607308, 154607276, 154606705 where the changeset comment is: Whole World: the changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: duplicates of objects, undiscussed mass editing].
mavl (2024-07-30 13:44:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 154606945, 154607060, 154606852, 154606682, 154606922, 154606888, 154606817, 154607086, 154607139, 154607100, 154607116, 154606768, 154607328, 154606972, 154607347, 154607243, 154606611, 154607170, 154607000, 154607035, 154606643, 154607202, 154606740, 154606797, 154607308, 154607276, 154606705 where the changeset comment is: Whole World: the changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: duplicates of objects, undiscussed mass editing].
NieWnen (2024-07-27 14:36:22+00:00): Tutaj się 2 POI nałożyły.
mavl (2024-07-30 13:44:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 154606945, 154607060, 154606852, 154606682, 154606922, 154606888, 154606817, 154607086, 154607139, 154607100, 154607116, 154606768, 154607328, 154606972, 154607347, 154607243, 154606611, 154607170, 154607000, 154607035, 154606643, 154607202, 154606740, 154606797, 154607308, 154607276, 154606705 where the changeset comment is: Whole World: the changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: duplicates of objects, undiscussed mass editing].
mavl (2024-07-30 13:44:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 154606945, 154607060, 154606852, 154606682, 154606922, 154606888, 154606817, 154607086, 154607139, 154607100, 154607116, 154606768, 154607328, 154606972, 154607347, 154607243, 154606611, 154607170, 154607000, 154607035, 154606643, 154607202, 154606740, 154606797, 154607308, 154607276, 154606705 where the changeset comment is: Whole World: the changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: duplicates of objects, undiscussed mass editing].
aseidel (2024-07-30 09:56:56+00:00): Liebe:r ChMenges,
bitte den Tag source=mapillary an den Wegen entfernen. Der Tag source=* wird nicht direkt am Objekt gesetzt, sondern automatisch durch den Editor iD eingetragen, wenn Sie beim Abspeichern unter "Quellen" "Erhebung vor Ort" auswählen. 
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
mavl (2024-07-30 13:44:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 154606945, 154607060, 154606852, 154606682, 154606922, 154606888, 154606817, 154607086, 154607139, 154607100, 154607116, 154606768, 154607328, 154606972, 154607347, 154607243, 154606611, 154607170, 154607000, 154607035, 154606643, 154607202, 154606740, 154606797, 154607308, 154607276, 154606705 where the changeset comment is: Whole World: the changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: duplicates of objects, undiscussed mass editing].
mavl (2024-07-30 13:43:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 154606945, 154607060, 154606852, 154606682, 154606922, 154606888, 154606817, 154607086, 154607139, 154607100, 154607116, 154606768, 154607328, 154606972, 154607347, 154607243, 154606611, 154607170, 154607000, 154607035, 154606643, 154607202, 154606740, 154606797, 154607308, 154607276, 154606705 where the changeset comment is: Whole World: the changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: duplicates of objects, undiscussed mass editing].
mavl (2024-07-30 13:44:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 154606945, 154607060, 154606852, 154606682, 154606922, 154606888, 154606817, 154607086, 154607139, 154607100, 154607116, 154606768, 154607328, 154606972, 154607347, 154607243, 154606611, 154607170, 154607000, 154607035, 154606643, 154607202, 154606740, 154606797, 154607308, 154607276, 154606705 where the changeset comment is: Whole World: the changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: duplicates of objects, undiscussed mass editing].
osmviborg (2024-07-28 18:15:06+00:00): Hvad siger lodsejeren til at du tegner stier der krydser vedkommendes private matrikel?
aseidel (2024-07-30 09:53:35+00:00): Lieber ChMenges,
bitte beim hw=track https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128955793 den tracktype=* wieder hinzufügen (ggf. den Wert von grade4 anpassen, falls dieser nicht stimmt).
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 04:18:52+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164839842
mueschel (2024-07-30 14:56:04+00:00): Hi,
please check the name tag on this relation:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17879807
Larmax (2024-07-30 19:09:25+00:00): Hi,
Fixed, thanks for pointing that out.
antonr (2024-07-27 11:42:30+00:00): Jeg kan se du forsøger at gøre et eller andet... Måske relateret til https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153580094. Igen er det fuldstændig umuligt at gennemskue din hensigt fordi du genbruger den samme generiske beskrivelse "Tilføjelser/rettelser - Vestjylland".... 

Hvis din hensigt er at tilbagerulle ændringer, synes jeg en god changeset comment være noget i retning af:

"Sejs. Tilbageruller ændringer fra https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153580094, da de slettede aktuelle data"

På den måde er det klart for andre hvad du forsøger at gøre, og hvorfor. Det letter samarbejdet.
osmviborg (2024-07-27 11:48:06+00:00): Konstruktionsområdet er vist blevet til en parkeringsplads. Kan du ikke tegne pladsen, ikke kun vejene på pladsen?
antonr (2024-07-27 11:55:45+00:00): Du har helt ret i at byggepladsen ikke længere findes. Det var afspejlet i situationen før 153580094. Der er masser af detaljer der kunne tilføjes, men jeg tænker ikke at det påvirker at tilstanden før 153580094 bare var bedre end den er nu.

Jeg kan anbefale https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter

På den måde er man sikker på at få rullet det hele tilbage. Den kan endda rulle flere changesets tilbage på en gang så vidt jeg huske.
antonr (2024-07-27 12:02:32+00:00): PS Hvis du foretrækker at jeg ruller tilbage, gør jeg gerne det. Jeg holdt mig tilbage fra at gøre det i første omgang i et forsøg på at være høflig.
antonr (2024-07-27 15:09:59+00:00): Hej igen,
Jeg tillod mig at tolke stilheden som at du ikke har noget imod at jeg gør noget. Så det har jeg gjort i https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154488510. Lad mig endelig høre hvis du har kommentarer til hvordan kortlægningen eller fremgangsmåden.
God weekend!
aseidel (2024-07-30 09:51:06+00:00): Lieber ChMenges,
bitte surface-Tagging korrigieren: concrete:plates (kein Unterstrich).
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
aseidel (2024-07-30 09:47:59+00:00): Liebe:r ChMenges,
bitte bei Punktobjekten/Verkehrszeichen nur die drei Tags traffic_sign=*, mapillary=* und direction=* nutzen (korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12033857483; siehe auch die Verkehrszeichen-Beispiele in unserer Tagging-Beispielsammlung). Der Tag source=* wird nicht am Punktobjekt gesetzt, sondern automatisch durch den Editor iD eingetragen, wenn Sie beim Abspeichern unter "Quellen" "Erhebung vor Ort" auswählen.
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
Frans S (2024-07-27 12:17:43+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping.

E: Buildings not squared.

Buildings wrongly tagged.  Building=yes is the correct tag.
Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154479032
Frans S (2024-07-27 12:37:55+00:00): Hi. Back againg.
The Esri imagery is of a poor qualite and bad to map from.
Switch regelary to the Bing imager (after adjusting the offset)  and use this to map as well. Esri is leading . So When Bing shows no building (Bing might be showing imagers back to 2012) and Esri shows buildings, map them.

Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154479032
Frans S (2024-07-27 12:39:29+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping.
E: Buildings not squared.
 Buildings need to be tagged as building=yes

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154479032
eggie (2024-07-27 21:35:09+00:00): Dag Bert   Je hebt het pad verwijderd, maar de doorwaadbare plaats laten staan in OSM. Is het nog steeds een doorwaadbare plaats of kan die node ook weg?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=154479155

MVG
eggie
antonr (2024-07-27 12:43:29+00:00): Jeg forstår ikke helt hvad din strategi er... Min tanke er at det ville være smart at blive enige om hvad der skal gøres, før vi gør det (fx i den tråd vi har gang i her: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154478056, eller her https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153580094).

Jeg tænker at jeg har bedre forudsætninger for at tilføje gode data lige her, da jeg har godt opdateret lokalkendskab, mens det lader til at du baserer dine tilføjelser på uddaterede andenhåndskilder... Det er på baggrund af mit lokalkendskab at jeg anbefalede at rulle 153580094 tilbage.

Hvad tænker du om det forslag?
Frans S (2024-07-27 12:59:11+00:00): See my comments on another changeset.
Your mappings are still under par. Please improve your mapping skills and square each building.
Quality prevails above Quantity.


Info on this document might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154480626
arsenyspb (2024-07-27 12:35:27+00:00): Adding one-way road to guide Driver Partners from delivery and ride-hailing and as a follow-up to escalation from residents of Buckley Classique
Nathan_A_RF (2024-07-29 16:52:12+00:00): Are you sure these roads are 60mph (National Speed Limit)? They look built up in places, particularly at the northern end.
Adam Edwards (2024-07-29 18:59:53+00:00): These are no speed restriction signs on the road and when you turn off into the estate to the west (Thistle Hill Way) the speed goes down to 30 with national speed limit applies on the reverse side indicating that part of Scocles Road is 60 mph.  I came down via Elm Lane which is national speed limit from the corner near Drake Ave so, I assume that limit applies.  I didn't cycle the north end of Scocles Road so don't know if the limit changes somewhere.  I'll check to make sure I've not added a limit I cannot verify.
busnotturno95 (2024-07-27 13:03:22+00:00): Suddivisa la linea STIBM z209 in due relazioni distinte per andata (Monza FS → Paderno Dugnano FN) e ritorno (Paderno Dugnano FN → Monza FS) ed esteso quest'ultima fino a Via Giuseppe Mazzini a Muggiò. Creata area pedonale nei pressi di via Filippo Turati a Monza.
BCNorwich (2024-07-27 14:09:40+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution.

I've unjoined the path line from the landuse (field) outline, as per OSM practice. One question is the footpath formally named or signed and verifiable as per:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability ? Or is 'Numbers Farm permissive path' a description. If it is then the name= tag should be changed to description=.

Regards Bernard.
andy_b (2024-07-27 17:11:39+00:00): Thanks for the welcome, and for the fixes too. I've swapped the name and description as suggested. 

The road that forks off from Egg Farm Lane to Numbers farm and on to Sheppey's Lane is gated. So over the last couple of years or so it seems the preferred route is the permissive one around the field and up to Tom's Lane.
aki007 (2024-07-27 13:18:28+00:00): based on photos here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4270477#map=19/51.40893/5.53301
eggie (2024-07-28 07:11:12+00:00): Dag aki, 
 Je vraagt feedback. Ik heb de spatie in de postcode aangepast.
Helaas rendert de club nog niet op de standaardkaart. Een kaart laat niet alles zien.
MVG
eggie
aki007 (2024-07-28 14:00:18+00:00): 👍
Taya_S (2024-07-27 18:47:46+00:00): I do not see this quarry on any of the aerials. Do you have a source for this?
Adrien Ri (2024-07-27 21:03:48+00:00): Described here  
https://www.mining-technology.com/projects/metro-minings-bauxite-hills-project-cape-york-queensland/?cf-view
and also some over aerials show that start of mining here .
joost schouppe (2024-09-13 11:15:50+00:00): Je heb hier van het vakantiedomeintje één groot gebouw gemaakt. Ik heb er terug een https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=chalet van gemaakt. Als je de wiki erop naleest lijkt dit me de meest juiste tag
pepsi_max2k (2025-12-26 06:31:51+00:00): Pretty much all the plots from the north east to the valley are for Quat and Peach blossom trees - in which case shouldn't they all be Plant Nursery with Plant = Trees? Instead or orchard or allotments. Will change myself if no objections.
pepsi_max2k (2025-12-26 06:33:32+00:00): *north west to the valley.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-24 12:46:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1083022129/history - to ona istnieje czy nie?

Bo jak nie to powinna być skasowana a nie dostawac note
Gregory Peony (2024-07-27 23:49:59+00:00): I think that WAY: 1286482007 is two adjacent buildings. The Eastern building is significantly larger than this footprint would suggest. Using alternate imagery can sometimes allow you to see the complete size and shape of obscured buildings. In this case the building is visible in ESRI with a silver roof. Using bing as the base (lower) layer with 100% opacity you can add ESRI, then reduce its opacity to x<50% and align it to bing. You can open this changeset in josm by pressing "J" in OSMCha. Check the homepage for more shortcuts.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154484987
Norbert Dichter (2024-07-28 09:49:11+00:00): Thx.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154484987
Dawid2849 (2024-08-13 15:21:32+00:00): do takich obiektów warto dodawać religię. jeśli jest to katolicka kapliczka, to warto jeszce dodać:
religion=christian
denomination=roman_catholic
Baloo Uriza (2024-08-01 15:27:53+00:00): Not exactly sure what's going on here due to the huge area involved and osmcha not showing any tags changed?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154485350
zluuzki (2024-08-05 08:43:00+00:00): fixing my own tagging to something more accurate
aTarom (2024-07-31 13:59:20+00:00): Hola, puedes revisar este tag
"roller_coaster"="station"?
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12076924300/history
saludos
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-27 14:20:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2319928360
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/352762281

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mavl (2024-08-07 11:02:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154930045 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16542].
Syl (2024-07-30 15:42:42+00:00): Hello, the phone still work? Very few in France does.
blackadder (2024-07-30 15:55:57+00:00): Good question, alas I did not check it.
Hungerburg (2024-07-27 16:27:18+00:00): Der Stempel Kaiserstand ist hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8000036156 - evtl. Lus?
Travelfreund (2024-07-27 17:37:25+00:00): Dachte ich auch. Aber ich war heute da und der Stempel stempelt dort tatsächlich Kaiserstand in meinen Wanderpass. Am Kaiserstand war ich noch nicht. Was tun?