piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Syl (2026-02-07 08:47:54+00:00): Bonjour, je pense que la bonne pratique aurait été de garder ce nœud qui était bien placé et qui contenait des informations pas présentes dans le doublon. Si ça vous va je veux bien m'occuper de le restaurer et de copier les informations pertinentes de l'autre qui est mal positionné.
CelianGdfrd (2026-02-07 08:50:21+00:00): J'ai zappé qu'il y avait des infos sur ce nœud et ai agi trop vite : en effet il est pertinent de fusionner "mon" nœud sur celui-ci ! Merci
Syl (2026-02-07 09:14:46+00:00): Je viens de le faire.
Mais j'ai l'impression qu'il a manqué une dernière étape de vérification de la communauté avant import. La valeur pour la spécialité c'est "venereology" pas "venerology", les noms ressemblent plus à une description de leurs positions qu'à des vrais noms et le wiki conseille toujours d'utiliser "centre" alors que c'est "counselling" qui est utilisé ici (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:type:FR:FINESS#638).
joost schouppe (2026-03-25 10:38:49+00:00): Hi Fabf,
For places that take care of small children, but are not nursery schools, we do not use amenity=kindergarten but https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dchildcare
lampronessa (2026-02-06 23:03:03+00:00): Correction: Sources used were Bing Aerial Imagery and Kartaview.
limes11 (2026-02-06 23:08:05+00:00): Hallo,

bitte entferne sämtliche @id - tags. Diese sind falsch und redundant.

Bzgl. ref:hafas_id. "_id" ist ebenfalls obsolet. Zu ref:hafas kann ich wenig sagen, kenne ich nicht.

Danke
Ótzï fón GlüϷgor (2026-02-06 23:09:51+00:00): ref:hafas_id ist eine Datenbanknummer die jede Haltestelle im RMV-Gebiet hat und insbesondere von Fahrplanapps genutzt wird, um Anfragen für bestimmte Haltestellen an die RMV-API zu schicken (also sehr relevant)
limes11 (2026-02-06 23:13:04+00:00): Ok aber bitte ohne "_id", der Begriff "ref" sagt bereits aus, dass es sich um eine Referenz/ID handelt.
Ótzï fón GlüϷgor (2026-02-06 23:20:48+00:00): Gut, ich werde die Hafas-ID unter dem Tag ref:hafas hinterlegen
felipeeugenio (2026-02-06 23:37:28+00:00): Hola Julián. Se dibuja la base de las estructuras con el tag building. No se hacen dibujos esquméticos de algo que está "mas o menos" en un lugar. Todas estas estructuras no coinciden con lo que se ve en el satélite.
De esto solo vale la pena rescatar el asilo para ansianos, el resto se tendrá que eliminar. de verdad por favor darte el tiempo de dibujar las cosas tal como se ven en terreno.

Gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178209161
mweper (2026-02-07 01:37:30+00:00): Hola. 
building=school, solo se debe marcar a los edificios en sí y no todo el área sin edificios. Para marcar todo el área escolar puede usarse amenity=school y para todo un predio educativo más amplio, landuse=school
mweper (2026-02-07 01:38:27+00:00): Perdón, el predio educativo es landuse=education
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:42:54+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13530287096 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "کلینیک زیبایی"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-16 05:33:15+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178222841
Frans S (2026-02-07 17:38:23+00:00): Hello. 
Sorry to say, This is no waterbody.
I removed it.
Best regards
dreua (2026-04-07 15:43:08+00:00): Hallo und danke fürs Eintragen!

Hab gerade eine Notiz dazu erstellt, aber vielleicht ist die Frage auch hier im Changeset gut aufgehoben:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?note=4783652

"Die Hängebrücke ist anscheinend fertig gebaut und z.B. aus dem Zug schon gut sichtbar, wird aber in den üblichen Ansichten/Apps noch nicht gerendert. Wollen wir das construction Prefix schon mal entfernen und bis zur Eröffnung access=no lassen?"
dreua (2026-06-25 16:22:35+00:00): So Sachen wie den operator in ALL CAPS bitte zukünftig in normale Schreibweise konvertieren, die Marketingleute stehen da wohl drauf, aber in der OSM DB soll das möglichst angepasst sein. Steht auch im Wiki unter name glaube ich, aber das kann natürlich nicht jeder wissen.
Frans S (2026-02-07 17:39:29+00:00): Hello again
This is no waterbody
Best regards
MI-MGraf (2026-02-07 00:22:27+00:00): x-ref to Google Map: https://maps.app.goo.gl/crhNeC4xGwuQPcMw8
sembelst134 (2026-02-19 09:17:44+00:00): Hallo, möchte gern fragen ob Aral dort neuerdings tatsächlich andere Ladestationen als die sonst überall üblichen Alpitronic HYC300 verbaut hat?
Online finde ich auch keine ABB Station die 300kW mit 3 Ausgängen unterstützt, so wie es angezeigt wird 
https://www.goingelectric.de/stromtankstellen/Deutschland/Dresden/Aral-Tankstelle-Werftstrasse-Werftstrasse-13/69439/
sembelst134 (2026-02-19 09:20:59+00:00): oder ich seh gerade, wurde sich da mit copy/paste von der Shell etwas südlicher bedient?
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:41:37+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 14 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/703263628 v4 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/325067706 v6 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/6604384007 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178210800
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:42:55+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13530427196 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Heating and cooling service"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-16 05:33:17+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178610731
(No visible changes after review)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-05 03:42:21+00:00): Fixed SEO spam name=*, malformed address tags and added missing top-level tag for POI in changeset 183672431

https://osm.org/changeset/183672431
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:41:38+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 23 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1083473095 v7 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/706651282 v7 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/28600985 v17 | 7 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178211012
NeisRevert (2026-02-07 13:33:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178228222
where the comment is: "🔄 Revert of unintended geometry change"
santamariense (2026-03-16 20:46:16+00:00): Olá mapeandobr,

Notei que adicionaste "Rotatória" como nome de
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1474901556/history

Na verdade, se não tem nome próprio, deve-se deixar em branco. Seria o mesmo que colocar o nome "Rua" numa rua.

Se for uma rótula de fato (quem tá nela tem prioridade sobre qualquer um que chegue nela), aí ela tem uma tag que define isso e que é muito útil para navegação que é a tag junction=roundabout

Bons mapeamentos.
5m4u9 (2026-02-09 18:10:28+00:00): Hola, todo bien con la importancia de las vías.

Pero en este mapa, y para Bolivia, la elección de "carretera" (trunk), "primaria" (primary), "secundaria" (secondary) y terciaria (tertiary) no solo está dada por la infraestructura sino por la conectividad.

Es decir, no puede haber un "trunk" hacia la nada, por ejemplo el 2do anillo no podría estar solo aislado sin otras vías primarias hacia el 4to anillo que es la carretera de camiones.

La RM1, yo la actualicé recientemente a secundaria para dar continuidad al trazo actual. 

Mi propuesta definitiva es colocar primaria (anaranjada) a la ruta metropolitana-camino urubó-los batos y cerrar hacia el nuevo puente y la av. roca y coronado por la importancia vehicular, pero no lo hice porque necesitamos a alguien que vive ahí para comprobar esa importancia.

mi propuesta de Red Vial de SCZ si quieres ver -> https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/red-vial-santa-cruz-de-la-sierra_1194600

Hasta mientras devolveré la ruta metropolitana a secundaria aunque lo ideal sería primaria :(
george1201 (2026-02-07 19:18:03+00:00): Sieht sehr gut aus. Insbesondere die vielen Details zu den Wegeigenschaften gefallen mir. Ich kann mir den Pfad jetzt richtig bildlich vorstellen.
5m4u9 (2026-02-07 16:08:09+00:00): Hola, bienvenid@ y gracias por mejorar el mapa!

No sabía que ese terreno era de prácticas de CIFEMA, le puse un nombre más corto porque el que pusiste más parece una descripción.
DressyPear4 (2026-02-07 03:16:54+00:00): Olá, informações pessoais não devem ser adicionadas no mapa.
Talvez esse mapa
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/pt-br/
seja mais util pra você
HAALAND_ (2026-02-07 13:40:08+00:00): 感谢您对秦皇岛市的更新优化，辛苦了！
i2004 (2026-02-07 18:20:59+00:00): que corregiste de juramento?
Glassman (2026-02-08 00:12:45+00:00): If you are with the local fire department, OSM can be a great place to add features that might be missing from county and city maps. Let fire hydrants, service roads, ponds, etc. For a better list check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Emergency_facilities_and_amenities
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178213509
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:41:49+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 36 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1253729290 v1 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/28811950 v29 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1253729287 v1 | 7 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/11653931392 v2
https://osm.org/node/275865453 v20

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178213740
NeisReview (2026-02-16 05:33:28+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178263980
aharvey (2026-05-16 11:57:53+00:00): I can't see any markings on this one, so I've changed the tagging.
neuhausr (2026-02-17 22:26:02+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I noticed in this changeset a couple of the footpaths overlap with themselves. Instead of making one giant way that traces back over itself, though, you should make multiple, connected ways. For example the one to the south of Alberta Childrens Hospital might have one long way, and then some shorter ways that connect to it in the middle. Happy mapping!
Frans S (2026-02-07 17:54:44+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please strengthen your knowledge about the tagging of highways
Check this website, please.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa

I remove these odd mappings as well as the other ones with this tagging.
Best regards
Frans S  Global validator
one_half_3544 (2026-03-31 20:56:00+00:00): please don't duplicate the existing lines:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1474948011#map=15/42.45752/79.61027&layers=C is a duplicate of 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1474745848#map=13/42.48100/79.55579&layers=C
one_half_3544 (2026-03-31 20:56:48+00:00): also please connect natural=ridge lines, don't leave the gaps
NeisBot (2026-02-07 07:42:57+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13531358494 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Window store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-16 05:33:17+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178458488
Henry572 (2026-02-15 17:14:01+00:00): Danke für die Bearbeitung, es heißt wohl jetzt Funkenflug: https://kindertagespflege.duesseldorf.de/tagespflegestellen/grosstagespflege-funkenflug/auf-einen-blick/
Kovoschiz (2026-02-07 11:00:01+00:00): Please be careful not to make the entire `building=` as `=restaurant`
silversurfer83 (2026-02-07 08:41:49+00:00): Hi again :)

can you please provide sources for your edits? You jump around Ketsch, Bel Air and Miami in your edits (which is totally fine) but you never give your sources. Please do that in your future edits so we better understand how data was collected. Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178215778
SG86 (2026-02-08 10:19:02+00:00): Ok, I'll do it next time
nevw (2026-02-07 07:18:02+00:00): Hi, please redraw the house outline instead of placing a rectangle over the plot of land
IzzyBizzy45 (2026-02-07 08:16:33+00:00): Updated in Changeset #178217573
TrickyFoxy (2026-02-07 10:23:10+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178221663
NeisBot (2026-02-08 09:25:02+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1474958108 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "football field"

#MapWithoutSpam
broketb (2026-02-13 21:49:05+00:00): I am by no means affiliated commercially with this area at all I assure everyone, just adding more information about this area that's all
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-14 06:26:20+00:00): Thanks for your reply.
nevw (2026-02-07 09:18:05+00:00): Best house in the street!
ljc_jlyb (2026-02-09 15:14:02+00:00): name在ref里，已修正
NeisBot (2026-02-08 09:25:04+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/476887063 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "T Shirt Shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-17 05:34:38+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178659855
(No visible changes after review)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-07 22:59:31+00:00): Consolidated duplicate POIs (one in the wrong location), removed SEO spam and cleaned up other tags in changeset 183802427

https://osm.org/changeset/183802427
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-07 22:59:45+00:00): Consolidated duplicate POIs (one in the wrong location), removed SEO spam and cleaned up other tags in changeset 183802427

https://osm.org/changeset/183802427
NeisBot (2026-02-07 08:45:21+00:00): Hi あじさか_import, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 8 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178218322
あじさか_import (2026-02-07 09:02:03+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reaching out and for reviewing my edits.

Yes, the deletions were intentional.

I am currently working on an import of building footprints from Japan’s MLIT PLATEAU dataset.
This import has been discussed within the local community, permission was obtained in advance, and validation checks were completed before uploading.

In this changeset, existing buildings were removed after being replaced by PLATEAU-derived building outlines.
Because of the large volume of edits, I first uploaded the new building geometries and then performed the deletions in a separate, final step, which resulted in a changeset dominated by deletions.

I understand that this can look concerning from the outside, and I will review and improve my upload process to make the workflow clearer and reduce confusion in the future.

Thank you for taking the time to check, and please feel free to let me know if you have any further questions.

Best regards,
あじさか_import
eggie (2026-02-07 08:57:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-07 08:59:33+00:00): Dag Rkopenstreetmap,

Dit gaat niet helemaal goed. Een fysieke adresnode kan niet zomaar een ander adres worden. De truc is dan de adresnode te ontdoen van de instellingsinfo en dan op de nieuwe adresnode bij taggen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-07 09:00:55+00:00): reverted by changeset Wijzigingenset #178218906
TrickyFoxy (2026-02-07 10:23:11+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178221663
eggie (2026-02-07 09:11:18+00:00): Beste, De info heb ik samengevoegd met de reeds bestaande adresnode 31
Je hoeft in OSM geen adressen aan te maken. Die zijn er al. 
MVG
eggie
Sakari_N (2026-02-07 12:06:57+00:00): Moi,

Tämä on kyllä ennemmin driveway, päätellen siitä että se johtaa vain yhden rakennuksen pihaan.
HantDX (2026-02-07 10:38:45+00:00): А откуда вы взяли, что каплица в Вяте расположена именно в этом месте? На спутниковых снимках похоже, что это просто хозпостройка при деревенском доме.
HantDX (2026-02-07 10:39:32+00:00): Я сам долгое время искал в интернете точное местоположение этой каплицы, но нигде нет координат :/.
HantDX (2026-02-07 10:42:14+00:00): Я вообще думал, что каплица - это вот это здание: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1474969343. Но я сам не уверен всё ещё.
Антон-1983 (2026-02-10 18:39:18+00:00): Здравствуйте. Взял, не посмотрев с Гугла точку. Извиняюся. 

Долго всматривался в здания деревни - перенёс. На Гугл-снимках вроде правильно рассмотрел тень башни с колоколом. 

Напротив, на кладбище я так думаю ещё одна, но уже маленькая часовня.
HantDX (2026-02-10 21:32:31+00:00): Спасибо за ваш вклад! Да, я тоже перепроверил спутниковые снимки, похоже на правду. Я потом ещё дополню тэги каплицы. По поводу кладбища, да, на Глобусе упомянута капличка там.
TrickyFoxy (2026-02-07 10:23:12+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178221663
rempshaener (2026-02-08 19:35:48+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Ich habe einige kleine Anmerkungen zu den erfassten Daten:
- Farben: Die Farbangabe bei Unterflurhydranten dürfte nicht richtig sein. Nur zur Klarstellung: Das ist die Farbe, die der Hydrant vor Ort hat. Das hat nichts mit der Darstellung in Karten oder Apps zu tun.
- fire_hydrant:position: Wenn du „sidewalk“ angibst, sollte die Straße auch einen Gehweg haben. Bei einer ersten Durchsicht wäre ein größerer Teil „green“ oder „lane“.
- addr:street: Hydranten haben keine Adresse im Sinne des addr:*-Schemas. 
Dass überhaupt Adressen an Hydranten erfasst werden, ist zumindest nicht unstrittig. 
Sofern das unumgänglich ist, erfolgt dies mittels object:*-Schema, siehe osm.wiki/DE:Key:object:* oder z. B. in „description“
Bitte vermeide möglichst die Erfassung solcher redundanter Daten.

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
TrickyFoxy (2026-03-14 08:16:54+00:00): 👋 К сожалению Яндекс.Карты для правок использовать нельзя.

Как вы могли заметить, там необязательно правильная информация. Но главное что у нас нет разрешния её использовать.
Frans S (2026-02-07 17:48:16+00:00): Hello.
Here you extended an unclassified road and tagged it as a path, named it as 'road' and added many additional accesses.
It is common practice to tag the road the same as the one you connect to when the image stays the same.
Just highway=unclassified is sufficient.
Best regards
TrickyFoxy (2026-02-07 10:29:05+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178221847
eggie (2026-02-07 10:45:13+00:00): Dag Rex,

Dit was toevallig geen officiële adresnode... dus alles kon weg.
Je zou shop=vacant kunnen taggen op de bestaande adresnode.

MVG
eggie
TrickyFoxy (2026-02-07 10:23:13+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178221663
Frans S (2026-02-07 17:35:18+00:00): Hello.
It makes no sense to just draw a circle on an undefined spot and name it as forest.
The tagging landuse= forest is sufficient.
Best regards
ivanbranco (2026-03-15 22:49:17+00:00): Ciao Stefano,

davvero questo salice si chiama "Rifugio Per Sosta"?
Dannyps (2026-06-11 07:30:16+00:00): De onde veio isto? Que tem a imagem a ver com esta rua?
topolusitania (2026-06-11 11:19:04+00:00): Foto do inicio da rua, tirada da Rua da Restauração
Dannyps (2026-06-11 16:21:22+00:00): Correto, tinha aberto o link errado, my bad. Ty
eggie (2026-02-07 10:39:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-07 10:41:02+00:00): Zet je zelf je opmerkingen op opgelost?

MVG,
eggie
juni_vv (2026-02-08 16:48:47+00:00): Hoihoi, deze bushalte heet "Rivierabad" en niet "Het Rivierabad".
Zie de lijnnetkaart:
https://www.ebs-ov.nl/index.php?eID=dumpFile&t=f&f=136630&token=5001da393241f1cd38bf35d577568f2eca077c84

Naam is weer aangepast :)
flex16 (2026-02-08 08:05:22+00:00): Du hast doch jetzt getagged, dass die Straße für landwirtschaftliche LKWs gesperrt ist. Das würde ja bedeuten, dass sie für PKW normal freigegeben ist. In diesem Fall wäre die Straße auf keinem Fall ein Track. Track ist erst, wenn die Straße für Kraftfahrzeuge aller Art ist gesperrt ist. VG
flex16 (2026-02-08 08:06:48+00:00): Und zumindest der Wege keinerlei Verbindungsfunktion für Kraftfahrzeuge hat.
flex16 (2026-02-08 08:07:15+00:00): *oder
flex16 (2026-02-08 08:14:36+00:00): habs wieder rückgängig gemacht...
m_fuhrmann (2026-02-08 08:34:38+00:00): Hat mir das traffic tool was falsches ausgespuckt?

Das hier steht da:
https://trafficsigns.osm-verkehrswende.org/DE?signs=DE:253,1026-36
m_fuhrmann (2026-02-08 08:40:09+00:00): "Das korrekte Tagging ist für Navigationssysteme wichtig, da highway=track beim normalen KFZ-Routen oft nicht berücksichtigt wird."

Ah!
flex16 (2026-02-08 09:19:37+00:00): Bei dem tagging tool, steht ja dass die Straße ggf. als track einzustufen ist. Hier nur eben nicht...