piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
joehasen87 (2024-03-28 20:56:10+00:00): @Helloimmorgan
https://twitter.com/Helloimmorgan
silversurfer83 (2024-03-28 21:39:21+00:00): Moin Gerhard :)

zwei Anmerkungen/Fragen hätte ich zu dieser Änderung bzw. allgemein:

a) der Editor Go Map erlaubt das setzen eines sprechenden Änderungssatzkommentars. Bitte mache davon gebrauch, so wie in diesem Wikiartikel beschrieben:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

b) warum trägst du die Walkemühle hier ein zweites Mal ein?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149286346
Gerhard42 (2024-04-11 14:28:41+00:00): Hi silversurfer,
Ich hatte keinen Eintrag für die Walkemühle als Restaurant gesehen. Wahrscheinlich hab ich mich "verguckt"...
Ich hatte nur einen Eintrag als "Wassermühle" gesehen.
silversurfer83 (2024-04-16 19:57:06+00:00): Alles klar :)

danke für die Rückmeldung
rainerU (2024-04-17 10:29:38+00:00): Hallo JetNo,

du hast den Radweg südlich der Kienlesbergstraße auf fertiggestellt gesetzt, d.h. von "highway=construction" auf "highway=path", obwohl dieser Weg bis jetzt noch nicht fertiggestellt ist. Bitte mache diese Änderung rückgängig.

Grüße
rainerU
gabro00 (2024-04-27 06:52:29+00:00): Szia!
A man_made=communications_tower címke olyan nagy kommunikációs tornyokra használatos, mint ami a Kékesen vagy Pécsen áll, ez nem az: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11769825892
Csak azért írok, mert elég kevés van ilyen az országban és elkezdtek szaporodni a téves címkézések.
Taktaal (2025-07-29 12:20:10+00:00): Hi. Du hast hier das Gleis 11 als separaten Bahnhof in Biel erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11769832782

War das Absicht? Ist irgendetwas speziell am Gleis 11 dass es ein separater Bahnhof sein muss?
MappSurfer (2025-10-19 07:03:11+00:00): Hallo Taktaal,

Bitte entschuldige, dass ich dir erst jetzt anworte, deine Nachricht ist bei mir irgendwie etwas untergegangen.

Nun aber zu deiner Frage: Gleis 11 ist heute das letzte meterspurige Gleis im Bahnhof Biel/Bienne. Es ist die nördliche Endstation der Biel-Täuffelen-Ins-Bahn.
Auch in der DIDOK-Liste des Bundesamtes für Verkehr (BAV) ist dieses als eigener "zugeordneter Betriebspunkt" gelistet (vgl. https://map.geo.admin.ch/?ch.bav.haltestellen-oev=8530750&lang=de&topic=ech&showTooltip=true).
Da ich diesen Bahnhofsteil damals fälschlicherweise als Bahnhof hier in OSM eingetragen hatte, wollte ich dies eigentlich bereits seit längerem korrigieren, bin aber bisher nicht dazu gekommen.
Dies habe ich nun aber hier behoben: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173476706.

Liebe Grüsse
MappSurfer
JeroenvanderGun (2024-05-31 13:01:03+00:00): Gelieve voorsorteerstroken alleen als aparte rijbanen in te tekenen als er daadwerkelijk sprake is van een fysieke scheiding. Alleen doorgetrokken strepen kunnen worden aangegeven door change:lanes=* te taggen.
silversurfer83 (2024-03-28 21:56:33+00:00): Hi.
Schon wieder ich :)

Die beiden "Silos" auf dem Birkenhof sehen aber nicht nach Silos aus.
Bist du dort vorbei gekommen oder hast du nach Luftbild gearbeitet?
Das größere von beiden sieht eher nach Güllebehälter (wäre dann sowas wie "man_made=storage_tank" + "content=slurry") aus. Das kleinere könnte auch Gülle sein, dank Haube aber unklar.
Da es sich hier um einen Milchviehbetrieb handelt, liegt der Verdacht aber nahe.
Oder haben die Betreiber mittlerweile eine Biogasanlage?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149287476
Gerhard42 (2024-04-11 14:30:45+00:00): Hi,
ich bin da mit dem Auto vorbeigekommen und habe dann nach Luftbild eingetragen. 
Könnte natürlich auch ein Güllebehälter sein.

Gruß
Gerd
burrscurr (2024-06-15 19:59:08+00:00): Hi LaBitt,

kannst du, wenn Straßen werden wie beim Straßenzug Wehlener/Österreicher Straße im Tagging auch die Art des Straße erhalten? Konkret, wenn z.B. vorher highway=tertiary getaggt war nicht nur highway=construction sondern auch construction=tertiary zu setzen. Dann bleibt die Information, was für eine Straße im Bau ist klar erhalten und man muss das nicht aus der History der entsprechenden Wege rauskramen, wenn die Straße fertig gebaut ist. (Das ist übrigens auch hilfreich für Mapper, die StreetComplete nutzen. SC fragt dann z.B. "ist diese Straße noch im Bau?". Wenn construction=... fehlt, weiß die App nicht, welcher Wert für highway= gesetzt werden muss, falls die Straße tatsächlich schon wieder frei ist.)

Vielen Dank und weiter frohes Mappen
burrscurr
Glassman (2024-03-29 17:41:22+00:00): There was already a node for Chicha San Chen in the strip mall next to the Cove Salon. I merged your node with the existing one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149287822
joost schouppe (2024-04-03 08:02:45+00:00): Ik heb de verwijderde grb & erfgoed tags hersteld, ik neem aan dat je die per ongeluk had gewist
Xvtn (2024-03-29 20:04:54+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Looks great - Thanks for your contribution!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-28 22:10:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1038065990

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Hufkratzer (2024-04-03 18:58:20+00:00): Tłumaczenie automatyczne:

Dziękuję. To dziwne. Miałem adres ze strony internetowej i z Facebooka, który również dodałem. Usunąłem adres ponownie. Czy to nie jest właściwa strona?
NorthCrab (2024-04-03 19:20:13+00:00): Hej! Ulica nie istnieje bo w tym przypadku nie jest to nazwa ulicy a miejsca. Adres jest już przypisany na budynkach i tam widać addr:place - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/667036196. Nie ma potrzeby tej informacji duplikować :-) Pozdrawiam!
NieWnen (2024-03-29 15:34:27+00:00): Ciut za duży ten budynek tu wyszedł :P
Poprawiłem.
midget sub (2024-03-29 03:57:08+00:00): hello -- the parking lot sidewalks of Savanna's restaurant are *not* part of the UMass Extension of the Norwottuck Rail Trail. Given that they have metal handrails and are on private property they should be mapped as access=private and foot paths. Thanks again for your attention.
midget sub (2024-03-29 03:54:27+00:00): hello -- the paths you are adding on Amherst College campus are behind gates that are generally locked, so access=private. Also, per explicit signage, bicycles are prohibited here (presumably horses and mopeds are as well), so these should be mapped as foot paths. Thanks again for your attention.
goldfndr (2024-04-04 11:44:05+00:00): Given that these are deep inside the state's boundary, is adding the state really desireable?
goldfndr (2024-04-04 12:31:47+00:00): Could you please provide a link for where the consensus for this seemingly mechanical edit (which lacks mechanical edit tags and wasn't created with a separate mechanical edit account) was reached?

I've removed addr:state tags during some of my manual editing per past wiki guidance, but if there's consensus for adding the tag then I'll change my behavior.
TheDutchMan13 (2024-04-04 17:37:23+00:00): I was just completing unfinished addresses, it was a project I did myself. I do not know about any wiki pages prohibiting the state from being added to addresses.
goldfndr (2024-04-07 06:59:33+00:00): I implore you to look through https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct as this changeset (among others) seems non-conformant at first glance; see particularly its **Problematic usage** section.

While there might not be an explicit prohibition on an ad-hoc addition of an easily computable tag, adding (mechanically or otherwise) trivially computable tags tends to go against OSM philosophy, and there really should be discussion before changing the last modified date of thousands of objects, as they suddenly look like they were recently verified; please see https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZrvcVAPdaWI at about 9 minutes in.
TheDutchMan13 (2024-04-07 19:50:59+00:00): Thank you for letting me know about this, I was not aware.
Udarian (2024-03-30 00:25:17+00:00): A few questions here, first of all and most importantly, why did you delete all those ways, they are all parking aisles and the service roads connecting those parking aisles together, all of these are still on the latest imagery “Miami-Dade County Orthoimagery (Latest)” so shouldn’t have been deleted. Second of all, why did you remove the following tags from the gondola station:
aerialway=station
public_transport=station
when on the latest imagery the station is still there along with the gondola so that tagging seems to be correct.
Udarian (2024-04-08 22:34:21+00:00): Since all that parking is still on the latest imagery can you please respond as to why you removed all of them?
lorenzog89 (2024-04-09 07:13:55+00:00): Because from Google's latest satellite images they are dismantling everything.
NieWnen (2024-03-29 14:13:02+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tych zmian? Wcale na ortofotomapie nie widać, tych budynków. W EGiB ani w BDOT również ich nie ma. Z sentinela po części idzie znaleźć, że niektóre mogą być najwyżej w budowie.
unyny (2024-04-05 19:43:42+00:00): Google Earth Pro
NieWnen (2024-04-05 21:44:03+00:00): Niestety, ale nie możemy w OSM korzystać z map Google jako źródła danych.
To nie dozwolone z powodów licencji.

To się tyczy pewnie ich wszystkich produktów maps, street view, earth itp.
Pepe Sánchez de Wu (2024-03-29 20:59:59+00:00): No modifiques mis ediciones. Gracias.
suricata88 (2024-03-29 21:10:23+00:00): Hola, que tal? Cuando mapeamos building=house deberiamos mapear las construcciones en si, no las parcelas:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:building%3Dhouse

Para parcelas debe usarse place=plot

Saludos!
suricata88 (2024-03-29 21:10:36+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:place%3Dplot
LordGarySugar (2024-03-29 03:16:42+00:00): Hi, it looks like the British Geological Survey data is copyrighted, and cannot be used without permission. While you can use the data to find locations where there is a quarry and add it from aerial imagery, you cannot copy names from the map.
BCNorwich (2024-03-29 06:38:33+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Something went wrong here! You mention the Ouse Fen Reserve which is already mapped yet you tag the area you added as residential. As this can't be correct I've removed your mapped area. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2024-03-29 06:40:35+00:00): You also dragged a waterway out of alignment which I've corrected.
Emilius123 (2024-03-28 23:38:29+00:00): 👍👍👍👍👍👍
Emilius123 (2024-03-28 23:38:38+00:00): Gaming
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-28 23:50:39+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11770182629

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-03-31 18:53:55+00:00): Poprawione.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-29 00:21:43+00:00): Please resolve Id issues like disconnected road before uploading.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149291396
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:25:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:23:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
LordGarySugar (2024-03-29 03:06:50+00:00): Did you use Google Streetview?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:22:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:22:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:22:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:26:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:25:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:24:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:24:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:24:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:26:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
felipeeugenio (2024-03-29 14:44:50+00:00): Hola.
Gracias por sus ediciones.
Sin embargo hay una mezcla de conceptos en sus ediciones y comentarios que son contradictorios con OSM.
Esto es un mapa donde se dibuja lo que hay en terreno con los atributos que les corresponde.
Borrar caminos por que están cerrados es incorrecto, pues los caminos y senderos existen. 
Si se encuentran cerrados es un tema de los atributos de los caminos, no de su existencia como tal.
Si acaso usted es el propietario o bien conoce los puntos en donde el acceso está restringido, podemos agregar atributos que así lo reflejen de modo que quienes usan nuestros mapas se encuentren con la etiqueta access=private, pero borrar cosas que si existen porque a alguien no les gusta que lo vean es algo que no se puede aceptar.

Si acaso está interesado, puede dejar notas en el mapa indicando a partir de qué puntos no se puede entrar y dónde se venden los tickets o se registra la entrada a la que hace mención. Por lo pronto se tendrán que reponer los caminos.

Si acaso quiere tener una conversación más fluida, está invitado a unirse al chat de la comunidad de OSM en Chile en Telegram (app muy similar a whatsapp) en el link https://t.me/OSMcl

saludos
Lenny Andreu (2024-03-30 17:03:41+00:00): Hola Felipe Rauld, podrías indicar los puntos donde el camino debiese estar restringido?, eso podría evitar el acceso, al menos a través de aplicaciones que respeten el acceso a zonas restringidas (como lo puede ser un camino privado).
NieWnen (2024-03-29 15:23:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548

To samo co tu, ale w tym proszę również o nietworzenie multipolygonów tam gdzie jest to zbędne:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17401783

Oraz nie sklejanie landuse z granicami administracyjnymi, bo powoduje to przesuwanie się granic, a to nic dobrego.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11770233505
Xvtn (2024-03-29 20:03:35+00:00): Howdy! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great to me, no issues! Just a side note that the access=* tag is understood to apply to all other access-type tags like bicycle=*. So in this case, since we have access=no, bicycle=no is redundant. But it doesn't hurt to be extra explicit.
Thanks for your contributions!
Armando Hasanbelliu (2024-03-29 01:00:58+00:00): Was it stupid to add that many roads, or is it okay?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-16 23:50:11+00:00): Separate ways should only be used where physical separation exists. Otherwise use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149292172
Armando Hasanbelliu (2024-05-17 11:16:47+00:00): Quindi anche se c'è un'isola di traffico avrei solo dovuto usare una way invece di due? Avrebbe tecnicamente senso, ho fatto in questa maniera principalmente perché esteticamente sembra meglio.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-13 23:03:23+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
5m4u9 (2024-03-29 07:00:11+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar el mapa.

Veo que mapeas las paredes de terrenos, lo ideal sería asignar todo el terreno a la etiqueta "place=plot".

Si se quiere dejar como pared, lo ideal sería escoger el elemento línea y no área.
Allison P (2025-05-13 23:43:15+00:00): I think you mixed up the Rookie and Slick tracks at Wahooz
OngoingTalent13 (2025-05-13 23:48:54+00:00): Those are the correct names for the tracks.
Allison P (2025-05-14 00:07:38+00:00): The official map calls the larger track the "Road Track" and the smaller one the Slick/Rookie Track. Do signs on site indicate otherwise?
OngoingTalent13 (2025-05-14 00:13:54+00:00): No they don't. They used to be called those and I didn't know they had their names changed.
Glassman (2024-03-29 19:29:06+00:00): According to the website you added, isn't the landing zone on the east side of Chuckanut Drive? I don't think I've ever seen someone land on the west side.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149292327
Gabriel Wicke (2024-04-01 15:31:46+00:00): The main LZ is on the east side (and has been marked as such for a while), but the bailout is the field I just added. NCSC has an agreement with the field owner in place. Pilots are encouraged to land in the main LZ whenever possible, but if there are any doubts about reaching it, we recommend landing in the bailout rather than chancing it over the power lines. On days with stronger southerly winds or strong sink, it is not uncommon to see several pilots land in the bailout.
Glassman (2024-04-01 19:57:57+00:00): Thanks for the update info. We've watched people take off from Samish Overlook - it's amazing
Gabriel Wicke (2024-04-01 20:03:10+00:00): Yes, it is a great place to fly! The 360 degree views from up high are amazing, even better than from Samish Overlook itself.
rskedgell (2024-03-29 09:21:42+00:00): Thanks for updating these. You might find this resource helpful for public rights of way around you.
https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/progress/bucks/-/stoke-poges/
DorneyLake123 (2024-03-29 01:29:57+00:00): from permissive to customer*
user_7130456 (2024-03-31 03:07:38+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149374906
rodolfovargas (2024-03-29 20:34:35+00:00): Hola Silvana!
Gracias por aportar a OSM

Recuerda que para el mapeo de LOTES o PARCELAS, vamos a utilizar la etiqueta place=plot (con polígonos). Esto puede servir muy bien para un estudio de CATASTRO predial.

La etiqueta barrier=wall (con líneas) se puede utilizar para un estudio de CENSO de viviendas (tipo de pared)

Mientras más datos especificos tengamos, más productivo se convierte el mapa en OpenStreetMap OSM :)
goldfndr (2026-02-17 14:00:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14018810 and others should not have had addr:state set.
TheDutchMan13 (2026-02-17 16:21:39+00:00): fixed
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-03-30 01:35:07+00:00): 好耶，胜古庄一带我一直很头疼要怎么画，谢谢您！
gileri (2024-03-29 08:56:58+00:00): Bonjour,

J'ai dû corriger les horaires de bon nombre de vos commerces.

Il y a souvent 2 problèmes :

- Lors d'ouverture en soirée, qui finit après minuit, vous indiquez par exemple "Mo 15:00-23:59, Tu 00:00-02:00". C'est quasiment juste, mais il y a un trou d'une minute, qui indique que c'est fermé. Ça fait qu'à 23:30, une application indiquera que le commerce ferme dans 30 minutes, alors qu'en fait il reste 2:30.

- Des horaires sont carrément fausses, mais j'ai l'impression que c'est lié au problème précédent.

La solution aux deux serait d'indiquer les horaires comme je l'ai fait sur ce bar par exemple : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4784137436/history/8

Sur OSM, les horaires peuvent déborder d'un jour à l'autre, ce qui correspond d'ailleurs à ce qu'affichent les commerces généralement. Par exemple : "Mo 15:00-02:00".

Plus d'infos ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

Vous pouvez tester la syntaxe des horaires avec ce super outil : https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=Mo%2007%3A00-23%3A00%3B%20Tu-Sa%2007%3A00-01%3A00&lat=49.2094&lon=6.1677&mode=0&DATE=1711702500000

- Il serait bien si possible d'indiquer les horaires lors des jours fériés. Je sais que c'est pas toujours évident, mais au moins indiquer "PH off" ou "PH on" aiderait les visiteurs de vos clients.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2024-03-29 09:39:27+00:00): Bonjour Gileri,

Merci beaucoup pour votre aide et les informations transmises qui vont nous aider à pouvoir corriger ce problème d'horaires.
Bonne journée

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
Xvtn (2024-03-29 20:01:20+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great overall! Only issue I see is that you've left the wikidata tags on there. The wikidata id still links back to Outback Steakhouse, so in this case it's best to just remove it. I went ahead and did that. Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contribution!
pfg21 (2024-05-23 15:08:19+00:00): не путайте заметки с редактировнием карты.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-03-30 09:50:41+00:00): 你在干什么？你删掉了很多居民区（当然，确实画的不太好，有很大修缮空间），并且把公路网络拖的歪歪扭扭的

你最好给出一个比较合理的解释
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149294435
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-03-30 10:09:47+00:00): 哥改名挺快啊，刚刚还是"fff921"，现在就改成"66666好的号灯"了是吧
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-03-30 10:12:03+00:00): 我在 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149344371 中把你改的歪歪扭扭的路稍微调整了一点，改回来了，请你在后续的编辑中务必慎重
user_7130456 (2024-03-31 03:14:01+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149374993
TheSwavu (2024-03-29 07:45:40+00:00): Hi,

I think the oneway on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1267303556/ was back to front.

I have flipped it around, if you really can't turn into Boyd Street then please delete my fix.

Thanks.
Lockstar (2024-03-30 08:02:40+00:00): My error - thanks for fixing
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-31 22:43:13+00:00): whats the source?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149295507
MoiraPrime (2024-04-03 14:44:28+00:00): 1. You only tagged the northern part of DeSoto National Forest
2. This area does not qualify as a leisure=park and is already tagged properly as a protected area.

See this excerpt from the wiki page about leisure=park:
" This tag is intended for (usually urban) parks with managed greenery, located within settlements and nearly always open to general public. Such an area may be known also as metropolitan park, municipal park (North America) or public park, public open space, or municipal gardens (UK)[2]. They are largely a "human-sculpted landscape.""

As such I'm reverting this changeset. If you have any questions, feel free to reply. Please reference the OSM wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org in the future for proper mapping and tagging guidelines.
Herman Lee (2024-04-17 05:40:59+00:00): 请注意，在这个修改集中，将部分公交站点错误编辑了
TuAmigoElEditor (2024-03-29 14:14:18+00:00): Hola, al momento de mapear areas religiosas con uno o mas edificios adentro es necesario la etiqueta "landuse".
Saludos.