piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nevw (2023-12-13 01:11:24+00:00): Hi, osmi has picked up an issue here that needs correcting.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.56149&lat=-28.87015&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik+Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Lockstar (2023-12-13 01:25:31+00:00): Fixed - thanks
puchaczowsky (2023-12-07 19:31:19+00:00): dodałeś nieistniejący budynek: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1229252124
tastrax (2023-12-07 21:59:51+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
osmoj (2023-12-09 22:40:21+00:00): Hallo unknown-user-119,
willkommen bei OpenStreetMap erstmal! :)

Es ist nicht üblich Namen und Website von Unternehmen, etc. an Adressknoten zu taggen. Deshalb habe ich diese und eine ähnliche Änderung in Änderungssatz#144949499 [1] zunächst rückgängig gemacht und deine Änderungen in Änderungssatz#144950003 [2] wieder korrekt als separate Knoten ergänzt.

Viele Grüße

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144949499
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144950003
unknown-user-119 (2023-12-11 07:39:29+00:00): Hallo und vielen Dank für das Feedback.
An welcher Stelle ist mir der Fehler unterlaufen? Was muss ich bei weiteren Eintragungen anders handhaben?
Liebe Grüße
osmoj (2023-12-13 19:42:08+00:00): Die beiden Knoten ([1] und [2]), zu denen du Name und Webseite hinzugefügt hast waren reine Adressen, d.h. an diesen sollten auch nur Adressdaten eingetragen werden.
Deine Intention eine Marketingagentur [3] und einen Saxophonisten [4] einzutragen setzt du besser um, indem du jeweils einen neuen Knoten erstellst (der natürlich direkt neben dem Adressknoten liegen kann) und entsprechend mit einem Haupttag (sprich: Knotentyp) versiehst. In meiner Korrektur [5] kannst du dir das beispielhaft ansehen. Der passende Knotentyp ist hierbei `office=yes` bzw. `office=marketing`.

VG osmoj

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/744697404/history
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3470964352/history
[3] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144858991
[4] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144858730
[5] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144950003
unknown-user-119 (2023-12-14 12:06:48+00:00): Okay vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Werde ich zukünftig berücksichtigen!
GPar (2023-12-07 15:10:31+00:00): "aeroway=building" is wrong! 
Please check guide: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway 
If doesn't exist, leave "building=yes" thanks
quentinsto (2024-01-31 08:09:18+00:00): Ce changement rétablit l'ancien rond-point (visible sur les images BDOrtho IGN). La version précédente (visible sur images Bing ou Esri) est à rétablir
sheldonelectric (2024-01-31 09:58:45+00:00): Bien vu, j'ai utilise les images anciennes. Je vais rectifier.
sheldonelectric (2024-02-03 16:16:06+00:00): J'ai rectifie avec Bing, mais je remarque que Esri a des images differentes, notemment les buildings de la rue de l'electricite.
quentinsto (2024-02-03 17:24:13+00:00): Merci ! Je passe régulièrement dans la zone, c'est bien la version Esri qui est la bonne !
Hufkratzer (2023-12-07 15:45:04+00:00): This area looks like a riding arena and not like a riding centre. The same is true for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1229253932. Riding arenas should be tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian. Compare previous discussions:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144783334
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144858341
Bear-in-a-box (2023-12-08 12:53:27+00:00): Indeed. What I had put is:

leisure-horse_riding
sport-equestrian

will chnage to 
leisure-pitch. 

thanks for checking.
osmoj (2023-12-09 22:40:42+00:00): Hallo unknown-user-119,
willkommen bei OpenStreetMap erstmal! :)

Es ist nicht üblich Namen und Website von Unternehmen, etc. an Adressknoten zu taggen. Deshalb habe ich diese und eine ähnliche Änderung in Änderungssatz#144949499 [1] zunächst rückgängig gemacht und deine Änderungen in Änderungssatz#144950003 [2] wieder korrekt als separate Knoten ergänzt.

Viele Grüße

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144949499
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144950003
eggie (2023-12-07 09:59:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
flohoff (2023-12-07 10:04:37+00:00): Moin,
nur weil ich mal wieder nebenbei OSM Changesets durchsehe in OWL:

Bei so langen namen komme ich immer ins Grübeln - Das Problem ist ja - das findet bei Nominatim Niemand.

Was hälst du davon in den name das "Paderkind" zu packen und in den long_name das ganze?

Eine halbe Bibel auf der Karte abzudrucken (Oder auch nicht weil das Label dann ganz unterdrückt wird weil es nicht hin passt) ist irgendwie kontraproduktiv.

"Paderkind Praxis für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Gemeinschaftspraxis Irmgard Gockel, Petra Schulte, Ruth Niewels, Jennifer Sender, Maria Schulte"

Flo
bielebog (2023-12-07 10:54:06+00:00): Hi, stimmt, das ist zu üppig geraten. Ich hab das mal auf name="Paderkind" geändert und die operators= genutzt, denn long_name=* ist mit knapp 5000 Nutzungen ja nun auch nicht so etabliert https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/long_name
flohoff (2023-12-07 11:25:40+00:00): 
Das mit dem Long Name wäre für mich nur der Weg das in den Nominatim Index zu bekommen ohne die Karte vollzutexten ;)
Frans S (2023-12-08 15:09:10+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, you added the shadow line often into your mapping. The shadow is no part of a building !

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144859304
Frans S (2023-12-08 15:10:50+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
No buildings were squared at all.
Mappings are not always accurate.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144859321
desertivy (2023-12-07 14:17:57+00:00): it does not match the official map of the area

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144868835
Frans S (2023-12-08 15:22:38+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, not all fair squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144859520
bxl-forever (2023-12-07 10:30:52+00:00): Hello,

We fixed the tags for the Polish shop in Brussels.

The "beach" POI has been removed.

Lidl was already on the map.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10968991406

Next time, please update changes separately instead of one bulk upload spanning over different countries.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Tomas_J (2025-08-05 22:48:04+00:00): Ahoj, na priechode Node: 1710440843 a inych som od teba nasiel nespravne pridane crossing:island=yes. Opravil som na no.
Tomas_J (2025-07-06 10:00:42+00:00): Zdar, priechod na  Node: 9968249577 a ine nema ostrovcek. Opravil som.
rempshaener (2025-09-11 16:21:36+00:00): Hallo,
nur als Hinweis: Deine Änderungen scheint hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171766574 bzw. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4491538 jemand anders zu sehen.
Viele Grüße
AndySchulte (2025-09-12 07:59:45+00:00): Hallo, Ich danke dir für deinen Hinweis.
Frans S (2023-12-08 15:26:00+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared at all.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144859987
ManuelB701 (2023-12-08 15:28:54+00:00): Sicher, dass 19:00:20-30 richtig sei?
Cenyr (2023-12-08 16:55:21+00:00): Ja, ich hatte die Öffnungs- bzw. Unterrichtszeiten extra abfotografiert.
ManuelB701 (2023-12-08 17:14:27+00:00): Was ich eigentlich meine ist, dass ich glaube, der zweite Doppelpunkt sowie der Strich vertauscht sind.
Cenyr (2023-12-08 18:40:22+00:00): Ah, jetzt sehe ich es.
Danke für den Hinweis, ist korrigiert.
Frans S (2023-12-08 15:20:27+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
I reviewed most of your changesets  to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Inaccurate mapped. 
Buildings not squared.

Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144860105
Frans S (2023-12-08 15:12:27+00:00): Hello. See my previous comment. The same issues here.
Please do not connect nodes of buildings to each other.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144860156
Frans S (2023-12-08 15:29:10+00:00): Hello. See my previous comment on your mappings. 
They are also valid for this changeset.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144860268
Frans S (2023-12-07 13:25:13+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
a remark. Do not include the shadow of a building in your mapping (black shadow line)
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144860298
Frans S (2023-12-08 15:16:05+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not upload every single mapping. 
Collect them until you are finished with a task or want to stop.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144860309
Frans S (2023-12-07 13:23:03+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Connected nodes of buildings to eachother,
Included the shadow in a mapping (often)
Not all buildings squared.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144860316
eggie (2023-12-07 10:33:54+00:00): Dag RoutiGo  Goed om zaken actueel te maken, maar svp geen wegen splitsen met editor iD  De routerelaties gaan dan stuk.
Schakel dan over naar editor JOSM Dan kan het wel.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-12-07 10:39:14+00:00): Routerelatie Julianaplein hersteld
eggie (2023-12-07 10:43:59+00:00): editor josm stap voor stap 

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047 

Bij splitsen deze editor gebruiken en daarna de routerelaties checken svp.

Kom je wegen met bv OV en S....  routerelaties tegen svp niet splitsen met editor iD anders wordt het veek werk om het weer goed te krijgen. 
A'dam zit natuurlijk vol met routerelaties. 
MVG
eggie
RoutiGo (2023-12-07 10:50:53+00:00): Eggie,

ok, we gaan daar op letten!
eggie (2023-12-07 10:55:15+00:00): Wanneer er geen routes lopen kun je overigens gewoon knippen met iD.
Succes,
eggie
eggie (2023-12-09 12:30:07+00:00): Ter info

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/amsterdam-30-km-h/106341
Udarian (2023-12-10 22:24:39+00:00): but from my understanding the previous tagging seems to be the best we have so it shoulnt have been removed, there will not always be a tag or set of tags that 100% correctly describes a feature but amenity=* , office=* etc. tagging is always necessary otherwise the data is useless due data consumers not being able to use it. 
this seems to be a honest mistake/misunderstanding of tagging norms in OSM. I am going to bring it back to what it was previously.
gscholz (2023-12-10 08:51:40+00:00): Hi montsec66,
your recent edits have left behind errors regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=1.42115&lat=42.36087&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144860512

As yo may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Frans S (2023-12-07 13:17:01+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
1 remark. please do not connect nodes of a building to other features or buildings nearby.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144860542
NieWnen (2023-12-09 18:06:30+00:00): Proszę nie dodawaj do adresów addr:country oraz addr:street:sym_ul.
sergeybe (2023-12-09 16:37:16+00:00): Пожалуйста, добавляйте в теги названий язык на котором это название, вот так name:uk=
В тег name= стоит записывать название на языке большинства населения живущего в редактируемой местности. Не надо путать людей, так как большинство название в Крыму было и есть на русском.
Frans S (2023-12-07 13:12:26+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144861129
eggie (2023-12-07 11:07:19+00:00): Dag tmk Het kan zo, maar je kun zo'n veldje ook als vlak mappen. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-12-07 11:08:18+00:00): typo kun > kunt  .. 
Het vlak van het speelveld heb ik wat uitgebreid.
poloroty (2023-12-07 11:00:40+00:00): Вышла ошибка, пункт работает
poloroty (2023-12-07 11:02:56+00:00): Кто имеет полномочия откатите, пожалуйста
silversurfer83 (2023-12-08 07:23:30+00:00): Moin TM34,

Herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Danke, dass du hilfst die Karte aktuell zu halten.

Du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht. ich mach das mal und gebe Feedback.

Wenn du dir die Situation vor angesehen hast, ist das hier alles soweit in Ordnung. Was wir bei OSM nicht machen dürfen, ist Daten aus Quellen übernehmen, deren Lizenz nicht mit der Lizenz von OSM kompatibel ist. Soweit ich das überblicken kann liegen für dein Bundesland leider keine passenden Quellen für Hausnummern vor, daher muss ich dich bitten die Finger vom Kataster zu lassen, wenn du hier Daten sammelst.
Eine gute Möglichkeit Adressen relativ bequem zu sammeln ist die App StreetComplete (Android) mit der du einfach beim Spazierengehen Daten sammeln kannst.

Solltest du Fragen haben, bitte immer raus damit. Entweder direkt oder im Forum unter c.osm.org oder in einer der Chatgruppen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144861665
eggie (2023-12-07 10:53:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Periodiek worden woningen en adressen  geïmporteerd vanuit het Kadaster. 
Je kunt een verzoek doen op het forum in het draadje BAG importverzoeken. Dan wordt er versneld geupdated.
Doe je dat zelf?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-12-07 10:58:50+00:00): Zie hier het forum
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43

De landuse en highway =construction heb ik toegevoegd
hindrikr (2023-12-07 11:19:47+00:00): Dag! Ik zag het voorbij komen, dankjewel :)
We wachten even op de automatische import. Ik heb het adres voor nu zo toegevoegd zodat het adres van de persoon gevonden kan worden.
eggie (2023-12-07 11:29:20+00:00): Oke.. maar er gaat niets automatisch.. wel periodiek. Zal straks wel even  een verzoek doen.
Hr eggie
hindrikr (2023-12-07 11:43:50+00:00): Ah check, excuus dat heb ik verkeerd begrepen! Ik wil best een poging doen hoor!
eggie (2023-12-07 12:11:47+00:00): Oke.. up to you.. de drempel ligt laag bij osm. Voeg deze hyperlink uit osm.org maar bij.
Succes
Eggie
eggie (2023-12-08 20:11:49+00:00): Inmiddels import verricht
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-11 21:26:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1229268439/history

this is likely only part of wastewater processing plant?

maybe that man made should be on entire plant?
aTarom (2023-12-07 14:34:44+00:00): Hola UrbexAlicante, bienvenido, gracias por editar, se ha desplazado este pico por error?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8858077259/history
ahora no cuadra la elevación en unos 88 metros
si no es un error, que fuente usas?
saludos
Jordi MF (2023-12-08 19:27:58+00:00): Hola UrbexAlicante,

Por favor, ten en cuenta que, en valenciano, el artículo inicial se escribe en minúscula. Por tanto, el topónimo 'el Boter' se escribe en minúscula en la etiqueta 'name' y en 'name:ca'.

Tu anterior usuario fue bloqueado por no explicar tus cambios y hacer caso omiso a la explicaciones que se te hicieron para usar la toponimia oficial, la de la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua, que es la entidad de la que tenemos permiso para nutrir la base de datos de OSM de la manera más correcta posible.
Saludos.
gscholz (2023-12-12 13:37:16+00:00): 

Hi montsec66,
this changeset has created errors regarding overlapping ways (blue marker):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=1.79835&lat=42.35605&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144862981

A you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-12-21 11:13:45+00:00): Hi montsec66, 
these errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
citrula (2023-12-07 11:56:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thank you for making the effort to contribute and improve the map. This change looks good, but in general bicycle=designated is not necessary on highway=cycleway, since this access is implied by the type of tag it is (see the wiki for more information about this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Worldwide ). If there's a particular routing issue you are trying to solve feel free to ask on OSMUS slack ( https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ ) or the community forums ( https://community.openstreetmap.org/ ) for assistance.

Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144863544
Something B (2023-12-07 11:59:01+00:00): Hi, Mateusz!
Minor issue: address duplication:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10785944117
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10206680730
Regards,
Something B.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-07 21:08:19+00:00): I have not changed addresses in this edit and lack info to change them
AntMadeira (2023-12-07 12:41:33+00:00): Olá, topolusitania.
Esta pista já não existe?
Passei lá há alguns meses e ainda lá estava...
Pode é já não estar a ser utilizada.
Mas assim sendo, o aeródromo também deveria indicar que está desativado (e tirar o "fechado" do nome).

Cumprimentos,
António.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144863719