piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-02-24 22:51:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/8551092944 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bar in Sheboygan Falls"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-05 05:33:14+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179378944
(No visible changes after review)
Marek-M (2026-02-25 09:42:50+00:00): Cześć, te nakazy skrętu w osm są niepotrzebne. Nakaz skrętu jest tutaj wymuszany jezdniami jednokierunkowymi. Wycofuję zbędne dane.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179027358
Strubbl (2026-02-25 16:59:00+00:00): Hi shelter_, danke für's Hinzufügen. Seit dieser Bearbeitung ist irgendwas mit der Nr. 45 komisch, sodass das gesamte Gebäude nicht mehr auf der Karte zu sehen ist, obwohl es in den Daten noch da ist. Sehr komisch. Vielleicht hast du eine Idee.
shelter_ (2026-02-25 18:12:35+00:00): Hi Strubbl, also es gab eine Node die einen Konflikt ausgelöst hat, das hab ich gelöst. Jetzt wird auf jeden Fall in der shortbread Karte das Gebäude auch gerendert.
Strubbl (2026-02-25 18:55:08+00:00): Danke, ja, jetzt ist es wieder da
NeisBot (2026-02-24 23:06:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13596714719 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cleaning services office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-05 05:33:16+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179378945
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 01:46:54+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and explicit source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184205188

https://osm.org/changeset/184205188
Aethonatic (2026-02-24 23:06:42+00:00): Oops, completely forgot about the edits I made in Hamilton. My bad.
muchichka_s (2026-07-06 20:45:15+00:00): I am reverting this change. The municipal boundaries have been mapped in accordance with the relevant legal act, which includes a map in its appendix. This has also been verified against cadastral parcels (unfortunately, access to the cadastre is currently unavailable).

https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/712-2020-%D1%80#Text
MappingMore (2026-02-27 05:39:17+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179113688
Omnific (2026-02-25 01:57:28+00:00): Please provide a source on this.
McCarte (2026-05-08 07:00:37+00:00): Why have you changed the entirety of the metro tunnel level/layer to -4 without considering the impact of these edits? The levels at each station are: -2 at Anzac, -4 Town Hall, -3 State Library, -2 Parkville & -2 Arden. The track levels need to match these levels for the DTP maps and journey planning to work.
LachlanTansey2009 (2026-05-08 08:34:08+00:00): I will fix this, I wasn't thinking of the impact.
McCarte (2026-05-12 06:38:51+00:00): I have made some further changes to levels/layers on the Metro Tunnel tracks to ensure our DTP systems have the correct data. Please refrain from making changes that could have adverse impacts on the public transport network. Thank you
gscholz (2026-02-26 09:05:20+00:00): Hi ChRogel,
this changeset has damaged the forest relation 9983417:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-4.10144&lat=48.01385&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9983417/history#map=17/48.013829/-4.102844

Can you please fix this?

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2026-03-04 07:30:01+00:00): Hi ChRogel, 
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
ChRogel (2026-03-04 20:31:23+00:00): Hi, Guido,
I tried to fix it with my usual editor, iD, but I didn’t succeed. An essay wiyth JOSM was hamprered by the instability of the zoom. I see a possibility by tracing a new East side and I will try it. Maybe, an opportunity for reviewing in depth. Thanks for surveying. Cheers, Christian.
ChRogel (2026-03-13 16:59:38+00:00): It is fixed now, and the other damage around Kerbieta, too. Are n’t they ?
gscholz (2026-03-14 05:53:14+00:00): Hi ChRogel, 
thanks for your feedback, seems to be OK now.
Guido
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-27 23:42:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8391974446
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1303043659

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bxl-forever (2026-02-25 00:34:53+00:00): Hello,

This is a large bounding box because in this edit you merely clicked on automatic "suggestions" in iD (fed by the name-suggestion-index) on various places, and also on long-distance railway relations.

Since you are an experienced user, I guess that you are already aware that the NSI contains a lot of controversial suggestions.  In particular for railway relations.  The history of most of those TGV relations contains back-and-forth edits where the operator gets changed into "SNCF", then reverted to "SNCF Voyageurs"… until the next iD user starts the edit cycle again.  I hope the French mapping community will soon settle how the operator of those relations should be tagged, to put an end to those endless edit wars.
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-02-25 01:12:37+00:00): Thông tin thêm: QL.32 đã được cắm mốc sang Đường tránh thị xã Nghĩa Lộ, không còn đi qua khu vực trung tâm nội thị của Nghĩa Lộ nữa
Omnific (2026-02-25 01:57:21+00:00): Please provide a source on this.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-27 10:37:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180495414 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping in USA
woodpeck (2026-02-25 08:27:37+00:00): Dear rip_notkods123, please provide better changeset comments than just "."! Also, consider using the "q" key in your map editor to help you make your buildings square if they are square in reality. 

You may also want to make sure the already-existing house numbers are moved to the building they belong to, rather than sitting in the middle of two buildings!
Baloo Uriza (2026-03-04 01:31:22+00:00): Is Holsey the entire street name or is there more to it?  Like Holsey Road?
Baloo Uriza (2026-03-04 01:31:24+00:00): Is Holsey the entire street name or is there more to it?  Like Holsey Road?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179013063
Jbokc (2026-03-04 01:45:52+00:00): It’s just “Holsey”.
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-02-25 01:03:25+00:00): Đoạn đường này được phía Sơn La xây dựng, để biết thêm thông tin hãy xem link này:
https://baosonla.vn/xa-hoi/day-nhanh-tien-do-thi-cong-tuyen-duong-tinh-112-PXvocTLVg.html
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-02-25 01:07:03+00:00): Xin nhắc lại: các bạn đừng chỉnh đường này thành Đường tỉnh 174 nhé, Đường tỉnh 174 chỉ giới hạn từ khu vực Nghĩa Lộ đến trung tâm xã Hạnh Phúc, tỉnh Lào Cai thôi. Xin cảm ơn các bạn đã đọc nhé!
Yunkers (2026-02-25 13:52:02+00:00): Hello.
Why have you updated the road? Have they put motorway signs somewhere there? Also, how did you manage to check that using Geoportal imagery?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-25 15:11:10+00:00): And there is plenty of things that can be remotely improved. (can give hints what if you want)

Tweaking high-end road categories is not really one of them.
Vinny's Workshop (2026-02-25 17:42:12+00:00): Please revert this changeset if you can. I don't exactly know what counts as a "motorway" in Poland, especially since I am from the U.S, where if a road has no grade-level intersections, it is considered a controlled access highway or a motorway. Also, even though a lot of American motorways are signed as "Interstate Highways," or simply interstates, not all controlled access highways in America are signed as interstates. Sometimes, motorways are stretched even further beyond their definition, search up the motorway "GA 400" and look where it turns into a trunk road. The very end doesn't even have proper interchanges, but no grade level roads cross the median, so it's a motorway I guess.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-25 19:16:40+00:00): > I don't exactly know what counts as a "motorway" in Poland

then please, do not change roads to highway=motorway in Poland
felipeeugenio (2026-02-25 12:38:09+00:00): Hola. una ciclovía es por defecto bycicle=designates. en este link están todas las combinaciones. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle). Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179014927
felipeeugenio (2026-02-25 12:40:25+00:00): Hay que tener ojo con las partes en que las ciclovías son solo para bicicletas y cuando admiten peatones. Usted conoce mejor el sector que yo, pero a simple vista se notan partes en que las vías peatonales quedan cortadas por ciclovías solo para bicicletas, donde es obvio que se puede caminar.
Estoy viendo con otros maperos como resolver la ciclovia temuco - labranza, que aparece solo para bicicletas, cuando tiene tramos peatonales también. Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179014927
NeisBot (2026-02-25 02:33:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 14 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/160545829 v11 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1386065251 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1386065254 v2 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/12833185096 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179014992
ralley (2026-02-25 17:51:50+00:00): Additiomnally these outlines are close to but not quite square whereas most buildings in NZ have largely 90 degree corners.  Please use the Square option (short cut S) in the ID editor
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179014992
ralley (2026-02-25 17:51:51+00:00): Additiomnally these outlines are close to but not quite square whereas most buildings in NZ have largely 90 degree corners.  Please use the Square option (short cut S) in the ID editor
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179014992
ralley (2026-02-25 17:53:35+00:00): Additionally these outlines are close to but not quite square whereas most buildings in NZ have largely 90 degree corners.  Please use the Square option (short cut S) in the ID editor
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179014992
micheleOSM3 (2026-02-27 20:31:21+00:00): Per favore stai attento alle relations: le rompi spesso.
alessandrocarmeli (2026-02-28 17:23:28+00:00): Dov’è il problema? 🧐
micheleOSM3 (2026-02-28 18:08:00+00:00): Dopo il tuo intervento, la relation 2638882 era rotta, ho dovuto aggiungere la way 1482733696, vedi la history:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xjk4ura5nA8oW5vNN40HMLTTKOgKkqhC&usp=drive_fs
felipeeugenio (2026-02-25 12:13:08+00:00): Hola. Hay restricciones de giro imposibles en esta edición. Está en el chat de la comunidad? necesitamos hablar de este cruce. Pero está obligando a los autos a meterse en contra del tráfico. O están mal puestos los oneway?

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179015477
felipeeugenio (2026-02-25 12:15:50+00:00): Ahí pillé una foto en internet y lo arreglé.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179015477
democat (2026-03-21 23:32:15+00:00): This changeset moved the whole apartment complex way
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179015806
NeisBot (2026-02-25 03:46:11+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (3 changesets) shows that 1191 of your last 1194 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=16471580
eerib (2026-02-25 08:30:02+00:00): Hello NeisBot,

Some of deletions were correct and some were not. For the trails that actually have been decommissioned, destroyed, or may be faint I've instead marked them with the destroyed or abandoned lifecycle prefix. For trails that were improperly deleted I've restored the trail.

A helpful reference for trails in OpenStreetMap is:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

Cheers, eerib
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-25 08:34:15+00:00): Hi eerib,

thanks for your clean up w/ https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179023605

Best regards,
Pascal
jacobwhall (2026-02-26 21:58:41+00:00): Hi Helen Mei,

First of all, thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Welcome to our community!

I noticed that in this changeset, you created a "direction sign" with the following tags:

name=direction sign
place=hamlet

This actually indicated that their is a place (like a neighborhood, village, or town) at that location called "direction sign".

Based on the `name` tag you gave this node, I assume it's some type of wayfinding sign. I suggest we use the tag `information=guidepost`, here is the documentation on that tag:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:information%3Dguidepost

I have gone ahead and made this change already. You can see my changeset here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179105934

Please feel free to reach out, or reply here, if you wish to discuss this further. I suspect we could find even better tags for this sign!

Best,
Jacob
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 12:50:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179016433
Grass-snake (2026-02-25 05:47:29+00:00): Здравствуйте, спасибо за Ваш вклад в OSM. Немного поправил + удалил названия улиц "ул. Полевая" и "ул. Прощальная", которые не смог найти ни в одном открытом источнике. Если уверены, что они именно так называются, укажите источник, пожалуйста.
HAALAND_ (2026-02-27 03:07:27+00:00): Здравствуйте, локальный язык следует добавить в тег "name" (name:zh).
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 12:50:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180158194
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179017016
MappingMore (2026-02-28 09:13:56+00:00): Revert of 179017119
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 12:48:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180158103
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179017290
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 12:45:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check updates on your edits
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179017296
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 12:44:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180157965
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179017421
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 12:37:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my updates https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180157739
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179017490
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 05:20:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180139813
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179017509
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 05:15:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180139707
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179017667
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 05:16:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179017850
NeisBot (2026-02-25 05:00:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1218240059 v2 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/565100478 v5 | 5 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179017964
NeisReview (2026-03-05 05:33:19+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179162388
NeisBot (2026-02-25 05:03:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13597146021 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Medical spa"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-05 05:33:18+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179378948
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-28 03:22:09+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/845320801

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
dmjab13 (2026-02-26 21:44:11+00:00): please modify areas closer in proximity, so the bounding box does not affect the entire state
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 05:11:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). No name for land use. You need to make another shape for place.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179018484
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 05:07:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180139486
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179018574
gpstracks (2026-02-27 17:51:34+00:00): Please,
stop deleting names. Stop deleting data if you don't know what you are doing,
Please, ask for help.
Thank You.
gpstracks (2026-02-27 17:52:11+00:00): Please,
stop deleting names. Stop deleting data if you don't know what you are doing,
Please, ask for help.
Thank You.
pantufla (2026-03-24 03:52:26+00:00): Hola Estefanía. De qué se trata esta edición de ponerle Estefanía como nombre a todos estos elementos del mapa?
RSota (2026-02-26 05:58:43+00:00): Hi, the cycle path on the river and the path along South Wharf Drive don't exist due to current construction works. You can see this on the Esri World Imagery aerial view. I'll delete the paths added through the construction zone.
Palina Markina (2026-03-02 08:51:31+00:00): Hi, nilloc29!
We noticed your recent edit where you deleted the 'highway' tag for part of the trunk road, bridge via Okanogan River (way/189582550). Based on currently available open data in OSM — such as satellite imagery and street-level photos — the road still appears to be accessible to motor vehicles.
If there have been recent developments, it would be really helpful to include a note in the changeset comment for future reference.
Looking forward to hearing from you!
Best regards, Palina Markina
nilloc29 (2026-03-02 09:05:03+00:00): I am unsure what I may have accidentally deleted. I was fixing the border of the Colville Reservation in that area. It crossed the highway at the wrong location there. I remember the node being attached to the highway. What exactly was deleted?
Palina Markina (2026-03-03 08:25:20+00:00): Hello niloc29! 
Thank you for your reply and your work on correcting the Colville Reservation boundary. It looks like the edit may have accidentally removed the bridge over the Okanogan River (near this node n50213623), breaking the road and disrupting routing.

Could you please check this area and restore the bridge? If you need any help or have questions - feel free to reach out, I'll be happy to assist.

Best regards,
Palina Markina