piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
btwhite92 (2026-04-14 01:26:36+00:00): Can you please explain why this changeset upgraded Sunset/Bottari Ranch/Lower Lamoille to 'secondary', especially after trying to argue that NV 227 should be downgraded to 'secondary'? These are minor unpaved county roads that carry no through traffic.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-04-14 06:27:51+00:00): If I don't, a secondary stub will remain at SR 227 and Lamoille Canyon Road. The only other nearby destination would be the Humboldt–Toiyabe National Forest; even here, the access road (NF 660) ends at a roundabout, which apparently is quite common (at least as far as I know) in Utah.
btwhite92 (2026-04-14 15:14:26+00:00): There's no hard rule that there can't be "stubs", especially if it's at the expense of arbitrarily promoting local-access dirt roads to 'secondary'.
Joseph R P (2026-04-14 23:22:16+00:00): +1 to stubs themselves not being an issue in their own right, as rather they are more a symptom of greater problematic classification criteria or careless editing. I should specify that these road classification stubs are usually an issue since they typically will stem from physical-construction based classification, route designations, an accidental or incomplete edit, etc. As I have explained before though, there will be instances where because of physical geography or road conditions, a road should not be classified any higher past a certain point and a stub-ended route is justified.

Just like with the primary stretch of Lamoille Highway ending at a central location in Spring Creek where the traffic splits off onto other lower-tier major roads, this logic can be used with a secondary road ending at a split with tertiary roads. Some of it goes straight into the small community of Lamoille, while some goes south into the Ruby Mountain Wilderness Area. Neither of these destinations in their own merits may be worth 'linking' with a secondary route, but considering traffic heading to both of these destinations (and anywhere else beyond) is forced onto a single highway makes that highway that much more important.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-04-15 00:54:19+00:00): Okay, I'll fix these.
Wildsharky (2026-04-15 08:42:40+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181316991
citrula (2026-04-13 18:37:08+00:00): this was already mapped as access=private with a gate, and now you have removed the highway tag entirely. Could you maybe explain what you are trying to accomplish with these edits?
asphalteric (2026-04-14 08:20:27+00:00): I just want these edits to end up not classifying these tagged paths as listed streets of San Francisco on CityStrides. https://geographic.org/streetview/usa/ca/san_francisco.html
citrula (2026-04-14 18:06:48+00:00): Are you on the citystrides forum?
https://community.citystrides.com/

While I don't use the software, I know that James is very active and helpful when it comes to fixing this sort of issue on his end. Since these were already access=private, they were tagged correctly. I encourage you to make a post on the CityStrides forum to figure out how this particular situation should be dealt with.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-04-15 21:08:58+00:00): Per the request of Citrula on the OSM-US Slack, reverted/repaired mistagging of the entire private road as a barrier=gate instead of setting access=private and tagging the individual gate nodes with such in changeset 181387495

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181387495
Digitaleo (2026-04-15 07:50:16+00:00): Bonjour @zorglubu,

Je me suis permis de repasser sur ta modification pour remettre en contact les adresses. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12684892601/history/6
zorglubu (2026-04-15 08:59:05+00:00): Tout à fait OK. :-)
osmviborg (2026-04-13 10:19:02+00:00): Mangler du ikke at slette noget på havnen i Grenaa?
b-holdet (2026-04-13 10:57:21+00:00): Øhh... sidste afgang er altså her i slutningen af april...
b-holdet (2026-04-13 10:59:05+00:00): https://www.stenaline.dk/ruter/grenaa-halmstad
steenkobberoe (2026-04-14 06:31:58+00:00): E1 på havnen i Grenå er slettet.
Selvom færgen fortsat sejler, er der ikke adgang for gående, hvilket er årsagen til, at vi (European Hiking Federation) lægger E1 om.
Vi mangler en officiel beslutning om at lade E1 følge kystruten langs Østjylland til Frederikshavn. Men det kommer forhåbentlig inden længe, da det er mig, der har ansvaret for alle fjernvandreveje i Europa.
Wildsharky (2026-04-15 08:33:30+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181312352
ajmat (2026-04-15 07:27:07+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 181353213
fayor (2026-04-13 15:37:55+00:00): Ciao, i nomi delle strade con numeri romani vanno scritti per esteso; i civici non vanno inseriti negli edifici ma nel punto di accesso (cancello o cancelletto).
fayor (2026-04-13 15:42:22+00:00): Inoltre non è necessario inserire anche città e cap, sono informazioni già presenti nella geolocalizzazione
Orazio98S (2026-04-13 16:01:01+00:00): ok grazie
Orazio98S (2026-04-13 16:02:16+00:00): come hai fatto a fare i quadrati così precisi?
fayor (2026-04-13 16:04:25+00:00): Ci sono tantissime funzioni negli editor che aiutano la mappatura
Antonino_Faro (2026-04-13 20:13:22+00:00): Ciao, esattamente come dice fayor.

L'editor web (chiamato iD) è fornito di moltissime funzionalità per una mappatura precisa.

Per creare dei poligoni ortogonali devi selezionare il poligono in questione, fare tasto destro e selezionare "Ortogonalizza" (ha una icona a forma di quadrato).

Aggiungo un piccolo extra, tieni sottocchio la parte in basso a destra, se vedi un triangolino giallo iD ti sta indicando che possibilmente c'è un problema nelle tue modifiche che potrebbe essere causato da una svista o da una piccola imprecisione.
Selezionando di mostra l'elenco delle avvertenze che ha individuato per capire cosa sistemare prima di pubblicare le modifiche.

Buona mappatura!!
Antonino_Faro (2026-04-13 20:27:20+00:00): Precisazione: tieni presente che il validatore di iD è un ottimo aiuto e trova gran parte delle imprecisioni, ma non riesce a vederle proprio tutte. Ad esempio, può segnalarti se un edificio si sovrappone a un altro, ma non può sapere se un indirizzo è scritto male o se un nome è errato.

Dai sempre una occhiata finale per garantire che tutto quadra prima di pubblicare una modifica.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-13 10:01:55+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181267251
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-13 10:02:20+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181267251
Wildsharky (2026-04-15 08:32:29+00:00):  Reverted in changeset id:181311735
Mar1jn (2026-04-13 12:39:45+00:00): Kerk is omgebouwd tot appartement. Hierdoor isa om het gebouw zelf ook het één en het andere veranderd. Zo is er een parkeerplaats aan de voorzijde gekomen, daarbij is de kunst en het groen verdwenen. nu is het één grote parkeerplek geworden. aan de achterzijde van de kerk is een tuin gerealiseerd, waar ook een pad door heen loopt, deze is openbaar.
eggie (2026-04-13 13:50:13+00:00): Oke Martijn,

Waar is de straatnaam waar de adressen aan linken?
Ik heb de straatnaam toegevoegd conform de BGT

Is Lourdeshof niet de straatnaam?
MVG
eggie
Mar1jn (2026-04-13 14:11:27+00:00): Ja, denk dat u gelijk hebt. Ik heb dat aangepast. Zal ik naam van het gebouw dan ook terug veranderen naar oorspronkelijke naam?

Met vriendelijke groet,

Marijn
eggie (2026-04-13 14:17:45+00:00): Denk t wel. Die gebouwnamen veranderen vaak niet ook al is de functie anders.
Mapse
Cayenne17 (2026-04-19 20:16:12+00:00): Bonsoir,
Merci pour vos contributions à OSM.
Je viens d'améliorer le parking et j'ai rajouté des infos sur le commerce Netto: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181553995
vlakos555 (2026-04-13 13:41:44+00:00): tento chodník stavbári sprístupnili a nahrádza ten čo bol východne, paralelne, bližšie k Ch.ramenu. Veď som to poslal nafotené.
aceman444 (2026-04-14 08:59:35+00:00): Ktory chodnik myslite? Je tu nieco nespravne?
vlakos555 (2026-04-14 10:11:16+00:00): Myslím ten čo som po ňom išiel a robil stopu. Je to správne v mape.
aceman444 (2026-04-14 17:21:57+00:00): Veru, ten pri elektricke tam na 100% nie je podla Vasich fotiek.
vlakos555 (2026-04-14 17:26:40+00:00): Veď preto som tam zas bol
Manuel H (2026-06-09 21:17:17+00:00): Hallo,

was ist Node 13727113935 für ein Tor? Ist das auf dem Weg? Ist es geschlossen? Kommt man durch?
So ist es mit keinem Weg verbunden und es gibt eine Warnung in iD.

MFG,

Manuel
NeisBot (2026-04-13 09:30:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/6514401 v9 | 8 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181266113
eggie (2026-04-13 09:43:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Hier is nogal wat schade ontstaan door schuiven met de kaart. 
Ik kijk even of het simpel te herstellen is. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-13 09:50:22+00:00): Schade hersteld.. Weg teruggelegd. Alle waardes zijn in UK English 
fietsen kan geheel weg. Bij capacity alleen een getal.
Sietske Oosterhof (2026-04-13 09:56:13+00:00): Hi,

Excuses voor de verschuivingen die ik heb veroorzaakt, dat was niet mijn bedoeling...
Sietske Oosterhof (2026-04-13 09:58:26+00:00): Moet ik dit nu zelf aanpassen, of wordt dat door jullie gedaan. Verder zou ik wel wat hulp willen bij het verder uitwerken van hetgene waar mee ik ben begonnen. Kunnen jullie daar misschien mee helpen?
eggie (2026-04-13 11:27:11+00:00): Sietse, Je kunt je vragen kwijt op het forum van OSM. Daar zal iemand vast wel advies kunnen geven.
No problem verder.. de schade is hetsteld.
Schafe ontstaat door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.
Groet,
eggie
eggie (2026-04-13 11:54:00+00:00): Sietske,

Hier kun je vragen kwijt:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43
iandees (2026-04-13 13:16:12+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/47425744 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181275902, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
eggie (2026-04-13 13:45:30+00:00): Hi  iandees,

Why fixing my fix?

Greetz,
eggie
iandees (2026-04-13 14:22:53+00:00): My revert of that node move had a conflict and undid your change. Sorry about that! I'll move it back to where you put it.
eggie (2026-04-13 14:29:21+00:00): I think it's okay.
Maybe a node was left at that junction.
I did'nt made a revert, just a fix.
eggie (2026-04-13 14:30:02+00:00): @Sietske, Waarom staan die fietsverhuurpunten in een relatie?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-13 14:31:17+00:00): Relatie verwijderd
kuhni74 (2026-04-13 10:43:42+00:00): danke!
kuhni74 (2026-04-13 10:57:56+00:00): danke vielmals!
eggie (2026-04-13 09:37:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Waarom heten de overige stukken nog wel Westerdiepdalkanaal?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-13 09:40:49+00:00): De naam heb ik consistent gemaakt  bij het oostelijk deel.
Laat maar weten als dat niet correct is.
MVG,
eggie
Wdd Waling (2026-04-13 10:30:10+00:00): beste Eggie, Ter info: ik woon in Westerdiepsterdallen. Dank voor de -snelle- reactie. Het stuk van de punt in het westen 53.089349/6.803264 tot zeilplas Langebosch 53.082594/6.838985 is het in 2007 gegraven Westerdiepsterdallenkanaal. (had eerste op de aanlegkaarten de naam dal: mijn suggestie dit te veranderen in dallen is destijds overgenomen). 
Mvrgr
eggie (2026-04-13 11:15:13+00:00): Oke.. dan zal het nu kloppen. Je had zelf maar een gedeelte aangepast.
Mvg,
eggie
joost schouppe (2026-04-28 11:00:13+00:00): Je had ook nog dit hele segment aangeduid als sluis; dat moet natuurlijk enkel tussen de twee sluisdeuren. Ik heb het even aangepast.
demon_box (2026-04-13 15:39:39+00:00): Ciao gpl94, ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti un edificio può avere più entrate e di conseguenza più numeri civici. 
Quindi hai 2 opzioni: 
1. Se conosci esattamente la posizione (entrata) del civico che stai mappando metti tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su un nodo del perimetro dell'edificio (aggiungendo anche il tag entrance sullo stesso nodo);
2. Se invece non hai questa informazione così precisa devi mettere tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su nodo adiacente ma STACCATO dal poligono dell'edificio.
P.S.: l'eventuale lettera dopo il civico (nel tuo caso 6a) va sempre minuscola.
Ho già proceduto con le correzioni del caso. 
Grazie e BuonMapping!
gpl94 (2026-04-15 13:01:38+00:00): Grazie della correzione!
kuhni74 (2026-04-13 10:45:50+00:00): danke vielmals!
Frans S (2026-04-22 10:19:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please focus on mapping highways, connecting buildings/settlements, and road networks. No need to map paths in between farmland.
Best regards
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-13 10:02:52+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181267251
rskedgell (2026-04-13 10:21:09+00:00): (Review requested)

The house numbering looks fine, but is there any reason why you deleted these two solar panel nodes?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8040935260/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8040935261/history
ThePostieMan (2026-04-13 10:31:20+00:00): The solar panels overode the house numbering and I couldn't find a way to make the numbering show
rskedgell (2026-04-14 06:20:42+00:00): I can see the reasoning, but although the solar panels may have made the house numbers harder to see in the iD editor, they're features which someone else had taken the time to add. I've un-deleted them in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181305179

In general, the only reason to delete something from OSM is that it does not exist (any more). Even in that case, if it's a case where a building has been demolished but is still visible in aerial imagery, it may be appropriate to use a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Although it's not quite the same thing, it's also worth reading https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

You're doing a great job improving addressing information around Watford. Have you had a look at the StreetComplete and Every Door mobile apps as ways to collect information like house numbers while walking around?
Jordi MF (2026-04-22 22:21:02+00:00): Este changeset contiene un error grave de mapeado: se ha eliminado el nombre de la calle y se ha convertido en un caril bici cuando sigue siendo una calle. Por favor, las rutas ciclistas como una vía verde debe de mapearse en forma de relación y sin añadir carriles bici inexistentes y, encima, sobreponerlos, a la calzada. En OpenStreetMap no se mapea así.
Puedes consultar la wiki de OSM para revisar los criterios de mapeado.
Saludos
NeisBot (2026-04-13 09:57:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13727115858 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Landscape company office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisBot (2026-04-13 09:57:22+00:00): Hi dibi_ca, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 highway(s)
- 6854 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181267251
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-13 10:03:24+00:00): This changeset reverts multiple changesets of https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Roberto%20Fazzini .... ?
dibi_ca (2026-04-13 14:22:47+00:00): Yes, i confirm, because these elements are superfluos and in next days i must arrange better the trees of these area
mueschel (2026-04-19 09:35:44+00:00): Hi,
you introduced another destination tagging scheme here that hasn't been used in any other place so far. 
Could you check the wiki for the common schemes (we already have 3!) and use one of those?
ivanbranco (2026-04-19 10:21:23+00:00): In Italy we mostly use the destination schema documented in the CAI wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI#Luoghi_di_posa

Seems like this is a vibe-coded editor?
Federico Pinotti (2026-04-19 10:47:35+00:00): Fixed, thanks!

@ivan yes it has been vibe coded

https://www.fsexplore.com/guidepost/guidepost_map.php

Anything against it? Or maybe you have some suggestions ☺️

I have created it to help anyone adding data to the map, you know that a TON of guidepost have zero info? No destinations, no info, no elevation. Nothing.

Btw the Italian schema is missing the path numbers, imho they should have been included as well.
mueschel (2026-04-19 10:55:45+00:00): Quite obviously no properly written tool. At the very least you (yourself!) have to (manually!) check that the tags created match those documented and in use in OSM. 

You will very quickly find that 'duration' is never used with 'destination' and that numbers are never added directly after 'destination' and that 'ref' is never used to add the name of the destination.

The tags your artificial non-intelligence used will not show up in any application and therefore are useless.

Although the scheme Ivan linked is very common in Italy, I would recommend the "direction_north" scheme that is better suited to include also the directions the sign points to.
Federico Pinotti (2026-04-19 11:56:53+00:00): In my previous answer you can see "fixed, thanks"
That's was both for the change set, and for my useless non-intelligence  

I needed better guidepost for my application, and that was the reasons I created a way to improve them in Osm ( a personal note, maybe you should focus your attention to mappers that have added Guidepost without destination rather to mappers that have added too much!)
 
Now my application was able to read my edits, lol, in a imho better way than escaping a  potentially very long string with pipes and semicolumns, plus the need ot regex to extract time at destination.
But because of the CAI scheme, I have adapted my application and the editor (and this was before your kind comment, this specific edit was submitted before the fix)

And yes, direction_cardinal would be a perfect addition, but at the moment the implementation is not yet capable of it
mueschel (2026-04-19 13:19:20+00:00): Please don't tag for your specific application. OSM only works if everybody uses the same set of tags. And if some tag is not supported by one application - just use one that already supports it, e.g. Waymarkedtrails.
Layft Greater (2026-04-24 10:52:11+00:00): I believe an outdated aerial imagery was used for this changeset.

Previous streets were correctly mapped. Please revert.

https://facilmap.org/#18/34.65111/32.99712/Mpnk/%22changeset%20181267746%22
MountHuila (2026-04-24 18:09:53+00:00): Hi Layft Greater,
Thank you for reaching out, I used Vantor Hub imagery from March 2026 to make this edit and meant to cite that imagery.

Apple has an agreement with Vantor Hub (previously Maxar) to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which is not publicly available for editing OpenStreetMap. We generally use the imagery that is already available in JOSM but where we do use that more recent imagery, we always cite it and the date the imagery is from in the changeset source. 

If you have any updates or newer imagery, I can defer to your edits.
Layft Greater (2026-05-04 07:24:59+00:00): Changes in this changeset are actually relevant.
Thank you.
kapazao (2026-04-17 10:07:01+00:00): Hola, ¿sabes si el edificio tiene realmente 2 plantas o es por lo que se ve desde fuera?
En Catastro está indicado con una sola planta.
Un saludo
iandees (2026-04-13 13:16:25+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8098681970 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181275908, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
SomeoneElse (2026-04-15 19:41:49+00:00): Something went very wrong here.  You deleted part of a major road, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1216890479 .  See http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=181268152 .
B Sai Deepthi (2026-04-16 09:45:36+00:00): Apologies for the mistake and Thank you for your valuable feedback. I will make sure to be more cautious in future. 
Thank you. 
B Sai Deepthi
SomeoneElse (2026-04-16 10:14:19+00:00): Just to be absolutely clear, Uber are expected to abide by https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines as described in detail at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20146 .  If you restart editing before fully complying with that you will be blocked again.
B Sai Deepthi (2026-04-16 17:24:58+00:00): Thank you for the clarification. We understand the guidelines and will make sure to fully follow them before resuming editing. We will review the details and take the necessary steps to avoid any further issues
Thank you.
B Sai Deepthi
SomeoneElse (2026-04-23 11:18:31+00:00): Alas, editing resumed before Uber added OEG entries for this activity, hence https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20174 .
Jens P (2026-04-30 17:50:13+00:00): Aerial images are not up to date. Please revert everything east of "lying eight"-shaped roundabout.
jmty8 (2026-05-04 14:35:38+00:00): Hello! Thank you for your feedback.
Could you please clarify which specific routes (IDs) you believe need to be reverted? Some of the changes are correct, so it would be better to leave them on the map.
If you know the area well, I would greatly appreciate your help identifying roads that need correction (IDs). Perhaps you could help me with these corrections? This will help ensure the map is as accurate as possible.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181268337
Jens P (2026-05-04 16:21:49+00:00): Hello, 
please try to revert 
>way 1473871670 
>way 1473943555
>way 1474143087

These roads already exist and allow bike routing from Schleißheimer Straße to Knorrstraße. Please check routing capability afterwards or drop me a line and I to...

The aerial image ist outdated.

Have a nice day!
Jens
jmty8 (2026-05-05 09:06:22+00:00): Hello Jens, I've reverted those ways! I've reverted also one more way I've deleted so if it should be edited it can be done later. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182239054 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182239105
There are two changesets due to partial reverter. 

Have a nice day too!
pesec (2026-04-13 10:43:32+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Данным пакетом правок вы сместили здание по адресу ул.Пролетарская улица 82А
Очевидно, вы не выровняли спутниковую подложку и относительно остальных объектов смещение не верное.
Вернул здание на место.