piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CjMalone (2025-12-03 22:53:28+00:00): Rob has been significantly involved in the proposals for charging stations, working with operators and Open Data specs, I see no proposals for man_made=charging_station.
literan (2025-12-06 11:53:24+00:00): >I see no proposals for man_made=charging_station

yes, but: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like
marc__marc (2025-12-06 13:22:00+00:00): any tags you like is not an advise to create duplicate undocumented tags that have exactly the same meaning as an existing, frequently used and documented tag that has been approved (And thus review)  in a proposal.
Otherwise, we end up with lots of unusable data.
on our link, you 'll read "So you have followed good practice and searched the Wiki, map features, proposed features, rejected features, proposed relations and mailing lists' archives and still can't find a tag for what you'd like to map?"
If you that, you should think about using amenity=charging_station and/or man_made=charge_point
Regards,
Marc
literan (2025-12-08 19:28:53+00:00): > any tags you like is not an advise to create duplicate undocumented tags

This tag (man_made=charging_station) was created MUCH earlier than man_made=charge_point
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96064356

ok, maybe now it's good point to use man_made=charge_point tag here with access=no + bus=designated

But it's bad way to make mass edits like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162075945 without proper description, explanation and any tryings to discuss with local community
marc__marc (2025-12-08 23:29:09+00:00): The funny thing is that the original contributor had chosen a tag documented on objects other than those in this changeset before a participant in this thread made a mass edit to add a documented tag and then reverted it to say that remote editing should not be done.
I think it's time this problem was resolved.
If you think you need to discuss it with the local community to modify 50 objects, do so.
But in the meantime, in other parts of the world, via taginfo and iD, others are being affected by this problem here and adding incorrect values that then need to be reviewed.
literan (2025-02-03 20:17:49+00:00): вы никак не обосновали свои правки, поэтому откатываю до стабильной версии. Это тегирование обсуждалось в русскоязычном чате
user_22322865 (2025-02-03 20:45:10+00:00): `man_made=charging_station` is not a thing. Please use `man_made=charge_point` or `amenity=charging_station`.
dikkeknodel (2025-05-28 14:55:27+00:00): Hoi Jaap,
Je hebt hier relatie 18644811 geintroduceerd met een type=boundary  tag. Ik begrijp niet wat die boundary hier zou betekenen. Zou je dat willen uitleggen?
Groetjes,
Raymond
dikkeknodel (2025-09-12 19:25:39+00:00): Hoi Jaap,
zou je mijn vraag kunnen beantwoorden?
ivanbranco (2025-02-13 19:57:00+00:00): Hi yves klein,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356362148/history

just a reminder that wikimedia_commons=* is to be used for pictures depicting the specific object, in this case this specific tree row. This is not the case since we are in Germany and the picture has been shot in Russia.

thanks and good mapping
yves klein (2025-02-15 10:54:35+00:00): Hi ivanbranco, many thanks for your hint. It supports my intention to take particular pictures and load them up. Unfortunately, I have to wait till June. Regards, Yves
RedGreenBlue09 (2025-02-03 12:38:12+00:00): Nhánh này không nằm trong thiết kế của nút giao vì đã có nhánh https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1162524225
Trần Tất Sung (2025-02-05 05:57:38+00:00): Cảm ơn bạn đã giúp đỡ về nhánh nút giao này!
Leo Slager (2025-02-03 10:31:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-02-03 14:18:54+00:00): Feedback..
Dag Rowan..Alle begin is moeilijk. 
De gebroken polygoon heb ik hersteld.
De duiker heb ik weer ingekort.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162076658

Bebouwing uitgelijnd
MVG
eggie
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-02-04 17:54:47+00:00): Moin HeiKue,
welche Daten stammen von Wikipedia, Wikidata und Wikimedia? Bzw. welche Fotos hast Du auf Wikimedia Commons als Quelle verwendet?
Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
HeiKue (2025-02-04 19:45:53+00:00): Hallo Roger,
fragst Du allgemein, nach einem bestimmten Denkmal oder aus einem bestimmten Grund?
Die 4 Denkmäler besitzen ja wikdata- und wikimedia_commons-Tags, um damit zur Quelle zu gelangen.
Die 2 Stelen am Brückkanal habe ich nur etwas geschoben.
Grüße
Heiko
kmpoppe (2025-02-04 20:04:23+00:00): Hallo Heiko,

du hast in die Quellen des Changesets (u.a.) "Wikipedia" geschrieben. Das könnte man so deuten (und deswegen fragt Roger Wilco), dass du Informationen aus Wikipedia noch OpenStreetMap kopiert hast. Das wäre ein Lizenzproblem. Falls du "nur" den Denkmälern ihre wikidata/Wikipedia Tags zugewiesen hast ist das OK, ist aber eigentlich NICHT als Changesets Quelle anzugeben, das wäre dann im Kommentar besser aufgehoben.

K
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-02-04 20:05:43+00:00): Du hast die als Quellen angegeben. Leider sind wikidata und wikipedia keine zulässigen Quellen für OSM. Reines Verlinken ist natürlich OK, aber dann ist es auch keine Quelle. Also die Daten, die von dort übernommen wurden, müssten leider wieder gelöscht werden.

Bei wikimedia käme es auf die Lizenz der verwendeten Bilder drauf an.
HeiKue (2025-02-04 20:20:28+00:00): Ups, das war missverständlich.
Das mit dem Copyright weiß ich und habe natürlich nie Inhalte übernommen, sondern immer nur die wikidata/wikimedia_common/wikipedia-Tags dahin gesetzt.
Dann werde ich zukünftig nicht mehr als Quelle angeben, um Missverständnisse zu vermeiden.
Aber, wo wir gerade beim Thema sind, wie verhält es sich mit inscription?
Ist es OK, wenn ich die aus wikimedia_common-Bildern abschreibe?
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-02-04 20:25:44+00:00): Ich kann es Dir nicht genau sagen. Ich mache es nur bei Bildern, die eine CC0 Lizenz haben oder sonstwie gemeinfrei sind.

Bei OSM wollen wir ja auch auf Nummer sicher gehen. Nicht dass uns sowas mal auf die Füße fällt.
cehwitham (2025-11-04 23:34:36+00:00): This farmland overlaps a lot of other areas of farmland that are drawn at a more detailed level. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1330120028
It also crosses areas that are not farmland. I would suggest this way needs refining or removing.
Zadrotik (2025-02-03 09:46:20+00:00): Редактирование дорог, редактирование речки, добавлении информации из википедии*
Nakaner-repair (2025-08-12 15:43:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 170348716 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Rostas Krisztian: low-quality edits by MAPS.ME, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/134066
empty_child (2025-02-03 13:17:50+00:00): Hello
Please, don't use Bing photos (they're outdated and have a big shift in the region) and don't rename streets if they're compliant with community rules
dev_mapper (2025-02-04 10:54:45+00:00): Hello 
Ok, I understood about house placement shift. But what's wrong with renaming the road? This is how this road is called around here. What are the community rules on this?
empty_child (2025-02-04 14:21:43+00:00): TL;DR: If the transliteration from Georgian doesn't sound similar to the name in the target language, retain the transliteration. For instance, use "Ialbuzi Street/улица Иалбузи" instead of "Elbrus Street/улица Эльбруса".

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Georgia_Abkhazia_South-Ossetia#Street_Naming_Rule_for_Different_Languages
empty_child (2025-02-04 14:22:41+00:00): Also, Zugdidi already was synced with NAPR Address Plan
JeroenHoek (2025-02-03 14:58:18+00:00): Welk verkeersbord hangt daar dat het een fietspad maakt? Vergeet je mofa en moped niet te taggen indien van toepassing?
ivanbranco (2025-02-23 19:12:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162865353
gendy54 (2025-08-08 21:32:21+00:00): Bonjour,

Ce que vous avez rajouté ne sert à rien et fait même doublon car l'adresse était déjà rajoutée. Le nom de commune et code postal est inutile car déjà compris dans la position de l'adresse ainsi que lat et lon.
Frans S (2025-02-21 14:09:12+00:00): Helllo . Thanks for mapping.
You mapped a track which already exists.
Didn't you noticed that ?
You added a straight line despite the track is not that straight. Follow the trace when you map roads please.
Best regards
Leo Slager (2025-02-03 10:34:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
mavl (2025-02-05 14:02:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162167075 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: wrong values for name:en - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161608012].
ChrissW-R1 (2025-02-03 21:57:59+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/4613047
mavl (2025-02-05 14:02:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162167075 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: wrong values for name:en - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161608012].
eggie (2025-02-11 11:31:01+00:00): Dag Robert,

Svp op de bestaande adresnodes bijtaggen.
Aangepast.
MVG
eggie
Monchinho (2025-02-03 10:31:29+00:00): Hola.

Por favor, revise las notas. En las etiquetas aparece el nombre oficial como official_name (O Fonxérez) y el nombre real (O Fonxerce), ya aprobado para próxima oficialización. Ruego dejarlo como estaba. Saludos.
Frans S (2025-02-03 11:10:43+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. However, I quess you did not follow the instructions ! Map from the Esri imagery after aligning the offset !
This (and other ) task has been invalidated and need more mapping 
Best regards and keep mapping
NoKnow (2025-02-03 13:20:06+00:00): that is not what the instructions say, I go by the instructions. it says to use bing and optionaly to use esri. it does not state esri has to be used in the instructions. it says to use bing imagery, and IF esri is used to allign it with bing, twice is stated to use bing imagery, not only for allignment but imagery. and that esri optionaly may be used. you now require esri while that is not instructed and invalidate the work. wasting time. mappers look at the instructions. if validators make comments that are different from the instructions then either the instructions are wrong or the validator. so either of those need to be fixed so we don't waste work.
NoKnow (2025-02-03 13:27:41+00:00): if the completion tab and comments tab give contradictory instructions compare to the instructions tab, that is incorrect and the instructions tab text should be changed. otherwise we're wasting people's time
NoKnow (2025-02-03 13:31:09+00:00): i've had it happen several times before that this validator has invalidated based on requirements that are either not in the instructions or only stated as optional. please take more care in writing the instructions or validating, whichever is at play here.
NoKnow (2025-02-03 13:36:03+00:00): only this validator i've had this problem with. I apreciate the time put in as a volunteer. but don't keep sending me messages about things that are not instructed, or changes that are not made by me at all that are incorrect. this keeps happening. just to inform you. much apreciated.
Frans S (2025-02-03 17:23:34+00:00): Hello.

I'm afraid I didn't express myself well with my comment.


Here's what I meant.

The existing imagery ( Bing) is old (Vintage:Dec 31, 2009 - Sep 7, 2016)

Esri World Imagery

Zoom:17

Vintage:Jun 22, 2023

 Since the Bing Imagery was taken, many more buildings are built and visible on the ESRI imagery.

The intention is that the mapping be done on the Bing Imagery .

This may involve first matching the already existing mappings with the footprints on Bing Imagery. Correct the offset as needed by shifting all mappings to match.


Because Bing is quite old, the new buildings visible on the ESRI imagery must also be mapped and in such a way that ESRI's offset is corrected so that they both match.


I agree with you that it is not explicitly stated in the instructions that the objects visible on the ESRI imagery should also be mapped. For me it is obvious.
I will ask the PM to adjust the instructions  and mention this.

Kind regards.
Frans S (2025-02-03 11:14:35+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
 lease take into consideration that ESRI Imagery (much more recent) shows buildings which are not visible on the Bing Imagery. So the aim is to map from Esri imagery (after aligning the imagery to Bing) So, many buildings still need to be mapped. 
 Best regards and keep mapping and adjusting.
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-03 12:20:36+00:00): Just a test?
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
NeisBot (2025-02-08 08:06:08+00:00): Hi ywanght, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 36 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-10 06:11:00+00:00): Thanks for your private message.

#HappyMapping
mweper (2025-02-03 12:34:53+00:00): Hello. The barrier tag has been added for the node, within a section of the street. 
Please correct it. Regards.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 03:11:00+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165094347
Monchinho (2025-02-03 11:25:08+00:00): ¿Por qué borras la información de notas donde se explica el topónimo correcto y se adjunta name y official_name?
literan (2025-02-03 14:04:49+00:00): здесь тоже - зачем удалили мультиполигон вырубки? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11165107/history
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:37:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
Frans S (2025-02-11 15:36:50+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
You mapped 2 plots of bare land for buildings.
Check if there is a shadow which proofs that an object is above ground level and thus a building.
Best regards
NeisBot (2025-02-08 08:06:08+00:00): Hi czubi, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 34 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
czubi (2025-02-08 08:41:26+00:00): Hausnummer (HN) mit Straßennamen ergänzt ;-)
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-08 08:43:59+00:00): 👍
goodidea (2025-03-05 20:23:27+00:00): Da ist noch disused:shop=yes bei Moccali Bäckerei. Ich schreib's nur, weil das anscheinend öfters mal passiert. Grüße!
nw520 (2025-03-05 20:41:50+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, goodidea. Absichtlich ist das nicht, aber in der Tat verpeile ich manchmal (oder auch öfter) disused:* zu löschen. Ich versuche mal besser darauf zu achten… oder mir eine Validator-Regel anzulegen. Beste Grüße
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:39:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:38:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:39:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:37:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:39:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:38:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:38:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:39:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:39:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:39:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:37:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:39:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:37:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:39:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:38:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:37:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:37:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:39:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:38:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:37:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:38:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:39:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:37:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:37:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:39:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:39:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:39:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:39:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:37:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:39:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:38:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 10:38:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162239696 where the changeset comment is: revert un-documented and buggy fuel station import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17202
ChrissW-R1 (2025-02-03 22:00:22+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/4613050