piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Norbert Dichter (2026-02-02 20:28:52+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177490315
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-23 15:22:52+00:00): I don't think Maxar is a valid source for edits after July 2023.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maxar
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177490396
Baloo Uriza (2026-03-23 15:00:33+00:00): You seem to have made a complete hash of things by ignoring lane tags.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177490396
SomeoneElse (2026-01-23 12:45:32+00:00): Hello,

Andy from the DWG here.  Unfortunately, there are a couple of problems here that have caused one of the locals to contact us.  For reference I'm using http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=177490636 to see "before and after" of this change.

One issue that I can see with it is the deletion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1184613232/history .  I added that back in 2023 as someone had been trying to create a "path" from the driveway to the nature reserve by knocking a hole in the wall at https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=20/55.8952239/-4.6184957 .  You've deleted that line saying "there is not a path here", and there is now nothing to indicate that there is definitely NOT a path there.  There have been attempts to make changes in this area via "feedback" to commercial remote OSM editors, and those remote editors' verification of information received is sometimes not great.  

The other is that the change in geometry of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1171570694 is incorrect.  There's a kink in the driveway at https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/55.896171/-4.617857 that isn't very clear on all aerial imagery (though if you look you can see it on various Esri imagery).  This was very clear on a series of photographs that the DWG were provided with by one of the driveway residents back in 2023.

A third change (of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1171577228/history from gravel service road to track) is arguably also incorrect - there's no agricultural access here; it's just access to private properties, although this other usage of "track" is not unknown in OSM.

Also, apparently elsewhere in Kilmacolm you've added 30mph limits where they are actually 20.  We haven't been provided with a specific example of a problem but I suspect that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/91006628/history may be one.  We have been provided with https://www.inverclyde.gov.uk/environment/roads-lighting/rollout-of-20mph-speed-limits#:~:text=The%20speed%20limit%20on%20most,follows%20a%20comprehensive%20analysis%20of as a link to the policy.

My apologies if this reads like a list of problems when all you've been trying to do is to improve the map locally (including adding things like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1468857032/history which were just not there before), but the issue with the driveway has been the subject of a series of legal issues.  

Something that might help is to look at the history of objects and previous changesets and comments.  For example, if you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1171577228/history you can see I've added information not just to my changeset comments but also in detail as discussion comments too.   

Best Regards,
Andy (from the DWG)

PS: If you'd like to contact the DWG directly about this ticket you can email data@openstreetmap.org with a subject line of "[Ticket#2026010810000309] changeset/177490636".
SomeoneElse (2026-01-29 12:49:42+00:00): I've fixed the two most serious problems in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177845809 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177846221 .
The "30mph limits that should be 20" obviously need someone to survey them properly on the ground.
JAAS (2026-01-28 17:53:28+00:00): Hola zerok12s,

Tengo duda respecto a qué tipo de oficina corresponde esto. Tampoco me hace mucho sentido que sea un edificio de 2 niveles con 20 metros de altura. ¿Podrías aclararme acerca de esto, por favor?

Saludos,
JAAS
Fgjgdrou (2026-01-20 19:26:50+00:00): Also see changesets listed below for some minor post-edit fixes (adding small missed sections, removing stubs, removing duplicate entries/correcting order):
177491370
177491435
177491497
177491591
marczoutendijk (2026-01-20 19:22:22+00:00): Highways = Landuse!!!
msevilla00 (2026-01-22 16:24:07+00:00): Hola, bienvenida a la comunidad y al proyecto OSM,
No se si estás probando pero esta edición en concreto no es correcta.
Dinos a ver
Gracias
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-23 00:54:44+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/707999025

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-23 01:14:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/707999025

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2026-02-28 12:02:09+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings
A: Inaccurate mapping. 
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.



Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177492115
NeisBot (2026-01-21 07:26:05+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13471581969 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cryotherapy clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 07:32:55+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177792511
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
CharliePlett (2026-01-20 20:39:42+00:00): Thank you
Patrick78 (2026-01-20 20:21:22+00:00): Bonjour
Attention vous avez ajouté un piste cyclable sous la D675 sans spécifier si elle est sur le coté par ex. Il faut utiliser les attributs cycleway left et right pour cela en suivant le guide: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle
Merci de corriger vos modifications pour respecter le wiki. Cdlt
AlbaireN (2026-03-10 18:16:40+00:00): Je pense qu'il n'y a rien de cyclable ici.
https://api.panoramax.xyz/?focus=pic&map=20.33/49.2811953/0.1782916&pic=3dbe5b68-9b31-4517-88bc-db308693d899&seq=eb14d44a-bdf2-410c-8220-ba737fce3a65&speed=250&theme=type&xyz=217.91/-11.56/30
Patrick78 (2026-03-10 20:41:52+00:00): Bjr, il y a bien une piste cyclable entre le cimetière et le rond-point voir:
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/ortho-photos-opendata-openortho_278682#19/49.279711/0.176076
et vous retrouvez les travaux là: https://www.pontleveque.fr/travaux-cote-de-caen-a-partir-du-18-aout-jusqua-fin-octobre-2025/ 
donc oui il y a une piste cyclable je pense sur le coté droit en montant. mais cela reste à confirmer d'où mon interrogation à l'époque.
Bonne recherche. Cdlt, Patrick
notmyproblem1 (2026-01-21 21:53:54+00:00): Ciao! per Via bosco del guadio potresti usare il nome locale se coloro di questa zona la chiamano cosi, usando il tag;
loc_name=Via Bosco del Guadio
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-23 00:54:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1468883609

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-23 01:14:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1468883609

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2026-01-20 20:17:16+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

De camping was nu 2x getagd. Ik heb de info samengevoegd.
Is de naam van de haven werkelijk Boot & Kanoverhuur LaDure?

Er is een aparte tag voor bootverhuur. Dat kan op een node.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dboat_rental

MVG
eggie
StC (2026-02-09 20:57:47+00:00): Bonjour,

encore un changeset qui casse un itinéraire, et un commentaire qui n'aide pas... Je vais tenter la réparation.
NeisBot (2026-01-21 07:23:48+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1468888746 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1468888760 v1 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177493239
NeisReview (2026-01-28 07:32:35+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177555446
https://osm.org/changeset/177589364
rempshaener (2026-01-20 20:22:21+00:00): Hallo,
die Bilder sind mit Html-Syntax falsch verlinkt.
Statt
<a href="http://hydranten.ff-aigen.de/Sportplatz.jpg">Sportplatz</a>
bitte einfach
ttp://hydranten.ff-aigen.de/Sportplatz.jpg
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2026-01-20 20:25:39+00:00): Darüber hinaus:
Das Tagging ist ziemlich schief.
Bitte einmal alles löschen und wie folgt ersetzen:

colour=silver
couplings:diameters=A
couplings=1
emergency=fire_hydrant
fire_hydrant:position=green
fire_hydrant:pressure=suction
fire_hydrant:type=pipe
image=http://hydranten.ff-aigen.de/Sportplatz.jpg 
water_source=groundwater
Feuerwehr Aigen am Inn (2026-01-20 20:35:56+00:00): Guten Abend, 

muss ich leider mit dem HTML-Tag setzen, damits auf osmhydrant.org korrekt angezeigt wird. 

Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2026-01-20 20:50:39+00:00): Hallo,

das ist dann leider ein Fehler in OSMHydrant. Das darf nicht dazu führen, dass Daten passend für einen Auswerter eingetragen werden.
Bitte ohne Html-Syntax eintragen und den Fehler bei OSMHydrant melden.

Viele Grüße
vasony (2026-01-21 21:44:36+00:00): Szia!

Ezeknek a Gergely utcai épületeknek mi a pontos címek, 106/A vagy 106 A épület, esetleg 106 A lépcsőház? Mert a 106A nem túl egyértelmű

Tamás
toemke (2026-01-22 05:13:10+00:00): Szia! Ez a lakópark nagyon érdekes, mert a teljes terület Gergely utca 102-108-ként szerepel. A terület egyes részei viszont 102, 104, 106 és 108-ra vannak felosztva és azon belül az épületek 102A, 102B stb. Szóval itt nem arról van szó, hogy telepen az épületnek vagy lépcsúháznak van egy betüjele is, hanem ez a cím (azon lehet vitázni, hogy kell e per-jel vagy nem). A google maps-en helyesen szerepelnek az egyes épületek címei, illetve az oeny.hu hrsz keresőjében is egyértelműek a címek (ott egyedül a 102-nél van egy hrsz az összes épületre): https://www.oeny.hu/oeny/hrsz-kereso/?state=JTdCJTIydHlwZSUyMiUzQTMlMkMlMjJ4JTIyJTNBNjU3NzEzLjQxMzY1NjQwNDglMkMlMjJ5JTIyJTNBMjM2NDcxLjY2NjI4NjI1NjM3JTdE

Péter
vasony (2026-01-22 06:03:05+00:00): Szia!

Az oeny alapján ez telekosztás jó béna, azt kell mondjam, mert e szerint egyértelműen 104/a 106/a , viszont a 102 az meg egy telek, és az albetétek sorszámozása is az épületeket sejteti ezeknél.

A 102F lehet kiírva, de hivatalosan nem lehet cím, vagy 102/f vagy 102 F épület/lépcsőház. (Budapesten a vonatkozó rendelet szerint a /f kisbetűvel, az épület meg nagy betűvel)

Szóval ha ez alapján akarnám jelölni akkor 
- addr:housenumber=104/a 
- addr:housenumber=102 + addr:unit=A

Amit most 106F-re jelöltél az meg 108/f, ezt csak elírtad?

Tamás
toemke (2026-01-22 07:35:00+00:00): Igen, a 108-akat elírtam mind...
A többit is javítottam most.
ratrun (2026-01-22 05:01:17+00:00): Stop adding crap to the data! Deleted!
*Martin* (2026-01-22 07:50:35+00:00): construction=house nie je dobre na celu plochu, lebo to hovori, ze tam stavaju jeden obrovsky dom
Rick Richards (2026-01-22 20:32:05+00:00): Vďaka za upozornenie. Zmenené na construction=residential tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177582030
vasony (2026-01-21 21:35:42+00:00): Szia!

A residential >service típusú módosítások nem helyesek, ezek residential utak. (service != szervizút magyarul)
Tipikusan service a gyártelepek, benzinkutak, kocsibehajtók, parkolók útjai

ld:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice

Tamás
Tamás
toemke (2026-01-22 05:01:47+00:00): Szia! Igen, ezt értem és elég sokat vaciláltam,  hogy mi lenne a jó megoldás. Az újhegyi lakótelepen elég labirintusszerűen, szerteágazóan mennek az utak, nem egyértelmű, hogy melyik vonalvezetés "az utca", és melyik rész tekinthető szervízútnak. Másrészt a lakótelep utcáinak 70%-a szervízútként szerepelt, ezért a többséghez igazítottam a maradékot. De akkor az összes névvel ellátott utat residentalre fogom venni.
michel60 (2026-01-27 16:47:32+00:00): Bonjour,
La ligne de bus Relation : Ligne 4 : Fayet Centre Commercial -> E. Jaulmes -> SPA (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14718206)
est passée en défaut : visible avec GEOFABRIK OSM Inspector avec le lien ci-dessous :
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=3.28576&lat=49.85424&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.86&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
Cordialement Michel
Vermandois (2026-01-27 20:51:21+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci de me l'avoir signalé ! J'ai l'impression que l'ordre des ways de cette dernière partie de la relation s'est inversée quand j'ai coupé le way à la frontière entre Rouvroy et Morcourt. 
Normalement, je les ai remises dans l'ordre (groupe de modifs 177779605). Je regarderai demain si c'est bon sur OSM Inspector. Merci !
Bonne soirée
michel60 (2026-01-27 22:02:01+00:00): Bonsoir,
Ça vient peut être des outils qui ne sont pas adaptés,  mais ces relations sont difficiles à maintenir. 
Merci
Vermandois (2026-01-28 10:54:45+00:00): Bonjour,

Effectivement : JOSM ne signale pas, à l'envoi, qu'il y a un problème dans l'ordre des membres de la relation, et je ne pensais pas le casser, la première fois. Ce segment de relation présente en plus la difficulté que les voies y sont présentes deux fois, pour que le bus revienne au terminus après avoir fait le tour du rond-point.

Ma modification d'hier soir avait réparé une partie et cassé une autre ; j'espère que ma modification de ce matin (groupe de modifs 177794144) a réglé le problème pour de bon.

Bonne journée
NeisBot (2026-01-20 20:36:22+00:00): Hi AlimiGaming1, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 88% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 building(s)
- 129 landuse(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177494302
AlimiGaming1 (2026-01-20 20:38:41+00:00): Hello, thank you for the message.
Yes, the deletions were intentional. I was correcting farmland areas that were incorrect or overlapping.
If something was removed incorrectly, please let me know and I will fix it.
I am still learning OpenStreetMap and appreciate your feedback
NeisBot (2026-01-21 07:26:06+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/4584747664 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Medical office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 07:32:55+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177792512
(No visible changes after review)
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 06:42:54+00:00): Hello!

You used
building=garagerr
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306749586/history

Have you maybe meant
building=garage
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Herr Bause (2026-02-04 08:09:24+00:00): Thanks for pointing that out.
Yes, it was a typo, I've changed it.
Best regards
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 10:08:45+00:00): thanks for a fix!
finn-hound (2026-01-20 20:45:39+00:00): Also added kerbs
NeisBot (2026-01-21 07:23:53+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 75 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1468906892 v1 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/912248675 v5 | 10 crossings
https://osm.org/way/741738631 v10 | 9 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/2468493238 v4
https://osm.org/node/304958904 v4
https://osm.org/node/8474407236 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177494673
eggie (2026-01-20 21:18:29+00:00): In OSM gebruiken we alleen officiele straatnamen.. Deze namen heb ik ondergebracht bij de tag description.
MVG
eggie
czdawes (2026-01-20 20:50:55+00:00): Zdroje:
Link 1 - https://www.oxpoint.cz/?utm_source=firmy.cz&utm_medium=ppd&utm_campaign=firmy.cz-13441965

Link 2 - https://www.firmy.cz/detail/13441965-ox-point-navsi.html
kapi1525 (2026-01-21 08:58:34+00:00): Nie powinno być *Rybnik* Meksyk Kolejowa? By nazwa pasowała do reszty przystanków w mieście?
Swoją drogą, `bus=yes` na zwykłych przystankach jest zbędne.
jjyach (2026-01-20 21:56:46+00:00): It seems like 5+ years ago Douglas County dropped out of the DRCOG naming scheme of roads and mostly dropped directions in the names.  So a ton of roads in douglas county have not been updated to reflect that.
TheNightRider (2026-01-21 03:42:56+00:00): Interesting. BTW, this street doesn't even need a West (or East) because it only extends for a few blocks west of Broadway, the east-west divider for metro Denver. To the east of Broadway the name changes to Dad Clark Drive. It always makes for troublesome navigation when the street you're on suddenly changes its name, but I'm not in charge of that. :)
TheNightRider (2026-01-21 03:50:32+00:00): So did they actually change the street signs about 5+ years ago to get rid of West and East?
notmyproblem1 (2026-01-21 21:49:12+00:00): tutto il negozio è Elisa Ceramics?

tutto l'edificio è un (1) piano?
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-23 00:54:36+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314650238

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-23 01:14:38+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314650238

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-22 16:39:27+00:00): Should be checked by the local community. Thanks!

Best regards,
Pascal
DaveF (2026-01-22 00:41:41+00:00): Could you expand on what edits you've made & what you mean by "as a curiosity to see how some UK tagging would compare to what I'm used to elsewhere"
TranslatorPS (2026-01-22 07:33:56+00:00): Most of the edits are signalling-related - I added a number of signals in the general London area, and this is where that statement came out of. The large bounding box came out of adding wikidata tags to a bunch of relations that iD suggested.
felipeeugenio (2026-01-24 12:51:45+00:00): Hola
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177495926
felipeeugenio (2026-01-24 12:53:12+00:00): Hola
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-22 16:39:32+00:00): Should be checked by the local community. Thanks!

Best regards,
Pascal
I-76 (2026-01-21 15:15:40+00:00): Hey MikeyDude,
Just wanted you to know that the gas station is marked separately from the convenience store already, where the pumps are. Feel free to name it if has a name.
Jordi MF (2026-01-20 21:49:57+00:00): Article on s'explica per què Bellreguard és invariable: https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh8XmlNHYZ-dQ2O40b06ergTElelMrkxBu-6P-qlYzeGvIAgu-ktJh4K8h52SR9o_v7LNMUpxImmi6M_MElbXwMU2F8-KlBW_yOfu6aWVRI22A8DPYToIDGH7LhbF6mjyQDWSwrEB9gbZs9/s1600/Bellreguard.jpg i https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhoszsUrwk70MjHz9J0R8BpZ2reRcVDeksMRvTyXlbyLw5X0T0lg_7S_b-GPqn-QjQ7Nhw8ftMXq_3zTZ1XYEjGkt5EcVL6nkMj1Mv-jf4TiRTFyxBoPNKB8Z7pnmcVjj4mRC3QgEl5a77H/s1600/Bellreguard+1.jpg
notmyproblem1 (2026-01-21 21:04:13+00:00): Ciao! Per l'instagram si usa "contact:instagram" oppure "instagram=" e non come da lei messo come sito web, La ringraziamo di essere un contributore openstreetmap.
NeisBot (2026-01-21 07:26:09+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13471737105 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Michelle's Patisserie bakery"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 07:32:55+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177792513
(No visible changes after review)