piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pesec (2024-05-02 12:00:58+00:00): Добрый день.
На каком основании сделаны данные правки.
Оба участка дороги находятся в пределах населенного пункта, обозначенного дорожным знаком. Иных знаков там нет.
SomeoneElse (2024-05-01 10:30:09+00:00): Thanks!
mcliquid (2024-04-30 09:21:35+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
eggie (2024-04-30 10:12:25+00:00): Welkom bij OSM..
Beter geen persoonlijke info toevoegen aan een object. Of staat hier op het huis aangegeven Huize Ross? En op de schuur ook?
Zoniet beter de naam verwijderen
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2024-04-30 10:43:41+00:00): Voorlopig naam van woning en schuur verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
Heinz_V (2024-04-30 09:12:46+00:00): The water wells do not form a circle in most cases. So mapping 19 point circles is overkill. I think a simple node is sufficient.
bxl-forever (2024-05-02 10:15:16+00:00): Bonjour,

OK pour le changement.

Pour éviter les confusions, c’est toujours une bonne pratique de fournir une source vérifiable.  Car quand une première contribution change un nom de rue, nous savons que dans 95 % des cas c'est pour vandaliser.  Pour ici, j’ai trouvé la source sur le site de Gemeinde Bütgenbach et c’est OK, même si la décision ne précise pas à quelle date le changement est effectif.  Nous adaptons aussi les adresses des bâtiments, qui changent également.
miluethi (2024-04-30 12:21:09+00:00): Athira,

Please square out all buildings and size the shape according to satellite imagery. Your shapes are too big.

Squaring is easy: draw a building shape and press the "Q" key. That's it.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
unni-geo (2024-05-07 13:59:08+00:00): 

FYI:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Mappe_keine_vor%C3%BCbergehenden_Ereignisse_und_Objekte_tempor%C3%A4rer_Natur%E2%86%99

Stattdessen, siehe auch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:UMap
unni-geo (2024-05-07 14:00:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150695883

https://handball-wtv.de/index.php/ems-cup
wolfbert (2025-06-06 10:20:19+00:00): Bei diesen Bänken ist im material-Tag eine URL...
Stefan_89 (2025-06-06 17:01:50+00:00): Danke für die Info. Da ist mir irgendwie ein Fehler passiert. Werde das demnächst anpassen.
wolfbert (2025-06-14 10:43:14+00:00): Danke!
Spush (2024-04-30 09:30:46+00:00): Szekszárd frissítések '24.04.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-30 09:41:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8201934155
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235242526

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Piotr Strębski (2024-05-07 07:40:28+00:00): poprawione, dzięki!
ToniE (2024-04-30 09:55:07+00:00): Servus Richard,

geo-d und ich sind dort vor 2 1/2 Wochen lang geradelt, da war die Brückenbaustelle noch vorhanden.

Die GTFS-Daten des MVV sagen allerdings, dass hier seit 22.04. wieder 227er Busse lang fahren

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/gtfs/DE/single-trip.php?feed=DE-BY-MVV&release_date=&trip_id=74.T0.19-227-s24-3.3.R

Merkwürdig!

Aber Mitte Mai (?) zum großen Fest soll's wohl alles fertig sein, auch der Kirchplatz.

Gruß
Toni
landini (2024-04-30 17:42:39+00:00): Hallo,
die Brücke ist wieder befahrbar! Nur nutzt das dem Bus nichts, weil der Kirchplatz nach wie vor Baustelle ist.
Und ohne Kirchplatz kommt der Bus nicht in die Hahilinga Strasse. Da muss man also noch bis Mitte Mai warten.
landini (2024-04-30 17:50:49+00:00): kleiner Nachtrag
Unter https://m.mvv-muenchen.de/mvvMobile5/de/?name_dm=de:09184:2444&qr=1&sID=0#departures kann man sich die Abfahrten an der Haltestelle "Kybergstraße" anzeigen lassen und dort wird als Fahrweg beim Bus 227 Richtung Furth 
19:59 Oberhaching, Kybergstraße
20:00 Oberhaching, Lanzenhaarer Str.
20:03 Furth, Auf der Wies
20:05 Furth

angezeigt.
Vonter (2024-04-30 10:43:21+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Congrats on your first contributions to OpenStreetMap! If you’re interested in connecting with other mappers, do consider joining the regional OSM groups:

OSM Bengaluru

Telegram: https://telegram.me/OSM_BLR

Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#OSM_BLR:matrix.org

OSM India

Telegram: https://telegram.me/OSMIndia

Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#osm-in-general:matrix.org

Happy Mapping!
mcliquid (2024-04-30 17:34:35+00:00): Hi, ist das voltage=0 korrekt? Also dauerhaft Spannungslose? Danke dir!
_klaas_ (2024-04-30 19:18:28+00:00): Ja, die 220 kV Leitung in Richtung Österreich ist mit der 220 kV Leitung in Richtung Schweiz etwas südlich vom UW Herbertingen verbunden. Das letzte Stück ist spannungslos und am Portal geerdet
tekim (2024-05-02 23:28:09+00:00): Hello, Thanks for your edit to the map.  I see you cited "google streets" as the source for your edits.  I assume you mean "Google Street View" or "Google Maps."  Unfortunately, when editing OpenStreetMap we are not allowed to use Google Maps, Google Street View, Google Earth, or any imagery from Google Maps due to Google's terms of use.
tekim (2024-05-02 23:28:33+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150814835
mikimapbuilder (2024-04-30 11:23:47+00:00): It is not clear what this building represents
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 05:48:52+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164841054
skorasaurus (2024-05-01 18:23:30+00:00): hi, 

thanks for your mapping of maple heights; it well detailed. 

Although bing is of decent quality, I would recommend imagery provided by Cuyahoga County ; you can add it to josm with wmts:https://gis.cuyahogacounty.us/server/rest/services/IMAGERY/2023_Spring_Ortho/MapServer/WMTS     Secondly, I haven't investigated deeply, but the amenity=social_facility for loving hearts day care is not appropriate; based on this report - http://childcaresearch.ohio.gov/pdf/000000300129_2022-09-07_COMPLAINT.pdf - it is a childcare facility (in America, many parents work long periods of time, and send their children to Childcare also known as 'day care' facilities when they're under 5 years of age or if it is the summer and they are school age - http://childcaresearch.ohio.gov/pdf/000000300129_2022-09-07_COMPLAINT.pdf
skorasaurus (2024-05-01 18:24:33+00:00): as a local person, we would use amenity=childcare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dchildcare
eggie (2024-04-30 10:47:24+00:00): Beste FN

In dit geval stond het pad al op access = private   Hwet hoeft zeker niet verwijderd te worden van de kaart. Ik draai je edits even terug.
Liep hier een wandelroute overheen en hoe loopt die dan nu?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-04-30 10:48:24+00:00): reverted by changeset #150701052
GinaroZ (2024-04-30 14:10:35+00:00): I think access=customers would be better for the access here?  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1213263474
Same with the other visitors values you've added in the UK as customers is used 1000x more...
andrashann (2024-05-22 21:58:29+00:00): Szia! Ilyen esetben inkább highway=tertiary, surface=dirt, smoothness=very_bad címkéket érdemes használni. A highway=tertiary nem az út minőségét vagy milyenségét, hanem kategóriáját írja le, a másik két címkéből kéne az útvonaltervezőnek kiszámolnia, hogy nem érdemes erre küldeni autókat.
eggie (2024-04-30 10:51:51+00:00): reverted by changeset #150701129

Je zou het noordelijke pad wel kunnen inkorten. 
Het noordelijke pad heb ik ingekort. 
Svp geen paden verwijderen als ze in werkelijkheid bestaan.  
access=private zorgt ervoor dat het niet routeert.
MVG
eggie
mikimapbuilder (2024-04-30 11:24:31+00:00): Building was not squared angled
eggie (2024-04-30 10:53:24+00:00): Dag FN  Niet name= gebruiken om iets te beschrijven.
De juiste tag voor een caravan zie je hier.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dstatic_caravan
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-04-30 10:54:37+00:00): Aangepast....  We taggen dus niet name=  voor bv bankje huis, boom, caravan.

MVG
eggie
ZvigorAmutoc (2024-04-30 10:21:55+00:00): Нужно уточнение по положению, размеру и тэгам; на момент наблюдения (28.04.24) хождение по области требует средств передвижения с крайне высокой проходимостью или рыбатских сапогов
eggie (2024-04-30 10:56:44+00:00): Beste Hier kun je wijzigingen doorgeven aan het Kadaster.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Schatkuilsestraat+2&objectId=0252200000022945&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=182917.356&geometry.y=421316.95499999996&zoomlevel=15

Dan komt de juiste vorm vanzelf goed in OSM.
MVG
eggie
aceman444 (2025-05-19 06:57:49+00:00): HI, thanks for the addition. The clinic in Bratislava surely isn't located in the middle of the street. Also the opening hours of Mo-Sa 00:00-00:00 seem to be wrong, it means the clinic is never open.
miluethi (2024-04-30 12:01:58+00:00): Mahendrasinh,

Please draw one shape for each building, especially if they are not connected.
I delete your shape.

Squaring is easy: draw a building shape and press the "Q" key. That's it.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
mckale (2025-03-03 06:48:15+00:00): badly marked position of rocks
Mirecnet (2025-03-03 08:57:29+00:00): I've never been there. It is marked according to the mountain climbing guide.

https://www.climb.sk/sector/show/761

https://bieladolinka.szm.com/Sprievodca.html

https://www.visitliptov.sk/trasa/liptovsky-jan-biela-dolinka-lezenie-na-liptove/
miluethi (2024-05-08 17:16:16+00:00): Hi Prakshi_25,

I deleted some of your new building shapes in OSM for the following reason:

1) The shapes are too big and don't match the satellite imagery. Please narrow down your shapes to match the satellite imagery.

2) It's a little less important, but whenever possible try to have right angled buildings. 
It's easy, you press the "Q" when you select a building frame and it will square out the shape.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
gabro00 (2024-06-04 09:29:17+00:00): Szia!
Ebben a módosításban nagyon elcsúszott néhány, pontosan felrajzolt út. A FÖMI légifelvételek újra elérhetők, ha lehet, azt használd referenciaként a rajzoláshoz.
mikimapbuilder (2024-04-30 11:30:06+00:00): U-turn has different tagging, that is why it was removed
opendcc (2024-04-30 17:49:38+00:00): Bin da heute wieder mal durch (wie schon sehr oft) als Radpendler durchgefahren: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4223081

Vor 2020 war die Kreuzung deutlich gefährlicher für den Geradeausverkehr.
MunichWays (2024-06-12 06:27:37+00:00): Lieber opendcc,
sorry für die späte Antwort, OSM Mails waren im Spam gelandet.
Die Experten vom ADFC sehen das anders, siehe https://muenchen.adfc.de/pressemitteilung/toedlicher-unfall-mit-radfahrerin-adfc-muenchen-fordert-ad-hoc-massnahme
"Radfahrstreifen nicht regelkonform angelegt"
opendcc (2024-06-12 07:06:11+00:00): Man kann über die aktuelle Ausführung geteilter Meinung sein (insbesondere wann und wie der Radweg da in die Mittellage geführt wird), aber vor dem Umbau war das ein Drama. Es gibt hier viele Kfz-Rechtsabbieger, die massiv in den geradeaus fahrenden Radverkehr reindrängelten. Separate Ampelphasen würden den Durchsatz sowohl für Kfz als auch für Radler beschränken. Problematisch besonders auch die Tankstellenausfahrt. Fürs Tagging hier: wenn die Situation objektiv auswertbar ist (hier der Fall mit den lane-settings), dann ist eine subjektive Beurteilung nicht erwünscht - siehe wiki.
MunichWays (2024-06-19 06:37:53+00:00): auf welche Wiki-Seite beziehst du dich?
Ich denke gerade hier ist class:bicycle=-2 sehr sinnvoll, weil die Diskussionen hier und bei der Stadtverwaltung klar zeigen, dass die subjektive Sicherheit nicht aus den bestehenden Tags hervorgehen. Mal abgesehen davon, dass die arme totgefahrene Frau die objektive Sicherheit negativ in der Unfallstatistik belegt.
opendcc (2024-06-19 07:18:49+00:00): Sieh Dir das Beispiel auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:class:bicycle an: dort wird explizit erwähnt, dass class:bicycle eben recht subjectiv gesehen wird und nur ergänzend zu objektiven Kriterien (wie lane, surface, ...) verwendet wird:  "... Wir brauchen jedoch nicht zusätzlich class:bicycle=-2 hinzuzufügen, weil oneway=yes lanes=2 highway=primary schon klar machen, dass ..."
opendcc (2024-06-19 07:54:02+00:00): Zur Diskussion mit Stadtverwaltung: in meinen Augen könnte eine frühere Verschwenkung des Radweges zur Fahrbahn (unter Entfall der Parkplätze) was bringen (ab Marianne-Plehn-Str), ebenso eine baulich fühlbare Bremse (z.B. abgesenkter Randstein) für Autofahrer, welche nach rechts queren wollen.
MunichWays (2024-06-21 10:22:33+00:00): Ja, das Bild und die Beschreibung im Wiki zu class:bicycle=-1 passt sehr gut.
MunichWays (2024-06-21 10:24:34+00:00): Zur Diskussion mit Stadtverwaltung. Gute Vorschläge. zusätzlich denke ich, dass die Tankstelle auch mit 2 statt 3 Ein-/Ausfahrten gut klar käme. Dann könnte die gefährlichste 1. auf der Kreilerstraße wegfallen.
opendcc (2024-06-21 12:31:31+00:00): Siehe hierzu z.B. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqcVCYt9zZE 7:40 (Aber vor dem Umbau wars genauso, nur halt eine Spur weiter rechts). So aus meiner Sicht: ich würde ja lieber durch den Wald via Solalinden/Grasbrunn fahren, aber besonders zw. Trudering und Solalinden ist der Wegzustand übelst.
miluethi (2024-07-21 12:28:45+00:00): Hi Sandip,
Please square out your new building shapes in OSM. In the iD editor it's the "Q" key.
The tag building=house is not ideal. It's generally used for residential buildings in urban neighborhoods. The generic "building=yes" or building=farm is better.
Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
miluethi (2024-04-30 23:41:11+00:00): Angeltet,

Please square out building shapes before uploading them. Simply select the building shape and press the "Q" key.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
miluethi (2024-04-30 23:43:56+00:00): Hi Angeltet,

I also just realized that your building shapes are often too big.
Please narrow them down to match the satellite imagery exactly.

Thanks.
kikihadwiyanti (2024-05-24 12:02:15+00:00): Great work on your mapping. Keep it up, cheers!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150702581
trial (2025-11-19 19:11:22+00:00): Bonjour, a priori le wikidata de La Galerie n'est pas bon. Et tant qu'à faire : https://www.la-galerie.com/lanester/plan-centre
Yves Rocher par exemple est mal placé https://www.la-galerie.com/lanester/boutiques/yves-rocher-yves-rocher-geant-lanester
sheldonelectric (2025-11-19 21:20:17+00:00): bien vu, en changeant le "geant casino" en "galerie" j'avais oublie d'effacer le wikidata. quant a yves rocher, j'y ai pas touche, stp verifier sur place.
trial (2025-11-19 22:46:11+00:00): J'avais bien compris l'origine de l'erreur, tu es bien le premier^^.
Je fais confiance à La Galerie pour savoir quel emplacement a été loué à Yves Rocher. Comme c'est eux qui le disent directement et publiquement.
SekeRob (2024-04-30 11:26:17+00:00): Are these names 'Bosco di Fusignano' real or just descriptive?
miluethi (2024-04-30 12:25:08+00:00): Aswini,

Please square out all buildings and size the shape according to satellite imagery. 

Squaring is easy: draw a building shape and press the "Q" key. That's it.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
Hufkratzer (2024-04-30 21:35:46+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1278472267 is not a riding centre, it is just a riding arena. Compare
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1278219826
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
larchmap (2024-05-01 15:21:24+00:00): Good note - have changed now. Thanks
eggie (2024-04-30 14:25:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  De voorgaande aanpassing was 27-4-24
Met de note 	deze verbinding bestaat niet meer, maar is nog op de kaart aanwezig om routering op basis van verouderd kaartmateriaal na 2 september mogelijk te maken
Even geen idee wat de consequensties zijn van je aanpassing.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-04-30 16:15:28+00:00): Zie forum discussie hoe om te gaan met de werkzaamheden  in Groningen Stad.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/provincie-van-de-maand-groningen/112515
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-04-30 19:20:30+00:00): Wanneer je een paar keer ctrl-f5 toetst zie je dat de situatie al weer is aangepast.
Waar het nog niet open is zullen wel conditional tags zijn toegevoegd op datum.
Dit zijn van die lastige afwegingen.
Mapse..
eggie
Leo Slager (2024-04-30 21:58:12+00:00): Alle verbroken routerelaties zijn weer hersteld.
prettyapathetic (2024-05-02 15:38:26+00:00): Would this be better represented as showing the bridge closed & under construction? The bridge is getting replaced so it will physically exist in one way or another for the majority of construction
hlskippy (2024-05-02 15:50:00+00:00): I think either could be an appropriate way to communicate that there is not a bridge here for any use for the duration of the construction
prettyapathetic (2024-05-02 17:36:36+00:00): I would like to tag the bridge as highway = construction and change each access = no if that's ok - it would appear like the block of Salem Ave that is closed for construction downtown. This would also preserve the relations of the roadway, like US 221 and bikeways relations
hlskippy (2024-05-02 17:58:04+00:00): Absolutely! Thanks for keeping maps up-to-date and educating OSM users
tekim (2024-05-01 20:09:38+00:00): reverting a changeset that contains fake edits - no evidence of a bus station here

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150767257
SJoao (2024-05-13 22:04:03+00:00): There's a newly built ferry station integrated with a bus platform,
Since its very new its not on the public sat imagery.
Some info at
https://www.sptrans.com.br/aquatico-sp
Related searches should show this construction.
Ferry line relations
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17590872
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17590871
TrickyFoxy (2024-05-01 20:30:05+00:00): It seems something went wrong

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8631777217/history
mikimapbuilder (2024-04-30 11:57:45+00:00): From satelite imagery this seems like a pool not a building
Lelio Alves (2024-05-30 15:40:53+00:00): Good Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150704029
miluethi (2024-04-30 12:04:11+00:00): Hi Caroline,

Please square out all buildings and size the shape according to satellite imagery. 

Squaring is easy: draw a building shape and press the "Q" key. That's it.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
miluethi (2024-05-01 20:30:57+00:00): Hi Caroline,

Please square out all buildings and size the shape according to satellite imagery.

Squaring is easy: draw a building shape and press the "Q" key. That's it.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
mikimapbuilder (2024-04-30 12:08:41+00:00): Corrected building angles
Lelio Alves (2024-05-30 15:40:28+00:00): Good Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150704420
InsertUser (2024-10-28 23:48:49+00:00): Hello, 
There is new Bing and Esri imagery of this marina now so I have tried to update it. If you have time it would be great if you could have a look to see if my updates are the way you remember it. 
www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158477644
https://osmcha.org/changesets/158477644
ChromeLotus (2024-05-01 18:20:58+00:00): Hello Bakullaev! I hope you're doing well. I wanted to follow up on a message I sent about a month ago regarding the highway classification changes in Шұбарсу village (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149321610). 

I want to reiterate that these modifications are not consistent with how trunk classification is recognized in Kazakhstan, for the reasons I previously mentioned.
These roads primarily serve local traffic (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways) and road importance should be considered when assigning the trunk classification within the road hierarchy (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrunk).

I've noticed you've been overwriting recent classifications again without responding to the message about your modifications. In the Changeset Discussions section on the OSM wiki, it's emphasized how important it is to communicate with community members for effective collaboration (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset). I would appreciate working together with you to resolve this matter in line with OSM Community guidelines, so we can continue building an accurate map.

Best,
ChromeLotus

Автоматический перевод:

Сәлем Бакуллаев! Жақсы жүрсің деп үміттенемін. Мен бір ай бұрын Шұбарсу ауылындағы тас жол классификациясының өзгеруіне байланысты жолдаған хабарламамды қадағалағым келді (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149321610).

Қайталап айтқым келеді, бұл өзгертулер мен жоғарыда айтқан себептерге байланысты магистральдық классификация Қазақстанда қалай танылатынына сәйкес келмейді.
Бұл жолдар негізінен жергілікті көлік қозғалысына қызмет етеді (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways) және жол иерархиясында магистральдық классификацияны тағайындау кезінде жол маңыздылығын ескеру қажет (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag). :highway%3Dtrunk).

Өзгерістеріңіз туралы хабарға жауап бермей, соңғы жіктеулерді қайта жазып жатқаныңызды байқадым. OSM викиіндегі Changeset Discussions бөлімінде тиімді ынтымақтастық үшін қауымдастық мүшелерімен байланысудың қаншалықты маңызды екендігі атап өтілген (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset). Осы мәселені OSM қауымдастығы нұсқауларына сәйкес шешу үшін сізбен бірге жұмыс істегеніңізге ризамын, осылайша біз дәл картаны құруды жалғастыра аламыз.

Ең жақсы,
ChromeLotus
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-12 05:19:18+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150704779
Flamen_Sru (2024-05-14 12:33:54+00:00): Hi Aarogya Pandey 
Thank you and happy mapping:)
urbalazs (2024-05-01 06:55:27+00:00): Miért változtattad meg az utak típusát „unclassified” értékre? Településeken belül ezt a típust nem használjuk. Az utakat a helyi építési szabályzat alapján soroljuk be. Lásd: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/F%C5%91%C3%BAt
Fra00 (2024-04-30 12:33:21+00:00): Commento alla modifica errato. Quello giusto: in tutta Italia gli abitanti nel punto indicante il nome del comune si riferiscono all'intero territorio comunale. Nessun senso che questa sia l'unica eccezione solo perché unico comune non capoluogo di provincia con più di 100k abitanti.
ivanbranco (2024-04-30 18:39:38+00:00): La population di questo nodo era stata modificata da un utente pluri-bloccato, vedi anche: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135844880
mikimapbuilder (2024-04-30 12:35:48+00:00): Modified building corners
kikihadwiyanti (2024-05-24 12:01:33+00:00): Great work on your mapping. Keep it up the cheers!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150706133
kikihadwiyanti (2024-05-24 11:59:23+00:00): Great work on your changeset. Keep up the mapping, cheers!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150706314
fortera_au (2024-04-30 13:35:33+00:00): Hi, is there a reason why you've removed tags for "testing"?
mikimapbuilder (2024-04-30 12:58:50+00:00): Building was going over a yard, that is the reason why it was modified
SCNC (2024-06-18 08:47:33+00:00): Kunt u svp toelichting op beperkingen access=no geven voor poortdreef, olympiadreef etc, deze zijn namelijk niet afgesloten