piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GBAB (2024-11-09 11:30:59+00:00): Kedves Levente!

Alighanem kicsit elbeszélünk egymás mellett…

1. Mit jelent az, hogy felbontottam egy multipoligont? A multipoligon egy kapcsolat, ami arra van kitalálva, hogy ábrázolni lehessen "lyukas" objektumokat. Mondjuk egy tavat, amelyben vagy egy sziget, vagy egy nagy épületet, amelynek van egy belső udvara. A multipoligonnak van egy külső és egy belső szegélye, és a kettő közötti terület a tulajdonképpeni objektum.
Tudományosan leírva itt:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Viszont arra is van lehetőség, hogy több külső szegélyt is megadjunk, és így a multipoligon több egymáshoz nem kapcsolódó darabból fog állni. Egy elrettentő példa ez:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12220828
Ezzel az a probléma, hogy ez _egyetlen_ szántóföldként van ábrázolva, jóllehet a valóságban egymáshoz nem kapcsolódó szántóföldek összessége. Ezzel az a gond, hogy nagyon kényelmetlen szerkeszteni.

Amit én csináltam az annyi volt, hogy az egymáshoz hozzá nem érő darabkákból önálló multipoligonokat (vagy – ha egyetlen vonalból álltak – egyszerű sokszögeket) készítettem. A térképet nézve nem lehet látni a különbséget. Vagyis a korábban már felrajzolt erdők területén nem változtattam. Valaki más rajzolta föl őket előttem; alighanem vakulya.

(Ezt egyébként láthatod, ha a lenti vonalakra vagy kapcsolatokra kattintasz.)

2. Az erdőtörvényt nyugodtan felejtsd el. Az OpenStreetMap szempontjából nincs jelentősége. Semennyi.

Az OSM-en azt térképezzük, amit látunk: ha egymás mellett szép nagy fák nőnek, akkor az erdő, ha meg nem, akkor az nem erdő. Teljesen mindegy, hogy a jogszabály erre mit mond. Aki az erdőt akarja járni, és kíváncsi arra, hogy hol járhat árnyékban, azt az érdekli, hogy hol vannak fák, nem pedig azt, hogy mit mond a jogszabály.

Ha van egy tarvágás, akkor az a terület átváltozik mondjuk bozóttá. Pl. a Pilisben Lajos-forrás és a Kő-hegy között tarra vágtak kb. 15 évvel ezelőtt néhány erdődarabot. Az most nem erdő, hanem rét vagy bozót, még akkor is, ha a bozót tölgyekből áll. Ha majd akkorák lesznek a növények, hogy erdőnek lehet őket tekinteni, akkor valaki átcímkézi a területet erdőnek.

3. Amit a Börzsönyben mesélsz, az jó megoldásnak tűnik. Mindazonáltal nem nagyon elegáns több landuse címkét használni egymás tetején (bár egyáltalán nem ritka). Talán csinosabb, ha a vágás helyén „kilyukasztjátok” az erdőt jelentő multipoligont, aztán majd ha felnő az erdő, akkor „befoltozzátok” (vagyis törlitek a multipoligon belső tagjai közül a tarvágást). Persze ez több munkát meg odafigyelést igényel, úgyhogy megértem, ha nincs hozzá túl sok lelkesedésetek…

Gábor
TthL (2024-11-09 17:36:55+00:00): Szerintem is elbeszéltünk egymás mellett.

A hozzászólásomat nem jó helyre írtam, nem neked kellett volna.

Egyébiránt szerintem hogy ki mit tekint erdőnek, az egy szubjektív dolog, egy térkép meg minél több objektív elemet tartalmaz, annál jobb. De hát az OSM már csak ilyen :-)

Üdvözlettel,
Levente
TrickyFoxy (2024-09-26 08:30:57+00:00): Нельзя брать данные из 2gis
TrickyFoxy (2024-09-26 08:31:41+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157115329
StC (2024-10-05 10:00:07+00:00): Bonjour,

je ne vois pas de changement de signalétique sur le terrain, et le cheminement des vélos semble assez confus tant le long de la ligne de tram qu'en arrivant à la porte de Versailles. N'est-ce pas un peu prématuré de faire la modification sur la carte ?
Benoît C MdP (2024-10-07 07:20:32+00:00): En réalité, elle n'a pas été supprimée durant les JO. C'est un itinéraire provisoire lié à la construction de la tour triangle. Effectivement, c'est un peu confus sur le terrain, mais cela permet aux cyclistes de remonter vers le nord.
StC (2024-10-07 07:57:01+00:00): ce qui m'a interpellé c'est la signalisation au sol qui est effacée ou recouverte de noir, comme si le tracé n'était plus d'actualité
Andrew Chadwick (2024-09-26 09:54:54+00:00): [review_requested=yes]

Thanks for this. Council websites seem to know of the name, and refer to "the towpath between Fiddler's Island and Sidelings Island" a lot.

Is it really heavily wooded enough to call the top bit a wood? Calling the bottom bit a meadow feels like a stretch too. From memory of squeezing past next to the marina fence, it has a lot of foot and bike traffic, definitely no grazing, and it's too narrow and raised to offer much in the way of flood protection compared to the surrounding area.

Perhaps the "wood" and the "meadow" ends should be de-named, and a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dislet drawn for the islet as a whole?

Relation 15454091 should be an area, but that wasn't your doing.
addedentry (2024-09-26 10:17:53+00:00): Creating one islet seems sensible, yes please!
I won't have a chance to check on the ground any time soon, unfortunately.
HellMap (2024-09-26 12:51:49+00:00): Can you please clarify why this road segment [1] is private if there are no signs here, at least at the time of my survey. Is there a sign further down the road? This appears to be a municipal road, which continues until the Bisenieki property. It in fact has a sign that says it's only a deadend in 700 meters from the intersection. [2]

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1263700337

[2] https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=356201300855087&focus=photo
HellMap (2024-10-02 12:00:11+00:00): You haven't replied to my message, so I have reverted your change for now.
大山かなめ (2024-09-26 08:35:16+00:00): ウェイ493222179はもともとエリアとして描かれた歩道で、可能な限り生かすことを考えましたが
位置が全面的にずれており修正が困難なためエリアではないウェイの歩道に修正しました
SomeoneElse (2026-01-17 13:29:09+00:00): Please don't use ChatGPT to make up English names for e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7252225925/history .  If something doesn't have a name in English; that's OK - we don't need to invent one for OSM.  If anyone wants to translate or transliterate an actual name they're entirely at liberty to do that.
(linked from https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/grokipedia-usage/140596/4 )
AlaskaDave (2026-01-18 05:43:20+00:00): I use AI generated infrequently. But I wonder if this is any worse than the historic practice of using the :th-Ltn version of the name for name:en? Even though name:th-Ltn is meant to be more pronounceable than the original Thai,  it's often utterly meaningless to a non-Thai speaker.
SomeoneElse (2026-01-18 13:12:46+00:00): The "name:th-Latn" is a version of a Thai actual name - I wouldn't expect it to be easy to pronounce by an English speaker., the same way a French person might struggle with "Hampsthwaite" or an English person with "Fermanagh".
The problem with any "made up name for OSM" (regardless of where from) is that it's made up.
nyampire (2024-09-27 05:08:04+00:00): 編集をレビューしました。
再開発が実施されていることは事実ですし、ちょうどこの範囲と重なりますので、問題ないかと思います。
面白いお店が多かったエリアなのでさみしくはありますが、再開発が終わったらまたマッピングしましょう！
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157116139
habi (2024-09-26 08:54:02+00:00): Sorry, wrong changeset comment. Should have been "Split building; Conflate GWR data; Closes https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4452265". Using https://qa.poole.ch/addresses/GWR/6452.osm.zip for adress data.
JoaoPaixao (2024-09-26 09:57:16+00:00): Please limit your editing area as much as possible. In this case, you made changes in different countries, where there was no need.

And if it is extremely necessary to make edits with large areas, at least be more descriptive in the comments section of the changeset. "European trains fix" is too vague.
adamos (2024-09-26 10:21:07+00:00): OK, sorry for that. Fixing broken relations based on an Europe-wide PTNA list of errors: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/EU/EU-Eurotrains-Analysis.diff.html
Hope I did not make lots of troubles putting then in a single edit.
rskedgell (2024-09-26 14:35:58+00:00): For areas like this, an alternative is to map the area as area:highway=footway together with a linear highway=footway through the centre. Although pedestrian areas are rendered on the "default" OSM Carto map tiles, they're really intended for areas where routing should be omnidirectional rather than linear (although it doesn't actually work with many routers). Although area:highway=footway isn't rendered by OSM Carto, it is by some 3D renderers.

If you add a footway for a pavement, you'd need to add footway=sidewalk to it and sidewalk:*=separate to the parent road.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:area:highway%3Dfootway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian#How_to_map
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
9_tab (2026-07-31 11:30:23+00:00): level:ref=EG 
or
addr:floor=EG 

would have been preferable. One can't be certain that EG = OSM level 0.
habi (2026-07-31 13:44:19+00:00): This was related to https://github.com/OpenBracketsCH/defikarte.ch-app/issues/194, where the Defikarte-App added the level as free text.
The correction was the semantically most correct.
9_tab (2026-07-31 14:31:40+00:00): That seems to be what you wrote there, but why? 

How would the users of that app have known that 1.OG is level=1 and not level=2 in OSM? I think they just reproduce whatever is signed in the building and the OSM key for that is level:ref or addr:floor, not level.
habi (2026-07-31 19:13:58+00:00): > How would the users of that app have known that 1.OG is level=1 and not level=2 in OSM

That was what we discussed in the issue (and over email). The app has since been changed to only allow for entry or numeric levels, corresponding to the proper `level‘ key.
habi (2026-07-31 19:18:32+00:00): Did you see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/Habi#%60level=EG%60_on_Defibrillators for documentation and https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/access-no-auf-defibrillatoren-in-der-schweiz/118013 for (related) discussion?
aceman444 (2025-02-08 14:18:21+00:00): Zdravim, na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/179743531 naozaj vytrhali tie betonove panely? Alebo ste videli len kusok cesty z druhej strany, kde naozaj panely nie su, a dali ste fine_gravel na celu cestu? A to tiez pochybujem, ze je tam fine_gravel, mozno tak na nejakych malych usekoch. Davajte pozor na taketo veci. Cesta ma 2 km, tak ak ste ju nepresli celu, nezdavajte jej povrch. Alebo nepouzivajte aplikacie, ktore robia takeho chyby.
Tomas_J (2025-02-08 19:35:40+00:00): Čus, panely tento úsek vobec nemá.  Je to imho fine gravel alebo možno na menšej časti dirt. Priznávam ale že som to asi nastrelil podľa toho, čo som videl z vlaku, po celom úseku som neprešiel.  Dám pozor a nabudúce rozdelím.  Btw: aplikácia chyby nerobí, ale užívatelia:)
aceman444 (2025-02-12 23:16:19+00:00): No neviem, ci z vlaku je mozne rozlisit gravel a dirt hlavne na takom dlhom useku. A urcite z vlaku nevidite, aky povrch je pri druzstve, je to daleko od kolaji: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1358156217 . Je vidiet aj na Ortofoto, ze su tam panely.
Rovnako aj cast https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259424803 a tam ste to vidiet mohli, je to rovno pri vlaku :)
Tomas_J (2025-02-12 23:32:10+00:00): Dám pozor a nabudúce rozdelím. 

Tu su panely?: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259424803
Tomas_J (2025-02-12 23:53:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259424803 som opravil
CBRE Engineering (2024-09-26 14:22:51+00:00): Hallo, durch diesen Änderungssatz oder vorherige welche gleich definiert sind mit Level=EG to Level=0, wurden ganz viele Gebäudebezeichungen entfernt, welche in unserem System Relevant sind um das Gebäude zu finden. Beispiel dazu sind die Gebäude im Werk Klybeck Kleinbasel. (Suche nach IFRB Magazin Klybeck).
habi (2024-09-26 14:44:34+00:00): Wie du in https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=157117463 siehst, wurden hier *keine* Gebäudebezeichnungnen entfernt.
Ich schaue soeben die anderen Changesets an, in denen ich die falschen `level`-Tags korrgiert habe.
habi (2024-09-26 15:09:49+00:00): Wenn ich nach dem IFRB Magazin suche, kommt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4073533298 zum Vorschein.
*Alle* Gebäude da drum habe ich nie berührt :)
Teilweise wurde aber vor 2 Monaten in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154481278 einige Namen in `ref` umgewandelt (was so auch sinnvoll erscheint).
Wenn das das Problem ist, dann habe ich das Gefühl, dass 'euer System' angepasst werden muss...
totera (2024-10-18 08:55:29+00:00): Hai taggato come residential con superficie pietre (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40040865/history/11) questa "strada": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Cupa_di_posatora_43598603_13494675.png e hai cancellato (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239121913/history/3) questo sentiero: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Cupa_di_posatora_43597288_1349479.png che seppure non comodo né ben visibile è esistente e percorribile a piedi, ed è anzi fondamentale visto che permette di aggirare la Casa Rossa, il cui accesso secondario che tu hai segnato come percorribile (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1318338873/history/1) è invece sempre chiuso.
Non è la prima volta che mi imbatto in tue modifiche infondate... potresti per favore rivedere le tue modalità di contribuzione, mappando soltanto ciò di cui hai conoscenza?
Tra l'altro, visto che si tratta di un progetto collaborativo, se dalle immagini aeree credi che qualcosa non esista prima di cancellare sarebbe opportuno provare a chiedere agli autori delle modifiche precedenti
f_gonella (2024-10-21 08:39:20+00:00): @Totera Grazie per le correzioni
Warin61 (2024-09-27 00:49:00+00:00): The pool ways have far too much resolution! They have been simplified with an automatic tool - maximum error of 0.5 meters.
user_21880486 (2024-09-28 20:36:21+00:00): Hi there Warin61,

So what if the pools high resolution? I don't see a problem in that

-computerOwl
Warin61 (2024-09-29 07:19:51+00:00): Issues;
Data bloat
Who needs more accuracy than 0.5 metres? Consider most people would be unable to resolve 0.5 metres...
user_21880486 (2024-09-29 21:11:37+00:00): True- but holding down space and just putting your curser around complex shares like pools which have like 100 different circles in them, is much easier. I understand where your coming from, and next time I won't go so... overkill.
Warin61 (2024-09-30 09:32:16+00:00): Done it myself - trees in the blue mountains... That automated tool put me in my place. Usually the tool is run with a 5 meter acceptable accuracy .. I run it with 0.5 meter as that to me retains more of the actual shape.
Ethan Grobin (2024-09-26 13:42:20+00:00): Hi,
You deleted the address 230 Albion street, any reason to remove it?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157118104
rant-better (2024-09-26 22:00:35+00:00): As I filled in the buildings and addresses I was shortening the address interpolation line since it wasn't needed for parts that have individual addresses. 230 was attached to the line so I removed it and replaced it with it's own address marker.
Ethan Grobin (2024-09-27 01:15:54+00:00): Sounds fine then
Patchanka (2024-09-30 08:42:24+00:00): Bonjour

merci beaucoup pour l'ajout des noms de voies. Par contre, pouvez-vous prêter attention aux majuscules, accents, etc ?
En comparant avec votre BAL (merci pour sa publication) par exemple "Avenue des Grands Lacs" dans la BAL, devient "Avenue des grands lacs" dans OSM. Autre exemple : "Place Saint-Jean" dans la BAL devient "Place Saint Jean" dans OSM. Tant qu'à faire autant mettre les mêmes intitulés, surtout que votre BAL a l'air de bonne qualité (ce n'est pas partout le cas !).

N'hésitez pas à demander si vous avez besoin d'aide, notamment pour l'ajout des adresses dans OSM.

Merci d'avance et bonne journée
Christian Weiss 777 (2024-09-26 10:21:04+00:00): Danke, es war mir nicht bewusst, dass es die Möglichkeit gibt, einen alternativen Namen anzugeben.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157118444
ThatOneFilipinoExtremeist (2024-09-30 01:25:48+00:00): Hey not bad, I may have been in that specific area before and was planning to map out this here but that is really accurate!
A_Prokopova_lyft (2024-09-30 10:30:16+00:00): Hi ThatOneFilipinoExtremeist,
I’m Anastasia. I'm an OSM communications specialist on the OSM mapping team at Lyft. 
Thank you for the feedback! It's great to know the mapping is spot on. 
Best regards!
Andrea Musuruane (2024-09-27 09:45:21+00:00): La way 219506986 e' la palestra. Quindi non ci sono due livelli. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157119578
ivanbranco (2024-09-27 10:51:50+00:00): Sistemato qua: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157165000
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-26 10:21:02+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5869332591
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/421685714

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ivanbranco (2024-09-28 10:40:55+00:00): Hi Tenerife Peak,

what's the meaning of the start=*,end=*,note:sanitation=* and ref:city=* tags?

you added smoothness=p to 518 elements, could you fix it please? https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1RSQ
ivanbranco (2024-09-28 10:44:04+00:00): Also note:sanitation_quality=*,note:sign_quality=* and note:traffic=*. Most of these tags seems to be used only in this city.

"You can use any tags you like, but please document them here on the OpenStreetMap wiki" (from: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like#Documenting_tags_not_in_Map_Features)
TenerifePeak (2024-10-01 14:06:18+00:00): Hello there,
Thank you for reaching out about the additional tagging here for these street features.
I did not add these tags originally but extended the road at, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1318347993 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1318347994 , which carried over the pre-existing tags added by other users. Upon review, I agree that these tags are unusual and I can remove them from the features I extended. However, you may want to reach out to Alberto ngatia (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/alberto%20ngatia) regarding the smoothness=p, start=*, and end=* tags they added, and SOGEFI (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SOGEFI) who added the note:sanitation and ref:city tags originally.
Thanks again and happy mapping!
ivanbranco (2024-10-01 14:13:57+00:00): I see, I probably checked an element you split. Thanks for investigate further, I see that these tags are at least 10 years old...

thanks and good mapping
map per (2024-10-06 16:21:40+00:00): Because of review_requested:
This edit looks good, thank you!
map-maker-pro (2025-03-03 14:14:37+00:00): Hi! Thank you for your edits.
TrickyFoxy (2024-09-26 16:09:44+00:00): Обратите внимание на https://www.opengeofiction.net/
eggie (2024-09-26 11:28:42+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik... Bij deze Opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
citrula (2024-09-30 19:56:59+00:00): Address does not belong in the name tag, unless it's the actual name. Also, is the landuse=commercial that you added actually being used in that way? The most recent imagery (esri from 2024-08-15) still shows this as undeveloped land. Please don't try to use landuse areas to encode local zoning.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157121987
ph4ni (2024-10-02 12:53:37+00:00): Why did you change the geometry when you have no local knowledge?

All bus route relations are disturbed due to this.
ph4ni (2024-10-02 12:56:08+00:00): Even the satellite imagery confirms that there are clear dividers between roads. How could you even merge them?
infeeeee (2024-09-30 10:50:39+00:00): Szia!

A highway=primary-ra felvezető bekötőutakat, min pl ez, highway=primary_link-kel kell címkézni: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary_link
gmar5 (2024-10-09 15:32:38+00:00): The street signs mark Queen St as a designated pedestrian area, the pavement is levelled and people certainly use it as a pedestrian street. (Compared, for example, to George St, which has traffic restrictions but certainly feels more like a normal road).
Wouldn't highway=pedestrian be a better descriptor? All access tags are correct anyway.
Ethan Grobin (2024-09-26 13:31:26+00:00): https://files.catbox.moe/ed6irg.png

Why did you make the building sizes bigger than the buildings?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157123591
Ethan Grobin (2024-09-26 13:33:59+00:00): The building area should cover the building not the plot :)
Ethan Grobin (2024-09-26 15:42:44+00:00): Sorry you mapped correctly, I missread the edit. Ignore my above comments.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157123591
rant-better (2024-09-26 22:09:44+00:00): cheers
sahshoor (2024-10-16 11:37:34+00:00): Hello again :) I corrected the demolished building by removing the building tag.
citrula (2024-09-30 16:09:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use the expanded form of street names ("Nickleby Pl" -> "Nickleby Place")
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157123883
eggie (2024-09-26 12:13:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Kun je niet komende vanuit de Eeuwsel linksaf?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-09-26 12:15:34+00:00): De straatnaam Maalstoel ontbreekt nog.
eggie (2024-10-09 08:47:57+00:00): Dag doc... Adresnodes horen gewoon op de gebouwen. Dus niet op de straat zelf. Wat is je bedoeling.

Je edits..   Ik draai even wat terug.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-10-09 08:48:47+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=157125020

Ik heb de adresnode teruggeplaatst.
MVG
eggie
Ethan Grobin (2024-09-26 13:24:27+00:00): Why did you remove the address?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157125295
Ethan Grobin (2024-09-26 13:26:04+00:00): The names may have changed but it is unlikely that the addresses have.
rant-better (2024-09-26 22:08:51+00:00): Hi realeatham. I moved the businesses to a node instead of the building as I thought best practice was to have businesses on nodes instead of buildings unless the building is significant itself. For example it will now shows as a Vietnamese Restaurant called Hao Phong instead of a building called Hao Phong on OrganicMaps.

I guess this comes back to what you mentioned on the Brunswick edits. Do you think the standard is the put all information on the buildings instead of nodes? What if there are multiple businesses in the same building? Happy to adjust to fit what is common practice in Melbourne.
Ethan Grobin (2024-09-27 02:06:59+00:00): Yes, thr business go on nodes as far as I've seen. The addresses go on the building tho. I don't remember what you did here exactly, but I think you removed address data? I will check when I am at my computer.
rant-better (2024-09-27 02:09:45+00:00): I did remove the addresses from the buildings, as I thought it might double up with the business one. Makes sense to have both. I'll put them back on. Thanks for the comments.
mariotomo (2024-12-17 16:29:53+00:00): hi. from the aerial picture I don't see it. is the bridge already there, but (obviously) not yet working as railway? maybe you want to tag it as construction:railway=monorail, that is, adding the corresponding life cycle prefix.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
I am not able to intervene, because I do not know which is the case.