piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
txemt (2025-10-25 23:44:46+00:00): They’ll always show, but the segments through the gates should prevent people from being routed through there. 

Heads up, though….there’s a lot of road construction going on in the port.
citrula (2025-02-02 03:33:30+00:00): Nice catch - I deleted a duplicate building and added websites for both. It looks like the address for Fiesta might be wrong, though? Their store locator says 2700 8th avenue, not 2716. Maybe worth checking out?
Frank Peng (2026-03-26 00:28:20+00:00): What was the purpose of this changeset? From what I can see, it looks like you deleted a parking area and remapped it as a multipolygon relation. It also looks like you merged a few sections of roads.
(Not trying to say it's bad. Mostly just curious.)

Please make sure to just modify the geometry of existing map elements instead of deleting them and remapping them anew, as it helps preserve an element's editing history on OSM. You could've just modified the geometry of the parking area you deleted in this changeset. Also, don't remove map elements you don't need or don't like.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_objects_that_you_don't_need_or_like
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162032204
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-02 02:40:39+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zawierać przedrostka. Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zaczynać się od 'ul.', 'ulica' itp. Należy usunąć przedrostek i pozostawić samą nazwę ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12550235576

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

Zasady nazewnictwa ulic w polsce:
https://wiki.osm.org/Pl:Znakowanie_dróg_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
TBKMrt (2025-02-02 02:43:54+00:00): geometry added & ticket done
AkuAnakTimur (2025-02-02 08:38:53+00:00): Kenapa delete?
Taya_S (2025-02-02 10:55:02+00:00): Hello,

Could you explain what you mean with "sdss". Did you read this? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Could you also explain why you deleted this building here and in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161963520 

Taya Snijder
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-02 02:50:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12550221697
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12550221700

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Zarr (2025-02-06 08:17:43+00:00): I think there may be an issue with this changeset with some of the commercial areas being converted to relations. It seems the area boundaries were converted to lines in a relation?
joel56dt (2025-02-07 16:51:16+00:00): Thanks. I assumed SCEE was updating this correctly. I'll fix these.
adlan2001 (2025-12-09 12:58:01+00:00): Hello. Do you mind if I turned Surau Nur Jihad point into mosque building?
BCNorwich (2025-02-02 06:54:14+00:00): Hi, There's no such agency on the side of the road just here. The website also suggests no office here. Thus I assume this is fiction and remove the node. If it's somewhere else I may be able to help, just ask here,

Regards Bernard.
citrula (2025-02-02 03:32:57+00:00): duplicate building*
felipeeugenio (2025-02-02 15:53:21+00:00): Buenas ediciones. gracias
Taksine (2025-02-02 04:51:47+00:00): Привет, ты должен обратить внимание, что отель, который ты хочешь нарисовать, уже существует. Пожалуйста, не добавляй его повторно.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 01:27:20+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165050719
Pasguy13 (2025-02-07 21:51:05+00:00): Hi sorry I am quite new here. How can I tag this way as “no right turn”?
TheSwavu (2025-02-07 22:31:59+00:00): There are already no right turns on this way:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12208167
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9089346

In the help menu in iD you will find an entry for relations, this has a description of how to add turn restrictions.
Pasguy13 (2025-02-07 22:35:37+00:00): Ok sorry I did not see that it already had a turn restriction. Thank you for clearing that up.
NeisBot (2025-02-06 10:34:33+00:00): Hi NHP1997616, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over the last days and weeks, you've made at least 138 with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
TrickyFoxy (2025-02-08 17:23:06+00:00): Снесённое/разрушенное здание это не свалка. was:building или что-нибудь другое отсюда https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
felipeeugenio (2025-02-02 15:41:24+00:00): Hola. Eso no es un living_street. Lo pasé a track.
saludos
yelisey90 (2025-02-03 08:42:53+00:00): per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dattraction and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:attraction , the tag tourism=attraction should not be added if the object with attraction=... is part of a larger attraction (Mtatsminda Park in this case)
evgenykatyshev (2025-02-03 09:05:08+00:00): I know, but this big wheel is observed from any point of Tbilisi and, in my opinion, can be considered as tourism=attraction. I didn't add this tag to other big wheels
citrula (2025-02-02 06:30:13+00:00): Please don't add fictional features to OSM

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162034661
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-02 14:16:21+00:00): Just a test?
JJIglesias (2025-02-02 07:09:56+00:00): Jajaja osea tu elimanas un cambio que yo hice estando en ESOS LUGARES hoy mismo y lo haces desde tu casa? EN SERIO? Convertiste un restaurante en 1 Bar QUE NO EXISTE, las Torres Orion SON 1 SOLO COMPLEJO de Apartamentos y otras cosas mas.

Es increible lo tuyo definitivamente.

Supongo que revertire nuevamente tu cambio.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-02 06:30:52+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1176927603

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frank Peng (2025-11-16 05:54:11+00:00): Please be aware of the "lanes=*" and "turn:lanes=*" tags on the Patton Drive ways. In this changeset, you merged Patton Drive way 221424565 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/221424565) tagged with "lanes=2" with its adjoining Patton Drive way (Way 1153637286 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153637286) tagged with "lanes=3", resulting in a single way from the Walmart parking lot to North Franklin Street. The "lanes=*" tag indicates the number of lanes on a road. For Patton Drive from the Walmart parking lot to North Franklin Street, it starts as two lanes and changes to three lanes coming up at the North Franklin Street/Patton Drive/Laurel Street intersection, as clearly seen in the aerial imagery. Patton Drive way 221424565 tagged with "lanes=2" corresponds to the two-lane section, and Patton Drive way 1153637286 tagged with "lanes=3" and "turn:lanes=left|left;through|right" corresponds to the three-lane section and the turn lanes. For the Patton Drive turn lanes coming up to North Franklin Street, the left lane is a left-turn lane, the center lane is a shared left and through lane, and the right lane is a right-turn lane. It would have been better to leave the Patton Drive way tagged with "lanes=2" (Way 221424565) on the map instead of merging it with its adjoining way with the same name.

I would encourage you to read these OSM Wiki articles on lanes and turn lanes tagging, so this is brought to your attention to keep in mind for the future:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn#Indicated_turns_by_lane
Frank Peng (2025-12-23 22:16:57+00:00): Changeset partially reverted because it deleted valid lane guidance for Patton Drive. This changeset merged the Patton Drive ways from the Walmart parking lot to North Franklin Street, causing incorrect lanes and turn:lanes tagging. This error would also be seen in JOSM (Java OpenStreetMap) with "Lane and road attributes" enabled in "Map Paint Styles", where you would see that the number of lanes on the way doesn't match that for each section of the road seen in aerial imagery.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175173665
I also aligned the roads to Bing imagery in a follow-up changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175175800 because Bing imagery is well aligned.
aharvey (2025-02-02 13:32:55+00:00): Please try to keep the history https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history of objects

This way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/898239664/history could have been retained and amended into the new way you added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356111699/history

Keeping the history makes it easier for others to understand the history of changes and to attribute those who contributed.
aharvey (2025-02-02 13:33:31+00:00): 2. It should be footway=crossing for the crossing sections not footway=sidewalk.
aharvey (2025-02-02 22:42:53+00:00): At a minimum could the backyard trampolines https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356111675/history be tagged access=private to indicate they aren't part of a public playground.
michael_ua (2025-02-02 17:47:00+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162056473
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 01:27:21+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165050719
aharvey (2025-02-13 22:49:43+00:00): hi the traffic cabinet was already mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12470392128 and you've added a duplicate, I'll add your new tags to the existing node.
Yunkers (2025-02-07 10:58:21+00:00): Ruszyła już budowa czy tylko podpisani ZRID?
5m4u9 (2025-02-03 04:53:46+00:00): Al fin, una descripción buena en el changeset... y no solo hashtags 😱.

no entiendo el ir en contra de la recomendación de desabreviar nombres (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(do_not)).
JJIglesias (2025-02-03 07:32:05+00:00): RECOMENDACION quiere decir que lo puedes hacer o NO lo puedes hacer. NO SIGNIFICA OBLIGATORIEDAD DE HACER.

Te sugiero que te leas el DICCIONARIO...
JJIglesias (2025-02-03 07:33:41+00:00): Y si PONGO Hashtags es EXACTAMENTE por la misma razon. Puedo poner LO QUE ME DE LA GANA, pues es una RECOMENDACION, No es obligatorio...
JJIglesias (2025-02-03 07:38:34+00:00): Quizas algun dia, mapees otra cosa que no sea la ciudad de Cochabamba y entiendas que en este mapa solo ciertas cosas son OBLIGATORIAS, todo lo demas es OPCIONAL y VALIDO, y NADIE necesita que tu vayas detras cambiando las cosas a TU CRITERIO, pues ese criterio NO es obligatorio, es OPCIONAL.

Que pongas 3 cosas a tu gusto en Cbba, no es ningun acierto si tienes 10.000 cosas mas en todo el pais y de las cuales NO te has preocupado en lo mas minimo...

Slds
5m4u9 (2025-02-08 04:17:42+00:00): no me sorprende tu actitud "que me importa el resto", yo soy el que edito más y hago mis reglas... lalala.

no has acabado de entender la idea de comunidad, por eso con todas las personas que converso, escapan de osm por cruzarse con tu actitud de policía de osm.

otra vez digo, que vos edites en todo Bolivia, bien,  bravo! pero no menosprecies las otras ediciones... aún si es en 5 m² y se edita 5 veces en el mismo y me equivoco 7 veces.

Yo edito en Cochabamba, porque me da la gana y uso todos los días el mapa.

No soy de las personas que editan en todo Bolivia, pero manejan sus autos en contraruta o hacen giros en U peligrosos y se graban en mapillary. Si eso es hacer mi gusto, bien.
englu (2025-02-03 16:59:52+00:00): Przebieg ścieżki https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/636608076 był lepszy przed poprawką. Ścieżkę widać nawet na zdjęciu satelitarnym geoportalu i przede wszystkim na heatmapie Stravy: https://www.strava.com/maps/global-heatmap?style=standard&terrain=false&sport=All&gColor=hot&gOpacity=90&labels=true&poi=true&cPhotos=false#18/52.020411/20.999009
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-21 07:40:13+00:00): Hello!

You used
surface=niet-bestraat2
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356113472/history

Have you maybe meant
surface=unpaved
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
michael_ua (2025-02-02 17:47:01+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162056473
Frank Peng (2026-01-13 17:22:17+00:00): Same issue as in several of your other changesets. Please do not delete existing roads and redraw them anew. It is good practice to just modify the geometry of the existing roads or retag the existing roads. You deleted a few driveways and service roads in this changeset and redrew them as parking aisles. The driveways and service roads you deleted in this changeset could've just been retagged to parking aisles. 

Please visit the FacilMap link of this changeset to see which roads you deleted and redrew: https://facilmap.org/#q=changeset%20162035595

In the future, please make sure to help preserve the history on OSM by just modifying the geometry of the existing roads instead of deleting them and redrawing them anew.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Filip009 (2025-02-03 09:31:59+00:00): Skúste pridávať aj tie relácie :)
VáclavS (2025-02-04 08:17:47+00:00): Musím si na to sadnúť. Potrebujem zadať cezhraničnú cyklotrasu, ktorú zrealizovali lesníci nad Driečnou, nejaký zárodok tam vidím - musím sa k  tomu dostať :)
Filip009 (2025-02-04 10:34:52+00:00): Preto by som najprv odporúčal pridávať relácie smerovníkom podľa smeroviek, ktoré sa na smerovníku nachádzajú. Ja vám to potom skontrolujem. A cyklotrasy sa potom vytvára podobne. Ale to by som robil až neskôr.
VáclavS (2025-02-04 11:43:07+00:00): U tých najnovších som už zadal relácie.
bxl-forever (2025-02-02 11:52:08+00:00): Hello,

I am afraid this changeset introduces arbitrary restrictions.  Under Belgian law, cyclists are not required to use cycle tracks or lanes if they change directions.  

Here is a concrete situation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23598324
A cyclist coming from the north may want to stay on the carriageway to enter the roundabout and make a left turn towards Is. Meyskensstraat.

By setting "bicycle=use_sidepath", you instruct navigation engines to no longer use that road.  Those engines will no longer offer this possibility and will force longer detours.

This is the reason why we always examine the routing graph instead of blindly applying this tag on any road with a cycle track nearby.

Could you please enlighten us about why you felt it was important to use this tag?  Did someone request to do it?  Is there something special here explicitely forbidding cyclists to enter the roundabout?

Thanks in advance.
JannesBraet (2025-02-02 12:04:56+00:00): The reason I did this, is because of wandrer, an osm based tool that tracks all the roads you have visited. And in the current situation there are 4 parallel roads that are all accessible, while in reality there are just 2.

I'll try to adjust the situation so that the routing over the roundabout still work
JannesBraet (2025-02-02 12:14:56+00:00): see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162043346#map=17/50.896326/4.311062&layers=D
bxl-forever (2025-02-02 17:26:35+00:00): Oh yes, Wandrer, again…

Thanks at least for trying to fix.  I’ll try to repair this area in the next days because there are still some strange issues (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356146574 will never be used).

Happy mapping.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-02 08:10:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12550842872
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/937526222

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2025-02-21 10:23:11+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
I am stepping in on this project and wonder what decided you to map the hedges here. I checked other tasks to know how hedges are recognized and mapped. In all cases, I checked there was a real visible trace of hedges.
I do not see them here. (not only on this task)
Please clarify this. 
When I observe these plots, I notice clear fields (task 10), except for the mapped hedges on the south part.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-02-21 10:35:54+00:00): Hello again. Please forget my previous message. I had Mapbox imagery in front of me which did not show the traces.
Best regards
King edgar (2025-02-21 19:02:16+00:00): Okay, no worries! Thanks for the clarification. Best regards.
Peter Newman (2025-02-23 17:32:08+00:00): As you may be local @VMPanes could you take a look at my note:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4638985
Kenkton (2025-02-02 08:41:04+00:00): Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-02 08:43:42+00:00): You're welcome.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-02-26 02:33:57+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17328
Edelsalami (2025-02-03 09:24:27+00:00): Hallo Nordgork alias Streetview247, du hast dich mal wieder an den Umrissen eines Naturschutzgebietes vergriffen und dieses stellt nun einen FALSCHEN Umriss dar. Kannst du bitte erklären warum du Änderungen vornimmst, die klar falsch sind? Bitte erkläre dich. Danke.
ivanbranco (2025-02-23 19:11:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162865415
nona mostafa (2025-02-26 13:55:44+00:00): Hi ivanbranco
Thank you for contributing
I updated "https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184072172" based on Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2025-01-29 but I agree with you revert changeset because the Last imagery with Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2025-02-17 the same edit for revert changeset "https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162865415"
Regards
nona mostafa
ivanbranco (2025-02-26 15:07:49+00:00): To be clear, I'm not the person who reverted the edit, I was just reporting it.

Happy mapping
Langlaeufer (2025-02-14 16:23:53+00:00): Hallo RSun,
auf der Elbbrücke liegen 9 Routenrelationen die durch deine Bearbeitung kaputt gegangen sind.
Keine Ahnung wie du das geschafft hast, weil iD das eigentlich zu verhindern versucht.
Schaffst du dass selber zu reparieren?
Langlaeufer (2025-02-14 16:32:16+00:00): Die Durchfahrt durch die Brückenpylonen würde ich auch nicht als Tunnel bezeichnen sondern als tunnel=building_passage ohne layer=-1
Langlaeufer (2025-02-14 16:34:22+00:00): Dieser Zaunverlauf ist so vermutlich auch nicht richtig, oder?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356119985
Langlaeufer (2025-02-14 16:36:20+00:00): das umtaggen in highway=cycleway von highway=path ist auch nicht unbedingt erwünscht.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren

Falls du Fragen hast, gerne an mich wenden. Grüße und weiterhin frohes Mappen Langläufer
Langlaeufer (2025-02-14 16:43:06+00:00): Noch eine kleine Anmerkung. Einige Stücken waren einfach nur als cycleway erfasst. Ein cycleway ist ein reiner Radweg. Ich habe foot=designated bicycle=designated für den gemeinsamen Rad-/Fußweg ergänzt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162036943
Langlaeufer (2025-02-15 10:16:18+00:00): Die Routen und Rad/Fußwege auf der Elbbrücke habe ich repariert, falsche Tags von der Brückenkonstruktion entfernt.
RSun (2025-02-15 10:48:04+00:00): Sorry für die späte Antwort - bei der Absenderadresse mit "norepeply" wusste ich erst nicht, wo ich antworten kann.

Vielen, vielen Dank für die Mühe, meine Fehler zu korrigieren. Ich hatte nicht beabsichtigt, die Relationen zu beeinflussen. Ich bin jetzt sehr vorsichtig damit, denn ich weiß auch nicht, wie ich es reparieren kann und ich möchte nicht Anderen unnötig Arbeit bereiten.

Oft ist es nicht möglich, einen Punkt zu änderm, der mit einem Objekt mit Relationen verbunden ist; Beispiel: Ein Radwanderweg mit vielen Relationen verläuft durch einen Park und hat einen gemeinsamen Punkt mit der Parkgrenze. Wenn ich den Verlauf dieser Begrenzung ändern will, ist das nicht möglich, weil ich den gemeinsamen Punkt nicht vom Radweg lösen kann - ich kann ihn nur auf dem Radweg verschieben (zwischen 2 nodes). Dabei ist dieser Begrenzungspunkt des Parks völlig irrelevant für die Relationen. Bei der Auswahl der Tags richte ich mich nach dem OSM-Wiki, so weit es dort erklärt ist. Gibt es eine bessere Erklärung/Übersicht, was man zu welchem Zweck verwenden sollte?) Rad-/Fußweg ist so eine Betrachtungssache ... ist es ein Radweg, auf dem man auch gehen darf oder ist es ein Gehweg, auf dem man auch radeln darf? ;-)
Ich habe jetzt erst im Auswahlmenü den Linientyp "Rad- und Fußweg" gefunden, der hat die Tags "bicycle=designated", "foot=designated" und "highway=path"
Ich nehme eigentlich die vorgeschlagenen Objekte aus dem Auswahlmenü, aber die Liste der Verschläge ist manchmal seltsam ...
Etliche Varianten (z.B. bei Gebäuden) haben keine sichtbaren Auswirkungen in der Karte (ich weiß, das ist abhängig vom Renderer), aber ich versuche trotzdem, exakt zu sein, damit der Eintrag in Datenbank korrekt ist.
Langlaeufer (2025-02-15 11:43:22+00:00): Hallo RSun, danke für deine Antwort.

Wenn iD sich weiget eine Linie zu bearbeiten die Teil einer relation ist musst du zunächst allle Mitglieder der Relation herunterladen. Wenn du einen Way mit Relationen selektierst, dann bekommst du gan z unten aufgelistet in welchen Relationen er enthalten ist. Dort gibt es auch jeweils ein Download-Knopf.
Bzgl. Tagging. manchmal ist sich die community nicht einig und auch die Editoren verfolgen unterschiedliche Ansichten und schlagen gegebenenfalls auch mal extrem Kontroverse Dinge vor. So ist es bei Rad- und Fußwegen. Von daher am besten auf Kritiken reagieren und dir die Dokumentation ansehen. (Den Link zu Erfassung von Radverkehrsanlagen hatte ich dir bereits weiter oben reingepackt)

Und nochmal wichtig. Exakt sein bei der Auswahl der Tags. Es muss nicht nur vom Wort sondern auch von der Bedeutung (hier an der Brücke z.b Pipeline und Geländer passten nicht) passen. Wofür die Tags stehen ist meist im Wiki erläutert. Bitte kein Tag nur deshalb wählen weil es im Renderer gut aussieht.
Frans S (2025-02-21 14:41:38+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please don't map a cluster of buildings an isolated dwelling. This area should be mapped as a 'landuse=residential' and a node tagging it as a hamlet., village , depending on the size.
Best regards
literan (2025-02-02 10:03:12+00:00): не надо наносить на карты людей
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 17:45:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12550913834/history - is amenity=fixme removable here?
smsm1 (2025-03-31 18:05:19+00:00): Yes the amenity=fixme should be removed. Thanks for spotting.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 18:14:18+00:00): removed, thanks for a quick reply!