piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Osmwithspace (2025-08-21 12:48:39+00:00): Ist das ein Büro? Die Node hat aktuell keine Eigenschaften außer dem Namen.
matze089 (2025-08-21 14:28:13+00:00): Oh. Ja. Büro und Geschäftsstelle für einen Teeilbereich der RhönEnergieBus. Konnte vor Ort in OSM keine passenden Eigenschaften eingeben und habe bei der Bearbeitung das übersehen.
matze089 (2025-08-21 14:50:04+00:00): Habe es jetzt als Büro eingetragen
VictorIE (2025-11-27 17:34:42+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12965169313/

This feature is an indoor transformer. You can tell by: the style of the door, the triangular yellow warning signs and the stencilled name / reference number. Typically the reference number is in the format of '999999a', where 9 can be any number and 'a' can be the letters a, b, x or y, with x and y being most common. The name will be the original name given to the installation, so it might be out-of-date, spelled incorrectly or otherwise not-quite-right (this is Ireland after all).
danieldegroot2 (2025-12-05 10:25:42+00:00): Changed in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175541056
Firefishy (2025-07-01 11:59:47+00:00): Nice! Thank you for improving the map. Any other great local knowledge edits greatly appreciated. Try OSM cellphone apps https://streetcomplete.app/ or https://every-door.app/ to add edits directly from phone.
Yunkers (2026-02-07 19:50:30+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tych planowanych dróg?
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 00:43:05+00:00): Building footprints should not overlapp becasue they generally represent buildings on the same level. Building footprints should envelope one building and not a group of them. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168327031
eggie (2025-06-30 21:43:07+00:00): Dag S Gonzales.. access=no is bijna altijd verkeerd icm andere accesstags.
Het verkeersbord NL:C12
klopt volgens mij niet. 
Ik zet deze tags gewoon op het wegdeel.
.. en uiteraard op de bussluis.
en dan alles met een eigen regel.
'k Denk dat de wiki je op het verkeerde been zet.
De wiki zegt
motor_vehicle=no & moped=yes & mofa=yes & traffic_sign=NL:C12
Zo'n bord is dan gewoon 
traffic_sign=NL:C12   ... klaar.
Het gaat alleen om het bord.. Daar hoef je geen accesstags op te zetten. 


maaarrrrrrr je tagt dan op het wegdeel..
motor_vehicle=no
moped=yes
mofa=yes

en dan als uitzondering
psv=yes (doe meestal bus=yes, want onder psv vallen bv ook taxi's) 
Maar als het goed is is bus=yes ook default

Op de bussluis zet ik dan dezelfde tags plus voor de zekerheid, (maar al default foot=yes) en bicycle=yes naast de al bovenstaande tags.

implies
    motor_vehicle=no
    bus=yes
    foot=yes
    bicycle=yes

De verkeersborden zet ik overigens gewoon op de plek waar ze echt staan. 
Verbinden met de weg kan ook.

De WIKI.... en die gaat dus over het taggen van de access op het wegdeel. Niet op het bord.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-06-30 21:46:33+00:00): Volgens mij hoort hier nergens access=no Tags van mapper R_S zie ik.
eggie (2025-06-30 21:53:04+00:00): Ik heb het R_S even gevraagd. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165916984#map=17/51.586424/4.777558
gr eggie
CRCulver (2026-06-07 08:56:50+00:00): Please do not create bus stops with foreign-language names. You added here "Van to Cluj Napoca", but name= tags in Romanian should be in the local language, and in any event, this not the official name of this stop. You could help the community by retagging this.
StC (2025-07-22 20:41:18+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je vais essayer de réparer de mon mieux (pas facile, avec le commentaire peu compréhensible)
dahu83&04 (2025-07-23 07:44:40+00:00): a quelle endroit ? le tour du haut verdon ou le PR le tour de la colletta ?
vasony (2025-07-12 19:09:37+00:00): Szia!
Árpádházi Szent Erzsébet utcának mi a forrása, mindenhol térnek hivatkozzák és kötőjellel.
Tamás
totera (2025-07-01 07:46:24+00:00): Ciao Shadowfax, con start_date=C16 (vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date). È anche il caso di cambiare building da yes a church
user_5359 (2025-07-01 06:51:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't duplicate objects! If you want to name a park, use the existing area instead of adding a node.
cingramuwa (2025-07-01 13:37:25+00:00): Thank you! I did not realize I was duplicating.
Aenet (2025-06-30 21:17:18+00:00): source is web (meijer website), not survey
eggie (2025-06-30 22:36:19+00:00): Dag Remlicht. Ik heb hier wat aangepast.. Voetgangerszone.. paaltje aan de weg vastgemaakt  en nog wat vebindingen.
Mapse
eggie
msevilla00 (2025-07-01 07:09:09+00:00): Hola Sara,
Desde el móvil no se ve exactamente que hiciste aquí, creo que has borrado la fuente que creo recordar que como fuente decorativa sigue existiendo pero no como fuente para beber... este pequeño parque hay que darle una vuelta. Te envío esto a ver is te llega y me contestas por aquí o ya te digo por otra vía. :-)
Miguel
sara_nm (2025-07-01 12:38:34+00:00): Pues borre una fuente porque estaba duplicada. Tambien borré una fuente de agua potable que ya no existe
msevilla00 (2025-07-02 16:30:43+00:00): Genial! A ver si me paso a verlo de nuevo y le doy un repaso.
Esta es la vía por la que se comentan los conjuntos de cambios que se hacen en OSM y una vía de comunicación entre los usuarios (además de los mensajes internos desde osm.org, claro)
Gracias por tus contribuciones!
eggie (2025-06-30 22:04:05+00:00): Hoi.. De moestuin is nu een outer multypolygoon. Dat dat heeft hier geen functie.
Het zou evt een inner kunnen zijn in de outer van het grass.
De tag zal dan moeten zijn
leisure=garden
met een garden:type=..... community??? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgarden

Gr eggie
eggie (2025-06-30 22:09:13+00:00): Ik heb van de outer een inner gemaakt in de landuse grass.

Het is nog wel steeds een bloembed.
Wellicht leisure=garden beter?
VictorIE (2025-07-07 23:08:17+00:00): Thank you. Do you know what went wrong?
LordGarySugar (2025-07-07 23:39:22+00:00): There was one validator error around the Silent Valley Reservoir (the South Dam), and another at Spelga Dam. I think it was with ways set as inner members despite sharing nodes with the outer way or the MP. (Hence why I've drawn the outer way around the Reservoir now)
VictorIE (2025-07-08 01:47:05+00:00): Thank you.
NeisBot (2025-06-30 23:36:36+00:00): Hi dusannnovakovic, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added a new house building with address details."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
Hufkratzer (2025-07-01 21:03:51+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1321737288 seems to be a building. leisure=pitch is not a building type. If it is an indoor arena, you can tag it like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1298627976
user_5359 (2025-07-01 08:59:40+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/272j.
What is the mean of the tags
data_utwor = 1997-02-17Z
fop_id = 103048
gid = 133878
fop=PL.ZIPOP.1393.PP.3021113.2479
? By the way Did you mean source instead of website?
Yog Sot (2025-07-01 11:28:36+00:00): yeah, it might have been source, not the website. I looked up an existing monument and website looked like a valid choice. 

as for data_utwor = * It should have been creation date or something of sorts, but yeah, was tired and forgot about it

as for `fop_id` and `gid` well, those are some identifiers and supposedly OSM encourages us to create new tags xD so i think those are okey and maybe someone gonna use it

thse are from this 
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/783766269707026483/1173408240445440000/gdos_pominiki_przyrody_powierzchniowe.geojson?ex=68647315&is=68632195&hm=83326d3e706d71900a2b950911df4e85869582cfc448bd85ee963f5b5221cccb&

and you can confirm at  https://geoserwis.gdos.gov.pl/mapy/?usedesktop=true
Yog Sot (2025-07-01 13:35:37+00:00): what do you think would be best tag for the date?  
heritage:date=  
designation_date=
start_date ???

I think heritage:date is best, although not documented of course. 

The tree is older that its official start of protection date
mueschel (2025-07-02 17:56:43+00:00): The start of protection is often tagged as "inscription_date", mostly with a prefix denoting the organization 
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/inscription_date#similar

The two id tags can be in OSM, if they give a reference to some other public database. The common scheme for such ids is "ref:XYZ" with XYZ being the abbreviation for the database.
Yog Sot (2025-07-03 14:16:17+00:00): okey, thx, I made those changes at /168446495
NeisBot (2025-07-01 00:29:35+00:00): Hi kelfino, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 245 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=168331050
Kelvin_lee (2025-07-01 00:37:09+00:00): Yes these deletions were intentional, I am planning on shaping the buildings again since they were done incorrectly.
woodpeck (2025-07-01 07:07:44+00:00): The "changeset comment" field is intended for exactly this kind of information - explain what you did and why to other human beings. It would have been appropriate to write "deleted buildings, I am in the process of redrawing them because they were done incorrectly". Instead, you wrote the hashtag-salad "#hotosm-project-16207;#DisasterResponse;#ESADisasterResponse;#DRCFloods;#DRC" which nobody outside a close circle of humanitarian mappers will be able to understand. Please put hashtags in the hashtags field, and a human-readable message in the changeset comment.
Kelvin_lee (2025-07-01 14:38:20+00:00): Understood, still new to this but ill start to explain more in the future to let others know, thanks.
aharvey (2025-07-03 02:41:42+00:00): hi could you please comment on the discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/melbourne-disused-rail-line-during-construction/132185
Glassman (2025-07-01 22:26:55+00:00): #TIP: we don't use descriptive names like name=House. Also, the road up to the house is typically tagged as highway=service + service=driveway. I made the changes. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168331717
Josef73 (2026-01-20 16:38:14+00:00): Hallo, die Werte im Tag opening_hours sind nicht so richtig interpretierbar. Bitte nochmals prüfen. Danke.
berndw (2026-01-24 10:43:33+00:00): Habe die Öffnungszeiten anhand der Webseite korrigiert
Dimitar155 (2025-07-31 20:35:04+00:00): Като допълнение на коментара ми от другата промяна: хубаво е да се избягват описателни имена. Наличието на man_made=manhole + manhole=drain прави излишно добавянето на name=Дъждоприемна шахта. За справка - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions.

Дъждовните шахти нямат публично известни референтни кодове. Може би Софийска вода или Столична община имат някакви вътрешни кодове, но те не са отбелязани, както са отбелязани на повечето осветителни стълбове.
flex16 (2026-02-07 13:14:14+00:00): Mal ne Frage:

Warum hast du mal den smoothness tag von diesem Feldweg entfernt?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176646957/
War das gewollt? Ich sehe keinen Sinn darin ein smoothness Tag zu entfernen.
vichada (2026-02-08 07:38:33+00:00): Sorry. Ja, sehe da auch keinen sinn.
Denke nicht das das so beabsichtigt war. 
Selbst wenn sich etwas an der "smoothness" geaendert haette^1 - haette ich das normal einfach angepasst.... 

(^1 Ist aber jetzt schon wieder zu lange her...)
honnip (2025-07-02 02:51:28+00:00): 이미 node/12192179616 에 매핑되어 있습니다. 그리고 새 장소를 추가할 때, 다른 장소를 수정하지 말고 새 노드를 추가하세요.

changeset/168377548 에서 되돌리고, changeset/168377655 에서 추가 정보를 입력했습니다.
honnip (2025-07-02 02:33:26+00:00): 관련이 없거나 실수라고 생각되는 부분을 changeset/168377412 에서 되돌렸습니다. 만일 아니라면 말씀해 주세요.
nurdafur (2025-08-08 05:51:51+00:00): Hallo Manuel
Das waren definitiv nicht nur Verbesserungen, die du da gemacht hast. Das letzte Stück der Leunastraße hast du als Einbahn von der Autobahnauffahhrt weg eingetragen, statt in die korrekte Richtung. Und die U-Turn-Relation hast du auch nicht angepasst. Ich habe beides korrigiert. Die Navi-Benutzer*innen werden sich freuen, nicht einen riesigen Umweg fahren zu müssen.
Liebe Grüße 
Urs
literan (2025-07-01 16:46:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/198329228 bicycle=yes на точке перекрестка это типа там можно на велике проехать? ) но это значение по умолчанию для автодорог
solenoid jam (2025-07-05 09:57:43+00:00): Где то в вики было, что если велодорожка отмечена как автодорога + cycleway=lane, то наличие на ней велосветофоров указывается как bicycle=yes
В общем, за отсутствием тэга для велосветофора, добавляем доп атрибут на обычный светофор.
felipeeugenio (2025-07-01 12:22:59+00:00): Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones.
Acabo de corregir varios errores. Está todo bien y no fue nada grave, pero por favor tener en consideración que no usamos nombres descriptivos ni genéricos.

La plaza tiene un nombre, pero no todos sus senderos tienen ese nombre. Lo mismo con los accesos a los colegios.

Las veredas igual. no tienen nombre.

saludos
Matx_29 (2025-07-02 00:36:17+00:00): Leí tu mensaje después de poner los nombre de nuevo xd, ya para la próxima
Matx_29 (2025-07-02 00:36:46+00:00): Leí tu mensaje después de poner los nombre de nuevo xd, ya para la próxima
felipeeugenio (2025-07-02 00:39:37+00:00): Hola. No es problema. Gracias por la actitud. 
Lo importante es aprender. 

Saludos
aharvey (2025-07-01 05:38:53+00:00): Does this appear on the imagery here, it doesn't line up with any of the imagery sources we have.

What's DLR stand for?
thekenfliege (2025-07-01 06:06:54+00:00): DLR: www.dlr.de

we have set up this telescope 2019, this imagery is old, there are many more telescope stations (and even the area has increased)
aharvey (2025-07-01 06:16:39+00:00): Thanks! I added https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q157332 as the operator:wikidata.
aharvey (2025-07-01 07:27:50+00:00): Should this be considered within/part of the Mount Kent Observatory complex?

https://www.unisq.edu.au/study/why-unisq/unisq-stories/research-stories/smartnet seems to suggest so, in which case we should extend https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/516925285 to cover this site and then also tag man_made=observatory on that way.

Then this way could be tagged man_made=telescope + telescope:type=optical would that be a better fit?

What do you think?
aharvey (2025-07-01 07:32:02+00:00): Actually I'm not sure since the other telescopes are tagged as man_made=observatory within the amenity=university.

It just doesn't seem right to tag the site as amenity=university since it's a dedicated research site run by the university but not a university where students go to classes or researchers have normal offices.
QuiLe (2026-03-15 20:48:31+00:00): Hello, is there actually a road that runs through here? I was checking the images I took and I don't see a road here it looks like a pedestrian footway. 

Xin chào, thực sự có con đường nào chạy qua đây không? Tôi vừa xem lại những bức ảnh mình đã chụp và không thấy có đường ở đây; trông nó giống như một lối đi bộ thì đúng hơn.
fortera_au (2025-07-01 05:26:09+00:00): Hey, should the address have been removed? I would have thought that wouldn't have changed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168335057
fs_LT (2025-07-01 05:38:44+00:00): plz no CS across europe
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168335616
rskedgell (2025-07-30 12:47:43+00:00): Hi,

I see that, although you're an armchair mapper apparently based in Saskatoon, CA, that you have added a footway in Homerton, London, GB.

This footway is entirely decorative: it does not connect to any other highways and it does not capture any of the physical properties of the sidewalks on Tilehurst Street, Ashenden Road, Adley Street and Marsh Hill. It is at best useless for pedestrian and related applications for people who actually live here.
rskedgell (2025-07-30 12:57:49+00:00): Deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169719813
adiatmad (2025-07-01 07:54:09+00:00): Hello, hope you are doing well.
Would you mind sharing how you accessed the imagery source?
You mentioned Google Satellite, but I checked in my Vespucci app and couldn't find that option.
----
မင်္ဂလာပါ၊ မင်းအေးချမ်းသာယာနေပါတယ်လို့ မျှော်လင့်ပါတယ်။
Imagery source ကို ဘယ်လိုရယူတာလဲဆိုတာ ပြောပြပေးလို့ရမလားခင်ဗျာ/ခင်ဗျာ?
မင်းက Google Satellite လို့ရေးထားတာကို မြင်ပါတယ်၊ ဒါပေမဲ့ ကျွန်တော်/ကျွန်မ Vespucci မှာတော့ အဲဒီ imagery မတွေ့ရပါဘူး။
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168337035
t_ja (2025-07-03 16:35:08+00:00): Ahoj,
naozaj je nutné skracovať názvy zastávok? 
Dôvod, prečo sú uvedené v skrátenej forme v cestovnom poriadku je šetrenie miestom na papieri (robí to napríklad aj SAD Žilina). Reálne ale šoférovi poviem "Považská Teplá" a nie "Pov.Teplá" :)
Aj hodnoty tagov "network" a "operator" rozpisujeme, tak prečo nepoužiť plný názov aj pre názvy zastávok?
Na skrátený názov by sa mohol použiť tag "official_name": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:official_name

T.
Graf Westerholt (2025-07-04 20:17:00+00:00): Levidianto, hast du eine gute Erklärung dafür, dass du am 1. Juli 2025 die Daten des GEPA-Weltladen gelöscht hast? Ich war heute in dem Laden und habe eingekauft
Vinber-Pro (2025-07-17 16:35:49+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour cette contribution

c'est tout l'intérêt d'OpenStreetMap de pouvoir corriger ce que l'on connaît bien !

n'hésitez pas si vous avez des questions !
Sanniu (2025-07-14 05:47:19+00:00): Hi, is the https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1411081335 - roundabout?
Kaduna (2025-07-15 09:04:24+00:00): Hi Sanniu, thanks for reaching out. I have re-assessed my edits based on your query. I have made the geometry update based on satellite imagery but could not verify if it is a roundabout or a circular junction due to the unavailability of fresh ground-level imagery. Please let me know if there are publicly available sources that can verify the junction classification, or please go ahead and add the tag if you have local knowledge.
timothé baleras (2025-07-01 06:52:44+00:00): local knowledge
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-02 05:42:49+00:00): You added the house number to the tag addr:place. I don't know how it was possible in StreetComplete, but it's wrong. I reverted the change.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168380726
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-02 05:44:11+00:00): But the house number previously has been also added to the proper tag, so no worries
user_5359 (2025-07-01 06:53:06+00:00): wrong description correct address notation
NoXQS (2025-07-01 07:40:52+00:00): been walking here, strava relies on OSM data, so if affects my walking distance.
spiregrain (2025-07-03 09:49:33+00:00): Hello! And welcome to OSM.  Thank-you for adding this footpath.   I've made a couple of changes - so that the main footpath is not blocked by the gate on the side path round the back of No. 13-23.   I also extended the path up to the north - to help routers.  

If  you want to add more sidewalks in future, it would be good to extend them to connect to pre-existing ways; for routers.

Welcome again!
woodpeck (2025-07-01 19:31:26+00:00): I have hidden a series of comments here in which user KlopanRin used racist language to express their exasperation at OSM closing changesets after one hour of inactivity, which they apparently did not know.
Larmax (2025-07-06 11:27:17+00:00): Hi, why are you adding unofficial English names again?
eggie (2025-07-01 07:15:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedbackk   Bever stond hier op de kaart. De extra info heb ik samengevoegd.


MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Remlicht89 (2025-07-01 19:13:51+00:00): Bedankt voor het aanpassen van de foot=yes. Ik heb me even extra ingelezen in het verschil tussen foot=yes en foot=designated. Verschil is nu duidelijk.
eggie (2025-07-01 19:39:25+00:00): Yep.. veel accesstags zijn al ingebakken.. default.
NeisBot (2025-07-01 07:54:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-05 19:36:30+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/168536651
velomeloman (2025-07-01 12:05:44+00:00): Не надо ничего ломать. Есть велополоса, обозначенная на асфальте. И это уж точно не path.
literan (2025-07-01 16:43:58+00:00): velomeloman, это вполне способ мапить совмещенную/разделенную пешевелодорожку:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway

The cycleway=* tagging is used on way linear features tagged with highway=* to map cycling infrastructure that is an inherent part of the road. This specifically applies to:

    cycle lanes which are part of the road without any physical separation from the other lanes except the painting on the road (don't map them as separate ways),
    cycle tracks that are running parallel and next to the road (consider map them as separate ways with highway=cycleway, or highway=path + bicycle=designated in case of shared foot- and bicycle ways).
velomeloman (2025-07-01 16:48:04+00:00): Он менее информативный. Утеряна информация о взаимном распоряжении пешеходной и велополосы. А главный вопрос - зачем?
literan (2025-07-01 20:05:45+00:00): могу сказать, что зато он более информативен за счет отображения на рендерах, что полезно если ты планируешь маршрут не навигатором, а визуально, по карте.

впрочем, разбирайтесь сами) я там не был 20 лет
ad47 (2025-07-04 06:02:28+00:00): К сожалению проблема в том, что не велополоса, а "велопешеходная дорожка с разделением на велосипедную и пешеходную стороны дорожки", знак 4.5.4
То есть это тогда скорее cycleway по иерархии (мы же не обозначаем дворовые проезды как footway с уточнением, что на машине можно).
ManuelB701 (2025-09-10 11:24:39+00:00): War das Löschen eines Fußweges eines Gebäudes sowie die Verschiebung einer Einfahrt, sodass dieser die Straße kreuzt, wirklich nötig?
SzymonH (2025-07-01 08:05:57+00:00): Plus poprawki POI
SzymonH (2025-07-01 08:10:51+00:00): Dodane: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168341000
022 (2025-07-01 08:29:26+00:00): To expand on my point about the admin_level; 

Previously in some rural areas the parishes functioned as Local Service Districts ie. the LSD of Canning, so they functioned similarly to a municipality. Now the new (2023) municipalities themselves have taken precedence, which is why the parishes (currently tagged as admin_level=6) should probably be reduced to admin_level=8. I will work further on this when I have the time...