piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
joey_geoloog (2024-02-01 20:01:21+00:00): Thanks, I do use the squaring tool (Q) as mentioned in your other comments. The shape this tool makes is usually larger than the points selected. If you have any advice on this id appreciate it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146956300
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-02 09:23:18+00:00): @Frans S, maybe I'm just missing something, but why did this changeset get a #REVIEWED_BAD ?

Please see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=146956300#17/-1.57447/29.05753
Frans S (2024-02-02 15:47:32+00:00): Sorry, I forgot to change the status back to 'good mapped' . With the other status I can send more info about improving mapping skills.

About your comment that a mapping becomes bigger.
The roofs of the buildings mapped here almost all have overhangs.

It is best to stay within the shadow lines while mapping. And, also of importance, zoom in to a minimum of 30 - 40 ft.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146956300
empty_child (2024-02-01 19:03:34+00:00): Добрый день, VAHE M

Пожалуйста, не указывайте в названии объектов подобное (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11577282669). Для топлива у нас есть ключ fuel:* (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fuel)
Frans S (2024-02-01 18:20:04+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings not squared.
When buildings are partly covered by trees, extrapolate the roofline.
Do not connect nodes of buildings to other features 


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146956927
Frans S (2024-02-01 18:24:57+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146956964
LockOnGuy (2024-02-01 18:53:26+00:00): Can you please provide source of the name on the ground, like a sign or plate?                   
As I survey, there is no Persian name here, and anything that can not be verified on the ground shall be removed.                   
Here is a picture of the outside of the building:             https://alhikmeh.org/yanabeemag/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/MS-3.jpg                  
And here is pictures of the inside, no persian as well:          
https://shiawaves.com/arabic/pics/15449-بالصور-مرقد-الصحابي-الجليل-سلمان-المح/                       
Regards.
user_12523467 (2024-02-01 19:17:57+00:00): This is a historic and tourist attraction site, same as all shrines in Iraq, they have a multilanguages name tags, removing multilanguges tags disregards the significance of the locations, your threatening to removing other languages name tag is undermining the integrity of the map and disregards the linguistic and cultural diversity that OSM aims to represent.
Your claims that there are no such names on the ground is not valid with this type of historical tourist attraction site, also you contradict yourself by deletion of name:fa in changeset (146934238) claiming that it is a foreign language, while keeping name:en, name tags of these historical site should reflect the tourists languages. Please stop vandalising OpenStreetMap by deleting multi languages name tags from tourist and historical places.
LockOnGuy (2024-02-01 19:47:41+00:00): >they have a multilanguages name tags,             
    Can you please specify where those names are? on the internet or on the ground?             
                 
"removing other languages name tag" is perfectly OK if that language isn't actually present - translations don't belong in OSM. You added a forign language that is not verifiable or present on the ground.               
If this building does have a Persian name in Persian script to go alongside the Arabic name, or written under it, or it exist in a plate or a sign at the location, then you can add it in name:fa tag. If there really is no Persian name, then it shouldn't have one in OSM.                   
if there is any Persian name of the place at the location s sign, plate, banner, or even in a brochure giving at that location or a Persian name written in an official website of the place or any other official government website please share it and we can use that exact name.         
Regards.
user_12523467 (2024-02-01 20:09:18+00:00): As you requested, after deleting the multi-language name tags and claiming to have surveyed this shrine, you can consult the Shrines Guide issued by the General Secretariat of the Shiite Holy Shrines in Iraq, an official government entity for tourists. This flipbook, specifically on pages 10 through 12, lists the Persian names of these shrines:

https://mzaratiraq.com/archives/3d-flip-book/%D8%AF%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%84-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%AD%D9%8A
LockOnGuy (2024-02-01 20:33:52+00:00): I can make an institution or a tourist company and register it officially in the government and print flip books for tourist to buy or get for free with a tour etc. that will not grant me the rights to rename objects hundred of miles away from me.          
So please again, Share anything that is present at the location.       
You can see the link you shared have the images of the places taken, and those images do not have any foreign Persian name.         
Regards.
user_12523467 (2024-02-01 21:35:20+00:00): It's crucial to recognize that historical and cultural sites often have names in multiple languages, reflecting the heritage and the diverse audience they attract. 

The General Secretariat of the Shiite Holy Shrines in Iraq, as an official government entity, provides documentation that is significant not just for tourists but also for cultural and historical reference. The inclusion of names in Persian (Farsi) for these sites in their publications is a clear indication of the site’s significance to Persian-speaking visitors and the historical ties between the site and Persian culture.

The principle of inclusivity within OSM allows for the representation of this cultural diversity. While physical signage is a direct method of verification, official publications by recognized authorities should also be considered valid sources for names in multiple languages, especially for sites with historical and cultural significance. 

Your concern about the potential for arbitrary renaming by unofficial entities is valid. However, in this case, the source cited is an official body responsible for the management and promotion of these sites. This distinguishes it from hypothetical cases of unauthorized entities attempting to rename locations.

Moreover, the presence of English names alongside Arabic ones in OSM for these sites suggests a precedent for including names in languages that serve the site’s visitors, even if those names might not be physically inscribed at the site. The goal of OSM should be to serve as a comprehensive, accessible, and inclusive resource that acknowledges the multifaceted identities of places, especially those of historical and cultural import.

Please understand that we volunteers who only do some edits in our spare time. I'm done discussing the obvious with you. I have provided all the evidence (that every rational person can understands) supporting the use of multilingual tags in historical and tourist places. If you wish, you can make a report to DWG, and let them decide whether your deleting of name:fa tags is a vandalism or not.
LockOnGuy (2024-02-01 21:58:26+00:00): Hi ChatGPT, Thank you for your detailed and professional wording. :D        
 As I stated above, Here in OSM follow the on ground and verifiability rule, you stated the important and the crucial need to have the Persian name at OSM, but if it's so important why the facility in subject did not add it at least in a small sign somewhere?              
I had went previously to this place in subject after went to the nearby arch and never saw anything in Persian written anywere in this location, nor even any Persian speaking person. By your wording describing such importance for the Persian name, I will assume they add it now, and for this, I will be visiting this place next week or so to verify the existing of Persian names at or in the mosque and will survey on the ground, untill that time, you are free to send anything to prove the Persian name exist on the ground, otherwise if I saw no Persian name at the ground in the mosque, I will remove it.      
About the you wanting me to report it to the DWG, you must understand that the DWG is volunteers, and you must try as much as possible to not waste their time with some naming issue that can be solve by following the wiki rules and communication.     
Regards.
opendcc (2024-02-02 07:50:43+00:00): reverted
YPGGUUY (2025-02-02 18:34:14+00:00): 该路是 G324 的信息来源?
BCNorwich (2024-02-02 08:01:07+00:00): Hi, Please don't add fiction to OpenStreetMap. I've removed the duplicate highway tagged as a motorway that you added.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-01 18:50:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066149648

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
dpolovinkin (2026-05-12 14:14:04+00:00): those are NOT fitness_station's lol, unclear why did you decide to add them there, just misleading people trying to find real ones. But you acc is blocked, so will probably get no answer, oh well
VictorIE (2024-02-18 07:20:29+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11577375541

When mapping power poles, the correct tag is power=pole

man_made=utility_pole can be used for other types of poles.
Glassman (2024-02-02 23:29:39+00:00): For road crossings of railways, use railway=level_crossing. For paths use railway=crossing. Also there are two paths that end just before the railway. In the middle of the northside of McAlister Community Park. If the paths actually cross the railway they should be connected with a node where the two cross. Can you look at this again? Let me know if you need help
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146958375
yawfle (2024-02-02 00:12:27+00:00): Hello ebbebb!
Please note that descriptive information about OSM features (such as a driveway) is provided by various tags that are understood by software using the data. The "name" field is not used for this, and in general driveways shouldn't be named. For more information, you can see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name

Cheers!
Glassman (2024-02-02 23:30:25+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146958572
eggie (2024-02-01 19:42:54+00:00): Dag Ron Ik heb access private bijgetagd
gr eggie
VeroenRon (2024-02-02 09:40:03+00:00): Bedankt Eggie, ook dit staat nu in het example boek
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-01 19:10:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1097011051

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-02-01 19:41:49+00:00): Hi Ron  Ik heb access=private bijgetagd. 

MVG
eggie
mcliquid (2024-02-01 19:40:49+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
YoungHiro45 (2024-02-01 20:07:40+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery
kwiatek_123 (2024-02-01 21:00:58+00:00): Cześć,
OpenStreetMap to baza danych realnych, ogólnodostępnych. Jeśli psie wycieczki to Twoje osobiste wycieczki to mogę zaproponować skorzystanie z https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/pl/ gdzie można tworzyć swoje prywatne mapy.
emersonveenstra (2024-02-02 11:39:12+00:00): Hi there,

You created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1245363651#map=19/47.64003/-110.74111 with no tags, could you please go back and tag it? Thanks!
amacmcgrann (2024-02-16 03:24:02+00:00): Done.
woodpeck (2024-02-06 23:20:38+00:00): Dear Avni Miftari, what is your source for naming a road inside Kosovo "Islam Lika" when it was "Fazli Grajqevci" before?
sanchi (2024-02-02 15:28:49+00:00): Hola
Como ya te he indicado en otro conjunto de cambios este tipo de carreteras con estas referencias no son tertiary sino unclassified. Como se indica en la wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas#Castilla_y_Le%C3%B3n
Por favor sigue lo que está indicado en la wiki
Lo revierto a su estado correcto.
Un saludo.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 07:03:25+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11577491348/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
TrickyFoxy (2025-04-29 08:48:50+00:00): fixed
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-01 19:50:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506438672
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153125626

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-02-01 19:59:47+00:00): Uitzonderingen tweewielers heb ik toegevoegd. Het zou anders niet goed routeren. 
mvg
eggie
VeroenRon (2024-02-02 09:39:24+00:00): Bedankt eggie. Duidelijk en ik heb het genoteerd in mijn example boek.
csimeona22 (2024-02-01 20:00:05+00:00): Correction: Source used was Mapbox Satellite (0.30; -2.69); Strava, Bing Streetside.
Branko Kokanovic (2024-02-03 16:46:37+00:00): hi, mirëdita!

Please do not change official names of these roads. We are at process of importing official road names from cadastre and this is not name of this road. You can add it as name:sq if you want. But can you please stop changing road names to Albanian. Thanks you
Branko Kokanovic (2024-02-03 17:03:14+00:00): I reverted your changes, but I left name:sq to all roads you added
AurélienQ (2024-07-08 13:10:00+00:00): Ben non, on cartographie pas l'historique, mais l'actuel. Le nom du village est donc Fournets-Luisans, et en plus on peut ajouter le nom du hameau qui est Fournet. Je corrige cela.
Si le passé t'intéresse, ta participation est volontier bienvenue sur OpenHistoricalMap.
Branko Kokanovic (2024-02-03 17:02:39+00:00): Similar to roads, please don't change names of places in Serbia to Albanian language. Thanks!
Branko Kokanovic (2024-02-03 17:03:07+00:00): I reverted your changes, but I left name:sq to all places you added
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-01 20:20:47+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Osiedle Pod Lipkami":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321680113
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321680203
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321680293
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321680349
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321680409
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321680764
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321680998

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Aurorose (2024-02-01 22:20:12+00:00): epic ty
kmpoppe (2024-06-26 10:04:53+00:00): Aktualisierte Quellen-URL:

https://www.autobahn.de/betrieb-verkehr/baustellenmeldung/a28-delmenhorst-neubau-einer-bruecke-im-autobahndreieck-delmenhorst
map per (2024-07-13 14:15:42+00:00): Hello YacoobPL,

are you sure this path is now a pedestrian area? On Mapillary from 2022 (1) the way is signed as a shared Foot- and Cyclepath (traffic_sign=DE:240). 

Thanks and best regards
map per

(1) https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1134778114020503&focus=photo&lat=48.145150999972&lng=11.615939600000047&z=1.5&x=0.8690740630074332&y=0.5136576203728052&zoom=3
eggie (2024-02-01 21:50:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
habi (2024-02-01 21:37:56+00:00): Nope, only note 4082248 and note 4082284...
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-01 21:50:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184991643
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293086759

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-01 21:50:19+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11513753635
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1245392070

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
5775 (2024-02-01 22:05:54+00:00): poporawione
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-01 22:20:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238948894

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
canfe (2024-02-02 05:45:35+00:00): Ma i pinti SMAT non son a pagamento?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146964070
i2004 (2024-02-02 00:52:15+00:00): se cambio el recorrido del 59
i2004 (2024-02-02 00:52:31+00:00): no da mas  la vuelta por cordoba el ramal 2
wille (2024-02-02 19:17:34+00:00): Olá, pressione a tecla Q após traçar um edifício para ortogonalizar os ângulos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146964236
michel60 (2024-02-03 10:23:45+00:00): Bonjour,
Je ne vois pas d'erreur Osmose quand on ajoute dans la relation les stations avec le rôle station. Pouvez-vous me donner des précisions ?
Cordialement
Michel
Alexb60 (2024-02-03 12:54:47+00:00): Bonjour,
Le rôle station est inexistant dans les relations route, il ne faut pas ajouter les stations dedans. La couche Public Transport Routes de l'outil OSM Inspector (https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=3.02721&lat=49.56900&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes) permet de visualiser les erreurs concernant les relations routes de transport public (bus, trains, etc.). J'ai donc retiré les stations des relations et réordonné ou comblé les trous dans les tracés.

Bonne journée
michel60 (2024-02-04 09:47:53+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour votre réponse. Je vais analyser les problèmes remontés sur mes modifications avec cet outil
Cordialement
Michel
citrula (2024-02-02 01:38:21+00:00): Please use changeset comments! :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146964475
M!dgard (2025-01-01 13:46:34+00:00): Hi, please only add Wikipedia links in the native language of the area you're adding them to. In Flanders we speak Dutch. Thanks!
Igor Bubelov (2024-02-02 02:00:46+00:00): Hello,

FYI: dates are supposed to use YYYY-MM-DD format, I'll fix it
Sculptures (2024-02-02 08:45:16+00:00): thanks
user_14538650 (2024-02-02 00:33:52+00:00): Thank you so much! Glad that you are micromapping this place.
ablevi202 (2024-02-02 01:01:09+00:00): thank you! although i think ive now reached the limit of what i can do with aerial imagery so if you have anything better feel free to add more.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-02 00:10:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292114460

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ZeLonewolf (2024-04-03 20:52:41+00:00): This change is not correct.  boundary and admin_level should not be set on boundary member ways.  They should only be applied to boundary relations.

For example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37572312
ZeLonewolf (2024-04-03 20:59:28+00:00): See discussion I just opened at

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/boundary-tagging-on-boundary-relation-member-ways/111345
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-02 00:40:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292412109

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀