piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:43:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
Makeena (2026-06-03 22:50:48+00:00): Not sure what happened here. The edits should all be around Entlisberg
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
Gaung Tebono (2026-06-01 12:34:59+00:00): Tolong dibaca https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary supaya tidak terjadi kesalahpahaman, disini tag primary bukan berarti status jalan kewenangan nya siapa melainkan berdasar "fungsi" dari jalan tersebut, apakah menghubungkan antar wilayah dan pusat strategi atau tidaknya
Gaung Tebono (2026-06-01 13:53:22+00:00): Baca bagian Indonesia pada subjudul International equivalence:

"Usually this road is used as the main route connecting the surrounding areas. Even though it is primary, it does not necessarily mean that its authority falls under the provincial government because many roads under the authority of regencies or cities also have the same function as this provincial road."

Baca lalu terjemahkan supaya paham dan tidak war suntingan lagi 🙏🏻
MappingMore (2026-06-03 05:12:23+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset ID:183572832
Comino (2026-06-01 12:33:12+00:00): Hi,

Can you provide evidence of how you verified Bitcoin acceptance? Their social media accounts do not mention Bitcoin, and the merchant does not respond when I inquire about this via email.

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
Comino (2026-06-01 13:25:03+00:00): Thanks for sending pictures as proof!

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
Tomas Straupis (2026-06-01 13:06:38+00:00): Čia gyva duomenų bazė, tai nereikia į ją žaidimų mesti :-)
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:43:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
Lazaradiskovic (2026-06-01 13:05:02+00:00): Lol
arjunaraoc (2026-06-02 00:09:52+00:00): Hello Harsha5141000,  This is second warning  to you to make edit comment meaningful. You have updated few settlements as hamlets. How does edit comment "Road data was added for proper live tracking of buses" meaningful?  This is not helpful to other mappers who are interested in reviewing edits.  If you continue for one more day like this, your accounted will be reported to DWG and you may lose your editing ability, even if you change to a new account.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183497815
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 04:03:12+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185571112
Henri97 (2026-06-09 18:41:53+00:00): Hallo Landratsamt Heilbronn,

schön, dass ihr offenbar in OSM das Radnetz erfasst. Ich habe gesehen, dass in diesem Changeset der type der  Relation auf type=route gesetzt wurde (siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11083477/history/199 ). Zuvor war dies korrekterweise type=network, da es sich ja um ein Radnetz und keine Radroute handelt. Auch wenn ich die Absicht nicht kenne, im Sinne der Regel „Don't tag for the renderer“ sollte dies weiterhin type=network (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:network) sein. Bitte ändere es entsprechend zurück oder begründe, warum es nicht so sein sollte.

Viele Grüße
Henri
KevinRShay (2026-06-01 13:04:57+00:00): I recorded this video as an evidence that this path exists: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iOgk_zmzQGKu67Pt6rgLLX0-heLqcat2/view?usp=sharing

Here's the route i walked: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UFb3Uzj_mc_C88YM0iR2V4ugOgdb5iRw/view?usp=sharing
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 04:03:13+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185571112
nevw (2026-06-02 08:13:45+00:00): Hi, the opening hours format is not correct, case needs correcting too.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening%20hours?uselang=en-GB
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-20 17:28:30+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186073633
luporr (2026-06-01 13:04:42+00:00): Anpassung analog zur Bergedorfer Straße, für die das zwischen Eiffestraße und Anschluss A1 genau so attribuiert ist.
kadiwa (2026-06-28 16:38:13+00:00): Ich kann das nachvollziehen, aber (nur zur Info) es gibt andere Mapper, die hier gerne highway=primary haben wollen: changeset/164298272
luporr (2026-06-28 17:57:25+00:00): Ich bin ja noch neu dabei, lasse mich da also gerne eines Besseren belehren. :)

Ich fand die Änderung konsequent zur Hervorhebung des Straßentypus. Es gibt div. Navigationstools die auch Modi für 50er Roller haben, die keine Kraftfahrstraßen nutzen dürfen und die auf OSM und eine entsprechende Straßenklassifizierung bei der Berechnung zurückgreifen. Ferner ist die Bergedorfer Straße im Osten von der baulichen Gestaltung auch rein innerstädtisch und ähnlich angelegt, trotz Anschlussstelle (die meines Wissens selbst keine Kraftfahrstraße ist).
kadiwa (2026-06-28 18:19:34+00:00): Wenn Router in Deutschland den Tag highway=trunk benutzen, um Zutrittsrechte herauszufinden, machen sie etwas falsch. trunks haben erstmal dieselben Zutrittsrechte wie primarys. Die Kraftfahrstraße wird stattdessen durch den Tag motorroad=yes angezeigt. Insofern ist die Streitfrage hier vielmehr eine grafische und keine, die sich auf das Routing auswirkt.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 04:03:14+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185571112
Syl (2026-06-01 22:39:38+00:00): Bonjour, pour l'arbre 13901537112, il avait déjà été importé et je l'avais modifié car il s'agit en fait d'un arbuste et non pas d'un arbre : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13167289950/history
Pouvez-vous prendre en compte cette correction dans vos données ?
SIG Echirolles (2026-06-09 12:12:41+00:00): Entendu !
il y a parfois des débats sur la question de caractérisation de l'objet arbre vs arbuste.
Je fais remonter à mes collègues et le cas échéant, nous supprimerons l'identifiant rattaché (sachant qu'effectivement nous ne suivons que les arbres et non les arbustes dans notre référentiel)
Merci pour ta vigilance ;-)
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 04:03:15+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185571112
rajdhani (2026-06-03 10:21:46+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 183585300
Lepidobatrachus (2026-06-01 20:49:05+00:00): Здравствуйте, перед тем как редактировать, изучите пожалуйста правила обозначения объектов в вики. У вас почти все правки ошибочные, либо дублируют или ломают существующие объекты.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 04:03:16+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185571112
Allroads (2026-07-06 11:24:54+00:00): Hoi 
Hier zijn turn restrictions gezet, relations (zie onder), die niet kloppen. Osminspector geeft dat aan.
Het lijkt mij niet logisch, dat hier bebording/belijning is, dat je niet mag afslaan naar een kant.

Wat wilde je uitdrukken?

Groeten Allroads.
nico-tine (2026-07-12 10:18:34+00:00): Hallo,
Het waren ten onrechte aangbrachte eigenschapen van gewone bos/graspaden. Ik heb het gecorrigeerd. Bedankt voor de aanwijzing.
Groeten,
Nico-Tine
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 04:03:17+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185571112
mavl (2026-06-10 06:44:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906936 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 04:03:18+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185571112
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 04:03:19+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185571112
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 04:03:20+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185571112
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 04:03:21+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185571112
bxl-forever (2026-06-01 15:28:52+00:00): ## REVERTED CHANGESET
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
Leo Slager (2026-06-01 19:25:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2026-06-01 19:28:37+00:00): review:
Dat de hotel funktie op de kaart komt is oké.
Het hotel toevoegen aan de routerelaties is echter niet toegestaan.
Daarmee wordt de continuiteit van de routes aangetast en dat is niet wenselijk.

ik pas het even aan.
skorasaurus (2026-06-02 21:08:51+00:00): thanks billl.
Fraxi (2026-06-01 13:56:03+00:00): Здравейте!
Линкът, който е даден за source:geometry, не е актуален.
OC Stoyanov (2026-06-02 08:42:30+00:00): Благодаря, този линк ще бъде премахнат до завършване на удачен за референция ГИС файл
Herwescheluc (2026-06-02 08:35:36+00:00): Hello, JJ_P!

I don’t know where you’re from, so I’ll write this in English.

Which tool showed you errors regarding overlaps? I hadn’t received any notifications until now. But I have since today: https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=14&lat=50.67854&lon=8.30476& item=0000%2C0001%2C1010%2C1040%2C1050%2C1060%2C1070%2C1080%2C1090%2C1100%2C1110%2C1120%2C1140%2C1150% 2C1160%2C1170%2C1180%2C1190%2C1200%2C1210%2C1220%2C1221%2C1230%2C1240%2C1250%2C1270%2C1280%2C1290% 2C1300%2C1310%2C2010%2C2020%2C2030%2C2040%2C2060%2C2080%2C2090%2C2100%2C2110%2C2120%2C2130%2C2150% 2C2160%2C3xxx%2C4xxx%2C5xxx%2C6xxx%2C7010%2C7011%2C7012%2C7020%2C7050%2C7051%2C7070%2C7080%2C7090%2C7100% 2C7110%2C7120%2C7130%2C7150%2C7160%2C7170%2C7190%2C7220%2C7240%2C7250%2C8xxx%2C9xxx&level=1%2C2%2C3&loc=18/50. 68507/8.302747

Until yesterday, the “area without descriptive tags” had valid tagging: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice#Linear_ways_and_areas. Why did you change that? As the area under the bridge is also in use, it should remain there.

If I’d known what the error(s) were, I’m sure I could have fixed it.

I’m not happy with your changes; please tell me how you came to this decision and how you intend to resolve these new issues now!

Regards from Herborn

Andreas
JJ_P (2026-06-02 13:42:43+00:00): Hello, Andreas!
I apologize if my edits seemed bad to you.  The area with the road tags overlapped with other roads, and I tried to fix it. Perhaps the area under the bridge should be tagged to indicate that this area is covered?I apologize for upsetting you!
Herwescheluc (2026-06-02 16:29:51+00:00): Hello again,

I’m not really upset, just a bit disappointed that someone else has spotted a mistake I didn’t see or couldn’t see. So, first of all, thank you for your reply, but I’d also like to ask this question, which is really important to me: How did you spot the mistake? What tool did you use? Only if I can check it myself using that tool does it make sense to rebuild it, which shouldn’t take long.

Best regards,

Andreas
JJ_P (2026-06-03 13:02:50+00:00): Hello again, Andreas ! I haven't used any kind of tool, but I try to rely on the osm wiki and make sure that buildings and roads don't overlap each other. I'm sure you'll do everything right! Good luck with that!
jbcharron (2026-06-01 17:53:57+00:00): Hi,
Di you have check, if you have the right to use data from q park website to contribute to osm?
5m4u9 (2026-06-01 19:48:10+00:00): hola, que bien que añadiste en inicio/fin de las sendas. 

También añadiste un "area de descanso" pero eso es para autos (áreas paralelas a las carreteras). Creo que es mejor un picnic_site.
MassCartog (2026-06-04 12:41:51+00:00): Hi Welcome to OSM. Thanks for your work updating the map! One note, if a road is unnamed, just leave the name field blank, and if its private set the access tags to access=private instead. Routing engines use the access tags to figure out if it should send people down those roads.
5m4u9 (2026-06-01 22:27:28+00:00): Hola, bienvenid@ y gracias por mejorar el mapa de sucre, hace mucha falta...
Tim Grose (2026-06-11 17:18:39+00:00): Hi. Is this road actually called "Goods" ? I suspect it is describing a purpose of it which could also be for deliveries. "When not to use" at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name may well apply and, if so, should be left blank.
rarad74 (2026-06-02 06:01:21+00:00): Salut. Nu mai folosi imaginile BING deoarece sunt mai vechi de 12 ani. Deja au secat o parte din baltile desenate de tine. In plus imaginile Bing sunt si prost pozitionate in zona Pitestiului. Foloeste ESRI Standard pe viitor.
yigruzeltil (2026-06-05 10:14:15+00:00): @rarad74 Salut. In editorul iD nu se vede de cand dateaza hartile. De asemenea, imaginile ESRI par sa aiba o rezolutie mai mica, dar din cate imi pot da seama, contururile sunt inca acolo. Nu stiu cum se marcheaza un parau ca fiind mai mult sau mai putin secat dar cu albie inca bine conturata. Cand am trecut anul trecut prin zona Calea Craiovei/Strada Princ. Geamana, inca se vedea un pic de apa cel putin pe acea portiune.
Leo Slager (2026-06-01 19:30:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-22 03:48:39+00:00): As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality of your mapping and avoid consequences for your account and the features you map. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Fixed malformed/SEO tagging (addr:street=*, mobile=*) for POI in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186153394
MappingMore (2026-06-02 09:40:31+00:00): Revert of  183499604
mueschel (2026-06-04 18:00:39+00:00): Hi,
you added "dgv=no" here - did you mean "hgv=no"?
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-06-05 11:28:53+00:00): Hi, the previous mapper was added earlier, I only edited the highway tag.
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-06-05 11:36:44+00:00): and the lanes tag more
topius (2026-06-02 14:31:27+00:00): Hi Patrik_B,
It seems logical to unhook the admin boundary when the river changes, but according to the organic law on provincial boundaries, the river is the boundary. If the river changes, so does the admin boundary. I will hook the admin boundary back onto the newly drawn river sections.
Thanks, 
topius
Patrik_B (2026-06-03 06:49:29+00:00): Hello topius,
thank you for noticing and explaining it to me. I really appreciate that! :) Next time I will know. I might reach out to you in the future if I will have similar situations that I am not fully sure about in PNG area if that would be okay with you? Thank you!
Best regards,
Patrik
topius (2026-06-03 10:39:36+00:00): Yes, feel free to reach out to me.
Best, 
topius
Szymson (2026-06-01 15:39:29+00:00): Błędnie, obie nazwy są pisane z dużej litery:
 https://powmed.pl/
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100076247973380&locale=pl_PL
czebureks (2026-06-01 16:26:59+00:00): Nie są to akronimy, podobnie jak "Gryf" w Wejherowie. W razie potrzeby można dodać zapis wersalikami do klucza official_name, jeżeli faktycznie taki zapis widnieje w dokumentach.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Proper_name_spelling
rarad74 (2026-06-01 15:49:14+00:00): Bine de stiut. :P
Se putea pune si un tag de POI - de meat, food, etc ca sa poata fi gasit la cautare mai usor.
chinook17 (2026-06-15 11:11:49+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez ajouté un doublon. La voie cyclable est déjà cartographiée sur rue. Pouvez-vous effacer la piste cyclable que vous avez créée?
Merci!
Szymson (2026-06-01 16:04:44+00:00): Zaś błędnie: https://www.facebook.com/pgprgryf.org/?locale=pl_PL
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-01 16:10:06+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is this name real?
Home <3 (1264198593), v2
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-05 23:30:22+00:00): Driveways entering buildings can also be connected with a node and tagged entrance=garage
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183506754
Jebel_Hafeet (2026-06-08 15:34:55+00:00): Thank you for your review and suggestion. I have made the corrections per your recommendation. I will keep this in mind in my future edits as well
Wildsharky (2026-06-02 11:50:16+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:183538335
pwbriggs (2026-06-01 18:59:29+00:00): Ref https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5320769.

I suspect a pokemon-related type of edit, but this could also be well-intentioned? I'll close that note and we'll see what the user has to say.
Szymson (2026-06-01 16:16:44+00:00): Dlaczego cały budynek został oznaczony jako Apartament Marina, skoro na stronie jest informacja o jedynie jednym lokalu 48 m²?
Szymson (2026-06-01 16:17:13+00:00): Do poprawy jeszcze raz.
SlowStoryTime (2026-06-01 16:21:07+00:00): Próbowałem dodać pineske i zaznaczyło mi cały budynek myślałem że tak jest prawidłowo. Pozdrawiam
Szymson (2026-06-01 16:26:21+00:00): Spróbuj ponownie jeszcze raz, tym razem jako pojedynczy punkt.
SlowStoryTime (2026-06-01 16:33:31+00:00): dziękuję dodałem mam nadzieję że tym razem prawidłowo
Solaris07 (2026-06-01 23:36:51+00:00): Thank you for refining the fire pit
ScarlettB (2026-06-02 06:57:59+00:00): @Fizzie-DWG 炼化火坑 炼化火坑 炼化火坑 This is a premediated test of mentions within changeset comments  炼化火坑 炼化火坑 炼化火坑 炼化火坑 炼化火坑 炼化火坑
wireguy (2026-06-04 16:46:19+00:00): Razvan, Welcome to OSM.  Nice work  breaking up the buildings and adding addresses.  I added the height info from the philly db.  I also broke up the other buildings in the area, but the address info was not in the db.   Local knowledge FTW!  Keep mapping.
Szymson (2026-06-01 16:13:06+00:00): To nie jest oficjalna nazwa tego miejsca
Szymson (2026-06-01 16:14:52+00:00): Poza tym jaki jest sens dublowania plaży jako obszar i jako punkt jednocześnie?
Szymson (2026-06-01 16:18:15+00:00): Miejsca publiczne typu plaża nie służą do wstawiania linków do laurek reklamowych własnych biznesów.
muralito (2026-06-02 01:14:17+00:00): Hola. Va review. Todo bien parece quedó dese el punto de vista logico, pero el tema es que eso es una barra, naturalmente el arroyo cambia todo el tiempo, segun la foto que mires donde desemboca... hay otras fotos que muestran la desembocadura como 300 o 400 metros.
dcapillae (2026-06-01 18:04:17+00:00): Hola.

Gracias por los cambios.

He hecho una pequeña corrección: para un parking, la etiqueta adecuada es «amenity=parking».

La etiqueta «amenity=parking_space» se utiliza para mapear plazas de aparcamiento individuales, siempre que estén claramente señalizadas en el terreno.

En el wiki hay una guía para principiantes, por si fuera de interés: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_de_principiantes.

También tenemos una página dedicada a Málaga: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:M%C3%A1laga
Szymson (2026-06-01 16:37:18+00:00): No już lepiej, ale oficjalnie nie ma takiej miejscowości (wartość addr:city) jak Darłówko Wschodnie:
https://mdarlowo.e-mapa.net/
Normalnie to miejsce pod Darłowo podlega
Szymson (2026-06-01 16:39:54+00:00): Kod pocztowy też jest błędny
SlowStoryTime (2026-06-01 16:41:49+00:00): jak to moge poprawić ?
mueschel (2026-06-07 16:55:29+00:00): Hi,
something seems to be wrong here - you added several peaks with strange tags like 
Gullmarsberg= 60 m.

Please have a look and check that.
dmjab13 (2026-06-01 19:29:12+00:00): please don't submit changesets that span this many states, make them in separate batches by state
AriAlvarez (2026-07-09 23:23:01+00:00): Oopsie daisy, my mistake
LordGarySugar (2026-06-03 17:52:52+00:00): Thanks for clarifying the access here, for reference access=private is best in this scenario, access=no is more for when it is physically impossible to use the highway, or for restrictions imposed by the highways agency. If any other tracks or service roads around Tregassow Farm are private, feel free to add access=private to them too.
VictorIE (2026-06-03 13:55:23+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1525227288/

I don't think there is  abuilding here. It's been vacant a long time.

You can just about see the gap in the buildings here: https://api.panoramax.xyz/en/index?focus=pic&map=17/53.345121/-6.27033&pic=4440151a-8ce4-4c56-b337-ceadb24f2ef8&seq=a73000dd-b319-4b85-9c09-f94671f79b2d&speed=250&theme=default&users=default&xyz=149.16/4.28/30
Robbo247 (2026-06-03 14:11:56+00:00): There are the ruins of the existing building there,  i.e. the front wall of the ground floor.  https://maps.app.goo.gl/ejSZzN6GQ543637T7
Sylabowy Kot (2026-06-01 17:31:13+00:00): Coś się skrzaczyło ze starym chodnikiem przy Idzikowskiego.
Sparrow1029 (2026-06-01 17:26:59+00:00): I didn't intend to add the US-285 relation -- unsure if that was correct...
fortera_au (2026-06-02 05:36:09+00:00): Hi, you've drawn a sidewalk over the top of the road, this is probably incorrect. The other ones don't match up to aerial imagery too.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183511213
monotar (2026-07-18 23:44:51+00:00): Hallo,

ich setze deine Änderung bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45937704#map=19/50.968833/13.596670&layers=D zurück. Du machst diesen Fehler immer wieder, deshalb erkläre ich es dir: Bitte beachte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Access_hierarchy_simple2.png
D.h. Blaue Schilder im Zusammenhang mit Zusatzschildern führen immer zu access=*, denn ein Landwirt darf den Weg auch mit dem Pferd benutzen. Wenn du motor_vehicle=* setzt, ist es dem Landwirt nicht möglich, den Weg mit Pferd oder Kutsche zu benutzen.
Leo Slager (2026-06-02 10:42:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Glassman (2026-06-01 23:41:51+00:00): If the road isn't separated by the two islands, then the road should converge. Can you review this edit? Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183511823
Schmizzler (2026-06-04 20:11:17+00:00): As I drive through this area, there is the two islands that separate the east and west travel lanes. The area in between the two islands is asphalted but is mainly for aesthetics. There's no dedicated turn lanes or anything so the travel lanes just stay going straight, which the previous lines showed as like an X-shape and reminded me more of a double-diamond interchange. Is there another way to show that there is asphalt in between two islands while not turning it into an X?