piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
iandees (2026-04-10 14:30:59+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2829155284 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181150841, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
WupperWolf (2026-04-10 09:25:57+00:00): Gerne noch den Kommentar note:de "Generalsanierung bis Juni 2026" entfernen
ghostrider44 (2026-05-25 08:07:21+00:00): Hallo SOUGrOjj2Ppa4zMrmfv,
schau dir mal folgende Seite an:
https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BW/DE-BW-VVS-Analysis.html#bus_578 
Laut Chronik hast du am 10.04.2026 die Relation
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20247138#map=18/48.940302/8.967467 
bearbeitet. Kannst du das überprüfen?
Gruß ghostrider44
SOUGrOjj2Ppa4zMrmfv (2026-05-25 08:28:16+00:00): Bei meiner Änderung habe ich nur die Reihenfolge von zwei Wegen getauscht um den PTNA Fehler "PTv2 Route: besteht aus x Segmenten, [...]" zu beheben.
Der Weg wurde in der vorhergehenden Änderung (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20247138/history/2) an der falscher Stelle eingefügt.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-26 02:17:01+00:00): Removed SEO spam POI with no meaningful tags, reverted name change of entire building to one POI within, and fixed bad address tagging in changset 183183242

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183183242
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-04-10 09:32:38+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 178002710, 178085938, 178086704, 178087640, 178088483, 178089175, 178305638, 178305840, 178306002, 178442940, 178444440, 178617177, 178617847, 178619443, 178623445, 178624673, 178666017, 178666885, 178669226, 178669426, 178670696, 178671575, 178672396, 178714954, 178716409, 178719498, 178759952, 178762343, 179075006, 179075021, 179075083, 179076196, 179077562, 179078209, 179078923, 179384681, 179386263, 179387809.
Dawid2849 (2026-04-10 10:21:56+00:00): Myślałem, że skasowałem ten kiosk, dzięki!
tuketuke (2026-07-19 17:33:14+00:00): Hei, oletkohan nyt ihan varmasti käynyt paikan päällä tuolla Fågelberginojan ympäristössä kulkevalla polulla? Erityisesti sen Ahoniityntien puoleisella osalla, jonka jatkoit karttaan. Tiedän, että se on maastokartassa mutta eihän se ole mikään tae siitä, että se on olemassa ja kuljettavissa. Itse en ainakaan päässyt kasvillisuuden takia sieltä järkevästi läpi ja siksi en merkinnyt polkua kokonaan kuten maastokartassa. Vastaustasi odottaen
mueschel (2026-04-18 13:42:56+00:00): Hi,
the deposit / return tags you used here are not used in any other place. The proper tagging is described in the wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:vending%3Dbottle_return

Could you check and fix these?
thomasafonsito12 (2026-04-25 16:14:09+00:00): Hello. The time I created these points were before there were community guidelines. I did it by myself, so I did not know what were the apropriate tags. But I have fixed all of ones I miscreated.
Jordi MF (2026-04-10 20:22:43+00:00): En este debate ya se te explicó que no es correcto abreviar las denominaciones de los centros educativos: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/el-uso-de-las-siglas-ies-ceip-y-otras-delante-de-los-nombre-propios-de-los-centros-educativos/104200

La denominación debería de ser "Centro Rural Agrupado Olea - Escuela de La Ginebrosa". "Olea" viene del nombre de la planta, no son siglas que deban de escribirse en mayúsculas.
Rawmance (2026-04-21 17:15:02+00:00): Taas aika älyttömiä muutoksia. "Forsbackantie" ei ole mikään päällystetty tie vaan vanha maatalous peltotie joka on osin niin mudassa että siitä ei millään henkilöautolla ajeta. Jos ei ole mitään hajua mitä paikan päällä on niin ehkä niitä ei kannata muutella sattumanvaraisesti.
iandees (2026-04-10 14:31:04+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1257934657 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181150849, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
mavl (2026-04-11 11:50:32+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет здание:  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1498159837  
  
Похоже, что это здание обрисовано по спутниковому снимку Bing, но сам контур здания не сдвинут к его основанию (фундаменту).  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Здания  
  
Если контур этого здания сдвинуть к его основанию, то не нужно будет делать выступ на линии территории под это здание.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/140270678
mavl (2026-04-11 11:51:34+00:00): Прошу прощения, не по Bing, по Esri.
0xb7767000 (2026-04-13 09:55:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1418102693/history

Moin, du hast bei der Telefonnummer der Galerie etwas gefettfingert. Die Nummer endet aktuell auf 5o5, also Zahl 5 - Buchstabe o - Zahl 5.
Buntbart (2026-04-13 15:48:10+00:00): hupsi, ist korrigiert, danke!
HueMan1 (2026-04-11 01:22:15+00:00): Trece Martires City Hall Rotunda? Again, a made-up name.
iandees (2026-04-10 14:31:09+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/267540337 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181150856, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Adava Pays d'Aix (2026-04-10 21:33:05+00:00): Bonjour,
Quelques erreurs dans les oneway bicycle sur Schweitzer et Corbusier. C'est bien des pistes unidirectionnelles.
enzo_immergis (2026-04-11 08:32:20+00:00): Bonjour Adava Pays d'Aix,
Est-il possible de vous créer un compte personnel ? Afin que je puisse identifier à qui je parle plus facilement ^^ 

La piste cyclable sur trottoir de Schweitzer n'est pas clairement identifiée comme unidirectionnelle ou bidirectionnelle (aucun picto ni panneau) :/
Je l'ai remise en unidirectionnelle en remettant deux chemins pour clairement identifié le cheminement vélo et celui piéton.

Pour le Corbusier auriez-vous des photos récentes ? Je ne vois pas de piste cyclable (peut-être un aménagement mixte mais rien de sur).
https://api.panoramax.xyz/?focus=pic&map=18/43.523568/5.431033&pic=5b38309c-b73f-42c9-97b0-547f0e0d85af&seq=444af957-3f2e-4cef-8ebb-d65c35c42d66&speed=250&theme=default&users=default&xyz=56.77/-15.47/30

Attention également avec les SAS vélo : le feu tricolore doit être placé après, pas avant.

Au plaisir d'échanger,
Enzo
Eric Royer (2026-04-13 18:35:48+00:00): Hi geocrest , can you explain me why did you downgrade MD 112 to tertiary road, normally MD is for secondary road?
Geocrest (2026-06-29 18:22:02+00:00): Hi Eric Royer, I misinterpreted the situation after I saw the segment had connectivity to tertiary roads. Thank you for reaching out and clarifying the classification of MD references. I have made the corrections according to your guidance.
eggie (2026-04-10 11:15:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback name-egen 1

    [amenity=place_of_worship en building=church]
    Ludgeruskerk (Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken)  Zal niet de naam van de kerk zijn. Wellicht wat tussen haakjes staat is de operator=.....


MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
In Herdenking oorlogsslachtoffers zit een spelfout en het is de vraag of de naam niet beter onder description kan.
Is het de naam van het gedenkteken?
eggie (2026-04-10 11:25:49+00:00): Voorbeeld voor sluiting openingstijden
closed; 2020 Jan 01 - 2025 May 15 Mo-Su,PH 08:00-20:00

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
eggie (2026-04-10 11:27:23+00:00): Naam als bovenstaand aangepast. Spelfout aangepast.
NeisBot (2026-04-10 11:00:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13720478197 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dog kennel"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisBot (2026-04-10 11:15:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13720425150 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Yoga studio"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Yogastudio"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
KennyDap (2026-04-10 13:56:07+00:00): If you want to map and be useful, please do it carefully. Everything you've done has had to be deleted.
aTarom (2026-04-10 12:21:25+00:00): Hola, los tags
"label"
y
"secondary_use"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28491439/history
no parecen encajar en ningún esquema actual, sabes el uso actual de la cantera?
creo que sería mejor el prefijo "was:..." si la cantera ya no está en uso.
Si quieres podemos comentarlo con los compañeros en el grupo de Telegram
https://t.me/OSMes
Saludos
eggie (2026-04-10 11:50:05+00:00): Ahh.. oke..allebij bezig..
Nog een dingetje..We gebruiken note=... als aanwijzing voor een medemapper en description=... voor een eindgebruiker.
eggie (2026-04-10 11:54:10+00:00): Typo allebei.... eenmaal op de knop gedrukt ben je al te laat..
Veel plezier met mappen aan het dorp.
Taya_S (2026-04-10 12:06:19+00:00): Are you sure these names are correct? I don't recall "ø" being part of the english alphabet, so it is weird to add a `name:en` with such a character.
JeroenHoek (2026-04-10 12:31:50+00:00): The English language is perfectly capable of handling diacritics for exonyms though:

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Sams%C3%B8

In use in a British newspaper:

https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2017/feb/24/energy-positive-how-denmarks-sams-island-switched-to-zero-carbon
JeroenHoek (2026-04-10 12:33:12+00:00): (Although I feel obliged to point out that Wikipedia is not a good source for OpenStreetMap when it comes to names.)
Pink Duck (2026-04-13 14:25:31+00:00): Noticed that Royal Mail only has postal city for these, but county council addressing includes Thorpe St. Andrew as suburb district.
acubens71 (2026-04-10 13:48:09+00:00): Bonjour,

Vous éditez en boucle les mêmes objets toutes les heures, un problème de votre côté ?
Thomas2504 (2026-04-10 14:33:10+00:00): I have an issue with comaps crashing related to the editing dialog. Maybe it is stuck an keeps resending edits. These repeated edits arent send by me. I have alteady sent a bug report.
Sorry for the spam.
AntMadeira (2026-04-12 12:10:22+00:00): Hello, user_10901495.

I noticed you altered six cities in Algarve to town.
Can you explain why and what did you based that change on?

Regards,
António
user_10901495 (2026-04-12 13:00:45+00:00): Hi, it's simply because a lot of places tagged as city in Portugal would not be considered cities in any other place.
From a simple query on the number of place=city in Portugal the result is 158. In Italy, which is double the size of Portugal, the number of place=city is 95.
France: 62
Spain: 88
Germany: 84
Clearly the concept of city is inflated in Portugal, and a place like Vila Real de Santo António (pop. 11.360) would be considered a town anywhere else, since there are about 750 places in Italy with more than 15.000 inhabitants and only 95 places tagged as city.
This change is not intended to be limited to Algarve but to the whole of Portugal in which the distinction between town and city is not clear.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Town
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City

Best regards,
Martino
AntMadeira (2026-04-12 13:17:50+00:00): Hello, Martino.
Thank you for your quick reply.

First things irst, you should have contacted the Portuguese community or the past editors to discuss these changes. It's would have been the proper way to do it, before changing the work of others.

The cities and towns in Portugal are dictated by national law, which means they're verifiable based on concrete data, and not on ambiguous/non verifiable data.
You can check this on the wiki and the discussion pages linked there:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dcity#The_case_of_Portugal

If you have something important to add to discussion, you're more than welcomed to participate and better the map, but all changes made without consulting the community will be reverted.

Regards,
António
user_10901495 (2026-04-12 13:25:18+00:00): No problem, I had no idea this was a ongoing issue.
I will change the place type back.

Best regards,
Martino
AntMadeira (2026-04-12 14:36:27+00:00): Thank you for your understanding.

Regards,
António
DressyPear4 (2026-07-16 05:33:01+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/185824348
NeisBot (2026-04-10 11:57:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1309912479 v2 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/824063651 v4
https://osm.org/node/1439718206 v2
https://osm.org/node/1439718328 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181142287
Alexmol (2026-04-12 12:32:53+00:00): Olá.

Porque é que mudou Silves de city para town ?

Why did you change Silves from city to town ?
user_10901495 (2026-04-12 13:02:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181141956
TrickyFoxy (2026-05-22 21:11:21+00:00): 👋 К сожалению Яндекс.Карты для правок использовать нельзя
literan (2026-04-11 09:03:14+00:00): непонятно, зачем вы это сделали - надвинули дом на мусорки

откачу
bigbug21 (2026-06-07 19:23:12+00:00): Hallo DrmedWurst24513,

in [1] findet sich ein Hinweis zu einer abweichenden Streckennummer. Kannst du damit etwas anfangen bzw. das aufklären? (Ich kopple das auch gerne in das Forum zurück.)

[1] https://www.drehscheibe-online.de/foren/read.php?002,11464519,11465146#msg-11465146
NeisAgent (2026-04-10 16:33:35+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
UUChampions (2026-04-16 08:53:09+00:00): I have now confirmed the changes through Bing imagery as well as local knowledge.
NeisAgent (2026-04-10 16:33:37+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
simonnorm (2026-04-11 08:54:00+00:00): The data was collected from local knowledge (and physical presence) and Bing imagery,
simonnorm (2026-04-11 08:59:52+00:00): Correction: The data for roads, surface and benches was collected from local knowledge (as well as physical presence) and Bing imagery for determining width.
NeisAgent (2026-04-10 16:33:39+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
NeisBot (2026-04-10 12:24:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12559993787 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Engineer office"
---
Ad esempio, una versione più neutra e fattuale del tuo testo potrebbe essere: "Ufficio dell'ingegnere"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisBot (2026-04-10 13:26:45+00:00): 🌍 Bienvenue sur OSM, cpcnumdigne.
Merci de contribuer !

Pour faciliter la collaboration et aider les autres à comprendre tes modifications, il est préférable d'ajouter une courte description des changements que tu as apportés. Des commentaires clairs aident la communauté à suivre ton travail et à fournir des retours plus précis. Tu peux trouver des conseils pour écrire de bons commentaires ici[1].

✅ Voici un exemple de commentaire basé sur tes modifications de carte : "Ajout de la date d'enquête, de l'accès, de la bouteille, du fauteuil roulant et des détails sur les frais"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, cpcnumdigne.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added survey date, access, bottle, wheelchair, and fee details"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
cpcnumdigne (2026-04-10 15:28:09+00:00): Bonjour,

Je suis conseiller pédagogique numérique 1er degré et cet après-midi j'ai fait travailler une classe de CM2 sur la mise à jour de cette zone.

Les élèves ont utilisé, sous mon contrôle et ma validation, mon compte (dont je change le mot de passe avant et après).

Nous avons utilisé l'application OsmGo et effectivement le commentaire n'a pas été renseigné, ce n'est pas possible à ce niveau et dans ce contexte de poster un commentaire.

De plus cela voudrait dire qu'il faut faire un changeset par modification, ce qui extrêmement compliqué dans ce cadre qui s'apparente à une carto-partie en milieu scolaire.
Rainero (2026-04-19 09:38:45+00:00): Hallo wies1,  
hast du bitte mal einen Link zu deiner Quelle Mapbox? Wie sehen denn die Nutzungsbedingungen von Mapbox aus? 

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
wies1 (2026-04-19 14:40:43+00:00): Hallo Rainer,

wie du diesem CS entnehmen kannst, habe ich diesen CS mit JOSM bearbeitet und hierbei Adressdaten vervollständigt. Mit Vervollständigen meine ich die Ergänzung von postcode, city, country. Diese Informationen ergeben sich aus OSM bereits selbst.
Die source Angabe Mapbox bezieht sich nicht auf das Vervollständigen selbst - dafür haette es keiner Quelle bedurft, nein, Mapbox habe ich angegeben, da ich in diesem CS , wenn auch nicht viel, ein Gebäude erstellt habe und drei weitere Gebäude modifiziert habe. Mapbox findest du unter "Hintergrund" in JOSM, genau gemeint ist das Mapbox Satelitenbild. Ich dachte mit der Angabe von Mapbox unter JOSM wäre klar, dass hierbei das Mapbox Satelitenbild gemeint ist.

Ich werde es zukuenftig klarer verfassen oder statt Mapbox dann eben Esri oder Bing als Hintergrund nehmen. Denn einen Hintergrund nehme ich schon, auch wenn es um das Vervollständigen von Adressdaten geht, denn nur so kann ich sehen, ob womöglich das ein oder andere Gebäude in OSM noch fehlt und dieses dann ggf. nachtragen oder anpassen.

Einen Link zu etwaigen Nutzungsbedingungen kenne ich nicht. Meines Wissens nach dürfen wir jedoch alle Hintergründe nehmen, welche in JOSM eingepflegt sind.

Gruss

wies1
Rainero (2026-04-19 16:30:41+00:00): Ah ok. Die Kombination von comment="Adressdaten vervollständigt" mit source=Mapbox führte zu meiner Annahme, die Adressen stammten aus einem Adressenlayer von Mapbox. 
Das Mapbox Luftbild ist natürlich ok.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
enzo_immergis (2026-05-27 21:11:19+00:00): Bonjour Pierre,
Même retour que sur le changeset suivant : changeset/181102794#map=15/43.12478/6.01819&layers=C

Est-il possible de faire machine arrière et de repasser les chemins en 'highway=path' ?
Merci

https://facilmap.org/#17/43.13017/6.07616/Mpnk/%22changeset%20181144853%22
NeisBot (2026-04-10 12:33:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13720675017 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dentist office"

#MapWithoutSpam
eggie (2026-04-10 13:30:08+00:00): Hi   dzm,

This is not correct.. Itl's an underground parking under construction.
All buildings are import from the Dutch registry. You delete the buildingtag?
I will revert this changeset.

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2026-04-10 13:30:29+00:00): reverted by changeset #181148040
eggie (2026-04-10 13:32:25+00:00): I added a separate area with landuse = construction.
dzmnkln (2026-04-10 13:40:57+00:00): Hello! You are right, I didn't check info from Dutch registry. I'm sorry. With added landuse = construction site looks really great. Appreciate your work. Thanks for your feedback.
9_tab (2026-04-11 08:08:37+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour ces mises à jour — elles améliorent la couverture des données. Peux-tu expliquer les modifications que tu as faites sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3670751278/history ? Comme le tag "addr:housenumber" désigne principalement l'entrée (ou la façade donnant sur une rue), je ne comprends pas l'utilité des suppressions. Si tu as une raison, peux-tu la préciser ? Sinon, je propose de restaurer les valeurs supprimées. Merci d'avance pour ton retour