piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frank Peng (2025-12-05 03:23:20+00:00): Also, don't remove tags you don't understand. Just because you come across elements with tags you don't understand or have no meaning to you doesn't automatically mean you should remove them. They may have been added for a specific purpose. If you think they might be junk, then try to contact the author first. You can also contact me if you have any questions or concerns about my map edits. My map edits are usually adding valid map data and modifying existing map data to reflect changes in the real world while preserving the history on OSM (e.g. not deleting existing map elements and redrawing them). https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_tags_that_you_don't_understand

Don't remove objects that you don't need or don't like. Be brave in what you add, but careful in what you delete. You should certainly not remove map details that someone else added. It is known that not everything is always needed by everyone, but you should not remove something just because you do not need it, you think it is stupid, or the validator ordered it so. Per the OSM Wiki, it states:

>"Be brave in what you add but careful in what you delete. Someone added a catenary mast or a manhole? And you think it's stupid or unnecessary because it doesn't display on the map? Inaccurate mapping is not forbidden, but you certainly should not work the other way and remove details that someone else added. It is known that not everything is always needed by everyone, but you should not remove something just because you do not need it / you think it is stupid / the validator ordered it so."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_objects_that_you_don't_need_or_like
Frank Peng (2025-12-06 23:45:47+00:00): When someone comments on any of your changesets, you should almost always respond, even if that answer might be "I don't know" - or if you fixed the mistakes yourself, as it helps prevent further issues on OSM and builds trust with other mappers. Edits of people who never respond may be treated as less trustworthy. Per the OSM Wiki, it states:

>"You should almost always respond, even if that response might be "I don't know" – or if you fixed the mistakes yourself. Public communication between mappers is crucial to building trust. Edits of people who never respond may be treated as less trustworthy."

Please keep in mind that you will not be banned just for making mistakes. We understand it takes time to learn how OpenStreetMap works. However, unresponsive users who continue questionable edits despite being contacted multiple times first will get a warning (so-called 0-day block), then progressively longer blocks on their account.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Changeset_Discussions
user_5359 (2025-12-12 10:07:40+00:00): Hello! You add the tag ref:lidl_cz. Wouldn't ref:CZ:lidl be the correct notation?
Vojtěch Fošnár (2025-12-14 09:46:31+00:00): Hi, this was simply for testing purposes, I took the ref part from the AllThePlaces database. I do not plan on doing an import in the near future, as matkoniecz is working on it instead, but if I do I'll consider it. Thanks for pointing this out tho
Mashin (2025-11-22 19:03:38+00:00): Hi,
there are no signs of any road on the street level imagery, just a regular lawn. It's better not to add the driveway, but you can mark that the sidewalk does not have a curb.
thompsondt (2025-11-22 21:01:25+00:00): I'm torn. It is more visible from aerial photos and the break in the curb matches both the aerials and the historical images.  https://www.loc.gov/pictures/resource/hhh.ct0332.photos.023145p/ That said, I don't usually map historic places. I had hoped to get out there to do fresh street-level images of the entire site.
Mashin (2025-11-22 22:10:36+00:00): That seems to be just grass growing differently due to different condition of nutrients.
For historical data we have https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ though.
thompsondt (2025-11-23 00:01:33+00:00): Looking through changes in the site from recent years, it is possible that the area is deliberately being seeded. I have visited this location several times, although not in the past two years. If it is the case that the driveway deliberately being changed rather than just being untrodden gravel, then it does make sense to call it a lawn; however, this would not be consistent with what I've directly observed.
eggie (2025-11-22 18:11:40+00:00): Dag Peet,

Lijkt mij oke zo..
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:piste:type

Mapse,
eggie
Tatfahren (2025-11-22 17:34:40+00:00): Quelle ist falsch
vasony (2025-11-23 06:24:07+00:00): Szia!

Egy helyi szerkesztő mindig törli a nevet, hogy ez magánút és nem ez a neve, van bővebb információd erről? 
A módosításodat nem ezért vontam vissza, hanem Bing-re igazítottad az utcát, ami el van csúszva. Utca igazítás előtt a Binget "igazítani szükséges, pl. a FÖMI 2015-höz.

https://www.osmtippek.hu/kezdok-kezikonyve/id-editor-hasznalata/
"A kép pozíciójának kalibráláshoz a nyisd le a rétegek listája alatt a Légifelvétel elcsúszásának korrigálása szekciót és itt vagy a nyíl ikonokkal, vagy az egér bal gombját lenyomva a téglalapon helyre igazíthatod a műholdképet. "

Tamás
Ádámka (2025-11-23 08:37:16+00:00): Szia! Köszi a segítséget! Az utca elejére kiraktak egy (nem hivatalos) 'MAGÁNTERÜLET' táblát, de attól az még közterület marad. Ma megpróbálok kimenni és megnézni!

Ádám
vasony (2025-11-23 09:35:16+00:00): Szia!

Telekkönyvileg az utca eleje nem is utca, hanem a telek része. Ha bemész nézd meg légy szíves, hogy hátul jobb oldalt megvan-e még a Turistaház utca tábla.

Köszi, Tamás
literan (2025-11-23 10:26:08+00:00): а тег офиса?)
Dodko (2025-12-05 09:48:51+00:00): Adrese chýba vyplnené addr:place môže byť 
Skala
Skalská Nová Ves
Újazd
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-23 00:15:32+00:00): DWG revert - spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175009334
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-22 23:48:24+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM! Thanks for your enthusiasm, but we have to ask a question regarding your sources. You say you've used a UNICEF map. Are you please able to give a link to that map, or tell us what Licence it's released under? TBMK, most UN data is © them & can't be used for OSM mapping without a waiver. Thanks!
Graeme Fitzpatrick         						
Moderator     		
OSMF Data Working Group
AEJubeily (2025-11-23 00:19:22+00:00): Hello, here is a link to the PDF where i found the map:
https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2020/11/un-habitat-unicef_old_saida_neighbourhood_profile.pdf
And before i also used a map from VisitSaida:
https://visitsaida.com/saida-map/
To be clear, the maps are used as references to visualize how these clusters are supposed to look like as on satellite it is very chaotic. However when mapping it, i am using satellite imagery.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-23 02:48:37+00:00): Thanks! As I suspected, both of those sites are copyrighted, so can't be used for OSM mapping. Any details e.g. names or types of features that you've added from them will unfortunately have to be reverted. Really, about the only thing that you can add purely from aerial imagery is building=yes
AEJubeily (2025-11-23 15:57:04+00:00): Just to be sure, am i allowed to use them just to get a general idea and add clusters without the in depth detail these maps show?
Like for example, the clusters i add are from aerial imagery and the maps are just for where they are supposed to be
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-24 00:58:12+00:00): Really, unless you know for absolute certainty that their licence is OK for us to use, it's safest to never copy off any other map, & only map by available imagery, or direct, on-the-ground, observation.
arjunaraoc (2025-11-26 07:04:34+00:00): Hello Harshavardhan2000A,   Your mapping is introducing errors. For example for the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1452929446  You seem to have approximately located the road joining  16.5453312, 81.7035984 and  16.5453192, 81.7053123, as it can not be identified clearly from the satellite imagery Bing, ESRI etc. I suggest you stick to mapping the areas you are familiar with. If you are mapping from satellite images, just focus on ponds, waterways and  national highways, which can be clearly identified  from satellite maps. If you introduce too many errors in mapping, your work will not be useful and will need to be deleted.   Please fix the errors highlighted in the discussions and  only focus on areas familiar to you or features clearly discernible from satellite images.
vasony (2025-11-23 06:19:01+00:00): Szia! 

A táblán külön van írva, a módosításodat visszavontam.

Tamás
Nakaner-repair (2025-11-30 21:25:04+00:00): This changes was reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175331960
cronoser (2026-03-12 16:28:11+00:00): corregidas etiquetas
rivermont (2025-12-02 02:21:44+00:00): why?
lapsly (2025-12-02 14:33:12+00:00): This node was not in this location, pointed in this direction. Editing is not currently functional on the Deflock app. Node was deleted and replaced.
infeeeee (2025-11-24 14:39:24+00:00): Módosításcsomag visszavonva: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175069951
gscholz (2025-11-25 07:02:00+00:00): Hi molly7932x,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=36.86849&lat=-1.14127&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175000940

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Sylabowy Kot (2025-11-23 07:06:46+00:00): Nie tyle same landuse, co po prostu mapowanie otoczenia szkoły.
michal_f (2025-11-23 11:52:10+00:00): Racja...
literan (2025-11-23 10:24:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12856400105 между инициалами вообще-то положены пробелы (в идеале неразрывные, и еще лучше если тонка шпация)
Daniil Musatov (2025-12-22 19:59:25+00:00): Ладно, убедили - буду ставить пробелы (уже начал).
JMGonk (2025-11-22 19:04:26+00:00): Note: I'm relying on machine translation but I'm almost certain the name: tag is incorrect.  I have found photos of the facility and the English name is prominently displayed on it, but there is no obvious Arabic name I have seen.
Ronaldo Bowen (2025-11-22 19:26:41+00:00): Hi, I accidentally uploaded these edits as part of my university project. They do not reflect real-world conditions. Could someone please revert this changeset? Thank you and apologies
VA00 (2025-11-26 06:04:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13324809151

To jest druga kamera, czy duplikat już istniejącej w tym samym miejscu?
Anas masuris (2025-11-26 12:29:56+00:00): Duplikaty, nie pobrałem z okienka kamer
joost schouppe (2025-11-24 14:56:52+00:00): Hoi Bart,
Wat heb je hier willen doen? Mag dit punt weg?
BartHanssens (2025-11-26 13:32:35+00:00): Hmz, lastig.

Het staat nu leeg maar het is niet zeker of er iets nieuws komt (het is al vele jaren de leeronderneming / winkel / café... van het H-Hart & College, elk jaar een ander thema op dezelfde locatie: https://archive.is/ntV94)
habi (2025-11-24 08:05:18+00:00): Ciao drittel-matzos
Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Du hast hier auf dem Gebäude-Umriss die Addressdaten von https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3230107411 dupliziert.
Die Adressdaten auf dem Eingang des Gebäudes (sehr wahrscheinlich) machen das allfällige Routing hier hin präziser, wenn die Daten auf dem Gebäude-Umriss dupliziert sind, ist das wenig sinnvoll.
Die Details des Gebäudes wie Stockwerkanzahl sind jedoch gut so erfasst.
Willst du das noch ändern?
Grüsse aus Bern,
habi

PS: Bei irgendwelchen Fragen gerne hier in den Kommentaren nachhaken oder bei https://c.osm.org/c/107 eine Diskussion eröffnen, wir versuchen gerne zu helfen.
drittel-matzos (2025-11-25 20:52:57+00:00): hallo Habi, mir war gar nicht bewusst dass ich den Umriss des Gebäudes dupliziert habe. Ich habe versucht, den zu finden, bin aber daran gescheitert.
habi (2025-11-25 21:41:21+00:00): Du hast nicht den Gebäudeumriss dupliziert, nur die Addressdaten, die seit 5 Jahren bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3230107411/history/ sind auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316830017/history/ verdoppelt. :)
drittel-matzos (2025-11-25 21:00:04+00:00): Falls jemand erfassen mag: der öffentliche Bus darf da immer links abbiegen, und von 20 - bis 5 Uhr auch alle andere. Auch Fussgänger können da immer durch
drittel-matzos (2025-11-25 21:01:22+00:00): gerade gecheckt: für Fussgänger plant der Routenplaner korrekt
eggie (2025-11-22 20:11:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Lijkt me oke zo. 'k Heb wat eilandjes toegevoegd.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-11-23 09:06:49+00:00): Er staan nog wel twee bankjes in het water nu.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-11-23 16:26:04+00:00): bankjes verwijderd
mustmiekieke (2025-11-24 10:05:17+00:00): Hey wat vreemd, ik dacht dat ik ze had verwijderd maar ik heb het kennelijk niet opgeslagen. Bedankt voor 't bijwerken eggie :)
eggie (2025-11-24 11:07:05+00:00): De server was gisteren overbelast.
Mapse
NeisBot (2025-11-23 07:14:21+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/600768315 v2 | crossings=9

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175003248
NeisBot (2025-11-23 07:14:22+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 25 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/165257080 v7 | crossings=4
https://osm.org/way/165257081 v8 | crossings=3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175003605
hobbesvsboyle (2025-12-06 15:46:43+00:00): Thanks for updating W Wash to reflect the recent changes. I noticed that you tagged the split sections as `highway=tertiary_link`. I changed it back to tertiary. Link is only when the road connections to a lower classified road.
user_5359 (2025-11-23 08:37:13+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/19871913. What is the mean of the tags 
GIS_Acres = 525
PA:DIVISION = COUNTY & LOCAL PARKS
mapmyplanet (2025-11-23 21:08:18+00:00): GIS_Acres came from the PADUS4_1_StatePA.gdb dataset - total acreage

PA:DIVISION=COUNTY & LOCAL PARKS was in the tags for previous outline of the park - didn't want to lose it if it has purpose in a local convention.
maro21 (2025-11-23 12:00:21+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap.
Komentarze opisu zmian służą do podawania, co się zmieniło na mapie. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
evgenykatyshev (2025-11-23 08:57:05+00:00): Please don't use Bing imagery for clarifying geometry of any object. This imagery is very inaccurate in Georgia
NeisBot (2025-11-23 07:14:24+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 30 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/1304741707 v2 | crossings=7
https://osm.org/way/1288123142 v2 | crossings=3
https://osm.org/way/1288123141 v2 | crossings=3

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/11945677294 v2
https://osm.org/node/10905661907 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175004237
Piagno (2025-12-24 10:19:53+00:00): Wieso wurden die Kühlhausstrasse 4 und 4a wieder hinzugefügt?
Ich habe absichtlich das Gebäude als demolished markiert innerhalb des Baustellengebiets, dass das eben nicht passiert.
Habe die neuen Elemente von diesem Changeset wieder gelöscht.
biobuur (2025-12-24 14:32:54+00:00): Hoi Piagno
ich bin daran, im Oberaargau neue Gebäude einzuzeichnen. Hier habe ich wohl die kantonalen Daten falsch interpretiert. Es ist häufig nicht ganz klar, welche Gebäude schon stehen, und ich habe diese Baustelle nicht aktuell vor Augen. 
Ich sehe, dass du weitherum Änderungen machst und Korrekturen anbringst. Wie machst du das? Wie filterst du  die Daten raus?
ä liebe gruess
Pöilu
Piagno (2025-12-24 15:33:46+00:00): Unterschiedlich, in diesem Beispiel habe ich aufgrund der Notiz bei Mappern vom Bahnhof Langenthal nachgefragt.
Gestern hatte ich den neuen Bahnhof Zell vor Ort angeschaut und beim Umsteigen in Langenthal, ist mir das aufgefallen, dass die Gebäude in OSM wieder da sind.
Piagno (2025-12-24 15:34:50+00:00): Kühlhaus 6-8 scheinen ebenfalls abgerissen zu sein, hatte aber nicht von Seite "Bern" am Gebäude 2 vorbei geschaut, zum verifizieren.
NeisBot (2025-11-23 07:14:28+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/159476080 v5 | crossings=4
https://osm.org/way/159476069 v4 | crossings=4

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1715898613 v5

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175005266
HellMap (2025-12-04 00:13:27+00:00): Sveiki,

Zīmējot elementus kā laukumus, lūdzu apvieno (redaktorā C) tos ar iepriekš iezīmētiem punktiem, ja tādi ir. Citādi datos ir nepareizi dubultēti elementi vienam objektam.

Šajā gadījumā zīmējot parkingu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1452967154 , palika iepriekšējais https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11308614687 .

No citām vietām:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1444969871
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1449372893
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445398225
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1449475185
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1453991791
u.c.
Drafer ® (2025-11-23 09:30:34+00:00): Kiki Retail Park je jedini retail park u Kikindi. 13 lokala na 5.300m2, 100+ parking mesta.
Radno vreme: 9-21h
NeisBot (2025-11-22 22:46:20+00:00): Hi dra_fer2000, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #NoComment
NeisBot (2025-11-22 22:46:20+00:00): Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added department store with street, house number, postcode, and name details"
Drafer ® (2025-11-23 08:40:36+00:00): 3 Oktobra 2025 je u ovom objektu otvorena kineska robna kuća. Nekadašnji hotel pre mnogo godina, diskoteka jedno kratko vreme, prodavnica Idea...
Kristjan ESPERANTO (2025-11-23 10:50:05+00:00): I understand your intention, but the hairdresser offers vegan products for the hair. "diet:vegan" would mean they offer something vegan to eat, what is not the case.
yetzt (2025-11-23 11:08:28+00:00): diet does not nessecarily only mean food, but can refer to any regiment of consumption. 

also the wiki "Key:diet:vegan Describes if an establishment offers vegan products." does refer to products and not food in particular.
Kristjan ESPERANTO (2025-11-23 11:16:32+00:00): Hm...okay. I see your point. Your change fits the definition.

I then ask myself the question, how do we differentiate between a hairdresser who offers vegan hair products and vegan food? 🤔
Frank Peng (2025-11-24 05:34:55+00:00): Thanks for the fix! Don't know how the Virginia Tech university boundary was broken, but thanks.
CAM-Gerlach (2025-11-24 08:50:09+00:00): Thanks, just fixing my own mistake :) I'd broken it a few changesets before in #174938202 https://osmcha.org/changesets/174938202 while splitting up a landuse multipolygon into finer chunks, and somehow missed that the VT boundary also used the same way. JOSM's validator didn't catch it somehow, perhaps because the relation wasn't fully downloaded (although it usually warns on modifying an incomplete relation too which would have flagged the issue, so not sure what happened there). In any case, all fixed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175006399
CAM-Gerlach (2025-11-24 08:50:55+00:00): Thanks, just fixing my own mistake :) I'd broken it a few changesets before in #174938202 https://osmcha.org/changesets/174938202 while splitting up a landuse multipolygon into finer chunks, and somehow missed that the VT boundary also used the same way. JOSM's validator didn't catch it somehow, perhaps because the relation wasn't fully downloaded (although it usually warns on modifying an incomplete relation too which would have flagged the issue, so not sure what happened there). In any case, all fixed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175006399
schobbish (2025-11-22 22:19:52+00:00): signs*
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-25 06:54:27+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Business POIs added to the map must be visitable physical locations that are verifiable on the ground. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted adding SEO POI in a private residential dwelling, with no apparent verifiable location on the ground, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186331028
Glassman (2025-11-24 00:54:31+00:00): It is nice to add a brief changeset comment, such as "added opening hours"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175007545
trigpoint (2026-04-14 18:20:39+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/181336246
trigpoint (2026-04-14 18:20:33+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/181336246
trigpoint (2026-04-14 18:20:29+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/181336246
trigpoint (2026-04-14 18:20:23+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/181336246
trigpoint (2026-04-14 18:20:17+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/181336246
trigpoint (2026-04-14 18:20:13+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/181336246
Glassman (2025-11-24 00:59:59+00:00): I'm curious, what is #mapbattle? I see a number of new users all doing similiar edits.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175007679