piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aceman444 (2026-05-04 00:54:00+00:00): Ano, Presov vyzera byt rozbity (tiez ste k tomu prispeli: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2320148/history/16 ).
na admin_level=10 maju byt katastralne uzemia (4 ks). Tu su vsak na level 10 aj akesi casti mesta (este viac ako oficialnych 7)
Ale dame to do poriadku, vydrzte par dni.
Xvtn (2024-11-07 20:20:03+00:00): Hi, did you see my comment on your other changeset? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158468386
Glassman (2024-11-07 17:15:56+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Looks like you accidentally dragged a node. It has been fixed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158835594
Glassman (2024-11-07 17:41:18+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158835868
Glassman (2024-11-08 02:46:14+00:00): It is a good ideal to leave the address since it will likely be reused.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158836003
Glassman (2024-11-07 17:42:07+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158836025
Glassman (2024-11-07 17:42:27+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158836094
SHB2000 (2024-12-13 23:30:07+00:00): Hi, this section was categorized as a motorway as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Roads, even if it's a very short section.
JoaoPaixao (2024-11-07 11:09:01+00:00): Com base em que informações é que concluíste que estas 2 áreas https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1331504601 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1331504651 são landuse=meadow?
topolusitania (2024-11-07 19:15:06+00:00): Olá
Muito obrigado por andares a verificar as minhas edições. Fico feliz por só duas zonas te terem suscitado dúvidas. De facto ainda tenho dúvidas em como mapear um terreno onde crescem ervas e não há arbustos. Até ao momento em  todas as centrais fotovoltaicas  mapeadas em Portugal e Espanha  por exemplo os mapeadores envolvidos mapearam o terreno onde existem painéis solares como prado. No entanto, se tiveres uma melhor proposta, todos nós os que mapeamos Centrais Fotovoltaicas gostaríamos de a ouvir.
Cumprimentos
TL
umapjpnic793 (2024-11-07 08:16:53+00:00): Hi, This elevator position has been changed due to incorrect editing results, change that is not what his project intended. (hotosm)
MARTINCRUZE (2024-11-07 01:07:55+00:00): 删除个人早期粗糙的landuse
CurlingMan13 (2024-11-07 14:43:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM!

Looks like you corrected the errors in your second changeset.  Don't forget to close the notes after adding the business.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4510013
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-11-07 01:43:44+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 157567247, 157589107, 157589241, 157589450, 157589561, 157589871, 157589975, 157590171, 157590272, 157590418, 157590467, 157590540, 157590728, 157590765.
MARTINCRUZE (2024-11-07 01:52:36+00:00): 删除个人早期粗糙的landuse。Delete personal early rough drawing, plan to redraw
MARTINCRUZE (2024-11-07 02:06:43+00:00): plan to redraw
Glassman (2024-11-07 17:53:51+00:00): Don't forget to square the buildings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158839157
Glassman (2024-11-07 17:49:32+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158839307
Glassman (2024-11-07 17:55:31+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158839312
Glassman (2024-11-07 17:55:33+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158839329
Glassman (2024-11-07 18:01:05+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158839339
Glassman (2024-11-07 17:47:38+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158839342
Glassman (2024-11-07 17:49:42+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158839346
CurlingMan13 (2024-11-08 00:33:41+00:00): "Q" can be used to square buildings and give them square angles.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158839349
Cocomocha (2024-11-08 00:46:38+00:00): Thank you for letting me know! That was very helpful.
CurlingMan13 (2024-11-08 01:09:59+00:00): No problem, and welcome to OSM!

Also, you can do more than one edit in a changeset.  So instead of just adding one business, you can do 10 or 20.  Just make sure you submit your changesets before you go to the other side of the world.

Keep up the good work and let me know if you have any questions.  You're learning quick.
Cocomocha (2024-11-08 02:46:53+00:00): Thank you!
Glassman (2024-11-07 17:55:40+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158839360
umapjpnic793 (2024-11-07 08:43:45+00:00): OpenStreetMapへようこそ、最初の編集をいただき、ありがとうございます。 
編集されました駐車場について、地物がまだ存在していることを示しながら、何らかの理由で利用されていないか、利用出来ない場合は、代わりに disused:amenity=parking タグで存在を示すことを検討ください。確認の程よろしくおねがいします。
user_8655426 (2024-11-10 00:09:11+00:00): この変更セットをリバートしました。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158952655

・JA:破壊行為
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:破壊行為

このアカウントはブロックされる可能性があります。
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158839376
Glassman (2024-11-07 17:57:47+00:00): We don't use descriptive names like Basketball Court. Instead it should be tagged as  leisure=pitch + sport=basketball. pitch is the British English term for a court. Can you update this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158839410
Glassman (2024-11-07 17:47:53+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158839473
Glassman (2024-11-07 17:48:03+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158839550
Glassman (2024-11-07 17:50:12+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. Don't forget to square the buildings
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158839571
Glassman (2024-11-07 17:42:41+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158839585
Glassman (2024-11-07 17:50:22+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158839599
Glassman (2024-11-07 17:51:22+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158839636
Glassman (2024-11-07 17:59:58+00:00): Looks good but remember to square the buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158839656
Glassman (2024-11-07 18:04:27+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158839664
sw_uwu (2024-11-14 20:30:53+00:00): Danke für den fix, leider wird entrance=yes automatisch zu entrance=unspecified geändert in rapid also könnten noch ein paar davon verteilt sein☹️
i2004 (2024-11-08 16:12:26+00:00): como sabes que cruzan por tedin
AgusQui (2024-11-10 23:22:07+00:00): Me avisó otro usuario, el de Bacigalupo fue restringido para conservarlo, acá hay una noticia: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=522105243286793&id=100064619658909&set=a.309441661219820
GeeMaps! (2024-11-16 21:57:00+00:00): Hi & (a little bit late!) welcome to OSM! Thanks for your work but one little thing to mention. waterway=dock is used for actual drydocks - in OSM, jetties like this one are tagged as a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man%20made=pier?uselang=en, either as a node, as you've done here, or as an area, following their actual outline. Thanks!
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-07 10:19:02+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158774212
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:43:20+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165095451
nevw (2024-11-08 02:00:15+00:00): Hi, you are creating invalid multipolygon relations. Our wiki has extensive documentation on multipolygon validity.
Outer rings of mp cannot share sides. 
You should just use simple polygons for these type of buildings or use the building:part method where you would draw a polygon around the outside perimeter and then draw the individual sections as building:parts. These are especially for representing buildings in 3 dimensions but can also be used for simpler mapping like this.
nevw (2024-11-08 02:05:23+00:00): Osmi detects these mapping errors
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.23220&lat=-37.79508&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
nevw (2024-11-08 23:06:44+00:00): Another alternative is to construct them as TheSwavu has done, making a mp of each part and reusing the common section in each mp.
Sandswell (2024-11-09 11:20:13+00:00): Ah, I was actually trying to combine them into one, so I clicked merge. It seemed to do what I wanted; didn't realise I made an illegal polygon.
Thanks for your help
mweper (2024-11-07 23:03:14+00:00): Please provide the source from which you obtained this two-way information, as both official maps and signs show that it is one-way to San Martin.

* https://infomapa.rosario.gov.ar/emapa/mapa.htm
* https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2914872802059818
Pavans (2024-11-09 08:55:16+00:00): Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have reverted the edit . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. 
Thank you
ika-chan! (2024-11-10 05:32:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted because it added corner filter roads that did not exist in real life: see https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=37.93058252726047&z=17&lng=22.877575725614975&pKey=663597292401914&focus=photo .

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158955770
eggie (2024-11-07 08:59:13+00:00): Dag Westerling..

Meestal zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van eenrichtingsverkeer.
In dat geval toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no.. en dit evt ook voor mofa en moped.

Het zal anders niet goed routeren.

Mvg
eggie
eggie (2024-11-07 09:27:07+00:00): Als voorbeeld kun je tagging in de Bosstraat gebruiken.
eggie (2024-11-07 12:24:16+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast. Mochten de onderborden met uitzonderingen zijn verwijderd laat het dan even weten.
MVG
eggie
Westerling (2024-11-07 16:23:17+00:00): Dank voor het aanpassen eggie. Ik was niet in de gelegenheid om het eerder te doen. Onderborden zijn nog actueel.
eggie (2024-11-07 17:04:53+00:00): Had de editor toch open.. dus dan maar gelijk weer actueel. 

Volgende week kun je de routering testen voor tweewielers.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=53.140728%2C7.021283%3B53.138391%2C7.028064#map=16/53.14043/7.02633
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-07 10:25:02+00:00): Does the cemetery have to be completely deleted just because it was not mapped accurately?

I think this changeset should be reverted.
aTarom (2024-11-07 07:26:25+00:00): Don't mix normal edits with acts of vandalism and it won't be reverted;
We're not babysitters and by the way, don't insult
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158803407
Please stop creating puppet accounts
eggie (2024-11-07 09:16:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Jordi MF (2024-11-07 15:15:09+00:00): Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).
El usuario realiza múltiples y pequeñas ediciones para dificultar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados. Los mayores errores son que modifica la toponimia oficial para que no aparezca en valenciano aunque así lo dictamine la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua en la cartografía oficial de la Comunitat Valenciana. Tenemos permiso explícito de esta entidad que, según las leyes autonómicas, es la entidad encargada de la toponimia oficial. Tampoco no tiene en cuenta la cartelería local que aparece en calles, carreteras y sendas.
Por otra parte, este usuario (y todas sus cuentas) está mapeando según las ortofotos y sin tener en cuenta el conocimiento local para delimitar si los elementos se tratan de edificios en ruinas, muros u otros elementos e, incluso, elimina PDIs con todo el historial de forma injustificada.
Ante todo lo expuesto y por las diversas anomalías, revierto todos los changesets porque, de revisar cada uno de ellos, únicamente nos dedicaríamos a ello, como si fuésemos administradores. En caso de revisar todas las ediciones de este usuario que ya ha sido bloqueado por 10 años con otras cuentas, nunca podríamos seguir mejorando la base de datos debido a revisar durante horas cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158860309
Jordi MF (2024-11-07 15:15:10+00:00): Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).
El usuario realiza múltiples y pequeñas ediciones para dificultar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados. Los mayores errores son que modifica la toponimia oficial para que no aparezca en valenciano aunque así lo dictamine la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua en la cartografía oficial de la Comunitat Valenciana. Tenemos permiso explícito de esta entidad que, según las leyes autonómicas, es la entidad encargada de la toponimia oficial. Tampoco no tiene en cuenta la cartelería local que aparece en calles, carreteras y sendas.
Por otra parte, este usuario (y todas sus cuentas) está mapeando según las ortofotos y sin tener en cuenta el conocimiento local para delimitar si los elementos se tratan de edificios en ruinas, muros u otros elementos e, incluso, elimina PDIs con todo el historial de forma injustificada.
Ante todo lo expuesto y por las diversas anomalías, revierto todos los changesets porque, de revisar cada uno de ellos, únicamente nos dedicaríamos a ello, como si fuésemos administradores. En caso de revisar todas las ediciones de este usuario que ya ha sido bloqueado por 10 años con otras cuentas, nunca podríamos seguir mejorando la base de datos debido a revisar durante horas cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158860309
marczoutendijk (2024-11-12 15:43:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16863

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
habi (2025-08-20 06:52:31+00:00): Der Kiesstrand war schon hier erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1275509194
Ich habe die beiden Dinge zusammengeführt, und wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4919445 den Namen entfernt.
Anastasiya_Vakulich (2024-12-02 06:03:32+00:00): #mapbox_roads_attributes
Jrachi (2024-11-07 07:43:46+00:00): Ciao.
Posso nuovamente chiedere se hai bisogno di aiuto con le relazioni?

Ivo
Barroszt (2024-11-27 13:27:30+00:00): Cieszy nas to, że dołączyłaś do naszej społeczności, zalecam zapoznanie się z najważniejszymi zalecaniemi społeczności OSM, w celu uniknięcia kontrowersji, gdyby każdy edytował na swój sposób, np. parkingi, byłby istny miszmasz, dokładność, spójność i prawdziwość musi być. Zaokrąglanie niepotrzebne.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-28 13:00:24+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12320105153/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Alt9800 (2025-08-28 15:19:22+00:00): Thanks for the comment! It seems this POI was a temporary note I made about staircase locations while organizing the spatial relationships of shops in a small market building during a survey using Every Door. I'll change it to an appropriate POI (or a LineString named “Stairs”).
Alt9800 (2025-08-28 15:22:11+00:00): Set entrance=staircase to explicitly designate it as the entrance to the second floor.
SNT-Diderot-AB (2024-11-07 20:11:57+00:00): Changeset deleted via these 2 changesets :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158870191
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158870286
hatul (2024-12-09 09:42:24+00:00): הי עודד, תודה על התוספות למפה אבל אטרקציה לא מיועדת לתיאורים של בעיות בדרך.
Jerry_W2k (2024-11-08 13:49:02+00:00): Droga jeszcze w budowie, udostępniona do ruchu zostanie 15.11.2024 https://czaschojnic.pl/artykul/znamy-juz-termin-przejezdnosci-n1384364
Affiand (2026-07-12 18:58:27+00:00): Salateira на Олешева 5 не существует и никогда не существовало
LockOnGuy (2024-11-07 13:01:32+00:00): Hello, Can you explain what and why it is "bad naming"? And maybe a source to back the naming, example for way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260285732/history      
Regards.
Mahdi Nameghi (2024-11-16 06:52:49+00:00): Name must match street sign.
Other names must be in alt_name tag or loc_name
LockOnGuy (2024-11-16 11:29:02+00:00): But here you deleted those names entirely, you did not move them to alt_name. Please do restore those names that you deleted as alt_name. Regards.
Luzandro (2024-11-07 11:42:43+00:00): Hallo,

warum hast du hier ein kurzes way-Stück für das gate angelegt, anstatt das gate auf einen node zu legen, wie üblich?
 
Man kann barriere=gate prinzipiell auch als way modellieren, dann repräsentiert dieser allerdings die genauen Maße/Position des gates und kreuzt den Weg, der von dem gate verschlossen wird (und ist nicht Teil davon, wie hier, abgesehen vom Schnittpunkt). 

Es empfiehlt sich auch, entsprechende access-Werte zu setzen, wer das Tor passieren oder nicht passieren darf, ansonsten müssen Router selbst entsprechende Annahmen treffen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier=gate?uselang=de
Flexman (2024-11-07 11:47:10+00:00): Hi!
Ich wusste nicht wie man es anders macht, habe aber im OSM-Chat bescheid gegeben, dass mich jemand ausbessern möge falls das so falsch ist.
Du kannst das gerne ausbessern.

Passieren darf das Tor wohl nur, wer einen Schlüssel oder eine Fernbedienung dazu hat. Der Weg steht der Öffentlichkeit damit nicht mehr zur Verfügung.
topolusitania (2024-11-07 10:35:42+00:00): Na area desenhada, entretanto apagada, aparece um veiculo estacionado em: OrtoSat - Portugal Continental - 30cm - 2023 (DGT)
Como se mapeia o que existe no terreno...
JoaoPaixao (2024-11-07 11:01:45+00:00): Aparece o que aparenta ser um veículo, mas onde a imagem em nada te afirma a sua intenção, no caso estacionado.
gillux (2025-03-02 09:28:42+00:00): Le nom du lieu-dit affiché sur le panneau et répertorié par l’administration est bien Teule, mais les anciens l’appelait Teoule en patois (prononcé "Téoulé"), d’après une source qui y a habité dans les années 80, aussi je crois que le Teoule n’était pas qu’une simple faute de frappe. Je suggère de conserver Teoule en tant que nom local (étiquette loc_name), ou en tant que nom dans une autre langue si on la retrouve.
Strubbl (2024-11-07 21:09:26+00:00): sollte der Link werden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4499983
eggie (2024-11-07 09:35:25+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Bedankt voor uw mutatie..  Er staan nog wat notes open op de kaart weg te werken.
MVG
eggie
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-07 10:15:21+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158847515
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-07 10:15:32+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158847305
habi (2024-11-07 12:33:33+00:00): Ciao Lucia55555

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Es ist praktischer, wenn du deine Änderungen In OpenStreepMap logisch und geographisch bündelst, also eine Änderung für die Bank am Flussufer machst und den VOI in Bern in einer anderen Änderung hochlädst.

Gerade beim VOI würde ich 'VOI Schosshalde' im alternativen Namen lassen, damit die OpenStreetMap-Suche diesen so finden kann.

Gruss aus Bern,
habi
habi (2024-11-07 12:34:42+00:00): Die Namensänderung habe ich in rückgängig gemacht

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158854169
NeisBot (2024-11-07 10:26:23+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and changesets, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-08 06:42:48+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158882675
NeisBot (2024-11-07 10:26:00+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and changesets, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-08 06:43:07+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158882683
habi (2024-12-10 10:31:59+00:00): Ciao 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/335045733 is *not* a building, you've added it here as `building=patinoire_extérieure`. 
It is tagged as `leisure=ice_rink` with `seasonal=yes`, which is already good enough.
I thus removed the building-tag.
Happy mapping,
habi