piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Maksim Hradaboyeu (2024-10-07 07:02:29+00:00): Added missing roads according to Esri World Imagery
#mapbox_missing_roads
KhoraKavat (2024-10-04 06:51:11+00:00): Добавление адресов, город Уяр
Oskarst_ (2025-02-04 09:36:11+00:00): Hei, ser ut til at way 1320660581 som du har laget ikke er tagget som noe, og heller ikke inngår i noen relation. Har du mulighet til å se på det?
DressyPear4 (2024-10-05 17:40:28+00:00): Olá, nomes não devem ser adicionados todo em maiúsculo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157446551
jb54osm (2024-10-04 11:24:48+00:00): Dag CartoKees,

Ooit (9-9-2024) heb ik https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=52.083427&mlon=4.408742#map=19/52.083427/4.408742 bij 'mijn' BAG aangemeld als gesloopt. Op de BAG-viewer zie nu ik het schuurtje niet meer.
Hoe kan dit schuurtje dan toch terugkeren op OSM?
CartoKees (2024-10-04 15:00:25+00:00): Hallo jb54osm,
Ik gebruik de gegevens t/m augustus. Toen was het pand nog niet gesloopt. En ik denk ook dat ik de luchtfoto van 2023 heb gebruikt om te kijken of het schuurtje er nog was. 
Ik heb het schuurtje ook maar gelijk uit OSM gehaald.

CartoKees
jb54osm (2024-10-04 19:26:10+00:00): Dag CartoKees,

Dat verklaart in ieder geval zo'n 'spookschuurtje'. 
Hoe kun je nu voorkomen dat dit blijft gebeuren: A verwijdert, B importeert, A verwijdert, ...

Persoonlijk vind ik gegevens uit augustus in oktober wel wat oud.
ObscureAngel (2024-10-07 06:01:31+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre contribution :-)

A l'avenir veuillez noter qu'il est recommandé de mettre des commentaires plus précis sur vos groupes de changements (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications)

Aussi, je vois que vous avez placé un parc au milieu d'un parking, est-ce normal ? Également, les passages pour piétons se matérialisent par un point (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dcrossing) ou un chemin (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:footway%3Dcrossing) mais pas par une zone. ;-)

Merci beaucoup, passez une bonne journée et bonne cartographie ! :-)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157446587
chloreu (2024-10-25 09:17:26+00:00): Bonjour, 
Merci pour votre commentaire, je vais le prendre en compte dans les plus bref délais. 

Bien à vous.
Kento Kei (2024-10-04 18:54:39+00:00): My man really did just do all of South Roxana, props to you!
philippec (2024-10-04 11:08:08+00:00): Kan ik daar dag en nacht bij ?
Wat is Coubertin ?
philippec (2024-10-04 11:08:26+00:00): Zijn dat echt klaslokalen ?
user_11609320 (2024-10-04 07:06:24+00:00): looking at the agenda meetings, they split it because of the brightline project north of foothill
Hunsbuckel (2025-05-19 15:25:30+00:00): Tja, es ist halt ein Weg über Felsen, welchen Weg willst Du da sehen? Die Wegführung ist eindeutig (immer schön auf dem Grat entlang) und ist sogar beschildert!
Es gibt das Tag "Sichtbarkeit des Weges", wenn ein Weg selten begangen wird und schlecht zu erkennen ist.
Jetzt muss ich alles wieder neu einzeichnen! Danke!
kawiwa (2025-05-19 16:41:37+00:00): Hey, wir sind ja echt schmerzfrei, was kaum noch zu erkennbare Pfade oder Querfeldeinlauferei angeht. Wie der Steig laufen soll, ist schon klar, aber hier war nicht nur nichts zu erkennen sondern alles auch ziemlich zugewuchert, daher hatte ich den rausgenommen (glaub mir, ich mach das nicht einfach so), da viele User bei den OSM-Karten nicht in die Tags schauen und einfach laufen.
Sorry für meinen Fehler, war net böse gemeint... :-)
Übrigens: Unsere Kids nennen solche alten und vergessenen Pfade schon automatisch "Hunsbuckel-Weg", unabhängig, ob die von Dir sind oder wir die zufällig entdeckt haben... (Dank komoot... ;-)
Hunsbuckel (2025-05-19 16:59:12+00:00): Danke für das Feedback, habe inzwischen mittels Revert-UI den Weg wieder hergestellt.
Die Wege stammen ja oft von den offiziellen Kartenwerken, aber es ist halt noch kein OSM-Kartierer dort gewesen, also schaue ich es mir vor Ort an. Und wenn es sogar eine Beschilderung gibt...
Ja, leider wachsen die Wege auch mal zu und sind im Winter besser zu begehen als zur Brombeer-Zeit.
https://www.komoot.com/de-de/tour/1008213505
Ist mir ja auch nur aufgefallen, weil ich demnächst die Wege, die dort abgehen, weiterführen möchte.
Wege, die man durch Heben der Füße begehen kann, die zeichne ich ein. Geht es wirklich nicht weiter, dann wird es zur Sackgasse gemacht.
Statt Löschen kann man wie gesagt die Erkennbarkeit oder den Schwierigkeitsgrad anpassen oder auch "abandoned" nutzen, wenn Wege unbrauchbar sind... weil sich das ja auch wieder ändern kann ;o)
Gorger (2025-02-18 03:41:31+00:00): "Hello Fikrybayu
 I have created missing buildings at way 1327767206 way 1327767207 way 1327767005 way 1327767006 way 1327767007 way 1327767008
 Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
 Happy Mapping!"
Benoît C MdP (2024-10-08 08:56:09+00:00): Bonjour Audrey

C'était quoi ta source car ce n'était pas encore rouvert ce matin ? Mais ça devrait être le cas ce soir.

Benoît
Gorger (2025-02-18 03:41:01+00:00): "Hello Fikrybayu
 I have created missing buildings at way 1327498937, way 1327501918, way 1327501919, way 1327501917, way 1327501916, way 1327501915.
 Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
 Happy Mapping!"
Maksim Hradaboyeu (2024-10-07 07:04:01+00:00): Added missing roads according to Esri World Imagery
#mapbox_missing_roads
FroschForscher (2025-01-31 21:34:34+00:00): Hallo Micael da Silva Malheiro,

In diese Changeset wurde die Dolanallee (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25674955) in einen highway=footway umgewandelt, dadurch sind die darüber angebundene Parkplätze nicht mehr mit dem Auto erreichbar.

FroschForscher
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157447360
Frans S (2024-10-06 09:18:19+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
A remark about the way high rise or multi-story buildings are often mapped 
On the imagery, you see both the roof and a sidewall (with multiple floors) 
The imagery is taken under a certain degree and shows you the height of a building.
Don't map both the roof and the sidewalls as 1 building.
Draw just the rooflines as a building and move it to the building's footprint.
See this clip.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2024-10-06 09:19:22+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
A remark about the way high rise or multi-story buildings are often mapped 
On the imagery, you see both the roof and a sidewall (with multiple floors) 
The imagery is taken under a certain degree and shows you the height of a building.
Don't map both the roof and the sidewalls as 1 building.
Draw just the rooflines as a building and move it to the building's footprint.
See this clip.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping
MxxCon (2024-10-10 20:52:41+00:00): Hello.
Why did you tag building 1320668356 as layer=-1, implying it's under ground?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157447978
Frans S (2024-10-05 08:30:43+00:00): Hello. Here you tagged a few traces as a footway.
The tag footway is to be used in dense urban areas where the path is dedicated to pedestrian.
Just tag them as path.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157448061
Frans S (2024-10-04 10:14:23+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
A remark about the way high rise or multi-story buildings are often mapped 
On the imagery, you see both the roof and a sidewall (with multiple floors) 
The imagery is taken under a certain degree and shows you the height of a building.
Don't map both the roof and the sidewalls as 1 building.
Draw just the rooflines as a building and move it to the building's footprint.
See this clip.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping
Mannivu (2024-10-05 15:58:40+00:00): Eviterei di inserire delle razed:highway dato che è impossibile vederne i rimasugli sul terreno
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157448220
Francesco Zanaboni (2024-10-05 17:18:54+00:00): Va bene,
ho inserito qualche volta delle razed:highway dove da qualche immagine aerea risulta ancora la strada, ma capisco che non sia una pratica particolarmente suggerita.

Eviterò in futuro, grazie per il feedback! :)
CurlingMan13 (2025-02-05 03:55:26+00:00): Reverted in part or full.  Low quality data that offers no information or resemblance to real world has no place on OSM.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162149299
nona mostafa (2024-10-07 13:25:30+00:00): Hello Sal73x;
I noticed you  changed the classification for the ways
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106798080
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/694162208
from "highway=primary_link" to "highway=secondary_link"
but based on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Link_roads
 it will be suitable to be "primary_link"
as this link goes to the "primary" road
Can you check it, please?
Regards
nona mostafa
Sal73x (2024-10-07 17:12:52+00:00): Hi Nona, thank you for your message. This road is part of the urban environment and not every road that leads to a primary road gets marked as prim. link. I believe that marking it as secondary link gives it the necessary importance to mark the route. Thank you again. Regards 
Sal73x
nona mostafa (2024-10-09 14:00:32+00:00): Hello Sal73x;
Thank you for your quick response, I agree with your point of view.
Regards
nona mostafa
Frans S (2024-10-15 08:02:04+00:00): Thanks for mapping. 
Please solve the issues shown by the issue triangle before you upload your mappings !
A remark about the way high rise or multi-story buildings have to be mapped 
On the imagery, you see both the roof and a sidewall (with multiple floors) 
The imagery is taken under a certain degree and shows so you see the height of a building as well.
Don't map both the roof and the sidewalls as 1 building.
Draw just the rooflines as a building and move it to the building's footprint.
See this clip.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping
cowboyxup (2024-10-07 20:59:14+00:00): Hallo EinEngener,
der Trampelpfad existiert. Wieso löscht du diesen?
EinEngener (2024-10-08 10:55:23+00:00): weil ich ohne zu prüfen vor Ort und nur vom schnellen kurzen sehen den Trampelpfad eingetragen habe vom umzäunten spielplatz aus. dann kam die Anmerkung das man über den Zaun drüberspringen muss um auf den Trampelpfad zu gelangen, wobei unlogisch ist das derjenige diesen Zaun nicht einfach in OSM einträgt ... Naja dann lösch ich ihn, um es mir vor Ort mal anzusehen. Deswegen löschte ich ihn.
CurlingMan13 (2025-02-05 03:55:48+00:00): Reverted in part or full.  Low quality data that offers no information or resemblance to real world has no place on OSM.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162149305
michel60 (2024-10-05 14:01:38+00:00): Pour voir les "gap" :
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=2.30895&lat=48.87785&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
CurlingMan13 (2025-02-05 03:52:34+00:00): Reverted in part or full.  Low quality data that offers no information or resemblance to real world has no place on OSM.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162149259
joost schouppe (2025-03-20 08:26:25+00:00): Ik heb er building=chapel van gemaakt, om dit soort plaatsen te kunnen onderscheiden van "echte kerken"
eggie (2024-10-04 09:00:01+00:00): Dag arriopolis,

Zo te zien op de luchtfoto en in de BGT omtrekgericht is er helemaal geen verbinding hier  met de sloten onderling. Op een andere plaats van een versmalling is dat ook het geval. Er zal misschien een duiker kunnen zijn. 
MVG
eggie
jb54osm (2024-10-04 10:31:55+00:00): Die node lag dan niet goed, maar zoals Eggie schreef: een stukje weiland is verdwenen. 
Eggie: is het mogelijk dat jij deze giga-octopus van weilanden en sloten in JOSM in kleinere / lossere stukken knipt? Voor mijn part in kleine tagloze lijntjes.  Dat vul ik dan wel in, want er zijn meer landbruggen hier die niet op kaart staan.
eggie (2024-10-04 10:37:43+00:00): Yep....   Had ik ook al naar gekeken. 

Een mp is deels wel mogelijk, maar hier is geschipperd met die landbruggen om het 'kloppend' te krijgen en schiet het zijn doel voorbij.
eggie (2024-10-04 10:57:25+00:00): Ik heb even die MP wat kleiner gemaakt zodat je die landbruggen weer ziet. Even kijken wat de rendering doet.
eggie (2024-10-04 11:19:00+00:00): Nog even wat foutjes eruit gehaald. Dubbel segmenten e.d. water op landuse. Den k dat het zo weer aardig klopt. 
Evt nog verder uitlijnen volgend BGT omtrekgericht
eggie (2024-10-04 11:28:34+00:00): Up to you!
jb54osm (2024-10-04 12:01:25+00:00): Dank!
Ik ga er later vandaag mee aan de slag. Ik denk dat ik een aantal van die lange vingers wel kan verknippen in iD.
jb54osm (2024-10-04 14:57:46+00:00): Met dat grote water (Goo?) losgeknipt, heb ik al het polderwater gewist en breng het geleidelijk weer terug in kleinere vlakken. Dus kan er even gek uitzien. Met F volg ik de contouren van de weilanden en is de boel daarna beter onderhoudbaar.
CurlingMan13 (2025-02-05 03:52:59+00:00): Reverted in part or full.  Low quality data that offers no information or resemblance to real world has no place on OSM.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162149261
CurlingMan13 (2025-02-05 03:51:59+00:00): Reverted in part or full.  Low quality data that offers no information or resemblance to real world has no place on OSM.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162149251
whb_revert (2024-10-06 20:20:45+00:00): Reverted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157556475
whb_revert (2024-10-06 20:20:10+00:00): Reverted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157556433
NM$L (2024-10-04 14:21:47+00:00): Please explain what is the confusion and why you do this changeset, making several relations broken and making the bounder against the actual situation?
gscholz (2024-10-05 09:29:35+00:00): Hi shalini-whiz,
this changeset has created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=79.59458&lat=9.88419&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=157449344

Can you please fix this?Kind regards
Guido
IndiaKW2Gf7rTBt5C (2024-10-05 14:48:55+00:00): There "data" are useless on OSM, merely the the geomteries that unable to represent any geographic feature.
didier2020 (2024-10-06 14:22:53+00:00): is it useless to create way with only 1 node ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1320681778
whb_revert (2024-10-06 20:19:04+00:00): Reverted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157556612
whb_revert (2024-10-06 20:20:03+00:00): Reverted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157556433
SomeoneElse (2024-10-07 10:10:32+00:00): See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/error-document-not-well-formed-while-trying-to-upload-osm-file-into-osm-server-via-https-api-openstreetmap-org-api-0-6-changeset-2345678-upload/119764/2
Lejun (2026-05-09 05:40:15+00:00): J'avais passé https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264027246/ en voie verte, c'est pas le cas ?
Alain 9-0 (2026-05-13 16:25:48+00:00): Heuhh, si ce message m'est adressé, merci , svp, d'être plus clair, c'est à dire de me dire ce que j'ai fait et en quoi ça heurte, les conventions OSM ? merci ; 
Mon souvenir est un peu ...flou; merci Alain 9-0
Lejun (2026-05-14 04:34:35+00:00): Le 31 août 2024 j'ai fait une passe sur les « pistes cyclables » de Montbéliard qui étaient en partie des voies vertes.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155999084

En traitant un signalement le 9 mai 2026 j'ai remarqué qu'une des sections en voie verte se terminait maintenant sur un `tracks`. Ce qui ne faisait pas de sens puisque reprenait directement en voie verte plus loin à l'ouest (par défaut j'ai fait la correction qui me semblait adéquate).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5283274
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264027246/history

Cette modification date du 4 octobre 2024 soit quelques mois après mon premier passage. Des travaux sur le secteur m'étonneraient beaucoup, j'aurais voulu connaître les éléments justifiant cette modification.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157449379
Strubbl (2024-10-04 12:35:09+00:00): Bitte nicht nach gutdünken die POIs verschieben. In OSM wird es so gemappt wie es vor Ort vorzufinden ist. Dein persönliches Problem mit der Scheune 27 kannst du bitte direkt mit der Organisation klären und nicht hier auf OSM!

Rückgängig gemacht mit CS
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157459097
Strubbl (2024-10-04 12:33:09+00:00): Hallo, warum hast du den Pfad hier gelöscht? Er ist im Luftbild eindeutig zu erkennen.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-04 08:51:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1160406825
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1320687919

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mashin (2024-10-06 13:37:22+00:00): Here again, you are using the "name" tag wrong. These are house numbers.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-29 05:03:03+00:00): Advertising reverted by DWG

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161882304
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 05:52:37+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165096460
dreua (2024-10-31 18:20:16+00:00): Danke :)
Filip009 (2024-10-06 20:03:42+00:00): Zdravím, kedy bola vinica zrušená?
Fullgas1 (2024-10-06 21:03:42+00:00): Ahoj, vinica je zrušená skoro 2 roky.
Filip009 (2024-10-07 04:42:39+00:00): A kríky vytrhali a teraz tam rastie len tráva? Lebo keď tam kríky ostali, tak by som to vinicou nechal, a len pridal k tomu nejakú poznámku tagom note="Vinica bola zrušená, hroznové kríky ponechané"
Fullgas1 (2024-10-07 04:46:38+00:00): Len tráva a naletová burina, žiadny vinič. Všetko vytrhali a následne zmulčovali.
Filip009 (2024-10-07 04:54:52+00:00): Okej, vďaka za info :)
Frans S (2024-10-05 08:27:11+00:00): Hello. Here you draw an empty field as a building.
You have to look for proof that it is a building, like a shadow. No shadow? no building.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157452218
Maksim Hradaboyeu (2024-10-07 09:29:35+00:00): Added missing roads and fixed road tagging according to Esri World Imagery
Jrachi (2024-10-26 09:06:57+00:00): Ciao.
Il ref dovrebbe essere una sigla unica e non una collezione.

Ivo
Marco Lapi (2024-10-27 07:21:29+00:00): Ciao, si tratta di un caso particolare. Ho inserito nei ref anche i vecchi numeri per garantire loro maggiore visibilità su Waymarked Trails, però questo sentiero ne ha diversi, essendo frutto di accorpamenti
Jrachi (2024-10-27 09:05:47+00:00): Ciao.
Grazie delle risposte.

Nel caso tu abbia bisogno di una mano:

Abbiamo aperto un canale Telegram, “OpenStreetMap Italia - OutDoor”, dedicato alla mappatura del territorio, dei sentieri e delle relazioni. Non ci occupiamo di micro-mapping o di spazi indoor, ma ci concentriamo sul completamento della mappatura delle aree naturali e degli itinerari escursionistici. Sono benvenuti i soci del Club Alpino Italiano che lavorano alla manutenzione dei sentieri, chi ama camminare in montagna e, più in generale, chi desidera contribuire alla mappatura secondo le linee guida CAI per migliorare il catasto della Rete Escursionistica Italiana (REI).
Il gruppo si trova a: [OpenStreetMap Italia - OutDoor] (https://t.me/+EmHgkjBXqw9mZWU0)
alix_geovelo (2024-10-23 08:46:57+00:00): Bonjour
est-ce que ce sont maintenant des pistes ou des bandes cyclables sur cette avenue ? Merci !
Cedric 142 (2024-10-23 09:00:18+00:00): Il y a une piste cyclable de chaque côté de la voie des autos. Celle en allant vers le sud est couplé d'un chemiment piéton de 1.50m de large séparé d'une bande de la piste cyclable.
Dodko (2024-10-04 13:44:37+00:00): čo tam predávajú?
shop=yes nedá žiadnu info

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:shop
synfarer (2025-04-08 21:18:54+00:00): Hei! building=collapsed taggen er ikke lenger gyldig. Hvis det fortsatt er synlige ruiner her, passer det bedre med for eksempel ruins:building=yes?
Kvennavika (2025-04-12 06:32:52+00:00): Da er det korrigert iht. forslag.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-10-07 07:52:27+00:00): Nếu cấm motorcar:conditional trên cả đoạn đường thì có nghĩa là 2 chiều di chuyển đều bị cấm. Hãy cấm bằng biển báo cấm oto đi thẳng theo giờ "from" - "via" - "to"
a16z (2024-10-07 08:43:10+00:00): em nắm tin nhé
NVBW_Edit_Nakaner (2025-05-28 15:13:45+00:00): Hallo,

gab es seit 2021 dort Umbauarbeiten oder wie kommst du darauf, dass https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1320704702 gebaut wurde? Uns liegen Fotos von 2021 vor, die keine solche Rampe zeigen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Frans S (2024-10-05 08:25:18+00:00): Please be more accurate when drawing alongside rooflines. You regularly just draw a rectangular, ignoring corners of complex buildings.
Quality prevails above quantity
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157454489
Robert Whittaker (2024-10-06 17:03:37+00:00): Hi Dotty1973,

In this changeset and other one made around the same time, you added two AEDs to OpenStreetMap, a few metres apart with similar descriptions:

* https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12222114701
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12222088001

I assume that there is actually only one AED outside the funeral directors here. Could you confirm this, and remove whichever one is in the wrong location?

Many thanks!
eggie (2024-10-04 11:31:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
BCNorwich (2024-10-05 06:07:08+00:00): Hello, I'm sorry to say there are a lot of mistakes that you've made in London mapping.  I've reverted all your changesets in London because they duplicated many buildings. Please do not upload like this as it's fictional and could be looked at as vandalism. 

Regards Bernard.
Frans S (2024-10-05 08:22:57+00:00): Hello.
You mapped 2 warehouses as 1 building.
You can clearly see that it are 2 buildings. Map them as 2 buildings
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157454827
dypa (2024-10-04 14:08:15+00:00): пожалуйста не удаляйте существующие объекты:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12169518176 камера существует, на столбе в сторону МСК перед въездом на заправку
Константин Гам (2024-10-04 16:32:29+00:00): Камера да, но не скоростная.
Константин Гам (2024-10-04 16:33:00+00:00): А скоростная чуть в ином месте рядом, я её нанёс на карту, её не было.
dypa (2024-10-04 17:04:08+00:00): >Камера да, но не скоростная.
откуда у вас такие данные?!

вы проверили свои данные на официальном сайте ГИБДД?
https://госавтоинспекция.рф/milestones/36193
Константин Гам (2024-10-04 20:53:34+00:00): Я глазами вчера это проверил внимательно
literan (2024-10-06 15:58:26+00:00): капсом писать названия не стоит
mavl (2024-11-13 05:46:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159076666, 159076665, 159076660 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
mavl (2024-11-13 08:02:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159079861, 159079853, 159079862 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].