piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-21 13:12:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186115273 where the changeset comment is: revert deletion of military base, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20964
Dawid2849 (2026-07-21 11:15:41+00:00): i Sanu
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-21 13:12:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186115273 where the changeset comment is: revert deletion of military base, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20964
aTarom (2026-07-22 18:58:46+00:00): Hola, quizás se ha movido este nodo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12425944650/history
accidentalmente?
no cuadra con la altura del IGN en la nueva posición, pero no estoy seguro

Saludos
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-22 07:23:30+00:00): Should be review by the local community.

I think something went wrong here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/191573322

For more details: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=186109787
eggie (2026-07-21 11:38:11+00:00): Er is discussie op het forum mbt dat overal emergency=yes toevoegen aan bv fietsoaden.
Je kunt ook de breedte taggen. Dan zou LiveNav kunnen bepalen of het routeerbaar is.
Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-07-21 11:45:32+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/emergency-yes-op-wegen/125607/139
eggie (2026-07-21 11:48:29+00:00): Wanneer je paaltjes gaat plaatsen op kruispunten voor wie welke weg geldt dat paaltje dan?
Resultaat... de routering op de hoofdrijbaan voor regulier verkeerd is geblokkeerd.
Ga in gedachten in een auto zitten en zie.. Je komt een paaltje tegen. Dat paaltje hoort op het fietspad en motor_vehicle=no is gewoon fout.
Ik heb het paaltje verplaatst.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-21 12:41:28+00:00): Je zou ook kunnen informeren bij LiveNav of emergency yes wel nodig is als er bv bollard=removable of foldable op staat.
kubahahaha (2026-07-21 15:04:17+00:00): Hej, w miejscowościach bez nazwanych ulic (tak jak Kupno) adresy powinny być wpisywane jako addr:place=Kupno, a nie addr:street=Kupno.
Już poprawiłem
eggie (2026-07-21 11:35:41+00:00): Hoi..
Svp geen motor_vehicle =no op paaltjes zetten. Dat geeft problemen met moped en mofa.
Dat zijn ook motorvoertuigen (in osm)
Auto s worden per default gestopt.
Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-07-21 11:44:22+00:00): Verwijderd
alpacaMaps (2026-07-21 15:17:19+00:00): Still not a real node.
BCNorwich (2026-07-21 13:33:51+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've noticed that you've mapped the Sealands Park site within the outline of Martin's Caravan Park. This doesn't seem quite correct: a caravan site within a caravan site. Could you please check this and amend where necessary?

Regards Bernard.
Darren6 (2026-07-21 13:58:19+00:00): Hi Bernard,

Unfortunately, I do not know the situation for Martin's Caravans. Please see the link below to see the justification for the change. Sealands Park appears to be independent.

https://api.laverleisure.co.uk/app/uploads/2020/10/Four-Seasons-Park-Plan.pdf

This is the first addition I have made and I would gladly welcome any advice for ensuring my changes follow site rules!

Best regards.
BCNorwich (2026-07-23 18:24:22+00:00): Hi, from what you say and the park plan and the fact that I can't find any online reference to Martin's Caravan Park,, I think it might be appropriate to map the areas as per the park plan. The overall outline would be Laver Leisure. Shall I do that?

Regards Bernard.
topolusitania (2026-07-21 15:57:28+00:00): Do not erase data!
If it is a mistake, correct it!
Alshowaiey (2026-07-22 16:44:12+00:00): ممكن معلومات اكثر عن هذا المكان
t_ja (2026-07-22 18:19:12+00:00): Ahoj,
je nezvyčajné pridať layer=1 na celú dĺžku cesty https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1199982426 bez toho, aby sa pridal aj tag bridge=yes, t.j. jednalo sa o nadjazd.
V tomto prípade bude asi layer=1 pridané omylom.
Možno bol zámer pridať lanes=1, čo ale tiež nesedí so skutočnosťou, nakoľko sa na tejto ceste v pohode obídu dve autá. V mestách sa síce vyskytuje situácia, že polovica šírky cesty slúži na oficiálne parkovanie, ale vtedy musí byť cesta jednosmerná, t.j. oneway=yes.
Predpokladám, že ani toto nebude ten prípad...
kubahahaha (2026-07-21 15:00:34+00:00): Cześć, poprawiłem trochę twoje zmiany - chodniki muszą być w którymś miejscu połączone z istniejącymi drogami, inaczej nie ma jak na nie wejść.
user_5359 (2026-07-23 10:59:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531516484 (one of two hundert forty four objects). What is the mean of the tag name_cicl = Ciclorrota Trentina
?
vlakos555 (2026-07-21 11:58:35+00:00): písanú majú na webe adresu Vyšehradská 16
Superadlen (2026-07-21 11:56:23+00:00): source : https://baridimap.poste.dz/
Superadlen (2026-07-21 12:17:28+00:00): يرجى تصحيح الموقع الدقيق ان كان فيه خطء
VLD0251 (2026-07-22 20:12:20+00:00): Hello, this import requires a quality review. the names are written in uppercase, "addr:street" often appears to contain the name of the post office or the locality instead of the street name, and some tags (opening hours, contacts, source) should be verified. please correct these points to follow OpenStreetMap best practices.
Thanks
norgis (2026-07-21 18:50:12+00:00): Til info; rundkjøringer skal ikke ha name=* med gatenavn iht. wiki, selv om en gate finnes på begge sider (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Norway/Highways). Kun dersom krysset i seg selv har et navn.
BCNorwich (2026-07-21 13:44:08+00:00): Hello, I see you've mapped the tourism caravan site New Beach Holiday Centre, within and almost identical to the existing residential trailer park named New Beach.

This doesn't look right. If the existing park needs correcting, then its tags should be corrected, not a new site drawn over it.

Could you please look at this problem? Need any help please ask.

Regards Bernard.
topolusitania (2026-07-21 15:57:06+00:00): Do not erase data!
If it is a mistake, correct it!
topolusitania (2026-07-21 15:56:27+00:00): Do not erase data!
If it is a mistake, correct it!
Glassman (2026-07-21 17:00:17+00:00): #TIP: Landuse is typically an area that a feature is located in. Buildings should not be tagged as landuse, instead the area around the building should be tagged.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186112205
Superadlen (2026-07-21 12:18:20+00:00): يرجى تصحيح الموقع الدقيق ان كان فيه خطء
VLD0251 (2026-07-21 19:49:18+00:00): Hi Superadlen,
This mass import contains inconsistencies in the name tags: name and name:ar values do not refer to the same object, and the capitalization does not follow OSM naming conventions. please review and correct the imported data.
Happy mapping !
pwbriggs (2026-07-27 06:21:21+00:00): Thanks. Is this the office location? If so, why is the position marked outside a building? Can you move the POI point to the accurate location?

Thanks again for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Alshowaiey (2026-07-22 16:49:11+00:00): please keep your edits local
this changeset spans multiple continents

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Robot8A (2026-07-22 20:28:15+00:00): Yes, sorry, the deletion I did at Amsterdam Airport did not upload as I had bad connectivity. It uploaded later with the next changes.
kubahahaha (2026-07-21 14:49:22+00:00): Cześć, ta budowa została już wznowiona?
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-22 07:19:41+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the added name real?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/842341579/history/2
rarad74 (2026-07-22 04:54:35+00:00): Salut, daca tot esti nou si te bagi la lucruri avansate, te rog sa adaugi toate tag-urile necesare. Trebuie adaugat pentru zona pedestriana subterana de la metrou ( sau orice alte obiecte subterane) si tagul layer cu o valoare negativa de la cel putin -2 in jos pentru a plasa obiectul sub nivelul strazilor. Am adaugat eu acum tag-ul. O zi buna.
eggie (2026-07-21 13:43:46+00:00): review_requested 	yes

Hoi,
Netjes allemaal!  Eén hoekje van de sloot heb ik vastgemaakt aan de rest van het water.
Zie je edits https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=186115111#19/52.74132/4.85481

Wellicht heb je hier nog iets aan.
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.74170,4.852910,18/?datastrip=20260628_SVNEO-01&sensorname=SuperView-NEO

Ik heb de landuse construction aangepast en de opgeleverde woningen in aanbouw van construction gehaald. 

Mapse,
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-21 13:12:12+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 186108680, 186109035, 186109221, 186109262.
MassCartog (2026-07-21 23:32:14+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. Wanted to let you know, If the feature exists on the ground, it is valid.

You might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Even decommissioned trails should not be removed until they no longer exist. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. 

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
eggie (2026-07-21 13:26:06+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. 
Het bedrijf stond in een relatie. Dat is voor andere doeleinden.
Ik heb deze verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
Gendis BV (2026-07-21 14:20:19+00:00): sorry bij voorbaat. (totaal hier geen verstand van) het bedrijf staat nu wel op jullie site?? schijnbaar kunnen we via jullie op tiktok komen. want tiktok vind nu alleen de oude bedrijven die hier zaten.  dank je wel
eggie (2026-07-21 14:41:02+00:00): Staat er op. Ctrl-f5 edn paar keer. Cache leegmaken.
Alle apps die osm gebruiken laten ook de bedrijven zien 
Wel moeten die eerst hun updates doorvoeren.
Gendis BV (2026-07-21 14:45:15+00:00): dank je wel
OneMoreSCAccount (2026-07-22 22:25:53+00:00): Яка користь від цього набору змін?

1. Прибрано тег sidewalk=separate. Він був правильний, бо на Андріївському узвозі є тротуари

2. Додано psv=yes. На Андріївському узвозі автобуси не їздять, тому це неправильно

3. Прибрано maxspeed=20. Він також був правильним згідно правил дорожнього руху

Перестаньте ходити за моїми наборами змін і робити "покращення"
KKS (2026-07-23 10:24:03+00:00): 1. який sidewalk якщо це пішохідна вулиця. Думайнє?
2. на Андріївському узвозі можна їздити тому у кого є перепустка. вт.ч автобусам. Думайнє?
3. Знак 20 як пруф.

Але ти чомусь забуваєш шо ти сам вліпив bicycle=private

Тому спочатку розберись в ситуації (привіт 12гекторний заказник з 44га), а потім вже починай мапить. А краще не мап взагалі - якшо не вмієш
OneMoreSCAccount (2026-07-23 10:52:03+00:00): 1. Там є тротуар, всім крім тебе це очевидно
2. Автобусами не можна, бо там немає затверджених маршрутів. Тому psv=yes там абсурдно
3. Знака немає, є ПДР, які встановлюють максимальну швидкість на дорогах з знаком "пішохідні зона"

Щодо 12 гектарів ми вже розібралися, що ти неправильно поміряв, не розумію до чого це

bicycle=private абсолютно правильно. В Україні для велосипедів ті самі обмеження в пішохідних зонах, що і для авто. Тобто без знаку не можна кататися транзитом. Хоча можливо є сенс послабити до bicycle=destination, але точно не bicycle=yes
balint36 (2026-07-23 18:27:14+00:00): Szia! Számos esetben egyes címkék nem kerültek át a régi oszlopról az újakra.
balint36 (2026-07-23 18:28:22+00:00): Illetve ekkora mennyiségben honnan származnak az elhelyezkedések és az ref-ek?
norgis (2026-07-21 14:00:00+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186048316
HellMap (2026-07-28 13:06:23+00:00): Sveiki,

Kā iepriekš jautāts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170500193 - vai varētu precizēt no kurienes / no kāda avota ir šis nosaukums angliski?
Emils Mikelsons (2026-07-28 16:09:02+00:00): Sveiki! Uz vietas var redzēt- tur ir kalnu nosaukums gan latviski, gan angliski.
HellMap (2026-07-28 16:21:04+00:00): Skaidrs, paldies par precizējumu. Vēlams nākotnē norādīt to izmaiņas komentārā vai avotos, piemēram "nosaukums no informācijas stenda" lai vēlāk šādas izmaiņas, kas nav atrodamas citos avotos, būtu saprotamākas.
WaffleR_zero (2026-07-29 06:26:07+00:00): Can you please make your comments specific and clear next time? Explain what you did here.
VLD0251 (2026-07-22 21:46:55+00:00): Hello, could you please clarify the origin of the name "منبع بني شيكى" and provide a reliable source confirming this name?
Happy mapping!
VLD0251 (2026-07-22 21:47:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3542126210
dfahed (2026-07-30 13:57:53+00:00): I just translated the name from french to arabic, I don't know the place and I assumed the person who added it first knows it.
VLD0251 (2026-07-30 22:05:21+00:00): In this case, it is preferable not to add a name based on an assumption. in OpenStreetMap, names should be verifiable and based on reliable sources or local knowledge. If there is any doubt, it is better to leave these tags empty until the name can be confirmed.
nerihv (2026-07-21 13:50:50+00:00): Tiene dos alertas del rio y del etiquetado como aldea. Favor revisar. Las edificaciones fueron mapeadas con Bing.
eginhard (2026-07-28 13:02:59+00:00): Please use proper changeset comments: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
mavl (2026-07-21 14:02:21+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 185953864, 185954150, 186046194, 186046222, 186046247, 186046328, 186046450, 186046590, 186046638, 186046654, 186046676, 186046700, 186046725, 186046756, 186046856, 186046881, 186046905, 186046927, 186046997, 186047080, 186047175, 186047191, 186047227, 186047309, 186047343, 186047389, 186047412, 186047740, 186048027, 186048104, 186048123, 186048151, 186048171, 186048217, 186048275, 186048314, 186048360, 186048400, 186048454, 186048511, 186048536, 186048586, 186048649, 186048789, 186048816, 186048834.
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-22 22:33:56+00:00): 👋 Не нужно подписывать дорогу как Грунтовка, это не название. То что это грунтовка понятно из тега highway=track.

Поправил.
JanezPavelZebovec (2026-07-28 20:56:40+00:00): Si prepričan, da je 112 številka tega hidranta in ne samo telefonska številka klica v sili?
Joško Horvat (2026-07-28 21:29:11+00:00): Pa, 112 so gasilci. To pa je gasilski hidrant
Syl (2026-07-26 09:16:57+00:00): Bonjour, je ne trouve aucune source qui confirme ce nom et vu l'endroit ça ne semble pas possible qu'il y ait un col ici.
Glassman (2026-07-22 00:16:29+00:00): #TIP: descriptive names are not used in OSM. I removed them and added a couple of gates.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186118896
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-22 07:17:15+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the added name real?
Basile22740 (2026-07-22 09:13:48+00:00): No, my error.  I've only just started submitting my GPS data and appear to have made a mistake.  The node has no name.  Apologies.
Basile22740 (2026-07-22 09:14:36+00:00): I'm not yet sure how to correct it.  I will have to re-read the guide again.
rajdhani (2026-07-23 06:46:02+00:00): Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186215907
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-21 18:27:59+00:00): As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality of your mapping and avoid consequences for your account and the features you map. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

I fixed the invalid phone=* format, used the correct website=* for the actual location and cleaned up name=* to be the name only https://osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only moving the branch name to branch=* for the POI in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186133105
KMD0051 (2026-07-21 18:32:16+00:00): Thanks, I'm very sorry! This is all new to me, apologies for the extra work. A reddit sent me here when I was trying to figure out why Uber/Lyft had the wrong business names. Appreciate your help.
KMD0051 (2026-07-21 18:35:20+00:00): [I just checked the other locations I edited so I could clean it up/you didn't have to do it, and I saw it was already done. Thank you and sorry for the extra work)
CAM-Gerlach (2026-07-21 21:10:46+00:00): No worries at all, sorry if I sounded too harsh (I deal with thousands of SEO mappers 99% of whom don't even bother responding at all)--thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap and I really appreciate your understanding and desire to improve! Overall your changes were pretty good for a brand new mapper, they just required some relatively small tweaks that's all. Thanks, and happy mapping!
KMD0051 (2026-07-21 21:15:43+00:00): Not harsh at all, I'm in your playground. Was happy to learn, thanks for the coaching and hope you have a great rest of the week!
CAM-Gerlach (2026-07-22 17:34:39+00:00): Awww, that's so kind of you--made my day! And not at all, it's yours now too. You have a great week too!
topolusitania (2026-07-21 15:56:05+00:00): Do not erase data!
If it is a mistake, correct it!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-21 18:30:07+00:00): As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality of your mapping and avoid consequences for your account and the features you map. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

I fixed the website=* to be the correct URL for the specific location, as it was before, and cleaned up name=* to be the name only https://osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only moving the branch name to branch=* for the POI in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186133247
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-21 18:34:02+00:00): As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality of your mapping and avoid consequences for your account and the features you map. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

I fixed the invalid phone=* format, used the correct website=* for the actual location and cleaned up name=* to be the name only https://osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only moving the branch name to branch=* for the POI in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186133478
StC (2026-07-22 13:54:58+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'itinéraires pédestres qui passent par là. Je vais essayer de m'occuper de la réparation.
silversurfer83 (2026-07-21 20:20:21+00:00): Hallo :)

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht.

Bei Baustellen gibt es im Allgemeinen zwei Möglichkeiten:

- Sie dauert voraussichtlich länger als 6 Monate? Dann einfach die passenden access=* Werte setzen. (kann zB vehicle=no sein, wenn Fußgänger weiter dort entlang können)

- sie ist in ein paar Wochen bis wenigen Monaten wieder weg? Dann access:conditional=* setzen.

Grundsätzlich ist es angebracht an die bearbeiteten Objekte ein note=* mit einer Erklärung zu taggen und in der Quellenangabe der Änderung am Besten einen Link zur PM vom Bauträger oder so.

access=restricted nutzen wir nicht mehr und woher CLC:explanation kommt würde ich gerne wissen :)

Grüße
silversurfer83
Warburg_Mobilität (2026-07-22 06:02:14+00:00): Hallo und danke für die Erläuterungen zu temporären Sperrungen! Ich denke, jetzt sollte alles richtig getagged sein
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-23 14:04:40+00:00): Driveways are not residential roads.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186120520
topolusitania (2026-07-21 15:55:22+00:00): Do not erase data!
If it is a mistake, correct it!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-21 18:32:02+00:00): As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality of your mapping and avoid consequences for your account and the features you map. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

I fixed the invalid phone=* format, used the correct website=* for the actual location and cleaned up name=* to be the name only https://osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only moving the branch name to branch=* for the POI in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186133356
topolusitania (2026-07-21 15:54:41+00:00): Do not erase data!
If it is a mistake, correct it!
topolusitania (2026-07-21 15:54:10+00:00): Do not erase data!
If it is a mistake, correct it!
felipeeugenio (2026-07-21 22:54:42+00:00): Se conservan caminos agregados, a los cuales se les corrige la precisión. Las casas son en su totalidad representaciones esquemáticas que no representan la estructura visible en la foto en ninguno de los casos.
Se le insiste al mapero, quien sigue son contestar ni hacerse cargo de los comentarios ni de la calidad de sus ediciones. Se eliminan todas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186120946
eggie (2026-07-21 15:12:15+00:00): Hi ,

A surfacetag is ofcourse okay, but please comment your edits.
Greetz,
eggie
BSoilFriendly (2026-07-28 13:57:06+00:00): Apparently I'm BSoilFriendly, I forgot all about that. And your message (from OpenStreetMap) got in my spam unfortunately, it's my outlook email address so I guess Microsoft knows all about it,

thanks for sharing, I'll edit my comments (if I didn't forget my username too). I suppose JOSM should request it as well should I leave it blank (again again).

Commenting is a good idea, I'll keep it concise.
BSoilFriendly (2026-07-28 13:57:44+00:00): Those edits timeframe was also highly suspicious.
BSoilFriendly (2026-07-28 13:58:14+00:00): Cheers.
eggie (2026-07-28 14:14:15+00:00): 👍
topolusitania (2026-07-21 15:53:35+00:00): Do not erase data!
If it is a mistake, correct it!
topolusitania (2026-07-21 15:53:01+00:00): Do not erase data!
If it is a mistake, correct it!
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-21 21:17:32+00:00): Please se https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20967
silversurfer83 (2026-07-21 20:41:35+00:00): Hi :)

just a little hint: when you add lifecycle prefixes it's best to add them to the desired tag that is already present. Here you left the amenity=cafe still tagged to the object (I cleaned that up). 

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186121831
rarad74 (2026-07-22 11:51:32+00:00): Buna din nou.
Nu exista valoare de tag "Urgency Category 1" pentru building:condition. Te rog nu mnai adauga tag-uri inexistente pe harta. openstreetmap nu suporta momentan si nu are tag dedicat pentru cladirile cu risc seismic.
toma_drag (2026-07-22 16:24:15+00:00): Salut - ai putea ajuta să propunem o astfel de valoare de tag? Ar fi o variantă și sub building:quake-resistant=Seismic grade E util să devină vizibile clădirile expertizate oficial, de pe lista AMCCRS.
ion_chi (2026-07-21 16:32:34+00:00): Hey Huong,
Thanks for your change. FYI, you can encode an expected (re)opening date in the opening_date tag. I've gone ahead and done so in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186126607
Huong Dang (2026-07-21 16:35:46+00:00): YAY thanks!