piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
b-jazz (2025-04-20 15:09:34+00:00): Hello Charles,

There is a limit to the number of nodes a segment can contain. The limit is 2000 nodes. If someone new comes along and wants to refine the way and add a few nodes, it is confusing on how they proceed and split the node up and make sure the relation exists and is ordered correctly.

There are QA tools that flag any segments that are over 1800 nodes. I work to make sure those segments are under that trigger limit so that newer users don't have to worry about bumping up against the 2000 node limit. 

Does that help?
b-jazz (2025-04-20 15:13:35+00:00): Oh, and if you're asking why that particular segment doesn't have any tags, that is because it is part of a larger relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8143217) that carries all the tags for the members of the relation. Is that what you were asking?
charles chilufya (2025-04-20 14:40:10+00:00): Some have no taggings here, please check
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165092154
jhaluska80 (2025-04-18 00:10:13+00:00): Note is wrong, it should be Note 4712548.
Jakuje (2025-04-24 11:30:57+00:00): The building distribution as you mapped is not clearly visible from the Mapbox Satellite imagery (at least the one in the iD editor). Did you really use this imagery? If not, please make sure you put the right one in the metadata.
MaestroKissaki (2025-07-08 20:36:10+00:00): Saludos, uso JOSM y mapas normalmente Mapbox, Bing. JOSM agrega automáticamente la fuente del mapa que uso. (disculpa lo tardío de la respuesta
netjeff (2025-04-20 20:12:55+00:00): I reverted the accidental changes to Bowen St and the Boston Ave sidewalk. More details in my https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/netjeff/diary/406603
AntMadeira (2025-04-18 13:16:55+00:00): Olá, oPortuguêsDestemido!
Bem-vindo ao OpenStreetMap.

Tenho visto que tens feito algumas alterações na área de Serra d'El Rei. 
Relativamente a este conjunto de edições, uma nota:
Os sinais não precisam de direção quando são em estradas de sentido único. Uma vez que a estrada já tem um sentido, é redundante estar a pôr o sentido dos sinais.

Para mais informações, aconselho a leitura:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3%A1ticas

E para saberes mais sobre o OSM, aconselho-te a juntares-te à comunidade portuguesa no Telegram:
https://t.me/OSMPortugal

Qualquer dúvida, estou ao dispor.

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
oPortuguêsDestemido (2025-04-18 14:13:01+00:00): Olá, AntMadeira!

Muito obrigado pela mensagem e pela receção! :D
Isto é uma iniciativa que comecei recentemente, após já ter estado a fazer desenvolvimentos para outras plataformas (ainda que sem comunidade), portanto aqui ainda há uma curva de aprendizagem que alinha com outro conhecimento que tenho, sobre bases de dados. Interpretar o dataset vs. a lógica interpretativa do mapa, mesmo para outras ferramentas como Apps de navegação é o que estou activamente a "partir pedra", mas estou a adorar o desafio.
Entendo aquilo que dizes sobre os sinais, que realmente não me pareceu lógico primeiro, porque muitas estradas na vila estão ambiguamente classificadas como "not One Way" mas explicitam "Lanes:1". Isto levou-me a objectivamente especificar os sinais (assim como as estradas), especialmente quando Serra D'El Rei parece que tem um "buraco" de informação, quando comparado com a península de Peniche, por exemplo. Juntamente com o StreetCompare, estou a tentar identificar o maior número de objectos e trazer actualizações a esta zona, já que estou por aqui, o que me ajuda a focar neste começo.
Só com experiência e feedback é que posso melhorar, por isso, novamente agradeço todo o input! :)

Quanto ao Telegram, não o uso, mas se houver uma comunidade no Signal, estou disponível! 
No Discord ainda não me juntei, mas planeio fazê-lo.

Entretanto vou lendo mais da documentação, mas o guia de boas práticas em PT não o tinha descoberto. 

Igualmente, para qualquer coisa, estou ao dispor.

Cumprimentos,
João Miranda
AntMadeira (2025-04-18 15:18:58+00:00): Ter oneway e lanes=1 não são duas coisas mutuamente exclusivas.
Uma estrada estreita com dois sentidos, pode ter perfeitamente lane=1 por ter efetivamente 1 via (não é possível passarem dois carros ao mesmo tempo).

As regiões são mapeadas no geral e depois cada mapeador obviamente que mapeia mais nas zonas que conhece/habita. As mãos são poucas, daí haver zonas com menos detalhes que outras.
O grosso da comunidade está no Telegram, mas tens o Discord e o fórum oficial do OSM. Embora este tenha pouca atividade no subfórum português, tens muita e boa informação por lá, além da wiki, que é onde se encontra toda a documentação sobre as etiquetas e práticas de mapeamento.

Ao dispor,
António Madeira.
watmildon (2025-04-20 02:12:21+00:00): When this showed up in my "missing mascots" file I thought for sure it was a typo. We a lovely a weird mascot lol.

https://github.com/watmildon/HighSchoolMascotMap/commit/ed64192deed4d36591710872c758f5eb2b484e41
MikeN (2025-04-20 14:07:48+00:00): I'm just glad it didn't come out as the "Blue Hosers"!
Gregory Peony (2025-04-18 04:02:30+00:00): All footpritns valid. Accuracy could be improved and they should be squared (q) after tagging.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165092936
Joseph R P (2025-05-16 02:42:58+00:00): Hello, where did you source these directional prefixes from, particularly 'Southwest Galleria Drive'?
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-05-16 05:01:18+00:00): Well, Galleria Drive intersects Boulder Highway, which is the west–east demarcator for this part of Henderson. Once in a residential neighborhood, Galleria Drive curves from being west–east to north–south. Since Henderson tends not to add directional prefixes to street signs, I could not figure out where Galleria Drive would stop being "West" and start being "South." I hope this info helps.
Allison P (2025-05-16 20:12:32+00:00): Galleria Drive is never South or Southwest. It is West all the way to Russell.
Joseph R P (2025-05-16 21:20:20+00:00): These prefixes should not be assumed and should be added only if they're signed or officially documented in some other way like in the county GIS. Directional prefixes are not arbitrary and are part of the addresses of properties located along the road. Allison is correct that it is West Galleria up to Russell Road—CC OpenWeb shows the road is named as such and shows that buildings like the middle school, rec center, and LDS church are addressed to West Galleria despite the road physically being north-south west of Whitney Ranch Drive.
aharvey (2025-04-18 04:52:42+00:00): the admin admin boundaries all along here seem shifted, it's not a huge deal but I think it's also fine to tweak by a meter to align with the property boundaries.
rant-better (2025-04-19 13:21:22+00:00): Thanks aharvey. If not a huge deal, I'll leave the borders as is, I don't really want to touch the big things like that until I have more experience. Cheers
Frans S (2025-04-18 09:16:00+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
About mapping of high buildings.
Please read this document.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z7uDwYm4oNmlexHIhJxGCjPpNhCQAgRia5aEJr_4MwM/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards
5m4u9 (2025-04-19 00:55:21+00:00): Hola, quizá por error añadiste un aeropuerto a una oficina del gobierno y quitaste el nombre de la oficina... suela pasar, ya lo corregí.

No será que quieres añadir este terreno como parte del aeropuerto? Yo también pensé que podría ser parte como lo es el terreno del lloyd, pero el mapa de la alcaldía muestra como terrenos separados

Todo este manzano desde la calle ayopaya hasta el pasaje viloma la alcaldía lo trata como área especial como terrenos separados del aeropuerto, seguramente era parte antes pero ahora son áreas industriales (empresas) y de deposito (ypfb). 

No puede averiguar si el terreno que está abajo de la oficina DGAC está vigente como hangar o se vendió como área industrial. Quizá estos dos terrenos podrían ser parte del aeropuerto... qué dices?
Cristhyan (2025-04-21 22:51:33+00:00): Tienes razón puesto es una oficina gubernamental aeroportuaria, lo que queria hacer es relacionarlo de alguna manera al aeropuerto. En cuanto al nombre lo borre porque esta en el edificio incorrecto, el edificio de la dgac es el pequeño, el grande es el complejo de de edificios que estan conectados al hangar y es un solo conjunto de edificios pero no encontre la forma de borrar esas separaciones que tienen, de heche hay un pasillo que conecta las dos alas
5m4u9 (2025-04-22 06:54:38+00:00): Cuál sería la razón para relacionarla si ambas son operadas/administradas por distintas instituciones (NAABOL y DGAC)? La única forma posible es averiguando si forma parte del aeropuerto o no, así lo podemos "relacionar" de alguna forma, como lo está el BoA.

Buen aporte, pero no entiendo a qué edificio te refieres... 😂. 

Desde las imágenes satelitales se ven 3 edificios, uno al sur rectangular, 2do en forma U que está conectado al hangar (3ro).

Viendo unas fotos de la inauguración del edificio, el edificio en U lleva el nombre INAC, el otro del sur DGAC.
Taya_S (2025-04-18 04:55:13+00:00): reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165095649
Maplev (2025-04-18 05:47:32+00:00): To whoever is running this bot: could you please, perhaps, revert changes in smaller chunks, instead of creating bounding boxes that cover half the goddamn globe? It makes it harder to track actual changes in my local area.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 06:13:40+00:00): Sorry, but some of what we've been doing does exactly that! :-( e.g. a CS with 1 edit in Egypt & another in Argentina, a different one spanning US > India.
Nater Kane (2025-04-19 03:15:59+00:00): +1 to @Maplev's comment from yesterday. 
These reversions make it impossible to example the history of an area that I'm working on. So when edits I make disappear it's functionally anonymous and horrible for everyone else.
MaciekMma (2025-04-19 05:43:13+00:00): Yep, due to vandalism, some OSM features turn out to be useless.
But it could still be done. A changeset could be virtually divided into smaller bboxes that are logically related to each other. When? Whenever it exceeds a certain size threshold.
MxxCon (2025-04-20 02:13:53+00:00): The new Osmcha is much better at handling global bounding boxes, you folks might consider using that for reviews👍🙂
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165095601
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-20 02:21:08+00:00): Quite possibly, but when the CS we are reverting bounce all over the planet: South America > Europe > East Asia > Central America > Africa, there's no real way of restricting the area, unless we only revert one at a time? & seeing that this batch was ~10000, that would take a long, loooong time! :-(
Nater Kane (2025-05-15 03:32:20+00:00): So creating a different problem by trying to solve the first problem isn't really a solution to the first problem then is it?

These mass reversions are vandalizing the history/changesets for everyone who's made legitimate updates across close to half of the entire planet.
user_5359 (2025-04-19 13:46:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Yout business isn't a street. I revert your try to add your business.
muralito (2025-04-18 19:37:33+00:00): Por favor, solo mapear cosas reales.
Lago Maríntimo (2025-04-19 21:29:24+00:00): Debo mejorar la ubicación. En ese lugar si está el boliche Lago Maríntimo.  Y considero correcto que esté presente. Ya corregí la categoría a la que pertenece. Gracias.
user_5359 (2025-04-19 13:54:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add a wrong tag "Speed Limit=80" on a boundary line. Did you mean "maxspeed=80" on https://www.osm.org/way/174899564? I correct this.
fortera_au (2025-05-11 03:31:32+00:00): I've reverted this changeset due to issues mentioned in previous comments, feel free to redo these changes, but please ensure you're editing the correct object.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166092101
fortera_au (2025-05-09 00:42:06+00:00): Hi, you've marked a track as asphalt, tracks are almost always going to be dirt, did you mean to set this tag on the road itself?
Allison P (2025-04-18 05:25:08+00:00): And Broadway Estate Condominiums, and a bunch of apartment buildings in between...
aharvey (2025-04-19 10:44:09+00:00): this key is experimental still, for this specific why do we need to specify 00:00-24:00 to me it just adds complexity and makes it even harder to enter the values, the surcharges are always going to be based on the whole day and not for only some hours of the day.
TheSwavu (2025-04-19 11:24:50+00:00): The suggestion to add the hours comes from the opening_hours evaluation tool because the opening hours spec requires a time selector. Given that I'm already editing this I felt I might as well deal with the warning.
4004 (2025-04-19 23:39:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238981574 здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
все обьекты, что вы вписали в название, надо обозначать отдельными точками внутри здания
Herman Lee (2025-04-19 17:04:38+00:00): 此修改集已退回
pavvv (2025-04-18 12:02:10+00:00): Dzięki za zauważenie, jeszcze są błędne tagi na segmentach obok.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-20 17:04:31+00:00): na razie pomału przeglądam to element po elemencie na całym świecie

jak chcesz - to poprawa innych elementów jest mile widziana
Herman Lee (2025-04-19 17:04:45+00:00): 此修改集已退回
canfe (2026-04-22 09:16:08+00:00): Il telefono non è nel formato previsto dalla Wiki.
Corretto.
Herman Lee (2025-04-19 17:04:49+00:00): 此修改集已退回
Herman Lee (2025-04-19 17:04:56+00:00): 此修改集已退回
Thorbjoern (2025-04-18 06:55:09+00:00): https://www.geodatenportal.sachsen-anhalt.de/mapapps/resources/apps/viewer_v40/index.html?lang=de&stateId=db79b8e3-28b1-4286-b9b8-e328b1428661
Herman Lee (2025-04-19 17:05:04+00:00): 此修改集已退回
Herman Lee (2025-04-19 17:05:09+00:00): 此修改集已退回
jcr83 (2025-07-19 13:15:42+00:00): Attention : le polygone 1378579631 n'était pas fermé, j'ai corrigé le problème.
literan (2025-04-19 10:44:23+00:00): не надо вандалить, добавлять автобусные станции и кемпинги в вузе
mueschel (2025-04-20 09:56:53+00:00): Hi,
please check this way, it didn't get any proper tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1378582103
hermann106 (2025-04-20 10:34:31+00:00): thanks, i correct it. 
Thanks a lot
fndoder (2025-04-18 11:53:44+00:00): Прошу не использовать публичную карту для ведения личных заметок.

Редактирование карты в Maps.me общедоступно и замусоривает карту другим людям. Для частных заметок есть другие функции в приложении.
bxl-forever (2025-04-18 08:21:03+00:00): Hello,
Adding details like opening hours, email or website is fine.
But please do not copy addresses on shops themselves.  All the adresses in Brussels are already mapped and should not be duplicated.  You can safely ignore the text fields in the simple online editor, they are not useful here.
pedantic-pillow (2025-04-18 09:56:07+00:00): Not very intuitive but OK, then we'll likely need to revert the change on Correspondance as well
bxl-forever (2025-04-18 16:56:05+00:00): I fixed them all this morning.
KKS (2025-04-18 22:02:29+00:00): Вітаю. Булівля яка зараз промаркована як Косенка 112 - по факту не існує, і ніколи не існувала
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-04-18 08:18:42+00:00): *toll_booth etiketleri düzeltildi.
aharvey (2025-04-22 03:07:52+00:00): Looks good, thanks.
b-jazz (2025-04-19 01:44:14+00:00): Hello Lulzy,

RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1378456541

Please make sure you share *all* of the nodes at the boundary between the green and the fairway. If they overlap, they triggered Quality checks and someone has to go and fix them. So please be mindful of that. You might want to familiarize yourself with this wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course

Are you working with a team on these edits? I see a few of you all editing the same area so I'm guessing this is a group thing. Can you let others know of this issue as well? Thanks!
bxl-forever (2025-04-18 19:02:19+00:00): Hello,
Can I please ask a question about this track and the associated tram switches?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1378594259
Did you survey it recently?
It looks like the temporary track that was used to stop trams here during the works in Heembeek.  My information is that it has been removed since then.  But if you tell me that you surveyed it recently, we’ll keep it.
pfhllnts (2025-04-18 19:12:14+00:00): It's still existing, I surveyed it just today.
bxl-forever (2025-04-21 17:58:19+00:00): OK, thanks.
Calibrator (2026-01-31 08:19:05+00:00): Здесь не одностороннее движение: https://n.maps.yandex.ru/#!/panorama?panoramaId=1296402120_775100919_23_1740649846&direction=311.17800823896613%2C0&layer=yandex%23panorama&z=20&ll=37.326341%2C44.883608&l=nk%23sat
Calibrator (2026-01-31 08:26:46+00:00): Здесь не односторолннее движение:
https://n.maps.yandex.ru/#!/panorama?panoramaId=1296402120_775100919_23_1740649846&direction=311.17800823896613%2C0&layer=yandex%23panorama&z=20&ll=37.326341%2C44.883608&l=nk%23sat
Calibrator (2026-01-31 10:22:49+00:00): Я ошибочно откатил вашу правку. Здесь, действительно, одностороннее движение стало с 1 февраля 2025. Видимо, снимки панорам - старые. Извините, вернул вашу версию.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2025-04-30 01:21:51+00:00): Please attach speed cameras to the road.

Or create a maxspeed enforcement relation.

See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dspeed_camera
user_5359 (2025-04-19 13:23:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1378596927. What is the mean of the tag "building=S" = "5"?
Frans S (2025-04-18 13:14:42+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
About mapping of high buildings.
Please read this document.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z7uDwYm4oNmlexHIhJxGCjPpNhCQAgRia5aEJr_4MwM/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards
Vinber-Pro (2025-07-02 10:21:07+00:00): Bonjour,
merci pour ces contributions !

Il y a eu des corrections derrières concernant la casse d'écriture du nom, si tu n'as pas vu et pour que tu sois au courant le nom est plutôt en format  Allée Marie le Pech de Calages que Allée Marie LE PECH DE CALAGE.

Mais la correction est possible car tu avais commencé donc surtout merci !

bonne journée
FajrAl (2025-04-20 06:58:13+00:00): Halo, kalau jalannya ada di permukiman dan hanya bisa dilalui motor/sepeda, bisa pakai Jalan Lingkungan. Kalau Jalur Sepeda itu jalan tersendiri.
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-15 20:31:45+00:00): שלום, בהמשך להערות שלי על שמות תאוריים, יש לזכור שהשם צריך להיות השם האמיתי בלבד. אם אין שם על שלט או שם ידוע, אפשר ועדיף להשאיר ריק. 

האם התצפית הזאת נקראת תצפית בית ג'אן על השלט שלה למשל? או שהיא תצפית בעלת שם אחר או ללא שם, שבמקרה ליד בית ג'אן? אם כן, צריך למחוק או לעדכן את השם.
Marek-M (2025-09-25 10:46:17+00:00): Fikcyjna droga. Brak rozdziału fizycznego.
EHCG (2025-04-18 09:30:12+00:00): Auf dieser Führerstandsmitfahrt sieht man den Fahrweg gut: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6apDf-GPhyw&t=823s
vasony (2025-04-20 07:49:09+00:00): és ettől jobb lett a sütemény?
vmiklos (2025-04-20 09:03:07+00:00): még nem próbáltam! de a réginél nem lesz nehéz jobbnak lenni szerintem :)
MichS (2025-04-21 04:43:50+00:00): Hallo,

private Parkplätze werden bei OSM nicht gelöscht, sonden als privat gezeichet. access=privat.

Hier eine Hilfe, die in diese Richtung Auskunft gibt: osm.wiki/DE:Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

MFG
Langlaeufer (2025-04-23 19:32:01+00:00): Wenn du Fußwege separat einzeichnest, bitte nicht die Überwege für die Fußgänger vergessen, sonst geht das Fußgängerrouting kaputt.
BCNorwich (2025-04-18 10:12:05+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Thanks for the addition to OSM.

However, there's no need to draw a second building that's just duplication. You did place your new tags on the existing building outline, which was correct. I've removed the duplicate building, all OK now.

Regards Bernard.
Frans S (2025-04-25 10:19:32+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project
About mapping of high buildings
Check here how high buildings ought to be mapped.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z7uDwYm4oNmlexHIhJxGCjPpNhCQAgRia5aEJr_4MwM/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping
Langlaeufer (2025-04-22 07:16:29+00:00): hier gibt es doch nur einen Weg? Der Rad- und Fußweg ist als Zufahrt für die Grundstücke freigegeben, oder? getrennte Wege bitte nur einzeichnen, wenn auch baulich! getrennte Wege vorhanden sind. Keine Wege übereinander zeichnen!
Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165103955
ADFC_nh (2025-04-23 18:14:46+00:00): Wie kann ich erkennen, auf welche Strecke sich dein Kommentar bezieht? Ich vermute, es geht um den Weg parallel zur B198 von der Ampel nach Norden. Ober habe ich an anderer Stelle ähnliche Fehler gemacht? Wie erkenne ich in OSM, dass es sich hier um einen benutzungspflichtigen Radweg handelt?
Grüße nh
Langlaeufer (2025-04-23 18:19:06+00:00): sorry, ich habe verbessen den Link dranzupacken: ich meine diese Stelle https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/956494770
Langlaeufer (2025-04-23 19:02:42+00:00): Du erkennst benutzungspflichtige Radwege in OSM nur sicher, wenn sie mit traffic_sign erfasst sind.
Wenn sie seperat erfasst sind, findest du ein bicycle=use_sidepath an der Fahrbahn. Im Kartenbild lässt sich dass leider nicht unbedingt erkennen. Lediglich use_sidepath erkennst du auf https://www.cyclosm.org/ durch die graue Färbung der Fahrbahn.
Langlaeufer (2025-04-23 19:08:43+00:00): sorry, dass mit dem grau stimmt anscheinend nicht mehr, oder die Kacheln sind veraltet.
siehe hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/53.013571/13.997255&layers=YN
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-18 10:11:10+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1378609150

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
grzegorz75jan (2026-04-11 06:59:31+00:00): Edycja zostanie usunięta. Blok znajduje się na innej działce 137/20
https://wierzchoslawice.pl/ostatnie-2-mieszkania-w-sim-wierzchoslawice-dwudniaki-trwa-nabor/

https://polska.e-mapa.net?userview=209236
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-18 10:11:09+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12765728872

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
grzegorz75jan (2025-04-18 21:13:15+00:00): Można coś więcej o edycjach w tym obszarze.
Co jest źródłem, podstawą umiejscowienia budynku oraz skąd pochodzą dane o adresie. 

Dlaczego naniesiono węzeł adresowy na obrys budynku. Tak czy siak byłby to duplikat adresu zawierający jeszcze inny błąd bo tu nie ma nazw ulic o czym napisał już bot.

Na poniższym obrazku https://postimg.cc/cKS2ybRn jakiś urzędowy obrys budynku znajduje się w obrębie numeru urzędowego 907 w innym miejscu. Kto się myli lub może zmieniły się plany.

Gdy rysujesz np. budynek to gdy go zaznaczysz i naciśniesz Q to kąty jego obrysu zostaną poprawione.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165104125
grzegorz75jan (2026-04-11 07:01:29+00:00): Edycja zostanie usunięta. Adres jest przypisany działki 137/20

https://wierzchoslawice.pl/ostatnie-2-mieszkania-w-sim-wierzchoslawice-dwudniaki-trwa-nabor/

https://polska.e-mapa.net?userview=209236

Nie odpowiadasz na komentarze. Adres jest zdublowany oraz błędny.