piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2023-02-18 09:17:50+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Maping of tall (high buildings.  

mapping of tall buildings is different from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the roof lines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the roof lines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

Best regards.
Frans S (2023-02-18 09:26:07+00:00): Maping of tall (high) buildings.  


mapping of tall buildings is different from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the roof lines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the roof lines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

Best regards.
Harfeur (2023-02-20 07:49:22+00:00): Bonjour ! Attention à bien vérifier les modifications ! Vous avez déplacé une route sans vous en rendre compte.

J'ai annulé cette modification de la route ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132777231

(J'ai laissé le vétérinaire)

~Harfeur
Max-Kritic (2023-03-12 14:06:20+00:00): C'est sûr ?

https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Sand
michel60 (2023-03-12 18:43:15+00:00): Rien n'est sûr ...
Voir : https://bano.openstreetmap.fr/pifometre/index.html#insee=60471&tab=1
El les erreurs sur les noms des rues avec:
https://tile.openstreetmap.fr/~cquest/leaflet/bano.html#17/49.57112/2.97458
michel60 (2023-03-12 18:48:29+00:00): Sinon, il y a aussi les panneaux des noms de la rue, mais pas pour celle-ci, je n'ai pas vu de panneau.
Max-Kritic (2023-03-13 13:40:48+00:00): Il est bien indiqué "AV GEORGE SAND" dans la colonne FANTOIR. Pour moi, c'est cette valeur qui prime. D'autant plus qu'il n'y a boite postal sur cette "avenue" et qu'aucune adresse n'est certifiée pour Noyon sur  https://bano.openstreetmap.fr/pifometre/index.html#insee=60471&tab=1

La Bano n'est pas fiable. Donc tu peux enlever le s par respect pour l'auteur.
michel60 (2023-03-13 13:50:52+00:00): Bonc ok, je le fais
MxxCon (2023-02-17 16:39:25+00:00): There's no need to have such a giant bbox to update just 5 things. Please split up your changeset into smaller geographical areas.
Something B (2023-02-17 16:43:12+00:00): It was by accident.
Regards, 
Something B.
emersonveenstra (2023-03-03 17:19:24+00:00): Hi,

This changeset duplicated dozens of traffic lights. There's too many to list here, but you can see the map overview at https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=14&lat=48.39343&lon=-97.73792&item=1230&level=1,2,3&tags=&fixable=&username=&source=&class=3

Every one of those pins is a duplicated node from this changeset, please fix this, thanks!
emersonveenstra (2023-03-03 17:19:41+00:00): *street lamps, not traffic lights, sorry
Frans S (2023-02-18 09:30:35+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
Mapping of tall (high) buildings.  

mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the roof lines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the roof lines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

Best regards.
sonntagn (2023-02-18 10:28:58+00:00): Hello. This was very helpful, thank you!

Best.
Frans S (2023-02-25 16:26:55+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Each rectangular building need to be squared. !!  Q key when still selected. You hardly squared a building.
Nodes of buildings may not connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.





Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132679322
gscscnd (2023-02-17 17:14:09+00:00): <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286813626>: usunąłeś informację o tym, że to jest budynek (building=*), a pozostawiłeś informację o tym, że to jest sklep mięsny. Zakładając, że miało być na odwrót, poprawiłem: <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132686897>.
gscscnd (2023-02-17 17:11:20+00:00): 1. Geoportal sugeruje, że dotychczasowe oznaczenie punktów adresowych 52 i 54 było poprawne.
2. Do kancelarii należy dodać jakiś tag mówiący, że to jest kancelaria, zobacz: <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office>.
gscholz (2023-02-21 07:01:20+00:00): Hi abebayehuz,
this changeset has added several errors to the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways. The added line also does not have any meaning for the map itself, can you please fix this?

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132682098

You may like to educate yourself about how to handle personal gps tracks here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Convert_GPS_tracks

You can find information about how to write changeset comments properly here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind regards
Guido
colargol (2023-02-19 20:42:59+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour votre contribution, vos précisions "museum=history" et "operator:type=public" sont bienvenues mais les autres posent problème :

- pourquoi avez vous supprimé le tag "wikidata=Q2389498" ? Bien que non affichée c'est une information importante pour faire le lien entre OpenStreetMap et les projets Wikimedia (Wikipedia, Commons). En général il faut y réfléchir à deux fois avant de supprimer des informations dans OpenStreetMap. 

- dans le tag wikipedia vous avez changé le nom de la page wikipedia de "fr:Musée de la Révolution française" en "fr:Domaine de Vizille - Musée de la Révolution française"  mais la page https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domaine_de_Vizille_-_Mus%C3%A9e_de_la_R%C3%A9volution_fran%C3%A7aise n'existe pas.

Je vous laisse corriger ces deux points (je peux m'en charger si vous voulez).

Je suis l'un des animateurs du groupe local OpenStreetMap de Grenoble, je vous signale que nous organisons un atelier d'initiation le lundi 20 mars à 19h (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Grenoble_groupe_local/Agenda ) mais vu l'horaire je ne sais pas si vous pourrez y assister. N'hésitez pas à me recontacter si vous avez besoin de précisions supplémentaires (https://www.openstreetmap.org/message/new/colargol ). 

Cordialement,

Jérôme
koostelno (2023-03-12 07:35:13+00:00): Moin, Diagro 1982, bitte nimm' dringen Kontakt zu nde Koordinatoren des Elberadwegs auf! Vielen Dank!
Diagro1982 (2023-03-12 12:03:56+00:00): Hi! Hast du Kontaktdaten? Allerdings weiß ich auch nicht wiedo die D-Route 10 nicht mit dem bisherigem Elberadweg identisch ist (eine Streckenabschnitte sind gleich, einige nicht wie z.B. gleich der Anfang in Cuxhaven). Wenn das die Kernfareg ist dann, müssten die Koordinatoren des Elberadweges auf das Bundeamt für Logistik und Mobilität zugehen, die hinter den D-Routen stecken (siehe hier: https://www.komoot.de/collection/1928660/radnetz-deutschland-mit-dem-rad-auf-den-d-routen-quer-durch-das-ganze-land )
koostelno (2023-03-13 13:31:26+00:00): Hi, vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung! Ich bleib' dran, danke für den komoot-Hinweis!
koostelno (2023-03-13 13:50:57+00:00): Hi Diagro, kannst du mich über die Webseite des Elberadwegs kontakten, im Footer findest du meine Kontakdaten für den Norden ..., danke!
SomeoneElse (2023-04-19 13:05:01+00:00): Hello,
The changeset comment here was just "fixing notes".  What was the relevant note, and what information did you have that suggested that you could trust it (such as, for example, being added by a trusted contributor in the local area)?
Best Regards,
Andy
Frans S (2023-02-24 12:43:01+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Each rectangular building need to be squared. !! 
You missed a lot of them.
Nodes of buildings may not connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.





Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132681324
Crsi (2023-02-17 15:39:26+00:00): Hello Rev1k,
it looks like you have changed two distinct things in two different areas of Europe. It's usually better to split such changes into two separate changesets for better usability by other users (e.g. for review) [1]. Thank you for your contributions.
Kind regards, Crsi

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Frans S (2023-02-18 09:32:43+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
Mapping of tall (high) buildings.  

mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the roof lines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the roof lines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

Please square each rectangular building with the Q key.

Best regards.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 11:42:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10673756394/history - is it place where you cal leave edible food?

or place for leaving compostable trash?
waterproof_19m (2025-04-29 07:24:57+00:00): A community pantry that aims to save edible food from ending up in the trash and deliver it to the eaters.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/raplatoiduringluskapp/
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 15:09:55+00:00): so https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%253Dfood_sharing ?
Frans S (2023-03-04 17:15:54+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132681704
Leo Slager (2023-02-18 15:20:34+00:00): De zoveelste fout met éénrichtingsverkeer op een tweerichtings weg.
A67-A67 (2023-02-18 19:30:20+00:00): Graag gedaan...
Grass-snake (2023-02-17 15:14:52+00:00): Извините, опять забыл поменять комментарий к пакету правок, это Церковь Николая Чудотворца
peculiar theater (2023-02-20 21:32:22+00:00): Please don't add descriptive names unless that is actually the object's name. Take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
gscholz (2023-02-21 07:00:14+00:00): Hi abebayehuz,
this changeset has added several errors to the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes. The added line also does not have any meaning for the map itself, can you please fix this?

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132682098

You may like to educate yourself about how to handle personal gps tracks here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Convert_GPS_tracks

You can find information about how to write changeset comments properly here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind regards
Guido
user_18305684 (2023-02-18 14:16:29+00:00): I can see that you continue with bad roles : please stop that immediately or I will signal you for vandalism and you will be block.

Please fix your work.
Frans S (2023-02-18 09:19:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project
Mapping of tall (high buildings.  


mapping of tall buildings is different from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the roof lines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the roof lines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

Best regards.
plantico (2023-02-19 20:44:06+00:00): Hi,
vielen Dank für deine Eintragung! :)
Ich habe mal für die jeweiligen Straßen noch die tags sidewalk:...=seperate hinzugefügt (Changeset #132764717), damit die Gehwege nicht doppelt erfasst sind. Hier der entsprechende Wiki-Eintrag:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk?uselang=en

Es wäre super, wenn du die Tags künftig bei einer Eintragung von seperaten Fußwegen mit setzen könntest :)

Schöne Grüße!
tadwohlrapp (2023-02-19 21:06:00+00:00): Oh, vielen Dank für den Hinweis und die Ergänzung deinerseits! Dank dir weiß ich nun Bescheid und werde in Zukunft die Tags für die begehwegten Straßen setzen. Auch werd ich nochmal meine neu gezeichneten Bürgersteige der letzten Tage durchgehen und die Straßen nachträglich taggen. Viele Grüße!
emersonveenstra (2023-02-17 15:47:56+00:00): Sigh. Reverting, reporting to the DWG for vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132671033 for context
Frans S (2023-02-24 14:19:50+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
Please do not cluster a number of buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually>
Best regards and keep mapping
eggie (2023-02-17 17:51:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
jbfournot (2023-02-17 20:05:00+00:00): Merci beaucoup pour l'ajout ! J'ai vu passé très peu d'informations sur internet concernant cette nouvelle voie.
Mike_citadin (2023-03-09 15:02:19+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour l'ajout vous avez dû y passer du temps. Cependant je pense qu'une carte doit représenter le présent et non le futur. Cela risque de perdre des cyclotouristes qui vont aller chercher un itinéraire là où il n'existe pas encore. 

Je sais que vous l'avez mis en état "proposed" mais les fonds de cartes l'affichent ne font pas la différence.

PS: ce n'est pas correct à Corre. Le projet est rive est du canal en continuité directe de la voie existante.
jbfournot (2023-03-09 15:16:16+00:00): En complément, le way 164527479 est bon (il y a bien une nouvelle piste cyclable), mais il faut revenir au tracé d'origine de la relation 15483778 (la V50). Est-ce que vous voulez faire la modification Claude70170 ?
Claude70170 (2023-03-09 15:58:20+00:00): La partie que j'ai modifiée (uniquement entre Port sur Saône et Conflandey) existe bel et bien.
Je l'ai reliée à l'existant pour qu'elle soit utilisable par les créateurs de parcours.
Je ne suis pas le créateur des parties concernant le futur tracé de la V50, et je ne suis pas intervenu au niveau de Corre.
Je prends toujours soin de ne tracer que des portions que j'ai effectivement parcourues.
Je pense que mon nom apparait parce que j'ai connecté la nouvelle piste cyclable à la D20 à la sortie de Port/Saône et que celle-ci a été définie prématurément par quelqu'un "La Voie Bleue, Moselle-Saône à vélo".
jbfournot (2023-03-09 16:15:57+00:00): Aucun problème, c'est vrai que ça arrive souvent d'être associé à d'anciennes erreurs quand on touche à un élément lié.
Est-ce que ça vous convient si on supprime la relation 15483778 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15483778#map=12/47.8128/5.9954&layers=C) ?
Cela n'affectera pas la relation 14317692 qui est le vrai tracé actuel.
Claude70170 (2023-03-09 16:28:01+00:00): Oui, bien sûr, je vous laisse faire, je pense que vous maîtrisez bien mieux que moi :)
Mike_citadin (2023-03-09 18:39:59+00:00): ah pardon ce n'est pas vous exact mille excuses.
k2101 (2023-02-18 09:04:27+00:00): Przypomnę, że nie zawsze Geoportal jest najlepszym źródłem. Budowy jednego z dodanych przez Ciebie budynków jeszcze nie rozpoczęto. Jeśli chodzi o pozostałe, tutaj będę się przyglądał.
B_KSL (2023-02-18 14:55:59+00:00): Nie zawsze jest, to prawda, w pełni się zgadzam. Coś czego nie ma powinno zniknąć również z mapy. Dlatego przyglądaj się dalej. I jeśli wiesz, że budowy nie ma to usuwaj albo po prostu daj znać o który konkretnie budynek chodzi to ja usunę.
gscholz (2023-02-21 06:57:19+00:00): Hi abebayehuz,
this changeset has added several errors to the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes. The added line also does not have any meaning for the map itself, can you please fix this?

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132683344

You may like to educate yourself about how to handle personal gps tracks here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Convert_GPS_tracks

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-02-21 06:58:57+00:00): Btw. you can find information about how to write  changeset comments properly here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Frans S (2023-02-18 09:40:53+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
Mapping of tall (high) buildings.  

mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the roof lines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the roof lines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

Best regards.
AwoowoArne (2023-02-18 10:26:24+00:00): Thanks for your advice. Yes, I try to map the footprint but may be in some cases I didn't see it very well. 
Btw, thank you also for your validation work.
Best,
Arne
Shaun das Schaf (2023-02-17 20:37:15+00:00): Hallo Steffen,

ich weiss nicht, nach was genau du gesucht hast, aber ich finde die JVA mit Overpass Turbo: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1rtt

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37392144 war bereits korrekt mit amenity=prison getaggt (seit 12 Jahren).
Somit braucht es das von dir getaggte amenity=prison an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17062367 nicht.

Bitte entferne es dort wieder.

Danke und viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Shaun das Schaf (2023-02-26 18:58:56+00:00): Hi, da bisher keine Antwort kam, habe ich die Änderung wieder rückgängig gemacht.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
aTarom (2023-02-17 16:26:45+00:00): Hi, Dipak Nath, welcome,
something has gone wrong with this challenge at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32723896/history

"wiki data"="stadium"

can you check it please?
Cheers
kubahahaha (2023-03-29 00:28:52+00:00): W paczkomatach nie wpisuje się nazwy, tylko bardziej szczegółowe pola
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity=parcel%20locker?uselang=pl
Frans S (2023-02-20 14:09:22+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
your mappings are rather accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Tapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132684006
Frans S (2023-02-20 14:37:04+00:00): Hello again.  I noticed a serious offset of a number of buildings. According to the records, you used multiple imageries. 
Please be sure all mappings comply with the Maxar Imagery.
Best regards and keep mapping
ENGELBERT MODO (2023-02-21 02:44:30+00:00): Hi and thank you
MxxCon (2023-02-17 17:22:25+00:00): Hello.
When mapping features please pay attention not to glue features to each other unless they are actually connected. In this edit you glued dog park to the sidewalk..
Additionally, opening_hours tag has a pretty specific syntax. You can read more about it at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132684017
Crsi (2023-02-17 16:11:58+00:00): Hallo himbie,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich glaube du brauchst ein wenig Unterstützung beim Einfügen des Hochstandes und bei der Nutzung von OSM ;)

Ein Hochstand ist eine Amenity mit dem Wert 'hunting_stand'. Im Web-Editor kannst du dazu auf den Punkt klicken (feature type: 'Point', mit dem Tooltop "change feature type"). Es sollte eine Auswahl verschiedener Sachen wie Sitzbank, Müllereimer, Café, ..., kommen. In das Suchfeld darüber kannst du "hunting" schreiben und bekommst direkt den Vorschlag "hunting_stand". Diesen kannst du auswählen. Das reicht erst einmal, um diesen Punkt von Interesse (point of interest, POI) zu klassifizieren. Weitere Attribute (ist er abschließbar? ist er privat?) kann man anschließend optional hinzufügen.

Viele Grüße, Crsi
Roue-doudou (2023-02-23 15:57:01+00:00): Le traffic calming sur le node 244051635 ne semble pas faire de sens, il n'y en a pas a cet endroit, pouvez vous l'enlever ?
dadavidov (2023-02-23 16:36:22+00:00): Hello, je vais passer sur place pour aller voir car il me semble qu'il y en a un qui n'est pas signalé au sol ou panneau. Merci
Roue-doudou (2023-02-24 08:04:57+00:00): Je suis passé hier soir et il n'y a rien à ce niveau sur la place Jean Jaures, je l'enlève ;)
dadavidov (2023-02-24 15:34:41+00:00): Ah si, il y a bien plateau à cet endroit sur la place Jean jaurès (cf photo. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XsV8Aq3Z0uabOutY5VdEGcE4-BrdLzjO/view?usp=sharing). Mais oui, la pente est vraiment douce et je ne sais pas si ça "calme" bien les automobilistes :P
Roue-doudou (2023-02-24 15:47:39+00:00): Ok en effet, c'est vraiment très doux, je propose un speed table ? Je peux rajouter un traffic_calming=table sur les 2 way qui traversent les rails de tram ? peut être mieux qu'un tag ponctuel ?
Roue-doudou (2023-02-24 15:58:57+00:00): J'ai fait la modif, je te laisse me dire si ça te va ;)