piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Volker_Kerkhoff (2024-10-07 06:14:40+00:00): Hi, the communication:amateur_radio:pota tag is for an amateur radio program which consists in operating amateur radio from state or federal parks and nature reserves. You can read more about it at https://pota.app, The change to leisure=park must have been accidental, sorry about that, still new to OSM editing. Let me correct that.
kapazao (2024-10-09 08:41:49+00:00): Thank for the answer and fixing it.
Regards
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-05 15:20:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149588297

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mmkay (2024-10-05 17:24:24+00:00): Dzięki, rzeczywiście była literówka w nazwie ulicy :) Poprawione w https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149588297/history/4
mavl (2024-11-13 05:46:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159076666, 159076665, 159076660 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
VLD549 (2025-01-15 14:18:16+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. I can't see if this cycleway is Baarsjeskade. Neither beeldmateriaal.nl, nor BAG nor Bing Maps shows it.
Thank you for providing a link of some sort!
FM2441 (2025-01-15 15:01:56+00:00): Dit is te vinden in de PDOK-viewer, laag NWB (Nationaal Wegen Bestand).

https://app.pdok.nl/viewer/#x=106919.00&y=450808.50&z=14.0000&background=BRT-A%20standaard&layers=
VLD549 (2025-03-14 15:04:12+00:00): Thank you!
woodpeck (2024-10-23 10:54:21+00:00): Please explain the meaning of  your changeset comment "nb nghgnb nb SXSXDDDDDDDDDXXCFGFGGGGGGGGGGGGGTGTTTTTT".
Barroszt (2024-10-24 18:20:28+00:00): Na szczęście zmiana została szybko zauważona, po prostu nie zabezpieczyłem mojego konta przed wandalami.
trial (2025-08-19 08:48:42+00:00): You could have kept old_name=Géant Casino or was:brand=Géant Casino as it ma be still known under the old name.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-05 15:42:46+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Złota":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12227996523

"Kazimierza Pułaskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12227996538

"Piękna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12227996624

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
umapjpnic793 (2024-10-05 16:34:14+00:00): thanks, I never realized my mistake...
chris2map (2024-10-07 11:29:27+00:00): your welcome!
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-02 23:53:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159862440, 159862427, 159862512, 159862481, 159862457, 159862433 where the changeset comment is: revert roblox_gmx edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16954
spiregrain (2024-10-05 19:46:08+00:00): Hello,

One result of your recent changes to Stratford station has been that all the new indoor highway areas now appear the same as the nearby outdoor highway areas.  E.g. you cant tell from the default osm.org map where the station building actually is.  Do you plan to do anything about this?  Maybe the indoor=yes tag, or looking again at the levels around the roof.

Thanks for adding all the extra detail - must have taken a lot of time to figure out all the passageways and escalators, etc.
spiregrain (2024-10-05 20:00:54+00:00): Maybe something like this indoor corridor would be more appropriate - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1302845334
小智智 (2024-10-05 22:54:28+00:00): I have added indoor=yes

Are there better ways to do that without breaking routing?
spiregrain (2024-10-06 08:49:12+00:00): Do you have a particular router in mind?  My understanding is that some (most? all?) of them don't route through areas anyway, so there always has to be a linear way to show them where to go.
小智智 (2024-10-06 08:53:21+00:00): I'm currently working with OpenTripPlanner with area handling enabled, with the aim that accurate and realistic information can be delivered to people how long it takes and how to access platforms for train services.

Even if a router doesn't support areas, it will still route along the edge of these areas.
小智智 (2024-10-06 08:54:50+00:00): I have just surveyed London Bridge as well and, given how the station looks like, it is impossible to map the National Rail ground level by anything but just slap two areas (paid and unpaid) into it.
spiregrain (2024-10-06 09:15:01+00:00): Do you think Opentripplanner can route indoor=room or indoor=corridor if the highway tag is not used?
小智智 (2024-10-06 09:17:31+00:00): Anyway I have just retagged Stratford with linear ways and indoor=area

I will do it later with London Bridge but without linear ways (as it is impossible there) to see what it will happen.
spiregrain (2024-10-06 09:23:56+00:00): That seems to have fixed the eastern half.   But the part north of platforms 13/14/15 is still overlapping the roof.  

So good!
小智智 (2024-10-06 09:33:30+00:00): Sorry I've just missed it
eggie (2024-10-05 17:26:50+00:00): Hi Christian..

The  osm tag for hotel is
.. tourism=hotel
Greetz..
eggie
eggie (2024-10-05 20:15:19+00:00): added tourism hotel... removed hotel California
Gr eggie
aTarom (2024-10-06 07:12:15+00:00): Igual que mensaje anterior, fuente para "name:esu"? Yupik?
kapazao (2024-10-06 10:39:50+00:00): Hola, ¿puedes explicar este "parque"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157509369
eggie (2024-10-05 18:24:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Realiseer je dat alles dat je upload.. dus ook een test... daadwerkelijk op wereldkaart van OSM komt.
Het bos heb ik teruggelegd.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Florek89 (2024-10-06 20:54:52+00:00): It is the only way to come to houses. In Poland tracks are only there where they lead to fields, grasslands or forests.

I changes these ways to residential.
DiogoBaptista98 (2026-06-04 01:06:55+00:00): The tags oneway=yes and roundabout=yes are incorrect. A roundabout should be mapped using junction=roundabout, which already implies one-way traffic according to OpenStreetMap tagging conventions. Therefore, roundabout=yes should be replaced with junction=roundabout.
Matija Nalis (2025-08-16 22:32:27+00:00): Hi @mueschel

I've noticed you've changed `image:menu` to `menu:url` in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12211682359/history/3

Is there a reason? Neither seems documented on the wiki and both seem to have similar (few dozen) usages.

But changing it breaks https://mapcomplete.org/food.html in this case, so there is that disadvantage.

Did you perhaps mean more popular (and documented) website:menu ?

Also see https://source.mapcomplete.org/MapComplete/MapComplete/issues/2498
mueschel (2025-08-17 06:58:00+00:00): This is what happens if some software developer decides to add new tags without discussion and documentation.

"menu:url" was the tag used until a while ago (that is the tag in line with others like "opening_hours:url"). 
Then somebody forced the use of "website:menu" (which is technically wrong and against the definition of 'website' and 'url' tags in case of images or PDF) through a not well prepared tagging challenge. 
And now mapcomplete introduced yet another tag. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/adding-image-menu-on-resturants/120806
- problematic because of very unclear copyright situation
- opposed by half of the mappers participating in the discussion
- misusing panoramax street-level images as generic image hosting
msevilla00 (2024-10-06 12:40:51+00:00): El polígono, el nombre y que haya un parque estan erróneos. Por favor revisa tus ediciones. Aqui lo que hay es un campo de cultivo no un parque.
msevilla00 (2024-10-06 11:58:58+00:00): Hola ccampoy;
Estás incluyendo polígonos que no parecen que sean parques como se muestra en la ortofoto. Así mismo les estás incluyendo un nombre de una fuente que no parece extraida sobre el terreno.
Por favor, revisa tus ediciones porque no son correctas.
Gracias
jeslop (2024-10-06 14:15:38+00:00): Hola ccampoy. Gracias por colaborar con OSM. Para familiarizarte con el proyecto deberías leer en primer lugar https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_de_principiantes. Tus ediciones deben ajustarse a las directrices de la comunidad. En esta por ejemplo, además de duplicar una característica que ya existía en el mapa, incluyes un parque que no existe sobre el terreno.
Lo he revertido. 
Un saludo,

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Frans S (2024-10-10 12:04:12+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------

A: Inaccurate mapping.

D: Connecting Nodes to other features.
E: Buildings not squared.
High building(s) incorrect mapped. See par 20 chapter About Buildings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157509899
mavl (2024-11-13 08:02:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159079861, 159079853, 159079862 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
adiatmad (2024-10-09 04:38:44+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! Happy mapping! Just a quick question: what does layer=-1 mean in this context? Thanks
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1321452565)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157510469
Jonathan Danforth (2024-10-06 03:12:51+00:00): Hi, I live very near this place and walk by it frequently. This is not a service road, but a private driveway, entirely located on a single private lot. I'm new to OSM, so I don't know whether there is a way to indicate a private driveway, or whether it should be mapped at all in OSM.
dmlls (2024-10-06 09:41:36+00:00): Hi Jonathan and welcome to OSM!

Take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property for a good explanation on why private roads shouldn't be deleted.

To mark the fact that it's private, you should add the tag `access=private`. To specify that it's a driveway, you can add `service=driveway`. You can find further tags that might be relevant for this feature in the Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice.

Hope that helps, happy mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
ghostrider44 (2024-10-10 09:21:10+00:00): Hallo ns130291,
schau dir mal folgende Seite an:

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BW/DE-BW-VVS-Analysis.html#bus_566 

Laut Chronik hast du am 05.10.2024 in diesem Bereich Änderungen vorgenommen:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157511278 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/459621778 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1321455910 

Nun stimmt die Busrelation 566 nicht mehr.
Bei der Busrelation müssen die Teilstücke in der korrekten Reihenfolge aufgeführt werden, wie sie der Bus auch fährt.

Bringst du die Relation wieder in Ordnung?

Gruß ghostrider44
ns130291 (2024-10-10 19:58:27+00:00): Hi ghostrider44,

sollte jetzt wieder passen, wurde durch die Umwandlung zur Einbahnstraße ausgelöst.
Hatte nicht gesehen, dass die Relation in beide Richtungen durch das gleiche Stück Straße definiert war.

Viele Grüße
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 00:59:44+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164747018
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
ManuelB701 (2024-10-05 17:58:24+00:00): You removed kerbs, though. These at those traffic islands is understandable, though it still makes sense to keep them in case someone goes over them with StreetComplete or somthing (or at the very least, retag them to kerb=no if you know the actual type as the Wiki recommends it because that painted line might look like tactile paving) but the flush kerbs at crossings are still kerbs and should not be removed.
Laffelrog (2024-10-06 11:15:18+00:00): Thanks for your feedback! I noticed you've re-added the kerbs. Is everything correct now, or is further updating needed? I can take a look in person when I'm back in the area.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
adiatmad (2024-10-08 12:59:41+00:00): Hi, just to confirm, what does layer=-1 mean for a building? Happy mapping!

(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1321457667)
olo81 (2024-10-25 22:40:25+00:00): Stacja metroroweru już jest w tym miejscu naniesiona. Jeżeli pozycja jest do poprawy wystarczy przesunąć.
Lyon-St-Clair (2025-02-16 21:41:54+00:00): bonjour,

à l'avenir évitez d'indiquer comme active des lignes de chemin de fer enterrées sous 3 tonnes de terre ou végétation depuis 15 ans ;)
Luzandro (2024-10-11 10:37:59+00:00): Hallo,

der Übergang ist nun nicht mehr mit dem gegenüberliegenden Gehsteig verbunden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_foot&route=48.240420%2C16.339685%3B48.240579%2C16.339899

auch abgesehen davon sehe ich keinen wirklichen Vorteil zu segregated=yes, wenn die Spuren völlig parallel verlaufen und nicht bspw. durch eine Grünfläche getrennt sind
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157512671
matt_ellery (2024-10-17 20:00:58+00:00): Hi M4rkle,

I couldn't see any indication or signs showing that pedestrians are intended to use the track (not footpath) changed here. What was your intention when adding foot=designated?

All the best,
Matt
TrickyFoxy (2024-10-26 14:26:58+00:00): You drew a huge strange building on top of other buildings. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1321464233/history#map=18/6.853264/79.904704

I removed them, but perhaps you wanted to draw the area with the amenity= tag. Check, please
Puxan (2024-10-06 08:00:50+00:00): Hola, veo que estás añadiendo muchas traducciones de nombres al español. Desde mi punto de vista los nombres propios como Andreu Ferrer no deben traducirse, sólo en el caso de reyes u otros personajes muy importantes se contempla el uso de traducción del nombre
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157513268
Jordi MF (2024-10-06 17:35:54+00:00): Aquest usuari que ha estat blocat anteriorment i continua creant comptes incomplint els Termes d'Ús d'OSM. Per tant, no té permís per a seguir editant. Jo no malgastaria temps buscant tots els errors, que en són molts. Convindria revertir-ho tot.
SisterOdrade (2024-10-05 19:20:07+00:00): I added house numbers to a street I visited.
toster234 (2024-10-15 00:40:12+00:00): Hej, zapoznaj się proszę jak powinno się dodawać godziny otwarcia. Nie wpisujemy tam po prostu tekstu...

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:opening%20hours?uselang=pl
silversurfer83 (2024-10-05 19:35:01+00:00): Moin justmoax,

diese Straße hat schon die Eigenschaft "vehicle=destination" (seit mindestens Märt 2022). Wenn du also mit dem PKW dort hindurch geroutet wirst, obwohl dein Ziel nicht eins der Grundstücke dort ist, dann ist das ein Fehler deiner Navisoftware und nicht unserer Daten.
Nun haben wir hier widersprüchliche Daten, denn entweder steht dort ein VZ250 + Rad frei ODER es steht dort ein VZ260. Kannst du mir sagen, was es ist?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157514267
Metzor (2024-10-11 04:58:42+00:00): Hallo justmoax,

Danke, dass du mittlerweile so gute Beschreibungen für deine Änderungssätze einträgst!

Wir sind hier in einem Gemeinschaftsprojekt :-)
Insofern wäre es klasse, wenn du auch auf Fragen zu deinen Änderungen antworten würdest. Einfach hierher gehen und im Browser antworten: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157514267#map=17/51.352420/9.480890

Viele Grüße
Metzor
Langlaeufer (2024-10-10 18:19:26+00:00): Was steht denn da genau auf dem Schild? Landwirtschaftlicher Kraftverkehr und Anlieger sind frei
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157514275
Faltradfahrer (2024-10-11 12:29:44+00:00): Hoppla, da habe ich wohl den falschen Wegteil erwischt. Ich habe noch mal etwas korrigiert.
Von Norden von der L480 kommend sind die ersten ca. 300m noch zugänglich. Dann steht man vor einem Schlagbaum mit einem Schild "Betreten des Geländes, Baden u. Angeln verboten!...."
@Langlaeufer: Ist das so OK?
Es ist für Radfahrer aus Richtung Gronau kommend jedenfalls kein legaler Weg zur Umfahrung der B3 in Richtung Alfeld. Richtig?
Langlaeufer (2024-10-11 18:39:52+00:00): Ich hab mal versucht das zu verbessern. So habe ich das verstanden:  Der Weg ist eine Zufahrt zum Abbau und kein Feldweg. Bis zur Schranke ist der Zugang frei. Danach ist der Zutritt privat.
Langlaeufer (2024-10-11 18:40:45+00:00): Beschilderung von Süden kennst du nicht, oder`?
Faltradfahrer (2024-10-11 18:57:27+00:00): Richtig verstanden!
Der kleine Weg westlich, direkt vor der Bahn, ist übrigens auch nicht erlaubt bzw. von der Straße aus vegetationsbedingt derzeit fast nicht mehr existent. 
Und nein, von Süden kenne ich die Ecke nicht. Ich wollte mal bei Dehnsen über den Bahnübergang und nach Norden weiter, bin aber noch nicht dazu gekommen. Ich wohne aber auch nicht in der Ecke, bin nur alle paar Jahre mal in der Umgebung unterwegs.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Edelsalami (2025-07-09 13:08:00+00:00): Hallo Mond00, du hast mit diesem Changeset Hochspannungsmasten erstellt, die nicht existieren. Bitte baue doch in Zukunft eine manuelle Prüfung deiner Änderungen ein. Danke. Gruß
Mond00 (2025-07-09 18:36:36+00:00): Danke für die Hilfe. Es kann sein, das es Punkte ohne Information an der Hochspannung waren. Trotz Kontrolle kann mal etwas übersehen werden.
Edelsalami (2025-07-09 18:56:08+00:00): Jetzt mal Tacheles: Alle bearbeiteten Nodes in diesem CS sind falsch. So ziemlich jeder CS den du mittels Osmose erstellt hast, sieht ähnlich falsch aus. Du hast da gar nichts kontrolliert, sondern einfach stumpf auf "Ändern" oder sowas geklickt. Da du offensichtlich nicht motiviert bist deine CS selbst zu überprüfen, müssen das nun andere Leute tun. Ich sehe nicht, inwiefern sich dein Verhalten von Vandalismus unterscheidet.
Mond00 (2025-07-09 19:12:27+00:00): Bei den Masten habe ich mich leider vertan und ändere auch keine mehr. Schaue schon ins Wiki rein und prüfe ob der Änderungsvorschlag in Ordnung ist. Drücke nicht nur stumpf auf ändern. Bei Sparkasse n wird zum Beispiel der falsche operator vorgeschlagen und ändere da keinen. Möchte etwas gutes tun und keine Fehler produzieren.
Edelsalami (2025-07-09 20:35:23+00:00): Fehler passieren, keine Frage. Leider ist sowas wie dieser CS kein Einzelfall. Schau doch zB mal in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157565400
Dort hast du auch jede Menge Fehler eingebaut. Wirst du das korrigieren?
Mond00 (2025-07-11 18:42:52+00:00): ist auch korrigiert
totera (2024-10-06 21:49:05+00:00): L'utente ha modificato il tracciato della ciclovia Adriatica senza tenere conto dello stato reale dei luoghi, copiando da un progetto non del tutto realizzato o realizzato diversamente (vedi https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157556615)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157558800
totera (2024-10-06 21:49:06+00:00): L'utente ha modificato il tracciato della ciclovia Adriatica senza tenere conto dello stato reale dei luoghi, copiando da un progetto non del tutto realizzato o realizzato diversamente (vedi https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157556615)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157558800
totera (2024-10-06 21:49:07+00:00): L'utente ha modificato il tracciato della ciclovia Adriatica senza tenere conto dello stato reale dei luoghi, copiando da un progetto non del tutto realizzato o realizzato diversamente (vedi https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157556615)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157558800
Nakaner (2024-11-05 10:28:29+00:00): Hallo,

nach dem gescheiterten Bürgerentscheid für die Wiederaufnahme der Stadtbahn-Planungen in Durmersheim kann man diese Ways doch eigentlich komplett löschen?

Viele Grüße

Michael
StC (2025-02-20 17:05:16+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset et celui qui précède ne correspondent pas aux principes de gestion des réseaux dans OSM : il faut une relation par itinéraire entre deux poteaux. Si vous voulez de l'aide sur ce sujet pas toujours simple, en vue de devenir autonome, moi ou d'autres volontaires pouvons vous faire une démonstration.
Avant-Pays-Savoyard-CM (2025-02-24 09:46:46+00:00): Bonjour,
Oui effectivement... preneur d'une démonstration pour respecter la bonne procédure!
Mxdanger (2024-10-07 22:21:56+00:00): Try and keep the changeset in a smaller area. I see you edited a track up north creating the large bbox.

Also, when adding buildings make sure to combine the address node with the building. (Select both and press C)
cuzi (2024-10-07 22:28:52+00:00): Sorry that was an unintentional change
cuzi (2024-10-07 22:42:45+00:00): Is this a specific guideline in California to combine building and address?