piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
APneunzehn74 (2024-04-01 11:04:02+00:00): Ok das caravans=no ist mir rausgerutscht das gehört natürlich und ebenfalls natürlich motovehicle=no usw.
Wie schätzt du dann den anderen Platz ein den ich oben verlinkt habe?
APneunzehn74 (2024-04-01 11:07:16+00:00): Oder diese Platz hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/503655509
giggls (2024-04-01 11:11:26+00:00): Der andere Platz ist ebenfalls diskutabel. Sobald es vollwertige sanitäre Anlagen mit Dusche gibt tagge ich eigentlich nie backcountry. Selbst wenn der Ort jwd ist.

Beispiel: https://opencampingmap.org/node/443051968
APneunzehn74 (2024-04-01 11:22:40+00:00): Ok alles klar, dann ändere ich die drei Plätze ab die wir hier erwähnt haben.
mottiger (2024-03-31 19:05:50+00:00): Should be "added service=driveway". Changeset comment was still saved in JOSM
vojtechzaboril (2024-03-31 19:08:18+00:00): Sry for huge outbox
I forgot to divide it to locations 
31.7738,117.3594
and
47.3699,13.1056
aTarom (2024-04-01 08:20:14+00:00): Hola, muchas gracias por aportar valioso conocimiento local, una duda por favor,
el tag
"monitoring:water"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1267961311/history
¿quizás monitoriza el nivel de agua del embalse?
por si es
"monitoring:water_level"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:monitoring:water_level

Saludos
JDCastro (2024-04-01 18:49:42+00:00): Hola, tienes razón, lo he corregido: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1267961311/history
sampeto (2024-04-02 18:57:45+00:00): Hallo polduran,

willkommen auf OpenStreetMap.
Die Öffnungszeiten, welche du eingetragen hast, stimmen nicht mit denjenigen auf der Website des Shops [0] überein.
War das ein Fehler, oder sind die Informationen auf der Website falsch?

Gruss, sampeto

[0] https://www.fumo-tabaccheria.ch
marczoutendijk_repair (2024-04-03 19:14:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149539606 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
OpenStreetBoy (2024-04-02 14:58:08+00:00): Hi geow, warum sollte man ein gültiges Grundstück als "Brownfield" eintragen? Das macht für mich keinen Sinn. Die ehemalige Villa is weiterhin als abandoned Building eingetragen. Bis es zu einer neuen Nutzung kommt, würde ich es dabei belassen.
geow (2024-04-02 15:27:44+00:00): Hi OpenStreetBoy, danke für dein Feedback. Ich war vor Ort, das ehem. Gebäude ist vollständig bis auf den anstehenden Untergrund entfernt, das Gelände zur Straße eingezäunt und mit "Baustelle, betreten verboten" beschildert. Baubetrieb ist allerdings noch nicht erkennbar, daher denke ich, dass brownfield aufgrund der Vornutzung und jetzigen "Brache" momentan ganz gut passt. Laut Passanten wird mit einer künftigen Wohnbebauung gerechnet, dann natürlich anpassen auf construction. Wärst du damit einverstanden? 
Viele Grüße 
geow
geow (2024-04-02 15:33:55+00:00): Bauzaun ergänzt 🙂
OpenStreetBoy (2024-04-08 06:55:09+00:00): Nach der bisherigen Historie ist hier sicher nicht mit einer (schnellen) Bebauung zu rechnen.
Ich würde das Grundstück einfach unbezeichnet lassen, nur mit der Node für die Hausnummer.
geow (2024-04-08 16:56:54+00:00): Vielleicht zur besseren Vorstellung, am 29.03.2024 sah es dort so aus: 
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/yb6zf7mgogonhax3tnff9/IMG_6002.JPG?rlkey=osl26yi3ylewngxjl8abw3dgo

Ich weiß nicht, wie es bei Euch in Verden mit der Erfassung von "Bauerwartungsland" gehandhabt wird, aber für mich passt der optische Eindruck von landuse=brownfield hier momentan ganz gut. Wenn es im Laufe der Zeit wieder zuwächst, müsste man es anpassen.  Deinen Vorschlag, die Hausnummer auf dem landuse zu ergänzen, finde ich gut.
Viele Grüße, geow
AngocA (2024-04-01 04:40:52+00:00): Hola.
Estas trabajando bastante por la zona de la 127 con Córdoba. Yo he trabajado del otro lado de la 127, podríamos coordinar esfuerzos para mapear. Me cuentas.
NeisBot (2024-04-02 14:04:02+00:00): Hello rafikm0h, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
felipeeugenio (2024-03-31 22:30:03+00:00): Hola, por favor, si un lugar ya no existe no borrar junto con eso la dirección. Ahora hay que recuperar la dirección del Dr. Simi. No hay nada ahí ahora?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-31 20:50:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11776292945

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
maro21 (2024-04-01 11:07:16+00:00): Poprawiłem, przypadkowo się wkleiło
NorthCrab (2024-04-01 16:13:46+00:00): No problem!
JeroenHoek (2024-04-01 06:56:09+00:00): Hij is te koop zelfs:

https://www.funda.nl/koop/leeuwarden/huis-43472445-schrans-92/
E de Wit (2024-04-01 12:45:22+00:00): Klopt en ik ben er vaak langs gelopen zonder weet te hebben van het bestaan van deze kerk.
Filip009 (2024-04-01 09:43:29+00:00): Zdravím, ste si istý, že je tu 45 z 55 vyhradených pre ŤZP? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1267981392
Filip009 (2024-04-01 09:49:14+00:00): Okej, tak je to chyba prekladu. Mohol by ste to teda opraviť aj na ostatných parkoviskách, ktoré ste pridal? Dostupné miesta znamená miesta pre ŤZP. Už som to opravil, s najbližšou aktualizáciou editora by to malo byť jasnejšie.
MxxCon (2024-04-01 06:02:32+00:00): Hello.
Why did you tag this as tourist attraction? Seems like a very strange category for such an organization.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149408222
Filip009 (2024-04-01 09:41:50+00:00): Zdravím, ste si istý, že tadiaľ je možné prejsť autom, že tadiaľ vedie cesta? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241852580
SomeoneElse (2024-04-22 19:51:07+00:00): Just checking - was it deliberate to delete Cornwall Mineral Tramways here (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Kks ) ?
Carnildo (2024-04-01 21:12:46+00:00): These areas may be parts of a park, but they are not themselves parks as OSM understands the concept.  Changeset has been reverted.
Hermannizer (2024-03-31 21:33:42+00:00): This Area is a Park, I worked here for 7 years. It is more park than nature reserve. It is no longer showing up as a park on maps.
Carnildo (2024-04-01 21:14:47+00:00): Changeset has been reverted.
Carnildo (2024-04-01 21:15:01+00:00): Changeset has been reverted.
Carnildo (2024-04-01 21:15:19+00:00): Changeset has been reverted.
jhaluska80 (2024-04-01 20:48:13+00:00): Hello,  I've been working on the Mount Olive area for the last couple months, and saw this change show up in the history.

OSM has a lot of tags and the name tag that you added isn't the correct one for addresses.  I took the liberty of updating it to the correct address tag for you.  This should let routers to use the address.

If gnome-maps doesn't have that option, there are other editors, like the web based ID and JOSM.

If anything looks wrong in the Mountain Ridge area (or anywhere else for that matter), don't hesitate to change it.  I don't know that area well.
Carnildo (2024-04-01 21:15:31+00:00): Changeset has been reverted.
deven_smith_ (2024-04-01 03:59:15+00:00): This and your previous edit have been reverted, while one could call these areas "parks", they are already within the Riverside State Park multi-polygon, which is tagged as a nature preserve because the main purpose of these areas is to preserve the natural area. Please do not make similar edits in this fashion in the future. Feel free to reach out to the local OSM editors like me for clarification on mapping standards in the future. Thanks!
tordans (2024-04-04 14:21:49+00:00): Hallo cjruchay, du hattest um eine Review gebeten. Mir ist aufgefallen, dass die Telefonnummer nicht das richtige Format hat. Mehr unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone .
Außerdem sind die Öffnungszeiten nicht im richtigen Format. Mehr unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours und über das Tool https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?setLng=de
Frohes Mappen!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149408968
YomanNH (2024-04-01 21:06:37+00:00): 1. Co to jest za twór highway=cycleway + foot=designated + bicycle=designated, np. tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1156890620 ?
2. Dlaczego z drogi wspomnianej wyżej i kilku innych w okolicy usunąłeś informację o rodzaju nawierzchni?
3. Dlaczego nadal próbujesz mapować osobno drogi dla pieszych i drogi dla rowerów?

Ponownie sugeruję zapoznać się z podstawami mapowania: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w
michael60634 (2024-04-01 18:22:41+00:00): Hello. I reverted your edit as it's a duplicate of an existing map feature.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149409605
marc__marc (2025-12-13 12:39:26+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3126953150
tu as renseigné qu'il n'y a pas de feu à ce passage piéton. de mémoire si.
n'y aurait-il pas confusion avec le passage piéton quelques plus loin qui désert l’arrêt de tram et qui lui n'est pas protégé par un feu ?
bxl-forever (2025-12-13 13:11:20+00:00): This changeset was 18 months ago, I do not recall the details for every node, but this looks like a mistake.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2110048189479248
I fixed it, thanks.
*abq* (2024-04-28 15:45:02+00:00): Hi Paul,
please bear in mind that a track with surface compacted cannot be smoothness=excellent. This would require e.g. good asphalt. 
Reiner
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-31 22:31:01+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1200341591
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100942882

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
maro21 (2024-04-01 11:10:15+00:00): poprawione
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-31 22:31:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Sienkiewicza":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11776512062

"Piotra Skargi":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11776512065
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11776512115

"księdza Ryszarda Rajskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11776512068

"Żeromskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11776512090

"Wejhera":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11776512095

"Chynowska":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11776512111
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11776512112

"Generała Władysława Sikorskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11776512124

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-04-01 07:04:43+00:00): Poprawione.
RedAuburn (2024-03-31 22:25:46+00:00): *not parking
VLD549 (2024-05-21 15:42:07+00:00): Hi, on the site of the source given, Express is with capital 'e'. Shouldn't we follow the website of the business?
Thank you in advance!

I'm working on the name change from BP Express Schiermonnikoog to BP express Schiermonnikoog
A67-A67 (2024-05-23 17:13:41+00:00): Hi, the brand BP express is written with a lowercase e on the actual petrol stations.

The BP website is inconsistent in the capitalization and therefore cannot be used as a source for this aspect.
VLD549 (2024-06-25 12:43:13+00:00): Ok, thank you.
martien-176 (2024-04-06 12:52:07+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping.

This changeset contains roads that are not existing on the imagery. So i reverted the changeset.

Some other changesets you created also contain errors, eg crossing highways.

Please watch this instruction video on road mapping to improve your mappings: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ 

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-01 02:15:26+00:00): Again, instead of drawing these areas in many pieces to try and simulate holes where this feature doesn't apply, you should consider using multipolygon relations.  I have gone ahead and combined the many areas into one for you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149410854
elsy1 (2024-04-11 09:01:34+00:00): درود دوست گرامی، میشه لطفا توضیح دهید کجای این مکان دارای پوشش جنگلی وسیعی هست که شما تگ جنگل بهش دادید؟
StefanHRT (2024-04-01 03:06:41+00:00): Hallo, Wurden die Schilder mit den 10km/h entfernt?
https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/eserte?lat=52.52652719997201&lng=13.612856299999976&z=17.297224735281016&focus=photo&panos=true&pKey=1370089433439429&x=0.550197235007413&y=0.5482471226574815&zoom=0. VG
StefanHRT (2024-04-01 16:43:24+00:00): Nach Sichtung vor Ort, ob die Beschilderung noch vorhanden ist, wieder auf 10km/h gesetzt da offizielle Straßenschilder.
totera (2024-04-05 22:08:44+00:00): Ciao Fra00, hai cancellato il vecchio tracciato della SS16 a est della rotatoria, ma seppur chiuso da reti esso è ancora fisicamente esistente
walkerchodec (2024-12-23 20:15:26+00:00): V bocnej doline Svarineskej doliny: Drogova dolina, sa chata nenachadza na uvedom mieste, bud sa jedna o chybu v polohe alebo tento objekt neexisutje vobec, overne v terene.
kucai (2024-05-30 03:29:55+00:00): Macam mana nama dia Jalan Permata 3? Ada papan tanda? Di mana pulak jalan permata 1 dan 2?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149411828
Colin Smale (2024-04-01 10:53:16+00:00): Hi! Can you please remember to use barrier=fence and not boundary=fence? Thanks!
VisibleSouth (2024-04-05 04:34:20+00:00): Are these really public toilets, i.e. open to the public (for everyone)? I see numerous entries like this from you in Kilimanjaro/Windhoek ...
nevw (2024-04-30 09:06:20+00:00): I reverted this because it is already mapped.
Please check before you add duplicate data
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-01 02:20:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawną składnię. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres strony internetowej zawiera powtórzone protokoły.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11777101055

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Jakuje (2024-10-28 19:05:04+00:00): Hi, why did you remove the access=private tag from the private roads around Grand Canyon West viewpoint? Did you visit recently? I was there last month and the roads are indeed private and not accessible for general traffic, which ends on the huge parking lots near the tourist center.
It was correctly tagged since the beginning in 2012, until this changeset changed it to public access.
Joseph R P (2024-10-28 20:01:21+00:00): Not sure how I removed them but my guess is that it was accidental. I've readded the tags.
Jakuje (2024-10-28 20:24:06+00:00): Thanks for the prompt reply and fix!
Jarek 🚲 (2025-06-28 20:02:12+00:00): Did you see the changeset comments when they were created? 

"The sidewalks on Allen Rd between Sheppard Ave and Transit Rd are asphalt, clearly meant to act as a multiuse pathway or as a protected bike lane. Thus, I am tagging them as paths so that navigation apps can take advantage of them. " https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1166193150/history/2

" Based on street-level photos, it is apparent that the asphalt "sidewalks" alongside Allen Rd between Sheppard Ave and Transit Rd are meant to act as one-way multiuse paths shared by cyclists and pedestrians. Allen Rd itself allows bikes until Transit Rd. " https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1166193150/history/3

You changed them to sidewalk tagging but that excludes bicycles again
Jarek 🚲 (2025-06-28 20:09:31+00:00): Or if based on your survey these are not suitable or allowed for bicycle use, can you discuss with DaveTO in one of those changesets, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135488466 ?
skfd (2025-06-28 21:28:42+00:00): ohh thanks for the commwnt i will survey for signs and mark if it is bikeable explicitly
skfd (2025-06-29 22:43:36+00:00): Walked from Sheppard down to Transit Road. Right away there is RB-68 sign above this sidewalk -- No Pedestrians, No Bicycles. Then later at the intersection with Sheppard Station parking exists Sidewalk Closed sign.
My verdict -- it's a sidewalk, bikes are explicitly prohibited. I would say -- mark it as foot=private, bike=no.
Andrew Kvalheim (2024-04-02 05:02:24+00:00): Thanks for working on this!

For this kind of change I think it’s important to document which imagery you used as a reference since the various options aren’t all in agreement. You can do this with the source and/or imagery_used tags on the changeset.

Much of Seattle’s building alignment issues appear to have originated with the 2013 import and it would be nice to come to a broader consensus on what to do about it.

In this case it looks like you aligned to the current Bing aerial imagery. If you haven’t yet, do also consider King County orthoimagery which seems to be of high quality but differs in alignment from Bing. I’ve been meaning to do a more thorough comparison but haven’t personally gotten to it yet.
Lumikeiju (2024-04-02 05:18:36+00:00): Thanks for the feedback - I'll definitely include which imagery was used in future similar changesets' tags!

I was using the King County Orthoimagery as my "authoritative" alignment for a bit (and still use it very often, especially because the 2021 imagery was taken when many trees hadn't grown back their leaves) but received a message from another prolific Seattle-area mapper saying that it's better to use Bing as a reference and that is the local convention, so I've been following that since then.

In JOSM, I set the offset for the 2021 King King County Orthoimagery to "-1.7915,0.8959"

I also wanted to try recording some GPX tracks over time and figuring out a "perfect" alignment (but the hills make that impossible) however I only have my phone's GPS, which I can't really rely on for perfect accuracy.
Andrew Kvalheim (2024-04-02 05:36:04+00:00): Ah that’s reasonable, thanks for the explanation.

I did get as far as acquiring a slightly more precise GPS device but got lost going down the rabbit hole of identifying survey markers and interpreting government control point datasets.
okadatsuneo (2024-04-12 11:49:48+00:00): 9854458923さん、こんにちは。
耕作地に「耕作地」という名前付けは不要です。固有名詞がついている場合に使用します。
MxxCon (2024-04-01 06:14:02+00:00): Hello.
Please update your StreetComplete app. The version you are using is pretty old. There have been many improvements since then.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149414345
brightj (2024-04-01 13:58:27+00:00): OK I was using a development version that was recommended at some point
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-04-09 01:06:22+00:00): Hi bạn, nhà nước mới cắm biển cấm quẹo trái tất cả các phương tiện từ Nguyễn Tri Phương qua Nguyễn Trãi hả? Bạn có hình ảnh hay gì để xác nhận không?
Jarek 🚲 (2025-05-22 17:47:48+00:00): Hi skfd,

You added some foot=use_sidepath tags on roadways in Toronto. This tag refers to a _legal_ requirement for pedestrians to use a sidewalk if there is one present. I was unable to find such a law in Ontario, or a bylaw in Toronto specifically. Could you comment on https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/foot-use-sidepath-in-ontario/129980 if you know such a law?

Thanks,
--Jarek
Emilius123 (2024-04-01 03:55:57+00:00): ZickZackV4 wie BastiGHG
tekim (2024-04-01 13:44:40+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM)!  Thanks for your edits to the map. Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Maps  (or Google Street View) when editing OSM due to Google's terms of use.
tekim (2024-04-01 13:45:03+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149435881
Robin Zyx (2024-04-01 04:38:59+00:00): I'm confused. Someone deletes this location? AFAIK, it is still in business and their website is advertising shows next weekend.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149415388
MxxCon (2024-04-01 04:42:44+00:00): Yes, in changeset 149353815 it was deleted and before that in changeset 149353771 it was marked as closed. I reverted deletion so that at least the node with its history remains. But if you know that this biz is actually open, feel free to correct this.
Robin Zyx (2024-04-01 04:54:34+00:00): Changesets 149353815 and 149353771 were filed one minute apart yesterday morning by someone apparently in Seattle.

I'm the person who first added the POI to OSM back at the start of February after I was passing by one night and noticed it was there and open.

But I haven't been down that direction in a couple weeks. Will try to pay attention next time I am.
MxxCon (2024-04-01 04:59:50+00:00): They maybe are from Seatle, but that doesn't really matter.
They have 11k edits, account is over 10 years old, and they used "Go Map!!" to make those changes. "Go Map!!" is iOS counterpart to desktop iD and Android's Vespucci. So, it's possible that they were there in person, saw that it was closed and marked it.
Robin Zyx (2024-04-01 05:26:22+00:00): This might actually make sense. Stand Up NY is moving or has moved out of that address. They are supposedly opening two other locations, one of which is in the Times Square area and is another POI that that person was editing. However, he did not change the name on the TS POI so I don't know what's up with that.

They have not yet updated their website with the new address(es) info, etc., but that's no surprise at all.

Another comedy club is supposed to move into the 78th St location, but I haven't found further details on whether that deal has closed and when they might move in.
tekim (2024-04-01 13:45:29+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149435918
ivanbranco (2024-04-18 09:32:21+00:00): Hi ir0nM1ke,

is this really a separate building under an existing building? or is part of the same building? in the second case building:part=yes instead of building=* should be used
ir0nM1ke (2024-04-19 19:17:31+00:00): Thank you so much for your proposal. It is indeed part of the building (a room inside of it).
tekim (2024-04-01 14:40:52+00:00): You can't use Google Maps to "confirm" information or as a "supplemental" source.  This edit still violates Google's terms of use, just removing Google Maps as a source doesn't make it "right"
elipoloos (2024-04-04 04:02:50+00:00): As I said, in the strictest sense I did use Google and AllHomes as supplemental sources; however, and this is key, not a single edit would be any different had I not touched Google Maps or AllHomes ~at all~. I simply added them as a courtesy, and because I am a new editor I was unaware of Google and the Domain Group's copyright policies. I apologise for any misunderstanding from my wording in the changeset note.
Thanks and apologies again.
tekim (2024-04-04 19:24:23+00:00): Google Maps terms of use make no distinction between use in the "strict sense" and regular "use", nor does it indicate that using it as a "supplemental source" is ok.  It doesn't matter if "not a single edit would be different" if you had not used Google Maps, the fact is, you used it, and that is a violation of the terms of use.  There was nothing wrong with the wording in your changeset source.  You were honest and admitted that you used Google Maps.  As a new user you can be forgiven for using Google Maps, but reinstating the edits once you have been made aware of the facts is a different matter.
elipoloos (2024-04-05 06:40:45+00:00): Ok that makes sense I see. How do I go about fixing it then? Do I double check everything without Google? Because you could say I already did that, because I had more than one source for the addresses I used. Namely, the address data comes from SixMaps, but also from Bing Maps, which I used as a triple check on top of Google Maps.
nevw (2024-04-05 10:54:14+00:00): Bing Maps is also not suitable as a source for osm.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing_Maps
elipoloos (2024-04-05 12:21:04+00:00): well oh dang it :/ I need to learn how to check licensing clearly lmao. what now then? I delete 2 weeks of work?