piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JessAk71 (2024-06-27 04:41:58+00:00): Hi AKittyCat,
Thanks for your edits, the node you have added for the parking garage is already represented as a building here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330244668 so a node is not needed since its already represented as this building. I removed the node since it duplicates information already on the map that is best represented as the existing parking garage building area.
bxl-forever (2024-06-21 18:05:01+00:00): Thanks for this.
Next time, please make sure to upload such changes separately, to avoid a large bounding box covering a large part of the country because of two points 109 km apart. :-)
Fishezzz (2024-06-21 18:12:21+00:00): I haven't made a lot of edits yet, so I wasn't aware the bounding box was a thing for edits. I will keep it in mind in the future.
yrtimiD (2024-06-24 19:36:50+00:00): Welcome!
If you want to add multiple house numbers for single building, please separate them with a regular comma.
Please be sure to always read tag docs before using them:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:housenumber
mavl (2024-06-21 14:47:55+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, из какого источника следует, что в этом месте находится пляж с названием "Поворот на карьер"?
DawsZed (2024-12-01 06:52:02+00:00): Hi there, I've reverted this changeset because the Supreme Court only ruled on the distinction between the original island and subsequent landfill specifically for Ellis Island. The court didn't apply this distinction to Liberty Island. The 1834 Compact granting Liberty island to NY still holds until challenged: "The state of New York shall retain its present jurisdiction of and over Bedlow’s and Ellis’s islands" (US Statues at Large, Volume 4, Page 708-711).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159795937
mavl (2024-11-13 07:56:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159079151 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
NeisBot (2024-06-21 15:36:25+00:00): Hi samuelzammit, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/node/322591289
https://osm.org/node/4159831407

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-21 15:59:05+00:00): Thanks for your mapped beaches.
Looks good!

#HappyMapping
科技骏马 (2024-11-02 12:19:29+00:00): 该变更集十分可疑，在柯桥区前加“杭州市”（部分名称已在153172949修复）；鉴水路站车站建筑轮廓与轨道上的停车点共用；中国轻纺城站与华联国际商贸城、蓝天·商业中心新增公共边；瓜渚湖东岸公园的footway(1281024451)与中泽横江(425707684)新增了公共点
bxl-forever (2024-06-21 18:02:07+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for the clear description title.
Just one thing: OSM is a map for everyone, not solely for motorists.  This edit broke routing in the area.  I recreated some connectors that will make it possible to route pedestrians through this area, and also cyclists.
fititnt (2024-06-30 23:06:19+00:00): Olá dusziv.

Nesse changeset você deletou a igreja adicionada pelo fernandobohrer 7 anos atrás (No changeset dele : source=knowledge) em https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4850905269 sem manter o histórico (vide https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history).

Você poderia recuperar a informação? Para os colaboradores com conhecimento local, é importante o que eles criam ser preservado; isso também permite descobrir no futuro quais informações adicionadas por pessoas mapeando remotamente é algo legítimo.

Obrigado.
dusziv (2024-07-01 15:24:48+00:00): Hi @fititnt, sorry for the hassle. What happened is that while validating a task, a node (church) got merged with a building that was poorly mapped (unsquared) and transferred tags to it. The church also had a building tag. I reverted the changeset anyway.
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-21 16:03:14+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/152998601
fititnt (2024-06-22 17:43:23+00:00): Olá MapperManuel.

Esse changeset quebrou município de Arroio do Meio/RS (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/242537) e Capitão/RS (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/242461). Isso aconteceu depois da edição na linha seca https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/512958552/history
BladeTC (2024-06-22 14:00:57+00:00): Hey anthaas, please, those "place=farm" are georeferenced and linked to our Public Safety Services and sholul'd not be moved or edited.
Thanks again for your helping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152999301
anthaas (2024-06-22 16:45:39+00:00): Hi, I was validating the urgent project on the HOT tasking Manager. During this process I was fixing common mapper mistakes like unsquared buildings and connected buildings to roads. I might move buildings slightly and some minor service roads. I don't believe I've touched any features tagged as place=farm. Antonin.
BladeTC (2024-06-25 01:04:52+00:00): Thanks again for your help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152999301
Vinber-Pro (2024-06-25 10:08:24+00:00): Hi,
i think "name:eu" is a better way to introduce euskadi name than name=* here.

you replaced lot of name=* by euskadi name and don't put them in name:eu


please could you change this ?

regards
Vinber-Pro (2024-06-25 13:16:14+00:00): Egun On (my only word with milesker)

to avoid complication, after discussion here https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/changement-de-name-en-langue-basque/24877, i reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153156883

Open to discuss and improve the name:eu=*

cheers
Vinber-Pro (2024-06-25 13:46:48+00:00): if you want a map with name:eu=* you can see an example http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=13&lat=43.4188&lon=-1.6509&layers=00000B0F
Taya_S (2024-06-21 16:11:53+00:00): reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152999552
SomeoneElse (2024-06-21 16:26:57+00:00): Hello,
You've removed the name from e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121268133/history here.  Sometimes a description _is_ the name - are you sure that it is not in the cases that you have changed?
Did you discuss this automatic edit anywhere before doing it?
Best Regards,
Andy
AroundTheGlobe (2024-06-21 16:32:17+00:00): I've looked at the individual cases as good as I could without being at every location. If you think it was a harmful edit, I can revert it.
SomeoneElse (2024-06-21 16:34:42+00:00): I'd suggest reverting these edits and following https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct .
kitsee (2024-06-25 13:35:44+00:00): Hi Sabor, Welcome to OSM congrats on your first changeset. I noted you appeared to have accidently moved a bench into the middle of the roundabout. I've corrected it and put it back. Please take care not to accidently move nodes in the future. 
Kind Regards, Kits.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152999521
fititnt (2024-06-21 20:41:46+00:00): Hello. We need urgent contact with whoever can revert the changes to Projeto GPS Rural (data directly from OSM already used by local civil defense was damaged).

- https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/urgente-necessidade-de-reversao-edicoes-delecoes-sem-discussao-em-dados-do-projeto-gps-rural-em-estrela-rs/114994
- https://t.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade/73779/75335
BladeTC (2024-06-21 22:28:17+00:00): fititnt nesta changeset não foi perdido nenhuma informação importante, apenas edificações e agumas vias tiveram sua geometria atualizada. Se algo foi perdido, gentileza especifique para sabermos.
BladeTC
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152999625
fititnt (2024-06-21 23:06:16+00:00): @Blade_TC esse changeset que comentei (changeset/152999625) é de validação. E o BBOX dele contém o BBOX do changeset/152519948.

Outros objetos mapeados para o Projeto GPS Rural é ainda mais complicado detectar, porque eles foram movidos e/ou incluídos como parte de outros elementos. 

No changeset/152328819 (embora definitivamente não urgente como os códigos de localização, mas apenas para comentar) teve highway=service deletada. E no changeset/152328725 , em vez de explicar porque ele deletou, o mesmo mapeador reclamou de eu usar português.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-11 02:48:03+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11999292799/history has shop = bathroom_equipment that was added in this edit
is it shop=bathroom_furnishing ? or is something else matching?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=bathroom_furnishing
Maybe the current value should be documented as good shop value worth using?
Taya_S (2024-06-21 16:54:51+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153001258
BladeTC (2024-06-21 23:25:24+00:00): Just be carefull by moving any "place=farm", these objects are placed and linked to our Public Safety Services, and should't be edited.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153001873
triantium (2024-09-10 09:09:05+00:00): Was sind denn die Vorteile beim einbau von Wendekreisen, die Hofeinfahrten sind zum grossen Teil nicht dafür geeignet zu wenden. oder um wirklich so ausgezeichnet zu werden.
RVR015 (2024-06-21 18:02:57+00:00): Adding to the discussion here for more context. The OSM wiki for unmarked crossings states, "Some states have laws that establish an implied crossing on every side of every intersection by default[1] or wherever one is implied by a sidewalk flanking the intersection,[2] unless otherwise prohibited by a regulatory sign. This can technically result in very unsafe crossings that most people would not recognize as crossings, such as across a busy four-lane road without any pedestrian infrastructure. It would be reasonable to omit such crossings in favor of safer ones." This edit seems to align with the OSM wiki. Please feel free to add to the discussion! We are open to feedback and happy to revert if others feel that this should remain an unmarked crossing.
pantufla (2024-10-19 01:35:37+00:00): Esta dirección es correcta?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11999352508/history
literan (2024-06-23 12:31:36+00:00): зачем создавать мультиполигоны из одного участника?
Grass-snake (2024-06-23 16:45:33+00:00): Забор — отдельный объект, землепользование — отдельным отношением.
Grass-snake (2024-06-23 16:56:34+00:00): One feature, one OSM element
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

=== Examples of bad situations ===
A closed way tagged with two feature tags, one of which is usually a linear feature such as barrier=hedge and another which represents an area such as amenity=school. In this case it is ambiguous if the barrier is meant to represent an area or a line, and for all properties it is unclear to which feature they belong. In such a case you may consider making a separate relation relation for the amenity=school: make the closed way area an Role outer member of the relation and transfer the educational tags from the way area to the relevant relation relation.

=== Примеры плохих ситуаций ===
Замкнутая линия, отмеченная двумя тегами объектов, один из которых обычно является линейным объектом (таким как barrier=hedge, а другой представляет полигон, такой как amenity=school). В этом случае неясно, должен ли барьер представлять собой область или линию, и для всех свойств неясно, к какому объекту они относятся. В таком случае вы можете рассмотреть возможность создания отдельного отношения для объекта amenity=school: сделайте замкнутую линию с ролью outer (внешней) участником отношения и перенесите "образовательные" теги с полигона в соответствующее отношение "отношение".

Я не вижу смысла объединить теги в забора и землепользования на одном объекте.
literan (2024-06-23 20:36:10+00:00): что-то новенькое, попахивает абсурдом.

не хотите ли в чате/форуме обсудить прежде чем массово перемапливать?
InsertUser (2024-06-22 01:18:37+00:00): This "apartment" appears to be in the middle of the road. Where is it meant to be and what is your source for it?
Branko Kokanovic (2024-09-29 18:11:20+00:00): Zdravo,
Baš mi je drago što neki planinari koriste OSM, i još i ucrtavaju staze! Mi iz OSM zajednice Srbije smo imali projekat da unesemo sve PSS staze, više o tome možete pročitati ovde: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Serbia/Projekti/PSS_staze

Naravno, svaka staza, svaki kvalitet staze, svaka voda za piće usput je bitna! A to jedino mogu da urade ljudi na licu mesta, i tu su planinari najbitniji. Ako želite da se više uključite ili da uključite i "kolege", mi smo na forumu na https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/rs/64 i na Telegramu na https://t.me/osm_sr, pa svrnite, da razmenimo iskustva i dobre prakse! Ako ništa drugo, probajte Android aplikaciju StreetComplete, to je najprostiji način da neko pomogne, direktno sa terena. Hvala što ste menjali OSM i do sad!
rskedgell (2024-07-22 13:05:40+00:00): No, not more accurate. There is no physical separation of carriageways at this junction, so your edit was tagging for the renderer. Please read the linked wiki page.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154262371
emersonveenstra (2024-06-22 12:34:30+00:00): Hi there,

For the bus route, all the tags from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1294793985 need to go on the relation, and the route needs to include the streets that it runs on. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses#Adding_a_bus_route_to_OpenStreetMap for how to add a route to OSM. Hope this helps!
silversurfer83 (2024-06-22 12:50:08+00:00): Danke. Hatte ich schon wieder vergessen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150875299
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153003825
literan (2024-06-23 12:28:08+00:00): вы сломали полигон military https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2549543

он теперь с раздвоенной линией. Поправите?
wombatmaper (2025-06-07 19:41:17+00:00): what is this toilets:handwashing node?
wombatmaper (2025-06-07 19:41:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11999437737/history
LittleWolfCorban (2025-06-08 07:19:22+00:00): after the fenced animal enclosure, there are installed sinks and taps with soap and water, informing visitors to wash their hands after contact with animals to reduce bacteria spread. I wasn't sure how to add this properly or to add this at all. If this poi is redundant, my bad
wombatmaper (2025-06-08 11:40:17+00:00): hmm interesting, dont know eather. Maybe man_made=water_tap might be better? I was just wondering if this was a misstaged toilet but I guess its just a wierd edge case
wombatmaper (2025-06-08 11:40:34+00:00): Thanks for your work though, the area looks great!
LittleWolfCorban (2025-06-08 18:42:20+00:00): Ok I fixed it now
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-21 19:00:34+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153005616
RedAuburn (2024-06-21 23:31:24+00:00): Hi, i have reverted this, but added a private access tag to the way. 

please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information
Mathias_ADAV (2026-06-19 11:49:54+00:00): n'existe plus à priori
literan (2024-06-23 12:25:06+00:00): зачем вы удалили тег building=yes со здания? это вандализм

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/809693125/history
Sit45 (2024-06-23 12:26:07+00:00): Здравствуйте, исправлю.
Lezurex (2024-06-22 11:35:28+00:00): Hallo Paul,

Meintest du hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11828895329) https://www.sixseasonsmt.com/ ? Die aktuell eingetragene URL gibt es nicht.

LG Lezurex
paulbrunner (2024-07-29 09:25:12+00:00): Hallo Lezurex

Danke für Deinen Hinweis. Bin grad nochmal vorbeigegangen: 
Vor Ort in der Konradstrasse steht https://www.sixseasonsag.com angeschrieben, die funktioniert auch.
https://www.sixseasonsmt.com/ gibt die gleiche Telefonnummer, aber eine andere Adresse an (Limmatstrasse 119). Ich hab jetzt mal die angeschrieben Website getaggt und die andere im note tag dokumentiert. Vielleicht schalten sie ja die eine oder andere Website irgendwann ab.

Happy mapping,
Paul
silversurfer83 (2024-06-22 12:57:41+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap

danke, dass du hilfst die Karte aktuell zu halten :)

Wünsche viel Spaß dabei die schöne Stadt an der Lahn zu verbessern.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit. Das Wiki hilft und die Menschen der Community auch gerne

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153007026
alrekur (2024-06-24 17:59:00+00:00): the ways I tagged as abandoned are almost completely washed out and not useful to most people.  here is a pic of Way: 1290305051  https://imgur.com/a/XBMSg3w  do you have any reason to tag this as highway= path i don't think that describes the condition very well.
I think abandoned:highway = track would best describes that.  Way: 1290305049 that I had tagged as disused is in better condition but not used I would be ok with dual tagging that one.  Also would be interested in what your source for lidar imagery is usgs 3dep or something else?
George S (2024-06-24 23:40:23+00:00): I changed it from "Line" to "Path" .... since it does not show up at all with "Line" when you view it in Caltopo with the OSM layer.
I generally just mark these old roads/paths as informal and change the visibility to Bad or Horrible if they are hard to follow or not worth following.

I use the LIDAR that is in the OpenStreetMap editor. Either the second "NYSDOP Latest Orthoimagery (Natural Color)" or the "USGS 3D Elevation Program".

I think they come from the NY GIS library orignally.

THanks for verifying those paths on the south side of Platte Clove.
alrekur (2024-06-25 15:32:19+00:00): I like to see everything too even abandoned not usable tracks but some of the dual tagging on unused ways is tagging for the renderer and doesn't best describe the situation on the ground.   I use OSMAND which shows abandoned tracks very lightly in the default osmand map style though not in most of the other preinstalled styles but it is possible to create and share custom map styles that render things in different ways.  looks like maybe you could create a custom layer with paid version of caltopo that might be able to do something similar.   There was a discussion recently in a Catskills hiving group about low quality trails appearing on Alltrails which seems to render all unofficial trails the same.  Ideally every app would have a toggle to show disused and abandoned trails but most unfortunately don't.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-21 20:30:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1784732628
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165141544

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
trial (2024-06-21 20:46:37+00:00): sorry for the huge bounding box, I though I limited it to France mainland, but I got https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4422677220 too (Cayenne)
NeisBot (2024-06-21 20:48:24+00:00): Hi Emiliz, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1294835850

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-22 05:17:53+00:00): Thanks for your mapped beach.
Looks good!

#HappyMapping
citrula (2024-06-21 22:00:23+00:00): welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. It's completely fine for the trail to be made up of different ways rather than one large object. In fact, in cases like this it's not really possible to have the entire trail as a single object.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153009005
lsharpe817 (2024-06-21 22:13:48+00:00): thanks so much - this is my first contribution so i really appreciate the extra context!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-06-26 21:25:05+00:00): This changeset removed the highway tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/21573974/history/17 .
Please be more careful
ceirios (2024-06-21 23:36:00+00:00): Hi again - you requested a review.
Looks good to me!

It will take longer for services that use OSM to apply the change

Cheers
Ceirios
Harfeur (2024-06-23 09:14:46+00:00): Merci !
Frank Peng (2024-06-22 01:36:26+00:00): This changeset has been partially reverted by changeset 153012699 for a deleted node. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153012699
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 06:58:05+00:00): Hello!

You used
barrier=y
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1274710132/history

Have you maybe meant
barrier=yes
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
felipeeugenio (2025-04-29 12:46:12+00:00): Hello Mateusz.
A total typo. I fixed it.
thanks
mcliquid (2024-06-24 09:24:41+00:00): Please don't take this as criticism, but if you at least distribute the changes across continents, it makes it much easier to check the changes. Thank you
Bobropiton (2024-07-10 15:11:54+00:00): Станции ржд не имеют нетворка. Только оператор и оператор:бранч
Пожалуйста, не добавляйте эти тэги вновь. Они будут снесены
J_Doe (2024-07-12 10:12:44+00:00): Поясните, пожалуйста, что такое "нетворк"? Были добавлены только name:ru.
user_11609320 (2024-06-21 22:38:16+00:00): if I created an error, please let me know
silversurfer83 (2024-06-22 13:27:54+00:00): Moin drÿ

danke für deine "erg". Da du noch nicht so viel bei OSM gemacht hast, kannst du sicher nicht alle Gepflogenheiten kennen, daher möchte ich dir hier einfach mal zwei Links in unser Wiki mit an die Hand geben:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Von denen aus kannst du dich einfach weiter durch diesen Dschungel an Informationen hangeln.

Weiter viel Spaß an der Karte
silversurfer83
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 14:09:43+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153011166
rskedgell (2024-07-22 13:50:14+00:00): No, deleting a residential driveway does not make it "more accurate". Reverted.
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 14:09:02+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153011246
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 14:06:56+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153011260
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 14:06:15+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153011326