piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SekeRob (2024-08-26 05:17:41+00:00): The groynes not affixed to land being part of the relation looks odd, I wouldn't.
In a few hours OSMI should be updating. It's strange for this issue showing up 8 days after the last mod on the rel also highlighting the relations for the sub areas in the south and see now sow blue lines and duplicate ways being flagged
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=15.83321&lat=39.78057&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cwayshttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=15.83321&lat=39.78057&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways incl a isle offshore.

TTYL
user_177389 (2024-08-26 13:47:21+00:00): The groynes:

This structure does not disturb the relations and OSMI was not bothered by it either. The corresponding changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155367049

The Blue Lines:

The error occurred today, changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155735855

I will correct that too.
user_177389 (2024-08-26 14:05:16+00:00): sorry, yesterday afternoon, is corrected

It is better to identify the actual error directly and make the user responsible aware of it.
SekeRob (2024-08-26 14:12:33+00:00): 👍👍👍
mavl (2024-11-13 06:01:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159076867, 159076813, 159076848 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
VLD549 (2024-09-24 13:59:14+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify the name change from 4 Seasons slagerij versmarkt to Kjure Natuurvoeding. Could you provide a link of some sort that shows that to be the name? I can only find Kjure on a different location.
https://www.kjure.com/#Store-Locator

Thank you!
BrunoVQM (2024-09-24 14:48:34+00:00): Hi, '4 seizoenen slagerij versmarkt' has been closed for many years (due to bankruptcy). The building is now being used by 'Kjure Natuurvoeding' as a production facility for their food, which they then sell in vending machines. This location is not a shop or selling location, that's why this location does not appear in their list of selling locations on the website. But if you go to the contact page on their website (https://www.kjure.com/nl/contact), this building is clearly mentioned as their main location. I live very close to this site and can confirm the correctness of the data. Kind Regards.
VLD549 (2024-10-04 12:37:12+00:00): Thank you for the explanation and the effort!
Jarek 🚲 (2024-10-11 18:05:43+00:00): Hi,

Can you point to what exactly on the wiki you read that made you believe this should be a highway=service?

My gut feeling is that paths should be tagged according to their prevalent use, and the small trackless train running on it April to October doesn't necessarily make it not a path. As another example, city parks dept vehicles (including pickup trucks) regularly drive on park paths or on Martin Goodman Trail. But I'd like to make sure I'm not completely off-base here.

Cheers,
Jarek
RockTeam (2024-10-13 13:14:13+00:00): Hello Jarek,

There is a road sign in front of the entrance to the passageway (https://maps.app.goo.gl/QYoxFXcWBGG9fwm9A) indicating whether it's a service road or train operates on it. It is not shown on the image.

Also, according to this wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice) it seems more likely to be a service road. However, recently, I found that highway=service for busways is now deprecated.
Jarek 🚲 (2024-10-14 01:40:46+00:00): Sorry I'm not sure I understand.

The Google image is not that clear, but from memory I think that sign says something like "no vehicles except authorized"?

Do you think that any piece of pavement in a Toronto park that has a sign "no vehicles except authorized" should be a highway=service? Because that's going to include a _lot_ of ways that are in practice overwhelmingly used by pedestrians.
RockTeam (2024-10-16 00:00:01+00:00): Hello Jarek,

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath

"A highway=path is not for use by four-wheeled (two-track) vehicles. Often the path is simply too narrow."

I think this is an incorrect comparison, as city parks department vehicles, including pickup trucks, can drive on any pavement or even without pavement at all.
Jarek 🚲 (2024-11-29 17:20:15+00:00): Hi, 

Sorry for delay replying here.

I can agree that highway=path is a little problematic.

One issue is that there isn't a widely-accepted definition of what a path actually is, and there's a lot of discussion in the community right now. Some examples:
- https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/pathway-for-ways-not-used-by-or-intended-for-cars/118981
- https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/documenting-the-problems-with-highway-path/119103
- https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/history-of-proposals-to-fix-highway-path-ambiguity-and-a-wayforward/118877
- https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/documenting-solution-proposals-for-highway-path/119773

So for this case I think the problem we're seeing is that this is what we could call "a wide pathway" but there's no agreement on whether it's a highway=path

In Canadian terms, its built form is similar to a multi-use path or a shared-use path. Some of these are indeed wide enough for a car to drive on. There's no general agreement on how to tag those. Some that are primarily used by cyclists get by with highway=cycleway and possibly foot=yes, for example the trail over the Humber bridge https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33398082 or the Humber River Trail https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/873348032

In this case I don't think it should be a cycleway, because cyclists aren't really the primary or usually not even half of the users (partly due to hills, partly due to frequent crowding with pedestrians).

But what I don't like here is a highway=service tag. I read that tag as a car-focused tag, or at least car-first. To me, highway=service are laneways leading to garages, or in High Park, the service roadway leading to the greenhouses https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14345156 - it's not really where you'd walk as recreation.

What do you think about tagging this path as highway=footway? It would align with its primary use. We could tag width=* to indicate the size. Alternatively, for "more substantial" foot paths, there's highway=pedestrian - and that's used on Spring Road and Deer Pen Road within High Park - so it could be an option here too.

For the path along the bottom of the pond, along The Queensway, I would actually suggest highway=cycleway? It's similar in practice to the ravine/river trails or the Humber bridge.

Cheers,
Jarek
RockTeam (2024-12-01 15:49:40+00:00): Hello Jarek,

Yes, that seems quite plausible given the Canadian reality. Can you help make the changes accordingly? Thank you.
Jarek 🚲 (2024-12-06 03:04:02+00:00): I made the change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159978906 - thanks!
Alexey Vazhnov (2024-08-18 13:15:05+00:00): Thank you!
eggie (2024-08-17 16:16:05+00:00): Hoi,

Goed gelukt zo te zien en in ieder geval actueel nu. 

MVG
eggie
Qartezy (2024-08-17 17:44:20+00:00): Dear Khidistavi,

This is an article about Yaradullu, which I would like for you to read to: https://en.insamer.com/forgotten-exclaves-of-azerbaijan_3446.html
Qartezy (2024-08-17 17:47:36+00:00): Also, why did you change the border?
Khidistavi (2024-08-18 07:01:48+00:00): 1) In the article you mentioned regarding Yaradullu there is only one phrase:

"Two unnamed agricultural lands, parallel to the village of Yaradullu in Azerbaijan's Agstafa District, are referred to as Azerbaijani exclaves. These areas are also under Armenian occupation."

I don't know how this relates to my edit, but I'll explain it to you: On the Soviet topographic map K-38-103 1:100 000, two small exclaves belonging to Azerbaijan SSR and surrounded by the territory of Armenian SSR are indeed marked. I saw them, but considering that the local community decided to remove the large exclaves of Yuxarı Əskipara, Artsvashen and others, I decided not to map them, since until the delimitation of the Armenian-Azerbaijani border is complete, the status of any exclaves is unclear.

2) When changing the interstate boundary between Armenia-Azerbaijan, I am primarily guided by the Soviet topographic maps I mentioned above.
Qartezy (2024-08-18 18:26:50+00:00): Oh, and unrelated question but, why are the borders that defines the border between the Republic of Armenia, and Azerbaijan, not the same border as the map shown when you zoom out?
rempshaener (2024-08-18 17:58:50+00:00): Hallo,
zu diesem Turm eine Anmerkung:
Es ist richtig, dass (zu) häufig building statt man_made getaggt wird. Und es gibt Graubereiche (z.B. Silos). Bei Türmen wie diesem sehe ich aber die Gebäudeeigenschaft erfüllt - dann ist es oft richtiger, beides zu taggen.
Viele Grüße
RobotFK (2024-08-20 16:23:57+00:00): Hallo,

Danke für den Hinweis.
Die Eintragung wurde über SCEE vorgenommen, und mir war zu dem Zeitpunkt nicht bekannt das dieses Verhalten auftritt.

Ich werde den Turm korrigieren
pitscheplatsch (2024-08-18 06:56:25+00:00): Hi Ardiles Aleixo, welcome to OSM.

Just a test?

Thanks.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-08-18 12:02:55+00:00): When there are more than one shop/POI in a single building, please use a node instead of adding the shop to the whole builidng. Thanks!
Lumikeiju (2024-08-17 16:15:38+00:00): Many thanks for working on this! <3
tjhorner (2024-08-17 16:30:59+00:00): For information about this import, see the wiki page and community forum discussion:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/tjhorner-import

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposed-import-of-king-county-metro-gtfs-bus-stops/116931
pwbriggs (2026-01-08 00:16:27+00:00): FYI: extra stop at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12117034894

Thanks for the import; I'll merge that one.
eggie (2024-08-17 16:07:47+00:00): Dag Molensteen. Je pad heb ik doorverbonden met de toegangsweg. Het zou anders niet routeren.

MVG
eggie
molensteen (2024-09-28 20:27:56+00:00): Dankjewel Eggie, dat is behulpzaam van u
jmarchon (2024-08-19 00:47:21+00:00): Looks good! Welcome to OSM! I've added a space you missed in the phone number. No big deal, probably just a typo.
Snusmumriken (2024-08-17 15:54:00+00:00): Hej

Tänkte påpeka att det där inte är korrekt angivet för opening hours på Oolong Tea House. Du behöver inkludera vilka veckodagar öppettiderna gäller för, så som det var tidigare
deob83 (2024-08-17 17:09:20+00:00): Hej! Det är korrekt syntax enligt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours/specification och betyder alltså att det är samma öppettider varje dag, oavsett veckodag. Every Door anger öppettiderna på kortast möjliga form med samma betydelse, så "Mo-Su" förkortades bort här. Men jag kan lägga till det igen, och har gjort det nu.
Snusmumriken (2024-08-17 17:21:54+00:00): Kände inte till den regeln. Man lär sig något nytt varje dag.
NeisBot (2024-08-17 15:41:52+00:00): Ooops, it seems that some of your names are a bit unusual ...

Amount=1
#NeisLab #Minutely #Naming
pitscheplatsch (2024-08-21 09:50:00+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/155405814
APneunzehn74 (2024-08-18 18:33:03+00:00): Hallo, erst einmal vielen Dank fürs eintragen. Was mir aufgefallen ist, ein grade1 Wege müsste asphaltiert, betoniert oder gepflastert sein, wenn nicht ist es ein grade2 Weg und bist du dir bei fine_gravel sicher, oder ist das eher ein compacted Oberfläche. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype?uselang=de
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface?uselang=de
Grüße APneunzehn74
EMTBMike (2024-08-20 12:35:42+00:00): Danke fürs Feedback.
Habe die Wege nochmal angepasst. 
Ist für einen Neuling oft etwas verwirrend, aber das wird schon. :-)
jmarchon (2024-08-19 00:48:52+00:00): Thanks for getting this added!
AntMadeira (2024-08-18 11:46:13+00:00): Hello.
This changeset altered admin boundaries, moving polygons and connecting a highway to an admin boundary. Please, deactivate the boundary layer in iD before making editions, to avoid changing admin boundaries.
I've reverted this changeset to correct the boundaries to their official status.. Please, redo your editions.

Regards,
António Madeira.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155377528
mavl (2024-11-13 06:01:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159076867, 159076813, 159076848 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
eggie (2024-08-17 16:09:57+00:00): Oke, but now the addresses are mixedup. 
Please have a look here.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=155377858

Greetz,
eggie
DeepakGulati (2024-08-17 16:16:56+00:00): Thank you for catching this. I've made a couple of changes that fix the address and name.
eggie (2024-08-17 16:27:12+00:00): Oke Top
MDe (2024-08-21 20:53:11+00:00): Pour l'avoir pratiqué, la piste existe...
lucassiste (2024-08-22 16:03:51+00:00): Bonjour,
Mon itinéraire passait par ce chemin, je pensais m'être trompé en me trouvant sur le chemin parallèle et qui est de meilleure qualité. 
Je l'ai supprimé pour éviter les conflits et les doutes qu'il peut y avoir, et que par défauts lorsqu'on trace un itinéraire (sur openrunner par exemple) on prenne l'autre chemin de meilleure qualité, et qu'on ne se pose pas de question.
Glassman (2024-08-18 19:12:51+00:00): I noticed you updated the tags on Rainy River Rail Lift bridge. Did you know that the bridge collapsed? See https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/rail-bridge-collapses-us-canada-border-112898270. Are you familiar with the bridge or just updating rail tags? Be good if someone familiar with it could map it as closed.
wolfy1339 (2024-08-18 19:18:13+00:00): That ABC news article is talking about the wrong bridge. 
The bridge that collapsed is on the Fort Frances to Thunder Bay line (Fort Frances Subdivision) and not the one on the US/Canada border crossing the Rainy River.

I updated the proper bridge.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159175209
wolfy1339 (2024-08-18 19:21:48+00:00): Here are some better factual sources of this event :

https://northernontario.ctvnews.ca/cn-begins-repairs-after-railway-bridge-collapse-in-northern-ontario-1.7003338

https://www.mprnews.org/story/2024/08/15/bridge-collapse-closes-ontario-rail-line-just-north-of-minnesota-border

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdhNePSeqRo

https://fftimes.com/news/local-news/cn-lift-bridge-collapses/
Glassman (2024-08-18 19:30:02+00:00): Thanks for fixing the right bridge. And you can see why I didn't want to be the one to close the wrong bridge.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-17 16:20:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4268022854
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1088103012

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
tjhorner (2024-08-17 16:31:14+00:00): For information about this import, see the wiki page and community forum discussion:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/tjhorner-import

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposed-import-of-king-county-metro-gtfs-bus-stops/116931
bxl-forever (2024-08-18 10:24:59+00:00): Hello,

I think the "via" node is wrong here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17945654

You probably meant the intersection itself.

For the record, I wonder why you want to create so many restriction relations; is there a problem with some router that suggests U-turns on ordinary ways?  Should that occur, this is probably something better fixed in the software itself.
Kamerijker (2024-08-18 12:35:54+00:00): I do not know why the via node was there in the first place (it is a pedestrian crossing), but the router of Organic Maps uses that node and its u-turn possibility to get from Demaeghtlaan coming from Brussel to Meiboom. Hence the reason for the change. To prevent more router mistakes I changed other via nodes with U-turns in that area because they are just physically impossible.
bxl-forever (2024-08-18 14:04:32+00:00): The road structure was simplified on July 20 because it was incorrectly drawn as two carriageways.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154192222

Maybe you are the one who wrote the note here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4341109 

What does your local copy or Organic Maps look like?  If you see Auguste Demaeghtlaan as two parallel roads, then you still have the old data on your phone.
Kamerijker (2024-08-18 15:36:52+00:00): My copy of Organic Maps is the latest one with OSM data August 10, with Auguste Demaeghtlaan as one carriage way. The U-turn they plan is not at the intersection but further down at the pedestrian crossing node because that node has a possibility of U- turn. Why is it coded with this possibility?
bxl-forever (2024-08-18 16:20:01+00:00): Thanks for your reply.

I have been looking at the list of issues on Organic Maps repo, they currently have about [2,350 open tickets](https://github.com/organicmaps/organicmaps/issues) with bugs, and some open issues are about strange routing behaviour.  Because OSM data does not contain anything special here about those crossings, no sensible router should ever suggest that cars make a U-turn there.
So, your relation may be a good fix for this one—I have just tested on fresh data and it will now suggest a loop through the adjacent car park, I am not sure this is a good suggestion either—but they will definitely need to fix their own algorithm.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-17 16:40:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12033695636
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299078467

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Michoo (2024-08-18 14:57:37+00:00): Już poprawione.
Volodymyr Rohozhyn (2024-09-21 18:42:33+00:00): Now it's really hard to make your way through all these thickets, brushwoods...
ftrebien (2024-08-18 17:06:21+00:00): Olá. Pode informar onde essas imagens estão sendo publicadas? São do HOT?
ftrebien (2024-08-18 18:40:08+00:00): Hm acho que você provavelmente baixou o arquivo TIFF da imagem do INPE publicada no OpenAerialMap.
sulriograndense (2024-08-18 18:58:40+00:00): Opaaa!

Sim, são imagens do CBERS-4A, do INPE. Fiz upload para o OAM, apesar de não estar nos melhores ajustes alguma coisa da pra ver. Tenho o TIFF original, que abro no QGis, mas fazendo upload lá (no OAM) facilita bastante pra usar no josm.
ftrebien (2024-08-19 12:14:42+00:00): Com certeza facilita! Sabe se tem outras imagens recentes no catálogo do INPE, em particular próximo de Rio Pardo, Cachoeira do Sul ou Agudo, que também foram muito afetadas pelas enchentes?
sulriograndense (2024-08-20 00:42:56+00:00): Cara, tem sim, mas o catálogo de imagens tá fora e redirecionando pro TerraBrasilis (sistema de queimadas e desmatamento). To procurando pra ver se acho em algum lugar os arquivos do CBERS. Qualquer coisa me manda mensagem aqui no OSM que recebo notificação e lembro de ver se tem algo ou está normal já!
sulriograndense (2024-08-20 00:44:19+00:00): Tenho também que renderizar a imagem que editei no qgis pra fazer upload no OAM no lugar da que tá agora (essa pelas cores quase não se enxerga nada!), mas só lembro quando estou no notebook, daí demora demaaais hahaha
sulriograndense (2024-08-20 01:23:35+00:00): Tenta procurar aqui, usa CBERS-4A WPM e seta a localização. Baixa e abre com o qgis pra ajustar a imagem (cores). Hoje já fornecem as bandas fusionadas, facilita bastante. https://data.inpe.br/bdc/explorer/explore

Tenta ainda por aqui http://www.dgi.inpe.br/catalogo/ e ve se abre, pra mim só pelo celular abriu algumas vezes, é o principal. Qualquer dúvida chama no privado.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-23 00:49:12+00:00): Please provide sources for features not visible on imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155381179
Metzor (2024-08-18 07:51:45+00:00): Hi NoName4all,

Thanks for improving the map data :-)

Note that in OpenStreetMap, the ground floor is level=0. So L'Osteria should get level=1

This is explained in the wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level#Ground_floor_number

I already corrected it. Maybe Vaude also needs correction?

Best regards and happy mapping
Metzor
NoName4all (2024-08-18 09:19:06+00:00): Thanks Metzor. I changed vaude as well.
Metzor (2024-08-18 09:37:55+00:00): Thanks for your quick reply and further improving the map :-)
mavl (2024-11-13 06:00:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159076867, 159076813, 159076848 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
Hungerburg (2024-08-18 15:40:30+00:00): Hallo Original, du hast den Verbindungsbau bei der Zimmerwiese gelöscht. Was ist das https://www.austria-architects.com/de/ao-architekten-innsbruck/project/sportanlage-zimmerwiese wenn nicht ein Gebäude?
Peter Muret (2024-08-19 00:01:44+00:00): Auch bei einigen Gebäuden wurde das addr:suburb Attribut und das addr:country Attribut gelöscht. Ich habr sie nun wiederhergestellt.
Hungerburg (2024-08-19 19:03:07+00:00): @Peter - wenn die Hausumringe vorher auf Version eins standen, dann wurde nichts gelöscht, nur nicht angelegt ;)

Das Gebäude zwischen den Sportplätzen steht jedenfalls wieder. Ich glaub nicht dass das abgerissen worden ist seitdem ich zuletzt dort vorbeikam.

@Original - ein wenig aussagekräftigere Beschreibungen den Änderungen werden gern gesehen. Und ja, Willkommen bei Openstreetmap.
muralito (2024-08-18 16:56:15+00:00): Hola. No se que quisiste hacer pero borraste los nodos que representaban a la localidad y a la escuela, asi que lo revierto.
Cometin (2024-08-18 17:19:23+00:00): Disculpa metí la pata creí que estaba repetido
muralito (2024-08-18 20:07:31+00:00): No hay problema, todos podemos errarle. Los nodos con etiqueta "place" son los que representan ciudades, pueblos, parajes. En general son cosas que se mueven para ajustar la ubicacion o se actualizan datos, pero casi nunca se borran porque no son cosas que dejen de existir.
tyfi (2024-08-17 17:36:55+00:00): This changeset focused on a business route of Missouri Route 5 in Camdenton, Missouri.

This is a strange business route, as it's not acknowledged by MoDOT as one. It would appear local government designated it as such, and it functions just like one, so...
tyfi (2024-08-17 17:40:03+00:00): FYI the county is not the authority for state designations. Camden County can provide local names for stretches of state road, of course, but the county cannot dictate where MO 5 and its special routes go.

This is not one of those cases, though, since this MO 5 Business is not a state designation. Weird.
tux67 (2024-08-19 07:49:59+00:00): Hallo Jucke,

willkommen bei OSM. Zu diesem Change: Hausnummern werden bei OSM als Adresse nur einmal vergeben. Hier war die Hausnummer bereits gemappt. 
Deswegen wurde das Duplikat wieder entfernt.

Gruß
tux67