piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SekeRob repair (2026-05-06 10:14:54+00:00): Hi,

Just corrected your route relation as you had the relation as a member rather than the path. Think it's now OK. See
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20618434
ZeLonewolf (2026-05-10 12:31:09+00:00): Boundary for Tri Pond should exist in the state GIS layer.  Will see if I can locate it.
ogerpon (2026-05-14 06:24:04+00:00): Thanks for the help!
eggie (2026-05-03 11:59:12+00:00): Lijkt me oke...  Was geen adresnode.
MVG
eggie
DetectiveConan (2026-05-03 14:38:27+00:00): Do not apply China's place tags to Myanmar.
不要把中国的地点标签应用在缅甸。
3D打印 (2026-05-03 15:01:03+00:00): OK？，但为什么缅甸那边县不能用城市呢？
DetectiveConan (2026-05-03 15:55:39+00:00): County is a sort of boundaries, and I don't think counties has anything to do with cities or towns. Why would a county be called a city? In Myanmar, city and town are the same word. Myanmar only has three officially recognized cities, but we also mark capitals and major towns in states and regions as cities.

县是一种行政边界，我认为县与城市或城镇没有任何关系。为什么县会被称为城市呢？在缅甸，城市和城镇是同一个词。缅甸只有三个官方认可的城市，但我们也将邦和地区的首府和主要城镇都标记为城市。
Gaung Tebono (2026-05-03 22:39:40+00:00): Mohon perhatiannya ya, kenapa saya sengaja ubah kelas jalan menjadi primary? Karena jalan tersebut memiliki tingkat urgensi/kepentingan yang tinggi, sehingga lebih cocok untuk diklasifikasikan sebagai highway=primary. Disini masalah urgensi itu berbicara mengenai tingkat kepadatan traffic/lalu lintas kendaraan nya bukan berarti harus provinsi dulu yang bertanggung jawab lalu dibuat tag highway=primary. Kesimpulan nya adalah tidak selalu jalan dengan tag highway primary tersebut merupakan jalan kewenangan provinsi, ini merujuk pada jalan yang ada diluar negeri itu, tanpa harus memandang siapa yang berhak memelihara jalan tersebut.

Salam 🙏🏻
f_husni (2026-05-04 05:01:43+00:00): Halo, untuk mas Al Cholis mungkin bisa sedikit cek-cek atau baca kelas-kelas jalan di wiki openstreemap https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Id:Jalan
eerib (2026-05-05 02:02:18+00:00): Hello mcclutch,

Thank you for your edit. Unfortunately it does not meet OpenStreetMap standards. Please refer to the following wiki page that focuses on deletions of trails but is applicable in this case.

osm.wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

What you, or the maintainers of the hut, may prefer to do is to setup a booking system and then detail that booking system using the description tag.

If you have further questions regarding the policies or outdoor mapping in general then I recommend starting a discussion thread on the OpenStreetMap Community Forum.

https://community.openstreetmap.org

Thank you, eerib
_uid0 (2026-05-03 12:58:17+00:00): L'utilisation de « leisure=stadium » semble excessive. Il s’agit ici d'un tout petit stade de football communale.
Grola (2026-05-04 06:37:22+00:00): Bonjour,
petit ou grand, un stade est un stade, non? D'autant plus que celui n'est pas si petit, puisqu'il comporte plusieurs terrains ou installations. Le recours à une surface d'ensemble ("stade") permet enfin de mettre en exergue une désignation d'ensemble, comme ici "plaine des sports". Bien cordialement.
_uid0 (2026-05-07 22:29:30+00:00): Selon le wiki, ce genre de stade de football est bien trop anecdotique pour être défini de la sorte. Aussi, vous avez englobé les autres installations sportives de la « Plaine des Sports » qui ne font pas partie intégrante du stade. La « Plaine des Sports » mériterait, effectivement, une surface d’ensemble mais ce « tag » est inapproprié.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-01 10:29:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24575695/history

why it would be tertiary?
GiovanniPen (2026-05-03 09:08:45+00:00): please comment your changeset before publishing
GilB (2026-07-10 14:44:27+00:00): Bonjour. J'ai corrigé les tags amenity et name sur le Bistro Kiwa, ainsi que d'autres tags. Ce type de tag ne supporte pas les valeurs multiples, et ça l'avait fait disparaitre de la carte.
Pour moi c'est plutot amenity=cafe compte tenu des heures d'ouverture. Quand il faut choisir, je mets restaurant quand c'est seulement ouvert le midi et le soir. 
Pour le nom j'ai ajouté le tag alt_name pour garder la mention Kiwa.
ika-chan! (2026-05-03 15:09:02+00:00): What is the source for the road junction layouts? The source you gave only specified whether the junction is level or grade-separated, without giving details.
gpserror (2026-05-18 13:28:30+00:00): There was a note about this https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5298126 - I'm unfortunately not in this area so I don't know what the locals call it, but I've never heard it called an island and thus this can be confusing.  What was the source of this designation?
Ktr101 (2026-05-19 12:45:10+00:00): I am going to resolve this, as I do see what they were referring to, and even if the name is wrong, Cape Cod is technically an island now, as we were taught as children in school there.
eggie (2026-05-03 09:54:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Dan lijkt me access=private voldoende. Je hoeft dan niet al die weggebruikers ook nog op private te zetten.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Jeroen (foXX) Mulder (2026-05-03 20:01:45+00:00): Dank voor de tip!
eggie (2026-05-03 09:58:46+00:00): Dag  Jroen. Wanneer dit alleen met toestemming van de eigenaar te betreden is dan gebruiken we access=permissive
Je track volgt geen logische route. Is daar wel een verbinding?
Deansluitende track loopt ook door een gebouw en een afzetting heen.
Graag reactie,
eggie
eggie (2026-05-03 10:02:12+00:00): Ik denk dat die wegdelen hier niet zo bestaan.
Ze lopen dwars door afscheidingen heen.
eggie (2026-05-03 11:50:21+00:00): Wellicht heb je hier iets aan
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.19480,5.129513,19/?datastrip=20260302_SVNEO-03&sensorname=SuperView-NEO
Jeroen (foXX) Mulder (2026-05-03 20:06:26+00:00): De verbinding was er al, ik heb alleen de acces aangepast omdat je vanaf de weg een druk transportbedrijf oploopt. Dit is (ook) eigen terrein dus. Wat wil je dat ik doe? Ik kan er niet op om het daadwerkelijk te checken. Als ik naar je satelietbeeld kijk, dan is alles bestraat en zou ik het weggetje (wat als onverhard staat gemeld) volledig weglaten.
eggie (2026-05-03 20:12:41+00:00): Ik heb het allemaal aangepast naar access=private. Ik denk dat je nog naar het 'oude' beeld kijk. Paar keer CTRL-F5
om je cache leeg te maken. 
Het zal hier niet routeren.. ook niet vanaf de Rading, want het is geen doorgaande weg meer. Immers access=private op het bedrijventerrein. 
We laten hoeft niet.. of er moet echt geen verbinding(meer) zijn. Die was er altijd wel in het verleden. 
Ik heb ook even met Obliek luchtfoto's gekeken van Slagboom&Peeters, maar die waren van 2021. 
Denk dat het zo wel aardig klopt. Het zal straks niet meer routeren.

Mapse,
eggie
Jeroen (foXX) Mulder (2026-05-03 20:40:10+00:00): Wederom dank voor je hulp!
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-03 12:12:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/895946253
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/895946455

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2026-05-03 11:47:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-03 12:12:43+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/781147930

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2026-05-03 12:22:22+00:00): Top :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182152049
eggie (2026-05-03 10:52:15+00:00): Dag Martienos..
In OSM begint een website met http.... 
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2026-05-03 11:57:28+00:00): aangepast naar https://yammiebypims.nl/
Yog Sot (2026-05-03 20:38:38+00:00): o lol, wywalili grubą kase na zabetonowanie brzegów, ale tak jak za komuni szło, to teraz w wolnym kraju wody polskie mają w doopie temat ;]
gurglypipe (2026-05-03 10:58:40+00:00): Hiya, what’s your source for this change? Bing Streetside shows a “private road no access” sign at the junction with the A591, which is consistent with the edit which originally added access=private (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51787582).

Why do you think it should not be tagged as access=private? That’s the kind of information which should go into your changeset comment (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments) :)

Thanks
olehz (2026-07-14 05:42:56+00:00): https://ais.ansp.kg/eaip/2026-06-11-AIRAC/html/eAIP/UC-AD-2.UCFB-en-GB.html#AD-2.UCFB

Why did you revert the changes?

UAFB is an outdated code. Previously, Kyrgyzstan's airports used the UA- prefix (a legacy of the Soviet bloc, shared with Kazakhstan and other Central Asian states).

UCFB is the current code. ICAO allocated Kyrgyzstan its own UC- prefix, and all Kyrgyz airports were recoded accordingly.

Other Kyrgyzstan airports changed in the same way.
Bat Wings (2026-07-14 09:37:05+00:00): Thanks for the feedback; that had caused some confusion for me as well. I had based it on an old source, so I'm incorporating the changes now—I'll take a look at the updates in this area. Thanks.
arjunaraoc (2026-05-18 23:53:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182153379
Antonino_Faro (2026-05-03 17:41:32+00:00): Ciao, grazie per i tuoi contributi.

Potrei sapere cosa intendi nel commento "non consigliata!!!" come descrizione del changeset?

Inoltre, puoi indicarmi la fonte che indica il percorso "salita infernale"?

Grazie in anticipo e buona domenica
Manlio bones (2026-05-05 17:04:10+00:00): Ciao.
Procediamo con ordine. Avevamo intenzione solo di dare un nome ad una dagala particolarissima, che credo non ne avesse. Quindi, avendo smarrito, durante l'escursione, il sentiero in andata, ed essendoci imbattuti in una salita su vecchie lave con pendenze del 50%, misurate, ho voluto solo fare un tentativo  di inserire in mappa una linea non gps, tracciata manualmente, che quanto prima avrei eliminato, e che ho scherzosamente chiamato infernale, e non consigliata. Ho superato le tue perplessità?
Antonino_Faro (2026-05-05 17:54:43+00:00): Ok, grazie mille della spiegazione.
Premetto scusandomi per la rimozione (sospettavo un vandalismo).

Per quanto riguarda i dati, il principio cardine di OpenStreetMap è la verificabilità.
I nomi devono essere quelli ufficiali o usati localmente da tempo; nomi 'creativi' o soggettivi (come "infernale") non possono essere inseriti perché la mappa viene usata anche dai servizi di emergenza e soccorso alpino, che hanno bisogno di riferimenti oggettivi.
Inoltre, i dati inseriti devono essere definitivi e non provvisori.

Se il sentiero esiste, è verificabile ed è percorribile meglio seguire questi tag:
highway=path
incline=50%
description=sentiero molto ripido(o come preferisci)

Trovi maggiori informazioni qui:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath

In merito ad altri changeset, li ho rimossi sempre per aver presunto un possibile vandalismo, alcuni edit mi sono sembrati troppo sospetti e non avendo trovata nessuna fonte le ho rimosse. Sempre se reputi che tutti gli elementi siano veritieri e hai anche modo di dimostrarmi la verificabilità ripristino tutti gli edit.

Grazie ancora per il contributo e per il chiarimento
Manlio bones (2026-05-06 16:15:16+00:00): Va bene, grazie per il chiarimento. Stop ai vandali ovviamente. 
Però io cammino su e giu per il vulcano ormai da 50 anni circa, e anche se conosco o scopro spesso emergenze non mappate, non intervengo cosi spesso su osm per farmi spazio o farmi conoscere. Nel merito, ribadisco tuttavia: se la dagala "selva oscura" non aveva un suo nome precedente, cosa osta dargliene uno? Il vecchio rifugio don bosco era dei Salesiani ed io ci ho passato tanti giorni e notti negli anni 70, prima dell'eruzione del 1983. Esiste un video dell'INGV che ritrae il seppellimento del rifugio ad opera della lava. La salita infernale era solo un tentativo di inserire un percorso, visto che altre volte non sono riuscito ad inserire tracce gps di sentieri perduti o dimenticati che osm non annovera, e che apparentemente non mi permette di fare (il limite di sicuro è il mio ). Essendo un vecchio speleologo, inoltre, ti garantisco che oggi c'è qualcuno che sta stravolgendo le nomenclature di Catasto Speleologico esistenti, utilizzando  discutibilissimi nomi propri o di parenti, senza curarsi affatto di rispettare chi, molto  prima di lui o loro, ha fatto un certosino lavoro di ricerca, mappatura e nomenclatura di grotte sull'Etna. Vuoi un esempio?  Che fine ha fatto la grotta Cutrona in valle del Bove? Grazie se avrai avuto la pazienza di leggermi fino in fondo.
Antonino_Faro (2026-05-08 13:14:40+00:00): Ciao, scusami se sono sparito ma in questi giorni sono stato strapieno :')

Per quanto riguarda la dagala, va benissimo aggiungerci un nome, ma il nome deve essere un nome ufficiale oppure un nome molto usato dalla gente del posto (ma in quel caso va in loc_name=* ).

Per le tracce: se sono ancora visibili ma impossibili da percorrere si può aggiungere il percorso come abandoned:highway=path , così da indicare che la traccia è ormai abbandonata e quindi viene sconsigliata dai programmi di navigazione.

Per le nomenclature del catasto Speleologico, capisco pienamente la tua frustrazione ma purtroppo su OSM in questi casi bisogna mettere sempre nel campo name=* i nomi che sono comunicati ufficialmente. In alternativa si possono inserire i nomi vecchi come old_name=* cosi da rendere identificabile comunque i nodi con tutto che ufficialmente ne hanno un altro.

Mi scuso ancora per aver presunto un vandalismo; è chiaro che il tuo intento è valorizzare il territorio. Provvedo a ripristinare i tuoi edit (correggendo magari i tag dove necessario come abbiamo discusso) nel corso della giornata.

Buon mapping!
Antonino_Faro (2026-05-08 13:19:51+00:00): P.S. Aggiungo che se le può interessare c'è un sotto-proggetto di OSM pensato per elementi storici chiamato https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ possono essere molto utili per quanto riguarda elementi storici non piu presenti nella mappa attuale (ad esempio, la circumetnea nella zona di Catania)

Se vuole una mano per aggiungere le tracce GPS mi puo contattare in privato andando nel mio profilo e selezionando "invia un messaggio"

Ancora buona giornata e buon mapping
Quasimodo (2026-05-06 09:40:26+00:00): Habe hier einen AED (Defibrillator) eingetragen. Er wird jedoch nicht mit dem entsprechenden Symbol angezeigt. Woran liegt es?
pacodoe (2026-05-03 11:41:27+00:00): Erreur concernant cette modification
arjunaraoc (2026-05-18 23:55:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182155141
joost schouppe (2026-05-26 11:53:05+00:00): I removed this one -  it was already mapped a twenty meters more to the north. You also pointed out "the top" of the turbine, but on aerial imagery, the "bottom" of things is in the correct location, the top is not. Same with building: trace the outline of where it reaches the ground, not the outline of the roof.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 11:01:12+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, possibly sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184131477

https://osm.org/changeset/184131477
mikita_paloika (2026-05-06 07:03:52+00:00): Hello @Oso08122010! I noticed some accidental geometry issues (dragged nodes) on the swimming pool in your previous edit. I have fixed those specific changes to restore the correct shape based on Bing aerial imagery. Please let me know if you have any questions!

Best Regards, 
Mikita
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182156028
marczoutendijk (2026-05-05 12:57:17+00:00): There is no Aiden Cafe at that spot. What is your source? Your own name?
Don't add data to OSM if its ot real!

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Aiden Kelly (2026-05-05 20:06:34+00:00): Yes there is that’s a new business I rent the location now it’s Aiden Cafe
marczoutendijk (2026-05-06 07:50:39+00:00): I see, and this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13770188901
AidenDollar.com is also yours?
Aiden Kelly (2026-05-06 10:34:33+00:00): Yes
eggie (2026-05-03 12:29:08+00:00): Hoi..
Maar ja.. wat stond nog niet in osm?
Probeer concreet aan te geven wat je hebt gedaan.
Mapse
De Ouwe Zeerover (2026-05-03 13:43:18+00:00): Okido is helder. Ik heb het bedrijf toegevoegd.
eggie (2026-05-03 13:53:30+00:00): Top!
GinaroZ (2026-05-14 12:05:12+00:00): better to be tagged as demolished:building :)
smsm1 (2026-05-14 21:42:24+00:00): Thanks for fixing. Sometimes hard to remember what tagging to use when out on the ground, or say on a moving bus mapping as I was in this case.
KingVik (2026-05-06 12:49:13+00:00): Dear Erick,
I hope you are doing well.
I’d like you to please double-check these edits, as they don’t appear to match any of the imagery sources mentioned. Kindly review them and either fix the issues or consider reverting the edits if necessary.
Thank you for your contributions, let’s continue working together to ensure we maintain high-quality edits.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182157180
Erick tamba (2026-05-06 13:24:40+00:00): Sure!, Thank you for checking in. Working on this changeset and others around this area, ASAP 

Erick
KingVik (2026-05-07 08:46:26+00:00): Thank you brother 
I appreciate that
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
KingVik (2026-05-06 13:31:22+00:00): Dear Erick,
I hope you are doing well.
I’d like you to please double-check these edits, as they don’t appear to match any of the imagery sources mentioned. Kindly review them and either fix the issues or consider reverting the edits if necessary.
Thank you for your contributions, let’s continue working together to ensure we maintain high-quality edits.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182157252
Marián Kyral (2026-05-03 18:05:29+00:00): Však tam bylo access=private.
Medvidas (2026-05-03 18:21:23+00:00): Chápu argument, nicméně běžní uživatelé map vidí na mapě ikonku hřiště či laviček (které tu nejsou) a jdou na návštěvu, skrze plot a soukromovou označenou branku. Status private/non private v mapě jim nic neříká. Děje se to několikrát do týdne a není příjemné to řešit, často vznikají konfliktní situace. Proč nejsou stejně zmapovány i ostatní SOUKROMÉ nemovitosti v oblasti? Je na pozemku u domu pískoviště => dětské koupaliště, je na pozemku bazén => ikona koupaliště?
Marián Kyral (2026-05-04 05:30:52+00:00): Tak snad to pomůže. Co to je za lidi? Nějací turisti? Větší soukromá hřiště a bazény se běžně mapují, často jsou součástí rekreačních areálů nebo bytových komplexů. Bohužel někteří lidi jsou úplně blbí a další zase drzí a ignorují jakékoli zákazy.
aldarosm (2026-05-03 12:38:03+00:00): Note 5108256
eggie (2026-05-03 13:39:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
A67-A67 (2026-05-03 22:48:42+00:00): Bedankt voor je toevoegingen. 

Hier gaat wel iets fout. In het telefoonnummer horen spaties tussen de landcode, het netnummer en het abonneennummer. In dit geval dus +31 475 491272. In deze wijziging haal je die spaties weg.

Ik heb het hersteld.
De Ouwe Zeerover (2026-05-04 10:53:16+00:00): Ik map pas sinds kort. Ik kende deze nog niet. ik zal het in de toekomst toepassen. Dank!
mcliquid (2026-05-03 18:25:41+00:00): Thanks! I missed the name *eyerolling-to-self*
bxl-forever_repair (2026-05-06 10:24:05+00:00): You are welcome. :-)
trigpoint (2026-05-03 14:10:26+00:00): So your solution is to add another fake crossing?

Pedestrians can cross the road wherever they like. Drawing decorative sidewalks just adds unnecessary complications to pedestrian routing. We do not have, or want oppressive jaywalking rules.

Cheers Phil
North14 (2026-05-04 10:38:29+00:00): Hi Phil, hope you are fine. 
Please rest assured that it is by no means my intention for my map additions to be repressive or patronizing in any way. Your so called "fake crossing" is called in OSM "informal crossing" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing%3Dinformal). It is an established commonly used feature for pedestrian crossings. 
When you talk about "unnecessary complication to pedestrian routing", what do you mean by that? Without sidewalks and pedestrian crossings, pedestrian navigation is only possible on roads, regardless of whether the roads are actually suitable for pedestrian use. Furthermore, manual route planning for pedestrians is made more difficult, as without separate sidewalks it is impossible to tell whether a road has suitable sidewalks or whether one has to walk on the road itself. 
To improve transparency in this area and to expand the practical applications of the OSM map - such as the use of OSM data by navigation and route-planning apps - OSM offers a wide range of features designed to depict the various aspects of pedestrian use as realistically as possible. Nevertheless, the design of a map remains an abstraction of reality, involving compromises in its representation, such as those discussed separate sidewalks and pedestrian crossings. 
In my view, the complexity of OSM data and maps continues to grow. New, increasingly high-resolution aerial and satellite images make it easier and easier to identify even the smallest details, such as streetlights or fire hydrants, with pinpoint accuracy. I see no development to limit this growing complexity on the data collection side. If it becomes necessary for technical or display reasons, OSM leaves this up to its data users - such as navigation apps -which can then filter out unwanted data or provide users with filtering options.
Best regards.
KingVik (2026-05-06 13:27:44+00:00): Dear Erick,
I hope you are doing well.
I’d like you to please double-check these edits, as they don’t appear to match any of the imagery sources mentioned. Kindly review them and either fix the issues or consider reverting the edits if necessary.
Thank you for your contributions, let’s continue working together to ensure we maintain high-quality edits.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182159047
Erick tamba (2026-05-06 14:47:41+00:00): “Thanks! I had already worked on the changesets in South Africa. While mapping, I noticed that Mapbox imagery works well in some areas, but building alignment is inconsistent some features line up correctly while others don’t. Because of this, I decided to revert the changesets. I appreciate you flagging it.
KingVik (2026-05-07 08:47:42+00:00): Thank you brother 
I appreciate your action to it