piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:07:59+00:00): Can you review this and other changesets that added cycleway and change them to either path or track if you agree?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151694796
FiftyLeven (2024-05-25 18:11:44+00:00): Thanks for the feedback, I'll make that change.
NorthCrab (2024-05-23 06:20:05+00:00): If I understand it correctly, RS ISO covers also the Kosovo relation: https://img.monicz.dev/-wSdSWuNG4M (as per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Administrative_divisions_of_Serbia#Autonomous_provinces). If that's the case, In my opinion you should implement a proper fix instead of just removing data from the map and hoping for others to correct it.
thefrankbraun (2024-05-23 10:28:12+00:00): I'm sorry, these codes shouldn't have been removed. I fixed it.
NorthCrab (2024-05-30 08:26:01+00:00): Why? I am curious
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-02 00:16:36+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153433416
Myazyk (2024-05-29 10:15:02+00:00): Вважаю, що недоцільно наносити малі приватні сонячні панелі, що знаходяться на обістях людей чи дахат хат.
Це те саме, що наносити фруктові дерева або городи на подвір'ях людей.
Марія Присяжнюк (2024-05-29 11:10:08+00:00): автор прихильник мікромапінгу
tom_yorados (2024-05-22 20:28:41+00:00): Ciao wonyoung,
Please keep your changes confined to a small geographic region, this makes reviewing them (as requested here) much simpler.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Happy mapping
Metzor (2024-05-23 07:03:52+00:00): Hi wonyoung,

It is this parking amenity that makes your changeset that huge:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1285765012#map=18/48.32526/8.67602
Please commit/ upload such changes separately, then it is much easier to review your changes.

Your changeset description  is very good and helpful.

Unfortunately, you removed a service road and replaced it with a very long barrier=gate :
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1207401286
(More precisely: you removed the tags for the service road)

You can find more information on the gate  tag here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:barrier%3Dgate

And for the service road:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dservice

I cannot find up to date aerial imagery to assess if the new location of the (gate) track is correct. But I have good faith in you that this is correct.

So I fixed the issue with the gate/service road in this changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151707537

Further questions: Is there a street name?
Is the gate only opening for residents? Then one could add access=private to the gate and the appropriate part of the service road.

Happy mapping
Metzor
Udarian (2024-05-25 22:26:48+00:00): crossing:signals=no is implied on uncontrolled crossings so there’s no reason to add it to uncontrolled crossings, not having signals is the whole point of an uncontrolled crossing. It’s like adding foot=no on a highway=motorway, it’s implied.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151695864
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-23 02:58:35+00:00): Please use more detailed changeset comments.  What did you change and why?

You can read more about changeset comments and their importance here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151696186
PinRPG (2024-05-23 17:24:04+00:00): It's the conversion of golf cart routes using service roads, and changing them to paths because they don't normally support motor vehicles.
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-23 17:56:26+00:00): Awesome.  Keep up the good work!  I've been trying to get these cart paths converted from roads to paths ever so slowly.
Frans S (2024-06-14 11:51:48+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Rather inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.
Connected nodes of buildings to each other.
clustered buildings.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151696197
kidneyspr (2024-06-02 03:41:59+00:00): Verifiqué varios letreros en persona y todos dicen Ónice.  ¿Acaso tienes otra fuente donde diga Ónix?
BigKev97 (2024-08-22 19:39:06+00:00): Porque "Ónix" y "Ónice" suenan iguales. La palabra "Ónix" suena mayormente que "Ónice" al pensar que "Ónice" está mal escrito.
kidneyspr (2024-08-26 05:13:52+00:00): ¿Estabas adivinando el nombre correcto?

The street signs say "Ónice", so that's the correct name. There's no need to guess street names.
 
We can talk in English, in case it works best for you.
syncronic (2024-07-16 20:23:52+00:00): Warum löscht du meinen Weg und bezeichnest das dann als  "kleine Korrektur" ?
ChrisFromRV (2024-07-17 02:59:56+00:00): Da brauche ich schon mehr Informationen. Welcher Weg genau, das Ganze ist schließlich 2 Monate her. Zeichne ihn am besten neu ein...Sorry
syncronic (2024-07-17 11:37:37+00:00): Du hast 2 Wege gelöscht. Das ist hier dokumentiert. Wie kommst du darauf, dass die nicht mehr existieren? Hast du dir das vor Ort angeschaut? Hätte es nicht gereicht, die mit disused oder abandoned zu kennzeichnen? Gelöschte Wege kann man nur durch Revertieren des Changesets wiederherstellen.
Wanderer2000 (2024-05-25 12:39:46+00:00): Dag FSC,

De veldnummers stonden al aangegeven met de tag ref=#. Veldnummers zijn dan ook geen naam, dus de key name=* is daar niet voor geschikt. Zou je in het vervolg dus veldnummers als ref=* willen taggen?

Wanderer
FSC73 (2024-05-27 17:17:07+00:00): Dag wanderer, waarom is een veld nummer geen naam? Het is toch een aanduiding die een club geeft om er voor te zorgen dat je op het juiste veld komt, net als een straatnaam en huisnummer? Wat heeft een gebruiker van osm er aan dat er een ref nummer is die niet zichtbaar is op de kaart? Ik sta regelmatig op een voetbalveld en vind het uitermate vervelend als ik de veld nummers niet kan vinden. Dan is het fijn als die te vinden zijn op osm. Veel clubs gebruiken osm op hun website om de route aan te geven.
Wanderer2000 (2024-05-28 07:32:16+00:00): Dag FSC,
Zoals je zegt, een veldnummer is een aanduiding en dus geen naam, net als dat een huisnummer geen naam is. Daarnaast komt het voor dat clubs een veld daadwerkelijk een naam geven, bijvoorbeeld Johan Cruyff veld oid. In zo'n geval kan die naam onder de name=* tag, en blijft het veldnummer bestaan onder de ref=* tag. 
Dat je de veldnummers op een kaart wil zien kan ik me nog in vinden. Dat komt omdat Carto ref niet rendert en name wel. Maar om alleen om die reden name=* te gebruiken is taggen voor de renderer, geen good practice is. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
Als we elkaar gaan tegenwerken is dat ook niet echt nuttig, dus ik hoor graag of jij je hierin kan vinden.
Wanderer
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:10:01+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" - they will much nicer.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151696729
Jordi MF (2024-05-22 22:15:09+00:00): La normativa autonómica indica que es la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua la encargada de la toponímia oficial. Una página web de turismo no tiene ninguna vigencia legal.
Geim (2024-05-23 02:11:58+00:00): Is Banff Avenue really a pedestrian street, i.e. forbidden for cars?
Ben  Glenroy (2024-05-23 14:22:10+00:00): Both Canmore and Banff close their main streets in the summer months (usually May Long-September Long), but Banff still lets public transit through in the summer.
Geim (2024-05-23 15:09:47+00:00): Ok. Thanks for the clarification. Going there tomorrow and was checking the map. 
Happy mapping!
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:10:51+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151697873
orthocircular (2024-05-23 00:19:45+00:00): Looks good! You can always mark it as a garage or shed as well, but otherwise looks fine.
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:11:15+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151697998
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:11:42+00:00): The building should match the roof line. Please redraw this apartment.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151697998
orthocircular (2024-05-23 00:24:30+00:00): Close! Make sure that each type of navigation can navigate across the things you're mapping. Driveways are for cars, bikes, and pedestrians, so this should connect to the sidewalk (as you've done) but also the street, so that if someone wants to navigate to the house at 2830 they're directed appropriately.
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:12:07+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151698237
JeroenvanderGun (2024-05-24 13:15:05+00:00): Het einde van de autosnelwegstatus op een afrit kun je aangeven met motorway=yes (nog wel autosnelweg, voor bord G2) en motorway=no (geen autosnelweg meer, na bord G2). De hele afrit van de snelweg hoort wel highway=motorway_link te blijven.

(Ik heb je tagging nu gecorrigeerd bij afrit 23 Stampersgat, dus daar kun je als voorbeeld naar kijken.)
emvee (2024-05-25 07:40:59+00:00): Dank je voor het meekijken! Ja, ik vroeg me af hoe dit te doen.

Wat je schrijft klinkt me niet helemaal logisch maar het kan wel maar dan zou het wel ergens gedocumenteerd moeten zijn/worden. 

Zie https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/hoe-maximumsnelheid-mappen/109000/12
gendy54 (2024-07-24 10:36:07+00:00): Bonjour,

Les ajouts faits constituent des doublons. Voir: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Un_item,_un_objet_OSM

De plus, le tag n'est pas approprié car il n'y a pas d'accueil du public comme une brigade classique. Il faudrait plutôt mettre un tag police=* voir un office=government

Je supprime donc les ajouts.
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:13:16+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151698431
George Sears (2024-05-23 18:11:32+00:00): Penso si potrebbe aggiungere il nome piazza catuma comunque, in un campo specifico come loc_name, credo
daganzdaanda (2024-05-22 22:22:52+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150583983
larz86 (2024-05-22 22:25:21+00:00): Connected Kings River Dr and Landmark drive to Pyramid Highway.
mita21 (2024-08-21 16:37:53+00:00): Хоча Рішенням Харківської міської ради № 1870/15 від 25.02.2015р проспект Машинобудівників виключено з реєстру, потім Рішенням Харківської міської ради № 135/21 від 21.04.2021р. він поновлений в реєстрі та має 6 адрес (http://kh-districts.inf.ua/Doc/135_21.html).
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:14:09+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151699100
SzymonH (2024-05-24 05:44:10+00:00): Źle jest to oznaczenie zrobione. Powinno być highway=tertiary, construction=minor, access=no i dopiero bus=yes. Poprawiłem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151751495
Atlanta502 (2024-05-29 20:12:02+00:00): Dzięki, na przyszłość będę dokładniej szukał informacji jak tagować takie przypadki
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:14:26+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151699228
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:14:36+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151699253
billykerman (2024-05-23 00:18:38+00:00): As you requested a review, I have looked at this and it doesn't look suspicious. Thank you.
Baloo Uriza (2024-05-23 16:50:07+00:00): Dang, how long is that creek?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151699342
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:15:09+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151699364
daganzdaanda (2024-05-22 23:07:14+00:00): Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150579765
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:15:33+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151699426
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-24 02:21:52+00:00): Reverted. Please don't delete features
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151699472
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-24 02:26:56+00:00): Please don't add fake features
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151699472
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:18:12+00:00): #TIP: square bldgs by selecting the outline then just type a "q" they will look more professional.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151700044
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:19:29+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151700044
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:23:17+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. But try to draw the building closer to the actual roof line
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151700077
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:23:49+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151700120
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:19:53+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151700126
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:20:02+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151700151
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:24:03+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151700194
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:20:34+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151700317
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:20:54+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151700332
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:21:16+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151700360
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:21:45+00:00): OSM spells out street names. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151700360
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:22:02+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151700383
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:26:32+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151700472
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:26:56+00:00): You added duplicate business info.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151700472
arctic-rocinante (2024-09-01 02:54:13+00:00): Hi there!

Just wanted to check how confident we are about access to the Showgrounds being restricted outside of paid events. 

I suspect it’s not quite that strict, as there’s a free & unticketed “farmer’s market” hosted there most weekends:
https://adelaidefarmersmarket.com.au/visitor-info/getting-to-market/

I’m less sure what the rules are when there aren’t *any* events on (ticketed or otherwise). In practice the gates usually seem to be open, and it’s not uncommon to see people walking through, exercising their dogs on the arena, etc.

I’ve also not noticed any signage that indicates access is restricted, though it’s quite possible I’ve missed some.

Basically, I guess I’m wondering if “permissive” access would be more accurate here?

Thanks!
Sam Cate (2024-09-01 03:43:13+00:00): Hi There.

Looking into the market you are right permission should be classed as permissive.
I honestly didn't think they opened the grounds up for free entry as whenever i have been passed there has always been a event on or just closed up.
Thank you for the info, always good to learn of new spots to explore.
arctic-rocinante (2024-09-01 08:20:38+00:00): No worries, and thanks for the quick reply!
Xanadu_Contractor (2024-05-28 17:58:39+00:00): Thanks!
osm_documentspace (2024-06-25 09:52:20+00:00): this is a comment
osm_documentspace (2024-06-25 09:52:38+00:00): another comment.
nevw (2024-05-23 09:08:28+00:00): Hi, I noticed that cinnema should be Cinema.
Is this cinema still in operation?
On google street view it appears as a private business selling antenna and satellite dishes. We do not have permission to use Google to assist in editing osm so can’t make changes based on that.
There is no Mapillary imagery either.
This document seems to state the Rainbow Cinema in Clermont closed in the 1960’s
https://www.caths.org.au/venues/pdf/qld.pdf
Are you local to the area and able to clarify?
If closed and is of significance, maybe add the tag historic=yes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic
dsmit2342q1 (2024-05-24 00:33:19+00:00): yes i am a local it is closed ill add the historic tag now
nevw (2024-05-24 05:39:32+00:00): I added disused=yes to the cinema.
I mapped the building to make it easier to add a node for any business operating there.
tastrax (2024-05-23 07:48:20+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features 

To get the + symbol on a mobile device numeric keypad you may need to do a LONG press on the zero.
I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
citrula (2024-05-23 08:18:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Please don't make edits for the purpose of playing a game. natural=wood should not be placed indiscriminately over houses and neighborhoods

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151710115
itsgonnabesick (2024-05-23 03:35:45+00:00): I'm sorry but I was way off. The beach is actually where you can see construction on the satelite images. Don't know how to cancel this or make changes to it.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-23 05:57:10+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151703088
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-30 08:33:55+00:00): There is no street-level imagery inside the roads. The building node needs to be modified. #OMGuru
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151702917
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-28 17:08:24+00:00): The building polygon needs to be fixed. Thanks for your contribution. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151702970
KiloThree (2024-05-25 01:07:55+00:00): Curious: why map the bike lanes on washington as cycle paths? I don't really understand mapping buffered bike lanes separately, given they are still on the road, unlike say the DPDW path, where it's fundamentally a separate way, and it's also confusing to me where the cycle path is switching back to being part of Washington street and then going back to separate
andriu44 (2024-06-08 05:20:21+00:00): They describe the configuration of the roadway much more in line with what's there on the street. There's also more tags that can be added as to surface conditions in the bike lane that would not work if it was "just" tagged.
KiloThree (2024-06-09 13:07:06+00:00): But washington has an on street bike lane. It's not a cycle way. Generally these have been less tagged than the original tags on the road described, they're not describing the on street nature of buffered lanes, and the tagging standard for cycle way is an off street path
andriu44 (2024-06-14 13:59:44+00:00): The OSM wiki page indicates that "on-street" bike lanes that are protected, separated, or qualify as Class IV bike lanes can be mapped using separate cycleways. Class IV bike lanes are separated by any kind of physical barrier even if at street level/on street.
KiloThree (2024-06-14 14:17:30+00:00): My point is that mapping this as a separated cycleway while deleting the tags from the road: 1. removes information (notably, that this is buffered, and not grade or hardscape separated) and 2. is strange for routing

Could you point me to where you see those guidelines on mapping as separate cycleways? Based on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle and the cycleway disambiguation page, I would still only see hardscape or grade separation as suggesting separate mapping
andriu44 (2024-06-16 02:00:45+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway#:~:text=A%20cycle%20track,%5B1%5D.

Link to Class IV bikeways defines the the separation as "includ(ing), but is not limited to, grade separation, flexible posts, inflexible posts, inflexible barriers, or on-street parking."
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-28 17:06:32+00:00): The actual building roof is larger than the polygon. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151703004