piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
qstep (2026-04-13 16:02:17+00:00): Szia! A w1494535087 w1494539355 w1494535084 szakaszok újra létrehozásával (vagyis elődjeik törlésével) eltörtél rengeteg útvonal kapcsolatot. Kérlek, figyelj oda legközelebb jobban. Lehetőleg ne hozz létre már meglévő szakaszt újra, mert új elemként elveszik a change history.

A JOSM feltöltés előtt szól, ha törött útvonal kapcsolatot talál.

Javítottam: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181283175

További jó térképezést!
FajrAl (2026-04-03 15:30:59+00:00): Harap diperhatikan lagi. Tidak perlu tag bridge=aqueduct dan tag layer=1.
olo81 (2026-05-31 15:17:09+00:00): nazwa opisowa do poprawy 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/686285498
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
C2oc4 (2026-06-14 06:20:02+00:00): oki
C2oc4 (2026-06-14 06:20:17+00:00): to jak będę widział gdzieś swoje inne dodania nazw to zmienie
user-3965077544 (2026-04-10 09:24:59+00:00): Bonjour, cette C.Box vélo a été déplacée ?

Comme emplacement j'avais 45.751005, 3.088312

https://www.beaumont63.fr/la-c-boxvelo-est-arrivee-a-beaumont

https://portail.larucheavelos.fr/clermont_auvergne_metropole
Pmz (2026-04-11 19:02:28+00:00): Bonjour, effectivement avant les élections municipales, le marquage au sol des alentours a été refait et la box a été déplacée côté afpa, a côté de leur portail.
user-3965077544 (2026-04-15 04:42:16+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour le retour et pour la mise à jour, c'est donc le site C.Box Vélo qui n'est plus à jour ! Bonne journée.
Pmz (2026-04-28 07:49:03+00:00): Bonjour, la box a été replacée à son environnement d'origine. Peut-être qu'il s'agissait d'une mesure temporaire liée à la fête des cornards.
user-3965077544 (2026-05-02 04:32:10+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour l'info et la correction dans OSM ! Bon week-end.
NeisBot (2026-03-31 08:33:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13694689660 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Insurance office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-08 10:33:17+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181041560
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Cayenne17 (2026-04-07 18:54:52+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez supprimer le bâtiment. Est-ce qu'il a été détruit ?

Si oui, je ne recommande pas de le supprimer car quelqu'un d'autre qui passe par là risque de le remettre car il est sur l'Ortho HR 2023, PCRS raster 2021, cadastre vectoriel. Si il est supprimer, je recommande plutôt de le passe en `demolished:building=yes`.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180661123
Cayenne17 (2026-04-07 18:55:43+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180661123
Jardineur (2026-04-11 16:55:06+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai effectivement fait une boulette. J'ai remis le bâtiment en place avec une demande de vérification.
Le bâtiment appartient à la commune de Niort (selon les infos disponibles). Le RdC était le bureau de Poste. L'étage est d'habitation. Il s'agit donc d'un bâtiment d'usage mixte : je n'ai pas trouvé d'identification pour cela. J'ai porté ces informations dans le champs "Description"
addr:city=Niortaddr:housenumber=132
addr:postcode=79000
addr:street=Route de Coulonges
building=residential
building:levels=1
description="RdC : Anciennement Bureau de Poste\nÉtage : Habitation (Bailleur = Commune de Niort)"

J'ai laissé la "Boite aux lettres" mais je crois bien qu'elle a disparu.

Sergio
Mannivu (2026-03-31 20:13:48+00:00): Ciao, grazie per la modifica. Ti faccio solo notare che in Italia l'indirizzo non va messo sui poligoni degli edifici, ma si nodo in corrispondenza di ingressi o accesso (vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses#Regole_specifiche_per_l'Italia).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180661257
SomeoneElse (2026-04-06 14:40:57+00:00): As mentioned in https://osm.org/changeset/173662814 , it looks like you're still joining landuse to ways again.  It really isn't the preferred way of doing things (it's even on the "first level of the #questionableedits iceberg" - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/the-questionable-edits-osm-iceberg/142781 .
This is based on looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20394070/history#map=14/61.95808/21.81719 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493480918/history#map=19/61.958997/21.805064 .
hakaka (2026-04-07 09:12:18+00:00): Only a few joinings of landuse to ways and only to minor roads. These hardly cause any problems for later editing.
I do not always join landuse to ways as shown  in this example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1490522628/history#map=17/61.902545/22.007611 and this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1490601024/history#map=18/61.897902/22.041255.
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 10:33:26+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
Tronnn (2026-03-31 10:37:55+00:00): Then it is local knowledge, as it is referred to as such
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-31 10:49:10+00:00): Hallo,

danke für die Antwort. Wenn es wirklich local knowledge ist, besser nicht G* als "Quelle" indirekt im Kommentar und auch als Hashtag angeben bzw. in einem Changeset erwähnen.

Viele Grüße
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 10:33:28+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
大山かなめ (2026-04-03 05:59:32+00:00): このコメントを書き残さなければならないことを、とても残念に思います。
こちらの編集は、以前にディスカッションやメッセージでお伝えした問題行為の「三度目」に該当します。
・他者が反映した新しい情報を古いものに戻すこと
・その一環として、地物のタグを確認せず雑に付け替えること
（https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1245212280 において、building=yesとdemolished:building=yesが併存しています）
あなたがこの変更セットで建物を追加するなどした地域は、ベイシアタウン新狭山の開発地です（参考：https://www.beisia.co.jp/news/%E6%96%B0%E3%83%95%E3%82%A9%E3%83%BC%E3%83%9E%E3%83%83%E3%83%881%E5%8F%B7%E5%BA%97%E3%81%A8%E3%81%AA%E3%82%8B%E3%80%8Cbeisia-town-%E6%96%B0%E7%8B%AD%E5%B1%B1%E5%BA%97%E3%80%8D3%E6%9C%8825%E6%97%A5 ）。
Bing画像の時点で存在した一連の建物は、現存していません。
もちろん、地域の出店に関するニュースを知っていないことは誰にでもあり得ることですが、加えて、Esriの航空写真を用いてもすでに更地化されていることを確認できます。容易に参照できる情報を適切に使用しなかった点は「誰にでも」の規範より重大でしょう
Wildsharky (2026-04-03 06:06:07+00:00):  Reverted in changeset id:180758807
NeisBot (2026-03-31 08:54:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13694788755 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dental office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-08 10:33:20+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181041563
(Delete spam tags. First version)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-02 00:07:23+00:00): Reverted addition of SEO spam POI with mostly promotional or nonsensical tagging/values

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183522781
lankapuhelin (2026-07-27 02:48:49+00:00): Olet jälleen poistanut asiallisia fixme-tageja tekemättä niissä kuvattuja tarpeellisia muutoksia (tässä tapauksessa resurvey). Miksi? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1161065817/history
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 10:33:29+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 10:33:31+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
ajmat (2026-04-01 07:04:17+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 180704056
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 10:33:33+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 10:33:35+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 10:33:37+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
seasack (2026-03-31 09:08:37+00:00): The beach is in front of the HAPIMAG hotel, but accessible via the road. And, as far as I know, all beaches in Greece have to have public access, but I am not sure about it.
Taya_S (2026-03-31 09:14:14+00:00): The following changesets have been reverted:
180654049, 180652116, 180652097, 180652091, 180652090, 180652089, 180652083, 180652082, 180652077, 180652074, 180652070, 180652063, 180652057, 180652056, 180652053, 180652050, 180652047, 180652046, 180652044, 180652042, 180652037, 180652036, 180652032, 180652031, 180652028, 180652024, 180652021, 180652017, 180652016, 180652013, 180652009, 180652003, 180652002, 180652001, 180651999, 180651995, 180651991, 180651990, 180651989, 180651984, 180651982, 180651981, 180651978, 180651972, 180651967, 180651965, 180651962, 180651956, 180651950, 180651947, 180651943, 180651941, 180651937, 180651934, 180651926, 180651922, 180651920, 180651912, 180651907, 180651904, 180651900, 180651893, 180651852, 180651848, 180651838, 180651832, 180651830, 180651829, 180651825, 180651820, 180651818, 180651815, 180651810, 180651806, 180651803, 180651797, 180651789, 180651783, 180651777, 180651767, 180651750, 180651739, 180651734, 180651723, 180651719, 180651715, 180651639, 180651628, 180651623, 180651616, 180651605, 180651599, 180651598, 180650906, 180650899, 180650895, 180650889, 180650877, 180650863, 180650098, 180649833, 180649707, 180649484, 180649429, 180648998, 180648821, 180648707, 180648636, 180648590, 180648503, 180648389, 180648381, 180648374, 180648367, 180648362, 180648353, 180648350, 180648345, 180648333, 180644422, 180644418, 180644406, 180644398, 180644389, 180644383, 180644369, 180644363, 180614198, 180614182, 180614153, 180614132, 180614119, 180614098, 180614086, 180614080, 180614069, 180614058, 180614050, 180614042, 180614038, 180614013, 180614006, 180613994, 180613983, 180613931, 180613930, 180613909, 180613861, 180613851, 180613844, 180613835, 180613829, 180613823, 180613813, 180613729, 180613675, 180613666, 180613662, 180613652, 180613643, 180613635, 180612182, 180611984, 180611841, 180611832, 180611823, 180611729, 180611620, 180611604, 180611465, 180587715, 180587048, 180586895, 180586610, 180562234, 180562219, 180560990, 180527456, 180527417, 180523046, 180523022, 180522939, 180522903, 180522674, 180522571, 180522533, 180522515, 180522406, 180522037, 180483681
felipeeugenio (2026-03-31 11:54:47+00:00): That is a service. And please use the access tags to both the road and the barrier.

regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180662934
OrdosDesert (2026-04-01 15:58:56+00:00): Hi felipeeugenio,
Thank you for reaching out, I will keep that in mind and defer to your edits.
MooseheadLake (2026-04-01 15:59:33+00:00): Hi felipeeugenio, 
Thank you for reaching out. I will be sure to tag roads to single residences as service in the future. Thanks for making the updates here!
felipeeugenio (2026-04-01 18:03:51+00:00): Hello. Thanks for the attitude.
Whatever you need, you can contact me.
also, don´t forget the service=driveway tag if needed.
regards
felipeeugenio (2026-04-01 18:04:23+00:00): Hello. Thanks for the attitude.
Whatever you need, you can contact me.
also, don´t forget the service=driveway tag if needed.
regards
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-04-15 14:15:24+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن شخصية وخاصة للخريطة
felipeeugenio (2026-03-31 11:53:01+00:00): Hello. Please add the access tags (to the gate and the segment of the road inside the gate) they are obviously private.

regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180663031
RiverDeel (2026-04-01 15:58:07+00:00): Hello felipeeugenio. I see that you’ve already added access=private tagging to (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13694842035) and (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1494544858). I appreciate your feedback and will be more aware of adding these tags in the future.
felipeeugenio (2026-04-01 18:03:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for the attitude.
Whatever you need, you can contact me.
eggie (2026-03-31 10:34:45+00:00): Dag AvN  Je vraagt feedback. Lastig te zeggen. Welk bord staat er vooraan?
De combinatie mofa		yes
moped		yes met
motor_vehicle	no	is correct als er een C 12 bord Verboden voor motorvoertuigen vooraan staat. 

MVG
eggie
AvNVRZL (2026-03-31 11:35:28+00:00): hi Eggie,

het betreft een c12 met onderbord "uitgezonder bestemmingsverkeer' 

dank voor het meekijken!
groet
eggie (2026-03-31 11:39:23+00:00): Oke.. maar dan kun je beter motor_vehicle=destination taggen als er een onderbord staat.
Gr eggie
AvNVRZL (2026-03-31 11:43:40+00:00): helder, dit heb ik nu toegevoegd- dank voor het meekijken!
aselvadeasfalto (2026-04-02 17:33:32+00:00): Olá, Jimiiee.

Just wanted to point out that the grassy areas you mapped in Alta de Lisboa would be better tagged with "natural=grassland" rather than "landuse=grass", as these areas are not maintained garden lawns but rather greenfields awaiting development, where herbaceous plants spontaneously grow in the meantime. This is one such case of "tagging for the renderer" [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer].

That said, it would have been even better mapping practice to simply tag the pre-existing "landuse=greenfield" polygons in that area with "natural=grassland" [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element].

Good job mapping out several blank spots in Lisbon recently, nevertheless.

Best,
Selva
Kovoschiz (2026-04-01 08:03:06+00:00): Please don't delete it, as it contains an address. Change to ` was:amenity= ` ` disused:amenity= ` / ` abandoned:amenity= `
kingkingHK (2026-05-21 11:55:12+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182972344
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-04-15 13:54:40+00:00): نرجوا عدم التغيير على أي حدود إدارية بدون مصدر معتبر، وعليه تم عكس هذه التغييرات
Ksa2030 (2026-04-15 23:16:39+00:00): تم تغير من قوقل وهنا مأتم تحديثه يمكن تشوفه بقوقل تم تغير الحدود الاداريه
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-04-16 03:33:56+00:00): قوقل ليس مصدر بيانات مفتوح المصدر ويحظر الرجوع إليه في أي تعديل هنا، كما أن الحدود الإدارية مصدرها البيانات الحكومية وليس عبر قوقل!
Anas masuris (2026-03-31 17:34:24+00:00): Jedna uwaga -> oprócz zmiany railway=* na disused, należy skorygować pozostałe tagi tj. construction=rail na disused=rail, construction:gauge=1435 na gauge=1435 etc.
intransan123 (2026-03-31 18:03:01+00:00): A byłbyś w stanie to zrobić? Mam mało czasu niestety
Anas masuris (2026-03-31 18:06:08+00:00): Jeden raz tak, na przyszłość takie zmiany rób dokładniej
intransan123 (2026-03-31 19:02:06+00:00): Sorry, to się nie powtórzy
Anas masuris (2026-03-31 19:04:00+00:00): Nie no luz xd Na przyszłość tylko proszę, żebyś pamiętał :) W razie czego służę pomocą
Andrew Chadwick (2026-03-31 15:36:53+00:00): Please do not set loc_name, name, and official name all to the same thing. They are not the same concept, and setting these names to the same thing is always the wrong thing to do.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_keys
micheleOSM3 (2026-03-31 15:53:57+00:00): Ciao, vedo che sei nuovo, sai cosa sono le relation? La tua modifica ha rotto questa relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13855736
Ti serve una mano?
NeisBot (2026-03-31 10:06:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13694886351 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Law office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-08 10:33:24+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181041570
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
qstep (2026-04-12 18:32:35+00:00): Szia! Ennek a szakasznak a módosításával eltörtél néhány útvonalkapcsolatot: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1494555219

Javítottam itt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181244480
NeisBot (2026-03-31 10:15:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/2325333939 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Carnicería artesanal"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Carnicería artesanal"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-08 10:33:27+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180666083
patadune (2026-03-31 12:09:22+00:00): Bonjour Lucas, merci pour ta contribution, cependant je ne suis pas sur qu'il soit correct de tagger toute la promenade comme cycleway, certaines parties étant toujours partagées avec les piétons ?
Lucas_smn (2026-03-31 12:15:45+00:00): Oui je suis d'accord avec vous, certaines parties sont bien distingués mais d'autres n'aurait pas du être mis seulement en cyclables
Lucas_smn (2026-03-31 12:30:47+00:00): J'ai modifier mes modification, cette fois c'est bon.
intransan123 (2026-03-31 10:20:31+00:00): Plus jeśli zmiana się przyjmie, to można rozważyć nawet degradację starej DK1 do kategorii primary.
Kamil Kalata (2026-03-31 11:03:06+00:00): Witaj, @intransan123!
Zmiana, której dokonałeś, jest niezgodna z zasadą podaną na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce, wedle której powinieneś był wcześniej ją przedyskutować na OSM Community. Zostanie więc ona wycofana.
dzamper (2026-03-31 11:10:09+00:00): @Kamil Kalata o czym mówisz?

Przecież ta zmiana była na forum OSM Community „przedyskutowana” (tzn. nie było sprzeciwu):
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kategorie-drog/57996/596

Za to zgodnie z zasadami podanymi na
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Change_rollback
powinieneś przed wycofaniem zmian poczekać na odpowiedź adresata trochę dłużej niż 1 minutę…

Z rewertera powinno się korzystać w ostateczności, a nie radośnie…
intransan123 (2026-03-31 11:44:19+00:00): Cześć @Kamil Kalata.
Nie obraź się, ale nie uważam, żeby ta zmiana nie była przedyskutowana. Podobna zmiana kategorii dróg została już zaproponowana na forum społeczności(https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kategorie-drog/57996/596) przez jednego z doświadczonych użytkowników OSM i przez 6 dni nie spotkała się dotąd ze sprzeciwem, a nawet dostała 2 łapki w górę. Postanowiłem więc, że spróbuję dodać tą zmianę na mapę i zobaczę reakcję. Jeśli się komuś nie podobało, można było prowadzić dyskusję pod zestawem zmian, a nie od razu revert'ować edycję.
Kamil Kalata (2026-03-31 12:05:09+00:00): Głęboko przepraszam za swoją impulsywną cofkę. W temacie wątku na OSM Community, po prostu o niej zapomniałem, a pamiętałem tylko o tym, że ten temat został wspomniany na serwerze Discord "OSM Polska"; nie uważam tego jednak za wymówkę.
Vinber-Pro (2026-03-31 10:30:43+00:00): Peut-être peux-tu préciser ce que tu as fait
Justine-CMV (2026-03-31 12:30:08+00:00): j'ai testé
Vinber-Pro (2026-03-31 12:31:35+00:00): mais qu'as tu ajouté :)