piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2023-12-01 15:23:35+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144636012
MxxCon (2023-12-01 05:10:42+00:00): Hello.
Please split sidewalks on each street corner to allow individual tagging for each street. A single block shouldn't be mapped with just 1 sidewalk way.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144636192
osmoj (2023-12-02 03:16:19+00:00): Fixed up in changeset/144680397 [1]

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144680397
Nakaner (2023-12-01 12:59:24+00:00): Hallo,

gemeinsam mit mindestens einem anderen Benutzer hast du kürzlich u.a. bei zahlreichen Polizeidienststellen alternative bzw. abgekürzte Schreibweisen ergänzt.

Da deine Tätigkeit auffällig ist, möchte ich dich auf die hierfür geltenden Regeln für organisierte Bearbeitungen hinweisen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Organised_Editing_Guidelines

Wann und auf welchem Kommunikationskanal fand die Diskussion mit der OSM-Community statt?

Ferner sei darauf hingewiesen, dass es in einem Gemeinschaftsprojekt wie OSM zum guten Ton, beim Hochladen aussagekräftige Änderungssatzkommentare anzugeben. "Update" ist das nicht, denn damit haben die Beiträge nach grober Durchsicht nichts zu tun. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Viele Grüße

Michael
user_722019 (2023-12-03 16:10:33+00:00): Genauso wie hier von Nakaner der Anspruch erhoben wird, dass organisierte mitwirkende sich deklariert, sollte daraufhingewiesen werden dass es sich bei Nakaner um einen Mitarbeiter der nach Eigendefinition kommerziell arbeitenden Firma Geofabrik Deutschland handelt. Es ist bei der Leitstelle Tirol bekannt, wer diese finanziert. Die Firma Geofabrik lässt uns hingegen hierzu im Dunkeln. Nakaner könntest Du uns bitte erklären, ob deine Tätigkeit hier rein ehrenamtlich erfolgt. Wenn Nein was treibt Dich und deine Firma an, in Österreich tätig zu sein.
cserpell (2023-12-02 23:10:06+00:00): Estimado, volvió a abrir? Antes estaba en otro lugar una escuela especial con el mismo nombre.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144637051
IMAN SELEMAN (2023-11-30 19:16:44+00:00): i added some buildings
Dodko (2023-12-03 20:20:06+00:00): Dom smútku potrebuje značku https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuneral_hall inak to aplikácie nevedia zobraziť.
Dodko (2023-12-03 20:27:26+00:00): Treba dávať pozor a nepresúvať potok https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8636826837/history
Filip009 (2023-12-02 13:59:43+00:00): Zdravím, vďaka za prispievanie do OpenStreetMap.

Zdravím, pri všetkých tých pomenovaniach budovy je vhodné budove aj pridať tagy, tak aby aj niekto na druhej strane vedel, že sa jedná o školu a podobne. vľavo hore sa nachádza "Typ objektu", ktorý je vhodné nastaviť ako škola a pod. Tým pádom sa na viacerých mapách začnú zobrazovať aj ikonky k týmto objektom.

Pokiaľ máš nejaké otázky, neváhaj sa opýtať slovenskej OSM komunity https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk.
RicoElectrico (2023-12-01 11:50:37+00:00): Dzięki! :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-03 09:20:31+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223714664/history has building:part = 14951 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
eggie (2023-11-30 20:55:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
rtwbike (2023-12-01 13:05:46+00:00): I think you may have mistakenly added a crossing between Featherbank Grove and Stoney Lane on Broadway. There is a new traffic light crossing just to the east of the junction between Featherbank Lane and Broadway.
Arthtoach (2023-12-01 19:39:36+00:00): Thanks for spotting this, my mistake.
Arthtoach (2023-12-01 19:39:44+00:00): I've fixed this.
danieldegroot2 (2025-04-20 21:40:27+00:00): Ref https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4493019

By changing the building outlines to building parts, there is no longer any building outline. As such no building will be displayed by (most) rendering applications.

Please resolve this as appropriate and comment on this changeset when you are done.
( note to other mappers: see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/googlenaut/blocks as to why user is being actively recommended to comment here.)

If you need any help, contact the local community at
https://openstreetmap.community/?map=-33.86434,151.20266&zoom=7.98
mcliquid (2023-12-01 08:16:31+00:00): Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area - in StreetComplete, press Upload when before traveling.

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-30 20:02:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/793437870

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Piotr Strębski (2023-11-30 22:14:48+00:00): poprawione, dzieki!
user_5359 (2023-12-16 07:13:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/202567533. What is the mean of the tags 
Bairro = Barro Vermelho
Endereço = Rua Lúcio Tomé Feteira, 1888
pavimentos = 2
?

Bem-vindo ao OSM! Dê uma olhada em https://www.osm.org/way/202567533. Qual é a média das tags 
Bairro = Barro Vermelho
Endereço = Rua Lúcio Tomé Feteira, 1888
pavimentos = 2
?
englu (2023-12-04 10:15:48+00:00): Czy na węźle https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1890526630 i na drodze https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/132577480 jest dostęp dla pieszych?
zuicz (2023-12-06 05:01:24+00:00): Nie wiem, ja szedłem tym nowym tunelem i nie było widać tej bramy
zuicz (2023-12-06 19:30:52+00:00): Chociaż brama z access=no dodanym 6 lat temu może budzić pewne wątpliwości
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-02 10:56:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/401920965/history

shop=stationary? have you meant shop=stationery ?

If yes, I fixed it, if no: let me know what you meant
Frans S (2023-12-05 14:58:24+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Please map Buildings more accurate.( follow the rooflines precisely) 
Buildings not squared.
Included shadows of the building into your mapping


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144640050
carfog81 (2024-06-26 19:33:07+00:00): Todo no es un humedal, no es el predio Lisbran
Javierpf (2023-12-01 12:30:07+00:00): Hola Vicente, la ruta tiene el separador New Jersey al medio, y no un espacio verde al medio como las autopistas. Así que cambié la clasificación de acuerdo a la guía de la wiki de Argentina. Saludos
NorthCrab (2023-11-30 21:31:14+00:00): The US country geometry is broken
Baloo Uriza (2023-12-01 21:43:21+00:00): name= should probably be description= instead.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144640805
IronFixXxeR (2023-12-02 00:12:17+00:00): Thanks. I agree. Have updated the 4 I've added.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-30 21:50:45+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2950015592
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2950016310
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2950022715

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
vasony (2023-12-01 12:41:50+00:00): Szia!

Letörölted a GLS csomagpontokat, anélkül hogy felvetted volna címkéit más boltra.
Mi az oka? nem léteznek ezek a boltok?

Tamás
Spush (2023-12-01 13:02:26+00:00): Boltok vannak de ott nincsenek automaták és az import során automata ként kerültek az adatbázisba. A boltok melyek csomagpontként üzemelnek ott a bolt notes tagja tartalmazza az infót.
vasony (2023-12-01 14:18:55+00:00): pl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11350894527/history

Ez nem automatakent volt már fent a törlés pillanatában,  és nem kerültek át  a címkék a boltra. A notes cimke a  szerkesztőknek való információ, nem strukturált, a végfelhasználónak alkalmatlan. A csomagpont helyes címkézését a törölt pontban látod. shop=yes kivételével.
Spush (2023-12-02 17:24:12+00:00): A JOSM-ben még akkor töröltem, mikor automataként volt fent az adatbázisban, csak a a módosításcsomagot hó végén szoktam feltölteni.
vasony (2023-12-03 19:56:14+00:00): OK. Érdekes, hogy nem adott ütközést ilyen esetben, szerintem kellett volna.
limes11 (2023-12-01 09:42:37+00:00): Moin. 

Ist das der Eigenname oder deine persönliche Einschätzung dieser Skulptur? Und wieso sollte vorab reserviert werden?

VG Limes
Samaer (2023-12-04 00:06:49+00:00): Hi,
"Fragwürdige Kunst" ist der Name, unter dem ich die Skulptur kenne.
Zitat aus der Beschreibung für name: "Der Hauptname: im Allgemeinen der gebräuchlichste oder am deutlichsten ausgeschilderte Name in der Landessprache"
Nach meiner Einschätzung ist das der gebräuchlichste Name für diese Skulptur.
Worauf beziehst du dich mit der Vorab-Reservierung?
Vg Samaer
limes11 (2023-12-04 09:51:11+00:00): Moin, 

deine Änderung kam zeitgleich mit 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4010185

Dachte, das käme auch von dir oder hätte zumindest mit deiner Anpassung zu tun.

'name' muss kein offizieller Name der Figur sein, sollte das Objekt aber in vernünftigem Ausmaß spezifizieren. Wenn man im hiesigen Umfeld von "Fragwürdige Kunst" spricht, wissen dann die Leute, was gemeint ist? (Es reicht nicht, wenn es lediglich dir unter diesem Namen bekannt ist.)

Viele Grüße
Jose Luis Infante (2023-11-30 22:09:54+00:00): Hola,
la tienda no hay que colocarla en la vía. Es mejor colocarla en el interior del edificio donde esté. Puedes aportar más información aparte del nombre, como la etiqueta que indica que es una tienda de vinos. Con solo el nombre no aparecerá en el mapa. Puedes informar más cosas, como los datos de contacto.
Un saludo!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144641682
bigopenmac (2025-05-14 15:39:49+00:00): Единственный во всем областном Витебске  почтовый ящик, добавленный с полными данными и это за полтора года. Спасибо тебе! Жаль что ты в этот город не чаще ездишь, от местных вообще нет активности.
gezelick (2025-05-14 15:58:07+00:00): Спасибо большое за добрые слова:) 
Жаль, конечно, что Витебское комьюнити не проявляет инициативы к нашему общему делу
eggie (2023-12-01 11:19:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Udarian (2023-11-30 22:06:28+00:00): while some of the changes made in 143992462 are correct it made two mistakes, the first being the removal of way 1178243253 which is there on the latest imagery and can be seen on the Bing street side available in iD.and as for the sidewalks I reverted the ones that I did because bicycle=Not Specified is non standard and from what I can tell from taginfo the ways that this commit added it to are the only occurrences globally. this tag from what I can tell adds nothing since unless otherwise specified it is implied that bicycles are allowed to use sidewalks (or any other pedestrian use) so bicycle=Not Specified and bicycle=yes mean the same thing and bicycle=yes is standardso it should be used. I also left multiple comments on the commit asking for clarification and the commiter was unresponsive providing no evidence that way 1178243253  was removed so I have to assume that was a mistake becuase bassed on the other vaialbe street side and satalite imagery this road seems to hav been added within the last few years so it would make no sense for it to have been removed so quickly. 

(could not fit the complete explanation in the change set comment so adding here)
Frans S (2023-12-01 15:22:13+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144641896
supersellout6907 (2023-12-01 13:26:05+00:00): The Hawthorne plaza shouldnt be referred to as abandoned in the name, you should add the abandoned tag to it. You also shouldnt apply that name tag to every building in the area
Baloo Uriza (2023-12-01 21:44:21+00:00): Smaller edits with descriptive changeset notes would be appreciated.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144641946
MxxCon (2023-12-01 05:15:45+00:00): Hello.
Please map each crosswalk as individual way to allow for independent tagging of each one. Additionally, tagging curb cuts, where visible, is highly encouraged.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144642042
tyfi (2023-11-30 22:25:57+00:00): This was previously ref'd as Z, but open MoDOT data and Bing StreetSide disagreed. I have corrected this.
tyfi (2023-11-30 23:41:39+00:00): Bounding box is large due to very long power line.
citrula (2023-12-01 00:52:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The numerical part of the address does not go in addr:street. I went ahead and corrected that for you in this changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144644493
 Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144642380
Motive Inc (2023-12-01 01:29:54+00:00): Thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144642380
BlueButterfly (2023-11-30 22:47:00+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Bing Streetside
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-30 22:50:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227900067
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227900071

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
landry (2024-02-12 19:03:40+00:00): hello, was there a link to an official document for this closure ? been there today, this part of the TF-6 path is accessible to good hikers who are not afraid about heights.
d3k0 (2024-02-12 20:16:28+00:00): Hi, there was a sign forbidding access to this trail. Maybe the trail was repaired and is opened again.
landry (2024-02-12 21:10:33+00:00): Oh, the sign was still there at the el draguillo bridge (no sign near faro de anaga), but the path is accessible (and wonderful! :)

was mostly wondering if you had an 'official' stance on the path, i haven't been able to find one.
landry (2024-02-12 21:18:35+00:00): i've found https://reservabiosfera.tenerife.es/descubre-anaga/senderos/ which states that this part of TF-6 is indeed closed. Still, beautiful !
streckenkundler (2023-12-01 14:11:49+00:00): Auch hier ist wenig sinnvolles bei rausgekommen: Unnützes description, Verschlechterung der Daten wegen falscher Flächenzusammenfassung... und wieder ein Honey-Pot...
Olaf der Mapper (2023-12-01 22:56:54+00:00): Witzig, da die Datenmodellierung hier rein auf OSM-Bestandsdaten beruht. Wer da wohl in der Vergangenheit gepfuscht hat😁?  LG Olaf
tyfi (2023-11-30 23:35:27+00:00): Large bbox due to state route relation.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-12-01 15:08:11+00:00): Technically not forbidden for pedestrian though. I have put use_sidepath so routing engines do not route pedestrian on the road, but there is no sign prohibitting pedestrian to walk there.
SbGagne (2023-12-01 18:38:50+00:00): There is literally no sidepaths in the "inner" ring. Pedestrian should use the side roads (the light yellow ones) where there is a sidepath or the sidepaths that are explicitely there.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-12-01 18:44:39+00:00): Yes I understand, that's why I put use_sidepath on the whole roundabout. foot=no means it is forbidden by law, which it is not. Only motorways in Quebec are forbidden to foot/bicycle traffic.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-12-01 19:34:36+00:00): It does not change a thing for me and for routing, but someone later on may change it back to use_sidepath for the reason that is is not forbidden. See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:foot%3Dno
Pooh01 (2023-12-21 21:59:18+00:00): Budowana stacja paliw BP znajduje się bardziej na wschód. Budowy McDonalds nie ma na dostępnych podkładach. Usunąłem błędne nazwy.
DressyPear4 (2023-12-04 23:19:40+00:00): Não é permitido usar o google como fonte de dados
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144644496
i2004 (2023-12-01 01:20:05+00:00): http://www.portalunoargentina.com.ar/contenidosver.asp?id=33858&sid=6 cambios en el recorrido de la 333
AgusQui (2023-12-01 02:13:29+00:00): Básicamente lo dividieron en 2 ramales no?
i2004 (2023-12-01 02:15:08+00:00): si
i2004 (2023-12-01 02:17:41+00:00): por otro lado te paso informacion de la 34 aeroparque https://www.revistacolectibondi.com.ar/2023/11/30/la-linea-34-ya-llega-hasta-aeroparque/
BCNorwich (2023-12-01 09:15:30+00:00): duplicate removed
MxxCon (2023-12-01 05:22:34+00:00): Hello.
What is the meaning of cover=y tag?
What is the meaning of tag flux=*? This is not a documented tag.
Also light_colour= and light_temperature= are not documented tags. Where are they coming from? Where are you getting these values from?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144644750
MxxCon (2023-12-01 05:24:41+00:00): Additionally, on some features you added operator=dot tag. As documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(don't_do_it) and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations names should NOT be abbreviated, but fully spelled out.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144644750
BCNorwich (2023-12-01 09:19:26+00:00): Hi, Building heights are in meters. I don't think this is 75M tall if there are only 2 floors
BCNorwich (2023-12-01 09:11:41+00:00): Fiction names removed.
ph_8 (2023-12-01 01:48:02+00:00): It looks like I may have edited the entire Lake George Wild Forest rather than the small part I meant to edit. I don't know how to undo this change...?
TomPar (2023-12-03 04:29:39+00:00): I reverted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144710212
BCNorwich (2023-12-01 09:04:52+00:00): Duplicated roads removed.
arjunaraoc (2023-12-15 10:31:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia) Please follow naming guidelines at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names  as much as possible. i have update vide https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145144783
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144645181
stillhart (2026-03-29 13:03:16+00:00): 🎉
KelsonV (2023-12-05 00:25:48+00:00): Hello! Thanks for improving the map around Temecula! I hope you don't mind, but I wanted to make a couple of suggestions for future mapping.

1. Doors should usually be mapped as part of the wall they go through, and tagged as entrance=yes (or main, or a more specific value if one's appropriate).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:door

I'm not 100% sure what the best way is to label a door leads to, say, a closet, though - maybe "entrance=yes" with "access=private"?

2. The name field should only be used for names, not descriptions. When there's an appropriate tag or tag combination, that's always better than a free-form description, so the fire alarm and door points don't really need the name tags.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name

Thanks again for mapping!
Nakaner (2023-12-01 13:00:43+00:00): Hallo,

gemeinsam mit mindestens einem anderen Benutzer hast du kürzlich u.a. bei zahlreichen Polizeidienststellen alternative bzw. abgekürzte Schreibweisen ergänzt.

Da deine Tätigkeit auffällig ist, möchte ich dich auf die hierfür geltenden Regeln für organisierte Bearbeitungen hinweisen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Organised_Editing_Guidelines

Wann und auf welchem Kommunikationskanal fand die Diskussion mit der OSM-Community statt?

Ferner sei darauf hingewiesen, dass es in einem Gemeinschaftsprojekt wie OSM zum guten Ton, beim Hochladen aussagekräftige Änderungssatzkommentare anzugeben. "Update" ist das nicht, denn damit haben die Beiträge nach grober Durchsicht nichts zu tun. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Viele Grüße

Michael
Patinity (2023-12-01 13:21:15+00:00): Hallo Michael,
i weiß ja nicht, ob du von der Firma Leitstelle Tirol schon mal etwas gehört hast, wenn nicht, hier der Link: https://www.leitstelle.tirol/

Da wir im schönen Bundesland Tirol für die Sicherheit der Bevölkerung zuständig sind, bzw. Feuerwehr, Rettung, Bergrettung etc. entsenden, ist es für uns wichtig, dass bestimmte Alternative Namen bzw. Infos zur Verfügung stehen. Da wir die Daten von OSM nutzen, sind wir gewillt diese so exakt wie möglich zu erfassen und zu verwalten.

Änderungssatzkommentar wie "Update" sind in diesen Fällen meiner Meinung nach ausreichen, da es ja nichts anders wie "Updates" sind.

Gruß,
Patrick
user_722019 (2023-12-01 14:25:59+00:00): Genauso wie hier von Nakaner der Anspruch erhoben wird, dass organisierte mitwirkende sich deklariert, sollte daraufhingewiesen werden dass es sich bei Nakaner um einen Mitarbeiter der nach Eigendefinition kommerziell arbeitenden Firma Geofabrik Deutschland handelt. Es ist bei der Leitstelle Tirol bekannt, wer diese finanziert. Die Firma Geofabrik lässt uns hingegen hierzu im Dunkeln. Nakaner könntest Du uns bitte erklären, ob deine Tätigkeit hier rein ehrenamtlich erfolgt. Wenn Nein was treibt Dich und deine Firma an, in Österreich tätig zu sein.