piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2024-11-14 15:18:58+00:00): Hi :)

sieht soweit ziemlich schick aus.

Einen Hinweis hätte ich wieder für dich: In Anröchte hast du einige "Fußwege" bearbeitet oder angelegt.

Bei OSM wir die Eigenschaft "Fußweg" (highway=footway) in Deutschland so interpretiert, dass dieser Weg mit dem Verkehrszeichen 239 beschildert ist. Das schließt die Nutzung durch andere Verkehrsteilnehmer (inkl. Radfahren) aus.

Bitte setze daher Fußweg nur, wenn ein Weg rein rechtlich außschließlich für den Fußverkehr bestimmt ist.

Wenn du ein VZ239 + Rad frei findest ist es ein Fußweg mit der Eigenschaft "bicycle=yes". Hast du ein VZ240 (gemeinsamer Fuß-/Radweg) ist es ein Pfad (highway=path) mit bicycle=designated + foot=designated.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit und falls du Zeit hast schau mal im Wiki nach den Stichworten footway, cycleway und path

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159123514
literan (2024-11-15 09:58:43+00:00): вы тут слегка наванадалили, сломали огромный мультиполигон леса. Аккуратнее, пожалуйста
eggie (2024-11-14 10:47:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Helaas niet volgens de 'mappingrules' van OSM. Ik heb de adresnode teruggeplaatst.
Een oprit gemaakt.. dus het adres is nu vindbaar in de navigatie. 
website en sportschool toegevoegd.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-11-14 13:12:21+00:00): Navigatie werkt zodra de verschillende routingapps hun update hebben gehad.
Mvg
eggie
cuzi (2024-11-14 11:46:15+00:00): Es wäre besser ein "fixme"-tag zu setzen z.B. "fixme=Position überprüfen" und/oder auf der Karte einen Hinweis zu eröffnen.

Die Kommentare im Changeset werden eher selten gelesen, ich bin auch nur durch Zufall darauf gestoßen.
bxl-forever_repair (2024-11-14 12:32:50+00:00): Fixed by changeset 159128335 to restore house+shed but with the correct geometry.

Buildings should never be traced on aerial imagery, please use Digitaal Vlaanderen GRB basemap.
Jo-JoN (2024-11-14 11:04:52+00:00): Loan-Mode, Eingang

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159125114
zuicz (2025-02-01 21:29:23+00:00): Chyba już jest gotowy?
adas (2025-02-01 22:45:02+00:00): Gotowy.
https://skidolina.pl/n-pierwszy-weekend-za-nami.html
dpolovinkin (2025-05-24 12:33:33+00:00): а тут строительство чего именно? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1333700785
Константин Гам (2025-05-24 14:08:30+00:00): Если я не внёс название, значит либо таблички не было, либо не было возможности зафиксировать. В ноябре, я тут обкатывал местность в шторм с ледяным дождём, если память не изменяет
AndersAndersson (2024-11-15 06:31:02+00:00): Finns det ingen stig som korsar järnvägen?
AndersAndersson (2024-11-27 12:14:43+00:00): Två olika källor pekar på att det finns en stig och användaren svarar inte. Jag har lagt tillbaka stigen.
Jerry_W2k (2024-11-15 06:06:05+00:00): Uuu, dzięki za naprawy relacji linii autobusowych!
Marek-M (2024-11-15 12:45:25+00:00): Spoczko, z Relatify fajnie się je edytuje :)
RaphaelPasloin (2024-11-15 02:53:13+00:00): Bonjour,

Il y a quelques soucis avec cette édition : 

- Vous avez supprimé le passage piéton (footway=crossing) qui reliait les trottoirs à la Rue du Merlo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/766629167 ce n'est pas une correction mais une régression dans le graph de routing.

Idem avec le connecteur Rue Jean d'Osta : https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/523419097

- Vous avez supprimé deux petits "bâtiments" comme celui ci https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237005496/history qui sont probablement une ventilation "haute" de  la dalle de parking, on peut considérer qu'ils n'ont pas leur place dans OSM en tant que building mais ceux ci ont une ref:UrbIS et sont bien présent dans l'imagerie numérique ; merci de ne jamais effacer de tels objects, ont peut leur indiquer un status spécial comme : not:building=yes mais certainement pas les supprimer.

- Le nom du bâtiment est incorrect et pris d'une source non autorisé https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google ce qui est clairement une violation du droit d’auteur et par ailleurs factuellement faux ( j'ai entre-temps  fait  retiré l'entrée par la Gafam). Merci d'utiliser des sources fiables et autorisées à l'avenir. 

Une belle journée,
Raphaël
ÔMan (2024-11-15 07:51:50+00:00): Vraiment désolé pour ces désagréments. Je vais relire le règlement de mapping OSM Européen pour ne plus reproduire ces erreurs dans le futur.
Nadjita (2025-06-06 16:36:44+00:00): Ich finde den Namen „Kriegerdenkmal“ unpassend, weil das nicht der Name der Skulptur ist, sondern nur beschreibt, was mit memorial=war_memorial schon ausgedrückt wird. Allerdings ist es ohne die Namensliste kein Denkmal mehr, sondern eigentlich nur noch eine Skulptur. Von daher würde ich die Denkmal-Sachen mit entsprechendem Lifecycle-Prefix versehen und die eigentliche Statue als tourism=artwork + artwork=statue erfassen, meinetwegen noch mit name=Arbeiterstatue, aber eben nicht „Kriegerdenkmal“.
Rodrigo Rega (2024-11-22 21:01:20+00:00): Por favor, ten en cuenta que hay que procurar editar en vez de eliminar y volver a crear. De este modo se evita el perder el historial de los elementos que se han borrado, respetando así el trabajo de los anteriores editores. Gracias por tus aportes a OpenStreetMap. Un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159127234
Nakaner-repair (2024-11-14 13:01:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159129439 where the changeset comment is: Delete spam entries. We do only exists what exists on the ground.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 00:59:45+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164747018
rempshaener (2024-11-14 19:41:05+00:00): Hallo,
du hast um einen Review gebeten (in diesem und anderen Changesets). Was genau hättest du denn gerne geprüft?
Das frage ich sonst nicht - du bist aber schließlich Profi :-)
Viele Grüße
eggie (2024-11-14 13:14:18+00:00): Dag Toel.. tip.. tag bij op de bestaande adresnode.
Mvg

eggie
eggie (2024-11-14 14:09:25+00:00): Roel, De info heb ik samengevoegd en de format van de openingstijden aangepast aan OSM.
MVG
eggie
roel1955 (2024-11-14 15:50:18+00:00): Dankje eggie , volgende keer gaat het misschien in een keer goed. Gr Roel
5m4u9 (2024-11-15 04:42:00+00:00): Hi, this road that you have restored is at least tertiary because it connects Duran Castro street with the Karachipampa area.
AzuisRiver (2024-11-20 12:32:52+00:00): Hello 5m4u9, thank you for reaching out. I agree that the classification of these highways could be unified to tertiary and would make it more consistent through the Karachipampa area. I can update the highways through https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/835195847-https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498840126 to tertiary thank you for your time.
impiaaa (2024-11-14 18:23:15+00:00): Street names in OpenStreetMap must not be abbreviated. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations
Maksim Sazanovich (2024-11-15 11:37:14+00:00): Hello! Thanks for your feedback. I'll make corrections of this tagging and will make such edits more carefully
rempshaener (2024-11-14 18:31:13+00:00): Hallo,

so ganz passt es noch nicht – das wird aber.

Jetzt sind es zwei Einträge (Hinweis auf den Unterstrich):

highway=street_lamp
razed:highway=streetlamp

Das „razed:highway=streetlamp“ muss raus.
Bei „highway=street_lamp“ noch das „razed:“ davor.

Das wars.

Viele Grüße
Erik - (2024-11-14 19:22:47+00:00): Danke sehr für die Korrigierung. Ich hatte es jetzt als: "razed:highway=street_lamp" umgeändert.
woodpeck (2024-11-14 14:54:58+00:00): You have deleted more than 50 objects in this changeset. Can you explain why? This link shows the deleted objects https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=159128734 - please explain your reasons, otherwise I will have to revert this and similar edits.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-02-23 04:58:40+00:00): DWG revert - incorrect deletions & poor quality

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162838899
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-16 18:12:58+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12339320208/history has shop = materials that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=materials ? What kind of materials? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for possible values - though maybe new one is needed)
bxl-forever (2024-11-14 12:51:51+00:00): SVP ne pas remplacer le bâtiment par une boulangerie. Next time: mettre un point flottant pour y indiquer la boulangerie à l’intérieur du bâtiment, merci.
Nous corrigeons.
ÔMan (2024-11-14 12:54:13+00:00): Effectivement ça me semble plus correct, j'ai hésité à le faire mais j'ai pris la mauvaise décision.
Merci pour la correction.
BCNorwich (2024-11-16 08:47:39+00:00): I've deleted the following highways as they duplicated existing highways thus probably disrupting routing. I think all relations are maintained.

Way: 1333719652
Way: 1333719651
Way: 1333719650
Way: 1333719649
Way: 1333719648
Way: 1333719647
Way: 1333719646
Way: 1333719645
Way: 1333719644
Way: 1333719643
Way: 1333719642
Way: 1333719641
Way: 1333719640
Way: 1333719639
Way: 1333719638
Way: 1333719637
Way: 1333719636
Way: 1333719635
Way: 1333719634

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2024-11-16 15:10:30+00:00): More duplicated ways as above comment.

Way: 1333719628
Way: 1333719629
Way: 1333719630
Way: 1333719633
Way: 1333719631
Way: 1333719627
Rodrigo Rega (2024-11-22 21:03:26+00:00): Por favor, ten en cuenta que hay que procurar editar en vez de eliminar y volver a crear. De este modo se evita el perder el historial de los elementos que se han borrado, respetando así el trabajo de los anteriores editores. Gracias por tus aportes a OpenStreetMap. Un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159129308
grelus (2025-02-03 19:50:08+00:00): Tą edycją wprowadziłeś jednokierunkowy ruch na drodze wojewódzkiej 152 w Świdwinie. W ten sposób wiele nawigacji prowadząc przez Świdwin głupieje. Popraw proszę ten błąd, a w przyszłości przykładaj większą uwagę do edycji podstawowej sieci drogowej. Najlepiej zacząć naukę edycji danych OSM od mniej wrażliwych danych.
wozder (2025-02-03 19:59:53+00:00): ok. będę uważał. dzięki
Nakaner-repair (2024-11-14 13:01:21+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 159127259, 159127662.
rumbrummer (2025-04-22 07:26:57+00:00): Hi, laut Kurviger Forum ist die Straße noch in Bau:
https://forum.kurviger.com/t/baustelle-in-osm-wird-aber-nicht-in-kurviger-angezeigt/21481
-> ich würde sie als "construction" taggen.
Warum hast Du sie zurückgedreht?
conradoos (2025-02-26 21:35:57+00:00): I reverted the changeset, because you duplicated buildings.
rene78 (2024-11-19 17:38:43+00:00): Hi Skv gowda,

something went wrong here. The Palm went missing. Can you double-check, please?

Thanks!
Rene
UnitedEscape (2024-11-14 14:08:10+00:00): Correction: The path is near Niityaron urheilukeskus, not Heinäpään urheilukeskus.
VictorIE (2026-04-30 11:19:24+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60829455

If this is highway=secondary, what is the ref?
LateNightTone (2026-04-30 14:01:05+00:00): I didn't set it as secondary myself... but I've gone with the description on Sabre that all of this stretch (former A5) is continuation of the B84.
Leo Slager (2024-11-15 22:52:32+00:00): Met deze changeset is de Grote Poel bij Aalsmeer compleet leeg gelopen.
Zie ook:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=159131692

En de fouten:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=4.70516&lat=52.24449&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=long_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way%2Clong_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Ikzie mij dus genoodzaakt om deze changeset te reverten.
Leo Slager (2024-11-15 22:55:30+00:00): Als je als beginner niet weet wat je aan het doen bent, kun je er beter afblijven.
Je vernielt hier nu zoveel aan aan elkaar gekleefde ways, dat de schade nauwelijks te herstellen is !!
spughetti_tomtom (2024-11-21 14:48:38+00:00): Hey Leo,

Ik heb hier inderdaad een fout gemaakt, mijn excuses. En bedankt voor het reverten van de changeset.

Mvg,
Erica
Greg_Rose (2025-01-08 19:46:05+00:00): Hey fellow Africa mapper!
2 things: Please don't convert unclassified through roads to "track", that makes them non-routable for most downstream apps.
If the road doesn't connect with any others then it's fine to convert to track.
Second, don't put a layer -1 on an entire stretch of road unless it's in a tunnel. Even though id urges you to do it, it fixes intersection errors by introducing a new error.
Questions gladly answered - happy mapping!
dval (2024-11-15 03:46:40+00:00): Hi, Mir76! Загляните в Лесной. Вот где поля для правок и по форме, и по сути.
totera (2024-11-14 17:03:53+00:00): Ciao RivalgoAV, la costruzione non è ancora iniziata (progettazione esecutiva e realizzazione sono state aggiudicate un mese fa: https://www.rfi.it/content/rfi/it/news-e-media/comunicati-stampa-e-news/2024/10/15/gruppo-fs---linea-orte-falconara--rfi-aggiudica-i-lavori-di-radd.html)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-11 16:56:54+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12339421585/history has amenity = convenience that was added in this edit
What was meant by amenity=convenience? Is it a convenience shop? Then shop=convenience is likely a better tagging, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=convenience .
BCNorwich (2024-11-16 15:15:21+00:00): Duplicated highways removed.
Way: 1333734915
Way: 1333734916
Way: 1333589282
olo81 (2025-12-25 16:25:59+00:00): ?
phone=Niepubliczne Przedszkole i Żłobek Jezioraczek 3
stasiu512 (2024-11-18 22:57:09+00:00): Cześć, jeśli faktycznie jest to droga jednokierunkowa to czy na tym odcinku dopuszczony jest dwukierunkowy ruch rowerowy (kontraruch)?
Artur | Yanosik (2024-11-19 07:07:14+00:00): Cześć, nie znalazłem informacji na temat ruchu rowerowego w tym miejscu
Filip009 (2024-11-15 10:33:37+00:00): Zdravím, mohli by ste prosím písať lepšie popisy sady zmien? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn
Mxdanger (2024-11-15 03:56:25+00:00): I'm not sure if its different where you live but here the standard for three way T intersections is not the "pencil-tip" style. I've changed it here: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159153679
SekeRob repair (2024-11-15 08:19:51+00:00): Hi Ludovico

I've made some changes of your 'named' natural areas to boundary since they were overlapping/crossing previously mapped areas in detail (can't do that). Also your 'named' areas have overlaps and gaps themselves,  I've resolved the overlaps by best guess. The task is up to you to fill in the natural areas exact and detailed following the previously mapped zones. I've added a few rock, scree, wood zones and a nameless stream of which the details you can find in this change set https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159158982

Question: What are the sources for these 'named' zones, found 9, some of them flagged because of the mentioned overlaps with previously mapped landcover details.

If you have questions, let me know

happy mapping.

SekeRob
LuRe84 (2024-11-16 03:35:51+00:00): Thank you for the information. I have sent you two private messages.
BCNorwich (2024-11-14 14:57:22+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You can square buildings up in the iD editor, shortcut Q. They'll look much neater.

Regards Bernard.
CurlingMan13 (2024-11-14 22:14:49+00:00): I have no choice but to again revert this changeset.  You removed features that did exist and were verified, such as:

You also readded a business that no longer exists and was properly removed.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5405662903

This feature was expanded in detail from node to an area and the no longer existing railway was removed as per OSM guidelines that only what currently exists should be mapped:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3689959332

The area of this parking lot was correct until you reverted it:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/143516497

These features no longer exist with absolutely no trace as they have been completely overbuilt by new buildings or new features that would require complete excavation of whatever may have been there before:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18061238
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1145709152
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1145709158
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/858360088
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/858360087
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1005601387
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1005601389
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1005601388
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/862434339

These features were updated to reflect that part of the railway was indoors, yet you removed this bit of detail by carelessly reverting:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125706145
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125706151
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125706138
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125706148
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125706143
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125706135

Again, I ask you to stop reverting en masse.  This is a community with a simple guideline, map only what is on the ground and can be verified.  Features that no longer exist do not belong on OSM.  You are causing damage to the map and data and I have already asked you to stop but was met with antagonism and hostility via your profile page.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nonexistent_features

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159148496
SomeoneElse (2024-11-28 12:19:16+00:00): @RedSkies please do reply to the above comment.
aTarom (2024-11-14 16:58:27+00:00): Hola, bienvenido a OSM, estas etiquetas:
> Evaluation_report (levels)
> Evaluation _Report (levels)
> Evaluation_Report (levels)
qué funcionalidad tienen? se han quedado por error?
En los foros de la comunidad podemos ayudarte con cualquier duda en los primeros pasos
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51
saludos
Pablo Caño (2024-11-19 17:12:52+00:00): Hola, responden a la Informe de Evaluación, información disponible en el mapa de la Administración Electrónica de Navarra
syntex (2024-11-14 15:28:41+00:00): *only Bing and ESRI Imagery used
VLD549 (2024-11-26 18:23:36+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes.  I don't want to question your language skills, but it seems to me that ' zuring' in Dutch, zucchini in English, and Yacon in French are not the same at all. Is there something I am missing?
Thank you!
elucci (2024-11-27 10:25:26+00:00): Hi VLD549! Don't worry, no offence taken. I was actually a bit perplexed too over the multi-language name of the board until I figured out that as they used a A to Z pattern, every language has different plant/vegetable at the end of its alphabetical list. I hope this clarifies.
Thanks for checking and have a nice mapping!
VLD549 (2024-12-13 12:06:44+00:00): :) Thanks!
Temat-Droga (2024-11-14 15:18:09+00:00): Warto dodać że droga ma większy ruch niż S3 na północ od węzła Głogów Południe i DK12 na odcinku Głogów-Węzeł Głogów Zachód.
Temat-Droga (2024-11-14 15:18:23+00:00): (i DK12 ogólnie w stronę zachodnią)
ALu68 (2024-11-16 07:57:22+00:00): Hallo FreakyMondayn8,

wenn du den access-Key anwendest, dann musst du aber den highway-Key beibehalten.

Schau dir die History der Wege an:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313014277/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313014278/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017862799/history

Gruß.
syntex (2024-11-14 15:28:47+00:00): *only Bing and ESRI Imagery used
sabas88 (2024-11-18 11:09:03+00:00): Why did you remove the straightened pier? See this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=doLmFWpYg-w
Can you please fix it? Thanks!
syntex (2024-11-18 11:50:59+00:00): Oh, I thought the construction is already finished because the construction area was added in 2021. It looks like it started relatively recently. Sorry about that, I've restored the construction areas in changeset 159279929.
sabas88 (2024-11-18 12:08:19+00:00): Thanks!
Supaplex (2024-11-15 03:28:34+00:00): 有人行道接到地底的地下電纜了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193327371
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159135718
eggie (2024-11-14 16:56:32+00:00): Dag Guus...
Waarom heb je  de adresnode buiten het gebouw geplaatst?

Mvg
eggie
eggie (2024-11-14 17:30:39+00:00): Adresnode teruggeplaatst
Yunkers (2024-11-14 16:36:11+00:00): Możesz dać linka do dyskusji na forum na ten temat?
SpinOff (2024-11-14 22:05:58+00:00): Na odcinku Kock-Moszczanka musi być primary, żeby wyróżnić ją względem DW809. Dyskutuj te zmiany na forum, bo to się zwyczajnie nadaje do revertu.
Temat-Droga (2024-11-15 14:12:09+00:00): W takim wypadku DW809 nie powinna być secondary,
SpinOff (2024-11-15 16:35:53+00:00): W takim razie Twój zestaw zmian jest niekompletny i revert poleciał słusznie.
ramthelinefeed (2024-11-25 09:18:07+00:00): Ooops, looks like you speedlimit fixes have inadvertantly broken the route relation for the No.234 Goldliner bus? - see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=-6.68065&lat=55.11159&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
LateNightTone (2024-11-25 09:48:23+00:00): Oops indeed! My bad, thanks for spotting 😊

I must have been splitting ways at the roundabout while I was at it, left out the step of adding relations back in. Fixed now.
dval (2024-11-15 03:25:13+00:00): Hi, RRIbarruri! Южнее ул. Мамина-Сибиряка вы нарисовали домики. При этом их линии пересекаются с линией жилой зоны (landuse=residential). Этого не следует допускать.
RRIbarruri (2024-11-15 08:46:01+00:00): Эту претензию скорее стоит адресовать тому, кто криво отрисовал жилую зону.
dval (2024-11-15 09:11:58+00:00): Кто последний рисовал, с того и спрос.
RRIbarruri (2024-11-15 09:51:15+00:00): Избавьте меня от глупостей, пожалуйста. residential я не рисовал, максимум подвинул там, где совсем дичь была. Мне это не интересно
Supaplex (2024-11-15 03:27:22+00:00): It should be changed to Paiwan language code, not Deutsch
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159137351
habi (2025-04-23 12:15:59+00:00): Ciao Defikarte
Hier hast du die Öffnungszeiten als 24/7 erfasst, und Operator als "Mo-Fr 07:30-17:00", was so wenig Sinn macht.
Ich nehme an, dass Prodega der Operator sein sollte.
Gruss,
Habi
chnuessli (2025-04-23 13:37:30+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur
Masyas (2024-11-21 03:29:17+00:00): 德胜河船闸已改建完成，勿添加过时信息
tux67 (2024-11-16 10:43:04+00:00): Hi Pascal1909,
du hattest in deinem Change diesen Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1333768770 von path auf service geändert. Inwieweit bist du sicher, das der Weg in seiner gesamten Länge mit dem KfZ befahrbar ist? Oder gibt es irgendwelche Restriktionen (ganz oder für einen Teil)?
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159138255
Pawe1909 (2024-11-16 12:16:25+00:00): Hallo tux67,
danke für deinen Kommentar.
Dieser Weg (frühere Bahnlinie) wurde vor kurzem ausgebaut und in diesem Zuge geteert sowie verbreitert, und ist somit ohne weiteres mit einem Kfz befahrbar. Eine Durchfahrtbeschränkung liegt hier nicht vor. 
Liebe Grüße
Pascal
silversurfer83 (2024-11-14 17:08:12+00:00): Weg in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159138978 wieder hergestellt.

Vorhandene valide Daten sind nicht zu löschen!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159138291
BCNorwich (2024-11-16 08:03:55+00:00): Hi, I've removed duplicated sections of highways at the bridges. Also amended to way to be one with the old railway.

Regards Bernard.
SomeoneElse (2024-11-19 10:45:52+00:00): @DodoTheDev Thanks for tidying this up.  I've removed a bit more of the duplication to the west and also joined up a gap there - http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=151858&noCache=true&_noCache=on