piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:55:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:15:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:41:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Hufkratzer (2023-01-06 13:24:42+00:00): Hi, du hast an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/879441132 das building=yes durch leisure=horse_riding ersetzt. Nach dem Luftbild könnte es ein Gebäude mit Solarpanels drauf sein. Jedes Gebäude sollte ein building-Tag haben; falls es eine Reithalle, kannst du https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building=riding_hall verwenden. Dafür gibt es aber kein Preset, das muss man eintippen.
Das leisue=horse_riding (Preset "Reitanlage") ist nicht für Reithallen, Pferdeställe oder andere Gebäude geeignet, sondern für komplette Reitanlagen/Reiterhöfe u.ä.,  siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:36:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse2 (2023-02-15 13:08:36+00:00): Hello,
I think that you might have accidentially added the quiet_lane designation to the wrong thing on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539425190 .  That's an admin boundary; presumably you meant to add to the road?
There's a list of ones to check at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1rn8 , which includes a hedge and a fence.
Best Regards,
Andy
glibbertorsten (2023-01-05 08:34:40+00:00): Diese Hausnummer scheint schon lange zu fehlen, sehr schön.
glibbertorsten (2023-01-05 08:34:12+00:00): Hallo! Schau mal genau auf die Karte, die Hausnummer 17 ist schon seit vielen Jahren in der Karte. Bitte entferne deine doppelte Hausnummer wieder. Danke.
glibbertorsten (2023-01-05 08:35:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4058576699
glibbertorsten (2023-01-05 08:34:47+00:00): Hallo! Schau mal genau auf die Karte, die Hausnummer 17 ist schon seit vielen Jahren in der Karte. Bitte entferne deine doppelte Hausnummer wieder. Danke.
glibbertorsten (2023-01-05 08:35:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4058576702
glibbertorsten (2023-01-05 08:35:00+00:00): Hallo! Schau mal genau auf die Karte, die Hausnummer 17 ist schon seit vielen Jahren in der Karte. Bitte entferne deine doppelte Hausnummer wieder. Danke.
glibbertorsten (2023-01-05 08:36:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4058576700
glibbertorsten (2023-01-05 08:36:33+00:00): Ich meine natürlich die "21", sorry
voschix (2023-01-05 12:24:51+00:00): Hi, you re-added access=permissive to via Rudena. This is not correct. This is part of the ZTL, which limits access  to permit holders at certain times. Please do not confound "permissive" with "access requires a permit". More in general: mapping of the ZTL in Padova is broken, and needs fixing.
SekeRob (2023-01-05 12:42:57+00:00): Sorry about that. The problem of routing in part stems from the ways along the river which has a vehicle=no on it. This prevents cars from even reaching the oneway to Via Rudena north-east bounds and thus kicks off a other navigation issues there in the zone.
SekeRob (2023-01-05 12:56:52+00:00): Specifically this street is not reachable
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29984714
because this one
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29985042
was tagged as vehicle=private + motorcar=private, not sure why the double here. Permissive is actually generally no good as it allows everything including hazmat.
voschix (2023-01-05 13:34:54+00:00): As I said, the ZTL in Padova is not correctly mapped. I do not consider myself sufficiently knowledgable in the field of complex access restrictions. What I know is that the roads that you have mentioned, are off-limits to me by car, as I am not a permit holder. What is not clear to me, is which additional restrictions apply for permit holders once they are inside the ZTL. I fear that you will not be able to resolve the problem that the local mappers have not solved. Normal routing engines should not allow a car driver to get into the ZTL, most of the time. In addition there are different ZTL zones with different access restrictions and different time tables.
SekeRob (2023-01-05 14:23:34+00:00): The Padova ZTL site spells it out quite nicely, access:conditional, vehicle:conditional to specify who/what/when, the access points inclusive for each zone. I'd start with creating relations of the relevant streets as outlined in https://www.padovanet.it/allegati/C_1_Allegati_17687_Allegato.pdf
Then while tagging it's easy to see which of the 5 is being selected and affected.
voschix (2023-01-05 16:41:47+00:00): If you feel you can do this, I am happy to do on-the-ground checks for you on request. Also, I presume you have seen that Mapillary coverage is good here.
SekeRob (2023-01-05 18:14:08+00:00): Thanks for the offer.

TTYL
SekeRob (2023-01-06 10:31:47+00:00): Before doing anything to the tagging and relation creations, first mission for you: Verify the motorcar access Pzl Palatucci and southbound on Riviera Ruzante as those are the key hangups for getting into Rudena and beyond where access=no on Ruzante but not on Businello is conflicting. Ground imagery I cannot find signs for indicating motorcar=private+vehicle=private (double to me), the way is actively used beyond the Questura gated entrance. There's a corner sign on Tito Livio telling that traffic is regulated and a direction sign requiring a turn right PLUS traffic light to boot, so whoever goes onto Tito Livio can't go anywhere with the current tagging on the Pzl and Ruzante, -without- any warning of restriction at the Rotonda so drivers are fried at that Pzl point.

On the side, the Pzl geometry could use a tweak or 2 in geometry as it ends at the Civ.6 gate of the Questura (streegt name signs position). There's also a sign for a seemingly closed building passage with name of Via Guelchiere at that square. Maybe map that 'for-the-record' as it physically still exists.

Thumbs up for that 14 Ebike spots charging station right at the street corner where it says no bike is allowed. I like planologie logic. Everywhere the same.

TTYL
HighRouleur (2023-03-19 10:32:37+00:00): Way 456171193 is designated a cycle way but couldn’t see any signage to suggest this. Should this be changed to a footpath?
Mappo99 (2023-03-19 20:24:31+00:00): This way meets all the physical criteria to be a cycle way - 2+ m wide, routed away from houses, part of a looping circuit through a park, etc - except for a sign. And Casey council is very poor in this respect, as you know; I don't expect they will ever get around to it. I think you would be doing a disservice to everyone if you were to tag it bicycles=no, as that would not respect the reality. 
So my answer is no. Please don't.
Actually, I've noticed the older part of this path to the west needs updating too.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:53:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:14:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Palolo (2023-01-05 17:07:40+00:00): Thank you for  your interest in mapping Tanzania. Please not that a building should not have the name "house", also all buildings should be traced accurately.
wkdgs (2023-01-06 13:36:44+00:00): Hi und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Ich habe deine Änderungen wieder rückgängig gemacht, weil sie sich nicht an das üblicherweise verwendete Format halten und die Adressinformation zu diesem Haus bereits an einem anderen Punkt hinterlegt ist.

Schau doch vor deinen nächsten Änderungen einmal hier vorbei: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Hauptseite
mueschel (2023-01-07 11:31:35+00:00): Hi,
could you check your destination tags you added recently?  The order of subkeys is not the usual one, e.g.

destination:lanes:symbol -> destination:symbol:lanes

The order is always

destination
[:subkey]
[:lanes]
[:backward|:forward]
DNL852 (2023-07-05 19:14:53+00:00): Ahoj, proč je na Těsnohlídkově zmapován chodník, který neexistuje? Navíc prochází budovami (což ukazují i errory) a je označen jako podzemní...
janvarmuza (2023-07-06 16:04:08+00:00): ahoj, odstraněno, odstranil jsem tu část chodníka na druhé strane, nevím proč se tak stalo, snad už je ok, kdyžtak uprav pls, díky
DNL852 (2023-07-07 06:20:23+00:00): Díky, nevěděl jsem, jestli to není nějaký zaměr :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:42:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
user_12500175 (2023-01-05 10:30:31+00:00): Hallo,
Der Ein/Ausgang gehört am den Umriss des Gebäudes.
Der Tag "Name" ist für Eigennamen reserviert nicht für Beschreibungen. Also keinen Namen an einen Eigangsnode. hier noch das OSM WIKI dazu:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Gruß
Danfost
Taksine (2023-12-18 04:17:44+00:00): 你是怎么知道KK园区内部的细节的？你怎么知道哪个是医院，哪个是酒店，哪个是赌场？
bjdayutong (2023-12-19 08:47:17+00:00): 你好，根据https://ts1.cn.mm.bing.net/th/id/R-C.f1db43308973bfe22836c6f0729775f5?rik=EYoAXvp1cSJyDg&riu=http%3a%2f%2fn1.itc.cn%2fimg8%2fwb%2frecom%2f2022%2f12%2f04%2f167014197032716100.JPEG&ehk=KI2lzFRIcrxIQzr1tg3GA841reKMA1DHKRDG7%2bXJoTU%3d&risl=&pid=ImgRaw&r=0
得知，如有更准确信源请补充指正
user_12500175 (2023-01-05 10:40:15+00:00): Das gleiche Problem bei diesem Änderungsatz, auch hier sind die Knoten des Weges verschoben und gehen jetzt über Gebäude

Gruß
Danfost
eggie (2023-01-05 10:42:21+00:00): Welkom bij OSM..
office=company heb ik toegevoegd. Andes zie je geen naam op de kaart.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-01-05 10:44:04+00:00): Bedrijventerrein maar gelijk uitgebreid.
eggie (2023-01-05 10:46:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
user_12500175 (2023-01-05 10:37:55+00:00): Hallo,
hier hast du auch die Knoten des Weges des Fußweges verschoben.

Achte auf die Warnmeldungen in ID die Zeigen dir sowas an.

Gruß
Danfost
ToniE (2023-01-05 12:55:58+00:00): Bitte auch hier den Kommentar zu 'name' (Name ist nur der Name, keine Beschreibung) beachten und name="Strand zum Entenfüttern" entfernen.
ToniE (2023-01-05 12:59:22+00:00): Bitte auch hier sport=9pin hinzufügen und name entfernen.
user_12500175 (2023-01-05 10:26:44+00:00): Hallo,
klasse dass du bei OSM mitmachst und hilfst die Datenbank zu verbessern.

Allerdings hast du bei der Lindauerstraße den Verlauf verschoben, die geht jetzt quer über die Gebäude.

Noch viel Spass beim Mappen.
Gruß
Danfost
ToniE (2023-01-05 12:58:39+00:00): Hallo,

auch hier bitte 'name' entfernen und 

sport=9pin

hinzufügen.

Daraus ergibt sich: "Kegelbahn", also braucht's name=Kegelbahn nicht

Name ist nur der Name, keine Beschreibung
ChernCenter (2023-01-06 09:47:36+00:00): Is it true that there are no right angles in buildings?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:43:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Diacritic (2023-01-10 08:41:34+00:00): Hello,

You are incorrect in this instance. Roads should not overlap without sharing a node, as it represents an intersection between the routable objects. This is correctly flagged as an error by all validation on iD
eggie (2023-01-05 12:25:49+00:00): Dag C Batenburg..
In de routering zou het niet uit moeten maken. residential en unclassified zijn gelijkwaardig in routering.
Gebruik de de routeapp van Live Op in dit geval? 
De Dorpsstraat heeft wel voorrang in de routering als doorgaande weg en daardoor een hogere wegklassering.
Je actie zal dus geen effect hebben. 
Je Schoolstraat als residential klasseren is overigens wel correct.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-01-05 12:27:21+00:00): Routering gaat correct met osrm graphHopper en Valhalla
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=51.85943%2C4.70471%3B51.85758%2C4.70634
C Batenburg (2023-01-05 20:33:14+00:00): Bedankt voor alle info en moeite!
UTF-8 (2023-01-08 15:59:12+00:00): Ob das Bibelheim ein Hotel ist, darüber lässt sich sicherlich streiten, aber von mir aus OK. Jetzt haben wir aber ein Doppel-Tagging: Node 294196695 bezeichnet es als tourism=guest_hose. Eines davon sollte weg. Außerdem gehört Haus Nr. 40 definitiv nicht zum Bibelheim als Hotel, es sind Privatwohnungen.
Scout Jens (2023-01-09 07:37:10+00:00): Es finden auch Tagungen statt dort. Wie würdest auf es machen? Um 40 herum Wohngelände und der Rest Freizeitgelände?
UTF-8 (2023-01-10 14:43:57+00:00): 40 gehört definitiv nicht dazu.
Ich bin mir auch nicht sicher, ob man da überhaupt übernachten kann, wenn man nicht an den Veranstaltungen des Bibelheims teilnehmen möchte. Am Sonntag kann ich da mal nachfragen/nachschauen.
Was wäre denn der Tag für ein Freizeitgelände? Ich bin da aus dem Wiki nicht schlau geworden. Beim nochmal nachlesen scheint mit tatsächlich der Hotel-Tag zu passen. Aber dann sollte der guest_house-Node weg und die Daten davon übernommen werden.
UTF-8 (2023-01-15 11:34:49+00:00): Ich habe die Fläche angepaast.
Man kann da tatsächlich übernachten, auch wenn man nichts mit den Bibelheim-Veranstaltungen zu tun hat. Von daher darf das Hotel gerne bleiben.
Die Daten aus dem guest_house node habe ich übernommen und den dann entfernt, damit es nicht doppelt da ist.
Scout Jens (2023-01-15 12:05:37+00:00): Danke fürs prüfen vor Ort. Sollen wir dann den Bereich um Hausnummer 40 noch als Wohngebiet eintragen? Würde das für Dich passen?
UTF-8 (2023-01-15 12:08:38+00:00): kannst du gerne als Wohngebiet eintragen.
eggie (2023-01-05 11:01:08+00:00): Dag Corné.. Je vraagt feedback.  De info heb ik even verplaatst naar de adresnode en gebouw heeft nu de juiste Kadastergegevens.
Gebouwen worden normaliter periodiek geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG.
Je zou een terugmelding kunnen doen naar het Kadaster dat de bouw al af is.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=utrechtsestraatweg%20159&resultOffset=0&objectId=0340200000357964&geometry.x=164784.53&geometry.y=442613.723&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0340010000357965

MVG
eggie
Supaplex030 (2023-01-05 11:23:30+00:00): Hey momabebra, kleiner Hinweis (weiß nicht, ob du es vielleicht nur vergessen hast): Den Wegen über die Straße solltest du zusätzlich zu "highway=footway" noch "footway=crossing" geben.

 Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Berlin/Verkehrswende/Gehwege.

lg, Alex
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:47:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
mcliquid (2023-01-07 14:47:47+00:00): Hello, it is not good practice to add an addr:street to an existing addr:place. I have removed this again. Moreover, there is no street here called Millrütte.
Luzandro (2023-01-08 06:04:50+00:00): which isn't something that's obvious to new users, as the iD-Editor doesn't show addr:place in the default address form and only hidden away under "Tags" - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:place
eggie (2023-01-05 10:48:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Zo te zien loopt het achterom nog wel iets verder door tot het laatste schuurtje.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Ritchie Brouwers (2023-01-05 10:57:56+00:00): Hi Eggie, Ik zal zometeen even gaan kijken om te zien hoe ver ik precies kan doorlopen.
eggie (2023-01-05 11:02:37+00:00): Het hoeft niet gelijk nu 😀

Mapse
Eggie
Ritchie Brouwers (2023-01-07 19:10:19+00:00): Vanmiddag gecheckt, loopt idd door tot aan de schuurtjes op de kaart. Daarna kun je niet meer verder.
eggie (2023-01-07 19:22:04+00:00): Up to you 😀

Mapse
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:55:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:16:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:28:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
osmviborg (2023-01-05 11:03:00+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
HellMap (2023-01-05 11:17:43+00:00): Hi!

Thanks for updating the map!

I made a bunch of changes to the edited areas to follow various OSM guidelines and principles on tagging. It's mostly a bunch of small fixes, so just letting you know. Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks!
Jakka (2023-01-05 11:34:02+00:00): Het enkel verwijderen van piste lijkt niet voldoende. Ook het gebied moet aangepast worden volgens resterende opp.
Niet vrijgekomen ruimte invullen landuse=construction contruction=*
user_12523467 (2023-01-05 16:20:52+00:00): Hello sameralakkam,

what are these monument you have mapped all around Baghdad?
NieWnen (2023-01-24 09:15:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1127468039
To przejście dla pieszych?
Oznakowane/nieoznakowane?
PanWanek (2023-01-25 08:15:56+00:00): Tak, to przejscie dla pieszych. Jest oznakowane.
NorthCrab (2023-01-05 20:55:45+00:00): Metoda wprowadzania nie ma znaczenia, jak działa to działa. Rób jak ci wygodniej ;)
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-17 06:31:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8566393854/history - that was supposed to be shop=vacant, right?
François2 (2023-08-17 09:24:26+00:00): good catch !
SekeRob (2023-01-05 12:22:10+00:00): Hai mappato strade duplicate Via Camillo Pasti con un secondo nome Via Daniele Manin. Non è permesso. Qual è il nome corretto di questa sezione?
Nota, nome:sinistra e nome:destra sono possibili nel tagging, ma le strade a doppia mappa, no.

Nota i 3 allarme da sopra, bisogno una connezione al croce con Biasioli

Buone mappatura
VictorIE (2024-08-05 18:51:15+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1127470501

I'm wondering about access=no

Is it not accessible to anyone, not even staff?
hillwalker1 (2026-07-30 12:03:33+00:00): It was closed during the Covid period, the wooden steps removed and the top and bottom access somewhat blocked. It still exists & people use it but it is not supposed to be used - a shame as I remember the steps seeming like a big challenge to climb from the end of the lake up to the castle ruins using these steep steps when I was still in primary school.
Harel M (2023-01-06 14:19:30+00:00): Hi Sanniu, any change to split images of merged points into different tags (image, image1) instead of using the ";" as it may be a valid image url character, although not a very good friendly one...
Thanks!!
Sanniu (2023-01-08 07:54:20+00:00): Hi,
sorry, that was automatic change by ID editor.
I'll try to pay attention to this in  future, but also suggest to file a bug against ID for wrong tag merging.
silversurfer83 (2023-01-05 16:44:43+00:00): Hallo :)
Warum hast du den Dorfplatz gelöscht?
Grüße
silversurfer83
silversurfer83 (2023-03-10 15:29:37+00:00): Ja moin,

da ich gerade wieder in der Gegend war, dachte ich guck mal, ob ich überhaupt eine Antwort bekommen hatte...
War bis jetzt noch nicht der Fall.
Registrierst du Änderungssatzdiskussionen überhaupt?
Grüße
silversurfer83
map per (2023-01-05 20:42:38+00:00): Wegen "Meine Änderungen überprüfen": Sieht gut aus, danke!
maraf24 (2023-06-04 21:23:34+00:00): Usunięte 
bridge:structure=beam
bridge=viaduct
z https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374158726 
Dlaczego?
To jest wiadukt kolejowy, nie tunel.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:13:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:44:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:28:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
RicoElectrico (2023-01-05 13:35:51+00:00): Dzień dobry, czy wobec tego ten wcześniejszy AED jest do skasowania jako pomyłka? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10308397610
PWiK Wodzisław Śląski (2023-01-05 13:49:57+00:00): Dzień dobry,
tak, do skasowania jako pomyłka.