piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Martini097 (2026-06-22 08:42:42+00:00): @mueschel
i've made the changes - could you please double-check them as the JOSM validator had warnings related to whitespaces/special characters
mueschel (2026-06-22 08:48:17+00:00): Not quite - the whole condition goes to the value, not to the key:

Key:
access:lanes:forward:conditional

Value:
yes @ (licence = AU:QLD:limousine)||
Martini097 (2026-06-22 08:55:31+00:00): thanks for your patience. i've just submitted the updated keys. If i've still not quite got it correct please change them as you see fit - many thanks for your help so far
nevw (2026-06-15 06:18:23+00:00): Hi, you have added 3 defibrillators to this position. Are there 3 here or should 2 be deleted?
❤️‍🔥 (2026-06-16 10:31:45+00:00): hi, please don't draw roads ontop of existing roads. instead, you'll need to split the road by selecting a point along the road, and right clicking, then pressing split.
Nick Xia (2026-06-20 21:37:25+00:00): Thanks, I'll review all the changes I have made
Glassman (2026-06-16 02:23:49+00:00): #TIP: street names are spelled out in OSM, the reason is that software has a hard time with abbreviations. Can you update the street names on the building and road you added?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184116716
PRidge (2026-07-17 14:59:05+00:00): This camera has been moved to the Pine Ridge community playground located at 32°14'28.0"N 80°54'02.1"W
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-15 05:43:00+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the name real?
Lunnastationery (4634440761), v3
Sadara Maps (2026-06-15 05:59:13+00:00): Yeah, it's real thats my store 😊
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-15 06:19:36+00:00): Thanks for your reply.
duustin (2026-06-16 03:41:38+00:00): Whoopsie, what did I break? That's what I get for craning over my phone for an hour and using Vespucci.
ratrun (2026-06-16 16:06:11+00:00): Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7086669843 was not connected.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-25 08:36:16+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and other mistagging for POI in changeset 184571661

https://osm.org/changeset/184571661
Tewuzij (2026-06-15 19:53:42+00:00): Check Sentinel-2 imagery again please, the intersection has been changed. Esri imagery is outdated for this area
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-06-16 14:39:36+00:00): Mình kiểm tra r, thực ra nếu đúng thì nó như mình sửa trong changeset ấy, mình tra đúng Sentinel-2 rồi bạn, có thể hơi mờ nên chưa rõ thôi chứ nó đúng thế
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-06-16 14:41:04+00:00): Bạn xem kĩ lại thì sẽ thấy là nó như mình sửa ấy
Tewuzij (2026-06-17 04:16:13+00:00): OK
Tewuzij (2026-06-17 04:17:06+00:00): Please select the one 4 weeks ago or later to get the most updated imagery
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-06-17 09:15:53+00:00): Ok bạn nhé
HellMap (2026-06-15 12:03:20+00:00): Hello,

Please don't draw building parts as multiple separate buildings, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1529531795 . If you want to specify individual building parts, then these need to be additional ways with building:part=*.
mrmaxguns (2026-06-15 21:14:01+00:00): Understood
spatialia (2026-06-25 16:58:45+00:00): Hi Sarya, just wanted to say thank you for also tagging your imagery source! I had added the POI and some of the mapillary data on the ground here previously, but didn't have a good aerial source to add the roads. Really helpful to have you add it and tag your imagery as Vexcel. Thank you!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 10:00:22+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, possibly sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184129039

https://osm.org/changeset/184129039
aliensuperstar (2026-07-03 03:20:47+00:00): @MappsterMind no sé de dónde sacaste estas nomenclaturas incorrectas en Cumbres III, pero yo me di a la tarea de recorrer esas calles y hablar con vecinos y documentar los nombres. Como no pones más que un punto "." en tus resúmenes de edición, no queda claro qué cambias y cómo, ni la procedencia de tu información.
aliensuperstar (2026-07-06 23:55:40+00:00): @MappsterMInd no sé de dónde sacaste estas nomenclaturas incorrectas en Cumbres III, pero yo me di a la tarea de recorrer esas calles y hablar con vecinos y documentar los nombres. Como no pones más que un punto "." en tus resúmenes de edición, no queda claro qué cambias y cómo, ni la procedencia de tu información. Además, no sigues la directriz de etiquetado mexicana, disponible en el wiki, que estipula que se debe poner el tipo de vialidad en el nombre de cada vía. Cuidado con la ortografía también.
eggie (2026-06-15 10:41:34+00:00): Dag Carto. Je hoeft niet toe te vcoegen dat je mag fietsen of lopen op een fietspad.
Wel van belang is het om de juiste fietspadtags toe te voegen.
Zie G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway


Mapse
eggie (2026-06-15 10:43:33+00:00): Beter geen parallelvoetpaden intekenen. Dat routeert niet. Wel kun je aangeven sidewalk=right, left of both
Ik heb wat aangepast. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-06-15 10:38:07+00:00): Dag Carto,

Ik heb de BAG data weer toegevoegd.

MVG
eggie
felipeeugenio (2026-06-15 11:43:41+00:00): Hola. Mapeamos la base de los edificios, no los techos, que aparecen muchas veces corridos por el ángulo de la foto.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184120706
eggie (2026-06-15 09:36:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback   De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
user_23884811 (2026-06-15 07:06:14+00:00): Merhaba. Kapalı gorunen yol hangisiydi?
gurglypipe (2026-06-15 14:40:16+00:00): Hiya, welcome to OSM. Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304409139, are you sure this is a building? From aerial imagery it very much looks like a garden. Has there been new construction recently? If so, we can annotate the area on the map to make it clear that the aerial imagery is out of date. Thanks.
RW_Marloe (2026-06-16 06:35:15+00:00): Hi, Thank you for the welcome gurglypipe. I live in the area, so I can say as I am so far aware, the square yard behind Shinglers is a garden. Thanks.
gurglypipe (2026-06-16 09:29:53+00:00): Super, thanks for confirming.

I see you’ve already changed it back to being a garden in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184166992 — thanks!

Happy editing :)
Piskvor (2026-06-15 10:10:33+00:00): Dobrý den, 

Úplně mi z té editace není jasný reálný stav. Problém je tedy v tom, že je to  neprůjezdné, nebo že tam je nějaký typ zákazu, nebo že některá ta část tam vůbec není? 

V tuto chvíli je to (Vámi) vyznačeno jako "silnice existuje, ale absolutně nikdo sem nesmí, ani rezidenti." Pokud je tam nějaký typ zákazu vjezdu, prosím upřesněte, jaký a kde; pokud je tam fyzická bariéra, mohu ji do mapy doplnit. Pokud některá část cesty vůbec neexistuje (nebo je to něčí příjezdovka, za plotem, nebo něco jiného), i to mohu doplnit. 

Pokud dobře odhaduju z leteckých snímků (lepší data nemám), tak K Hájku není průjezdná ani průchozí do Náhorní; ta část od K Hájku na sever taky není průjezdná ani průchozí? Ale z Návršní do Nad Zámkem i do Nachové se projet smí? Takhle bych to aspoň odhadl "od stolu." 

Každopádně díky za zpřesnění mapy. 
S pozdravem, 
Piskvor
Piskvor (2026-06-15 10:15:41+00:00): (zajímavé na tom je, že ta ulice Náhorní je takhle - chybně? - zakreslena 13 let. Možná se něco změnilo v okolí? Podívám se večer, jestli někdo omylem nezmapoval zákaz průjezdu po Štiřínské, nebo tak něco)
Iv Re (2026-06-15 13:19:28+00:00): viz mapy.com, tam je to správně
Piskvor (2026-06-15 14:49:37+00:00): Z těch to vzít nemůžu, jejich licence to nedovoluje. Ale udělám si cestu a mrknu na to na místě... prozatím to upravím podle Vašich poznámek v terénu.
Iv Re (2026-06-15 17:37:24+00:00): Situace = slepá neprůjezdná oblast je stejná 25 let beze změny.
Piskvor (2026-06-15 18:57:55+00:00): Upraveno podle katastru a ortofotomapy. V mapě by to mělo být vidět do pár hodin; v navigacích se to postupně projeví taky - předpokládal bych, že to jsou nějaké, které používají data z OpenStreetMap.
Piz Pachific (2026-06-15 08:54:46+00:00): So viele Fachgeschäft für Türen? ;-) Ich nehme an, da hast du den falschen Tag erwischt und meintest wohl indoor=door
Piz Pachific (2026-06-15 08:56:57+00:00): Auch sollten beschreibende Namen nicht verwendet werden (wie z.B. name=Lift). Nimm die entsprechenden Tags, welche genug deklarativ sind.
Mapper-Jonas (2026-06-15 09:01:23+00:00): Vielen Dank für das Feedback, bin noch etwas grün hinter den Ohren was das Mappen angeht. Nicht direkt, es war eine Vorlage für Türen im Editor, aber der Tag shop=doors hatte mich auch etwas verwirrt.
Piz Pachific (2026-06-15 09:07:35+00:00): Kein Problem, jeder hat mal klein angefangen :-) Grundsätzlich ist bei OSM das Wiki eine gute Referenz. Evt. kannst du dich dort mal bzgl. dem Indoor Mapping einlesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indoor_Mapping
Mapper-Jonas (2026-06-15 10:26:27+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, werd ich machen.
Piz Pachific (2026-06-16 12:36:45+00:00): Ich bin kein Indoor Mapping Experte, aber evt. wären dazu auch die OST Gebäude in Rapperswil als Referenz hilfreich. Danke auch für die bereits getätigten Korrekturarbeiten.
habi (2026-06-15 10:02:28+00:00): Ciao Jonas
Du hast hier 10 mal `shop=doors` erfasst.
Ich glaube nicht, dass hier im OST-Turm 10 Läden sind, die Türen verkaufen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Ddoors
Sollte das eher https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:indoor%3Ddoor sein?
Gruss,
habi

PS: Ich bin hier wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5333974
Mapper-Jonas (2026-06-15 10:52:41+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, ich wurde bereits darauf angesprochen und ja die Tags sollten indoor=door sein.
Die Korrektur der Tags habe ich, heute vor den Mittag, erledigt. Mit der nächsten Aktualisierung, sollten sie nun stimmen.
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-16 06:03:40+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184042132
ieguy3 (2026-06-15 08:39:21+00:00): the land between the homes and the blm parcels are hoa open space. but they haven't paid taxes on it for 5 years
ieguy3 (2026-06-15 08:40:44+00:00): in one of the parcles they owe the county 20k
TrickyFoxy (2026-06-22 22:22:31+00:00): Что вы имели в виду?
poddavan (2026-06-23 01:04:29+00:00): На отроге хребта стоит металлический контейнер, раньше там было оборудование для радиосвязи. Удобный ориентир при переходе.
Tomas Straupis (2026-06-15 08:46:23+00:00): Na bet žiauriai daug klaidų... topologija visiškai išdraskyta, persiengimai, tarpai. Gal geriau mažiau, bet kokybiškesnių pakeitimų daryti?
FajrAl (2026-06-15 11:31:05+00:00): Hai, beberapa suntingan ada yang tidak menggunakan #Kaart, apakah ini artinya suntingan ini bukan dari program Kaart?
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-15 09:21:41+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edit. 

It looks like the added name:el on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7340060 may be incorrect: the object is Manhattan Community Board 5, but the Greek name says “Μανχάταν 6” / Manhattan 6. 

Could you please check and either remove name:el or correct it if you have a Greek-language source? 

Thanks!
ToniE (2026-06-15 11:04:23+00:00): Exakt.

Wegen des Schildes DE:240 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:traffic_sign%3DDE:240 käme dann noch "segregated"="no" hinzu.

Bei DE:241 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:traffic_sign%3DDE:241 ein "segregated"="yes"

Gruß
Toni
Markt Holzkirchen (2026-06-15 12:00:20+00:00): Top, Danke für den Hinweis/die Unterstützung wiederum :-)
eggie (2026-06-15 09:31:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Svp alleen de adresnode gebuiken om bedrijven op bij te taggen. Dus niet dubbeltaggen. Ik pas even wat aan.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Kalemillion (2026-06-20 19:19:03+00:00): According to the Transilien departure board (https://www.transilien.com/fr/horaires/prochains-departs/?uicDeparture=8754519&departure=Br%C3%A9tigny&uicArrival=8754524&arrival=Juvisy), northbound through RER C services are normally scheduled to depart from platform 4 (track 2 bis).
Bovi887 (2026-06-21 08:10:00+00:00): Thanks! Fixed, including platform and tracks: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184379492#map=11/48.6481/2.2108
Kalemillion (2026-06-16 18:43:34+00:00): Hello, according to Transilien (https://www.transilien.com/fr/horaires/prochains-departs/?uicDeparture=8754513&departure=%C3%89tampes&uicArrival=8754524&arrival=Juvisy), all northbound RER C services from Saint-Martin-d'Étampes normally depart from Platform 4 (track 2 bis) under regular operations.
Bovi887 (2026-06-16 20:03:53+00:00): Thanks for letting me know. I changed it because the stop was not on the tracks included in the route. I've changed it back now, including the tracks: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184198489
ika-chan! (2026-06-21 09:16:23+00:00): Hello, I think we do not map the road as a dual carriageway (at 40.396315,-1.189155) if there is no physical separation between the carriageways. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway for more information.
ika-chan! (2026-06-29 15:10:16+00:00): Due to lack of reply or explanation (like providing evidence of physical separation), part of the changeset (at coordinates 40.396315,-1.189155) was undone at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184800944.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-25 08:37:34+00:00): Cleaned up tagging for POI in changeset 184571711

https://osm.org/changeset/184571711
9_tab (2026-06-15 11:14:38+00:00): There may be a technical issue with your script: The changeset remains open after the edit. Please make sure it tries to close it.


Further, please find below a revised questionnaire about the 'daily' maintenance routine. Previous version was at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183679206 


When you have a moment, could you kindly compile a summary on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org ? If you can't answer some questions, you can just note that.

- Objective: What does this routine achieve, and what are its limitations?

- Countries covered: Which countries should this cover?

- Route coverage: Is the coverage clearly defined? Which Flixbus routes are included, and which are excluded? Are all routes still active, and what happens to routes that are currently not in service?

- Significance of ways: Are the included ways meaningful, or are they merely potential routes between endpoints? If several are possible, does it just pick one randomly?

- Alternative modeling: If the ways are not actual routes, what alternatives have been considered instead?

- Types of checks conducted: What specific checks do you (or the program) perform as part of this routine?

- Support from Flixbus: How is this routine supported by Flixbus, if at all?

- Data verification: Is there a method to cross-verify this data with other sources, such as the Flixbus schedule?

- Timing: How frequently is this "daily" routine running? Is it running/updating autonomously? 


Given the understanding that these routes are generally considered to have limited utility and may introduce technical challenges due to the addition of numerous ways to relations, a answers to the above can clarify things.
aceman444 (2026-06-15 16:06:12+00:00): Hi, thanks for trying to fix the Flixbus routes, that are always broken in some way. I understand it is your hobby activity and mostly mechanical fixes to get the routes to be consecutive road segments.

Where can we find an official timetable to check the bus lines validity which whould also contain the line numbers (ref of routes)?

It seems aside the mechanical fixes nobody updates the Flixbus routes in OSM, as e.g. Bratislava station (AS Nivy) (where about 10 lines run through) is missing from many of the routes because the bus station was relocated several years ago (!) and nobody bothered to update the routes. I have fixed some of the routes already, but with just guesswork as I do not have the official timetables.
9_tab (2026-06-17 09:40:41+00:00): @adamos: thanks for the detailed response.

1. What supports "The ways included in the relations represent the actual [...] route the bus takes on public roads"? Is this based solely on what appears most logical on OSM?

2. How do you verify "official Flixbus route (when known)"?

3. I checked routes around Geneva on https://www.flixbus.de/track and some of the streets shown aren't even open for traffic. Perhaps route quality is better in your primary mapping area.

4. In a forum discussion, a mapper observed that his driver used his GPS and did not follow what's on our map.

5. Also, I made a similar observation as @aceman444: stops might no longer be at existing locations even when the route remains active.

6. To clarify data quality for users, we could add a note or description to the relations, for example:

"Start, end and stop locations have not been verified; this route may be out of service and does not necessarily reflect the actual path to be taken."

I can draft a standard note we can reuse. 

7. The area you are mapping in detail is that limited to the Czech Republic?
adamos (2026-06-17 14:51:38+00:00): Thanks for the feedback and for checking the routes around Geneva. Improvements are always welcome.
1. Yes, by “most logical” I mean the route that makes the most sense on OSM (main roads, sensible turns, etc.). There are occasional ways to see the actual Flixbus route via their tracker, but I don’t systematically cross-check existing relations with it. When I notice a gap in a relation, in 99 % of cases it’s obvious how to fix it. The remaining 1 % I handle case by case.
2. When you select a city on a Flixbus line and are lucky enough that a bus is currently running, you can track it here: https://www.flixbus.de/track. Again, this is all manual work — no automation.
3. You’re right, the data shown on the tracker isn’t perfect. Unfortunately I’m not aware of a better public source. In the end, local knowledge remains the best reference.
4. Yes, that’s possible.
5. Yes, also possible. When I have time I plan to focus a bit on Bratislava as well.
6. A standard note/disclaimer sounds like a good idea. I wouldn’t do a bulk update of all Flixbus relations right now (there are hundreds of them, and many other bus networks in OSM have similar data quality issues), but I’m happy to add it when I edit individual relations. Feel free to draft a proposed wording and we can refine it together.
7. As you know, the Czech Republic is my home country, so most of my local knowledge naturally goes into improving local bus connections.
aceman444 (2026-06-17 20:55:26+00:00): I have "fixed" the Flixbus routes in Bratislava, so that those that targeted the old central bus station now stop in the new one (AS Nivy). It was a mechanical fix as I do not have a source to check if the particular bus line still stops there or is in any way valid. Some are also tagged to stop at Most SNP in Bratislava, which is unclear if really both stops are served. Yes, the line connecting just Bratislava and Vienna may do so, but not the more long haul ones. If you can check it better please do so. Thanks.
9_tab (2026-06-18 08:10:02+00:00): With (3.), I was trying to say that I don't think https://www.flixbus.de/track shows the actual route. You could check it by searching for street segments in your area that have temporary restrictions or recent constructional changes.

For (6.), I'd add the description="The start, end, and stop locations have not been verified. This route may be out of service for an extended period and may not match the actual route."

For (7.), it might make sense to handle the ones you follow in detail differently from others. I had contacted the mapper who created some around Geneva. Apparently, he hadn't been maintained them since Covid. In general, OSM seems to prefer not to include historic bus routes.
literan (2026-06-15 18:16:42+00:00): есть же https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/building=clinic
solenoid jam (2026-06-15 19:20:59+00:00): Ок, буду использовать
旧加卷 (2026-06-17 03:35:50+00:00): way/732170506 has already been marked as demolished. Please verify before making those edits.
Karma Howlin (2026-06-17 05:52:16+00:00): The road is still remined on Esri World Imagery, 2026/05/02 version, it didn't show demolished. Please provide the proof of demolished.
旧加卷 (2026-06-17 08:36:16+00:00): For this particular zone, no imagery dated 2026/05/02 is available for Esri World Imagery. The latest Esri World Imagery was captured on 2025/01/03 of the 2025/11/20 version.
Sentinel-2 imagery of this area:
https://browser.dataspace.copernicus.eu/?zoom=17&lat=24.56072&lng=118.37761
Aerial view of this area:
https://weixin.qq.com/sph/Ay41Enossl (https://www.douyin.com/video/7623743762850387840)
FajrAl (2026-06-15 11:25:45+00:00): Apa yang dimaksud "bad route"? Apakah jembatannya sedang dalam perbaikan? Apakah ada sumber berita mengenai penutupan jalannya?
rblldnk (2026-06-16 07:05:02+00:00): Jembatan di Jalan Nelayan Ujung (arah ke Jalan Siak II), Kelurahan Sri Meranti, Kecamatan Rumbai, Pekanbaru putus dan amblas lebih dari 1 meter akibat pergerakan tanah.
Bisa cek di beberapa artikel pekanbaru, berikut salah satu contoh artikel terbarunya.

https://riaupos.jawapos.com/pekanbaru/2606150054/jembatan-ambruk-di-jalan-nelayan-wako-pekanbaru-agung-nugroho-pastikan-jembatan-darurat-segera-dipasang#google_vignette
FajrAl (2026-06-15 11:24:17+00:00): Pastikan untuk membaca pesan saya
Tatfahren (2026-06-15 10:46:04+00:00): Du hast soeben https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23801847/history wegen deinem wandrer.earth orientierten mapping vom Wegenetz abgetrennt. Vergesse nicht das auch der Landwirt den highway=track nutzen darf, und nicht nur du mit dem Fahrrad nicht dort lang fahren möchtest. Wenn du diesen Sommer dort mit der Sense mähen möchtest kannst du das gerne wieder zu path ändern, ich setze diesen Änderungssatz jetzt abr erstmal zurück!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184130857
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184129737
DD-derfred (2026-06-15 19:44:43+00:00): Inwiefern habe ich den Weg abgetrennt ? Es sind doch alle Merkmale erhalten geblieben, zudem würde der Editor doch anzeigen, wenn es keinen Anschluß gibt.
Tatfahren (2026-06-15 19:49:35+00:00): Du hattest "hw=track" zu "hw=path" geändert, ein Weg für den einspurigen, nicht motorisierten Verkehr.
JezCrow (2026-06-15 12:24:46+00:00): Hi yashvii, welcome to OpenStreetMap. I'm not sure what your intentions were here, but it seems unlikely to me that the LexisNexis headquarters and The Farringdon Tap buildings have both been demolished? I have therefore reverted this changeset, but there's lots of help available from the community should you need it.
isotopicemoting (2026-06-18 20:47:48+00:00): Bonsoir, I noticed that the tag l=y on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13942341929 seems like a mistake since it's the only use of that key (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/l).
ajulien (2026-06-18 22:37:33+00:00): Bonsoir, merci de m'avertir. Je pense que j'ai du me louper avec l'autocomplétion, et vouloir mettre "layer" -> "-1", comme le banc d'à côté (pour montrer qu'ils sont sous le pont, et pas posés dessus au milieu de la route…). C'est corrigé.
FajrAl (2026-06-15 15:53:09+00:00): Jadikan fitur jalannya yang sebagai jembatan, bukan sungainya yang dijadikan gorong-gorong
ljc_jlyb (2026-06-15 16:31:44+00:00): 何谓考古
渤海西岸 (2026-06-15 11:31:46+00:00): 我最近开工新军屯和欢喜庄了，这两天暂时先不要弄这两个地方
eggie (2026-06-15 16:17:13+00:00): Door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus is schade ontstaan. De parkeerplaats van de brandweerkazerne lag dwars over Donk heen.
Het is hersteld.
MVG
eggie
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-15 12:15:49+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Are the added names real?
Road_4 (760514031), v5
Road_11 (760514033), v7
MdukaNtuli (2026-07-07 05:23:42+00:00): Good day. Thanks for checking. These are temporary road/street names. The intent is to produce a village map to enable residents to identify where their house is. This will be followed by a consultation process to allocate proper street names.