piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2024-10-09 01:46:38+00:00): Hi guillaume1, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 97% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 21 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=157650644
geh_ (2024-10-09 01:52:20+00:00): I confirm these deletions were intentional.
Frans S (2024-10-15 10:14:33+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You mapped quite a number of buildings as "heap" Why ?
Those objects are just buildings.
I retagged them
Best regards and keep mapping.
EKOTAMIKE (2024-10-15 14:49:30+00:00): Fran, I have no recollection of ever using that tag nor would I have used it at all. Must be some magic going on here. I'll keep an eye out for possible identity theft.
Taksine (2024-10-22 10:51:09+00:00): 城镇就用城镇，村庄就用村庄，礼和村你用城镇干嘛？
nevw (2024-10-09 05:21:00+00:00): Is this a hospital or a clinic?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhospital
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dclinic
tyfi (2024-10-09 02:45:27+00:00): Some segments of sidewalk were already mapped, and I just connected them up
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
tyfi (2024-10-09 03:15:15+00:00): Not sure what the standard naming convention is for these, but "Verizon" is the only sign visible from the road when driving past.
jmarchon (2024-10-09 21:58:59+00:00): Welcome back to OSM!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157652297
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
user_11609320 (2024-10-09 04:13:55+00:00): hey can somoene see what I did wrong. I was trying to correct this boundary now it doesn't show up. most of the forest boundaries in this area have the unclosed part error.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-26 08:41:50+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12237137577/history has shop = fast_food that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=fast_food ? Is it amenity=fast_food ? If not, what this tag is intended to mean? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfast_food
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:10:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-10-09 07:52:27+00:00): Ghi changeset comment đúng với action nhé em. Xóa biển báo thì ghi xóa biển báo. Thêm biển báo thì ghi thêm biển báo.
a16z (2024-10-09 08:25:58+00:00): dạ ok a
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
jleedev (2024-10-09 16:11:17+00:00): w364155655 was an "inner" way originally; at some point it became the sole member of a multipolygon so the validator presumed it should have been "outer".
Dark_Valor (2024-10-10 00:56:23+00:00): I did check that.  No, the area without natural wood but surrounded by that is what OSM Inspector said should be an outer.  That is part of the same relationship.  I wondered why that should be that way but no issue was created in OSM Inspector.  I did not map the area west-southeast of downtown.  I see issues with areas when I zoom using OSM Inspector.
Dark_Valor (2024-10-10 03:20:50+00:00): Oh, two areas actually exist to the west-southwest of downtown Pittsburgh (south of the Ohio River).  I switched to my laptop for this.  I used my phone for the other.
This relates to OSM Inspector if you might share some knowledge.  If the issue there is Ways (Context), what might be the typical issue with Context if it is not a duplicate segment?  I have that as an issue often.  I can understand if it should be outer or inner.
jleedev (2024-10-10 13:30:15+00:00): OSM Inspector describes "Way (context)
Member ways of defect multipolygons and closed ways with defects."

For instance, "ring not closed" appears as two pink dots, and all of the relation's ways are included for context. Screenshot: https://gist.github.com/jleedev/dc8cf80f624d83a6eb6402e809a6c77d
Dark_Valor (2024-10-10 21:16:07+00:00): That makes sense.  I should be good.  Thanks
bxl-forever (2024-10-09 07:35:25+00:00): Hello,

When a house number is correctly located within a building, its ref:UrbIS matches the id of the building.

But this is not the case here.  The official ref:UrbIS attached to Rue au Bois/Bosstraat 365B is 5041433, and that may not be changed.

Should there be an error in UrbIS, the best practice is to document the change through another tag.  Here is a standard tag I applied to several nodes (to make it easy to query them):
"note=Location established through a survey, despite UrbisAdm locates it in another building"

Hope this helps.
MarkpageBxl (2024-10-09 07:43:53+00:00): Alright, thanks for the feedback!
SHB2000 (2024-10-09 07:06:31+00:00): should clarify that I meant it is *not* a tourist railway in the typical sense
SekeRob (2024-10-09 07:03:54+00:00): Hi,

So the Santuaire Pelagos MP monster of 2300+ members still exists. At any rate, the island 2 hours after (you're an earlybird) mapper too,, with Ctrl+F5 continues to renter as sea in any zoom thru 1km. We'll know after tonight if in 2km zoom it's still the case, then we know more needs foxing. To me, a revert of the wildmeachael CS would have been appropriate with so many breaks in the outline and self intersections on the north side in OSMI area viewing.

Happy mapping.
user_177389 (2024-10-09 10:00:57+00:00): Hello,

I just repaired the coastline and involved relations this morning. Unfortunately, the first-time misrendering is quicker than a new render after a repair (the queue for coastline is different from normal edits).

I am in contact with wildmichael (in German): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157645436

There were conflicts during uploading last night, which caused most of the errors.

Best regards,
Mario
SekeRob (2024-10-09 14:18:13+00:00): Think the render cycle is up to 1km minutely "except" as you observe sea. These and the 2km zoom and further out like nightly. One of the insiders replied to me a while ago on the community forums as the 2km and up used to be weekly on Friday night.... so it's patience till like 04:00 CET also because OSMI only diagnoses in a 24 hour cycle to see if any other breaks need fixing.

When getting conflicts in JOSM, a) I run an update modified and b) usually choose the 'their version', accepting that the other mapper was quicker.

ciao
mavl (2024-10-09 09:19:06+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы второй день меняете этот перекрёсток. Напишите, пожалуйста, что вы хотите сделать? Каким источником вы пользуетесь?  Сейчас карта не соотвествует местности (например, проезд прямо из Черёмушек в Беркут возможен и никаких ограждений на пути нет; при движении на юго-восток поворот налево в Беркут выполняется с выделенной левой полосы по дополнительной секции светофора).
Luzandro (2024-10-11 10:42:24+00:00): Hallo,

das Umtaggen von highway=path auf highway=cycleway (oder auch umgekehrt) ist relativ sinnlos, solange bicycle+foot=designated gesetzt sind, siehe auch https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tagging-von-gemeinsamen-geh-und-radwegen/92982
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157655012
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-09 05:31:31+00:00): problem był zgłoszony w https://www.facebook.com/groups/osmpolska/posts/8602315419811832/
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-09 05:32:23+00:00): i polegał na ustawianiu access=permit tam gdzie potrzeba trudno dostępnego pozwolenia oraz na braku odpowiadania na komentarze w edycjach
woodpeck (2024-10-09 08:03:49+00:00): Dear Sunil Tewari, in this changeset you have deleted over 250 buildings from the map. Your changeset comment "#hotosm-project-17520 #OSMIndia #AndhraMapping24 #tt_event" is an inadequate explanation for such a deletion. Please explain why you deleted the buildings. Have they been destroyed? In that case, "removing buildings that were destroyed by <cause>" would have been an appropriate changeset comment. Please do not use hashtag-only changesets in the future - always make sure that there is at least some human-readable component there.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-09 05:31:16+00:00): wycofanie edycji 157590123;157590191;157590221;157590395;157590470;157590493;157590559;157590662;157591088;157591200;157591247;157591349;157591657;157623473;157623928;157624929;157625063;157625203;157625271;157625329;157625744;157625982;157626699;157626742;157627084;157627134

problem był zgłoszony w https://www.facebook.com/groups/osmpolska/posts/8602315419811832/
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-09 05:32:20+00:00): i polegał na ustawianiu access=permit tam gdzie potrzeba trudno dostępnego pozwolenia oraz na braku odpowiadania na komentarze w edycjach
eggie (2024-10-09 12:09:53+00:00): Dag KJ  Lijkt me oke zo. 
Groet
eggie
mcliquid (2024-10-09 07:46:46+00:00): fixed to tourism=information
mcliquid (2024-10-09 07:45:38+00:00): fixed to tourism=information
mcliquid (2024-10-09 07:45:48+00:00): fixed to tourism=information
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-10-09 07:55:51+00:00): Nguyên cái đoạn đường dài này ko cấm motorcar=destination đơn giản vậy đâu. Lựa chỗ nào ngay mà để thôi.
ⵣZiri_Atlasⵣ (2025-03-06 11:22:19+00:00): Hi,
Why do you remove the names written in Latin letters and replace them with Arabic names?
yamada-as (2025-06-09 08:52:52+00:00): Anyway, there are  3 official languages. The sign on that hospital is written only in two Arabic and French.

Locales speaks Algerian Arabic. Basically the name is actually an Arabic one originally just transliterated to latin.
yamada-as (2025-06-09 09:01:03+00:00): By the way, it is all depends on locales how they call it. As there is a mixture, some locals and structures called by Arabic  name and some other by the French one, but usually people use the old and original of the words. 

The exception is when gov change name and usually from French to Arabic or Amazigh. Those have conflicting naming between people on street and administrative document,
ⵣZiri_Atlasⵣ (2025-06-21 10:19:25+00:00): Well taken into account, thank you for your feedback.
Baloo Uriza (2024-10-10 14:54:39+00:00): Please refer to the wiki for use of phone and opening_hours tags.  The advertising copy in the description tag and changeset comment is inappropriate and unwelcome.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157656499
NeisBot (2024-10-09 06:59:44+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the name you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-09 16:39:38+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157656794
NeisBot (2024-10-09 07:00:24+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the name you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-09 16:39:03+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157665180
NeisBot (2024-10-09 07:00:05+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the name you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
aTarom (2024-10-09 07:26:09+00:00): Reporto al DWG
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-09 16:41:11+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157665470
silversurfer83 (2024-10-09 19:14:39+00:00): Hi :)

in diesem Fall ist es keine "building_passage" sondern die Eigenschaft "covered=yes" dürfte passender sein. Layer -1 kann bleiben, falls ein anderes OSM-Objekt darüber liegt. Wenn nicht, einfach nur "covered=yes" ohne layer

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157656880
Marabu_Too (2024-10-10 05:29:26+00:00): Ich hatte dies von dem Vordach der Tankstelle einige hundert Meter westlich übernommen. 
Ist dies aus OSM-Sicht etwas anderes?
silversurfer83 (2024-10-10 09:17:51+00:00): Ah. Gut, dass du das sagst. Dort ist es auch nicht korrekt 😄
silversurfer83 (2024-10-10 09:22:11+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-18 17:31:09+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157665470
ohmanger (2025-04-14 09:12:29+00:00): Hi, I'm not sure I agree - the officale_name tag can be used by itself and isn't necessarily a fallback tag like alt_name or similar.

The name of these overpasses suggest they're what would be used in official documents e.g. by the government highways department and are not colloquial names (try using "South 85-South 280 Connector Overcrossing" in a sentence :) ). In this case official_name is appropriate although there is also bridge:official_name, which I think might be more appropriate.
aTarom (2024-10-09 07:18:06+00:00): "carretera cocainomana"...
en serio?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12237295934/history
reporto DWG
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-18 17:30:51+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157662681
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-10-09 12:16:04+00:00): Leider immer noch keine Angabe der Quelle... :-(
lberges (2024-10-09 19:29:39+00:00): Hintergrund ist ein neues Projekt von Wambacher:
https://boundaries.wambachers-osm.website
Es zeigt Differenzen zwischen dem Ortsnamen, wie er in der Adresse angegeben ist, und den Namen der Gemeinde. Ziel des Projektes ist es, diese Differenzen zu prüfen, und entwader zu korrigieren, oder als zulässig zu markieren. Bei der Prüfung findet man gelegentlich unplausible PLZ-Grenzen, die kann man anpassen.
lberges (2024-10-09 19:31:00+00:00): Für die PLZ-Grenzen in Deutschland gibt es übrigens keine Quellen (oder kennst Du eine?) Die Grenzen können nur aus vorhandenen oder gefundenen Adressen hergeleitet werden.
streckenkundler (2024-10-10 06:31:16+00:00): Wonach prüfst du, ob die in OSM erfassten Adressdaten (auch Namen der Gemeinde!!!!) überhaupt korrekt und aktuell sind (nicht PLZ!)?? Die Grenze, die du in diesem CS verschoben hast, hattest du selbst mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135078117 Auch da fehlt eine Quelle, wonach du das damals erfasst hattest!
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-18 17:30:39+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157662587
ObscureAngel (2024-10-09 08:32:41+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre contribution :)

Après vérification dans l'outil Yohours (https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/) le format du champ est tout à fait valide.

Bonne journée et bonne cartographie :)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157657326
NeisBot (2024-10-09 06:59:09+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the name you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-09 16:40:19+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157662563
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-18 17:30:26+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157662530
os-emmer (2024-10-09 18:10:57+00:00): Hallo uboot,
danke für deine Überprüfung dieser Krankenwagenstation. Weißt du zufälliger weise, was emergency_service=land hier bedeutet? Der Tag ist nicht dokumentiert und kaum in verwendung. Weißt du, ob da eine Information drin versteckt ist?
uboot (2024-10-10 09:51:31+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe die Vermutung, dass es sich auf Ortsverband München-Land in Abgrenzung zu Stadt beziehen könnte. Vermutlich ist es nicht nötig.
Wurde von Der Harry eingefügt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120229924/history/4
Viele Grüße
Markus
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-18 17:30:13+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157661804
flohoff (2024-10-10 09:13:52+00:00): Moin,
wenn das für den autoverkehr gesperrt ist dann sollte da ein motor_vehicle=no drauf sein kein access=no - dann erspart man sich auch das bicycle=yes und foot=yes (Und es würde ja auch ein horse=yes etc fehlen)

Dazu würde ich da noch ein note:access drauf machen mit einer URL auf z.b. eine Presseveröffentlichung warum und seit wann das gesperrt ist.

Flo
powmapper (2024-10-11 14:38:46+00:00): Moin,
danke für den Hinweis. Da das Routing in unserem Einsatzleitsystem auf OSM beruht, war hier eine kurzfristige Änderung notwendig. Ich habe den Wert jetzt geändert. Die Rückmeldung der Sperrung habe ich über einen unserer Rettungswagen erhalten, daher kein Pressebericht oder ähnliches.
flohoff (2024-10-11 14:52:26+00:00): Aeh ja - das wäre schon wichtig das sowas "nicht einfach so" mal eingetragen wird. Das bleibt mitunter dann Jahrelang in der Datenbank.

Wir tragen sperrungen eigentlich erst ein wenn die mind. 3 Monate dauern weil die pipeline bis das bei den Nutzern ankommt eh schon länger ist als das. 

Und viele updaten nur einmal im Jahr. Dann ist das eh witzlos.

Ich mache da mal noch einen Note auf das das nochmal wer von den OSMern vor Ort überprüft und ggfs auch weiter tracked wann das wieder weg kann.

Flo
iso-lator (2025-05-11 17:09:16+00:00): Poprawiając linie autobusowe MZK Tomaszoiw Maz. natknąłem się na niepoprawne zmiany w liniach, skąd wzięte są te dane o przebiegu danych tras? Autobusy miały by jeżdzić ulicami, którymi ledwo mogły by się przecisnąć.
Jak by co to wprowadzam już korekty.
gscscnd (2024-10-12 09:28:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158439148
To nie jest budynek?
conradoos (2024-10-25 19:09:20+00:00): Cześć, zduplikowałeś drogi na rondzie - to jest prawdopodobnie błąd narzędzia, którego używasz, czyli osm-relatify
conradoos (2024-10-25 19:07:15+00:00): Cześć, zduplikowałeś drogi na rondzie - to jest prawdopodobnie błąd narzędzia, którego używasz, czyli osm-relatify
silversurfer83 (2024-10-09 19:12:13+00:00): Moin,

"gelöscht" ist kein hilfreicher Änderungssatzkommentar.
Außerdem: Wie sieht die Lokalität denn jetzt aus? Ist es eine leerstehende Apotheke? Ist etwas anderes dort?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157658306
Sir_Veyor (2024-10-10 08:01:52+00:00): Die Apotheke war aus irgendwelchen Gründen doppelt vorhanden. Deshalb habe ich einen Eintrag gelöscht. Der andere Eintrag ist noch vorhanden. D.h. da ist immer noch eine Apotheke.
silversurfer83 (2024-10-10 09:29:08+00:00): Alles klar. Danke für die Klärung
Leo Slager (2025-02-08 12:37:57+00:00): busroute 47 has been completed.
pittrichimica (2025-02-08 17:18:18+00:00): prima, bedankt!
nevw (2024-10-09 08:23:51+00:00): Why have you mapped a physio in a car park?
nevw (2024-10-09 08:26:15+00:00): I apologise for my haste…later imagery shows a newly constructed building here.
nevw (2024-10-09 09:47:44+00:00): I have mapped the three new buildings using Ersi imagery but the two buildings in the bottom right of the carpark seem to be still partially completed as does the carpark here. You may be able to complete that area if you are local to the area
Braybrook Physio (2024-10-09 10:13:34+00:00): Hi there Im not sure how to complete new building. The three building on left close to burke street is completed one year ago. Our physio clinic is the one in middle
nevw (2024-10-09 10:55:30+00:00): Ok, I mapped that as one building as only a low zoom image showing the building is available. The two buildings and the carpark that appear incomplete are on the corner of Ballarat and Butlers roads. It's fine to leave further mapping until more suitable imagery becomes available in the editor. Thanks for your help.
Rodrigo Rega (2024-10-10 00:01:56+00:00): He procedido a revertir este cambio (CC 157693113). Por las misma razón que la que se te informó en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153250668
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157659289
eggie (2024-10-09 08:33:50+00:00): Beste Johan... We mappen gewoon groundtruth.. Er staat hier geen bord max 20

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-10-09 08:40:14+00:00): Beste Johan.. Hoe kom je aan 20 km/u?

Ik heb de maxspeed verwijderd. Laat even weten wanneer hier een bordje is geplaatst. Dan draai ik het terug.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-10-09 08:29:24+00:00): Egor....   Door schuiven met de kaart heb je adresnode 	Zuiderstraat 342 ergens anders in Delft geplaatst.
Beter niet schuiven met de kaart over een groter gebied.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-10-09 08:32:41+00:00): Adres hersteld.

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=157659346
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-09 07:51:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12237358486

Pozdrawiam! 🦀