piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tumtrahS (2023-10-09 09:18:47+00:00): Hallo Joachim, Danke für die Belehrung (das ist positiv gemeint). Da ich mich noch nie mit Rettungspunkten beschäftigt habe, bin ich hier offensichtlich nicht richtig vorgegangen. Ich habe trotzdem noch 2 Nachfragen. Du hast jetzt wieder einen Zustand aktiviert, der offensichtlich falsch ist. Mein Änderung war offensichtlich richtig. 1. gibt es Quellen, die meine Version stützen und 2. passt die Nummer in das System, das hier offensichtlich verwendet wird. 
2. Als Naturwissenschaftler tue ich mich mit der juristischen Logik schwer. Auf https://kwf2020.kwf-online.de/rettungspunkte/ steht: "Als Anbieter von IT-Lösungen
Die Daten stehen für eine Anwendung und Weiterverarbeitung in Projekten und Dienstleistungen zentral zur Verfügung. Die Rettungspunktbezeichnungen und Lageorte der Rettungspunkte dürfen jedoch nicht verändert werden." Das würde für mich ausreichen, die Nummer dieses Rettungspunktes von dieser Seite zu übernehmen. Egal, welche Lizenz dahinter steht. Die Verweise auf die entsprechenden Forumsbeiträge sind nicht sonderlich hilfreich für diesen Fall.
Viele Grüße
Hartmut
trailschneck (2024-11-24 11:55:52+00:00): Das verstehe ich auch nicht. Den Text auf der KWF-Website habe ich auch gelesen. Das bedeutet für mich das ich durchaus Rettungspunkte an den in der GPX-Datei vermerkten Koordinaten eintragen und die alten Rettungspunkte entfernen kann. Ich habe diese mir diese Woche die Arbeit gemacht und bin einige Notes auf der Rückfahrt von Trier abgefahren. Da war nicht an einer Stelle irgendein Rettungspunktschild . Und bei den Rettungspunkten im Wald wird das nicht viel anders aussehen. Und dann zieht man sich an einer Aussage hoch das vielleicht 1% der Rettungspunkte nicht stimmen könnten, lässt aber seit über 8 Jahren lauter nicht mehr vorhandene Rettungspunkte in der Karte stehen. Sorry, aber die Logik verstehe ich nicht.
Frans S (2023-10-08 10:18:30+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142240562
silversurfer83 (2023-10-07 11:55:43+00:00): Moin Geilo,

das neue Becken östlich vom Hangar hab ich erstmal wieder entfernt genau wie das indische Restaurant der Marke Mömax...

Diese Datenbank wird täglich von millionen Menschen genutzt und ist kein Spielplatz. Bitte unterlasse solche schlechten Scherze hier.

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142240661
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-08 06:45:56+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15144
ZLima12 (2025-11-03 08:17:04+00:00): Hi,

It appears that you have created no U-turn restrictions in places where you simply think that people should not be performing U-turns. This isn't what turn restrictions are supposed to be used for; you should generally only add no U-turn restrictions if there is a no U-turn sign. The same goes for other types of restrictions, but no U-turn restrictions in particular are commonly misused like this.
ID10T_Chris (2025-11-03 16:37:55+00:00): Understood. I'll pay more attention to this for future changes.
ZLima12 (2025-11-03 19:13:13+00:00): No worries, thanks for understanding. There are occasional times where it is deemed more okay to add a restriction even when there isn't a sign. For example, if traffic is given a slip road to use, some would add a restriction saying that traffic can't use the main intersection. This is still somewhat controversial though.

Basically, if you would be in fear of getting pulled over by the police for performing the maneuver, you could consider adding a turn restriction. In these cases though, you were adding no U-turn restrictions at most road junctions, where you probably could make a U-turn without incident.

In any case, you should add the tag implicit=yes to the relation if there isn't a sign saying that you can't do the action.
Frans S (2023-10-08 10:17:50+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142240860
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-12-02 20:00:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144702556 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: fake data without any reliable source
map per (2023-10-06 20:11:44+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
DreamDreamer (2023-12-11 22:41:59+00:00): Пивная кухя на месте, работает, видел на прошлой неделе. Откатите changeset.
Lejun (2023-10-07 07:06:15+00:00): Hi there, I canceled your changeset but thanks for your initiative.

The first, and smallest, issue is that the changeset contained modification ranging from Phoenix to Congo. It'd have been better to split it into two uploads.

The other issue is that you erroneously moved some nodes leading to bigger issues with the data. Please be more careful when editing in the future, and feel free to ping me if you need any help.
pitscheplatsch (2023-10-08 07:24:56+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142257053
Frans S (2023-10-08 10:17:05+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142241459
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 11:01:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143688019, 143688024, 143688006 where the changeset comment is: Entfernung von Edits eines selbst-gelöschten Users
eggie (2023-10-06 18:02:41+00:00): Dag Flame... Meestal zal het access=private zijn.
Formeel moet dat dan wel weer aangegeven zijn op 'blijkbare wijze.' 
art 461 wvs  en dat staat er meestal niet. 
Bovendien wil DHL ook z'n pakketjes kwijt.
Die highway=pedestrian hier van noord naar zuid heb ik net omgezet naar een highway=tracj  met access=pivate
Veel toegangswegen zijn geïmporteerd als pedestrian in 2007 (Donatie kaartenmaker AND)
Dat klopt natuurlijk niet.
Maar je mag gewoon de toegangswegen  en opritten in OSM zetten. 
Het is ook nuttig voor hulpdiensten die tegenwoordig ook op OSM rijden. 
Stukken erf laat ik dan achterwege. 
Hoe zo'n bezwaar en de volgende discussie een eigen leven gaat leiden kun je hier lezen.
Schrik niet...

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapper-beroept-zich-op-uitspraak-van-raad-van-state-gaat-dat-osm-aan/89112

en lees ook vooral aan het eind, want het is nu weer een actueel draadje.
gr eggie
eggie (2023-10-06 18:04:39+00:00): Wat richtlijnen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice
tenzul (2023-10-07 11:01:21+00:00): Hey wokue,

meinst du es würde mehr Sinn machen access=forestry zu motor_vehicle=forestry ändern, anstatt den Tag ganz zu löschen? Dann würden keine Informationen verloren gehen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142242351
Frans S (2023-10-08 10:16:19+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142242531
Xvtn (2023-12-14 15:38:57+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I went over your recent changes. Looks great overall, I did leave comments with tips on a couple of your other changesets.
moje_konto (2023-10-19 07:50:36+00:00): www.openstreetmap.org/way/1156185017
Budynek już jest w ewidencji i na fotomapie Esri - więc zwiększyłem dokładność jego obrysu, skoro budowa się zakończyła, to tak samo ustawiłem na budynku.

www.openstreetmap.org/way/1213664170
Tutaj dodałeś podjazd - więc trzeba też zwiększyć jego dokładność.

Teraz przecina się z budynkiem. Podjazdu nie ma jeszcze na fotomapie, więc daję znać, bo pewnie sprawdziłeś w terenie i porównując z aktualnym obrysem budynku lepiej go zaznaczysz.
moje_konto (2023-11-14 20:37:56+00:00): Nie wiem jak wygląda tutaj podjazd, przesunąłem by nie przecinał budynku.
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 11:01:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143688019, 143688024, 143688006 where the changeset comment is: Entfernung von Edits eines selbst-gelöschten Users
022 (2023-10-07 07:07:25+00:00): This is vandalism.
022 (2023-10-08 16:42:14+00:00): Hi, I noticed you made some suspicious looking edits and added some things that do not exist. I understand that maybe you are inexperienced but please do not add in tunnels and roads unless you confirm that they exist from the ground. Many aerial imagery might not be up to date and could contain incorrect information. Please also put more of a description so people know what you are doing. Thanks :)
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-06 18:40:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11244356888

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
map per (2023-10-06 20:13:52+00:00): Wegen review_reqested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
britischer_elch (2023-10-07 09:58:24+00:00): Vielen Dank fürs Reviewen! :-)
Soshal Distan Singh (2023-10-07 21:57:00+00:00): удаление личных отметок

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142285187
SekeRob (2023-10-08 13:15:31+00:00): Ciao,

Per il vostro piacere di lettura e per l'applicazione ai vostri change sets in futuri. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments

Nessun commento è inutile.

Grazie
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 11:01:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143688019, 143688024, 143688006 where the changeset comment is: Entfernung von Edits eines selbst-gelöschten Users
Gustrac (2023-10-06 19:11:56+00:00): Buena Informacion
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 10:59:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143687914, 143687898, 143687891, 143687921 where the changeset comment is: Entfernung von Edits eines selbst-gelöschten Users
eggie (2023-10-07 12:19:46+00:00): Hoi, Mark
De relaties zijn nog intact op de 
' constructions'
Nog maar even zo laten totdat het allemaal iets duidelijke wordt.
Maar als je weet hoe dat met knooppunt 11 zit en hoe de routes dan nu lopen dan kan het wel aangepast worden. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-10-07 12:21:53+00:00): Routes lopen nu zo https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/51.9708/4.4901&layers=CN
Ivanerr (2023-11-07 08:09:22+00:00): Привет, а чем не понравился тег crossing=uncontrolled в пути https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1209197347?
literan (2023-11-07 19:44:56+00:00): привет! crossing=uncontrolled это уточняющий тег к основному тегу highway=crossing (а он проставляется именно на точку перехода).

см. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing
Ivanerr (2023-11-08 05:41:29+00:00): Он может ставиться не только на точку но и путь. См раздел how to map
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing%3Duncontrolled

Так и в целом тег crossing применяется на путях в том числе с footway=crossing
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing
literan (2023-11-08 05:59:24+00:00): Вижу. Эту отсебятину год назад внесли, и теперь разные страницы противоречат друг другу.

а давай
literan (2023-11-08 06:01:01+00:00): а давайте весь ОСМ превратим в хаос! в общем, делайте что хотите.
Ivanerr (2023-11-08 06:24:50+00:00): Редактор айди тоже предлагает на выбор тег crossing как для пути перехода, так и для точки. Я думаю это не совсем плохо тк может пригодиться для некоторых потребителей данных osm.
user_5359 (2023-10-07 16:44:44+00:00): Hello! Short hint:  It is technically not possible to serve all payment methods in one place. In this case, it is better to dispense with the entry of possible means of payment.
AndreiDrang (2023-10-07 17:10:11+00:00): Thanks! Will fix.
Adava Pays d'Aix (2023-10-07 06:30:30+00:00): Bonjour, il n'y a pas de bande cyclable ici. Ce sont des accotements qui servent de bande d'arret d'urgence, de stationnement pour véhicule et peuvent être utilisés par les cyclistes si ils le souhaitent mais il n'y aucune signalisation montrant que c'est une bande cyclable, ni panneau ni pictogramme au sol.
Matt_ (2023-10-06 19:40:26+00:00): More dam IDs
MT00931;MT00532;MT03462;MT02766;MT02864;MT03410;MT01040;MT00003;MT00535
Walkabout0 (2023-10-06 20:34:12+00:00): The location is still wrong, it's about 30 metres off.
Walkabout0 (2023-10-06 20:34:38+00:00): It should be right on the corner, where the main entrance is.
eggie (2023-10-06 20:35:35+00:00): Oke...
In dat geval dus highway=path gebuiken ipv footway..
path=desire is meer voor echte olifantenpaadjes, maar als het dat is dan oke.
In het kort..
highway=footway is een officieel wandelpad.. meestal met een G7 bord.
In andere gevallen highway=path gebruiken.
Groet
eggie
eteb3 (2023-10-06 19:57:28+00:00): Forgot to mention further source: OS OpenData StreetView 2016
SomeoneElse (2023-10-07 11:15:08+00:00): Hello,
A quick question about National Cycle Route 1 here https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/254838#map=16/57.1801/-2.1680 - do you know if it goes round to the south of Riverside Quarter as well as round to the north?
Best Regards,
Andy
Weiers Coetser (2023-10-07 13:18:10+00:00): Hi Andy,

I've been looking out for the Route 1 markers and there are markers down Mill Drive but there are also markers that point down Mugiemoss Road. 

Mugiemoss Road used to be the main route before the layout changes, but it does not have cycle lanes or segregated infrastructure. But the new road-layout also means there is through traffic in only one direction while Mill Drive has seperated cycle/walkway but the road is busier. 

I was wondering what the implications are for the NCN1 map. Both routes are signposted and there is not much difference between them.

What I'll do is to go cycle that area again and see if I can photograph or identify the signposts.
Weiers Coetser (2023-10-07 13:32:28+00:00): Hi again, Sorry - I think I may actually be mistaken. I've just scrolled through the Mapillary footage that I have for Mill Drive and there is a sign for NCN 1 that points down Bankhead Road towards Mugiemoss Road. There is no further sign down the Mill Drive. So i think that NCN 1 follows the route that it always followed. I will look out for evidence to the contrary and let you know if I find any.
SomeoneElse (2023-10-07 15:18:12+00:00): Thanks!  Incidentally, you can use http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=254838 and http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=254838 to investigate the current state for odd spurs, etc.
Weiers Coetser (2023-10-07 18:12:58+00:00): Thank you! This is quite interesting and I will definitely investigate.

I've gone to have a look and there is no NCN1 signeage on the Mill Drive section. So I'll try to seperate that cycle track and unlink it from NCN1.

Question: - I see there is another spur in Aberdeen. All that it needs to complete the loop is for a cycle path to be drawn in at the Mounthooly round-about where there is a traffic-light and pedestrian crossing. That will close the spur, but it will mean that there are two possible routes to follow. Does this pose any challenges for the map and for any routing applications? Is the goal to eliminate such loops? Or is it fine to have two options?
SomeoneElse (2023-10-08 09:54:21+00:00): With National cycle routes, I tend to update them to show where the signage actually points, or (if that is "obviously wrong") where a sensible cyclist who is following the route would go.  From looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/254838#map=18/57.15397/-2.10009 , as a non-local I don't think I can really help, except to say that there are plenty of places where (say) northbound traffic goes one way and southbound traffic another.
SomeoneElse (2023-10-08 10:01:50+00:00): One other thing to bear in mind is that since https://www.sustrans.org.uk/about-us/paths-for-everyone/ Sustrans have removed some "on fast road" routes from their national network, so there may be some gaps - although (looking at Sustrans' own maps, which unfortunately I don't think are licence-compatible with OSM) there don't appear to be any such gaps in Aberdeen.
Weiers Coetser (2023-10-08 10:03:12+00:00): Thank you. I will go and double check. I cycle that route regularly and use the crossing there. The map does not show all the traffic lights and pedestrian/cycle crossings. I'll see if the NCN1 signs are obvious enough there.

I have been trying to deal with the spur that I inadvertently created where Mugiemoss connects with Oldmeldrum, but I am having difficulty figuring out how to remove the relation without deleting a much bigger relation. It is more complicated than I thought. The Route 18 bus route is also a challenge. I suspect that the route has changed, given the new road layout, but it needs more investigation.
SomeoneElse (2023-10-08 10:05:51+00:00): There also are places where what is on Sustrans' own maps is "just wrong" - it doesn't match the signage placed by Sustrans volunteers and it doesn't match the route that a cyclist would actually take there.  There was an attempt by a Sustrans volunteer to correct some of these - see this from February this year: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2023-February/030104.html (Ian Dent is a Sustrans volunteer from around Derby, he's popped into some of the virtual OSM East Midlands meetings we've had).
SomeoneElse (2023-10-08 10:10:05+00:00): Re "figuring out how to remove the relation without deleting a much bigger relation" - the way that the "remove" button is shown in the iD editor does look like you're removing the relation, but you're not - you're just removing the way from the relation.
If you click on another way in the relation afterwards you should be able to check that it is still there (and if somehow it isn't, you can always click "undo").
saerdnaer (2025-04-20 17:49:39+00:00): Hi, did you transfer the data manually from bleau.info to JOSM or did where you able to create a half-automated process?
StC (2025-04-22 11:28:40+00:00): Hi, I believe I did it 100% manually and with a tiny bit of local survey too.
StC (2025-04-22 11:37:24+00:00): Mmm. After a deeper search I found CSV files named jaune.csv, bleu.csv and so on. Therefore I probably built these files semi-automatically before loading them in JOSM.
Frans S (2023-10-08 10:13:20+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142247524
DD1GJ (2023-10-06 23:17:23+00:00): Hallo Stonehedge42,

willkommen bei OSM. Welches Problem hat  LG Maps mit den ursprünglichen Wegen? OSM-Daten sollten nicht geändert werden, nur weil eine einzelne Anwendung damit nicht funktioniert.

Viele Grüße, Joachim
Stonehedge42 (2023-10-07 11:58:54+00:00): Hi Joachim,

das ganze ist Projekt von der Uni. Im ersten Schritt besorge ich mir alle OSM Objekte und deren Tagging. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/LGMaps
eggie (2023-10-06 20:49:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback vehicle=no hoeft er niet op. Zeker niet als je er mag fietsen.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
evr_nl (2023-10-07 07:17:59+00:00): Dankjewel voor de uitleg Eggie! Ik had m.b.t. de vehicle niets aangepast.
eggie (2023-10-07 07:50:34+00:00): Top...  Het vehicle=no even aangepast naar motor_vehicle=no Zal in ieder geval dan brommers tegenhouden.
Maar motorvoertuigen is eigen al per default no..Eigenlijk dus overbodig, maar kwaad kan het niet.   vehicle=no is alles met wielen. Dat stond er inderdaad al en tag je om ook fietsers te stoppen. .. maar je mag er dus wel fietsen. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-10-06 20:52:09+00:00): Wanneer het een opengesteld landgoed is dan zal het ook bicycle=permissive zijn ipv yes.

MVG
eggie
evr_nl (2023-10-07 07:23:15+00:00): Dank voor de feedback. Ik twijfelde inderdaad of het "yes" moest zijn of een andere optie, maar kon het niet zo snel vinden op de wiki.
eggie (2023-10-07 07:53:23+00:00): Het routeert op beide manieren.
Het klopt nog niet 100% , want er staat ook een algemene conditionaltag met tijden.   Dat zou genoeg moeten zijn.
accesstags zijn echt lastig. 
gr eggie
DressyPear4 (2023-10-07 22:50:10+00:00): Lotes vazios não são praças
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142248025
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-10-20 23:54:58+00:00): Edições deste usuário foram revertidas, criou praça em todo canto
Hufkratzer (2023-10-07 13:15:41+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1213694837 is a riding arena, isn't it? Riding arenas are usually tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian. There is a preset for riding arenas in iD which does that.
Ydgfb (2023-10-08 04:57:44+00:00): Hi there.
I reverted your changeset because of the tagging of Greenland as a building and frame shop.
In the future, please write more detail changeset comments, it makes it a lot easier for other mappers to understand your intentions in a changeset. :)
Here's the wiki page for writing good changeset comments:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments