piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
A_Prokopova_lyft (2023-03-24 13:36:31+00:00): Hi, telcodude!
My name is Anastasia, and I'm Artem’s teammate. We are mappers on the OSM team at Lyft. 
Thank you for such detailed information about the airport infrastructure. Based on it, we double checked our changeset. At this moment we have already mapped indoor features for this terminal in scope of the project. We will gladly use the information you provide as needed in future projects
Happy mapping, Anastasia!
A67-A67 (2023-02-20 12:12:26+00:00): Ik heb de brugvorm verbeterd. Er was niets vreemds aan de hand, dus het zou geen probleem moeten zijn om deze aan te passen.

De adrestags heb ik van de brug verwijderd. Een brug heeft namelijk vrijwel nooit een adres.

De tag residential=bridge was ook incorrect. Deze heb ik verwijderd.
bad_mapper (2023-02-22 11:49:05+00:00): Добрый день, вандал! У меня есть документы и ссылки на официальные названия этой дороги. Верните official_name, :be, :ru обратно.
Спасибо!
LidaCity (2023-02-22 15:31:03+00:00): прошу прощения, действительно, изменилось наименование автодороги Н-22085 на "Подъезд к агрогородку Хотляны от автомобильной дороги Н-23458 Чирвоная Горка – Габриелевка" (согласно 9/112951 "Решение  Минского областного  исполнительного  комитета
13 декабря 2021 г. № 1126" https://etalonline.by/document/?regnum=r921n0112951&q_id=7068038) - проворонил обновление, это я исправлю

Ваше же название - из устаревшей публичной кадастровой карты https://map.nca.by/ - там данные 2018 года (9/88420 Решение Минского Областного Исполнительного комитета
23 февраля 2018 г. № 161 https://etalonline.by/document/?regnum=r918n0088420&q_id=7068131)

Ещё претензии есть?
bad_mapper (2023-02-22 15:39:24+00:00): Претензий нет. Только правильно Красная Горка, так у людей написано в паспортах при регистрации и в документах Белпочты, например. Чирвоная Горка – это что-то из альтернативной вселенной чиновников, оформлявших документ.
LidaCity (2023-02-22 17:21:50+00:00): Покопался насчёт "Чирвоной горки" - а их у нас в стране много оказалось.
в википедиях (например https://be.wikipedia.org/wiki/Чырвоная_Горка_(Уздзенскі_раён)и https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Хотлянский_сельсовет и на кадастре https://map.nca.by/)  Чирвоная Горка указывается как единственно верное. У Лемцюговай - два варианта.

Закона о названии не нашёл (корни где-то в БССР, у меня доступа к тем законам нет)
Но Узденский райисполком (https://uzda.gov.by/ru/nas_punkty/) говорит что в узденском районе 5 населённых пунктов "Чирвоный ххх", из них три "Чирвоных" посёлка в Хотлянском сельсовете.

Я бы Чирвоная Горка засунул в official_name:ru (а не alt_name:ru как сейчас).

Ну а название автодороги - надо оставить как есть. Хватает автодорог, где указаны уже несуществующие населённые пункты, вплоть до того что я нигде следов найти не могу.
bad_mapper (2023-02-23 06:20:25+00:00): Я уже упоминал выше, что у меня есть документы из сельсовета, в которых указаны Красная Горка, Красный Клин и т. д. К тому же на знаках написано Чырвоная, Чырвоны, что можно перевести, непосредственно, как Красная и Красный. Никто здесь не использует слова Чирвоный и Чирвоная. Я курирую эту местность. Спасибо за помощь!
❤️‍🔥 (2023-02-21 06:22:08+00:00): thanks for your edit, i fixed the multipolygon "issue". I don't use JOSM but in iD a point goes grey if there are multiple lines joined to that point. You can select a point and press ⌘ ⬆️ to see all lines joined to that point. presumably JOSM has a similar feature.
bxl-forever (2023-02-20 11:57:02+00:00): Hello,

Your change has been reverted.

This is a very special situation here, this is not a one-way street.  We spent a lot of effort getting the map right, through intensive surveying and effort, and we worked with the city authorities to make sure our data was correct.  We also make sure to explain the situation as accurately as possible in changeset titles, which are available for anyone opening the history of a way before touching it. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/580840381/history)

You broke this in a 4-word changeset title, and your "Mapillary Images" source fails to show any one-way sign on this narrow part.

OSM is not just a map for cars, we use routing for other kind of vehicles, such as delivery vehicles, taxis, cyclists and more.
Bolt061 (2023-02-21 07:57:55+00:00): Hello bxl-forever,

Thanks for your time in reviewing the edits made, i have just reviewed the incorrect edits and will make sure that these kind  of errors are not repeated here after.

Thanks Again..Have a great day ahead !
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132781100
euroPathfinder (2023-02-21 09:19:32+00:00): Hi SgtLunix,
Willkommen bei OSM und vielen Dank für Deinen Beitrag. Hier noch ein nützlicher Tipp für künftige Edits: durch Drücken der Taste Q bei aktiver Auswahl des Gebäudes wird die Form automatisch rechtwinklig gemacht, was idR. auf alle Häuser zutrifft. Ich korrigiere Deine Form, einfach nur als Tipp für zukünftige Beiträge :)

Viele Grüße
euroPathfinder
SgtLunix (2023-02-24 12:18:07+00:00): Hi, aaah guter Hinweis.. Vielen Dank! :)
plennert (2023-02-22 06:35:19+00:00): Hello
why did you delete the image an wiki_commons key?
ivanbranco (2023-02-22 07:58:08+00:00): Hi plennert,

the image=* and wikimedia_commons=* tags are used to link images that depict the physical object, not for logos. There's an exception for trekking routes symbols, but even in that case the tag is wiki:symbol=*, not image=* or wikimedia_commons=*.

Some examples with other "emergency" values near here: node/9197283504, way/826170846, node/5526100199

Usually we use operator:wikidata or brand:wikidata in order to link the respective logos (otherwise imagine every one of the 47847 elements mapped as operator=Deutsche Post with 47847 linked Deutsche Post logos). So I god idea in this case could be to create a "Freiwillige Feuerwehr Singen" Wikidata entry and link the logo there and then tagging operator:wikidata=* here.
OPENER next (2023-02-22 15:29:49+00:00): Hi, can you please explain why you added "tram_crossing" here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10680173197
nam0 (2023-02-22 15:45:33+00:00): Hi.
You are right, it was wrong declared. At this point, the street is a bis difficult: Corrected Street: Tram is SHARING a lane with cars, but at a small piece of the street, the cars are driving NEXT to the Tram
bxl-forever (2023-02-20 11:48:08+00:00): Hello,

Your edit broke cycle routing and cycle relations.

It looks like you are editing without local knowledge.

I want to inform you that in Brussels, most one-way streets have exemptions for other modes of transport, most often for cyclists.  It is very rare to see a street with "oneway=yes" and no such exemption; we always endeavour to carefully review the road signs before updating the map.
I fixed this one and will review your other "oneway" changes.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Shaun das Schaf (2023-02-21 18:25:09+00:00): Hallo M Kempe, willkommen bei OSM!

Bitte nutze den name-Tag nur für den tatsächlichen Namen eines Objekts, nicht als Beschreibung.
"Ortsein-/ausgang" ist sicher kein offizieller Name für irgendwas ;-)

Ein Ortsschild kann wie folgt eingetragen werden:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:traffic_sign%3Dcity_limit

Ich habe es korrigiert.
Du kannst meine Änderungen hier betrachten:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132848043

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
wielandb (2023-02-24 17:44:08+00:00): Hey :)

Kannst du mir erklären, was genau du hier gecleanuped hast?

Ich sehe du hast ganz schön viele Gleise gelöscht, was eigentlich... nicht so gut ist. :o
Siegmarer (2023-02-24 18:09:52+00:00): Warum werden hier korrekt „razed“ getaggte Gleise gelöscht?
user_11115677 (2023-02-24 19:56:00+00:00): Wiederhergestellt. Die Objekte waren korrekt getaggt und werden ausgewertet.
mj1988 (2023-02-24 21:19:47+00:00): Hi, ich wüsste nicht wo dort Gleise sein sollen? Die waren ja kreuz und quer im nirgendwo.
Siegmarer (2023-02-24 21:35:57+00:00): Der Tag: razed sagt aus „überbaute Gleise, somit war alles korrekt. Man respektiert indes die Sachen, die andere erstellt haben. Die einen erfassen halt Gullydeckel, Bäume oder Briefkästen.
ivanbranco (2023-02-22 13:05:11+00:00): Ciao, grazie per la modifica.

La prossima volta aggiungi un commento che faccia capire agli altri utenti cosa hai modificato per favore. Ricordati inoltre che l'indirizzo deve essere identico al nome della strada, in questo caso "Via Ulrico Hoepli" invece di "Via Hoepli".

Buon mapping
Road–Runner (2024-02-05 19:45:45+00:00): Hallo. Der von dir eingetragene Weg zum Geigensee geht kreuz und quer über Felsen und stimmt nicht mit den Wegteilen im Orthophoto überein. Bist du den Weg selbst abgelaufen?
Schöne Grüße RR
metjowagner (2024-02-06 12:14:24+00:00): Hallo Road Runner,
Vielen Dank für die Anmerkung. Ich bin den Weg nicht selbst angelaufen, habe die Gemetrie aber auch gar nicht geändert, sondern nur die Relation "Herzass Trumpf Variante Regelstein" ergänzt. Es wäre super, wenn du den Wegverlauf ans Orthofoto anpassen könntest oder noch besser, den Track vor Ort aufnehmen könntest (im nächsten Sommer). Viele Grüße,
Jochen
chris66 (2023-05-10 16:55:04+00:00): Hi,
Tagging ist komisch:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/824069934

Grüße
Chris
GerdP (2023-05-10 17:02:12+00:00): Wohl war, aber ich habe daran nichts geändert.
chris66 (2023-05-10 17:16:40+00:00): Achso, Du hast nur die Geometrie geändert.

Dann schau ich mal wie man so einen Modellflugplatz heutzutage taggt. :)
Warin61 (2023-02-23 01:15:21+00:00): Hi,

This has broken the bus route relation 3331347 No 711
kurisubrooks (2023-02-23 01:39:14+00:00): Hi Warin, Thanks for noticing this.

We're currently discussing the removal of bus route relations in the Sydney area as the majority are unmaintained and have last been updated more than 3 years ago... This route was last updated 4 years ago by you actually.

I'm looking at the relation in iD and it seems fine to me, can you point out where/which way has broken the relation?

Thanks,
Chris.
Warin61 (2023-02-23 07:45:25+00:00): I have fixed it. 
For how it was broken  the route ways were not in sequence. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Warin61/diary/45106

I keep an eye on 2 bus routes I entered. Because they may not have changed for some period of time does not mean they are 'unmaintained'.
kurisubrooks (2023-02-23 11:09:39+00:00): Looking at your changeset, the broken sections were for a section that I had not made modifications to... Thank you regardless...

Also, out of the hundreds of bus routes in Sydney, I'd like to thank you for maintaining 2 of them.
lyjjimmy (2023-02-23 11:47:13+00:00): Given Westmead Hospital traffic arrangement has been modified for some time due to light rail construction, I doubt whether the stops and route segments are still current. At least a quick comparison with current route and stops from TfNSW (https://transportnsw.info/routes/details/sydney-buses-network/711/23711), the route relation is not "maintained" to the latest.
kurisubrooks (2023-02-23 13:12:45+00:00): Thanks for the heads up about the traffic conditions around Westmead.

I've gone ahead and updated the traffic conditions around Westmead Hospital which includes the separation and duplication of Hawkesbury Road and part of Hainsworth Street. I've also added crossings and turn restrictions that I was able to gather from a YouTube video we have permission to source data from, and have updated the bus stop locations based on TfNSW data (which we also have permission to use). 

@Warin61 I removed the bus route relations from this portion of road as they needed to be updated anyway. You can refer to the link that @lyjjimmy included in his comment for the correct route in order to fix it.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132925426

Have a nice night fellas!
lucumon_import (2023-03-07 09:24:42+00:00): Hola, este conjunto de cambios no es correcto. El elemento modificado en efecto es un edificio, por tanto tiene que ser etiquetado como tal. Un saludo.
Federico Gentile (2023-03-07 10:13:38+00:00): No es correcto: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity
Britzz (2023-03-15 07:47:58+00:00): Merci pour la mise à jour dans OSM. Pas de nouvelle présentation d'OSM envisagée ? Bonne journée.
lucumon_import (2023-03-07 09:25:27+00:00): Hola de nuevo. Has cambiado la nueva dirección web de la Escuela, por la de la antigua EPS, lo cual es incorrecto, un saludo.
habi (2023-03-15 09:06:42+00:00): Ciao Chris
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10680263035/ looks like a cycle barrier on aerial imagery.
Do you remember if that's correct?
Greetings,
Habi
cbeddow (2023-03-29 19:25:59+00:00): Yes, this is correct! I forgot to come back to it, but fixed it now
habi (2023-03-30 07:07:23+00:00): Awesome, thanks.
This undocumented `amenity=fixme` led me down quite the rabbit hole, ultimately resulting in https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/discussions/546 and https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/38449 :)
NastassiaKalesnikava (2023-02-20 11:17:32+00:00): Added speed limit 20 mph. Source - local traffic rules and user feedback. #mbx_usa_editing
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132783205
eggie (2023-02-20 10:59:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Lijkt me oke.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
user_18526234 (2023-02-20 20:27:11+00:00): Hello Honzaiky,
I seems that you have added or eddited some landuse=village_green. Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=village_green
Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=greenery
For a list of alternative tags.

Greetings
Aleksey Gorelikov (2023-02-20 10:41:08+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-nhs/explore?location=30.655553%2C-87.857400%2C15.75
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-21 01:26:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 132814250 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious vandalism in Poland
NieWnen (2023-02-20 11:02:14+00:00): Proszę rób zmiany na mniejszym obszarze...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15511887
Co to za dziwna relacja?
user_18526234 (2023-02-20 20:27:11+00:00): Hello 수원수원수원,
I seems that you have added or eddited some landuse=village_green. Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=village_green
Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=greenery
For a list of alternative tags.

Greetings
Frans S (2023-02-20 11:02:30+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please use the correct tag when you map roads. See this wiki where and how to use the "service" tag. Most of them here are just "residential"
There are still a lot of buildings to be mapped here. Don't mark a task as complete mapped when there are still buildings to be mapped.
Best regards and keep mapping.
hvanajak (2023-02-21 11:57:53+00:00): Hello Frans,
Thank you for reviewing our changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies for incorrect edits. Going forward, we will ensure to not repeat such errors again. Thanks once again for fixing the issue, looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
hvanajak
spiregrain (2023-02-20 14:52:57+00:00): Thank-you!   These were all my mistakes, I think.
Dodko (2023-03-16 08:42:10+00:00): addr:city=Stará Bystrica netreba mazať z adresy
Johlo6 (2024-02-24 19:35:13+00:00): Ahoj,
ďakujem za upozornenie.
kartograph (2023-07-08 10:14:17+00:00): Hi, der Parkplatz scheint hier eine Einfahrt zu kreuzen. Sollten wir die Einfahrt hier aussparen und mit `area:highway=service` mappen?
Supaplex030 (2023-07-08 12:43:54+00:00): Mhm, hört sich für mich beides ok an, solange es eine Parkbucht ist und kein Fahrbahnparken. Baulich/optisch gehört es ja meistens irgendwie zum Parkstreifen, aber von der Funktion her zur Einfahrt... Bin da emotionslos.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-20 19:40:08+00:00): As mentioned previously....

Please take the time to leave better changeset comments. What did you change and why? Refer here if you have questions: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comment
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132786731
map per (2023-02-22 10:57:53+00:00): Wegen "Meine Änderungen überprüfen": Sieht alles gut aus, danke!
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-20 19:40:04+00:00): As mentioned previously....

Please take the time to leave better changeset comments. What did you change and why? Refer here if you have questions: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comment
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132786793
user_18526234 (2023-02-20 20:27:11+00:00): Hello LukasHavlicek,
I seems that you have added or eddited some landuse=village_green. Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=village_green
Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=greenery
For a list of alternative tags.

Greetings
mawutor (2023-02-22 16:17:18+00:00): Thanks for your contribution and keeping mapping to help improve the map of Ghana also kindly remember to square your building when tracing the digital foot prints of builds.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132786932
user_18526234 (2023-02-20 20:27:11+00:00): Hello Eric-Chambly,
I seems that you have added or eddited some landuse=village_green. Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=village_green
Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=greenery
For a list of alternative tags.

Greetings
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-20 12:00:33+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10273696737
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10273696981
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10273696980
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/984596620
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/984596621
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/984596622

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-28 09:03:52+00:00): jesteś pewien że na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/612258464/history jest kontraruch rowerowy?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4043283
zuicz (2024-01-05 20:15:32+00:00): AIRPORT ma być z wielkich liter?
Anas masuris (2024-01-05 20:29:30+00:00): Nazwa pisana wielkimi literami widnieje w Statucie sieci kolejowej:

581	ŚWIDNIK - ŚWIDNIK PORT LOTNICZY	STTH	Świdnik	0,000	
-
581	ŚWIDNIK - ŚWIDNIK PORT LOTNICZY	PO	Świdnik Miasto	0,818	TAK
-
581	ŚWIDNIK - ŚWIDNIK PORT LOTNICZY	PO	Lublin AIRPORT	3,094	Port Lotniczy Lublin S.A.
Nathan_A_RF (2023-05-12 15:31:36+00:00): Do you have any other reference than "signs"? Signs can be wrong or sign the obvious route while ignoring the true road number
Mauls (2023-05-12 16:19:12+00:00): Signs are a primary on-the-ground source, and there are many signs, including infrastructure signs.

If you are suggesting the signs are wrong, then feel free to put forward alternative sources.
Mauls (2023-05-12 16:20:11+00:00): As a non-sign official source, try "The M61 Motorway (Kearsley Spur) (Speed Limit) Regulations 1999".
Nathan_A_RF (2023-05-12 18:17:49+00:00): That's better. Just in my experience, road signs can be wrong or designed to not include certain road numbers. e.g. a sign may say 'M61' when it was meant to say '(M61)'
Mauls (2023-05-12 20:02:15+00:00): Yes, but not the infrastructure marks on lamposts, the distance markers, the start of motorway signs.

On the other hand, the whole “A666(M)” seems to have come about because of a single sign that said “A666” instead of “(A666)” (as it now does).
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-04-18 13:53:53+00:00): Can you verify that admin_level should be 5 since it is updated to a city, but this area is still under https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6555245.

Do you think Miyan Joleg County should remain admin_level=6 even if it is updated to a city? If not, can you fix the boundaries so they do not overlap, and add admin_level=6 missing ones?
rittoch (2023-02-20 12:17:14+00:00): According to the customer feedback and Maxar Premium Imagery the road name was changed #mapbox_contribute
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132788253
Frans S (2023-02-23 14:01:08+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Please adjust wrong positioned buildings as well
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2023-02-23 14:17:18+00:00): Hi. Another issues.  Please do not cluster buildings, but map each of them individually.
Best regards
achsaw (2023-02-24 12:41:33+00:00):  Hello Frans,
Thank you for reviewing our changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies for incorrect edits, we have modified the building. Going forward, we will ensure to not repeat such errors again. Thanks once again for fixing the issue, looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
achsaw
user_8466505 (2023-03-20 21:27:06+00:00): I come to this terminal regularly. Can assist with surveying if needed