piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-02-13 07:03:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13551154558 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Yacht broker office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-22 05:33:41+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178885359
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Frans S (2026-04-17 13:18:26+00:00): On this task, the high-rise buildings are often incorrectly mapped.
You can see both one or more side walls and the roof. The imagery is taken under a certain angle, so you can see more .
Often all visible walls and roofs are mapped as 1 building.
The correct way is to map the roofline and move the whole object on their footprint.

See this video.
For buildings with a few floors, start watching from position 1 minute. 
https://youtu.be/Tpi-BTMVo1M
https://youtu.be/dsfUcslLtVc?si=bEHwRl1sxDI_GA0H
Hello, thanks for mapping.
MichS (2026-02-20 05:57:13+00:00): Hallo,

eine Frage zur Beschilderung. Welche VZ sind am Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55761127#map=17/49.522778/7.332933 aufgestellt?

MFG
Sieva (2026-02-14 17:34:07+00:00): The land was redeveloped, buildings have different addresses now.
Sieva (2026-02-14 17:36:53+00:00): sorry, wrong changeset! nvm
Drewarner (2026-02-13 08:25:50+00:00): #mapbox_missing_roads
ZioDragon (2026-02-25 09:38:55+00:00): Trên thực tế nút giao không ký tự bằng số, vui lòng đặt tên theo thực tế
NeisBot (2026-02-13 08:00:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 20 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1075336210 v4 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1059172995 v1 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1059172994 v1 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/9862267378 v2
https://osm.org/node/9862267377 v2
https://osm.org/node/12964210834 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178490773
Jakka (2026-02-13 11:12:47+00:00): le nom du highway est nom officiel ? panneau . Plus accès véhicule ?
P_arnaud (2026-02-13 11:16:56+00:00): Non plus aucun accès voiture, plus de passage possible.
juminet (2026-02-14 10:28:53+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM!

Bravo pour votre première contribution! Mais celle-ci comporte une erreur ;-). Vous avez ajouté la collégiale St-Pierre sur un noeud (= un point). Mais la collégiale est djà bien là: représentée par le batiment avec tous les tags requis (place_of_worship, religion, name, ...). 

Pouvez-vous donc supprimer le point que vous avez ajouté?

Bonne continuation, 
juminet
später77 (2026-03-07 07:34:39+00:00): Az ösvény létezik, rendszeresen használod.
Soós Péter (2026-03-07 09:00:58+00:00): Akkor szerinted miért szedtem le? Maradjon már valami romantika a Zemplénben. Kirakhatod, lehet 2 év múlva már jelzés lesz, aztán szemét és tömeg. Kell ez?
qstep (2026-03-07 13:28:44+00:00): Ez gatekeeping. Az OSM-en azt visszük fel, ami létezik, jól látható a terepen. Nem releváns, hogy hányan találnak oda, milyen eszközzel, vagy mire használják fel ezt az adatot. Ha ez az ösvény és a kilátás ott van, akkor OSM-en a helye.

Szerkesztéseid között még egy olyat találtam, (ennek egy beszédes "." leírást adtál), ahol töröltél egy műholdról is jól látható ösvényt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119197953

Mindkettőt visszavontam itt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179492531

Egyéb kontribúcióid természetesen köszönjük!
qstep (2026-03-07 14:44:09+00:00): Na, kis levelezés után volt itt egy félreértésem, de még mindig nem tiszta a kép:

@später77 januárban felvitte, rendszeresen használja. Soós Péter szerint a szűz erdő van ott, semmi jelölés. 

Néhány fénykép segítene eldönteni az igazságot. 

Az OSM egyébként megengedi nagyon rossz, szinte járhatatlan, de emberek által mégis használt, vagy régebben használt "utak" felvitelét: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Talaj%C3%BAt

Rátok bízom.
TinPetreković (2026-02-13 08:08:52+00:00): The tag that was placed on the node accidentally has been removed in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178491114
Jean-Louis Stanus (2026-02-16 10:40:55+00:00): Hello Lucie, es-tu certaine du tracé et du parking entre rue de l'artisanat et avenue de heros leuzois.
La forme et l'emplacement me semblent étranges.
As-tu un document qui formalise la construction de cette nouvelle voie?
eggie (2026-02-13 08:47:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Voor een fietsreparatiezuil is een speciale tag. Zie Wiki.
Ook hoort zo'n punt niet opgenomen te worden in de routerelaties. 

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-13 08:51:46+00:00): Het punt heb ik nu uit de relaties gehaald
eggie (2026-02-13 08:53:58+00:00): amenity=bicycle_repair_station toegevoegd.
Dat kan op fietskaarten ook een symbool opleveren.
eggie (2026-02-13 08:56:31+00:00): Kijk even hier wat je nog kunt toevoegen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbicycle_repair_station

Svp niet lid maken van de fietsroutes. 

Succes,
eggie
Jakka (2026-02-13 10:59:25+00:00): les heures ouvertures pas conforme avec wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
ajxm (2026-02-22 08:34:37+00:00): The name of this hill is Bukit Bay Route (previously Bukit Beirut) (source: local knowledge+survey(there is a sign by MBK at the top of this hill). Bukit Ubi is only a name used to indicate the opposite side of this hill.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-13 08:41:06+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7391809190
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375590323
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/790675907

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Jakka (2026-02-13 10:57:01+00:00): Les heures ouvertures pas conforme avec wiki. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
gabro00 (2026-02-13 12:50:58+00:00): Hello! The Szeged orthophoto is almost 15 years old, and the physical landscape has changed since then. In fact, the map was correct; now, however, it shows a service way that no longer exists. I suggest removing way 1477378238 or completely reverting the changeset.
grzegorz75jan (2026-02-13 11:32:20+00:00): Nie ma potrzeby dodawania adresu do punktów POI w tym przypadku Kiosku, drogerii oraz po sąsiedzku poczty i cukierni jeżeli adres jest taki sam jak ten zawarty w obrysie budynku w którym znajdują się te POI.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178492292
eggie (2026-02-13 09:02:41+00:00): Hoi,
sport = equestrian  ?

MVG
eggie
literan (2026-03-06 06:26:58+00:00): тег leisure=nature_reserve предназначен для заповедников. Ульяновский лесопарк таковым не является. исправлю.
eggie (2026-02-14 09:19:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-14 09:22:15+00:00): foot en bicycle=yes zijn eigenlijk default en hoef je niet te taggen. Vreemd dat het hier op =no stond.
Gr eggie
minesfiji (2026-02-14 09:44:32+00:00): Moet ik de tag verwijderen in plaats van wijzigen?
eggie (2026-02-14 09:50:24+00:00): Kwaad kan het allemaal niet.
Die regels bicycle en foot  gewoon verwijderen kan natuurlijk wel. 
mapse,
eggie
grzegorz75jan (2026-02-13 11:39:56+00:00): Jeżeli dodajesz parking to staraj się określić rodzaj parkingu np. na powierzchni, przy drodze oraz parę innych informacji. O tagowaniu parkingów masz informacje w dokumentacji na Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity=parking choć i tak dobrze, że coś dodajesz i jesteś początkujący. W każdym razie Wiki to podstawa a czasem warto też zerknąć na jej angielską wersję.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178492797
wirabdillah (2026-03-04 11:36:21+00:00): This changeset make the road inaccessible. Is it intended? As far as I know this road is still in use
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-13 09:31:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13551360426

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Yasmina Bendik (2026-02-13 09:38:20+00:00): *Erratum : ZONE 30
EleGlobe (2026-02-13 09:57:54+00:00): Also removed old Bus Route that was previously Route 13 Napier =>Napier (via Taradale and Taradale) before the new Bus Route Changes.
NeisBot (2026-02-13 10:06:36+00:00): 🌍 Benvenuto su OSM, M_Sorre.
Grazie per aver contribuito!

Per rendere più facile la collaborazione e aiutare gli altri a capire le tue modifiche, è meglio aggiungere una breve descrizione delle modifiche che hai apportato. I commenti chiari aiutano la comunità a seguire il tuo lavoro e a fornire un feedback migliore. Puoi trovare suggerimenti su come scrivere buoni commenti qui[1].

✅ Ecco un esempio di commento basato sulle tue modifiche alla mappa: "Aggiunto attributo di anello di svolta autostradale"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, M_Sorre.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added turning loop highway attribute"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
darkonus (2026-02-15 09:29:21+00:00): Вітаю у проєкті! 

Раді бачити вас серед маперів. Було б чудово, якби ви додали народні назви кутків або мікрорайонів, якщо знаєте такі.

Такі об’єкти можна додавати як «Житловий масив» (точкою). Дякую за ваш внесок!
Hightide10 (2026-02-13 21:53:31+00:00): Hi Gaung Tebono,

I noticed some recent classification changes to secondary around the Ngawi area (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1565413690) that I wanted to get some insight on. For example roads (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151571138 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675342640) were upgraded to secondary, but seem better suited to their previous residential classification. The OSM Wiki describes secondary roads as highways that “are not part of major routes, but nevertheless form a link in the national route network.”(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary). Guidelines for the residential classification note that “Most traffic on a residential road will be for the access to residential properties. Roads carrying primarily through traffic, or non-residential traffic, should be tagged with a different highway tag” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dresidential).

The Indonesian tagging guidelines for roads further clarifies that secondary roads are to connect "one district to another” and tertiary roads are described as "Roads between villages (desa) outside urban areas. Usually legally classified as Primary Local Roads." (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines#Roads).

Based on the apparent function and connectivity of the roads in quetion, and considering the overall road hierarchy in the area, they seem to align more closely with residential, tertiary, or possibly unclassified. Would you be open to reconsidering and potentially restoring these roads to their previous classification?

Thank you for your time and I look forward to hearing from you!
FajrAl (2026-02-27 21:43:26+00:00): I think it’s just a newbie mistake. Even though the DWG sent a warning, his edits weren't reverted. Since he hasn't replied to the two discussions yet, and as a rule of thumb for Indonesian threads, it would be helpful to include an Indonesian translation alongside the English.

Saya rasa ini hanya kesalahan pemula. Meskipun DWG sudah mengirimkan pesan peringatan,  suntingannya belum dibalikkan (revert). Semenjak dia belum membalas dua diskusi yang ada; sebagai saran diskusi di Indonesia, akan sangat baik jika ditambahkan terjemahan bahasa Indonesia di samping bahasa Inggris
Hightide10 (2026-02-27 22:56:29+00:00): Hi FajrAl, thank you for the message and guidance.

Hai FajrAl, terima kasih atas pesan dan bimbingannya.
Hightide10 (2026-02-27 22:56:53+00:00): Hai Gaung Tebono,

Saya memperhatikan beberapa perubahan klasifikasi baru-baru ini pada jalan sekunder di sekitar area Ngawi (node/1565413690) yang ingin saya ketahui lebih lanjut. Misalnya, jalan (way/151571138 dan way/675342640) ditingkatkan menjadi jalan sekunder, tetapi tampaknya lebih cocok dengan klasifikasi perumahan sebelumnya. Wiki OSM mendeskripsikan jalan sekunder sebagai jalan raya yang “bukan bagian dari rute utama, tetapi tetap membentuk penghubung dalam jaringan jalan nasional.” (jalan raya = sekunder). Pedoman untuk klasifikasi perumahan mencatat bahwa “Sebagian besar lalu lintas di jalan perumahan akan untuk akses ke properti perumahan. Jalan yang terutama membawa lalu lintas lintas, atau lalu lintas non-perumahan, harus diberi tag jalan raya yang berbeda” (jalan raya = perumahan).

Pedoman penandaan jalan di Indonesia lebih lanjut mengklarifikasi bahwa jalan sekunder dimaksudkan untuk menghubungkan “satu distrik ke distrik lain” dan jalan tersier digambarkan sebagai “Jalan antar desa di luar daerah perkotaan. Biasanya secara hukum diklasifikasikan sebagai Jalan Lokal Utama.” (osm.wiki/Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines#Roads).

Berdasarkan fungsi dan konektivitas jalan-jalan yang dimaksud, dan mempertimbangkan hierarki jalan secara keseluruhan di area tersebut, jalan-jalan tersebut tampaknya lebih sesuai dengan jalan perumahan, jalan sektor tersier, atau mungkin jalan yang tidak terklasifikasi. Apakah Anda bersedia mempertimbangkan kembali dan berpotensi mengembalikan jalan-jalan ini ke klasifikasi sebelumnya?

Terima kasih atas waktu Anda dan saya menantikan tanggapan Anda!
Totor (2026-02-19 04:16:59+00:00): Hi Deco Bernat,
Great you are contributing to Openstreetmap. All help is very welcome.
I noticed you added 3 hardware stores, but all all in weird locations.
Vis-min marketing seems to be a motorcycle part store and not a hardware store.
Also it seems it is located closer to pier 3. 
Are you sure this is correct?
If you need help, let me know.
NeisBot (2026-02-13 10:27:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 23 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/656544027 v3 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/656544028 v9 | 8 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/6150076885 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178496661
NeisReview (2026-02-22 05:33:47+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178756287
Supaplex (2026-02-14 07:42:18+00:00): 郭怡美書店Kuo's Astral Bookshop 
台北市大同區迪化街一段129 號
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178496811
NeisBot (2026-02-13 10:39:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13551480903 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Women's salon"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-22 05:33:41+00:00): 🗑️🤖 Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/178885361

 If you believe this deletion was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-12 16:48:50+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179763310
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-12 16:49:26+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179763310
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-12 16:51:24+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179763357
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-12 16:52:45+00:00): Hi Pikse,

I’m not sure what’s going on here, but some of your map edits seem to have been reverted after your revert.

Best regards,
Pascal
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-13 14:31:55+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179771461
Pikse (2026-03-17 09:02:56+00:00): That's a disruptive editing campaign by Ótzï fón GlüϷgor/Otzie von Glühgor, and their new sockpupper account Иван2026. I now reported it to DWG.
literan (2026-02-14 11:47:52+00:00): будки оплаты стоят на самой дороге. Здания рядом с пунктом оплаты не являются будками оплаты, на них не следует ставить тег будки оплаты
Taya_S (2026-02-19 09:46:17+00:00): Reverted test edits by user "surajTEST"

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178763098
Taya_S (2026-02-19 09:46:18+00:00): Reverted test edits by user "surajTEST"

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178763098
StC (2026-02-13 21:47:51+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Avez-vous pu regarder par où passe l'itinéraire désormais ?
RandomMapper2 (2026-02-16 12:44:01+00:00): Bonjour,

Non malheureusement. Je ne sais pas du tout si il a été supprimé ou simplement déplacé.
eggie (2026-02-13 11:39:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Meestal zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van eenrichtingsverkeer.
Dan voegen we oneway:bicycle=no toe en ook evt voor mofa en moped.
Is dat hier het geval?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-13 11:46:31+00:00): Voorlopig als bovenstaand aangepast.
Groet
eggie
lyctkel (2026-02-25 17:55:56+00:00): Hi mbyte,
bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3722714277
hast Du für recycling:glass bottles:colour als Werte white;green angegeben.
Ich nehme an, hier wird transparentes, klares Flaschenglas gesammelt.
In diesem Fall hat sich clear;green etabliert. (Siehe https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rfc-tagging-glass-recycling/101011). Es gibt (noch) kein Wiki, aber white bedeutet weißes, nicht transparentes Glas.
Viele Grüße aus Süd-Holland,
lyctkel
mbyte (2026-02-25 20:49:37+00:00): Hallo lyctkel,
Vor Ort am Container steht Weiß Glas, somit sehe ich keine Notwendigkeit das zu ändern
lyctkel (2026-02-25 21:20:53+00:00): Hi mbyte,
in der angegebenen Dsikussion wurde das Thema diskutiert und die überwiegende Meinung war, im Falle von Weißglas oder white glass recycling:glass:color-clear zu verwenden.
Die Diskussion wurde dort von mir am  12.10.2024 zusammengefasst. 
Viele Grüße,
lyctkel
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-07-15 17:27:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 185798781 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fiction added in error by OSMNAXA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20923
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-07-15 17:27:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 185798781 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fiction added in error by OSMNAXA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20923
coteyka (2026-03-25 13:56:17+00:00): Вы продолжаете делать ошибочные правки, в виде добавления дубликатов объектов и выставления описательных имён. Прочитайте свои личные сообщения!
mueschel (2026-02-21 11:13:07+00:00): Hi,
"crossing:markings:colour:bicycle" is not used in other places. 

What is in use on other "mixed" crossings are these tags:
cycleway:crossing:markings:colour
footway:crossing:markings:colour

Could you check that?
kitto33 (2026-02-21 14:06:09+00:00): Thanks, I will change my tagging to match.
kitto33 (2026-02-21 14:17:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178861244
literan (2026-02-14 11:00:11+00:00): но зачем со здания поликлиники удалять тег building, и зачем дублировать клинику госпиталем по ограде?
NeisBot (2026-02-13 11:39:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/413491234 v5 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/380154960 v12 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/941566801 v2 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/4148041517 v5
https://osm.org/node/8719442209 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178499598
VLD0251 (2026-02-16 19:00:20+00:00): Hello! thanks for your contributions, the pitch has the same name as the stadium (leisure=stadium) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1368373354

Generally, only the stadium should have the official name.

Please remove the tag name from the pitch unless it is a distinct and verifiable name.

Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178499765
سامي ايت علي ولحسن (2026-02-19 16:51:37+00:00): Done, thank you for the feedback.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178499765
Bienson (2026-02-14 17:23:55+00:00): In Deutschland sollen ausschließlich Naturschutzgebiete (NSG) nach dem Bundesnaturschutzgesetz § 23 mit leisure=nature_reserve getaggt werden.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dnature_reserve

Korrekter Tag:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area

Außerdem sind Namen keine Beschreibungen. "Geschützter Landschaftsbestandteil" ist nicht der Name dieses Areals. Wahrscheinlich wird es gar keinen Namen geben.
Stattdessen wäre ref=LB-025 korrekt nach https://www.dortmund.de/dortmund/projekte/rathaus/verwaltung/umweltamt/downloads/natur-und-landschaft/baumschutz/festsetzungskarte_uebersicht.pdf
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-02-15 13:20:06+00:00): Ich hoffe, so ist es nun richtig.