piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Ltrlg (2026-02-27 12:45:12+00:00): 👋 Bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap et merci pour votre ajout !

Votre modification m’intrigue :

 – Pourquoi avez-vous créé un second bâtiment plutôt que simplement modifié celui existant ?
 – Pourquoi avez-vous classifié ces bâtiments comme bâtiments d’habitation ?

J’ai simplifié pour le premier point dans changeset/179129740, mais laissé pour l’instant pour le second.

D’autre part, ce bâtiment était déjà noté comme hébergeant KPMG (node/8964262670). Savez-vous si c’est toujours le cas ou si le CIO le remplace ?
blongeon (2026-02-27 13:11:47+00:00): Bonjour, le CIO est un service public qui est hebergé dans le même immeuble que KPMG. Il me paraissait problématique d'indiquer le même code GPS pour un service public et pour un établissement de conseil aux entreprises. Est-ce que l'affichage peut indiquer seulement le CIO ?
Ltrlg (2026-03-02 10:34:28+00:00): >  Il me paraissait problématique d'indiquer le même code GPS pour un service public et pour un établissement de conseil aux entreprises.

Ça ne nécessite pas de dupliquer le bâtiment, il suffisait d’ajouter un point pour le CIO (comme je l’ai fait dans changeset/179129740), de la même manière que pour le point KPMG existant.

Mais si les deux existent au même endroit, il n’y a aucun problème à ce qu’ils partagent le même « code GPS » : c’est simplement une description de la réalité.

(Cela écrit, la position actuelle des points dans le bâtiment est probablement erronée ; vous pouvez l’améliorer si vous avez plus de détails.)

> Est-ce que l'affichage peut indiquer seulement le CIO ?

OpenStreetMap est une base de donnée géographique, pas une carte. Nous enregistrons ce qui existe sur le terrain, charge aux divers rendus de choisir ce qu’ils affichent et comment ils le priorisent.

Le rendu par défaut sur osm.org (nommé « OpenStreetMap Carto ») est un rendu aux objectifs multiples (et souvent contradictoires), qui ne peut pas convenir à tous les usages. Vous pouvez en utiliser d’autres ; par exemple le rendu « Humanitaire » affiche uniquement le CIO à cet emplacement (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/47.445013/-0.545475&layers=HN).
NeisBot (2026-02-27 09:21:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 16 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1483748661 v1 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1483748662 v1 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13604951317 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179121143
ivanbranco (2026-02-27 09:29:53+00:00): Ciao lwebmaster,

hanno davvero creato una ciclabile parallela ad un'altra ciclabile? O è un doppione? Vedi ad esempio: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/21776375/history 

In generale se al momento dell'upload il sito ti avvisa di differenti 27 errori, sarebbe il caso di fermarsi e capire cosa sia andato storto prima di procedere.
LucianoC63 (2026-03-01 20:44:28+00:00): No, nessun raddoppio di ciclabile. Forse si voleva inserire pista dedicata alla navetta elettrica? Attendo contatti da utente o interventi in questi cambiamenti(changeset).
NeisBot (2026-02-27 09:24:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1469105098 v7

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Self storage facility"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Instalación de almacenamiento propio"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-07 17:33:05+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179502825
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
BCNorwich (2026-03-03 06:17:32+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You placed your building on top of an existing building, that's duplication. I've removed the duplicate and placed your new tags on the existing building. Please make corrections to any existing feature.

Regards Bernard.
AbinayaSivakumar (2026-03-03 07:00:47+00:00): Hi Bernard,
Thank you for correcting it and explaining. I understand now about avoiding duplicate buildings. I’ll be more careful to check existing features before adding new ones.
Regards,
Abinaya
DodoGTA (2026-02-27 09:44:14+00:00): Does the place have opening hours listed?
muyrety (2026-02-27 10:01:25+00:00): I found some on their facebook page, updated
NeisBot (2026-02-27 09:36:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/840210098 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Self storage facility"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Instalación de almacenamiento propio"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-07 17:33:08+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179502827
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-02-27 10:09:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/5633413467 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cleaning services building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-07 17:33:09+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179501500
cytryn (2026-02-28 15:23:26+00:00): Zmiana do wycofania. Jeżeli na ternie budynku znajduje się jakiś klub sportowy, to należy go dodać jako nowy punkt w miejscu, gdzie faktycznie się znajduje, a nie nadawać nazwę punktu całemu budynkowi.
Enock4seth (2026-02-28 13:25:11+00:00): Hi, use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=residential for this instead.  I have update and simplified most of the ways you have added here as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=footway.
eggie (2026-02-27 11:44:51+00:00): Dag volgerr,
Alleen access=private is voldoende.
Mvg
eggie
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 14:50:33+00:00): Split SEO POI from highway node and cleaned up remaining SEO spam tags for POI in changeset 184435883

https://osm.org/changeset/184435883
mavl (2026-02-28 15:22:00+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот (и некоторые другие ) пакет правок отменён. Дорога была сдвинута на 36 метров от истинного положения, были изменены статусы дорог (федеральная трасса - это точно не дорога класса service), удалено название улицы.
literan (2026-02-28 10:02:48+00:00): неверно. Вход в метро разрешен его клиентам. Верну тег.
DarkNark (2026-04-07 06:26:44+00:00): Bonjour. L'intersection Maison Blanche / Pont al Louet a été réaménagé. Les images IGN ont 2 ans maintenant et ne sont plus à jour. Segment à supprimer
Kaduna (2026-04-08 16:22:06+00:00): Hi DarkNark, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you
Kaduna (2026-04-12 06:08:17+00:00): Hi DarkNark, 

Thank you for letting me know about the status of IGN imagery. I was also able to verify your remark later on from recent GPS traces. I’ll be more aware while working with IGN imagery
Yog Sot (2026-02-27 21:18:49+00:00): ale ta ścieżka chyba compacted jest tylko zachodni kawałeczek? czy coś się zmieniło od 2025?
db-ak (2026-02-27 21:22:03+00:00): zmieniło, patrz fotki ze źródeł. Obie strony mają teraz podobną nawierzchnie. Może da się odgrzebać dokumentację z przetargu Lubonia bo też tam było
Yog Sot (2026-02-27 22:45:54+00:00): to pięknie bardzo
Enock4seth (2026-02-28 13:10:49+00:00): Hi NACHINDI _ ABDUL _RAUF, thanks for mapping and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please STOP using Bing Maps Aerial imagery for adding new data in this area. Bing is very out-of-date. Kindly use Esri World Imagery or Mapbox Satellite which are much newer here as background. 

This is how you can select other background imagery in ID Editor https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/imagery/#changing-the-background-aerial-imagery

And a comprehensive introduction to using the iD Editor https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/
ratrun (2026-02-27 15:44:50+00:00): You uploaded duplicated infrastructure! Please stop doing so! 
I fixed it manually.
NeisBot (2026-02-27 11:39:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/6037317567 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Vegan bakery"
---
Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего текста могла бы быть: "Веганская пекарня"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-07 17:33:10+00:00): ❌ Text fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/179137986
aTarom (2026-02-27 15:43:31+00:00): reverted at changeset 179137241, https://t.me/osmcat/71884, no user response
TrickyFoxy (2026-04-05 19:50:11+00:00): Но вы его внесли...
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-27 12:13:17+00:00): Could you clarify what you're trying to do here?
aTarom (2026-02-27 15:43:17+00:00): reverted at changeset 179137241, https://t.me/osmcat/71884, no user response
Geo-Tobi (2026-02-28 06:07:11+00:00): Hast du einen tracktype hierzu?
Fraxi (2026-02-27 12:04:55+00:00): Извинявай за въпроса! Ти видя ли някъде наистина да пише, че там е №1 на бул. Овча купел? Аз не се сещам да съм забелязвал досега. А по принцип от другата страна на булеварда са нечетните номера. Виж сградите в СЗ посока и бележка https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5172813
Странно е.
Fraxi (2026-02-27 12:06:34+00:00): Да не е №2? 
За тази сграда - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117065730, която е от същата страна на дюнерите, но по-нагоре, съм виждал №2А. Май на рекламен надпис зад автомивката.
Boyan Alexiev (2026-03-09 08:44:34+00:00): Здравей! Сега чак обърнах внимание на коментара ти. Адреса го видях на касовата бележка от Аладина. Няма табелка, но доста често адреса на регистрация на фирмата отговаря на действителния и за това го въведох.

Ако смяташ че е фиктивен предлагам да го изтрием, докато не се появи по-достоверен източник.
Boyan Alexiev (2026-03-09 08:48:37+00:00): Премахнато:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179569053
Fraxi (2026-03-09 09:32:10+00:00): Не знам какво да ти кажа... И в сайта, и във фейсбук страницата на автогарата е подаден адрес с номер 1. А ако видиш сайта и на бившия технникум от другата страна, и там е номер 1. Няма логика. Това сигурно е грешка на някакво общинско/държавно ниво... По-добре така без адрес да бъде...
tjum (2026-04-07 07:13:34+00:00): Hallo,

mir ist eben aufgefallen, dass du einige Wege auf der mir bestens bekannten Oberensinger Höhe zu residential umgetaggt hast. Das finde ich grob unpassend, da es sich hier weder um öffentliche Straßen noch um ein Wohngebiet handelt.

Die Wege sind eindeutig Feldwege, die lediglich teilweise für die Zufahrt zu den Höfen freigegeben sind. Selbst wenn man sie als Straßen ansieht, wäre residential nicht korrekt.

Allenfalls könnte man darüber diskutieren, den unteren Weg bis zum Parkplatz der Sammlung Domnick als highway=unclassified zu taggen. Da müsste ich nochmal schauen, welches Schild genau an der Abzweigung der Stuttgarter Straße steht.

Auch name=Oberensinger Höhe ist hier zumindest diskutabel. Die Wege heißen NICHT so. Die Häuser haben zwar Adressen "Oberensinger Höhe", das ist aber das Gebiet - eine Straße diesen Namens gibt es nicht. 

Warst du vor Ort und hast dir die Schilder genau angeschaut?
literan (2026-02-28 10:00:51+00:00): не понимаю, зачем вы здания нарисовали такой формы. Исправил на корректную.
TinPetreković (2026-02-27 12:14:43+00:00): The node that was accidentally created has been removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179128728
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-27 12:17:09+00:00): Please stop adding new data and respond to the changeset comments. 

Thank you.
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-27 12:18:06+00:00): Can you explain what you're trying to accomplish here?
aTarom (2026-02-27 15:43:04+00:00): reverted at changeset 179137241, https://t.me/osmcat/71884, no user response
Carlos404 (2026-02-27 12:15:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179128743
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-27 12:17:23+00:00): Please stop adding new data and respond to the changeset comments. 

Thank you.
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-27 12:18:02+00:00): Can you explain what you're trying to accomplish here?
aTarom (2026-02-27 15:42:55+00:00): reverted at changeset 179137241, https://t.me/osmcat/71884, no user response
AndyB_66 (2026-02-27 14:14:42+00:00): To nie jest właściwy opis zestawu zmian - patrz tu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-27 12:23:33+00:00): Please stop!
aTarom (2026-02-27 15:42:34+00:00): reverted at changeset 179137241, https://t.me/osmcat/71884, no user response
NeisBot (2026-02-27 12:30:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13605350089 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Real estate office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-07 17:33:13+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179502828
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
eggie (2026-02-27 13:20:52+00:00): Hoi.. community_centre	buurthuis
is geen valide tag.
Alle waardes zijn in UK English.
Zie wiki.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2026-02-27 13:26:07+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:community_centre
eggie (2026-02-27 14:07:54+00:00): aangepast naar community_centre= social_centre..

Je moet zelf maar even kijken of de vlag de lading dekt.
MVG
eggie
ArLan67 (2026-02-27 18:45:25+00:00): Helemaal prima. Dank voor de feedback! Goed weekend!
aTarom (2026-02-27 15:42:11+00:00): reverted at changeset 179137241, https://t.me/osmcat/71884, no user response
SekeRob (2026-02-27 12:34:54+00:00): Just 1 new roundabout used by 7 routes like the SS16, and long distance flixbuses causing the perverted BBox size. Sorry.
aTarom (2026-02-27 15:42:03+00:00): reverted at changeset 179137241, https://t.me/osmcat/71884, no user response
aTarom (2026-02-27 15:41:55+00:00): reverted at changeset 179137241, https://t.me/osmcat/71884, no user response
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 04:40:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179129670
NeisBot (2026-02-27 12:42:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13605403143 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Event venue"

#MapWithoutSpam
jbmktg (2026-02-27 12:52:49+00:00): Oh, sorry, I didn't intend to. How can I change it? Is this going to be rejected and not be listed?
Timmy_Tesseract (2026-02-28 06:33:05+00:00): Good afternoon. The point-of-interest that you added is already uploaded to OpenStreetMap. It doesn't need approval but other mappers can make changes and add more details.

I removed the promotional description and moved some of the information to start_date and contact:youtube. I also changed the category from amenity=events_venue to office=company as this seems to be more fitting and made some other minor tagging improvements.

Please kindly double-check if everything looks right and feel free to add more details or update data in the future.

Thanks for contribtuting to OSM!
Timmy_Tesseract (2026-02-28 06:33:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13605403143
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-28 07:02:49+00:00): Thanks @Timmy_Tesseract

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179158815
Carlos404 (2026-02-27 12:42:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179129726#map=19/6.392602/2.397575
Carlos404 (2026-02-27 12:48:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179129997
Carlos404 (2026-02-27 12:50:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179130035
Bartek444 (2026-03-31 18:56:10+00:00): sygnalizacja wybudowana, ale jeszcze nie działa, czyli błędnie zostało wprowadzone
Mevess (2026-02-27 17:25:18+00:00): revert dans 179141654
mueschel (2026-03-05 18:24:17+00:00): Hi,
ich nehme mal du meinst statt "pluxxi" "pluxee", oder?
m_fuhrmann (2026-03-05 19:14:49+00:00): Hi,

das ist aber interessant. Denn als "pluxxi" wurde es mir mitgeteilt. Und das von jemandem aus der Tegut Zentrale. Ich ging daher nicht davon aus, dass es falsch sein könnte 🙈
Ich ändere es zeitnah ab. Habe nur wenige Tegut Märkte damit getagged.

Danke für den Hinweis 👍
m_fuhrmann (2026-03-05 19:17:20+00:00): Sodexo hieß es früher wurde mir gesagt. Daher muss es Pluxee sein. Es finden sich Artikel im Netz zur Umbenennung.
m_fuhrmann (2026-03-08 15:58:44+00:00): Ok. ich sehe gerade, dass du das schon behoben hast. Vielen Dank!
osmviborg (2026-02-27 13:51:34+00:00): Helt forkert. Det her er ikke 'Divided highways'. På steder hvor vognbanerne ikke er fysisk adskilt, skal der ikke tegnes separate veje. Striber på vejen & krydningsheller tæller ikke. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Divided_highways
olcastle (2026-02-27 14:09:05+00:00): Det var jeg ikke klar over. Det beklager jeg. Jeg går i gang med at gøre det om med det samme.
osmviborg (2026-02-27 14:11:35+00:00): Rolig nu. Jeg kan tilbageføre det i et hug, hvis du vil?
olcastle (2026-02-27 14:13:06+00:00): Meget gerne :D
osmviborg (2026-02-27 14:15:22+00:00): Done.
I-76 (2026-02-27 14:09:20+00:00): I think the problem here is that Lewis J. Smith Park, which encompasses the pool and roller hockey, is absorbed into McMoran park currently. This may be on the official map as such, but I figure the former should be recognized as an area. The borders here I am unsure about, but I'll check my official 2020 LM map later today.
Mevess (2026-02-27 17:39:45+00:00): J'ai enlever le name=* mais j'ai laissé le reste
revert partiel dans 179142252
4004 (2026-03-01 22:02:09+00:00): спасибо за правку. с виду там будто не 3 этажа?
Mevess (2026-02-27 17:05:37+00:00): Bonjour, bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap !
Merci pour votre contribution.
J'ai enlevé le nom sur la maison car il s'agit pas du nom du bâtiment en plus d'être une information privée.
Vous pouvez vous faire une carte personnalisée en utilisant Umap ou Framacarte, où vous pourrez ajouter les noms que vous voulez sur la carte. Voir le wiki pour plus d'infos : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:name
revert partiel dans 179140709
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179131226
aTarom (2026-02-27 15:41:37+00:00): reverted at changeset 179137241, https://t.me/osmcat/71884, no user response
gscholz (2026-03-11 08:24:55+00:00): Hi David,
this changeset has damaged several boundary relations e.g. "Caen-6", "Caen-8" and "Deuxième circonscription du Calvados":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-0.34374&lat=49.17824&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ring_not_closed%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
David Crochet (2026-03-11 08:57:27+00:00): Corrigé, merci de la surveillance, il y avait 3 autres relations de cassées
gscholz (2026-03-11 12:34:57+00:00): Thanks for your quick response.
Guido
eggie (2026-02-27 15:33:06+00:00): Dag Rob,

Lijkt me allemaal correct zo als het voor alles wat wielen heeft geldt. 

MVG
eggie
Rob Hooft (2026-02-27 16:01:28+00:00): Het geldt zelfs voor voetgangers....
eggie (2026-02-27 16:04:58+00:00): Oke.. maar dan anders formuleren lijkt mij.
..access:conditional=
Rob Hooft (2026-02-27 16:51:30+00:00): Too many options ;-)
4004 (2026-03-01 22:03:51+00:00): так Декантер или Вайлдберис?
4004 (2026-03-01 22:04:35+00:00): Декантер там уже есть, так что видимо второе, поправил
NeisBot (2026-02-27 13:24:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/48946165 v3 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/48628811 v8 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/617559610 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179131455
NeisReview (2026-03-07 17:33:14+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179250310
I-76 (2026-02-27 13:24:54+00:00): Worked but no conflation
Mevess (2026-02-27 16:52:28+00:00): Bonjour, bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap et merci pour votre contribution. J'ai enlevé les attributs avec le nom car ces objets n'en possèdent pas.
Vous pouvez vous faire une carte personnalisée en utilisant Umap ou Framacarte
Voir le wiki pour plus d'infos : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179131470
Mevess (2026-02-27 17:35:54+00:00): revert partiel dans 179142125
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179131472
Mevess (2026-02-27 17:32:07+00:00): Bonjour, si ce bâtiment a bel et bien brûlé, vous pouvez ajouter le tag destroyed:building au lieu de building
revert dans 179141870
Trail_Caretaker (2026-04-02 19:06:50+00:00): Nice Job.