piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
clamemmel (2024-11-09 13:32:53+00:00): achso, eine Frage noch: Wenn ich mir deine Einträge anschaue, ist Folgendes richtig hinterlegt?

Sonntags zu den angegebenen Uhrzeiten ist es natürlich auch nur geöffnet in den Monaten Mai-Mitte September.
mcliquid (2024-11-09 15:05:48+00:00): Ich hab den gesamten Badeberich als umschließendes Multipolygon angelegt und die Öffnungszeiten darauf übertragen.

Ich hab die Angabe "ganze Saison" auf das "ganze Jahr" verstanden. Habe es entsprechend korrigiert.
clamemmel (2024-11-09 15:54:00+00:00): Danke dir!
mcliquid (2024-11-09 15:55:18+00:00): Sehr gerne :) Schönes Wochenende!
eggie (2024-10-30 15:22:31+00:00): Dag Kalminion.. Zou het pad ook anders kunnen lopen?
Wat is je bron hier? 
Ik gebruik een recentere luchtfoto. Ook is het pad ingetekend in de BGT.
MVG
eggie
Kalminion (2024-10-30 15:38:28+00:00): ik loop hier regelmatig met de hond :)
Gebied is onderdeel van de toekomstige Parkstadroute. Op het forum was hierover discussie, hoe een mogelijke toekomstige verandering aan te geven, o.a. door MadelNL. Conclusie: niet de plannen, maar de werkelijke situatie aanhouden.
eggie (2024-10-30 15:52:54+00:00): De hond zal ongetwijfeld de weg weten 😀
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-10-30 19:28:51+00:00): Please also remove 
sport=bowling
tag from the bowling if it's no longer there.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/79299949
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-10-30 19:26:45+00:00): Hi, looks like you've made a bus stop a part of bus pavilion. It's better to put it in the center or in front of it.
Kovoschiz (2024-10-30 19:48:03+00:00): Please don't upload personal edits to a live public database. This is vandalism. I only see you mass deleting features that shouldn't be removed, and you should still change stores to a plain "point" when they change hands..
Kovoschiz (2024-10-30 19:44:42+00:00): 1. Or you can try to reply, instead of using upload comment as your personal announcements? 
2. And why not use `=track` ? 
3. `=pedestrian` has been used across HK. Given the lack of `=track` in HK (many existing are also misuse from the "single-track access road term, which should be `=unclassified` , `=residential` , and `=service` ) , it's unclear how it should be used. `=pedestrian` fit the mainly pedestrian use definition, connects between `=service` , and ties with actual park EVA.
Joseph R P (2024-11-06 04:49:55+00:00): Hello, Route 606 here should not be trunk as it does not serve as a major interregional route like Fairfax County Parkway or Route 50 do. The best classification here would be primary.
Dodko (2024-11-13 09:22:17+00:00): Obec neschválila názov ulice Školská, ani obyvatelia na občianskych preukazoch nemajú uvedenú takú ulicu.
Prečo ste ju menili?
https://www.novalesna.sk/vznc--6-2023-o-urceni-nazvu-ulic-a-cislovani-stavieb-v-obci-2023-6-2023-vzn/mid/504466/.html
aceman444 (2025-02-25 06:44:56+00:00): Tento pouzivatel robi len taketo zmeny a neodpoveda na komentare. Kludne to vratte spat.
eggie (2024-10-30 15:28:31+00:00): Dag Hoeve.. Je hebt nu de hele hoeve verwijderd door de buildingtag building=house te verwijderen.
CTRL F5 voor het actuele effect
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=158546718

MVG
eggie
BCNorwich (2024-10-30 17:24:40+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It's OSM practice not to map a feature twice. So if the museum is a business within this building it should be mapped/tagged as a node only, leaving the building mapped/tagged with only the building info. If the museum the whole building then the building is mapped/tagged as the business, there should not be a node mapped as well. I've amended the tags to reflect the former option. If this is incorrect please say and I'll amend further.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2024-11-02 18:34:52+00:00): I found the website, looks like it's the whole building, consolidated tags on building
empty_child (2024-10-31 11:49:18+00:00): Привет
Если что, я покрывал Батуми в OpenAerialMap с дрона, там выше разрешение, но скачет смещение
eggie (2024-10-30 15:56:24+00:00): Dag Hoeve.. Elk begin is moeilijk.
Hier heb je de nieuwbouw verwijderd door de building= te verwijderen.
Dat dus terugzetten en farmyard verwijderen.
De farmyard is het erf zelf.
Gr eggie
c3112n (2024-10-30 18:16:55+00:00): Danke, D.!
D R Syfydrin (2024-11-01 20:36:10+00:00): Parson's Bridge
D R Syfydrin (2024-11-01 17:57:39+00:00): Parson's bridge
bhietsch (2024-11-11 16:32:27+00:00): To my knowledge, this trail has not yet been constructed and is still in its planning phase. I would suggest reverting this changeset or changing to access=no until construction is complete to avoid confusing unaware cyclists and pedestrians
eggie (2024-10-30 17:21:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Wanneer er geen hek meer is kan het inderdaad weg.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-30 15:51:41+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Czubińskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2473138129
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12299715203
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12299715204
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12299715205
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12299715206

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-11-03 00:38:45+00:00): Poprawione.
eggie (2024-10-30 17:23:18+00:00): Lijkt me oke.. Je hebt ook een infoboard verplaatst. k Weet niet of dat de bedoeling was?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=158548153

MVG
eggie
Jeroen1 (2024-10-30 17:47:12+00:00): Voor mij is het nog even uitzoeken hoe het hier werkt. Dat infobord stond zoals ik het zag, sowieso verkeerd. Binnenkort ga ik wel even  kijken hoe het exact zit. Dan zal ik dit als nodig, nog aanpassen.

Betreft het nieuwe pad. Dit is een nieuw natuurgebiedje sinds een paar jaar. Wil dit binnenkort nog even beter uitwerken omdat er nog meer paden zijn. De paden zijn ook te zien op Earth View in het bewerkingsscherm. Hoop dat ik het zo goed benoem en dat je weet wat ik hiermee bedoel. 

Met vriendelijke groet, Jeroen
eggie (2024-10-30 18:16:53+00:00): Yep... Er zijn voor Nederland ook recentere PDOK foto's. Ook Satellietdataportaal geeft recente info.
Veel plezier met mappen.
eggie
Jeroen1 (2024-10-30 18:51:30+00:00): Wat is hiervoor een goede bron? De Luchtfoto van PDOK.nl?
Wat is het verschil tussen Satellietdataportaal.nl en PDOK.nl? Zoals ik het nu inschat is de luchtfoto van PDOK.nl het meest recent en beste bron?
eggie (2024-10-30 19:04:13+00:00): https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.39468,6.196815,17/?datastrip=20240915_PNEO-04

en 

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/de-beste-imagery-layers-om-nl-osm-te-mappen-met-josm/85393

In editor JOSM heb je recentere PDOK foto's. Die in iD is gedateerd. Die wordt pas uitgerold als heel Nederland is gefotografeerd en dat is nog niet het geval. 
Voor dit stukje maakt het niet veel uit. Daar is de laatste PDOK ook redelijk recent.

Het verschil is dat sat dataportaal een satellietfoto is en PDOK opnames vanuit een vliegtuigje.

Verder gebruik ik OBLIEK foto's van Slagboom&Peeters. Daar kun je een licentie voor krijgen als OSM-mapper.
OBLIEK foto's zijn aangevlogen van vier zijden met 45gr opnamen.
Jeroen1 (2024-10-31 21:16:10+00:00): Kun je ook zien wie het infobord heeft verplaatst of geplaatst? Bedoel diegene die dat voor mij heeft gedaan.
eggie (2024-10-31 21:31:56+00:00): Yep... Dan toets ik na selectie ctrl H in.
Maar dat is met editor josm.
Dan zie je de historie. Tot jaren terug.
Mn laptop staat uit. Het is in iD ook zo n combinatie met de H toets.
eggie (2024-10-31 21:34:12+00:00): Ctrl -shift- H
Jeroen1 (2024-10-31 21:47:52+00:00): Dankje!
silversurfer83 (2024-10-30 20:45:17+00:00): Moin ukrum,

danke, dass du die Datenbank aktuell hälst und dem Umzug domkumentiert hast.

Kannst du bitte noch die Adresse des von dir verschobenen Punktes anpassen? Aktuell ist noch die Oeventroper Str. hinterlegt.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158548255
ukrum (2024-10-30 21:23:58+00:00): Hallo,
danke für den Hinweis. Wenn man denkt mal eben. Habe es gerade erledigt.
LG Ulf
D R Syfydrin (2024-11-01 20:35:52+00:00): Removed my edit
eggie (2024-10-30 17:45:09+00:00): 👍
eggie (2024-10-31 06:57:14+00:00): Tip. De naam van het bedrijf kan wellicht beter op het vlak van het erf.
..name= op een gebouw is bedoeld voor de gebouwnaam zelf.
Gr eggie
Tomas_J (2024-10-30 16:13:33+00:00): Hi, the general names like "Telecommunication tower", "Factory" etc. can not be placed to the NAME tag, but at most maybe to the DESCRIPTION tag or similar. You did it in this case and also in many others.  I deleted the name tag.
peanutnutt (2026-04-17 02:12:03+00:00): The name of the building is not Salim Tower. Could you please update it to Menara Indomaret? Thanks in advance
D R Syfydrin (2024-11-01 20:35:31+00:00): Shed
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-30 16:31:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12299765939
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12299765940

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
gsapijaszko (2024-11-02 16:19:24+00:00): dzięki, poprawione.
D R Syfydrin (2024-11-01 18:00:48+00:00): Updated road based on surveying the area and aerial imagery.
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-31 15:32:43+00:00): TJ removed.  Replaced Staples instead.
BCNorwich (2024-10-30 19:46:49+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OenStreetMap.

You mapped the business on a block of terrace houses. From your website I found the correct place of the business and placed a node there.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2024-10-30 19:47:20+00:00): Oh I reverted your changes.
D R Syfydrin (2024-10-30 16:27:31+00:00): Local*
eerib (2024-10-30 20:12:02+00:00): Hello mycontactname,

I originally named this orchard as "White Swan Public Orchard" as that was the name used in the numerous marketing and development materials presented by the developer John Reid. This name was also frequently used in stories within the Bowen Island Undercurrent.

I checked the parcel ownership and it shows as Strata Common Property, so perhaps "public" in the name is not correct anymore. I checked the latest materials from the developer and the name "White Swan Orchard" and "Orchard" are used.

The most common name appears to be "White Swan Orchard" so as a result I've switched it to that while also keeping the name you added as the alternative name.

If you know if the "White Swan" naming is no longer going to be used going forward then please do change the name again. For searchability and emergency purposes you can also add the old name using the "old_name" tag.

Thank you, eerib
mycontactname (2024-10-31 02:21:19+00:00): Thanks for the explanation, eerib.
We'll leave it as-is for now (your wording).
EjtRpnbFwWeO (2024-10-30 16:46:07+00:00): תקין
MagdalenThot (2025-02-14 20:40:27+00:00): Hi Ron, please remap these buildings and your other changesets as well when you get the time ans ensure that you hit "Q" after you map a building. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158549919
EjtRpnbFwWeO (2024-10-30 16:46:27+00:00): תקין
Nathan_A_RF (2024-11-01 15:54:37+00:00): The tag "maxspeed:type=GB:zone30" is not valid. Please see the wiki page for valid tags: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:type#United_Kingdom
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-04 09:52:07+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11645817997/history has building:name = A casa da Amélia that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Is building:name for building name? In such case it would be much better to put it into name tag. If this object merges builing and POI inside such as museum or shop, then having separate objects for point of interest and building would be better idea, museum may have own area or node (see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element ).

If it is an inscription then it should use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:inscription

If that is not a building name - what you wanted express by this tagging?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-04 13:59:51+00:00): Also, do you really think that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11645817997/history is a building?
Telegram Sam (2024-11-04 20:48:20+00:00): Hey Mateusz.

The building tag was already part of the marketplace node when I edited it. I didn't want to remove tags I couldn't verify so I left the building tag as is.

I interpreted "A casa da Amélia" as being the name of the building, so I included this information as best I could while fixing the incorrect building tag.

I realize this format is breaking the one feature one element rule, but I  didn't want to risk losing the information on the node when I can't verify the area physically.

What do you think I should do to fix the node?
MM 喵了个 (2026-06-17 18:36:27+00:00): 这里光华厂/新西北片区的铁路可能不止西户线那么简单……
比如说这条铁路的货运属性
～到红光路阿房路口那段支线
EjtRpnbFwWeO (2024-10-30 17:12:05+00:00): תקין
Baloo Uriza (2024-10-30 18:04:46+00:00): Looks like name=Pump Track should probably be description=Pump track instead.  The name should only be the name, if it doesn't have one, then noname=yes can be applied to clarify that it has no name, not that it's unknown.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158550641
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 01:36:36+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164876874
birdlawyer (2024-10-30 20:45:59+00:00): Hello, and thanks for your interest in OSM. It appears that the features you're mapping do not exist in reality and so I've reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158556171. Please refrain from mapping features that do not exist on the ground. You can learn more about making accurate and appropriate contributions to OpenStreetMap at https://learnosm.org/. However, if you're more interested in creative mapping, I'd recommend checking out https://www.opengeofiction.net. Happy mapping!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-31 23:31:29+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158601444
YorkiePudd (2024-10-31 23:34:59+00:00): Why did you revert it, it's how the two roads meet and connect
SomeoneElse (2025-02-07 10:50:01+00:00): @Spaghetti Monster:
Just for info, Hall Ings was a pedestrian route round a building site the last time I was there (a few months ago), 
I would assume that any imagery bears no relation to current layout.  It really needs input from people on the ground.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-07 13:03:01+00:00): Other discussions:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158189468
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150275508
I don't remember exactly why I reverted this.
SomeoneElse (2025-02-07 14:00:13+00:00): Apparently a "phased reopening" of the bus station is underway (see https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn5w2qqk526o - started early Jan, to complete in April).
I'm guessing based on that that a certain amount of development work is still incomplete - hopefully someone passing through one of the stations (or someone local) can nip out and have a look.
EjtRpnbFwWeO (2024-10-30 17:21:39+00:00): תקין
jandar22 (2024-12-03 17:03:49+00:00): When buildings have recently been demolished but are still visible on most aerial imagery, it is good to retain the feature on the map as a note to mappers. However, the appropriate tag for such a feature is building:demolished=*. It looks like the building was tagged as landuse=farmyard and given a note in its name field, which is improper. I have corrected the tagging in changeset 159889477. Thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158551966
Maryna Makarava (2024-10-30 17:34:52+00:00): Also geometry of residential road was corrected
literan (2025-01-22 11:20:11+00:00): простите, а что это за фейк-школа? ни на снимках от лета 2024, ни на панорамах от лета 24 года ничего подобного нет, никаких театров, никаких зданий такой формы - тут футбольное поле

https://www.google.com/maps/@55.5554368,37.5041113,406m/data=!3m1!1e3?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDEyMC4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D

https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CHaCEQmQ
literan (2025-01-22 17:19:08+00:00): Правка откачена
EjtRpnbFwWeO (2024-10-30 17:50:09+00:00): תקין
richplane (2024-12-09 15:16:04+00:00): I think you've marked the whole road as being a 'gate' rather than adding a gate to the road. Will try to fix this.
Adam UK (2024-12-09 17:41:42+00:00): Thank you if you can !
AllenLeonard (2024-10-30 19:28:45+00:00): The edit is accurate
Nakaner-repair (2026-04-30 11:18:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 182028718 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user user_1890314. Reason: low quality contributions with Orgnaic Maps, personal notes, disrespect towards other mappers
limes11 (2026-03-17 19:15:36+00:00): Hallo, 

Hier wird in einem Hinweis gefragt, warum dies kein hw=residential sei. Ich frage mich eher, wieso dies nach Jahren auf unclassified geändert wurde. Das Stück ist 20 m lang und für PKW gesperrt. Wieso sollte das eher ein hw=unclassified als ein hw=service sein ? "highway=unclassified kennzeichnet für den öffentlichen motorisierten Verkehr freigegebene Nebenstraßen und Fahrwege mit Verbindungscharakter" passt hier überhaupt nicht.

Grüße
ManuelB701 (2026-03-18 06:49:28+00:00): Die Straße ist zwar für den allgemeinen motorisierten Verkehr gesperrt, ist aber immer noch Straße mit Verbindungscharakter für andere Fahrzeuge wie Fahrräder und Busse (gerade, da hier bis zu fünf Buslinien fahren und hier zudem ein Zeichen 245 angebracht ist).
Vielmehr aber ist die definition von highway=service, dass man damit z.B. ein Grundstück erreicht, was hier aber nicht gilt, da man hier kein Grundstück direkt erreichen kann, sondern nur noch mehr Straße und gerade deswegen hier highway=unclassified angebracht ist.

Außerdem ist das nicht die einzige Straße, dieser Art. Es gibt auch noch den Münsterplatz (nur für Busse und Tram befahrbar), die ebenfalls highway=unclassified statt highway=service ist.

Man könnte hier alternativ hgihway=busway wählen, das passt in dem Fall aber nicht, weil es das 245 hier als Filter fungiert, nicht als Kennzeichen eines (de facto) Busstreifens (gerade als eigenständiger Weg und weil dieser Fahrräder und Taxen erlaubt).
EjtRpnbFwWeO (2024-10-30 18:51:28+00:00): .
zstadler (2025-06-09 20:55:57+00:00): היי צור,

על פי כללי המיפוי
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#Trail_relations
צריך להשתמש באותיות קטנות לשם ה operator:

operator=kkl
ולא
operator=KKL
zstadler (2025-06-09 20:56:39+00:00): היי צור,

על פי כללי המיפוי
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#Trail_relations
צריך להשתמש באותיות קטנות לשם ה operator:

operator=kkl
ולא
operator=KKL
Tsur Halamish (2025-06-10 06:23:43+00:00): תודה על ההסבר אלא שכאן יש אותיות קטנות בתיוג. אני מוצא אותיות גדולות רק בכינוי שנתתי ל changeset 
שזה להבנתי לא מהותי
zstadler (2025-06-10 12:17:32+00:00): בעריכה הזו, כתבת KKL. זה נשאר עד אתמול שכשתיקנתי בכל הארץ

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167418113

כתבתי לך על מנת שתשים לב בעתיד

אגב, בטעות זה נשלח פעמיים
EjtRpnbFwWeO (2024-10-30 18:51:35+00:00): .
toyotagps (2024-11-01 01:57:19+00:00): Здравствуйте. А как открытие обхода связано с понижением статуса дороги через город со стороны Красноярска в сторону Новокузнецка. В корне не согласен.
D R Syfydrin (2024-11-01 17:56:02+00:00): Updated path direction and a few more things.
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-31 16:21:06+00:00): Edit reviewed.  good edit
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158554412
thedukeofmountdeer (2024-10-30 18:37:43+00:00): https://thedukeofmountdeer.com/
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1XHbs82Kdv5CGkMXDOsW8Z56OjBiWEe1f
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/175fOERNRmtvy3H82tM0z8U2T-B4DCd0GZJDguRIkxkw/edit?usp=drivesdk
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1A_1ZJTq-kyEMRQOpSPKkqWPMrBOaslqP
https://sites.google.com/view/thedukeofmountdeer/
https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1s_HbKRzRfpN9yG47IZ3f-4eQUq5d5qU
https://thedukeofmountdeer.blogspot.com/2024/10/789win.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Cti9SZK_dk
https://x.com/thedukeofmount/status/1851690691828814262
https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/789win3/episodes/789Win-L-G--Tt-C-V-Nh-Ci-Uy-Tn-789Win-e2qbk5a
https://www.scoop.it/topic/789win-by-789win-52/p/4162069662/2024/10/31/kham-pha-the-gioi-giai-tri-tai-789win-casino-truc-tuyen
EjtRpnbFwWeO (2024-10-30 18:51:50+00:00): .
D R Syfydrin (2024-11-01 17:55:04+00:00): Added ruins
Rindinadya (2025-01-07 09:41:22+00:00): Hello Allison P!
Could you please confirm if these roads are already fully used by cars?
- North Sepino Avenue
- West Wapoot Street
- North Corbell Avenue
- North Bartok Avenue.
I have feedback from a driver who says this road is not driveable yet. You have changed the classification from 'construction' to 'residential'. Perhaps you are a local resident and know what is really going on. On the Esri World Imagery (Jan 30, 2024) - the roads were not yet passable. Could you please share information about these roads. 
Best regards.
Allison P (2025-01-07 10:42:24+00:00): I have not visited the site since 2021, so I do not have local knowledge. The classification is based on publication of the final plat for Pera Place Subdivision on October 29, 2024. This is newer than the imagery. Access the plat here: https://adacountyassessor.org/docs/subdivisionplats/sub21000

Files: S2105701.tif through S2105705.tif

Use the parcel photos from the assessor's interactive map to verify that the road is complete. Example: https://apps.adacounty.id.gov/PropertyLookup/PropertyDetails?parcel=R6991101220&year=2025

Roads may be blocked in whole or in part while homes are under construction, but that would not be reflected in access tags or classification.
Rindinadya (2025-01-07 21:44:39+00:00): Thank you for your reply.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-30 18:51:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Perkoza":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12300028234
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12300028271
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12300028273

"Łabędzia":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12300028264
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12300028266

"Zięby":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12300028267

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
gsapijaszko (2024-11-02 16:13:14+00:00): dzięki, poprawione
D R Syfydrin (2024-11-01 17:54:34+00:00): Added Building
mweper (2024-10-30 23:32:23+00:00): Hola. He mejorado un poco el PDI, añadiendo el sitio web y una categoría. Si tienes más información, puedes añadirla o contáctame y lo haré por ti. Saludos.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-10-30 19:15:42+00:00): Further reading:
 * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jz-bRjCmBGM
* https://www.city.sumida.lg.jp/matizukuri/matizukuri_suisin/zigyoubetu/tetsudo_rittaika/tobu_rittaika/index.html
Lostmonkey (2024-12-03 09:34:02+00:00): Er relationen '17 Verdensmål gavlmalerier' en officiel (skiltet/afmærket) vandrerute?
Leif Lodahl (2024-12-03 20:14:51+00:00): Ja, se URL-reference på relationen.
Lostmonkey (2024-12-03 20:21:28+00:00): Jeg har kigget på den hjemmeside, men kan kun se et kort med placering af vægmalerierne? Kan ikke finde noget om nogen afmærket rute. Kun en henvisning til en guidet tur med Aarhus Guiderne.