piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
josmougn (2025-03-16 11:26:48+00:00): Si c'est une erreur de "construction" de la relation, pourquoi ne pas simplement la corriger ?
D'après cette photo il y a bien interdiction de tourner à gauche : https://www.bing.com/maps?&cp=45.817848~3.153799&lvl=18.969845&dir=86.70537&pi=-5.7077446&style=x&mo=z.0&ftst=0&ftics=False&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027
mat (2025-03-16 15:06:52+00:00): Je n'avais pas vu la ligne continue sur le boulevard mitterrand, j'ai re-crée une relation correcte depuis.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-17 08:18:42+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12668911341/history has shop = hydraulics that was added in this edit
shop=hydraulics ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
os-emmer (2026-03-19 19:13:03+00:00): Hansa-Flex is a chain of shops, that are specialised in selling hydraulic components. They Sell hoses, fittings and other related stuff. They also have some pneumatic (air pressure) components. But the focus is hydraulics. The products bought here are often used for repairing tractors, construction equipment or industrial mashines.

If you know a better fitting tagging sheme feel free to update the tagging. It would be nice to have a good tagging sheme as there are a few hundret of these shops:
https://www.hansa-flex.de/en/branch-finder
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-27 03:33:10+00:00): shop=hydraulic_supplies to distinguish them from places offering services?
dgitto (2025-03-20 09:59:21+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM,
non mettere un nodo address sulla via.
Va messo come nodo separato, posizionato proprio sull'ingesso
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses#Regole_specifiche_per_l'Italia
NeisReview (2025-03-17 07:23:08+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges #Test

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. 

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
NeisRevert (2025-03-21 20:46:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163923945 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove testdata
archie (2025-03-15 20:50:50+00:00): Hej, jag har reverterat denna cs. stigen går under en bro. finns ingen anledning att häfta ihop bron (layer=1) med stigen under bron.
NeisRevert (2025-03-22 06:27:32+00:00): #vandalism

Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163925733
VLD549 (2025-04-28 16:21:41+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. Without questioning anyone's mapping skills, I find the name and address to be different.
Cockaert Home of Design
Ossegemstraat 12 & 29

The name I can change, the address I don't know how. Can you help?

Thank you!
George Sears (2025-03-16 18:47:16+00:00): Buonasera, non capisco perché aggiungere una way sovrapposta al perimetro del castello con tag di mura della città...?
George Sears (2025-03-22 20:32:55+00:00): Hi, I'm deleting the city_walls ways you wrongly added, the wiki is clear on this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dcity_wall

it is NOT for mapping the walls of a castle, there is no point in mapping walls of a castle, the walls of the castle are already defined by the outline of the castle polygon. What  you are doing is mapping for the renderer
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
Gregory Peony (2025-03-26 18:07:36+00:00): Please modify footprints if you can tell which building they represent as you did in the north and south of this changeset rather than deleting and redrawing the from scratch like you did in the middle. Disconnect shared nodes with (d) in ID.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163667599
osmviborg (2025-03-16 06:55:34+00:00): route relationen er stadig på Skovbyvej, bevidst?
AsgerFrank (2025-03-17 14:33:02+00:00): Ja, det er fordi jeg ikke har synderlig lyst at røre (med en ildtang) det jeg opfatter som illegitime route relationer, såsom 
 "Langs Kysten" - der ikke har  noget fysisk grundlag, skiltning eller dokumentation; det er åbenbart blot et privat turforslag.

Jeg har mødt flere andre af den slags øjensynligt uberettigede på danmarkskortet og helst slettede jeg dem blot, men jeg afventer en mere samlet indsats over for ruter der ligger udenfor OSM's virkeområde. Altså en konsensus i communityet der kan bekræfte mig, ud over hvad jeg kan læse af wiki'en.
osmviborg (2025-03-17 14:43:34+00:00): 👍
DaveF (2025-03-16 11:01:00+00:00): Hi Could you change your edits to Capitalised Case.
Sparkymark (2025-03-16 11:38:55+00:00): Done, I did a copy and paste from their website and omitted to change it.
DaveF (2025-03-16 13:04:38+00:00): Thanks
CurlingMan13 (2025-03-16 00:10:14+00:00): Please read my previous comments on your changesets.
CurlingMan13 (2025-03-16 00:11:14+00:00): Please stop making changes until you understand what tags to use.

Again, please use the correct tags of:"

man_made=geoglyph
area=yes
inscription=A
CurlingMan13 (2025-03-16 00:12:02+00:00): Please use the correct tags.

C/S reverted or fixed.
CurlingMan13 (2025-03-16 00:12:57+00:00): correct tags are actually:

man_made=geoglyph
area=yes
inscription=G
Yog Sot (2025-03-16 01:00:13+00:00): to nie są klify, tam mozna sobie z buta chodzić w dowolnym kierunku bez sprzętu wspinaczkowego ;]
TrickyFoxy (2025-03-15 22:30:33+00:00): 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap
CurlingMan13 (2025-03-16 00:14:12+00:00): you could at least capitalize the "B", even if you aren't going to tag it correctly.

Object should have these tags
man_made=geoglyph
area=yes
inscription=B
CurlingMan13 (2025-03-16 00:09:06+00:00): You should be using man_made=geoglyph

Again, I fixed this for you.
molensteen (2025-03-15 21:31:13+00:00): ik denk dat ik het water ook moet aanpassen en de schooltuin ook
eggie (2025-03-16 06:43:28+00:00): Hoi..

Dat moet eigenlijk met een multipolygoon. Het is een eilandje.

Het water wordt dan de outer en het eilandje de inner.

Wat voorbeelden:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Multipolygon_Examples

Probeer je het zelf?

Mapse
eggie
molensteen (2025-03-17 22:14:55+00:00): Hoi eggie, wederom hartelijk dank, ik ga het morgen proberen! -molensteen
StC (2025-03-17 09:21:52+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
ilias_ (2025-03-15 23:37:14+00:00): Hi Maroc_WC2030,

I reverted your changeset because you changed Avenue 2 Mars from a single line to double lines. You cannot do that because it's only separated by paint. When the road is divided by an actual physical obstacle, then you can do that.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway for more info.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163671031
UrSuS (2025-04-30 13:23:16+00:00): Kāpēc jūs noņēmāt manu pareizo rediģēšanu un pievienojāt vecos objhects, kas neeksistē?
citrula (2025-03-16 19:10:30+00:00): Matthew, could you explain what you are trying to accomplish in these edits?
janesk (2025-03-17 12:55:28+00:00): G'day,

Please make your changesets comments more descriptive. "Added new data" tells people nothing about what your changeset does. A better comment might have been something like "added footpaths and fences" (although I can see you also did more than that).

Cheers
user_21880486 (2025-03-17 19:38:37+00:00): Fair point—I’ll be more specific with my changeset comments going forward

Cheers
Sandal man (2025-03-16 07:57:48+00:00): Hello,
Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)
But please make smalle change sets, this helps others in tracking changes. 
Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thank you.
flohoff (2025-03-16 11:54:14+00:00): Moin,
ich habe hier den changeset gesehen und nach Beschreibung hast du hier Gebäude mit den Bing Luftbildern korrigiert. Das ist eine ziemlich schlechte Idee. 

In NRW haben wir zugriff auf das ALKIS - Das Liegenschaftskataster - das hat auf wenige centimeter genau eingemessene Gebäude. Viele Gebäude sind auch aus dem ALKIS übernommen. Wenn du das jetzt mit Bing korrigierst besteht immer die Gefahr da mehr "kaputt" zu machen. Bing ist dafür bekannt große Lagefehler zu haben. Dazu kommen auch noch Parallaxenfehler aus der Luftbildperspektive.

Hier mal ein Screenshot von einem deiner Korrigierten Gebäuden. Die Graue Fläche ist das aus dem ALKIS und so war das Gebäude vorher.

https://tmp.zz.de/20250316-OverbidStature/Screenshot_from_2025-03-16_12-50-46.png

Du kannst dir das ALKIS auch im ID Editor einblenden - die die viel mit Gebäuden machen nutzen allerdings häufig den JOSM editor.

Es gibt auch wege Gebäude mehr oder weniger Automatisch aus dem ALKIS zu übernehmen als vektoren.

Flo
Toedtmanns (2025-03-16 12:06:06+00:00): Hallo Flo,
Alles klar, ich verstehe. Da war ich dann wohl etwas zu naiv herangegangen, das tut mir leid.

Was wäre jetzt der beste Weg meine Änderungen wieder rückgängig zu machen?

Danke für die Rückmeldung.
Erik
flohoff (2025-03-16 13:48:19+00:00): Reverten würde ich deine changesets nicht. Ich wollte nur verhindern das du großflächig jetzt Gebäude nach Bing korrigierst. Ich kann man das gleich mal ansehen und die paar Gebäude aus dem ALKIS updaten

Also keine Sorge - Wollte wie gesagt nur verhindern das du da jetzt wochen an Arbeit rein steckst :)

Probier mal ob du im ID als Hintergrund das ALKIS hin bekommst. Das geht irgendwie.

Flo
Adam Franco-Import (2025-03-15 22:16:36+00:00): Change set comment should have been "Add Shoreham addresses..."
gabro00 (2025-03-18 15:38:40+00:00): Hello, what is the source of these plans?
Milaviy4 (2025-03-19 09:27:35+00:00): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highways_in_Hungary#/media/File:HU_Motorways_Plan2016_22.png
tordans (2025-03-16 07:11:04+00:00): Hallo! Für way 820266912 hat sich die Anzahl ca halbiert. Ist da umgebaut worden oder wo liegt der Fehler?…
VG
i_ngli (2025-03-24 11:48:59+00:00): Hallo, ich habe mit https://streetcomplete.app/ versucht, Fragen zu beantworten. Tut mir leid, wenn das zu Fehlern führte.

Ich war vor Ort und habe da wo die Frage örtlich markiert war, die Fragen beantwortet; allerdings waren nicht für jeden Fahrradständer solche Fragen notiert.

Vielleicht ein StreetComplete Problem?
jhuang97 (2025-03-16 00:23:31+00:00): thanks!
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-15 22:51:01+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10718789426
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12308386064
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535833033
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/534823001

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
acubens71 (2025-03-15 23:00:48+00:00): + source=BDTopo pour les noms de voies
StC (2025-03-17 09:23:40+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
Bernard 88 95 (2025-03-17 14:23:39+00:00): Bonjour Merci pour votre commentaire , effectivement désolé j'ai du oublier de rétablir la continuité lors d'une modification. Mais justement une question, j'ai reçu un autre commentaire ce weekend de cartographe qui me disait que la FFRP n'autorisait pas que l'on cartographie ces itinéraires de randonnée qu'en savez vous? Car justement dans ce secteur des modifications sont en cours sur le terrain
StC (2025-03-17 14:41:46+00:00): Bonjour,

c'est un vaste sujet. Disons, en première approximation, qu'avoir trop d'itinéraires avec des problèmes de continuité dans OSM rend inopérants tous les systèmes de contrôle de qualité que nous mettons en place. Du coup, tant que les itinéraires que la FFRP souhaite voir supprimés (lesquels ??) sont encore là, nous les nettoyons au même titre que les autres, pour éviter la pollution des outils.

Pour le reste, il y a pas mal de sujets du forum sur cette question. Il y a aussi les canaux Telegram (en particulier OSM Plein Air) où on croise des professionnels du secteur, et le moins qu'on puisse dire est que la situation est complexe... Les propositions de retrait pur et simple ne font pas consensus, ne serait-ce que parce que les chemins sont recréés (souvent par des contributeurs étrangers) dès qu'ils sont détruits.
Bernard 88 95 (2025-03-17 15:37:57+00:00): Merci pour votre retour, oui du peut que j'ai pu lire sur le forum OSM ce weekend le problème commence à daté (2014) et certaine information commence à être je pense obsolète. J'ai également consulté le site FFRP pour voir ce qu'ils proposaient mais il me semble très brouillon et pas être du tout a jour. Le projet OSM Plein Air me semble intéressent , dés que j'ai un instant pour la lecture je m'y plonge. Bien a vous
StC (2025-03-17 17:28:48+00:00): Hélas le wiki du projet Plein Air est le parent pauvre du projet : les contributeurs préfèrent cartographier et sortir en plein air plutôt qu'écrire de la documentation...
flohoff (2025-03-16 11:42:07+00:00): Hi,
willkommen bei OSM - Schön das du mit machst.

Mir ist der changeset hier aufgefallen weil "cool" als Changeset kommentar doch eher ein bisschen wenig ist.

Es gibt jede menge Mapper die Changesets sich ansehen und versuchen anhand des Changeset kommentars versuchen rauszufinden was und warum du geändert hast.

Es wäre also cool wenn du dir da mehr mühe geben könntest zu beschreiben was und warum du das geändert hast. Vor allem bei dingen die nicht so offensichtlich sind.

Keep on mapping

Flo
flohoff (2025-03-16 11:47:19+00:00): 
Was mir noch aufgefallen ist - Bei der Brücke der Straße Sonnebrink hast du einen Namen gesetzt.

name= ist bei OSM nur für wirkliche Eigennamen. Also "Konrad-Adenauer-Haus" oder "Villa Hammerschmidt" - Das ist nicht für "Beschreibendes" also sowas wie "Sporthalle" - Sowas gehört in das "description=" tag

Flo
limes11 (2025-10-01 16:21:43+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12669119131

entfernt, da ein Kunstwerk mit Namen der Künstlerin keinen Sinn ergibt. Falls hier lediglich der Wohnsitz der Künstlerin ist, wird dies nicht erfasst. Falls hier etwas erfassungswürdiges ist, dann gerne beschreiben, dann lässt sich sicher ein Weg finden.

Grüße
tastrax (2025-03-22 09:56:42+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
iandees (2025-03-16 02:02:05+00:00): What is an "OEG Import"?
GeeMaps! (2025-03-16 02:40:44+00:00): Organised Editing Group doing an Import
iandees (2025-03-16 03:02:15+00:00): Gotcha.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-16 04:48:17+00:00): I'll modify the comment a bit for the rest of them still to do! :-)
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:57:22+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401566
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:55:38+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401536
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:55:32+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401534
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:55:30+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401533
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:55:24+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401532
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:55:19+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401529
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:55:13+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401526
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:55:07+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401522
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:53:29+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401487
maplemoths (2025-03-20 02:05:02+00:00): Comment is incorrect, i added enterances in Pacific Grove.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:53:23+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401475
Frans S (2025-03-17 13:21:32+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please solve the issues shown by the issue triangle before you upload your mappings.
Please improve your knowledge about how to tag highways.
You tagged small local paths in-between farmland as highway=unclassified.  Path is a better option.
Check this wiki page
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
More detailed (Tagging here is similar as in Tanzania
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SxLkCU3IRecsFV2kYx61VImJLLtQiKw3/view?pli=1
Best regards
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:53:17+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401473
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:53:12+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401468
Chitosecre8 (2025-03-16 02:00:44+00:00): wait i should've turned the other eight buildings into houses instead DANG IT
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:53:06+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401467
whammo (2025-03-17 00:49:50+00:00): Hi H-Q, welcome to OSM. Is there a reason you duplicated this building and gave it the name you did? All edits uploaded to OSM are visible to all users, whether or not you're "practicing".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163673451
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 00:01:21+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165049590
5m4u9 (2025-03-16 14:21:46+00:00): Hola, bienvenid@!

Gracias por añadir los contornos de los edificios de la zona, solo hay pequeño problema.

El nombre de las viviendas no debe contener info privada (propia), solo nombres como "edificio las torres" y así, solo los que tienen escrito en su frente ese nombre.
b-jazz (2025-05-05 16:00:39+00:00): I've reverted this change as it messed up a bunch of lines around the church property. My guess is that multiple things were selected while you moved a point thinking that you were only moving a single object. Feel free to attempt fixing up the parking lot, but make sure you review your change fully before uploading. Thanks.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:53:01+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401464
citrula (2025-03-16 19:18:32+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163703090
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-17 01:15:06+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17405
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:52:55+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401463
shu0410 (2025-03-16 19:11:23+00:00): 哥，不会画咱可以不画哈，不要给我一坨屎让我改哈，谢谢啦
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:52:52+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401462
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:52:46+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401456
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:52:39+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401453
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:52:37+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401452
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:52:31+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401451
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:52:26+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401449
Frans S (2025-03-17 13:48:23+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please solve the issues shown by the issues triangle before your upload your mappings. 
Improve your knowledge about how to tag highways,
You tag small paths as a connecting highway
Check these webpages
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
This is about Tanzania but also valid here
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SxLkCU3IRecsFV2kYx61VImJLLtQiKw3/view?pli=1
Best regards
Frans S (2025-03-17 13:50:55+00:00): Hello again
You did not tag the crossings highway/waterway, Mostly a ford.
Be sure you connected both waterway and highway when adding a crossing tag.
Best regards
Dimacn (2025-03-16 07:07:35+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста не вносите адреса на пешеходные переходы. Адреса - это свойства здания или территории.
Space_Mage (2025-03-16 08:10:28+00:00): Случайно получилось. Спасибо, что заметили
Frans S (2025-03-23 15:52:28+00:00): Hello. Thanks for the mapping here.

You have drawn in a road with a bridge in an empty area.

You are unlikely to encounter bridges here. Especially if something is not a main road.  This road ends in cropland. Track or when narrower than 3 mtr Path is a better tag.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-03-23 15:56:37+00:00): Hello again. 
When you map waterways, take this in consideration.
When you can jump over it, tag it as a stream. otherwise , wider, as a river.
Best regards
tastrax (2025-03-22 10:07:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.  FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
kuhni74 (2025-12-20 19:12:24+00:00): what kind of localty should that be? Mutthorn is a peak (already mapped), the new alpine_hut is also mapped nearby
Wikilux (2025-12-21 15:40:29+00:00): Mutthorn is not only a peak, but also a place. You can't find the address Mutthorn 1 Kandersteg (the new alpine hut) if the place is not mapped. The peak with its name does not help in this case.
See swisstopo:
https://map.geo.admin.ch/#/map?lang=de&center=2629033.16,1148487.2&z=10&topic=ech&layers=ch.bfs.gebaeude_wohnungs_register;ch.swisstopo.amtliches-strassenverzeichnis&bgLayer=ch.swisstopo.pixelkarte-farbe&featureInfo=tooltip&catalogNodes=ech,457,491

A similar case is on Titlis, Engelberg:
There is a place with the official name Kleintitlis and an address Kleintitlis 1.7 6390 Engelberg. This address can not be found on osm, since someone deleted the place Kleintitlis:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Kleintitlis+1.7+Engelberg&zoom=16&minlon=9.147126674652101&minlat=47.493254711205346&maxlon=9.187231063842775&maxlat=47.50544649677425#map=16/47.49935/9.17093

on swisstopo:
https://map.geo.admin.ch/#/map?lang=de&center=2675351.41,1180424.43&z=11&topic=ech&layers=ch.bfs.gebaeude_wohnungs_register@features=191834307_0;ch.swisstopo.amtliches-strassenverzeichnis@features=10141328&bgLayer=ch.swisstopo.pixelkarte-farbe&featureInfo=tooltip&catalogNodes=ech,457,491
kuhni74 (2025-12-21 17:55:18+00:00): A "locality" is usually not an address, but a named landscape feature that cannot be tagged as something else (peak, saddle, ridge, valley, cliff,...). If I understand correctly, an address can be on an own node (without a place tag) or on a building. Yes, the place "Kleintitlis" also confused me recently, it's possible that I deleted the place or at least left a note there and somebody else deleted it. But the building on Klein Titlis bears the desired address, which should probably be improved though: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273170047