piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
5m4u9 (2026-05-28 05:22:39+00:00): Hola, me olvidé mencionar, el ref de los light_rail es solo la primera letra, en todo lado usan números pero aquí se les ocurrió letras :/... está en los carros tranvías en una esquina por fuera donde conduce el maquinista, muy discreto.
eggie (2026-05-27 10:11:16+00:00): Welkom bij OSM..
Ale format is in het UK English.
Wanneer je deze tool gebruikt en de openingstijden invult krijg je wel de goede format.

openingsuren-tool

http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
MVG
eggie
5m4u9 (2026-05-28 04:19:17+00:00): Hola, hay varios cambios que retornaron al anterior que estaban mal... :(. nombres de operadores que estan escritos mal, PH en horarios del teleférico, los teleféricos no son buses :(, los colores inventados en los light_rail (no hay info oficial del color verde),
eggie (2026-05-27 10:16:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Volgens mij zijn fietsers hier niet toegestaan in deze tunnelbuis. Die is voor bromfietsen.
Mogen fietsers hier officieel doorheen nu?

Graag reactie. 

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Steef Zuid (2026-05-27 10:47:26+00:00): Ja, deze is toegangkelijk voor fietsers. In OSM staat een verbinding halverwege de toegangsweg tot de tunnelbuis, maar die komt uit op een doodlopend plateau en niet in de tunnelbuis zelf.
eggie (2026-05-27 10:51:17+00:00): Maar waarom staat dwarsstukje op bicycle en foot =no?
Steef Zuid (2026-05-27 11:43:51+00:00): Ik heb bicycle op no gezet omdat het voor geen enkele fietsroute zin heeft om het dwarsstukje (wat ook maar een paar meter is) op te gaan. Ik denk niet dat ik foot heb aangepast, maar dat weet ik niet helemaal zeker. Wat er, bij nader inzien, eigenlijk moet gebeuren is het dwarsstukje niet verbinden met het tunnelsegment. Die verbinding is er in werkelijkheid helemaal niet. Het dwarsstukje loopt dood op een plateau dat daar waarschijnlijk ligt voor onderhoudsdoeleinden.
eggie (2026-05-27 11:47:25+00:00): Oke.. dan aan een kant losmaken en op de eindnode noexit=yes taggen
Steef Zuid (2026-05-27 11:55:51+00:00): Ik zie rook dat het dwarsstukje relaties heeft met bicycle routes? Het gaat mijn prille kennis van de OSM editor te boven om in te schatten hoe ik dat op moet lossen en wat dat allemaal voor consequenties heeft, maar via het dwarsstukje kom je echt niet in de tunnel.
eggie (2026-05-27 12:04:33+00:00): Ik zal even naar de relatie kijken.
eggie (2026-05-27 12:11:48+00:00): Kennelijk was je bezig .. Ik kreeg een conklict. Even niet mappen dan kan ik de routerelaties omleggen
eggie (2026-05-27 12:17:20+00:00): Ik heb drie fietsrouterelaties omgeleid. Dat gaat overigens niet met editor iD. Alleen met editor JOSM.
eggie (2026-05-27 12:31:15+00:00): Het nieuwe traject staat nog wel op foot=no Geen idee of dat nog klopt?
StC (2026-05-27 21:17:18+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
trial (2026-06-08 20:54:45+00:00): Hallo, https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&way=1523447269#map=19/50.594496/11.249330 hat nichts mit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dcutline zu tun.
ticki_52 (2026-06-09 09:10:40+00:00): das ist richtig und korrigiert. flächen in dieser gegend können z.T. in einem Status "unfinished" sein und in den Prüf-Porgrammen zur Nachbearbeitung angezeigt werden. Bitte aktuell nicht kommentieren. Die Flächen und Wege werden so schnell wie möglich aktualisiert. Danke... ticki_52
streckenkundler (2026-06-09 09:22:38+00:00): @ticki_52
Bitte beteiligen:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/offensichtlich-problematische-bearbeitungen-im-thuringer-wald/144453/4
kingkingHK (2026-05-27 12:29:30+00:00): Imo the section without physical separation should not be drawn as two paralle lines, at most diagonal.
kingkingHK (2026-05-29 10:22:41+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183347374

------------

Quoting Kovoschiz from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180012342 :

> The gore sections shouldn't be parallel. They reflect how they are angled. It's not realistic to make it parallel, then suddently angled at the tip.

------------

I also deleted the non-existent turn restriction https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20751735

Same principle as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182773990 (btw, did you forget about sending the strongly-worded letter?)
vectorial8192 (2026-05-30 17:08:05+00:00): For the record, I am currently tracking 10+ topics that can be discussed at Discord, so no worries for that. I'm probably gonna do the topics one at a time, to prevent overload.

For this specific junction, the u-turn intended to describe the huge dash line area which does prevent legal u-turns. But yeah we can already describe that by traffic island extension.

There is no "greater context" for this specific junction, though if this is right outside of the roundabout, normally it just doesn't make sense for vehicles to immediately want an extra u-turn; just do it at the roundabout.
kingkingHK (2026-05-31 14:17:52+00:00): The "huge dash line area" is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1524312703 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1524312702 . By the time the two meet at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4781758456 , it has become dashed lines.

Again, "obviously" turn restrictions are for legal restrictions, not sensibility.
AndyB_66 (2026-05-28 06:29:38+00:00): Please use appropriate and meaningful comments for your changesets: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%B7%D0%BC%D1%96%D0%BD
arjunaraoc (2026-05-28 07:49:10+00:00): Hello Harsha514000, Your update on this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1523448002#map=19/16.403228/79.411148 does not align with the BIng image. Please fix the same immediately. Please add specific comments  for each of your changeset in future to enable review by other mappers.  In the past, accounts similar to your name have  not needed  suggestions or participated in the discussions. They were reported to DWG for necessary warnings/blocking. Hope you will heed the suggestions. Thanks.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183247818
infeeeee (2026-07-01 16:21:04+00:00): Szia!

crossing_ref=* helyett manapság a crossing:markings=* címkét használjuk, sokkal részletesebben le lehet írni felfestéseket.

A crossing_ref marad azokban az országokban ahol ezek az állatnevek használatban vannak, nálunk ilyenek nincsenek.

További jó térképezést!
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-27 18:24:15+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
is the name real?
Вышка сотовой связи я её руфнул (3253365462), v2
TrickyFoxy (2026-05-27 18:44:05+00:00): Reverted

https://osm.org/changeset/183270462
aaronq227 (2026-06-02 15:28:01+00:00): Hi NaufalFarras,
I noticed you have been changing several tertiary and secondary ways to primary. The OSM Wiki mentions that primary ways are "A major highway linking large towns. In cities, a major arterial road” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary). While secondary are "highways which are not part of major routes, but nevertheless form a link in the national route network” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary). Since several of these highways do link to the national network, but aren’t the major route, would you be open to providing resources you used to make these classification changes or changing these back? I also noticed you have been adding ref tags and I was wondering if you could share resources you used. Thank you for your time and I look forward to hearing from you.
NaufalFarras (2026-06-03 00:25:17+00:00): Hi. Thanks for noticing it.

These changes are based on discussions on Indonesian OSM community's Telegram group and monthly meeting. Though those discussions did not directly address Cimahi street classification issue, it solves some general classification issue for primary, secondary, tertiary, and residential highway tags. I (and some other contributors) have documented it in Indonesian language version of Indonesian Tagging Standard on OSM wiki. I have not translated it into English but planning to do so.

As you have stated earlier based on OSM wiki, OSM divides highway network classification into two: national/regional network ("primary" network in Indonesian regulation) and city/urban network ("secondary" network in Indonesian regulation). In Cimahi case, Kolonel Masturi, Gatot Subroto, Baros, and Nanjung streets are primary arterial roads to connect Cimahi with nearby towns. The rest of them are part of urban network. Panduan Penentuan Klasifikasi Fungsi Jalan di Wilayah Perkotaan is a good resource for this regulatory division.

For the street itself, I am using information from KEPUTUSAN GUBERNUR JAWA BARAT NOMOR : 620/Kep.883-DBMTR/2022 TENTANG RUAS JALAN DALAM JARINGAN JALAN PRIMER MENURUT FUNGSINYA SEBAGAI JALAN KOLEKTOR 2, JALAN KOLEKTOR 3, JALAN KOLEKTOR 4,
JALAN LOKAL, JALAN LINGKUNGAN, DAN JALAN SEKUNDER MENURUT
FUNGSINYA SEBAGAI JALAN ARTERI, JALAN KOLEKTOR, JALAN LOKAL DAN JALAN LINGKUNGAN (title so long I always forgot to put it into source box). It basically stores all notable street and road data in West Java. However, no one, including me, should follow that source blindly. It may contain some misinformation and typos, so local knowledge and direct survey is needed. In this case, I live a few km from this area and sometimes explored this city by motorcycle, so I somewhat know the street condition and traffic in this area.

I will gladly help if you want to discuss more.
NaufalFarras (2026-06-03 00:41:40+00:00): A more detailed explanation: classification for all streets/roads southwest of the national road is clear: they are big streets/road, busy, and connect two or more cities/towns.

Jalan Sangkuriang, Encep Kartawiria, and Wiganda Sasmita are also major streets, classified as arterial in Cimahi secondary network and busy.

Jalan Pasantren, Daeng Ardiwinata, Margaluyu, and others though are also part of Cimahi secondary arterial network, but narrower and less busy. Each have their own justification to be classified as highway=primary. However, highway=secondary could be used if they deemed too "unworthy."
aaronq227 (2026-06-04 18:19:25+00:00): Hi NaufalFarras,
Thank you for the thorough response, I agree with retaining Jalan Sangkuriang, Encep Kartawiria, and Wiganda Sasmita as highway=primary based on these resources. I believe changing Jalan Pasantren, Daeng Ardiwinata, Margaluyu to highway=secondary is reasonable with these streets being less busier and narrower, and to differentiate these highways from the primary ways in the area.
NaufalFarras (2026-06-04 18:35:32+00:00): Okay. Thanks
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:49:31+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185570831
neosalicious (2026-05-27 10:45:06+00:00): Review requested omdat ik niet weet of route S52-S54 nu nog wel goed loopt.
eggie (2026-05-27 11:14:41+00:00): Hoi,
Deze routerelatie S52-S54 is nog oke.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-05-27 11:16:19+00:00): Hoe komen fietsers van die trap af. Is er een gootje?
eggie (2026-05-27 11:23:01+00:00): Aan de oostkant lijkt een gootje te zitten als ik met Slagboom&Peeters kijk.
Dan ramp:bicycle=yes
neosalicious (2026-05-27 12:09:10+00:00): Goeie toevoeging! Ik ga straks even buiten nalopen of het klopt.
eggie (2026-05-27 12:21:31+00:00): Oke, maar ik heb niks toegevoegd,, Up to you. Meestal zet ik er ook nog bicycle=dismount op.
neosalicious (2026-05-27 12:28:24+00:00): Goeie toevoeging als in scherp opgemerkt
FajrAl (2026-05-30 02:21:54+00:00): Bangunan tidak perlu dijadikan multipolygon via relasi. Petakan saja seperti biasanya. Kecuali di bagian dalamnya ada outdoor, itu bisa pakai multipolygon.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:49:32+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185570831
A67-A67 (2026-05-27 20:46:35+00:00): In deze wijziging wordt de vervoerder van BravoFlex aangepast naar Qarin naar Hermes. Klopt dat wel? Flexbussen en buurtbussen worden wel vaker door andere vervoerders gereden dan de concessiehouder.
A67-A67 (2026-05-27 20:50:25+00:00): Ik heb het ook gevraagd aan de oorspronkelijke mapper: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182513718

Ik hoop niet dat dit weer klakkeloos overnemen van iD-suggesties was...
A67-A67 (2026-06-02 12:40:53+00:00): De vorige mapper bevestigt dat de vervoerder Qarin is en niet Hermes. Binnen een concessie kunnen lijnen onderaanbesteed wordt aan andere partijen dan de concessiehouder. Dus je hoort nooit iD-suggesties te gebruiken om de operator-tag te overschrijven. Eigenlijk zou de koppeling tussen network en operator sowieso ongedaan gemaakt moeten worden in de NSI.
A67-A67 (2026-06-02 12:41:16+00:00): Ik zal deze foutieve wijziging terugdraaien.
SekeRob (2026-05-27 18:04:23+00:00): Hi,

Went to read your past history communications to you. The German speaking sector was unhappy with you and a series of reverts took place of items you deleted particularly which exist both in Bing of whatever image tile date is on OSM and 2026 imagery. Noting this for the record so we have backup in that nothing has changed since years ago in what you practice A whole vineyard disappeared with everything in it... you seem to have a particular issue with scrub and trees and tree groups. Copying @DataWorkGroup @Woodpeck repair on this saga to expand awareness of the current affairs. You get comments and private messages and we know you receive them. You respond to none at all. That you may do, ignoring, but it does not make the problem go away. Todays issue with this completely unneeded edits and deletions... you got an issue with trees, scrub patches, road fringes, small farmland patches, anything that is not straight? Whatever, leave it alone, and I'm not saying please. If you can't, you might want to just concentrate on things you seem to do fine, albeit, deleting objects and than redrawing them as that may be convenient to you is a no-no. OSM wants preservation of history since when an object first entered the map to when it seizes to exist... for that there is lifecycle tagging, so the next mapper who uses different imagery does not think an object is missing and redraws it. Lifecycle tags make items invisible to the map but not to the mapper. At any rate. You are being watched until you find yourself in the department of blocked, your history shows you had several.
Now, collaborate, please, it is not your map where only your vision applies, it's everyone's.
Happy mapping
A67-A67 (2026-05-27 20:52:21+00:00): Hier weer de zoveelste fout door zonder te checken overnemen van iD-suggesties. Kijk aub even als je een Wikidata-tag aanpast, wat die items betekenen. Dan had je gezien dat je een huidige concessie naar een voormalige had veranderd.
A67-A67 (2026-05-27 20:54:07+00:00): Teruggedraaid
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:49:33+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185570831
tastrax (2026-05-28 04:03:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM - You have two hole number 7's. I didnt wantto edit in case handicap and par etc are different. I also removed par, handicap and ref from putting greens as its not required.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course
LoweCloudAgent (2026-05-28 09:01:02+00:00): Thanks Fixed
LoweCloudAgent (2026-05-28 09:03:19+00:00): Interesting is there a standard for that? Ive noticed golf courses are inconsistently mapped,
LoweCloudAgent (2026-05-28 09:05:23+00:00): Because ref is the hole number so now i need to build a hole downstream pipeline to figure out which hole that green belongs to.
tastrax (2026-05-29 00:01:43+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course for the best guidelines. generally in ID editor you will be presented with the fields that are best for each feature.
Konrad95 (2026-06-01 19:17:06+00:00): (komentarz do wszystkich dotychczasowych edycji)
Cześć,
na początek duża prośba – proszę czytać komentarze pod własnymi zmianami. Dzięki temu łatwiej uniknąć powtarzania tych samych błędów i dodatkowej pracy związanej z poprawianiem lub wycofywaniem edycji. W razie wątpliwości zawsze można wziąć udział w dyskusji.
Znaczna większość przystanków dodanych z tego konta dubluje przystanki już oznaczone w OSM. Należy edytować istniejący obiekt, a nie dodawać drugi. Wszystkie zdublowane przystanki muszą zostać usunięte.
Co do tagowania – nazwy typowo urzędowe, zawierające np. numer posesji, jeśli nie występują w rozkładach jazdy, nie powinny znajdować się w tagu name=*, a ewentualnie w official_name=*. W tagu name=* umieszczamy nazwę widoczną na przystanku lub w rozkładzie jazdy.
Nie jest też właściwe stosowanie network=Gmina Tarczyn. Jeśli gmina Tarczyn zarządza przystankami (np. znajdują się one przy drogach gminnych albo zawarto odpowiednią umowę z zarządcą drogi), można ewentualnie rozważyć użycie operator=Gmina Tarczyn. Jest to jednak problematyczne, ponieważ często trudno zweryfikować faktycznego zarządcę przystanku, a nie wszystkie dokumenty związane z zarządzaniem przystankami są publicznie dostępne.
Tag network=* dotyczy sieci autobusowej i powinien być taki sam jak na relacjach linii autobusowych. Linie autobusowe w gminie Tarczyn są częścią sieci PKS Grójec i są już w ten sposób otagowane. Sam fakt organizowania przewozów przez gminę nie jest wystarczającą podstawą do "wydzielenia" odrębnej sieci.
mavl (2026-06-10 06:18:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906066 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20776].
mavl (2026-06-10 06:44:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906936 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping.
mavl (2026-06-10 06:18:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906066 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20776].
mavl (2026-06-10 06:44:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906936 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping.
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-27 18:12:39+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the name real?
decomissioned (865303246), v2
Drthunder (2026-05-27 18:20:24+00:00): Afternoon -

There is no road name...it's not even a road anymore.. I only put decommissioned to ensure someone had context that this was once a driveway for a building, but that building no longer exists.
mavl (2026-06-10 06:18:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906066 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20776].
mavl (2026-06-10 06:44:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906936 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping.
WoSoe (2026-05-28 04:40:27+00:00): Moin Cuberino,

es tut mir leid, aber ich musste deinen Datensatz zurücksetzen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183283862

Es waren mehrere Administrative Grenzen unterbrochen. Die östliche Bahnbrücke über die Saale war nach Norden verschoben.
Die Bahnbrücke Unterkotzau ist immer noch gesperrt. Siehe:
https://www.hof.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Bilder_Bauen_und_Wirtschaft/stadthof-baustellen-im-stadtgebiet-hof-in-2026.jpg
Mehrere doppelte Straßen östlich der Bahnbrücke.

Gruß
WoSoe
Cuberino (2026-05-28 15:39:31+00:00): Servus und danke.
Ja es sind viele Fehler in Hof und Umgebung, Linien die mit Straßen und Bahnschinen verknüpft sind. Ja da hab ich wohl nich alles richtig gemacht. Ist auch das erste mal das ich dieses Durcheinander gehabt habe. 
Zur Brücke. Warum die Stadt hof das mach ist totaler Unsinn. Es sind Parken die zu kurz sind und Fußgänger und Radfahrer durchfahren können. Würde hier wirklich eine Gefahr bestehen müsste es anders gesperrt werden. 
Der Radverkehr in Hof ist eh der schlechteste in Bayern und diese Brücke ist wichtig um nicht auf Bundesstraßen fahren zu müssen. 
Ja wenn es hier so genau genommen wird und nicht doch wenigstens für Rad und Fuß freigegeben wird, akzeptiere ich das. Danke für deine Arbeit.
Dindia (2026-05-28 08:16:18+00:00): You create a duplicate bridge 2 hours after me and then erase  my changes with "Deleted a duplicate bridge"
Seriously?
eggie (2026-05-27 12:18:36+00:00): noexit=yes toegevoegd.. Anders een foutmelding almost junction
eggie (2026-05-27 12:19:59+00:00): Dat noexit=yes zetten we in de regl op de eindnode. Dus niet op het wegelement.
Al die accesstags heb ik verwijderd
Steef Zuid (2026-05-27 12:21:49+00:00): Oh super, weer wat geleerd!
mavl (2026-06-10 06:18:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906066 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20776].
mavl (2026-06-10 06:44:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906936 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping.
mavl (2026-06-10 06:17:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906066 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20776].
mavl (2026-06-10 06:44:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906936 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping.
silversurfer83 (2026-05-27 16:38:27+00:00): Hallo Thomas (ich nehme an, dass der Firmeninhaber hier aktive wurde),

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)
Schön, dass du dich selbst um deine Firma kümmerst.

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand deine Änderung ansieht. Da sie noch nicht optimal ist, möchte ich erstmal eine Rückfrage stellen: Können Menschen Holz bei dir abholen oder lieferst du auschließlich?

Grüße

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183253073
Brennholzscout (2026-05-27 18:45:45+00:00): Ja Kunden könnten bei mir auch Brennholz holen, jedoch ist das Lager nicht an dieser Adresse. Die NEU-Kunden kommen immer erstmal zu mir  "Zum Toracker 15" und dann fahren wir zusammen zum Lager. Ich möchte nicht, dass das Lager öffentlich im Web zu sehen ist, denke das ist verständlich, oder ?
Liebe Grüße und danke für Deine Nachfrage.
Thomas
rajdhani (2026-05-28 04:48:59+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 183284456
gurglypipe (2026-05-27 12:58:54+00:00): Hiya, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for trying to improve the map in your area :)

I’ve tweaked your changes because I think what was here was tagged correctly already. access=no on the bridge should mark it as out of use (to vehicles and pedestrians).

If people are continuing to be routed over it, that’s likely from them using an out of date map or satnav data.

We don’t delete or remove all the tags from features which are currently out of use. Instead we add tags (like access=no or lifecycle prefixes, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix) to describe the current state of the feature and hence why it’s out of use.

Hope that makes sense, happy to discuss more if you have questions :) Please do help improve the map in your local area more!