piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-17 19:10:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430016513

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
GinaroZ (2023-02-17 23:02:35+00:00): If the cycle path is closed off and under construction it should really be tagged as highway=construction
vojtechzaboril (2023-02-25 10:44:22+00:00): Dont use something like arrows to indicate, that the powerline continues! Use tags like fixme=continue on the last node!
CityEnginer (2023-02-20 16:22:52+00:00): Ah okay, that makes sense. Thank you.
limes11 (2023-02-18 13:04:35+00:00): Hallo swall83,

warum hast du hier den highway-Wert auf primary geändert? Mit einer Kraftfahrstraße hat das nichts zu tun, war auch zuvor nicht als solche erfasst. Hat sich hier etwas baulich geändert?

VG Limes
swall83 (2023-02-18 19:43:01+00:00): Dieser Abschnitt ist keine Kraftfahrstraße und ist nur zweispurig, deswegen sehe ich wirklich keine Rechtfertigung für die Klassifikation als trunk. Wäre das eine Kraftfahrstraße, egal ob mit baulicher Trennung oder ohne, dann würde das mMn schon dafür ausreichen, es als trunk einzustufen, auch laut Wiki. Deshalb habe ich die Westtangente von der St 2080 zur A8 als trunk belassen.
limes11 (2023-02-18 20:04:01+00:00): Mehrspurigkeit oder Kraftfahrstraße sind bei der Frage nicht relevant. Im Prinzip ist das eine Definitionsfrage. Wäre die Westtangente ausgebaut, dann könnte man bis zur RO29 trunk mappen. Da sie es nicht ist, hat dieses kleine Stück keinen trunk-Charakter. Von daher würde ich es auch auf primary setzen. Passt schon.
swall83 (2023-02-18 20:17:17+00:00): Nun ja, der deutschlandspezifische Konsens scheint zu sein, dass das durchaus relevante Kriterien sind: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk#Definition_f%C3%BCr_Deutschland
Auch in der Praxis hat jede trunk in Deutschland, die mir untergekommen ist, mindestens eine der zwei Bedingungen erfüllt:
-baulich getrennte Fahrbahnen
-Kraftfahrtstraße (oder Quasi-Kraftfahrtstraße, mit Verbot für Fahrräder, Traktoren etc.)
Aber gut, bei dieser Straße scheinen wir uns ja einig zu sein
limes11 (2023-02-18 20:29:37+00:00): Schau dir mal den ersten Absatz hier an 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk#Definition_f%C3%BCr_Deutschland

Es ist nunmal so, dass solche Straßen oft Kraftfahrstraßen sind und auch häufig getrennte Fahrspuren haben, aber das ist nur Korrelation, keine Kausalität.
maraf24 (2023-04-06 19:34:05+00:00): Wycofałem.
Allison P (2023-03-01 18:25:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147138477 seems not to exist, or maybe it's misaligned. Any insight?
SamWhited (2023-03-02 11:21:27+00:00): I don't remember off the top of my head, but if you want to leave a note on it I can check the next time I walk by. I vaguely remember thinking that several houses were missing here.
lefuturiste (2023-02-27 07:21:14+00:00): Merci de ne pas enlever man_made=street_cabinet
street_cabinet=power
sur le noeud: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1062201665/history
cela à une importance sémantique!
Max-Kritic (2023-02-27 13:00:32+00:00): Street_cabinet est déprécié. Donc à ne plus utilisé.
lefuturiste (2023-02-27 13:06:14+00:00): En effet, j'avais loupé cette info dans le wiki (qui d'ailleurs n'est pas clairement indiqué)
Néanmoins, pour être exact il s'agit de `street_cabinet=power` qui est déprécié mais `man_made=street_cabinet`est toujours d'actualité car il faut bien renseigner le fait que c'est un cabinet.

voir. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Utility_facilities
Max-Kritic (2023-02-27 17:16:08+00:00): Je n'ai pas supprimé "man_made=street_cabinet".

J'ai remplacé "street_cabinet=power" par "utility=power".
kartler175 (2023-02-18 12:13:46+00:00): Was willt Du mit dieser Relation darstellen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15489316 ?
Diagro1982 (2023-02-19 10:49:21+00:00): Auf der genannten Homepage ist der GPX Track für die D-Route 10 aktualisiert worden, die entlang der Elbe von Cuxhaven nach Bad Schandau geht. Diese Route weicht in Teilen von der Route der Elberadweg-Homepage ab, daher die neue Relation.
kartler175 (2023-02-19 11:21:10+00:00): Aber was hat das mit einer Grenze (type=boundary) zu tun?
Diagro1982 (2023-02-19 11:33:59+00:00): Den Type "boundary" habe ich nicht eingetragen, bei Type steht "route". Oder was genau meinst du?
Diagro1982 (2023-02-19 11:37:51+00:00): Falls da ein "boundary" drin ist, ist das nicht gewollt, aber ich sehe bei der Relation bei Type "route".
kartler175 (2023-02-19 12:25:07+00:00): Aber nicht in der von mir verlinkten Relation 15489316. Siehe auch Versionshistorie:
https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/15489316
Diagro1982 (2023-02-19 12:41:22+00:00): Sorry, hatte diese Relation versehentlich erstellt und gerade wieder gelöscht. Danke für den Hinweis.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-02-18 02:43:14+00:00): DWG revert for vandalism: changeset/132701185
Nathan_A_RF (2023-02-17 21:05:27+00:00): Hi, please only use the PTv2 tag when the route is fully tagged as according. I have removed the tags for now.
Dimitar155 (2023-02-18 12:48:18+00:00): Здравей Хрис,

Къщата за гости е добавена на правилното място (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10606234105). Къщата с грешните координати (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10674475206) е изтрита, тя сама ще изчезне от приложението което ползваш след известно време.

Поздрави,
Митко
gscholz (2023-02-21 06:33:43+00:00): Hi geoprocessamento UISA,
this changeset has added a huge amount of errors to the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes
and not connected ways:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-57.05365&lat=-14.75515&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=long_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way%2Clong_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-57.05365&lat=-14.75515&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Csnap_points%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1%2Cunconnected_open_ends_2%2Cunconnected_open_ends_3%2Cunconnected_open_ends_4%2Cunconnected_open_ends_5%2Cunconnected_open_ends_6

https://osmcha.org/changesets/132692480/

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-02-20 05:53:01+00:00): Hi geoprocessamento UISA,
this changeset has added a huge amount of errors to the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes
and not connected ways:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-57.05365&lat=-14.75515&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=long_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way%2Clong_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-57.05365&lat=-14.75515&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Csnap_points%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1%2Cunconnected_open_ends_2%2Cunconnected_open_ends_3%2Cunconnected_open_ends_4%2Cunconnected_open_ends_5%2Cunconnected_open_ends_6

https://osmcha.org/changesets/132692499/

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-02-21 06:29:34+00:00): Hi geoprocessamento UISA, 
due to your missing response I have reverted this changeset now to fix those issues.
Guido
MxxCon (2023-02-18 02:00:29+00:00): Hello.
Shouldn't it be "Вулворт Билдинг"?
And in general, shouldn't each word be capitalized since they are names?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132692599
woodwayfarer (2023-02-19 21:46:48+00:00): There is a well-established model of naming of such buildings. Other well-known examples are "Эмпайр-стейт-билдинг" and "Крайслер-билдинг".
MxxCon (2023-02-19 22:00:36+00:00): That doesn't seem to be grammatically correct for the Russian language rules. These are 2 and 3 separate words, not joined words. 🤔
woodwayfarer (2023-02-20 11:28:15+00:00): If by referring to "joined words" you are questioning using hyphens between them, I can answer that this is absolutely within the standard rules of naming foreign geographical objects which consist of multiple words. For instance, "New York"->"Нью-Йорк".
On the other hand, after you brought to my attention the question of which letter case (upper or lower) should be used at the beginning of the second word, i looked in several rule books and did not find a definitive answer there. There are different rules for different cases and I'm not sure which is ours. So while I can't be 100% sure about the rules, I can still refer to examples in modern translated literature. For example, Woolworth Building is mentioned in the script for the film "Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them", in the translation of which this exact writing (Вулворт-билдинг) is used.
Frans S (2023-02-25 16:19:52+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
square each rectangular building.
Don't collect multiple buildings and tag them as 1 building.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132692875
Frans S (2023-02-19 09:46:38+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark. Tracks are to be mapped as access to farmland, wood, rivers.
Not in between built areas
See this wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2023-02-27 09:33:54+00:00): Hello again.
About mapping small buildings.
Please do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.
Best regards
Frans S (2023-02-18 11:48:10+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
Mapping of tall (high) buildings.  

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the roof lines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the roof lines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
birdlymaps (2023-02-20 22:43:04+00:00): Thank you for the info!
cyton (2023-02-18 03:49:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3511055
cyton (2023-02-18 03:49:10+00:00): naja, das mit der erde drüber ist auch nur im frohnauer wald ein problem.
da wurden pläne gemacht für eine komplette bebauung, die straßen wurden gebaut und dann... wurde doch nicht gebaut.
an anderer stelle sind das nun reine waldwege, aber irgendwo untten drunter sind bordsteine und plasterung, die man gar nicht mehr sehen kann.
zb.; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326399212 ist eigentlich überall gleich gepflastert... 
nur effektiv nicht als solches nutzbar, da erde bzw. schlamm nach regen drüber liegt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132693546
stillhart (2025-10-02 07:08:33+00:00): 😍
Frans S (2023-02-22 15:04:27+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
cyton (2023-02-18 02:48:06+00:00): osm.org/note/3511056
cyton (2023-02-18 02:50:09+00:00): ich werd auch mal deinen anderen changesets durchgehen und die notes und changesets zueinander verlinken. das kann übrigens auch ein addon in josm; https://github.com/kmpoppe/noteSolver/ das ist auch in josm in der liste zu finden
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132693833
MxxCon (2023-02-18 02:08:49+00:00): Hello.
Shouldn't this be "Стадион Метлайф"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132693968
yitimox (2023-02-22 19:04:33+00:00): ARNAVUTKÖY HABİBLER YOLUNU  VE BASAKDEHİR FENERTPEE YOLUNU CADDE KADEGORISINE KOYMAK HATADIR OTOYLDAN BİR ALTI OLAN DUBLE YOYL KATEFROSNDE OLMAILIDIR DUZNELEMERLINIZ MANTIKDI$IDIR
GUFSZ (2023-02-17 20:49:45+00:00): Weil zu schnell auf Hochladen geklickt.

Bockenheimer Anlage wurde um dem Weiher gänzlich gesperrt, um die Wege zu erneuern. 

Wer die Wege nach den Bauarbeiten wiederherstellen will, hier kann er das vorherige Tagging nachsehen.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1rk8
habi (2023-02-17 20:51:33+00:00): Because of discussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132668659
Frans S (2023-02-18 09:30:00+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
Mapping of tall (high) buildings.  

mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the roof lines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the roof lines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

Best regards.
bxl-forever (2023-02-17 21:30:45+00:00): Hello,

When I look at URBIS aerial imagery, which is the official reference in the Brussels Region, or at the numerical imagery we have, the tracks look less correlated to reality now than they were before you moved them.  This node is one such example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5643667566

Any reason why you  chose to use AIV Flanders imagery instead? And even with that imagery, I don’t see why the tracks should be drawn next to where they are.  Anything we should be aware of?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-22 20:09:18+00:00): Can you explain meaning and purpose of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15493562 ?

Is this mass edit consulted with community?
fititnt (2023-03-02 10:21:50+00:00): @Mateusz Konieczny no.

I'm not able to talk on the local community channels now, so no idea if need to revert or not. Maybe someone already is in touch with them. However, this seems to be this Drone project https://www.uisa.com.br/noticias/equipes-tai-e-agricola-da-uisa-participam-de-evento-sobre-tecnologia-e-aplicacoes-espaciais . Maybe they just don't know how to contact the local channels.

But at first, the region did not have a lot of data before, so maybe others here will try to discuss first or something. But for sure, the names on the lines is something that would be removed, even if the geometries stay.
theophrastos (2023-02-19 11:01:47+00:00): Did you notice, that the parking situation at Schillerplatz (and Schönleinsplatz) is already mapped using the parking:lane system?
Pavol33 (2023-02-19 16:13:41+00:00): Hi,

nein. Sorry
Leo Slager (2023-02-17 22:41:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2023-02-17 22:46:31+00:00): Dag Candy Tells,
Zoals je ziet waren veel gegevens van het bedrijf al aanwezig op de kaart,
Bedrijfsgegevens voegen we in NL toe aan de adresnode en niet aan de gebouwen.
Trouwens een gebouw in een gebouw tekenen is natuurlijk niet mogelijk.
Wellicht goed om te weten dat gebouwen en adressen rechtstreeks worden geïmporteerd vanuit het Kadaster. 
ik pas het even aan.
Candy Tells (2023-02-20 09:31:28+00:00): Top weet ik dat ook weer,

MvG,

Jeffrey Nelissen (Candy Tells)
DressyPear4 (2023-02-18 09:19:10+00:00): Olá, você percebeu que estas estradas estão todas duplicadas?
E essas vias no meio de lavouras são 'track' não devem ser classificadas como 'unclassified'
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132695116
Nils Nolde (2023-02-22 08:56:51+00:00): This is really bad! Processing the planet daily for Valhalla, I realized this produces MILLIONS of warning because of nonsense tags like "layer=s".
gscholz (2023-02-21 06:37:02+00:00): Hi geoprocessamento UISA,
this changeset has added a huge amount of errors to the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes
and not connected ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-57.03732&lat=-14.80901&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132695139

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-02-21 06:40:48+00:00): Hi geoprocessamento UISA, 
due to your missing responsiveness regarding your last changeset where different complains were filed, I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
Frans S (2023-02-18 09:21:59+00:00): Maping of tall (high buildings.  


mapping of tall buildings is different from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the roof lines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the roof lines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

Best regards.
cyton (2023-02-18 03:44:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2870763
cyton (2023-02-18 03:44:53+00:00): leider kann man auf meinen kartaview bildern nicht gut zur seite sehen, ich müsste (und will) bessere 360° bilder mit meiner gopro max machen
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132695456
SomeoneElse (2023-03-02 12:25:24+00:00): Hello EnglandEditor019, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Just in case you are not aware, the Ukrainian community in OSM has said this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war

I would therefore suggest that it's not a good idea to remotely map in Ukraine while the war is ongoing.

Best Regards,
Andy
cyton (2023-02-18 03:38:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2859311
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132695537
Frans S (2023-02-26 16:19:08+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132695587
Frans S (2023-02-26 16:19:30+00:00): About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Please adjust wrong positioned buildings as well
This video shows how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132695587
Rainero (2023-03-05 15:46:36+00:00): Hallo DaDü,

da ist was schiefgegangen, die Weide gibt's nun doppelt:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147198834  
und  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147200549

Servus,
Rainer
Rainero (2023-03-18 18:13:07+00:00): Schade, keine Antwort. Ich habe die doppelte Wiese bereinigt.
DaDü (2023-03-21 17:13:17+00:00): Oh entschuldige bitte Rainer ich hatte die Nachricht übersehen. JOSM hatte da ein Problem beim upload ich Dachte der erste Upload habe nicht stattgefunden. Danke fürs korrigieren !
Rainero (2023-03-21 20:31:33+00:00): KeinProblem. Danke für die Rückmeldung! Dann ist die Ursache auch klar; ich finde es beruhigend, wenn man weiß, woran es lag.  
Servus,
Rainer
Frans S (2023-03-06 12:48:04+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings not accurate mapped
Rectangular buildings are often not squared. 



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132695919
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-17 23:14:07+00:00): Thanks for the detailed changeset.  I agree!  Good catch - still trying to clean up after some map vandalism.  Welcome to OSM, see you around.  You should join the discord!  :D
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132695990
rowcherryrow (2023-02-21 16:19:54+00:00): Correction: Sources used were Bing aerial imagery; Mapillary
goedegazelle (2023-02-18 08:08:18+00:00): Het is beter om wanneer een pad is getagd als "path" om er dan geen "footway" van te maken. Dat paadje rond het voetbalveld zal vaak worden gebruikt door jongeren die daar met de brommer komen, dus dat is beslist geen wandelpad. Er staat ook nergens aangegeven dat het een wandelpad is en het was daarom expres op deze manier op de kaart gezet. Tenzij de situatie is veranderd.
felipeeugenio (2023-02-17 22:47:37+00:00): Hola. Un parking the building:levels=2?
Qué quizo expresar?
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132696276
MadelNL (2023-02-23 17:24:33+00:00): Had ik iets vern..kt? ;)