piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Branko Kokanovic (2026-02-07 12:04:33+00:00): Zdravo!
Vidim da unosis imena ulica. Mozda ce ti znaciti da znas da postoji DINA sajt koji smo koristili da unesemo preostale i sredimo sve ulice u Srbiji: https://dina.openstreetmap.rs/. Tu mozes da vidis sve ulice, sta fali, da uporedis geometrije iz RGZ-a i u OSM-u. Imas i nase podloge gde mozes u editoru da vidis RGZ geometrije.

Samo da ti kazem da obicno pored imena ulice stavljamo i "int_name" (internacionalno ime, tj. ime bez nasih kvacica) i "ref:RS:ulica" (to je identifikacija ulice u RGZ-u kojom je "vezujemo" za adresni registar, pa onda mozemo da radimo razne analize i uocavamo greske).

Poz!
nexi_ (2026-02-07 17:05:07+00:00): Hvala!
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-05 02:53:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13518727170

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
giubar (2026-03-10 00:34:36+00:00): Ciao gsgan, ho notato che hai inserito Rambalda Nuova e Rambalda Vecchia come C.ra, posso quale fonte hai? Dalle fonti disponibili l'ho sempre trovata nominata Malga e non Casera. Grazie
gsgan (2026-03-10 06:41:09+00:00): Ho ricavato il nome dalla Carta Tecnica Regionale. Poi da casa te ne mando un estratto. Mi sembrava importante mantenere i vecchi toponimi che indicavano le attività. Ma i tempi sono scambiati si può amnche chiamare solo Malga... ciao.
gsgan (2026-03-10 10:56:51+00:00): Ciao Giubar, ti allego link per vedere la porzione di carta tecnica regionale:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GN4v4-LZ8ruHqaTio03ipDBlHiwGucVi/view?usp=share_link
pitfire (2026-02-02 10:05:53+00:00): Hallo Jule_Beuel,

Der Tag bicycle=use_sidepath kann bei Straßen gesetzt werden, um auf die Benutzungspflicht eines parallelen Radweges hinzuweisen. Dazu sollte auf der Haupttrasse aber nicht gleichzeitig ein Eintrag mit "cycleway:both=no" bestehen bleiben. Dies gilt besonders für den Bereich (Im Schlämmchen). Für den gemeinsamen Rad-Fussweg Weg: 32800396 sollte es oneway no sein und die Strassentrasse bekommt im Eintrag "Fahrradinfrastruktur" ein cycleway:left=separate

VG pitfire
eggie (2026-02-02 12:24:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-02 12:25:54+00:00): Tip..  Probeer altijd de originele BAG node te behouden. Gewoon de bedrijfsinfo verwijderen en dan de nieuwe info er weer op.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-02 12:33:30+00:00): De fromat van de opeingstijden klopten niet.
Ik heb er nu ma t/m zat van gemaakt. Svp even checken.
Gebruik anders deze tool.
https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/?oh=Mo-Sa%2010:00-17:30

MVG
eggie
Kathl1 (2026-02-02 15:42:27+00:00): De gewone bedrijfsinfo verwijderen lukte me helaas. Niet. Dank vor de aanpassingen.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-05 07:43:10+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13518790725

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2026-02-02 07:53:22+00:00): Hi nilloc29, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 86% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 40 highway(s)
- 16 name(s)
- 26 surface(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177994345
nilloc29 (2026-02-02 09:13:06+00:00): I am trying to clean up the roads on public lands in Washington state. I have explored these areas and am going through my notes. I am using LIDAR and satellite imagery as well.
On public lands there are a lot of "roads" that are overgrown and essentially impossible to even walk. They do not go to any destination and were not meant to be kept in service. The imported data was also very inaccurate so the road mapping does not match reality for most of them. I am fixing the routing of open roads but the multitude of poorly mapped unusable roads are cluttering the map and make navigation difficult. Their presence is misleading because it is not indicated that they are unusable and the mapping is so inaccurate. I am also trying to improve the symbology to indicate which roads are the primary maintained routes and which are the "service roads" that are still usable but not well maintained.

My career is in public land management, including 8 seasons with the USFS. I have a good grasp on how to evaluate the road systems to determine if they are useful to the public. If the roads I am removing were to be added back and tagged as decommissioned, they would need to be remapped. Remapping by hand with the USFS road layer as a source for names and LIDAR for reference would be the only method I know of. With the lack of attention to rural areas in OpenStreetMap, I do not see that as being a reasonable expectation any time soon.
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-02 10:43:07+00:00): Hi nilloc29, thank you for your reply.

I’ve reviewed some of the ways you removed, and it seems that several (possibly many?) of them were tagged quite well, including the use of abandoned:* tags. In my opinion, these ways should not have been deleted.

I understand that removing unusable ways may simplify navigation for your application. However, I believe it would be better if the navigation software respected and interpreted the existing OSM tagging instead of removing mapped features that are still valid as abandoned objects.

Best regards,
Pascal
Omnific (2026-02-02 16:15:38+00:00): For both this changeset and the Darrington one, I think the right move might be to revert the deleted roads and retag them as abandoned. It accomplishes the same reasonable goal as nilloc29, but doesn't destroy data that might still be valid in some limited capacity, either now or in the future.
nilloc29 (2026-02-02 23:29:10+00:00): The primary mapping software platforms I am aware of that use OpenStreetMap for public lands data are Onyx and Gaia.

Both convert the data to very similar symbologies. The abandoned roads either look just like other roads or trails depending on whether OpenStreetMaps has them as paths, service roads, or unclassified roads. The OpenStreetMaps data is extremely inconsistent in which line type is selected. 

I am unsure if you have experience with what abandoned forest roads look like but in my experience, over 95% of those that walk across them are totally unaware that they are technically on a road. Having essentially nonexistent roads litter the map is dangerous because the vast majority of map users will assume that they will be able to use those mapped features to navigate the terrain.

The inclusion of the abandoned roads in the dataset is very patchy. Many road beds that are clearly visible on LIDAR were not included in tbe data import. If all the abandoned roads were mapped with appropriate symbology, they could be useful. The inclusion of roads fully reclaimed by nature or that never existed and exclusion of roads that are obvious routes causes a great deal of confusion, even to those experienced with navigating mountainous public land.

The accuracy of the data is also extremely varied. Many of the abandoned roads barely overlap where they are mapped as existing.

I could use guidance on how rural public roads are meant to be mapped. The data as it is has so many inconsistencies that the goal is very unclear. There also does not seem to be much work being done on the areas I am interested in improving. When I tried to learn by suggesting fixes, another user got very angry that I was suggesting so many fixes in areas not being actively edited.

I want to do things the "right way" but the goal seems rather opaque and the insular mapping community has not been very welcoming from my experience. I am willing to sink hundreds of hours into editing if someone can please lay out how I should be doing it. If the goal is to actually map the hundreds of thousands of miles of abandoned roads on public land, I can focus in on some problem areas and get to work. I had thought that seemed infeasible on the scale of 301,000 square miles of forest service land, but if that is the goal, I can work toward it on a local scale.
Omnific (2026-02-03 01:49:28+00:00): I think you are misunderstanding. Roads tagged abandoned:highway=track/service/etc. do not show up on Gaia or Onyx. They don't show up on the OSM map either, not directly, and they are not used for routing.
Omnific (2026-02-03 01:59:57+00:00): As a followup, I do appreciate where you're coming from and what you're trying to do. It is very reasonable, and it's something I've done a lot of myself. It's underappreciated work. However, we want to make sure no real data is being destroyed. Roads sometimes don't show up on LIDAR imagery due to any number of reasons. Since you are armchair mapping (which I do too in these areas), we don't have ground confirmation that the roads fully don't exist. That's why using the abandoned: prefix works so well: it doesn't destroy the data fully in case the road is still there in some form, but it hides the road from the map (and theoretically on all apps as well), and prevents it from being used for routing on every app I know of (Gaia/Trailforks/OrganicMaps/etc.).
nilloc29 (2026-02-03 05:29:00+00:00): If the abandoned prefix works as you describe, that does sound like a good option. In this area the abandoned roads were showing as "unmaintained trails" on GAIA. That is not typical symbology.

Did you already revert my edits or shall I do so this weekend?

I am not doing armchair mapping as you might imagine. I have driven these road systems and have notes. There are some cases where I have been in the viscinity but not seen every spur or gone far enough to see the washout I know is present from my research. I have cross referenced my findings in the field with what is shown on LIDAR and the official USFS road layer. In mountainous terrain it is typically very clear which roads have become naturalized. Flat terrain is a very different story. I take tracks while driving or walking roads in flat terrain that need corrections.

As I mentioned before, I have worked on several forests and explored them thoroughly.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-03 07:33:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13518720899

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-04 05:13:11+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13518720899

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-05 02:53:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13518720899

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-05 07:43:08+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13518720899

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2026-02-02 08:36:22+00:00): Hi nilloc29, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 94% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 9 highway(s)
- 3 name(s)
- 7 surface(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177995716
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-02 11:21:00+00:00): Same again, please see my comment here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177994345#c1550029
❤️‍🔥 (2026-02-02 08:51:04+00:00): Hi, what are you trying to achieve with these edits? 

if you ignore those validator warnings, it creates an enourmous mess that someone will probably revert. 

we don't map each individual lane as a lane, the previous layout was already correct...
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-02 08:40:04+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 158765880, 158825125, 158914807, 177864995, 177865074, 177865285, 177865431, 177865724, 177865760, 177869327, 177873605, 177873691, 177874541, 177875151, 177901612, 177901716, 177905529, 177906372, 177906644, 177907185, 177914282, 177914556, 177948936, 177950130, 177958229, 177987351.
ratrun (2026-02-10 05:01:24+00:00): Hi,
to me the edit of user Planalkol seems unrealistic. I found you already commented the same here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177944692

Given his  useless changeset comments and 8 days without response I would remove these two new tertiary ways.

What do you think?
BCNorwich (2026-02-10 07:04:27+00:00): Hi Ratrun, Yes, I completely agree. I couldn't find any planning or proposal for the roads so please remove them.

Regards Bernard.
ratrun (2026-02-10 08:04:36+00:00): Thank you for the confirmation. Removed.
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 04:49:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). You have duplicate residential highway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1473546388#map=18/17.066901/82.140007, when another exists https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444712600#map=15/17.06454/82.14194
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177996264
BCNorwich (2026-02-03 08:33:37+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed these roads, Way: Kodashpally (1473548429), Way: Chandur (1473548430), Way: Shivanna Gudem (1473548432) because they duplicated existing highways which could disrupt routing. Please make corrections to the existing features.

Regards Bernard.
woodpeck (2026-02-02 09:02:23+00:00): Dear Dimitrios, when uploading data to OSM you are asked for a changeset comment. This comment tells other mappers what you were doing. If they look at the edit history for an area, they can immediately see "ah, there was an edit by Dimitirios here where he added buildings". At least that is what it should be. With your edits, all that everybody sees is "ah, there was an edit by Dimitrios here where he #hotosm-project-26175 #YouthMappers #YouthMappersAGU #YouthMappersSrinakharinwirot #tomtom #FuruhashiLab #AoyamaGSC #OSMBirthday2025EAP #tt_event #JPTHmapathon2025". 

This is not helpful. Please write changeset comments that actually describe your edits ("traced buildings in XY" or so). What do these hashtags even mean? Why are you making edits related to some OSM birthday or mapathon from last year? What do your edits have to do with TomTom or Furuhashi? This does not make sense. Please stop it.
Dimitrios Spatharis (2026-02-02 09:48:07+00:00): Hi woodpeck,

I understand your point and I’m sorry for the confusion my changeset comments caused.

You’re absolutely right that a changeset comment should describe the edit itself. In my case, the upload description ended up containing only those tags/hashtags, which makes it look like the edit is related to various campaigns (OSM birthday/mapathon/TomTom/FuruhashiLab), even though that’s not what I was trying to communicate.

To be honest, I’m still relatively new and I think I may have been using a preset/template that auto-filled the comment field with those tags — and I didn’t realize that leaving it like that would be unhelpful (or misleading). I also see that several of my previous changesets were uploaded with the same set of tags, so I understand why this looks strange from the outside.

I will stop using hashtag-only comments and will write clear, descriptive changeset comments from now on, along with a proper source tag.

If you don’t mind: could you share an example of a “good” changeset tagging/comment style for this type of edit in that area (e.g., a short comment + any tags you consider useful)? I’d really appreciate a concrete example so I can follow best practice and avoid causing confusion again.

Sorry again, and thanks for helping me improve.

Best regards,
Dimitrios
bxl-forever (2026-02-02 23:08:57+00:00): Pardon my curiosity but you have just created a tram stop for Olympic Village Station, here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13518901699
which is connected to a disused way, having "note=no longer running".

This tram stop will now show as an active station, despite there is probably no service here.  Can you please have a second look.
arjunaraoc (2026-02-17 00:41:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178654054 , Follow guidelines at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names and update your edits where required
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177996987
NeisBot (2026-02-03 06:10:55+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1318953120 v1 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/12206538200 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177997031
NeisReview (2026-02-11 05:07:33+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178034967
TrickyFoxy (2026-03-05 21:49:11+00:00): Что вы имели в виду?
hikidvn1 (2026-02-02 09:09:13+00:00): https://hikid.vn/
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1v3udWtZxY9TRfkMWTcwNjEa5OV_2FmYq
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MUc5ylXpj-jDEn5OEW1woIVyMccPAfXpOOW8TRXJ9AM/edit?usp=drivesdk
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1z1A-0VdcmeYhfFKsOiE6IasrKnb78Xd7
https://sites.google.com/view/suahikid/trang-chu
https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1jSC1gqqKyoeIjzIU5rXCtXpxUhQscv8&ll=16.083766985141875%2C105.80356199999999&z=6
https://suahikidvn.blogspot.com/2026/02/hikid-vi-socola.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vKxmhksikI
https://www.pearltrees.com/hikidvn#item778369224
https://creators.spotify.com/pod/profile/hikid/episodes/Sa-Hikid-h-tr-tng-cn-khoa-hc-cho-tr-e3egshk/a-acet72v
https://www.scoop.it/topic/hikid-viet-nam/p/4169950183/2026/02/02/hikid-viet-nam-phan-phoi-chinh-hang-boi-cong-ty-tnhh-xnk-tm-phuong-linh
BCNorwich (2026-02-03 08:23:29+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed Way: Poleramma thalli temple road (1473554043), because it duplicates an existing highway which could disrupt routing. Please make any corrections to existing features.

Regards Bernard.
arjunaraoc (2026-02-17 00:37:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Name of town is not part of  theatre name.  My sample updates https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178653946 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178653926  Check guidelines in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names and update your edits where required
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177997243
Warin61 (2026-02-03 06:59:52+00:00): Reverted. Fully.
user_23564325 (2026-02-03 09:54:07+00:00): Thats fair. my apologies for that. I was using the NSW base map, but i think the arial images is best. Is that what you use for edits?
Warin61 (2026-02-05 10:59:21+00:00): You can view any ones edits and what they report as the source or sources... 

eg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Natiso/history#map=9/-32.844/151.627&layers=Y

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Warin61/history#map=6/-38.12/161.24&layers=Y

You have to click through to each changeset to check the source. In NSW I use the DCS Base Map, DCS Imagery, DCS is good for location accuracy .. Esri Imagery too, this is more upto date but can be offset location wise.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-02 19:03:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13518986911

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-02 23:42:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13518986911

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-03 00:22:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13518986911

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀