piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JiahuiY (2025-10-13 20:48:31+00:00): The north part of Sidney Smith St and the east-side path on University Crescent are indeed still just gravel/base layers, but there’s no active construction and they’re open for public use, barrier have also been removed (only a sign saying 'use as your own risk' I believe)
Roydon Olive (2025-10-14 10:31:06+00:00): Are they actually intended for public use? Or do they just not put up barriers? There are water main ends sticking up on the path for example.
AngocA (2025-12-23 03:40:48+00:00): Hola ithianm

Veo que estás mapeando en Colombia, y particularmente ríos, qué bien.
Te quería decir que los ríos y quebradas si llegan a un lago, laguna o represa, el flujo (way en waterway) debe mostrar cómo el flujo del agua sigue, y por eso se debe conectar a una salida de agua que puede ser otro río o quebrada.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441654630/history

Andres G
VLD549 (2025-10-22 16:49:44+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. Could you provide a link of some sort that shows it to be Hadji Oemaralistraat? I can't find it in Bing Maps.
Thank you!
Luc H (2025-10-22 19:00:27+00:00): Link is: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/5.828991/-55.241661
rhtb0 (2025-10-13 05:33:16+00:00): https://a-b-street.github.io/osm2streets/lane_editor.html
참고 바랍니다.
aaei924 (2025-10-13 13:58:30+00:00): 관심가져 주셔서 감사합니다.
주신 링크를 살펴보았사온데, 하시고자 하는 말씀이 무엇인지 조금 자세히 알려주셨으면 합니다. 이 바뀜집합의 내용과 관련이 있는 것인가요?
rhtb0 (2025-10-19 09:13:26+00:00): 저 링크의 사이트는 도로의 차로를 보여주는 사이트로 모든 도로는 중앙분리시설 등으로 물리적으로 구분되어 있지 않는 이상 기본적으로 하나의 도로가 양방향 도로로 취급됩니다. 다른 도로들도 완전히 분리된 일방통행 도로로 분리하지 않는 이상 하나만 그려야 합니다.
rhtb0 (2025-10-19 09:15:14+00:00): 시내 도로가 강변북로나 고속도로처럼 분리되지 않않아 두개로 만들면 각기 다른 도로로 나타나는걸 말하고 싶었습니다.
rhtb0 (2025-10-19 09:15:40+00:00): 않않아 오타로 않아입니다.
aaei924 (2025-10-20 06:09:33+00:00): 설명 감사합니다. 편집 기능도 있어서 차로 매핑에 도움이 많이 될 것 같습니다.

양방향 취급은 oneway 태그에 따라 달라지는 것으로 압니다. 
중앙분리대이던 울타리이던 물리적으로 중앙이 분리된 도로일 경우에만 양방향을 따로 매핑하는 부분은 알고 있습니다. 또한 교차로와 같이 일시적으로 분리시설이 없는 구간은 제외하고 판단하도록 되어 있습니다.

말씀하신 부분은 잘 참고하도록 하겠습니다.
gurglypipe (2025-10-14 14:08:07+00:00): Heya, I think there’s some confusion here.

There are two ways to tag UK addresses in OSM. The most common way is to put the settlement (Casterton) in addr:city and the street (Fern Croft) in addr:street.

Another way is to add the post town, although aiui Royal Mail doesn’t really use these since 2004, and they are irrelevant to most people. There is, however, an accepted tagging scheme for them, which would be addr:city=Carnforth addr:suburb=Casterton addr:street=Fern Croft.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom

There is a third tagging scheme for addresses which _don’t_ have a street name (which applies to many of the addresses in Casterton). I had to brush up on this one, hence me incorrectly undoing some of your addressing changes along those lines a few weeks ago. Sorry about that. If an address doesn’t have a street name, use addr:place=Casterton, and no addr:street or addr:city tags.

Putting a comma in addr:street is not one of the valid tagging schemes.

I hope that makes sense. I realise it’s a lot to read (sorry!) but addresses are inherently complex, and the tagging scheme on OSM needs to work globally.

Happy to discuss this further if you’ve got any questions :)
Hodgepig (2025-10-14 16:05:38+00:00): Hi,

there's certainly confusion, but that seems to be the case for just about any online system and addresses in Casterton! Indeed I have occasionally been unable to register my address on some websites as they refuse to accept the official format!
All addresses in Casterton, as looked up on the official Royal Mail database, are like this:
<house name> if used
<street number and name> if used
Casterton
Carnforth
Postcode

My intention ultimately is to update OSM with that data for every house in Casterton because it's a total pain for many delivery people and others to find anywhere!

Based on the wiki it looks like I need:
addr:housename (if used)
addr:housenumber (if used)
addr:street (if used)
addr:suberb
addr:city
addr:postcode 

Thanks for pointing me to that wiki page as the ID editor was offering 'addr:place' which I see is incorrect for the UK.

I will attempt to update all the Casterton addresses to that format over the next few days - as long as my edits are not going to get undone by you or someone else!

I'm curious - how come you are checking my edits?
gurglypipe (2025-10-14 16:21:13+00:00): Agreed that adding all the addresses in Casterton is a great goal, and should help with deliveries. Please note that the data in the Royal Mail address database is not licensed for use in OpenStreetMap, so you unfortunately cannot (and must not) use it to fill OSM in.

There’s some information about this on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Postal_codes_in_the_United_Kingdom

The best information which we _can_ use is the postcode centroids data, which is available in the ‘Postcode centroids’ layer in ID. It’s what Royal Mail have chosen to release freely. For cul-de-sacs and short residential roads, it’s fairly easy to associate the centroid with the street. For longer streets, or where the postcodes differ for odd/even numbers, it’s a bit harder.

You might find that if you use the format you specified, but omit addr:street (for the houses with no associated street name), then StreetComplete will start to ask you about the street names for the houses again. That’s where my confusion before arose. StreetComplete expects either addr:street and addr:city to be set, or no addr:street and addr:place instead.

This (and the fact that post towns are outdated) is why I suggest going with a combination of the first and third tagging schemes I listed (the first for addresses which have a street, the third for the others).

You could try your tagging scheme and see if StreetComplete starts to ask about street names again, though, if you wanted.

---

I (and other editors who’ve been around a while) check all the edits in the north west of England. Mostly it’s to prevent vandalism, but also helps with catching tagging mistakes or typos while the edit is still fresh. With relatively new users (such as yourself) it also means we get a chance to provide some guidance on some of the trickier aspects of editing OSM, like this! :)
Hodgepig (2025-10-14 16:41:58+00:00): Thanks. I was just saying what the official Royal Mail format should be (which does include post-town=Carnforth unfortunately). Amazon and others use 'Kirkby Lonsdale' which is a lot more sensible, but it's not the official address.

 I don't need the Royal Mail data as I live here so know every house, and the village has its own list of all the addresses with postcodes compiled independently. It's not actually too complicated as there are only about 165 houses and very few street names so once you have a few friends scattered about the place it's easy to see where all the postcodes are. If you think someone may complain and assume I have 'stolen' them from the Royal Mail please let me know and I will just leave that blank.
Hodgepig (2025-10-14 16:53:04+00:00): Just converted two addresses to name/suburb/city/postcode and StreetComplete now asks for street or place names. Doh. Personally I think that's a StreetComplete bug not fully understanding UK village address formats. I'd prefer to stick to the recommendation on OSM wiki which matches the Royal Mail format. If you agree I will carry on (but not today!)
gurglypipe (2025-10-14 17:03:10+00:00): Knowing every house and having enough friends round the village to ask them their postcodes sounds like a good approach and shouldn’t be legally problematic at all.

The problems potentially arise when people mass-copy postcodes into OSM, or state that they’ve copied postcodes from the Royal Mail database. At that point, if the Royal Mail were to notice they’d have good grounds for asserting their database rights. At best, that would mean volunteer time gets consumed in erasing the unlicensed data from OSM. I believe they have taken action against people other than OSM copying their database before (they make money by licensing it to businesses), so it’s not a baseless threat. It is unlikely though.

---

Thanks for testing StreetComplete. It’s a shame it isn’t fully compatible with the format from the wiki.

I think my inclination would still be to use a combination of the first and third formats I suggested. That would be compatible with the wiki (most of its advice around addr:place is to avoid using addr:place and addr:street together), and would keep StreetComplete happy.

While you may remember to not answer the street/place StreetComplete quests, other users in future will not, so going with addr:city with no addr:street is likely to get messed up the next time a well-meaning user who hasn’t read this discussion does some StreetCompleting in Casterton.
Hodgepig (2025-10-16 10:35:49+00:00): Hi, sorry, just getting back to look at this. As a retired IT professional using two different tags ('place' or 'suburb') for the same piece of data ('Casterton') just seems totally wrong, especially for houses that might be 50m apart in the same village. It also disagrees with what the wiki says. I think I will file a feature enhancement request on Github for StreetComplete as that's where the problem is.
gurglypipe (2025-10-16 10:44:20+00:00): Filing an issue on GitHub is a good idea. I believe the StreetComplete developers are quite responsive, so hopefully it should give good results.
Hugoren Martinako (2025-11-12 11:31:32+00:00): Non son puntos duplicados, cando teñen unha referencia INE diferente é porque pertencen a concellos ou parroquias, diferentes. Neste caso, ademais combinaches todos as etiquetas que os diferencian.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174554967
MapMakerGal (2025-11-12 17:19:21+00:00): Pódese poñer as dúas referencias para o mesmo punto, xa que dous puntos son confusos para o usuario e para todo o mundo
Hugoren Martinako (2025-11-12 18:26:00+00:00): Non, fan referencia a cousas distintas, polo que debemos seguir a regra de one feature, one element https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element, sumado a que apuntan a wikidatas diferentes e os validadores non aceptan tal cousa.

Ademais isto xa se discutiu hai tempo no foro: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/entidade-de-poblacion-dividida-en-mais-de-un-municipio/7072, non é un caso único.

Engadirei unha clave `note=` máis aclaratoria aos nodos, que adoito poñer noutros casos similares.

Saúdos
mavl (2025-10-13 04:31:01+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет непрямоугольное здание.
Ozon OSM6 (2025-10-13 07:51:54+00:00): Здравствуйте. Но ведь у этого
здания действительно не все углы прямые, а "скошенная" часть совсем не выглядит как непрямоугольное крыльцо или пристройка
mavl (2025-10-13 11:05:54+00:00): Вы утверждаете "у этого
здания действительно не все углы прямые". Вы это здание видели вживую?  
Спутниковые снимки могут содержать разные искажения (из-за съёмки под углом, особенностей освещения, помех в атмосфере типа пыли).  
  
Снимок Esri размыт в западной части здания. Я бы сказал, что на этом снимке здание вполне прямоугольное.  
На снимке Mapbox видно, что у этого здания непрямоугольна крыша. Западной стены не видно.   
На снимке Bing этого здания совсем нет.
Ozon OSM6 (2025-10-13 11:29:37+00:00): Нет, вживую не видела. Понятно, что по умолчанию здания строятся с прямыми углами, но на esri будто бы действительно скошенный угол у фундамента, да и все здания вокруг, имеющие прямые углы, отбрасывают прямоугольные тени, а у этого здания тень скошенная, я в основном опиралась на это при отрисовке. На mapbox не обратила внимания, и правда. Исправлю.
mavl (2025-10-13 13:57:40+00:00): Спасибо.
YomanNH (2025-10-13 09:44:21+00:00): W tym zestawie zmian usunąłeś istniejące wiaty przystankowe. Nie pierwszy raz usuwasz istniejące obiekty. Wycofałem.
Lokai (2025-10-13 17:09:57+00:00): Hallo,

gut dass du bei OSM Wege etc. beiträgst. Eine Frage zum Weg, steht am Weg ein Verkehrszeichen 239?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Zeichen_239_-_Sonderweg_Fu%C3%9Fg%C3%A4nger,_StVO_1992.svg

Falls nicht, dann bitte den Weg mit highway=path eintragen.

Gruß

L.
mkuentzl (2025-10-13 18:37:00+00:00): Danke! Wird angepasst.
rarad74 (2025-10-14 20:37:21+00:00): Salut. Ai stricat toata relatia multipoligonului  de la sudvest-ul tarii. Ce aveti toti cu multipoligoanele ? Asa a fost importat ca sa umple absolut tot spatiul care nu reprezinta paduri, sau altceva cu farmland. Asta se va repara cel mai probabil cu revert.
AndreyNumerus1 (2025-10-14 21:16:48+00:00): Salut. Acum am realizat ce am facut. A fost o greseala. Am avut ca scop sa conturez 2 terenuri si sa le trec la propietatea Farmland pentru un tutorial YT referitor la generarea hartiilor pentru Farming Simulator 25 care functioneaza prin acest program. Ai modificat tu greseala mea ? Daca nu , ce trebuie sa fac sa o sterg ? Trebuia sa fie 2 Ha dimensiune , nu cum e acum....Imi pare rau dar nu am observat acest lucru.
Lokai (2025-10-14 09:47:19+00:00): Hallo,

das eingetragene Gebäude ist nicht ganz rechtwinklig. Nach dem Zeichnen die Taste q drücken und das war's.

Bei path ist ohne beschränkende Schilder ein bicycle=yes überflüssig.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany
mkuentzl (2025-10-14 21:31:41+00:00): Adjusted.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-10-12 23:11:33+00:00): Merhaba. Farklı nesneleri(bazı binaları, bir mahalle etiketini, bir çeşmeyi) silmişsiniz. Değişikliğinizi gerçeğe aykırı olduğu için geri aldım. Bilginize.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173202297
habi (2026-05-18 07:00:10+00:00): Ciao Höisi
Ich gehe deine alten Änderungen durch.
Der Namen des Dorfes gehört *nicht* in den Namen des Hotels.
Bitte sei etwas vorsichtiger mit den Änderungen in Organic Maps, diese sind auf OpenStreetMap.org für alle Menschen zu sehen.
Sowie dann für alle Apps, die OpenStreetMap-Daten verwenden.
Gruss,
habi
habi (2026-05-18 07:04:02+00:00): In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182814880 korrigiert
onterof (2026-06-01 08:06:39+00:00): Hi, die ganzen building=commercial die hier hinzugefügt wurden sind ja etwas suspekt, wie bei way/1441670493 
das sind doch eher Garagen?
Betroffen sind Simmern und Umgebung und Rheinböllen.
Grüße
flohoff (2026-06-01 12:49:47+00:00): Ist ja bekannt - hast du ja geflagged im Forum. Müssen wir ja nicht hier weiter diskutieren oder willst du jetzt alle changesets dazu flaggen?
cielak42 (2025-10-12 17:08:54+00:00): Szczegóły geometrii muszą poczekać na nowe zdjęcia lotnicze.
NeisBot (2025-10-12 17:12:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-18 11:11:30+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173193161
NeisReview (2025-10-18 11:11:48+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173192198
derloris (2025-10-19 23:56:27+00:00): Hallo. Vielen Dank für die Ergänzungen. Zu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13228056269 Gemäß der Wiki-Beschreibung, die statt einer Semikolon-Verbindung hier die Aufsplittung in zwei Punkte vorschlägt, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator#When_NOT_to_use habe ich Sitzbank und Geräteladestation getrennt. LG
lankapuhelin (2025-11-13 14:17:42+00:00): Hyvää työtä Mustapuron pidätysaltaiden kartoittamisessa :) oliko sulla jokin kaupungin kartta tms. kartoituksen perustana (ja mistä sait sen), vai miten sait näin pian kartoitettua (=ennen ilmakuvia)?
perusluku (2025-11-13 15:03:39+00:00): Kiitos! :) Kaivelin kaupungin suunnitelmia (tässä yksi https://paatokset.hel.fi/fi/asia/hel-2024-003584/80b4d5a1-8f2f-4cea-aa9b-08260f320b0e), kävelin alueen läpi ja otin muutaman valokuvan. Näillä sai aika hyvin arvioitua sijainnit, mutta ilmakuvista sitten lopullinen tarkennus. Tiedän ainakin että eteläosan altaita voisi tarkentaa, patomaisia rakenteita lisätä kartalle ja en ole ihan varma tuliko suunnitelman kaikkk polut toteutettua
jbcharron (2025-10-24 18:55:20+00:00): Bonsoir,
Merci pour vos contributions
Pour information, sur un rond point on doit ajout le tag junction roundabout pour indiquer explicitement que c'est un rond-point, je viens de corriger
Bonne soirée
Jean-Baptiste
Comino (2025-10-12 19:46:21+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
hatul (2026-02-08 11:36:52+00:00): שלום משה

האם יש פה שער שסגור להולכי רגל? זה השביל הרגיל של נחל תבור.
hatul (2026-02-12 20:36:11+00:00): בדקתי ואין שער חוץ מהמחסום לרכב שכבר היה במפה. בבקשה להיזהר בהוספת מחסומים. תודה.
joost schouppe (2025-11-20 14:11:23+00:00): Is er een reden dat je hier de naam van de mall verwijderd hebt?
Jakka (2025-11-20 14:13:52+00:00): niet direct terug erbij
Comino (2025-10-12 19:45:05+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
archie (2025-10-12 18:22:39+00:00): Hej, kolla här om taggningen "highway=rest_area" stämmer: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Drest_area
mtekla (2025-10-12 18:27:02+00:00): Ok, du som vet får gärna tagga om den.
Mian Hamza Athar (2025-10-25 21:43:58+00:00): Dera Mian Hamza Athar
Comino (2025-10-12 19:45:21+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
dafadllyn (2025-10-25 09:16:39+00:00): Salut
Hier befindet sich nirgends ein Caritas Markt, weshalb ich ihn wieder gelöscht habe. Der Caritas Markt in Bern befindet sich an der Könizstrasse 19a, wo er bereits eingezeichnet ist.
Gruss
dafadllyn (2025-10-25 09:17:26+00:00): Link zum Caritas Markt in Bern: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3118355100
sheldonelectric (2025-10-25 15:18:55+00:00): It was a mistake on my part. That's the location of the Caritas office, on 1st floor. https://caritas-regio.ch/ueber-caritas/bern
sheldonelectric (2025-10-25 15:23:55+00:00): I put it correctly now osm.org/node/13256093126
dafadllyn (2025-10-25 21:20:22+00:00): 👍
BCNorwich (2025-10-13 05:14:04+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap..

The AED is positioned within the garage outline. Which looks like it's not accessible to the public, as access+yes implies? Can you please correct your map position and tags to something logical? If not then the POI ought to be removed.

Regards Bernard.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-12 18:51:04+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3111819896
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338942909

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
UnusualWorld (2025-10-14 00:26:52+00:00): Hello there, is there any reason you deleted that address node that was, from what I gathered, correct? In the meantime I have re-added the address node. Thank you.
Szymson (2025-10-12 19:24:51+00:00): Pytam po raz kolejny - dlaczego zdublowałeś adres Skalskiego 13?
StC (2025-11-05 22:09:42+00:00): Bonjour,

une fois de plus, un commentaire inutilisable. Et une fois de plus, des itinéraires dont la continuité est brisée par une modification de chemin. Je vais tenter la correction, une fois de plus.
Map_Team (2025-11-06 07:10:47+00:00): Bonjour, Il me semble mais je dois me tromper que le principe d'Open Street Map est la contribution volontaire, je me trompe ?  Donc tu fais comme moi tu contribue pour améliorer l'existant, si j'ai cassé des liens ce qui est possible tu fais comme moi quand je constate des erreurs je corrige. Par principe quand une personne participe bénévolement à une tâche la seule chose a faire c'est de la remercier.
InfosReseaux (2025-11-06 08:05:30+00:00): Bonjour
Je regrette mais cette interprétation n'est pas la bonne.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Do_correct_errors

Améliorer l'existant concerne la qualité globale de la base de données par rapport à ce que nous voyons sur le terrain. Ce n'est pas repasser après les autres qui ont manqué de soin.
Je suis donc de l'avis de StC :
* Commenter de manière plus détaillée les changements faits
* Veiller à ne pas casser de continuité existante
* Utiliser la fonction "Vérifier mes changements" lorsqu'on soumet des modifications dont nous ne sommes pas sûrs

Bonne journée
Fraxi (2025-10-12 20:53:35+00:00): Hi! Thank you for your contributions!    Naming streets in Bulgarian, without "ул." or "street" and quotation marks is the usual practice. See:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bg:WikiProject_Bulgaria#%D0%98%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B8_%D0%B8_%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B4%D0%B8
So I'll have to fix the name.
YomanNH (2025-10-28 07:56:20+00:00): Zamiast usuwać dobrze zmapowany ciąg pieszo-rowerowy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364218493/history lepiej było usunąć drogę dla rowerów będącą obok. Teraz utworzyłeś źle zmapowane dwie osobne linie. Przypominam, bo już dawno temu o tym mówiłem: ciąg pieszo-rowerowy to jedna linia highway=path, tak jak jest to opisane tu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-14 06:22:16+00:00): Hello!

Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4411266657/history ?
Romwriter (2025-10-13 18:23:39+00:00): Hallo dieter60, vielen Dank für Deinen Beitrag. Ich wundere mich, dass die Häuser Nr. 109 und 111-113 jetzt nicht mehr an derselben Baulinie ausgerichtet sind wie die übrigen Häuser an der Straße, und dass das Haus Nr. 117 fünfeckig ist. Ist das richtig? Beste Grüße, Romwriter
(PS: Das Haus Nr. 67 hat eine verkehrte Geometrie, aber das schon seit 11 Jahren... das würde ich bei nächster Gelegenheit mit korrigieren.)
dieter60 (2025-10-14 11:30:22+00:00): Vielen Dank für deinen Hinweis, da war ich etwas oberflächlich - sorry
- Habe die Bauumrisse präzisiert
- Eingänge hinzugefügt
- Nr 67 korrigiert
Romwriter (2025-10-14 20:38:46+00:00): Ich danke Dir!
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-13 03:42:49+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2903595182
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/902348225

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
AndyB_66 (2025-10-25 19:03:17+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian