piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2023-06-08 23:39:54+00:00): Hello,
In this change you've increased the san_scale for https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/839038651 from alpine_hiking to difficult_alpine_hiking.  Was that deliberate?
Best Regards,
Andy
SK53 (2023-06-09 13:35:00+00:00): I think this is now overgraded. T5 is not something likely to be encountered on any widely used 'path' in the Lakes or most other places in the British Isles.

Lord's Rake is (or certainly) was an unpleasant ascent, and it does have some objective dangers over recent years from rock fall etc. This gives a good feel for the crux on a standard T5 route https://www.hikr.org/gallery/photo2405005.html?post_id=122152#1. A steeply angled slab with exposure down to a glacier. This is significant harder than anything on Lord's Rake.

I realise that the SAC Scale may be interpreted differently in the UK, but in the longer term it is better to keep to the original definition. Not only does this help consistency, but will not result in British hikers being misled as to what the T4, T5 and T6 alpine hiking grades actually entail.
AWMapper (2023-06-09 14:01:15+00:00): Hello both,

thank you for your constructive comments on this change. 

This change was made in consultation with staff who have a lot of experience working on the ground in this area. We attempted to interpret the SAC Scale and apply it as appropriate. 
As it appears, from the feedback, that we've over estimated the SAC Scale I'll revert to the original grading.

Many thanks.
SK53 (2023-06-16 13:38:16+00:00): Thanks, I forgot to mention that I did recently look at grading of paths in the Lakes (after the Barf incident around Christmas) and wrote a couple of entries about them:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SK53/diary/400702
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SK53/diary/400712
http://sk53-osm.blogspot.com/2023/01/a-little-surprise-hidden-in-os.html

The key difference between T4 & T5 is that the latter involves some (easy) 3-point climbing technique at some point. So Broad Stand is probably a good candidate for T5 if it were mapped.

Elsewhere in Britain experienced hiking guides have done some good work on checking the harder routes: such as on An Teallach. There were some good threads on mastodon (linked in my posts). So I think we are collectively working towards consistent usage of these scales in the UK. A bit harder to know if these are consistent with usage elsewhere.

One point is that the T4- and T4+ values could be used if there is a need to separate alternatives which are of different character. At present the Foxes Tarn ascent of Scafell is graded T3 so this is not needed.

I'm also very pleased about the action concerning the short-cut path marked bypassing the col at Broad Pike (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086252957#map=17/54.45589/-3.21152&layers=D).

Jerry aka SK53
eggie (2023-04-24 09:55:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Ik ken geen fietspaden in Nederland waar een max snelheid is van 20 km/h
bicycle=yes hoeft niet op een fietspad, motor_vehicle=no is ook default.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-04-24 10:13:03+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. 
Waarom mogen fietsers niet afslaan naar de Oude Doetinchemseweg

Er staat nu een afslagbeperking op met alleen rechtdoor. Dat zal toch niet?
eggie (2023-04-24 10:26:30+00:00): De afslagbeperking heb ik verwijderd.
De tagging van het fietspad aangepast.
horse=yes verwijderd of staat er een bord ruiters toegestaan?
foot=use_sidepath verwijderd. (foutje van voorgaande mapper) 
oneway=no verwijderd.
motor_vehicle=no verwijderd (Dat hoeft niet)
maxspeed=20 verwijderd.
In het begin is OSM een beetje een soort rijstebrij.

Veel plezier met mappen.
eggie
Branko Kokanovic (2023-11-19 11:32:14+00:00): Jel si siguran da je https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/770368201 broj 29, a na 37? Ja cu da izbrisem ref:RS:kucni_broj sa ove adrese, da ne smeta ako je stvarno 29
eggie (2023-04-24 10:05:02+00:00): Dag Tijmen..


Of dit nog correct routeert met al die aanpassingen?  Ik heb m'n grote vraagtekens.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=135293790

Algemeen access	=permissive?
Welk bord staat hier bij de brug.

Een landbouwsluis wordt vaak getagd met barrier=bus_trap
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dbus_trap

motor_vehicle=designated  

Dat hoeft niet op een reguliere weg en zet dit juist open voor regulier autoverkeer.
name=Ophaalbrug Laag-Keppel staat al op het vlak?
Wat is de straatnaam. 



Kortom .. graag reactie
Welk bord staat er bij de brug?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-04-24 10:41:18+00:00): Reverted by changeset #135295816

Ik heb je wijzigingen voorlopig teruggezet. Er zijn zoveel tegenstrijdigheden.
Wanneer hier een landbouwsluis is gekomen zal die op een node getagd moeten worden.
Ook willen we weten op welke tijden die sluis gesloten is voor regulier verkeer.
Laat maar weten dan kan ik wel helpen bij de juiste tagging.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-04-24 10:42:07+00:00): https://www.gelderland.nl/wegwerkzaamheden/n814-hummelo-laag-keppel
eggie (2023-04-24 10:54:32+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast.. Graag na de proefperiode de bussluis verwijderen
en motor_vehicle:conditional= no @ (2023 Mrt 20-2023 Jun 20) van de 
het stukje N weg verwijderen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-04-24 10:06:12+00:00): Allke begin is moeilijk, maar dit is niet correct. Er is een adresnode. We taggen niet nogmaals een adres op het gebouw zelf.


MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-04-24 10:09:10+00:00): Dag Tijmen...  
We proberen specifiek te taggen.
Zie wiki.. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:surface

In dit geval dus surface=paving_stones

Groet
eggie
gscholz (2023-04-25 05:53:42+00:00): Hi 58zarali,
this changeset has creates errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting and overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=41.51489&lat=40.80380&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=135294346

Can you please fix this?

As you may know, this kind of errors irritate routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Kind regards
Guido
58zarali (2023-04-25 16:41:44+00:00): Hi Guido

I removed the dual paths. Can you check again? Is there any problem left?
gscholz (2023-04-26 05:33:00+00:00): Hi 58zarali, 
thanks for your response, have the way is done now:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=41.51651&lat=40.79937&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Guido
user_5359 (2023-04-26 06:38:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice you add mostly foreign keys! If you need help to correct this, you are welcome.
chris66 (2023-05-05 18:37:43+00:00): Hi,
die Wäscherei an gleicher Stelle existiert noch?
Ropino (2023-05-08 09:18:39+00:00): Hi,
meine Änderung war, den addr:street-Wert (Str. -> Straße) zu ändern. Deine Frage kann ich nicht beantworten.
VG
eggie (2023-04-27 19:37:49+00:00): Dag F4   

Dit lijkt me prima zo.

MVG
eggie
ChehrehBargi (2023-04-27 11:42:01+00:00): User User yashar turanli@
Zanjan is a city in the Islamic Republic of Iran and the official language here is Persian. We are obliged to register the tag according to the official language of that place.
You also remove the Kurdish language. What is the reason for this?
bxl-forever (2023-04-24 11:17:39+00:00): Hello,

Too good to be true, sadly.

There is a connector to enter the station, but it does not go immediately to the platform.  The railway platforms are elevated: connecting them to the street would fool navigation software into believing there is a direct access.
I fixed this: navigation will still work fine but will follow the normal itinerary, i.e. through the station, and stairs to the platform.

Have a nice day.
champs-libres (2023-04-24 12:04:19+00:00): Hello, 

Sure, I know that there is a difference of levels between platforms and the street: that's why I added the level=0 tag on this footway, so it intersects the platform but does not share the same levels. Do you think my change was acceptable ?

Thanks for looking at this!
juminet
bxl-forever (2023-04-24 14:40:57+00:00): That would mostly depend how the router is built.  I wouldn’t bet on this, as most of those I know will assume that, as soon as there is a node in common, people could walk from one to the other.

Don’t worry, it was easy to fix.
ChehrehBargi (2023-04-27 10:56:26+00:00): Hello
User yashar turanli@
In the cities of Miandoab, Qazvin, Ardabil, Zanjan, Urmia, and Tabriz, you have changed the official name of the city from Farsi to Azerbaijani. These cities are part of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the official language in this country is Persian. You have repeated your work in addition to the warnings given to you.
ChehrehBargi (2023-04-27 10:16:21+00:00): User yashar turanli@
You have used the official language of Azerbaijan in the name tag for this city, if you do not have the right to do so according to the rules of the OASM wiki. This city is a part of the territory of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the official language in Iran is Persian. You have repeated this in change packages 134846631 and 134963872 and 135041207 and 135295182 and you have not responded to my notes. In addition, you have removed the name of this city in Kurdish language. I consider this your work as vandalism and I have to report you.
eggie (2023-04-27 19:31:13+00:00): Dag F4DW

Alle begin is moeilijk, maar hier heb een weg op een weg geplakt. 
Dat werkt niet. 

De weg staat toch al vermeld als asfaltweg?

surface=asphalt
Het is gewoon een verharde weg van de laagste categorie.
highway=track
tracktype=grade1
surface=asphalt

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-04-24 10:57:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-04-24 10:59:10+00:00): Beste AddNosje,

Het gebied van je edits is zo groot geworden omdat je een voetpad hebt vastgemaakt aan de woongrens van Doetinchem

Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=135296211

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-04-24 11:04:41+00:00): Het trottoir heb ik lsogemaakt van de landuse residential
Bedenk wel dat als je langs al die wegen aparte trottoirs gaat mappen dat het niet allemaal meer goed routeert. Je zit dan vaak gevangen op zo'n voetpad.
Probeer maar eens over te steken ergens. 
Gebruikelijker is dan om de tagging op te nemen met sidewalk-right of left in het naastgelegen fietspad of hoofdrijbaan.
Consensus is er nog niet, maar kij dan goed dat je voldoende verbindingen maakt.
Zie
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk

MVG
eggie
AddNosje (2023-04-24 11:06:56+00:00): Bedankt voor de tip, zal ik voortaan doen!
CartoNex (2023-04-27 17:31:32+00:00): ¡Hola! Cuidado con no dejar sin cerrar la ZEC-ZEPA Alto Tajo :)
Seraq (2023-04-28 07:10:55+00:00): Muchas gracias por el aviso Elmo12. ¿lo has solucionado?

Saludos,

Seraq
CartoNex (2023-04-28 07:20:21+00:00): Si ya la he cerrado !

Un saludo :)
Yunkers (2023-04-24 11:41:54+00:00): Jeśli wiesz że poprzednie prędkości były złe to lepszym pomysłem byłoby po prostu dodanie prawidłowych wartości. Zwłaszcza, że to nie pierwszy raz kiedy wycofujesz taką zmianę, więc oszczędziłbyś sobie roboty na przyszłość :)
olo81 (2023-04-24 11:48:19+00:00): Niestety wiem, tylko że w jakimś punkcie nie ma znaków ograniczających prędkość. Zakładam, że nie można ufać użytkownikowi, który nagminnie wprowadza błędne dane i lepiej skasować wszystkie ograniczenia, które dodaje.
Yunkers (2023-04-24 12:05:49+00:00): Problem w tym, że poprzednie ograniczenia które wycofywywaleś były wprowadzone przez innego użytkownika. Skąd pewność że dodane ograniczenie były złe, skoro nie wiesz jakie są dobre?
olo81 (2023-04-24 12:11:30+00:00): Wiem, że w danym miejscu nie ma znaków ograniczających prędkość. 
Ale nie wiem, czy na całej długości ulicy takich znaków nie ma. Jeśli użytkownik nie kwapi się, żeby poprawić a zgłaszanie takich użytkowników nie przynosi rezultatów.  Usuwam zestaw zmian.
Yunkers (2023-04-24 12:36:14+00:00): Przyjąłeś bardzo dziwną metodę. Nie ma zresztą problemu w zaznaczeniu prędkości chociażby na fragmencie drogi, na którym wiesz jaka ta prędkość jest. Nie trzeba od razu całej drogi. Sprawa byłaby jaśniejsza, a i dodałbyś coś od siebie. Chyba nie warto zawsze iść po linii najmniejszego oporu...
olo81 (2023-04-24 12:45:04+00:00): Problem w tym że jeden z użytkowników masowo wprowadzał takie edycje.  Prawdopodobnie to jego multikonto. Było to tolerowane dwa lata i teraz w okolicy wisi mnóstwo takich błędnych ograniczeń prędkości. Po zbanowaniu tego użytkownika skasowałem ograniczenia po niku ale niestety jak ktoś ruszył linie już nie umiem w overpasie wyszukać takich starszych jego edycji. Tak że teraz zawczasu próbuje kasować. Upominam, zgłaszam ale nie bardzo daje to rezultaty bo jak widać cały czas albo ten sam użytkownik to robi, albo ma naśladowców.  
A samemu sprawdzać każdą drogę jest trudno.
Yunkers (2023-04-24 12:56:20+00:00): Trudno ale się da. Ja w swojej miejscowości - oczywiście znacznie mniejszej niż Będzin - wprowadziłem wszystkie maxspeed. 
Jeżeli faktycznie walczysz z kimś kto wprowadza masowe to można podejrzewać, że wyszukuje po prostu drogi w których nie ma maxspeed i tam coś wpisuje. Więc wpisane poprawnej danej tym bardziej będzie owocne, zwłaszcza że część że zmian dotyczyła skrzyżowań/rozjazdów gdzie jest to dość łatwe. 
Dodam, że z historii zmian tego użytkownika w zasadzie nie wynika czy to wandal, czy po prostu ktoś nowy kto wprowadza nieudolne zmiany. Dlatego Twoja reakcja wydawała mi się podejrzana.
olo81 (2023-04-24 13:00:18+00:00): Podejrzewam, że to jego główne konto:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/C2oc4
Yunkers (2023-04-24 18:14:53+00:00): Jak jeszcze coś dziwnego się wydarzy i nie bedzie jego reakcji to daj znać. Może jak dwie osoby zaraportują to coś będzie.
literan (2023-04-24 17:33:35+00:00): не надо писать названия капсом
eggie (2023-04-24 11:40:12+00:00): Hi Patil  Please comment your edits properly.
access=no removed.
NO access=no here.
It's a cyclewaycrossing

Greetz,
eggie
Rodrigo Rega (2023-05-01 18:53:06+00:00): Gran curro. Gracias!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135297126
Map-Peter (2023-04-25 19:06:44+00:00): Hallo Xaver,
 
zur Info: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135356804
 
(Ich habe gerade keine Lust das alles im Detail hier nochmal zu schreiben ...)
Map-Peter (2023-04-25 19:08:58+00:00): und auch ich bin nicht fehlerfrei: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135356935
user_5359 (2023-04-26 06:18:40+00:00): Hallo! Du scheinst das Reverter Plugin von JOSM gefunden zu haben. Damit gilt leider wieder der Kommentar https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121622186. Bitte nutze nicht die Produktionsdatenbank als privates ToDo Liste.
Frans S (2023-04-24 12:25:53+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings not accurate mapped.
Buildings not squared
Building nodes connected to other features
Clustered buildings.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135297388
eggie (2023-04-24 11:46:06+00:00): I have been here. 

Please comment your edits.
eggie
jqngarcia (2023-04-24 13:25:57+00:00): No está duplicado?
Sandrastica (2023-04-24 17:25:03+00:00): Cierto! Era de mis primeras ediciones y una la he hecho seleccionando toda la manzana. Miro a ver cómo borrarlo. ¡Disculpad!
eggie (2023-04-24 11:49:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Tlepel (2023-04-24 12:58:32+00:00): Dankjewel Eggie!
alesarrett (2023-05-04 13:46:01+00:00): Ciao Diego, la linea che hai disegnato non è assolutamente in costruzione.
Va cancellata o, se proprio vuoi lasciarla, modificata in proposed (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed).
Inoltre, da dove hai preso informazioni sulla tratta di dettaglio?
Dimitar155 (2023-04-24 20:10:21+00:00): Hello beatnickgr,

Do you know what's on the upper floors of this buildings? I doubt that this restaurant occupies all floors.

Best regard,
Dimitar
sheldonelectric (2023-04-25 05:40:30+00:00): The restaurant is the whole building, there is no upper floors.
Dimitar155 (2023-04-25 06:01:40+00:00): I see at least 3 floors on Esri Clarity, the cadastre also confirms this data. Not to mention the house number which translates to "Residential building 37".
sheldonelectric (2023-04-25 06:23:36+00:00): I'm pretty sure I saw nothing above, which can be crosschecked with online pictures.
Probably the residential building is the one just north, which is completely missing from osm.
sheldonelectric (2023-04-25 06:39:12+00:00): Or maybe there's 2 buildings missing, 1 north of this (built in 2022) and 1 south of this (na moos restaurant). 
It was raining when I went, I didn't walk around, but I think Na Moos was 2nd building left (from south parking entrance).
Dimitar155 (2023-04-25 13:04:25+00:00): The building that is north of this one is a private school. Then you have this one, which was "missing" because you removed the building tag. I've added the southern building, where this restaurant is most likely located and a note to survey it.
sheldonelectric (2023-04-25 13:19:24+00:00): The restaurant is ok now. From online images, I can see a new building north of this one, and east of the school.
Dimitar155 (2023-04-25 14:00:18+00:00): The photos on their website are from their second restaurant in the city center (https://www.google.com/maps/@42.6899585,23.327863,3a,15y,44.96h,89.96t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s7UdBMa01p5l28W26xwwXsA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656).
Captain_America_802 (2023-04-24 11:59:05+00:00): Changeset comments did not save so I'm adding them here. "New road added to connect floating roads to the main road."
Langlaeufer (2023-04-24 14:19:57+00:00): Hallo Juan,
living Street meint verkehrsberuhigte Zone (blaues Verkehrsschild)
Tempo 30 Zone ist keine verkehrsberuhigte Zone sondern residential (An dem OSM-Way steht das es eine Tempo 30 Zone wäre)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135298918
Langlaeufer (2023-04-24 14:22:32+00:00): Hat sich aufgeklärt,

habe in Mapillary gesehen das es wirklich verkehrsberuhigt ist und daher die Tempo 30 Zone entfernt.

Frohes Mappen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135298918
JuanCarlos80 (2023-04-24 14:52:04+00:00): Ah, da hast du einen Tag gefunden, den ich übersehen habe zu entfernen. Sehr gut :)
Warin61 (2023-04-25 00:04:53+00:00): Hi.
The changest comment does not look like it relates to the actual changes? 

I have split the building relation in to 2 relations as they look like 2 separate buildings that touch. A single multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments and that was a fault with the single relation.
mp747474 (2023-06-20 09:27:25+00:00): bist du dir sicher, dass die Bäckerei in Hauswurz geschlossen hat? Die Webseite ist noch aktiv und es sollen laut Google-Bewertungen vor kurzem noch Kunden in der Bäckerei eingekauft haben.
Dimitar155 (2023-04-24 21:04:49+00:00): Hello beatnickgr,

Please avoid merging POIs with buildings. It makes it a lot harder to clean up after they close down or when they move to another location.

Best regards,
Dimitar
sheldonelectric (2023-04-25 05:35:49+00:00): I only merge it when the POI is the entire building. If they close down I change it to disused:amenity.
Dimitar155 (2023-04-25 06:00:15+00:00): POI almost never occupy a whole building unless it is a single story and specifically built for that POI (some restaurants, malls, most bigger supermarkets etc.). This one is a two story house. I doubt that they occupy both floors given the fact that it has been tagged as house.

The change of amenity to disused:amenity is easy but you also have to clear all other POI tags which takes a lot more time when you have it merged with a building since you have to make sure that you are not deleting the building related tags.
sheldonelectric (2023-04-25 06:06:30+00:00): There's a staircase from inside to reach the higher floor.

Yes I clear the other tags when it's disused. This way, when the same building is rented to another business, you can still look for history and see the previous business(es) which were in this building.
Dimitar155 (2023-04-25 12:52:24+00:00): What do they have on the second floor? A kitchen, seating area for customers or somebody's home?
sheldonelectric (2023-04-25 13:21:41+00:00): I sit outside and didn't go upstairs.
It's obviously not somebody's home, since the only access if from inside the restaurant (which is closing at night). 
Most probably it's the kitchen/storage, since i didn't see it on the ground floor.
bkil (2023-04-24 15:32:25+00:00): Thank you for your contribution. I have fixed up your edit: https://osm.org/changeset/135307318#map=18/47.34931/19.09589 Note that you must not enter the house number into `name`, you should only encircle the footprint of the given building and not the whole estate and it is also beneficial to make polygons orthogonal via built in shortcut keys.
herisusa (2023-05-03 20:34:03+00:00): Hi SOrti,

deine Gebäude im neuen Gewerbegebiet gibt es größtenteils noch nicht. Auf NRW Orthophoto sind diese Gebäude nicht sichtbar!
Ich habe da jetzt Platzhalter mit den Hausnummern hinterlassen.
Gruß Herisusa
SOrti (2023-05-04 07:27:52+00:00): Hi,
Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe Karten von der Gemeinde bekommen, wo die Hausnummern schon versorgt waren. Ich arbeite bei der Feuerwehr und für uns sind die Hausnummern sehr wichtig (Bauunfälle). Da ich noch relativ neu bin, wusste ich nicht, das es diese Platzhalter gibt.
Viele Grüße
SOrti
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-27 18:14:26+00:00): Hello!

You used
tee=red;v
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1163885873/history

Have you maybe meant
tee=red
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
ivanbranco (2023-04-25 09:16:38+00:00): Hi Kelso-Mg,

thank you for adding missing artworks :)

I noticed something tho. wikidata=* and wikipedia=* should be used for wikidata/wikipedia entries describing the element. So you can't use them to link the artist, because the element is about the artist's artwork, not the artist. In these cases rather use artist:wikidata and artist:wikipedia.

Same for commons, they should link to the artwork category, not the artist category. Also please notice there's a syntax to be followed for such tag, for example it should be wikimedia_commons=Category:Frau mit Armen (Georg Ettl) and not wikimedia_commons=https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Frau_mit_Armen_(Georg_Ettl)

I should have fixed them, thanks again for your edits and good mapping :)
user_3716049 (2023-04-25 18:56:25+00:00): Ok thank you for your help, I will fix it in the next days.
user_5359 (2023-04-26 06:34:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice you add mostly foreign keys! If you need help to correct this, you are welcome.