piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bxl-forever (2025-10-13 15:49:01+00:00): Hello,

Please avoid clicking on "suggestions" from the iD editor.  A lot of those suggestions are plainly wrong, in particular those related to public transport.  (The list they use for their suggestions contains bad values, for instance they do not know that the Brussels metro system has the same operator as the tram, and they consequently suggest "upgrading the tags" and add incorrect values.)

I restored previous data, and pushed one more commit this morning to request updating the name-suggestion-index, hoping they will finally address the issue and prevent new people from repeatedly making the same mistakes.

What you can do to help: continue mapping normally but avoid those automatic suggestions for PT infrastructure. ;-)

Thanks.
Reisinformatiegroep (2025-10-14 08:55:34+00:00): Thnx for your message and I will ignore  the iD editor suggestions for public transport
kasa kai (2025-10-13 08:38:21+00:00): Fixes for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173211521
kasa kai (2025-10-13 08:43:11+00:00): Fixes for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167924592
literan (2025-10-13 19:56:27+00:00): нет, это не почтовые отделения
AndyB_66 (2025-10-16 15:57:40+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
habi (2025-10-13 09:40:21+00:00): Ich hab' mal versucht m-way in den Name Suggestion Index aufzunehmen, dann könnte das evtl. etwas früher auffallen: https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/pull/11454
Piagno (2025-10-13 17:29:56+00:00): oh cool, gute Idee, merci :)
eggie (2025-10-13 08:25:12+00:00): Dag Johan,

Ik heb de adresnode weer hersteld.
In het vervolg svp alleen de bedrijfsinfo verwijderen.
MVG
eggie
Johan3822 (2025-10-13 08:38:31+00:00): Dag Eggie,
Dank je wel... mijn excuus.
eggie (2025-10-13 08:47:44+00:00): No problem...
kasa kai (2025-10-13 08:39:04+00:00): Fixes for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167924783
user_5359 (2025-10-14 10:57:00+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/389212391, https://www.osm.org/way/1441824297. What is the mean of the tag RUNTIME = QUALIFICATIONS?
i5IoXTZhmQ61ragH (2025-10-19 10:22:29+00:00): Hello! I have no idea, honestly, and this was not put intentionally. Probably, the plug-in of the editor have taken it from somewhere.

I already see that this is fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173276632, thus I take no action.

Thanks for your question and have a nice day!
kasa kai (2025-10-13 08:39:35+00:00): Fixes for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167925127
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-14 06:35:45+00:00): Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5005156 ?

(and thanks for all mapping!)
Lyon-St-Clair (2025-10-14 18:01:03+00:00): pour la rue du Mas Rouge, c'est un cul de sac de façon définitive à priori.
Gustry (2025-10-15 07:25:01+00:00): Je ne suis pas sur de comprendre le message. Je n'ai pas touché la rue du Mas Rouge dans ce changeset.

Peut-être une typo sur la rue du Mas de Brousse, dont j'ai enlevé le tag cul du sac dans ce changeset, car ce n'est pas du tout un cul de sac.

Ah, je viens de voir le changeset : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173288375#map=19/43.600750/3.917894 non c'est une erreur, en tout cas à l'heure actuelle, c'est bien connecté, bitumé, avec des panneaux céder le passage par rapport à la nouvelle piste cyclable.
pitfire (2025-10-14 07:14:03+00:00): Hallo nols420,

hier fehlt der Gesamtumriss der Parkfläche!
Bitte nutze amenity=parking_space, um den einzelnen Stellplatz (für ein Fahrzeug) innerhalb eines größeren Parkplatzes zu markieren. Einzelne Parkplätze zu kartografieren ist eine Ergänzung zu amenity=parking, womit der gesamte Parkplatz erfasst wird. 

VG pitfire
nols420 (2025-10-14 10:16:36+00:00): Hey pitfire, danke für den Hinweis. Ich bin mir nicht sicher ob ich nun den langen Parkstreifen von oben verlängern sollte, oder eine eigene Umrandung für die 5 Stellplätze erstellen sollte. Wenn ich den von oben verlängere würde dieser aber eine Absolutes Halteverbot Zone mit einschließen.
pitfire (2025-10-14 11:04:09+00:00): Hi nols420,
nein würde ich nicht verlängern.
Gib den "parking_space" einen eigenen Umriss mit "amenity= 	parking und parking=street_side und dem oberen noch ein street_side, dann passt es. 
Hatte ich auch übersehen. :-)
VG
nols420 (2025-10-14 12:57:17+00:00): Alles klar, sollte in #173273944 gefixed sein.
Danke für die Hilfe ;)
burrscurr (2025-12-08 19:07:25+00:00): Hi Kookykooky,

I came across this change and am a bit unsure in which way these allotments are in fact a amenity=community_center. From looking at their website, this place is described as having a toilet since 2012 and a specific plot that can be rented for parties (neither of which strikes me as particularly community-center like). Do you have specific knowledge about this place?

In the future, please consider adding a source=... tag to your changeset to help other mappers better understand your changes.

Cheers!
burrscurr

https://kgv-flora1-dresden.de/weiteres/ueber-uns/
Kookykooky (2025-12-09 09:46:42+00:00): Hi burrscurr,
I looked at it and I guess I didn't choose the right category. It really doesn't look like a community center. I removed the tag. I'll try to be more careful next time. Thanks
Have a nice day
Kookykooky
aixbrick (2025-10-13 17:22:19+00:00): Hello,
"operator", that means who is responsible for the platform (sign), is only the ASEAG. Neither there is a TEC sign nor TEC would fix it in case of damage (or update the timetable...).
Regarding "network": The bus line 14 belongs to both networks, but the platform does not. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref:IFOPT. That ID is given by the AVV.
Regards
multimob (2025-10-14 14:14:18+00:00): You have a valid point here.

We are currently discussing the tags for public transport in Belgium, because the legacy way of having "operator" and "network" tags on every line but also every stop should perhaps be changed.
aixbrick (2025-11-03 10:20:12+00:00): Restored the original values with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174140124.
TinPetreković (2025-10-13 09:57:51+00:00): Fixed in changeset 173218187

openstreetmap.org/changeset/173218187
user_5359 (2025-10-16 09:41:39+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/3567833. What is the mean of the tag cai:api = https://osm2cai.cai.it/api/v2/hiking-route/833 (content is a geojson of the route coordinates)?
eggie (2025-10-13 09:48:41+00:00): Hi Reporter,

Better create  separate nodes.

Greetz,
eggie
Andrea Musuruane (2025-10-13 15:26:15+00:00): Ciao. OpenStreetMap non e' il posto giusto dove inserire i propri percorsi. Ciao, Andrea
osmviborg (2025-10-14 05:54:08+00:00): https://www.assens.dk/om-os/nyt-fra-assens-kommune/nyheder-og-pressemeddelelser/forvent-laengere-rejsetid-ved-glamsbjerg-fra-mandag-den-3-marts
foreigner037 (2025-10-14 12:20:32+00:00): Здравей,

по последна информация все още се извършват СМР в района. highway=* + access=no според мен трябва да се ползва само когато обектът е предаден, и въпреки това няма достъп, както ще се случи с малко парче след етапната връзка.
m_zahariev (2025-10-14 12:25:38+00:00): Здрасти,
На мен от последното видео ми изглежда като точно това, което описваш. Може би само в участък от няколкостотин метра не са монтирали мантинела, но всичко останало изглежда завършено на 100%.
foreigner037 (2025-10-14 12:32:00+00:00): Ами, щом още има хора на терен значи не е предаден.
osmviborg (2025-10-14 05:48:32+00:00): Forældede ortofotos giver utidssvarende opdateringer.
osmviborg (2025-10-14 06:29:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172469911
NeisBot (2025-10-13 09:46:48+00:00): Hola jorafa051194, bienvenido y gracias por tu contribución.

Para facilitar la colaboración y ayudar a los demás a entender tus ediciones, es mejor agregar una breve descripción de los cambios que realizaste. Los comentarios claros ayudan a la comunidad a seguir tu trabajo y proporcionar mejores comentarios. Puedes encontrar consejos para escribir buenos comentarios aquí[1].

Basado en tus ediciones del mapa en este conjunto de cambios, he redactado una sugerencia sobre cómo podría parecerse un comentario: "Agregué edificios con varias alturas, incluyendo un parque"
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi jorafa051194, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added buildings with various heights, including a park"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
eggie (2025-10-13 11:44:35+00:00): Hoi notabear,

Schuiven met de kaart geeft vaak schade door onbedoelde verplaatsingen van nodes met alles dat er aan vast zit.
Ook zijn je edits lastig te valideren.
Beperk svp het gebied van je edits.

Mapse,
eggie
Arezoo momtaz (2025-10-13 09:57:17+00:00): خیلی صبور تو مشاوره دادن و دلسوز هستین..مممنونم
habi (2025-10-13 09:57:02+00:00): Notiz https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4999141 erledigt, die im Changeset-Kommentar erwähnte Notiz ist hier ein copy-paste-Fehler...
the-wouter (2025-10-15 17:10:13+00:00): Please note: I have removed the house number from the tag {{addr:street}}
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-10-16 09:37:20+00:00): Thank you for your alert, a correction is in progress
Ze0zohk1 (2026-06-03 10:01:13+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173146501
osm_damuels_mellau (2025-10-18 10:30:41+00:00): Hallo, erst mal vielen Dank für ihre Arbeit. Gibt es einen Grund, warum Sie die linke Piste zum kleinen Lift nicht reaktiviert haben? 

Gruß Gbf
Graubündenfan (2025-10-20 06:54:06+00:00): Hallo, sehr gerne. Mir ist leider nicht bekannt, ob diese Piste noch in Betrieb ist. Bei mehreren Besuchen vor Ort war diese Piste nicht vorhanden, weshalb ich sie aufgrund fehlender Beweise (noch) nicht reaktiviert habe.
osm_damuels_mellau (2025-10-20 20:36:06+00:00): Das kann gut sein, wenn sie schon vor der Schließung selten offen war, wird man sich wohl auch jetzt nicht die Mühe machen...  
Vielen Dank
fortera_au (2025-11-10 03:21:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174443403 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
Frans S (2025-12-01 13:26:46+00:00): Hello. Please check this video about higher buildings.
For buildings with a few floors, start watching from 1 minute. 
Best regards
Langlaeufer (2025-10-14 10:17:23+00:00): Das Tagging ist falsch. Es muss eine "Objektart" bleiben. highway=path würde sich anbieten, wenn es noch als Pfad nutzbar ist.
Die Sperrung eintragen access=no!
foot=yes entfernen, denn es erlaubt die Nutzung als Fußgänger die doch angeblich verboten ist.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173219364
Filip009 (2025-12-30 10:30:28+00:00): Hello, access was added due to law about protected areas in Slovakia. In protected areas in Slovakia is prohibited to walk on paths which are not parts of marked routes.
Warin61 (2025-10-15 00:04:08+00:00): Hi
This does not make sense? 
Each way is tagged as a building - making them seperate buildings.
The relation also tags tham as a building - a single building. 
Which is it??? 
Next issue .. a multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments.. as in what I assume is a common wall shared between the two? buildings.
Warin61 (2025-10-15 00:11:22+00:00): Humm further... 

The larger area (way 1367194501) carries the tag shop=* and barnd information. I think this is correct,

The relation than duplicates this shop information. 

Then the seperat building ways duplicate the brand information. 

The guide is 'one feature = one OSM entry' .. here there are 4! 

I would delete the relation. Remove the brand and name tags fro the building separate ways ... I think that would be best???
AndyB_66 (2025-10-13 13:00:18+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
SafwatHalaby (2025-10-14 11:38:09+00:00): שלום, אין להוסיף שמות תאוריים כגון "מערה". או "ברז מים". הנחיות מלאות:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HE:Israel
AndyB_66 (2025-10-13 13:00:10+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
AndyB_66 (2025-10-13 12:59:05+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
eggie (2025-10-13 12:03:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
PeachyOne (2025-10-13 11:37:58+00:00): Από που κι ως που ο δρόμος αυτός https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441856003 φαίνεται στο Esri; Έχεις κάποια άλλη πηγή στην οποία βασίζεσαι;
AndyB_66 (2025-10-13 12:58:17+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Yog Sot (2025-10-13 23:12:53+00:00): ale w każdej wspólnocie mieszkaniowej będziesz ustawiał permissive? ;]
Przecież po tych ścieżkach, trawnikach i tp kżdy może wejśc, nie ma bramy, jakaś ochrona w ogóle krąży i wyprasza ludzi jak np pies nie wiem... nie ma kagańca? ;]
Feskil (2025-10-14 11:21:26+00:00): Nie, ale jak opracowuję teren, to staram się to robić komplementarnie :)

Permissive oznacza, że teren jest prywatny i jego dostęp może być ograniczony przez wlaściciela, nie musi być ogrodzony.

Na tym terenie obowiązuje regulamin UPP i jest ochrona, która wyprasza przy złamaniu regulaminu lub wzywa straż miejską do np. bezdomnych alkoholików
Yog Sot (2025-10-14 12:14:35+00:00): każda wspólnota mieszkaniowa to teren prywatny xD
No ale okej, alkoholicy tez mają prawo wiedzieć, że wstęp może byc im zabroniony gdy nawigują w mapycz drogę dojścia do płaza ;]
user_5359 (2025-10-15 10:07:25+00:00): Hello! Please notice the spelling of the key highway (instead of higway, iIwill correct this)
Tomasz Buchholz (2025-10-14 19:35:29+00:00): Cześć,
Jakie jest źródło tej ścieżki:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441859514
Nie widziałem jej podczas spaceru.
PeachyOne (2025-10-13 11:32:07+00:00): Ποιά είναι η λογική που μετατράπηκε το https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/484377971 σε highway=secondary?
user_5359 (2025-10-14 11:24:56+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1441858420. What is the mean of the tag волокна = красне синє?
user_5359 (2025-10-14 11:27:40+00:00): Hello! Please have also a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13230186513. What is the mean of the tags
красне красне=школа
синє синє=садок
?
VictorIE (2025-11-03 19:46:47+00:00): Hi,

Did a substation get disappeared?
VictorIE (2025-12-05 21:48:03+00:00): Substation restored.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456366384/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1004745820/
eireidium (2025-12-05 22:08:38+00:00): Thanks for fixing - I couldn't reverse my mistake.
AndyB_66 (2025-10-13 12:57:05+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
PeachyOne (2025-10-13 11:51:52+00:00): Με ποιο σκεπτικό έγιναν οι αλλαγές σε highway=trunk;
What is the justification for changing to highway=trunk?
Comino (2025-10-13 12:03:48+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
eggie (2025-10-13 11:48:15+00:00): Hoi Haags Happie  Je vraagt feedback.
'Paar kleine aanpassingen! ' zegt niemand iets. Probeer concreet aan te geven wat je doet.
Bv betaalmogelijkheden aangepast. 

MVG
eggie
Patryk Piotrowski (2025-10-13 11:57:32+00:00): *Osiedle Botanika - błąd językowy ;)
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-14 00:43:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13230245179
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13230245180

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Patryk Piotrowski (2025-10-14 11:47:34+00:00): Zestaw zmian: 173270546 - poprawiono adresy.
BCNorwich (2025-10-13 13:28:48+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Can you explain what your intention is with this tagging to an existing highway node, please? As such, it doesn't make any sense.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2025-10-24 06:15:35+00:00): No response so I've removed the tags.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-14 00:43:11+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13230232157

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Jordi MF (2025-10-13 19:23:25+00:00): He visto que has dibujado edificios dentro de otros edificios para intentar mapear los "huecos". En OSM deben crearse relaciones. Antes de seguir mapeando de esta forma incorrecta, consulta la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Saludos
jorafa051194 (2025-10-13 19:35:58+00:00): Hola gracias.

Lo tendré en cuenta.

Un saludo.
Dimitar155 (2025-10-13 12:36:02+00:00): Частично върната

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173225616
bxl-forever (2025-10-13 12:46:01+00:00): Hello,

There is already a building with housenumber 9, on the other side of the street.  Your edit created a duplicate address… in the middle of a park.

Would you mind having a second look?
Mr9000 (2025-10-13 12:56:01+00:00): this park seems to be gone actually, and there are multiple offices here, all with the same address - I created a note on this park with the comment that there are now offices here
Mr9000 (2025-10-13 13:06:46+00:00): maybe I was wrong, after some browsing I found out the park seems to be new, the offices are gone and that indeed the location of the SAP office was off - I updated it to the correct building
Jordi MF (2025-10-13 19:20:43+00:00): Hola jorafa,

Viendo que estás añadiendo la etiqueta height=*, ésta se usa para la altura en metros, no para el número de pisos. ¿Cómo has calculado la altura exacta? ¿Todo el edificio tiene la misma altura? Si no se ha calculado de forma exacta es mejor usar usar el número de pisos que se pueden conocer gracias a la capa del Catastro y dibujar sus partes por separado building:part=yes.

Te recomiendo echar un vistazo a la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part
jorafa051194 (2025-10-13 19:34:29+00:00): Buenas,
La altura se está calculando con la regla de google earth. Me informaré de los métodos que comentas.

Gracias
Jordi MF (2025-10-13 20:09:52+00:00): Gracias a ti por responder. En OpenStreetMap no está permitido usar datos de guentes que no nos hayan dado permiso. Obviamente, no tenemos permiso de Google para copiar o usar sus datos. Tenemos permiso explícito para usar datos de algunas instituciones públicas, de Strava y otros. Pero si se usan datos sin permiso, estamos infringiendo el copyright y, si alguna de estas empresas lo detecta, el proyecto de OSM puede tener problemas legales.

Por eso, en este caso, es mejor usar la información del Catastro porque sí que tenemos su permiso en España.

Parece que sea seco respondiendo, pero lo hago para ir directo al grano.

Saludos
NeisBot (2025-10-13 12:18:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-18 11:10:09+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173242209
Kays (2025-10-18 18:17:59+00:00): failed verification; ways 240284575, 258385110, 268341861, 268341864 are not accessible at the moment
jengelh (2025-10-19 11:49:24+00:00): The parts that I marked as access=no are sufficient to influence local routing (e.g. from exit 72 to Lenglern).

If you need more and/or have observed other segments being inaccessbile, feel free to open an editor yourself.
Fraxi (2025-10-13 12:45:50+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bg:WikiProject_Bulgaria#%D0%98%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B8_%D0%B8_%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B4%D0%B8
Fraxi (2025-10-13 13:03:07+00:00): Направих някои корекции по тази промяна:
-махнах ул." пред името
-от супермаркета махнах част от адресните данни. Следва да бъде или само квартала с блока или името на улицата с номера ѝ. Вижте от приложения линк по-надолу.
-Кирилизирах имена.
-Оправих формата на телефонния номер
Когато адреса присъства върху полигона на сградата, не е нужно добавянето му върху точката на търговския обект, освен в някои случаи.
Fraxi (2025-10-13 13:06:09+00:00): И адресът на Кам-маркет-а не може да е с №710Б(както беше). №170 е номерът на блока отсреща...
Langlaeufer (2025-10-14 10:20:32+00:00): Hallo Thundrafox,
bitte die Bürgersteige nicht für Bushaltestelle unterbrechen - das gibt Probleme im Fußgängerrouting. Entweder du packst public_transport:platform an den footway oder besser du zeichnest den "Bussteig" auf entlang der Bordsteinkante als separate Linie. Die muss auch nicht mit dem Fußweg verbunden werden.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173225176
Thundafox (2025-10-14 11:55:33+00:00): dann ist die Warnung vom ID editor zwecks Anbindung an einen Weg zu ignorieren? habe Die Bürgersteige jetzt von den Wartebereichen wieder gelöst und diese miteinander verbunden.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173225176
Langlaeufer (2025-10-14 13:38:20+00:00): Ich wüsste nicht, dass es da eine Warnung von ID gibt. Ich vermute mal du hast eine Warnung bekommen, weil ich die highway=platform in highway=footway umgewandelt hatte damit der Fußweg durchgängig ist. 
Als du die dann wieder rausgetrennt hast sind kleine Unangebundene Fußwege zurückgeblieben. hab ich wieder in platform umgewandelt. Jetzt sollte es passen.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-14 00:43:08+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1348460304
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1433133218
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1433134738
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441871522
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441875909

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
gt3400 (2026-05-26 08:21:53+00:00): Ja, der Wegweiser steht nicht genau beim Dianabründl. Das ist bei fast allen ÖTK Wegweisern an Wegknoten so, dass sie nach einem Objekt in der Nähe benannt sind. Dann müssten wir aber bei allen 318 Wegweisern den Zusatz "Wegknoten" ergänzen (eigentlich "Wegpunkt", da der ÖTK sie so nennt).
kuhni74 (2026-05-26 10:37:31+00:00): wäre eigentlich sinnvoll, weil sonst ist es wirklich irreführend