piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2026-03-26 08:19:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
jaap de vries (2026-04-14 08:17:41+00:00): Thijs,
Mocht je brandgangetjes op deze kaart gaan zetten, graag dit toevoegen:
highway=footway
footway=alley

Ook graag opletten waar de brandgang stopt en of er een poort voorstaat.
eggie (2026-03-26 08:20:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
MappingMore (2026-03-26 10:10:08+00:00): Revert of 180420829
World_Winner (2026-03-26 09:43:50+00:00): Revert of 180419801
MappingMore (2026-03-26 06:51:36+00:00): Revert of 180418707
rarad74 (2026-03-26 08:18:50+00:00): Salut. Tocmai ce am trecut aseara prin fata ei si este inchisa pentru a fi preluata de Minifarm. Astia au preluat majoritatea farmaciilor Beneva  si Tinos.
Sp[er sa nu uitam sa adaugam Minifarm cand va fi gata reamenajarea. O zi usoara!
nevw (2026-03-26 12:05:42+00:00): Hi, this node was a duplicate of the hotel and I have deleted it. Also the menu tag url did not go to the menu.
渤海西岸 (2026-03-26 09:53:05+00:00): 中国·国家地名信息库
地名信息
2004年由唐山市丰润区人民政府批准命名。因该路通往车轴山中学，故命名车轴山路。1999年建成，名为宁国大路，后于2004年更名为车轴山路，一直沿用此名称至今。
MappingMore (2026-03-27 01:19:03+00:00):  Partially Revert of 180403358
rarad74 (2026-03-26 08:15:05+00:00): Salut. Nu trebuie neaparat sa pui acces=no in zona privata, ca asa nicio navigatie nu te va mai ruta acolo pana la destinatie sub nicio forma. E suficient sa pui acces=private si ebventual suplimenta si o poarta tot cu acces=private. O zi buna.
Marius Bughiu (2026-03-26 09:57:09+00:00): Salut, am vazut ca ai si facut tu modificarile, multumesc!
4004 (2026-03-29 00:29:30+00:00): это вы про стелу? похоже, она уже отмечена, только на месте билборда https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1023480728284861&focus=photo&lat=53.578367599972&lng=24.256808599972&z=17&x=0.22439352455227524&y=0.654504708051606&zoom=2.162162030194257
FajrAl (2026-03-27 00:33:01+00:00): Mohon untuk menambahkan komentar perubahannya sebelum diunggah.
osm.wiki/Go_Map!!/Submitting_Changes
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-04-13 13:48:23+00:00): جزاك الله خير
aceman444 (2026-05-06 09:11:03+00:00): You must not optimize data for some particular router. You tag what is correct, not what a particular app likes. None of the routers on osm.org (like Valhalla) are particularly good so if they produce something wrong, it is not really relevant.
On this road, you made dubious changes: if there is only one lane, how can there be lane markings? And if there is only one lane, how can it be marked merge_to_right ? There is no other lane on the right to merge to.
SpinOff (2026-03-27 22:05:38+00:00): Hej. Może żeby doprecyzować - tagi z rodziny access (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:access) stosuje się jedynie wtedy gdy ograniczenia w korzystaniu z drogi wynikają z przepisów, czyli np. zakaz wjazdu, zakaz ruchu, itp. Do oznaczenia tego jak bardzo droga nadaje się dla pojazdów kołowych jest tag smoothness - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:smoothness
aceman444 (2026-05-06 09:10:53+00:00): Hi, what is the source of the maxspeed? You only claim to use basemap.at Orthofoto, where you of course canot see maxspeed signs. If you used it because there is maxspeed=60 on the B137 road, then that is dubious, as you are not on that road yet. Unless this road is again separated wrongly and is actually just a merge lane of B137.
eggie (2026-03-26 08:21:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
FajrAl (2026-03-30 16:50:40+00:00): Untuk pemetaan PoI tempat kemah, shelter, dan mata air di OpenStreetMap, harap buat titiknya terpisah (tersendiri/independen) dan tidak menumpang ke jalan.
nevw (2026-03-26 12:03:52+00:00): Hi, this node was a duplicate of the hotel and I have deleted it. Also the menu tag url did not go to the menu.
rarad74 (2026-03-26 07:35:27+00:00): Salut. Te rog nu mai schim,ba categorii de drum deoarece strici rutare. De abia ai intrat pe openstreetmap si deja te bagi la lucruri la care nu ai experienta. Ia-o mai incet te rog!.
user_15202633 (2026-03-26 07:42:49+00:00): https://aspmb.ro/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/listastrazi.pdf
rarad74 (2026-03-26 07:48:49+00:00): Ce treaba are hotararea primarieii cu schimbarea categoriei de drum. Nici nu este afisata anexa in care sa explice ce lucrari trebuie sa aibe loc in zona.
user_15202633 (2026-03-26 07:54:26+00:00): Pe scurt hotărârea atestă condițiile actuale de drum și include analiza urbanistică a drumurilor inclusiv fluxurile de trafic din cartierele dense cu multe blocuri.
rarad74 (2026-03-26 07:57:36+00:00): Inca odata. Nu are treaba cu ce a descoperit si horat primaria. Oricum acolo lucreaza o gramada de incompetenti si nu m-as baza niciodata pe analizele lor. opesntreetmap are propriile reguli de categorisire a drumurilor care sunt personalizate in timp in functie de traficul real cules de pe diverse navigatii care folosesc aceasta harta.
rarad74 (2026-03-26 07:59:46+00:00): Ca exeplu suplimentar - acici in Piata Operei este o "bucla de trafic ce trebuie inchisa aici si asta in principal se face cu aceeasi categorie de drum. Aceasta schema este aplicata si in alte orase/situatii similare, atata la noi in tara cat si ain alte tari.
user_15202633 (2026-03-26 08:02:23+00:00): Piața Operei și Piața Victor Babeș sunt complet diferite iar din Piața Operei se poate face stânga direct în Splai păstrând categoria de drum
mueschel (2026-03-30 10:03:03+00:00): Hi,
do you have a photo of one of the socket:multi you added recently? 
I'd like to see them, because Nema-5 and Schuko should be physically incompatible with each other with respect to their outer dimensions.
Veteraharv (2026-03-30 12:02:51+00:00): Hi mueschel!

In my socket:multi:type=* edits, if a socket has a sad face with two types of eyes — two circles (for European Schuko) and a = (90-degree rotated equals sign) — then I mark that as socket:multi:type=nema_5_15;schuko because you can plug in both the typical Filipino plug (NEMA 1-15 or 5-15 with ground) and the European plug we get from imported electronics (Schuko).

(If there is no ground, but it's otherwise a combined = and : then I tagged those with nema_1_15;schuko.)

I don't have a personal photo with me, but right on the WP page is this one:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Thai_socket.jpg

...which is exactly what I've been tagging as socket:multi:type=nema_5_15;schuko
Veteraharv (2026-03-30 12:05:55+00:00): Meanwhile, the ones I've tagged socket:multi:type=nema_1_15;schuko which so far I've only seen in this cafe, are identically looking but without the receptacle for the ground pin.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Electricity.outlet.peru.JPG
mueschel (2026-03-30 12:23:23+00:00): Hi,
thanks for the images!
These sockets are not for Schuko - these must be recessed with ground contacts on the sides. These are socket:typec, also named "Euro plug".  
Technically, Schuko fits there, but without grounding you're at a high risk of malfunction or electric shocks.
Veteraharv (2026-03-30 13:42:43+00:00): Thanks, I'll keep that in mind.

Although I do want to take note that right now, neither socket:typec=* nor any variation of the more technical names "CEE 7/1" and "CEE 7/2" appear on either the socket:*=* wiki page or on Taginfo — see: [socket:cee*](https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=socket%3Acee) and [socket:typec](https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=socket%3Atypec)
mueschel (2026-03-30 14:01:32+00:00): That's right. Thanks for adding it.

These sockets are very rare apart from some cheap domestic power strips. 
I've never seen such an outlet like in the picture you added...

Devices with this plug are plenty, but sockets are almost exclusively with grounding pins in the various compatible forms.
eggie (2026-03-26 08:51:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
osmviborg (2026-03-26 07:53:24+00:00): access=yes betyder alle. Må motorcykler også parkere på stedet?
ballerup-kommune (2026-03-26 08:23:08+00:00): ja vedr. motorcykler må parkerer der - "I færdselsloven har motorcykler og biler siden 2014 været ligestillet, hvad parkering angår. Det betyder, at motorcykler skal parkere i almindelige p-båse på lige fod med biler (i områder med parkeringsbåse). " - De steder i Ballerup hvor kommunen har lavet specielle MC båse vil de blive indtegnet som parkering_space=motorcycle
osmviborg (2026-03-26 08:59:36+00:00): Jeg er klar over det. Min pointe var at 'access=yes' skal bruges med omtanke. Principielt giver du her tilladelse til ladcykler etc. Det ses ind imellem at highway=* tagges med 'access=yes' hvilket åbner en ladeport.
ballerup-kommune (2026-03-26 09:16:32+00:00): Lovligt indrettede el-ladcykler i Danmark betragtes juridisk som cykler, ikke motoriseret trafik (som knallerter/biler),  og da Wiki siger Use amenity=parking to tag a facility used by the public, customers, or other authorised users for parking motor vehicles," - Så ladcykler kan da ikke per default parkereres - her med mindre man angiver det i et tag at der er tilladt
TheSwavu (2026-03-27 23:29:29+00:00): Hi,

Just to let you know everything beyond addr:street is optional and you don't have to add them https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Addresses

If you do add a addr:suburb then please note that everything to the north of Victoria Street is in Carlton and not Melbourne.

I have fixed all of these.

Thanks.
NeisBot (2026-03-26 08:12:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1360316401 v5 | 7 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/12592727314 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180441414
iandees (2026-03-26 12:40:41+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12592737216 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180452138, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Syl (2026-03-26 14:44:27+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé à nouveau la modification du contour. Le tracé des immeubles se base sur leur emprise au sol et le tracé précédent était le bon comme on peut le voir sur les images aériennes.
Mevess (2026-03-26 17:38:24+00:00): revert dans 180466111
Riteshpatil7 (2026-03-26 08:55:09+00:00): ok
Udarian (2026-03-29 21:19:50+00:00): As with your previous changeset the same applies:
 - Next time please leave a changeset comment that better describes what you did in the changeset, for more info see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
- this changeset also adds duplicate information as facebook=*, instagram=*, linkedin=* are already tagged through contact:facebook=* etc

this time you also removed the height from the building that this business is attached to, next time please don't. 

Happy mapping,
Udar.
Riteshpatil7 (2026-03-26 08:54:49+00:00): ok
NeisBot (2026-03-26 09:00:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13681179288 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Chiropractic clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-03 10:33:05+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180804575
(Delete spam tags. First version)
HellMap (2026-03-26 10:01:44+00:00): I think the entrance node to the building should not be on the way itself, but rather on an offshoot of the way. Currently, navigating along the way implies using the entrance. Kind of like https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier#How_to_map_barrier_nodes
markalex- (2026-03-26 10:33:43+00:00): Fair point. I didn't know how/where to connect east path, and thought that it's probably only intended as a path to this house. But I see how in total it looks strange.
I disconnected it from entrance, and connected to west path directly.
citrula (2026-03-26 19:12:46+00:00): Hi Anton, since there's no physical separation between the lanes at this location this seems like the best way to represent this intersection. It also breaks routing for those trying to turn left out of the parking lot onto Wells Branch.
Anton Valodzin (2026-03-27 06:40:35+00:00): Hi, Citrula! Thank you for your comment. 
According to Mapbox-owned telemetry data and licensed imagery, this intersection has been rebuilt and now has a physical barrier - bollards, so drivers cannot turn left from the parking lot. We have updated the geometry to provide the most accurate information about the road network at this intersection.
Best, Anton Valodzin
citrula (2026-03-27 17:58:56+00:00): thanks for your response. I checked the Mapbox satellite layer, but I guess you may have more updated imagery sources than are available in the editor!
NeisBot (2026-03-26 09:06:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13681161242 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Health center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-03 10:33:07+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180804576
(Delete spam tags. First version)
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-26 08:25:11+00:00): Removed additional SEO spam tags (e.g. wikidata=*, wikipedia=*, image=*) and fix other invalid tag syntax (e.g. opening_hours=*) in changeset 183193531

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183193531
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-30 00:51:16+00:00): DWG revert - apparent SEO spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183379012
007Transformer (2026-03-31 09:17:29+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180663051
Paxxy (2026-03-26 10:14:06+00:00): Good Edit
arjunaraoc (2026-03-27 01:33:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180443787
Frans S (2026-03-26 10:11:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
I have my doubts that the objects you've mapped are huts. I cannot find any proof on other imageries such as Bing, Mapbox and G earth. 
I cannot find any proof of human activities like paths and trodden ground.
 I removed these mappings.
Best regards
Warin61 (2026-03-30 00:30:01+00:00): The order of stops need to be combined with the platforms... 
The stop coms first then it's associated platform .. then the next in sequence stop/platform pair or single. 
See https://osmand.net/blog/guideline-pt/
Warin61 (2026-03-30 00:31:01+00:00): Opps 
"The stop comEs first then it's associated platform "
fortera_au (2026-03-26 22:03:10+00:00): Hi, you've created a multipolygon with a single member, you should just move the landuse and name tags to the way.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180444996
user_1344 (2026-03-26 11:34:31+00:00): I edited this to correct the full situation last night on the computer, which is far easier, and what I shall do in the future. Anything that doesn't appear in SC I shall do on the computer.
SomeoneElse (2026-03-26 11:38:03+00:00): Thanks!  That's what I do too.
Warin61 (2026-04-14 23:41:59+00:00): Platforms removed from relation 16305117 - incorrect order.
Aethonatic (2026-03-26 20:41:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87448531 Could you elaborate on what's here other than "tarmac where a lovely lawn once stood"? Is a bus station actually located here or something else? Also, please refrain from using name=* for descriptions, and especially not to vent your frustrations.
danielm (2026-03-26 23:04:50+00:00): It is just tarmac in front of the 1928 block, where generations played. See https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/council-carried-out-unauthorised-work-32285227 for Carmarthenshire County Council's own lack of planning consent before the works began, and pictures of the devastation. Work still wasn't complete for pupils in the autumn term, well into the frosts. The Council's own planning application portal (PL/09110 2025-03-21) is still showing it as "Not Yet Decided", using the Location name Amman Valley Comprehensive School; as named 1970-~1993, before YDA/AVS until 2011 change to YDA. The application is titled "Provision of a surfaced bus park to alleviate congestion and provide safe access and egress to Amman Valley Comprehensive School"
Aethonatic (2026-03-27 00:14:44+00:00): Thank you, I've adjusted the tags based on the information given. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180480283
trial (2026-03-27 21:39:34+00:00): Salut,
Pourquoi ne pas avoir mis l'ancien nom dans old_name ? Pourquoi avoir laissé comme source du nom... l'ancien nom ?
Taya_S (2026-03-27 08:30:02+00:00): Please explain how you managed to survey all these places. And please also respond to the other changeset comments you have received
SedemOSM (2026-03-27 08:34:44+00:00): I used different devices to make my research
Taya_S (2026-03-27 08:40:20+00:00): Please note that StreetComplete is intended for actual in-person surveys, for places and things you have personal knowledge about. It is not intended for things researched over the internet.
SedemOSM (2026-03-27 08:48:00+00:00): Okay
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-18 08:33:03+00:00): Revert changeset 180446837 which added a SEO POI with several malformed tags (name=*, opening_hours=*, wikidata=*, etc) and added apparent housenumbers to a highway name=*, in changeset 184259932

https://osm.org/changeset/184259932
Filip009 (2026-05-26 08:23:34+00:00): Zdravím, jedná sa o značenú cyklotrasu schválenú návštevným poriadkom Národného parku Nízke Tatry? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20377727
Wildsharky (2026-04-01 14:48:15+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180577572
silversurfer83 (2026-03-26 21:31:48+00:00): Hi :)

Eine Baumreihe ist kein Wald. Bitte mach aus den Flächen eine Linie. Danke.

(wenn es andere vorher auch so gemappt haben, macht es das nicht besser)

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180447887
NeisBot (2026-03-26 11:12:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 56 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/18981050 v14 | 20 crossings
https://osm.org/way/107937447 v6 | 18 crossings
https://osm.org/way/874416595 v3 | 18 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1239456751 v5

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180448375
iandees (2026-03-26 12:40:54+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1239456751 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180452152, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
MappingMore (2026-03-27 12:38:22+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180500437
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-27 13:11:26+00:00): Thanks @MappingMore 👍
NeisBot (2026-03-26 11:12:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11757883338 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Accounting office"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i fakticzna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Biuro rachunkowe"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-03 16:33:14+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180821399
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Patr1k_P (2026-03-28 12:48:21+00:00): preco si zmenil nazov ulice na Andreja Hlinku?
anirud (2026-03-28 21:40:02+00:00): Podľa https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sk:N%C3%A1zvy_ul%C3%ADc majú byť skrátené názvy rozpísané. Ale teraz som si uvedomil, že neviem, či ide o Andreja alebo Antona Hlinku... Preverím na OÚ Báhoň.
Patr1k_P (2026-03-29 17:25:03+00:00): a cital si aj tuto vetu ktora je na konci? 
"Pri určovaní správnej formy je rozhodujúca tabuľka s názvom ulice, prípadne menný zoznam od mestského/obecného úradu."

kedze mapujeme realitu, ako vies ze tam neni realne tabula s nazvom ako predtym? a vyzera ze tam aj je 

https://lnk.sk/cqsm2

...okrem toho aj na ZBGIS to je spravne, ja to urcujem podla toho a aj vo VZN je to tak 

https://bahon.sk/data/advertisement/bahon.sk/456219/173442_1743154677-vzn-c-2-2022-o-oznacovani-ulic.pdf
anirud (2026-03-30 10:07:52+00:00): Dal som otázku na fórum, potom opravím.
https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/wJkktapYXf8/m/TepNCReAAwAJ
Dodko (2026-03-31 07:30:48+00:00): Prečo je vymazané addr:housenumber ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/967933964/history
anirud (2026-04-01 08:22:04+00:00): Asi omylom...
Ale aj tak som rozmýšľal, či označovať adresou budovy, ktoré majú súpisné, ale nie orientačné číslo, v obciach, kde orientačné čísla sú. Sú to rôzne garáže, vedľajšie budovy, a často aj budovy ďaleko od cesty, ako je táto. Nebolo by lepšie na tejto budove odstrániť celú adresu, hoci číslo je v registri adries?