piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Ziqgy (2023-05-10 13:49:40+00:00): OK, das war klar, dass die Objekte wie das kleine, schmale Türmchen deutlich kleiner sind, und damit quasi unsichtbar für die Makroansicht erscheinen. Die bewusste "Vergrößerung" des Objektes sollte dazu dienen, dass das Objekt "sichtbar" und anklickbar wird. Um genau zu sein, kann man dies natürlich dabei belassen, wenn die genauen Daten vorhanden sind. Jedenfalls sollten die Abmessungen in die Referenzen eingetragen werden, sowie auch die Höhe, Stufenanzahl etc.pp.
Frans S (2023-04-20 12:40:08+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. However, A few issues.
When an object don't show a shadow, mostly it is not a building. 
Please follow the rooflines more accurate. Include extensions and corners.


Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135147717
Frans S (2023-04-20 12:37:48+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings not accurate (following rooflines) mapped.
Included the shadow into your mapping. 



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135147733
Frans S (2023-04-20 12:36:41+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings not accurate mapped and squared.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135147749
Frans S (2023-04-20 12:35:48+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are rather accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
connected nodes of buildings to each other.
Buildings not squared.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135147762
map per (2023-04-26 13:11:33+00:00): Wegen "meine Änderung Überprüfen":
Sieht gut aus, danke!
d_berger (2023-04-20 22:29:57+00:00): Review: stop clicking 'yes' on each and every SUGGESTION(!) that iD makes. "Suggestion" means: get your ass on the ground and confirm locally(!!!1). And if you don't know what the suggestion means, or aren't able to map the change manually (without help) by yourself, you shouldn't change it.

This is a changeset that a bot could have made. I'll wait for other comments, but this is far from acceptable. Learn the ropes, read the wiki, interact with the community. It's not the first time you get feedback for not getting acquainted with local rules, but just doing what iD suggests. You may waste your time if you feel like it, but please don't waste my time or the time of other mappers. TY
Tursiops33 (2023-04-21 06:43:22+00:00): Hello and thank you for your message, but i would like to defend myself. When i add details to crossings, and do it consistently for dozens of them, and then get 180 warnings, not suggestions, but warnings, meaning there's something wrong, i can't just submit my changes without addressing those. Most changes i've made to this are crossings of roads or walkpaths to the tram rails, so shouldn't those have crossings and be marked as such ? Yes i'm new here and i'm learning, but please be a bit more constructive with your critisim, i can take it and want to improve but saying i do a shitty job is not going to help anyone. Thanks!
d_berger (2023-04-21 10:57:51+00:00): First some common sense: we map tracks (railway, tram) separate from the highway elements even if in the real world they actually share the same space. The highway element in itself is an abstraction (a line representing an area). So just because those lines are crossing in OSM, they don't constitute a crossing – again they share the same space.

But it's editors like iD, that can't make sense of it, and expect something that doesn't exist in the real world. In the shared space, where tram tracks occupy the same space, there is simply no such thing as a "tram_level_crossing", that's a spam tag to make iD shut up. It doesn't improve mapping a bit.
d_berger (2023-04-21 11:03:47+00:00): Second, traffic_signals are mapped like documented in the wiki[1], in Zürich the last two schemes are in use. Mostly the one with the traffic_signal and the crossing on the same node. There aren't additional traffic signals on the footways, and we don't map physical locations of the traffic_signals.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals
d_berger (2023-04-21 11:15:44+00:00): Don't put a layer on a highway, just because iD suggest it. It just conceals errors. There might be a building_passage missing. That's again something to make iD shut up, it doesn't improve anything. Same goes for noexit=yes, that's a tag to suppress warnings, it seldom improves mapping.
d_berger (2023-04-21 12:32:20+00:00): And also please don't add defaults. On crossing=unmarked the addition of crossing:markings=no is redundant. On 'Trottoirüberfahrt' (not sure how it translates, ask Google for pictures) it's physically impossible to have a crossing:island. The default is always "crossing:island=no", it's just the questmakers that loath the idea of implicit defaults. We generally define objects by what they are (*=yes), and not by what they aren't, because that would be an endless list of useless data. With explicit sidewalk mapping, we have (ten-)thousands of "crossing", that aren't real crossings but just an acknowledgement, that a road passes over a sidewalk (pedestrian priority, and vehicles have to give way). This requires to think about mapping, and not just add tags because iD or StreetComplete suggest them.

Use the tag crossing:island only where crossing islands actually exist – however if the highway element is split around such islands "crossing:island=yes" is incorrect, because the node only represents the segment leading to the crossing island. That's again abstraction: you have an unsplitted way – you have to do an abstraction and get to add island=yes; you have a splitted way – no abstraction anymore and no island tag to add.

Also: a crossing island (or transit stop island) is _not_ a traffic calming element, this one[2] is. And here again: if the highway elements are splitted around, you don't get to tag it, because traffic_calming tags are designed as an abstract (node) in another abstract (way).


[2] https://maps.zh.ch/s/plxyespw
SekeRob (2023-05-27 17:47:25+00:00): Hi,

Seeing you all over the planet, could you provide some after-care on this one, plz. You fixed 1 issue, the summary says you left 4 hanging.

thanks and ciao
Frans S (2023-04-20 12:56:11+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Sorry to say, but your mappings are still below par.
Please improve your mapping quality.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135148118
Frans S (2023-04-20 12:54:16+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped.  However, don't connect nodes of buildings to each other

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135148135
Frans S (2023-04-20 12:51:47+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings not mapped accurate.
Building often not squared.
Includes the shadow of the building.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135148139
Frans S (2023-04-20 12:50:13+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135148148
Frans S (2023-04-20 12:45:18+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135148202
Frans S (2023-04-20 12:43:02+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Don't cluster buildings.
Map more accurate.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135148250
Frans S (2023-04-20 12:41:47+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135148257
dcapillae (2023-04-20 12:38:36+00:00): El comentario de este conjunto de cambios es erróneo. Se ha ajustado el mapeado y etiquetado de las fuentes de Torre Atalaya. También se han añadido algunas sendas peatonales, pasos de peatones, zonas verdes y bordillos en el entorno de las fuentes.
Frans S (2023-04-20 12:48:02+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
Your mappings rather  accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Map more accurate and square the buildings.
Do not connect buildings with their nodes 



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135148393
mueschel (2023-04-26 12:37:12+00:00): Hi,
this way has just a 'delete' tag - can this be removed?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/179183083
Frans S (2023-05-06 13:19:57+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Accurate mapping. Follow all rooflines.
Squaring buildings not always done




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135148628
Frans S (2023-04-20 13:15:59+00:00): Hello. Please improve your mapping skills. See my comment on another changeset.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135148748
opendcc (2023-04-21 05:20:21+00:00): Hallo, hat ja schon geklappt - und fast ganz okay ...
Layer -1 und culvert nur da, wo ein Rohr unter dem Weg durchgeht; sonst bleibt das ohne diese Parameter. Diese layer-Angabe dient dazu, dass der Bildberechner weiß, was 'unten' und 'oben' ist. Wasser und Straße wird 'unten' auch dargestellt, halt anders. Servus Wolfgang
(die Angaben habe ich schon gefixt)
mga_geo (2023-05-26 09:57:38+00:00): Bonsoir,
Suite à vos modifications, les relations route=bus 14194678 sont cassées.
Marc
Anton_Klebanovich (2023-06-02 08:48:17+00:00): Bonjour! Merci pour vos commentaires. Fixé dans https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136858699
Hello! Thanks for your feedback. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136858699
Frans S (2023-04-20 13:07:12+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped.  However, follow the rooflines more precisely, you overlooked extensions and corners and mapped just a rectangular building.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135149171
Frans S (2023-04-20 13:05:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Not all buildings accurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.
Nodes of buildings connected to other features.
Buildings clustered.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135149207
Frans S (2023-04-20 13:08:47+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings not accurate mapped.
Clustered buildings. 
Buildings not squared.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135149274
mga_geo (2023-04-24 07:13:17+00:00): Bonjour,
Encore une relation "route=bus" cassée suite à une intervention sur un rond-point.
Marc
Anton_Klebanovich (2023-04-26 17:24:08+00:00): Hello! Thanks you for your feedback! 
Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135396225
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-20 13:10:47+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10827162044

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2023-04-20 14:25:07+00:00): Poprawione.
Frans S (2023-04-26 13:23:56+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please square each rectangular building.
Don't cluster buildings please
Best regards
Frans S (2023-04-20 13:34:45+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. however, don't connect nodes of buildings to other features or buildings.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135150156
user_12500175 (2023-04-20 15:21:48+00:00): Hallo, du mappst die Grundstückszufahrten als 
highway=path.
Das ist so nicht korrekt, Zitat WIKI:
highway=path ist ein allgemeiner Weg für den nicht motorisierten Verkehr. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=path

Da Grundstückszufahrten ja mit Autos befahren werden, wäre dieser Tag besser:
highway=service
surface=paved
service=driveway
access=private
dwbz-nm (2023-04-20 15:39:23+00:00): Hallo, hab es abgeändert. VG
Frans S (2023-04-20 13:56:52+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings not accurate mapped.
Buildings often not squared.
Nodes of buildings connected to other features.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135150480
Frans S (2023-04-20 13:57:27+00:00): This review is also valid for your other mappings today.
Please improve your mapping skills.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135150480
Emmanuel-201901 (2024-02-04 16:47:53+00:00): Bonjour,

Pour le "Camp de Saïx" et conformément au wiki :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:camp_site#%22Legal%22_Campsites

Je m'interroge sur la pertinence du rajout d'un élément tourism=camp_site pour un site illégal et avec enjeux politiques alors que OSM n'est pas prévu à cet effet, il me semble.

Cordialement,
benoitdd (2024-02-11 09:30:13+00:00): On cartographie la réalité, indépendamment de la légalité ;)   (on ferait apparaitre un bâtiment, même s'il n'a jamais été déclaré au cadastre)
En revanche, je l'avais ajouté sur la base d'information dans la presse, il est donc possible que ce camp ait été  provisoire et/ou démonté depuis
benoitdd (2024-02-11 09:31:10+00:00): (Et camp_site me semblait le plus adapté, faute à ma connaissance de tag pour les ZAD)
gpserror (2023-04-20 14:01:31+00:00): Is this supposed to be Priest Boulevard or Preist Boulevard?  TIGER says the former (as well as it's the common spelling of the clergy, though this has no bearing of whether it's spelled right or wrong.)
Vika_Nosovich (2023-04-20 17:05:37+00:00): Hi gpserror!
I checked again and have to fix it. Thank you for noticing.
Best regards!
Frans S (2023-04-20 13:52:50+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings not accurate mapped.
Buildings clustered
Buildings not squared.
Nodes of buildings connected to other features



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135151074
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-20 22:09:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135170722 where the changeset comment is: Reverted revert changesets with no reason and no prior discussion - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7071 and links from there