piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2024-03-05 16:49:12+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148256384
Frans S (2024-03-08 14:27:16+00:00): Hello. We informed you on a few changeset about your poor mappings. 
They are still not improved.
All buildings will be removed and need to be mapped again.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148256434
Frans S (2024-03-05 16:52:18+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, you tend to oversize your mappings. Stay within the rooflines.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148256442
felipeeugenio (2024-03-06 11:51:59+00:00): Hola Sergio
Tienes razón, no clasifican como parques, pero son =grass.
Además por favor no pegarlos a las calles. Yo lo corrijo. Saludos
felipeeugenio (2024-03-06 12:13:42+00:00): Una duda Sergio

En Talca está la avenida 9 oriente, pero en un segmento se llama Inés de suares. En todas las bases de datos se llama 9 oriente. Cambiaron el nombre?

por favor no toques nada en talca, que tengo todo abierto.
saludos
CurlingMan13 (2024-06-06 20:13:08+00:00): Is the bridge one-way only northbound?
flyingember (2024-06-06 20:29:22+00:00): Yes, and I’ve driven over it a bunch of times.
CurlingMan13 (2024-06-06 20:39:21+00:00): Ok.  Cool.  Just wanted to make sure it was all only one-way and not like 1 lane each way.  :)

Happy mapping.
Frans S (2024-03-05 16:38:38+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.
Sometimes oversized mapped.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148256563
Frans S (2024-03-05 16:15:26+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Objects, without shadows next to it are mostly no buildings. Here it is just a piece of farmland.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148256716
ALu68 (2024-03-06 19:52:58+00:00): Hallo gokulgpn

Was hast du bei Mapillary gesehen?

Der Edel Grill befindet sich in dem Gebäude mit der gleichen Hausnummer 32:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10278670568/history

Und warum steht der "waste_basket" mitten auf der Straße?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11572474563

Gruß.
Frans S (2024-03-05 16:55:24+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Some buildings Inaccurate mapped.
Some Buildings not squared.
Connected nodes to other  buildings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148256753
Frans S (2024-03-05 17:11:47+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings oversize mapped
Buildings not squared


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148256792
Frans S (2024-03-05 17:14:08+00:00): Check this webpage to see the adjustments made on your mappings
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148260068
who_i_am (2024-03-05 15:48:27+00:00): 编号
Frans S (2024-03-05 16:48:05+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
You tend to oversize the mappings. Please be more accurate.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148256846
Frans S (2024-03-05 16:08:18+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
you have mapped objects, without shadows, indicating an opbject on the ground like a building. Here they are most likely agricultural crops on mounds.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148256958
Henry572 (2024-03-06 10:27:57+00:00): Hi MiSc20p,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your correction of the speed limit.
No problem, mistakes happen and I can undo the changes you didnt't want to save.
When you accidentally move a point in the editor, you can click the undo button in the upper right.
Happy Mapping!
Hendrik
Frans S (2024-03-05 16:13:44+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
This is not a building. Just a piece of agricultar land. You do see no shadow, what mean that the object is above ground level>
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148257376
Patchanka (2024-03-06 11:07:38+00:00): bonjour

je ne comprends pas ces modifications. Essayez-vous d'indiquer qu'il s'agit d'une voie verte ?
Si oui les tags sont les suivants :
highway=path 
foot=designated bicycle=designated traffic_sign=FR:C115	

Là vous avez modifié des trucs, supprimé les tags fixme mais sans faire les corrections, remplacé des "designated " par "yes", supprimé des tags qui n'ont rien à voir (railway)... 
Est-ce volontaire ??
Peut-être que l'éditeur ID vous induit en erreur, il est possible qu'il ne transcrive pas la bonne manière de cartographier ces équipements.

Je suis passée sur place il y a quelques jours et fait des photos disponibles dans Panoramax. On y voit les panneaux C115 de voie verte.

Quoi qu'il en soit cela fait plusieurs fois que moi ou d'autres contributeurs vous contactent à ce sujet, sans aucune réponse de votre part.

Je vais annuler ces changements car il ne correspondent pas au terrain et suppriment des tags qui n'avaient pas lieu d'être supprimés.
Túllio (2024-03-07 03:27:43+00:00): Não utilizar de nome da fazenda para nome de landuse=farmland ou semelhante. o nome da fazenda não representa o nome de uma parte. esse nome da fazenda pode ser colocado em notas
GanderPL (2024-06-27 19:14:27+00:00): Mimo iż można użyć https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=swimming_pool dla punktu, to ładniej się renderuje obszar. Od razu widać, że to basen. Nie musisz tego zmieniać, ale rozważ aktualizację
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148257797
MxxCon (2024-03-07 04:19:44+00:00): trash can in the middle of 1st avenue?🤨
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148258466
John Gilmore (2024-03-07 19:20:44+00:00): The trash can is on the sidewalk immediately next to 1st Avenue.  In the OSM.org and the EveryDoor renderings of the avenue and the sidewalk, there is a big gap between the two.  The trash can is placed immediately outside the edge of "1st Avenue" as drawn by EveryDoor.  Is there a rendering problem?  Or a conceptual problem on my part?  (Note: I am updating maps with no aerial imagery overlay, just doing local surveying.)
MxxCon (2024-03-07 19:26:46+00:00): In EveryDoor if you'll go into settings, Presentation section, Background Imagery and make sure that Bing at the very bottom is turned on. Then on the main screen bottom right button allows you switching between map and satellite view.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-05 16:40:15+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11694529833

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bhietsch (2024-03-08 19:36:12+00:00): Hey scetron, this actually isn't the best practice to be adding landuse tags to park boundaries in order to make it render nicely. This is called "mapping for the renderer", and it's generally discouraged because it may conflict with true data. There's several portions of this state park that includes sections of the Hudson River, which most certainly are not wooded areas. Because of this, I'm going to remove the tag.

Fahnstock Park may look like it has a natural=wood tag on it, but it actually has a separate feature that was drawn overtop of it with the natural=wood tag. This also isn't the best practice because it makes it hard to edit in the future if park boundaries change or sections of forest are clear cut or burned. I would recommend you use Storm King State Park or Black Rock Forest nearby as examples of some of the work I did to add landuse data without conflicting with park boundaries. Happy mapping!
bhietsch (2024-03-08 19:40:38+00:00): P.S. I used to make the same mistake several years ago... I was frustrated by it at first, but it began to make sense after I started importing state park boundaries myself.
scetron (2024-03-12 13:14:41+00:00): Excellent. Thank you for the comments, I was trying to find the proper way, and what I did felt like a kludge but better than it was. I will take a deeper dive and improve this section a bit. 

I ran into exactly what you described and had trouble finding the exact right feature to edit to place the tags on.
rskedgell (2024-03-06 06:36:57+00:00): Please could you explain what your are trying to achieve here? Adding only name=강남쩜오 to a node where two roads intersect is unlikely do anything useful.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-05 17:10:54+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11694579710
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11694579711

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180019905

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-03-05 17:44:08+00:00): Poprawione.
TrickyFoxy (2024-03-05 17:05:22+00:00): Рядом уже отмечена
Xvtn (2024-03-06 16:16:47+00:00): Great addition. Thanks!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-06 07:15:12+00:00): Hello!

Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree".

So for buildings it is not needed to put building as their name.

Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1257909324 is specifically named with such name?

And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
    
Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.
CjMalone (2024-03-05 19:40:20+00:00): We use international phone number formats (+44) otherwise looks good. Thank you.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-05 17:30:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Księdza Skorupki":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11694627329
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11694627330

"Okrzei":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11694627358
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11694627359

"Spacerowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11694627399

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-03-05 17:48:34+00:00): Popawione.
aceman444 (2024-03-24 22:46:34+00:00): Dakujem za vratenie do povodneho stavu.
luky89 (2024-03-25 05:47:49+00:00): niet zač
eggie (2024-03-05 21:03:17+00:00): Dag hihi....

Kijk nog even naar de foutmelding svp.

warnings:crossing_ways:railway-railway
  	1
Altijd een verbindingsnode maken.
verder heb ik de place=neighbourhood losgemaakt van de rails.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148261434

Nog een tip Svp niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dit levert vaak schade op. Doe dan in een  klein gebied een upload .. dan uit de editmodus en ga dan naar een volgend project.


MVG
eggie
marczoutendijk (2024-04-13 18:11:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15947
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-14 02:37:35+00:00): Reverted by DWG - undiscussed OEG Import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163594480
Frans S (2024-03-06 16:38:40+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Your mappings are too simple. just a rectangular 4 nodes, even when a building has extensions or corners. Follow the rooflines more accurate.
In general, your mappings are fine, except for the above-mentioned subject.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148261727
richlv (2024-03-06 13:56:21+00:00): Sveiki, te pievienots lielveikala punkts, bet mājaslapā neizskatās, ka tas būtu lielveikals - kas īsti fiziski atrodas šajā vietā?
PickAqua (2024-03-06 15:21:06+00:00): Sveiki! 
Šeit ir ūdens veikals. Šeit jūs varat iegādāties dažādus ūdens produktus veselībai un sportam. Mēs arī pasniedzam ūdens someljē kursus. Ir arī mobilā ūdens aplikācija.
richlv (2024-03-06 15:35:10+00:00): Liels paldies par atbildi, nomainīju uz shop=water, nedaudz pielaboju adresi.
PickAqua (2024-03-06 15:41:10+00:00): Paldies jums!
Frans S (2024-03-06 16:43:07+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
1 note. do not connect nodes of a building to other buildings or features.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148261889
Vas111 (2024-03-10 23:28:44+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1257920978
This should be area:highway=footway, not area=yes + highway=pedestrian
justb (2024-03-05 18:30:25+00:00): Die gate is er nog niet, MTB pad loopt dood, vandaag daar geweest, maar zal kwestie van tijd zijn.
Geim (2024-03-05 18:44:45+00:00): Ik heb een fixme op het hek gezet en de beheerder van MTB routes (waar ik de GPX van gekregen heb) gevraagd of hij contact op wil nemen met MTB Otterlo om te peilen wat de acties zijn.
De route laat ik eerst zoals het is. Mensen kijken toch op MTB routes.nl en bijna niet naar OSM.
mapperue (2024-03-06 09:35:51+00:00): Hi,
you add to this object:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1257922225
tag industrial=Salzlager Pluwig.
It would be preferable to use a tag that is already documented on OSM Wiki here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:industrial.
Maybe industrial=warehouse.
osm_Ralef (2024-03-06 18:37:32+00:00): Hi mapperue,
indeed that was a mistake. Thanks for the report. I will fix this.
VictorIE (2026-03-19 17:43:06+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1257923809

Could you check the ref:IE:smr ? :D

:giggle:
craghead (2026-03-22 18:01:56+00:00): Hi. Don't ever remember posting this! And I can't say I have ever been there?
VictorIE (2026-03-22 20:43:33+00:00): Fixed.
5R-MFT (2024-03-10 23:41:16+00:00): Hallo,
warum hast den Link mit dem Bild von dem Spielplatz gelöscht?
Grüße 
5R-MFT
Protoxenus (2024-03-11 08:19:30+00:00): Dafür gibt es zwei Gründe:
- Ich finde es sinnlos, in eine Geodatenbank Bilder zu verlinken. OSM hat sich das Ziel gestellt, eine aktuelle Karte und das dazu gehörende Routing zu ermöglichen. Als Quelle in den Änderungssatz kann es OK sein, wenn man au dem Bild noch andere Informationen entnehmen kann, aber nicht in dem Datensatz.
- Imgur ist eine kommerzielle Datenbank und deswegen haben links dahin in dem freien, von der Community getragenen Projekt OSM nichts zu suchen. Wenn der Laden morgen schließt oder der Betreiber Geld haben möchte, ist der link wertlos.
Gruß Protoxenus
5R-MFT (2024-03-11 08:34:59+00:00): Ahh wenn du es sinnlos findest, dann kann man auch die ganzen Links zu Wikimedia löschen

Wenn Imgur morgenn dicht macht sind die Bilder die über Mapcomplete.org hochgeladen wurden dort auch gesichert. Zumindest monatlich werden die Bilder gesichert.

 Für mich kein Gründe keine Bilder hochzu laden.
Protoxenus (2024-03-11 08:44:00+00:00): Ja, ich finde die links zu Bildern in Wikimedia auch sinnlos, weil sich die fotografierten Dinge verändern und die Bilder dann nicht mehr aktuell sind.
Ob die Bilder bei Imgur gesichert werden oder nicht, ist völlig irrelevant. Es ist und bleibt ein kommerzieller Anbieter. Die links zu MapComplete landen nicht im Datensatz.
Gruß Protoxenus
5R-MFT (2024-03-11 08:52:25+00:00): Dann lade keine Bilder hoch, fertig oder willst jetzt die Wikimedia  Links auch löschen. Werde dann die 1500+ Bilder mit der Zeit zu Wikimedia hochladen. Muss mal schauen ob es die Kategorie öffentliche Toiletten  schon gibt. Habe da ziemlich viele. Genauso wie Radwegweiser, Fahrrad-Reparaturstation und Fahrradparkplätze.
BCNorwich (2024-03-06 08:03:51+00:00): Hello,
As you can see from the warnings above you are duplicating highways which then disrupts routing. Please do not place a highway on top of an existing highway.

If an existing highway needs amending/correcting it is OSM good practice to amend/correct the existing highway. Not to place a second highway on top of an existing one.

I've removed the duplicates that I can see. Please now make your corrections to the existing ways. This will keep all the history intact.

Regards Bernard.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-06 05:21:07+00:00): Hello!

Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree".

So for buildings it is not needed to put house as their name.

Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1257931567 is specifically named with such name?

And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
    
Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-06 05:22:47+00:00): Also, ideally geometries would be improved a bit! This buildings have a bit different shape.

Also, if building is forming a rectangle in reality: you can select a line and press q to make it more regular.
ivanbranco (2024-03-06 00:39:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148271923
Nakaner (2024-03-06 09:08:02+00:00): Hallo,

vielen Dank fürs Löschen. Wir erfassen in OSM nämlich nur ortsfeste Points of Interest.

Viele Grüße

Michael