piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Langlaeufer (2025-12-07 12:31:43+00:00): Hallo Tamani,

bitte beachte, wenn du Rad- und Fußwege separat einzeichnest auch die cycleway und sidewalk Tags an der Fahrbahn. Diese müssen dann gegebenen falls angepasst werden
cycleway:side=track -> cycleway:side=separate
sidewalk=side -> sidewalk:side=separate
zudem sollten die weiteren Tags auf die separaten Linien umziehen, z.B. cycleway:surface/segreagated/traffic_sign 
Auch sollten die separaten Linien nicht einfach als Sackgasse enden sondern müssen wieder mit der Straße verbunden werden, damit die Navigation darüber möglich ist.
Falls du Fragen hast, stehe ich dir gerne zur Verfügung

Ich hab hier mal nachgearbeitet:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175620805
Langlaeufer (2025-12-07 12:33:09+00:00): und nicht vergessen die Übergänge/Verbindungen zu Ampeln/Verkehrsinseln einzuzeichnen, sonst sorgen diese separaten Weg für große Umwege in der Fuß- und Radfahrernavigation.
rarad74 (2025-12-06 07:25:45+00:00): Salut. Daca stergi componente ale cladirilor care aveau si tag-uri de inaltimie, maio mult strici. Cei care le-au facut asa, le-au facut cu scopul de a arata corect si pe f4map. De aceea exista tag-uri de culoare pt acoperisuri si de inaltime. Asa arata inainte Palatul Postelor: https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=44.4313111&lon=26.0977748&zoom=20&camera.theta=57.623&camera.phi=-2.865  Ar fi bine sa dai revert sau sa nu mai corectezi ceea ce ti se pare tie eronat, ca poate nu este.
one_electro_dan (2025-12-06 18:24:30+00:00): Salut.

Ce era în Centrul Vechi se numea tagging for the renderer. O singură clădire din realitate era cartografiată din mai multe ways cu tag-ul „building”. În multe cazuri nici nu exista un "building" care să cuprindă toată amprenta clădirii. Acele "ways" erau desenate așa, urmărind conturul părților de acoperiș. De exemplu, un acoperiș în patru ape era cartografiat din patru buildings. 

Acele „buildings” nu au fost făcute pentru 3D mapping, ele erau create doar „ca să arate bine de sus” și nu aveau alte tag-uri relevante pentru 3D mapping.

Această modalitate de cartografiere este greșită conform standardelor de pe OSM Wiki. În plus, crea mai multe probleme în Osmose: „Building intersection”, „Gap between buildings”. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Ca să rezolv asta, în general am modificat tag-ul acelor ways din „building” în „building:part”, și am creat o singură clădire care să cuprindă toată amprenta. Asta nu ar trebui să creeze probleme cu cartografierea 3D, deoarece toate proprietățile relevante sunt păstrate.

În unele cazuri nici tag-ul „building:part” nu este potrivit pentru acele ways, pentru că de multe ori reprezintă doar bucăți din acoperiș, ci nu bucăți cu proprietăți diferite din clădire. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part

În majoritatea cazurilor am păstrat acele ways, deoarece în viitor pot fi folosite ca ghid pentru o cartografiere 3D corectă a clădirii. De exemplu, la Biserica Ortodoxă Zlătari - Sfântul Ciprian am șters toate "building:parts" care erau doar părți diferite din acoperiș, dar am păstrat "building:parts" turlelor si absidei care pot fi folosite ulterior pentru 3d mapping. 

La unele clădiri mai mici sau cu acoperiș simplu, le-am șters complet și am adăugat eu "building:part" dacă/unde era cazul. Înainte de a le șterge m-am asigurat că nu aveau și alte tag-uri importante; dacă aveau (de exemplu adresă sau nume), le-am mutat pe clădirea principală creată.

Acesta este și cazul Palatului Poștelor. Am modificat „building” în „building:part” și am creat o relație multipolygon pentru clădire formata din 2 membri (outer and inner). Nu am șters alte tag-uri.

Înainte de a face asta am observat că și alții au rezolvat la fel astfel de clădiri cartografiate greșit și m-am consultat cu comunitatea pentru a vedea dacă există vreun motiv relevant pentru a păstra acele clădiri cartografiate greșit. 

Totuși, este posibil să-mi fi scăpat ceva și să fi șters unele "ways" care aveau și alte tag-uri. M-am uitat din nou prin ce am editat și nu am găsit astfel de cazuri, dar dacă tu ai observat câteva, îmi poți spune și pot adăuga la loc acele tag-uri sau pot face revert dacă și unde este cazul.
ElliottPlack (2026-03-28 20:59:00+00:00): Hi. We don't use the footway tag on natural surface trails. -Elliott Plack. OSMF Data Working Group
bartgron (2025-12-06 19:44:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
bartgron (2025-12-06 19:44:38+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
bartgron (2025-12-06 19:44:49+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-01 15:48:19+00:00): Reverted
bartgron (2025-12-06 19:45:09+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
bartgron (2025-12-06 19:45:15+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
bartgron (2025-12-06 19:45:19+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
bartgron (2025-12-06 19:45:24+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
bartgron (2025-12-06 19:45:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
bartgron (2025-12-06 19:45:39+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
bartgron (2025-12-06 19:45:46+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
bartgron (2025-12-06 19:45:53+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
bartgron (2025-12-06 19:45:58+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
bartgron (2025-12-06 19:46:03+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
bartgron (2025-12-06 19:46:09+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-01 15:38:00+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176708284
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-01 15:38:01+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176708284
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-01 15:38:02+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176708284
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-01 15:38:03+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176708284
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-01 15:35:39+00:00): К сожалению Яндекс.Карты для правок использовать нельзя
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-01 15:38:04+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176708284
Frans S (2025-12-12 09:52:42+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
B: Overlapping buildings.

C: Collected adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
G: Included the shadow of the building.
H: Included a yard of clearing.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175572341
Frans S (2025-12-12 11:52:28+00:00): Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task.
* Please accurately outline all buildings.
 * Buildings should have their corners squared.

Keep on mapping!
eggie (2025-12-06 11:08:27+00:00): Dag Fedde Lijkt me oke als het onder het begrip winkel valt.
We kennen ook nog craft=goldsmith 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft%3Dgoldsmith
Evt toevoegen...   Renderen doet het dacht ik niet.
MVG
eggie
Tjuro (2025-12-07 09:33:40+00:00): Beste Fedde89,

Is dit een winkel waar mensen naar binnen kunnen lopen?

Waar heb je deze naam op gebaseerd? Deze naam kan ik niet terug vinden op de website.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
Fedde89 (2025-12-09 06:03:54+00:00): Hallo Tjuro, 

Dit is een goudsmid atelier waar je alleen op afspraak naar binnen kunt. In dit atelier werken twee goudsmeden (Lonneke Keuten en Jacqueline Vugs), beiden met hun eigen website, email en telefoonnummer, maar op hun contact pagina's noemen ze zichzelf "Atelier Oranjestraat Goudsmederij". Het zou beter zijn om in de email en website velden naar beiden ter verwijzen, maar ik weet niet of dat mogelijk is. Alternatief is om een extra node toe te voegen. Als objecttype vond ik "juwelierszaak" het best passend, en op suggestie van Eggie heb ik craft=goldsmith toegevoegd.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Fedde
NeisBot (2025-12-06 05:46:11+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 1625 of your last 1770 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23037299
chath_tsu (2025-12-28 10:19:05+00:00): Hi! Thank you for your work updating driveway and parking lots. Your edits for the driveways/parking lots themselves are very well done. However, there is no need to add the various turn restrictions to all the possible entrances to closed ways - having access=no or motor_vehicles=no added to the closed ways will suffice. Yes it doesn't show up on iD editor's turn restriction window, but please rest assured that routing engines know how to handle it and the access tags also do show up on map renderings. Thank you and happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175572663
chath_tsu (2025-12-28 10:20:30+00:00): correction: the key should be motor_vehicle without the s
balint36 (2025-12-10 00:05:06+00:00): A 2-es vonal eddig is elég pontos volt. Milyen pontosítás volt indokolt a te véleményed szerint?
Csabi532 (2025-12-15 15:26:55+00:00): Az üzemeltetőt írtam át MÁV-ról Máv pályaműködtetési zrt.-re.
balint36 (2025-12-16 07:47:11+00:00): Itt megválaszoltam: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173672878
Frans S (2025-12-18 15:43:22+00:00): Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such as roads and paths.

Keep on mapping!
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-08 17:14:33+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175677832
tguen (2026-01-25 00:31:27+00:00): What is your source for this ALPR? I can't find any source that LiveView even makes them.
TheSwavu (2025-12-06 09:15:23+00:00): Hi, 

Phone numbers should be entered in E.123 format including the country code, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers

Thanks.
deferred2841 (2025-12-06 10:10:28+00:00): Ah I didn't realise. Sorry, I'll make sure to read the wiki.
Hufkratzer (2025-12-06 20:18:02+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456420705 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456420726 are no horse riding centers / equestrian centers; they are riding arenas / rings, Arenas / rings should be tagged like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1451542198 (leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456420727 is not a horse riding center / equestrian center; this area just contains 3 paddocks. It could be tagged with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=animal_keeping.

Compare:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/843668144 (example)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456420726 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456420727 probably belong to https://www.burragesendstables.com (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3qGLYIBuBM), which could be mapped as an additional object (node or area) and tagged as a horse riding center / equestrian center (leisure=horse_riding), or as an animal boearding facility (amenity=animal_boarding).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding#When_not_to_use says: "Use this tag only once for the whole facility, don't use it multiple times on different objects belonging to it (one feature, one OSM element rule". Misuse of the tag leisure=horse_riding for arenas, paddocks, pens and other things is the reason why it is not yet rendered on the OSM "standard" map. So please avoid that.
InfosecSnipe (2025-12-06 20:49:57+00:00): Hello,

I now see my mistake and will correct this when I get home and note this moving forward. As you are likely aware I'm new to using OSM and thought I was helping to map new spots - not realizing I was cluttering the map by tagging them wrong. I'll be sure to read the documentation on this if I make any edits to the map regarding this from now on, or just leave it to the pros for the questionable edits. I originally only joined to report Flock Safety cameras however I enjoy helping add to an open source map and the concept of it! Thank you for your comment as well as Github contributions friend!
Hufkratzer (2025-12-06 23:34:51+00:00): Thanks for the quick reply.. Yes, I saw that you are relatively new to OSM. I don't want to discourage you from continuing with OSM if you enjoy it. You are by no means the only one who has used the horse_riding tag for other things, example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4354750993#map=19/-0.863128/-78.910625&layers=P.
FajrAl (2025-12-09 02:34:16+00:00): Tolong gunakan sumber dengan tag source=* yang benar. Sumber data dapat berupa link sebagai data sekunder.
NeisBot (2025-12-13 22:44:27+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "IT support service"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-14 14:43:24+00:00): ❌ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175576041
NeisBot (2025-12-13 22:44:28+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "DMC office"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 17:19:57+00:00): 🔴 Partly reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/176016115
Langlaeufer (2026-03-02 17:17:29+00:00): Wie ist denn die Fahrradstraße genau  beschildert (Zusatzzeichen)?
Langlaeufer (2026-03-02 17:46:01+00:00): o.k gefunden, nur Anlieger und Busse frei.
mavl (2025-12-13 12:34:09+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет непрямоугольное здание.
Ozon OSM15 (2025-12-13 19:44:30+00:00): Здравствуйте. Исправила
mavl (2025-12-14 04:49:40+00:00): Вы ничего не исправили. Случилось вот что:  
1. Вы добавили непрямоугольное здание.  
2. Я исправил его углы.  
3. Вы удалили (зачем-то) это здание и добавили на его место другое. Так не делают. 

"Но, "внося свою лепту, не выноси чужую"! Если что-то следует исправить, то это нужно именно исправлять, а не удалять и рисовать заново, так как история правок объекта бывает важна для различных целей"  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C

http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=175896411  
  
4. Затем вы снова удалили (зачем-то) своё новое здание  и добавили на его место другое.  
  
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=175896490

Это очень странная последовательность действий. Когда ошибка исправлена (углы сделаны прямыми) ничего исправлять не нужно.  
Я отменил два ваших последних пакета правок (которые здесь упоминались).
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-01 21:53:49+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=hot_pot
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13357135239/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=hotpot
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
vectorial8192 (2025-12-10 12:55:07+00:00): Might be too late to type this, but some "rest areas" might be "misunderstood tagging" and should be normal parks instead.
kingkingHK (2025-12-10 13:48:07+00:00): Yes that is my guess too, which I why I changed some of them to `leisure=park` when it is "obviously" the case, the ones I deleted were unbelievable or added by users with a history of adding non-existent features.
eggie (2025-12-06 08:53:32+00:00): Mees  De projectnamen kun je beter onder description kwijt.
Dus dan niet name=.. gebruiken.
Zodra er gebouwd wordt dan is construction terecht. Ligt het in afwachting van werkzaamheden dan landuse=greenfield gebruiken.
Dat geldt ook voor Hondshoven.

MVG
eggie
Meesvansteenbergen (2025-12-06 09:34:56+00:00): Bedankt voor de tip
Svalbard (2025-12-07 12:22:17+00:00): Hallo söm4324, warst Du vor Ort oder arbeitest Du gerade flächendeckend alte Baustellen-Tags ab? Wenn Du vor Ort gewesen bist, hast Du anscheinend die aktuellen Bauarbeiten „übersehen“. Dort wird tatsächlich gerade ein mehrstöckiges Gebäude errichtet. Gruß Svalbard
söm4324 (2025-12-08 08:27:41+00:00): Hallo Svalbard,
genau, ich bin grad an dieser MapRoulette Challenge dran: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/52946
Die Fläche ist seit gut 10 Jahren als Baustelle eingetragen, allerdings zeigt kein Luftbild Bauaktivität. Daher das Entfernen des landuse=construction.

Soll ich das construction wieder eintragen, oder willst du das tun und gleich das Gebäude ergänzen?
Svalbard (2025-12-08 10:21:39+00:00): Hallo söm4324, vielen Dank für Deine Rückmeldung! Ich habe "construction" wieder eingetragen und ebenfalls eine ungefähre Gebäudefläche mit "fixme=inaccurate".  Gruß Svalbard
söm4324 (2025-12-08 11:29:26+00:00): Alles klar, danke!
KennyDap (2025-12-06 09:31:34+00:00): There's already 광화문 in this place. There's no need to repeat it a second time.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175577356
BCNorwich (2025-12-07 08:01:23+00:00): Duplicated highway sections removed. Please don't duplicate any highway, it disrupts routing.
Akira4755 (2025-12-07 08:07:24+00:00): Thanks for the correction, I'll try to be more careful. How do you identify duplicate highways? I am curious. I figured I'd finish mapping out the whole area and then do a sanity check at the end. I've been mapping this section for the past week or so, and will continue for few more days.
BCNorwich (2025-12-07 08:18:29+00:00): Hi, 
You can find duplicated highways worldwide reported daily, they are termed as duplicate edges, (blue triangles). Here's the area you're at:- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=78.73135&lat=17.26307&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

I check India and several other countries I'm interested in daily to keep routing working OK for folk.

Regards Bernard.
Akira4755 (2025-12-07 08:34:56+00:00): Ok understood. Thank you so much for sharing the tool. I'll keep this in mind.
eggie (2025-12-06 09:18:57+00:00): Hoi AIAB,

Tip bicycle en horse=no zijn default Dat hoef je niet aan te geven op voetpaden. 
access=yes hoeft ook niet op wegen.
Editor iD vraagt altijd van alles aan te vullen, maar meestal is dat overbodig.

Aan trappen kun je toevoegen incline = up of down. Ligt aan de tekenrichting.
Als voorbeeld  en voormalige Schollekop even toegevoegd. 
Een trap heb ik opgedeeld en nog een 'trap' toegevoegd. 
Groet,
eggie
AIAB (2025-12-06 09:29:34+00:00): Duidelijk, bedankt!
eggie (2025-12-06 09:21:42+00:00): Projectnamen beter onder description= zetten.
Dat zijn geen officieel geografische namen. 
MVG
eggie
Meesvansteenbergen (2025-12-06 09:34:11+00:00): Bedankt voor de tip
eggie (2025-12-06 10:10:10+00:00): Ga svp even na op Meesvansteenbergen je eigen naam is.
Sockpuppet accounts zijn niet toegestaan.
Je kunt ook kiezen voor een nickname of uiteraard je echte naam.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-06 10:17:34+00:00): Landuse construction aangepast naar greenfield .. name aangepast naar description. Nog geen bouwactiviteiten hier.

MVG
eggie
nevw (2025-12-07 14:03:37+00:00): Hi, please do not add names to the ways than form the bounds of the boundary relation or multipolygons. The name is only added to the relation and not to the individual ways that form the polygons. The outer ways are left untagged. Please read the wiki on this.
I expect that all the names you have added to the outer ways will need to be reverted.
nevw (2025-12-07 14:08:10+00:00): If a ring of the relation really has an individual name then that can be added to that particular way. But, the name of the relation should only be added to the relation and not to the outer ways.
nevw (2025-12-07 14:20:26+00:00): This is some text from osm inspector (areas)…
 Old-style multipolygons
Multipolygon relations with tags on the (outer) ways instead of on the relation. This is deprecated and should not be used any more. Move the tags from the outer ways to the relation.
michel60 (2025-12-07 07:37:30+00:00): Bonjour,
Je ne sais pas dire s'il y a un rapport avec ces modifications, mais la continuité de la ligne Relation : TER C13 : Paris Gare du Nord → Creil → Compiègne (16897497) : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16897497 est passée en défaut.
GEOFABRIK OSM Inspector l'affiche en noir : En cliquant sur le lien ci-dessous vous pourrez voir le détails de l'erreur : Way members unordered or missing	true
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=2.77923&lat=49.39617&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.70&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
En espérant que cet outils vous aidera ...
Cordialement Michel
Denis_Helfer (2025-12-07 13:58:34+00:00): Bonjour Michel,
J'ai modifié les relations P13 et C13, C14. On attendra demain pour voir ce qui est encore en erreur.
A titre personnel, je trouve ces relations fastidieuses à maintenir.
Cordialement
michel60 (2025-12-07 14:52:31+00:00): Bonjour,
Je pense comme vous mais je ne pense pas qu'il y ait une autre solution.
Ca permet à OsmAnd de proposer des trajets en transport en commun d'un point à un autre.
Car à part g. maps il n'y a rien d'autre ...
- Ile-de-France Mobilité c'est pour l'ile de France
- Oise Mobilité c'est pour l'oise
- Somme Mobilité : pas trouvé
- Aisne Mobilité : Pas trouvé
- Sinon il y a les site des opérateurs ...
Certains lignes inter-département sont déclarées dans deux sites ...
Bref chacun fait sa sauce ...
Bienvenue dans le régionalisation ...
Merci
Cordialement Michel
michel60 (2025-12-07 15:15:52+00:00): Il y a aussi le Gps Magic Earth qui propose des trajets (Voiture ou transport en commun) basé sur openstreetmap ...
Cordialement Michel
Denis_Helfer (2025-12-07 17:57:40+00:00): Il existe ceci : https://www.hautsdefrance-mobilites.fr/rechercher/calculs-itineraires/
michel60 (2025-12-07 18:20:22+00:00): Ok Merci
mavl (2026-05-03 05:38:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 182142872 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20224].