piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mcliquid (2024-08-02 11:24:36+00:00): Review: Google Street View ist eine verbotene Quelle, diese darf nicht verwendet werden!
"access=yes" ist in diesen Fällen nicht notwendig und wurde von mir entfernt.
-2147483648 (2024-08-02 12:48:52+00:00): Danke für das Review, mcliquid.
Jakka (2024-08-02 12:26:43+00:00): Are those two different Holly Bagels with different entrances ?
bxl-forever (2024-08-02 15:56:49+00:00): An obvious mistake by a user’s first contribution in OSM.  There is only one business here.  I did some cleanup of all the bad tags.
rantakemisti (2024-08-02 10:18:49+00:00): I noticed that many "pienalueet" and "kaupunginosat" were tagged incorrectly or inconsistently around Kuokkala. I fixed many of these but I leave this note for others to recheck these or comment. 

The current logic based on openstreetmap wiki is:
place=suburb = kaupunginosa, like Kuokkala, Ristikivi and Hämeenlahti
place=quarter = pienalue, like Ainolanranta, Kuokkalan keskusta, Samulinniemi, Kekkola
place=neighbourhood = smaller area inside pienalue, like Suuruspää, Ainola

Not the easiest task as Jyväskylä's official taustakartta highlights names that are not official pienalue or kaupunginosa. 

The official pienalueet and kaupunginosat are in Wikipedia and on different map layers in Jyväskylä's map service:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fi:Key:place
https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jyv%C3%A4skyl%C3%A4n_kaupunginosat
https://kartta.jkl.fi/IMS/?layers=Ilmakuva&lon=Kaupunginosat&lon=Pienalueet&cp=6902009,487413&z=2
MichaOSM (2024-08-02 10:08:31+00:00): Hallo  Hedaja,
sehr schön, prima, Danke,
Micha
samuelrussell (2024-08-03 09:03:04+00:00): How does this edit control for State controlled roads and non-LGA controlled roads in the LGA that are marked by OSM as residential?
aharvey (2024-08-03 09:22:14+00:00): It doesn't. It tries to make some assumptions that mostly residential roads are controlled by the LGA and will mostly be 40km/hr. However we know that might not always be true so best to always explicitly tag maxspeed on each way.

As I understand it, these tags for setting the default aren't implying that there's never exceptions.

Do you think we shouldn't tag a default residential limit for City of Sydney in this way?
samuelrussell (2024-08-03 10:21:58+00:00): I get concerned about inherited properties where our typology and the external authorities typologies don't match.  My concern doesn't mean that it is improper.  A better match would be road-type residential && controller CoS for example if we're going to work inheritance regularly.

It also exposes problems like Collins Street residential being the terminator of the Epsom Road / Huntley St rat run; or Doody Street Tertiary versus Doody Street residential for no good reason.
aharvey (2024-08-03 22:36:05+00:00): What about if we did something like this?

def:operator=City of Sydney&highway=residential;maxspeed=40
samuelrussell (2024-08-04 05:57:32+00:00): If we are able to do something like that, it would clear my concerns entirely: any failed inheritance would be from a lack of the way controller being adequately specified.  (CoS on Parking for example tries desperately to remind people that it doesn't control a variety of streets)
aharvey (2024-08-05 01:17:53+00:00): That syntax does conform to the proposal at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Defaults so I'll change it.
joost schouppe (2024-08-02 10:16:23+00:00): Whoops. Thanks for the fix!
eggie (2024-08-02 11:04:29+00:00): Hoi  De fietsroutering klopt nog niet..
Zuidelijke Tolhuislaan zal geen cycleway=lane meer zijn, want een parallelfietspad.. Dus bicycle use_sidepath.

Ook bij de voormalige rotonde..  De delen waar je niet mag fietsen op bicycle=use_sidepath zetten.

Groet
eggie
FLupie (2024-08-02 11:43:45+00:00): Bedankt voor het meekijken eggie. Zojuist aangepast.

Groet, Ferry
nevw (2024-08-02 13:36:16+00:00): Hi, the hotel/motel appears to be already mapped and yours appear to be duplicates.
Dimacn (2024-08-04 11:59:19+00:00): Пожалуйста, свои личные точки интереса сохраняйте у себя на карте локально, не надо их вносить в общую базу. И при этом дублируя точки которые уже есть в OSM.
hwak1 (2024-08-14 14:00:26+00:00): Конкретизируйте, не понял в чем именно моя ошибка.
"Маленькие остановки" - это не мои точки, они были до меня.
Названия стоянкам типа "буратины" дал, так как это официальное название стоянок с табличкой по месту.
Dimacn (2024-08-26 14:07:32+00:00): Прошу прощения, не понял что точки с выдуманными названиями уже были расставлены до вас.
HellMap (2024-09-25 08:51:45+00:00): Hello,

You marked this parking lot [1] as public access, but there is a gate here and a parking sign with "only residents". Do you remember if something was different when you surveyed this or if you meant to tag this for a different location/parking lot?

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1135265378
HellMap (2024-10-31 11:05:00+00:00): You haven't responded to my query, so I have reverted your tagging and set this to private parking.
pitscheplatsch (2024-08-02 10:33:26+00:00): Should be checked by the local community. Thanks!
Dodko (2024-08-03 07:00:36+00:00): Na otváracie hodiny použite túto pomôcku https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ slovenský text aplikácie nerozpoznajú.
eggie (2024-08-02 10:57:18+00:00): Nu edits in Nederland.. daarom..
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
TheNixk (2024-08-02 11:00:19+00:00): Dank Eggie!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-06 10:09:52+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154729735
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-06 10:07:53+00:00): Please don't add fake ways
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154729986
Thibault Rommel (2024-11-15 21:51:44+00:00): Bussen rijden niet in twee richtingen over het Stationsplein.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218837985
Thibault Rommel (2024-11-15 21:53:14+00:00): Oneway werd intussen weggenomen, tijdelijke maatregel is voorbij
multimob (2024-11-18 10:16:46+00:00): OK bedankt voor de opvolging.
jeka p (2024-08-22 18:54:41+00:00): Hi!
ist das Boch Areal:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305227076
http://www.heikeschlauch.com/de/kategorien/architektur/page-312

SG
mcliquid (2024-08-23 14:17:27+00:00): Hi, soll ich das für dich eintragen?
jeka p (2024-08-25 11:33:18+00:00): Hi, nein - danke. Mache ich selber. Wollte nur wissen, ob es sich um das Projekt handelt.
SG
mcliquid (2024-08-25 12:03:23+00:00): Das klang von dir wie eine Aussage statt einer Frage :)
eggie (2024-08-02 11:44:14+00:00): Dag Dicky Weet je zeker dat de fietsenzaak Zwolle heet?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-08-02 13:37:32+00:00): Naam aangepast naar Fietsgoed.nl - Scholten
eggie (2024-08-02 13:38:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
user_16795792 (2024-08-02 11:01:29+00:00): Araç trafiğine Kapalı bir şekilde aktif ettim.
Enock4seth (2025-08-16 18:52:23+00:00): Hi, if you are not sure about what you are mapping please do not add it to OpenStreetMap.
BCNorwich (2024-08-02 12:49:21+00:00): Hi, Review of this changeset, firstly there are many warnings of problems as can be seen above. Some warnings are critical and need to be corrected, others are things that the mapper should look at and correct/amend to suit OSM practice.

Secondly it is an extremely large changeset, 171 features added or amended. This number of edits in a single changeset makes it very difficult for yourself or anyone to check. There are 10 warnings of crossing highways these are critical as they adversely effect routing. It will be difficult to find the crossing highways in a large changeset. It's best to limit a changeset to about 10 items.

There are problems, the first item, way 1305227907 is incorrectly tagged. it's tagged natural=tree_row and waterway=ditch. But it is on top of way 1305227972 tagged as natural=tree_row. The tree row tag should be removed from the ditch. Also it's not likely that the tree row will be in the ditch.

No more time at the moment.

Regards Bernard.
Shieldzy13 (2024-08-02 13:01:31+00:00): Bernard,

Thanks for getting back so fast.
Regarding the warnings that's strange as I went through all the warnings and thought they were corrected other than one regarding the school. Also I think it split my change into two reviews as there were actually 249. I apologise for this being so much. There was a lot in this area which was not tagged at all such as the houses. I apologise for the inaccuracies, I added one and then later realised you can add multiple to one line. That area has a ditch with trees along side so I assumed both were correct.

Thanks very much for the comments and anything you tell me I will take on board. I won't make any more changes just now until this set has been reviewed.
eggie (2024-08-02 11:47:11+00:00): Dag Gerben Die daar loopt staat onder sytroom; 150000 Volt.
Ik heb de hoogspanningsleiding losgekoppeld van je berm.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=154731855

MVG
eggie
GerbenV2 (2024-08-02 12:08:37+00:00): Dankjewel, dat is beter idd. Nog een keer uitzoeken hoe ik dat los kan koppelen als ik dat per ongeluk verkeerd gedaan heb
eggie (2024-08-02 12:14:31+00:00): Tip.. Je kunt plakken voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken tijdens intekenen.
Loskoppelen..? Volgens mij node selecteren en dan krijg je met de rechtermuisknop een keuzemenu. 
Ik gebruik editor iD niet. 

eggie
eggie (2024-08-02 12:15:10+00:00): In Josm de G toets
martien-176 (2024-08-10 19:09:37+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping.

You mapped a water reservoir here that does not exist.

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154731880
Frans S (2024-08-02 11:55:15+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not upload any single building. Upload when you want to stop or when all buildings on your task screen are mapped.
Issues found on your mappings ( all changesets)
A: Inaccurate mapping.
D: Connecting Nodes to other features.
E: Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154731968
Frans S (2024-08-02 12:46:48+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping.

B: Overlapping buildings.

E: Buildings not squared.

Mapped over existing mapped buildings.
 Buildings need to be tagged as building=yes

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154732103
z3ntu (2024-08-02 11:32:00+00:00): Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4363108
Frans S (2024-08-02 12:38:26+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
You did not tag the buildings you mapped. (building=yes)
C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.
E: Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154732143
NeisBot (2024-08-02 11:32:49+00:00): Hello Weyssouleymane Achkou Ibrahim, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/12088816652

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=154732154
Weyssouleymane Achkou Ibrahim (2024-08-02 11:56:57+00:00): I will look that
pitscheplatsch (2024-08-04 14:50:30+00:00): And?
pitscheplatsch (2024-08-02 11:43:00+00:00): I guess some of your utilized tags are not common.
JassKurn (2024-08-04 15:25:09+00:00): Hi medlineconsultancylimited,

The tagging you used was in line with the tagging we use in OpenStreetMap, and therefore wouldn't have been recognised by data users & map makers.

I've fixed the tagging in changeset - 154816735
aTarom (2024-08-02 16:33:45+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, hay un pequeño error en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305236085/history
con
build[[[ ii ]]]ng:name=Rubei
no lo corrijo por que la geometría del edificio es muy pequeña y antes de tocar nada prefiero preguntar si tienes alguna dificultad en la que la comunidad te pueda ayudar, conoces el grupo de telegram o el foro?
https://t.me/OSMes
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51
saludos
feket (2024-08-03 12:26:17+00:00): Üdv!
Szeretném megkérdezni, hogy milyen forrásból találtad a rögzített városrészek neveit? Vannak köztük számomra ismeretlenek, illetve az ismerőst sem feltétlen ott tűzném le, ahol most van.
Térképszerkesztő (2024-08-05 09:28:55+00:00): Szia!
Az e-közmű adatai alapján vettem fel a városrészeket.
Nzau (2024-08-09 17:21:10+00:00): Salut Nicolas,

Top ta contribution ! 
Je n'ai pas encore eu le temps d'y aller, mais s'il s'agit de deux pistes unidirectionnelles il faut mettre 'oneway=yes'. Et pour la couleur de l'enrobé tu peux le décrire avec 'colour:surface=red' ! 

A +
Enzo
le_geo_urb (2024-08-02 16:01:17+00:00): Dessiner tous les trottoirs nuisent à la lisibilité de la carte
Al-Hun (2024-11-28 21:59:25+00:00): Surtout ils nuisent au routage piéton car il manque de nombreuses connexions essentielles, notamment aux passages piétons. Je l'ai observé sur d'autres contributions du même auteur : c'est du dessin plus qu'autre chose...
tastrax (2024-08-03 08:06:33+00:00): Hi folks, thanks for your edits -  FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Foolad (2024-08-02 12:09:05+00:00): تولید کننده مقاطع فولادی سبک و سنگین و ریل آسانسور تحت لیسانس مونته فرو ایتالیا
busnotturno95 (2024-08-02 12:14:26+00:00): Separato Viale Libertà in due corsie per ciascun senso di marcia, stante la presenza di una separazione fisica.
Aggiunta delle fermate dell'autobus non precedentemente mappate.
aTarom (2024-08-02 17:00:54+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, quería corregir este typo
"operator"=">>> Ayuntamento <<< Roquetas De Mar"
pero con las imágenes que podemos utilizar no parece un parque acuático, es quizás un "splash_pad"?
"playground"="splash_pad"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground
me dices, saludos
keepright! ler (2025-04-24 17:23:05+00:00): Are you sure the garden shed and the paths exist where you drew them? I can only see the “fish pond” and grass on Bing Aerial.
Dimitar155 (2024-08-04 15:25:16+00:00): Знакът стоп (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12088918813) беше обърнат в грешната посока. Залепените пътища и площи правят такива номера в уеб редактора :).
pitscheplatsch (2024-08-02 12:19:08+00:00): I guess some of your utilized tags are not common.
martianfreeloader (2024-09-05 20:28:01+00:00): Hi,

this seems more like a waterway=weir:
https://www.osm.org/way/1305244419

Also, note the convention that "left side is higher, right side is lower" with this kind of features.
JanezPavelZebovec (2024-09-06 13:10:05+00:00): Hi! Thank you for note.
 I agree about weir.
Although not really understand, what you mean with the convention? Possibly my "man_made=embankment" in near, on the river? For that, I found out it really should be inversed.
martianfreeloader (2024-09-06 13:22:58+00:00): Thanks!

The direction of the way should be inverted.

"Like a natural=cliff the line direction matters: On the left side there is the high side, on the right side is the lower side."
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dweir

That means, weirs and dams should always go from the right bank to the left bank (when looking downstream).
JanezPavelZebovec (2024-09-06 13:33:29+00:00): Oh, yeah, sorry, I ve never been sure about these arrows. So they are always down, like for cliffs (I thought about it more like barrier against river).
Thanks. Errors fixed now.
martianfreeloader (2024-09-06 13:37:22+00:00): No, the way goes *across* the river, but it matters, into which direction.
giggls (2024-08-03 20:22:43+00:00): Moin,

das Zeug hier sollte nicht tourism=camp_site getagt werden. Klar, alles was on the Ground existiert sollte erfasst werden aber nicht unter missbräuchlicher Verwendung solch etablierter tags.

Ich würde mir als Tourist echt verarscht vorkommen wenn ich da vorbeikommen würde um mein Zelt aufzuschlagen.
4004 (2024-08-03 22:41:36+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
по правой кнопке мыши или клавише Я есть спрямление углов.
для правильного отображения обьектов, нужно вносить тип обьекта не в поле названия ("пиццерия") а в тип (amenity=restaurant), поиском по шаблонам
pitscheplatsch (2024-08-02 12:50:33+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154735406
citrula (2024-08-11 04:19:47+00:00): I changed the name to "Mountain Lion Circle" based on the street sign I can see on Bing streetside, but otherwise this looks good
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154735269
pitscheplatsch (2024-08-02 12:50:48+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154734941
SomeoneElse (2025-10-23 12:26:35+00:00): @pitscheplatsch what does "Revert of osm.org/changeset/154734941" mean?  Both are changesets in iD by the same user.
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-23 12:53:47+00:00): @SomeoneElse It means that the newer changeset essentially undid (reverted) the edits made in changeset 154734941. In other words, the user used iD to restore the data to how it was before that earlier edit.

I’m not entirely sure anymore whether that actually reverted all of the changes, though. Hope that helps you!
SomeoneElse (2025-10-23 13:19:53+00:00): @pitscheplatsch To be honest, in my 29th and 30th changesets I'm sure I was doing that too...
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-23 13:45:01+00:00): @SomeoneElse I see, not sure I fully understood what you meant, could you clarify?

The original edits caught my attention because they looked a bit unusual or suspicious, so I left a comment to make it clear for anyone else reviewing the changeset that it had been reverted. Of course, if you were just reverting your own normal edits in your 29th or 30th changeset, then my note wouldn’t really make much sense.
SomeoneElse (2025-10-24 12:14:35+00:00): > not sure I fully understood what you meant

In my 29th and 30th changes is was still learning how to map things - "Is X better mapped as a Y or a Z": https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/26579848 .  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/719269 was my 30th changeset, and if you look at the history of something in that https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/26579848 you can see a bit of flip-flopping between values.
pitscheplatsch (2024-08-02 12:51:59+00:00): Just a test?
Discostu36 (2024-08-03 21:04:44+00:00): Please limit your edits to a smaller geographical area per changeset, it makes reviewing your changes easier.
Bexhill-OSM (2024-08-02 15:59:14+00:00): There's some mistakes here, like adding a wood to Glyne Gap roundabout (there are no trees here just shingle). A separate garden centre which is part of B&Q and not in a building. Trees and wood are fine.
Bexhill-OSM (2024-08-02 16:31:03+00:00): I've fixed those for you. Also adjusted the wood around railway where it was overlapping some buildings and given that swimming pool a access=private tag.
James_Griffiths (2024-08-05 08:05:24+00:00): Sorry. For the Roundabout i did do that but it might have changed it back when i submitted it. I am still learning how things are tagged so im not going to get everything right. Thanks for correcting my errors though
Bexhill-OSM (2024-08-06 21:00:38+00:00): All good! Yeah the roundabout shows it being green foliage on Bing, but  it has recently been cleaned up.  Keep up the mapping :)
SekeRob (2024-08-02 15:49:37+00:00): Link of reconstructionwork: https://www.mit.gov.it/nfsmitgov/files/media/documentazione/2022-09/R_SI7_01_03%20Pescara%20Sud_%20Adeguamento%20svincolo%20SS%20714.pdf @ 6.8 million Euro, picture 3, blue way.
bxl-forever (2024-08-02 14:32:05+00:00): Pour info, tous les points à l’intérieur du périmètre ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2002638 sont automatiquement reconnus comme CP 4500.
Il est inutile de rajouter cette info sur chaque point à l’intérieur de la zone, ce n'est pas comme ça que fonctionne OSM. C’est une base de données géographiques. ;-)
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-02 14:00:40+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Aleja Armii Krajowej":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12089034477
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12089034478
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12089034479
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12089034480

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
maro21 (2024-08-03 16:18:45+00:00): poprawione
EdLoach (2024-08-08 13:39:47+00:00): I don't suppose you happened to check the road names when you were checking the speed limits? There is a notice in today's paper which has the order to make a 20 mph zone for Safrano Avenue, Armada Drive, Bettina Close, Ellna Road, and Nevada Close. Three of the names in the order differ from what is currently in OSM. Thanks.
pmmikes (2024-08-10 07:34:02+00:00): I didn't, but I will check those when i'm next there. Thank you!
LorenzoPesci (2024-08-19 15:02:54+00:00): Vi risulta che il Velino sia un fiume "intermittente"?