piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-03-17 11:15:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/9760843412 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Inplace Studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-17 17:33:17+00:00): 🕵 The mentioned node appears to be part of a highway=*

Businesses are usually mapped as standalone nodes (or within building polygons), rather than as part of a road geometry.
Wildsharky (2026-03-25 10:35:12+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180101288
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 14:41:50+00:00): Removed blatant SEO spam advertising tags from a highway node in changeset 184435530

https://osm.org/changeset/184435530
NeisBot (2026-03-17 11:18:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/2156916947 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Kitchen studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-17 17:33:18+00:00): 🕵 The mentioned node appears to be part of a highway=*

Businesses are usually mapped as standalone nodes (or within building polygons), rather than as part of a road geometry.
ajmat (2026-03-18 09:21:56+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 180047698
Colbertson (2026-03-17 11:17:22+00:00): oops, was using upload selection and didnt quite select all of the previous changeset
IvaKraljić (2026-03-17 13:03:03+00:00): The wrong tag has since been corrected in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180006724. #OptimoRoute
GeoMH (2026-03-18 19:12:50+00:00): Wow, der Festplatz sieht jetzt echt klasse aus! Danke für die viele Arbeit, die Du Dir damit gemacht hast.
NeisBot (2026-03-17 11:24:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/9954462892 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dom Pogrzebowy"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Dom Pogrzebowy"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-25 11:33:13+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/180020568
NeisBot (2026-03-17 11:24:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/4868565517 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Boutique de mariée"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-25 11:33:16+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180402922
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
gscholz (2026-03-19 06:34:58+00:00): Hi AlhassaneDiallo,
your recent edits have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-9.36482&lat=10.71872&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
ralley (2026-03-17 23:45:22+00:00): Changing the name is not the correct way to handle stages of decay please look in to life cycle prefixes on the OSM wiki
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180001400
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-03 14:55:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 185044755, 185044712, 185044792, 185043031, 185044858, 185044854, 185044726, 185044802, 185044684, 185044693, 185043064, 185044766, 185044834, 185044779, 185043050, 185044776, 185043074, 185043054, 185044732, 185043091, 185044704, 185044746, 185044715, 185043085, 185044894, 185044810, 185044795, 185044765, 185044862, 185043059, 185044750, 185044758, 185043076, 185044812, 185044785, 185043015, 185043039, 185044823, 185044748, 185044738, 185044744, 185044734, 185044845, 185044702, 185044835, 185044888, 185044873, 185044731, 185044879, 185044817, 185044827, 185044789, 185044865, 185044720, 185044843, 185043045, 185044839, 185044849, 185044771, 185044694, 185044768, 185044707, 185043066 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy imports in Ivory Coast
eggie (2026-03-17 12:28:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Juke9573 (2026-03-17 12:35:24+00:00): Dankjewel!
Ik "lurk" al bijna 15 jaar Openstreetmap, en heb eindelijk de sprong gewaagd. Ik doe mijn best het mijn reviewers niet te moeilijk te maken 😃
Groet! Juke
eggie (2026-03-17 12:38:07+00:00): Nou.. Veel plezier met mappen. Houd je niet in 😀
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
trial (2026-03-17 15:57:41+00:00): Bonjour "Panneau d'affichage libre" n'est pas un nom mais une description.
`advertising=board`
`message=opinion`
semble le traduire :
wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:advertising
Thatoo (2026-03-17 16:28:36+00:00): J'ai ajouté depuis Osmand mais je ne suis pas sûr de comment bien faire.
Thatoo (2026-03-17 16:29:43+00:00): Je voulais ajouter quelque chose de similaire à https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3344924438#map=19/47.766562/-3.345235
trial (2026-03-17 18:10:57+00:00): oui "name=Affichage Libre" et "name:br=Aotreet Skritelliñ" sont aussi à supprimer ^^
Depuis OsmAnd, c'est un peu pénible car si le type d'objet n'est pas prévu, il faut passer par la partie étendue où tu dois tout connaître par cœur.
Mais déjà tu peux éviter de mettre name.
trial (2026-03-17 18:19:01+00:00): en fait on peut renommer ces tags en description et description:br.
Thatoo (2026-03-18 10:24:38+00:00): J'ai essayé de l'ajouter via Comaps cette fois, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13658395101 et ça semble mieux correspondre à ce qui a été fait pour les précédents panneaux comme celui-là https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3344924433 . Si cette façon de faire est ok, on peut supprimer celui-là et ne garder que le nouveau. J'ai repéré 15 panneaux comme ça à ajouter donc j'aimerais valider la bonne façon de faire avec celui-là avant.
trial (2026-03-18 10:39:40+00:00): name=Affichage Libre reste incorrect
description=Affichage Libre pourquoi pas.
Il manque board_type=notice (mais c'est plus pour des petites annonces).
Oui il vaut mieux les faire tous pareil, pas de problème pour corriger les anciens non plus.

`advertising=board`
`message=opinion` me semble plus proche d'un panneau d'affichage libre, à toi de voir.
Thatoo (2026-03-18 11:31:24+00:00): Que faut-il mettre dans name du coup? Le reste, je n'ai pas vraiment la main, je ne sais pas comment effectuer des modifications, ni dans Comaps, ni dans Osmand ni sur openstreetmap.
trial (2026-03-18 11:54:21+00:00): Rien tout simplement : un panneau d'affichage libre n'a pas de nom propre.
Oui, iD ou JOSM permettent de contribuer plus facilement (sur PC). Ou SCEE et Vespucci sur téléphone (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/SCEE, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Vespucci)
IvaKraljić (2026-03-18 15:30:55+00:00): The unnecessary split has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180065664#map=17/42.520872/-70.922611. #OptimoRoute
IvaKraljić (2026-03-17 12:48:19+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180006048. #OptimoRoute
dcapillae (2026-03-17 12:52:18+00:00): Hola.

Gracias por los cambios.

Algunas pequeñas correcciones:

- Usamos guiones para las fechas, p. ej.: 2026-03-17
- Para introducir el código wikidata de la marca, usamos «brand:wikidata»: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:brand:wikidata
- Si «Grupo Safamotor» es el operador pero no se incluye en el nombre del establecimiento (en el cartel sobre la fachada, por ejemplo) no se pone en la etiqueta  «name». Reservamos ese dato para la clave «operator».

Gracias de nuevo por los cambios.

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
IvaKraljić (2026-03-17 12:50:08+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180006133. #OptimoRoute
gscholz (2026-03-19 06:35:04+00:00): Hi AlhassaneDiallo,
your recent edits have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-9.36482&lat=10.71872&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
NeisBot (2026-03-17 12:36:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13654833863 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Accountant office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-25 17:33:07+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180419518
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Frans S (2026-03-30 10:51:53+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
When mapping buildings for HOTOSM the default tag is building=yes
We cannot decide what the purpose is of the objects seen in the imagery. Local mappers will adjust them.
Best regard and akeep mapping
eggie (2026-03-17 13:07:14+00:00): Dag Cartaligula,

Dit lijkt me niet correct. Een landuse=farmyard geeft een erf van een boerenbedrijf aan en niet al het akkerland.
We krijgen anders op alle landuse heel groot de bedrijfsnamen. Dat kan niet de bedoeling zijn.
De landuse=farmyard kan dan op het erf getagd worden. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-17 13:21:33+00:00): De info heb ik verplaatst naar het erf.
5m4u9 (2026-03-18 04:42:27+00:00): gracias por aclarar, la ultima vez que pasé por ahi solo vi el nombre zamudio. 

qué lio tener 2 o como encontré hasta 5 "escuelas" en una misma infraestructura. no encuentro la lógica porque separar, sino solo burocracia, en fin.
JakovRajić (2026-03-27 10:54:52+00:00): It was concluded that the no truck sign was meant for the street to the left, therefore the tag was fixed to hgv=designated in changeset/180496160
bxl-forever (2026-03-17 15:18:45+00:00): Hallo and welkom.

Bedankt voor je bijdrage en voor de duidelijke beschrijving.  Maak er de volgende keer aub twee aparte uploads van: één voor de huizen in één gebied en een aparte upload voor de wegen aan de andere kant.

Gebruik aub enkel de GRB-kaart (en niet de luchtfotos) om huizen te tekenen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Buildings
felipeeugenio (2026-03-17 14:25:19+00:00): Hola. Transformó un jardín infantil en un árbol. Asumo que se trató de un error. Fue Corregido. gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180005936
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-04 19:26:33+00:00): Hello!

You used
restriction=No U turn
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8971312283/history

Have you maybe meant
restriction=no_u_turn
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-04 19:27:12+00:00): also, what this was supposed to express on this node?
no details provided here (2026-03-18 18:58:23+00:00): Thanks for plotting these.  Do consider using the Cadastral data layer to ensure they are properly aligned with existing data in the map (you can move alignment layers to match).
JakovRajić (2026-03-17 15:06:45+00:00): Used wrong unit, fixed in changeset/180012644
mike140 (2026-06-26 22:51:44+00:00): Дороги типу "С" в Україні позначаються unclassified
IvaKraljić (2026-03-17 13:01:19+00:00): This changeset is the correction of the wrong tag from the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180000206. #OptimoRoute
atchisson (2026-05-16 21:09:59+00:00): Hello,

Pour la https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1487217972, je pense que c'est plus un bateau qu'un passage piéton, le trottoir reste continu non ?

J'ai cherché un peu sur le wiki, mais je n'ai rien trouvé de spécifique pour les bateaux, il me semblait pourtant qu'il existait quelque chose :/
Vétérini (2026-05-16 21:49:02+00:00): Salut,

En effet, mais c'est déjà indiqué par le crossing:continuous=yes. Il manque le kerb=no, je vais le rajouter même si c'est plutôt StreetComplete qui ne devrait pas le demander quand on a crossing:continuous=yes.

L'intérêt d'indiquer cela ici, c'est notamment pour des usagers malvoyants, afin de les avertir qu'il y a un risque d'interaction avec des véhicules assez important (car une sortie de parking de plusieurs commerces)

Je vais répondre sur la note

Pour info, j'en avais discuté ici, mais il n'y a pas forcément de consensus ultra clair là-dessus :
https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/traversee-pietonne-informelle/41689/16
NeisBot (2026-03-17 13:06:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13654879691 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "concesionario de coches"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "concesionario de coches"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
dcapillae (2026-03-17 13:50:31+00:00): Hola.

Convendría revisar las descripciones añadidas en la clave «description», eliminarlas o hacerlas más neutrales.

Los concesionarios de coches tienen un esquema de etiquetado muy detallado en OSM, por lo que la mayor parte de las veces no hace falta usar «description». 

No obstante, si se desea utilizar, se debería usar únicamente para describir el objeto de forma objetiva, sin comentarios que puedan entenderse promocionales o cuyo significado ya esté implícito en la definición de otras etiquetas.

Puede consultar la documentación del wiki para más detalles: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description#No_advertising

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
aTarom (2026-03-18 14:16:43+00:00): @Grupo Safamotor, puedes contestar alguno de los changesets?
Es importante que leas lo que te indican sobre publicidad en descripciones.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
AwFi (2026-07-11 10:09:51+00:00): Ciao,
ho visto ora questo changeset. Non è forse meglio aspettare che le ipotesi vengano scremate fino ad una singola definitiva prima di mapparle?
FroschForscher (2026-03-17 20:05:03+00:00): Hallo cosphi,
Informationen zum Kartieren von Bürgersteigen findest du hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Gehsteig
TL;DR:
- Wenn Luftbilder in sehr guter Qualität vorhanden sind (Baden-Württemberg DOP20) und der Bürgersteig nicht direkt an die Fahrbahn anschließt sondert durch einen Grünstreifen/Parkbuchten/... abtrennt ist kann man einen Bürgersteig durchaus als eigenständigen Weg erfassen.
- Dann muss er aber auch mit anderen Straßenteilen verbunden werden. In diesem Falle also mit dem Geh-/Radweg im Westen und dem Brachvogelweg im Osten, ansonsten ist ein Routing nicht möglich.
- Darüber hinaus kann man an dem weg selbst noch angeben das es sich um eine Bürgersteig handelt (footway=sidewalk) und an der Straße sidewalk:(left|right)=separate setzen.

FroschForscher

PS: Beachte das review_requested bei niemandem eine Benachrichtigung erzeugt und die meisten review_requested nie überprüft werden.
cosphi (2026-03-18 05:55:58+00:00): Danke für deine Nachricht.
Ich wohne in der Nähe diese Wohngebietes und könnte auch beim durchlaufen einen GPS-Tack aufnehmen - aber ich glaube dass das nicht besser wird als die DOP20 Karte.
trial (2026-03-17 16:02:58+00:00): Bonjour, bienvenu dans OpenStreetMap.
Ici visiblement une erreur : vous (ou tu, comme tu veux) avez remplacé une zone résidentielle par une grande aire de jeux !
mueschel (2026-03-20 19:00:41+00:00): Please check the tags you added here - several of them should not appear in OSM, e.g. 

enumerator
latitude
longitude
community

Please use only those tags that are available in your editor as presets!
trial (2026-03-17 16:07:02+00:00): Rebonjour, air ici s'écrit aire (une aire). Mais surtout c'est un nom description, à ne pas mettre dans name, dans name on ne met que des noms propres.
addr:city
addr:postcode
addr:street n'apportent pas grand chose :
la ville et le code postal se déduisent de la géométrie (donc plutôt à éviter : au mieux ça n'apportera rien), et addr:street de la proximité
trial (2026-03-17 16:09:53+00:00): Bonjour, bienvenu·e dans OpenStreetMap, reste encore basin=infiltration en trop.
trial (2026-03-17 16:15:59+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenu·e dans OpenStreetMap.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489774878#map=19/47.798475/-3.318806 (par exemple) est une voie privée (on le voit sur la couche cadastre : fait partie de la parcelle de la maison).
highway=service
service=driveway
access=private
noname=yes
serait une meilleure description.
lyctkel (2026-03-18 16:45:54+00:00): Moin LümmelMonster,
wie ich sehe verwendest Du recycling:glass_bottles:colour. Danke!

Es ist nicht wirklich gut dokumentiert, aber des alphabetische Sortieren der Farben macht es mir einfacher hier (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/recycling%3Aglass_bottles%3Acolour#values) die Übersicht zu behalten. Ich habe mir mal erlaubt die Farben zu sortieren.
Viele Grüße,
lyctkel
felipeeugenio (2026-03-17 14:20:13+00:00): Hola. Las entradas del metro son subway_entrance. No son estaciones en si mismo con todas las propiedades de las estaciones. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dsubway_entrance).

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180008489
felipeeugenio (2026-03-17 14:22:02+00:00): Además ya estaban dibujadas.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180008489
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:05:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
NeisBot (2026-03-17 13:48:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13655031688 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Barbershop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-25 17:33:09+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180419522
(Delete spam tags. First version)
raphaelmirc (2026-04-25 01:08:28+00:00): Boa Noite Samuell, tudo bem? 
esse limite do bairro está quebrado, se você olhar no ID você vai ver que a linha do limite está quebrado.. 

você tem os dados do limite para correção? 

atenciosamente, 

Raphael de Assis
JakovRajić (2026-03-17 15:16:25+00:00): Used wrong unit fixed in changeset/180012901
trial (2026-03-17 15:51:12+00:00): Bonjour, bienvenu dans OpenStreetMap, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5962889967 : crossing:markings=zebra serait plus précis.
Sur PCRS raster (fond d'écran plus précis mais un peu plus vieux) on voit aussi qu'il y a des dalles podotactiles.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
007Transformer (2026-03-18 05:42:23+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset 180039263
JakovRajić (2026-03-17 15:15:04+00:00): Used wrong unit fixed in changeset/180013059
AwFi (2026-04-01 13:18:49+00:00): Ciao,
è stato discusso con la community di uniformare RFI agli standard di OSM con il nome completo, qui trovi la discussione: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rete-ferroviaria-italiana-differenze-di-nome-osm-wikidata-e-nome-ufficiale/140123a .
La modifica dell'NSI è stata già fatta ma gli editor devono ancora aggiornarsi.
Martinligabue (2026-04-01 20:12:54+00:00): ah scusa, ho invertito mentalmente, annullo?
AwFi (2026-04-01 20:17:09+00:00): No problem, ho già fatto io, era solo per non continuare a fare avanti e indietro tra RFI e Rete Ferroviaria Italiana.
Grazie!
trigpoint (2026-03-17 14:45:07+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/180011487