piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ElliottPlack (2024-07-09 06:23:28+00:00): Hi there. In this changeset you've edited the boundary of "Unincorporated Colma" to include the admin_level=8 tag. This is inappropriate for an unincorporated area. admin_level=8 are reserved for areas with a town government (e.g., a mayor and city council). This unincorporated area should either be removed entirely or not be tagged as an incorporated town.

Thanks!

Elliott Plack
OSMF Data Working Group
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-01 09:31:07+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Osiedle Piastów":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262390409
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288620180
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288620181

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kubahahaha (2024-06-02 12:59:19+00:00): Dodałem miejsce o odpowiedniej nazwie i przeniosłem nazwę z addr:street do addr:place
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-01 09:31:06+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11949713341
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/893630321

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Księdza Doktora Antoniego Korczoka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11949713342

"11-go Pułku Piechoty":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1019547824
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1019547825
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1019547826
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1019547827

"Zamojska":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193987549

"Plac Kopernika":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1200824784

"Sienkiewicza":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1239583833

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-01 09:40:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Osiedle Piastów":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262391108
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288621822
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288621823
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288621824

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kubahahaha (2024-06-02 12:59:21+00:00): Dodałem miejsce o odpowiedniej nazwie i przeniosłem nazwę z addr:street do addr:place
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-01 09:50:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Osiedle Piastów":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262390956
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262391622
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288623039
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288623040
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288623041

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kubahahaha (2024-06-02 12:59:24+00:00): Dodałem miejsce o odpowiedniej nazwie i przeniosłem nazwę z addr:street do addr:place
literan (2024-06-02 16:23:44+00:00): еще раз: не надо вносить банкоматы, недоступные людям с улицы
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-01 09:50:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Osiedle Piastów":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262390636
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262390940
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288617438
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288623796
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288623797
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288623798
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288623801

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kubahahaha (2024-06-02 12:59:27+00:00): Dodałem miejsce o odpowiedniej nazwie i przeniosłem nazwę z addr:street do addr:place
eggie (2024-06-01 10:24:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. 
Al eerder HotOSM gemapt, maar nu dan in Nederland.
Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
HannekePan (2024-06-27 11:23:51+00:00): Hi, 
Dank je! Sorry voor de late reactie, beetje veel aan het hoofd :-) 
Groet, 
Hanneke
JulesGabrielVerne (2024-06-26 11:24:12+00:00): Kolego, dlaczego ścieżki leśne zamieniasz na drogi leśne? Oznaczasz ścieżki po których niema możliwości wjechania samochodem na drogi leśne. Przykłady:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/848397947
lub https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498483956
lub https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110576143
mcliquid (2024-06-17 09:00:32+00:00): Doesn't Romanian have its own spelling for all the German names? And if not, where is the added value in this challenge to set all the same names for name:ro again?
Buraddo (2024-06-17 19:46:53+00:00): Hello mcliquid,
Romanian doesn't usually change the spelling of German names, only for some old well-known cities that have had a historical connection.
I had read more about the "Multilingual names" in OSM and it seems that it is not a good practice to just repeat names in every language if it is not translated in any way, so you are right, this is not the most correct way to tag.
The Maproulette challenge has been a little confusing, it is giving you suggestions regarding the correct spelling in Romanian and I just accepted the suggestions for all the places that are spelled like that in Romanian (even if this means not changing it in most cases).
For Vaduz I would argue that there is some added value as Romanian "Vaduz" is pronounced differently than German "Vaduz"
Lejun (2024-06-25 11:33:22+00:00): C’est curieux que t’aies pu faire ça via StreetComplete, je repasserai nettoyer depuis mon PC à l’occas’
aTarom (2024-06-01 12:25:47+00:00): Bienvenido, tienes en cuenta la  Ley de
Delimitación Comarcal de Aragón? estoy viendo que por ejemplo en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/364850506
cambias el valor del name por el que no está en dicha ley, que fuente estás usando? estoy equivocado?
Si no se rectifica, no aportas documentación o no participas educadamente en los canales de la comunidad para debatirlo seriamente, paso a considerarlo un acto vandálico.
Si tampoco estás conforme con dejar solo el wikidata, donde puedes elegir en que idioma leerla, y así evitar guerra de ediciones en el tag wikipedia, pues coméntalo y seguro que encontramos solución no?
PD: Te aseguro que no padezco de "histeria pancatalanista"
Jordi MF (2024-06-01 17:48:31+00:00): ¿Por qué haces referencia al usuario 'Belmontes y otros' si eres tú mismo?
NeisBot (2024-06-01 10:12:24+00:00): Hi Daniel Raggasonico D'alessio, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1288629334

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-01 10:21:33+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/152114043

The user immediately deleted her/his own beach.
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-01 10:23:18+00:00): Please don't add fictional map elements. Thank you!
Matija Nalis (2025-12-29 22:49:18+00:00): Hi, about year and a half ago you've marked this railway crossing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/341808867 as `double_half`.
Do you recall what was your source / are you sure it's not regular crossing:barrier=half ? Thanks!
Vedran V (2025-12-30 04:35:09+00:00): Fixed it!
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-01 10:22:08+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152114434
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-01 10:23:12+00:00): Please don't add fictional map elements. Thank you!
Supaplex (2024-06-01 11:20:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288631159
怎麼用簡體字，台灣不是用簡體字的
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152114168
user_17098649 (2024-06-01 12:02:08+00:00): 抱歉，有幾個字沒註意到😁
Taksine (2025-07-01 04:59:33+00:00): 你好，这一块应该还是在中国大陆境内，为何加上英文？
LokNeko (2025-07-01 07:42:02+00:00): 模仿港澳模式，心血来潮加的，就这一小块区域。
Jochen Topf (2024-06-02 08:05:34+00:00): These changes totally broke the coastline. The coastline must always be a continuous line, but your coastline isn't and it is not connected properly to the one that was there before. Please fix this.
NeisBot (2024-06-01 10:30:28+00:00): Hi monkeyman77, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/way/839627224
https://osm.org/way/839616621
https://osm.org/way/91321241
https://osm.org/way/90162854

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
NeisBot (2024-06-01 10:43:49+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152115276
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-01 10:44:07+00:00): Please don't add fictional map elements. Thank you!

#vandalism
eggie (2024-06-01 10:48:00+00:00): Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits.  
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen.  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-06-01 10:53:21+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=152114672

Ook heb je adressen samengevoegd zonder noodzaak aan de Wierdijk.
eggie (2024-06-02 07:10:41+00:00): Nog een tip...  De stranden aan het Markermeer zijn er inderdaad, maar we gebruiken geen name=..... om iets te beschrijven.
De stranden aan de Wierbalg zijn er echt niet.
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=02-06-2023&loc=52.67886%2C5.087324%2C19z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2024-05-21&acqid=20240521_103447_PNEO-03_1_1&sensor=Pleiades-NEO


MVG
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-02 09:10:21+00:00): construction tags also should be removed, right?

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4785029
silversurfer83 (2024-06-02 16:26:23+00:00): Hi there :)

still trying to help you get better :)

This power line here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288634192 crosses a highway. If those objects aren't connected you should give at least on of them (best would be the line) a layer tag (here "layer=1" would be nice). That way everyone knows that the line crosses the road in thie air.
You should have gotten a warning from you editor before you uploaded. Please check those before saving your work.

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152114726
DD1GJ (2024-06-01 11:03:40+00:00): Revert vandalism
silversurfer83 (2024-06-02 16:22:47+00:00): And me again :)

nice bunch of fences but no gates to pass through. There's also street level images available so check those out (bing, kartaview, mapillary) and maybe add those gates, too.
thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152115033
DD1GJ (2024-06-01 11:04:18+00:00): Revert, vandalism
DD1GJ (2024-06-01 11:04:37+00:00): Revert, vandalism
silversurfer83 (2024-06-02 16:20:30+00:00): Hi

the river terminus of the pipeline does look pretty square in the aerial images so maybe try and use the button "Q" to square all angles. 
Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152115237
DD1GJ (2024-06-01 11:07:44+00:00): Revert, vandalism

Hallo IDerFeind, OSM ist kein Spielzeug. Weitere Informatioenen findest Du unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
silversurfer83 (2024-06-02 16:18:13+00:00): Hi Marius

this fence https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288636053 crosses a highway without a connecting node and without information on how the highway passes through the fence. Can you please make sure to use a fitting barrier tag at the intersection and if you're unsure please leave a fixme or a note

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152115451
söm4324 (2024-06-25 17:51:35+00:00): Hallo brauboy, willkommen bei Openstreetmap!

Ich wollt kurz horchen, was es mit diesem Hofladen auf sich hat, den du eingetragen hattest:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11949849059

An der Straßenecke ist nichts derartiges. Was genau wolltest du eintragen?

Viele Grüße!
söm4324 (2024-07-01 13:39:06+00:00): Schade, keine Antwort.

Ich habe den Hofladen entfernt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153413369
mcliquid (2024-06-20 13:17:17+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
kagebar (2024-06-04 10:21:41+00:00): будь-ласка не використовуйте оверлей Strava для позначення шляхів, якщо самі не можете підтвердити їх існування. Зтикався не раз, коли проводили якісь змагання, на страві видно, а по факту там не має й натяку на стежку
HeikoTheissen (2024-06-01 11:25:37+00:00): Schließt eine Lücke, die von https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152115298 gelassen wurde.
Leo Slager (2024-06-02 13:30:07+00:00): You damaged 15 routerelations.

I will revert all of these changesets.
Leo Slager (2024-06-02 13:33:50+00:00): Op de ringbaan Zuid heb je alle rijstroken apart ingetekend als highway. Je kunt daar niet meer van rijstrook wisselen en dus wordt het onmogelijk om een route te volgen.
Eén highway omvat meerdere rijstroken en dat was al correct aangegeven op de kaart.
Het is of onwetendheid hoe wegen te mappen of het is puur vandalisme.
Please stop mapping in the Netherlands !
Leo Slager (2024-06-02 14:34:13+00:00): Reverted with my changeset 152160662, due to severe damage to the map and the routerelations.
Leo Slager (2024-06-02 23:34:32+00:00): Verder contact via PB
VictorIE (2024-06-02 09:06:52+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288643916

What does this represent?
SKald (2024-06-10 06:47:17+00:00): "Voitsdorf" ist nicht der Strassenname. Die Adresse kommt vom Ortsnamen. Die Strassen sind somit namenlos, was auch bereits durch das noname=yes ausgedrückt war. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Austria#Stra%C3%9Fennamen

Bitte korrigeren.
tommturbo (2024-06-10 14:45:54+00:00): Ok, danke für die Info! Ändere es wieder zurück
SKald (2024-06-10 16:03:25+00:00): Danke und viel Spaß noch!
A67-A67 (2024-06-01 11:45:03+00:00): Beschrijving: Bebouwde kom en details toegevoegd.
Bron: PDOK-luchtfoto;Mapillary
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-01 12:00:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288645312

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-01 12:10:25+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288646512

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
VladaC (2024-06-02 21:46:23+00:00): Díky za opravu, vůbec jsem si nevšiml, že jsem ten rozcestník přidal dvakrát. Vláďa
McKulkin (2026-06-05 12:39:40+00:00): Hi. node/10769237170 to way/1157989466 is impassable. There's a 4m drop out there and there's no bypass path of any kind. Please, clarify.
nikusha (2026-06-06 07:44:53+00:00): Edited
McKulkin (2026-06-06 14:55:01+00:00): Much appreciated!
Filip009 (2024-06-04 19:47:07+00:00): Zdravím, telefónne čísla prosím uvádzajte v medzinárodnom formáte. +421 XXX XXX XXX.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-01 12:20:28+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288647647

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
underscore_en (2024-06-01 13:01:12+00:00): removed a lot of bad mapping, already fixed it
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152119038
Frans S (2024-06-05 13:59:54+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You added a layer to a few buildings.
Why? They are build on the ground as usual.
I removed them.
Best regards
Frans S (2024-06-18 07:59:22+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Clustered buildings.
Connected nodes of buildings to each other
42 out of 168 buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152119484
KiloThree (2024-06-01 17:18:47+00:00): Hello, please keep your changesets local! It makes them easier to view in history. Since this changeset bounding box covers the entirety of the continental US, anyone looking at changesets within any city across that whole area will see this in history

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Frans S (2024-06-08 10:57:27+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please don't add a layer tag -1 to a building. Is not underground.
Just move the nodes of the crossing highway rather than hide the issue.
Best regards
Frans S (2024-06-07 15:24:16+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Building often mapped too inaccurate.
Just rectangular instead of following the rooflines.
Hardly squared buildings

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152120272
Frans S (2024-06-07 12:11:47+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Oversize mapped.
Connected nodes of buildings to other buildings.
Clustered buildings.
Buildings not squared



Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152120436
hatul (2024-07-02 10:54:34+00:00): שלום יצחק
אני מנסה להבין מה יש במקום. יש שלט שמכווין לשביל גולני?
Yitzchak M (2024-07-03 16:23:47+00:00): שלום לך, עמיעד. טיילתי ב "שביל גולני" מכיוון הצפון. המסלול במקור (במפות שלהם ושלנו) היה צמוד לכביש 6 בצד המזרח. כשהגעתי לשם, גיליתי שהשביל עצמו לא קיים. ניסיתי גם מכיוון הדרום. לא קיים בכלל. במקביל, גיליתי שיש שביל יפה צמוד לכביש 6 בצד המערב. מרוב רצון לעזור לחיילים שלנו שעושים את המסע הזה, העברתי את ה "שביל גולני" לצד המערב, ולמען החיילים שלנו הוספתי את ה "עמודים כיוון" האלה במפה כדי לכוון את החיילים למרות שהעמודים לא קיימים במציאות.
hatul (2024-07-03 20:05:40+00:00): מצטער, אבל אם אין שילוט בשטח אין מה למפות.
השביל מסומן באמצעות יחס, ואני רואה שהוא על השביל הזה. כך שאתה יכול לחפש שביל גולני ולראות בדיוק איך ללכת.
אני מוחק את השילוט שלא קיים.
(לדעתי השביל הזה מיותר לגמרי, אבל זה דיון אחר)
ianlopez1115 (2024-06-01 15:49:37+00:00): Hi,

Per this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history) "[instead] of deleting elements such as buildings or landuse and redrawing them anew, it is generally better to update the geometry of the existing objects, retaining their editing history."

Please let me know if you need help in connection to this and similar edits.

Kind regards,

Ian Lopez/ianlopez1115
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152120512
underscore_en (2024-06-01 16:16:38+00:00): ok thanks I'll use that
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152120512
Frans S (2024-06-08 11:46:33+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, please do not connect nodes of buildings to other buildings or objects.
Buildings need to be mapped separately

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152120999
simon_geovelo (2024-08-02 09:17:34+00:00): Bonjour,
Dans votre changeset, vous avez cartographier des bandes cyclable avec des attribut de piste cyclables créant ainsi de nombreux doublons. Vos contributions ne suivent pas les recommandations du wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle 
Pouriez vous corriger les données ? Je peux annuler votre changeset si l'opération est trop complexe pour vous.
Je reste à votre disposition si vous avez besoin d'accompagnement pour la cartographie des aménagements cyclable.
Cordialement
Simon