piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
infeeeee (2024-05-29 14:24:34+00:00): Szia!

A kilátóról miért vetted le a címkéket? 

Esetleg lehetne az éttermet esetleg külön pontként jelölni, ha valami ilyesmit akartál.
Jordán László (2024-05-29 15:31:04+00:00): Uhh, valami nagyon félrement. Nincs is étterem ott. Csak 1 új tag-et akartam hozzáadni. Mindjárt megpróbálom visszaállítani az eredetit.
Köszi az észrevételt!
felipeeugenio (2024-05-28 15:44:01+00:00): Hola. El Instituto Claret es dictinto de la Escuela Claret? porque está uno dentro del otro en OSM.
saludos
Ra_colate (2024-07-18 08:30:39+00:00): Hello ROLEX o,
I have fixed validation error between building & building intersecting for way 559047983
way 559047466
way 559045112
way 559045366
way 559045367
way 559046523
way 559046524
way 559057008
way 602225714
way 602225713
way 602225712
way 816570265
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
arcanma (2024-05-29 10:19:16+00:00): Modifiche controllate, tutto ok
gs3§zba (2024-07-09 04:57:48+00:00): Hallo aufachse, was war an der Wendestelle im Rebenweg falsch?
aufachse (2024-07-09 05:10:13+00:00): Es ist schlicht eine Vereinfachung (weniger Punkte, weniger Wege). Hat nichts mit falsch oder richtig zu tun.
gs3§zba (2024-07-09 16:45:43+00:00): Achso. Früher habe ich auch das eine oder andere vereinfacht. Das mache ich jetzt nicht mehr. Dagegen sprechen gute Gründe. Ich würde dich herzlich bitten, es auch zu lassen. Besonders nett wäre es, wenn du 'meine' Wendeplatte wieder herstellen würdest.
aufachse (2024-07-09 17:09:04+00:00): Welche guten Gründe sprechen denn in dem konkreten Fall dagegen?
gs3§zba (2024-07-10 14:39:38+00:00): Gegen die Vereinfachung dieser Wendefläche spricht konkret:
(1) OSM ist für einen hohen Detaillierungsgrad konzeptioniert. Wikipedia sagt: "Die Detailtiefe des Systems an sich ist theoretisch unbegrenzt."
(2) Man sollte grundsätzlich das Werk anderer Mapper respektieren und deshalb alles, was nicht wirklich falsch oder komplett überflüssig ist, so lassen, auch wenn es einem selbst nicht so gut gefällt.
(3) Es handelt sich hier in der Realität um eine unregelmäßige Fläche, die nicht passend mit dem Key:turning_circle beschrieben werden kann (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:turning_circle), noch weniger mit dem Key:diameter ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:diameter). Irgendwer könnte mal an der Größe und Form dieser Fläche interessiert sein.
(4) Später lassen sich mal Grundstückszufahrten, Fußwege und Ähnliches besser anbinden.
aufachse (2024-07-10 15:04:06+00:00): Danke für die ausführliche Antwort. Revert (mit genauerem Umriss hier) hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153788700
gs3§zba (2024-07-11 17:04:22+00:00): Die Schwäche dieses Mappings ist, dass es zurzeit keinen Konsens gibt, "wie Straßen (außer highway=pedestrian), die mit area=yes gekennzeichnet sind, interpretiert werden sollen" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:area#Straßenflächen). Deshalb hatte ich den highway ohne area=yes außen um die Fläche herumgezogen und für die Innenfläche zum Auffüllen für die Optik ein eigenes highway-Element mit area=yes eingepasst. Wegen der Darstellung von Linienobjekten in OSM bin ich absichtlich nicht auf die tatsächliche Grenzlinie gegangen. Da würde ich ja direkt dein vorhergehendes Mapping bevorzugen, wenn man die Wendeplatte dann noch als "hammer" (Key:turning_circle) definiert und schaut, ob man eine Größe hinzufügen kann, vielleicht doch per Key:diameter.
eggie (2024-05-28 16:00:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback Wat bedoel je met WEHh: Het Krat Svp geen persoonlijke informatie in OSM>.
De boom heb ik weer teruggezet. Het zijn schuingenomen luchtfoto's 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
arcanma (2024-05-29 10:25:27+00:00): Modifiche controllate, la forma dell'edificio modificato è sicuramente migliorata, potrebbe essere essere ancora più accurata considerando che va valutata a livello del terreno quindi il lato parallelo alla strada va bene ma il lato opposto dovrebbe ricadere un pochino all'interno dell'immagine del tetto. Sono comunque piccoli dettagli non molto significativi
infeeeee (2025-04-17 18:49:21+00:00): Szia!

A note=Closed-dal mit akartál jelölni? A bánya már bezárt, vagy a terület le van zárva az emberek előtt?

Ha az előbbi, akkor disused vagy abandoned prefixekkel kéne jelölni, ha az utóbbi akkor access=private

További jó térképezést!
arcanma (2024-05-29 10:36:33+00:00): Modifiche controllate.
Il doppio valore per crop è ambiguo, se fosse dovuto al cambio di coltivazione anno dopo anno è meglio non mettere nulla. Dalle quanto si vede dalle foto aeree potrebbero essere aree diverse, se possibile usare way distinte
ssundell (2024-09-14 14:46:16+00:00): Tuossa Lukonmäenkadulla menee nyt jalkakäytävä suoraan poikki yhden talon. Oliko tuo ihan tarkoituksellinen lisäys? 8)
liljaadeliina (2024-11-20 09:59:25+00:00): Hei, kiitos kun huomasit. Olin epähuomiossa jotenkin sen sinne lisännyt/laittanut. Poistin sen nyt, kiitos.
literan (2024-05-28 20:27:04+00:00): крайне плохо. Отрисовано по крыше (а надо рисовать по подошве здания). Соответственно, пересечений с заборами и дорогами не должно быть.
Flamen_Sru (2024-07-18 08:20:12+00:00): Hello collinsomwando I have fixed validation error between building & building crossing. Please inspect your task carefully before closing. Happy Mapping!
Swihail (2024-07-18 08:43:58+00:00): Hello ROLEX o,
I have fixed validation error between building & building intersecting for way 1055638884 & way 1055654708
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
Murrumbidgee (2024-07-18 08:24:59+00:00): Hello collinsomwando I have fixed validation error between building & building crossing. Please inspect your task carefully before closing. Happy Mapping!
O Fim (2024-08-29 16:08:40+00:00): parece que tirar edifícios importados de sua posição original e um esporte desses #maproulette
englu (2024-05-30 09:23:34+00:00): Jak wygląda drożność czerwonego szlaku pieszego na ul. Brzezińskiej: https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=214998&map=18.0/51.7324/19.645 ? Da się przejść? Na Stravie wygląda, że nie ma problemu: https://www.strava.com/maps/global-heatmap?sport=All&style=standard&terrain=false&labels=true&poi=true&gColor=hot&gOpacity=90#17/51.7324/19.645.
NicaTopo (2024-06-05 01:40:45+00:00): Hi guys,
These buildings are just garbage. They are huge, they don't match the satellite imagery at all.
kechan (2024-06-05 12:04:20+00:00): Hello NicaTopo,

I am on the same boat. When I did this changeset I was just trying to fix as many sharp angles as possible. But yeah, I completely agree with you, and the actual buildings should be put here instead.
user_7130456 (2024-06-02 09:33:40+00:00): 3000!
woodpeck (2024-05-28 15:36:20+00:00): In this changeset you deleted a large number of buildings which still seem to exist according to available aerial imagery. Your changeset comment gives absolutely no explanation for the deletion of over 100 buildings. Is this a mistake?
woodpeck (2024-05-28 16:52:29+00:00): Many buildings apparently re-drawn in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151952803 - please write better changeset comments so that people know what your intentions are.
NeisBot (2024-05-28 15:33:25+00:00): Hi Russieb, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1287426900

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
Russieb (2024-05-28 17:12:20+00:00): The sandbank, in it's smallest form, is visible on Bing Maps satellite imagery, Morning and evening it's at its largest, as you can see from the water. I can provide a photo next time I'm passing?
Russieb (2024-05-28 17:14:24+00:00): If you refer to Google maps satellite view, you can see small boats pushed up on the beach.
orthocircular (2024-05-30 04:40:14+00:00): Hi there, thanks for helping make OSM accurate!

Please be extra careful when editing around city limits and other big boundaries. It looks like you tried editing this bridge https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5496981 but ended up editing the Lebanon City Limits at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38414288

I've gone ahead and updated the bridge to what I think you intended. It's good to finally have names for these roads after so many years! Thanks again and happy mapping.
cnall (2024-05-30 13:18:37+00:00): Good morning! 

Thank you for catching that. It was just the road name that needed updating on the bridge, not the city limits. I'll definitely be extra cautious when working around boundaries. 

Thanks again!
olo81 (2024-06-08 17:29:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11939952523
Nie dodajemy miejsc, które nie istnieją w rzeczywistości. Granice oznacza się inaczej. Co tutaj się znajduje?
Yunkers (2024-06-13 17:08:54+00:00): Czy tu chodziło o dodanie granic czegoś? Napisz co to powinno być to doradzimy jak oznaczyć, na pewno nie tak.
olo81 (2024-06-17 23:51:14+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-28 16:46:21+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. #OMGuru
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151951357
Helium314 (2024-09-28 13:37:24+00:00): Hallo,
in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4452695 zweifelt ein Anonymous eine deiner Änderungen an.
Baloo Uriza (2024-05-28 23:36:04+00:00): Please use "Street" and not "St" in tag values.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151951877
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-28 16:00:25+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/192952955

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fischkopp0815 (2024-05-29 07:44:14+00:00): Woher kommt das addr:city=Brandmoor ? Nach meinem Wissen ist Brandmoor ein Wohnplatz, der zu Teilen in Hennstedt und Linden liegt , keine selbstständige Gemeinde. Ich halte addr:city =Hennstedt für die von dir bearbeiteten Häuser (wie es vorher war) für richtig.
lberges (2024-05-29 08:04:20+00:00): addr:city ist per Definition keine selbständige Gemeinde. Auch die Namen von Dörfern, Wohnplätzen etc. sind zugelassen. Beispiele aus Sch-H: Oland, Hollmühle, Sarkwitz, Oetjendorf, Sereetz.
lberges (2024-05-29 08:06:41+00:00): In diesem Fall hast Du allerdings recht, "Brandmoor" als Ortsangabe ist nicht mehr aktuell, d. h. wird praktisch nicht verwendet. Ich mach es rückgängig
mContext (2024-06-02 16:47:31+00:00): 请问你是从哪里得知这条路叫解放东路?
user_21579662 (2024-06-03 18:07:17+00:00): 路边的路牌上不是写的解放东路么
mContext (2024-06-05 02:12:54+00:00): 东合新苑附近路牌写的白竹坡路`
mContext (2024-06-05 03:40:05+00:00): 当然还有个小牌子  写个~泉坝路 禁止停车
user_21579662 (2024-06-06 03:41:12+00:00): 这条路名字挺乱的，最早的路牌上写的泉坝路，现在白竹坡路和解放东路都有混用
mContext (2024-06-06 06:08:32+00:00): 确实  昨天交警说这条路叫解放东路~
emersonveenstra (2024-06-20 12:30:08+00:00): Hi there,

You created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1287439089 which has no tags, could you please go back and tag it? Thanks!
ooosssay (2024-06-20 16:49:05+00:00): Thanks for reminding me to delete it! Thanks!
VA00 (2024-10-09 18:45:32+00:00): Tej ścieżki nie ma: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1287440837
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-28 16:36:47+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151953434
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-28 16:35:19+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151953441
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-28 16:44:29+00:00): The polygons are done beyond the building area. This should be done within the roof area. #OMGuru
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151953576
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-28 16:42:58+00:00): No street-level imagery is available. Two buildings are jointed together.  #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151953618
eggie (2024-05-28 18:23:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
mga_geo (2024-05-31 16:16:50+00:00): Bonjour,
Le rôle "bus_stop" est inconnu du schéma PTv2 il me semble ?
A35K (2024-05-28 17:48:46+00:00): Fußwege mit bicycle=yes werden nicht mit highway=cycleway kartiert. 

Hier ist eine gute Hilfestellung:
https://trafficsigns.osm-verkehrswende.org/
Bernardo7 (2024-05-29 13:19:48+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis!
Sanniu (2026-02-09 07:44:13+00:00): Hi, is it שדרות בית הלל or בית הלל?
Can you change all street parts to the same name and name:he?
mueschel (2024-05-30 12:52:13+00:00): Hi,
could you check this way, it got a strange tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1287449797
macdale (2024-05-30 13:09:17+00:00): Thanks for you comment. It's fixed.
nevw (2024-05-28 21:29:45+00:00): Welcome to osm.
leisure=pitch is the correct tag.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch
Also we don’t add a descriptive name to things.
nevw (2024-05-30 04:00:37+00:00): See our wiki for further info…including “name is for name only” section
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
NeisBot (2024-05-28 17:15:25+00:00): Hi Bhuwan_Bisht, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/node/11940175593

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
NeisBot (2024-05-28 17:40:13+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151956487
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-28 17:40:48+00:00): Please don't add non existing beaches. Thanks.
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-05 00:22:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152266030 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by user who added lots of fictional data
rskedgell (2024-05-28 19:37:31+00:00): Is this a new prohibition and if so, is there a link to an OSM-compatible source?

I realise that some of the Bing street side imagery is quite old, but I haven't been able to find any TSRGD diagram 951 (Riding of pedal cycles prohibited) signs at junctions along this section.

I see that The A12 Chelmsford to A120 Widening Development Consent Order 2024 (SI 2024 No. 60) implements a "prohibition of pedestrians, riding of pedal cycles, ridden or accompanied horses, horse drawn vehicles, agricultural motor vehicles and any motor cycle with an engine capacity of under 50cc." (This can probably be tagged with motorroad=yes rather than adding all the individual restrictions.)

I can't find anything similar for the A120 to Capel St Mary section, but I realise that I might not be looking in the right place.
Reb F (2024-05-28 22:43:57+00:00): The A120 to Capel is still accessible, just not the A12. The bridge and associated roundabout next to Capel that leads to the A120 is cycleable.

The bridge and slip round/roundabout should not have been amended.

Amendments were for A12 dual carriageway only.
wille (2024-05-28 19:10:05+00:00): oi, AjBelnuovo. Havia um endereço no edifício deletado que foi perdido.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151956132
AjBelnuovo (2024-05-28 19:15:23+00:00): O endereço não será o mesmo já que ali será construído um residencial.
literan (2024-05-28 20:23:17+00:00): некорректный тег
NieWnen (2024-05-30 21:25:12+00:00): Zmiana wycofana.
NieWnen (2024-05-30 21:26:37+00:00): To nie jest unclassified, to jest najwyżej
highway=service, service=driveway

Zmiana wycofana.
Dawid2849 (2024-05-28 19:44:37+00:00): ooo, już jest projekt drogi?
AndyB_66 (2024-05-28 20:27:38+00:00): Tak, tu masz PW: https://zdw-lublin.logintrade.net/zapytania_email,158590,5929d4f83ef0b1fad3dd9365bf2c00b4.html
Dawid2849 (2024-05-28 20:43:04+00:00): Ooo, dziękuję :)
Muszę poprawić geometrię DW835 od Markowicz do granicy... Minęło już blisko 2 lata od ukończenia przebudowy (ale ten czas leci), a Twoja obwodnica Tarnogrodu ma lepszą geometrię XD
hackthemap (2024-07-21 17:26:10+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contributions.
The convenience store you added in this changeset ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11940262191/history ) has addr:street=45, which is wrong. I changed it for you to be addr:housenumber=45 and addr:street=Rue de la Commune - Gemeentestraat to make the address valid. If that is wrong, please let me know or change the tags.
Happy mapping!
mikimapbuilder (2024-05-29 06:34:35+00:00): Removed descriptive name.
mcliquid (2024-05-29 07:19:28+00:00): Hallo, was meinst du mit "fixme=*"? Was soll der Stern bedeuten? Danke.
Punkte (2024-05-29 07:30:47+00:00): Der Stern ist ein Vermerk für mich das ich den Besagten Hydranten von der Kupplungsanzahl noch anpassen muss.
mikimapbuilder (2024-05-29 06:35:21+00:00): Removed descriptive name.
Глеб (2024-05-28 22:21:15+00:00): Вы не можете лепить автовокзалы где попало.
bxl-forever (2024-05-28 23:19:36+00:00): FYI, node 11583735334 is not in the middle of the road, like you think: if your only source is aerial imagery you will be mistaken because the bridge there hides the road underneath, where this address belongs.  I removed the fixme tag because there is nothing to "fix" here. ;-)
mikimapbuilder (2024-05-29 06:55:12+00:00): Hi! The building was modified to match satellite imagery.
ssundell (2024-06-05 21:58:47+00:00): Onko näihin teiden luokan nostoihin joku peruste? Lähtökohtaisestihan nämä ovat vastoin piirto-ohjeita (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fi:Suomi/Piirto-ohjeet), joten kiinnostaisi tietää, miksi tyyppiä nostetaan.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151958469
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-28 19:14:21+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151960008
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-28 19:15:01+00:00): Please don't add fictional data.
Thanks.
NicaTopo (2024-06-11 14:13:51+00:00): Hi Julie,

Please shape your buildings according to the satellite imagery. Your buildings are far too big.

Thank you.
Zainab Ramadhanis (2024-05-29 04:09:42+00:00): Thank you for your contribution! The mapping looks good. Keep up the great work and happy mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151959134
Zainab Ramadhanis (2024-05-29 04:09:38+00:00): Thank you for your contribution! The mapping looks good. Keep up the great work and happy mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151959159
Zainab Ramadhanis (2024-05-29 04:09:33+00:00): Thank you for your contribution! The mapping looks good. Keep up the great work and happy mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151959182
Zainab Ramadhanis (2024-05-29 04:09:27+00:00): Thank you for your contribution! The mapping looks good. Keep up the great work and happy mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151959196
Zainab Ramadhanis (2024-05-29 04:09:21+00:00): Thank you for your contribution! The mapping looks good. Keep up the great work and happy mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151959228
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-28 19:00:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002601351

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Zainab Ramadhanis (2024-05-29 04:09:15+00:00): Thank you for your contribution! The mapping looks good. Keep up the great work and happy mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151959246
bxl-forever (2024-05-28 19:32:24+00:00): Hello,
I wish there would be a nicer way to welcome you here but I must inform you that some of the edits you have been doing in the last hours are incorrect, and in most case even harmful for routing.
We had to redo some of your changes and even undo some of them.
Drawing sidewalks is not necessary in OSM.  For those who want to do this, it requires some experience with routing, to avoid common pitfalls like here.  Also, we discourage people from tracing in the iD online editor.
Can I please encourage you to spend a little more time learning about OSM or doing smaller contributions before engaging in sidewalk mapping in dense areas?
Thanks and have a nice day.
user_8655426 (2024-05-29 09:46:00+00:00): こんにちは。OpenStreetMap (OSM) へようこそ。
OSM は現実の世界に存在する地物をマッピングし、正確で最新の地図をつくっていくプロジェクトです。(real and current) また、OSMの地図データはゲームだけでなく、さまざまなアプリやウェブサイトなどで使用されています。

OSMに架空の地物を追加したり、既存のデータを実際とは異なるものに変更したりしないでください。よろしくお願いします。(事実と異なる不正な編集を行ったユーザーは、ブロックされる可能性があります。)

・「ようこそ！」
https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome

・JA:破壊行為
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:破壊行為

・Beware of fake beaches (Pokémon Go) (偽のビーチに注意してください。)
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/beware-of-fake-beaches-pokemon-go/112413

・新規マッパーに、コミュニティメンバーからお願いしたいこと
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2018/06/12/tips-pokemon-go-2/?lang=ja

---

・JA:初心者ガイド
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:初心者ガイド

・learnOSM (ビギナーズガイド)
https://learnosm.org/ja/beginner/

・JA:Map Features (地物)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Map_Features
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151959408
user_8655426 (2024-05-29 11:28:54+00:00): Reverted. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151984191
highflyer74 (2024-06-13 08:13:35+00:00): Hallo!

Danke für Deinen Beitrag! Bitte beachte, dass Namen in OSM nur für Objekte vergeben werden, die auch wirklich einen Namen haben. Beispielsweise hat eine Bank nicht den Namen "Sitzbank". Dass es sich um eine Bank handelt, ist bereit durch das entsprechende Attribut (in OSM Tag genannt) klar.

Danke, dass Du bei weiteren Bearbeitungen daran denkst :-)

Viele Grüße!
Crsi (2024-07-21 02:11:46+00:00): Hi AFL02, I fear there were some errors in the bus route 18. Maybe more are affected, but I have only verified it for 18 so far.
In particular, the last stop is not ordered correctly. The last stop should be Spöngin but is Lambhagavegur (Node 4354587264).
I will attempt fixing this.
Crsi (2024-07-21 02:24:40+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154201429 for my fix. I re-arranged the bus stops and routing according to their order of appearance. This is mandatory to make bus routing work properly.