piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
wireguy (2024-02-02 02:36:44+00:00): Nathan, welcome to OSM.  Thanks for adding houses to Scotch Plains Ave. A better comment would be helpful.  Pressing the 'Q' key when you have a building selected will square the corners.   Keep mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146966174
gosgtan (2024-02-03 22:19:11+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez supprimé les trains entre Douai et Cambrai?? Il faudra penser à les remettre en 2025 à la fin des travaux alors...
Zh9567 (2024-02-04 05:35:48+00:00): Hi mataharimau, some section boundaries seems to have their admin_level=* incorrectly tagged. Can you please fix it? Thanks.
Patrick Lehner (2024-02-24 02:55:56+00:00): こんにちは@dn1013さん、
この変更セットに、amenity=universityの広いエリアをbuilding=yesに変更しましたのに、そのエリアの中にはまだ他の建物はあり、空中画像やMapillary画像によると何かあってないかなと思います。
失礼しますがとりあえずこの変更を戻しておきます。
andi9876 (2024-02-02 06:13:56+00:00): Hi.
Please stop add viewpoints. remember, its visible for everybody. You can use an app for private favorites.
Zainab Ramadhanis (2024-02-20 07:56:53+00:00): Hello, I hope you are doing well. 

I noticed you added some buildings with highway=unclassified tags. Please be more careful before you are uploading your edits. Happy mapping!
Ewen Hill (2024-02-08 06:46:34+00:00): Hi Koof, I have also reverted this changeset as well due to the mass deletion and lack of clarity surrounding the changeset description.  Please consider before deleting natural features others have mapped.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146967914
opendcc (2024-02-02 08:10:00+00:00): reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146974493
andi9876 (2024-02-02 06:14:14+00:00): Hi.
Please stop add viewpoints. remember, its visible for everybody. You can use an app for private favorites.
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-06 23:14:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 147155096 where the changeset comment is: remove bogus mapswithme 'viewpoints'
Nick The King (2024-02-02 08:05:38+00:00): Could you please help me clean up golf edits for Wai’alae Country Club golf course on the island of Oahu, Hawaii?
CurlingMan13 (2024-02-07 23:11:11+00:00): I'm trying to as I have time.  Anything in particular?
emersonveenstra (2024-02-02 11:25:28+00:00): Hi there,

Thanks for the edits! One thing to note is that crossings like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/951256225
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/951256313
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1245426679

still need to have the "highway=footway" tag so routers understand what it is (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:footway?uselang=en). Would you mind adding that tag back? Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2024-02-02 11:34:07+00:00): Also, for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11577999634, you shouldn't combine the stop sign with the crossing tag. The correct way to do it is by creating a Stop Sign node where cars stop, and then a crossing node where pedestrians cross.
emersonveenstra (2024-02-09 14:02:34+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147258432
citrula (2024-02-02 03:21:31+00:00): You deleted a lot of objects in this changeset. Was that intentional?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146968116
nick10101 (2024-02-02 03:43:30+00:00): yes
citrula (2024-02-02 03:57:43+00:00): Some of these (for example, the football pitch at the high school) seem to still exist. Can you explain why?
Ewen Hill (2024-03-01 09:38:29+00:00): Hi , there appears to be no building where you have placed the building - can you provide anything further
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146968127
jleedev (2026-04-12 14:12:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4828018 is asking about this
andi9876 (2024-02-02 06:14:44+00:00): Hi.
Please stop add viewpoints. remember, its visible for everybody. You can use an app for private favorites.
opendcc (2024-02-02 10:26:10+00:00): Gebäudenutzung ist nicht der Eigenname. Bitte dieses falsche Tagging unterlassen.
opendcc (2024-02-02 17:51:47+00:00): https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1GOY
Eino81 (2024-03-16 15:08:41+00:00): Hi r00tcz, well, that path next to the Cakovicka, that does not exist anymore... Why do you add something there, based on ortophoto, which is not valid anymore? I remove it, just telling you, ortopphoto is not always good. Go there and check y yourself, before you add something to the map...
r00tcz (2024-03-16 15:49:30+00:00): This was TRACK not PATH, it's a track used by construction machinery. Yes, old path is gone, but this is completely different way. And it still exists, here is 2 days old photo of the situation on the ground: https://www.r00t.cz/i/k05snkkr.jpg
It's perfectly normal to map tracks that go trough construction area and I will be adding it back, it goes all the way to Letnanska, just before recycling center. 
And yes, I actually live here and map by surveying what's on the ground, not by ortophoto alone.
Eino81 (2024-03-16 16:23:08+00:00): Track or path, doesn't matter, in case, when it is forbidden to go on it. At least add there a NO for all the access... Zakaz vystup. No-one can get in there, only the builders...
Eino81 (2024-03-16 16:25:26+00:00): You know, these maps are used in Wandrer Earth cycling challenge, and when we can't enter to a path or track, that gives us bad statistics...
r00tcz (2024-03-16 16:56:54+00:00): Access is not forbidden, at least not for walking, until there is construction area fence down the track. After I took this photo I walked there in the direction of Shell gas station, just after that truck passed. But yes, there is sign to keep traffic out, so will be adding that on the track.
But please next time solve this by adding track restriction. Not by deleting it from the map, because it still obviously exists in the real world.
Eino81 (2024-03-16 17:04:32+00:00): I added the track back there, where it was. With the access level as NO. It is not normal to walk in to such areas, if you are not a builder...
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 07:09:49+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146968493
opendcc (2024-02-02 13:22:49+00:00): Hallo,

letzte Bitte: unterlassen Sie das falsche Nametagging. Bisher habe ich mich bemüht, die Sachen zu fixen, dazu fehlt irgendwann Zeit und Lust.
Kovoschiz (2024-02-02 10:22:16+00:00): Please don't add the whole title. `name=` is for common and proper names only.
MxxCon (2024-02-16 04:22:31+00:00): Since in US there’s no official regulatory body managing hotel star ratings and each hotel can rate themselves however many stars they want, it serves no purpose other than promotional/advertisement for the hotels.

As such, the use of stars=* tag for hotels should be deprecated.
arjunaraoc (2024-02-02 10:15:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
Reverted vide https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146978527 as your edits seem to be experimental.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146971856
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-06-03 06:27:15+00:00): Hallo,

Quellenangaben zu einer Änderungen werden nicht als source-Tag an die Objekte selber getaggt, sondern im Änderungssatz angeben, also beim Hochladen gibt man Kommentar und Quelle an.

Zu der Quelle selber: Laut dem Impressum von https://kirchengemeindelexikon.de/ dürfen die Daten nur nach schriftlicher Genehmigung verwendet werden. Gibt es dies Genehmigung? Gibt es Einschränkungen/Voraussetzungen für die Nutzung?

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-12-31 09:07:34+00:00): Tại sao có GPS car vào được 200537620 mà em để motorcar=destination vậy em?
Minh Nguyen (2024-03-29 05:48:33+00:00): Hi, was the change from network=IN:NH to IN:NE intentional? The ways all have ref tags that are still prefixed with NH, and I wasn’t aware that a National Expressway could have such a large number. Would this route number be signposted in Roman numerals like the other NEs?
Heinz_V (2024-03-29 07:11:42+00:00): Yes, the government declares the Dwarka Highway as an Expressway (finished March 2024). The ref has not changed as far as I know.
Minh Nguyen (2024-03-29 15:32:32+00:00): Ah, thank you for the clarification. Are mappers in India distinguishing between expressway (motorway) as a highway classification and the National Expressway system? As far as I know, the National Highway system also includes some expressways, but there would be no way to know this from how a route like this is tagged, other than to guess that “NH” on the way ref refers to a National Highway.
Jordi MF (2024-02-02 18:36:13+00:00): Hola Baxe Nafarroa,

Gracias por mejorar los datos de OSM, pero la Casa del Marxucal no es un monumento de OpenStreetmap (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic=monument) porque no está dedicado a sucesos o personas y recordarlos. Por ese motivo, no puedes ser historic=monument. Como mucho, si tiene interés como edificio, puede etiquetarse como historic=building, lo que me parece más correcto.
Saludos,
Jordi
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-02 07:50:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11578299694

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
piotrekc64 (2024-02-02 07:56:04+00:00): Adres jest ten sam co budynku obok. Kwiaciarnia jest oficjalnie zarejestrowana pod podanym adresem we wskazanym miejscu i znajduje się właśnie przy ulicy Przechodniej, która jest obok.
NorthCrab (2024-02-02 20:48:45+00:00): Hej! Wszystko przez to że nazwa ulicy była podana jako "ul. Przechodnia" z niepotrzebnym przedrostkiem ul. :-) Przywróciłem adres i usunąłem przedrostek, bo tym więcej informacji tym lepiej! Potwierdzam, że kwiaciarnia wyświetla się już na mapie ale może być wymagane opróżnienie cache w przeglądarce (CTRL+F5). Pozdrawiam i dzięki za kontrybucję!
Pt873 (2024-02-02 16:30:29+00:00): Está incorreto. A região está passando por obras e o traçado foi modificado.
KuskokwimRiver (2024-02-05 16:35:09+00:00): Hello, Pt873, thank you for contacting me. From what I can see with publicly available resources (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-2.5010678768158&lng=-44.289009094238&z=17&pKey=227686202153064) is that the link road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1245603796#map=17/-2.50085/-44.28828) is an exit from Avenida Coronel Colares Moreira (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/765852489). Are the construction updates to this link road permanent? If you have more up to date resources or local knowledge of the area I will defer to your modifications. Have a nice day.  

Translated response:

Olá, Pt873, obrigado por entrar em contato comigo. Pelo que posso ver com recursos disponíveis publicamente (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-2.5010678768158&lng=-44.289009094238&z=17&pKey=227686202153064) é que a via de ligação (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1245603796#map=17/-2.50085/-44.28828) é uma saída da Avenida Coronel Colares Moreira (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/765852489). As atualizações de construção desta estrada de ligação são permanentes? Se você tiver recursos mais atualizados ou conhecimento local da área eu vou deferir suas modificações.Tenha um bom dia.
Pt873 (2024-02-05 18:54:44+00:00): Sim, são permanentes. Há varias obras no momento na cidade (moro aqui) e esta é uma das mudanças que já está valendo (via de ligação para a Avenida Coronel Colares Moreira a partir da Rua dos Azulões).
KuskokwimRiver (2024-02-09 21:55:14+00:00): Hello Pt873 thank you for your response.  You have local knowledge of the area so I will defer to your updates.  Have a nice day. 

Translated message:

Olá Pt873, obrigado pela sua resposta. Você tem conhecimento local da área que vou deferir às suas atualizações. Tenha um bom dia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-02-02 11:35:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146981441 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some crayon-in grassland.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15649 etc.
aq123 (2024-02-09 08:46:31+00:00): Hi! 
At least some of your changes do not correspond to reality or contain tagging mistakes: 
- Way 1186083208 is definitely passable by car as I've seen it, so I think it should stay highway=service
- Way 1212015490 is not steps but just a link for pedestrian routing
- If with way 1245458033 you meant to tag hotel territory, it shouldn't have building=yes and layer=-1.
And name and tourism=hotel probably should be removed from buildings in this case.
- Names shouldn't contain the feature type (hotel)

P.S. Можем обсудить на русском, если так будет удобнее.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146974063
Hayk Petrosyan (2024-02-10 08:57:31+00:00): Hi!
The Way 1186083208 has been marked as a pedestrian lane as it doesn’t have an exit for cars. Now it is fixed.

Regarding the rest, all the mistakes are corrected. Thank you for your attention to detail.
aq123 (2024-02-20 18:47:50+00:00): Hi!
Sorry for late reply. 
Here, I've taken a photo of this place:
https://imgur.com/9rm5qZ7
For me it looks like a service way with quite a good surface.
Hayk Petrosyan (2024-02-28 07:31:02+00:00): Hi!
Sorry for late reply.
Yes, but the part above that section is impassable for cars. 
But,If You consider that it is wrong, You can fix it.               
 Thank You for Your attention.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-02-02 11:34:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146981441 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some crayon-in grassland.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15649 etc.
divaddivag (2024-02-02 08:02:01+00:00): Pb envoi JOSM: jardinage Ver-sur-Mer depuis ortho 2023+ local knwoledge
MxxCon (2024-02-06 08:35:41+00:00): I see no traces of this railway in any of the available satellite imagery.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146974346
stephenms3 (2024-02-06 15:59:01+00:00): There is the service path and tree clearing. This is the right of way of the connection between national docks and LVRR. Why review bad before consultation…
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146974346
MxxCon (2024-02-07 19:05:41+00:00): The segment that you mapped crosses over fences and other objects making it extremely unlikely that there's anything left of that railroad.
You are welcome to map that service road or driveway or access path. But it is not railroad.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146974346
CurlingMan13 (2024-02-07 23:03:17+00:00): Historic/once-existing railways can be mapped on OHM.  But they do not belong on OSM if they don't currently exist.
stephenms3 (2024-02-08 01:00:12+00:00): Thank you CurlingMan13 I agree. MxxCon, why not just change it to service path? What is the "likelihood of rails"? Fences are sometimes put over out-of-use railways. Regardless, the right-of-way still exists. No reason to delete.
MxxCon (2024-02-08 01:14:55+00:00): I see nothing on any available satellite imagery to indicate that there's anything left of those rails to match what you mapped.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-07-01 05:54:47+00:00): @stephenms3 what kind of sources you used to map that there are CURRENTLY a traces of rail there?
stephenms3 (2024-07-08 03:24:05+00:00): 1.) USGS survey data confirms that at one point the Pennsylvania Railroad extension to their Exchange Place terminal along the harbor had a connection on the lower level to what is still called today, the "National Docks Branch". The history and deals made between the railroads in the early 20th century required a plethora of switches and connections to the freight docks mostly controlled by the Lehigh valley RR. Just south of the Communipaw Terminal. In fact, this at one point was just a branch, the tunnel portion going south in this direction was added later. Link to the USGS maps website. https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/viewer/#15/40.7255/-74.0614 

2.) I have been to the site while railfanning in the area. The ROW is still intact. Fences are there to keep pedestrians away from the in-use lines. Typically, on mothballed or disused ROWs.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-07-10 14:58:36+00:00): Note that question was not about ownership and right of way but about railway tracks. 

Are there any remains of railway tracks? Do you have photos from your trip?
eggie (2024-02-02 09:05:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Alle gebouwen zijn afkomstig van directe import vanuit de BAG (Kadaster)  Beter niets aan veranderen.
Ik zal de gebouwen herstellen. 
Bij herimport worden je eigen mutaties weer overschreven. 
Mocht iets niet kloppen dan kun je een terugmelding doen naar het Kadaster. 
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=tempeliersstraat+71&objectId=0392100000018763&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=103437.018&geometry.y=487786.201&zoomlevel=15&bijbehorendeAdressen=Pand

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146974447

Alle begin is moeilijk. Adresnodes zijn al aanwezig . Je kunt daar op bijtaggen. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-02-02 09:12:02+00:00): Gebouw hersteld naar kadasterdata.. shop tag aangepast zodat je straks een symbool op de kaart ziet.
Bedrijf samengevoegd met BAG adresnode. 
Even ctrl-f5 voor het effect als je niets ziet. 

MVG
eggie
Christouf0676 (2024-02-17 16:52:20+00:00): Salut Arthur, 
Si j'en crois le Wiki, ""watering_place" indique les endroits où les animaux peuvent boire de l'eau, à l'instar de amenity=drinking_water qui permet de signaler un lieu pour les humains."

Du coup ça n'apparaît ni sur Strava ni sur Géovélo, ce qui est dommage. 

Peux-tu faire la modif sur les autres point de ce groupe ?

Christophe
arthurd_geovelo (2024-02-19 08:11:06+00:00): Bonjour Christophe, 
ce serait en effet trés pratique pour ces deux logiciels, cependant il s'agit en effet d'abreuvoir à bétail, trés probablement issu d'un captage sans aucune indication si l'eau est potable. Dans ces régions montagneuses on a souvent des problèmes de douve donc je refuse de mettre drinking water sur ces points. Sauf s'il s'agit d'une fontaine publique (les vertes) dont l'eau est protégée et issue d'un circuit traité.
Si tu veux pouvoir rajouter ce tag je te conseille de prendre contact avec la direction des eaux locales.

Arthur
Christouf0676 (2024-02-19 18:00:11+00:00): En tous cas pour https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11578352866 il s'agit d'une fontaine d'eau potable à laquelle j'ai bu il y a 2 semaines (https://maps.app.goo.gl/bumnjCpPqVoLGcpo9)
arthurd_geovelo (2024-02-20 08:17:13+00:00): Celui là ressemble bien à un circuit protégé et traité en effet, si je ne l'ai pas marqué en drinking_water c'est probablement par précipitation. N'hésite pas à faire évoluer cette thématique dans la zone, elle a un fort attrait touristique et ils auront besoin d'eau vu le climat.
Tjuro (2025-03-08 11:31:19+00:00): Beste  NLWerner,

Ik zie dat je hier parkeren en andere elementen vast hebt geplakt aan wegen.

Zou je dit in het vervolg niet meer willen doen?

Ik heb het voor je opgelost.

Met vriedelijke groet,

Tjuro
gscholz (2024-02-11 06:54:33+00:00): Hi Kosebi,
your recent edits have left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=7.43015&lat=10.53795&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146975068

Can you please fix this?

This kind of result is very typical for JOSM users who just press "o" and do not care about the results. You can apply the internal validator to avoid uploading such errors.

Kind regards
Guido
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-02 08:40:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10754448918
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10754448917
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1245464792
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1245464793

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mazda05 (2024-02-02 15:20:06+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
Jakka (2024-02-03 08:56:48+00:00): "pavillon" est nom ou définition du building ?
enezeg (2024-02-02 09:27:16+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM,
Pour vous aider à contribuer, 
vous trouverez des informations sur la manière de renseigner la mairie et son agence postale en consultant les pages du wiki osm :

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/France/data.gouv.fr/Import_des_points_de_contact_postaux
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dpost_office
Bonnes contributions
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 07:05:52+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146976011
literan (2024-07-25 20:19:42+00:00): зачем вы создали дубли урочищ? почищу.
literan (2024-07-25 20:20:07+00:00): например, здесь https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4339742
bicyclett (2024-03-28 11:36:16+00:00): Hallo,
ich frage mich, wieso der Path "access=no" hat. Ist der ganz aktuell gesperrt, oder ist das ein Versehen?
DWentus (2024-03-28 16:10:13+00:00): Nur ein Versehen. Es ist fantastisch, dass es dir aufgefallen ist. Ich habe den Weg wieder auf access=yes gesetzt.
bicyclett (2024-03-29 09:56:25+00:00): super, danke!
enezeg (2024-02-02 09:41:08+00:00): Bonjour,

pour le salon de coiffure, vous pouvez appliquer le tag shop=hairdresser au bâtiment dans son ensemble si le salon l'occupe en entier, sinon sur un point (comme la boulangerie d'à côté). 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:shop%3Dhairdresser

les tags 
- female=yes
- male=yes
permettent de préciser que c'est mixte.
Marek-M (2024-02-02 09:41:54+00:00): Informacje o AED z UG Kuślin
JLZIMMERMANN (2024-02-16 12:54:30+00:00): Le changeset n'est pas explicite : 
un intitulé de type 

FR84,MAZAN : .... [thème des modifs]

à défaut ce pourrait être 

FR84,MAZAN : modifs ZA Piol

est bienvenu
silversurfer83 (2024-02-02 09:51:41+00:00): Nochmal moin

du hast wieder einen Hof mit Namen versehen ohne eine Quelle anzugeben. Das Thema wurde doch schon diskutiert, oder?

silversurfer83
lberges (2024-02-02 10:26:08+00:00): Das wurde im Forum ausführlich diskutiert (leider ohne Ergebnis, wie allzu häufig). Die Quelle(n) findest Du auch im Forumbeitrag.
silversurfer83 (2024-02-02 11:03:23+00:00): Ich bin mir sicher, dass das Ergebnis ziemlich Eindeutig ausfiel.
Also: Wenn du keine passende Quelle für Hofnamen hast, lass es bitte sein.

Passend wären:
- Flurnamen aus für uns erlaubten Quellen
- Schild am Eingang wo groß ein Hofname steht
- ein Webauftritt (social media, webseite,...) wo der Hof vorgestellt wird, seine Produkte angeboten werden, ähnliches
lberges (2024-02-02 11:15:49+00:00): Ich will die Diskussion nicht noch einmal führen. Die Daten sind aus dem Bundesanzeiger vom 24. August 2021.
silversurfer83 (2024-02-02 12:08:02+00:00): Fein. Auch noch 3½ (und mehr) Jahre alt.

Lass das bitte endlich.
silversurfer83 (2024-02-02 17:20:00+00:00): Im Rahmen der Transparenz die Info, dass diese Situation nun ein Ticket bei der DWG hat.