piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Manos Roudas (2026-02-28 09:51:38+00:00): Haha it was not our intention to remove our neighbour cafe! And of course in the description we copy our main description which is not spam neither promo. We do private boat tours on luxury powerboats and we describe what we offer. We happen to be in the luxury yacht sector.
Manos Roudas (2026-02-28 09:52:17+00:00): Do you think you can put us on the map??
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-28 11:08:50+00:00): You did it already @Manos Roudas

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179164832
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-28 11:10:20+00:00): PS: The bot's concern only relates to the description text, which was/is still spammy.
Manos Roudas (2026-02-28 11:31:40+00:00): Thanks for taking the time, but what exactly is the spam? We are a company that does private boat tours with skipper and crew to the islands. And the truth is that we do that on luxury crafts, which I removed so none feels offended. What else should I remove, what is spammy?
NeisBot (2026-02-28 05:36:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13607061952 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Law office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-08 17:33:05+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179543885
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
PlaneMad (2026-03-02 18:36:41+00:00): Welcome to Goa, nice to see your edits!
bkjha (2026-03-24 08:08:29+00:00): Thanks. You've mapped Goa really really well. Land use tracing here is just amazing. Map looks so colourful with water, mangroves, beach, forest(whatever left), etc. Would love to join you on a field mapping.
FajrAl (2026-02-28 09:15:54+00:00): Silakan ikut berdiskusi di
changeset/178496473. Walaupun sudah Anda ubah, tetap akan diubah oleh seseorang.
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 04:29:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180138009
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179158391
Yog Sot (2026-03-03 23:43:10+00:00): miałem napisać, że git robota, ale dobrze, żem się wstrzymał, bo spaprałeś relacje. 🔔 szame, szame 🔔
theDM (2026-03-04 00:43:30+00:00): które dokładnie?
Yog Sot (2026-03-04 23:51:42+00:00): wszystkie takie https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9293867/history/3
NeisBot (2026-02-28 06:51:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13607116233 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Boutique Hotel"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-08 17:33:07+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179543887
(No visible changes after review)
rarad74 (2026-02-28 07:00:53+00:00): You are a liar, and for that you will be blocked again if you do the same mistakes. ID editor is the most easy to use openstreetmap editor.
rarad74 (2026-02-28 07:20:52+00:00): You even didn't read what i tell you. There isn't a tag named parking. For parking acces street you must use parking_aisle.
AndyB_66 (2026-02-28 10:16:47+00:00): Bitte beachten Sie die Regeln für die Benennung von Änderungssätzen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
KlausG (2026-02-28 12:31:32+00:00): Ja, stimmt, ich habe hier versehentlich noch das gleiche Luftbild angegeben, dass ich mit den Änderungen weiter südlich genutzt hatte..., wenn sich der Kommentar darauf bezieht...
NeisBot (2026-02-28 07:27:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13607169277 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Phone booth"
---
Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего текста могла бы быть: "Телефонная будка"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-08 17:33:07+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179161744
FajrAl (2026-02-28 08:55:08+00:00): Halo, selamat datang di OpenStreetMap. Disarankan untuk tidak menambahkan data pribadi di OSM, seperti contoh nama pemilik rumah.
27OuM1687O9ugtu5crv4 (2026-02-28 08:58:46+00:00): Oke. Kandy bukan nama pemilik.
mikita_paloika (2026-03-04 10:05:51+00:00): Hi _unru1y_! Your changes will be rolled back because they have not been confirmed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179160819
onterof (2026-03-22 10:43:30+00:00): Hallo,
in diesem changeset (und in weiteren) wurden eine Menge building=commercial eingetragen, die nach Luftbild wohl eher Garagen sind.
Wurden die Daten einfach übernommen, oder mit dem Luftbild abgeglichen bzw. auf Plausibilität geprüft?
Eine Diskussion zu der Problematik gibt es aktuell hier 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/import-von-gebaude-geometrien-etc-durch-nutzer/142460/18
Grüße
wies1 (2026-03-23 06:13:30+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe inzwischen in der Diskussion Erläuterungen gemacht. Ich nehme zwar auch zzbuildings, weiss aber, dass dies bei commercial problematisch ist, so dass ich es immer mache, dass ich das, was zzbuildings als commercial ausgibt in yes umwandle. Hier an dieser Stelle muss ich sagen, habe ich dies wohl vergessen gehabt. Ergänzend möchte ich auch hier sagen, dass ich auch noch die Luftbilder anschaue und ggf. Korrekturen der Gebäudeumrisse mache.  Jedenfalls danke für den Hinweis. Die commercial Gebäude hätten hier nicht mehr sein sollen, habe dies jetzt geändert.

Gruss
wies1
NeisBot (2026-02-28 08:12:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13607221819 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Academy building"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Akademiegebäude"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-08 17:33:10+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179543889
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
❤️‍🔥 (2026-03-02 11:32:46+00:00): thanks for your edits! if the gate is private, then this implies that the road on the east side of the gate is also private, right?
AmineAusAlbuquerque (2026-03-02 12:15:28+00:00): Hi, thanks! I’m not sure which road segment you mean by “the road on the east side of the gate.” Could you please specify the exact section (e.g., share the OSM link / way ID or describe it)?

Just to explain what I know when I was there during my vacation in december 2025: from Cove Road there’s a right-hand turn with an electronic gate. That access then leads to Tuaraki Road and the holiday accommodations. Is that the area you’re referring to?
AmineAusAlbuquerque (2026-03-02 12:17:18+00:00): aah, got it. yeah the east
 side of the road is also private! :)
NeisBot (2026-02-28 08:15:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13607221819 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Academy building"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Akademiegebäude"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-08 17:33:11+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179543889
Adikso (2026-03-23 06:04:13+00:00): Powinieneś bardziej uważać. Natrafiłem ostatnio na już kilka twoich zmian z tekstem "amenity=place_of_worship" w addr:street
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 07:21:07+00:00): Reverted adding POIs and other nodes with malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184212306

https://osm.org/changeset/184212306
NeisBot (2026-02-28 09:09:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13607260297 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "plastic surgery center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-08 17:33:12+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179371086
Jonáš Hubáček (2026-03-07 13:04:49+00:00): Hey. Have you been there?
ylivny (2026-03-07 15:12:48+00:00): Yes. 
Location is based on GPS recording I made 2 weeks ago
mueschel (2026-03-08 10:50:48+00:00): Hallo,
bei den Referenznummern von Denkmäler ist der Prefix "heritage:" nicht üblich.
Es sollte also "ref:lfd" sein und nicht "heritage:ref:lfd".
eggie (2026-02-28 13:38:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-02-28 10:27:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/313088434 v14

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Private BoatDock"

#MapWithoutSpam
Manos Roudas (2026-02-28 10:55:10+00:00): Thanks for your suggestion! I understand that you recommend changing the name of our company from "1852 Private Boat Tours" to a phony "1852 Private BoatDocks", but I am afarid this is illegal in Greece. A company must be referred to with its legal or commercial name.
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-28 11:04:07+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for your reply.

To clarify, the issue is *not* the company name. 

The concern only relates to the description text, which should be factual, concise, and non-promotional. OpenStreetMap is a neutral map database and does not allow marketing-style wording.

Please revise the description accordingly. 

Thank you!
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-28 11:13:29+00:00): PS: Could you please clarify where the company is physically based? The current node is located directly on a dock in the harbor. Is there an actual office or shop at this location?
Manos Roudas (2026-02-28 11:28:40+00:00): Hello! It is a private boat tour company, there is the base where the boats are, where people have to come to embark
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-28 11:35:19+00:00): Thank you for the clarification.

Please ensure the location is clearly verifiable on the ground (e.g., permanent signage) and tag it accordingly as an embarkation/meeting point if there is no office or shop present. If applicable, you may also add available payment methods.

Thanks.
Manos Roudas (2026-02-28 11:38:26+00:00): Thanks a lot for your help! Appreciated
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-28 11:41:23+00:00): 👍
literan (2026-03-01 11:58:17+00:00): поле name - для имен собственных, а не описаний типа "грейдер"
Enock4seth (2026-02-28 13:13:47+00:00): Hi, is TL an abbreviation?
Oier_ (2026-03-23 01:08:33+00:00): Veo que has "Revertido" ediciones realizadas por Hugoren Martinako estableciendo name=name:es .Estas ediciones no estan de acuerdo a la wiki acordada y consensuada en 2025 para esta zona de Navarra. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas#Idiomas
jayaddison (2026-02-28 15:46:17+00:00): Thanks for updating this water tap - it doesn't seem to be functioning, though.  Pressing the button didn't dispense any water when I checked earlier today.
jayaddison (2026-03-04 08:44:45+00:00): Just so you know: I've reverted the water tap back to disused:amenity=drinking_water in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179327997

NB: I contacted Scottish Water to ask whether they could check about this tap last year (~Summer Y2025), and today I've learned that it was raised in a Q&A with Edinburgh Council towards the end of Y2024 too.  Ref: https://democracy.edinburgh.gov.uk/documents/b25418/Questions%20and%20Answers%2007th-Nov-2024%2010.00%20City%20of%20Edinburgh%20Council.pdf?T=9

Thanks for noticing it and editing the existing node - I hope it becomes functional in future.
darkonus (2026-03-07 14:57:01+00:00): Вітаю! Будь ласка, не позначайте обʼєктів яких не існує.
StreetSurveyor (2026-07-10 01:10:06+00:00): Thanks for the update. As a reminder, road names in OSM should use the full official name, so “Extension” rather than “Ext.” Happy mapping!
Rob7280 (2026-07-11 09:55:22+00:00): Thanks for letting me know. I did not know that was the norm. Have a great weekend!
StreetSurveyor (2026-07-11 11:00:33+00:00): You’re welcome! I’ve made the same mistake before myself. There are a lot of little OSM conventions that aren’t always obvious. Thanks for being receptive, and have a great weekend too!
geomaniX (2026-02-28 11:42:26+00:00): Da hat GoMap die Änderungen einfach hochgelu, bevor ich den Änderungssatzkommentar fertig hatte.
Es sollte eigentlich heißen: "Geschäft wg. Schließung am 31.03.2026 mit Schließungsnote versehen; Tagging der Ladestationen auf dem Parkplatz aktualisiert; Gebäudeoutlines mit Hilfe von Alkis NRW angepasst."
Tewuzij (2026-02-28 11:42:56+00:00): Actually, I made 222 changes. Sorry!
eggie (2026-02-28 20:21:29+00:00): review_requested 	yes
Dag OSM-user-472946,

De info heb ik samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode.
MVG,
eggie
Rainero (2026-03-12 15:53:20+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179764038
(unzulässige Quelle)
tux67 (2026-03-01 12:49:46+00:00): Hi, du hast hier den Defi gelöscht, ohne eine Quelle deiner Information anzugeben. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Was war der Grund?

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179167554
kingkingHK (2026-03-01 12:09:14+00:00): Are you sure about the two left-turn-only relations? I can't see anything in the pics I took during my surveys. Can't see any restrictions in recent bus videos either.
vectorial8192 (2026-03-03 03:55:55+00:00): To clarify, the signposts are planted not on the opposite side, but on the near side. Entirely possible you just missed them.
kingkingHK (2026-03-03 06:52:00+00:00): Do you happen to have any photos of the signs? Because I really can't spot them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGv6o1GnR9g&t=145s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHiwyppz7GQ&t=350s
vectorial8192 (2026-03-03 07:43:34+00:00): Too old.
vectorial8192 (2026-03-03 07:45:57+00:00): To clarify, the videos are in December, but I went there in February.
kingkingHK (2026-03-03 08:44:55+00:00): Ok, from newer bus videos I can see the signs. Really didn't expect the signs to be erected a few months after the hospital opens.

Apologies for the wrong accusation.
Kovoschiz (2026-03-01 09:42:29+00:00): Please use `*:yue-Latn=` for romanization without commonly recognized and used status, not `*:en=`
Sammyhawkrad (2026-02-28 14:06:13+00:00): Hi Godfred_uew, it seems you enjoy using UPPER CASE a lot, but note that this is against OSM convention. You can look everywhere else on the map and notice that you are the only one doing that.

The name=* tag should always be in the title case except for acronyms.
Kovoschiz (2026-02-28 13:34:17+00:00): `=embankment` doesn't mean any non-sharp slopes, but land raised to above. This is a cut slope. along the original mountains. There are some `man_made=cutting`
Kovoschiz (2026-02-28 13:35:50+00:00): Rendering can abuse and add `=earth_bank` + `anthropogenic=yes`
OldManCelli (2026-03-02 13:32:29+00:00): I think you meant 
name:zh-pinyin, not name:zh_pinyin
name:zh-zhuyin, not name:zh_zhuyin
kingkingHK (2026-02-28 12:29:36+00:00): I doubt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1167317707 is on an embankment.
vectorial8192 (2026-02-28 13:30:30+00:00): Good catch. Improved / fixed with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179170787
NeisBot (2026-02-28 12:24:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13607485255 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dentistry office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-08 17:33:15+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179543890
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
bxl-forever (2026-02-28 13:11:30+00:00): Hello,

As far as I can see, Брюссель is the Ukrainian name for Brussels.  But the object you edited here is not the city of Brussels but the "Brussels-Capital Region".  This is the name of an administrative part of our country, and the name is longer.  All the translations for this OSM object use the full name.  Can you please review your edit and provide a translation that says "Brussels-Capital Region" instead of just "Brussels".
Thanks.
Yan Bakhmat (2026-03-01 11:59:27+00:00): Ok, I will make the corrections, thanks for the comments.
tg4567 (2026-03-06 11:26:39+00:00): Özgür Yazılım Derneği için farklı bir adres görünüyor: https://www.oyd.org.tr/iletisim/
eggie (2026-02-28 13:48:13+00:00): Dag Romee.. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-28 13:43:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Op het terrein staat Roompot Gulpen. Moet dat niet aangepast worden?
Dat klopt dan niet met Landal Gulpen.
Het adres heb ik verwijderd. 
Format klopt niet voor adres. 
Er is een adresnode hier. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-28 13:46:45+00:00): De naam op het terrein heb ik aangepast en samengevoegd met de overige info.
MVG
eggie
JannisOSM (2026-02-28 19:14:26+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Bedankt dat je er naar keek, ik neem zodirect de welkomst-instructies door.

Wat ik wou aanpassen is de naam van het park; het is overgenomen door Landal en heet nu "Landal Gulpen" i.p.v. "Roompot Gulpen". Overigens zie ik nu op de kaart "Lompot Gulpen" staan, dus dat klopt niet.

Groeten, Jannis
JannisOSM (2026-02-28 19:15:08+00:00): Update: ik zie "Lompot Gulpen" staan bij de receptie, op een andere plek staat de naam nu wel goed.
eggie (2026-02-28 19:19:38+00:00): Nee.. dat is de cache van je scherm.
Er staat nu helemaal geen naam meer op het gebouw.
Landal Gulpen staat al op het terrein. Dat is voldoende.
Een paar keer ctrl-f5 toetsen.
Groet,
eggie
rempshaener (2026-02-28 19:21:31+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe nur eine Anmerkung zur Anzahl der Kupplungen:
Das Feld "couplings" bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten normalerweise leer, da es sich um die „Angabe der vorhandenen Anzahl an Schlauchanschlüssen“ handelt, siehe osm.wiki/DE:Key:couplings?uselang=de. Unterflurhydranten haben in der Regel nur mit Standrohr eine Schlauchkupplung. 
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
TCF85 (2026-03-01 11:42:08+00:00): Moin,

Danke für das sachlich richtige Feedback! 
Ich wollte die Hydranten in meiner Gemeinde hier mal eintragen, allerdings habe ich darin noch keine Erfahrung.
Grass-snake (2026-03-01 05:53:24+00:00): Привет, изменил название улицы https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1158701000
с "Зазёрная улица" на "Зелёный переулок". Не знаю откуда взялось название, но в ПКК нашёл 3 адреса с другим названием (если ошибся, исправь обратно, пожалуйста).
Stalker61 (2026-03-01 07:47:39+00:00): Привет. Да ничего страшного. Посмотрю конечно. Мне не в тягость. Сегодня закончу восстанавливать Р-243 и гляну. Я вообще в осадок выпал, что натворили с федеральными а/д редакторы рукожопые. Чего стОят М-7 и М-12. Одним словом не база данных, а обыкновенная помойка.
NeisBot (2026-02-28 14:03:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 15 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1108115198 v4 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1424465745 v3 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179171916
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-28 15:33:41+00:00): In this case, it seems the reported issues are false positives. The geometries were not changed in a way that would introduce crossings, and the tagging adjustments did not create any new conflicts.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks again for your map edits.

Regards,
Pascal
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-28 14:04:33+00:00): miało być: podjazd
BCNorwich (2026-03-03 07:00:35+00:00): Hi, New building has been removed as it's over several existing buildings. Tags were placed on what I think is the correct building. Website tag removed, it doesn't link.

Regards Bernard.
AbinayaSivakumar (2026-03-03 07:03:45+00:00): Hi Bernard,
Thank you for correcting the building placement and for removing the invalid website tag. I understand now that I should carefully check existing buildings before adding new ones and ensure website links are valid.
I appreciate your guidance.
Regards,
Abinaya