piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rempshaener (2025-10-15 18:59:37+00:00): Hallo,
auch hier: bitte „couplings“ rausnehmen.
Und den Haken "Überprüfungsbitte" vielleicht etwas seltener und bei kritischen Fällen setzen.   
Viele Grüße
gscscnd (2025-10-17 15:41:25+00:00): Nie wiem, o to akurat chyba się nie czepiałem.
kamasytrix (2025-10-14 20:04:41+00:00): Додайте не тільке назву, а приставу вулиця провулок
user_5359 (2025-10-16 16:52:40+00:00): Hello! What is the mean of the keys
behavior
class (has been labeled as deprecated)
ecosystem
habitat (Proposal status:	Abandoned )
order
phylum
substrate
?
What is the licence of the data source?
user_5359 (2025-10-26 09:39:25+00:00): I would like an answer to the question about the licence for the data and its significance.

Me gustaría obtener una respuesta a la pregunta sobre la licencia de los datos y su significado.
Midas_Broken_Touch (2025-10-26 13:12:12+00:00): Hello, good morning. I am currently out of the country without my coworkers, so I cannot respond in a very detailed manner. However, I can tell you that the data is taken personally with field exploration.
If you have more specific questions, please leave them and I will pass them on to my team.
user_5359 (2025-10-26 18:05:27+00:00): As described, keys were used in these imports whose meanings were not defined. Since the (presumed) plants are actually well described in the wiki, the need for new keys is of course questionable. But enjoy your holiday first, that's the priority. I'm glad you've already given me some feedback.
user_5359 (2025-12-28 10:40:46+00:00): Hello! Have you or any of your colleagues been able to clarify or document the meaning of the keys used?
CurlingMan13 (2025-10-15 03:06:23+00:00): Is "114 Bayard Street" the actual name of this or is it just the address?

As mentioned before, a name is only a name and not an address.

What source did you use for the name?
Frank Peng (2025-11-14 07:13:20+00:00): What do you mean by "no restriction"? In this changeset, you removed a way from the Northlake suburb relation. The way that you removed from the relation appears to be a suburb line for Northlake, Charlotte, NC.
Frank Peng (2025-12-17 16:06:41+00:00): This borough/suburb relation that you broke in this changeset has been fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174636140. Would you care to explain what motivated this change?
HellMap (2025-10-17 14:09:51+00:00): Čau,

Gribēju pieminēt, ka datumus vajadzētu likt ISO formātā YYYY-MM-DD, citādi tie datos nav saprotami, ja parsētājam nav zināms konkrētās valsts vietējais datumu formāts.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Date_specification#Single_date
rusjanis (2025-10-17 17:59:43+00:00): A ok, ja vari pielabo, es rīt tik tikšu pie PC
Paldies! 😊
Taya_S (2025-12-22 16:17:07+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176271486
Baloo Uriza (2025-10-14 20:22:54+00:00): This camera is located in the street and replaced the traffic signals?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173291904
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-10-20 13:46:02+00:00): Hi Sheikh Salah,
I have seen that you have deleted East and West Jerusalem:
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/13958423

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/13958424

but I can not find any source for this claim of yours. Could you provide some official source for this change?
Sheikh Salah (2025-10-22 15:28:08+00:00): Hello,
Israel annexed east Jerusalem in 1967 after the 6 days war. 
Jerusalem has only one municipality, service the entire city. Theres no "east" or "west" municipalities.
This is the situation on ground, what official source you looking for?
Sheikh Salah (2025-10-22 15:33:24+00:00): Here is the official site of Jerusalem Municipality. In this page, which lists the neighborhoods of the city, you will neighborhoods from all over the city.
https://www.jerusalem.muni.il/en/neighborhoods/
Sheikh Salah (2025-10-22 15:35:21+00:00): this is the GIS site of the muni, you will find data for the entire city
https://jergisng.jerusalem.muni.il/baseWab/?config=../gisviewerngsupport/api/InjectingConfig&locale=en
Taya_S (2025-12-22 16:42:30+00:00): I have reverted this changeset for now. I ask Sheikh Salah to first start a forum discussion before making widespread changes to highly contentious objects around Israel.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176272534
bartgron (2025-10-15 17:58:41+00:00): Zestaw zmian błędny, wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173332191
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-10-18 00:04:43+00:00): Really? !  this small unclassified way in a small village have a one way sign ? !
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173292178
K12230LF (2025-11-18 15:10:06+00:00): Salut Britz, je n'arrive pas trop à lire l'historique, mais j'ai l'impression que l'Avenue de la République n'est plus lié à la Rue Guillaume Bertrand et la Rue Servan. Et ton nom apparaît sur certains noeuds, comme celui-ci : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12757420381
Britzz (2025-11-18 21:06:48+00:00): oui, c'est la réalité, il y a maintenant un trottoir qui sépare les chaussées, il n'y a plus de passage de voitures possible
Martinligabue (2025-10-16 08:38:54+00:00): ciao, ho corretto l'orario in modo che sia leggibile dalle app, era quasi giusto, bastava usare il trattino per indicare i giorni "da-a" ed è implicito che è chiuso quando non c'è invece l'orario per un giorno. intanto grazie!
HugoC01 (2025-10-15 18:24:31+00:00): J'ai fait des photos Mapillary depuis les bords de Saône pendant l'incendie
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-15 02:22:46+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13233519319
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106101018

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Joseph R P (2025-10-16 00:51:26+00:00): Hello—what is "Jax's Dead Spot"? This doesn't appear to be an actual town or populated place of any sort. If this is just a made-up location, please note that fictional mapping is considered disruptive and could result in getting you blocked from editing the site. It is important not to treat OpenStreetMap as a space for personal projects but as a collaborative mapping project. Additionally, a lot of the other things you've edited thus far appear to be incorrect—particularly changing nearly every populated place in the Jacksonville metro area to a 'city' and some seemingly random non-freeway roadways, like Zoo Parkway and Emerson Street, to motorways. Note that the city tag should only applied to a significant populated place of regional prominence with a large population, like Jacksonville, St. Augustine, Gainesville, etc. As for the motorway tag, this should only be used on freeways such as I 95, 295, or the First Coast Expressway.
JeroenHoek (2025-10-15 07:04:57+00:00): Beetje voorbarig om daar al de straten in te tekenen zonder construction:

https://oud.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=brtachtergrondkaart&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=15-10-2024&loc=53.20321%2C5.838694%2C19z&marker=loc&acqdate=2025-10-01&acqid=20251001_105931_PNEO-04_7_1&sensor=Pleiades-NEO

Die brug ligt er ook niet.
Sander H (2025-10-15 07:56:21+00:00): Die brug was de oude service weg die er al lag, maar verbinding lijkt idd te worden opgeschoven tov de laatste beelden. Op 2025 foto's was die nieuwe doorsteek ook al te zien, maar is de brug er ook nog.  Construction laat ik er wel vaker vanaf als de wegen doodlopen en geen risiso is voor verkeerd gerouteerd verkeer tijdens de bouw. Voorkomt dat het nog jaren op constuctie blijft staan in gebieden waar minder mappers actief zijn om de boel tijdig weer open te gooien.
JeroenHoek (2025-10-15 08:01:10+00:00): Het duurt nog maanden voordat hier iemand kan komen nu het nog een gesloten bouwterrein is, dat is ook niet de bedoeling. Laat dan de wegen gewoon achterwege. Je hoeft geen voorschot te nemen op de verre toekomst.
eggie (2025-10-15 06:05:09+00:00): Dag Rene,

Het lijkt me inconsistent getagd. Op de velden staat VV Wolfersveen, maar op het clubhuis VV Wolversveen.
Het lijkt me ook een overkill van namen. Het clubhuis zou voldoende moeten zijn.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-15 06:07:44+00:00): Aangepast
Rene1974 (2025-10-15 11:26:10+00:00): Dank je. Het clubhuis had ik even gemist. Inderdaad is één keer taggen voldoende, maar de naam stond hier al op de velden. Vandaar dat ik het had aangepast.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-12 03:19:02+00:00): Reverted SEO spam POI in a private residential dwelling with no likely verifiable location on the ground in changeset 183996695

https://osm.org/changeset/183996695
Hydrochloric (2025-10-14 21:15:20+00:00): Also, added vet hospital, but forgot to do it in this change: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173294222
i2004 (2025-10-15 00:58:54+00:00): https://x.com/VivamosVL/status/1978234129712898243
HirschKauz (2025-11-09 09:15:01+00:00): Hi!  
beim nächsten Mal bitte in der Note vermerken mit welchen Changeset Du es erledigt hast, und dann bitte auch die Note schließen ;-) 
Grüße und weiter viel Spaß
Peer van Daalen (2025-11-09 09:39:52+00:00): Danke und ein kleiner Sonntagslacher  :-))) ...

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/die-schonsten-kunstwerke-im-offentlichen-raum/120513/30
Hufkratzer (2025-10-15 20:29:20+00:00): Hi,
du hast hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/564119116 als Reitanlage umgetaggt; es war vorher als Wiese/Weide getaggt und es steht noch name=Koppel dran. Im Luftbild kann ich nicht erkennen, was da ist; es scheinen in dem Bereich mehrere kleine Bereiche, evtl. Paddocks, zu sein. Was ist da? Kannst du das korrigieren?
Eine Reitanlage ist es nicht; die Reitanlage ist in diesem Fall das komplette Gelände vom Reiterverein Onkel Toms Hütte.  Insofern ist es auch nicht optimal, dass das Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23125168 als diese Reitanlage  getaggt ist. Es wäre am besten, man würde die Reitanlage so mappen wie z.B. hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/921065670, also das komplette Gelände was dazugehört. Oder wenn das zu kompliziert sein sollte, als extra Knoten, Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10675059794.
Jedenfalls sollte man nicht zwei Reitanlagen mappen wo in Wirklichkeit nur eine ist.
Hufkratzer (2025-10-18 09:33:50+00:00): So wie es jetzt ist, ist es besser :)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-12 03:20:51+00:00): Reverted SEO spam POI in a private residential dwelling with no apparent verifiable location on the ground in changeset 183996718

https://osm.org/changeset/183996718
george1201 (2025-10-15 21:40:56+00:00): Wenn ich mir das Foto im Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5001165 ansehe und mit der Wiki-Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:barrier vergleiche, dann sieht das doch eher nach barrier=parking_lock aus.
Radboss (2025-10-16 21:58:42+00:00): Danke! In der Tat, das passt noch besser. Hab's entsprechend angepasst.
dp7 (2025-10-15 16:47:50+00:00): Ciao Andrea, posso chiederti come mai hai abbassato la scala da E a T ?
Andrea Del Sarto (2025-10-16 08:02:15+00:00): Ciao dp7,

la modifica è stata fatta sulla base delle linee guida CAI/OSM in merito all'inserimento dei percorsi escursionistici; puoi trovare i dettagli qui https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI
In particolare relativamente alla difficoltà escursionistica la delibera CC n. 89 del 20 novembre 2021 (classificazione dei percorsi in base alla difficoltà in ambito escursionistico e
cicloescursionistico) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Cai_scale; dove vengono elencati le caratteristiche tecniche per la classificazione.
Sulla base delle caratteristiche tecniche ricade in quella classificazione.

saluti
dp7 (2025-10-16 08:30:03+00:00): Ok, grazie per la risposta.
Il mio dubbio nasce dal fatto che, anche se non percorro questo itinerario da un po’, lo ricordo più vicino alla classificazione E che non alla T. Inoltre, dopo il mio ultimo passaggio in zona, ci sono stati alcuni eventi alluvionali che potrebbero aver peggiorato le condizioni del sentiero; per questo, prudenzialmente, avrei ritenuto più appropriata la E.
L'aggiornamento che hai fatto si basa solo sui dati tecnici derivati da OSM o anche su altri fattori ?
Grazie !
Andrea Del Sarto (2025-11-14 13:38:21+00:00): su dati tecnici. 
il percorso è una strada o un sentiero? 
se ci sono degli eventi che ne pregiudicato il passaggio ci sono tag appositi (state o access per la relazione)
Il concetto di prudenzialmente non può essere applicato alla difficoltà escursionistica, è un dato oggettivo e definito dalle linee guida
dp7 (2025-11-15 16:49:38+00:00): Il percorso è prevalentemente su una vecchia stradina forestale, con fondo malconcio e tratti piuttosto ripidi. E' giusto il ragionamento del "dato oggettivo", ma se per linee guida ti riferisci alla pagina che hai linkato nel changeset e alla proposal relativa alla scala escursionistica ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Cai_scale ) , allora ci sta anche la E. Altrimenti ti prego di indicarmi a quali fai riferimento, così posso approfondire e regolarmi di conseguenza. Grazie !!
iandees (2025-10-14 23:09:40+00:00): 🐝
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-12 03:21:59+00:00): Reverted SEO spam POI in a private residential dwelling with no apparent verifiable location on the ground in changeset 183996750

https://osm.org/changeset/183996750
Warin61 (2026-03-02 00:58:16+00:00): What is the 'Smallwood Estate'?

Looks to me like these group of building are individual properties that can be purchased individually .. with individual; addresses. Perhaps they were developed as a lot but once sold this 'estate' ceased to be?

In any case the relation has no outer so it does not make OSM sense.
❤️‍🔥 (2026-03-02 11:46:55+00:00): the linked wikidata entry answers this question with a surprisingly detailed answer. so i've restored the relation
DMMeYourCurbCuts (2025-10-24 01:45:56+00:00): Hello! You requested a review of this edit.

Looks good, but one thing you could do is to explicitly mark the opening hours on Saturday and Sunday. If it's closed on those days, you can do "Sa-Su off" after the last semicolon.
PWSpaces (2025-10-24 18:17:32+00:00): Thanks for the tip. It was my first time and I just tried update a few small items. In the case of the ours, I think I just used what they offered in the drop-down. But, I'll make sure to use the Sa-Su off in the future. Thanks.
DMMeYourCurbCuts (2025-10-24 18:24:56+00:00): Happy to help!

I noticed that you were missing a semicolon between days of the week. I just added that for you. Opening hours formatting is weird at first for sure.
PWSpaces (2025-10-24 18:42:24+00:00): Thanks.
I have about 80 locations that are not listed on this map. How do I add them in bulk?
DMMeYourCurbCuts (2025-10-24 18:58:32+00:00): Let me check into that and see if I can get some solid advice for you. Would you mind messaging me on OpenStreetMap (not in this changeset, as it's public) with your email address so I can follow up with you there?
matthewfecica (2025-10-15 02:06:47+00:00): Hilltop Hanover is definitely not a "nature reserve". The boundary that I added was incomplete, and I never got around to adding the western part of the park, which compromises the majority of the park. It is a farm/museum, and similar to Muscoot Farm Park.
matthewfecica (2025-10-15 02:09:07+00:00): Onatru Park and Preserve is one park, that is the official name of the place. There is just the road that cuts through the park. The name should be corrected  and the place has sports fields so that makes it a park

https://www.lewisborony.gov/media/23571
ZLima12 (2025-10-15 02:17:42+00:00): As for Hilltop Hanover: the current boundary seems like it would definitely fall under leisure=nature_reserve, since it is natural. If the boundary were to be changed to extend across the street and include the farm section, it would admittedly feel strange to call the whole thing a nature reserve. I would be interested in having the community improve the tagging scheme here.

As for Onatru Park and Preserve: this seems to fit the "front of park"/"back of park" scheme that was discussed in the Cranberry Lake changeset. If we were to follow that, then the area with the sports fields would get leisure=park, but the outer boundary would still be boundary=protected_area perhaps with leisure=nature_reserve. Again, using leisure=nature_reserve on the outside here does feel a little weird to me, but that seems to be the usual tagging at the moment.
matthewfecica (2025-10-15 02:35:54+00:00): Well for Hilltop the boundary is not complete. Since the road cuts through the park, I only had a chance to add the eastern half. I still had the western part and then had to tie them in with a multipolygon relation. 

And you were quick to change it to "your way" before the complete boundary was even added.
ZLima12 (2025-10-15 02:46:09+00:00): The general consensus in the previous changeset is that an area like the east part of Hilltop Hanover can not be leisure=park. That is why I changed it to leisure=nature_reserve. Following the "front of park"/"back of park" scheme, the outer border here would be boundary=protected_area perhaps with leisure=nature_reserve, while the farm section would be tagged separately.

Again, I would like to see a tagging scheme that works better for these borderline cases, rather than calling the whole thing either a leisure=park or a leisure=nature_reserve. But currently, it seems like this is what the consensus is.
matthewfecica (2025-10-15 02:51:53+00:00): So for Hilltop why don't you correct your mistake and do what you suggested?
ZLima12 (2025-10-15 02:59:26+00:00): I don't believe I made a mistake; that section is properly tagged as leisure=nature_reserve. The data just isn't complete, so a multipolygon can be created as you mentioned and then the leisure=nature_reserve and boundary=protected_area can be moved to that.

Hilltop Hanover Farm is already mapped as a landuse=farmyard subarea. I'm not familiar with farm tagging so I don't know if that's the usual way to do it.
ZeLonewolf (2025-10-15 12:35:23+00:00): Hi folks, 
What ZLima12 is describing is the US consensus on how such areas should be mapped.  Comments like "your way" and "fix your mistake" are unhelpful. If you would like to debate the merits of how parks and nature reserves are tagged in OSM, please do so on the community forum, at https://community.openstreetmap.org/
ZeLonewolf (2025-10-15 12:43:32+00:00): Ref: DWG Ticket#2025101510000281
fortera_au (2025-10-14 23:41:25+00:00): DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173296868
matthewfecica (2025-10-15 00:26:01+00:00): For Onatru, the official name is 'Onatru Farm Park and Preserve'. The park is cut in half by the road, but they are both part of the same park, so the names should be consistent.

https://www.lewisborony.gov/media/23571
fortera_au (2025-10-14 23:41:26+00:00): DWG revert: revert tag changes against community consensus

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173296868
matthewfecica (2025-10-15 00:19:28+00:00): For Onatru, the official name is 'Onatru Farm Park and Preserve'. The park is cut in half by the road, but they are both part of the same park, so the names should be consistent. 

https://www.lewisborony.gov/media/23571
fortera_au (2025-10-15 00:22:59+00:00): Please discuss this with the community on the most recent changeset regarding that object (other than this one), or on the community forum.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-09 10:08:20+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13233757537/history has shop = drinks that was added in this edit
shop=drinks ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=beverages ? If yes, what is the difference? Should we document this shop value as distinct, valid and useful?
pesticides (2025-10-29 23:49:04+00:00): Is there actually a separated cycle path running next to 132nd Ave NE/Slater Ave? Last time I was here a month or two ago, it was just a regular bike lane.
deusjz (2025-10-30 04:28:10+00:00): Is the Cycle Path specification specifically for separated cycling infrastructure? I was under the impression it was dual purpose to mark painted bike lanes as well as separated lanes.
pesticides (2025-10-31 02:45:34+00:00): It is. Painted bike lanes that are part of the roadway are always mapped using the `cycleway=lane` tag on the road itself. Separated or protected bike lanes that run alongside a road can either be mapped as a separate `highway=cycleway` or as a `cycleway=track` tag on the road itself.

If you aren't sure which to use, consider whether a cyclist could easily switch between the bike infrastructure and the main travel lanes while riding. If so, it should generally be mapped using the `cycleway` tag on the road.

There's a more detailed guide at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle#Cycle_features
user_5359 (2025-10-15 06:46:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You seem to be having problems finding your way to an address. If you need this for a drawing, do not enter it in the data. Check whether the address is entered correctly (at the main building, not on the way to the house). If you need help finding the correct approach, just get in touch.
MrYadro (2025-10-15 10:00:52+00:00): Почему на точке адрес?
MrYadro (2025-10-15 11:50:26+00:00): А, понял, два адреса у дома
kosmgeolan (2025-10-16 01:01:13+00:00): Здравствуйте. Я пыталась понять какой правильный. Пусть стоит оба адреса. Разберемся со временем.
user_5359 (2025-10-15 17:09:52+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2dJS. What is the mean of the key Upper_Number?

If you want to draw a separate node for each address, please read up on addr:interpolation (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Addresses#Buildings_with_multiple_house_numbers
Undearius (2025-10-15 21:30:28+00:00): My apologies, that's a holdover from the original data and shouldn't have made it through to the upload. The intention is to have each address as individual nodes rather than using interpolations.

Part of my work flow is to filter for those tags but I seem to have missed a few and even completely forgot at some point. I will go back and take care if them. Thank you for pointing it out.
i2004 (2025-10-16 01:28:33+00:00): porque magnolias ?
AgusQui (2025-10-16 03:07:03+00:00): Así se llama el barrio donde está la terminal, ponerle José León Suárez por las 4 cuadras que se mete dentro de éste, lejos del centro, no tiene sentido.
mcliquid (2025-10-15 07:15:16+00:00): Hey there,

I have a nice tip for you: keep your changesets local.

Trust me, it will save you a lot of trouble and make your reviewers happy. Here’s what you need to do:
• stick to one area at a time (like a city, a district or a province)
• don’t cross the border (unless you have a passport)
• upload/save your changes before you hop to another place

Why? Because size matters when it comes to changesets. Don’t believe me? Check out this wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for listening, have a wonderful day and enjoy mapping!
valaise (2025-12-09 17:18:54+00:00): Hi, what street-level imagery was used to observe the Bailey Avenue protected bike lane?

I am primarily trying to understand the designated bicycle routing through the intersection with W 230th St.