piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tux67 (2026-02-19 07:54:53+00:00): Hallo Moehlea,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, dass du mithelfen möchtest, die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Ein Kollege hat gestern schon einige Korrekturen an deinem ersten Changeset vorgenommen. 
Das Kartoffelhaus habe ich gelöscht, da es m.E. dort war wo jetzt die Taverna Mythos ist. Ansonsten verwenden wir Lifecycle Prefixe, wenn Elemente (temporär) geschlossen sind.
Bitte lies dich ein wenig im Wiki ein (place=city_block passte in keinem der Fälle)- ein guter Start ist:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
damit deine Mitmapper deine Interntion und Quellen verstehen.

Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56

Für eine Qualitätssicherung, an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
eggie (2026-02-18 20:12:14+00:00): Graag naam Laadpaal verwijderen. Dat hoort niet op een kaart. Dat is het zelfde als name=huis en name=bankje.
gr eggie
eggie (2026-02-18 20:16:14+00:00): Hoi..
..leisure=playground als hoofdtag?
Gr eggie
eggie (2026-02-18 20:05:00+00:00): Tip  Het gebied van je edits graag klein houden.
Bv een straat. Schuiven met de kaart geeft vaak schade.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-18 20:11:11+00:00): Graag naam Laadpaal verwijderen.
Gr eggie
Marek-M (2026-02-19 09:57:18+00:00): Proszę zapoznać się z zasadami dodawania nazw i obiektów w OpenStreetMap. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy

Znaczna większość Twoich edycji nadaje się do wycofania.
eggie (2026-02-18 20:04:19+00:00): name=Laadpaal graag verwijderen
eggie (2026-02-18 20:03:35+00:00): Dag Dylan.. Haal je name=Parkeergarage weer weg?

MVG
eggie
Frans S (2026-03-11 13:23:55+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please correct the issues shown by the issue triangle before you upload your mappings.
And. when you map a road/path which crosses a waterway, add a watercrossing.
Here the ford tag is to be used.
Best regards
NeisBot (2026-02-18 20:12:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13316716395 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Septic service facility"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-27 05:33:13+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179113573
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-02-18 20:18:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13520040949 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bridal shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-27 05:33:14+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179113574
(No visible changes after review)
osmviborg (2026-02-19 06:18:53+00:00): Er broen åbnet? 'start_date': Date when feature opened or the construction of the feature finished.
hrmmhahmhm (2026-02-19 14:13:00+00:00): Det var ikke et tag jeg har sat på. Men du har ret, det skulle have været opening_date, og ikke start_date.
eggie (2026-02-18 20:33:02+00:00): Dag DM,
Svp niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. 
Dat geeft vaak schade.
Doe zoiets in meerdere uploads.
Mvg
eggie
DutchMaverick (2026-02-27 09:40:29+00:00): Dag eggie,
Bedankt voor de tip. Ik zal niet meer schuiven met de kaart in editmodus en dit soort aanpassingen voortaan opsplitsen in meerdere uploads.
Mvg,
DM
eggie (2026-02-27 09:44:39+00:00): Top!
NeisBot (2026-02-18 20:33:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13520211497 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Liquor store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-27 05:33:14+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179113575
(No visible changes after review)
Frans S (2026-03-29 10:39:51+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please take the width of a trace into consideration to decide what tag to use.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1480401488/history#map=16/34.07571/66.74403
Unclassified is a better choice. The width is about 3 mtr. You can  also see 2 tracks of wheels.
Best regards
JakovBušić (2026-02-19 10:21:41+00:00): Wrong hgv restriction made in this changeset were set right in 178764943. "OptimoRoute"
JuanElDemografo (2026-02-18 21:26:34+00:00): The way you typically address covered drive-throughs is to separate the highway, connect the portion covered to the outline of the building, and add the tag covered=yes. You added the tag layer=-1 to a couple examples here, which implies that the road would be going underground or something. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1377086886 for an example.

Happy mapping :)
Apathetic_Engineer (2026-02-18 21:32:38+00:00): yeah... I did a couple that way based on the suggested edits then read up in the documentation because it didn't seem right. I need to go back and fix those that still have the -1 layer tag. Thanks for the tip on connecting to the outside of the building! I was manual moving nodes
JakovBušić (2026-02-19 10:25:43+00:00): wrong hgv restrictions made in this changeset were set right in 178765158. "OptimoRoute"
flex16 (2026-02-20 16:36:04+00:00): Was man bei diesen Wegen noch beachten sollte finde ich, dass diese teilweise über Privatgrundstück verlaufen laut Alkis.

Stell dir vor du wohnst da und dann werden da ständig die Radfahrer vor der Haustür durchgeroutet.

Meines Erachtens wäre es sinnvoll so etwas wie access=private oder access=destination zu taggen.

Zumal der Umweg für Radfahrer ja auch nur marginal ist.
m_fuhrmann (2026-02-20 20:23:35+00:00): Das ist ein guter Plan. Ich schaue noch mal. Danke
m_fuhrmann (2026-02-22 11:25:00+00:00): Ich habe es auf destination geändert. Danke noch mal!
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-18 20:56:57+00:00): The boundary of a building drawn by user @masoudghorbany in change set 178719429 has been corrected due to it not complying with OSM drawing rules for buildings that share a common wall.
eggie (2026-02-18 21:59:54+00:00): Dag Woody,

Die toegangsweg om op die parking te komen staat met motor_vehicle=destination op slot voor regulier verkeer. 
Moet die tag destination er niet afgehaald worden tot de Landwinkel?

MVG
eggie
nevw (2026-02-19 05:33:03+00:00): Hi, when mapping waterways please draw in the direction the water flows. That is downhill.
Rainero (2026-03-14 23:23:44+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179879077
(unzulässige Quelle)
osmviborg (2026-02-19 06:15:12+00:00): Cykelstien er allerede tagget på vejen som 'cycleway=track'. Enten det ene eller det andet, ikke begge dele.
JakovBušić (2026-02-19 10:43:31+00:00): wrong restrictions made in this changeset were set right in 178765992. "OptimoRoute"
pitfire (2026-02-19 03:28:14+00:00): Hallo Netsrohtreyem,

willkommen bei OSM danke für dein Arrangement. Du hast eine "maxspeed" Änderung vorgenommen, die bei unveränderter Beschilderung in der vorherigen Versionn richtig war. Die 30 gelten nur für den angegebenen Zeitraum: 30 @ (Mo-Fr 07:00-17:00)

VG pitfire
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-18 21:24:19+00:00): @masoudghorbany
In change set 178713486 and 178713486 you have incorrectly registered a building with a common wall for the umpteenth time. You have registered a building that is related to only one business with a boundary and also with a node repeatedly. This is not according to OSM rules. Register and edit according to the rules. I have deleted the boundary in this case, if you still want to register the boundary, register it correctly. Incorrect registrations in large numbers make it difficult for other local editors.
NeisBot (2026-02-18 21:16:39+00:00): 🌍 Bem-vindo ao OSM, luiz aramndo maciel lopes.
Obrigado por contribuir!

Para tornar a colaboração mais fácil e ajudar os outros a entender as suas edições, é melhor adicionar uma breve descrição das alterações que você fez. Comentários claros ajudam a comunidade a seguir o seu trabalho e fornecer feedback melhor. Você pode encontrar dicas para escrever bons comentários aqui[1].

✅ Aqui está um exemplo de comentário com base nas suas edições no mapa: "Adicionei nome à rua, Rua B"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, luiz aramndo maciel lopes.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added name to road, Rua B"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
eggie (2026-02-18 21:38:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Dit is niet correct. De begraafplaats staat al op de kaart. Daar kan dus evt wel nog de naam op, maar niet de functie Begraafplaats.
Ik zal je edits terugdraaien.
Hoe heet deze begraafplaats?

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
ArLan67 (2026-02-18 21:44:20+00:00): Je zal gelijk hebben maar in Magic Earth kan ik geen Begraafplaats in Waardenburg vinden. De tip was dit te veranderen in openstreetmap.
ArLan67 (2026-02-18 21:46:59+00:00): https://www.begraafplaatsinformatie.nl/waardenburg/begraafplaats-in-waardenburg
eggie (2026-02-18 21:47:19+00:00): Ahh.. oke..  Volgens mij staat deze bekend als Algemene Begraafplaats Waardenburg.
Die naam heb ik toegevoegd.
De lokale bevolking zal wel zeggen. We gaan naar de begraafplaats, maar dar geldt eigenlijk voor elke begraafplaats al heeft die ook een officiële naam.
Mapse,
eggie
ArLan67 (2026-02-18 21:51:11+00:00): Dank!
eggie (2026-02-18 21:55:37+00:00): Ook nog even gegoogled.. https://www.afscheidspunt.nl/regios/tiel-en-tielerwaard/instellingen/algemene-begraafplaats-waardenburg/
Je komt ook inderdaad Begraafplaats tegen naast Algemene Begraafplaats Waardenburg.
Up to you... , maar die naam komt dan op het vlak en niet op een node (Dat geeft foutmelding) en ook niet op het 'huisje'. 
Vreemd dat Magic Earth niet landuse=cemetery herkent.
Dat is de tag die op het vlak staat. 
MVG
eggie
ArLan67 (2026-02-18 22:13:23+00:00): Die node moet ik nog ff uitzoeken...beginnersfoutje. Dat huisje had ik idd in het begin aangeklikt. Ook beginnersfoutje. Up to me? Dan lijkt me zoals aangegeven in jouw link Algemene Begraafplaats de goede aanduiding.
eggie (2026-02-18 22:17:32+00:00): Laat je door wat kritiek niet weerhouden om te gaan mappen. 😀
ArLan67 (2026-02-18 22:18:14+00:00): De node heb ik inmiddels opgezocht. Voor de volgende keer...of moet ik dat nu nog doen...up to you!
ArLan67 (2026-02-18 22:19:59+00:00): Nee hoor. Dat weerhoudt me totaal niet. Ik vat het op als positieve feedback. 👍
eggie (2026-02-18 22:24:38+00:00): De wiki klopt volgens mij niet. Daar krijg je de keuze tussen een node of een vlak.
De validator van editor josm geeft bij node een foutmelding. ..landuse hoort op een vlak.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=cemetery
NeisBot (2026-02-18 21:27:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13438354872 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Athletic Fields"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-27 05:33:16+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179113576
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
j numminen (2026-02-18 21:29:38+00:00): Changeset comment was supposed to be: Remove obsolete Laajasalo bus stops; fix bus routes 85/N, 86/K/N
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-19 00:34:18+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1431518557
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1475664203
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1480416247

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ManTop2 (2026-02-18 21:47:21+00:00): yes
Sylabowy Kot (2026-02-19 17:15:43+00:00): Dzięki!
syntex (2026-02-19 17:23:43+00:00): : )
Frans S (2026-03-11 13:40:46+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
PLease tag highways in accordance with this wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Roads
Roads in rural areas are never to be tagged as 'residential roads' 
A track > 2 mtr is not a path. > = unclassified.
When you, like here, map a road with the same width as the one you connect it to, don't change the tagging.
Best regards
Mevess (2026-02-19 06:24:17+00:00): Bien trouvé la clé access=permit, c'est exactement ça
J'ai mis la page wiki osm de Vienne à jour.
Bonne journée
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178745756
Hendrik Helsper (2026-02-18 22:46:23+00:00): Ob der Abschnitt vom Bahnübergang Globusallee bis zum Werkstor auch reaktiviert wird, ist mir nicht bekannt.
NeisBot (2026-02-18 22:51:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/70461525 v8

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-27 05:33:17+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179113578
(No visible changes after review)
divaddivag (2026-02-19 08:26:45+00:00): Bonjour Benoît, y-a-t'il une urgence à tout rapprocher ou as-tu une deadline que je ne connais pas? Si c'est le cas, merci de m'en informer afin que je ne me trompe pas de projet. bonne journée David
benoitdd (2026-02-19 08:56:23+00:00): aucune urgence, juste une proposition de l'administratrice de MGW de commencer par la Normandie, donc je suis passé par là. et j'aime bien résoudre les puzzles, donc les quelques uns que tu as passé m'ont intrigués - et j'y ai passé beaucoup plus de temps que nécessaire :) -
divaddivag (2026-02-19 10:57:35+00:00): Merci pour ton retour. Oui j'ai mis la barre un peu trop haut je pense! J'ai avancé en parallèle du challenge Maproulette en passant en revue la liste des type 1 de la page de MGW que tu as présenté l'autre soir. Pour le 14, il y en a ~700 et à chaque fois j'orthogonalise leur position par d'autres moyens légaux (Commons/imagerie/BD Topo) en plus du terrain que je fais ou peux faire -> le reste étant mis de coté pour le moment, soit ~20aine pour le département. Je suis un peu trop pointilleux, ne le prends pas mal: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12862592644/history  Cela demande de visiter toutes les communes sur Commons pour voir si il n'y a pas un monument non catégorisé, bien lire les inscriptions, visiter les historic=memorial qui traînent dans OSM, vérifier le wikidata etc... bref contrôler l'adéquation MGW<->OSM<-Wikidata<->Commons est très chronophage pour le faire à l'échelle de la région comme ambitionné après la visio, d'où ma question initiale. J'apprécie beaucoup ton initiative donc n'hésites pas à me contacter si tu as besoin d'un coup de main. Bonne journée David
NeisBot (2026-02-18 23:03:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13573365997 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Custom Flooring Store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-27 05:33:17+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179113579
(No visible changes after review)
Joseph R P (2026-02-19 18:57:58+00:00): Secondary is definitely a little low for Route 30 through here, but I probably wouldn't upgrade it anywhere past primary. Route 30 is a cross-country highway, but this particular section really only serves as  a business route linking the real through highways (the Interstates) to the Downtown area of Pocatello.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-02-20 00:58:47+00:00): Okay, I'll go change it. Interestingly, it was already primary, but someone else downgraded it to secondary to "match how locals use the roads."
Joseph R P (2026-02-20 01:37:14+00:00): There are a handful of cases where US Highways can be tagged below primary when they don't serve traffic any differently from another highway tagged below primary in the hierarchy would. Route 30 has a tertiary section around The Dalles, Oregon. In this case, though, I would say that this section of highway in Pocatello shouldn't be secondary based on how the general consensus is that the most direct major roads leading into the downtown of a major city should be primary, which makes sense from a navigational standpoint.
NeisBot (2026-02-19 00:24:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13578295166 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Photo booth rental office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-27 05:33:18+00:00): 🗑️🤖 Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/179113581

 If you believe this deletion was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
CanopyFalls (2026-02-19 13:23:31+00:00): Really good work! Ty for making the map better!

Just wanted to point out a few things that you may find useful:
- In iD you can press "q" to square the corners of areas, this is especially helpful with buildings seeing as they often have square corners.
- iD offers more specific tags than "house" in general, you can actually tag a lot of these as "terraces" and elsewhere the semi-detatched house tag may help as well.
- Buildings that are touching should be joined together, you've done amazing adding separate outlines for each house in a terrace but they all need to be joined together along their edges.

These things are mostly minor, you've made an amazing start to adding map data here where there was none before.

You may want to take a look at my changeset on OSMCha to see how minor the changes to geometry I've made are: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178772232
ChloeEdmondson (2026-02-20 22:29:02+00:00): Thank you this is very helpful
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-02-19 01:25:01+00:00): *and to avoid making the route continuity look so weird*
Natfoot (2026-03-09 07:15:24+00:00): I had to add back the way you deleted. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179565589
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178748307
SafwatHalaby (2026-02-19 21:53:34+00:00): Hello again!

You changed the name to "Genizah" but the feature is still tagged as a kiosk.

The name should be the name only, the way it appears on a sign. Good name examples: McDonald's, Haifa, Tel Aviv University.

Bad name examples: Water Fountain, River, University. This information about the feature and is not a name. We use tags for that.

Here is how to fix this.

1. Zoom to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1480453584 and press the Edit button to open the iD editor

2. under "Feature Type" section, Press the "Kiosk" icon/button and change to "building"

3. Under the "Fields" section, remove "Genizah" from the name. 

4. The "building" tag should say "yes". Change "yes" to "religious". https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=religious marks a general religious building.

5. I couldn't find a tag specifically for a Genizah. I suggest that under the "Tags" section, you add description=Genizah. The description tag is used for free text descriptions when no tags are suitable.
NeisBot (2026-02-19 01:27:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 15 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1480454284 v1 | 15 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178748882
NeisReview (2026-02-27 05:33:19+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178791609
NeisBot (2026-02-19 01:36:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11379859072 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Solar installation facility"

#MapWithoutSpam