piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
willkmis (2024-07-01 15:19:43+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! Please note that highway=trunk is defined in California, as in most of the US, as a key long distance connection, not by the presence of an interchange. This definition is documented in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/California/2022_Highway_Classification_Guidelines. Therefore, I don't think this short stretch of Olympic warrants a classification change.

Also, it looks like you've dragged the sidewalk near La Cienega/Obama so that it crosses the road. Please take care when modifying ways so that they all align with each other.

Thanks!
Will
willkmis (2024-07-10 06:06:09+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153768682
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-01 14:17:40+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153414862
silversurfer83 (2024-07-01 18:42:27+00:00): Warum entfernst du denn die Informationen zur Oberfläche?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153414939
lu456 (2024-07-01 19:06:54+00:00): Habe die Angaben den wahren Gegebenheiten angepasst und entsprechend geändert bzw wenn diese indifferent sind komplett entfernt. Die Wege sind nicht homogen aus einem Material. Viele Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153414939
silversurfer83 (2024-07-04 00:26:48+00:00): Ok. Danke für die Info.

Wir können die Wege auch an passender Stelle einfach auftrennen und für jeden Abschnitt passende Eigenschaften vergeben.

Woher kommt denn jetzt das flächendeckende "access=private"? Wenn das alles "normale" Waldwege sind, sollte das bitte entsprechend angepasst werden (sowas wie "motor_vehicle=forestry" zB)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153414939
willkmis (2024-07-01 15:13:14+00:00): Hi, why did you delete this neighborhood? It certainly exists in real life and is called this by residents.
willkmis (2024-07-10 05:57:47+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153768500
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-02 18:18:00+00:00): Hi oliverjeremy, welcome to OSM.

I think your map edits should be reviewed. In particular the use of the name tag.

Thanks.
ericvb (2025-12-01 09:31:29+00:00): entrances should be parts of the building outline. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance
bxl-forever (2025-12-01 12:19:09+00:00): Very true, indeed.  But what is the purpose of flagging my changeset as erroneous?  What mistake are you reporting here specifically?
streckenkundler (2024-07-01 20:03:50+00:00): Bitte, Bitte, Bitte splittet keine Kreisverkehre wegen Busrouten! Das ist technisch nicht notwendig! Wenn Auswerte-Tools mt geschlossenen Kreisverkehren nicht klar kommen, müssen die Tools angepasst, nicht die Daten an die Tools!

Ein Splillten der  Kreisverkehre ist ausschließlich nur notwendig, wenn sich innerhalb des Kreisverkehres die Anzahl der Fahrspuren ändert.

Es ist nicht das erste mal, daß ich deswegen diesen (und andere) Kreisverkehre anfasse...

Danke,

Entschuldigung, aber ich habe das revertet.

streckenkundler
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-01 14:45:24+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/153415362
AlkalIn (2024-07-02 13:31:25+00:00): Dear Engelbert,
It seems the relation 11024850 has been broken after your edits.
See history here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11024850/history
Please can you have a look?
Best,
Alkalin
ENGELBERT MODO (2024-07-02 15:03:50+00:00): Thanks alkalin I have already ajust this changeset pls can you check
AlkalIn (2024-07-03 16:42:13+00:00): Thank you Engelbert for your prompt reply. Yes you fixed it. It seems that forest multipolygons around Yaounde have recently been broken repeatidly by different people. And I can't keep up fixing them. Please don't hesitate to help fixing these whenever you encounter one.
ENGELBERT MODO (2024-07-03 16:54:34+00:00): Hi aoky no problem actual we are  working to update all the dataabse on Cameroon and we have new mappers  who have been trained and who haven't yet fully taken on the job, so that justifies these small errors a little.
AlkalIn (2024-07-03 22:31:29+00:00): Hi, ok, that's great news new people are trained to build the map. Its important to explain them well how relations works since many people have work hard to get the map of Cameroon so detailed. There seems to be a miss-conception about residential area as you can see in this relation:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10976082/history
This is mostly forest with some farmlands and not a large residential area like a city. There are several large other patchs like this that have been erroneously classified as residential in the Center region. Please can you check this as well.
ENGELBERT MODO (2024-07-04 09:50:53+00:00): Okay no problem also it is possible to give me tools that  will help me to find rapidly al  relation with erros?
AlkalIn (2024-07-04 12:52:49+00:00): You can use OSM inspector and fix all the issues that are displayed in it:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi

For instance a forest polygon east of Eseka is currently broken and OSM inspector indicates that there is an element of that multipolygon that is wrongly classified as outer. See here:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=10.57602&lat=3.45910&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.70&overlays=ring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags

A simpler way is just to look at the map and find all empty area. In Cameroon the entire country has been tagged so if you see a white patch it means a new error has been introduced recently.
AlkalIn (2024-07-04 12:54:50+00:00): There is another broken relation here that needs inspection for instance:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153415236#map=13/4.1340/11.6917
AlkalIn (2024-07-04 12:58:19+00:00): And two others here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153415236#map=11/5.0236/12.2539
I found them by looking at white area on the map. Of course this is not very efficient because it can takes several days before the changes are included on the map at that scale.
AlkalIn (2024-07-04 13:03:48+00:00): And here is a misclassified residential area (should be a forest):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153415236#map=14/3.9739/12.0084

You can find those by just looking for large gray patchs on the map. I see a few others.
ENGELBERT MODO (2024-07-05 07:33:01+00:00): Hi okay I have already a good  understanding 
 I see that you have fixed many problem
silversurfer83 (2024-07-01 18:47:28+00:00): Moin Jörg

deine Änderungen werden besser :)

Was mir fehlt: Ein schönerer Kommentar entsprechend:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

und eine Quellenangabe. Warst du hier in Korbach oder woher weißt du, das hier der Stellplatz sein soll?

Adressen kommen in der von dir gewählten Form übringens nur an Gebäude bzw. Grundstücke und POIs wie Geschäfte oder so.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153416300
marczoutendijk (2024-12-04 11:35:35+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1298127364
bridge=beton is not a recognized value for bridge. 
What did you want to tag?

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Michel Voss (2024-12-19 22:35:28+00:00): beton=concrete in French, France is the land where it was invented😉.
marczoutendijk (2024-12-20 07:54:53+00:00): But then surface=concrete is a much better tag in that situation.

Wiki:
"The value of the key is used to indicate the type of the bridge. See the detail of the known types below. "

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge

Marc.
ToniE (2024-07-01 15:48:33+00:00): Servus,

der Parkplatz ist doch nur von Montag bis Freitag 'privat', so steht's auf dem Schild.

Das hatte ich mit access:conditional=private @ Mo-Fr bereits korrekt gemapped.

Ein generelles access=private ist falsch.

Gruß
Toni
KaminKamel (2024-07-01 16:20:13+00:00): Hi,

sorry, mir war in StreetComplete nicht ersichtlich dass es schon gemapped ist, und erst recht nicht dass es schon besser gemapped ist als ich es dann getan habe.
Bin noch neu.
Ich probiere die Änderung rückgängig zu machen.
Viele grüße
ToniE (2024-07-01 16:34:57+00:00): Danke, und: "ah, ja streetcomplete".

Hätte ich access=yes zusätzlich gemapped, hätte SC nicht gefragt.
Werde in Zukunft dran denken.

Gruß
Toni
Rom1 (2024-07-01 18:55:01+00:00): Bonjour, vous êtes gênée par le rendu d'objets que vous ne souhaiteriez pas voir apparaître. Sauf qu'à preuve du contraire, ils ont été identifiés au départ par quelqu'un connaissant les locaux. Pour les toilettes, j'ai retiré l'attribut amenity=toilets comme expliqué à https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity=toilets#Toilettes_au_sein_d'un_lieu_tiers De fait ils ne seront plus visibles sur le rendu. Ce dernier n'est pas une raison pour modifier les données à sa convenance. Merci d'y veiller.
VirginieVB (2024-07-02 08:08:45+00:00): Bonjour, je connais également les locaux, y travaillant depuis 20 ans. Les toilettes ne sont pas publics effectivement. Merci d'avoir modifié le rendu, cela laisse apparaître le nom de l'établissement, c'est le principal
Paraguas (2024-07-02 16:33:03+00:00): Vielen Dank für deine zeitnahe Reaktion :)
Leo Slager (2024-07-02 10:47:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
emersonveenstra (2024-07-02 11:01:54+00:00): Hi there,

You have lanes:backward and lanes:forward on a oneway street here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1298152116

Could you double check and fix that? Thanks!
silversurfer83 (2024-07-01 18:51:52+00:00): Danke :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153420047
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-07-03 09:09:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/980873312/history - coś nie tak tu poszło, zobacz też https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/5718

chyba coś nie tak z konfiguracją SCEE poszło
BCNorwich (2024-07-01 18:49:00+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

OSM is a live worldwide database from which thousands of maps are compiled. OSM welcomes anyone to add ground truth verifiable data. Thus personal notes are not allowed and are regarded as fiction. So I've reverted your changes.

I hope you understand the concern. Regards Bernard.
NieWnen (2024-07-02 18:49:22+00:00): Nie rozumiem do końca opisu, ale taka zmiana nie jest poprawna.

Linie drogi nie powinny się nakładać.

Masz może jakieś zdjęcie, bo na ortofotomapie tego nie widać?
5m4u9 (2024-07-01 19:31:54+00:00): Hola, gracias por añadir la tienda al mapa.

Tengo una duda, colocas la página web de SuperCampesino, esta tienda forma parte de esta cadena de tiendas?

Añadí la moneda BOB (bolivianos) y una pequeña descripción de la tienda...
PedroMTG13 (2024-07-01 17:25:06+00:00): Olá,
As relações que editastes ficaram com membros até campanhã, por favor elimina também essas...
54LD5JB3JX (2024-07-10 19:42:09+00:00): I am the GIS Coordinator for the City of Norton. There is a newly adopted road named Progress Way NE.  The aerial photo is outdated.  Also there is a two story Earthlink call center at this location.
eteb3 (2024-08-01 08:37:29+00:00): Hi ianemitchell42, thanks for your edit. 

Could I trouble you with some further questions?

1. Would I be right to infer a typo in the name of the farm? The building is marked "Gwerbybustach Farm" (with a B), but address given as "Gwernybustach, Forest Coal Pit" (with an N). This building here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/998038829

2. There's a sign by a drive heading up to that building, indicating "Fforest Farmhouse". (Heading up the valley, the drivev is just before one with the vinyl banner signing Like Work But Different). Would I be right that the building currently named as the Gwe.. Farm is strictly Fforest Farmhouse? 

3. If so, would I be right to infer that the whole of the campus is Gwe.. Farm, so we can add an area (like the one whose name you removed, showing light orange on the default view). I imagine something along these lines here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tBKUoCV81B7-QCcajpdvhDCEu9b2Ru35/view?usp=share_link

Finally, do you know the name of the farm that was erroneously tagged as Gwerbybustach Farm before your edit?

Many thanks for your help - I'm not local (but visit the area regularly), and local knowledge is the best thing for an accurate map!
Ianemitchell42 (2024-08-01 10:18:02+00:00): All good questions.
The original name of the farm is Gwernybustach. Or Gwern y Bustach.
We have a holiday let, which we decided to call Fforest Farmhouse, as it’s easier to say. For English speakers. The business at the North End is based in another building called Ty Gallu. 
But the whole thing is probably still Gwernybustach, as it says on the OS map.
Too much information?
Ianemitchell42 (2024-08-01 10:19:18+00:00): Also, the orange shaded bit is some outbuildings of the Dower House farm, nothing to do with us.
Ianemitchell42 (2024-08-01 10:20:53+00:00): ..and do pop in if you’re passing.
eteb3 (2024-08-01 12:37:08+00:00): Can't have too much info...

The caches might update slowly, but should now look like this: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1L5PAuf7HsyYqUC2_WIAjlxT6W0O7FTmH/view?usp=share_link

Any other refinements, feel free to say (or edit direct, obviously).

And thanks for kind offer!
hatul (2024-07-04 08:11:51+00:00): שלום יצחק.
אני מעריך מאוד את התרומות שלך למפה.
בבקשה לא לסמן שלטים לא קיימים. הם לא מיועדים להסברים על השביל.
אנחנו ממפים את מה שיש בשטח והמטייל יצטרך להסתדר ולמצוא את השביל בעצמו.
תודה
Yitzchak M (2024-07-04 10:25:35+00:00): היי עמיעד.
גם אני מאד מעריך את התרומות שלך אבל השיטה הזאת של "המטייל יצטרך להסתדר ולמצוא את השביל בעצמו", נקודה, לפי דעתי זו שיטה נורא במיוחד אם מדברים על שביל מוסתר!
hatul (2024-07-04 10:34:34+00:00): מצטער. אבל מפה מציגה מה שיש, לא מה שאין.
אפשר לדרג את הנראות של השביל עם trail_visibility.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility
Yitzchak M (2024-07-04 10:49:52+00:00): ומה זה ייתן למשתמש רגיל? יש אפליקציה שמתייחס לדירוג הזה? שנינו ידעים שלא. זה חסרון ענק, אבל מה לעשות? הטוב גובר על הרע.
hatul (2024-07-04 10:57:05+00:00): אנחנו לא מוסיפים מידע בשביל אפליקציה מסוימת. המידע שם ומי שרוצה יכול לבחור איך להציג אותו.
להוסיף מידע לא תקני רק כדי שיראה למשתמש באפליקציה מסוימת זו טעות.
Mb_651 (2024-07-01 17:05:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2914928
Mb_651 (2024-07-01 17:05:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2914929
Allison P (2024-07-01 18:36:23+00:00): Don't do this! This is tagging for the renderer and not allowed on OSM.
flohoff (2024-07-02 09:59:15+00:00): Moin,
so als hint - Guck nochmal nach maxspeed:type - Das ist universeller als das zone:maxspeed.

Es gibt auch noch source:maxspeed was "quasi" identisch zu maxspeed:type ist - das ist so eine Deutsche eigenheit.

StreetComplete mapped auch maxspeed:type in den challenges.

(Alles jetzt aus dem Kopf - müsste ich jetzt auch alles nochmal nachlesen)

Flo
silversurfer83 (2024-07-01 18:55:13+00:00): Hi :)

Gute Arbeit.

Ein Tip: Für MTB-Trails ist es einfacher wenn du "access=no" setzt und dann "bicycle=designated". Dann muss nicht jedes Verkehrsmittel einzeln ausgeschlossen werden ;)

Gute Fahrt
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153422017
Frich (2024-07-02 14:20:23+00:00): Danke, merke ich mir fürs nächste Mal!
Udarian (2024-07-02 05:55:08+00:00): next time can you leave a change set comment describing what you did, something like "updated multi-storey at Jungle Island" would have worked well enough for this commit; for more information see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments .
archie (2024-07-01 17:51:29+00:00): Hej, bra att du ritar in byggnader m m här!
Det du ritat in är dock inte rätt placerat, dvs objekten har en imagery offset. Du måste justera din bildbakgrund så att den ligger rätt. Satellitbilder har inte i sig rätt läge - speciellt inte Bing. Därför måste du justera denna offset. Hur du gör framgår här: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_aerial_imagery

En annan sak. Var vänlig koppla inte ihop vägar (highway) med landuse. 
Tack!
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-11 02:44:10+00:00): Reverted by DWG for mass deletions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153805473
Kri_ttt (2024-07-01 18:20:08+00:00): พระราชกิจจาฯ อ้างอิงแนวเขตเพิ่มเติม :
https://dl.parliament.go.th/bitstream/handle/20.500.13072/265105/SOP-DIP_P_1067683_0001.pdf?sequence=1

https://download.asa.or.th/03media/04law/cba/bb/bb49.pdf
Nithinat S (2024-07-07 04:07:59+00:00): สวัสดีครับ
ผมคิดว่าแผนที่ในราชกิจจาอาจจะไม่ใช่ source ที่ถูกต้องที่สุดนะครับ (ในกรณีนี้และอีกหลายกรณี) ในกรณีของแนวเขตระหว่าง่ กทม. กับ อบต. พันท้ายนรสิงห์ กับระหว่าง กทม. กับ อบต. บ้านคลองสวน หลักเขต กทม. ที่ปักอยู่ในพื้นที่จริงน่าจะถูกต้องกว่านะครับ ซึ่งสามารถ double check ได้จากการระบุที่อยู่ของสถานที่ในจุดต่าง ๆ (เช่น โรงเรียนสารสาสน์วิเทศศึกษา ที่ชัดเจนว่าอยู่ในเขตจังหวัดสมุทรปราการ) โครงการทำถนนของแต่ละ อปท. ตลอดจนเขตการปกครองที่ระบุไว้ในโฉนดที่ดินที่เช็กได้จากเว็บกรมที่ดินด้วยครับ
NeisBot (2024-07-01 18:18:25+00:00): Hi Illiuha, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/way/1298170688
https://osm.org/way/1298170687

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
Nzau (2024-09-03 17:48:26+00:00): Bonjour ludo,

Le chemin en herbe a t-il bien été transformé en voie verte goudronnée ici ? La vue aérienne (qui date un peu) ne révèle pas ces changements.

Et je me permets de changer le highway en 'path' puisqu'il s'agit de la bonne pratique pour cartographier les voies vertes.

Bonne contribution,
Enzo.
ludo7620 (2024-09-03 18:13:11+00:00): Bonjour,

Oui c'est ça, c'est maintenant une voie verte goudronné. Merci pour le changement, j'ai encore beaucoup à apprendre 😁

Bonne soirée.
Ludo
Nzau (2024-09-04 06:52:59+00:00): Merci pour ton retour si rapide !
N'hésite pas à poser des questions sur le forum si besoin https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/

Mais ta contribution était déjà très bonne ^^

 Bonne journée,
Enzo
Tomas Straupis (2024-07-08 05:59:00+00:00): Construction ways are already real ways, so if you decide to change proposed to construction, you should also fix all routing with other existing ways. Now you've added tons of topology errors.
Jay May (2024-07-08 06:24:05+00:00): Hmmm ... which ones do you have in mind?
Tomas Straupis (2024-07-08 07:28:38+00:00): All of them. There was a good reason why people with GIS skills did not change these from proposed. Now this region gives ~50 topology errors alone.
jtracey (2024-07-02 20:01:17+00:00): You can't use the region's data, they haven't provided a waiver and their license hasn't been approved. Can you list what in particular was sourced from that? Otherwise we'll have to revert the whole changeset.
wordbird (2024-07-02 20:07:40+00:00): Sorry about that. I had used their GIS map to determine which sections of the multiuse pathway should be labeled the "Walter Bean Grand River Trail".

Perhaps there are other approved local sources I can use instead? City or Kitchener or Waterloo
jtracey (2024-07-02 22:29:05+00:00): No worries, I think what's considered the Walter Bean trail is common enough local knowledge that it's not worth reverting.

Unfortunately, each city, the region, and the Grand River Conservation Authority all used their own independently modified version of the OGL (as in, it's not even just that they all decided to use one modified version of the actual OGL, they didn't even make the same changes to it). The changes are small enough that I suspect each license would be fine, but as a non-lawyer, I can't really judge, and the LWG doesn't want to go through each municipality in Canada that decided their lawyers in particular need to make some edits. I (and at least one other local) have tried reaching out to them multiple times over many years, and as recently as two weeks ago, but have never gotten an answer from any of them.
jtracey (2024-07-03 01:17:58+00:00): Well that's a coincidence, the City of Kitchener actually finally got back to me, and state their license is compatible.
wordbird (2024-07-03 14:29:10+00:00): Thank you for the information, that's very helpful!
josmougn (2024-08-29 23:23:32+00:00): salut,
un petit test : tu es averti de ce commentaire à ton groupe de modifs ?
José
ISTC_GIS (2024-07-01 19:40:36+00:00): Unless you have the correct way to add blue to this field, this should not be a green football field per Boise State University policy.
iandees (2024-07-01 20:12:58+00:00): What you're describing is known as "Tagging for the Renderer" (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer).

OpenStreetMap would rather have correct data in its database than a single correct rendering of the map data. In this specific case, this object is a sports pitch for American football. It is not a water reservoir. Yes, the default map style on osm.org renders pitches with a green color, but if color is important to you, then the correct thing to do is to set up your own rendering pipeline and render the field using the desired color.
Глеб (2024-10-01 22:23:29+00:00): согласно правилам ОСМ такие объекты не могут так называться
CasGroenigen (2024-08-09 13:22:48+00:00): Hi TehSmithster,

In your recent changes you have removed quite a lot of tracks from which a great chunck is still visible on Satellite imagery and have recently still been in use. 

Could you explain why you have removed all these tracks? because I don't think they should've all been removed. 

Here you can see your changes in this changeset overlaid with a satellite view: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153424877 A lot of the tracks are still visible here.

Would you agree with me reverting your changes? 
I and some others would be willing to go over the tracks to correct some that might need to be re-aligned or removed anyways.

Kind Regards,
CasGroenigen
TehSmithster (2024-08-09 15:41:21+00:00): Good morning,

Those tracks are not roads, and are not intended to be used by vehicles.  They are what we call "turn roads" and they paths between fields.  People getting directed on these tracks with navigation apps that use OSM data have wrecked and gotten their vehicles stuck as they are nothing but dirt or grass.

They only looked used because tractors use them during growing season.

Thanks!
TehSmithster
CasGroenigen (2024-08-12 07:48:06+00:00): Good morning,

Thanks for your response, these turn roads/land access roads for farmers to access land are correct to be mapped as highway=track according to the osm wiki. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack

If there is an issue of vehicles getting stuck on the tracks due to faulty routing, it is probably a good practice to add access=private tags to the tracks that are on private property. Or a combination of surface=unpaved/surface=dirt and smoothness=very_bad that could be taken into account by the routing software.

Regards,
CasGroenigen
CasGroenigen (2024-08-20 11:56:01+00:00): I would be willing to help with tagging them as private and/or tagging that the smoothness is very bad if we revert.