piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Dimacn (2023-11-28 08:09:08+00:00): Правильно: переулок Фурманова. Пожалуйста почитайте Соглашение о наименовании улиц в OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог
GSF1200S (2023-11-28 08:50:21+00:00): Bad revertion, again.
GSF1200S (2023-11-28 08:51:10+00:00): bad reversion
Kovoschiz (2023-11-28 16:18:04+00:00): And you are notorious for accusing others without responding to them.
GSF1200S (2023-12-02 08:28:54+00:00): So, what's the point of adding false info in OSM?
GSF1200S (2023-12-02 08:44:07+00:00): No evidence of a road being constructed yet in this araa. In case you are not aware of when to use highway=construction

Wiki: Major construction projects typically several years to complete. Use this key to denote active construction roadworks. For projects being planned, where there is little or no evidence for them on the ground, avoid tagging them or use proposed=* instead.
Kovoschiz (2023-12-03 22:18:09+00:00): 1. Are you aware I'm not the one who has used `highway=construction` ? 
2. Then you should be the one who change it `proposed:highway=` . That's irrelevant to you wrongly removing `name=` , `lanes=`, and `sidewalk=` .
Kovoschiz (2023-12-03 22:22:52+00:00): Stop accusing others of things like "obsession and imagination". I already explained to you why the project description didn't say extension. By your logic, no other roads should be named until gazetted and opened. This obviously runs counter to how `=construction` is used.
Kovoschiz (2023-12-03 22:51:22+00:00): 38e. "The alignment of Nin Fung Road extension through the knoll would impact these
fung shui sites and the villagers’ customs and traditions" https://www.tpb.gov.hk/en/meetings/TPB/Minutes/m1249tpb_e1.pdf#page=54

36a. "Nin Fung Road would be
extended to connect the proposed new access road which would be the
access for Sites A and B1."  https://www.tpb.gov.hk/en/meetings/TPB/Minutes/m1249tpb_e2.pdf#page=40

1.4.2. "Resumption of some private lands within Village Environ Boundary (VEB) might be
required to extend the Nin Fung Road for traffic connection to Site 1.  "  p.2 https://www.pland.gov.hk/pland_en/info_serv/ava_register/ProjInfo/AVRG159_ExpReport.pdf#page=6
redd (2023-12-04 21:31:54+00:00): Hallo geozeisig,
das sieht aus wie ein automatisierter Edit. Falls das stimmt hast du bei automatisiert das bin=no zu bin=yes geändert. Das waste_basket=yes könnte in diesem Fall schlicht veraltet gewesen sein.  Auf jeden Fall widersprüchlich zu bin=no.

Bitte unterlasse solch automatisierte Edits und verändere nur Werte an Orten die du kennst oder überprüfen kannst z.B. Luft/Strassenbilder.

Ich würde dich bitten, diesen Änderungssatz noch einmal zu reviewen und gegebenfalls zu revidieren.

Vielen Dank,

redd
geozeisig (2023-12-05 07:10:59+00:00): Hallo,
habe den Datensatz noch mal korrigiert, für den Fall das waste_basket und bin widersprüchlich waren. Ich den Fall habe ich bin den Vorrang, wie vorgeschlagen gegeben.
Danke für den Hinweis
redd (2023-12-07 16:20:59+00:00): danke für die schnelle Reaktion!
flohoff (2023-11-28 10:39:10+00:00): Moin,
weil ich zufällig diesen changeset gesehen habe.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27692161

bicycle=yes + vehicle=destination? 

Wie ist das denn beschildert? Sicher das da kein Z260 steht und das eigentlich ein motor_vehicle=destination ist?

Da steht ein Z250 + Anlieger frei + Fahrrad frei?

Flo
thetornado76 (2023-11-28 10:52:40+00:00): Hallo Flo,
Hier https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=316464899824542&lat=51.514888903701376&lng=8.456226000000015&z=1.5&focus=photo kann man erkennen, dass dort ein Z250 mit Anlieger und Fahrrad frei steht
Gruß Daniel
flohoff (2023-11-28 11:07:54+00:00): Krass - das hab ich auch noch nicht gesehen - Unfassbar - anstatt ein Z260 + Anliefer Frei hinzuhängen. 

Verkehrsbehörden *soifz*
Myazyk (2023-12-09 13:26:21+00:00): Відділення Ощадбанку по вул. Грушевського, 170 закрите уже зо два роки тому
Getpin_Com (2024-03-11 19:33:14+00:00):   Дякую за інформацію.
MxxCon (2023-11-28 23:20:08+00:00): This feature has been mapped here for over 6 years now. Why did you feel that you need to create a duplicate entry?
Duplicate will be deleted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144537283
Polarbear (2023-11-29 23:13:17+00:00): Hi huozhe,
was ich bei der Aktion nicht verstehe ist, warum du das Objekt mit dem lifecycle-Tag des Bauzustands gelöscht und es dann als neu wieder eingezeichnet hast. 
Eine Quelle für die Geometrie hast du auch nicht angegeben, denn auf den Bildern vom April 2023 ist ja noch Sand.
Polarbear (2023-11-29 23:20:16+00:00): Objekthistorie restauriert.
Polarbear (2023-11-30 12:59:01+00:00): Auf den Visualisierungen zum Projekt ist auch ein Gebäude zu sehen. Steht das schon? Ist es das südöstlich des Fussballplatzes? Das ist zumindest neu und ohne spezifisches Tagging.
Aber das gehört doch dann auch zum Sportzentrum, oder?
Polarbear (2023-11-30 13:01:57+00:00): Wenn das ein religiöses Gemeindezentrum ist, solltest du amenity=community_centre verwenden.
Wenn es nur das Büro ist, dann office.
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2024-01-24 19:20:36+00:00): A posunuta adresa Píškova 6 do křížení příjezdové cesty u Böhmova 2 a TS4490, co? Já ho vrátím zpět na místo, ovšem se takové omyly stávají, už se mi to taky stalo několikrát.
SafwatHalaby (2025-04-16 13:03:25+00:00): Hello. This edit seems to have added "mtb:name" on a path which previously didn't have that name: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1125886400

Is this an error?
SafwatHalaby (2025-04-16 13:03:56+00:00): Correcting my own comment: his edit seems to have added "mtb:name" on a path which previously didn't have an mtb marking. Is this an error?
SafwatHalaby (2025-04-16 13:10:04+00:00): Possibly relevant: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152454545
zstadler (2025-04-17 14:52:43+00:00): way 1125886400 had a name in version 1

See https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/1125886400
maraf24 (2023-11-29 12:22:04+00:00): Geoportal to nie jest dobre źródło, ma błędy i jest nieaktualny.
Poza tym w OSM rzadko mapujemy rzeczy pod ziemią, bo to nie jest weryfikowalne.
Cebderby (2023-11-28 15:54:19+00:00): Modification annulée - route en double ajoutée.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144539042
Cebderby (2023-11-28 15:53:00+00:00): Modification annulée - route en double ajoutée.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144539096
mcliquid (2023-11-28 09:49:13+00:00): Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
fkraemer (2023-11-28 11:16:28+00:00): Sure, that thing slipped in by accident. Have a fine day too!
Metzor (2023-11-28 12:28:01+00:00): Hi fkraemer,

Is there really two fifferent bakeries?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11381038406#map=19/47.28211/7.05169

Ifnot please delete the additional one if yours again. Thanks.

Metzor
fkraemer (2023-11-28 12:54:10+00:00): You're right. I deleted it.

The other one was added 7months ago. I guess, my offline map was outdated at the time of adding the duplicate.
Metzor (2023-11-28 15:13:02+00:00): Thanks! 
Maybe Osmand should have issued a warning...
silversurfer83 (2023-11-28 17:01:36+00:00): Hi :)

please make sure not to add duplicate information to the OpenStreetMap database. An other user already removed these two objects since were double entries.

The app maps.me is able to edit the OSM database so you should be careful with the information you're adding. If you wish to simply safe your personal favorites, please use a different feature of the app.

If you wish to help with the database there's different apps. Should you have any questions, please reach out. We're happy to help.

cheers
silversurfer83
Filip009 (2023-11-29 13:24:00+00:00): Dobrý deň, prečo ste odstránil danú cestu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1214123721?
slonique (2023-11-29 13:42:44+00:00): Zdravim,
Pretože to nie je cesta, ale súkromný vjazd do podzemnej garáže, ktorý začína na hranici existujúcej cesty
Filip009 (2023-11-29 13:47:44+00:00): Okej, tak tomu treba pridať access=private (Vjazd/vstup povolený -> Všetci - private), ale keď tam cesta je, tak by v mape mala ostať.
aceman444 (2025-12-30 23:48:38+00:00): Presne tak, vratil som to naspat.
Cebderby (2023-11-28 15:51:31+00:00): Modification annulée - route en double ajoutée.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144540387
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-28 09:50:26+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180728964

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Cebderby (2023-11-28 15:49:11+00:00): Modification annulée - route en double ajoutés.
Un nœud déplacé hors de sa position est également réparé.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144540695
Beeperz (2023-11-28 09:56:23+00:00): Mistake, please delete! Thanx.
whb (2023-11-28 10:48:04+00:00): Deleted due to request:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144543217
lenny32 (2023-12-20 18:45:14+00:00): what does your modifier mean? When I go there, there's no water; and what does the name "water full" mean? 

à quoi correspond votre modif, quand j'y vais il n'y a pas d'eau ; et que veut dire un nom "water full" ?
Britzz (2023-12-28 23:24:07+00:00): Pourquoi ajouter "height=0" sur le building (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/998226620) ? Cela me semble faux puisque la station de métro a bien une hauteur et les hauteurs sont indiquées sur les building:part.
Cebderby (2023-11-28 15:41:26+00:00): Modification annulée – itinéraires en double ajoutés
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144541221
arctic-rocinante (2024-03-09 12:13:32+00:00): Hello, I’m not 100% sure but I think this changeset may have accidentally connected an underground footway with a surface-level sidewalk.

In particular, I’m pretty sure the eastern end of these escalators…
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1072473008#map=19/-33.87469/151.22254

…should connect to the underground platform, rather than the sidewalk. In OSMCha it looks like this might have been mapped correctly before this changeset.
Lockstar (2024-03-09 23:41:04+00:00): Thanks - I've checked this and I don't think it was my changeset that added the incorrect connection from the escalators to the street sidewalk.  I've fixed the error anyway and have removed the connections from the station platform escalators to the street
arctic-rocinante (2024-03-10 01:11:07+00:00): Ah okay, sorry it was probably a different changeset then. Thanks for fixing it regardless! :)

I've made a small followup edit as well to make the ends of the platform more consistent with each other. Looks a little messy visually, but I think the connections+levels+layers are all correct 🤞
Dodko (2023-12-01 20:22:42+00:00): Obec nemá ulice, addr:street sa nevyplní ale 
addr:place=Nižné Matiašovce
infeeeee (2023-11-28 12:57:21+00:00): Hello!

Why did you deleted the wiki tags?
saldenisov (2023-11-28 13:17:25+00:00): The reason is that without deleting it, I do not know how to update the name of the prison according to the official website.  I use OpenStreetMap for searching geo positions of worlds' prisons"https://www.kaggle.com/code/saldenisov/prisons-in-hungary/notebook".
infeeeee (2023-11-28 13:23:16+00:00): It says the source is a private dataset, do you have permission to publish it under ODbL?
infeeeee (2023-11-28 13:39:06+00:00): And to change the name, it clearly says, you have to change the wikidata page. 

You can overwrite the name without messing up other tags, if you scroll down a bit under "Tags" in iD, the editor you use.

But I think these names should go to official_name tag instead. Common people not necessarily call them this way: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:official_name

Do you speak Hungarian?
saldenisov (2023-12-05 19:18:09+00:00): Thanks for info about Wikidata page and official tag. Next time if necessary I will update official name
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-11-30 06:05:29+00:00): Hi Linh,

Your relation is have some kind of errors. "relation with multiple restriction values" If you want to put a time-based turn restriction then remove "restriction = no_left_turn" and keep only "restriction:conditional = no_left_turn @ (06:00-09:00,16:00-19:00)".

Please refers to guide from Mapbox. https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/adding-turn-restrictions/

One more thing to note is no_left_turn is different than no_u_turn. Car can not make a left turn to from Cộng Hòa to Út Tịch (06:00-09:00,16:00-19:00) but it can make a u turn to Cộng Hòa (towards Hoàng Văn Thụ) any time. Please correct me if the city Transport Department has put a new NO_U_TURN traffic signs here. 

You can capture your internal KartaView images and upload via Imgur.com and then paste the link to your changeset comment.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-11-30 06:06:23+00:00): One more thing.

There is another turn restriction here and I think it's correct in terms of both directions, members and tagging guideline. Why do you put a new one here?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16618581
infeeeee (2023-11-28 13:43:11+00:00): This was already mapped: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8180339

I will revert this changeset
saldenisov (2023-12-05 19:18:34+00:00): no problem, you are right
homer__simpsons (2026-04-05 21:28:07+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez ajouté "network:wikidata" à la relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6682809/history/90 sur ce changeset. Était-ce volontaire ? Il y avait un "not:nertwork:wikidata" qui avait été ajouté avec https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6682809/history/83
mga_geo (2026-04-06 06:03:56+00:00): Bonjour,
Oui, c'était volontaire.
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3480422 correspond bien au réseau Star de Rennes métropole.
Je ne sais pas pourquoi Philippe a passé en no cet attribut.
Marc
homer__simpsons (2026-04-06 13:02:44+00:00): Merci de la confirmation, j'ai donc retiré les not:network:wikidata avec ce changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180945555
infeeeee (2023-11-28 13:48:38+00:00): Hello!

The exact same text was written in the official_name, I will revert this as well.
saldenisov (2023-12-05 19:18:54+00:00): sorry. you are right
bxl-forever (2024-07-13 20:59:51+00:00): In dat geval, "source:maxspeed=BE-VLG:urban" is fout want dit is de tag voor 50 km/u.

Welke borden hier: zone 30 of C43 met "30"?
Remko_G (2024-07-14 08:23:14+00:00): Hier geldt C43 met 30
Remko_G (2024-07-14 08:25:47+00:00): Waarschijnlijk staat dit bij Gelmelstraat (251563159) dan ook verkeerd.
dadavid (2026-03-31 12:12:04+00:00): Hi Bojan, you added a ford here, but that seems like a typo. can you double-check? :) Cheers

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/917808652
BojanKras (2026-03-31 12:25:28+00:00): That was surely a mistake. I really don't know why. Thank you.
empty_child (2023-11-28 11:55:26+00:00): Добрый день
Судя по спутнику, я бы сказал, что это все-таки service (или living_street, если имеется соответствующий знак)
Syl (2023-11-28 13:21:36+00:00): Salut, les caméras ont l'air d'être accrochées aux murs mais pas dans les murs. C'est ok si je modifie en remettant les coins ?
Monsieur_J (2023-11-28 14:49:26+00:00): Je les ai justement raccroché aux coins, non ?
Syl (2023-11-28 15:55:31+00:00): Tu as fusionné les deux.
Mais les caméras sont un peu décalés des coins du mur, elles ne sont pas exactement au même endroit. Comme ce sont deux choses différentes ça me parait pertinent que soit deux objets différents. Et il n'y a pas besoin qu'elles fassent partie du bâtiment.
Monsieur_J (2023-11-29 10:26:37+00:00): C'est ce que j'avais fais lors de la création, mais suite à une discussion avec Edie, je l'ai attaché au coin du bâtiment car ce serait la bonne pratique
Syl (2023-11-29 23:23:56+00:00): Je n'ai pas trouvé d'endroit qui conseil de faire d'un manière ou d'une autre dans ce cas. Je laisse comme ça, on en rediscutera.
vicente lopez 2021 (2023-12-01 02:20:24+00:00): se habilita mañana la autovia de punilla
wolfgang8 (2023-11-30 09:50:41+00:00): Hallo,

ich hab bemerkt, dass du bei einem Feldweg in der Nähe von Waizendorf eine Fahrradstraße als "highway=residential" eingetragen hast:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29301999
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88383054

Üblicherweise wird "highway=residential" nur innerhalb von Ortsgebieten verwendet - siehe dazu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dresidential

Vielleicht wäre ein anderer highway-Typ (path, track, service,...) dafür passender?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle_road%3Dyes
PlayGuide (2023-12-31 11:23:34+00:00): Bonjour,
Pour la cour de l'école il faut utiliser le tag leisure=schoolyard
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:leisure%3Dschoolyard 
Le tag amenity=school désigne lui la totalité de l'enclave de l'école et doit être complété avec d'autres infos, notamment le numéro UAI.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dschool
arjunaraoc (2024-01-02 08:39:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my update to fix minor issues: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145788478

Happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144545187
map per (2023-11-29 19:06:01+00:00): As you asked for a review:
This edit looks good, thanks!
george1201 (2023-12-02 23:04:50+00:00): Wer bei uns im Kreisverkehr so fährt, wie die Uhr läuft, der wird zum Geisterfahrer :-). Ich habe direction entfernt.
MxxCon (2023-11-28 23:30:47+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you modify this geometry?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144546050
MxxCon (2023-11-28 23:31:24+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you modify this geometry?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144546116
ToniE (2023-11-28 13:26:17+00:00): Hallo Severin,

willkommen bei OSM.

Den Weg, so quer über die Straße hinweg gibt es aber wohl nicht, bzw. der Übergang (mit Ampel) ist ja schon bereits eingetragen.

Zudem endet Dein Weg rechts nicht am anderen Weg, sondern an der Landfläche https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/949120861

Ich werde den Weg wieder löschen, da redundant und so wie hier gemapped wohl auch nicht existent.

Gruß
Toni
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-28 12:20:37+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11381300251

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
zorglubu (2023-11-30 09:42:41+00:00): Bonjour,

Par courtoisie, il est recommandé sur OSM de mettre un commentaire lors de vos modifications. Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications#Pourquoi_devrais-je_utiliser_les_commentaires_de_Changeset_?

Ce commentaire pourrait ici être simplement  "ajout table".
Merci par avance, et bonne cartographie :-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144546545
mapboy63 (2023-11-28 16:02:42+00:00): addr:housename=United Kingdom?
@lakendrickriaquailrahlequah (2023-11-28 12:20:51+00:00): The line from Menoken to Denver was owned by the MoPac
Jordi MF (2023-11-28 20:01:33+00:00): Gràcies Amy,
Em vaig equivocar a l'afegir els noms traduïts i vaig mesclar els idiomes...
Aleksander Hugo (2023-11-30 11:47:47+00:00): Czy Trasa Górna zasługuje na "primary"? To będzie jedynie droga wojewódzka i to o dość niskich parametrach, więc nie rozumiem czemu ma być oznaczona inaczej niż np DW710 czy DW713
szalona_entropia (2023-11-30 12:12:59+00:00): To już prędzej DW713 powinna być primary, a nie Trasa Górna.
user_5359 (2023-11-28 15:46:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys). Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org!
If you need help, You are welcome!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-28 12:40:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11381295942

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bxl-forever (2023-11-29 11:24:00+00:00): /Hello,

Even if the content of your change is fine (i.e. renaming "Wetterse steenweg" into "Wetterse Steenweg" to fix a capitalisation issue), your changeset title is unnecessarily offensive.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330587982/history

"Profanity" or "Vandalism" are very strong accusations towards other mappers.  I advise you to think about the way you write your changeset titles.  User @Jakka is one of the most active contributors in this country and is probably the one who helps the most to keep OSM data clean.

Please use those words for *real* cases of vandalism.  Doing a minor capitalisation error can happen to anyone.  It is good if you see it and fix it; next time just write "typo fix" or anything like that in the changeset title.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Have a nice day.
MikiDi (2023-12-09 21:57:37+00:00): Please note that "Wetterse steenweg" is the official streetname according to our government sources. See the "Digitaal Vlaanderen GRB" layer in id. Please provide ("on the ground") sources for your edit (mapillary?) if you think this government data might be incorrect.
VLD548 (2023-12-13 16:48:47+00:00): Thank you for the contribution. I agree with the name "Wetterse steenweg".
eggie (2023-11-29 10:36:20+00:00): Het ziet er wellicht onlogisch uit, maar het was goed gemapt door de voorgaande mapper.
Wanneer er geen fysieke afscheiding is danook geen aparte rijbanen. Je kunt immers over de verfstrepen heenrijden.
Mapper A67 A67 had het dus goed getagd door de splitsing sichtre bij de rotonde te leggen. 


https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144548348

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-12-09 17:04:37+00:00): De wegdelen heb ik teruggelegd. Je hebt niet meer gereageerd.
MVG
eggie
Hufkratzer (2023-11-28 16:29:42+00:00): Hi,
die Flächen, die du hier mit leisure=horse_riding getaggt hast, sind keine centres équestres. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227350454 ist vermutlich ein Reitplatz, der a
dann mit leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian zu taggen wäre (was du ja in ähnlichen Fällen bisher auch gemacht hast).  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227350452 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227350453 könnten Flächen für die Haltung von Pferden sein (Paddocks, landuse=animal_keeping).
Vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Équitation