piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Pikse (2026-03-26 17:18:02+00:00): I assume KNSG stands for Komisja Standaryzacji Nazw Geograficznych. This seemingly reputable body has prepared a list of exonyms that they recommend:
https://www.gov.pl/web/ksng-en/list-of-polish-geographical-names-of-the-world

This list includes only Svetlogorsk (Swietłahorsk ~Swietłagorsk ) in Belarus, Svetlogorsk (Swietłogorsk) is Kaliningrad is not included.

They say "consistent within UN recommendations, its is improper to uphold those exonyms which have gone out of use, are not widely known or were carelessly introduced and turned out to be artificial. Original names should be used in all doubtful cases." (https://www.gov.pl/web/ksng-en/list-of-polish-geographical-names-of-the-world).

Hence it must be concluded that regularly transcribed endonym Swietłogorsk is actually exactly what KSNG recommends for this place.
OlasMapy (2026-03-27 12:59:55+00:00): Gone out of use? Rauschen/Ruszowice is still used. Alt name then.
Yunkers (2026-03-27 13:33:13+00:00): They are obviously old_name at best.
OlasMapy (2026-03-27 21:08:31+00:00): Swetlogorsk (russisch Светлогорск ... deutsch Rauschen (polnisch Ruszowice, litauisch Raušiai)
Teraz widzisz, że nazwy "Rauschen", "Ruszowice" i "Raušiai" są w użyciu?
Yunkers (2026-03-29 17:41:18+00:00): Nie ma tej nazwy na polskiej Wikipedii, niemiecka Wikipedia nie ma żadnego źródła dla tych nazw. 
Więc nie, nie widzę.
OlasMapy (2026-03-30 17:43:19+00:00): https://wikimapia.org/2191717/pl/Swietłogorsk masz Ruszowice jako polską nazwę
Yunkers (2026-03-31 07:46:09+00:00): Czemu nie Ruskowo? Masz jakiekolwiek informacje która z rzekomych nazw jest bardziej poprawną i dlaczego?
OlasMapy (2026-04-01 06:06:28+00:00): to jak nie ma wg ciebie źródła to możesz usunąć w ogóle old/alt/name:pl ale na moje jest. źródła podają Ruszowice jako jedyną polską nazwę.
Yunkers (2026-04-03 13:31:40+00:00): Przecież sam mi podałeś linka do źródła które podaje również Ruskowo :D
OlasMapy (2026-04-03 20:05:10+00:00): no widzę, ale dla Ruszowic jest więcej źródeł a Swietłogorsk to rosyjska transliteracja
OlasMapy (2026-04-03 20:05:23+00:00): więc Swietłogorsk nie jest nazwą polską.
Pikse (2026-04-04 07:19:55+00:00): Of course Swietłogorsk is an endonym not Polish-language exonym. This however isn't a reason avoid it as name:pl value, or to prefer (any) exonym over endonym.

Any name:<lang> key is expected to store just the name variant that is most common in modern sources of given language. This is what was recently also established in this discussion (that you are already aware of): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/whats-everyones-problem-with-name-de/142456

Also, again, please pay attention to KSNG guidelines that I quoted above.
Yunkers (2026-04-04 08:14:21+00:00): Dodatkowo zarówno Rauchen jak i Ruszowice są od dawna w old:name i teraz są zdublowane.
eggie (2026-03-13 20:09:39+00:00): De info had ik hier eerder samengevoegd. 
MVG
eggie
OlasMapy (2026-03-13 21:33:40+00:00): Hattest du nur eine Anderung mit alle dieser Ortsnamen durchgefuhrt, ware es besser.
Ótzï fón GlüϷgor (2026-03-13 21:38:48+00:00): Dzisiaj wprowadziłem tylko nazwy powiatów. Poszczególne miejscowości dodam później, ponieważ czasami nie ma tu bezpośredniego linku do hasła w Wikipedii, który pozwoliłby od razu znaleźć nazwę, więc jest to bardziej pracochłonne.
Baloo Uriza (2026-03-13 22:30:42+00:00): White sign or yellow sign?  maxspeed:advisory is for the yellow signs, maxspeed for the white ones.  The advisory signs are usually lower than the speed limits.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179826226
YomanNH (2026-05-05 08:33:07+00:00): Dlaczego usunąłeś drogę, zamiast ją poprawić?
StC (2026-03-14 19:29:04+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
uprkos (2026-03-13 22:50:16+00:00): Hej, dzięki za rozwiązywanie uwag w Jaśle, bo jest tego sporo.

Drobna prośba tylko o stosowanie nazw firm i sklepów zgodnie z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy

Chodzi głównie o:
- tag 'name' obejmuje tylko nazwę własną; kategoria obiektu nie powinna być elementem nazwy ('warzywniak', 'sklep' itp. nie wchodzi w skład name). Jeśli punkt nie ma wyraźnej nazwy własnej, można dodać tag name:signed=no
- nie zapisujemy nazw capslockiem, nawet jeśli taki jest zapis na szyldzie czy stronie firmy 

Dzięki!
little_maper (2026-03-15 09:56:01+00:00): Hello JohnnyDoes,
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap in Iraq. I noticed you changed some highway classifications to a service
Examples of highways :
way 1488669621, way 1488669620, way 1487919248, way 1459542302
and caused a break in the highways classification network. In my opinion, in this case, we need to change the classification way 1488669620 to trunk, way 1488669621 to secondary, and way 1487919248, way 1459542302 to trunk_link.
Could you check it and fix it, please?
Regards,
little_maper
fluffycupcakes (2026-03-13 20:02:34+00:00): Hello. It seems you forgot to square buildings you mapped? You can square them in iD with "Q" button with building selected.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179826750
fluffycupcakes (2026-03-13 20:02:35+00:00): Hello. It seems you forgot to square buildings you mapped? You can square them in iD with "Q" button with building selected.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179826750
felipeeugenio (2026-03-14 13:43:30+00:00): Hola. Las casas puedes modelarlas una sola vez, cuadrarlas con la letra Q, y luego simplemente copiarlas. Estas que agregaste parecen ser hechas a mano.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179827109
NeisBot (2026-03-13 20:09:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13646001062 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Optica"
---
Por exemplo, uma versão mais neutra e factual do seu texto poderia ser: "Óptica"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-22 05:33:10+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180234247
(Delete spam tags. First version)
NieWnen (2026-03-13 21:22:09+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tych nazw name:de?

Takie masowe dodawanie warto najpierw przedyskutować na forum, albo przynajmniej na discordzie.
Ótzï fón GlüϷgor (2026-03-13 21:27:58+00:00): Z Wikipedii. Oto pełna lista:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Landkreise_in_Ostpreußen

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geschichte_der_Kreisbildung_in_Deutschland

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provinces_of_Prussia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Prussia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partitions_of_Poland
OlasMapy (2026-03-13 21:35:00+00:00): Jak coś ma swoją nazwę trzeba ją dodać np. Bromberg dla mojego miasta, Bydgoszczy
NieWnen (2026-03-13 21:39:17+00:00): Wskaż mi proszę w którym z tych linków widnieje "Kreis Neu-Piaseczno"
Ótzï fón GlüϷgor (2026-03-13 21:44:40+00:00): Dziękuję za zwrócenie uwagi, to moja wina. Właśnie to naprawiłem (name:de zniknęła).
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-13 21:50:56+00:00): Popraw proszę też inne fikcyjne nazwy.

A, ogólnie kopiowanie z Wikipedii jest problematyczne licencyjnie.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-17 11:04:51+00:00): > Popraw proszę też inne fikcyjne nazwy.

poprawiłeś inne równie fikcyjne nazwy?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-19 18:47:58+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/whats-everyones-problem-with-name-de/142456
Natfoot (2026-03-13 22:54:51+00:00): If you are using the ID editor you can square up the building by right clicking and squaring or using the "q" key.  you could also set building=house for any houses. there are also building=garage and building=shed if you want to add them. thanks for editing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179827248
dkwolf (2026-03-17 16:02:12+00:00): fixed area to just the park area and not the entire parcel owned by the town which included cemetery and transfer station.
felipeeugenio (2026-03-14 13:42:17+00:00): Se elimina x duplicado
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179827357
Dimitar155 (2026-03-13 20:52:12+00:00): В момента излиза че няма навес. Трябва да се добави shelter=yes (или в съответното поле да има тикче).
zstadler (2026-03-14 06:26:36+00:00): שלום Dored1

תודה על תרומותיך ל OSM!

כתבת שעריכה זו מייבאת מידע ממערכת GIS עירונית.

בגלל החשיבות של שמירה על חופשיות המידע ב OSM, מידע מיובא מגופים אחרים חייב להימסר עם רישיון תואם.

תוכל בבקשה לשתף את מקור המידע והרישיון או האישור שהתקבל לשימוש בו?

עריכות מסיביות ויבוא של מידע ל OSM מצריכות גם הודעה מוקדמת ואישור של הקהילה 

ראה גם:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

תודה,
zstadler

Hello Dored1,

Thank you for your contributions to OSM!

You wrote that this edit imports data from a municipal GIS system.

Because of the importance of keeping the OSM data free, it's required that information imported from other sources is provided with a compatible license.

Could you please share the data source and the license or permission you received to use it?

Massive edits and data imports to OSM also require advance notice and community approval.

See also:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Thank you,
zstadler
zstadler (2026-03-14 17:54:19+00:00): One result of not having a discussion on the import is that the new elements have improper tagging:

1. Nodes of "building=yes" ways are tagged with "building=yes" rather than have no tags.
For example,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13645971076/history/1

2. "building=yes" ways have junk tags such as "FID_1", "Shape_Area", and "Shape_Leng".
For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1488858672/history/1
PierreDuMatin (2026-03-14 14:48:22+00:00): Bonjour JL,
Merci pour tes ajouts de bâtiments.
Est-ce que je peux te demander de vérifier d'un peu plus près tes contributions qui se basent sur la détection automatique ? Tu as ajouté un bâtiment sur une route qui était en réalité un camion stationné (tout à l'ouest de la zone de modification, à côté du rond-point Marie Curie; je l'ai supprimé).
Je remarque que les tracés ne suivent pas vraiment l'imagerie dès que les bâtiments ne sont pas rectangulaires, mais c'est une limite de la technologie dont je ne te tiens pas rigueur.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179827529
felipeeugenio (2026-03-14 13:43:55+00:00): se elimina objeto inexistente
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179827672
maro21 (2026-03-14 22:30:40+00:00): What is the source of this name?
Ótzï fón GlüϷgor (2026-03-14 22:36:28+00:00): The admin-center, since this is Środa Śląska, which has the German name Neumarkt (in Silesia), and the German translation of “powiat” is “Kreis.” And since this ‘powiat’ is called “średzki,” that translates to “Neumarkt (in Silesia) District” in German. This is particularly evident in the “name:en” field.
maro21 (2026-03-16 20:05:37+00:00): [name:xx] tags are not for translations but for exonyms. In German Wikipedia that name is not used: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powiat_%C5%9Aredzki_(Niederschlesien)
Ótzï fón GlüϷgor (2026-03-16 20:33:02+00:00): It’s quite possible that this is missing from Wikipedia, because not all eponyms are necessarily documented there (especially lesser-known ones often get overlooked). So the article you linked to is simply incomplete.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-17 00:00:39+00:00): please do not add translations based on guesses and extrapolations

this edit was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179975482

due to low quality of your name:de edits I am sking you to cease them altogether
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-17 00:00:48+00:00): due to low quality of your name:de edits I am asking you to cease them altogether
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-19 18:48:03+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/whats-everyones-problem-with-name-de/142456
AndyB_66 (2026-03-14 10:01:09+00:00): Twój opis zestawu zmian nie jest zalecany: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-15 23:10:47+00:00): 

Why you think it has currently a name in German?
Ótzï fón GlüϷgor (2026-03-16 07:12:15+00:00): Because this term is still actively used among displaced Germans. Additionally, the district also has a name:ru, name:uk, and name:en, where this question is even more relevant.
Ótzï fón GlüϷgor (2026-03-16 07:14:34+00:00): Often, people in companies also have trouble pronouncing Polish names correctly, so out of respect for the Polish language, they avoid using them.
Yunkers (2026-03-17 10:03:01+00:00): Pracuję z ludźmi z zagranicy - nikt tak nie robi. Zawsze używają polskich nazw. 
A na pewno nie używają nazw które nie istnieją od 100 lat.
Ótzï fón GlüϷgor (2026-03-17 10:10:28+00:00): Pracuję w Niemczech i przynajmniej ja nigdy nie słyszałem, żeby ktoś mówił po niemiecku „powiat wągrowiecki”. Poza tym nazwa ta jest nadal używana w grupach niemieckojęzycznych (uznanych mniejszościach), więc jest to eksonim i name:de.
Yunkers (2026-03-17 10:34:03+00:00): Oczywiście że nikt nie mówi "powiat wągrowiecki" bo nawet w Polsce stosunkowo rzadko używa się nazw powiatów w mowie codziennej. W Niemczech prawdopodobnie od lat nikt nie użył ani polskiej ani niemieckiej ani innej nazwy powiatów.
Ótzï fón GlüϷgor (2026-03-17 10:36:59+00:00): Tak, nazwy okręgów są nadal w użyciu. Zwłaszcza w kwestiach logistycznych.
Ótzï fón GlüϷgor (2026-03-17 10:38:48+00:00): To właśnie stanowi źródło lokalnej wiedzy
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-19 18:47:59+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/whats-everyones-problem-with-name-de/142456
K12230LF (2026-03-30 08:59:08+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez a priori supprimé building:part=porch pour https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/76026139 dans ce changeset. Etait-ce volontaire ?
Elarayn (2026-03-31 18:48:59+00:00): Bonjour,
Oui, c’est volontaire car l’usage de building et building:part sur un même objet n’est pas conforme, ils doivent être cartographiés séparément.
K12230LF (2026-04-02 16:46:50+00:00): On est d'accord que du coup l'information building:part=porch a disparu ? Ou vous comptiez la rajouter sous une autre forme ? Pourquoi ne pas avoir supprimé building=yes à la place ?
Elarayn (2026-04-02 18:11:43+00:00): Oui suppression volontaire car supprimer building= ferait disparaître l’affichage de l’objet sur la carte, ce que je voulais éviter. L’usage de building=porch me semble plus approprié.
NeisBot (2026-03-13 20:48:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/351047778 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Language Institute"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-22 05:33:10+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180234248
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
Syl (2026-03-14 08:45:29+00:00): Bonjour, je ne pense pas que les espaces de verdure place de l'Hôtel de Ville puissent être qualifiés de jardins paysagers. L'attribut que j'avais mis précédemment me semble plus adapté.
Toto2642 (2026-03-14 12:10:47+00:00): Ah ok pardon, je trouvais que la description convenait pas trop mal pour le coup 🤔

"Located in public areas such as universities, parks, business parks, retail centers, residential planned developments, and landscaped medians along a divided highway. It will contain ornamental plants, often flower beds, to beautify the landscape."

Tu ne penses pas ? 🤔
Syl (2026-03-17 09:07:27+00:00): Effectivement la description de garden:type=landscaping à l'air de recouper celles de landuse=greenery et landuse=flowerbed. C'est dur de trancher. Je laisse comme ça si tu penses que c'est le mieux ici.
Toto2642 (2026-03-17 19:04:29+00:00): J'ai l'impression que ça amène _un chouïa_ plus de précision, mais bon c'est pas non plus la panacée c'est sûr 😅 Comme tu sens 🤷

Bonne semaine BTW ! 🌼
ToniE (2026-03-13 21:51:01+00:00): Servus,

die "description" ist redundant. Ich hatte das getagged, was auf dem Schild steht.

Anderes Thema: die 4 Haltestellen hier haben in OSM eine highway=platform area.
Das ist bei allen 4 aber eigentlich nur ein ganz normaler Bürgersteig (mit Busbucht: bus_bay) hat also keine dedizierte Platform-Infrastruktur, rechtfertigt mMn kein soclhes Mapping. Sieht also so aus wie die SEV-Haltestelle (Richtung  Ebersberg) im Südosten der Platzes.

Ich überlege, die 4 areas hier zu löschen, deren Tags auf die 4 highway=bus_stop nodes zu übertragen, die Relationen anzupassen.

Etwas anders sieht sieht es bei der Haltestelle '5' aus, hier auf der anderen Straßenseite.

Was ist deine Meinung?

Gruß
Toni
santon (2026-03-14 07:36:31+00:00): Stimmt, die Struktur spricht für Bürgersteig. Was wäre der Vorteil von einer Fläche gegenüber einem Punkt? Ich sehe keinen. Aber ein doppelter Eintrag Fläche plus Punkt (ohne vollständiges Tagging) halte ich für nicht hilfreich. 
Soweit ich mich von gestern erinnere (müsste noch mal hin ;-) ) ist die südliche Plattform erhöht und die Kante angeschrägt. Ist ein Mittelding aus Bügersteig und Steig. Zusätzlich gibt es einen Fußweg an den Häusern entlang.
Lange Rede kurzer Sinn: ich stimme dir zu. Der doppelte Eintrag Fläche und Punkt an einem Steig ist überflüssig. 
Grüße
Anton
ToniE (2026-03-14 07:49:51+00:00): Eher umgekehrt. 'higway=bus_stop' ist genau genommen nur für OSM Nodes definiert. 'local_ref' wird auf der Transport Karte nur gerendert, wenn es an einem node hängt. 
Die südliche Haltestelle "5" ist wie du beschreibst, quasi eine eigene Infrastruktur.
Grüße 
Toni
NeisBot (2026-03-13 21:06:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13574418164 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Furniture store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-14 05:33:17+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-06 09:11:43+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185184925
Andrea Musuruane (2026-03-14 08:44:26+00:00): not:operator:wikidata=Q1060049?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179829221
AwFi (2026-03-14 11:01:54+00:00): Hai ragione, è un errore. Probabilmente ho cliccato "tag as not RFI" invece che ignora nel warning. Putroppo iD si deve ancora aggiornare con i cambiamenti del NSI.
AwFi (2026-03-14 11:04:58+00:00): Corretto con https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179850779
Kamil Kalata (2026-03-13 22:38:57+00:00): Witaj!
Chciałbym zwrócić Tobie uwagę, że Mapy Google to niedozwolone źródło (źwięźle jest to wytłumaczone na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google). Zastanawiam się również, czy masz zgodę od autora filmiku, który wykorzystałeś do zmapowania cmentarza, gdyż ta zmiana jest utworem zależnym (https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utwór_zależny).
eggie (2026-03-14 07:14:22+00:00): Dag camelino.
Probeer als het kan bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode.
Mvg,
eggie
camelino (2026-03-14 12:20:12+00:00): 👍
NeisBot (2026-03-13 21:24:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13646149470 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Pool and snooker club"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-22 05:33:11+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179831145
Grass-snake (2026-03-14 21:50:12+00:00): Здравствуйте, Ваша правка была отменена, так как запрещено копировать из Яндекс карт (кроме панорам).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B4%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%BA%D0%B0_1.3.1
NeisBot (2026-03-13 21:54:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13538425785 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Boutique store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-22 05:33:12+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180234249
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
barefootstache (2026-03-15 22:57:42+00:00): Der Unterstand von den Bushaltestellen sind keine Gebäuden, daher ist building=yes falsch.
NeisBot (2026-03-13 21:57:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13547093779 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bakery shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-22 05:33:15+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180234253
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Grass-snake (2026-03-14 21:50:10+00:00): Здравствуйте, Ваша правка была отменена, так как запрещено копировать из Яндекс карт (кроме панорам).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B4%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%BA%D0%B0_1.3.1
Grass-snake (2026-03-14 21:50:07+00:00): Здравствуйте, Ваша правка была отменена, так как запрещено копировать из Яндекс карт (кроме панорам).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B4%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%BA%D0%B0_1.3.1