piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-01 06:14:06+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380537646

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rarad74 (2025-12-29 14:05:41+00:00): Bussway se pune NUMAI impreuna cu un way normal de strada. Niciodata separat  deoarece nu se vede, nu se randeaza pe harta. Citeste documentatia WIKIPEDIA.

Este ultima data  cand o sa fii avertizat ca nu pui comentarii si nu iei in considerare ce ti se spune pe aici. Nu suntem prostii tai ca sa stam sa verificam dupa tine ce prostii mai faci pe aici.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-30 04:43:58+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13415721575

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-31 04:24:01+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13415721575

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-31 05:13:56+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13415721575

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-01 04:53:58+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13415721575

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-01 05:53:34+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13415721575

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-01 06:14:13+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13415721575

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2025-12-29 17:17:54+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13415736217 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Math tutoring center in Burleson"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisRevert (2026-01-07 06:56:38+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176930765
(Deleted leftovers after several edits)
NeisReview (2026-01-07 06:58:00+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176930765
Thanks @NeisRevert
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 15:28:50+00:00): Reverted adding Mathnasium SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184437512

https://osm.org/changeset/184437512
Vinber-Pro (2026-02-06 15:40:31+00:00): salut,
la mairie a changé de lieu  ?

ou c'est un service de la mairie ?
ERIC JAOUEN (2026-02-07 06:45:44+00:00): La mairie n'a pas changé de lieu, c'est un service de la mairie.
tkk (2026-01-08 09:14:51+00:00): Ahoj, nevim jestli je to zamerne nebo to dela iD, ale opakovane jsi upravil https://osm.org/node/12073757312 na mapu. Realne je to ale podle fotek informacni tabule, ktera krome jineho obsahuje i mapu. Muzes to prosim nejak okomentovat? Dekuji tom.k
Arktorus (2026-01-20 14:55:24+00:00): Ahoj, Omlouvám se za zpoždění mé reakce. je to mapa ano bydlím v Lipníku a je to mapa. ale furt se to buguje xd.
Nebo někdo s tím asi něco dělá. Moc to nechápu :D
tkk (2026-01-21 07:16:01+00:00): Ahoj, prave ze nejedna. Jak to vypada vim, viz. napr. https://osm.fit.vutbr.cz/fody/?id=43244 a tohle je informacni tabule a to z toho duvodu, ze krome mapy jsou tam i jine veci. Proto je take typ informacni tabule history;map. Stejne tak to neni hiking=yes, protoze to neobsahuje turisticke pesi trasy. Opravil jsem to zpatky a prosim prestan to predelavat na neco, co neodpovida skutecnosti. Dekuji.
Arktorus (2026-01-29 16:09:50+00:00): ok, děkuji za vysvětlení budu si na to dávat pozor. A omlouvám se za nejasnosti. :D
joost schouppe (2026-01-05 14:35:46+00:00): Je aanpassing van https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1462578834 is fout; het gekke is dat dit je dit vlak naast https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/714733330 , dat je zelf getekend hebt. Ik denk dat het misschien een voorlopige versie was die per ongeluk opgeladen is geraakt. Ik haal hem weg.
NeisBot (2025-12-29 17:18:07+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13415490461 v2

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Sadek Dev housing in Naser City Cairo Governorate"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisReview (2026-01-07 06:56:39+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/176582326
Thanks @sadek4
NeisReview (2026-01-07 06:58:00+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/176582326
Thanks @sadek4
Taya_S (2026-02-12 12:44:10+00:00): Reverted data imported from Google

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178456222
Taya_S (2026-02-12 12:44:11+00:00): Reverted data imported from Google

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178456222
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-03 08:15:11+00:00): Split POI and building, remove SEO spammy tags and add missing top-level tags in changeset 183579808

https://osm.org/changeset/183579808
pwbriggs (2025-12-30 00:47:05+00:00): Thanks. Deleting the park is not correct, but if there is a sign or similar at this park that says something like "residents only" or "no trespassing," we can add access=private to the park and facilities here. Is there a sign to that effect here?

For more info, please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Verifiability and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can't_I_delete_this_trail%3F#Why_am_I_getting_pushback? (that resource is specifically about private trails but some of its points apply here).

We want to do what we can to help make OpenStreetMap more accurate. Thank you for your interest in OSM and you patience as we work on this issue.
Branko Kokanovic (2026-02-07 12:12:03+00:00): Jel ovo novo ime ulice koje jos nije u RGZ-u?:) Kako si dosao da imena ulice?:)
vasony (2025-12-30 10:07:27+00:00): Szia!

Többedik szerkesztésed hol a házszám vagy a címkék végére láthatatlan karakter kerül.
Másolásnál vagy AI generálásnál ezeket távolítsd el.

Köszi, Tamás
eggie (2025-12-29 15:46:48+00:00): Dag R Markink,

Maak altijd een verbinding mey kruisende wegen
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 	1
en teken geen wegen op wegen.
Ik heb het onderliggende pad verwijderd en een verbindingsnode gemaakt.

MVG
eggie
Scout Jens (2026-04-03 15:37:05+00:00): Die Tags access=yes und access=permissive kennzeichnen ein Merkmal als zugänglich für alle Verkehrsträger. Dies ist fast nie der Fall, und stattdessen sollten genauere Tags verwendet werden. Für weitere Einzelheiten siehe Wiki.
Jrachi (2025-12-30 10:55:05+00:00): Ciao.
Nella relazione hai inserito una data inesistente/errata. 
Nelle relazioni i guidepost devono avere il ruolo guidepost.

Ivo
soliMM (2025-12-30 09:00:59+00:00): This changeset has been almost completely reverted in following changesets:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176615982 - Inappropriate changes to road classification.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176616246 - Invalid geometry changes made to building polygon and roads
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-05 18:50:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219357283/history - is this hospital closed or open?
blackcloud77 (2026-01-05 19:08:22+00:00): Hospital is closed.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-05 19:23:44+00:00): then you should edit also amenity=hospital tag
blackcloud77 (2026-01-05 20:32:29+00:00): Missed that, thanks!  Fixed now.
NeisBot (2025-12-29 17:20:11+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13415856715 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Electronics store"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisReview (2026-01-07 07:09:17+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/176582326
Thanks @sadek4
Taya_S (2026-02-12 12:44:12+00:00): Reverted data imported from Google

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178456222
eggie (2025-12-29 15:42:56+00:00): Dag Stephsoft,

Zo'n losse zebra kun je gewoon laten staan in OSM.
MVG
eggie
marczoutendijk (2025-12-29 14:57:13+00:00): west -> east !
the_hans (2026-01-10 14:41:40+00:00): Wo kommen die Öffnungszeiten her? 
Stadtfarm hat doch seit November 2023 dauerhaft den Betrieb eingestellt so weit ich weiß. 
https://www.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/bezirke/der-markt-fur-nachhaltige-produkte-ist-schwierig-geworden-stadtfarm-in-berlin-lichtenberg-muss-schliessen-11059924.html
JDL09Organic (2026-01-10 15:06:41+00:00): Alles klar, das wusste ich nicht. Ich war dort letztens spazieren und hatte das Schild für die Öffnungszeiten gesehen und nicht länger drüber nachgedacht.
the_hans (2026-01-14 22:55:27+00:00): Der Auszug war wohl eher überstürzt und nicht nur das Schild haben sie zurückgelassen. Ich aktualisiere das hier mal.
totera (2025-12-31 00:02:42+00:00): Ciao fayor, perché cancellare località e codici postali dai nodi?
La cancellazione non sarebbe giustificata neanche se i dati fossero deducibili, ma non siamo nemmeno in questa situazione in quanto:
1) il CAP 96100 non è presente nei dati di OpenStreetMap né come relazione a sé stante né come tag di altra relazione e quindi non è ricavabile
2) esistono altre località postali nel comune oltre a Siracusa e anche in questo caso se non abbiamo i confini la località non è deducibile
Taya_S (2026-02-12 12:44:13+00:00): Reverted data imported from Google

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178456222
Ltrlg (2026-01-05 18:16:21+00:00): Salut symac ! Pas besoin de préfixe `comment:`, les guillemets ont déjà cette signification, cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours/specification#comment
symac (2026-01-06 21:55:12+00:00): Re,
je ne mettais pas le préfixe jusqu'à ce que quelqu'un me dise dans un comment il y a peu qu'il fallait ajouter cela pour que certains logiciels comprennent que c'était un commentaire, mais en relisant la doc que tu pointes en effet le comment: n'est là que pour préciser de quoi on parle dans la documentation et les guillemets suffisent. Je ne retrouve pas le message original que l'on m'avait envoyé donc soit j'avais mal compris soit c'était une erreur, mais je prends note pour la suite merci !
symac (2026-01-06 21:59:41+00:00): Bon bein c'était là https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172091978 et c'est juste moi qui avais du aller regarder la doc et mal la comprendre, merci pour le rappel donc !
Ltrlg (2026-01-07 10:30:06+00:00): 👍
LudovicG (2026-02-13 08:08:30+00:00): Grand merci pour la ref de la post_box du Center Parcs ! (je ne savais pas comment la récupérer sans être client celle-ci :D ) Truc bizarre : je ne retrouve pas la ref dans dataNOVA :grimacing:
Vétérini (2026-02-13 21:45:57+00:00): Haha c'est chose faite alors ! Même La Poste a dû oublier cette boîte il faut croire !
Taktaal (2026-02-10 20:17:25+00:00): Übrigens, highway=escape sind diese Dinger: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notfallspur_(Gef%C3%A4lle)

In einem Spital also nicht so ganz zutreffend :)
NeisBot (2025-12-29 17:12:34+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 24 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1462322186 v6 | 24 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176583374
NeisReview (2026-01-07 17:38:42+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/176938528
chath_tsu (2025-12-30 00:34:34+00:00): Hi! Can you clarify where does the 10 mph figure come from? Is there a speed limit sign? Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176583382
NeisBot (2025-12-29 17:20:18+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13415964148 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Berliner Mieterorganisation"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisRevert (2026-01-07 07:09:18+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176931066
Glassman (2025-12-31 00:07:48+00:00): I suggest you remove the access=no tag which would prevent routers from taking you to the destination. Since it's tagged as a driveway, it's consider access=private by the nature of it's use. Please review this edit.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176583779
rempshaener (2025-12-29 16:17:48+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Nach deinem Kommentar zum Änderungssatz gilt hier „Motorfahrzeuge verboten/ Anlieger frei“. Dazu passen die gesetzten Werte nicht.
Am ehesten wäre das ein motor_vehicle=destination.
Das kannst du dir aber auch ganz einfach hier https://trafficsigns.osm-verkehrswende.org/DE zusammenklicken.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
wermak (2026-04-27 11:54:34+00:00): Nach aktuellen Mapillary-Bildern gilt hier dies, https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.55065459719&lng=10.279542303575&z=19.18671209564346&menu=false&focus=photo&mapStyle=Esri+satellite&pKey=1057728726487013.
Motor_vehicle=agricultural eingetragen.
eggie (2025-12-29 18:56:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-01 06:14:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1181031602

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Syhmac (2026-01-01 14:44:35+00:00): Dzięki za uwagę, wprowadzę potrzebne poprawki jak będę miał chwilę czasu :D
Frans S (2025-12-29 16:01:46+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
In general, your mappings are far below the quality standards of HOTOSM
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping. 

B: Overlapping buildings.



D: Connecting nodes to other features. (buildings to highways. Serious error !

E: Buildings not squared or rounded.



Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176584889
nileshbarawkar (2025-12-30 11:35:02+00:00): Thanks for contribution to OSM map, at this Changeset you made this road as motorway as per local Knowledge, but i can see this road is hanging from both side with construction status. can you update this.
Thanks Again.
nileshbarawkar (2025-12-30 11:44:33+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for your contribution in OSM, as per this changeset you removed the construction status as per local  Knowledge, but service road is hanging from one side , can you you confirm is it open or not again?
Thanks Again
Kshisu1 (2025-12-30 15:39:48+00:00): Satelite map is now available with some part construction visible. I am using mobile and not pc so it's difficult to properly edit.
Service road need not to be under construction.also visible in satelite view. So if possible edit accordingly. 
Motor road is not open yet. We can keep some part of road under construction.
Thanks.
BCNorwich (2025-12-29 16:47:10+00:00): Hi, there's no need to tag these footpaths as sidewalks in the UK.
rskedgell (2025-12-30 13:28:56+00:00): @BCNorwich sorry, I strongly disagree with that assertion. Could you point me to where this was discussed or documented?

These separate sidewalks probably shouldn't have been mapped at all, but that's a different matter and not relevant to this changeset.
BCNorwich (2025-12-30 14:47:52+00:00): Hi rskedgell,

I'm getting on a bit now, I must have met many thousands of people, with one single exception, I've yet to hear anyone call or describe a UK footpath as a sidewalk.

What is the need to describe a UK footpath or footway a sidewalk.

Regards Bernard.
rskedgell (2025-12-30 15:19:36+00:00): You're entitled to your opinion, but you shouldn't present it to a new mapper as if it were in any way the established consensus in the UK.

It's used in order to disambiguate a sidewalk/pavement/footway from a footway which isn't a sidewalk? It's useful information for routers or renderers. We're stuck with the Americanism of footway=sidewalk because the correct legal term for this part of a highway, per s. 329(1) Highways Act 1980 is "footway" (a way comprised in a highway which also comprises a carriageway, being a way over which the public have a right of way on foot only). In everyday speech it's called a "pavement", but that would be confusing to the majority of US and Canadian mappers.

It's distinct from a footpath, also mapped as highway=footway (a highway over which the public have a right of way on foot only, not being a footway).

It's also been used over 180k times, particularly in the last 5 years, so it's a bit late to attempt a unilateral deprecation of established and valid tagging.
https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/europe:united-kingdom/tags/footway=sidewalk

Perhaps we should take this to https://community.openstreetmap.org/ in order to see if your view has any support amongst other UK mappers?
zombiequokka (2025-12-30 15:21:30+00:00): A quick glance at the contents of the dataset for most of the Greater London area shows:

Total Footways: 516319
Total Footways marked as Sidewalks: 161135

So it does seem to be a fairly normal set of tags to exist.
Findus23 (2025-12-29 16:45:42+00:00): I seem to have found the wrong object to edit. I have reverted this changeset.
Findus23 (2025-12-29 16:39:36+00:00): I did not realize that this was already mapped in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2918742. I will undo these changes
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-13 09:13:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5303255983/history has shop = beer that was added in this edit
shop=beer ? Maybe shop=alcohol alcohol=beer would work well, indicating that shop sells primarily this alcohol? Having separate shop types for sake, whisky, cider, beer, wine, red wine etc etc seems a poor idea while cascading tagging still provides full info for anyone interested while providing also top-level basic info for someone wanting 100 shop types rather than 10 000.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=alcohol
Syhmac (2025-12-29 16:25:38+00:00): Sources: Survey, Local Knowledge, Satellite photos
mottiger (2025-12-29 16:38:11+00:00): source: swisstopo SWISSIMAGE
mueschel (2025-12-31 09:37:34+00:00): There are ways with tags like "6 = 4" or "6=5"
PierZen (2025-12-31 14:25:36+00:00): thanks, corrected