piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mvanwensen (2025-06-06 09:19:15+00:00): Vanaf de westelijke aanrijdroute, de Delpratsingel mag je als automobilist alleen rechtdoor en fietsers alleen rechtdoor en rechts (vrij). Dus daar zou ook een except op moeten denk ik dan? Of had je dat al gedaan?
eggie (2025-06-06 09:28:29+00:00): Yep daar staat except=bicycle;moped,mofa;emergency
eggie (2025-06-06 09:30:32+00:00): Ahh  gelijk een typo eruit gehaald
bicycle;moped;mofa;emergency
eggie (2025-06-06 09:34:06+00:00): Quote
Vanaf de brug moge auto's alleen rechtdoor en linksaf; fietsers alle richtingen en lijnbussen alleen naar links. Om het eenvoudig te maken ;)


Je bedoelt lijnbussen alleen naar rechts vanaf de brug.. ?
Dan is het nu correct getagd in dat laatste geval.
mvanwensen (2025-06-06 09:38:10+00:00): Correct! Goed gezien!
eggie (2025-06-06 09:45:27+00:00): Mooi.. geen garantie dat de routers er wat mee doen.
Hier werkt het in ieder geval... 
Probeer maar met de verschillende bekende routers. Tweewielers zijn uitgezonderd van linksafslaan. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=51.73564%2C4.544225%3B51.736042%2C4.54518#map=19/51.735840/4.544700
eggie (2025-06-06 09:46:54+00:00): Je kunt pas over een week .. soms langer checken of het werkt.
De hulpdiensten gebruiken over het algemeen LiveNav en die kan als het goed is er mee omgaan.
eggie (2025-06-06 10:10:53+00:00): Denk dat except=moped er weer af kan, maar mapillary is wel gedateerd. (2019)
Daar zijn de uitzonderingen alleen voor fietsers .. en het hele centrum is inmiddels op de schop geweest.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=16.665980480878314&lat=51.593007855315&lng=4.7804202539376&pKey=177602060909365&focus=photo&x=0.5469010879309741&y=0.4495438318943885&zoom=1.1606002279413656
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-06 16:54:10+00:00): I removed also check_date:footway:surface, footway:surface

These are both not needed if that it is just footway and also make it look like cycleway:surface is missing
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-06 16:51:45+00:00): dzięki za poprawkę!
InsertUser (2025-06-07 13:54:18+00:00): So this facility that exclusively describes itself as a gallery on its website, isn't a gallery?
itsblakebelcher (2025-06-07 16:20:32+00:00): I’m not sure what you’re referring to, but the website clearly identifies itself as a museum in multiple areas. Additionally, you’ll note that it’s quite common globally for national galleries to operate as museums.
InsertUser (2025-06-24 00:01:36+00:00): Which pages on their website say this?
itsblakebelcher (2025-11-21 17:56:59+00:00): Several pages identify NAGB as a museum: https://nagb.org.bs/about/mission-vision-values/
https://nagb.org.bs/about/
https://nagb.org.bs/faqs/
demon_box (2025-06-06 11:37:02+00:00): Ciao AE16, ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti un edificio può avere più entrate e di conseguenza più numeri civici. 
Quindi hai 2 opzioni: 
1. Se conosci esattamente la posizione (entrata) del civico che stai mappando metti tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su un nodo del perimetro dell'edificio (aggiungendo anche il tag entrance sullo stesso nodo);
2. Se invece non hai questa informazione così precisa devi mettere tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su nodo adiacente ma STACCATO dal poligono dell'edificio.
Perciò per l'intero edificio del centro commerciale ho già proceduto con le correzioni del caso. 
Grazie e BuonMapping!
Pilsetkartetajs (2025-06-10 20:46:54+00:00): Sveiki!
Atkal atcēlu subjektīvu bicycle=* vērtību pievienošanu. Lūgšu atkal izlasīt pievienotajā izmaiņu kopā šo vērtību nozīmi: osm.org/changeset/143231730

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167463503
habib_amir (2025-06-09 13:28:18+00:00): Спасибо, конечно, что переименовали остановочные пункты, но кто будет заполнять теги old_name? Вот захочу я найти о.п. 2716 км и не смогу.
Bobropiton (2025-06-09 13:52:15+00:00): обсудили в чате. old_name ищите на точках railway=halt/railway=station
eggie (2025-06-06 09:00:54+00:00): Oke, ..

Verboden linksaf. 
Wanneer dan er een uitzonderingen voor tweewielers en bus is (ik zie geen busroute hier) dan kun je toevoegen op de relatie except=bicycle
except=moped
except =mofa
except=bus
en waarschijnlijk except=emergency
Maar Je mag ook niet rechtsafslaan..

Dan zijn de afslagbeperkingen hier verkeerd
Het zal een 'alleen rechtdoor beperking moeten zijn uiteraard met de uitzonderingen.
We kennen eigenlijk geen verboen linksaf en rechtsaf bebording meer.
mvanwensen (2025-06-06 09:12:41+00:00): Ik heb wel gelijk een complexe situatie uitgekozen om te fixen... 
Fijn dat je mee denkt/helpt!
eggie (2025-06-06 09:18:33+00:00): Volgens mij is het nu aangepast met de uitzonderingen. Je zou nog even de relaties kunnen  checken. Inloggen lukte net niet wegen een overbelaste server.
Entbert (2025-09-16 19:54:42+00:00): Das Zs 103 ist vermutlich keins? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12890470791
MrKrisKrisu (2025-09-16 19:58:57+00:00): Korrigiert in #172033002
stundenuhr (2025-06-06 09:08:22+00:00): PLanes erlaubt leider nicht, einen Kommentar bei der Änderung einzugeben, daher dieser Nachtrag:
parking:left:restriction weggelassen, weil Wert nicht einheitlich
Comino (2025-06-06 14:39:48+00:00): Hi notmyproblem1,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Only use "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read : https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants

Happy mapping,

Edwin
notmyproblem1 (2025-07-20 08:46:12+00:00): done ty
mvanwensen (2025-06-06 09:24:23+00:00): In Relatie: 19216771 Versie #2 lijkt in de exception nog een typefout te zitten die ik niet aangepast krijg: emegency ipv emergency.
eggie (2025-06-06 09:35:25+00:00): Ah oke...  Ik heb net nog een puntkomma verbeterd. 
Moet ook alles nog doorlopen.
Vier ogen is in ieder geval beter dan twee ogen
eggie (2025-06-06 09:38:21+00:00): Wanneer je in editor JOSM 1x iets verkeerd typt dan onthoudt josm dat. vandaar. Ik heb er nog zo'n typo uit gehaald.
Langlaeufer (2025-06-10 09:31:35+00:00): Hallo, wo hast du denn die Beschilderung Gehweg + Radverkehr frei gesehen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/281295885
Langlaeufer (2025-06-10 17:23:27+00:00): Der rechte Radweg ist separat gezeichnet - der vorherige Eintrag war richtig. Es fehlte nur das sidewalk:left=no
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167256543
mvanwensen (2025-06-06 09:26:22+00:00): Deze lijkt correct te zijn met de situatie ter plaatse.
kabelhaai (2025-06-07 16:37:56+00:00): Luchtbeelden?
Jakka (2025-06-08 07:55:30+00:00): ja
kabelhaai (2025-06-08 13:39:04+00:00): Heb trouwens vorige week een mail gestuurd maar ADV die het heeft laten weten aan de gemeentes/AWV. Hopelijk snel beschikbaar op GRB. Welke luchtbeelden?
Jakka (2025-06-08 16:48:56+00:00): "Digitaal Vlaanderen voorlopige luchtfoto's" ik werk met josm en deze laag lang geleden toegevoegd.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-11 03:19:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205763490/history - skąd pomysł że ten kod to nazwa drogi?

jesteś pewien że ten kod jest wyraźnie oznakowany? (patrz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:unsigned%20ref )
BRD-ZDP (2025-06-16 06:37:30+00:00): Dziękuję za wiadomość, poprawione
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-17 08:50:52+00:00): dzięki wielkie za poprawki!
NorthCrab_upload (2025-06-06 09:30:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12890571052
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/779278970

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mavl (2025-06-06 14:40:56+00:00): Здравствуйте. Поясните, пожалуйста, почему были удалены теги name:ru и name:ru:word_stress? Например:  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3208382772/history  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/300431924/history  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2575953232/history  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2575953228/history  
  
У этих ключей неправильные значения?
Bobropiton (2025-06-07 19:02:54+00:00): Приветствую. Исправлю в ближайшие часы.
Виноват. Попали под удаление более неактуальных мультиязычных километровых пунктов
Bobropiton (2025-06-07 22:22:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167329629
mavl (2025-06-08 16:10:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167358296
Jrachi (2025-06-07 07:22:25+00:00): Ciao.
A parte la stranezza di esplicitare la lunghezza di un percorso su un database geografico...(chiamiamola una scelta infelice).
A parte che usare tale tag con tre cifre decimali significa certificare la lunghezza al millesimo di chilometro, ovvero con una risoluzione di un metro...
Dovresti aggiungere il ruolo guidepost quando inserisci un guidepost ad una relazione.
Si tratta di un errore, anche se iD non lo segnala...

Ivo
Paolo Camporotondo (2025-06-07 08:02:31+00:00): Grazie Ivo dei suggerimenti, per quanto riguarda i decimali (discussione già fatta temp fà) dopo il punto .  il software waymarked come puoi vedere dagli allegati inserisce i km corretti indicati, faccio presente che molti altri mappatori inseriscono i"km 5.000= km 5.0",
per quanto riguarda il ruolo guidepost pian piano li stò inserendo con aggiunta di foto ecc.
P.S. Se posso fare anch'io un osservazione noto che nei percorsi inseriti da te i tag
duration:backward	
05:00 
duration:forward	05:00

sono tutti identici ?? strano con certi dislivelli.....
vedi per esempio ref:REI	EALA1050
Ti ringrazio delle tue osservazioni
Buon fine settimana
Cordiali saluti.
Buon Lavoro
Paolo
Jrachi (2025-06-07 08:08:27+00:00): Se guardi meglio la cronologia, vedrai che lew duration le ha inserite AlfredoSP nel 2016.
Personalmente evito di inserire dati opinabili ed incontrollabili come il tempo necessario per percorrere un percorso.

Ivo
Paolo Camporotondo (2025-06-07 08:17:15+00:00): Le validazioni in Osm2Cai risultano a tuo nome, comunque sono sempre ben accette le tue indicazioni, l'importante che siano costruttive e non polemiche che non portano a nulla.
Grazie di nuovo.
Paolo
steveman1123 (2026-03-15 04:42:01+00:00): Can you describe the rationale for changing Atlantis from climbing=crag to climbing=sport_centre?
I believe it should be "crag" or "area" based on the wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Climbing
Reino Baptista (2026-03-15 08:02:06+00:00): Hi,
Please have another look at  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317804876/  

I did not change the climbing=* tagging.  

What I added was leisure=sports_centre. I agree this may not be the ideal tag, but it at least indicates that the place is used for sports activities.  

I also removed area=yes because the feature is already mapped as a closed way (polygon). In addition, climbing does not occur across the entire area but only in a few specific spots.  

Given this, could you please clarify what changes you would prefer me to make?
steveman1123 (2026-03-15 10:40:11+00:00): My bad, it's liesure=sports_centre that was added.
I think it may make the most sense to remove that tag and change to climbing=area and add sport=climbing to indicate the sport related activities

If we want to get real fancy, I think we could also add the other nearby climbing areas to the relation type=site called "Queen Creek Canyon", but that could also wait until mlre areas are added to the map
Reino Baptista (2026-03-17 10:15:30+00:00): Great. I completely agree.
Suggested changes have been made.
RB👋
Una tantum (2025-07-15 14:19:26+00:00): Ciao Lomba93, purtroppo le immagini su StreetComplete sono temporanee, ma quella della  Cappella di Sant'Anna (759979299) sarebbe utilissima! Potresti caricarla su Wikimedia Commons per favore? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard
Una tantum (2025-07-15 14:20:54+00:00): La policy è qui: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#Are_the_pictures_taken_with_StreetComplete_permanent?
eggie (2025-06-06 10:12:30+00:00): Oke....denk het ook  en bicycle=no is dan overbodig, want in OSM is dat default op highway=footway

Mapse
eggie
Office de Tourisme la Palud-sur-Verdon (2025-06-06 10:27:31+00:00): Erreur dans le commentaire !
SomeoneElse (2025-09-06 12:49:09+00:00): Hello,
What was the source of the change here? The "imagery used" on the changeset was Bing Maps Aerial; were you able to use that as a source?
Best Regards,
Andy
AH9999 (2025-09-09 09:50:58+00:00): Hi, yes on streetview you can see the changes match now as were previously incorrect
SomeoneElse (2025-09-09 18:29:06+00:00): Unfortunately, we can't use Google Streetview for licensing reasons (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google ), and any data added as a result of that will need to be reverted and redacted.  Was that the source that you used for the change here?
eggie (2025-06-06 12:23:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
dafto8 (2025-06-06 13:01:23+00:00): moge wyslac zdjecie co to jest, nie wiem wlasnie jaki typ drogi to ma byc
savsk (2025-06-06 13:09:17+00:00): To jest najprawdopodobniej wyjeżdżona ścieżka dla pojazdów budowlanych, nie ma ani nie planuje się tam jeszcze żadnej drogi.
silversurfer83 (2025-06-06 17:55:49+00:00): Hello there :)

you have flagged this changeset as "review requested" so here comes a review:

It isn't wrong to delete objects that have been demolished. Yet, since we make good use of aerial imagery and also ALKIS data (where available), we keep the outlines of these buildings until there's new imagery available. What we do is adding so called lifecycle prefixes as described here
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

If you change "Building=yes" to "razed:building=yes" it disappears from most maps yet mappers still see the outline and with a "note=this building has been torn down YYYY-MM-DD" people won't add the buildings again.

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167260767
user_5359 (2025-06-06 14:44:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I revert your change set, because you are NOT a church!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-27 10:24:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236310963/history - czy to rzeczywiście jest nazwa całego budynku?

nie lepiej by railway=signal_box było z swoją nazwą jako osobny obiekt?
Anas masuris (2025-11-27 13:29:11+00:00): Tak, nastawnia zajmuje cały budynek - nastawnia to nie jest tylko biurko z monitorem, tylko dochodzą jeszcze do tego pomieszczenia automatyków, dyżurnego ruchu, zwrotniczych, urządzeń komputerowych (największa część), kablownia TT, agregat, rozdzielnia itp. Wszystko to, co ma zapewnić sprawne sterowanie ruchem kolejowym
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-27 18:45:48+00:00): to że zajmuje cały budynek to jedno - ale to chyba nadal nie jest nazwa tego budynku, prawda?

tylko samej nastawni
Anas masuris (2025-11-27 19:53:53+00:00): Może jeszcze raz: nastawnia z definicji jest budynkiem lub pomieszczeniem, więc nazwa budynku jest tożsama z nazwą nastawni w tym przypadku - tak samo jest w przypadku LCS Łowicz Główny (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/913444481), LCS Gdańsk Główny (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256200658), LCS Poznań Główny (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187916018), innych LCS i pomniejszych nastawni w Polsce.

A i żeby nie było, to w reszcie świata (Niemcy, Francja, Austria, Wielka Brytania, Finlandia, Austrialia, Stany Zjednoczone, Węgry, Słowenia, Chiny, Dania) (Czechy, Słowacja, Włochy, Japonia, Rumunia i Grecja jeśli wgl mają naniesione, to też xd) mają pooznaczane nastawnie jako budynki, posiadające tożsamą nazwę. Więc nie rozumiem, skąd ta wątpliwość
NateeT (2025-07-27 16:50:01+00:00): maybe:path? why?
julcnx (2025-07-28 02:19:48+00:00): Hi NateeT,
I’ve downgraded some paths I added based solely on public GPS traces, without proper surveys, after receiving complaints. While many lead to real trails, some are just shortcuts, and others may pass through sensitive areas. I’ll eventually delete these maybe:highway=path entries—but no worries, any potential trails remain visible in the public OSM GPS traces layer. If you have on-the-ground knowledge of any segments, feel free to map them yourself and include tags like width and sac_scale to better describe them. Thanks for your understanding and contributions!
NateeT (2025-07-28 02:29:01+00:00): I see! That will surely get ride of some "improper" paths for sure. 

No worries, I'm back on-the-ground now and sure can help with that!

Thanks and happy mapping!
julcnx (2025-07-28 02:34:37+00:00): Great to have you back! If you are on facebook, I have setup a private trail info group where we discuss reports, mapping questions with the community. Feel free to join! https://www.facebook.com/groups/2136375696805680
Baloo Uriza (2025-06-09 13:25:29+00:00): highway=path would be a linear feature, not an area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167261463
Xavizard Knight (2025-06-07 16:11:29+00:00): Hello! Thank you for your contributions!

In this edit, you added a footpath way that goes through the backyard of the house near C/Sagrada Família, but then crosses a hedge barrier and goes to the backyard of another house.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1392655165

This seems incorrect. I do not live there, but for what it can be seen from the near Camí del Fornás and from aerial and topographical imagery, there is no way to cross that hedge barrier. The two backyards are two different and separate backyards with no apparent connection.

Also, you've mapped this way (and others within the backyards) with footway=sidewalk (which is incorrect because this way is not besides a road) and motor_vehicle=no (which is unnecessary; otherwise it would be another type of highway).

Do you have any sources that point to the hedge crossing being there?
squeaker_andrus (2025-06-10 12:37:21+00:00): Greetings, Xavizard Knight!
I think you are indeed right. In this changeset, I decided to change the polygonal pedestrian zones into linear objects and connect them to the nearest paths. I made the change, taking as a basis not only aerial photographs, but also previously made changes by other users. This is probably what confused me.
As for tags, this is really my mistake. I deleted the way that goes through the backyard and fixed the tags of the way which goes through the garden .
Thank you for bringing the mistake to my attention. I’ll be more attentive while editing. Also feel free to fix my edits if needed.
Sincerely, squeaker_andrus.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167262598
dzamper (2025-06-10 07:12:36+00:00): Nie ma potrzeby rozdzielania na osobne linie w miejscach gdzie na jezdni jest tylko farba (jak np. na Dubiela przy Niedziałkowskiego)
Marek-M (2025-06-10 16:24:35+00:00): Takie rozdzielanie jest wręcz niezgodne z zasadami OSM. Poprawiłem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167453178
wolfbert (2025-06-21 11:28:41+00:00): Please supply the source for this change. Rural streets are either named (usually signposted) or unnamed (in which case the place name is used in the address, but not on the street).
ALRam (2025-06-23 07:04:10+00:00): Hello, thank you for your comment, I made this change based on a complaint from our customer and this picture of the mapillary, where there is a sign with a name and an arrow (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=342291663983792&focus=photo&lat=47.0786959896931&lng=15.642898612914678&z=18.507914794498404&x=0.5094241013384991&y=0.45349828517093227&zoom=0). However, if I am wrong, please make a correction, as I could not find any other signs.
Thanks and have a great day!
wolfbert (2025-06-23 07:46:37+00:00): Hi, the sign on the image is a direction sign to the settlement, not a street sign. What did the customer complain about? The question of the street name is tricky. The official road directory does list a road "Mitterlaßnitz". Our address helper plugin (which is also based on offical data) lists the addresses as "place" (i.e. no street name). I'll try to get community input on this.
ALRam (2025-06-23 08:45:52+00:00): We would be grateful if you could help us sort this out, as the quality of the map data is also very important to us! Our client complained that he was confused about the names of neighboring streets, and since I could not find confirmation of the previous name and the only source was this nameplate, I changed it as it was indicated on the nameplate, which seems more correct since street names can be the same as place names.
wolfbert (2025-06-23 09:27:30+00:00): I have now checked in a village I know. The road directory lists roads without names with the settlement name. The best indication is to look at adresses of nearby houses, they will have addr:place instead of addr:street.

In iD you can set the background layer "basemap.at", which will give you road names. These names are not 100% accurate, as in this example. Also, they may deviate from the street signs and there can be a fair amount of confusion in areas where streets are being renamed (which happens as settlements grow).

Best practice I can think of is to tag such roads with noname=yes and no name. In any case, I would recommend to be very careful when editing names. Better inform the community, even we struggle at times when names are only known to locals.
ALRam (2025-06-23 09:43:30+00:00): Thank you, we will try to take this information into account.
SpinOff (2025-06-06 19:40:24+00:00): Hej. Nie sklejaj obszarów landuse z drogami i granicami, tak jak tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12891787628/
tux67 (2025-06-06 14:26:16+00:00): Hallo PweberSpeditionBrucker,

Vergleich mit welcher anderen Karte?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167264295
tux67 (2025-06-06 14:35:17+00:00): Wer auch immer versucht die Hausnummer 45 einzutragen. Sie war jetzt insgesamt 3x eingetragen. Bei OSM muss die Adresse eindeutig sein. 
Adressposition läßt sich im Liegenschaftskrataster einsehen. https://geoportal.moenchengladbach.de/geo/resources/apps/liegenschaftskataster/index.html?lang=de
Es sei denn jemand kann ein Foto von der Haunummer mit einer anderen Position posten.

Gruß tux67
Siehe auch dieses Changeset: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167266629
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167264295
tux67 (2025-06-06 14:59:24+00:00): PS.: Sollte es darum gehen die Position einer bestimmten Firma auf dem Campus zu erfassen, so ist es möglich einen Node and diese Stelle zu setzen und mit den notwendigen Details inklusive der Adresse zu versehen. Nur die Standalone Adresse darf es nicht 2x geben.
Im Zweifel einfach eine Note erfassen und das Anliegen schildern. Dann kann ein Mapper in der Gegend das Thema richtig umsetzen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Notes
KTim (2026-05-22 08:52:58+00:00): Hi,

You removed the state=proposed tag from cycle route 6 in this changeset. The last time I cycled this route, this specific section did not exist on the ground, and there was no signage available. Do you have updated information indicating that this has changed? The official website also states: "Ruta er ikke skiltet, med unntak av to korte strekninger."

If there is no new information available, I intend to change the status of this section to proposed:route.

Best regards,
Tim