piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
LightAsAFeather (2023-02-18 08:38:48+00:00): I'm aware that the Name Suggestion Index will produce warnings of this, but adding "brand not K-Market" is not the answer, as that's clearly not what's on the ground.

The right way to go about this would be to change NSI, as this affects pretty much every K-Market in Finland. The problematic line appears to be this one: https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/blob/128442a48c3a52aafae44cd1f4b89fdc65406415/data/brands/shop/convenience.json#L1934

Maybe we should start a thread about this somewhere more public?
Dodko (2023-02-14 09:23:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164803460
tu už budova bola stačilo aktualizovať adresu a podľa Ortofotomozaika SR poslavili väčší dom ako zapísali do katastra.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/955581912
tu budova existovala adresa sa mala pridať do nej a nie kresliť novú budovu cez prvú

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172376854
odrezať z budovy, prekrýva novú

Pred pridaním adresy/kreslením budovy si treba stiahnuť danú oblasť a tak vidno aký je stav, čo treba upraviť.
GPar (2023-02-14 19:38:32+00:00): Hi,
man_made=beacon seems to be deprecated , see "past usage" here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:airmark%3Dbeacon  
In fact, you deleted it correctly from CLS VOR
mkopinsky (2023-08-24 15:35:09+00:00): Please use descriptive changeset comments when you make updates to the map.

Specific to this edit, please note that addr:housenumber should only contain the number - the street name (which should be East 1st Street to match how the street itself is labeled) should be in addr:street
Dodko (2023-02-14 08:02:59+00:00): Snažte sa budovu zakresliť do pravého uhla, klávesová skratka Q a je trocha väčšia ako je skutočnosť.
https://i.paste.pics/LM2XV.png
Frans S (2023-02-14 09:04:10+00:00): Hello  Bruno. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Your mappings are quite accurate, 
Be sure that you square each rectangular building.
When a waterway crosses a road, a crossing need to be added, bridge, ford or culvert.
There is no need to map every trace leading and ending in farmland. (tracks).
Focus on through going roads, (mostly unclassified)
You must have seen a few warnings of the Issue triangle. Please solve those before you upload your mappings
Best regards and keep mapping
map per (2023-02-14 08:32:26+00:00): Hello adsadvanceddesign,

the address or the location of the office (1) you added doesn't seem to be right. This is Munich and not Woodbridge.

Best regards
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10656999293/history
map per (2023-02-22 15:11:37+00:00): I removed the office from the map now as the address doesn't make sense and I didn't get a response from the user adsadvanceddesign

@adsadvanceddesign:
Did you receive the message I wrote?
user_5359 (2023-03-26 06:32:27+00:00): I recommend to delete the SPAM node completely!
map per (2023-03-26 06:49:18+00:00): I don't really mind, just go ahead if you want to delete the node.

I usually leave a "deactivated" node in cases whre I am not totally sure.
user_8655426 (2023-02-16 09:05:42+00:00): Hello,
Thank you for correcting the Buddhist denominations. However, you have "automatically" rewritten some denominations to the wrong ones.

Example: denomination=jodo_shinshu  ->  denomination=jodo_shu
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/619901207/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372460724/history

There are both jodo_shinshu and jodo_shu in Japan.

Tag:denomination=jodo_shinshu
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:denomination%3Djodo_shinshu

Tag:denomination=jodo_shu
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:denomination%3Djodo_shu

So I asked DWG to revert this changeset. (Ticket#2023021510000148)

Also, this changeset looks like "automated edits". Please read the following Wiki page.

Automated edits (English)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits
solenoid jam (2023-02-16 09:37:34+00:00): Hello.
Thanks for helping me find these bugs. I have corrected them.
Changeset does not automatically change information. The changes affected the erroneous spelling of tags. As a rule, this is the use of capital letters and spaces, as well as typos.
====
Здравствуйте. 
Спасибо за то что помогли найти эти ошибки. Я исправил их.
Changeset не содержит автоматического изменения информации. Изменения коснулись ошибочного написания тэгов. Как правило это использование заглавных букв и пробелов, а так же опечатки.
user_8655426 (2023-02-17 08:20:27+00:00): Hello,
I apologize for replying to another changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132619461

The description of "Key:denomination" differs slightly between the English and Japanese versions.
We Japanese mappers need to revise the Japanese version of the Wiki.  (It appears that tagging policies, etc. have not yet been discussed.)
solenoid jam (2023-02-17 10:51:16+00:00): Hi. 
Mistakes sometimes happen. 

The key "denomination" can be understood differently, because it is not clear whether it belongs to the highest or lowest level of classification. I think that without a global solution, this problem cannot be solved.

https://factsanddetails.com/archives/003/201903/5c7d15149913f.jpg

========
Привет. 
Ошибки иногда случаются. 

Ключ "denomination" может быть по разному понят, поскольку не понятно, к высшему или низшему уровню классификации его относить. Я думаю, что без глобального решения, эта проблема не может быть решена.
DP24PH (2023-02-16 08:45:56+00:00): You may have inadvertently mapped the way that is outside the San Fabian-Bonuan-Dagupan Diversion Road that encroaches on parts of Central Luzon, the entire NCR and Cavite, and the western portion of Laguna. Kindly reduce your changeset boundary to per locality basis on your further edits. Thank you very much.


DP24
PoconoMountains (2023-02-17 06:24:02+00:00): Hello DP24PH, thank you for reaching out. I agree that this changeset boundary is much larger than preferred. It is my intention to keep changesets to a localized area, and I will continue to be cautious of this moving forward.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-14 08:00:35+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/786578488
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250649209

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1145043697

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Piotr Strębski (2023-02-14 20:32:27+00:00): Zrobione
Dodko (2023-02-14 08:16:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/197680809
tu nemá byť číslo 78
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/ra_adresne_body/0/13765825?pos=49.053273,18.964470,18
StefanHRT (2023-02-14 08:32:09+00:00): Hallo, Du hast den Fußweg und nicht die Straße geändert ;) VG
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-25 13:24:05+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521837566/history has shop = pizza that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=pizza ? Is it amenity=fast_food cuisine=pizza or amenity=restaurant cuisine=pizza by any chance? Or are they selling pizza not ready to eat? Or ingredients for pizza?
OSM FTW (2023-02-17 14:59:34+00:00): почему building:levels используеться на POI? если нужно указать на каком этаже, то это addr:floor и/или level.
Zavgor1990 (2023-02-17 15:07:04+00:00): При заполнении подразумевал количество этажей, которые занимает фирма. То, что тег levels привязан к билдингу, не заметил, т.к. в списки тегов не заходил. На будущее эту привязку учту.
okadatsuneo (2023-03-03 10:45:43+00:00): こんにちは。
下記のwikiは神社の例ですが、寺院も代表点(または敷地)のみにamenity=place_of_worshipをつける運用となっています。
ですので、お手数ですが元に戻していただけますでしょうか。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:religion%3Dshinto

よろしくお願いします。
Irfan_Muriy (2023-02-18 04:12:31+00:00): terima kasih
kapazao (2023-02-14 12:56:20+00:00): Please, try to add the access tag. Most of the swimming pools are private and it is important to know it.
Also it would be better if you do not use nodes and use areas to draw them using PNOA imagery.
Thank you for your contributions.
Regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132525458
escribis (2023-02-27 17:23:18+00:00): Hola kapazao :-)

>>> it would be better if you do not use nodes and use areas to draw them using PNOA 

I agree with you but the fact is that I'm contributing with openstreetmap with a mobile phone (mostly using OSM go).  I understand that it would be nice to drawi the shape of swimming pools but this is simply not feasible with such a device. I believe that while, not optimal, having the location of swimming pools is still valuable information (this is just a personal belief). In fact, in many regions of spain less than 1% of swimming pools are indicated, leaving something like 99% totally blank. Sometimes a dozen are drawn while many thousands around are simply not indicated. Like missing maps :-) Knowing how many pools are there and where could be use for some automation. I take care of having changesets with only swimming pools so it should be easy to revert a change and then draw the shapes. What is amazing is that some region like the "cumbre del sol" there are thousands of swimming pools. Only very few were indicated on the map.

>>> Please, try to add the access tag. Most of the swimming pools are private and it is important to know it. 

Ok, I will check how to do this. In  many cases this information is clear. But for the rest I guess that this information should be better provided by people on the ground. 

With respect to this particular changeset 132525458, please feel free to revert the changeset and draw the shapes. This should be rather easy on a labtop.

Best regards
gmar5 (2023-02-14 13:26:34+00:00): Hi. A viewpoint is already mapped just nearby, where the bench is (there might also be a plaque?).
Regarding the name: Jarn Mound is more to the south (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55802655). Despite its elevated position, it is not currently a viewpoint, because of overgrown trees (at least last time I have been).
Leo Slager (2023-02-14 12:33:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2023-02-14 12:41:34+00:00): dag Lotte,
De twee gewijzigde objecten liggen ver uit elkaar. Schuiven met de kaart in de edit modus kan tot grote schade leiden. Soms heb je een punt geselecteerd en dat wordt dan ongemerkt mee gesleept over zo'n grote afstand.
Beter is om dan het eerste punt als changeset af te sluiten. Dan uit de edit modus en dan pas de kaart verschuiven om het tweede punt te gaan bewerken.

Veel succes met verder mappen.
Leo Slager (2023-02-14 12:54:33+00:00): Als alleen de naam wordt toegevoegd, zal deze niet op de kaart verschijnen.
Er moet dus ook worden toegevoegd wat het is. bijvoorbeeld: amenity=restaurant.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity
ik pas het even aan.
Leo Slager (2023-02-14 13:04:27+00:00): En bij NAHKracht heb ik toegevoegd:
office=company
taketaketake (2023-03-15 08:59:07+00:00): 県道103号　若桜湯村温泉線を
bicycle:no
horse:no
motor_vehicle:no
とされていますが本当ですか？
また、多くの説明が「基盤地図情報2500、または、地理院地図にて追加。」となっていますが何を追加したんでしょうか？
mcdlee (2023-03-30 07:40:29+00:00): 感謝更新區段徵收的資訊

話說 畜牧用地應該也被徵收了吧 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/284163673)

不過我查得到的空照圖都還沒更新，也不太容易到現場查核，可以請幫忙確認一下嗎?
Hufkratzer (2023-02-15 00:55:59+00:00): Hi,
Congratulations on your first changeset!
But you have
* removed the tag building=yes from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388521673/history ; therefore this building is no longer rendered as a building on the map
* tagged this building and the riding arenas as leisure=horse_riding which is the wrong tag for these.
Please see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778923724
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/945872752
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996881706
archie (2023-02-14 12:06:45+00:00): Hej, även här har du infört fel i multipolygonen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1239735). 
Vänligen lär dig först om hur multipolygoner fungerar i wikin innan du rör dem.  
Det är bra att du kompletterar editeringarna här, men du förstör samtidigt andra kartritares arbete.
GUFSZ (2023-02-14 10:30:02+00:00): Wer die Wege nach den Bauarbeiten wiederherstellen will, hier kann er das vorherige Tagging nachsehen.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1rk8
jodd (2023-02-17 19:53:09+00:00): Hi GUFSZ,
ich möchte dir einen Tipp geben: Wenn Wege/Straßen zur Baustelle werden, ist es sinnvoll zu erhalten, was für ein Straßentyp es ist (siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction).

Beispiel: Aus dem Weg

highway=footway

wird dann

highway=construction
construction=footway

Könntest du dir das für deine Änderungen anschauen? Danke :-)

VG jodd
GUFSZ (2023-02-18 16:17:21+00:00): Guckst Du bitte drüber, ob es jetzt passt?
jodd (2023-02-20 17:09:19+00:00): Die ways finde ich jetzt gut. Was mir aber gerade noch aufgefallen ist: Kann es sein, dass du auch allen nodes versehentlich ein highway=construction verpasst hast?
GUFSZ (2023-02-20 18:02:23+00:00): Das ist anzunehmen. Ich habe es geändert.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-14 10:40:39+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897124016
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897124603

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Piotr Strębski (2023-02-14 20:21:12+00:00): Poprawione
aTarom (2023-02-14 20:04:50+00:00): Hola, vmitjans,
gràcies per editar,
et canvio l'addr:street
"addr:street"="Anoia"
per
"addr:street"="Carrer del Riu Anoia"
els validadors donen error si no troben el valor del name de la via propera exactament escrit
Salutacions
Tjuro_Global (2023-02-18 07:36:02+00:00): Hello,

I see that you have added some landuse=village_green. Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dvillage_green
Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?

Greetings Tjuro
DaveF (2023-02-14 11:58:14+00:00): This is /not/ a McColl's. The fact I corrected it just yesterday should have been a clue.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/676788755

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.3887552,-2.3619239,3a,75y,46.56h,85.42t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s3ialSDFZmgjCsHpgYj0sLg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

How many others are in your changeset?
Robert Whittaker (2023-02-14 12:10:56+00:00): Yes, It's a "Martin's", hence the band=* tag. Rightly or wrongly, NSI has assigned brand:wikidata=Q16997477 to these as well. https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=brands&k=shop&v=newsagent&tt=martin%27s . It's not entirely wrong, since both fascia's are trading names of the same parent McColl's brand.

Personally, I'd like to see a separate brand:wikidata=* value for Martin's (it's already on my OSM To Do list), but it will need NSI to be updated as well, otherwise iD will be 'suggesting' everyone changes it back. At least with the brand=Martin's values set, it should be straightforward to change to a more specific brand:wikidata value when one is available (which is better than some previous NSI tagging decisions).
Robert Whittaker (2023-02-14 12:14:35+00:00): If you disagree with any of the NSI pre-sets that are used in iD, then you can file issues at https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/issues . There was some previous discussion on this one at https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/issues/1273 .
Robert Whittaker (2023-02-14 12:44:45+00:00): Wikidata item for Martin's now created: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q116779207 , and pull request submitted to NSI: https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/pull/7775
UKChris (2023-02-14 20:56:37+00:00): The pull request has been accepted, and will be live next week.
DaveF (2023-02-28 21:34:08+00:00): @Robert
I fail to see how you could have misinterpreted what I said.

It is *not* a McColls. There is *no* chain. There is *no* branding. There is *no* NSI. There is *no* Wikidata.

Please revert.

Again, how many other false amendments have you made?
Robert Whittaker (2023-02-28 22:25:41+00:00): I'm really sorry if I've mis-undersrood the issue here. I assumed you were complaining about the addition of the brand:wikidata tag that pointed to the Wikidata entry for McColls. That was added following the NSI preset at the time, based on an exact name match of "Martin's". (Given UK trademark law, I though it very unlikely that a convenience store called "Martin's" could be anything other than part of the McColl-owned Martin's branded chain.) That wikidata tag now been altered by another mapper to the newly created wikidata entry for Martin's.

But presumably that's not the issue you were raising originally. Apologies again for misunderstanding. Perhaps you could explain exactly what the issue is, as I'm still not sure. Are you saying it's an independent shop and not part of the Martin's brand?

(If so, it would have been helpful if you said this explicitly in the changeset comments, or left a note=* tag on the object, when you removed the brand tags from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/676788755/history . Also, should the name be put back to "Martins Local", as you mapped it originally? Note that I haven't altered the name. Had it been named "Martin's Local", or if there had been a note tag explaining it wasn't part of the Martin's brand, it would not have been included in my recent changeset. )
DaveF (2023-03-05 18:59:50+00:00): "Are you saying it's an independent shop and not part of the Martin's brand?"

Yes. 

Again, how many other false amendments have you made?
Robert Whittaker (2023-03-06 12:52:31+00:00): Ok, thanks. I've removed the brand tags, added a not:brand:wikidata (to prevent iD suggesting an incorrect change again) and added a human-readable note to alert other editors.
Robert Whittaker (2023-03-06 13:07:33+00:00): To answer your question, I'm sure I've made hundreds of errors while editing OSM. But hopefully the small relative number is more the outweighed by the positive contributions.

But on these particular changes, I'd be surprised if there were any errors on existing objects that were correctly tagged. As I already said, it would be very unlikely for a convenience store or newsagent to be called "Martin's" and not be part of the McColl's owned chain. For objects that were incorrectly tagged (such as the shop you pointed out, where the name in OSM was incorrect), then mistakes are more likely. But I think that's less of an issue, as in some sense the error was already there.

Anyway, prompted by your concerns I reviewed all the "OSM Objects not matched to list" at https://osm.mathmos.net/chains/Q116779207/ . (We can be confident all the matched objects are genuine Martin's stores.) There were only 5 where I could not verify (using e.g. Google Streetview and/or other OSM-incompatible sources) that there was a McColl's owned Martin's store at the site previously. Three locations are in pedestrianised shopping areas with no imagery available, but the brand tags on those weren't added by me. For the other two, imagery showed them to be similarly-named non-McColl's stores. One was the one you've pointed out already. The other had the brand tags added by someone following iD's suggestion.

So I think we can say that there were most likely no other "false amendments" in this changeset.
Robert Whittaker (2023-03-06 13:37:23+00:00): As you can see from https://osm.mathmos.net/chains/Q116779207/ the far bigger issue is that previously mapped Martin's stores have since closed. But now we have the brand tags added, it means that it's straightforward for QA tools to flag up discrepancies for editors to re-survey. Have you had a look at https://osm.mathmos.net/survey/ in your local area?
marc__marc (2023-07-28 16:58:45+00:00): Bonjour,
c'est toujours en construction ? j'ai lu un article qu'elle avait été inaugurée en mai, mais cela ne disait pas si c'était encore en chantier ou finit
Cordialement,
Marc
lefuturiste (2023-02-14 11:38:55+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre contribution, d'après les informations de je dispose tout de suite, je ne trouve pas que modifier le status d'une route qui sert à accéder à une "Halte Garderie" de "highway=residential" à "highway=tertiary" soit pertinent. En effet, le wiki OSM précise bien que les highway=tertiary sont des "Routes reliant généralement des villages ou des hameaux, ou encore des quartiers à l’intérieur d'une grande ville.", Or ici il s'agit pour l'instant d'une rue pour accéder à un bâtiment, c'est plus highway=service. 
Est-ce qu'il y a une raison non visible sur les imageries actuelles, (par exemple urbanisation de cette zone) qui expliquerais le changement de status  ?
Merci.
SaintMarcel (2023-02-14 14:59:03+00:00): Bonjour, 

Oui en effet, la commune projette de créer un pôle santé au bout de cette rue, et d'ouvrir ses abords à l'urbanisation dans le cadre de la révision générale du PLU. 

Cette demande de modification du statut de la route découle d'un constat réalisé sur google maps, qui ne représente pas toute la largeur de la rue et fait figurer uniquement une sente qui croise cette rue. 

A terme, la rue des maraichers, va accueillir 6 professionnels de santé, une maison multigénérationnelle, un arrêt de bus et le relais assistante maternelle existant. A horizon 2025, c'est tout un nouveau quartier qui se developpera sur les abords de cette voie. 

Voici les raisons de cette demande de modification du statut de cette voie.
lefuturiste (2023-02-14 15:56:32+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre message. plusieurs points :
- Votre action n'étais pas "une demande de modification" mais bien une modification de la carte qui a donc eu effet immédiatement. (Juste pour mettre au clair)
- Vous dites que la modification a eu lieu après un constat réalisé sur Google Maps. Hors, Google Maps n'a absolument rien à voir avec OpenStreetMap. Les données sont séparés. OpenStreetMap est une carte collaborative libre alors que Google Maps est une carte propriétaire en grande partie non modifiable. Une modification sur OpenStreetMap ne va donc pas affecter le rendu de Google Maps.
- De plus, modifier le classement d'une rue sans connaître la signification sémantique juste pour changer le rendu est une mauvaise pratique : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Taguer_pour_le_rendu

Je vous invite à vous renseigner sur la signification de l'étiquette tertiaire : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dtertiary
Et de potentiellement reconsidérer le classement de cette route.

Je serais ravis de discuter avec vous même par conversation téléphonique ou même de vive voix afin de vous éclairer dans la prise en main de la plateforme OSM.
SaintMarcel (2023-02-14 16:12:20+00:00): Bonjour, 

merci pour votre retour et ces précisions à ce propos. 

J'avais à l'esprit ceci pour le statut des voies : https://collectivitesviables.org/articles/hierarchie-des-voies-urbaines.aspx ce qui doit à priori différer du vocable utilisé par openstreetmap. 

Il me semblait que Google Maps piochait dans open street map ses mises à jours, ce qui avait été le cas pour la création de la rue Marie de lampérière sur la commune de Saint-Marcel qui avait été suivie d'une reprise assez rapide par google maps. 

Nous pouvons échanger par téléphone jeudi ou vendredi ou la semaine prochaine si vous le souhaitez voici ma ligne directe : 

02 32 64 23 41 

Cordialement 

Antoine Delabove
lefuturiste (2023-02-14 16:19:56+00:00): Merci beaucoup, j'appellerais jeudi ;)
kocurpl (2023-03-03 16:48:05+00:00): https://www.gov.pl/web/gddkia-gdansk/zrid-na-druga-jezdnie-obwodnicy-slupska

Można już wystawić drogę jako w budowie.
Grass-snake (2023-02-14 12:28:41+00:00): Ошибся, подложка: Esri World Imagery [0.00; 0.00]
Название пакета правок:
Автобус 37: Автовокзал Клин → Автостанция Солнечногорск (городской округ Клин и Солнечногорск, Московская область)
aTarom (2023-02-14 15:22:02+00:00): Hola happymapper,
gracias por editar, una pregunta, que significa
"mtn"="yes"?
x ejemplo en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193208611/history
Saludos
happymapper (2023-02-14 15:28:02+00:00): perdon, es mtb - voy a cambiarlo
aTarom (2023-02-14 16:10:20+00:00): Perfecto!! muchas gracias por corregirlo y por responder
Yabba (2023-02-14 20:26:48+00:00): Das war kein Spam! Wie kommst Du auf die Idee?!