piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-05-06 10:33:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150958078, 150958067 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by serial block evader.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16020 and e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150718330
willkmis (2024-04-19 16:52:01+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Quick question: did you mean to delete LaSorted Pizza or was that an accident?
BPTT (2024-04-18 20:16:52+00:00): Forgot to mention in my changeset comment: Cycleast is closed, but Flat Track Coffee is servicing bikes, so I changed the name and removed outdated business info.
Baloo Uriza (2024-06-18 13:47:38+00:00): I don't think you intended to remove the highway=* tag from Hinshaw Drive, but it looks like you did.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150193683
David Wheelock OKC GIS (2024-06-18 14:17:15+00:00): Thanks Baloo.  Sorry if I made an error.
Baloo Uriza (2024-06-18 19:53:18+00:00): I only randomly chanced across it and wasn't sure what exactly was happening but figured you did.
wielandb (2024-04-18 22:33:05+00:00): Hey :) 

Danke fürs Eintragen! 
Ich sehe, du hast einen Weg erstellt, der nur social_facility:for=* hat. social_facility:for=* ist ein sog. Sub-Tag, der auf jeden Fall noch den Haupttag amenity=social_facility braucht. Und auch der Tag social_facility=* wäre sehr hilfreich, um anzugeben was für eine Art von Einrichtung es ist. Bzw. wenn du natürlich noch weitere Sachen über diese Einrichtung weißt wie z.B. den Namen, scheue dich nicht, sie einzutragen! :)
rskedgell (2024-04-19 05:57:05+00:00): Thanks for updating this.

It's probably worth keeping the tracktype=grade2 tag where it's been mapped, even where it isn't a highway=track. It potentially gives useful information to routing software.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype

If you're updating public rights of way in your area, you might find this resource useful:
https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/progress/bucks/-/downley/
Blisco (2024-04-22 10:02:28+00:00): I was actually correcting my own error here: in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150128781 I accidentally changed the entire way across the common from highway=footway to highway=track with tracktype=grade2, when I meant to change only the short southern section. I should have made that clearer in the comment.

That looks like a useful resource, thanks!
michael60634 (2024-05-01 01:34:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in full as it is vandalism.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150193916
aceman444 (2024-05-18 17:14:49+00:00): Zdravim, existuje jeste toto hriste? Pred rokem tam nebylo.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-18 21:00:19+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4740113031
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203547104

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
wielandb (2024-04-18 22:27:41+00:00): Hey, those CS bounding boxes are pretty large. Did you really survey all this information? Did you maybe make a mistake by accident?
terfuc (2024-04-19 08:01:19+00:00): I visited these places last week:
Böhlen
Wroclaw
Solec-Zdroj
Nowy Korczyn
Zukowice
Noman Bin Hossain (2024-04-18 21:01:33+00:00): good
nevw (2024-04-20 07:40:48+00:00): Please zoom in closer to map the building shapes more accurately. When the building is selected you press Q or select the square icon to give the building right angular corners. I noticed one building with name=Norman. Please do not put personal details such as your name on osm. The name tag is meant for things that really do have a name.
nevw (2024-04-20 07:44:17+00:00): I also noticed a source “streetlevel imagery”. Be aware that we are not permitted to use Google street level imagery but other sources are likely fine
nevw (2024-04-21 08:06:41+00:00): Oops, misread name... is Nomans
maraf24 (2024-04-18 22:05:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136081857
To podobna sytuacja jak wjazd na rodno, więc nie powinno tu być _link.
Marek-M (2024-04-19 08:21:01+00:00): Poprawiłem to skrzyżowanie w CS https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=150210258

Było tam nieźle nakombinowane z podziałami dróg i geometrią. Teraz chyba jest bardziej prawidłowo.
eggie (2024-04-19 05:26:49+00:00): Dag jlinderhof..
Je verwijdert op meerdere plaatsen de landuse en vervangt deze door een wijk.
Dat is allemaal niet correct.
Svp de landuse terugzetten.
Een wijk zet je op een aparte node.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2024-04-19 07:56:01+00:00): De landuse heb ik hier weer hersteld. 
Wat is nu precies je bedoeling?

MVG
eggie
A67-A67 (2024-04-18 21:22:45+00:00): Hoi,
Je voert de wijknaam hier in op een grasveld en verandert daarna het grasveld naar een wijk.

De correctie manier is om een nieuw punt aan te maken en dat te taggen met place=quarter en name=Hagenbroek.
A67-A67 (2024-04-18 21:40:51+00:00): Ik heb de grasvelden in Kampen teruggezet en punten voor de wijken toegevoegd, zoals https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11829271368
rskedgell (2025-09-18 19:03:11+00:00): Hi @Intrigued and thanks for adding these new weight restrictions.

I've changed these to maxweightrating:hgv=7.5, as the weight restriction in the traffic order and corresponding signs is for "goods vehicles having a maximum gross weight of over 7.5 tonnes" and all goods vehicles ≥ 3.5t are HGVs.

There's been some ambiguity in the past over how to tag weight restrictions in the UK and tagging schemes have evolved over time, but hopefully the wiki now reflects the current position.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172128787
Intrigued (2025-09-19 09:34:09+00:00): Thank you very much @rskedgell for the correction.
rskedgell (2024-04-19 05:48:46+00:00): Many thanks for adding these. I find these very useful for planning running and walking routes.

When you add separate sidewalks, would you mind updating the sidewalk tagging on the parent street? It potentially gives a hint to routing software and also makes it easier to query OSM for the extent of sidewalk mapping.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk#Separately_mapped_sidewalks

I've updated the tagging for these new sidewalks in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150203590
VLD062 (2024-04-19 15:21:17+00:00): Hello rskedgell, thank you for your feedback. After uploading the initial changesets, I realized that I had to update the parent street as well and made the necessary corrections before seeing your comment. I went back and added the relevant tag updates to the parent streets for as many sidewalks as possible based on my recollection. If you notice any that I might have missed, please do let me know. Thank you again for your input!
CJJ2501 (2024-04-20 13:32:51+00:00): Hi Grant!

Some very nice improvements in this changeset!

A lot of the shops that are mapped here all are super out of date (mapped about 15 years ago). Luckily Woodlands Boulevard has a very nice mall map: https://woodlandsboulevard.co.za/mall-map#/

It's on my to-do list to update the map here, feel free to join in (if you're into mapping points of interest).

Cheers,
Chris
CJJ2501 (2024-04-20 13:34:13+00:00): (Looking at the current shops on the map is a little like going into a time-machine, I grew up in this area at this time)
Grant_Smith (2024-05-04 11:35:42+00:00): Thanks Chris!
Yeah looking at the shops now I do see a lot of them are ancient, I might update them if a get a chance.

I am also aware they are busy adding 2 new take-away spots in the parking lot near the McDonald's - however, I am not sure when that will be finalized, so also something to look out for in the future.
A67-A67 (2024-04-18 22:00:10+00:00): Ik heb het grasveld hersteld. De wijk Greente is al op de juiste manier toegevoegd op een apart punt.
robby_rumble (2024-04-24 11:54:13+00:00): Hi Nick, interested to learn more about this changeset as well. Are the "Bicycles must be walked" signs no longer physically present?
nickvet419 (2024-04-25 00:05:23+00:00): there are designated locations along the riverwalk where bikes must be walked, but otherwise bikes are permitted though most of it.
robby_rumble (2024-04-25 19:23:46+00:00): Hi Nick, I just conducted a survey and verified that there are permanent metal signs posted at every entrance to the riverwalk stating "Bicycles must be walked." I also spoke with a private security contractor who confirmed that bicycles are to be dismounted and walked through the riverwalk.

Can you please revert your changes and/or set the riverwalk paths to bicycle=dismount? Thanks so much.

Robby
nickvet419 (2024-04-25 19:43:59+00:00): The information I have is directly from the city of Chicago.
robby_rumble (2024-04-25 19:46:32+00:00): Can you please share that information with me?
robby_rumble (2024-04-25 20:34:50+00:00): I do acknowledge that there is inconsistent information online regarding the bicycle policy. I did go down there and try to ride my bike today and a security guard flagged me down and told me to dismount and walk. For this reason I'm not sure bicycle=yes is the appropriate OSM tag.
nickvet419 (2024-04-25 22:40:49+00:00): The security guards will tell you to dismount during high traffic hours. That information is on the FAQ https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/sites/chicagoriverwalk/home/faq.html
The alderman a few years ago tried to pass legislation banning bikes on the riverwalk, but that legislation failed. He also posted the signs seen at the entrances, but those signs are not legally binding as the riverwalk is a designated off-street bike route by the city and are marked as such on all official Chicago Bike maps.  There are also additional yellow signs posted along the riverwalk in which the FAQ refers to, one is posted at the Marketplace section that says "Yield to pedestrians, please dismount.  seen in this video at 11:55 https://youtu.be/bFSKev6vCGI?si=Dr_WyUQVhQTkRS10
nickvet419 (2024-04-25 22:52:27+00:00): I changed access to permissive.
robby_rumble (2024-04-26 15:42:59+00:00): Thanks Nick, that makes sense to me. Appreciate you talking it through.
A67-A67 (2024-04-18 21:55:55+00:00): Hoi,
Je verwijderd hier de speeltuin en verandert deze in een buurt.

Om een buurt toe te voegen, moet je een nieuw punt aanmaken en daarvan een buurt maken, niet een bestaand object veranderen in een buurt.
woodpeck (2024-04-18 22:44:49+00:00): In this changeset you deleted a large number of objects that, according to aerial imagery, still exist - see https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=150196477 which shows the deleted objects in red. Was this intentional? Have these objects (soccer pitches, streets, residential areas...) been demolished?
DressyPear4 (2024-04-19 03:07:55+00:00): Revertido!
Não faça testes ou delete objetos reais existentes no mapa.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150196477
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-19 04:22:48+00:00): Please map features as they are.  Parking aisles should be mapped as parking aisles, and NOT cartpaths.  I have gone through and corrected this error for you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150196834
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-19 04:23:13+00:00): Actually, changeset reverted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150196834
MorahT (2024-04-19 10:10:56+00:00): The footpath at location 51.660259, -1.926600 into Cotswold Hoburne was footbridge over the stream.  Is this is now a tunnel?
citrula (2024-04-19 05:00:02+00:00): attribution=* is for providing credit to the source of the data - maybe you can explain what you are trying to convey with attribute=pizza and I can help you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150199506
ivanbranco (2025-04-07 17:16:52+00:00): Hi Pan, this conflation left the type=multipolygon on the building ways. But this tag is expected on relations only. Could you check them out?

Thanks and good mapping
Pan (2025-04-07 20:59:20+00:00): Hi. Thanks for bringing this up and sorry for the mistake. I think it is fixed now. It was most likely a copy and paste error.

Nice day to you and good mapping.
German C (2024-04-19 16:32:08+00:00): Hola leomer810902, bienvenido a openstreetmap, podria revisar esta via www.openstreetmap.org/way/1273968997 al parecer debería ser un área, gracias
citrula (2024-04-19 05:34:42+00:00): You marked La Verde Park as a national park in this edit. I changed it to a normal park.
MxxCon (2024-04-20 02:51:42+00:00): Hello.
For the Queens District Attorney's Office you added "addr:unit=1-YAI". This value looks rather strange. Is that accurate?
Also, you added a couple of POI phone numbers, but neglected to include + in front of the country dialing code. The + is mandatory, otherwise it's an invalid phone number format.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150200147
JohanGallant (2024-04-21 23:37:44+00:00): Yes, I will have to add the country code to the numbers. It does appear that the DA office is located in the first floor YAI multiservice center room but I can remove the tag if it causes confusion.
JohanGallant (2024-04-21 23:42:40+00:00): Changes can be seen here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150321868#map=19/40.71368/-73.83117
German C (2024-04-19 16:27:41+00:00): Hola leomer810902, bienvenido a openstreetmap, estaba revisando estos nodos a los cuales le faltan etiquetas , www.openstreetmap.org/node/11829559381 ,
www.openstreetmap.org/node/11829559378 ,
www.openstreetmap.org/node/11829559379 ,
www.openstreetmap.org/node/11829559372 ,
www.openstreetmap.org/node/11829557454 ,
www.openstreetmap.org/node/11829557453 ,
www.openstreetmap.org/node/11829557452 ,
www.openstreetmap.org/node/11829557451 ,
www.openstreetmap.org/node/11829557450 ,
y estaba revisando tambien esta vía www.openstreetmap.org/way/1273970925 la cual parece que debería ser un área de una casa, podrías revisar por favor esos nodos y la via, gracias. Posdata: en este link wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear_en_Colombia se encuentra una guía para mapear.
Archais (2024-06-21 19:02:37+00:00): Reservoir polygon geometry appears to be broken. gdal.VectorTranslate (ogr2ogr) fails to make valid.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-21 00:14:58+00:00): a few of the ways were wrong direction. fixed
fortera_au (2024-04-29 23:25:27+00:00): Hi, not only is this tagged incorrectly, but this road doesn't exist on the aerial imagery you're claiming to have used, or newer imagery. Can you confirm how you know this road exists?
DD1GJ (2024-04-19 06:06:13+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM und danke fürs Mitmachen. Ich habe den Eintrag wieder gelöscht, da der Spielplatz bereits als Fläche vorhanden war: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246603568

Weitere Informationen zu OSM findest Du u.a. im Tutorial: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
kimo (2024-06-08 04:00:38+00:00): Off Canterbury road you've added some driveways which have been incorrectly tagged as residential roads. Can you review the added roads, and change them to driveways where appropriate?
CaptainCap (2024-06-09 22:39:59+00:00): Hi Kimo, thanks for the heads up. I was following some pre-existing classifications on that road and was torn between calling it residential or driveway. I just pushed an edit with fixes along Canterbury and I'll look at my past edits to clear out any additional mistakes. Thanks again for the help and for helping with the Heathmont area!
fortera_au (2024-04-29 23:27:22+00:00): Hi, as per another changeset comment, this road doesn't appear on the aerial imagery you've claimed to use, and is tagged incorrectly. Can you please confirm how you know this road exists?
flohoff (2024-04-19 10:10:30+00:00): Moin,
ich hab gesehen das du hier ganz viel mit "landuse=grass" taggst. 

Hast du den absatz im wiki darüber gelesen das landuse=grass zu nahezu 100% falsch ist?

landuse=grass ist kein wirklicher landuse sondern ein unfall der geschichte. 

Dazu kommt das du an verschiedenen stellen landuse in landuse gemacht hast - überlappend ohne multipolygon extension - Das führt zu semantischen fehlern.

Wenn man grasoberflächen taggen möchte wäre da eher landcover=grass richtig.

Ich berechne dafür eine QA Karte für Landuse overlaps (Ein quadratmeter kann nur _einen_ landuse haben)

https://osm.zz.de/dbview/?db=landuseoverlap-owl&layer=overlap#51.73362,8.80091,14z

Flo
TAltemeier (2024-04-19 10:31:15+00:00): Moin Flo, 

man ich glaube wir hatten über 10 Jahre keinen Kontakt :-90 Schön das es dich noch gibt. 

Das Polygon hatte bereits ein Landuse, daher kam es zu überlappungen. Ich habe das an den Stellen korrigiert an denen ich die Änderungen vollzogen habe. landcover=grass ist auch gesetzt!
TAltemeier (2024-04-19 11:04:49+00:00): Probleme behoben :-) Danke für den Hinweis
flohoff (2024-04-19 10:06:32+00:00): Moin,
ich habe den changeset gesehen - Cool das du mit mappst. 

2-3 kleinigkeiten - Also - der Rastplatz wird ja nicht "in der mitte des weges" sein - so ist der aber gerade eingezeichnet. Der wird ja eher rechts oder links des weges liegen. Sowas als node in einen way zu packen bedeutet ja das es "in der mitte des weges ist"

Dann das "name" tag - In das "name" tag kommen nur Eigennamen - keine beschreibungen - also sowas wie "Konrad-Adenauer Rastplatz" oder "Gesine Schwan Bach" - Beschreibendes kannst du in "description" ablegen, aber eigentlich ist das hier gar nicht nötig denn mit dem "rest_area" ist eigentlich alles gesagt.

Bei der rest_area bin ich mir nicht sicher ob das Sinn macht. Ich glaube normalerweise versteht man da einen Autobahn rastplatz drunter.

Ich würde eher die Features wie z.b. eine Bank/Tisch/Pavillion etc als tags eintragen.

Sowas:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpicnic_table

So long

Flo
ChrisAir86 (2024-04-19 11:32:19+00:00): Hallo Flo,

danke für dein Kommentar. Ich habe den Bereich angepasst. 

Gru0
HellMap (2024-04-20 14:19:58+00:00): Sveiki!

Lūgums ņemt vērā, ka parastiem meža ceļiem nosaukumu visticamāk gandrīz nekur nebūs un tāds nosaukums kā "Trase" ir apraksts, kuru nosaukumā nelieto. Norādot ceļa veidu arī tiek saprasti, kas tas ir.

Un seguma vērtībām jābūt kādai no standarta OSM vērtībām, kas ir balstītas uz angļu valodu, piemēram `ground`, `asphalt` utt. Latviešu valodā šādas vērtības nebūs izmantojamas.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface

Vēl piebildīšu ka dubļi (kas būtu identiski `mud` vērtībai) parasti Latvijā ir reti, tikai kaut kādos purvos, un parasti sezonāli neizbraucami ceļi pēc ziemas ir vienkārši zeme. Protams, ja te kaut kāda moto/kvadrociklu trase, tad tiešām var būt vissezonāli dubļi mitrā vietā.

Šajās izmaiņās šis jau ir izlabots (izņemot par dubļiem).

Paldies
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-25 08:12:47+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175969143/history has amenity = church that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by amenity=church? It seem to be not documented value and it seems to be a duplicate of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship - if you meant christian church then then it is taggable by amenity=place_of_worship religion=christian.

If you used it intentionally instead of amenity=place_of_worship - then what is the difference here?
Vinber-Pro (2024-05-22 05:43:30+00:00): Bonjour,
cela fait un peu trop de Bâtiment C, tous sont les Bâtiments C ?

à plus
julcnx (2024-04-22 12:51:56+00:00): reverted change as bridge is not legally prohibited for motorcars. Please be careful regarding the usage of legal access tags.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150345602
BATTLEBOTS_BOI (2024-04-19 12:35:53+00:00): The entirety of Larchmont is part of the Town of Mamaroneck.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-04-19 12:41:08+00:00): I have seen that on https://gis.ny.gov/civil-boundaries/ but there is also part of Mamaroneck that needs to be added to that relation, and  the third part is that Tiger data is showing different polygon so since it was not clear what is final solution, I have just fixed the broken boundaries in a way  it is functional. Please if you have the knowledge of how this relation should look like fix the members of the existing relation.

Sorry if this caused some trouble on your side, but there was broken relation so I made correction just to make it functional.
M!dgard (2024-04-19 08:06:15+00:00): .osc created with a custom script to allow modifications only to a given set of tags, uploaded with JOSM
M!dgard (2024-04-19 08:08:33+00:00): These nodes were created with the faulty editing software, have not been touched in this restoration CS, and should be checked manually:

https://osm.org/node/11813722199

https://osm.org/node/11813719303

https://osm.org/node/11813732431

https://osm.org/node/11813732156

https://osm.org/node/11813727133

https://osm.org/node/11813694491

https://osm.org/node/11813665809

https://osm.org/node/11813721623

https://osm.org/node/11813654138
M!dgard (2024-04-19 08:10:49+00:00): These nodes have seen later modifications, after an edit with the faulty software, may not have been touched in this restoration CS, and should be checked manually:

https://osm.org/node/3066426958

https://osm.org/node/971993302

https://osm.org/node/6611828862

https://osm.org/node/6007415918

https://osm.org/node/10221156114

https://osm.org/node/5408200703

https://osm.org/node/5904851101

https://osm.org/node/5904851100

https://osm.org/node/4936571418

https://osm.org/node/6032229212

https://osm.org/node/6008284570

https://osm.org/node/4155385489

https://osm.org/node/7832183189

https://osm.org/node/971995744

https://osm.org/node/4155385489

https://osm.org/node/3066423949

https://osm.org/node/3968626844

https://osm.org/node/6376227687

https://osm.org/node/11457556282

https://osm.org/node/7832398163

https://osm.org/node/1528203264

https://osm.org/node/11457533012

https://osm.org/node/5904903459'
M!dgard (2024-04-19 08:59:13+00:00): The script to generate these changes can be found here:

https://git.sr.ht/~midgard/osm-selective-revert
bxl-forever (2024-04-19 10:46:39+00:00): Good job!  Many thanks for this.
infeeeee (2024-04-19 08:32:11+00:00): Visszavonva.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150211061
flohoff (2024-04-19 09:58:48+00:00): Moin,
das hier halte ich für falsch. Der schnipsel ist komplett auf NRW gebiet und da hat die Straße laut ALKIS definitiv den Namen oder wie kommst du da drauf?

Flo
marcusberner (2024-04-19 10:45:25+00:00): Hallo Flo,

der Schnipsel liegt im Gebiet der Stadt Minden (NRW). Die Bezeichnung "Schaumburger Straße" gehört zur Stadt Bückeburg, Landkreis Schaumburg, Niedersachsen und endet an der Landesgrenze. Ab NRW ist dieses Stück namenlos und mündet weiter nordwestlich an der Kreuzung in den Schaumburger Weg, Stadt Minden, Kreis Minden-Lübbecke (NRW). Kannst du im Geoportal des Kreises Minden-Lübbecke unter https://www.minden-luebbecke.de/Service/GEOportal/ (dort auf "Alle Themen" klicken) recherchieren.
marcusberner (2024-04-19 10:46:56+00:00): Die Straße "Schaumburger Straße" in Minden ist nicht existent!
flohoff (2024-04-19 09:53:31+00:00): Moin,
warum hast du hier den namen entfernt? Wegen der Landesgrenze? Bist du sicher das der name da wirklich endet? 

Und wenn da so ist sollte auf die Straßen auch ein "noname=yes" ansonsten kommt das in jedem validator als fehler hoch.

Flo