piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2025-03-26 05:24:26+00:00): You glued the nodes of several buildings together: hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data in ID editor. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164092165
Gregory Peony (2025-03-26 05:26:39+00:00): The footprint I flagged envelopes multiple buildings. Each footprint should represent one building: use shadows and alternate imagery sources to determine where one ends and the other begins. In this area Bing is useful as an interpretation aid. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164092219
Gregory Peony (2025-04-14 21:30:56+00:00): This footprint is valid and appropriately squared, but has a westerly bias and is oversized.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164092259
Norbert Dichter (2025-03-25 19:38:03+00:00): Please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing ‘q’ on your keyboard.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164092314
Norbert Dichter (2025-03-25 19:39:49+00:00): A highway, a building or a border should not share nodes with each other or other features. When it happens accidentally, you can use the disconnect option ("D") in the iD editor to 'unglue' the nodes from each other (nodes that are shared are grey instead of white). To avoid it happening, hold the ALT key down while you are placing a node near another building, it will prevent nodes from snapping together.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164092314
Gregory Peony (2025-04-08 04:27:04+00:00): All the footprints you added here represent buildings but could be more accurate and should be squared (q). Thank you for your conribution; please keep mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164092379
NeisBot (2025-03-25 19:00:59+00:00): Hello Empanada_Mapillary, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1371290156
https://osm.org/way/1371290155

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=164092559
YomanNH (2025-03-26 07:07:25+00:00): Możesz wyjaśnić, dlaczego po raz kolejny usuwasz obiekty, żeby utworzyć je ponownie? Zapewne nie, bo nawet nie czytasz komentarzy, albo całkowicie je ignorujesz. Przypomnę ci tylko, że byłeś wielokrotnie informowany o tym, żeby nie robić takich rzeczy:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163875501
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163589498
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161222071
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161168328
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161167642
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155623946

Jak widać, co najmniej od pół roku dostajesz informacje o dokładnie tych samych błędach, ale zupełnie je ignorujesz i popełniasz je ponownie.
Adam Haba (2025-03-26 18:13:23+00:00): Usuwam je, ponieważ uważam, że łatwiej jest je zrobić od nowa niż układać je zgodnie z rzeczywistą geometrią, co zajęło by dwa razy więcej czasu.
YomanNH (2025-03-26 18:26:22+00:00): No to nie rób w ten sposób, bo usuwasz przez to historię edycji. Jest to złe podejście, o czym już wielu użytkowników ci pisało.
Adam Haba (2025-03-26 18:28:05+00:00): Nie dochodzą do mnie w większości te wiadomości.
Adam Haba (2025-03-26 18:28:45+00:00): Ale nie będę już tak robił,.
YomanNH (2025-03-26 18:34:56+00:00): Dostałeś kiedyś linka ze stroną, gdzie są komentarze pod twoimi zestawami zmian. Jeśli rzeczywiście masz jakiś problem z mailem, to zaglądaj tam regularnie.

Cieszę się, że chcesz się poprawić, ale nie uwierzę na słowo i będę sprawdzał.
Dimitar155 (2025-03-25 19:03:15+00:00): Пейките подлежат на проверка, не съм убеден че съм уцелил бройките и позициите им.
stasiu512 (2025-03-27 00:08:33+00:00): Cześć, aktualnie przez te drogi przechodzą główne potoki ruchu, i nie pełnią one funkcji _link. Zmianę wycofuję. Pozdrawiam.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164142762
silversurfer83 (2025-03-25 20:04:03+00:00): Gude :)

du hast hier einer Straße den Namen "kein Straßenschild" gegeben. Das ist eher ungünstig.

So lange die Straße noch nicht benannt ist, kannst du dies mit "note=noch kein Name vergeben" oder so kenntlich machen. Das Feld "name=*" ist nur für Namen vorgesehen, nicht für Beschreibungen (zB deine "Baustraße". Heißt sicher auch nicht so, oder?).
Ich empfehle bei Baugebieten mal die verschiedenen Hintergrundbilder durchzuschauen. Hier hast du zB die Liegenschaftskarte Hessen (ALKIS) zur Auswahl, die hilft weiter ;)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen

happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164093016
silversurfer83 (2025-03-25 20:08:33+00:00): Nächster kleiner Hinweis :)

wenn es ein Verkehrsberuhigter Bereich ist (highway=living_street) geben wir in DE keine Höchstgeschwindigkeit an. Diese ist impliziert und den dieversen Routinganbietern bekannt.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dliving_street
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164093091
spoiler (2025-03-26 08:42:40+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis
NeisBot (2025-03-25 19:18:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
NeisReview (2025-04-02 15:35:45+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164427274
Gregory Peony (2025-03-26 06:41:55+00:00): The building I flagged is in fact L shaped. Please modify residential areas to prevent them from overlapping with footprints.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164093496
Gregory Peony (2025-03-27 23:17:13+00:00): The two large footprints to the north are not valid because the envelope multiple buildings: map one building per footprint.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164093523
Gregory Peony (2025-04-12 16:58:42+00:00): Overall a good contribution. All footpritns are valid, and appropriately shaped, but could be more accurate. --- Footpritns should not share nodes with residential areas; the common beginer mapper mistakes videos on the missing maps youtube chanel will show you how to deal with that. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164093530
Nekoatthegates (2025-03-26 18:19:14+00:00): Correction: Source used was Mapillary; ESRI World Imagery.
Gregory Peony (2025-03-26 05:33:57+00:00): All footprints are valid but not accurate. All of these footprints should have been squared by pressing q after drawing accurately enough and tagging. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164093631
NeisBot (2025-03-25 19:27:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-04-02 15:38:28+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164177411
Gregory Peony (2025-04-22 22:32:39+00:00): Overall a good quality contribution. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164093812
Gregory Peony (2025-03-26 06:25:39+00:00): Please check this changeset (164093821) to see how I mapped this settlement https://osmcha.org/changesets/164106748?filters=%7B%22in_bbox%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%225.259705%2C13.321476%2C5.262451%2C13.324149%22%2C%22value%22%3A%225.259705%2C13.321476%2C5.262451%2C13.324149%22%7D%5D%2C%22area_lt%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A2%2C%22value%22%3A2%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%222024-11-18%22%2C%22value%22%3A%222024-11-18%22%7D%5D%2C%22comment%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%23hotosm-project-18084%20Mapping%20of%20buildings%20in%20Sokoto%2C%20Nigeria%20for%20%23msf%20%23missingmaps%20%23Sokoto24%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%23hotosm-project-18084%20Mapping%20of%20buildings%20in%20Sokoto%2C%20Nigeria%20for%20%23msf%20%23missingmaps%20%23Sokoto24%22%7D%5D%7D
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164093821
Gregory Peony (2025-04-09 20:35:00+00:00): Most of the footprints you added here are valid, accurate and appropriately squared. Some outline multiple buildings. Thanks for your contribution.
Gregory Peony (2025-04-09 20:44:29+00:00): The two lsmallest footprints here would more accurately be mapped as one round or rectangular building; zooming out provides a better perspective of shape and orientation.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 02:29:33+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164658060
stosh77 (2025-04-01 11:01:19+00:00): Revised.
Gregory Peony (2025-04-03 03:37:01+00:00): Most of the footprints here represent buildings visible in imagery, but they are not accurate and should be squared. Some footprints outline multiple buildings. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164094120
Gregory Peony (2025-04-03 02:30:49+00:00): Hi it looks like you've accidentally modified an admin boundary in this changeset. To avoid this you can filter out boundaries via the map features drop down in the map data panel of ID editor, or the filter window of JOSM. I've restored the geometry of the boundary in changeset 164444498. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future.
Gregory Peony (2025-03-25 22:39:47+00:00): A lot of the footprints you added here envelope multiple buildings. The objective when digitising buildings is to map their footpritn i.e. where the walls meet the ground. One area per building. Looking at shadows can help you spot where one building ends and the next begins. In the primary imagery source for this project shadows are cast NW. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164094182
Gregory Peony (2025-03-27 23:14:32+00:00): Hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164094184
Norbert Dichter (2025-03-25 19:53:20+00:00): Hi @IgnaceEt there are some issues with your mappings.

Do not forget to make buildings with rectangular corners: draw buildings as accurately as possible, without the shadows, then type 'Q'.

A highway, a building or a border should not share nodes with each other or other features. When it happens accidentally, you can use the disconnect option ("D") in the iD editor to 'unglue' the nodes from each other (nodes that are shared are grey instead of white). To avoid it happening, hold the ALT key down while you are placing a node near another building, it will prevent nodes from snapping together.

Thanks for mapping. Next time, you can improve by avoiding mapping several buildings as one building. Every building must be traced separately. Zoom in as close as possible to see the outline of the buildings, hit each corner of the building carefully. Look for shadows, open ground, changes in roof color and vegetation to differentiate buildings.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164094207
Gregory Peony (2025-07-26 01:06:31+00:00): Generally you identified buildings in imager but the footprints are inaccurate. After mapping buildings, please remember to square their corners. Most buildings have square corners because that's easy to build. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that the corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, use the `Q` key to square the corners. This [video about squaring features](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a guide. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164094227
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 03:29:02+00:00): These building footpritns are valid but inaccurate; they are generally oversized and should be squared (q).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164094244
Gregory Peony (2025-03-25 22:45:43+00:00): It appears that one of the building footprints here is triangular becasue you were strictly staying within the task boundaries. Thanks for sticking to the task boundaries, but If a building is mostly within your task area feel free to map the entire building footprint; otherwise it won't be accurate.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-25 19:53:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228268126

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Gregory Peony (2025-04-02 21:33:43+00:00): All but a few buildings here are valid though the footprints are inaccurate. The vast majority footprints here should be squared (q). The building I flagged is far too large. You should try to give your best guess as to the footprint of a building even when it is obscured, but this footprint is about twice as big as it should be. Checking bing imagery gives a good indication of an accurate size becasue it isn't obscured. ---Highways should not share nodes with buildings Hold alt in ID to prevent the creation of shared nodes. You can sheck out ID editing shortcuts here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Shortcuts Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164094341
NeisReview (2025-03-26 07:02:00+00:00): #NodeDragging

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for contributing to the map. I’ve reviewed your recent edits and noticed that at least one node of a way was moved. This can sometimes happen unintentionally, and it’s led to some unusual intersections or overlaps between street segments and other map elements.

Could you kindly confirm whether these changes were intentional or if they may have been made by mistake?

Thank you, and I look forward to your response!

---
https://osm.org/node/11949895068
Gregory Peony (2025-04-02 21:39:18+00:00): Most footprints here are valid though some outline gardens visible in imagery barriers like walls can trick you into thinking they're buildings becasue they also cast shadows. Buildings under construction tend to have more going on within the extertior walls. the reason that buildings overlap highways here is because the geomerties are not accurate e.g. the footprint is simply too big to allow the highway to pass. The correct way to address this issue is to make the geomerty accurate so that there is enough space for all of the features you can see. Adding a layer=-1 tag would suggest that the building you mapped is underground. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164094480
Gregory Peony (2025-07-25 21:26:24+00:00): Hi you identified square buildings in the imagery. Thet could be more accurate because they are generally oversized, have not been squared, and share nodes. Accurate footprints are important for population estimates and to prevent issues like data overlaps. See how I mapped some of these here https://osmcha.org/changesets/169477049 Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164094658
Hufkratzer (2025-03-26 21:32:34+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1371333129 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1371883625 are no horse riding centres (leisure=horse_riding); they are horse riding arenas which should be tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian) and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/854844204#map=19/51.451222/4.472089&layers=P (example)
Hufkratzer (2025-03-26 21:33:12+00:00): In JOSM you can use the preset for sport=equestrian to tag riding arenas.
FrankOverman (2025-03-26 21:37:29+00:00): OK, tnx: corrected ;)
Gregory Peony (2025-07-11 20:48:37+00:00): You correctly identified buildings but the footprints you digitise are inaccurate. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164094794
Gregory Peony (2025-04-02 21:42:07+00:00): Almost all buildings are valid. I recommend that you folow this procedure when mapping footprints. Add points based on the corners of the roof (can be a little smaller than the roof), tag, square (q), rotate (r) and scale (shift++/-).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164094815
Gregory Peony (2025-03-25 23:41:35+00:00): The western footprint envelopes multiple buildings and shares nodes with a highway. The Eastern featue is a barrier. You can tell becasue of the shadows it casts. Please check changeset https://osmcha.org/changesets/164100764?filters=%7B%22in_bbox%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%225.324249%2C13.094192%2C5.326995%2C13.096198%22%2C%22value%22%3A%225.324249%2C13.094192%2C5.326995%2C13.096198%22%7D%5D%2C%22area_lt%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A2%2C%22value%22%3A2%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%222024-11-18%22%2C%22value%22%3A%222024-11-18%22%7D%5D%2C%22comment%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%23hotosm-project-18084%20Mapping%20of%20buildings%20in%20Sokoto%2C%20Nigeria%20for%20%23msf%20%23missingmaps%20%23Sokoto24%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%23hotosm-project-18084%20Mapping%20of%20buildings%20in%20Sokoto%2C%20Nigeria%20for%20%23msf%20%23missingmaps%20%23Sokoto24%22%7D%5D%7D to see how I mapped it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164094833
eggie (2025-03-25 20:34:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
grzegorz75jan (2025-04-03 06:27:20+00:00): Wycofuję przez kolejne połączenie lasu z drogami oraz granicą i to gęsto.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164448595
Gregory Peony (2025-07-26 00:03:12+00:00): Building footpritns whould represent one building. After mapping buildings, please remember to square their corners. Most buildings have square corners because that's easy to build. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that the corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, use the `Q` key to square the corners. This [video about squaring features](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a guide.
Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164094959
Norbert Dichter (2025-03-25 20:59:09+00:00): Hi @victor1397 there are some issues with your mappings.

Do not forget to make buildings with rectangular corners: draw buildings as accurately as possible, without the shadows, then type 'Q'.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164095006