piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dcapillae (2026-03-26 14:56:50+00:00): He eliminado la ruta «Circular 5 (días de procesión».

Entiendo que este recorrido temporal puede ser de interés para muchas personas durante la Semana Santa, especialmente para quienes se desplazan al centro. Sin embargo, en OpenStreetMap intentamos mapear elementos con cierta permanencia en el tiempo. Las rutas que solo existen durante unos pocos días al año suelen quedar fuera de este criterio.

Además, si incluyéramos este tipo de recorridos temporales, también habría que aplicar el mismo criterio a muchas otras rutas que se modifican durante esos días, lo que complicaría bastante el mantenimiento de la base de datos.

Por eso, en este caso preferimos no incluir este tipo de recorridos temporales. Aun así, se agradece mucho el interés y las ganas de mejorar los recorridos de la EMT.

Tenemos una página en el wiki para hacer seguimiento de las líneas y sus cambios: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Rutas_de_bus_en_M%C3%A1laga

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
jayaddison (2026-05-18 11:04:00+00:00): Thanks for these updates - NB: I have reverted one change from this changeset, to adjust information=map back to information=tactile_map on node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5331191656
jayaddison (2026-05-18 11:05:30+00:00): On second thought: I think information=tactile_model may more accurate; I will apply one more edit to that node.
Monolo23 (2026-05-18 11:10:35+00:00): I agree, information=tactile_model seems more accurate, thanks
demon_box (2026-03-26 18:17:17+00:00): Ciao Adeserpe Benvenuto in OSM! Ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti un edificio può avere più entrate e quindi più numeri civici. 
Quindi hai 2 opzioni: 
1. Se conosci esattamente la posizione (entrata) del civico che stai mappando metti tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su un nodo del perimetro dell'edificio (aggiungendo anche il tag entrance sullo stesso nodo);
2. Se invece non hai questa informazione così precisa devi mettere tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su nodo adiacente ma STACCATO dal poligono dell'edificio.
Ho già proceduto con le correzioni del caso. Grazie e BuonMapping!
env_cubemap (2026-04-15 22:25:35+00:00): Ciao, grazie mille per l'avvertimento e per la modifica, farò del mio meglio per evitare errori simili. BuonMapping anche a te!
Kovoschiz (2026-03-27 08:07:21+00:00): 0. Please use descriptive upload comments, or split your changeset
1. Please check that `building=` is not removed for buildings when adding `=pumping_station`
Dundee930 (2026-03-27 10:23:29+00:00): 大家都係義工，冇收人工。都係攞個心出嚟做好個地圖， 我每一個 Change Set 你都好似上司 / 老細咁下達落指令， 話要咁咁咁， 管住曬要依你意思 ，你係乜水呀。 情況在這樣下去，我只好淡出， 唔阻你喺度做大佬！

I’m a volunteer, not your employee. Stop treating my Change Sets like tasks from a boss. If you want to micromanage everything and play king of the hill, go ahead—but I’m out.
Kovoschiz (2026-03-28 08:29:04+00:00): You did cause damage by removing the `building=` there. I'm pointing this out. If you don't want to read them, ignore it. But don't complaint if others change your work.
Kovoschiz (2026-03-28 08:43:56+00:00): Be bold in what you create. Be cautious in what you change. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._K._Chesterton#Chesterton's_fence
"It is important to understand that warnings are just warnings, they should be examined and fixed where possible but never at the cost of introducing wrong data. Some validators warnings are generated for valid data. Often in such cases validator code should be fixed, not OSM data. Sometimes false positives are unavoidable. " https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quality_assurance
GSF1200S (2026-04-13 17:29:51+00:00): 師兄你係咪新黎....呢條友出曬名周圍亂Q改人地D野 ga la，當正自己係大佬每日周圍發指令.... LOL
Kovoschiz (2026-04-14 18:34:29+00:00): If anything, the "亂Q" here is removing the `building=` . There's no "人地D野" in OSM.  
"Other mappers can ask for clarification on your edits, ask you to provide a source for them, or point out mistakes you made. " https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Someone_commented_on_my_changeset,_what_should_I_do?
And you are infamous for commenting about your personal vendetta in random changesets.
kingkingHK (2026-05-21 09:28:20+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182965743
Wildsharky (2026-04-01 14:26:11+00:00):  Reverted in changeset id:180488769
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-01 14:30:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180488769
bartgron (2026-03-26 21:19:21+00:00): Zestaw zmian został wycofany.
Pozdrawiam
mrpenner (2026-03-27 02:05:56+00:00): Hello, thanks for your contributions! I had a question on a node added in this changeset with tags amenity=hospital and name=Ambulance Distributor. Is it actually a hospital or is it an ambulance station? Compare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhospital and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dambulance_station. I can change it if needed.

I see you used Organic Maps to add it, I suppose it has presets and hospital is the closest it has to ambulance station?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180456875
mrpenner (2026-04-14 02:12:59+00:00): I went there and it is indeed an ambulance station. Fixed with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181300602
aparra09 (2026-03-26 15:42:05+00:00): Para quien revise esto, debo mencionar que el nombre oficial o legal del camino es "La Gloria Sur" y se usa informalmente decir "La Gloria Sur - Camino Las Torres" como referencia a unas Torres de alta tensión que pasan cerca. Al indicar primero y solo "Camino Las Torres" personas que no son de la zona confunden dicho camino con otros cercanos por donde también pasan las torres de alta tensión. Espero haberlo indicado bien. He mapeado poco. Acepto críticas, sugerencias e indicaciones para mejorar en mis próximas modificaciones.
felipeeugenio (2026-03-26 16:17:36+00:00): Hola. 
el tag que se usa en name= es el nombre oficial, pero eso funciona para zonas urbanas, donde las calles tienen un nombre y los nombres alternativos son marginales. hay excepciones, pero son muy pocas.

Para caminos rurales está el official_name= que por lo general contiene la nomenclatura del MOP, pero pasa muchas veces que los caminos tienen otro nombre.

por favor, en estos casos, usar el nombre con que el camino es conocido. Si tiene un nombre oficial, pero que no es usado, usar official_name o alt_name.

Saludos
felipeeugenio (2026-03-26 16:18:44+00:00): En todo caso todas estas cosas se pueden discutir en el chat de la comunidad chilena de OSM, a la cual está invitado en el link https://t.me/OSMcl. Hay que bajar telegram, app muy similar a whatsapp.

saludos
aparra09 (2026-03-26 17:20:11+00:00): Vale, muchas gracias. Entonces en name= está bien indicar como "La Gloria Sur - Camino Las Torres" pues es  con el nombre por el cual el camino es más fácil de reconocer. Y Debería agregar "La Gloria Sur" en official_name o alt_name . De todos modos plantearé mi duda con ayuda de tus indicaciones en el grupo de telegram que me dices. De nuevo, muchas gracias.

Saludos!
NeisBot (2026-03-26 14:51:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12047400024 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Diseño Web_agencia → Oficina 

rewritten to 
Oficina"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Diseño Web_agencia → Oficina 

reescrito a 
Oficina"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-03 16:33:19+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180821405
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
bartgron (2026-03-26 21:17:13+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany z powodu błędów.
Pozdrawiam
eggie (2026-03-26 15:16:40+00:00): Hoi,
Je vraagt feedback.
Het is wel correct om iets op construction te zetten als het zo'n lange tijd onderbroken is. 
'k Kan even aan de route=expert vragen of het zin heeft die routes tijdelijk om te leiden.
MVG
eggie
antoon334 (2026-03-26 15:37:26+00:00): Hey! 

Thanks for such a quick reply. 
Unfortunately, I am not that proficient in Dutch yet and the Google Translate didn't make it perfectly clear for me either. Hope you understand :)

Should I add the route=expert tag to this part of the bike line?
I also looked up in the wiki but haven't found any "expert" mentions on the "route" page. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:route
As of now my navigation app of choise (Organic Maps) always routes me through this part of the currently-not-existing lane.
eggie (2026-03-26 15:43:56+00:00): Hi.. I asked already our route-expert Dvdhoven.
Let's wait for the answer.
For now it's okay.
I let you known.
With editor iD you can't manage route relation...
only with editor Josm and some skills.

Greetz,
eggie
antoon334 (2026-03-26 15:50:26+00:00): Great, thank you very much for your help, eggie!
eggie (2026-03-26 17:10:36+00:00): I will change the routerelation later on.
Gr eggie
eggie (2026-03-26 18:36:48+00:00): Detour cycleroutes

https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=17.0/51.9113/4.4352
antoon334 (2026-03-26 18:43:58+00:00): Great! 
Would this change work with osm-based maps such as previously mentioned Organic Maps or CoMaps?
eggie (2026-03-26 18:57:31+00:00): Sure.. but I don't know when these apps get their updates.

After the next update it will do the job.
Paweł_M (2026-03-26 18:42:14+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za wkład w OSM.
Jeśli chodzi o przystanek w Ulanowie, on już był oznaczony w miejscu wiaty przystankowej. Nie ma potrzeby dodawać go drugi raz w miejscu zatoki.
Co do parkingów, nie oznaczamy poboczy dróg, gdzie zwykle stają kierowcy, jeśli nie ma tam znaków poziomych lub pionowych. Takie miejsca to łuk obok studni na rynku, czy droga obok cmentarza. Tam nie ma parkingów nawet jeśli ludzie się tam zatrzymują
I nie usuwaj krawężników, nawet jeśli są płasko z drogą
Paweł_M (2026-03-26 18:46:59+00:00): Z tym krawężnikiem to widzę, że taki krawężnika trafiły na linię przejścia dla pieszych
iandees (2026-03-26 15:33:16+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10240607526 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180459959, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
bartgron (2026-03-27 21:27:30+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany z powodu błędów.
Pozdrawiam
bartgron (2026-03-27 21:29:16+00:00): Zestaw zmian został wycofany z powodu błędów.
Pozdrawiam
gscholz (2026-05-03 06:27:27+00:00): Hi AlhassaneDiallo,
your recent cahngesets have left behind a lot of errors regarding overlappin and self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-9.57511&lat=11.14385&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-10.08292&lat=11.01447&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
bartgron (2026-03-26 21:13:53+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany.
Pozdrawiam
bartgron (2026-03-26 21:12:26+00:00): Zestaw zmian został wycofany z powodu błędów.
Pozdrawiam
Bartek444 (2026-06-08 21:47:54+00:00): Zachowaj większą ostrożność przy edytowaniu
W tej edycji został przesunięty żywopłot przez całą miejscowość, zakładam, że przez przypadek. Już poprawiłem. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1194041400/history/2
MihaelIvanjek (2026-03-26 15:23:04+00:00): Node that was accidentally created has since been deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180459365 #OptimoRoute
maro21 (2026-03-26 18:09:20+00:00): Wystarczyło przesunąć węzeł. A tak usunąłeś historię obiektu i utworzyłeś nowy. A z nim całe mnóstwo szczegółowych tagów.
bartgron (2026-03-26 21:08:35+00:00): Zestaw zmian został wycofany z powodu błędów.
Pozdrawiam
NeisBot (2026-03-26 15:24:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13621338591 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Construction office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-03 16:33:22+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180821409
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
felipeeugenio (2026-03-26 16:11:33+00:00): Hola. Gracias.
en todo caso, si se llama "La Gloria", sin la palabra "Camino", entonces que así sea. No tiene porque haber una concordancia con otros caminos, por lo menos no en este sentido.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180459455
aparra09 (2026-03-26 17:32:42+00:00): Hola! Gracias por tu respuesta. Según tu comentario en mi otra edición, en name= seria correcto el nombre por el cual es mas comúnmente conocido entonces (Camino La Gloria), y en official_name o alt_name el nombre oficial o legal, que en este caso seria "La Gloria", "La Gloria Ruta N-271", "Ruta N-271 La Gloria" o algo similar, pues como Nombre oficial tiene escrito Cruce N-269 (La Gloria) - Cruce N-265 (El Peñón), que mas que nombre oficial parece una referencia de ubicación. Y que por lo demás, no corresponde pues la ruta N-269 no es de La Gloria.

Saludos!
OlasMapy (2026-03-28 17:37:01+00:00): "mojego domu rodzinnego"
Openstreetmap to nie google żebyś musiał udostępniać swoje dane
bartgron (2026-03-27 21:30:56+00:00): Droga usunięta jako duplikat drogi dodanej już do OSM.
Pozdrawiam
silversurfer83 (2026-03-26 21:29:53+00:00): Hi :)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13682127701 sieht nicht korrekt beschrieben aus

Grüße

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180459849
NeisBot (2026-03-26 15:36:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13623778570 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Screen store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-03 16:33:25+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180821413
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
NeisBot (2026-03-26 15:39:42+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/271240382 v2 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/271240386 v2 | 4 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180460069
iandees (2026-03-26 15:48:37+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2761928043 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180460730, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
felipeeugenio (2026-03-26 16:06:27+00:00): Hello. This is plain vandalism, I think. I'll check the existence of the deleted elements and revert if necessary.
thanks
Linabp (2026-03-26 16:12:29+00:00): IM SO SORRY I DIDINT KNOW THIS WOULD EVRYONES MAP !! omg, i wanted a less condensed version so i edited because i thought i could download it, but i actually didint know what i was doing. Im so incredibly sorry, please let me know how can i revert this.
felipeeugenio (2026-03-26 16:56:49+00:00): Hola @Linabp. No te preocupes. Ya se reparó todo. Se agradece la actitud.

saludos
iandees (2026-03-26 15:48:42+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4005132865 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180460735, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-03-26 15:57:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13682162806 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Real estate agency"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Agencja nieruchomości"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-03 16:33:28+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/180475673
aixbrick (2026-05-08 19:50:34+00:00): Hallo,
wurde diese Filiale tatsächlich geschlossen?
Gruß
Irgendwer-999 (2026-05-08 21:55:32+00:00): Ja, schon seit Monaten nicht mehr offen, wird aber von der Suchseite der Post weiter angezeigt.
aixbrick (2026-05-09 08:25:58+00:00): Darum hatte ich nachgefragt :-). Danke für die Rückmeldung.
iandees (2026-03-26 16:21:33+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1038360537 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180462365, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
rempshaener (2026-03-26 19:09:29+00:00): Hello,
what went wrong? The shop=cosmetics node no longer exists there, so did you  want to delete the whole node?
Best regards
Udarian (2026-03-30 01:50:16+00:00): next time can you please leave a better changeset comment as the comment on this one doesn't really tell me anything about what you did in this changeset. A good changeset comments doesn't need to be to complex, something like "Updated the description of a business" would have been sufficient for this changeset. For more information on changeset comments see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Happy mapping,
Udar.
Szymson (2026-03-26 16:19:34+00:00): Usuń "Biuro Rachunkowe" a zostaw samo ProTaxEwa i będzie to zgodne z zasadami OSM ;)
NeisBot (2026-03-26 16:24:53+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13662753760 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Appliance store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-03 16:33:30+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180821417
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
Ltrlg (2026-04-03 08:23:54+00:00): Uniquement ce tronçon ? Quid de way/1442163535, way/753355762, way/753355763 ?
mw014 (2026-04-03 09:53:05+00:00): Effectivement, c'est ajouté.
stasiu512 (2026-03-26 18:51:06+00:00): Cześć, tag highway=cycleway implikuje bicycle=designated, a tag highway=footway implikuje foot=designated, więc dodawanie tych tagów jeśli jest już highway jest całkowicie zbędne. Znaczniki usunąłem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180469805. Przesyłam również linki do wiki na ten temat - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway=cycleway?uselang=pl
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway=footway?uselang=pl.
Pozdrawiam:)
PouLS_PL (2026-03-27 12:31:56+00:00): Ok, wielkie dzięki za linki do wiki
NeisBot (2026-03-26 16:36:54+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13682199981 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Nail salon"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-03 22:33:10+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180832918
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-03-26 16:39:56+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13679895944 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Orthodontic clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-03 22:33:13+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180832919
(Restore previous tags. No changes)