piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-01-14 22:04:32+00:00): I'm not really sure what exactly are you referring to and what roads you speak of. 

I've changed back road types on one of your changeset since you've changed them incorrectly. If you are referring to this, then highway=track is for LAND access roads, while roads leading to houses be at least highway=service. Refer to the wiki for more information. 

If you are referring to something else, I have no idea what are you talking about.

BTW, history in OSM is not erased, you can check it out if you want to find out who this someone is and ask a question.
rahwakunstnik (2024-01-15 14:45:22+00:00): One example is: "Mäe - Võru-Valga maanteele" and "Vissel, Sabbal - Võru-Valga maanteele", these are wrong names (I live in this area and I know more or less some of them, but not such names. True, Vissel and Sabbal live there. But no one names these roads on the Võru-Valga maanteele).
"Mäe - Võru-Valga maanteele (166736405)", the last change was made by me, the type of road surface, but this name is wrong, but I can't find who named it in the history.
Minor road should be one grade lower than Tertiary road, or am I wrong? Many programs do not allow easy navigation to the destination if the path is, for example, Track/land access road or path.
highway=track , what exactly was the change you reverted? Let me know and I can tell you more.
If you look at Estonian Basemap, Eomaps, Regio, Yandex Maps, Garmin or something else, the farm roads are not 1:1 of the same type, so I have based on aerial photos or what I saw with my own eyes.
Yes.. I'm sorry for getting upset, you can always comment and change, I'll answer in a friendly way! :)
dgmapping (2024-01-15 16:53:33+00:00): Use tools like OSM Deep History to see who and when changed this particular way:
https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/166736405
mp747474 (2024-01-06 15:47:26+00:00): Hallo, für Kindergärten aller Art haben wir eigentlich das standardisierte amenity=kindergarten. Wie kommt amenity=social_facility für einen Kindergarten zustande? Ein Kindergarten ist keine Hilfseinrichtung wie etwa ein Pflege- oder Behindertenwohnheim...
PStieler (2024-01-15 13:23:00+00:00): Die Flächenspezifikation war bereits vor mir vorhanden. Mit der Änderung ist nur der Zugang und die Fläche des Spielplatzes angepasst worden.
eggie (2024-01-06 17:49:36+00:00): Welkom bij OSM

Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. De format van phone aangepast naar +31...
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-06 17:51:04+00:00): websiteformat aangepast naar https://www.duikresortsubocean.nl
kitsee (2024-09-09 15:39:44+00:00): Hi Krd,
Unfortunately findmystreet uses copyrighted OS data and is incompatible with OSM.
kitsee (2024-09-09 15:42:08+00:00): reverted due to use of findmystreet.co.uk that uses OS data

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156400898
NeisBot (2024-01-07 00:18:34+00:00): Hi borzoi_gun 👋

your recent changeset has been marked due to a temporary or permanent block from further map edits. 

If you have any questions or if there's anything you'd like to discuss regarding the mapping, feel free to reach out! We're here to help. 

Best regards, 🤖

Details https://osm.org/user_blocks/15553
#ContributorHasBeenBlocked
moftasa (2025-09-22 11:15:47+00:00): It is incorrect to use the alpine_hut tag here. According to the wiki:

An alpine hut is a remote building located in the mountains intended to provide board and lodging. It is managed during the opening period. Typically, an alpine hut belongs to and is operated by an alpine club or a similar organisation.

Required properties :

- Remote building found in mountains (not only the Alps)
- The access is usually restricted to foot, mountain bike or ski.
- You will find food, shelter and sleeping places
- Permanent human presence during the opening period from staff to provide services, if no staff use tourism=wilderness_hut, if private hut for rent use tourism=chalet
- Reservation might be possible / required / recommended
- Optional owner access through restricted tracks might still be possible, also access by cablelift or helicopter.

osm.wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dalpine_hut

---
غير صحيح استخدام "كوخ جبال الألب" هنا. وفقًا للويكي:

كوخ جبال الألب هو مبنى منعزل يقع في الجبال، مُخصص لتوفير الطعام والسكن. يُدار خلال فترة الافتتاح. عادةً ما يكون كوخ جبال الألب تابعًا لنادي جبال الألب أو منظمة مماثلة، ويتم تشغيله من قِبله.

الخصائص المطلوبة:

- مبنى منعزل يقع في الجبال (ليس فقط جبال الألب)
- يقتصر الوصول إليه عادةً على المشي أو ركوب الدراجات الجبلية أو التزلج.
- ستجد الطعام والمأوى وأماكن النوم.
- تواجد دائم للموظفين خلال فترة الافتتاح لتقديم الخدمات. في حال عدم وجود موظفين، استخدم "سياحة=كوخ_برية"، وفي حال وجود كوخ خاص للإيجار، استخدم "سياحة=شاليه".
- قد يكون الحجز مُمكنًا/مطلوبًا/مُوصى به.
- قد يكون الوصول الاختياري للمالك عبر مسارات مُقيدة ممكنًا، وكذلك الوصول بواسطة التلفريك أو المروحية.

osm.wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dalpine_hut
bike'n'hike (2024-01-06 16:09:58+00:00): Bus stops here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9325460642

Not here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7229453647 (only Stadtbus Kolbermoor stops at this position)
marcoSt (2024-01-06 19:11:12+00:00): Nein, da irrst Du dich gerade, siehe https://efa.mvv-muenchen.de/ttb2/mvv_12429___H_s24_1.pdf.
bike'n'hike (2024-01-07 12:54:32+00:00): https://www.mvv-muenchen.de/fileadmin/mediapool/03-Plaene_Bahnhoefe/Minifahrplaene/VRE_2024_ST_RO/Bus429_M.pdf


still missing one stop
Syl (2024-01-07 09:03:59+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé la suppression du numéro. Je ne l'ai vu nul par ailleurs, il n'avais pas l'air d'être en double.
mcliquid (2024-01-07 10:22:56+00:00): Hi Jo, bist du sicher dass das "gravel" im Sinne der offiziellen Definition ist?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:surface%3Dgravel

Bei "gravel" geht man davon aus, dass die Steine größer als 3cm sind. Alles darunter ist "fine_gravel" wenn es lose ist und "compacted" (wie es zuvor war), wenn es festgedrückt ist.

Viele Grüße
Rennrad_Jo (2024-01-10 00:19:55+00:00): Hallo mcliquid,
Ok ganz so wie in der Definition von Gravel ist es tatsächlich nicht und es ist teilweise verdichtet aber es liegen recht große Steinbrocken auf dem verdichteten. Dann lassen wir es vielleicht wie es war.
Liebe Grüße Jo
okadatsuneo (2024-01-07 07:44:43+00:00): 03isさん、はじめまして。
被災地マッピングありがとうございます。
1点お願いですが、建物が長方形の場合、建物を描いた後にそのエリアを選択してショートカットで「q」を押して直交化をしてもらえるときれいな長方形になります。
お手数ですが、よろしくお願いします。
eggie (2024-01-06 18:56:27+00:00): Dag C Batenburg

bollard=fixed (cannot be (re)moved, rotated or lowered, not even with a key or tool)

    Do not use the values irremovable or unremovable, use bollard=fixed instead.

Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier=bollard
Ik pas het weer aan. 

MVG
eggie
MikiDi (2024-01-06 17:32:56+00:00): Dank voor je toevoeging! Indien je deze aanpassing maakte naar aanleiding van note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4055739 gelieve dan in het vervolg ook de note af te sluiten na aanpassing. Bedankt!
Syl (2024-01-06 18:02:47+00:00): Bonjour, il y avait déjà une laverie à quelques mètres : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11029738861
Est-ce que ça pourrait être la même mais mal positionnée ?
hms35 (2024-01-07 15:53:49+00:00): Bonjour, pour avoir visité le lieu et utilisé la laverie à plusieurs reprises, c'est bien l'emplacement en bordure de parking (là où je l'ai placée) qui est le bon. Désolé de ne pas avoir fait attention à l'autre point.
Syl (2024-01-07 17:51:55+00:00): Merci d'avoir corrigé, bonne soirée.
pio2_122 (2024-01-06 17:34:42+00:00): Przeniesienie usunięcie tagu building z tej relacji https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6163656 i dodanie go do https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1236059408 który stanowi część zewnętrzną w tej relacji spowodowało, że obrys budynku wyświetla się nieprawidłowo (brak wewnętrznej, pustej części wokół budynku).

Poza tym, wydaje mi się, że nie ma konieczności stosowania relacji   type=building dla grupowania części budynku (w tym przypadku https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16915054) - za osm-wiki: "Note that in many cases the added complexity of a relation is unnecessary--unless at least one part of a building is hanging over the building footprint, or the building has a complex structure with lots of parts, one can simply position building parts within a building outline as described in Simple 3D Buildings." https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:building
impiaaa (2024-01-06 19:23:12+00:00): To be clear, the tax assessor isn't an authoritative source on street names. That would be the org which named them, which would be the city's department of transportation.
Black_Diamond (2024-01-06 20:49:39+00:00): Well the sign on the street still says "Del" and the San Jose GIS website has both. Also all of the nearby addresses use "Del". The San Jose GIS data has it lower cased *and* title cased. At minimum, I'm going with what the street sign says, which I'm assuming the department of transportation installed at the corner.
impiaaa (2024-01-07 01:11:58+00:00): Yes, information from on the ground is always preferred, I just thought I'd point it out since you were referencing the tax assessor so often.
Black_Diamond (2024-01-07 18:36:26+00:00): I am using the tax assessor in some of my other changes to confirm that the street name is correct and that the addresses near a given street are wrong. The tax assessor is financially motivated in accurate addresses to send tax bills, and it's a public record. It's not perfect, but it's an additional data point.

It also helps with putting an address within a bounding box. It's also a good source of alternate street names that may not be consistently used on the street signs.

I use it as an additional data point to confirm that all of the data is consistent.  In this specific case, it's not as important as the street sign. There have been some interesting typos and confirmation of oddities found by using multiple data sources.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-20 19:20:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1237572207

to nie jest czasem część konstrukcji tunelu?
Frans S (2024-01-09 15:51:53+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, pay more attention to squaring of buildings.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145965287
Alt9800 (2024-06-08 13:37:30+00:00): Thanks for the advice! Please forgive me for the delay in replying.
I have confirmed that the groundwork has been cleaned up thanks to your and others' help to me!

After your suggestion, I have started to remember to rectangle with the Q key on many occasions.
In January 2024, another proficient mapper (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Hokkosha) doing crisis mapping gave similar advice (“Don't forget the Q key!”) ) to new mappers, and I suspect that the latest maps sourced from photogrammetry in the Noto Peninsula are now very easy for human eyes to see, even with machine discrimination for accessibility purposes.

Keep up the good work.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
mcliquid (2024-01-07 08:06:15+00:00): Hey there,

I have a cool tip for you: keep your changesets local.

Trust me, it will save you a lot of trouble and make your reviewers happy. Here’s what you need to do:

• stick to one area at a time (like a city, a district or a province)

• don’t cross the border (unless you have a passport)

• upload/save your changes before you hop to another place

Why? Because size matters when it comes to changesets. Don’t believe me? Check out this wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for listening, have a wonderful day and enjoy mapping!
koriaf (2024-01-20 13:42:25+00:00): Sorry, thank you. It looks like I've added these points from OrganicMaps but first time I wasn't logged in and then signed in to the OSM account after the second and it just sent them together.
Feel free to drop the changeset completely if causing too many problems
InsertUser (2024-01-31 17:18:52+00:00): Name and name:en don't seem to match on this. Is there a typo in one of them?
niartenyaw (2024-01-31 17:24:12+00:00): Oh yeah, it's definitely Pisces. I can't see all the tags on Organic Maps so I didn't know there was another name tag. I can submit a change to fix.
mat (2025-04-16 15:49:31+00:00): Bonjour, la route https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1176963558 est-elle toujours en construction ?
IgorMagellan (2024-01-17 11:34:03+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Разрешите узнать причину удаления почти всех LU=brownfield в пос.Магнитка и г.Куса Челябинской обл.?
Это специфическая территория, оставшаяся после разборки ветхого жилья, предназначенная для нового строительства, с фундаментами, кучей битого шифера и пр.мусора.  Сохраняющая адрес и пользующаяся у местных одним из ориентиров. И эта территория была оставлена на карте не зря. Вам чем она мешала?
Alexandr Ivanov (2024-01-20 12:24:57+00:00): Добрый день, если куча мусора имеет историческое значение и важна для Вас, то могу восстановить данные территории.
IgorMagellan (2024-01-20 22:34:27+00:00): Да, верните эти кучи мусора в Кусе и Магнитке
Alexandr Ivanov (2024-01-21 12:45:47+00:00): вернул
AntiCompositeNumber (2024-01-06 18:11:45+00:00): Correct comment and source:
Re-tag MBTA parking operator from Republic Parking to Keolis

Source: Bing; Microsoft Streetside; https://news.keolisna.com/keolis-expands-footprint-awarded-mbta-parking-contract
AntiCompositeNumber (2024-01-06 18:11:42+00:00): Correct comment and source:
Re-tag MBTA parking operator from Republic Parking to Keolis

Source: Bing; Microsoft Streetside; https://news.keolisna.com/keolis-expands-footprint-awarded-mbta-parking-contract
MikiDi (2024-01-06 18:12:23+00:00): *parking surface
NeisBot (2024-01-07 00:18:34+00:00): Hi Nsyuts 👋

your recent changeset has been marked due to a temporary or permanent block from further map edits. 

If you have any questions or if there's anything you'd like to discuss regarding the mapping, feel free to reach out! We're here to help. 

Best regards, 🤖

Details https://osm.org/user_blocks/15554
#ContributorHasBeenBlocked
MxxCon (2024-01-09 02:27:17+00:00): If this is setup just for xmas trees then that sounds as temporary/seasonal feature and shouldn't be mapped.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features
Even if it's not temporary feature, description= tag should be about THIS feature, not what they do at 83rd street...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145967080
IraGersh (2024-01-09 02:56:00+00:00): Its temporary.  I'll remove it tomorrow.
IraGersh (2024-01-09 03:15:35+00:00): I just removed it.  Also removed a toilet amenity at River Run Playground I added before realizing the whole building was tagged as a bathroom.
PhilNick (2025-04-16 11:46:58+00:00): Ta zonace NP Šumava nesedí. 
viz. https://drusop.nature.cz/mapa/drusop/?c=-786305.55%3A-1156701.95&z=4&lb=cuzk_ags_zm&ly=vzchu_z%2Cvzchu_op&lbo=0.8&lyo=
Hufkratzer (2024-01-06 23:27:04+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1237585347 sieht aus wie ein Reitplatz und nicht wie eine Reitanlage im Sinn von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding. Reitplätze werden in OSM normalerweise mit leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian getaggt und das kann man in JOSM mit dem Preset für sport=equestrian ("Pferdesport") machen.
welzheimerwald (2024-01-08 20:47:11+00:00): Danke! Ist angepasst.
MxxCon (2024-01-09 02:31:00+00:00): Please note that you can NOT take text for description from wikipedia. Their license is incompatible with OSM's license.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145967163
IraGersh (2024-01-09 03:14:09+00:00): I'm confused. Is the name ok though? Could I make that a loc_name?  Will change or remove the description tomorrow.
MxxCon (2024-01-09 03:18:41+00:00): If this is the name of this rock, then ya, that's fine.
IraGersh (2024-01-10 03:10:33+00:00): Thanks for fixing it.
puma515 (2024-01-06 20:02:08+00:00): Moin, 
Kannst du bitte deine Quelle für diesen Standort sagen weil auf der webseite vom RKISH gibt es diesen Standort noch nicht. https://www.rkish.de/unsere-wachen.html
und auch in der Lokalpresse konnte ich nix dazu finden. 

Schön gruß puma515
mcliquid (2024-01-07 08:05:21+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
karlrt (2024-01-07 09:22:09+00:00): Thx for the remark, I didn't know this poses problems. It was on the way, mapping with street complete and it did not upload until on WiFi again.
mcliquid (2024-01-07 09:36:47+00:00): I already thought so :) Not so bad with StreetComplete, as it's always the same changes, fortunately. But if it can be avoided, uploading more often would be great!
eggie (2024-08-15 19:35:26+00:00): Dag David
impassable betekent dat het niet zal routeren. Er is geen doorkomen aan. Is dat het geval? 
surface=asphalt  Daar kun je toch overheen lopen?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-08-15 19:38:51+00:00): Ik heb impassable omgezet naar bad.
Kijk een hier wat van toepassing zou zijn.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness
bicycle=no hoeft niet op een wandelpad. Het is default.
MVG
eggie
Eduard Laser (2024-01-06 18:45:46+00:00): Korrektur der Beschreibung: Pfad ergänzen. Schließt https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4055791.
NeisBot (2024-01-10 00:21:58+00:00): Hi DarkAustrian 👋

your recent changeset has been marked due to a temporary or permanent block from further map edits. 

If you have any questions or if there's anything you'd like to discuss regarding the mapping, feel free to reach out! We're here to help. 

Best regards, 🤖

Details https://osm.org/user_blocks/15564
#ContributorHasBeenBlocked
soerenwegenertc (2024-01-10 18:44:41+00:00): Hey Rallioz,

in den Name der Apotheke am Ring hast du "(geschlossen)" eingefügt. Für den Zustand geschlossen gibt es ein eigenes Tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:amenity

Ich habe den Namen daher wieder zurückgesetzt und die Schließung mit disused:amenity=pharmacy indiziert.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146114952

Schöne Grüße,
Sören
map_improver_xyz (2024-01-12 15:05:22+00:00): why was this relation deleted? I do not get an answer from mdich9
NieWnen (2024-06-22 12:43:15+00:00): Coś tutaj nie wyszło. O co dokładnie chodziło z noexit=yes?

Jeśli jest tam jakaś bariera, to powinien zostać użyty tag barrier, natomiast samo noexit niczego nie blokuje i daje się to na koniec linii, która z niczym się nie łączy.

Nie jest to również odzwierciedleniem polskiego znaku  d4-a
Michał_Bielawski (2024-06-23 19:02:53+00:00): Tak, tam są barierki, zasugerowałem się znaczkiem przedstawiającym barierki :D Zmieniłem na "barrier", mam nadzieję, że tym razem poprawnie. Jak coś, to widać to na mapillary.
NieWnen (2024-06-23 19:39:41+00:00): Tak, teraz jest poprawnie, dzięki!
LordGarySugar (2025-11-22 14:52:16+00:00): disabled=yes seems like a strange way to tag a nonexistant railway halt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1214318902)? Maybe historic:railway=halt? (if it should even be on OSM). Likewise the railway marked as abandoned despite no trace on aerial imagery?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-06 19:42:01+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11495394780
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11495394781

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
syntex (2025-07-03 23:19:54+00:00): Naprawione
canfe (2024-01-07 05:36:05+00:00): questo tratto non è layer -1; è sull'asfalto del posteggio lì mappato. O volevi indicare altro?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145969041
AwFi (2024-01-07 09:13:21+00:00): Volevo indicare che passa sotto al tetto dell'edificio dell'ex magazzino merci. Probabilmente però è meglio indicare il magazzino a layer 1 e i binari a layer 0
AwFi (2024-01-07 09:14:08+00:00): A breve provvederò a correggere
canfe (2024-01-07 13:07:22+00:00): Che precisione!! In effetti è proprio così.
Son affiancati perché una volta era a livello di scarico e carico.
Fare la banchina di carico rialzata con sopra l'edifico?
Ma davvero mappi con tale precisione tutte le ferrovie? Complimenti.
AwFi (2024-01-07 16:07:32+00:00): grazie del suggerimento, ci sto lavorando, non saprei solo come mappare la banchina, non trovo un tag adatto, suggerimenti?
Diciamo che ci provo a mappare con tale precisione, se posso aggiungo anche i segnali e tutto quello che si può aggiungere...però richiede un sacco di tempo, soprattutto in linee con infiniti PL.
canfe (2024-01-07 19:07:56+00:00): Non mappo stazioni, però potresti usare la query che trovi sulla wiki per platform e vedere dove sono. Oppure cercare su grandi stazioni dove sicuramente ce ne sono e vedere in media come vengono mappate.
Se poi, disperato, non trovi nulla ci sono gruppi, anche su telegram. Fammi sapere.
AwFi (2024-01-07 22:34:59+00:00): Trovato il tag giusto...loading_ramp. Ci è voluto un po' per trovarlo ma mi potrebbe essermi utile anche altrove
canfe (2024-01-08 05:43:49+00:00): Ma da taginfo è usato solo UNA volta!
AwFi (2024-01-08 06:31:07+00:00): Io ne vedo altri tra con e senza disused https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=railway%3Dloading_ramp+#tags
canfe (2024-01-08 06:39:51+00:00): Bravo! avevo cercato male io.
Guarda allora se riesci a chiudere la nota lì vicino https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3549193
AwFi (2024-01-08 06:50:30+00:00): Chiusa, purtroppo spesso non le guardo... dovrei controllare più spesso
mediarion (2024-01-06 20:15:23+00:00): I'm sorry for messing around here. I thought I could easily change or delete my addition.
hsc666 (2024-01-20 15:05:07+00:00): Sitzbank ist KEIN Eigenname. Bitte hör auf damit Beschreibungen als Name zu verwenden!
emersonveenstra (2024-01-08 21:07:11+00:00): Hi there,

Thanks for adding this! I would encourage you to add a tag to show what it is, since right now it is not usable by a majority of apps. Looks like it might be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dchalet and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Abuilding%3Ddetached

Also, images must have a valid license to be used in OSM, and I don't think zillow does, so could you please remove that? Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2024-01-25 13:01:09+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146672908
_klaas_ (2024-01-25 08:54:37+00:00): Hallo, warum hast du das UW Zapfendorf so eingetragen? Nach allem, was man auf Luftbildern erkennt und im Netz dazu lesen kann, ist das UW seit Jahrzehnten stillgelegt. Oder soll hier wieder was aufgebaut werden?
Viele Grüße
Klaas
bahnpirat (2024-01-26 12:14:41+00:00): An erster Stelle wollte ich den Ort für einen Wikipedia-Artikel ausfindig machen. Als ich ihn gefunden hatte, wollte ich den wahrscheinlichsten Grundstücksverlauf markieren, also mehr als nur einen Punkt in der Karte haben. Es ist eine relativ große Fläche, die von der Deutschen Bahn wieder genutzt werden könnte, wenn ein benachbartes UW nach Jahrzehnten (also "demnächst") baufällig wird.