piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DniproRiver (2023-01-13 09:11:32+00:00): Hello, thank you for reaching out. I can see that while making alignment changes to the area I caused self intersecting highways, thank you for pointing this out and for the revision.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:29:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:19:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:58:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:46:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:54:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:46:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
aTarom (2023-01-09 13:46:44+00:00): Hola Dalfgan, gracias por editar,
se ha quedado un tag con
"MTB"="s2"
en esta vía
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1128414349/history
quizás es
"mtb:scale"="2"?

No encuentro algo más parecido en 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking

Saludos
leheng (2023-01-09 09:23:12+00:00): source:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_territories_in_Singapore

precedent:Baarle-Hertog
DUGA (2023-01-17 20:35:26+00:00): I don't think it is paved.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12035622/history#map=16/41.8248/-75.5097
Richard (2023-01-17 21:27:34+00:00): Happily defer to you on that one! It looked paved to me from imagery and Bing StreetSide but always pleased to be proved wrong.
DUGA (2024-04-22 16:42:10+00:00): Unfortunately it is not paved.

If you do not live around, do not tag surface just based on the online photos.
Jakka (2023-05-29 07:44:10+00:00): dit "fietspad" (is er een D7) loopt vast ? één zijde niet verbonden ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/950052929
Ruben Van de Velde (2023-05-29 07:50:19+00:00): Moet nog steeds verbonden zijn. Fout ligt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136682170
RobinOfCroxley (2023-01-09 09:42:41+00:00): The path is wider than a standard path. For most of the way it is a carriageway's width. It is new, and good asphalt.
The Clarke Close end is finished with block work.
With a bit more reflection: the incorrect road I deleted is somebody's drive, I think, looking at the satellite map. It is private, and only of use to them, really.
Pixel Runner (2023-01-23 10:11:26+00:00): Hey @Strimplers, just noticed you changed the name of "Adames Field" to "Adams Field".

The legal and registered address of the road is "Adames Field".

For ref, check out the Royal mail address finder and search for postcode "PO19 6FB".

I understand the street sign locally has a typo incorrectly missing the "e" in the name, but they have told me that this is being reprinted to show the correct name.

I have put the name back to the correct spelling ("Adames").
gscholz (2023-01-10 06:45:03+00:00): Hi UztaxiSamarkand,
this changeset has created an significant error as it assigned "building=yes" to the boundary area of "Samarqand". Please watch out what you are doing. And again a descriptive changeset comment is missing:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Please start improving your mapping style.
Guido
gscholz (2023-01-10 06:45:23+00:00): Btw. I just fixed this error.
Guido
nevw (2023-01-10 00:18:29+00:00): Hi
you have not used any tags that the osm database users can interpret to utilise/display you business.
Please try again using this link to assist
https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/18/-38.02354/145.31268 Do not use abbreviations
nevw (2023-01-10 00:29:49+00:00): ...or the help site you used is not ideal.
here is a business site that is tagged well...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4607581052
CurlingMan13 (2023-01-09 16:25:19+00:00): What source can be used to validate that the business is actually here?  the website provided does not show a location at this address.  Please verify.

Thanks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-05 23:34:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136992226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting spam
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:09:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
ma-rt-in (2023-01-09 20:57:38+00:00): Hallo,
was genau wolltest du nun mit dem fixme bewirken?

vg
DD1GJ (2023-01-10 20:17:15+00:00): Siehe Kommentar bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131019074
dadavid (2023-03-30 12:12:21+00:00): Hi, 
du hast hier den building=yes tag gelöscht und durch ein area=yes ersetzt. Wieso soll es sich hierbei nicht um ein Gebäude handeln?
Ich habe den tag jetzt mal wieder hinzugefügt, bzw das etwas spezifischere Tagging building=kindergarten verwendet, um zu zeigen, dass es sich hier um ein Kindergartengebäude handelt. Der Kindergarten selbst (amenity=kindergarten) umfasst ja das gesamte Gelände incl Spielfläche etc. und ist hier verpflegt osm.org/way/759179365
Wenn du Fragen zum Unterschied zwischen building=kindergarten und amenity=kindergarten hast, schaue gern einmal ins wiki, analog auch bei building=school (Schulgebäude) und amenity=school (Die gesamte Schule incl Pausenhof und weiterer Gebäude)
wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building=kindergarten
und https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dschool

Grüße
silversurfer83 (2023-01-11 21:35:58+00:00): Hi :)
Bin gerade über deine Änderungen gestolpert und möchte dich auf diesen Artikel im Wiki hinweisen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Grüße
silversurfer83
A-Rth-Urp-Hil-Ipdenu (2025-06-05 18:21:04+00:00): Hi,

As bicycle, horse, motor_vehicle=yes for way 30246707, could I remove the permissive_footpath tag?

Thanks
lololailo (2023-01-09 12:53:01+00:00): Hola, esa puerta existe lo que pasa es que siempre está abierta, aunque algo más arriba hay carteles de prohibido continuar por las instalaciones militares. Creo que has utilizado etiquetas que no existen. Pero como has añadido tu, la etiqueta locked=yes seria suficiente, creo que no es necesario añadir ninguna otra etiqueta.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131047945
lololailo (2023-01-09 12:54:27+00:00): Perdón quería decir locked=no
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131047945
reigi (2023-01-10 05:30:04+00:00): Hallo jorisbro, was war deine Überlegung beim Hinzufügen des tags bicycle=yes an den beiden Wegen am Friedhof? ich bin der Meinung, das ist unnötig, da bicycle=yes bei einem track impliziert ist. Siehe dazu das Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131047958
Jorisbo (2023-01-10 08:53:28+00:00): Hallo Reigi! Danke für Deine chat. Die wiki seite ist nur für 'Default access restrictions', im falle nichts besserers angegeben. Es ist nicht falsch mehr genauere anzeigen zu machen wo auf routing apps sich basieren können. Im falle Fahräder nicht erlaubt sind ist es naturlich falsch. Freundlichen Grussen, Joris
reigi (2023-01-10 16:31:07+00:00): Da gebe ich dir natürlich recht, dass du zusätzliche Tags eingeben kannst. Sinnvoll finde ich das in diesem Fall aber nicht. Dann müsstest du bicycle=yes auch bei allen anderen geeigneten Wegen angeben. Aber... jeder wie er möchte. Hätte ja sein können, dass du etwas Spezielles damit erreichen wollen.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:39:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Harfeur (2023-01-10 17:32:41+00:00): Bonjour, je viens de vérifier votre changement. Pensez à l'avenir à faire deux modifications au lieu d'une lorsque celles-ci sont éloignées.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131048216
Kovoschiz (2023-01-10 02:25:45+00:00): Please read the `note=`. This section is Tunnel Area. On the left is the bay for management vehicles.
Kovoschiz (2023-01-10 02:26:14+00:00): Of course I will support changing Tunnel Area from `=motorway` to `=trunk`. But here I have already not added any restrictions.
Eifelkobold! (2023-01-09 17:51:03+00:00): Moin, das letzte Mal als ich dort war, waren LKW noch vom Durchfahrtsverbot ausgenommen. Hat sich das geändert?
Jorisbo (2023-01-09 18:13:25+00:00): Hallo Eifelkobold! danke fur deine aufmerksamkeit. Ich habe hgv=	excepted interpretiert wie 'nicht erlaubt'. Ich habe es geändert in hgv=yes. Freundlichen grussen, Joris
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-10 00:30:33+00:00): boa noite, se a área não tem nome próprio ou voce nao sabe o nome, não coloque nomes genericos como parquinho,, CEL, quadra tenis, etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:40:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-12 17:29:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8776948661/history - have you intended to make it shop=confectionery?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:29:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:44:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:44:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
BCNorwich (2023-01-10 10:17:38+00:00): Hi, You have several warnings listed above regarding crossing highways and waterways. It would be really good practice to try and resolve these issues.

Regarding the public bridleway (Way: 1128433774) foot is designated on a public bridleway, I've amended it.
Also Way: 1128438551 duplicates Way: 1128433774, I've removed the duplication.

Regards Bernard
NorthCrab (2023-01-09 21:18:56+00:00): Ale po co KRZYCZEĆ, przeniosłem mickiewicza warszawa do branch.
The_Raven (2025-02-01 16:53:34+00:00): Habe heute dieses Dach von OSM entfernt weil es nicht mehr da ist. War das richtig oder war dieser Eintrag "Virtuell" damit man weiss das es mal hier stand?
mueschel (2025-02-01 17:24:45+00:00): Da kann ich wenig dazu sagen, ich hatte hier nur einen Tippfehler korrigiert. Wenn sich Leute dafür interessieren könnten, kann man das Objekt sicher auch noch länger in OSM lassen damit es gefunden wird, inklusive dem Verweis auf den neuen Standort. Falsch ist das Löschen aber auch nicht.
The_Raven (2025-02-01 18:55:36+00:00): Danke dir für die Antwort. Habe zwischenzeitlich noch etwas darüber gelesen/geforscht. Ist echt etwas kniffelig (löschen oder lassen). Ich glaube aber löschen ist die "bessere" Option. Ich lasse es daher mal so. Gute Zeit und happy mapping! :-)
eggie (2023-01-09 11:35:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
user_5359 (2023-01-11 08:33:50+00:00): Hello! Please notice your typo use is_in:country instead of is:in_counrty. I will correct this.
Jemimah Mukisa (2023-01-11 09:17:18+00:00): Alright, thank you.
BCNorwich (2023-01-09 14:00:26+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The school was tagged as per OSM best practice with the main tags being on the school premises outline. Please see here for more details:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=school

Thus I've reverted this changeset.

Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2023-01-09 14:18:32+00:00): Hi, I think these are semi detached houses, so if drawn as one building then the tag is building=residential. A building that is a single house would be tagged building=house.

If you zoom in further you will be able to draw the buildings much more accurately. And to be even neater use the square-up feature.

Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2023-01-10 10:29:15+00:00): Hi, Sorry but again warnings above that ought to be looked at.

Way: 1128438557 duplicates Way: 1128433780 so I've removed it.

Way: 1128433780 also twice crosses a stream, is there possibly a bridge or ford here?

Way: 1128438558 duplicates Way: 1128438558 so I've removed it.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2023-01-10 10:32:50+00:00): Duplicated Way: 1128438559 is removed.
BCNorwich (2023-01-11 07:42:03+00:00): Another duplicated way, Way: 1128438556 I've removed. Please go back and check your mapping.
Artek (2023-01-09 18:48:55+00:00): Cześć, po co zamieniasz z powrotem tagi bus_stop do węzła na drodze? Znak powinien być na przystanku gdzie platforma lub pobocze a na drodze tylko stop_position.
Ropino (2023-01-10 18:17:31+00:00): Hi,
What do you mean with:
"highway=Strada Comunale Acquarella-Santo Scalone I"?
Please have a look at:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
Marcello Rolli (2023-01-11 09:03:31+00:00): Ciao, Highway=unclassified         
 Strada pubblica in genere extraurbana
Ropino (2023-01-11 10:10:03+00:00): Hi,
I changed back to building=yes and removed the highway-tag.
Marcello Rolli (2023-01-11 10:30:58+00:00): perchè
Marcello Rolli (2023-01-11 10:32:42+00:00): quello è un edificio con numero civico, la strada comunale è altra cosa
Ropino (2023-01-11 12:27:32+00:00): Correct: "building" is back to the building. I removed the (wrong) highway-tag...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/421168190/history
Marcello Rolli (2023-01-11 13:47:55+00:00): ok, ti prego solo di non toccare le strade comunali.....ci sono anni di lavoro mio e di altri amici. ciao
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:16:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Artek (2023-01-17 17:14:16+00:00): Cześć, co z tymi przystankami?
matema (2023-01-18 12:28:37+00:00): Cześć, z przystankami jest taki problem, że w niektórych miastach (Kraków, Wrocław) są oznaczane w sposób, który ty prezentujesz. Ja natomiast w tagowaniu przystanków wzorowałem się na Łodzi czy Warszawie. Problemem jest chyba brak ogólnego określenia sposobu tagowania. Zależy mi na tym, by wszystkie przystanki w danym mieście były otagowane w tej sam sposób.
Artek (2023-01-18 15:10:44+00:00): Właśnie w Łodzi jest stary sposób tagowania też. 
Jak coś to pozamieniam na ten nowy sposób, bo dużo przystanków ma wprowadzone platformy.
miche101 (2023-01-10 07:57:57+00:00): Vorsicht beim Löschen

XMas Objekte bitte drin lassen.. wurde diese Jahr wieder aufgebaut.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10203893175

Hab es schon wieder eingetragen.

Gruß Miche
Wegeschlenzer (2023-01-10 10:39:55+00:00): Servus Miche,
wie gibst du z.B. die "Eis"-Bahn am Schrannenplatz ein? Die war ja nach Weihnachten schon wieder abgebaut.
Setzt du da einen Termin für die wiederkehrenden Einrichtungen? Dann hat das Enddatum nicht gepasst... 
Lass es mich wissen, ich lerne da gerne dazu :-)
Gruß
Wegeschlenzer
miche101 (2023-01-10 12:33:02+00:00): Das sind spezielle Weihnachtsobjekte... es wäre ja Käse die jedes Jahr einzutragen, löschen, eintragen, löschen usw. bitte drin lassen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:xmas:feature
Wegeschlenzer (2023-01-19 20:19:47+00:00): Schon klar, aber dann müsstest du auch die Verkaufsbuden einzeichnen, die sogar etwas länger standen als die Schlittschuhbahn, die weniger als 10% der Jahreszeit verfügbar ist... Außerdem ist es nie ganz sicher, dass sie wieder an diesem Platz aufgebaut wird. In der Pandemie auch mal gar nicht. Also, so ganz verstehe ich dich da nicht...
miche101 (2023-01-20 08:55:18+00:00): ja der markt ist auch eingetragen.. 

>Außerdem ist es nie ganz sicher,
Ganz sicher ist alles nicht, ob die Geschäfte alle überleben weiss man auch nicht.. aber dort ist es auch kein Grund diese zu löschen.

>Also, so ganz verstehe ich dich da nicht...
Das ist eine der vielen Sachen die man Mappen kann.. andere mappen Ski-Pisten.. da könnte man auch sagen dass sich das nicht rentiert
Firefishy (2023-01-09 15:46:11+00:00): Nice addition! Thank you for adding local knowledge to OpenStreetMap. Any additional improvements appreciated. https://every-door.app/ (Android + Apple) or https://streetcomplete.app/ (Android only) are great cellphone apps for adding detail.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:23:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Samuele Battarra (2023-01-09 21:04:30+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che hai cambiato i tag per la pista ciclabile. In realtà è una ciclopedonale, ed era taggata già nel modo migliore. Se preferisci cycleway diventa superfluo il bicycle=designated.
SimonTheGolds (2023-01-09 21:51:49+00:00): Ciao, grazie. Devo aver fatto confusione: l'avevo vista marrone e volevo renderla ciclo-pedonale, ma forse ho sbagliato qualcosa.
gscholz (2023-01-10 06:49:03+00:00): Hi microlentsystem,
I have just reverted this changeset as it created serious errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131052526

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=73.05180&lat=26.12807&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Guido
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Baloo Uriza (2023-03-18 19:29:38+00:00): The move from destination to destination:street was definitely wrong in this case.  These tags do mean two different things, and street names don't belong in destination=*.
mpatsevich_lyft (2023-03-20 13:13:14+00:00): Hi, Baloo Uriza
My name is Marina, and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thanks for bringing this to your attention. At this point in the OSM wiki, there isn’t any definition of when the destination:street tag is used (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Item:Q1221). At the same time, there are several discussions about the tag usage: 
Talk:Proposed features/Destination details (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Destination_details#destination:street?:~:text=(talk)-,destination%3Astreet%3F,-I%27ve%20seen%20the); 
Proposed features (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Destination_details#destination:street:~:text=language%20code%3A%20en);
Discuss destination:street (https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/3592). 
We adhere to the logic according to a proposal from Minh Nguen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Minh_Nguyen/destination:street. There are some examples of the same opinion: the comment (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132993570) to the changeset, or discuss in Slack (https://app.slack.com/client/T029HV94T/C2VJAJCS0/thread/C2VJAJCS0-1655772384.310139), where mappers refer to this proposal. 
If you have more information about this tag, we would be very grateful to you for sharing it. We would really like to learn more about the use of ‘destination:street’ in order to apply it in the most correct way.
Best regards,
Marina
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
bielebog (2023-01-09 20:38:00+00:00): Hallo grubehunky,

schön, dass Du dabei bist. Das Projekt lebt von Leuten mit Ortskenntnis.

Den Radwegweiser https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3862490229 , der hier ins Feld verrutscht¹ war hab ich eben mal wieder an seinen Platz gebracht.

Happy Mapping,

 bielebog

¹ https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131053453