piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gurglypipe (2025-08-28 15:56:31+00:00): Yeah, there’s a watercourse visible on the OS OpenData StreetView imagery. It might be seasonal, if it wasn’t visible when you cycled through.

I originally mapped this as a bridge on a survey in 2019 (changeset 70642115), but I might have been lax about the difference between bridge and culvert.

I’ve added the stream/ditch and changed the bridge to a culvert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171142902. Please let me know if that matches what you saw, as I haven’t visited for a few months :)
Pawcio (2025-08-28 16:29:38+00:00): It's fine for me. I really didn't pay attention whether it was a bridge or culvert.
gurglypipe (2025-08-28 16:39:38+00:00): Great, thanks for checking :)
GerdP (2025-11-18 16:19:47+00:00): Moin aus WIldeshausen!
Ich habe hier gerade das bicycle=no zu yes gemacht: https://www.osm.org/way/175489520
Ein bicycle=no bitte nur setzen, wo ein Verbotsschild (VZ DE:254) steht. Wenn am Nebenweg ein Gehweg+Radverkehr frei ist, dann ist Radfahren auf der Fahrbahn erlaubt, manchmal sogar durch andere Schilder explizit erwünscht. Bei VZ240 (Gemeinsamer Geh+Radweg) setzt man bicycle=use_sidepath, sofern der Nebenweg separat erfasst ist. Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren
Soll ich helfen, diese Änderung zurückzunehmen?
German C (2025-12-03 18:14:19+00:00): Hola Lolj, no debes eliminar elementos y volverlos a crear como nuevos ya que se pierde el historial https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mantener_el_historial , lo que se debe es mejorar la geometría, no debes colocar abreviaturas https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Abreviaturas_(no_hacer_esto) el elemento original que eliminaste https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1421231300 tenia el nombre correcto sin abreviaturas, si un restaurante ya no existe no lo elimines https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9491206379, en vez de eso poner el local como disponible https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dvacant , con eso evitar perder el historial.
German C (2025-12-03 17:59:30+00:00): Hola Lolj, ¿por qué eliminaste los 38 edificios de la urbanización llamada colseguros norte? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=171106091 (lo rojo fue lo que eliminaste)
Mashin (2025-08-28 20:02:17+00:00): Hi thanks for improving OSM!

just please don't forget to fill city/town in the address field.
thanks
rempshaener (2025-08-28 17:50:35+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Seit 2008 war Flensburg „town“.
Am 05.03.2023 wurde Flensburg von town auf city umgestellt.
Am 06.10.2024 wurde Flensburg von city auf town umgestellt. Begründung: „Reclassified Flensburg as a town not a city (<100 000 inhabitants)“
Du stellst heute Flensburg von town auf city. Begründung: „Flensburg wieder zur Stadt getagged, Städte müssen nicht ausdrücklich > 100000 Bewohner haben „

Dazu folgende Anmerkungen:
- So beginnen „Edit-Wars“, sofern er nicht längst läuft.
- Angemessen wäre es, mindestens den letzten Änderer per Changeset-Kommentar anzuschreiben und das Problem zu diskutieren.
- Alternativ hier: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56
- Eine inhaltliche Anmerkung; das Wiki ist eigentlich eindeutig „Großstädte haben im Regelfall eine Einwohnerzahl von mindestens 100.000 Einwohner und sind größer als die umliegenden Städte.“ Bislang habe ich nirgendwo gelesen, wieso dieser Regelfall nicht greift.

Viele Grüße
NewChest (2025-08-28 19:02:09+00:00): Moin

Danke für deine Anmerkungen, ich war nur etwas verwirrt da andere Städte wie etwa Esbjerg in Dänemark als "Tag:place=city" getagged sind obwohl diese eine Bevölkerungszahl von 71,554 hat.

Ich hielt ein Kommentar auf dem Changeset wo Flensburg wieder auf town getagged wurde als aussichtslos, da der User schon seit mehreren Monaten inaktiv war. Aber  du hast recht, ich hätte es trotzdem zuerst versuchen sollen.

Sollte ich den Ort fürs erste wieder zu town taggen?
rempshaener (2025-08-28 20:18:48+00:00): Hallo,
meine ganz persönliche Einschätzung: ich würde es erst mal so lassen - die Gelegenheit zur Diskussion kommt spätestens mit der nächsten Änderung.
Viele Grüße
muralito (2025-08-28 17:03:29+00:00): El estandar de direcciones en Uruguay no incluye el barrio, a lo sumo se usa como adicional informativo, y además es algo informalmente definido, asi que no deberia hacerse automaticamente ya que ademas de ser propenso a error es en muchos casos ambiguo o no verificable.
Eddie845 (2025-08-29 04:37:40+00:00): Ciudad de las Artes Resiste.
Eddie845 (2025-11-20 04:12:07+00:00): Espero pronto poder georreferenciar los árboles del Parque de la Dignidad, por si se les ocurre destruir este parque también :(
HellMap (2025-08-29 10:07:37+00:00): Hello,

What is this road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1425453312 supposed to be here? It's not on the aerial. If you have surveyed this as a new road, then it needs an actual classification.
bdentremont (2025-08-27 23:34:03+00:00): Nice work!  I'd not expected to find an internet source specifically documenting a "roundabout... known as" and appreciate you looking out for your home state.
Paul Flo Williams (2025-09-10 16:09:33+00:00): Was the tower on the eye hospital supposed to be 8 metres high? It's been set to 80 metres, and the other one to 20 metres?
UtterClutter (2025-09-10 18:05:40+00:00): Hi Paul, I made a bit of a pig's ear of that. They look like towers but are actually just parapets, and walls of any height would not render in Urban Eye 3D. It only renders building or building:part.
I've done a proper 3D job on it now, see what you think.
I might make a relation for the RSCH this evening.
Paul Flo Williams (2025-09-10 19:45:24+00:00): I've been waiting 24 hours for updates in F4 Map after 3D changes. Looks like I need to install JOSM!
UtterClutter (2025-09-10 20:27:22+00:00): Oh hell yeah!
JOSM is good. It's ugly as sin to look at, but all of the error checking behind the UI in the code is excellent. 
Urban Eye is a great 3D viewer plug-in for JOSM as it works on your local cache without requiring the tedium of uploading and checking to see how it renders
UtterClutter (2025-09-10 20:41:52+00:00): Another thought, when I  was using F4 Map a lot more, I thought their server was really slow in updating.
It turned out that it was my browser's local cache which simply wasn't getting flushed. Depending on you environment and web browser, look up the shortcut key for a deep cache flush.
UtterClutter (2025-09-10 20:45:52+00:00): Often, F5 simply doesn't cut it.
With Brave, I use CTRL+Shift+R
custodiankeyy (2025-08-28 17:11:11+00:00): Değişikliğiniz küfür içerdiği için geri alınmıştır. Lütfen düzenleme yaparken gerçek bilgileri kullanarak haritalandırma yapın.
lamms (2025-08-29 12:30:40+00:00): thanks!
Kovoschiz (2025-08-28 17:29:55+00:00): Please don't attach other features to roads. They are different things. This is not realistic or accurate, and makes editing difficult.
citrula (2025-08-28 16:20:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions. Please note that google streetview isn't allowed for OSM contributions

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google
muralito (2025-08-28 17:06:48+00:00): Gracias! quedan algunos de estos casos de clasificacion superior a la real por distintas partes del territorio, no tanto secondary como era este, pero si tertiary unpaved, que en muchos casos creeria que no son transitables salvo en 4x4, y en otros hasta quedan sumergidos por rios o embalses. Habria que ver si es posible encararlo de una forma sistematica, porque son un problema para la confiabilidad del mapa y los ruteos...
b-jazz (2025-08-28 02:05:29+00:00): Wait! What? How did THAT happen!? Harumph.
fortera_au (2025-08-28 02:48:07+00:00): Hi, please see the comments on 171110064, as they are partially relevant here.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171110032
fortera_au (2025-08-28 02:47:20+00:00): Hi, is there now a fee for this parking space? You've removed fee=no but not replaced it. Is it also free for anyone to park there, or just for public transport users. access=yes means anyone can use it, not just public transport users.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171110064
K@nelK (2025-08-28 04:11:16+00:00): Hi there,
Its free for anyone to park there. Sorry my first edit. I think I have corrected it.
fortera_au (2025-08-28 04:19:14+00:00): Thanks for fixing that up, I'd probably recommend changing access back to permissive unless it's definitely available for general use.

If you're ever unsure about something, check out the forums at https://community.openstreetmap.org, or the OSM World Discord has an #oceania chat which is fairly active.
Jarek 🚲 (2025-08-28 02:24:23+00:00): Quoting the first paragraph of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian :

"A highway=pedestrian is a road or area designated mainly or exclusively for pedestrians. Often found in shopping areas, town centres, places with tourism attractions and recreation/civic areas, where wide expanses of hard surface are provided for pedestrians to walk. [...] Vehicle traffic is generally restricted, with possible exceptions for taxi and delivery services. Cyclists may or may not be permitted, as can be specified by bicycle=*. "

All of this applies to the ways I've changed here. Pedestrians are the primary road users, by design and in practice. Bicycles are allowed and there's a fair amount of them, hence bicycle=yes, but due to the amount of pedestrians to be navigated around, it's not really an MUP that would be used for exercise or commuting (hence why I retagged the part south of the bridge that was previously a cycleway). Motor vehicles are limited to maintenance vehicles.

Some of the other paths on the island could arguably be changed to pedestrian too (e.g. Lakeshore Avenue close to the pier), but this one is particularly clear example.

BTW I saw that two different capitalizations were used for Avenue of the Islands and JOSM warned me about them, but I don't know which one is right so I didn't change that.
Glassman (2025-08-29 02:05:24+00:00): #TIP; We don't have many living streets in the US. Washington State did just pass a law making what looks like a living street, but this looks more like a residential street. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171110420
user_5359 (2025-08-28 06:39:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database.
Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes.
Glassman (2025-08-29 02:08:38+00:00): Can you review this edit, the Blueberry Lane looks like a unclassified road. A track is typically what is used for logging or farming.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171110785
Glassman (2025-08-29 02:13:04+00:00): The county map does show Blueberry lane. See https://pendoreilleco.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=3da51727ed494b5080a10f928f2d3674. But it looks like we don't agree with the county on the route it takes. 

Let me know if you need help sorting this out. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171110785
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-08-28 22:53:11+00:00): Did I say "Way" Boulevard? I meant Ryan Boulevard 🤦‍♂️
AndreaDp271 (2025-08-28 08:22:23+00:00): Hi there, and thanks a lot for your contribution! 🌟 Just a little tip for future edits: keeping changesets small and local can make things smoother for everyone. It helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, and keeps the map even more accurate.

A few friendly suggestions:
• Focus edits within a small geographical area (like a single city, district, or province)
• Try not to mix far-apart locations in one changeset
• Save/upload before starting work in a totally different area

If you’re curious, the wiki explains more here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks again for your mapping energy, and happy mapping! 🗺️
Baloo Uriza (2025-08-29 13:33:26+00:00): Looks like all of the lane count reduction changes aren't accurate either, unless there was a traffic reconfiguration more recent than aerial imagery.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171111424
Ruslan Fatih (2025-08-28 13:22:47+00:00): EvgenyaKZ пожалуйста. Перестаньте переименовывать пункты эвакуации в МЧС.
Baconcrisp (2025-09-02 20:51:20+00:00): Hello Camello_AR!

Can I ask why you changed the oneway tag from "yes" to "no" on this secondary? Based on the imagery and surrounding data context this way should be a oneway since the ways leading to/from this piece are also oneways.

As it is now, routing will be partially confused since there is a bi-directional road in-between two oneways that lead to the motorway.

Will you please fix this when you get a chance?

Thanks, 
Baconcrisp
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171112437
Camello_AR (2025-09-04 02:45:44+00:00): Fue una edición por intermedio de maproulette, corrigiendo nombres con diferencias de escritura. Posiblemente al copiar el nombre o la tarea (desconozco el porque) se modificó el tag oneway. Ya lo corrijo.
This was an maproulette intermediated edition fixing minor street names diferencies (maybe typos). Maybe copying the name or the task itself the oneway tag was modified (I don´t know why). I´ll fix inmediatly
Baconcrisp (2025-09-04 14:09:20+00:00): No worries. Thank you for the quick response and fix!

Happy mapping!
aceman444 (2026-06-08 15:45:49+00:00): Znacka 'service'???
Vydajna sa znaci ako napri tu:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3500549466
Sada znaciek post_office* .
vlakos555 (2026-06-08 17:48:28+00:00): Ďakujem za poučenie a opravu.
Tomas_J (2026-06-09 14:52:41+00:00): Aj ja som sa poučil :)
aceman444 (2026-06-09 19:31:52+00:00): Az teraz je to opravene :) Mam takychto pikosiek cakat v Petrzalke viac?
vlakos555 (2026-06-10 03:35:02+00:00): Ak niečo robím prvýkrát, chybička sa môže vyskytnúť. Prínosom je upozornenie na problém. Skúsenejší to opravia.
aceman444 (2026-06-10 16:26:04+00:00): Jasne, preto novu vec, ktoru neviete zakreslit, dajte do poznamky, alebo do fixme znacky. Pouzit na to znacku co sa pouziva na ine (typ ucelovej komunikacie), je divne, vsimol som si to len nahodou:)
vlakos555 (2026-06-10 16:45:33+00:00): Ahaaa. Teraz je to vysvetlené ako treba. Ďskujem. Učím sa.
i2004 (2025-09-02 15:45:25+00:00): salen de retiro? tanto 61 y 62 por madero?
AgusQui (2025-09-02 17:12:51+00:00): Por hora sí, no van a Once ninguno de los dos.
Tibo05200 (2025-11-16 18:59:37+00:00): Bonjour

je me permet de te contacter ici pour eclaircir la situation sur ce groupe de modification.

à priori c'est pas ton coeur de sujet (vu le reste de tes modification) https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/eultra/history?before=171315653#map=9/44.456/6.334

ici on a un sujet un peu compliqué: les sentier que tu as empruntés sont tous illégaux ou presque et passent tous sur des terrain privé... ils posent beaucoup de soucis et tant qu'aucune solutions solide sera proposé et prise en main par les autorité locale, je supprimerai la plupart d'entre eux... (je te laisse cette page du forum sur le sujet: https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/suppression-recurrente-de-chemins-sur-terrains-prives-dans-le-05/31488/30 ) on va pas se mettre à afficher des panneau "privé" de partout je n'enlève pas le droit aux locaux de passer mais la massification des pratique outdoor est invivable. et en plus pour les tracer tu as du passer par des clotures (parfois doublé tellement on veut plus de passage) à des endroit clairement indiqué comme n'étant pas ouvert à la circulation donc merci mais non merci.

Bonne semaine
eultra (2025-11-17 07:21:06+00:00): Je suis surpris que tant d'utilisateurs semblent déterminés à aller à l'encontre du consensus mondial sur le balisage des chemins sur des propriétés privées, préférant supprimer des informations valides plutôt que de les baliser correctement. Je pensais que la question était réglée depuis longtemps : si un chemin existe, il doit être balisé comme tel, et s'il se trouve sur une propriété privée, il doit être balisé comme access=private. Mais je vous laisse faire vos propres erreurs.
Tibo05200 (2025-11-17 11:19:50+00:00): comme dit dans la page de forum que je vous ai mi en lien, le access=private ne résoud pas la question sur l'ensemble des platformes... l'utilisation du was devrait fonctionner mais c'est aussi aux autorités locales de s'en emparer.
eultra (2025-11-17 12:36:40+00:00): Oui, mais la discussion dans ce forum est entièrement contre tu et le point que tu essaye de faire valoir dans tes commentaires.
Tibo05200 (2025-11-17 12:59:41+00:00): je fais simplement valoir que le "private" ne fonctionne pas... je ne sais pas suffisamment me servir de OSM pour régler "proprement" le problème.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-28 06:00:55+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/894334150

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Andrea Del Sarto (2026-07-25 13:30:04+00:00): Ciao,
ho aggiornato la relazione, dopo rilievo sul campo in quella zona
sarebbe da verificare anche il resto del percorso
drazde (2026-07-25 14:45:49+00:00): Ciao Andrea,
ho un vago ricordo di quel sentiero ma non sono al pc, 
controllo questa sera confrontando la cartografia SAT, in caso chiedo in commissione sentieri
Andrea Del Sarto (2026-07-26 13:57:08+00:00): Ciao,
ho aggiornato la parte di percorso da Prati di Gaggia fino ad Andalo
drazde (2026-07-26 16:29:39+00:00): Grazie Andrea
aggiorno anche la cartografia SAT
Marco
AbdulLatif hazeb (2026-01-29 13:33:25+00:00): نعم هذة هي الطريق الصحيح لمنزلي
buy_osmand (2025-08-29 01:24:49+00:00): I'm stating facts, in your changeset tag `imagery` the value does not match to what you have declared in your comment. Please do correction where necessary in your future compensated works. Have a good day‼
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171116171
sbedwal_Lyft (2025-08-29 12:21:18+00:00): Hi Buy_osmand!

My name is Santosh and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft.

Thank you very much for bringing this to our attention. I apologize for the conflicting information. We will take measures to prevent such situations in the future

Best regards, Santosh
Supaplex (2025-08-28 07:29:18+00:00): 全台的地址修正
Rainero (2025-09-02 19:33:05+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171137394
due to use of an illicit source (Google Street View).
rokas_osm (2025-08-28 07:02:18+00:00): The elevator is scheduled to be commissioned in the next few weeks, and I will make the change as soon as it is operational.
rokas_osm (2025-09-11 06:53:22+00:00): Lift should be commissioned on 13.09.2025
Mannivu (2025-08-28 12:41:59+00:00): Ciao, probabilmente il fatto che fosse mostrata tutta in bianco era perché qualche segmento era stato alterato e la relazione risultava non chiusa. Ora io lo vedo correttamente.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171116843
Johnny Carlsen (2025-09-02 03:23:51+00:00): Hi Coolsun,

I'm pretty sure leisure=nature_reserve are independent from natural=wood.

natural=wood describes the actual land cover and leisure=nature_reserve describes a protected boundary that may or may not follow the land cover.

What is your source for this nature reserve?

I am going to change this back to natural=wood, and then you are welcome to draw your nature_reserve boundary based on your source.

Here is an example of how it is done with a national park:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5964085

If I am mistaken, then please correct me. The last thing I want is an edit war.
eggie (2025-08-28 07:44:54+00:00): In dat water zat een fout. Dat kwam zich zelf weer tegen. Ik heb het aangepast met een multipolygoon.
Je zag anders alleen maar water in het middenvak.
Denk paar keer CTRL-F5 voor het effect. 
Water en landuse kun je beter met editor josm aanpakken. 

Groet
eggie

MVG
eggie
Moesm (2025-08-28 07:55:02+00:00): Dank voor de controle en de aanpassing. Zat al een tijdje te stoeien met de rendering van het water. Zal me toch is moeten verdiepen in josm.
eggie (2025-08-28 08:03:28+00:00): Hier een draadje over josm.. Je zult daar toch niet aan ontkomen. 

editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047

Die culverts heb ik nog wel vastgemaakt aan de watervlakken.
eggie (2025-08-28 08:04:48+00:00): Dat water bij de begraafplaats is nu een multipolygoon met als inner een lijnelement zonder tags.
Moesm (2025-08-28 08:24:45+00:00): Mooie post over josm. Ga ik zeker naar kijken.

Het ziet er nu weer netjes uit. Super!
eteb3 (2025-09-04 08:18:05+00:00): Map elements in relation:Airport Cycleway now match signs on the ground between Savile Way and Westwood Bridge incl.

See cs 171204400
mueschel (2025-09-04 18:18:21+00:00): Hi,
you added 'sibat=yes' to several objects. This tag is not used in any other place - what does it mean?
bartgron (2025-08-28 09:23:34+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
MontyM (2025-08-28 08:26:43+00:00): Ich habe gehört, dass diese Strecke B168 heißt und nicht B168N.
Fabian1429 (2025-08-28 08:43:20+00:00): Das ‚n‘ steht für ‚neu‘ (also B168neu) und wird in OSM oft genutzt, wenn eine neue Trasse eröffnet wird, die parallel oder ersetzend zur bestehenden Straße verläuft. So lassen sich die neue und die alte Strecke in der Anfangszeit klar unterscheiden. Nach einer gewissen Eingewöhnungsphase (meist ein halbes bis ein Jahr), wenn sich die Bezeichnung etabliert hat und keine Verwechslungsgefahr mehr besteht, wird das ‚n‘ wieder entfernt. Das ist gängige Praxis bei neuen Ortsumgehungen.“

Grüße
söm4324 (2025-10-04 14:31:33+00:00): Hallo ralfdoma,
hast du hier mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1425521246 einen Weg doppelt eingetragen? Er hat irgendwie den gleichen Verlauf wie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1416562969 .
Kannst dudir das bitte nochmal anschauen? Danke!
ralfdoma (2025-10-05 17:36:17+00:00): Sorry, das habe ich versemmelt. Müsste schon lange nichts mehr reinmalen. Sind im Sommer nämlich dort sinnlos im Kreis gefahren weil der Weg nicht in der OSM war. Ist korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis
custodiankeyy (2025-08-28 17:12:19+00:00): Lütfen büyük değişiklik seti yapmaktan kaçınalım.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Mapwriter5252 (2025-08-29 18:39:48+00:00): Uyarınız için teşekkür ederim. Geniş alanları kapsayan düzenlemelerin uygun olmadığını bilmiyordum. Amacım katkı sunmaktı fakat farkında olmadan gereğinden fazla alanı etkilemişim. 
Bundan sonra daha küçük alanlara odaklanarak, gerekirse daha fazla ama sınırlı kapsamlı düzenlemeler yapmaya özen göstereceğim. Bu konuyu bana ilettiğiniz için ayrıca teşekkür ederim; dikkat edeceğim.
dafadllyn (2025-09-07 06:29:26+00:00): Hallo Thomaso58!

Woher hast du die Namen "Fähre Zehndermätteli Nord" und "Fähre Zehndermätteli Süd" für die Anlegestellen? Sind das offizielle Bezeichnungen? (Du hast leider keine source=* angegeben.)

Gruss
dafadllyn (2025-09-07 06:30:44+00:00): PS: Im DIDOK (https://didok.osm.ch/) finde ich keine Namen.