piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisReview (2025-08-02 16:24:05+00:00): @ HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi

Thank you very much for the detailed response and also your review. I had already looked into this in detail as well. From my side, a complete revert of this and possibly the other changesets is appropriate. What do you think?

Best regards, Pascal
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-08-02 16:55:11+00:00): @NeisReview. The user(Tbydsucqııyu Ctdeq) also cited "Apple maps" as the source of the data. 

I've checked the other changesets. They can be reverted too. I agree with you.

This one is an exception:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169768344
This changeset looks like real. He changed the direction of a road. 
I checked on the municipality's website(kutahya.bel.tr). This road (way/614455326) is indeed in that direction. ( Source: https://www.kutahya.bel.tr/haber.asp?id=3338 )

Best regards.
Taya_S (2025-08-13 10:17:17+00:00): Reverted edits containing vandalism/data from incompatible sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170381260
NeisReview (2025-07-31 15:15:56+00:00): Hi,
Would it make sense to set lanes=0 in this context?

Thanks!
NeisBot (2025-07-31 12:48:31+00:00): Hello Tbydsucqııyu Ctdeq, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1418917977

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=169768688
NeisReview (2025-08-01 06:29:15+00:00): Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were by mistake.
NeisRevert (2025-08-01 06:29:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/169799982
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove misplaced data
Jrachi (2025-08-19 07:36:15+00:00): Ciao.
Benvenuto nella mappa più bella del mondo. Ma anche quella che ha regole travisate e scombinate di continuo...
Vedo che gai aggiunto i valori di default su alcune highway.
Se non sai cos'è un default, ti invito a leggere le pagine wiki highway, path, track, access, ecc.
In breve si mette esplicitamente un valore di access solo quando è contrario al default.
Per l'Italia il default è guidato dal codice della strada, e può essere diverso, ma solo più restrittivo, per leggi regionale.
Ad esempio sulle autostrade i pedoni non possono circolare: il default è foot=no, ma non si mette perché implicito nel tag highway=trunk.
Altro esempio:
Su highway=path la legge regionale prevede il transito a pedoni, cavalli e biciclette e regolamenta strettamente il transito ai mezzi motorizzati, in pratica è inutile (anche se non sbagliato) aggiungere:
foot=yes
horse=yes
bycicle=yes
ecc. ecc.
È solo uno spregio all'uso dello spazio nel database (OSM è un database, non una mappa!)
Infine, come corollario, aggiungo che le condizione di access=no, ovvero foot=no, bycicle=no, ecc. ecc.
Si applicano solo se è presente una specifica cartellonistica messa dall'amministrazione locale.
Spesso trovo horse=no (e altre invenzioni simili) su sentieri di alta montagna messe da un user che pensa che indicando così eviterà che qualcuno possa andarci facendosi male!!!!!

Ivo
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-23 06:21:05+00:00): DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173657043
Andrea Alessioli (2025-07-31 13:12:07+00:00): Footways shouldn't be areas so I think pedestrian is the most appropriate tag (even after checking parageph 3 of the wiki for Tag:highway=pedestrian)
Mannivu (2025-07-31 13:15:30+00:00): In reality there is no strict ban on using the footway and area together https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway#Areas
Andrea Alessioli (2025-07-31 13:29:06+00:00): I still think using pedestrian would be more appropriate since it's fairly wide and used for recreation.
I'm new to this, is there a designated place for getting a third opinion?
Mannivu (2025-07-31 13:31:05+00:00): Sure, there's already a fairly long discussion on the forum
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/clarification-of-footway-area-mapping/130974/5
Andrea Alessioli (2025-07-31 14:38:54+00:00): I see what they're getting at, but I think i'm going to stick with area:footway=pedestrian until iD stops nagging about footway areas
Mannivu (2025-07-31 15:27:47+00:00): ID alerts are suggestions (not always approved by OSM community, by the way) they're not mandatory to be fixed.
AndreiFurs (2025-08-01 14:40:34+00:00): Also, fixed the geometry of buildings according to Bing Maps Aerial #mapbox_missing_roads
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169769303
MatthieuMartin (2026-05-25 08:14:08+00:00): Bonjour Julien Mairie de Lacaune,

Dans OSM, les abréviations doivent être évitées. 
Voir : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Names#Abr%C3%A9viation_(%C3%A0_ne_pas_faire)

Bonne carto!

Suite modif : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1112787664/history/2
Greg91 (2025-10-19 11:22:48+00:00): Hi!
I spotted you created an avalanche of objects - jets, which are technical elements of a fountain (Vesiurut).

I am convinces this is against OSM best practice of "one feature - one element"; this level of detailing, I believe, is not useful, not for OSM data consumers current or potential as it stretches the notion of micro-mapping to the level of nano-mapping=)

Please, revert this changes and leave just one feature, one fountain.
foreigner037 (2025-08-16 10:32:53+00:00): Hi,

when you use highway=construction, please also specify construction=*. In this case construction=primary.
Jose Luis Infante (2025-08-18 23:47:48+00:00): Hola,
gràcies per la teva contribució. És millor no esborrar el local i dexar-lo buit amb shop=vacant. Així es conserva l'històric del local. Es podria esborrar si el local desapareix, com p.e. desapareix l'edifici o es converteix el local comercial en un pis.
Si em pots confirmar si el local existeix i es buit recupero l'històric.
Salutacions!
Stone_X (2025-07-31 18:11:41+00:00): Wyrysowany obrys budynku jest nieaktualny. Obrys wskazuje na budynek, którego już nie ma (został wyburzony w grudniu 2024r). Kształt nowego budynku (już budowanego) będzie wyglądał zupełnie inaczej:
https://postimg.cc/2LfZqk0r
déni (2025-12-10 20:31:29+00:00): Bonjour, le noeud "La Poste" est un arrêt de bus qui était au bon endroit (là où se situait l'ancien bureau de Poste). L'agence postale communale (où a été deplacé ce noeud) existait déjà.
AngocA (2025-11-28 16:26:15+00:00): Hola Sofia

Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte  de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar?
Gracias por la info.

Andrés G.
AngocA (2025-11-28 16:26:09+00:00): Hola 

Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte  de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar?
Gracias por la info.

Andrés G.
AngocA (2025-11-28 16:26:29+00:00): Hola salitoo

Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte  de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar?
Gracias por la info.

Andrés G.
AngocA (2025-11-28 16:27:01+00:00): Hola Mariana

Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte  de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar?
Gracias por la info.

Andrés G.
AngocA (2025-11-28 16:26:41+00:00): Hola Eva

Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte  de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar?
Gracias por la info.

Andrés G.
AngocA (2025-11-28 16:27:11+00:00): Hola Ospinat

Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte  de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar?
Gracias por la info.

Andrés G.
AngocA (2025-11-28 16:26:56+00:00): Hola Sofi

Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte  de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar?
Gracias por la info.

Andrés G.
AngocA (2025-11-28 16:26:49+00:00): Hola Karen

Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte  de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar?
Gracias por la info.

Andrés G.
AngocA (2025-11-28 16:27:18+00:00): Hola Sara

Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte  de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar?
Gracias por la info.

Andrés G.
AngocA (2025-11-28 16:27:26+00:00): Hola Leslie

Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte  de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar?
Gracias por la info.

Andrés G.
AngocA (2025-11-28 16:27:35+00:00): Hola Estefany

Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte  de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar?
Gracias por la info.

Andrés G.
AngocA (2025-11-28 16:29:04+00:00): Hola Mariana

Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte  de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar?
Gracias por la info.

Andrés G.
AngocA (2025-11-28 16:29:14+00:00): Hola Sthefanya

Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte  de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar?
Gracias por la info.

Andrés G.
AngocA (2025-11-28 16:29:24+00:00): Hola Mafe

Qué bueno que hayas comenzado a mapear en OpenStreetMap. Este mapeo de árboles en Mellín hace parte  de una activdiad organizada? por una universidad, colegio o similar?
Gracias por la info.

Andrés G.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-31 14:01:25+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286059491

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
olo81 (2025-08-02 19:32:33+00:00): Dlaczego na tej drodze https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173525839/history skasowałeś cycleway=opposite ?
olo81 (2025-08-02 19:34:37+00:00): i nie tylko tej drodze
olo81 (2025-08-02 19:41:59+00:00): A już widzę, zmienili tagowanie
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Deprecate_cycleway=opposite_family
C2oc4 (2025-08-03 07:14:21+00:00): Cześć. Dokonywałem aktualizacji znaczników.
5m4u9 (2025-08-01 04:17:34+00:00): Hi, I will revert this changeset because the name of park is "Parque Benito Juarez" not just "Rotonda". Local people call this road intersection "Rotonda América y Uyuni". And the bust of the hero is a memorial, not just an artwork.
BigKev97 (2025-10-06 15:47:09+00:00): "Parque Benito Juárez" with "á" please.
NeisBot (2025-07-31 14:17:33+00:00): Hi taccvets, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added contact information and opening hours to a node."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
Dimitar155 (2025-07-31 20:20:04+00:00): Здравейте Мика,

Магазините, които сте добавили с тази и предните две промени, са отбелязани върху сградите. Не е необходимо да се дублират. Не виждам да имат и нова информация (например ново работно време) поради което ги премахвам.

Ако имате някакви въпроси, оставам на разположение.

Поздрави,
Митко

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169789267
hatul (2025-08-04 10:51:45+00:00): שלום רובי ותודה על העזרה.
המפה לא מיועדת לסתם מקומות. צריך לתייג את המקומות בהתאם ואם הם לא חשובים אז לא למפות.
אני נאלץ למחוק.
SekeRob (2025-08-12 05:52:54+00:00): Hi,

You added a footway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418937946 which was made part of the BI-6 route but you did not specify bicycle=yes or bicycle=dismount. For the tunnel, does that have to be =yes or dismount? What is the maxheight/width for that tunnel? Is it save to cycle through or is walking (dismount) recommended)?

For now I've added bicycle=yes to the new footway piece north of the road as this got flagged by Quality Control.

Let me know.
Buongiorno.
aaei924 (2025-08-03 00:25:46+00:00): 안녕하세요, 편집사항에 의문점이 있어 댓글을 남깁니다.
새만금 남북도로, 동서도로는 도로 구조상 고속화도로로 보이는데, trunk 태그를 제거하신 이유가 있나요?
yvelkram (2025-08-03 14:14:45+00:00): > 도로 구조상으로는 고속화도로가 맞습니다만, 자동차 전용도로 도로표지가 설치 되어있지 않아서 일반 보행자도 다닐 수 있습니다. 타 시도 사례를 참고하면, 고속화도로라고는 보기 어렵다고 생각됩니다.

> 남북도로는 어느 곳에서도 자동차전용도로 표지가 설치되어 있지 않습니다.
동서도로는 신시도쪽 접근로에 전용도로 표지가 있는걸 확인했으나 반대쪽 입구는 설치하지 않아 혼동이 있습니다. 
> 결론적으로 자동차전용도로에 함께 설치해야 하는 보행금지 표지, "자동차전용도로 통행금지 및 제한" 표지가 미식별되어 전용도로가 아니라고 판단하였습니다.
> 동서도로는 노면표시상, 최저속도제한 표지로 보아 자동차전용도로로 설계한 것으로 보이지만, 운영상으로는 제한이 없는 일반 도로입니다. 새만금 수목원 북측을 보시면 흔적이 있습니다. 어떠한 이유에선가 방침이 바뀐 것으로 생각됩니다.
yvelkram (2025-08-03 14:38:49+00:00): 동서도로, 남북도로 전략환경영향평가서 상에서는 자동차전용도로로 지정되어 있습니다. 그런데 실제 공사에서 이것이 지켜지지 않은 이유는 추가 조사가 필요해 보입니다. 설계는 자동차전용도로(trunk)가 맞지만, 어떠한 이유에선가 지정을 해제시킨것으로 보입니다.

https://www.saemangeum.go.kr/sda/brd/view.do?key=2009075579016&nttSn=413

https://www.saemangeum.go.kr/sda/brd/view.do?key=2009075579016&nttSn=2106
aaei924 (2025-08-03 19:07:05+00:00): <trunk는 자동차전용도로를 의미하지 않습니다>

highway 태그는 원래 도로의 중요도를 기준으로 매겨지는 태그이며, 한국 지역에서는 '고속화도로'에 붙이기로 합의된 상태입니다.
자동차전용도로는 대부분 고속화도로이지만, 그렇다고 모든 고속화도로가 자동차전용도로는 아니고, 도로에 대한 법적 규제사항을 말하는 것이라 고속화도로와 같다고 보지 않고 있습니다. 자동차전용도로는 `motorroad=yes` 태그를 사용하여 나타내고 있습니다.
고속화도로의 명확한 분류 기준이 없지만, 자동차전용도로냐 아니냐라는 법적 규제에 얽매이기보다 도로의 실질적 기능을 고려한 합리적 판단이 필요하다고 생각합니다. 표지판만 안 달려있지 제한속도도 80km/h로 높고, 입체교차로로 원활한 통행이 보장되고 있어 trunk 태그를 적용해도 문제가 없어 보입니다.
yvelkram (2025-08-05 06:26:09+00:00): 답변이 늦어서 죄송합니다. 설계기준이 자동차전용도로 이었던 만큼 자명한 고속화도로로 간주될 수 있기에 남북, 동서도로 모두 복구 하겠습니다. 
다만 교차로 이름, 교량 이름 등을 편집했었기 때문에 롤백이 아닌 등급 태깅만 직접 업데이트 하겠습니다.
aaei924 (2025-08-06 03:07:13+00:00): 수고가 많으십니다. 편집하신 부분 잘 보았습니다만, 몇가지 말씀드릴 점이 있습니다.

1. 길 이름이 있는 경우 다리 이름을 길의 name=*에 사용하지 않습니다. 정석적인 방법은 다리 상판을 따라 구역으로 그려 따로 표시하는 것이지만, bridge:name=* 태그를 사용하셔도 무방합니다. name 태그에는 도로의 이름을 그대로 사용합니다.

2. 띄어쓰기는 실제 표기대로(표지판 등) 하심이 좋습니다. 동서1교가 '동서 1 교'로 되어 있는 것을 보았는데, 1을 띄어 쓰신 이유가 있는가 싶습니다. 남북6교차로 역시 '남북6교차로'와 '남북 6 교차로'가 공존하는데 표지판의 표기와 동일하게 붙여서 쓴 것으로 통일함이 좋을 것 같습니다. (On the ground rule이라 하는 부분입니다)

감사합니다.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-31 14:31:09+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304979457

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
C2oc4 (2025-08-03 07:12:16+00:00): Cześć ale ja robiłem tylko aktualizacje znaczników nie dodawałem nazwy :)
olo81 (2025-08-18 21:10:09+00:00): To jest automatyczny komentarz, dodany przez bota, który sprawdza edycje. Ktoś przed tobą zrobił babola. Już poprawione.
dannmer (2025-08-07 10:59:29+00:00): A note was left inquiring if this section of road was still under construction and there were concerns whether the correct construction tags were being used. Link to note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4895095#map=15/30.41884/-84.34970
dannmer (2025-08-07 10:59:53+00:00): Full text of note:
Is osm.org/way/123622065/history still under costruction? Then it should be highway=construction if blocked or have construction=minor tag if pasable. If it is no longer under construction, then construction tag should be removed
melaniya_lyft (2025-08-08 11:46:11+00:00): Hi Dannmer,

My name is Melaniya, and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for your feedback. The road w123622065 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123622065 ) is no longer under construction, according to our ground truth imagery from April 14th at 30.41875, -84.35093 (https://drive.google.com/file/d/14S_NwAzUbOmwaiZtOXFxtRJDypPeqL29/view?usp=sharing) and telemetry data from last week (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OFWYGudQg6hN5p_7DGjcntTA2CjDPfe2/view?usp=sharing ). Since our last edits (changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163182305#map=14/30.41306/-84.34617&layers=N ), traffic has shifted from way 123622072 to way 123622065, so I updated the construction tags accordingly. However, I mistakenly forgot to remove the construction tag. I apologize for this. Thank you for pointing out this oversight. I have corrected it in the next changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170109530 .

The screenshots will be available for a month. Please let me know if you are unable to view them within this timeframe – I could generate them once again.

Best regards, 
Melaniya
dannmer (2025-08-08 12:33:37+00:00): Thanks so much for the quick response and updates!
ntzm (2025-12-20 14:10:37+00:00): Hi, I assume you added these beaches for Pokemon Go? https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/beware-of-fake-beaches-pokemon-go/112413

I have reverted all your changesets, please only add beaches where there is a beach. Please do not vandalise OSM data for a video game.

Many thanks
user_5359 (2025-08-01 17:41:04+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/9964465. What is the mean of W = yes?
mstrbrid (2025-08-01 17:49:19+00:00): It means I've got fat fingers! I've now corrected the typo. Thanks for the help
kasa kai (2025-07-31 14:47:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted and merged with correct information (where possible) under https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169774541 as it violates the naming convention in India documented at osm.wiki/India#Naming_in_different_scripts_and_languages
kasa kai (2025-07-31 14:48:48+00:00): Oops, commented under wrong changeset
DomeF (2025-08-23 20:12:12+00:00): Ciao Gaspare, ti scrivo per farti presente che la maggior parte dei percorsi qui, modificati da te, vengono visti da Osmose come percorsi con due nomi inseriti (The name tag contains two names), e così sembrerebbe infatti, per convenzione i percorsi usano il tag 'name' per il nome "ufficiale" mentre per i nomi usati dai cittadini puoi usare 'loc_name' o per vecchi nomi 'old_name'!

Buon Mapping 👋
Yog Sot (2025-07-31 20:52:21+00:00): po co podzieliłes ten las na 3 osobne sklejone kawałki?
Sylabowy Kot (2025-08-01 08:24:32+00:00): Podział miałby sens w przypadku chęci mapowania leśnictw, co pomagałoby czasami w mapingu bez GPS/GPX, a i oszczędziło by często robienia dużych bboxów, ale tutaj faktycznie brakuje widocznego sensu podziału.
felipeeugenio (2025-07-31 17:02:36+00:00): Estimado Ivo, por favor explicarnos el motivo del borrado de estas calles. Mientras tanto seguiremos reversando la eliminación.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169775168
rskedgell (2025-07-31 16:01:45+00:00): (Review requested)

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You don't actually need to add bicycle=yes to normal roads (highway types primary, secondary, tertiary, unclassified and residential), as the implicit access in OSM is to allow all transport modes. Also, bicycles and pedestrians use highways in the UK by absolute right unless explicitly prohibited (requiring traffic orders and signs).

On highway=trunk roads it shouldn't be necessary to add bicycle=yes + foot=yes, but sometimes it's needed because some broken routers assume that all trunk roads are high speed motorway-style infrastructure.

The  usual tagging for a public bridleway is horse=designated + bicycle=designated + foot=designated

For the private track, you probably want access=private. There is also ownership=private for unadopted roads which are not gated.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#United_Kingdom
HamsterFangs (2025-08-01 06:40:31+00:00): Good morning. 
Yes I'm aware that these tags are not required by OS, however they are required by wandrer.earth.
I'm in the process of getting the cycling rules changed in Wandrer so that the implicit rules are used, only excluding such ways where cycling is specifically excluded (rare, but it can happen).

You can see the wandrer rules here:  https://wandrer.earth/filters

... and my request to change them here: 
https://feedback.wandrer.earth/272

But in the meantime (as this has been ongoing for a very long time) it would really help many people to have these tags in place.
rskedgell (2025-08-01 07:30:55+00:00): Looking at wandrer.earth's rules, the highway types mentioned in my first paragraph (primary, secondary, tertiary, unclassified, residential) aren't in their list of types which require an explicit bicycle=yes|designated tag:
"If they don't have an allowed bicycle tag, ways with the following highway tags are removed: motorway, motorway_link, steps, stairs, escalator, elevator, construction, proposed, demolished, escape, bus_guideway, sidewalk, crossing, bus_stop, traffic_signals, stop, give_way, milestone, platform, speed_camera, elevator, raceway, rest_area, traffic_island, services, yes, no, drain, street_lamp, razed, corridor, busway, via_ferrata"

While it does no harm to add bicycle=yes to the primary, secondary and tertiary roads in this changeset, if wandrer.earth excluded those roads the problem may lie elsewhere.

I won't remove the tags, although there's no guarantee that someone else won't decide that they're redundant in the future.
HamsterFangs (2025-08-01 10:58:51+00:00): This is the main problem: 
These are country-specific, but generally highway=trunk, trunk_link, footway, service, and bridleway are removed (without an allowed bicycle tag).
The main effect is on bridleways, which is the focus of my endeavours. 
Thx,
Andy
rskedgell (2025-08-01 11:09:44+00:00): I also  frequently add bicycle=yes (and foot=yes where there aren't separately mapped sidewalks) on London's "trunk" roads. I'd be happier if some routers actually paid more attention to the other tags, particularly low maxspeed=* values and the absence of expressway=*/motorroad=*, but until then...

On public bridleways, please do add tags!  Generally they should have designation=public_bridleway + horse=designated + bicycle=designated + foot=designated. You're probably already aware of them, but Robert Whittaker's PRoW resources can be very helpful.
https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/
Andy Lock (2025-08-01 18:53:16+00:00): That's an amazing PRoW resource. I'll be reading it regularly.
Many thanks
rskedgell (2025-07-31 16:13:26+00:00): Thanks for adding this footpath.

If you're trying to improve the mapping of public rights of way in your area, you might find this resource useful:
https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/progress/kent/swale/swale-rural/
bxl-forever (2025-07-31 15:59:28+00:00): Hello,

I had a look at this edit.

From what I see, most houses here have two floors + one from the roof:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=794311514909889

In OSM, we tag the situation like this: building:levels=2 + roof:levels=1, and not building:levels=3.

Can I suggest you read the documentation again; maybe you did not know about this page.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:levels

Thanks for the better changeset titles, by the way!