piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
streckenkundler (2023-09-11 13:53:08+00:00): Hei,
also bei deinem ersten JOSM-Edit und mit Relationen hast du alles richtig gemacht! Gratulation und beide Daumen hoch!

Anmerkung zur Route Großkoschen - Hosena... Ich kann mir vorstellen, daß das mal die Basis-Route für deine jetzige Erfassung war... Wenn diese Route so nicht mehr ausgeschildert ist, kann man sich überlegen diese ganz zu entfernen.  (eigentlich hättest du diese auch für deine jetzige Erfassung nachnutzen können).

Die Seite https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=3794522&type=relation&map=14.0/51.4713/14.0522 kennst du?

Zir Datennutzung in Brandenburg sei dir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brandenburg/Geoportal sehr empfohlen. Da sind die wichtigsten der nutzbaren LGB-Daten gelistet.

Viele Grüße aus dem Spreewald,

Sven
Shulcare (2023-09-11 21:43:00+00:00): Ok schön, danke :-)
Ich hab mich nicht getraut die alte Route (Großkoschen - Hosena) zu löschen, weil ich nicht sicher weiß, ob das vielleicht doch irgendein anderer offizieller Pfad ist. Jedenfalls habe ich mehrere Schilder mit dem gelben Balken an Stellen gesehen, die definitv nicht mit der bisherigen Eintragung übereinstimmen. Und dessen Notiz "teilweise sehr schlechte Ausschilderung" klingt für mich, als wäre der ursprüngliche Eintrager ein paar mal falsch abgebogen und hat deswegen nur wenige Schilder gesehen(?)
Beim Geoportal-Link verstehe ich nur Bahnhof, das ist weit über meinem Kenntnisstand...
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-10 22:10:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400915209

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Yankowsky (2023-09-15 08:56:37+00:00): Hej, wszystkie pobliskie adresy na wsi mają nazwę miejscowości w addr:street. Może jest możliwość maszynowej poprawy wszystkich adresów? Bo obecny stan wygląda na stary lub błędny sposób edycji.
NorthCrab (2023-09-15 15:55:18+00:00): Oki!
NorthCrab (2023-09-15 15:59:05+00:00): Overpass turbo w okolicy wypluł tylko 8 przypadków, możliwe że już poprawiłeś? https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Axm Poprawie je ręcznie
Yankowsky (2023-09-28 18:12:51+00:00): Ok, dzięki!
MxxCon (2023-09-14 08:19:47+00:00): Hello.
When this quest asks you for the street name you can just tap on that street and the name will be automatically filled in. You don't have to manually type it.
If you do want to type it in, please make sure not to use abbreviations but full expand all words. In this name is "St" means Saint or Street? If you fully spell it out there's no ambiguity.👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141083499
Woazboat (2023-09-11 16:18:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1125961871/history

Hi, der Weg hier war als virtuelle Verbindung für ein korrektes/sinnvolles Fußgängerrouting eingetragen. Wenn Gehsteige separat von der Straße mittels eigener Wege gemappt sind ist das teilweise notwendig um die möglichen Verbindungs- und Überquerungspunkte abbilden zu können da OSM technisch leider keine gute Unterstützung für parallel verlaufende Wege wie z.b. Gehsteige hat zwischen denen man in der Realität an jeder beliebigen Stelle hin und her wechseln könnte. 
Für diese virtuellen Verbindungswege gibt es den footway=link Tag (der hier in diesem Fall auch gesetzt war) um sie unterscheiden zu können. 
Bei Kreuzungen endet der Gehsteig ja genau genommen eigentlich auch an der Fahrbahnkante und führt nicht durchgängig über die Straße hinweg, aber dennoch sollten die Wege über den 'nicht existenten' Teil auf der Fahrbahn hinweg verbunden werden um ein sinnvolles Wegnetz zu erhalten.
Wege dieser Art sollten aus diesem Grund bitte nicht entfernt werden.

lg, Woazboat


Siehe auch:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:footway#Common_values

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Tag:footway%3Dlink
HellMap (2023-09-11 17:46:50+00:00): Čau!

Gribēju pārliecināties par izmaiņu uz - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384789214 - vai tur tagad ir noņemtas zīmes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9904986879 un https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9904986878 -https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1177625996439493&focus=photo , https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=149661014420479&focus=photo
artuuurs (2023-09-11 18:51:30+00:00): Sveiciens labākajam mapperim! Jā, zīmes ir noņemtas.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-12 00:59:54+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141138196
TreeTracks (2023-09-11 07:57:45+00:00): Great work getting the new cycle path on OSM so quickly. Thanks for all your superb additions in Albury-Wodonga and further afield. Best wishes Ian
user_11609320 (2023-09-11 00:08:54+00:00): the farms are private property. the federal government has been trying to buy it since 2014 in a land swap 
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/45689
❤️‍🔥 (2023-09-11 08:09:49+00:00): Hi, what source did you use for this edit? On mapillary imagery, the speed limit is 80km/h: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=273663704494371&focus=photo

I belive the speed limit was changed 5 years ago. See https://nzta.govt.nz/projects/sh60-speed-limit-consultation
LockOnGuy (2023-09-11 00:50:01+00:00): Hi ڕاستی,              
I see in this changeset you have edited node 5078731330, and you previously deleted name:ar from it, which is a correct name, see: https://www.facebook.com/roshnbery.polyclinic/        
Node history:      
https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/5078731330               
Can you restore the correct name:ar you deleted?        
Regards.
MxxCon (2023-09-14 08:25:07+00:00): Hello.
When extracting POI from buildings with iD, please pay attention to keep nycdoitt:bin= tag with the building, not node. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141085550
user_5359 (2023-09-11 08:30:36+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1206747222, https://www.osm.org/way/1206746856, https://www.osm.org/way/1206746857. What is the mean of the tags
Nome=Testada_Indefinida
SHAPE_Leng=48.1316507548
TipoDivisa=2
tipoDelimF=5
PatrickySS (2023-09-11 19:28:57+00:00): I forgot to remove these tags, thanks for letting me know <3
ikopanjirukmana (2023-09-14 02:41:40+00:00): Hallo zunairoh,
saya ingin mengkonfirmasi dari data yang kamu tambahkan. apakah bangunan apartemen ini sudah selesai di bangun? atau masih dalam tahap rencana? karena saya liat di citra satelit yang ada di OSM lokasi ini masih tanah kosong

Terima kasih
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141085816
rowcherryrow (2023-09-29 20:00:19+00:00): Hello, ryunezm!
I am reaching out about some overlapping highways (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96324479, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96391672, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/555079809, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96070542, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/806217250) I noticed when running a validation around Cartagena de Indias.
Whenever there are validation warnings regarding overlapping highways, we ideally want to either remove the overlapping highways or add appropriate layer, bridge, or tunnel tags. This page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer demonstrates how to add appropriate layer tags. Additionally, this page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Validator identifies potential validation warnings, which includes a section on overlapping highways. Furthermore, this page https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/becoming-a-power-mapper/fixing-common-mapping-issues/ shows how to run a validator in JOSM. I hope this information was helpful for your future editing efforts in OSM.
Have a wonderful day, and happy mapping!
DUGA (2025-01-01 16:01:12+00:00): Any valid reason to spam dog/cat/horse whatever animal access on the sidewalk? I think canada geese as well as black bear are also good here.

Is there any legal sign saying "yes" to them?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206750316#map=17/41.050978/-76.220473
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 03:17:26+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353716
canfe (2023-11-16 17:33:12+00:00): Il name non può essere cascata, sennò ogni panchina avrebbe come name panchina, i pali avrebbero palo...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141086643
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-23 07:01:52+00:00): DWG revert - unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173658295
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:12:24+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353060
nevw (2023-09-11 01:52:16+00:00): Walshpool Creek is sign posted where it crosses Eidsvold-Theodore Road. It appears incorrectly named Lower Creek in the GA dataset. A section of Lower Creek was also miss-named Springer Creek. Their were two unconnected sections named Lower Creek in the dataset. By renaming part of Springer creek I was able to make Lower Creek continuous. This also aligns with how Lower Creek is depicted on the BOM catchment map
http://www.bom.gov.au/qld/flood/brochures/burnett/map.shtml
nevw (2023-09-11 01:56:17+00:00): This changeset also uploaded the following tributaries of Lower Creek...
 Black Soil Gully,Brickyard Gully, Little Mallar Creek, Mallar Creek and Sawpit Gully.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:54:02+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353486
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 03:04:29+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353595
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:24:12+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353186
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:20:04+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353142
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-23 07:01:53+00:00): DWG revert - unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173658295
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:12:25+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353060
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:54:03+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353486
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-11 05:53:17+00:00): Why you keep adding opening_hours:covid19 to this object?
marc__marc (2023-09-12 09:26:18+00:00): Hello,
can you please :
use good changeset comment, for example: "importing data from the ABC database" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
use changeset to describe it's an automated import ( import=yes) and link to the wiki page that describe this import ?
Thanks,
Marc
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:20:05+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353142
tastrax (2023-09-11 06:14:29+00:00): Is this actually a real place or just a personal marker?
tastrax (2023-09-13 08:43:31+00:00): Changing the name doesn't answer the original question - is this just a personal marker?
tastrax (2023-09-13 08:55:15+00:00): I have removed this and turned it into a note for your own reference
NetworkingTas (2023-09-13 10:25:29+00:00): Thank you, Just a personal reference of keeping an eye on a trail
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-23 07:01:54+00:00): DWG revert - unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173658295
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-09-13 23:05:14+00:00): alpine hut?
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:54:04+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353486
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:11:08+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353035
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-23 07:01:55+00:00): DWG revert - unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173658295
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:46:45+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353427
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:46:46+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353427
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 03:04:30+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353595
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:11:09+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353035
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:46:47+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353427
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-23 07:01:56+00:00): DWG revert - unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173658295
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 02:41:39+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173697602
user_5359 (2023-09-26 07:19:15+00:00): Hello! The key course_name (not court-name mentioned in the change set comment) is a duplicate information. The name is part of the leisure=golf_couse. Please reduce the information overflow.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:46:48+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353427
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:20:06+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353142
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 02:41:40+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173697602
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:11:10+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353035
Kovoschiz (2023-09-11 05:19:52+00:00): This is actually for the larger `boundary=administrative` it is naming. There is another item for this location.
真空中的球形猫 (2023-09-11 08:08:59+00:00): (For futher information: I noticed this in https://t.me/OSM_cultural/15/1220 )
Kovoschiz (2023-09-11 08:34:15+00:00): The other one looks correct (I'm not using Telegram)
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:36:05+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365480
HikeAndMap (2023-09-24 09:39:10+00:00): Hi Timmy - why is there still a "no straight on" restriction?

I think there shouldn't be any restriction there
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 02:41:41+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173697602
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:46:49+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353427
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:35:53+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365473
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:44:23+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353388
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 03:04:31+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353595
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 02:41:42+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173697602
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:44:24+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353388
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:11:11+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353035
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:35:45+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365472
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 02:41:43+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173697602
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:20:07+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353142
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:44:25+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353388
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:09:14+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353015
Ciblia (2023-09-11 04:28:53+00:00): Vuokrasopimus päättyy, tilan tyhjennys käynnissä. Paperilla Piraattipuolue poistui kauemman aikaa sitten ja tilassa toimi Teknologia avoimeksi ry.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 02:41:44+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173697602
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 02:59:15+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173697827
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:44:26+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353388
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 02:59:16+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173697827
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:57:47+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353532
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:09:15+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353015
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:44:27+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353388
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:16:38+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353108
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:57:48+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353532
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:41:45+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353352
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:16:39+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353108
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:41:46+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353352
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 02:59:17+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173697827
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:09:16+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353015
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:16:40+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353108
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:57:49+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353532
Udarian (2023-09-16 07:18:43+00:00): from what I can tell traffic signals should not have toll information on them, like what would that even mean, that there's a camera on it, then there is specific tagging for that and thus should be used over toll=yes. also what is the source for this.
clay_c (2023-09-23 16:07:11+00:00): These are not toll roads. Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141651612
clay_c (2023-09-23 16:07:17+00:00): These are not toll roads. Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141651612
clay_c (2023-09-23 16:07:19+00:00): These are not toll roads. Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141651612
clay_c (2023-09-23 16:07:21+00:00): These are not toll roads. Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141651612
eggie (2023-09-11 15:16:03+00:00): Dag jp  Een highway=footway is een wandelpad. (NL:G7 bord) Daar mag je niet fietsen. 
Een highway=path staat wel open voor fietsers. Welk bord staat er vooraan? 
Kunnen auto's niet om de parkeerplaats heenrijden?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-11 15:26:00+00:00): https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/gmb-2023-310405.html
eggie (2023-09-11 15:35:26+00:00): Ik heb highway=residential weer teruggezet confoprm verkeersbesluit. Er staan paaltjes en een C1 bord.
Dus vehicle=no
horse=no
Met onderbord uitzonderingen voor tweewielers.

Wanneer er iets heel anders is gekomen (G7 bord?) laat maar weten. 
MVG
eggie
jpajs (2023-09-11 17:37:41+00:00): https://photos.app.goo.gl/D4ZBQvzNJRE8fRQB9
eggie (2023-09-11 18:02:46+00:00): Oke.. bedankt voor de foto's... 
Het is conform het verkeersbesluit uitgevoerd en door mij aangepast.
Het zal straks niet meer routeren voor motorvoertuigen.
Er zijn ook nog in de straat  D4 borden geplaatst.. maar die hoeven we niet te mappen. De paaltjes en de tagging houden motorvoertuigen tegen.
Mvg
eggie
Langlaeufer (2023-09-11 05:22:43+00:00): Du hast recht. Ist da wirklich diese Auffahrt für Radfahrer? Bei mir standen da gerade 2 LKW so dass ich dort nichts gesehen habe.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141090683
Nadjita (2023-09-11 05:27:43+00:00): Das weiß ich nicht. Vor dem Neubau ar da eine, aber seitdem war ich nicht mehr da. Ich hab ja auch nur access angepasst. Heute schaffe ich's auch nicht mehr dorthin, ist komplett ab vom Schuss.
Langlaeufer (2023-09-11 05:53:59+00:00): Ich weiß was du geändert hast ;). Mit der Auffahrt wollte ich nur wissen ob du da zufällig weist.
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-07 00:01:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143714106, 143714111 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits eines users nach selbstlöschung
clay_c (2023-09-23 16:07:24+00:00): These are not toll roads. Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141651612
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:35:36+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365470
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:35:31+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365466
osmviborg (2023-09-11 05:49:26+00:00): Stien langs den sydlige del af Søndersø er ikke 'designated' cykelsti.
clay_c (2023-09-23 16:07:26+00:00): These are not toll roads. Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141651612
trigpoint (2023-09-13 15:32:08+00:00): Hi
What is the source you are using for these edits. An urban primary road isn't going to have a toll so I am unsure how this improves routing.

Cheers Phil
Maneesh-Mahlawat (2023-09-15 05:44:47+00:00): Yes, it is a mistake that Ganesh Bhardwaj made. I talked to the user. Thank you for reverting this change
trigpoint (2023-09-15 07:36:49+00:00): Thank you, however their profile is still not compliant with organised editing guidelines.
Maneesh-Mahlawat (2023-09-15 12:57:05+00:00): I agree. I am trying to fix that
Udarian (2023-09-16 07:08:00+00:00): I am a little confused here, Maneesh Mahlawat you said "Thank you for reverting this change" yet this data is still there, who reverted what, I dont see any such reverts.
trigpoint (2023-09-17 10:23:21+00:00): I never said I reverted the change.

I suspect that all edits by this group of mappers need to be reverted as they have made so many errors. I feel it is unlikely that the US community will have missed things like toll tags.
clay_c (2023-09-23 16:07:29+00:00): These are not toll roads. Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141651612
osmviborg (2023-09-11 06:05:17+00:00): Nej. Stien er ikke skiltet således. Desuden er den på visse steder alt for smal til begge kategorier.
clay_c (2023-09-23 16:07:31+00:00): These are not toll roads. Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141651612
Frans S (2023-09-11 13:37:35+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Please tag the highways in accordance with the highway wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Morocco#How_tagging_the_places?
Best regards


Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141092719
AndyB_66 (2025-09-24 19:16:41+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
pio2_122 (2023-09-11 10:46:43+00:00): „Nazwy powinny być ograniczone do nazwy obiektu i nie powinny zawierać: kategorii, typów, opisów, adresów, uwag. Jeśli coś nie ma nazwy, to nie dodajemy jej.”
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy#Nazwa_jest_tylko_nazw%C4%85
julcnx (2024-04-24 08:38:17+00:00): Hey, welcome to OSM and thanks for your contributions! I noticed you've marked some roads as 'living_street.' One tip for future edits: you should tag these as 'highway=residential' instead. This is because there aren't any rules in Thailand that specifically lower speed limits or give pedestrians priority in residential areas. You can read more about this on the Thailand wiki. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Cheers, Julien
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Urban_and_Local_Road_wide_enough_for_motor_cars
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141093437
huifan (2023-09-11 06:57:54+00:00): 應該把這條路分割  讓道路速限設定更準確
Supaplex (2023-09-13 06:14:59+00:00): 分界點與時速各是多少？
Udarian (2023-09-16 06:58:27+00:00): before this was committed it had toll=no, what source do have as to that changing.