piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Peter W34 (2024-03-29 09:32:47+00:00): Hi Tech Dec. I'll go and check it out in the next couple of days. It is not far from home. I may have thought I could see through there and got my streets mixed. Peter
Peter W34 (2024-04-01 04:28:06+00:00): Hi Tech Dec. Checked this today. There is definitely a grass passage between the houses and fences. So people can go from the street into the park. Peter
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-04 02:00:42+00:00): Please do not delete then readd features.  There is significant interest in preserving the history of the features.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145784201
jcarlson (2024-03-01 04:21:07+00:00): what is the purpose of these relations? unincorporated areas are defined by inner rings of administrative boundaries, they don't need their own relations
citrula (2024-01-02 19:41:11+00:00): Please don't copy information from wikipedia into the description tag. Description should be original work which helps users of the map understand what is being represented. Wikipedia's license requires attribution as well.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145784416
k408 (2024-01-03 02:12:11+00:00): Thanks citrula, I removed the Wikipedia text from the description tag.
citrula (2024-01-03 02:45:25+00:00): Thanks for the quick fix, and great work on the POIs in Quitaque :)
KoiAndBlueBird (2024-01-08 04:30:36+00:00): Same problem here: 
1. Your mapped buildings are not rectangular.
2. In many cases, there are no visible buildings where you mapped them. Those will need to be deleted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145784665
KoiAndBlueBird (2024-01-08 04:26:15+00:00): Hello, thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap!

How do you know that those buildings you mapped are really there? On the satellite imagery, there isn't really much to see. 

If they are there, they need to be rectangular (in most cases). In iD, you can achieve this by selecting the buildiing and pressing "Q".
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145784693
fortera_au (2024-01-02 05:52:48+00:00): Are these private, or would customers be a better tag? Last time I was in the area these were available for customers of the adjacent businesses.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145784729
user_19382120 (2024-01-03 14:35:40+00:00): Thankyou, I saw Private parking on streetview, and brain just copied what it saw. Lizard brain.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-01-09 05:40:23+00:00): 我在 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146049273 中回退了您的

* 145782878
* 145785562 (this)

两个changeset

并在 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146052017 中重画，您有时间的话可以重新看看重画后的实例是怎么使用道路等级和各种标签来表示各种区域的
eggie (2024-01-02 07:02:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution. 

Greetz,
eggie
uprkos (2025-11-26 22:07:20+00:00): Całkowita fikcja. Usunąłem wszystkie "bary".
gscholz (2024-01-02 08:20:45+00:00): Hi Реdактор,
the here added gassland widely overlaps with the existing wood areas:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145785802

Can you please fix this?

I recommend to study the documentation about how to edit multigon polygons:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Kind regards
Guido
Реdактор (2024-01-02 08:52:33+00:00): Это сложно исправить, я знаю что он с лесными массивами перекрывается, но в этом ничего такого нет
gscholz (2024-01-02 09:23:02+00:00): Actually this is a serious error and the results any map renderer delivers in this case (wood areas on top of or under of the grassland) is just arbitrary.

Please keep in mind the error effects _any_ map renderer, not only the Mapnik view of the standard Openstreetmap.

Fixing this is quite easy, but you may select JOSM as editor for this task, as it is much more capable for editing relations.
Guido
Реdактор (2024-01-02 09:40:15+00:00): Ладно, учтём на будущее
eggie (2024-01-02 07:05:34+00:00): Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution. 
Gr eggie
Dodko (2024-01-03 10:29:36+00:00): V Bratislave do adresy treba pridať
addr:suburb=Staré Mesto a podľa možnosti ju dať radšej do budovy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3022779443/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58374173
aceman444 (2024-01-03 22:41:04+00:00): Ano mate pravdu, ale teraz som sa tomu nechcel venovat.
Dakujem Vam za priebezne doplnanie suburb a ref:minvskaddress do existujucich adries.
gscholz (2024-01-02 08:13:59+00:00): 

Hi Реdактор,
the here added gassland widely overlaps with the existing wood areas:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145786445

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2024-01-02 08:14:25+00:00): Hi Реdактор,
the here added gassland widely overlaps with the existing wood areas:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145786822

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Armand_Rose (2024-01-02 15:14:55+00:00): can anyone custom satellite image
arjunaraoc (2024-01-04 04:46:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
Check my update for minor fixes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145863864
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145786987
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-02 07:38:55+00:00): This CS resolves duplicate tagging of multipolygons.
LockOnGuy (2024-01-02 09:12:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by changeset 145789416 and the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 145787822 by uid=20489374 . The user removed boundary=administrative from Baghdad boundary relation.
rarad74 (2024-01-02 16:16:29+00:00): Salut. Te rog sa citesti pe wiki regulile de utilizare a denumirilor/nume in Romania. Trebuie sa pui si Strada/Aleea, Bulevard, etc. in denumire, dar fara abrevieri. In cazul de fata nu pui doar Rampei ci Strada Rampei. Multumesc.
eggie (2024-01-02 16:18:29+00:00): reverted by changeset #145805171

Voorlopig teruggedraaid 
De A58 heeft ook wegnummer A27

MVG
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-23 14:21:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398440549/history

Is it still branded as Coles Express/Reddy Express? (brand, brand:wikidata)

Some other source claims it is Shell branded and it has brand=Shell leaving me quite confused
mrpulley (2025-01-23 22:45:25+00:00): It's been a while since I've been there, but the Shell / Coles Express stations seem to have consistent signage, with the Shell logo on top, and Coles Express below this (I've generally used Shell for amenity=fuel, and Coles Express for the associated convenience store). I looked at the Bathurst Shell/Coles Express today on the way to work, and this is how it is signed. Google images (not a valid source!) show similar signage in Port Macquarie. Hope that helps.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-27 03:20:17+00:00): > I've generally used Shell for amenity=fuel, and Coles Express for the associated convenience store

Then maybe this fuel station should get name=Shell ? and it brand link go to Shell ?

Or maybe should get brand=Shell;Coles Express and brand:wikidata listing both?
mrpulley (2025-01-27 03:59:19+00:00): I'm thinking the first option, but I'll ask the Australian tagging list what they suggest.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-30 16:32:51+00:00): Thanks! It seems to be https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2025-January/thread.html#17350 ("Question re Coles Express service stations ")
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-15 22:29:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152740214, 152740288, 152740274, 152740234, 152740192, 152740169, 152740167, 152740249, 152740178 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions by Hamilton 44/Delta Evas ALL, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16207
totera (2024-01-02 09:29:12+00:00): Ciao Sergio, hai aggiunto quattro volte lo stesso negozio...
Sergio Martelli (2024-01-02 10:13:29+00:00): Ciao, buongiorno, sì hai ragione, perché già ne vedevo altri 2 in posizione errata. Quindi li ho eliminati, ma credo ci voglia un po’ di tempo prima che non si vadano più…giusto? Poi volevo eliminare altri 2 , il castellare è la chiocciola, perché sono ristoranti chiusi da molto tempo, ma non ci sono riuscito. Scusami.
urbalazs (2024-01-03 08:38:21+00:00): Szia Turboscsiga! Kérlek, hogy ne szedd le az épületekről a házszámokat, ha már egyszer rajtuk van. Amiket most leszedtél, azok egy részét én mértem fel, és nekem nem tetszik az, hogy különálló pontként szerepelteted a házszámot. Ez felvet egy további problémát is, miszerint ha valaki erre jár a StreetComplete alkalmazással, akkor a program megkérdezi tőle, hogy mi az épület házszáma, mert nincs az épületen szám. Kérlek, hogy tedd vissza a házszámokat az épületere, és ne csinálj felesleges munkát a többi szerkesztőnek.
eggie (2024-01-02 09:46:04+00:00): Beste Arie... Ik vraag me af of dit wel correct is. Dit ivm met de doorlopende zelfde wegnummers.

Niet elke verbinding is een link. Heb je dit gecommuniceerd met de oorspronkelijke mapper?
Graag reactie
MVG
eggie
Arie Roeling (2024-01-02 13:39:37+00:00): volgens mij is dit wel correct. het zijn twee banen die naar rechts afslaan van de A2 naar de A59.
eggie (2024-01-02 13:46:20+00:00): .... maar het is ook een doorlopende A59..
Er is een stuk snelweg met een dubbel nummer. A59 en A2.
Ik heb dit probleem even doorgestuurd naar een van de inframappers van het grote wegennet.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2024-01-02 16:15:18+00:00): reverted by changeset #145805059

Voorlopig even teruggedraaid.

MVG
eggie
JeroenvanderGun (2024-01-02 17:47:54+00:00): Dit stuk was inderdaad gewoon motorway in plaats van motorway_link omdat het onderdeel van de doorgaande A59 is.
user_101460 (2024-01-04 06:44:03+00:00): こんにちは。震災があって慌てて書いてるのかも知れませんが落ち着いて書いていただけないでしょうか。
能登建販やオーテクスといった会社のエリアにbuildin=yesタグが付いています。そしてlayer=-1というタグも付いているので、これでは地下に沈んだ建物といういう意味になってしまいます。
そうなると地図としての意味がなくなってしまうので、書くときは確認しながら書いてください。
よろしくお願いします。
swinetown (2024-01-02 09:36:15+00:00): *of a, turns out I can't spell
urbalazs (2024-01-03 07:15:05+00:00): Szia Qszi! Ebben a módosításcsomagban nagybetűsre állítottad a Barázda köz 2/a házszámát (most Barázda köz 2/A). Nem tudom, hogy Pécsen van-e erre helyi rendelet, de Budapesten van rendelet arra, hogy a házszámokat kisbetűkkel, az azonos telken lévő épületeket pedig nagybetűkkel jelöljük. Azaz Petőfi út 1/a vagy Petőfi út 1. A épület. Ahhoz, hogy egységes legyen a térkép, javaslom, hogy te is ezt használd, és arra kérlek, hogy a házszámokban lévő betűt minden esetben kisbetűvel írd. Köszi!
Taya_S (2024-01-02 10:59:24+00:00): I reverted this changeset because the paths are plainly visible on imagery

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145793046
hwman (2024-01-10 10:52:44+00:00): Wieso wurde aus landuse farmland auf einmal landuse cemetery?
mischa13 (2024-01-10 10:58:48+00:00): Hallo hwman.
Definitiv ein Fehler!! War so nicht beabsichtigt! Ich stelle wieder um!
In der Realität ist ca. 300m südwestlich von Oberfischbach ein kleiner Friedhof. Grüße, Mischa
mischa13 (2024-01-10 11:07:49+00:00): Hab's wieder auf farmland gesetzt. Vermutlich ist mir das bei der Bearbeitung in Go Map! passiert. Dort wird das falsche Cementary-Farmland ab einer gewissen Zoomstufe nicht mehr dargestellt, bzw. als eifarbige Fläche. Der Friedhof jedoch korrekt als Cementary... Werde mit Go Map! erstmal keine Flächen mehr anfassen...
Taya_S (2024-01-02 10:51:47+00:00): Hi, please use either English or Dutch when mapping in the Netherlands.
Sören66 (2024-01-03 06:24:33+00:00): This is not a bike path
Harald Hartmann (2024-01-03 15:45:30+00:00): Darf man fragen, warum du "addr:street" an einen Wegweiser getaggt hast?
Dodko (2024-03-30 09:43:30+00:00): Nemali by byť transformátory značené ako
power=transformer
tak ako je tu
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11274302099

namiesto
power=substation
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54365402
luky89 (2024-04-02 07:34:34+00:00): Neviem. Myslím že je to dosť nejednoznačné. Niektoré tieto budovy majú súpisné čislo, iné nie ale to je druhoradé. Či je to budova alebo kiosk stále je to len transformátor a jeho rozvádzač pre mňa ale čo som hľadal tak to asi tak nebude. Pri značený som vychadzal z wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dsubstation a pozrel som si to ako je to značená napr. v Prahe a tam je ako substation https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49831482.
Syl (2024-01-02 11:37:36+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé la suppression du nom. Même si le commerce n'existe plus c'est ainsi que le bâtiment est appelé.
Philetjosie (2024-01-02 14:32:13+00:00): Ok, alors désolé. Sur place, je n'ai vu aucune mention du nom de ce bâtiment. Par contre, j'avais rajouté un tag: "shop = vacant", pour indiquer que c'était vide. Il faudrait peut-être le laisser, non ?
Syl (2024-01-02 15:37:35+00:00): J'avais vu pour "shop = vacant" et je l'ai laissé.
Merci pour vos contributions, bonne fin de journée.
mcliquid (2024-01-03 15:08:28+00:00): Hi and thank you for your edit!
We have aerial images with 10cm resolution in Vorarlberg, which are way better than the Bing satellite image.
You can select the VoGIS aerial image in iD in the background list in the right menu. Happy Mapping!
philippec (2024-01-02 19:34:55+00:00): Wingene zwembad.
Is de AED naar binnen gebracht ?
Of gaat er over een andere AED ?

Hier ziet u het nut van Mapillary.
philippec (2024-10-29 23:29:26+00:00): Die aan de Als buiten is er niet meer.
Zie mapillary.
Edelsalami (2024-01-30 19:36:59+00:00): Hallo Streetview247, ich habe die falsch von dir eingetragene Flächennutzung korrigiert. Das Gelände nennt sich sich "Südpark", ist aber großteils ein Gewerbegebiet und kein Park im Sinne von OSM: also KEINE Grünfläche zur Erholung mit Bänken etc. Falls du das anders siehst, so lege bitte dies dar. Übrigens ist der Verweis auf Google-Inhalte als Quelle bei OSM streng untersagt. Gruß
eggie (2024-01-02 11:16:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Je combineerd adresnode 2 en 4?
Nr 6a heb je verwijderd. Bestaat dat adres niet meer?
Klot de gebouwomtrek nog wel?
Waarom? 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-01-02 11:21:41+00:00): warnings:crossing_ways:building-building

Geen binnenplaats meer?
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=02-01-2023&loc=51.58767%2C4.778755%2C19z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-09-30&acqid=20230930_103501_PNEO-03_1_1&sensor=Pleiades-NEO
jpennycook (2024-01-02 22:46:55+00:00): I get the impression the councils (Woking and Surrey) plus Sustrans didn't consider the impact of the redevelopment of the town centre on the cycling routes or the need to put up signs (the Pluto LCN has been broken for years after the fire station moved).
Richard (2024-01-03 18:23:46+00:00): Sadly would be typical - councils often seem to think of cycle routes as a bauble to soak up some capital funding rather than something that needs ongoing revenue funding for maintenance/upgrades!
eggie (2024-01-02 15:30:14+00:00): Beste... Wanneer iets niet meer klopt kun je het beste een terugmelding doen richting Kadaster. Dat via deze site.. Alles is immers import vanuit de BAG en bij een update worden je aanpassingen weer overschreven.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=molenstraat+6+breda&objectId=0758100000050790&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=112851.0613547627&geometry.y=400046.6772760448&zoomlevel=14.779797323271017&bijbehorendeAdressen=Pand

MVG
eggie
fortera_au (2024-01-02 11:21:33+00:00): Hey, separate nodes should be created for the stores, the name should represent the building as a whole.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145793552
CHMOD700 (2024-01-02 11:36:46+00:00): Ah, thanks!
pyram (2024-04-12 12:48:57+00:00): Hi HAmap,

das mit dem Zusatz "driveway" hatten wir schon einmal:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141562688

Den Zusatz halte ich hier ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31276577/history ) nach wie vor für nicht korrekt.
HAmap (2024-04-12 13:22:59+00:00): ja, hat mich damals überzeugt und tut es auch heute. Hab ich scheinbar im Halbschlaf zurückgeändert ... keine Ahnung, ist mir nicht aufgefallen. Danke für den neuen Hinweis!
Thibaultmol (2024-10-02 12:14:06+00:00): Hi, I noticed that the image of the firehydrant was applied to many cyclepaths here. is that intentional? https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1S4t
Carto'Cité (2024-10-07 19:25:37+00:00): Hi,
Yes it is the signpost that is pointed to help contributors to understand the choices for the cyclepath description.
Thank you for your observations.
Charles
Thibaultmol (2024-10-08 15:06:47+00:00): I think it's not that useful to tag the image on the cyclepath.
Both because that one picture is just a small section and doesn't apply to all of those cyclepaths. And also because cyclepaths usually don't have images like that. They're on Panoramax/Mapillary and people can see them there. but because they're so long, it doesn't really make sense to tag them.

What i woulud however recommend is that you add the panoramax tag on the fire hydrant itself, that's much more useful. It also allows someone looking at the fire hydrant to then immedialty see a picture of it. Like so: https://dev.mapcomplete.org/hailhydrant.html?z=16.8&lat=50.89155389376086&lon=4.556349331135266&background=osm#node/1641938527
Syl (2024-01-02 12:54:30+00:00): Bonjour, est-ce que le poteau indicateur ressemble à ça ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:information%3Dguidepost#Exemples
Hirscho (2024-01-03 17:07:40+00:00): Bonjour, en forme oui mais pas en couleur - c'est du bois noir avec quelques marques vertes. Je n'ai pas encore exploré le troisième sentier auquel il mène, mais je pense que c'est un mur d'escalade.
Syl (2024-01-03 18:50:56+00:00): Merci pour ces précisions, je viens de corriger le type de l'objet.
Hirscho (2024-01-04 07:18:36+00:00): Merci
gscholz (2024-01-02 12:14:09+00:00): Hi danlessa,
I have sorted the relation items so they have a proper sequence now:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145795420
LokNeko (2024-01-21 10:01:37+00:00): 珠海10路公交从城规珠海站出来之后是经过拱北口岸隧道，然后走水湾路和侨光路，才到桂花南巴士站（和32路很像）
luisforte (2024-01-02 12:18:20+00:00): Olá
Está claramente convencionado que os nomes das vias não são abreviados. Porquê corrigir um nome abreviando-o?
LF
eggie (2024-01-02 15:42:17+00:00): De binnenplaats heb ik hersteld met een inner MP.  Je zou anders niets zien. 
MVG
eggie
fortera_au (2024-01-17 02:51:05+00:00): Hi there, addr:street tags shouldn't be abbreviated, I've corrected the tag for this changeset.
CHMOD700 (2024-01-17 10:51:12+00:00): Thanks, I'm not even sure what that means or how I did it. But thanks.
fortera_au (2024-01-17 20:54:36+00:00): You had Rd not Road, names should always be written fully, and not shortened to Rd or St for example
CHMOD700 (2024-01-19 00:36:56+00:00): Right, noted ta.
tastrax (2024-01-03 09:31:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
CHMOD700 (2024-01-03 10:37:28+00:00): Ah of course, thanks.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-02 12:20:37+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"profesora Kazimierza Michałowskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11028509002
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11028509004
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11028532906
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293099295

"profesora Tadeusza Kotarbińskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11170432988
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89449206
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89449207
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89449212
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89449221
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89449222
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89449234
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89449274
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293099219
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205638

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WTGZ_ (2024-01-02 13:54:04+00:00): Bloki z adresem profesora Tadeusza Kotarbińskiego, mimo, ze znajdują się troche dalej od głównej ulicy, mają taki adres na 1000%, dróg wewnętrznych nie ma co nazywać.

A wieżowiec przy profesora Kazimierza Michałowskiego też ma na 1000% taki adres, poprawiłem brak nazwy i błędną nazwę ulicy.
NorthCrab (2024-01-07 13:04:29+00:00): Okej!
ivanbranco (2024-08-03 09:38:09+00:00): Hi J-MUC,

these wiki tags seem to belong to this other peak: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/307297671

it's probably a mistake, could you take a look at it? thanks and good mapping
grzegorzmilosz (2024-01-02 12:26:25+00:00): Mapowanie na podstawie filmu na YT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vY9_NgpaVVM jak widać zakaz poruszania się rowerami dotyczy tylko odcinków poza mostami gdzie trzeba prowadzić rower po chodniku dla pieszych a jak jest w rzeczywistości to widać na filmie. Tam gdzie niema ścieżek rowerowych ( po za mostami dałem zasadę dostępności dismount co oznacza że rowerzysta ma zsiąść z roweru i go prowadzić ), a na mostach ścieżki rowerowe są już od kilku miesięcy i tam nie ma zakazu poruszania się rowerami.
maro21 (2024-01-03 22:02:20+00:00): Dlaczego zmieniłeś "foot=designated" na "foot=yes"?

Skąd wniosek, że po mostach można poruszać się rowerem? Obejrzałem nagranie i nie zauważyłem ani znaków pionowych, ani poziomych.
Znaki są za to po zjeździe z mostu Olimpijskiego przed niewyasfaltowaną jeszcze ścieżką.
joost schouppe (2024-04-24 08:22:33+00:00): Hoi Tom,
Als je een huisnummer toevoegt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203715337), voeg dan zeker ook de straat toe. Anders is de informatie eigenlijk niet bruikbaar.
Tom Ameye (2024-04-24 08:34:43+00:00): Je hebt meer dan gelijk. Ik zal het vanaf nu systematisch doen als de straat duidelijk is.
Groeten,
Tom
joost schouppe (2024-04-24 12:03:25+00:00): In geval van twijfel kan je altijd de situatie even bekijken op https://lara.vlaanderen.be/
Ook altijd welkom om te leren gebouwen importeren, dat neemt ook direct de adressen mee.
AndersAndersson (2024-01-22 16:23:55+00:00): Hej!

Jag såg att du lade till highway=path på denna. Stämmer verkligen det? Det ser ut som den passerar många myrar som ser jobbiga ut att gå på.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1234602697
k_b (2024-02-17 20:33:29+00:00): Tack för frågan.
De delar som går utom myrarna är korrekta, har gått där på somrarna så det finns olika stigar.
i år har man lagt om slättvålaspåret och det stämmer nog att det går mer över myrarna på vintern. har tagt bort highway=path, men är osäker på vad som är bättre.
AndersAndersson (2024-02-17 21:25:41+00:00): Tack för svar!
Jag har åkt det på vintern för ett antal å sedan. Så din känsla för hur det är på sommaren är nog bättre än min. :)