piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
zstadler (2026-03-26 07:06:26+00:00): Hello Bezetha,

In the past days you have been deleting bike trails. These trails are a result of mapping efforts by others.

What is the reason of these deletions?

Please stop deleting and respond to the comments asking for clarifications in these two pages:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180424533
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180429240

Please note that OSM best practices request the use of meaningful changeset descriptions.
Bezetha (2026-04-02 10:10:41+00:00): Hello all.
Editing made due to misunderstanding, assuming duplications.
I edited again to recover and connect said trails.
Please mind the importance of marking bike trail with their purposed dashed line, not to be confused with overlapping duplicated foot paths.
zstadler (2026-04-02 12:06:19+00:00): Hello Bezetha,
In OSM there is a clear separation between the mapping data - the OSM database, and the many maps that use it. 
The marking of bike trail is up to the designer of each map, including the default map at osm.org.

The term used for the visualisation of the data is "rendering". Mappers are expected to follow the "Don't map for the renderer" practice 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer

The deletion of the colour, image and website tags of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16358371 is unrelated to any duplications. It should be avoided.
Edalph4 (2026-03-30 11:51:51+00:00): Hi, this change is erroneous. I do not want to futher worsen the situtation , could someone help me on everting this edit ?
iandees (2026-03-25 22:21:40+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12039299449 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180429903, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
iandees (2026-03-25 23:18:52+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11981750531 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180431207, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Famlam (2026-03-31 21:19:30+00:00): Hoi Jxpsert, mogelijk gaat er hier af en toe iets mis, je voegt namelijk ook 2D-gebouwen toe, zeg maar daken zonder oppervlakte ;)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1492933662
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1331583084
jxpsert (2026-03-31 21:22:43+00:00): Juist, ik gebruik vaak de building geometrie om het hek recht te tekenen. Dan gebeuren er soms gekke dingen als je niet oplet, blijkbaar.

Ik kijk morgen even naar een fix.
NeisBot (2026-03-25 22:39:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/204526386 v12 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/255189336 v14 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/406613257 v8 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/2145258893 v6

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180430269
NeisReview (2026-04-03 04:33:13+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180449217
kabelhaai (2026-05-03 17:20:03+00:00): Ter informatie, het adresveld mag je leeg laten op nodes die zich in een gebouw (met adres) bevinden. Deze tag wordt automatisch herkend met het adres waar het object zich in bevindt. Je hoeft het niet over te nemen of te kopieeren.

mvg
Himké (2026-03-25 23:07:24+00:00): Reversion of blanket changes from edits by jamaps. Use Trunk Road classification for Highway 409 under GTAA jurisdiction and classify links according to connecting road hierarchy.
NeisBot (2026-03-25 23:03:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13680522969 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Plumbing company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-03 04:33:12+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180793789
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 10:24:18+00:00): Reverted added SEO POI with malformed tags sourced from Google Maps in changeset 184129948

https://osm.org/changeset/184129948
kabelhaai (2026-05-03 17:12:46+00:00): Dag Steve, bedankt voor je edits in het Mechelse. Graag wil je er op wijzen dat de tag fee=no meer gebruikt wordt en alsmede ook herkend wordt door navigator apps. charge=free wordt beter vervangen door https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fee

bedankt
b-jazz (2026-03-26 05:59:21+00:00): Hey Numac, 

Your rough's are all over the place, crossing fairways, greens, cart paths and everything. I'm planning on deleting them in 24 hours, but wanted to give you a chance to clean them up first. Please let me know when you've fixed them up.
Numac (2026-03-31 01:29:51+00:00): Please allow me time to delete. Having issues get access to the OSM too busy right now. I will correct them 
as soon as i get the files pulled
Numac (2026-03-31 01:31:33+00:00): Arrrrrgh!!!
OlasMapy (2026-03-26 12:57:53+00:00): What is your vehicle? Because it must be very fast.
bxl-forever (2026-03-26 13:21:07+00:00): Joke aside, this changeset modified one single way in the following countries/places: Norway, France, Switzerland, Mallorca, Canary Islands, Argentina, and Singapore.  All in the same edit.  Plus one other changeset in Montenegro which was uploaded at the same time.

We often see large bounding boxes when people travel and upload a changeset containing edits from both past and current locations.  But it is unusual to see people edit only one single item during an entire trip.

@ioui12: Your previous upload from StreetComplete was two days in Croatia, therefore the edits in those 8 distant places were entered on March 24 or March 25.  Were there obtained from surveys or did you use another source?
Sylabowy Kot (2026-03-26 16:08:34+00:00): Can't the StreetComplete API divide such a data packet per location? Maybe DWG should do something about that.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-06 13:00:16+00:00): @ioui12 Have you surveyed on foot any of this locations?

If not - on basic of what this data was edited?

Are your other edits similar?
Zol87 (2026-03-27 14:28:30+00:00): Are there now traffic lights at Lake/Long?
nickvet419 (2026-03-27 18:18:05+00:00): thanks,  missed that, I think I just replaced a marked feature that was there as I was redrawing things, but its not a traffic light.
World_Winner (2026-03-26 09:30:15+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 180444304
NeisBot (2026-03-26 00:21:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 20 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/574608125 v5 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/781771164 v1 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/781771171 v1 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5515086784 v2
https://osm.org/node/5515086776 v2
https://osm.org/node/7298980979 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180432102
iandees (2026-03-26 00:47:15+00:00): Hello,

You're using the wrong tags for an apartment building. You're changing it to use "apartment complex", which is meant to cover the land around a grouping of apartment buildings.

Also, the "description" isn't meant for SEO text, it's meant to capture a description of the object if there aren't existing tags to describe it.

Thanks for your other improvements to the map.
rodolfovargas (2026-03-26 13:30:17+00:00): Buenos aportes. En EDIFICIOS con muchos quiebres, es válido GENERALIZAR la forma. Los nombres propios en MINUSCULAS. Considera aplicar FOTOINTERPRETACIÓN para delinear los edificios, no te guien por las sombras o los techos. 
Continua aportando : )
World_Winner (2026-03-27 03:56:57+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 180483424 ,180451249
NeisBot (2026-03-26 01:03:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13680744818 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Car window shades supplier"

#MapWithoutSpam
nevw (2026-03-26 06:08:45+00:00): Hi, I used Esri World Imagery; Mapbox Satellite which are available to you too in the iD editor to add the new buildings plus others in the block. I decided to map the roof lines using mainly Mapbox Satellite imagery and did not adjust to ground level as there are no gps traces to help align the imagery anyway. 
I also abbreviated your description.
Can you check if the business location is correct.
Wildsharky (2026-04-01 14:28:08+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180490302
iandees (2026-03-26 01:50:45+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12616754248 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180433211, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Supaplex (2026-03-26 05:19:39+00:00): 如果已經是施工狀態再行移除建築與道路
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180433238
MappingMore (2026-03-27 13:16:25+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180502002
rodolfovargas (2026-03-26 13:15:57+00:00): Buenos aportes. Considera ESCUADRAR los edificios (aplica Q en el teclado).
Continua mapeando.
Wildsharky (2026-04-01 14:31:41+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180492890
felipeeugenio (2026-03-26 12:54:05+00:00): Hola. Por favor no confundir el recinto con las estructuras. Le puso building= a todo. Además, el camino que ingresa al mall no es un residencial. Fue corregido todo.

Gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180433898
Glassman (2026-03-27 01:10:59+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180433984
cuzi (2026-03-28 10:46:52+00:00): Olá! Vi que as casas foram desenhadas todas encostadas, como se estivessem ligadas parede com parede. Tem a certeza de que isso corresponde à realidade? Pode confirmar, por favor?
cuzi (2026-04-14 18:07:47+00:00): fixed
Cabinda_mapping (2026-04-19 04:11:27+00:00): Olá,

Não entendo por que alteraste novamente algo que eu já tinha editado com base em conhecimento real do local. Eu nasci, cresci e vivo nesta área, portanto tenho um conhecimento profundo e direto da realidade no terreno.

As edições que fiz não foram aleatórias — levaram tempo e foram feitas com base naquilo que existe de facto. Ao refazeres tudo sem esse conhecimento local, acabaste por introduzir imprecisões.

Peço, por favor, que revejas e restaures o que foi alterado incorretamente. Se houver dúvidas, podemos discutir antes de fazer mudanças, mas é importante respeitar quem tem conhecimento direto da área.

Obrigado.
cuzi (2026-04-19 10:05:16+00:00): Como o objetivo deste changeset era atualizar a rede de estradas, removi apenas edifícios extremamente grandes que estavam a sobrepor outros e que não são visíveis em nenhuma imagem de satélite. Pelo que vejo agora, tudo parece estar em ordem.
rarad74 (2026-03-26 10:58:10+00:00): Daca pui strada Lujerului ca secondary te poti trezi rutat pe sus cand vii de pe Virtutii in loc sa te bage prin Pasajul Lujerului daca vrei sa o tai direct prin pasaj. Nu degeaba au fost scazute rank-urile drumurilor de la suprafata.
KD9UCG (2026-03-27 14:57:34+00:00): Flock camera has a yellow sticker on the pole. Sticker reads big brother is watching you..
Wildsharky (2026-04-01 14:39:06+00:00):  Partially reverted in changeset id:180575437
TheSwavu (2026-03-26 10:23:11+00:00): Hello,

You have mapped your business onto the canopy at the BP Servo.

If your business is in Milang, then that is about 20 km down the road on the Lake.

I have removed the tagging here.
JenayaKN (2026-03-26 10:56:15+00:00): Yes that was our old address we have an office in front of the BP however we are now working from "home" in Milang this is why address for Milang adjustment was more Vauge.
fortera_au (2026-03-26 21:50:39+00:00): Businesses shouldn't be mapped in OSM if they don't have a physical presence someone can just walk up to.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180434792
Supaplex (2026-03-26 04:39:35+00:00): 請一棟一棟建築，而非簡略的將好幾棟為成一棟
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180434804
Supaplex (2026-03-26 04:39:20+00:00): 請一棟一棟建築，而非簡略的將好幾棟為成一棟
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180435019
Supaplex (2026-03-26 04:39:07+00:00): 請一棟一棟建築，而非簡略的將好幾棟為成一棟
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180435063
ajmat (2026-03-28 05:31:44+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180529167
Udarian (2026-03-26 04:28:33+00:00): my bad I copied the wrong text, this was supposed to be:
"updated ref (and related tags) values of SR A1A in Broward County as consensus has been formed to use SR in ref's in Florida #Flo_FL->SR_convert"
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Udarian (2026-03-26 04:28:49+00:00): my bad I copied the wrong text, this was supposed to be:
"updated ref (and related tags) values of SR A1A in Broward County as consensus has been formed to use SR in ref's in Florida #Flo_FL->SR_convert"
rarad74 (2026-03-26 10:02:53+00:00): Se pare ca esti extrem de incapatanat. Ai 5 editari si te spargi in figuri pe aici cu incompetentii tai de la primaria bucuresti. te rog lasa-ne!!!!!
rarad74 (2026-03-26 10:05:36+00:00): Practi c ai ciuruit harta asta si ti-ai batut joc de munca altora de ani de zile. Nu asa se face. Nu iti impui ca nou venit regulile pe aici fara sa discuti cu nimeni. AI ciuruit si bulevardul Ion Mihalache si nici macar nu ai schimbat toate partile de drum.
rarad74 (2026-03-26 06:55:20+00:00): Salut. De ce schimbi categorii de drumuri pentru care rutarea functioneaza foarte bine de ani de zile?
rarad74 (2026-03-26 07:01:39+00:00): Doar bulevardele principale cu rol de colecttor de trafic se pun ca si seccondary roads. Cele care prelungesc drumuri nationale ce traverseaza orasele se pot pune si Primary Roads, dar cele care fac legaturi mai putin importante intre drumuri principale si totusi sunt folosite pentru trafic se put pune cel mult tertiare.
user_15202633 (2026-03-26 07:04:01+00:00): Salut, aplicațiile de hartă inclusiv Organic Maps folosesc variații ale algoritmului lui Dijkstra sau A* fiind irelevant dacă este Primar sau Secundar în OSM. Categoriile de drum ar trebui să reflecte documentele oficiale ale primăriei. https://aspmb.ro/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/listastrazi.pdf
user_15202633 (2026-03-26 07:08:06+00:00): Clasificarea şi încadrarea drumurilor | Ordonanţă 43/1997 
Art. 9. -
Străzile din localităţile urbane se clasifică în raport cu intensitatea traficului şi cu funcţiile pe care le îndeplinesc, astfel:

a) străzi de categoria I - magistrale, care asigură preluarea fluxurilor majore ale oraşului pe direcţia drumului naţional ce traversează oraşul sau pe direcţia principală de legătură cu acest drum;

b) străzi de categoria a II-a - de legătură, care asigură circulaţia majoră între zonele funcţionale şi de locuit;

c) străzi de categoria a III-a - colectoare, care preiau fluxurile de trafic din zonele funcţionale şi le dirijează spre străzile de legătură sau magistrale;

d) străzi de categoria a IV-a - de folosinţă locală, care asigură accesul la locuinţe şi pentru servicii curente sau ocazionale, în zonele cu trafic foarte redus.
rarad74 (2026-03-26 07:52:21+00:00): Nu are treaba ordonantele locale cu functionarea unei harti de navigare. Clasificareea este facuta si trebuie facuta dupa regulile openstreetmap , sau dupa trraficul din zona. Nu amestecam treburile primariei cu ceea ce facem noi aici. Se pot modifica strazi aici in principal daca intra in lucru , reabilitare si se vor pune restrictiile specifice pentru drumuri in lucru. Aici nu stunem doar utilizatori de rand, sunt si companii renumite care se ocupa de mentenata hartii pentru aplicatiile lor, cum sunt Apple, Microsoft, TomTom, Bolt si alte companii de taxi, etc.
user_15202633 (2026-03-26 07:55:48+00:00): Pe scurt hotărârea atestă condițiile actuale de drum și include analiza urbanistică a drumurilor inclusiv fluxurile de trafic din cartierele dense cu multe blocuri.
rarad74 (2026-03-26 10:12:01+00:00): Foarte putine aplicatii si acele nu sunt cele mai utilizate. Mai exista aplicatii mult mai performante ale celor de la Magic Earth sau TomTom care nu utilizeaza acel algoritm. Iarasi nu trebuie generalizat. Nu ma lua cu cateva informatii culese de pe net dupa ce ai sapat un pic doar ca sa te contrazici la nesfarsit. Unii de pe aici lucram de prin 2009 pe harta asta. Crede-ma ca avem experienta mai multa. Deja sunt satul de discutiile contradictorii cu tine. Primaria Bucuresti sa isi faca harta singuri. Te rog nu ne mai sugera pe aici legiferarile lor. Chiar NU NE INTERESEAZA ce a horat PMB!!!
eggie (2026-03-26 08:19:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
lanta01 (2026-03-26 08:33:09+00:00): ok bedankt
Minh Nguyen (2026-03-26 05:31:35+00:00): As discussed in: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/migrating-proposed-routes-to-a-lifecycle-prefix/141573
GerdP (2026-06-17 04:56:52+00:00): Die Route 48-59 ist aus meiner Sicht ein Relikt aus längst vergangenen Zeiten, als es im Ammerland noch kein KP-Netz gab. Ich denke, die kann man löschen und eine entsprechene note=* am Wegweiser https://www.osm.org/node/10651981633 anbringen, das der Einschieber für KP48 dort nur noch aus historischen Gründen vorhanden ist. Die Karten im LK OL zeigen halt den alten Stand und werden wohl auch nicht mehr aktualisiert. Das Problem gibt es im LK OL leider an vielen Stellen.
segubi (2026-06-19 20:44:28+00:00): Naja, es gab halt früher ein Knotenpunktnetz nach niederländischem Vorbild, als ich vor 2 Jahren etwas weiter nordöstlich gefahren bin, hatte das noch ziemlichen Bestand. Jetzt scheint es noch so Überlappungen zu geben. Zum Teil sind alte Knotenpunkte erhalten geblieben und haben die neuen Schilder bekommen. Viele sind aber auch geändert, und es gibt Ausschilderungsfehler. Muß man z.T. noch ein bißchen abwarten, denke ich.
GerdP (2026-06-20 03:58:37+00:00): Rund um den LK Oldenburg sind neue Netze entstanden (Stadt OL, LK Diepholz,LK Wesermarsch) und im LK Cloppenburg wurde das Netz engmaschiger. Die Wegweiser im LK OL wurden nur an manchen Stellen angepasst, die Karten bisher gar nicht. Auch Mängel wie fehlende Einschieber oder Zwischernwegweiser werden seit Jahren ignoriert. Möglicherweise wartet man ab, bis alle anderen Netze fertig sind und macht dann eine große Nachrüstaktion oder auch gleiche eine Restrukturierung wie in CLP.
Warin61 (2026-03-30 22:37:04+00:00): Hi.
Mulptipoygon outer ways cannot share segments. 
See blue segments in https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=176.25120&lat=-38.14064&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Warin61 (2026-04-11 00:31:41+00:00): I have taken the mall buildings and the Pukeroa Oruawhata House building relations and deleted them.
I have replace them with simple ways with appropriate ways. 
The OSM guide is one feature = one OSM entry .. as the Mall has one entry that covers the entire block under a landuse key I have removed the mall name on the building. 

I think that should do? 
.
Robert Whittaker (2026-03-26 08:20:14+00:00): In this changeset you made two changes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13674845202 , neither of which are correct: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180437117

(1) You changed the brand:wikidata tag from the correct value of "Q80963064" to the incorrect form of a web address https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q80963064 .

(2) You reverted a change I had just made to correct the web address for the branch from https://www.gsfcarparts.com/branches/SheffieldNorth to https://www.gsfcarparts.com/branches/sheffieldnorth .

For the latter, while both URL's work, it is the lowercase version that is listed in the website's sitemap and the lowercase version that results users end up at if they go the website and search for that branch. So that is the lowercase URL we should use in OSM.

I've now reverted this changeset.

I'm not sure exactly what RightChoice.ai is, but the edits here seem rather suspect. Can you confirm how it is deciding on changes, and that that there is human validation of anything that is being suggested before it is actioned?
CRCulver (2026-03-26 09:47:08+00:00): I left a note here saying that the new park should be traced when new aerial imagery became available. You closed my note, but your trace of the park is very low-quality. Esri imagery does not yet show the park, so what source were you using? I will revert this change if you cannot create an accurate trace.
D=SW (2026-03-26 15:46:03+00:00): I actually used Esri World Imagery for the trace. I believe the quality is acceptable given the current sources. However, if you feel it's not up to standard, please feel free to revert it. I don’t mind at all.