piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:00:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 10:59:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
CoyKoi (2023-04-05 08:35:29+00:00): Thanks for adding the driveways, but please don't give them unnecessary names
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134514929
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:00:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 10:59:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:01:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 10:59:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
misterte (2023-04-05 11:22:53+00:00): Hallo,
nach welcher Quelle hast Du das Naturschutzgebiet  verändert ?
misterte (2023-04-05 11:23:59+00:00): allo,
hier die selbe Frage, was war Deine Quelle für die Änderung am Naturschutzgebiet ?
Fizzie-DWG (2023-04-11 04:50:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7040
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:02:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:02:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:01:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
ralley (2023-04-06 00:45:52+00:00): Thanks for adding the driveway but once again you have added a made up name.  As per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only the name tag is for genuine names only.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134515853
nyampire (2023-04-06 05:32:45+00:00): OSMへようこそ、編集をレビューしました。

とてもよく描けています！この調子で、どんどんいろいろなものを描いてみてください。

Happy Mapping！
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134516015
EoghanM (2023-04-20 10:09:17+00:00): I think you accidentally deleted the corner of The Roost pub in this changset, I've restored in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135142127
b-unicycling (2023-04-21 11:11:06+00:00): oops, sorry
silversurfer83 (2023-04-05 19:39:55+00:00): Moinsen :)
Hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159775280 hast du Zugangsberechtigungen gesetzt (bicylce=yes, foot=yes,...). Diese setzen wir an Wegen üblicherweise analog zur rechtlichen Lage vor Ort. Will heißen: Ohne explizite Schilder sollte da auch nichts gesetzt werden. 

Cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134516143
emersonveenstra (2023-04-06 10:11:00+00:00): Hi,

Did you mean to add noexit=yes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236806806/ ?
Dr Kludge (2023-04-11 18:05:03+00:00): Thank you for the notice. I fixed the issue.
ivanbranco (2023-04-13 22:17:04+00:00): Ciao Paganinho24, benvenut su OSM

"Umpalumpa" e "Fortino" sono i nomi dati ai sentieri dai bikers? In tal caso andrebbe utilizzato name:mtb=* e non name=*

bicycle=yes, foot=yes e motor_vehicle=no sono sottintesi da highway=path, non c'è bisogno di aggiungerli. (vedi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Italy)

buon mapping :)
Paganinho24 (2023-04-14 16:15:54+00:00): Ciao, spero di aver corretto nel modo giusto. Grazie!
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-05 05:50:01+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10785705368/history has material = 1612.3 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
Benoît C MdP (2023-04-05 11:27:49+00:00): Bonjour Evan

Pour info, ce n'est pas utile de remplacer la clé "cycleway:both" par "cycleway". L'intérêt de cycleway:both est que l'utilisateur spécifie bien que l'aménagement est le même des 2 côtés sans ambiguïté 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway:both

Bonne continuation

Benoît
kechan (2023-04-05 00:11:11+00:00): and roads
LockOnGuy (2023-04-05 00:56:35+00:00): Forgot to mention, I removed access=no tag from link way as it's open and added another u turn that is new.
clnd (2023-05-28 06:55:02+00:00): Why did you retag this road as a trunk road? This road should be classified as primary.
Joseph R P (2023-05-28 18:36:25+00:00): Why do you believe it should be primary? This is the most direct link between I 64 and Chippenham Parkway and connects to the southern Tuckahoe area and Bon Air.
clnd (2023-05-29 01:39:04+00:00): Well looking at the Highway classification wiki page, for state routes like Parham Rd (VA 37), "highway=trunk is for highly important routes that connect large towns and cities" Here, there are no towns or cities being connected by this road. This road also does not fit the traditional definition of a trunk road. Either side of the road can be seen to have private driveways to private homes. It seems much more appropriate to classify it as a primary road.
Joseph R P (2023-05-29 14:33:20+00:00): This section is a continuation of the partial ring road formed by VA 150/895 and does serve as a link between large towns like Short Pump/Tuckahoe and Hopewell/Petersburg as well as an inner bypass of Richmond. It's also alright for trunk roads to have driveway access, especially since every trunk road in the Richmond area has driveways when you look at them closely.
clnd (2023-05-29 21:02:37+00:00): Short Pump and Tuchkahoe are just census-designated places and do not have their own governments. Tuckahoe is a magisterial district of Henrico County but it has no individual government. While I understand it appears to be a loop, on the southside of the James river, there are interchanges with VA 150. Once VA 150 ends and becomes VA 37, it no longer has these interchanges as it going through neighborhoods. Looking at streetview level images of the two roads can clearly show why Parham should be primary and Chippenham is a trunk/motorway. As a local of the area, I know this for a fact. Looking at the trunk roads in the RVA area, they all appear to have been upgraded to trunk roads by yourself.
Joseph R P (2023-05-30 01:50:32+00:00): The legal status of a populated places should not matter when it comes to linking them to the trunk network. Arlington, for example, is a census-designated place, however it is tagged as a city and is linked to the trunk network with highways like US 1 and US 50. It's mainly all about population, and collectively, the Bon Air-Tuckahoe-Short Pump area has somewhere about ~100k residents.

For the US, the popular idea that trunk classification should only be applied to limited-access highways isn't really relevant anymore as it's been shifted to major highways and roads that connect significant populated areas and major transport hubs like airports and seaports. This has been documented in various OSM Wiki pages for most states, including Virginia, which was created by me with feedback from other people during the creation process:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Virginia/Highway_classification

A couple corrections though, VA 37 is all the way up in Winchester, and Parham is unsigned minus the section between US 1 and 95 where it is VA 73. And a lot of the highways that are classified as trunk in Richmond were trunk before I touched them if I recall correctly, such as US 60 between VA 288 and VA 150 and US 360 west of VA 150 as well as northeast from I 64.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-05 20:53:18+00:00): Try to keep the changeset size smaller.
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2023-12-01 09:17:23+00:00): Hello,
I see you have deleted the super relation for Asian Highway Network A1 (running from Tokio to Istanbul).
Please, check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Asia/Asian_Highway_Network before add or delete something related to these long relations.
I'm going to restore the deleted relation.

Cheers
  Alessandro
watmildon (2023-08-19 03:13:40+00:00): Stumbled on some of your edits while doing another project. Great work around Alleman!
felipeeugenio (2023-04-05 23:21:37+00:00): Hola Sergio
Entonces queda al oriente entre Las Pataguas y Carmen. Ese es el rango?

Otra cosa: si el semáforo solo funciona dos horas al día, entonces no lo colocamos. No hemos podido encontrar un tag para decir que está operativo esas horas solamente.

mientras buscamos lo vamos a sacar, porque hasta el momento aparece que funciona 24 horas.

saludos
pantufla (2023-04-05 15:40:27+00:00): Ey, sólo por curiosidad. Cómo conoces el nomnbre de este sitio?
mapeadora (2023-04-06 13:32:30+00:00): Hola perdón por omitir la fuente: Techo A.C. organización que trabaja en este barrio, con residentes.
HypervisorX (2023-04-05 02:41:00+00:00): This adds a trail I noticed was missing. It is my first ever contribution, so I wanted someone else to look over it and check that it meets any required guidelines and I didn't mess anything up. I did confirm the data license is OK as it is a CC0 1.0 license. If you have any suggestions or things I should have done differently please let me know, Thanks.
ivanbranco (2023-04-05 19:50:44+00:00): Hi Allouche OBAME,

please try to avoid deleting and redrawing elements: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Allouche OBAME (2024-06-08 12:59:18+00:00): Okay, got it. Thanks
BCNorwich (2023-04-05 06:41:10+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Features added to OSM must be verifiable. So is the apartment for tourist accommodation? Is the formal name "home"? Have you got the address correct as the is no 23 Cunningham Ave at that postcode?

Regards Bernard.
jmarchon (2023-04-05 05:31:30+00:00): Nice work and welcome to OSM!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134519242
CurlingMan13 (2023-11-01 12:26:45+00:00): Please use more detailed changeset comments.  What did you change, and why?
Warin61 (2023-04-06 00:01:38+00:00): Hi,
I have restored the path and marked it access=private. It is better to contact the previous mapper and get their ideas on this kind of thing - particularly when it is recent. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130144565

Another hint ... the tree area and the residential area .. those can cross one another, one being a land cover the other being a land use. 

Keep mapping, your local and can 'see' more than armchair mappers using imagery.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-15 05:27:53+00:00): What about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1076038220 ? It is no freefloating road of higher classification attached only to service road
nevw (2023-04-05 06:58:54+00:00): Excuse my ignorance - what is IG?
HBRbluemountains (2023-04-06 00:25:50+00:00): Instagram. I believe Instagram utilises OpenStreetMap on mobile and they're citing the address to be the incorrect suburb. The placement is correct but the incorrect suburb is also being used in metadata served on mobile :) Thanks!
julcnx (2023-04-05 08:44:26+00:00): Hey there Patig! Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your awesome contributions! Just a quick heads up, if the road doesn't have a sign indicating a max speed of 40km/h, it's best to remove the tag. You can find more information about this topic in this forum post: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/review-speed-limit-cases-in-thailand-that-have-mph/97428/2. Keep up the great work!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134519963
user_5359 (2023-04-11 15:57:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I revert your change set. The relation is useless and the node  have no description which type of business it is.
Dimacn (2023-04-07 14:18:12+00:00): Зачем вы удали ещё существующие объекты? Во-первых, на данный момент там убрали только заправку, всё остальное осталось и функционирует. Во-вторых, объектам которые ещё видны на спутниковых снимках рекомендуется добавлять к тегам префикс was:  Это чтобы другие маперы не добавляли объекты по снимкам. Короче, я уже вернул и поправил.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-09 17:25:06+00:00): crossing=no is not compatible with highway=crossing.
archpdx (2023-04-10 04:35:50+00:00): Thanks for bringing this to my attention and fixing it!
user_5359 (2023-04-07 14:22:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys).
syntex (2023-04-05 14:22:38+00:00): Nie wygląda na prawdziwą
karooolek (2023-04-05 14:26:23+00:00): ale co jest nieprawdziwe ;D
mieszkam tu
tak nazywamy ze znajomymi i rodziną mój dom
poza tym skorygowałęm ilość pięter
syntex (2023-04-05 16:07:49+00:00): Nie przekonałeś mnie xD
karooolek (2023-04-05 16:12:31+00:00): no cóż moge powiedzieć xD

jak zrobie wpis w wikipedii na ten temat to będzie legitnie?

panie syntex to niech pan wyjebie te zmiane i chuj

miłego wieczoru, ja ide pizze robić

juz nawet moja ulubiona openstreetmapa mnie niechce, co za kurwa smutny kraj smutne życie.

ide sie zajebać
syntex (2023-04-05 16:58:55+00:00): 😳
karooolek (2023-04-05 17:02:54+00:00): a widisz pan syntax, tego sie nie spodziewałeś że ktos na open street mapie będzie wylewał swoje ostatnie żale w życiu

jak widać nawet openstreetmapa nie uznaje mojego miejsca zamieszkania ani pobytu na tym łez padole.

pozdro 600
kwiatek_123 (2023-04-05 17:04:27+00:00): "jak zrobie wpis w wikipedii na ten temat to będzie legitnie?" To wywalą Ci post na wikipedii za nieencyklopedyczny artykuł.
karooolek (2023-04-05 17:06:53+00:00): oho przyszedł pan maruda

to w nonsensopedii wrzuce

dobra spierdalam stąd dajcie mi spokój po prostu
maraf24 (2023-04-06 19:01:03+00:00): "tak nazywamy ze znajomymi i rodziną mój dom"

To trzeba było to w loc_name umieścić i wpisać uzasadnienie do komentarza zmian.
karooolek (2023-04-06 19:21:19+00:00): wreszcie ktoś pomocny :D
brawo pan maraf24

kwiatek i syntax uczcie sie a nie zachowujecie sie jak na elektrodzie
emersonveenstra (2023-04-05 10:39:04+00:00): Hi,

Thanks again for all your mapping work! It looks like this changeset has some conflicting tag values, for example in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066813886 you have lanes=2, but turn:lanes=left|none|none, which is 3 lanes. Could you go back and make sure that the number of lanes in the lanes and turn:lanes tags are consistent with the road? Thanks!
Minh Nguyen (2023-05-20 21:27:12+00:00): Hi, it’s correct to tag these solar panel structures as roofs (or more specifically, carports). Updated in changeset 136353699.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-05 05:50:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159688509
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159835374
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159835375

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Pioko (2023-04-05 08:33:22+00:00): Dziękuję za spostrzeżenie. Adresy przepisałem z wcześniej istniejących punktów (węzłów) z adresami w tym miejscu, bez zastanawiania się czy są poprawne czy nie. Poprawki zostały naniesione. Pozdrawiam.
Enock4seth (2024-03-14 21:35:37+00:00): Hi,
Why did you decide to connect Jomo Street to La Road at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10786554480
JebelJais (2024-03-18 14:03:41+00:00): Hello Enock4seth, thank you for reaching out. I added this connection based on the now defunct Maxar Premium Imagery which indicated the connecting road is active and vehicles could travel between La Road and Jomo Street. Taking a second look, Strava traces also seem to indicate traffic through this area as well. Feel free to reach out for any further questions.
Sandal man (2023-04-05 08:04:21+00:00): Can you make the area of the change-set a little smaller, not the half of the word, but just the street where the change is made please?
Yunan973 (2023-08-10 21:57:19+00:00): Hi,

why did you keep the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12529626 with no member : do you need it for later ?

Best regards
Yunan973 (2023-08-10 21:58:30+00:00): Hi,

why did you keep the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12529627 with no member : do you need it for later ?

Best regards
pyram (2023-04-20 07:14:57+00:00): Hallo HPHenschel,
könntest Du die Adressdaten, die Du hier (aus welcher Quelle auch immer) eingetragen hast, noch einmal prüfen. Angeblich gilt dort eine andere PLZ: https://wambachers-osm.website/Postcodes.html?map=14/51.371539/11.885061&base=OSM&data=PCBDE,WPCDE

Grüße
pyram
kenken234 (2023-04-05 07:01:09+00:00): Based the district areas with data from HDB, please revert the changeset if wrong
kenken234 (2023-04-05 07:25:02+00:00): The buildings for the following residential areas seem to be slightly offset from actual location based on 'Singapore OneMap' overlay: Woodlegh Glen, Woodleign Hillside, Alkaff Courtview, Alkaff Lakeview, Alkaff Oasis and Alkaff Vista
osmviborg (2023-04-05 07:36:49+00:00): Her er det relevant at tilføjet en stump kombineret cykel/gangsti som forbinder Fjordbakken med Villemoesparken
KnudBR (2023-04-05 07:49:55+00:00): Jeg har tegnet fortov ind. Er det ok?
osmviborg (2023-04-05 08:06:08+00:00): Det er OK. Husk at forbinde veje/fortove med hinanden, af hensyn til routing, ingen løse ender.
habi (2023-04-05 07:55:02+00:00): Ciao  Simsalasim

Der Zaun mit `fence_type=pferdezaun` hinzuzufügen ist witzig :)
Ich würde - anhand des OSM Wikis - einen anderen Zauntyp vergeben, einer der am besten passt von hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:fence_type

Gruss,
habi
Simsalasim (2023-04-05 10:56:47+00:00): Danke für die Inof, habs entsprechend angepasst.
silversurfer83 (2023-04-05 20:02:25+00:00): Moin
Da wo der Schotterweg in der Kurve auf den schon vorhandenen Weg trifft waren eine Grenze, die Landnutzungsfläche und die Wege in einem Punkt verbunden. Das ist eher ungünstig und macht die Wartung der Daten schwieriger.
Wenn du mit iD arbeitest wäre es schön, wenn du etwas genauer darauf achten könntest, dass sich die Punkte unterschiedlicher Objekte nicht unnötig verbinden. Der Editor neigt leider dazu nahegelegene Punkte zusammenzuschnappen. Gerade Landnutzung sollte nicht mit Wegen verbunden werden und Grenzen sollten auch für sich verlaufen, selbst wenn sie parallel zu anderen Objekten liegen.
Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134526546
literan (2023-04-05 19:51:10+00:00): вы в очередной раз сломали маршрут автобуса неаккуратными правками. Больше разгребать я за вами это не буду, правка будет откачена. При упорствовании буду обращаться за вашей блокировкой
user_5359 (2023-04-07 11:58:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove you SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys)
habi (2023-04-05 08:05:34+00:00): Eigentlich ja vor allem den Pingpong-Tisch wiederhergestellt :)
julcnx (2023-04-05 08:26:24+00:00): hi Summittra, what is the meaning of your motorcar=no? is the road too narrow for cars? or is there a sign saying no cars are allowed ? Please refer to this thread for more info: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/re-classifying-service-alley-and-other-narrow-roads-chiang-mai/97397
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134527052
Jordi MF (2023-04-05 14:30:18+00:00): Hola,
Moltes gràcies per millora les dades d'OpenStreetMap. He vist que has mapejat dos parcs anomenats "Sistema Local de Espacios Libres" en Vila-real. Les ortofotos no mostren cap parc lúdic que consistisca en una ordenació de zones verdes amb espais d'oci dins d'estes àrees. Per tant, no tinc clar que esta zona es tracte d'un parc. Tampoc no he trobat cap lloc, com en la pàgina web de l'Ajuntament de Vila-real o al Cadastre, on es faça referència a estos parc anomenats "Sistema Local de Espacios Libres". El Cadastre sí que mostra eixa zona com urbana, així que supose que, en un futur, s'hi ampliarà el polígon industrial. De moment, com això no s'ha produït, s'hauria d'utilitzar una etiqueta "natural=*" per a indicar el tipus de vegetació que hi ha o "landuse" si es tracta de zones de cultiu.
Salutacions,
Jordi
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
eggie (2023-04-05 14:18:57+00:00): Dag R Win... De hoofdtag is leisure=playground
Nu heb je alleen de specificatie ingevuld en zie je dus niets op de kaart.
Kijk je nog even. 
MVG
eggie
julcnx (2023-04-05 08:31:19+00:00): Hey there! I noticed that you made a change to a node in Germany while editing in Vietnam. Was this a mistake or unintended?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134527530
ToniE (2023-04-05 11:12:53+00:00): Well, I guess, noexit=yes on a node of a landuse=forest is an unintended mistake.