piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Filip009 (2024-07-04 19:14:14+00:00): Ste si istý, že je tu brod https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12023783895? Vyzerá to skorej ako by tam bol most.
Tomas Straupis (2024-07-01 09:06:54+00:00): Kūdros žymimos landuse=basin. Atstačiau sugadintą žymėjimą.
willkmis (2024-07-01 01:32:29+00:00): Hi, thanks for doing what appears to be a lot of hard work adding all these service roads around the country. In the future, do you think you could try to keep your changesets at bit more local, or maybe state-by-state or region-by-region at least? Having these US-spanning changesets makes it hard for others to tell what's actually been changed where.

Thanks!
Will
felipeeugenio (2024-07-01 15:16:29+00:00): Hola. En addr:housenumber va el numero de la casa.
Solo agregar P. no "casa P"
En todo caso además existe un addr:unit en caso de que la casa ya tenga un número y le quieras asignar una letra.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153389082
danieldegroot2 (2026-04-17 19:04:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2765191310
Shop should no longer exist, even at time of this changeset; according to various articles the brand was bankrupt, the shops were closed(except Veenendaal which might have still had some leftovers), though it was acquired and continued as webshop with promise of additional items -not sure it website was ever available, it now redirects to possibly malicious website instead of clothing items-, but perhaps some signage remained, or they independently decided to sell leftovers or continue somehow (similar to Blokker shops).

Regards,

Daniel
Friendly_Ghost (2026-04-19 21:57:08+00:00): Thanks for the info. I've removed the POI tags from the node.
Filip009 (2024-07-04 19:19:44+00:00): Fakt je tento objekt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1297794420/history/1 toto https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:playground=playhouse ?
tyfi (2024-06-30 23:51:44+00:00): Also bumped from track to unclassified, as it is most assuredly not a track road.
tyfi (2024-06-30 23:53:25+00:00): It's a rural road that straddles ag land, but it it's not meant solely for land access. It's a public road maintained by the county, designated a number in the county route network, and connects two state routes.
treestryder (2024-07-04 03:24:17+00:00): You mean, you didn't survey it to see if these trails actually exist and collect GPS traces?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153389221
Trail_Caretaker (2024-07-04 13:01:29+00:00): Hi, many trails were missing and many were not labeled.  The govt trail map has trail names on it, which I used to label the paths.  Is there something that is incorrect?  If so, I would gladly fix it.  Thank you.
treestryder (2024-07-06 16:12:03+00:00): You mean besides the general cautions against importing/copying other people's work because it may be inaccurate / out of date, have an incompatible license, or clash with what is already mapped ... 

This case it might be fine. It's just that I only map what I surveyed or verified. Lincoln Brick Park has been on my to-do list for a very long time. Before I could map it I had to walk its trails again to capture and upload GPS traces to OpenStreetMap. Maybe even capture Mapillary imagery. 

When I map, I am always thinking of things like the families who will use my edits to walk a new trail or the person trying to route their wheelchair across town, or the self-driving car depending on the accuracy of my edits. In all these cases it is better that the data is accurate than every area is filled in with something.
Udarian (2024-07-02 21:45:46+00:00): Next time can you please leave a change set comment that better describes what you did in the commit. For more information see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
TeroToc (2024-07-02 23:16:42+00:00): No.
tyfi (2024-07-01 00:14:26+00:00): This also added some service roads around what looks like a water treatment center.
DorneyLake123 (2024-07-01 00:26:51+00:00): changeset was in Waddesdon only. huge bbox because I added a fixme to relation "akeman street" stating it should go in open historical map.
tyfi (2024-07-01 00:52:19+00:00): Some ways were named "Allen Landings Road" (S traded places) since tiger import
tyfi (2024-07-01 00:55:06+00:00): Also added a piece of Dry Run Branch based on USGS hydro data
Pan (2024-07-01 00:51:57+00:00): added missing addresses
KiloThree (2024-07-03 02:28:44+00:00): Node 1399798442 does not appear to be on Allston St, why was that address moved from node 9130079442?

Thank you for reverting the harborwalk cycleway designations

You have added a cycleway in Post Office Square. This does not exist, which is why I had marked it as cycleway:right=lane on Congress Street

Please also note that the use of separate cycleways when mapping cycle tracks can substantially impair routing, and the mapping of non-vertically separated one directional cycle lanes as separate ways conflicts with the pattern as described by the wiki as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153390088
mat (2024-07-02 05:21:26+00:00): Bonjour,

Les trottoirs sont indiqués avec un tag séparé, c'est, par exemple :

highway=secondary
sidewalk:right=yes
Fizzie-DWG (2024-08-11 06:01:55+00:00): Why did you change the name to "Aldi Road"?
tyfi (2024-07-01 01:09:38+00:00): Also added some adjacent features like a tributary and surface tags on nearby roads
Warin61 (2024-07-02 00:31:27+00:00): Hi,
Multipolygons outer ways cannot share segments .. so the relation is faulty. 
The DCS Base Map is another source for the legal boundaries of things. For instance the road side footpath is not part of the park but part of the road infrastructure .. comes out of a different accounting pocket. 

I have made some 'corrections'. See what you think.
steve91 (2025-01-06 08:11:42+00:00): Hi Shashp,
Over New Years I came across the change in road classification for the Barry Way and Snowy River Road. (I regularly visit the area this time of year).

I was surprised to see my GPS display this as a 'track', when it is a 'secondary' road in accordance with the tagging guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Roads

Your changeset notes that this road is unsuitable for 2wds.  This is not the case, with the road being accessible for 2wds, as long as they drive to the conditions.  Acknowledging that people who have only driven in city conditions will find this road a bit more confronting, but still meets the definitions.  While in the area I saw quite a few 2wd vehicles on the road, with no modifications for high clearance and no issues in navigating the road.

The changes include paved sections of the road now being tagged as 'track'.

If their is a routing issue, than the routing engine requires updates, or the users need to ensure they select paved roads only.

I propose to revert the changes back to the road's status of the 'secondary' as per the tagging guidelines.
TheSwavu (2025-01-06 08:40:22+00:00): This isn't really a secondary road. It doesn't link any population centres to the primary network. One of its features is that there's nothing on it.

I don't think it would even rate tertiary. 

But this isn't the place to discuss this. I'd suggest on the forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/oceania/73
shashp (2025-01-06 10:41:29+00:00): There's no need for any discussion. It's clearly documented by dozens of drivers as impassable without 4x4, some of their vehicles have incurred thousands in damage attempting to use it. AWD have been stuck needing roadside assist. People try calling 000 for help but have no service. "Paved sections" don't make it secondary. It isn't a routing issue, it isn't tagged properly, just because some people like driving it sometimes and are offended it's called a track or goat path.

https://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g255098-d602483-r873715658-The_Barry_Way-Victoria.html
shashp (2025-01-06 11:09:46+00:00): To be crystal clear, from the guidelines you linked:

"The standard practice in Australia is generally consistent with the global definition, and the examples below can help contextualise the application of this hierarchy for local mappers.

There is no direct correlation between the road classification and route numbers. The classifications provided below are a guide, but mappers should classify highways based on the actual nature of the road, rather than any formal route designation."
steve91 (2025-01-07 10:21:10+00:00): Responded via the community forum, where Shashp has raised this concern: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/question-regarding-road-classifications-for-monaro-kings-and-snowy-mountains-highways/122624/5
UKChris (2024-10-28 22:29:44+00:00): Hi John, just an FYI, properties 50 to 58 of Mattravers Way have the post code TA1 3GN (not TA1 3FR), as do 73 onwards.
John Grubb (2024-10-28 23:21:39+00:00): Cheers ears. I'll take a look-see in the morning.
Ale_Zena_IT (2024-07-03 07:52:43+00:00): Hello,
make changeset that cover a huge area it's not a good practice. It make difficult monitoring activities (I was checking acitivites in Central African Republic and I came across your changeset).
So, please, consider to split your edits in a much small area. 
Thank you, happy mapping,
  Alessandro
Gangadi Anusha (2024-07-03 09:37:59+00:00): Thank you for the valuable feedback. Please feel free to point out similar suggestions in future as well.
Regards,
Anusha Gangadi
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-06 08:17:29+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1297894262/history has Id = 0 that was added in this edit
What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?
Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Or maybe this key can and should be documented as useful tagging schema?
Igorzo (2024-07-04 18:12:58+00:00): se ricordo bene di aver trovato in loco cartello che indicava il 429a come inagibile,  viene confermato anche sul sito CAI https://www.cai-fvg.it/sentieri-cai-fvg/settore-4-alpi-carniche/s4-429a/
micheleOSM3 (2024-07-04 18:55:58+00:00): Infatti l'ho impostato come inagibile, qual'è il problema?
arjunaraoc (2024-07-08 07:33:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153392804
arjunaraoc (2024-07-08 07:30:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153392878
arjunaraoc (2024-07-06 10:20:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my corrections vide https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153617703#map=15/14.9141/79.9884
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153393112
jtracey (2024-07-01 04:49:37+00:00): resolves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4314686
NeisBot (2024-07-01 04:52:24+00:00): Hi louis5227, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 88% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features!?

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=153393405
louis5227 (2024-07-01 04:54:26+00:00): It is intentional, in face I am reducing the parking station from many routes for same gate to one
arjunaraoc (2024-07-08 07:29:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153393411
arjunaraoc (2024-07-08 07:28:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Please check my edits at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153617703#map=15/14.9078/79.9806
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153393433
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-05 08:18:40+00:00): Reverted addition of SEO spam POI with just promotional description=*, name=* and missing any top-level tags in changeset 183681740

https://osm.org/changeset/183681740
Thelone1986 (2024-07-01 09:12:14+00:00): Bonjour, pourquoi avoir redessiné l'ancien tracé qui était déjà en cours de modification sur les dernières images satellite du SPW (mi-2023)?

Je ne vais pas prétendre que ce que j'avais mappé était 100% parfait, mais c'était cohérent par rapport aux différentes sources à ma disposition ici (SPW 2023, heatmap Strava et images Mapillary)
arjunaraoc (2024-07-06 09:15:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153393913
Wulf4096 (2024-08-18 15:47:21+00:00): Hi,
magst du bei highway=crossing bitte auch das crossing=*-Tag ergänzen?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=crossing?uselang=en
winnewoerp (2024-08-19 14:05:59+00:00): Ja, sorry, mache ich noch. Ich habe "frecher Weise" erst einmal nur das eingetragen, was ich für eine aktuelle Forschungsarbeit brauche und halte es im Übrigen für redundant, Crossing-Daten punkt- und linienbezogen anzugeben. Aber da mache ich jetzt natürlich kein Fass auf: Ich hole das zeitnah nach!!
chris66 (2024-08-04 20:05:57+00:00): Heissen die Straßen wirklich "Baustellenweg"?
KiloThree (2024-07-03 02:20:35+00:00): You've removed a couple features that don't seem to be removable based on aerial imagery, specifically the retaining wall for the turnpike ramps under WTC ave, and the ways entering the world trade center, what's the source of these?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153394409
cubbe8 (2024-07-03 02:24:28+00:00): I recently was near the WTC and the road loop and other ways entering the WTC have been removed as part of the revitalization.
dadavid (2024-07-01 09:55:10+00:00): Hi, 
thanks for contributing to OSM. 

However, this changeset is riddled with errors to the point where it is easier to reset it and start over. I have therefore reverted your changes and invite you to start fresh :) 

As this is your first changeset, it is not expected to be error free, so no hard feelings whatsover. If you are looking for pointers on what to improve next time, here are a few things i noticed: 

1) the park you added already exists in osm.
 
2) the hospitals you added dont exist IRL

3) the name=* key should not contain a generic description of an amenity. Therefore, "name"="游泳池" is not the correct tagging of a disused indoor swimming pool. 

4) landuse=residential does not belong on appartment buildings or any kind of buildings for that matter. 

Please take more time for your next changeset, consult the wiki at wiki.osm.org and feel free to ask me here if you have any further questions. 

greetings and happy mapping

David
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 03:22:57+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164878198
Piskvor (2024-07-01 10:52:07+00:00): Zdravím,

tohle není žst. Praha hl.n., ale dávná, už před desetiletími snesená (railway=razed) tramvajová trať na Žižkov...osobně bych ji v mapě ani nedržel, ale pokud už tam je, asi nemá smysl ji nějak detailněji popisovat (navíc co do zabzař - tam se jezdilo jen na rozhled).
Michal Polášek (2024-07-01 12:29:18+00:00): Zdravím taky, jde o omyl. Když jsem rušil zabezpečovač LS na hlavním nádraží, tak jsem při hromadném výběru segmentů mnoha kolejí omylem kliknul i na tuto trať a označil ji jako railway:ls=no, což nedává smysl. Pak jsem tuto vlastnost smazal, ale popsal to původním popisem pro rušení LS na hlavním nádraží :).
daveemtb (2025-12-03 15:05:06+00:00): I think this is an incorrect edit. The track looks like a gravel track with grass up the middle. This isn't a road.
Albe_ (2024-07-01 13:10:08+00:00): Thanks for noticing!
Jorisbo (2024-07-02 06:58:24+00:00): np, gr Joris
berndw (2024-07-01 14:35:39+00:00): Aber es gibt Stufen o.ä. um zwischen den Flächen zu wechseln.

Ich bin mit dem Löschen dieser Wege nicht einverstanden und bitte dich mit dem Ersteller darüber zu sprechen.
Jule_Beuel (2024-07-01 14:44:26+00:00): Es gibt einmal Stufen auf die Fläche, die wie eingezeichnet durch einen Zaun abgesperrt sind. Oben ist es eine Fläche unterbrochen durch Mauern. Da ist kein Weg.
arjunaraoc (2024-07-06 09:17:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).  Please try to upload changes in one small area as separate changeset for ease of review and provide helpful comments for the changeset regarding your edit.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153396947
Cucazer (2024-07-02 22:33:32+00:00): Hello, I'm not sure about the northern edge. Digital terrain imagery suggests that there is some water level 20-50 meters further out. Or is it now just a muddy reedbed with no constant water level? I'm not much familiar with this side of the lake though...
Nevertheless it's an improvement from the previous version!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153397008
Mezonens (2024-07-03 10:12:37+00:00): The water level of the lake depends on the time when the orthophoto was taken. Additionally, reedbeds are very common in marshes, and in this case, I wanted to show it as a marshy lake shore, where  it marsh gradually transitions into the lake with reeds. There isn't enough time to do everything at once :)
mini-me (2024-07-01 10:39:25+00:00): Правильный формат номера дома - 3А литА
Подробнее можно почитать в справке:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Адреса#Нумерация_домов
fūrai-bō_ (2024-10-01 05:31:38+00:00): この場所にローソンは存在しません。
「ファミリーマート 高松伏石町店」が存在します。
こちらで描き直しましたのでそちらでの修正作業は不要ですが、描く前によく確認された方が良いかと思いましたのでコメントさせていただきます。
Piagno (2026-03-11 12:58:42+00:00): Hi
As requested in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/the-defikarte-the-misleading-map/139618/48 i'm here now.

With this change you moved the fire_hydrant:ref to ref. But this node here isn't the fire hydrant. This node is the street lamp. On the street lamp there is a sign, which indicates the location/presence of a fire hydrant. You can see this, as the fire hydrant information is tagged as sign=fire_hydrant. 
By your move of the value you tell now the street lamp has the reference, which is wrong. The ref of the street lamp is unknown, and the ref of the fire_hydrant is known.
The fire hydrant actually is mapped with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11418878838 . 

So your (mechanical) edit was wrong.
the_third_man (2026-03-11 13:16:25+00:00): Okay, thanks for the heads-up. Then it would be better to separate the two pieces of information/nodes: one node for the lamp and one node for the sign. Agreed?
Piagno (2026-03-11 16:15:57+00:00): Well in this case there exists already another node just for the sign as well. But I don't know if there are two signs for the fire_hydrant.
Considering the sign you edited here:
I would leave it on the street lamp, because it is mounted to it.
And revert to the custom fire_hydrant:ref
the_third_man (2026-03-12 18:20:43+00:00): Well in this case there exists already another node just for the sign as well. But I don't know if there are two signs for the fire_hydrant.
Considering the sign you edited here:
I would leave it on the street lamp, because it is mounted to it.
And revert to the custom fire_hydrant:ref
the_third_man (2026-03-12 18:21:08+00:00): I don't think it's a good idea to leave it like this.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-30 03:26:53+00:00): I reverted this bogus edit in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183380985

Why you have not reverted/fixed otherwise it yourself despite "I don't think it's a good idea to leave it like this." and comment pointing out problem?

Is it necessary for others to review other edits done in this series for similarly broken objects?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-30 03:27:44+00:00): also, I opened https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5316908
Piagno (2026-05-30 06:30:22+00:00): thanks Mateusz :)
I personally didn't change anything because I'm not active or familiar with this area here ;)
Strubbl (2024-07-01 19:14:22+00:00): Hi, was testest du hier?
Strubbl (2024-07-01 19:16:25+00:00): I reverted this CS because it is only tests

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153426052
SekeRob (2024-07-12 10:31:31+00:00): Ciao, è eccellente che tu stia mappando tutte le tappe escursionistiche del CST. Ho scritto un commento a questo proposito sul forum della comunità se ci fosse qualche volontario che vuole questo sentiero di oltre 300 km. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/route-mapping-via-francigena-in-italia-valle-padana-e-toscana/105325/9

Qui si possono vedere molti cartelli, di diverso tipo. Alcuni sono scomparsi di recente lungo la nuova pista ciclabile da Scafa a De Contra.

Una nota. Il tipo di relazione in cui si combinano tutte le tappe è type=superroute. Ne ho appena terminato uno la scorsa settimana in bicicletta in 44 tappe, l'Appennino Bike Tour. 10 volte più lungo del CST.

Buon itinerario
Strubbl (2024-07-01 19:14:50+00:00): Bitte keine Gebäude löschen. Die Änderungen sind direkt live in der Karte. Auch nicht zum Test. Danke.
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-07 18:32:31+00:00): Hello,

This changeset has been reverted in part or full.  I appreciate the enthusiasm with adding railways, but OSM (OpenStreetMap) is only for what is on the ground now, not what once was on the ground.  I noticed you used older versions of map data to try and recreate the routes that once were (or may have once been).  In most cases, the railways have long been overbuilt and replaced by new buildings and projects, thus, no remnants or clear ROW exists.

"Historical" features, such as these long-gone railways would best be mapped on OHM (OpenHistoricalMaps) over at https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

You can read up on the general OSM guidelines here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

Additional info on non-existent features can be found here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nonexistent_features

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153673961
archie (2024-07-01 08:41:45+00:00): Genom denna cs har du brutit bussliner. Sedan några veckor har vi haft ordning på busslinjer (endast 4 st gap i hela Göteborgs Stad). Varför förstör du detta nu (igen)?
archie (2024-07-01 08:48:40+00:00): Hållplatsläge A3 fanns redan på annat ställe. Varför ger du dig på saker som du uppenbarligen inte förstår? Du förstör saker och ting.
PlayGuide (2024-07-21 22:08:34+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai remarqué que vous avez utilisé dans ce changeset (et peut être d'autres aussi) le tag playground=activitypanel pour désigner des panneaux du code de la route. Ça ne me paraît pas adapté du tout !
Le tag playground=* désigne des modules d'aires de jeux :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground
Je n'y connais rien en tag des panneaux, mais je pense que vous trouverez toutes les infos ici :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Signalisation_routi%C3%A8re_en_France