piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BHSPitMonkey (2026-06-13 21:50:19+00:00): Thanks for adding bicycle=no. Looking at the history for that way from this edit, I'm not seeing the "bicycle=yes" you reported but if I understand correctly you might be saying that "bicycle=yes" was strongly implied by its absence here?
Cookie Guru (2026-06-13 22:20:12+00:00): This segment definitely had bicycle=yes
BHSPitMonkey (2026-06-13 22:39:07+00:00): This is version 1 (before your edit): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1510395777/history/1

The only "yes" tag there is oneway
ajmat (2026-05-08 09:26:19+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 182373017
nebulousCarina (2026-06-03 13:06:49+00:00): what is the source for the timezone in Prairie Creek?
Arctic gnome (2026-06-03 14:48:55+00:00): The Wikipedia article that brought it to my attention cited the Canada Flight Supplement published by Nav Canada. I don't have a copy of that, but private websites which track airports agree. It's possible the time zone only applies to the airport and not the mine, but that feels unlikely.
nebulousCarina (2026-06-03 16:13:50+00:00): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_in_Canada#Mountain_Time_Zone 
Ah okay, thank you. I couldn't find a freely available copy either.
kukuk (2026-05-27 15:02:33+00:00): This is not correct, only motor_vehicle are no longer allowed, passengers and bikes are explicit allowed.
kukuk (2026-05-27 15:03:30+00:00): Of course pedestrians...
hopet (2026-05-07 23:37:12+00:00): This is a mistake changeset - for some reason, it has created duplicate objects and I am trying to revert it. However, also the revert is creating some conflicts. Can somebody verify that it has been correctly reverted?
hopet (2026-05-08 04:12:50+00:00): This changeset is reverted by changeset 182360320 (by me).
eastender (2026-05-08 07:44:40+00:00): Hi samon53, I notice that you have tagged post boxes GL50 380P and GL51 369 with electricity=solar. Do these boxes really have solar panels on them? The vast majority of the legacy meter boxes that have become Parcel Boxes are not solar powered. If these two boxes are not solar powered then I suggest removing the tag.
samon53 (2026-05-10 21:02:27+00:00): read the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:post_box:type
this is how they should be tagged as they do in fact have solar panels.
eastender (2026-06-11 16:26:31+00:00): Thank you for the response. I am familiar with the post_box:type=* guidance. I have edited much of it, in relation to the various parcel box designs. The guidance says that the Type A and Type B boxes, that have been converted to accept parcels, have solar panels. The new large eight-sided parcel boxes (first one installed in Belfast to replace a Type K box in April) also have solar panels. The traditional meter boxes, that have transitioned to become parcel boxes, do not have solar panels. I think we should add a fixme to the boxes in question to try to get another mapper to survey them and confirm whether or not they have solar panels.
samon53 (2026-06-21 00:55:17+00:00): I have personally surveyed the boxes myself and observed that they had solar panels and had been changed to accept parcels, that's why I updated the tags.
eastender (2026-06-21 19:03:28+00:00): Thank you for the confirmation, It sounds like we might have a variant of this design, because it is highly unusual for this design of Parcel Postbox to have a solar panel. According to the images of the boxes that I have found, they have been Parcel Postboxes for 4-5 years, and they haven’t had solar panels on them for most of that time. As you have actually seen the solar panels then they must have been installed recently. I wonder what the solar panels are powering. Did you notice whether there has been a barcode scanner installed as well? That would be a reason for the solar panels to be installed. Any further information you can obtain about the powered characteristics of these boxes would be useful, so that we can improve the wiki information on the tagging of these boxes.
samon53 (2026-07-23 01:49:30+00:00): I've now taken pictures of one of them and uploaded them to wikimedia so they can be used. Here are the URLs
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandy_Lane_Cheltenham_Parcel_Postbox_1.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandy_Lane_Cheltenham_Parcel_Postbox_2.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandy_Lane_Cheltenham_Parcel_Postbox_3.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandy_Lane_Cheltenham_Parcel_Postbox_4.jpg
samon53 (2026-07-23 01:51:19+00:00): It does appear to have a QR scanner which I imagine must be what the panels are there to power.
silversurfer83 (2026-05-08 18:49:47+00:00): HI there :)

please use better changeset comments. This helps us all :)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182359753
MappingMore (2026-05-10 10:11:21+00:00): Revert of 182357419
hopet (2026-05-07 23:39:24+00:00): Can somebody please verify if this changeset correctly removes the bogus created by my own changeset 182359628?
pwbriggs (2026-05-08 04:55:23+00:00): You edit looks good. Thanks for the contributions.
Glassman (2026-05-09 01:49:22+00:00): #TIP: we often leave addresses since they can be reused.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182360622
b-jazz (2026-05-09 03:53:21+00:00): RE: http://osm.org/way/1510408359

When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. If you could go back and clean up where you've made this mistake, that would be helpful. But more importantly, if you could stop from doing this in the future, it would be greatly appreciated. Please read the wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out.
lbilldt (2026-05-09 15:03:41+00:00): B-Jazz, thank you for the tips on mapping courses. I'm new to this and I am just trying to follow other courses that are mapped as an example. Thanks for sharing the wiki page. I'll read up to make sure i'm doing this properly. I do see that you can create fairways around greens in the situation where there's a fringe. Here's the quote from the wiki, "If there is a clear "fringe" around the green, the fairway should extend around the green and be combined with the green into a multipolygon". 

I'll go back through anything I've added and check for mistakes. Thanks again.
b-jazz (2026-05-09 15:37:40+00:00): Hey lbilldt, thanks for being receptive to learning new things about golf mapping. It is much appreciated by the community. For this particular change, yes, the fairway around the green was done 100% correctly. The problem I was pointing out was the bunker that extended over/into the fairway.
If you ever have questions, I'm always happy to help.
DerekAU (2026-05-13 06:04:51+00:00): This change undoes legitimate edits from local knowledge (at least at McCaffrey Drive / Lookout Road) which are not captured on the latest satellite imagery.
Legras_TT (2026-05-13 06:14:31+00:00): Hi, thanks for bringing this to my attention. My bad regarding the McCaffrey Dr/Lookout Rd intersection, I have GPS traces from the previous week that I can use to fix this - will do that now.
Legras_TT (2026-05-13 06:43:26+00:00): Hi, the geometry is fixed in changeset/182584807 and I'll review the turn restrictions etc now. There may be some broken bus routes also but they should be fairly straightforward to fix.
Legras_TT (2026-05-13 06:53:24+00:00): Further to the above I have re-added traffic signals and turn restrictions in changeset/182585204.
DerekAU (2026-05-14 00:15:49+00:00): Thank you very much!
stosh77 (2026-05-13 03:53:52+00:00): I have corrected the details.
stosh77 (2026-05-13 03:47:22+00:00): I have corrected the details.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-08 01:51:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1212366598

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Piotr Strębski (2026-05-10 21:02:52+00:00): Poprawione!
SekeRob (2026-05-08 16:16:10+00:00): Hi Kartibu

You may be fixing the numbers by adding the intl prefixes, but why not the little extra to distinct what type of number as in an other edit a cell number had the mobile tag and another contact:mobile. It's common practice to only put fixed line numbers with the contact:phone tag i.e. cell have no zero prefix so go to mobile. And then there's also the separate tag for toll free numbers i.e. phone:IT= which do not require the country prefix. Anyway those with the JOSM editor and phone plugin get automatically warned if the format is not correct/incomplete and spaces it proper for you on the go with the 'fix' button.

Happy mapping.
SekeRob
evgenykatyshev (2026-06-19 14:26:20+00:00): Hello! Tag address:place in Georgia should match Georgian name of the settlement. Village name in English isn't needed at all (but if you want to add it, it also should match the English name of settlement). Please fix it
evgenykatyshev (2026-06-19 14:32:05+00:00): Could you also share what source of the address you used?
kosmgeolan (2026-06-30 07:27:24+00:00): Здравствуйте. Я исправила как Вы хотели, но не вижу там ошибки.  Название населенного пункта было на разных языках. Я выбрала грузинское)). Теперь по русски. Какая разница?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-02 08:29:39+00:00): Reverted SEO spam adding POI possibly sourced from Google Maps per tags and apparent vandalism, with blatantly promotional and nonsensical tagging, in changeset 183534285

https://osm.org/changeset/183534285
TrickyFoxy (2026-05-12 22:18:01+00:00): 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении
Udarian (2026-05-08 18:05:37+00:00): looking at the apparent location of the new position of this ALPR, the new position seems highly unlikely as on various aerial imagery in iD it is within the road area in such a way that this new position is highly unlikely. Please double check its position and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
FindingElsewhere (2026-05-08 22:13:18+00:00): I mapped that while walking and it was giving me problems, I’m more accurately marked it now.
FajrAl (2026-05-29 02:16:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1510431639 berada di atas kolam dan saya tidak melihat bangunan apa pun di Citra Esri.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1510431639 is above the pond and I see no building here on Esri Imagery.
adigis (2026-05-29 02:56:18+00:00): Ada pak, coba check imagery bing. Kalo pengen lebih jelas bisa lihat di google imagery.
FajrAl (2026-05-29 03:10:35+00:00): Jika itu rumah panggung. Bisa pakai building=stilt_house.
adigis (2026-05-29 12:24:53+00:00): done, thank pak. koreksinya
mavl (2026-05-08 05:45:35+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок зачем-то удалил линию памятника. Эту линию можно было просто продлить, сдвинуть, и замкнуть саму на себя, превратив в замкнутую область.  
Смысла удалять и перерисовывать нет.  
Также вы удалили точку этого памятника.  
  
"Если что-то следует исправить, то это нужно именно исправлять, а не удалять и рисовать заново, так как история правок объекта бывает важна для различных целей"  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Хороший_стиль
pesec (2026-05-12 04:48:46+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Как превратить линию в полигон я не знаю, поэтому перерисовал.
Удалил точку, потому что: "Один объект на местности — один объект в OSM" по той же ссылке
mavl (2026-05-12 15:00:09+00:00): Если один объект на местности уже есть, то нет большого смысла его удалять и добавлять вместо него другой. Это игра без конца. Любой человек может перерисовывать объекты, при этом карта останётся примерно такой же, но будут теряться идентификаторы объектов (количество которых небесконечно) и будет разбухать история объектов.
flohoff (2026-05-08 14:24:27+00:00): Nur weil ich es zufällig gesehen habe. Wieso löscht du hier Addressen?

Diese Addressen sind offiziell zugeteilte.
flohoff (2026-05-08 14:26:21+00:00): Geh auf basemap.de uns such nach

"In den Wiesen 1, Marienmünster" 

Es wäre schön wenn du nicht Adressen willkürlich löscht.
user_591508 (2026-05-08 14:49:20+00:00): Auf Basemap wimmelt es nur so von Fehlern.
flohoff (2026-05-08 16:54:03+00:00): Du möchtest mir also sagen das dein Bauchgefühl genauer ist als das was die öffentliche Verwaltung/Vermessung auf basemap.de veröffentlicht?
user_591508 (2026-05-08 17:13:32+00:00): Wo bitte soll auf Basemap die Adresse sein? Und schau Dir verdammt nochmal die Fotos an. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/nebenstrasse-highway-unclassified-oder-feldweg-highway-track/143425/105
pwbriggs (2026-05-08 04:52:04+00:00): You marked that the source of this information is aerial imagery  — but that can't be correct as it's the building name/number that you added. Please make sure you accurately describe what your edits are based on (local knowledge? Some other source that is legal for use in OpenStreetMap?)

Thanks.
LordGarySugar (2026-05-27 23:22:35+00:00): As this railway no longer exists, it should not be mapped in OSM. OHM is the best place for historic railways.
bigmanbusman (2026-05-25 11:47:57+00:00): can i have the source for the information about the tseng tau - sham chung ferry
Kovoschiz (2026-05-08 08:06:13+00:00): Currently `=informal` is recommended to be used without `highway=crossing` and `footway=crossing` https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing=informal
Lenonn84 (2026-05-18 18:06:39+00:00): just wondering, what did you get the addresses from?
tguen (2026-05-19 20:58:17+00:00): These are from Clark County, also available in the National Address Database

https://hub-clarkcountywa.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/situs-addresses/explore

https://www.transportation.gov/gis/national-address-database
Lenonn84 (2026-05-20 22:25:09+00:00): Alright, thanks for the info!
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-08 09:31:47+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zawierać przedrostka. Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zaczynać się od 'ul.', 'ulica' itp. Należy usunąć przedrostek i pozostawić samą nazwę ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13807713201

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

Zasady nazewnictwa ulic w polsce:
https://wiki.osm.org/Pl:Znakowanie_dróg_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
VA00 (2026-05-14 15:53:28+00:00): A nie duplikat fragmentu tej: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322755217 ?
sorier (2026-06-04 06:32:35+00:00): To nie duplikat tylko inna droga (ścieżka). Poprawiłem (usunąłem) nieistniejacą drogę.
silversurfer83 (2026-05-08 18:46:23+00:00): Moin,

warum hast du die Fläche der FF komplett gelöscht? Auf den ersten Blick sieht es auf dem Luftbild so aus, als würde die FF das gesamte Gelände nutzen.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182368009
user0944 (2026-05-08 20:28:22+00:00): Aloha!

Thank you so much for helping to map the Nuuanu area! I have been mapping this area for some time now, so I really appreciate it - especially as this seems to be a senior capstone project.

With that being said, I have noticed some things that could be improved. While I really appreciate the level of detail of your mapping, I noticed that you are marking the buildings as "Building (letter) - (name of building)". Per OSM conventions, would it be possible to use the "ref" tag for the reference letter of buildings (eg. instead of "name=B Building - Shiraki Building", put "name=Shiraki Building" and "ref=B". Additionally, I believe campus branches should use the tag "branch=*". I understand that you're a new mapper and these conventions are not on the OSM Wiki; Even so, I would highly recommend using them.

If you have any questions, please reach out!   We have a OSM Discord server and a Slack for discussions, if you're not there already. From one high schooler to another, thank you so much for your hard work and dedication. I hope your capstone project is doing well!

Mahalo,
user0944
Ltrlg (2026-05-08 07:13:46+00:00): source = Orthophotos IGN (2025)
FajrAl (2026-07-02 02:45:05+00:00): look like there is no bank here
TuAmigoElEditor (2026-07-19 15:42:56+00:00): There is absolutely no bank here twin
IngoWo (2026-05-19 08:52:56+00:00): Hallo,
die Niederweserbahn ist seit mehr als 60 Jahren stillgelegt, und vor Ort sind keine Spuren mehr zu erkennen (von sehr, sehr wenigen Ausnahmen abgesehen. Ich kenne eigentlich nur die Überreste der Brücke über die Rohr).

Es ist allgemeiner Konsens der großen Mehrheit der Community, dass historische Objekte, von denen keine Spur mehr vorhanden ist, nicht in die Openstreetmap-Datenbank gehören. Siehe zahlreiche Diskussionen im Forum und auf Mailinglisten mit hunderten von Posts und das Wiki. Ich vermute mal, du kennst diese Diskussionen, da du auch schon lange im Projekt zu sein scheinst. Das gilt insbesondere für historische Bahnstrecken. Es gibt hier mit OpenHistoricalMap auch eine hervorragende Alternative, in der das Eintragen ausdrücklich gewünscht ist, und wo du dich austoben kannst.

Ich hatte vor einiger Zeit alle Abschnitte gelöscht, bei denen definitiv nicht mehr die geringsten Überreste vorhanden sind. Das betraf zum Beispiel Abschnitte, auf denen sich heute ein durchgehender Acker befindet, bei dem die Treckerspuren quer über die angebliche Trasse führen. Es gibt an den meisten Stellen auch keinen Bahndamm, weil die Strecke ebenerdig verlief.

Das ist dann auch kein railway=abandoned, sondern wäre railway=razed, wo aber ein Konsens besteht, dass man das nicht eintragen soll.

Ich würde daher vorschlagen, deine Änderungen wieder rückgängig zu machen.
IngoWo (2026-05-24 08:28:35+00:00): Keine Antwort... Ich habe es wieder rückgängig gemacht.
mavl (2026-06-07 06:01:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183764451, 183764460, 183764431, 183764453, 183764448, 183764459, 183764455 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20768].
Benoît C MdP (2026-05-20 14:31:11+00:00): Bonjour Shohreh

Pour y être passé il y a une heure, il n'y a pas de bande cyclable sur cette section de la voie. J'ai corrigé.

Bonne continuation

Benoît
Shohreh (2026-05-20 15:28:55+00:00): Il y a un morceau devant Nestlé, après une succession de logos :

https://gofile.io/d/cDN046
Benoît C MdP (2026-05-20 15:45:13+00:00): Tout à fait. C'est exactement ce qui était dans osm depuis quelques années. La bande n'existe plus à partir du n°28 environ. C'est un simple DSC
Shohreh (2026-05-20 19:29:02+00:00): My bad
maxwellward (2026-05-30 02:21:26+00:00): Hello! Thanks for your contribution. When working on houses, it's best to use the Q key to square them off so they better reflect the reality on the ground. This helps eliminate the small crookedness that comes with free-drawing building outlines.
LordGarySugar (2026-05-09 18:26:05+00:00): Hi, I have removed the no-u turns added along the main road here in Halle - they are not needed to prevent u-turns back onto the same way. They are only needed when the 'from' and 'to' way are different, for example with this relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14355204
Kamerijker (2026-05-09 19:00:37+00:00): Ok thanks, I only tried this because many routers seem to ignore this restriction and propose U turns in the middle of a highway on some routes. Next time I will systematically report a bug if they do.
LordGarySugar (2026-05-10 00:50:37+00:00): Yes, that's the best solution. Routers shouldn't be suggesting such u-turns anyway 👍
I found these turn restrictions because someone was trying to route from the N6 travelling south going to Meiboom, which was displaying some strange directions.
MKnight (2026-05-08 08:53:58+00:00): Was soll das?

ich habe diese Änderungen rückgängig gemacht.
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-08 09:34:20+00:00): Hallo vinc98, willkommen bei OSM.

Hier mit diesem Changeset wurden sehr viele Bus-Relationen gelöscht, übersehe ich etwas oder war dies ein Versehen?

Danke und Grüße
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-08 09:35:33+00:00): @MKnight ah, danke! Sorry, hatte deinen Kommentar nicht gesehen oder eher übersehen.

Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182371973
vinc98 (2026-05-08 10:56:07+00:00): Moin zusammen, vielen Dank für die Anmerkung, aber ich weiß ehrlicherweise nicht, was passiert sein soll. Was ich lediglich hinzufügen wollte und dies geklappt hat, waren Bäume im Schlossgarten, die eine festgelegte Baumnummer haben. Wurden dadurch vielleicht andere Daten mit derselben Kennung überschrieben?
Ich habe nichts aktiv löschen wollen, nur hinzufügen. 
MfG
Vincent Minge
MKnight (2026-05-08 15:39:46+00:00): Wenn Du in JOSM etwas hochlädst und im Hochladefenster links zu löschende Objekte siehst, obwohl Du nix löschen wolltest, dann ist etwas falsch. 

Die Bäume hab ich beim Aufräumen  übersehen und nun wieder hochgeladen.
cyclist789 (2026-07-03 12:31:33+00:00): Jeg har rettet stenens placering.

(Den skulle nok have haft en fixme=* i stedet for en note=*.)
Niels GM (2026-07-03 13:04:31+00:00): Jeg havde allerede GPS koordinater, så positionen skulle bare kontrolleres en ekstra gang -- derfor note.
Tak for det og god weekend.
cyclist789 (2026-07-03 14:34:36+00:00): (Stenen er muligvis blevet flyttet nogle metre i de seneste år. Den står nu med buskads op ad siderne, der hvor jeg har sat den. Dens side på ambirk.eu havde også en lidt anden position end dens gamle (v3) placering på OSM.)
Niels GM (2026-07-04 20:55:24+00:00): Jeg ser den nu; det er meget fint, tak!
MassCartog (2026-05-08 13:36:19+00:00): Hi could you explain what you mean by Duplicate? Looks like you removed a building that exists, it has been demolished?
eggie (2026-05-08 09:43:48+00:00): Dag Jancini,
De straatnaam... spelling klopte al niet.. heb ik verwijderd. Die correspondeerde ook niet met de BAG adresnodes. 

MVG
eggie
MassCartog (2026-05-08 13:36:14+00:00): Hi could you explain what you mean by Duplicate? Looks like you removed a building that exists, it has been demolished?
eggie (2026-05-08 09:40:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-05-08 09:47:07+00:00): Voorlopig fitness toegevoegd. Alleen een naam doet niets in OSM.
ClaveScottPH (2026-05-08 13:41:53+00:00): Needs update: Tabangohay (in Alangalang) and Barayong (in Palo) are part of the Tacloban boundary.
ClaveScottPH (2026-05-09 03:36:04+00:00): *Not part
mavl (2026-06-07 06:02:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183764451, 183764460, 183764431, 183764453, 183764448, 183764459, 183764455 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20768].
EditTimisoara (2026-05-08 09:21:05+00:00): surface=sett: The stones are not entirely flat and typically do not cover the surface completely, unlike surface=paving_stones
felipeeugenio (2026-05-08 23:46:42+00:00): Hello. Amenity=animal shelter? I don´t think so. Maybe a landuse= https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Danimal_keeping.

That garden is very suspicious too. wht is really there?

and please don´t use descriptive names (corral)

Layer= in a house is incorrect. maybe building_levels=?

are you there? are you mapping on terrain? 
regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182373117
BholeKiBhasam (2026-05-09 05:07:04+00:00): Buenos días, señor. He actualizado el mapa. Que tenga un excelente fin de semana.