piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-16 16:46:20+00:00): Sorry, I meant: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175949054
eggie (2025-12-14 19:20:49+00:00): Beste Johnny..

Geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt aangepast.

Mvg
Eggie
ivanbranco (2025-12-17 14:11:32+00:00): Hi unbiased_outcome,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1458550296

link=* isn't a documented value, maybe you could use source=* in such cases.

Also the highway name was correct before, as Italian guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Nomi_delle_strade

by the way welcome to OSM and happy mapping!
NeisBot (2025-12-15 06:31:17+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Cleaning service in La Mesa"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisRevert (2025-12-15 06:39:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175945603
where the comment is: "Remove unclear map edits"
NeisReview (2025-12-15 06:40:43+00:00): 🔴 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by https://osm.org/changeset/175945643
LordGarySugar (2025-12-14 20:49:55+00:00): Why not keep the way present, tagged disused:highway=cycleway or similar to prevent the cycleway from being re-added by mistake?
tagishsimon (2025-12-14 22:02:34+00:00): Fair point. I've added an abandoned:highway & a note.
Norbert Dichter (2026-01-04 17:18:39+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175932970
I-76 (2025-12-15 00:21:50+00:00): Ayyy 1k

Progress…
Comino (2025-12-14 22:59:31+00:00): Hi,

Please state the reason for the deletion in the changeset.

Edwin
JohnDoe202 (2025-12-14 23:18:53+00:00): Unable to verify address as was provided by Square import. 
Related to #btcmap issue#2292
Necessarycoot72 (2025-12-14 21:00:51+00:00): *added/updated CDP/admin_level 8 boundaries in california 

My bad, i forgot to change the changeset comment.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-08 19:42:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13376659322/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this edit
Would it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )
Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house )

Something else?
NeisBot (2025-12-14 21:16:11+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (4 changesets) shows that 368 of your last 459 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23592973
jetbridge guy (2025-12-14 21:19:00+00:00): Yes, they were intentional. The jet bridges were labeled with the building tag
NeisReview (2025-12-15 06:42:59+00:00): 👍 Looks good!
tkk (2025-12-15 08:32:02+00:00): Ahoj, nově zmapovaná informační cedule a bod záchrany mají dost podivné ref, nechybí tam nějaký středník nebo něco podobného v hodnotě tagu?

https://osm.org/node/69236625
https://osm.org/node/7909878363

Diky tom.k
VSA_ (2025-12-15 10:09:19+00:00): Ahoj,
zde jsou fotky obou tabulek. 

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/0pycrwot1evgyowg7dw35/APPr0dMYCz5QHvtk4MCR5WY?rlkey=sjl4g6q5dl3c8bvvnhedhx5qf&st=fbaei5tq&dl=0
tkk (2025-12-15 10:19:53+00:00): OK diky, ten emergency je asi tim padem OK, ale ta cedule je ROK PROVOZOVATEL a mozna REF, zkusim to nejak aktualizovat. Muzu dat tyhle fotky rovnou do Fody, at je to ke kontrole k dispozici?
VSA_ (2025-12-15 10:57:45+00:00): Jasně, fotky jsou k libovolnému pouzití.
eggie (2025-12-14 21:14:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Wanneer daar een camera zit zal het ongetwijfeld kloppen. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-14 21:28:05+00:00): Hier de wiki.. maar die heb je vast wel bekeken..
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man%20made=surveillance?uselang=nl
RuleVR (2025-12-14 21:33:08+00:00): Bedankt voor je bericht met de nuttige linkjes. Ik weet zeker dat daar een camera zit.
Unbeatable101 (2025-12-14 23:55:26+00:00): Hi Trevor, I'm just curious why you would classify this as secondary rather than secondary_link? I've never been quite sure what to tag them as, since they are basically an extension of the highway ramp, but tagging them as such didn't seem right.
plennert (2025-12-15 06:58:27+00:00): Hallo GoTheMan,
warum hast du an das TG 

"layer=-1" 

angehängt?

Viele Grüsse
plennert (2026-06-15 07:39:53+00:00): Hallo GoTheMan,
konntest Du Dir das nochmals anschauen?
Viele Grüsse
user_5359 (2025-12-15 06:54:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/6284633523 more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position. If you need help, you are welcome!
great mathias (2025-12-16 06:50:58+00:00): Sorry about that. Not entirely sure what i did there, but I have put the node back where it belongs.  Thank you for letting me know.  I will for sure pay more attention to what im doing.  thanks again
BCNorwich (2025-12-16 06:29:23+00:00): Hi, I've removed several highways you added because they duplicated existing highways and could disrupt routing.

Some improper names removed from fields.

Regards Bernard.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2026-01-27 02:26:11+00:00): Please don't connect bridges or tunnels to the roads or streams they cross.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175936337
Norbert Dichter (2026-01-04 17:18:22+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175936468
notmyproblem1 (2026-01-14 21:04:27+00:00): Hi Niels Elgaard Larsen!
Thanks for staying in La Spezia!
I did see some problems with your mapping like;
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13376749618/history isn't the city name La Spe*z*ia and not La Specia?

-
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205841529
This seems to follow the roundabout speed limit (which is 30)

-
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249003579
Would be a better idea to cut the way until there's the correct speed limit

-
Seems these are small problems not major problems. Let me know if I picked it something wrong!
notmyproblem1 osm
omfg_notpr on Mapillary
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2026-01-18 12:56:41+00:00): I corrected the name.

way/205841529 :
way/161247036 has maxspeed=30
but not the roundabout I believe.
notmyproblem1 (2026-01-18 16:01:51+00:00): Oh! Sorry! Thanks for your edits to fix it!, Have a good day!
riolu (2026-02-24 20:16:50+00:00): The bus stop names seem to be slightly misspelled
Ale_Zena_IT (2026-02-25 09:39:15+00:00): Hello, thank you for the notification.
I checked again 100 bus_stop around the changeset and I can't see any relevant error.
there are some official abbreviations that could lead to a not local thinking to an error, like  Loc. (abbreviation for locality), S. (abbreviation for Saint), F.S./FS (train station), civ/civ. (abbreviation for housenumber) and SCOL related to school service.
I've corrected C.Colombo and S.Margherita (to C. Colombo and S. Margherita), FS to F.S. (more used way) and a few others.
If you still see something odd, I'd be happy to correct.
Thanks again
democat (2025-12-15 06:30:35+00:00): Hey there, and thanks for your contribution! This edit looks OK! If you're adding a business, be sure to add a new point with specific tags.
gmar5 (2025-12-15 11:36:43+00:00): Hi. 

Is this real? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1458589932

It looks mostly just like a field, with mowed grass. I am not sure it warrants mapping as a runway, even if private individuals were to occasionally use it for that. Especially considering the rendering is very intrusive.

The only reference I see online is from a flight simulator, with "fictional" in the title. https://flightsim.to/file/46769/egur-boars-hill-private-airstrip-oxford-fictional
NieWnen (2026-05-16 23:08:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2407673800

Cześć

highway=bus_stop nie powinien być na obszarze. Na węźle było w porządku.

2 oddzielne obiekty jako wiata i przystanek są jak najbardziej ok.
taxi301 (2026-05-17 07:31:00+00:00): poprawione
NeisBot (2025-12-15 06:33:19+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/862907339 v2 | 10 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175938069
Ouosamu (2025-12-15 09:19:33+00:00): Yes, there are a lot of crossings, but all of them are like service entrances and exits, and you're unlikely to see cars on them. On the contrary, you can see a cyclists, using this line.
I made some edits because RWGPS and Strava services draw a fantastically complex route patterns instead of drawing the route along this line. In addition, there is a road sign that says that this is a path for pedestrians and cyclists.
Taya_S (2025-12-15 11:33:29+00:00): Revered questionable removals. See: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wikidata-osm-cross-project-vandalism-report/139298

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175955333
Hashmush (2026-07-10 11:11:22+00:00): Hej, jag är lite nyfiken på vad du har för källa på de här kullarna? "Local knowledge" är inte så specifikt 😅

Jag vet ju att de existerar, men var kommer höjden ifrån? Är intresserad av att använda samma till andra höjder om möjligt
Hovastro (2026-07-12 10:56:10+00:00): Ungefärlig GPS-höjdmätning och kontrollerat mot höjdkurvorna på lantmäterikartor. Behöver nog en bättre mätning egentligen, precisionen på de angivna måtten är ju typ plus minus fem meter.
Hashmush (2026-07-12 11:58:00+00:00): Aha, okej. Tack för info!
balint36 (2025-12-31 00:01:16+00:00): Miért kapott a vágány MÁV nevet?
Balázs Szulovszky (2026-01-03 22:38:40+00:00): Nem tudom, melyik attribútum adja a nevet, de a MÁV a pályakezelőnek (operator) van megadva.
NeisBot (2025-12-15 06:31:23+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "salon services for hair care"
---
برای مثال، یک نسخه خنثی‌تر و واقع‌بینانه‌تر از توضیحات شما می‌تواند این باشد: "خدمات سالن برای مراقبت از مو"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisRevert (2025-12-16 16:47:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/176014572
where the comment is: "Remove unclear map edits"
editing_user (2026-01-15 04:07:21+00:00): If this proposed infrastructure was deleted (has nothing to do with VBZ  timetable 2026 changes) then all proposed infrastructure should be deleted
d_berger (2026-01-16 17:28:56+00:00): You're correct. I just hadn't the time to remove everything, because of all the glued nodes, that belong to real OTG objects. Should be fine now.
editing_user (2026-01-16 22:10:36+00:00): which proposed infrastructure should be on OSM? as the NES has removed ideas which exist in Richtplanung
d_berger (2026-01-17 14:44:11+00:00): None. It violates the on-the-ground principle. We don't map ideas.

I left Tram Affoltern & GTB Kloten, because at least they are in the legislation process, however one could argue that they don't belong in OSM until their construction starts. HTH
editing_user (2026-01-17 16:11:00+00:00): Tram Affoltern & GTB make sense. So the proposed tag is futile on OSM?
felipeeugenio (2025-12-15 12:26:47+00:00): Hola.
Eso es asfalto, no concreto. Son superficies distintas.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175939099
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-20 20:41:50+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13376960525/history has shop = equestrian that was added in this edit
shop=equestrian ?
Maybe shop=sports + sport=equestrian would work here equally well or better? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/issues/29
user_5359 (2025-12-15 06:50:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Sorry, but business entries without addresses are not in line with OSM. Please add the street and house number, or we will have to mark this as SPAM.
I have now reverted your changes.
b-jazz (2025-12-18 19:54:59+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1458602858, et al

When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. If you could go back and clean up where you've made this mistake, that would be helpful. But more importantly, if you could stop from doing this in the future, it would be greatly appreciated. Please read the wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out.
eteb3 (2026-07-12 22:10:08+00:00): Hi

Re Pole transformer here: 13377003701

Is there a typo in the name? The river is called Nant yr Ychen
kitsee (2026-07-13 06:45:40+00:00): Hi Eteb,
Names are taken automatically from the raw data. I've double checked and this is how the name appears in the raw "NANT YR YCHAIN" 

they were not too stringent with the names so it is possible it was originally an error but these names are the official names given to the transformers so I don't think it can really be corrected. There are also many transformers named after structures which have been gone for 50 years such as schools and the like. which have the same problem where the name doesn't match the surroundings anymore.

unfortunately there is no motivation for NGED to updates names.
eteb3 (2026-07-13 08:00:03+00:00): Thanks. I’ll leave as is. I’ve added a “sic” note to the node.
JoeG (2025-12-31 00:27:13+00:00): Hi! I intend to revert deletion of fences and footway=sidewalk in this one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175939616
Gregory Peony (2025-12-15 01:20:00+00:00): You correctly resolved a duplicate footprint here, though Ithink the southern footprint should have been squared. I think the footprints you added represent buildings and that the NW one should be round.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175939742
JoeG (2025-12-31 00:24:57+00:00): Hi! I intend to revert deletion of fences and footway=sidewalk in this one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175939941
rskedgell (2025-12-15 06:35:14+00:00): (Review requested)

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately, this edit deleted the tag ( man_made=survey_point ) from the trig pillar on Iping Common which tells data consumers what sort of map feature it is. I've reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175945440

If you're making edits which don't relate to a particular HotOSM project, please change the auto-generated comment to reflect what you're actually doing. You may find https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments helpful.
rohieb (2025-12-19 01:34:17+00:00): Hi! Magst du bitte für zukünftige Änderungen eine sinnvollere Zusammenfassung als "Automatisch erzeugte Zusammenfassung" verfassen? Hinweise dazu findest du im Artikel https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Mauersegler (2026-03-22 16:07:34+00:00): Not yet finished. Path definitely continues in SE direction. Will continue tracking this summer, time allowing.
user_5359 (2025-12-15 06:48:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition!

Please remember that an address must consist of at least a house number and street name (additional information such as city, country and state can be calculated using the available boundary data).
user_5359 (2025-12-15 06:47:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1458615301. You miss the key addr:street.
bxl-forever (2025-12-20 11:40:36+00:00): Hello,

For the record, names in Australia are in English by default.  There is no need to add "English translations" by duplicating the exact same data.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017037544/history
You added "name:en"="Long Gully" to this cycle track… but the "name" tag was already set with this name.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/797751493/history
You added "name:en"="Parmalat Ltd." to this area… but the "name" tag was already set with this name.

Same for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/684286896/history and countless others I will not mention.


Could you please also use real changeset titles, accurately describing the content of each edit.

Using a generic title like "Modified places and roads" for every single edit—and you uploaded several hundreds, possibly thousands edits with an identical description—helps no-one and makes your edits look suspicious, as if you are trying to hide something.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks in advance.
NeisBot (2025-12-15 02:26:11+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 369 of your last 443 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23385061
maddog107 (2025-12-15 04:46:00+00:00): Yes this was intentional, there were lots of wrongly placed/marked things and i had to delete the features. For example hole 5b was just a square of rough, so I deleted it and marked the bunker, green, and tee box.
NeisReview (2025-12-15 06:43:30+00:00): 👍 Looks good!
maddog107 (2025-12-16 06:25:04+00:00): Thx!
Supaplex (2025-12-16 10:51:11+00:00): 您好：

OpenStreetMap已經是相當的計劃，很難預料第三方資料使用者何時取用資料，甚至就會把測試性質資料也收進去。如有測試需求請到測試站進行
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dev_Server_Account
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175941328
dknelson9876 (2025-12-28 21:55:29+00:00): Hey dmcg12, thanks for adding all of these. The issue was that while highway=stop and highway=give_way nodes belong on the highway=* way, traffic_sign=maxspeed nodes belong at the position of the actual sign, not on the highway=* way. While checking all of the street names I think I caught all of them and fixed them for you.
dmcg12 (2025-12-29 01:21:38+00:00): As I was researching how to add the signs, I found two ways: on the highway=* way and at the sign position. I decided to put them on the way (which I now know is the wrong way for maxspeed signs), and mark the changeset as review requested in case I was wrong. Thank you for letting me know the correct way to add maxspeed signs.
sosquqer (2025-12-17 08:31:28+00:00): 👋 Why did you change the forest to a retail area and renamed it to a plateau?
b-jazz (2025-12-18 21:39:24+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1248229983, et al

When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. Take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Golf.png for an example of the "Wrong" way to map a fairway and a green along with the right way. There are some cases where a fringe exists around a green and you should draw the fairway outline completely around a green, leaving room for the fringe. Other times, the fairway and green butt up against each other. In that case the fairway and green should share the same nodes at the boundary between the two, and every node at the boundary needs to be shared leaving no gaps. When drawing these shared nodes, editors like iD (built into openstreetmap.org) will "snap" to an existing node if you get close enough. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out. Thanks.
BMACS001 (2025-12-15 05:08:08+00:00): Having been advised of the standard import procedures, I intend to revert this as soon as my rate-limit expires
BMACS001 (2025-12-15 05:08:04+00:00): Having been advised of the standard import procedures, I intend to revert this as soon as my rate-limit expires
BMACS001 (2025-12-15 05:07:58+00:00): Having been advised of the standard import procedures, I intend to revert this as soon as my rate-limit expires
BMACS001 (2025-12-15 05:07:54+00:00): Having been advised of the standard import procedures, I intend to revert this as soon as my rate-limit expires
BMACS001 (2025-12-15 05:07:46+00:00): Having been advised of the standard import procedures, I intend to revert this as soon as my rate-limit expires
BMACS001 (2025-12-15 05:07:40+00:00): Having been advised of the standard import procedures, I intend to revert this as soon as my rate-limit expires