piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
berndw (2023-01-21 08:43:24+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Vielen Dank, dass Du zur Verbesserung der Daten beiträgst, aber ich habe eine Frage.

Was ist mit diesem Knoten, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/296337062 , kann man den entfernen?

Für Fragen stehe ich gerne zur Verfügung
Forke21 (2023-01-21 16:32:09+00:00): Hi,

Danke für den Hinweis, diesen Punkt muss ich komplett übersehen haben. Habe jetzt meinen Punkt entfernt und den bestehenden aktualisiert. (meiner war auch noch auf dem falschen Gebäude)
berndw (2023-01-21 17:53:05+00:00): Ich habe das Rathaus vergrößert, aber in der ganzen Umgebung müsste einiges aktualisiert werden.

Man könnte z.B. die Adressen erfassen, die scheinen sehr lückenhaft, außerdem fehlt einges an Gebäuden.

Möchtest Du das machen?
Palolo (2023-01-14 17:18:07+00:00): We appreciate the help mapping, but it appears that you created these buildings by copy/paste. Please go back and trace each building accurately. Rushing does not make the mapping go faster. Thank you
Carto'Cité (2023-04-17 17:38:47+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai corrigé quelques pistes qui sont en fait des voies vertes. On voit plusieurs panneaux ici et là comme sur cette photo : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=743324089669618
N’hésite pas à me contacter si tu as des questions :)
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
darkonus (2023-01-15 11:17:30+00:00): I reverted this changeset due to incorrect data
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131259705
Falsernet (2023-05-01 20:02:22+00:00): Is this only accessible privately, or is it just privately owned? If it's just privately owned operator:type=private may be more appropriate, as access tags represent whether access is allowed.
Dodko (2023-01-14 16:38:45+00:00): building=house je značka pre dvojdom alebo radovú zástavbu.
Ak je to samostatný rodinný dom použite building=detached
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:building%3Ddetached
Frans S (2023-01-27 17:06:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark about tagging of highways as track.
As you can read on this wiki page
a track is only to be used between settlements and farmland, woods and waterways as a local destination
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa

Best regards
gscholz (2023-01-20 06:33:57+00:00): Hi Grannymeg,
this changeset has again created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=80.26459&lat=6.84027&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131260110

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Frans S (2023-01-14 11:44:13+00:00): Hello Tony, A remark.
Please don't tag highways in rural areas, like here, as residential. Just unclassified, or when it is a direct access to a farm, as service road.
Best regards
eggie (2023-01-14 11:37:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-01-14 11:40:03+00:00): Dag Ivo  Geen gebouwomtrek gebruiken om op bij te taggen, maar de al aanwezige adresnode. 
In OSM Nederland hebben we adresnode-import vanuit het Kadaster.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-01-14 11:41:42+00:00): Dag Ivo Er staat no steeds adres en bedrijfsinfo op de gebouw omtrek.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131261031
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-01-14 11:42:54+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast
Larmax (2023-01-14 11:43:58+00:00): *in Vahto
wombatmaper (2023-01-14 11:58:56+00:00): Ich hab das entfernen des nightclubs mal abgespallten in einen seperaten edit:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131261861
skyper (2023-01-14 15:44:14+00:00): Hallo DilanKoyunoglu,
woher hast Du die Informationen? Warst Du vor Ort? Dürfen wir die Webseiten für OSM verwenden?
Ich sehe Dich nur Car-Sharing-Stellplätze bearbeiten, machst Du das in Deiner Freizeit oder wirst Du dafür bezahlt? Bei letzterem solltest Du das zumindest in Deinem Profil kenntlich machen.
Generell sehen die Änderungen nach mechanischen Änderungen aus und sollten somit im Vorhinein besprochen werden (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct).
Wie schon in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131229982 erwähnt sind Adressen hier falsch.

Fragende Grüße,
skyper
DilanKoyunoglu (2023-01-15 20:04:02+00:00): Dear Skyper,

Thanks for your comments. For these points, I got the information from the website of Grüne-Flotte. I didn’t find anything on their website that indicates that I am not allowed to use it (https://gruene-flotte.com/impressum/).

I am mapping for an open-source project (https://www.open-accessibility.org/). We are collecting car and bike sharing locations in different regions in Germany to make some statistical analysis. Therefore, we are looking at the official websites of the cities and counties, as well as the car and bike sharing providers. If possible, we do quality checks by looking at aerial and street-view images to verify the position. So theoretically, I am usually having more than one source for the objects I am mapping. So far, we didn’t have any issues with that. But please let me know in case there is something wrong here.

I am only mapping manually, not automated, in order to make sure that there are no duplicates or faults.

Thanks for the hint regarding the addresses! I will not add them in the future.

Best,

Dilan
skyper (2023-01-16 11:05:48+00:00): Hi Dilan,
thanks for the answer.
I fear we do not have the right to use information of many websites. In case of this change, at the bottom of the webpages I read "© 2022 GRÜNE FLOTTE". Additionally, I doubt that you can judge the capacity from quite old aerial images and, please, mention all used sources in the CS.
Despite your workflow, this still looks like an import in my eyes and should be documented on the OSM wiki. I still do not know if you are paid for your work. Never the less mentioning the project in your profile would be helpful.
By the way, do not use abbreviations as values (`name=Station Auwaldstr.`).

Overall, the addresses should be removed but probably all the CSs need to be reverted anyway.

All the best,
skyper
DilanKoyunoglu (2023-01-17 14:35:39+00:00): Dear skyper,

Thanks for your reply. We just got in contact with the operators from Grüne Flotte and asked them if they give us the permission to map the locations. I will wait for their answer before adding further locations of this operator. 

About the documentation in the wiki page, we have documented our work here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GOAT_(Geo_Open_Accessibility_Tool). Are you missing any specific information?

Thanks for the hint on the abbreviations. I will make sure to not use them in the future. Also, I  removed the address from all my carsharing edits. 

Best,

Dilan
skyper (2023-01-18 13:54:28+00:00): Dear Dilan,
thanks for the updates and the link. How about adding your project to the list on the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue#Ongoing_Imports,_Semi-Automated)?
Thumbs up for asking for permission. It is useful to document the process under https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Permissions and once granted also under https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Germany.

I fear "Grüne Flotte" is only one example and asking for permission is needed for most if not all websites your are using.

Regards,
skyper
DilanKoyunoglu (2023-01-19 17:18:34+00:00): Dear Skyper,
thanks for sending these links. About the list of semi-automated imports I am not sure, as they seam to use more automation as we do. We added the process of the permission in the wiki and will add it to the contributors page as soon as we heard back from them. Also, we will double check the sources of the other carsharing operators.

Best,

Dilan
skyper (2023-01-29 14:52:06+00:00): Dear Dilan,
as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131327718 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129080480 show you do add features without on the ground proof. You import data therefore your edits well deserve the status of a semi-automated import.

All the best,
skyper
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-01-19 04:18:38+00:00): Hvad er https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1131938926
?
Det skal have et fysisk tag
Opspin (2023-01-19 08:04:23+00:00): Det er sand/grus givetvis så hunde har et sted at besørge, jeg ved ikke hvordan det skal tagges korrekt.
kapazao (2023-01-14 14:11:59+00:00): Hola, por favor revisa los caminos que añadiste para desconectalos del gasoducto y conectarlos a los caminos necesarios, ya que no tiene sentido esa conexión con el gasoducto.
Un saludo y gracias por tus contribuciones
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131262603
user_5359 (2023-01-14 12:45:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course
IlBano (2023-01-15 16:14:08+00:00): Ciao Fra00.
La rampa che comprende questa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1131943144 in che senso va percorsa ? Al momento è composta da 3 way, ma con direzione di marcia non uniforme.
Hai modo di controllare?
Grazie

IlBano
jeslop (2023-01-14 15:20:05+00:00): Hola km2701.

Mira esto: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
NorthCrab (2023-01-14 14:52:07+00:00): Wielkie dzięki !
:-} (2023-01-14 15:07:52+00:00): Nie ma sprawy
ivanbranco (2023-01-14 16:01:15+00:00): Seems like this tag also is from Garmin? https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/catmp-RoadID#overview
Friendly_Ghost (2023-01-14 16:09:32+00:00): Most likely, and https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=PFM too. Marc Zoutendijk is now in contact with people from the CATMP project. If he concludes that these tags are equally irrelevant in OSM, these tags shall also be deleted.
Patrickov (2023-01-15 00:19:54+00:00): Next time do not use one edit over such a large area.  Thanks.
woodpeck (2023-01-15 17:01:54+00:00): Casper, if the DWG concludes that tags should be removed then the DWG will remove these tags. If DWG members privately say that they think soemething is useless, that is NOT sufficient reason to delete whatever that is without any community consultation.
Friendly_Ghost (2023-01-15 18:08:17+00:00): Thank you, Frederik. I am already in contact with Marc Zoutendijk and with SomeoneElse about this, and all statements were made in a public Discord server with a few thousand members in it.
woodpeck (2023-01-16 12:33:09+00:00): That is not the issue. The issue is that you have taken something that these DWG members have said in a private capacity and used it to support an un-discussed mass change in OSM. Personally, there's a ton of things in OSM that I find useless, and every now and then I will say that in a discussion, but this would not be a reason for anyone to go out deleting the stuff because "DWG member woodpeck said so". Do you understand the difference?
Friendly_Ghost (2023-01-16 12:42:24+00:00): I do understand the difference. That said, I went out and checked the data, I looked at the documentation, I confirmed that it was indeed useless and then I deleted it. Isn't that what you're supposed to do with useless data?
Friendly_Ghost (2023-01-16 13:07:11+00:00): Marc Zoutendijk himself had already suggested that he would do the cleanup. I simply beat him to it.
SomeoneElse (2023-01-16 13:30:42+00:00): @Friendly_Ghost Quoting myself directly from Discord: "Not that there's any point in having garmin_type in OSM, but equally removing it does nothing useful either."
Are you being a pillock for a hobby or do you see it as some sort of long-term career?
Please don't misrepresent people's views like this.
On the subject of the data, I suggested that you might want to discuss whether the automatic removal of this data by editors was or was not a good idea.  That would still be the best way forward, but it would require you to act as part of a community rather than someone who "thinks that the always know best", despite having relatively little experience of this sort of thing.  
This isn't the first time you've got into trouble for this attitude:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Friendly_Ghost/blocks and it's a shame that you don't seem to be learning.
Friendly_Ghost (2023-01-16 13:50:35+00:00): For completeness I'm sharing this quote from Marc Zoutendijk to Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-13) here: "Recently I did quite a lot of mass removal (for the DWG) of those garmin_type tags. They seem to be leftovers from some undocumented imports.  garmin_road_class and garmin_type can (and should!) be removed. They don't have any in function in OSM whatsoever.
Do you want me to do the cleanup or do you?"
MoiraPrime (2023-01-16 22:56:56+00:00): I think your time would be better spent fixing map errors and adding missing data to the map, rather than picking random harmless tags to remove across the entire world and making everyone angry.
Patrickov (2023-01-15 00:19:42+00:00): Next time do not use one edit over such a large area.  Thanks.
Frans S (2023-01-14 13:15:33+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
roads, giving access to houses/farms are never to be tagged as track. See the wiki about tagging highways.
Here, service or just unclassified are better tags.
==================

Hello, I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions. Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date. Most of the traces of roads in rural areas needs to be mapped as track when they only give access to farmland etc.
In general when highways connects settlements, buildings and villages use the tag unclassified, when you are mapping in a rural environment
Please focus on highways which connects isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and bigger. https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/
 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway --- 

You tube video Intro mapping roads.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzZWur1YG1k
Patrickov (2023-01-15 00:19:39+00:00): Next time do not use one edit over such a large area.  Thanks.
Zaneo (2023-01-15 12:24:27+00:00): Why? This is a logically grouped change set.

Next time please view the bounding box with a better tool, is an equally valid response.
MxxCon (2023-01-17 05:35:58+00:00): There are no better tools to view bounding box more accurately.
Friendly_Ghost (2023-01-17 11:50:51+00:00): If you want to know what other mappers edited in your local area recently, you can use an Overpass query that looks a bit like https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1qeO
scai (2023-02-20 14:36:56+00:00): Hi dieg0,
gleiche Situation wie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131818501. Gehört die Toilette zum Kügelgenhaus? Dann wäre access=customers angebracht. Und eigentlich reicht dann ebenso ein toilets=yes am Museum anstatt diesem separaten POI.

Grüße
Alex
rab (2023-01-14 14:24:43+00:00): not a building:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1131948212/history
please compare with bing imagery

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dtailings_pond
trigpoint (2023-01-14 13:51:50+00:00): The passenger train are operated by TFW, but are the tracks? 
I would not expect the signallers to be employed by network rail.

Cheers Phil
LukeAW (2023-01-14 13:59:12+00:00): Yes it's a bit confusing but the trains are operated by transport for Wales rail, this is a subsidiary of transport for Wales the Welsh government transport org who own the core valley lines from just west of Cardiff Queen Street all the way up. (And also to a bit West of ninian park).
map per (2023-01-16 20:46:33+00:00): Hallo dorkav,

der "RedCupShop / ABOVO" Laden den du eingezeichnet hast sieht ungewöhnlich aus. Sind das zwei Läden? Oder hat RedCup Abovo ersetzt?

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
dorvak (2023-01-17 06:27:59+00:00): Hi Map Per,

Das ist in der Tat etwas unklar. Der Laden gehört zum Unternehmen Abovo und führt Produkte aus dem Redcupshop und von Abovo, auf der Website wird er als Laden „Redcupshop/Abovo“ bezeichnet, daher habe ich das übernommen. https://redcupshop.com/pages/red-cups-kaufen-muenchen-maxvorstadt

Lg

Dorvak
map per (2023-01-17 07:01:33+00:00): Ok, danke.
Weißt du zufällig ob außen am Laden auch Abovo angeschrieben ist oder ob da nur Redcupshop steht?
dorvak (2023-01-19 06:56:01+00:00): Habe nachgeschaut: Auf dem Schild steht nur „Redcupshop“ 

Lg
map per (2023-01-20 16:07:55+00:00): Danke, hab den Namen jetzt in RedCupShop ohne den Abovo Zusatz geändert
CoyKoi (2023-01-15 03:30:00+00:00): Te Araroa Trail is captured as a route relation, because it encompasses many different features. It should not be put in the name field of individual features.

See the relevant route relation here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9581607
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131264876
eggie (2023-01-16 21:01:10+00:00): Dag JT  Je hebt het water verwijderd aan de westzijde van de sluis.
Nu is er niets meer.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-01-16 21:03:49+00:00): Water hersteld
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131264978
eggie (2023-01-16 21:06:46+00:00): Die vispassage lijkt me oke. 
Groet
eggie
NorthCrab (2023-01-15 02:43:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413796517
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304258726

Jesteś pewny co do adresu tego budynku? Bo jest to duplikat z budynku poniżej. Pozdrawiam!
VNT974 (2023-01-14 13:34:37+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/hexatrek-ameliorer-ou-supprimer/11598/21
tolioalessandro (2023-11-10 14:15:59+00:00): Ciao,
una corsia ciclabile non è fisicamente separata dalla strada, pertanto non va disegnato un segmento a sè stante ma va semplicemente aggiunto il tag cycleway:both=lane o cycleway:right=lane al segmento esistente della strada.
Grazie del tempo che dedichi al miglioramento delle mappe di OpenStreetMap.
A presto,

Alessandro
voschix (2026-04-02 11:16:57+00:00): Stavo per scrivere la stessa cosa. correggerò l'errore.
Volker
SekeRob (2023-01-14 13:43:05+00:00): Confirmed with rendering of forest restored.
Loremo (2023-01-16 14:00:57+00:00): Sali feuerstein.
Du hast beim Eschenbergwald (Relation 4756964) den landuse tag durch die zwei leaf Tags ersetzt. Was das absicht? Ich vermute der landuse Tag sollte bleiben. Nun wird der Wald nicht mehr gerendert.
Gruss Loremo
Loremo (2023-01-17 13:07:36+00:00): Repariert duch Lirum Larum inhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131371138
Agaric (2023-01-14 13:56:23+00:00): Erreur, la source de cette modification c'est les sites web
eggie (2023-01-14 15:44:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SekeRob (2023-01-14 14:08:09+00:00): Confirmed rendering of this self intersecting and overlaps of meadow/farmland and adjacent areas restored.
Warin61 (2023-01-15 00:41:22+00:00): What is the source of the postcode information?
Hb- (2023-01-15 09:34:11+00:00): The postcode 2550 is valid for all addresses in Cobargo and Wandella. Source was the website of the Wandella Hall in January 2020: https://www.begavalley.nsw.gov.au/cp_themes/default/page.asp?p=DOC-HWA-11-05-76
Warin61 (2023-01-17 10:19:46+00:00): copyright
https://begavalley.nsw.gov.au/council/copyright-and-disclaimer
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-22 22:03:13+00:00): Please ensure you are using the correct golfcart tags.  "Path=golfcart"
NVBW_Seifert (2024-05-20 09:03:06+00:00): Hallo,
Du hast in diesem Changeset an den beiden Anlagen mit kostenpflichtig versehen, obwohl die unverändert den Typ Bügel haben. Hast Du aus Versehen da kostenpflichtige Tags ergänzt oder vergessen, den Typ ggfs. auf locker zu ändern?

Es geht um die Objekte 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/853196442
und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/853196439
BCNorwich (2023-01-15 08:42:12+00:00): Hi, I've removed several duplicated sections of highway that you accidentally uploaded. Please try to avoid duplicating highways.

Regards Bernard.
KCVI1E2JCI (2023-01-16 16:07:21+00:00): definitely will learn how to add and contribute
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-01-30 18:39:02+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم إدخال اماكن شخصية للخريطة العامة
user_8655426 (2023-01-15 11:52:32+00:00): こんばんは。
この変更セットで建物(roof)に layer=1 を追加されましたが、建物の下に地物が存在しないのでこのタグは不要です。(西インターの料金所はOKです。)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/909255147
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:building%3Droof

iDエディタの「改善提案」機能を使って自動的編集をされていますが、この機能で検出されるデータは、すべてが「誤り」というわけではありません。「誤りの可能性があるデータ」です。なので、自動的に「タグをアップグレード」せず、本当にエラーなのかを Wiki、航空画像、現地調査などで確認するようお願いいたします。
「改善提案」について少し調べてみましたが、誤検出が多いようです。特にタグ関係のものは「ルール」のチェックを外したほうが良いかもしれません。

-------------------------

私は主に西区のマッピングをしていますが、お互い同じ市内を編集しており、OSMでは「ご近所さん」ということで、よろしくお願いいたします！
forstner-m (2023-01-16 05:48:11+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe gesehen, dass beim Busterminal in Rohrbach einige Fehler in OSMOSE durch die Änderungen standen sind. Ich bitte um Überprüfung.
Danke!
Schöne Grüße
Michael
Jgaordhelagenornres (2023-01-19 18:57:49+00:00): Danke für die Zusendung des Links.
Habe die drei Fehler nun korrigiert.
LG Gregor
forstner-m (2023-01-19 20:40:54+00:00): Vielen Dank...
Mazda05 (2023-01-14 15:42:47+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
map per (2023-01-14 17:12:50+00:00): Hallo Kim Jühlich,

betreibt die Gärtnerei Johannes Rutz hier (1) wirklich einen Blumenladen oder wächst dort nur das Obst und Gemüse, das dann auf Wochenmärkten verkauft wird?

Danke und viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10554632910/history
Strubbl (2023-01-14 17:39:33+00:00): Laut dem eigenen Hinweis in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3518119 gibts kein Laden
map per (2023-01-14 17:59:17+00:00): Danke, ich vergess immer bei Organic Maps auch nach Hinweisen zu schauen.

Habs jetzt als landuse=greenhouse_horticulture eingezeichnet.
Patrickov (2023-01-15 00:19:29+00:00): Next time do not use one edit over such a large area.  Thanks.
julcnx (2023-01-16 06:51:51+00:00): More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131267795
user_5359 (2023-06-14 19:33:39+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1131971929. Is this a street or water? Please notice: We use the key highway for every type of street.
DaveF (2023-01-18 13:32:21+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/269692305

All railway station in Britain are tagged as railway=station.

Classifying halts are considered too subjective. Request stops have their specific tag.

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2020-February/thread.html#24097
UKChris (2023-01-18 21:43:41+00:00): Subjective in what way?
DaveF (2023-01-18 23:51:25+00:00): https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2020-February/024101.html
UKChris (2023-01-25 19:39:47+00:00): That link hasn't provided any additional insight as to why a Halt shouldn't be tagged as a Halt, other than your own personal objection?

The text in the wiki "Halt is an unclear, ambiguous term." also seems to have been added by you, and is a phrase I feel is wholly inaccurate.

I'm genuinely curious why you feel the Halt tag isn't good enough in your eyes? I don't think you finding the display via Carto "irritating" is a justifiable reason to not tag a Halt as a Halt.
DaveF (2023-01-25 22:16:40+00:00): I stated my reasons for not using it in my original post.
It wasn't just my opinion. There were a few in agreement in the discussion. No one objected. A week later I announced I was making the changes, again no objection.

Another user created the request stop wiki page. I added the link to it from the halt page.

"a phrase I feel is wholly inaccurate."
How would you define halt when compared to a station? Where's the cut off line & what defines the characteristics of that line? Is it number of tracks? Number of platforms? If it's (un)manned? If it's a request stop? If it's popular? if so, how many passengers defines 'popular'?