piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2024-10-25 09:00:36+00:00): Hoi  Kort door de bocht. Bij een G7 bord en/of duidelijk alleen voor voetgangers dan highway=footway

Staat er geen bord dan highway=path gebruiken. Daar dan wel eer aangeven bicycle=yes of no
Wanneer een pad eindigt loodrecht op een trottoir maakt dat niet uit. Er staat nergens in de wet dat je niet op de stoep mag fietsen. Wel dat je op de hoofdrijbaan moet fietsen.
Een trottoir loodrecht oversteken mag dus. Wanneer er een hoge stoeprand is zal het niet voor fietsen bedoeld zijn en dan kun je footway gebruiken. Het blijft soms onduidelijk.
Mapse
eggie
Boink (2024-10-25 10:37:19+00:00): Ben ik het niet helemaal mee eens. 

1) Fietsers gebruiken het verplichte fietspad of het fiets/bromfietspad.

2) Zij gebruiken de rijbaan indien een verplicht fietspad of een fiets/bromfietspad ontbreekt.

Als je recht oversteekt, maak je als fietser nog steeds gebruik van het trottoir en houd je je niet aan de verplichtingen zoals aangegeven.
eggie (2024-10-25 10:46:10+00:00): Dit is al vele malen aan de orde geweest. Het is echt niet zo. 

Ik heb het dan over een pad dat dwars op een trottoir uitkomt. Er staat nergens dat je zo'n pad niet mag oversteken om naar de rijbaan te gaan waar een fietsers hoort. Er zijn vast wel draadje over te vinden.
Een trottoir in de lengte befietsen hoort inderdaad niet. Je moet dan op de rijbaan.
Is er een hoge stoep dan zal het in de meeste gevallen niet geschikt zijn voor fietsers en dan zal het een footway zijn. Daar is bicycle=no al default. 
Maar het zijn lastige situaties soms. Bij twijfel map ik in het voordeel van de fietsers.

Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-10-25 10:49:48+00:00): Het is steeds een afweging. Up to you als lokale mapper.
Echt consensus is er niet.
Ik twijfel ook wel eens wat te doen. 

Hier zo'n draadje waar die discussie loopt
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/path-vs-footway/90360/5
Frans S (2024-10-26 08:12:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please realize that this is a building and road mapping only. (read the instructions :-) )
Focus on highways which connects settlements, buildings and villages.
Don't waste energy on mapping traces in between agricultural plots and rural areas, ending somewhere in the middle of nowhere.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158316007
wireguy (2024-10-25 12:43:43+00:00): Hi Ian, welcome to OSM!  I changed two items and wanted to let you know.     A business may be gone, but the address should stay, so I added an address node for 16 Witherspoon.   Grassland is for a savannah or prairie, so not nj.  Changed to landuse grass.   See wiki more info.   If you have any q's ask, or there is a slack and discord for osm.
Gregory Peony (2024-10-25 00:35:53+00:00): Most of the building footprints here are inaccurate. Again it's a question of imagery interpretation. Features in imagery; like trees, walls or buildings can obscure others. In situations like these you should try to work out what is the shape of a building (in this case) likely to be. Sometimes different imagery sources can help with this, other times you'll have to give it your best guess.

In this case all of the building footprints should have been squared, given the low resolution imagery you were working with and the architecture of the surrounding buildings. It was more likely that the imagery was distorted or that the building was partially obscured by trees/vegetation than it is for it to have this unique footprint. Buildings tend to take take on this shape near highway intersections of 'odd' angles.

I hope this helps.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158316372
Gregory Peony (2024-10-25 00:48:22+00:00): Just for fun I uploaded a guess of these building footprints based on ESRI imagery alone, they may not be as accurate as if I had used Mapbox, but I wanted to give you an example of what to do in these situations. You can find the changesets via the top right of the task menu in the tasking manager (under task data), or near the bottom of the project main page (changesets in OSMCha).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158316372
gscholz (2024-11-29 08:54:27+00:00): Hi ygtylc,
your recent edits have left behind several errors regarding overlapping ways (blue markers);

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=34.15566&lat=39.15458&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-24 23:41:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Promienna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12286702714
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12286702715
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12286702716
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12286702717
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12286702718
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12286702719
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12286702720
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12286702721
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12286702722
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12286702723
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12286702724

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-10-25 09:03:25+00:00): Poprawione.
Константин Гам (2024-10-30 20:51:10+00:00): Уважаемый Pavel, пожалуйста, ПРЕКРАТИТЕ маппинг по форумам или откуда вы там берёте данные. 
Продолжение улицы Коммуны от улицы Химиков, там не вы его нарисовали, НЕ существует, там котлован и куча работ по перекладке инженерных сетей, и временная бетонка разбитая... не ломайте навигацию и не вводите в заблуждение. Мы мапим то, что на земле...
citrula (2024-10-29 09:33:17+00:00): reverted
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158317376
BCNorwich (2024-10-29 06:31:52+00:00): Remove obvious fiction.
Metzor (2024-10-25 08:54:57+00:00): Hallo Enzyklopädix!

Danke für's Verschönern der Aufgabelung der B 27 vorm Pragsatteltunnel.

Die damit einhergehende Relationsänderung, die zwangsläufig eine recht große BoundingBox hat, poppt bei einigen Leuten im Radar auf. Und lässt sich nicht mit allen QA-Tools vernünftig darstellen. Bei der großen Leserschaft lohnt sich doch die Mühe, eine ausführlichere Änderungssatzbeschreibung einzutippen :-)
Ich wäre dir jedenfalls dankbar.

Zwei Links zum Abgleich:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?Enzyklop%C3%A4dix
Siehe Tabelle mit erster Zelle "Changesets".

Fröhliches Kartieren und viele Grüße
Metzor
Enzyklopädix (2024-10-26 18:21:31+00:00): Du hast so recht... Ich brauch da mehr Disziplin. ist eher so nach einer längeren Bearbeitung endlich speichern und fertig. Aber ich gelobe Besserung. 

Weiist du eigentlich ob das TMC-Tagging noch weiter verfolgt wird? Man findet nur veraltzete Einträge auch im Wiki.
Metzor (2024-10-26 18:51:39+00:00): Hallo und danke für deine Antwort :-)

Alles was ich immer im Forum lese, geht in die Richtung: Braucht kein Mensch mehr, aber aktiv löschen traut sich auch niemand. Aufwand zum Flicken sollte man aber nicht spendieren, wenn durch eine Änderung was am TMC "kaputt" geht.

Viele Grüße
Metzor
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-10-26 11:31:17+00:00): Pour quelle raison ce lien cyclable a été retiré? La piste cyclable devient un trottoir à cet endroit et il est interdit aux vélos de circuler sur le trottoir, donc il faut conserver le lien pour que les vélos puissent rejoindre la rue et continuer de rouler dans cette direction. À moins que la ville de Longueuil ait complété la piste cyclable?
mdgm (2024-10-26 17:48:00+00:00): Salut, ça me semblait bizarre que la piste traverse l'herbe entre le trottoir et Taschereau. Mais c'est vrai que c'est la seule façon de router les vélos à partir de ce point. En tout cas, je devrais passer par là dans les semaines à venir et confirmer par où passe cette piste cyclable maintenant.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-10-26 19:21:48+00:00): Excellent merci!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 03:53:11+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659189
Bart- (2024-10-25 09:00:45+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
GeoKitten_import (2024-10-25 02:48:50+00:00): I also used Esri Clarity imagery for this one
JJIglesias (2024-10-25 03:12:08+00:00): Saludos, los valores de place=hamlet o place=village en Bolivia, se colocan en base a los datos del censo oficial disponibles. Hasta que se publiquen los datos del Censo2024, siguen los datos del censo CNVP2012, para este caso Puerto Chimore tiene 130 Habitantes por lo tanto es place=hamlet.

Cuando salgan los datos muy posiblemente cambie a place=village, pero por ahora NO.

De todas formas muchas gracias por tus ediciones en toda esa zona.

Te sugiero si viajas por esas zonas usa la aplicacion Mapillary para subir fotos tipo Streetview, y la aplicacion OSMAND para agregar puntos de interes, mientras viajas.

Slds

JJ
JJIglesias (2024-10-25 03:13:22+00:00): Ya hice la corrección pertinente y otros pequeños cambios en esa zona.
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-25 05:53:44+00:00): Reviewed as requested.  Good edit.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158319644
ralley (2024-10-25 03:06:34+00:00): Changeset description was wrong, actually updated completed apartments
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-25 05:52:52+00:00): Reviewed as requested.  Good edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158319660
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-25 05:52:31+00:00): Reviewed as requested.  Good edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158319673
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-25 05:52:21+00:00): Reviewed as requested.  Good edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158319679
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-25 05:52:16+00:00): Reviewed as requested.  Good edit.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158319690
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-25 05:52:11+00:00): Reviewed as requested.  Good edit.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158319696
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-25 05:52:05+00:00): Reviewed as requested.  Good edit.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158319707
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-25 05:51:59+00:00): Reviewed as requested.  Good edit.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158319716
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-25 05:51:53+00:00): Reviewed as requested.  Good edit.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158319723
AkuAnakTimur (2024-10-25 03:27:05+00:00): tolonglah belek email baca changeset discussion... carilah makan cara elok-elok...
TrickyFoxy (2024-10-26 00:30:34+00:00): Что значит ЮБ?
Frans S (2024-10-26 15:03:39+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please realize that this is a building and road mapping only. (read the instructions :-) )
Focus on highways which connects settlements, buildings and villages.
Don't waste energy on mapping traces in between agricultural plots and rural areas, or ending somewhere in the middle of nowhere.


This means that you have to know the width of the trace. Forget narrow paths.

How to measure the width of a trace In Ideditor when you are in doubt of the width.
Command Ctr+shift+M  shows the  measuring dimensions tab.
After that command, select add line.
Zoom in very far (20 - 25 mtr) so that you have a good view on the shoulders of a road.
Then draw a line between the shoulders.
You can read the value in the measurement tab. (select Metric value)
<2 mtr tag it Path
> 2 mtr tag it unclassified, residential or track depending on the situation. 
 Delete the line after measuring.
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158320179
Frans S (2024-10-26 15:05:43+00:00): btw. Please map no land use areas. TM is not a good tool to facilitate land use mappings, because you are limited by the task squares. Landuse areas not. 
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158320179
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-10 18:50:58+00:00): Hello!

You used
access=privateub
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12287338112/history

Have you maybe meant
access=private
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
GrabMY_ainayusof (2025-04-14 02:18:24+00:00): Hello hi!

I mistakenly typed the private access into privateub. There is no meaning behind it just pure typing error. 

Thanks for highlighting and have a good day Mateusz Konieczny (:
rempshaener (2024-10-26 17:08:46+00:00): Hallo,
du hast um einen Review deiner Änderungen gebeten. 
Für Objekte wie Geschäfte, Ärzte usw. – oder auch Rettungswachen – gibt es zwei Möglichkeiten, diese zu erfassen:
-	Am Gebäude (im OSM-Sprech am „way“)
-	Als Punkt innerhalb des Gebäude-Umrisses („Node“)
Die Rettungswache war bislang als Punkt erfasst. (Den Name des Punktes hast du auch angepasst). Der Punkt war gut erfasst, sogar inklusive Referenz („RW 32“).
Du hast die Daten jetzt zusätzlich am Gebäude eingetragen. Das ist so nicht richtig, weil es jetzt zwei Rettungswachen gibt.
Was jetzt zu tun ist: du müsstest deine Änderungen am Gebäude einfach wieder zurücknehmen.
Das war es schon.
Wenn du noch Fragen hast: einfach hier im Kommentar melden.
Viele Grüße
chris2map (2025-04-20 16:28:18+00:00): Hi, what is the meaning of "man_made=arch" on these highways? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1328061949 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1328061948
Devdatta (2025-04-21 04:50:21+00:00): Thanks for catching this issue. I have fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165219372

The man_made=arch was supposed to be put on node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12287401120

This tag represents the arch present on roads outside many villages in india. Since there isn't any existing tag for this kind of feature, following https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like, I have started tagging them with man_made=arch
ManuelB701 (2024-10-30 18:00:05+00:00): Gibt es einen bestimmten Grund, warum du für die ganzen Straßen die impliziten Werte explizit ausschreibst?
Die Idee ist, dass die einzelnen Wege von den Daten eher überlastet werden und dementsprechend unübersichtlich zu verarbeiten sind.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Baloo Uriza (2024-10-25 13:32:25+00:00): Please consult wiki.openstreetmap.org for how to post address correctly.  Additionally, OSM is not an advertising platform, the description tag is an inappropriate venue for ad copy.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158321697
NeisBot (2024-10-25 05:50:18+00:00): Ooops, it seems that some of your names are a bit unusual ...

Amount>=2
#NeisLab #Minutely #Naming
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-25 06:18:06+00:00): Hello 山伏天, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. In my opinion, and based on the automatic translation, it is not necessary to add the description with the name-tag to each mapped element.

What do you think? 
I look forward to hearing back from you.

Thank you.
Nationalpark Sächsische Schweiz (2024-10-25 06:13:25+00:00): ... meant to say: reverted changeset #158307541. Sorry!
bike'n'hike (2024-10-25 07:06:37+00:00): A blunt access=no is not feasible here.
Please undo your change or I will revert it.
RD ÖBF (2024-10-25 08:32:07+00:00): Servus , was willst du Rückgängig machen ? Auf diesen Weg ( Gugenschlag weg ) ist Fahrrad fahren verboten !
bike'n'hike (2024-10-25 10:24:40+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Access_hierarchy_simple2.png

Es ist vollkommen in Ordnung wenn Grundeigentümer die Wegberechtigungen hier eintragen, aber bitte vorher die Bedeutungen der entsprechenden Attribute durchlesen.

vehicle=private oder forestry, reicht aus, damit werden alle Nichtberechtigten von den Wegen abgehalten.

Der Weg ist seit 9 (!) Jahren bzgl. access korrekt eingetragen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-25 15:42:45+00:00): Changeset reviewed as requested.  All tags look correct.  Good edit.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158322474
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-12-24 14:31:16+00:00): Hi NKA, 
I have seen that you created a relation  https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18208522 for Hardangerfjorden which contains smaller fjords forming the largen one, but per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bay=fjord this should not be done on a relation. It should either be a new way or a polygon. What is your opinion? Should be done with another way?
NKA (2024-12-25 10:38:32+00:00): Relations are needed in some cases like this one. Many fjords are mapped with relations. Better to change the wiki.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-12-26 08:49:12+00:00): I do agree on that, but can that be describer that if you are creating a relation it should be a polygon like here https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6166030. 
It is not a big work to use current coastlines and create a mulitpolygon relation. What do you think about reworking Hardangerfjorden  relation to be as polygon?
NKA (2024-12-26 14:24:35+00:00): I would like to keep the mapping exactly as it is now.

Please do not map a relation using the coastline. It would conflict with local community discussions.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-12-26 14:55:44+00:00): I will not change it, I just noticed that this relation you have created is the only one with this approach. I saw community added all as relations with the coastlines
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Wbv
map per (2024-10-25 18:20:49+00:00): Because of review_requested:
This edit looks good, thank you!
woodpeck (2024-10-25 06:44:15+00:00): Dear Jaanharis, you are adding a lot of buildings and uploading them with a changeset comment of "home". 

1. You can add more than one building in a session, and then upload once you have created a handful. You do not have to upload every single building. As a changeset comment, please do not write "home", but instead explain what you did: "Added builidngs in NAME_OF_CITY" or so.

2. The editor can help you make buildings square with the "Q" key. Of course not every building is a rectangle in reality but some buildings that you have drawn could probably benefit from squaring.

3. Instead of using descriptive names ("rizwan shoe shop"), try to find the proper tag (if you type "shoe" in the feature box it will help you find the right tag for a shoe shop) and then only use "Rizwan" for the name, without "shoe shop" as this is already in the tag. This will also give you a nice icon on the map!
ibanez (2024-10-29 20:24:07+00:00): Howdy, glad to see some building contributors here. You can select a building outline and use the ‘Q’ keyboard button in the iD editor to leave the building outline rectangular. BR
eggie (2024-10-25 07:45:23+00:00): Welkom bij OSM  We nemen in OSM alleen bedrijven op waar daadwerkelijk een bezoekadres is en waar 'in het veld' staat aangegeven dat hier een bedrijf gevestigd is. Is dat het geval hier. 
Maak verder gebruik van de bestaande adresnode om op bij te taggen. Alleen een naam zal niets doen in OSM Ook de aard van het bedrijf toevoegen. Bv office=company.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-10-25 07:47:28+00:00): De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode. Graag reactie op gestelde vragen.
MVG
eggie
mweper (2024-10-26 12:47:35+00:00): Hi. Have you checked the existence of this turning restriction yourself? Do you have any official data source where this can be checked? It seems too strange to me that you can't turn right at this junction.

Regards.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-25 07:30:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7618296308
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892645243

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Dave Venables (2024-10-25 08:13:48+00:00): Excellent work on adding postcodes https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/pc-stats/DE/ DE1, DE4, DE5, DE45 and DE72 should be showing 100% when the statistics are next refreshed. 
If possible please add addr:city for the relevant post town Derby, Matlock, Ripley, Bakewell etc.
Sometimes useful to add addr:suburb, addr:village or addr:town https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/addr-tags.html although I have only ever used addr:town for Wirksworth (DE4 addr:city = Matlock)
Dave Venables (2024-10-25 08:14:54+00:00): DE Post Towns https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/post-towns/DE.html
nevw (2024-10-25 10:48:35+00:00): You have added a building but it follows the boundary of the property line instead of being an accurate depiction of the building shape.
nevw (2024-10-25 12:47:59+00:00): Reshaped
habi (2024-10-25 07:52:26+00:00): Rausgefunden, als ich https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4492883 gelöst habe...
eggie (2024-10-25 09:10:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Wanneer iets priveterrein is dan hoeft het niet verwijderd te worden uit OSM.
We kun je een weg of hek (dat heb je ook verwijderd (barrier=log)  van de juiste accesstags voorzien.
Het hele bosgebied is hier ook verwijderd.
Ik draai deze changeset weer terug.
Op de barrier=log kun je evt access=private bijtaggen. Ook op het wegdeel tussen de bospercelen.
Wat is het probleem dat een bos op de kaart staat. Zo houden we weinig bos meer over in Nederland :)
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-10-25 09:14:32+00:00): reverted by changeset #158327848

Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust. De verwijderde bosweg stond al op access=no en was dus juist getagd. Deze zal niet routeren in OSM, maar wel bv voor de Brandweer die ook navigeert via OSM.

MVG
eggie
waldyrious (2025-01-12 23:06:28+00:00): Why did delete individual trees and replace them with tree_row instead? That destroys information about how many trees there are, and their location, and also prevents addition of tree-specific information (height, diameter, species, etc.)