piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 04:53:45+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339182

https://osm.org/changeset/184339182
Buraddo (2026-07-09 15:51:44+00:00): Reverted in #185417204
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 04:54:07+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339187

https://osm.org/changeset/184339187
dzidek23 (2026-06-20 13:08:24+00:00): Just wonder, wouldn't it be better to keep the path in place and mark it as private?
As this is clearly visible in the aerial photos, there's a good chance someone might add it as viable path.
Adambro (2026-06-21 09:31:48+00:00): That's a good question. Ultimately the path is just worn into the field so that will disappear fairly quickly though will still be on aerial photos for many years. I think at this point I'm of the view that the path has gone and it is right to remove it. I think it has stopped being a path now in any real sense, private or not, and is now just a worn section of field.

Based upon visiting this morning and taking some photos, I've added some of the new fencing that has been installed. Hopefully that might help to reduce risk someone adds the path just based on aerial photos.
silversurfer83 (2026-06-20 15:46:55+00:00): Hi :)

kleiner Tip: Dinge, die am besten rechtwinklig sein sollen kannst du mit der Taste "Q" einfach rechtwiklig machen (Toilettengebäude zB). Probier es mal aus

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184282469
Analogknipser (2026-06-20 19:04:39+00:00): Danke für den Tipp.
Hab auch jede Ladestation hinzugefügt welche dann zusammengefasst wurden zu einer. Leider kann ich das Gelände noch nicht genau Abstecken da es noch kein aktuelles Satellitenbild gibt um auch den genauen Bereich zu haben. Morgen schau ich mir das alles nochmal an und versuch  es weiter zu verbessern.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 04:54:31+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339191

https://osm.org/changeset/184339191
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 04:54:53+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339217

https://osm.org/changeset/184339217
silversurfer83 (2026-06-20 15:44:59+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM :)

thanks for helping with keeping the database up to date.

As you are new I'd like to say hello and leave a set of helping links which might make your work here even better.

There are some good practices which we try to observe:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets


Then there's the street cabinet you edited and tagged a "KVS-Nummer". In general we regard this kind of number as a ref=* and as such it should be tagged. 

If there are any questions regarding anything OSM please don't hesitate to reach out. You can find many helpful people at c.osm.org or in the international or German speaking Signal groups 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM_centric_Signal_accounts

happy mapping

silversurfer83
josm19902026 (2026-06-18 17:43:58+00:00): I’m off to get some rest... this website is truly addictive!
VLD0251 (2026-06-20 13:14:51+00:00): The added items are residential parking spaces, not separate parking lots. the excessive use of the amenity=parking tag needs to be fixed to match the real situation.
alexey_zakharenkov (2026-06-20 11:50:58+00:00): Здравствуйте.

По съездам https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1530672141 и https://www.osm.org/way/40437170 следует только трафик с primary-участка https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/79190854, поэтому их важность тоже primary. Как и некоторых других участков, которые вы изменили.
Stalker61 (2026-06-20 14:54:45+00:00): Здравствуйте. Слабый аргумент. Там трафик от развязки до кольца на Станке Димитрова в обе стороны максимальный. Primary  этот участок сделали совершенно осознанно, чтобы навигаторы не тащили в город при въезде.
Stalker61 (2026-06-20 14:57:11+00:00): Ну и отдельный вей до Р-120 в одну полосу без физического разделения это уже явный перебор.
Stalker61 (2026-06-20 14:59:56+00:00): Вот с этим товарисчем https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/DenchikBorovoy2011/history#map=6/50.54/37.62 лучше работу проводите. Явно будет полезнее для проекта.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 04:55:19+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339226

https://osm.org/changeset/184339226
Altts (2026-06-18 18:01:19+00:00): Correction: the imagery source used was Esri World Imagery
Buraddo (2026-07-09 15:51:38+00:00): Reverted in #185417204
Glassman (2026-06-18 21:55:16+00:00): The way you added to the house on the left should likely be tagged as highway=service + service=driveway. Can you review?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184285322
Langestreet (2026-06-18 22:13:26+00:00): That change would also be fine.  The "House" on the left is not a house, but a commercial workshop.
Matt McCutchen (2026-06-18 18:49:06+00:00): The restriction was preventing a left turn from southbound Cedar Lane to Simpson Mill Drive, but Esri World Imagery shows a turn lane and Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=575778145056265) shows no evidence of a turn restriction.  The restriction also prevented a right turn without using the channelized lane, but this doesn't seem important to me, and for comparison, the analogous restriction for a right turn from eastbound Grace Drive is not mapped.  I just visited here a long time ago and don't live here, so if you have better information, feel free to overwrite this changeset.
felipeeugenio (2026-06-18 21:18:28+00:00): Hola. Access=no es para recintos militares o espacios sumamente restringidos. Qué es lo que en realidad pasa en ese sendero? es privado? saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184286005
CrstblS (2026-06-18 23:22:11+00:00): Perdón felipe, a cuál te refieres que tiene access=no? Puedo corregir, disculpa. Lo otro, edité el refugio habías cambiado porque noté que ya no se visualizaba como tal. Lo cree como un área para que se visualice también. En imágenes sat. no se ve pero debe ser porque solo tiene un año de antigüedad.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184286005
felipeeugenio (2026-06-18 23:30:36+00:00): Hola. Son varias las vías que has marcado con access=no (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1501423310, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457796527#map=16/-33.64789/-70.95275, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1525802258#map=15/-32.58137/-70.80225)

Esas son las que encontré dando una mirada rápida.

Access=yes igual es innecesario, es solo cuando se asume que no. Porfa revisa la wiki para ver los valores.

Con respecto al refugio, no sé bien a qué te refieres, pero por favor no mapear para que las cosas se vean de un modo u otro, eso es a lo que llamamos mapear para el render y es considerado una mala práctica.

Las cosas tienen que tener el valor que deben tener, no uno para que se vea bien. ¿A cuál refugio te refieres?

saludos
CrstblS (2026-06-19 00:44:49+00:00): Anteriormente Campamento Ramón, ahora es un Refugio. Se encuentra en el Cerro Caqui, Catemu, camino a Casa de Piedra. 

Lo menciono porque creo que lo modificaste y quedó con la etiqueta de "banca" o similar. Actualmente es un refugio con techo, cobijas, mesa y alacena.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184286005
CrstblS (2026-06-19 00:49:05+00:00): "Son varias las vías que has marcado con access=no", respecto a esto, me fijaré en todas las ediciones que he hecho y tienen dicho error. Gracias por avisar.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184286005
felipeeugenio (2026-06-19 11:57:27+00:00): ok, quizas lo del bench fue un typo, y el editor con que trabajo te autocompleta. pero en fin.

Lo que pasa es que un amenity=shelter es otra cosa, estás haciendo la traducción literal (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=shelter). SOn cmo las pergolas de las plazas.

El refugio del que hablas es mas bien un https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dwilderness_hut.

Saludos
Glassman (2026-06-18 21:56:38+00:00): From the imagery, these look like landuse=farmland. farmyard is the area around barns.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184286063
Langestreet (2026-06-18 22:18:20+00:00): Thanks.  Functionally, these are places where horses are grazing.  Please adjust per the conventions here.
Glassman (2026-06-18 22:51:14+00:00): Sounds like you want landuse=meadow. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dmeadow
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 04:55:42+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339235

https://osm.org/changeset/184339235
dknelson9876 (2026-06-20 03:11:58+00:00): Hello eaglespringspest, welcome to OSM, and mapping in Utah! We're happy to have you. For future reference, I want to make you aware of the following guidelines for OSM.

1. Avoid abbreviations. Because it's easy for a computer to abbreviate something, but not as easy to unabbreviate, we always aim to use full names (e.g. "North" over "N", "Drive" over "Dr"). For more, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations

2. Because of the unusual way we name streets here in Utah, we also have specific guidelines on a dedicated wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions. In short, this specific street rather than including the direction prefix in the name, it goes in a dedicated name:prefix=* key. Updating the whole state to match this is an ongoing effort, but I went ahead and did this block for you.

If you have any questions, don't be afraid to ask. You're also welcome to join other locals over in the #local-utah channel of the OSMUS Slack.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 04:56:07+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339240

https://osm.org/changeset/184339240
Frans S (2026-06-23 11:45:59+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A question  Why did you add a layer -1 to a building. 
It means that it is underground what it isn't .
Often this construction is done to hide an issue.  Just solve the issue.
Best regards
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-21 05:01:44+00:00): IN CYBERSPACE NO ONE CAN HEAR YOU SCREAM

SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186095707
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-06-19 14:12:05+00:00): Hi! here, the change makes routing for ATV or private employee vehicles impossible, because the link between both tracks is now only a cycleway with no default access for vehicles. I added atv=designated, but I don't think routing engines will even parse the cyleway tags at all for non-bicycle routing. Can you explain the rationale for the change? Thanks!
VLD277 (2026-06-23 18:16:31+00:00): Hello,

This modification was made in response to the pictogram on the side of the road showing a bicycle and a left turn arrow. Typically, this indicates that the intersection is designated for bicycles. After reviewing and factoring your concern, I have restored way 1530686862 to a track road and removed the crossing tags accordingly. The nodes have been retained to facilitate routing for both vehicle types. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.
SD Mapman (2026-06-22 21:11:10+00:00): Wouldn't the highway=motorway extend to the next at-grade intersection? That makes more sense than splitting the exit IMO. I could be wrong tho
Joseph R P (2026-06-22 23:30:16+00:00): I downgraded this short segment for two reasons—one being there is a sidewalk on the westbound side of Dodge Rd between 96th street and the exit ramp (which motorways generally shouldn't have), and the other being that the section between the ramps and the at-grade intersection is very short. From an on-the-ground perspective, you wouldn't be entering a freeway going from Regency Pkwy to Dodge Rd eastbound, or going west on Dodge Rd past the 96th St intersection and then taking the exit.
SD Mapman (2026-06-23 02:57:56+00:00): I guess I would disagree, having been through there a bunch (have family in the area). Plus, from an aesthetic standpoint it makes more sense to me to have the exit all one type of highway or another, but that's just my personal preference.

I don't see any documentation that sidewalks disqualify ways from highway=motorway here in the US but I could have missed it.

I pinged in an actual Nebraskan on Slack to be the tie-breaker FYI
SD Mapman (2026-07-01 03:35:22+00:00): So after discussion in the local-nebraska channel on Slack, it looks like the intent was to keep it motorway until 96th, which also follows the state-specific classification schematic (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Stretch_Longfellow/Nebraska_Highway_Classification). I have made the changes to match the 2021 classification page: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184891161
gurglypipe (2026-06-18 21:59:25+00:00): Wow that’s a lot of greenery 🤩
a-sav (2026-06-19 09:01:59+00:00): Sorry, should have broken down into smaller commits - got carried away!
gurglypipe (2026-06-19 09:22:24+00:00): No, this is fine! Big changesets (but still within one town/city) are fine as long as they’re all the same type of change (so are easy to check) :)

Thanks for all the work you’ve put into Barrow recently, it’s really made a difference to the map!
Hendrik Helsper (2026-06-18 20:31:49+00:00): Hier die Wiki-Seite zu dem Thema (für highways, aber analog auf andere proposed-features anwendbar): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=proposed?uselang=de

Außerdem die Diskussion im Forum (erster Post zu dem Thema am 17.06. um 1:28 Uhr)
dbsus (2026-06-25 07:18:40+00:00): Die Bahnhofsnummern (ref:station) bilden die Perspektive einer Station (Bahnhof, Haltepunkt) aus Sicht der Reisenden, aber auch der Eisenbahnverkehrsunternehmen (Stationshalte haben einen einheitlichen Preis je Bahnhofsnummer) ab und gehören daher als Attribut/Tag zu den Einzelstationen eines mehrteiligen Bahnhofs.
Entbert (2026-06-25 09:44:28+00:00): OK, wenn das so üblich ist, könnt ihr die Angaben gern wieder ergänzen.
ntableman (2026-06-18 21:30:34+00:00): https://fortress.wa.gov/dnr/fparsimages/apps804/fp2819804/fp2819804.pdf I drove these yesterday, will adjust as I can
grzegorz75jan (2026-06-19 10:13:11+00:00): Jeżeli zdjąłeś access=private to jaki sens jest dodania do tej drogi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299934986 foot=yes

Podobnie tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1382852313 dodanie access=yes jest bezcelowe ponieważ jeżeli nie ma restrykcji zakazu to dostęp jest w standardzie bez wpisywania.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Poland
Trzeba trochę poczytać o access, restrykcjach a trochę tego jest rozsiane tu i tam.
FroschForscher (2026-06-21 17:22:32+00:00): Hallo Koryos,
bei den Feldwegen zwischen Junkeräcker und Witzighausen hast du angegeben das keine Kfz dort fahren dürfen, also auch kein Land/Forstwirtschaftlichen Verkehr. Welche VZ hängen dort?

FroschForscher
Koryos (2026-06-21 18:50:25+00:00): Hallo,
Mein Fehler, natürlich sind Land- und Forstwirtschaft erlaubt.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-19 12:18:40+00:00): please, take look at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/zglaszanie-i-prosby-o-sprawdzenie-kont-edycji-uzytkownikow/110854/345

also, is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/352511132/history really a very long bridge?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-19 15:00:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1530701809 - why it is highway=unclassified ?
impact0r (2026-06-19 15:41:56+00:00): Hey. No idea about the bridge. I only changed the surface to Asphalt and maybe type of road.
impact0r (2026-06-19 15:47:10+00:00): The bridge thing might have got messed up during merging multiple small portions of the same road. Corrected. Regarding type of road, it's not just for the substation but also for the surrounding fields and river bank. Also, it's not a dead-end. It comes out the other end. That's my reasoning but am open to general consensus. Sometimes it's hard to differentiate.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-19 17:11:25+00:00): "but also for the surrounding fields and river bank" such road (land access) would be highway=track, so still not highway=unclassified
impact0r (2026-06-22 02:47:45+00:00): No. I meant this road leads to other roads which can be classified as "highway=track" - which I marked as such.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-23 15:04:06+00:00): Can you explain why you made https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1530701809 highway=unclassified  ?
impact0r (2026-06-23 15:14:00+00:00): Probably before I cut it into pieces. Fixing to driveway now.
Jarek 🚲 (2026-06-19 02:57:46+00:00): Hello,

You have changed *a lot* of road classifications that have been stable for a long time, without talking to anyone. Can you please explain the changes, what sort of "live navigation algorithmic deficiencies" you believe are happening, how you think your changes are addressing them, and why you think the previous classifications were not correct?

Please join us on the community forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/southern-ontario-road-classification-ongoing-thread/139281 (you can log in with your OSM account)
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-06-19 13:46:12+00:00): Hi! Please be careful, these sidewalks are not yet drawn separately, so you should not add sidewalk=separate to them yet. I removed the tag. Thanks!
VLD299 (2026-06-23 20:52:24+00:00): Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I appreciate your vigilance. I will ensure to monitor this more carefully moving forward.
eggie (2026-06-19 05:42:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-06-19 05:45:09+00:00): De naam heb ik aangepast.
In zo'n geval zoek je in alle regels de sleutel name=  op en vervangt de waarde in de nieuwe naam.
Pieter Jan van Hall (2026-06-25 13:42:53+00:00): Dank je eggie, voor je hupl en reactie!
Pieter Jan van Hall (2026-06-25 13:43:23+00:00): ik bedoel hulp ;)
Dimitar155 (2026-06-19 05:20:11+00:00): Здравейте и добре дошли в OpenStreetMap!

Благодаря ви за редакциите!

Имената на улиците ги пишем без "ул." и "улица" отпред, както и без кавички. За справка вижте всички улици в района.

Описателни имена от вида "metro path" и "restaurant" са нежелателни. Във втория случай, може да се добави възел с таг amenity=restaurant и в последствие да се допълни с името и работното време на ресторанта.

Адресите също се отбелязват както са структурирани полетата. В едното - името на улицата спрямо както е кръстена на картата, а в другото номера. Желателно е да бъде на български.

Имената на сградите (когато има такива) обикновено се слагат в addr:housename, тъй като по този начин ще се показва и адреса.

Оставам на разположение ако имате въпроси.

П.С. Името на ул. Лавандулова от къде е? Не намирам решение на Общинския съвет за именуването ѝ.

Поздрави,
Митко
Ivanov32ß039ß3 (2026-06-19 13:01:15+00:00): Здравейте, много благодаря за Вашето изключително любезно съобщение и конструктивната обратна връзка. Намирам това за много добре! Благодаря Ви, че поправихте грешките ми – сега вече знам какви са правилата и за в бъдеще. Ще изпратя доказателство за името на улицата (улична табела). Още веднъж много благодаря за помощта Ви. С уважение
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-18 22:08:23+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 183896352.
gurglypipe (2026-06-18 22:37:32+00:00): Thanks!
iMacThere4iAm (2026-06-19 05:55:16+00:00): Thank you! I only spotted this in passing in a car, I hadn't been back for a proper survey.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184291697
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-21 04:52:41+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1530715451

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
HellMap (2026-06-19 12:07:07+00:00): You are again adding incorrect fords and have not responded to previous messages. I am not going to be fixing your edits anymore as you are clearly ignoring the issue but continuing to mass-add features from AI detections and not fixing them afterwards. I have reverted the edits.
mapeditor11 (2026-06-19 16:43:47+00:00): Those edits were made based on LIDAR maps, not a single thing in these forests can be AI detected.
HellMap (2026-06-19 17:04:15+00:00): I have no idea how these changes are made because every other edit you make just says "edit, add places". And you clearly badly used AI for buildings before. If these are drawn manually, then that just means that you are making mistakes yourself. You did not even address the actual problem about fords. I already left you a detailed explanation before. It is your responsibility to not leave incorrect data and explain and source your changes correctly. Over years, you have mapped hundreds of features that did not appear correct even when checking against LIDAR and aerial. And I didn't even mention most of these minor issues. But no one is obligated to review and fix after your edits when you make major errors like breaking navigation. You have ignored every comment for months and years and not just about this issue.
BCNorwich (2026-06-21 06:46:45+00:00): Several fictional highways are removed
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-19 06:11:02+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the name real?
qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm (13951042165), v1
Marcilio Farias (2026-06-24 12:56:39+00:00): This is fake. It's not named that.
This appears to be a joke, an internet meme.
Marcilio Farias (2026-06-24 13:09:27+00:00): I removed the fake point in changeset 184522799.
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-19 06:10:44+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the name real?
a (13950992571), v1
okadatsuneo (2026-06-30 01:19:25+00:00): こんにちは。
OSMにようこそ。
多くの建物に"building:levels=2"と入れていますが、何の情報に基づいていますか？
不確実な情報は入れないで下さい。
よろしくお願いします。