piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
spiregrain (2026-02-10 15:21:24+00:00): Thanks mate!  The current UK Cadastrals that are easy to use in iD/JOSM have got three distinct blocks in the south of the site.   The middle one seems to be too narrow east-west, making the other two too close together.  (or something like that.
Leo Slager (2026-03-04 23:26:25+00:00): Wil je de bedrijfsgegevens voortaan toevoegen aan het reeds bestaande adres/huisnummer ?
Dat is de in nL afgesproken manier !
Leo Slager (2026-03-04 23:27:46+00:00): Beide huisnummers 8 samengevoegd.
checkron (2026-03-05 06:14:38+00:00): Hoi Leo,

Bedankt voor de info, je bent de eerste die mij dit vertelt. 

Ik gebruik OSM in CoMaps (als vervanging van Google maps) en daar wordt dit zo niet weergegeven (en ik ken het zo ook niet uit andere (commerciele) apps als HERE, Foursquare, Waze. 
In Comaps is het met de NL methode ook niet mogelijk het adres van een bedrijf/POI te veranderen bij verhuizing, omdat daarmee ook het huisnummer van het pand veranderd.

Ander nadeel: Een adres kan in Comaps niet worden aangepast, een bedrijf kan alleen als nieuwe plek worden toegevoegd.

Dus zolang de mogelijkheden in Comaps and de NL regels voor OSM niet matchen zullen er vast veel nieuwe supporters/helpers zijn die het net als mij niet correct doen.

Als we willen dat OSM aktuellere data levert en echt als alternatief voor Google maps gebruikt kan worden, dan moet het ingeven van data ook makkelijker worden zodat mensen dit ook eenvoudiger kunnen.

Nu is het heel makkelijk een fout te maken.
rskedgell (2026-02-10 10:54:28+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. And thanks for spotting this.

For gated roads, it's usually best to add a barrier=gate point to the road at its position on the road. You can then split the road (right-click, scissors icon) and add access=private to the part of the road behind the gate.

If the general access condition is private, you don't need to add access conditions for other transport modes (motor vehicle, horse, bicycle, foot) unless access is more permissive. An example of this would be a public footpath along an otherwise private road, where you would add foot=designated

Updated  in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178352760
JungleJim007 (2026-03-14 15:20:55+00:00): Hi, vraagje, ik woon in deze straat (Alkmaardermeer) en zag dat je parkeerplaatsen hebt toegevoegd. Het zijn ze alleen niet allemaal. Nu vroeg ik me dus af of je die ook gaat toe voegen? En in de wijk zijn uiteraard nog veel meer van dit soort parkeerplekken aan de straat.

Als ik op de community kijk lijkt het ook alsof dit soort parkeerplaatsen normaal gesproken niet ingetekend worden, zie https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/parkeerplaatsen-mappen/82544/3, dus ben ook wel benieuwd hoe je daar tegenaan kijkt.

Groeten, Erik
JungleJim007 (2026-03-14 15:22:40+00:00): Als aanvulling, reden dat ik dit aankaart is dat er nu in heel veel map renderers voor elk vak een P icoon getoond wordt, wat eigenlijk best wel irritant is.
jj000 (2026-03-14 15:48:21+00:00): Dat het irritant is, is geen argument waarom het niet juist is. Een parkeervak is een parkeervak. De tagging klopt precies volgens de geldende OSM richtlijnen.
JungleJim007 (2026-03-14 16:08:46+00:00): Maar waarom heb je het dan alleen voor een deel van deze straat en de wijk toegevoegd?

En heb je voor mij een linkje naar de (lokale) richtlijnen soort parkeervakken in een woonwijk gemicromapped moeten worden of niet?
jj000 (2026-03-14 17:00:56+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side
jj000 (2026-03-14 17:04:16+00:00): En je haalt een discussie van 8 jaar geleden aan waarin geen consensus is bereikt. Losse parkeervakken naast een straat mogen gewoon ingetekend worden.
JungleJim007 (2026-03-14 17:19:02+00:00): Maar dan nogmaals de vraag, waarom maar een deel van de straat doen?

Persoonlijk vind ik het weinig toevoegen, het is niet alsof anderen naar deze parkeervakken gaan navigeren.

Dat er een tag voor is wil niet zeggen dat ook alles gemicromapped hoeft te worden. Maar ik denk dat we daarover dan van mening verschillen.
jj000 (2026-03-14 17:54:33+00:00): De een vindt micromappen onnodig en de andere wel. Dat klopt. Maar beiden zijn toegestaan. Je bent vrij om iets aan te passen. Maar let wel, het is wel apart om zaken die in principe niet tegen de regels zijn aan te passen alleen omdat jezelf iets in de kaartrender niet aan staat. Maar nogmaals, het is allemaal toegestaan.
jj000 (2026-03-14 17:57:37+00:00): En mijn plan is om voor de hele buurt gemicromapt te hebben. Dus als één van je irritaties is dat maar een deel gedaan is, dan is die irritatie op termijn opgelost :)
JungleJim007 (2026-03-14 20:01:18+00:00): Nou succes dan met micromappen.

Ik ga deze specifieke vakken aan de Alkmaardermeer dan wel aanpassen want ze zijn nu niet goed ingetekend.
De kant die aan de boom zit wel, daar is een stoeprand met een ronding (het hoekje in de polygoon). Maar de andere kant is nu ook ingetekend alsof die aan een een stoeprand met een ronding zit, en dat klopt niet. Want het parkeervak loopt door in bestrating om over de stoep op de oprit van de woning te komen.
DFW-Backyard7 (2026-03-09 05:35:48+00:00): Are there 2 flocks side by side here or was it accidental duplicate? I tried to pull my dashcam footage from the last time i drove by here but it was night so couldn't tell for sure
mycota (2026-02-22 23:05:34+00:00): Thanks for mapping the pools in this area. Some of the round objects you tagged as pools appear to be trampolines. Trampolines usually have a darker appearance. If you are sure it is an aboveground pool, please tag with swimming_pool=above to make it easy to distinguish from inground pools. Also, please don't draw incorrect pool shapes. If you don't have time to draw the correct shapes, just map them as nodes. It is much harder to correct incorrect shapes after they have been drawn.
NEOK Ground Truth (2026-02-10 00:21:11+00:00): Thank you. I had this mislabeled. I have fixed the other culvert that I had labeled this way in changeset 178334656.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178333048
jtbritto (2026-03-23 11:38:28+00:00): This is incorrect, it is not East Palm Canyon past Cathedral City limits, it is ST HWY 111
Dan Bcl (2026-02-09 23:00:02+00:00): CARTE FUNCIARĂ NR. 126007 Domnesti IF geoportal
Frans S (2026-02-10 16:37:34+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178333559
VLD549 (2026-03-14 07:39:01+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. Could you provide a link of some sort that shows the name to be Deputy Bruce Lee Memorial Highway instead of Highway 111?
Thank you!
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-03-14 15:21:10+00:00): Some of these already had a tag of "alt_name= Deputy Bruce Lee [Memorial] Highway".
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-19 10:14:53+00:00): Reverted incorrect maxweightration:hgv tag (should be maxweightrating:hgv) and removed unnecessary split, merged Prescott Rd; fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78407041 #OptimoRoute
silversurfer83 (2026-02-10 08:39:35+00:00): Moin Dirk,

Ich hätte Fragen und Anmerkungen.

- Du hüpfst seit einer Weile quer über die Republik und änderst Dinge und dein Kommentar lautet immer "Anpassung". Das ist leider absolut nicht hilfreich. Bitte lies https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments und schreibe in Zukunft bessere Kommentare. Danke.

- Aus welchem Grund verpasst du allen Kleiderkammern den Namen "Bw Bekleidungsmanagement GmbH"? Als Operator kann ich das nachvollziehen, aber nicht als name=*

happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178333623
Nexinor (2026-02-10 12:15:56+00:00): Petite erreur sur les tags

correction d'une fin de voie notée sans tag 'noexit'
Frans S (2026-02-10 16:36:39+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178333778
JakovRajić (2026-02-13 14:09:38+00:00): Fixed in changeset 178506488, tags limited only to the part of the road where there are bridges.
Frans S (2026-02-10 16:33:52+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178334005
Frans S (2026-02-10 16:35:52+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178334007
Luke_Vader (2026-02-10 12:13:11+00:00): Thank you for adding these places to OSM.
But watch out, you incorrectly renamed the kebab shop. The old name was correct, just the type was wrong.
I fixed that aswel as adding more info to the places you added in changeset/178356750
mueschel (2026-02-15 11:35:16+00:00): Hi,
you used "ref:vlaanderen:onroerenderfgoed" here - is this different from the "ref:OnroerendErfgoed" used many times?
wandelzot (2026-03-05 21:29:10+00:00): "Hi mueschel, thanks for the feedback! Honestly, I wasn't aware that there was a specific community standard for the key name. I just picked the one that seemed most descriptive. Thanks for the correction and for simplifying the tags, it's good to know the preferred format now!"
wandelzot (2026-03-05 21:30:53+00:00): Oh yes, feel free to change them.
cartografy (2026-02-13 16:54:47+00:00): Source correction: Mapbox Satellite
NeisBot (2026-02-10 00:25:18+00:00): Hello Norma Rangel, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/13539089081
https://osm.org/node/13539089080
https://osm.org/node/13539089079
https://osm.org/way/1475997355

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178334677
fortera_au (2026-02-10 00:46:56+00:00): Hi, this is still incorrect, you can see where the road deviates from what you've drawn, can you please correct this. The road is visible enough through the trees to draw this accurately.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178334743
Prasanna Msamy (2026-02-10 00:58:52+00:00): Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you. Regards, Prasanna Devi
Bear4 (2026-02-12 09:25:03+00:00): Dziwna zmiana, budynek szkoły nie podpisany a napis jest na gruncie. 
Skoro budynek był podpisany to wiadomo, że to szkoła z boiskami i terenem wokoło. Dodatkowo inne zespoły szkół mają podpisy na budynkach np. II LO, Sz.p. 37. Czy wszystkie kompleksy szkolne, przedszkolne zostaną zmienione czy jest to jednorazowa zmiana?
Bear4 (2026-02-12 09:40:29+00:00): Ok. na innym zoomie były dwa dublujące się napisy. Rozumiem.
Luke_Vader (2026-02-10 11:40:50+00:00): Are you sure about the power lines way/1476000059 way/1476000060 and way/1476000061?
When looking at panoramax images on the main road, I can only spot one of these.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178335201
Adrien Kieffer (2026-02-10 17:16:08+00:00): You seem to be right, with way/1476000059 being the only one still existing. I wasn't aware of panoramax and used streetview images, which were 1 year older. Thanks.
FahRadler (2026-02-10 11:28:16+00:00): Hi,
is Gordie Howe realy in service?
Jarek 🚲 (2026-02-19 02:58:28+00:00): The bridge is not open. Corrected access tags in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178750466
FajrAl (2026-02-10 12:08:20+00:00): Selamat datang di OpenStreetMap. Perlu diketahui bahwa data di OSM bersifat publik, jadi sebaiknya jangan menambahkan data pribadi seperti nama pemilik sebuah rumah ya.
zuicz (2026-02-12 19:41:11+00:00): nazwy peronów które zmieniłeś zniknęły jeszcze tego samego dnia, moim zdaniem błędnie
np.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178468402
kylor (2026-02-10 21:33:41+00:00): very minor edit i like it
anotherToad (2026-02-12 04:31:26+00:00): what a productive multitasker
Circular Elevation (2026-02-28 04:39:05+00:00): Hi luke_unknown, your edit includes changes in both Ecuador and Canada, which results in a changeset that covers almost the entirety of North America. Please keep your edits local. It makes reviewing local edits much easier for other mappers.
Circular Elevation (2026-02-28 04:40:29+00:00): That is to say, do edits in Canada in a separate changeset, rather than including them within the same one.
FajrAl (2026-02-10 12:09:06+00:00): Selamat datang di OpenStreetMap. Perlu diketahui bahwa data di OSM bersifat publik, jadi sebaiknya jangan menambahkan data pribadi seperti nama pemilik sebuah rumah ya.
Baloo Uriza (2026-02-10 14:11:58+00:00): lanes=2 should only be used on marked lanes.  Where there's no lane markings, lane_markings=no applies instead.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178336350
NEOK Ground Truth (2026-02-10 18:34:36+00:00): Got it, thank you! I will do this in the future.
NeisBot (2026-02-10 02:30:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13539290482 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Public Fountain"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Öffentliche Brunnenanlage"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-10 05:53:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178340964
where the comment is: "Remove vandalism"
Black_Diamond (2026-05-12 06:49:30+00:00): Hi, I've reverted this changeset with changeset #182539724. The type of road depends on the capacity and road features. This is not a high speed expressway. It has uncontrolled intersections, and driveways. It is not a higher speed expressway that are like Lawrence and San Tomas. It is a continuation of the rest of Saratoga, which is also more bike friendly than Lawrence.

Lawrence does not continue. The capacity just fans out across Saratoga, and Quito.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-05-12 15:21:38+00:00): In OSM, roads are classified according to importance. The way you left things results in a stub that can be very obviously connected to the freeway nearby.
Black_Diamond (2026-05-12 19:57:18+00:00): While it connects, like many of the other roads, it is not a continuation of the county road G2. The continuation of county road G2 actually goes from Lawrence to Quito, which is even narrower and slower than either Lawrence or Saratoga. Saratoga is not a continuation of G2.

This segment of Saratoga is the same importance as the rest of Saratoga. It is not more important than the segment of Saratoga to the north.

Following your logic, you would actually be upgrading the entire section of Saratoga that connects between 280 and 85.

Saratoga has similar speed, number of lanes, and capacity as Prospect and Hamilton, Winchester, and Saratoga-Sunnyvale. I don't think "importance" is a quantifiable value, but the features of a road are quantifiable, including speed limit, lanes, bikability, and frequency of intersections.

Portions of 101 do drop from freeway  (motorway) speeds to trunk speeds when it goes through farmland and no over-crossings. That classification difference does not decrease the importance.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-05-12 20:34:27+00:00): G2 continuing onto Quito Rd instead of Saratoga Ave is not what I mean by "Connecting trunk roads." Ultimately, (for the most part) road numbers are just that: numbers. Usually, they only tell people who maintains them, not how important the road is. What I mean by "trunk stub" is that the end of the trunk road does not connect to a trunk road or higher. Meanwhile, SR 85 forms a partial beltway around the San Jose metro area, so it seems like the most obvious place to continue this trunk road would be onto Saratoga Ave toward SR 85. I hope this makes sense.
Black_Diamond (2026-05-12 23:39:32+00:00): Have you actually driven or biked this road? Saratoga Ave is definitely not a part of a beltway or a trunk. That's what the expressways and freeways are for. Parts of Saratoga Ave have been purposefully narrowed to decrease the traffic speed and improve the accessibility to bikes.

By increasing it to the same categorization as an expressway, you're implying that it's inappropriate for bikes by default. It is a recognized bike route in the county.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-05-13 00:27:08+00:00): None of those characteristics describe a trunk road (highway=trunk). To tag what you just said, you can use bicycle=designated, lcn_ref=*, expressway=no, maxspeed=*, and narrow=yes. The only purpose of upgrading this specific segment of Saratoga Ave to highway=trunk is to connect the trunk road at G2 to SR 85.
Black_Diamond (2026-05-13 01:40:19+00:00): Let me put it another way, why do you think that the people driving on Lawrence want to go to 85, and vis versa? Your bias is assuming that there is a link between the 2 roads.

Based on observed traffic in the area, I'd say that the Westgate complex is the actual destination. Large amounts of traffic coming from or to Quito are actually attending Prospect High School, Apple, Kaiser, or Nvidia. People using 85 in the area are typically going to use Cox, and use the southern part of Saratoga Ave without touching Lawrence. If you're on 85, you normally don't switch to the slower Lawrence Expy, unless traffic is blocked. You normally only take Saratoga Ave if you're going to the Westgate mall area, like to see a movie.

I say that there is a weak connection and continuation of traffic between 85 and Lawrence. The traffic isn't passing through the area. It's local traffic.
literan (2026-02-11 19:45:55+00:00): дом гораздо больше, имеет более сложную форму. Это явная халтура. Пожалуйста, перерисуйте
Ozon OSM10 (2026-02-12 18:45:09+00:00): Здравствуйте, изините, ошибку уже исправила.
NeisBot (2026-02-10 03:45:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12026908259 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bitcoin ATM"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-18 05:34:51+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178708553
(No visible changes after review)
FajrAl (2026-02-10 12:08:27+00:00): Selamat datang di OpenStreetMap. Perlu diketahui bahwa data di OSM bersifat publik, jadi sebaiknya jangan menambahkan data pribadi seperti nama pemilik sebuah rumah ya.
NeisBot (2026-02-10 04:33:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13539472198 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Plumbing service"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-18 05:34:54+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178708556
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
Baloo Uriza (2026-02-10 14:09:46+00:00): This parking lot is a little overzealous and includes a lot of things that aren't parking.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178339313
vectorial8192 (2026-02-10 05:06:06+00:00): info: there is a South Asian (Pakistani?) community here. what probably happens is that during some hours, some of the folks would lay out some shops (usually at Pei Ho Street due to low traffic) and sell homemade stuff and chat among themselves. doesn't feel like a real tourist attraction.
Kovoschiz (2026-02-10 07:01:04+00:00): It could be acceptable if it exists regularly for some years. `=marketplace` + `informal=yes` may be used.