piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
flohoff (2025-07-11 09:23:46+00:00): Aber was verbietet denn das durchfahren? Also das ist doch einfach eine "Private Hauszufahrt" die halt zwischen den Häusern durchgeht? 

Stehen da Schilder das man das nicht darf?
Glocke-Oelde (2025-07-11 09:29:39+00:00): Da steht nur ein von den Anwohner selbst aufgestelltes Schild "Privatweg". Deswegen sperre ich die Durchfahrt auch nicht hier in OSM, sondern habe nur den "Teilungspunkt" gesetzt. In unserer Software kann ich dann den Teil zwischen den Häusern, also zwischen zwei Wegpunkten sperren. Somit respektieren unsere Zusteller den Wunsch des Anwohners und fahren nicht über das Grundstück.
flohoff (2025-07-11 09:51:47+00:00): Aber "Privatweg" ist ja nur die Aussage wer der Straßenunterhaltungspflichtige ist. 

Über "Benutzung" steht da nichts - Das wären ja Schilder wie "Durchfahrt verboten" oder "Betreten verboten" oder "Durchgang verboten" (Was jeweils andere tags bei OSM bedeuten würde)

Privatweg selber würde OSM eigentlich gar nicht erfassen - vielleicht als operator:type=private - Aber nicht als Betretungs einschränkung.

Flo
Glocke-Oelde (2025-07-11 10:21:45+00:00): Aus dem Grund habe ich nur den Wegepunkt gesetzt ohne Tags zu ändern. So kann OSM-basierte Routenführung weiterhin da durch und ich habe damit aber die Möglichkeit in unserer Software die Durchfahrt für unsere Zusteller zu sperren. (es ist halt Wunsch des einen Nachbarn, das der Bote nicht in der Nacht von dem einen Gelände über seins fährt)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-28 09:10:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1329847567/history

why you replace house number with "tree" ?
szalona_entropia (2025-08-07 12:38:25+00:00): Fragment jednojezdniowy (Anny Walentynowicz) zasadniczo nie powinien być jako trunk o ile dopuszcza ruch pojazdów wolnobieżnych.
Wtedy tylko fragment dwujezdniowy mógłby być trunk, ale to zależy od jego długości. Tutaj jest tylko 3 km, dlatego jak przegłosowane zostanie 4 km to nie będzie trunk: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/stosowanie-tagu-highway-trunk-w-polsce/122106/647
fortera_au (2025-08-01 23:46:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
Eye1024 (2025-07-11 15:19:31+00:00): Jesteś pewien że droga polna przy ścieżce rowerowej wzdłuż wału jest zrobiona z kostki brukowej? Powinno być surface=ground i grade3/4.
fortera_au (2025-07-12 00:10:04+00:00): I think there's two others like this that could probably be looked at, it got split up a bit at one point.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168779640
Warin61 (2025-07-12 11:34:46+00:00): This one just stuck out. I tried to contact the original mapper and have not response for serval weeks and so .. deleted. 
If you know of others it would be worthwhile to contact the author and see what they say .. if no response after several weeks go ahead and delete them.
Conquest (2026-06-15 01:06:04+00:00): Hi both,
Just catching up on this. What's the go here? Why was this deleted?
Thanks,
Peter
APneunzehn74 (2025-08-03 18:36:52+00:00): Hallo hier gibt es einen Hinweis zu fehlerhaften Adresse bzw falsch zugeordneten Straßen, Flurweg und Alter Flurweg. Die 13, a,b usw gehören vermutlich zum Flurweg und nicht zum Alten Flurweg. Kannst du das ggf noch einmal überprüfen?
Grüße APneunzehn74
Breit S (2025-08-03 19:13:10+00:00): Hallo APneunzehn74,
vielen Dank für deinen Hinweis. Ich habe die Adressen nochmal mittels Google maps bzw Bayernatlas abgeglichen. Du hast Recht, diese Gebäude sind dem Flurweg zugeordnet und nicht irrtümlich dem Alter Flurweg. Eine etwas doofe Ecke in Plattling. Ich habe es ausgebessert. Falls dir nochwas auffällt, melde dich bitte :).
Schönen Abend noch.
VG.
Samuel
APneunzehn74 (2025-08-03 20:13:09+00:00): Die Nummer 15 und 15a passen dann vermutlich ebenfalls nicht.
Und bitte Vorsicht, der Bayernatlas und natürlich auch die Daten vom großen G sind keine zulässigen Quellen für OSM.
Grüße Andreas
Discostu36 (2025-07-11 11:00:30+00:00): Ist da kein Tür? Falls doch, hast du da mehr gelöscht, als du wolltest. B
ThoughtsMatter (2025-07-11 11:43:54+00:00): Danke für den aufmerksamen Blick. Da lagen zwei überlagernde Knoten, einer als Eingang/Tür mit ausdefinierten Eigenschaften und einer, der in meinem Verständnis keine weiteren Eigenschaften hatte, daher dachte ich, dass der ein Überbleibsel gewesen wäre. Die Tür ist da und somit korrekt, danke.
Discostu36 (2025-07-11 11:58:41+00:00): Da ist ja jetzt immer noch eine Tür in Daten. War die doppelt? Jetzt bin ich irritiert 😂
ThoughtsMatter (2025-07-11 12:01:05+00:00): Den Eindruck hatte ich, bin aber absolut kein OSM-Profi. Wenn da jetzt noch nur eine (:-D) Tür drin ist, hätte aber aus meiner Sicht alles seine Richtigkeit.
monhiko (2025-07-11 09:09:31+00:00): 明天也要加油哦！
zstadler (2026-06-21 18:14:12+00:00): This changeset seems to have many duplicates related to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168753151 of the same user.

Duplicates were hopefully removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184401000
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-11 23:30:00+00:00): DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012
NieWnen (2025-07-27 16:09:01+00:00): Proszę nie łącz ścieżek z granicami/nie nakładaj ich na siebie.

Poprawione.
geow (2025-07-11 12:59:12+00:00): Hi, wurde die Antenne komplett entfernt oder ist die nur außer Betrieb?
Norbert Dichter (2025-07-14 14:23:23+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key. Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168781694
user_5359 (2025-07-11 13:47:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please help me, what exactly was so incorrect that you had to delete the building instead of correcting it?
dadavid (2025-07-11 10:28:21+00:00): Hi, please do not upload test data to openstreetmap.org. I have reverted your edits. 

You may in some cases use https://apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ for testing, if you are developing a new editor for example. 

Cheers
David

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168788448
Leo Slager (2025-07-12 11:11:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Metrophil (2025-09-02 11:29:54+00:00): Hallo Athomü, was ist der Grund für deine Änderung? Die Strecke Käfertal-Heddesheim ist eine Eisenbahn-, keine Straßenbahnstrecke
Vespilot (2026-03-12 20:10:01+00:00): Vollkommen Richtig diese Bahnstrecke ist eine meterspurige Strecke nach EBO eingegliedert in das Staßenbahnnetz der Stadt Mannheim.
Auf diesem Streckenabschnitt dürfen nur Fahrzeuge und Betriebspersonal fahren, die die entsprechende Ausrüstung und Ausbildung haben.
andi9876 (2025-07-29 15:10:45+00:00): Hi,
you added hundreds of beverage shops. Please explain about your data source. Otherwise it could delete.
Thanks.
Frans S (2025-07-13 10:35:15+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark. 
It is not necessary to map every single piece of farmland. Just map the circumstance and the canals (not the individual ditches)
See also the comments in the comment section of the project.
I will correct these.
Best regards
B252697 (2025-09-18 13:45:49+00:00): I think some of these roads should be parking aisles for underground car parking spaces! Would be great if service=parking_aisle is added for the roads which are parking aisles :)
B252697 (2025-09-18 13:49:49+00:00): To better reflect the function and reality of these parking aisles, and also to adjust the emphasis of these roads. At low zooms, I find that this condo can largely be obscured by these roads, which I think is not what is desired also.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2025-07-12 00:12:28+00:00): Mấy cái biển báo ở các nút giao phức tạp này cần xem thêm hình nữa nhé. Đừng chỉ vì ahorn.lima-city.de/tr nó báo lỗi thì xóa luôn restriction.
có 2 options streetview ở Việt Nam ngoài Mapillary mà có độ phủ rộng tốt rồi. 
1. Google StreetView
2. StreetView.vn
tuan_gsm (2025-07-12 10:42:46+00:00): chỗ này outdate rồi mà
phoenixsaigon1698 (2025-07-12 10:49:46+00:00): Hoặc là anh chắc chắn có hính ko còn biển cấm nữa thì xoá luôn. Còn nếu nó chỉ báo lỗi là thiếu thành phần thì không nên xoá, nên xem hình và sửa lại các member bị thiếu. Bây giờ anh xoá rất nhiều cái rồi, phải đi check lại hết. Và trong changeset description, xoá thì ghi xoá chứ đừng ghi fix. Để tiện trace lại.
Leo Slager (2025-07-13 10:19:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2025-07-13 10:21:54+00:00): Dag Carlitoon,

Alle begin is moeilijk.
In NL taggen we de bedrijfsgegevens op de address-node en niet op het gebouw.
Ik zie dat 2 andere mappers de data al hebben overgebracht naar die address-node, dus je hoeft niets meer aan te passen.
literan (2025-07-12 11:09:56+00:00): и нафига это? вы, простите, наугад теги ставите?
OSMchik (2025-07-12 13:16:17+00:00): По ошибке, скорее всего. Спасибо за правку!
Leo Slager (2025-07-13 10:24:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2025-07-11 09:06:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 05:41:26+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/168906429
fortera_au (2025-08-01 23:47:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
woodpeck (2025-07-11 12:00:54+00:00): DWG has photo of "Privat – Ingen adgang" sign where track branches off Århusvej.
NeisBot (2025-07-11 09:09:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 05:39:47+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/168806079
aboc (2025-07-13 09:08:38+00:00): Hai accidentalmente creato un confine internazionale in una sottodivisione della Svizzera. Attenzione con i confini amministrativi nelle relazioni
alsper78 (2025-07-13 13:43:35+00:00): Chiedo scusa e ti ringrazio, vedo che hai già corretto. Mi sono confuso con il confine Italia-Svizzera
SimonPoole (2025-07-17 03:36:01+00:00): The mistake started a couple of years back when somebody changed it to a administrative boundary. I've fixed that too now by changing it to boundary=statistical which is what we have done for similar regions in the country.
fortera_au (2025-08-01 23:47:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
Tomas Straupis (2025-07-12 07:30:25+00:00): Kas čia per pakeitimas?
Tomas Straupis (2025-07-12 07:37:02+00:00): Prieš tris savaites pro ten išvažinėjau, ten absoliučiai nieko nebuvo, ir dabar jau padarytas naujas pravažiavimas per mišką?
Robot8A (2025-07-11 11:35:33+00:00): Comentario del conjunto de cambios:
Añadir nombres multilíngües name:es y name:ca
Robot8A (2025-07-11 11:35:31+00:00): Comentario del conjunto de cambios:
Añadir nombres multilíngües name:es y name:ca
phoenixsaigon1698 (2025-07-12 00:14:25+00:00): Cái này bên Grab họ tạo mà, có gì báo họ chứ anh?
tuan_gsm (2025-07-12 10:41:57+00:00): fix luôn cho nhanh bên đó không có check comment
Bem Mapas (2025-08-04 11:47:51+00:00): Esse trecho tem radar e sinalização de 60 km/h. De onde você tirou esse limite de 110 km/h? Você está praticando vandalismo severo nos limites de velocidade das vias.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-12 00:22:11+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/389889978

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
literan (2025-07-12 11:06:01+00:00): не надо писать капсом
literan (2025-07-12 11:06:25+00:00): спам про "возбуждает" тоже вычищен
NeisBot (2025-07-11 10:26:57+00:00): Hi taewookeum, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Modified lane count on a way from 61 to 8 lanes."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
fortera_au (2025-08-01 23:47:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
Ruslan Fatih (2025-07-11 13:34:18+00:00): Этот чел как всегда вымышленные названия какие то пишет.
Hidden Mountain (2025-07-11 13:40:38+00:00): Ага, самый бесящий неадекват среди местных мапперов
habi (2025-07-17 10:26:05+00:00): Ciao Spaeni
Der Wegteil über die Wiese Richtung Südwesten ist deutlich auf den swisstopo Luftbildern zu erkennen.
Gibt es denn den Weg so nicht mehr in der Realität?
Gruss aus Bern,
habi
Spaeni (2025-07-17 10:37:47+00:00): Hallo Habi,

nein das gibt es so nicht mehr.
Wurde alles Überbauen. Bis ende Jahr sind alle Häuser fertig.

Dacht ich könne da ein Bauplan als Hintergrund nehmen und die Häuser mal einzeichnen. Geht wohl nicht so einfach.

Hier siehts du wie es sein wird.
https://grossfeld-seewen.ch/wp/situation/

Der Weg gibt es definitiv nicht mehr.
habi (2025-07-17 21:26:05+00:00): Prima, mersi für die Bestätigung.

Wegen Bauplan: In OpenStreetMap dürfen keine anderen Karten als Grundlage zum Editieren benutzt werden (Ausnahme sind historische Karten, deren Copyright abgelaufen ist oder bei *expliziter* Einwilligung des Erstellers dieser Karten). Daher ist ein Einzeichnen vom Bauplan her nicht möglich.
Daher werden wir wohl auf neue Luftfotos von swisstopo warten müssen, um die Häuser präzise einzeichnen zu können.
World_Winner (2025-07-11 10:59:07+00:00): I have made the change as an exception since there is geometric separation of road axes, and navigational guides would fail to notify the lane change in time.
nevw (2025-07-17 23:39:42+00:00): Hi, I noticed some of the waterways flowing uphill but those ways should point in the direction of water flow.
That is, the waterway is mapped with the direction of the line from upstream to downstream.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Waterways
user_22130434 (2025-07-21 11:33:09+00:00): its flat
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168789846
nevw (2025-07-21 14:31:35+00:00): All tributaries flow to the main stream and then on to the mouth.
user_22130434 (2025-09-28 06:34:01+00:00): im only young
user_22130434 (2025-09-28 06:34:22+00:00): dont report me please im only young
NeisBot (2025-07-11 11:09:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 05:38:41+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/169089875
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-12 00:22:04+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8294742696
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/798141042

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2025-07-12 10:01:38+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/6753887325. Did you mean ref:tiploc  instead of ref:tiplociploc ? Side question why was ref:GB:tiploc not used?

See also http://www.osm.org/node/6724844051. Did you mean ref:tiploc  instead of ref:tiplocploc ?
Poggs (2025-07-12 10:12:49+00:00): Apologies, my bad - they should have been 'ref:tiploc' (copy and paste error).  ref:tiploc has been used as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UKRail_Project.  There are no tags named 'ref:GB:tiploc' or 'ref:gb:tiploc' in the current United Kingdom extract.

Subsequent change coming up to fix the mislabelled nodes.
user_5359 (2025-07-12 10:46:16+00:00): If a reference value is only used in one country, it has become common practice to use this country according to the ref key. This enables a quicker understanding and control and a country-dependent interpretation.
Poggs (2025-07-12 10:49:20+00:00): Is it a good idea, therefore, to update all the existing ref:tiploc, ref:crs and ref:stanox entries to have the prefix ref:gb?
user_5359 (2025-07-12 10:58:03+00:00): Please ref:GB (because country codes are in upper letters, language codes are in lower letters ) :)
user_5359 (2025-07-12 09:21:19+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1414060021. What is the mean of the tag descrpt = no ?
voschix (2025-07-12 10:09:24+00:00): Thanks. Already corrected. Spotted it myself.
NotAvailable (2025-07-12 07:47:46+00:00): اسم یک شهرک روی یک کوچه! مطمئنی؟
bxl-forever (2025-07-11 12:35:32+00:00): Thanks for the information.
I had planned to relocate the venue in September but let’s do it now, then.

Just one thing, please never add fake addresses to places, that just corrupts the addressing system.  If the point is located in Anderlecht, it should never get an address as if it was elsewhere in the city.  The correct way to map is to move the point to its new location (without typing any address).

Don’t worry, everything has been fixed here.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-29 03:27:00+00:00): Reverted SEO spam addition of malformed name=* tag to building

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183331516
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-29 03:27:54+00:00): Also duplicate of existing POI https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13011387263
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-29 04:24:07+00:00): (Which already had the same tags, just actually properly tagged)
FMC-Henri (2025-07-11 12:11:55+00:00): Auf Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156346067 scheint ein Schreibfehler zu sein.
Andere Tags, wie bspw. tactile_paving brauchst du nicht zu erfassen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168792501
NeisBot (2025-07-11 12:15:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 05:38:19+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/169089860
hoserab (2025-07-11 17:21:18+00:00): Hi Sanjana,

FYI I have deleted this turn restriction because it's not necessary. The 'to' element in the relation you added is already a one-way road that only allows traffic from the 'from' element to turn right. I have no doubt there's a right-turn-only sign here "on the ground", but you don't need to map the turn restriction when the one-way on the intersecting road already precludes traffic from being routed left.

Just wanted to let you know. Thanks for your contributions. :)
sanjanasharma_lyft (2025-08-06 05:24:17+00:00): Hi, Hoserab! 
My name is Sanjana and I’m mapper in the OSM team at Lyft.
Thank you for addressing this turn restriction and removing it. The one-way tag indeed permits only a single maneuver when exiting the area. I apologize for the excessive mapping and appreciate your detailed explanation :)

Happy mapping, Sanjana
Mathias_ADAV (2025-10-08 10:36:47+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre contribution ! Les voies n'étaient pas connecté entre elle donc la voie verte ne pouvait pas ressortir dans un calculateur d’itinéraire, c'est réparé. 
Pas la  peine d'indiquer le nom voie verte, j'ai ajouté le type de panneau. Avez vous des photos ? Si oui, vous pouvez les mettre sur panoramax : https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/ 

Bon mapping ! Mathias
marczoutendijk_repair (2025-08-12 13:49:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 170343370 where the changeset comment is: ¨DWG
La Bióloga Lu (2025-10-04 19:11:10+00:00): Buenas tardes Sr. Pedro. Revisando el mapeo de este sector, me encuentro con esta poligonal, pero no corresponde con los linderos en Catastro para el sector Santa Ana-El Cefetal. ¿Tiene algún objetivo en específico? Porque va a tener correcciones.
pantufla (2026-05-29 03:04:09+00:00): Coincido que estos límites son muy imprecisos
MassCartog (2025-07-11 16:37:21+00:00): Hello, next time instead of deleting data from OSM, just correct the way type. If this is a driveway, change it to a driveway type, and tag it private.
Comino (2025-07-15 07:27:19+00:00): Hi ssnep,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#legacy-tags
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin
ssnep (2025-07-18 10:34:34+00:00): Thank you Edwin!
I've edit this location as your indications.
Ernie C (2025-07-11 13:24:14+00:00): I deleted a Shell station I shouldn't have. I fixed it in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168796625
elsy1 (2025-07-13 07:07:56+00:00): درود، لطفا در ویرایش دقت بفرمایید! باتشکر