piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Tomas Straupis (2024-05-22 15:30:37+00:00): Hello, please do not update without local knowledge. Tagging was ok. Change reverted.
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-22 19:45:24+00:00): Do not wrap polygon areas around a hole and leave a tiny open gap.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151680872
Tomas Straupis (2024-05-22 16:28:59+00:00): Peržiūrėjau. http://www.vandenszenklai.lt iš karto redirectina į https://appleisland.lt/. Kaip čia gaunasi? :-)
richlv (2024-05-22 20:20:48+00:00): Pirmajam labojumam burvīgi, liels paldies :)

Pāris sīkumi - oficiālā adrešu sintakse mazliet atšķiras, skat. Hellmap veikto labojumu.

Es nedaudz vienkāršoju darba laika pierakstu - tas bija pareizs, bet "We,Fr" apvienošana to padara nedaudz īsāku un vieglāk uztveramu.

Starp citu, laipni aicinām arī Latvijas OSM kopienas čatā, kur var apspriest visu un jebko par OSM: https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
ttomst (2024-05-23 17:33:24+00:00): Paldies!
mcconner22 (2024-05-22 15:34:07+00:00): Some difference in names for Town(e) Center (Drive). According to the official City of Warren street map, it's "Towne Center" from Court Street to Cole Drive. However, the street signs around City Hall all say "Town Center" (no extra e), and signage on the apartments on the south end say "Towne Center Drive". Right now I have it as Town Center to the north, and Towne Center Drive to the south, matching the signage. We can combine it into one street if necessary though.
borovac (2024-05-22 17:19:28+00:00): Hi kentakta,

The same applies to Greece. To be able to add that tag, you need to communicate with the community. Otherwise, DGW will be informed about these changes.

All best borovac
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-22 19:34:56+00:00): Do not connect areas using small slivers.  I have commented on previous changesets for exactly this, but yet, you continue to do this.  Please 1) Stop doing this, and 2) Respond to Changeset comments.

You have not messaged or responded to changeset comments, and I have no choice but to refer this to the DWG for further action.

Please review the following page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=Wrapping%20polygon%20areas%20around%20a%20hole%20and%20leaving%20a%20tiny%20open%20gap.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151682449
nmac85 (2024-05-22 20:25:08+00:00): I cant see what your are wanting if you keep changing them before you send me these messages.
Valmsrj (2024-05-31 13:19:07+00:00): The correct name is RUA ISADORA, not Rua Tulipa de Santa Margarida.
LakeHulun (2024-06-01 15:27:43+00:00): Hi Valmsrj. The street name was provided for us to add by a local Maps user. They suggested that the name was recently updated and also provided a photo of the updated street sign showing the name, "Rua Tulipa de Santa Margarida”. Have a nice day!
silversurfer83 (2024-05-22 19:45:16+00:00): Gude :)

da du keine Quelle angegeben hast: gibt's entsprechende Schilder?

Der Weg, von dem du kopierst ist zb explizit auch für Fahrräder frei. Dieser hier nun nicht.

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151683381
jomamoj (2024-05-23 07:15:40+00:00): Da die umliegenden Wege nur für vehicle=agriculture (bzw. vehicle=agriculture;forestry) freigegeben sind, gehe ich davon aus, dass die Beschränkung auch hier gilt. 

Ich habe einen Fehler gemacht und das Tag als motor_vehicle interpretiert. 

Da diese Wege Teil der Relation "Radwegweisungsnetz Landkreis Kassel" ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8213204 ) sind, ist davon auszugehen, dass auch bicycle=yes gilt.
silversurfer83 (2024-05-22 19:51:02+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

danke, dass du hilfst die Daten aktuell zu halten und vollständiger zu machen.

Eine Bitte: Bleib lokal. Bezogen auf diese Änderung hier: Einmal in der Gegend Hanau und einmal in der Gegend Cottbus etwas ändern, aber bitte nicht gleichzeitig.

Details:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Bei Fragen immer raus damit :)

happy mapping
silversurfer83
Cloud_Boy (2024-05-23 11:09:29+00:00): Hallo,

ups, da war ich wohl etwas zu motiviert :)
Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, kommt nicht mehr vor. 
Auf das Angebot mit Fragen werde ich definitiv zurückkommen, wenn welche aufploppen.
Grüße!
silversurfer83 (2024-05-23 11:13:47+00:00): Kein Ding :)

Weiter viel Spaß
thunderylight (2024-05-28 16:31:04+00:00): Hallo @igami,
es gibt bereits einen Eintrag (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11910729569#map=19/51.90207/8.37748) zum Makerspace Gütersloh e.V. , ich habe mal die zuätzlichen Informationen übernommen. Damit wird dieser Eintrag nicht mehr benötigt.
NeisBot (2024-05-22 16:10:05+00:00): Hi ShadyMilk, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1285654790

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
aenariel (2025-08-08 18:25:18+00:00): Olá wermworm! Podes-me referir-me a alguma fonte sobre o nome do "Ringue dos Badalhocos", por favor?
wermworm (2025-08-11 09:56:44+00:00): Estava no google maps
AntMadeira (2025-09-08 18:19:33+00:00): wermworm, sabes que não é permitido copiar dados do Google Maps para o OSM, certo? São dados com direitos de autor.
wermworm (2025-09-08 18:37:22+00:00): Compreendo o ponto. Eu sei que existe ali o ringue, apenas coloquei o nome que aparece no Google Maps. Mas percebo o problema!
MxxCon (2024-05-26 03:32:12+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit?
Satellite imagery shows these are just regular speed humps..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151684392
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-26 17:39:15+00:00): Jak od 08.06.2024 to czemu edytujesz teraz? Jest jakieś potwierdzenie tego zawieszenia?
d3mol3k (2024-05-27 17:26:04+00:00): linia tramwajowa działa.
Ondřej Lopatka (2026-01-18 15:50:17+00:00): To je ale velmi neříkající popis changesetu. Jaký je zdroj dat?
miluethi (2024-05-22 16:30:23+00:00): Hi Rachel,

Please square out all buildings in OSM. Just select a building shape and press "Q".

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
MxxCon (2024-05-31 05:29:50+00:00): Hello.
"A Small Luxury Hotel" does not belong in a POI name tag.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151684930
Yuliya Grinevich (2024-05-31 05:49:58+00:00): But this is the part of the property name as well. The correct name is "Historic Rocky Waters Inn, A Small Luxury Hotel", please see the screenshot from the official website: https://prnt.sc/KUP37AvPgT43

Is it any way to update the name to its full version?
MxxCon (2024-05-31 06:00:54+00:00): This just stinks of SEO keyword stuffing. 🫤I could that would go into the official_name= tag?
But that seems more like a slogan rather than a name.
miluethi (2024-06-01 19:54:31+00:00): Please don't include several singled buildings into one shape.
vJack (2024-05-22 16:33:15+00:00): https://imgur.com/a/Lj3vce9
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-23 19:32:32+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151685348
eggie (2024-05-22 17:07:12+00:00): Dag Martian..
name= 	vuilnis werf restaurants
hoort eigenlijk niet op de kaart.
Ik heb er even description van gemaakt.
Iets met recycling misschien?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling

Het is beter de oude wegen aan te passen ipv van alles te verwijderen. Nu gaat de historie verloren.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-22 17:09:21+00:00): Wanneer je access=no op wegen staat is iets Verboden Toegang. Dat zal hier toch niet?

Meestal zijn combinaties met access=no bijna altijd fout. Ik heb access=no verwijderd
jb54osm (2024-05-22 18:36:32+00:00): Kwam toevallig 'in de buurt'. Heb wat uitlijningen verbeterd; en "stort" gemaakt van het depot.
eggie (2024-05-22 17:13:18+00:00): Dag Martion.. Meestal hebben laadpalen geen naam. Dit zijn wel heel veel namen.
Volgens mij kun je brand= gebruiken.

Kijk even hier.. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
name=..... gebruiken we voor het gehele laadpalengebied. 
name=* 	The signposted proper name of the charging station, for example “Seed & Greet Ladepark”. 
MVG
eggie
miluethi (2024-05-22 16:45:31+00:00): tchandra3, 

Please square our your building. Just press the "Q" with a selected buiding shape. 

Thanks
miluethi (2024-05-24 01:12:49+00:00): tchandra,

your building shapes do not match the satellite imagery at all. If you are not interested in contributing good work to OSM, do something else please.
I'm going to delete your buildings.
Langlaeufer (2024-07-05 17:40:22+00:00): Hallo, Du hast hier eine Fahrradstraße eingetragen. Was gibt es hier für eine Freigeabe für Kfz? "Kfz frei", oder "Anlieger frei"? Außerdem ist eine Shared lane auf der Straße eingetragen. Die ist dann wohl obsolete?
Grüße Langläufer
navigist (2024-07-06 05:53:53+00:00): Schwierig die Sachen einzutragen:
- Einbahnstraße für KFZ, nur in östlicher Route erlaubt auf der Straße, auf der auch der Fahrräder nur in östlicher Router fahren-
- in westlicher Router sollen die Fahrräder auf dem alten Fahrradradweg fahren
Langlaeufer (2024-07-06 06:00:12+00:00): solgange der Radweg nicht separat eingezeichnet ist muss da trotzdem oneway:bicycle=no ran - weil das bezeieht sich auf die gesamte Straße und nicht nur auf die Fahrbahn
Langlaeufer (2024-07-06 06:01:25+00:00): Aber ist es denn nun überhaut eine Fahrradstraße (Zeichen 244)?
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-23 03:02:51+00:00): Same thing here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=Wrapping%20polygon%20areas%20around%20a%20hole%20and%20leaving%20a%20tiny%20open%20gap.
Gonéo (2024-09-12 20:10:31+00:00): Pourquoi avoir supprimé le cycleway:left=separate sur la voie taxis devant la gare ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447043952 Il y a bien une piste cyclable tracée séparément à ce niveau.

D'autre part, côté droit je vois des pictos vélo au sol (sans bande cyclable) donc ce serait cycleway:right=shared_lane
cycleway:right:lane=pictogram
Même si les pictos ne servent qu'à rappeler un cheminement cycliste autorisé. Cet attribut évite en autres qu'un utilisateur StreetComplete indique qu'il y a une piste cyclable le long de la voie alors qu'elle est tracée individuellement et on aurait un doublon.
Strubbl (2024-05-22 17:35:22+00:00): Hi Ludwich, ich bin gespannt, wenn das 3D Rendering passend ist. Kontrollierst du das mit F4map?

Den hier neu eingeführten Tag roof:heigth gibt es nicht, ein Tippfehler, du wolltest wahrscheinlich roof:height nutzen

Viele Grüße
ludwich (2024-05-24 14:53:45+00:00): Hallo Strubbl, ja ich schaue Mit F4Map und Blosm in Blender.
Höhe und Weite sind immer wieder eine Tipperische Herausforderung ;-)
Du bist ein lokaler Mapper?
ludwich
Strubbl (2024-05-26 19:15:44+00:00): Hi,
ja genau. Ich bin da beim neuen Kindl-Gebäude auch schon öfter vorbeigeradelt. 

Du kannst auch deine Datenänderungen in meiner Streetsgl-Instanz anschauen:
https://bayern3d.strubbl.de/#48.09043,11.59180,39.50,16.00,349.77

Die wird morgens gegen 7 Uhr mit den Daten von 20 Uhr vom Vorabend aktualisiert. Also mit den Daten, die die Geofabrik bereitstellt.

Viele Grüße
ludwich (2024-05-30 20:51:29+00:00): Hallo Strubbl, nett wie der Krumme Kran das krumme Gebäude baut. Fachkräftemangel ;-)
Danke für den Hinweis!
Ludwich
aceman444 (2024-06-24 19:45:36+00:00): Zdravim, aky je zdroj na zmenu typu trate do Trencianskych Teplic? Nic neuvadzate.
Frans S (2024-06-10 12:16:48+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)

Inaccurate mapped.

Most buildings not squared.

Connected nodes of buildings to each other or to highways
Mapped empty courtyard as a building. If there is no shadow of a building, it is not a building.
Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151687437
NorthCrab (2024-05-28 05:26:19+00:00): It seems to exist but is not official: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XK_(user_assigned_code)
thefrankbraun (2024-05-28 16:04:18+00:00): Sorry, I was a bit quick with this change. Thanks for clarifying and the revert!
NorthCrab (2024-05-28 16:41:48+00:00): Alrighty :-)
Frans S (2024-06-10 12:55:50+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Often inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.
Connected nodes of building to other features.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151687894
Frans S (2024-06-19 09:05:20+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Clustered buildings.
Oversize mapped buildings
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings connected with nodes to each other
Buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151688063
Frans S (2024-06-12 13:29:53+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped. You just draw rectangular buildings despite they show a more complex form.
Follow the rooflines accurate !

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151688069
Frans S (2024-06-12 13:29:54+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped. You just draw rectangular buildings despite they show a more complex form.
Follow the rooflines accurate !

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151688069
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-24 02:32:22+00:00): Reviewed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151688123
Frans S (2024-06-19 11:42:03+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped. Just mapped all buildings as a rectangular one, despite they are often more complicated.
Included the yards as well.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151688293
LucGommans (2024-05-22 17:34:47+00:00): forgot to mention that the path I disconnected (at node 11926393518) was not there (surveyed two days ago). Did not have an opportunity to check the other end, so it might have to be pruned back further, I don't know
Frans S (2024-06-07 12:39:02+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151688536
Jrachi (2024-06-14 20:10:10+00:00): Ciao.
Hai aggiunto un nodo per il Bivacco Soardi che esisteva già come building!
Non te ne sei accorto?
Ivo
Frans S (2024-06-13 10:11:16+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.

Multiple buildings clustered.

Nodes of buildings connected to other buildings or roads.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151688867
Frans S (2024-06-13 10:24:28+00:00): Hello, another issue. Do not add a layer to a building when you want to hide an error !
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151688867
Frans S (2024-06-29 13:13:56+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not cluster buildings like here.
Map each building individually.
Best regards
Frans S (2024-06-29 13:14:27+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=153331784
See this changeset how it should be mapped.
Best regards
Frans S (2024-06-29 07:56:53+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, you hardly squared the buildings you have mapped.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151689069
fititnt (2024-06-09 21:48:55+00:00): Olá @JohanHoogland.

Pode por favor explicar por que deletou highway=raceway adicionada por mapeador com conhecimento local e ainda visível no "imagery_used=Bing Maps Aeria" do seu changeset?

Link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/493142091/history#map=18/-29.41101/-51.94865
Frans S (2024-06-29 10:16:16+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not connect nodes of buildings to each other. Map buildings as individual ones.( Hold the Alt key down when mapping close to other buildings.)
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151689287
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2024-05-30 08:55:02+00:00): لماذا قمت بحذف بعض وسوم الأماكن ؟
Frans S (2024-06-02 13:15:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not connect nodes of building to other buildings. Each building need to be mapped as a free stand building.
Best regards
Britzz (2024-11-24 20:59:25+00:00): bonjour, le choix de man_made=tower pour les colonnes supportant le métro aérien (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/63196322) n'est pas correct, jepense. J'ai remplacé par man_made=column
cartoleo (2024-11-27 20:20:21+00:00): Oh, bien vu, merci !
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2024-05-30 08:50:43+00:00): لماذا قمت بحذف اسم الجبل مرة أخرى ؟
Frans S (2024-05-31 14:23:37+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.
Clustered buildings.
Connected nodes to other houses or roads.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151689634
empty_child (2024-05-23 19:50:49+00:00): Добрый день
Не создавайте, пожалуйста, копии объектов (она уже отмечена правее)