piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
wambacher (2024-01-11 00:58:58+00:00): gerade gesehen. Du hast die Tags am Node gelöscht, da sie schon am buildíng standen.
ob das so ok ist, muß ich morgen mal klären.
VG
wambacher (2024-01-11 00:59:54+00:00): sorry, nicht am building sondern an der site.
wambacher (2024-01-11 13:08:59+00:00): Moin,
ein kleines Problem sehe ich darin, wie man site und building gleichzeitig vernünftig taggt.
Ich hab die etwas unschöne Version gewählt und beide gleich getaggt.
ma-rt-in (2024-01-11 13:11:52+00:00): Ja unglücklich, aber an die site sollte nicht die Adresse und am Building keine site-tags.
ma-rt-in (2024-01-11 13:12:24+00:00): Es kommt sonst zu einer Doppelung in den Daten
wambacher (2024-01-11 14:10:48+00:00): ok, du bist anscheinend näher dran am Thema.
Schmeiss bitte alle Tags raus, die deinem Meinung nach unnötig sind und Ruhe ist ;)
sannkc (2023-08-29 20:15:43+00:00): Where does the cited document state this?  It confirms that there are no existing facilities for biking, but the the physical facilities and access/designation are two separate matters.  You're assuming that because a certain type of biking facility does not exist that this changes access rights/designations.  It doesn't.  

It would be like saying that because a street lacks parking stripes that I should park in someone's private driveway or yard.  The absence of the parking stripes does not mean I should park my car elsewhere.  If it's legal to park on the street, that's where I should park regardless of there being parking stripes or not.

Under Missouri law, streets and roads are by default designated for bike use, regardless of there being any biking facility, unless otherwise indicated. Sidewalks are designated for pedestrians (and bikes, under specific operating conditions), unless otherwise indicated.
mcliquid (2023-09-11 11:56:06+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
bxl-forever (2023-08-29 18:30:06+00:00): Hello,

Please do not forget to write a meaningful changeset title when you upload items to the database.

Do not just type "-" to get rid of the warning.  Your latest edits with no title look suspicious because of that.

Have a nice day!
ivanbranco (2023-08-30 09:15:14+00:00): Qua trovi degli esempi di buoni commenti ai changeset: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments

buon mapping :)
Human1each (2023-08-30 21:42:02+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-05-05.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-29 18:00:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/938350144

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
csimeona22 (2023-08-30 20:08:48+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-03-14.
niwar duski (2023-09-01 10:35:22+00:00): Location my snap 😉
grawal (2023-11-29 16:38:51+00:00): Salve, Il percorso 1017807731, sarebbe da sistemare in quanto si sovrappone ad altri landuse.
DaanLT (2023-08-30 05:32:08+00:00): we have new construction going there, so don't remove/edit without local knowledge, change will be reverted
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-29 18:20:26+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11154241186

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2023-08-29 20:03:34+00:00): Hallo! Bitte schau Dir nochmal https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11154211459 an. Der (zusätzliche) Wert von opening_hours widerspricht sich.
Langlaeufer (2023-08-30 10:55:20+00:00): das sollte Sa heißen, hab es ergänzt
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140554700
Basstoelpel (2023-09-18 21:42:25+00:00): Wäre schön, wenn mich der JOSM validator vor dem Hochladen drauf aufmerksam machen würde und nicht nur die Fehler anmeckern würde, die schon in früher hochgeladenen Daten vorhanden sind.
chris66 (2023-12-08 09:19:29+00:00): Hi,
wieso hast Du hier einige Straßen mit dem Tag "level -1" versehen?

Sind die Straßen unterirdisch?
Hufkratzer (2023-08-29 22:47:59+00:00): Hi,
wenn das ein Reitplatz ist, dann wären die geeigneten Tags: leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian , vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
Wolperting (2023-08-30 06:07:29+00:00): Vielen Dank für deinen Tipp. 
Ich habe es nun geändert. 
Ich fuchse mich seit Jahren Abstinenz wieder ein.
Hufkratzer (2023-08-30 07:34:21+00:00): Ich habe keine Ahnung, was das sein soll, was du da gemappt hast. Auf der Homepage von dem Hof und den Luftbildern ist es leider auch nicht zu erkennen.
Hier ist ein anderer Islandpferdehof, wo ich erkennen kann, was was sein soll:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8581723284
Wolperting (2023-08-30 08:24:13+00:00): Was ich mappen wollte, ist ein kleiner Reitplatz, der vom Pferdehof für den Unterricht genutzt wird. Großes Oval mit kleinem Innenkreis. 
Danke für deinen Link. Das hilft schon mal ordentlich.
Ferrocarriles de México (2023-08-29 18:52:14+00:00): Reverted. Do not change road hierarchy at random.
Ferrocarriles de México (2023-08-29 19:14:36+00:00): Nevermind, it was to match the link roads.
SomeoneElse (2023-12-29 00:03:07+00:00): Hello,
Please don't map things that don't exist like this.  I've deleted them in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145641098 .
Best Regards,
Andy
willkmis (2023-09-25 20:31:47+00:00): Hi,
Out of curiosity, what "local mapping guidelines" are you referring to here that led you to tag this route as trunk? Are they documented anywhere?

For context, consensus has emerged across the US to tag trunk routes by their importance to the road network rather than by physical characteristics, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance. As part of this, I and other mappers developed California state guidelines to adhere to this concept. You can read them here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/California/2022_Highway_Classification_Guidelines. In particular, we documented this particular route as being best-tagged as highway=primary + expressway=yes, to reflect the fact that it does not connect major population centers, but is still built to near-freeway standards that allow for high speeds.

Happy to discuss these guidelines and the thought process behind them, and whether any modifications to various documented practices are necessary.

Best,
Will
Fresno map (2023-09-26 17:29:43+00:00): Hello willkmis,
This is my mistake! I based the Highway=Trunk marking off of the nearby CA 41 which is marked as Highway=Trunk between East Central Avenue and CA 46 even though it does not directly connect Fresno with another significant population center. Having reread the California/2022 Highway Classification Guidelines I now notice that CA 180 is curently NOT proposed to be trunk (I did not see this at the time of the edit). I think at least a portion of this road SHOULD be marked as trunk (Even though it does not directly connect major population centers like the CA 41), it serves as a Other Principal Arterial that connects CA 180 with Fresno in an important spur. As such CA 180 between South De Wolf Avenue and the intersection with North Academy Avenue or that of J31 (South Reed Avenue) should be marked as Trunk.
willkmis (2023-10-10 04:31:32+00:00): Hi, thanks for being open to discussion, and sorry for the delay in replying. I suppose my question would be, who is taking this road in order for it to be considered a trunk route, that is, one of the main routes in the state's road network? What destinations does it serve that merit this importance? If it connects some of the suburbs to central area, I think that's sufficient, but it looks like it just heads into farmland, near towns like Sanger, and eventually the mountains, which seems more like a highway=primary to me. But I assume you're local (given your username ;)), so you might have some insight into local use patterns that I do not. What the guidelines mostly try to steer away from is just tagging a road as highway=trunk because it has a high speed limit or "expressway" features, instead focusing more on its importance to the network.

Also, one of the principles of the classification scheme is to emphasize connectivity and minimize "spurs" where roads of a certain class don't connect at each end with a road of equal or higher class. This isn't always right, since sometimes roads do decrease in importance gradually as you leave an urban area, and I could see CA 180 being one of those exceptions to some extent. It just seems more likely to me (again, from afar) that this cutoff is somewhat west of Reed Ave., since it looks like it is surrounded by farmland, not residents, from the point the freeway ends. Maybe Academy is more reasonable, though I'm still a bit skeptical it has to be trunk at all.

Let me know what you think!

Best,
Will
Fresno map (2023-10-11 03:14:08+00:00): Hello Will,
So, with regards to my local knowledge, this stretch of the CA 180 funnels significant amount of traffic from Fresno towards Sequioa and Kings Canyon National Parks. CA-180's expressway has only recently been extended to bypass the village of Centerville and the hamlet of Minkler in order to prevent traffic from backing up in those localities. The J31 road (South Reed Avenue) does drain a significant amount traffic southward to the City of Reedley. I would prefer that CA-180 be marked as trunk all the way to this junction and at minimum the road should be marked as highway=primary and Expressway=yes not farther west than North Academy Avenue (the major north-south throughfare that  runs between CA-168, CA-180, and Sanger. Let me know what you think!
Sincerely,
Fresnomap
willkmis (2023-10-16 01:39:40+00:00): Hey,
Thanks. I'm still not sure if Reedley or the NPs are significant enough to warrant a trunk connections, since no other towns of 25k population or National Parks in CA are classified as such. If they are, it seems like the trunk classification should extend all the way to the destination, not just dead end where the construction quality decreases, as the goal is to move away from an entirely road construction-based classification. But on the other hand, given that the freeway is a stub anyway, it's not the most egregious outlier in terms of network connectivity anyway, and I am inclined to defer to your local judgment. So if you'd really rather it stay trunk, we can document that as a case for the urban gray area on the wiki.

Best,
Will
Fresno map (2023-10-16 19:33:51+00:00): Hello Will,
I do think the amount of traffic for this segment of the CA-180 means that it should be marked as a trunk. I agree documenting this as an urban grey area would be a good idea. Can you do that?
Sincerely,
Fresno map
willkmis (2023-11-07 06:29:02+00:00): I modified the wiki in this change to reflect this discussion: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=California%2F2022_Highway_Classification_Guidelines&type=revision&diff=2613176&oldid=2501813.

Happy mapping!
Will
Fresno map (2023-11-07 17:07:53+00:00): Thank you Will!
Sincerely,
Fresno map
sannkc (2023-08-29 22:06:14+00:00): Many of the paths that you have retagged in this set are not sidewalks, as defined by OSM.  In OSM, it is customary to distinguish between footways/paths and sidewalks based on their relationship to roads.  Sidewalks, as the name implies, run alongside roadways, so the footway=sidewalk tag is not really appropriate for footways that cut through college campuses, parks, etc.  

For further guidance: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:footway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks

Also, you can use the OpenStreet Browser (https://openstreetbrowser.org/) to confirm that other mappers (not just me) follow this practice.  You can view the OSM footway data by selecting Transportation > Walking > Footways.  In well-mapped cities, like San Francisco, London, Berlin, and Toronto, there's a fairly consistent tagging distinction between sidewalks alongside roads and footways elsewhere.
eggie (2023-08-29 19:42:51+00:00): Dag Menno..
Wanneer de paden afgesloten zijn dan heb je het correct gedaan.
Paden die aan het dichtgroeien zijn kun je taggen als disused:highway=path ... dit voorkomt opnieuw intekenen.
Niet meer herkenbaar dan gewoon verwijderen.
Groet..
eggie
Frans S (2023-08-30 09:42:46+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
 Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key. You hardly squared buildings.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140555714
Duracellpt (2023-09-01 08:18:34+00:00): Olá Waldyrious! Obrigado pelas tuas contribuições.
Podes verificar a alteração de maxheight das seguintes vias?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226990072
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413489626
Provavelmente é um erro de escrita.
Obrigado.
Cumprimentos.
waldyrious (2023-10-14 21:25:57+00:00): Obrigado pela observação! Trata-se de um erro na inserção dos dados devido a um bug no StreetComplete (https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/5232). Corrigi agora, no changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142592971
ftrebien (2025-03-07 16:29:32+00:00): Há placas no local indicando que o limite de velocidade nas marginais é de 60km/h, não 80km/h.
nurdafur (2023-09-15 20:47:14+00:00): Hallo Betafranz

Du hast in diesem Changeset eine neue Relation fürs den WasserWelten Steig angelegt. Diese scheint fast vollständig zu sein. Jedoch gibt es nun 2 Relationen für diese Wanderung. Ideal wäre wohl, wenn die Route komplett In der Relation dargestellt wird, die es schon seit mehr als 2 Jahren gibt.

Liebe Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Kartografieren 
Urs
Harvesterify (2023-12-02 00:01:39+00:00): Hi, can you explain why you removed the path ? Have you been on site to check if it was indeed existing ? Because I did, it is a path under construction for bikes and pedestrian, that you can also view on Street View or Bing Streetside, so I'm reverting your changes, thank you
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-20 12:25:58+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11154347326/history has 1=1 key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
MosBike (2024-09-30 19:56:41+00:00): Здравствуйте! Возможно, опечатка или ошибка. Было довольно сложно позиционировать в лесу такое количество трасс, но вроде удалось
map per (2023-09-02 13:14:18+00:00): This edit looks good as well, thanks!
VlIvYur (2023-08-31 05:50:23+00:00): Hello
Your test has failed. Don't map what is already mapped. And what you are looking for is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
HellMap (2023-08-29 19:30:59+00:00): Hello,

Unfortunately, this was not a valid fix for this detected issue. You cannot simply "extract" a part of the building to a different layer to avoid the error report. There isn't great Mapillary footage available here, but you can see this is a building passage through the same building https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=108548951312564&focus=photo And if you enable the cadaster layer, you can see it's the same building. These are extremely common in Latvia.

Please take care not to guess at the solution if you aren't sure and instead skip it or mark it as "too hard" in MapRoulette. A local may be able to fix it.

Thanks
wvdp (2023-08-29 21:13:21+00:00): I made an attempt to fix this issue.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140560080

Now that this has been pointed out to me, it feels like a lazy "fix" for the solution.

I hope that the current situation is more to your liking.
HellMap (2023-08-29 21:27:33+00:00): Looks good, thanks!
MxxCon (2023-08-30 04:56:18+00:00): If you want features to have proper navigation, way-finding and guidance, in addition to connecting way to the edge of areas, ways should also connect to other ways. Presently routers don't have good support for navigating through pedestrian areas, so ways should still be drawn.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140556901
map per (2023-09-02 13:14:06+00:00): This edit looks good as well, thanks!
silversurfer83 (2023-08-30 07:11:13+00:00): Moin :)

die Kapazität könnte schon passen. Für Einzelplätze haben wir aber folgende Möglichkeit, die die Sache besser darstellt:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140557581
silversurfer83 (2023-08-30 07:08:56+00:00): Moin :)

der Abschnitt war schon vor deiner Bearbeitung für KFZ gesperrt durch die Eigenschaft "motor_vehicle=no". Alle Eigenschaften eines Objekts siehst du, wenn du es anwählst und dann in der Spalte links weit nach unten scrollst bis du zum Abschnitt "Eigenschaften" kommst. Dort ist dann eine Tabelle oder ein Textfeld zu sehen.
Mach aus dem Abschnitt hier ruhig wieder einen "highway=residential", denke das war schon korrekt.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140557622
Holferum (2023-08-30 14:38:36+00:00): Erledigt, danke
MxxCon (2023-08-30 05:07:05+00:00): Hello.
Please note that there are a couple of data quality issues with this edit.
As documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage, phone numbers MUST be prefixed by the country dialing code (in US it's +1) and separated either by space or -.

Additionally, as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website website address MUST have either http:// or https:// prefix.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140557780
MxxCon (2023-08-30 05:02:58+00:00): Hello.
Please note that this edit is incorrect.
A building should be tagged as a specific business ONLY if that's the only business in that building. If there are multiple businesses, each one should be tagged as a separate node. In this case CVS isn't the only biz here. There are other retail locations and office space on 2nd floor.
As such this edit will be reverted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140557815
map per (2023-09-02 13:13:46+00:00): Hello erdwich,

thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMaps!

As you asked for a review: This edit looks good, thanks!

Best regards
map per
MxxCon (2023-08-30 05:09:29+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you tag this crosswalk as uncontrolled when there's clearly a traffic light here?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140557921
damianeue (2023-08-29 19:59:53+00:00): In Foro viaduct, as for Alento viaduct in a previous changeset, in this edit only the start and end nodes (for each way) are aligned, the rest of the nodes will be aligned in my future changeset
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-09-02 23:27:56+00:00): Reviewed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140558055
txemt (2023-10-11 22:11:42+00:00): You added a speed limit of 80mph on an exit ramp in Junction, Texas. I know Texas is very liberal with its speeds, but I didn't think the legal speed limit was 80mph on the exit ramps.

Was there some sort of change to the law that I'm not aware of?
Vas111 (2023-10-12 22:40:01+00:00): Hello,
Since the speed limit of the road the exit ramp leaves is 80 mph, the speed limit of the ramp is also 80 mph unless there's a different white 'speed limit' sign before it. Obviously no one will ever go 80 mph on a ramp but nominally that's the speed limit because it hasn't yet changed. I would've added a 'yellow' advisory limit but this junction doesn't have any.
Vas111 (2023-10-12 22:41:30+00:00): Basically what I'm getting at is that there has to be some kind of speed limit on the ramp and the only logical one to me is 80 mph based on my thinking in the previous message.
txemt (2023-10-13 00:19:45+00:00): I've never heard of that logic and I've only seen a few ramps which match the same speed of the highway with which one is exiting. 

With that being said, I do give you this http://onlinemanuals.txdot.gov/TxDOTOnlineManuals/TxDOTManuals/rdw/ramps_and_direct_connections.htm as law when it comes to editing in Texas in regards to exit/entrance ramps.
bagis (2024-07-29 20:18:02+00:00): Hello!
This change seems a bit odd. You have added two companies to address nodes. Normally you will add this as a shop or amenity. I could not find a sign at these residential buildings, but I did find the websites for these companies so I guess they are run from someones home.
I think something needs to change to improve the data so I ask what your motivation for this change was?
For your information, the initial question was started in  https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4281374
Best regards,
bagis
silversurfer83 (2023-08-30 06:51:57+00:00): Moin Anton :)

willkommen bei OSM. Schön, dass du mithilfst.

Hier ein kleiner Hinweis bzgl. Namen bei OSM:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen

Kontrollier diesen "Wintergarten" bitte noch einmal im mit Blick auf diesen Artikel. Danke.

Bei Fragen, immer raus damit

grüße
silversurfer83
silversurfer83 (2023-09-26 06:59:33+00:00): Hallo nochmal,

ich hoffe, dass diese Kommentare, von denen du mittlerweile mehrere für verschiedene Änderungen bekommen hast, auch bei dir ankommen. Sie sind nämlich die primäre Möglichkeit sich über Änderungen an der Karte auszutauschen, was bei tausenden Beitragenden und millionen Nutzern auch sehr wichtig ist. Daher wäre es schön, wenn du auf die Kommentare, die du bekommst, auch reagierst. In der Regel sind es nämlich freundliche Hilfsangebote oder Hinweise, was du noch besser machen kannst.

Den Wintergarten hab ich jetzt mangels Reaktion deinerseits erstmal selbst geändert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141759373

Grüße
silversurfer83
simulator1 (2023-08-30 17:40:02+00:00): dobro uočeno, ne znam kako su se izbrisale. Bio je konflikt prilikom uploada.
eggie (2023-08-30 05:24:23+00:00): Hi OSmapper

Please don't add bicycle=designated to cycleways in the Netherlands.
That's not an issue.
Please remove..
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140558583

Greetz,
eggie
OStreetMapper (2023-08-30 05:31:22+00:00): Hmmm...
Thanks for telling me...
But now, can you give me a tip on how to go back and change them?
eggie (2023-08-30 05:39:10+00:00): In the overpass you will find your edits..
Just click on those cycleways .. then find your cycleway in the editor you use and simply skip bicycle=designated. 

All buildings are import from the Dutch Kadaster and are mostly okay.

A revert is also possible with the Plugin reverter from editor JOSM.

Greetz
eggie