piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:52+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 143182134, 143182135, 143182353, 143182359, 143182361, 143182363, 143182368, 143182369, 143182372, 143182373, 143182376, 143182378, 143182381, 143182382, 143182386, 143182389, 143182394, 143182398, 143182399, 143182402, 143182403, 143182404, 143182407, 143182412, 143182414, 143182417, 143182418, 143182420, 143182425, 143182427, 143182428, 143182433, 143182434, 143182435, 143182437, 143182439, 143182444, 143182445, 143182446, 143182450, 143182451, 143182455, 143182456, 143182458, 143182459, 143182460, 143182465, 143182466, 143182468, 143182470, 143182471, 143182476, 143182479, 143182480, 143182484, 143182486, 143182492, 143182494, 143182501, 143182502, 143182505, 143182507, 143182511, 143182514, 143182515, 143182522, 143182531, 143182535, 143182537, 143182543, 143182544, 143182549, 143182550, 143182556, 143182557, 143182561, 143182562, 143182566, 143182569, 143182570, 143182584, 143182590, 143182593, 143182595, 143182598, 143182604, 143182605, 143182607, 143182609, 143184948, 143184949, 143184950, 143184951, 143184952, 143184954, 143184955, 143184956, 143184957, 143184958, 143184959, 143184960, 143184962, 143184963, 143184964, 143184965, 143184966, 143184967, 143184968, 143184969, 143184971, 143184972, 143184973, 143184974, 143184975, 143184976, 143184977, 143184978, 143184979, 143184981, 143184984, 143184985, 143184986, 143184987, 143184988, 143184989, 143184992, 143184993, 143184994, 143184995, 143184997, 143184998, 143184999, 143185000, 143185001, 143185002, 143185003, 143185004, 143185005, 143185006, 143185007, 143185008, 143185009, 143185010, 143185011, 143185012, 143185013, 143185014, 143185015, 143185016, 143185017, 143185018, 143185024, 143185025, 143185026, 143185028, 143185030, 143185032, 143185033, 143185034, 143185036, 143185037, 143185038, 143185039, 143185041, 143185042, 143185043, 143185044, 143185045, 143185046, 143185047, 143185048, 143185049, 143185050, 143185051, 143185052, 143185053, 143185054, 143185056, 143185057, 143185058, 143185059, 143185060, 143185061, 143185064, 143185066, 143185067, 143185068, 143185069.
CurlingMan13 (2023-10-27 05:06:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15013
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143186182
5m4u9 (2023-10-27 03:08:58+00:00): Hola, Qué raro que editaste el boundary de los municipios en este cambio... estaba seguro que Rapid ID oculta los boundaries para evitar ediciones involuntarias. 🤔🤔🤔

Revisaré si hay error para reportar...
SomeoneElse (2023-10-27 01:14:57+00:00): This was a partial revert that had to be redone in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143187297 .
rskedgell (2023-10-27 05:32:24+00:00): How does adding crossing:markings=yes to a crossing=marked node help anyone? Is this not just tagging for a validator?

If you're using Bing aerial imagery, in most cases you should be able to see what type of crossing it is and tag appropriately, e.g.
zebra - crossing:markings=zebra;dots + crossing_ref=zebra
pelican/puffin - crossing:markings=dots

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:markings
rskedgell (2023-12-26 15:33:21+00:00): What value or additional information does adding crossing:markings=yes convey when added to crossing=marked? Neither actually give data consumers any useful information about the actual type of crossing.

All this does is tell me that there is a marked crossing which is marked.
CurlingMan13 (2023-10-27 05:00:26+00:00): Please use more detailed changeset comments.  Instead of "." tell us what you changed, and why.  thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143187467
Udarian (2023-10-28 18:32:33+00:00): yes, it would be amazing if you would start adding changeset comments to your commits.
CurlingMan13 (2023-10-28 19:17:25+00:00): Looks like they have already receieved 2 blocks for this exact thing.  And they are still continuing to commit changesets without comments.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15086
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:51+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 143182134, 143182135, 143182353, 143182359, 143182361, 143182363, 143182368, 143182369, 143182372, 143182373, 143182376, 143182378, 143182381, 143182382, 143182386, 143182389, 143182394, 143182398, 143182399, 143182402, 143182403, 143182404, 143182407, 143182412, 143182414, 143182417, 143182418, 143182420, 143182425, 143182427, 143182428, 143182433, 143182434, 143182435, 143182437, 143182439, 143182444, 143182445, 143182446, 143182450, 143182451, 143182455, 143182456, 143182458, 143182459, 143182460, 143182465, 143182466, 143182468, 143182470, 143182471, 143182476, 143182479, 143182480, 143182484, 143182486, 143182492, 143182494, 143182501, 143182502, 143182505, 143182507, 143182511, 143182514, 143182515, 143182522, 143182531, 143182535, 143182537, 143182543, 143182544, 143182549, 143182550, 143182556, 143182557, 143182561, 143182562, 143182566, 143182569, 143182570, 143182584, 143182590, 143182593, 143182595, 143182598, 143182604, 143182605, 143182607, 143182609, 143184948, 143184949, 143184950, 143184951, 143184952, 143184954, 143184955, 143184956, 143184957, 143184958, 143184959, 143184960, 143184962, 143184963, 143184964, 143184965, 143184966, 143184967, 143184968, 143184969, 143184971, 143184972, 143184973, 143184974, 143184975, 143184976, 143184977, 143184978, 143184979, 143184981, 143184984, 143184985, 143184986, 143184987, 143184988, 143184989, 143184992, 143184993, 143184994, 143184995, 143184997, 143184998, 143184999, 143185000, 143185001, 143185002, 143185003, 143185004, 143185005, 143185006, 143185007, 143185008, 143185009, 143185010, 143185011, 143185012, 143185013, 143185014, 143185015, 143185016, 143185017, 143185018, 143185024, 143185025, 143185026, 143185028, 143185030, 143185032, 143185033, 143185034, 143185036, 143185037, 143185038, 143185039, 143185041, 143185042, 143185043, 143185044, 143185045, 143185046, 143185047, 143185048, 143185049, 143185050, 143185051, 143185052, 143185053, 143185054, 143185056, 143185057, 143185058, 143185059, 143185060, 143185061, 143185064, 143185066, 143185067, 143185068, 143185069.
gscholz (2023-10-29 10:02:36+00:00): Hi compo_RK,
this changeset has destroyed several boundary relations:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-5.65768&lat=54.57083&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143187735

I have just fixed this here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143304502#map=17/54.57765/-5.71294

Guido
seattlefyi (2023-10-27 02:54:09+00:00): Hi, it looks like you may have accidentally renamed the park instead of the tree. :) Not a problem, I've already changed it back -- also, it looks like you were tagging a tree's reference number; I'd suggest adding a "ref=22" tag to the tree instead of giving it a descriptive name. Cheers!
pinecone460 (2023-10-27 04:47:40+00:00): Oh no! This was an assignment for a class project, which involved recording data about the locations and types of trees. The goal was to just add the trees to a local places list, and none of it at all would end up on OSM, but I must have pressed the "edit place on OSM" button instead of the "edit bookmark" one. I don't think the tree numbers are of any importance to anyone but me. And I renamed the park? Yikes... apologies.
seattlefyi (2023-10-27 23:56:57+00:00): Thanks for the concern, but don't worry about it - it was just one change, and it's already fixed - was just letting you know in case there was an OSM misunderstanding or process error. Glad the map is helpful for your project!
Minh Nguyen (2023-10-27 05:57:23+00:00): Subarea relation members aren’t really a good idea overall; this is what spatial queries are for…
Black_Diamond (2023-10-27 07:33:03+00:00): I was matching the same relationship style as the California and Santa Clara County subarea relationship.
Polarbear (2024-06-01 21:23:30+00:00): Besides adding hundreds of unnecessary roads, you disconneted the residential road Blumenstr from the main road. Why?
Repaired.
Polarbear (2024-06-01 21:29:19+00:00): You invented a fake road separation where there is only lane marking.
Polarbear (2024-06-01 22:10:15+00:00): Repaired. 
Your shifted roads and trams that were aligned to precise local orthophotos to less-precise global Bing. 
Why?
qugeb (2023-10-28 09:41:01+00:00): Was ist denn hier mit Ort "Nein" gemeint?
sahilister (2023-11-08 08:55:38+00:00): Hi apnkpr, 
wouldn't `landuse=institutional` with `office=government` better suited for Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Department ?
apnkpr (2023-12-02 14:37:36+00:00): yes, I think that would fit better, although I was initially discouraged by the note on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dinstitutional that says that the institutional tag is ambiguous/unclear. Also, taginfo mentions it is only used in ~1000 places. I don't feel too strongly about this, so feel free to update it to institutional if you wish. Thanks!
sahilister (2023-11-08 08:56:48+00:00): Likewise here,  `landuse=institutional` with `office=government` better suited for this as well?
Polarbear (2024-06-01 20:58:17+00:00): Several unnecessary nodes were added to a tram line, some actually creating kinks.
Amin Fozdar (2024-01-14 03:54:08+00:00): Hi,
Can you please make your changeset comments more detailed? I do not know what you edit is about, "Area Control" could be anything. Use this link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks
YPGGUUY (2023-10-27 03:21:00+00:00): Busline 21,24,204 go through this segment, but their new routes are unclear. Waiting for further information.
Herman Lee (2023-10-27 05:34:18+00:00): 您好，公交站请不要使用bus station之类的标签，比如：闵行渡口，谢谢
フーヴァー　リー (2023-10-27 06:29:05+00:00): 收到，已修改。当时是考虑到这里是终点站。
Herman Lee (2023-10-27 06:40:17+00:00): 如果你对公交编辑感兴趣可以到https://t.me/osmchina/113941或者QQ群810826702讨论
arjunaraoc (2024-01-07 01:43:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my update; https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145976637
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143190958
user_17222985 (2023-10-27 04:39:56+00:00): the boundaries of the village have been changed to a modern format
silversurfer83 (2023-10-30 16:51:52+00:00): Moin :)

bist du dir hier mit hw=residential für eine Ortsdurchfahrt sicher? Auch wenn es keine Bundesstr. mehr ist, ist es doch weiterhin die Hauptstraße welche auch den Durchgangsverkehr von einem Nachbarort in den nächsten leitet. 

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143191945
Jensefred (2023-10-31 07:03:19+00:00): Guude,

semi sicher . Ich hab mit anderen Orten verglichen. In Wollmar (Nachbarort) ist die Hauptstraße eine Kreisstraße -> hw=tertial... das ist in Münchhausen nur noch für die Teile B236 alt (bis zur Kreuzung) so, der Rest ist Gemeindestraße. Sonst hätte ich auch hw=tertial gelassen.

Gruß Jens
silversurfer83 (2023-10-31 09:09:27+00:00): Moin Jens

Wenn ich hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribuierung_von_Stra%C3%9Fen_in_Deutschland so gucke, dann würde ich bei den Hauptstraßen/Durchgangsstraßen bei tertiary bleiben, besonders, da im Wiki steht, dass eigentlich kein Sprung in der Stufe nur wegen Ortsbeginn stattfinden soll. Denn ob mit oder ohne Bundesstraße, es bleiben weiterhin Durchgangsstraßen, oder?

Grüße
Silversurfer83
Jensefred (2023-10-31 10:56:25+00:00): Gute Frage,
ich schaue es mir nachher nochmal an... hatte bisher nur das englische Wiki benutzt.
Da ist von leider von hessen.mobil soviel wahllos geändert worden...
Gruß Jens
silversurfer83 (2023-10-31 11:06:58+00:00): Öhm...
Die Aussage liest sich für mich jetzt nicht eindeutig 😅

Wo hat Hessen.mobil etwas geändert?
Jensefred (2023-10-31 14:43:15+00:00): Sorry, war mit dem Handy getippt... Da waren soviele Änderung durch Hessen Mobil, die ich versucht hatte einzuordnen... ich korrigiere... bzw. passe an. Danke für den Hinweis
BCNorwich (2023-10-28 07:40:32+00:00): Hi, many highway tags corrected.
Herman Lee (2023-10-29 04:29:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted. Please do not change railway to highway anymore.
thomaspesnel (2023-10-30 01:17:48+00:00): thank you. I did not realize i had selected a railway tag.
I just wanted to change road tags to allow pedestrian
andrashann (2024-01-15 22:23:01+00:00): Szia! Ezzel a szerkesztéssel mi volt a célod? Az erdő szélét jelölted meg mint földutat, és azt jelezted, hogy ezen nem szabad gépjárművel közlekedni. A jelölt vonal korábban nem út volt, hanem az erdőterület határa.
user_17222985 (2023-10-27 05:46:36+00:00): the duplicate of the school was removed
BCNorwich (2023-10-28 08:05:01+00:00): Hi, Lots of highways corrected.
Mazda05 (2023-10-27 20:00:24+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
Mazda05 (2023-10-27 18:17:56+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
user_11609320 (2023-10-27 06:36:00+00:00): rio ranch was bought by cardenas
impiaaa (2023-10-27 20:36:35+00:00): If it's verifiable and you can't find a better tag, leave it alone, even if it's a unique tag, otherwise you're just deleting good data for no reason. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like
Black_Diamond (2023-10-27 23:47:39+00:00): Thanks for that information. I moved the bike locker information to the bike locker in this changeset. The disabled capacity seemed wrong based on satellite imagery. I couldn't find the bike racks, even when I went there last time. I couldn't find the meaning of kiss_n_rid, and 0 didn't have meaning in my mind.

I'll look into adding loading_zn information, but I'll try to map it to more appropriate tags. I'll try to look into that later, perhaps today or tomorrow.
impiaaa (2023-10-28 00:48:13+00:00): Thanks. The tags were added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29688748 , so you could ask the author of that change, or go to the VTA, the source they list.
Black_Diamond (2023-10-28 21:48:22+00:00): I moved the loading_zn information to the actual segment of the road where there is a loading zone. At least I've seen people parked there waiting closest to the light rail in front of the buses. I added the bike rack back, but I can't verify it because I didn't see the location of the rack. It's hard to prove the non-existence, unless I scour the area more thoroughly.
user_5359 (2023-10-28 10:21:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please a node for every company inside the building, if there are more than one company inside.
map per (2023-10-28 11:14:25+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Sieht gut aus, hab nur noch memorial=gefallenendenkmal in memorial=war_memorial (1) geändert (vgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11292567772/history)

Viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:memorial=war%20memorial?uselang=de
MWE69a (2023-11-08 14:42:24+00:00): Das ? war wegen der unklaren Beschriftung in ein paar Fällen (sind das Wk1, Wk2-Namen ?), aber das interessiert hier nicht. Ok. MWE69a
map per (2023-11-08 15:29:57+00:00): Changeset Kommentare sind eigentlich dafür da die eigenen Änderungen zu beschreiben. Ich glaube nicht das sich hier noch wer meldet, der mehr zu dem Denkmal weiß.
MWE69a (2023-11-08 15:41:48+00:00): Soso. Du weißt also hier Bescheid. Gut.

Erklär besser mal, wie man eine Hausnummer zu einem bestehenden Gebäude zufügt.

Die vorliegenden sog. "Erklärungen" hier sind mehr als, naja; - 

Typisch deutsch & daher beschissen selbstreferenziell.
map per (2023-11-08 17:49:58+00:00): Danke für dein offenes und ehrliches Feedback. Mit Referenzen auf (1) und (2) hätte ich meine sogenannte Erklärung in der Tat besser machen können.

(1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes
(2) https://community.openstreetmap.org/
MxxCon (2023-10-27 08:15:19+00:00): Hello.
Once again, times square location information is already encoded in the branch= tag.
As such this edit will be reverted in full.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143196149
NieWnen (2023-10-28 20:27:19+00:00): Zmiany organizacji ruchu na 1 dzień, 4 dni przed to przesada. 

Proszę nie rób tak na przyszłość, to nie pomaga.

Tak krótkich zmian wynikających z powodu np. święta, marszu/maratonu, czy innego tego typu krótkotrwałych wydarzeń nie mapujemy.
Tomek | Yanosik (2023-10-30 06:50:40+00:00): Ok.
Dawid2849 (2023-10-27 13:16:01+00:00): ooo, nie wiedziałem o tej przebudowie. dobra robota!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-27 07:30:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11292614071

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
opendcc (2023-10-27 11:17:32+00:00): Hi Michi, meinst Du nicht, dass sowas name-tagging ist?
miche101 (2023-10-27 15:14:06+00:00): Hi,

"name-tagging" für das... Bin ich schon zu lange dabei.... Das gab es damals nicht. Damit fange ich nicht an... Alle zwanghaft nicht mit Name= zu taggen . Das glaub ich wird auch nur in Deutschland so gemacht.

Hab mich beim tagging an anderen Objekten in DE orientiert. 

Gruß Miche
MarcoR (2023-10-27 07:58:35+00:00): ricordati di "ortogonalizzare" gli edifici: la stragrande maggioranza di quelli costruiti recentemente ha angoli interni di 90 gradi
Filip009 (2023-10-27 21:25:46+00:00): Dobrý deň, keď niečo pridávate napíšte prosím aspoň spisovne jeho názov.
user_17222985 (2023-10-27 08:21:37+00:00): STORE TAGS FROM POI MOVED TO BUILDING 
FARMYARD NAME CLARIFIED
Patr1k_P (2023-10-31 15:41:13+00:00): tu si oznacil brod na celej ceste https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/407780513/history
jak_hor96 (2023-10-31 15:47:28+00:00): Ďakujem za upozornenie. Chyba odstránená.
Langlaeufer (2023-10-29 10:46:43+00:00): Ich finde es sieht jetzt gut aus. Hab noch die Brücke geändert, weil ohne Kfz ist es dann eher ein path, oder gibt es irgendeine Ausnahme vom KfZ no?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143199488
F10sh (2023-10-31 12:24:48+00:00): Das gesamte südliche Wohngebiet ist mit Pollern umschlossen und vermutlich nur für Anwohner und Service befahrbar. Ich kann mich aber auch an keine Schilder erinnern. Für Besucher gibt es einen separaten Parkplatz im Wald.
BCNorwich (2023-10-27 13:05:01+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

From the Bing Imagery and other popular imagery, it looks like there is a path along that embankment. Did you mean to say there is no Public Right of Way here? If so that's a different matter. Please be aware that paths other than PRoW's can be mapped to OSM. Indeed I think that is the case here. So unless you know that no path exists here, in any manner, then the path should be reinstated.

Regards Bernard.
superjanegf (2023-10-27 14:21:14+00:00): In response to your comments regarding changeset 143199686; 
Access to this short section of seawall is restricted by a locked gate.
The "path" goes nowhere, it terminates after a couple of hundred yards at a creek,
The landowner wants no trespass on this private land owing to the risk of disturbance to nesting birds.
There is no Right of Way.
In the interests of conservation management, it should remain deleted.
The Bing Imagery looks suspiciously like a copy of osm data

Regards Jane
umapjpnic793 (2023-10-27 13:47:32+00:00): よくできた、追加してくれてありがとう。
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-27 09:10:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11292688553
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1082746125

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2023-10-27 09:40:12+00:00): Beste jjj  Svp niet schuiven met de kaart in editmous. Het gebied van je edits is te groot.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-10-27 09:44:04+00:00): Straat de Haven heb ik terug gezet op bicycle=no Daar staat een C15 bord.
Wat is je bron in deze?
Niet zomaar wegen opne zetten voor fietsers svp.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-10-27 09:46:18+00:00): surface = asfalt is geen valide tag. Svp de wiki raadplegen hoe de ondergrond te taggen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:surface
jjjj14 (2023-11-03 16:36:14+00:00): Excuses voor de trage reactie.
Ik zal erop letten dat ik niet meer schuif in editmodus.
Straat de Haven is toegankelijk voor fietsers omdat het fietspad niet gebruikt mag worden vanwege opvang voor Oekrainers in een naastgelegen schip. Dit is uiteraard tijdelijk, maar is ondertussen al meer dan een jaar en kan zomaar nog jaren duren...
eggie (2023-11-03 18:04:02+00:00): Oke... ik zal het straks weer aanpassen.
.. en ook een note= bijzetten met jouw extra info.

Dan wordt het alleen een kwestie van in de gaten houden.
Dan zal er wellicht met dat fietspad ook moeten worden aangepast?
Groet..
eggie
eggie (2023-11-03 18:20:01+00:00): Haven weer opengezet voor tweewielers... note met uitleg toegevoegd. 
Mag je wel wandelen langs het opvangschip? Er loopt namelijk een wandelroute.
eggie (2023-11-03 18:47:56+00:00): Fietspad langs opvang tijdelijk omgetagd naar service met een destinationtag uitgezonderd voetgangers.
jjjj14 (2023-11-04 10:23:54+00:00): Lijkt me prima opgelost zo. Zodra het opvangschip weg is, zal ik alles weer terugdraaien.
eggie (2023-11-04 17:20:37+00:00): Top!
A67-A67 (2023-10-27 15:21:57+00:00): Hoi, 
Het lijkt dat je hier de A13 hebt teruggelegd naar een inmiddels verouderde positie. Ook heb je het fietspad dat wordt aangelegd tussen de kruising Vliegveldweg en de Schieveensedijk (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674493358) verwijderd.
A67-A67 (2023-10-27 15:26:36+00:00): Ik heb deze zaken teruggezet m.b.v. de satellietfoto van september.
fester7 (2023-11-04 10:52:11+00:00): Excuus je hebt helemaal gelijk. Foutje van mij inderdaad. Mag ik vragen hoe je de satellietbeelden van september in kunt laden? Ik dacht dat ik de meest recente had.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-27 09:40:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/417300161

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
trigpoint (2023-12-08 12:43:31+00:00): What legal restrictions are there of trucks not being allowed to use this road?

The only visible signage is that motor vehicles can use it only for access which has been incorrectly mapped as motorcar and motor_cycle.

Truck is not a valid tag in osm however I have corrected the tagging to motor_vehicle=destination.
Vis_M (2025-09-03 11:00:19+00:00): The changeset comment says "Added missing road" while all the changes made in this edit was wrongly classify all roads as "residential".
eggie (2023-10-27 09:58:26+00:00): Mooi ... een nieuw fietspad! Weer actueel. Zou je kunnen aangeven waarom je smoothness=bad hebt getagd op een spiksplinternieuw fietspad?

MVG
eggie