piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Molly Noa (2026-04-14 12:15:08+00:00): Hi there, I was just trying to add the multiuse trail to the Bike Streets map, but I clearly did something wrong. I was having issues with my computer continually crashing while I was trying to use Open Street Maps. Is there a way to delete my changesets?
CAM-Gerlach (2026-04-14 15:28:05+00:00): Hi Molly, thanks for the fast and considerate response! I'm really sorry if I gave you the impression you did something wrong; to clarify again while the the two access tags you added in your changeset are already de-facto implied by highway=cycleway , there's certainly nothing wrong with adding them explicitly (in fact, I would encourage it!) so not to worry! As such, there's no need to revert your changeset (changes and the changes they introduce cannot under normal circumstances be deleted, but much like with Git they can be reverted, either manually or with semi-automated tools).

The main reason I reached out was because I was a bit confused by your changeset comment, which implied multi-use path was being added to the map when it already existed and was tagged as such, and wanted to help clear up any misunderstanding. Based on your helpful clarification above, Bike Streets should presumably already recognize a highway=cycleway as being accessible to bikes (by definition), and also to pedestrian traffic given `foot=yes` is tagged; if not, seems like a bug that could hopefully be easily fixed.

Furthermore, I don't think you're ultimately responsible for this confusion--it seems there may be something with Bike Streets' custom private deployment of the iD OSM editor, or else something common to your organization, that is causing similar confusion as another Bike Streets mapper submitted a changeset around the same time as you where not only did the changes not match the changeset comment (much more so than you), but in fact the only change was what appeared to be an accidental node drag of an address point which (unlike your changes) appears to be a clear mistake. So no worries, you're good!

Happy to help clarify further or answer any followup questions I can--feel free to reach out further here or via OSM direct message. Cheers!
Udarian (2026-04-13 00:13:21+00:00): the website for the hotel seems to still exist and go by the name of "Eden Roc" https://www.edenrochotelmiami.com/ , looking further into it, it seems like the Nobu Hotel only takes up part of this building and thus should not take up the whole area of the building.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
Wildsharky (2026-04-13 12:00:59+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181257614
Shel_Sri (2026-06-22 15:58:00+00:00): Hello JaneAmerica12, Thank You for your contribution. 
I have fixed validation error for highway intersections.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
Piskvor (2026-04-13 11:32:32+00:00): Ahoj, 

Bylo potřeba odebírat ty refs? Jako dvojka je to v terénu značený, a 333 je to v oficiální dokumentaci. Už teď je v tom guláš, netřeba zahazovat validní tagy... 

Díky, Piskvor
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2026-04-13 12:38:23+00:00): Ahoj,
bylo to tam trochu roztrhaně, tak jsem si řekl, že tam nebudou třeba. Když tak mi tu oficiální dokumentaci ukaž, pokud je to až od začátku Vinohradské ulice, a já je tam doplním. Existuje někde i mapa pražských tahů podle oficiální dokumentace?
Piskvor (2026-04-13 12:56:44+00:00): Je to mapa Ředitelství silnic a dálnic, to je snad oficiální dostatečně. Máš ale pravdu, jako 333 je to značený až od MÚK Průmyslová. I/2 sice začíná až v Říčanech, ale OTG je značená právě už od Průmyslový dál na jih.

https://geoportal.rsd.cz/apps/silnicni_a_dalnicni_sit_cr_verejna/?composition=64f69
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2026-04-13 13:24:06+00:00): Takže jsem ty zbytky dobře smazal. Jenom mě udivuje u vnitřního městského okruhu číslo 29, jako kdybychom měli mít v Česku dvě různé silnice I/29.
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2026-04-13 14:11:37+00:00): A jak je to třeba u silnice II/607 s tím primary a secondary, když v terénu je 607 a v oficiální dokumentaci 7?
Piskvor (2026-04-13 15:01:37+00:00): 60x obvykle znamená "bývalá silnice I/x převedena na dálnici Dx, původní trasa je přeznačena jako silnice II/60x". Primárně bych se řídil OTG: že je to někde v projektu jako 7, ale situace v realitě se posunula, to je medle normální a očekávatelný.
aceman444 (2026-06-15 20:38:46+00:00): Na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1498895551 su naozaj az 4 odbocovacie pruhy? Cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46692208 k tomu vedie a tam su vyznacene len 2 odbocovacie doprava. Ak teda vobec ten usek este existuje/funguje, tento vikend tam nieco prerabali a na Zlate piesky sa vraj musi odbocit uz skor (od D1/D4).
mapko (2026-06-15 22:59:58+00:00): To bol nejaky preklep. Ups, zabudol som otvorit kolektor a zmazat co je uz minulostou.
aceman444 (2026-06-16 07:15:04+00:00): Dakujem.

Co sa tyka dialnicnych vyjazdov, naozaj sa https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2685044281 aj https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2685044303 v jednom smere volaju Bratislava-Vychod 14?

A https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2685044389 je Ivanka pri Dunaji 25 ale v opacnom smere https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3326780164 je to Bratislava-Vychod 25 ?
mapko (2026-06-16 20:02:23+00:00): Ano, oba su vychod, je to ta ista krizovatka. Jedine co si myslim ze by tam malo byt inak je cislo - 15. (projekty a ZDZ maju uz sekvencne cislovanie, ktore sa na DZ prelepuje podla kilometrovnika).
Tam je isty chaos, ktory je sposobneny, ze len niektore ZDZ sa meni spolu s vystavbou D1xD4.
iandees (2026-04-13 00:44:56+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8840179276 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181253365, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
pantufla (2026-04-13 23:44:49+00:00): Bienvenido de vuelta :)
NeisBot (2026-04-12 22:16:18+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, Lux42.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added houses"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
muralito (2026-04-18 03:55:14+00:00): Por las dudas, y antes de que se te ocurra esa pronunciación, te aclaro que en Uruguay ese apellido no lleva tilde y se acentúa en la e.
eggie (2026-04-13 06:56:59+00:00): Gebouw teruggezet. Staat er geen gebouw?
Gr eggie
makebelieve (2026-04-13 07:38:54+00:00): Jawel, mijn fout, excuus!
eggie (2026-04-13 08:01:39+00:00): No problem...
eggie (2026-04-13 06:51:54+00:00): Dag Makebelieve.Staat er geen gebouw meer? building=yes Je heb het verwijderd?

MVG
eggie
makebelieve (2026-04-13 07:40:16+00:00): Jawel, mijn fout, ik wilde alleen de functie toevoegen, dus goed dat je hem hebt teruggezet
habi (2026-05-05 14:17:19+00:00): Ciao ydrgbjo
Die Adresse vom Schulhaus ist schon bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/498496346 korrekt erfasst, da braucht es das (umstrittene) `addr:full` hier nicht mehr.
Du packst das immer wieder an viele Objekte, und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr:* beschreibt `addr:full` als "nicht auswertbar".
Ich find' das ist (gerade hier) unnötig, da die Adressdaten schon voll korrekt erfasst sind.
Brauchst du diese Addressdaten irgenwo in einer Auswertung?
Gruss,
Habi

PS: Ich lande hier wegen etwas ganz anderem, nämlich dem Tippfehler `highway=Orthofotos Bern`, den du hier auch gemacht und ich korrigiert habe.
iandees (2026-04-13 00:45:12+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9170576364 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181253373, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Jordi MF (2026-04-13 00:03:29+00:00): Hola Alex,

Muchas gracias por mejorar OSM. En los últimos conjuntos de cambios que has realizado, aunque está genial que dits los edificios d forma individual, ten cuidado porque estás eliminando información correcta y muy útil. En concreto, estás eliminando las direcciones de entrada a los edificios, con el nombre de la calle y el número de portal.

Ya lo he corregido en un "changeset" anterior. En este, no. Saludos y buen mapeo!
NeisBot (2026-04-12 23:16:17+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, Elise Strahan.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added buildings"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
LuigiPitanga (2026-04-13 21:05:08+00:00): Cancelar o POI pois a sede foi fechada. Aguardando encontrar outro lugar.
Mannivu (2026-04-13 16:00:53+00:00): Hi, I'm not sure what happened but this created a weird geometry in the way which I've fixed it in changeset/181259655
iandees (2026-04-13 16:28:48+00:00): Huh, interesting. Sorry for making it worse and thanks for fixing it. I'll be more careful and check what others have done since I notice the drag.
nevw (2026-04-13 01:32:03+00:00): Hi, I think the eagle is spelled wrong.
https://birdlife.org.au/bird-profiles/wedge-tailed-eagle/
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-06 02:51:00+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182274753
NeisBot (2026-04-13 00:16:18+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, Hassan Abdullah Harki.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added buildings, addresses, and stadium details in Duhok province"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
iandees (2026-04-13 00:45:24+00:00): Hi! It looks like the website URL on way/1323977947 may have been copied from Google Maps (it contained Google tracking parameters). Please be careful not to copy information from Google into OpenStreetMap, as Google's data is copyrighted.
NeisBot (2026-04-13 00:26:16+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, ellemeffert.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added buildings"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
MappingMore (2026-04-15 06:33:39+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181351431
MassCartog (2026-04-13 13:18:08+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. Features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property
NPIJPF (2026-04-13 15:44:30+00:00): The dirt road no longer connects Cameron Way to Starr Lane. That access point has been closed, and trees have been planted in its place.

Currently, delivery drivers (Amazon, Uber Eats, Grubhub, etc.) are being directed by their GPS systems to attempt access via the driveway at 95 Cameron Way. This is private property with a gated entrance and call button. Drivers are repeatedly using the call button trying to gain access to a road that no longer exists.

This issue needs to be corrected and clearly marked as no access/not a through street. If it continues, we will have no choice but to involve local authorities, as this is private property and not a public roadway.

Please advise on what steps will be taken to resolve this.
MassCartog (2026-04-13 18:17:39+00:00): Hello thanks for the reply! And for the added information about the newly planted trees and disconnected roadway.

The reason your changes was restore was your original changeset description gave an invalid reason to remove features from OSM. 

I've update the map to reflect how you just described it on the ground. It has already been marked as access=private so no change was done there.

Please note OSM data is a record what exists in reality, removing feature that exist on the ground is causing damage to OSM database and could be considered vandalism. Features not on a public roadways or delivery drivers trespassing is not a valid reason to remove existing features from OSM. Thanks!

If your interested in learning more:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism

osm.wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property
woodpeck (2026-04-18 11:45:41+00:00): The LWG has received a message about this from a lawyer claiming to represent the owner of 95 Cameron Way. I responded that the connection between the property and Starr Lane has been severed in OSM, trusting the owner's word that trees have been planted there. I have also explained that, should we find out upon survey that the connection does in fact exist and is only blocked by legal, not physical, means, it will be reinstated in OSM and marked with access=private.
MassCartog (2026-04-18 13:24:33+00:00): Thanks for the information woodpeck and your work. Sorry the LWG had to deal with this after the road had already been disconnected and marked access=private after the initial request.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-06 02:52:03+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182274775
Yuri Matias (2026-04-13 02:41:28+00:00): A sinalização nesse trecho estava correta e você mudou indiscriminadamente para 60 km/h. Os radares, inclusive, são de 50 km/h.
felipeeugenio (2026-04-13 11:23:28+00:00): Hola. Un par de comentarios.
1) los caminos son provados (en OSM) hasta que te encuentras con el portón (salvo excepciones). Para efectos de un portón que queda muy cerca de la calle, hay que partír el camino en dos, siendo privado solo el segmento interior (+ el portón)
2) un camino residencial es un camino que tiene accesos a casas en casi la totalidad de su extensión. Hay algunos caminos acá que mas parecer =service.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181253445
rosbeef (2026-04-13 11:48:48+00:00): Hola perdón no soy nativo español.
No entiendo bien el concepto calle de servicio.
Todas las modificaciones que hicé eran de un acceso a por lo menos una casa.
Desde cuantas casas se puede definir como residencial o con cual densidad ?
felipeeugenio (2026-04-13 12:14:41+00:00): Hola. (prefieres inglés)
Como casi todo en OSM, no hay una frontera definida. Hasta cierto punto queda todo a criterio.
El Camino de servicio (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice) sirve para entrar a una propiedad/tienda etc...
Si hay solo un puñado de casas, y el camino es solo de acceso y no hay masa suficiente para que haya una circulación constante de vehículos, es mejor =service.
En zonas rurales en Chile a veces la propiedad es una sola; sin embargo, se construyen 3, 4 o 5 casas. En ese caso es mejor =service.

Solo agregaría residential/living_street en caso de que sea un condominio/loteo/parcelación o ya derechamente una urbanización.

Acabo de hacer las correcciones y dejar los caminos con el access= separado de acuerdo al portón que agregaste.

En todo caso eres bienvenido si te quieres sumar al chat de la comunidad chilena en Telegram en el link en mi Bio.

saludos
rosbeef (2026-04-13 21:23:16+00:00): Gracias pour la explicacion y las correcciones . 
Por la invitacion me disculpo pero no (quiero) usar telegram (ni whatsapp). Uso matrix o signal pero ya la comu esta en telégam de lo que entiendo.
felipeeugenio (2026-04-14 21:21:49+00:00): Hola.
Hay un bridge de Matrix para la gente que quiere acceder al chat de Telegram sin descargar la aplicación.

No sé si necesitas más indicaciones que esas, porque la verdad es que no sé cómo se usa, pero hay varios maperos que lo hacen así.

saludos
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-06 02:53:07+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182274794
maxwellward (2026-04-13 20:21:09+00:00): Hello! Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution.

When contributing, please ensure that your changeset comments are descriptive of what was done, not simply "update" or random text. This helps other mappers get an idea of what was done without having to dive into the changed objects list.

Additionally, when mapping buildings, please draw the outline of the building, not of the plot of land the building is on.

If you wish to map the fence or wall around the buildings plot of land, you can use barrier=wall or barrier=fence on a way.

Please let me know if you have any questions :)

Max
felipeeugenio (2026-04-13 11:26:53+00:00): Casi la totalidad de caminos residenciales de está y las ediciones anteriores son accesos a casas. Los estoy convirtiendo a =service.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181253646
Kovoschiz (2026-04-13 07:39:40+00:00): Can you stop deleting first, and explain what's wrong?
CAM-Gerlach (2026-04-14 03:04:16+00:00): Hi Between2Burgs, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Could you help us understand what you were trying to achieve in this changeset? The changeset comment refers to a bike route and "marking" (not sure how?) alleyways parallel to N Main. However, the only change in this changeset is what appears to be an accidental node drag of the Unit 2 address for 619 Progress St around 25 m to the NW. I'm happy to go ahead and revert that for you, but I wanted to reach out first to see if you could help me understand what you actually intended to do here, so I could help you understand how to achieve it.

Also, just a heads up--as you appear to be part of the [Bike Streets organized editing activity](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Bike_Streets), per the [OSM Organized Editing Policy](https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines) please make sure you are familiar with the latter, disclose that fact on your user profile and link to the former wiki page, and include a unique hashtag and the same link on your changesets, among other requirements. Your organizer should also make sure you are familiar with local and OSM community consensus, mapping practices and guidelines; I encourage you to reach out to them as well if you aren't sure about anything.

Thanks, and happy mapping!
between2burgs (2026-04-15 01:26:47+00:00): Hey CAM-Gerlach,

I think this was a mistake on my part - I’m a local bike advocate based in Blacksburg and my experience with open streets maps is new.

I only wanted to start marking some local routes that I use by bike, not adjust any nodes around Progress St.

If you’re able to revert this change, please do. Or if there’s something I need to accomplish, please let me know!

Thanks
CAM-Gerlach (2026-04-15 04:07:58+00:00): Hey B2B, thanks for the followup (and cool name, BTW)!

As a former Blacksburg resident (VT alumnus) myself for whom my bike was my primary means of transportation around town and campus (I didn't own a car till years later), I appreciate the enthusiasm!

Thanks for the explanation--I was rather perplexed when reading this changeset's comment, as while accidental node drags are not uncommon especially by newer mappers, I didn't see any actual intentional changes in the changeset--the node drag was the only OSM change here.

Based what I'm able to gather from you and other "Bike Streets" mappers with similarly puzzling changeset comments, I'm inferring that the actual intentional changes you are making to establish these routes you're referring to are only being reflected in Bike Streets' own proprietary data via its internal editor, with only certain relevant bits and pieces being applied upstream to the OSM data. Therefore, while the changeset comment makes sense in the context of the change you are making to that proprietary dataset, it reads as rather confusing to other mappers in the context of just the open OSM data actually being contributed back. At least IMO I don't think this overall approach is _inherently_ flawed, but ISTM that _something_ should be done to avoid this confusion and clarify the situation, not 100% sure what yet.

In any case, I went ahead and executed the revert of the node drag in changeset 181347840 https://osm.org/changeset/181347840 ; it should presumably leave whatever intentional changes you made in Bike Streets' proprietary data intact. It's all good now as far as this particular case is concerned, but hopefully one of us can follow up with regards to the broader issue to help reduce future mapper confusion in these sorts of situations. Thanks!
ColbyTheWorldTraveler (2026-04-20 16:44:36+00:00): I think Cafe is a good tag for it. I'll have to do some digging and figure out if Gelato can be counted as "Ice Cream". Looks good!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181254325
NeisBot (2026-04-13 02:15:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1362769103 v9 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1362741291 v12 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/616095020 v6
https://osm.org/node/10831634733 v3
https://osm.org/node/10776982797 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181254451
baptistemm (2026-04-13 06:27:44+00:00): Bonjour, 

Quel est l'intêrét d'un tel point, de mon expérience, on ne doit pas ajouter d'élément qui si temporaires.

Bonne journée
Wildsharky (2026-04-15 08:36:30+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181315564
NeisBot (2026-04-13 02:16:18+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, EvaMPR.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added buildings"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment