piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
StefanHRT (2024-05-30 10:01:22+00:00): Hallo jensonBerlin,
der Park ist eine der über 2000 geschützten Grünanlage in Berlin (Tulpenschild). Dies unterliegt einem speziellen Gesetz, Radfahren muss per Beschilderung freigegeben sein und dies ist hier nicht gegeben ;)
VG Stefan
jensonBerlin (2024-05-30 13:59:02+00:00): Danke StefanHRT. Habe ich jetzt erst gesehen.
StefanHRT (2024-05-30 14:03:08+00:00): Kein Thema, deshalb weise ich Dich für die Zukunft auf die Besonderheit in Berlin hin ;) Hatte das übrigens wieder geändert bzw. die Wegeart angepasst.
VG Stefan
jensonBerlin (2024-05-30 14:23:08+00:00): Finde ich super!
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-30 08:18:36+00:00): The residential boundaries are not mapped well. Buildings need to be squared. Thanks for your contribution. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152020221
philippec (2024-05-30 15:21:11+00:00): Ik heb die AED aan het stadhuis van Sint Truiden heel precies gemapt met GRB.
Hoe hebt u het kunnen verbeteren ?
Schakkebroek (2024-06-02 09:26:40+00:00): Ben ter plaatse geweest, en er staan meerdere items op dezelfde locatie.
Een beetje meer overzicht leek mij  iets beter.
Mvrg, Schakkebroek
philippec (2024-06-02 11:10:47+00:00): Dat deed ik als beginner ook :)
Jakka (2024-05-30 09:28:18+00:00): pas correcte vous mettez le website comme value image:" image=https://www.vandervalkhotelspa.be" maintenant il y est double inscrit
Le value facebook done erreur ?
Chukart (2024-05-30 12:04:16+00:00): Bonjour, effectivement mais je ne savais pas quoi indiquer comme "value image". Je voulais chercher la photo de l'établissement mais je ne sais pas comment faire. Pourriez-vous m'aider et valider cette modification importante concernant cet établissement ? Merci.
Jakka (2024-05-30 12:15:26+00:00): Si il y a pas 'image' sans copyright en ne remplit pas. Vous n'est pas obliger d'ajouter....
mcliquid (2024-05-30 10:10:45+00:00): Merged duplicated node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152026333
o_s_m_app_er (2024-05-30 11:37:59+00:00): yes, realized that, too.  thanks
Carto'Cité (2024-09-17 10:45:15+00:00): Bonjour Praet Tri-Men,

Merci pour tes contributions sur les nouvelles pistes cyclables. Je suis curieux de savoir si tu as utilisé une source d'information ou si c'est ta mémoire du terrain qui t'ont permis de les numériser.

J'ai procéder à quelques modification sur les traversée cyclables.

Je vois que tu contribues avec iD. Pour les aménagements cyclables je conseille JOSM et le rendu Cyclo (https://gitlab.com/cartocite/MapCSS-JOSM-Bicycle).

Si tu fais du terrain n'hésite pas à prendre des photos pour Panoramax car il n'y en a pas dans ce secteur : https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/#background=streets&focus=map&map=17/48.924542/2.402183&speed=250

N’hésite pas à me contacter si tu as des question ou des remarques sur tous ces sujets 😀

Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
divaddivag (2024-05-30 09:04:24+00:00): Merci Enzo pour le boulot que tu as entrepris, je me sens un peu honteux de ne pas m'y être collé 😳 Dis-moi tu vois un coin qui mérite un peu attention D
Nzau (2024-05-30 10:45:53+00:00): Avec plaisir ! 
Je me suis rendu jusqu'à Clecy il y a quelques semaines, j'ai des images fraiches pour mettre à jour le tracé et essayer d'ajouter quelques infos ! 
Mais n'hésite pas à me dire si tu aperçois que le highway change de nouveau ^^ 
A+
divaddivag (2024-05-31 09:23:18+00:00): J'ai vu que ça borne sévère du coté des Dérailleurs, vous devez sacrément affûtés! Clécy est sur ma to-do liste depuis qu'ils ont sorti leur BAL et mettre à jour ce que j'avais fais l'an passé à partir du guide touristique de la SN. A réflexion de ce que fait karrs, ces véloroutes sont un fil rouge intéressants pour mieux focaliser la contribution, qui plus est pour public plutôt utilisateur d'OSM (contrairement à la rando pédestre). 
Cheers! D
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-30 08:40:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1287970344

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pesec (2024-05-30 10:28:18+00:00): Не первый раз вам пишу: если на перекрестке установлен знак "только направо", то и нужно устанавливать отношение с поворотом на право.
Зачем вы рисуете отсебятину с запретом левого поворота?
MilosBrzi (2024-05-30 08:57:39+00:00): Good change. Great job.
PT37XJ69G1 (2024-05-30 09:01:05+00:00): Thanks!
Fgjgdrou (2025-03-19 09:43:25+00:00): Hello MOTORSTEP, this changeset seems to be making an edit without source, as if someone is trying to advertise their services. It is possible that you may have made a test edit by accident, or a mistake. I’ve decided to undo your edit for now, but if I am mistaken, could you please reach out to me.
Whilst you can’t use OpenStreetMap for advertising, if you would like to add your business location(s) to the map, please feel free to reach out to me, and I would be happy to help.
user_19408540 (2024-05-31 17:07:56+00:00): What is your source?
Yousif Isam (2024-06-02 10:30:09+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/En:Baly
user_19408540 (2024-06-02 11:05:46+00:00): The names you added in this changeset is exactly 100% letter by letter with the exact punctuation marks from google maps with the same mistakes and typos. Some of those places added at the wrong location in Google maps and some are simply not existing at all on the ground  and you copied it to OSM. This is an import from Google maps. Please don't copy data from google maps as it's copyrighted and can hurt OSM with legal issues.
mapperich (2024-06-13 09:48:16+00:00): Hallo znrgl, 
weil ich grad gelesen hab, dass du deine wikidata phasen hattest/hast. Die hab ich auch, und falls du es noch nicht kennst, mit https://www.openstreetmap.at/checker/ geht es super einfach und man kann  zusätzlich noch ein paar tags mehr mit einem klick ergänzen. 
Lg Lukas
mapperich (2024-06-13 09:49:53+00:00): hier ist der Link zu dieser Mariensäule https://www.openstreetmap.at/checker/#bda/60794
znrgl (2024-06-21 15:34:30+00:00): Vielen Dank sgnak, das hab ich noch nicht gekannt! Voll gut zu wissen, ich freu mich schon darauf, damit herumzuspielen.
Total Crane System توتال کرین سیستم (2024-05-30 09:17:17+00:00): total crane system بالابر سازی توتال
Patchanka (2024-05-31 12:34:36+00:00): changeset annulé.
Vandalisme
Patchanka (2024-05-31 12:48:54+00:00): changeset annulé
Patchanka (2024-05-31 12:33:22+00:00): changeset annulé
Patchanka (2024-05-31 12:49:52+00:00): changeset annulé
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-30 10:13:52+00:00): Hi LMohamatar, welcome to OSM!

I guess something went wrong with your name of the following new map element, correct?

https://osm.org/way/1287983852
Patchanka (2024-05-31 12:26:55+00:00): merci de ne pas vandaliser la carte.
J'annule ces changements
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 12:31:14+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/152078993
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 12:31:28+00:00): Thanks, Patchanka !
Patchanka (2024-05-31 12:50:31+00:00): changement annulé
Syl (2024-05-30 13:03:14+00:00): Bonjour, non c'est l'attribut building:part qui doit être utilisé : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part
Une relation n'est pas adaptée ici.
Syl (2024-06-11 17:45:53+00:00): Je viens de corriger le bâtiment.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-30 10:13:30+00:00): Hi LUCAS ET LOUIS 4EVER, welcome to OSM!

I guess something went wrong with your name of the following new map element, correct?

https://osm.org/way/174833540
Patchanka (2024-05-31 12:47:07+00:00): merci @LUCAS ET LOUIS 4EVER de ne pas faire n'importe quoi. Cela s'appelle du vandalisme.

J'annule ce changement
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 12:51:29+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/152079713
rskedgell (2026-06-30 05:50:43+00:00): Please don't add layer=-1 (suggesting that the footway area is below ground, when it obviously is not) just to make warnings from the iD go away. It doesn't solve the problem, but it does make it harder to find and correct later.
eggie (2024-05-30 10:57:35+00:00): Dag Hoeksteentje

Tip  Gebruik amenity=drinking_water om je toevoeging aan de kaart zichtbaar te maken.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-30 10:58:30+00:00): aangepast
Herrieman (2024-06-03 22:48:18+00:00): Hoi Cas,
Bij dit soort technische edits is het altijd wel netjes om even een korte check uit te voeren of wat je aanpast nog wel klopt. In dit geval is de website niet meer bereikbaar want het restaurant is gesloten. Daardoor is jouw edit dus eigenlijk een soort van fout. 
Het bijhouden van winkels, horeca, e.d. is best een klus merk ik zelf ook altijd. Dus probeer ik dit soort edits altijd meteen even zo'n korte check uit te voeren. Ik zal het restaurant meteen even verwijderen.
CasGroenigen (2024-06-05 09:19:43+00:00): Hallo Herrieman,

Dit restaurant is zeer recentelijk gesloten bedenk ik me nu.
Ik weet niet zeker of ik de website daadwerkelijk heb gecheckt maar denk het wel.
Het kan zijn dat de website ergens in de afgelopen dagen offline is gehaald.
Herrieman (2024-06-05 09:40:09+00:00): Ja dat zou heel goed kunnen natuurlijk. Was ook meer een tip voor een volgende keer dan kritiek hoor!
Fizzie-DWG (2024-08-26 00:34:45+00:00): Reverted by DWG - apparent online only businesses, import & OEG

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155759529
Harry Wood (2024-07-19 10:09:17+00:00): Oh well done. I just spotted the new Maldron hotel is open here now, but I'm glad to see you beat me to it!
Harry Wood (2026-02-20 13:14:22+00:00): Just noticing on this edit (from a while ago now) you deleted the post office on Stroud Green Road. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/393464345/history   Was that deliberate? Adding a note to check: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5174608
citrula (2024-05-30 14:25:59+00:00): Hello, is there actually an office here, or do you guys only operate online?
bdentremont (2024-05-31 03:19:44+00:00): Have you been there, or can you otherwise identify the source for this info?
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-05 00:22:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152266030 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by user who added lots of fictional data
sikmir (2024-06-13 10:05:46+00:00): А зачем двойное название? Это если бы вершина находилась на границе, а тут одного армянского достаточно, второе в name:az.
Noktoborus (2024-06-13 10:13:27+00:00): Извиняюсь, случайно поставил: перепутал границу регионов с границей стран
ALu68 (2024-05-30 12:15:46+00:00): Hallo datschiburger,
du solltest mal erst überprüfen, was schon vorhanden ist:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8870902 ist bereits mit boundary=protected_area getaggt.

Diese Flächen entspechen auch mehr der Referenz: https://www.augsburg.de/fileadmin/user_upload/umwelt_soziales/umwelt/naturschutz/schutzgebiete_biotope/download/natur-undlandschaftsschutzgebiet/firnhaberauweide.jpg
Loop120 (2024-11-05 20:43:55+00:00): Just want to confirm, does Achmea Real Estate own the entirety of Kalverstraat and most of the building on its adjacent streets?
Dillen GJ (2024-11-07 12:11:24+00:00): Yes, read also: source. 1 of the sources is in Dutch but you can translate your self
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 17:19:53+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11944691068/history has app_operated = yes that was added in this edit
What app_operated=yes means here? Have you wanted to mark that you can control it with app in some way but app may be necessary or not? For example shop where you can scan and pay with app, without going through a traditional line. Or is it for objects where you need an app to use them at all? Then maybe app_operated=only would be better?

Note, this key seems undocumented on wiki, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:app_operated and
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 17:22:45+00:00): welp, this page actually exists now, I forgot to check it and I forgot that I tried to document it (feel free to check its correctness!)

sorry for last sentence being wrong
czubi (2024-05-31 15:27:53+00:00): Hallo, wenn du pfade in Fußwege änderst wäre es schön wenn du dann immer die entsprechenden Verkehrszeichen mit dranschreiben würdest. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/802174487
Sowas z.B. würde ich nicht als Fußweg ansehen, es sei denn es steht ein VZ239 da, an das ich mich dort aber nicht erinnern kann. Wenn du es in Fußweg änderst wird der Router es zum routen von Fahrradverbindungen meiden. Dies würde ich wiederum, gerade dort, als nicht korrekt ansehen. Was steht dort für ein VZ?
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 12:13:44+00:00): Should be check by the local community.

Thanks!
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-03 10:28:54+00:00): Hallo,

ein Teil der hier gelöschten Wege, sind im Luftbild erkennbar. Anstatt das sie gelöscht werden, sollten die Wege eher mit den entsprechenden Tags versehen werden. Ansonsten kommt nächste Woche wieder jemand und trägt sie hier bei OSM ein.

Als Tags bietet sich folgendes: z.B. disused:* oder access=*

Danke.
ma-rt-in (2024-06-16 19:04:41+00:00): Siehe Kommentare https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152067936
bxl-forever (2024-05-30 12:11:03+00:00): Reverted by changeset 152031907
bxl-forever (2024-05-30 12:11:00+00:00): Please do not add non-existing building structures to the map.  OSM is a map of the real world: those 10 buildings on top of existing buildings do not exist.

Reverted by changeset 152031888
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 12:13:26+00:00): Should be check by the local community.

Thanks!
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-03 10:28:44+00:00): Hallo,

ein Teil der hier gelöschten Wege, sind im Luftbild erkennbar. Anstatt das sie gelöscht werden, sollten die Wege eher mit den entsprechenden Tags versehen werden. Ansonsten kommt nächste Woche wieder jemand und trägt sie hier bei OSM ein.

Als Tags bietet sich folgendes: z.B. disused:* oder access=*

Danke.
ma-rt-in (2024-06-16 19:04:38+00:00): Siehe Kommentare https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152067936
mcliquid (2024-05-30 11:49:58+00:00): Hello and thank you for your contribution.

However, there are several inconsistencies in this change.
First of all, the ‘name’ tag is not used for information such as a block, but only for real names of objects that are labelled. ‘Gesperrt wegen Hangrutsch’ is not a name but a description and therefore ‘description’ should to be used.

On three ways, ‘highway’ has been completely removed so that these ways no longer have any function. If the paths no longer exist, they should be deleted. Otherwise, restore a correct highway attribute.

Do you need help with the changes?
FliWaTüt (2024-05-30 12:59:17+00:00): Hey there,

as there were:
1) a lot of hikers and bicycle riders at the neuralgic entry points to the paths, being confused and stopped by the barriers +
2) as there were not yet names given for the appropriate tracks,
I tried to "clarify" the situation for the map users IN ADVANCE, by entering the CLOSED situation in the "name field". I know that this field is NOT used for this purpose, BUT there is a lot of hassle in the complete area to this "lack of pre-trip planning information" of closures.
I have removed (as before) the "name field"

The tagging of "construction" is however correct as per
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction
which states:
_How to map the start of a road repair or reconstruction
Suppose there is a road highway=tertiary that has been closed for a longer period of time due to repair or reconstruction. It is then necessary to:
replace highway=tertiary tag with highway=construction
add construction=tertiary_

so my tagging:
highway=construction
construction=path
is correct, and the paths/tracks will be displayed + including their function, as I have tagged that in my local area a lot of times + for quite some time now.
mcliquid (2024-05-30 13:15:46+00:00): Hello and thanks for the reply.

A closed route (for pedestrians by means of traffic sign DE:259) can be labelled with ‘access=no’. If there is a construction site on the path, highway=construction + construction=path is of course correct.

However, this is now completely missing for these three paths after your change:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39230702
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61599495
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/605940379

Overall, it is not the task and obligation of OSM to manipulate the flow of visitors. We represent reality. If blocked: access=no, if construction site then highway=construction, if none of this but simply ‘Unwanted’, then enter none of this.

Anyway, I really appreciate your changes and just want to make sure that the data is correct. Thanks for that!
FliWaTüt (2024-05-30 15:33:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39230702
has a traffic_sign=DE:250 when entering from the south-easterly side (Wallhausen).

My entry with:
foot=yes
bicycle=no
horse=no
vehicle=no
is therefore correct.

As I understand it, the entry of an "access state", so access=yes or access=no is not necessary at all for any path or track, and:
if NOT entered as access=no, than generally considered as access=yes, ... but excluding an "no´s" for e.g. persons, animals (horses) or vehicles (bikes/motorcycles/etc.) entered as =no.
FliWaTüt (2024-05-30 15:36:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61599495
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/605940379
has no officially german-listed traffic_sign BUT:
has an official metal sign from the local forestry department + the german traffic_sign=DE:101

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Zeichen_101_-_Gefahrstelle,_StVO_1970.svg
mcliquid (2024-05-30 16:36:54+00:00): There is still the wrong "bicycle=dismount" which you added here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1246169877
FliWaTüt (2024-05-30 18:12:19+00:00): My tagging here is not wrong.

1) According to:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#access-dismount
it says:
Use bicycle=dismount when people are not permitted to cycle (e.g., through a graveyard) but are ALLOWED to DISMOUNT and BRING THE BIKE. See Bicycle#Bicycle restrictions. Note that bicycle=no is also commonly used where dismounting and PUSHING BICYCLE IS LEGAL.

2) According to DE:250
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:traffic_sign%3DDE:250
it says (the same thing !!!):
Verbot für Fahrzeuge aller Art
Anmerkungen: Gilt nicht für Handfahrzeuge, abweichend von § 28 Abs. 2 auch nicht für Tiere. Krafträder und FAHRRÄDER DÜRFEN GESCHOBEN WERDEN.

Therefore = BOTH
vehicle=no
AND
bicycle=dismount
IS CORRECT

... but I will alter it, so that everyone is happy
mcliquid (2024-05-30 20:37:06+00:00): I am confused about the capitalisation in capslock. It always feels like being shouted at. I'm not going to say anything more because I don't like being shouted at.
FliWaTüt (2024-05-30 20:43:35+00:00): There doesn‘t seem to be an other option in OSM to emphasize important words, other than using capital letters.
Neither _xyz_ nor using *xyz* seem to work for cursive nor fat letters.
limes11 (2024-07-08 20:33:49+00:00): What happened here ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61599495#map=15/47.7729/9.0801&layers=N

The highway-tag is gone ??!!
silversurfer83 (2024-05-30 12:13:50+00:00): Gude Jan :)

du hast hier "building=commercial" gesetzt. Da es sich hier vermutlich um ein älteres Gebäude welches zum Kloster gehört handelt, wäre "building:use" vermutlich besser geeignet, da der reine "building=*" tag beschreibt, was es für ein Gebäude ist, egal wofür es genutzt wird.
Vergleiche: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152030386
Tommybara (2024-06-20 20:17:28+00:00): Không nên lạm dụng đổi các đường thành primary!
Bạn hãy xem cách thành phố San Francisco, Mỹ phân loại các đường. Cả khu vực trung tâm thành phố cũng chỉ có vài ba đường được đánh là primary, còn đa số đều là secondary hết.
Tommybara (2024-06-20 20:23:09+00:00): Nguyên tắc là primary thông thường trước hết phải là đường hai chiều. Còn nếu nó là đường một chiều thì phải có một đường primary khác lưu thông chiều ngược lại. Ở đây cặp đường Điện Biên Phủ - Võ Thị Sáu có thể đánh primary được. Nhưng đối với đoạn NTMK 1 chiều thì có đến 3 đường để xe lưu thông chiều ngược lại cho tuyến này là Nguyễn Du, Võ Văn Tần và Nguyễn Đình Chiểu. Do đó đoạn NTMK này chỉ nên đánh secondary.
felipeeugenio (2024-05-30 12:29:29+00:00): Hola
addr:street es la calle.
addr:city es para la comuna.
addr:postcode es el código postal.

puedes chequear todo en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:*

Y por favor no usar contracciones. Se escribe Norte, no Nte.

gracias
vojtechzaboril (2024-05-30 11:48:27+00:00): Sorry for not splitting
Frank Peng (2026-01-18 23:23:19+00:00): The roads that you changed to highway=unclassified in this changeset would probably be better tagged as highway=service.
MichaelFS (2024-06-03 07:33:03+00:00): Hallo AnimeFan1997, 
Danke für Deine Mitarbeit bei OSM. *Über den review_request bin ich auf diesen Änderungssatz aufmerksam geworden und verstehe gar nichts. Zum Beispiel hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288027888 ist eine Sprunggrube und die dient auch für Quadball? In keiner Änderung habe ich einen Quadball/Quidditch Sportverein, wie in dem Änderungskommentar vermerkt, gefunden. Für eine Erläuterung wäre ich dankbar.
Gruß
Michael
AnimeFan1997 (2024-06-03 14:54:56+00:00): Ja. Als ich auf den Sportgeländen die Teams hinzugefügt habe hatte ich für alles den selben Kommentar gehabt. beim erlediegen. wollte es schnell abspeichern. und hatte nur einen Kurzen Kommentar gemacht.
mcliquid (2024-05-30 13:26:21+00:00): Hello again,

why is the Aida elephant no longer an artwork? ‘tourism=attraction’ is used for general tourist attractions that do not receive more precise tagging. Since the elephant is fenced in on private property, I would rather suggest leaving it at ‘tourism=artwork’.

The modified section of road should also be given a general ‘vehicle=no’ for traffic signs DE:250. This can also be seen in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:traffic%20sign=DE:250

Will you look at this again?
FliWaTüt (2024-05-30 16:11:38+00:00): The elephant is now BOTH = a general tourism attraction + in detail an artwork. This way it will be listed in more applications.
FliWaTüt (2024-05-30 16:16:49+00:00): DE:250 can be tagged as vehicle=no, listing vehicles and devices or horses in single sections with =no, will however implicate and result in the same effect, e.g. that dismounting from a bicycle and using this track is allowed.

All ways are leading towards Rome.
mcliquid (2024-05-30 16:39:09+00:00): In OSM it is not both after your change. It is now ‘only’ an attraction and no longer a work of art. I would always favour the more specific tag.

Regarding ‘bicycle=dismount’: Is there an additional sign with the German text ‘Radfahrer absteigen’?
FliWaTüt (2024-05-30 17:05:10+00:00): You are right (I am sorry), this is the first combination in OSM that does NOT accept an "double"-indication in a category = the system only accepts ONE (1) tag-info in the category "tourism", so I have changed it back to your indication.
FliWaTüt (2024-05-30 17:07:53+00:00): No, there is no additional sign "Radfahrer absteigen", but, sign DE250 implies such an action as "necessary" for bicyclists on this track in order to use it, so this is not wrong.
eggie (2024-05-30 13:14:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-30 15:39:41+00:00): Hi tanyeee, welcome to OSM.

May we know the source of your mapping activities?

Thanks.
tanyeee (2024-05-30 22:50:36+00:00): This is a information board of the park that I took.
https://i.imgur.com/I39fQ8E.jpeg
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 06:01:40+00:00): Ah ok, thanks for your answer!
Nexinor (2024-05-30 13:18:15+00:00): Je pense qu'il y a un problème 
I think there is an issue