piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2025-10-04 08:44:59+00:00): accesstags aangepast.  access=no verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
resitive (2025-10-05 10:49:02+00:00): Dag eggie,

Het is een onverhard voetpad wat voornamelijk door hondenbezitters wordt gebruikt. Staat geen bord bij, maar is verder dus geen fietspad. 
Bedankt voor oplettendheid
resitive (2025-10-05 10:52:34+00:00): Vandaar ook eerst als infomal path ingezet.
eggie (2025-10-05 10:56:55+00:00): Hoi... Denk dat het zo wel oke is.
.. informal=yes is meer voor paden die door gebruik ontstaan. Bv een olifantenpaadje.
Mapse..
eggie
resitive (2025-10-05 11:03:35+00:00): thx, jij ook
barley383 (2025-10-03 22:55:01+00:00): ajout d'email avec osmose, mise a jour de commerces sur Cours de la Libération et du Général de Gaulle

source: osmose, panoramax 2025-09-28
真中あお (2026-05-08 09:28:13+00:00): 您好，欢迎您来到osm~
但需要指出，您对在建地铁站的编辑存在问题。
首先，在建的车站和运行中的车站，在osm上的标注方法是不同的。运行中的车站，表示方法是添加
public_transport=station、railway=station这两个标签，而在建的车站不能添加上述标签，而应该添加加了前缀的标签：construction:public_transport=station和construction:railway=station
再者，上述代表一整个车站的标签不是加在轨道上的，而是标为一个单独的点，或加在代表整个车站轮廓的区域上。（实际上之前编辑19号线的编辑者的确已经把相应标签加在车站轮廓上了），而您看到其他编辑者点轨道上的点，意思是列车到站时的停车处（参见：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_position )，而不是代表车站本身，也不应该把代表车站的标签加在上边。
另外，正如前面所说，已开通的和在建的站点有不同的标签，因此填写名称时也不需要添加括号写建设中。
我已经把宝山路的标签修正了，您也可以参照看看。
最后，我们很多编辑者都在290278518这个qq群交流，也欢迎您来~
真中あお (2026-05-08 09:29:52+00:00): 修正前一条评论自动转换链接导致的问题，我是想写：
…… public_transport=station、railway=station 这两个标签，而在建的车站不能添加上述标签，而应该添加加了前缀的标签：public_transport=station 和construction:railway=station
……
真中あお (2026-05-08 09:30:32+00:00): 还是没对，是修正前一条评论自动转换链接导致的问题，我是想写：
…… public_transport=station 、railway=station 这两个标签，而在建的车站不能添加上述标签，而应该添加加了前缀的标签：public_transport=station 和construction:railway=station
真中あお (2026-05-08 09:39:53+00:00): 我是想说把铁山路地铁站的标签修正了，之前打错了（
InsertUser (2025-10-04 02:16:23+00:00): I don't have a strong opinion on this, but I do think this feature has much broader recognition than Null Island.
ZeLonewolf (2025-10-04 02:27:51+00:00): By all means open a forum discussion.
Thierry1030 (2025-12-27 07:48:42+00:00): bicycle=no ipv foot=no :-)
campbelltree (2025-10-04 04:16:41+00:00): Hey there, thanks for your first contribution! This all looks good to me.
quincylvania (2025-12-09 14:47:20+00:00): Hi archiarch111, welcome to OSM. Seems like you were experimenting with mapping here, but accidentally removed some of the tagging information. I fixed the issue for you. I encourage you to read more about OSM before making more edits: https://learnosm.org/ Let me know if you have any questions!
-Q
Ducminhduongcb (2025-10-06 14:05:59+00:00): ok nhưng sao bn lại xoá hết ranh giới v để tôi tự sủa đc mà
Ducminhduongcb (2025-10-06 14:06:18+00:00): *sửa
campbelltree (2025-10-04 04:13:16+00:00): name=access is incorrect, just make them service roads (driveways?) with no name. The previous names look correct, I'm reverting all the names that look like they were good data.
campbelltree (2025-10-04 04:24:09+00:00): I reverted this change, name=access is never correct and the previous road names look legitimate. Additionally, driveways are approximately destination access by default and don't need access tags unless there's something special. If you're sure this is correct, please also tag the physical barriers that make these roads truly private access (this seems unlikely due to how South Drive is laid out).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172815616
ErikvRo (2025-10-04 04:28:43+00:00): Hm, I did not intend to add/change name, only access. Not sure what I did wrong here, I'll try again.
OilStation (2025-11-07 14:18:00+00:00): 个人建议：如果某个对象有name:en但缺少name，不必非要复制粘贴，硬给它填上。
sai_penke (2025-11-07 12:44:04+00:00): Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap! Please download  JOSM or  iD editor to find the existing data to avoid making duplicate edits.

highway=footway should be used for the highways that are used mainly or exclusively by pedestrians. If there is a highway and it's not restricted for pedestrians, you can add the foot=yes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:foot%3Dyes) tag in the future. Happy Mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172814217
sai_penke (2025-11-07 12:44:19+00:00): Hi, 
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap! Please download  JOSM or  iD editor to find the existing data to avoid making duplicate edits.

highway=footway should be used for the highways that are used mainly or exclusively by pedestrians. If there is a highway and it's not restricted for pedestrians, you can add the foot=yes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:foot%3Dyes) tag in the future. Happy Mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172814217
sai_penke (2025-11-07 12:44:31+00:00): Hi, 
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap! Please download  JOSM or  iD editor to find the existing data to avoid making duplicate edits.

highway=footway should be used for the highways that are used mainly or exclusively by pedestrians. If there is a highway and it's not restricted for pedestrians, you can add the foot=yes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:foot%3Dyes) tag in the future. Happy Mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172814217
Coehill (2025-10-06 16:32:12+00:00): Thank you!
TomekB_ (2025-10-04 15:08:38+00:00): I think that's very wrong. it's probably not a grief, because it's your 1st edit, so you are learning, I'm just saying it's for 99% wrong, so for 99% you should revert it (just delete those "buildings").
NeisBot (2025-10-04 04:03:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-12 05:22:24+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172852371
HAALAND_ (2026-03-04 05:17:17+00:00): Hi，Wong Ruozheng
请不要在“name”标签内添加非当地语言，这里是中国大陆北京市 所以“name”标签内应该添加简体中文而不是英文。
warudo (2025-10-13 03:07:50+00:00): Is it a real place?
b-jazz (2025-10-20 16:26:39+00:00): Hey wadenick, looks like you are doing a lot of great work. However, I did come across this one bunker (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1435238413) that seems to have been ignored as you were drawing the fairway and crossed over it. Seeing how all of the other bunkers here are correct, I'm guessing this was just a mistake.
wadenick (2025-10-20 16:32:16+00:00): Thanks! Just an early mistake. Popped in a fix.
b-jazz (2025-10-20 16:33:53+00:00): You're the best! Thanks.
felipeeugenio (2025-10-04 11:29:05+00:00): Hola Paul.
De dónde proviene la información con la que cambiaste el nombre del camino K-353? Aparece así en los registros del MOP.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172815853
felipeeugenio (2025-10-04 11:33:30+00:00): en el tag old_ref estaba ya el K-611. El nombre y rol que agregaste son los antiguos.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172815853
user_18023081 (2025-10-19 17:41:25+00:00): ???
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-04 05:51:04+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13015094297

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-04 06:31:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098057443

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
aharvey (2025-11-12 02:20:42+00:00): I've reverted and repaired this changeset.
Glassman (2025-10-04 23:34:20+00:00): Geometry has a interesting to represent objects inside of another. Check out mulipolygons. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon. Basically you create a polygon (area) around the building and another around the parking lot. Then select both areas, right click, select the + to create a multipolygon. When in the editor, see help on relations.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172817009
Ilo S1lly (2025-10-05 00:11:55+00:00): ah thank you! i'll tidy up the gas station in some time but otherwise have found what seems to be a cleaner solution for the urgent care anyway. thank you for that though! i felt like there had to be a more accurate/convenient way to do that, i'll use it in the future. appreciated!
John “Brian” Peterson (2025-11-07 12:13:58+00:00): Here is the rest of the message is was cut off

the bridge is gone  only remnant logs left . track over grown disused impassable by thick brush .

neighbours might have fallen out over disagreement and never walk to each other anymore and abandoned track connecting adjacent farms.

nearest farm from west was angry I was there. confronted me with guard dog and yelled in incomprehensible language. drove after me in Volvo and honked at me to drive me away like cattle. typical Finland expedition
kuhni74 (2025-10-30 14:50:39+00:00): Why did you delete wikidata items? this information is very useful in my humble opinion.
Fraxi (2025-10-04 10:28:52+00:00): Здравейте! 
Хубаво е, че сте добавили паркинга и реагирали по бележката, но не е необходимо паркинга да се именува с name=/name:en=/loc_name=. Другите тагове, които сте добавили носят достатъчно информация.
Повече може да видите на: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
Anonymous36863 (2025-10-04 14:26:07+00:00): Извинете.
Fraxi (2025-10-04 16:17:41+00:00): Не се притеснявайте. Сигурно всеки е бил така в началото :). Просто можете да четете от посоченото wiki и да се запознаете как се практикува обичайно.
Dimitar155 (2025-10-07 18:52:56+00:00): Потвърждавам казаното от Fraxi. Като направих моите първи 400-500 промени, прегледах най-първите си и се чудех какви съм ги вършил :).
EzyPup (2025-10-04 20:21:19+00:00): Fair
jSeke (2026-01-30 13:01:01+00:00): Cill MoLuaig in gàidhlig has a capital L in the middle of it.
Hufkratzer (2025-10-05 20:22:01+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1435251240 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1435251242 don't look like riding centers, they look like riding arenas (similar to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651759043). Maybe they belong to a riding center which in this case can be mapped as a separate object (node or area), example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1421250337#map=17/35.226117/-113.997386&layers=P . See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
NieWnen (2025-10-04 14:33:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1074290098

Przejazd na ulicy z kostki stał się asfaltowy?
NieWnen (2025-10-25 17:34:03+00:00): Nie. Jest z kostki jak był :) Zmiana cofnięta.
joost schouppe (2025-11-04 16:04:45+00:00): Volgens https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111498924 is deze kerk niet meer in gebruik. Ik zie daar wel geen bron voor. Ben jij zeker dat ze nog in gebruik is?
Rik007 (2025-11-04 16:47:47+00:00): Dag Joost, is het wel opportuun om kerken niet meer als kerk te taggen, enkel omdat ze niet meer actief gebruikt worden? Het blijven wel kerkgebouwen, landmarks op de kaart, waar iedereen zich kan op oriënteren.
Anders moeten we ook overal de Kerkstraat een andere naam geven omdat er geen "kerk" meer instaat...
Groetjes, Rik
joost schouppe (2025-11-05 10:43:27+00:00): Het blijft wel degelijk een kerk: building=church.
amenity=place_of_worship betekent gewoon "A place where religious services are conducted."
Een kerk die ontwijd is voldoet m.i. niet meer aan dat criterium.
NeisBot (2025-10-04 07:06:38+00:00): Hi Abin_Shaji, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Removed address, building levels, and name details from a residential house"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
joost schouppe (2025-11-04 16:06:24+00:00): Je hebt deze aangeduid als amenity & dezelfde disused:amenity. Volgens mijn research een paar jaar geleden is deze niet meer in gebruik, en dus geen amenity=place_of_worship meer. Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113946523
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-10-04 11:35:18+00:00): Hi! Icontacted you guys some tim ago. Please do not cahnge transition tag and change the number of lanes, please follow the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes

When there is placement=transition, you should keep the width:lanes:end/width:lanes:start and put the right number of lanes. Thanks!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-10-04 11:37:04+00:00): Please contact your whole team so I do not have to revert multiple times. Thanks! Sorry for the typos in the previous message! Have a nice day!
Lkumar_lyft (2025-10-06 12:19:28+00:00): Hi, ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy,
My name is Lalit, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. We deeply apologize for publishing such changes after our previous discussion with you, and for the inconvenience caused by having to correct our changesets. We will thoroughly review everything we published in October to ensure that no incorrect changesets remain. Once again, we sincerely apologize for this oversight. Thank you for addressing it.
We've informed our team to be mindful of placement tags and similar scenarios moving forward.

Best regards,
Lalit
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-10-06 12:30:32+00:00): Thanks!
DMMeYourCurbCuts (2025-10-24 01:58:21+00:00): Hi there. You requested a review of this edit. Adding business nodes to roads/service roads is not the way to do things, and Google Maps is not a valid source. Please familiarize yourself with how to edit OpenStreetMap before editing.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

I'll be undoing these changes.
NeisBot (2025-10-04 07:26:28+00:00): Hi Anugrah Solomon, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added hospital amenity, healthcare attributes, updated name to Neethi Lab, removed building tag"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
eggie (2025-10-04 07:47:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Wanneer een bedrijf verhuist zal het oude adres gewoon achterblijven. Svp alleen de bedrijfsinfo verwijderen en op de nieuwe locatie weer samenvoegen met de adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 13:29:51+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13191986818/history has shop = Ganesh Store that was added in this edit
shop=Ganesh Store ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
eggie (2025-10-04 07:51:56+00:00): Sam. 

Hier klopte de postcode niet. 
Ik heb de info samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode.

MVG
eggie
literan (2025-10-04 09:30:06+00:00): а почему не https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddancing_school ?
solenoid jam (2025-10-04 10:03:18+00:00): там только залы под аренду
literan (2025-10-04 10:47:41+00:00): тогда зачем amenity=training?))

это скорее lesure=dance или как там оно
solenoid jam (2025-10-05 05:40:48+00:00): Да, действительно. Я поправлю
eggie (2025-10-04 07:56:50+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,
Svp geen adresnodes veranderen. Ik heb deze hersteld en de bakkerij samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
De postcode klopte niet.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=172819160

MVG
eggie
Yog Sot (2025-10-04 09:38:28+00:00): how did you made that survey across 1000 kilometers?
landscapemapper (2025-10-04 21:07:16+00:00): Yeah. I did survey all of them personally but was not aware that the first one still waa stuck in the pipeline. I am very sorry.
Gregory Peony (2025-10-07 01:54:55+00:00): Hello, I do not think that these are isolated dwellings, becasue they are only a few tens of meters apart. Even if you don't map a residential area I would generally map a situation like this with a single place node as in https://osmcha.org/changesets/172938627  Consider which places are likely to have their own names and settlement type/distribution. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172819360
user_5359 (2025-10-15 10:21:06+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2dHQ. What ist the mean of the tag funnel=yes?
user_5359 (2025-11-08 13:06:23+00:00): Здравствуйте! Пожалуйста, загляните на сайт https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2dHQ. Что означает тег funnel=yes?
user_5359 (2025-11-17 09:13:18+00:00): Hello (again)! Please visit https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2dHQ. What does the tag funnel=yes mean? Did you mean natural=sinkhole?

Здравствуйте (снова)! Пожалуйста, посетите https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2dHQ. Что означает тег funnel=yes? Вы имели в виду natural=sinkhole?
RimjobJoe (2025-10-05 04:36:50+00:00): Ja!
osmviborg (2025-10-04 08:16:06+00:00): Hvis bygningen ikke længere er synlig på Ortofoto, så slet den. removed:building er kun relevant hvis den er synlig på Ortofoto; men du er vidende om at den er fjernet.
Linus W Frische (2025-10-04 08:30:40+00:00): Godt spottet, er rettet nu :)
Macie33k (2025-10-04 20:33:34+00:00): jeśli uznajemy, że tory wykorzystywane do zjazdów z i do zajezdni, powinny być oznaczone jako używane liniowo, to oznaczona tak powinna być większość relacji skrętnych, czyli np. również relacje na węźle Traugutta, Rondzie JNJ, skrzyżowaniach Towarowa/Święty Marcin i Strzelecka/Królowej Jadwigi. Natomiast ja uważam, że estetyczniej byłoby, aby te tory oznaczone były jako nieużywane liniowo
db-ak (2025-10-04 20:57:01+00:00): Hej, czy temat ten był poruszany gdzieś na forum, discordzie czy tagowanie toru nieużywanego to własna uznaniowość? Estetyczniej by było gdyby wszystkie tory tramwajowe były tagowane jako tramwajowe, a nie zabawa co miesiąc z tagowaniem odcinku. Jeśli nad torem jest napięcie w sieci i tor może być używany awaryjnie lub okazjonalnie to nie popieram tagowania torów tylko na podstawie liniowego kursowania
Macie33k (2025-10-05 22:18:31+00:00): Jeśli kryterium do uznania toru za czynny ma być napięcie w sieci lub możliwość używania go awaryjnie, to każdy tor tramwajowy w Poznaniu można uznać i oznaczyć jako czynny, może poza torami na zajezdni Gajowa i odstawczymi na Budziszyńskiej.
mavl (2025-10-05 04:07:56+00:00): Здравствуйте. Получилось, что длина Кооперативной улицы составляет 10 км.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/611409690
desk77 (2025-10-05 10:07:59+00:00): Здравствуйте. Исправил.
ZioDragon (2025-10-06 10:35:50+00:00): Đề nghị thêm access=no bởi vì cao tốc chưa thông xe
ilias_ (2025-10-04 11:01:00+00:00): Hi, you seem to be adding data only to a building, while the hotel takes up the whole grounds and is actually huge. It would be better to tag the buildings as building=hotel, add a node for the hotel, and tag the whole area as landuse=commercial.
NeisBot (2025-10-04 08:57:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-12 05:21:31+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172828580
Dodko (2025-10-06 13:55:12+00:00): Novostavby je lepšie kresliť podľa vrstvy ZBGIS z katastra.
https://ibb.co/tw28X6Qw
Sylabowy Kot (2025-10-04 09:20:41+00:00): Ups, przeoczyłem część.
Piagno (2025-10-25 14:47:55+00:00): thanks for improving the map, but openstreetmap isn't a historical map. So please do not add old railways lines which aren't visible in reality or on aerial.
For historical data please use openhistoricalmap.
Sébastien Santsch (2025-10-25 16:37:03+00:00): There are thousands of completely dismantled railway lines around the world that are created and displayed on OpenStreetMap. They are notably included on OpenRailwayMap. Perhaps I put the wrong attribute when I created the line?
Piagno (2025-10-25 18:33:56+00:00): Yeah I know, but it is wrong to add not existing features to osm. Only because Openrailwaymap renders them, doesn't mean it's right.
However they recently added support for the openhistoricalmap data. So this should be rendered in it as well. It is documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Drazed that you should use openhistoricalmap for the non existing features.
Here is the news, where they added support for it, this year: https://forum.openhistoricalmap.org/t/openrailwaymap-adds-openhistoricalmap/446
maro21 (2025-10-07 14:44:54+00:00): Hi, do you know if cars are allowed? See https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=51.159229%2C16.949075%3B51.160561%2C16.950703#map=18/51.159891/16.949893
pavvv (2025-10-07 17:13:18+00:00): Nie są, co najwyżej można mieć rower albo wózek. To mały prom.
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1BQtxamnjk/

Można dać motor_vehicle=no.
silversurfer83 (2025-10-04 12:25:36+00:00): Hi :)

woher bekommst du denn die "Standortbescheinigungs-Nr." oder wie können andere Mapper das nachvollziehen?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172822809
einnutzer72 (2025-10-19 12:23:41+00:00): Die STOB ist von einer öffentlichen Seite der BNetzA
https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/DE/Vportal/TK/Funktechnik/EMF/start.html

Die Eintragungen erfolgen nach öffentllichen Pressemiteilungen
z. B.: https://www.presseportal.de/pm/9077/6139658
Es werden nur öffentliche Satelitenbilder bzw. die in OSM angeboten Luftbilder benutzt.

Schöne Grüße
einnutzer72
silversurfer83 (2025-10-19 12:57:18+00:00): Danke.

Dann gib diese Quellen bitte bei diesen über ganz DE verteilten Änderungen an. Es ist nämlich nicht nachvollziehbar für Außenstehende.

Der Änderungssatzkommentar ist daher auch mindestens irreführend, wenn nicht gar falsch.

Happy mapping
Silversurfer83