piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Plmilo08 (2026-05-29 21:03:14+00:00): Hi sorry about this i am currently developing a map for a video game and im using OSM to generate the map and the vegetation,buildings and im trying to get shillelagh and surrounding towns and roads leading to the towns to be modeled. So im trying to add as much detail i can so the 'map' will be more detailed.
About this, it could be a mistake from my side accidently changing the road type when i was lining up the roads 
Im very sorry for the inconvenience and i hope it has been solved and if not i can get right to it
If any questions please let know how to get in contact as i dont know exactly how to work osm 
Once again im very sorry 
Plmilo08
VictorIE (2026-05-30 10:07:30+00:00): Hi,

It should be all fixed now. 

Good luck with the game!
Plmilo08 (2026-05-30 13:46:53+00:00): Thank you
Im glad the issue has been solved
Plmilo08
Till_btn (2026-05-31 11:03:47+00:00): Sicher, dass sie abgebaut wurde? Die DHL-Website zeigt sie weiterhin an und zwar inklusive Auslastungsanzeige
Marcus-K (2026-05-31 16:41:51+00:00): Die ist weg. Das weiß ich, weil ich mir was vor ein paar Wochen dorthin schicken ließ, das zur Postfiliale umgeleitet wurde und ich dann den Standort vor Ort kontrolliert habe. Mag sein, dass die irgendwann wieder auftaucht, aber zurzeit ist da keine Packstation mehr 😔
Till_btn (2026-05-31 16:46:38+00:00): Alles klar, danke für die Rückmeldung!
Marcus-K (2026-06-18 18:44:27+00:00): Sie steht wieder (bzw. es steht dort eine neue Packstation). Da ich nicht weiß, wie ich den Change zurückrollen kann, darfst du oder jemand anders das gerne übernehmen (sofern ich es bis dahin nicht selbst herausgefunden habe).
Marcus-K (2026-06-18 18:53:41+00:00): Reverted mit Changeset 184285884.
MapmakerrrJohn (2026-05-27 22:05:13+00:00): Maybe make smaller edits instead of a huge changeset.
jcarlson (2026-05-28 18:02:29+00:00): thanks for fixing so many of these building shapes!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183276017
michi68 (2026-05-30 15:52:15+00:00): Mauro non sono d'accordo. Le linee guida di OSM non prevedono di cancellare la traccia, perchè si perde lo storico. Solitamente si tagga il percorso come "abandoned" e access = no.
mauro742 (2026-06-01 21:38:09+00:00): Ti ringrazio per la segnalazione. Ho provveduto ad effettuare un revert, taggando il percorso come abandoned. Per mantere lo storico, ho recuperato da bibliografia i corretti riferimenti dei percorsi dismessi.
eggie (2026-05-28 08:00:48+00:00): Hoi,

Ik heb de straatnamen gecorrigeerd. De Broekstraat liep nu niet meer door. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-05-28 08:02:51+00:00): De Broekstraat had ook een verkeerde naam. (Heihoeksweg)
eggie (2026-05-28 08:08:15+00:00): Het Kadaster doet ook maar wat
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=182503.59&geometry.y=415838.03&zoomlevel=14.71
eggie (2026-05-28 08:15:00+00:00): Ik heb de straatnamen weer teruggezet.
De BGT noemt het stuk Heihoekseweg richting Kapellaan Broekstraat,
In BGT/Kadaster Verbeter de kaart heet het Broekstraat?
Je zou eens een terugmelding kunnen doen en om opheldering vragen.
De kaart spreekt zichzelf tegen. 
Een terugmelding kan hier..
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=182652.77&geometry.y=415882.23&zoomlevel=13.08
AJCHurkens (2026-05-28 10:05:03+00:00): Volgens de straatnaambordjes (zie https://www.mariakapellen.nl/gassel.htm) eindigt de Kapellaan bij de kapel die zelf geen adres in de BAG heeft. De Kapellaan en de Graafsedijk zijn kadastraal hetzelfde perceel (in de voormalige gemeente Gassel) en liggen op een route van Grave naar Boxmeer, deels ook Graafs(ch)edijk/weg genoemd.
eggie (2026-05-28 10:19:41+00:00): Hoi .. Ik bedoel eigenlijk dat stukje straat tussen Kapellaan en Turnhoutse weg.
Dat heet op 'Verbeter de kaart Kadaster'
Broekstraat, maar bij een zoekslag heet het Heihoekseweg.
Paar keer CTRL-F5 toeytsen voor het effect. Ik had dat eerst aangepast naar Broekstraat, maar m'n wijziging teruggezet (moest nog uploaden) naar Heihoekseweg.
Je zou dus bij het Kadaster kunnen navragen wat nu juist is. 
Het geeft nu verwarring.
eggie (2026-05-28 10:28:46+00:00): 'Kapel' toegevoegd
eggie (2026-05-28 10:30:57+00:00): Volgens de straatnaamborden inderdaad Heihoekseweg. 
https://www.mariakapellen.nl/gassel.htm
DiogoBaptista98 (2026-07-30 23:25:52+00:00): RazorWind, tens vindo a substituir repetidamente estações mapeadas como áreas por simples nós, revertendo trabalho já realizado sem apresentares qualquer justificação ou iniciares uma discussão. Quando existe informação suficiente para mapear uma estação como área, essa é a representação mais detalhada e completa da infraestrutura, enquanto um nó constitui apenas uma simplificação. Estas reversões eliminam detalhe e desfazem trabalho válido sem uma fundamentação técnica aparente. Peço que deixes de efetuar estas alterações de forma sistemática e que, caso consideres que existe algum problema com o mapeamento, o expliques e procures consenso antes de reverter contribuições de outros utilizadores.
moonraver (2026-06-04 07:24:58+00:00): aho, vieme kecnúť o ten cyklotrase medzi Trenč.Teplou a DCA elektrárňou?  Vidím, že si viac vymakaný v týchto veciach, ale myslím, že tam niečo chýba, lebo si dal bicycle=designated a tým pádom si zamedzil prístup chodcom. Ja osobne mám stále problém pochopiť aj napr. hrádzu v TN, kde je to isté - zákaz vjazdu motor.vozidlám, povolené sú iba vozidlá SVP,š.p. /to isté čo tu/,podľa OSM wiki by to malo byť highway=path s príslušnými povoleniami ale tá blbá AI mi stále tvrdí, že ak sú tam privátne prístupy s motor.vozidlami tak by to mala byť highway=service.Asi je to vec pohľadu. ZBGIS tvrdí,že jeto účelová komunikácia (service).Som lokal z Trenč.Teplej. Aký máš pohľad na to?
pesticides (2026-05-27 22:42:23+00:00): The entire road has a shoulder, but it varies from 7' to less than 1'. In the absence of any guidance on the OSM wiki, I chose 4' as threshold for cycleway=shoulder. Per WSDOT, this is the minimum width of a shoulder that "facilitates bicycle travel", though their recommended minimum is 5'. This jives with my subjective experience cycling: 4' can be pretty uncomfortable to ride on and provides little margin for error, but it's wide enough that you'll have room to maneuver around small obstacles on the shoulder.
Cordless5246 (2026-06-04 01:32:13+00:00): @Baloo Uriza What is the reasoning for the bad review? If it is about the grass, it is often parked on when the gravel parking becomes full.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183277965
Hugoren Martinako (2026-05-31 19:03:13+00:00): Buenas, acuérdate de poner el prefijo del teléfono cuando añadas uno.

Saludos
T19B1K10T19B1 (2026-05-27 23:04:21+00:00): Ups, habe mich vertan. Meinte 
changeset/182176521
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-03 12:31:25+00:00): Are the maxspeeds you're adding posted or school district policy, or is that just estimated speed?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183278389
Cordless5246 (2026-06-03 23:54:05+00:00): Estimated speed for a school parking lot
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183278389
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-04 01:05:46+00:00): OK, maxspeed=* tags are for the actual speed limits.
Cordless5246 (2026-06-04 01:19:31+00:00): I removed it. Is there a way to add a suggested speed?
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-04 04:07:43+00:00): Not really, it's more of a tag-what-you-see situation.  The white speed limit signs would be maxspeed=* and the yellow suggested speed signs would be maxspeed:advisory=*.

What's on there now should be enough to get it into the idea for most data consumers what's going on there (it's a driveway of some kind not meant for through travel and loops back on a more direct road).
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-03 12:31:49+00:00): You've added a 10 MPH speed limit to a street?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183278553
Cordless5246 (2026-06-04 00:02:16+00:00): This is why I deleted the street, because I could not adjust the speed limit for the school and daycare parking lot without changing the speed limit for the whole street. So I added the street back but left it out of the parking lots.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183278553
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-03 12:32:09+00:00): Jefferson is one-way through half of town?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183278604
Cordless5246 (2026-06-04 00:08:36+00:00): I edited the street after the fact and changed it to just one way in the school and daycare parking lot. It's one way during school times.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183278604
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-03 12:32:26+00:00): Jefferson doesn't exist?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183278703
Cordless5246 (2026-06-03 23:58:28+00:00): it does exist, but it was a solid street going through the school and daycare parking lot. So I deleted it and added it back as needed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183278703
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-04 01:06:09+00:00): I see that now, mybad.
Cordless5246 (2026-06-04 01:17:34+00:00): You're good. I'm still new and learning so I appreciate the knowledge.
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-03 12:33:22+00:00): If this driveway is not named, then remove the name tag and add noname=yes.  If the name tag looks right, then it's still wrong since "West" and "Street" needs to be spelled out.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183278716
Cordless5246 (2026-06-03 23:56:18+00:00): This is a street that comes into the school and daycare parking lot.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183278716
Cordless5246 (2026-06-04 01:36:12+00:00): @Baloo Uriza What is the reason for the bad review? This is where West Jefferson Street becomes the parking lot for the School and Daycare and then to the south of that becomes a one-way during school periods.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183278762
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-05 18:10:58+00:00): Hi, thanks for doing this. I just spotted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1523850570 where there are 20 houses in the terrace, but you've put the highest one as 19. Maybe there's an "A" in there, or maybe the highest one isn't actually 19?
UtterClutter (2026-07-06 11:58:07+00:00): Hi, it turns out that there was a cheeky 8A nesting in there so I've popped it in and enhanced some 3D while I was at it.
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-06 18:09:32+00:00): Amazing, thank you
UtMtnMan (2026-05-29 22:30:13+00:00): Gentec LPR cameras on BYU property as you enter towards the OIT and Philanthropy Buildings. Almost certainly owned by BYU.
UtMtnMan (2026-05-29 22:31:28+00:00): Gentec LPR cameras on BYU property as you exit to University Ave from the OIT and Philanthropy Buildings. Almost certainly owned by BYU.
idkwhatname2use (2026-05-27 23:58:03+00:00): Hello
This is the Balboa Line. Please see its Wikipedia article to learn more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balboa_Line . It is also visible from the ground, and is quite well known in the area. Please learn more about an area before recklessly removing something that exists.
idkwhatname2use (2026-05-28 00:07:21+00:00): "Overall, mapping such features is acceptable where some remains like embankments, remains of bridges, etc., remain, even if rails are gone. In locations where the railway has been replaced by new buildings and roads, the mapping of such features becomes out of scope for OpenStreetMap." Please stick to the UK!!!! You dont live here and see the multiple bridges over the ROW, all the LA Metro property signage, and numerous remenants of the ballast bed in the area!!! Get a job!!!
idkwhatname2use (2026-05-28 00:08:47+00:00): "A borderline case may be where a railway was dismantled and replaced with a road of the same geometry."

This isnt even close to the current status of the ROW. Get a job man stop wasting your life editing all day for ur own sake.
monotar (2026-05-31 21:11:17+00:00): Hallo,

Ich habe gesehen, dass du den Routenverlauf geändert hast. Dazu eine Frage: wie ist der Routenverlauf zwischen Am Oberhof und dem Kloster Mariental, da nun 2 Routen gleichzeitig angegeben sind. Von West nach Ost nur über Klosterstraße und Bergstraße und von Ost nach West nur über Zur Kranichau?

Oder soll es von West nach Ost sowohl über Klosterstraße/Bergstraße und über Zur Kranichau 2 mögliche Routenmöglichkeiten geben? Das würde in der Eintragung nämlich Unterschiede machen.

Grüße
ABeimel (2026-06-01 08:17:22+00:00): Hallo,
danke für die Nachfrage. Mir gefällt die gegenwärtige Darstellung nämlich noch nicht optimal. Es gibt 2 Möglichkeiten auf diesem Teilstück, da die Bergstraße eine Einbahnstraße ist (berechtigterweise, weil sehr eng) und man deshalb von Am Oberhof nicht die kurze Strecke über die Bergstraße nach Sornzig fahren kann/darf. Deshalb ist vor Ort die Ausschilderung so angebracht, dass man von Am Oberhof kommend über Neubaderitz nach Sornzig geführt wird (theoretisch könnte man hier genauso von Sornzig Richtung Am Oberhof fahren). In die Gegenrichtung (von Sornzig kommend) führt die Beschilderung durch die Klosterstraße und Bergstraße, weil das eine sehr schöne Strecke ist (obgleich mit ordentlich Steigung) und sie kürzer ist. Toll würde ich Richtungspfeile auf  den Teilstrecken finden, allein ich weiß nicht, wie das funktioniert. 
Herzliche Grüße und bei weiteren Fragen gern nochmal melden.
monotar (2026-06-01 17:41:28+00:00): Ich habe es mal angepasst und in 2 richtungsabhängige Routenführungen geändert, so bleiben die Daten auch bei den Afragen sauber da es eine geschlossene Route ist. Wird sich in ein paar Tagen auch in der Cyclemap mit den Richtungspfeilen zeigen.

Grüße
ABeimel (2026-06-03 10:20:18+00:00): Herzlichen Dank. Ich habe es mir auch genau angeschaut, damit ich es fürs nächste Mal gleich richtig machen kann.
Schöne Grüße
eggie (2026-05-28 08:06:58+00:00): Hi  Please decrease your editarea. Don't shift the map.This may harm the map.

Greetz,
eggie
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-03 12:36:12+00:00): Is that a gate or a permanent barrier?  If it's a gate, then it should be barrier=gate instead.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183279400
Cordless5246 (2026-06-04 00:03:22+00:00): It is technically a gate but is never opened.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183279400
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-04 01:07:28+00:00): I only noticed because the tire tracks east of the gate.  This might be better tagged as barrier=gate, locked=yes rather than noexit=yes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183279400
Cordless5246 (2026-06-04 01:18:22+00:00): Thank you. I corrected it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183279400
Cordless5246 (2026-06-04 01:24:00+00:00): I removed it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183279400
Minh Nguyen (2026-05-29 18:51:04+00:00): This was a bug in the style you’re looking at, not OSM data. [1] Other renderers like OSM Americana had no problem with the Osage characters. [2]

OSM has a general guideline against inaccurately mapping based on the quirks of a particular data consumer. [4] I’ll revert this change, but please do follow up with the developer to ensure that they fix the issue in their software. Thank you for your understanding.

[1] https://github.com/openstreetmap-carto/openstreetmap-carto/issues/5230
[2] https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/what-s-new-on-the-openstreetmap-website/130080/18
[3] https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/slash-separated-native-american-names/6705/43
[4] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183370223
greatnameguys2472 (2026-05-29 19:45:26+00:00): Acknowledged.
DodoGTA (2026-05-28 06:49:33+00:00): O ar čia ne telefoninio ryšio bokštai? Pažiūrėjau į vieną iš jų su „Mapillary“ ir pamačiau kad jis turi sektorines antenas/„sector antennas“ (kurios yra labai dažnos tokiam ryšiui perduoti)
Snaiperis (2026-05-28 09:38:53+00:00): Iš pradžių 9 bokštai buvo atrinkti pagal vietovės pavadinimą tekste https://placiajuostis.lrv.lt/lt/naujienos/pirmieji-9-nkp-projekto-rysio-bokstai-yra-paruosti-operatoriu-naudojimui/ vėliau kiti pagal projekto nebeegzistuojančio tinklalapio kopiją https://web.archive.org/web/20240326001551/https://www.nkpprojektas.lt/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/NKP-ry%C5%A1io-bok%C5%A1tai-vie%C5%A1inimui-2021-03-25.pdf Suprantu, kad bokštus gali nuomoti įvairiai įrangai statyti tame tarpe ir mobilaus ryšio.
ygcgjp5 (2026-06-04 18:15:12+00:00): Priminimas jog tiesiog metalinės konstrukcijos bokštai yra man_made=mast, o ne tower.
Snaiperis (2026-06-04 23:42:20+00:00): Lietuviškai yra bokštai yra, jei stovi patys. stiebai - jei reikia atotampų iš lynų. Ar čia nenaudojamas toks pats susitarimas? Ji ne, tai daugelis man_made=tower turi būti pakeisti į man_made=mast (išskyrus kelis, kaip kad Aukštaitijos NP, kur turi apžvalgos aikštelę)
Mxdanger (2026-05-28 02:27:52+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183281883
Mxdanger (2026-05-28 02:27:45+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183281883
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-28 07:20:44+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Are the names real?
mueschel (2026-06-04 10:03:05+00:00): Hi,
what does "mothballed:power" mean you added on a power plant?
HashFerret (2026-05-28 02:48:01+00:00): Hi, looks like you removed the 'South' prefix from the name:full tag, which should correctly read 'South State Street.' The standard name tag also happens to be incorrect, 'State St' isn't acceptable since we don't use abbreviations in OSM (you didn't do this, I just noticed it.)

Take a look at the Utah naming conventions on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions

We use the 'South State Street' as a sort of fix for Utah's weird addresses. Since it wouldn't be correct to put '350 South' in the building number field.
bogardpd (2026-05-28 23:03:58+00:00): Thank you for the info! I believe I've now updated them in accordance with the naming conventions, let me know if it still needs correction.
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-28 05:59:37+00:00): #Spam
Mxdanger (2026-05-28 02:30:35+00:00): Master edit can be found here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183280765
DressyPear4 (2026-05-28 13:25:08+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Good_changeset_comments
okadatsuneo_import (2026-05-28 02:41:38+00:00): 51347007 が正
MappingMore (2026-05-31 13:12:48+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183444975
felipeeugenio (2026-05-28 11:32:37+00:00): Hola. Buenas ediciones. Sin embargo por favor no esquematizar los dibujos, hay un puñado de casas en que se ve que son separadas y las agrupó. Hay un ena en que dibujó el building para el predio completo; el tag building= es solo para las estructuras.
Además, si las construccciones están pegadas, dibujarlas pegadas.

El resto todo bien, saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183282692
iriiidio (2026-05-28 11:43:06+00:00): Gracias, corrijo más tarde, saludos!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183282692
felipeeugenio (2026-05-28 11:58:04+00:00): Gracias por responder. Ya corregí todo. Estamos para ayudar.

Por favor integrarse al chat en Telegram de maperos chilenos. Hay varios de Temuco y Rancagua.

El link para unirse está en mi perfil.

Saludos
impiaaa (2026-05-28 18:26:28+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please use the changeset description to describe what you changed and why; for example, "Added the correct name of a café, after visiting." You can find more examples here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Also, if a shop is vacant, it's better to only remove the tags that are no longer applicable than to delete the address entirely, since the address does still exist at that location. An easy way to do this in the built-in iD editor is to use the "Downgrade" action instead of "Delete." Thank you!

(maschinelle Übersetzung:) Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Bitte beschreiben Sie Ihre Änderungen und deren Gründe in der Änderungsbeschreibung. Zum Beispiel: „Nach einem Besuch den korrekten Namen eines Cafés hinzugefügt.“ Weitere Beispiele finden Sie hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments. Falls ein Geschäft leer steht, entfernen Sie bitte nur die nicht mehr zutreffenden Tags, anstatt die Adresse komplett zu löschen, da sie an diesem Standort weiterhin existiert. Im integrierten iD-Editor können Sie dies ganz einfach mit der Aktion „Herabstufen“ anstelle von „Löschen“ erledigen. Vielen Dank!
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-07-06 04:56:26+00:00): شكرا على مساهمتك لكن هذا التحرير للأسف يحتوي على ملاحظات:  
1- أن النظرية بأن "وادي الرمة" هو "نهر فيشون Legendary Pishon river" غير مثبتة بدليل قاطع وهي مجرد نظرية لأحدهم!  
2- أن صور الأقمار الصناعية لا تظهر آثار مسار للوادي/النهر في الواقع!
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-07-06 04:56:50+00:00): تم استرجاع هذا التغيير هنا:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185174269
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-07-06 05:05:57+00:00): والنهر المذكور يسمى في كتبنا بـ"سيحون" أو "سيحان" ولكن لم يذكر تحديداً بأنه في مكان وادي الرمة!
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-07-06 05:06:23+00:00): وجاء في الحديث النبوي "سَيْحانُ، وجيْحانُ، والفُراتُ، والنِّيلُ؛ كلٌّ من أنهارِ الجنةِ"
DaveF (2026-06-05 15:06:46+00:00): This is circular:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89820097
North14 (2026-06-07 08:38:24+00:00): It doesn't look right when the circle is distorted. Thanks for pointing that out. It's been corrected.
user_5359 (2026-05-30 17:29:28+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2qS3. What is the mean of the tags
ID_PRIS = 404
INFO = Safírová
OBJEKT = Přístřešek MHD
TYP = 0
? No other OSM keys.
Thisik (2026-05-31 04:07:49+00:00): Hello, I'm sorry, that was a mistake. These erroneous elements should now be deleted. I got the shelter geometry from a city source and forgot to remove these nodes with source tags. Thanks for the warning!
user_5359 (2026-05-31 09:33:25+00:00): Hello, you miss node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13890357164.
vanagaudi (2026-05-31 16:41:19+00:00): Kürze keine Namen ab, die auch ohne Abkürzung geschrieben werden können.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Abk%C3%BCrzungen
Znaika (2026-05-28 06:45:43+00:00): Hi SaPatz, in OSM werden die Straßen zu Str. nicht abgekürzt. Dafür gibt es hier einen Eintrag official_name:de
Sieh OSM-Wiki!
Gruß, Znaika
渤海西岸 (2026-05-28 05:49:54+00:00): 近期白官屯境内先不要动，我还有一个存档没上传
Darnight14 (2026-05-28 08:50:07+00:00): 怎么存档？编辑完不上传吗？
渤海西岸 (2026-05-28 09:26:12+00:00): josm的文件保存到本地，随时保存
woodpeck (2026-06-09 18:24:29+00:00): Dear Erick tamba, please note that any data imports and uploading of AI-detected building outlines has to go through a community approval process as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import - this clearly hasn't happened with your recent building uploads.
jorchr (2026-05-28 05:39:56+00:00): Error fix of inners, not wetlands. Sorry.
vanagaudi (2026-05-31 16:27:23+00:00): Abkürzungen sind bei Straßennamen nicht zu verwenden, auch wenn dies der offiziellen Schreibweise entspricht:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#Abk%C3%BCrzungen_(nicht_verwenden!)