piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2025-07-09 02:03:37+00:00): #TIP: when edits in distant areas, save and upload before editing in a distant place.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168627812
Joseph R P (2025-07-08 16:40:38+00:00): Hello, while on paper it makes to have a primary route connect to I 15 from the junction south of Moapa Valley, the Valley of Fire Highway is also a park road with an entry fee used only by parkgoers for most of it route, and is not used by through traffic heading between the town and the Interstate. Route 169 is the only major road in an out of Moapa Valley and this leads to another rather uncommon primary spur instance here.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-07-08 16:44:25+00:00): Okay, I'll revert this, too.
0xb7767000 (2025-07-08 09:45:26+00:00): Moin, du hast hier versehentlich den Knoten einer Straße quer durchs Land verschoben. Wäre schön, wenn du den wieder zurückschieben, oder alternativ ein revert dieses Changesets machen könntest.

Das hier ist der Knoten den ich meine:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10845967495/history
0xb7767000 (2025-07-08 10:38:27+00:00): Die kaputte geometrie wurde hier bereits behoben:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168640851
FajrAl (2025-08-12 08:02:55+00:00): Nama desanya Desa Sukarame. Jika nama desa diubah jadi Desa BUMDES MAJU BERSAMA, maka Desa Sukarame tidak akan muncul di peta OSM; yang tampil adalah BUMDES MAJU BERSAMA.
Supaplex (2025-07-08 05:47:34+00:00): 不太算完全錯誤，而是歷史遺跡，以前因為程式關係，會標示oneway=-1，但漸漸被棄用
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168628362
Rachel2010 (2025-07-08 02:55:06+00:00): Thanks for fixing :) Yes it was in error, you may not have seen my reply yet but as I noted under my "fix mistakes" note there was a glitch in street complete and I wasn't even completely sure what had happened/what I'd done. I'm also still learning to map correctly so always happy to have someone double check/fix/finesse.
aharvey (2025-07-08 03:34:18+00:00): No worries.
CJJ2501 (2025-07-11 09:46:45+00:00): Hi kharismaanindia,

Looking at this changeset, it looks like you deleted some parts of the street and the footway that goes into this complex. Any particular reason for doing so?

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=168628878
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-11 13:55:53+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12986942871/history has shop = skincare that was added in this edit
shop=skincare ? How it differs from shop=cosmetics ? Should we document this tag as a new shop value?
tastrax (2025-07-08 06:39:14+00:00): Thanks for your edits - you can easily "square' buildings using the Q key and you also make things circular with the O key (water tanks etc)
BholeKiBhasam (2025-07-09 08:43:30+00:00): G'day,

Thank you for the feedback....and the tips are sure useful and for quick edits...

Have a great day ahead and great weekdays
selillium (2025-07-08 04:34:11+00:00): Source is Bing/extrap

Oopsie-woopsies.
Omnific (2025-07-08 16:45:39+00:00): Hi, please be a bit more careful. You accidentally turned an entire major road into a bike rack.
Warin61 (2026-01-03 22:35:05+00:00): Hi,
There are a number of problems with these entries...
See OSMInspector .. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=166.66692&lat=-77.84619&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

JOSM validator reports 
4 errors - ways contains segments twice
a number of warnings - 2 on missing tags *=construction without construction=*
ColbyTheWorldTraveler (2026-01-09 16:54:12+00:00): Needless to say, I'm going to wait until there's a more stable way to indoor map before I attempt to do that anymore.
SomeoneElse (2025-07-09 17:53:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 168708079, 168708082 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed guessed-geometry import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18428
SomeoneElse (2025-07-09 17:53:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 168708079, 168708082 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed guessed-geometry import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18428
SomeoneElse (2025-07-09 17:53:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 168708079, 168708082 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed guessed-geometry import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18428
nevw (2025-07-09 05:59:37+00:00): Hi, the building tag is to be used to map the footprint of individual buildings instead the building plot of the businesses. If you want to make the land holding just use the landuse tag or map the fencelines.
nevw (2025-07-09 06:00:27+00:00): corr...If you want to map the land holding...
iamiandyi (2025-07-09 23:41:39+00:00): All of these sites are built I'm confused as to what the error here is? 204 has just been built, even though satellite shows empty plot. The rest of the buildings have been completed for 2 years now.

Please advise on how you would like me to edit?
iamiandyi (2025-07-09 23:42:44+00:00): Or did I use the wrong mapping tool?
fortera_au (2025-07-10 04:01:55+00:00): The building tag that you used is meant for outlining the building itself, not the whole land parcel.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168631470
iamiandyi (2025-07-10 04:08:03+00:00): Oh it looks like someone has fixed this for me?
nevw (2025-07-10 04:09:52+00:00): Sorry for the misunderstanding.
I remapped the area to assist. 
These were within an industrial landuse so I made this part of the area landuse=commercial as you mapped instead.
 Generally those where more than one building shared the same housenumber, I put the address details on the commercial landuse area instead of the building.
The religious tagging on the parking island in the turning loop appeared to be nonsense so I deleted that. 
Address number 240 was misplaced so I shifted that over where I thought it likely belonged.
I marked the driveways but did not include oneway directions because it was not obvious from imagery.
The addresses on the landuse=commercial don't appear on the map so will give a bit more time for it to render on the map and if they don't render, I'll shift the addresses of those to a separate new node like those further along the street.
Ersi imagery is more recent than Bing so use that too.
You don't need to include addr: (postcode, state (QLD) or suburb) in addresses as these are already mapped by their boundary but I left these as is.
Hope you don't mind me doing this.
Feel free to fix and and adjust where wrong.
iamiandyi (2025-07-10 04:12:42+00:00): Absolute legend mate, I appreciate your assistance in this!
GA_Kevin (2025-07-14 14:24:16+00:00): Hey! Thanks for this! At what point should we mark this area as construction for Radiator Springs and remove the river of america and the (now old) Tom Sawyer Island?
Durek1993 (2025-07-08 18:36:36+00:00): Hello tatsiana-krauchanka,
please revert your changes they are not correct anymore. I was there two weeks ago and map the new building geometry. The aerial imagery you used was outdated.
Durek
tatsiana-krauchanka (2025-07-09 09:47:23+00:00): Hello Durek1993!
Thanks so much for your quick response. I didn't realize your data was based on your personal observation of the location. My apologies for any inconvenience caused by using outdated satellite imagery. I'll revert the changes to the previous version.
Sincerely, tatsiana-krauchanka.
Durek1993 (2025-07-09 10:21:42+00:00): No problem, thanks for your quick revert and your other useful work around the world!
Sincerly Durek
tatsiana-krauchanka (2025-07-09 12:59:42+00:00): I truly appreciate knowing that my work is helpful. It means a lot to our team!
Best regards, tatsiana-krauchanka
Leo Slager (2025-07-09 10:48:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-08 06:31:48+00:00): Я откатил ваши правки, потому что вы снова сдивнули дом по нерпавильно привязанному снимку. Сейчас буду просить вас забанить.

I've reverted your edits because you've moved building by wrongly adjusted satellite imagery again. I'll request ban for you

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168633215
Glassman (2025-07-10 21:17:38+00:00): The organized editing guidelines your firm added to the OSM wiki state that you will add the following to your changesets "#propertyview" I see that some of your have it and others do not. Please make sure to follow the practice your company made to OSM.
NeisBot (2025-07-08 06:16:28+00:00): Hi Majd ALMASRI, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added town hall information to a node, categorizing it as a city townhall."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
Leo Slager (2025-07-09 10:51:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2025-07-09 11:01:22+00:00): Alleen een naam doet niets op de kaart.
Ik heb amenity=dentist toegevoegd.
philam48 (2025-08-29 09:51:35+00:00): Hello! Thanks for contribution to OpenStreetMap. Could I please ask the source of these local cycling routes? Are these designated routes or otherwise any physical infrastructure to indicate their presence? You can see this for more information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

Thanks!
Omnific (2025-07-08 16:43:28+00:00): Hi, please don't stack roads. Use the cycleway tags to indicate what kind of cycleway is on the road: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway.

Let me know if you have questions!
xrefz (2025-09-23 20:00:00+00:00): Maps aren't up to date, there is construction
xrefz (2025-09-23 20:02:14+00:00): Maps aren't up to date, there is construction
Leo Slager (2025-07-09 11:06:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
acubens71 (2025-07-12 14:20:27+00:00): Hello,

You are creating duplicate elements of existing places and the tag is also inappropriate (this is clearly not a city).
lyctkel (2025-07-08 08:19:20+00:00): typo:
chadd->check
joost schouppe (2025-08-17 08:41:44+00:00): Waarop baseer je dat dit de Scoutsdreef is? De huizen langs dit stuk hebben adressen van de Rallylaan. Op het GRB staat dit nog deels verkeerd, ik doe opnieuw een melding bij de gemeente.
YuliyaSurta (2025-07-08 08:29:58+00:00): Also changed road class.
bxl-forever (2025-07-08 08:45:26+00:00): Hello,

Thanks and welcome to OSM.

We have two questions about this:

1. You claim that the one-way street was introduced in 2022.  On this picture taken in July 2024, there is no indication about one-way signs here:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1006722197572097

2. You added a restriction for ALL modes of transport.  This is very rare.  The usual rule in Brussels is that when a street becomes one-way for motor vehicles, there are white signs allowing cyclists to use it in both directions (M2) or sometimes speed pedelecs too (M11).
Can you please tell us if such white signs are present here?
OSM is used to navigate ALL modes of transports, not just cars, so this is important.

Thanks in advance for your reply under this message.
dypa (2025-07-09 06:59:30+00:00): Здравствуйте, вы продублировали данные по адресу для https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150373875. Пожалуйста остановите автоматический импорт и решите проблему с созданием дубликатов!
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-08 08:50:54+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2969653874
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363617325

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Drakon79 (2025-07-08 09:20:08+00:00): Poprawny adres tej lokalizacji to Ozorkowska 8. Pracuję tutaj :). Ogólnie to na ten ulicy adresy są pomieszane cześć budynków należy do "Tymianki" a część do "Strykowa"
bxl-forever (2025-07-08 08:49:10+00:00): Thanks for drawing new cycle tracks—which we will assume have been built very recently.

Please try to spend some time learning how to edit OSM properly before engaging in massive redrawings of infrastructure.  I am afraid you are doing it incorrectly: you attached a cycle track to a boundary way instead of a road, and your new cycle track ends on a sidewalk with no accessible connectors, therefore it creates a broken routing grid.

I would be happy to talk it with you and help you improve this.
theDM (2025-07-08 12:56:15+00:00): +1
FroschForscher (2025-07-08 19:23:42+00:00): Hallo SaritahLuisa willkommen bei OSM,

du hast hier beim Verschieben der Karte versehentlich einen Bordstein samt zugehörigem Weg verschoben und mit einem Stück Grass verklebt. Das habe ich rückgängig gemacht.

iD sollte hier auch eine Warnung vor dem speichern angezeigt haben. 

FroschForscher

--

Achavi: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=168638367
FroschForscher (2025-07-08 19:25:58+00:00): Hier habe ich ebenfalls etwas rückgängig gemacht, alle Änderungen an der Bahnstrecke Ulm-Wendlingen.
vasony (2025-07-13 08:40:04+00:00): Szia!

Mi szerepel az utcatáblán?

Tamás
tandr88 (2025-07-15 07:52:13+00:00): Szia!

Találtam egy régi utcatáblát. Szénffy Gusztáv. Rendben, visszaállítom.
tux67 (2025-07-08 09:42:54+00:00): Hi Ahrdie, es wäre schön wenn du bei deinem CS auch einen Quellenangabe machst. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments - Ich vermute mal du warst vor Ort? Ich wohne hier und nach meinem bisherigen Wissen sind nur die beiden nördlichen Teile deines MPs zu Zelten genutzt. Gab es eine Änderung?
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168638977
Ahrdie (2025-07-08 09:53:27+00:00): Hi Tux67,
guter Punkt, ich war letztes Jahr hier und da haben wir auf dem rechten Teil der unteren Wiese auch Zelte stehen gehabt. Wahrscheinlich müsste man die Rasenfläche in eine westliche und eine östliche aufteilen.  Ich meine da ist ja auch eigentlich noch ein Fußballfeld. Liebe Grüße!
marc__marc (2026-02-20 17:35:09+00:00): vous avez ici le parfait exemple de ce que je décrivais dans le précédent message :
vous avez supprimé https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/731820939/history/5

quelqu'un l'a rajouté
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418834283/history/1

quelqu'un la réeffacé

quelqu'un l'a rajouté https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170650693 pensant que c'était du vendalisme
PJ120 (2025-08-08 15:57:45+00:00): Hallo lichtwurz,

der gelöschte Weg ist vor Ort vorzufinden und (zumindest aktuell) entsprechend gut begehbar. Auch in amtlichen Karten ist er verzeichnet womit Betreten erlaubt ist. Vielleicht ist es hier eher passend, einfach auf erschwerte Begehbarkeit mit smoothness=bad zu verweisen?

LG
lichtwurz (2025-08-09 12:01:40+00:00): Hallo PJ120,
Danke für deine Rückmeldung!
Auf der Fläche wurden vor ein paar Jahren Naturschutzmaßnahmen durchgeführt um den Sumpf wieder zu vernässen. Deswegen sollte die Fläche im Sinn einer ungestörten Entwicklung nicht betreten werden.
Auf welche amtlichen Karten beziehst du dich? Das würde mich zu meiner eigenen Orientierung sehr interessieren!
LG
Jordi MF (2025-07-08 11:25:10+00:00): Hola JhayP_tatoo,

Has añadido de manera incorrecta una web sobre tatuajes en un parque. ¿Tienes un negocio de tatuajes y quieres añadirlo? Si nos explicas en qu´lugar concreto está, podremos añadirlo de manera correcta.
Saludos
Leo Slager (2025-07-09 11:09:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2025-07-09 11:13:14+00:00): Dag craakash,

Helaas is hierbij iets niet goed gegaan.
Je hebt de rijweg voor auto's gewijzigd naar een fietspad. Routing voor auto's zal dus niet meer over deze weg kunnen routeren.
Verder zal het fietspad fysiek gescheiden zijn van de rijbaan en dan moet het dus apart, naast de rijweg worden ingetekend.

Ik zal deze changeset reverten.
Leo Slager (2025-07-09 11:24:31+00:00): Het fietspad opnieuw ingetekend.
Welk verkeersbord staat er voor het fietspad ?  G11 of G12a ?
Leo Slager (2025-07-09 22:13:14+00:00): Als je verder wilt gaan, kun je dan het laatste deel van het fietspad naar de Schipholweg ook intekenen ?
kuhni74 (2025-07-28 11:08:34+00:00): war ungefähr hier nicht schon früher ein hamlet-node? Ist rekonstruierbar, wer den gelöscht hat?
Luzandro (2025-07-28 11:17:57+00:00): gibts offenbar noch, aber ist jetzt craft=watchmaker statt place=village 

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/240111893
Luzandro (2025-07-28 12:46:18+00:00): ich hab die beiden Punkte vereint, primären name habe ich aktuell auf Fanningberg gelassen, nachdem auch die zugehörigen Adressen so angegeben sind

hier ein Ausschnitt der Meldungen aus dem Chat per Suche nach Fanningberg: https://i.imgur.com/s49vYPI.png
kuhni74 (2025-07-29 08:51:12+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Chat-Link! Ich bin mittlerweile ein bissl verwirrt von den vielen Kommunikationsformaten. Zur Schreibweise: der Ort im Gemeindegebiet von Mariapfarr heißt "Fanning", der Gipfel zwischen Weißpriach und Tweng heißt "Fanninghöhe", das Schigebiet im Gemeindegebiet von Weißpriach heißt "Fanningberg" und die Ortschaft und Katastralgemeinde im Gemeindegebiet von Mauterndorf heißt "Faningberg". Klingt blöd, ist aber so. Ich plädiere auf "name=Faningberg" und "alt_name=Fanningberg". Und die Hausadressen sollten m.E. auch auf "addr:place=Faningberg" lauten.
Luzandro (2025-07-29 10:02:50+00:00): Es taugt auch nicht gerade als Quellenangabe und du verpasst nicht viel. Wie gesagt, die meisten Unterkünfte dort dürften ihre eigene Adresse mit "Fanningberg" angeben, aber du kannst die gerne trotzdem ändern. Ich habe nur, wie ich mir das angesehen habe, einen entsprechenden place mit beiden Varianten angelegt, nachdem zu diesem Zeitpunkt gar keiner zu sehen war
kuhni74 (2025-07-29 10:56:57+00:00): Das mit dem watchmaker war nur eine Panne, sh. Disk. zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165790770.
Z.B. der Heinererhof gibt ausdrücklich Faningberg an.
StC (2025-07-08 20:17:47+00:00): Bonjour Denis,

ce changeset a créé une boucle dans un itinéraire pédestre (classique quand on remplace un croisement par une voirie plus complexe). Je m'occupe de la réparation.
Denis_Helfer (2025-07-09 12:50:28+00:00): Désolé pour le dérangement. On ne pense pas toujours à toutes les conséquences des modifications qu'on opère. Dès fois une maille saute dans le tricot.
Merci pour ta réparation.
StC (2025-07-10 08:06:19+00:00): Tant que les outils ne géreront pas ça mieux, c'est inévitable. De temps en temps je tombe sur de la casse que j'ai faite moi-même :-)
johsin18 (2025-07-11 05:19:26+00:00): Das korrekte Tagging wäre
access:offroad=no
Jorisbo (2025-07-11 07:08:56+00:00): Hallo Johsin, i changed it, regards Joris
yelisey90 (2026-01-13 17:10:36+00:00): reverted: mass changes using not on-the-ground checking, but some undetermined sources, possibly simply aerial imagery; including incorrect surface tagging (asphalt instead of unpaved or sett), incorrect addresses to buildings etc.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177188720
Silvlvia (2025-07-08 14:46:49+00:00): Part of Jalan topas raya
Frans S (2025-07-08 12:06:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome. 
I reviewed a few tasks where you did some mappings.
However, they were not complete mapped. (mainly farmland)
Here, you mapped a triangle as farmland (not covering the whole area) However, this was already mapped by another mapper 
On the east side, you just mapped a small part after deleting an old (2020) mapped farmland.
Do you have a mentor who can assist you with these mappings?
This don't work well.
Please do not mark a task as complete mapped till you gained more experience. (just mark more mappings needed.)
Best regards.
HopeyMaps (2025-07-09 09:28:52+00:00): Hi! Thank you so much for the feedback. I really appreciate the effort you put into it.

It's unfortunate that I do not have a mentor to assist me, I just watched the recording from the last UN Mappers webinar. 

I am very eager to learn and would be so glad if you could become my mentor, if that's fine by you.

Thank you.
NeisBot (2025-07-08 10:15:53+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 05:20:25+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/168642278
AndreaDp271 (2025-07-28 09:36:14+00:00): Thank you for your contribution but try to make smaller changeset areas. Thank you. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168642082
Andrea Del Sarto (2025-07-28 12:38:41+00:00): Thanks for the information.
I'll look into the wiki.
Leo Slager (2025-07-09 11:27:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2025-07-09 11:30:59+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk:
Je hebt hier ook de adres gegevens verwijderd van de kaart, en dat is natuurlijk niet de bedoeling.
Ik zal de adres-node herstellen.
balkonbewohner (2025-07-08 10:24:26+00:00): Ich versuche das gleich mal zu reverten; hier sollten eigentlich nur Änderungen von Birgel drin sein.
Syl (2025-07-08 10:38:09+00:00): Bonjour, il y a problème avec  votre modification. Ce nœud n'a pas à avoir l'attribut bâtiment, le bâtiment est représenté par un objet différent : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/79203184
TeamDELKO (2025-07-08 12:20:49+00:00): Bonjour bonjour,

J'ai cru comprendre qu'il pouvait être intéressant de renseigner l'attribut "building=retail" sur l'ensemble des fiches...J'ai du mal à comprendre haha

J'allais le faire pour les 155 garages mais j'ai pas envie de le faire pour rien ou de négliger les bonnes procédures...qui peut m'aider ? :(
Syl (2025-07-08 13:36:38+00:00): Suivant les cas les garages sont représentés sous la forme d'un point ou d'une surface. Généralement ils sont mis sur le bâtiment seulement lorsque c'est son unique usage. L'attribut "building" n'est pertinent que sur les surfaces qui représentent les bâtiments.
Pour résumer il n'y a pas à ajouter "building" sur les nœuds, il y a juste à modifier la valeur de "building" sur les polygones qui ont déjà cet attribut.