piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
martin_schnurer (2026-06-20 12:12:06+00:00): Môžem sa opýtať u akého subjektu vznikajú podobné cyklotrasy/cyklomagistrály? Myslím to naozaj v dobrom ale nech sa na mňa nikto nehnevá, ja ako cyklista som proti podobným nápadom. Neviem sa vyjadriť k celému úseku, ale aby niekto označil priateľskú trasu pre bicyklovanie na úseku Brezina-Kazimír, alebo Michaľany-Luhyňa, tak to chce naozaj odvahu. Tieto trasy sú života ohrozujúce pre cyklistov, pretože ľudia tam jazdia ako blázni. Tieto zmeny sa potom prenášajú na cycloosm a špatia informovanosť, resp. vytvárajú klamlivý dojem pre niekoho, kto to tam nepozná, aby si tam naplánoval bezpečný výlet. Potom sa iba ľudia čo si tam chceli urobiť pekný dník na bicykli chytajú za hlavu. Toť celé.
martin_schnurer (2026-06-20 12:14:38+00:00): Brezina až Kalša to iste. Život ohrozujúce.
Filip009CZ (2026-06-20 12:24:44+00:00): Dobrý deň, značenie cyklotrás je v kompetencií značkárov SCK https://www.cykloklub.sk/jednotny-system-znacenia-na-slovensku/. Oni v teréne vyberú trasovanie, vybavia povolenia, financie a následne trasy v teréne vyznačia. Pokiaľ dané trasy v teréne neexistujú (nie sú na stromoch "C-čka" alebo na rázcestiach smerovníky) môžete také trasy vymazať. Pokiaľ ale v teréne existujú prvky, ktoré potvrdzujú prítomnosť trasy, odporúčam trasu v mape ponechať.
martin_schnurer (2026-06-20 12:27:06+00:00): Ďakujem za info
ion_chi (2026-01-28 15:07:28+00:00): Hi, You edited a street, which I've reverted. You can use the following site to help add your business: https://www.onosm.org/
rskedgell (2026-01-28 10:57:29+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and many thanks for helping to improve the map.

The wiki page for ford=yes suggests that you could use depth=* in combination, although I appreciate that it might not be practical or safe to measure or estimate this. I'm also not sure if any routers will take this into account.

It could be worth asking on https://community.openstreetmap.org/ for other suggestions, which may be better than mine.

Although you didn't add it to the ford, bicycle=no (and access tags generally) apply to legal rather than practical access.
oxonmapper (2026-01-28 17:07:09+00:00): Thanks.  There needs to be some indication of restricted practical access for cycling.  This ford is mostly deep and with a loose river substrate, as far as I'm aware.  Many cycle routing websites will by default route cyclists across this ford inappropriately.  Perhaps something like:  bicycle=yes
bicycle:conditional=no @ (high_water)
bxl-forever (2026-01-28 09:24:53+00:00): Hello.
Thanks at least for having provided clear description of your changes.
Indeed, the previous situation of the map appeared to be incorrect, that should be one building and not two.  There were many problems with this morning’s edits, but we could repair everything.
Building structures and addresses are complicated to grasp, do not hesitate to ask—e.g. by opening a note on the map itself—if you are not sure, we will be happy to help.
ma_ew (2026-01-28 14:04:24+00:00): Sorry for the mistakes and thank you for your feedback. I see what I should have done and will remember for next time :)
JuanElDemografo (2026-01-28 18:11:18+00:00): Why did you add the tags key=tunnel and parking=*? I can't find anything about these on the wiki and they seem like mistakes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177794189
Bananax47 (2026-01-28 19:40:53+00:00): Hi, i was fixing some issues using osmose and they were the recommanded fixes by osmose, so i just applied it (only partially i figured out eventually that i could use parking=surface for most of the parking errors i made in the past), its my first time using the tool so its very possible i misunderstood something. Sorry if that's the case :)
JuanElDemografo (2026-01-29 04:31:37+00:00): I don't know what the UI in osmose is, but it sounds like it was suggesting any tags of the form parking=* and tunnel=* (where * can be any appropriate value).

Looking more closely at way:420442473 where you applied key=tunnel, it would be better to split it into multiple ways where it goes through the building, adding the tag covered=yes to the segment which goes through the building. It seems you added a layer=-1 tag presumably to make an error with it intersecting a building go away.

I hope this helps!
Bananax47 (2026-01-29 06:57:33+00:00): I'll be doing that then thank you
silversurfer83 (2026-01-29 16:24:13+00:00): Hi Bananax47,

please only apply "fixes" that you understand. Those tools don't know everything since reality sadly is rather messy. It's absolutely OK to just leave things as they are if you don't know yet, what happens when you click "fix".

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177794189
MassCartog (2026-01-28 14:38:53+00:00): Hello skoocoom, I can see you have been removing lot and lots of "inaccurate" tiger tracks. Some do indeed look inaccurate, with no tracks insight. But a lot of them look like they follow an existing track. Could you explain why you are removing all these tracks that seem to still exist?
NeisBot (2026-01-28 10:39:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13506057531 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Traiteur ToqEvents"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : "Traiteur ToqEvents"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
9_tab (2026-01-28 18:25:32+00:00): The building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92839163 is shared by other businesses, so it shouldn't have that name.
NeisBot (2026-01-28 10:39:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13176414438 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Roubenka Pod Žítkovským vrchem"
---
Například více neutrální a faktická verze tvého textu by mohla být: "Roubenka Pod Žítkovským vrchem"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-06 06:06:34+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178169398
(No visible changes after review)
Frans S (2026-01-28 10:30:19+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please try to decide how to tag the traces of roads/paths, Wider than 2,5 mtr =unclassified + unpaved, narrower  tag it as a path.
Use the Bing imagery for a better view, but align the roads with the project imagery please.
Best regards and
cquest (2026-01-29 10:21:05+00:00): Bonjour,

Tout d'abord merci pour vos récentes contributions.

J'ai apporté deux corrections:
- amenity/education=college au lieu de university, réservé aux universités
- ajout du prefix téléphone international +33

Merci d'y penser dans vos prochains ajouts.
mueschel (2026-02-05 18:59:09+00:00): Hi,
"parking:for" is new.
But we already have https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:customers which might be exactly what is needed here.
Robert Whittaker (2026-02-05 23:36:03+00:00): Ah, thanks for the tip. I hadn't come across customers=* before. I agree that would be better here. Feel free to change the tagging if I don't get there first.
Senihtu (2026-04-20 17:48:28+00:00): In OSm we avoid abbreviations. Lohmener Str. should be Lohmener Straße
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-04-21 06:59:44+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for bringing this to our attention, the correction has now been made.

Best regards
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-04-21 10:20:23+00:00): Thank you again for the feedback.

In addition to the fix already applied, we are updating our address-normalisation process to reduce this type of issue, and we documented the current behaviour here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Digital_Bricks_POI_visibility#Address_normalisation

Best regards
mrpulley (2026-02-28 10:48:46+00:00): Just letting you know I recently https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178405682 removed the path tag. It was a path once, but is now abandoned and revegetated
uvi (2026-01-29 17:02:49+00:00): Wann werden die Änderungen wirksam? Trifft es noch andere Gebäude (und auch die Straße)?
ode1109 (2026-01-29 17:20:22+00:00): Es trifft alle Gebäude Pottensteiner Str. 26-30a.
Und es kommt noch ein Gebäude dazu den Weg weiter.  Eigentlich ist es schon gültig aber aktuell gelten noch beide Adressen
uvi (2026-01-30 03:54:50+00:00): Da hast du es ja schon (fast) ferfekt angepasst. Der alte Straßennname und die alte Hausnumer verbleiben mit dem Prafix "old_" . Ich ahb e es für dieses Haus einmal angepasst. Traust du dir es für alles andere zu? Wenn nicht, dann stetze einfach auf jedes Haus und auf den Straßennmane eine Fehlermeldung. Dann werdenn sich andere drum kümmern ;) Aber selber machen macht auch Spaß: Tipps für die ersten Schritte gibt es zum Beispiel unter https://learnosm.org/de/ . Hilfe gibt es unter https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56 (das ist lediglich die deutsche Seite, da gibt es verschiedene Länder-Communitys) und im Wiki unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/ . 
VG Uwe
ode1109 (2026-02-02 08:56:29+00:00): Ich habe die Änderungen nun eingetragen, soweit es mir bekannt ist. Bei der 28 und 28a weiß ich nicht welches der beiden Häuser die Nummer 2 und 4 bekommt. Ausserdem ist in der Karte ein neu entstandenes Haus nicht drin. Das wäre dann die Nummer 7
uvi (2026-02-02 16:56:23+00:00): Sieht doch gut aus!!! Du könntest (da die Luftbilder das neue Hazus noch nicht darstellen) diese Adresse auch nur mit einem Adresspunkt (anstelle des Husumrisses) erfassen. Dann ist die Adresse erfasst und der Umriss kommt später
ode1109 (2026-02-02 20:33:35+00:00): Habe jetzt alles mal geändert, so wie es mein Wissensstand ist. Sieht nun gut aus.
eggie (2026-01-28 09:43:07+00:00): Dag Henrico  Waarschijnlijk bedoel je oneway:bicycle=no  Dus de uitzondering voor fietsers.
bicycle=yes gaat niet helpen. Ik heb het aangepast.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-28 09:44:40+00:00): Nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
mtmail (2026-02-10 20:12:35+00:00): The postcodes in this changeset are not 5 digit number. Is it possible to correct that easily with JOSM? Found on https://nominatim.org/qa/#map=14.50/49.89/6.47&layer=postcode_bad_format
wies1 (2026-02-11 06:15:56+00:00): Hallo,
Ups, was ist mir denn da passiert. Danke für den Hinweis - habe die PLZ soeben korrigiert. Ja es ist möglich einen solchen Fehler, wie hier, mit JOSM ganz leicht zu korrigieren.
Gruss
wies1
mtmail (2026-02-11 22:44:11+00:00): Super, vielen Dank. Sonst hätte ich es mit Overpass Turbo und level0 probiert. JOSM nutze ich nicht oft genug.
WaffleR_zero (2026-01-29 11:08:07+00:00): Hello, please use a descriptive changeset comment.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
voschix (2026-04-19 21:42:54+00:00): What is the source of the house numbers?
NeroCarbone (2026-04-21 15:06:18+00:00): Local knowledge and site inspection.
Furthermore, I don't understand why the roads are back under construction when the road is open and passable.
eggie (2026-01-28 11:36:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  In OSM Nederland hoef je geen adressen toe te voegen. Er zijn al adresnodes. Ik heb het adres weer verwijderd.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
AndyB_66 (2026-01-28 10:09:52+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Wise_Turtle (2026-01-28 10:32:28+00:00): Просьба писать более подробные комментарии к пакетам правок. Ссылка на обсуждение комментариев  в телеграме https://t.me/ruosm/951961
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-28 22:42:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1303564354

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-28 23:22:08+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1303564354

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-28 22:42:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13506262047

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-28 23:22:09+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13506262047

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2026-01-28 10:06:13+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (4 changesets) shows that 356 of your last 398 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23750472
NeisBot (2026-01-28 10:39:54+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13506265014 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Asphalt paver"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-06 06:06:36+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178169399
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-01-28 10:39:55+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13506263634 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Health Center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-06 06:06:37+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178072918
WaffleR_zero (2026-01-29 11:04:56+00:00): Hello, this changeset comment is very inappropriate
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-27 11:11:03+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and other mistagging for Lucid Private Offices POI in changeset 184688138

https://osm.org/changeset/184688138
NeisBot (2026-01-28 10:39:56+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13506285812 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Luxury accommodation"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-06 06:06:37+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/177827536
Nikan Zeyaei (2026-01-28 10:31:27+00:00): Also add phone
NeisBot (2026-01-28 10:39:58+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13506285812 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Hotel accommodation"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisBot (2026-01-29 07:01:55+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1017369434 v1 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1017369430 v1 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/9383891034 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177799219
NeisReview (2026-02-06 06:06:42+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178040410
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-30 08:03:50+00:00): Revert adding SEO spam tags with blatant advertising and malformed values in changeset 184840088

https://osm.org/changeset/184840088
onterof (2026-02-01 17:06:04+00:00): Hallo, die Fläche hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1471924620 wurde als WKA getaggt, allerdings gibt es bereits eine Knoten, der korrekt mit den relevanten Dingen getaggt ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/339884128
Die Fläche drumherum erzeugt ja keine Energie und wird üblicherweise so nicht getaggt. Hab das mal zu landuse=industrial geändert.
Ansonsten gerne auch etwas aussagekräftigere changeset Kommentare benutzen.
Grüße.
NeisBot (2026-01-29 07:01:57+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 17 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1119787826 v3 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1119787825 v3 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1119787824 v3 | 5 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177800265
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-28 23:22:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4449846436

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Marek-M (2026-01-29 09:40:38+00:00): Poprawione :)
Akkurator (2026-04-28 12:16:45+00:00): MOBI is for 8 up to passengers, no fixed schedule, on demand

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bus=yes?uselang=en
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:psv
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:psv

<quote>
bus=* - heavy public service vehicle with more than 12 seating positions (typically 30 or more)...
minibus=* - for services with fixed schedule and fixed route
share_taxi=* - for services with flexible schedule (on demand) or flexible route (semi-fixed or negotiated with passengers)
</quote>

So for MOBI share_taxi seems more suitable, IMHO
Branko Kokanovic (2026-02-01 11:48:54+00:00): Zdravo,
Da li znas za DINA alat? https://dina.openstreetmap.rs Tu imamo zvanicne geometrije ulica i po tome smo uradili celu Srbiju. Imamo i nasu podlogu gde mogu da se vide RGZ ulice. Ovo sto si sad dodao ime na zapadni krak nije bas Viogorska - ni po geometriji, ni po zgradama sa te zapadne strane. Ostavio sam, ne bih da brisem, nego da znas za ubuduce da imamo alat gde mozemo da proverimo geometrije ulica! Hvala
---
Hi,
Do you know for DINA platform? https://dina.openstreetmap.rs There we have street geoemetries and this is how we fixed whole Serbia. We also have our own layer where you can see RGZ (cadastre) streets. Name you added on west part of this street is not technically Viogorska - neither from geometry nor looking at surrounding buildings on that west side. I left it as-is, but you should know that we have this tool where we can check street geometries. Thanks!
pavel_shturm (2026-02-01 12:06:00+00:00): Thank you for clarifying my error in the description.
pavel_shturm (2026-02-01 12:10:37+00:00): Could you provide a more precise link with street geometry? The website is not intuitive, and I couldn't find a map.
Branko Kokanovic (2026-02-01 12:24:29+00:00): So, on main site, you navigate to "Ulice" (streets), then to "Dnevni izvestaj" (daily report), then pick municipality (admin_level=8 basically) and inside pick settlement (admin_level=9). There is street listing (which you can order, filter...). Clicking on street name in second column you will have geometries of cadastre street (red color) and conflated OSM street (blue color). On each page in DINA, there is "Pomoc" in top menu which is different for every page and explains that page. We already imported and fixed all streets as you can see (97% done and rest of 3% is mostly impossible due to cadastre errors). Let me know for any questions you might have!
pavel_shturm (2026-02-02 14:50:52+00:00): Thanks for the detailed instructions! Do I need to remove the street name from this section of road?
Branko Kokanovic (2026-02-02 15:45:54+00:00): No need, it's not that big of an error. My comment was more in the spirit "hey, this thing exist, do not blindly change street names:D"
Tomas Straupis (2026-01-29 07:20:42+00:00): Ne, šita gatvė nėra Lvivo, čia privažiavimas prie namų (t.y. be pavadinimo).
Benaaasaaas (2026-02-02 12:14:37+00:00): Assuminau kad yra kadangi visi namai esantys toj gatvėj turi lvivo g. adresus, suprantu kad gaunas jog ji išsišakoja
Tomas Straupis (2026-02-02 12:22:47+00:00): Savivaldybė konkrečiai nurodo, kurios gatvės yra gatvės, o ne privažiavimai. Arba kitaip: kurios gatvės turi pavadinimą, o kurios yra tiesiog be pavadinimo. Aplink esantys namai/adresai nieko nekeičia :-) Vilniuje mes pusiau automatu tvarkom gatvių pavadinimus/adresus, tai tikimybė, kad kažkas negerai su duomenimis yra nors ir ne nulinė, bet kažkur netoli to ;-)
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-19 10:23:15+00:00): Reverted incorrect maxweight:hgv tag to proper maxweightrating:hgv, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178091262
 #OptimoRoute
DrSegatron (2026-01-28 22:15:57+00:00): Should also fuel:b7 be fuel:diesel_b7?
mueschel (2026-01-28 23:05:51+00:00): In my opinion yes, but if you look at the tag statistics both b7 and diesel_b7 are used almost equally often.
Taya_S (2026-01-29 08:42:10+00:00): Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19716
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-19 10:22:25+00:00): Reverted incorrect maxweight:hgv tag to proper maxweightrating:hgv as fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178091312 #OptimoRoute