piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
manjita pandey (2026-07-28 05:58:59+00:00): Hello, 
Thank you for clarifying. I am more clear now and will take care while mapping such features from next time.
Andrea Musuruane (2025-09-04 12:47:48+00:00): Ciao. Ho notato che sbagli spessissimo a inserire il valore del tag lanes: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes

Il valore del tag lanes rappresenta il numero di corsie totali della strada. 

Se le corsie non sono dipinte si usa il tag lane_markings=no.

Tu invece usi lanes=1 che e' sbagliato perché significa che c'e' solo una corsia in entrambi i sensi di marcia (e questo implicherebbe o un senso unico o un senso unico alternato).

Per favore, puoi correggere? Questi sono tutti quelli che hai inserito:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2b9P

Grazie,

Andrea
Marek-M (2025-09-04 10:55:44+00:00): Cześć, mogłeś poprawić istniejącą drogę zamiast jej usuwania i dodawania na nowo. Historia byłaby zachowana.
dp7 (2025-09-04 13:35:06+00:00): Ciao
Per i campanili userei semplicemente 
tower:type=bell_tower

il doppio tag "bell_tower;clock tower" non credo sia corretto e "clock tower" non mi sembra sia documentato.
Una tantum (2025-09-04 13:57:50+00:00): Ciao, grazie del commento,
effettivamente avrei dovuto mettere man_made=clock tower, errore mio; 
ora chiedo come si fa nei casi in cui sia clock tower che bell tower, non ne ho idea!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dclock_tower#How_to_map
rskedgell (2025-09-04 13:26:00+00:00): Are you sure that deleting desire line paths which are clearly visible in aerial imagery is the best strategy, rather than using a lifecycle prefix like disused:* or razed:* and a note=* (at least until the imagery catches up) is the best strategy here? Simply deleting them risks them being re-added by other mappers as highway=path ways.
tux67 (2025-09-04 10:56:57+00:00): Hallo NEWHerfs,

psy=yes ist ein default Value .. wieso sollte es ausgerechnet an dieser Stelle notwendig sein den explizit hinzuzufühen?

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171444607
NEWDH (2025-09-08 06:11:24+00:00): Hallo Herr Tux67,

ich Stelle mich kurz vor. Ich bin Sachbearbeiterin bei der NEW MöBus im Verkehrsbetrieb. Ich arbeite mit DIVA, dem VRR Auskunftssystem, als Kartengrundlage wird hier OpenStreetMap genutzt.  
vielleicht können sie mich unterstützen.
Das markierte Stück: Hier dürfen PKWs Busse dieses Teilstück der Straße in beiden Richtungen befahren. PKWS bis zur Einfahrt des Parkhauses der Stadtsparkasse und Busse weiter bis zum MG Hbf.
Können sie das eventuell für mich Pflegen. Ich kenne mich mit den Befehlen nicht so korrekt aus. Jedoch weiß ich das die Busse und PKWs dort in beide Richtungen fahren dürfen.
Bei Rückfragen wäre ich dankbar, wenn sie sich bei mir melden würden. 
Viele Dank für Ihre Unterstützung.
tux67 (2025-09-08 06:51:39+00:00): Hallo Frau Herfs und danke für die Rückmeldung. Wenn ich kann, helfe ich gerne - zunächst muss ich aber mal die Lage verstehen. 
Wenn ich das richtig sehe, ist das Problem nicht, dass der Bus auf genau diesem Stück nicht fahren darf, sondern, das es an dieser Stelle eine Abbiegevorschrift gibt (alles muß links in die Bismarkstraße), die zur Zeit auch Busse nicht ausnimmt. 
Was Sie meinen (korrigieren Sie mich bitte, wenn ich falsch liege) ist, das der Bus auf der Straßenbegleitenden Busspur dieses Stücks der Rathenaustraße auch (in die Goebenstraße)  geradeaus fahren  darf?
PKWs, die von der Rathenaustraße zu Sparkassenparkhaus wollen, müssen nach meinem Verständnis ohnehin diesen Weg wählen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37799868

MfG
tux67
tux67 (2025-09-08 06:56:33+00:00): Diese Abbiebeschränkung meinte ich:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15952109
NEWDH (2025-09-08 07:15:21+00:00): Ich erkenne es nicht genau, welche Stück bearbeitet werden muss. Es muss nachher so gepflegt sein, wie sie es auch schon richtig beschrieben haben. Unsere Busse fahren über die Busspur (auf der Rathenaustraße) in die Goebenstraße und die PKWs fahren auf der Rathenaustraße und dürfen nur links in die Bismarckstraße abbiegen und wenn die PKWs zum Sparkassen-Parkhaus wollen, dann fahren sie auf dem unteren Parallelstück geradeaus in die Goebenstraße.
Nochmals lieben Dank für Ihre Hilfe. Können sie mir ein kurzes Ok geben, wenn sie es gepflegt bzw. geändert haben, dann kann ich unsere Linie in DIVA richtig georeferenzieren. MFG D. Herfs
tux67 (2025-09-08 07:24:06+00:00): Danke für die Bestätigung .. ich schau mir das mal an und melde mich dann ..
tux67 (2025-09-08 07:38:59+00:00): So - der vorhandenen Abbiegebeschränkung https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15952109 habe ich jetzt ein "except=bus" hinzugefügt, das Busse von dieser Restriktion ausnimmt.
NEWDH (2025-09-08 07:43:12+00:00): Perfekt, danke!
Dimitar155 (2025-09-06 06:17:13+00:00): I've previously marked the area around https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13119029504 as car park. I assume that it isn't car park?
rhhs (2025-09-06 06:32:32+00:00): It is, but it's also used to park the rental cars I assume. I didn't walk all the way down to the car park, just noticed signs at the access road
Dimitar155 (2025-09-06 06:36:14+00:00): Leaving it like that for now. If someone someday complains that it isn't right, it can be changed.
rhhs (2025-09-06 06:50:55+00:00): It's better now than it was. Il meglio è l'inimico del bene
Dimitar155 (2025-09-06 07:09:13+00:00): Sì, sì, è vero.
DeFra85 (2025-10-17 15:35:57+00:00): Ahoi, steht an dem Feldweg wirklich ein offizielles Straßennamenschild "Feldweg"? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:traffic_sign%3DDE:437)

Und die access-Details sind etwas überbordend und sind teilweise redundant oder schließen sich gar gegenseitig aus. highway=track haben in Deutschland automatisch ein access=yes, also muss das nicht extra nochmal drangehängt werden, lediglich die Verbote.
Welche Verbot-Schilder sind denn vor Ort vorhanden? Hier mal ein Tool zur Bestimmung: https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/
Rumburak57 (2025-10-17 15:48:42+00:00): Hi Dennis, da ist kein Schild. Es ist eben nur ein "Feldweg" und hat keinerlei Verbotsschilder.
DeFra85 (2025-10-17 15:52:03+00:00): Dann müssten name= und alle access-Beschränkungen entfernt werden, weil sie vor Ort nicht ausgewiesen sind.
osmviborg (2025-09-04 10:45:45+00:00): Please don't modify/move/add address nodes. Addresses in Denmark are imported from an official database and maintained automatically. Thank You.
osmviborg (2025-09-04 10:46:30+00:00): Please don't tag buildings with addresses. In DK addresses are kept on nodes only.
fortera_au (2025-09-07 00:30:58+00:00): Hi, do we ahve permission to use the marinesafety.sa.gov.au news feed as a source? The website says it's available under CC3, which I don't believe is directly compatible with ODbL
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171444849
Elwell (2025-09-09 00:17:34+00:00): If we can't use the positions directly, i should have enough photos of the river to roughly determine coordinates and will upload to a flickr album when home next week. Have already visually verified the light sequence of the piles upriver from the barage, and will try and get some more of the tidal section before I leave Goolwa tomorrow
Living_man Singapura (2025-09-04 11:54:29+00:00): ٱلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ,
as-salāmu ʿalaykum,

i step forth to indicate in writing, that this `revert edit` is done with me protesting against it, reason: no reference to any public discussion with local community granting approval of ⚠mass revert edit ⚠

Let it be investigated by other local mappers of the Republik, to changesets with comment, ''Changed road classification to driveway so that the road lines appear thinner. Else it’s too visually overwhelming.'' AND are **without deletion** of any roads 
171388699, 171388597, [...][...], 171249984, 171250024

sample linked: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171161088


to corporate Grab Holdings, GrabSG_AndyAng, GrabSG_zack
to local good mappers Hong Yao, 
Hong Yao	27%
buy_osmand	214	9%
kenken234	195	8%
YJJcoolcool	71	3%
Mith252	
JaLooooNz	
leheng	

you are all invited to answer this question," is there any loss or harm to osm data with the addition of tag `service=driveway`❓❗

Let this truth stand in the Living Record

Invitation for the `Engineering team` of osmf is highly appreciated following these events.

[April 10th, Mankind is free][1],
buy_osmand (Living_man Singapura)

[1]:  https://ministryofhealth.substack.com/p/39-the-great-discharge-it-is-finished?open=false#%C2%A7index-of-primary-notices
Living_man Singapura (2025-09-04 11:57:44+00:00): Please ignore the signature, i drafted the message in my email inbox 🙏
Keep the discussion relevant, good mappers 😊
GrabSG_AndyAng (2025-09-05 10:10:57+00:00): Please check again, you are not reviewing the changesets correctly.

As far as I have checked, all the changesets involved in this revert has deletions. That is, 170224415, 170226359, 171010062.  

Your changeset comments contained a lot of unnecessary information related to the changeset, please refrain from providing the unrelated information.
Living_man Singapura (2025-09-06 02:38:55+00:00): This is for the public record, i was not informed of reverts and was alarmed that there were at first writing.

I deeemed it necessary to state clearly to what i approve if proceeded. for that is referenced here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170869886#c1483509

In a recent private letter, we have found common grounds to which i publicly disclose, quote "[...] , and some changeset can be valid like changing of some tags like `highway=driveway`." 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/messages/1289585#:~:text=%2C%20and%20some%20changeset%20can%20be%20valid%20like%20changing%20of%20some%20tags%20like%20highway%3Ddriveway.

I am very grateful to have read that and am at peace to focus my energies on restoration and verification now... 

 AlhamdullilahirRabil'aalaameen❗❕
Đuro Jiří (2025-09-04 10:59:10+00:00): + drinking water = yes sulla fontana, visto la foto e che prima era mappata come drinking water.:)
Una tantum (2025-09-04 11:59:19+00:00): ok grazie della nota
mtmail (2025-10-18 15:00:45+00:00): Do you remember what the source for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1427069024 was? The postcode doesn't match the area. Other maps and their Facebook page shows the shop one block to the each (South East Street).
Maybe some of the data got mixed up with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4122005890 in the same changeset?
rempshaener (2025-09-07 20:07:03+00:00): Hallo,
bitte die Nennweiten ohne Einheit (mm) eintragen.
Viele Grüße
DaanKemps (2025-09-04 10:45:00+00:00): I seem to already have submitted this in the past, my bad! But I live near this road, it's unfortunate that most navigations have it wrong.
eggie (2025-09-04 11:00:51+00:00): Dag Daan,

Je weg straat heeft gedeeltelijk geen naam. Die straat is dan niet goed vindbaar,
Er zitten ook een aantal doorsteekjes voor voetgangers tussen. 
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.69963,5.573378,19/?datastrip=20250813_SVNEO-01

MVG
eggie
DaanKemps (2025-09-04 11:08:28+00:00): Excuses dat was mij niet opgevallen, heb het aangepast
eggie (2025-09-04 11:12:40+00:00): Oke.. Ik heb nog wat woningen van construction gehaald hier. 
Mapse
eggie
Stalker61 (2025-09-06 08:03:44+00:00): Здравствуйте. Зачем делать дубль адрески на хозпостройку? В глубине участка стоит жилой дом с этим адресом. Такое впечатление, что копируете с НЯК-а.
geo_ozon (2025-09-24 23:43:56+00:00): Здравствуйте. Мы используем только разрешенные в OSM источники данных. То, что не заметили уже проставленного на соседнем здании адреса, признаем. Будем внимательнее
Patchi (2025-12-22 08:47:41+00:00): Bonjour LAZACARTO,

Est-ce vraiment sur que le poteau indicateur "Boscodon" (et pas Boscondon)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12151256907 n'existe plus du tout ? Ou est-ce que le poteau "Boscodon" se trouve maintenant ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13118975869 ?

Et est-ce que les poteaux https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7956106380 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7956106381 ont un nom ou s'agit-il juste d'une indication du chemin à suivre (ce que je pense) ?

Ca me permettra d'améliorer les relations pédestres car tout n'est pas à 100% clair.

Merci pour ta contribution,

Patchi.
wildmaps (2025-09-04 11:23:40+00:00): Ciao @toponomastica_comune_arenzano,
posso chiederti perché queste aree sono taggate come natural=heath? Per esempio w1427077455
Grazie
toponomastica_comune_arenzano (2025-09-08 14:12:01+00:00): come le avresti mappate tu cambia se vuoi ma da bing vedo dello "sporco" che tutt'al più potrebbe essere scrub ma la predominanza li è incolto cespugli
wildmaps (2025-09-08 22:21:01+00:00): Ah, ok. Non era una critica. Così da bing è difficile da vedere cos'è... Grazie per il tuo contributo. Un saluto
Marek-M (2025-09-04 11:35:29+00:00): Cześć, opisy budynków, zbiorników itp jeżeli bardzo potrzebujesz, to dodawaj w tagu `descritpion` a nie do `name`.

Nazywając obiekty takie jak np. Oczyszczalnia Ścieków należy pomijać dopiski opisujące miejscowość, czyli `w Słupsku` w tym przypadku należy usunąć. Można do tego użyć tagów adresowych `addr:*`.

Poprawisz swoją edycję?
Jaksza (2025-09-04 18:36:16+00:00): Jasne, dzięki za info :)
Nakaner-repair (2025-09-04 11:19:13+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 171418328, 171418419, 171418577.
Roydon Olive (2025-09-04 21:45:02+00:00): I think this road is one way north of the service road that connects to staff parking, and two way south of that. I can visit to confirm but maybe you have access to street level imagery that can confirm?
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2025-09-05 14:14:29+00:00): Hi Roydon Olive!
My name is Yuliya, and I'm the Quality Control Lead on the OSM team at Lyft.
Thank you very much for bringing this correction to our attention.
According to our data, there is a oneway sign in the north (49.94339, -97.10264): https://drive.google.com/file/d/12QZ2RVk9_NzdceDm5U7IhzQZfYmFGubm/view?usp=sharing, and the road generally has one-way telemetry: https://drive.google.com/file/d/11k02CSkix6uFomDELxOXbC6VjosLxQjA/view?usp=sharing. I believe you might be correct, as there is a stop sign for the opposite direction in the south (49.94127, -97.10243): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ICT0tGga7A0HixIAf1SQ1x4-SLq2c_Gk/view?usp=sharing and  the oneway sign first appears near the service road that connects to staff parking (49.94211, -97.10182): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dufCNLN1gNx1x7K0N4kUvcfsJEjoBsT5/view?usp=sharing
I apologize for this correction. We should not have removed the oneway tag here. I have reverted this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171447526 as I am not certain that the south part is a bidirectional road. 
Perhaps you could verify my correction after your visit of the area.

The screenshots will be available for a month. Please let me know if you are unable to view them within this timeframe – I could generate them once again.

Best regards,
Yuliya
Roydon Olive (2025-09-05 14:22:09+00:00): Thanks for your reply. In the last screenshot you can see the lane markings on the road change from yellow to white. Yellow usually means a line separating two directions of traffic, white means a line separating two lanes of traffic going the same direction. So I think that is enough to conclude that the south part of the road is bidirectional if you want to make that edit please go ahead. Otherwise I will visit at some point in the future and come back and correct it.
Roydon Olive (2025-09-06 03:49:45+00:00): I visited and confirmed the south portion is two way and the north portion is one way and I've made the edits to reflect that now.
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2025-09-08 10:11:40+00:00): Thank you so much! We appreciate your efforts and commitment to delivering a high-quality map!

Happy mapping:)
eggie (2025-09-04 11:32:56+00:00): Hoi... De format van je openingstijden klopt niet. Taal UK English.

Gebrui anders deze tool en plak na invullen het resultaat in je tagging.

openingsuren-tool

http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/


Groet
eggie
eggie (2025-09-04 11:33:46+00:00):  Di-Do 10:00-18:00
eggie (2025-09-04 11:39:24+00:00): Dag Joris... Wat heb je toegevoegd of aangepast?
Je commentaar is 'tilburg omgeving'...  en dat zegt niemand iets. 

De tags zijn niet uit de OSM Wiki
Wat is still in builiding
layground:theme	wooden_palcments
max_age	0
min_age	0
waterway=drain?

?????
Kortom . Er zitten nog een aantal fouten in.
Zoek iets op in de wiki.
anneer neer je de hoofdtag leisure=playgroud verwijdert zie je niets meer.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-04 11:39:36+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=171447991
eggie (2025-09-04 11:45:40+00:00): Een tokkelbaan is geen buidling=...   Dat moet weg.
Wanneer die er nog niet is gewoon de tokkelbaan weghalen.
eggie (2025-09-04 11:55:33+00:00): typo  Een tokkelbaan is geen building=...
eggie (2025-09-04 12:06:08+00:00): Tokkelbaangebouw verwijderd. Speeltuintje teruggezet.
waterway=drain verwijderd.Tip Check steeds wat je doet. Zoek het op in de wiki van OSM. 
MVG
eggie
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-08 01:46:24+00:00): Removed SEO spam and cleaned up other tags for POI in changeset 183804971

https://osm.org/changeset/183804971
sembelst134 (2026-01-18 21:54:38+00:00): Hallo, da du hier vor Ort warst, kannst du ggf. noch way/1033255291 zu permissive anpassen. Die Durchfahrt im allgemeinen wird ja geduldet und laut Heatmap ist es auch gut frequentiert.
Firefishy (2025-09-04 15:33:50+00:00): What is the name of this place?
bewilderbees (2025-09-04 15:57:27+00:00): Berea Bowling Club
eggie (2025-09-04 12:07:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-09-04 12:10:57+00:00): Gebruik alleen species voor de officiele naam. 
Je kunt verder species:en = en species:nl = bijtaggen. 

Please don't use name= only species

Groet
eggie
bxl-forever (2025-09-04 14:16:03+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM.

I am afraid to tell you that your change is misguided.

The official name in Dutch is "Bergense Steenweg" for the entire road across Anderlecht.  This name is written in two words on street signs as well as in the UrbIS database, which is the official reference for street names in the Brussels Region.

The "Bergensesteenweg" spelling is found in Sint-Pieters-Leeuw only, not in Brussels.

We will revert your change.
Ruslan Fatih (2025-09-04 14:12:04+00:00): Пожалуйста не удаляйте названия на русском или переводите их на name:ru
Dani CS (2025-09-24 10:58:19+00:00): Shouldn't this route use the dedicated cycleway at way/1163874239, instead of going through the intersection Rue Vieille de Tours x Rue Alfred Blanchandin ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171449617
jhaluska80 (2025-09-04 12:17:15+00:00): Accidentally re-used a comment summary.  I added a business, max weight and some roads.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-04-27 20:52:57+00:00): Well, we only map lanes separately if there is a physical barrier between the lanes, which there is not. That's why I used access:forward=* and access:backward=* tags. (Does that help? Do you have better ideas?)
custodiankeyy (2025-09-04 20:17:41+00:00): Lütfen yolları kısaltma olmadan ekleyelim.
VLD549 (2025-09-14 05:43:22+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. Could you provide a link of some sort, perhaps an image of the street name sign? I can't seem to find it. Thank you!
GIS_Melle (2025-09-14 14:12:26+00:00): Yes, i have a picture but I didnt see where i could upload it.
eggie (2025-09-04 14:37:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse (2026-01-15 00:24:27+00:00): Hello,
From looking at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/653647238 , I just wondered why you removed the building name here.  Was it wrong?
Best Regards
SomeoneElse (2026-01-15 00:24:33+00:00): Merhaba,
https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/653647238 adresine baktığımda, bina adını neden kaldırdığınızı merak ettim. Yanlış mıydı?

Saygılarımla
eggie (2025-09-04 14:31:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Je edits met commentaar gg heb ik weer teruggedraaid. war was je bedoeling?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-09-04 14:38:06+00:00): Volgens mij klopt het nu.
gr eggie
soshial (2025-09-21 12:40:39+00:00): Please don't map for the renderer (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer). It was perfectly correctly mapped as via ferrata.
soshial (2025-09-21 12:41:10+00:00): Please don't map for the renderer (https://osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer). It was perfectly correctly mapped as via ferrata.
JurijC (2025-09-22 10:29:17+00:00): Reverted, OSM's UI is misleading and shows a road highway for this tag.
soshial (2025-09-22 11:23:18+00:00): Thanks for the understanding! But, OSM renderer shows not a "highway" or road, but shows the same dotted red line as `highway=path` does.
JurijC (2025-09-22 11:36:53+00:00): If you select the path in the editing UI, it shows a picture of a road with the text "Used for roads and road-related facilities." if you click on the (i), which in this case is misleading.
soshial (2025-09-22 11:48:56+00:00): Hahaha, I see. Can close now
SomeoneElse (2025-09-28 11:20:15+00:00): Hello,
You've deleted the fence at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/694057190/history , but it still seems to be visible on aerial imagery.
Has it actually been removed on the ground since the last aerial imagery was taken?
Best Regards,
Andy
dsfarc (2025-09-28 12:06:15+00:00): Hi Andy,
You're right, after looking at it again I should indeed not have removed the fence. Apologies, I was looking at the ESRI imagery on which it is barely distinguishable.
SomeoneElse (2025-09-28 16:22:07+00:00): Thanks - I've undeleted it and aligned it with imagery in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172574575 .
BBJIB (2025-09-04 18:42:04+00:00): Thanks, great work!! :)
jaale (2025-09-04 21:20:34+00:00): Als ich zuletzt hier vorbei gekommen bin, gab es sicher keine 20kV-Freileitung von den 110kV-Trafos in das Gebäude. :) Bitte entsprechend als Erdkabel taggen.

Woher hast du denn die Info, dass die Erdkabel genau in dieses Gebäude führen? Auf dem Luftbild kann ich da nichts erkennen, und auf das Gelände habe ich keinen Zutritt...
Filip009 (2025-09-16 18:19:50+00:00): Ahoj, neviem, či toto je chcená zmena https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/997475763. Celkom dosť footway si zmenil na residential.
segi (2025-09-16 18:48:32+00:00): Ojj nie, to neni chcená zmena. Pôjdem to opraviť. Som viac veci trošku pokazil lebo som použil CTRL + C a CTRL + SHIFT +V ale pri copy mi zobralo celú cestu nie len jeden atriubút. Dačo som už opravil ale dačo evidentne ostalo. Dík za upozorneni.
Filip009 (2025-10-09 15:01:45+00:00): Stále je v tom Pobedime dosť ciest zle https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/997475773
segi (2025-10-09 19:26:02+00:00): Vďaka. prešiel som to dúfam že som už všetko opravil.
Ak ešte na niečo natrafíš daj vedieť.
wolfy1339 (2025-09-04 15:07:37+00:00): Hello,
Thank you for trying to improe address and building footprints data.

The city's interactive map is not an approved source, as the data is for consultation only. It isn't meant to be reused elsewhere

While the city does publish some open data regarding addresses, its data is licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 which is not compatible with osm, it needs an explicit permission with a waiver.
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/
Hugoren Martinako (2025-09-05 12:55:03+00:00): Por favor Toni, separa la referencia del nombre y llévala al campo ref

Saludos
Toni Serra (2025-09-07 18:57:52+00:00): Hola. Este tema lo comentamos en el canal español de telegram y no se llego a ninguna conclusión. En la wiki tampoco hay ninguna referencia al respecto. Yo pongo el nombre tal y como se detalla en la página de la Federación que ha validado la ruta. Saludos.