piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
LateNightTone (2023-11-16 17:07:48+00:00): Hi Mackerski, I just spotted your edit. I had thought from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:expressway that this road met all the requirements of an expressway? Essentially that it has full access control and isn't a motorway. It's a step beyond dual carriageway (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:dual_carriageway%3Dyes), due to its grade separation and lack of local exits, except for a few highway maintenance roads which are LILO. 

For routing, it seems worthwhile having one or other, but expressway seems more suitable to me, or is there a different consensus on this? (I did have a hoke around the Ireland Roads wiki pages but didn't find anything.)

For another example - it's in use on the new A6 in NI: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/601375429#map=14/54.7439/-6.3959
CorruptComputer (2023-11-01 01:45:08+00:00): This is to resolve a note, should have waited to close it in iD so it would be in the changeset tags but I closed this before I made the edit and didn't want to reopen it just for that.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3956232
Matt_ (2023-11-03 03:30:14+00:00): Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_National_Inventory_of_Dams
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-11 03:05:22+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143450132
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-03 23:35:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 143594900 where the changeset comment is: revert proto-vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-03 23:35:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 143594900 where the changeset comment is: revert proto-vandalism
MxxCon (2023-11-01 03:08:30+00:00): Hello.
These features names don't seem to be proper.
They seem to be more a description, and as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions that's not appropriate to do.
Furthermore, description that these are transmission lines is already encoded in tags. Similar with the line voltage, it's already in relevant tags.
These issues should be addressed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143450249
ljc_jlyb (2023-11-01 12:26:41+00:00): Hi, thanks for fixing all those errors. However, changesets are recommended to be local, which means if you want to make some changes over several countries, you should make 1 changeset per country. Thank you.
l-nz (2023-11-01 17:52:31+00:00): Okay, thanks for this remark, I will keep it in mind for the next time!
rskedgell (2023-11-01 10:27:01+00:00): Thanks for updating this, I'd meant to do it ages ago.

Is this node potentially a duplicate of the adjacent building?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226271440
donmac703 (2023-11-06 07:32:45+00:00): Possibly, but that wasn't a factor in the edit. The misspelled attribute value change was to simply reflect the original author's intent (and thereby improve the map).
rskedgell (2023-11-06 08:58:14+00:00): Thanks. I'll be down there next Sunday, so I'll check whether the object has been duplicated.
CoyKoi (2023-11-02 09:59:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thank you for your edits. I have reviewed this changeset can propose the following improvements: ideally the address tags should be only on either the address node, or on the building feature, but not both (premise is to try not to duplicate information across multiple features). Secondly, the new building feature you've create is overlapping with the already exisiting building, which isn't very clean. I would suggest splitting up the rest of the building sections into their own building features, or look into using the building:part tag instead (which are intended to overlap with building features).
Cheers, keep it up
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143451226
ferchoyamaha (2023-11-01 03:14:41+00:00): Hola buenas noches como hago para agregar una imagen del mapa aqui
CurlingMan13 (2023-11-02 00:47:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  It looks like you made some of the common pitfalls when mapping golf courses on OSM.  Specifically, golf cartpaths should be tagged as cartpaths, not service roads.  Additionally, areas should not partially overlap.  I have gone ahead and fixed these.  Please review to avoid these mistakes in the future.

Read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-06 07:32:44+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3974804 ?

It seems misplaced
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-06 07:33:08+00:00): And https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11303761208 - is it really so close to roads?