piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jrachi (2025-04-16 09:10:12+00:00): Ma bastava aggiungere i tag che dicono che non è mantenuto!
Ora devo contattare il referente locale e avviare una procedura di verifica che coinvolge anche l'amministrazione locale. Il sindaco è responsabile della "viabilità minore" come sentieri e strade agricole/forestali se fanno parte di un percorso a catasto.

Se non ti dispiace faccio un revert e aggiungo i tag corretti.

Ivo
itineralp (2025-04-16 09:18:59+00:00): Più che non mantenuto direi che è proprio scomparso. Comunque procedi come ritieni più corretto.
Buone mappature, ciao
eggie (2025-04-14 06:43:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  In OSM hoef je geen adresnodes aan te maken als het goed is. Die zijn al aanwezig. 
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Callistoweg+112&objectId=0518200001784022&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=82969.1090137096&geometry.y=453749.05365311384&zoomlevel=15.203777417038834

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-04-14 06:46:41+00:00): Overbodige adresnodes weer verwijderd.
Removed redundant addressnodes.
Gr eggie
YuliyaSurta (2025-04-14 06:24:55+00:00): Also fixed road geometry.
bxl-forever (2025-05-08 11:43:37+00:00): Hello @NguyenChuong.

Can we please request that you type correct description when you push data into the OSM database.

We saw a large number of edits by you, which you titled "Changes" or "Add".  This is not a correct way to describe your actions.  Especially not saying that you "add" things when you massively delete buildings like in this changeset.  (I do not object against erasing old buildings, but please describe correctly what to expect with your changes.)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks in advance, and happy mapping!
eggie (2025-04-14 06:50:03+00:00): Removed redundant address
AndersAndersson (2025-05-23 15:02:58+00:00): Hej!
Varför tog du bort alla flowlines?
AndersAndersson (2025-05-26 05:45:11+00:00): Hello NKA
Please answer why you did remove all those waterway=flowlines.
mariotomo (2025-05-05 14:12:55+00:00): a gap was created in the road.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165848523
bxl-forever (2025-04-14 11:14:19+00:00): Hello,

Pardon my asking but it looks like something weird happened with this changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12488402635/history

Version 1 included a valid phone number.

You replaced it with "+32 00000000" which is obviously a non-number.  It looks like an automated change made by your software.

Either Foodmaker does not have a phone number anymore—and in that case the key should be removed entirely—or there is something wrong with the software you use to import data into OSM.

This comment also applies to those two other changesets of yours
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164923379
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164923427

Can you please have a look.
bxl-forever (2025-04-14 11:20:15+00:00): Also on this changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164923466

I see the problem now.
On the Foodmaker website they have a problem with their database and empty values are printed as a weird "0000000" character string.
https://foodmaker.be/v4/?pagina=fmRestaurants&accept=all

My request to you (and your other team members) is the following.
If you see such weird values, please ignore them and do not import those non-existing phone numbers into OSM.

Apart from that, thanks for the good work you are doing.
Evgeniya_rocketdata (2025-04-14 14:42:02+00:00): Hello! 

We will clarify this issue and be more attentive. Thank you very much! 

Best regards, Evgeniya!
Langlaeufer (2025-04-14 16:47:43+00:00): Hallo Jan,

Ist der Radweg auf der Brücke wirklich gepflastert? Ich würde dort alles in Beton erwarten und nicht nur den Fußweg?

Grüße Langläufer
jan-schwebel (2025-04-15 16:58:36+00:00): Moin, 
habs gerade noch einmal gecheckt und ja, ich lag falsch. Auf der Brücke ist alles aus Beton, direkt danach ist es aber getrennt (Beton / Pflastersteine).
LG Jan
silversurfer83 (2025-04-15 19:40:52+00:00): Hi :)

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand deine Änderung ansieht.

Sieht ganz brauchbar aus. Adresse, Zahlungsmodalitäten (nur Cash?, dann den Wert in "only" ändern), Name. Alles an einem eingenen Punkt (node) erfasst. Passt.

Öffnungszeiten und Telefonnummer sind zwar Menschenlesbar haben jedoch noch das falsche Format. Guck mal auf folgenden Seiten:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone

Bei Fragen immer raus damit
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164923797
flohoff (2025-04-14 09:42:00+00:00): Moin,

an dieser Stelle wäre ich vorsichtig weil der Eigentümer hier selber gemapped hat - Wenn ich mich richtig entsinne habe ich das mit dem Diskutiert - User:Ralph Pavenstädt

Der will explizit das die Wege hier nicht genutzt werden und genutzt werden dürfen.

Wenn das für euren Anwendungsfall ein Problem ist müsst ihr das in euren Lokalen Daten fixen.

Flo
Glocke-Oelde (2025-04-14 10:13:14+00:00): Hey Floh,

unser Gehfolgen-Software navigiert von Westen bis zum Tor. Laut unserem Zusteller wird HsNr. 2 von Osten aus (also an den Silos vorbei) angefahren und auch den Weg zurück wieder verlassen. (irgendwie muss Post und Zeitung doch zum Haus kommen?!)

Viele Grüße,
Patrick
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-26 09:23:33+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173784917
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-26 09:23:08+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173784897
t_ja (2025-04-14 18:13:10+00:00): Ahoj,
pokiaľ na danom mieste existuje kaplnka, tak ju treba zakresliť ako nový bod, a nie preznačiť existujúci strom na kaplnku. S najväčšou pravdepodobnosťou ten strom tam stále je (vidieť to na leteckých snímkoch), a na pozícii zakreslenej kaplnky je vidieť len lúku, t.j. je zakreslená na chybných súradniciach :(

T.
jadra (2025-04-15 07:41:47+00:00): Ahoj, ako som písal, kaplnku nevidno, je skrytá pod stromom, preto sa mi zdalo pre uživateľa prehľadnejšie prepísať strom na kaplnku. Ono tých sólo stromov tam je totiž omnoho viacej ako je zaznačených v OPSM a teda ten jeden prepísaný nehrá žiadnu rolu.. Doporučujem pozriet toto miesto v mapy.cz (v leteckej mape) tam mi to zaniesli úplne správne (aj s fotografiou) - pod stromom, preto neviem kde vidíš, že to mám na chybných súradniciach, na voľnej lúke.
Dodávam, že som v editačnom prostredí OPSM nový, ak to naozaj zle vysvetľujem, nechám sa poučiť a  rád to opravím.  
Ospravedlňujem sa za komplikácie.
jadra
flohoff (2025-04-14 09:29:18+00:00): Moin,
gegen diesen Changeset habe ich was.

Das ist beschildert mit "Privatweg - Benutzung verboten" - Da steht nichts von Durchfahrt.

Also ist das private nicht destination.

Flo
Glocke-Oelde (2025-04-14 09:38:46+00:00): Hallo Flo,

die Routenberechnung (OSM-basiert) ist hier trotz Privat vom Hofkamp über das Gelände. zur Oelder Str. Ich wollte mit "Destination"die Durchfahrt unterbinden.

Vielleicht hast Du eine Idee?

Viele Grüße,
Patrick
flohoff (2025-04-14 09:47:24+00:00): private ist härter als destination - Destination heisst du darfst REIN fahren aber nicht durch.

private heisst _gar nicht_.

Hier auch nochmal was da an Schildern steht.

Das private ist richtig. Eure Applikation macht da Unsinn.

https://www.google.de/maps/@51.8567051,8.2326096,3a,56.8y,299.14h,84.62t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1snLP1slzU6theKQbKmYXsLg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D5.3803552503223955%26panoid%3DnLP1slzU6theKQbKmYXsLg%26yaw%3D299.1351537713482!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDQwOS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
flohoff (2025-04-14 09:51:44+00:00): Und nochmal so als Hinweis. 

OSM ist eine Faktensammlung. Wir mappen und erfassen das was vor Ort für Jedermall sichtbar ist.

OSM ist keine Datenbank für EUCH die ihr jetzt so hin massiert das das für euch passt.

Ich werde solche Änderunge reverten.

Wenn ihr parameter im routing braucht die EUCH die Durchfahrt ermöglichen, im gegensatz zu dem was der Eigentümer beschildert hat, dann müsst ihr das anders lösen.

D.h. entweder selber eine LIste von Wegen pflegen die in eurer Applikation dann entgegen dem tagging in OSM freigegeben werden, oder ein neues tag "erfinden" mit dem ihr wege freigeben könnt a la "postal_delivery=yes" oder sowas das IHR dann in EUREM router auswertet und nutzt.

Denn hier dinge mit "access=destination" freigeben entgegen dem ausdrücklichen Wunsch des Eigentümers wird jede menge Ärger produzieren.

Flo
Glocke-Oelde (2025-04-14 10:18:11+00:00): Hi Flo,

dann habe ich "destination" leider falsch interpretiert (Zugang erlaubt, Durchfahrt verboten).
Ich habe aber bereits das Entwicklerteam unserer Software angeschrieben, da ich noch andere Adressen habe, wo das Routing über "private" erfolgt, obwohl die Software diese ja strikt meiden sollte.
aharvey (2025-06-29 23:54:33+00:00): hi why did you change https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/451869895 to not:operator:wikidata=Q5260271 I assume it's from the iD suggestion, perhaps you clicked the wrong button?

I also just did https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168286708 since I got sick of people changing these one at a time through iD tag suggestions.
donmac703 (2025-06-30 01:01:00+00:00): You are correct, the screen paint sometimes alters the screen after the thought and muscle process of clicking the button begins, resulting in a a different button being clicked... :-(
Gregory Peony (2025-04-14 16:55:46+00:00): The Eastern footprint is valid and looks appropriately shaped, the orientation could be a little more accurate: zooming out gives better orientation information. The western footpritnt may actually represent a barrier like a fence or wall given that it casts shadows around its entire perimiter and nothing else is close enough to it to cast those shadows in its stead. Thanks for mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164925482
aharvey (2025-04-15 00:44:47+00:00): but are pedestrians strictly forbidden based on signage or otherwise? or is it just the case of it's not the best idea to walk here?
northodox (2025-04-15 05:08:46+00:00): Good point. I have no signage or otherwise to support this. Macquarie Pass seems to not restrict pedestrians, either, which I now see is marked as foot="not specified". Perhaps this change should be rejected until/if I find something authoritative.
aharvey (2025-04-15 05:53:32+00:00): foot=* is meant to be used for legal accessibility, and legally you can walk on any road except where there is no pedestrian signage like on some motorways.

To indicate there's no infrastructure for pedestrians we can use sidewalk=no (no footpath alongside the road), shoulder=* (is there a shoulder that may provide some space for pedestrians) or even barrier=guard_rail (though not that helpful unless we can somehow tag if there is space to walk outside the guard rail).
northodox (2025-04-15 06:50:30+00:00): Thanks for your time and explanation. I think there are sub-sections within the selected section of road that would fit those attributes you describe. I think it's best to reject this and I'll review the road for sub-sections that suit those tags. (I've also contacted the local council on advice re: pedestrian access.)
aharvey (2025-04-16 02:41:39+00:00): Thanks, any improvements would be great.

> I think it's best to reject this

OSM doesn't have a concept of accept/reject. Changesets are applied immediately and automatically, then if we want to roll back we can either manually restore to the prior state or revert the changeset (either partially or fully).
Yog Sot (2025-04-14 10:22:04+00:00): odpuścisz sobie kiedys edycje tej ścieżki norweskiej? ;) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/276981537/history
JakubS (2025-04-14 17:20:21+00:00): Ups, jakaś stara niezapisana zmiana w Rykkinn musiała wisieć od paru tygodni w aplikacja i poszła razem z dzisiejszą edycją w Krakowie.
Yog Sot (2025-04-14 19:53:01+00:00): no dobra, faktycznie tylko raz ci sie to zdarzyło ;>
pyrog (2025-06-29 08:18:25+00:00): Ce n'est pas une machine à café mais une agence de MaxiCoffee.
Quelle est sa spécialité ?
vente/maintenance de distributeurs automatiques, vente de café…

J'ai corrigé en partie et ajouté le SIRET.

Il faudrait homogénéiser la saisie des agences dans OSM 😉
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/26UM
Pink Duck (2025-10-09 13:58:19+00:00): Is a choice, but suspect post and parcel couriers might prefer the address to resolve to a building than the boundary.
Robert Whittaker (2025-10-09 14:06:02+00:00): Yes, but arguably the hospice covers the grounds as well. And if you want to know the address of the hospice you need to tag the address on the hospice object. If you want to tag a delivery point, then we probably need a separate object for that.

What do you do for e.g. a large University campus? You wouldn't just put the address on the post room / good in (for deliveries) or the main reception (for visitors) ? But it would be good if you could somehow indicate that that's the place to deliver things or turn up to in person for that address.
Pink Duck (2025-10-09 14:10:06+00:00): Thing is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:delivery_point seems to be about whether a postal address is a deliverable unit. Not the actual co-ord of mail drop/collect. Adding an amenity=letter_box might help, but then it's separate from the address.
drkt (2025-04-14 13:01:23+00:00): Please be careful and review your changes before submitting them. A changeset of this size is not hard to keep track of.

You broke Torsted Bæk. I have fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164938131
lamms (2025-08-31 08:04:58+00:00): Is "Hair Salon" the actual name of the hairdresser?
Frederik (2025-08-31 08:56:14+00:00): Probably not - would have to check but probably https://perthbarbershops.com.au/perth-city-barber-perth-train-station-barbershop/
kuhni74 (2025-04-14 11:22:48+00:00): merci
Norbert Dichter (2025-04-14 09:12:39+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164928210
literan (2025-04-14 19:59:24+00:00): 1) капс в названии - НЕ НАДО ОРАТЬ

2) кривой формат адреса

3) в поле name пишется только название, имя собственное
Smajser (2025-08-17 11:07:19+00:00): Hi,

can you please double check all AikBank offices.
As far as I can see you are putting pins from their website and those pins are often inacurate.
Please check this node
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12343345676

Bank is placed inside tennis court, but it should be in building B23 Office Park.

Please, when reviewing data take into consideration address on website which is far more accurate than pins.

Best regards
Smajser (2025-08-17 14:19:25+00:00): This one also does not exist

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12343345678
Evgeniya_rocketdata (2025-08-20 13:44:14+00:00): Hello! 

Okay, we will double-check AikBank offices. 

We will take the information regarding the pins on the site into account in our future work, thank you very much! 

Best regards
MaliMrav (2025-08-23 18:49:26+00:00): Hi Evgeniya_rocketdata,

I see that you are using tag:

brand:wikipedia=en:Naša AIK Banka

I think this is incorrect. As you can read on the Wikipedia page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Na%C5%A1a_AIK_Banka

"Naša AIK Banka" does not exist anymore.

You probably want to use:

brand:wikipedia=en:AikBank

Can you please fix this and other entries for AikBank?

Thank you.
Smajser (2025-08-24 08:28:24+00:00): Hi everyone,

Evgeniya_rocketdata can you also check following 

1) phone numbers. For example here phone is not correct:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12399606374

2) Operator is not correct

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12399606374

3) there are locations that are left behind after merging Eurobank and AikBank. Those locations should also be checked.  For example:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11248543637


4) on some places now there are "duplicates". Eurobank and AikBank exist in same place that also should be correctd. Please look here for example

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5921426429
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12399609131

5) It would also be good to include all contact information in all locations including youtube, facebook, instagram and linkedin profiles.



Best regards
Evgeniya_rocketdata (2025-08-25 08:35:32+00:00): Thank you for your comments Smajser, MaliMrav . You made a very good point. We will need some time to update our patch packages.
Smajser (2025-09-15 14:09:40+00:00): Hi Evgenya,

I just wanted to check how things are going with AikBank?


Best regards
Smajser (2025-10-04 09:36:56+00:00): Hi Evgeniya,
can you reply with some ETA on this issue?
Problem was reported 2 months ago, and there is still no changes made.
dadavid (2025-05-06 02:04:59+00:00): hi, 

fyi, euer description=* text ist zu lang und wird unten abgeschnitten. Bitte vor dem Korrigieren den OpenStreetMap-Wiki-Eintrag [1] durchlesen. 

Der description=* tag ist nicht für Werbebotschaften gedacht. 

vg

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description
map per (2025-04-14 10:01:57+00:00): Hallo Naturpark Ammergauer Alpen,

wisst ihr schon wo die (jetzt unterbrochene) Meditationsweg Wanderroute in Zukunft verlaufen wird?

Viele Grüße
map per
Naturpark Ammergauer Alpen (2025-04-17 12:46:59+00:00): Servus, 
der Meditationsweg wird südlich über den Mandlweg über die Schaukäserei umgeleitet und führt von der Käserei wieder gen Norden über die Klosterstraße auf den bisherigen Wegeverlauf des Meditationsweg zurück. 
Liebe Grüße
map per (2025-04-22 14:07:39+00:00): In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165070562 hast du einen anderen Wegverlauf (nicht bis ganz bis zur Schaukäserei) eingetragen. Welche von den beiden Wegrouten ist da jetzt richtig?
Naturpark Ammergauer Alpen (2025-04-28 07:59:30+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, die Relationen müssten jetzt korrekt angegeben sein.
map per (2025-04-28 12:29:40+00:00): Danke!
elot360 (2025-04-14 11:42:10+00:00): Jeśli ruch z Chebzia (W domyśle, od Ronda Unii Europejskiej) w kierunku Goduli i Bytomia prowadzony jest dwukierunkowo po jezdni ulicy Dworcowej, kategoria jezdni ulicy Asfaltowej (Przy stacji Orlen) powinna zostać zdegradowana i być tożsama z kategorią ulicy Droga do Lipin
Tomek | Yanosik (2025-04-14 11:59:32+00:00): Dzięki, poprawione. Bypass mogę jutro po śladach sprawdzić
maro21 (2025-04-14 20:53:10+00:00): Nie dodawaj proszę tagu parking=surface do miejsca parkingowego. Nie powinno go tam być.
Nequit (2025-04-14 21:09:42+00:00): Ok, usunąłem.
maro21 (2025-04-15 19:03:19+00:00): Dzięki.
ralrei (2025-04-15 05:08:42+00:00): Hat hier wirklich jeder Gebäudeteil die Hausnummer 17c? Finde ich ungewöhnlich. Normalerweise gibts nur einmal die Hausnummer, meist am Eingang.
Beetlejuice (2025-04-15 09:17:52+00:00): Der ganze Komplex ist nur ein zusammenhängendes Gebäude.
TinPetreković (2025-04-15 11:34:08+00:00): Accidental node creation #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164980272
silversurfer83 (2025-04-15 19:37:13+00:00): Hi :)

wie ist denn die Beschilderung dieses Abschnitts von der Benninghauser Str. aus?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164932309
Glocke-Oelde (2025-04-16 11:01:28+00:00): Hallo,

Schild "Durchfahrt verboten" mit "Privat" ist auch via StreetView zu sehen:
https://www.google.de/maps/@51.6952635,8.2501921,3a,47.1y,283.12h,86.41t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s_zomjcpnODbRWS7BGhT2mw!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D3.594154863227189%26panoid%3D_zomjcpnODbRWS7BGhT2mw%26yaw%3D283.12214450826!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDQxMy4wIKXMDSoJLDEwMjExNDUzSAFQAw%3D%3D

Viele Grüße,
Patrick
silversurfer83 (2025-04-16 11:47:47+00:00): Hallo Patrick,

Danke. Mit Google kann ich bei OSM leider nichts anfangen. Dürfen wir nicht benutzen.

Ist das ein VZ nach StvO? Aktuell ist dieser Abschnitt für absolut alle (vom Füßgänger bis zum LKW) auf privat. Gibt das VZ das her? "Durchfahrt verboten" klingt so, als sei nur Kraftverkehr (ggf. + Fahrrad) privat und Fuß (zähneknirschend) erlaubt.
Glocke-Oelde (2025-04-17 05:51:14+00:00): Guten Morgen,

da steht VZ250 mit Zusatz Privatweg.
Ich habe dann mal die Fußgänger auf yes gesetzt. War mir tatsächlich nicht bekannt, dass bei "Privatweg" das betreten dennoch gesetzlich erlaubt ist.

Viele Grüße
Patrick
philippec (2026-05-19 20:51:50+00:00): Ik heb deze jaren geleden al gemapt.
Ik weet niet wie ze gewist heeft.
MCC_ZET (2025-04-15 14:55:43+00:00): Jakie jest źródło adresów.
DD nie posiada adresów dla bloków C, D ani E.
Ze względu na planowaną drogę jest spora szansa że bloki C i D będą miały adres 8 i 8A. Antoniewska 6B zostanie przypisana do bloku E.
frydzio (2025-04-15 15:07:12+00:00): Źródłem adresów jest miejski serwis mapowy https://mapa.um.warszawa.pl/mapaApp1/mapa?service=mapa&L=PL&X=7505993.869633831&Y=5784677.633063517&S=16&O=0&T=7d8feffeffffe03db000801ba007e801fa007e801fa007c06160500020f8000ffc7f812dbbfdb19036db6dffe0380601800000008802c027cc08fb8e002010e000005fe0000000000000000200010010010030000000007fffe08208208208208ff100x8A
Obecnie zostały nadane takie adresy ale rzeczywiście w przyszłości może się to zmienić, gdy nadane zostaną nazwy dla nowych ulic.
aharvey (2025-04-15 00:42:42+00:00): do you think we should swap the conditional? Some data consumers won't support conditionals, or even if they do they may still default to the non-conditional. In the case of "closed at night", I think it's better to say it's "open, except at night" instead of it's "closed, except during the day".
TheSwavu (2025-04-15 04:35:41+00:00): access:conditional= Oct-Mar 06:00-18:30, Apr-Sep 07:00-16:30

Which is what was there before does not mean anything.

As to which way around you'd like the default to be if a data consumer can't digest a conditional, that'd would depend on what you think the safer option would be.