piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ManuelB701 (2024-07-11 20:36:28+00:00): Gut, das ist schon mal erledigt.

Außerdem habe ich beim Fahrplan nochmal nachgeschaut und anscheinend sind deine eingetragenen Routen tatsächlich echt und ersetzen nicht die existierenden.

Was meine Verwirrung unterstützt, ist, dass die Varianten mit gleichen Start- und Ende keine wichtigen Zwischenhalte zur Unterscheidung haben (z.B. Bad Kreuznach Bahnhof ↔ Schweppenhausen Gasthaus Pfalz fährt an Wochentagen über Rüdesheim und über Hargesheim an Wochenenden, haben aber keine via-Halte).

Letzten Endes ist es schon beeindruckend, die ganzen Variationen der Strecke zu sehen, wenn man bedenkt, dass Schülerverkehre allgemein nicht aufgezeichnet werden.
jhaluska80 (2024-06-12 20:54:33+00:00): Why are all your changeset descriptions single periods?
TeroToc (2024-06-13 22:41:33+00:00): Because I see no value in adding changeset descriptions.
Udarian (2024-06-30 20:11:56+00:00): Changeset comments are useful to allow others reviewing change set to understand what happened in the commit and promotes trust. They are also just community consensus best practice. All commits are public so its good to have good descriptions for what each commit for the same reason change set comments are used in other VCS’s, allowing for changesets to be easier found when trying to track down an issue and when it was introduced. For more information please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.
TeroToc (2024-07-05 00:08:55+00:00): I disagree.
Jordi MF (2024-06-12 19:25:31+00:00): Eliminades traduccions de parades de transport públic que no tenen ús
Lezurex (2024-06-13 07:05:25+00:00): Hallo Physiotherapie Levie,

Vielen Dank, dass Sie sich in OpenStreetMap eingetragen haben!

Beim Website-Feld haben sie eine E-Mail-Adresse angegeben. Ich habe das für Sie korrigiert und Ihre Website hinzugefügt.

Freundliche Grüsse
Lezurex
McKulkin (2026-04-03 01:05:01+00:00): Good news! Segments 1192798405 and 1282129674 are half impassable. Especially the last one - at the southern end - is heavily wooded with young (5-10? years old) trees. They're so dense it's impenetrable. We had to get off the trail into the forest in order to bypass that "wonderful" segment. I'm unsure why the adjacent path is marked as `good` because there was nothing good about it. The next one is marked as `intermediate` but I don't understand how fallen trees and general chaos can be marked as anything but "horrible".  
node 11328937178, on the other hand, is where something resembling a truck road started to appear, which became much better further down the line.

I'm about to remove the problematic segments and fix up the ones that are going to be retained. This will break the continuity of the east-west connection, but at least it will provide explorers an up-to-date information on what to expect from that area.
McKulkin (2026-04-03 01:12:20+00:00): Those  `horse=no`, `bicycle=no` tags, why not `mtb:scale`? Also, it's high insanity to even try to ride an mtb there.
McKulkin (2026-04-03 01:17:09+00:00): Will try to pull up some photos & gpx tomorrow.
McKulkin (2026-04-06 00:59:14+00:00): Good news! The phone that was supposed to bear recorded tracks around that area was erased 3 months ago (no backups, obviously). I've got some photos, though. https://foxly.me/gt8MXu
Knowledgeable person says that  the riverbed hasn't seen water for several seasons. Other 2 photos of the same place that you marked as carrying a stream. Disregard the droplets - they are just from the rain.
nikyk (2026-04-06 11:21:31+00:00): I was there in May 2024.
Perhaps something has changed since then.
Please, if possible, don't remove overgrown paths, just add prefix "abandoned:" to key "highway" (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned:*)
It is useful if someone will try to draw this route one more time, based on old gps tracks
Also add the reason: obstacle=vegetation
nikyk (2026-04-06 11:26:04+00:00): As for horse=yes, bicycle=no, I never use those tags. Look history of edits and find person who added them. Those tags are useless for forest trails in mountains
McKulkin (2026-04-06 20:10:46+00:00): Thanks for the insights. You (and we) were probably looking in the wrong places. The truck road 825785938 has many forks which haven't been mapped. I bet one of those has a connection to Balda-Gordi truck road.
eggie (2024-06-12 20:20:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  monument heb ik aangepast naar memorial.  Een monument is iets anders vertaald vanuit het Engels.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Memc (2024-06-12 20:48:56+00:00): Kan beide!!!!!!
A monument is a type of structure that was explicitly created to commemorate a person or event, or which has become relevant to a social group as a part of their remembrance of historic times or cultural heritage, due to its artistic, historical, political, technical or architectural importance.
Examples of monuments include statues, (war) memorials, historical buildings, archaeological sites, and cultural assets. 

MVG,
Memc
eggie (2024-06-12 20:52:56+00:00): Oke.. maar een historic=monument is bv de TaijMahal. 
Het is meestal een gebouw en vaak een graftombe.
Een monument.. dus Gedenkteken.. Denkmal.. wordt in OSM Nederland getagd met memorial.
Mvg
eggie
jmapb (2024-06-12 20:43:02+00:00): (changeset comment should have said "add address")
Andrew Chadwick (2024-09-06 14:56:13+00:00): Thanks for keeping it up to date.

https://www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/news/2023/part-a509-be-closed-monday-25-september-2023 says the job should be finished now, but live bus data https://bustimes.org/services/x5-bedford-milton-keynes#map says otherwise, but the bus Co.s uploading their routes to the public source bt.o use may not have updated it yet.

Do you know if it's finished yet?

OSM has the X5 route going along London Road, not the alternative route via Willen Road. I might reinstate it along London Road if it's due to finish up and go back to the way it was.
Falsernet (2024-09-06 16:35:38+00:00): Hi there

I made the edit primarily because someone deleted the road completely as if it didn't exist when really it was just under long term closure. It looked more like a mistake than a road closure so luckily I did my research before just readding it blindly.

I gave the first link a skim, and to me it says it opens on the 27th of this month, which will be a few weeks. Either way in fairness, it's possible the bus company might be slow to catch on.

I'm not local to Milton Keynes, and by the sounds of it neither are you, but if you're confident it's reopened then feel free to change highway=construction to trunk and delete the construction tag.

Cheers,
Sam
rab (2024-06-14 20:51:50+00:00): Hi wallacegara,
there are several bridges mapped by you that are not visible on bing. Is this local knowledge or did you do it  to avoid warnings?

I am asking because these two roads are certainly not correct

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291888933
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291888932
wallacegara (2024-06-15 11:25:58+00:00): It was based off  local knowledge  because  I stay there
rab (2024-06-15 11:51:24+00:00): ah,
thank you for the reply.
But with the two ways mentioned above something went wrong. They are following the outer way of a residential polygon and are also part of the relation. Do you want to fix this by yourself?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17666969
The area will show up again after this ways are removed from the relation and from OSM. 
Yesterday I straitened the foot ways around the CUT Hostels. Is this ok.
ChristophKiel (2024-06-21 19:26:57+00:00): Moin, 

danke für deinen ersten Beitrag bei OSM. Ich hoffe, es kommen noch viele weitere von dir :)

Mir ist allerdings bei deiner Änderung etwas aufgefallen: 
Du hast "cycleway=lane" hinzugefügt, obwohl schon "cycleway:both=lane" vorhanden ist. Die Daten sind nun doppelt und das "cycleway=lane" ist überflüssig.

Aber lass dich dadurch nicht aus dem Konzept bringen. Das kann man alles wieder ändern ;)

Falls du Fragen hast, kannst du mich auch gerne anschreiben.

LG
Christoph
4004 (2024-06-15 23:07:41+00:00): ну а тут я точно не согласен - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Drest_area это место отдыха у авто дороги, а не просто любая территория где можно отдохнуть.
если там скамейки или беседки, их и стоит обозначать
4004 (2024-06-15 23:11:01+00:00): 
нейм вешается на здание вокзала, есле у вокзала есть имя собственное - иначе достаточно станции https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:building%3Dtrain_station
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 19:01:01+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/804147892/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit
What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then?
flex16 (2025-12-18 21:35:45+00:00): Actually, I didn't add the fixme=yes. There was already a FIXME=yes. I just fixed the caps, because I got some type of warning because of this.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-21 02:58:51+00:00): So I guess it is unclear also for you what original author of FIXME meant?
flex16 (2025-12-21 22:22:44+00:00): I believe it's about the fence since the fixme yes is on a point of the fence.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-22 09:00:59+00:00): yes, but what kind of action is needed? in the current form it is utterly useless
4004 (2024-06-15 23:04:53+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку. 
я бы наверное поспорил, что тротуар/sidewalk может быть только рядом с авто дорогой, но не принципиально
SHARCRASH (2024-06-12 20:32:26+00:00): real CS description:
seperation of a highway which in real is seperated + relations/cycleway/boundaries adapted, crossings/sidewalks added, merged equal elements, positions enhanced
Dodko (2024-08-12 23:57:52+00:00): Slovo ulica sa nedáva do názvu ulice.
https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/NEJlJhUbhWA/m/QZgF71ZpBwAJ
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-06-26 23:56:08+00:00): Please don't add lanes as separate ways.
Reverted in

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153224298
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-06-27 00:01:59+00:00): This changeset created a connection between a motorway bridge and the road it crossed.
VictorIE (2024-06-19 08:26:17+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291905027

Some overlapping buildings.
watmildon (2025-12-28 05:48:26+00:00): I did a few small edits around here. Thanks for doing the loads and load of mapping! It looks really great.
rskedgell (2024-07-24 10:42:13+00:00): Reverted. Adding motor_vehicle=no to a school car park's access road was unhelpful. The correct tag would probably be access=private (no and private are not synonyms, although they are often used as if they were).
CurlingMan13 (2024-06-13 06:28:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Changeset looks good.  Keep up the good work!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152606557
1998alexkane (2024-06-24 15:37:17+00:00): Hi!
It looks like you are mapping traffic islands with highway=pedestrian, which is meant for pedestrian streets and areas. I believe a more fitting tag would be area:highway=traffic_island, given pedestrians aren't meant to walk along them.
zstadler (2024-06-13 06:21:49+00:00): Hello map(),

Thank you for your contribution to OSM.
In this and several later edits you made this kind of cleanup on extensive areas of the world.

This changeset, for example, there are 2 nodes in Germany and one node in Britain. As a result, this changeset is falsely identified as applicable to the Nederland, Belgium France and Luxembourg.

Some of the following changesets have had even larger bounding boxes. For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152606803 has 20 nodes spanning the majority of the western hemisphere.

Thank you for your future consideration.
It is expected that changes will be localized.
eisa01 (2024-06-25 19:33:03+00:00): Any reason for using url instead of contact:youtube on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370849280 ?

I thought url was being phased out
woodpeck (2024-06-12 23:13:43+00:00): Why did you delete https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1248998920 which is clearly visible on aerial imagery? It should have been changed to highway=construction if it isn't yet open, instead of deleting it!
VigilantPenguin (2024-06-12 22:25:21+00:00): I picked up a few cities that aren't county seats during this changeset but forgot to mention that in the changeset comment. Eventually I think all incorporated places in WA should get this treatment.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 04:00:17+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11976641352/history has shop = environmental_services that was added in this edit
shop=environmental_services ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
akimapbuilder (2024-06-13 06:33:19+00:00): Try to match building geometry from satellite imagery.  Thanks!
Matmat-25 (2024-06-13 14:35:03+00:00): Bjr, pourquoi ce changement vers area:highway?
Jorisbo (2024-06-13 15:29:26+00:00): Hi matmat , I actually regret it, de Id editor made the proposal and I accepted it.  But later on it turned out not to be a single issue. It is a very nice mapped area, no problem to reverse it. Kind regards, joris
CurlingMan13 (2024-06-13 04:25:45+00:00): What's up with not adding a bridge section where the cartpath goes over the water?
CurlingMan13 (2024-06-17 18:59:09+00:00): Please do not add features that have been built over and no longer exist.  One of the fundamental rules of OSM is to only map what is currently on the ground, and not what was once there.  For mapping things that once existed, but no longer does, OHM is a great site that is similar to OSM but has additional tools for historical mapping.

https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/
rskedgell (2025-04-14 13:02:21+00:00): Unfortunately, motor_vehicle=designated means "designated for use by all motor vehicles at all times".

The short segment of Parliament Street doesn't have any signed vehicle restrictions and doesn't really need access tags in OSM. There are turn restrictions in place which mean it can only be reached by buses approaching from Bridge Street turning right and cycles heading straight on from Parliament Square traffic island.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260763235
AwFi (2024-06-16 14:14:13+00:00): Hi, 
I just saw your changeset and it made quite a mess with tramways, I see that you removed most of the tracks to map them in the roads but not everywhere. I dont think this is how tramways are usually mapped, it's ususally preferred to have them separated, would you mind telling me why you did that?
Same goes for changeset 152609354.

Kindly waiting a response I wish you a nice day.
Necessarycoot72 (2024-06-20 00:05:29+00:00): If I remember right. (osmcha is down) I did this because it's bad practice to overlap open ways (with some exceptions). If tramways are one of these exceptions, I can revert my changesets if you got any info showing that's the case.
AwFi (2024-06-20 08:20:20+00:00): If i remember correctly part of the tramway was not overlapped but parallel on the right side. There was probably overlapping somewhere since it was poorly mapped in origin. I'm not suggesting to keep them overlapped but just parallel on the side, since in this case the road is wide and the tramway is totally on the right side (watching along the direction of the one way).
This is usually done to split the tags and make easier the mapping, if you want you can see here in the wiki, under embedded tracks: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Trams.

Have a nice day
Necessarycoot72 (2024-06-20 08:57:23+00:00): According to the wiki track and roads are supposed to be separate ways. This isn't what I did, so I'm reverting the two changesets you mentioned (152609354;152609305). If you have others mention them and i'll revert them too.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152931823
AwFi (2024-06-20 09:11:06+00:00): I don't think there are other issues.
I'll soon check to see if there are overlapped ways and move them if needed.

Thank you for your comprehension and contribution.
AwFi (2024-06-20 09:15:06+00:00): Now that you reverted I think the proble of the maproulette was about way 1285343942, that is actually overlapped and not connected.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1285343942/
MxxCon (2024-06-18 04:41:39+00:00): Hello.
Generally, in OSM whenever possible it's better to update the existing features into their current state rather than delete existing and create new. Doing that preserves history of that feature, which can be useful to refer to in the future.
In this edit it appears that for some reason you deleted the polygon for the Russian embassy and recreated it again.

Additionally, you created a closed way 1291940537, yet tagged it as a multipolygon.
And created relation 17710791 consisting of just a single member.
When making such edits, please check that you are accomplishing what you are trying to do...

Additionally, when mapping tennis courts, they should be mapped to the actual tennis court itself, not the surrounding area, which can be tagged separately.

I corrected these issues for you.👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152609458
Joseph DiGiovanni (2024-06-18 05:01:47+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. I had attempted to salvage the existing polygon of the Russian compound but it was too tangled up with other nodes to spend the time to fix it properly. I appreciate the fixes!
BladeTC (2024-06-21 23:35:49+00:00): Hey mapper, thansk for your helping, but note that any "place=farm" you notice on these areas, like this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10169665783 is linked to our Public Safety Services, and should not be edited.
Thanks for your understanding, and good mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152609841
Raquel Dezidério Souto (2024-06-23 05:32:25+00:00): Já reincluí o ponto place=farm que ele tinha deletado (ES468).
@BladeTC
Essa pessoa só tem 3 edições...
felipeeugenio (2024-06-13 12:19:16+00:00): Edición vándalica revertida
AngocA (2024-06-15 16:35:14+00:00): Hola JLOSM,

Te quería contar que estos son otros nuevos objetos cerrados que has mapeado como waterway, y deben ser water.

https://waterwaymap.org/loops#map=13.66/6.26055/-74.62117

Me cuentas qué opinas.

Andres G.
Friendly_Ghost (2024-06-13 02:37:03+00:00): Thank you for doing this cleanup!
KiloThree (2024-06-13 15:13:52+00:00): Hello, there are on road bike lanes here, in addition to the sidewalk, so I think it would be correct to keep the cycleway tags on north beacon street? I don't believe there's any hardscape protection here? I don't see it on the Watertown future bike map
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152611236
Baloo Uriza (2024-06-13 19:59:25+00:00): Could you please provide some changeset comments and save before moving to a geographically distant location?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152611862
cubbe8 (2024-06-13 20:01:11+00:00): Sorry, will do next time
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:05:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:05:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
NeisBot (2024-06-13 04:12:24+00:00): Hi Hirgon, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1291977510

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-13 04:56:50+00:00): Thanks for your mapped beach.
Looks good!

#HappyMapping
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 05:34:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152614261 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: vandalism.
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-13 05:21:45+00:00): #vandalism
mavl (2024-06-13 05:34:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152614261 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: vandalism.
mavl (2024-06-13 05:34:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152614261 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: vandalism.
mavl (2024-06-13 05:34:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152614261 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: vandalism.
mavl (2024-06-13 05:34:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152614261 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: vandalism.
mavl (2024-06-13 05:34:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152614261 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: vandalism.
Barroszt (2024-06-13 07:05:58+00:00): Proszę nie niszczyć OpenStreetMap, przecież jest to globalny projekt, który ma na celu stworzenie wolnej, darmowej mapy świata.
mavl (2024-06-13 05:34:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152614261 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: vandalism.
mavl (2024-06-13 05:34:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152614261 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: vandalism.