piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
totera (2025-02-26 00:31:09+00:00): Sul caso in questione: chi decide se l'incrocio è grande abbastanza o il salvagente è troppo piccolo? La regola generale è che a separazione fisica corrispondono percorsi diversi, e qui era rispettata, le isole di via Marconi erano mappate così da 13 anni... a mio avviso l'eliminazione dei percorsi separati non migliora nulla ma è anzi una netta regressione della qualità della mappa.

Più in generale: tutto ciò che esiste nella realtà può essere mappato, a un livello di minore o maggiore dettaglio; nessuno è obbligato al micromapping ma chi vuole mappare tombini o grate può farlo, e ciò che per un utente è inutile o insignificante può essere di interesse per un altro.
Nel corso degli anni le pratiche di mappatura hanno subito una continua evoluzione (sia per l'esperienza riscontrata nell'uso dei dati, sia per l'introduzione di immagini aeree ad alta risoluzione, editor da dispositivi mobili, ecc.) e la wiki risente di queste stratificazioni ma il consenso generale è che modifiche intese a ritornare a uno stile di mappatura più semplice non siano opportune.

Poi salta fuori spesso qualcuno che cancella gli alberi perché "non ha senso inserire i singoli alberi nella mappa" ma è un problema di mancata comprensione delle caratteristiche (e potenzialità) del progetto.

Aggiungo che accade pure, e non so se è il tuo caso, che c'è chi fa un uso professionale dei dati e si lamenta "ma io ci devo lavorare, tutti questi dettagli mi fanno perdere tempo". Chi ha di questi problemi faccia pure tutte le semplificazioni e pre-elaborazioni che vuole, ma in locale.
gurglypipe (2025-02-24 12:55:41+00:00): Yeah, agreed, I think it's been moved from the skate park a while back
aharvey (2025-02-24 23:15:44+00:00): from your link this looks like a shared path, not exclusivly for bicycles only, is that the case?

If so in iD there is a "Shared Path" preset otherwise best to apply both bicycle=designated and foot=designated then segregated=no.
haegaragain (2025-02-25 02:36:15+00:00): I've used the shared path preset for the majority of the route along Kingsway; it's just the Banksia Ave section that has the dedicated bike path (there's just about 1s of it in the TfNSW video). The southern side of Denman Ave is also bike-only, though it's only marked as such at each end of that section. The shared path preset doesn't include segregated=no --- I'll add it in for those parts. Thanks!
aharvey (2025-02-28 00:49:08+00:00): Thanks for confirming you had it correct.
muralito (2025-02-24 22:47:17+00:00): Hola. En los elementos que ya estan descriptos de forma clara por las etiquetas, como es el caso de shop=hardware no va "Ferreteria" en el nombre. Lo mismo con farmacias, panaderias, etc.
eggie (2025-02-24 07:29:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Beter gewoon schuiven met de bestaande adresnodes.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-23 23:50:45+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1362425678

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-02-24 07:35:09+00:00): De adresnode heb ik hersteld en naar je gekozen  locatie gesleept. Je eigen gemaakte adresnode verwijderd.
Het adres ligt nu wel op het gebouw en niet er naast.
Tip: Niet zelf adressen aanmaken. Gebruik de Kadasterimportadressen.
MVG
eggie
jdmonin (2025-02-23 23:58:25+00:00): *red trail
hwierzbicki (2025-04-13 16:47:58+00:00): Hi Tex,

Please avoid using:
 "man_made"="communications_tower"

This tag is meant for very large landmark towers (e.g., CN Tower). For typical telecom structures, a better tag set is:

"man_made"="mast"
"tower:type"="communication"

See the wiki for more details. Thanks!
Tex2002ans (2026-05-16 19:03:55+00:00): Hey hwierzbicki.

Thanks for the comment. :)

Yes, it must've been a weird preset or something (sometimes ID names it one way, then JOSM names it a slightly different way).

And for future knowledge, here's the 2 wiki articles you mentioned:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcommunications_tower
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dtower

- - -

There's a similar situation with "big lights around a stadium" or "park" or "sports field".

In ID, you just type `light` and get an easy "lighting mast" preset:

- `man_made=mast`
- `tower:type=lighting`

with a little "giant stadium light"-looking icon.

But in JOSM, you sometimes have to constantly look at the OSM wiki and try to parse out what the exact differences are between the technical names.

(One little trick I like to do is temporarily use ID to find/plop something down, then copy those tags over to JOSM.)

And because JOSM's `mast` icon just looks like "a little cellphone tower", I'd NEVER associate that with "stadium lights" subtype hidden underneath!
stevea (2025-02-24 02:19:48+00:00): It's awesome to see you "clearing TIGER road review"(s) as you continue to deepen and richen our local map data!
s777n (2025-02-24 08:13:53+00:00): Здравствуйте. Ваша правка была удалена.Школа уже была отмечена https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/67485668  и вы продублировали ее еще одной точкой.
aharvey (2025-02-25 00:09:46+00:00): hi I can see a number of issues here.

1. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=178701610829910&focus=photo seems to show a bike lane between the left turn lane and through traffic lanes. while I couldn't see any bicycle signage, I think it still can be considered a bicycle lane, there's no other reason they'd paint the road like that otherwise.

2. It appears you've removed a number of other valid tags like turn:lanes and lane width tags.

I think best we revert this change, unless you had any other comments about your change?
Starlight7813 (2025-02-28 19:48:50+00:00): 1. Local council does not include these as bike lanes on their maps anywhere.

2. Many of them only included information about the "bike lanes", though i do think adding the turn lanes back would be a good idea, and i can do that
aharvey (2025-03-04 00:44:02+00:00): We usually prefer to "map what's on the ground" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground rather than what only appears on other maps.
aharvey (2025-03-04 00:44:37+00:00): Though I know it's tricky when it's just the lane markings and no actual bicycle pictogram painted on the road or other signage, so I'll leave it to those on the ground here to decide.
nevw (2025-03-10 22:32:01+00:00): Hi, you appear to have duplicated the waterway.
One is named Arroyo Lerma Santiago and the other Arroyo Rio Lerma Santiago, Arroyo Rio Lerma Santiago is drawn in the wrong direction. Waterways are drawn in the downstream direction they flow.
I was going to map it to the River Río Grande de Santiago but want to know what the correct name is.
ZLima12 (2025-02-24 03:09:00+00:00): Previously, I had used network=US:NY:Parkway:PIPC on a couple of these roads, as part of the 2022 NY Parkway cleanup. This was kind of a questionable value from the beginning, since the PIPC is an interstate compact. To reflect this, I have moved it up to the US: namespace, rather than having it below US:NY.
ralley (2025-02-24 02:59:21+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comments: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162874415
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-24 08:01:16+00:00): Hi ralphdaddy, welcome to OSM!

It seems that the changeset you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-24 04:31:22+00:00): Guten Morgen Mk2025, willkommen bei OSM.

Vielen Dank für die Kartenänderungen und -ergänzungen. Für die Zusammenarbeit innerhalb des Projektes ist es hilfreich, wenn die vorgenommenen Änderungen in den Kommentaren kurz erläutert werden. So können andere die Arbeit leichter nachvollziehen. Einige nützliche Tipps zum Schreiben der Änderungskommentare findet sich im OSM Wiki: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Danke.
Allison P (2025-02-24 21:15:58+00:00): While trying to connect a road to many crosswalks, sometimes the suggested fixes move positions and I end up clicking the wrong one. Oops.
h551w (2025-02-24 23:02:39+00:00): Oh, I'm sure I've done the same before somewhere too
Ilovemap1999 (2025-02-25 02:40:36+00:00): C Ngan them :conditional nhen
NumisK (2025-04-24 11:07:25+00:00): Hello Simon Peter Makobi, Thank you for your contribution! I have removed the untagged polygon way 1362475677. Please inspect your task carefully before closing. Happy Mapping!
NeisBot (2025-02-24 05:01:09+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
NeisRevert (2025-03-13 10:53:02+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163564604
pwbriggs (2025-02-24 06:07:21+00:00): Thanks for the contribution, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I see the new buildings aren't in any aerial imagery yet, which makes it difficult to trace them. However, we can still add metadata about them. If you know the addresses of the new buildings, for example, feel free to add new address points in the buildings' approximate locations.

Thanks again!
Glassman (2025-02-25 00:45:37+00:00): I would also add that the editor can remove the object but save the address. Just copy the buildings tags to a node, then use right click on use the downgrade tool to remove excess tags, leaving just the address.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162876528
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Kogacarlo (2025-03-25 16:15:59+00:00): Toll gedeleted! Bitte reagier im Forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vandalism-by-mapper-physi/127930
gurglypipe (2025-02-24 10:07:46+00:00): Hiya, thanks for trying to improve the one-way system in Lancaster, but I think motor_vehicle=permit is the most appropriate tagging, according to the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#List_of_possible_values).

motor_vehicle=no means access by motor vehicles is physically impossible (e.g. due to the road being too narrow) or completely illegal (e.g. no entry signs).

motor_vehicle=destination means that any vehicle is allowed as long as it’s going to a destination on that road. Typically this is signed in the UK as “except for access”.

The signage here says “authorised vehicles only”, which implies motor_vehicle=permit to me.
user_3828331 (2025-02-24 12:37:11+00:00): Yea I suppose so, it's a very tricky one as there isn't a 'Permit' as such to be obtained, to gain permissions. 'and Authorised Vehicles' as the sign shows isn't very descriptive. Haven't reviewed the highway code yes it does seem 'Permit' does however fit better. I'll make the change back now.
gurglypipe (2025-02-24 12:46:07+00:00): Thanks for double-checking :)
Vinber-Pro (2025-02-28 10:44:28+00:00): Bonjour,
à priori vous n'avez pas seulement ajouté un arbre et cela fait une grande modification ?

vous apprenez, c'est normal :)

bonne cartographie
ZLima12 (2025-02-24 06:25:51+00:00): Whoops, the tags were actually usually hgvtrimble=no.
dmlls (2025-07-28 09:44:21+00:00): Hola Ipintza,

Una pregunta, en https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1362529394/history/1#map=19/42.352730/-3.663243 creo que tuviste una pequeña confusión con el building:part=terrace?

Recuerda que esta etiqueta no se utiliza para lo que en español llamaríamos terraza (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:building%3Dterrace).

Me dices y si eso lo actualizamos.

Un saludo!
stosh77 (2025-03-02 23:52:14+00:00): Revised.
aharvey (2025-02-24 23:12:41+00:00): Previously it was tagged `compacted` which is "A mixture of larger (e.g., gravel typically 20mm) and smaller (e.g., sand) parts, compacted (e.g., with a roller), so the surface is more stable than loose gravel." per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dcompacted

You'll also see on the wiki that many roads signposted as "Gravel Road" in Australia would be tagged surface=compacted and not surface=gravel.

The `gravel` value is documented as "This tag has very large meaning range. Used for cases ranging from huge gravel pieces like track ballast used as surface, through small pieces of gravel to compacted surface." Typically I'd use surface=gravel for larger railway track ballast type of surfaces, then for fine gravel use surface=fine_gravel https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dfine_gravel

For a highly landscaped area like here it seems unlikely to be surface=gravel and surface=compacted seems more likely.

OSM tag values can't always be literally interpreted because this interpretation varies a lot among geographies.
aharvey (2025-05-14 08:28:31+00:00): This has since been fixed.
Lokai (2025-03-01 19:18:24+00:00): Hallo.

Danke für die Mitarbeit bei den Daten für die OSM-Datenbank.

Wenn der Weg nicht mehr existiert, was ist denn mit dem Weg, der nordöstlich der Teufelshütte im Wald endet?


Einen Pfad besser nicht löschen, sondern mit einem Präfix versehen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namespace

Schöner 


Gruß 

L.
NeisBot (2025-02-24 07:36:48+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck #NeisLab
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-26 06:01:02+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/162919899
Nirilanto Joela (2025-02-24 12:38:15+00:00): bonjour,

je viens de verifier votre contribution pendants le cours OSM ce matin, alors est ce que vous pouvez m'expliquez "Ajout SOL" car j'ai un peu mal compris

Merci Nirilanto
eggie (2025-02-24 07:37:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Alle begin is moeilijk. name=Voetbalveld heb ik verwijderd.
Niet name=... gebruiken als je iets beschrijft. ...  sport=soccer moet het doen.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
mavl (2025-05-13 15:09:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Vinber-Pro (2025-02-24 07:57:11+00:00): Bonjour,
bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap !

pour une église, il faut également préciser amenity=place_of_worship qui permet de qualifier le fait que ce batiment est un lieu de culte

voir la page ici par exemple : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship

pour le nom on va préférer aussi une écriture Église FLM

bonne carto, bonjour à Nirilanto

Vincent
s777n (2025-03-09 12:06:19+00:00): Ваша правка была удалена
mueschel (2025-02-25 08:43:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM.
please don't just dump a large set of data into our database. 

I suggest that you start with some basic editing of individual objects. Later you can come back to an import - but this is a complicated task, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
mavl (2025-02-25 10:06:05+00:00): This changeset is reverted.  
The reason: the duplicates of objects.
NeisReview (2025-03-06 10:09:16+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163275766
silversurfer83 (2025-02-24 20:04:49+00:00): Hi :)

wenn es ein ausgewiesener Wanderparkplatz (VZ317) ist, dann kann dies mit dem Zusatz "hiking=yes" am Parkplatz kenntlich gemacht werden.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a/W#Wanderparkplatz

happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162879655
NeisBot (2025-02-24 17:01:03+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
NeisRevert (2025-03-13 10:52:18+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163564583
bxl-forever (2025-02-24 08:49:42+00:00): Hello,

It looks like you didn’t calibrate the geographical data before importing from the Infrabel open data feed.

Do they use Lambert coordinates or some other reference system?

While some useful stuff was added, this edit also moved tracks far from their real location, which is clearly visible on the latest aerioal imagery.  I am afraid we’ll have to repair your edits once more.
Sikal (2025-02-24 09:16:24+00:00): Hello,

On parts not affected by the works at Y.Josaphat (L161/2, L28, ...), the track layout in OSM, the Infrabel layout and the tracks visible in the Urbis satellite images are correctly superimposed. This tells me that the layers were correctly calibrated.

From a few images that I can't use directly for mapping, the general shape of the tracks seems correct. We'll have to see with the next satellite images or updates of the dataset used.
bxl-forever (2025-02-24 11:25:39+00:00): With respect, I disagree with the view that the revised layout is correctly calibrated.  Look at the bottom part of this image, this is how it looks now after this change.
https://i.imgur.com/makYKhr.jpeg

Please observe: there is no such thing as "satellite" pictures for mapping in Belgium.  We rely on aerial pictures from UrbIS or numerical imagery, which gives official shapes of many items.

Don’t bother, I’ll try to fix it in the next days, or will ask someone to do it.
Andrea Musuruane (2025-02-27 15:49:44+00:00): Ciao. addr:city=Meugliano non e' corretto perche' addr:city e' sempre il comune dove si trova il numero civico. In questo caso Valchiusa. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162880841
silversurfer83 (2025-02-24 20:08:43+00:00): Hi :)

da sind jetzt die Eigenschaften des Museums und des Kinos eher zufällig zum Teil am Eingang und zum Teil am Gebäude. Das ist eher ungünstig und sollte korrigiert werden. Die Details der POIs sollten alle am POI (ist hier leider aktuell auf dem Gebäudeumriss) und die Details, die *nur* den Eingang betreffen, sollten auch nur am Eingang erfasst werden.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162880892
eggie (2025-03-14 21:04:15+00:00): Hoi..
Rood/wit is geen valide tag.

Kijk je nog even?

Mvg
eggie
Andrea Musuruane (2025-02-27 15:50:28+00:00): Ciao. In questo POI manca il tag name. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162881047
b-jazz (2025-02-25 18:43:37+00:00): Hi there Course,

I noticed that you tried to make the fairway and green get very close to each other without actually touching. It is very important that they don't overlap, but it is equally important that there is no gap between them (except for those golf courses where the greens are specifically manicured to be separated from the fairway). But in the case of this particular hole, the fairway and greens should be sharing the same nodes at their boundary, not inches away from each other.

For more information, see the wiki page for golf courses at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls

Thanks.
bxl-forever (2025-02-24 08:43:43+00:00): Les adresses des maisons ont déjà changé officiellement ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223280816
Ixelles_Elsene (2025-02-24 12:49:59+00:00): Le changement est effectif, en effet, depuis le premier novembre 2024 https://www.ixelles.be/uploads/conseil/pv/238.pdf
mais il y a eu une période transitoire.
bxl-forever (2025-02-24 13:59:13+00:00): OK, nous allons corriger les adresses et nettoyer les erreurs.
eggie (2025-03-14 21:06:31+00:00): Dag Carlo..
Rood/Wit is heen osm tag. =red?

Kijk je nog even?
Mvg
eggie
jplumail (2025-05-03 21:29:39+00:00): Bonjour,

Pourquoi as-tu supprimé le nom de la rue sur le bâtiment https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/64956284/history ?
TheFighter137 (2025-05-03 21:41:18+00:00): Bonsoir,
Cela est probablement une erreur de ma part lors de l'intégration des adresses de la commune. Le numéro 2180 ne disposant manifestement pas de point séparé pour le moment, le nom de rue peut ainsi être réintégré au bâtiment.
Merci d'avoir signalé ce problème.
NeisBot (2025-02-24 17:01:04+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-13 10:50:47+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/162934887
citrula (2025-02-24 11:47:06+00:00): You added this business as a node attached to a railway. Please do the built-in tutorial and try again.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162888908
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-13 11:06:27+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/162888908
ZLima12 (2025-02-24 08:55:05+00:00): I removed ref=GSPC because this is a simple abbreviation of the full name, rather than a code that was consciously assigned by the authorities.
grzegorz75jan (2025-02-24 09:42:03+00:00): Thx for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1296096359
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162881726
TrickyFoxy (2025-03-06 13:12:41+00:00): 👋 Пожалуйста, используйте contact:telegram и contact:whatsapp. Они более популярные и задокументированы на вики https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:*
TrickyFoxy (2025-03-06 13:15:24+00:00): Аналогично здесь https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158728381
Soshal Distan Singh (2025-03-06 13:30:16+00:00): @kate_rocketdata
По поводу этой конкретной клиники - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17167644/history - я бы ещё спросил, зачем питерскому филиалу московский номер телефона ставить :? Там же есть единый бесплатный: https://sankt-peterburg.mamadeti.ru/clinics/md-lakhta/
kate_rocketdata (2025-03-13 07:29:53+00:00): Добрый день! Спасибо за ваши уточнения. Как только выясним вопрос с телефоном - дадим обратную связь.
kate_rocketdata (2025-03-19 07:48:24+00:00): @Soshal Distan Singh
Добрый день! Да, вы правы, оставим для всех единый номер.
Tomas09 (2025-03-09 19:44:16+00:00): Nu gaat routering eroverheen alsof de brug er nog is maar die is er nu niet. Is access=no of iets anders niet beter hiervoor?
eggie (2025-03-09 19:51:40+00:00): Dag Tomas, Wanneer er geen brug meer is dan kan die gewoon weg. 
Komt de brug niet meer terug?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-09 19:53:20+00:00): Brug voorlopig verwijderd.
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.98395,5.948941,19/?datastrip=20250203_PNEO-04
Tomas09 (2025-03-09 20:32:42+00:00): 👍
eggie (2025-03-09 20:37:33+00:00): Toch nog even aangepast en de brug op proposed gezet anders gaat de historie verloren.
De note maar open laten... Bij terugplaatsing de tagging dan weer terugzetten.
Denk dat je proposed dan niet ziet renderen op de kaart.
eggie (2025-03-09 20:41:29+00:00): Tagging nu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1360216155
eggie (2025-02-24 09:08:34+00:00): Hi MBL,

Welcome to OSM....   Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution.

Greetz,
eggie