piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
flohoff (2024-01-28 18:09:23+00:00): Moin,
nur weil ich das gerade gesehen habe. Es könnte sinn machen die alle von highway=path zu highway=footway umzutaggen wenn es reine Fußwege sind und Räder eh nicht zulässig.

Flo
flohoff (2024-01-28 18:10:30+00:00): Also erstmal - Willkommen bei OSM - Cool das du mit mappst. 

Osnabrück ist zwar nicht mehr Ostwestfalen aber du bist auch Herzlich zur Ostwestfalen Lippe Mailingliste eingeladen - Nicht viel los aber da kann man man ggfs mal seine Fragen abkippen.

Oder eben im Openstreetmap community Forum ...

Flo
matpie (2024-01-29 19:28:12+00:00): Moin,
danke für die EInladung zur Mailingliste. Ich fange mal gaaanz langsam an und lege meinen Schwerpunkt auf nicht für Fahrräder zugängliche Wege. Diese verhindern nämlich das Erreichen vom 100%-Ziel bei Wandrer ( wandrer.earth ). Daher arbeite ich mich erst einmal daran ab und schwenke ggf. noch auf eine Nachschärfung bei Wegebelägen. Für das ganz tiefe Einsteigen lasse ich mir noch ein wenig Zeit!

Matthias
MxxCon (2024-02-04 05:50:04+00:00): Hello.
What kind of alignment improvement did you do here when you made these buildings misaligned and not rectangular.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146768828
jhaluska80 (2024-02-08 20:32:51+00:00): I aligned it to Bing Aerial.  A lot of the buildings aren't pure rectangles.  Do you have an offset on Bing Aerial or a different imagery?  Feel free to square them if I forgot.
eggie (2024-01-28 09:14:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
empty_child (2024-01-29 09:52:56+00:00): Hello Akita777,
Please, don't use tag forest inside city limits. natural=wood is more applicable
contrapunctus (2024-01-29 08:10:14+00:00): Hey Saurav. It was great to see all your edits yesterday - I think you have the most changesets of all the participants.

Please note that names should use title case - in this case "RS Junior Modern School". You can read more guidelines about names here - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

Keep up the good work! 😃
eggie (2024-01-28 09:15:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-01-28 09:23:32+00:00): Dag Tweerden, 
Vraagje.. Loopt dat fietspad nog steeds apart langs het station of gaat het fietsverkeer over de hoofdrijbaan? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-28 09:46:10+00:00): Het asfalt-fietspad heb ik verwijderd. Dat is er niet (meer)
Fietsroute omgelegd
Tweerden (2024-01-28 13:12:39+00:00): Er loopt geen fietspad. Dat is er ook nooit geweest.

Ik vind het bijzonder opvallend dat allerlei elementen totaal fout zijn aangegeven, eerder.

-Hoogst irritant is de vermelding PARALLELWEG NOORD waar het hele plein Stationsplein is. (Ik zie dat deze wijziging helaas nog niet doorgevoerd is)

Verder; brievenbus stond verkeerd, waterput stond verkeerd.
eggie (2024-01-28 13:55:36+00:00): Dag Tweerden.. Je aan allerlei dingen die verkeerd staan ergeren lijkt me niet aan te bevelen.
OSM is nu eenmaal een opensource gebeuren waar ieder aan kan bijdragen Dat heb jij ook gedaan.
Wanneer je iets wijzigt is het in OSM direct doorgevoerd. 
Het ligt wel aan de kaart waar je naar kijkt. Niet elke layer is even snel. Soms even CTRL-f5 toetsen.
Je cache leegmaken.
MVG
eggie
mcliquid (2024-01-28 17:54:02+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
flohoff (2024-01-28 11:20:40+00:00): Moin,
ich habe den changeset hier reverted. Ist auch nur das 3,4,5te mal oder so das jemand hier vorbeikommt und das mapped.

Macht halt das komplette rendereing kaputt.

Siehe auch

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103956242
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96478754

Die Anschlüsse zu allen taxiways und anderen Flächen sind dann komplett kaputt.

Flo
flohoff (2024-01-28 11:23:38+00:00): Der runway wird dann wie man hier sieht (Noch nicht vollständig) komplett nicht mehr gerendert - die taxiways aber.

https://silicon-verl.de/home/flo/tmp/20240128/Screenshot_from_2024-01-28_12-22-04.png

https://silicon-verl.de/home/flo/tmp/20240128/Screenshot_from_2024-01-28_12-21-55.png
geozeisig (2024-01-29 06:46:29+00:00): Das sich Dinge ändern ist der Lauf der Zeit. Wie das in OSM umgesetzt wird kann man auf der englischen Wiki -Seite unter Lifecycle sehen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Drunway#Lifecycle

Was mir zuerst aufgefallen ist das die runway mit area=yes kartiert wurde. Diese Möglichkeit wurde, diskutier und zu Gunsten von area:aeroway=runway abgeleht.
Vielleicht hilft die das Beispiel TXL:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/52.5587/13.2889
Aber jeder Fall ist ja anders.

Viele Grüße
GeorgeKaplan (2026-01-01 17:00:50+00:00): Bonjour,

Avec vos ajouts, on a maintenant 3 activités de restauration dans le même bâtiment https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/775100500, vous confirmez que ce n'est pas une erreur ?
Cypri67 (2026-01-01 17:56:10+00:00): Bonjour,
Non ce n'est pas une erreur, j'y ai déjà séjourné plusieurs fois. L'établissement est unique, c'est la même entreprise. Mais il y a bien 3 "espaces" différents avec pour chaque un d'entre eux leurs identités et leurs clientèles soit un Hôtel et 2 restaurants de gammes différentes.
Eventuellement « Hôtel Restaurant » Peut-être renommer juste « Hôtel ».
Vous trouverez toutes les infos sur le site https://destination.montchampdufeu.com/fr
Cordialement
mavl (2024-02-23 18:52:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147818131, 147828921 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
rene78 (2024-02-02 09:26:07+00:00): Really? A street stall?
julcnx (2024-04-24 08:06:17+00:00): Hi EAKMOR, thanks for your contributions! Just wondering why you had to change the classifications for these roads ? FYI, living_street is not to be used in Thailand: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Urban_and_Local_Road_wide_enough_for_motor_cars
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146771056
rhtb0 (2024-01-29 13:46:13+00:00): OSM에서는 속성 효력이 없어지더라도 형태가 남아있는 경우 수명주기 머릿말(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:Lifecycle_prefix)을 쓰도록 되어 있어서 일부 태그를 되돌렸습니다.
자세한 것은 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:첫_걸음 등을 참조해 주십시오. 고맙습니다.
rhtb0 (2024-01-29 13:48:31+00:00): https://tiles.osm.kr/#18/37.57500/126.97700
오픈스트리트맵 한국에서는 군부대가 노출되지 않는 지도를 공개하고 있습니다.
Henry572 (2024-01-28 13:33:02+00:00): Hallo Edelsalami,
Laut Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:sport=tennis?uselang=de) sollten die Tennisplätze doch eigentlich einzeln eingezeichnet sein.
Gruß, Hendrik
Edelsalami (2024-01-28 16:41:50+00:00): Hi Henry, danke für den Hinweis. Aus irgendeinem Grund war ich der festen Überzeugung, dass diese anders gemappt werden. Habe meine Änderungen rückgängig gemacht.
Gruß
Henry572 (2024-01-28 17:56:57+00:00): Kein Problem, danke fürs Korrigieren. Wenn ich es richtig sehe, waren in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146771510 auch einige Tennisplätze betroffen. Abgesehen davon aber danke für die ganzen Ergänzungen!
Edelsalami (2024-01-28 18:21:41+00:00): Danke, ich wusste, dass ich das kürzlich noch irgendwo gemacht hatte, aber nicht mehr wo. Ist repariert.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-28 10:00:26+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10582701280

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mavl (2024-02-23 18:51:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147818131, 147828921 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2024-02-23 18:51:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147818131, 147828921 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
soliMM (2024-01-28 10:16:30+00:00): Correct changeset comment: "Added house numbers in Blato"
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-04-16 06:49:00+00:00): 朋友你好，我注意到你把很多道路和河流的交汇处都加上了ford=yes，这意味着这里的路面是涉水路面，意味着您一年四季从这里通过的时候车轮都是沾水的

这合理吗？这不合理

您一定是快速的应用了编辑器在警告中第一项的“涉水路面”，而不是把它应用为自动添加桥梁

https://imgur.com/a/Hnmie4G

望今后注意
GanderPL (2024-06-27 21:29:49+00:00): Informacje opisowe powinny być umieszczane w tagu "description", a inskrypcja w "inscription".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146772608
GanderPL (2024-06-27 21:30:24+00:00): Informacje opisowe powinny być umieszczane w tagu "description", a inskrypcja w "inscription".
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146772924
GanderPL (2024-06-27 21:30:48+00:00): Informacje opisowe powinny być umieszczane w tagu "description", a inskrypcja w "inscription".
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146773057
Glassman (2024-01-31 19:36:54+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

One suggestion. Instead of using a description, tag the function of the building or business. For example The retirement home should be tagged as amenity=social_facility + social_facility=assisted_living. 

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:social_facility for more information.

Please update the tags on the retirement home and dentist. Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146773076
GanderPL (2024-06-27 21:33:11+00:00): Dodaj tag former:amenity=school, który wskazuje, że budynek był kiedyś używany jako szkoła.
Jeśli budynek ma wartość historyczną, rozważ dodanie tagu historic=* z odpowiednią wartością, np. historic=building.
Opcjonalnie, możesz dodać tag start_date=* z datą rozpoczęcia funkcjonowania jako szkoła i end_date=* z datą zakończenia tej funkcji, jeśli te informacje są dostępne.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146773313
GanderPL (2024-06-27 21:33:35+00:00): Informacje opisowe powinny być umieszczane w tagu "description", a inskrypcja w "inscription".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146773373
muchichka_s (2024-01-28 11:01:06+00:00): Пиши нормальні коментарі до наборів змін що робиш, не скасовуй зміни інших користувачів!
pitfire (2024-01-28 12:07:09+00:00): Hallo Pemu,
bitte kein "bicycle=no" nach Gutdünken setzen. Dafür braucht es eine Rechtsverbindliche Beschilderung!
Betr.: Weg: 1243664964
SekeRob (2024-01-28 19:33:09+00:00): Hi,

Whatever you did there are 113 problems your changes have caused

warnings:mismatched_geometry:area_as_line	113

Not Good. Please fix

thanks
Martinligabue (2024-01-28 20:19:30+00:00): the issues were there before, I just readded some missing relationships in the lines, but they are still to fix, as they were before, I don't have the tools to fix this, as for me it fails with "too many nodes on line"
SekeRob (2024-01-28 20:31:09+00:00): Well, you managed to cause the whole park boundary to disappear from the Carto map in zoom up to 1km. The 2km and lower gives the falls impression it's still there but those tiles only update Friday night.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/968853618/history#map=17/42.20553/14.12846

The orange line is one of the boundary element.
Martinligabue (2024-01-28 20:41:51+00:00): I see, how do I fix it? I just selected all the segments that were part of the park and saw that one of them was without the relationship tag, I tought it was deleted by error, and put it back like in all the other segments.
If you can revert it it would be apreciated, as I don't know how  to
SekeRob (2024-01-28 21:30:27+00:00): Unfortunately you did another edit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146773891 after this one affecting the park relation, somehow including the node of Falesia Nusca. When I try to revert, because it has to be sequential, I get a mountain of errors 1 being that members are now tagged twice as boundary, as relation member and as way and a duplicate way. Need to sleep on this first, till then please don't do more edits here.
Martinligabue (2024-01-28 22:23:05+00:00): I understand, I won't touch this anymore and I won't try again to do relationships anymore
BCNorwich (2024-01-28 13:26:49+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The tag for this should be leisure=playground, I've amended it for you. 

Regards Bernard.
Akkurator (2024-02-14 19:32:35+00:00): Hallo ChrisFromRV,

diese Wegstück, das du mit "kein separater Gehweg" gelöscht hast, ist durch Bäume und Parkplätze von der Straße getrennt. Kann man auch auf Luftbildern gut sehen. War also wohl ein Versehen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/764369306/history

Es wäre schön, wenn der Weg wieder zurückkäme.

Grüße,
Akkurator
ChrisFromRV (2024-02-15 04:19:06+00:00): Hi. Erledigt. Wenn noch was is, einfach melden ;)
Sandal man (2024-01-28 13:28:11+00:00): Hello,
Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)
But please make smalle change sets, this helps others in tracking changes. 
Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-15 22:29:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152740214, 152740288, 152740274, 152740234, 152740192, 152740169, 152740167, 152740249, 152740178 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions by Hamilton 44/Delta Evas ALL, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16207
ibanez (2024-01-28 12:12:45+00:00): sorry to bother, but layer=-1 means underearth. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer. "Do not use layer=-1 to hide warnings about crossing or overlapping ways. Either fix them properly or leave the easily visible warning so that others can fix them." Possible approach is to divide the building into the (main) building and projecting roof. If this path is inside the building, the approach is another. Use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:indoor, there is a seperate map for indoor view: https://indoorequal.org/
Kiss_Karoly (2024-01-28 13:51:57+00:00): Minden oda nem illő dolgot még a mai nap folyamán javítok.
WoSoe (2024-01-29 06:23:22+00:00): Servus!

Keine Ahnung was StreetComplete da fragt oder vorschlägt, aber für sidewalk:both=separate (sidewalk=separate) müssten die Bürgersteig als eigenständiger Weg eingetragen sein.

sidewalk:both=yes wäre richtig.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk:both?uselang=de

Ciao WoSoe

PS
Das ist jetzt KEINE Aufforderung wieder alles mit extra Wegen und area:highway=* voll zu pflastern. ;-)
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-28 11:50:49+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11559493968

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Warin61 (2024-01-29 00:42:11+00:00): Hi
Multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments... For more information see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
grzegorzmilosz (2024-01-28 11:49:41+00:00): numeracja drogi przywrócona na podstawie wizji lokalnej: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UyDVxUX_pt0Ts3_GR67vJHe4bFPlWIIU/view?usp=drive_link i mapy dróg powiatowych: http://pzd-olawa.pl/zalaczniki/MapaDrogPowiatowych2020.pdf
mavl (2024-02-23 18:51:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147818131, 147828921 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
GanderPL (2024-06-27 21:34:47+00:00): Informacje opisowe powinny być umieszczane w tagu "description", a inskrypcja w "inscription".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146775539
grzegorzmilosz (2024-01-28 12:06:40+00:00): Numeracja drogi powiatowej przywrócona na podstawie wizyty w terenie: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-3-Ri0hKpSFbqmMwqKTHZ_0U3Hqpr2-r/view?usp=sharing i mapy dróg powiatowych PZD w Oławie: http://pzd-olawa.pl/zalaczniki/MapaDrogPowiatowych2020.pdf i http://pzd-olawa.pl/zalaczniki/MapaDrogOlawy2020.pdf
GanderPL (2024-06-27 21:34:05+00:00): Informacje opisowe powinny być umieszczane w tagu "description", a inskrypcja w "inscription".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146775637
G4rden3r (2024-02-04 17:13:23+00:00): Hi, bitte beachte dass es für den DA Nord keine Freigabe für OSM haben, somit auch nicht als Quelle benutzen dürfen
vg
G4rden3r
mueschel (2024-05-21 12:40:34+00:00): Hi,
could you check the parking on this way? Is it street_side or lane?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7369454
OttoR (2024-05-22 08:59:02+00:00): lane
emersonveenstra (2024-01-28 18:34:04+00:00): Hi there,

Road names shouldn't be abbreviated in OSM, could you please change this to "West 1st Street"? Thanks!
NeisBot (2024-01-29 21:31:03+00:00): Hello Ag mc, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
OttawaHiking (2024-02-03 13:56:15+00:00): The newly mapped roads disconnected from the road system, are they really residential?
philippec (2024-01-28 23:19:55+00:00): mapillary aub
ljc_jlyb (2024-01-28 13:08:13+00:00): changeset注释意义不明
eggie (2024-01-28 13:51:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
feedback Een bedrijf bijtaggen op de nieuwe adresnode is oke, maar het oude adres verwijderen is niet de bedoeling. Dat blijft uiteraard bestaan.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146777616

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-01-28 14:05:41+00:00): Dag Tweerdem In dat geval ook de verwijzingen naar de B&B verwijderen. 
Hier kun je zien wat nog weg kan.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146778328

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-28 14:16:58+00:00): B&B verwijderd
Filip009CZ (2025-01-02 18:50:29+00:00): Zdravím, podľa čoho si dával typ cesty sem https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/132404355?
eggie (2024-01-28 14:07:12+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk Hier heb je per abuis een adresnode verplaatst
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146778580
addr:street	Stationsstraat 78a
eggie (2024-01-28 14:08:50+00:00): Adres hersteld.. Schade kan ontstaan door schuiven met de kaart in editmidus. Zo gaat z'n brievensus ook wel eens aan de wandel. 

gr eggie
eggie (2024-01-28 14:10:13+00:00): Schuiven met de kaart geeft vaak schade. Hier dus ook. Het lijkt allemaal zo simpel, maar dat is het dus niet. Check steeds wat je hebt gedaan.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146778661
eggie (2024-01-28 14:11:29+00:00): De Breukelsestraat ligt nu verkeerd.
Dat komt omdat je iets selecteer. Een node van de straat aansluiting en dan gaat schuiven.. Dan schuift je node mee met alles dat er aan vast zit.
eggie (2024-01-28 15:11:22+00:00): warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway
  	1

Schade hersteld Breukelsestraat.

MVG
eggie
maasa123 (2024-05-09 20:25:10+00:00): Hej! 

Sätt inte access=permissive på bommar/grindar om du inte verifierat på plats. Det överensstämmer inte med allemansrätten och orsakar fel i ruttverktyg för vandring och cykling.
Richard L (2024-05-10 05:35:25+00:00): Du har säkert en poäng. Jag försöker ta bort grindarna som jag lade till igen.
Shepard Vkn (2024-01-28 13:36:29+00:00): 1st bench location created is wrong. I misplaced the pin. Could you please cancelled the 1st bench pinned? 
The second is correct. ;-)
Thanks!
gscholz (2024-02-28 08:04:41+00:00): Hi jappache,
your recent edits have created several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=1.03567&lat=43.79129&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146779206

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the map. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Britzz (2024-03-24 18:08:42+00:00): comme sur le tronçon Sud, j'ai supprimé la voie créée en trop et donné le nom à la route pré-existante
mavl (2024-02-23 18:52:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147818131, 147828921 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
Mannivu (2024-01-29 09:38:53+00:00): Ciao, cosa si intende per "Lapide commemorativa 43-45"? In OSM in "name" dovrebbe esserci il nome con cui è conosciuta una cosa, ma questo nome mi sembra un po' strano, quasi descrittivo (e generalmente i monumenti nomi non ne hanno, salvo casi particolari).
Una tantum (2024-01-29 10:06:21+00:00): Se non va bene toglilo pure, sono ancora alle prime armi e posso aver fatto un errore. Il mio obiettivo era far comparire il monumento sulla carta. Ho aggiunto la foto se puo' essere utile https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lapide_ai_caduti_-_via_Piana_-_Bologna.jpg
Mannivu (2024-01-29 15:50:39+00:00): No, no, voglio giustamente capire. Se il monumento è conosciuto con quel nome va benissimo metterlo; se, invece, è una specie di codice locale, tipo un codice identificativo, si potrebbe usare il campo loc:ref. Le foto sono sempre utili :D
Una tantum (2024-01-29 16:40:32+00:00): Non credo sia il nome ufficiale né credo ne abbia uno, è una descrizione del tipo di lapide. Quello che ho trovato on line al proposito se puo' servirti: https://www.storiaememoriadibologna.it/caduti-per-la-liberta-via-piana-55-1781-opera https://www.cittadegliarchivi.it/pages/getDetail/sysCodeId:IT-CPA-FT0032-0000538 https://www.bibliotecasalaborsa.it/bolognaonline/cronologia-di-bologna/1944/torture_e_esecuzioni_sommarie_di_partigiani
Britzz (2024-03-24 18:03:12+00:00): Attention, plutôt que juste changer le nom vous avez tracé une nouvelle route en plus de l'ancienne, je me suis permis d'effacer en reportant le nom sur la voie antérieure
Константин Гам (2024-03-19 09:32:30+00:00): Вы добавили свойство "движение на автомобиле разрешено" на тротуар, не надо так, пожалуйста.
RAK777 (2024-03-19 10:31:42+00:00): Не могу понять, где я это сделал. Там же просто лесенка к воде...
Strubbl (2024-01-29 20:38:32+00:00): Hi Skinva, you are referring to mapillary pictures dating back to 2021 and older, where the objects have been edited already after the mapillary date. Are you sure your updates are always up to date?
Strubbl (2024-01-29 20:40:40+00:00): E.g. way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372735871

You change this from shelter to platform. This is not true. In the aerial imagery one can see, that this object is the shelter and not the whole platform.