piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-03-13 11:27:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13645030137 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Azienda agricola"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-21 17:33:18+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179810512
NeisBot (2026-03-13 11:27:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/6735202442 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Audi concesionario"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-21 17:33:19+00:00): 👍 Thank you for removing the text by https://osm.org/changeset/179806186
eggie (2026-03-13 11:52:59+00:00): Dag Bakker Joop,

Netjes gedaan zo.
Mapse,
eggie
eggie (2026-03-13 11:54:54+00:00): Heb alleen wel die MP relatie eraf gegooid. Dat zal wel iets van editor iD zijn omdat je de polygoon had onderbroken.
notmyproblem1 (2026-03-13 11:36:35+00:00): I confirm that, this edit 179805562, was made by me with JOSM

and also; I will continue this afternoon to fix addr:city and things like that
LordGarySugar (2026-03-17 17:54:37+00:00): Why was it necessary to remove all the buildings that were added? This seems a bit heavy-handed when the problem is with the uprn and postcode imports, not the actual building geometry. Would it be acceptable to do a partial revert to replace the buildings, without any uprn or postcode tags?
trigpoint (2026-03-21 16:16:55+00:00): Possibly but the original request was also to produce smaller changesets as we are receiving cries for help from  overwhelmed local mappers, so he came back with this monster.

A partial revert would have been more time consuming and problematic than the script revert. This can always be reverted after the right responses.

Cheers Phil
LordGarySugar (2026-03-21 18:03:05+00:00): Makes sense, thanks 👍
philipcullen (2026-03-22 19:04:32+00:00): I had intended to split this the initial changeset, but had left the "auto close" setting in JOSM off in error, so they all ended up in one large one.

I'd be more than happy to split them out, but my understanding is that it is not just the size of individual changsets, but their aggregate volume that concerns local mappers, so I wouldn't want to jump in and do that if it wasn't welcome.

(I'd also need to work out how to do that, but that's a lesser problem)
trigpoint (2026-03-23 13:43:32+00:00): Thank you Philip
In future it would be a good idea if importing uprns was done in separate changesets to adding/improving  buildings and roads and keep these to a reasonable size.
I can see that this one was a mistake but its important to check settings, although in josm for me unticking close is the action I occasionally need, it is never the default.
Cheers Phil
NeisBot (2026-03-13 11:42:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1488560958 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Audi concesionario"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Concesionario Audi"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-21 17:33:19+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/180058291
silversurfer83 (2026-03-13 19:57:53+00:00): Moinsen :)

Lass mich raten: Dass sind Mitarbeiterladestationen? Dann bitte dringend access=private hinzufügen, damit nicht versehentlich jemand denkt, da wär was zu tanken ;)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179807135
GenGap (2026-03-13 20:45:59+00:00): Hi, naja, es müsste jeder dort laden können. Die Karten werden nicht vom AG ausgegeben. Aber ja, sollte keine öffentliche Tankstelle geben. Habs auf privat geändert
Gene Judd6 (2026-03-13 13:48:59+00:00): To mueschel - Hi, please do not delete our records, the emails are not one-time, we monitor them all. We prefer separate account per location. Thanks.
grzegorz75jan (2026-05-25 17:39:49+00:00): To że coś dodajesz to dobrze i edytujesz od nie dawna ale umówmy się że zaczniesz trochę więcej czytać pomoc edytora do obiektów czyli Wikipedię.

Zbiorczo do paru edycji.
W okolicy ulicy Romanowicza dodałeś ciągi pieszo rowerowe ale brakło znacznika segregated yes/no

Do sklepu Stokrotka dodałeś brand: wikipedia ale brakło wersji językowej a masz to wyłożone kawę na ławę https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:brand:wikipedia.

Coś zmienisz w swoim edytowaniu i zaczniesz odpowiadać na komentarze oraz poprawiać po sobie (do dziś np. leżą naciapane puste węzły) lub trzeba będzie zacząć wycofywać te zmiany.

Weź pod uwagę, że inni też mają co robić i mogą coś poprawić ale gdy jesteś czynnym edytującym to dlaczego ktoś ma ciągle po tobie poprawiać. Na mapie leży wiele rzeczy do poprawienia a każdy też chce edytować swoje a poprawianie większej ilości błędów po kimś jest zniechęcające.

Wybór po twojej stronie. W pewnym obszarze widzę wszystko ponieważ używam odpowiednich narzędzi do monitorowania i jest tego tyle, że nie ma opcji by samemu wszystko poprawić więc wycofywanie zmian jest najskuteczniejsze i to podwójnie ponieważ usuwa błędy oraz często dobitnie pokazuje adeptom edycji czy chcą faktycznie edytować.
Tatfahren (2026-03-13 16:29:49+00:00): Was meinst du mit "maps"?

Außerdem: für die Quelle gibt es im id-editor ein eigenes Feld, da wo du diese hineinschreibst gehört eigentlich eine Zusammenfassung hin was du geändert hast.
reki (2026-03-15 17:41:10+00:00): Ich habe die Karte benutzt "Saxony shaded ground."
NeisBot (2026-03-13 12:42:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/894550347 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Concesionario Suzuki"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Concesionario Suzuki"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
dcapillae (2026-03-13 13:32:42+00:00): Hola.

He revertido los cambios. Hay un edificio definido por un multipolígono que realmente existe.

No sé qué quiso hacer aquí. ¿Añadir un establecimiento? Si me da más detalles, quizás pueda ayudarle a añadirlo al mapa.

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
Grupo Safamotor (2026-03-24 07:40:20+00:00): Hola,
Lo que es todo el cuadrado del polígono, pertenece al Grupo Safamotor, pero dentro hay instalaciones cada una con una marca diferente.
dcapillae (2026-03-24 08:28:33+00:00): Hola.

Gracias por comentar.

Hay dos polígonos: uno corresponde al edificio y el otro al área exterior.

El edificio está correctamente etiquetado. En cuanto al polígono exterior, si se trata de la sede principal del Grupo Safamotor —donde se encuentran sus oficinas centrales y algunos de los concesionarios del grupo—, podríamos etiquetarlo como «office=company» en lugar de «shop=car».

De este modo, el polígono exterior representaría la sede central del Grupo Safamotor. Actualmente está etiquetado como si fuera un concesionario más, en lugar de un grupo que engloba varios concesionarios.

Dentro de este polígono, cada concesionario individual podría representarse como un nodo etiquetado como «shop=car», tal como está ahora.
Grupo Safamotor (2026-03-24 08:54:27+00:00): Buenas, 
sí perfecto eso justo queremos hacer.
Gracias por la ayuda.
dcapillae (2026-03-24 13:29:03+00:00): ¡Corregido! 
Cracias por su colaboración.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-24 14:06:45+00:00): 👍 Thank you!
muralito (2026-03-13 18:39:24+00:00): Hi. Why did you change wikipedia links o foreign language?
VictorIE (2026-04-12 09:43:04+00:00): Hi,

Several buildings in The Rose Garden have roof:levels = 0,5 - that's a comma.
LateNightTone (2026-04-12 18:59:21+00:00): Thanks for that! Must have made the mistake once and then copied them over. Now fixed :-)
olo81 (2026-03-16 05:53:30+00:00): Szerokość drogi to nie to samo co ograniczenia prawne :/ 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:maxwidth?uselang=pl

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:width

Do poprawy.
olo81 (2026-03-16 05:55:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/790665995/history#map=19/50.410261/19.052371
IvanaŠokčević (2026-03-13 13:19:42+00:00): Changed hgv tag from no to destination based to signage; fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179810769 #OptimoRoute
kubzon7 (2026-03-14 19:06:39+00:00): Jeżeli jest tylko ruch wahadłowy na Żwirki i Wigury, a nie jest zamknięty ruch na wprost to jest źle oznaczone. Proszę zobaczyć, że nawigacja kieruje objazdem Jaskółczą, Kossaka, Grobla, Skorupki co jest błędem (https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_car&route=53.11083%252C17.971369%253B53.110063%252C17.971959#map=16/53.11050/17.97580)
kubzon7 (2026-03-14 19:07:35+00:00): Poprawiony link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_car&route=53.110788%2C17.97138%3B53.110031%2C17.971986#map=16/53.11050/17.97580
Kees 59 (2026-03-14 10:28:09+00:00): Het is in Nederland gebruikelijk om de POI te combineren met de adres node, daarom heb ik de POI data verplaatst naar de adres node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179848207).

P.S. Ik zag dat je de ele key had gewijzigd in floors. Als dit gaat om het aantal verdiepingen dan is floors niet de gebruikelijke key daarvoor (wereldwijd slechts een paar honderd keer gebruikt en niet gedocumenteerd op de wiki) gebruik in plaats daarvan buildings:levels (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels).
marczoutendijk (2026-03-18 19:55:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import
Natfoot (2026-03-13 23:01:41+00:00): looks like you deleted the lit=yes . did street lights get removed?  also the check date rather than being removed can be left just update it to the date in which you last checked it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179811259
Henry572 (2026-03-14 07:52:26+00:00): Thanks for the quick response! Looks good.
marczoutendijk (2026-03-18 19:55:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import
pitfire (2026-03-14 05:53:49+00:00): Hi harpseditor42,

Ihr Datensatz "179812208" wurde zurückgesetzt. Begründung: Incorrect address assignment and building type
marczoutendijk (2026-03-18 19:55:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import
Pan (2026-03-15 22:32:19+00:00): Bonjour et bravo pour cette nouvelle contribution. Chouette initiative. Cependant, je ne suis pas certain qu'OSM soit prévu pour héberger des données temporaires de manifestations. 

"Ne cartographiez pas les événements temporaires". https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Ne_cartographiez_pas_les_%C3%A9v%C3%A9nements_et_%C3%A9l%C3%A9ments_temporaires
NeisBot (2026-03-13 14:05:22+00:00): Hi Cherif Lakaf, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 95% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 30 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179812663
olo81 (2026-07-14 14:06:46+00:00): Dlaczego zamykasz coś, czego nie jesteś pewny?
marczoutendijk (2026-03-18 19:55:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import
eggie (2026-03-13 14:37:37+00:00): Lijkt me oke.. Zie in het bordenbestand van de overheid ook geen verkeersbord
https://wegkenmerken.ndw.nu/kaart/verkeersborden/951183fe-e560-499b-aba5-669d6fc82d8f?zichtbaar-gebied=5.25366,52.08452,5.26521,52.08988&maxsnelheidfilter=1f5451a0.________Dw&verkeersbordfilter=47f8f896._____________________________________________98&kaartlagen=SPEED_LIMIT,TRAFFIC_SIGN,TRAFFIC_SIGN_DRAFT,BRT

Groet
eggie
NeisBot (2026-03-13 14:09:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13645323945 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cabinet médical urologie"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : "Cabinet médical urologie"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-21 17:33:20+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180218646
(Delete spam tags. First version)
marczoutendijk (2026-03-18 19:55:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import
iandees (2026-03-13 14:49:14+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
iandees (2026-03-13 14:49:44+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
GerdP (2026-03-26 19:29:00+00:00): Hi!
Please don't delete the tag network:type=node_network. It is important for the tagging of node networks. I've restored it here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/836064885 and for another node where I thought it happened accidentially. You may have deleted it elsewhere?
streckenkundler (2026-03-26 20:39:32+00:00): Ach die Aufgabe ist es: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/40185
Ja, @GerdP , du hast meine volle Unterstützung!

Sven
B252697 (2026-03-13 14:21:53+00:00): Official source for latest map from NParks (Singapore National Parks Board): https://juronglakegardens.nparks.gov.sg/files/Maps%20and%20Trails/Jurong_Lake_Garden_Brochure.pdf
marczoutendijk (2026-03-18 19:55:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-03-13 18:23:15+00:00): Hello, why did you randomly disconnect numerous road and bus routes at the Las Vegas Boulevard and Craig Road intersection? SR 604 and 573 meet at that intersection according to the NDOT's list of state-maintained highways. RTC Routes 113, 603, and 604 also use that intersection, according to the RTC's official website.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179823665
Dawid2849 (2026-03-13 14:28:05+00:00): + naprawa ślepego tertiary
NeisBot (2026-03-13 14:36:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1488609491 v1 | 7 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179814004
marczoutendijk (2026-03-18 19:55:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import
NeisBot (2026-03-13 14:42:22+00:00): Hi Cherif Lakaf, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 90% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 28 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179814381
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-24 03:06:10+00:00): Removed near-identical SEO POI "Bone Dry Commercial Roofing" (1F1E), node 13597834398 , and fixed remaining malformed/SEO tagging for POI in changeset 186270652

https://www.osm.org/node/13597834398

https://osm.org/changeset/186270652
StC (2026-03-13 21:13:02+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.

Par ailleurs, des commentaires avec un peu plus d'information seraient appréciés. Ce commentaire-ci n'en contient pas du tout.
marczoutendijk (2026-03-18 19:55:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import
felipeeugenio (2026-03-13 18:19:45+00:00): Hello. In JOSM you can round objects with the O key.
Please do the right thing and shape the silos to look like silos.

I´ll try myself tomorrow.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179815040
Dimitar155 (2026-03-13 21:07:14+00:00): Тук е станало голямо дублиране :). Вижте колко "P"-та излизат на картата.
Mister Kanister (2026-03-13 15:00:36+00:00): vgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66004703
marczoutendijk (2026-03-18 19:55:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import
flex16 (2026-03-14 06:36:08+00:00): Hi,

laut dem Netzknotenplan des Landes Hessen verläuft die K69 da nicht mehr.
Vgl. https://mobil.hessen.de/sites/mobil.hessen.de/files/2024-08/dnk_region_osthessen_sued_2024.pdf

Außerdem erfasst man Straßennummern mit ref und nicht mit name.

VG
WUSCH1463 (2026-03-14 08:46:25+00:00): Vielen Dank, flex16 - ich habe es wieder entfernt. 
VG WUSCH1463
LySioS (2026-03-20 18:14:20+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour ces ajouts.

En ce qui concerne les étoiles des resto, hôtels, elles ne se rajoutent pas dans le nom mais dans une valeur spécifique.
Dans l'éditeur en ligne, il faut descendre dans la partie de gauche jusqu'à arriver à la table attributaire et rajouter :
"stars" et renseigner le nombre
Perpignan Mediterranee Tourisme-Rivesaltes 1 (2026-03-23 08:54:48+00:00): Bonjour, ok, c'est bien noté! Merci pour la précision.
marczoutendijk (2026-03-18 19:55:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import
marczoutendijk (2026-03-18 19:55:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import
marczoutendijk (2026-03-18 19:55:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import
kucai (2026-03-15 08:06:45+00:00): Since when do they have this slip road? It doesn't make sense at all.
ItsDurian (2026-03-15 08:34:58+00:00): Its recently opened https://www.facebook.com/reel/1232939292381958
kucai (2026-03-15 08:41:20+00:00): holy shit. I've been thru there so many times but didn't realize they have that thing under construction (still don't make sense $$ wise unless KL east is paying ). I'll correct the layout geometry after this.
kucai (2026-03-15 09:27:25+00:00): one more thing, it would help to put "note= newly opened on dd/yy" if the feature doesn't show on any osm approved aerial imagery.
AndersAndersson (2026-04-04 22:12:23+00:00): What did you do here and most importantly, why?
* You deleted the new service road (1423865502). It is still there.
* You deleted the ridge (1246175434). I'm quite sure it is still there.
* You deleted the snowmobile path (33763310). Do you know it's not there any more?
* You deleted the shortcut (64156479). It was there a year ago. Do you know it's gone now?
Jorisbo (2026-04-12 07:13:57+00:00): Hello AndersAndersson, Thx for your reply! If i remember correctly there where snowmobile paths and informal shortcuts added as highway=path making them routable for pedestrians and cyclists where these routes in most cases are only visible/usable in snow time.  piste:type=snowmobile or piste:type=snowshoe / nordic in combination with the uses of ice_road =yes / winter_road = yes are more appropriate and make them nicely available on winter and skiing maps.  I did not double check for this situation but snowmobile tracks are often just strava-like gpx uploads. But... feel free to change anything to your best intentions. Kind regards, Joris
AndersAndersson (2026-04-13 21:43:57+00:00): A snowmobile path can be a normal path in the summer. You should not change that if you have no idea how this particular path is.
You forgot to mention why you removed the ridge and the new service road. And why you deleted a snowmobile path and a path (you could have just added informal=yes).
Here you can see your changes. Please respond.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=179817543

Of course I can add the information a second time. But how do I know that you will not remove it again?
Changes like yours makes contributing to OSM pointless.
marczoutendijk (2026-03-18 19:55:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180077000 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undocumented import
LySioS (2026-03-20 18:21:00+00:00): Attention, l'hôtel était déjà présent. Rajoutez les infos aux points déjà présent. Je fusionne le doublon
Perpignan Mediterranee Tourisme-Rivesaltes 1 (2026-03-23 09:03:09+00:00): Idem remarque précédente - c'est bien noté. Merci.
Bienson (2026-03-13 22:55:27+00:00): Kein barrier=gate, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:barrier und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier%3Dswing_gate
Bienson (2026-03-13 23:00:06+00:00): Oder auch:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier%3Dcycle_barrier
burrscurr (2026-05-06 12:04:55+00:00): Hallo mikr2019,

du hast in diesem Änderungssatz den name= der Kreuzung Louisenstraße / Görlitzer Straße geändert. Im Allgemeinen ist der name-Tag für den "gebräuchlichen Eigenname" vorgesehen (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen). Inwiefern ist aus deiner Sicht an dieser Stelle "Sozi-Eck" angemessener als der vorher gesetzte name= "Assi-Eck"? Ich bin offen dafür, dass Sozi-Eck ggf. ein alt_name oder local_name sein könnte, aber an der Verwendung als name= habe ich Zweifel.

VG
burrscurr