piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bxl-forever (2024-05-16 15:34:16+00:00): Hello,

I had a look at your changes on the public OpenStreetMap database, because it triggered error warnings.

Is there an official document to find the names of buildings here?  Since Walid Daqqa died last week, we’d like to see a confirmation that this is really a name officially endorsed by university authorities.  Thanks in advance.
bxl-forever_repair (2024-05-19 10:29:18+00:00): Reverted by changeset 151527635
eggie (2024-05-16 19:35:25+00:00): Lijkt me voor nu oke..
Mocht je later zin hebben dan kun je het aanvullen met aanvullende info. Brand  e.d. Zie wiki.
MVG
eggie
simartin82 (2024-05-17 08:56:48+00:00): Gedan in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151442668
map per (2024-05-17 11:17:53+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
NeisBot (2024-05-16 15:45:03+00:00): Hi Coradinl, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1283661489

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-16 17:08:28+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151418683
NeisBot (2024-05-16 15:55:04+00:00): Hi Coradinl, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1283663661

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-21 17:02:23+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151638721
miluethi (2024-05-16 15:57:56+00:00): Hi Gail,

Please square out your buildings on OSM by pressing the “Q” key when a building shape is done.

Please narrow down the size of your building shapes. Some building shapes are significantly larger than the satellite imagery and they include shadows and empty areas around the buildings.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
Frans S (2024-06-08 08:34:47+00:00): Here you did not tag the buildings as well.
Tags building=yes, added by another mapper.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151415627
maraf24 (2024-05-23 12:55:35+00:00): brand to nie firma tylko marka. 
Użycie tego dla krasnali może budzić zastrzeżenia, ale to wymagałoby dyskusji. Ja bym powiedział, że istnienie "Wrocławskich Krasnali" jak marki da się zauważyć (w znaczeniu potocznym).
pavvv (2024-05-16 18:43:01+00:00): To nie jest planowana droga, bo jej dokładny przebieg nie jest jeszcze znany. Dopiero kiedy skończy się ostateczne projektowanie będzie można dodać jako highway=proposed. Na razie zostawiłem drogę jako wziętą z geoportalu.
maro21 (2024-05-17 21:42:39+00:00): Poprawiłem, bo nie ma takiego tagu highway=official.

Skoro droga nie jest nawet zaprojektowana, to nie powinno jej być na mapie. Nie usuwałem, bo przebieg tej nazwanej drogi został uchwalony (chociaż nie ma wyznaczonych pod nią działek). Ale nie mam nic przeciwko usunięciu.
pavvv (2024-05-17 21:58:21+00:00): Urzędowo ulica o takiej nazwie istnieje i jakimś cudem wchodzi w skład jednej z obwodowych komisji wyborczych https://wybory.gov.pl/pe2024/pl/obkw/1271932 , a do tego jest występuje na geoportalu. Myślę, że powinna pozostać zmapowana do czasu zakończenia projektu Alei Północnej lub usunięcia z geoportalu, ale nie jestem pewien jak ją otagować.
midget sub (2024-05-18 21:13:06+00:00): Hello, Westover ARB is *not* open to the public and all these ways you have added need to be marked as such. Further, these are foot paths, since they are not open to bicycle, horse, or moped use. I have asked you multiple times now to kindly use appropriate access tags while mapping from aerial data, and/or to defer to those of us with direct knowledge of on-the-ground access conditions. Thanks again for your attention.
midget sub (2024-05-18 21:14:08+00:00): Hello, Westover ARB is *not* open to the public and all these ways you have added need to be marked as such. Further, these are foot paths, since they are not open to bicycle, horse, or moped use. I have asked you multiple times now to kindly use appropriate access tags while mapping from aerial data, and/or to defer to those of us with direct knowledge of on-the-ground access conditions. Thanks again for your attention.
Janjko (2024-11-17 14:56:58+00:00): Imena crkvi se pišu malim slovom: http://pravopis.hr/pravilo/ostala-imena/100/
Flo Eb (2024-05-16 16:39:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Flo%20Eb/traces/11352797
Oskarst_ (2026-05-06 10:52:42+00:00): Hi,

Is way 320994874 really abandoned? The note on the way from seven years ago says the trail has been rerouted and is signed no access, but there's still considerable use in Strava heatmap. It's also clearly visible in several satellite photos.
wies1 (2024-05-17 13:43:04+00:00): Du sagst, das Unternehmen ist umgezogen. Ich habe den Eindruck, dass du vergessen hast den node mit dem Unternehmen an die neue Adresse zu versetzen. Es wäre nett, wenn Du dies noch nachholen könntest. Der node mit der Firma befindet sich noch in der Wörthstr. 25, München. Danke.
Flo Eb (2024-05-16 16:40:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Flo%20Eb/traces/11352797
Flo Eb (2024-05-16 16:40:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Flo%20Eb/traces/11352797
habi (2024-05-16 16:54:07+00:00): Mersi!
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-24 08:11:19+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151613052
miluethi (2024-08-19 23:11:23+00:00): I'm deleting your building shapes. They are far too big. Please adjust your shapes and match excatly the aerial imagery without combining single buildings into one.
akimapbuilder (2024-05-17 06:00:32+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since there is no building in sight.
Yunan973 (2024-05-18 22:14:02+00:00): Bonjour,

peux tu m'expliquer à quoi cela sert de découper un chemin en 6 chemins identiques (mêmes attributs et mêmes relations) ou de préciser la smoothness des routes/étymologie des noms/hauteur de bordures de trottoir (alors qu'il y a des quartiers où les passages piétons ne sont même pas indiqués) ?

Il suffit d'aller dans n'importe quel quartier, de marcher quelques pas et de constater que quasi aucune boutique n'est à jour (j'ai corrigé des restos/coiffeurs/bijouteries qui avaient fermés depuis bien avant le covid), il y a un travail considérable à faire pour tous ceux qui viennent sur Cayenne et qui souhaite avoir une cartographie avec les éléments de base à jour. Cela me semble bien plus prioritaire, ne crois tu pas ?

Cordialement
adrienandrem (2024-05-31 19:12:04+00:00): Bonjour,

OpenStreetMap est un projet collaboratif dans lequel chaque contributeur est libre d'enrichir la base comme il le peut et le souhaite, dans le respect des règles et usages définis par la communauté.

Traiter la voirie par tronçon est classique, géré par les outils, permet d'ajouter des informations à une échelle plus fine (sur le coup, ou par une édition ultérieure), et ne pose problème pour aucun des contributeurs expérimentés avec lesquels j'ai l'habitude d'échanger.

Je ne vois pas de rapport entre la complétude des passages piétons et le renseignement de l'état de la voirie, qui d'ailleurs est un sujet bien connu de quiconque réside sur le territoire.
Vous semblez ignorer la multitude et la diversité des utilisations de la donnée OSM. Cela ne rend pas certaines informations moins importantes que celles auxquelles vous vous intéressez. Et je n'adhère pas à vos considérations de priorités, des plus subjectives.

« dans n'importe quel quartier … quasi aucune boutique n'est à jour » : Vos exagérations décrédibilisent vos propos, et, ajoutées au reste, ne donnent pas envie de prendre le temps de vous répondre.

Enfin, sur OSM comme dans les projets collaboratifs en général, il est d'usage de renseigner son profil.

Bonne soirée.
Frans S (2024-06-08 08:34:03+00:00): Here you did not tag the buildings as well.
Tags building=yes, added by another mapper.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151418772
pavvv (2024-05-16 18:04:14+00:00): Jeśli chodzi o samo techniczne zmapowanie, to obszary powinny mieć role outer zamiast inner i być bez tagów (żeby nie powielały tagu landuse=railway)
ticki_52 (2024-12-20 10:03:36+00:00): Hallo Gernick, das Versetzen von Elementen, die zu Buslinien gehören, ist fehlerfrei nur mit dem JOSM-Ediztor möglich. Das Protokoll zu Deinem CS zeigt, dass 8 (in Worten: ACHT) Buslinien zu überarbeiten sind, um die Linien wieder fehlerfrei zu bekommen. Danke. Grüße ticki_52
user_17767192 (2024-05-17 16:27:34+00:00): War klar das der Herr Powermapper einfach kommentarlos drauflosmapt und den Hinweis bei "Ungelöster Hinweis Nr. 4123823"  missachtet. Highway=construction ist hier nicht Wiki-konform, dazu wurden vorhandene Objekte einfach gelöscht und somit die Historie zerstört. Dann noch fix ein paar Nutzlostags drangepappt und fertig ist der Edit. Der Bearbeitungszähler steigt wieder ums eins und auf zum nächsten Edit...
ma-rt-in (2024-05-17 16:33:34+00:00): Moin,

Freundlich kann man trotzdem bleiben!
Bitte erleuchte mich, weshalb genau construction eben nicht geeignet sein soll.
Ich habe hier nichts einfach gelöscht! Bitte benennen es konkret! Auch was soll den nutzlos sein?

Gruß
DD1GJ (2024-05-16 19:05:55+00:00): Wieso hattest du den "Park" so vergrößert, dass auch noch Wohnhäuser drin sind?
-> revert

https://pokemon-go-forum.de/threads/pokemon-go-spieler-zerstoeren-open-streetmaps.3160/
DD1GJ (2024-05-16 18:39:32+00:00): Die ganze Innenstadt als Park? Spielst Du Pokémon?
-> Revert
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-11 23:11:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152564229 where the changeset comment is: revert dubious edits around Szczecin, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16136
Glassman (2024-05-17 15:59:30+00:00): A couple of suggestions. First use the actual name not a descriptive name. The type of business should be tagged such as shop=massage.

Second, the building is should be tagged as one type, ie commercial or retail. This looks like a building=retail. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings for more info on tagging buildings. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151421343
miluethi (2024-05-16 20:25:30+00:00): Hi tegamike,

Please square out all buildings. It's easy - just press the "Q" key with a selected building shape. 

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
muralito (2024-08-06 20:49:12+00:00): Hi. Which Esri Wolrd Imagery did you use? I'm seeing one of them (Beta) and it does not shows roads this roads.
YeiMapea (2024-08-07 15:21:24+00:00): Hi muralito,
I used Esri World Imagery which shows these roads are visible, and not Esri Word Imagery (Clarity) Beta. Hopefully this helps clarify!
muralito (2024-08-07 19:28:56+00:00): Thank you. My JOSM configuration translates the labels and that is confusing.
NeisBot (2024-05-16 18:35:03+00:00): Hi noidontthink, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1283708266

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-18 10:01:33+00:00): Hi noidontthink,

some of the stuff you added here doesn't exist, so I went ahead and removed those features.

Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-21 16:58:20+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151485791
MxxCon (2024-05-20 04:38:22+00:00): lastcheck= is a deprecated tag. It should not be used. The correct tag to use is check_date=.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151422333
IraGersh (2024-05-20 17:26:47+00:00): Will change tonight.
IraGersh (2024-05-20 22:03:38+00:00): Thanks for fixing it.
A35K (2024-05-16 19:31:25+00:00): motor_vehicle=DE:260,1026-38 ??
Geo-Tobi (2024-05-16 19:40:16+00:00): Hilf mir bitte, welche Straße meinst du? Der Abschnitt ist zu groß.
Geo-Tobi (2024-05-16 19:46:38+00:00): Ah, hab's. War natürlich Käse. Keine Frage. Danke dir.
11daf (2024-06-01 05:48:12+00:00): Добрый день!

Спасибо, что вносите свой вклад в OSM!

Дороги, используемые для подъезда транспорта к какому либо объекту отмечаются как service. Подробнее https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dservice

Как track отмечаются полевые/лесные дороги, используемые для движения спецтехники. Подробнее https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dtrack

Поменял
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-17 09:49:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 151445074, 151445065 where the changeset comment is: problematischer Wanderweg-Import vorläufig entfernt s. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/massenimport-wanderwegdaten/113311/1
Frans S (2024-06-08 08:33:36+00:00): Here you did not tag the buildings as well.
Tags building=yes, added.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151423190
HellMap (2024-05-17 15:15:59+00:00): Hi!

The edit by itself looks okay.

I should note that the cycle lanes themselves should be added either as separate ways or tags on the road, depending on what they are (like, are there any physical separators?).

I cannot say more without surveying the location, which I will likely do soon and fix/adjust everything as needed.

One question I have - can you (not) turn left here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26705673 coming from West from Ezemalas turnign North to Viskaļu (towards the apartment area NE)? If you can, then the road should not join at such a sharp angle.

Similarly, can you (not) turn here left  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26705676 ?

Cheers
HellMap (2024-05-22 12:20:35+00:00): I've adjusted the details and added the new left turn from Ezermalas to Viskaļu.
usantik (2024-05-22 23:15:11+00:00): Hi!

Sorry for not replying on time, but yep, there is only one turn that could be added and that's the one you've actually added :). So far, bike lanes are not separated by anything but the markings on the road. Don't know if they will add any poles or something similar to what's used in the city center, but that's how things are at the moment.
chris66 (2025-04-03 15:37:15+00:00): Sind die Höfe fertig?

Erste Läden sind schon drin...
qmi0 (2024-06-21 20:19:15+00:00): Szia , a 24/d a lentebbi épület, az biztosan az? Mert szerintem az a föntebbi és a lentebbi épület házszáma helyesen 24/a.
vasony (2024-06-21 21:34:40+00:00): Szia! Az utca másik felén mértem fel, csak a perjelet raktam bele, hogy egységes legyen. Ezeket a házszámokat nem én vittem fel eredetileg. 
Ami van fotóm, hogy a szemből a jobb oldalin van egy 24d felirat:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=47.5269444&lng=19.0288889&z=19.9&pKey=771467697966901&focus=photo

Szerintem javítsd át nyugodtan a bal alsót /a-ra
MxxCon (2024-05-20 04:42:19+00:00): Why level 4?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151423652
IraGersh (2024-05-20 17:31:47+00:00): I looked at it closely from the river on Saturday.  The waste treatment plant 1st floor is above the river.  It may be on the same level as the ground floor entrance to the elevator.  The elevator does not provide entrance to two levels of Waste treatment plant and there are definitely two levels.  The roof is at level 4 if the river is at 1, waste treatment plant at 2, 3.  I've trying to find schematics for the Wastwater treatment plant which by the way is no longer called a waste treatment plant but a wastewater resource recovery facility (WRRF).  Used to be called a water pollution control plant (WPCP).
Violaine_Do (2024-11-27 05:39:11+00:00): Hi, I am not sure if I already said it in a different comment to you, so please excuse if you already are aware of that : you should not move buildings prior to move imagery cause they are supposed to be good accuracy. So could you check this changeset and do the adjustment please in regard to taht? (else we lose topo accuracy). Thks in advance
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151423769
Metzor (2024-05-19 07:10:55+00:00): Changeset created zigzag  in street and deletion of path doubtful. No reasonable changeset consent.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151521304
ExoMal (2024-05-16 19:56:21+00:00): Hi MapSpot,

Why did you remove the parking_space tag? it's unusual, but from survey, this parking space really is designated as disabled only and a charging space.
ExoMal (2024-05-16 19:57:16+00:00): Apologies! I jumped the gun and did not notice that you only in fact swapped the order of tags and removed the white space.
MapSpot (2024-05-17 16:22:03+00:00): No problem. I should've worded this changeset comment a little better. Basically been combing through a bunch of unusual parking_space tags with only one use worldwide. Most of them were better of as a description=* tag, but a few were typos and syntax issues that got fixed, not "removed".
archpdx (2024-12-08 19:29:58+00:00): This building should be on layer=1 considering the track, pool, and other sports fields above it are on layer=2. Maybe you're confusing layer with building:levels?
IraGersh (2024-12-09 00:02:36+00:00): Yes I probably am confusing the two. So the Wastewater Treatment Plant can have 3 building layers and one actual layer and the park would occupy layer 2 and it will have 2 building layers?  The Cultural Center has the 2 building layers.
ValaUlmo (2024-05-16 19:27:43+00:00): At first I added it as anonymous, then I logged in and "resolved" that.  It should last 7 days.  Then I tried to re-add it as logged in, but the stupid interface put the pin in the wrong location, and I can't delete that.  Then I re-added it in the right location.  Then I noticed the edit button, so hit edit, and zoomed in as close to the center of that coordinate as I could.  What an annoying process!  Hopefully this time I got it right.
ValaUlmo (2024-05-16 19:30:36+00:00): I don't see it showing up in OSM from another browser.  When does it show up?
ValaUlmo (2024-05-16 19:35:56+00:00): If you want to know the correct coordinates, use the linked source document.  It specifically says:  

Latitude (NAD 83): 	25° 59' 49.42" N
Longitude (NAD 83): 	97° 09' 29.02" W

I.e.:  25.99706111111N 97.15806111111°W
ValaUlmo (2024-05-16 19:36:19+00:00): I.e., 25.99706111111°N 97.15806111111°W
ValaUlmo (2024-05-16 19:40:21+00:00): Aha!  I finally discovered the obscure way OSM does coordinates:  This is the OSM coordinate nomenclature for OLIT B:  25.99706111111 -97.15806111111
ValaUlmo (2024-05-16 19:43:39+00:00): This still hasn't shown up on another browser, despite it being 19 minutes ago.  The interface claimed this would take 1 minute.
Taya_S (2024-05-17 12:41:42+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Browser_cache
mcliquid (2024-05-17 07:27:17+00:00): Hi, würde sich statt dem Hinzufügen von "source=survey 05.2024 and Vogis 2022" nicht besser ein "check_date=2024-05-16" eignen?
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/268193502)

Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:check_date

Soweit ich das Wiki korrekt verstehe, wird "source" bei korrekter Verwendung bereits vom Editor gesetzt, wenn bspw. in JOSM die "Datenquelle" eingetragen wird. Das ist das zweite Feld beim hochladen deiner Änderungen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:source

Oder wo siehst du den Vorteil, das gleiche "source" bei jedem einzelnen Objekt einzufügen?
jeka p (2024-05-23 19:01:02+00:00): Hi!
check_date passt sicher gleicht gut, wie meine Variante. War alte Gewohnheit :)
SG
silversurfer83 (2024-05-17 06:21:37+00:00): Hi Hubertus,

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht. Ich mach das mal.

Verglichen mit dem Luftbild könnte das schon passen was du da gemacht hast. Kein Widerspruch meinerseits :)

Eine Kleinigkeit zum "Drumherum": Um deine Änderung besser beurteilen zu können ist ein etwas ausführlicherer Kommentar sowie eine Quellenangabe sehr hilfreich. Wenn ich zB weiß, dass du vor Ort warst (Quelle: survey), sieht das anders aus als wenn du "nur" nach Luftbild arbeitest.

Weiter viel Spaß in Feld und Wald
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151424359
hubertusw (2024-05-17 07:53:18+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis! Ich war natürlich persönlich vor Ort, als ich den Rothaarsteig gewandert bin. Viele Grüße
pyrog (2024-05-17 17:17:53+00:00): Salut Binette,

Tu as "cassé" l'itinéraire du réseau de carrefours du Vercors en fusionnant la voie d'accès que tu as rajouté au lotissement avec une voie membre de la relation.

J'ai corrigé.

Yves

https://knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/route/17453961
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151424422
Binnette (2024-05-27 06:25:55+00:00): Hello Pyrog. Ok My bad, merci de la correction :)
Marek-M (2024-05-31 20:00:19+00:00): Drogi zostały nieprawidłowo rozdzielone. Wysepki nie są tutaj aż tak duże. Nieprawidłowe rozdzielenie CPR na chodnik i drogę dla rowerów.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152097002
save2desk (2024-05-21 13:53:39+00:00): А почему ты отметил тротуары без вялодорожек как highway=path?
Александр Синявский (2024-05-22 18:51:10+00:00): Судя по описанию https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dpath это допустимый вариант в случае уточнения тегом footway=sidewalk. Есть более актуальный тег?
miluethi (2024-05-16 21:22:16+00:00): Hi Jennifer,

Please square out your OSM buildings. Just press the “Q” with a selected building shape.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua
gileri (2024-05-18 09:58:24+00:00): Hi, both are fine in my opinion.

Keeping history of objects is usually a good idea, both for conservation and helping contributors understand changes.

The question is whether it's better to keep the history of "the building", or "the company". Here I would say the company is preferable to the building.
user_2322809 (2024-05-18 19:44:15+00:00): source?
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-29 19:38:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152004532 where the changeset comment is: revert un-sourced mapping and/or mapping based in IDF sources in conflict zone.
Paul Berry (2025-02-11 11:19:14+00:00): We're not allowed to include What3Words data on OpenStreetMap so I have removed it.
Read more: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What3words
blagodarenko (2024-07-15 20:28:40+00:00): Приветствую! обследовал данную развязку: под мостом знак ограничения высоты 3.7 в сторону Нижнебаканской (id 191880547), и 3.9 в сторону Новоукраинского (id 31121415). Сверху, на Крымск (id 31121409) - ограничений нет. Внес правки.
JezCrow (2024-05-18 01:01:00+00:00): Hi Bird Soup, this pharmacy is still open - just not a Lloyds branded one. I would imagine that many of the 174 (so far) pharmacies you have changed to disused:pharmacy are still open too under another name/brand. I suggest this should be discussed on the Talk-GB mailing list. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct