piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
sanchi (2023-10-02 19:07:53+00:00): Como ya se te ha comentado no es así. Ya te lo hemos indicado varias personas.
Puedes corroborar todo lo que te estamos indicando consultando la wiki de openstreetmap en la que está todo explicado. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dservice
Aquí puedes ver que en ningún sitio pone que sea lo que tú estas indicando una vía de servicio. 
Y aquí puedes ver el uso de la etiqueta access
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:access

Además una cosa es el etiquetado de openstreetmap y otra cosa es el que use catastro o cualquier otro mapa. 

Se te ha pedido varias veces que no borres datos reales del mapa. La Próxima vez me temo que tendremos que denunciarlo al DWG por vandalismo y que tome medidas ante el borrado incorrecto de los datos.

Que no este en otros sitios añadido solo significa que falta de añadir al mapa, faltan muchas cosas por añadir a openstreetmap. Por tu lógica nunca habría existido ningún mapa porque cuando se empezó hacer cualquier mapa no estaba completo.
BeaZal (2023-10-04 17:50:29+00:00): Hola,
 
La política OSM es reflejar la realidad, esa vía es la vía de acceso del caserío Zalbide, debía de terminar al comienzo del caserío y no atravesar las fachada Oeste y Norte, es la información que contiene el PNOA de España. 

Es verdad que la información que contiene b5m.gipuzkoa.net calles 001 atraviesa las dos fachadas. Sin embargo, la página b5m.gipuzkoa.net tiene el siguiente aviso legal: “la información contenida en este sitio web tienen carácter meramente informativo, por lo que se deberá comprobar la vigencia y exactitud de los datos en las fuentes administrativas oficiales correspondientes.” 

Es por ello por lo que solicito verificar la exactitud esos datos en la Administración competente, que es el Ayuntamiento de Abaltzisketa en este caso. Esa información puede verificarse en el Plan General de Ordenación de Abaltzisketa, en el plano IV.1 infraestructuras de comunicación.


Por otro lado, veo que los cambios solo se han reflejado en la capa Estándar, se deberían modificar en el resto de las capas.

Saludos,
sanchi (2023-10-04 20:12:51+00:00): Creo que deberías documentarte de cómo funciona OpenStreetMap para entender en lo que te estas equivocando mensaje tras mensaje.

Por ejemplo OpenStreetMap no es un mapa sino una base de datos espacial. Por ello lo que hay que tener es el dato en la bbdd. Los render o capas cogen los datos de la bbdd. Depende del render puede que salga la información hoy mañana o dentro de 1 mes según cuando se actualice, puede que dependiendo de lo que quiera representar el render en unos salga y en otros no. OpenStreetMap está pensado para muchos usos diferentes y según los mismos mostrará información diferente.

En OpenStreetMap no está atravesando ninguna fachada de la casa, en b5m.gipuzkoa.net como indicas esta mal. Pero en OpenStreetMap no es así, y se ve claramente por PNOA por donde pasa la vía. OpenStreetMap es bastante más amplio que las fuentes que estás comentando por lo que puede abarcar más información y no por ello va a ser incorrecto.

Cualquier duda puedes consultarlo con la comunidad tanto por los foros, como por telegram, como por la lista de correo. Seguir insistiendo aquí no es el lugar adecuado.

Saludos.
BlackyP8 (2023-11-28 00:04:09+00:00): Hallo MartinHorn112,

wenn am umgebenden Gebäude die Adresse bereits vermerkt ist, ist es überflüssig und schlechter zu Pflegen und daher besser zu vermeiden, wenn die darinliegenden Punkte diese Adresse nochmal getaggt haben.

LG und frohes Mappen
BlackyP8
BlackyP8 (2023-12-06 23:31:16+00:00): Ich habe die doppelten Adressen entfernt ->
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144847566
eggie (2023-10-01 17:23:02+00:00): Dag Voxberg...  Op dat eerste stuk is niets te zien van iets dat op een shared lane zou lijken. 
Vraag me zelfs af of je die belijning op de verder  hoofdrijbaan voor een shared_lane zou kunnen doorgaan?
Daar past een fiets niet op.
MVG
eggie
Voxberg (2023-10-02 05:48:30+00:00): Wel wat smal inderdaad. Welke optie is dan meer van toepassing?
eggie (2023-10-02 08:25:13+00:00): Hoi,

Het is al getagd met masxspeed=60  
De belijning ondersteunt dat. 60 km wegen hebben bijna altijd dit soort belijning en zijn een aanwijzing dat het om een 60 km weg gaat. 

https://verkeersregels.vvn.nl/situatie/belijning-60-kmh

Fietssuggestiestroken zijn het niet hier. Die zijn breder en hebben tot doel de weg smaller te laten lijken.
Soms zelfs met oranje stroken. Niet te verwarren met fietsstroken. Die hebben een fietssymbool op de weg.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dshared_lane


Kun je het zelf verwijderen? 
PS  Volgens mij is het verder verloop ook alleen voor motorvoertuigen met bestemmingsverkeer. Klopt dat? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-10-02 08:28:24+00:00): en die lijn langs de zijkanten telt inderdaad niet mee als lane_markings
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lane_markings
eggie (2023-10-02 08:57:06+00:00): cycleway=shared_lane heb ik vast verwijderd. Was nu toch bezig. 
MVG
eggie
Voxberg (2023-10-02 11:50:39+00:00): Was een bord met geen toegang voor auto's, tussen bepaalde tijden in de ochtend. Weet niet meer precies hoe dat zit, dus heb ik niet opgeven
eggie (2023-10-02 11:59:02+00:00): Oke....   Dat zal wel zijn om sluiproutes in de spits te voorkomen.

We taggen dat ... even alleen  als voorbeeld... zo
motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ (Mo – Fri 11.00 - 18.00; Sa 11.00 - 17.00; Su 12.00 - 17.00) 

Iets dus nog om uit te zoeken. 

Ik zal een opmerking op de kaart zetten.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-10-02 12:01:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3919547#map=16/52.1534/5.4486&layers=N
ivanbranco (2023-10-03 09:15:07+00:00): Ciao Simonetta, benvenuta su OSM

ho notato che hai cancellato una parte della scuola, come mai?

Qua https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/254150182 hai aggiunto il tag building (edificio) all'area scolastica (che non é un edificio).

Se sono errori posso ripristinare la situazione precedente. Se hai domande o dubbi chiedi pure.

buon mapping!
SIMONETTA VERUCCHI (2023-10-08 17:14:38+00:00): Sì, grazie. 
Ripristina la situazione precedente
KasperSFranz (2023-11-19 11:36:25+00:00): Hi,
You added both not:operator:wikidata=Q638098 and operator:wikidata=Q638098

I am guessing the not:operator is wrong so I have removed it.
Branko Kokanovic (2023-10-01 21:51:56+00:00): Izbrišite ova imena "bus stop" za ime stanice. To nije ime:)
Милош Бабић (2023-10-02 08:03:56+00:00): Решено.
pitscheplatsch (2023-10-01 17:26:18+00:00): Just a test?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Dimitar155 (2023-10-01 18:36:22+00:00): Reverted, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142000384
harahu (2023-10-01 20:18:19+00:00): Hei Turid. Jeg ser du er en ny bruker. Velkommen skal du være, og jeg håper du får gjort mange konstruktive bidrag til OSM. Det ser dog ut til at ditt første bidrag er en feiltakelse. Du sletter deler av en sti som ikke slutter, men går helt til veien, slik den var inntegnet. Om det skulle være noen tvil; stien er synlig på både flyfoto og ved manuell inspeksjon.

Jeg må derfor korrigere endringen din. Jeg vil råde deg til å heller begynne din OSM-karriere med å tegne inn noen manglende sier i stedet. Jeg tror det vil bli satt mer pris på enn dette.
Turid Nordbye (2023-10-04 18:52:31+00:00): Jeg savner fortsatt bilde fra 1962. Er det vanskelig å finne stien på bildet fra 1962 siden du ikke sender noe til meg?
pootriarch (2023-10-01 15:55:13+00:00): marked for review because not sure of 'traffic island' tag on the barrier
eggie (2023-10-01 16:36:27+00:00): Beste Arony..
Je kunt  niet zomaar turn: lanes :forward toevoegen zonder aan te geven hoeveel 'lanes' de weg heeft en hoe zit het dan met het verkeer van noord naar zuid?
Alles geeft nu een foutmelding op de IJsselkade.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-10-01 17:10:23+00:00): Example for a road with both directions

There are two lanes on the road in each direction. Those lanes running in the same direction as the osm-way are considered to be "forward"; the others "backward". The left lane of the forward direction will turn left and the right lane will go straight through and also turns right. The left lane of the backward direction will go straight through, the right lane will turn right and also continue straight through.

 turn:lanes:forward=left|through;right
 turn:lanes:backward=through|through;right

Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn#Identifying_a_turn_indication
eggie (2023-10-01 17:13:58+00:00): en
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forward_%26_backward,_left_%26_right
Voorbeeld
The lanes=* tag is another good example of a direction-dependent feature: A road with several lanes can have a different number of lanes for traffic in each direction. A common case is for example lanes=3, lanes:forward=1, lanes:backward=2,
A67-A67 (2023-10-01 17:23:54+00:00): Ik heb de ontbrekende tags lanes=3 en lanes:forward=2 toegevoegd.

Daarnaast heb ik ook de voorsorteervakken door laten lopen tot aan de kruising. Ze waren slechts tot het fietspad getagd.
eggie (2023-10-01 18:01:23+00:00): Thanks... 
Wellicht dat Aronyx nog reageert.
Leonar25 (2023-10-01 16:00:02+00:00): VÍA INTERCONECTORA DESDE POZO NEGRO HASTA LA AV. JESÚS

https://munipaucarpata.gob.pe/tag/paucarpataeducacionsaludyprogreso/page/5
DressyPear4 (2023-10-02 03:36:02+00:00): Adicione um comentário em suas edições para que outros possam entender o que você está mapeando
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141995038
Leonardogr (2023-10-02 16:11:39+00:00): Incluindo o Residencial Bueno América no mapa.
DressyPear4 (2023-10-02 20:48:31+00:00): O comentário seria no lugar do .(ponto) ao enviar os dados.
Faz parte das boas práticas
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Good_changeset_comments
ivanbranco (2023-10-03 09:18:49+00:00): Ciao Rox90, benvenut su OSM

ho notato qualcosa di strano con i parchi.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1212258049/history
questo sembra un po' troppo piccolo per essere un parco pubblico, inoltre é occupato per la maggior parte da alberi. Forse volevi mappare il fatto che ci fosse dell'erba? in tal caso puoi usare landuse=grass

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1212258048/history
Uguale qua, inoltre questo parco é giá contenuto in un parco piú grande. Il parco piú grande ha ora nome "Parco Divisione Siena." é giusto che ci sia il punto dopo Siena? O é un errore di digitazione?

Buon mapping
blackhat8669 (2023-10-01 16:11:52+00:00): not sure can't delete changes
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-10-20 23:28:38+00:00): revertido, voce deletou a forma da escola e colocou um ponto no lugar.
empty_child (2023-10-01 21:05:01+00:00): Reverted due to the bad quality (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142005203)
unodecrespos (2023-10-01 17:15:51+00:00): Gracias por revisar los picos de la zona
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141995403
pootriarch (2023-10-01 16:12:53+00:00): there's no destination-style signage for this ramp, but not clear if osm requires us to make one up for every link (in which case the previous designation of 'south van ness ave' would be reasonable but misleading, since one lane enters the freeway directly)
aTarom (2023-10-03 06:01:47+00:00): hello, thanks for editing, is the tag
"external_uri"="Hotel Elimar,-c27016-h187920"
an import mistake?
Cheers
RobChafer (2023-10-03 07:41:06+00:00): I have no idea how that got there.  I can only imagine it must be a quirk of Organic Maps. Curiously it was the only change in an edit.
user_14538650 (2023-10-04 01:11:08+00:00): Cố lên :)
map per (2023-10-01 17:45:34+00:00): Are you kidding me?
LockOnGuy (2023-10-01 16:44:22+00:00): Hello ڕاستی,       
          
I see you edited node 5318704122 in this changeset, and this node had an Arabic name that you removed previously in v3. since it's a valid name, Can you restore it?       
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5318704122/history       
          
Also, what is the source for the name change in node 6419370285?        
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6419370285/history        
         
Regards.
ڕاستی (2023-10-04 19:21:17+00:00): Because this place have names just in Kurdish and English.
LockOnGuy (2023-10-04 19:46:26+00:00): I asked you 2 questions, the reason, and the source.      
What was your source for the change? did you actually survey and saw the name?       
I'm asking this because you previously changed names of business and even some changeset have "survey" in the source but the name you change into do not match the name on the sign and the previous one was the correct, example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139192329       
So please, what is your sources for the name change here? did you actually survey it? or did you just translate the name?      
Regards.
ڕاستی (2023-10-04 20:23:05+00:00): https://www.facebook.com/MultiFruity/videos/-%DA%AF%D8%B1%D9%88%D9%BE%DB%8C-%D9%85%DB%95%DA%B5%D8%AA%DB%8C-%D9%81%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%AA%DB%8C-%D9%84%D9%82%DB%8C-6-%D9%85%DB%95%DA%B5%D8%AA%DB%8C-%D9%81%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%AA%DB%8C-%DA%A9%DB%95%D8%B4%DB%8E%DA%A9%DB%8C-%D8%AA%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%A8%DB%95%D8%AA%DB%8C-%D8%A8%DB%86-%D8%AF%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B3%D8%AA-%DA%A9%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%88%D9%88%D9%86-%DA%AF%DB%95%D8%B1-%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%A6%DB%8E%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%A7-/612038340026481/
LockOnGuy (2023-10-04 20:46:11+00:00): Thank you, but the link you share for the ice cream shop do not match the name you put as 'name'             
You used      
name=شیرینەمەنی و ساردەمەنی مەڵتی فروتی ٦      
And that doesn't match the shop sign shown in the video, the name should be      
name=گروپی مەڵتی فروتی 
to match name on the store sign.      
Please, don't translate names like that, and use the actual names on the sign instead.       
                 
Also, what was the source for the pharmacy name change?    
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6419370285/history                
is it this one?      
https://i.ibb.co/B3SpjFb/erbilph-1281.jpg       
Or do you have a different pic?           
              
Regards.
ڕاستی (2023-10-04 21:45:19+00:00): The name you are talking about is for the company which is گروپی مەڵتی فروتی not the branch
LockOnGuy (2023-10-04 21:50:07+00:00): It’s the name on the sign, the branch address and details should be in addr and description tag.      
The name on the sign should be the name on ‘name’ tag.      
What’s about my question that I asked above? What about the pharmacy?      
If you can’t provide a source for the name or specify your source for the name change I will restore the old ‘name’ that you changed.      
Regards.
empty_child (2023-10-01 21:04:09+00:00): Reverted due to the bad quality (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142005172)
Elian D (2023-10-01 17:39:08+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/ElianD/Improve_street_prefixes_in_Romania for more info.
silversurfer83 (2023-10-02 18:59:40+00:00): Hi there :)

two little things:
a) are you really sure there is a path? If so, how do you know? Please give a source because I can't make out any paths using aerials.
b) please do not connect highways (paths, tracks, ...) to borders or landuse areas even if they cross them. They do not belong together. Thank you.

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141996570
ivanbranco (2023-10-28 11:35:07+00:00): Hi The CraddingGuy,

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/68564750

why you deleted the building=* tag, isn't it a building? Also, you created a new fuel, but there's still the one mapped as a node, so there's a duplicate right now. Could you check it out?

thanks and good mapping
TheCraddingGuy (2023-10-28 18:55:10+00:00): I must have misclicked there or the app I am using made an error and deleted it without me noticing. The building is a gas station. If I recall correctly, you have to pay inside the gas station building for the gas you get at the node.
Elian D (2023-10-01 17:39:15+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/ElianD/Improve_street_prefixes_in_Romania for more info.
empty_child (2023-10-01 21:06:41+00:00): Reverted due to the bad quality (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142005232)
Elian D (2023-10-01 17:39:18+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/ElianD/Improve_street_prefixes_in_Romania for more info.
Elian D (2023-10-01 17:39:21+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/ElianD/Improve_street_prefixes_in_Romania for more info.
Elian D (2023-10-01 17:39:23+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/ElianD/Improve_street_prefixes_in_Romania for more info.
Maris33 (2023-10-01 17:00:19+00:00): created route master bus 3002
felipeeugenio (2023-10-01 18:22:40+00:00): Hola Javier. por favor revisar los tags de las calles que borras (que no deberían llegar y borrar cosas si lo que necesitas es solo modificarlas) y ver si acaso en la calle que agregas no estás perdiendo dichos tags. Acá borraste los roles de los caminos sin mas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141997565
ivanbranco (2023-10-03 09:25:17+00:00): Hi afarcase,

now Via Grangia and Via Sacra Croce aren't connected anymore, was this edit intended or is a mistake?
ivanbranco (2023-10-03 09:22:41+00:00): Ciao McBixio, benvenut su OSM

attenzione, spostando l'entrata avevi modificato anche la geometria dell'edificio, creandogli una rientranza che in realtá non ha. Magari la prossima volta puoi estrarre il nodo e posizionarlo nella posizione desiderata. Ho corretto io.

Buon mapping!
McBixio (2023-10-11 07:10:03+00:00): Ok grazie e scusate per l'errore... Starò più attento.
jimkats (2023-10-05 15:51:51+00:00): What are these three "places" with no tags at all? Can you please give any information or at least update them? Because nodes with no info at all don't make any sense. One of them looks like pointing on a building.
MDH (2023-10-05 19:35:11+00:00): I think they're glitches - I've just started using Vespucci and it loved to create a node every time you touch the map!  Tha is for flagging, will log in and tidy up.
jimkats (2023-10-05 20:19:34+00:00): No worries. I like that it's almost in a perfect vertical line :d
MDH (2023-10-06 06:32:51+00:00): Accidental edits reversed by changeset #142205552
SekeRob (2025-01-07 13:33:57+00:00): Ciao Sabina,

Per favore, guarda questo oggetto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141744255

Potete dirmi che cos'è questo cerchio etichettato come prateria e chiamato Dolina? Non c'è nulla 'sul terreno' che dimostri che questo cerchio sia reale, ipv vedo praterie di 2 densità e foreste all'interno dell'anello. Dato che non è etichettato come 'interno' alla foresta, l'intera area con gli alberi è renderizzata dalla mappa Carto standard.

Grazie
SekeRob
qugeb (2023-12-18 11:26:22+00:00): Vandalismus!!!
pitscheplatsch (2023-10-03 15:50:09+00:00): Hi.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
BCNorwich (2023-10-02 07:59:19+00:00): Hi, I've removed a few duplicated sections of footpath on the Arran Coastal Path here.

Regards Bernard.
Leonardogr (2023-10-02 16:13:43+00:00): Incluindo prédio residencial no mapa.
pi11 (2024-02-12 16:03:39+00:00): You've added a lot of overlapping/duplicate buildings with this changeset as well as buildings that are present in PICC numerical but are clearly not correct on aerial imagery. I've fixed a part of this area with #147373658, but please be carefull when importing like this.
Kind regards
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:56:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143714006, 143714008 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits eines benutzers nach selbstlöschung
mga_geo (2023-10-04 05:56:30+00:00): Bonjour,
Attention aux relations route=bus lors de la modification avec iD de voies, cela casse très souvent la continuité du tracé.
Je viens de rétablir avec JOSM pour r13690222.
Marc
Luke Patwell (2023-10-04 08:02:53+00:00): Désolé pour le problème créé. Beaucoup à découvrir après 2 jours d'utilisation.
Merci Marc.
Myazyk (2023-10-31 18:00:12+00:00): Ти зробив білий прямокутник на карті на частині цвинтвря
Dimitar155 (2023-10-31 20:21:28+00:00): Це проблема Carto. Дивіться https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/4319.
Filip009 (2023-10-03 12:03:44+00:00): Zdravím, na mapathone, alebo nejakom podujatí, kde si začínala mapovať ti určite hovorili, že budovy treba zahranatiť pomocou klávesovej skratky Q alebo pravý klik na čiaru budovy a kliknúť na tlačidlo zahranatiť. Nezabúdaj na to ;)

Filip
aTarom (2024-03-24 12:21:01+00:00): hola , gracias por editar, cuando puedas mira estos 4 collados, parece que la app LoPoi los colocó con iguales coordenadas?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11232278321/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11232282040/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11232263600/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11232295338/history
Saludos
AgusOrux (2024-03-26 07:10:25+00:00): Hola. Gracias por avisar. Desconozco lo que pudo pasar con LoPoi. Ahora me preocupa que se haya producido el error en más lugares.
Eliminé los collados y dejé el correcto.

Un saludo
Nakaner-repair (2024-04-03 13:51:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149526581 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user astrica (deletions/modifications without providing a sufficient explanation)
KKS (2023-10-03 17:04:50+00:00): Поясніть навіщо ви створили вже існуюче урвище в Голосіївському лісі?
Stereo (2023-10-20 02:15:19+00:00): Thank you for fixing the sidewalks I'd accidentally tagged as crossings!
eggie (2023-10-01 19:42:14+00:00): Dag Martin. Je vraagt feedback. Lijkt me oke zo. 
Lastig te zien of het pad werkelijk zo loopt. 
Het beste kun je PDOK actueel als achtergrond zetten. 
Wanneer je het AHN hoogtebestand als achtergrond zet zie je de paden goed lopen onder het geboomte. Ik heb het met ahn iets beter uitgelijnd. 
Zie http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~allroads/NLOSMOK/OSMOKNL/OSMOKNL.html#map=18.95/52.2871/6.5227/0

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-10-01 19:43:24+00:00): Even die laag BGT overlays uitzetten in de link om het beter te zien.
user_5359 (2023-10-02 14:04:59+00:00): Hello! What is the mean of the tags
area_ha=15946.8748046021
farm_name=Port Edgar
farm_stats=Port Edgar
id=173
latitude=-52.046 (only a node can have a coordinate)
longitude=-60.361
oid=579.0
ownership=Michael Alazia, Felicity, Faya (did you mean owner?)
type=boundary (this area isn't closed area)
wider_area=West Falkland (did you mean is_in?)
Did you need this information in OSM?
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-10-01 19:49:52+00:00): Hallo DanieCeBus,
wenn möglich bitte vorhandene Objekte nicht löschen, sondern anpassen, damit die Historie erhalten bleibt.

Ein Tipp für das Eintragen von Gebäuden: Mit der Taste "Q" kann man Umrisse rechtwinklig machen.
Viele Grüße
DanieCeBus (2023-10-02 16:39:33+00:00): Ah super vielen Dank für den Tipp!
vichada (2023-10-01 19:37:19+00:00): gnss (rtk/sapos), bicycle, survey
Nakaner-repair (2024-04-03 13:51:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149526581 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user astrica (deletions/modifications without providing a sufficient explanation)
woodpeck (2023-10-09 10:07:41+00:00): Dear Maloss34, in this changeset you re-added the names "Zero", "Asso", and "TNT" to several mountain bike trails. In  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141477633, mapper Andrea Del Sarto writes that these names are not official. Can you please provide a source (ideally a photo that shows signs on the ground) for your naming?
woodpeck (2023-10-09 10:08:39+00:00): Asking in the course of handling DWG ticket Ticket#2023071410000373. If you cannot show a valid source for your edits, please stop adding these names to OSM.