piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
hdevine825 (2026-07-21 23:46:12+00:00): Unsure of the stability of that link, here's an archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20260721234526/https://mcclibraryfunctions.azurewebsites.us/api/ordinanceDownload/15708/1348059/pdf
ForestFurnace (2026-07-21 23:45:33+00:00): DCNR maps:
https://elibrary.dcnr.pa.gov/GetDocument?docId=3505104&DocName=d10_Sproul-pumap_1_13_21_.pdf
https://elibrary.dcnr.pa.gov/GetDocument?docId=1753187&DocName=KECR_ParkMap.pdf
https://elibrary.dcnr.pa.gov/PDFProvider.ashx?action=PDFStream&docID=4368467&chksum=&revision=1&docName=FD15+ForrestHDutlingerNaturalAreaFactsheet&nativeExt=pdf
cubbe8 (2026-07-22 03:56:03+00:00): Sorry, but you keep creating an edit war here with editors that are familiar with the current reconstruction of this area. The edits you keep making to this road is incorrect per city and state documents regarding the project, as well as the city GIS. As I have told you before, MassGIS is not updated very often.
cubbe8 (2026-07-22 03:57:41+00:00): https://files.aptuitivcdn.com/GB7r14nbKy-1182/docs/ComDev/Presentation-Con-Com_Revere-Roundabout_2.18.2025-1.pdf
cubbe8 (2026-07-22 03:58:47+00:00): See slides 10 and 11
Frank Peng (2026-07-22 00:15:51+00:00): Revert of changesets 186112210 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186112210) and 185971234 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185971234)
𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ (2026-07-27 11:58:02+00:00): Nie mapujemy pojedynczych pasów - od takich rzeczy jest Wikimapia. Revertuję zmianę.
tian2992 (2026-07-22 23:30:43+00:00): No es necesario para el Mapatón mapear dentro de un cementerio. Enfoca en la tarea.
¡Gracias por mapear!
daviddariorr (2026-07-23 01:22:13+00:00): Lo tendré en cuenta. Muchas gracias por el feedback.
Carnildo (2026-07-22 06:12:09+00:00): You requested a review of this edit on IRC: if the goal is to indicate that only emergency vehicles are allowed to use 15th Street between Franklin and Rhode Island, it looks good to me.

The only thing that might be an issue is that you've marked the middle section (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1542779263) as "vehicle=no".  Most routers include bicycles in "vehicle", so if bicycles are allowed to use it, you'll need to add an explicit "bicycle=yes".
Negreheb (2026-07-22 06:14:44+00:00): Alternative would be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:motor_vehicle%3Dno (makes more sense imo and is cleaner).

But the foot=no at the bollard looks wrong to me? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14038386694
Annotate3767 (2026-07-22 22:29:52+00:00): Thank you both for the review, @Carnildo, @Negreheb.  I definitely needed some advice here, not the least of which that I wasn't even sure that bollards were the right barrier choice!

I've changed it to use motor_vehicle=no and fixed the stray foot=no in #186203862.

Thanks again for your help!
Annotate3767 (2026-07-22 22:31:34+00:00): Hmm, looks like GraphHopper and OSRM are still routing vehicle traffic through that street -- unless it takes time for their databases to update?
Carnildo (2026-07-23 01:13:42+00:00): It takes time.  OSRM has a two-day update cycle; I couldn't find update information for GraphHopper.
B252697 (2026-07-22 02:20:52+00:00): I walked past there yesterday (21 Jul) and realised that the footpaths there were not mapped up to date. While walking there, I awkwardly tried to find paths which I saw was indicated on OpenStreetMap but didn't exist in reality…...
Joel Koen (2026-07-22 07:57:52+00:00): If you select a roundabout, you can press 'O' to turn it into a circle.
Joel Koen (2026-07-22 08:16:00+00:00): If you're unsure about how to tag things, you should look it up on the wiki before changing it, especially before calling it incorrect. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes#Motorway_with_lanes_and_destinations

Reverted in changeset/186163053.
felipeeugenio (2026-07-22 14:31:16+00:00): Hola. Cuidar la ortografía con los tildes porfa.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186152087
MyBeautifulSunflower (2026-07-22 17:11:37+00:00): entendido!
Frans S (2026-07-22 12:02:25+00:00): Helllo. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not add a layer to a building to hide errors. See the instructions, please. 
Best regards.
Frans S (2026-07-22 12:06:48+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
These changesets are reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she deliver high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (See attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings
B: Overlapping buildings.
C: Collected adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
D: Connecting nodes to other features.
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.
F: Buildings partly hidden under trees.


Explanation can be found in this document, which might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards, and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186154536
Totor (2026-07-22 05:16:04+00:00): I removed buildings marked as collapsed back in 2013. 
They have been marked as collapsed after a typhoon, and since then the mapping effort has been abandoned.
This leaves many non existing buildings, rebuilt buildings with the wrong shape, and  few existing buildings tagged as collapsed.
I believe it is better and faster to remove them, and add the reconstructed building with the right shape and position little by little during normal mapping.
silversurfer83 (2026-07-22 19:30:27+00:00): Moin :)

löschen und neu zeichnen ist eher ungern gesehen. Dazu folgende Erklärung: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Keep_the_history

Grüße in den Südkreis

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186156499
Jensefred (2026-07-22 20:19:52+00:00): Ja ich weiss, ich konnte es aber nicht auf geordnete Bahnen bringen,da es 2 Gebäude waren und die auch noch falsch. Sonst hätte ich gefrickelt, was aber nicht ging... 

Gruß ausm Nordkreis
t_ja (2026-07-22 18:25:19+00:00): Ahoj,
je nezvyčajné pridať layer=1 na celú dĺžku cesty https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1542812273 , väčšinou sa jedná o omyl.
Aký bol umýsel pridania tohto tagu?
Comino (2026-07-26 10:18:33+00:00): Hi,

Can you explain why you deleted the standard Bitcoin tags and replaced them with tags that do not exist? Because of your edits “Thai Charoen Center” is no longer shown on BTC Map! 

Please fix your edits.
For future edits please check one of our wiki’s like:
https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Verifying-Existing-Merchants

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-22 07:15:55+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Please use future changeset comments to describe the actual edit and avoid insulting language. Thank you.
Joel Koen (2026-07-22 08:19:09+00:00): You "updated" part of the Pacific Motorway to match Bing, when that imagery is out of date. You can usually check if something is out of date using Esri World Imagery, it updates more often than Bing but isn't as high resolution.

Partially reverted in changeset/186163053
Welxy (2026-07-22 09:09:43+00:00): O café fechou mas agora existe uma "souvenir shop". Quando fiz a alteração ainda não tinha visto que já tinha aberto um negócio novo no mesmo local.
Joel Koen (2026-07-22 07:54:04+00:00): Hello, welcome to OpenStreetMap. Driveways should use the driveway preset instead of being tagged as residential roads.
rarad74 (2026-07-22 09:04:20+00:00): Ce inseamna aia Klasswagen? Unde este tag-ul dedicat categoriei de punct de interes? Nu mai folosi imaginile Bing vechi de mai bine de 10 ani - ai la dispozitie Mapbox si ESRi standard ca sa poti desema cladirea cum trebuie.
nevw (2026-07-22 08:56:25+00:00): Hi, I reverted this because you added the business name to a node forming a pedestrian area. You need to add a new node to the site you operate your business from and add the usual business tags to that. Have a look at how other businesses are tagged to get it done correctly.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-22 20:12:26+00:00): Glazier no glazing!

Probably just an offshore SEO spammer, judging by the spam on the OSM profile.
fluffycupcakes (2026-07-23 11:59:20+00:00): hello, name= tag is only for names in primary local language. For names in other languages, use name:xx= tag, where xx is language code
alpacaMaps (2026-07-29 01:56:26+00:00): This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.

If these cameras are real, please let us know so the map stays accurate. Otherwise, we'd kindly ask that you avoid adding cameras that aren't actually there, and that you remove any temporary or test nodes once you're done.

If this was simply a mistake, no problem at all — just clean up the nodes that don't correspond to a real-world camera, and leave a quick note here so we can help.

Thanks for helping keep OpenStreetMap accurate.

— alpacaMaps
pesticides (2026-07-22 07:39:24+00:00): Created a separate route=bicycle for the ODT so that it hopefully shows up in OpenCycleMap and CyclOSM, the two cycling maps most prominently displayed on https://www.openstreetmap.org/. The main ODT relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1896877) is tagged route=bicycle;foot;inline_skates;horse, which is recognized by few renderers. I do not consider my new relation a case of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer. To quote that wiki page: "Using correct tags to get something rendered is good, using tags mismatching reality to get something rendered is bad."
pesticides (2026-07-23 18:13:45+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186250522
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-22 20:35:17+00:00): As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality of your mapping and avoid consequences for your account and the features you map. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Specifically, you inexplicably removed the landuse=* tagging for this area and instead tagged the entire thing as a building, despite that clearly not being the case, as well as adding a number of POI tags for your business, many malformed while missing any top-level tag actually specifying what it actually is.

While I was tempted to revert it entirely, in the end I fixed all of this for you in changeset 186199505 , pulling the relevant tags out to a POI node, fixing them and adding a missing top-level tag (shop=supermarket), while restoring the landuse=* tag here.

https://osm.org/changeset/186199505
pitfire (2026-07-22 09:08:25+00:00): Hallo Polfi,

willkommen bei OSM und danke für Deinen Beitrag.
Der Änderungssatz 186162295 wirft jedoch einige Fragen auf.
Warum ist die Zufahrt, die laut Luftbild eindeutig erkennbar ist, gelöscht?
Der neue Fußweg verläuft außerhalb der alten Trasse und ist rechtlich nicht
mit mehrspurigen Fahrzeugen zu benutzen. Zudem hast Du den Fußweg
mit ( Schlüssel layer=1 ) versehen. Der sollte nur bei Überlagerung von Elementen (Wegen, Knoten oder Flächen) angegeben werden. 
 
VG pitfire
Polfi (2026-07-23 08:16:05+00:00): Warum ist die Zufahrt, die laut Luftbild eindeutig erkennbar ist, gelöscht?
--> Das frage ich mich auch. Das fehlende Stück zwischen Weg zum "Haus Waldeck" zum südlich gelegenen Forstweg 
besteht seit schon seit mehreren Jahren.

Der neue Fußweg verläuft außerhalb der alten Trasse und ist rechtlich nicht
mit mehrspurigen Fahrzeugen zu benutzen. 
--> Stimmt, nur für Fußgänger, Fahrradfahrer und Reiter des Reitstalls erlaubt.

Zudem hast Du den Fußweg mit ( Schlüssel layer=1 ) versehen. 
--> unbewusst aus mangelnder Erfahrung entstanden.
BerryTrails (2026-07-22 13:32:42+00:00): It should not be classified as Residential. Please don't edit blindly—verify the area, check where the road leads, and review the surrounding road network before making classification changes. Also, don't rely solely on other users' edits. In this case, another user incorrectly changed it to Residential, and instead of correcting the classification, you also changed it to,Residential which propagated the error.
Correted the data
easy_go (2026-07-23 16:44:29+00:00): Hi BerryTrails, thank you for reaching out. I couldn’t find any documentation outlining what the preferred classification would be here so I based my decision on a general search of the area which showed that similar intersections of minor roads with highways such as [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1503398006] and [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1503398005] took the classification of the lower road. However, I also notice there is some inconsistency with link classifications and I am fine deferring to your preference. The imagery I cited from Vantor 2026-07-14 does show that there is a split in this road though so I will update this intersection with the more current modeling and follow your suggestion for this section being classified as a trunk link.
lubaum (2026-07-22 08:23:38+00:00): Hallo liebe(r) Gemeindemapper*n,
1.) wir freuen uns sehr, dass die ganze Rathausverwaltung in Steisslingen jetzt mappt (wie viele Personen?).
2.) Es lassen sich hier in die osm-Datenbank auch geplante Straßen eintragen, welche dann sichtbar werden.
3.) Die geplanten Baufenster  lassen sich auch eintragen.
4.) Ebenso die vorläufig vergebenen Hausnummern - was sehr wichtig wäre für die Rettungsleitstelle von Uwe Rudolf in Radolfzell.
5.) Der iD-Editor ist zwar sehr gut geworden dank Martin Raifer in Heidelberg, aber der richtige Editor ist der JOSM, mit dem viel bessere Editiermöglichkeiten bestehen. Das zeige ich Dir gerne.
LG Ludwig (osm lubaum)
silversurfer83 (2026-07-26 20:01:13+00:00): hi

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1542833191 würde ich wieder löschen, da es a) kein building=* selbst im weiteren OSM-Sinne ist und b) terrace=yes als Zusatz für touristische Einrichtungen gedacht ist. Passt hier also nicht.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186162989
fr9leinfl8schig (2026-07-27 11:18:23+00:00): Hi, ah ok, gut zu wissen. Es ist eher eine überdachte, ins Haus integrierte Terrasse. Dann mache ich ein normales building draus
silversurfer83 (2026-07-27 19:29:07+00:00): Hi :)

ein Dach ist ein building=roof 

Und wie ich an anderer Stelle schon erwähnte ist es für deine Detailarbeit vielleicht nicht verkehrt, wenn du dich ausführlich mit building:part=* auseinandersetzt. Das dürfte dir bei vielen Stellen besser dienen als die Multipolygone.

happy mapping
eggie (2026-07-22 09:49:05+00:00): Hi Micha, I merged your info with the present addressnode.
Greetz,
eggie
totera (2026-07-22 14:45:15+00:00): Ciao f_gonella, hai verificato se questi attraversamenti esistono ancora e se ci sono le strisce? Altrimenti si tratta di una modifica automatica e casi del genere sono soggetti a revert, vedi https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126418471
f_gonella (2026-07-23 14:10:40+00:00): Ciao @totera, li ho anche controllati dalle immagini satellitari. In ogni caso questo changeset ha una cinquantina di modifiche, circoscritte in un'area geografica contenuta, a differenza da quello linkato da te che si estende a tutta l'Italia con 10.000+ modifiche.
bigbug21 (2026-07-25 19:54:36+00:00): Liebes Landratsamt Roth,

vielen Dank für die Ergänzung eines Defibrillators in Wernsbach [1]. An dem kartierten Ort ist eine Wiese, die sich letzte Woche vor Ort auch beobachten ließ. Vermutlich handelt es sich um eine Doppelung zu dem bereits erfassten Gerät [2]. Ich werde den Defi daher gleich löschen.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14038800901
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14027477627
eggie (2026-07-22 09:40:19+00:00): Hoi,

motor_vehicle=yes heb ik verwijderd. dat is default op wegen.. ook op een fietsstraat.
Je zou wel in de tagging het verkeersbord kunnen opnemen van fietsstraat NL:L51

Mapse,
eggie
t_ja (2026-07-22 17:56:33+00:00): Ahoj,
hodnota "111" je oznacenie zony, a nie siete hromadnej dopravy. Tou je prave "Integrovany dopravny system Plus", ktory pokryva uzemie zilinskeho a trencianskeho samospravneho kraja.
Ak by si chcel vylepsit tagovanie zastavok, tu sa mozes inspirovat: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14003347792 (chybaju tam tagy "bench"+"bin"+"tactile_paving", ktore ale uz mas, a este by bolo vhodne pridat osvetlenie, t.j. "lit=yes/no").
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-24 19:48:09+00:00): Не сокращайте названия.

https://osm.wiki/RU:Названия#Сокращения_и_аббревиатуры_(не_используйте_их)
silversurfer83 (2026-07-26 19:59:09+00:00): Schon wieder ich :)

du machst öfter aus einem building=* ein Multipolygon. Das wird gerne bei komplexeren Gebäuden mit Innenhöfen oder so gemacht. Das hier sieht eher nach einem Fall für building:part=* aus. Schau dir das mal an.

Und der Garten (mal von dir erfasst) sollte noch ein access=private erhalten.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186164077
f_gonella (2026-07-22 08:51:36+00:00): Apologies for including by mistake in this changeset node 40114698
f_gonella (2026-07-22 09:09:49+00:00): Node 40114698 reverted in changeset 186165811
ICT_maps (2026-07-22 15:48:03+00:00): Heads up that you deleted the entire building... which isn't the right way to handle it.
AndreiTsimafeyeu (2026-07-23 18:15:27+00:00): Hello, ICT_maps! Thanks for the heads up! My intention was to fix the tagging: I noticed the building tag was incorrectly applied to the entire school grounds polygon. I removed the tag from the territory, but you are absolutely right — I should have mapped the actual school building separately afterwards.

Thank you for adding the building properly! Have a nice day and happy mapping!
AndreiTsimafeyeu
eggie (2026-07-22 09:26:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-22 09:29:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
(* Comment..Voetpad loopt niet over particuliere grond.

Je hebt het pad verwijderd. Klopt dat? 

Komt het pad met de trap weer terug? 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-22 09:32:26+00:00): Huidige situatie
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.84430,5.391956,19/?datastrip=20260711_SVNEO-01&sensorname=SuperView-NEO
Bert-Jan Oude Nijhuis (2026-07-22 11:14:12+00:00): Het pad loopt nu over partculiere grond, dit is onjuist. We krijgen klachten van de bewoners dat mensen nu door hun tuin geen lopen omdat de kaart dit aangeeft. De trap zal wel mogen blijven maar heeft verder geen functie als voetpad.
eggie (2026-07-22 11:20:15+00:00): Duidelijk. 

Bedankt voor je reactie,
eggie
silversurfer83 (2026-07-26 19:56:30+00:00): Hi :)

kleine Anmerkung:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204323134

Mach da bitte alle addr:*=* wieder weg. Eine Garage bekommt bei uns idR keine Adresse dieser Art. Du kannst wegen mir entweder eine description=* oder ggf. ein object:*=* mit den zugehörigen Daten dran machen. 

Bei Fragen immer raus damit

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186165854
fr9leinfl8schig (2026-07-27 11:21:10+00:00): alles klar, mache ich. Danke für die Hinweise :)
silversurfer83 (2026-07-22 19:25:32+00:00): Hi there,

several of these POI look like they are your personal bookmarks and not actual POI intended for the larger public. Take https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14038869501 for example.

Also, several of the names don't look like they follow the guidelines you find at name=*

looking forward to your reply

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186166172
Ruslan Fatih (2026-07-22 14:43:34+00:00): Не надо писать номера домов в name
StC (2026-07-22 11:27:01+00:00): Bonjour,

pour info ce changeset a brisé en partie la continuité de deux itinéraires pédestres qui passent par là, en modifiant l'odre des membres de leurs relations. iD sait éviter ce problème, mais il faut s'assurer que les relations sont entièrement chargées en mémoire (en cliquant sur l'icône de chargement quand elle est présente) avant de faire les modifications.
StC (2026-07-22 11:27:17+00:00): J'oubliais : je me suis chargé de la réparation
chirping broom (2026-07-22 11:44:34+00:00): Bonjour, il y a quelque chose que je dois mal faire. J'ai du mal à comprendre où est cet icône de chargement (je ne me rappelle pas avoir vu un tel icône). Est-ce qu'il existe un support qui explique ce que vous essayez de me dire ? Dans le Wiki, sur Youtube, ailleurs ? Je ne vois pas bien de quoi il s'agit.
Je sais que les relations sont en bas à gauche sur les sentiers de randonnée, et comportent des mentions "itinéraire de randonnée". Je m'efforce au maximum si je détruis un chemin de replacer cette relation sur le chemin le plus proche, j'ai un peu du mal à voir par contre ces histoires de chargement et d'icone.
StC (2026-07-22 14:36:08+00:00): L'icône est à gauche de la poubelle, sur les relations qui ne sont pas encore chargées complètement.
chirping broom (2026-07-22 14:39:27+00:00): D'accord, merci
RathcooleRambler (2026-07-22 13:01:45+00:00): Please stop making edit comments like this, it's unhelpful and rude to fellow editors. The purpose of that field is to explain what you did, in this case "Added apartment and information to Clonmore House", for instance. You also have dragged nodes without realising it and created geometry errors in the past so please be more careful about that.
eggie (2026-07-22 09:56:46+00:00): Marco.. Tip...  Beter acces=private gebruiken.
MVG
eggie
Marco_030 (2026-07-22 10:40:07+00:00): Dank je!
eggie (2026-07-22 09:59:13+00:00): Dag Ryan,

Het is helaas niet correct om adressen toe te voegen aan de gebouwomtrek.

MVG
eggie
Marvk (2026-07-22 22:02:47+00:00): Hallo Choisir09,

es wäre super, wenn du deine changesets mit einem kurzen Kommentar versiehst, unter anderem, damit du es anderen Mappern leichter machst, zu verstehen, was du warum geändert hast.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments#Warum_sollte_ich_%C3%84nderungssatz-Kommentare_nutzen?

Beste Grüße
Marv
eggie (2026-07-22 11:10:09+00:00): Dag Marco,   Een hek kan nooit op een kruispunt staan. Ik heb het verplaatst meer naar de Brandweerkazerne.

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2026-07-22 11:18:31+00:00): Wellicht heb je hier iets aan. 
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.12721,5.194865,19/?datastrip=20260714_SVNEO-02&sensorname=SuperView-NEO

Mapse,
eggie
Marco_030 (2026-07-22 12:02:40+00:00): Ha Eggie, dank je. Hek was niet de bedoeling, wel aansluiting op de Leyenseweg.

Klopt overigens wel dat links en rechts van de brandweerkazerne een hek is geplaatst.

Jouw satellietbeeld is beter. Komt overeen met de nieuwe situatie. Als die ook op OSM staat dan is het makkelijker om de weg goed aan te passen.

Duidelijk dat ik nog niet veel ervaring met bewerken van OSM heb. Weet wel OSM te waarderen dus wilde ook mijn steentje bijdragen.

Groeten, Marco
eggie (2026-07-22 12:12:02+00:00): 👍
wolfbert (2026-07-22 10:27:29+00:00): Vielleicht, vielleicht auch nicht. Wäre bei der Gemeinde zu korrigieren.

https://gis.stmk.gv.at/atlas2/Lageplan.asp?code=5883541&typ=ort
Freeli (2026-07-22 15:48:03+00:00): Es ist mein Haus, daher kenne ich die Hausnummer. Leider ist die Nummerierung der Häuser am Weg sehr unregelmäßig.
wolfbert (2026-07-22 19:30:14+00:00): Mag sein, aber die Referenz ist das Adressverzeichnis des BEV, das auch von Ämtern und Behörden verwendet wird. Unsere Hausnummer war auch falsch erfasst und es dauerte einige Monate, aber die Gemeinde hat es dann berichtigt.