piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
voschix (2023-10-15 03:39:14+00:00): Sorry about this. But I had kindly asked to freeze that operation. I was trying to update details unrelated to the big picture of how to the I1 route is organized. I had assumed you were pausig. When I tried to upload my rsther big changeset I found a conflict. You were apparently changing the relation to superroute (which may or may not be a good idea),. In orfer to save my details I had to revert your re-arrangement. 
Please stop with that intervention, until we have a better picture of what is on the ground. In particular I had corrected the on the ground detailsof the E7 relation exactly where it intersects the I1. In fact in the Regione Veneto documentation of I1 they "use" a part of the E7 that does noot carry any I1 signs (the part that goes to Lago Fimon). In addition the E7 signing on the ground takes a different course on the ground than in the official documentation. I am off for a bike tour now. Please leave things untouched there.
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2023-10-15 09:19:40+00:00): I'm sorry, I wasn't aware that you were editing the I1 object now. Where did I read over that? 
The reasoning "Please stop with that intervention, until we have a better picture of what is on the ground" is still not comprehensible to me. On the contrary, if you want to adjust the route to the signposting on the ground, the clean-up should be awaited because a) I don't change ways and b) afterwards corrections based on the signposting on the ground are easier and more reliable to make.
I assumed you accepted my argument, obviously a mistake, sorry.
I think a common point is that we should not edit the same object at the same time. I need one more day. Can you wait that long? Or how long do you need?
voschix (2023-10-15 12:13:23+00:00): Could you please first send me an OSM message ( outside the changeset discussion) describing what your "cleanup"  is. One problem I see is that your new "main" route is not obvious. Than there is the problem that we have two different routes in the web-based documentation (Veneto Strade and Regione Veneto) and  then, a third one signed on the ground. I suggest we stop both inserting data and first of all agree on what want to achieve, and then agree on how to map it. Maybe  we can chat or videoconference on WhatsApp? Not today, however. 
.
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2023-10-15 16:53:26+00:00): OK, I'll send you an OSM message with a more detailed description of my process.
I have already mentioned the source for the main route.
The 2 or more differently documented I1-routes are irrelevant to the cleanup.
Agreed, we both stop inserting data until we have a common understanding.
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2023-10-17 10:06:07+00:00): I sent you a PM on 15 October 2023 at 20:37. Please check your OSM mailbox
lyctkel (2023-11-29 20:32:29+00:00): Hi GayCookie,
this node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11261560153 ) looks a little bit odd.
You have written recycling_type=bin, but from the satellite image it looks just like the neighboring recycling containers.  
If that's right it would be recycling_type=container.

Another question, you wrote recycling:plastic=yes.
Checking the website https://arnhem.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=5233e3feb203431baf6ec9269a75039a 
I found it could be recycling:pmd=yes. Is that correct?
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Arecycling%3Apmd for details.
Further the nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11261560154 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11261370679 
look like recycling:pmd as well.

Do you agree or disagree?
Please let me know. If you don't have the time for corrections I'll do it for you.
Regards
lyctkel
GayCookie (2023-11-29 21:44:56+00:00): 1. I think this was meant to be underground too but I might have forgotten to change this.

This location does have a bin now too but I do not had the chance to add this to the map yet and will do this soon.

2. I did not know 'PMD' was an option that is why I used 'plastic' since the first P stands for Plastic in 'PMD'.
Same goes for all the other 'Plastic' locations hehe

I'll edit them tonight plus others I might have set to 'Plastic' instead of 'PMD'.
GayCookie (2023-11-29 22:15:38+00:00): So, everything should be correct now. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144605630
lyctkel (2023-11-30 13:51:24+00:00): Super, Thank you!
Allison P (2023-10-15 02:06:38+00:00): Features are marked private with access=private, not private=yes
mfimp2 (2023-12-08 20:21:41+00:00): Na geoportalu wyrysowanych dróg w budowie nie ma.
Dlatego proszę o:
1. link do mapy, z której te drogi zostaly skopiowane
2. licencję do tej mapy, która pozwala te drogi umieścić w OSM.
VictorIE (2026-01-09 10:01:48+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374824038/

fixme=Marked as 33KV line but has a number of intermediate transformers & no disconnects which seems uncommon for a 33KV - I suspect it's 11KV

I may have mentioned this before. NIE Networks do connect individual houses / farms / clusters to 33 kV if there is no 11 kV nearby. See here: https://openinframap.org/#12.89/54.12175/-6.17409 for an extreme example
NorthCrab (2023-10-14 01:10:50+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142556496
NorthCrab (2023-10-14 01:07:41+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142556385
NorthCrab (2023-10-14 01:04:25+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142556279
mcliquid (2023-10-14 07:43:49+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
NorthCrab (2023-10-14 01:00:53+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142556151
NorthCrab (2023-10-14 00:57:11+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142556002
dawekiv148 (2023-10-19 14:50:17+00:00): Free Palestine
dawekiv148 (2023-10-19 14:50:21+00:00): Free Palestine
NorthCrab (2023-10-14 00:53:32+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142555824
dawekiv148 (2023-10-19 14:50:13+00:00): Free Palestine
NorthCrab (2023-10-14 00:49:47+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142555699
dawekiv148 (2023-10-19 14:50:09+00:00): Free Palestine
NorthCrab (2023-10-14 00:46:07+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142555582
dawekiv148 (2023-10-19 14:50:06+00:00): Free Palestine
NorthCrab (2023-10-14 00:38:41+00:00): Vandalizing the map does not help in any way. It only hurts ordinary people.
NorthCrab (2023-10-14 00:42:59+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142555478
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-14 03:00:00+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/issues/27802
NorthCrab (2023-10-14 15:05:11+00:00): @Fizzie41 - 403 Forbidden, probably meant this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15163
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-14 21:36:30+00:00): Oops, wrong link! Thanks!
dawekiv148 (2023-10-19 14:49:53+00:00): Free Palestine
Famlam (2023-10-26 22:01:20+00:00): Hoi, zou je je wijzigingen van https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6887484 even kunnen controleren?

Van een weg met een gedefinieerde naam (welke ook na te zoeken is in andere bronnen), snelheid, oppervlak etc is dit ineens veranderd in een serviceweggetje zonder eigenschappen.

Waarschijnlijk was het alleen jouw bedoeling om het kleine stukje dat bij de kerk aansluit, aan te passen?
jxpsert (2023-10-26 22:04:50+00:00): Oei, dat is inderdaad zeker niet de bedoeling geweest. Ik denk dat ik daar ben vergeten de weg te splitsen. Is het oke als ik dat morgen corrigeer?
Famlam (2023-10-26 22:30:35+00:00): Zeker :). Foutjes kunnen gebeuren.
Mocht je het toevallig vergeten, pak ik 't zaterdag op.
jxpsert (2023-10-27 08:20:26+00:00): Bij deze opgelost; https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143199067
Glassman (2023-10-14 21:50:57+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142555283
nevw (2023-10-14 11:07:20+00:00): It is normally preferred that you don’t use the highway nodes to form boundaries for landuse. Leave them solely as road infrastucture. The land use does not extend to the roadway centrelines. Using roadway centreline nodes may be convenient and may the map look pretty but is not the preferred way to map.
There was an osmi error with this one tonight…
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.10405&lat=-27.50705&zoom=15
nevw (2023-10-14 11:14:22+00:00): At version #17 for the landuse boundary so has probably been the way for for a long time and use to be a common or even preferred way to map landuse but it considered not to be the preferred method now by my reading of mapper discussions.
nevw (2023-10-15 00:08:48+00:00): I added a segment to the roundabout on Winstanley Street to fix retail multipolygon that uses road segments for the landuse=retail boundary at Westfield Carindale, se Qld. Too much work to redraw without using roadway infrastructure.
nevw (2023-10-15 01:18:50+00:00): I split the roundabout instead of adding a duplicate segment and this fixed the route relations through the area too.
jmarchon (2023-10-14 05:14:55+00:00): Do not use Apple or Google street view as a source for OSM editing. Continuing to do so may get your account blocked.
Supaplex (2024-05-29 04:19:53+00:00): Revert due to it being a fake bus station

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151970013
emersonveenstra (2023-10-15 22:22:55+00:00): Hi there,

What is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11261779819 supposed to be?
emersonveenstra (2023-10-15 22:25:18+00:00): Hi,

This changeset introduced several points with no tags, such as:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11261801678
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11261801679
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11261801668
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11261801669

Could you please go back and either remove, tag, or add this points to a way or area? Thanks!
ovruni (2023-10-14 04:28:11+00:00): Hola Isabel, por favor revisa el desplazamiento que se ha indicado en la wiki junto con la tarea.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-21 10:32:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11261792185/history - is it distinct from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10941748063 ?
Hadi Omid (2023-10-14 09:13:53+00:00): سلام وقت بخیر
دلیل حذف سرعتگیرها چیه؟
CurlingMan13 (2023-10-14 19:05:28+00:00): power lines should not be connected to water bodies.  I have fixed this for you here.
cserpell (2023-10-14 14:34:55+00:00): Hola Camilo. Por favor no borrar calles que ya están dibujadas. Si es necesario cambiarle el nombre a un segmento puedes cortarlas y cambiarlo. No hay problemas con eso. Pero con lo que hiciste se pierde el historial, se perdió la geometría anterior y además se perdieron todas las señaléticas. Otra cosa es que no sé si tiene sentido agregarle nombre a las calles de servicio.

Saludos,
felipeeugenio (2023-10-15 12:39:27+00:00): Hola Camilo.
El changeset fue revertido parcialmente para restaurar todo lo que borraste dado lo que señala Cristián. Por favor tener en consideración no borrar calles. Si necesitas saber más sobre el editor que usas para aprender a cortar calles y dividirlas para renombrarlas puedes preguntar en el chat.
gracias
Camilo Nuñez Castro (2023-10-15 13:54:22+00:00): Hola, Buen día.
Asumo mi error respecto al borrar la geometría de la calle, seré más riguroso cuando se use el editor ID ya que cuando estoy en el trabajo no puedo descargar el JOSM y trabajarlo directamente desde ahí.

Ya que se revirtió parcialmente la zona restaurada, es posible saber qué lugar en específico para volver editarlo pero desde JOSM.

Saludos
felipeeugenio (2023-10-15 14:56:46+00:00): Hola. Entiendo que Juan Pablo lo que hizo fue revertirlo y luego restaurar todo. Creo que no hace falta hacer nada mas.
Después de todo los nombres de las calles estaban de acuerdo al SII, así no se reversó eso.
Camilo Nuñez Castro (2023-10-15 15:43:21+00:00): Gracias Felipe
user_11609320 (2023-10-14 06:06:50+00:00): street name change source
https://www.vvdailypress.com/story/news/local/desert-dispatch/2009/09/29/city-names-street-for-helen/37112979007/
mkopinsky (2023-10-18 15:44:43+00:00): Looking at Bing Maps Aerial  and Bing Streetside, it doesn't appear that there's a large fountain as you've mapped. I see a small round fountain (which is already on the map) with a pedestrian area around it. Is the reality something different? If I'm correct, this new fountain you added should be deleted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142562572
springlaugh (2023-10-18 20:11:58+00:00): The fountain itself is a small round one, I used the octagon to label surrounding concrete. The position of the existing fountain tag in OSM is off from the actual position of the fountain and in fact this can be seen from the aerial map as well.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142562572
osmviborg (2023-10-14 06:21:07+00:00): 👍
osmviborg (2023-10-14 07:03:08+00:00): 'wood' på veje?
LarsBG (2023-10-15 17:57:26+00:00): Øv nej det var udsigt tårn der var af træ 😀Så det var min fejl.
Marianne Jordan (2023-10-14 07:49:16+00:00): Updates: Realignment of some areas and changed some names.
user_11609320 (2023-10-14 07:30:56+00:00): future warehouses
ig4map (2023-10-14 07:28:56+00:00): This is duplicate of existing data: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11152448905

Please merge your data into existing Gagarin Cafe
Tomas Straupis (2023-10-15 09:14:00+00:00): Peržiūrėjau. Negerai perklasifikuoti keliai. Atstačiau. Negerai pakeistas tvenkinio žymėjimas - irgi atstačiau.
BCNorwich (2023-10-17 07:24:14+00:00): Hi, you forgot to square up and tag these building. I've tagged them for you.
eggie (2023-10-14 09:44:09+00:00): Dag netforce...  Het adres zal toch nog wel bestaan?
Je hebt nu alles verwijderd.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=142566711

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-10-14 09:45:14+00:00): adres hersteld
mcliquid (2023-10-14 13:30:47+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
limes11 (2023-10-14 08:52:40+00:00): Hi, 

was meinst du hier mit "access=permit" ? 

VG Limes
elias_sta (2023-10-14 12:53:43+00:00): Damit ist gemeint, das der Zutritt/Zugriff nur mit Erlaubnis/Befugnis (=permit) möglich ist.
limes11 (2023-10-14 13:01:59+00:00): Und wer hat/erhält diese Befugnis? Nur Militär? Für jeden zu haben?
silversurfer83 (2023-10-14 21:09:26+00:00): Noch ein anderer freundlicher Hinweis: Die Taste "Q" macht Objekte (bspw. Gebäude) rechtwinklig :)

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142566913
limes11 (2023-10-17 18:48:52+00:00): Nochmal: 

Wer hat/erhält diese Befugnis? Nur Militär? Für jeden zu haben?
elias_sta (2023-10-17 19:01:13+00:00): Die Lagerhalle welche sich dort befinden gehören soweit ich weiß verschieden Organisationen oder Personen AN, z. B. Der Feuerwehr, dem Hessenforst usw., die Bundeswehr benutzt diese größtenteils nicht mehr.
redrace (2023-10-17 09:02:13+00:00): 
Was wird denn hier verkauft?
Die aktuelle Firmenadresse ist St. Thomasweg 3 in Urfeld!
redrace (2023-10-17 09:04:24+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Dagrarian
mcliquid (2023-10-14 13:30:28+00:00): Danke! :)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142567214
Scout Jens (2025-07-23 13:44:50+00:00): Hallo, 
Bürgersteige bitte in der Straße vermerken. Weg: 1215532613 bringt nur fehlerhaftes Routing mit sich. Man kann (in der Realität) den Bürgersteig an fast jeder Stelle verlassen und die Straßenseite wechseln oder in eine (gegenüberliegende) Querstraße abbiegen. 
Bitte solche Kostrukte wieder löschen. Infos zu sinnvoller Kartierung findest Du auch im Wiki zu OSM
Grüße
eggie (2023-10-14 17:49:58+00:00): Dag ganesh..

Maar dat is niet wat je hebt gedaan. Je hebt een adresnode verwijderd?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-10-14 17:52:16+00:00): Adresnode 103 en 105 teruggeplaatst.
Die lagen toevallig op elkaar.
MVG
eggie
osmviborg (2023-10-14 11:00:19+00:00): oneway=yes
Jrachi (2023-10-14 16:49:25+00:00): Ricordati di aggiungere il ruolo guidepost quando aggiungi dei guidepost ad una relazione.
Bienson (2023-10-15 05:24:52+00:00): building=house ("Einfamilienhaus") bitte nur bei Reihenhäusern verwenden. Freistehende Einfamilienhäuser haben mit building=detached den besseren Tag und Doppelhaushälften, bzw. Häuser, die an 3 Seiten freistehend sind, haben mit building=semidetached_house einen besseren Tag.
Tech_Crash_3814 (2023-10-15 07:57:22+00:00): Ah OK danke jetzt weiß ich es korrekt einordnen zu können
GerdP (2023-11-03 13:45:44+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Ich gehe mal davon aus, dass es keine Absicht ist: Kannst Du bitte darauf achten, dass Du nicht landuse-Knoten mit Straßen, Wasserwegen oder sonstigen liniaren Objekten "verklebst"? Ein landuse endet ja nicht in der Mitte einer Straße oder eines Grabens, sondern irgendwo daneben.
boing (2023-11-03 15:03:43+00:00): ok, ich achte drauf
GerdP (2023-11-03 15:18:39+00:00): Danke Dir!
mcliquid (2023-10-14 12:25:48+00:00): Congratulations!
HirschKauz (2023-10-14 12:40:53+00:00): a few more drops of this drug an he will be addicted like all of us :-)
itineris (2023-10-15 18:32:42+00:00): Szia!

Légy szíves, legközelebb hasonló esetben a főút kapcsolatait is módosítsd!
https://openstreetmap.org/relation/67353

A körforgalmakat pedig a junction=roundabout címkével jelöljük.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/731595204

A Ménfőcsanak Koroncói út felhajtónál félrement néhány ág egyirányúsága.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1205215746

Üdv:
Ákos
NightH (2023-10-15 18:47:31+00:00): Szia!

Köszi, a relation teljesen kimaradt nekem fejben. A többit igyekeztem már korábban korrektül előkészíteni, sajnos van amit a renderelés után könnyebb elkapni.

Köszi a javításokat, igyekszem a jövőben jobban odafigyelni.

Üdv,
Gábor
smeòrach (2023-10-20 09:56:49+00:00): Fantastic work
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-14 13:00:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1212145639

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
tuzinsky (2023-10-14 13:00:59+00:00): Prosím, nepridávajte nepravdivé údaje. Budova nemá popisné číslo 16081 a Ružinov nie je názov miesta ale mestskej časti
Dodko (2023-10-14 13:13:32+00:00): Má takú adresu v registri adries aj v katastri na liste vlastníctva. 
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/ra_adresne_body/0/13923203?pos=48.144250,17.155536,18
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/kataster/detail/kataster/parcela-c/804274/15430_12?pos=48.144186,17.155916,18

Mestská časť sa dáva do addr:place ak adresa nemá ulicu, ak má ulicu tak do addr:suburb.
Mesto sa dáva do addr:city.
https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/8FwT4wfXTeQ/m/YKSzLX_8AwAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/YNia7EftpvU/m/IH7exkd_AQAJ
tuzinsky (2023-10-14 13:24:29+00:00): Bolo by veľmi dobré, keby sa dalo na register adries spoľahnúť, žiaľ, štátne dáta sú veľmi slabej kvality. Pracujem s nimi a je v nich veľa chýb.

Rozumiem, ale táto budova je na ulici, ktorá má názov, nemyslím si, že chýbajúce popisné číslo budovy je dostatočný dôvod na použitie addr:place miesto addr:suburb
Dodko (2023-10-14 13:32:04+00:00): Nie každá budova na ulici s názvom má pridelenú ulicu a orientačné číslo. Typicky garáže, alebo priemyselné budovy.
Táto budova má iba súpisné číslo, preto sa používa place.
Majiteľ budovy by mal požiadať mesto o pridelenie adresy s orientačným číslom a dali by im napríklad Mlynské nivy 16081/70A

Bratislava-Ružinov má 3721 adries zapísaných v registri adries bez pridelenej ulice, iba so súpisným číslom.

https://www.slov-lex.sk/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2015/125/#paragraf-2
tuzinsky (2023-10-14 14:31:36+00:00): V poriadku, ďakujem za vysvetlenie. Napriek tomu si myslím, že je dôležitejší a užitočnejší fakt, že budova sa nachádza na pomenovanej ulici, ako to, že nemá pridelený adresný bod. Špeciálne keď majiteľ budovy používa adresu vedľajšej budovy aj pre túto budovu
Dodko (2023-10-14 14:56:11+00:00): Budova má pridelený adresný bod https://i2.paste.pics/PMBYA.png

To je problém majiteľa ak používa susedovu adresu a tvári sa že je to jeho. Má riadne požiadať mesto  o pridelenie ulice a orientačného čísla a dostane takú adresu akú potrebuje.
Aj orientačné číslo 72 je voľné tak by mu mohli prideliť Mlynské nivy 16081/72 aj by to dávalo logiku keď 70 a 68 je zaradom západne.
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/ra_adresne_body/0/14385710?pos=48.144200,17.154262,19
Supaplex (2023-10-15 02:51:41+00:00): 可採用life cycle，表示前綴disused:，保留地址與無障礙設施的標示
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142575660
flohoff (2023-10-22 17:29:26+00:00): Moin,
ich habe gerade den changeset gesehen und bin nicht schlau draus geworden.

Ich hatte so das gefühl das du "zone:traffic" und "maxspeed:type" durcheinander geworfen oder verwechselt hast.

Das maxspeed:type wäre nur für die Geschwindigkeit, das zone:traffic für die anzeige ob inner oder Ausserorts (Was ja nicht nur eine Auswirkung auf den Maxspeed hat sondern auch auf Parken auf der Fahrbahn etc).

Ich hab in Gütersloh das mal flächendeckend getagged weil ich damit dann informationen für eine Simulation hatte für die Herabsetzung der Regelgeschwindigkeit (Ist ja nur innerorts, und nur wenn es zugleich maxspeed:type=DE:urban und zone:traffic=DE:urban ist)

Hier ist auf dem einen teil das maxspeed:type und auf dem anderen teil zone:traffic weggefallen. 

Und das mit dem maxspeed:forward und co ist gefühl auch durcheinander oder?

Ich vermute das um den Bahnübergang 20 ist? 

Sollte das nicht einfach ein maxspeed=20 von Schild zu Schild gelten (Gilt ja bis es aufgehoben ist oder?)

So long

Flo
Langlaeufer (2023-10-22 17:43:30+00:00): Alles dort ist außerorts also zone:traffic=DE:rural
Tempo 20 sollte jeweils bis zum Bahnübergang gelten - das es von einem Zeichen kommt, hab ich mir mal gespart zu notieren, weil das bei zone:traffic=rural eigentlich klar sein sollte. Ich schau mal ob ich irgendwelche Richtungen verwechselt habe
flohoff (2023-10-22 17:48:50+00:00): Es muss ja kein sign sein ... Könnte auch ein DE:zone20 sein

So überflüssig ist es nicht. Und die Maschine ist nicht so schlau das am Kontext erraten zu können.

Flo
Langlaeufer (2023-10-22 17:49:33+00:00): Richtung Osten gilt Tempo 10, das hatte ich wohl versehenlich gelöscht.

Ist jetzt berichtigt und ergänzt
Langlaeufer (2023-10-22 17:51:18+00:00): sorry jetzt.
Langlaeufer (2023-10-22 17:51:37+00:00): zonen gibt es nur innerorts
Langlaeufer (2023-10-22 17:59:51+00:00): In diesem Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72683524 hattest du übrigens maxspeed:type=DE:rural bei maxspeed 20 gesetzt. Das hatte meine Änderungen dort getriggert - wobei ich offensichtlich auch schon etwas unkonzentriert war.