piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jrachi (2024-11-26 08:00:46+00:00): Ciao.
Se aggiungi un guidepost ad una relazione, devi assegnargli il ruolo guidepost
Ivo
Jacopo (2024-11-26 08:25:26+00:00): Ciao Ivo
grazie per la segnalazione, non ho aggiunto un guidepost alla relazione, ho solo toccato una way mentre sistemavo il cimitero. 
Come avrei dovuto fare per evitare questo inconveniente? Grazie ciao
Jacopo
Jrachi (2024-11-26 08:49:35+00:00): Ciao.
Ho guardato velocemente e mi sembrava fosse una tua modifica.
Se capita ancora che ti trovi un guidepost che è inserito in una relazione, basta che metti il ruolo "guidepost" all'elemento.
Ivo
Jacopo (2024-11-26 08:51:51+00:00): Probabilmente sono stato l'ultimo a modificare la way interessata.
Grazie, tengo presente.
Ciao!
Jacopo
pavvv (2024-11-25 11:30:32+00:00): Dzięki za poprawę, ale przy zmianie na motorway usuwaj zbędny tag motorroad.
eggie (2024-11-26 08:12:04+00:00): Hi  vladislav

Please be careful with removing ways.
Better use PDOK lastest in the Nethelands. 
This was a temp road for constructionworks.

Greetz,
eggie
vladislav471yakovlev (2024-11-26 15:51:04+00:00): Hi, eggie. Thanks for the advice! Best regards, Vladislav.
Pink Duck (2024-11-25 16:21:51+00:00): This is still a legal, council prioritised tertiary grade road - even if the maintenance of it is poor. Please consider reverting to tertiary.
HolaAmigos (2024-11-25 16:32:59+00:00): @Pink Duck, thanks for taking a look. I imagine you have a lot more experience than me but I made this decision looking at the wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtertiary
"...For the purposes of mapping, it's normally best to tag distributor roads according to their relative importance in the road hierarchy, as described above.

One rule of thumb for UK roads is that highway=tertiary works well for roads wider than 4 metres (13') in width, and for faster or wider minor roads that aren't 'A' or 'B' roads. In the UK, they tend to have dashed lines down the middle, whereas unclassified roads don't."

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roads_in_the_United_Kingdom
"Generally used only on roads wide enough to allow two cars to pass safely where adequate road markings are in place"

"There are exceptions to the table above where some roads are not mapped by their legal classification because the actual usage of the road is not in keeping with the legal classification."

Is it not correct to therefore tag this as unclassified despite the official C classification, as there are no middle road markings and there is not enough space for cars to pass side by side? I note the above link also states "Country lanes" should be classed as unclassified.
Pink Duck (2024-11-25 16:35:21+00:00): This is one of those exception cases I think as it is the main route from A47 to the village of North Pickenham itself - despite being narrow as is rather typical of most rural Norfolk roads. Many are tertiary grade, salted as priority routes, etc.
HolaAmigos (2024-11-25 16:50:04+00:00): You raise a good point, I was thinking of connectivity in terms of routes between villages, but having easy access to a major A road without having to go through another town does mean it makes sense to mark it as a higher priority route. As an aside, although I am used to driving on rural Norfolk roads, this particular one is really bad in terms of potholes and maintenance. Perhaps navigation apps will take into account the smoothness tag when calculating longer routes.

I'll change it back to a tertiary now. Thanks for your help!
eggie (2024-11-25 11:07:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-30 01:56:46+00:00): reverted for vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159761284
Taksine (2024-11-26 11:22:53+00:00): Thanks for fixing this.
Nakaner-repair (2024-11-25 10:35:48+00:00): This changeset reverts changesets 157914501,157915445,157915948,157946746,157946837,157947292,157953173,157954037,157954443,157994600,157995243,158003220,158003756,158038895,158295351,158347204,158347304,158362056,158362405,158400852,158412642,158414952,158451333,158525749,158538619,158571286,158647930,159461775
rempshaener (2025-10-22 18:57:28+00:00): Hallo,

das wäre

emergency=fire_hydrant
fire_hydrant:type=pipe
fire_hydrant:pressure=suction 
water_source=water_tank
water_tank:volume=218m³
couplings=1 
couplings:diameters=A

Viele Grüße
eggie (2024-11-25 11:13:40+00:00): Dag Stegink,

Wij zijn er als OSM community nog niet achter of op een paaltje en fietspad  ook emergency=yes nodig is in LiveNav. 
Ook is het van belang om de eigenschappen van het paaltje toe te voegen.
bollard=fixed   foldable? flexible?
maxspeed 30 heb ik verwijderd.
Mag dit nu wel of niet routeren voor de hulpdiensten? 

MVG
eggie
Stegink08 (2024-11-25 11:22:10+00:00): Goedemiddag Eggie,

Ik heb bollard op fixed gezet.
Hulpdiensten hebben hier ook geen doorgang.
eggie (2024-11-25 11:28:32+00:00): Ahh duidelijk.
literan (2024-11-25 17:25:14+00:00): по пропуску это access=private. Исправлю
AndyB_66 (2024-11-26 10:29:37+00:00): nie twórz fikcji

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159609042
eggie (2024-11-25 11:16:19+00:00): Dag Matvey.. Waarom heb je de adresnode verwijderd? 
Bestaat dit adres niet meer?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=159567991

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-11-25 11:20:31+00:00): Adresnode hersteld
mcliquid (2024-11-25 11:28:45+00:00): Minor edit with a massive bbox.

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Andrea Musuruane (2024-12-24 09:45:41+00:00): Ciao. Non mi risulta che il museo occupi tutto l'edificio. Puoi indicarlo con un nodo nella parte dove è presente il museo? Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159568249
ticki_52 (2024-12-29 13:53:08+00:00): Hallo MattGPS, bin mal im Schlosspark Oppenweiler vorbei "gesurft" und habe mir die gemappten Elements mal angeschaut. Mir fiel auf, dass die MP-Relationen für den See und den "Wald" lt. OSM-Wiki nicht gemappt werden sollen. Zitat aus dem OSM-Wiki: "Seen und Wälder in einem Park gehören zum Park dazu, also bitte keine Multipolygon-Elemente verwenden, um sie auszuschließen!" Wie siehst Du das? Grüße ticki_52
MattGPS (2025-01-03 13:38:59+00:00): Leider ist OSm an vielen Stellen furchtbar kompliziert gemacht worden, Relationen, inner-outer-Verschachtelungen, und mehrere Merkmale verknüpft. Da muss eine Mauer gleichzeitig den Stadtpark begrenzen, den "Wald" darin, und das Wohngebiet außerhalb. Für mich ist es nur eine Mauer. Das Wohngebiet endet woanders, und der Wald auch. Ein Kuddelmuddel an manchen Stellen.
ticki_52 (2025-01-04 22:02:53+00:00): Die ganze Welt ist ein Kuddelmuddel. arum sollte OSM etwas anderes sein? Nun ja, manchmal ist es schon etwas anstrengend mit dem Mappen, denn man will ja alles korrekt hinrichten, damit die Renderer unsere Rohdaten optisch ansprechend darstellen können. Also schneiden wir mit einem Multipolygon ein Loch in eine Fläche, um in das Loch gemäß Vorgabe einen See zu platzieren. Wenn die Fläche aber ein Park ist, dann darf der See auch ohne Loch dort sein, weil ein See ja zu einem Park gehört. OSM hat halt seine eigene Logik.... Also mappen wir eben weiter....
flo2154 (2024-11-25 15:22:32+00:00): Hallo bingo,

danke für die Ergänzungen von "addr:city" und "addr:suburb". Auch die Zusammenlegung von Papeterie Löntz bzw. Textil-Reinigung und der jeweiligen Hermes-Filiale sind sinnvoll, da der Paketshop eine Zusatzleistung des jeweiligen Ladens ist, er aber nicht eigenständig betrieben wird. (Ich hätte das allerdings eher in zwei Änderungssätzen gemacht, da es doch recht unterschiedliche Änderungen sind, die sich leicht trennen lassen.)

Bei der Postfiliale im REWE sieht das aber anders aus: Die Postfiliale ist mit eigenen Mitarbeiter:innen betrieben und liegt sozusagen nur zufällig innerhalb des Verkaufsraums des Rewe-Markts. Das kann man auch daran sehen, dass die Öffnungszeiten der Postfiliale kürzer sind als die vom Rewe. Diese Informationen sind durch die Zusammenlegung verloren gegangen; insbesondere die Öffnungszeiten der Postfiliale fände ich wichtig zu taggen.

Kannst du diese eine Änderung bitte rückgängig machen? Oder weißt du, wie die Öffnungszeiten der Postfiliale am Rewe-POI getagged werden können?

Viele Grüße
Flo
bingo (2024-11-26 14:11:41+00:00): Danke für den Kommentar, aktuell kümmere ich mich schwerpunktmäßig um Adressen, Postpartner und Baudenkmäler, deswegen sind es oft viele Änderungen pro Änderungssatz.

Bei der Postfiliale in der Rewe habe ich mich auf den Standortfinder der Deutschen Post und die Angaben dort suggerierten mir, dass Rewe der Postpartner ist. Unterschiedliche Öffnungszeiten könnte ich mit dem tag post_office:opening_hours ergänzen, wenn du damit einverstanden bist.
aTarom (2024-11-26 08:13:47+00:00): Hola gracias por editar, una duda, la etiqueta
"ref:cajarural"
se podría simplificar por "ref"?
Saludos
garaolaza (2024-11-26 08:37:06+00:00): Hola!

No, porque ese código es específico de la red de Caja Rural. Incluso, no estoy seguro pero diría que es específico de Caja Rural de Navarra.

Lo he añadido para poder referenciarlo en el futuro y poder actualizar por ejemplo números de teléfono, ya que la Caja Rural publica sus datos en un formato JSON muy procesable.

Gracias a tí!
aTarom (2024-11-26 08:53:23+00:00): Ok, gracias por responder tan rápido, un placer así :)
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:09:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
MarkoŠatrak (2024-11-27 07:02:43+00:00): Reverted because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159645265
Robert Whittaker (2026-05-27 13:19:09+00:00): Hi astradotblue. In this changeset you added the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12373492646 , which you tagged as an outdoor shop called "Mountain Hardware".

I'm wondering if this was a typo, and it's actually a branch of the "Maintain Warehouse" chain. I don't suppose you recall or know the area do you?
astradotblue (2026-05-27 13:25:12+00:00): I have updated the name, it is Mountain Warehouse and I'm actually unsure how I managed to type hardware, thanks for noticing :)
Mir76 (2024-12-03 20:01:39+00:00): Вы опять стираете существующие на местности дороги?
archie (2025-01-12 06:50:22+00:00): Hej, varför har du raderat korsnings-noden mellan gc-vägen och järnvägen här (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4400955788)? De två andra liknande korsningar norr om denna är kvar (rätteligen). Men varför har du just raderat denna korsning?
aceman444 (2025-03-15 22:53:57+00:00): Zdravim, preco tato zmena? Aky je zdroj?
Taya_S (2024-11-25 17:33:31+00:00): Again, these building outlines do not match the aerials at all. They're just rectangles. Please do not add low quality incorrect data.
nevw (2024-11-26 01:39:22+00:00): I don’t see any value in these edits. It gives a false impression that the building footprints have been mapped. In fact it would be easier to delete them than adjust each to correct shape. Expect all these just need to be reverted.
Taya_S (2025-01-15 18:40:31+00:00): Reverted low quality building edits.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161391757
wombatmaper (2025-04-22 20:32:11+00:00): hi, you seem to have incorreclty tagged this road member as diet:vegetarian=b. I have fixed it
felipeeugenio (2025-04-22 20:46:10+00:00): same issue. thank you very much.
wombatmaper (2025-04-22 20:52:37+00:00): no worries, thanks for your work!
archie (2025-01-12 06:44:41+00:00): Hej, varför har du lagt till layertaggen (layer=-1) på detta järnvägsspår (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/562455606) samt de 12 dito i närheten? De syns på satellitfotot. Så varför har du placerat dem under jorden?
mavl (2025-05-13 15:08:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
:-} (2024-11-28 14:56:35+00:00): Raczej nie jako krajowa. Wycofane
mavl (2024-11-26 15:01:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159620751 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16917].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2024-11-26 15:01:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159620751 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16917].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Zekovski (2025-01-22 14:10:53+00:00): Hello.
Je me suis permis de rajouter old_name=Carta'Jeu
Ça peut être pratique de le mettre quand on ferme une boutique pour voir à quoi elle correspondait avant.

Bonne journée ! 👋
Turb (2025-01-22 14:13:10+00:00): Ah merci, je ne connaissais pas cette propriété !
literan (2024-11-25 17:30:54+00:00): неверный тег. 

no означает что вообще никому нельзя. Сюда же явно заезжает транспорт этой промзоны
mavl (2024-11-26 15:01:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159620751 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16917].
pavvv (2024-11-25 13:29:12+00:00): Dzięki za poprawki, ale pamiętaj proszę o tagu motorroad=yes, szczególnie na drogach trunk i trunk_link.
AndyB_66 (2024-11-26 10:29:38+00:00): nie twórz fikcji

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159609042
ryztrk (2024-11-26 20:55:05+00:00): please change tag landuse=grass
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159571336
User5848 (2025-06-19 08:49:35+00:00): Landuse=grass olarak düzeltilmiştir: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1337702099
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Filip009 (2024-11-25 19:07:35+00:00): Zdravím, nejaké zvyšky koľají je stále vidieť z Ortofotomozaiky. Všetky zrovnali so zemou?
masnak (2024-11-25 19:16:19+00:00): Niekedy v roku 2017 boli koľaje vytrhané a predané do šrotu. Ak niečo vidieť, je možné, že zostali nejaké podvaly a násyp.
Možno zostala vyhýba v stanici Bystričany, ostatné koľaje sú bezpečne preč. Som v tom objekte v podstate denne.
Filip009 (2024-11-25 19:22:30+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:railway
Okej, tak potom by to bolo treba len zmeniť na abandoned :)
masnak (2024-11-25 19:26:35+00:00): Objekt nie je opustený ani náhodou. Sídli tam kopec firiem. Len koľaje sú fuč.
Filip009 (2024-11-25 19:44:17+00:00): Ale to som myslel pre koľaje smerujúce do objektu. Otvorte ten link, čo som poslal a tam sú vysvetlené jednotlivé štádiá railway.
masnak (2024-11-26 07:24:24+00:00): Nuž štádiá railway nejdem študovať. Občas sa snažím pomôcť v mojej lokalite dávať dokopy openstreet, keďže túto lokalitu relatívne dobre poznám. Z času na čas sa sem (openstreetmap) mrknem, opravím, vylepším, spresním. Ak máte tú možnosť, pokojne to opravte do stavu, ktorý navrhujete, mne to určite prekážať nebude. Násyp tej trate je viditeľný už len v málo miestach a onedlho už nebude patrný nikde.
Filip009 (2024-11-26 07:34:32+00:00): disused - nepoužívaná trať
abandoned - zničená, ale stále sú viditeľné zvyšky násypov...
razed - už nie je viditeľné nič
masnak (2024-11-26 07:40:48+00:00): OK. Ďakujem za vysvetlenie
NeisBot (2024-11-25 12:58:48+00:00): Hello makhuyi, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/12373620973

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=159572298
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-29 07:06:07+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159686447
eggie (2024-11-25 13:31:56+00:00): Dag Jordi.

Je vraagt feedback ... Wanneer er geen fysieke scheiding is tussen de busbaan en de hoofdrijbaan wordt er niet een aparte busbaan ingetekend. 
Dus volgens de 'regels' van OSM was het juist goed gemapt hier. 
Ook kun je beter geen busroutes bewerken met editor iD 
Meestal zijn daarna de OV routes stuk. 
Het kan wel met josm. 
De busroutes zijn overigens nog intact. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-11-25 13:34:43+00:00): reverted by changeset #159573880

Jordi,

Zou me voorlopig niet wagen aan die busroutes en zeker niet met editor iD.
Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-11-25 13:39:52+00:00): Mocht je het anders willen neem dan contact op met de voorgaande mapper Jeroen Hoek,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98419179
iamJordi (2024-11-25 13:48:12+00:00): Goedemiddag Eggie,

Excuses voor de foute interpretatie van de buslijn. Ik zag dat de lijn was gemaakt met het doel dat de bus aan het einde van de lijn weer terug op de conventionele weg ging, wat niet zo bleek te zijn. Erg bedankt voor uw tijd om de buslijn weer terug in de juiste staat te zetten.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Jordi
eggie (2024-11-25 14:05:55+00:00): Zo zit osm vol met dit soort addertjes.
Mapse
citrula (2024-11-26 09:16:53+00:00): You added a surface tag to a bus route in this edit. I removed it for you.
citrula (2024-11-26 09:17:15+00:00): You added a surface tag to a bus route in this edit. I removed it for you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159573283
citrula (2024-11-26 09:17:16+00:00): You added a surface tag to a bus route in this edit. I removed it for you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159573283
citrula (2024-11-26 09:17:19+00:00): You added a surface tag to a bus route in this edit. I removed it for you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159573283
eggie (2024-11-25 13:42:20+00:00): Dag Mbnkrt  Je vraagt feedback.

Lijkt me oke.. 
Je zou de Nederlandse naam ook kunnen toevoegen als species:nl=..

MVG
eggie
silversurfer83 (2024-11-25 16:23:27+00:00): Hallo Jessica,

schön, dass du zu OSM gefunden hast. Wir freuen uns über jede helfende Hand.

Diese Änderung hier habe ich erstmal wieder rückgängig gemacht, da das Haus schon sauber als Haus erfasst war.

Falls du Fragen hast, kannst du dich jederzeit unter c.osm.org an die Gemeinschaft der Beitrangenden wenden oder guck mal unter https://learnosm.org/de/beginner/

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159573722
Nielkrokodil (2025-05-12 05:49:27+00:00): Ist die Lowegasse in diesem Abschnitt eine Schulstraße? Laut https://www.graz.at/cms/beitrag/10413346/7759964/Schulstrassen.html dürfte sie eine sein.
eriosw (2025-05-12 17:20:07+00:00): Eine Tafel ist mir nicht aufgefallen, aber ich war schon lange nicht mehr dort. Werde beim nächsten Mal nachsehen.
rhhs (2024-11-26 09:13:52+00:00): Hi, I think you made a mistake here. I think there are a OBB and a Postbank next to each other, and you changed the OBB to a Postbank that is already mapped?
venelin98 (2024-11-26 10:44:33+00:00): Hi, it seems you are right. Thank you for noticing!
RedAuburn (2024-12-08 16:24:15+00:00): Hi, thanks for contributing, but this cycleway is already mapped on the road (https://www.osm.org/relation/22602)

a separate cycleway line should only be used when there is physical separation from the road, or through parks etc. additionally, please don't ignore the warnings in the editor - ways should be properly connected to other ways so a routing graph can be properly built.
Steffi Munique Damasceno dos Reis Vieira (2024-11-28 12:35:40+00:00): #mapeadoresIVIDES #YouthMappersUFRJ #oficinaJGEOTEC2024
inclusão de árvore, caminho e construção.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-02-16 23:43:53+00:00): DWG revert of international border change

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162591054
onovy (2024-12-27 19:35:30+00:00): Ahoj,

transformator na sloupu el. vedeni se znaci jako
power=pole
transformer=distribution

viz. dokumentace:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Elektrick%C3%A1_veden%C3%AD

Opravil jsem.

Dekuji.
ToniE (2024-11-25 21:05:43+00:00): Servus,

für die restlichen Segmente des Kreisels gilt noch "junction=roundabout", was u.U. einem "oneway=yes" entspricht?

Wenn dem so ist, können Navis von Hofolding nach Sauerlach hier nicht lang routen?

Gruß
Toni
landini (2024-11-26 07:08:11+00:00): Die "restlichen Segmente" wechseln, fallsweise auch kurzfristig. Es ist aber immer eine 1-spurige Durchfahrt in beide Richtungen möglich.
Filip009 (2024-11-25 19:14:46+00:00): Zdravím, prosím nepridávajte názov jednotlivým cestám. Radšej pomenujte parkovisko. Pokiaľ sa ale jedná o oficiálny názov.
Leo Slager (2024-12-06 00:56:12+00:00): oneway over de hele lengte van de Lutgerstraat ?

ik pas het even aan.
Dijkstraat_nl (2024-12-06 07:24:35+00:00): Inderdaad een foutje van mijn kant. Moest alleen het stukje bij de kruising zijn.
eggie (2024-11-25 16:07:42+00:00): Dag Noud de dubbeltagging theater en bieb heb ik verwijderd.
Die staan al op de adresnodes.

MVG
eggie