piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ilias_ (2026-03-18 19:49:17+00:00): Maybe continue with your wiki copy paste? The two examples on that exact same wiki page are exactly the same as this example:

"There is a bridge in Glasgow known as the Squinty Bridge, but its official name is the Clyde Arc. I have never heard anyone calling it that, so the bridge is tagged loc_name=Squinty Bridge name=Clyde Arc.
In Reading there's Union Street, but it's been known for decades as Smelly Alley on account of the fishmongers that lined it. The loc_name=* is ideal."

Both use the official name in "name" and the local name in "loc_name".
سامي ايت علي ولحسن (2026-03-19 12:49:48+00:00): Please read the definition more closely, emphasis on this part: "only where this is deemed to be too much of a slang name or otherwise unofficial-sounding. Ordinarily though, the name which local people use is the name we set in the name=*"
I did read the examples, and those make sense, "Squinty" or "Smelly Alley" should definitely not be featured as names. "Trees Avenue" though is pretty alright. 
Cheers !
ilias_ (2026-03-22 00:55:21+00:00): You're selectively reading the wiki. The full quote you keep citing literally says loc_name is for when the local name is "deemed to be too much of a slang name or otherwise unofficial-sounding." "Chari3 Chjar" is a colloquial nickname, it's not on any sign, any administrative record, or any official document. It's what people say when giving directions, not a street name.

The Squinty Bridge example you tried to dismiss is exactly this case. Maybe nobody calls it Driss Harti in practice, same as nobody calls Squinty Bridge "Clyde Arc", which is literally the point of that example.

And "Trees Avenue is pretty alright" is not a tagging standard. That's just vibes.
سامي ايت علي ولحسن (2026-03-24 14:12:05+00:00): There seems to be a language barrier here. The part you cited doesn't mean the name needs to be on a sign, administrative record, or official document. 
You're also missing the point of the examples which illustrate names that are too slang for the "name" tag.
eggie (2026-03-16 12:31:34+00:00): Hoi,

Wanneer je changesetgebied opeens zo groot is dan is er wat bijzo ders aan de hand. Je hebt een weg vastgemaakt aan de bebouwde kom van Garyp.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=179949108

eggie
eggie (2026-03-16 12:35:00+00:00): De weg heb ik weer losgemaakt van de landuse residential.
Plakken kun je voorkomen door de linker alt toets te gebruiken. 
Relaties kun je alleen maar goed verwijderen met editor josm.
Een weg eerst verwijderen maakt ook de relatie stuk.
Kijk eens naar josm. Daar zul je toch niet aan ontkomen als je doorzet als mapper.
rene78 (2026-03-17 05:44:45+00:00): Hi mcliquid,

wenn es 4 Ladepunkte mit je 22kW gibt müsste "charging_station:output" dann nicht 88kW betragen?
mcliquid (2026-03-17 07:34:19+00:00): Hi, es sind zwei Säulen mit je 2 Ladebuchsen je 22 kW. D.h. 4 Buchsen in Summe je 22 kW. Pro Ladesäule aber nur 44 kW in total.
Ich hab die beiden Säulen aufgeteilt, dann sollte es hoffentlich klarer werden :)
rene78 (2026-03-17 10:57:55+00:00): 👍
stasiu512 (2026-03-16 13:12:07+00:00): Cześć, jesteś pewny że pas rowerowy dociera aż w okolice posesji 26? Jest to pas dwukierunkowy? Jakie właściwie jest tam oznakowanie pionowe?
aaronq227 (2026-03-24 14:36:51+00:00): Hi Jay May,
I noticed you changed some sections of highway from motorway to trunk. Based on the OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Malaysian_Roads_Tagging#Expressway), expressways in Malaysia are typically tagged as motorway, especially when they are tolled (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway#Toll_gates), and this road is named “Second Link Expressway”. Would you please consider changing this area back to highway=motorway?

Thank you for your time and I look forward to hearing from you!
rodolfovargas (2026-03-18 12:46:01+00:00): Hola. Un elemento no pude tener nombre "casa". Se refiere al nombre propio del elemento o negocio.
habi (2026-03-18 09:22:09+00:00): I've completed the relation in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180047812 by adding the two tunnel segments that were missing.
9_tab (2026-03-18 13:24:56+00:00): I had mentioned it in the forum. Interestingly, the improvement is there even w/o
streckenkundler (2026-03-16 17:54:37+00:00): Hei,

Hach Kreisverkehre... Bitte Kreisverkehre ausschließlich und stets nur splitten, wenn sich innerhalb des Kreisels die Anzahl der Fahrspuren ändert in allen anderen Fällen ist eine Aufsplittung des Kreisels total unnötig. Es ist bei Kreisverkehren auch unnötig, Abbiegerelationen wie z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20336475 zu setzen. Da ergibt sich von selbst, daß man nur rechts weiter darf dadurch, daß der Kreisel nur entgegen gesetzt des Uhrzeigersinns befahren werden darf.
Als Kollateralschaden tauchen bei gesplitteten Kreisverkehren sonst Probleme bei anderen Routenrelationen auf: z.B. https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/route/12284039

Auch bei Busrouten werden Kreisel gerne mal gesplittet, auch hier ist es unnötig...

Ich werde das nachher reparieren. Danke fürs Verständnis.

Sven
BrummsLee (2026-03-16 18:35:59+00:00): Hallo Sven!
Ich weiß das mit dem Aufsplitten von Kreisverkehren und bin auch kein Freund davon. Hier muß ich zu meiner Verteidigung sagen, daß dies kein echter Kreisverkehr ist. (meiner Meinung nach)
Er ist nicht als solcher beschildert. Es gibt nur die Richtungspfeile. Das Aufsplitten passierte dann automatisch, mit der Ergänzung der Abbiegebeschränkungen.
Das habe ich dann aber erst gesehen, als ich schon einige Bearbeitungen weiter war.
Hatte schon überlegt, es zurück zu nehmen. Erschien mir dann aber auf Grund, daß es halt kein "richtiger" Kreisverkehr ist, doch korrekt. Es war nicht meine Absicht da die Radroute zu zerstören! Entschuldige bitte!
streckenkundler (2026-03-16 20:22:12+00:00): So... wieder am Hauptrechner sitzend...

Eieieieiei... ein Pseudo-Kreisverkehr... Achherrje... Ja, du hast mit deiner Bearbeitung dann natürlich vollkommen Recht... Das hätte ich hier jetzt nicht gedacht...

Weiterer Blick: Mapillary ist da eindeutig, z.B. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3707010896219088
Danke für deine Intervention!
Ich hab nur noch mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179969842 Radrouten angepasst und ein junction=circular+ oneway=yes anstelle des junction=roundabout gesetzt. Der Rest passt so für mich! 

Viele Grüße,

Sven
BrummsLee (2026-03-16 21:32:10+00:00): Ah, danke für deine Rückmeldung! 
Puh, da bin ich jetzt aber froh, daß meine Bearbeitung nicht komplett falsch war. 
Danke für die Ergänzungen!
Einen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction=circular hatte ich gar nicht auf dem Schirm... wieder was dazu gelernt.
Auch noch vergessen, den `roundabout` heraus zu nehmen... 🫣​
Inzwischen bin ich auch etwas schlauer, in Bezug auf die Vorfahrtsregelung an diesem Kreisel. Ist ja grundsätzlich anders, als in einem Echten.
Aber wie oft hat man im realen Leben schon mit solch einem Kreisel zu tun...
Danke, Sven!  👍​
Fraxi (2026-04-14 10:36:40+00:00): Индустриалната зона около https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/221223008 може да се обозначи като такава на "Великови ООД"(можете да видите повече за landuse=industrial и man_made=works в wiki.openstreetmap.org), но самата обслужваща улица не е необходимо да носи такова име. А ако пътят е частен, може да се обозначи с access=private или с други тагове в зависимост от случая.
NeisBot (2026-03-16 12:57:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13652305528 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Artificial turf store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-24 17:33:07+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180366170
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
LordGarySugar (2026-05-20 16:54:04+00:00): Please use 'Q' to square buildings; this will make them more accurate and will look neater.
Supaplex (2026-03-17 05:47:24+00:00): 直接寄私訊吧，在這裡罵人是沒有用的
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179950986
NeisBot (2026-03-16 13:12:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13652276283 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dermatology clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-24 17:33:10+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/180347333
george1201 (2026-04-23 19:01:45+00:00): Heute in den BNN: Black Sheep Club jetzt "im hinteren Bereich des Gebäudes in der Herrenstraße 7".
Bienson (2026-03-17 01:11:18+00:00): Der Name des Weges ist also "Südweg (historischer Wegename)"?
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-17 06:29:34+00:00): Die Wegenamen wurden zur Eröffnung des Zentralfriedhofs 1921 von den Gartenarchitekten festgelegt und sind noch heute auf Feldsteinen erkennbar.
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-17 06:29:56+00:00): ...die Zusätze in Klammern habe ich rausgenommen.
rskedgell (2026-03-16 14:26:27+00:00): If you're adding separate sidewalks to roads, please could you also update the sidewalk=* tag on the way representing the road itself, e.g. to sidewalk:both=separate ? Thanks!
pidugu konda reddy (2026-03-17 11:40:41+00:00): Acknowledged. 
Going forward will take care of those tags now only we got this update going forward will take care. Thank you
Bienson (2026-03-17 01:12:19+00:00): Der Name des Weges ist also "Eichenweg (historischer Wegename)"?
Hetisbakkerijdepinknietdegier (2026-03-16 14:39:30+00:00): Ik heb wat syntaxfouten in de openingstijden opgelost, vooral de ';' miste tussen de verschillende tijden.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179955153
Marek-M (2026-05-26 11:03:18+00:00): Cześć, skąd masz wiedzę o asfaltowej nawierzchni na tym objeździe budowanego wiaduktu? W zeszłym tygodniu ten kawałek był nadal nieutwardzony i zwężony.
Tomek | Yanosik (2026-05-29 05:20:42+00:00): hej, dzięki za informację, poprawiłem
dzidek23 (2026-03-17 14:01:10+00:00): Hey, is some of this estate already occupied?
ItsSimonT (2026-03-24 14:37:00+00:00): Hiya, Yes, there are many people living here already!
B252697 (2026-03-16 13:40:04+00:00): I walked past just a few days ago over the last weekend and saw the footpaths which I noticed was not displayed on OSM
DaveF (2026-03-17 14:01:35+00:00): It's not correct because it's not open
railway=platform require area tag due to a bug in OSM-Carto. Reverting.
LordGarySugar (2026-03-17 04:07:35+00:00): Hi, please take more care when tracing buildings. Some things that you can do to improve:
- don't add 'House' in the name field, this is incorrect. 
- use 'Q' to square buildings. They will look better and be more accurate.
- make sure that connected buildings are actually connected, for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489464192 is a semidetached house, so it should share a wall with the neighbouring house.

If you have any questions or need any help, feel free to ask!
gurglypipe (2026-03-16 20:16:54+00:00): Heya, areas like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489465296 look like meadow, rather than cropland, so should probably be tagged as landuse=meadow meadow=pasture (you can see animals grazing on this area in aerial imagery).

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Gurglypipe/landuse for an overview of the consensus several local mappers have on how to tag different types of farmland in the north west. :)
Bienson (2026-03-17 01:16:49+00:00): Der Name des Weges ist also "Eschenweg (historischer Wegename)"?
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-17 06:33:59+00:00): für den Teilabschnitt, ja.
Bienson (2026-03-17 01:13:16+00:00): Die Namen der Wege sind also "Eschenallee (ursprünglich Pappelallee)", "Lindenweg (historischer Wegename)" und Fliederweg (historischer Wegename)?
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-17 06:30:32+00:00): ja, richtig!
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-17 06:31:45+00:00): steht auch so in der bei amazon erhälzlichen Karte "Hauptfriedhof - Wanderungen - Wege - Wissenswertes "
gurglypipe (2026-03-16 17:19:11+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your additions to Caton. It’s nice to see some of the housing gaps here being filled in.

You’ll have noticed I made some changes after your first edit — thanks for picking up on that and learning from it. Happy to answer any questions if you have any.

One question from me — why did you change the Facebook page of Caton FC (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1322379870) from https://www.facebook.com/profile.php/?id=61556191269660 to sheffieldjourno@gmail.com? As far as I can see, the Facebook page is still active.

Cheers
Xuth666 (2026-03-16 22:17:49+00:00): Hi, thanks! Hopefully I can avoid some of the more beginner mistakes again - I appreciate you showingf the way. 

That edit for Caton FC was in error, which I think must've been due an auto-populated field when I clicked the location! I have changed that back.

Many thanks,
gurglypipe (2026-03-17 19:26:39+00:00): No problem, you’ve got up to speed fast!

I’ve just submitted a few more tweaks to what you’ve done today, but nothing major.

One thing to note is that driveways for houses should be tagged as access=private as they’re not part of the public road network.

Aside from that I mostly tidied up a few bits of geometry and added roof tags (which most people don’t bother with; don’t feel you have to; they’re useful for 3D rendering of the map, or for data collection about housing types).

Thanks for fixing the Caton FC details :)
Bienson (2026-03-17 01:14:15+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179976741 - kein Name
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-17 06:33:04+00:00): wie kann ich es richtig angeben?
Bienson (2026-03-18 03:05:55+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:leaf_type

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:trees

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:taxon

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:start_date

Einige Vorschläge
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-19 08:21:16+00:00): geändert.
rskedgell (2026-03-16 14:26:47+00:00): If you're adding separate sidewalks to roads, please could you also update the sidewalk=* tag on the way representing the road itself, e.g. to sidewalk:both=separate ? Thanks!
Vandana@28 (2026-03-17 11:52:38+00:00): acknowledge. going forward will take care
RushMM (2026-03-16 18:42:02+00:00): Why are you adding golf greens then deleting?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179953788
b-jazz (2026-03-17 16:50:30+00:00): Thanks for going back to clean up. Much appreciated. I did find a couple of near-fixes that you should be careful of going forward. See the area around https://openstreetmap.org/node/10274269213 for an example of a fairway still crossing a green.

thanks again for your attention to this.
bartgron (2026-03-16 20:26:26+00:00): Proszę o nierobienie zmian "w cały świat" i o niepsucie mapy
Rubenke (2026-03-16 22:23:08+00:00): Nogmaals zoals ik ook bij vorige vroeg, lees de informatie bij tag 'voetpad' eens door en dit soort aanpassingen helpen niet bij de routing in tegendeel.
Bovendien wordt het er slordig van.
eggie (2026-03-17 08:56:38+00:00): Beste jj,

Wanneer je op deze manier trottoirs mapt zal het niet meer correct routeren.
Je zit er immers op gevangen.
Wanneer dan ook de hoofdrijbanen op slot worden gezet krijg je enorme omwegen.
Consensus is dat het op beide manieren mag, maar zorg dan in ieder geval svp voor voldoende verbindingen.
Ga er svp niet van uit dat medemappers het maar moeten opknappen.
Mvg,
eggie
jj000 (2026-03-17 09:01:23+00:00): De footways zijn gewoon verbonden. Of direct aan de weg of via de 'link' tag. Ik ben hier vrijwillig in een bekend stukje wijk bezig met footways. Eerst kon je hier helemaal niet doorheen navigeren. Dit is een open platform, dus iedereen mag mijn werk corrigeren.
eggie (2026-03-17 09:05:50+00:00): Dat laatste is een open deur.
Maar het lijkt handig om op die ronde hoeken dan direct zelf verbindingen met de kruispunten te maken.
Groet,
eggie
jj000 (2026-03-17 09:08:11+00:00): Daar ben ik het mee eens. Mijn doel is altijd stukjes compleet af te maken, dus komt goed!
eggie (2026-03-17 09:10:02+00:00): 👍
Rubenke (2026-03-17 10:45:33+00:00): Zou je buiten dat ik hier zeker geen voorstander van ben omdat het zaken onnodig complex maakt en het een wir war aan paden kruisingen en stoepen wordt. En wat is er tegen om het gewoon zo te houden?  Maar als je het dan toch zo graag doet, iig de juiste tags aan de paden willen geven. Voeg ze toe als stoep of gebruik footway: sidewalk (is het zelfde).
NeisBot (2026-03-16 14:18:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/178893455 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "car repair shop"
---
Örneğin metnin daha tarafsız ve gerçek bir versiyonu şöyle olabilir: "araba tamirhanesi"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-24 17:33:13+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180366179
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
NeisBot (2026-03-16 14:18:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/304854866 v1 | 11 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/3094462114 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179954081
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-16 19:51:48+00:00): które części tej edycji były zamierzone a które zrobione niechcący ?

http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=179954081
bartgron (2026-03-16 20:18:08+00:00): Zestaw zmian został wycofany. Pozdrawiam
MappingMore (2026-03-18 15:21:23+00:00): Revert of 179950027
RCRalph (2026-03-16 18:52:53+00:00): Cześć, jakie jest źródło tej zmiany?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-16 19:50:23+00:00): por https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179954255
Carto_Graph (2026-03-19 16:05:42+00:00): Прошу прощения. Убирал с карты снесённые, этот случайно зацепил.
RCRalph (2026-03-16 18:52:51+00:00): Cześć, jakie jest źródło tej zmiany?
betelgeza1971 (2026-03-16 18:57:25+00:00): Słownik języka włoskiego i racjonalne myślenie. Jeśli się oznacza jakieś miejsce, to trzeba wcześniej sprawdzić co proponowana nazwa oznacza. Ja dodałem polskie tłumaczenie nazwy.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-16 19:49:35+00:00): w nazwie jest nazwa, nie opis nazwy

nie dajemy tam etymologii, tłumaczenia skąd nazwa pochodzi itp

wycofuję jako błędne
Yunkers (2026-03-16 19:50:36+00:00): Z włoskiego 5, z historii jednak pała. W nazwie chodzi o pana Francesco Nullo, a nie o włoskie słowo. O innych błędach rozpisywać się nie będę bo jakimś cudem udało ci się ich popełnić kilka. Zmiana będzie zaraz wycofana.
TranslatorPS (2026-03-16 19:58:59+00:00): Nazwa w tym przypadku przystanku jest nazwą urzędową, narzuconą odpowiednimi aktami prawa lokalnego (w tym przypadku Uchwałą Rady Miasta Krakowa). Tag name na takim przystanku zawiera tylko i wyłącznie jego nazwę, a nie żadne uzasadnienia ani tłumaczenia.

Notabene, nazwy języków piszemy małą literą.
bartgron (2026-03-16 20:47:04+00:00): Ilość błędów w tej edycji mnie powala
Bienson (2026-03-17 01:18:30+00:00): Selbe unsinnige name-Tags
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-17 06:35:28+00:00): da ist nichts unsinnig. Die Wege heißen so.  Zusätze () rausgenommen.
Bienson (2026-03-18 03:14:46+00:00): Genau deswegen waren sie ja unsinnig. Dass sie tatsächlich so heißen, zweifel ich nicht an.
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-19 07:43:13+00:00): Alles klar. Vielen Dank für die Aufklärung und Unterstützung. VG
Bienson (2026-03-17 01:19:52+00:00): Der Name des Weges ist also "Hainbuchenallee (historischer Wegename)"?
c674a (2026-07-07 20:22:32+00:00): Ciao, a cosa serve questo contorno? L'arsenale vedo che ha già la sua area che definisce il perimetro.
Bienson (2026-03-17 01:20:37+00:00): Der Name des Weges ist also "Birkenallee (historischer Wegename)"?
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-17 06:36:36+00:00): so ist es!
HellMap (2026-04-04 17:55:20+00:00): Hello,

In this edit you connected highways with waterways. This is incorrect - waterways should never share nodes with roads unless there are literal fords there, i.e. road goes through water. Please fix these instances.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4974702495
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5044879524
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4969866649
and a couple more that were already fixed.
DenchikBorovoy2011 (2026-03-24 16:38:36+00:00): Вы видимы неверные теги расставили. Прочитайте внимательнее Соглашение, и больше так не делайте! osm.wiki/RU:Highway_classification
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-03-19 02:30:15+00:00): Retagging Grand Teton Drive and Losee Road to track roads instead of under-construction tertiary roads will leave behind some tertiary stubs at 5th Street and Sandstone Ranch Parkway. What should be done about this?
Joseph R P (2026-03-19 23:40:40+00:00): I wouldn't worry too much about classification 'stubs' for under-construction roads since they aren't routable, and it is often the only way to tag the future classification of the completed road when the road is being built in segments.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-03-20 02:08:18+00:00): Okay, I guess that makes sense.
Unrelated, but a long time ago, I downgraded Desert Inn Road west of Rainbow Boulevard to secondary. A few days ago, I upgraded Sky Vista Drive to primary because: a) It is the westernmost arterial (for now) of somewhat high importance, similar to how Hollywood Boulevard is the easternmost arterial of the Valley; and (b) it has a freeway connection, making it (IMO) more important than other arterials in the region, like Desert Foothills Drive and Park Drift Trail.
Between these two, I upgraded a small portion of Sunset Road with connection to CC 215 to primary. Are these classifications okay? If not, what's the best way to reclassify them (and Desert Inn Road between Durango Drive and Town Center Drive)?