piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Firefishy (2023-10-04 13:10:39+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap :-) Any help mapping more of Oudtshoorn greatly appreciated.
eggie (2023-10-04 10:36:15+00:00): Dag Millsite  Het voetpad heb ik doorverbonden met de Hortensialaan. Het zou anbders niet routeren.
MVG
eggie
Millsite (2023-10-04 11:12:05+00:00): dankje eggie, weer iets geleerd
eggie (2023-10-04 10:38:47+00:00): Dag Millsite.. 
De parkeervakken zijn oke, maar.... 
Het adres heb ik van de parkeervakken verwijderd. Dat hoort geen adres te hebben in OSM
MVG
eggie
J-MUC (2023-10-04 14:51:06+00:00): Sorry for the large bounding box, that was unintentional.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-04 10:20:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9418579987
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965357617

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2023-10-04 11:17:46+00:00): Oke Job,

Je bedoeling is natuurlijk goed.
Een castle zal het vast niet zijn.
Wel bv historic=city_wall, maar eigenlijk een onderdeel ervan. 


Zal dit de juiste vorm zijn.
Helaas zijn de septemberfoto's bewolkt. 
Wellicht zit hier nog iets bij? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:defensive_works
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-10-04 11:27:02+00:00): Grappig.. Op de AHN4 hoogtekaart is het wel te zien. 
http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~allroads/NLOSMOK/OSMOKNL/OSMOKNL.html#map=20.06/51.2799/3.7547/0
Wellicht even die BGT lagen uitzetten
jop_1965 (2023-10-04 11:57:27+00:00): Als je de foto's in dit (https://www.omroepzeeland.nl/nieuws/15920719/erwin-vindt-een-kolossale-vestingmuur-in-zijn-achtertuin-ik-was-met-stomheid-geslagen) artikel vergelijkt met BING-streetview, dan is dit de locatie. De Oostbeer aan de Philippineweg heeft ook Kasteel als symbool, voor de continuïteit leek me dat beter.
eggie (2023-10-04 12:59:26+00:00): Dat is zo.... . up to you. 😀
Mapse..
eggie
Kovoschiz (2023-10-04 10:52:02+00:00): Please don't change a `=mini_roundabout` point to ` =roundabout` line.
eggie (2023-10-04 11:10:29+00:00): Dag Máttias

Een highway=path zal gewoon routeren voor fietsers.. Mocht je niet met tweewielers daar komen dan kun je toevoegen vehicle=no

MVG
eggie
Branko Kokanovic (2023-11-05 21:15:19+00:00): Zdravo, super sto dodajete ove zgrade, ali ako ponovo budes unosila po Srbiji adrese, pazi da adresa ode na way zgrade, a ne da ostane unutar zgrade. Detalji su ovde: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Serbia/Adresses , a prosto je ako dodas "building tools" plugin (verovatno ga vec imas ako crtas zgrade) i konfigurises ga da merge-uje address pointe kada se zgrada crta. Valjevo je medju najgorim gradovima u Srbiji po ovoj gresci: https://dina.openstreetmap.rs/ar/addresses_in_buildings.html i lako se to popravi, ali da znas za ubuduce ako se opet budu crtale zgrade, molim te! Reci i drugarima:)
OliveraM (2023-11-15 12:47:44+00:00): Hvala, imacu u vidu za sledeci put!
225059 (2023-10-04 10:49:58+00:00): Mein Kommentar „ Leerungszeit gemäß Schild am Briefkasten geändert“ ist falsch, korrekt sollte dort stehen: „örtlich vorgefundene Bank eingefügt“. Ich bitte das zu Entschuldigen.
freeExec (2023-10-04 11:03:23+00:00): Если дорог нет в реальности, то не надо изображать, что идёт их строительство.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-09 17:22:34+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11238024061/history has maxspeed:source = sign that was added in this edit
is it intentionally used instead of source:maxspeed=sign ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Asource%3Amaxspeed%3Dsign

maxspeed:type is also sometimes used as a key for such data, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:type
Hugoren Martinako (2023-10-04 10:50:23+00:00): Añadida elevación
yelisey90 (2025-11-27 06:55:29+00:00): partly rv - this is precisely the case for area:highway=footway

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175183798
supsup (2026-03-17 15:26:38+00:00): Hello, there is access tags and also camp_site=basic to indicate that there is nothing there. I changed it accordingly here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180013586

But I would also be quite happy for the node to go away altogether.

In any case, it is not in backcountry, it is too close to a road.
Growebis (2023-10-04 15:30:46+00:00): Using Esri imagery, This building doesn't actually exist, since the Bing imagery is a bit outdated since Saudi Arabia has destroyed certain parts of Jeddah. Please remove it and thank you.
Aleksandar1994 (2023-10-05 06:33:59+00:00): Thank you so much for sharing this valuable information. I will keep this in mind next time I make changes in Jeddah.
Best regards
Aleksandar
jmsbert (2023-12-03 00:37:47+00:00): Hello RockhopperMapper, you asked to get a review on your edits in this changeset.
What I liked was that you sucessfully squared buildings mapped by other mappers - always good to do so. What I do not recommend is to map landuses in this kind of projects. The main reason is that you are requested to stay with your mapping within the area of the task. In case of landuses that go beyond the task area the result of mapping these is that an odd shaped area results - and as it is usually not the task to map these features the neighbor contributor does not continue mapping the area. Therefore I cannot recommend mapping these features within these projects.
Anyways keep on mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142139783
eserte (2023-12-04 19:22:11+00:00): Hier sind bei der StreetComplete-Bearbeitung Radspuren verschwunden. Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3977514
Mopshase12 (2023-12-04 19:33:10+00:00): Stralauer Straße ändert sich ständig durch die Bauzustände am Molkenmarkt.
eserte (2023-12-04 19:53:13+00:00): Ich fahre da öfters mal lang und es waren eigentlich immer Radspuren da. Nur für kurze Zeit wurde die RVA Richtung Westen teilweise auf den Gehweg verlegt.
Mopshase12 (2023-12-04 20:56:17+00:00): Was für eine RVA ist da momentan (in beiden Fahrtrichtungen)? Wieder die Radfahrstreifen?
eserte (2023-12-04 21:05:11+00:00): Der mir bekannte Stand ist immer bei BBBike eingetragen: http://bbbike.de/cgi-bin/bbbikeleaflet.cgi?lat=52.516208&lon=13.413464&zoom=17&l=RW&bm=B

Grüne Linien entlang der Straße = Radfahrspuren (ja, ich weiß, die Legende fehlt noch...)
eggie (2023-10-04 11:43:20+00:00): Het is oke zo, want er ligt een groenstook tussen de hoofdrijbaan en het voetpad.

Langsliggende trottoirs.. dus waar je zo van de stoep de weg opstapt..  worden meestal niet apart ingetekend, maar als tagging opgenomen in de hoofdrijbaan met sidewalk=right, left of both..  
Sommige mappers tekenen ze wel in met highway-footway met footway=sidewalk, maar dat geeft vaak problemen met de routering. Je krijgt omwegen.. Het mag overigens wel. Er is geen consensus over. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-10-04 11:43:35+00:00): typo groenstrook..
eggie (2023-10-04 11:46:14+00:00): Bij opnemen in de hoofdrijbaan.. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk

en anders met een groenstrook ertussen zoals jij het correct hebt gedaan.
Strubbl (2023-10-04 17:28:23+00:00): Hi, what is this node? The address is already mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3916420885
dieghernan (2023-10-06 07:42:28+00:00): Hola Sandra0708

He modificado el nombre de las calles de algunas parcelas que no estaba alineado con el nombre de la calle: aparecía como addr:street="Paseo fuente del cura" y ahora es addr:street=Paseo de la Fuente del Cura, alineado con el nombrado de la calle en OSM.

Saludos
Johnwhelan (2024-07-27 15:40:40+00:00): You appear to have removed the tags from some buildings when adding solar panels.  I've added them back in as building=yes
redd (2026-01-14 09:21:11+00:00): Hallo Helge_Inselmann,
leider ist deine wheelchair:description abgeschnitten. Kannst du diese sinnvoll kürzen, falls noch wichtige Informationen fehlen?

Danke und Grüße,

redd
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-10-04 13:25:05+00:00): 您好，看起來您刪掉了非常多的點，請問它們是都不存在了嗎？
Supaplex (2023-10-05 03:30:16+00:00): 您好：

誠如快乐的老鼠宝宝所說，如果店家還在去移除是不妥。如果需要客製化地圖，可以採用其他OpenStreetmap資料的底圖，在GIS軟體如QGIS操作
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142142543
Supaplex (2023-10-05 03:32:07+00:00): 已經回退編輯
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142157871
記住，OpenStreetMap累積志工增添的道路、公車路線、商家設施，如沒有變動是不該輕易移除，這都是經年累月的成果，需要好好維護
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142142543
Yi Hsin (2023-10-05 11:14:09+00:00): 明白，因還不熟悉流程而誤刪除了。十分感謝各位說明！
DaveF (2023-12-03 11:29:35+00:00): Hi
Please refrain from adding duplicate railway=station tags. There should only be one per station.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11238169295
map per (2023-10-31 12:26:32+00:00): Hallo AspenTelluride,

die Orte die du in Maps.me eingetragen hast wurden direkt in die öffentliche OpenStreetMap Datenbank hochgeladen.

Die Bäckerei war aber schon eingetragen (vgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1903047645), hab den doppelten Eintrag wieder gelöscht.

Viele Grüße
map per
ftcat (2023-10-05 06:17:55+00:00): Hi Icem4k,

I notice you have been updating some of the new road developments in Lusaka and creating dual carriageways. While many of these roads have been widened and extra lanes added they are not technically dual carriageways as they are not separated by an island, ie not 2 separate carriageways. Examples of dual carriageways are obviously Cairo Road and Addis Abba Drive among others. Many of the new widened roads just have a painted line separating the lanes in opposite directions so a single carriageway. The way to tag these roads is to indicate the number of lanes ie 4 or 6, this is 2 lanes in each direction for the former and 3 for the latter. I have reverted some of your changes for this reason. I am not sure as to the status of Alick Nkhata so have not reverted it as I have not traveled on this road recently and it is not clear form the satellite imagery but I suspect it is not a dual carriageway.

For more detailed explanation see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway.
YomanNH (2023-10-05 08:21:41+00:00): Cześć!
Chodnik, czy ciąg pieszo-rowerowy? Bo jeśli tylko chodnik, to tagi bicycle=designated, foot=designated i segregated=no są do usunięcia. A jeśli ciąg pieszo-rowerowy, to powinno to być highway=path.
Dotyczy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081731624
Langlaeufer (2023-10-04 16:50:11+00:00): Hallo Lelz,

ist die Brücke als Rad-/Fußweg beschildert?

Grüße
Langläufer
Kogacarlo (2023-10-05 00:21:02+00:00): Ik kwam dit nieuws ook tegen en dacht ik zal 's even op de kaart kijken. Wat leuk dat je deze muur al hebt toegevoegd! Groeten Carlo
Kogacarlo (2023-10-05 00:52:51+00:00): Aan de andere kant van het dorp staat er ook een: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768129609 Ik vind historic=castle wel een vreemde tag voor een muur.
jop_1965 (2023-10-05 04:43:42+00:00): Hoi, de oostbeer is door iemand anders toegevoegd.
Kogacarlo (2023-10-05 15:40:02+00:00): Van de oostbeer heb ik een dam gemaakt.
Herman Lee (2023-10-12 12:06:36+00:00): 您好，车站的名称不含站字，如“上海”、“杭州东”，在此退回您的编辑内容。
shokrian (2023-10-07 07:28:32+00:00): hello
The name of this place has been "Persian Gulf" for thousands of years.
Based on which reference and reliable source have you changed its name to "Arabian Gulf"?
woodpeck (2023-10-09 10:40:14+00:00): There are multiple countries bordering this water body and only one of them is using the (Arabic) name "Persian Gulf". There were lengthy discussions on the OSM talk mailing list about this, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2021-November/087097.html - the current compromise is that while we use the English name "Persian Gulf", the Arabic name is the equivalent of "Arabic Gulf", and name:fa (the Farsi name) is again the equivalent of "Persian Gulf". Feel free to raise this discussion on the community forum again, but unilateral changes are not acceptable.
shokrian (2023-10-14 07:33:53+00:00): The Persian Gulf is a geographical and historical fact and has been recorded in the world memory with the same name for more than 2000 years.
Referring to the text of all historical international treaties between the countries bordering this water body in the past few centuries, the name of this place has been recorded as equivalent to "Persian Gulf" in different languages.
In the images of geographical maps from hundreds of years ago, many of which were prepared and available by Arabs, Persians, Greeks, Chinese and even Europeans, the name of this water body "Persian Gulf" is recorded. 
Also, the name of the "Persian Gulf" is registered in international organizations such as the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), etc. Therefore, any action to forge and change the name of the Persian Gulf is against international regulations and also unethical. 
Please remind those with whom you have compromised to use the Arabic equivalent name "Arabian Gulf" of this important point.

With respect
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-10-31 09:31:39+00:00): مرحبا بك، هذه الخريطة عامة ونرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن عشوائية إليها وشكرا لك
L'imaginaire (2024-06-07 06:59:56+00:00): Hey Dieter,
Je had hier een van de twee picknickbanken aan Het Nest verwijderd. Ik heb die ondertussen opnieuw toegevoegd.
Oskarst_ (2023-12-15 09:11:25+00:00): Hei! Ser du har lagt inn en del stier som jeg ikke finner andre steder enn i Kartverkets kart. De er ikke synlige i satellittbilder, og har heller ingen spor i Stravas Heatmap. Stemmer det at de finnes?
thasle (2023-12-29 07:11:13+00:00): La de inn fordi jeg skulle gå en runde der, men måtte gi opp fordi det var bløtt.  Bør nok fjernes, jeg sjekker på nytt til våren, har hytte i nærheten. 
Har tidligere gått Dagalivegen fra Torsetlita til Sjupgførrelve for mange år siden, før jeg startet med kartlegging, og fant den stien igjen nå.  Men den er lite brukt, og gror igjen. Men den var der, selv om lyng og vier gjør at den er vanskelig å finne. Dessuten er det myrete, og stien deler seg i mange forgreninger, hvilket gjør den vanskelig å følge. Gikk bare starten, måtte snu pga. mye vann og myrete.
Oskarst_ (2024-01-03 06:29:16+00:00): Takk for oppklaring! Jeg opplever ofte at stiene i Kartverkets kart ikke finnes eller er ganske unøyaktige, så det er ikke alltid så lett.
Oskarst_ (2025-06-03 07:45:43+00:00): Hei igjen, har du fått undersøkt stiene?
thasle (2025-06-03 08:55:19+00:00): Nei, men jeg gikk en tur ved Trolltjønnstulen (litt lenger øst), og prøvde å finne en sti som sto på det offisielle kartet, den var borte.  Formodentlig et dyretråkk, som forsvinner når det bygges.

Skal ta en tur i sommer og se om jeg finner noe.
geoaria (2024-01-02 17:35:52+00:00): چرا یک مسیر یک طرفه را no acsess کرده اید. اگر مسیر بسته شده باید مسیرها هم از یک طرفه خارج شده و مسیر های منتهی از حالت جزیره در آید. حتما در این طور مواقع یاداشت روی ادیت خود بگارید تا نقشه های دیگر آن را اصلاح کنند.
twz123 (2023-10-04 16:18:34+00:00): Det ist zwar geschlossen, aber durchaus noch als Restaurant auf der Straße zu erkennen, inkusive Namensschild usw.

Es war vorher als disused:amenity als geschlossen gekennzeichnet. Hast du irgendwelche Einwände, wenn es wieder als geschlossenes Restaurant eingetragen wird, bis da mal was anderes drin ist?
Dusche123 (2023-10-05 08:17:47+00:00): Entschuldigung, das habe ich übersehen. Nein, ich habe da keine Einwende, dass es als disused:amenity beibehalten wird.
twz123 (2023-10-05 21:17:34+00:00): Alles klar, danke!
jayaddison (2026-03-12 23:17:24+00:00): The updated start_date tag on this confused me for a few moments - thank you, though - it seems accurate.
Akkurator (2024-02-04 13:09:06+00:00): Hallo Larmicon,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362825710/history/7
du hast dieses Haus als Doppelhaushälfte getaggt, aber die andere Hälfte fehlt.
War das ein Versehen, oder umfasst der Grundriss beide Hälften?
Der OSM-Grundriss scheint auch kleiner als als der auf dem Luftbild, z.B. Esri World Imagery.

Grüße,
Akkurator
Akkurator (2024-02-04 13:10:39+00:00): Ergänzung, wiki-Seite zu semidetached
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dsemidetached_house
Akkurator (2024-02-04 13:14:17+00:00): noch ne Ergänzung: wenn es ein Doppelhaus ist: hat es auch 2 Adressen? Sollten dann beide ran.
Larmicon (2024-02-06 18:04:38+00:00): Hallo Akkurator,
vielen Dank für dein Scharfes Auge, da habe ich mich beim Eintragen wohl vertippt!

Habe es zu einem normalen Haus korrigiert; Siehe Hierzu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147145676
zstadler (2023-12-01 14:23:39+00:00): שלום דניאל,

תודה על תרומתך למפה ועל התמונה שהוספת

מסיבות שאינן קשורות אליך, נוצרה במקום כפילות. 
אנחנו מעוניינים להביך איך זה קרה על מנת למנוע מצב שהאפליקציה מאפשרת יצירה של כפילויות כאלו.

אולי אתה זוכראת סדר הפעולות  שעשית על מנת להעלות את התמונה?

תודה,
זאב מצוות
Israel Hiking Map
jmilot (2023-10-10 14:46:42+00:00): Hey,

Just wondering why this section of Rue De Boucherville were changed from `
cycleway:both:lane` to `
cycleway:both:track`? There's only paint on the road, no physical barrier.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-10-10 14:49:34+00:00): There is a curb now. The cycling path is not on the road but separated now
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-10-10 18:18:56+00:00): Voici la photo de juillet 2023 (Streetview):
https://ibb.co/w7bwCd1
jmilot (2023-10-10 21:19:05+00:00): > Voici la photo de juillet 2023 (Streetview)

Yes, between Blvd St-Joseph and Rue Dauphin, there's a curb like it was mapped in OSM before after my edit. 

> There is a curb now.
This is false, as there is no curb between Saint-Amant and Blvd des Pins. Between Dauphin and Saint-Amant is kind of a mix. 

I've visually validated this information while being physically on that road. So, please, trust me.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-10-10 21:21:20+00:00): Oh désolé, vous pouvez corriger!
lakedistrict (2023-10-04 18:53:18+00:00): Thanks. Just in time for its TV appearance! :D
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-10-31 08:45:27+00:00): مرحبا بك
أقدر لك اهتمامك لكن هذا اسم المحافظة الرسمي حكومياً وهو حسب المصدر (البيانات الحكومية المفتوحة) هكذا، وعليه تم عكس هذا التغيير، وفي حال وجد مصدر يوثق أن هذه المنطقة الادارية تم تغيير اسمها نرجوا منكم وضعه وشكرا لكم
kapazao (2024-01-13 10:07:03+00:00): Hola, por favor los elementos de área no se suelen unir nunca a las vías y se deben dibujar por se perímetro real. He encontrado que la población de Pilas estaba llena de elementos conectados a vías y esto crea muchos problemas.
Por otra parte deberías revisar tus ediciones cada cierto tiempo con herramientas como Osmose (http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr) para así no cometer este tipo de errores.
Un saludo
mike140 (2025-12-16 19:01:57+00:00): No parece que haya un edificio tan grande aquí )
mike140 (2025-12-16 19:07:47+00:00): La etiqueta building=yes se coloca solo en el contorno de un solo edificio, y no en toda el área donde hay edificios.
Kovoschiz (2023-10-05 06:53:27+00:00): Please check that `=canal` includes water conveyance. It is not the usual meaning of canals for ships only.
Kovoschiz (2023-10-05 06:54:29+00:00): 2. `=drain` is for useless water. Piped and reservoir transfer water are clearly not that.
literan (2023-10-06 21:47:14+00:00): здесь нет знака "90", поэтому ставится скорость по умолчанию (RU:rural)

откачу
jimmy_conway (2023-10-05 13:39:03+00:00): Is "Muro di Zeb89" really a monument (e.g. with a sign/plate or similar visible at this place) or is this just the location of some TikTok videos? If only latter is the case, I would recommend to remove this feature from osm.
According to the rule "Don't use name tag to describe things", the name also seems to conflicts with osm rules.

Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
ivanbranco (2023-10-06 08:43:26+00:00): It's not a real monument, it's a normal wall used as a background in old videos of the italian Youtuber Zeb89.
jimmy_conway (2023-10-06 09:07:41+00:00): Then is there is justification to have this "monument" on openstreetmap? I not, I suggest to delete it.
karlottobenz (2023-10-06 09:19:27+00:00): How would you suggest I mark it instead? Even if silly I believe it should still be marked in some way on the map.
jimmy_conway (2023-10-06 09:38:11+00:00): Well, if you think this is justified to stay on the map, the leave it as it is. 
Thanks for quickly responiding to my questions!
karlottobenz (2023-10-06 09:44:05+00:00): I want to respect OSM good practice rules, if the monument tag is inappropriate for it i'd like to change it, however i don't know what other tag would fit this kind of point of interest
ivanbranco (2023-10-06 13:19:05+00:00): Non é un monumento (i monumenti sono memoriali dalla grandezza tale da poterci camminare dentro o sopra). Io lo mapperei semplicemente per quello che é (cioé un muro), come way barrier=wall o barrier=retaining_wall (se hai conoscenza locale saprai tu qual é piú corretto, a me sembra la seconda) senza nome. Puoi aggiungere la curiosità come description=* magari (qualcosa sulla falsariga di "Le scritte sul muro {le ho viste su una foto, non so se esistono ancora} fanno riferimento allo youtuber Zeb89, che qui girò una scena divenuta meme").
literan (2023-10-06 21:46:12+00:00): здесь же знак 60
https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CDU~eP2m
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 04:13:07+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164878689
Filip009 (2023-10-09 11:23:23+00:00): Dobrý deň, uvedomil ste si, že ste zmenil 76 kilometrovú hranicu poľa na cyklochodník? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/102867913/history
fabiando (2023-10-04 15:18:06+00:00): Danke für den Change.
Wollte mir nur nen Reminder machen, dass ich das updaten will. Ist besser als ich es gemacht hätte, daher danke dafür.

Ja ist ein türkisches Restaurant jetzt.
Den Klosers gibt es nicht mehr.

Ob alle Daten im Change stimmen, weiß ich nicht aber du wirst das schon ordentlich gemacht haben.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Fabian
AwFi (2024-01-09 23:17:02+00:00): Buonasera, 
ho notato che ha modificato la categoria delle linee Empoli-Siena e Siena-Chiusi da branch a main e vorrei gentilmente chiedere il motivo di tale scelta. 
Le linee mi paiono di interesse locale e comunque certamente non da "main". Inoltre RFI le classifica come "complementari" altro tassello che mi farebbe propendere per lasciarle erano, quindi branch.
In attesa di un cordiale riscontro.
un saluto e buon mapping,
AwFi
DabMK (2024-01-10 22:41:55+00:00): Ho cambiato da branch a main le linee empoli-siena e siena-chiusi data la loro importanza sul territorio della Toscana: compongono la Ferrovia Centrale Toscana e il traffico di treni è abbastanza elevato, tanto che il tratto Montallese-Chiusi è già raddoppiato ed elettrificato, mentre il tratto Empoli-Siena sta venendo raddoppiato ed elettrificato in questo momento. Infine la wiki specifica che i tratti "branch" sono solo dei collegamenti tra vari tratti "main" per collegare più città, mentre la Ferrovia Centrale Toscana è nata prima della ferrovia Firenze-Roma. Spero di aver chiarito i suoi dubbi, ricordo che questa è solo una mia interpretazione della wiki di OSM quindi ci sta che abbia sbagliato anche io
AwFi (2024-01-11 10:18:05+00:00): Certo immagino che abbia la sua importanza nel territorio toscano ma, visto il traffico passeggeri solo regionale, a parte l'interconnessione con la DD, e comunque il traffico merci è molto ridotto, secondo me non giustificano l'associazione a linea main. Si pensi che la Torino-Aosta che collega due capoluoghi di regione, ma anche la faentina e la Roma-Pescara vengono considerate branch.
Non volevo colpevolizzare in nessun modo, se è passato questo messaggio mi scuso,  non era mia intenzione, volevo solo avere un confronto sul changeset.
DabMK (2024-01-11 14:34:07+00:00): Non ti preoccupare, non l'ho preso come un messaggio aggressivo, non avevo guardato le altre linee in Italia ed effettivamente le main non sono moltissime. Non consiglierei di revertare il changeset soprattuto perchè ho fatto altre modifiche oltre a questa, quindi quando avrò tempo provvederò a cambiarle di nuovo in branch. Grazie per avermi fatto notare questo errore