piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-27 14:22:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zawierać przedrostka. Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zaczynać się od 'ul.', 'ulica' itp. Należy usunąć przedrostek i pozostawić samą nazwę ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12704735603

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

Zasady nazewnictwa ulic w polsce:
https://wiki.osm.org/Pl:Znakowanie_dróg_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-27 14:22:40+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zawierać przedrostka. Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zaczynać się od 'ul.', 'ulica' itp. Należy usunąć przedrostek i pozostawić samą nazwę ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12704735802

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

Zasady nazewnictwa ulic w polsce:
https://wiki.osm.org/Pl:Znakowanie_dróg_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2025-03-27 13:09:52+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
NeisReview (2025-04-06 17:46:45+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164602781
Gonéo (2025-03-27 14:27:46+00:00): Review asked : your contribution seems correct.
cuzi (2025-05-05 16:45:47+00:00): Hi, just wanted to let you know, that you added this way with a typo in the access field:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1372044996

And these two with foot=2 which I assume is accidently added:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1372044993
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1372044995
Max1234-ITA (2025-05-05 20:48:53+00:00): Hi there!
Yes, you're right, most probably I've issued some iD command without noticing that I was still typing in the TextBox controls.

'prq' --> 'private' partially overwritten by 'q' (Orthogonalize command in iD)

'2' and '22' --> valued inserted by '2' (iD shortcut for 'add a new way)

Those typos are now fixed. Thanks for reporting!
Max
cuzi (2025-05-07 13:07:37+00:00): Thanks for the explanation. I was looking for the errors with "q"-Orthogonalize, that's how I found this changeset.

Now, I also looked for more of these mistakes with "2" in your area, and I have removed them:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165938064
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165938176

If you want to look for yourself in the future, I have used this query:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/23GM
Max1234-ITA (2025-05-07 15:18:26+00:00): Thanks a lot for the hint! I'll save that for later use :-)

Happy mapping!
Max1234-ITA (2025-05-09 13:25:05+00:00): Just a little thought.
the most used iD commands, along with "q" and "2", are "1" ("add node"), "3" ("Add closed way", AKA Area), and "s" (straighten).

I guess those values also might be worthy of a check :-)
cuzi (2025-05-21 20:43:58+00:00): Thanks, I added them to my list. 
I only use "q" myself, but maybe I'll remember to also use them in iD now 😊
eggie (2025-03-27 15:27:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Wanneer je denkt dat het slecht fietsen hier is dan is bad oke. 
Maar alles is relatief. Op een fietskaart als de OFM zie je hier dan een waarschuwingsbord. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
user_5359 (2025-03-28 15:18:13+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1372046406. What is the mean of the tag aE = parking_position?
aTarom (2025-03-27 15:50:34+00:00): Hola, para el pico
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12704784082/history
el valor de ele
936
sale de otra fuente que no es IGN (961m)?
Saludos
jpsa2023 (2025-03-27 17:08:46+00:00): Hola, corregido el dato. Son 961 m según el IGN.
Saludos.
NeisBot (2025-03-27 13:40:35+00:00): Hi NTMountainRanger, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 2 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=164164848
user_22680928 (2025-03-27 13:44:07+00:00): These are intentional changes
woodpeck (2025-03-27 13:53:30+00:00): Hi there, in OSM we do not delete informal trails, instead we mark them approriately. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F for further information. DWG Ticket#2025032710000549
user_22680928 (2025-03-27 13:56:56+00:00): Thanks for coming back to me. While these trails have been in existence for some time they have only recently been marked on the map. They cross what is essentially private land
user_22680928 (2025-03-27 13:59:45+00:00): Working for the National Trust we don't want to promote responsible access to the uplands. That involves not promoting unregulated recreational activity on sensitive habitats
user_22680928 (2025-03-27 14:11:58+00:00): Having read through the linked article I would also point out that there is no on the ground trail in these areas, there are poorly defined routes through these areas of sensitive habitat which if promoted will increase the damage to the protected area. Happy to engage in further conversation on this issue.
NeisReview (2025-03-28 08:39:20+00:00): Thanks for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional.

However, your changeset and map edits have been reverted. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164165510
SomeoneElse (2025-03-28 12:02:21+00:00): @NTMountainRanger the problem with "just deleting" things like this is that it will not have the effect that you want it to have.  If someone sees a "missing path" from old imagery, they might just add it back.
Your colleagues in England and Wales have worked extensively with OSM (including at least one joint session in Clumber Park in Nottinghamshire, if I remember correctly) - perhaps it's worth chatting with them?
An example of the sort of fix that would work can be seen at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086252957/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135290950 , over Dropping Crag near Scafell Pike in the English Lake District.  "AWMapper" in that conversation is one of your English colleagues.
Best Regards,
Andy
user_22680928 (2025-03-28 12:23:26+00:00): Hi Andy, thanks for the advice. Being new to the platform I wasn't aware of the protocols or possible outworkings of actions taken to edit pathlines. It's good to know these issues have been discussed before. I'll certainly reach out to my English colleagues and see where I get. Many thanks, James
Patchi (2025-04-04 19:20:42+00:00): Bonjour planet-ski,

Comme déjà indiqué dans le groupe de modifications 164317127 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164317127) l'ajout de zones résidentielles nommées pour indiquer le nom d'une station de ski est un détournement manifeste du tag landuse=residential (voir la page wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential). Rajouter de nouvelles zones résidentielles au même endroit que des zones résidentielles déjà existantes n’est pas non plus une bonne pratique. Je vous invite une fois de plus à venir en discuter sur le forum OSM France (https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/detournement-du-tag-landuse-residential-comme-station-de-ski/32838/7) avant de faire de plus amples modifications de ce genre, ceci afin de clarifier votre besoin et évaluer les solutions possibles à votre besoin avec les contributeurs de la communauté.

Si vous êtes affiliés au site https://www.ski-planet.com, je vous invite également à lire en détails les droits d'auteurs et licence pour l'utilisation de la carte OpenStreetMap osm.org/copyright car les plans affichés sur le site https://www.ski-planet.com ne respectent pas les conditions indiquées puisqu'il n'y a aucune indication visible de type "© OpenStreetMap contributors" sur les cartes disponibles sur ce site. Vous devez également préciser clairement que les données sont disponibles sous la licence ODbL. Vous pouvez mentionner ceci avec un lien hypertexte vers https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright.

Merci d’avance,

Patchi
Patchi (2025-04-04 19:20:46+00:00): Bonjour planet-ski,

Comme déjà indiqué dans le groupe de modifications 164317127 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164317127) l'ajout de zones résidentielles nommées pour indiquer le nom d'une station de ski est un détournement manifeste du tag landuse=residential (voir la page wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential). Rajouter de nouvelles zones résidentielles au même endroit que des zones résidentielles déjà existantes n’est pas non plus une bonne pratique. Je vous invite une fois de plus à venir en discuter sur le forum OSM France (https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/detournement-du-tag-landuse-residential-comme-station-de-ski/32838/7) avant de faire de plus amples modifications de ce genre, ceci afin de clarifier votre besoin et évaluer les solutions possibles à votre besoin avec les contributeurs de la communauté.

Si vous êtes affiliés au site https://www.ski-planet.com, je vous invite également à lire en détails les droits d'auteurs et licence pour l'utilisation de la carte OpenStreetMap osm.org/copyright car les plans affichés sur le site https://www.ski-planet.com ne respectent pas les conditions indiquées puisqu'il n'y a aucune indication visible de type "© OpenStreetMap contributors" sur les cartes disponibles sur ce site. Vous devez également préciser clairement que les données sont disponibles sous la licence ODbL. Vous pouvez mentionner ceci avec un lien hypertexte vers https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright.

Merci d’avance,

Patchi
Frans S (2025-03-27 15:58:45+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.

Please take your time to map accurate. You will waste Validators time if they have to correct lots of inaccurate mappings.
Use a mouse to draw.

Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S (2025-03-27 16:01:44+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.

Please take your time to map accurate. You will waste Validators time if they have to correct lots of inaccurate mappings.
Use a mouse to draw.

Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S (2025-03-27 15:49:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.

Please take your time to map accurate. You will waste Validators time if they have to correct lots of inaccurate mappings.
Use a mouse to draw.

Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S (2025-03-27 15:57:09+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.

Please take your time to map accurate. You will waste Validators time if they have to correct lots of inaccurate mappings.
Use a mouse to draw.

Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards and keep mapping !
eggie (2025-03-27 15:30:48+00:00): Wanneer je denkt dat dit het is zou het correct  kunnen zijn.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dbricks

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-27 15:39:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
oneway=no helpt niets als een fietspad als junction=roundabout is getagd.
Om de routering goed te houden laten we dan de tag junction roundabout weg op tweerichtingrotondes. .
MVG
eggie
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-03-27 15:49:57+00:00): De G11 bebording staat gewoon een richting op. Het is dus geen oneway=no

Zie ook https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=51.567894052&lng=4.626319706&z=19

Ik heb je edits teruggedraaid. Ook oneway=yes hoort niet op een kunction=roundabout.

Wat is hier veranderd sinds 11 januari?

MVG
eggie
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-27 16:19:20+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. Waar de paden aan de landuse geplakt zaten heb ik ze losgemaakt.
Gr eggie
Flits216 (2025-03-27 19:04:49+00:00): Ahh erg bedankt voor de tips/informatie! 

De rotonde is aan een zijde tegenwoordig een tweerichtingrotonde. Ik denk dat dit echter voor 11 januari al was gebeurt. Tegelijk met deze aanpassing is er waarschuwverlichting toegevoegd voor voetgangers en fietsers. Van wat ik vind waren deze werkzaamheden echter al eind 2024 klaar.
eggie (2025-03-27 19:54:55+00:00): Oke... Ik heb junction roundabout verwijderd van de 'rotonde'  Het gaat anders niet werken. oneway=no doet niets en zal anders worden overruled door junction roundabout.
Het zal na updates van de routers deels in twee richtingen routeren.
Een echte solide oplossing is er niet als de tag 'rotonde' blijft staan.
Het is nu oke.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-27 19:57:59+00:00): Eén ding snap ik niet...Waarom is dat stukje bij de picnictafel oneway=no getagd door jou?
Wat is dan de functie en waar zou dan het fietsverkeer vandaan moeten komen? 
Is dat vanwege die picnicplaats?
Flits216 (2025-03-27 21:53:49+00:00): Hoii, dat stukje bij de picnictafel, bedoel je daar van de Roosendaalsweg tot Heistraat? 
Dit is omdat ze werkzaamheden geplanned hebben waar ze het fietspad bij de Heistraat naar één kant gaan trekken. Dit is in het voorlopig ontwerp Fri-Jado terrein goed te zien:
https://www.etten-leurmakenwesamen.nl/ruimte+voor+wonen+en+leven/werk+aan+de+weg/frijado+terrein

Hopelijk verduidelijkt dit 'm!
eggie (2025-03-28 07:21:37+00:00): Thx,  maar up to you..
'k Zag alleen dat die tagging roundabout de routering in de weg zat. 

Overigens map ik ook hier in de omgeving. Laatste actie was het nieuwe fietspad Hooglaarsestraat.

Dit zijn de mappers die actief zijn (waren) in Etten-Leur

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/oooc?zoom=14&lat=51.5706735&lon=4.6328158

Mapse
eggie
Marek-M (2025-03-27 17:01:10+00:00): Połączyłeś obszary landuse z liniami regionów (2 punkty) - tego nie powinno się robić. Wygląda to na przypadkowe działanie ale przy kolejnych edycjach zwracaj uwagę na takie detale. Rozłączyłem te obiekty w tym CS: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164173127
Lisapple (2025-05-28 11:33:53+00:00): Hi Đuro,
I guess you wanted to specify "beige" or "wheat" for building colors, instead of the vivid "yellow"?
For example, Hotel Comédie Saint-Roch (way/75274773) is certainly "wheat": https://images.bestwestern.com/bwi/brochures/93831/photos/1024/9916557.jpg
Regards.
NeisBot (2025-03-27 17:14:35+00:00): Hi Club Touristi Triestini, and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

Over the past 7 days, you've made more than 100 changesets without adding any comment.

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment
Tomio (2025-03-27 19:12:30+00:00): Robson, você já foi alertado que a sua edição não respeita as diretrizes da comunidade local (ver Wiki OSM Jaraguá do Sul) e ainda insiste em mapear como Rua um caminho que é particular, usado apenas pelos proprietários dos imóveis. A comunidade local não conhece a "RUA José Maurer". Este José Maurer era o antigo proprietário e morador, nunca foi uma "rua".
Sua edição também não respeita regras do How We Map do OSM, como Truthful e Verifiable. Reverta a sua edição. Persistindo nos dados incorretos, estes serão revertidos e o mapeador será denunciado ao DWG.
sabas88 (2025-03-28 12:25:47+00:00): Ciao,
io Via San Felice la metterei unclassified più che tertiary, in quanto non è una strada di collegamento (come Via Trossarelli per dire), Via di Pino è tertiary perché va a Pino
histrio (2025-03-27 20:01:12+00:00): Hello! Please do let lines be untagged. Your changes are introducing a lot of simple unlinked lines (without useful tags), black points and not square corners.
Please read JOSM verification reports before uploading your changes. Or consider to use more user-friendly mapping software.
Thank you!
histrio (2025-03-27 20:15:20+00:00): Also, please, do not tag just one point in a way.
eggie (2025-03-27 15:35:17+00:00): bad is dus echt slecht en niet te fietsen..

Zou dat hier allemaal het geval zijn?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness

Heavily damaged paved roads that badly need maintenance: many potholes, some of them quite deep

Een weg vol gaten dus..
Dekt je vlag de lading?

MVG
eggie
Frans S (2025-03-27 15:43:34+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. Welcome New Mapper.
A remark. Please square each rectangular building with the Q key while it is still selected.
Best regards and keep mapping
Marc_ch (2025-03-31 20:16:05+00:00): Bonjour,
merci pour ces améliorations.
cependant il y a quelques petits soucis de qualité :
- trotoir mapé en double (sidewalk=* a changer en separated)
- info existante du trotoir absente sur le footway
- cheminement piéton qui s'arrètent abrutement sans connection ce qui provoque une dégradation importante du routage piéton par ex https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=46.871517%2C7.022452%3B46.870981%2C7.021632#map=18/46.870831/7.021401
J'ai corrigé le 3ieme point, je m'attaque au 3ieme
Mais je pense que tu devrais passer en revu les 2000 cas https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/hdyc-osmi-issues?uid=84054
Salutations,
Marc
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-01 19:52:00+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116989189/history has shop = magasin_d'usine that was added in this edit
shop=magasin_d'usine ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
silversurfer83 (2025-03-27 16:47:34+00:00): Moin

warum trägst du die website doppelt ein?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164167446
Emilius123 (2025-03-27 17:24:20+00:00): Hallo silversurfer,

um, wie der Kommentar des Änderungssatzes sagt, den anonym erstellten Hinweis #4304593 zu lösen.

Nur war ich etwas sehr achtlos. Vielen Dank, dass du mich drauf aufmerksam machst. Ich korrigiere es wieder.

Grüße zurück
Emilius

PS: Funktioniert OSMCha wieder?
silversurfer83 (2025-03-27 17:53:25+00:00): Alles klar. Danke für die Rückmeldung.

Zu OSMCha: Funktioniert bei mir zumindest häufiger, als dass es nicht funktioniert. Besonders schnell war es ja noch nie.

Cheers
tastrax (2025-03-28 06:56:18+00:00): Many thanks for tidying up these old building outlines - Great work
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 17:27:31+00:00): Hello!

You used
access=YES
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/700991431/history

Have you maybe meant
access=yes
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
user_5359 (2025-03-28 14:58:42+00:00): Hello! What is mean of the tag hightway=tract. Did you mean highway=track?
Jacopo (2025-03-28 10:43:13+00:00): Ciao
Avresti una fonte per il nome dei sentieri dei Tralicci?
Grazie