piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Aetolia (2025-04-28 18:02:43+00:00): According with the  Florence Protocol of 1913 and 1914 border Delamination Lake Drakolimni or Gistova is located in Greece. In addition it should be known that some illegally are moving border  pyramids on the ground between Greece and Albania . Also if you further want to be informed about both protocols they mainly talked about Northern Epiros Autonomy from the state of Albania. Facts are sacred comments are Free
Enderjius (2025-04-28 18:54:48+00:00): Absolutely correct the last sentence, not the first 90% of the comment. If you search a bit, it is quite difficult, but not impossible, to find the scanned version in PDF of the protocol. It is in French, but still understandable. On feuille 13, named GRAMOS, the lake, called "Lac Guesdova," is split exactly in half. Therefore, reclaiming it within Greece's borders constitutes a complete violation of the delimited border. If you cannot find the PDF I can send it to you.
Aetolia (2025-04-28 23:52:59+00:00): Keep the PDF to yourself . The final touch was placed in 1925. Nevertheless, nice try. You are telling me that 100 years from 1925 nobody complained until now? Fascist, Italy occupied Albania and invaded Greece never mentioned this kind of issue. Albania under communism and all maps Western and Albanian show lake Gistova in Greece.  Now suddenly out of the Blue Gistova sudden became Albanian in google map and now half and half. Nevertheless send the PDF to the Albania Foreign ministry if you like and make it an official complain. Until then facts are sacred comments are free.
Aetolia (2025-04-28 23:55:55+00:00): Not to say anything about the rest of the 90% percent concerning North Epiros that happens to be true concerning the Florence Protocols..faleminderit
Enderjius (2025-04-29 06:44:51+00:00): I'm not interested into north epirus, fascism, communism or western and so should be you. Here we talk about border delimitation and you're trying to pass a false narrative. The maps posted aren't sufficiently detailed, and don't even have the lake. That's why I'm asking you to check the original ones.
Again, online you can find yourself the scannered version of the protocol, but I'll spare you some time: https://smallpdf.com/file#s=b8e7c99a-7bd3-4c79-aedb-61784516e92e
marczoutendijk_repair (2025-04-28 17:59:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165560512 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for non discussed edits
eggie (2025-04-27 18:40:43+00:00): Dag Navazor,

Je vraagt feedback...  Geen oneway=no op reguliere wegen gaan taggen.
Dat is default. We doen dat alleen als je bang bent dat een medemapper oneway=yes gaat taggen. Bv op een tweerichting fietsrotonde. 
MVG
eggie
marczoutendijk (2025-04-27 18:35:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17587
marczoutendijk_repair (2025-04-28 17:59:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165560512 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for non discussed edits
eggie (2025-04-27 16:00:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Je node met name=Speeltuin (niet name gebruiken om iets te beschrijven) en leisure=playground heb ik weer verwijderd. De speeltuin met naam Avonturenspeelplaats staat al op het grote vlak.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
woodpeck (2025-04-27 18:24:05+00:00): Hello and welcome CedriC8722! In your first edits you have patiently filled out the "changeset comment" field which is great! That way, you give other mappers a chance to see at one glance what your edits was about.

In your most recent changesets you have switched to using just "." as a changeset comment. It would be very welcome if you could return to writing good comments. It is really helpful!
CedriC8722 (2025-04-27 18:31:34+00:00): Bonjour,
Je vous remercie pour votre retour.
Pour cette publication qui concernait de multiple points. Je ne savais pas quoi mettre pour décrire largement mais globalement les modifications. Mais en l état j ai principalement modifié des points que je suis sûr de connaître car j habite juste à côté.
Je serai vigilant pour les prochaines fois.
Pour savoir, est ce que les commentaires que je mets lors de l envoi seront visibles des autres utilisateurs après la publication ?
Merci à vous pour votre temps.
Cordialement
nevw (2025-05-12 20:33:29+00:00): Similar here
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.26539&lat=-4.33741&zoom=19
ivanbranco (2025-04-27 15:07:21+00:00): Ciao Emabarto, 

i nomi delle strade erano corretti prima, vedi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Nomi_delle_strade 

In particolare: "Le aree di circolazione che riportano date composte solo da giorni e mese, si inseriscono esplicitando il giorno in lettere. Es: Via Venticinque Aprile. Eventualmente usate il tag alt_name=* per inserire il giorno con i numeri romani. Es: Via XXV Aprile."

riesci a ripristinare la situazione precedente?
Emabarto (2025-04-27 15:10:46+00:00): Si ripristino, grazie per avermelo fatto notare
eggie (2025-04-27 15:22:31+00:00): Dag Navazo..

Dit zijn oneigenlijke tags. Gebruik geen name=... om iets te beschrijven.
name= is voorbehouden aan  officiële straatnamen.
Dus geen name=Jumbo Ingang en Uitgang.
Ook die parkeerplaatsen hebben geen naam. 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=165510520

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-04-27 15:25:23+00:00): Oneigenlijke straatnamen heb ik verwijderd. De tagging bij de Aldi op het vlak gezet.
Wellicht kun je hier wat aanwijzingen vinden Good practice   
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice

Groet
eggie
Navazor (2025-04-27 16:08:59+00:00): Dag Eggie,

Documentatie zegt:
    The most prominent name on a sign posted on the feature itself, especially for a feature in the built environment
    The name of the feature on a sign elsewhere, such as a guidepost
    Common or official usage, especially for a feature in the natural environment

Dit zou vallen onder "Common usage"

Mvg,
eggie (2025-04-27 16:14:46+00:00): Oke, maar het zijn geen straatnamen.
Je zou evt wel description kunnen gebruiken.
Het is overigens niet gebruikelijk om die parkeerplaatsen een naam te geven. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-04-27 16:20:29+00:00): De 'namen' van de parkeerplaatsen heb ik weer toegevoegd aan de vlakken. Het het echt Parking (Engels)  hier? Ook In- en Uitgang. Je zou het aan de orde kunnen stellen op het forum. Ik volg als validator gewoon de consensus en straten krijgen alleen officiële straatnamen. 
Wie weet denken de forumleden er anders over.
Niet alles is zwart wit.

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2025-04-27 16:35:01+00:00): Vraag het eens op het forum.....  Ben wel benieuwd wat daar dan uitkomt.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43

Bij die namen is ook de consensus om bv niet Ingang en uitgang Brandweerkazerne als straatnaam op te nemen. 

Gr eggie
felipeeugenio (2025-04-27 15:21:27+00:00): Id	Contributor	Tmstmp UTC	Action	Comment
4728830	felipeeugenio	2025-04-27 17:20	closed	ok
4728835	felipeeugenio	2025-04-27 17:20	closed	ok
4728849	felipeeugenio	2025-04-27 17:20	closed	ok
4728836	felipeeugenio	2025-04-27 17:20	closed	ok
4728837	felipeeugenio	2025-04-27 17:20	closed	ok
4728838	felipeeugenio	2025-04-27 17:20	closed	ok
4728832	felipeeugenio	2025-04-27 17:20	closed	ok
4728839	felipeeugenio	2025-04-27 17:20	closed	ok
4728834	felipeeugenio	2025-04-27 17:20	closed	ok
4729444	felipeeugenio	2025-04-27 17:14	closed	ok
Mezonens (2025-04-29 17:48:15+00:00): Hi! Removed the non-existent road segment. Changeset: 165603452
silversurfer83 (2025-04-27 15:50:23+00:00): Hi :)

warum machst du aus dem Pfad einen cycleway, wenn es doch ein gemeinsamer Fuß- und Radweg ist. Da halte ich es für besser den neutralen path zu nutzen, da ja auch beide access Werte auf designated stehen.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165510973
jengelh (2025-04-27 17:14:25+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Duck_tagging
silversurfer83 (2025-04-27 17:39:24+00:00): 🤔

Kann ich in Grenzen nachvollziehen. Wir haben hier aber einen *gemeinsamen* Rad- und Fußweg. Das ist nunmal kein Radweg, auch wenn es gerne so genannt wird. So lange hier segregated=no gilt bin ich Freund des etablierten hw=path. Ist nämlich genauso halbgar wie die Beschilderung und Infrastruktur die damit erfasst wird.
jengelh (2025-04-27 18:00:38+00:00): >Wir haben hier aber einen [gemeinsamen] Rad- und Fußweg. Das ist nunmal kein Radweg

etwas, das A und B ist, sei kein A? Hörst du dich überhaupt selber?

Mal ganz abgesehen davon, wenn das so geil wäre, würde man ja auch statt {highway=primary} {highway=road road:class=primary} oder sowas in der Art machen.
silversurfer83 (2025-04-27 18:14:21+00:00): Entschuldige. Ich habe das Wort "reiner" vor "Radweg" vergessen.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-27 15:31:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12791820931
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/382756467

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
aceman444 (2025-04-30 14:57:28+00:00): No neviem, ak sa Vam zdalo, ze vacsinu chodnikov bolo potrebne posunut o par centimetrov, tak OK, dakujeme. Snad to zase o par rokov podla novej Ortofoto nebude niekto napravat opacnym smerom.

Ale https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388148758 nepotrebovalo public_transport=platform, to je uz na bode https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3188970337, ktory reprezentuje toto nastupiste. Zaujimave, ze na vedlajsie nastupistia ste to nedali.

Preco je budova https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1082657678 na layer=1? Nemali by to mat prave chodniky, ktore idu po nej (kedze cast je podzemna) ?

Zmeny na Culenovej ulici su nespravne. Cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1381679931 je zbytocna, nie je tam uz bariera, takze sa cesty mohli spojit ako to bolo predtym. Cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/736324478 tiez zbytocne roztiahnutie na sever, povodne umiestnenie bolo spravne. To ze je tam plna ciara nie je dovodom nespojit cesty. Nie je to fyzicka bariera. Cesty ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1183045407 ste poposuvali, ale teraz nesedi ich logika na hodnotu znacky placement.
A cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1183045408 teraz pretina ostrovcek, takze aj tato zmena uplne zbytocna.

Naco bolo potrebne oddelit cast cesty https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1381679899 ? Nema ine vlastnosti ako cesta z ktorej ste usek oddelili.

Preco oddelenie useku https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1381679893 ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12791847431 je aka tovaren, ze man_made=works? Robia automatizaciu, vyrabaju tie stroje tu v tej budove?
A ich webstranku ste mohli pridat.

A tie zmeny highway=unclassified na residential to podla akeho kluca viete lepsie ako domaci maperi?

A uvadzajte skutocne zdroje. Rychlostni limity, surface ci firmy na Ortotofomozaike nevidite.
🇨🇿 Roman Horník (2025-05-02 22:26:02+00:00): 1) To nebylo o posunutí chodníků, ale o odstranění hromady zbytečných bodů na nich. Vedle toho, že jsou tvarově čistší, ne, jako by je kreslil parkinsonik, zaberou míň dat.

2) U jednoho nástupiště mi editor iD úpravu navrhl, u druhýho ne.

3) Dost možná proto, že už layer=1 měla. Zpravidla neupravuju vrstvy.

4) TL;DR, krom toho spoustu svých změn nevidím, nemůžu se k nim vyjádřit.

5) Ad Brightpick Innovation Hub - Nakládal jsem tam stroj, měli jich tam víc, takže asi se tam budou vyrábět. A ta webovka - proč bych ji tam přidával? To neumíš? Já tam tu firmu dával kvůli tomu, aby se dala najít navigací. Ale díky za připomenutí, ŠEVT jsem odstranil, už tam totiž není (je to tam napsaný na ceduli).

6) highway=unclassified - asi by to chtělo dovzdělat se: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:highway=unclassified

7) Pán riaditeľ OSM, upravuju místa, kde jsem fyzicky byl, firmy, co jsem navštívil, to snad jako zdroj stačí, ne?
aceman444 (2025-05-03 12:50:54+00:00): 1) nejake 3 body ste ubrali jedine tak na Pribinovej, naopak ste nejake zbytocne body pridali, len aby boli na cestach krajsie obluciky. Takze neviem o com hovorite.
A ak nazyvate predoslych autorov, co to aspon nejako nakreslili v minulosti podla horsich fotiek alebo podla realneho prieskumu na mieste parkinsonikmi, tak to asi nie je vhodny pristup.

2) Navrhy editora iD su velmi sporne a treba im dobre rozumiet, ci navrhovana zmena je spravna alebo nie. Nie ich naslepo odklikavat.

3) Nie, layer=1 ste pridali Vy. Pytam sa teda, preco je budova nad chodnikom a nie chodnik nad budovou.

4) Bavime sa o tejto sade zmien: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=165511140 kde su Vase zmeny jasne vidiet.

5) No vacsinou je dobre webstranku pridat, aby bolo mozne overit, ci ste firmu pridali dobre. Ja neviem, ci som nasiel spravnu webstranku (zrejme ide o pobocku zahranicnej firmy). Vy ked ste tam boli, tak to viete lepsie posudit.

6) Nie kazda cesta v meste musi byt 'residential'. Takze na ktoru vetu na tej wiki sa odvolavate?

7) Urcite ste neboli na vsetkych tych uliciach. Je evidentne, ze tato sada zmien (okrem tej firmy) su cisto len automaticke zmeny podla Ortofotomozaiky v danej oblasti Bratislavy.

Ale ak ste na tych miestach boli, tak na prislusne objekty alebo aspon sadu zmien treba pridat aj zdroj 'survey', nie len Ortofotomozaika. Cize Vy sam ste v sade zmien napisali len Ortofoto, a teraz tvrdite, ze je zdroj iny. Staci ho uvadzat.

Na mnohe otazky ste stale neodpovedali.

A mam tu nove nalezy:
Preco by mala byt tato cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1214553504 layer=-1? Aky to ma vyznam? Vsetky cesty v ramci nej nemaju layer (cize 0) a okrem toho je na povrchu a nic nie je nad nou (okrem mohlo bollardov).
Preco nezmyselne spolocne body ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12791851153 ciest, ktore sa fyzicky nekrizuju v jednej urovni (su na roznych poschodiach) ? Dokonca spoj chodnika s fontanou https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12791851156, ktore tiez su v roznych poschodiach? Aj tam ste boli a isli ste podzemnu pasazou do vody fontany? Asi tazko.
Aky zmysel ma layer=-1 na relacii https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7404857 ? Pod cim je toto namestie?
aceman444 (2026-01-21 22:35:50+00:00): A ak tvrdite (v inej sade zmien), ze cesty upravujte, aby Vam presnejsie vychadzali vzdialenosti v navigacii, tak napr. vyrovnanim Mileticovej idete proti tomuto cielu, kedze v niektorych usekoch kopirovala stredovu ciaru, teda aj jazdne pruhy isli pori nej a teda aj vozidlo pojde tak "parkinsonicky" a pridaju sa mu nejake metre. Toto ste znicili. Samozrejme tiec po Vasich upravach nesedia znacky "placement" na nove umiestnenie cesty.
Taktiez napr. vyrovnanie cyklocesty https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1381679932 je asi nespravne, kedze v skutocnosti je taka kriva. Potvrdzuju to aj snimky. Cize zase zmena, co viac skodi ako nieco prinasa.
Rovnako https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7926291575 ste posunuli na nespravne miesto (vidiet na Ortofoto).

Uplne nespravne zrusenie ciest ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243709752 a https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243709753 a ich zlucenie do jednej cesty https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204023833, hoci mali rozne znacky a rozny pristup vozidiel. Nova cesta absolutne nezodpoveda dopravnym znackam na mieste a zablokovali ste pristup ku garazam, parkovisku a jednej ulici.

Cize asi len halabala vyrovnavate, len aby ste vyrovnavali, bez ohladu na realitu a na nejaky prinos pre navigaciu (ktory aj tak nema zmysel a je v OSM zakazany ked optimalizujete pre jeden typ vozidla a jednu navigaciu).
bbqman (2025-04-27 15:31:07+00:00): also source: survey
eggie (2025-04-27 18:33:46+00:00): Dag Navzor.

Tip   Parkeerstroken langs de weg zijn geen parkeerterreinen. Die worden getagd  als amenity=parking met parking=street_side  en evt orientation=perpendicular / parallel of diagonal.
Het levert ook minder prominente P's op. 
Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-04-27 18:34:04+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=165511449
eggie (2025-04-27 18:38:19+00:00): Hier kun je vinden hoe je die parkeerstroken mapt:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side
Nzau (2025-06-24 18:24:49+00:00): Bonjour Neitag61,
Je viens de supprimer quelques tags d'accès.
En effet, il n'est pas utile de remplir tout le formulaire pour chaque mode de transport avec yes (bicycle, foot...), puisque cela est déjà induit par défaut.
Au plaisir d'en discuter,
Nzau
Mezonens (2025-04-29 18:03:12+00:00): Hi! Restored to highway=residential. Officially it's called Samteņu iela, even though it's gated. A path is usually a narrow way intended for pedestrians and not suitable for two-track vehicles. In this case, it's enough to specify access=private. Changeset: 165603817
richlv (2025-04-29 19:19:59+00:00): The smaller offshoots might also be classified as highway=service, depending on their condition.
jimkats (2025-08-15 23:02:58+00:00): In this changeset, you destroyed a proper junction and practically reversed it to the previous erroneous one. Why you change stuff of areas you don't know?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/37.663718/22.699642
ViewStreet (2025-08-15 23:32:12+00:00): I have been there that's why i fixed it.
This is a crossroad, not a curve with 2 branches, right?
As a driver that I use OSM the shape of the cross represents exactly how is the road that I am about to pass through.
The curve of the asphalt is technically not applied on a CROSSROAD!!
silversurfer83 (2025-04-27 19:07:19+00:00): Hi :)

Kurzer Disclaimer: Ich will dich nicht ärgern und hab dich nicht "aufm Kieker". Ich gucke mir bloß viele Änderungen im Umkreis an.

Also: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1381685981
Da sehen die access-Werte irgendwie unpassend aus. Auf einem Waldweg erwarte ich eigentlich "forestry" als Freigabewert. Wie ist denn die Beschilderung? Motorfahrzeuge oder Fahrzeuge allgemein?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165513113
jengelh (2025-04-27 19:25:14+00:00): w~981 ist als Auftrennung von way 539916540 entstanden, etwaige access-Werte nur durch JOSM kopiert.
silversurfer83 (2025-04-28 03:17:21+00:00): Also kannst du nicht genau sagen wie die Situation on the ground ist?
jengelh (2025-04-28 06:49:59+00:00): https://paste.opensuse.org/pastes/60504a843b6a
osm.org/changeset/53701040
osm.org/changeset/54937680
silversurfer83 (2025-04-28 20:22:53+00:00): Das interpretiere ich als "nein". Ok. Danke.
Cyclono (2025-04-30 09:32:28+00:00): Hello, can you explain the residential area removal?
Cyclono (2025-04-30 09:33:11+00:00): Yeah I have reported this as Vandalism. Sorry but this is unacceptable
luisforte (2025-04-30 10:14:09+00:00): I didn't even try to evaluate the correctness of the cited editions, but your "discussion" is ridiculous.
You open a discussion and, without waiting for a response from the other participant, a minute later you report this changeset as vandalism??!!
Cyclono (2025-04-30 10:17:51+00:00): I reverted this edit, sorry you have to start over
Cyclono (2025-04-30 10:18:38+00:00): @luisfort this is not the first time residential area has been deleted in portugal. Sorry but other discussions have led to nothing.
topolusitania (2025-04-30 16:16:50+00:00): Respect!
Report vandalism on a Reino Baptista edition, without an answer from him is not correct! Reino Baptista has , as you, ten years of OSM editions! 
Rgds
TL
Reino Baptista (2025-04-30 16:20:20+00:00): Dear Jimiiee,
From this thread of comments, I understand that the residential area has been restored as you intended. I assume no further action is required from my side.

Since you promptly reported me for vandalism over the removal of a single line during a complex and careful edit, I no longer wish to engage in further dialogue.

Regarding your revert of my edit, no problem — I’ll restore all my previous edits at the next opportunity.

Thank you.
RB
NeisBot (2025-05-17 15:10:24+00:00): Hi Luz Espinola, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 87% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 14 building(s)
- 14 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=165513528
highflyer74 (2025-05-25 07:34:37+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Hier ist ein bisschen etwas durcheinander gegangen. Denke daran, dass ein Objekt in der Realität auch eines in OSM entspricht. Ich habe die Wiese jetzt entsprechend aufgeteilt und mit den richten Tags versehen. Könntest du bitte den hier gemappten Node (Punkt) an die richtige Stelle verschieben, wo sich das Wildbienenhotel tatsächlich befindet? Danke!

Wenn du noch Fragen hast, melde dich gern direkt hier im Änderungssatz.

Viele Grüße!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 17:28:19+00:00): Hello!

You used
horse=non
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1160958183/history

Have you maybe meant
horse=no
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Papryczka (2025-04-27 17:35:29+00:00): Cześć,
tag `name` powinien być używany jedynie w przypadku nazwy własnej, używanie tzw. nazw opisowych jest błędem (źródło: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#When_not_to_use ).
Z góry Dzięki!
SomeoneElse (2025-04-27 16:55:10+00:00): Thanks!
stillhart (2025-05-04 08:54:22+00:00): How does the shape around here make sense? All these lines in and out?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12791950542
kaleidoscopica (2025-05-05 14:24:03+00:00): I just transcribe the boundaries that are on the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service map. I am guessing they have only acquired part of the land they eventually want to own, but they would be the ones you'd want to ask that question, ultimately.
stillhart (2025-05-05 16:42:05+00:00): ok, very weird 😯.
Thanks for answering, :-)
kaleidoscopica (2025-05-05 16:49:29+00:00): You are apparently not the only one who found it weird, as someone has already tried to change it to something more "normal-looking": https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165825363#map=14/25.96850/-97.16326

Let's see how this user responds, but I feel his edits will need to be reverted.
stillhart (2025-05-05 17:10:16+00:00): Starbase just got the "city" status, so I assume quite a few mappers are now having a look at this corner of the world :-)
FroschForscher (2025-05-01 18:20:46+00:00): Zur info: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165516229
ika-chan! (2025-04-27 17:28:26+00:00): Scratch this edit (superseded by 165516263), the landuse was playing silly games with me, which kinda says a lot about how easy (or not) it is to edit via iD. The documentation probably needs refining to show up on iD.
grzegorz75jan (2025-04-27 22:08:25+00:00): Thanks for correcting "wikimedia commons" Why didn't I detect that myself.

I'm getting dementia.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165516960
Famlam (2025-05-06 18:49:21+00:00): From the wiki of roller_coaster=track:
> Don't use oneway=yes.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:roller%20coaster=track

Can you fix it please?
AAA-Batterij (2025-05-07 13:42:38+00:00): Should be fixed now.
Yog Sot (2025-04-27 22:09:01+00:00): wincyj betonu :} NO niestety zielone sąsiedztwo juz nie wróci ;]
amosharper (2025-04-29 14:41:45+00:00): At least 45 of these buildings have an address node as part of the area way (outline) listing them as number 36 - could you please check?
amosharper (2025-04-29 14:42:57+00:00): This looks to also be true of changeset 165518584.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165518584