piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Kovoschiz (2023-12-15 03:35:16+00:00): I mean if you take it to the extreme, it won't be realistic to split it based on whether construction has started on each section either. The exact flow belongs to OpenHistoricalMap.  
The project ceremony commenced at the end of last month. Temporary sites have already been handed over before.  Contract signed with contractor this week. 
Also remember OSM is not always updated frequently in applications. 
Other `proposed:*=` features are much more loose. You won't put Route 11 and Tuen Mun Bypass in the same namespace as this.
vectorial8192 (2023-12-15 11:58:40+00:00): Ah ok, tbf I was also not paying close attention to the extension. EG I did not know about the commencement ceremony.

Well, if the ceremony is done, then yes, the tags and the timing are both correct. And then there is no problem.
Langlaeufer (2023-11-13 10:19:59+00:00): Hallo ElGranSerio,
Wenn die Benutzungspflicht entfernt wurde heißt es ja nicht, dass man den Weg nicht mehr als Radweg benutzten darf. Oder ist der Weg jetzt klar nicht mehr als Radweg erkennbar (Gehwegschilder)?
Grüße
Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143731646
ElGranSerio (2023-11-20 08:36:43+00:00): Die Benutzungspflicht wurde aufgehoben, da die Lange Feldstraße (zw. Schulstraße und Grundschule am Langen Feld) als Fahrradstraße ausgewiesen wurde. Damit wurden auch die Radweg-Schilder entfernt, der Weg mit Pflaster ist geblieben aber es verbleiben nur noch die Gehweg-Schilder.
dadavid (2023-11-08 12:35:02+00:00): Hi, 
ihr habt hier building=joiner eingetragen. Im OSM Tagging-Standard wird aber unterschieden zwischen dem Gebäude und dessen Nutzung. Das Wiki-konforme Tagging wäre hier also building=yes (oder building=industrial oder building=commercial) und zusätzlich craft=joiner. Das ist tatsächlich etwas verwirrend leider, schaut gerne auch im Wiki nach, welche Tags hier am besten passen. 
Viele Grüße und weiterhin happy mapping :) 
David

wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Geb%C3%A4ude

wiki.osmorg/wiki/DE:Key:craft
damianeue (2023-11-07 10:58:16+00:00): *WORK FINISHED (for the moment, everything that was covered in my notes was added to the map)
literan (2023-11-07 19:49:45+00:00): не надо добавлять тег музыкальной школы. Вы же сами пишете, что это студия, а тег студии я проставил
Kovoschiz (2023-11-07 13:37:23+00:00): Are there any problems with using `building=bridge` for spiral ramps? They are comparable with bridges. Also I believe the intention was to match with the `=service` + `bridge=` . These are indeed bridges attached to the podium structure. 
For reference, `man_made=bridge` is for the bridge deck. Which is obviously stacked and ill-defined here.
Flamen_Sru (2023-11-09 06:31:00+00:00): Hi Kovoschiz, 
Thank you for reaching out. According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dbridge#:~:text=Draw%20the%20area%20of%20the,cross%20the%20outline%20of%20it  I have modified the tag from building=bridge to building=yes and also removed the unsupported tag i,e bridge=spiral to avoid JOSM validation error.
Kovoschiz (2023-11-09 06:54:56+00:00): As I said, `man_made=bridge` is usually for a single bridge deck, especially as it is associated with `layer=` . `building=bridge` already says it can be used for skywalks etc associated with buildings, which is comparable to the situation here.
Flamen_Sru (2023-11-17 05:42:18+00:00): Hi Kovoschiz, Thank you for providing more insight, I have retained the data to previous version and removed bridge=spiral which is unsupported tag and its creating validation error.
aTarom (2023-11-08 07:38:59+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, una duda por favor,  en el elemento
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16663105/history
el "source" viene de copiar y pegar otro elemento o lo has añadido tú?
Saludos
Etzharai (2023-11-08 11:34:53+00:00): El elemento de ese parque venía en Google Maps, pero al leer el foro de Telegram he decidido quitarlo porque, a todas luces, perece ser un troll de Google Maps. Disculpad las molestias.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143732894
CaldeiraG (2023-11-07 12:43:51+00:00): Setúbal 2910 - #import_pt_ine_2021 (submitted housenumbers on the wrong changeset)
Hufkratzer (2023-11-07 20:19:04+00:00): Hi,
compare
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Racecourse_(horse_racing)
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/856426537
pitfire (2023-11-08 06:42:23+00:00): Hallo 1998alexkane,

mit der Neueinstufung der Trasse "Weg: 907054405" von tertiary nach primary_link
kann ich mich nicht so recht anfreunden. Der Abschnitt unterliegt eindeutig
noch den Verkehrsregeln "Ost-West-Spange"und trägt auch weiterhin seinen Namen.
Die letzten 50 Meter des hw=tertiary zum hw=primary_link zu befördern,
ohne dass sich an der Straße irgrnd etwas sichtbar ändert?

@Konsens: _link als reine Abbiegespuren (meist Triangel) bekommen wegen der Verkehrsbedeutung zwingend die niedrigere Einordnung.

VG pitfire
woodpeck (2023-11-07 12:20:56+00:00): Hallo, danke für die Erfassung der Hydranten! Normalerweise benutzen wir das Tag "name" nur dann, wenn etwas einen Eigennamen hat (wenn z.B. ein berühmter Hydrant den Namen Fritz-Müller-Hydrant hätte oder so etwas). Für die hier erfassten Hydranten und Brunnen würde man eigentlich keine Namen setzen - stattdessen würde man das "ref"-Tag nutzen, um die Nummer zu erfassen. Siehe auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant
eggie (2023-11-07 13:49:16+00:00): Oke, maar surface=paved maakt iets nog geen weg.
Dan heb je een highway tag nodig Bv highway=service.
Ik pas even wat aan.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143734328

MVG
eggie
Metzor (2023-11-07 15:24:35+00:00): Hi stpoepseldiver,

Please 
 have a look at this page as you use StreetComplete:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#A_changeset_made_with_StreetComplete_covers_a_massive_area%2C_why_is_this%3F_How_can_it_be_prevented%3F

Best regards
Metzor
mcliquid (2023-11-07 16:00:44+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
mcliquid (2023-11-07 16:00:38+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
tomhukins (2023-11-08 13:36:14+00:00): Thank you for all your good work on OpenStreetMap.

This change adds a name of "Central Retail Park (demolished)" to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262183470 but I doubt "demolished" is or was part of its name: it's a description of its status.

The principles of "Name is the name only" described at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only and the Lifecycle prefix described at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix describe why "demolished" doesn't belong in the name in more detail.
maro21 (2023-11-07 21:05:58+00:00): Czy ten odcinek jest już zaprojektowany?
Kiedy rozpocznie się budowa?
syntex (2023-11-07 22:00:05+00:00): To na pewno nie jest paving_stones
mcliquid (2023-11-07 16:00:50+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
InsertUser (2023-11-11 22:03:22+00:00): It's a StreetComplete edit if you don't press save before getting on a plane you get a big bounding box. There is no option to split after the fact.
ivanbranco (2023-11-07 13:31:33+00:00): Nota: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=25132

di nuovo, per favore utilizza commenti ai changeset che abbiano un significato: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments

questo valore di place era stato stabilito nel changeset precedente (e molti altri) da un mapper locale con conoscenza del luogo. Vedo che tutti i tuoi ultimi changeset sono cambiamenti di value place=city/town. I tuoi edit hanno già sollevato dubbi nella comunità italiana, vedi: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-edits-in-italy/97706/105

Per favore astieniti da ulteriori modifiche del genere finché non ti sei prima interfacciato con la comunità in modo da evitare un'inutile edit war
eggie (2023-11-08 08:49:56+00:00): Dag Sven,  
Er verandert natuurlijk veel hier. 
Kan het zijn dat je wat te veel hebt weg gehaald?
Miste opeens m'n ingetekende water en de landuse langs de Oude Maas.

MVG
eggie
FERINA365 (2023-11-08 08:51:35+00:00): Hi eggie,

Ik ben hier vandaag nog bezig om de laatste stand van zaken in te tekenen!
eggie (2023-11-08 10:06:15+00:00): Ahh .. top!... Had net weer mijn 'water' ingetekend mbv de laatste pdok en sat data portaal/ Weet jij wanneer je weer over het weegje kan?
FERINA365 (2023-11-08 14:06:59+00:00): Het Weegje is in ieder geval tot het voorjaar van 2024 afgesloten (uitgelopen werkzaamheden aan het fietserstunneltje). Mij is sowieso niet duidelijk of het Weegje een weg voor gemotoriseerd verkeer blijft of veranderd in een fietspad. De verschillende tekeningen en artist impressions van SHIPP21 spreken elkaar tegen...
eggie (2023-11-08 14:16:43+00:00): We zien het wel...  Fiets er genoeg langs..  De knooppunt-fietsroute heb ik voorlopig omgeleid. Denk dat er niet aan de dijk mag worden gewerkt to het voorjaar. 
Ik laat die note nog wel even openstaan anders vergeet ik die fietsroute weer terug te leggen. 
Groet
eggie
FERINA365 (2023-11-09 15:13:43+00:00): Hi eggie,

Ben wel redelijk klaar hier! Heb op basis van tekeningen en huidige stand van zaken (Satellietdataportaal) alles ingetekend.
eggie (2023-11-07 13:55:17+00:00): Dag Gerben,
Je vraagt feedback Wanneer iets een fietsstraat is geworden dan voeg je toe 
cyclestreet=yes
traffic_sign=NL:L51

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:cyclestreet

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-11-07 13:59:24+00:00): Zie ook effect in deze layer
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/52.00115/5.56109&layers=Y
maraf24 (2024-03-18 20:29:38+00:00): Nie wiem w jakim celu mapujesz niestniejące tory. Rozebrano je kilka lat temu.
Wycofałem.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-07 13:35:05+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1675769345
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8261936058
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8261936055
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8261936058
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8261936055
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121948870
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/550240972
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155151331
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249390046
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/550240972
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249390046

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437981832

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Piotr Strębski (2023-11-09 11:00:51+00:00): poprawiowe
TrickyFoxy (2023-11-08 14:25:28+00:00): Вы немного не в то здание добавили. Поправил.
user_17222985 (2023-11-07 13:34:46+00:00): also translation
Tomas Straupis (2023-11-07 14:01:56+00:00): Hello, please do not change without agreement with local mappers. I wll revert these changes.
user_19808596 (2023-11-07 14:14:53+00:00): Hi,
in this changeset I added name:en, according to Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konstitucijos_Avenue.

This also made the road searchable on nominatim if you use "Konstitucijos Avenue".

Where is the issue?

Or maybe do refer to the other changesets where pr. was put instead of prospektas?
Kindly notes that OSM wiki clearly states:

"If the name can be spelled without an abbreviation, then don't abbreviate it. Computers can easily shorten words, but not the other way (St. could be Street or Saint). "

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(don't_do_it)

Is Lithuania not following OSM rules? In that case clearly add it to

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations
Tomas Straupis (2023-11-07 14:24:28+00:00): You can add name:en, but do not change name and name:lt tags. Do not expect local mappers to add name:en elsewhere, so much use for one street...
wiki.openstreetmap.org is just a website. It does not represent "official rules" because there are none. There are a lot of reasons why we do not use full street names in Lithuania. This has been discussed numerous times.
user_19808596 (2023-11-07 15:08:14+00:00): I made separate changesets but you reverted everything.

I do not (and never) expect that Lithuanian users put English names.

You can make you own rules, it's your country!
But if they are different from what you call "not official rules" inside the official OSM wiki, OK! However, you can't expect all the world to recognize your rules of you do not state it, and since you told "This has been discussed numerous times", why there nothing in OSM wiki?

Do you realize that if those rules were written we will not be here discussing?
Tomas Straupis (2023-11-07 15:26:05+00:00): Casunziei, can I make a friendly suggestion to firstly spend more time than several months in OSM and do a little bit more changes in your local area before going for some "global fixes"? I fully understand that your intentions are good, you want to help :-)
There is also no such thing as "official wiki". What you've shown is just "guidelines" or "suggestions". And if you look at all of them, they may be contradictory. For example there is a "on the ground rule". Have you seen "Konstitucijos avenue" or "Konstitucijos prospektas" written anywhere here? ;-)
user_19808596 (2023-11-07 15:42:13+00:00): Do not judge people based on just what you see in the profile ;)

You can find "Konstitucijos ave." at least here
https://www.revolut.com/en-LT/legal/terms/

and if an international user looks on nominatim with that name, he will get no results for that road but only removing "ave".

Is "Konstitucijos avenue" not the English name of this road?
Is "Konstitucijos prospektas" not the Lithuanian name? 
If they are not, you are encouraged to also update Wikipedia :)

Nevertheless, if you are not fine with OSM abbreviation rules inside the wiki, please update them with an exception, so no other users will use their time to fix something you do not want
Tomas Straupis (2023-11-07 20:42:11+00:00): Sorry, if I misjudge you, but you're making mistakes only prone to people not familiar with OSM in particular and IT/GIS in general. Can you point to the point ON THE GROUND (in real life, on the signs) with the full name you mention? I was born and live in Vilnius. My office for the last 15 years is in Konstitucijos pr. I can easily check.
Tomas Straupis (2023-11-07 20:44:02+00:00): You should also know that CCBYSA is not a compatible source for usage in OSM.
user_19808596 (2023-11-08 09:11:16+00:00): # name

name:en=Konstitucijos Avenue
name:lt=Konstitucijos pr.

Konstitucijos was present on both EN and LT and was already present in the original name. A renowned bank states in their English website states its address as "Konstitucijos Ave.", which correspond to Wikipedia. Konstitucijos is known to be the name of this road by local mappers as you admitted.

"pr." and "ave." are just abbreviations, and here they mean prospektas and avenue.
Avenue is just a translation of prospektas.

You cannot copyright any of that.

If you want to argue you can say that in EN "Konstitucijos" has not been literally translated. So, how do you say "Konstitucijos pr." in English?

# on the ground
As you should know, words on capital letters on internet equals to screaming, do not be rude! Of course this does not apply to acronyms.

How do you spell "Konstitucijos pr." with others people?
Do you say "Konstitucijos pr" or "Konstitucijos prospektas"?
It's hard to believe you will choose "pr", I will also laugh to hear you emitting this sound :)

Since you will use "prospektas" on real life, it is more than fair to not short this abbreviation on OSM.
It's clear that you do not agree on that, and you already had discussions with your local community, but:

- you did not provide any reference about that
- you seem not prone to include your statement in the wiki

I cannot force you to do so. But, regardless of your opinion with the OSM guidelines, it's pretty clear that the lack of it led to this discussion. If you do not want to take action with the wiki, that's fine! However, this will only result in further users to have no idea of it, and in that case you will be morally responsible. Otherwise, do have I to believe that you like to argue with others, and you will keep harassing unknown user removing their work because you like to be so strict about abbreviations you see in a sign?

Now I am out of this conversation, If you would like to keep it up just find other people.
L'imaginaire (2023-12-05 10:43:18+00:00): Welkom aan de nieuwe buren ;-)
silversurfer83 (2023-12-15 14:19:44+00:00): Gude :)

Ich fuhr gerade in der RB97 an diesem Unterstand vorbei und habe noch einmal geguckt. Da steht kein Name am Schild und daher halte ich es nicht für korrekt, an die B+R diese Namen zu schreiben. Ich habe auch nochmal Rücksprache mit erfahrenen Kollegen hier gehalten und die sind auch der Meinung, dass hier kein Name im Sinne von
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name
vorliegt.

Es gibt häufiger Wanderparkplätze die einen ausgeschilderten Namen haben, wo das entsprechend eingetragen werden kann. 

Grüße
Silversurfer83
Frans S (2023-12-27 14:25:48+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
buildings not squared




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143738036
eggie (2023-11-07 14:04:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Zo te zien heb je het hele gebouw verwijderd. Wellicht de building= verwijderd?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-11-07 14:10:06+00:00): Lastig om te zien wat je hebt gedaan.
Al die gebouwen maar ook het adres zitten in een relatie?

Is dat het werk van jou?
eggie (2023-11-07 14:12:37+00:00): De building tag heb ik hersteld, want anders zie je geen gebouw.. Waarom moeten die nodes in een relatie? Het geeft allemaal foutmeldingen.
eggie (2023-11-07 14:15:17+00:00): Kennelijk ben je nu ook bezig, want ik krijg meer foutmeldingen.
eggie (2023-11-07 14:22:53+00:00): Ik heb het gebouw hersteld. Dit is lastig denk ik voor starters. 
Het gebouw is de outer en de binnenplaats te inner.
Paar keer ctrl-f5 .. dan zou het gebouw weer terug moeten komen.
Groet
eggie
oscarwashere (2023-11-07 15:39:01+00:00): Het is de bedoeling dat alle gebouwen binnen de rondweg op het terrein (wat dus ook tussen de bomen staat) bij Science Park Zeist behoren. Dat is de nieuwe naam van het gehele complex. Volgens mij zie ik nu alleen nog de onderste twee gebouwen aan de zijde van de straat 'Crosestein' apart aangemerkt. Wel ook met de juiste naam.
eggie (2023-11-07 15:56:30+00:00): Dat laatste klopt, want die naam heb je zelf aangepast op de aparte gebouwomtrekken.
De naam Science Park Zeist die je op het grote gebouw ziet staat in het midden van de relatie. Dat zou eigenlijk voldoende moeten zijn. De namen van de zuidelijke gebouwen kunnen denk ik wel weg. Ze zitten immers in de relatie. 
Maar wanneer je aparte namen wil zien op de zuidelijke gebouwen kun je het zo laten. 
De building=yes tag kan van de bijgebouwen af. Die staat immers op de relatie zelf. Het geeft nu foutmeldingen. Ik kijk wel even hoe het te fixen.
eggie (2023-11-07 15:58:23+00:00): building=yes verwijderd van neven gebouwen.
eggie (2023-11-07 16:01:58+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk :)
De node amenity=parking op de parkeerplaats verwijderd. Dat is dubbel op.
Dat charging_point moet dat wellicht een charging_station zijn?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
eggie (2023-11-07 16:06:10+00:00): De namen zul je nu wel niet meer zien, want ik heb de building=yes verwijderd.
Dat hoort daar niet.. Die tag zit in de relatie. De naam staat daar ook en zal ergens in het midden te zien zijn.
Wanneer je aparte namen wil zien. dan zul je de gebouwen uit die relatie moeten halen.

Wanneer ik in raadselen spreek vraag gerust.
YPGGUUY (2023-12-13 17:47:05+00:00): 您好, 感谢您更新地图.
我们注意到 碧桂园·幸福里 (1221767835) 的边界和道路粘连. 这是不太好的实践, 盖因会轻微妨碍道路的编辑. 道路上的元素(比如斑马线)会复合到小区的边界上. 公交站也会被囊括到小区(边界)中, 消去其公共设施的属性.
我已经修订了您的提交, 希望这不会冒犯到您.
eggie (2023-11-07 14:26:14+00:00): Dag Alex

access=no betekent dat er niemand mag komen. Verboden Toegang.
De bollard zal door z'n ingebakken accesstags gewoon z'n werk doen. Ik haal even wat accesstags weg.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-11-07 14:30:13+00:00): access=no verwijderd (Dat is bijna altijd verkeerd gebruikt in dit soort situaties) en er even een voetgangersgebied van gemaakt. Of de bollard hier fixed is?   Heb m'n twijfels. 
MVG
eggie
map per (2023-11-07 20:12:37+00:00): Hallo rms_ALG,

hier ist die Bushaltestelle jetzt doppelt eingezeichnet (vgl. (1) und (2)).

Viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11331155977
(2) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4179349338
map per (2023-11-18 12:30:19+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur
Branko Kokanovic (2023-11-26 11:50:47+00:00): iz nekog cudnog razloga, ovde si stavio surface=асфалтс. Ispravio sam, nego rekoh da ti ukazem, mozda se ponavlja zbog nacina kako radis (a mozda je samo slucajno)
gscholz (2023-11-08 07:06:13+00:00): Hi alisari55,
your recent edits have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=35.92493&lat=41.52759&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Your new landuse areas also overlap with already existing landuse areas. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
pán Petrík (2023-11-10 16:53:35+00:00): cau, Klerik. Preco si mi vymazal nazov bodu? Dal si ho sice do popisu, ale ja sa obavam, ze ked si potom ktokolvek da vyhladat 300-ročná lipa, ze ten bod mu nenajde a potom je ten bod na mape takmer zbytocny.