piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jmarchon (2023-10-25 02:00:01+00:00): Oops, I didn't mean to remove that tag. Sorry, I'll add it back soon.
Glassman (2023-10-25 02:10:43+00:00): Thanks! - I mean how else will squirrels know there is a safe passage across the street without OSM :-)
arjunaraoc (2024-01-08 14:41:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my update: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146031752
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143044317
bdentremont (2023-10-25 01:10:46+00:00): Thanks for addressing my notes.
CloCkWeRX (2023-10-24 07:19:26+00:00): Nice work :)

As a tip, consider selecting the address node and the house you draw while holding shift, then using the "C" button to combine them.

Works well for single dwellings with one address, though apartment blocks or duplexes might be worth skipping
KevinOs (2023-10-30 18:45:13+00:00): Please stop adding in street names to alleyways and paths, it's confusing for everyone and really difficult to chase down your edits to fix. thanks
mrpulley (2024-07-10 13:23:58+00:00): Way 1093024688 looks like a private driveway. Was this maxspeed obtained from NSW Speed Data?
Ways 1028580913, 1093024704, 1028580915 and 1028580906 are maxspeed 70, not 100 (fixed by nm7s9 at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150580954, confirmed by myself May 2024).
Way 1062505800 is maxspeed 50, not 100.
Реdактор (2023-10-24 07:56:35+00:00): Исправляй!
Реdактор (2023-10-24 07:25:11+00:00): Зачем отменять
JJIglesias (2023-11-14 16:47:51+00:00): Saludos si haces un river area o un riverbank y existe un rio ya. Debes mover el rio para que entre dentro del area del rio q creaste, sino quedan como 2 rios diferentes lo cual NO es correcto, lo mismo con el segmento de via debe moverse y ajustarse el segmento de vado (ford) al area creada...
Gracias
mini-me (2023-10-24 06:48:08+00:00): Всё равно неправильно :)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Адреса#Нумерация_домов

Т.е. 503 к3 с1
augxcgrwxo (2023-10-26 11:08:48+00:00): this revert does not seem to work well, there are streets going into the sea
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-26 21:58:06+00:00): Thanks for pointing it out. Problem was caused by multiple reverts being done at the same time, but should now hopefully be fixed.
SomeoneElse (2023-11-28 20:58:03+00:00): I don't think your change here makes any sense at all - the previous edit was just fantasy mapping.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/potentially-problematic-edits-in-lottstetten/106514
jjyach (2023-10-24 13:05:29+00:00): Per the OSM standards wiki, please do not do this change to chambers as it is not CDOT listed arterials or State highways and are really just large collectors as they are not high speed links.  We have a large effort in place to correct this across the Denver metro area and Colorado.  

See:
highway=primary is used for the following roads not otherwise tagged as a higher classification (i.e. motorway or trunk):

CDOT-designated Principal Arterials (if not already a highway=motorway or highway=trunk)
CDOT-designated Minor Arterials

highway=secondary is used for the following roads not otherwise tagged as a higher classification:

CDOT-designated Major Collectors
US and CO Highways not already tagged above

Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Colorado/Highway_Classification
Luis Garcia-Lopez (2023-10-24 18:46:48+00:00): I have made the correct changes to the map based on these standards. According to CDOT, Chambers Rd, Hampten Ave, and part of Quincy Ave are listed as level 3 - Primary Arterial.
If you refer to this CDOT site, it can give you more information on the classification type under the FUNCCLASSID column: https://data-cdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/cdot::major-roads-1/explore?location=39.638445%2C-104.777780%2C13.71

I would recommend using this dataset when considering classification here on OSM.

I will go ahead and correct the piece of Quincy Avenue that I incorrectly classified based on these standards.
jjyach (2023-10-24 19:00:22+00:00): thank you for that resource as I could not find that info and all I had to go off was what the City/County deemed those roads as minor arterials.  I do beleive as well that we need to pull the CR 30 E off of much of Quincy too as that takes affect farther out east
osmviborg (2023-10-24 06:29:44+00:00): Mange fejl pga. 2022 billeder
kortgodt (2023-10-24 07:26:17+00:00): Hvad er de mange fejl? Brugt billeder fra april 2023.
MxxCon (2023-10-25 02:32:15+00:00): I think some section of Putnam Branch still have rails, at least pattern on the ground seem to have linear features similar to rails
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143048246
CurlingMan13 (2023-10-25 22:56:51+00:00): I think it varies depending on imagery.  some has something that could resemble rails, some imagery does not.  Easy enough to add it back, so I added it back.
Hufkratzer (2023-10-24 19:18:34+00:00): Hi,
nach dem Wiki gehört das leisure=horse_riding Tag nicht an die Reithalle, sondern an das Gesamtgelände "Stall Neuweid", denn zu dem Reitstall gehört nicht nur die Halle, sondern auch das ganze andere Zeug auf dem Gelände (siehe https://neuweid.ch/infrastruktur/). Für Reithallen gibt es das Tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building=riding_hall
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-03 01:31:54+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143554258
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-03 01:33:44+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15326
kortgodt (2023-10-24 06:51:17+00:00): Der går dyr(heste) og græsser på areal du har tagget som landbrugsjord. Du kan tydeligt se det på skråfoto fra i år. er rettet.
Frans S (2023-10-24 09:30:22+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143048605
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-24 06:40:26+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11285392265
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322571547

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Damian G (2023-10-24 07:03:57+00:00): Masz rację, jak to wycofać? Nie widzę takiej możliwości..
NorthCrab (2023-10-24 09:48:08+00:00): Najprościej jest zaznaczyć oba obiekty (trzymając SHIFT), a następnie, klikając prawy przycisk myszki, wybrać opcję złączenia (lub skrót klawiszowy c - od angielskiego "connect"). https://img.monicz.dev/-Nujq6unoZw

Ta operacja sprawi że oba obiekty zostaną połączone w jeden.

Tak, mogłem odrazu sam poprawić przygotowując tą instrukcję, ale ja preferuję nakierowywać nowych użytkowników :-)

Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab (2023-10-24 09:49:07+00:00): PS. no albo po prostu całkowicie usunąć dodany przez ciebie punkt, czyli, zaznaczyć go i wybrać opcję usuń albo kliknąć skrót klawiszowy "Delete" (klawisz na klawiaturze).
zstadler (2023-10-24 07:34:48+00:00): Hello Sivan,

A major revert of the recent vandalism is still on-going.

Please avoid fixing things in parallel as this could further damage the revert efforts.

You can follow the situation on the community channel
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vandalism-and-blocks-in-israel/105176
and in the OSM Israel Telegram channel
https://t.me/OSM_Israel

Thanks,
Zeev
MarcoR (2023-10-26 09:38:06+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM!

Non so cosa sia di preciso un cine-teatro metropolitano, però se aggiungi solo il nome non dice molto.

Prova a vedere sulla wiki se c'è un tag utile da aggiungere: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:amenity#Intrattenimento,_cultura,_belle_arti

Buon mapping,
Marco
Makeena (2026-04-20 19:07:19+00:00): About your fixme on the bus parking next to Pfingstweidpark: there is a wall and a level difference between the two footways but from the closer one, the parking is freely accessible. In fact, it is not a footway but rather a street with general driving ban and the parking is in the middle of the street. I have therefore closed your issue.
MxxCon (2023-10-25 04:39:54+00:00): Hello.
Why did you modify administrative boundary of New York City?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143049029
mavl (2023-10-25 03:35:04+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удалил ключ name. Значения ключей, которые подверглись вандализму, нужно восстанавливать, а не удалять ключи совсем. Так на карте не останется названий. Этот пакет правок отменён.
vojtechzaboril (2024-10-07 18:19:28+00:00): Dobrý den,
asi omylem jste upravil i relaci s dřevěnými kostely (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15002225). Nejspíše jste chtěl údaje přidat ke konkrétnímu kostelu. Situaci opravím.
V
vojtechzaboril (2024-10-07 18:23:56+00:00): Opraveno tady (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157594248), k relaci shrnující jednu UNESCO památku - dřevěné kostely v části Slovenska, jsem dal správná wikidata a názvy.
Kovoschiz (2024-01-05 23:07:14+00:00): Please don't add not yet open features directly. Use `construction:*=`
osmviborg (2023-10-24 07:19:35+00:00): Hej. Veje skal være forbundne. Det nordlige punkt på stien skal forbindes til Stivangen.
zstadler (2023-10-24 07:43:18+00:00): Hello Fizzie41,

A major revert of the recent vandalism is still on-going.

Please avoid fixing things in parallel as this could further damage the revert efforts.

You can follow the situation on the community channel
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vandalism-and-blocks-in-israel/105176
and in the OSM Israel Telegram channel
https://t.me/OSM_Israel

Thanks,
Zeev
SomeoneElse (2023-10-24 08:17:48+00:00): Hi,
Fizzie41's from the DWG as well and we've discussed internally what we can do in parallel 
Regards,
Andy
zstadler (2023-10-24 08:31:11+00:00): Thanks!
zstadler (2023-10-25 09:50:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143091238
user_17222985 (2023-10-24 07:16:30+00:00): also fixed the geometry of the building
Kovoschiz (2024-01-05 23:07:12+00:00): Please don't add not yet open features directly. Use `construction:*=`
arjunaraoc (2024-01-08 14:37:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143051028
VLD549 (2024-04-01 12:24:41+00:00): Hi, I recently understood that in case of voetwegen, we should write the name first, and then the number.

A message from one of your mapping colleagues: 
Putting the name as first gives priority to the name and puts the administrative number (of a system that is old and confusing) on a second place.

Should I change the order now to 
Houtemveldstraat - Voetweg 56?

Thank you.
aceman444 (2023-11-01 22:46:22+00:00): Zdroj?

Ako pozeram, Vy ste boli asi vsade...
zstadler (2023-10-24 08:11:27+00:00): Hello Marc,


A major revert of the recent vandalism is still on-going.

Please avoid fixing things in parallel as this could further damage the revert efforts.

You can follow the situation on the community channel
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vandalism-and-blocks-in-israel/105176
and in the OSM Israel Telegram channel
https://t.me/OSM_Israel

Thanks,
Zeev
Marc_use (2023-10-24 11:25:40+00:00): Okay. Thank you!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 18:56:20+00:00): Hello!

You used
sport=Padelon
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109804720/history

Have you maybe meant
sport=padel
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
MartyG (2024-02-01 21:59:43+00:00): Yes, sorry. You are right. Its Padel. Padelon is the name from the Company. 

https://www.padelon.de/essen
CurlingMan13 (2023-10-24 23:32:45+00:00): Following up on the previous changeset comment I left for you on:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143040769

Please use more detailed changeset comments.
zstadler (2023-10-24 08:44:23+00:00): Hello Mohamed,

In this changeset you have deleted 1336 OSM elements, mostly around the Israeli city of Sderot.

If this was by mistake, please revert them.

If this was intentional, please note note that it only creates additional effort for the OSM Data Working Group and other volunteers who maintain the map for the entire world.

Best regards,
Zeev
Mohamed_Gamal (2023-10-24 09:48:20+00:00): Hi Zeev,

ooh sorry, this is my accident but not intentional

Warm regards,
zstadler (2023-10-24 10:14:18+00:00): I'm very happy to know this is not intentional.

Can I help in reverting the accidental deletions?
Mohamed_Gamal (2023-10-24 10:19:33+00:00): yeah, sure
zstadler (2023-10-25 16:20:31+00:00): Revert of the accidental deletions was done in changeset 143123512.
Mohamed_Gamal (2023-10-26 05:08:06+00:00): I appreciated
emersonveenstra (2023-10-24 12:24:51+00:00): Hi,

There's several nodes with "crossing=2", would you mind double-checking to make sure that's what is intended?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11285670963
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11285670965
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11285671152
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11285671155
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11285671154
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11285670964
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11285671153
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11285670962
tuttiton (2023-10-24 15:42:21+00:00): definitely not. thanks for checking, fixed
tuttiton (2023-10-24 15:43:37+00:00): sorry i mean it was definitely not intended like that
here is a fix changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143071538
osmviborg (2023-10-24 10:20:10+00:00): Den skal laves således: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11285669087 spærringen skal sidde på selve vejen.
eggie (2023-10-24 08:52:14+00:00): Dag Kriskras..
Tip bicycle=no hoef je niet toe te voegen op een wandelpad Dat is default.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143053661

MVG
eggie
Ericsson1 (2023-10-24 08:56:23+00:00): Auf der Homepage der Rehaklinik wird dieses Gebäude als eigene Reithalle beschrieben.
Jrachi (2023-10-24 16:03:16+00:00): Ciao.
Non se se c'è una ciclabile che passa attraverso un parcheggio...
Ma hai spezzato la relazione del 451.
Per favore rimettila a posto.

Grazie
Ivo, Jrachi
Jrachi (2023-10-24 16:05:57+00:00): Scusa, intendevo di inserire il percorso pedonale che hai tracciato.
nevw (2023-10-24 09:27:15+00:00): Hi
on St Bernard's College grounds you have added building=school. This tag is used for the individual school building footprints instead. amenity=school is sufficient for the boundary of school.
nevw (2023-10-24 09:31:35+00:00): At the bottom right of your edit area you will see you have dragged a couple of nodes. I have fixed these. It is a problem that is easily done while using the iD editor that you need to be careful with.
nevw (2023-10-24 09:38:45+00:00): You can see the dragged nodes if you zoom in to the bottom right here https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143054606
Easily done....I have fixed these.
Alafoss (2023-10-25 10:41:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM fmsjd,

I noticed you changed the highway classification from secondary to tertiary for e.g. Epsom Road , Fisher Parade (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9623977/history), Langs Road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9625362/history) and Scotia Street. I wonder what the reasoning behind these changes is?

Thanks for taking the time to clarify this.
user_20500273 (2023-10-25 21:37:48+00:00): Thanks
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-13 02:23:02+00:00): DWG revert:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143953549
eggie (2023-10-24 10:16:27+00:00): Dag Sjouke Let er svo op dat je geen paden vastmaakt aan de landuse=grass
Ik heb het losgemaakt. 
MVG
eggie
Sjouke (2023-10-24 10:31:29+00:00): Akkoord. Ik zal er de volgende keer aan denken.
goaned (2023-11-03 19:40:40+00:00): Res_i_tarits? Nicht Resetarits? Ich war nicht vor Ort, aber halte das für einen offensichtlichen Tippfehler und finde auch zB https://wienerbezirksblatt.at/favoriten-bekommt-seinen-willi-resetarits-hof/

Weißt du mehr als ich?
gnlpfth (2023-11-07 09:25:19+00:00): Nein, das war unabsichtlich. Danke für den Hinweis!
Spiekerooger_Repair (2023-10-24 10:23:49+00:00): Hello Marc, please refrain from trying to fix this vandalism currently as this further complicates the vandalism revert work done by the DWG. See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-about-limit-new-accounts/101656/241
Marc_use (2023-10-24 11:21:08+00:00): What can be done to help with the revert?
Spiekerooger_Repair (2023-10-24 11:30:06+00:00): Currently it is best to wait for DWG to finish their complex reverts.
eggie (2023-10-24 10:20:24+00:00): Dag Sjouke...  Je hoeft geen oneway=no toe te voegen aan reguliere wegen. Overigens routeert het hier niet voor fietsers, want er zit een stukje wandelpad tussen. Wat is de status van De Tille?

MVG
eggie
Sjouke (2023-10-24 10:34:06+00:00): In principe is dit een voetpad. Je kunt uiteraard met de fiets over het bruggetje, maar het is geen fietspad.

Bedoel je dat met status? Anders hoor ik het graag.

Groet,
Sjouke
eggie (2023-10-24 11:28:30+00:00): Ahh  ... 
De hoofdregel is
Een G7 bord dan highway=footway

Een G11, 13, 12a bord dan highway=cycleway (Dat is niet routeerbaar voor fietsers)

Geen bord  .. dan highway=path  met evt surface=....
en foot=yes en bicycle=yes  (of no)

Den dus de bruggetjes dan highway=path en het tussenstuk idem ipv footway.
Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-10-24 11:30:33+00:00): typ..
dat is het niet routeerbaar voor fietsers hoort uiteraard bij highway=footway
eggie (2023-10-24 12:18:06+00:00): Ik heb het even aangepast naar highway=path ipv cycleway en footway. Vraag me wel af of het de bedoeling is dat er bromfietsen mogen rijden. (Tagging voorgaande mapper) 

Veel plezier met mappen, 
eggie
Sjouke (2023-10-24 14:57:07+00:00): Ik geloof niet dat het helemaal de bedoeling is dat er bromfietsers overheen rijden, maar het is wel toegestaan en de ruimte is er ook.
eggie (2023-10-24 15:51:52+00:00): Oke... dan kan die moped=yes en mofa=yes ook op de andere wegdelen. Het stond dacht ik alleen op het bruggetje
eggie (2023-10-24 10:12:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Mathias_ADAV (2025-02-25 13:45:41+00:00): Bonjour, je viens de voir votre contribution concernant cet atelier participatif, vous avez indiqué shop = repair plutôt que shop = bicycle. en effet, les services proposés par le lieu sont indiqués avec les tag service:bicycle:diy = yes / service:bicycle:repair = yes https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dbicycle
user_5359 (2023-10-25 05:54:08+00:00): Hello (again)! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1217982229. What is the meaning of the foreign tags (no OSM key exists)
AREA_HA 	1473.61041282
ID 	LSG-00281.03
NAME 	Landschaft südlich des Estergebirges
NR 	GAP-03b
ROK_PRJ_NR 	1/002084/00/00
SUCHNAME 	LSG-00281.03 [GAP-03b] Landschaft südlich des Estergebirges
Alafoss (2023-10-25 11:05:49+00:00): Thanks for fixing this!
eggie (2023-10-24 19:42:56+00:00): Dag sembeek.. Je vraagt feedback  Lijkt me oke zo.
MVG
eggie
archie (2023-10-24 10:23:36+00:00): Please include islets into bay-relations.
jeslop (2023-10-24 12:27:38+00:00): Reverted on changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143062444
qwertet (2023-10-25 13:53:21+00:00): That discussion cannot be given any weight as it is not possible to discuss on an equal basis for all parties due to restrictions on the forum.
woodpeck (2023-10-25 14:15:35+00:00): Not acceptable. Someone who can edit OSM and write changeset comments can also make their point on community.openstreetmap.org.

I will not tolerate further vandalism of this path. Please understand that creating additional accounts to circumvent a DWG block is a violation of our terms and it undermines your credibility in any further discussion.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-25 14:19:07+00:00): Also "as it is not possible to discuss on an equal basis for all parties due to restrictions on the forum" is lacking any specifics and is unclear and is therefore a poor argument.
ManuelB701 (2023-10-24 15:34:07+00:00): Ich glaube, hierzu sollte ein zweiter Blick geworfen werden, denn in Südrichtung ist der Weg ein gemischter Fuß-/Radweg, in Nordrichtung ist es allerdings ein Fußweg für Fahrrad frei.
Niiepce (2023-10-25 02:04:08+00:00): Hallo Mathilde,
Primär zu Dokumentationszwecken kommentiere ich jetzt nochmal hier unter diesen Änderungssatz.
Wie schon in der Antwort auf die Nachricht, die du mir geschickt hast erläutert, habe ich das Wichtigste an diesem Änderungssatz jetzt erstmal korrigiert. Die Hinweise und Links zum Wiki, die ich dir geschickt habe, erläutern, was noch wichtig ist bevor du weiter Beiträge machst.
Ggf. sind an dem Änderungssatz noch weitere Dinge zu korrigieren, da z.B. die Schutzgebietsgrenze mit anderen Grenzen abschnittsweise übereinstimmt und somit eigentlich nicht als Duplikat hier eingetragen bleiben muss.

Grüße
Niiepce
Elizen (2023-11-16 08:00:48+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, откуда вы брали данные по Давлетово (https://osm.org/node/11285912041)? Мне не удалось найти информацию о том, что в Никифаровском сельсовете или Альшеевском районе есть такой населённый пункт
ottwiz (2023-10-24 10:30:09+00:00): *Somerset County, PA
240gsm (2023-10-26 20:32:02+00:00): .
janolezab (2023-11-28 16:40:21+00:00): Ist der Knoten 11286012292 mit barrier=fence so beabsichtigt? Üblicherweise wird ein Zaun ja als Linie kartiert.
janolezab (2023-11-28 16:42:06+00:00): Und die Nodes 11286012293, 11286012291 etc. sollten wahrscheinlich Bäume sein.
mueschel (2023-11-06 18:14:38+00:00): Hallo,
bitte schau im Wiki mal nach Tags für Aufzüge und Lifts - die Tags 
  cabinlength,cabinwidth,doorwidth gibt es bis jetzt nirgendwo sonst.
Yunkers (2023-11-02 10:01:20+00:00): Hej, dlaczego wycofujesz zmiany bez poinformowania użytkownika, który je wykonał? To nie dość że jest sprzeczne z zasadami osm to ma negatywny wpływ na aktywność innych użytkowników. Jeżeli tego rodzaju wycofywania będą się powtarzać, będę Cię musiał niestety zgłosić do DWG.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-02 10:43:25+00:00): Dodatkowo, na czym tu polega wandalizm?

Patrząc na http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=143060092 to ty psujesz dane i mapujesz fikcyjny podział na jezdnie.

Patrz np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/736354314 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/736354315
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-05 11:01:17+00:00): wysłałem PM do maciek-szn bo coś nie zauważa tego
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-26 17:24:04+00:00): wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144214538
arjunaraoc (2024-01-08 14:37:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my update: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146031519
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143060300