piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
landvogth (2025-05-12 21:14:49+00:00): Hallo rempshaener,

hab gefragt, also die Daten kommen von den jeweiligen Wasserversorgern.
Wir kennen die nicht, ham die nur über die jeweiligen Feuerwehrkommandanten durchgereicht bekommen.

Ich kann gern noch mal drüber schauen und schauen ob ich doppelte finde.

Viele Grüße,
Marcus
rempshaener (2025-05-13 15:29:57+00:00): Hallo,
dann beim nächsten mal am besten in das vorgesehene Feld schreiben.
Viele Grüße
Puxan (2025-05-12 09:46:29+00:00): Hola Ciutadella. Veig molts canvis a Ciutadella (masses potser per ser un neòfit) M'agradaria que m'expliquesis el nom d'Obelisc que has posat a l'església de St Francesc d'Assis i també per què dius que el seu nom és San Francisco si la seva denominació oficial és Sant Francesc.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166077427
Puxan (2025-05-12 09:52:38+00:00): Hola Ciutadella. Veig els canvis que has fet (potser masses per un mapejador novell) M'agradaria que m'expliquessis el per què de posar a l'esglesia de St Francesc el nom d'Obelisc i el canvi de nom de l'església a San Francisco quan el seu nom oficial és de St Francesc
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166077427
Bienson (2025-05-11 00:21:24+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166089985 -

Weg war korrekt eingetragen.
HantDX (2026-05-22 08:16:21+00:00): Откуда название микрорайона Заречье в Лунинце? На всех в том числе старых картах этот район именуется Залесье.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-10 17:10:50+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12824243050

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse (2025-07-04 18:20:22+00:00): Hello,
If https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/node/6013943584 has shut then I guess that the "healthcare" tag should be removed?
Best Regards,
Andy
literan (2025-05-11 13:19:37+00:00): вы тут все дороги переломали. Это вандализм, откат
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:53:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:56:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
Glassman (2025-05-12 00:07:51+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166078903
bxl-forever (2025-05-10 17:22:21+00:00): SVP ne pas ajouter des adresses en double, les adresses sont déjà sur la carte. Uniquement le point relevant pour Croix-Rouge avec les tags et nous pouvons lier avec une adresse existante.
user_5359 (2025-05-11 11:57:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You move the node https://www.osm.org/node/10785837753 more than hundred meter. Please check the correct position. If you need help: You are welcome!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-01 09:08:30+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993008294/history has roof = gabled that was added in this edit
Maybe roof:shape=gabled was intended here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof
Thorsten2219 (2025-06-01 12:11:56+00:00): Hi Mateusz.
Sure. I checked with overpass and fixed some more. Many thanks for your feedback!
-- 
In case I see and fix more (anywhere), can this be safely changed without making troubles?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-01 18:15:33+00:00): I think so (I am slowly preparing bot edit, this message was part of checking that noone is opposed)

though if someone gets to it before me I will be more than happy with it
Thorsten2219 (2025-06-02 10:31:36+00:00): I would prefer more automatic changes, also additions. I have already read a thread, where you discussed similar things .. a lot of work. Thanks for this.
Automatic change appreciated from my side.
Fraxi (2025-05-10 19:16:33+00:00): Thanks! When I was "on the ground", I was hesitating for the correct syntax.
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:55:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
Puxan (2025-05-12 10:37:36+00:00): Hola Ciutadella. Em podries explicar el motiu d'eliminar la relació del Cementiri de ciutadella i sustituir-la per una serie d'edificis independents que, des del meu punt de vista de mapejador no tenen cap sentit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166079683
Puxan (2025-05-12 11:24:41+00:00): En aquest set de canvis s'han esborrat edificis per tornar-los a mapejar. Hi ha alguna explicació que ho justifiqui?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166079683
Jordi MF (2025-05-12 22:32:13+00:00): Aquest compte té el mateix patró de comportament que el d'un usuari que ha estat desenes de vegades bloquejat per vandalisme: elimina nodes correctes per a tornar a dibuixar els edificis, cementeris, castells, etc. El seu nom d'usuari com a municipi (Ciutadella) segueix el mateix patró que ha tingut en els municipis de la Franja i en el País Valencià (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Albocacer).

Afegir etiquetes name:es no sempre és incorrecte, però aquest compte i "Albocacer" comparteixen aquest mateix comportament d'edició: usuaris nous que, a banda de l'explicat anteriorment, es centren en afegir etiquetes name:es (sense comprovar si realment és una traducció en ús).

Per tot açò, és fàcil de deduir que es tracta del mateix usuari saltant-se els bloquejos que ha rebut, la qual cosa incompleix els termes d'ús d'OSM i no té dret a mapejar mentre durin els bloquejos (els quals han arribat a ser de 10 anys).
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:53:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
quincylvania (2025-12-26 02:02:25+00:00): Thanks for condensing this!
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:54:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:53:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
Osmwithspace (2025-09-17 10:42:53+00:00): Are there really two vending machines?
ChrissW-R1 (2025-05-14 07:20:27+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/4754230
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-13 12:59:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12826217980/history has fixme:type = fix that was added in this edit
what should be fixed here? do you need help with selecting better tags?
MapleTrees (2025-06-13 15:51:00+00:00): Yeah I wasn't sure how to map it. It's a hair removal place. Most commonly eye brow threading but also other facial hair. I don't know if there's a category specifically for that or if it would be too be some more generic beauty category
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-19 10:03:48+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?search=hair%20removal finds https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:beauty

shop=beauty beauty=hair_removal ?
MapleTrees (2025-06-19 15:56:33+00:00): I've updated it with those tags. Does it look right now?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-23 22:40:08+00:00): yes, thanks!
paoso (2026-07-26 17:13:22+00:00): Hallo Michael_H,
du hast hier den Weg im Norden des Galgensees geändert (access:conditional). Bist du den Weg gegangen? Ich war vor ein paar Tagen am Galgensee, konnte aber trotz intensiver Suche den Zugang zur Brücke über den Truhenseegraben nicht finden.  Laut Luftbildern im BayernAtlas gibt's auch die Brücke nicht mehr. Ich würde deshalb den ganzen Weg (bis zum Goldsee) als abandoned markieren. Also: War der Weg 2025 noch begehbar?
Michael_H (2026-07-27 15:15:18+00:00): Da der Zugang zu der Zeit, als ich dort war, verboten war, bin ich nicht um den See gelaufen. Die Brücke über den Truhenseegraben gab es damals aber noch.
paoso (2026-07-28 08:01:26+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung. An der Brücke ist jetzt ein Vermerk -- paoso.
Jordi MF (2025-05-12 22:46:31+00:00): Quina és la font per a afegir entre parèntesi l'aclariment ("antic")? Pel que sembla, els documents oficials fan referència al Cementeri Municipal Vell (no antic) i al Cementeri Municipal Nou: https://www.ajciutadella.org/WebEditor/Pagines/file/Reglaments/ReglamentCementeris.pdf
RDreher (2025-05-12 19:58:24+00:00): Ok, so if was:name was not what I was supposed to use, why does it even exist then? It comes up when you start typing "was:" in the editor.
JessAk71 (2025-05-12 22:50:25+00:00): old_name is a more widely used tag for a previous name: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:old_name from the wiki was:name is sometimes used but broader community preference is to use old_name. was:name according to the discussion linked to the wiki also seems to not be picked up by Nominatim. Open to whatever notation you feel is best for the tag if you have a different preference as I dont think going one way or another is a big deal in this case.
RDreher (2025-05-13 00:50:26+00:00): Hmm, so I've looked at the wiki and the discussion you mentioned, and I see that this is an annoyingly complicated issue. It seems there are two main camps - the camp that says old_name is better and was:name has no place, vs. the camp that says these two tags mean different things. The case for the former camp seems to be that (A) old_name is more widespread already anyway, and (B) Nominatim doesn't pick up was:name diminishing its potential usefulness.

To the latter camp though, old_name is for when the current object changed names, but is still the same thing, while was:name is for when it changed into something different, not just changed names. If we were to adopt that style, then this building definitely should use was:name, not old_name, because it's not a Christian church anymore, it's a Guyanese Hindu temple.

What do you think about this though? It seems like you're more in the camp that says just always use old_name for stuff like this.
JessAk71 (2025-05-13 01:15:12+00:00): right agreed, can go either way in this case. In that light was:name seems more appropriate Ill go ahead and update that.
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:56:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
BCNorwich (2025-05-11 05:01:58+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The pub is already mapped, so I've included your new info in the pub building outline.

Regards Bernard
Facalderonm (2025-06-21 14:41:59+00:00): Hola Josue,

Según la guía para mapear en Colombia de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Colombia/Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear#Nombres_de_calles), los nombres de las calles son las nomeclaturas oficiales, no los nombres conmemorativos. Revierto sus cambios.
marczoutendijk (2025-05-10 19:16:36+00:00): "south" should be "east"
*Martin* (2025-05-13 20:21:07+00:00): Ahoj,

Ked pridavas foto na freemap, maz prosim `?width=1110` z URL. Vdaka.
vladosaro (2025-06-08 08:10:07+00:00): ahoj, si ma riadne zmiatol. Asi si chcel napísať, "ked pridávaš do OSM odkaz na foto vo Freemap, maž..." 
Dobre som pochopil?
*Martin* (2025-06-09 06:46:58+00:00): Myslim, ze namiesto image=https://backend.freemap.sk/gallery/pictures/657529/image?width=1110 dat image=https://backend.freemap.sk/gallery/pictures/657529/image
flohoff (2025-05-12 08:27:54+00:00): Moin,
wie lange ist denn hier die Vollsperrung geplant? 
Das hat schon signifikanten auswirkung auf das Routing und ich würde mir das gerne in die Wiedervorlage packen damit das nicht vergessen wird:

Hier eine der Routingänderungen - Rot alt - Grün neu.

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=660715,1039217#50.57839,6.96705,14z

Flo
flohoff (2025-05-12 08:28:21+00:00): Ach ja - und im Süd-Östlichen teil hast du access=permissive getagged? Was ist das? Also - wie ist das beschildert?
rescuefighter (2025-05-12 09:00:02+00:00): https://kreis-ahrweiler.de/vollsperrung-der-l-492-zwischen-todenfeld-und-hilberath/

Ca drei Monate. Die die Baustelle eingestellt
Langlaeufer (2025-05-12 08:16:31+00:00): Sofern das Gehen auf der Fahrbahn nicht explizit verboten ist sondern separate Gehwege vorhanden sind bitte foot=use_sidepath statt no verwenden.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166083595
Snoiprocs (2025-05-12 19:54:11+00:00): Danke für die Hilfe!
Frans S (2025-05-12 11:41:04+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.  The dense build areas are too difficult fore new inexperienced mappers. Select next time an easier project.

About mapping of high buildings.  They show a large shadow.
Difficult area to map.
Big building blocks with several stories and courtyards

Check here how high buildings ought to be mapped.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z7uDwYm4oNmlexHIhJxGCjPpNhCQAgRia5aEJr_4MwM/edit?usp=sharing

Many tall buildings have a small building, a superstructure, lift building or something similar on the roof. They give a shadow as well, so do not map them as a separate building, just map the roof lines of the complete building, and move the whole to the footprint. You can often see it in the shadow.

Best regards and keep mapping
archie (2025-05-10 20:31:18+00:00): Hej, välkommen till osm! Din edit ser bra ut. Förutsatt att det verkligen är en ingång till en grotta och inte resterna av en tidigare byggnad. 
Förresten namnet "Varggrottan", hur har du fått fram det? Om jag kommer till stället, kan jag då verifiera detta namn?
Olof Bjarnason (2025-05-10 20:41:15+00:00): Tack!

Jag fick nys om denna "grotta" genom denna sajt: https://detvildagoteborg.se/aventyrsguiden/grottor/varggrottan/

För att hitta dit idag googlade jag också, och hittade ett par ställen till som använde namnet. T.ex. denna https://www.aventyrligare.se/poi/varggrottan-2-8281/

Även en FB-tråd hittade jag tidigare idag, som gav mig ytterligare ledtrådar hur hitta dit.

Det tog nån timme att verkligen hitta grottan, så tänkte att detta skulle vara ett utmärkt tillfälle att underlätta för framtida "grottletare" - göra min första OSM edit!

(Dessutom finns en Varggrottan i Finland, som är betydligt större och omnämnd på Wikipedia, vilket gjorde googling lite svårare)

Jag tog ett par foton av den ena ingången.
archie (2025-05-10 20:50:34+00:00): Ja, men då verkar allt vara i bästa ordning! Grattis till din första edit!
Olof Bjarnason (2025-05-10 20:59:06+00:00): Vad kul!!
aceman444 (2025-06-03 21:21:33+00:00): Hi. Thanks for the additions.
But please try to use established tags as described on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org .
E.g. the object at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12826418893 is no park, nor a meadow, nor is it called "Beehive meadow" (especially in Slovakia, where local language is not English). So do not put random descriptions into the 'name' tag. Only use proper object names there. The contents of 'description' is fine.
What you wanted is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dapiary and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbeehive . Thanks.
eggie (2025-05-11 09:49:12+00:00): Oke... aanpassen is goed, maar routeren doet het niet meer. Dat stuk Margrietlaan naar het NW staat immers deels op slot voor fietsers met bicycle=use_sidepath
Gr eggie
eggie (2025-05-11 10:02:02+00:00): Ik heb het weer routeerbaar gemaakt.
Bienson (2025-05-11 00:02:57+00:00): cycleway=crossing an Radüberwegen ist doch korrekt?
neri_ (2025-05-11 00:25:42+00:00): Ich war mir bei dieser Entscheidung selbst nicht ganz sicher. Ich bin wegen folgendem Satz aus dem Wiki darauf gekommen:

"Dieses Tag darf nur in Ländern verwendet werden, in denen Radfahrerquerungen einen rechtlichen Status haben (z. B. Vorrangrecht, wenn ein gewöhnlicher Radweg dies nicht hätte)." 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:cycleway%3Dcrossing

Und habe dann folgendermaßen gedacht:

Die Radwege sind genauso Wege wie die Autostraßen, mit eigenen Fahrrad-Ampelschaltungen. Bei zwei Autostraßen wird auch nicht die kleinere der beiden als kreuzend getaggt.

Ein cycleway=crossing ist denke es ich weiterhin, wenn man für grün drücken muss oder keine eigene Fahrradampel, sondern nur eine kombinierte Fußgänger+Fahrradampel, existiert.
Aber wie gesagt, ich bin mir selbst nicht komplett sicher ob das so korrekt/hilfreich ist und markiere die Wege sonst auch wieder als cycleway=crossing.
Bienson (2025-05-12 23:22:15+00:00): Hm, also den Zusatz im Wiki verstehe ich nicht wirklich. Fakt ist, dass cycleway=crossing in DE über 10 Tausend mal existiert, daher denke ich, dass eine Nutzung in DE okay ist.

Ein praktisches Problem sehe ich darin, dass dort ja überhaupt keine crossing-Tags mehr existieren, sodass Apps wie StreetComplete dort nicht mehr nach Bordsteinen, Markierungen oder Verkehrsinseln fragen.

Meiner Meinung nach ergeben die cycleway=crossing Tags an Fahrradüberwegen also schon Sinn.
neri_ (2025-05-13 06:17:04+00:00): Ja, stimmt wohl. Ich werde die Tags heute Abend wieder ergänzen
PeachyOne (2025-05-12 11:44:25+00:00): Hello! Generally the primary name=* tag should be in the local language, in this case, Greek. A few examples where that isn't the case: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385409451
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12826483830
LakatosVL (2025-05-28 07:00:39+00:00): Hi Mimośród,
is Hamburg the real local name or it is a mistake?
Mimośród (2025-05-30 18:59:56+00:00): Hi,
Yes, it is a real local name for the area around Kopernika Street. Roczniaki is an obsolete, official name hardly ever recognised by locals.
Frans S (2025-05-13 15:12:17+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
I noticed that you map buildings in a very weird way. Try to image that most buildings are rectangular and exists of lower buildings, often with rooftops and courtyards.  Often it is a building block. Difficult to recognize. Black lines are shadows. Large shadows from high buildings  

This message I send to mappers who are struggling with recognizing the building structure.

Check that walled courtyards or walled plots are not mapped as a building. 
Don't forget to square each rectangular building as well.

About mapping of high buildings.  They show a large shadow.
Difficult area to map.
Big building blocks with several stories and courtyards

Check here how high buildings ought to be mapped.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z7uDwYm4oNmlexHIhJxGCjPpNhCQAgRia5aEJr_4MwM/edit?usp=sharing

Many tall buildings have a small building, a superstructure, lift building or something similar on the roof. They give a shadow as well, so do not map them as a separate building, just map the roof lines of the complete building, and move the whole to the footprint. You can often see it in the shadow.

Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2025-05-13 15:13:11+00:00): Hi again
Take a look at this webpage to see which adjustments I had to make.
Red lined buildings were mapped by you and removed by me.
SomeoneElse (2025-05-10 21:05:09+00:00): Thanks!
I spotted this again a couple of days ago and completely forgot that I'd commented on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156022134 7 months ago but never got around to fixing it.
rempshaener (2025-05-11 07:59:02+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe eine kleine Anmerkung: Hydranten (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12826510108)  sollen nicht mit Straßen verbunden werden.
Das ist aber leicht zu beheben: im Editor markieren, "E" drücken und hochladen.
Viele Grüße
Sanniu (2025-05-11 07:15:04+00:00): Hi, this road is wide enough and used by park service vehicles. It should be marked as service.
And please don't mark paths that not specifically for bikes as cycleway - make it as path and set the right access.
Sanniu (2025-05-13 12:45:18+00:00): Ok, no answer, will put it back
MihaelIvanjek (2025-05-12 08:48:42+00:00): Reverting mistakenly tagged ways #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166140386
Brummelwuff (2025-05-10 21:11:26+00:00): In dem Änderungssatz wurde auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12535874972/history/1 entfernt. Sollte man den auch wiederherstellen?
ChrissW-R1 (2025-05-10 22:01:59+00:00): Habe ich auch gesehen. Ist aber nur der Label. Enthält also keine weiteren Informationen als das Polygon. Habe es von daher weggelassen.
Falls der Node noch gebraucht wird, kannst du ihn gerne wiederherstellen.
Ropino (2025-05-11 18:07:47+00:00): Hi,
was ist die Quelle für die (merkwürdige) Teichbezeichnung?
gerjor (2025-05-11 19:16:10+00:00): Oh, ich bin Neuling in OSM und habe den Teich in Anlehnung an Herrn Trump zum Spaß umbenannt. Dass ich diese Änderung mit hochgeladen habe, war keine Absicht. Sorry dafür.
Ropino (2025-05-11 21:05:50+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung.
Ich habe den "Namen" wieder entfernt.
Glassman (2025-05-12 00:19:27+00:00): Check out Skagit iMap for a better boundary for the park. https://www.skagitcounty.net/Maps/iMap/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166086723
grzegorz75jan (2025-05-10 23:32:41+00:00): Jeżeli chcesz dodać np. sklep choćby typu Żabka to nie robi się to w name=Żabka tylko trzeba trochę podpatrzeć na mapie i zweryfikować z Wiki czyli pomocą dostępną choćby z poziomu edytora ponieważ na mapie też mogą być błędy poprzedników https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:shop=convenience
https://youtu.be/xBMIoypkdI4?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5&t=2323

Tak samo jak dodałeś dwór oraz zdublowałeś ośrodek kultury.

Troszkę się trzeba nauczyć podstaw edycji. Opisy zmian fatalne.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmia
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166086953
grzegorz75jan (2025-05-10 23:48:03+00:00): Zdublowałeś wiele obiektów np. Bank. 
Przecież bank był już dodany jako węzeł w obrysie budynku.

Myślę, że ktoś wycofa twoje edycje ponieważ jest za dużo błędów.

Trzeba patrzeć na mapę by zobaczyć co jest a czego nie ma oraz jak pisałem wcześniej trzeba się douczyć.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166086953
Glassman (2025-05-11 16:52:55+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Why are you removing addresses from businesses?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166087064
Glassman (2025-05-11 16:56:50+00:00): Please use a brief description of your edit instead of added hashtag... Also, landuse=forest implies that the area is logged. A better tag is natural=wood. That describes what is there and leave open to it be just a wooded area and that someone could add the landuse=forest if the area is logged.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166087149
NeisBot (2025-05-17 15:10:18+00:00): Hi tomcat9, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 82% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 highway(s)
- 9 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=166087154