piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
grzegorz75jan (2025-03-22 10:11:31+00:00): To mógłbyś się chamie normalnie wypowiedzieć a nie pisać w taki sposób. 

Parę razy zwracano ci uwagę oraz DWG wysłało ci upomnienie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161128841#map=18/54.185100/15.584056&layers=N niestety dotyczące tylko tzw. opisów zmian w twoim wykonaniu które masz jak widać w nosie.

W tym układzie trzeba im przypomnieć o takiej wielkiej  personie.
dadavid (2024-06-06 08:54:18+00:00): Hi sts0808, 

ich habe dieses Objekt entfernt, da es nicht dem OSM Tagging-Schema entspricht. Außerdem wird es so niemand finden können. Anstatt als "name" einfach eine Frage einzutragen, nutze besser das fixme tag [1] oder die Karten-Notes [2]. Ich hoffe, damit findest du dann auch eine Antwort auf deine Frage und vielleicht bekommst du ja wieder Lust, weiter zu mappen :) 

Viele Grüße und viel Spaß

David

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:fixme

[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Notes

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152320400
Frans S (2024-03-28 09:37:27+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
One of the validator jobs is to reviews the taggings of highways .  Experience earns that traces of highways are regularly wrong tagged.

How to decide when a trace is a path or an unclassified highway (main choices in rural areas)
First, look what they connect.  Houses, settlements, villages. Then measure the width of that trace.

In iDeditor 

Shortcut : Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle  opens measurement panel
Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.
If a trace is max 2 meters wide, tag it as a path.
Wider and connect hamlets, houses and villages should be tagged as unclassified.
Tag residential in urban areas (villages, towns)

In JOSM, use the measure tab or, draw a circle (round building, shortcut Alt-Z when the building plugin is installed)) between the shoulders of a trace and read the distance on the lower toolbar. (don't map that bulding)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
This is mentioned about tracks on the
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routing#Routing_considerations

Quote: Tracks are roads of agricultural purpose. They usually connect fields to farms. The surface sometimes makes them inaccessible for regular cars, or at least limits the speeds to a very slow pace. Tracks should always be avoided for through-going traffic or within urban areas.

Best regards
Vinber-Pro (2024-04-02 14:47:34+00:00): Salut,
peux tu mettre les commerces dans les batiments et pas devants stp ?

je viens d'en recaler quelques uns, surtout pour les prochains

merci pour toutes ces contributions
Frans S (2024-03-28 09:35:08+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Difficult objects to map here.
You mapped courtyards as a building.
Often buildings here exist of walls (combined with buildings) around a courtyard.
Try to map the contours  (even with walls mapped)
Or as a bigger building (including surrounding walls) and map the courtyards as multypolygon.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149231928
DaveF (2024-08-28 16:29:31+00:00): Hi
Why is there no access to this path?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1266817228
cxc (2024-03-28 15:04:38+00:00): Buongiorno... la località perticata è posta (dove era posizionata) a sud del punto indicato ... sulla base di cosa sposti ( esempio bonascola... ) i punti ?
Frans S (2024-03-28 09:28:47+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
The objects you mapped here are no buildings but pieces of farmland, separated by (probably) a hedge or something like that.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149232854
bielebog (2024-04-12 19:47:31+00:00): Das except=bus gehört an die schon existierende Abbiegebeschränkung https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13887326 . Einen Namen braucht die nicht.
Die neu erstellte Abbiegebeschränkung https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17395801 kann wieder gelöscht werden.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-27 16:30:22+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184994210
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1266826860

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
KingAsverus (2024-03-27 16:45:11+00:00): Dziękuję za zwrócenie uwagi. To dopiero moja druga edycja w osm. Już usunąłem duplikat. Pozdrawiam.
Polarbear (2024-04-27 18:10:05+00:00): Hallo kampari,
ich verstehe deine Änderung nicht. 
Du hast einen Verkaufsautomaten mitten im Edeka-Gebäude auf indoor=no gesetzt. Auf dem Dach wird er ja wohl nicht sein? 
Gibt es ihn überhaupt noc, wo genau im Verkaufsraum ist er?
yasslay (2024-08-14 11:51:42+00:00): I’ve opened a discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/are-these-edits-to-highways-in-scotland-appropriate/117419 regarding these changes. Please consider providing input. Thanks!

Best regards
Frans S (2024-03-28 09:24:15+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149236006
miluethi (2024-04-04 22:33:40+00:00): sembra, you shapes are much to big for the buildings. Also they are not octagonized. I'm going to delete them all. Please work more carefully. Thanks.
Xvtn (2024-04-04 14:58:45+00:00): Howdy! In the future, please save your work in one area before moving on to the next. That makes it a lot easier for others to review your changes. More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Also, if this is a mechanical edit, did you follow the established guidelines? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct#Document_and_discuss_your_plans
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-29 22:52:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150683754, 150683768 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by user who did not reply to any changeset comments
Leo Slager (2024-03-30 17:46:03+00:00): In deze changeset heb je vergeten de wissels te taggen.
En je kleeft twee ways op elkaar.
dat leidt dan natuurlijk tot meerdere foutmeldingen. Ook de routerelatie van metrolijn 52 is daardoor beschadigd geraakt.

Ik repareer de fouten even.
marczoutendijk (2024-04-13 18:13:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15947
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-27 18:00:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11766645038

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-27 17:57:15+00:00): also, it was likely an undiscussed import
impiaaa (2024-03-28 16:52:08+00:00): Hi, please see the comment on your previous changeset at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144810285 . The SJSU relation is only for the main campus, not satellite campuses or off-campus facilities.
SammySpartan (2024-08-13 17:25:18+00:00): Hi, apologies for late response, I don't check this account that often.

I disagree that the South Campus shouldn't be included, plenty of other universities' "separate" campus have been included in the OpenStreetMap Relation (see: UC Berkeley's Kerr Campus, UT Austin's Pickle Campus, Syracuse University's South Campus, or the University of Buffalo's South Campus)

South Campus aside, why aren't SJSU's other sites included? Per SJSU's website, the Hammer Theater, Alquist Building, Campus Village 6, North Parking Garage, Child Development Center, Community Garden, and International House are all considered to be a part of the "main campus". I don't see why they should not be included. Again, many universities' OpenStreetMap Relations include facilities even if those facilities are a block or two away from a contiguous "main campus" (see: Harvard, Princeton, the University of Virginia, UCLA, or the University of Michigan)
impiaaa (2024-09-11 20:51:45+00:00): I can't speak for other universities, it could be that they are mapped wrong. I usually only pay attention to edits in my area. If you want to indicate that an off-campus office is run by SJSU, it's best to use the "operator" tag on that office. The "amenity=university" tag is only to indicate the area where classes are. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Duniversity OSM has a rule that one feature should only be represented by one OSM object, so the campus should be a single "amenity=university" way covering the area where classes take place. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element The land that SJSU owns is also not of interest to OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Parcel The way I see it, if someone were to ask me where SJSU is, I'd point to the block between San Fernando, 10th, San Salvador, and 4th. A search engine therefore should be able to find a single object with that name and that area.
Minh Nguyen (2024-09-11 23:00:01+00:00): An amenity=university area represents a single university campus. The area in question is Main Campus.

If we combine Main Campus and South Campus into a single geometry, we lose the ability to indicate that they have different addresses and different Wikidata IDs, or that Main Campus is a static historic landmark while South Campus is not. [1]

SJSU considers Hammer Theatre, the International House, the Child Development Center, the Mineta Transportation, and the hangar at Reid–Hillview to all be off-campus facilities. [2] However, their map of off-campus facilities does depict the North Parking Garage as part of Main Campus.

[1] https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/ListedResources/Detail/417
[2] https://www.sjsu.edu/map/off-campus.php
Minh Nguyen (2024-09-11 23:00:53+00:00): (I meant “state historic landmark”, not “static historic landmark”.)
225059 (2024-03-27 18:11:17+00:00): I left the way as „removed:highway“, because it is still visible in the latest aerial image and to prevent it to be remapped. 
It looks like the way has been removed recently.
I found a offical announcement of Gemeente Sluis from 2015 where the removal of this fietspad was announced. Reasons were the bad state of the surface and enough alternative routes for bicycles.
(https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/stcrt-2015-27872.pdf)
eggie (2024-03-27 19:52:55+00:00): Hi   225059.. I merged the landuse.
Greetz,
eggie
225059 (2024-03-29 14:52:01+00:00): Hi eggie,
good idea :) Thank you!
qugeb (2024-03-29 17:52:16+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Korrekturen. Bitte aber auch die dazugehörigen Fehlermeldungen selbst als 'erledigt' markieren, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149237828#map=18/49.56889/11.50073&layers=N
NEBschf (2024-03-29 21:06:25+00:00): Erledigt
DD1GJ (2024-04-04 19:17:28+00:00): Hallo Ch1ckenfried, es kann sein, dass die Beschriftung auf der Karte nicht ganz perfekt aussah, aber datenbanktechnisch war vor Deiner Änderung alles richtig. Das Haupt-Tag ist amenity=kindergarten und es kann am Gebäude oder am Gelände mit allen weiteren Informationen angebracht werden. Eine teilweise Verteilung auf Gebäude und Gelände erzeugt ein Chaos in der Datenbank. Daher habe ich diese Änderung wieder rückgängig gemacht.

Weitere Informationen zu OSM findest du z.B unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
bxl-forever (2024-03-27 22:51:25+00:00): Hello,

What source was used to add those ways inside the airport, please?

We recently had some trouble because a user imported copyrighted airport maps into OSM (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147724524), which goes against established guidelines, not to mention a large number of technical problems (unmatching levels, footways stretching out of the building directly onto the apron, and more).

It looks like your edit is extremely similar.

Looking forward to your reply.
Have a nice day.
pidugu konda reddy (2024-03-28 06:27:23+00:00): Hi,  
bxl-forever, we're very happy to be helping improve OSM and contribute to the community with this additional information. We wanted to clarify that we manually created all the footpaths on our own. We didn't copy the website. The website doesn't have any footpaths. We hope this resolves any confusion. Also We use our internal sources to create all these.
RaphaelPasloin (2024-03-28 08:41:59+00:00): Hello @pidugu konda reddy,

As your response is exactly a copy paste from the another changeset we refer, i guess you are also working for Uber. 

Are you aware of this : https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines I can't find the documentation on the OSM wiki about your organised edits. Can you provide us that and if not regulize the situation ? 

For the edit itself : 

Can you clarified witch website you reffer ?  You mentionned you don't copy it but you realy play on words ...
So how do you have determine the levels of footway, steps, elevator etc ? 
Also for this object (for exemple) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1266853802 how do you determine the orientation and globaly the position inside the terminal ? 

Thanks in advance for your responses,
Have a good day.
pidugu konda reddy (2024-04-01 05:29:45+00:00): Hi
Thanks for your feed back, We didn't copy from the website; we studied this information on our own and made the determination on our own that the levels were at these locations on the OSM map
Regards
Konda Reddy
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 05:48:48+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164841054
philippec (2024-03-28 23:29:17+00:00): In de buurt van de luifel.
BCNorwich (2024-03-28 08:01:35+00:00): Hello, 
As you've added a new roundabout at the crossroads should the crossroad junction now be removed? If so then the route relations should be adjusted as well. 

As you seem to be fairly local to the area can you do the amendments? Or shall I have a go?

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2024-03-31 08:03:08+00:00): No response so I've made amendments and checked the route relations, I think it's
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-29 22:52:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150683754, 150683768 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by user who did not reply to any changeset comments
skysamum (2024-03-27 19:01:21+00:00): Вы не аккуратно удалили мои изменения, я немного подправил разрешенные направления поворотов.
mcliquid (2024-03-28 07:56:43+00:00): Where is it signposted here that only pedestrians are allowed? I don't know of any such sign here, please let me know.

173529219
maraf24 (2024-03-31 23:42:13+00:00): Na pewno? Wydaje mi się, że po angielsku to jednak będzie "Złota Street".
Nazw własnych się nie tłumaczy, bo taka nazwa traci swoją funkcję identyfikacyjną.
Alanantos (2024-04-01 15:08:45+00:00): Tymczasem Galeria obok "Złote Tarasy" jest po angielsku cytowana jako "Golden Tarraces" - pomimo tego, że żadna oficjalna instytucja, ani nawet same Złote Tarasy jej nie używają. 
https://web.archive.org/web/20230426170658/https://studiovk.pl/en/warsaw-architecture/zlote-tarasy/

A więc jeśli nawet nazwy własne są tłumaczone to tym bardziej ulice które są takimi miękkimi nazwami własnymi, mającymi nazwę : " Ulica - Przymiotnik opisujący"
Jaki jest sens używania na siłę nazwy "Złota Street" jak galeria to nie "Złote Tarraces" tylko już "Golden Tarraces"

Ale zgodzę się że nie powinno być "Gold Street", a "Golden Street"
maraf24 (2024-04-01 16:28:06+00:00): A co nazwy ulic do prywatnych Złotych Tarasów?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-27 19:10:21+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231727534

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Arnaud Champollion (2024-03-28 08:14:18+00:00): Merci d'avoir ajouté ce nouveau sentier 👍️
Point de vigilance : je doute que "Nouvelle variante crête Feston" soit effectivement le nom (au sens du nom propre) de ce sentier.
Ne pas mélanger la descrption et le nom.
D'ici quelques années, sera-t-il toujours pertinent de parler de "nouvelle variante" ?
tekim (2024-03-28 14:23:35+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM)!  Thanks for submitting your edits to the map.  Unfortunately we are not allowed to use Google Maps when editing OSM.
tekim (2024-03-28 14:24:12+00:00): This is being reverted because it used a source that is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149271939
maraf24 (2024-03-31 23:49:17+00:00): Ulica Podskoków?
Alanantos (2024-04-01 15:17:12+00:00): Chmiel to po angielsku Hop
Yunkers (2024-04-01 17:36:44+00:00): Nazwą ulicy nie pochodzi od Chmielu. Sprawdź pochodzenie nazwy.
Alanantos (2024-04-01 18:25:28+00:00): azwa została oficjalnie nadana w 1770. Pochodzi od należących pierwotnie do książąt mazowieckich gruntów Chmielnik, przez które biegła zmierzając ku wsi Wielka Wola. Nazwa wskazuje, że kiedyś musiał istnieć tutaj „chmielnik”, czyli ogród chmielny

Czyli pochodzi od chmielu
Yunkers (2024-04-01 18:46:42+00:00): Nie. Pochodzi od chmielnika, inaczej ogrodu chmielnego. To nie jest to samo co "chmiel".  Na ulicy istnieje nawet bar "Chmielnik" który powinien Cię naprowadzić.
maraf24 (2024-04-01 19:06:29+00:00): Przykład ładnie pokazuje problem z tymi tłumaczeniami.
Zasadniczym problemem jest jednak to, że w name nie powinno być tłumaczeń nazw własnych.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-02 17:34:36+00:00): Zapraszam do https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dekolonizacja-ulic-w-warszawie/111266 na ogólną dyskusję.
JeroenHoek (2024-10-24 13:33:27+00:00): Weet je dat zeker van die eenrichtingsbeperking op de Jelle van Damweg in Jubbega? Die moet recent zijn, maar ik zie geen verkeersbesluit.
Paavobave (2024-03-27 19:47:03+00:00): Salmi*
aceman444 (2024-09-03 21:57:30+00:00): Zdravotne stredisko uz je zakreslene ako cela budova. Takze tento nazov je duplicitny.
aTarom (2024-03-28 07:57:50+00:00): Hola bienvenido! gracias por aportar conocimiento local, en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11767212369/history
cambio el "ele" (altitud desde el nivel del mar) a "height" (altura del elemento)

Saludos
aixbrick (2024-03-28 08:43:34+00:00): Hello,
I think it is better to use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgarden instead of "landuse=grass".
Regards
eokic (2024-03-28 09:26:01+00:00): Thanks for the input 👍🏻 I am also thinking that I should probably mark most of these as "private" to avoid confusion that they are public gardens?
aixbrick (2024-03-28 09:40:56+00:00): Sounds good, maybe together with "garden:type=residential".
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-12 16:19:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152334111/history - ten Dom Rzemiosł Teatralnych to rzeczywiście dostępne muzeum? Nijak nie mogę znaleźć informacji by otwarci byli

http://domrzemiosl.pl/ ostatnie info ma z 2017
uprkos (2026-07-05 22:17:56+00:00): Nie jest dostępne do zwiedzania. Byłem w środku w 2022r., gdy działało tam centrum pomocy uchodźcom z Ukrainy. Były tam jakieś stroje w gablotach itp., ale rzeczywiście skoro nie jest udostępnione regularnie, to nie powinno być oznaczone jako muzeum. Tylko nie wiem jak...
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-06 13:35:53+00:00): na razie na not:tourism=museum zmieniłem
aixbrick (2024-03-28 09:14:18+00:00): Please note that we map turn lanes as own ways only if they are structurally separated. That is not the case here. Instead the lanes tagging scheme is used, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes. Also you do not need to add "oneway=no" to roads because that is the default.
I therefore reverted the changeset with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149257804.
eokic (2024-03-28 09:26:19+00:00): Got it, thanks for the review 👍🏻
Dimitar155 (2024-08-19 05:33:31+00:00): Здравей, сигурен ли си че https://www.osm.org/node/11767222006 е ref=А? По принцип буквите на входовете вървят от ляво на дясно и би следвало входа към булеварда да е А.
Fraxi (2024-08-19 09:07:17+00:00): Здравей! Би трябвало да е така. Минавал съм оттам, след като е написано "survey". Въпреки това може тия дни да отида да видя, както да видя и другия вход. Самата сграда, в по-ранен набор от промени(с EveryDoor) съм обозначил с номера 74-76. И може всеки един от двата входа да се отнася поотделно за двата номера, т.е. и двата да са "А". Независимо от логиката. Но по-добре е да се види.
Fraxi (2024-08-20 19:11:07+00:00): Митко, прав си. Виж PM.
Marcel-NL (2024-04-18 07:50:08+00:00): Hoi. Ik had de straatnaam aangepast aan de hand van het straatnaambordje ter plekke. Daar staat op:
"Dongelse
Kanaaldijk"
Heb jij een bron waar het anders gespeld is?
A67-A67 (2024-04-18 18:40:36+00:00): Hoi,
Dit is de schrijfwijze in de BAG en BGT. Als het straatnaambordje een spatie bevat lijkt de beste tagging volgens de 'on the ground rule':
- name = Dongelse
Kanaaldijk
- official_name = Dongelsekanaaldijk
Met eventueel:
- source:name=straatnaambord
- source:official_name=BAG;BGT
Marcel-NL (2024-04-18 19:53:54+00:00): Aangepast zoals jij hebt voorgesteld.
danieldegroot2 (2024-03-27 20:40:18+00:00): Fyi this changeset was carried out fully manually and because most objects would be obvious typos only, was done in a single changeset.

Changes can be found here
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=149242484

Regards,

Daniel
danieldegroot2 (2024-03-28 12:15:35+00:00): Apparently it doesn't like it even with this few objects. Resort to checking objects below, it would still be quick.