piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Paul Berry (2025-10-15 14:22:23+00:00): Hi Dan,

I tagged this as metal, when I jogged through it back in July, because there isn't a tag for "metal substrate with some kind of non-slip dressing applied to it." There are countless footbridges and steps like this so perhaps we should seek guidance as to how to tag, or even propose a new value. If it's literally the *surface* as seen that needs the tag then asphalt is probably the closest match.

Regards,
_Paul_
Dan200 (2025-10-15 16:32:40+00:00): I think you're right that "surface" is the key word here, as that's what your feet/wheels interact with and what ultimately determines whether the suitability of the bridge for travel (it's also the only thing that's trivially verifiable, we don't want to have to start taking core samples of random roads!). In this bridges case, there's an asphalt/tarmac layer across it's whole length: https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/6512139
H4N5-antw (2025-07-19 10:29:36+00:00): ja, mocht iemand met meer seamark-kennis besluiten dat inhoud van die tags toch op kaart hoort kan eenvoudig was: verwijderd. 
Dank, Hans
dónal (2025-07-21 18:40:05+00:00): Hi Sophie131! Is there something specific you wanted reviewed in this changeset?
NieWnen (2025-07-19 00:23:44+00:00): Dzięki!
Tom van Dijk (2025-08-06 19:22:36+00:00): This spans something around 5 long lines through the country. There's clear train of thought here (see what I did there?). So I think it's fine although JOSM does have some changeset splitting capabilities FYI
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169133184
rempshaener (2025-07-19 18:06:03+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe mir nicht alle Änderungen anschauen können, daher nur diese Anmerkungen:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415813659: Wenn man den Gehweg separat erfasst, sollte man auch einen Blick auf die dazugehörige Fahrbahn werfen, hier www.openstreetmap.org/way/543689930. Dort sind begleitende Gehwege mit sidewalk=both erfasst. An den Stellen, wo der Gehweg separat erfasst ist, wäre die Straße aufzutrennen und anzugeben, dass es hier einen separaten Gehweg gibt, d. h.:
sidewalk:right=separate
sidewalk:left=yes

www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415813666: Das leisure=garden ist hier eher unüblich. Verbreitet sind z. B.:
landuse=grass oder
natural=scrub oder
landuse=flowerbed

www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415813664: Hier ist ein Gebäude von einem Gebäude umgeben. Wenn du so etwas erfassen möchtest, solltest du dich z. B. hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Simple_3D_Buildings einlesen.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
PeterCooperJr (2025-07-19 02:58:26+00:00): I *meant* to paste this link, of when the street was actually renamed: https://www.telegram.com/story/news/local/worcester/2012/12/26/city-street-becomes-8216-lois/49193528007/
NeisBot (2025-07-19 01:54:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
nevw (2025-07-19 03:52:49+00:00): Hi, your website lists your business at 23A Barr Street, Camperdown but you have attached this to the M8 Motorway Tunnel. I suggest placing your business listing exactly over the building you operate from. Also add the shop=beauty so it renders on the map.
fortera_au (2025-07-19 10:56:22+00:00): Since this seems to be in the complete wrong location, I've just removed all tags from this node.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169134105
NeisReview (2025-07-19 15:42:54+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169146428

Thanks nevw & fortera_au!
Technotion (2025-11-05 19:50:38+00:00): Are the pathways needed over top the Grove Pedestrian area? That area is considered a pedestrian highway and as far as I am aware routing will work to send you from one path to another as long as it is connected to the area.
UserCurt (2025-11-06 08:50:17+00:00): My first changeset comment from a name I recognize in the area, a nice surprise! Are you asking about the footways within area 1289147022 specifically?

I added the internal paths since the OSM Wiki recommends it: "Area routing can improve and should be combined with linear routing" [1]. Since "Routing through areas only is hardly possible" and "Most routers naïvely route around the perimeter", these ways should help routing through this moderately sized (190m perimeter) pedestrian area.
UserCurt (2025-11-06 08:50:50+00:00): Meant to link these:

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Guidelines_for_pedestrian_navigation#Routing_on_areas

[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area#Routers
joost schouppe (2025-07-29 14:34:23+00:00): Thanks for the help with this task!
I did make several improvements:
- don't duplicate info on the building and the school outline unless you really have to. I removed most tags from the main building
- the school likely only has a French name; and the name tag is always for the local name. So if you needed both a French and English name, it would have been better to add name=(French language name) and name:en=(English name)
- don't use | to separate values in a key. We always use ; to combine values
aweech (2025-08-13 14:58:09+00:00): Hi, do you happen to know when UDOT and the County put up the historical signs? I haven't seen them before, but also it's been a few months since I was in the area.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-08-14 01:01:33+00:00): A good chunk of this route was named "Old Highway 91," which I moved into ref=US 91 Hist. Of course, it's no Historic Route 66, so maybe ref=US 91 Old (for the ways) and network=US:US:Old (for the relation)? The only problem is that I doubt it has any support or usage, for that matter.
Udarian (2025-07-19 04:47:31+00:00): the two tags added to this object 
"
addr:housenumber=400
name=ParkLine Miami South
"
simply do not give enough information about this object, from what I can tell from some cursory searches on duck duck go this seems to be a apartment so it would needs tags for that. 

There is also the issue that you put source=survey on this even though you are adding other objects throughout the US that are also source survey so I am starting to doubt that, I would really like a more in depth explanation as to how you are finding all these objects throughout the US.

Your change set comment could also be better, for more info on that see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments .

Happy mapping,
Udar
ADAC Touristische InfoSysteme (2025-07-29 14:56:00+00:00): You deleted the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2702400314 . 
However, there's a problem with Delhi, as it has a dual role as a state and a city.
There's only one relation for Delhi, but (until the change) two nodes, one with place=state and one with place=city. You wanted to clean that up, right?

With the change, Delhi no longer appears as a city on the map on openstreetmap.org (and in the search it is only found as a state too). Do you have a solution?

Perhaps a simple fix would be to change place=state to place=city in the remaining node. In OSM, the place=state node isn't used for rendering anyway, but rather the center of the relation.
See Berlin for example: only has one place=city node and none with place=state.
Or revert changes?
user_21183540 (2025-07-30 01:32:19+00:00): I don't think changing the boundary to place=city would be correct, since Delhi still have some villages in it. Nor do I think it would be a good idea to have 2 Delhis, since people don't make much of a distinction between the two. (Delhi city encompasses almost all of the area of Delhi state, even villagers call they are in Delhi city.) Are you suggesting changing just the label to place=city? Would it cause any problem with Delhi relation which should contain place=state?

(BTW, I think one can see the word "Delhi" on the map if they zoom out, like other Indian states like "Bihar." It might be hidden because it is very close to "New Delhi", the capital of India.
ADAC Touristische InfoSysteme (2025-07-30 16:13:09+00:00): yes, you should definitely not change the relation, but rather the existing node to place=city.
Otherwise, without the change, there would be two problems: the OSM search would only find the state but not the city, and the map would display New Delhi but not the city of Delhi (and state names would only be displayed inconspicuously).
user_21183540 (2025-07-31 01:04:36+00:00): Done
maxerickson (2026-04-22 22:57:52+00:00): I play disc golf here and had been keeping an eye out for quite some time after seeing your note. Yesterday we finally happened upon the cemetery due to flooding on a low section of the course. I moved it to the correct location over on the east side of the park.
NeisBot (2025-07-19 05:48:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-20 05:37:29+00:00): Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169146061
Firefishy (2025-07-21 14:40:01+00:00): Best not to delete the building if it still exists, just delete the incorrect name detail etc.
❤️‍🔥 (2025-07-19 09:44:17+00:00): thanks for bring this up, based on https://data.linz.govt.nz/layer/51316 and https://gazetteer.linz.govt.nz/place/14912 the node further offshore is Wellington Rock, so I've removed the name from the other area
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-19 06:30:41+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13011200546
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017523869

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2025-07-20 14:05:28+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B%28node%5B%22Berg%22%5D%3Bway%5B%22Berg%22%5D%3B%3E%3Brel%5B%22Berg%22%5D%3B%29%3Bout%20meta%3B
What is the mean of the tags
Berg = 103
Humes = &
Stonelined = Cleartone
Trumpet = Mute
Is this a copy & paste error?
AndrewSnow (2025-07-21 00:55:29+00:00): Seems to have been a breakdown of the copy buffer - haven't seen that before.  Fixed now.
pfhllnts (2025-07-19 06:42:56+00:00): Wrong commit message: this adds switch info east of Cervignano
Comino (2025-07-19 12:50:38+00:00): Beste Gerrit,

Ik zie dat je zojuist je bedrijf hebt toegevoegd op OpenStreetMap (OSM). Los van het feit dat je een verouderde tag gebruikt, mogen bedrijven of diensten zonder een fysiek adres, of met een adres dat niet duidelijk herkenbaar is als winkel of kantoor (bijvoorbeeld als het zich in een woonwijk bevindt), niet vermeld worden op OpenStreetMap (OSM).

Als je wel een fysieke winkel of kantoor hebt, zou ik het op prijs stellen als je een foto van de buitenkant als bewijs zou kunnen leveren (een foto van de straat waar je winkel of kantoor duidelijk zichtbaar is met de naam/logo van het bedrijf). 

Kun je dat niet, dan verzoek ik je de vermelding op OSM te verwijderen.

Bedankt voor je begrip. 

Met vriendelijke groet,

Edwin
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
Wolderik (2025-07-21 21:33:45+00:00): Welke bron is gebruikt voor verplaatsing van de Geldmaat (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12175377793) ?  De vorige positie was de echte locatie binnen in de Albert Heijn supermarkt.
emvee (2025-07-21 21:55:03+00:00): Ik heb geen bron voor de locatie van de Geldautomaat in de winkel maar zet ze meestal in de buurt van de ingang.

Inmiddels de node weer terug gezet op de plaats waar hij stond, https://osmcha.org/changesets/169265462

Ook de ingang ingetekend en de supermarkt node meer naar het midden verplaatst. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=169265604
Leo Slager (2025-07-20 16:00:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
nevw (2025-07-19 21:53:13+00:00): Hi, the Jamie Larcombe Centre is an invalid multipolygon contruct
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=138.63006&lat=-34.94366&zoom=19
There are examples here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
ManuelB701 (2025-07-19 08:44:49+00:00): Übrigens noch Hesse DOP20 als eine weitere Quelle, zur Anpassung der die Gebäudeformen, um die Verzerrungen der Mainzer Luftbilder zu vermindern.
Dodko (2025-07-31 06:58:26+00:00): Ak nemalú inú web stránku mali ste ponechať vyplnené website tak ako bolo.
Nie každá aplikácia podporuje tag contact:instagram takže ste ich "skryli".
Martin Ortuta (2025-08-28 07:23:02+00:00): Vďaka za upozornenie. Dal som ich ig naspäť aj do website. Opravím aj iné prevádzky, ktoré som takto upravoval.
zstadler (2025-07-19 12:06:16+00:00): היי Flayer,

האם הבסיס פונה? למשל, עבור השכונה שנראה שאמורה לקום במקומו?
Flayer (2025-07-19 12:08:34+00:00): היי, אכן הבסיס פונה.
zstadler (2025-07-19 12:10:36+00:00): תודה!
Flayer (2025-07-19 12:12:41+00:00): אפילו תוכל לראות את זה, אם תעבור לשכבת רקע של Esri, במקום ברירית מחדל. :)
zstadler (2025-07-19 12:21:19+00:00): סימן שזה היה מזמן :-)
NeisBot (2025-07-19 08:16:29+00:00): Hi Arcer79, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Modified building and network tags to reflect historic status and bus operator information, removing fixme flags and adjusting area designations."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
user_5359 (2025-07-20 14:58:19+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1415841199, http://www.osm.org/way/1415841597. What is the mean of the tags
Lankroll = Normal
Ordningsnummer = 2567
Vard = Ja
?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-07-24 11:30:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 169393106 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some (perhaps unintential) changes by a new user that involved quite a lot of deletions in East Yorkshire.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18473
Filip009 (2025-07-22 14:00:55+00:00): Zdravím, prosím opravte si gramatiku.
notmyproblem1 (2025-07-19 16:47:35+00:00): Hi dude! Thanks for modifying my relation, Where did you pick the name=? Let me know

thanks :)
Map47 (2025-07-19 19:53:01+00:00): Prego...ho cercato qui:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1067232205211724&focus=photo&lat=44.210521&lng=9.9683816&z=17&x=0.5077071511700011&y=0.44512693006724274&zoom=0
notmyproblem1 (2025-07-24 15:31:28+00:00): aaaah si, grazie, e scusami
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-29 20:38:30+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13011317413/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this edit
What kind of shop is here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting?
Alessandro Ambrosino (2025-07-19 10:39:07+00:00): For proof of bilingism see coordinates: 45.923810, 13.613024


Alessandro Ambrosino (2025-07-19 10:42:31+00:00): For Ialmicco see coordinates: 45.908005, 13.346611


Alessandro Ambrosino (2025-07-19 10:43:52+00:00): For Cervignano see coordinates: 45.809884, 13.342766


Alessandro Ambrosino (2025-07-19 10:53:57+00:00): For Palmanova and Visco see: 45.899192, 13.309563


impiaaa (2025-07-20 01:12:37+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding the driveway! Somehow in this change you dragged Lane 15 East to an impossible location. Also, it looks like the address already existed on the building. I've fixed both of those issues in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169142801
yrtimiD (2025-07-22 01:06:46+00:00): Welcome and thank you for your contribution!

I noticed that you change name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11061951863 from "Good Pharm" to "GOOD PHARM". While I understand that you for sure wanted to follow official site naming style, but I believe in this specific case we should keep the "Good Pharm" version as it better follows English grammar rules. I also consulted with other contributors and got this nice manual from Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Trademarks#General_rules which also recommends to not use upper case.
so, if you agree - please revert the change, and if not - you are welcome to join our discussion in community telegram chat.
yrtimiD (2025-07-22 01:22:48+00:00): BTW, looks like you accidentally deleted one of corners of this school: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500396871
I'll fix it, but please be more careful and review changes before saving.
yrtimiD (2025-07-22 01:24:10+00:00): also here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2888988091
if you wanted to say that this item is on -1 level, the more correct tag is level=-1 (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level) instead of building:floor=-1.
yrtimiD (2025-07-22 01:28:57+00:00): and the last one: if it's possible, please, try to edit existing items instead of deleting them and creating a new one. This is important for preserving history and respects other's work (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history)

(you deleted parking and recreated a new one at the same place with different shape)

happy mapping!
DodoGTA (2025-07-19 12:18:52+00:00): Netoli posūkio į 92192419 kelią mačiau kelio ženklą kur buvo parašyta „Respublikos g.“ su dešine rodykle (tai tas kelias greičiausiai turėtų turėti „Respublikos g.“ pavadinimą)
Aurimas Fišeras (2025-07-21 11:33:49+00:00): OSM gatves žymime taip, kaip jos yra oficialiai (https://www.regia.lt/map/regia2?x=338104.93&y=6141682&scale=25000&identify=true), o ne kaip, pvz., Google, kur gatvės pavadinimas priskirtas gatvei ir dar krūvai kelių aplinkui.
addr: (2025-07-19 09:44:47+00:00): оуч)
❤️‍🔥 (2025-07-20 03:10:27+00:00): hey, is https://osm.org/node/13011393177 intentionally different from https://osm.org/node/9012940607 which seems to refer to the same wikipedia article? i'm not a local, just wanted to double check. seems like it would be better to fix the name on https://osm.org/node/9012940607 instead
EleGlobe (2025-07-22 06:54:58+00:00): https://osm.org/node/13011393177 (Peacocke) will be the new main marker for the surrounding new suburbs populations including North Peacocke & Amberfield to house the Wiki Tags which I'm going to shift now. Basically North Peacocke's population is currently the same as Peacocke's until the surrounding developments are going to be completed. Then sometime then we'll find out more about North Peacocke's population then. Peacocke will be like similar to how Rototuna is now today.
aceman444 (2025-07-20 20:36:18+00:00): Zdravim, dakujem za pokus.

Ale podla coho su podla Vas teraz tie ostrovceky presnejsie ako som ich mal ja?
Na Ortofoto to nie je (kedze su to nove upravy), takze akekolvek umiestnenie je len odhad.

Na https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1463990728 urcite semafor nie je.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/612938526 nebolo treba vymazavat. Budovu na Ortofoto stale vidiet, tak je dobre ju mat v OSM ako "removed:" by ju niekto znovu nezakreslil.

A to potiahnutie cyklocesty za priechod pre chodcov tiez nemusi byt spravne. Predosly stav kreslil vacsi cykloodbornik.

A ake "streetlevel imagery" pouzivate?
aceman444 (2025-07-20 22:11:18+00:00): Bod https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1449511452 nie je zastavkou /nastupistom (teda nebol kym ste ho nim nespravne neurobili), takze tie zmeny na nom su nezmyselne.
Taya_S (2025-07-23 12:40:12+00:00): Hello BholeKiBhasam,

The waterways you added in this area all seem to be intermittent if I look at the aerial imagery. Why did you add `intermittent=no` here? 

I was also wondering why all the ways you're adding are so small? This generally is more prone to errors as it requires tagging a lot more ways. It also makes looking through changesets more difficult, as everything is spread across many tiny changesets. You might want to consider making your changesets a bit bigger.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder
Allison P (2025-07-20 14:08:53+00:00): Please don't connect landuse to sidewalks, service roads, or similar features. It is topologically incorrect and makes the data harder to maintain.

I would also comment on the tagging of the buildings but it seems you've fixed that already.
GeekBotique (2025-07-20 21:10:40+00:00): Hello there.
Would you please describe the violation in more detail or provide a better example so I can avoid this problem in the future. This is my first time using OSM and I want to understand to provide better content. 
I try to follow examples of other map makers in the areas I choose to work on.
Thank you
Allison P (2025-07-20 22:05:15+00:00): In this changeset, you modified the way representing Palisades Apartments to connect directly to the adjacent sidewalk. This means that if you add or remove nodes from the sidewalk, it changes the apartments too, and vice versa.

Before this edit, the way representing the apartment complex had 8 nodes, and now it has 17. If a user downloads the new version of the data it will be almost twice the size.

What I mean by topologically incorrect is that the sidewalk way is supposed to represent the middle of the concrete area, and the apartment complex goes to the edge of the concrete. If they touch, it implies that half of the sidewalk is part of the complex.

Also, if a crosswalk were built, and you added a node to the sidewalk to accommodate it, then you would end up adding it to the apartment complex as well.

If you are not already, you should disable most of the map features while editing, using the Map Data tab.  Only edit the ones you want to touch. It is common for new mappers to accidentally touch features they did not want to edit, and it can be overwhelming and slow down the browser if a place is mapped in detail.
GeekBotique (2025-07-20 22:21:55+00:00): Aha! Thank you for the explanation. Have you corrected the mistake already?

By nodes. Do you mean points placed on building shapes? It would explain why the areas are simplified and why they don't line up with the actual shape of the buildings as shown in the satellite images. 

Besides the apartments, I have been messing around with rural areas and I assumed Ai was used to assign simple shapes or bounding boxes to represent structures. It bothered me that they didn't line up but it also explains why the program slowed down as I added more detail.

If I understand what a node is, this is why a building with a complex shape is represented by a box with 4 corners.....or nodes??

The design is intentional?
Allison P (2025-07-20 22:36:34+00:00): Yes, I fixed the complex.

iD slows down after a few hundred edits in one session because it keeps track of the edit history for undo and redo. Slowdown due to loading in a lot of detail in one area is a separate issue.

The nodes are, as you say, like corners on the buildings. The buildings in and around Melba you were looking at were detected using computer vision (a kind of AI). I added them a few years back because they were better than nothing. I have improved many of them, but I haven't done much mapping in Melba so some of them are pretty poor. If I were mapping them today, I would have been much more selective with which ones were acceptable.