piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-03-31 06:21:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-04-06 17:57:33+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164449462
eggie (2025-03-31 07:24:09+00:00): Hi S_ggy,
I see also a node the platform is disused?

Greetz,
eggie
Leo Slager (2025-03-31 08:19:27+00:00): Duplicate platforms removed from the map.
Leo Slager (2025-03-31 08:18:21+00:00): Duplicate platforms removed from the map.
streckenkundler (2025-03-31 17:01:11+00:00): Hei, also hier ist was an Grenzen kaputt gegangen. iD hat mit Grenzen da manchmal so reichlich seine Probleme, ohne das der Nutzer was dafür kann... Ich hab erst mal die eine Grenze repariert. Die Grenze https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18915372 schaue ich mir abend an... die hat auch zwei Lücken. Mit JOSM werde ich dann auch Grenzsegmente aktualisieren, da gibt es einige Abweichungen...

Grüße,

Sven
NeisBot (2025-03-31 06:27:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-04-06 17:57:01+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164449462
mcliquid (2025-03-31 06:53:31+00:00): Hoi, das Komma muss sein :)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
DD1GJ (2025-03-31 07:04:17+00:00): reverted, vandalism
NeisReview (2025-03-31 18:16:04+00:00): #NodeDragging

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for contributing to the map. I’ve reviewed your recent edits and noticed that at least one node of a way was moved. This can sometimes happen unintentionally, and it’s led to some unusual intersections or overlaps between street segments and other map elements.

Could you kindly confirm whether these changes were intentional or if they may have been made by mistake?

Thank you, and I look forward to your response!
---
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11307573577
NeisReview (2025-03-31 18:16:46+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164323901
Jakka (2025-03-31 08:42:36+00:00): openstreetmap n'est pas un carnet d'adresses personnel. Compte tenu de la loi sur la protection de la vie privée, vous restez responsable de vos ajouts.
Binco (2025-04-15 15:42:03+00:00): Non è ancora in costruzione, io la rimuoverei per inserirla quando lo sarà. Per lo meno attenderei la fine dell iter burocratico e delle varianti. In modo da avere una traccia definitiva del percorso e delle gallerie. Anche perché dubito inizino il lavori prima del 2026.
rikmede (2025-04-15 17:20:51+00:00): Il tracciato con le gallerie e le relative fasce di rispetto è stato inserito nel prgc con la variante 51. Ad oggi sono stati aggiudicati i lavori sulla base di un progetto esecutivo. I lavori dovrebbero partire entro l'anno. Le gallerie e il tracciato difficilmente cambieranno, probabilmente le rotatorie di innesto subiranno delle modifiche. Quello che ho inserito in OSM è quanto è gia presente sul piano regolatore vigente.
 Se lo ritieni più corretto si potrebbe utilizzare "porposed", tuttavia non è una proposta è quanto verrà realizzato.
Binco (2025-04-15 20:12:02+00:00): Secondo me si sarebbe meglio, aspetterei almeno che sia conclusa la bonifica e che inizino gli sbancamenti.
Marek-M (2025-03-31 09:59:21+00:00): Nadal łączysz obszary z drogami mimo wielokrotnego upominania. Niby się starasz ale nie uczysz się na błędach.
pavvv (2025-03-31 12:58:45+00:00): Please don't create such large landuse=residential areas and instead split it so that it doesn't cover any highway=residential. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18917850
Mapping_Maślice (2025-04-14 12:26:59+00:00): relation/18917850 is a multipolygon that residental landuse way/131547171,      
created 14 years ago - please check history, was converted into
InsertUser (2025-04-04 17:10:26+00:00): Please do not add fictional nonsense to the map.
bxl-forever (2025-03-31 09:28:48+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM.

For small places like cafés, pubs, shops… it is better to create a new node and add the tags there, instead of modifying the building itself.

We fixed your edit.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12715594656
NeisBot (2025-03-31 16:38:49+00:00): Hi nibbiobruno08, and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear or difficult to understand.

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment
NeisReview (2025-03-31 19:17:30+00:00): #osmitaly #mapathon
NeisReview (2025-04-03 07:33:11+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164315254
eggie (2025-03-31 07:29:17+00:00): Hoi,

Ik had het al samengevoegd hier. je hoeft geen adressen aan te maken.. :)

MVG
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-31 23:28:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1746469594/history - why you changed brand:wikidata to point to American rather Canadian variant of Safeway?
NeisBot (2025-03-31 16:39:05+00:00): Hi nibbiobruno02, and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear or difficult to understand.

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment
NeisReview (2025-03-31 19:45:45+00:00): #osmitaly #mapathon
YomanNH (2025-09-17 14:02:08+00:00): Zerkniesz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4966073 ? W miejscu uwagi drogi jednokierunkowe "nacierają" na siebie i nie ma żadnego wyjazdu. Pewnie któraś droga jednokierunkowa jest w złą stronę.
Yunan973 (2025-12-30 17:21:42+00:00): Bonjour,

je ne comprends pas la présence au même endroit d'un parking de 6 étages (building:levels=6) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168716359 et d'un immeuble de 6 étages (building:levels=6) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35541815.
habi (2025-03-31 07:59:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1171862941 habe ich dann auch noch unbenannt :)
NeisBot (2025-03-31 16:39:12+00:00): Hi nibbiobruno07, and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear or difficult to understand.

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment
NeisReview (2025-03-31 19:17:35+00:00): #osmitaly #mapathon
The Polish (2025-04-02 11:55:11+00:00): Cześć, wycofałem zestaw zmian. Zmiana nazwy jest niezgodna z ustaleniami Społeczności: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Liczebniki
karafior (2025-04-02 12:59:19+00:00): Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi i wycofanie błędnych zmian.

Powodem zmiany był brak wyników dla alternatywnej pisowni w wyszukiwarce.

Zaproponowałem dodanie tej pisowni w nazwach alternatywnych w zmianie #164420160:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164420160#map=18/50.371460/18.939997
Toni100 (2025-03-31 19:57:39+00:00): Moi! Kiitos ilmoituksen ratkaisusta! Ilmakuva antaa ymmärtää että kyseessä on torni/lintutorni. Kyseessä on kuitenkin hiekkasiilo! Tein muokkauksen tuohon pisteeseen, siihen onkin sopivasti tägit man_made=silo, content=grit ja siirsin kyltin paikkaa.
lankapuhelin (2025-04-01 04:56:33+00:00): Kiitos viimeistelystä :)
NeisBot (2025-03-31 16:39:20+00:00): Hi Nibbiobruno18, and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear or difficult to understand.

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment
NeisReview (2025-03-31 19:17:45+00:00): #osmitaly #mapathon
DD1GJ (2025-03-31 08:34:11+00:00): Spam reverted
woodpeck (2025-03-31 09:12:23+00:00): Dear nibbiobruno02, you are adding a lot of very oddly shaped buildings to OSM. Consider using the "q" key to make them rectangular where the aerial imagery suggests they are. 

Also, please use a changeset comment that describes your activity to other mappers (e.g. "added buildings in ..."). Don't write "#osmitaly-94", nobody knows what that is.
NeisBot (2025-03-31 16:39:47+00:00): Hi nibbiobruno17, and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear or difficult to understand.

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment
NeisReview (2025-03-31 19:17:49+00:00): #osmitaly #mapathon
histrio (2025-03-31 12:57:44+00:00): Building Part should be a closed area based on the tag "building:part=yes"

Please, pay attention to the warnings of the map editor.
histrio (2025-03-31 13:00:54+00:00): This change-set introduces lines without proper tags.

Please, do not forget to add core tags like building.
notmyproblem1 (2025-09-06 15:14:14+00:00): come sai che c'è un torrente sotto a una strada trafficata?
granpasso811 (2025-09-08 07:42:50+00:00): me lo dice regione liguria:
https://srvcarto.regione.liguria.it/geoservices/apps/viewer/pages/apps/download/index.html?id=2542
notmyproblem1 (2025-09-08 19:40:49+00:00): interessante il sito, grazie
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-07 05:38:08+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164616578
bxl-forever (2025-03-31 09:11:17+00:00): Correction faite ici
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12715531278
bxl-forever (2025-03-31 09:13:59+00:00): Merci pour l'info mais svp ne jamais détruire les points.

Un commerce ferme ? → Il faut simplement retirer les tags (nom, type de commerce, téléphone…) et en faire un commerce vacant.

Effacer est uniquement autorisé pour les points qui disparaissent à tout jamais, p.ex. bâtiment démoli.

Nous avons corrigé votre erreur.
pavvv (2025-03-31 10:53:08+00:00): W jaki sposób zweryfikowałeś tę anonimową uwagę?
voltairovicz (2025-03-31 10:59:09+00:00): Bo to jest moja uwaga, którą wczoraj dodałem będąc tam na żywo z telefonu ;) na barierce mostku jest przykręcona tabliczka z nazwą patrona
pavvv (2025-03-31 16:21:15+00:00): Okej, ciekawe, bo nie mogłem nigdzie znaleźć takiej nazwy na internecie, więc może warto dodać source:name
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-31 08:10:59+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397976589

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Patchi (2025-04-01 20:05:18+00:00): Bonjour ski-planet,

Je ne vois pas trop l'intérêt d'ajouter une zone résidentielle Puy-Saint-Vincent 1400 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1373288173) alors qu'il existe déjà des zones résidentielles à cet endroit :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237817790
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237817774
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3206076
peut-être serait-il plus judicieux de changer le nom des zones déjà existantes.

Bonne continuation,

Patchi.
ski-planet (2025-04-03 11:55:41+00:00): Bonjour.
Nous sommes en train de géolocaliser toutes les zones des stations de ski françaises. Comme dans notre système Puy-Saint-Vincent est divisée en 3 "sous-stations" 1400,1600 et 1800, nous avions besoin de localiser le plus précisément possible la zone qui correspond à Puy-St-Vincent 1400. C'est plutpôt clair pour 1600 et 1800, mais 1400 n'existait pas d'où la création de cette zone résidentielle regroupant les hameaux du bas de la station. Mais peut-être ai-je mal interprété ce Puy-St-Vincent 1400 ?...
Patchi (2025-04-03 19:04:31+00:00): Bonsoir ski-planet,

Je ne vois tout à fait le rapport entre "une zone de station de ski" et une zone résidentielle. Ce sont 2 choses différentes. Utiliser un landuse=residential pour caractériser une station de ski est à mon humble avis un détournement de la fonction initiale de ce tag (voir la page Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential). Je vous invite à en discuter au sein de la communauté OSM française avat d'entreprendre ce genre de modifications en masse et vous conseille également à lire cette discussion à propos des stations de ski : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/stations-de-ski-proposition-dedition-en-masse/31585/2.

De plus comme indiqué dans mon premier message rajouter un landuse=residential au-dessus d'un ou plusieurs landuse=residential existants ne va pas arranger la situation. Par exemple 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1373288172, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1373288171 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237951032 se chevauchent. Si toutes ces zones landuse=residential que se chevauchent ont des noms différents, ça va devenir compliqué de savoir quel est le nom de la zone résidentielle.

Bonne continuation,

Patchi.
Patchi (2025-04-03 19:19:58+00:00): Je viens de créer une discussion à ce sujet sur le forum OSM France et vous invite à participer à la discussion.

https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/detournement-du-tag-landuse-residential-comme-station-de-ski/32838
Patchi (2025-04-03 20:10:21+00:00): Si vous êtes affiliés au site https://www.ski-planet.com, je vous invite également à lire en détails les droits d'auteurs et license pour l'utilisation de la carte OpenStreetMap https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright car les plans affichés sur le site https://www.ski-planet.com ne respectent pas les conditions indiquées puisqu'il n'y a aucune indication visible de type "© OpenStreetMap contributors" sur le plan ni de renvoi sur la page https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright ce qui pose problème.
yvecai (2025-04-04 05:07:42+00:00): Bonjour, ces commentaires donnent peut être une impression très négative. C'est juste que beaucoup d'éditions d'un coup sur le même thème, si ce n'est pas fait tout juste, dégrade vite la qualité d'OSM et les contributeurs ont souvent été échaudés. Prenons le temps d'en discuter, Puy Vincent 1400 et les autres ont certainement leur place dans les données OSM d'une manière ou d'une autre.
eggie (2025-03-31 08:44:00+00:00): Dag janwillig
Oke... en niet alleen in OsmAnd.
Ik heb wel foot=yes verwijderd. Dat is default.
Het zal wel een vergissing zijn geweest  van voorgaande mapper. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-31 08:45:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=51.98052%2C4.49684%3B51.99011%2C4.49961#map=17/51.983859/4.500779&layers=N
toster234 (2025-03-31 13:26:46+00:00): Raczej to nie jest poprawna granica Zenonowa, jest mniej więcej tak jak ja poprowadziłem ją wcześniej.
Zacząłem kopać głębiej ze względu na Rubinowa 45, pokazuje tam dalej Huta Mazowszańska.

Sprawdź ustawę LX.495.2023 https://edziennik.mazowieckie.pl/eli/POL_WOJ_MZ/2023/12353/ogl/pol/pdf

według mojej interpretacji granica Zenonowa to ta fioletowa linia na obrazku, co by zgadzało się z tym że budynek https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190706794 dalej wskazuje miejscowość Huta Mazowszańska.

Daj znać co o tym sądzisz :)
toster234 (2025-03-31 13:28:22+00:00): Kiedy klikniesz na drogę w tych lokalizacjach na stronie kowala.e-mapa.net, da się zauważyć zmianę miejscowości
voltairovicz (2025-04-01 07:35:58+00:00): To juz nie wiem, chyba zatem juz nie ruszam tej granicy, bo az tak nie jestem pewien jak to powinno w koncu byc. Z drugiej strony to dokument z 2023, kiedy jeszcze Zenonowa nie bylo, to czy cala ulica rubinowa nie powinna przejsc do Zenonowa? Pozostawiam juz tobie stwierdzic
MaliMrav (2025-04-01 05:23:10+00:00): Samo da proverim, da li ovde ispravno uneto ime ulice? Možda treba "Boška Milutinovića", a ne "Boška Milutinović"?
eggie (2025-03-31 08:49:16+00:00): Dag Arie... Je hoeft geen oneway=no te taggen. Dat is default in de routering.
Alleen als je bang bent dat een andere mapper oneway=yes gaat toevoegen vullen we als aanwijzing oneway=no in. Bv op een tweerichting fietsrotonde.

MVG
eggie
VLD549 (2025-05-07 15:22:32+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. I see the typo you corrected, but shouldn't the name be Huisartsenpraktijk Hoogveld?

With your confirmation, I can make the change. Thank you!
pieterpaul (2025-05-07 17:22:14+00:00): Ok!
Same name as on their website
https://www.huisartsenhoogveld.be/
VLD549 (2025-06-04 14:16:00+00:00): Thank you, I'll make the change.
VLD549 (2025-06-04 14:17:36+00:00): I can't seem to make the change, could you do it please?
eggie (2025-03-31 09:05:35+00:00): Dag Pierre

Ten zuiden van het station staan de wegen op access=private. Dan zal het toch nooit voor fietsers routeren?

Graag reactie,
eggie
eggie (2025-03-31 09:15:15+00:00): Er zitten ook gaten in de Jacobsroute nu. Die liep over dat fietspad dat je hebt verwijderd.
PierreBelge (2025-03-31 09:18:26+00:00): Dag Eggie,

Het fietspad wordt inderdaad openbaar. De Jacobusroute zal ik aanpassen. 

Groet,
Pierre
eggie (2025-03-31 09:22:47+00:00): Oke... Ik heb een stukje weer gesorteerd, maar op een gegeven moment splits de route wonderlijk. 
Je kunt routes alleen aanpassen met editor JOSM.
Editor iD gooit de sortering door de war. 

Ik weet niet of je al ervaring hebt met routes inleggen of herstellen?
Voor josm zie:
editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047



MVG
eggie
PierreBelge (2025-03-31 09:26:46+00:00): Dank voor de tip! :)

Ik ga mij hier binnenkort nader in verdiepen.

Mvg,
Pierre
eggie (2025-03-31 09:30:41+00:00): Top!  Zal iemand van de wandelrouteexperts  even laten kijken.

Die route was al stuk. 

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2025-03-31 09:35:23+00:00): Ik zal je in ieder geval ons welkomstbericht sturen met wat tips zoals Nederlandse mappers ze krijgen.
MVG
eggie
Peter Elderson (2025-03-31 11:31:49+00:00): Ik heb naar de route gekeken, er was niet veel mee mis, maar ik heb hem naar de laatste inzichten aangepast. Dwz de aanlooptak naar het station is nu enkelvoudig opgenomen met de rol  approach, zodat de rondwandeling zelf ook als rondwandeling in OSM en toepassingen staat. Bijvoorbeeld https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=2720291&type=relation&map=15.0/50.8249/5.9958 geeft dat tegenwoordig mooi weer. Iets anders is dat er getagd is dat de route gemarkeerd is met het schelpsymbool, maar via google streetview zie ik nergens een markering staan! Kan toeval zijn, maar gewoonlijk zijn er toch een paar plekken waar je ze kan zien.
eggie (2025-03-31 11:33:35+00:00): Peter, thx!
gr eggie
Peter Elderson (2025-03-31 14:34:24+00:00): Graag gedaan. Ik had niet goed gekeken: er liggen blauwe tegels, met logo en pijlen, in de stoep en op de grond, dus het is echt een gemarkeerde route.
Le Petit Léo (2026-01-18 11:06:07+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez ajouté le tag natural=water à ce réservoir d'eau de secours, mais ce tag ne s'utilise que pour des entendues d'eau : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:natural%3Dwater

De même que pour water=reservoir qui ne s'utilise que pour des retenues d'eau : 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:water%3Dreservoir

Dans notre cas, emergency=water_tank est suffisant.

Si éventuellement vous voulez taguer plus précisément ce genre de réservoir vous pouvez regarder la page du wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:emergency=water_tank

Pourriez-vous corriger les différents réservoirs que vous avez tagués ainsi ?
Bonne journée
Hallios (2026-01-18 19:14:53+00:00): Le type était : réservoir d’eau pour pompiers, je ‘ai modifie en réservoir d’eau de secours.

je regarderais si j’ai d’autres réservoirs dans ce cas .


Merci.
FajrAl (2025-04-01 13:16:58+00:00): mohon wilayah edit jangan terlalu luas
aTarom (2025-03-31 13:15:05+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, con el tag
fixme=fixme
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1373301446/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1373301445/history
es quizás
fixme=continue?
saludos
map per (2025-03-31 14:18:02+00:00): Because of review_requested:
The edit looks good, thank you!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 14:34:37+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12715529882/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this edit
Would it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )
Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house )

Something else?
Dimacn (2025-03-31 11:20:31+00:00): Прекращайте заставлять других людей исправлять за вами! Вы зачем переделываете дороги track (стихийно накатанные и с/х) в path?  Фактически вы удалили дорогу до кладбища. Я отменю вашу правку.
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
NeisBot (2025-03-31 16:40:49+00:00): Hi upupagialla10, and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear or difficult to understand.

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment
NeisReview (2025-03-31 19:17:57+00:00): #osmitaly #mapathon
Mezonens (2025-03-31 14:53:22+00:00): Hi!
Way: 107112103 needs the highway=service tag restored.