piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Vinber-Pro (2026-06-03 15:01:29+00:00): Merci pour le retour, j'ai mis à jour https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1451587798
ika-chan! (2025-11-27 14:35:34+00:00): This changeset was reverted for adding a filter road that is not marked according to Esri, and a service road that's blocked off by guard rails. Why are you adding things that do not exist?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175200997
ika-chan! (2025-11-27 14:36:56+00:00): What is the source for those proposed roads?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175199069
Frans S (2025-12-13 14:21:00+00:00): Hello. 
If you want  to map paths, please follow the standards. A footway is dedicated for paths in towny areas, only for pedestrians.  Here it is only access to farmland. "Path" or "track" is correct here.
btw. This is a building only project.
Please focus on those objects.
Best regards
Allroads (2025-11-27 15:31:46+00:00): motorway _link is correct,  wat wil je bereiken?
Sumurai8 (2025-11-27 15:37:01+00:00): Probeer eens een route te plannen voor een intersection en na een intersection. OSRM stuurt je over iedere afrit/oprit, omdat de oprit is ingesteld op 130km/h. Uit de link blijkt dat dit expres is, maar het levert stomme resultaten op. Volgens OSRM scheur je met 110km/h door de haaietanden heen om eerder weer op de A6 te komen. Ik hoop met deze wijziging te zorgen dat afrit -> oprit correct wordt gezien als een slechtere keuze dan de snelweg te volgen.
Allroads (2025-11-27 15:55:26+00:00): Bekend probleem, deze situatie reeds besproken, maar dat is een routerengine probleem. Er is ook al een primary_link van gemaakt wat weer terug gezet is naar motorway_link.

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/602755375

OSRM
https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/5773
Allroads (2025-11-27 16:12:48+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/waarschuwing-plaatsen-op-opritten-van-autosnelwegen-vanwege-130-km-h/93165/11
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-27 21:52:57+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13336155378

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
CanopyFalls (2025-11-28 01:10:30+00:00): It looks to be roughly in the same place based on the source you've provided, has it moved over to the next space over?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175199802
loop52 (2025-11-28 09:25:22+00:00): Sorry, I meant the old site is on Scotstown Road B997, but it is now closed. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/57.195574/-2.112089
CanopyFalls (2025-11-28 13:41:14+00:00): Nice, I've copied over all the old tags from the previous recycling center as I assume it's going to recycle roughly the same stuff and deleted the old one.

The reason you couldn't delete it is because it had a wikidata tag, If you need to delete something like that in future delete the wikidata tag first and then you'll be able to delete the way just fine.

Thank you for taking the time to reply on this and keeping the map up to date!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175199802
loop52 (2025-11-28 15:09:29+00:00): Great, thanks!
4004 (2025-11-30 00:36:54+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
вы, если обьект открываете, удаляйте префиксы planned:
4004 (2025-11-30 00:37:55+00:00): brownfield это если там что то было, это снесли, и теперь пусто. но там же изначально просто поле?
aakkkaa (2025-11-30 11:45:05+00:00): Я думал, что снятие плодородного слоя почвы тоже считается за расчистку территории под строительство. Если это не так, то приношу свои извинения, ошибся.
4004 (2025-11-30 22:03:30+00:00): я на истину не претендую, поэтому ошибки нет. по вики, браунфилд это как правило расчищенное после использования под какую то стройку. тут, кажется, больше подходит гринфилд (пустырь который не расчищали, на котором планируют строить). а если слой сняли, то может уже сразу и construction лепить?
flohoff (2025-11-28 12:27:24+00:00): Moin,
du hast hier auf der Hainteichstraße das maxspeed geänder aber das source:maxspeed gelassen.

Das passt so jetzt nicht.

Denn da ist ja nach deinem Changeset kommentar eine Zone30 ausgeweitet - dann ist source:maxspeed nicht mehr DE:urban sondern eher DE:zone30

oder?

Flo
Abno85 (2025-11-28 13:13:30+00:00): Oh, das war mein erster "komplexer" Beitrag zu OSM ohne Survey App, da hatte ich den source-Key übersehen...

Müssen in diesem Fall nun sowohl maxspeed als auch source:maxspeed geändert werden oder reicht die source-Änderung auf DE:zone30 aus?

Danke dir für das Feedback! :)
flohoff (2025-11-29 17:35:32+00:00): Moin,
also - ich gehe mal davon aus das da wirklich 30 ist - In maxspeed gehören immer numerische werte. Also maxspeed=30 ist richtig so wie du es getagged hast.

In source:maxspeed (oder maxspeed:type) taggen wir noch woher eine Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkung kommt.

Also die kann durch eine zone kommen - DE:zone30 oder DE:zone20 - oder durch das Ortsschild - dann ist das 50 + DE:urban oder durch ein strecken ge/verbot - also ein Schild - dann wäre das ein source:maxspeed=sign

Hört sich erstmal komplizierter an als es ist.

Aber maxspeed=30 + source:maxspeed=DE:urban geht erst dann wenn wir in Deutschland die Regelgeschwindigkeit innerorts auf 30 absenken ;)

Flo
Abno85 (2025-12-03 08:45:16+00:00): Moin Flo,
vielen Dank für die ausführliche Erklärung! :)

Ich habe den Schlüssel maxspeed jetzt entsprechend geändert.

Viele Grüße!
Jordi MF (2025-11-27 15:00:06+00:00): Hello SharkGeos,

Are you sure that the name of this old farmhouse is "Mas de Trullens", without the "t"? On the official cartographic map of the Valencian Language Academy, the correct name is Mas de Trullents, with the "t". In Catalan, the letter "t" is not normally pronounced when a word ends in "nts", but it must be written as the spelling rules say. Maybe that's why you heard "Trullens" and not "Trullents".

We can include loc_name=Mas de Trullens + name=Mas de Trullents.

Regards
SharkGeos (2025-11-27 19:46:22+00:00): Hello
The name was updated as is shown by the sign on the wall by the gate of the house “Casa de Trullens”. I aw the difference when I walked past last week.  If this is incorrect then this change can be regressed. You can also see the name in Google Streetview but I made the change based on a local survey.
eggie (2025-11-27 14:38:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-11-27 14:41:29+00:00): Hoi,

Probeer op de bestaande adresnode te taggen.
Dubbel huisnummers bestaan eigenlijk niet in de Kadaster.
Dat 'bedenken' bedrijven zelf.

MVG
eggie
Đuro Jiří (2025-11-27 16:34:40+00:00): Alors, désolé si je me suis mal expliqué précédemment.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175205717
eggie (2025-11-27 14:47:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Mocht je bijdrage 
Feedback  Dit soort tests geeft schade aan de kaart. OSM is geen omgeving om iets uit te testen. 
Mocht je bijdrage serieus bedoeld zijn dan is het advies om je eerst goed in te lezen.
Niet name=  gebruiken om iets te beschrijven. 
Straatnaam doodlopende weg, name=parkeerplaats
landuse=residential? 
Daar zijn speciale tags voor die je in de wiki kunt vinden. 


MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-11-27 14:49:17+00:00): reverted by changeset #175201313
Frans S (2025-12-30 16:15:31+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A few remarks.
 * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such as roads and paths.
 * Buildings should have their corners squared.

Check the task instructions for the full requirements.
Keep that in mind at future mappings.
Keep on mapping!
Frans S (2025-12-13 12:02:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please map more accurately and follow the rooflines. Your mappings are often oversized as well.
Quality prevails above quantity.
Best regards, and keep mapping.
CanopyFalls (2025-11-28 01:03:34+00:00): Thank you for contributing to the map!

Just a few minor notes but I wanna be clear, the changeset is all good. When mapping a building you should try and position the outline where the foot of the building is, not where the roof is on the satellite imagery.
Secondly you can square corners of your areas using the "q" hotkey on iD which helps when mapping buildings.

Best of luck with mapping and feel free to reach out with any questions.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175201267
Supaplex (2025-11-30 15:07:41+00:00): 重覆添加了，已經有了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1263141596
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175201502
eggie (2025-11-27 15:07:14+00:00): highway=pedestrian is een voetgangers gebied.
Welke bebording staat hier.
Bv Iets als G7 met een onderbord of een opschrift. Fietsen toegestaan.
Voor de routering helpt het niet. Je zult emergency=yes moeten toevoegen. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-11-27 15:13:12+00:00): Zo te zien is het geen highway=pedestrian, een highway=service met access=private (art 461 wvs) 
Dan wel toevoegen emergency=yes 

Dat het nog als pedestrian staat komt door de import uit de data in 2007 van AND. Daar waren toegangswegen als pedestrian getagd. 
Die lange descriptions gewoon verwijderen. 
MVG
eggie
VRNHN Johnie Garstenveld (2025-11-27 15:13:20+00:00): Voor zover ik kon vinden voor de aanpassing alleen een bord met max. 5 km/h met daaronder aangegeven stapvoets te rijden. Ik zal jouw toevoeging even aanpassen, waarvoor dank! 
Ik gelood dat ik de emergency=yes nog wel vaker zal vergeten.

Fijne avond, 
John
eggie (2025-11-27 15:15:56+00:00): Ik heb net wat aangepast, maar wellicht waren we allebei  bezig.
De description kun je zelf verwijderen.
groet
VRNHN Johnie Garstenveld (2025-11-27 15:24:02+00:00): Ik zie je aanpassing inderdaad. Dit was ook mijn aanvankelijke plan, maar had de hoop door de voetgangersweg door te trekken dit voldoende zou zijn. Dank wederom!
eggie (2025-11-27 15:27:18+00:00): highway=pedestrian vind je wel in bv winkelgebieden in steden. Dan is het ook zaak om emergency=yes toe te voegen naast bv bicycle=yes of delivery=yes met evt bep tijden. Dan met conditional 
Die accesstags zijn echt ingewikkeld. Vraag in zo'n geval om hulp op het forum.
VRNHN Johnie Garstenveld (2025-11-27 15:31:36+00:00): Jam daar zeg je me wat. Ik vind het leuk om deze dingen uit te vogelen, maar ingewikkeld is het wel. Vooral omdat ik het (nog) alleen vanuit mijn ambu perspectief bekijk. Maar ben nog maar net begonnen
CAM-Gerlach (2025-11-27 20:05:31+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. We're glad you're here (or perhaps returning, judging from your name?).

Thanks for adding the details on this cafe! As a quick tip, its really helpful to fill out the `source` field on your changset, so other mappers know how you collected the data (in-person survey? Website? Something else?). Also, any chance you can check and add the unit number (`addr:unit`), and merge this node with the existing address node with that unit number, to avoid duplication? Finally, per national convention its a good idea to include at least the addr:state (VA) and addr:city (Blacksburg), and perhaps addr:country (US) per local convention.

Thanks, and looking forward to your future contributions!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175202002
keyyushi (2025-11-27 18:39:50+00:00): Yol ismi yakın bir zamanda (18.11.2025) değiştiği için old_name anahtarı ile 1431. Cadde ismini saklamak daha doğru diye düşünüyorum.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:old_name
bba367ghd (2025-11-27 15:32:25+00:00): dodany został Market Biedronka, parking obok skelpu Delikatesy Centrum, oraz droga Wewnętrza w miejscowości królewiec
Bartek444 (2025-11-29 11:44:35+00:00): Jak przebiega ogrodzenie? obecnie jest wrysowane przez budynek PSB razem z obszarem przemysłowym i handlu
eggie (2025-11-27 15:43:27+00:00): Tip..  Probeer niet te schuiven in editmodus. Dat geeft vaak schade omdat je onbedoeld ergens iets doet.
Verschuivingen of per abuis een toets aanraakt. Bij de Kindcentrum Rivierenwijk heb je een cirkel gemaakt. Klopt dat wel?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175202283

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-11-27 15:45:25+00:00): Landuse education hersteld.
Jaymap5432 (2025-11-27 18:08:27+00:00): Hoi Eggie, ik had geen idee. Bedankt voor de tip over slepen, daar zal ik op letten. Ik zag in mijn wijzigingen alleen wat bijgewerkte properties.
Kees 59 (2025-11-29 11:45:41+00:00): Betreft node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2680434591. Je hebt daar een telefoonnummer toegevoegd. Telefoonnummers in OSM moeten in een bepaald format (Zie: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone). Ik heb deze al aangepast.
Yunan973 (2026-01-10 16:16:25+00:00): Bonjour,
pratiquement tous tes numéros siret rajoutés sont mal formatés : j'ai corrigé le 1er (argos véto), peux-tu corriger les autres ?

Cordialement
michel60 (2025-11-30 08:03:02+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez créé il y a 3 jour la plateforme du bus suivante :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454184418
Je ne sais pas s'il y a un rapport mais GEOFABRIK OSM Inspector donne l'erreur suivante : Street vehicle route over railways
N'ayant assez de connaissance, je ne sais ce qui entraine cette erreur.
Ci dessous le lien montrant la plateforme en erreur :
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=2.38048&lat=48.85853&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.93&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
La ligne de bus est tracée en noir ce qui signifie qu'elle est en erreur. En cliquant dessus on obtient le détail de l'erreur ...
En espérant que vous aurez plus d'idée que moi sur le problème
Cordialement Michel
yxoc (2026-01-12 20:40:38+00:00): Bonsoir,

c'est bien de cartographier les nouvelles îles pour les arrêts de bus, mais merci de ne pas les mettre dans les relations bus, sinon ca nous fait le bazar dans les relations bus (ce qui peut etre membre d'une relation route est reglémenté dans le schéma public_transport) et de ne pas mettre des tags "bus=yes" et "network=*". C'est simplement des "highway=footway" et "area=yes".

Merci -yxoc
eggie (2025-11-27 15:32:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Beter niet een bestaande adresnode aanpassen, maar op de juiste adresnode de info toevoegen en op de verkeerde verwijderen.
Je hebt hier ook wat onbedoeld aan het wegennet veranderd. Ikpas even wat aan.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-11-27 15:36:14+00:00): De info heb ik samengevoegd met xde adresnode..Wegennet hersteld
eggie (2025-11-27 15:39:57+00:00): fixed weekdagen  en format phone.
Je eigen edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175202556
ilias_ (2025-11-27 15:23:55+00:00): آآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآآ



الله يبارك فعمر ســــــــــيدي
johaeha (2025-11-27 15:31:03+00:00): Also shifted the corner of Väike-Tähe a bit so the path meets it nicely.
Frans S (2026-01-19 10:49:18+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped.  However, a few points need improvements.
C: Collected adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.
G: Included the shadow of the building.



Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175203192
maraf24 (2025-11-27 16:10:40+00:00): No raczej nie pod takim kątem powinien byc ten cmentarz narysowany, na ISOK dobrze widac.
WieKo68 (2025-11-27 17:09:25+00:00): Rzeczywiście, trochę przesadziłem z wielkością i kształtem. Teraz już jest poprawny kształt
WieKo68 (2025-11-27 17:09:45+00:00): wg. Geoportalu NID
CanopyFalls (2025-11-28 00:53:47+00:00): Looks good! Thank you for making the map better! :D
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175203516
Kovoschiz (2025-11-27 23:10:43+00:00): `access=emergency` is not used, and `emegency=` doesn't show whether it's originally EVA-only. Emegency units using it should be treated as short-term closures functionally, not the same physical permanent damages.
CanopyFalls (2025-11-27 19:43:52+00:00): Noticed your account has just started editing the map. Thank you for making the map better and welcome to OSM!

If you end up adding more addresses and alike, for what I assume is your local area, I recommend using Street Complete (https://streetcomplete.app/) for surveying if you have an android phone as it's much faster than the iD editor for surveying purposes.
Aquachippy (2025-11-29 13:58:59+00:00): Thank you for the heads up, I've now dowloaded Street Complete to try out.
Joske1020 (2025-11-28 18:07:40+00:00): merci!
bxl-forever (2025-11-28 18:47:41+00:00): You are welcome.

Just one thing: in the future, please avoid commenting on changesets directly, when there is nothing *wrong* about them.

This is because OSM has statistics of mappers who got changeset comments, and comments are implicitely assimilated to… criticism.  (People with a lot of commented changesets are viewed as bad mappers.)
DiogoBaptista98 (2025-12-05 12:22:55+00:00): Hello, I noticed that you removed area=yes from a highway=pedestrian element. Could you clarify why this change was made? This removal is incorrect, as the area=yes tag is valid, standardized, and explicitly documented in the official OSM wiki here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=pedestrian area=yes is important for properly indicating that the pedestrian highway represents an area rather than just a linear feature. Please consider reverting the change to restore the correct tagging. Thank you!
seichter (2025-12-05 13:33:10+00:00): To my opinion there should be a clear distinction between linear objects like highway=* and area objects e.g. landuse=*.
pedestrian areas are of the second kind and there is a method of doing this: highway:area=pedestrian
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway
I consider the subtag area=yes as just an auxiliary mean to indicate areas where there is no other possibility.
The main difference of both methods is during routing: area:highway is not used for routing - you need linear ways across the area. There is a tag virtual=yes to indicate that this is not a clearly visible way. But nevertheless it gives a much more realistic way of actual movement.

The tagging with area=yes is valid, but it is not the only possibility to tag areas.
But if there is common consent in the portuguese community to tag pedestrian areas only this way, I will not touch them any more.
dmfr (2026-04-06 12:21:21+00:00): Hello! I was asked to provide my opinion, as an expert in micromapping.

First of all, thank you for your opinion. There is no such thing as a consensus in the Portuguese community on how to map pedestrian areas/sidewalks, because there is no need for such a consensus. The documented use and the wiki are clear regarding how to tag walkable areas:
- Narrow sidewalks where pedestrian flow is mostly in a single direction: area:highway=footway.
- Wide sidewalks where pedestrian flow can be made in many directions: highway=footway + area=yes.
- Pedestrian streets or walkable squares: highway=pedestrian + area=yes.

So your recent changes to walkable squares in Portugal are highly irregular, and should be fixed/reverted.

Adding to that, the tags virtual=yes and virtual:highway=* are not documented. On the other hand, the use of highway=footway inside routable areas such as highway=pedestrian + area=yes is very common and well-documented.

It is therefore imperative that these changes are fixed.
seichter (2026-04-06 19:56:56+00:00): I've been mapping since 2008 and as far as I know there is no expert/arbitration instance in OSM.
The Wiki is not a set of rules to obey but at most a collection of best practice recommendations continuously subject to change.
But nevertheless I do not intend to interfere with local practice and I have reverted all area:highway=pedestrian edits by me that I have found.
Note: I did not and will not change area:highway=pedestrian tags from other mappers.
dmfr (2026-04-06 20:47:24+00:00): Thank you for your work, and your understanding.

Please do not take the following thoughts personally. I'm told I have a tendency to write in a way that seems passive-aggressive, which is not at all my intention.

Quality of OSM data is kept by mappers, and when there is a dispute the matter may be taken to the DWG, which may issue a ban for vandalism, so there are conflict resolution processes. Tho it is often faster and easier for everyone if we can reach an agreement, as was the case here, without unnecessary escalation.

I did not intend to convey that my opinion is more important than anyone else's, merely that I was asked to contribute to this discussion with my opinion, that I have mapped plenty of this kind of feature, and that I have seen different types of mappings, so I am not talking about a topic I an unfamiliar with.

These are high-visibility areas in the map, that are seen every day by dozens of mappers, and the majority are actively maintained. Although it may happen that such an important feature may stay poorly mapped for quite some time, that is very rare, and most often there have been multiple people involved in discussions on how to map such high-visibility features. Unilaterally changing such high-visibility features, without even consulting with the people that previously touched those features, directly contradicting the use of highway=pedestrian+area=yes in area-routable squares, is not typical of experienced mappers.

These are the pages I reference the most when mapping this sort of features:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:area:highway%3Dfootway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway#Areas
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian#Squares_and_plazas
I encourage people mapping those features to refer to those pages. As you mention, the wiki is not a source of truth, but it is a somewhat consistent mix of the opinion of many mappers. Which is a lot better than the opinion of one mapper.

Yet again, thank you for modifying these features.
CanopyFalls (2025-11-28 00:45:53+00:00): Hello and thank you for contributing to the map!

I've marked the changeset as bad as I don't think you've mapped the Perrotin London correctly but the information added is still very useful to the map.

Would you be able to clarify where the Perrotin London Gallery is? I'm guessing it's underground, underneath the sidewalk, with access from the street/hotel? It might be worth mapping as a single node rather than as a geometry as it can get pretty complex to map in situations like that. Equally feel free to reply on here if you'd like help improving how this is currently mapped.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175205782