piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
goedegazelle (2023-06-25 07:22:01+00:00): Beste Raymond,

Het wordt erg op prijs gesteld als je aan OpenStreetMap meewerkt maar ik moet je wel ergens op wijzen.

Het is beslist niet de bedoeling om iedere punt te vervangen door een vlak. Ik heb de link naar StreetComplete gevolgd en ik schrik ervan dat het daar letterlijk wordt opgedragen. OpenStreetMap staat daar geheel los van. De Wiki raadt met klem af om op grote schaal dit soort wijzigingen uit te voeren.

De kaart wordt met veel zorg samengesteld op basis van onder andere directe observatie en andere betrouwbare bronnen. Veel zaken zijn expres als punt en niet als vlak op de kaart gezet. Als je dit aanpast zonder de situatie te kennen dan wordt de kaart daar in veel gevallen niet beter van.

De beste manier waarop je aan de kaart kunt bijdragen is door er zelf opuit te gaan en informatie te verzamelen en/of te controleren. Dit is de meerwaarde die een locale mapper geeft aan OSM en die commerciële bedrijven niet kunnen leveren.
goedegazelle (2023-06-25 07:24:56+00:00): Waar ik schrijf "streetcomplete" bedoelde ik uiteraard "maproulette". Ik maak er zelf geen gebruik van en ben daarom niet vertrouwd met de namen.
ChehrehBargi (2024-02-03 13:26:25+00:00): Note that adding other languages will internationalize the map, and to add another language to a city, street or shop, it is enough to translate it correctly. On the Baghdad road, my Persian translation was correct, but you deleted it. Currently, I will add the correct translation in Farsi again. In the same way, a Kurdish user had already registered it.
ChehrehBargi (2024-02-03 13:29:30+00:00): Correction of the last sentence:
 Similarly, in the Kurdish language, which a Kurdish user had previously 
recorded.
leegenes (2023-06-24 17:07:24+00:00): This should maybe be `route=mtb`. That's my bad. Was following Duluth Traverse route tags using `route=bicycle`, but I see Lester River MTB Trails has `route=mtb`.
euroPathfinder (2023-07-07 11:43:20+00:00): Soo, ich bin es nochmal :D

Die Öffnungszeiten passen so natürlich auch nicht. Magst Du selbst mal versuchen sie anhand des Wikis zu berichtigen?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137728486
highflyer74 (2023-07-07 12:40:02+00:00): @euroPathfinder: die wurden in der Zwischenzeit bereits von einer anderen Person repariert ;-)
euroPathfinder (2023-07-07 13:35:13+00:00): @highflyer74: Oh auf OSMCha gar nicht gesehen, danke für den Hinweis - dann hat es sich damit ja erledigt.

Gruß euroPathfinder
Akkurator (2023-06-29 21:54:31+00:00): Hallo ChrisFromRV,

ich bin vor 3 Wochen diesen Radweg extra abgefahren und habe das Tagging an die vorhanden Beschilderung angepasst. Nicht ohne mich vorher sehr ausführlich damit zu beschäftigen, wie so etwas getaggt werden kann. Habe ich auch als CS-Kommentar eingetragen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137006307
Ebenso habe ich die aktuelle Beschilderung in der jeweiligen Richtung als traffic_sign getaggt, damit das jeder nachvollziehen kann.

Du hast die traffic_sign tags nicht geändert, gleichzeitig aber wieder einen Radweg mit "Benutzungspflicht" in beide Richtungen daraus gemacht, was nicht der Beschilderung entspricht.

Warum diese Änderung? Was empfindest du am meinem Tagging als falsch?

Fragende Grüße,
Akkurator
Akkurator (2023-07-03 18:43:03+00:00): Eine Antwort wäre nett.

Ich würde das sonst wieder so ändern, dass es gem. wiki der vorhandenen Beschilderung (s. traffic_sign Tags) entspricht:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/115552935
bergab: DE:239,1022-10
bergauf: DE:240
Akkurator (2023-08-28 00:03:35+00:00): korrigiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140471320
mcliquid (2023-06-26 14:46:44+00:00): Hi, du hast das Café mitten auf der Straße platziert. Stimmt die Location hier wirklich?
Akkurator (2023-06-29 22:46:07+00:00): Hallo ChrisFromRV,

du hast hier einen separat getaggten Gehweg entlang der Schlierer Straße gelöscht, den User GCWMR kürzlich neu eingetragen hatte (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136988960) und stattdessen die Schlierer Straße auf ganzer Länge mit "sidewalk=yes" versehen.
Unterhalb der Kehre ist nur rechts (=bergauf) ein Gehweg (sidewalk=right).
Weiterhin sind oberhalb der Kehre die Gehwege schon separat erfasst, da sollte dann sidewalk=separate an die Straße, sonst ist der Gehweg doppelt.

Ich hab' das gleich mal korrigiert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137936328

PS: Achtung, an den oberen Sidewalks hängen Bushaltestellen und weitere Infos, also die nicht einfach auch löschen.
cats_pajamas (2023-06-28 22:59:02+00:00): Hello evgeniyakz,

I noticed that you added a ref=A-37 tag to the BAKAD ring road in Almaty (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1082255658 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1082223925). After doing some research on this highway online, I have not found any information on the A-37 ref. Would you mind sharing the source you referenced when adding this tag?

Thank you very much!

Automatic Translation:

Здравствуйте evgeniyakz,

Я заметил, что вы добавили тег ref=A-37 к кольцевой дороге БАКАД в Алматы (от https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1082255658 до https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1082223925). Проведя некоторое исследование этого шоссе в Интернете, я не нашел никакой информации об A-37 ref. Не могли бы вы поделиться источником, на который вы ссылались при добавлении этого тега?

Большое спасибо!
gma2th (2023-06-24 17:13:44+00:00): Asked the locals it’s ok to camp there. Camping cars can also stay overnight on the parking.
eggie (2023-06-24 20:06:47+00:00): Hi gma.. it's not an official camp_site with name.
Better remove your contribution.

Greetz,
eggie
gma2th (2023-06-24 20:14:14+00:00): Hi eggie, 

Thank you for your comment. I’m new here, should I replace camp site by something else?

Cheers,
eggie (2023-06-24 20:26:44+00:00): Hi... if it's not an official camp_site and there are no signs or info we don't add a camp_site.
At some spots there are Paalkampeerterreinen. That should be a valid tag. Is this a Paalkampeerterrein?
If not better remove the camp_site.
I made a note on the map and asked local mappers.
Greetz..
eggie
eggie (2023-06-24 20:28:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3749641
eggie (2023-06-24 20:35:22+00:00): And for the camperplace on the parking
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcaravan_site

But only if its an official camperplace.

Greetz..
eggie
gma2th (2023-06-24 21:07:46+00:00): Great, thank you!
Jordi MF (2023-06-25 11:42:16+00:00): Hola ramonz,
De vegades, utilitzes l'etiqueta highway=path per a pistes que poden ser transitades per vehicles, per tant, s'han d'etiquetar com a highway=track. Les corregiré les d'aquest conjunt de canvis.
lyctkel (2023-12-02 21:32:49+00:00): Hi deprado63,
bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11003380733 verwendest Du 
recycling:glass=glass.
Ich nehme an, recycling:glass=yes ist gemeint.
Abgesehen davon, ist vielleicht auch recycling:glass_bottles=yes gemeint?
recycling:glass würde bedeuten, dass auch Fensterglass gesammelt wird. Das kommt normalerweise nur bei Recyclinghöfen, aber nicht bei Containern vor.
Vielen Dank und Grüße,
lyctkel
MxxCon (2023-06-28 00:35:15+00:00): Hello.
Why did you tag all these crosswalks as =zebra or =uncontrolled when they are clearly =traffic_signals?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137729241
Juan MAS (2023-06-28 15:04:49+00:00): Hi, I changed the crosswalk that had the tag =unmarked, but I didn't see the =uncontrolled was put, I fix them. Thanks.
user_5359 (2023-06-26 10:02:37+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on http://www.osm.org/node/7500936777. Did this restaurant only exist in 2023? If no, a minus sign is still missing in front of the year number.
empty_child (2023-06-25 15:41:40+00:00): Dmitry Mantis, good afternoon
Please, don't attach node of building to the boundaries (I mean this (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11003422872) node of the hotel)
Dmitry Mantis (2023-06-27 14:26:17+00:00): Hello! Thanks for the review. The hotel building is physically under the previously added city boundaries. Should I change boundaries to avoid covering the building?

I added the buildings as they are with web OSM editor, I'm not quite experienced yet with OSM, sorry.
empty_child (2023-06-27 16:11:27+00:00): Yes, it would be great to extract node from boundaries. You can do it with same name operation in iD. After extracting, check it by moving the node (it shouldn't affect boundaries)
Dmitry Mantis (2023-07-16 09:04:00+00:00): Thanks! Fixed in changeset 138570113
Metzor (2023-09-04 00:55:50+00:00): Hi HarteKarte,

Die ausgewählten Wege in der Relation wären für "nur geradeaus" gültig. Diese gibt es aber ja schon und sehe ich auch auf mapillary-Bildern von 2017. Wurde das Schild auf ein Rechtsabbiegeverbot geändert? Dann müsste man die Relation hier so ändern, dass der (südliche) Kennerweg als (einziges) "to"-Mitglied drin steht und könnte dann die geradeaus-Relation löschen. Oder?

Wie kann ich eigentlich "siehe Foto in Kommentar hier" für mich sichtbar machen?
Viele Grüße
Metzor
Konkon153 (2023-06-24 18:53:48+00:00): [ und damit alle 257 aktuell vorhandenen Adressen in der Gemeinde Lüttow-Valluhn vollständig angepasst ]
user_14538650 (2023-06-24 20:20:29+00:00): Nice work on the landuse. I'm also adding landuse at https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/21.2707/105.3948 that you might want to check out.
Dodko (2023-07-16 22:30:45+00:00): Pre obchodné centrum použite
shop=mall
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=mall
dónal (2023-08-06 23:30:03+00:00): Thanks for adding this important addition. Makes a huge difference for pedestrians and cyclists. :)
mga_geo (2023-11-09 21:08:38+00:00): Bonsoir,
Le bus=no est surprenant sur le node 7028395657, c'est une erreur ?
Marc
maferikotupi (2023-11-10 17:27:48+00:00): Bonjour
L'arrêt n'est plus désservi suite à refonte du réseau, mais le totem est encore en place. On pourrait mettre disused
mga_geo (2023-11-11 06:42:32+00:00): Bonjour,
C'est la contradiction entre les attributs
  bus = no
  highway = bus_stop
qui me dérangent.
Je supprimerai l'attribut bus qui n'est plus utile en PTv2.
Marc
csimeona22 (2023-06-27 21:38:34+00:00): Traducción automática:
¡Buenas tardes compañero mapeador! Estaba revisando caminos en la ciudad de Jamay y noté que se quitaron muchas etiquetas de sentido único aquí. Pero creo que todas las etiquetas de un solo sentido eran originalmente correctas. Por ejemplo, hay una infraestructura de un solo sentido en https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/211058628 que es visible en Mapillary https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=616311412618594. Otro es el letrero de "no entrar" en https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/484060258 que también se ve en Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=374714347274018 lado derecho de la imagen). Otro ejemplo está en https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293859900 que también se ve en Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1097751874115273).

Le escribo con la esperanza de que pueda revisar y corregir los cambios en la etiqueta de un solo sentido. ¡Déjame saber si puedo ser de alguna ayuda! ¡Feliz mapeo!

Gracias,
csimeona22

Good afternoon fellow mapper! I was reviewing roads in the town of Jamay, and noticed many oneway tags were removed here. But, I believe all the oneway tags were originally correct. For example, there is oneway infrastructure on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/211058628 that is visible in Mapillary https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=616311412618594. Another is the “do not enter” sign on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/484060258 also seen in Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=374714347274018 right side of image). Another example is on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293859900 seen in Mapillary as well (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1097751874115273).

I am writing in hopes you could possibly review and correct the oneway tag changes? Let me know if I can be of any help! Happy mapping!

Thank you,
csimeona22
SherbetS (2023-06-24 20:48:30+00:00): thanks!
syntex (2023-07-01 08:48:32+00:00): : O
syntex (2023-07-01 08:49:20+00:00): To chyba muszę odpalić przetagowywanie na terenie warszawy i  aglomeracji
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-24 21:00:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245743192

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
fr33 (2023-06-24 20:55:28+00:00): Pressemitteilungen:
https://archive.ph/1k6Ro
https://archive.ph/YOzX1
yelisey90 (2023-06-25 20:08:05+00:00): so is it a hairdresser or a shop? is it Cecilia or Garrison?
alexanderniki (2023-06-25 20:11:34+00:00): It is Garrison. A barbershop (hairdresser). 
There is no Cecilia at this place.
Leo Slager (2023-06-24 22:46:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
AndersAndersson (2023-06-25 00:02:45+00:00): Hej!
Ska skogen ha namnet Valletorget?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/757915174/history
JesperBjork (2023-06-25 04:37:12+00:00): Hej Anders!

Den delen av skogen är där SkiStar har Valletorget, där de har shower och mindre sevärdheter, tänk dig typ en mindre trollskogen. 

Det kanske går att sätta en POI där istället för att döpa den delen av skogen till det, kanske blir tydligare nu när du nämner det! Vad tycker du?
AndersAndersson (2023-06-25 07:38:53+00:00): Aha, då förstår jag. Jag trodde först att namnet hamnat på fel polygon.
Jag kommer inte på något uppenbart sätt att tagga det, så sättet du gjort kanske är det bästa.
user_5359 (2023-06-26 10:06:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please teak a look on http://www.osm.org/node/4108398528. which currency did you mean with currency:تومان = yes. Please notice we use a short cut standard for the currencies.
ExoMal (2023-06-24 23:31:24+00:00): Hi Limo, regarding WAY: 1182111809, why did you remove the building tag and add landuse=residential? It looks like a building from the satellite imagery, and I believe the building use is part residential and part commercial.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137735889
Limo4719 (2023-06-30 11:42:57+00:00): Thanks for raising this with me. I have done a survey and concluded this building is mixed use.
Glassman (2023-06-25 00:27:12+00:00): I'm going to be in Winthrop in early July. Is there anything I can do to help?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137736083
stevea (2023-06-25 00:49:22+00:00): Wow, Mr. S., you are Johnny-on-it!  It was only a few hours ago I exchanged email with Kerry Irons (ACA, USBRS architect) about this and he now has an agenda item (autumn round?) to ask WSDOT about these three "parallel" segments on USBR 10 if they are possible "alt" or "belt routes" that might improve the route for the future.

What happens is "essentially rogue" OSM editors quite incorrectly add these parallel segments to route relations (more than in Washington, but Washington is sorta "hot" with these now), "making it seem" like this is / these are actual segments of the route.  But in truth, neither WSDOT applied for them to be in USBR 10, nor has AASHTO Approved them.

So, before deleting them, I told Kerry a few days ago that I see these added (sometimes with much-more-likely-to-be-Approved parallel CYCLEWAY infrastructure) to USBRs, knowing they are incorrect, but perhaps OSM can "maximally wring out" potential beneficial route data to present to a DOT to present to AASHTO if the DOT agrees these might make "better route" segments.  Kerry agreed that this is yet another way OSM can contribute to the bettering of the USBRS and agreed to present these (OSM volunteer errors to the route) to DOTs and say "mappers think these might make valid, better or parallel routing along this USBR in the future...what do you think, DOT?"

We'll see.  As they are incorrect, I added the note tag, and as I do or don't hear back from Kerry (who will hear from WSDOT), they are very likely to be deleted from the route relation.  Or, on the off-chance they like the mapper-added segments, the DOT will turn it into an application to AASHTO.  But this will take some months.

As the USBRS is "only partially signed" (Kerry estimates ~25% of the System is signed), you MIGHT see USBR 10 signs on the Winthrop-Twisp segments that are REALLY part of USBR 10 (Highway 20), but you won't on the Main Street, Perry Street, Castle Avenue, Twisp-Winthrop East Road, East Twisp-Winthrop Road, Wagner Street segments, as they are incorrectly "conjured" or "imagined" into being into USBR 10 by an OSM mapper.  If those latter segments were surveyed as to their "bicycle suitability" and say, you improved tags to where you might add cycleway=lane if it exists (I'm speculating), that would be fantastic and would add to the map, sure, but I'm not sure it would specifically help the situation beyond where Kerry intends to take it with WSDOT in the autumn.  So, maybe, but not really.  I certainly appreciate your good spirit to help here!

And, you'd be traveling between Winthrop and Twisp (9, 10 miles?) for what I might call "very little value," except I've never been to the Methow Valley, and it could be quite pretty in July.

Nice to hear from you.
Glassman (2023-06-25 02:52:57+00:00): Good to hear from you as well. And yes, Methow Valley should be great - except if we have wildfires. Then not so much. We've been there a number of times and love it. However, because it's so expensive to live there the businesses have a hard time hiring help. The help can't afford the cost of lodging over the summer.

I'll have my dashcam running so I can travel both routes for a distance. (We actually come in from the west to Winthrop but Twist is just up the road a piece.) Unfortunately this is just a short two day trip so we can explore more.

I have good contacts with WSDOT if you need any help. My friend works on accessibility projects so I'm guessing she works around people that do bike routes.

best
stevea (2023-06-25 03:36:16+00:00): A kind offer re WSDOT contacts.  This is in a sort of "cold storage holding pattern" for now, so let's see what Kerry uncovers later in the year.

Enjoy all that beauty out there!
ivanbranco (2023-06-29 13:28:37+00:00): Hi Map-Finder,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1184734340

this building and the nearby one have invalid wikidata values, could you take a look at them?

thanks and good mapping
jmarchon (2023-06-24 22:45:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137737060
jmarchon (2023-06-24 22:45:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137737064
jmarchon (2023-06-24 22:45:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137737065
jmarchon (2023-06-24 22:46:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137737071
jmarchon (2023-06-24 22:46:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137737073
jmarchon (2023-06-24 22:46:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137737078
jmarchon (2023-06-24 22:46:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137737081
jmarchon (2023-06-24 22:46:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137737086
jmarchon (2023-06-24 22:46:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137737090
jmarchon (2023-06-24 22:47:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137737092
jmarchon (2023-06-24 22:47:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137737100
jmarchon (2023-06-24 22:47:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137737101
jmarchon (2023-06-24 22:47:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137737104
MapRobber (2023-06-24 23:09:45+00:00): Verificado ao fazer uma entrega no local. Antes desta correção, apps de navegação GPS baseados no OSM nunca iriam encontrar o local via pesquisa.
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-01 05:49:42+00:00): As I have mentioned before, please use more detailed changeset comments.  Instead of "Yes", can you put what you changed and why?

More details on good changeset comments can be found here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.
BCNorwich (2023-06-25 05:38:01+00:00): Node removed. Is the position wrong?
rskedgell (2023-08-20 06:01:11+00:00): @BCNorwich No, it was just vandalism. See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7410
tomhukins (2024-09-21 17:52:17+00:00): Thank you for all your helpful work on the map.

The name "Byway Open To All Traffic" looks like a description not a name: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

I suspect these tracks would be tagged better without a name using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:designation%3Dbyway_open_to_all_traffic instead.

What do you think?
JDu7 (2023-06-28 11:16:21+00:00): Bonne idée d'ajouter le passage piéton en plus du passage cyclable, par contre, il faut le connecter aux chemins qu'il traverse. 
Du côté nord le trottoir existe, il suffit de le connecter. Du côté sud, connecter le passage piéton à la piste cyclable.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137738329
mueschel (2023-06-25 17:16:34+00:00): Hi,
it seems something went wrong here - you uploaded hundreds of nodes that look like a todo-list copied from maproulette?
Walkingmage (2023-06-25 18:08:58+00:00): Hi,
everyone of those nodes are (/should be) unmapped islands/islets, drawing them all by myself would take a long time so I set up a maproulette task, and tagged everyone I could see with fixme=draw island. I should probably have used another tag...
I added the maproulette:priority (=high/low) tag to get some way to prioritize bigger island
tyfi (2023-06-25 04:31:41+00:00): Bing Aerial Imagery
Kovoschiz (2023-06-25 07:03:21+00:00): Please don't add descriptor labels to `name=`. It is for proper names only. Use the final completed title of this feature.
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-09 19:31:15+00:00): The silos are tanks that were part of an oil battery.  You found a decommissioned oilfield wellsite.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137740370
arcanma (2023-07-01 10:22:05+00:00): Ciao giultri78, hai chiesto la revisione delle modifiche, la tabaccheria è inserita correttamente, forse per l'altro negozio non hai trovato l'etichetta giusta e hai inserito "Alimentari" nel nome, ma il negozio in quel modo non è visualizzato sulla mappa. 
L'etichetta shop=minimarket era già stata inserita e ora ho tolto il nome per cui adesso ha le etichette corrette e la mappa lo riporta come dovrebbe.
arcanma (2023-07-01 10:33:23+00:00): Inserimento controllato, molto bene.
Dato che c'è il pagamento con carte di credito per avere la perfezione si potrebbero specificare anche le carte di credito accettate (se si sanno)
arcanma (2023-07-01 14:33:22+00:00): Effettuato il controllo richiesto. Ho aggiunto delle informazioni utili guardando la pagina web del museo
Bede Mitchell (2024-04-23 23:00:49+00:00): Is Ngunguru Heights Rise closed? I was wondering if the access should be private instead of no.
Jeremy Browne (2024-05-04 02:00:08+00:00): Thanks Bede.  You're correct - I'll amend now.
user_18305684 (2023-06-26 12:25:22+00:00): Hi,

way 1184779704 : to write with uppercase doesn't work, you have to use lowercase for values.

I fixed it.

Best regards
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-21 10:34:36+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11005348032/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )