piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
buy_osmand (2025-09-04 05:52:08+00:00): ٱلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ,
as-salāmu ʿalaykum,

Greetings from me to you, your good intentions have led you here 😊. You have requested for review and here is my brief take of it. relation/9569901 is common to be recommended for Tourism.. it has touchups on it's sides but it's mostly a natural formation, please do take this local opinion of mine with grace and make the appropriate reverts as deemed necessary 😉

 AlhamdullilahirRabil'aalaameen❗❕
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171427451
B252697 (2025-09-08 13:06:23+00:00): Dear junior20,

Could you share the reasons for doing this changeset?

I find that this changeset is inaccurate and doesn't reflect reality.

1) Hong Lim Park has been tagged as forest. Although Hong Lim Park has some trees and covers, it is not a forest. It is more a park which has events every now and then.
2) The Singapore River has been added with park features which extend on both sides of the river. I just walked Singapore River earlier this evening. First, some parts of the Singapore River do have parks on both sides, but not all parts. Second, the proportion is way off. In reality, the river is much wider than the parks, not the other way around. I don't think it's right to make the parks dominate the Singapore river, while the Singapore river then becomes very thin on the map.

Please share your reasons, or revert these edits. Thank you!
alexswilliams (2025-09-03 23:30:15+00:00): Changeset description: Separating houses in Hockerley into terraces/semis.

(Apologies, fumbled adding the description in the upload dialogue, I accidentally mangled the surrounding residential landuse early in the edit session without noticing, so carefully uploaded changes from a few selections... was focused on that so forgot to add a description.)
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-03 23:31:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"księdza Bernarda Jarzębskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13117142580

"majora Walerego Remiszewskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13117142582
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13117142583
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13117142584

"majora Adolfa Pilcha Doliny":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1297372587

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
syntex (2025-09-04 00:48:42+00:00): Poprawione
mkopinsky (2025-09-18 05:11:02+00:00): This changeset changes Cynwyd Line back to Ivy Ridge Line, even though the Ivy Ridge name hasn't been used for decades. It also changes it from usage=branch to usage=main or usage=industrial, neither of which are correct (at least based on how the OSM wiki describes those three tag values).

What is owner=New York-Pittsburgh Subway Track? Is that an ownership that still exists?
RailandSea (2025-09-18 05:25:12+00:00): In the Septa Timetable it’s designated as the Ivy Ridge Line. Updated main trackage based on passenger trains as it has numerous trains a day. Based on the timetable instructions after CP signal it becomes an industrial/running track to the end of the track, with degraded PTC.   As a far as the NYPS track that’s what Amtrak calls it. Its a main line connection track between PH and NYP lines It’s all timetable designated information in the NEC timetable.  There’s a few railroads that have 2 times for the line the service name and the line/subdivision name. Just going with the official railroad line name.
mkopinsky (2025-09-18 05:26:07+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172094035
mkopinsky (2025-09-18 05:33:41+00:00): I think what matters for OSM isn't what the railroad designates it, it's what the reality on the ground is. A tiny commuter line that sees a train 5 times a day isn't a main line. (The portions tagged name="Ivy Ridge Line" or now name="Cynwyd Line" do not see numerous trains a day, unless by numerous you mean 5.) A line that hasn't gone to Ivy Ridge since 1986 isn't the Ivy Ridge Line.

I agree that the tail end of the Cynwyd Line (basically after Cynwyd station) is a running line, and I don't object to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/756330656 being tagged railway:track_ref="Running Track". But I don't think it all matches the description on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:usage=industrial?uselang=en of "railway tracks in private use that serve only freight transport from/to ports, industrial complexes or mining areas, and for connecting these to the public network."
RailandSea (2025-09-18 05:41:19+00:00): Fair enough, there’s a lot things that doesn’t always make sense I was just updating the rail lines with the most accurate up to date information out of the books. The railroads like to rename stuff all the time. I suppose the other option to the industrial/running track would leave it straight yard track but just following the pattern the name to service type on the tag.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-09-17 22:19:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 172087218 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism in Cairo.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18743
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-09-17 22:19:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 172087218 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism in Cairo.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18743
aTarom (2025-09-04 08:10:34+00:00): Fixing, fixing what? Are you from the area? Are you sure you're fixing roundabouts?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction=roundabout?uselang=en
ZLima12 (2025-10-11 01:44:55+00:00): Hi,

Could you confirm where you got the shape for the park from? It looks like it came from the county tax parcels, which is an acceptable source, but I just want to confirm before adding it to the source tag.
s777n (2025-09-04 07:43:32+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы продублировали башню Башня здесь уже есть https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/504609474 Удалил.
buy_osmand (2025-09-04 03:36:09+00:00): To good mapper Tristan Partin,  
Your good works current & future, without monetary compensation is highly recognized.

This edit so GOOD 😳👍
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171429636
s777n (2025-09-04 07:54:41+00:00): Здравствуйте. Удалил вашу правку. В OpenStreetmap существует свой формат адресов. Например  дом 48 корпус 2 нужно добавить как 48 к2 вне зависимости от того как оно записано в других местах. Как правильно сокращать вы можете посмотреть здесь: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Адреса#Нумерация_домов Обратите внимание что буква в номере дома и литера это разные вещи и записываются по-разному.
McBeeFace4935 (2025-09-04 07:03:31+00:00): uh oh
McBeeFace4935 (2025-09-04 07:03:41+00:00): help how to delete
❤️‍🔥 (2025-09-04 10:03:05+00:00): fixed. if you're the same prankster who's opening the inappropriate notes, please don't...

there are more valuable ways to contribute, such as mapping buildings at your local high school, which will appear in snapmaps after a few months
buy_osmand (2025-09-04 08:53:23+00:00): ٱلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ,
as-salāmu ʿalaykum,

I, buy_osmand, Living man walking on the island known in the Book of Nations as, the `Republik of Singapura` hereby affirms the great value of the ground_survey `check_dates` by good mapper, [[ Nysh! ]].

Your good works current & future, without monetary compensation is highly recognized.

 AlhamdullilahirRabil'aalaameen❗❕
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171432015
022 (2025-09-04 03:43:07+00:00): L'importation des nouvelles frontières municipales NB (dès 2023) est maintenant fini à 86%

La comission des services régionaux de sud-est (près de Moncton) est la seule région qui reste à faire.

-

The import of new NB municipal boundaries (from 2023) is now 86% complete

The southeast regional service comission is the only region left to do (Moncton area).
user_5359 (2025-09-05 12:22:44+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1427024687, http://www.osm.org/way/1427023952. what is the mean of the tag 9 = 9/4/2025?
Vinber-Pro (2025-10-22 13:51:28+00:00): Bonjour,
sais-tu à quoi correspondent exactement ces lieux ? car cela me semble surprenant que cela soit des refuges https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:tourism=wilderness%20hut?uselang=fr

On peut y passer la nuit ?

à plus
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-24 00:24:12+00:00): DWG revert - fictitious mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175046935
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-24 00:26:26+00:00): DWG reference 2025112410000011 — user / rooffeel
fortera_au (2025-09-07 00:33:13+00:00): Hi, I removed this note (and all others matching the original note) as the closures are on and off as needed, meaning the note isn't quite accurate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171432803
Caleb NHVR (2025-09-11 22:48:02+00:00): Thanks fortera, the note did cause some confusion when looking at vehicle access along Majors Road.
Cheers,
Caleb
kuhni74 (2025-09-04 06:31:47+00:00): danke!
eggie (2025-09-04 05:45:25+00:00): Dag Jan.. maak gebruik van de bestaande adresnode.
In OSM zit er geen spatie in postcodes.
Mvg..
eggie
WBSKI (2026-01-18 20:46:23+00:00): Hi StantonPfarri25, thanks for adding a lot of winter routes in the Lechtal :)

I noticed there are many duplicate ways created for winter hiking routes. For example:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1427032371/. On the ground, its not a separated hiking path but a mixed use trail (nordic / hiking).

Given that, it would be better to add winter hiking to the existing way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/72876063/) rather than adding a duplicate way. This can be done by changing piste:type to "nordic;hike" as an example.

There's also some more info about the principle here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
Jarek 🚲 (2025-11-01 14:26:41+00:00): Hello,

Your edits have introduced a sidewalk discontinuity at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13118744827, right outside Dixie station. Can you please resolve this?
PedestrianMapping_MapShadow (2025-11-04 08:31:46+00:00): Hi Jarek, I have added the missing sidewalks on this section. On the opposite side, there is already a pre-existing footway. The sidewalk ends at the node you mentioned, and the remaining portion appears to be a footway. It seems that the footway has now been properly extended, and the data looks fine.
 
Thank you for your feedback; I will make sure to keep this in mind for future edits.
Bobbi123 (2025-09-04 11:14:53+00:00): Bitte zu jeder Änderung eine kleinen Kommentar angeben, damit man ungefähr weiß, was gemacht wurde. Und bitte auch nicht derart auseinanderliegende Änderungen vornehmen sondern regional trennen.
-karlos- (2025-09-04 09:57:49+00:00): Big brother is watching you
in OSMgo ;-)
zyxzyx (2025-09-04 06:33:07+00:00): I reverted this changeset because it bended roads improperly.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171435888
ieguy3 (2025-09-04 06:10:50+00:00): if you look through the window. it says its their fontana office.
infeeeee (2025-09-08 10:47:13+00:00): Leírásodnak megfelelően volt jelölve minden, módosítascsomag visszavonva.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171627622
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-09-04 06:37:09+00:00): Hello, please do not use abbreviations in names. Also, please don't put "BLDG#" in the name. I suggest using the tags building=apartments, operator=Mountain GateTrails Apartments, and either ref=(building number) or addr:unit=(building number). Thank you.
jbcharron (2025-10-11 14:12:56+00:00): Attention a la typo de l'exploitant "Enedis" :)
Wouter Bossuyt (2025-09-04 07:18:38+00:00): The last climb from val dáran to Bretxa de Peyta is not walkable and very dangarous to climb due to rockfall and lose stones. Indications on the ground have also been removed by the path maintenance to prevent people from wandering up there
eggie (2025-09-04 07:54:29+00:00): Dag KrabbeJ,
Je kunt het beste een vlakje er omheen trekken met amenity=charging_station .
charging_point doet niets in rendering in OSM.
MVG
eggie
marc__marc (2025-11-07 12:28:46+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13118859901
access=permit signifie que vous pouvez demander un permis en remplissant un formulaire et payant les frais tel qu'un permis de pèche  :)
pour un accès public, c'est access=yes
pour un objet privé mais pour lequel le propriétaire tolère/authorise l'accès, c'est access=permissive
Cordialement,
Marc
YomanNH (2025-09-04 07:47:17+00:00): Hej, każda zmiana to "aktualizacja". Stosuj bardziej konkretne opisy swoich aktualizacji.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
eserte (2025-09-05 20:06:30+00:00): Hi!

access=ja bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367813140 ist vermutlich nicht richtig. (Habe nicht bei anderen Änderungen im Changeset nachgeschaut)

-- Slaven
AntV (2025-09-04 07:46:17+00:00): I meant Calstock and not Saltash!
user_5359 (2025-09-06 05:54:43+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1198062134. what is the mean of the tag Maxx = yes?
uᴉʍOꓨ (2025-09-07 03:16:28+00:00): Hi @ user_5359 .  Thank you for catching that oversight. It's been fixed.
mavl (2025-09-05 13:19:43+00:00): Здравствуйте. "Улица Героя Попова" указывается в OpenStreetMap как "улица Героя Попова".  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
Le Petit Léo (2025-09-11 23:57:29+00:00): Bonjour dusaujot89,
J'ai vu que vous avez corrigé les routes sur la futur route LISA comme je vous l'avez suggéré en ajoutant le bon tag. C'est très bien.
Mais vous avez coupé les routes existantes dans les futurs rond-points !! Il ne faut surtout pas !
Vous devez au contraire laisser le tracé de la route comme il est actuellement (tracé qui traverse le futur rond-point) sinon la route sera considérée comme une impasse par les routeurs !
Merci de remettre les tracés au plus vite.
Comme je vous l'ai suggéré, évitez de faire des modifications sur du futur qui n’existe pas encore, cela demande une bonne connaissance et peu être très vite source de problèmes.
Cartographiez plutôt l'existant, il y a largement de quoi s'occuper.
Bonne cartographie et bonne journée
Le Petit Léo (2025-09-16 13:03:39+00:00): Bonjour dussaujot89,
Ce message pour vous informer que J'ai rétabli les routes que vous aviez supprimées ainsi que les relations associées.
Si vous avez des doutes quand vous réalisez des modifications, cochez la case "je souhaite que quelqu'un vérifie".
OSM est une communauté de bénévoles qui ont à coeur de participer au commun, vous pouvez vous appuyer dessus si besoin.
Bonne journée
NeisBot (2025-09-04 08:16:35+00:00): Hi DocHoot, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 80% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 2 building(s)
- 1 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=171439658
DocHoot (2025-09-04 08:22:05+00:00): Huge zone was marked as "agricultural use" compared to previous map standard where much smaller grid sections where designed for agricultural use. This large section required huge amounts of modification to make it correctly fit in the correct areas to avoid overlaps in the nearby urban area/etc. In the end it is easier to delete it and correctly assign new agricultural zones instead of moving every side of it. Regarding the buildings deleted, these often had incorrect dimensions or locations: it's easier to redo them.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-04 08:21:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, usuń addr:place i zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, pozostaw tylko addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13112220973

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WillySleep (2025-09-05 10:25:00+00:00): Separate changes, please
KPOYT (2025-10-15 18:01:00+00:00): What was the reason to change addresses from correct to incorrect for Dedeman, Evolution Apartments blocks and Avangarden blocks?

Here is for example the Dedeman's address: Bulevardul Mihai Viteazul nr 4, Șelimbăr 557260

These buildings are parts of city Șelimbar, județul Sibiu. But not city Sibiu.
rarad74 (2025-10-15 19:45:04+00:00): Hello. Probably by mistake and not intentionally. I thought that was the administrative area of ​​Sibiu.
蕉饼电脑 (2025-09-11 07:13:59+00:00): 此变更集与前一变更集 (171389922) 因故不包含任何修改，且默认不可见。
☭烈焰狂狮☭ (2025-09-23 14:53:44+00:00): 你可能不知道——台湾岛上的当地政府属于一种旧中国政府，它们并不只包含“台湾岛”，你不能因为旧政府控制的领土只剩下台湾岛而认为剩下的领地都是台湾的，它们还拥有福建、海南和广东的部分领土，其中广东领土就是这个东沙岛
蕉饼电脑 (2025-09-23 19:39:26+00:00): 作为地图编辑者，我自然有足够的地理知识储备以了解到东沙群岛在中国大陆为广东省汕尾市下辖单位这一行政区域划分。但OpenStreetMap以事实上的管辖状态即实际控制为准。东沙群岛事实上为台北政权管辖范围，依据“两岸互不承认主权，互不否认治权”这一原则，这一事实的陈述不是不能承认的。因此东沙群岛被台北政权划入高雄市行政范围且由高雄市实际管辖这一事实在OpenStreetMap中更具有参考价值。
WillySleep (2025-09-05 10:24:49+00:00): Separate changes, please
L'imaginaire (2025-09-05 17:45:55+00:00): 👍
❤️‍🔥 (2025-09-04 10:13:25+00:00): Hi, this is clearly not a road, it's a grass driveway on private land. 

Could you please ask your team to use 'Driveway' instead of 'Residential Road'?
Mintusha98 (2025-09-04 11:57:23+00:00):  Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have reverted the edit . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-20 06:25:47+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13118989771/history has shop = concept_store that was added in this edit
shop=concept_store ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
WillySleep (2025-09-05 10:24:15+00:00): Separate changes, please
kate_rocketdata (2025-09-05 11:05:52+00:00): Hello! Thank you for your comment! Could you please clarify what you mean? How can we assist you?
WillySleep (2025-09-05 11:38:28+00:00): Hello! What I mean is that it's better to separate your changes into smaller, more specific edits. For example, if you make many changes across different cities or regions, it can be confusing when looking at the history for a specific area like Omsk. Changes from all over Russia might show up in the history, even if they are not related to that particular area. It’s easier to track and review if each edit is focused on a specific location. This way, the history stays clear and organized. Hope that makes sense!
Alliegaytor (2025-09-04 09:42:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1427059666 looks more like a driveway than a residential road
Mintusha98 (2025-09-04 12:01:10+00:00): Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have reverted the edit . I look forward to your Suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you.
Alliegaytor (2025-09-04 09:40:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1427061354 looks more like a driveway than a residential road
Mintusha98 (2025-09-04 12:04:30+00:00): Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have reverted the edit . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you.
GrabMY_ainayusof (2026-03-16 01:58:37+00:00): Hello. 

I saw your recent edit where the barrier was added to the junction instead of the blocked way ID.

Due to its placement at a junction, it has blocked navigation to other areas, resulting in incorrect routing. 

The next time, do put barrier on the way ID itself and not junction. 

Thanks
bergfrei (2025-09-05 18:26:35+00:00): Hallo Simonx,
du hast die Wege und den Gipfelaufbau im Bereich Grünten nach dem Luftbild von Bing verschoben. Die Bing-Luftbilder haben hier jedoch eine Abweichung von etwa 30 Metern. Wenn du mit JOSM arbeitest, kannst du dir die hochgeladenen GPX-Aufzeichnungen ansehen. Dabei wird deutlich, dass deine Änderungen eine „Verschlimmbesserung” sind. Besser sind in diesem Bereich die ESRI-Bilder. Bitte prüfe und mache die Änderung rückgängig. Im Zweifel kannst du auch den gesamten Change-Set in JOSM rückgängig machen und den Ausgangszustand wiederherstellen. Prinzipiell ist eine Überarbeitung nur nach Luftbild und ohne GPX-Abgleich nicht empfehlenswert. Falls du dich nicht mit dem Zurücksetzen des change-set  nicht auskennst, gib bitte Bescheid. Je früher man hier die Änderung zurücksetzt desto weniger Komplikationen gibt es. Bitte um baldige Rückmeldung. Danke!
Gruß Bergfrei
bergfrei (2025-09-12 14:35:25+00:00): Hallo Simonxl,
deine Änderungen im Gipfelbereich wurde von mir rückgängig gemacht. Bitte aber meinen Hinweis bzgl. Luftbilder zukünftig beachten.
Gruß Bergfrei
ralley (2025-09-05 00:50:22+00:00): These are not residential roads - they are driveways
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171442530
Nakaner-repair (2025-09-04 09:32:29+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 171364647, 171398354, 171398537, 171398943.
ralley (2025-09-05 00:50:03+00:00): These are not residential roads - they are driveways
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171442885
limes11 (2025-09-22 10:38:02+00:00): Hallo, 

Bitte schau mal hier

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4974225

Das passt so nicht mehr, entweder zwei ways oder kein oneway=yes. 

Grüße
FabiStrassenbahn (2025-09-22 13:31:59+00:00): Ja, schade, da bin ich bei dir. Im Endzustand sind es zwei Ways, links und rechts der Gleise. 
Vielleicht wäre es besser gewesen, meine Straße, die nach Norden führt als "im Bau" zu deklarieren.
So wie es jetzt dargestellt ist, wird es ja nach der Freigabe der Kreuzung für den Verkehr nicht mehr aussehen.
pascalweiterdingen (2025-09-04 20:33:34+00:00): Was genau ist der Grund, Steingötter-Greiff-Str. 7 wieder in ein Appartment-Gebäude zu ändern?
Das ist aktuell die linke Hälfte einer Doppelhaushälfte und für die rechte Hälfte haben die Bauarbeiten gerade begonnen. Bin letzte Woche noch dran vorbei gelaufen...
wies1 (2025-09-05 05:58:46+00:00): Hallo,
Ok, habs gerade entsprechend korrigiert.
Gruss
wies1
AntMadeira (2025-09-04 11:56:13+00:00): Olá novamente ;)
Tenho visto que tens atualizado muitas passadeiras na Marinha Grande.
Seria útil que em vez de usares apenas o valor crossing:markings=yes definisses qual o valor específico, como por exemplo "zebra".
No editor iD, podes abrir o menu onde escolhes o "yes" e definir melhor que tipo de marcas têm as passadeiras. Acho que seria uma boa adenda ao imenso trabalho que tens feito nessa área.

Qualquer dúvida, é só dizeres.

Cumprimentos,
António.
Living_man Singapura (2025-09-04 10:07:35+00:00): ٱلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ,
as-salāmu ʿalaykum DerFussi,

please do share some resources on how one begins their own Wikivoyage❓Thank you for your routine edit in providing more detail for the benefit of folks walking this island 💕
martien-176 (2025-09-04 10:27:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1427066357
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1427066358

Hi Manjita, these 2 features have shadows inside the polygon. That means they are actually walls surroundings yards. The real buildings are the smaller structures inside the polygon.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171444166