piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MacLondon (2025-09-21 22:37:06+00:00): Thanks. I've now renamed it to Tanner Lane.
user_5359 (2025-08-11 07:11:22+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1391526404. 
A roof with a house number (but no street name), really? And then with a different value (101) than the house it presumably belongs to (110). Something can't be right here.
Pontificator Extraordinaire (2025-08-30 17:02:23+00:00): Just a heads up, using the name=* tag is discouraged if an object doesn't have an official name, and definitely shouldn't be used to indicate that it belongs to another object.

By being contained within a golf course area, it's already implied that those features belong to that golf course. Here, naming them is not only redundant, it obscures the ref=* tag from being rendered.
Gregory Peony (2025-08-27 23:54:18+00:00): I resolved the tagging in Changeset: 171108062 Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170270402
rudiejd (2025-08-11 11:44:00+00:00): This changeset is incomplete because I'm getting rate limited when uploading the ways for each neighborhood. I reached out to the Data working group.
Gregory Peony (2025-08-27 22:51:46+00:00): Buildings can be round too. Complete the ID editor walkthrough before contributing further, if you haven't already. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170270798
Gregory Peony (2025-08-27 22:45:29+00:00): Hi, you spotted buildings in the imagery (and even one obscured by clouds), but could have mapped them more accurately. 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the roofs of buildings, but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

After mapping buildings, please remember to square their corners. Most buildings have square corners because that's easy to build. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that the corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, use the `Q` key to square the corners. This [video about squaring features](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a guide.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Gregory Peony (2025-08-27 23:25:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Looks like you're took care to map footpritns accurately here; I recommend mapping them slightly smaller since roofs tend to overhang walls.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the roofs of buildings, but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.


Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Gregory Peony (2025-08-27 23:27:30+00:00): Southern footprint is good, northern is oversized and although the roof is slightly curved the building is likely square. 

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170271234
Gregory Peony (2025-08-27 22:55:15+00:00): I flagged some footprints that envelope multiple buildings. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170271268
Gregory Peony (2025-08-27 23:32:30+00:00): You duplicated data when adding these footprints, because you mapped on top of already existing footprints. It looks like you mapped outside your task boundary which led to a conflict with another contributor. 

Modify existing data when you can tell which feature it represents, and delete features which you are certain no longer exist.

Please do not snap the corners of the buildings to other buildings or features such as roads and paths. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to keep nodes from snapping to other objects and accidentally connecting. This [video about connected nodes](https://youtu.be/ltn1VOiq5_0) has more information and a guide.

 Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170271278
Gregory Peony (2025-08-27 23:55:56+00:00): I resolved the overlapping and duplicated data with https://osmcha.org/changesets/171107943
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170271278
Baloo Uriza (2025-08-11 14:33:33+00:00): Parkling lot should probably be operator=Farwest access=private instead.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170271320
PdxKicker (2025-08-19 12:55:20+00:00): Change set 170271320 isn't operated by Farwest anymore. It's owned by the port and a different company uses the area. I haven't been able to find out if the area is one company or multiple.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170271320
PdxKicker (2025-08-19 12:55:25+00:00): Change set 170271320 isn't operated by Farwest anymore. It's owned by the port and a different company uses the area. I haven't been able to find out if the area is one company or multiple.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170271320
PdxKicker (2025-08-19 12:55:26+00:00): Change set 170271320 isn't operated by Farwest anymore. It's owned by the port and a different company uses the area. I haven't been able to find out if the area is one company or multiple.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170271320
PdxKicker (2025-08-19 12:55:42+00:00): Change set 170271320 isn't operated by Farwest anymore. It's owned by the port and a different company uses the area. I haven't been able to find out if the area is one company or multiple.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170271320
PdxKicker (2025-08-19 12:57:17+00:00): I am using mobile and didn't know if the comment went through or not. Sorry for multiple messages.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170271320
Gregory Peony (2025-08-27 22:33:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You have enveloped multiple buildings in onw footprint; each footprint should represent one building. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170271385
Gregory Peony (2025-08-27 23:00:03+00:00): Please do not snap the corners of the buildings to other buildings or features such as roads and paths. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to keep nodes from snapping to other objects and accidentally connecting. This [video about connected nodes](https://youtu.be/ltn1VOiq5_0) has more information and a guide. 

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170271473
trigpoint (2025-11-22 20:05:20+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175003574
trigpoint (2025-11-22 20:05:13+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175003574
Gregory Peony (2025-08-27 23:06:15+00:00): Generally you appear to be identifying buildings in imagery thoguht you are not mapping them as accurately as possible. 

Beware that there is a difference between building footprints and residential areas which tend to envelope them. Check here for details of tags you do not understand https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features. Residential areas and buildings should not share common/grey nodes.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170272216
Kovoschiz (2025-08-11 18:03:23+00:00): 1. Please use meaningful upload comments summarizing your edit 
2. As mentioned before, please split to `disused=yes` / `abandoned:highway=` instead of deleting
Taya_S (2025-08-17 10:18:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139
Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18623

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170558479
残阳逐流 (2025-08-23 16:02:12+00:00): 日照—凤县公路不就是342国道吗，这能有什么好改的（
osmviborg (2025-08-11 06:24:19+00:00): The PtX plant is defined by an area https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1229605506
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-23 06:21:08+00:00): DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173657043
silversurfer83 (2025-08-11 08:09:25+00:00): Hi :)

mit access=yes lässt du dort explizit alle Verkehrsmittel zu. Weiß nicht, ob das so gewollt ist. Ggf. nimmst du das wieder raus und lässt die Router anhand "Feld/Waldweg" und Oberfläche entscheiden, wen sie dort entlang schicken.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170274208
sillywalks (2025-08-11 09:05:46+00:00): Vor Ort habe ich keine einschränkende Beschilderung gesehen, am Ende des Weges (am Waldrand) passbefindet sich ein Gartentor in der Hecke.
Dimitar155 (2025-08-13 05:31:19+00:00): re:note/4112307

Пейката от доста време си е там. Електронните табла ги демонтират временно, когато имат някаква повреда.
rempshaener (2025-08-11 08:03:39+00:00): Hallo,

bitte mache dich mit dem Prinzip des Lebenszyklus-Präfix vertraut.
Auf allen Luftbilders - auch den vDOP - ist das Gelände im Ursprungszustand noch erkennbar.
So besteht immer die Möglichkeit, dass der nächste Mapper alles wieder neu erfasst. 

Viele Grüße
RobotFK (2025-08-11 08:57:58+00:00): Hallo  rempshaener,

Wie im Änderungssatz markiert ist die Änderung durch einer vor Ort besichtigung begründet. Da vorher die Ruinen noch existierten hatten die Gebäude auch vorher noch das Korrekte prefix.

Mit dem wegfallen dieser Ruinen und dem Dogma "Map what's on the ground" habe ich die Karte der Realität und nicht den (natürlich veralteten) Luftbildern angepasst.

Ich hoffe das hier reicht als begründung.

Trozdem danke für den Kommentar,
RobotFK
rempshaener (2025-08-11 10:09:38+00:00): Hallo,

gerade erst abgerissene Gebäude werden üblicherweise nicht gelöscht, sondern mit dem razed-Präfix versehen.
Das von dir praktizierte Löschen hat nur Nachteile:
- Andere ("Sessel"-)Mapper könnten die Objekte erneut eintragen.
- Relevante Tags, die mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit weiterhin benötigt werden (hier: die Adresse), gehen verloren. 

Viele Grüße
RobotFK (2025-08-11 14:42:36+00:00): Okay, ich werde hierdraus lernen und wir können die gebäude gerne wieder herstellen, zumindest bis ein Luftbild diese nicht mehr führt
rempshaener (2025-08-11 15:39:32+00:00): Nee, nicht nötig, war eher als Tipp für das nächste Mal gemeint. Zur Zeit wird in der Ecke ja viel abgerissen und neu gebaut.

Viele Grüße
mikedld (2025-08-11 22:44:13+00:00): Starbucks seems to be a duplicate, did you maybe mean to move https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12619018789 to the right place instead?
Osmwithspace (2025-08-21 13:20:19+00:00): You are right, seems to be a duplication. But I can not verify it on site.
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-17 02:30:45+00:00): Please don't abbreviate in refs, for the same reason we don't abbreviate in names.  Would you mind taking another shot at this or rolling it back?  Especially where it's ambiguous, since there's bound to be a numbered route with a busway somewhere.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-12-17 07:33:05+00:00): I thought that the convention was to abbreviate modifiers like Business. Since these are `ref` tags and not `name` tags, abbreviations should be allowed here, at least according to the OSM Wiki.
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-17 13:16:00+00:00): The problem with that is machines are stupid about expanding abbreviations, and that doesn't change with the key.  That's the chief concern with name tags.
Glassman (2025-10-04 19:13:13+00:00): Please provide documentation that a concentration camp exists at this location.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170275099
user_5359 (2025-08-11 06:57:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why did you delete the building?
mazdamiata210 (2025-08-11 07:03:03+00:00): It was demolished and a new one was built that is not accurately represented by the map data
Taya_S (2025-09-21 12:31:11+00:00): Reverted data copied from unauthorised sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172243199
rempshaener (2025-08-11 10:30:45+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Vor dem Freitag fehlte noch ein Semikolon. Das habe ich schon (und zusätzlich sonn- und feiertags geschlossen) ergänzt.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
Glassman (2025-10-04 19:11:56+00:00): Please provide documentation that the prison exists.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170275738
eggie (2025-08-11 07:40:13+00:00): Dag bleuthoot, Zou dat paaltje in het midden van het traject er nog wel staan. Hoe komen bewoners met de auto bij nr 10?

MVG
eggie
user_16201490 (2025-08-11 07:46:42+00:00): Hallo eggie,

Dat paaltje had ik niet gezien (en dus vergeten weg te halen)
Maar het paaltje is er niet meer voor numer 10 is er niet meer.
eggie (2025-08-11 07:56:26+00:00): Oke .. thx voor het verwijderen.
Mapse
eggie
pitfire (2025-10-08 02:50:14+00:00): Hi AndiUhl,
gibt es eine Beschilderung, die ein "access=no" rechtfertigt? access=no ist eine Vollsperrung!
VG
Taya_S (2025-09-21 12:31:12+00:00): Reverted data copied from unauthorised sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172243199
NieWnen (2025-08-11 19:52:52+00:00): Dlaczego nieprzejezdna?
Szymon_Mark (2025-08-11 22:32:08+00:00): Drogi praktycznie nie ma i zarośnięta jest krzakami i drzewami.
NieWnen (2025-08-11 22:42:03+00:00): Na ortofotomapie drzew nie widać, krzaków nie wiem, no pewnie może być wysoka roślinność, natomiast  tutaj bardziej inne tagi by wtedy pasowały. 
Tag`bicycle=no` oznacza zakaz jazdy rowerem, a nie słabą przejezdność stąd moje pytanie.

Można dać np.
`trail_visibility=bad` jeśli drogę ciężko zobaczyć
`smoothness=horrible` albo niżej jeśli jej gładkość w przejezdności jest tragiczna (luźno tłumacząc).

I nawigacja nie powinna tędy kierować po dodaniu takich tagów. 

No chyba, że realnie tak jak piszesz tej drogi już kompletnie nie ma, to możesz zmienić cały fragment tej drogi na `abandoned:highway=track` albo `disused:highway=track` , to wtedy nic nią nie poprowadzi i też nikt nie powinien błędnie dodać.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned:*
syntex (2025-08-18 09:54:00+00:00): Dlaczego nie zachowałeś poprzedniego adresu ze znacznikiem old_addr:housenumber i old_addr:street? To jest ważna informacja, szczególnie że np. adresu urzędu nie zmieniłeś wcale.
Mariusz 2M (2025-08-18 10:15:09+00:00): Nie wiedziałem, że trzeba, dodałem dwa old_*
syntex (2025-08-18 10:29:22+00:00): Super, dzięki
Taya_S (2025-09-21 12:31:13+00:00): Reverted data copied from unauthorised sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172243199
silversurfer83 (2025-08-11 08:17:02+00:00): Moin Doc :)

ein paar kleine Hinweise, um deine Arbeit noch besser zu machen:

- Der Getränkemarkt ist ein wenig durcheinander geraten. Der "buidling=*" Wert sollte grundätzlich auf "retail" bleiben. Dass es nun ein Getränkemarkt ist, kannst du so zeigen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Dbeverages

- Der neue Aldi ist im Hintergrundbild "Hessen ALKIS" (JOSM: Hintergrund -> Karte) schon zu sehen. Damit kannst du die Umrisse sauber machen. Guck mal, dass du die Zufahrten entsprechend korrigierst, da diese ja offensichtlich nicht mehr so passen. Wenn Dinge nicht mit dem Luftbild übereinstimmen hilft anderen Mappern ein "note=Wegen Umbau Stand YYYY-MM nicht auf Luftbild erkennbar" oder so.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170277257
IpswichEdits (2025-08-11 07:55:46+00:00): Nice work. Well spotted. Did you perhaps mean Hotel instead of Horel? 😉Actually just noticed that the signage and website calls it "B&B Hotels" rather than "Hotel B&B". https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.052323748350375&lng=1.1397012249150293&z=17&dateFrom=2025-07-01&pKey=1297141558793715&focus=photo&x=0.6806568500520762&y=0.4137129472911903&zoom=0.9797225186766276
Jazzalaa (2025-08-11 08:55:22+00:00): Ahhh yes. Hotel rather than Horel! Fat fingers! 

And yes you’re right regarding name, the website made me think the other way around.
IpswichEdits (2025-08-11 09:14:24+00:00): Haha. I'm forever doing typos and having to go back later to correct them,😄and yes the url doesn't help. lol. Keep up the good work!
eggie (2025-08-11 07:49:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Het is niet duidelijk wat je doet.
Wat is Elgentos  Het zal niets doen in OSM.
Waarom een bijdrage Thuis op de kaart? Dat is niet de bedoeling van OSM.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-08-11 07:55:18+00:00): added companytags.. removed Thuis.
eggie (2025-08-11 07:52:55+00:00): Hi What is Elgentos? a company?

This has no effect in OSM.
Please comemnt your edits properly.

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2025-08-11 07:51:43+00:00): Reverted by changeset #170278520
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-09 10:28:41+00:00): Hello!

You used
tracktype=grade 2
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70708306/history

Have you maybe meant
tracktype=grade2
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
aixbrick (2025-08-12 15:12:47+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
dass viele der Wege tatsächlich nicht (mehr) vorhanden sind, würde ich auch sagen.
Allerdings existiert https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1069025585/ (Zufahrt nach https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1031818405) laut aktuellen Luftbildern.
Bei OSM werden Wege, die vorhanden, aber nicht öffentlich sind, nicht gelöscht, sondern mit Zutrittsbeschränkungen versehen (hier wäre das vermutlich "access=private").
Daher meine Frage: Gibt es den Weg noch?
Gruß
aixbrick (2025-08-23 08:11:17+00:00): Keine Reaktion, Weg wiederhergestellt und "access=private" gesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170865300.
eggie (2025-08-11 08:22:34+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Bedankt voor uw bijdrage.
MVG
eggie
validator
eggie (2025-08-11 08:00:49+00:00): Hoi Daniel... Lijkt me oke zo. Je heb alleen een tankstation per abuis verplaatst.
Zie https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170278567

Dat komt door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.
Schuiven doe je immers met de linker muisknop, maar selecteren ook. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-08-11 08:01:08+00:00): Tankstation teruggeplaatst
Ponderosopine (2025-08-12 01:21:37+00:00): Why did you do this? I made this by hand using BLM's boundaries
bdiscoe (2025-08-12 06:49:32+00:00): Don't worry, it is only improved. Keep in mind that BLM (like USGS NHD, etc.) is just a set of points digitized (often in the 1970s) from paper maps, with all sorts of artifacts, inaccuracies and inefficiencies.  These come into OSM often minimally edited, resulting in redundant ways, overnoding, and innacuracies preserved sometimes from decades ago.  When cleaning these up, great care is taken to follow the actual bounds, where is it often easy to see where the original dataset's shortcomings, e.g. when a boundary should follow a river but was made from inaccurate river data long ago.
Ponderosopine (2025-08-12 14:07:47+00:00): This ACEC was established in 2009 and the other one you deleted a lot of nodes from was established in 2007.
bdiscoe (2025-08-12 19:07:51+00:00): I'm glad to hear that the demarcation is not that old, tho the map features they may have used to digitize at that time may have been.  In any case, it's a good idea before uploading imports to do a Simplify with a small  value; in this case I used 30cm which is very small, in a typical satellite image it is less than one pixel.  Cleaning nodes with a small threshhold does not move the feature in any significant way, and it has all the advantages of map data that is easier to maintain and serve.