piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2023-08-20 07:04:52+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140117553
eggie (2023-08-20 07:28:50+00:00): Boy Volgens het kadaster is de snackbar Schalkwijkseweg 30a
3998 LZ Schalkwijk..

Nr 1 zit ergens anders.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-08-20 07:32:17+00:00): Wanneer het niet klopt.. Er zijn nu twee verschillende adressen hier kun je opheldering vragen aan het Kadaster middels een terugmelding.
Doe je dat zelf
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Schalkwijkseweg+30a&objectId=0321200000023601&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=141626.274789133&geometry.y=444929.718483331&zoomlevel=15.712

MVG
eggie
spughetti (2023-08-20 16:38:25+00:00): Hi Matt! The imagery here shows a lot of trees around where the foot path was mapped. Did you confirm there wasn't a path here through an outdoor survey?
Matt_K_SF (2023-08-21 21:57:35+00:00): No I based this on the Google satellite view along with the official park map (https://ca-sanfranciscorecandparks.civicplus.com/DocumentCenter/View/138/McLaren-Park-Trail-Info-PDF?bidId=)
spughetti (2023-08-21 22:48:56+00:00): 😸👍
eggie (2023-08-20 07:07:16+00:00): Dag Boy.. 
Tip..
Je hoeft geen adressen toe te voegen aan OSM.. Er is al een adresnode hier.

MVG
eggie
Josef73 (2024-03-05 17:48:47+00:00): Hello, can you check the value of the tag opening_hours? Did you meen Tu-Su or Th-Su ? Thanks
HellMap (2023-08-21 07:54:43+00:00): Hi!

Just wanted to let you know that `surface=gravel` in OSM sense usually means "dense larger rocks". Roads like that in Latvia are actually very rare. Typical unpaved rural and remote roads (so-called "grunts" ceļi/"grantenes") are almost always `surface=compacted` - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dcompacted . It's not completely incorrect to tag it this way, but it does make surface values poorly usable for cases where it matters, like bicycles/wheelchairs/etc.

"Real" gravel roads look like this: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=795381835143910&focus=photo

Thanks
Mrborkander (2023-08-21 08:00:04+00:00): Understood. Will change tags accordingly. 

How would you classify this one? 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=57.2334696&lng=24.4087885&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=278391941388868&x=0.4812398339877999&y=0.5347576669293678&zoom=0
HellMap (2023-08-21 08:24:16+00:00): I almost always put `surface=compacted` on these. Here, there are only rare loose rocks. Personally, if one can bike there without rattling and sliding on rocks, then it's most likely not gravel.

To elaborate, there are very few roads that have actual gravel on them, because cars very quickly compact, break and disperse the rocks. Such gravel roads last no more than a season before becoming like this example. In general, I wouldn't put `gravel` until most of the road is actually covered in rocks and they move as you step/bike/drive on them. Basically - rocks are touching each other and forming a layer.

Of course, this becomes difficult because many roads do indeed start with a gravel layer, but soon turn into what you see here. This is why a lot of mappers do put gravel everywhere if they see any rocks. As I mentioned - not completely incorrect, but also not that useful for data consumers.

To give you a more complex example, https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=177516025291859 This road was repaired by adding a layer of rocks in potholes and the traffic here isn't high enough to turn it into uniform road. Is this gravel? Who knows :) I would probably agree that `gravel` here is okay despite only being in patches and I think most mappers would indeed use `gravel` here. But this will eventually turn into `compacted` unless regularly maintained.

I think I have only seen "full" gravel that lasted more than a summer may be a few times around Saulkrasti and it was someone just placing rocks in front of their property to avoid dust or water buildup or for temporary access like construction vehicles. For example, https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=577720461150720 At the intersection, you can already see that rocks are getting crushed and turning into a more uniform mass.
Mrborkander (2023-08-21 08:52:45+00:00): Great summary. As always, thank you for in-depth explanation and help. Great work!
map per (2023-08-23 17:39:07+00:00): Hallo maxwxyz,

mir ist aufgefallen, das die Restaurants bei (1) und (2) schon als Node vorhanden waren und jezt doppelt eingezeichnet sind. Bitte da die Duplikate wieder löschen.

Danke und viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/189251941
(2) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/189251951
maxwxyz (2023-08-24 08:19:58+00:00): Erl.
map per (2023-08-24 12:42:50+00:00): Danke!
DrSegatron (2023-08-22 17:08:27+00:00): When mapping in Sweden, use:

https://minkarta.lantmateriet.se/map/ortofoto/wms/v1.3?LAYERS=Ortofoto_0.5,Ortofoto_0.4,Ortofoto_0.25,Ortofoto_0.16&EXCEPTIONS=application/vnd.ogc.se_xml&FORMAT=image/png&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&STYLES=default,default,default,default&SERVICE=WMS&VERSION=1.1.1&REQUEST=GetMap&SRS={proj}&BBOX={bbox}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}
Reza Babri (2023-08-21 09:20:47+00:00): Thanks
ali-14 (2023-08-26 05:51:08+00:00): سلام، روز بخیر
شما در تغییراتی که اعمال کردید نود جاده ساری- دامغان با آیدی 8763796223 رو جا به جا کردید و از مسیر اصلی خارج کردید. 
لطفا در جابه جایی نودها دقت کنید.
farhad_y (2023-08-26 06:11:11+00:00): سلام
من در حال اصلاح مرز تقسیمات کشوری هستم
احتمالا این نود به اشتباه در ریلیشن های مرز تقسیمات بوده
ممنون بابت تذکرتون
eggie (2023-08-20 07:08:25+00:00): Helemaal oke zo op de adresnode. Even CTRL-f5 voor het effect.
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2023-08-20 07:33:51+00:00): Hi Capa   What's de hotelname?

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2023-08-20 07:37:24+00:00): I added the hotelname Mennorode.. but perhaps you did so at the samen time.
Greetz,
eggie
capa77 (2023-08-21 05:01:12+00:00): Hi. This is right. It’s Mennorode Hotel 

Regards
Bulest (2023-08-28 10:02:31+00:00): Bonjour,

Pourquoi avez-vous annulé mes modifications ?
L'A83 est bien une autoroute, même qu'elle est limitée à 90, voyez sur Wikipédia : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autoroute_A83_(France) l'autoroute commence à la fin du Bd de Vendée.

Cordialement,

Bulest
Carto'Cité (2023-08-28 10:52:13+00:00): Bonjour,

J'ai annulé parce que cette section est une voie rapide, mentionnée par les panneaux C107, et les panneaux de début/fin d'autoroute au nord du péage du Bignon, ici pour être exact : https://www.osm.org/node/26589548

A la réflexion, peut-être que tout laisser en autoroute a du sens. Je vais y réfléchir ce soir.
StephaneP (2023-08-28 10:52:54+00:00): Oups ! J'étais connecté avec le mauvais compte utilisateur. C'est bien moi qui ai répondu au-dessus.
StephaneP (2023-09-27 09:45:56+00:00): Hello,

Bon, j'y ai réfléchi, sans réussir à me décider. J'ai posé la question à d'autres contributeurs, et la balance penche du côté de highway=trunk.

Si tu as des arguments qui pourraient refaire pencher la balance de l'autre côté, je suis à ton écoute.

Stéphane
eggie (2023-08-20 08:25:29+00:00): Dag Boy.. Je hoeft geen adressen aan te maken. gebruik de bestaande adresnode. Ik heb je info samengevoegd.
De openingstijden Di-Su 09:00 - 18:00 heb ik aangepast naar OSM format.
Tu-Su 09:00 - 18:00

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-08-20 08:18:00+00:00): Beste Boy... Je hebt het gebouwe verwijderd.  Waarom?

Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140120172

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-08-20 08:27:53+00:00): Het gebouw heb ik hersteld.
chris66 (2024-05-17 12:48:52+00:00): Hi,
stehen dort Schilder "Fahrradstraße" oder ist es nur ein aufgemaltes Piktogramm?

Ein Auto-Routing ist dort zur Zeit nicht möglich wegen dem vehicle=no.

Grüße
pza (2023-11-27 09:03:21+00:00): I was just fixing up some broken layers, and noticed the two buildings under Western Distributor had layer=1. I was about to remove the tag as I can't see any reason for it. Do you remember why you added it in this changeset? I don't see any reason why the implicit layer=0 is a problem.
ElliottPlack (2023-11-17 04:24:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144121471 where the changeset comment is: reverting nonsense maps.me edits Ticket#2023101310000047
Silva1989 (2023-08-31 17:46:52+00:00): Hello!
I've noticed you added a place of worship on the water at Horta Marina. Was it a mistake?
I'm pretty sure that place of worship doesn't exist, at least not there.
Have you found a place to pray at the marina building for instance?
Thanks
ElliottPlack (2023-11-17 04:24:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144121471 where the changeset comment is: reverting nonsense maps.me edits Ticket#2023101310000047
ElliottPlack (2023-11-17 04:24:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144121471 where the changeset comment is: reverting nonsense maps.me edits Ticket#2023101310000047
Dimitar155 (2023-08-20 19:40:04+00:00): Редакцията е върната, виж предните коментари.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140149205
Sandal man (2023-08-20 14:58:11+00:00): Hello,
please make smalle changesets, this helps others in tracking changes. 

Thank you.
ElliottPlack (2023-11-17 04:23:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144121471 where the changeset comment is: reverting nonsense maps.me edits Ticket#2023101310000047
ElliottPlack (2023-11-17 04:24:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144121471 where the changeset comment is: reverting nonsense maps.me edits Ticket#2023101310000047
ElliottPlack (2023-11-17 04:23:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144121471 where the changeset comment is: reverting nonsense maps.me edits Ticket#2023101310000047
ElliottPlack (2023-11-17 04:23:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144121471 where the changeset comment is: reverting nonsense maps.me edits Ticket#2023101310000047
gscscnd (2023-08-20 10:56:52+00:00): Jeszcze crossing=zebra jeśli nie masz nic przeciwko. Ogólnie, jeśli nie masz nic przeciwko, w JOSM można/mogę dość szybko wyłapać i poprawić wszystkie takie przypadki w mieście.
Hanys1871 (2023-08-21 13:19:37+00:00): Jeśli usunę crossing=zebra to rodzaj przejścia zmieni się z oznakowanego na ogólne. Wg mnie lepiej zostawić.
gscscnd (2023-08-25 07:42:57+00:00): Odsyłam jeszcze do <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123207246>, ale spróbuję nieco inaczej to opisać, bo chyba nie udało mi się wyjaśnić, co miałem na myśli.

Nasze przejście dla pieszych składa się z dwóch obiektów: węzła highway=crossing (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3172588355) oraz linii highway=footway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444636574). Węzeł mamy oznaczony tagami: highway=crossing, crossing=uncontrolled, crossing:markings=zebra; prawidłowo. Linię mamy oznaczoną tagami: highway=footway, footway=crossing, bicycle=dismount, surface=asphalt; ten ostatni jest nieco nieprecyzyjny, ale jest prawidłowo, przydałoby się jeszcze np. lit=* i width=*. Coś celowo pominąłem.

W moim opisie zabrakło tagu crossing=zebra na drodze. Chciałbym, żeby tego tagu na drodze nie było, ponieważ tradycyjnie jest on używany na węzłach highway=crossing i w ten sposób przejście dla pieszych (którego głównym elementem jest ten węzeł wspólny dla drogi dla samochodów i drogi dla pieszych) jest już szczegółowo opisane, nie potrzeba duplikować tagu crossing=* na drodze dla pieszych. Ona jest już oznaczona footway=crossing, więc wiadomo, że to droga przechodząca przez przejście/przejścia. (Dla DDR itp. zamiast footway=crossing można użyć path=crossing.)
ElliottPlack (2023-11-17 04:23:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144121471 where the changeset comment is: reverting nonsense maps.me edits Ticket#2023101310000047
dpolovinkin (2023-08-21 18:40:01+00:00): я не делаю правки на территории Украины, только неверные переводы на территории РФ
BCNorwich (2023-08-21 07:44:18+00:00): Hi, Your new highway duplicates the highway that it is mapped over, this can disrupt routing. It is OSM practice to correct/amend existing features when necessary rather than adding new features or mapping over the existing feature. Thus the new cycleway should be removed and the existing footpath tags be amended/corrected.

I've therefore removed three sections of highway that duplicated existing highways and amended the tagging of the original feature to a cycleway.

Regards Bernard.
thecraftyrider (2023-09-17 07:33:35+00:00): Good morning. Thank you for taking the time to review and make these changes. Whilst I have made a handful of contributions to OpenStreetMap. This is the first one I have had reviewed. Do you think my other contributions need to be retrospectively reviewed also (if they can be)?
BCNorwich (2023-09-17 12:38:52+00:00): Hi, I've had a look at all your changesets from the last year, with one exception they look OK. The exception is your last changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140123569
The cycleway was not joined to the overall network of highways. Thus it would be ignored as far as routing is concerned, (you could not get onto it from the rest of the highway network, nor off once on it).  So I've joined the cycleway to the road at each end where it looks like the cycleway crosses the road.

Need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
ElliottPlack (2023-11-17 04:25:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144121471 where the changeset comment is: reverting nonsense maps.me edits Ticket#2023101310000047
ElliottPlack (2023-11-17 04:23:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144121471 where the changeset comment is: reverting nonsense maps.me edits Ticket#2023101310000047
ElliottPlack (2023-11-17 04:24:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144121471 where the changeset comment is: reverting nonsense maps.me edits Ticket#2023101310000047
trigpoint (2023-08-20 10:23:06+00:00): Please don't do that. The park certainly doesn't end at the centreline of the path.
It either stops where it did, or should have been extended to end the other side of that path.

Glueing landuse to the centreline of highways just makes editing more difficult for other mappers.

Cheers Phil
flohoff (2023-08-21 09:56:42+00:00): Moin,
gestern ist da irgendwas kaputt gegangen an dem Kreuz A2/A33 - Das routing ist ziemlich groß geschwenkt und SEHR viel langsamer geworden weil die leute jetzt durch Ummeln geschickt werden:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=399556,502262#

Flo
mavl (2023-08-30 06:18:44+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет огромный луг. Судя по спутниковым снимкам, на этом месте месте находятся другие объекты, такие как города.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_practice
EricTheLinguist (2023-08-30 05:12:43+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140520187

This is an advertisement and not a suitable listing for OSM.
ElliottPlack (2023-11-17 04:23:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144121471 where the changeset comment is: reverting nonsense maps.me edits Ticket#2023101310000047
kmpoppe (2024-02-10 06:18:33+00:00): Hallo wuff57,

mit diesem Satz hast du die Maximalgeschwindigkeit der K 1001 in "Mauren" von 100 auf 30 geändert. Ein anderer Nutzer schreibt in seinem Tagebucheintrag (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Ralf1104/diary/403463), dass diese Beschränkung nicht korrekt sei.

Kannst du bitte einen Kommentar zu dem Tagebucheintrag hinterlassen, wie es zu dieser Änderung gekommen ist?

Vielen Dank!
wuff57 (2024-02-12 15:48:46+00:00): Hallo Kai, danke, dass Du mich drauf aufmerksam gemacht hast. Das ist eindeutig mein Fehler. Habe mir heute die Stelle nochmal angeschaut und gerade entsprechend verbessert.
felipeeugenio (2023-08-20 12:09:27+00:00): Hola Cristian. Gracias por sus ediciones, al parecer conoce mucho o trabaja en esto.
No obstante el concepto de bus station está equivocado en la mayaría de los cambios que hizo. una estación de buses es un lugar donde los pasajeros toman buses. Veo que cambió el concepto de depot por bus_station en casi todo lo que editó. Muchos de estos lugares son solo donde los buses tienen su centro logístico. No donde se atiende público.

Le agradecemos por favor revisar la wiki para averiguar mejor sobre los tags que usa y, si lo desea, unirse al chat de la comunidad OSM Chile en donde se pueden conversar estos temas. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbus_station)

en link del chat es el https://t.me/OSMcl. Está invitado desde ya.

Por lo pronto voy a intentar solucionar lo que hizo de manera rápida.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140123720
Taktaal (2023-08-22 14:40:19+00:00): by the way, a cliff can't be an area, by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=cliff it needs to be a line
timmito (2023-08-20 14:01:40+00:00): Hallo tux67, ich hatte mir schon fast gedacht, dass du aus dem landuse=construction das amenity=fire_station machen willst, du hattest aber beim Erstellen des landuse den Namen am Gebäude gelassen und die amenity ist jetzt immer noch ohne Namen. Ein amenity=fire_station ohne weitere Attribute ist unüblich. Name, Adresse und Betreiber gehören dazu.

Beim Namen bin ich übrigens ein bisschen unglücklich darüber, dass nojahs diesen in Abkürzungen (FF LE) geändert hat. Dafür ist eigentlich short_name da. Das Problem scheint aber Heinsberg-weit zu bestehen, deshalb habe ich das erstmal so gelassen.
tux67 (2023-08-20 14:20:44+00:00):  Ja, das hatte ich vergessen, die Daten rüberzuziehen. Werde ich noch nachziehen, wenn du mir nicht zuvorkommst. ;-) Das.mit den Namen hab ich mir allerdings nicht ausgedacht.

k.A. ob hier jemand mitmappt, der die Feuerwehren im Kreis vertritt.

Gruß
Tux67
ElliottPlack (2023-11-17 04:23:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144121471 where the changeset comment is: reverting nonsense maps.me edits Ticket#2023101310000047
Mathias_ADAV (2023-09-20 09:56:47+00:00): Bonjour,

concernant cette jonction ainsi que les  chemins le long de l'avenue de Grande Bretagne, il faudrait indiquer qu'ils sont utilisable à vélo même si la réglementation n'est pas clair.

En effet, les traversées au giratoire sont bien marqué pour les cycles, il y donc bien une continuité logique.
hlfan (2024-08-07 08:13:19+00:00): I've seen this street's name spelled with a hyphen between given and surname (in the BEV addresses and basemap.at) and without (on the street sign itself), but never with a hyphen after the Dr. degree. Which of your sources have the name spelled fully hyphenated?
Ropino (2023-09-30 10:23:59+00:00): Hi,
please check/correct:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1200290633
"highway=access" ?
"access" is not a highway-type:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
thx in advance
Minh Nguyen (2023-10-09 15:59:52+00:00): This changeset discarded a more precise Wikidata item in favor of a less precise one based on a Wikipedia article that covers multiple topics. The topics are covered in a single article because the individual topics are not considered notable enough by Wikipedia standards. To prevent this issue from arising in the future, the relevant Wikidata items have all been edited to be instances of https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21484471 or have intentional sitelinks to redirects on Wikipedia.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142356249
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-10 07:26:06+00:00): Thanks!
Liqid1010 (2024-09-24 18:16:07+00:00): Dobrý deň. Môžem sa opýtať aký zmysel má dávať toľko vecí do relácií multipolygónov? Je to neskutočne neprehľadné a myslím si, že dosť zbytočné (vznikne plno krátkych čiar a dve veľké relácie, namiesto pár veľkých čitateľných plôch). Tiež pre to napríklad celý kruhový objazd bol zelený a špecifické oblasti, ktoré tam už boli (neviem či od Vás) nebolo ani vidno. Multipoplygóny používam skoro výhradne len pre nespojité oblasti, alebo oblasti s dierami.
Frans S (2023-08-20 12:08:39+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140126166
Sandal man (2023-08-20 14:38:09+00:00): Hello,
please make smalle changesets, this helps others in tracking changes. 

Thank you.
hrhino (2023-08-20 20:13:38+00:00): Also, please don't add anything which could be seen as personal information, such as "Kiki's house", unless that's actually a vacation apartment named such (which I doubt). Thanks!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-20 10:28:50+00:00): are you sure it is name=Petrol, not name=Crodux ?

Is it based on survey?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-24 11:44:34+00:00): send PM ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/messages/1226879 )
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-30 13:17:52+00:00): Got reply that these got "Petrol" signs. 
----
Not sure is "Crodux" signed at all there.

So: is name "Crodux" signed there?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-09 10:18:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193053145/history - sa jakieś pozostałości tego toru w terenie? Jeśli tak - to jakie?
eggie (2023-08-20 19:18:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
mike140 (2024-05-03 20:25:41+00:00): Там точно є круговий рух? Є відповідні знаки?: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1200333169
nyoma (2024-05-05 12:37:13+00:00): Так, 100%. Буваю там кожного дня
elsy1 (2023-08-20 13:06:39+00:00): با چه دیدگاهی این جاده ها را به ترانک تغییر دادید میشه لطفا توضیح دهید وگرنه کار شما فرقی با خرابکاری در نقشه ندارد
fariborzsepanta (2023-08-26 09:50:59+00:00): جاده بین بخشی و شهرستانی است و رفت و امد زیاد... 
شما این واژه خرابکاری را تازه یاد گرفتید 
مدام تکرارش می کنید؟
fariborzsepanta (2023-08-26 10:16:13+00:00): چرا جاده ی دیلمان را اینقدر تغییر می 
دهید؟!
elsy1 (2023-08-26 15:01:47+00:00): درود، چون از نظر فنی این کار فرقی با خرابکاری ندارد و این جاده ها اصلا پرایمری نیستند مثل اینکه شما سطح این جاده را هم سطح با جاده قزوین - رشت قرار بدید و جدا از این ویرایش شما پر از خطا هست از خیابان هایی که به جاده متصل نشده اند و شما فقط اقدام به ثبت این ویرایشی ها میکنید  لطفا قبل از ثبت ویرایش مطالعه کافی درباره نوع تگ ها و رفع خطا ها داشته باشید تشکر.
elsy1 (2023-08-26 15:04:17+00:00): مثال جاده بره سر - لوشان را تگ پرایمری زدید در حالی که اصلا و ابدا نوع این جاده حتی در حد جاده درجه دو هم نیست
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-20 11:20:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1200338945

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
elsy1 (2023-08-20 12:57:48+00:00): درود، شما بسیاری از جاده ای هایی که درجه پایینی از اهمیت را دارند به تگ ترانک تعییر دادید لطفا قبل از ویرایش و اعمال تغییرات مطالعه لازم را در اینباره انجام دهید.
elsy1 (2023-08-20 13:26:49+00:00): اکثر ویرایش هایتون مشکل داره شما به جاده خاکی فرعی تگ ترانک دادید! بنده اکثر ویرایش های غلط شما را برگشت دادم اگر فکر میکنید جای بحث داره به کامنت پاسخ دهید.
rskedgell (2026-05-03 08:33:51+00:00): That's what access tags, specifically foot=customers, are for. They're definitely not "pavements" (not adjacent to a road), or highway=pedestrian (they're not streets).

Tagging repaired in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182148136
Langlaeufer (2023-08-20 12:18:27+00:00): Frag mich nur ob das mit den 70 Absicht war oder jemand nach der Baustelle versehentlich die alten Schilder rausgeholt hat ...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140129310