piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
EvanSiroky (2023-12-08 05:26:50+00:00): Hey there! I'm a local mapper from Scotts Valley, CA. I see that you requested a review of this changeset, so I'm giving it a review.

All the changes made here look great! If you're looking to make even more edits about businesses, I'd highly recommend you check out either the EveryDoor or StreetComplete apps which both make adding information about businesses really quick, easy and fun to do while you're out in the field.

Happy mapping!
MarcoR (2023-12-06 09:25:13+00:00): Questo changeset è stato annullato perché ha modificato un edificio in un modo non corrispondente alla realtà

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144820696
Taya_S (2023-12-07 14:04:41+00:00): Hallo Dalfsenaartje,

Ik vroeg me af wat de bron is van al deze hondentoiletten die je hebt toegevoegd in de omgeving.

Groeten,
Taya
Dalfsenaartje (2023-12-07 14:40:58+00:00): https://www.dalfsenkaart.nl/hondenvoorzieningen
SomeoneElse (2023-12-05 22:38:03+00:00): This user was blocked at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15449 and then deleted their account.  The user name was "SοmeοneElse" which is "SomeoneElse" spelt with omicrons instead of lower case "o"s.
It is likely a sockpuppet of https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Olaf%20der%20Mapper .
MattijsLeon73 (2023-12-05 22:28:02+00:00): Oeps vergeten een comment te geven. 
"Fixing multiple Osmose issues and improve areas around them"
Glassman (2023-12-06 21:45:59+00:00): From the imagery, it appears that a road exists on what was once a railrail bed. As long as a feature exists, it can and should be mapped in OSM. It is appropriate to tag it as no access if it is posted as such.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144808909
Jason Brown CdA Tribe (2023-12-06 21:58:44+00:00): What you are viewing on aerial imagery is not an established road.  It is the abandoned railroad bed that continues to be illegally used and accessed as a thoroughfare.  Simply designating/tagging it as "No Access" does not prevent people from mapping routes in Strava/Garmin, etc. and continuing to illegally access the Coeur d'Alene Tribe's private property.  I'll reiterate the entire route/line within the Coeur d'Alene Tribe Reservation boundary has NOT been designated a recreational trail which Open Map labels as the Palouse to Cascades and/or John Wayne Pioneer Trail.  At a minimum the currently designated route should be clipped to not route through the Tribe's property.
Jason Brown CdA Tribe (2023-12-06 22:26:56+00:00): You should also be aware that within the State of Idaho and the Coeur d'Alene Reservation land does not have to be posted as Private or No Access.  It is incumbent upon the person recreating to insure that the property they are accessing is open to the public.  Your "Relations (1)" below are somewhat humorous to me.  If we are going to verify accuracy, please show me, where the "Palouse to Cascades State Park Trail" has been designated by the Coeur d'Alene Tribe or even the State of Idaho as a recreational trail, open to the public.  I'll save you the research, it hasn't.  It has however been done so in the State of Washington, which does not have the ability to extend that designation into another State and certainly not within the Sovereign boundaries of the Coeur d'Alene Tribe.
Glassman (2023-12-07 01:42:46+00:00): I think we are getting off to a bad start. I'm only trying help you edit successfully in OSM. OSM is a community project with over a million volunteer mappers and a few paid ones by large corporations like Amazon, Meta (Facebook), and others. One of the standards of OSM is that we map what is on the ground—including in places where it is against the law to do so, such as North Korea or even China.

You are certainly correct in removing the name of the Cascades State Park Trail. If it doesn't exist there it shouldn't be tagged. However, if there is a road there, it should be tagged. 

And I fully agree that Washington State can't designate features in another state let alone the Coeur d'Alene Tribe or any tribe within Washington State for that matter.
pertile (2023-12-06 12:41:46+00:00): this is wrong
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144809071
LabelMaker (2023-12-06 22:11:21+00:00): Hello pertile, I see you commented something similar on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144809204. Please refer to my response in the thread of this changeset which applies to both instances.
tyfi (2023-12-05 22:50:04+00:00): The ref tag correctly marked this as MO H, but there's no reason to keep wrong import data around
luisforte (2023-12-05 23:10:38+00:00): A localidade tem a designação Casebres.
Pára pf de dar nomes incorretos às localidades; nem todas as freguesias tem uma localidade com o seu nome.
O nome da freguesia já existe na relação que é onde podes colocar o link para a wikipedia.
Sugiro que reponhas a situação anterior.
LF
luisforte (2023-12-06 14:33:14+00:00): Esquecia-me que tu ignoras por completo os commentários aos teus changesets.
Assim, repus o nome anterior e eliminei a "aldeia" que criaste.
Glassman (2023-12-06 21:48:14+00:00): I disconnected your landuse nodes from the power line. They should never be connected. 

Also - parcels are not mapped in OSM. The entire area is already marked as natural=wood. landuse=forest implies that it is harvested.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144809186
Jason Brown CdA Tribe (2023-12-06 22:01:04+00:00): Parcels should be mapped.  By not mapping you are encouraging illegal access across the private property.  Those areas that I delineated should remain or should be restricted from routing through.  Those delineated areas are private property owned by the Coeur d'Alene Tribe.
Jason Brown CdA Tribe (2023-12-06 22:10:23+00:00): In my capacity as the Recreation Mgmt Program Manager of the Tribe I am very confident that what I've stated is correct.  Those areas that I delineated are private property, owned in title by the Tribe.  The original area of forested is a mixture of tribal and non-tribal ownership.  I obviously cannot grant permission or speak on those parcels not owned by the Tribe, except for I'll stand by my original purpose of removing the designation of the Palouse to Cascades Trail and/or the John Wayne Pioneer Trail designation and/or the ability of people recreating to route through the Reservation on that Trail.  It has NOT been designated a recreation trail for public use by the Tribe as it has been in the State of Washington.  The Tribe has specifically declined, in writing to all interested parties, to designate the abandoned railroad bed as a Trail.
Jason Brown CdA Tribe (2023-12-06 22:13:24+00:00): An editor obviously initially incorrectly designated that Palouse to Cascades Trail extending across the Tribe's Reservation established by executive order.  I'm adamantly disputed that.  The name alone for that Trail initiates from the State of Washington, NOT within the State of Idaho or more specifically the Coeur d'Alene Tribe Reservation Boundary.
Jason Brown CdA Tribe (2023-12-06 22:20:01+00:00): It's disturbing to me that someone, an editor, incorrectly delineated that path or trail extending into the Tribe Reservation and there was no verification that what was being delineated was correct.  The Tribe simply wants this to be corrected to discourage further trespassing.  Within Strava, the Tribe has continued to flag activities crossing the Tribe's property, and what Strava legal staff indicated was that we needed to correct or edit it with Open Street Map.  That route for the Palouse to Cascades Trail and/or previously referred to as the John Wayne Pioneer Trail is incorrect.  By leaving it, you are encouraging illegal access across private property owned by the Tribe and for that matter non-tribal owned parcels within the Reservation where that line is delineated.
pertile (2023-12-06 12:42:14+00:00): this is wrong, I will undo this changeset
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144809204
LabelMaker (2023-12-06 22:10:40+00:00): Hello pertile, my intention was to update the oneway tagging in this area based on Mapillary. Since you have made many updates to this area, I will defer to your knowledge of the road network. Please make the updates you think are necessary. Thank you and happy mapping!
pertile (2023-12-06 22:30:05+00:00): Thank you. Mapillary photos are old, they put new signs there
eggie (2023-12-06 09:58:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Warin61 (2023-12-06 21:47:19+00:00): Hi
Relation 16782872 is not closed.

Why not use the DCS Base Map as a source for this? I would think that is far better than imagery alone to determine these features.
TobyOrr (2023-12-07 22:42:29+00:00): Thanks for the feedback about the relation not closed.  The DCS Base Map is reasonable but not perfect.  I think I can do better using satellite imagery - especially as we have access to a number of imagery sources. I have visited a small part of Yanga National Park but the wettest parts are not accessible so my "on the ground" verification is based on limited experience. I think OSM can do better than the DCS Base Map but please correct me if you see errors. Thanks again.
Frans S (2023-12-27 14:24:23+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Very inaccurate (sloppy) mapped.
No buildings squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144810178
Minh Nguyen (2023-12-07 02:45:16+00:00): 'Hi, thanks for taking a look at this part of the map! In the past, we’ve gone back and forth about whether South Campus should be conjoined to the main campus somehow, but the general sentiment is that it should remain as a separate map feature. Both South Campus and the International House are still identifiable as part of SJSU based on the operator tag but aren’t really a single “site” per se. It would be more accurate to describe South Campus as a university campus than as a generic area.

I’ve undone these changes to the site relation, but please don’t let that stop you from looking around and making any improvements you see fit. We can even create a second site relation for the entrances to South Campus. 🙂 Also, SJSU is looking rather bare on OpenHistoricalMap – we could use some help remapping the buildings with start dates there. https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/relation/2705125'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144850429
VigilantPenguin (2023-12-06 00:42:08+00:00): I also moved University Place node to actually be within the borders of University Place. And (mostly as a note to self) there are some CDPs that are not on the map in Pierce County that may be worth adding as simple place nodes since they have significant populations.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-05 11:42:39+00:00): Hello!

    Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
    For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree".

    So for buildings it is not needed to put Farmland as their name.

    Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1228965181 is specifically named with such name?

    Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.

    And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
Frans S (2023-12-20 15:03:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.
Connected nodes to other features.
These comments are valid for other changesets as well.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144810594
tyfi (2023-12-06 01:24:07+00:00): These tags are frequently incorrect about MO state route alignments.
tyfi (2023-12-06 01:25:32+00:00): I also did generic cleanup stuff like move name_1 to alt_name, and I fixed a ref tag that missed a concurrency.
tyfi (2023-12-06 02:32:54+00:00): Also slightly extended Portage Open Bay since it didn't quite go under the bridge.
tyfi (2023-12-06 02:34:13+00:00): This changeset addresses notes 4016496, 4016494, 4016499, and 4016495.
tyfi (2023-12-06 02:35:38+00:00): And I added some stop signs.
phidauex (2023-12-06 19:17:53+00:00): Hi, can I ask why you are deleting so many driveways and service roads? While a few may not be valid anymore, it looks like many do exist on the ground and should remain mapped.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144811496
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-12-07 07:43:38+00:00): Bạn ơi, bạn add thẻ restriction vào mà để giá trị = 0 thế. Có gì bạn check kĩ lại nhé.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-12-07 07:54:29+00:00): Với cả bạn có hình thực địa hem á? Tại mình check hình tháng 9 2023 là hem có biển cấm gì.
kurisubrooks (2023-12-13 00:10:41+00:00): Hi there. Generally, it is only advised to add names to footpaths/sidewalks if they are specifically signposted/designated, which is uncommon for sidewalks in particular. Not that it's necessarily incorrect information to add the street name to footpaths/sidewalks; this data is easily added by data consumers detecting adjacent streets, and is not commonly tagged in Australia.
Patrickov (2023-12-27 16:27:31+00:00): Noted and thanks.  Unfortunately I just found some guy naming sidewalks nearby:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142501461
Glassman (2023-12-06 22:04:23+00:00): #TIP: Typically we either draw a polygon around the pump area/and or the building. Instead of using a descriptive name, Closed/Defunct, you can show the opening_hours=closed
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144812956
EvanSiroky (2023-12-08 05:34:12+00:00): Hey there! I'm a local mapper from Scotts Valley, California. I see that you requested a review of this changeset, so I'm giving it a review.

The changes you made seem to look good!

Happy mapping!
hatul (2024-07-31 08:53:14+00:00): שלום יצחק, בבקשה לא להוסיף שלטים שלא קיימים. גם אם אתה רוצה להוסיף מידע למטיילים, הוספת של מידע שלא קיים בשטח מבלבלת ופוגעת במפה.
citrula (2023-12-06 04:47:18+00:00): Hi, adding a node is not correct in addition to the area that you already mapped before. You must choose one or the other! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144813366
uknown-gryphus (2023-12-11 15:34:24+00:00): Hi, thank you for your edit. I noticed you have changed some roads to the "service" classification, however these are not service roads. Service only applies if the road provides access to a service, like a parking entrance, a driveway, etc. These are regular residential roads, and should be tagged as residential, *not* service
arjunaraoc (2023-12-07 00:10:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).  If your intention is to map the business, please update with relevant tags as in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144813469
Руслан19899977 (2023-12-06 04:56:21+00:00): Минивен до границы с камбоджей. 270 бат с человека. Отправление 8.00
f_husni (2025-02-12 07:16:29+00:00): hello based on this link https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521424240 you had added motorcar=no tag. if the highways can't accessed by public, better added tag with motorcar=destination or access=private. because i had checked from satelite imagery the highways still can accessed by car.
alexnder (2023-12-06 14:32:50+00:00): any reason why you removed the parking surface behind "Casa de Cultură a Sindicatelor" ?  https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/544659154
habib_amir (2023-12-10 10:39:35+00:00): Вандализм.
mavl (2023-12-10 12:34:56+00:00): @Sanho8888  
Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет несуществующую коммерческую территорию. Этот пакет правок отменён. Добавляйте, пожалуйста, на карту реальные объекты.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_practice
user_5359 (2023-12-08 07:21:03+00:00): Bitte in den Fall access=no setzen statt den Parkplatz zu löschen. Alternativ ein construction Konstrukt setzen. Sinnvoll ist immer ein note.
user_5359 (2023-12-08 07:21:42+00:00): Sorry: Natürlich auch Willkommen bei OSM!
flohoff (2023-12-07 00:09:22+00:00): Moin,
ich glaube das müsste sogar ein vehicle=destination sein - Da steht ein Z250 laut Mapillary

Flo
AndySchulte (2023-12-07 09:31:31+00:00): Moin,

hast recht. War mir nicht sicher, ob VZ 250 oder VZ 260 mit dem Zusatz Anlieger frei dort steht.

Habe es angepasst.

Gruß Andy
contrapunctus (2023-12-07 18:32:39+00:00): Hey wennlh, thank you for your contributions!

Some feedback -

1. Please try to provide more unique changeset comments, which mentions not only your intended area of editing, but also the changes you intended to make.

2. Also, please use title case for names, e.g. "Government Primary School" rather than "Government primary School". 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Uppercase_characters

Thank you and happy mapping 😃
Langlaeufer (2023-12-06 09:10:44+00:00): Sorry mein Kommentar zu sidewalk=left gehörte hier her. Der Weg ist separat erfasst. - war vorher richtig.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144817844
pyram (2023-12-13 18:43:36+00:00): Hallo realthargor,
wurde hier etwas verwechselt? Siehe 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4026475

Gruß
pyram
silversurfer83 (2023-12-07 09:14:06+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM :)

schön, dass du dich selbst um deine Firma kümmerst und dabei hast du  darum gebeten, dass sich jemand deine Änderung ansieht.

Grundsätzlich gar nicht so verkehrt. Wie üblich gibt es ein paar Kleinigkeiten, die anders gemacht werden könnten. Alles nicht dramatisch.

- Das Gebäude selbst ist ja nicht das gewerblich genutzte Gelände, sondern das gesamte eingezäunte Grundstück. Also könnten die Informationen, die Du hier eingetragen hast am besten an eine neu anzulegenden Fläche, die das Grundstück umfasst. Wie gesagt: könnte. Kann auch am Gebäude bleiben.
Die Webseite wäre noch ganz gut gewesen und, falls vorhanden, die üblichen Büro- bzw. Öffnungszeiten.

Bei Fragen, immer raus damit

Alles Gute, besonders für die Ohren
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144818084
Taksine (2023-12-06 08:06:35+00:00): 清理整除一些不规范或倒闭的店铺
Langlaeufer (2023-12-06 09:07:31+00:00): Bitte darauf achten, ob die Fußwege schon separat erfasst sind. Ist hier der Fall, deshalb war sidewalk:left=separate richtig und sidewalk=left ist falsch
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144818266
Tzu€ (2023-12-06 11:39:50+00:00): Danke, ich ziehe mich einfach  zurück aus dem Sidewalk Bereich und schaue mir nochmal an wie das geregelt ist :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144818266
Langlaeufer (2023-12-06 12:18:37+00:00): Zurückziehen sollst du dich nicht.
Bitte einfach nur darauf achten ob die Seitenwege bereits mit  separater Linie erfasst sind. Die werden in Streetcomplete auch extra hervorgehoben
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-06 08:30:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/834765359

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2023-12-07 09:18:32+00:00): Grüße nach Osnabrück :)

ein paar Fragen und Anmerkungen hätte ich:

- dieser Accountname sieht stark nach Behörde aus. Sehe ich das richtig?

- Der Weg über diese Brücke: Wie genau wird der Beschildert werden? Sprich: Welches Verkehrszeichen wird den Zugang regeln?

- Wenn ein Objekt noch nicht nutzbar ist sollten auch noch keine positiven Zugangsrechte gesetzt werden, auch wenn das ganze noch als Baustelle getaggt ist. Es gibt häufig Baustellen im Verkehr, wo zweispurige Fz nicht mehr durch dürfen (können) jedoch noch Plazt für Fußgänger ist. Dort kann mit detailliertem access entsprechend geroutet werden.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144818839
Benoît C MdP (2023-12-07 14:56:23+00:00): Bon, désolé mais l'avenue était bien nommée.
Je fais un revert.

Bonne continuation

Benoît
Iveta_vas (2024-01-08 08:26:58+00:00): Hi, thank you for your attentiveness. All is good now
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144818844
Langlaeufer (2023-12-06 09:05:25+00:00): Bis du sicher das die Braunstraße als 30er-Zone beschildert ist? Das ist doch eine Hauptstraße!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144818901
Tzu€ (2023-12-06 10:53:11+00:00): Da ist seit Monaten Baustelle. Ich wollte meine Änderung eigentlich nicht bestätigen (anfängerfehler:/)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144818901
Langlaeufer (2023-12-06 14:35:11+00:00): Mir ging es um den Unterschied 30 per Tempo 30-Zone-Schild vs. Tempo 30 per "Zulässige Höchstgeschwindigkeit"-Schild . Bei der Baustelle wird ja wohl eher das zweite zutreffen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144818901
rickmastfan67 (2023-12-06 08:31:29+00:00): See: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=154279450827345&lat=30.6707583&lng=-81.4586556&z=17&x=0.4858633597467215&y=0.5249798045355133&zoom=0&focus=photo
arjunaraoc (2023-12-17 02:57:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144819048
nevw (2023-12-07 07:53:04+00:00): Hi, this was named as a fire station.
Should it also be tagged as amenity=fire_station
m_p_13 (2023-12-07 10:57:00+00:00): The fire station has been moved to a new location since 2014/2015. In my opinion, name=old_fire_station or name=abandoned_fire_station can be used.
Amenity=fire_station is no longer justified as the fire station is no longer here.
nevw (2023-12-07 11:37:31+00:00): Ok, fine. There is a phone number listed…do you think this should also be deleted?
m_p_13 (2023-12-07 11:41:38+00:00): Yes, it should be removed.