piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
streckenkundler (2026-04-03 19:56:43+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/autobahnanschlusse-deren-planung-und-lage/142820
flierfy (2026-04-04 11:22:54+00:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFZL2wWP-gQ
In diesem Video wird gezeigt, wie der Knotenpunkt in den nächsten Jahren umgebaut wird. Und anhand dessen habe ich die geplanten Rampen in die Karte geschätzt.

Grüsse,
Stephan
streckenkundler (2026-04-04 16:43:18+00:00): Hei, achherrje.. .was für eine Schönfärberei... In den nächsten 5-6 Jahren wir da äuserst wenig und wenn,  dann nur was in sehr abgepeckter Form kommen...
Ich bin für eine Entfernung dieser fixen Ideen... Erfassen erst, wenn signifikante Bautätigkeiten gibt...

erschrockene Grüße, streckenkundler
Fen <3 (2026-04-02 22:27:37+00:00): is it a temporary closure? or is it permanent?
eggie (2026-04-01 22:06:48+00:00): Dag sSmits,

De uitzonderingen voor tweewielers op oneway= yes en no klopten niet meer.
Die heb ik aangepast. het zou anders niet correct routeren.
Mogen op dat stuk pedestrian Telegraafstraat wel fietsers rijden?
Dan bicycle=yes toevoegen.

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2026-04-01 20:54:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13699807979 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tree nursery"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-09 22:33:21+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181119776
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-02 06:37:25+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180742417
NeisBot (2026-04-01 20:57:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/10311294172 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Construction company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-09 22:33:23+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181119777
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-02 06:36:19+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180742417
NeisBot (2026-04-01 21:03:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13696457323 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Antique shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-09 22:33:28+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181119782
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-04-01 21:06:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13659895061 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Pet supply store"

#MapWithoutSpam
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-04 10:54:28+00:00): Reverted series of changesets adding SEO POI and blatantly promotional description=* and other malformed tags to it

https://osm.org/changeset/185084905
NeisBot (2026-04-01 21:06:22+00:00): Hi antonin58, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 82% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 9 landuse(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180740873
Wildsharky (2026-04-03 06:21:47+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180793704
الوعي الجديد (2026-04-03 23:37:08+00:00): المكان الفعلي في هذه النقطه من الخريطه لا يوجد فيه سفاره او مبني
ولا يوجد هذا الإسم في هذا المكان
بالقرب منه يوجد عماره سكنيه للأسرة محدودة الدخل
لذالك ارجو ان يتم ازالة هذه المساهمه من بيانات الخريطه لأنها مضلله ولا وجود لها 
تنظيف الخريطه من المساهمات المضلله والتخريبيه حتى يتمكن المستخدمين بإستخدام الخريطه o.s.m ذات مصداقيه ودقه
Wildsharky (2026-04-03 06:19:50+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180752669
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 10:41:17+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset 184906777

https://osm.org/changeset/184906777
sheldonelectric (2026-04-01 21:37:02+00:00): Did you even look at what you were doing, before reverting? What's wrong with the street names, the bus lines, etc?
sheldonelectric (2026-05-06 19:36:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12149998164 in your revert you have put questionable opening hours and questionable price which I had fixed. The source of my data is legal, according to the community thread. 
So restore my work which took me days to fix and it took you minutes to destroy.
woodpeck (2026-05-06 20:56:25+00:00): When the DWG reverts a changeset or a series of changesets for a rule violation or quality problem - in this case, your misuse of the "name" tag and your addition of "charge" tags - we will usually make some effort to revert only what needs reverting, but we cannot always sort the good from the bad. In your case I opted to revert your "Aldi" edits altogether even though a part of them might have been acceptable. It would have been considerably more work for me to keep some tags and revert others, and with your unwillingness to discuss the matter in the German community as requested, I didn't feel I had to spend that extra time.

I agree that I overreached with the revert in also yanking some edits that had nothing to do with charging stations altogether, and attempted to fix that in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181148132 but I won't make an effort to extract the opening_hours from your Aldi edits.
sheldonelectric (2026-05-07 08:59:33+00:00): What you did was completely unreasonable and now I have to fix everything again.
Next time, when you disagree with another member, wait for an answer to the blocking message before reverting anything.
Reverting without asking is only ok when done from new accounts.
sheldonelectric (2026-05-07 09:13:18+00:00): You destroyed my data 3 minutes after messaging me to discuss with the community, so this is not a valid argument.
Im Fokus (2026-04-01 21:40:59+00:00): Gut gemeint, gut gemacht, dennoch zumindest bezüglich der relativ kurzzeitigen Nachtsperrungen nicht unbedingt nützlich im Sinne von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Tempor%C3%A4res. Bei der Entfernung der nicht mehr aktuellen Note zur Dauer der Sperrung habe ich deshalb die in 30 Stunden auslaufende Nachtsperre ebenfalls entfernt.
Die eigentlich erledigten Hinweise lasse ich stehen als Erinnerung an das Sperrungsende am Monatsende, nach dem construction=minor zu entfernen ist.
NeisBot (2026-04-01 21:36:16+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, nick12319685876.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Updated tree description and subspecies, removed genus, leaf type, and marker details"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
Patr1k_P (2026-04-04 12:42:56+00:00): ten nazov stromu mate odkial?
nick12319685876 (2026-04-04 14:21:48+00:00): Ludia tam dali tabulku  toho k pramenu, mozno to odstranili pozrem ale bolo to tam mesiace.
sy_ossfin (2026-04-02 20:18:36+00:00): Hey Schneelix,
danke für deinen Beitrag.

Unabhängig deiner Änderung ist mir aufgefallen, dass der Weg hinter den Garagen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25994449) als "Fußgängerzone" erfasst worden ist. Das scheint mir eher untypisch zu sein. 

Weißt du zufällig wie die gegebenheiten vor Ort sind?

Ich vermute eher einen Pfad/Footway.

Grüße
Schneelix (2026-04-02 21:03:52+00:00): Hallo,
Fußgängerzone ist übertrieben. Das ist mehr ein gepflasterter Fuß- und Radweg hinten an den Garagen entlang.
Viele Grüße!
NeisBot (2026-04-01 21:39:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13659621005 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Monument maker workshop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-02 04:33:12+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-04 10:53:24+00:00): Reverted series of changesets adding SEO POI and blatantly promotional description=* and other malformed tags to it

https://osm.org/changeset/185084861
arafqus (2026-04-01 21:41:56+00:00): + Tamenrasset name from fr to ar+ber
+In Guezzam name from fr to ar+ber
ilias_ (2026-04-01 22:57:33+00:00): Did you discuss this change with the Algerian community beforehand? Your bio says you're part of the Algérie Mapper Team, which, curiously, have their Facebook page in French. So why are you removing French names everywhere? Does nobody speak French in Algeria?

Please see this discussion before continuing your changes

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/names-in-algeria/127362/
Saad chaoui (2026-04-02 10:16:28+00:00): The official languages ​​in Algeria are Arabic and Tamazight (Berber), and yes, no one in Algeria speaks French as a mother tongue.
NeisBot (2026-04-01 21:45:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13659398065 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Carpet store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-09 22:33:31+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181119788
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
NeisBot (2026-04-01 21:48:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13662825669 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Carpet outlet"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-09 22:33:35+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181119792
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-04-01 21:51:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13659373839 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Butcher shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-09 22:33:38+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181119794
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 10:33:00+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset 184906398

https://osm.org/changeset/184906398
NeisBot (2026-04-01 21:54:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13665446346 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Trading card shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-09 22:33:41+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181119795
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-02 06:07:13+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180742161
Stretch Longfellow (2026-04-07 16:18:10+00:00): Where did the North/South Highway 6 names come from? Signage seems to indicate otherwise (not that Gretna in particular is consistent...). Most signage I see is Highway 6/31.
SD Mapman (2026-04-08 02:40:51+00:00): I got that from addresses, I've been following the procedure I've been using up in SD where the address name is what goes in the name field (which has been approved by local government officials up here!). If you want to move that into alt_name or put Highway 6/31 into alt_name I have no objection. I just think the directionals should be preserved somehow.
Stretch Longfellow (2026-04-09 17:12:59+00:00): I figured that was going to be the case. This is one of those issues where I have no idea of the right answer, and OSM's wiki doesn't really specify here. For someone trying to find an address, yours would be the preferred usage, but for someone driving, mine would.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-02 06:06:41+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180742235
NeisBot (2026-04-01 22:00:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13699060108 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Weight loss clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-09 22:33:46+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181119796
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-04-01 22:00:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13699098327 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Smoke shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-09 22:33:50+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181119799
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-02 06:06:54+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180742361
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-02 06:36:54+00:00): Thanks @maschiken

Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180740648
Saad chaoui (2026-04-04 20:36:00+00:00): لغات الجزائر الرسمية هي العربية والأمازيغية وهي اللغات التي يتحدث بإحداها أو بكلتاهما كل الشعب الجزائر ولا علاقة لنا باللغة الفرنسية فهي ليست لغة رسمية وليست حتى لغة وطنية بل تعتبر اللغة "الأجنبية" الأولى وحتى هاذا الأمر بدأ في التغيير مع توجه الدولة نحو اللغة الإنجليزية، وعليه من غير الصائب تسمية الولايات باللغات العربية والأمازيغية و"الفرنسية" كوننا في الجزائر لاعلاقة لنا باللغة الفرنسية، لذا يجب الإكتفاء في تسمية الولايات والمدن والقرى والمداشر والأنهار والجبال باللغة العربية والأمازيغية . سوف أتواصل معك ومع أشخاص أخرين لنناقش هاذا الأمر ونحسمه لتنتهي هذه الفوضى اللغوية في الجزائر
eggie (2026-04-02 05:20:25+00:00): 👍
Dino Michelini (2026-04-02 12:51:38+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che hai corretto la geometria di queste strade attraverso le immagini satellitari di Bing. È risaputo che sebbene Bing abbia immagini più nitide e recenti di Esri il la proiezione e posizionamento sul reticolo geografico è molto impreciso di decine di metri. Inoltre, nella nostra zona (Viterbo) ho verificato che nel mosaico delle immagini di Bing possono esserci delle immagini ripetuti anche tre o  quattro volte. Per cui se aggiorni la mappa di OSM attraverso Bing devi necessariamente correggere lo spostamento (errore) tramite la sovrapposizione di immagini Esri  o le ortofoto del PCN che sono molto più precise. Purtroppo, questa operazione di compensazione dello scostamento è possibile per ora solo con JOM. Di fatto, lo spostamento di vertici di linee già disegnati con Esri o ortofoto  PCN da utenti con più esperienza e conoscenza senza la correzione di Bing causa un degrado della precisione della mappa OSM: in pratica si pensa di contribuire in  qualche modo a OSM ma in realtà si fa un lavoro inutile e peggiorativo. Pertanto, piuttosto che perdere tempo nel correggere geometrie già disegnate da molti anni e sufficientemente precise commettendo ulteriori errori, ti invito a passare a JOSM e leggere prima di mappare qualsiasi cosa la wiki di OSM e nel caso specifico le pagine:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Bing_Maps#Correzione_disallineamento
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:JOSM
Stefrock (2026-04-02 17:21:54+00:00): ciao caro, ti ringrazio per le info, ma io sono un geometra topografo e non so cosa sia successo o perché si sia impostato Bing so benissimo che la precisione lascia desiderare, d’ora in poi farò come mi hai indicato cortesemente per quanto riguarda però i numeri civici sono corretti perché abito qui e ci sono numerosi problemi perché nessuno si è preso la briga di segnalarli come sono nella realtà infatti, i corrieri continuano a sbagliare. Per il resto ti ringrazio e seguirò le tue istruzioni caro saluto, Stefano.
Wildsharky (2026-04-03 06:21:09+00:00):  Reverted in changeset id:180765254
TrickyFoxy (2026-05-04 19:49:51+00:00): 👋 Чтоы вы пытались обозначить как парк?
kylor (2026-04-01 23:42:17+00:00): pretty general
codywindrose (2026-04-04 14:49:24+00:00): extremely damn general, was that intentional?
dmjab13 (2026-04-06 15:25:22+00:00): this changeset sucks
evgenykatyshev (2026-04-02 08:18:43+00:00): Hello. Thanks for your contribution!

I have a couple of minor notes regarding your edits. You added the name "muddy path" to the path. It's better to avoid such naming, because it isn't a proper name. If you want to describe the path surface, you can add the tag surface=mud to it instead.

"wise cow's path" also sounds strange.

Instead of (or additionally to) description=private property I'd add access=private
McKulkin (2026-04-02 11:55:05+00:00): It's a stripped down version of my original edit that contained more paths with various names to aid the navigation. But as this area lays just between active touristic trails and might/will be used as a shortcut between the two, it makes sense to keep it short and easy. I now removed the names and updated the surface tag. Let's let the explorer explore on his own.

As re the land plot, it's private but freely accessible (thus far). The point is to hint the user that it's not a part of tourist infrastructure.
--
done via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180763172
felipeeugenio (2026-04-02 12:47:50+00:00): Hola.
Gracias pormtu ediciones, pero mapeamos casas desde su base y cuadrandolas con la letra Q. Esto que vemos son casi representaciones esquemáticas y totalmente hechas a pulso. Veré como arreglarlas, pero quizás tenga que borrarlas. Por favor tomarse el mapeo mas lentamente. Revisar como están hechas ciudades como San Fernando por ejemplo.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180744367
ajmat (2026-04-03 12:59:35+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 180810520
savsk (2026-04-02 14:44:51+00:00): według informacji lokalnych autentycznie powstaje tutaj stacja benzynowa, być może coś więcej, jakieś sklepy również
ajmat (2026-04-04 16:04:07+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 180861310
McKulkin (2026-04-02 00:29:10+00:00): Judging from the conversation, the owner isn't thrilled about tourists/visitors using this path to enter his property. The main entrance is from the south, and that's how the property should normally be accessed. There's a secondary exit though the west gate, but that's for private use only. 
As far as I understood and remembered (2025).
evgenykatyshev (2026-04-02 08:18:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for your contribution!

I have a couple of minor notes regarding your edits. You added the name "muddy path" to the path. It's better to avoid such naming, because it isn't a proper name. If you want to describe the path surface, you can add the tag surface=mud to it instead.

"wise cow's path" also sounds strange.

Instead of (or additionally to) description=private property I'd add access=private
evgenykatyshev (2026-04-02 08:19:09+00:00): Sorry, my comment was to another changeset, not this one.
fortera_au (2026-04-02 00:47:25+00:00): Hi, aerial imagery still shows a building here, has that been demolished recently or was removing building=yes a mistake?
MKT HPG (2026-04-02 01:31:27+00:00): Hi there is still a building here
eggie (2026-04-02 07:22:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community