piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2025-04-18 10:41:25+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
You've set https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1272898465/history to "building=closed".  If it's still a pub building but the pub is closed, more appropriate would be "building=pub" and "disused:amenity=pub".
Best Regards,
Andy
PS: Any other questions, please don't hesitate to ask!
ManuelB701 (2024-07-11 18:29:54+00:00): Kleiner Tipp, da du vor allem Einbahnstraßen mit Gegenrichtung Fahrrad frei bearbeitet hast: cycleway=opposite wurde gerade (d.h. vor ein paar Tagen) als veraltet eingestuft (da "oneway:bicycle=no" besser geeignet ist) und sollte gegenwärtig nicht mehr verwendet werden.
KartoGrapHiti (2024-07-11 20:23:03+00:00): Danke für die Info.
wordbird (2024-07-09 20:05:51+00:00): to revert this changeset as river outline was inadvertently deleted
IpswichEdits (2024-07-10 07:40:56+00:00): Just to add, these were from a survey in person. I have since created the respective buildings and attached the addresses to those buildings.
Carto'Cité (2024-09-16 08:25:01+00:00): Bonjour phy89,

Merci pour tes contributions sur les aménagements cyclables. J'ai remarqué quelques erreurs notamment des doublons sur les traversées cyclables qui existaient déjà. Par exemple cette traversée que tu as ajoutée https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1300268600 existait déjà : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1230839898
Ce sont des erreurs qui arrivent quand on débute sur la thématique des aménagements cyclables. Si tu veux un bon outil pour contribuer sur cette thématique je te conseille vivement JOSM et le rendu des aménagements cyclables https://gitlab.com/cartocite/MapCSS-JOSM-Bicycle
L'apprentissage de JOSM peut sembler laborieux mais crois-moi ensuite la contrubtion va réellement 10x plus vite.
N'hésite pas si tu as des questions ou des remarques.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Carto'Cité (2024-09-16 08:57:07+00:00): Re-bonjour,
J'en profite également pour corriger la voie verte. Tu l'as décrite en piste cyclable mais j'ai regardé et il s'agit d'une voie verte que j'ai corrigée, je te laisse regarder les tags : 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1300268595
bicycle=designated
foot=designated
highway=path
segregated=no
surface=asphalt
traffic_sign=FR:C115
(cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Voies_vertes)
Tu as également ajouté une piste en doublon avec ce chemin qui est considéré comme une piste. Si tu ne les vois pas comme des pistes je te conseille également de regarder sur le rendu CyclOSM qui te révélera bien les aménagements existants : https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/48.76167/1.92396&layers=Y

À ta disposition pour en discuter.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Frans S (2024-08-01 08:08:42+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
Please get yourself familiar with tagging of highways in India. You tagged these roads as service roads. Unclassfied or residential are better choices.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India/Tags/Highway

And. solve the issues shown by the Issue triangle before you upload your mappings.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153749336
Frans S (2024-07-20 11:57:24+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
However, you hardly squared your mapped buildings.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153749401
tastrax (2024-07-10 05:49:10+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
limes11 (2024-07-09 16:01:42+00:00): Hi

auf footway's ist bicycle=no default. Ein vernünftiger Router braucht das nicht.

VG
computerfarmer (2024-07-09 18:54:41+00:00): Hallo,

Dann frag mal OsmAnd. Die haben da durch geroutet.

Viele Grüße
limes11 (2024-07-10 07:58:02+00:00): Das werden sie dann aber auch mit einem bicycle=no.

Die Einstellungen in OsmAnd sind wohl so gewählt, dass footways lediglich mit einem penalty bewertet aber nicht ausgeschlossen werden. Was durchaus sinnvoll ist, wenn ein Umweg mehr Zeit kostet, als das Rad zu schieben. 

VG
MarcoR (2024-07-10 08:09:07+00:00): Il nome "Via Campoderbina" è scritto da qualche parte? In alternativa, è usato da qualche abitante locale?

Buon mapping,
Marco.
AnonimoA (2024-07-10 09:10:42+00:00): Si, dai locali è così conosciuta, ma se serve lo inserisco in descrizione…
MarcoR (2024-07-10 11:58:54+00:00): Grazie per la risposta.

Io il nome locale lo metterei in "loc_name" e lascerei in "name" quello che è indicato dai cartelli stradali.

Vedi la wiki per maggiori info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:name
ElliottPlack (2024-07-09 16:24:20+00:00): This changeset deleted a number of parks without explanation. Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16430 and comment as to the reason for these deletions.
user_21725834 (2024-07-09 18:50:07+00:00): Hello Elliot!

Thank you for welcoming me with a block. OSM links Notes directly on your OSM profiles without my consent so I think that is violation of my privacy. So I will make new account to keep OSM from doxxing me.

Great way to support the OSM community

Can you unblock me now since I have over 7k change sets already
dieterdreist (2024-07-22 23:03:44+00:00): Ciao Mau, ti volevo segnalare che crossing=zebra si usa solo quando non esiste un semaforo per pedoni, altrimenti il tag è crossing=traffic_signals.

Saluti
Martin
mau59 (2024-07-23 08:14:48+00:00): Ciao Martin, grazie per la segnalazione.  In genere quando c'è un semaforo non uso mai il tag delle strisce pedonali: deve essermi sfuggito. Comunque mi sono sempre chiesto: in presenza di un semaforo le strisce ci sono sempre, ma possono essere di tipo diverso (zebra classica, doppia striscia) per cui forse varrebbe la pena di mappare anche questo, no?

Un saluto,
Maurizio
ivanbranco (2024-07-23 12:41:48+00:00): Il tipo di strisce si può mappare con https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:markings
mau59 (2024-07-23 18:08:49+00:00): Ti ringrazio. Confesso che non mi è mai stato chiarissimo come taggare gli attraversamenti: ad esempio su JOSM le zebre si possono taggare come crossing:zebra, crossing_ref:zebra, crossingmarkings:zebra... In genere uso la tendina nella sezione Campi più che la sezione Etichette, anche per la molteplicità di queste ultime.
Mb_651 (2024-07-10 13:42:23+00:00): Versorgt?
Mezonens (2024-07-14 17:58:39+00:00): Hi!
I surveyed the situation in nature and made some changes to the geometry and attributes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153941266
Cucazer (2024-07-16 15:20:44+00:00): Thanks!
So you mean that some of the cutlines are not usable as track/path? I guess, it's not confidently identifiable just from the aerial imagery.
Mezonens (2024-07-16 19:53:23+00:00): Hmm... well, cutlines are essentially drivable if you have a good off-road vehicle, like a Lada Niva. And sometimes they are also used as tracks, but in forestry, these strips are created to separate forest blocks. However, cutline=firebreak is plowed every year to limit the spread of fire through the undergrowth, and they are not intended for movement. I think it's correct to show them as cutline=firebreak even if they are sometimes used as tracks.

It's possible that cutline=border could be indicated together with highway=track (if feasible) in cases where they are also used for transport.
HellMap (2024-07-17 08:54:31+00:00): Cutlines that are usable as tracks should indeed have both  `man_made=cutline` and `highway=track` (or have two lines for one each). Usually it would be grade 5 tracks with very low smoothness. There's a fairly low "standard" for what is considered a track. Something where only a forestry tractor can pass is still technically a track.
Mezonens (2024-07-17 13:33:13+00:00): Thank you for the explanation. 
From now on, for man_made=cutline ways, if I see that they are used for transportation purposes, I will also apply highway=track.
richlv (2024-07-28 13:45:34+00:00): Yep, it was intended that =cutline marks actual cutlines only, and any navigable features are tagged on top of it as needed.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcutline

As the inventor of that tag, thank you so much for using and improving it :)
Xvtn (2024-07-09 21:10:07+00:00): Good catch!
ElliottPlack (2024-07-09 16:39:33+00:00): Welcome, thanks for adding this school!
Dāvis Kļaviņš (2024-07-12 06:06:04+00:00): They don't sell even a single vegetable/fruit, impossible to be shop=greengrocer.
richlv (2024-07-13 21:26:54+00:00): What should it be?
mrmaxguns (2024-07-14 06:19:56+00:00): Meats, cheeses, mostly. I misinterpreted what "produce stand" meant on Street complete. Don't see it as primarily a cafe. Maybe butcher?
richlv (2024-07-14 07:18:03+00:00): If this is similar to other Enhars, it might be a bit difficult to classify in OSM. They sit somwhere between convenience, deli, butcher...
The one in Jugla has been approximated to convenience with a separate cafe node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11670118102 .
Would that be acceptable here as well (for example, do they sell some drinks, maybe pastry etc)?
Dāvis Kļaviņš (2024-07-14 07:37:43+00:00): Yes, with Enhars it's a bit complicated as they differ from each other also. This one has a butcher, pastry, ability to order a coffee and a table with a pairs of chairs, if I remember correctly.
Dāvis Kļaviņš (2024-07-30 20:03:49+00:00): Corrected to more suitable tags: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154621988
dcapillae (2024-07-09 18:14:33+00:00): They are just finishing the asphalting. The tunnel has changed direction several times in the last few weeks due to the installation of anti-noise screens, but it will be back to its usual two-way very soon.
Frederik (2024-07-15 00:10:14+00:00): Thanks for the follow-up!
YomanNH (2024-07-09 17:44:18+00:00): Dzięki za rozwiązanie moich uwag! :)
Frans S (2024-09-10 07:38:54+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.
H: Included a yard of clearing.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153752208
ElliottPlack (2024-07-09 16:53:10+00:00): thanks for the corrections while working on the import!
cadastre_tiana (2024-07-09 16:58:12+00:00): You are very welcome!
KAE2024 (2024-07-09 16:55:35+00:00): Extension of Technology Way to connect with Wood Hall Drive completed summer 2024
ssundell (2024-08-09 22:59:31+00:00): Moi! Hupakankorven luonnonsuojelualueella ei saa ajaa kuin parilla hassulla reitillä, mm. tämä polku ei kuulu niihin: https://www.tampere.fi/luonto-ja-ymparisto/luonnonsuojelu/luonnonsuojelualueet-ja-suojelukohteet/hupakankorven-luonnonsuojelualue
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153752886
tila89 (2024-08-10 05:19:40+00:00): Niinpä näkyy olevan. Jostain joskus ymmärsin että pitkoksilla saisi ajaa, kun ei se luontoa kuluta..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153752886
ssundell (2024-08-10 06:37:23+00:00): Joo, tämä on vähän hassu, kun tosiaan tuossa päätöstekstissäkin mainitaan, että pyöräily on sallittu parilla sorastetulla / pitkospuitetulla polulla. Luonnonsuojelualuekin on aika uusi, joten ehkä tuo on tehty tarkoituksella.  Tai ehkä ei, mutta korjaaminen edellyttäisi suojelupäätöksen muuttamista, ja veikkaan, että sitä ei ole tehty.
Jordi MF (2024-07-09 17:38:42+00:00): Hola Camins de l'Orde de Montesa. Què volies mapejar en esta zona, una dutxa o l'àrea per a les autocaravanes? Pel que veig, has afegit una dutxa, però l'has anomenada "Àrea autocaravanas libre".
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-07-09 17:38:22+00:00): Based on a description from the RSPB, foot=permissive and everything else private seems the most appropriate.
There is very limited horse permit access, but it's limited enough so that "private" applies there too.
I've also taken the liberty of updating the "accessible" track following the RSPB's email.

To discuss these changes, please email data@openstreetmap.org with a subject line of "[Ticket#2024070810000311] Cycling at RSPB Broadwater Warren Nature Reserve"
BCNorwich (2024-07-11 06:30:05+00:00): Hi, Please note and if possible correct the warnings given above. I've removed 1 duplicated section of highway that disrupted routing.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2024-07-11 06:33:16+00:00): Now make that 2 duplicated section of highway removed.
Frans S (2024-07-20 14:14:51+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please solve the issues before you upload your mappings.
Don't use the tag 'footway'in rural areas. Check the highway wiki where to use it. These traces should be tagged as path.
Best regards
Marek-M (2024-07-09 18:53:20+00:00): Dzięki za pamięć i poprawki :) Pozdrawiam :)
MarinoBM (2024-07-09 22:33:20+00:00): Hola Benji76: gracias por colaborar en mejorar el mapa de OpenStreetMap.
Has cambiado el nombre a los campos deportivos por el de los clubes que los gestionan. No es correcto.
Repongo los nombres.
Si tienes dudas puedes plantearlas en OSM telegram
https://t.me/osmcyl
Un saludo.
vasony (2024-07-10 04:09:47+00:00): Szia!

Rózsa utca 10, 12, 14 pl.
Így duplikáltak a házszámok.
Vagy az épületen vagy a bejáraton legyen házszám, de így biztos nem jó. Az egyik bejáratot nem jelölted csak házszám pöttyel.

Jelen esetben javaslom az épületen meghagyni, a 2 bejáratot meg csak entrance=main/staircase/yes igény szerint, cím nélkül.

Tamás
balint36 (2024-07-10 09:07:03+00:00): Oké, de csak 5 után tudom megcsinálni.
Melyiknél látod, hogy csak házszám pötty van bejárat nélkül?
vasony (2024-07-10 19:50:07+00:00): Bocs, nem csak pötty volt, hanem entrance=secondary, ezt rosszul írtam, mert a josm nem mutatta az ikont.
Ezt én még nem használtam soha, 
máshol a paneloknál entrance=yes vagy staircase van ezeket a másodlagos bejáratokon.
wiki azt írja hogy 
"An additional entry, often used only for events or at special times."
mintha ez nem teljesen ez lenne, de el tudom engedni.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-10-23 02:32:44+00:00): Hello 127logs, just a curios.
I see, if we want to prohibit no_u_turn for truck.
In the official OSM wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

There is restriction:hgv but in most routing engine like OSRM, Valhalla they don't understand the restriction:hgv 
https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Avalhalla%2Fvalhalla%20restriction&type=code

Therefore i suggest a new kind of tagging. We should mark like:
restriction=no_u_turn
except=bicycle;motorcycle;motorcar;bus
Then only when user choose their prefered vehicle=truck, they will being directed to another link.
(Inactive) Buddy-the-Elf (2024-10-28 20:08:30+00:00): Hello there!

Thank you for informing us on that preferred method of tagging for those restrictions. We will certainly keep that information in mind if we tag any more of those in the future. 

Have a great day and happy mapping!
woodpeck (2024-07-09 19:00:05+00:00): Dear Rohitashav Aggarwal, please consider using changeset comments that are understandable by other humans participating in the project. "#hotosm-project-16842 #CanCross #CRC #MissingMaps" doesn't say anything about your intentions with this upload; "added buildings in High River, Alberta" would have been much more useful!
b-holdet (2024-07-09 18:29:26+00:00): Hvorfor giver du cykelstierne navne, når de ikke har det?

Eks: Bregnerød Byvej
b-holdet (2024-07-11 19:09:24+00:00): Denne her svarede du heller ikke på for 3 år siden, og det er samme årsag til at jeg også spørger nu:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101935071
GanderPL (2024-07-09 19:33:41+00:00): Robię zdjęcia parkingów po to, aby oznaczyć wszystko. W tym maxheight, maxspeed, jak i foot czy LPG.
kwiatek_123 (2024-07-09 19:55:03+00:00): a ok, nawet na to nie spojrzałem, poprawię
rene78 (2024-07-13 10:57:37+00:00): I think what you mean is "charge:conditional" instead of "fee:conditional"?
Meinew (2024-07-13 14:49:46+00:00): You are right, thanks a lot ! I changed it (and fee=yes into charge=yes too)
miluethi (2024-07-10 17:04:48+00:00): Rebecca,

I noticed your building shapes are far bigger (2x - 10) than the aerial imagery. Please narrow down your building shapes.
Ideally, please square out all shapes by pressing the "Q" key.

Thank you.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-09 19:00:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/906564226

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mcliquid (2024-07-10 07:45:09+00:00): Jetzt steht der Wegweiser mitten im Wald: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10270934898

Welchen Hochleistungs-GNSS-Empfänger verwendest du und mit welcher Genauigkeit wurde hier aufgezeichnet? Die Wege unterscheiden sich nun sehr stark von den Daten des Landes.
Luzandro (2024-07-10 12:08:46+00:00): soweit ich das sehe, war der Weg auch schon davor nicht in der Nähe von diesem Wegweiser und auch die Strava Heatmap zeigt keine Aktivitäten direkt dort, oder wo auf der Basemap die Wege verzeichnet sind, an
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-09 19:00:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159647004

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
emersonveenstra (2024-07-10 20:26:07+00:00): Hi, you created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1300312462 with no tags, please go back and tag it, thanks!
SomeoneElse (2024-08-26 14:01:34+00:00): Hello,
You've added 3 services to the Army reserve centre https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679618951/history - is that actually correct, or is it just the army?
Best Regards,
Andy
OrangeHurst97 (2024-08-26 14:56:23+00:00): Hi Andy,
When I surveyed this, I noted that there was signage for all three of the armed forces as tagged.
I don't have any photos retained, but Bing Streetside (and Google Streetview) shows signs for the air force and army at the enterance. (maybe the navy was a temporary sign?)
My understanding that this was the most appropriate tagging, unless there is a single tag that covers multiple elements of the MoD?
Either way, I haven't been able to confirm online that the navy is present, so I'll ether need to remove that after your response, or take a look next time I'm passing (which may be a while).
SomeoneElse (2024-08-26 15:14:07+00:00): Great - thanks for checking!
silversurfer83 (2024-07-09 19:43:56+00:00): Gnarf. Kommentar vergessen.

Hemfurth Edersee: Landuse, Adressen, Gebäude nach Luftbild und Kataster
Protoxenus (2026-02-25 11:51:04+00:00): Hi,
mal abgesehen davon, dass die Läden immer noch existieren, auch wenn sie anders genutzt werden oder leer stehen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik
Gruß Protoxenus
Langlaeufer (2024-09-04 16:05:22+00:00): Das bleibt laut Schild ein Gemeineinsamer Rad- und Fußweg. Dieser wird als Mehrzweckweg (path) erfasst und nicht als Fußweg (footway). Das es wie ein Bürgersteig aussieht kannst du trotzdem mit footway=sidewalk erfassen. Ich hab es wieder zurückgeändert
Langlaeufer (2024-09-04 16:11:15+00:00): Zur Hilfe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren
InsertUser (2024-07-10 16:05:43+00:00): Is it open then?
JasonBob (2024-07-10 16:18:24+00:00): Yes it looks to have opened in the last week:
https://www.buzzfeed.com/audreyworboys/disney-lookout-cay-lighthouse-point-review
wordbird (2024-07-09 20:55:41+00:00): This changeset is reverting the problematic edit from changeset #153748700
xeen (2024-07-14 13:08:11+00:00): Magst Du noch Fußwege ergänzen, damit das Routing auch für die weiterhin funktioniert? Der Diagonaltrenner ist ja nur für (bzw. gegen?) Autos.
Wulf4096 (2024-07-21 04:04:54+00:00): Done.
xeen (2024-07-21 05:37:35+00:00): ♥
NieWnen (2024-07-10 17:14:46+00:00): Cześć, ścieżka była już oznaczona. Przywróciłem poprzednie tagowanie.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-09 21:10:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12044617161

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-09 21:40:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12044679096

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
citrula (2024-07-10 00:42:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM - Google Maps is not an acceptable source for edits. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153761532
skquinn (2025-03-31 10:51:00+00:00): Hi,

Please do not tag shop=yes on every building that does not have an identifying business tag. These are usually redundant, always useless, and trigger a bunch of JOSM validator warnings that have to be cleaned up by other mappers.
skquinn (2024-08-10 04:29:16+00:00): Hi,

Regarding Jack in the Box at 3402 Mangum Road: this had been added on the building outline and marked as disused from my survey. (I work near this area and come through here frequently for other reasons.) This is NOT a currently active Jack in the Box location (they are terrible about keeping their list of locations current). Please be more mindful of possible duplicates in the future.