piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
one_electro_dan (2026-03-14 18:54:59+00:00): Salut! Dacă le pui tag-ul living_street, atunci viteza nu trebuie să depășească 20 km/h, așa cum spune legislația din România (și OSMwiki) pentru zonele rezidențiale.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street

Viteza de 50 km/h sau de 30 km/h nu este corectă pe un living_street (zonă rezidențială).

Nu cred că străduțele acelea sunt proprietate privată. Am văzut că străduțele din Sinaia au indicatorul „Accesul interzis” însoțit de panoul adițional „Cu excepția riveranilor”, deci un tag mai potrivit este motor_vehicle=destination în loc de access=private.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:motor_vehicle%3Ddestination
rarad74 (2026-03-15 07:18:53+00:00): Salut. Nu e chiar asa. Cica dupa o cautare pe goog;e: "    Drumuri private deschise circulației publice: Dacă un drum este privat (ex: parcarea unui supermarket, drumul de acces într-un complex rezidențial neîngrădit), dar este accesibil publicului larg, limitele oficiale de viteză se aplică [Oug 195/2002]. Administratorul drumului (proprietarul) poate stabili limite inferioare, dar regulile rutiere generale sunt valabile, iar poliția poate interveni în caz de accident sau încălcare gravă a regulilor [Oug 195/2002].
    Drumuri private închise circulației: Dacă drumul este proprietate privată, îngrădit și accesul este restricționat (ex: o curte privată, o platformă industrială securizată), regulile de circulație rutieră nu se aplică în sensul sancționării de către poliția rutieră [Oug 195/2002]. Acolo se aplică regulile stabilite de proprietar.
    Limitele generale: În absența unor indicatoare care să impună o limită specifică pe drumul privat, se aplică regulile generale (50 km/h în localitate, de exemplu) dacă drumul este considerat parte a infrastructurii rutiere publice [Oug 195/2002].

În concluzie, da, există o limită oficială de viteză pe drumurile private dacă acestea sunt deschise circulației publice." Doar daca sunt deschise circulatiei publice cu acordul proprietarului. Culmea e ca astia zic ca in lipsa unor indicatoare se poaye pune limita standard  de 50 la ora. Tot ei zic ca, daca drumul nu este deschis publicului - adica e in curtea cuiva, atunci nu exista o limita, polittia nu poate interveni sa aplice legea in ca de accident, etc. Asa ca, desi eu puneam din obisnuinta 30 cum e in unele din marile orase, pana la urma consider ca in curtile oamenilor nu trebuie pusa nicio limita. Pana la urma e proprietatea lui si face ce vrea.  O zi buna.
TinPetreković (2026-03-13 17:27:06+00:00): The node that was accidentally created has been removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179763286
Bienson (2026-03-07 23:07:19+00:00): Hier hast du nun den Friedhofsweg mit den unterirdischen Gleisen der U42 verknüpft.
FroschForscher (2026-03-14 20:22:55+00:00): Hallo artifox1,
du hat "Dr. med. Peter Flohr" als Krankenhaus mit stationärer Aufnahme eingetragen. Ist das korrekt oder ist es "nur" eine Arztpraxis bzw. ein Krankenhaus mit ambulanter Behandlung?

FroschForscher
TinPetreković (2026-03-08 08:59:59+00:00): The node that was accidentally created has been removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179523215
rskedgell (2026-03-09 11:16:33+00:00): If you want to indicate that there is a pavement at he side of the road, there is the sidewalk=* tag for this.
Andrew Walsh (2026-03-09 20:32:35+00:00): Thanks! I'll have a look at that. That might be better than what I did.
Đuro Jiří (2026-03-08 20:45:30+00:00): Este edificio fue demolido hace tres meses. ¿Hay un nuevo edificio en su lugar?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/254055531
JakovRajić (2026-03-10 11:47:03+00:00): Tagged one unnecessary segment; removed in changeset/179633389
NeisBot (2026-03-07 19:21:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/154856451 v7

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Consulting office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-16 05:33:02+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179507101
NeisBot (2026-03-07 19:30:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/154856451 v8

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Advertising agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-16 05:33:03+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179507356
JakovBušić (2026-03-08 12:22:59+00:00): Hgv restriction was removed from the south part of the Webster Avenue in changeset 179530938 because there were no according signs. "OptimoRoute"
あじさか (2026-03-09 04:53:36+00:00): Hi, talbertdoi
The roads in this area were already properly aligned.
Please avoid arbitrarily moving existing roads.

Could you please revert these edits?
OlasMapy (2026-03-08 15:19:32+00:00): alior juz od kilku lat nie istnieje
NeisBot (2026-03-07 20:15:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/460053819 v3 | 10 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/4557393546 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179508684
iandees (2026-03-07 20:19:02+00:00): Hi! It looks like node 4557393546 was accidentally moved in this changeset. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
残阳逐流 (2026-03-26 09:09:26+00:00): 211国道彭水县城的过境段，经个人实地考证当地的路牌指示，实际上其路线为西线下南城隧道—两江大桥—彭水西收费站，并非你们编辑中的东线从城区中直接穿过。
重庆规划自然资源局的绘图在这一段有误，实际上211国道在这一段并不是图中的走向
davidxuang (2026-03-26 09:58:10+00:00): revert 掉了。这样一来 S522 从哪里过境又成了问题……
Joe-w (2026-04-14 16:02:35+00:00): Hi Guy,
Just to let you know, I've partially reverted this in c181330596, as I believe the rug store is still there and Fit20 is around the back. :)
iandees (2026-03-07 21:16:38+00:00): Hi! It looks like node 2473008067 was accidentally moved in this changeset. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
JeroenHoek (2026-03-08 08:12:00+00:00): In het lijstje van nodes valt op dat de spelling van de naam wisselt tussen '30ml' en '30ML'. Is dat correct?
emvee (2026-03-08 11:49:07+00:00): 70% van de bestaande node was getagd als 30ml, alleen twee 30ML.

Verder, als je https://30ml.nl/ opent is de titel van het window voor mij 30ml Coffee & Food.

Meer heel consequent is het allemaal niet, ik zie in het lijstje nodes hieronder ook nog tweemaal 30ML en dat laat ik maar zo.
Stalker61 (2026-04-22 18:24:01+00:00): Здравствуйте.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway
Для обозначения улиц городов (такого же класса как residential), выделенных для пешеходов. Улица это не тротуар, а кроме всего прочего имеет название!
Ltrlg (2026-03-13 19:53:06+00:00): Idéalement, il faut aussi ajouter building=service pour ce type de postes électriques.
TheSwavu (2026-03-07 22:31:21+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your edit. When you are adding a POI to OSM it is helpful to check and see if it has already been mapped. If it has been then you should edit the existing POI.

I have done that here by moving your information to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/683851397

Happy mapping.
TheSwavu (2026-03-07 22:34:10+00:00): In this case it looks like there was already a duplicate. The node version was added 12 years ago and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/683851397 7 years ago.

Apologies for the confusion. It doesn't help new mappers if the data is already not quite right.
b-jazz (2026-03-17 00:20:11+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1486374280 et al

Thanks for helping map golf courses. There are some problems with your edits however and your mapping process needs to be fixed going forward so you don't continue to step on the efforts of others. For starters, you should read the following wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history on how important it is to *not* delete map elements when you should be modifying them instead. You break multipolygon relations when you delete something like a fairway that belongs to a relation only to redraw it and not properly add it back to the existing relation. You should also read the golf_course wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls) and the general wiki on how to properly work with multipolygons (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#iD). Thanks.
elgolfo (2026-03-25 10:53:54+00:00): Hallo Bambusradler,

willkommen bei OSM. Bin gerade über deine Changesets hier in der Umgebung gestolpert und dabei ist mir hier aufgefallen, dass der Bürgersteig Richtung Waltersdorfer ab  Binswangersteig nicht für Fahrräder freigegeben ist.
Würde ich noch smoothness=* und surface=asphalt bzw. surface=paving_stones spendieren.

Willst du, oder soll ich?

Viele Grüße
Moritz
Bambusradler (2026-03-25 11:43:24+00:00): Hey Moritz,
mach gerne du. Ich habe schon letztens mit dem Editor gekämpft und möchte nicht noch mehr kaputt machen
elgolfo (2026-03-26 07:50:03+00:00): Habe ich gefixt[1]. Das Wiki sagt noch, dass wenn der Bürgersteig eine eigenständige Linie ist, soll die Straße mit sidewalk:both=separate getaggt werden[2]. Das habe ich dort noch mit gemacht und den Rest entfernt, da sonst die Informationen über den Bürgersteig redundant sind.

Beste Grüße
Moritz

[1]: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=180425303
[2]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Gehsteig#Gehsteig_als_eigenst%C3%A4ndige_Linie
scrambling_panda (2026-03-14 15:06:50+00:00): Amazing Thailand does have outdoor seating! It’s in the cute little alley with the rickshaw hanging over the entrance. Course, it’s probably not open during the winter, but I used it last summer.
ianrbuck (2026-03-14 16:50:58+00:00): Very nice! I should probably stop trying to answer that question in the winter, since evidence of outdoor seating often disappears. 😅
IvaKraljić (2026-03-07 21:18:34+00:00): The wrong source tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179510771. #OptimoRoute
iandees (2026-03-07 21:37:48+00:00): Hi! It looks like node 12978608 was accidentally moved in this changeset. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
giannozzo (2026-03-08 14:39:35+00:00): Hi! Correct, it was not my intention to change any coordinates. Thanks for fixing.
IvaKraljić (2026-03-07 21:20:32+00:00): The wrong source tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179510844. #OptimoRoute
iandees (2026-03-07 21:38:22+00:00): Hi! It looks like node 10158246280 was accidentally moved in this changeset. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
NeisBot (2026-03-07 21:27:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 58 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1075417930 v1 | 12 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1355693219 v1 | 12 crossings
https://osm.org/way/175832192 v8 | 10 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/9862953898 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179510966
iandees (2026-03-07 21:38:45+00:00): Hi! It looks like node 12067202368 was accidentally moved in this changeset. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
felipeeugenio (2026-03-07 22:06:01+00:00): The guy vandalized a whole neighbourhood. I reverted the whole changeset.

regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179510966
SharpeSerana (2026-03-08 00:35:06+00:00): Bonjour, 
Voir dans ma réponse dans mon groupe de modifications, mais je peux t'assurer que ça passe à 300 km/h aujourd'hui. J'y suis passé en fin d'année dernière sur un aller retour Paris Metz et on y a bien roulé à 300 km/h. D'ailleurs, plusieurs vidéos sur YouTube montrent le passage à 300 km/h à Chauconin dans les deux sens.
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 13:54:53+00:00): The unnecessary source tag has since been deleted in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179640704. #OptimoRoute
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 13:56:53+00:00): The unnecessary split has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179640792. #OptimoRoute
iandees (2026-03-07 22:22:02+00:00): Hi! It looks like node 10151469143 was accidentally moved in this changeset. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
gurglypipe (2026-03-07 22:08:29+00:00): Wow, good effort!
infeeeee (2026-04-17 12:01:51+00:00): Szia!

Istvántelek már szerepelt a térképen területként is: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3232053

Töröltem az általad létrehozott duplikátumot.
balint36 (2026-05-07 19:11:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13625784847
Milyen vasútállomás?
Miranda Dickinson (2026-03-12 16:19:52+00:00): v1 polygon added based on aerial imagery
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 13:58:49+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179640890. #OptimoRoute
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 14:00:04+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179640947. #OptimoRoute
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 14:56:31+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179640992. #OptimoRoute
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 14:56:34+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179641139. #OptimoRoute
Miranda Dickinson (2026-03-12 16:20:25+00:00): v1 polygon added based on aerial imagery
Alexmol (2026-03-09 22:26:03+00:00): Please don't add sockets the the charging_station area, the sockets are allready mapped on the individual charge_points inside the charging_station.

Doing so will duplicate features and bring errors while counting sockets.

Alexandre
stillhart (2026-03-10 07:14:23+00:00): The wiki article contradicts that. Same as a map consumer, I really think it‘s useful and practical to have the summary of chargers on a node/area. I suggest do discus this there or on the community website ( 1 of 1000 charger discussions :-) )

My analogy would be parking spaces, which belong to a parking. We do not expect the map consumers to count spaces inside the parking, instead we use the capacity. I consider the sockets as capacity.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
Alexmol (2026-03-10 22:29:02+00:00): OK, I just find the whole semicolon separated values very clumsy when a charging station has different values of power and amperage on several charge points. 
But if you think it is valueable information I'll add it back to the stations you edited, just give me some time to update automated scripts that extract data from OSM and I check all charging stations mapped in Portugal so that the script doesn't double count connectors on the same station (mapped on the area and mapped on the charge points).

I'll get back to you soon
Alexandre
Alexmol (2026-03-11 20:46:08+00:00): Hi,
I've added back the socket count and power on the Superchargers amenity=charging_station in Portugal.
I've put the correct values for Montemor and Alcantarilha, which you had incorrectly at 250kW.

Alexandre
stillhart (2026-03-14 10:17:22+00:00): Thank you for fixing my mistake and adding back the (less accurate) summaries. For me it's just very important to get to charging infrastructure mapped right and also more or less easy readable. For electric car drivers it often matters a lot how big and fast a charging station is. And there are a 1000 proprietary apps having localized data, but it sucks as tourist. So really wish for osm to be the leader here :-)
Alexmol (2026-03-14 10:38:09+00:00): Please check out my 100% OSM based map of charging stations in Portugal at:
https://carregadorespt.blogspot.com/

Do you think it is understandable for non-portuguese speakers or it needs an english version ?
stillhart (2026-03-15 19:05:44+00:00): easy understandable for me :-)
felipeeugenio (2026-03-08 12:43:44+00:00): Hola. Un guest house quizás¿

pero no es un wilderness hut. saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179512767
Semillero LATAM (2026-03-09 11:38:33+00:00): Hola Felipe, tienes toda la razon, no sé que paso aqui, estaba poniendo detalles en Every Door tambien. No recuerdo haber puesto wilderness hut.
5m4u9 (2026-03-08 01:07:56+00:00): A ene/2026 en imágenes Mapbox Satellite no hay ningún trabajo de construcción.

Cambié los dos a propuesta (proposed:aeroway) que es lo más correcto. Creo que habría que mejorar el nombre...
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 14:56:38+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179641213. #OptimoRoute
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 17:14:58+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179641288. #OptimoRoute
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-03-22 02:55:02+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن عشوائية وغير صحيحة للخريطة
Miranda Dickinson (2026-03-12 16:20:33+00:00): v1 polygon added based on aerial imagery
Miranda Dickinson (2026-03-12 16:20:40+00:00): v1 polygon added based on aerial imagery
Miranda Dickinson (2026-03-12 16:20:47+00:00): v1 polygon added based on aerial imagery
osmviborg (2026-03-08 08:20:05+00:00): Danish rule: Don't tag POI's with addresses. In DK addresses are kept on the imported address nodes only.
zyxzyx (2026-03-08 08:52:12+00:00): I revert it because it bends road improperly.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179523014
BCNorwich (2026-03-17 07:59:53+00:00): Duplicated highway removed.
StreetSurveyor (2026-03-14 22:15:27+00:00): For roads that are still being built, it’s usually better to tag them as highway=construction (road under construction) rather than just access=no. That helps data users understand the road is temporarily closed due to construction rather than simply restricted. Just a suggestion for future edits—thanks for contributing!
rskedgell (2026-03-09 10:00:24+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Thanks for updating this, although you may have misunderstood the access tagging.

The sign at the start of the bus lane on the A33 southbound after the junction with Bennet Road is TSRGD diagram 959B, with only a bus symbol and no time plate (i.e. it applies at all times). In OSM terms, this is tagged as vehicle=no + bus=designated
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.425611&lng=-0.9801714999999831&z=19.126492453401493&pKey=1430615991434858&focus=photo


access=no is usually wrong for a highway unless it's a long term closure to all transport modes
bicycle=yes is incorrect here, as the bus lane only permits buses.
foot=no other than on motorways requires a traffic order and an explicit sign prohibiting pedestrians, which is not the case here
motor_vehicle=designated does not mean "for designated vehicles only" (this would usually be motor_vehicle=private ), but "legally designated as a right of way for *all* motor vehicles"
vehicle=bus doesn't mean anything (that's what bus=* is for), the original vehicle=no was correct

Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179573060

Please also see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Busmiles.uk

Also, the name=* tag should only be used for the actual name of a road, not a description (you can use description=* for that)
tomhukins (2026-03-27 11:42:36+00:00): Thank you for your diligent work adding detail to the map.

Have you heard people call this area "Sandbed" recently?  I've never encountered the name and I'm unsure if it's used today, in which case it doesn't belong on the map.
matty817 (2026-03-27 12:18:21+00:00): Hm, no. This one should probably be deleted then. Or since it appears on OS OpenMap Local as recently as six months ago, I can turn it into a node with no tags other than a note warning it's a historical name?
tomhukins (2026-03-27 12:40:30+00:00): Thank you for the quick reply.

Lots of names appear in OS OpenMap Local that nobody uses any more, so they don't belong on a contemporary map - https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ exists for such things.

If you really want to keep it on the map, I suggest using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:old_name rather than adding a note to explain the odd use of "name".
matty817 (2026-03-27 22:19:38+00:00): Cheers! Removed it in ch180523388; using old_name here just seems like clutter.
Taya_S (2026-03-08 18:18:41+00:00): Reverted questionable edit with a link to an iplogger in the changeset description

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179545762
DressyPear4 (2026-07-27 11:58:38+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186452689
DressyPear4 (2026-07-27 11:58:36+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186452689
DressyPear4 (2026-07-27 11:58:37+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186452689
DressyPear4 (2026-07-27 11:58:35+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186452689
Glassman (2026-03-09 00:08:09+00:00): The acceptiable tag is access=private.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179515326
DressyPear4 (2026-07-27 12:41:36+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186454696
DressyPear4 (2026-05-24 12:05:13+00:00): Rio não é aqueduto
felipeeugenio (2026-03-08 12:12:00+00:00): Hol. La dea del punto de los place= es que estén en lugares donde la gente pueda decir que llegó al lugar, sobre todo con lugares habitados.
Cual es la idea de agregar el Porvenir en medio de un potrero. Dejémoslo en la entrada del condominio mejor.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179515461
felipeeugenio (2026-03-08 12:18:32+00:00): Hola Bustte.
OpenStreetMap es un trabajo comunitario en el que participa toda una comunidad de maperos chilenos. Si bien sus ediciones son valiosas porque han aportado información, algunos maperos le han hecho comentarios tras ellas, que no siempre han sido ejecutadas correctamente.

Esto es normal en quienes comienzan y tus errores no han sido graves; lo que te pedimos es un poco de empatía porque quieres corregir los errores y quienes editan en el mismo lugar que tú. Te llegó un correo invitándote al chat de la comunidad. No es obligatorio participar, pero, después de un tiempo, el silencio es mejor evitarlo.

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=23567067

Te agradecemos, por favor, revisar todos los comentarios que te han hecho. Para que cuando corrijamos algo no te veamos repetirlo en la próxima edición.

Gracias
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179515461