piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mapiate (2023-10-20 13:07:29+00:00): Hi Seale87, welcome to OSM and thanks for your contributions! Normally in the United States, the address information would be applied to a node or a building, please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses Also adding the other address components, like street name, city/town, and postal codes are helpful to add as it can improve search results. If you have questions or need help, just reach out.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142779294
bxl-forever (2023-10-21 21:37:54+00:00): Bonjour.
Je suppose que votre intention est que votre point soit visible et trouvable. Donc il ne faut pas oublier de mettre surtout le bon tag pour dire à la carte ce que c'est.
Il faut ajouter : office=it
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aoffice%3Dit
vng_me (2023-10-23 18:27:42+00:00): Are ways 119301138, 417187208 really yours changes? History shows it is yours. It looks like a vandalism.
vng_me (2023-10-23 18:35:09+00:00): UPD: Sorry, seems like somebody else did this vandalism and it was reverted, but your valid edits was intersected with these ways.
Gorka115 (2023-10-24 08:35:15+00:00): hello, yes, I agree, someone else did that vandalism on my changeset (or the two got connected); I never did that coastline erratic shape, as written I added buildings. Thanks for letting me know.
osmapper7 (2023-11-19 16:34:44+00:00): 据我了解，广州红专厂已经关闭多年了，土地会重新规划开发。
请问您这个changeset里面，将 Way 313820026 由 landuse=brownfield	改回 commercial 是有什么最新的依据吗？
Z_Empty (2023-11-19 17:06:04+00:00): 因为以前去过，且根据最新的卫星影像看到大部分建筑还存在着，不知道面临拆迁。刚刚了解了一下，确实已经关闭，稍等会改过来
bxl-forever (2023-10-21 21:40:55+00:00): Don’t forget to add proper tags to it → tourism=gallery in this case.

+ The street name does not match.  "Rue" starts with an upper letter.

+ Can you please review the location of this gallery.  It looks like you attached it to the middle of the road, whereas it should probably be inside a building.
Glassman (2023-10-19 18:21:16+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142781084
Glassman (2023-10-19 18:21:37+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142781456
Glassman (2023-10-19 18:22:32+00:00): #TIP: We don't use descriptive names in OSM. only name items that are properly named
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142781644
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-10-19 02:03:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 142785178, 142788339 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-about-limit-new-accounts/101656/228 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-10-19 02:03:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 142785178, 142788339 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-about-limit-new-accounts/101656/228 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-10-19 02:03:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 142785178, 142788339 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-about-limit-new-accounts/101656/228 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-10-19 02:03:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 142785178, 142788339 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-about-limit-new-accounts/101656/228 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-10-19 02:03:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 142785178, 142788339 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-about-limit-new-accounts/101656/228 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-10-19 02:03:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 142785178, 142788339 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-about-limit-new-accounts/101656/228 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-10-19 02:03:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 142785178, 142788339 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-about-limit-new-accounts/101656/228 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-10-19 02:03:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 142785178, 142788339 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-about-limit-new-accounts/101656/228 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-10-19 02:03:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 142785178, 142788339 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-about-limit-new-accounts/101656/228 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-10-19 02:03:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 142785178, 142788339 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-about-limit-new-accounts/101656/228 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-10-19 02:03:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 142785178, 142788339 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-about-limit-new-accounts/101656/228 etc.
impiaaa (2023-10-19 17:52:09+00:00): Please use the changeset comment field to describe what you changed and why; for example, "added taxiways and grass areas in airports." More examples here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Also, please save your changes in one area before moving to another, to keep the changeset area small.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-10-19 02:03:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 142785178, 142788339 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-about-limit-new-accounts/101656/228 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-10-19 02:03:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 142785178, 142788339 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed name changes.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-about-limit-new-accounts/101656/228 etc.
Glassman (2023-10-19 18:29:48+00:00): when you added the hotel you also added a turning loop to the far eastern node of the hotel. Also - you have a duplicate hotel node that should be merged with he building. 

And I'm not sure why you removed the service road into the hotel.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142782343
Barroszt (2023-10-18 21:01:50+00:00): Proszę nie usuwać tagu, który podaję nazwę w języku rosyjskim dla obiektów geograficznych położonych poza granicami Rosji, czyli name:ru. W OpenStreetMap nie interesuje nas to jaką opinie masz na temat danego państwa (każde państwo jest równe), a tym że mapy bardziej odzwierciedlają rzeczywistość i są dostępne dla ludzi porozumiewającymi się za pomocą wielu języków. Jeżeli Ci zależy na konstruktywnym rozwijaniu strony to proszę zająć się czymś poważnym, a dalsze kontynuowanie zakazanych praktyk może się zakończyć pernamentną blokadą, założoną przez jednego z administratorów.
Z poważaniem.
Edytor OpenStreetMap z Torunia :D
Barroszt (2023-10-18 21:01:20+00:00): Proszę nie usuwać tagu, który podaję nazwę w języku rosyjskim dla obiektów geograficznych położonych poza granicami Rosji, czyli name:ru. W OpenStreetMap nie interesuje nas to jaką opinie masz na temat danego państwa (każde państwo jest równe), a tym że mapy bardziej odzwierciedlają rzeczywistość i są dostępne dla ludzi porozumiewającymi się za pomocą wielu języków. Jeżeli Ci zależy na konstruktywnym rozwijaniu strony to proszę zająć się czymś poważnym, a dalsze kontynuowanie zakazanych praktyk może się zakończyć pernamentną blokadą, założoną przez jednego z administratorów.
Z poważaniem.
Edytor OpenStreetMap z Torunia :D
Barroszt (2023-10-18 21:00:22+00:00): Proszę nie usuwać tagu, który podaję nazwę w języku rosyjskim dla obiektów geograficznych położonych poza granicami Rosji, czyli name:ru. W OpenStreetMap nie interesuje nas to jaką opinie masz na temat danego państwa (każde państwo jest równe), a tym że mapy bardziej odzwierciedlają rzeczywistość i są dostępne dla ludzi porozumiewającymi się za pomocą wielu języków. Jeżeli Ci zależy na konstruktywnym rozwijaniu strony to proszę zająć się czymś poważnym, a dalsze kontynuowanie zakazanych praktyk może się zakończyć pernamentną blokadą, założoną przez jednego z administratorów.
Z poważaniem.
Edytor OpenStreetMap z Torunia :D
Barroszt (2023-10-18 21:02:15+00:00): Proszę nie usuwać tagu, który podaję nazwę w języku rosyjskim dla obiektów geograficznych położonych poza granicami Rosji, czyli name:ru. W OpenStreetMap nie interesuje nas to jaką opinie masz na temat danego państwa (każde państwo jest równe), a tym że mapy bardziej odzwierciedlają rzeczywistość i są dostępne dla ludzi porozumiewającymi się za pomocą wielu języków. Jeżeli Ci zależy na konstruktywnym rozwijaniu strony to proszę zająć się czymś poważnym, a dalsze kontynuowanie zakazanych praktyk może się zakończyć pernamentną blokadą, założoną przez jednego z administratorów.
Z poważaniem.
Edytor OpenStreetMap z Torunia :D
Barroszt (2023-10-18 21:00:50+00:00): Proszę nie usuwać tagu, który podaję nazwę w języku rosyjskim dla obiektów geograficznych położonych poza granicami Rosji, czyli name:ru. W OpenStreetMap nie interesuje nas to jaką opinie masz na temat danego państwa (każde państwo jest równe), a tym że mapy bardziej odzwierciedlają rzeczywistość i są dostępne dla ludzi porozumiewającymi się za pomocą wielu języków. Jeżeli Ci zależy na konstruktywnym rozwijaniu strony to proszę zająć się czymś poważnym, a dalsze kontynuowanie zakazanych praktyk może się zakończyć pernamentną blokadą, założoną przez jednego z administratorów.
Z poważaniem.
Edytor OpenStreetMap z Torunia :D
wkdgs (2023-10-22 15:46:57+00:00): Hi,

erstmal herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Bist du dir bei der Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkung siche und warst du vor Ort oder hast du eine andere Quelle? Ich bin mir nicht sicher, ob die 30 hier stimmt. Kannst du die 30 wieder rausnehmen, wenn du dir auch nicht sicher bist?

Zudem ist noch der Tag "maxspeed:type" mit dem Wert "DE:urban" eingetragen. Der besagt, dass hier 50 km/h erlaubt sind. Wenn die 30 stimmt, müsste der Tag auch angepasst werden.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:maxspeed:type

Gruß
wkdgs
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142782611
Nakaner-repair (2023-10-18 20:53:26+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 128946712, 128947305, 128947999, 128948329, 128996424.
i2004 (2023-10-19 09:59:51+00:00): te termine la 134
eggie (2023-10-19 05:41:34+00:00): Yep.. inderdaad dan disused:highway ...gebruiken in dit geval.
Fijne dag verder..
eggie
Glassman (2023-10-19 18:24:10+00:00): Can you also add in the service road to the boat launch?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142783018
limes11 (2023-10-18 21:39:11+00:00): Moin. 

"Altstadt" war auch nicht als Stadtteil (place=quarter) erfasst, sondern als Viertel (place=neighbourhood) ohne offizielle Bedeutung.

VG
Glassman (2023-10-19 18:31:34+00:00): Thanks for updating the city boundary. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142783938
OptikalCrow (2024-01-11 18:48:29+00:00): just FYI: when adding a stop sign as a node on the way, it should be tagged as highway=stop. traffic_sign=stop is for describing the actual sign itself, off the street.
OptikalCrow (2024-01-11 18:49:47+00:00): *edit: I see you're already using that way of tagging, I just saw these when investigating uses of traffic_sign=* in the area for QA work
blendergeek (2024-01-12 00:47:00+00:00): Thanks for the heads up. I added that stop sign with Vespucci (instead of ID). Vespucci must make weird tags. I'll look into fixing Vespucci so that it creates proper stop signs when on ways.
mueschel (2023-11-02 11:41:44+00:00): Hi,
what does "socket:UK" mean? Could you check the list of sockets in the Wiki and find the correct one?
Wookey (2023-11-02 13:31:07+00:00): I did actually read that list and couldn't find the UK one so put 'UK' as best effort. But I see it is in there really as bs1363 (but the image of a double domestic-type makes it easy to miss when I was looking for something more like https://electricaldiscountedsupplies.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/ADWP1SKT-Website-600x626.jpg)
Anyway, thanks for reminding me to come back to this. Glad to see someone is doing QC on all this charger info - it can be tricky to get right. Fixed now.
I might even update the wiki image too.
gileri (2023-10-22 20:38:42+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour la contribution !

Je vois qu'il y a le tag indoor=no pour ce défibrillateur, est-ce que indoor=yes ne serait pas plus adapté ?
gileri (2023-10-22 20:39:34+00:00): Mince après relecture de la location il a l'air d'être à l'extérieur, j'ai rien dit !
olimago (2023-10-23 20:04:21+00:00): Oui c'est délicat :p Parce qu'il est "à l'intérieur" c'est à dire au sous sol mais accessible depuis l'extérieur. J'ai mis "indoor=no" en me disant qu'il n'y a pas de porte pour y accéder mais je sais pas si c'est correct
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-19 11:06:55+00:00): dałem traffic_signals:vibration=broken by SC się nie pytało ponownie (i też by inne przetwarzanie potrafiło to ogarnąć)
algot (2024-03-05 18:13:38+00:00): Будь ласка, прочитайте що потрібно додавати в тег name і не додавайте туди неправильні значення

https://tinyurl.com/25mhbanp
Syl (2023-10-21 10:34:46+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé la modification de l'arrêt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9988485189
Il y a bien une poubelle à cet arrêt.
Filip009 (2023-10-27 15:50:55+00:00): Dobrý deň, viete o tom, že ste spojili do jedného bodu všetko, čo bolo na mieste k dispozícií? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11273283693/history
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-10-19 16:12:17+00:00): Hi, it's not enough to set an address, the node has to be actually moved to the new location or a new one should be created. Better to do that on https://www.openstreetmap.org than in OsmAnd. I've moved the shop to the new address and added shop=leather tag. See if it's correct. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6567873661
Kovoschiz (2023-10-18 23:09:54+00:00): Follow up /changeset/141631443,112412493,75309973,112892201,75239976
CRCulver (2024-12-10 16:11:02+00:00): Please do not add buildings:levels tags to objects like traffic lights. This is tagging for the renderer. The buildings:levels tag is only for buildings. There are other tags for denoting the height off the ground of other objects.

I would be grateful if you could do an Overpass API query for building:levels and highway=traffic_lights in order to remove all instances where you have made this incorrect tagging.
CRCulver (2024-12-11 11:08:25+00:00): Nevermind, I have done the Overpass API query myself and removed all your building:levels and height tags. Again, please learn what “tagging for the renderer” means and kindly refrain from it.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-30 01:58:33+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146844038
PengualaHeadphones (2023-10-28 12:43:12+00:00): Thank you very much.
Glassman (2023-10-19 18:25:39+00:00): #TIP: We spell out street names in OSM. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you please fix?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142786681
ovruni (2023-10-18 23:47:06+00:00): Hola, nuevamente se ha hecho mal todo, se han colocado nombres no relacionados sobre bancas y fuentes, por lo que he revertido sus conjuntos de cambios.
Saludos
literan (2023-10-19 17:30:41+00:00): дома подвинули, а дороги оставили, и теперь дороги проходят местами по домам.

я исправлю, но лучше, конечно, так не делать
MxxCon (2023-10-19 05:02:12+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete the two tags here? They appear to be correct according to the NYC DOB database.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142787255
VLD186 (2023-10-19 15:52:26+00:00): Hi MxxCon, thank you for your feedback. The two tags were removed from the building in this changeset because they were added to the building part that has these attributes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1216366860). I used Bing streetside and Bing Birds Eye to confirm the building levels on the other building part geometries I added here. These changes can be seen in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142734334
MxxCon (2023-10-19 16:35:44+00:00): However, as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part

"Where a building has been split into parts, a building outline has still to be drawn of the whole building way and should have the tags building:levels=* and height=*. These values should be the maximum of all the building parts. A building that has a three-story part and a six-story part is still a six-story building."

Your change doesn't seem to match what's documented..
VLD186 (2023-10-20 16:42:15+00:00): Hi MxxCon, thanks again for reaching out. Per OSM guidelines regarding the building:part key, it would appear that ‘building:levels’ and ‘height’ tags are both needed on the building outline. I have re-added those tags to the building (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142878945). Thank you for bringing this to my attention.
DUGA (2025-07-10 01:30:30+00:00): You "lit" edits are being reverted because they are literally nonsense and strongly opinionated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to reply.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-26 15:20:40+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11273373090/history has shop = fast_food that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=fast_food ? Is it amenity=fast_food ? If not, what this tag is intended to mean? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfast_food
kawah64 (2024-11-07 05:29:56+00:00): I made a mistake, I fixed it. Thank you!
aharvey (2023-10-19 10:58:24+00:00): I don't understand, why can't they be split as @Ds5rUy did? Are you saying the Bing imagery here is wrong or you just don't agree with the mapping done by @Ds5rUy based on the imagery?
Mlik Point (2023-10-19 20:57:25+00:00): That's why because of unconstructive edits, but I have reverted it to prevent abuse of splitting into two ways and change:lanes tag.
Ds5rUy (2023-10-20 01:54:31+00:00): I'm sorry, I haven't got the slightest clue what you are actually trying to say here. Would you please lay out in detail your reasoning and thoughts on this?
Mlik Point (2023-10-20 04:46:54+00:00): The reason is: It can't split into two ways, change:lanes tag also can't be added and turn:lanes seem to be incorrect. That's why it's unconstructive.
aharvey (2023-10-20 04:56:48+00:00): Can you please explain why they can't be split and why you can't tag change:lanes? They must be split for different change:lanes to be applied. Could you also respond about if you disagree that on the ground matches Bing or it's your interpretation of how dt should be mapped based on the Bing imagery.

A number of people on discord did raise issue with your revert, so it seems against the community consensus. Unless you can further justify, we'll restore back to the original and ask you don't further revert again otherwise we'll need to request your account be blocked
Ds5rUy (2023-10-20 05:02:00+00:00): Would you please substantiate your statements with any evidence that makes you believe that completely correct tagging following currently accepted best practices is incorrect? Or why you believe that a way can't be split into segments when different tags apply to them? Or why you categorically state that accepted and used tag can't be added?

And finally, why you believe that any of these misunderstandings on your part justify the rather extensive campaign of reverting other peoples valid work that you seem to have been on for a while, looking at your changeset history.

TIA.
Mlik Point (2023-10-20 05:11:53+00:00): That said: "We can't split into two ways, the change:lanes tag also can't be added and turn:lanes are incorrect". That needs to be stayed here and its unconstructive edit (vandalism).
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-20 06:08:38+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15186
Mlik Point (2023-10-20 06:46:32+00:00): This is invalid. First, the ways can't split into two. Second, the "change:lanes" can't be added and must not applied. Third and final, the "turn:lanes" is incorrectly advised. That's why I reverted the edit because of unconstructive edit (vandalism), and it must not be reverted again.
aharvey (2023-10-20 10:59:56+00:00): Sorry but just claiming this or that can't be done doesn't help with justification or other mappers understanding your motives. At this point there is a clear community consensus against your viewpoint, so the original state is being restored, please respect this.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 00:09:27+00:00): Again, what is your reasoning for "First, the ways can't split into two. Second, the "change:lanes" can't be added and must not applied. Third and final, the "turn:lanes" is incorrectly advised"?, as these are all perfectly valid options for mapping. & with regard to "it must not be reverted again", every time you change valid mapping for no proper reason, then, yes, it WILL be reverted! I urge you to join the conversation at https://discord.com/channels/413070382636072960/471231032645910529/1164819417700519976 where you can explain your actions.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 00:10:28+00:00): Sorry, hit send without signing my comment: Graeme Fitzpatrick, OSMF Data Working Group
Mlik Point (2023-10-21 00:43:12+00:00): That's because of recent abusing of splitting into two ways, "change:lanes" must not applied and "turn:lanes" is incorrect: "through|slight_left;through|through|through". It's unconstructive edit (possible vandalism).
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 01:00:42+00:00): Again, they are all valid. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn & https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:change
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-23 04:40:39+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142997670
Glassman (2023-10-19 18:34:55+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142788254
user_11609320 (2023-10-19 00:45:57+00:00): there is a number for this maintenance yard, I just can't find it, nor can i remember if it was 5 airport road or 200 airport road
Glassman (2023-10-19 18:35:06+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142788411
Glassman (2023-10-19 18:35:32+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142788411
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-19 01:00:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11273356758

Pozdrawiam! 🦀