piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tomhukins (2025-11-27 11:37:30+00:00): Hi,

I've taken my time to reply because it's a complicated and controversial issue: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/post-towns-and-addr-city/137896/7

There's some use of addr:suburb in Saddleworth: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2gjt

And some use of addr:village: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2gju

I suspect it's one of those aspects of OSM where we have to live with the inconsistency.
HantDX (2025-10-17 16:52:54+00:00): Харьковская и Автозаводской Посёлок - так и называются эти микрорайоны?
HantDX (2025-10-17 16:53:21+00:00): Я просто нигде не натыкался и не слышал про эти названия...
phelyx79 (2025-10-21 18:37:57+00:00): Да, так и называются. Вот доказательства:
https://realt.onliner.by/2013/08/23/kharkiv
https://domovita.by/wiki/term/mikrorajon-harkovskaa-v-minske
https://belta.by/regions/view/reportazh-budni-avtozavodskogo-poselka-30-let-v-ozhidanii-snosa-340440-2019/
https://realt.onliner.by/2012/12/07/darriuss-33
pitfire (2025-10-18 04:30:38+00:00): Hallo leonlül,

wir löschen keine Gebäude, die noch sehr lange auf diversen Luftbildern zu sehen sind.
Der Lebenszyklus-Namensraum kann verwendet werden, um den Status eines Objektes mit einem Präfix wie proposed, planned, construction, disused, abandoned, demolished, historic u.a. zu kennzeichnen. 
Durch den Präfix kann sichergestellt werden, dass Objekte, die es noch nicht gibt oder die verfallen, geschlossen oder entfernt wurden, von Renderern und Anwendungen anders als existente Objekte behandelt werden. 

VG pitfire
stimoroll (2025-10-17 15:24:30+00:00): To revert (or fix). Some errors happens on filtering input args.
Hung Tran 9x0 (2025-10-25 06:31:24+00:00): tại sao bạn xoá tag oneway=yes trên đường thuỵ khuê? đường này cấm ô tô vào từ lạc long quân nên tag oneway này đúng, và có các tag oneway khác bổ sung  cho xe máy, xe đạp đó. Mong bạn đừng sửa đường lung tung nữa ạ.
empty_child (2025-10-18 11:50:05+00:00): Hello
We prefer Georgian locale in name tag (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8455434317). In this changeset it's the only one issue
evgenykatyshev (2025-10-18 13:54:07+00:00): Since I'm mapping Tbilisi, you will help a lot if you stop destroying other cities to save my time I spent for reporting you and reverting your changesets.
Tewuzij (2025-10-18 18:53:57+00:00): So as long as I'm not deleting stuff en masse without prior knowledge nor discussion, I should be fine?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173416392
MassCartog (2025-10-17 16:04:44+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. In this changeset you removed a node by mistake and damaged some nearby mapped polygons. I have fixed it. Try to be careful and review your edit before publishing. Thanks!
AlexSpritze (2025-10-24 10:23:22+00:00): Hi Erasmus, kannst du bitte mal prüfen, ob du versehentlich diesen Knoten verschoben hast: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3087470425/history#map=19/52.155918/11.412471&layers=N
SpinOff (2025-10-17 23:51:18+00:00): Nie ma takiej relacji jak type=hill. Usunąłem ją.

Szczyt wystarczy zaznaczyć punktem.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-23 04:17:03+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect names, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173654342
habi (2025-11-05 19:57:36+00:00): Ciao enristuda007
Hier hast du ein Stück der Aegertenstrasse gelöscht.
Ich habe das Changeset deshalb revoltiert.
habi (2025-11-05 19:57:46+00:00): revertiert, nicht revoltiert...
habi (2025-11-05 20:02:15+00:00): Revertierung in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174257397 und Löschung des Wegstückes dann in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174257545 "richtig" gemacht
user_5359 (2025-10-18 09:06:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why did you delete the key highway?
Please have aloso a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key%3Aname%3Aetymology.
eggie (2025-10-22 20:01:09+00:00): Hoi smveerman,

Ik heb de paden en de vorm van het water aangepast mbv de BGT omtrekgericht en Satalliet dataportaal.
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.49250,4.305418,17/?datastrip=20250815_SVNEO-02

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2025-10-17 15:56:55+00:00): Bonjour FREDERIC DURAND, bienvenue et merci pour votre contribution !

Pour faciliter la collaboration et aider les autres à comprendre vos modifications, il est préférable d'ajouter une brève description des changements que vous avez apportés. Des commentaires clairs aident la communauté à suivre votre travail et à fournir de meilleurs retours. Vous pouvez trouver des conseils pour rédiger de bons commentaires ici[1].

Sur la base de vos modifications de carte dans cet ensemble de changements, j'ai rédigé une suggestion pour ce à quoi pourrait ressembler un commentaire : "Ajout de routes résidentielles avec noms, limitations de vitesse et balises oneway"
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi FREDERIC DURAND, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added residential roads with names, speed limits, and oneway tags"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
mmis-isra (2025-12-08 18:12:02+00:00): Deine Änderung des Gebäude-Grundrisses Frankfurter Straße 112 ist fehlerhaft. Auf dem Luftbild sind noch Baugerüste zu sehen, die nicht Teil des Gebäudes sind. Der präzise Grundriss ist im Liegenschaftskataster (Layer "Hesse ALKIS") zu sehen. Bitte behebe deine Änderung.
Adam Dunn (2025-10-23 17:44:55+00:00): I see you've added layer=foot to the chairlift. This doesn't really make sense. What were you intending by this?
蕉饼电脑 (2025-10-18 04:10:37+00:00): "highway=trunk"对应“国道”及“快速路”；"highway=primary"对应“省道”及“主干路”。将"highway=trunk"对应白马北路这一绘制操作无法反映事实和现状。根据《福州市区“十三·五”市政公用基础设施建设规划（成果稿）》“2.1.1 道路建设现状分析”部分，白马路道路属“主干道”而非“快速路”。
LaurentPellegrino (2025-10-20 12:19:39+00:00): It seems this change invalidates the entire Russia polygon, preventing the boundary from being built depending on the method used. I’m not debating whether Crimea belongs to Ukraine, but rather the way this modification was implemented, removing that line doesn’t appear to be the right approach. 

Would be appreciated if someone with OSM experience could take a look.
MelancholicSlav (2025-10-20 16:55:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted. Please do not remove ways from relations as this makes them unusable.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173547427
MelancholicSlav (2025-10-20 16:57:57+00:00): Edit: specifically removing ways from closed polygons can break relations.
NeisBot (2025-10-17 16:51:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-18 10:50:02+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173444399
Taya_S (2025-10-20 08:34:24+00:00): Reverted https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/verzoek-changesets-terugdraaien/137023

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173524095
YjM (2026-03-13 23:18:53+00:00): Ahoj. Cením si Tvé snahy zmapovat všechny ploty ve městě. Osobně je také považuji za velice důležitý prvek mapy, protože dávají důležitou informaci o prostupnosti území. Chtěl bych Tě ale poprosit, abys nedělal zákres jen od stolu podle katastrálních map. V několika místech, která znám, jsem našel řadu nesrovnalostí (plot ve skutečnosti neexistuje / vede jinudy apod.). Na ortofoto snímcích od ČÚZK je to poznat. To se týká nejen této změny v Prapořištích, ale i ve Kdyni a v Brnířově. K zamyšlení pak je, zda vůbec dává smysl zakreslovat ploty mezi soukromými pozemky. Myslím si, že zakreslit ploty kolem celého bloku je úplně dostatečné, protože uvnitř zahrad stejně nelze ověřit průběh plotu "on-the-ground". Díky za Tvou práci.
Baloo Uriza (2025-10-17 18:14:49+00:00): Just a heads up, cameras shouldn't be part of road relations.
hatul (2025-10-28 10:37:32+00:00): שלום צור
בבקשה לא לתת שם כמו בור מים, סוג הנקודה ברור מהתיוג.
תודה
YomanNH (2025-10-21 15:38:33+00:00): Zostawiłeś fee=no :)
Bartek444 (2025-10-21 16:03:19+00:00): wiem, bo dodałem płatne w godzinach, a w pozostałych jest darmowe
fee:conditional =yes @ (Mo-Fr 07:00-19:00)
YomanNH (2025-10-21 16:14:53+00:00): A rzeczywiście, sorry, ślepy jestem :)
DeFra85 (2025-10-17 23:54:01+00:00): Mit den route=hiking scheint es wohl noch nicht ganz rund zu laufen. Schau mal hier, das ist ein gutes Tool: https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=319594&type=relation&map=16.0/52.2622/8.4661

Vor dem Bearbeiten musst du die Relation komplett laden und die neuen Wegestücke an die richtige Stelle packen.
Rumburak57 (2025-10-18 13:18:18+00:00): Hi, der neue Weg ist genau an der richtigen Stelle. Die Eigenschaften habe ich jetzt vom nachfolgendem Wegstück übernommen, da sich um den gleichen Wegtyp handelt. Bin gespannt, ob es jetzt passt.
DeFra85 (2025-10-18 22:19:21+00:00): Öffne mal den Link und klicke dort auf "Relation analysieren" und auf "Höhenprofil".
Da wirst du sehen, dass die einzelnen Wegstücke nicht in der richtigen Reihenfolge sind.ö
Rumburak57 (2025-10-19 17:41:03+00:00): Oha DeFra85, da muss ich morgen erstmal drüber nachdenken. Gefunden habe ich es. 😉
NeisBot (2025-10-17 17:30:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-18 10:49:21+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173440258
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2025-11-01 14:23:25+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن عشوائية أو شخصية للخريطة
elsy1 (2025-10-20 14:19:21+00:00): reverted vandal edit
PATRICK GEEA (2025-10-17 17:48:55+00:00): #msftgiving
elsy1 (2025-10-20 14:19:18+00:00): reverted vandal edit
Cafeshiin (2025-10-20 14:49:08+00:00): How can i add my cafe to the map then??
Cafeshiin (2025-10-20 14:49:15+00:00): How can i add my cafe to the map then??
elsy1 (2025-10-20 16:49:54+00:00): آموزش اضافه کردن یک کسب و کار بر روی نقشه OpenStreetMap

www.aparat.com/v/u155iwb
Comino (2025-10-17 18:44:26+00:00): Already on the map!

See: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13227299329
elsy1 (2025-10-20 14:19:12+00:00): reverted vandal edit
JP1986 (2025-10-17 18:21:57+00:00): https://maps.app.goo.gl/oUzWF6CygkghPjFg9
JP1986 (2025-10-17 18:22:17+00:00): https://www.google.com/maps/place/53+Fbg+de+la+Cueille+Mirebalaise/@46.5938404,0.3349893,3a,15.3y,230.58h,90.17t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sRNXNsoevT7AgRq0CjrsJ3g!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D-0.17156909319388092%26panoid%3DRNXNsoevT7AgRq0CjrsJ3g%26yaw%3D230.57592110812564!7i16384!8i8192!4m7!3m6!1s0x47fdbde19b5508f1:0xcb656b808b493786!4b1!8m2!3d46.594957!4d0.332283!16s%2Fg%2F11l6ljp2r1?authuser=0&entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MTAxNS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
JP1986 (2025-10-17 18:23:01+00:00): https://www.google.com/maps/@46.5974212,0.3270056,3a,20.4y,50.75h,87.4t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s0pfWboUxBuAEiEmKGMopug!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D2.603578475874528%26panoid%3D0pfWboUxBuAEiEmKGMopug%26yaw%3D50.75451961715702!7i16384!8i8192?authuser=0&entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MTAxNS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
JP1986 (2025-10-17 18:28:15+00:00): 2 pancartes indiquées en tout sur ces 2 liens indiquent bel et bien : "Faubourg de la Cueille-Mirebalaise.

Une seule différence se situe entre les 2 pancartes : le trait d'union ou tiret : "-"

Une 3ème existante indique "Rue du Faubourg de la Cueille Mirebalaise"

Hors, je crois que c'est une erreur de la ville puisqu'une autre rue est mal écrite : avenue Le Pelletier > avenue Lepeletier (écrit correctement) ;
en référence à Louis-Michel Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau.
JP1986 (2025-10-17 18:31:22+00:00): Et j'indique une 2ème preuve qui est la rue voisine "rue de la Cueille-Mirebalaise".

Quels cons, à part la Maire est ses adjoints ainsi que leurs précédents, iraient nommé "rue de la Cueille-Mirebalaise" à côté de la "rue du Faubourg de la Cueille-Mirebalaise" ?
JP1986 (2025-10-17 18:32:46+00:00): La question pourrait se poser en inversant les noms de rue.
Taya_S (2025-10-20 08:34:25+00:00): Reverted https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/verzoek-changesets-terugdraaien/137023

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173524095
蕉饼电脑 (2025-10-18 08:30:54+00:00): 应用于复合多边形关系而非路径的"natural=coastline"似乎并不得以渲染
Matt McCutchen (2025-10-17 18:58:01+00:00): Oops, forgot survey:date=2025-10-09
vojtechzaboril (2025-12-15 12:50:27+00:00): Hi, PR 9 between Caldeiro Verde and Caldeiro do Inferno is CLOSED. I changed access to no. See https://ifcn.madeira.gov.pt/pt/atividades-de-natureza/percursos-pedestres-recomendados/percursos-pedestres-recomendados.html
where is written, that PR 9 is OPEN but this section remains closed.
zurowi (2025-12-15 13:34:02+00:00): Hi, Yes, but Caldeiro Inferno can be reached via the Pico Ruivo Tunnel, so this route is NOT completely closed. I was in Caldeiro Inferno via the Pico Ruivo Tunnel on December 2, 2025.
So only the initial section from Caldeiro Verde is closed, not the entire route.
vojtechzaboril (2025-12-15 13:39:24+00:00): Hi, thanks for clarification. So the part is de-iure closed (according to the official information). But when you use the Pico Ruivo Tunnel, you will not see any signs etc., so practically it is opened (from this side). Am I correct?

The question is what we have to map? Is official information about closure enought to mark it as closed? How to map it in this case, when you can go from one side (no signs), but not from another.

Or is there (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174842408) any sign, which say that section to Cald. Verde is closed? So only part between this place (exit of the tunnel) and Cald. Verde is really closed?

Thanks.
zurowi (2025-12-15 14:25:32+00:00): After the Pico Ruivo tunnel (way/174842408), there is no sign indicating that the path to Caldeiro Verde is closed. 
I read on the Madeira Forum that rocks have fallen on the path about 200 meters after C.Verde in the direction of C.Inferno.

I find it very time-consuming to reclassify all sections on the OSM maps every time. Anyone who hikes in Madeira knows that trails can be temporarily closed. There is also a website where all temporary closures are noted. It would be ideal if the map information included a note that any closures should be checked on the official website https://ifcn.madeira.gov.pt/pt/. This would mean that the paths would be open and could be included in route planning.
https://www.madeiraislandnews.com/2025/02/caldeirao-verde-walking-trail-reopens-in-full.html

I'll be back in Madeira next Saturday.

Best regards
vojtechzaboril (2025-12-15 15:26:09+00:00): Thanks for the details, I changed tagging, so only part between the tunnel and C. Verde is marked as closed.

I think that the main problem is that the IFCN doen't even think, that tourists may use non marked routes. So they often mark (on https://ifcn.madeira.gov.pt/pt/) the whole route as closed. But in reality, only part of it is closed/is the reason of the closure and the rest is accessible.

BR.
NeisBot (2025-10-17 19:03:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-18 10:48:54+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173439965
MassCartog (2025-10-17 20:04:33+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, On OSM, we do not removed features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Even decommissioned trails that still exist should not be removed. Removing them is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
UnusualWorld (2025-10-19 19:14:04+00:00): Thank you for contributing to OSM!
Btw, here it's called "changeset", not "commit", this is not Github lol.
Langlaeufer (2025-10-20 09:26:06+00:00): Hi, von wo bis wo ist die Kantstraße genau Fahrradstraße ? Wie ist die Beschilderung?  Zusatzschild Anlieger frei oder Kfz frei?
Grüße
Langläufer
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:bicycle_road%3Dyes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173426088
Langlaeufer (2025-10-20 09:27:15+00:00): sorry, Karlstraße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173426088
jmsbert (2025-10-20 11:53:43+00:00): Hallo Lanlaeufer:
es ist die komplette straße von der morgensternstraße bis zur sedemünder straße. Die Karlstraße ist ausgewiesen als Fahrradstraße (blaues Schild) mit weißem Zusatzschild für Kraftwagen und Krafträdern (genau wie im Bild mit  Untertitel "In dieser Fahrradstraße ist auch motorisierter Verkehr zulässig" dargestellt: https://www.adac.de/rund-ums-fahrzeug/zweirad/fahrrad-ebike-pedelec/vorschriften-verhalten/fahrradstrassen/#so-wird-eine-fahrradstrasse-beschildert
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173426088
Langlaeufer (2025-10-20 14:32:02+00:00): Danke, ich habe es entprechend angepasst
Thundafox (2025-10-20 18:30:03+00:00): Ich kann morgen nochmal losgehen und nach den beschilderungen schauen , zumindest weis ich das auf der Sedemünderstraße an der Ecke Basbergstraße und an der Tunneldurchfahrt zum Friedhof auf der Fahrbahn das zeichen: traffic_sign=DE:244.1 auf die Fahrbahn gesprüt ist.
Langlaeufer (2025-10-20 19:14:29+00:00): Sedemünderstraße ist sicher, das haben wir auch auf foto in mapillary.com 

Karlstraße  muss recht neu sein ist aber nachvollziehbare Verlängerung. Ich hab mich nur gewundert, dass du thundafox das noch nichr eingetragen hattest, wo du dort aktiv warst. Ich denke aber jmsbert wird das schon richtig gesehen habe.
Thundafox (2025-10-20 19:38:03+00:00): es gab mal einen Vorschlag in 2018(https://rad-verkehrswende-hameln.de/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/radverkehr_hameln_2025_06.pdf) die Vorzugsroute 1, die sollte die Wege für Fahrräder von der Gertrudenstraße zur Karlstraße geändert werden, Ich muss schauen ob das letztens passiert ist, und jetzt auch Schilder stehen das andere konnte ich durch meine Fahrrad dash-cam nachvollziehen.
eggie (2025-10-17 20:03:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnodes.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Gino-52 (2026-02-22 12:05:26+00:00): Hallo Rübe27,
wieso hast Du die Abbiegespuren als service gemappt?
Das sind normale Abbiegespuren, die nichts mit, im Wiki beschrieben, service gemein haben.
Viele Grüße
Gino-52
Andreas Hernandez (2025-10-23 09:12:43+00:00): Hey izolight. Thanks for using our hashtag! Did you use our good first lines or not by the way?
aceman444 (2025-10-17 23:12:46+00:00): Zdravim, ked ste pridali maxspeed=70 na cestu, tak maxspeed:backward mozete odobrat, kedze uz nie je v opacnom smere specialna rychlost, ale je obojsmerne rovnaka.

A na zakreslenie budov si pomahajte obrysmi v katastri, nie len Ortofoto snimky, ktore tu mozu byt vselijake (a budovy zakryte stromami).

Dakujem
SoyJosueVerde (2025-10-18 22:21:53+00:00): Hola, Buenas Tardes Facalderonm, ¿Podrias decirles a los de OSM  que si podrian renderizar la etiqueta "busway"?, gracias.
Facalderonm (2025-10-18 22:40:45+00:00): Hola Josue. No es posible "decirles a los de los OSM" que hagan algo, ya que no hay un poder centralizado de la plataforma. Justamente, es mediante el aporte descentralizado de las personas que se ha hecho posible el mapa y todas sus características. Actualmente, el tema de renderización de "busway" se discute en los foros (https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/5127), así que eres totalmente invitado a aportar la discusión o, mejor, aportar a la solución. Saludos.
eggie (2025-10-18 07:57:49+00:00): Dag GoofyGecko,

Je wijzigingen zullen niets doen in OSM. De aard van het bedrijf zul je ook moeten toevoegen. Bv office=company

een website begint altijd met http...  bv https://www.onbeperktinbeweging.nl/
Kijk je nog even..
Je  edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=173428891
MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2025-10-18 08:18:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/12339197955 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
anshanin (2025-10-28 00:08:20+00:00): Hi. Are you sure your new restaurant is not a duplicate?
Location below is correct:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12309485965
taxi301 (2025-10-19 09:39:44+00:00): takie same pomieszczenia na różnych poziomach tagujemy level=-1;0;1;2;3;4...
albo jeżeli od 0 do 10 piętra level=0-10
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Proste_Tagowanie_Wn%C4%99trz#Zaawansowane_modelowanie_r%C3%B3%C5%BCnych_poziom%C3%B3w_(pi%C4%99ter)
Zwiadowca21 (2025-10-19 10:28:15+00:00): pomieszczenia na piętrach od 0 do 2 są takie same, ale numery już inne
taxi301 (2025-10-20 07:47:52+00:00): wtedy powielam obrys z inną nazwą i Level do każdego piętra inny
archie (2025-10-17 22:59:00+00:00): Hej, "shared_driveway" verkar vara odokumenterad och har tidigare inte använts här i Sverige. 
Vad är innebörden av "shared_driveway" och varför bör denna odokumenterade tagg  användas enligt din mening? Det kan även noteras att du har fört in denna tag även i Norge för 6 dagar sedan. Inte heller där har den tidigare använts. Du utför med andra ord missionsarbete vad avser denna tag utan - såvitt bekant - föregående diskussion.
ManuelB701 (2026-01-02 08:48:02+00:00): Beim Änderungssatz hast du auch einige Elemente gänzlich woanders verschoben (und u.a. die Box größer gemacht als es hätte sein sollen) z.B. einen Oberleitungmast mitten in den Rhein verschoben.
Kovoschiz (2025-10-18 09:20:56+00:00): Please don't delete it directly, as it may still be used in search & rescue. It should be changed to `abandoned:highway=`
bigmanbusman (2025-10-18 09:50:58+00:00): search and rescue did not use this path to rescue us
Kovoschiz (2025-10-19 12:42:38+00:00): Your one time alone doesn't mean it won't be used, considered, or rediscovered again. Referenced by them, ok? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can't_I_delete_this_trail%3F#What_should_I_do_instead?