piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2023-03-15 20:54:35+00:00): Howdy,

first of all, I don't think every way needs the information whether horses are allowed.
Second: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle
The first sentence: LEGAL restrictions.
You can add the width and the smoothness and the MTB Scale to the way. It's up to the data consumer to interpret this information.

Same goes for horse
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:horse
It is a legal key. Please use it that way. The page links you to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:horse_scale. If you feel, you need to put the info for horses on the way, please use this.

That's what I think and what people put in the wiki.

cheers :)
Brainus (2023-03-20 23:26:57+00:00): I changed it here - as wished...

Appears a bit pettifogging from my point of view.
Path is impassable, even by donkey and Croatian state is NOT Germany - they don't put forbids(igns) everywhere ;-)

I won't use a horsemans-scale, cause I'm not a horseman.
So in the end  the result is 'less information'.
silversurfer83 (2023-03-21 05:41:53+00:00): Hi

You *may* have a valid point there. Maybe the local tagging convention is different but before you start tagging ways in this way I would strongly advise you to seek out the local community (I don't know which channels they use. So check out community.openstreetmap.org or the wiki) and ask them about it.
IF there's a "vote" in favor of your way of tagging ways, go ahead. Until then I'd go with the wiki which clearly states the legal rules are tagged.

Sound good?

Cheers
Matija Nalis (2023-11-02 11:12:12+00:00): `smoothness=impassable` is popular and clear tag to mark that way is unpassable by any wheeled vehicle; see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness
There is also popular https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sac_scale to indicate how problematic it is for humans (and horses, I guess). In addition to previously mentioned tags, there is also some use of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle:physical to indicate physical possibility of using a bicycle (instead of legal restrictions), but it has some problems mentioned on their wiki, so I'd personally stick to the `smoothness=impassable` + `sac_scale=*`
aTarom (2023-03-26 16:15:02+00:00): Hola,
puedes revisar el tag
"shelter_type"="mo"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370457443/history
Gracias, saludos
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2023-03-29 15:16:02+00:00): Corregido, gracias.
kapazao (2023-03-11 17:51:47+00:00): Hola, creo que no sabes que las "tertiary" se usan en población para dar prioridad de circulación a las vías y por eso estás cambiando en Dílar estas vías. Están como tertiary porque son vías principales, sino tendrán la misma prioridad que las demás y los ruteadores no irán bien. Deberías dejarlas como estaban.

Llevan la etiqueta noref=yes para indicar que no tienen una referencia al ser vías con esta clasificación y así por ejemplo sabemos que no continúa la GR-3209.

Un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133549953
Frans S (2023-03-11 18:56:01+00:00): See my previous comment.
highways residential are to be tagged in urban areas. 
This is outside a town.  Unclassified is to be used here.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133550032
Frans S (2023-03-11 18:54:27+00:00): Thanks for mapping on this project.
About highway tagging:
You used wrong taggings .
Please use the rules how to tag highways on this project according to this wiki.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133550275
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-11 12:11:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153444363

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Dawid2849 (2023-03-31 21:40:19+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tego łącznika? On dalej istnieje? Nie został usunięty po zakończeniu naprawy wiaduktu?
moje_konto (2023-04-03 21:11:42+00:00): www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134463020 dzisiaj go usunął.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-11 12:20:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153447197

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
gscholz (2023-03-13 06:33:36+00:00): Hi abebayehuz,
this changeset has left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=38.84037&lat=8.99955&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133551610

It seems to me you tried to add a public transport line. Plse educate yourself about how this is properly done:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation#Bus_route

You may also like to educate yourself about how to add proper changeset comments:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind regards
Guido
just_another_mapper (2023-03-12 11:41:00+00:00): Nice work!!
Tilia_J (2023-03-11 19:53:45+00:00): Dear Karaga,

What exactly did you try to fix? And what was the intended outcome? What  QA tool did you consult?

In fact, instead of fixing a relevant property you just deleted it.

I notice that you do "fixes" all over the world. Assuming that Dutch isn't your native language (if you speak Dutch at all) how are you able to assess a specific Dutch word?

leemkuil = loam pit = loam quarry

So with loam in mind the landuse=quarry suggests using the key:resource

So instead of deleting this entry you should have changed landuse:nl to resource=loam. Although never documented on the wiki "loam" is actually in use.

A final thought: 
According to your stats you were only active on ten days after you created your account in may 2022.

Using advanced editors like level0 and RevertUi is an indication of a gross overestimation of knowledge and competence for an inexperienced user like you.
DiogoBaptista98 (2023-07-04 16:48:37+00:00): não deviam ser colocados todos os lotes em construção?
meioserrano (2023-07-04 20:06:09+00:00): Só estes é que estão em construção.. os outros lotes estão só ocupados para estaleiro
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-03-13 09:08:36+00:00): Dies hier ist die Siedlung Wolterdingen (gehört zu Wolterdingen). Das Wikidata-item gehört zu Wolterdingen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/299801713

Oder?
ibanez (2023-03-13 16:35:15+00:00): Je nachdem ob man Wolterdingen als eine Einheit betrachtet oder Dorf und Siedlung getrennt. Hab die Änderung verworfen.
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-03-14 07:24:20+00:00): Ich erkundige mich mal bei einem gebürtigen Wolterdinger.
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-03-14 08:27:19+00:00): Ich habe für die Siedlung Wolterdingen nun eine eigenes Wikidata Item angelegt und verlinkt. Ebenso für die Siedlung Drögeheide. Die Siedlung Ahlften fehlte auch noch in OSM.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133655373
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-03-14 08:38:28+00:00): Unsicher bin ich mir nur, ob bei allen drei Ortsteilen/Siedlungen place=village richtig ist. Vielleicht steckst Du da mehr in dem Thema.

Siedlung Wolterdingen und Siedlung Drögenheide gehören zu Wolterdingen. Wolterdingen wiederum ist ein Ortsteil der Stadt Soltau. Siedlung Ahlften grenzt direkt an die Siedlung Wolterdingen (ebenfalls ein Ortsteil von Soltau).
ibanez (2023-03-14 15:42:23+00:00): Ich würde hier selber auch place=village mappen.
Đuro Jiří (2023-04-04 22:10:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153454700

Questa strada era mappata bene,ora non rispondono alla realtà.
baprischka (2023-04-05 20:35:13+00:00): Non capisco a cosa ti riferisci, ho solo separato questo tratto di strada da quello che fa parte della rotatoria perché devono avere chiavi diversi. Erano separati prima ma il 28 novembre 2022 qualcuno li ha uniti.
Đuro Jiří (2023-04-05 21:55:28+00:00): Intendevo dire che questa strada non è dritta, ma leggermente curva.  Come l'ho mappato l'anno scorso.  Ieri, verso mezzanotte, sono arrivati ​​a Grado e ho notato che questo percorso è stato modificato.  Stamattina ho scattato alcune foto con StreetCompete e ho corretto questa strada.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3628241
maciek-szn (2023-03-11 13:46:20+00:00): Wycofałem - poprzednia restrykcja była prawidłowa, a po edycji jest błędna.
TheWartek (2023-03-11 14:20:44+00:00): Dzięki za czujność. Masz rację. Mój błąd. Sorry za zamieszanie. Nie popatrzyłem na znaki poziome. W komentarzach któregoś postu na FB zauważyłem, że ktoś wrzucił screen z Yanosika pokazujący, że nawigacja zamiast jechać "Przyjaciół żołnierza" prosto każe skręcić w prawo, potem gdzieś zawrócić na "Księcia Warcisława" i wrócić na Przyjaciół Żołnierza. Myślałem, że to błąd w mapie no ale jednak rzeczywiście błąd w algorytmie Yanosika, który źle interpretuje tą restrykcję.
gscholz (2023-03-13 06:30:37+00:00): Hi abebayehuz,
this changeset has left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:


https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=38.84037&lat=8.99955&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133552988

It seems to me you tried to add a public transport line. Plse educate yourself about how this is properly done:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation#Bus_route

You may also like to educate yourself about how to add proper changeset comments:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind regards
Guido
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-11 13:20:19+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4278999527
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153456652

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2023-03-11 18:52:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped.  However, Not all buildings are fair squared. You also mapped the shadow of a building as part of the building.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133553393
Riyadi IRM-RV (2023-04-27 02:05:59+00:00):  Hi FenyMufyd. thank you for contributing to OSM.
I do armchair to this area. I found several warnings about multipoygon 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133553401

I see a long segment of wood around without a specific area shape only a square in this area nor a specific role in relation. 

but multipolygon represents areas (polygons), typically complex areas with holes inside, or consisting of multiple disjoint areas.

I am curious about this area. would you mind coming to recheck? perhaps this common polygon landuse./natural without relation more appropriate.

thank you
FenyMufyd (2023-04-30 05:55:30+00:00): Hello Riyadi, I may or may not merge the inside squares into a bigger relation later. You probably don't need to 'fix' any warning here before consulting to the openstreetmap Data Working Group first

The last time a colleague in your team is trying to 'fix' invalid relation in this area was this https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133693273 and they made the entire forest area into a single residential village that was supposed to be only a coordinate.

This forest project is following example from canada forest import for the square division system, if you would like to add more squares to the remaining forest outline i would appreciate that :)

Thank you,
FenyMufyd
Iko IRM-RV (2023-05-08 07:12:56+00:00): Hallo FenyMufyd,
kami baru menyadari kamu berdomisili di Indonesia, jadi lebih baik kita ngobrol2 pakai bahasa indonesia saja ya :)

Saya Iko dari Perkumpulan OpenStreetMap Indonesia (POI) saat ini kami sedang ada project untuk memperbaiki data-data di OSM yang ada di beberapa negara di Asia. terkait dengan komentar salah satu team saya mengenai hutan yang ada di Kalimantan ini, kami menemukan beberapa object yang cukup jarang di temui seperti polygon hutan yang berbentuk kotak2 dan memiliki relasi didalamnya. sebetulnya fokus pertama kami adalah di relasi nya namun kami menyadari bentuk yang cukup jarang ditemui untuk landuse hutan yaitu kotak. 

dari jawabanmu sepertinya kamu tau lebih banyak mengenai data hutan di Kalimantan ini, menurutmu apa yang bisa dilakukan untuk data2 seperti ini? biarkan saja seperti ini atau ada hal yang bisa di improve?

terima kasih
gscholz (2023-03-13 06:32:22+00:00): Hi abebayehuz,
this changeset has left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=38.84037&lat=8.99955&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133553411

It seems to me you tried to add a public transport line. Plse educate yourself about how this is properly done:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation#Bus_route

You may also like to educate yourself about how to add proper changeset comments:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind regards
Guido
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-28 08:20:59+00:00): Maybe shop=hairdresser_supply would fit a bit better for Salon Centric at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10727643493 ?

Or are both fitting equally well?

( see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dhairdresser_supply )
maxolasersquad (2025-01-29 22:14:16+00:00): I think so. I made these edits while traveling and do not specifically remember this business.
tbicr (2023-03-11 15:46:36+00:00): Вітаю

заўважыў, што на мяжы зь Беларусьсю Вы мяняеце назвы пазначыныя на дзьвух мовах на адну, напрыклад з `Нямыльня - Немильня` на `Немильня - Немильня` (такі ж паўтор і з украінскаю)

вось прыклады https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8330653, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/581719710, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927177585

было б выдатна падзяляць way па розныя бакі мяжы, а way па мяжы і relation застаўляць дзьвумоўным

таксама заўважыў, што ў Вас з https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Telvin йдзе канфліт зьменаў, які бачны ў аб'ектах якія я застіў як прыклад вышэй, магчыма мае сэнс вырашыць гэты канфлікт асабіста ці з дапамогаю DWG
avinet_ua (2023-03-11 15:59:55+00:00): стосовно прикладів - це помилка, вибач. я поверну попередні назви, якщо побачиш десь ще - пиши

з приводу юзера - то я вже у dwg написав
Mazda05 (2023-06-10 22:49:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1143362455
Ropino (2023-03-24 19:31:56+00:00): Hi,
please check/correct:
"maxspeed=8070" ?
8070 sounds very fast ;)
Thx in advance
TripleBee (2023-03-25 14:07:07+00:00): You didn't try it first?
I changed it to a more reasonable speed.
Frans S (2023-03-11 18:50:41+00:00): Hello. thanks for mapping on this project
About highway tagging:

Please use the rules how to tag highways on this project according to this wiki.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
You mapped the buildings accurate and squared, However, the shadow alongside the building is not part of the building and may not included.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133554453
Frans S (2023-03-11 18:48:04+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133555008
Famlam (2023-05-18 22:29:01+00:00): Dag jxpsert,
Ik heb ook even een knoop toegevoegd op de kruising van het fietspad met deze weg :)
osm915 (2023-03-25 19:23:35+00:00): Hallo JTE Dimandix
I was in this area a few months ago and there was no sign of any construction work (e.g. at https://osm.org/way/1153468913).
Do you know when construction will start? If it is not in the near future, I would suggest tagging all planned highways as highway=proposed rather than construction.
Please also see my comment on a similar changeset at https://osm.org/changeset/105732636

What do you think?
JTE Dimandix (2023-04-23 09:13:56+00:00): Hello there and sorry for the late anwser.
The construction is estimated to start around 2024-2025, as far as I remember. However, I can't guarrantee, as Greece has a poor relationship with large scale projects. 
I didn't know about the "proposed" tag, I might fix it. But note that the construction tag is widely used, even on roads that are indeed proposed (ie the road around Giannitsa)
osm915 (2023-04-28 19:42:27+00:00): Hi JTE Dimandix
thanks for taking care of the construction->proposed changes for the future A90 with https://osm.org/changeset/135254540 .
I have fixed a few more proposed parts of the highway and some future highway_junctions you missed with https://osm.org/changeset/135481801
Best regards!
berndw (2023-03-11 14:26:55+00:00): Das revertierte Changeset 128731505 liess sich nur mit Konflikten zurücksetzen.

Zusätzliche Änderungen sind möglich und sollten mit Ortskenntnis behoben werden
Leo Slager (2023-03-11 22:09:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
skyper (2023-03-13 16:11:18+00:00): Hallo RicGer,
laut Maps4BW ist hier eine Brücke und kein Durchfluss (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153470899). Was stimmt?
Fragende Grüße,
skyper
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-11 14:40:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15588987

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
marczoutendijk (2023-03-11 16:10:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6939

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
jonorossi (2023-03-22 12:29:53+00:00): Hi, Electro97, welcome to OSM.

The name=* tag should not be used for descriptions. name=Shed on a building=shed doesn't achieve anything. Unless your house has a name with a sign on the front like some old Queenslanders, don't put a description of how you use it (e.g. "Main House") in the name field, the same applies with the 4 buildings in this change.

For more information on how you should use the name field check out the OSM Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
jonorossi (2023-03-22 12:31:18+00:00): You'll also want to tag the pool as a swimming pool with using the iD preset or:

leisure=swimming_pool
access=private
location=outdoor
pesec (2023-03-13 05:00:25+00:00): Добрый день.
Данный тэг button_operated желательно использовать при наличии кнопки управления. При её отсутствии он излишен и приводит только к перегрузке базы данных.
pesec (2023-03-13 05:07:48+00:00): Добрый день.
Тэг smoothness используется для обозначения проходимости дороги колёсной техникой. Для пешеходных и велосипедных дорожек, он не применяется, т.к. априори подразумевается их пригодность для проезда. Определяющим является покрытие.
literan (2023-03-15 10:01:46+00:00): pesec, вы неправы. Велосипед это тоже колесная техника, поэтому для дорожек и велодорожек этот тег применяется (собственно, в вики к критериям относят преодолимость на велосипедах, на роликовых коньках). https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness

ничего про неприменимость для дорожек в вики нет (мало того, в редакторах при выборе заготовки footway или cycleway предлагается внести характеристику smoothness).
pesec (2023-03-15 10:05:29+00:00): literan, хорошо, принимается. Мной прочтение вики воспринималось иначе.
Frans S (2023-03-11 18:46:02+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:

Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Square each rectangular building with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133556773
Frans S (2023-03-11 18:46:27+00:00): In addition to my comments:
Buildings need to be tagged as building=yes.
Your mappings are far oversized and not squared.
Please zoom in rather far to be able to map accurate and follow the rooflines.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133556773
Frans S (2023-03-15 16:17:09+00:00): About highway tagging:

Please apply the rules described in this wiki
Most common taggings.
Rural areas : Unclassified,  track , path, service
Urban areas: unclassified, residential, path.


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133556773
CheWan Sh Mustafa (2023-03-11 15:21:34+00:00): 24/7 کاتژمێر کروەیە 
هەموو ڕۆژ
jmarchon (2023-03-11 18:58:31+00:00): Hello,
It looks like the Wikidata code you added here is for the brand, not for this specific bank location. I've improved the tagging to reflect this.

Happy mapping!
SK53 (2023-03-13 14:26:33+00:00): This is actually the head office so it would have been appropriate, but my intention was in creating the wiki data item was to support use as brand.
eggie (2023-07-31 10:17:25+00:00): .... Met Go Map   Heb je nu gecheckt wat je het resultaat was van je edits?
Denk het niet zo te zien. Alle landuse is helaas weer verdwenen. 
Waarom landuse met GoMap te lijf en niet met JOSM. 
MVG
eggie