piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CoyKoi (2025-04-22 23:23:02+00:00): Hey computerOwl, please can you double-check your aerial imagery sources. The LINZ aerial layer was recently updated with 2024 dated imagery, so is more up to date than the other sources mentioned.

LINZ aerials can be dated using the LINZ basemaps viewer - check the attribution at the bottom of the map: https://basemaps.linz.govt.nz/@-37.0355444,174.9264934,z17.22?i=auckland-2024-0.075m&labels=true
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165307313
user_21880486 (2025-04-22 23:35:11+00:00): Hi,

If you go into Ersi wayback which is where I found the outdated buildings, you'll see it's also dated. It was dated 2025.
CoyKoi (2025-04-22 23:53:09+00:00): Hi computerOwl,

In Esri's Wayback imagery service the date in the side panel is the date of the imagery release. When you click on the map, the popup indicates the actual date of imagery capture (April 8 2023 - for the townhouses corner of Camberley Court and Lincoln Rd)
b-jazz (2025-04-23 15:31:06+00:00): Hello golf course mapper. The lines that define Fairways and Greens should never intersect or partially overlap each other and we noticed that they are overlapping in one or more of the fairway/green pairs in this changeset. If there is no obvious fringe around the green, the fairway should butt up against the green and every node between them should be *shared*. If there is a fringe around the green that is similar to the fairway, the fairway should extend around the green and the two objects should be merged together into a multipolygon (See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon for how to create them with your map editor).  Please read the wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions, please reply here and I'll gladly help clarify things. Thanks!
user_21880486 (2025-04-22 23:24:10+00:00): Copy pasted the wrong thing, was meant to say:

Added buildings assisted with the New Zealand buildings dataset, each building checked manually.
fortera_au (2025-04-22 23:51:51+00:00): Hi, this line isn't a road, it's part of an administrative boundary border. I've removed the tags from it, you'll want to add those tags to the ways for the roads themselves.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165307626
SomeoneElse (2025-04-23 11:16:19+00:00): Thanks!
b-jazz (2025-04-23 16:10:47+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1380126635

Hello Kelvin,
The lines that define fairways, greens, bunkers, water hazards, and tees should never intersect or partially overlap each other and we noticed that they are overlapping in one or more of the feature pairs in this changeset. If there is no obvious fringe around the green, the fairway should butt up against the green and every node between them should be *shared*. If there is a fringe around the green that is similar to the fairway, the fairway should extend around the green and the two objects should be merged together into a multipolygon (See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon for how to create them with your map editor).  Please read the wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions, please reply here and I'll gladly help clarify things. Thanks!
user_5359 (2025-04-23 10:46:28+00:00): Hello! What is the mean of the tag sharko = yes?
user_18023081 (2025-04-23 22:51:06+00:00): @user_5359 yet again: an internal tag (to mark my "new" buildings when importing)
user_5359 (2025-04-24 09:32:33+00:00): My recommendation would be that you use a standard key such as fixme or note instead of your own key and transfer your abbreviation to the value.
user_18023081 (2025-04-24 10:31:57+00:00): YOUR recommendation - check this out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like
user_5359 (2025-04-23 10:18:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use the tag "building" = "yes" (not "building=yes" = "yes". And there is no necessary to add a name (tag "name"="Building")
Yoga Perdana Putra (2025-04-23 01:10:26+00:00): Edit: Sorry for mistaken name. it's not from Banyudono, but from Bokoharjo.
mweper (2025-04-23 11:45:32+00:00): Hola José Luis. Vi que has borrado las interpretaciones de altura al realizar ediciones. ¿Existe algún motivo para esta eliminación?
Las interpretaciones de altura son muy importantes para la navegación y el poder encontrar números de direcciones de casas, por lo que se deberían borrar.
Por favor revisa esto. Gracias y buen mapeo.
rskedgell (2025-04-23 04:44:09+00:00): What's the point of adding crossing:markings=yes, other than "the iD told you it was a good idea"? If you can see what the markings are, please tag appropriately. Telling data consumers that "this marked crossing is marked" isn't particularly useful.
rskedgell (2025-04-23 04:48:50+00:00): I also see that you've added operator:type=private to Great Ormond Street Hospital. Was the error here yours, or a defective suggestion by the iD editor?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/548533106
rskedgell (2025-04-23 05:11:23+00:00): I've raised an issue for iD making the suggestion to "upgrade" Great Ormond Street Hospital by adding operator:type=private. However, a poor suggestion from a QA tool is not an excuse to add information which is obviously wrong.

https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/issues/1528
DaveF (2025-05-05 23:08:43+00:00): Station No. 4 error:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/3663368460
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-05-22 08:56:57+00:00): This changeset added an only_left_turn restriction.
tastrax (2025-04-23 04:53:59+00:00): Hi there HJ23 - if you turn on GPS traces in ID editor you will see there are a couple in the vicinity that can help with alignment of the track
tastrax (2025-04-23 04:54:15+00:00): PS - welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Rollsouth (2025-05-02 06:26:53+00:00): I've deleted this feature and extended the existing Noahs Track feature to match survey data recorded on site. Name has been updated to Knocksofty Track, which is the formal name. Cheers.
aixbrick (2025-04-23 08:20:23+00:00): Hello,
"bus:backward" and "bus:forward" are unnecessary. There is already "bus=yes" tagged. If the router does not understand that, adjust it to do so, instead of changing OSM data.
Regards
Mashin (2025-04-23 08:30:32+00:00): Hi,
I know what you mean, but as far as I know the general agreement is that these segments are necessary for waterway network connectivity. Sometimes the can be tagged as waterway=flowline
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dflowline
Kinsio (2025-04-25 16:32:36+00:00): I just noticed some of your zip_left and zip_right tags differed from the tiger:zip_left and tiger:zip_right tags. What was your data source for this information?
txemt (2025-04-25 18:19:40+00:00): Please, reach out to me on slack.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2025-04-25 10:42:46+00:00): voce desenhou vias aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12777617185 mas estão fora do lugar. porque não usou uma camada mais apropriada como a ESRI onde da pra ver claramente estas vias?
Udarian (2025-04-24 02:14:40+00:00): why did you move the address https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6057551973 to the middle of the road, and the name you added to the building, what type of business is it. 
Further reviewing the streetside imagery around the building there seems to be multiple businesses in  that building so are you sure that that is the name of the building as it may just be one business within it, aka what is your source for this commit.
HAALAND_ (2026-02-25 02:47:58+00:00): 请不要在name标签里添加非当地语言!
Пожалуйста, не добавляйте в именную табличку надписи на языках, отличных от местного!
Natas74D7 (2025-04-23 05:11:03+00:00): I have a feeling maybe I'm doing too much, especially with the number of nodes I'm putting down. But, everything from the very bottom of Fryelands Elementary School to the North of Tye Lake Trail as been altered in some kind of way. Everything is preserved however, all the original work is there. I just added a ridiculous amount of detail to the point where I'm questioning if "too" much.
fortera_au (2025-04-23 06:38:40+00:00): Should way/32805950 and way/998301746 be highway=trunk? I would have thought it would be secondary since both Gladstone Road and Jones Road are highway=secondary.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165313043
Supt_of_Printing (2025-04-23 09:48:16+00:00): That's not how I see it. As the crossover between the two directions of the Princes Highway is neither Gladstone Road nor Jones Road, it is simply a crossover of the Princes Highway, which is a Trunk Road. If there is a crossover between the two directions of a divided road where there are no intersecting roads, the crossover is considered a part of the divided road as it is within the two lanes.
Supt_of_Printing (2025-04-23 09:52:06+00:00): Just an added comment, if Jones Road were a tertiary road, with Gladstone Road being a secondary road, what class of road should be used for the crossover?
fortera_au (2025-04-23 10:05:11+00:00): It's not suddenly a significantly more capable road for that small crossover, it's not part of the Princes Highway, and shoudn't be tagged based off of it. 

For naming it, you can just go with noname=yes to indicate that section doesn't actually have a name.

If one were different, I'd say dealer's choice, but personally would go with the higher of the two. Putting it as the same as the road it's crossing just doesn't make sense to me.
fortera_au (2025-04-23 10:06:03+00:00): If you were to go with the argument of it being a crossover because it's neither Jones or Gladstone Road, then trunk_link would be what you'd want for a crossover between the two sides of a trunk.
Supt_of_Printing (2025-04-23 10:17:15+00:00): I disagree; it makes perfect sense to me. I am making it the 'Higher of the two. It's not part of Gladstone nor Jones, so as it is within the Highway's lanes, it is part of the highway, just as a crossover without intersecting roads is, but is not a link.
dp7 (2025-09-08 08:01:57+00:00): Il valico di Forca di Presta era già mappato da anni come punto della strada provinciale: provvedo a rimuovere questo duplicato.
rumbrummer (2025-09-08 09:26:47+00:00): Grazie
Robert Whittaker (2025-05-04 07:32:49+00:00): In this changeset you added an AED at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12777792401 with the location description "on the wall bell inn pub Anslow". There's a "Bell Inn" pub mapped in the village at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/266229314 , but this is almost 1km SW from where you placed the AED. Are you sure you put the AED in the right location?
phlustik (2025-05-04 15:57:01+00:00): Ahoj uživateli mapperue,
toto je druhé z Tvých hromadných mazání v této lokalitě, kde jsi smazal mj. objekty  viditelné na Ortofoto nebo DMR5G.
Tvoje změny jsem revertoval:
osm.org/changeset/165806982
Příště prosím o konzultaci autora nebo místní komunity předtím, než bys plánoval mazat takové množství prvků.
Děkuji.
eggie (2025-04-23 08:25:46+00:00): Dag Michiel.. 
Landuse en water bewerken is best lastig. 
Dat is inderdaad wel anders nu. Ik heb de landuse en het water aangepast.
Er was geen akkerland meer maar gras. Het is immers een natuurgebied. 
Het water ligt nu in een multipolygoon.
Het pad heb ik lsogemaakt van de landuse=residential. 

Het is nog lang niet klaar hier denk ik.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-04-23 08:40:16+00:00): Dag Michiel Hier heb je Lange Bunder 44 verplaatst naar een ander deel van Bavel.
Waarschijnlijk door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus..
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=165314390

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-04-23 09:14:20+00:00): Adres teruggeplaatst
eggie (2025-04-23 09:44:18+00:00): sports_centre omgezet naar fitness_station
MichielOl (2025-04-23 19:40:04+00:00): sorry
eggie (2025-04-23 20:32:34+00:00): Hoi Michiel....  Het lijkt allemaal zo simpel, maar dat OSM heeft een steile leercurve. Er wordt je niets kwalijk genomen.
Ik heb makkelijk praten, want ik map al een poosje.
Laat je niet ontmoedigen en houd plezier in mappen.
Iedereen was ooit beginner. 

Eggie
Grass-snake (2025-04-23 18:39:41+00:00): Здравствуйте, спасибо за вклад, немного поправил. Подскажите, а это КП или СНТ? Это часть села Кадниково или отдельный населённый пункт (важно для корректной адресации)?

Также обращаю внимание:
- если отмечаете границу НП,  то лучше не вырезать внутренние контуры (inner) из границ НП, так как обычно они являются их частью;
- если отмечаете названия улиц, то не сокращайте статусную часть: пишите не "ул.", а "улица".
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%89%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B8_%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%80%D1%8B_(%D0%BD%D0%B5_%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%B7%D1%83%D0%B9%D1%82%D0%B5_%D0%B8%D1%85)
Z80_BinLife (2025-04-24 18:15:07+00:00): Здравствуйте! Спасибо за исправления, принял к сведению. Я только не понял что значит не вырезать. На самом деле я не рисовал, я просто поле переименовал в НП и чуть подправил границы. Но на будущее хотелось бы знать о чем речь.
И это именно КП а не СНТ. В конце того года статус поменяли.
Z80_BinLife (2025-04-24 19:08:53+00:00): Вот так официально: "с 12 августа 2024 года территория КП «Кадниково» включена в черту населенного пункта село Кадниково Сысертского района".
Grass-snake (2025-04-25 19:37:55+00:00): Спасибо за ответ и за "КП" в названии, извините, не туда посмотрел по внутренним областям. Старая ошибка, которая тянулась из самой первой версии. Описания мультиполигонов по ссылке, они позволяют в одном объекте указывать несколько "внешних" областей или вырезать внутренние области в них.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9E%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F:%D0%BC%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%BD
Z80_BinLife (2025-04-28 15:18:45+00:00): Ок, спасибо, примерно понял, приму к сведению.
Aleksandar1994 (2025-04-23 08:20:35+00:00): Hi Вальдимар,

I noticed that you’ve been working on the Чистополь ауылдық округі (19024608) recently. However, it appears that the multipolygon is not closed. Do you have any local knowledge that could help resolve this issue?
Вальдимар (2025-04-23 08:39:12+00:00): Hello. Don't rush. Everything will be fine
fortera_au (2025-04-23 08:21:05+00:00): Hi, you changed the address of node/12417453546 to 9 Twynam Road, was this a mistake? The node is a couple of streets over on Coil Way
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165315769
ClydeGuy (2025-04-24 04:46:45+00:00): Not a mistake. The correct address for that large round building is 9 Twynam Road. It's the main office and clubhouse for Lifestyle Meridian (a retirement community). Thanks, Pete
Frans S (2025-04-23 09:18:43+00:00): Hello Cassie
Thanks for mapping on this project.
Your mappings are very accurate, however, you did not square each building you mapped or adjusted.
Please be sure to square each rectangular with the Q key.
Best regards and keep mapping
Lezurex (2025-04-23 13:20:08+00:00): Hallo Matthias

Wie genau muss ich mir eine halbe Etage vorstellen? Du siehst: entweder ist etwas eine Etage oder nicht, dazwischen gibt es nichts. Entsprechend sollten bei building/roof:levels nur Ganzzahlen genutzt werden.

Wenn das wie hier nicht ganz so klar ist, zählst du die Etage einfach dorthin, wo sie am meisten abdeckt. Bei der 18 wäre dies also building:levels=3 und building:roof=1 bei der 20 building:levels=2 und building:roof=2

Kannst du das so anpassen?

LG Lezurex
Matthias Wiesmann (2025-04-24 07:03:20+00:00): Hallo, danke für die Mitteilung, ich habe es angepasst. 

Matthias
habi (2025-04-23 12:21:23+00:00): Ciao MBU_3302

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Beim einten Defibrillator sind die Öffnungszeiten auch im Betreiber kopiert, ich habe das mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165331054 korrigiert.

Hat es denn hier wirklich zwei Defis, beide im zweiten Stock?

Gruss aus Bern,
habi

Bei irgendwelchen Fragen gerne hier in den Kommentaren nachhaken oder bei https://c.osm.org/c/107 eine Diskussion eröffnen, wir versuchen gerne zu helfen.
Christian Arvidsson (2025-04-24 07:10:06+00:00): Ok, inget skyltat förbud, men högst olämpligt att gå på dessa gator precis som en motorväg.
eggie (2025-04-23 09:18:06+00:00): Dag Gasbij..
Het door jouw ingetekende hellingdeel zit nergens aan vast en zal niet routeren.



MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-04-23 13:00:35+00:00): Kleurcode aangepast naar UK English  grey.
gr eggie
AurélienQ (2025-04-29 14:36:16+00:00): Bonjour, je crains qu'il n'y ait une erreur dans tes modifications. Je vois mal une station de 220000V si petite et à cet endroit 😅
Je te laisse corriger ?
habi (2025-05-19 09:36:32+00:00): Ciao Simon
Auch wenn der `highway=track` "gut befahrbar" ist, ist es von Rechtes wegen evtl. kein `highway=cycleway`, da sind die Regeln in Deutschland ziemlich streng.
Das "gut befahrbar" ist besser gelöst indem die `surface` und  `smoothness`-Werte angepasst werden.
Gruss aus der Schweiz,
habi
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-23 08:21:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Generała Sikorskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12778036465
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12778036478
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12778036483
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12778036491

"Kościuszki":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12778036470

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Nathan_A_RF (2025-04-23 21:51:46+00:00): Hi, please make sure to change maxspeed:type tags when changing maxspeed tags. Cheers.
marsbar28 (2025-04-24 13:32:21+00:00): Hi, I'll make those tweaks now.
Langlaeufer (2025-04-25 08:44:59+00:00): Einfahrt frei bezieht sich auf alle Fahrzeugarten, nicht nur auf Kraftfahrzeuge.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165320193
Langlaeufer (2025-04-25 08:47:56+00:00): Die Fahrräder sind durch bicycle=designated von der Einschränkung ausgenommen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165320193
marc__marc (2025-11-17 21:34:20+00:00): Bonjour,
vous avez effacé les heures d'ouverture, le type de cuisine et l'indication d'absence de toilettes accessible.
est-ce que c'est voulu ou c'est un bug de l'application ?
Cordialement,
Marc
one_electro_dan (2025-04-23 15:45:52+00:00): Hello, it looks like you deleted the name of some apartment buildings, why is that?
martinst (2025-04-23 09:10:08+00:00): Hallo MasterBen,
in OSM werden (verfallene) Wege nicht einfach gelöscht, sondern je nach Zustand mit einem Lifecycle-Prefix versehen, siehe OSM-Wiki!
Bis auf Way 800839901 kenne ich die gelöschten Wege, sie sind alle existent.
Revertiert in Changeset 165321694.
Taya_S (2025-04-23 13:21:18+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165333891
Taya_S (2025-04-23 13:21:19+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165333891
Taya_S (2025-04-23 13:21:49+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165333910
Lezurex (2025-04-23 19:24:42+00:00): Hi diec_import-catastro-Malaga,

I reverted your changeset. This is not how these challenges are fixed. You duplicated the church, which contradicts the OSM principle of "One feature, one element". This task should've been marked as "not an issue", as the building, in fact, has this shape.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165349334
Taya_S (2025-04-23 13:22:11+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165333932
silversurfer83 (2025-04-23 14:36:53+00:00): Hi Matze :)

ein kleiner Hinweis: Die Parkplätze liegen ja sicher nicht mitten auf der Fahrbahn. Daher sollte der Punkt für die Parkplätze auch nicht auf die Linie der Fahrbahn gesetzt werden, sonder möglichst genau da, wo die Parkplätze auch wirklich sind.

Um das zu korrigieren kannst du mit der rechten Maustaste auf den Punkt klicken und ihn dann mit dem passenden Befehl von der Linie entnehmen.

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165321664
happymatze (2025-04-23 15:25:55+00:00): Hallo Silversurfer83,

vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Jedoch ist im Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Street_parking) zu lesen:


"Parkplätze im Straßenraum können am einfachsten als Eigenschaft an der Straßenlinie erfasst werden (also an der mit highway=* getaggte Linie)."

Da es sich um eine ziemlich schmale Nebenstraße handelt und man die Parkplätze nicht übersehen kann, war ich davon ausgegangen, dass ich die simple Erfassungsmethode ausreichend sein dürfte. Wenn gewünscht, kann ich auch die Fläche konkretisieren.

Viele Grüße
happymatze
Taya_S (2025-04-23 13:20:29+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165333856
Norbert Dichter (2025-04-23 10:30:16+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165322468
DaveF (2025-05-05 21:27:24+00:00): Another example of mistagging a railway station.
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/273210309
Blue Clip (2025-04-23 09:34:10+00:00): apologies
NieWnen (2025-04-23 18:08:06+00:00): Jak zmieniasz układ skrzyżowania, to proszę dbaj o relacje. Miałem to zakolejkowane, żeby zmienić wieczorem po weryfikacji, ale widzę, że niestety zostało zepsute i tak wcześniej :/
Tomek | Yanosik (2025-04-25 05:11:05+00:00): Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi na błędny etap edycji. Wezmę to pod uwagę przy kolejnych.
Bienson (2025-04-24 00:02:54+00:00): Hallo,

Im Liegenschaftskataster ist der westliche Bach als "Hermelinsiepen" bezeichnet.
cuteredpwnda (2025-04-24 05:57:02+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis und die korrektur - ich hatte mich an der Entfernung der Einmündung von der Quelle aus orientiert und scheine verrutscht zu sein.
Papryczka (2025-04-23 10:04:38+00:00): Znowu dodałeś natural=scrub na trawniku, przestań
Papryczka (2025-04-23 10:10:12+00:00): Jeszcze gorzej, "poprawiłeś" z dobrego na złe:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1055968662/history
Norbert Dichter (2025-04-23 10:29:49+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165324800