piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
FajrAl (2026-05-02 05:20:04+00:00): please see changeset/182094882
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182073900
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-04 22:52:15+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182226223
FajrAl (2026-05-02 05:19:59+00:00): please see changeset/182094882
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182073910
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-04 06:19:48+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182188645
Tim Grose (2026-07-15 00:28:25+00:00): Hello Robert & other local mappers. I ran these four cul-de-sacs to the east side of Reigate Road last night. Warren Farm Close, Linnet Close, Juniper Place,  Hornbeam Close. Based on "private road" type signage and "feel" all I would say are ownership=private. For access it is more tricky but I would put motor_vehicle=private based on various forms of residents only parking signage on each of them (or at least most of them). destination access I am never keen on and according to OSM guidance there is no "except for access" signage as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:motor_vehicle%3Ddestination On foot there is no gate on any of them and no real feeling I should not be there other than the "pointless" (in general) of running up a dead enf. TBH access=yes with the motor_vehicle=private and ownership=private would be my "vote" for all of them on a pattern have used generally on my travels for citystrides
literan (2026-05-02 08:51:24+00:00): и зачем ресторан с аптекой в одну точку склеивать? верну обратно
Szymson (2026-05-03 08:02:13+00:00): Kolego, jak już próbujesz coś zmienić to nie zapominaj o relacjach bo ładny bałagan zostawiłeś.
I-76 (2026-05-01 13:43:42+00:00): Again Nearmap was NOT used
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-05-01 21:19:10+00:00): Merhaba. Adlar kısaltılmadan yazılmalı. Yani "Kılıç Sk." değil, "Kılıç Sokak" veya "Kılıç Sokağı" şeklinde yazılmalı.

Ayrıntılı açıklama için bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations

Değişiklik açıklamalarınızda kısaca değişikliğinizi özetleyiniz. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Eklediğiniz hayali askeri üsleri sildiğiniz için de ayrıca teşekkürler. Lütfen bir daha gerçek dışı şeyler eklemeyiniz.

İyi günler.
Antonino_Faro (2026-05-02 16:32:29+00:00): Hi, welcome to Sicily!!!
Could you please clarify the changeset comment 'Automatically generated summary'?
Thanks!!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182075300
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-01 18:49:25+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

An entre sidewalk with the name Flock?

Best regards
bmokol (2026-05-01 18:53:20+00:00): This is my first edit on here and that was a mistake. Are you able to change it for me? The camera is on w134th facing south near Harold ave
Kovoschiz (2026-05-02 08:53:37+00:00): Why are you still removing `embankment=` ?
vectorial8192 (2026-05-02 14:04:53+00:00): I don't "still" remove embankment info. This looks pretty flat to me, there is no embankment. Past info could be a mistake.

This is notably different from e.g. Yuen Long side where I very clearly acknowledge multi-level embankment.
kingkingHK (2026-05-02 14:31:11+00:00): I went there recently, and I can tell you that this is an embankment.

I will just restore `embankment=` with `source=survey`.
kingkingHK (2026-05-16 09:01:23+00:00): Restored https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182731706
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-01 14:31:31+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13784832738

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-23 23:31:30+00:00): Trimmed the name=* and moved the extra subtitle to the description=* for this SEO-account POI in changeset 183087316

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183087316
kingkingHK (2026-05-02 04:28:29+00:00): Hmm, aerial imagery is not very clear, but some `natural=wood` and `landuse=grass` looks like they should be `natural=tree_row` and `natural=shrubbery` instead.

I will not comment on the obvious issues of drawing separate ways without physical separation and curved turning paths.
LordGarySugar (2026-05-26 22:24:20+00:00): Thank you for making this change, it's correct that there should only be one university here, as College Lane and de Havilland campuses are not individual universities.
MapMenMan (2026-05-04 02:04:45+00:00): The address of the derelict site on Sullivan's Quay is "Former Government Buildings, Sullivan's Quay, Cork" without the "site" added. The official address is available on the public record of the previous planning permission granted. "Site" would be a generic descriptor that is already covered by the brownfield tag
kingkingHK (2026-05-02 04:12:40+00:00): Imo just use `amenity=parking` + `access=private` for car storage.
vectorial8192 (2026-05-02 14:01:22+00:00): From aerial imagery, this looks less like a private car park, and more like an area to store new, to-be-sold vehicles, or something similar. It cannot possibly be a parking area.
kingkingHK (2026-05-03 08:08:07+00:00): Imo that's still a car park. See e.g. various franchised bus long-term parking areas (not depots).
Kovoschiz (2026-05-03 08:45:51+00:00): @kingkingHK Those could be `=depot` depending on definition. I invented having only`depot:service=storage` to distinguish. 
`industrial=storage` has been used for open-air. `storage=` exists.
It can further have `=parking`  inside `=industrial` as micro detail, if it doesn't cover the entire polygon, or double-tagged for same area. Possible to find another attribute for the "carpark" use.
vectorial8192 (2026-05-04 14:45:30+00:00): These polygons were tagged as "warehouse buildings". This was obviously wrong because there are no buildings, but I can see the mapping intent is "these lands are for storing stuff".

Then, at minimum these are industrial landuse. Further refinement should probably stay on the basis of industrial landuse.
detective-fiasco (2026-05-01 14:58:32+00:00): Fix small inconsistencies in tagging, as specified by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:railway=signal#Popis_n%C3%A1v%C4%9Bstidla
tomhukins (2026-05-21 07:58:40+00:00): As ever, thank you for your helpful work improving the map.  This changeset added "food:dogs=£2.75" which seems like an unusual tag, but I know this pub is dog friendly so it doesn't seem unreasonable.

In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182459059 @mueschel decided to delete this tag without discussion because "things like this happen accidentially just too often to write messages to everybody" so I thought I would check with you.
SomeoneElse (2026-05-21 09:24:45+00:00): Thanks for mentioning it!  It's not the first time he's done that.  I've previously had to explain that Bat Billiards was a different thing to billiards: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151567498 :)
SomeoneElse (2026-05-21 09:25:20+00:00): "bar billiards" even.  "bat billiards" would be very different...
tomhukins (2026-05-21 09:46:50+00:00): It briefly crossed my mind that perhaps there was another version of billiards I had never heard of, and I casually wondered how it might work, but it wasn't to be :)
SomeoneElse (2026-05-21 11:14:11+00:00): For completeness: https://www.mastersofgames.com/rules/bar-billiards-rules.htm :) 
It does see to be going through a bit of a revival.  I was in the pub when the one at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116037001 was installed.
SomeoneElse (2026-05-21 11:14:55+00:00): (no bats involved!)
VictorIE (2026-06-08 07:31:04+00:00): So, one player throws the billiard ball, their opponent hits it with a cricket bat and everyone in the pub ducks? :)
user_10901495 (2026-05-01 15:32:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181964283
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181994029
gdt (2026-05-01 15:37:58+00:00): Sorry for the empty comment.  This changeset adds Minnow Brook, flowing from Minnow Pond to Blue Mountain Lake, based on hydrography from the National Map, with naming and confirmation of national map data based on discussion with a local who has traversed it.
baotao (2026-05-05 15:18:56+00:00): 青岛市区建议使用Esri底图绘制，Bing有点旧了。
kingkingHK (2026-05-02 04:21:20+00:00): Not super familiar with this stuff (maybe @Kovoschiz will have something to say), but iirc look-left look-right markings don't count as `crossing:markings=`.
Kovoschiz (2026-05-02 08:25:33+00:00): They don't. I asked with a UK or Singapore photo. Author is lucky enough to use an HK one. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:markings#Look_left/look_right_markings
vectorial8192 (2026-05-02 14:02:46+00:00): I will take no action. Until we have a spec for this, I will take it as "marked crossing".
kingkingHK (2026-05-03 07:23:02+00:00): I don't understand. It's already documented that they aren't `crossing:markings=`. Is that not a spec? What else do you want? But, ok, I guess we can discuss on Discord first; I see a thread has been created.
Kovoschiz (2026-05-03 08:39:52+00:00): The spec is `crossing:markings=no`
vectorial8192 (2026-05-04 14:36:46+00:00): I view here changeset comment is the place to discuss the "small things", while Discord is the place to discuss the "big things", and when we have consensus, we post them to the wiki for long-term storage.
SpinOff (2026-05-01 21:04:45+00:00): Hej. Zacna idea z dodawaniem granic, ale w OSM jest to dużo trudniejsze niż się wydaje. W tym zestawie zmian przypadkiem została usunięta cała gmina Chmielno, a na styku gmin były zdublowane linie granic. Jakby co przywróciłem usunięte obiekty i dodąłem Łapalice jako relację: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20612308

Do dodawania granic potrzebujesz:
 - edytora JOSM
- danych z geometrą granic, np. z BDOT10k
- zrozumienia czym są relacje w OSM i jak je edytować

Na YouTube, na kanale "OpenStreetMap Polska" jest film instruktażowy pokazujący jak edytować granice w  OSM
Poezja (2026-05-10 20:35:40+00:00): Dzięki za podpowiedzi, następnym razem spróbuję nie usuwać całych gmin przypadkiem😇
Glassman (2026-05-01 23:56:19+00:00): These appear to be service roads according to county documents. I'll send you a more info on OSM in a message. Check out the wiki page for highway classification.

Can you review this edit to make sure these are actually residential or service roads?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182082495
bartgron (2026-05-01 18:48:58+00:00): Proszę o źródło powstania tej drogi, w przeciwnym wypadku zmiana zostanie wycofana.
bartgron (2026-05-03 18:29:51+00:00): Zgodnie z ostrzeżeniem, zestaw zmian został wycofany.
Pozdrawiam
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-04 00:35:04+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20230
Lucy miau (2026-05-01 16:25:09+00:00): und note/5233952
Tomas Straupis (2026-05-01 18:04:55+00:00): Hello, please do not reclassify the roads without consulting the local community. Classification is result of long discussions and work.
Glassman (2026-05-01 23:48:12+00:00): To move the admin boundary, it will need to be unglued from the street. In the iD editor (browser) select the admin boundary the hit Shift D to unglue the two linestrings. Note this can be challenging. It's we we don't recommend joining two different features.  Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182083665
Cavokld (2026-05-02 00:30:10+00:00): Bonjour, pour les noms, il faut toujours mettre des majuscules au début de chaque mot. La croquinoix cela devrait être La Croquinoix. Mais en fait ici l'appellation correcte c'est Le Croquinoix. (pas La mais Le).
Pour le restaurant Azul, l'adressage est en doublon, tu as déjà positioné un noeud avec une adresse. Donc inutile sur le restaurant.
Pour la boîte aux lettres, ne jamais mettre une adresse dessus, ni de addr:street. 
l'adresse addr:housenumber=4
addr:street=Rue Raymond Lagoutte peut très bien être mise sur un nœud séparé devant le Super U. C'est pas la boîte aux lettres qui est au 4 mais le Super U.
Bonnes corrections.
Cordialement.
nevw (2026-05-27 22:20:15+00:00): Hi, multipolygons cannot share sides of outer rings.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.30437&lat=-38.02218&zoom=19
Dave247 (2026-05-28 09:46:26+00:00): Thanks for picking that up. I didn't even notice that the areas had turned into a multiplogyon, it was probably because I merged the separate areas.

I've deleted and redrawn it as a single area which hopefully resolves the issue. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183295108#map=19/-38.022175/145.304732

The whole purpose is just so I can include a path to the but also indicate that it is below a roof overhang/cover from the building.
nevw (2026-05-28 11:18:17+00:00): If it is a roof overhang, the building boundary should be on the outer boundary of the building:part, as building:part is always within the building footprint. Or, shift the building:part under the edge of the building and join the nodes.
As there are two main buildings there would need to be a building:part for each, joining where the buildings meet.
From what you have said this is what it is, so you just need to make the two main buildings a bit bigger to include the roof building:part/s and make two building:part s
It's not clear to me from imagery.

Otherwise, if it was just a separate roof added to the edge of the building then it would be tagged building=roof instead and would not be within the main building footprint.

If this is unclear, I can do it.
Dave247 (2026-05-28 13:08:06+00:00): I think I get it. My misunderstanding steamed from being concerned about the outside walkway not looking like it was inside/part of the building. In that scenario, it should be classified as building=roof like you said.

I've corrected it, hopefully right this time. I'll have to go back and correct a number of my past edits too.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183305202
Cavokld (2026-05-01 23:59:16+00:00): Bonjour pour la salle des fêtes le numéro c'est bien le 1, mais pour la rue c'est Rue Raymond Lagoutte. Le 1 Rue Camille Toussaints existe bien, mais il est tout au Nord, au début de la Rue Camille Toussaints. En plus on le comprend aisément car juste avant, tu as numéroté le 33 Rue Camille Toussaints. Donc le 1 Rue Camille Toussaints ne peut pas être après le 33. Après le 33 si c'est le 1 forcément c'est une autre rue.Cordialement.
TrickyFoxy (2026-06-19 11:55:37+00:00): 👋  Можно обозначить и три банкомата. С точки зрения человека использующего карту, и одного будет достаточно будет. Вряд ли кому-то нужен конкретный банкомат.
TrickyFoxy (2026-06-19 11:56:32+00:00): Снесённый здания можно либо удалять, либо заменить тег building на was:building. Заменил.
Yunan973 (2026-05-03 15:13:17+00:00): Bonjour,

il faudrait que tu apprennes comment fonctionnent les multipolygones https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Relation:multipolygon

Puis que tu corriges tes erreurs https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=2.45155&lat=43.17837&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
MapmakerrrJohn (2026-05-02 13:08:58+00:00): Oh
VLD0251 (2026-05-04 17:55:17+00:00): Despite a previous warning, you are still removing name:* tags (including name:fr), combining different languages in the name field, and making edits without adding comments or sources 
Please correct this as soon as possible. Otherwise, your account may be blocked.
ilias_ (2026-05-25 18:13:11+00:00): What's even funnier is that some names are inherently in French and they know it's the case, but they don't have a choice but to keep it in the name tag, and just replace name:fr by name:en, like no one will notice. Examples: "Cité 350 logements"... I don't think that's English.
Cavokld (2026-05-01 23:43:42+00:00): Bonjour l'adresse pour Michelet Confiturier n'est pas correcte. Il est inscrit addr:housenumber=12
addr:street=Rue Clément Choret alors que tu as déjà positionné cette adresse au bon emplacement. Ici c'est 40 Rue Jules Ferry. Cordialement.
NieWnen (2026-06-09 13:34:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182936233#c1605664
NieWnen (2026-06-09 13:35:55+00:00): *Edit, niepotrzebny link :) Źle spojrzałem kto dodał notatkę.
literan (2026-05-02 08:44:43+00:00): в тег operator пишем название юрлица
iandees (2026-05-01 19:02:42+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10569466851 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182089513, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
VLD319 (2026-05-01 20:54:53+00:00): Hi iandees,

I apologize for any inconvenience. Thank you for catching and resolving the dragged node!  I appreciate your help and will do my best to avoid this issue in the future. 

Happy mapping! 
-VLD319
Cayenne17 (2026-05-04 21:13:43+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour les contributions.

Je viens de corriger et rajouter `access=private` vu que c'est une piscine privée: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182224025
gmar5 (2026-05-12 14:57:07+00:00): Con un po' di ritardo, torno sulla questione di questi "comuni sparsi".

Al momento abbiamo:
- una boundary relation con place=village https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/47093#map=11/46.3969/9.4420
- un membro della relazione, per la stessa entità, assegnato come label, con place=municipality https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2251998249

Non mi sembra che abbia molto senso. Piuttosto dovrebbe essere il contrario.
L'area con i confini del comune potrebbe essere place=municipality. 
Invece, lo scopo di label è di rendere il nome sulla mappa, ma place=municipality non è renderizzato, quindi place=village sarebbe meglio in quel caso. 
Non credo si tratti di "mapping for the renderer", visto che un paese composto da più frazioni è pur sempre un paese reale, con un nome comunemente usato da tutti, con una propria popolazione. Non è un artificio amministrativo. 
(In certi casi le frazioni potrebbero essere anche rese gerarchicamente come suburb/quarter/neighbourhood, se non abbastanza indipendenti). 

Non deve valere per tutti necessariamente. In altri casi dove il comune amministrativo è completamente artificiale, magari come fusione di più paesi, allora place=municipality senza label con place=village/town/etc. è probabilmente meglio.

Grazie. Ciao.
Nakaner (2026-07-06 10:15:57+00:00): Hi,

did you mean amenity=bicycle_repair_station?

Best regards

Michael
trollimelli (2026-07-06 13:19:33+00:00): Hello Michael,
yes. Seems to be good.

Best regards
Oliver
mavl (2026-06-07 06:02:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183764451, 183764460, 183764431, 183764453, 183764448, 183764459, 183764455 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20768].
Atkin (2026-05-01 19:29:02+00:00): Self-reviewed, no longer requires review
YomanNH (2026-05-04 10:29:55+00:00): Linia czynna tylko na krótkim fragmencie miedzy mostami? I za nieczynnym mostem jest kolejny krótki czynny kawałek? Ta edycja wygląda mocno podejrzanie.
eggie (2026-05-01 19:33:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
aceman444 (2026-05-01 23:21:08+00:00): Zdravim, aky je teda tu zdroj na tie hranice?
A na admin_level=9 sme sa zatial nedohodli to davat (ked katastralne uzemia na 10 su vacsie). Ja ich prave menim na 11 a potom to jednotne zmenime.
t_ja (2026-05-02 19:29:07+00:00): Ahoj,
v tejto sade zmien som zobral existujuce katastralne uzemia a skopiroval som ich do novych relacii reprezentujuce mestske casti, otagovane podla navrhu od Frantu.
Zmensil som len tieto uzemia:
1) Bytcica - nakolko mestska cast Solinky uz prerastla do KU Bytcica
2) Zavodie - v tomto KU sa nachadza cela mestska cast Hajik.
Hranice tychto dvoch mestskych casti su zakreslene "od oka" podla zastavaneho uzemia, kedze presny zdroj neexistuje (aspon o nom neviem).

Zvysnych 6 mestskych casti doplnim/spresnim zajtra, vychadzat budem podla oficialneho zoznamu ulic: https://zilina.sk/mesto-zilina/sprava-mesta/mestske-casti/

Co sa tyka "spravnej" hodnoty admin_level: pomaly prichadzam na to, preco Franta odporuca neznacit mestske casti ako "administrative" ale iba ako "place": napriklad mestska cast Solinky je z vacsej casti umiestnena v KU Zilina, ale na juhu uz prerastla do KU Bytcica. A nie som presvedceny, ze je dobry napad rozdelit mestsku cast Solinky na dve plochy (ktore spolu susedia) len preto, aby sa zmestili do relacii admin_level=10 (ktore reprezentuju KU).

Po zakresleni zvysnych mestskych casti sa to moze kedykolvek pretagovat, ak sa dohodne nejaka lepsia schepa tagovania.
aceman444 (2026-05-02 22:39:02+00:00): Ano, to sa snazime zistit, ci mestske casti su pekne uzavrete v katastralne  uzemiach, alebo zasahuju aj do inych. Zatial v kazdom meste bola nejaka anomalia (aj v BA aj BB).

Prosim uvadzajte ten zdroj, kedze to nie je kataster, ale podla zoznamu ulic, dajte tu linku do zdroja sady zmien. Dakujem.
Senihtu (2026-05-02 06:18:19+00:00): Hallo und guten Morgen!
Du hast hier 2 Pfosten mitten auf die Straße gestellt.
Soll das so sein? Oder sind diese Pfosten "auf die Straße gerutscht" und sollten eigentlich irgendwo am Fahrbahnrand stehen?
So wie es jetzt ist, kann der Linienbus seine unmittelbar dort liegende Haltestelle nicht mehr nutzen. Oder klappt der Busfahrer die Poller jedesmal um? Dann sollte da ein psv=yes dran.
happy mapping!
GenGap (2026-05-02 19:21:03+00:00): Hey, sollen natürlich an den Rand des Gehweges zum Hof hin. Danke für den Hinweis, ich ändere es
FajrAl (2026-05-02 05:19:50+00:00): please see changeset/182094882
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182091158
FajrAl (2026-05-04 09:35:13+00:00): reverted in changeset/182195349
b-jazz (2026-05-02 15:07:40+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107283827

Please don't overlap fairways and greens like you did on the hole mentioned above. I've cleaned it up and added the fringe around the green, but thought you'd want to know for future mapping. Thanks.
Chuck Sites (2026-05-05 02:54:23+00:00): Hi b-jazz.  Thanks for the info.   Just did  a lot of updates to the East and South courses.  It looks like someone built a course splitting the west and east courses with hole markers 6,7,8 and 9. The whole west course needs to be re-done.    I've done a lot of public golf courses in Louisville for OSM and happy to contribute again.  The current West course needs a complete redo.  Anyway thanks for the corrections.  I hope the new work is better.

CB.
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-02 07:49:38+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

This and your other changesets removes multiple name:* -tags.

Furthermore, your used changeset comment looks somehow strange.

Best regards.
mildlyconcernedtomato (2026-05-05 20:07:47+00:00): In response to this map note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5124404 
This will need additional updates in the future.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 07:13:15+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184212056

https://osm.org/changeset/184212056