piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kre777 (2026-07-04 06:48:08+00:00): Hallo Piene
Ein weiteres verschlimbessertes Mapping (siehe auch changeset/175828358). Seebruck St_2095 Richtung Arlaching. Ab dem Straßenstück https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/197672884. Von hier ab gibt es keinen Fahrradweg & auch kein sidewalk_both:separate. Das sind seperate Wege (way/237129145 way/334019953) die nicht mehr auf die St_2095 führen und direkt damit nichts zu tun haben. Nicht Straßenbegleitend! Bitte vorerst Keine cycleways/sidewalks eintragen/ändern. Erst Anleitungen lesen, überdenken & beachten. z.B.: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:cycleway 
Grüße kre777
tastrax (2026-05-22 04:32:42+00:00): Quick tip - we add the full phone number including the country code (as per the wiki guidelines - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers)
jufy111 (2026-05-22 04:38:08+00:00): No Problem, I'll amend my updates and ensure this is done going forwards.
mavl (2026-05-23 07:01:54+00:00): Здравствуйте. "Полетели72 - Полёты на Воздушном шаре в Тюмени" - это не название с точки зрения OpenStreetMap.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия  
  
И это место не магазин подарков.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:shop%3Dgift
WoSoe (2026-05-22 05:24:53+00:00): Das war doch bisher immer eine Ortsverbindungsstraße. highway=unclassified
Wurde das jetzt geändert?
Am Ortsausgang von Moosbach stand »immer« ein Ortsausgangsschild. Wurde das jetzt entfernt?

https://www.google.de/maps/@49.3923968,11.2672992,3a,75y,111.78h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sQR7zabkbzYunRtXAMwPOLQ!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D0%26panoid%3DQR7zabkbzYunRtXAMwPOLQ%26yaw%3D111.78179719475368!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDUxNy4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=track?uselang=de#Abgrenzung_zu_highway=unclassified
R2Tom (2026-05-22 05:46:34+00:00): Du hast recht - bin von der anderen seite gekommen und habe das Schild dann nicht gesehen.
BubbaJuice (2026-06-08 03:11:35+00:00): Is the SunZia line now operational? What is the source of your reference on the line?

Thanks,
BubbaJuice
Kovirii (2026-06-09 05:21:21+00:00): Yes
https://www.wecc.org/sites/default/files/documents/progress_report/2026/SunZia%202026%20APR.pdf
BubbaJuice (2026-06-20 04:42:03+00:00): I don't see any instance of the reference you tagged: "SZ"
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-07 11:10:30+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam tags for POI Dental Implant Professionals in changeset 183775004

https://osm.org/changeset/183775004
Supaplex (2026-05-22 09:28:06+00:00): 請填寫資料來源，如讓JOSM記錄用的影像圖層或是其他疊圖
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183003496
eggie (2026-05-22 08:05:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback format phone aangepast naar +31..  Samengevoegd nu als één adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
aldarosm (2026-05-23 10:42:27+00:00): Ik heb deze wijziging teruggedraaid. Het adrespunt op deze locatie is Markt 4. 

De apotheek was al toegevoegd aan het adres Kloosterstraat 11. Ik heb de apotheek verwijderd van Markt 4.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-07 11:25:23+00:00): Reverted addition of SEO spam POI to an existing building with a nonsense building=* tag, SEO-spammy name=* and missing any top-level tags or a meaningful address

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183775737
bxl-forever (2026-05-22 09:09:18+00:00): ## REVERTED CHANGESET

You created an invalid structure here, breaking what we had carefully designed only a few months ago.  Here is the public description of the most recent change for that building before you started editing: "merged 3 buildings into one single unit with building parts + fixed shape of the middle part + detached road from the building part above"  This is because this building is a complicated structure with an elevated part in the middle.  It was mapped correctly, and that was explained very explicitely in the last commit, so there was no need for new users to come here and remap everything.

Also, please start writing meaningful changeset descriptions when you upload data to the public database.  Writing "dat is beter" or smileys conveys no useful information for other mappers, as if you were trying to hide what you are doing, and some of your changes look very mysterious.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

This edit has been undone.
NK10101 (2026-05-25 05:34:39+00:00): ???
NK10101 (2026-05-25 05:34:45+00:00): Why
NK10101 (2026-05-25 05:34:51+00:00): ???
NK10101 (2026-05-25 05:35:02+00:00): WHY?
NK10101 (2026-05-25 05:35:17+00:00): STOP!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-07 10:54:45+00:00): Split POI tags to node, add missing top level tag and clean up SEO spam tags for Deft Decor POI in changeset 183774369

https://osm.org/changeset/183774369
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-22 06:01:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/305165925

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Konrad95 (2026-06-01 20:03:09+00:00): Wycofałem zdublowane przystanki w: changeset/183516990 Więcej na ten temat w 1. komentarzu pod: changeset/183250298
josmougn (2026-05-24 15:37:46+00:00): Bonjour, pourquoi dupliquer les noms "name" en name:fr ?
confusedbuffalo (2026-05-24 18:42:50+00:00): Salut, j'ai dupliqué name en name:fr parce que c'est ce qui est conseillé sur le wiki pour les noms multilingues. J'ai jugé que ceux-ci n'étaient pas ambigus, donc qu'ils pouvaient facilement être faits tous en même temps.
josmougn (2026-05-24 22:59:48+00:00): merci pour l'info, je ne connaissais pas cette recommandation.
Cela complique un peu les choses pour corriger un nom (2 lignes à corriger au lieu d'une seule).

En regardant vite fait quelques exemples je tombe sur des bizarreries, par exemple https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193584498
name:fr=Traoñ Spiñs
Le "ñ" n'existe pas vraiment en français, en général il est remplacé par "n" lors de la transcription des noms en français.
Cela dit, c'est un cas particulier.
trial (2026-05-25 21:44:09+00:00): ça fait surtour un fratras à maintenir alors que default_language=fr sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2202162 dit que name=name:fr. Bref un revert m'irait bien, avec une précision dans le wiki.
confusedbuffalo (2026-05-26 17:59:39+00:00): En fait, il y aurait trois lignes à modifier, car si le name change, alors le name:br change sûrement aussi. Cela permet de mettre cela en évidence.
Le problème avec default_language, c'est qu'il ne semble pas du tout être utilisé par les consommateurs de données.
trial (2026-05-26 19:08:55+00:00): Oui default_language est trop peu utilisé. Demander à quelques applis d'utiliser correctement les données me semble préférable à bordéliser OSM.
Tu n'as d'ailleurs pas complètement bordélisé : les relations n'ont pas été pourries, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2115196#map=17/48.394536/-4.453851&layers=N, il faudrait aussi bordéliser les old_name, alt_name, ceux avec un suffixe temporel, etc.
Et voyons fous, les point d'adresse aussi https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4434353549.
trial (2026-05-26 19:10:56+00:00): Tu auras compris, je suis pour des bases de données propres, sans réplications inutiles. Si certaines applis ne savent pas faire avec, il leur suffit de préprocesser les données afin d'obtenir les données qui leur vont.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2026-06-13 20:45:13+00:00): This changeset created a number of duplicate features.
CCCGGG (2026-06-17 13:11:46+00:00): I see...
No idea why.
There is a way to delete the duplicates in a bulk?
chris66 (2026-05-25 16:20:22+00:00): Hi,
Tempo 50 wegen Vogelschutz.
chris66 (2026-05-25 16:59:02+00:00): Was ist hiermit?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1180918223
Raymond (2026-05-25 17:07:31+00:00): fixed.
Raymond (2026-05-25 17:07:40+00:00): Auf der gesamten Strecke?
chris66 (2026-05-25 17:11:00+00:00): Bis wo die 50 Richtung N gehen weiss ich nicht. LG.
Raymond (2026-05-25 17:15:45+00:00): Ich habe eine Note gesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5309709
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-22 06:49:27+00:00): Previous CS also redacted
one_electro_dan (2026-05-22 12:55:29+00:00): Salut, ai grijă când editezi o relație. Ai schimbat tag-ul pentru relation/1299285 din landuse=farmland în landuse=construction. Asta înseamnă că o suprafață foarte mare de teren a devenit șantier.

Dacă vrei să adaugi un șantier, trebuie să pui tag-ul pe un poligon nou, nu pe întreaga relație.

Am schimbat eu înapoi în Changeset/183021650.
miahi (2026-05-22 14:59:03+00:00): Sorry, nu am văzut că e așa mare poligonul.
Dodko (2026-05-26 07:44:58+00:00): Adresa môže byť len na jednom vchode.
sz17900 (2026-05-22 10:14:20+00:00): 👋Thanks for your edits in Changchun! I noticed a few small issues: please use Chinese in `name=*` and put English names
  in `name:en=*`. Also, please avoid connecting unrelated features by shared nodes, such as landuse areas with roads or
  power lines with roads. Happy mapping!
mavl (2026-05-23 06:54:33+00:00): Здравствуйте. В названиях улиц указывают слово "улица", например "улица Александра Гилёва".  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог
dinarsharg (2026-05-25 02:39:57+00:00): Спасибо! Исправил!
nevw (2026-05-27 22:41:57+00:00): Hi, multipolygons cannot share outer sides
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.96137&lat=-37.81537&zoom=19
RSota (2026-05-28 10:52:00+00:00): Thanks for the information. I've removed the touching multipolygons to leave only one.
nevw (2026-05-28 11:24:44+00:00): That's what I would do too.
If each part differed from each other and you wanted to add separate heights or levels, etc then you could draw a separate building:part within the main building polygon for each one and add differing tags.
Bienson (2026-05-23 03:40:59+00:00): Rottler Brillen ist shop=optician, nicht healthcare=optometrist.
Ich schätze mal, die Übersetzung in StreetComplete ist da nicht gut und zeigt beides als "Optiker" an.

Korrigiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183048639
LoamSaviour (2026-05-23 21:53:50+00:00): Not even the right name, I thought you took pride in your work smh...
eerib (2026-05-25 19:18:32+00:00): Hello LoamSaviour,

I did not add the trail name for this trail. The name for this trail was added by user "cole12345" in changeset #182392901 on May 8, 2026.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182392901

If you are aware of a different name then please do let me know.

Thank you, eerib
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-22 08:11:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13859593860
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1134116229

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-22 08:41:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13859593860
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1134116229

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NKDTL (2026-05-22 08:54:05+00:00): Poprawione, dzięki
旧加卷 (2026-05-23 00:39:54+00:00): Some questionable issues regarding your edits:
1. You've acknowledged that repeatedly moving the same node across dozens of changesets due to the zooming limits of iD was "disruptive editing", and stated that you would stop to do so (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182710040#c1595671). The block on this account (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20523) was subsequently lifted. However, it appears that you've continued to make similar edits: you moved node/13855959408 20 times, node/13851785391 34 times, node/13850632009 11 times, and node/13836987920 55 times.
2. Your edits regarding the so-called "Philippine Exclusive Economic Zone" are completely based on your own assumptions. Your edits appear to join the lines with the outer limit of the territorial waters of the Philippine occupied islets. This is completely incorrect and does not reflect the claim of any side.
3. Malaysia and the Philippines claim waters extending 200 nm from their baselines as their exclusive economic zone. China has never announced the delimitation of the territorial waters, exclusive economic zone, and continental shelves around the Nansha (Spratly) Islands, but China describes the waters close to the Philippines as the "overlapping waters of China-Philippines exclusive economic zones". This means that any claims regarding the exclusive economic zone in this area are unilateral, which does not constitute a mutually recognized final delimitation.
4. The outer boundaries of the exclusive economic zone should not be tagged with admin_level=2 + border_type=territorial + boundary=administrative. A state's sovereignty extends over its territory, internal waters, and territorial sea. Sovereign rights in the exclusive economic zone do not constitute full sovereignty.
5. Territorial waters are not included in the exclusive economic zone, but it appears that you included the territorial water delimitations as the outer boundaries of the exclusive economic zones.
6. You are not supposed to add the admin_centre member into boundary=maritime .
7. You should not assign the inner members with the outer roles in a type=boundary relation.
Taya_S (2026-05-23 11:01:49+00:00): Thanks for the detailed write-up 旧加卷. A shame they resumed editing again without acknowledging any of the comments they received. 

User blocked again in osm.org/user_blocks/20702
Recent edits reverted in: changeset/183062129

Additionally also see the discussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183023095
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-22 08:41:54+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Staszica":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/282046866
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/284916544
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287046809

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SekeRob repair (2026-05-31 09:22:49+00:00): Hi,

When you and any CAI hiker map routes and there are already highways, use those to develop your hiking route relation. Also tags of the hiking route relation do not below on the highways... only that surface=* and other particulars that you see under your feet. As for width=5000, this means in OSM 5000 meters wide. Maybe you meant 50 centimeters. OSM uses the dot as decimal, not comma. When you import a route look of what already has a way and what's new. Then assess if what is new is actually a path or really a farm track that had not been mapped before. At any rate, I've done all the cutting and transferring to existing track/road where your path overlapped and made them member of your hike route relation. Have a look if the route is OK. THe JOSM Editor indicated there were no gaps between from and to.

Happy mapping (and hiking)
SekeRob

PS: The repair edit is here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183432914
yelisey90 (2026-05-22 11:43:27+00:00): reverted — there is definitely no separate station there. But see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10074662217 (maybe need relocating) and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509648544

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183018788
simonschaufi (2026-05-24 06:02:29+00:00): This is exactly the place where the minibuses stop. Since minibusses are not official buses with a number and so on, there is also not an official bus stop but this is the place where they stop.
McKulkin (2026-05-24 11:23:28+00:00): Someone's running a shady minibus op in my Georgia? No way! 
All passenger transportation services are subject to licensing. Every transportation provider is required to obtain a permit for the specific route or type of service they're operating. Mini-buses (marshrutka's) in Tbilisi are assigned a number greater than 400. The ones without a number are likely inter-city, but they obviously have a visible route label under the windshield and a timetable/more info in the cabin.
yelisey90 (2026-05-25 07:41:53+00:00): @simonschaufi , can you clarify, which minibuses precisely? There are city minibuses which are official and with numbers; but likely they stop a bit to the south at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9788941265 (they should do according to ttc.com.ge , but they don't always obey it). And yes, there are intercity minibuses, which usually only have destination written above. There's a node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10074662217 for Telavi minibuses, which, I guess, is not 100% precise; likely it should be moved and a description listing all directions should be added.

But in any case, it's not a bus station, as there is no infrastructure. Just a stop.
simonschaufi (2026-05-25 09:52:04+00:00): I'm back again at the Isani metro station. I double checked every information that is mapped. The mapped bus terminal doesn't exist. The place is actually a parking lot for the stores nearby with a gate in front. No buses enter there.
The marshrutkas stop at the same bus stop to north but I got dropped of coming from north on the other side of the street of the bus terminal.

@yelisey90 I actually mean the marshrutkas which don't have a number and are long distance buses with just the destination in the window.

I would say it is more than a bus stop as this is the "terminal" where the buses start from and not only a stop on their route.
evgenykatyshev (2026-05-25 11:45:48+00:00): It sounds like a typical terminal bus stop, which is always more than just a stop. But still stop, not a bus station.
McKulkin (2026-05-25 22:55:40+00:00): *sighs*
You came as a tourist, visited the place once and started editing? Why not put up a note instead?

Take a look: https://maps.app.goo.gl/Wh4Cv5Qtz5MsctPq9 - this would be the point where your intercity minibus would try to find a place to fit in to make a long stop to pick up passengers likely carrying some baggage (a lot of it). It can't stop at a city bus stop because it would create chaos. Thus it stops further up the street along the "taxi" area.

The view that you're seeing ^there - you're looking at the city bus stop where the city mini[+buses] stop. There's a sign and a pavilion, and an electronic timetable.

The mapped bus terminal that you're referring to is @ https://maps.app.goo.gl/sdLNBUC9kJPD2W396 , isn't it? Have you actually tried entering that area past the gate and snapping some photos?

--
What needs to be done:
node/10074662217 moved north in place of node/9788941265 , renamed to "intercity minibus stop" , tags `shelter`, `bench` dropped, node/9788941265 moved south by 10m(?) aligning it to NAPR/GPS data.
yelisey90 (2026-05-26 06:40:59+00:00): node/9788941265 is actually in the correct spot, there's a shelter visible is you turn on imagery from NAPR: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NAPR

Otherwise, yes, it seems indeed that node/10074662217 should be moved to the north of it and edited accordingly
yelisey90 (2026-05-26 06:41:22+00:00): *if you turn on
simonschaufi (2026-05-26 09:49:51+00:00): @McKulkin I wasn't sure if people would even read the notes. It looks like people are getting notifications when changes happen (I don't know how to get notifications myself).

I had a look into the "bus terminal" and couldn't find any bus in there and no bus entering and leaving. As I said, it looks more like a parking place where buses might park but I'm quite sure it is no place where people can actually enter a bus. I didn't take any pictures but I took pictures of the bus stop around the bus stop near the junction where i have a proof that green buses, blue buses and marshrutkas stop.

> https://maps.app.goo.gl/sdLNBUC9kJPD2W396 yes, this i what i mean. on google maps there you can see a bus parking but when i was there i didn't see any bus, only a few cars. are you living here and can confirm this is really a bus terminal?

> What needs to be done

yes, i agree but there are not only marshrutkas to Telavi but also to Lagodekhi (which I took).

When you look into the bus terminal in Lagodekhi you will see that there is already a bus route mapped to Isani but without any final stop. That was my intention to add that. Is there someone among you who knows how to map bus routes as this can't be done with iD editor.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-20 05:31:05+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184339826
Trebmuh (2026-05-22 08:41:55+00:00): Merci !
MaliMrav (2026-05-26 05:44:27+00:00): Da li je naziv ulice Ustanička ili Kriva čaršija? Da li ima tabla na ulici i šta na njoj piše?
Alexa3r (2026-05-26 13:55:58+00:00): Ulica je Ustanicka, lokali su registrovani na adresi Ustanicka.
MaliMrav (2026-05-26 14:03:39+00:00): Ok, tako mi izgleda i da je na RGZ sloju, a i kućni brojevi se slažu. Ispravio sam i ostale nazive (name:sr, name:sr-Latn i int_name) da budu Ustanička.
aTarom (2026-05-22 19:18:28+00:00): Hi, according to the wiki, the tag
"fire_hydrant:diameter"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fire%20hydrant:diameter?uselang=en
refers to the diameter of the supply pipe, not the fittings diameters. Am I interpreting this incorrectly?
Cheers
tonikny (2026-05-22 20:10:33+00:00): Si, això és el que he vist també, la forma correcta crec que és fire_hydrant:couplings:diameters. De la wiki:
Description
The size of the connection fitting used to interface with the hydrant.
S'hauria de revertir la versió 2?
Nordpfeil (2026-05-23 10:30:16+00:00): Ahora lo veo. Voy a revertirlo más tarde. Al otro lado estoy irritado por los 100 mm. Según sepa utilizan en España el acoplamiento tipo "Barcelona" que está disponible según UNE 23400 en 3 tamaños (25, 45 y 70 mm).
tonikny (2026-05-24 07:00:26+00:00): La norma UNE 23400 también incluye el modelo de 100mm:
https://es.scribd.com/document/587752617/UNE-23400-5-1998
Nordpfeil (2026-05-24 11:11:32+00:00): Gracias para la información actualizada
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 11:10:33+00:00): Reverted SEO spam POI in a private residential dwelling, with no apparent verifiable location on the ground, in changeset 184348654

https://osm.org/changeset/184348654
mavl (2026-05-23 07:30:26+00:00): Здравствуйте. Сомнительно, что супермаркет (большой магазин) находится в маленьком здании.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:shop%3Dsupermarket
OlasMapy (2026-05-22 12:08:34+00:00): You edited a road in Masuria and a pharmacy in Brazil. Please keep your changesets local.
Filip009 (2026-07-16 13:02:48+00:00): Hello, why is this one way street? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/867691894
Filip009 (2026-07-16 13:16:00+00:00): Sorry, now I understand, there was just restriction moreover, which was not needed anymore https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11843416. So I just deleted it. Sorry for disturbing you.
4004 (2026-07-16 22:33:45+00:00): no problem, was a while ago but I think this was based on a survey as I was driving past and Magic Earth didn't reflect the one way so I missed the restriction
Marvk (2026-06-22 10:42:50+00:00): Hallo Geocrest.

Warum hast du https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24667827 zu highway=service geändert? Dieser way gehört zur einmündenden Straße und ist somit meiner Meinung nach ganz klar highway=tertiary.

Beste Grüße
Marv