piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
amakarevich_lyft (2023-03-21 12:30:03+00:00): Hi, TheAdventurer64

My name is Artem, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Many thanks, we really appreciate your willingness to help. And we will use your offer in case additional information is needed. At this moment I have already added all the necessary map features for this terminal in scope of the project. Please feel free to correct our edits or point out any inaccuracies to us to fix.


Best regards, Artem
Frans S (2023-02-20 12:40:58+00:00): Hello . Thanks for mapping on this task.
There is no need to map tracks. See the note about it on the instructions.
Best regards
mavl (2023-02-22 06:11:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 132861607 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132745862].
Luca Moiana (2023-02-21 08:44:01+00:00): Ciao, 
perché hai modificato dei dati che sono stati importati dalla banca dati regionale?
Con le tue modifiche, si sono create way parallele che non sembrano avere senso. Potresti spiegarmi cosa stai cercando di aggiustare?
grazie
Luca
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
b-holdet (2023-07-18 04:58:52+00:00): Din meget restriktive access=no er blevet opdateret til access=private på markvejen og access=destination på indkørslen.
access=no give ingen adgang, heller ikke hvis til fods.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dno

Vær varsom med at benytte dette tag, og se om ikke en af de andre restriktioner kan gælde i stedet.
Frans S (2023-03-04 14:40:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
Well mapped.
Did you not read the note about mapping/tagging of tracks? See the description.
gscholz (2023-02-21 07:43:07+00:00): Hi Evarist Isdory_ImportAccount,
obviously there have been some import activities in your region which resulted in several errors regarding not connected ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=34.43354&lat=-1.38043&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

As you may know, this kind of errors irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Evarist Isdory_ImportAccount (2023-02-21 09:21:17+00:00): Thank you for letting me know about the issue, i think it was because of conflict resolution that occured during the mapping process.

I have arleady fixed it.

Many thanks,
Evarist Isdory
notmyproblem1 (2025-06-01 17:59:01+00:00): si è sicuri del blocco nella strada di servizio "Via Barberinese"?
silversurfer83 (2023-02-23 09:57:21+00:00): Moin :)
Du kannst in so einem Fall auch einfach das schon bestehende Gebäude drehen und an die aktuelle Situation anpassen. Ohne das Gebäude zu löschen.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132789932
wies1 (2023-02-23 15:01:02+00:00): Hallo,
das hatte ich auch vor, nur habe ich das nicht hinbekommen. Daher habe ich es dann eben neu gemacht.
Viele Grüße
wies1
Jbah (2024-02-09 16:48:45+00:00): Hi, du hast bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31903350 das bicycle=yes zu designated geandert. Wie kommt's?
Vor Ort ist Gehweg, Radfahrer frei ausgeschildert, welches nach https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren bicycle=yes sein sollte?
LG
wahu (2024-02-10 12:25:19+00:00): Hi, danke für den Hinweis! Ich vermute dass ich hier Streetcomplete falsch benutzt habe. Der Kontext ist https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/4669 nach einer schnellen Recherche. Ich werde genauer nachschauen, ob ich nicht noch mehr Wege verschlimmbessert hab.
Gerade kann ich nicht vor Ort nachschauen und hab auch keinen Zugriff auf nen ordentlichen Rechner, also besser diesen Weg gerne aus. Danke
Jbah (2024-02-10 12:50:00+00:00): Hab das github issue mit schnellen Ueberfliegen so gut wie nicht verstanden, aber macht ja nichts :D
Hab die 2 Wege wo ich gestern langgekommen bin und hier im Changeset sind entsprechend angepasst
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-20 13:10:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536692769

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2023-03-01 10:50:10+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
Mahdi Nameghi (2023-02-20 13:51:06+00:00): متاسفانه تغییرات شما به دلیل خرابکاری در نقشه برگشت داده میشود
marczoutendijk (2023-02-24 10:37:10+00:00): The DWG contacted this user (﻿﻿مسیریاب مکان) and the user apologised for their mistakes and promised to edit according the OSM rules.
The block on that user account is now lifted.

DWG با این کاربر (مسیریاب مکان) تماس گرفت و کاربر بابت اشتباهات خود عذرخواهی کرد و قول داد که طبق قوانین OSM ویرایش کند.
بلوک آن حساب کاربری اکنون برداشته شده است.

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
mavl (2023-02-22 06:11:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 132861607 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132745862].
Frans S (2023-02-20 17:04:59+00:00): Thank you for mapping on this task.
Please use the correct tag for roads in urban areas. (residential instead of service.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways#Roads_and_tracks
Best regards and keep mapping
pravemet (2023-02-21 12:00:18+00:00): Hello Frans,
Thank you for reviewing our changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies for incorrect edits. Going forward, we will ensure to not repeat such errors again. Thanks once again for fixing the issue, looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
pravemet
Rémi_ (2023-02-20 13:22:45+00:00): Épuration*
Dimacn (2023-02-21 18:15:44+00:00): Пожалуйста прекратите добавлять на карту несуществующие объекты. Прочитайте пожалуйста текст в красной рамке здесь - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway=proposed?uselang=ru  Вы обсудили ваше массовое копирование несуществующих объектов с сообществом картографов?
eggie (2023-02-20 14:20:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Zal zo even kijken wat je hebt gedaan.  Denk niet iets om mee te beginnen als startende mapper. 
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 	4
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-waterway 	3

Routes kun je  helaas niet aanpassen met een simpele editor als iD. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-02-20 14:38:35+00:00): Ik heb wat verbindingen en losse eindjes weggehaald.
De westelijke brug ingetekend zodat de fietspaden niet meer door het water lopen.
Die oostelijke doorsteek door het water klopt dat wel op die plaats?

https://nieuwesluisterneuzen.eu/nieuws/2023-02/tijdelijke-brug-over-de-nieuwe-sluis
eggie (2023-02-20 14:43:57+00:00): Jammer dat die januari foto een beetje bewolkt is.. Maar wachten op de volgende foto.
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=20-02-2022&loc=51.33321%2C3.821483%2C17z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-01-05&acqid=20230105_110414_SV1-04&sensor=SuperView-1
Dobbymans2021 (2023-02-23 16:54:57+00:00): Hallo Eggie! 
Dank voor het helpen. Het was misschien niet slim om mee te starten als startende mapper idd. Ik zal er voor nu vanaf blijven. Kan ik je anders nog voorzien van informatie? Ik ben direct werkzaam op het project.
Dobbymans2021 (2023-02-23 16:55:48+00:00): Ook de fietsroute is inmiddels verlegd over de tijdelijke route over de sluiskolk. Ik kan ook nog aangeven waar onze werk in-uitritten zetten?
eggie (2023-02-23 18:19:16+00:00): Hoi .. Zal zo even naar die fietsroutes kijken, want die kun je eigenlijk niet aanpassen met editor iD  en is een aparte tak van sport. Dat gaat alleen met editor JOSM
Je hebt nu van de oude route Buitenhaven een highway=service gemaakt. Maar wanneer die weg weer terugkomt kan die beter op highway=construction. Dat geldt ook voor de fietspaden.
Komen die busroutes allemaal weer terug op het oude traject of worden die ook omgeleid over het tijdelijke traject. ? 

Hoe lang gaat die omleiding duren?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-23 18:31:06+00:00): .. en maw kunnen die parallelfietspaden waar nu nog de fietsroutes en wandelroute lopen op highway=construction construction=cycleway?
De routes (routerelaties) zijn wel om te leggen door een ervaren mapper.
eggie (2023-02-23 18:40:00+00:00): Zie nu dat memoenteel een medemapper bezig is met het traject... dus ik blijf er nog even vanaf.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132938843#map=15/51.3283/3.8200&layers=CN

Laat maar even weten hoe het met de 'oude' fietspaden is gesteld. construction? 

Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-02-20 14:01:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-02-20 14:05:38+00:00): Feedback  Elk begin is moeilijk.. Bdter niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dit levert schade op door onbedoelde verplaatsingen Hier ook
Kaapse Baan 2 staat nu ergens anders. Gebouw van vorm veranderd.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132791513

Volgens mij werken we met decimale punten  met de hoogte en niet met komma's.
Gen oneway=no toevoegen aan regulieren wegen svp. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-20 14:10:45+00:00): Kijk even hier hoe de format in elkaar zit. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxheight
eggie (2023-02-20 14:13:03+00:00): Adresnode Kaapse Baan 2 hersteld
eggie (2023-02-20 14:14:17+00:00): Richtlijnen voor hulpdiensten: Veiligheidsdiensten  

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Hulpdiensten
eggie (2023-02-20 14:08:55+00:00): Gebouw Dorpshuisweg hersteld
eggie (2023-02-21 09:04:04+00:00): Hoi..  Je vraagt feedback.. Lijkt me allemaal correct zo.
Foutmelding zuidoost hoek. ...?
Er staat getagd Keuterstraat en de BGT geeft aan Keuterstraatje. 
Josm ziet die fout. 
Vanaf de Rillaerse Baan staat -straatje en de rest straat. Ergens klopt iets dus niet. 
Maar gelijk aangepast.
Mocht het niet kloppen dan hier een terugmelding doen. 
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=131066.61&geometry.y=393290.09&zoomlevel=11.82
MVG
eggie
tttnnn24 (2023-02-21 12:14:29+00:00): Ik weet vrijwel zeker dat het hele traject Keuterstraatje is en dat de Rillaerse Baan zonder streepje moet; dus zoals jij het spelt in deze thread en NIET zoals het in OSM staat. Ik verifieer beide; morgen of zo.
eggie (2023-02-21 14:27:22+00:00): Keuterstraatje heb ik al aangepast aan de BGT data. De Rillaarse-Baan staat wel degelijk met een streepje in de BGT omtrekgericht en ook in BGT/Kadaster Verbeter de kaart. 
Even een dilemma als het straatnaambord wat anders aangeeft.
Dan evt terugmelding doen via Verbeter de kaart.
Er loopt ook ergens een draadje op het forum.. We kennen ook official_name= naast name=

Bv bij straatnamen waar we de voornamen en titels voluit schrijven
tttnnn24 (2023-02-21 15:14:58+00:00): oops, ik begon net zelf een nieuwe thread. Het Keuterstraatje heet echt overal met het verkleinwoord.
tttnnn24 (2023-02-21 15:24:44+00:00): Ha ha, op verbeterdekaart.nl als je inzoomt op de hoofdrijbaan Rillaerse-Baan en net west van de Haya van Somerenstraat  bij een blauwe lijn Rillaerse Baan.
tttnnn24 (2023-02-21 15:29:22+00:00): Ingestuurd...
eggie (2023-02-21 16:16:28+00:00): Nog even anders :)
En dan is er nog een probleem Kadaster geeft aan Rillaerse Baan 5
Zo te zien het enige adres langs deze weg.
Dit schrijf je los van elkaar. 

Die terugmelding kan hier.
Geen idee wat er gebeurt als je ook nog een 'adresmankering' stuurt naar de BAG. 
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=Rillaerse%20Baan&resultOffset=0&detailsObjectId=0855010000079253&objectId=0855200000020229&geometry.x=130278.008&geometry.y=393511.256&zoomlevel=6

De BAG is verplicht om te antwoorden. 

Succes,
eggie
tttnnn24 (2023-02-21 16:30:36+00:00): Dit is een hobby met volop humor ingebakken :) Maar de bewoners van R-B 5 zijn erg ongelukkig over de bouw die daarnaast aan de Rielseweg is voorzien...
wkdgs (2023-02-24 10:35:58+00:00): Hi,

kannst du noch an die entsprechenden Straßen die "sidewalk=*" Tags hinzufügen?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:sidewalk
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132791740
Paul Berry (2025-02-12 10:48:25+00:00): Hi Colin,

I'm guessing the answer's no but does this unparished area have a name?

Regards,
_Paul_
Colin Smale (2025-02-12 10:59:43+00:00): Hi Paul,
Formally, unparished areas don't have a name. They often cover wide areas containing many settlements, making it difficult to imagine a sensible name for the whole area. Sometimes they are created by the abolition of a civil parish, so I guess the name of that could be carried over. But in any case the boundaries of a settlement in the UK are notoriously vague - pick a point between two villages and ask a sample of people "where am I?" and you are unlikely to get a clear consensus unless it's "somewhere between A and B."
Regards, Colin
Paul Berry (2025-02-12 16:01:07+00:00): I'll mark it as noname=yes, if that's OK.
Colin Smale (2025-02-12 16:29:58+00:00): Sounds a bit redundant, tbh. A bit like "this page intentionally left blank (apart from this text, obviously)"
RicoElectrico (2023-02-20 16:09:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3559377
Jakka (2023-02-20 19:00:06+00:00): Het is niet nodig om nogmaals de name:nl te gebruiken
want hoofdnaam is dezelfde ;)
SomeoneElse2 (2023-03-26 00:38:59+00:00): Hello,
I think something's gone a bit wrong on the wikidata side of things: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q116774792&action=history .  I've changed "promotory" to "promontory" in OSM, but wikidata still has it in the item description.
Cheers,
Andy
b-unicycling (2023-03-26 13:49:42+00:00): fixed, thanks
Crsi (2023-02-20 14:47:29+00:00): Thanks for review, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132794720 for an update
Dawid2849 (2023-05-11 22:00:52+00:00): What's the point of this changeset? "Poland, small change" is not the best comment of changeset, which covers whole Poland
Dawid2849 (2023-05-11 22:03:41+00:00): I see that you changed „ ” to " ", why?
eggie (2023-02-20 15:00:17+00:00): Je kunt een portaal als height_restrictor toevoegen op ee node verbonden met de weg en daar de hoogtebeperking op zetten.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dheight_restrictor

MVG
eggie
map per (2023-02-22 10:56:07+00:00): Wegen "Meine Änderungen überprüfen": Sieht alles gut aus, danke!
merylstreet (2023-02-21 16:33:06+00:00): Hello Snusmumriken, amazing amount of work you're doing ;)
Just quick question, did Dolphin's Coiffure (node 460456796) close down? I checked it in December and looking at facebook it seems still open.
Cheers!
Snusmumriken (2023-02-21 17:04:23+00:00): I do think so. But I can pass by tomorrow to dubblecheck. Sometimes it can be difficult to distinguish a place that just has closed for the day from one that has closed for good
Snusmumriken (2023-02-22 13:09:45+00:00): You were right. I've now fixed it. Thanks for keeping an eye out!
silversurfer83 (2023-02-23 09:31:14+00:00): Hi Bjoern,

even though your account isn't really new your changesets_count says your still pretty new to mapping. In that case let me say hello and welcome :)


you deleted the office of Global City Finance AG in Switzerland, a node which was located within a office building and you added the adress to a building in Schleswig.
You did not give any source for your edit, which would be nice and helpful for other mappers, so I'd like to ask you to cite your source in the future.

To me it would make sense to put my office into an office building, so why did you delete the office? Is it really not located within the building in Switzerland?

And one last thing: Please read this article in the wiki and keep it in mind when editing in the future:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

should you have any questions, please don't hesitate and ask

happy mapping
silversurfer83
Frans S (2023-02-24 12:27:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator,during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. therefore I inform you  about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Each building need to be squared.
Nodes of buildings may not connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132793813
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Frans S (2023-02-21 10:04:10+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
ianlopez1115 (2023-02-20 15:20:23+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
এক সেবা ডিজিটাল সেন্টার (2023-02-20 17:36:57+00:00): সোনাহাট বাজার, ভূরুঙ্গামারী, কুড়িগ্রাম
ianlopez1115 (2023-02-20 15:20:28+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset
Dawid2849 (2023-02-20 16:16:17+00:00): Ten salon jest aktualnie w remoncie, byłem w Stokrotce kilka dni temu.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-20 14:40:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158005376

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
ianlopez1115 (2023-02-20 15:20:32+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
ianlopez1115 (2023-02-20 15:20:39+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
ianlopez1115 (2023-02-20 15:20:45+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Frans S (2023-02-27 15:09:36+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.. 
Please use the correct tag for highways in urban areas. 
See this wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways
Pay attention where to use the tag Service
Best regards