piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BuiltforPeople (2025-02-07 00:45:54+00:00): 1. Thanks for the background on the road classification system. I'm not sure exactly which one this comment refers to, but it is noted.
2. The footpath was removed because it doesn't exist. It is correctly represented as "St. Edwards Trail" just nearby.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162185970
Glassman (2025-02-07 00:54:24+00:00): I mentioned unclassified because Lake Trask Road was changed from unclassified to residential. By looking at the imagery, Lake Trask Road looks like an unclassified to me.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162185970
BuiltforPeople (2025-02-07 01:41:29+00:00): I concur.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162185970
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-09 23:06:25+00:00): Please use proper changeset comments.
brp2pCripto (2025-02-10 00:59:25+00:00): Ok, thanks !
andygol (2025-02-06 09:35:47+00:00): Доброго дня, дякую за покращення даних на мапі. 

Зі свого боку хотів би звернути вашу увагу на те що різні супутникові знімки можуть мати різну "привʼязку" до місцевості. Докладніше про це можна подивитись тут https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Using_Imagery.

Якщо у вас виникатимуть якісь питання можете звертатись до мене чи на форум спільноти ОСМ (https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/ua/66)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162185988
Tomek | Yanosik (2025-02-07 06:32:32+00:00): Zgodnie z: https://bezpieczenstwo.chorzow.eu/location/ul-katowicka-zmiana-organizacji-ruchu na ulicy Miechowickiej wprowadzony został tymczasowo ruch dwukierunkowy. Z jakiego powodu został usunięty?
Yog Sot (2025-02-07 23:15:35+00:00): tak, zapewne faktycznie jeszcze nie ma połączenia z Katowicką, więc nie jest oneway, ale spróbuj zweryfikować czy skręcanie w lewo w 3 Maja jest zabronione
SekeRob (2025-02-06 12:27:51+00:00): Hi,

Is there now somewhere a place holder node to carry all these area tags... my overpass can't seems to find any, and Adriatic I've never heard of being a contentious name.

chrs
SekeRob repair (2025-02-06 14:19:09+00:00): OK, think I found it, in a place not expected.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4348295445

cheers

(Somehow my OverpassTurbo query looking for place=sea keeps timing out with only the Adriatic in view.)
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-05 23:31:20+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 161765743, 161765873, 161916556, 162105874, 162106847, 162106934, 162146266, 162146522, 162146978.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-31 12:50:52+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12504279151/history has landuse = 12 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
Unarmored5156 (2025-02-09 22:36:42+00:00): HI there, and welcome to OSM :)

I was going through recent changesets in the Calgary area, and came across this one.
It appears you've upgraded an alley from an alley to a residential road, when in reality this shouldn't have been changed, as alleys do not meet the definition of a residential road. I've reverted that change for you.

As well, you added a highway=pedestrian leading up to the rear of a house. highway=pedestrian has a very specific use case, whose use you can read about on its wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian. The only road meeting this definition in Calgary is Stephen Avenue, outside of some very limited specific uses. I've gone ahead and downgraded this to a highway=footway with access=private (as it leads to a private residence).
mini_ogf (2025-02-08 01:58:39+00:00): okay why is this so large
all I remember adding was some forest to rollway lake ;-;
pavvv (2025-02-06 09:33:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1139176887 powinno zostać secondary do otwarcia obwodnicy
pavvv (2025-02-06 09:34:04+00:00): nawet jest note
NeisBot (2025-02-06 10:34:30+00:00): Hi ParadoX_ZLWC, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over the last days and weeks, you've made at least 126 with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Unarmored5156 (2025-02-09 22:31:01+00:00): I also took a peek at this changeset and noted you changed the Bow River Pathway near the 12th Street Bridge to a footway. This, by default, doesn't allow bicycles. Given the entire rest of the length does allow bicycles I've gone ahead and reverted that.

As well, you removed the natural=water and water=river tags from the Bow River area multipolygon. This multipolygon delimited the area of the river itself, with ways through the river that defined water flow. I've reverted that as well.
pesticides (2025-02-06 01:02:32+00:00): It looks like the "highway" tag was accidentally removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161822967
InsertUser (2025-02-06 13:44:55+00:00): Where was the discussion for this mechanical edit?

It seems to be to match a rejected proposal.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Denomination%3Dlatter_day_saint
Unarmored5156 (2025-02-09 22:27:20+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM :)

I was looking through recent changesets in the Calgary area and spotted this one. It appears you've changed cuisine on Inglewood ZenDen to cafe. This isn't a valid value for this tag, the original value of coffee_shop was, as you can read on the tag's wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cuisine%3Dcoffee_shop. I've gone ahead and reverted that change.
fortera_au (2025-02-06 01:44:49+00:00): Hi Hairy Spoon, if there's multiple schools in this one landuse, I'd just remove the amenity tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162188738
Hairy Spoon (2025-02-06 03:06:23+00:00): I'm trying to represent both the campus "McAuley Playford Campus" and each of the schools with their own name and meta data. Taken inspiration from here

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/multiple-schools-on-same-ground/124482/8

... the last response in the above provides these links

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32895848

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/133358779

My next move will be to examine the above a bit closer and try to figure out how to get both to render. And no I'm not trying to fake the data to make it render, it just tells me that something is not quite right.
fortera_au (2025-02-06 03:48:41+00:00): Putting amenity=training in that multipolygon both won't change rendering, and is incorrect data, so it should be removed. Both schools do show on the map currently, if they have distinct areas then you could map them as ways, but if there's shared section of campus, the best way is likely going to be leaving the schools as nodes, or seeing if there's a way to represent it with some kind of relation per school, if an option exists.
JeroenHoek (2025-02-06 10:03:25+00:00): Did you look at the whole situation here, or did you only look at the tags? Someone mistakenly added the bridge outline to a bit of water, and now you have removed all the water under the bridge.

You fixed one problem and created another.
ardinin (2025-02-06 17:42:50+00:00): The outline could as well tagged water-only to clarify the situation - as the bridge is already mapped on the highway.
JeroenHoek (2025-02-06 17:55:16+00:00): Nothing wrong with man_made=bridge. It shows the exact dimensions of the bridge and acts as the identity-object for the real-life bridge.

The point is the water here is now cut in two with a gap in between.
ardinin (2025-02-06 18:08:11+00:00): IMO bridge and water need separate objects.
Combine the two waters around? Draw separate items for bridge and water?
JeroenHoek (2025-02-06 18:21:41+00:00): Certainly, they need separate objects. The mapper who added the bridge outline made a mistake there (which you found). Depending on how large the water already is, either join, or keep them as two separate but touching objects. Many mappers put such a meeting edge under bridges somewhere in the middle.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-06 02:10:59+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11228154786
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1357102188

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MatiMatix (2025-02-06 03:50:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162190761
AntMadeira (2025-02-22 20:48:17+00:00): Olá, docthedog.
Reparei que além desta alteração, onde passaste a raiva de town para village, também fizeste o mesmo com Santa Maria de Sardoura e Castelo de Paiva.
Podes explicar porquê, por favor?

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
tuttiton (2025-12-06 22:13:55+00:00): that's a very strange change especially making
1049366884 way the wall. I intend to remove that
tuttiton (2025-12-06 22:15:04+00:00): I mean this one
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1049366884/history/18
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 01:27:26+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165050719
b-jazz (2025-02-07 00:40:33+00:00): Nice to see there are others out there doing similar golf course cleanups as I'm doing. I've put together some tools to build MapRoulette challenges of fairways and greens that intersect. Let me know if you'd like me to generate a dataset for your area to make them easy to find and fix.
NeisBot (2025-02-08 08:06:06+00:00): Hi Min_T, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 41 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
s777n (2025-02-06 11:49:56+00:00): Удалил. Вы продублировали школу. Она уже была отмечена https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427869174
i2004 (2025-02-07 12:06:17+00:00): no entiendo que actualizaste
AgusQui (2025-02-07 12:09:54+00:00): Intercambiaron recorridos entre Ruta 4 y Puerta 8
NeisBot (2025-02-06 03:12:38+00:00): Hi Macan Tutum, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 6 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=162190165
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-06 06:42:47+00:00): Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were by mistake.

Can you please undo your changeset within the coming hours?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-06 03:35:19+00:00): see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162123579 for details
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-06 07:17:41+00:00): Just a test?
Glassman (2025-02-07 00:18:03+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Please don't vandalize OSM
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162190750
Glassman (2025-02-07 00:18:32+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Please don't vandalize OSM. Both of your edits have been reverted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162190830
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 05:02:35+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1703670745/history has al = Kourounninkoto that was added in this edit
What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?
Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Or maybe this key can and should be documented as useful tagging schema?
Greg_Rose (2025-04-30 03:01:48+00:00): It was supposed to be "alt_name". It has been fixed - thx for letting me know.
Carto'Cité (2025-05-04 15:00:07+00:00): Bonjour Kyuuki,

J'ai vu que tu avais fait a priori quelques erreurs de modification de voie de bus (highway=service + access=no +
psv=designated) et aussi sur le fait qu'elle sont accessibles aux vélos (bicycle=designated).

Je tente d'en corriger quelques-unes

Je te propose de regarder cette page pour voir les méthodes pour décrire une voie bus décrite sur un way à part :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bus_lanes

N’hésite pas si tu as des questions ou des remarques :)

Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
maro21 (2025-02-16 21:25:35+00:00): Wulkany były tu 27 milionów lat temu. Obecnie są to szczyty. Na OSM mapujemy teraźniejszość.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mcliquid (2025-02-06 10:16:00+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
silversurfer83 (2025-02-06 21:29:48+00:00): Hi there :)

in addition to mcliquids remark about the size of the changeset I'd like to know if this building you added in Germany is actually there:
https://osm.org/way/1357128109
I ask because none of the available imagery supports your edit.
cheers
jnighan (2025-02-19 16:06:59+00:00): Hi, Zack, Thanks for all the great work you do in CT. But I'd request that you refrain from adding "natural=wood" onto ways with "leisure=nature_reserve" or parks etc., and instead draw the woods as a separate way. I recently removed it from Mooween State Park, and you added it back. As you can see, this makes Red Cedar Lake appear as if it is covered in trees, and it gives the appearance of the treeline perfectly following the park boundary. This is a way of "filling the map with color" that I think we should move away from because it's not accurate. I've been trying to fix this by mapping woods in more detail lately. Thanks, Jack
Zack Bowden (2025-02-20 12:00:48+00:00): Thanks, tbh. I really need to be better about not doing that and not being lazy, haha. :)

- Zack
yelisey90 (2025-02-06 08:56:52+00:00): I restored two paths (but trimmed them) that provide connectivity: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162197828
eggie (2025-02-06 07:42:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM,
No man_made=pier here.

The  tag must be 
tourism=attraction
attraction=boat_ride

and please the name not in German.
Most boat_ride-operators are already on the map and situated west of this very spot.
Greetz,
eggie
Glassman (2025-02-07 00:29:39+00:00): We spell out street name in OSM, the reason is that software has a hard time unabbrevating. I went ahead and fixed them
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162194140
Glyphe (2025-04-03 21:31:28+00:00): Kindly note that the trees that are defined on the map are not located at the right place compared to the reality, see:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12560766309
Manuel H (2025-02-12 23:02:40+00:00): Ich habe etliche deiner völlig sinnlosen Edits hier am Brocken revidiert. 
Z.B. werden die Nodes der Harzer-Wandernadel-Stempelkästen seit 13 Jahren gepflegt und du ändert die innerhalb kürzester Zeit in einen Briefkasten, einen Hausbriefkasten, dann in ein Totem und in ein Kunstwerk. Das ist großer Blödsinn.
Vor dem Editieren genau hinschauen und nicht willkürlich ändern und gleich speichern.
Auch ein absolut No-Go: Du löscht die jahrealten Nodes nachdem du sie vermurkst hast, um sie dann neu zu erstellen, aber auch mit sinnlosem Tagging.
Zudem stellst du Nodes an nachweislich falsche Stellen, z.B. deinen neuen Stempelkasten hinter eine Absperrung in Gebiet, das nicht betreten werden darf.

Deine Geometrie-Edits habe ich größtenteils gelassen. Auf den ersten Blick war da nichts offensichtlich falsch, außer dass du z.B. eine Schutzhütte gelöscht und neu erstellt hast. Da war es aber nicht verhältnismäßig, alle deine Edits zu revidieren.
Nur bei einem Changeset hast du gleichzeitig einige kleine Änderungen in Lübeck gespeichert. Die wurden mit revidiert.

Ich möchte dir dringend anraten, dich darüber zu informieren, wie man richtig OSM bearbeitet. So wie du es machst, ist es falsch.
Vinber-Pro (2025-02-11 13:18:16+00:00): Bonjour Andry,
chouette de te voir contribuer de nouveau.

Quand tu traces des bâtiments, tu peux utiliser le raccourci clavier Q qui va rendre rectangulaire la forme du batiment. Si le batiment est rectangulaire évidemment :)

bonne carto
StC (2025-06-10 21:34:24+00:00): Bonjour,

je ne suis pas sûr que les deux canalisations de l'aqueduc du Loing se croisent, ce qui est leur état actuel après votre série de changesets  :-)
Randonneur77 (2025-06-12 11:45:53+00:00): Il est peu probable que les deux canalisations posées au XIX° se croisent en effet mais j'ai bien regardé il me semble que je n'ai pas touché aux canalisations, j'avis juste rajouter des chemins que j'avaient empruntés précédemment et qui existent bel et bien.
mais je peux me tromper !
StC (2025-06-12 14:13:23+00:00): Et pourtant, les 4 dernières modifications du way 113982454 (Aqueduc du Loing) sont de vous, et ce sont les seules depuis que j'avais aligné les deux chemins en me servant de l'orthophoto l'an dernier :-)
Randonneur77 (2025-06-12 14:27:22+00:00): je vous crois mais je ne vois pas où j'ai fait l'erreur, sans doute quelque chosse m'échappe je suis désolé

j'ai juste voulu crééer des chemions qui passent en surface sur l'aqueduc ou qui le longent et que j'ai utilisés et que j'utiliserai de temps en temps
BrackoNe (2025-03-07 21:26:29+00:00): nemojte prebacivati poi-je banaka na stambene objekte. ostavite ih kao poi
北巷猫眠 (2025-02-08 06:52:57+00:00): 请注意不要直接从百度地图中获取数据添加到OSM中，这可能违反OSM相关政策（https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright）
fuling09260524 (2025-02-10 02:56:42+00:00): 好的
habi (2025-02-06 08:07:50+00:00): Und die dermatologische Uniklinik an MOPUBE angepasst
mcliquid (2025-02-06 10:19:35+00:00): Hallo und grüß dich, du hast den Fußweg zu dem kleinen Picknickplatz gelöscht. War das ein Versehen?
LonelyHunter (2025-02-06 11:08:35+00:00): Hallo! Leider ja, durch Zufall, bitte entschuldigen Sie. Vielen Dank für Ihre Aufmerksamkeit und Ihr Schreiben!
mcliquid (2025-02-06 14:26:52+00:00): Habe den Weg wiederhergestellt. Viele Grüße!
s777n (2025-02-06 12:14:02+00:00): Здравствуйте. Не стоит ставить запрет проезда (motor_vehicle=no) где попало. Если это пешеходная дорожка то стоило просто заменить highway=service на highway=footway если тропинка то на highway=path

Исправил.
notpushkin (2025-02-06 08:43:38+00:00): Thank you so much!
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-06 09:05:17+00:00): You're welcome! 👍
Vinber-Pro (2025-02-11 13:58:06+00:00): Bonjour,
name=rizière n'est pas utile puisque par ailleurs tu as mis crop=rice

le nom ne doit pas servir à décrire, ceux sont les attributs pour cela !

mais c'est super de reprendre de la cartographie :)
s777n (2025-02-06 11:58:29+00:00): Откатил. На спутниковых снимках явно видна дорога с автомобилями. То что туда просто так не проехать уже отмечено шлагбаумом.
Kovoschiz (2025-02-06 10:20:52+00:00): `=permit` is defined as ordinary granted to everyone. `=private` should be used for "permit" meaning restricted.
schoka (2025-02-07 09:45:49+00:00): Hallo shuNgai3,
schön, dass du bei OSM nun auch aktiv bist. 
Zu deinen ersten Änderungen, solltest du wissen, dass in OSM keine Rechtsform eingetragen wird. Weder bei BMW, ALDI, Bauer noch bei TSV Buchbach, sollte deshalb AG, SE oder e.V. als Namensbestandteil eingetragen werden. Einen Hinweis dazu gibt es im Wiki : https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Namenskonventionen#Abk%C3%BCrzungen_und_Eigennamen_mit_Abweichungen_von_den_Regeln_der_Rechtschreibung . Bitte korrigiere deine Änderungen
Neueinsteiger sollten https://learnosm.org/de/beginner/ kennen, oder können sich auch jederzeit bei Fragen an die Community im OSM-Forum wenden.

Viele Grüße
schoka
Pieter Vander Vennet (2025-02-07 10:53:46+00:00): Hallo Tom,

Leuk dat je de AED-data verder aanvult. Een van je foto's is echter een screenshot van Google Maps. Dit is niet toegestaan: op Google Maps rust copyright en Google staat niet toe dat hun kaart "gebruikt wordt om andere kaarten te verbeteren". Ik heb de betreffende afbeelding dan ook verwijderd.

Daarnaast is het ook een beetje dubbele informatie toevoegen. De bedoeling is dat de AED-locatie erg precies in OpenStreetMap staat, dus dan is het niet nodig om nog een tweede kaart toe te voegen ;)

Als je nog vragen hebt, laat gerust weten.

Mvg,
Pieter
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-04 08:10:24+00:00): Hello!

You used
colour=weiß
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12560869935/history

Have you maybe meant
colour=white
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Glocke-Oelde (2025-05-05 06:03:20+00:00): Hello Mateusz,

thank you for your advice.
I have corrected the input for color.

Best regards,
Patrick
addr: (2025-05-10 14:19:04+00:00): Здравствуйте. А зачем вы поставили  motor_vehicle=no на этой дороге?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/84088836
Я уже исправил, но хотелось бы понять причины
recht888 (2025-05-20 21:21:44+00:00): Этот пользователь закрывает дороги просто потому что он так считает нужным. Тоже за ним пришлось прибраться.
addr: (2025-05-22 15:17:42+00:00): Я думаю, если это регулярная практика, и пользователь не отвечает на сообщения, то надо  обратиться в DWG. Такие правки не должны оставаться незамеченными
Famlam (2025-03-29 23:48:20+00:00): Hi Voorstad_EM,

Twee dingen die me opvielen aan de update van Trafo:

- check_date = 2024-10-18
Klopt het dat er echt 3 maanden tussen zat dat je het checkte en het uploadde?
- opening_hours = di - do: 10.00 - 24.00 vr: 10.00 - 23.00 za: 17.00 - 23.00

Graag de officiële syntax aanhouden, zie de wiki, niet een Nederlandse, zelfbedachte tekstversie :)

Ik heb het aangepast