piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Enock4seth (2024-11-19 21:14:29+00:00): Hi Sam, can you take a look Duaboni 1 from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1335766401 to confirm https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2164260850
Sammyhawkrad (2024-11-20 09:31:39+00:00): Duaboni 1 seems to be the right location. Verifying from my sources the label could be pointing to one of the two locations.
_Mathieu_ (2024-10-01 17:56:10+00:00): Bonjour, sûr qu'il y a une telle interdiction aussi large ? Sur la plupart de ces voies il n'y a pas de panneau d'interdiction, ou tout au plus un panneau hazmat:E seulement.
didier2020 (2024-10-01 18:39:30+00:00): bonjour,
c'est reelement cela
http://overpass-turbo.eu/map.html?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%5Btimeout%3A25%5D%3B%0Aarea%28id%3A3600008649%29-%3E.searchArea%3B%0Anwr%5B%22hazmat%3AE%22%3D%22no%22%5D%28area.searchArea%29%3B%0Aout+geom%3B
_Mathieu_ (2024-10-01 19:08:00+00:00): Je vois bien le résultat de vos modifications, mais où ces restrictions sont-elles réellement visibles ? Sur la plupart de ces voies il n'y a pas de panneau d'interdiction, ou tout au plus un panneau hazmat:E seulement.
didier2020 (2024-10-02 12:06:18+00:00): tous ces itinéraires sont liés aux tunnels interdits aux tmd, s'il manque un panneau, préciser le moi, je demanderais a l'ager (responsable de la voierie ) ou SCA d'y remédier.
Supaplex (2024-04-04 18:30:30+00:00): 花蓮一帶
tekim (2024-04-06 17:01:44+00:00): Hello, Thanks for your edits to the map!  I see you cited "earth.google.com" as one of your sources.  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Earth when editing OpenStreetMap due to Google's Terms of Use
tekim (2024-04-06 17:02:00+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149664019
santamariense (2024-04-07 18:58:47+00:00): Olá joao5755,

Bem-vindo ao OSM. Ao desenhar prédios/casas, procure deixar as geometrias delas no esquadro. Para isso, seleciona o prédio e tecla Q.

Bons mapeamentos!
DressyPear4 (2024-04-04 21:51:48+00:00): Olá, as tags devem ser adicionadas em inglês.
Considere colocas apenas as iniciais em maiúsculo nos nomes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149584272
mcliquid (2024-04-08 12:26:52+00:00): Hi, steht auf dem 50er Schild wirklich "Vaduz" drauf oder meinst du damit das Ortsschild? (traffic_sign=city_limit)
jeka p (2024-04-12 18:53:53+00:00): Hi!
Hier steht beides...: 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=47.132652000000036&lng=9.51322233606561&z=17.85579854086657&pKey=771181331489512&focus=photo
santamariense (2024-04-07 18:52:31+00:00): Olá Super Paradise,

Bem-vindo ao OSM. Vou te passar umas padronizações e dicas de melhorias.

- No OSM, os nomes devem estar no padrão inicial em maiúsculo, seguido de letras em minúsculo. Ex: Lanchonete Bom Paladar
- Para deixar uma geometria de um prédio/casa no esquadro, seleciona ela e tecla Q. 

Bons mapeamentos!
oba510 (2024-04-05 07:44:56+00:00): Hi, just a heads up: it looks like some bus route relations got broken here near the Martinez Amtrak station.
kahrens (2024-04-06 17:08:22+00:00): Oh thank you! I will look to fix these.
Nordpfeil (2024-04-05 11:37:50+00:00): You tagged around Prossenberg 5 tracks with "obstscale=vegetation". I have never seen a tag like this before and I have no idea what it means. Could you check it. Regards Peter
Pirolina (2024-04-05 13:19:20+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe es geändert.
mavl (2024-11-13 07:58:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159079753 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
woodpeck (2024-04-14 11:40:09+00:00): Hello Jean-Sébastien, it would be great if you could amend your changeset comments by explaining more about the "fix" and what sources you are using to "fix" things.
JS Bédard (2024-04-15 12:22:37+00:00): Changes are done on logging roads based on Quebec Government Imagery from 2023, taken on this site https://www.foretouverte.gouv.qc.ca
marczoutendijk_repair (2024-04-05 08:54:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149603227 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
Mr Satterly (2024-04-05 01:00:27+00:00): Surprisingly, this is not an active pumpjack. It is a museum exhibit of old energy production equipment. There are a couple pictures of some of the equipment at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Museums_in_Gillette,_Wyoming
muralito (2024-04-04 20:33:16+00:00): Hi. Bing Aerial Imagery is a bad choice to adjust roads in Uruguay, as they are offset by several meters. They are much better quality imagery like the ones from IDE.uy or montevideo.gub.uy  (available in openaerialmap.org)
InsertUser (2024-04-04 19:48:22+00:00): Also added service road and reconnected a footway.
marc__marc (2024-08-27 22:22:33+00:00): Hello,
thanks a lot for the improvement
but you also create a lot of duplicate, for ex https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11787822615 duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6148708582
Can you fix it ?
it 'll also be nice to fill the source when you upload your improvement (for ex source=aerial imagery in the popup windows when uploading)
Regards,
Marc
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-04-05 13:28:47+00:00): Please stop adding coastlines you are making overlaps and doubling existing coastlines. I will revert this changeset and all others with the same issue .
Andromeda64 (2024-04-05 21:49:30+00:00): Hi - I'm just trying to make better coastline in JOSM for Xplane so it looks better - as it stands now it's not good - flying over Greece a lot. I must have posted by mistake. I just save this on my computer normally. Isn't it good to make the coastline more precise or?
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-04-06 04:42:27+00:00): It is OK to realign them, but you have created double coastlines with lot of overlaps. Just realign existing geometries and be carefull not to break any relations that migh have coastline as a member, usualy these are administrative ones.
Andromeda64 (2024-04-06 06:47:58+00:00): I probably have too little knowledge about OSM and JOSM. Trying to learn more all the time. My goal is just to make a more accurate coastline of where I/we fly in Xplane 11/12. Normally, I use the data OSM data in the Ortho4xp folder and only save on my computer all changes, and never upload to OSM. It takes many many hours to change all the islands. If more people want to download good coastlines to Ortho4xp, it's good if you can save directly online at OSM so more people can share my work, otherwise it's just me. But as I said, I don't really understand what will go wrong because there will be double coastlines and problems.
marc__marc (2024-08-27 22:29:41+00:00): Hello,
I advice to first use the online editor and add modes nodes to improved the coastline.
using josm is fine but need more learning curve. if you use josm, you must down the area before making any change and read the josm validator before the upload
Regards,
Marc
sim6 (2024-04-04 20:48:43+00:00): No turn right permited so should be only_straight_on.
Jordi MF (2024-04-04 20:55:49+00:00): Well, there is no sign that sais that, but I will map it as you say at risk to be mapping for the render. Thank you.
sim6 (2024-04-04 21:27:06+00:00): If I remember correclty, there are two lanes (mapped as two ways), one to turn right an the other to straight forward.
sim6 (2024-04-04 20:50:15+00:00): No turn right permited so should be only_straight_on.
Jordi MF (2024-04-04 20:57:53+00:00): Well, there is no sign that says that, but I have mapped it as you say at risk to be mapping for the render (I know that this will be useful for users). Thank you.
sim6 (2024-04-04 21:33:17+00:00): If I remember correctly there are two ways separated by median, one to turn right and the other to straight forward.
sim6 (2024-04-04 21:35:03+00:00): Sorry I mean a traffic island instead of median.
santamariense (2024-04-07 18:45:42+00:00): Olá Leticia Wartha,

Bem-vinda ao OSM. Procure desenhar a geometria de um prédio apenas na área construida, sem contar o pátio.

Bons mapeamentos!
delineatorix (2024-08-10 20:44:12+00:00): Hallo Bu_,
nur weil Elemente „nicht öffentlich“ zugänglich sind oder auf „Privatgelände“ liegen, bedeutet das nicht sofort, dass sie nicht gemappt werden sollten. Bitte sieh davon ab, verschiede Elemente einfach so zu löschen — insbesondere ohne entsprechende Erfahrung oder ohne Rücksprache.
Vielen Dank, delineatorix
Nakaner-repair (2024-08-12 12:01:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 155145336 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Bu_. The playgrounds were tagged as private, that is sufficient. See discussion of changeset 149586209.
gurglypipe (2024-04-04 21:07:10+00:00): Heya :) If you include the imagery offset you needed to use to get Bing to line up with the Cadastral Parcels in your changeset description, other people can then more easily use the same alignment in that area in future, which can make editing more consistent between people.

e.g. “aligned to OSMUK Cadastral Parcels (Bing offset -1,-0.42)” is what I add to my changeset descriptions

Looks like you’re tidying things up nicely!
WestWyreWanderer (2024-04-05 12:45:48+00:00): Thanks for the useful tip and complimentary comment as usual.

Your suggestion is a good idea, but I usually get carried away and generally find myself needing to tweak the offset multiple times. I think Cadastral Parcels should default to enabled because casual, new or one-off editors don't know about it and probably don't even know about the need to consider imagery alignment at all. I try to blitz a small area with as many easy to align features as accurately as possible such that future imagery misalignment is obvious at a glance and will hopefully reduce the likelihood of this problem in that area.
kwiatek_123 (2024-04-04 20:37:14+00:00): Drogi dojazdowe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1269159454 oznaczamy tagiem highway=service i service=driveway
Sylabowy Kot (2024-04-04 20:42:51+00:00): Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi. Nie mogłem jakoś odgrzebać odpowiedniego tagowania.
MxxCon (2024-04-05 04:43:51+00:00): Hello.
When mapping features that supposed to have right angles (such as buildings), after you map them, you can right-click on it and select "Make Square" (or shortcut key Q) and it'll adjust the position of corners to make them all 90°. Doing that not only makes your mapping look neater and cleaner, but also changes the feature to more closely represent real life. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149586584
Coplact (2024-04-05 13:16:05+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for the tip! Just joined OSM to start contributing. Will run some more tutorials for better comprehension.
rik_ (2024-04-05 05:49:36+00:00): Hallo,

ich denke, beim Weg [1] passt das vergebene `surface`-Tag nicht. Ich vermute, du bist davon ausgegangen, dass die parallel verlaufende Autobahn gemeint war.

Sorry für die Störung, falls meine Vermutung nicht stimmt und da jetzt tatsächlich Asphalt auf den Sand gekippt wurde.

Viele Grüße

rik


[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23087720
SteMue (2024-04-06 20:04:20+00:00): Du hast absolut Recht, ich habe mich verklickt.
FDMS4 (2026-06-07 23:49:59+00:00): Hi, what kind of bicycle rental is this? Is it run as part of the nearby hotel or open to the public?
Thierry1030 (2026-06-08 11:22:42+00:00): Hello!
The bike rental is operated by Hostel Ruthensteiner > I added in the meantime an operator and a website
FDMS4 (2026-06-08 14:51:53+00:00): Thanks! I added the bicycle_rental=shop subtag since that seems to apply to such sheds belonging to ho(s)tels.
canfe (2024-04-10 05:45:54+00:00): Ho cancellato la larghezza in quanto si deve riferire alla carreggiata e non alla rotonda che di per sé è già mappata con l'ampiezza evidente.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149586830
EneaSuper (2024-04-05 09:04:53+00:00): Ciao, come denominazione è sufficiente "Arrideli" 🙂
crys76 (2024-04-05 17:00:16+00:00): ok, grazie del commento, l'ho messo così per non confonderlo con il Trail "Arrideli" che è lì vicino
ivanbranco (2024-04-05 20:42:04+00:00): Ciao crys76,

questi nomi sono nomi utilizzati dai biker? "Mezze Penne al Burro" e "Arrideli" non sembrano proprio nomi ufficiali. In questo caso non va utilizzato il tag name=* ma il tag mtb:name=*.
crys76 (2024-04-06 07:12:51+00:00): Ciao, si la Località si chiama Arrideli ufficialmente, mentre i Trail Arrideli e Mezze Penne sono nomi conosciuti dai locals biker, provvedo a mettere il tag corretto "mtb:name", grazie
citrula (2024-04-04 23:00:28+00:00): You can press "Q" to square the corners of things you draw in iD.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149587313
ashamp (2024-04-05 12:25:18+00:00): Good to know, thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149587313
DUGA (2024-05-04 14:57:06+00:00): Is this creek intermittent?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130100830/history#map=15/41.7839/-76.0521
Messinian (2024-05-04 16:15:13+00:00): Nope. Good catch. Thanks. I must have hit that toggle button accidentally. I fixed it.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-04 21:10:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/360784514

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Plac Dionizego Mogielnickiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1269164585
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1269164586
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1269164587
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1269164589
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1269164591
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1269164592

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-08 11:02:45+00:00): Hello!

Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree".

So for buildings it is not needed to put Building as their name.

Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1269164761 is specifically named with such name?

And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
    
Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.
MxxCon (2024-04-05 05:00:11+00:00): Hello.
If these are construction sites now, perhaps all the other irrelevant tags should be removed?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149587683
canfe (2024-04-05 05:07:03+00:00): In genere è meglio disegnare i buiilding con le loro carartteristiche e poi aggiungere un singolo nodo per l'esercizio, in questo caso le Poste. Così compare pure l'iconcina delle PPTT.
Idem per l'ATM. Se possibile indicarlo a parte come singolo nodo. Stesso discorso iconcina e più parametri specifici per l'ATM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149587889
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-08 11:03:10+00:00): Hello!

Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree".

So for buildings it is not needed to put building as their name.

Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1269167680 is specifically named with such name?

And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
    
Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.
tomzyl (2024-04-05 09:22:58+00:00): dlaczego usunąłeś użytkowaną jezdnię?
szalona_entropia (2024-04-05 10:00:58+00:00): Ponieważ była oznaczona jako nieużytkowana.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-05 11:20:40+00:00): Ale jeśli jezdnia istnieje tyle że jest zamknięta czy prywatna to nie powód by ją usuwać.

Proszę, nie usuwaj rzeczy tylko dlatego bo access=no mają - a najlepiej przywróć te które skasowałeś

Czy ta edycja coś robiła poza usuwaniem nieużytkowanych dróg?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-05 11:22:50+00:00): http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=149588043 wygląda na do usunięcia w całości

tam gdzie nie ma ruchu degradacja z primary do np. service miałaby sens
amcclements (2024-04-05 12:48:08+00:00): Thanks for all this, looking good ! Loyn Bridge is much-loved locally and deserved a bit of loving in OSM :)
archpdx (2024-04-07 23:23:31+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for mapping these houses/addresses. Quick tip: you can square corners of a building by pressing 'q' when selecting it.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-04 21:47:42+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 148371199, 148371544, 148372525, 148372912, 148843773.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-06 06:57:52+00:00): Hello!

Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree".

So for buildings it is not needed to put house as their name.

Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1269172069 is specifically named with such name?

And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
    
Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2024-04-06 06:58:48+00:00): Ist das eine neue tagging-Art?
Die Richtung war doch bisher schon dran und exakter getaggt, bedenke, dass auf Vorder- und Rückseite eines Mastes Schilder sein könnten und damit am selben Knoten und direction dann nicht zuordbar wäre ...
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2024-04-06 08:16:41+00:00): Ich glaube, ich bin der "Wurzel des Übels" auf der Spur ... Das deutsche Wiki kennt nur eine Art der direction, die englische dagegen alle drei ...
george1201 (2024-04-06 21:51:46+00:00): Du hast recht. Ich verwende das deutschsprachige Wiki.
Die Vorgeschichte: Beim Editieren (mit dem iD) ist mir aufgefallen, dass am Verkehrszeichenknoten die Richtung nicht angezeigt wurde. Der iD stellt diese normalerweise mit einem Kreissektor dar. Deswegen bin ich von einem fehlerhaften Tagging ausgegangen und habe es so geändert, wie es im (deutschen) Wiki zum Key traffic_sign geschrieben steht. In der englischen Version lese ich jetzt, dass hier ein Darstellungsfehler des iD vorliegt. Die Schlüssel traffic_sign:forward=* und direction=* seien aber identisch. Somit war meine Änderung tatsächlich überflüssig. Sie nützt jetzt lediglich den iD-Nutzern, dass auch ihnen die eingetragene Richtung angezeigt wird.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-08 12:00:35+00:00): Hello!

Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree".

So for buildings it is not needed to put Building as their name.

Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1269173150 is specifically named with such name?

And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
    
Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.
Aim311_ (2024-04-05 12:43:05+00:00): To już jest wandalizm https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1269174403
Specjalnie dodajesz niesiniejącą ścieżkę, po co?
Aim311_ (2024-04-05 12:43:44+00:00): Dyskusję przenoszę na discorda.
szydzio (2024-04-05 20:17:05+00:00): Droga leśna przez środek budowy ? I bez access? Naprawdę każdemu wolno sobie tam swobodnie pospacerować ?
Famlam (2024-04-20 22:19:17+00:00): Hoi emvee, 

Ik denk dat er iets misgegaan is met https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6869980 en https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375225323

Beiden moeten denk ik source:maxspeed=NL:rural hebben?
emvee (2024-04-21 06:17:19+00:00): Zeker, gecorrigeerd, bedankt!

Ik ben al verschillende keren gered door jou OsmMapcssValidationNL/main/netherlands.validator.mapcss "gered", wel source:maxspeed=NL:zone30 maar geen maxspeed=30 etc. etc. maar deze zit er zo te zien nog niet in ;-)

Ook nog even in Osmose gekeken maar die had inderdaad nog wat dingen gevonden en die ook gecorrigeerd:

* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150287738
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150287791
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150287830
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150287842
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150287971
Famlam (2024-04-21 08:18:57+00:00): > maar deze zit er zo te zien nog niet in ;-)

Haha yes, ik was er gisterenavond aan begonnen, maar wilde even goed wakker zijn voor ik op 'commit' zou drukken. Later vandaag zit 'ie erin :)
Langlaeufer (2024-04-05 15:24:46+00:00): Hallo mralexrass, 
kleiner Hinweis siehe: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle

Parking_aisle sind untergeordnete Fahrgassen auf dem Parkplatz und nicht die Zufahrten zum Parkplatz oder zu Gebäuden oder Garagen.

Grüße Langläufer.
mralexrass (2024-04-05 17:10:05+00:00): Fixed. Danke.
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-05 10:14:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149607379 where the changeset comment is: Aufräumen nach erneuter 'geocodec'-Mappingaktion s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
GinaroZ (2024-05-13 16:46:31+00:00): Thanks for adding this, presumably the cycle path off to the side is two way rather than the one way which is currently mapped?
Kroy Krista (2024-04-04 22:33:36+00:00): www.tattoo-club.cz
cs09736 (2024-07-29 02:09:20+00:00): Hi there, I know it's been a while but just letting you know that the 'service' tag is often unsuitable for service roads like the ones tagged in this changeset. It's a bit confusing given the name, but what we commonly call service roads are better known as "access roads" since they provide access to properties off the main carriageway. The access road should be tagged according to its function, which in this case is still 'primary' since the access road still carries high volumes of through traffic and doesn't carry significantly less traffic than the inner carriageways.
Norbert Dichter (2024-04-05 19:35:21+00:00): There ist so much to fix: buildings have tag "area" and are not even squared or round. Should I clean up?

"After drawing the outline and tagging as a building, use the 'Q' key in the iD web editor to "square" the corners."

Or use the 'O' key for round buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149590221