piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Bezetha (2026-04-02 10:05:52+00:00): Hello all.
I admit not being aware to this route importance to other users.  I apologize and will understand it's recovery.

I also feel the need to explain the reasons for editing should you see fit to read:
'Nahal Nekarot' bike trail followed the main marked trail at the same geographical corridor, creating unnecessary routs clutter, confusing foot hikers and holds no actual benefit to bikers whom would ride where they see fit as thy go regardless.
The main 'Double' marked trail is sufficient for every navigation (foot, bike or car), mapping every single variation in the same corridor will lead to endless overflowing process.

The disconnections were made by mistake and i have tried edit again and reconnect them.
zstadler (2026-04-02 11:51:22+00:00): Hello Bezetha,

Thank you for responding.

OSM is about "truth on the ground", and the troth is that there is a parallel bike trail that is trying to avoid the gravel road.

We are not to judge if the gravel road is "sufficient for every navigation (foot, bike or car)". 
Someone made a deliberate significant effort to create this bike trail.
Moreover, mapping of bike lanes is common practice in cities. No one should delete them because the street is "sufficient for every navigation (foot, bike or car)". 
Please refrain from deleting the maping efforts dne by others, as long s it represents that truth on the ground.

For consulting and discussions with other mappers in Israel, please join the OSM Israel Telegram channel https://t.me/OSM_Israel or post in the Israel Community forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/il/50

Please do not attempt to partially correct such edits. This only increases the complexity of restoring the deleted mapping by experienced mappers.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
iandees (2026-03-25 20:38:29+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9241029360 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180426753, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Comino (2026-03-25 21:24:47+00:00): Please do not add codes in the name-tag (not allowed).

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
Langlaeufer (2026-04-24 09:44:20+00:00): Hast du diese Wege vor Ort gepürft? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1492868588/history
Sieht mir auf den Luftbildern nämlich nicht so aus, als ob die permanent sind?
osmmapper222 (2026-04-24 19:36:30+00:00): Die Änderungen in Gestorf basieren auf Luftbildern, Mapillary-Aufnahmen und dem ALKIS. Vor Ort war ich nicht.

Auf den DOP20-Bildern sieht man, dass die Feldwege in der Tat temporärer Natur waren. Deshalb habe ich die Wege wieder herausgenommen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181780971
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
tomhukins (2026-03-26 18:15:44+00:00): Again, thank you for your work on the map, but it's hard for me to understand what you have done here.  The description "minors" says nothing useful, but it looks like you have modified various different types of feature, but I don't know why.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Hans Thompson (2026-03-26 15:22:49+00:00): good edit
Nadjita (2026-03-27 21:54:54+00:00): Moin!
Ich halte es nicht für besonders sinnvoll, Straßensperrungen von nur wenigen Tagen in OSM zu erfassen. In der Regel mache ich das nur, wenn es einen Monat oder länger ist, weil die Verarbeitung der Daten immer hinterher hängt und solche temporären Sperrungen meist erst dann in den Kartendaten oder den Routern landen, wenn sie bereits wieder aufgehoben wurden.
Nadjita (2026-03-27 21:58:56+00:00): Ach ja: Abgesehen davon war die Benutzung des Gehweges die ganze Zeit über möglich gewesen, da wäre dann ein vehicle:conditional=* wohl sinnvoller. Aber ist jetzt auch egal irgendwie.
literan (2026-03-26 19:12:39+00:00): приветствую. вы накрыли полигонами газона сразу и автодороги, и пешеходные дорожки. Очевидно, что на них трава не растет, поэтому я отменю эти действия. Попробуйте нарисовать газоны точнее
crushtheserpent (2026-03-25 20:15:40+00:00): My GPS trace was made by driving through on the left lane where there are 2 lanes, then in the through lane where there are three/four lanes. My edits are a better way to represent the geometry of the motorway exit than showing a line that turns sharply right.
Dimitar155 (2026-04-07 20:12:12+00:00): Hi NGlf,

I think that network=electrip is redundant when brand=* is already present. Would you mind if I clear it up?

There is a NSI preset for electrip which adds brand:wikidata. Also keep in mind that it is spelt with lowercase e (see their logo on their website for reference).

Happy mapping,
Dimitar
NGlf (2026-04-08 04:58:33+00:00): Hi Dimitar. I tried to include every missing station for Electrip and Fines.
I had a template in my head from the Greek stations for Electrip and that's why i have the capital letter. 
NSI has no Greek provider so i forgot to check (again) for Electrip.

For the network and/or branch i have in mind that the same provider cover many countries.  
So in Greece the legal entity is Electrip Greece and you have Electrip Bulgaria. So that's why i left the same network tag for both countries.
One question in my mind is about Turkey where Electrip is ZES.

These are my thoughts. I have no objection in using a template that the Bulgarian community decides as best.  

You will see i am using two name tags so you can use Cyrillic alphabet for the name tag and have an english name for each station. 
That's what i use for Greece to help foreign users with their routing software.
I also try to include address for each station in Cyrillic.

I suggest you do a massive update for the whole Bulgaria for each network with the final edits so i can copy from somewhere when there is a new station added. I keep track of this.

As i said look for Fines also. Almost all new stations are added. 
Next will be Eldrive to attend to.
Ltrlg (2026-04-03 08:02:24+00:00): À quoi sert de mettre une adresse sur ce type d’objets ?
Sébastien Chopin (2026-04-04 11:34:51+00:00): Pour les personnes qui se servent d’OSM comme d’un moteur de recherche.
Ltrlg (2026-04-07 08:16:22+00:00): C’est-à-dire ?
Sébastien Chopin (2026-04-12 05:27:52+00:00): Quand une application/site OSM t’affiche directement les infos, pas besoin de passer par Gemini pour avoir des détails. Ça évite les fausses pistes (liens sponsorisés).
ici, d’avoir directement l’info que le marché Lafayette est sur la place Lafayette fixe les choses dans l’esprit des utilisateurs.
Ltrlg (2026-04-17 11:13:32+00:00): Décidément j’ai du mal à comprendre ton cas d’usage. J’imagine que ça marchera mieux de vive voix.
eggie (2026-03-25 21:23:43+00:00): Dag GertJan.. Kijk nooit naar de daken en dan een gebouw gaan uitlijnen. Daar staat het gebouw niet.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-25 21:25:58+00:00): Het gebouw heb ik even opnieuw uitgelijnd. Daar is al meer een poging gedaan zie ik. Het ligt nu correct al lijkt da wellicht verkeerd. Waar je het dak ziet staat niet het gebouw.
NeisBot (2026-03-25 20:45:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13388723437 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cleaning services building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-02 22:33:20+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/180588397
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
uprkos (2026-03-27 07:26:07+00:00): Czy to na pewno restauracja w budynku a nie fast food w foodtrucku? Kilka miesięcy gdy tam przechodziłem stał foodtruck, ale może coś się zmieniło od tego czasu.
gotitim (2026-03-27 07:37:30+00:00): A rzeczywiście, przepraszam
impiaaa (2026-03-26 19:46:46+00:00): Thanks for your contribution! Please be a little more detailed in your changeset description. For example, "Added building outline using aerial imagery." The description is there so that it's easy for others to understand what you changed and why, without having to analyze the changeset. Here's some more guidance and examples: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
GerdP (2026-06-09 07:52:19+00:00): Moin!
Ich denke, das diese Relation gelöscht werden kann. Beschilderung habe ich keine mehr gefunden. Spricht was dagegen?
eggie (2026-03-25 21:28:26+00:00): Dag Liskwartier,

Ik zie de paden ook niet op de foto.
Wanneer je nog wel iets ziet is het soms beter om eerst disused:highway=path te taggen. Dat voorkomt opnieuw intekenen.

MVG
eggie
Liskwartier (2026-03-25 21:33:40+00:00): Bedankt, in dit geval zijn de paden echt verdwenen en waar bij het Mollenlaantje en Fazantenlaantje zijn er houtwallen opgetrokken om te voorkomen dat mensen toch nog het gebied inlopen.
eggie (2026-03-25 21:56:10+00:00): Lijkt me oke. Je kunt nog wel je eigen notes op de kaart sluiten.
eggie (2026-03-25 21:38:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Frank Peng (2026-03-26 13:50:27+00:00): I'm curious as to why you deleted a residential road (the residential road with the name=* tag of "Tiffany Lane" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20361042/history) in this changeset. Maybe that road doesn't exist anymore?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180427659
iismitch55 (2026-03-26 18:51:48+00:00): Tiffany Lane was road that crossed what is now US 460, which was adjacent to the property at 257 Jennelle Road and provided access to the properties that are currently addressed at 711 and 811 Cinnabar Road. You can reference historical imagery on Google Earth to confirm this. There is a remnant right of way shown in the county GIS, but it is overgrown and does not access any property.

The way that was previously mapped was a different access road which lead to the property currently addressed as 660 Cinnabar Road. Again reference Google Earth historical imagery. It was not Tiffany Lane, but a private driveway. The property containing the remnant driveway is currently owned by Commonwealth of Virginia according to GIS data.
iismitch55 (2026-03-26 18:54:59+00:00): Small correction, properties which used to be accessed by Tiffany Lane are currently addressed as **771** and 811 Cinnabar Road
gurglypipe (2026-03-25 22:59:45+00:00): Did you intend to remove the Wikidata ID from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/691263314? It seemed to be correct.

Thanks for the updates in Grange :)
phodgkin (2026-03-26 09:01:05+00:00): Good catch! Embarrassing as I originally added it...

It was confusing because the listing is "Barclays Bank", but refers to the building itself, not the bank brand.

Fixed.
gurglypipe (2026-03-26 11:58:05+00:00): Super, thanks, I thought it would be something like that — an easy mistake to make!
旧加卷 (2026-03-26 02:37:06+00:00): Imagery from AutoNavi (Gaode/高德) is not compatible with the ODbL.
GrosLap (2026-03-25 22:26:05+00:00): Sorry I was thinking of creating a temporary GPS point to find my car in the parking lot.
Besides, how else can you do it in the CoMaps application ?
Lejun (2026-03-27 16:01:56+00:00): I don't think that's possible but I'm don't use CoMaps. As a workaround you could try using OsmAnd which add a staging step before uploading.
NeisBot (2026-03-25 21:27:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 14 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1054633997 v1 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/985099512 v7 | 7 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/9679787425 v2
https://osm.org/node/9679770711 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180428307
iandees (2026-03-25 22:21:29+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9679770711, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9679787425 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180429901, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
eggie (2026-03-25 21:42:02+00:00): Dag Guus,

Waarom neem je die shelter op in een relatie OV?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-25 21:42:55+00:00): Ik denk ook dat building=roof met layer=1 ontbreekt.
Gr eggie
NeisBot (2026-03-25 21:33:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/9140624864 v6

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mexican restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-25 23:33:15+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-05 07:37:53+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other mistagging for POI in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185126540
Ra_colate (2026-06-22 16:50:41+00:00): Hi asabea,

 Thank You for your contribution. I have fixed validation error for intersecting buildings (1492914974, 1492914976, 1488939850, 1488939849)
) within your 2 fixed tasks. Take a closer look while data upload. Happy Mapping!
muralito (2026-03-27 17:05:14+00:00): Hi. Childcare or parking?
UYMapper (2026-05-13 13:03:21+00:00): Es un parking que también tiene un salón de fiestas. Corregido.

El nombre León corresponde a un alojamiento universitario que está enfrente. (Estaba todo entreverado)
eggie (2026-03-26 08:18:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
JIDB (2026-04-20 12:10:46+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe jetzt zufällig festgestellt, dass Grpahhopper hier ein Abbiegen nach links vorschlägt, obwohl es dort verboten ist:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=48.161715%2C11.510815%3B48.161708%2C11.511735#map=20/48.1614791/11.5109414&layers=C

Ich sehe, dass folgende Restriction vor 26 Tage durch diesem Changeset geändert wurde:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6697513/history
Der "via"-Mitglied ist nach der Änderung nicht mehr da und ich vermute, dass es das Routing stört, da es laut Wiki ein Pflichtwert ist.

Gab es einen bestimmten Grund, den "via"-Mitglied zu entfernen oder ist es vielleicht versehentlich passiert?
Herr Bause (2026-04-20 12:30:11+00:00): Hallo,
danke fürs drüberschauen.
Das war ein Versehen, hatte die Ampel von der Mitte an die Haltelinien gesetzt und vergessen die Abbiegebeschränkung wieder einzutragen.
habe gesehen dass du es wieder eingetragen Hast - Danke
JIDB (2026-04-20 15:05:55+00:00): Danke der schnelle Rückmeldung. Derjenige, der mir gefragt hatte, was da los sein könnte, hat es wohl wieder eingetragen.
Allerdings war ich auf mindestens 2 weitere restriction gestoßen, wo es auch so passiert ist, weshalb ich mich gefragt habe, ob es einen Grund geben könnte.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1546053
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8845823
Die sind aktuell noch nicht korrigiert.
Herr Bause (2026-04-20 15:09:58+00:00): Saparalott, hatte ich wohl einen Blackout.
Werds gleich korrigieren.

hast du eine bestimmte Vorgehensweise sowas zu überprüfen?
Herr Bause (2026-04-20 15:14:12+00:00): Hi, bei Relation/1546053 fällt mir nichts auf
Herr Bause (2026-04-20 15:19:36+00:00): bei relation/8845823 also Kreuzung Rosenheimer-/ Bazeillesstraße war ich nicht dran, allerdings ist die Bazeillesstraße eine Einbahnstraße braucht es da noch eine Restriction?
JIDB (2026-04-20 18:02:23+00:00): Hallo,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1546053 hat in Version 7 kein "via" mehr. Das hatte noch in Version 6.

Bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8845823 zeigt mir die Website, dass du sie zuletzt vor 14 Tage geändert hast. Das ist die Kreuzung zur Pariser Str (nicht zu Bazeillestr). Auch dort zeigt die Website, dass "via" zwischen Version 2 und 3 verschwunden ist. (In JOSM ist es schwerer die Historie der Relation zu verfolgen).

Zu deiner Frage, ob ich eine Vorgehensweise habe: ich hatte eine overpass-Anfrage gemacht, um zu schauen, ob es weitere restriction ohne "via" gab und hatte ein paar in München gefunden.
JIDB (2026-04-20 18:08:21+00:00): Die Overpass-Abfrage war übrigens: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2olw (ich habe aber nicht alle Ergenisse geprüft, sondern nur 2-3 angeklickt)

rel[type=restriction]({{bbox}})(if:count_by_role("via") == 0);

out center;
Herr Bause (2026-04-20 18:36:43+00:00): Danke dir.
Wie das Via verschwunden ist-keine Ahnung. Aber beim Überprüfen in Mapillary habe ich gesehn das da ein Wechselverkehrszeichen ist, also sind hier die Beschränkungen temporär. Wie das eintragen?
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=979742496127954&focus=photo&lat=48.126729919741&lng=11.596951771845&z=17&x=0.5654548430804429&y=0.3218926507172756&zoom=0.574108818011257
JIDB (2026-04-20 20:10:43+00:00): Gut beobachtet! Ich weiß, dass  Bedingungen mit @ angeben werden können, aber wie genau und ob es hier Sinn macht, weiß ich jetzt nicht. Falls der Wiki da nicht hilft, könnte sich lohnen im Forum nachzufragen.

Allerdings würde ich davor schauen, ob die Lage noch aktuell ist. Die Bilder sind definitiv veraltet. Dort gibt es inzwischen nur noch 1 Kfz-Spur je Fahrrichtung: in/nach der Corona-Zeit ist nämlich einen Radweg dazu gekommen. Ob die Wechselverkehrszeichen noch da sind, weiß ich aber nicht. Ich kann aber versuchen, die Tage mal vorbei zu fahren.
Herr Bause (2026-04-21 06:50:54+00:00): Servus, ja das wäre gut, ich komme da in nächster Zeit nicht in die Gegend.
Ich habe jetzt alle Restriction aus deiner Overpassabfrage wieder hergestellt.
Hoffe ich hab nichts übersehen :-)
Frohes Mappen
JIDB (2026-04-22 07:53:43+00:00): Hallo, ich bin vorbei gefahren, die Wechselverkehrszeichen gibt es immer noch und der Anbiegeverbot war auch angezeigt. Was ich nicht weiß, ist, ob sie eventuell inzwischen immer aktiv sind oder weiterhin nur zeitweise.

Zu der Frage, wie man es eintrage kann: Hier ein Beispiel, wo es früher mal so war: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1700997/history/6 Dort wurde es mit volatile + restriction:conditional gemacht. Wie wir die Zeiten hier ermitteln können, weiß ich aber nicht. Im Zweifel würde ich vermuten, dass es besser ist, die restriction einzutragen und mit volatile ohne Details zu den Zeiten zu kennzeichnen.
Herr Bause (2026-04-22 08:03:22+00:00): Hi,
denke auch das man es so lässt. Ich habe mal ein Fixme dazu eingetragen.
Vielleicht findet sich ja jemand der sich einen Tag hinsetzt und das dokumentiert :-)
Herr Bause (2026-04-22 08:04:47+00:00): obwohl, das kann sich natürlich auch täglich ändern. Also eine Woche das Zelt aufschlagen :-))

Wünsch dir frohes mappen
JIDB (2026-04-22 17:47:09+00:00): Danke für die Zusammenarbeit und dir auch frohes Mappen
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 01:35:09+00:00): Revert changeset with nonsensical tagging and comment in changeset 184205005

https://osm.org/changeset/184205005
ajmat (2026-03-26 06:11:28+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 180437318
NeisBot (2026-03-25 21:54:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13556437036 v6

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Car repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-25 23:33:16+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-05 07:29:05+00:00): Reverted series of changesets adding SEO POI and blatantly promotional description=* and other malformed tags to it

https://osm.org/changeset/185126373
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 01:33:02+00:00): Revert changesets with nonsensical tagging, promotional content and/or prohibited source=* (Google) in changeset 184204962

https://osm.org/changeset/184204962