piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2024-11-16 07:16:35+00:00): amenity=school heb ik toegevoegd en naam verplaatst naar adresnode.
De rest van de tagging is oke.

MVG
eggie
rempshaener (2024-11-15 19:36:19+00:00): Ich gehe mal davon aus, dass das ein Zweitaccount von https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/MrBB ist
Filip009 (2024-11-19 14:54:13+00:00): Pozor na mazanie domov s adresami https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71695641
Davit125 (2024-11-19 15:00:09+00:00): Ospravedlňujem sa možno som sa preklikol.
Filip009 (2024-11-19 15:17:54+00:00): V iDeditore (ktorým sa mapa upravuje cez prehliadač) sa to stáva často, pretože editor adresy zebrazuje len v ľavej lište, nie priamo na budove. Odporúčam editor JOSM, ktorý je už ale aplikácia, ale zobrazuje čísla domov.
Davit125 (2024-11-19 15:21:31+00:00): Dobre budem vedieť nabudúce. Ďakujem
Davit125 (2024-11-19 15:23:33+00:00): A ešte sa chcem spýtať ohľadom domu s číslom 40 ako to funguje presne, pretože ten dom približne pred 2 rokmi celý zhorel a teraz tam na jeho mieste je iba nejaké uložené veci?
Dodko (2024-11-22 11:25:57+00:00): Ak zhorel a už neostali ruiny, tak vymazať.
Ale keďže na leteckej foto ho vidieť aj v katastri stále "existuje" https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mapka/sk/kataster/detail/kataster/parcela-c/875236/12 tak by ho niekto mohol nazad pridať, preto použite 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:P%C5%99edpona_%C5%BEivotn%C3%ADho_cyklu

Pred značku building=yes dáte vhodnú predponu.
Davit125 (2024-11-22 11:40:31+00:00): Dobre, opravené. Ďakujem
Dodko (2024-11-22 11:47:47+00:00): Namiesto building=demolished=building
použite 
demolished:building=yes
alebo skôr
destroyed:building=yes
Davit125 (2024-11-22 11:55:07+00:00): Opravené :)
Dodko (2024-11-22 12:01:59+00:00): Pozri na to lepšie, kde to treba upravovať.
https://ibb.co/6rSvTDW
rempshaener (2024-11-15 20:08:44+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Anpassungen gebeten.
Diesem Wunsch komme ich gerne nach.

Folgende Anmerkungen hätte ich:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/389465389
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9692707166
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9692653753

Bitte Hydranten nicht mit Straßen verbinden. Das lässt sich leicht lösen, in dem du in iD den Knoten markierst und „E“ drückst.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3159350725
Gleiches gilt für Gebäude

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12344601822
Hier stimmt etwas nicht. Ein Unterflurhydrant kann nicht an einem Wassertank hängen. Kannst du mal beschreiben, was du gesehen hast?

Vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Nur durch lokales Wissen können derart wichtige Daten zusammengetragen werden.

Viele Grüße
bkil (2024-11-15 19:50:41+00:00): Köszönjük a felvitelt. Szeretném megjegyezni, hogy az addr:city kulcs alatt még szokás feltüntetni minden házszámhoz a településnevet is.
eggie (2024-11-15 20:14:35+00:00): Dag JeePee,

Wellicht beter noexit=yes op de eindnodes..
Iets als niet bestaand lijkt me anders merkwaardig.
MVG
eggie
JeePeeNL (2024-11-15 22:21:16+00:00): Hi Eggie, en het Ford object wat er nu nog is verwijderen? Ik zie nu dat ik alleen dat kenmerk op nee heb gezet, maar het is er helemaal niet. Het paadje loopt dood op de beek en er is geen oversteek mogelijk. 200m naar het noorden is er wel een oversteek.
eggie (2024-11-16 07:14:18+00:00): Hoi ,
Daarom kun je beter die ex oversteek verwijderen. Dan zet je noexit=yes op die eindnodes van die doodlopende stukken. Desnoods een note=.....  met uitleg op die nodes.
MVG
eggie
JeePeeNL (2024-11-16 08:04:04+00:00): Ha top, dank je voor de uitleg. Ik heb verwijderd en de noexit erop gezet en opgeslagen. In een 2e stap heb ik dat hele stuk pad verwijderd omdat dat er eigenlijk helemaal niet meer is en iemand anders dat ook al had aangegeven maar niet weg kreeg. Ik heb die wijziging gemarkeerd voor review. Klopt dat zo? Dank.
Lumikeiju (2024-11-15 22:00:01+00:00): Correct changeset comment is "Update building geometry and tags; add benches".
medic12 (2024-11-15 21:10:45+00:00): Change made in coordination with:
1) OSM Legal Team
2) All Trails Admin
3) Spotsylvania County Commissioner of Revenue 
4) Spotsylvania County Sheriffs Department
5) Spotsylvania Fire and Rescue
6) Land Owners Legal Representation
7) Land Owner
Reference Email: Re: Trespassing 15NOV2024 16:01
woodpeck (2024-11-21 18:37:51+00:00): Dear medic12, none of the seven points you are making above is sufficient reason to delete paths from OSM. We *only* delete paths that don't exist (and we would want more proof of that than the word of a land owner). Paths that exist but are not open for public use must receive proper "access" tags, as you have been told multiple times when you attempted the same changes in September last year.  

Please email us at data@osmfoundation.org and include the correspondence you claim to have had with the "OSM legal team" so that we can review the situation. Until then, your edits are reverted.
ManuelB701 (2024-11-16 06:04:25+00:00): Es wäre übrigens besser, wenn du Gebäueteile nicht sofort löscht sondern diese als solche mappst.
NeisBot (2024-11-15 20:41:25+00:00): Hello Diogo Carmo, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1334342939
https://osm.org/way/1334342940
https://osm.org/way/1334342941
https://osm.org/way/1334342942

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=159186295
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-17 10:49:43+00:00): Thank you for your private message.

Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159186367
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-17 10:49:50+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159186295
mavl (2024-11-16 04:01:12+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет здания непрямоугольной формы. Здания такой формы - редкость. В редакторе iD (которым вы пользуетесь) есть команда "Сделать углы прямыми"). Примеры зданий:  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1334345259  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1334345271
Danil Moiseenko (2024-11-16 05:09:35+00:00): Здравствуйте. Да вы правы, будет исправлено в ближайшее время.
Danil Moiseenko (2024-11-16 05:42:50+00:00): Исправлено
mavl (2024-11-16 06:21:25+00:00): Спасибо.
Langlaeufer (2024-11-17 16:01:25+00:00): Hast du den Verursacher kontaktiert? Ich sehe hier einfach nur einen Verständnisfehler was links und rechts angeht.
Romwriter (2024-11-17 18:52:17+00:00): Hallo Langlaeufer, ich habe den Benutzer TheIsirganOt nicht kontaktiert. Ich hatte nämlich nicht die Erwartung, dass hier nachhaltig irgendwelche konstruktiven Beiträge kommen. Die Brücke als gesperrt markieren zu wollen ohne Rücksicht darauf, dass sie schon als gesperrt markiert war und dass ToniE unter https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/121618 zutreffend darauf hingewiesen hat, lässt mich darauf schließen, dass dieser Benutzer schlichtweg keine Rücksicht auf vorhandene sinnvolle Daten nimmt. Die handwerklichen Fehler (Rechts-Links usw.) sind da bloß das Sahnehäubchen auf dem Gesamtbild. Beste Grüße, Romwriter
emersonveenstra (2024-11-18 16:09:35+00:00): Hi there,

Did you mean to keep the name "Shopko" on this node?
Hypsometric (2024-11-18 20:09:26+00:00): Thanks for catching that. I just updated again, removing the name.
nurdafur (2025-12-28 11:24:18+00:00): Hallo Thomas
Bist du diesen Weg wirklich gewandert? Wahrscheinlich eher nicht. Highway=track ist das sicher nicht. Ich bin nämlich das eingezeichnete Wegstück tatsächlich gewandert.
Wenn du nichts dagegen hast, dann lösche ich das Stück wieder.
santamariense (2024-11-20 19:26:14+00:00): Olá vilela00,

Gostaria de checar contigo se não teria sido engano marcar este pedaço de via como mão única. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1334351168 uma vez que quem precisa trafegar no sentido contrário precisa fazer uma volta considerável.

Agradeço se puder checar e confirmar.

[]'s
rskedgell (2024-11-15 23:27:52+00:00): (Review requested)

No, unfortunately turning the entire length of the driveway into a tunnel=building_passage is neither helpful nor coherent. Highways are often split into segments because their physical properties differ along their length. In this case, a passage through a building with a 4.5m surveyed clearance only applies where the road goes through the building.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage

I have reverted your changeset, so there's nothing you need to do here.
Glassman (2024-11-16 17:08:40+00:00): #TIP: The road you added looks like a driveway instead of an unclassified road. An unclassified road is like a residential street in a rural area. Driveways are tag as highway=service + service=driveway. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159187677
Glassman (2024-11-16 03:03:14+00:00): Instead of removing the trail a better option is to add the access=private tag to help prevent unauthorized access to the trail. By removing the trail someone can easily add it back. Can you review this changeset?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159187829
choferqp (2024-11-18 16:44:06+00:00): Hello, We discovered through hiking websites utilizing OpenStreetMap as their base that these "trails" are not being curated and simply appear as viable options for those recreating in the area. The unsanctioned trails in this section are within the boundaries of Phase 1 Development of Three Sisters Village. This area is currently under construction therefore these trails no longer exist. TSV phase 1 is a comprehensive development with 42% open space and an extensive pathway network. Once construction is completed we're happy to update the maps with the newly constructed multi-use trail system and mountain bike trails.  Our utmost priority is the safety of the public which is why we've undertaken editing to ensure people are aware of the construction zone and where they can safely travel
Glassman (2024-11-18 17:38:04+00:00): Thanks for the info and look forward to seeing the completed project mapped in OSM
mike140 (2024-11-15 22:03:02+00:00): Стадіон - це щось значно більше ніж такі об'єкти. Мають бути трибуни та інша стадіонна інфраструктура. Тут достатньо "футбольного поля" - теги: leisure=pitch + sport=soccer та покриття: surface=grass
Tarasssst (2024-11-15 22:07:42+00:00): Якщо вам не важко, виправіть будь ласка, ще не дуже розуміюсь в тегах
mike140 (2024-11-15 22:15:13+00:00): Зробив. У колонці Властивості об'єкта внизу є розділ Теги - там два режими - можна перемикати для зручності. Там можна додавати будь-які теги
JJIglesias (2024-11-16 00:18:52+00:00): Por Favor, cuando dibujes edificios no te olvides que deben ortogonalizarse o escuadrarse en su gran mayoría, para ello solo tienes que marcar la edificación y presionar la letra Q y automáticamente se ejecutara para ese edificio y asi sucesivamente debes hacer.

Gracias
AndyB_66 (2025-11-02 18:08:34+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
VLD291 (2024-11-15 22:48:00+00:00): *altered tunnel values for segments
rskedgell (2024-11-15 23:30:29+00:00): (Review requested)

No, not really. You can read the documentation for the layer key at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-21 01:38:53+00:00): Why are you deleting everything?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159189587
mga_geo (2024-11-16 08:00:51+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous venez de casser plusieurs relations "route=bus".
Pour la relation 12307563, je ne comprends pas vos modifications.
Découper un rond-point est souvent une mauvaise idée et a un impact sur les objets liés.
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
Marc
mga_geo (2024-11-18 05:33:46+00:00): Pouvez-vous répondre s'il vous plait ?
Marc
adamos (2024-11-18 14:36:33+00:00): Hello, sorry for that unintentional mess-up. I did a roll-back, hop it will be fine for now.
AndyB_66 (2025-11-02 18:08:23+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
StefanB (2025-03-03 15:29:27+00:00): Glede na velikost gradbišča razvidnega na ortofotu in OPPN 391:
https://www.ljubljana.si/assets/Uploads/dop-osn-OPPN-391-Jurckova-zahod.pdf
se bo "Ulica drevakov" imenovala neka nova ulica vzhodno od te, ki si jo preimenoval.
StefanB (2025-03-07 12:16:20+00:00): Preimenoval nazaj na Jurčkovo cesto in vrisal novo ulico drevakov v gradnji
pecege3 (2024-11-16 14:36:53+00:00): Boas Rodrigo!
Por curiosidade, ¿Como soubeches que estaban aí?
Un saúdo.
Rodrigo Rega (2024-11-16 17:26:48+00:00): Boas, nas fotos aéreas de PNOA vese a forma típica do chan formado por lousas irregulares. Xuntando eso con que xusto ó lado hai hórreos.

Un saúdo.
pecege3 (2024-11-16 19:55:20+00:00): Bo apunte! 
Aínda que tamén hai casos nos que o horreo foi trasladado de lugar.

Un saúdo.
TrickyFoxy (2024-11-17 15:13:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1334377933

Тут 0=3000 удалить или вольтаж переделать?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-20 07:08:57+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3165950046/history has shop = dollhouse that was added in this edit
shop=dollhouse ? Maybe it would be better to tag it as subtag of shop=toys (say toys=dollhouse) ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=toys

Having separate top level value for every type of toy seems a bit too much...

Or should we document this shop value as distinct, valid and useful?
Tracerneo (2025-12-20 10:49:06+00:00): To answer your question re. =toys: Absolutely not. It's a miniature store, not a toy store. More appropriate tag may be shop=model
It is mentioned in https://miniatures.org/sites/miniatures.org/files/MJ15Gazettevol43no5.pdf (Miniature Gazette), you can see pictures in there for the type of products they deal in.
The particular node is possibly a defunct business. My changeset was particularly unifying shop=doll_house spelling variation of the tag to more appropriate shop=dollhouse
There could be possibly a better tag for these kinds of stores and stores with dolls (and other otaku goods).
rskedgell (2024-11-16 06:21:56+00:00): (Review requested)

Adding a fictitious vertical separation to get rid of a warning generated by the iD editor is not a good idea.

The iD editor makes a lot of suggestions, some of which are ill-advised, but they are only suggestions. If you do not know how to resolve an issue, even after reading the documentation, please leave a fixme tag on the affected objects and/or add a note to the map.

The actual reason for iD generating this warning is that you incorrectly added building=yes to the enclosing polygon for the school in changeset #159150764. If this really were the case, iD would expect to find different layers, or a tunnel=building_passage.

I have fixed both issues.
rskedgell (2024-11-16 16:33:54+00:00): (Review requested)

That wasn't the problem, but it's now fixed.
Szymson (2026-04-12 09:48:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5240834
czebureks (2026-04-12 10:47:46+00:00): Dzięki, poprawiłem
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-21 09:37:02+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12345084051/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Sunset_Sakura (2025-04-21 09:58:46+00:00): As you can see there is a fixme=type and fixme:type="marine technology". It's a commercial tech business which specialises in marine. It's not a shop.
Excuse me if that comment was automated.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-10 07:05:01+00:00): no, not automated

so it is a company office, right?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-10 07:05:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5683562131

someone marked it as office=it - not sure whether it makes sense
Sunset_Sakura (2025-05-11 20:18:10+00:00): office=it suggests that it is digital technologies, which isn't very accurate. They research and develop technology for marine uses. I'm not sure of a more specific tag, there wasn't much on the wiki. See their website for additional context:
https://www.zebra-tech.co.nz/
csimeona22 (2024-11-19 18:03:34+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery, Bing Streetside.
topolusitania (2024-11-16 15:36:15+00:00): Olá
Fotos mais recentes da zona com novos edificios::
OrtoSat - Portugal Continental - 30cm - 2023 (DGT). (Verificar alinhamento)
renosmo (2024-11-16 19:13:13+00:00): Olá. Se entendi bem o seu comentário, verifiquei o alinhamento dos edifícios no hospital, com o mapa que me indicou, e parecem-me estar (essencialmente) correctos. Para além de que, eu não tinha mexido nos edifícios; apenas nas estradas. E, por isso, não entendo bem o seu comentário.
renosmo (2024-11-16 19:22:01+00:00): Consultando agora o seu registo de alterações, já percebi o seu comentário: adicionou o aparente novo parque de estacionamento do hospital, que agora está no lugar do heliporto. Pensei em fazer o mesmo, mas por não saber se era uma alteração definitiva, achei melhor não mexer. Não há problema. Fica ao critério de cada editor. E, não precisa de se justificar perante mim.
topolusitania (2024-11-16 23:52:25+00:00): Há mais pavilhões, de acordo com as fotos de 2023 :-)
renosmo (2024-11-17 01:56:23+00:00): Entendido. Quem souber o que são, pode depois acrescentá-los então.
rskedgell (2024-11-16 06:10:16+00:00): This is not a dual carriageway, either in terms of OpenStreetMap's mapping conventions or law - there is no physical separation of the lanes by a central reservation.

The OSM wiki for central reservations is here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway

The legal definition in Schedule 6 Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, which sets national speed limits for different classes of vehicle uses the following definition: 
“dual-carriageway road” means a road part of which consists of a central reservation to separate a carriageway to be used by vehicles proceeding in one direction from a carriageway to be used by vehicles proceeding in the opposite direction.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/27/schedule/6/paragraph/2
yasslay (2024-11-19 10:02:53+00:00): Reverted because these highways are drawn incorrectly. Single carriageways should be drawn as one single line despite any hatching or islands ─ distinct from brief sections of dual carriageway.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159316792
FajrAl (2025-01-10 08:24:49+00:00): Dapat sumber rencana Jalan Jenderal Sudirman dari mana ya, Pak Farras?
FajrAl (2025-01-13 22:53:22+00:00): Halo Pak/Bu Farras. Mohon bisa elaborasikan mengenai sumber data area pembangunan sekitar Pantai Indah Kapuk 2 dan legalitasnya untuk diunggah di OSM? Termasuk rencana trase Jalan Jenderal Sudirman? Takutnya kena Copyright Violation.
Farras (2025-01-15 17:08:52+00:00): Kontribusi saya berasal dari pemantauan foto satelit Sentinel-2 terkini, mas Fajr. Perihal legalitas di OpenStreetMap: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sentinel-2
FajrAl (2025-01-16 00:51:04+00:00): Thanks responnya Pak Farras. Baru ngeh kemarin sebenarnya. Kemarin juga baru sempet liat citra Sentinel-2 juga.
NeisBot (2024-11-16 03:44:38+00:00): Hi Edmonds College Plant Map, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 98% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 21 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=159193670
trigpoint (2024-11-16 13:39:47+00:00): This has been reverted under Ticket#2024111610000074 — suspicious activity of user Edmonds College Plant Map. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159202716
Glassman (2024-11-16 17:18:34+00:00): You added a large building near the Mukilteo Ferry Terminal but the imagery doesn't so it. Can you confirm it's there?

You also accidentally dragged a node of a parking aisle road. I fixed that.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159193991
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-13 14:25:53+00:00): Are we sure those are ALPRs and not just the traffic detection cameras?  I know that signal's been on video traffic detection for years.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159194384
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-21 01:23:17+00:00): Why were highway tags changed from path to footway? Why was industrial park changed to parking?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159195263
ChillyDL (2024-11-17 16:41:50+00:00): Hallo TMTB, danke für deine Bearbeitungen im Grunewald! In dem Fall hier allerdings hast du ein paar Wege aus der Datenbank gelöscht, weil sie nicht offiziell seien. Ob Wege offiziell sind oder nicht, spielt für die Aufnahme und das Behalten in OpenStreetMap jedoch keine Rolle, sondern nur, ob es sie vor Ort sichtbar gibt ("On the Ground Rule, siehe z.B. hier:
https://openstreetmap.de/projekt/was-geh%C3%B6rt-nach-osm/)
Und vor Ort sind sie sehr deutlich sichtbar. Wenn sie z. B. gesperrt wären (sind sie nicht), würde das durch access=privat, =no o.ä. ausgedrückt.
Revertierst du deine Löschung deshalb bitte? Falls du nicht sicher bist, wie es geht, gib gern Bescheid.
TMTB (2024-11-17 18:23:20+00:00): Hallo, ich weiß leider nicht, wie ich die Löschung revertieren kann.
TMTB (2024-11-17 18:44:45+00:00): Hab's hinbekommen.
ChillyDL (2024-11-17 20:54:34+00:00): Alles klar, danke, und weiter viel Spaß hier!
monhiko (2024-11-16 11:35:48+00:00): 多谢！
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-06 17:16:39+00:00): Hello!

You used
colour=weiss
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12345585613/history

Have you maybe meant
colour=white
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-16 07:40:46+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1334461954

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-11-16 08:05:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Hier heb je meer gedaan dan alleen een straatnaam. Probeer het gebied van je edits te beperken tot die straat zelf. Schuiven met de kaart geeft vaak schade en je edits zijn nauwelijks te controleren.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-11-16 08:09:07+00:00): start_date staat al op de gebouwomtrek. 

Wat is de bedoeling van die notes?
1829 Huisnr1832 Huisnr 211920 Huisnr 561937 Huisnr 78

Beter niets aan de import BAG adresnodes veranderen. 
Wanneer iets niet klopt kun je dat aan het Kadaster doorgeven.
eggie (2024-11-16 08:12:45+00:00): Dag Rood... Alleen een website toevoegen aan een adres doet niet in OSM.. Geef ook de aard en de naam van de instelling aan.
office= ? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-11-16 08:15:09+00:00): Wellicht iets met heritage ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:heritage#Netherlands
eggie (2024-11-16 08:31:34+00:00): Tip ... en de tag description=  en historic=...... gebruiken
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-11-16 08:21:03+00:00): Dag JeePee  Wat er niet meer is kan uiteraard weg.
Wanneer je op een luchtfoto nog een pad ziet lopen tag ik vaak eerst disused:highway=path  met note=... (uitleg) .  Dat voorkomt dan opnieuw intekenen door een medemapper.
MVG
eggie
JeePeeNL (2024-11-16 12:35:15+00:00): Ah ok dank je weer. Goed weekeinde.