piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2026-04-10 22:22:27+00:00): See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/betrunkene-near-mallorca/142877/34 for context; please add this back if it is correct.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-04-09 17:36:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 181109944 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious changes in Mallorca.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20118
Raquel Dezidério Souto (2026-07-25 18:32:01+00:00): Por favor, onde está registrado este nome "Beco do Miau"?
McKulkin (2026-03-29 00:13:53+00:00): Tourists need to be kept off this segment. Highly likely it will be reopened once works in the main park area are done ("soon"). Hopefully, locals won't see the `name:en` tag rendering, so only the foreigners would be "affected".
McKulkin (2026-03-29 00:14:51+00:00): See mapillary.com for relevant signpost image.
FajrAl (2026-04-07 05:33:11+00:00): jika ada bangunan yang menimpa jalan, sebaiknya dipindakan saja sesuaikan dengan citra satelitnya, bukan dihapus.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180563604
MappingMore (2026-03-31 07:48:21+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180659584
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-29 11:43:44+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/5863887

Thanks @Spypoke
NeisAgent (2026-03-29 04:33:27+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 11:39:03+00:00): Reverted changing street name into SHOUTING CASE with source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184428076

https://osm.org/changeset/184428076
Yuri Matias (2026-03-29 16:33:31+00:00): Não teria que colocar essa indicação nas vias/semáforos pertinentes?
muralito (2026-04-06 20:32:14+00:00): You tagged headlight=not_required but the traffic signs ask for "Farol Aceso" and the "headligths on" symbol. in a lot of highways in RS, SC and PR. That said, you can hardly see cars with their headlights turned on, so, or it requierement is not enforced, or if car has DRL there is no need for headlight on.
Frank Peng (2026-03-29 02:45:23+00:00): Thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180564777
SomeoneElse (2026-04-01 21:27:35+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13687300383/history
has no recognised OSM tags on it.  Can you explain what it is?
Best Regards,
Andy
MappingMore (2026-03-31 07:40:16+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180659163
alena9292 (2026-06-09 12:31:38+00:00): Здравствуйте, поправьте пожалуйста, полигон здания, в данный момент дом расположен на дороге.
NeisBot (2026-03-29 03:45:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13687638934 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Diagnostic Laboratory"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-06 04:33:04+00:00): 🗑️🤖 Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/180923498
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-30 08:54:04+00:00): NB, way 1493791589 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493791589 doesn't seem to fit the definition of landuse=grass https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass , which is intended for (typically smaller) areas of mown, managed grass like a lawn or verge.

The plant cover here looks more or less natural rather than carefully managed, which would be landuse=heath or landuse=grassland , or possibly landuse=meadow if it is used for agriculture, rather than landuse=grass.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180566878
iismitch55 (2026-03-30 15:25:43+00:00): Historical satellite imagery shows hay bails in previous years, indicating managed land. I would be inclined to convert to [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmland](landuse=farmland).
iismitch55 (2026-03-30 15:26:25+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmland
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-31 08:24:26+00:00): Ahh, I see. Thanks for checking!

landuse=farmland is specifically for growing food crops as mentioned on that page, while landuse=meadow (mentioned above) would be more appropriate for managed grassland for agricultural use, such as hay ( meadow=agricultural ), livestock ( meadow=pasture ), horses ( meadow=paddock ), etc. It would seem based on your assessment of it being managed, landcover=grass and being used for hay that it should be landuse=meadow meadow=agriculture , rather than landuse=farmland , no?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180566878
iismitch55 (2026-03-31 16:14:07+00:00): Changed to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=meadow in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180681484#map=18/37.185607/-80.381038. It may be worth reviewing https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=farmland use locally, as it appears to be a catch all for any farm. I've certainly modeled my change sets to follow that pre-existing pattern.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-04-01 08:19:40+00:00): Yup, that's a good point--I've definitely seen it used much more broadly than intended. I have tentative plans to address it in a landuse=* pass over the area at some point, but if you get to it before then by all means for go it!
iandees (2026-03-29 12:23:23+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12829758207, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9209362596 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180580590, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Fraxi (2026-03-29 11:23:00+00:00): Здравейте!
Благодаря за въведните имена на улици! Но в българската общност имаме установена практика да не вписваме "ул." пред името. Можете да видите повече тук - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bg:WikiProject_Bulgaria#%D0%98%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B8_%D0%B8_%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B4%D0%B8 
И по принцип като прегледате това уики може да се запознаете по-подробно с практиките за картографиране в OSM.
NeisBot (2026-03-29 06:42:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13687890134 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Airport transfer point"
---
Például egy semlegesebb és tényekhez közelebb álló verzió a szövegednek lehetne: "Repülőtéri átszállási pont"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-06 10:33:05+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180568447
MappingMore (2026-03-31 10:07:51+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180664943
FajrAl (2026-04-03 15:31:43+00:00): Harap diperhatikan lagi. Tidak perlu tag bridge=aqueduct dan tag layer=1.
NeisBot (2026-03-29 08:46:19+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, Adam Ferreira.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Adjusted node geometry"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
Wildsharky (2026-04-01 13:03:34+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180652838
NeisAgent (2026-03-29 10:33:17+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
user_23989730 (2026-03-30 12:02:47+00:00): I sincerely apologize for editing the content without first reviewing the rules.
I conducted an on-site inspection today, but I will delete the content for now.
I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.
Dimitar155 (2026-03-29 18:55:15+00:00): Здравейте и благодаря за промените!

Начина по който бяхте отбелязали част от имената на улиците не е коректен, тъй като излиза че има две улици с една и съща геометрия, което не е вярно.

Правилния начин е улиците да се разделят на отделни сегменти и те да се именуват. Това става чрез избиране на дадена точка и натискане на буквата X (или десен бутон и избиране на ножицата).

Оправих ги, така че да няма дублирана геометрия, но бих бил благодарен ако ги прегледате отново и коригирате, ако нещо не е както трябва.

Поздрави,
Митко
NeisBot (2026-03-29 08:08:22+00:00): Hi Purumi, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 2 barrier(s)
- 425 building(s)
- 437 highway(s)
- 5 landuse(s)
- 2 leisure(s)
- 157 name(s)
- 54 natural(s)
- 6 power(s)
- 1 sport(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180570434
woodpeck (2026-03-29 08:21:10+00:00): Aerial imagery seems to support the technical infrastructure that was mapped here, and that was deleted by Purumi. Purumi, please explain which of these edits were "malicious" in your opinion.
Purumi (2026-04-08 07:09:43+00:00): 我实地探访过，这片区域并非联通，而是属于两个公司。并且，路过于密集，很多地方并不是可供车行驶的"路"，极其容易造成误导。
george1201 (2026-04-09 22:03:19+00:00): Das Restaurant hat noch nicht wiedereröffnet. Ich habe es wieder auf disused gesetzt.
Bitte den Unterschied zwischen start_date und opening_date beachten.
juni_vv (2026-03-29 10:49:27+00:00): Hey there, it seems you've made edits in multiple countries in the same changeset. Please keep edits far away from each other in separate changesets in the future. Make sure to add a comment detailing what the edits are, too.

Happy mapping!
Juniper
silversurfer83 (2026-03-29 19:01:26+00:00): Hi MapMop,

the AED you placed in the Park in southern Germany: Was that intentional? If yes please add defibrilator:location=* (a helpful explanation as to where *exactly* the AED is located) and opening_hours=*

(also, if that AED was deliberate: Straight to the east across the grass is an ATM glued to the footway. I believe that is incorrect, is it not? You haven't added it, I know. It's just that you might have local knowledge if the AED was placed on purpose)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180571880
DerMapMop (2026-03-29 19:48:39+00:00): Good Evening,
first, to Answer the Comment from juni_vv: I dont know why Organic Maps did not made a new changset for the Changes in Scotland (I added the other Change (in Germany about 9 months ago).
I only updated the Websites (Historic Environment Scotland changed theire website structure a few years ago). I forgot to Describe the Changes and will add Descriptions in the Future (Sorry).

Now to the Comment from silversurfer83: The AED was added intentional to the Map (about 9 months  ago). Its positioned on an Outside Wall of an Buillding that is not on the Map (its a kind of big Shack). 
The AED is accessible around the clock.
I could not create the building in the app i used.
The ATM does not Exist (The stated Bank is also not an Local one).

Sorry for the confusion. I will add more details the future (im new to mapping).

Thanks to you both and a good night.
silversurfer83 (2026-03-30 19:47:14+00:00): Hello MapMop

thanks fot the swift and thorough reply.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap, good to have new people who help. There is no shame in being new and not knowing all of the guidelines so don't worry too much about the size of the changeset.

About the ATM: I thought so. I'll remove it now and shall amend some details about the AED.

Should you decide to continue mapping we'd be more than happy about that and there are always many people ready to help with questions. Visit c.osm.org, wiki.osm.org or an OSM-Signal group for more info

safe travels
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180571880
DerMapMop (2026-03-31 17:51:13+00:00): Thank You, I will Continue Mapping (after more knowledgeabout it). OSM is a awesome project.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180571880
eggie (2026-03-29 09:15:35+00:00): Hoi..
Tip  Je zou eens naar editor JOSM kunnen kijken en dan de validator draaien. Dan zou je zien dat op een aantal plaatsen die bosgebieden niet goed aansluiten al zie je dat nauwelijks. Het is wel netjes gedaan. Het geeft wel foutmeldingen. Hier heb ik de overlap gerepareerd. 

editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047

MVG
eggie
Hnsptrs (2026-03-29 14:06:59+00:00): Bedankt voor de reactie, ik heb JOSM geprobeerd maar verdwaal een beetje in de mogelijkheden.
Zal nog wat extra letten op de aansluitingen..

gr.
Hans
eggie (2026-03-29 14:23:02+00:00): Oke.. maar kan ook simpel beginnen. Ik gebruik nog niet de helft van de mogelijkheden.. Al zou je alleen de validator maar draaien... de rest komt vanzelf wel.
Hnsptrs (2026-03-29 15:51:09+00:00): Is er ook een manier om buurgebieden na verwijderen van een pad/weg wat eenvoudiger op elkaar aan te laten sluiten of blijft dat nijver handwerk?
De achterblijvende witte ondergrond vind ik niet echt mooi en ook wat verwarrend..
eggie (2026-03-29 16:09:46+00:00): De witruimte komt door de import vanuit 3dshapes. Het kadaster werkt immers met percelen.
Er liggen niet altijd paden tussen.
Samenvoegen kan makkelijker met josm. Daar kun je gereedschapskisten implementeren. Dan trek je de vlakken over elkaar heen en kiest voor samenvoegen.
Dat wel volledig doen anders krijg je mp's met inners.
Soms is het weer handig om die percelen te behouden. Je kunt immers aangeven welke boomsoort het betreft. Loof of naald..Dat rendert anders.
eggie (2026-03-29 16:13:07+00:00): Ik gebruik ook vaak de plugin PolygonCutOut.
Zie wiki.. om water en land te scheiden. Maar die kun je ook gebruiken om land netjes van land te scheiden. Dan zit het netjes aan elkaar. Je snijdt dan het gewenste stuk land uit.
Hnsptrs (2026-03-29 18:16:18+00:00): Ga eens rondkijken, bedankt..
NeisBot (2026-03-29 08:45:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1331737586 v2 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/901305798 v9 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/12321576755 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180572462
iandees (2026-03-29 12:24:07+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12321576755, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12321592622 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180580608, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
silversurfer83 (2026-03-29 18:54:17+00:00): Hi :)

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich das jemand ansieht.

Also: Sieht ganz ok aus. Adresse direkt eingetragen, Gebäudetyp und auch die Geschosszahl.

Was kann besser? Die Südwestkante hat 3 überflüssige Punkte. Die können weg und anschließend das Gebäude mit "Q" rechtwinklig machen.

Happy mapping :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180572690
BCNorwich (2026-03-29 10:05:27+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The deli is only a small part of the whole building, so the whole building should not be tagged as a deli. Further, there is a POI for the deli. OSM has a principle of one element for one feature. Thus I've placed your new tags from the building to the POI.

Regards Bernard.
ralley (2026-03-30 19:04:54+00:00): You have created 2 churches within a few metres of each other.
Cookie_Cream (2026-03-30 21:30:33+00:00): Yes these are separate orgs that use the same venue (or parts of the same venue).
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-30 06:09:48+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180573879
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-30 06:13:11+00:00): For your information: This here in OpenStreetMap is the production database. Please do not add any planning or project data to the database for testing purposes that you intend to delete afterward. The OSM project provides its own dedicated test environments for that. Thank you.
NeisBot (2026-03-29 09:24:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1103662317 v1 | 9 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/10099310654 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180573782
iandees (2026-03-29 12:24:07+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10099310654 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180580610, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
bartgron (2026-03-29 17:07:53+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany z powodu błędów.
Pozdrawiam
NeisBot (2026-03-29 09:27:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/212116468 v5 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1688065614 v5

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180573790
bartgron (2026-03-29 16:57:31+00:00): Zestaw zmian został wycofany z powodu błędów.
Pozdrawiam
bartgron (2026-03-29 17:00:14+00:00): Zestaw zmian został wycofany z powodu błędów.
Pozdrawiam
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-30 06:09:43+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180573600
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-30 06:13:18+00:00): For your information: This here in OpenStreetMap is the production database. Please do not add any planning or project data to the database for testing purposes that you intend to delete afterward. The OSM project provides its own dedicated test environments for that. Thank you.
gwahak (2026-04-01 01:58:00+00:00): I understand that sub-admin_level=10 areas are generally not mapped in Brussels. However, this case appears to be structurally different from typical sub-10 divisions.

The “South Extension of Brussels” is not merely a minor local subdivision, but a geographically distinct protrusion of the administrative boundary. This gives it a clear topological and cartographic significance that is not shared by most other sub-10 areas.

Additionally, in OSM practice, enclaves, exclaves, and salient (protruding) boundary segments are often represented as separate subareas.
bxl-forever (2026-04-01 08:32:03+00:00): I get your point but did you read the description of this changeset?  Are you ready to discuss this with the Belgian mapping community?

Also, why did you use an English name for it?  This is not coherent with all our mapping practices and conventions.  Thanks.
Wildsharky (2026-04-01 13:02:45+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180652624
seewäldler (2026-03-30 20:21:50+00:00): Hallo Hegau Bodensee! 
So eine kleine Frage habe ich dennoch zu diesen changeset. Das Gebäude heisst sicher "Besmer"? Oder ist es so, dass das eine Gaststätte ist, die ja auch schon als "Restaurant zum Besmer" in diesem Gebäude gemappt ist, und dieser Name am Gebäude steht? Dann wäre das doch der Name eben dieser Gaststätte und nicht ein Name eines Gebäudes.
Hegau Bodensee (2026-04-01 18:46:16+00:00): Hallo seewädler,
danke der Nachfrage! Das Restaurant sowie die angrenzende Straße ist nach dem ehemaligen Hof Besmer benannt, das Gebäude des Restaurants ist ein Überbleibsel davon. Deshalb habe ich mich dazu entschieden, auch das Gebäude so zu benennen, solltest du anderer Ansicht sein können wir es aber auch gerne wieder ändern, da es von wenig Bedeutung und tatsächlich streitbar ist. LG
seewäldler (2026-04-01 20:45:27+00:00): Hallo Hegau Bodensee! 
Auf der gerenderten Karte ist ja schon das Restaurant mit dem Namen zu sehen, zum Sichtbarmachen sollte das doch reichen. Es gibt halt nicht viele Gebäude, die nach OSM-tagging-Richtlinien wirklich so einen Eigennamen haben und darum finde ich sollte das nicht als "name" am Gebäude stehen.
dondolar$on (2026-03-29 09:58:44+00:00): Building 538805905 has 4 entrances, from 2A to 2D
Building 538805906 also has 4 entrances, 2E to 2H
GinaroZ (2026-04-02 14:11:59+00:00): Thanks for going out and surveying this, I did have my suspicions as it wasn't publicised. Although, there was some traces on Strava heatmap.
I've commented on the original changeset to ask about their process.