piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_8655426 (2025-05-22 09:46:50+00:00): こんにちは。
数名のかたがチェンジセット・ディスカッションで、hatochanさんのマッピングの問題点を指摘したり、改善方法を提案されたりしています。しかし、編集内容に改善が見られません。(タグのないウェイ・エリア、歩道の未接続。)

他のユーザーからのメッセージに応答しないマッパーは、ブロックの対象となっています。

Changeset Discussions
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Changeset_Discussions

JA:Data working group
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Data_working_group

チェンジセット・ディスカッションのご確認をお願いします。
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=38591
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166602372
hatochan (2025-05-24 22:12:39+00:00): こちらでディスカッションされていることを知らずにおりました。Bingをベースに描いています。大山かなめさんにも個別にメッセージをお送りしましたが、Bingで確実に繋がっているところはつなげていますが、確認できない歩道はそのままにしています。市町村によりますが、あきらかに歩道と認識できずに白線のみで道端を区切ったところもあり、crossingとつなぐかどうかも確認できるところはつなげていますが、できないものはつないでいません。そのときは主道路をcrossing=markedで対応しています。これがつながっていると確認できるものは修正していただきたいです。
user_8655426 (2025-05-25 01:01:56+00:00): こんにちは。
歩道の接続については、別の変更セットで他のマッパーさんたちが説明されていますが、以下のページも参考になるかと思います。

JA:歩道/SidewalkMapping
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:歩道/SidewalkMapping

タグのないウェイ・エリアについてですが、これは私もかなりやらかしています。しかしJOSM がアップロード前に警告してくれるので、とても助かっています。一度JOSMの Validator の設定を見直してみてはいかがでしょうか？ 

JA:JOSM/Validator
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:JOSM/Validator

Happy Mapping!
hatochan (2025-05-25 01:23:01+00:00): 情報ありがとうございます。
これはうまく整理されてますね。

欧米は馬車と人を早くから分離して歩道という概念がしっかりありますが、日本は畦道から徐々に広がったので、そもそも歩道の考え方が欧米とは違うんだろうなぁと思っているところです。

地図を描いてて、文化論まで広がるなんてOpenStreetMap素敵！
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:57:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
eggie (2025-05-24 12:29:39+00:00): Dag  wvdp   Wanneer je gewoon water op landuse intekent dan dzie je vervolgens alles door elkaar.
Wellicht kun je het voortaan uitsnijden?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-24 12:33:35+00:00): De paden die nu door het water lopen heb ik verlegd en of van een bruggetjes voorzien.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
wavexx (2025-06-16 10:09:34+00:00): Does this lane already exists? Is this lane restricted to bus only?
Tiziano_Bz (2025-06-16 14:28:12+00:00): Si esiste già ed è stata fatta solo per essere utilizzata dai BUS del servizio di trasporto pubblico locale
wavexx (2025-06-16 15:31:46+00:00): In tal caso, non bisognerebbe mettere access=no + bus=designed?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bus%3Ddesignated

questo evita che il calcolo percorso prenda questa via anche per macchine/etc.
Tiziano_Bz (2025-06-17 07:36:22+00:00): Buongiorno, si hai ragione ho modificato e mi scuso per l'errore.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
Davidos64 (2025-05-22 15:48:45+00:00): Oops, thanks !
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:57:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
user_5359 (2025-05-23 11:33:42+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/751239168. What is the mean of the tag Kotulo - Leheley Road = Borji garas-Kutulo Road?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:57:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
Lezurex (2025-05-22 20:30:16+00:00): Woher hast du diese Hausnummern? Ich bezweifle stark, dass die vor Ort so ausgeschildert sind. Im GWR sind sie zwar so eingetragen, aber jene mit Nachkommastelle sind keine "echten" Hausnummern, sondern bezeichnen ein Teilgebäude einer Hausnummer. Das ist ein wichtiger unterschied zwischen 1.1, 1.2, ... und 1a, 1b, ...
fabian_i (2025-05-23 04:52:42+00:00): Danke für deinen Hinweis.
Ich habe den Index bereits wieder aus der Adresse entfernt.
373838484 (2026-06-24 14:22:36+00:00): I don't suppose anybody knows why this fence was constructed blocking the ability to go through?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:57:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
Taya_S (2025-05-22 11:46:55+00:00): Reverted SEO spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166609151
Taya_S (2025-05-22 12:04:52+00:00): Removed SEO spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166609991
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:57:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
ivanbranco (2025-05-22 13:29:53+00:00): Ciao lapianta, attenzione. Hai trasformato un'intera strada in un cancello: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/200256876
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:57:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-22 11:23:46+00:00): zmiany istotnych kategorii dróg trzeba przedyskutować na forum + używaj swojego zwykłego konta, proszę

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166608099
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-05-27 02:48:57+00:00): Hello. Please do not change road names solely based on TIGER data, as it is known to be inaccurate. Furthermore, there is no "North Grand Central Parkway," so there is no need to disambiguate here. Thank you.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166803741
Allison P (2025-05-27 03:12:36+00:00): The predirectional should be used if reported by county GIS. In this case, South Grand Central Parkway is correct.
Allison P (2025-05-27 03:14:48+00:00): Note that predirectionals are used for purposes other than disambiguation. In this case, for wayfinding.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-05-27 03:25:52+00:00): What do you mean? "In this case, for wayfinding?" Like I said, there is no "North Grand Central Parkway," so what's the point of that?
Allison P (2025-05-27 04:45:32+00:00): It indicates both the direction of the road and its location relative to the address grid. Combined with the address you can determine a lot about the location.

Take it up with the fire department, as that's ultimately the decisive force in many naming decisions.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-05-27 06:29:54+00:00): Interesting. I will say that this does come in handy for its northern terminus, as it's oriented west–east and gets renamed to West Ogden Avenue. Is this what you mean by "wayfinding" and "the direction of the road and its location relative to the address grid"?
NikitaSalt (2025-05-28 06:58:30+00:00): Hello! Thanks for the information, I'll take it into consideration.
fortera_au (2025-05-22 23:48:50+00:00): Hi, just wondering if there's a reason why some roads have been split into so many individual sections? It's not obvious from a quick look, and if there's no tagging difference or splits needed to make a relation work, it's better to leave it as one longer section.
sammypanda (2025-05-23 00:55:28+00:00): @fortera_au oh! no, im not as familiar with all this. I was just clicking the road as needed to fully compose the route. I assumed they were split up like that because [each decision point or point where a restriction applied] meant stopping the current road; like a big network of edges (graph theory). I also didn't know whether it was okay when selecting a long run of road if the platform/stop was in the middle, start or end of the segment.

Now that u point it out, maybe it means these were automatically imported from an external source. Sorry i can't help, i have no idea >< i hope i didn't do the selections wrong. 😓
fortera_au (2025-05-23 01:16:32+00:00): Ahh I've just realised you were using relatify, that might be why it was doing that! I might report that upstream.

Usually I've just used JOSM for PT routes, but it's a bit more complex of course.
sammypanda (2025-05-23 01:52:08+00:00): @fortera_au I used the OSM web editor to start the relation but i immediately noticed a mistake i did with a roundabout that Relatify helped me notice. Maybe JOSM would mean better results than both, but it looks very intimidating ;-;

If i don't use JOSM should i wait until the Relatify thing is fixed before adding any other routes?
fortera_au (2025-05-23 01:58:23+00:00): It's not the end of the world really, someone might come along afterwards and merge some of them back together but that shouldn't be a problem.

If you're interested in doing more OSM editing then learning JOSM is definitely worth a try!
eygenta (2025-07-05 16:27:15+00:00): i tak widocznie się ze mną zgodzili XD
bartgron (2025-07-05 18:58:34+00:00): Ale na tamten moment wynik dyskusji nie był znany więc zmiana była nieprzedyskutowana i dobrze że została wycofana
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:57:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:57:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:57:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:57:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
eggie (2025-05-22 11:17:53+00:00): Tip....   Gebouwen worden periodiek geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG.
Dan komen de juiste gegevens mee en alles is precies ingemeten.
Ik heb het nu uitgelijnd met de BGT.
Dakranden tellen niet mee.
MVG
eggie
ivanbranco (2025-05-22 13:33:17+00:00): Anche qua hai trasformato una strada in un cancello: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533597504
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
NeisBot (2025-05-23 07:56:10+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-05-23 08:09:08+00:00): Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166624027
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
user_5359 (2025-05-23 12:12:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/12855139493. What ist the mean of the tag gedung = Fakultas Geografi UGM?
NeisBot (2025-05-23 07:56:12+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-05-23 08:08:50+00:00): Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166623954
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
eggie (2025-05-22 10:48:44+00:00): Dag Mik... Wanneer hier een schotbalkstuw ligt is dan de geografische naam ook Schotbalkstuw.
Heeft die een naam?
... of is het een schotbalk stuw..  Dan dus niet name=....  gebruiken. Evt wel description=..
We taggen dus ook niet name=voetpad name=bankje .. name=fietspad

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-22 11:02:59+00:00): Wanneer iets een stuw is dan is de tag waterway=weir
Daarachter zal een duiker lopen ..tot het volgende open water.
waterway=drain
tunnel=culvert
layer=-1
Gr eggie
MikjeUitBrabant (2025-05-22 12:40:29+00:00): Aha. Ok.
Zal m'n best doen
eggie (2025-05-22 13:51:36+00:00): Hoi... Als voorbeeld de duiker ingetekend. Mocht er geen duiker zijn dan gewoon weghalen.
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
NeisReview (2025-05-22 10:30:27+00:00): #DataImport

Hi, welcome to OSM!

With this changeset, you've added a significant number of features that appear to share similarities in their tags. Could you please let us know more about the source of your mapping activity? Is this a data import?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks!
sovereign_linhktg (2025-05-22 11:53:46+00:00): I did it manually, one by one. Is there any issue with my changeset? 

Thank you!
NeisReview (2025-05-23 05:36:34+00:00): Thanks for your answer.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:57:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:57:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:57:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:57:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
Taya_S (2025-05-22 12:06:15+00:00): Removed SEO spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166610051
tux67 (2025-05-22 12:12:41+00:00): Also hier waren (2022) mal 2 "Bänke" 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1731617357209422&focus=photo
(die 2. bei der Infotafel) auf jeden Fall ist die die noch gemappt ist viel zu weit vom Weg. Wie siehts denn jetzt da aus? Infotafel noch da?
xoladone25 (2025-05-22 13:46:03+00:00): Die Infotafel ist noch da.
tux67 (2025-05-22 13:50:22+00:00): und die eine Bank, die du nicht gelöscht hast?
tux67 (2025-05-22 14:49:11+00:00): Ist die neben der Infotafel noch da oder die andere auf den Mapillary Bildern?
xoladone25 (2025-05-22 14:56:15+00:00): Die neben der Info-Tafel ist da. Nicht sehr schön und gerade sehr zugewachsen, aber vorhanden.
tux67 (2025-05-22 15:02:49+00:00): ok, dann hab ich die Tafel mal eingetragen und die Bank von der Wiese an den Weg verfrachtet ;-)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:57:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
eggie (2025-05-22 11:08:41+00:00): Beste Joris.. Het gebied van je edits is veel te groot.
Al eerder opgemerkt.
Ook verplaats je weer (onbewust) een adresnode
addr:city	Udenhout	Udenhout
addr:housenumber	39	39
addr:postcode	5071EA	5071EA
addr:street	Groenstraat	Groenstraat
leisure	swimming_pool	swimming_pool
name	Groene Wellen	Groene Wellen
Ik heb het adres teruggeplaatst.
Je edits zijn niet goed te controleren zo. Beperk je gebied tot bv een straat. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-22 11:12:45+00:00): Wat bedoel je met Tilburg in je commentaar.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:comment
Tilburg zegt helemaal niemand iets.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:56:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166606930 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18264 and links from there
FahrradstadtAachen (2025-05-23 16:31:34+00:00): Hello, only left turns are allowed at this intersection; right turns are not allowed (except for bicycles). Can you please explain your edit and revert it? Thank you
syntex (2025-05-22 20:05:58+00:00): Dlaczego dodałeś tą drogę (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1388747046) jako most?
meeck (2025-05-23 06:00:06+00:00): Możliwe, że nie zauważyłem, że całą drogę edytor ustawił jako most - na pewno była informacja o kolizji z Perełką którą zatwierdziłem i wyglądało jakby most został dodany tylko w miejscu kolizji.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-22 10:57:28+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 166601400, 166601417, 166601442, 166601456, 166601489, 166601542, 166601569, 166601609, 166601631, 166601668, 166601707, 166601739, 166601760, 166601769, 166601795, 166601818, 166601852, 166601871, 166601902, 166601951, 166601973, 166602016, 166602031, 166602040, 166602055, 166602070, 166602085, 166602112, 166602129, 166602144, 166602154, 166602171, 166602185, 166602208, 166602226, 166602243, 166602259, 166602278, 166602288, 166602296, 166602326, 166602341, 166602478, 166602510, 166602544, 166602562, 166602571, 166602583, 166602599, 166602610, 166602624, 166602683, 166602858, 166602880, 166602895, 166602907, 166602919, 166602943, 166603384, 166603407, 166603463, 166603491, 166603622, 166603716, 166603732, 166603770, 166603834, 166604124, 166604156, 166604175, 166604298, 166604314, 166604325, 166604344, 166604357, 166604378, 166604397, 166604416, 166604431, 166604444, 166604497, 166604515, 166604531, 166604544, 166604554, 166604841, 166604853, 166604879, 166604897, 166604906, 166604918, 166604985, 166605022, 166605048, 166605087, 166605182, 166605250, 166605282, 166605292, 166605334, 166605357, 166605380, 166605399, 166605421, 166605438, 166605462, 166605499, 166605563, 166605599, 166605622, 166605657, 166605693, 166605748, 166605804, 166605826, 166605855, 166605868, 166605892, 166605909, 166605937, 166605958, 166605982, 166605994, 166606044, 166606059, 166606091, 166606118, 166606144, 166606167, 166606196, 166606216, 166606248, 166606270, 166606307, 166606469, 166606499, 166606536, 166606554, 166606599, 166606621, 166606641, 166606660, 166606672.
eggie (2025-05-22 11:15:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Meestal hebben dit soort speeltuintjes geen naam.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
WouterKers (2025-05-22 11:20:40+00:00): Bedankt, ik heb hier inderdaad maar gewoon de straatnaam gepakt. Zal het veld leeg laten tenzij het echt een lokale naam heeft!
eggie (2025-05-22 11:24:49+00:00): Yep   .. up to you... Soms heeft iets in de buurt wel een naam... en dan kun je loc_name=...  gebruiken. 

Mapse,
eggie