piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
StC (2025-06-23 19:33:06+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a créé de la confusion dans la Voie d'Arles, en ajoutant des chemins dans la relation principale plutôt que dans les étapes concernées, et en ne supprimant pas les chemins précédents. On a donc deux problèmes : des trajets "concurrents", et une structure de relation qui fait planter les applications. Pouvez-vous regarder ça svp ?
ivanbranco (2025-05-13 08:20:34+00:00): Ciao, hai aggiunto layer=1 a Cavo Torre, ora passa allo stesso layer dei ponti, mi sembra strano: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/588784535
APneunzehn74 (2025-08-26 16:39:13+00:00): Hallo, an dieser Mitfahrbank hast du das dokumentierte highway=hitchhiking entfernt. Was war der Grund dafür?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dhitchhiking
Grüße APneunzehn74
sykul (2025-05-13 14:04:37+00:00): Bonjour. Quel est l'intérêt d'ajouter les paramètres url ? C'est trompeur car les personnes qui cliquent sur le lien dans OSM ne viendront pas de Google.
sykul (2025-05-13 14:04:56+00:00): Je vais le modifier.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-05-13 14:07:39+00:00): Bonjour,

En effet vous avez raison, nous allons corriger cette erreur .
Toutes nos excuses

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
sykul (2025-05-13 14:09:09+00:00): Merci beaucoup. C'est bon, je l'ai déjà modifié. Bonne journée.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-05-13 14:11:34+00:00): Merci de votre alerte, visiblement tout le réseau Delko est impacté par une erreur de notre client.
On va faire une correction globale

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
APneunzehn74 (2025-08-26 16:42:12+00:00): Hallo, auch hier wurde das highway=hitchhiking entfernt, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dhitchhiking
Grüße APneunzehn74
YomanNH (2025-05-13 13:14:22+00:00): Hej,
lepiej byłoby chodnik zmienić na highway=construction + construction=footway, zamiast go całkowicie usuwać :)
grzegorz75jan (2025-05-13 15:17:24+00:00): Liczą się intencje. Nie ma to nie ma.
A poważnie to faktycznie użyć construction.

Uczy się tzn. mam nadzieję, że przynajmniej zacznie.
rhhs (2025-05-13 09:05:46+00:00): Is this a new shop where there was no shop mapped before, or is this replacing a shop which was mapped already? If replacing an existing shop, please do not create a new node, but edit the node of the previous shop.
I already edited format mistakes in your entry: opening hours is without spaces before and after - and date ranges should be separated by ; (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Multiple_days_and_multiple_time_periods ), street names should be copied from the street way (usually a dropdown menu shows the names of the nearby streets) and phone numbers should start with +359
seopinnacleagency (2025-05-14 10:31:49+00:00): Thank you for the edits. Thеre was no shop mapped before.
rhhs (2025-05-14 14:37:25+00:00): Thank you for replying! I hope you and your colleagues will learn from the corrections I made. I find it frustrating that I (an unpaid volunteer) has to correct the mistakes made by a commercial agency.
I went to check at the shop, and found it has replaced a flower shop at a slightly different location than the new node you created (i.e. it was in the wrong place). I copied the tags to the node of the flower shop and deleted the new node you made.
rhhs (2025-05-14 15:52:01+00:00): I also noticed that for the opening hours, my editor gave an error message "unexpected character". I think in the tag value, there was Мo-Fr instead of Mo-Fr (Cyrillic М instead of Latin M)... I corrected it.
user_5359 (2025-05-14 17:51:00+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/2510003718. What is the mean of the tag
保护级别 = 国家级
?
gscscnd (2025-05-13 19:57:38+00:00): Masz jakiś automat? Identyczne modyfikacje wielu obiektów lepiej grupować w jednym zestawie zmian.
Frans S (2025-05-13 09:11:57+00:00): Issues found on your mappings
A: Inaccurate mapping.
C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
D: Connecting Nodes to other features.
E: Buildings not squared.
G: Included the shadow of the building.
H: Included a yard of clearing.
High building(s) incorrect mapped. See par 20 chapter About Buildings
Frans S (2025-05-13 09:12:25+00:00): Please improve incorrect mappings and place them on their footprint.
Check that walled courtyards or walled plots are not mapped as a building.

About mapping of high buildings.  They show a large shadow.
Difficult area to map.
Big building blocks with several stories and courtyards

Check here how high buildings ought to be mapped.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z7uDwYm4oNmlexHIhJxGCjPpNhCQAgRia5aEJr_4MwM/edit?usp=sharing

Many tall buildings have a small building, a superstructure, lift building or something similar on the roof. They give a shadow as well, so do not map them as a separate building, just map the roof lines of the complete building, and move the whole to the footprint. You can often see it in the shadow.

Best regards and keep mapping
rohieb (2025-05-13 17:21:51+00:00): Danke! Ist das maxspeed=30 hier aus Versehen verloren gegangen? Das zone:maxspeed=30 ist noch da und soll offenbar zusätzlich zu maxspeed=* gesetzt werden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:zone:maxspeed
rohieb (2025-05-13 17:23:47+00:00): Huch. Ich habe erst die englische Version der Seite verlinken wollen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:zone:maxspeed
Aber ich merke grad, dass meine Behauptung in der deutschen Version der Seite gar nicht drin steht.
RainerBielefeld (2025-05-13 17:35:00+00:00): maxspeed=30 tatsächlich versehentlich gelöscht, dachte erst ich hätte das eingetragen UND "Doppelt gemoppelt wg Zone 30". Sah aber später, dass Zone + Höchstgeschwindigkeit durchaus üblich ist. Setzt Du's wieder 'rein?
rohieb (2025-05-13 17:46:09+00:00): Alles klar, hab ich gerade wieder hinzugefügt.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-26 07:58:16+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173782436
Taya_S (2025-05-13 08:31:15+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166189618
ivanbranco (2025-05-13 09:03:00+00:00): Ciao Valery,

come mai tutte queste cancellazioni? Cosa significano quegli hashtags? Le attività di mapping coordinate dovrebbero essere documentate: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Guidelines
francians (2025-05-13 09:23:21+00:00): Ciao,

Sull'ospedale di Cuneo hai messo layer=-1 puoi chiarire??
ivanbranco (2025-05-13 10:12:09+00:00): A Novara hai cancellato edifici, alberi, prati, parcheggi per le bici, footway e altro ancora. Purtroppo mi trovo costretto ad annullare questo changeset in quanto peggiorativo dei dati del database.
Valery Visciglia Aleinik 244854 (2025-05-14 06:52:44+00:00): Ciao. Mi dispiace, l’avevo fatto solo provvisoriamente e gli avrei rimessi com’erano. Con tutte quelle informazioni sui prati, vari cassonetti e così mi trovavo in difficoltà nel mappare gli edifici. Sono nuovo in questo programma e lo faccio come tirocinio all’università. 
Gli hashtag sono connessi al progetto di tirocinio. 
Grazie per avermelo fatto presente.
Valery Visciglia Aleinik 244854 (2025-05-14 06:53:51+00:00): Non mi era stato detto che i dati già presenti non si possono modificare. Mi dispiace, ancora sono poco esperto e sbaglio parecchio.
ivanbranco (2025-05-14 08:21:08+00:00): Si possono modificare i dati già esistenti. Quello che non si può fare è eliminare dati esistenti che esistono realmente (come prati, cassonetti ecc.). Oppure cancellarli e ridisegnarli in quanto si perde la storia dell'elemento.
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2025-05-13 08:38:44+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for your changes!

In the future, consider sending two groups of changes: one for the UK, and the other for the changes in Montenegro. This really helps reviewing changesets. Thanks in advance!

For more information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
kravietz (2025-05-13 10:06:51+00:00): Will do, these UK ones were uploaded in this bath only because I forgot to upload them before.
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2025-05-13 10:49:34+00:00): No worries ☺

Have a nice day!
pitfire (2025-05-13 09:46:51+00:00): Hallo OSMeteor,
Tipp.
Danke für Deine Nachträge. Es währe hilfreich, wenn Du gleichzeitig der beleuchteten Strasse die Zusatzinfo "DE:Key:lit" zufügen würdest.
VG pitfire
Goffredo (2025-05-13 10:31:57+00:00): Ciao Pete27, scusa se rompo le scatole con questo commento.
Usare le foto Bing come sfondo va bene ma a patto che vengano allineate manualmente a fonti meglio georeferenziate come le ortofoto PCN.
Le Bing non sono ben referenziate e ricalcare da esse senza riallinearle può introdurre errori.
Ad esempio, il Parcheggio Italia risulta fuori posizione sulle Bing non riallineate, ma è corretto se allinei le Bing alle PCN.

Ciao e buon mapping
EfreetSK (2025-07-09 19:42:10+00:00): "Ľudovítov prameň"? Máme na to nejaký zdroj? Neviem ako sa dá pozrieť mapycz reporty a čo bolo ich obsahom.

Zaujímam sa preto, lebo sa doslova roky snažím zistiť meno tohoto prameňa a neúspešne. Tak som na jednej strane nadšený že sa to zistilo, na druhej strane skeptický že odkiaľ to je.

Mama vravela, že to ľudia volali "kadlubek"
Filip009CZ (2025-07-10 18:57:49+00:00): Hľadal som, pátral som, ale nenašiel som bohužiaľ tú fotografiu, na ktorej sa daný názov nachádzal. Spomínam si na nejakú náučnú tabuľu s pomenovanými/premenovanými niektorými prameňmi. (Nie som si istý, či to bolo v tejto oblasti, ale myslím, že hej)
EfreetSK (2025-07-11 19:31:50+00:00): Tak som sa pustil do pátrania po názve tohoto prameňa keďže som to aj tak chcel urobiť už dávno a táto zmena ma k tomu dokopala.
Pýtal som sa vo Facebookovej skupine "Bardejov kedysi a dnes" ktorá je veľmi aktívna a venuje sa histórii Bardejova a jeho okolia. Ale prekvapivo nikto presne nevedel, ako sa ten prameň volá, ľudia si pamätali vlastne to čo som si pamätal ja - že to je zrejme tiež "Ľudový prameň" a že tam vyviera asi hlavný prameň, to bol zhruba konsenzus.
Nakoniec to rozlúskla až pani ktorá sa venuje histórii Bardejovských kúpeľov ktorá vytiahla fotku z Rakúsko-Uhorska z Maďarského národného múzea ktorá potvrdila, že ten prameň sa naozaj volá "Ľudový prameň" (no nevedela povedať, aký prameň tam vyviera). Rovnako si to pamätajú aj starý kúpeľčania.
Odkiaľ sa vzal "Ľudovítov prameň" to neviem, pokiaľ viem tak taký prameň ani v Bardejovských kúpeľoch nie je. Aj názov je zvláštny, pramene majú väčšinou mená ako Anna, Klára, Alexander, ... teda to by skôr sedel názov "Ľudovít". No možno to je skomolenina názvu "Ľudový prameň" -> "Ľudovítov prameň".
Premenoval by som to teda "Ľudový prameň". No keďže hneď vedľa sa nachádza tak isto "Ľudový prameň" a ten je oveľa známejší, možno by bolo lepšie zvoliť niečo ako "Pôvodný ľudový prameň" alebo "Starý ľudový prameň"

Linky (aj keď skupina je myslím privátna):
Moja pôvodná otázka: https://www.facebook.com/groups/bjkedysiadnes/permalink/3997945723780610/

Odpoveď od pani s historickou fotografiou: https://www.facebook.com/groups/bjkedysiadnes/permalink/3999087786999737/

PS: Ešte napíšem na Bardejovské kúpele a.s. či o tom niečo nevedia, ktovie, možno to fakt začali premenovávať
Filip009CZ (2025-07-11 20:03:57+00:00): Ešte by som skúsil prieskum na mieste, či tam fakt nie je v okolí nejaká nová náučná tabuľa.
EfreetSK (2025-07-16 10:55:11+00:00): Tak som dostal odpoveď od Bardejovských kúpeľov:

"Pekný deň, poslala som Váš dotaz na technickú prevádzku, ktorej je súčasťou aj balneológ a ak bude mať odpoveď,  dám Vám vedieť."

"Odpoveď som dostala takú, že tie pramene sa určite nepremenovali a prameň Ľudovít v našich kúpeľoch nemáme. Na google mapách nie sú mená prameňov ani na ZBGISe, nevieme teda z akých máp je tá informácia. Na google mapách je tam poznámka Ľudový prameň, takto sa označuje celý veľký altánok, kde je prameň Hlavný a Lekársky. No a to kamenné naberacie miesto  má taktiež Hlavný prameň."

Bohužiaľ to neviem overiť na mieste v dohľadnej dobe, možno do konca roka ešte budem v Bardejovských Kúpeľoch ake zaručiť to neviem. 

No ja by som to teda premenoval keďže máme oficiálne od Bardejovských Kúpeľov že prameň Ľudovít neexistuje. Správne meno by teda malo byť "Hlavný prameň" keďže ten bod pojednáva konkrétne o prameni a nie o tom naberacom mieste (ktoré by sa dalo nazvať "Pôvodný ľudový prameň"). Možno ako alternatívny názov by sa dalo dať "Pôvodný ľudový prameň" a ako ľudový názov "Kadlubek" keďže veľa Bardejovčanov ho pozná pod týmto menom
Filip009CZ (2025-07-16 12:26:11+00:00): Okej, súhlasím s premenovaním. Nechávam to na teba, keďže si tomu venoval veľa času. Vďaka :)
Mannivu (2025-05-13 15:18:03+00:00): Sarebbe meglio nel commento al gruppo di modifiche specificare cosa si è fatto n po' più nel dettaglio, perché scrivere "miglioramento geometria stradale" quando si sono anche aggiunte strade è fuorviante
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166190251
user_5359 (2025-05-13 08:49:29+00:00): Sorry, wrong comment. Update opening_hours key and value
Frans S (2025-05-13 09:48:17+00:00): Hello.  I had to adjust a lot of buildings.
Check this webpage.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166192154
My comment on your other changesets are valid here as well.
Best regards and keep mapping
maro21 (2025-05-18 14:01:52+00:00): Nie łączymy obiektów fizycznych z niefizycznymi (granice). Lepiej w ogóle odznaczyć warstwy Granice i Obiekty dystrybucji prądu elektrycznego oraz inne, których się nie edytuje w danym czasie.
Frans S (2025-05-13 09:18:43+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
This task has the same issues as previous mapped tasks
Best regards
aceman444 (2025-05-16 08:57:00+00:00): Thanks, you are right. But the wiki links are useful, maybe they would be better in 'brand', or 'network' tags?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-16 14:20:45+00:00): maybe? does not fit ideally but sort of fits

maybe link to wikipedia can be also added in url key?
archie (2025-05-13 10:43:52+00:00): Hej du har några gånger satt foot=no här på vägarna. Och, ja, det är olämpligt att gå till foots där (observera dock att till vägen hör även vägrenen (shoulder)!). Men det finns inget skyltat förbud här mot gångtrafiken; så därför bör det inte taggas foot=no här. 

Titta på taggarna för den här vägen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231211101). Taggat med foot=no eftersom det finns ett skyltat förbud mot gångtrafik här. 

Om vi alla mappare skulle efter eget skön (bedömning) välja vilka vägar/gator som är olämpliga att ha gångtrafik på och tagga foot=no skulle det bli kaotiskt. Mappare Pelle tycker vägen skall taggas med foot=no, medan mapparen Lasse inte håller med. Det är därför det finns regeln i osm att saker och ting skall vara verifierbara. Och ett gångförbud kan inte verifieras på de ställen som du har taggat foot=no. Sedan är det en helt annan femma vad gäller lämpligheten. 

Eller ställ saken på sin spets. Tänk dig att polisen haffar någon som går på den gata som du taggade. Personen ifråga kommer i så fall inte att bötfällas för brott mot ej tillåten gångtrafik (vilket han/hon kommer att bli vid gångtrafik på väg 155 på Öckerö).
ziomio (2025-05-13 09:23:01+00:00): https://www.gazzettadiparma.it/gazzareporter/2025/05/13/gallery/san-lazzaro-est-nuova-rotonda-tra-via-de-chirico-e-via-savinio-e-nuova-strada-di-collegamento-con-via-ximenes-e-strada-budellungo-foto-864535/
Zrop (2025-05-13 10:54:25+00:00): Hallo stadt-koeln-umac,
wurde die Promenade wirklich umbenannt ? Siehe

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2220947914932911&focus=photo&lat=50.9254523&lng=6.967115&z=17&x=0.1877275717104928&y=0.11605890874274957&zoom=1.8217821782178218

Gruß
Zrop
stadt-koeln-umac (2025-05-13 11:12:20+00:00): Hallo Zrop,
die Promenade wurde nicht umbenannt.
Laut Straßenbenennungsakte ist es die Laura-Oelbermann-Promenade.
stadt-koeln-umac (2025-05-13 11:13:05+00:00): Ich werde das Straßenschild, aber der zuständigen Stelle zu kommen lassen!
Zrop (2025-05-13 11:26:51+00:00): Hallo stadt-koeln-umac,
was in der Straßenbenennungsakte (ich vermute mal Du meinst ALKIS) steht ist für OSM nicht relevant, auch in ALKIS können sich Fehler einschleichen. Für OSM ist ausschlaggebend was vor Ort ausgeschildert ist, und das ist hier "Laura-von-Oelbermann-Promenade", was auch Sinn macht, denn die Namensgeberin hieß ja Laura-von-Oelbermann.
Änderst Du das bitte wieder, Danke.
stadt-koeln-umac (2025-05-13 11:30:00+00:00): Ich werde es klären!
Gruß
stadt-koeln-tillmann (2025-05-14 04:36:02+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name
gibt zwar an, dass der "der primäre Name der offensichtlichste Name eines Merkmals ist". Es steht dort aber auch: "Einige häufige Fälle, in denen die On-the-Ground-Regel nicht streng angewendet werden muss: (...) Wenn ein Schild offensichtlich fehlerhaft ist, dann verwende eine andere Quelle für den name=*. not:name=* kann verwendet werden, um das falsche Schild zu dokumentieren und den Fehler für zukünftige Mapper zu dokumentieren." Da wir mit der zuständigen Stelle hier in der Verwaltung festgestellt haben, dass die Beschilderung falsch ist und ausgetauscht werden soll, würde ich mich auf diese Regelung berufen wollen und die dort angegebene Vorgehensweise vorschlagen.
Robert Whittaker (2025-05-20 12:51:52+00:00): Hi,

You added indoor=yes to the AED at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8788255692 in this changeset.

Could you check if this was what you intended? The node contains the location description "On exterior wall of building..." which would suggest it's not indoors (or wasn't at the time it was mapped). If it is now indoors, then the description should be updated too.

Many thanks.
Alexis Giraud-Courtney (2025-05-13 10:55:07+00:00): Please do not revert this change I will fix the wikivoyage tag and delete it
Leo Slager (2025-05-13 10:40:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Tim Kiemkr8 (2025-05-13 10:53:45+00:00): Bedankt Leo!
Matt McCutchen (2025-05-18 15:55:15+00:00): Are you sure that the time-conditional restriction is correct for the service road?  I visited this location on January 15, 2025 and there was an unconditional "right turn only" restriction from the service road, like the one in this Mapillary image: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=38.9026429&lng=-77.0382639&z=19.243399386914778&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&pKey=578009907499172&focus=photo&x=0.4265917848549031&y=0.3344586912640908&zoom=0.665217391304348 .  (That's even stricter than the unconditional "no left turn" that OSM had before this changeset.)  I suspect the time-conditional "no left turn" is intended for the main road, and that restriction is already mapped (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6528323).

If you could recheck your imagery, that would probably be the quickest way to resolve this.  Otherwise, I'll resurvey the restriction if and when I have an opportunity to visit the location again.  Thanks!
ihorkovtun_lyft (2025-05-21 08:55:06+00:00): Hello, Matt McCutchen!

My name is Ihor, and I am part of the OSM Mapping team at Lyft. Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention. Upon reviewing our images, I found that you were correct. I mistakenly applied the time-based restriction from the main road to the nearby channel road. Reverted to the previous version of the restriction in this changeset ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6528326/history ). I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.

Best regards, Ihor
Lokai (2025-05-13 12:49:50+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen bei OSM.

Der Feldweg verläuft mal innerhalb mal außerhalb von residential.
Gemeinsame Knoten von highway und Flächen wie hier bitte vermeiden.

Gruß

L.
Zatigem (2025-05-14 16:42:29+00:00): Bonjour Charles,

J'avais bien dit que je voulais qu'on laisse en l'état (bicycle ou foot ne devrait pas être designated) mais je ne ferai plus de modification car on part dans une "guerre" un peu. Je laisse un tiers revoir cela ^^.

Bonne soirée
Carto'Cité (2025-05-17 06:49:30+00:00): Pardon, les modifications étaient faites et le changeset prêt à envoyer. Mais il est justement dans sa description originale, celle que le contributeur josmougn avait réalisée. Tu peux le repasser en footway si tu le souhaites mais il faudrait justement en discuter avec lui.
Charles
impiaaa (2025-05-13 16:59:18+00:00): Thank you for your contribution! Please try to remember to save your changes in one area before moving to another, otherwise it makes it hard to review changes.
Bauer33333 (2025-05-15 19:41:38+00:00): Please also be aware that bing is not allowing their actual map to be used for OSM mapping, only the aerials and street level images can be used.
julcnx (2025-05-15 02:47:01+00:00): Thanks! I wasn't aware of such documented lifecycle highway key, I will use it for now with fixme=survey.
Dani CS (2025-05-16 09:26:40+00:00): Bonjour ! Il est souvent approprié d'ajouter access=private pour les piscines qui sont clairement privatives.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166193126
ivanbranco (2025-05-13 10:26:48+00:00): Ciao Enrico,

in Italia per convenzione mappiamo i civici sugli ingressi, non sugli edifici, trovi maggiori informazioni qua: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses#Regole_specifiche_per_l'Italia

Inoltre, come ho già scritto alla tua collega, le attività organizzate hanno delle linee guida da seguire, puoi riferirlo al supervisore di questo progetto? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Guidelines

grazie e buon mapping
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-30 05:14:52+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166952098
skadi (2025-05-16 07:56:51+00:00): друг, пожалуйста, сходи на местность и оставь в покое эту дорогу. Это дорога. А под мостом ливневка и второй небольшой  мостик для обслуживания защитных сооружений реки чебоксарки.
eggie (2025-05-13 15:17:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Hufkratzer (2025-05-13 18:32:05+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1386085603 is not a horse riding cemtre (leisure?horse_riding), it is a (large) horse riding arena. In OSM these riding arenas are usually tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385731954. See also OSM wiki.
Manudu35 (2025-05-19 13:30:30+00:00): Hi Hufkratzer.
Thank you for these informations.
It's the first time i taggued this kind of pitch.
I just made the modification.
Hufkratzer (2025-05-19 18:42:22+00:00): Thanks.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-30 05:16:49+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166952137
Jorieke V (2025-05-13 10:23:15+00:00): I removed as well the clinic tag, because this is not a location where patients are welcomed. This is only an office.
f_husni (2025-07-17 07:36:26+00:00): Hallo mas. kalau mau pasang batas admin tolong jangan digabung dengan jalan. dan juga perhatikan efek dari editannya. saya lihat banyak jalan yang terputus akibat dari editan mas
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-30 06:03:02+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166953369
catgirlseraid (2025-05-13 10:36:23+00:00): i forgot about the way in south korea sorryyyy
Kovoschiz (2025-05-13 10:38:57+00:00): You haven't added back `electricity=solar` , meaning this is a loss of info eg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4131212886/history
Kovoschiz (2025-05-13 10:41:15+00:00): Wrong fixing for validator which included `building=` and other areas  (including `=clinic` ) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152309258
catgirlseraid (2025-05-13 10:47:01+00:00): please see changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166195665 where electricity=solar was added as was implied via previously incorrectly used tags