piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
michel60 (2025-11-30 22:02:22+00:00): Bonjour,
Je ne sais pas s'il y a un lien avec les modifications mais la ligne de bus 304 : Les Courtilles → Nanterre, Place de la Boule (8123065) est en défaut. GEOFABRIK OSM Inspector la montre en erreur (ligne en noir). Ci-dessous le lien :
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=2.20018&lat=48.88730&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.93&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
En cliquant sur une ligne en erreur, on peut avoir le détail de l'erreur.
En espérant que cette outil puisse vous aider
Cordialement Michel
MaliMrav (2025-11-12 08:33:13+00:00): Vratiću naziv na "Kod deda Stavre" (malo slovo "d"), da bi bio u skladu sa pravopisom:

'Sasvim je pogrešno pisanje svake reči početnim velikim slovom („Ulica Proleterskih Brigada", „Srpski Pokret Obnove" i sl.), do čega u poslednje vreme dolazi pod uticajem engleskog jezika i iz reklamnih razloga.'
synthfi (2025-11-12 05:54:50+00:00): you also included some changes in sacramento CA. can you break the changes next time into smaller changesets?
Sébastien Pi (2026-03-01 18:51:02+00:00): Je suis déçu. Je suis passé tout à l’heure et rien n’a bougé.
BardafFr (2026-03-02 10:05:44+00:00): Ca doit reprendre ce mois ci il me semble
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-12 09:47:27+00:00): skąd te nazwy bierzesz? Są rosnące wątpliwości co do nazw które dodajesz/usuwasz więc proszę podawaj skąd je bierzesz

a, nastąpiło wycofanie tej edycji za brak sensownego opisu zmian, po tym jak Jerzy Jeżewski był wielokrotnie proszony o poprawę (np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173092507 )
dmjab13 (2025-11-11 21:23:38+00:00): Please keep changesets like this to a single continent or country
ilias_ (2025-11-11 22:02:39+00:00): Or even better, to a single city
Sylabowy Kot (2025-11-12 10:57:28+00:00): And add some more words for such a changeset descriptions.
RobotFK (2025-11-11 20:41:43+00:00): No Website as any source
giopera (2026-01-14 20:01:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted after verification with the [DBSN](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Italy/DBSN) that localities like this do not exist in Italy
user_5359 (2025-11-12 08:26:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/12851706100 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-21 04:32:08+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Cleaned up SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186094960
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-26 07:15:33+00:00): DWG revert - uncertain information from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140043
mf8s003j (2025-11-24 02:55:48+00:00): Hey! I would recommend keeping the naming convention of the bus routes as what the wiki recomends ( "name"="Bus <ref>: <from> => <via> => <to>" )

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses#Step_2_-_Create_the_new_bus_relations
TagaSanPedroAko (2025-11-24 06:02:35+00:00): Further info at Community Forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/canada-transit-route-naming/136494 and https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/removal-of-from-to-tags-in-routes-if-the-name-already-contains-the-values/138323. 

FYI, there are already efforts to discourage the naming format that was specified there, and there's also a Canada-wide effort to replace or remove such names. Also, there are notes specifying the recommended naming format there as controversial, and it has been edited to discourage its further use.
TagaSanPedroAko (2025-11-24 06:14:24+00:00): Actually, there hasn't been edits changing the text for the Buses page, but the naming scheme has been already marked as discouraged on the top-level Public transport page.
mf8s003j (2025-12-01 22:50:02+00:00): Thanks for linking me to that conversation! I'm happy for us in Winnipeg to follow any agreed standard, but I want "the docs" to be updated as well to avoid... honestly to avoid this kind of bickering :P 

I agree that the name format of `"name"="Bus <ref>: <from> => <via> => <to>"` is super redundant. I'll continue any thoughts here in that broader community discussion.
hfs (2026-05-18 15:58:13+00:00): Hi RobotFK,

Du hast in dieser Änderung den Combi-Supermarkt reaktiviert, der davor für 6 Jahre als disused:shop=supermarket markiert war. Du hast shop=supermarket hinzugefügt, so dass beide Tags aktiv waren, was widersprüchlich ist.

Soweit ich das über das Internet beurteilen kann – ich bin nicht vor Ort –, gibt es hier keinen Combi mehr, sondern Rossmann und REWE Getränkemarkt.

Ich habe den Combi jetzt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182840113 gelöscht.

Beste Grüße
hfs
felipeeugenio (2025-11-12 12:22:33+00:00): Hola. Ojo porfa con borrar nodos con dirección. Si bien el restaurant puede que no exista, la dirección sigue ahí.
Tuve que recuperarlo.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174530792
Nine-tailed (2025-11-13 23:33:54+00:00): Вы создали дубликат уже существующего магазина. Правка будет откачена
Pamey44 (2025-11-12 19:35:48+00:00): Верхня лінія основного вододолу й справді простягається радше до висоти коло Менчила, але Воловецький перевал відноситься вже до масиву Вододільного хребта і він знаходиться на одному ж хребті з Явірником Великим, отже весь той відрог на північ від Явірника не може бути частиною хр. Бердо, що належить до Стрийсько-Сянської Верховини, це радше перехідна ділянка, тому провести логічніше було б над витіком Стрия.
Myazyk (2025-11-14 21:01:03+00:00): Можливо
NeisBot (2025-11-11 21:18:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-11 21:18:41+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Tattoo and piercing studio"
NeisBot (2025-11-11 21:18:45+00:00): Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего описания могла бы быть: "Салон татуировок и пирсинга"
---
(Auto-translation)
trinityink (2025-11-11 21:28:36+00:00): Tattoo and piercing studio
NeisReview (2025-11-18 14:14:45+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/174531830
Nine-tailed (2025-11-13 23:30:34+00:00): Вы создали дубли уже существующих POI
Nine-tailed (2025-11-13 23:35:01+00:00): Правка будет откачена.
NeisBot (2025-11-11 21:24:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-11 21:24:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Pet grooming service in Zealand MI"
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-12 14:29:41+00:00): "Added houses" would be a better changeset comment.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174531665
VictorIE (2025-11-13 09:03:14+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1449893236/history

This way has a duplicate node in it, at the west end. I tried fixing it by removing the way from the relation and merging the nodes. However, when I go to put it back in the relation, there are four relations called Greater_Dublin_Area_Cycle_Network

Help!
MacLondon (2025-11-13 12:19:43+00:00): I've removed that duplicate node now.
gscholz (2025-11-13 08:37:55+00:00): Hi confidence_19,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines. Especially way 1436291192 is affected here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436291192/history#map=21/5.5656503/-0.3165202&layers=C

Can you please fix this?

Guido
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-12 04:29:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/389442964

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
voidaere (2025-11-11 22:37:02+00:00): Sorry, this is my first edit to OSM. A better title would have been "Added Flock ALPR"
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-12 08:04:50+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13296855885/history has id = U57616487 that was added in this edit
What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?
Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Or maybe this key can and should be documented as useful tagging schema?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-12 08:05:52+00:00): maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref would fit?
Stefano_1973 (2025-11-12 08:13:05+00:00): Hello Mateusz,
It is the internal id of a UPS access point.
I tried to put it in the ref field but it would be shown instead of the name when rendered.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-12 12:56:18+00:00): "it would be shown instead of the name when rendered" that does not seems to be a good reason to deliberately choose weird tag

especially as amenity=post_depot will not be rendered at all, the same for its label, anyway - except rare data consumers and editors
Stefano_1973 (2025-11-12 13:53:52+00:00): I have put it in a note field now. Feel free to make it better.
user_5359 (2025-11-12 10:19:05+00:00): Hello! Please check the new version of the church to see if the correction is correct. Unfortunately, I do not know the source of the reference, so I cannot check it myself.
tagishsimon (2025-11-17 11:49:17+00:00): Yes, looks good now. Sorry about my error; thank you for fixing it.

I'll get around to documenting the ref sometime. It's here: https://online.aberdeenshire.gov.uk/smrpub/master/detail.aspx?refno=NK14NW0419
Molandfreak (2025-11-12 04:32:43+00:00): Must have been some expansion over the Atlantic…
campbelltree (2025-11-12 06:04:34+00:00): The edit to the solar farm itself looks good; but you also have some unrelated far away trees in the same change.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174534169
coatix (2025-12-28 11:49:03+00:00): Hi :) Bitte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix verwenden statt die Node komplett zu löschen.

fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176524269
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-11-15 17:30:40+00:00): Moin Wieland,
diese Änderung war unnötig.
razed:building dient lediglich als Notiz an Mapper, um zu verhindern, dann Gebäude ohne Ortskenntnis wieder eingetragen werden. Ein note reicht da auch vollkommen aus.
Viele Grüße
wielandb (2025-11-23 10:34:44+00:00): Hi Roger,

vielen Dank für dein Feedback!
Ich finde dass diese Änderung nicht nur nicht unnötig, sondern ein wichtiger Teil der QA ist.
Deswegem habe ich eine Maproulette-Challenge entworfen, die ich u.a. mit diesem Änderungssatz getestet habe. Wenn ich die Challenge zur Diskussion stelle, bevor ich sie öffentlich schalte, würde ich mich sehr über deinen Input in der Diskussion freuen. 
Viele Grüße
SomeoneElse (2025-11-30 19:34:35+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!,

On this changeset you've used a "source=Google Maps" tag. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source.
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK. If not, we'll have to undo this change.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
will_p (2025-11-14 15:38:39+00:00): Hi,

I notice you are currently mapping pavements as separate ways in Ilkeston. Please could you be careful to maintain good routing for walking and cycling while doing this. 

I notice a few locations where it currently appears problematic. In these places you have disconnected paths from roads only joining them with the pavements.

For example:
1. The multi-user path that connects the Nutbrook Trail with Little Hallam Hill is no longer connected to the road. This will break cycle routing and might cause pedestrians to be routed via a circuitous route.
This cycle routing shows the problem:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_bicycle&route=52.959232%2C-1.313446%3B52.95935%2C-1.31536

2. The public footpath that runs from Lower Stanton Road to The Spinney is no longer connected to Nursery Hollow. This will lead to circuitous and confusing pedestrian routing instructions:
See: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=52.960786%2C-1.311134%3B52.961772%2C-1.307287

Thanks,
Will
Aethonatic (2025-11-15 01:40:05+00:00): Thanks for letting me know, I'll try to rectify these in the morning.
Aethonatic (2025-11-15 09:50:58+00:00): I've rectified these in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174679547, please let me know if there's any other issues I should be aware of.
will_p (2025-11-17 11:43:00+00:00): Thanks for fixing the issues I raised. 

I haven't noticed any other specific issues (I've not checked carefully). I just want to point out in general that adding separate sidewalks can easily break routing, particularly for walking. Therefore, please be careful to add plenty of interconnections, especially at junctions.
oldnab (2025-11-30 18:56:40+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci d'avoir corrigé le champ operator. J'ai vérifié sur NSI et tu as raison sur l'utilisation des minuscules. J'ai repris les 1500 PAV que j'avais cartographié depuis 8 mois pour changer dans ce sens. 
Bonnes cartos sur OSM à toi.
Glassman (2025-11-12 01:10:16+00:00): Thanks for fixing this up. I plan to drive by tomorrow to hopefully get some imagery to update the roundabout
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174535207
YomanNH (2025-11-17 14:22:54+00:00): Nie wiem jaki był cel tej edycji, ale wygląda jak wandalizm. Wycofałem zmiany.
CAI Stabia (2025-11-12 09:31:47+00:00): Buongiorno Giovanni,
in questo changeset hai cancellato la vecchia way e creato una nuova way.
Come mai non hai modificato la vecchia in modo da conservare la history?

La way da te creata ha il tag surface=asphalt errato in quanto il sentierino ha fondo naturale. 
Inoltre trail_visibility=excellent non è corretto in quanto il tracciolino soprattutto d'estate è invaso da vegetazione e rovi.

Questi errori fanno capire che non hai modificato il sentiero in seguito ad un rilievo sul posto, mi auguro che potrai fornire indicazioni contrarie.
Purtroppo è necessaria estrema cautela per evitare incidenti sui sentieri in forte aumento sul nostro territorio e ti invitiamo quindi a migliorare la rete sentieristica solo di quel che verifichi sul posto, con strumentazione adeguata.

Infine, come già indicato in una non recente discussione, per il commento dei tuoi changeset ti invitiamo a non utilizzare stinghe predefinite (Perfezionamento di sentieri ed uso del suolo....) e a dettagliare meglio cosa hai modificato, al fine di facilitare il lavoro di verifica degli altri mapper, seguendo le linee guida di OSM:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Procediamo a modificare i tag errati
Giovanni Forgione (2025-12-03 09:22:26+00:00): Il "vecchio" sentiero per scendere a Tordigliano era in alcuni tratti inesistente. La realtà e cioè il sentiero frequentato ed esistente oggi è esattamente quello che ho disegnato io. Si tratta di alternanza di sentiero sterrato e gradini. Non è immaginabile inserire il tag asfalto su un sentiero del genere. Dove hai visto il tag asfalto? Sono daccordo per il discorso della sicurezza e per questo è importante che sulla mappa ci siano i sentieri reali, esistenti oggi e non quelli vecchi non più frequentati. Sono a disposizione per qualsiasi modifica che immetta parametri reali, veri e sono disponibile anche ad una verifica sul posto quando vuoi tu; non ho problemi di calendario perché sono pensionato.
Branko Kokanovic (2025-11-12 23:11:21+00:00): Zdravo, dobar dan Dragane.

Opet su Vam sve izmene izbrisane. To što radite nije po pravilima naše zajednice. Molimo Vas da odgovorite na ovu diskusiju i da probamo da nađemo zajednički jezik jer ćete opet biti blokirani. Ako Vam je lakše, tu smo na Telegram kanalu https://t.me/osm_sr ili otvorite temu na našem forumu https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/rs/64. Samo nemojte više raditi iste izmene, opet će biti izbrisane. Hvala unapred!
felipeeugenio (2025-11-12 12:14:35+00:00): Hola Joaquín
Te pedimos por favor tomar contacto con la comunidad o al menos contestar los comentarios que han hecho a tus cambios (https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=23469511).

 No pasa un día sin que cambies el nombre de los edificios. A estas alturas no hay ninguna credibilidad sobre el real nombre de estos.

Además hay que sumar una buena cantidad de errores en cada edición que repites incluso después que te los advierten y corrigen.

Nada de esto es grave y, de hecho, es muy normal entre quienes comienzan, pero necesitamos que mires los comentarios y aprendas.  Estas afectando el trabajo de otras personas también.

Saludos y gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174537402
aharvey (2025-11-12 20:07:22+00:00): for next time, leave off the "kmh" if it's km/h, that's assumed by default.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-11-13 02:14:58+00:00): Hello, why did you re-upgrade this portion of Ted Williams Pkwy to trunk? It doesn't connect to any other trunk roads east of I-15.
Yushclay (2025-11-13 06:39:30+00:00): "I'm just letting that stop there since that's the first traffic light after Rancho Carmel Dr. I'd say my OSM editor philosophy leans towards what matches what's been built as opposed to importance when it comes to road stubs so that the symbology on the map matches the driver expectation on the ground, so I feel it's should be fine to let it look awkward. Between Shoal Creek and Pomerado Rd is a flex between trunk and primary on the ground, but definitely not Twin Peaks Rd like we saw in the original. But I can agree that it's not as important to the network, just that the symbology doesn't match with what's on the ground. Network importance would matter to me after Shoal Creek Dr." My comment from the other changeset.
willkmis (2025-12-02 14:21:48+00:00): I don't understand how this road could be tagged differently in either direction. Hw=trunk should denote importance to the overall road network, not access or whether there are driveways or something.
Yushclay (2025-12-02 17:50:13+00:00): Yeah, I'm debating on what to do here, but I'm leaning on removing trunk tags from Pacific Hwy east of Barnett Ave and tag the rest of Barnett Ave and Lytton St to Rosecrans.  I did have a DM with the suggestion to connect the trunk roads and not leave it as a spur, so I'm also considering tagging Camino del Rio West and Rosecrans St to the junction with Lytton St.
user_5359 (2025-11-12 08:09:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on  the new version on the parking area. A parking aisle istn't a parking slot.
user_5359 (2025-11-12 08:11:24+00:00): Did you ask the owner for permission to use the data source? Credits in the form of a key source_ref are usually not sufficient because it can be deleted or changed.
Please have also a look on https://www.osm.org/node/12776614264 . Incidentally, a church does not become a church because the word “church” is mentioned in its name.
ejderuby (2025-11-19 14:45:32+00:00): @user_5359 I didn't use Parking Aisles as parking slots. Here's the short description of a Parking Aisle: "a subordinated way in a parking lot between rows of parking spaces that vehicles use to drive into and out of the spaces." This is how I used them. I copied the way I see them used everywhere locally.
user_5359 (2025-11-19 14:48:40+00:00): Did you have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1449937691/history/1?
Kovoschiz (2025-11-12 07:44:32+00:00): 1. `roundtrip=` should not be used on `=route_master` 
2. It's not completed yet
Cookie Guru (2025-11-12 04:46:33+00:00): Plat map referenced in edit notes: https://aqua.kingcounty.gov/assessor/emap/InternetPDF/qs_NW192505.pdf
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-12 05:11:06+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13298807419

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
nevw (2025-11-12 07:21:28+00:00): Hi, this appears misplaced on the map. You website has 158-166 High St and you have tagged close to thaty but other addresses in this section of High St are around #100. 
Can you relocate to to the correct location or if correct, fix the addr:housenumber.
Also you have tagged this as a supermarket...
shop=car might be more suitable.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:35:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:34:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
arjunaraoc (2025-12-01 09:58:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). You can add full address details on tags. Take care not to edit other entities like GBA, wherein you removed boundary=administrative.  The issue was resolved through https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7902476/history/35
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174540987
Bienson (2025-11-15 08:26:42+00:00): Hier befindet sich aber dann wohl weiterhin ein Sportzentrum namens "Rhein.-Westf. Realschule"?
VRR-OSM (2026-04-08 09:59:52+00:00): Moin,

mir ist aufgefallen, dass die Fußwege südlich des Schulgebäudes mit access= private getagged sind. Ist das richtig so? Alle anderen Wege in dem Komplex sind ohne das Tag.
Ich kenne mich vor Ort nicht aus, daher die Frage.
Beste Grüße
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:38:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321356 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Bahamas
Pontius (2025-11-12 13:47:31+00:00): https://docs.fs.illinois.edu/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/UI-Campus-Map-GIS_148.pdf
campbelltree (2025-11-13 16:44:21+00:00): oh nice, will see if I can put that in without attaching it to sidewalks :)
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:41:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321469 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Ireland