piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2024-05-12 21:50:07+00:00): Hi recalificator, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/272613202

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
NeisBot (2024-05-13 01:50:00+00:00): Hi Christopher Bell, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1282268503

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
Christopher Bell (2024-05-13 03:15:57+00:00): Website: https://www.oshawa.ca/en/parks-recreation-and-culture/lakeview-park-beach.aspx

The beach is visible on satellite, it is separated from the industrial port by a fence and is part of Lakeview Park
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-13 06:00:14+00:00): Thanks for your answer.

Looks good!

#HappyMapping
NeisBot (2024-05-13 01:53:09+00:00): Hi eGrawlix, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/way/1282268609
https://osm.org/way/1282268610

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-13 06:01:50+00:00): Thanks for your mapped beach.
Looks good!

#HappyMapping
eGrawlix (2024-05-13 20:50:51+00:00): Assuming this is referring to Crescent Beach: Crescent Beach used to be a normal sandy beach area much closer to Lakeshore Drive when the lake level was higher. As the water level dropped the area is now more of a reedbed than a beach.

That area of the lake is still named Crescent Beach even though it isn't really a proper beach anymore. 

Sandy Beach and Long Beach were also differently shaped when the lake level was higher. They both have sand brought in from other sources to maintain them as the lake level has changed so they are partially man_made.

Source: I've been visiting White Bear Lake for over 20 years. Used Bing images for placement
eGrawlix (2024-05-13 20:52:58+00:00): Oh shoot I think I've somehow broken the surrounding forest relation with this changeset. I will try to figure out what I did wrong and get it fixed up.
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-13 21:42:37+00:00): Please do not add fake features to draw on the map. This has been removed.
d_berger (2024-05-13 12:06:08+00:00): Bitte lösche keine POI, die mittels lifecycle-prefix korrekt als geschlossen markiert sind. Danke.
StreetCy (2024-05-13 14:29:03+00:00): Oh tut mir sehr leid. Ich bin noch ziemlich neu in der ganzen Geschichte mit osm
Vincent de Phily (2024-05-13 08:48:06+00:00): Looks like your editor changed "wheelchair=no" to "wheelchair=wheelchair-no" (I fixed that), and added a weird note (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4243256).

You might want to open a bug (https://github.com/organicmaps/organicmaps/issues) with some details about what you were doing.
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-13 21:45:51+00:00): Hi Aiden, you should avoid adding personal private ownership information to houses and similar features.
NeisBot (2024-05-12 22:55:07+00:00): Hi hampsto, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/node/11899547107

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-13 06:06:31+00:00): Partly reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151250852
Taktaal (2024-05-14 08:54:40+00:00): wieso eigentlich "Raiffeisenbank Zürich Flughafen"? Das ist ja recht weit weg vom Flughafen
d_berger (2024-05-14 15:45:13+00:00): Raiffeisen ist in einzelne regionale Genossenschaften gegliedert, zu denen in der Regel mehrere Standorte gehören. Dieser Standort ist in der Zuständigkeit der 'Raiffeisenbank Zürich Flughafen Genossenschaft' mit Sitz in Kloten.
SeverinGeo (2024-06-15 00:07:38+00:00): Olá, a tag fixme foi criada para melhorar a precisão das áreas provenientes de uma fonte governamental, não para excluí-las e substituí-las por um simples nó. Essa não é uma boa prática.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
rskedgell (2024-07-25 13:24:57+00:00): Maybe it does, but it still exists. Restored.
GunGoose22 (2024-05-12 23:41:53+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thank you for contributing, however please note that generally its a good idea to provide some context to what you edited and not just an emote face. So that other editors know what you edited without needing to dig into the history.

Aside from that, please also capitalize the names of places, and don't add names to places that don't have a name (I somewhat doubt "small woods" is a legitimate name). Finally, 	amenity=parking_space is meant to map the individual parking spots in a parking lot, parking lots themselves are mapped with amenity=parking.

Otherwise fairly good work here. Keep it up.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
NeisBot (2024-05-12 23:10:07+00:00): Hi zep3po, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1282287715

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-13 05:55:34+00:00): Thanks for correcting the used tag.

#HappyMapping
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 05:30:15+00:00): The user deleted her/his own fake beach.
mrpulley (2024-08-02 12:48:03+00:00): Change of maxspeed to 80 for ways 231031199 and 30433850 is correct (I've adjusted position of change of maxspeed from 60 to 80 to a little south of the junction with Claremont Drive)
SeverinGeo (2024-06-15 00:07:07+00:00): Hi, the fixme tag was intended to improve the accuracy of areas that came from a government source, not to delete them and replace them with a simple node. This is not good practice.

Olá, a tag fixme foi criada para melhorar a precisão das áreas provenientes de uma fonte governamental, não para excluí-las e substituí-las por um simples nó. Essa não é uma boa prática.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
jdmonin (2024-05-12 23:08:16+00:00): Kenney Park renamed Aug 2022 from Kenney Field: https://buffalonews.com/news/local/tonawanda-football-field-renamed-for-longtime-volunteer-and-former-councilman/article_7cb2902e-1f13-11ed-b71f-9387075f2055.html
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
yrtimiD (2024-05-13 23:07:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
Higher-level tags such as addr:city=* and addr:postcode=* are often redundant, since they could be calculated from the respective boundary relations they are contained in (if present and valid).
See more details here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:*
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
HellMap (2024-05-14 13:21:07+00:00): Sveiki,

Vienu kapsētu vairākos gabalos zīmēt nevajadzētu, jo tad te datos sanāk ir 3 atsevišķas kapsētas (ar vienādiem nosaukumiem). Tā vietā, konkrēti kapsētām, katru "apgabalu" var norādīt ar `cemetery=sector`.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dcemetery#How_to_map

Principā ceļi, kas iet caur kapsētu, ir kapsētas teritorijā.
Reinis Bērziņš (2024-05-14 18:45:25+00:00): Apvienoju 2 jaunākos sektorus vienā "Katlakalna kapi". Šī kapsēta nav digitalizēta, lai precīzāk iezīmētu sektorus. Agrāk šis ceļš iezīmēja faktisko kapsētas robežu - bija ārpus kapiem. Tagad arī otrpus ceļam izveidotas kapu vietas, bet vietējie šo ceļu tāpat izmanto caurbraukšanai. Tomēr abās pusēs ir viena un tā pati kapsēta ar vienādu nosaukumu. Ar mūri apjozto kapsētas daļu pārsaucu par "Vecie katlakalna kapi", jo tas ir pilnīgi oficiāls nosaukums. Tāpat atsevišķi atstāju arī Katlakalna brāļu kapus.
richlv (2024-05-14 19:18:14+00:00): Liels paldies par burvīgo diskusiju un kartes papildinājumiem :)

Runājot par brāļu kapiem, gribēju tik nedaudz pareklamēt potenciālus papildtagus:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cemetery%3Dwar_cemetery
mrpulley (2024-12-03 04:38:30+00:00): Confirming that maxspeeds are correct here (checked on survey)
NeisBot (2024-05-12 23:45:09+00:00): Hi italianshark, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/way/1282293863
https://osm.org/way/1187896813

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-13 05:54:21+00:00): I guess something went wrong at the following beach/building?
https://osm.org/way/1187896813

The other mentioned/mapped beach looks ok.
italianshark (2024-05-13 16:00:29+00:00): Hi :) So this is my first time and I was doing on mobile so the nodes may not be correct and I may have clicked on some extra stuff by accident. The beach is located next to Washington Lake in Washington Lake Park. This is a small lakeside beach in our park that you can bring chairs and stuff and sit by the lake. I was brought to this database as a local Pokémon Go player as my community was surprised this wasn’t registering as a beach. If you could fix it or do what ever needs to be done that would be great haha thanks
italianshark (2024-05-13 16:06:35+00:00): Yeah I see I accidentally clicked on another building and changed it to beach by accident. Thanks for spotting that.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-13 16:22:13+00:00): Thanks for your answer!

Your "accident" has been reverted, see https://osm.org/changeset/151260244

#HappyMapping
italianshark (2024-05-13 16:32:56+00:00): I appreciate it! As far as the actual beach is that fine? Just want to make sure :)
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-13 21:47:12+00:00): When adding footpaths and similar features, you should connect them to roads via crossings and other types of connections. Have you checked on the OSM wiki?
blef (2024-05-14 09:44:52+00:00): "Camping Car" is really the name of this power substation and may be identified with the tag name=xxx as it is said here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:power=substation?uselang=fr
Name source here:
https://public.joomeo.com/files/66432e5045b7a
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2024-05-14 19:36:25+00:00): Oh, sorry.
Should P16 be tagged as "ref"?
blef (2024-05-15 12:25:47+00:00): P16 is the abbreviated version of ref:FR:gdo, but as it appears on the sign identifying the post, yes, ref=P16 would be entirely justified.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
NeisBot (2024-05-13 01:10:09+00:00): Hi Virror, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/98012701

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-13 05:51:49+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151250419
KhoraKavat (2024-05-13 01:09:32+00:00): *Дудинка
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:10:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Torin G (2024-05-13 01:18:16+00:00): PGS Reclosing station is located in this Power Plant. PGS By Energex LLC.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
gpserror (2024-05-13 05:12:31+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap where contributions are always welcome.  However I don't think this is mapped properly - it surely is not a lake.  It can be changed to a private swimming pool but the location and size is not available at the moment.  Could you change this to a swimming pool and whose pool is it, there are clearly fences around all these lots, and this water is over the fences...
Allison P (2024-05-13 06:02:42+00:00): There is no swimming pool at all, it's just a Pokémon Go player vandalizing the map.
Cogwheel0794 (2025-11-02 00:33:56+00:00): I was able to get halfway down this trail before I too encountered the "no trespassing" signs. I will edit it to keep it permissive up to the point where the signs were, and private after that.
lonvia (2024-05-17 08:50:10+00:00): This changeset imports broken address interpolation lines where the house number is missing on one end of the line. I understand that this is due to tile boundaries of CanVec but still shouldn't be added to OSM in this broken state. Can you please join the discussion on https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/address-interpolation-imports-from-canvec/113119/5 what to do about this problem.
jmarchon (2024-05-17 18:50:09+00:00): Sure
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601