piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Cowboy79 (2023-10-06 11:10:41+00:00): Falsch. Der Router macht alles richtig. Wie soll er use_sidepath sonst interpretieren?
Danke für die Unterstellung, absichtlich die Karte zu fälschen! Auf das Niveau einer solchen "Diskussion" lass ich mich jetzt nicht herab.
Meinst du nicht, es wäre sinnvoller wenn Leute wie du ihre Zeit nicht mit Kontrolle anderer Mapper verschwenden, sondern einfach kartieren würden? Oder nicht die Fehler suchen, sondern korrigieren würden? Ich hab bei der Masse meiner Änderungen mit Sicherheit schonmal einen Fehler gemacht. Und werde auch wieder einen machen. Und zwar ohne Absicht...
Hier zum Beispiel: Der Fehler liegt in der fehlenden Verbindung von Forststraße zum begleitenden Radweg Römerstraße für Fuß- und Radverkehr. Hab ich nicht sofort gerafft. Herzlichen Glückwunsch, dass du einen Fehler bei mir enttarnt hast! Leider hast du ihn offensichtlich auch nicht gefunden. use_sidepath war hier vermutlich korrekt, aber die Entfernung ist keine böswillige Fälschung, sondern eine wenig elegante Übergangslösung gewesen. Falsch war das Nicht-Vorhandensein von use_sidepath sowieso nicht, allenfalls ein Fehlen. Und davon gibt es noch ziemlich viele Stellen auf osm...
silversurfer83 (2023-10-07 12:17:46+00:00): Wenn der router alles richtig macht muss ich dich falsch verstanden haben. Kommt vor.

Finde es schade, dass du mir hier niedriges Niveau in der Diskussion vorwirfst. Und ja, ich meine, dass meine Zeit sinnvoll investiert ist, wenn ich in einem bestimmten Umkreis um meine Heimat herum regulär ein Auge auf die Karte und ihre Änderungen habe. Und da ich dabei nicht alleine bin hat erst vor wenigen Tagen ein waches Auge einen Fehler bei mir entdeckt und ihn korrigiert. Wenn ich nun bei anderen etwas sehe, frage ich einfach mal nach, was da gemeint sein könnte. Auch von einigen Neulingen, die "jemand soll sich meine Änderung ansehen" angeklickt haben, habe ich schon sehr positive Rückmeldung bekommen, dass ihre Arbeit hier Feedback bekommt.

Deine Änderungen scheinen idR auch Hand und Fuß zu haben und ich bin mir relativ sicher, dass du hier nicht böswillig und unter Vorsatz falsche Informationen in die Datenbank einträgst. Ganz im Gegenteil.
Das Einzige Problem, was ich mit deiner Arbeitsweise habe, habe ich schonmal erläutert. Wäre ein Traum, wenn du in Zukunft mal Quellen und ordentliche Kommentare an deine Änderungen packen würdest. Würde mir dann wahrscheinlich auch die ein oder andere doofe Nachfrage sparen.

Das hier ist nunmal ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt und da kommen wir nicht umhin auch einmal miteinander zu reden. Ich hoffe, du kannst damit leben.

happy mapping
silversurfer83
jtracey (2023-10-02 21:16:10+00:00): Resolves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3917826
Bear-in-a-box (2023-10-03 09:56:18+00:00): Hi, even if it might still exist on Mapillary, in reality it does not exist any more. The field has been plowed up until the limits of "Zandgroeve". The plowing has completely destroyed it. What is to be done in such a case?
bxl-forever (2023-10-03 18:14:13+00:00): A user made pictures during a survey, these pictures are very recent.

The usual rule is that if a footway can be seen and used, then it "exists" for OSM.

We would bar access (with access=private) only if there are signs or documents that explicitely forbid people to use it.  And we are aware that this might be a tricky decision.  There is a wiki page that explains it: if you delete it completely, sooner or later someone will add it again.  If the owner of this fields intends to prevent people from using it, then it’s better to have a sign or something, otherwise we’ll always end up in the gray zone.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Here are the tags we used on this path:
highway=path
surface=ground
trail_visibility=bad
wheelchair=no

These seem to correctly reflect the situation and warn users that they should not expect a well-polished path but something a bit rough.

Is there anything we had been missing?
bxl-forever (2023-10-03 18:15:13+00:00): Link to the Mapillary pictures (August 2023).
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1408422306369091
Bear-in-a-box (2023-10-03 19:21:41+00:00): But I was there 2 days ago and it was as I described.....no more path.
I believe that is more accurate than 2 month old pictures
Bear-in-a-box (2023-10-03 20:13:10+00:00): Just checked the mapillary pictures. Compared to the actual situation this looks like a highway. There is absolutely nothing left of the path. It's a pity and illegally removed by the farmer!
MxxCon (2023-10-03 22:40:37+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you tag so many footpaths that do not go along existing streets as sidewalks?
Not every footpath is a sidewalk. Footpaths that go along parking lots shouldn't be tagged as sidewalks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142062735
flyingember (2023-10-03 23:15:09+00:00): For consistency.   Look around and the same design is a sidewalk in nearly every other case across multiple counties.   Be it a school, college or park.
MxxCon (2023-10-03 23:24:14+00:00): It's not about consistency. It's about *accurate* tagging.
Just because other areas are incorrectly tagged doesn't mean you should do that as well "for consistency". Incorrect tagging should be fixed, not spread further.
flyingember (2023-10-04 00:17:10+00:00): You can fix all 100,000 paths then.  That ship has sailed.
flyingember (2023-10-04 00:20:49+00:00): Remember that a primary goal is routing consistency.  If you change from an 8 foot wide piece of concrete onto an 8 foot wide piece of concrete did you step off the sidewalk?  If the directions say to turn onto the path is it something other than the sidewalk?
MxxCon (2023-10-04 00:36:13+00:00): Primary goal is NOT routing. Routing is one of many different use-cases of OSM database, all of them are equally viable and important.
Just because the surface is the same doesn't mean it's classified the same way.
There are footpaths that are actually paved with asphalt, but you don't tag them as roads.
ADAC Touristische InfoSysteme (2023-10-05 06:02:13+00:00): You changed the city Tanger into a shop (shop=bathroom_furnishing). Please remove and add place=city again
alain2003 (2023-11-24 21:21:55+00:00): this user still not revert back to city,
i do it myself
Gonéo (2023-10-04 12:45:37+00:00): Je n'ai pas encore eu l'occasion de passer sur place depuis la piétonisation mais le maxspeed=30 (et le FR-zone30) me semble suspect. La communication de la métropole parle de rouler au pas. 

Est-ce qu'il ne faudrait pas retirer les champs maxspeed et source:maxspeed ?
Lyon-St-Clair (2023-10-04 16:17:25+00:00): Salut,

Bien vu ! A priori il y a une limite officielle à 6 km/h sur ce nouveau secteur piétonnier. Pour l'entrée de la rue Sainte-Catherine il n'y a qu'un panneau pour l'instant.
sannkc (2023-10-03 01:59:35+00:00): Has the bus lane been upgraded to a busway?  The contraflow bus lane on Oak between 9th and 10th already has a tag on the Oak Street road path.  If it's still just a bus lane, then adding a separate path for a busway is not correct.  Bus lanes and busways are not the same.
flyingember (2023-10-03 02:27:10+00:00): It was a busway from day 1.  The federal definition is any short stretch of street for the exclusive use of busses.

https://www.transit.dot.gov/research-innovation/busways
sannkc (2023-10-03 03:03:21+00:00): Yes, that's how the FTA defines busway, but here I'm referring to OSM and the iD editor's definition of the term.  The busway preset in iD is for bus-only roads, not bus-only lanes.  Bus lanes have different tags and are tagged as part of the road path.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbusway

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:busway
flyingember (2023-10-03 03:39:07+00:00): It’s a bus only road.  The SB road is for cars and busses

The unprotected NB road is busses only. 

It’s like a cycle track, it’s a separate road for a separate mode but with only one paving being needed.
flyingember (2023-10-03 03:48:01+00:00): The notable problem is actually signal. routing.  The contra flow bus lane doesn’t make the signal for the road function as two way.

So for transit routing use busses need a second intersection to allow this routing.

And at 9th there is a bus only signal cars ever use.
sannkc (2023-10-03 05:00:06+00:00): Well, except that it's not a separate road. It's one road, or one paving, as you put it.  

But if what you say is true, then how would a contraflow bus lane, as defined by OSM, be different from what exists on Oak?  The definition of busway=opposite_lane states: "The route is a lane, but buses may go in the direction opposite to other traffic (the bus lane is a contraflow bus lane)."  To me, that sounds exactly like what exists on Oak. 
 If not, what makes NB Oak different?

As for transit routing, couldn't that can be easily handled by refining the tags on the existing features?  Bus routes, for instance, allow for forward/backward tags that specify the direction of travel for buses along the route.  

I'm not entirely sure what you mean by signal routing.  Maybe this would be a situation where placing separate traffic signal nodes on each incoming way would be more appropriate than a single signal at the junction?  That way each signal could be tagged more specifically to indicate its direction and if it's bus-only.
Frans S (2023-10-10 14:31:57+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
1 building have you mapped as 3 buildings. ( just follow the outlines and map it as 1 building,


Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142064535
Frans S (2023-10-10 14:30:06+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142064672
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:43:46+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077095
WoodWoseWulf (2023-10-04 08:18:17+00:00): Hi Mel, what is a wildlife tree?
Mel_lunz (2023-10-04 13:47:17+00:00): Hi!! A wildlife tree is a tree, dead or alive that has obvious use by wildlife. In this case it is a very dead tree with multiple holes in it where cavity dwelling birds have made their homes! I’m currently studying in a forestry program at the local university and I have edited this map as part of my spatial data class. With that said please forgive me if anything else I’ve done looks weird! I am still learning 😊
alester (2023-10-05 04:00:38+00:00): It's tagged as a park, so I would suggest changing the tagging to natural=tree instead. Also, unless this tree's name is actually "Wildlife Tree", the name tag should be removed.
Mel_lunz (2023-10-05 04:06:12+00:00): I’ve changed it! I appreciate your input as I’m eager to learn.
Lepidobatrachus (2023-10-14 19:21:17+00:00): Не следует создавать place=locality, если уже существует объект, носящий название (как в данном случае родник). Написано в вики, в описании тега
citrula (2023-10-03 00:22:19+00:00): You might want to consider using highway=track for roads like this, if they are only used to access the farmland. Also please try to make the junctions meet in a logical manner - try not to make them meet at very sharp angles unless that is actually how they meet in real life.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142065645
Kerploonk (2023-10-02 22:57:32+00:00): Second source, https://fundur.reykjavik.is/sites/default/files/agenda-items/Tillaga%20Einstefna%20Bjarkarg%C3%B6tu%20og%20Tjarnarg%C3%B6tu.pdf
jleedev (2023-10-02 23:44:00+00:00): Looks like you already fixed it, but please try to heed the warnings; JOSM should have run the validator and yelled at you.
citrula (2023-10-03 00:15:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have changed the unclassified highway to an alley, you can read about how alleys are tagged here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=alley

highway=unclassified is used for minor public roads that are not residential streets.

Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142066034
Bobropiton (2023-10-12 17:50:30+00:00): Интересненький способ добавить 1 дерево и поломать много дорог.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-02 23:30:21+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/850480176

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-02 23:30:22+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11234827398

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Glassman (2023-10-03 17:42:22+00:00): I agree that Marine Drive doesn't go through, but according to county records, it does go part way. See https://psearch.kitsap.gov/psearch/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142066154
mfblack (2023-10-03 18:11:18+00:00): It does curve up but Marine Drive Place doesn't curve back like the parcel map shows. There's a private driveway and a cliff right there, but the terrain is hard to see in the satellite view. 

In the end, I'm really trying to show the disconnected roads properly and I'm not sure if I've achieved that. We keep having people, and trucks, get lost down here think they can loop around and there are not great spots to back up a 48 foot trailer.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142066154
Glassman (2023-10-03 18:21:28+00:00): Thanks for the info and trying to map it as it actually is.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-16 19:02:00+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11234832445/history has op=ville de Arue key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Gilles L (2024-03-16 21:26:38+00:00): It is ne name of the owner/operator of the street camera.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-18 18:18:32+00:00): then maybe

operator=ville de Arue

would be better?
Gilles L (2024-03-18 21:29:31+00:00): It was a mistake at the creation.
Thanks for your attention.
Attribute name changed
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-02 23:40:19+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11234827398

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Layft Greater (2025-02-04 15:25:48+00:00): This resolves note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2839544
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-02 23:40:18+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/850480176

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
emersonveenstra (2023-10-03 11:38:13+00:00): Hi,

Please don't tag temporary things like "Car" https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/185435301

Would you please remove this? Thanks!
Baloo Uriza (2023-10-03 12:25:41+00:00): Looks like you dragged something pretty far and it ended up behind the Homeland behind Northwest and MacArthur.  Mind taking another look?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142067338
TheKorkio (2023-10-03 22:12:05+00:00): I'm sorry, I don't see the issue your are talking about. Maybe it has already been corrected? I am new to this and apologize if I messed anything up. I promise to take better care in the future.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:43:43+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077093
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:43:39+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077091
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:43:36+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077090
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:43:33+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077088
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:43:29+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077086
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:43:26+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077083
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:43:22+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077082
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:43:19+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077081
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:43:16+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077080
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:43:12+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077077
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:43:09+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077074
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:43:06+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077073
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:43:02+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077072
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:42:40+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077068
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:42:37+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077066
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:42:34+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077065
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:42:30+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077064
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:42:27+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077062
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:42:23+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077061
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:42:20+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077059
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:42:16+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077056
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:42:13+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077054
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:42:09+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077052
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:42:06+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077050
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:42:03+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077046
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:42:00+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077045
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:41:57+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077044
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:41:54+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077043
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:41:50+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077040
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:41:46+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077038
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:41:43+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077037
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:41:39+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077034
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:41:36+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077033
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:41:33+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077032
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:41:30+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077031
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:41:27+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077030
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:41:23+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077028
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:41:20+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077026
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:41:16+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077023
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:41:13+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077020
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:41:10+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077018
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:41:07+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077017
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:41:04+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077015
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:41:00+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077012
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:40:56+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077011
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:40:53+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077008
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:40:49+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077007
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:40:46+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077006
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:40:43+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077005
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:40:39+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077004
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:40:36+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077002
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:40:33+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142077000
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:40:30+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142076998
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:40:26+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142076997
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:40:23+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142076996
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:40:19+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142076993
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:40:16+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142076992
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:40:13+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142076990
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:40:10+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142076988
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 03:40:07+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142076986