piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ManDay (2023-11-06 07:11:21+00:00): Re helipad roof or not: I admit the semantics are a bit unclear, but if that particular structure doesn't qualify as "a roof", then I couldn't imagine why we do have "building[:part]=roof" at all.

I would say something is a roof IFF it doesn't contain an interior volume, which is the case here.

The fact that there is a helipad (mapped as aeroway=helipad) on that roof is unrelated. It is kind of unique that a building=roof is built solely for the purpose of being walkable, but I think that's the case here.

Re fractional leves: I've seen that done in some other places and it does render correctly on F4Map and Streets.GL iirc. Heights are definitely better, since they are unambiguous, but I don't see anyting wrong with fractional levels. In the code it probably just multiplies that number with some fixed "assumed story height", so it doesn't matter whether it's fractional or not.
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-03 23:35:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 143594900 where the changeset comment is: revert proto-vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-03 23:35:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 143594900 where the changeset comment is: revert proto-vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-03 23:35:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 143594900 where the changeset comment is: revert proto-vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-03 23:35:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 143594900 where the changeset comment is: revert proto-vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-03 23:35:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 143594900 where the changeset comment is: revert proto-vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-03 23:34:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 143594900 where the changeset comment is: revert proto-vandalism
mueschel (2023-11-23 11:19:01+00:00): Hi,
I found a strange "altCapacity" tag on several bicycle parkings. Was this added by mistake or is it supposed to mark the number of hoops?
alexwohlbruck (2023-11-23 14:39:58+00:00): It does mark the number of individual "racks", but I did add this as a metadata field in my app, forgot to remove in the payload request so some of these elements still have the tag. You can remove if you like, it's not needed.
mueschel (2023-11-24 10:15:43+00:00): "bicycle_parking:count" is already used 100 times for this.
alexwohlbruck (2023-11-24 16:20:11+00:00): Should it be something included permanently? I can do that easily, this is the original question asked by the user and the capacity is computed automatically depending on the rack type. Users can also opt to enter capacity manually.
mueschel (2023-11-24 16:30:20+00:00): I guess this is something that can be verified easily and a good tag describing the infrastructure - so very well suited to be in OSM.

But I'm not sure the capacity can be computed automatically: I know places with hoops that are long enough to keep two bicycles on each side. But there are also places where the racks are so close that you can only use them from one side.
alexwohlbruck (2023-11-26 00:50:04+00:00): Users can still enter the capacity manually if they see fit. I should make it clear what the computed capacity will be.
Human1each (2023-11-06 17:07:49+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery, Mapillary
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-04 00:14:27+00:00): Thanks for your work, & welcome to OSM. Two points to mention though. Please don't have your changesets covering such a big area, as it makes it very difficult for other mappers to work out what you've done. & it would also be quite rare for driveways to have a name, especially the same name as the street they're running off?
Wulfmorn (2023-11-05 11:36:44+00:00): Thats actually not so rare, Fizzie. There is quite an overlap between named roads and driveways in Norway - often because of the road imports. In this case however, the name and the driveway was introduced many years ago by other users.
felipeeugenio (2023-11-04 11:30:21+00:00): Hola. Puede por favor dar mas detalles del Jardín Botanico Baoma? no pudimo encontrar nada en internet sobre esto.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143593508
citrula (2023-11-03 22:58:15+00:00): Hi Damian, welcome to OSM! The name of the elementary school should go on the area surrounding the campus, not the buildings themselves. It's perfectly OK for the buildings to not have a name tag. Let me know if you have any questions!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143593733
Damian McKeon (2023-11-03 23:13:43+00:00): Got it!!!  Thanks for the help. I went back and corrected the other ones that I had worked on tonight.  

Cheers,
D.
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-03 23:35:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 143594900 where the changeset comment is: revert proto-vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-03 23:35:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 143594900 where the changeset comment is: revert proto-vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-03 23:35:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 143594900 where the changeset comment is: revert proto-vandalism
map per (2023-11-06 20:20:27+00:00): Hallo andele,

ich hab diese Änderung rückgängig gemacht, weil eine Autobahnraststätte hier keinen Sinn ergibt.

Viele Grüße
map per
ovruni (2023-11-04 00:34:50+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se agregan vias highway=unclassified [0] en zonas donde no hay visible ninguna carretera desde la imagen de Bing . Por otra parte, textos como "correciones Tarma" no dan luces sobre lo que se ha querido corregir aquí. Existe documentación sobre los textos en conjuntos de cambios en la wiki. [1]
Para cualquier consulta sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú existe el grupo de telegram https://t.me/osmPe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-03 23:10:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302764080
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/415241533

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ruboqif (2023-11-04 13:04:53+00:00): Bonjour, Pourquoi changer l'ensemble des ces rues en résidentiel à la place de zone de rencontre (living street) ?
The-Lorax (2023-11-04 14:00:39+00:00): Hello,
Les rues modifiées sont ouvertes à la circulation routière et ne correspondent pas à la définition de  'living street" telles que https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street. Un bon exemple de living à contratio serait la Rue d'Italie.
ruboqif (2023-11-11 15:20:05+00:00): Je ne comprends, toutes les voies sont pourtant bien en zone de rencontre avec les panneaux au début de chaque rues. Et la rue d'Italie elle, elle est en zone piétonne avec le panneau aire pietonne et les bornes d'accès à l'entrée et à la sortie, elle n'est pas en zone de rencontre.
The-Lorax (2023-11-13 14:37:22+00:00): Vous avez raison d'un point de vue technique; les rues que j'ai modifiées sont parfois en zone "zone de rencontre: zone résidentielle mais avec une limite de vitesse plus basse". encore appelées  "zone de circulation apaisée" selon la définition du CEREMA (https://www.cerema.fr/fr/actualites/zones-circulation-apaisee-13-fiches-telecharger). Maintenant, la réalite de ces rue est qu'elles sont des rues résidentielles plus que des zone de rencontre. La Municipalité d'Aix-en=Provence prend quelques libertés avec le bon sens et le code de la route, dans sa volonté d'interdire le centre-ville aux voitures. Exemple, la Rue Suffren classée comme "piétonne" alors qu'elle est ouverte à la circulation sous restrictions, aux riverains, aux services, etc. - ici, détenir le badge pour lever la borne. 

Le WIKi met justement en garde contre les "abus d’interprétation" des municipalités en rappelant que la philosophie de SM est de refléter la réalité (ex: non, la rue Aymeric David, seule pénétrante vers la Place des Prêcheurs n'est pas une "living street" du tout) afin notamment de faciliter les logiciels de routage pour tous les types de véhicules.

Enfin, une comparaison rapide avec le(s) plan(s) IGN montrent que ces voies sont qualifiées à accès restreint. 

Dans toutes ces rues - sauf peut-être la Rue d'Italie, les piétons n'ont aucune priorité sur les véhicules à moteur comme c'est le cas dans les living ou pedestrian streets. Seule la vitesse est abaissée.
Canard164 (2025-02-22 17:14:33+00:00): J’ai ouvert le sujet suivant sur le forum pour discuter de ces points de vue : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/desaccord-sur-les-zones-de-rencontre-et-voies-pietonnes/31578
wlgann (2023-11-07 13:54:53+00:00): I don't think "Living street" is the best tag. These ways are primarily used by foot traffic and should not be routable for vehicles except service vehicles (garbage pickup, groundskeepers, emergency).
Joseph R P (2023-11-07 14:47:57+00:00): Hello, living street in the US is mostly used for roads that are designated to be shared between pedestrians and motor vehicles. If it has not changed since I've been, these roads are publicly open to motor traffic from night to the morning and has a low speed limit for the road to be shared with pedestrians and cyclists. Pedestrian street tagging is used better on a street that is completely blocked to public traffic and only accessible by authorized vehicles, like Merchants Square.
wlgann (2023-11-07 21:38:10+00:00): OK, I can see how that's a fair interpretation. I've added opening_hours tags to the gates on the roads approaching in hopes that vehicles don't get routed into the Historic Area during pedestrian-only hours, and will look into a way to better designate when general vehicle access is permitted.
Joseph R P (2023-11-08 01:58:31+00:00): Good move. I'm sure there's a way to add proper tagging to the roads themselves to indicate when they are accessible to motor vehicles, but I wouldn't know of it.
wlgann (2023-11-08 15:37:41+00:00): I did some further research. "Living Street" does not appear in the guidelines for Virginia road classifications at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Virginia/Highway_classification
However I agree that it's a better tag than any others. I did add conditional restrictions for motor vehicles where appropriate according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions
Joseph R P (2023-11-08 21:23:38+00:00): As the creator of that page, I didn't take living streets into consideration at the time due to how little of these roads there were in the state. They do seem to be on the rise however in more urbanized areas, so I'll add a section regarding them to the draft at some point.
wlgann (2023-11-09 19:52:11+00:00): Awesome. Pleasure working with you.
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-03 23:35:33+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 143450147, 143450148, 143502222, 143502223, 143502225, 143502226, 143502227, 143592927, 143592928, 143592929, 143592930, 143592931, 143592932, 143592933, 143592934, 143592936, 143592937, 143592938, 143593939, 143593940, 143593941, 143593943, 143593945, 143593946, 143593947, 143593948, 143593949, 143593950, 143593951, 143593952, 143593953, 143593954, 143593955, 143593956, 143593957.
Matt_ (2023-11-03 23:49:27+00:00): Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_National_Inventory_of_Dams
dzamper (2023-11-04 07:05:08+00:00): Możesz przybliżyć co rozumiesz przez „Usunięte niemożliwe relacje”? Bo jedyne co widzę w tym zestawie zmian to popsucie relacji zakazów skrętów i zostawienie ich w takim stanie :/
Mariusz Dykierek (2023-11-04 09:30:37+00:00): Osmose oznaczyło te miejsca jako niemożliwe restrykcje ze względu na jednokierunkowość tych ulic. Np.relacja  7614158-był zakaz w lewo w zjazd. Opisana była tak: Node 974064180 as via Way 83644293 as to. Żeby w nią w lewo skręcić (w zasadzie to U-turn) to trzeba DTŚ jechać pod prąd. Zmiana sprzed 5 lat od Yanosikia, więc na 99% tam były jakieś roboty i ten odcinek był dwukierunkowy. Nie zostało to posprzątane po zakończeniu? Widzę jednak, że te relacje nie do końca udało się usunąć bo zostały szczątki. Dokończę to. Czy jeszcze coś przeoczyłem?
dzamper (2023-11-04 15:54:22+00:00): Jasne, wszystko słusznie, zastanawiało mnie tylko skąd te pozostawione szczątki relacji. Czy coś jeszcze zostało to niestety nie wiem bo aż tak szczegółowo nie sprawdzałem.
Mariusz Dykierek (2023-11-04 17:53:35+00:00): Dokończone, wyczyszczone (prawie na pewno).
habi (2023-11-21 13:38:55+00:00): Ciao MappSurfer
Das Fussballfeld https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1220644304 welches du eingezeichnet hast, existierte schon als https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51727777/
Ich habe die 'neuen' Tags aufs alte verlegt und das neue Fussballfeld gelöscht.
Gruss, habi
MappSurfer (2023-11-24 18:28:12+00:00): Hallo habi

Danke für deinen Hinweis
Da habt JOSM das bereits existierende Fussballfeld nicht heruntergeladen, da ich nicht das ganze Gebiet heruntergeladen habe.

Danke für die Korrektur

Liebe Grüsse
MappSurfer
habi (2023-11-25 17:52:17+00:00): Kein Problem, das gibts mängisch.
Für JOSM gibt's https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/continuosDownload, das Plugin kann helfen, indem es Daten runterlädt, wenn mensch rumscrollt.
Ist aber mängisch nicht uu gäbig, wenn mensch weit rauszoomt.
Supaplex030 (2023-11-06 20:39:15+00:00): Hallo Weasel-Wiesel, danke für deine Änderungen. Ich habe eine Änderung an einem Parkplatz hier rückgängig gemacht: An diesem Parkplatz (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/860595439) hast du "parking=street_side" statt "parking=surface" gesetzt. "parking=street_side" ist aber für Parkbuchten gedacht, die direkt vom Straßennetz ohne Zufahrt aus erreicht werden. Hier handelt es sich aber um einen Parkplatz abseits des Straßenraums, der durch eine Grundstückszufahrt erschlossen ist, also "parking=surface".

Beste Grüße
Alex
jtracey (2023-11-05 18:01:30+00:00): Okay, so unfortunately, we're not allowed to copy information from other maps, nor Wikipedia:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ#Can_I_trace_data_from_Google_Maps/Nokia_Maps/...?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Collaboration_with_Wikipedia#Geodata_import/exports_with_Wikimedia_projects

This is a bit of an unusual circumstance in that the map from Chicopee is pretty abstract, but it would still be preferred if this information came from elsewhere (in any case, the Wikipedia information is definitely not allowed). Are you familiar with Chicopee? If I were to revert this edit, could you add back the information in question from memory?
helmi03 (2023-11-04 03:30:15+00:00): GPS Traces:

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/helmi03/traces/11159756
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/helmi03/traces/11159742
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/helmi03/traces/11159737
AkuAnakTimur (2023-11-05 12:46:47+00:00): Padu!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-04 04:20:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11311117033
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103801816

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11311117037
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11311117038
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11311117039

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ovruni (2023-11-04 06:44:36+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se agregó una vía con diferente sentido en la Avenida Bicentenario, sin embargo se deben poner como vías separadas cuando las vías están separadas físicamente. En caso de que algunos carriles tengan un sentido y otros carriles otro sentido se puede especificar el número de carriles de cada lado mediante lanes:forward y lanes:backward. [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:lanes#Ejemplos
Leonar25 (2023-11-05 03:20:06+00:00): Hola.
¿Por qué se eliminaron los pasillos de estacionamiento que estaban en el carril derecho de la Avenida Bicentenario?
ovruni (2023-11-05 04:10:09+00:00): Hola Leonar25 , de manera similar a lo que he escrito arriba, se deben de agregar vías diferentes cuando existen vías que se encuentran separadas físicamente, no cuando existe un ensanchado en alguna parte de la vía.
Saludos
ovruni (2023-11-05 06:44:59+00:00): En el caso de estacionamientos en un carril de la vía y en una parte se puede poner la etiqueta parking:street_side (left, right o both según la dirección de la vía) en la sección donde haya un lado para estacionamiento, en la documentación sobre estacionamientos en calles se puede encontrar mayor detalle https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking
Saludos
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-04 05:10:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11311077665
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11311077666

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Olaf der Mapper (2023-11-11 13:56:51+00:00): LOL
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-14 04:15:35+00:00): In lieu of mapping every tree in a forest as individual nodes, you should use an natural=woods.  You can read more about this tag here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwood
OldManCelli (2023-11-09 14:30:26+00:00): It looks like this changeset broke r15902942 and deleted r7708530. Can you please provide source to your changes (just wondering why are you deleting this relation?) and correct the broken relation?
Ganeshan Sashika (2023-11-12 18:20:13+00:00): okay I will check it.
ChromeLotus (2023-11-16 20:23:30+00:00): Hello ItsDurian, thank you for contributions to OSM! I see you recently removed construction tags from a large portion of the West Coast Expressway. However, checking all satellite imageries, including Maxar SecureWatch from 2023-09-15, construction appears to be unfinished. Construction in this area is not expected to open until March 2024 (https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2023/09/01/four-sections-of-west-coast-expressway-expected-to-be-ready-by-march-2024/88434). Given this, consistent with OSM definition on tag:highway=construction (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction), some of the features modified through one of your previous changesets were changed back to construction. Feel free to reach out for any further questions!
ItsDurian (2023-11-17 03:04:25+00:00): Hi, the edit I made was based on this quite recent video: https://youtu.be/Ue1MxSrrAME?si=9mciaBNbg9j-Ng-F showing this stretch is fully completed just waiting to be opened, scheduled end of this year (for this Section 6: https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2023/07/935153/section-6-west-coast-expressway-be-completed-year-end). 

My edit also does not open the roads that connect to the not opened section yet, only the highway itself and its exits making sure people will not be routed yet into the unopened highway.

Hope this can clarify and my edits can be changed back. Thanks.
ChromeLotus (2023-11-17 21:53:21+00:00): Hello ItsDurian, thank you for the timely response. I acknowledge that some sections of the West Coast Expressway appear completed but are not opened, and leaving its connecting segments as construction would not allow routing. According to the OSM wiki’s definition of construction, however, construction tags would be appropriately replaced when roads are ‘already opened and passable’. Removing construction tags prematurely may create adverse effects. For instance, i) such modeling may create inconsistencies in OSM cartography and false impressions for users that roads are drivable, and ii) users that download offline data may be negatively impacted; there is a section detailing this on the OSM Good Practice Page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features). If it is feasible, I would recommend applying additional tags, such as check_date=* and opening_date=*, detailing the progression of the construction project if the roads are not opened. I look forward to hearing back from you!
AkuAnakTimur (2023-11-18 02:05:28+00:00): Pardon the interruption: have you obtained any permission (from the video owner) to exploit the video for all intents and purposes to improve OpenStreetMap?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright#trademarks
ItsDurian (2023-11-20 08:52:17+00:00): Hi. Thanks for the comment on my edit,  ChromeLotus. This section will be opened from 21 Nov 2023 onwards.

https://www.careta.my/article/lebuhraya-wce-seksyen-6-kini-dibuka-secara-rasmi-tol-percuma-hingga-2-januari-2024
lefuturiste (2023-11-04 11:22:33+00:00): Great, that's better clustering
Kovoschiz (2023-11-04 07:25:08+00:00): Again please don't blindly follow edit suggestions. Adding `layer=` to `amenity=shelter` doesn't make sense. For `building=roof` , It is enough to make the `=footway` as ` covered=yes` , but here  the `footway=sidewalk` should be aligned around it.
nevw (2023-11-04 10:20:18+00:00): Hi, you have entered the Steel Blue site twice in different places along the same street. Can you decide where the business is located and leave the details on the one correct node.
You accidentally removed the tag highway=residential from Irvine Street but I have fixed it.
nevw (2023-11-04 10:31:34+00:00): You need to add a primary tag so osm can properly process your business details and render in the map…is office=company ok or do you prefer a more specific tag?
Kovoschiz (2023-11-04 07:11:08+00:00): Please don't attach bus stops to sidewalks. This doesn't represent the physical position, and makes editing complicated.
zstadler (2023-11-04 07:52:31+00:00): שלום תומר,

תודה רבה על העידכונים שאתה מעלה למפה

כפי שכנראה אתה יודע, המפה של ישראל עברה מתקפה זדונית והשיחזור שלה עדיין לא הסתיים

קח בחשבון שבמהלך השיחזור עלולות להמחק גם עריכות לגיטימיות

ראה את השירשור
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vandalism-and-blocks-in-israel/105176  
למעקב אחרי התקדמות השיחזור

Hello TomerVromen, 

Thank you for updating the map.

As you probably know, the OSM map in Israel was subject to a vandalism attack. The recovery from. the attack is still on going.

Note that some legitimate edits made during the recovery period will be removed in the process.

See
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vandalism-and-blocks-in-israel/105176
for the latest updates on the recovery
zstadler (2023-11-04 07:55:01+00:00): שלום יניב,

תודה רבה על העידכונים שאתה מעלה למפה

כפי שכנראה אתה יודע, המפה של ישראל עברה מתקפה זדונית והשיחזור שלה עדיין לא הסתיים

קח בחשבון שבמהלך השיחזור עלולות להמחק גם עריכות לגיטימיות

ראה את השירשור
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vandalism-and-blocks-in-israel/105176  
למעקב אחרי התקדמות השיחזור

Hello Yanivdu, 

Thank you for updating the map.

As you probably know, the OSM map in Israel was subject to a vandalism attack. The recovery from. the attack is still on going.

Note that some legitimate edits made during the recovery period will be removed in the process.

See
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vandalism-and-blocks-in-israel/105176
for the latest updates on the recovery
cserpell (2023-11-04 13:24:24+00:00): Hola, me parece muy raro 57 como ancho, 57 metros!! ¿Cuántos metros quisiste decir?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143600352
WilliamHarrison (2023-11-04 06:55:05+00:00): added stop signs & turn lane information*