piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Woazboat (2023-12-01 15:23:15+00:00): Hallo, 

Erst einmal, toll dass ihr in der Leitstelle OSM verwendet. Immer schön zu sehen wenn OSM auch "offiziell" verwendet wird. 

Kommen wir zur eigentlichen Sache.
Kurz vorweg, der User @beautifulplaces kann getrost ignoriert werden. Es handelt sich um einen altbekannten Troll der schon mehrmals gebannt wurde, immer wieder versucht diese Bans zu umgehen, und für den alles eine wirre "Verschwörung von Berufsgeographen gegen ihn" ist.

Die Organised Editing Guidelines sind nicht nur für mapping durch kommerzielle Firmen gedacht, sondern kommen auch dann zur Anwendung wenn Mapper an einem gemeinsamen (extern) organisierten Ziel arbeiten oder die Bearbeitungen im Auftrag einer Organisation erfolgen. Der Sinn dahinter ist, dass diese Bearbeitungen als solche gekennzeichnet sind damit sie einfacher von anderen Usern zugeordnet und verstanden werden können. Wie ich sehe hast in deinem Userprofil schon vermerkt dass du bei der Leitstelle arbeitest. Was hier im Vorhinein nicht ganz hervorgegangen ist ist ob diese Bearbeitungen für/im Auftrag der Leitstelle passieren oder ob diese rein privat sind. Das wäre z.B. nützlich zu wissen und zu kennzeichnen.

Changeset-Kommentare bzw. Beschreibungen sind als Information für andere Benutzer gedacht um es ihnen leichter zu machen die durchgeführten Änderungen zu verstehen. Alleine die Existenz eines Changesets impliziert bereits dass etwas geändert bzw. upgedated wurde, d.h. eine Changesetbeschreibung die nur "Update" ist komplett redundant und hat keinerlei Informationsgehalt. Sinnvoller wäre hier ein kurzer Kommentar wie z.B. "Polizeistation-Namenskürzel f. Leitstelle Tirol".

Nun zum verwendeten Tag. `alt_name` ist eigentlich nicht für (interne) Kürzel gedacht, sondern sollte ein Name sein der auch allgemein bekannt ist und auch als Name verwendet wird. Hier in diesem Fall halte ich es eher für unwahrscheinlich dass eine Person auf der Straße ein Polizeiinspektion "PI" nennen würde? Wenn es wirklich eine Namensabkürzung ist wäre `short_name` besser geeignet.
Kürzel oder Referenznummern die keine wirklichen Namen sind wären besser im `ref:*=*` namespace aufgehoben. Hier könnte auch ein eigener namespace für die Leitstelle Tirol angelegt werden wie (nur als Beispiel) `ref:AT:T:leitstelle=*`.

lg, Woazboat
Hungerburg (2023-12-01 23:54:09+00:00): Aufpassen, dieser mapper hier und der andere, und beautifulplaces schon gar nicht sind nicht von der Leitstelle. Ich werde da mal nachfragen, die haben auch Anwälte.
Negreheb (2023-12-04 07:41:47+00:00): Vorschlag zur Güte: ich setze gern den Ort, in dem ich das Update gemacht habe vor. Hier z. B. "Kappl: Update PI" zumindest. Somit ist das einfach für dich als Bearbeiter und wenn man drüber schaut sieht man schnell, wo was war und auch ungefähr was. 

Beim Rest stimme ich den anderen zu (bis auf beautifulpaces ...).
gscholz (2023-12-04 12:36:49+00:00): Hi LogoneRiver,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-72.20093&lat=7.79336&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144645822

Especially way 261165388 is affected here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261165388#map=19/7.79382/-72.20072

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
LogoneRiver (2023-12-06 15:24:32+00:00): Hello gscholz, thank you for contacting me. My intention was to align this area more accurately, I can see my edits have caused some overlapping features. I will make fixes to the features (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261165388) affected by my alignment updates.  Have a nice day.
gscholz (2023-12-07 09:14:15+00:00): Thanks for your quick response.
Guido
Matt_ (2023-12-01 03:11:44+00:00): Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_National_Inventory_of_Dams
Matt_ (2023-12-01 03:14:55+00:00): And also: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/42521
erickdeoliveiraleal (2025-04-25 10:33:25+00:00): não grude áreas em vias como fez aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227927935
julcnx (2023-12-01 09:23:48+00:00): Hi GreenRunner. thanks for your contribution. Your edit conflicts with existing tag "note=This trail is actually composed of steps cut into the ground for most of its length." Did the surface condition of this path changed ? If not, highway=steps may be appropriate as MTB would be discouraged to use this way.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144647151
julcnx (2024-01-09 05:28:37+00:00): Reverted changeset as the original mapper failed to provide any additional responses.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146051819
i2004 (2023-12-01 11:03:00+00:00): ojala que hoy hagas la 333
mrpulley (2024-02-28 12:32:11+00:00): Can you clarify a couple of details here? Is the track no longer visible on the ground? What damage has there been from the fires/floods (presumably the 2020 fires and 2022 floods)? Is only part of the path damaged rather then the entire path? The reason I ask is that in OSM there are 'lifecycle' tags that are preferred, rather than deleting the ways, which can include marking a visible track as access=no, or adding a disused: prefix to the appropriate tags. As Rodriguez Pass is currently closed, I'm not able to have a look for myself.
mrpulley (2024-03-06 11:49:36+00:00): Just a reminder regarding these questions. On the talk-au mailing list there has been discussion for some time regarding NPWS staff deleting tracks when other lifestyle tags may be more appropriate. Having the correct tagging can also prevent another user re-adding the deleted tracks later.
mrpulley (2024-04-01 05:06:21+00:00): Just another reminder. I'm planning to revert this (in line with similar NPWS edits), possibly with some tag alterations, but it would be helpful to know if you have actually looked at the condition of the track (as opposed to assuming there are no traces left).
mrpulley (2024-04-18 11:25:57+00:00): Changeset has been reverted at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150170434
tyfi (2023-12-01 05:26:02+00:00): There were two concurrencies to keep track of on this long route, E/H and A/E.
Margoulinot (2023-12-01 06:18:07+00:00): Sorry I mixed two changesets
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-08 07:21:29+00:00): DWG revert:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144890561
Dokdo (2025-07-23 03:22:51+00:00): 반달리즘을 하지 마세요
tyfi (2023-12-01 06:32:55+00:00): I am manually combing through an Overpass Turbo query looking for discrepancies between way names and ref tags, and this singular way was identified as Route E for some tigery reason.
MxxCon (2023-12-03 01:38:18+00:00): Hello.
Please split sidewalks at each corner so that each way can be tagged individually. It shouldn't be a single way all the way around a block, but 4.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144649508
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-08 07:25:45+00:00): DWG revert:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144890693
Fillmore (2023-12-30 15:27:30+00:00): Please back out this change. I am a trustee of the land trust that owns beals preserve and have been updating the map to reflect our trails. You have backed out all of my changes.  -- Larry Samberg (Fillmore)
bkil (2023-12-01 09:33:16+00:00): Tisztelt szerkesztő! Ezt visszavontam, mert számtalan objektumot törölt magyarázat vagy csere nélkül, vélelmezhetően véletlenül. Kérem amennyiben még aktuálisak az újonnan felvett itemek, kérem válogassa ki, hogy mi maradjon, és szerkessze fel újra.
BCNorwich (2023-12-01 07:57:08+00:00): Hi, Two intermittent streams you recently added are not connected to the Bavali River at their north ends.

Regards Bernard.
citrula (2023-12-03 03:42:56+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! For addr:street, please use the fully expanded version of the street name. "Aldine Westfield Rd" should instead be "Aldine Westfield Road". Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144650855
Falsernet (2024-06-30 22:21:48+00:00): 129017852
Frans S (2023-12-08 10:21:22+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
A remark. Please pay more attention on mapping of buildings with extensions. Follow the rooflines more precise on those buildings. Now you map just a simple rectangular, while a building can be more complicated.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144651397
arjunaraoc (2023-12-28 05:07:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144651523
Vaidotas (2023-12-04 16:39:34+00:00): Parduotuvę "Aibė" pažymėjote ir tašku, ir ant pastato. Gal užtektų vieno pažymėjimo?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/624653011
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6009810561
HellMap (2023-12-01 10:46:33+00:00): Hi!

Just to let you know, I removed `landuse=military` from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6278058121 . This location is not a military land use location.
richlv (2023-12-01 13:24:50+00:00): Hi, many suspect objects here - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6278058132 is a tree that has tags name=Batuti, operator=Labirinti and tourism=attraction - this looks a lot like https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer .

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3829203580 has a suspect name and fee=no - is it really free for anybody?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6278058144 has name="Siera plate" and tourism=attraction, which seems rather generous, unless it's some notable artwork.

Would be great if you had a chance to discuss this in the Latvian OSM community chat, https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
richlv (2023-12-01 13:26:25+00:00): The node mentioned by Hellmap still has military=obstacle_course, which is likely incorrect. Perhaps something from the "leisure" namespace is a better fit.
richlv (2025-02-13 18:42:21+00:00): Also discussed in a note - https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4625901 .
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-12-01 14:15:07+00:00): 您好，我很理解您站在越南视角对您所编辑的岛屿的密切关注，但OSM的原则是按照实际控制来决定岛屿所属——而对您来说，很遗憾，上述岛屿目前属于中国控制，因此它们的语言应遵从实际控制而使用中文。

我在 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144663830 中回退了您所作的编辑。

请注意，如果您反复进行将名称更改为越南语的行为，我们将向数据工作小组( mailto:data@openstreetmap.org )举报

祝好。

---

Hello, I sincerely understand why you pay close attention to the islands you edited from the perspective of Vietnam, but the principle of OSM is to determine the ownership of the islands based on actual control - and unfortunately for you, the above-mentioned islands are currently controlled by China. , so their language should follow actual control and use Chinese.

I reverted your edits at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144663830.

Please note that if you repeatedly change your name to Vietnamese, we will report it to the Data Working Group (mailto:data@openstreetmap.org)

Best wishes.
silversurfer83 (2023-12-01 09:03:37+00:00): Ja moin :)

sitze grad am Rechner und hab deine PV-Anlagen gesehen. Gute Sache 👍

Eine Bemerkung dazu: Die Eigenschaft "building=roof" ist da nicht korrekt, da sich diese auf ein alleinstehendes Dach, wie zb bei einer Tankstelle bezieht. Was du für die PV-Anlagen auf Dächern benötigst ist "location=roof"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:location

Wenn du einen Punkt setzt und dann bei den EIgenschaften nach "hausdach solaranlage" suchst, bekommst du direkt die korrekten tags gesetzt.

Happy mapping :)

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144652597
forstner-m (2023-12-02 12:30:52+00:00): Hello,
Unfortunately, some polynomials were destroyed here. I tried to repair what I could. Please write in your comment what exactly you did. "Oprava" is quite little. Thanks!
Best regards,
Michael
wolfgang8 (2023-12-01 20:03:44+00:00): Danke! :-)
Necessarycoot72 (2023-12-01 08:49:54+00:00): hi, can you give a reason for the deletion of this military camp?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144653020
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-01 09:00:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1018849026

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bxl-forever (2023-12-01 12:40:28+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for cleaning some addresses.

Please make sure to not erase ref:UrbIS on buildings or addresses (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224681160/history), they are the primary key to addresses in Brussels and should be kept on the database.

Thanks, and have a nice day.
arjunaraoc (2023-12-28 15:09:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144654292
user_5359 (2023-12-06 05:56:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys). Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org!
If you need help, You are welcome!
richlv (2023-12-01 13:11:24+00:00): As far as I understand, "Smartpost" is a brand "Itella" operates under, split it in operator/brand tags.

https://itella.ee/en/private-customer/smartpost/
arjunaraoc (2023-12-28 04:05:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Please update with  names in title case. Check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144654806
Minh Nguyen (2024-03-30 17:38:23+00:00): I think this relation should be restored to a much older version: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3839665/history/23 The hundreds of versions since then had individual roadways as members, mostly in Vietnam. I think that’s why it got into a bad state and eventually got deleted.
Minh Nguyen (2024-03-30 18:15:08+00:00): Restored in changeset 149362992.
Taya_S (2023-12-01 10:07:48+00:00): I removed the natural=volcano tag you added.

Please see the wiki where it says: " However, a feature should not be tagged as a volcano if this status lacks Verifiability: there should be a crater, lava plug or other evidence of an extinct volcanic vent."

Also see the history of this node where  you can see that this was already removed once before 2 years ago.
Frans S (2023-12-08 10:22:07+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144655283
gendy54 (2023-12-26 20:50:20+00:00): changeset modifié: des bâtiments ont été transformés en champs
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144655770
Russ McD (2023-12-10 09:22:54+00:00): Starlord ... again I see bad edits.  You have added the new Hwy 11 dual carriageway section, but the Eastbound carriage of Hwy 11 no longer connects to Hwy 101.
You are a new mapper and I urge you to stop editing major roads until you understand more about the impact of your edits.
I have added U-turns, which are very important when changing single roads to dual carriage.  
The way you had it mapped, it would have forced anyone heading North on the 101 to Den Chai, a massive detour west until they could turn around to head East.
I rode this on Thursday and I know its not the case on the ground. Are you just mapping from a chair without doing any surveys... where are you getting your road information from ?
Russ
StarLord4K (2023-12-10 09:33:22+00:00): Dear sir,

I stopped doing the edits since I received your first message. It was probably my previous edits. This one I looked at google maps aerial map. It was my bad and I refrained from doing the edits since you have messaged me. Thank you again for correcting my mistakes. I hope I wouldn't make more mistakes because I have stopped contributing for the platform. I deeply apologized again.
Russ McD (2023-12-10 09:43:19+00:00): I don't mean to put you off mapping but can you refrain from a/. changing existing data, without messaging the original mapper, and
b/. don't add and data you see on Google as this is not allowed on OSM.  All info must either be gleaned from Bing aerial imagery or surveyed on the ground.
You should carry on , but keep to adding features such as riverbanks, forest areas, & buildings etc., which greatly help the map without risking damage to the more important items.
Cheers.
joost schouppe (2023-12-03 19:52:28+00:00): You deleted some landuse here, I've redrawn it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1228495462/
I don't know why you didn't just enlarge it a bit instead of deleting?
Bear-in-a-box (2023-12-04 14:37:54+00:00): I really have no idea to do this, so I made the changes I did the way I did it. Tried to "untie" the two landuses but did not manage. It always dragged the other landuse with it...
joost schouppe (2023-12-04 17:47:36+00:00): In this case just dragging the landuse would have worked, no? I mean, not the entire polygon, but just the points that form the border. 
Indeed, in the web editor (iD) it's annoying to do edits of polygons. It's one of the things where JOSM has some powers that iD doesn't...
Bear-in-a-box (2023-12-05 09:04:12+00:00): Question: example from this changeset: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144656299

the new house was built in an area that was labeled as "forest". All around it was "residential". But I did not manage to move the polygon correctly or detach the line from the "forest" use and move the whole polygon to adapt to the new use "residental". I know, very difficult to explain...sorry for these basic questions.
joost schouppe (2023-12-06 17:24:56+00:00): That looks good enough to me. Here's a workaround: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/47067/merging-joined-areas-into-single-area/47078
But it's just shift+j in JOSM to merge it to the rest, so I did that now.
joost schouppe (2023-12-03 19:55:17+00:00): Hi,
It kind of makes sense you deleted the building at number 89, but they seem to be rebuilding it already. The address will just stay the same, so the place will now not be findable anymore. Perhaps changing building=house to building=construction would have been better
tuxayo (2023-12-01 22:32:16+00:00): Merci, pile au moment où j'allais chercher où est le centre municipal d'animation ^^
silversurfer83 (2023-12-01 12:58:14+00:00): Grüße nach Mannheim :)

Hinweis zu Öffnungszeiten bei OSM:
Es gibt da ein festes Schema, damit Programme wie Apps die Öffnungszeiten auch lesen können. Details hat das Wiki unter
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

und hier kannst du dir die Werte einfach erstellen lassen, zumindest für die üblichen Fälle:
https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144656867
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-12-01 10:39:24+00:00): Hello,

Why you put motorcycle = no for way_id that allows motorcycle travel through many years? What is your proof?
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-12-01 10:42:02+00:00): Hello, why do you put motorcycle = no everywhere without any proof?
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-12-31 04:54:14+00:00): Hello
Why did you delete the names?
Necessarycoot72 (2023-12-31 21:37:36+00:00): Because every scrub feature in the area had the same name as it. When I translated the name, it came back as "Pious atmosphere" so I thought it was a descriptor not the name of the feature, so I removed it.
Necessarycoot72 (2023-12-31 21:38:54+00:00): If the translation is wrong, I'm willing to read add the names.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2024-01-01 04:55:36+00:00): The name contains in its first part a description, but it is a sub-description of the place, and the tags in OSM may not cover all the natural features that we have in the Saudi desert, so the user may need to add a description to the name, and automatic translations via Google or others do not give you the correct meaning, for example The name of this place is “جو الورع”:
The word “جو” will be translated in the translator as “atmosphere” or “weather,” but they are all wrong and the correct meaning of this word is “A desert place that is lower than the surrounding land and has vegetation.”
As for the other word, “الورع,” it is the name of this place, and I do not know its meaning. It may be for a plant with this name that is widespread in this place, or for the name of a person who had an incident in this place, and so on.
You can also learn many of the descriptions that we use locally to describe the Arabian Desert from this page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B5%D8%B7%D9%84%D8%AD%D8%A7%D8%AA_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%A9_%D9%84%D9%88%D8%B5%D9%81_%D8%A8%D8%B9%D8%B6_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B8%D8%A7%D9%87%D8%B1_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B7%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%B9%D9%8A%D8%A9_%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A9
Necessarycoot72 (2024-01-01 09:05:50+00:00): ""the correct meaning of this word is “A desert place that is lower than the surrounding land and has vegetation.”"

Interesting, so the name is a hyper specific description of the area that doesn't translate well in English. And looking at the wiki link you posted, there is a list of different name that also don't translate well.

But that leaves to ask if the name tag is the best way to document this information. The name is for the name of the feature, it's not a place to describe it. There might not be a specific tag for it in OSM, but another tag like "description" would fit it better.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2024-01-01 11:28:54+00:00): Unfortunately, some place names cannot be deleted from the name field because they are known locally as an integral part of the name. If they were deleted, people would not be able to know the place well, especially in difficult desert areas where describing the nature of the land is important and the OSM tags do not describe it appropriately. Also, these descriptive words are very small and consist of one word and provide a clear meaning to the map browser, as they do not take up a large space in the name field.