piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
P_kawa (2025-06-08 11:37:48+00:00): Po sprawdzeniu w terenie mogę stwierdzić że jest to tylko droga rowerowa oznaczona znakiem C-13, więc powinno być to po prostu oznaczone jako highway=cycleway. A segregated=no, foot=designated oraz bicycle=designated jest zbędne
jeslop (2025-03-10 16:09:28+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163449539
jeslop (2025-03-10 16:09:06+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163449521
DaveF (2025-04-02 14:47:13+00:00): It was temporarily closed due to construction. Please don't make amendments where you fail to understand the situation.
It is now open.
jeslop (2025-03-10 16:08:20+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163449491
jeslop (2025-03-10 16:08:00+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163449476
jeslop (2025-03-10 16:07:24+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163449458
jeslop (2025-03-10 16:07:02+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163449443
jeslop (2025-03-10 16:06:45+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163449427
jeslop (2025-03-10 16:05:48+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163449395
jeslop (2025-03-10 16:05:29+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163449380
jeslop (2025-03-10 16:04:55+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163449359
jeslop (2025-03-10 16:04:36+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163449346
cuzi (2025-03-13 11:25:31+00:00): Da ist noch ein Stoppschild von der früheren Kreuzung eingetragen, gibt es das noch?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/330608552
Mourick (2025-03-13 11:58:43+00:00): Ich habe keins gesehen. Bin aber nur auf die L2251 gefahren. Gehe mal davon aus, dass es kein Stopschild mehr gibt.
Hervé TUC (2025-04-02 08:12:52+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci de laisser le tag surface=sett. Le tag surface=cobblestone est imprécis et correspond au langage courant ; se référer au wiki pour plus d'infos : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:surface
os-emmer (2025-04-05 19:18:00+00:00): Hello lankapuhelin,
you added a strange entry for operator:wikidata here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129709794
That should be a wikidata item, befinning with a "Q". Can you check that? Thanks.
lankapuhelin (2025-04-05 19:26:56+00:00): Thank you for the heads-up. I fixed it.
Aenet (2025-03-12 17:11:03+00:00): If possible in the future, can you upload changesets that are located in many far away places separately? It helps when local users are trying to see what changes have been made recently in their area to not have so many large changesets that don't actually affect their area showing up on the map. Thank you.
Jordi MF (2025-03-10 15:05:24+00:00): Este usuaio ha eliminaado etiquetas corectas de idioma (name:ca). Unido a que también ha editado únicamente le nombre de muicipios, es altamente probable que se trate de una multicuenta creada para evitar bloqueos: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros

El usuario s331x (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/s331x), con un nombre similar al de 3fzhp, parece pertenecer al mismo tipo de multicuenta.
NeisBot (2025-03-10 14:18:35+00:00): Hi Gam3Junkie, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 81% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 3 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163444658
NeisReview (2025-03-10 20:30:06+00:00): 🤷‍♀️🤷‍♂️ Mapper deleted their own data.
dzamper (2025-03-10 14:26:44+00:00): Ten zestaw zmian lepszy niż poprzedni, ale niestety nadal po zmianach jest gorzej niż przed nimi. Tutaj też brakuje jakichkolwiek restrykcji czy choćby tagów które zabraniałyby zmiany pasa ruchu między połówkami jezdni, zgodnie z oznakowaniem m.in. poziomym.
stasiu512 (2025-03-10 14:28:39+00:00): których restrykcji brakuje? wydaje mi się że wszystkie uzupełniłem
stasiu512 (2025-03-10 14:29:34+00:00): jakie tagi masz na myśli, nie znam takich
stasiu512 (2025-03-10 14:30:43+00:00): Tu restrykcje - 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18803238

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18803239

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18803240
dzamper (2025-03-10 14:36:32+00:00): Na pewno brakuje zakazu jazdy z estakady na wyjazd w Baildona i zakazu jazdy ze Żmiji na jezdnię główną, może jeszcze jakichś. Generalnie jeśli to ma tak zostać to trzeba uniemożliwić wszystkie manewry których niemożliwość wynikała ze starej geometrii, bo od tego była. W razie czego linie ciągłe dobrze widać na ortofoto.
dzamper (2025-03-10 14:39:27+00:00): Jeśli chodzi o tagi to mam na myśli np. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:change
Choć relacje restrykcji i tak muszą powstać, bo podejrzewam że wsparcie dla tego tagu w routerach może być bardzo słabe
stasiu512 (2025-03-10 14:41:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18803277 dodałem zakaz z estakady w Baildona, musiałem to przeoczyć, ale ze Żmiji można jechać w każdym kierunku
dzamper (2025-03-10 15:18:22+00:00): Racja, trochę mi się rozdwoiło w oczach :)
dzamper (2025-03-10 15:33:49+00:00): Hm. To chyba faktycznie tylko ta jedna brakowała. Chyba trochę przesadziłem z reakcją :) Trzeba by poczekać aż zmiany się rozpropagują i zobaczymy czy routery faktycznie takie zmapowanie „łykają”? Z tego co udało mi się znaleźć to przynajmniej GraphHopper od niecałego roku już wspiera (w końcu…) restrykcie z kilkoma liniami jako via, które są tu niezbędne, nie wiem jak reszta…
Dawid2849 (2025-03-10 16:36:00+00:00): Dodałem change:lanes. Mam nadzieję, że nie zrobiłem przy tym żadnego błędu
dzamper (2025-03-13 09:10:35+00:00): Valhalla już się odświeżyła i wygląda w porządku:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_car&route=50.270817%2C18.996225%3B50.269971%2C18.998929#map=16/50.27036/19.00193
dzamper (2025-03-16 09:06:59+00:00): OSRM też w porządku:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=50.270817%2C18.996225%3B50.269971%2C18.998929

Graphhopper nadal jeszcze nie odświeżył danych :))
dzamper (2025-03-17 13:53:42+00:00): Graphopper też wporzo:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=50.270817%2C18.996225%3B50.269971%2C18.998929

szczerze to jestem pozytywnie zaskoczony że nie ma już z takimi skomplikowanymi restrykcjami takich problemów jak kiedyś, choć z tego co znalazłem to Graphhopper jeszcze rok temu by sobie z tym nie poradził
stasiu512 (2025-03-17 15:03:34+00:00): Cieszę się że moja zmiana okazała się prawidłową, dobrze że takie relacje są odbierane przez różne systemy, bardzo to ułatwia.
zuicz (2026-02-12 22:28:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178454163
eggie (2025-03-10 15:25:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-03-10 15:32:54+00:00): Feedback:  Een fietspad kan niet ook nog een =fietsstraat zijn. Een woonerf wel.

Er zit dus iet niet helemaal goed in je tagging. 
Ik zal cyclestreet=yes verwijderen van het stukje fietspad. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-10 15:34:26+00:00): maxspeed 15 ook verwijderd van fietspad.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-03-23 10:16:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163979213 where the changeset comment is: Following on from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163963906 , and see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/about-mapping-features-with-computer-vision/127790 - reverting some 'AI detected swimming pools', some of dubious quality.
Ruthless78 (2025-03-10 14:38:08+00:00): https://www.strava.com/activities/13837695995
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 23:59:15+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/294888995/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle:repair and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service:bicycle:repair
Xvtn (2025-03-10 17:53:00+00:00): Howdy! The aquatic center here already has an outer area with the name and other tags, so I moved the data you added from this concession / office building to the overall area feature. Let me know if you disagree with that!
pitfire (2025-04-07 07:32:31+00:00): Hi Waldläufer Oberberg,

worin besteht der Sinn für Weg: 1366000325. Warum sollten Fussgänger über die Fahrbahn im Kreisel laufen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=51.116055%2C7.390344%3B51.116702%2C7.390312#map=18/51.116229/7.390258

VG pitfire
Oberbergmapper (2025-04-07 13:30:21+00:00): Hi pitfire,
ich weiss nicht genau, welchen Weg Du meinst, d.h. ich weiss nicht wie ich die Wegnummer herausfinden kann.
Wenn das der Weg von der Constantin-Hamm-Strasse zum Kreisel, weiss ich auch nicht welchen Sinn er hat, aber er ist da. Vermutlich älter als der Kreisel.
Grüße
Waldläufer Oberberg
rskedgell (2025-07-14 10:35:45+00:00): I see that you have mapped traffic lanes on several sections of road in this area as separate ways, which is usually only correct where there is physical carriageway separation over an extended distance. We have tags like lanes=* + lanes:forward=* + lanes:backward=* + turn:lanes to describe the characteristics of the carriageway.

See e.g. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway
mrpacmanmap (2025-07-23 19:14:44+00:00): Places where the roads have been mapped as split are only done so when features exist between the carriageways, such as bollards on either side of pedestrian crossing points. All of the roads in this area have correct turn restrictions for the accurate interpretation by navigational software.
rskedgell (2025-07-23 23:34:46+00:00): Paint isn't physical separation. If we take the intersection between Birmingham Road/Beeches Road/Roebuck Street as an example, the turn lanes are just that: lanes. They aren't physically separated by anything, or at least they certainly weren't when I ran that way a fortnight ago. It's a fiction. It's mapping for the renderer.
b-jazz (2025-03-11 05:54:32+00:00): ◉ The lines that define Fairways and Greens should never intersect or partially overlap each other. If there is a fringe around the green that is similar to the fairway, the fairway should extend around the green and the two objects should be merged together into a multipolygon (See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon for how to create them with your map editor). If there is no obvious fringe, the fairway should butt up against the green and every node between them should be shared. Please read the wiki for visual examples and instructions on how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls
pitfire (2025-04-07 08:09:55+00:00): Hallo Waldläufer Oberberg,

wozu bedarf es Weg: 1366002141.
Endet in der Grünanlage und ist auch auf keiner Kartentenansicht erkrnnbar?
Wenn es einen Trampelpfad zum erreichen des Parkplatzes geben sollte, ist es möglicherweise:
informal=yes – additive tag to indicate a informal/unofficial footway

VG pitfire
Oberbergmapper (2025-04-07 13:40:22+00:00): Hi pitfire,
es handelt sich um einen ganz neu angelegten, gepflasterten Gehweg, der an den Recycling Container endet. Damit ist auch der Zweck erklärt. Auf openstreetmap.de/karte ist dies recht gut erkennbar. 
Neuerdings gibt es tatsächlich von da aus auch noch einen Schotterpfad, der zum Parkplatz führt. Werde ich gleich mal kartieren und dein vorgeschlagenes informal=yes benutzen.
Grüße Waldläufer Oberberg
MatiMatix (2025-03-10 15:06:34+00:00): https://imgur.com/a/droga-zgoda-szkolna-rzJO9xj
NieWnen (2025-03-10 17:39:16+00:00): Dzięki za weryfikację!
Santi2222 (2025-04-08 11:11:09+00:00): Revertido, esta carretera no es autovía
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 17:40:34+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12650135803/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
sykul (2025-03-10 18:35:22+00:00): Bonjour. Le name:oc n'est-il pas correcte?
M GM (2025-03-11 08:12:58+00:00): Pas tout à fait, il vient d'être corrigé
sykul (2025-03-11 09:54:08+00:00): D'accord, merci pour le retour
Hufkratzer (2025-03-10 22:32:05+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1366005685 looks like an outdoor riding arena and not like a riding centre (centro equestre, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:leisure=horse_riding). In OSM riding arenas are usually tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1131292483
gabpr05 (2025-03-11 15:05:41+00:00): There are horses there, I know him in person. Although, I don't quite understand what you're referring to. What should I put in the edition search engine? Thanks
Hufkratzer (2025-03-11 21:35:12+00:00): Maybe the whole site, including the surrounding buildings, is an equestrian centre, I don't know; example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/863798326#map=18/39.667668/2.947887&layers=P

But the area https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1366005685 alone looks more like an outdoor riding arena. Riding arenas can belong to an equetrian centre or not. The current name "Caballos" does not seem to be a name of an equestrian centre.

If you search for "pista ecuestre" in iD you can chose from
* Pista de carrera ecuestre
and
* Pista ecuestre / Arena de rodeo
The first one is for horse racing, this is wrong here; the second one is what I think could fit here.

See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
gabpr05 (2025-03-11 22:46:38+00:00): Hello! Now I think it is correct as it is. Thanks for the advice. If there's anything else I can learn I'll be here. Do you happen to know when changes are published when users add/modify items on the OMS Open Map? Best regards
Hufkratzer (2025-03-11 22:54:23+00:00): Never heard of OMS Open Map before. Is that something new or what do you mean. Maybe this table can help:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Raster_tile_providers
gabpr05 (2025-03-11 22:58:03+00:00): I made a mistake, I meant OSM for short (OpenStreetMap). Regarding the other thing, what you would put for the farm where there are horses I understand
Hufkratzer (2025-03-12 20:57:32+00:00): Isn't https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12654002325 for the farm? That you can go horse riding there? Like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10624028670#map=19/38.260827/-0.534716&layers=P

If you mean the OSM Carto map (so-called Standard tile layer): The tiles on high zoom levels are rerendered very quickly (often in less than a minute), the other tiles may take some hours. But to see them quickly in the browser you have to update the browser cache (with Contl + F5 on Windows).
Hufkratzer (2025-03-12 22:21:04+00:00): I have seen, that you have retagged all the buildings of the farm from building=* to leisure=horse_riding (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163505278). This was a bad idea, imho, because
1. a building is a building and not a horse riding centre
2. every building must have a building tag, otherwise it is not rendered as a building
3. every horse riding centre should be represented by only one OSM object (node or area) and not by multiple objects, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding#When_not_to_use

For different kinds of buildings we have different building tags, e.g. building=stable, building=riding_hall, ...
Hufkratzer (2025-03-13 16:06:16+00:00): I have seen that you did some corrections, but
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1352419275 and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1352419277
are still incorrectly tagged as horse riding centres.
What are these areas?
JeroenHoek (2025-03-10 16:05:02+00:00): Hier pas je ook een bushalte in Leeuwarden aan. Is die nu in gebruik dan?
M_e_n_n_o (2025-03-10 17:25:26+00:00): Vergeten in de wijzigingen te noemen. De halte is inderdaad in gebruik.
JeroenHoek (2025-03-10 17:39:19+00:00): Voor welke lijnen? Die krijgen hem dan in de relatie namelijk.
JeroenHoek (2025-03-10 17:39:56+00:00): (En probeer niet een bushalte in Leeuwarden en wijzigingen in Terherne in één changeset te doen.)
M_e_n_n_o (2025-03-10 19:15:33+00:00): Was ook niet helemaal de bedoeling om het in één te doen. Was vergeten dat ik al iets in Leeuwarden had gedaan.

Lijnen zouden 1 en 95 moeten zijn
JeroenHoek (2025-03-10 19:34:07+00:00): Weet je het zeker? Ik kom die halte niet tegen in de dienstregeling:

https://fryslan.qbuzz.nl/lijn/f095?direction=1

Lijn 1 noemt al wel de nieuwe haltes bij Middelsee (die nu nog niet in gebruik zijn), maar niet Lynbaan.
M_e_n_n_o (2025-03-10 21:05:52+00:00): Dat maakt het verwarrend... Ik neem met enige regelmaat lijn 95. De halte Lynbaan is in de Arriva periode al toegevoegd. Ook nu wordt tijdens de busrit nog de halte Lynbaan genoemd.
JeroenHoek (2025-03-11 07:36:09+00:00): Ik zal in het OV-topic eens vragen of iemand andere data heeft dan wat op de websites staat. Dit is wel verwarrend inderdaad.
JeroenHoek (2025-03-11 07:43:37+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/algemeen-openbaar-vervoer-nl-topic/7050/203
M_e_n_n_o (2025-03-18 20:18:51+00:00): Inmiddels er achter gekomen dat de halte inderdaad niet meer in gebruik is. Heb hem weer aangepast.
JeroenHoek (2025-03-18 20:30:24+00:00): Netjes!
JJIglesias (2025-03-10 21:22:33+00:00): Why are you changing the roads inside  the private condominiums? all those ways have strict rules about speed, right of use, and priorities.

Did you live there of has been there anytime. If Not leave as they ARE.

One thing is that #ADT correct mistakes and errors in the map and another is MESS AROUND with what YOU DO NOT KNOW.

Thanks
Aralqum (2025-03-11 18:26:11+00:00): Hello, my colleague AzuisRiver has addressed your comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163435257 to keep the conversation in one thread, as it pertains to the same subject. Thanks!
Nathan_A_RF (2025-03-30 22:26:13+00:00): Hi, please make sure to update maxspeed:type tags when changing maxspeed tags. Thanks!
Andyp4777 (2025-03-31 16:01:59+00:00): Thanks! Will have a look.
silversurfer83 (2025-03-10 18:47:16+00:00): Moin Stefan :)

da ich grad von jemand anderem nach genau dieser Sache gefragt wurde: Es ist (fast) immer besser Gewerbe und Gebäude bei OSM getrennt zu halten. Die saubere Trennung erlaubt klareres Erfassen der Eigenschaften der jeweiligen Objekte ohne, dass es zu Missverständnissen kommt.

Daher meine Bitte für die Zukunft: Einfach einen eigenen Punkt für einen solchen Laden anlegen und dort die relevanten Infos ablegen.

Happy mapping
silversurfer83

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Ein_Objekt,_ein_OSM-Element
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163448877
silversurfer83 (2025-03-10 18:48:31+00:00): Hi :)

und hier noch der Hinweis, wie Öffnungszeiten korrekt erfasst werden:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

Wenn du dich an diese Syntax hälst sind sie auch für sehr viele Programme und Apps auswertbar :)

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163449083
eggie (2025-03-10 16:18:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 02:12:54+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164657866
infeeeee (2025-03-10 21:42:49+00:00): Szia!

Ha asztal is van, akkor azt piknikezőasztalként kell címkézni: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpicnic_table

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
silversurfer83 (2025-03-10 18:59:37+00:00): (Diese Kommentare sind keine Kritik an deiner Arbeit, sie sollen dir nur zeigen, wo du noch besser werden kannst. Also nicht persönlich nehmen)

Hi :)

Objekte, die Rund oder alternativ rechteckig sein sollen, kannst du nach dem Zeichnen und Einordnen mit der Taste "Q" rechtwinklig oder der Taste "O" rund machen. Sieht dann besser aus :)
Und als hilfreichen Hintergrund bei sowas kann ich die Liegenschaftskarte (ALKIS) empfehlen

Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163449429
Stefan Haeder (2025-03-11 09:07:32+00:00): Danke für die Hinweise!
MicDK (2025-03-13 10:04:13+00:00): Hello

You have deleted my mapping of the urban residential area Banevænget near Svendborg Vest. This is wrong, and has caused a lot of "blue needles" in Osmose.

You have mapped after old aerial photos instead of refraining from deleting my correct drawings, or map after the latest conditions on the site. Aerial photos from the fall of 2024 already show that the road Banevænget is partially built, and some homes have also been built.

I have inspected the site and for the time being limited myself to drawing the road as planned, and would return later instead of drawing the new buildings. Unfortunately, I now have to recreate what you have deleted without asking first. Please refrain from this kind of actions in the future.

MicDK
osmviborg (2025-03-13 10:19:22+00:00): Dit konstruktionsområde fyldte kun det halve område. Den ene af dine foreslåede veje var tegnet på tværs af soklerne på to af de halvfærdige huse. Besøg området igen.
osmviborg (2025-03-13 10:40:34+00:00): "blue needles"  i Osmose, de betyder at adresse- punkterne mangler en vej.
MicDK (2025-03-14 17:05:07+00:00): I think it would be helpful if you start by reading my comment and only then answer specifically.

I was still mapping this newly built area. Most of the buildings and roads are constructed today, but only some of them are shown in aerial photos from autumn 2024. I'm hesitant to mapping the whole area until we have even newer aerial photos from spring/summer 2025.

Your approach seems to be pure vandalism. Without any prior questions to men, just deleting my newer mapping, claim it was wrong and finally mapping the area again to make in render i OSM according to older outdated areal photos. 

Please refrain from this in the future.

(And by the way, I know what blue needles in Osmose means)
mueschel (2025-03-12 18:32:24+00:00): Hi,
"maxweight:left" is not a common tag - where does this maxweight apply?
didier2020 (2025-03-13 04:44:08+00:00): hi. It's a mistake =>  it's now fixed backward
Cipreste (2025-03-11 00:46:57+00:00): a way 1366019814 não é um prado, pode parecer assim nas imagens de 2018, mas há imagens mais recentes. por favor revê a definição de prado na wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:landuse%3Dmeadow e verifica se não há outros landuses errados (é difícil perceber as alterações feitas com os comentários genéricos)
TrickyFoxy (2025-03-10 22:52:23+00:00): 👋 Почему вы удалили здания? Они видны на снимках ESRI
Cipreste (2025-03-11 00:31:27+00:00): esta informação está errada, a ilha da rotunda não tem nem água nem jardim, é gravilha colorida, por favor corrige a edição
citrula (2025-03-10 19:35:29+00:00): you changed "Duck Pond Park" to a pond. Did you perhaps mean to name the pond "Duck Pond"?

I fixed the park, you can review it here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163457275
totera (2025-05-19 13:56:53+00:00): ANNCSU riporta "Via Conchiglia", quindi metterei name=Via Conchiglia e alt_name=Via della Conchiglia
f_gonella (2025-05-19 14:05:52+00:00): Corretto, grazie! Avresti pf il link ad ANNCSU?