piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-01-27 06:35:19+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13495672730 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Drukarnia 3D"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Drukarnia 3D"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-04 06:37:40+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/177755773
marc__marc (2026-01-30 07:29:22+00:00): Hello,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20139696
why subtype ?
oil_palms
coconut_palms
date_palms

Regards,
Marc
EneaSuper (2026-01-26 12:38:26+00:00): Fonti: Nota;Survey
NeisBot (2026-01-27 06:35:24+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13495676580 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Drukarnia 3D"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Drukarnia 3D"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-04 06:37:41+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/177755711
NeisBot (2026-01-27 06:35:27+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11981059574 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Storage facility"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Instalación de almacenamiento"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-04 06:37:42+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178079733
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-19 12:30:45+00:00): Reverted incorrect maxweight:hgv tag to proper maxweightrating:hgv, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178005931 #OptimoRoute
NeisBot (2026-01-27 06:32:47+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 16 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/580782988 v11 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/580782979 v3 | 8 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5558742770 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177718860
NeisReview (2026-02-04 06:37:50+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177756384
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-27 00:22:40+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13495716899

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kingkingHK (2026-01-26 14:05:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215656018 troll-tagging?
vectorial8192 (2026-01-26 15:14:51+00:00): Not troll-tagging. It do be like that. See:

https://www.td.gov.hk/en/traffic_notices/index_id_77015.html

It's not demolished, and it's not repurposed. Just abandoned, but not "abandon by damage". Not your usual kind of abandoned stuff in the usual OSM lifecycle.

My private guess is "too many hobos".
Kovoschiz (2026-01-26 17:47:41+00:00): `disused=yes` is not Troll on `highway=`
kingkingHK (2026-01-27 02:19:49+00:00): Maybe I am misunderstanding things, but I think it should be `disused:highway=` if it is disused, not only `disused=`.
vectorial8192 (2026-01-27 03:52:39+00:00): OSM wiki explains for "disused"/"abandoned" is whether the thing is "significant". Their example includes, e.g., disused/abandoned comms tower. As long as these are not demolished, these should get separate "disused"/"abandoned" tag.

Then, one may infer/feel a relevant factor is "whether I can look at it and locate it". A disused tower can still be located as a generic tower from a distance. Here is urban area, I can look at it through the glass at Exit C and locate it, and also the unassuming late-add plantations at Exit D1 and locate it. This abandoned tunnel is still gonna be here for hopefully 50 years or more.

Why didn't I do that for the rural paths? Trees grow fast, I don't think I can see those paths anymore.
Kovoschiz (2026-01-28 16:57:18+00:00): You missed the point. The difference is whether they are physical structures, or functional activities. Unused roads, buildings, towers, etc still exist. Unused services, no longer.
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-19 12:29:54+00:00): Reverted incorrect maxweight:hgv tag to proper maxweightrating:hgv, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178006454 #OptimoRoute
NeisBot (2026-01-26 13:07:22+00:00): Hi NanceeEkezie, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 97% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 71 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177719467
woodpeck (2026-01-26 13:47:47+00:00): Please also provide a human-readable description of your edit. "#hotosm-project-39838 #redcrossnigeria #IFRC #ECHO #Nigeria" is not human-readable. Explain what you did in this edit and why ("deleted buildings because ....").
NanceeEkezie (2026-01-28 11:15:38+00:00): i deleted because there where lots of mistakes either due to the earths rotation or a bad job done
mueschel (2026-02-01 15:37:53+00:00): Hi,
this node mixes several individual things on one node. It's much better to add separate nodes for each thing. 

Most of the 'railway' and 'gauge' tags can't be on a station building - this only applies to the actual rails and needs to be added there.

There's also no need to add lat/lon tags anywhere - the coordinates are already given by the location of the node.
aTarom (2026-01-26 15:47:23+00:00): Hola, retiro el tag ele=1
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13495664689/history
entiendo que debe ser height, pero el valor de 1 no me cuadra, quizás son 10 centímetros?
"height"="0.1" ?
Saludos y feliz mapeo.
NeisBot (2026-01-27 06:35:35+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13495650973 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Storage facility"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Instalación de almacenamiento"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-04 06:37:43+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/177851528
Frans S (2026-01-31 16:36:08+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
This is a building and highway project.
A number of throughgoing roads are tagged as track in the past despite the fact that they should be tagged as "tertiary".
Please check those roads as well and retag them where it is obvious.
Best regards
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-19 12:26:59+00:00): Reverted incorrect maxweight:hgv tag to proper maxweightrating:hgv, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178006525 #OptimoRoute
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-19 10:27:28+00:00): Reverted incorrect maxweight:hgv tag to proper maxweightrating:hgv, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178006592 #OptimoRoute
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-19 10:26:53+00:00): Reverted incorrect maxweight:hgv tag to proper maxweightrating:hgv, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178006656 #OptimoRoute
eggie (2026-01-26 13:53:06+00:00): Dag Sjadoo,

Tip Probeer svp het gebied van je edits klein te houden. Doe zoiets in twee aparte uploads.
Wanneer je puntdaken ziet op een schuingenomen luchtfoto hoef je geen puntdaken te tekenen. Zo ziet het gebouw er in werkelijkheid niet uit.
Dar zijn vertekeningen door de luchtfoto. 

MVG
eggie
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-19 10:26:25+00:00): Reverted incorrect maxweight:hgv tag to proper maxweightrating:hgv, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178007123 #OptimoRoute
aweech (2026-01-28 21:25:25+00:00): Congrats on 10000 changesets! 🎉
Xvtn (2026-01-28 22:30:52+00:00): Wow, thanks! I didn't even notice!
SekeRob (2026-01-26 13:47:28+00:00): Included removal of an old tagless line.
automotive_guy (2026-02-04 13:31:49+00:00): Really cool changeset!
a_random_lemurian (2026-01-30 21:29:26+00:00): Hi, I'd like to ask why you removed Port Elizabeth from the name. I believe that both names should be used
VisibleSouth (2026-02-07 14:48:11+00:00): Port Elizabeth was renamed 2021 (!) to Gqeberha. So, in OSM only use tag 'old name' for Port Elizabeth.
a_random_lemurian (2026-02-10 22:46:41+00:00): The name Port Elizabeth is still in common use, though. The new name is better off being in `official_name`
marcmarti (2026-01-29 18:57:24+00:00): Hi, please make sure to update relations if you are editing ways. You broke a bus relation
NeisBot (2026-01-27 06:32:57+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 19 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/587160668 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1470910418 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/456635783 v13 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/4612744053 v4
https://osm.org/node/4528922834 v6

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177722046
NeisReview (2026-02-04 06:37:50+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177779652
Serkan Celik (2026-01-26 14:32:31+00:00): Yeni bir villa eklendi,
yol eklendi,
cadde isimleri eklendi.
NeisBot (2026-01-27 06:35:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11775014043 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Wohnungsauflösung"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Wohnungsauflösung"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-04 06:37:43+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178079734
(No visible changes after review)
yelisey90 (2026-01-26 21:30:31+00:00): The drinking fountain is disused (probably temporarily) per https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4902346 . If it's still there, it should be restored and marked as disused, not deleted.
And why was the viewpoint deleted? The spot does indeed provide some great views of the city.
westnordost (2026-01-27 04:08:17+00:00): no, it's really completely gone. I was there yesterday. There is just pavement now. 

I deleted the binoculars because there are no binoculars. However, looking at the deleted element now, I see that indeed thos wasn't binoculars. The icon from the iD presets is misleading. I'll restore it, and also open an issue upstream.
westnordost (2026-01-27 04:11:02+00:00): Oh, it's too far in the past to restore it with StreetComplete. Could you do it? Otherwise, I can also just place a new node there.
westnordost (2026-01-27 06:36:30+00:00): https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/issues/1914
yelisey90 (2026-01-27 06:58:56+00:00): Yup, done it with Level0

Thanks for the info on the fountain!
Aye_Spiff (2026-01-26 14:51:51+00:00): The line describing Streets and pedestrian Pathways were obviously not properly positioned as they visibly cut through houses and bushes while deviating from the lines naturally shown on the ground. i therefore simply realign the streets properly.
Ltrlg (2026-01-28 08:17:19+00:00): Bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap.

Ce type de zone de retournement sans obstacle central correspond exactement à la définition du highway=turning_circle que vous avez retiré. On réserve usuellement le codage comme une voie circulaire aux cas où un obstacle est présent.
eggie (2026-01-26 15:50:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Wanneer dit de naam van de woning is kan deze beter op de gebouwomtrek.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-01-26 15:53:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   name=gate hoort niet op de kaart.
De juiste tag zou zijn barrier=gate. Er lopen twee wandelroutes door het hek. Ik pas het dus even aan met foot=yes
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Dindia (2026-03-09 18:10:00+00:00): Why not to add relation to the street as in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/329013731 and instead creating a pavement object?
Dindia (2026-03-09 18:11:35+00:00): It doesn't look right on the map and implies that there's something special about the street that requires this extra object, such as no sidewalk on the other side.
Dindia (2026-04-26 09:32:13+00:00): Itai, please respond to my comment.
Dindia (2026-05-01 20:02:55+00:00): I removed explisit pavements and correctd relations

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182091365
bernward1 (2026-01-27 06:55:28+00:00): Ich verstehe den Fixme in der Masterrelation nicht.
"Linienvarianten von Richtung und Gegenrichtung zu einer Linienvariante als Schleifenfahrt zusammenfassen."
Hin- und Rückweg werden doch in zwei Routen gemapped. Der Bus fährt doch keinen Rounparcour.
trial (2026-01-27 13:36:27+00:00): Bonjour, bienvenu dans OpenStreetMap.
mise à jour du bar : autant préserver l'ancien nom dans old_name.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13499097201 : merci de laisser les points d'adresse comme simple points d'adresse et de créer une point d'intêrêt (POI) librairie un peu en retrait dans le bâtiment. Ainsi on voit toujours l'adresse sur la carte et le commerce peut évoluer sans risque de casser l'adresse.

Sinon CoMaps est la variante plus libre d'Organics Maps.
Yunkers (2026-01-26 16:44:13+00:00): A znak ekspresówki to sam się przeniósł w inne miejsce?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-26 20:49:55+00:00): edycja chyba wycofana w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177727445
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-01-27 03:44:07+00:00): Merhaba. Yakın tarihli uydu görüntülerinde dahi sildiğiniz otopark görünüyor. Bu otoparkı neden sildiniz? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/761926928

---
Bu değişikliğinizde de https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/761926929 'i silmiş ve aynı yere yeniden çizmişsiniz. Lütfen mevcut nesneyi düzenleyiniz. Silip yeniden çizmeyiniz. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history 

Daha önceden de şu değişikliğinize aynı konuda yorum yazmıştım. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163582399#c1400669 Gözünüzden kaçmış galiba. 

----

addr:housenumber=* etiketine "No" ibaresini yazmadan doğrudan numarayı yazınız. 

----

phone=* etiketine numara yazarken parantez kullanmayınız. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage

İyi günler.
trial (2026-01-26 16:38:22+00:00): Et il vous a demandé de de le créer quatre fois, sérieux ?
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-01-26 20:29:47+00:00): Bonsoir, c'est corrigé Merci de l'alerte,Bonne soirée
trial (2026-01-26 16:38:13+00:00): Et il vous a demandé de de le créer quatre fois, sérieux ?
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-01-26 20:29:24+00:00): Bonsoir, c'est corrigé, désolé.Bonne soirée
trial (2026-01-26 16:38:31+00:00): Et il vous a demandé de de le créer quatre fois, sérieux ?
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-01-26 16:45:37+00:00): Bonsoir, 
nous avons rencontré un problème technique, nous allons solutionner le soucis et nettoyer. merci de vote alerte.
Bonne soirée
trial (2026-01-26 16:38:42+00:00): Et il vous a demandé de de le créer quatre fois, sérieux ?
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-01-26 20:31:17+00:00): Bonsoir, c'est corrigé.Bonne soirée
martinst (2026-01-28 14:20:13+00:00): name=* sollte nur für Eigennamen verwendet werden.
Zählende Bezeichner wie 366 werden bei ref= eingetragen.
eggie (2026-01-26 15:56:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
kortgodt (2026-02-05 17:39:13+00:00): Adelgade fra Ole Lund Kiekegaards Stræde til Asylgade er pt. under omdannelse til ensrettet brostenbelagtgade og ikke farbar. virker du har slettet mit edit af at vejen pt. er under ombygning og ikke farbar.
kortgodt (2026-02-05 18:22:14+00:00): https://www.skanderborg.dk/politik-og-faellesskab/udvikling-i-kommunen/fremtidens-adelgade
Lytter1 (2026-02-07 13:28:23+00:00): Tak for info, jeg skal nok holde mig fra denne vej igen indtil den er rettet. Beklager.
AndreaDp271 (2026-01-26 17:12:19+00:00): Ciao Francesco, vedo che sei un nuovo Mapper.
Ti ringrazio per aver provato a migliorare la mappa ma devo segnalarti che hai sbagliato (attenzione che le immagini satellitari sono vecchie). 
Più tardi sistemerò io.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177726571
Tomio (2026-01-26 18:05:39+00:00): A conversão da via particular em rua não respeita as regras estabelecidas pela comunidade local e nas Diretrizes do OSM. Pare com este tipo de edição, que é classificada como vandalismo. A insistência dessa prática resultará em denúncia ao DWG do OSM, com consequente bloqueio do usuário.
eggie (2026-01-26 17:07:18+00:00): Dag voyqina,

Lijkt me oke.
Ik heb nog wel de fietsoversteek hier aangepast. oneway=yes aangepast naar oneway=no

MVG
eggie
voyqina (2026-01-26 17:11:06+00:00): Dear Eggie,

Thanks for having a look at it. The bike path is indeed two ways. Thanks for fixing that.

Cheers,
Voyqina
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-19 10:25:48+00:00): Added required split at the intersection of Bristol St and West High Rd as fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177977044 #OptimoRoute
Taya_S (2026-01-26 19:13:00+00:00): Reverted sockpuppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177733706
Taya_S (2026-01-26 19:13:01+00:00): Reverted sockpuppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177733706
NeisBot (2026-01-26 16:26:12+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (5 changesets) shows that 354 of your last 356 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23754592
Glassman (2026-01-26 20:38:26+00:00): That seems like an unlikely location for the flock device. Can you please move it to the right location, not in the middle of the road. I usually look for the pole's shadow to get the right location.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177727435
JohnBrownDidNothingWrong (2026-01-26 20:43:14+00:00): It's in the curbed island just south of that pin. I didn't have the aerial on when I placed the point. It is a very strange location for one, but it was installed in the last 2 weeks. I drive this road daily.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177727435
Glassman (2026-01-26 22:16:03+00:00): I like the new location you moved it to better. This on the traffic island. BTW did you noticed the flock device that was added to the sidewalk just to the east? I remove it because it shouldn't be placed on the sidewalk and your location seems better.  though I didn't seen any pole shadows to indicate the exact placement so maybe very new.
JohnBrownDidNothingWrong (2026-01-26 22:18:17+00:00): I haven't seen that one added. I'll look for it this afternoon and see if I notice any others out there.
Entbert (2026-02-04 20:58:24+00:00): Hallo andyblueg, sehe ich das richtig, dass du in diesem und anderen Changesets Gemeindegrenzen löschst und die Verwaltungsrelationen stattdessen an die Küstenlinien klebst? Wenn ja, warum? Das ist genau das Gegenteil von dem, wie es sein sollte, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Grenze#Seew%C3%A4rtige_Kreis-_und_Gemeindegrenze
andyblueg (2026-02-05 11:16:46+00:00): Hallo Entbert,

Ich habe mich hier an der gängigen Praxis in der Region orientiert, siehe z.B. Rügen und Usedom. Die Gemeindegrenzen stammen aus einen Import von 2005 und waren schon damals teilweise nicht aktuell und ungenau
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Kreisgrenzen_Deutschland_2005). In den Bereichen, wo die Grenzen der Küstenlinie folgen, habe ich die Relation übertragen. Das vereinfacht die Anpassung an die Küstendynamik. Ausnahmen gibt es natürlich  an Häfen und Seebrücken, die ich deshalb versucht habe, zu korrigieren. Ich hoffe, das macht Sinn.