piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:39:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321385 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Cambodia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:41:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321459 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Indonesia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:41:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321459 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Indonesia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:44:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321594 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - South Sudan
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:38:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321352 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Azerbaijan
bxl-forever (2025-11-10 11:35:16+00:00): The address was already on the map https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12064738244 and is already properly linked to the object.

Please do not duplicate addresses.
We fixed your edit.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:45:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321638 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Uzbekistan
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:41:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321489 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Kyrgyzstan
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:45:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321638 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Uzbekistan
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:45:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321638 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Uzbekistan
RobotFK (2025-11-10 08:18:05+00:00): Source Website
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:45:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321633 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - United States
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:39:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321388 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Canada
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:44:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321617 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Turkmenistan
mavl (2025-12-07 05:54:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175610079 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19113].
FS Patagonia (2025-11-14 17:12:20+00:00): Los accesos mapeados NO EXISTEN: El único acceso a la Av. Los Paraísos desde la RN22 es por la rotonda de Casimiro Gómez (Solo Eslovenia tiene salida a RN22 hacia el este). Por Favor, no guiarse exclusivamente con imágenes satelitales.
Char_Vad (2025-12-25 13:34:30+00:00): Hi FS Patagonia, thank you for making the corrections.
foreigner037 (2026-06-01 09:24:03+00:00): Здравей,

запознай се с начина на именуване на улици в OSM. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bg:WikiProject_Bulgaria#%D0%98%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B8_%D0%B8_%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B4%D0%B8

Добавяне на ул. пред името на улицата не е препоръчително.

Също така smoothness=intermediate;good освен че е алогично е и грешно. Или едното или другото може да е вярно, но не и двете.
infeeeee (2025-11-10 15:39:09+00:00): Hello! Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

If you can't speak Hungarian reply, and I will translate this to English.

Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Tavaly még volt korlátja, idénre lebontották? : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=955479726599707

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség#Elérhetőségek

További jó térképezést!
GaussTheWolf (2025-11-10 18:41:08+00:00): Szia,

Vak vagyok, az északi lépcsőkön van korlát, csak nem láttam. Másikon viszont nincs.
infeeeee (2025-11-10 19:23:12+00:00): A szélén levő mellvéd is egy fajta korlát. A legfontosabb felhasználása ennek a címkének szerintem az, hogy mozgásukban korlátozott emberek, akik csak akkor tudnak használni egy lépcsőt, ha van valami kapaszkodó, ők így megtalálhatják a nekik való útvonalat. Én a másik lépcsőt is korláttal rendelkezőnek címkézném.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=375117875567188&focus=photo&x=0.537627510799419&y=0.4529946347037157&zoom=0.8498869894178652&lat=47.477491462254&lng=19.061136655487&z=19.9
infeeeee (2025-11-10 19:24:26+00:00): Ha meg nagyon bele akarsz menni a részletekbe, akkor handrail:left és handrail:right címkékkel megadhatod a pontos helyzetet: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:handrail
GaussTheWolf (2025-11-10 19:56:11+00:00): Végül is meg lehet érvelni, hogy handrail, még ha nem is lehet rendesen ráfogni.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:45:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321633 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - United States
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-26 07:15:32+00:00): DWG revert - uncertain information from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140043
Vinber-Pro (2025-11-10 17:22:55+00:00): Bonjour,

attention, 2 remarques ici :

- les points sont créés au milieu de la route ? cela m'étonnerait que le cabinet se trouve la :)
- les infirmières c'est healthcare=nurse je pense que je referai une passe dessus car il y a un mélange j'ai l'impression entre amenity=doctors et healthcare=yes pour décrire des infirmiers, infirmières

à plus
PS : nous nous sommes vu samedi nous sommes d'accord ?
sebcadier (2025-11-10 18:41:11+00:00): Salut,
Oui nous nous sommes vus samedi :-)
Il y a un PB avec l'adresse connue sur la db de l'assurance maladie, le numéro 36 n'existant pas. J'ai prévu de vérifier en contactant les infirmières concernées.
sebcadier (2025-11-12 06:55:25+00:00): corrections faites, effectivement la confusion vient du doc remis samedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/thumb/f/f6/OSMecum-sant%C3%A9.pdf/page2-1753px-OSMecum-sant%C3%A9.pdf.jpg.
Merci
Seb
Vinber-Pro (2025-11-12 07:58:25+00:00): oui je viens justement de récupérer la version modifiable de l'OSMecum, je vais la mettre à jour pour tout le monde comme cela :)
dzamper (2025-11-10 16:36:35+00:00): To nie był wandalizm
Naprawdę jest taka sieć sklepów która się tak nazywa…
I on w tym budynku faktycznie był: https://maps.app.goo.gl/WsPYaXWaEnhRWBWj6
Ale chyba go już chyba nie ma: https://8stars.com/pl/nasze-sklepy
Hanys1871 (2025-11-11 14:24:19+00:00): A tak, 8stars... No nic, dodam tam Modena Nails
Sylabowy Kot (2025-11-10 09:21:20+00:00): Na pewno wymaga to dodatkowej korekty, ale trzeba było ująć brak możliwości przejścia przez ten grassland.
Muhmaker (2025-11-12 06:48:16+00:00): Moin,
ich wollte nur kurz einen Hinweis geben, dass du bei der Freigabe einen Mini-Wegstück auf einer Brücke übersehen hast: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122398774 
Aber möglicherweise war das ja auch genau so geplant von dir weil die Freigabe sich laut Medien noch um etwa eine Woche verzögert. https://www.radioguetersloh.de/nachrichten/kreis-guetersloh/freie-fahrt-auf-der-b61-zwischen-rheda-wiedenbrueck-und-guetersloh.html
flohoff (2025-11-12 21:57:02+00:00): Hab ich in der Tat übersehen.

Morgens hiess es noch wird freigegeben und mittags dann "Kommando Zurück" - Ich hätte es einfach schon in OSM Freigegeben und wollte da nicht dann noch drei mal hin und her editieren.

Flo
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:39:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321366 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Brazil
TrickyFoxy (2025-11-11 23:29:03+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее
Prius5678 (2025-11-12 00:11:28+00:00): Спасибо! Так и сделаю.
habi (2025-11-10 09:37:26+00:00): Hier wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5044108, das damit erledigt ist.
bartgron (2025-11-26 20:40:20+00:00): Usunięto:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175171642
Donlooba411 (2025-11-30 16:51:19+00:00): l'œuvre existe mais est recouverte par une construction / étagère du bar Xurasko..
Patchanka (2025-12-08 18:23:58+00:00): oups !
J'ai annulé la suppression et j'ai ajouté un tag "note" pour préciser cette info.
Il y en a une autre rue de la Salie que je n'ai pas trouvé non plus, je vais mettre un fixme dessus pour vérification

bonne soirée
Donlooba411 (2025-12-09 08:07:41+00:00): ok cool, merci, bonne journée !
pitfire (2025-11-10 12:16:55+00:00): Hi staka-RBK_06,
gibt es den "Wegverlauf: 79847501" nicht mehr? Jetzt ist es nur noch eine Linie.
VG pitfire
staka-RBK_06 (2025-11-11 07:32:55+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, bei der Teilung scheint das Attribut verändert worden zu sein. Ist wieder geändert. VG Markus
Glassman (2025-11-11 22:12:56+00:00): #TIP: when roads go through a building, Split the building and tag it as building=roof + layer=1. In somecases you'd need to add a tunnel through the building but in this case the imagery shows what looks like a roof
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174453670
Olga Lomako (2025-11-12 14:10:48+00:00): Hi! Thank you for your feedback. I will correct this case and take it into account in the future. Best regards, Olga.
user_5359 (2025-11-10 09:46:50+00:00): wrong comment: change Node=Conflicts to fixme=Node conflicts!
Luzandro (2026-05-11 07:06:29+00:00): see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sultans-trail-hiking-route/143718
PPete2 (2026-05-21 07:47:42+00:00): Dear @MS50, would you be so kind to answer the latest question regarding the Austrian part of Sultans trail in the forum. This will help the Austrian OSM-community to evaluate how to deal with this part of Sultans trail in our country, thank you!
MS50 (2026-05-21 10:54:05+00:00): Yes, I will. Searching for time to redpond properly.
MS50 (2026-05-24 07:17:25+00:00): Hi PPete2, replied in the forum.
PPete2 (2026-05-24 18:13:48+00:00): Thanks MS50!
dahu83&04 (2025-11-21 16:07:44+00:00): bonjour, pour quelle raison avez mis toutes ces barres rocheuses ?
Juste par curiosité et comment avez vous repérez autant de barres ?
aetius (2025-11-21 17:36:21+00:00): Bonjour - 
1) OSM est nu pour le relief ce qui est inadmissible : beaucoup explorent en terrain sauvage et c'est un élément de sécurité de savoir la disposition des barres. 
2) avec le Lidar
streckenkundler (2025-12-06 16:59:10+00:00): Hei, ...nur zur Info: da gibt es auch eine Note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4864943

Wenn du es einschätzt, kannst du die ja schließen...

Sven
mavl (2025-12-07 05:55:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175610079 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19113].
habi (2025-11-12 19:06:15+00:00): Alles ausser `highway` in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174572885 revertiert.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
rempshaener (2025-11-10 17:53:39+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe folgende Anmerkungen:
- Derzeit ist das Gebäude nicht rechtwinklig. Falls es das in der Realität ist: markieren, Q drücken, fertig.
- Bei building bietet sich ein building=fire_station an.
- Neben dem Gebäudetyp wäre es wichtig zu ergänzen, dass es sich um eine Feuerwache handelt. D. h. es fehlt noch ein amenity=fire_station
- Die o. a. Eigenschaften (bis auf building) sollten am besten nicht am Gebäude, sondern am Gelände gepflegt werden.
- Unter name werden in der Regel Körperschaft + Einheit angegeben. Raus sollte demnach das „Feuerwehrhaus“

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
GyDomonkos (2025-11-10 21:44:09+00:00): Hallo,
die obigen Punkte habe ich nun korrigiert, eine Frage ist aber jetzt aufgetaucht: wie sollen die großen asphaltierten Flächen (Feuerwehrhausausfahrt, Parkplätze hinterm Gebäude für die Einsatzkräfte) am besten dargestellt werden?
Vielen Dank im Voraus für die Hilfe!
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2025-11-11 18:20:36+00:00): Hallo,
Parkplätze wären amenity=parking, am besten aber mit access=private.
Wenn du neben den Wegen auch die Flächen darum erfassen möchtest, bietet sich area:highway an, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:area:highway bzw. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Area_highway/mapping_guidelines. Das wird aber nicht von vielen Karten dargestellt.
Viele Grüße
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:35:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
VLD549 (2025-11-17 14:37:03+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. 
I am pretty sure that the part slagerij & partyservice is not supposed to be in the name. It should be mapped differently.
Perhaps you could check? (As I am not a professional mapper).

Thank you for your contributions!
Zrop (2025-11-10 11:43:35+00:00): Hallo 42dp,
aus welchem Grund hast Du den Baumaschinenverleih XRent in einen Werkzeugverleih geändert ? Hat sich da was geändert ?

Gruß
Zrop
user_23410287 (2025-11-15 18:38:43+00:00): Bereits korrigiert.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
maro21 (2025-12-08 19:44:18+00:00): Dlaczego cały teren ma mieć taką nazwę? Mieści się tu nie tylko Tauron Dystrybucja.
maraf24 (2025-12-09 08:55:10+00:00): Wg tabliczki przy bramie.
Co się tutaj jeszcze mieści? Nie mam takich informacji.
maro21 (2025-12-09 23:28:56+00:00): Bo nie pasowało mi, że w środku jest jeszcze Tauron Obsługa Klienta https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2247678187/history (a może go tam już nie ma, bo dodany 12 lat temu)
maro21 (2025-12-10 00:08:37+00:00): Usunąłem punkt Tauron Obsługa Klienta i teraz jest ok.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
bxl-forever (2025-11-10 11:32:23+00:00): Hello,

This edit contradicts the access permission for service vehicles, which had been explicitely set in the previous version.
Can you review the changeset title for version 12 here and confirm that the situation has really changed?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24581540/history/12

Also, please be aware that "designated" is meaningless as an access tag in Belgium.  This is a problem with the iD editor, but "designated" only makes sense in the UK or Germany, not here.  We use foot=yes and bicycle=yes, and not foot=designated or bicycle=designated.

If it is a cycleway, just add "highway=cycleway" and possibly add "foot=yes" if it is shared with pedestrians.  Nothing more.

It is recommended to avoid piling access tags like "access=yes" (allow everyone) + motor_vehicle=no (disallow motor_vehicles). This approach always creates unwanted drawbacks for routing (it allows mopeds, horses…)

You may want to have a look at this table, to understand how many default access tags apply as long as you set it as a cycleway, footway or normal road.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Belgium
LeuvenNeedsTrams2 (2025-12-04 19:29:59+00:00): I've just attempted to correct it in changeset 175514441. Thanks for the feedback!
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:38:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
kucai (2026-03-15 08:28:50+00:00): Why do you draw footway on a building outline? They need to be distinct
trial (2025-11-13 17:40:02+00:00): Pourquoi avoir indiqué une absence de dalle podotactile alors qu'elle est parfaitement visible sur l'orthoimagerie ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&changeset=174456211#map=21/47.7451229/-3.3611759
Vaïnamoïnen (2025-11-23 16:53:30+00:00): Il n'y a pas de bande podotactile sur le trottoir d'en face, il y a du il y avoir des travaux. Voir la photo ci-dessous
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PassagePieton_Lorient_QuaiDeRohan-PalaisDesCongres.jpg
trial (2025-11-23 20:41:32+00:00): Bien vu ! C'est le cas de le dire.
Je crois que dans ce cas quelqu'un avait suggéré de marquer half (plus ou moins en blaguant, car peu utile pour le routage des mal voyants, mais utile pour savoir le pourquoi et éviter une modification malencontreuse ).
Carto75 (2025-11-11 10:36:35+00:00): Bonjour et merci poiur votre contribution. Pour les adresses je vous recommande vivement d'utiliser l'outil en ligne pifomètre qui vous permettra d'intégrer beaucoup plus d'adresses plus facilement.
URL pour saint Donan : https://bano.openstreetmap.fr/pifometre/pifomap.html?insee=22287&ratio=no#map=15.91/48.447297/-2.884199.

J'ajoute les autres adresses de ce hameau.
bigopenmac (2025-11-14 20:38:58+00:00): Ты зря овал в кольцо превратил. Тут не типично они сделали. Имено овал и даже на знаке круговое движение нарисован не круг, а овал.
Prusaker (2025-11-15 06:38:26+00:00): ммм, я в кольцо специально и не делал, я просто ограничения на съездах с кольца добавил и материал покрытия.
Ipeh_peh (2025-11-17 10:14:39+00:00): Halo mas, kal boleh tau, kenapa ya buat jalan di jalanyang sudah ada?
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
aTarom (2025-11-10 11:42:17+00:00): Hola, la key
"parking:orientation"
puede ser
"orientation"
creo que se retiró masivamente por el 2023
Saludos
kapazao (2025-11-10 21:39:50+00:00): Sí, fue un error al hacerlo con JOSM que al no tener recomendación o preset no lo recordaba.
Ya está corregido.
Un saludo
mavl (2025-12-09 02:23:06+00:00): Здравствуйте. Номер дома записывают в виде 71 к3.
Ozon OSM16 (2026-07-01 08:28:33+00:00): Здравствуйте, все исправлено
Kiss_Karoly (2025-11-11 20:03:18+00:00): Pontosítok, javítok, kiegészítek. Nem fogom így hagyni. Kis türelmet kérek, ha tetten érnének javítás előtt.
ilias_ (2025-11-10 17:57:08+00:00): Bonjour, pas besoin de rajouter "Place piétonne" comme nom. C'est la Place des Nations Unies, et le nom existe déjà sur OSM. Merci!
Strubbl (2025-11-10 19:24:03+00:00): Hi keren-hap,
Du hast das Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404071192 in eine Wiese umgewandelt. Das soll doch nicht so, oder?
keren-hap (2025-11-10 20:19:35+00:00): Nee, das sollte nicht so.
Danke!
Ich weiß, wo der Fehler lag, wird nicht nochmal passieren :)
Strubbl (2025-11-11 19:12:15+00:00): Kein Problem, soll ich das rückgängig machen oder machst du?
pepsi_max2k (2025-11-13 07:10:16+00:00): Is the new military area correct? Now covers various public roads / businesses / cemetery / open land / trails that, as of a year ago, were very much not restricted (eg. Border ran north from eastern edge of micket shooting complex, designated by fence and signs along track). Unless they’ve taken over this entire in the last year?
pepsi_max2k (2025-11-13 10:03:35+00:00): This is the beat map of the robertson area from earlier this year. aA few differences. https://www.defence.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-05/Robertson-Barracks-2025-Ongoing-Monitoring-Plan.pdf
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-14 23:02:43+00:00): I think so? Worked off https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4210582, discussions with a local mapper, & also comments I saw from teh Micket Creek Shooting Complex that said that their danger area extends into Defence ground to their immediate north.
pepsi_max2k (2025-11-15 05:19:29+00:00): Re shoal bay I’ll stick this back up to litchfield boundry but not sure this is correct. Micket Creek probably mean north east, and I jogged the boundry last year and the fencing / signage to restrict access to defence land is along the eastern edge (where the area was originally mapped), but that’s not to say they don’t own it up to litchfield.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-12 10:15:50+00:00): która część https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18909 była niezrozumiała?
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
eggie (2025-11-10 14:00:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:34:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-07 19:59:54+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13294289033/history has aeroway = 18 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
olehz (2025-12-08 08:28:41+00:00): Typo. I wanted to add runway threshold. Fixed
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-08 11:45:54+00:00): seems to not be
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-09 12:51:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5335144
Eren00 (2025-11-10 14:51:16+00:00): Zaten Sivas'taki bütün yollar zamanında yol hiyerarşisine göre yeniden düzenlendiğinden ikincil olan bir yolu üçüncül olarak alınmasına gerek olduğunu düşünmediğim için değişikliğinizi geriye aldım. Zaten caddenin bir tarafı birincil yola, bir tarafı D200 karayoluna bağlandığı için caddenin ikincil olarak kalması daha mantıklı olacaktır.