piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2024-02-28 17:56:14+00:00): Why did you tag this cycleway as access=no? That means no one can use it. Also, is this really a mountain bike trails? If so use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking to help you tag it correctly. Let me know if you need help.
Jordan LaCroix (2024-02-28 19:20:46+00:00): Made a mistake from learning the platform. The trail is designated and signed as bicycle only. I made a revision to fix  the fields.
arcturusss (2024-02-28 12:23:10+00:00): Are these roads named streets? Or can you point to the exact statements in wiki your decision is based on? Because it seems that you are ignoring existing local and regional mapping conventions.
Greg91 (2025-04-25 20:46:11+00:00): Only now have I seen this comment. Sorry for missing the message. I see things got ironed out since then
Taksine (2024-08-10 03:48:32+00:00): 问一下，大佬接下来还会画桂平市的其他区域吗？
blackboxlogic (2024-02-28 16:24:29+00:00): I'm glad you found the square tool. If you want to connect with other mappers to ask questions or chat, consider joining https://openstreetmap.us/get-involved/slack/ (there's a Maine channel)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147994401
mcliquid (2024-02-28 10:02:23+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
mcliquid (2024-02-28 10:02:15+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
bxl-forever (2024-02-28 13:31:56+00:00): @Olyon: To say it otherwise: please upload changes about overseas French territories separately from the mainland.

(Not to mention that it is also a good idea to split changesets about "France métropolitaine" into smaller parts, to avoid covering large parts of Belgium, Germany and Switzerland.  Your neighbours would be grateful to you for this.)
Supaplex (2024-05-29 04:03:58+00:00): Revert due to it being a fake bus station

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151969801
mcliquid (2024-02-28 10:02:06+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Supaplex (2024-05-29 03:59:20+00:00): Revert due to it being a fake bus station

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151969748
Supaplex (2024-05-29 03:59:21+00:00): Revert due to it being a fake bus station

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151969748
Udarian (2024-03-04 05:35:30+00:00): this was the old now abandoned rail line used by the FEC but does not represent the current service along that line. we already have mapped the Metrorail one of those ways is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38917326 . why did you change this from abandoned, that was there for historical reasons.
Udarian (2024-03-05 16:18:00+00:00): Please respond
Udarian (2024-03-14 22:30:45+00:00): as mentioned in my comment above the monorail (what was built on top of the old FEC alignment) has already been mapped to its current alignment. the way you removed abandoned tagging from is there for historical reasons and is not meant to represent the current alignment of the monorail.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148664466
tastrax (2024-03-01 09:50:37+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Glassman (2024-02-28 17:58:40+00:00): I'd recommend adding the gate, just add a node to the road where the gate is located. Tag it as barrier=gate. I'm guessing that the access for vehicles would be permissive.
Xvtn (2024-02-29 22:18:03+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Everything looks good to me, the only suggestion I have is to remove the semicolon in opening_hours tag. That way, data consumers can parse "temporarily closed" as a comment referring to the `closed` instruction (as opposed to being some additional instruction.) Opening_hours can be really tricky, so for interesting cases like this I'll usually use this tool to make sure I've got it right: https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=closed%20%22Temporarily%20closed%22&lat=48.7769&lon=9.1844&mode=0#

Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contributions!
nevamissmonkeyace (2024-02-29 22:26:56+00:00): That's a very useful tool, thanks! I'll update this to remove the semicolon — I wound up with that from a random Reddit thread and the OSM forum was down at the time so I wasn't able to check some other resources. The wiki explanation of opening_hours flew right over my head.
Xvtn (2024-02-29 23:28:55+00:00): Yeah, I've been mapping a couple years now and still constantly fight with the syntax. The wiki's definition is indeed way too verbose. IMO, there is a real need for a "builder" tool where you can use a gui to describe the situation and it'll create the string for you. Maybe I'll make it someday haha. Until then at least we have parsers/validators like this.
OldManCelli (2024-03-12 18:49:06+00:00): Hello Ashfusky, it looks like you possibly mistook a boundary line for a road. The way that you added a building=residential tag to was a line used as a boundary and is not a road. (270523258). If you look at the number of warnings that your changeset caused you might have guessed that you were not doing what you wanted to. I think this changeset probably needs to be reverted.
OldManCelli (2024-03-12 18:53:47+00:00): Yup - it looks like your change broke r119284 (the Fairview locality boundary line)
OldManCelli (2024-03-12 18:55:54+00:00): Ooops - I meant highway=residential. I'm going to remove this tag from the way, but the way should be reverted to how it was before to fix the relation.
ashfusky (2024-03-12 19:55:11+00:00): Thank you for pointing this out idk how I didn’t notice, I submitted a revert for it and marked it to be checked before it’s fully applied, and I was using the webeditor so it didn’t notify me of any issues that came with it
Xvtn (2024-02-29 22:00:21+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Everything seems good to me. Thanks for your contributions!
mapperue (2024-03-07 11:18:55+00:00): Hi, why this way has no tag?
openstreetmap.org/way/1255478660
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-03-01 15:58:57+00:00): Hi, you've accidentally connected Lepistiku park's footways to Tammsaare keskus. It sometimes happens, but when you save the changes, please review all the warnings before submitting. I've fixed it.
tastrax (2024-03-01 09:57:50+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
这里没有鱼 (2024-03-01 11:14:11+00:00): 错误数据已回退
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148091800
gurglypipe (2024-02-28 10:33:33+00:00): That is the name for this plantation, though, according to OS open data. How is it suspect?

I’ve re-added it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148007232
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-29 14:00:40+00:00): as mentioned, it was weirdly tagged - in such case I tend to reach out to mapper

in this their account was deleted which is a strong indicator of vandalism and I have given up on writing to them

I guess I was too suspicious - I guess that opening note instead would be better? Or writing to talk-gb

thanks for catching this and fixing it and adding it in a more proper way

I will delete less in future and will be in lesser hurry to assume that something is so invalid that it should be just deleted
gurglypipe (2024-02-29 14:43:16+00:00): Opening a note would probably be better in future, as those tend to catch the attention of active local mappers who can help out

Thanks for your efforts to clean things up :)
trigpoint (2024-03-05 20:34:59+00:00): Intrigued what was weird about the tagging?
Princess_Aurora (2024-02-29 14:02:28+00:00): Hello Jad200908;
I noticed you added new construction roads but didn't appear in any satellite images.
Examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1072807098
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1255511689
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1255493446
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1255495081
and these changes have also some streets are under construction.
Links:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147999493
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147999901
Could you please share with us the source that you used to add these streets?
Regards
Princess_Aurora
ChrissW-R1 (2024-03-16 10:48:01+00:00): https://osm.org/relation/17281903

Please check: The relation has no members
VLD549 (2024-03-28 13:18:02+00:00): Hi, could you indicate a source with a link that confirms the name change to Ambachtelijke Slager Dekimpe;AssuRaes ? I also see it is a butcher in an insurance office? It doesn't make sense, I also don't find any info on it.

Thank you!
VLD549 (2024-04-27 07:34:50+00:00): Hi, could someone indicate why the name change should be from Verweire to Verweire-Verhoeven? This dentist seems to have the name Tandartspraktijk Verweire.

Thank you!
arjunaraoc (2024-03-07 09:03:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).  

Update changes in  nearby areas (limited to a state) as a separate changeset to facilitate review
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147999927
Piskvor (2024-02-28 11:56:46+00:00): Correction: you can, it's marked Dismount though ("C14a cyklisto ved kolo") https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26284195 

Retagged.
JBacc1 (2024-11-11 18:36:21+00:00): Bonjour,
Une raison particulière pour avoir indiqué ces deux rues comme non-accessibles aux véhicules à moteurs ? En tous cas, ce n'est pas le cas aujourd'hui, et mis à part pendant les travaux, je ne vois pas quand ça aurait été le cas.
Skwaloo (2024-11-12 08:12:29+00:00): Bonjour,
Oooops, apparemment j'ai fait trop vite et me suis trompé avec le chemin à 200m au N-E...
Merci beaucoup
Glassman (2024-02-28 18:12:33+00:00): The trails were already tagged as private. What are you hoping to accomplish by adding in tags of foot, horse, bike = no? They seem redundant.
Andy Olmsted (2024-02-28 18:57:15+00:00): Bikes were not tagged prior, and pathways have been used illegally by bike races (one this past weekend).  These are private restricted footpaths not for public usage.  Perhaps they should simply be marked illegal?
Glassman (2024-02-28 19:08:53+00:00): The access=no tag is sufficient to show the paths should not be used. However, if there is still illegal usage of trails, then, ideally, the property owner should post no trespassing signs and restore the area where the trails are located. 

Park staff often use this method to keep people off what is called "informal trails".
Andy Olmsted (2024-02-28 19:11:51+00:00): OK.  then I will set to access=no.  Thank you for assistance with this matter.  For background, paths are posted with no trespassing signs by the owner.  What do you mean by restore the area?
Glassman (2024-02-28 19:18:21+00:00): By restoring the area I indended to say by removing any sign of a trail, plant the area with native plants. Even place large boulders or fallen trees across the trail.
Andy Olmsted (2024-02-28 19:18:29+00:00): I just updated. thanks
Xvtn (2024-02-29 21:59:05+00:00): Great advice by Glassman. If I may add one clarifying thing (if it's not already obvious) - the access=* tag is understood to include (and override) all other access-type tags such as foot, horse, bike, etc.
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-01 07:06:28+00:00): Здравствуйте.

Правильно "улица Гайдара", а не "Гайдара улица". Вернул всё обратно.

Прочитайте, пожалуйста, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог
gscholz (2024-03-03 07:54:29+00:00): Hi thisishowidoit,
your recent edits have left behind several errors regarding duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=53.61004&lat=28.56751&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148002154

Can you please fix this? Please do not ignore the error warnings your editor shows you (see list above).
Kind regards
Guido
eggie (2024-02-28 08:59:45+00:00): Oke... Een wandelpad, maar staat er echt een bord NL:A01-30-ZB
Dus maxspeed 30 km/u

Verder staan er eigenschappen in je tagging die er niet meer toe doen. Die kun je dus aanpassen.
Wat niet klopt is sidewalk both
verkeersbord  A01-30zb
cycleway both=no (Zal oude situatie zijn geweest)
bicycle=no (dat is default op een voetpad)


https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148002576

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2024-02-28 10:05:15+00:00): 'k Zag dat de plaatselijke wandelroutes ook een chaos waren hier. Komt niet door jou overigens. Blauw en Groen opnieuw gesorteerd. Van Oranje kan ik geen chocola meer van maken. Dat is een soort spinnenweb waar de logica ontbreekt. 
Weet jij of die routes nog wel bestaan?
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-02-28 10:06:57+00:00): https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=4823008&type=relation&map=17.0/52.767/4.6647
Robert van Beijeren (2024-02-28 10:11:14+00:00): Bij beide zijden van Plein1945 staat nu een C1 bord.
Ik wist niet eens dat deze routes bestonden, dus nee.
eggie (2024-02-28 10:38:58+00:00): Ik heb ze in ieder geval weer kloppend gemaakt. Meer voor de wandelrouteexperts.
Wonderlijk een C1 bord, want het lijkt me een voetgangersgebied.
Bij C1 vehicle=no
horse=no
Hier een hulpje voor de tagging
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden.
Robert van Beijeren (2024-02-28 10:45:11+00:00): Heeft te maken met een uitzondering voor bestemmingsverkeer/fiets aan de zijde van de Eriksstraat
eggie (2024-02-28 11:00:52+00:00): Oke...  Ik heb in ieder geval een verbinding gemaakt met de hoofdrijbaan en de oude tagging van de oude situatie verwijderd tussen nr 3 tot 19. Zie eerste opmerkingen.
Het is immers geen reguliere straat meer met trottoirs.
Denk dat het zo het meest met de werkelijkheid overeenkomt. 
Door al die paaltjes kun je er met een auto niet eens komen. 
Er staat overigens geen bord G7 oid. Je zou er dus gewoon mogen fietsen. Je zou er dus ook gewoon een highway=path van kunnen maken aan de noordzijde van het plein. 
Maar up to you.. :)

eggie
yasslay (2024-02-28 13:16:21+00:00): (Français)
Bonjour,

Si la majorité de vos modifies sont en France, ensuite gardez-les en France s'il te plaît et faire les modifies en Angleterre dans un modification séparée.

Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets pour plus d'informations.

Merci beaucoup,
yasslay

(English)
Hello,

if the majority of your changes are in France, then keep them in France please and do the changes in England in a separate changeset.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets for more information.

Thanks a lot,
yasslay
silversurfer83 (2024-03-01 09:37:06+00:00): Moin :)

warum lässt du denn den node mit "place_of_worship" nicht so, wie er war. Ich persönlich finde es gar nicht so verkehrt, das Kirchengebäude und das, was darin stattfindet, voneinander getrennt zu behandeln. So lässt sich auch viel besser trennen, wenn so eine Kirche mal entweiht wird und dann etwas anderes mit dem Gebäude gemacht wird.

Ansonsten: Gute Arbeit hier in Nordhessen in letzter Zeit. Danke :)

gruß
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148003233
surveyor54 (2024-03-01 10:50:30+00:00): Hi,
normalerweise bin ich auch dafür Shops, Arzt, o. ä.  als node einzutragen, wenn nicht das komplette Gebäude dafür genutzt wird.
Wenn ein Kichengebäude als "place_of_worship" getaggt wird, wird es auch dunkler gerendert, was hier auch Sinn macht. (Ich tagge hier nicht für die Renderer)
Auch wenn die Kirche einmal "entweiht" wird, bleibt das Gebäude immer noch building=church (Gebäudetyp).
In meiner Gegend taggen wir es halt so, wenn ihr es anders handhabt, dann sei so gut und ändere es wieder ab.

Grüße aus den Rhein-Main-Gebiet
surveyor54
Antonio 1 (2024-03-31 03:22:24+00:00): 朋友您好：
根据鸡西市官方消息以及政府网得知，G331老线仍然作为G331国道的一部分，本人曾实地考察过。另，S314查无此路（可能是规划的路线，目前没有），已改为X114。
感谢！
Hello friend:

According to official information from Jixi City and government websites, the G331 old line is still part of G331 National Highway, and I have conducted on-site inspections. In addition, S314 does not have this route (it may be a planned route, currently not available), and it has been changed to X114.

Thank you!
BG2ETV (2024-06-18 22:24:59+00:00): 您好朋友！感谢您的指正！
在第二次环评公示中指明了S314的路径。为鸡西-鸡东-二人班-密山（知一）。
Antonio 1 (2024-06-19 00:35:57+00:00): Hello friend!

We have now corrected the S314 section from Jixi to Mishan according to your suggestion, where the Jixi to Jidong section is a section of G331 and S314 that share the same line.

Thank you!朋友您好！
现已按照您的建议更正了S314鸡西-密山段，其中鸡西-鸡东段为G331与S314共线路段。
感谢！
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-28 09:50:39+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11672016953
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11672016954

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-02-28 13:24:36+00:00): Poprawione.
ratrun (2024-02-29 16:32:59+00:00): Hi!

your changes look very strange. I cannot believe that your changed tagging from waterway=stream to highway=secondary is correct. Can you please explain this change? What are your sources?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-05 00:12:46+00:00): Hi ratrun. For obvious mistakes like this that harm the map significantly please consider fixing it right away.
This changeset has been reverted in full by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148229370
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-07 15:34:17+00:00): Hello!

You used
athletics=shot-put
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/590439627/history

Have you maybe meant
athletics=shot_put
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
user_233180 (2024-03-07 18:40:16+00:00): Hey,
the correct tag is "shot-put". I don't know why ... (source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dshot-put)

shot_put: "Using this tag is discouraged, use sport=shot-put instead" 

Best!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-07 18:52:56+00:00): ops

I opened https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/1151 in attempt to fix it at the root
sannorra (2024-03-08 10:25:21+00:00): See the documentation.
athletics=shot_put
sport=shot-put

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:athletics%3Dshot_put

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dshot-put
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-08 10:38:04+00:00): Sounds like a good candidate for unification in one of directions, current state is quite silly.

Sorry for a confusion.
claudia10 (2024-03-08 12:51:06+00:00): Hello, 
thanks for the message. I actually prefer athletics=shot_put, as it seems to me to be the most common. 
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/compare/athletics=shot_put/athletics=shot-put/sport=shot-put/sport=shot_put

I must have missed that it was different here.
sannorra (2024-03-08 17:11:38+00:00): Actually, to me, the pitch looks more like high jump then shot put, don't you think?
map per (2024-03-20 19:20:01+00:00): Wegen review_requested: Alles bestens, danke für den Edit!
aTarom (2024-02-28 19:10:58+00:00): Hola, recuerda que hay un límite en el número de caracteres y cuando se suben los datos quedan solo los primeros 255. han quedado recortados los valores de description. saludos
pantufla (2024-02-29 08:16:08+00:00): Buen ojo. Gracias por siempre estar pendiente de estas cosas. Lo voy a arreglar enseguida, se me ha pasado por completo.
HellMap (2024-02-28 10:47:30+00:00): Hi!

Just wanted to let you know that local melioration and ditch system waterways should almost always be ditches (rather than streams or canals) For example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1255567865 . Generally, there are very few canals in Latvia (these are larger man-made constructed waterways, normally with built-up banks). And most streams are much longer. Unless you know there's a spring or something at the source, then it's probably not a ditch.

Thanks
Eugene G (2024-02-28 11:13:10+00:00): Okay! This makes sense to me, thank you for a clarification!
Piz Pachific (2024-02-28 10:28:55+00:00): Hi Frank314

Thanks for your 3D mappings around Flumserberg! One little thing to optimize: you could make the polygons rectangular wherever possible.

Happy mapping ;-)
Mammi71 (2024-03-01 09:14:18+00:00): Hallo ADAC,
die Schreibweise von Kiew/Kyjiw ist in OSM genauso stark diskutiert wie auf Wikipedia. 
Die Bundesregierung via Auswärtiges Amt kann die Schreibweise für Bundesbehörden und Regierungsstellen vorschreiben. OSM bildet jedoch in name:de nicht begriffsbildend gewünschte Namen, sonder deskriptiv den in der deutschen Sprache gebräuchlichen Namen ab. Hierfür gibt es durchaus auch verifizierbare Quellen (auf die auch Wikipedia Bezug nimmt). Der gebräuchliche Name (und Schreibweise) ist derzeit noch "Kiew". Für "Kyjiw" kann gern official_name:de genutzt werden.
Hinweis: das AA benutzt offiziell auch noch den Namen Pressburg, die slovakische Hauptstadt ist in OSM jedoch bereits mit dem gebräuchlicheren Namen name:de=Bratislava getaggt.
Die weitere Diskussion bitte im Forum führen
Zur aktuellen Diskussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/name-de-kyjiw-oder-wie/109713/74
dieterdreist (2024-03-01 10:23:40+00:00): Danke Mammi71, ergänzend geht es beim deutschen Namen um die deutsche Sprache, nicht um die amtliche Variante der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, es gibt noch mehrere andere Länder in denen Deutsch ebenfalls die offizielle Sprache ist, z.B. Österreich, Schweiz, Luxemburg, Italien (Südtirol). Grundsätzlich gibt
dieterdreist (2024-03-01 10:24:03+00:00): es für amtliche Schreibweisen den tag "official_name"