piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
sw_uwu (2025-02-15 18:16:12+00:00): Danke für die ausgiebige Erklärung!

Sollten dann, wenn separat gemappte Gehsteige an Kreuzungen enden, diese direkt mit der Node verbunden werden, an der die Straßen sich verbinden? (Siehe way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311338084 welcher Richtung nordost nur mit der Erich-Kästner-Straße verbunden ist und nicht mit der Thomas Mann Straße. Das würde es möglicherweise Routern erheblich leichter machen, die separat gemappten Gehsteige zu erkennen/finden.)

Es scheint etwas komisch, dass der separat gemappte sidewalk einer Straße nicht mit der Straße selbst, auf der sidewalk=separate getagged ist, verbunden ist.
sw_uwu (2025-02-15 18:18:08+00:00): Gutes Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311338085

Dieser separate Gehweg ist direkt mit der Kreuzung-Node verbunden.
sw_uwu (2025-02-15 21:42:18+00:00): Noch eine Frage: Würdest Du Wege wie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148776967 auch löschen (bzw. tagging mit der Straße zusammenführen), oder wegen dem erhöhten Bordstein beibehalten?
Michi (2025-02-24 22:49:01+00:00): (Sorry für die späte Antwort)

𝘋𝘢𝘴 𝘸𝘶̈𝘳𝘥𝘦 𝘦𝘴 𝘮𝘰̈𝘨𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘸𝘦𝘪𝘴𝘦 𝘙𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯 𝘦𝘳𝘩𝘦𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘭𝘦𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘮𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘯, 𝘥𝘪𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘵 𝘨𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘵𝘦𝘯 𝘎𝘦𝘩𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘪𝘨𝘦 𝘻𝘶 𝘦𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘯/𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯.

Stimmt, so etwas ließe sich verbessern, in dem man dem Gehsteig noch ein footway=sidewalk spendiert. Auf der anderen Seite müsste ein Router doch die Logik haben, den nähesten, parallelen Way zur Straße, der für Fußgänger erlaubt ist, entsprechend zum Routing zu verwenden.

𝘌𝘴 𝘴𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘵 𝘦𝘵𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘬𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘩, 𝘥𝘢𝘴𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘵 𝘨𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘵𝘦 𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘸𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘳 𝘚𝘵𝘳𝘢ß𝘦 𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘵 𝘮𝘪𝘵 𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘚𝘵𝘳𝘢ß𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘣𝘴𝘵, 𝘢𝘶𝘧 𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘸𝘢𝘭𝘬=𝘴𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘢𝘨𝘨𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘴𝘵, 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘣𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘴𝘵.

Das ist wohl abhängig von der Gegebenheiten vor Ort. Hier in diesem konkreten Fall endet der separate Gehsteig zufällig in zwei anderen Wegen. Hier z.B. ist es anders, da fängt die Separierung mitten drin an: https://www.osm.org/node/254525192

𝘋𝘪𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘦𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘎𝘦𝘩𝘸𝘦𝘨 𝘪𝘴𝘵 𝘥𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘬𝘵 𝘮𝘪𝘵 𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘒𝘳𝘦𝘶𝘻𝘶𝘯𝘨-𝘕𝘰𝘥𝘦 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘣𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯.

Hier empfinde ich immer das Dilemma, wohin mit dem Ende des separaten Ways. Lieber direkt an die H.-M.-Str. oder doch 90°-Knick und zur T.-M.-Str.? In solchen Fällen gehe ich den Mittelweg und nehme einfach die Kreuzungs-Node. 😬

𝘞𝘶̈𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘋𝘶 𝘞𝘦𝘨𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘦 ... 𝘢𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘭𝘰̈𝘴𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘯 (𝘣𝘻𝘸. 𝘵𝘢𝘨𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘪𝘵 𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘚𝘵𝘳𝘢ß𝘦 𝘻𝘶𝘴𝘢𝘮𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘧𝘶̈𝘩𝘳𝘦𝘯), 𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘸𝘦𝘨𝘦𝘯 𝘥𝘦𝘮 𝘦𝘳𝘩𝘰̈𝘩𝘵𝘦𝘯 𝘉𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘪𝘯 𝘣𝘦𝘪𝘣𝘦𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘦𝘯?

Diese Wege würde ich nicht als separaten Way mappen sondern die Information Gehsteig / Fahrradweg mit an den Breite-Wiese-Way nehmen. Dann gibt es auch keine Probleme bezüglich oneway für den ganzen Gehsteig-Way vs. nur für Fahrräder.
Michi (2025-03-24 21:22:23+00:00): Für diese kurzen Kreuzungs-Verbindungs-Wege habe ich zuletzt das Tag placement=transition gefunden:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:placement%3Dtransition

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1370978544
wildmaps (2024-11-29 17:26:43+00:00): Grazie Marco!
MarcoR (2024-11-29 21:24:56+00:00): Figurati, se vuoi/puoi migliora pure (io mi sono basato sul tuo disegno).

Buon mapping!
Yunkers (2024-11-26 13:57:57+00:00): A co się zmieniło wg nowej klasyfikacji? Zmieniliśmy znaczenie tagu motorway, o trunkach nic nie ma.
Xeff (2025-05-02 13:19:32+00:00): Ist die Nutzung von destroyed:path hier die richtige Wahl? Dadurch würde dann jedes Routingtool den Weg nicht verwenden. Der ganze Weg ist ja schon als schlecht erkennbar gezeichnet. Nichtsdestotrotz ist es ein offizieller Weg. So wie ich das sehe liegt dort ein Schneefeld was sich idR lange hält, oft machen sich die Wegepfleger dafür nicht die Mühe.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159592372
ZepMap (2025-05-15 20:21:23+00:00): Hallo Xeff,
es war genau die Intention, dass kein Routing-Tool diesen Weg vorschlägt. Es ist schlichtweg kein Weg mehr vorhanden. Durch die oberhalb liegende Schuttrinne ist der Weg zerstört und es bildet sich auch kein neuer. Es ist nicht so, dass der Weg nur unterhalb eines Schneefelds liegt.

Es gab bereits eine Diskussion über die Verwendung des Tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3441339
JayTurnr (2024-11-25 22:41:30+00:00): Disconnected a road from the landuse
user_11609320 (2024-11-25 22:42:17+00:00): https://www.cusocal.org/CreditUnionOfSouthernCalifornia/media/PDFs/PICU-Merger-PR_Final.pdf
user_11609320 (2024-11-25 22:42:37+00:00): https://www.cusocal.org/CreditUnionOfSouthernCalifornia/media/PDFs/Pac-Trans-Merger-PR_Final.pdf
Jordi MF (2024-11-25 23:15:31+00:00): Hola Josepvc,

Solo te informo que en este punto, actualmente, hay dos nodos que repiten la información sobre la situación del Tossal del Corb. Uno, mapeado como "hill" y otro mapeado como "peak". El primero no lo añadí yo, aunque lo edité posteriormente. El segundo es el que acabas de añadir.

El primeo, contiene la elevación proporcionada por el IGN. El segundo, entiendo que debe de ser la elevación proporcionada por el ICV. No sé cuál es más fiable.

No seré yo quién elimine o modifique uno de los dos nodos, pero según el principio "un objeto, un elemento" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Un_objeto,_un_elemento_OSM), no es correcto que existan dos PDIs para un mismo elemento.

Por último, la partida "el Tossal del Corb", aparece con el artículo según el ICV (y la AVL). Esto es habitual en algunos municipios valencianos: se añade el artículo "el" o "la" para referirse a la partida, mientras que 
para el elemento geográfico o la masía no se añade dicho artículo.

Saludos.
theDM (2024-11-26 13:52:08+00:00): Cześć. Dyskusja na temat zmiany zasad stosowania highway=trunk dopiero się zaczęła i na ten moment obowiązują dotychczasowa definicja okrojona o dwujezdniowe ekspresówki przemianowane na motorway.
Langlaeufer (2024-11-26 09:08:54+00:00): hallo Hb,
Das ist merkwürdig:
Wie hast du es geschafft das aus dem Way für die Straße ein Gebäude geworden ist? https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/724697379
Grüße und frohes Mappen Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159593011
Langlaeufer (2024-11-26 09:10:13+00:00): Die IDs von gelöschten ways wurden offensichtlich neu vergeben
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159593011
Hb- (2024-11-26 09:47:46+00:00): Mit JOSM - Geometrie ersetzen.  Warum nutzt Du dieses Werkzeug nicht? Reicht der Online-Editor?
Langlaeufer (2024-11-26 10:12:23+00:00): Josm nutze ich gelegentlich, das dynamische und das rendering von id kommt mir meist mehr engegen. "Geometrie ersetzen" kannte ich noch nicht. Scheint mir aber nicht sinnvoll, wenn ein way an komplett neuer Stelle für ein anderes Objekt wiederverwendet wird
Langlaeufer (2024-11-26 11:16:12+00:00): Hast du dich verklickt oder war das Absicht, die ID- der Straße für das Gebäude wiederzuverwenden? Du hast auch einige Gebäude gelöscht und an entfernter neuer Stelle wieder aufleben lassen.
Hb- (2024-11-27 12:58:58+00:00): Die Gebäude wurden verschoben.
regardingworth110 (2024-11-25 23:08:53+00:00): Business name* not building.
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-26 16:16:28+00:00): Which imagery does this street appear on?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159593276
Oier_ (2024-11-26 22:46:16+00:00): Kaixo Bash_

Lagarte-ko tontoraren izena aldatu duzula ikusi dut, Gipuzkoako toponimoen zerrendan Lagarte dago onartuta ofizial bezala. Ikusi dut Larte, Laarte edo Almitxuri ere deitzen zaiola "herri deitura" bezala. Toponimo ofizialera itzuli eta alt_name bezala bestea ezartzen badugu zer iruditzen zaizu? Esango didazu, mila esker!
garaolaza (2024-11-27 10:52:50+00:00): Kaixo Bash_ 

Erroizperi Larte izena jarri diozula ikusi dut. Zein da hori egitearen arrazoia? Izan ere La(ga)rte ekialderago dagoen mendiaren izena da, Oier_ erabiltzaileak adierazi dizun moduan.

Eskerrik asko
Bash_ (2024-12-08 18:09:15+00:00): Kaixo:
Zuzenketaren arrazoia mendi horren izena Erroizpe ez delako izan da, beinere ez da ala izan maperan izen hori agertu arren. Ingurukoak garenok oso ongi dakigu Erroizpe non dagoen, eta tontorretik gertu dagoen arren ez da tontorraren izena, ez da beinere izan. Gain horren osoaren izena Larte izan da, bi gaintxo izanagatik mendi osoari izen bat eman izan zaio, Larte hain zuzen ere. Erroizpe izena benetan okerra da, izenak berak esan nahi duenari erreparatzen badiogu ez du inongo zentzurik tontor baten izena izateak, Erroitz = amildegi baita eta pe = azpia , beraz, Erroizpe = amildegi azpiari deritzo, hain zuzen ere ingurukoak garenok Erroizpe izenen ezagutzen dugun tokia den bezalakoxea. Erroizpe parajea , tontorretik iparraldera dagoen amildegi eta haren azpiko basoak duen izena da, Belauntzako lurretan dagoena eta ez Gaztelun. Gipuzkoako artxibo probintzialean Erroizpe izena jarri eta agertzen diren sarrera bakarrak Belauntzakoak dira, eta ez Gaztelukoak. Okerra duela urte mordoa egin zen mapa oker batean dago, Erroizpe parajea tontorretik gertu egoteak mapan tontorra izendatzeko erabiltzea eragin zuen, guztiz okerra izan arren, eta ondorengo mapetan akatsa kopiatu besterik ez dute egin.
Bash_ (2024-12-08 18:12:41+00:00): Eta bidearen izena aldatze berriz , Aiztunalde izenarekin agertzen zen. Aiztunalde Berastegi herrian dagoen baserri auzo baten izena da, Elduainekin mugan, beraz, ez du zentzurik or Aiztunalde izena agertzeak, Aiztunalde hortik oso urruti baitago.
garaolaza (2024-12-08 18:22:24+00:00): Ados Bash! nabari da tokia ondo ezagutzen duzula, eskerrik asko azalpenengatik. Lehenik ere gertatu dira horrelako kontuak beste mendietan. 

Ba al dago zuk esandakoa baieztatzen duen mapa edo dokumenturik? Berdin zait Gazteluko udala, Foru aldundia, Euskaltzaindia, Mendizaleen elkartea edo dena delakoa, baina orain momentuan bi "Larte" daude mapan, eta badirudi hainbat erakundetatik Lagarte hobetsi dela... ba hori, egoera argitu ahal izateko. Eskerrik asko!
Baloo Uriza (2025-06-30 14:42:29+00:00): Got enough added there that the rest should be easy work in the StreetComplete app and tracing buildings.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159593678
Javierpf (2024-11-26 19:43:05+00:00): Hola Darleith. I was recently working on updating this new highway, like you, to Cosquin and other towns of Punilla Valley.
I noticed you added new features such as tunnels and bridges when old roads or streams intersected the new highway. It seems some of them, are nonexistent actually, could be? When I edited the highway I checked some satellite images of the construction trying to figure out where those crossing roads were. I didn't add in my edition if I wasn't absolutely sure of its location, despite it will trigger some issues. 
I would like to ask you if you are sure of the location of the intersections. Maybe you put them just to fix that crossing issue.
I have some clues that are not in the right place at least, but I haven't a recent satellite image or travel the highway to confirm.
If you are not quite sure, could you please revert them? Remember it is not mapping for the map but for reality. 
Maybe someone else sees the issue and figures out the way the roads intersects. Thanks. Javier
gpserror (2024-11-26 00:13:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for adding the dispensary.

I do have some comments - you should add it with tag shop=cannabis so that people can search for any cannabis shop regardless of its name (so shops named like "star buds" will show up even if they're just searching for THC.)  Since you're using iD, you can actually search through the object type for  "cannabis" and it will pop up as an option.  You can just make another edit to change this!

Again thanks for your contribution!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-26 00:30:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4233208428
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1337837508

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
tonyf1 (2024-12-13 00:14:05+00:00): I talked to the first time author. The edits were made on local knowledge and not on Vic Map.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-09 10:01:05+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12374889564/history has amenity = convenience that was added in this edit
What was meant by amenity=convenience? Is it a convenience shop? Then shop=convenience is likely a better tagging, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dconvenience .
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-09 10:01:52+00:00): and shop=convenience is already there - is amenity = convenience adding anything?
Jarek 🚲 (2024-11-27 16:08:16+00:00): Hey, thanks for updating the relation! One problem though - the 501 goes on Church Street, not Victoria Street - both ways.
lastcommodore (2024-11-27 16:28:57+00:00): Bit silly of me. I dont know how i noticed.
Fixed it in 159667990, alongside stops (because i forgot about those as well). thanks for the notif!
Jarek 🚲 (2024-11-29 17:00:54+00:00): Cool, thanks! Just as a heads up, I tweaked the note on the stops in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159749749 and marked some more stops as disused
Pam's Store Tilba Tilba (2024-11-26 03:15:38+00:00): Pam's Store Tilba Tilba
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:16:09+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165095056
martianfreeloader (2024-11-26 20:36:33+00:00): Hello,
When you tag roads as under construction, please remember to add the construction=* tag.

For example, on the section of Verovoška ulica that you've tagged as under construction, there should be a construction=tertiary tag.
woodpeck (2024-12-03 17:34:20+00:00): Mazda05, please stop this edit war (and all other edit wars). Instead contact DWG to resolve the issue. I have now commented on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159583208
Mazda05 (2024-12-04 12:47:20+00:00): woodpeck, Okay, I won't cancel the edit of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159891315 just yet. However, the big question is whether replacing tags is an edit war — as there is no dispute. I give arguments and sources for "access=no", but member https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TesDen doesn't give any arguments, sources and does not argue, periodically making changes to OSM.


I answered in more detail in the changeset you mentioned https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159583208. And will await confirmation of the ability to undo the edit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159891315.


Regards, Mazda05
luiswoo (2025-02-08 14:18:32+00:00): Why hasn't the vandal Mazda05 been blocked yet? He closes the roads, citing the decrees of the Ukrainian government, which the Ukrainian government is actually unable to implement, since it does not control these territories.
Mazda05 (2025-02-08 15:39:46+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access — it's not about someone else's control. There is no control by the Russian authorities in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/336140766 and nearby. This does not cancel the sovereignty and legal Russian authorities over this territory, as enshrined in the current State Border Treaty and the Constitution of the Russian Federation (Article 4, Article 15.4). The same applies to the lack of RF control over the settlements and roads previously near https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/336141081 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1589227483. Your edits are canceled due to vandalism https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism#Vandalism_and_other_types_of_bad_editing, as you deliberately change the data to incorrect data and enter incorrect data (points 7 "Purposeful removal or degradation of data that are known to be correct" and 8 "Deliberate adding incorrect data"), which in this case do not match the description of the access tag, as well as insulting the participant with notes (point 10 "insulting or contentless notes"). If you don't understand what legality of use and passage is, what is indicated by the access tag, and what sovereignty is, study these entities. Until then, stop the vandalism
garaolaza (2025-09-08 06:39:19+00:00): Kaixo,

Berriz ere Larte jarri zenion nere ustez Erroizpe den mendiari. Kontutan izan orain bi Larte ditugula mapan. 

Neretzat fidagarriena hau izaten da, Gipuzkoako Foru Aldundiko mapa.

https://b5m.gipuzkoa.eus/map/eu/G_A119376?tool=pan&map=topo-latest&zoom=17&center=-2.01316%2C43.12397

Argituko dugu egoera bion artean?  Eskerrik asko!
garaolaza (2025-09-08 06:41:07+00:00): Artikulu hau ere argigarria da:

https://www.mendikat.net/com/mount/722
Glassman (2024-11-26 18:10:58+00:00): #TIP: we spell out street names in OSM. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159597763
mrkaragoz (2024-11-26 06:57:15+00:00): Slow down buddy.
opendcc (2024-11-26 07:21:38+00:00): Sorry for large changeset bounding box. Missed a upload.
Glassman (2024-11-26 18:09:11+00:00): It looks like you acidentally changed a landuse to a stream. Can you change it back to land use. The new stream you added looks great, you even added the culvert.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159597900
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-26 13:35:05+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159616696
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-11-29 06:24:29+00:00): Em ơi, relation này em gọi lại chính tả của thằng from nha

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18332978

là from chứ hông phải form 

Mấy này chú ý xíu. Sau khi edit xong cỡ 5 phút thì em vào https://ahorn.lima-city.de/tr/ và zoom tới vị trí biển báo em vừa edit để trang này nó QC/QA cho em nha
zeddzeus (2024-11-27 05:59:32+00:00): small shortcut road to connects NH
Vas111 (2024-11-27 22:04:04+00:00): Hello, there's a bus gate going south on Market Street, hence the turn restriction. Please don't remove it
Nakaner (2024-11-26 12:44:46+00:00): Hallo,

herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und vielen Dank für das Erfassen der Defibrillatoren.

Wenn die Gebäude von außen als Haus 1/Halle 3/… gekennzeichnet sind, wäre es sinnvoll, das auch in OSM zu erfassen (als Name des Gebäudes). Den Namen der Firma kannst du dann auf die Fläche des Firmengeländes übertragen (das darf übrigens auch die Parkplätze des Betriebs umfassen).

Viele Grüße

Michael
eggie (2024-11-26 07:10:46+00:00): Dag iRubens
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=159600206

Ik heb access=no verwijderd.
Het zou anders nog niet routeren.

MVG
eggie
Bexhill-OSM (2024-11-26 16:13:55+00:00): Thanks. Sometimes JOSM doesn't flag these geometry issues. Is there a tool I can use to check for intersecting ways?
BCNorwich (2024-11-26 18:21:12+00:00): Hi, Yes OSM Inspector, here's a link, :- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-0.97797&lat=52.06026&zoom=7&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way
It's updated usually every 24 hours. I go through the UK geometry every morning correcting what I can.

Regards Bernard.
kornad (2024-11-29 14:21:34+00:00): Na jakiej podstawie wprowadzasz tę zmianę? Dlaczego usunąłeś te budynki? Bankructwo firmy jak to nazywasz, a tak naprawdę zamykanie fabryki i wystawianie zakładu na sprzedaż, nie oznacza wyburzenia budynków. Wystarczyło zmienić ich nazwę. Do poprawy.
kornad (2024-12-02 08:19:32+00:00): Zmiany wycofane - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159832296
M A W1 (2024-11-26 07:01:49+00:00): This place is a name of village Lateef Nagar which located in dipalpur okara Punjab Pakistan
rhhs (2024-11-26 09:03:21+00:00): Not many times, if you care to discuss it before reverting my edits. The sign that a motorway starts is here https://maps.app.goo.gl/GhDR21UugYuTWQPN8 Before that sign, the road does not have motorway status, so I changed it to trunk road. See also this discussion https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/where-does-a-motorway-begin-and-end/117844
foreigner037 (2024-11-26 09:07:47+00:00): Please look at the history of the ways. This is atleast the 8th time this was discussed in the last 2 years. Under the II-18 bridge there is a green milestone that marks km 0 of the motorway.
rhhs (2024-11-26 09:48:00+00:00): We should map the on-the-ground truth. It is a fact that the ways you edited do not have motorway legal status (you can ride a bike or a horse on it if you like), so it is not a motorway. That the kilometer marks start earlier than the motorway is confusing, but not a reason to consider it a motorway, I think. Same for the section at Правешки ханове: it is legally not a motorway (although you can't legally reach it on horseback). You mention that it was discussed (where?) but you are the only one reverting edits by others who think it should be tagged as a trunk or primary road.
foreigner037 (2024-11-26 09:57:10+00:00): https://api.bg/bg/programa-za-remonti-na-republikanskite-putishcha-za-2022-godina.html

https://api.bg/bg/gis.html

According to the road agency's GIS, the motorway starts under the bridge and ends in Varna with no breaks inbetween.
foreigner037 (2024-11-26 10:05:19+00:00): The signs in these sections are also green (including kilometer markers), which are only to be used on motorways

https://lex.bg/laws/ldoc/-13618687


https://maps.app.goo.gl/FXkFa9HSGTq8CJg49

Near Praveshki Hanove one side was recently renovated and they put green signs again, but Street View hasn't been updated yet:

https://maps.app.goo.gl/qEtPdK5JPtbAYKbp8

https://maps.app.goo.gl/ncoFVaEu4MFKpXYPA

Don't get me wrong, I am not trying to start a conflict, this is just not the first time that it is discussed.
rhhs (2024-11-26 10:59:59+00:00): OK. I put it up for discussion here https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/motorway-status-of/122136 and hope that will solve the issue. Please add your opinion.
BCNorwich (2024-11-26 08:18:02+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I wonder has Natwest ceased to operate from the building and have the two ATMs on the High Street been removed? If so the map ought to be amended to this effect.

Lastly does Gail's occupy the whole building and is it a cafe as well as a bakery.

Regards Bernard.
Flanked6968 (2024-11-26 11:20:19+00:00): Yes, the ATMs are gone. I made this change separately through Organic Maps. 

Also Gail's occupies the whole building and is a cafe too.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-26 07:40:51+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542488168

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mcliquid (2024-12-22 08:07:44+00:00): Hallo zusammen,
ihr habt hier auf dem Kienberg-Weg ein absolutes Betretungsverbot eingetragen. Ist dies vor Ort auch so ausgeschildert? Oder wird lediglich von der Benützung abgeraten, da es sich hier um einen T3 oder T4 Wanderweg handelt? Dafür sollte man andere Attribute verwenden.
Ich freue mich auf eine Rückmeldung.
Vielen Dank!
eggie (2024-11-26 08:26:12+00:00): Dag Therry   Lijkt me oke...  Genoeg te zoen hier..  Veel wegen en landuse liggen er allemaal naast hier.
Heb even een beginnetje gemaakt met uitlijnen. 
Mapse,
eggie
mavl (2024-11-26 15:01:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159620751 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16917].
Khidistavi (2024-11-26 10:35:12+00:00): You were warned a few hours ago about the inadmissibility of deleting Armenian names in name:hy

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16915

but despite this, you continue to vandalize the map.
cybermapper (2024-11-26 10:47:13+00:00): You are too democratic to call this vandalizing. I am preventing vandals from the map, then add name:hy to all the streets on Earth. If you don't add them to every node in the world, you are vandal too.