piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2026-05-08 19:38:59+00:00): Removed redundant windsocks.
Greetz,
eggie
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-09 07:00:20+00:00): Guten Morgen Mecklenburgische Seenplatte, willkommen bei OSM.

Was genau kann ich mir hier mit der "Überarbeitung Campingpark Kamerun" vorstellen?

Danke und Grüße
Mecklenburgische Seenplatte (2026-05-09 16:11:54+00:00): Die Überarbeitung betraf Zufahrtsstraßen zum Campingpark "Kamerun". Ich habe es aus der Dropdown-Liste ausgewählt, da ich es wohl bereits vorher als CS-Zusammenfassung benutzt habe. Ich habe lediglich Straßenknoten korrigiert und die Linien kurviger geformt.
eggie (2026-05-08 19:27:48+00:00): Hoi,

Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.

MVG
eggie
Szymson (2026-05-22 19:27:32+00:00): Zła kategoria, zobacz jak to wygląda tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/52.278891/20.977079
Szymson (2026-05-22 19:31:54+00:00): A i relacje wypadałoby dostosować do nowej sytuacji.
Szymson (2026-05-22 19:38:11+00:00): Poza tym przystanek w kierunku S7 nie ma separatora, dodawanie dodatkowej jezdni w tym miejscu jest błędem.
VigilantPenguin (2026-05-08 18:40:55+00:00): Oh, the node has place=suburb, but the relation itself has place=neighbourhood for some reason. Those should probably match, but the whole city is kind of wonky in terms of neighborhood boundaries, so I'm leaving that lie for now.
eggie (2026-05-08 19:25:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
isotopicemoting (2026-05-08 18:46:33+00:00): Oops, Changeset-Kommentar vergessen. "Treffpunkt Drütter Linde"
TheGPAdventurer_import (2026-06-12 17:04:54+00:00): Pozdravljen, 
To ni pravi zemljevid za izmišljena imena, obstaja tudi zemljevid za to (https://opengeofiction.net/). Če se motim, in je to dejansko ime Občine Mengeš (in vseh ostalih imen ulic iz prejšnih changesetov) mi prosim sporoči, da ne spremenim dejanskih informacij.
JanezPavelZebovec (2026-07-09 19:30:23+00:00): These edits do not meet OSM mapping standards and constitute obvious vandalism. They include one or more of these: incorrect street names, incorrect road classifications, and other intentionally disruptive edits. They are therefore being reverted.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-08 19:11:30+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1510603004

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
JanezPavelZebovec (2026-07-09 19:31:42+00:00): These edits do not meet OSM mapping standards and constitute obvious vandalism. They include one or more of these: incorrect street names, incorrect road classifications, and other intentionally disruptive edits. They are therefore being reverted.
statelyelms (2026-05-08 19:00:59+00:00): Remember, proper nouns (names) are not translatable unless there is an official option, and common names should reflect the most common name or language, or a compromise (in Fton we see this on the signs, with capitalisation of french titles debatable). Not what you personally use! Saint Mary's is the name of the street, not literally 'owned by a saint named Mary' so it's not translatable to 'rue de Sainte Marie'.
citrula (2026-05-11 04:02:53+00:00): This edit looks good to me.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182397552
Branko Kokanovic (2026-05-08 20:06:40+00:00): Vidim da si dugo na OSM-u, ali ne znam odakle ti ovaj način mapiranja, da praviš relacije za landuse, i onda sve to lepiš na puteve? Na wikiju nigde ne vidim da je to dozvoljeno, a dosta nam pravi to problema po Srbiji. Adrese ne mogu da se vežu na zgrade, kada su zgrade relacije iseckane na gomilu way-ova. Imali smo problema kada smo radili sređivanje admin boundary-ja gde su putevi bili slepljeni za admin boundaryje, pa smo jedva to odlepili, a tamo gde nismo smo greškom ispomerali puteve. 

Inače, zajednica je na forumu https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/rs/64, a ima nas i na Telegram grupi https://t.me/osm_sr, pa svrni.
CartographerC (2026-05-19 19:06:36+00:00): Извињавам се за лепљење на путеве, видео сам то на много места. Слажем се да landuse може бити одвојено од свега осталог.

Што се тиче адреса, па цела кућа је на адреси. Не знам одакле прецизне координате за кућне бројеве, али у катастру је број додељен згради, не прецизној тачки. Тј. цела зграда има кућни број, не само једна тачка унутар зграде ...
CartographerC (2026-05-19 19:10:54+00:00): На пример,  адреса куће је на кући, не као тачка унутар куће:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1151088206
CartographerC (2026-05-19 19:12:19+00:00): О, па ти си то урадио пре три године :)
Branko Kokanovic (2026-05-24 22:22:05+00:00): Mislim da lepljenje landuse-a nije nešto što treba da se radi jer 1) nije dokumentovano, 2) wiki kaže da je zabranjeno stavljati ga na relacije (npr. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=farmland) i 3) prosto je jako komplikovano za sve koji dođu posle tebe da se snađu, da edituju, a da ne pričam o podršci editora za ove zalepljene stvari.

> Извињавам се за лепљење на путеве, видео сам то на много места.

Ako imaš negde gde si video da se ovako stvari lepe (landuse-ovi, building), možeš li da ih navedeš ovde? Razmišljam da pitam na forumu ceo hivemind šta misli o ovom tagovanju jer meni ne deluje da treba tako da radimo, ali bih da proverim sa svima (pa još primera ne škodi).

> Не знам одакле прецизне координате за кућне бројеве

Što se tiče adresa, sve su na https://dina.openstreetmap.rs/, mesečni izveštaj iz RGZ-a (imamo adresni registar - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sr:Serbia/Projekti/Adresni_registar) i imamo pravilo kako se taguju adrese: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Serbia/Addresses. Kao što vidiš, adrese treba da budu na wayu zgrade i jako je lako prebaciti adresu kroz JOSM sa jednim shortcutom, ali ako je kuća relacija koja je sastavljena od gomile rasparčanih puteva - to je nemoguće (da se vratim na to da nijedan editor ne podržava tvoj način tagovanja).
CartographerC (2026-05-25 00:23:45+00:00): Што се тиче лепљења landuse на путеве, сећам се да сам виђао раније негде по Немачкој, али не могу да нађем пример на брзину. Колико видим, у праву си за то. 

Што се тиче зграда, мислио сам да треба избегавати вишеструке линије које су физички исте. Зид између две зграде које се наслањају једна на другу је један зид. 

Схватам да се може свака зграда посебно мапирати као посебан полигон, и онда заједнички зид би се јављао два пут, једном као део леве зграде, једном као део десне зграде.

Ако имам way који представља кућу, и исечем део њега да буде зид друге куће, онда се прва кућа претвори у мултиполигон. Нисам знао да то прави проблеме са таговањем (тагови остају на мултиполигону, и уосталом стварно постоје зграде које се морају представити као мултиполигон [нпр. зграда са рупом у средини], тако да рендерери, навигатори морају већ то поштовати.
CartographerC (2026-05-25 00:25:53+00:00): > ali ako je kuća relacija koja je sastavljena od gomile rasparčanih puteva - to je nemoguće

Очигледно је могуће, јер ми куће у Корбову изгледају коректно, и навигација ради.

Што се тиче едитора, сваки едитор подржава постављање тагова на мултиполигоне (куће су постале мултиполигони, не релације у најширем смислу)
Branko Kokanovic (2026-05-25 14:18:59+00:00): Ne, moguće je naravno, ja sam više komentarisao kako je nemoguće to uradili lagano, jednim Ctrl+W shortcutom.

> Што се тиче зграда, мислио сам да треба избегавати вишеструке линије које су физички исте.

Ako te dobro razumem, mislim da je ovo osnovna (i jedina) premisa koja nije tačna i na koju gradiš sve ostale pretpostavke. Sve zgrade u Beogradu (pa verovanto i u Srbiji) imaju deljene linije, npr. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204171782 ili u Americi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363046817. Osim tvojih zgrada, ja ne vidim da iko izbegava duple linije. Ako se sećaš gde si ovo video, ili daš neki primer ko ovo još ovako radi - ja bih prvi naučio nešto novo:) Ali i dalje mislim da ovakav način mapiranja dosta zagorčava život onima koji idu posle tebe
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 09:46:41+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, possibly sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184128480

https://osm.org/changeset/184128480
aixbrick (2026-05-09 10:41:09+00:00): Hello,
just a small hint: It seems that you use the osm-fr instance. That instance allows hosting of pictures taken outside of france only for testing purposes, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Panoramax#Services and https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/osm-fr-panoramax-server-only-for-testing-if-outside-of-france/143428. In the extreme case those pictures could be deleted some day..
Regards
olo81 (2026-05-08 20:59:56+00:00): Nazwa opisowa do poprawy.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
melody_Tej (2026-06-23 16:05:13+00:00): Hello Raaiba, Thank You for your contribution. There was validation errors in your changeset related to building and highway crossing (w/358005558,  w/358005148, w/120232020), I have fixed that. Instepct your task carefully before closing, please. Happy Mapping!
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-08 20:16:11+00:00): #Vandalism
mtmail (2026-05-08 20:27:01+00:00): I reverted the changeset (in changeset 182400074)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-05-08 21:11:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 182401510 where the changeset comment is: Revering some childish vandalism in Germany
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-08 20:10:38+00:00): #Vandalism
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-05-08 21:08:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 182401416 where the changeset comment is: Revering some childish vandalism in Germany
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-08 20:11:13+00:00): #Vandalism
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-05-08 21:08:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 182401416 where the changeset comment is: Revering some childish vandalism in Germany
mariotomo (2026-05-11 11:45:29+00:00): Hola, en casos así, lo mejor sería quitar las etiquetas del edificio, y añadir tantos nodos cuantas las actividades que se desarrollan en el edificio.
Tomas09 (2026-05-22 11:01:17+00:00): This is a terrible changeset comment. Is this something caused by the editor or of your own fault?
CRCulver (2026-05-15 11:51:20+00:00): Why did you delete the religion= and denomination= tags from this area?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1196334317/history
Hung Tran 9x0 (2026-06-06 12:15:32+00:00): Tôi không hiểu sao bạn lại xóa lối đi bộ trên cầu Long Biên. Lối đi bộ tách biệt với đường cho xe đi, không dùng chung nên bạn xóa thế là không chính xác.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-05-08 21:08:28+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 182399378, 182399436.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-05-08 21:12:00+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 182398428.
Nic Reich (2026-07-31 04:29:27+00:00): FYI this changeset incorrectly marks some paths as crossings.  I've fixed it now.
eggie (2026-05-09 06:29:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
jptolosa (2026-05-09 01:19:48+00:00): Hola, en el recorrido 105c pareciera que utilizaste la misma relación para el recorrido de ida y de vuelta. Deben ser una relación para el recorrido de ida, una distinta para el recorrido de vuelta y otra relación maestra que agrupe los recorrido de ida y vuelta. Se recomienda el editor JOSM para construir los recorridos de buses sin errores.
Saludos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182401911
QuiLe (2026-05-08 22:04:54+00:00): Reverted due to vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182402646
schobbish (2026-05-09 03:57:04+00:00): Reverted in changeset 182407852
schobbish (2026-05-09 03:57:25+00:00): Reverted in changeset 182407852
schobbish (2026-05-09 03:57:40+00:00): Reverted in changeset 182407852
schobbish (2026-05-09 03:57:58+00:00): Reverted in changeset 182407852
schobbish (2026-05-09 03:58:04+00:00): Reverted in changeset 182407852
schobbish (2026-05-09 03:58:11+00:00): Reverted in changeset 182407852
NieWnen (2026-06-26 17:35:49+00:00): Warto zamykać powiązane uwagi i linkować do nich zestaw zmian.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5062577
schobbish (2026-05-09 03:58:17+00:00): Reverted in changeset 182407852
IvaKraljić (2026-05-08 22:24:43+00:00): The wrongly tagged segment has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182403024#map=17/39.028986/-95.777021. #OptimoRoute
schobbish (2026-05-09 03:58:25+00:00): Reverted in changeset 182407852
marcmarti (2026-05-15 07:44:05+00:00): Hola Ivan, recorda que les parades de bus tenen dos components:
 
-El punt de parada, amb: 
bus=yes
public_transport=stop_position
no té etiqueta highway

-La marquesina, amb:
bus=yes
highway=bus_stop
public_transport=platform

Ho dic perque veig que hi havien parades etiquetades correctament i que has canviat.

Salut, Marc
ivanruiz (2026-05-15 10:40:45+00:00): Bon dia Marc,

Tens tota la raó i ho tindré en compte en futures edicions. Intentaré corregir les que vaig etiquetar de manera errònia.

Moltes gràcies i salutacions.
VictorIE (2026-05-09 20:45:01+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1124882627/

Did you see the 2025 images from 
Esri World Imagery?
MacLondon (2026-05-10 10:45:26+00:00): Thanks. I've now done some rough realignments based of the imagery.
schobbish (2026-05-09 03:58:31+00:00): Reverted in changeset 182407852
schobbish (2026-05-09 03:58:35+00:00): Reverted in changeset 182407852
schobbish (2026-05-09 03:58:39+00:00): Reverted in changeset 182407852
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-09 04:11:31+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20263
ntzm (2026-05-10 15:29:48+00:00): Hi, these are not crossing=informal. I have updated them to be correct. I'm not sure what streetcomplete is asking here but please double check in the future!
bxl-forever (2026-05-09 07:54:19+00:00): Hello,

I want to alert you of a possible problem with this series of edits.

The large building on Avenue de Bâle - Bazellaan nbr 8 was already on the map, though the shape was outdated.  The recommended way is to rectify the shape of the existing one.  Importing a new one on top of the existing one, making two grossly overlapping buildings on the same location and with the same address, is plainly incorrect.

Is it possible that some of your edits are scripted?  Maybe they are unable to detect existing buildings if the shape differs by a significant factor?  I wanted to alert you about this, because I found the same pattern in many edits in the past weeks.

Thanks.
CouscousMerguez (2026-05-12 20:18:05+00:00): I don't remember importing this building with a database... I used the Urbis Data strait from JOSM. 
I will reshape buidling instead of reimporting them in the future. Thanks for the message
Adikso (2026-05-09 13:06:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182424044 SEO z nazwy i opisu zostało usunięte.
andershl (2026-06-01 19:08:24+00:00): Hvorfor har den det mærkelige navn (det efter bindestregen): Autocamperplads Oasen Rømø – 2 (29-218)
Bondi Maps (2026-05-09 02:35:29+00:00): Qué actualizaste específicamente?
user_5359 (2026-05-10 15:30:53+00:00): Hello! What is the mean of the tag mdcad_unic_id? If this is a local reference, please use ref:MD:cad_unic_id
Moldovan_Merkator (2026-05-20 01:38:12+00:00): hi, that's an unique id of every address point in moldovan cadastre, i added it because in that way it will be easier to fetch semi-automatically if there are some changes for this address, for example its name, address number location was changed. Yeah, you're right, it will be better and more correct to add ref:, i fixed that.
crushtheserpent (2026-05-14 06:06:47+00:00): I think it's best to keep buildings with a demolished tag in OpenStreetMap while they appear in any of the available satellite imagery, rather than deleting them. Keeping buildings with a demolished tag in OSM may help prevent another user from adding demolished buildings because they appear in available satellite imagery.
marcmarti (2026-05-09 08:50:59+00:00): Técnicamente es "Carrer de Miquel Biada" ya que todas las calles en Catalunya llevan preposición jaja
Sammyhawkrad (2026-05-10 21:37:52+00:00): Did you intend to add Agogowa as a name? natural=Agogowa is not a valid tag.
Sammyhawkrad (2026-05-10 21:29:35+00:00): Hi kwarko27, in OSM name=* is the name only. Location is not part of the name.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Thus, the name will be restored to the previous version.
旧加卷 (2026-05-09 07:06:43+00:00): Why are you adding addr:place=中国 and postal codes of Dandong in Sinuiju?
Sanniu (2026-05-10 12:47:48+00:00): Hi, website category is for object website.
If you want to add link to the article about the place, add it into description field.
dima monsky (2026-05-10 13:29:51+00:00): Hi Sanniu , thank You for the help, corrected)
Kai Johnson (2026-05-09 17:01:50+00:00): Good catch!
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-05-09 03:41:17+00:00): Vespucci bị lỗi, bổ sung lại là nâng cấp tag lên primary ở 1 đoạn đường nghi là QL.4A
schobbish (2026-05-09 03:59:50+00:00): uid is 24104707
旧加卷 (2026-05-12 05:01:03+00:00): highway=services 不是公路
SD Mapman (2026-05-10 01:45:05+00:00): This is blatantly incorrect. Please revise.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-10 05:11:07+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20267
TheSwavu (2026-05-10 05:58:09+00:00): Hi,

Roundabout such as w1510796777 need to have a junction=roundabout tag.

I have fixed this one.

Thanks.
felipeeugenio (2026-05-10 14:52:04+00:00): Hola Sofía. Puedes cuadrar las casas con la letra Q. estas que agregaste están todas chuecas. Voy a intentar arreglarlas

Respecto del boque, por favor darse unos minutos en dibujar algo con un poco mas de detalle, Es fácil ver que un porcentaje importante del boque que agregaste, no es un bosque. Hay otros elementos naturales para agregar, como scrub en este caso. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:natural)

Voy a intentar arreglarlo, pero por favor no hacer dibujos esquemáticos.
felipeeugenio (2026-05-10 14:53:40+00:00): otro tema: hay muchas casas que se nota que son separadas, pero las uniste. Por favor; aunque estén pegadas, siguen siendo dos construcciones separadas y hay que dibujarlas como tal.

saludos
TheNatBoi (2026-05-09 05:34:12+00:00): oops forgot to upload btwn tasks. bit of a big bounding box
eggie (2026-05-09 06:39:34+00:00): Dag Willem,

Mooi die staat er op.
Ik heb de info verplaatst naar een adresnode en garage toegevoegd. Je ziet anders niets.
CTRL F5 om de rendering te versnellen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-05-09 06:32:12+00:00): Dag Willem, In het vervolg graag de adresnode intact laten.

MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-09 06:11:10+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268907236

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2026-05-14 13:32:16+00:00): poprawiono
Glassman (2026-05-10 01:17:06+00:00): It appears you dragged a node off the house. I fixed it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182410008
felipeeugenio (2026-05-10 14:46:59+00:00): Hola. Por favor no agregar información privada.
Bruno Duyé (2026-05-19 13:29:12+00:00): C'est nul
TrickyFoxy (2026-05-11 23:51:27+00:00): 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-20 01:01:24+00:00): Hi,

If you're going to add businesses to OSM for your clients, you have an obligation (to both your client and to us) to at least make every reasonable effort to use correct tags and values. Most of the tags added here are used incorrectly, many of them being essentially nonsense, which both pollutes the map with junk data and means they will not be intelligible to data consumers reading the map, defeating the purpose of your efforts here.

It's not that hard to use iD's beginner-friendly presets to fill in this information correctly, or spend a few minutes reading the wiki on how to format your tags properly. After all, you are being _paid_ to do this properly for your client.

I removed or fixed the incorrect tags here in changeset 182903398 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182903398

Thanks.
bxl-forever (2026-05-28 12:24:36+00:00): Hello,

I came across your profile when repairing a few edits that have the same problem.  I felt I had to tell you, to give you a chance to improve.

Drawing parking areas is a good idea.  But please do not glue them on existing roads.  Instead, try to draw the area as accurately as possible, which should stay away from the existing roads. Cleaning such mistakes is a considerable time-waster for others, so it’s better to learn to do it correctly from the first time.

Thanks in advance.
LordGarySugar (2026-07-04 22:13:39+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding these buildings. As these are all semidetached buildings, it would be preferable if they would be split along their property boundaries rather than merged together like this. Thanks.
BCNorwich (2026-05-10 05:58:32+00:00): Hi, Several of your footways were duplicated, crossing, and/or unjoined. I think I've corrected the problems.

Regards Bernard.
RahilPasha (2026-05-12 05:22:49+00:00): Hii BCNorwich ,
Hi, thank you for catching that! It looks like a segment was accidentally uploaded without being properly snapped to the existing road network. I still see node is not connected, I will connect this node and ensure the routing is continuous. Thanks for the feedback!
VictorIE (2026-05-13 05:04:04+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for your contributions.

Mappers have been asked to try to restrict changesets to a single country if possible. Lock Lomond to County Mayo is pushing things a little. :)
SCMapper9947 (2026-05-17 08:46:38+00:00): Sorry, I must not have noticed. I wouldn't normally do things like that
literan (2026-05-09 10:33:42+00:00): сомневаюсь, что здесь адреска по микрорайону. На Яндексе совсем другие адреса, общие у домов. Исправьте, пожалуйста
Ozon OSM9 (2026-05-09 18:55:34+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за комментарий. Исправила, указала единый адрес для дома. Дело в том, что кадастру дом разделён на несколько участков, по этому разбила адрес на несколько точек согласно этим данным и тип объекта в OSM указан как "Ряд городских домов".
literan (2026-05-09 10:13:43+00:00): адреса на дверях не нужны. Адрес это свойство здания, а не его составных частей
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-20 01:08:09+00:00): Reverted due to being added by known SEO spammer missing any useful top-level tags.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182903525
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-20 01:08:19+00:00): Hi,

If you're going to add businesses to OSM for your clients, you have an obligation (to both your client and to us) to at least make every reasonable effort to use correct tags and values. This POI is missing any top-level tags, which means they will not be intelligible to data consumers reading the map, defeating the purpose of your efforts here.

It's not that hard to use iD's beginner-friendly presets to fill in this information correctly, or spend a few minutes reading the wiki on how to format your tags properly. After all, you are being _paid_ to do this properly for your client.

I've gone ahead and reverted this change. If you attempt to make it again, please take care to do so correctly.

Thanks.
小智智 (2026-07-19 23:31:33+00:00): You have damaged a lot of underground corridors in the tube station. Please don't do that anymore.
Aparna Manjery (2026-07-21 09:41:53+00:00): Hi, 
I acknowledge and thank you for the feedback.