piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Maplev (2025-12-09 20:00:53+00:00): Być może faktycznie lepiej by to pasowało. Nie byłem dokładnie pewien, jakich znaczników użyć, a znaleziony na wiki "information=route_marker" wydawał się wtedy "optymalny". Ruszałem ten węzeł tylko dlatego, że wcześniej był oznaczony jako "tourism=artwork". Tego rodzaju "znaki" znajdują się przy prawie każdej formie przestrzennej i służą do oznaczenia "Szlaku Form Przestrzennych".
czebureks (2025-12-14 16:33:28+00:00): Okej, dzięki za wyjaśnienie. Zmieniłem
AndresDuhour (2025-10-25 13:09:51+00:00): Buen día! Corresponde mantener las palabras sin abreviar en un nombre. Voy a ir corrigiendo. Saludos! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:name
Jrachi (2025-05-09 07:37:59+00:00): Ciao, e benvenuto nella mappa più bella del mondo.
Grazie per i tuoi contributi.
Potresti spiegare l'aggiunta di website=0
survey:date=0

Ivo
ptantard (2025-05-16 06:52:33+00:00): Sono tag utilizzate per avere i dati più precisi possibili per inserimento in INFOMONT, portale del catasto nazionale sei sentieri escursionistici del CAI.
Survey, indica la data in cui è stato effettuato il rilevamento, website se esiste una pagina con la descrizione del sentiero nel sito del CAI della Zona.
Ho iniziato da poco l'attività e pian piano sto cercando di migliorare le informazioni dei sentieri della mia Zona
Jrachi (2025-05-16 07:32:21+00:00): Certo, i dati sono utili e conosco bene il catasto nazionale dei sentieri.
Ti ho chiesto se veramente pensi abbia senso inserire un dato senza valore.
survey_date = 0 cosa significa?
Una data non può essere zero!
Se vuoi contribuire ad Openstreetmap, ti prego, usa un po di criterio anche se hai appena iniziato.
Ti invito a entrare nel gruppo telegram che abbiamo creato per aiutare i mappatori di sentieri inesperti .
https://t.me/+EmHgkjBXqw9mZWU0

Ti aspetto!

Ivo
b-jazz (2025-05-09 13:57:51+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1384653474

Hello Numac,
The lines that define fairways, greens, bunkers, water hazards, and tees should never intersect or partially overlap each other and we noticed that they are overlapping in one or more of the feature pairs in this changeset.* If there is no obvious fringe around the green, the fairway should butt up against the green and every node between them should be *shared*. If there is a fringe around the green that is similar to the fairway, the fairway should extend around the green and the two objects should be merged together into a multipolygon (See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon for how to create them with your map editor).  Please read the wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions, please reply here and I'll gladly help clarify things. 
Thanks!

* Specifically you have two fairways that intersect each other. If you are adding a fringe to an existing fairway, you need to modify that geometry instead of overlapping them. Your editor might be able to merge the two fairways into a single one, but I'm not sure how to do that in iD.
rempshaener (2025-05-08 16:39:33+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Das sieht gut aus, ich habe keine Anmerkungen.

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag.
Viele Grüße
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-17 04:32:46+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18225
sanchi (2025-05-09 09:14:56+00:00): Hola. 
No se que quieres indicar exactamente pero es imposible que esta vía sea una tertiary. Por favor comprobar la wiki antes de editar.
Recupero estado anterior.
Un saludo
sanchi (2025-05-09 09:20:15+00:00): Hola
Por favor comprobar loq ue existe en el mapa antes de añadir datos. El cementerio ya existía y se ha añadido otro cementerio encima.
Conjunto de cambios revertido. Por favor editar correctamente, no es la primera vez que te informo de errores como estos. Si se empiezan hacer cosas así en vez de ayudar se estropea el mapa. 
Un saludo
Ropino (2025-05-14 13:24:54+00:00): Hi,
please check/correct:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/525370843 
525370844, 525370845, 525370846
lanes=70 ?
could be maxspeed?
Thx in advance
Nathan_A_RF (2025-05-31 23:15:24+00:00): Please do not do this. As per the wiki - "The slip roads/ramps are usually considered to "belong" to the through highway they exit and enter". This is predominantly the case classification- and operator-wise too in the UK
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:56:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:54:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
eggie (2025-05-08 14:36:45+00:00): Beste Nijlpaard  Svp niet je paden steeds vastplakken aan de landuse. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=165986000

Dat geeft allerlei problemen. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-08 14:43:25+00:00): Het wordt ook op prijs gesteld als je op opmerkingen zou reageren. Dat heb je tot nu toe geen een keer gedaan.
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15877199
MVG
eggie
yelisey90 (2025-05-08 16:32:37+00:00): სკვერი = сквер ~ park =/= square = მოედანი
То есть то под идее должно быть названием какого-то парка, с en = Erekle Kuloshvili Park
evgenykatyshev (2025-05-09 09:18:55+00:00): Проблема в том, что так на двух языках написано на табличке, которая стоит на столбе за заобром, где я точку поставил.

Наверное, можно положится на грузинское название. Но к чему именно оно относится не очень понятно.
ilias_ (2025-05-08 19:12:06+00:00): Hi! Another friendly tip, please don't draw according to the roof of the building, but rather their actual position. In this case, the imagery is highly tilted, which made the roof move away from the actual position of the building, which made you draw the buildings on the roads, which of course is not the case. Try to finish building on the roof and then selecting the building, clicking M, which is used for moving elements. You can then move them to their actual position. You also do not press Q to square the buildings, which is okay if you don't want to, but is sad, because it's such an easy thing to do and makes the data a hundred times better.
user_22463405 (2025-05-08 20:43:33+00:00): Thank you 😊
MxxCon (2025-05-10 02:20:50+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you tag these crosswalks as uncontrolled, when there are clearly visible traffic signals?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165986656
CasGroenigen (2025-05-10 09:04:22+00:00): Thanks for the catch, ment to marked it as a controlled crossing, think I accidentally clicked unmarked crossing.
rempshaener (2025-05-08 16:36:20+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Aus deinem Änderungssatzkommentar schließe ich, dass es sich bei dem von dir gelöschten Wegstück nicht um die „Werkhausgasse“ handelt. Das Löschen beseitigt den Weg vollständig; auf Luftbildern lässt sich aber erkennen, dass dort ein Weg ist.
Ich schlage daher vor, dass ich in einem ersten Schritt das Löschen rückgängig mache.
Im Anschluss würdest du dann aus

highway=living_street
name=Werkhausgasse
surface=asphalt

ein

highway=service
surface=asphalt

machen.
Einverstanden?

Viele Grüße
parchmann (2025-05-09 05:43:58+00:00): Hi, danke für das Review! Da hätte ich den Änderungskommentar sinnvoller schreiben können. Tatsächlich gibt es da keinen Weg sondern meine private Einfahrt.
rempshaener (2025-05-09 15:41:16+00:00): Hallo,
dann ist das Löschen problematisch.
Das Wegstück habe ich entsprechend wiederhergestellt, den Namen entfernt und auf private Zufahrt umgestellt.
Viele Grüße
Valerio_Bozzolan (2026-02-21 13:08:49+00:00): Ciaao :D Anche qui ho notato creazione di ristorante duplicato "Ramen & Ramen", già esistente da anni, a 1 metro circa. Ho unito i due oggi.

Valgono i suggerimenti in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166020966

Grazie ciaau!
eggie (2025-05-08 14:50:17+00:00): Dag Servé..

Die fietsenstalling lijkt me wel oke, maar waarom heb je een brandgang tussen de woningen verwijderd?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=165987433

MVG
eggie
NVBW_Edit_Nakaner (2025-05-08 14:47:23+00:00): Erfassung 2021-10
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-09 00:26:17+00:00): 000 квартир?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-17 02:30:57+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-09 00:26:32+00:00): Высота 0?
eggie (2025-05-08 15:14:00+00:00): Zou kunnen zo... Er zit zog wel een stuk gras over het water. Dat 'moet' je even terugleggen.
Gr eggie
eggie (2025-05-08 15:16:27+00:00): Die man_made pier zou je evt breder kunnen maken. Dus als vlak taggen 
man_made=pier met area=yes  Dan wordt het een vlak. 
De pier ook nog losmaken van het water aan de bovenzijde.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-17 02:30:58+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705
ilias_ (2025-05-08 19:21:36+00:00): Hi, why did you change these roads from residential to unclassified? They are in residential areas (you yourself added these residential areas) and are right next to apartment buildings, so I don't quite understand this change.
user_22463405 (2025-05-08 20:42:34+00:00): Hi, these streets are major in Oulfa, so I decided to change it to unclassified.
Look at these streets, you will notice that the street is outside the residential area.
ilias_ (2025-05-08 20:50:46+00:00): I see what you mean, but did you read the wiki for highway=unclassified? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified

It says it’s for minor public roads that are *outside* residential areas, meaning outsides cities and villages, just random roads in the middle of nowhere.

These roads are right in the middle of El Oulfa. If you wanted to express the fact that they are “major” roads as in they are a lot more used than a normal residential road, then you should tag them as tertiary, secondary or even primary roads, depending on how much they are used. I myself don’t know how the traffic is there, but if you take a look at Boulevard Al Massira or Boulevard Zerktouni, you’ll see that they are tagged as primary roads. Boulevard Bir Anzarane is secondary, Rue Normandie and Rue Ain Harrouda are tertiary for example. You seem to have a lot more knowledge about El Oulfa so you decide how to tag them accordingly.

It’s great to see that someone edits around El Oulfa, thank you for your work.
user_22463405 (2025-05-08 21:23:40+00:00): Thank you for informations
gscholz (2025-05-12 06:06:50+00:00): Hi Decarvalho7,
your recent changesets have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-56.01512&lat=-4.26293&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

As you may know, htis kind of errors irritates routing software and looks ugly n the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
eggie (2025-05-08 15:39:56+00:00): Lijkt me zo beter. Ik heb nog even die 'pier' als vlak gemapt.
eggie (2025-05-08 15:47:21+00:00): en de vlakken water samengevoegd behalve dan het zwemgedeelte met de aparte tags.
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:56:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-08 15:31:04+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1384703912

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:55:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:57:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:58:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:54:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:53:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
Dodko (2025-05-15 07:23:50+00:00): Tu napríklad budova https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/640612467 má v adrese aj ulicu Orechová aj orientačné číslo 1 a do reštaurácie https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12820383385 ste dali adresu len súpisné číslo bez ulice a orientačného.
EfreetSK (2025-05-15 07:46:59+00:00): Áno, tom som išiel podľa toho čo majú na stránke teda "Orechová 948". Ale chápem
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:54:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:57:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:56:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
user_5359 (2025-05-09 12:09:37+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/640397048. What is the mean of the tag Райна Княгиня = yes ? Did you mean name=Pайна Княгиня ?
plamen (2025-05-09 14:53:10+00:00): Sorry, my fault.
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:53:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
perenniallylate (2025-05-08 17:15:34+00:00): Hallo VisionGrid, wieso verwendest du hier den Tag landuse=meadow? Dieser ist für landwirtschaftliche Wiesen gedacht. Der ursprüngliche Tag landuse=grass trifft für mich hier deutlich besser zu. Ansonsten bietet sich auch landuse=garden an.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165990630
VisionGrid (2025-05-08 17:39:27+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Tipp! War mir da nicht so sicher, da beim Strandbad nebenan auch das Tag landuse=meadow verwendet wurde.
perenniallylate (2025-05-08 20:19:10+00:00): Gerne, besonders am Anfang sind die vielen Tags verwirrend. Am besten immer kurz ins Wiki schauen wenn man unsicher ist, geht auch sehr einfach mit dem "info" Knopf im iD-Editor, den du verwendest. 

Hier zum Beispiel die Wikiseite zu landuse=meadow
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dmeadow
StC (2025-07-26 10:43:10+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire de randonnée qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation. Cela aiderait, à l'avenir, si vous mettiez des commentaires plus pertinents dans vos changesets : c'est plus compliqué à corriger quand on ne connait pas l'intention du contributeur.
Gaboger (2025-07-26 17:57:11+00:00): Bonjour,
Désolé si j'ai fait une erreur. Effectivement début mai je suis allé dans la forêt de Brocéliande afin d'organiser un weekend rando pour notre club du Puy St Bonnet (près de Cholet dans le Maine et Loire) en avril 2026. En effet j'ai fait quelques modifs. Pourriez vous me dire précisément où je me suis trompé ? Je ne voudrais pas avoir de surprise lors de notre sortie club.
Merci d'avance pour votre réponse et encore toutes mes excuses.
Roger Gaboriau
StC (2025-07-26 21:06:17+00:00): Bonsoir,

avec les outils disponibles c'est très difficile de retrouver l'historique des chemins et des itinéraires. Après un peu de recherche, j'ai trouvé :
 - deux chemins qui ne se raccordaient pas à leur extrémité, vers https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314001238
 - deux chemins qui ne se raccordaient pas du tout, vers https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/335259572

Bonne rando !
Hufkratzer (2025-05-08 20:06:03+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1384712480 looks like a horse walker and not like a horse riding centre.
See
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:animal=horse_walker
schoka (2025-10-25 13:36:18+00:00): Hallo schilling5628, du hast dir viel Mühe beim Mappen des Einkaufszentrums gemacht. Die einzelnen Räume/Geschäfte sollten besser als einzelne Räume und nicht als eigenständige Gebäude (building=yes) eingezeichnet werden. Siehe Indoor-Mapping: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:56:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:53:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:57:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
Mannivu (2025-05-08 19:10:23+00:00): Fixed info about bench's backrest
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-17 02:30:59+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-17 02:31:00+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167718705
joost schouppe (2025-06-02 12:12:52+00:00): Small mistake here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146154407 . You set the tower as a place of worship, as well as the main building. I turned both bits into building:part and created a new outline to put the building & amenity tag on
user_18023081 (2025-06-02 19:42:17+00:00): Alright
jcarlson (2025-05-09 17:06:22+00:00): *is* this a driveway? seems like it's only used to access parking spaces
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165992996
user_5359 (2025-05-09 10:16:10+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/739725440. There is a copy & paste error: ref:FR:FANTref:FR:GendarmerieNationaleOIR = 1002464. Please correct this!
felipeeugenio (2025-05-08 16:43:21+00:00): source: SII
Szymson (2025-05-08 17:10:34+00:00): No fajnie, ale tego punktu:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7058291274
nie trzeba było usuwać, teraz się krawężnik i trawnik całkiem rozjechały
Marek-M (2025-05-09 10:29:24+00:00): Przywróciłem ten węzeł. Powinno być już poprawnie.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166021318
Szymson (2025-05-09 13:54:20+00:00): Dzięki :D
user_5359 (2025-05-09 10:02:59+00:00): Hello! What is the mean of the key Tununngasuarusiq? Waht is the difference to place=island/islet (see wiki)?
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-09 00:23:42+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166006848
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-09 00:23:52+00:00):  👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-10 11:17:20+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and nonsense tagging, plus possible Google Maps source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183918406
gscholz (2025-05-12 06:06:55+00:00): Hi Decarvalho7,
your recent changesets have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-56.01512&lat=-4.26293&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

As you may know, htis kind of errors irritates routing software and looks ugly n the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
voltairovicz (2025-05-09 09:44:31+00:00): Ale to czy sa wiaty to istotna informacja dla przegladajace mape, chowa ja niepotrzebnie i psuje caly odbior stacji, jak inaczej zakomunikac jej obecnosc
Anas masuris (2025-05-09 09:51:59+00:00): To już proszę się czepiać Carto, że w taki sposób renderuje tj. perony mają większą hierarchię. Na to akurat nic nie poradzę

Ikony wiat są renderowane (amenity-shelter), a dodatkowe informacje można dodać na peronie tj. shelter=yes.

Wymuszanie renderowania w ten sposób też daje błędną informację czytelnikowi - abnormalny kształt peronu lub duża część powierzchni wyłączona z użytku (niebędąca peronem). Wiem, jaka jest intencja, natomiast jest to tagowanie pod render
voltairovicz (2025-05-09 10:06:19+00:00): Generalnie dzieki bardzo za wszelkie pozostale edycje, jakis czas temu mocno edytowalem wiadukt na Zeromskiego i nie bylem w stanie pozyskac znikad dokumentacji technicznej, wiec do konca dokladnie nie bylo, takze twoimi szczegolowymi edycjami pomogles bardzo wiele. Ostanio Awizonosz nagral mega dokladny film z tej stacji, wiec bedzie mozna jeszcze troche poprawek zrobic ;)
Anas masuris (2025-05-09 10:08:47+00:00): Proszsz :) - projekt jest dostępny na BIP Radom (ale i tak musiałem dużo korygować, bo zmienili układ schodów, wind i ścieżek)

https://bip.mzdik.pl/mzd/zamowienia-publiczne/postepowania/2022/16141,Postepowanie-nr-NZ2603612022-pn-Przebudowa-wiaduktu-w-ul-Zeromskiego-w-Radomiu-n.html
Filip009 (2025-05-09 07:54:28+00:00): Hello, this reconstruction will last just few days, it is reccomended to put into maps only reconstructions which will take longer than 6 months.
welzheimerwald (2025-12-01 20:22:30+00:00): Warum wurde das Naturschutzgebiet Vogtsberg erst verkleinert und dann ganz gelöscht? Die Schutzgebietverordnung müsste nach wie vor in Kraft sein.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-08 17:30:54+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2917277914
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266102523

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MarcelLeePL (2025-05-08 18:24:11+00:00): Jak zatem przypisać adres do kilku budynków?
MassCartog (2025-05-08 19:08:10+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM, and thanks for your work so far. In this changeset you left a section of driveway floating with no connection after you removed some of the road. If roads are tagged incorrectly please try to correct them instead of removing them. In this case turning that section of road into a driveway looks right. I went ahead and did that in changeset 165995383 as an example. Thanks
MassCartog (2025-05-21 15:42:49+00:00): [no user response]
IllOnlyBeAMinute (2025-05-22 11:53:47+00:00): Calling a driveway a road is a bit disingenuous.
MassCartog (2025-05-22 13:35:05+00:00): yup thats why I tagged it as a driveway. The issue was you left a section of driveway floating with no connection to another way, this was incorrect.
StC (2025-06-23 19:42:14+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset (ou l'un des précédents dans la même zone)  a supprimé un bout du Chemin du Moulin de Rouaix, et ce faisant interrompu un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Pouvez-vous regarder svp ?
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:54:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
Geim (2025-05-14 14:04:10+00:00): Klopt het dat je deze nog op construction hebt laten staan? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1298603579/history
martiensch (2025-05-14 14:49:16+00:00): Achterste stukje is nog niet klaar.
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:01:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping