piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-04-02 05:07:56+00:00): Hello Juanito1986, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1374003409
https://osm.org/way/1374003410
https://osm.org/relation/18928546

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=164401705
Taya_S (2025-04-02 07:17:31+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164405513
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-08 09:28:48+00:00): Hello!

You used
colour=braun
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/921236899/history

Have you maybe meant
colour=brown
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
NeisBot (2025-04-02 05:19:50+00:00): Hello Juanito1986, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1374005209
https://osm.org/relation/18928582

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=164401957
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-29 07:11:01+00:00): @Taya_S Contributor is back again, see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=22488675
Taya_S (2026-04-29 07:25:36+00:00): Thanks. 

I'm always somewhat dumbfounded when someone comes back after being blocked for a whole year, just to perform the same petty vandalism yet again. 

Lets check back in 10 years. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20198
NeisBot (2025-04-02 05:21:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
NeisReview (2025-04-06 18:21:35+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164430556
b-holdet (2025-04-02 09:43:27+00:00): Skulle denne her https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5142509319 ikke være flyttet til Charlottenlund?
Lige nu ser det ud til at Salon Gro stadig ligger det forkerte sted.
osmviborg (2025-04-02 10:14:23+00:00): Flyttet
b-holdet (2025-04-02 10:16:00+00:00): 👍
Frans S (2025-04-03 14:06:46+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You mapped a few buildings and followed the tree lines rather than interpolate the rooflines. Just follow the expected rooflines.
Best regard
Grass-snake (2025-04-02 18:40:26+00:00): Здравствуйте, уточните пожалуйста:
1. Что это за питомник? Может быть я смогу заменить на более подходящую POI?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1374008714
2. Песчанка — это название "улица Песчанка" или просто местное название?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1374008715
silversurfer83 (2025-04-02 20:36:30+00:00): Hi :)

auch hier wären die lifecylce prefixes eine Lösung. Setze vor das "highway" noch "abandoned:"

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164402448
Frans S (2025-04-11 10:29:27+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Use the correct tagging please.
See the instructions and this wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Myanmar
Never connect a highway direct to a waterway when it not crossing it.
Don't map traces in farmland which just give access to farmland.
Don't add a 'one way' tag to a highway. We cannot see the sign on the imagery.
I changed highways into farmland mostly into tracks.
Best regards
Best regards
stasiu512 (2025-04-17 17:33:34+00:00): Cześć, mógłbyś sprawdzić po śladach czy ulica Zatokowa obok, jest już dwukierunkowa? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188412905
Artur | Yanosik (2025-04-24 11:40:16+00:00): Cześć, według śladów na Zatokowej nadal jest ruch jednokierunkowy.
Greg_Rose (2025-04-02 06:00:41+00:00): Please DO NOT map outside your area as you just did.
eggie (2025-04-02 05:59:02+00:00): Top!  Dit is concreet commentaar.

Mapse,
egguie
Frans S (2025-04-22 14:14:50+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
B: Overlapping buildings.
C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
E: Buildings not squared.
H: Included a yard of clearing.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164403034
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-04-08 22:07:53+00:00): This changeset incorrectly changed a number of building into landuse
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164403161
eggie (2025-04-02 06:13:47+00:00): Tio... Geen nieuwe adressen aanmaken. Tag bij op de bestaande adresnodes.
De info heb ik samengevoegd.
Gr eggie
eggie (2025-04-02 06:21:18+00:00): Bij GoMap zul je denk ik steeds het commentaar moeten aanpassen.
Bv bankjes geplaatst.
Gr eggie
Lupin the Third (2025-04-02 17:48:06+00:00): Yeah, my bad. I just wanted to add the two benches there, but my old comment was still there. And I was just a little too fast with clicking commit 😅
eggie (2025-04-02 17:53:36+00:00): No problem... :)
eggie (2025-04-02 06:59:26+00:00): Tip  Geen adressen aanmaken svp in osm.  Ik heb de info samengevoegd met de al aanwezige adresnode.
je bedoeling is uiteraard goed. 
MVG
eggie
reigi (2025-04-02 17:05:23+00:00): Hallo Lennan, zuerst mal herzlich willkommen unter den Mappern. Schön, dass du dazu beiträgst, die OSM-Daten zu verbessern. Du hast in diesem Changeset die L47 mit bicycle=no getaggt. Das ist leider nicht korrekt. Schau mal bitte hier im OSM-Wiki (quasi die Hilfe-Funktion) beim mappen). Die ersten beiden Sätze zeigen dir, was nicht stimmt. Bitte berichtige deine Eingabe indem du deinen hinzugefügten tag wieder löschst.
Lennan (2025-04-02 17:20:30+00:00): Wo soll ich schauen?
reigi (2025-04-02 18:38:23+00:00): Sorry. Vergessen, den Link einzufügen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:bicycle
Lennan (2025-04-02 18:58:42+00:00): Ok werde ich gleich ändern. Kann man denn irgendwo die Eignung auch eintragen? Es gibt ja genug Wege und Straßen die einfach ungeeignet sind. 
Grade wenn Drittanbieterapps wie Wandrer etc. Sich das ziehen, kommen da blöde Dinge bei raus.
reigi (2025-04-02 19:08:34+00:00): Die Eignung ist ja sehr unterschiedlich zu sehen je nachdem welches z.B. Verkehrsmittel man verwendet. Z.B. kann ein Rennrad  normalerweise nur auf Asphalt bewegt werden, während ein Mountainbike eigentlich fast überall fahren kann. In diesem Zusammenhang ist das tag "surface" wichtig. Die Routenplaner werten das aus und richten ihre Vorschläge danach aus. Es gibt aber noch viele andere tags, die in diesem Zusammenhang wichtig sind.
Lennan (2025-04-02 19:14:53+00:00): Alles klar, danke für den Input!
reigi (2025-04-02 19:19:28+00:00): gerne, frag ruhig nach. Vielleicht hilft dir das zum Einstieg https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
Lennan (2025-04-02 19:31:52+00:00): Danke, ich schau mich mal um.
NeisReview (2025-04-03 05:09:13+00:00): #NodeDragging

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for contributing to the map. I’ve reviewed your recent edits and noticed that at least one node of a way was moved. This can sometimes happen unintentionally, and it’s led to some unusual intersections or overlaps between street segments and other map elements.

Could you kindly confirm whether these changes were intentional or if they may have been made by mistake?

Thank you, and I look forward to your response!
---
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7161777917
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/766829937
eggie (2025-04-02 06:57:07+00:00): Herinnering.. Geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt gedaan. Medemappers zullen dat op prijs stellen.

MVG
eggie
radiotrefoil (2025-05-19 04:38:52+00:00): Hi, I feel like the access=no tag on way/22731635 is ambiguous given that foot=designated. Just confirming, it is accessible by foot? I understand there is a gate at the western entrance to Ingar Road that can be bypassed on foot but restricts access to cars.
Warin61 (2025-05-19 06:12:13+00:00): Access for HGVs, buses, taxies etc etc... Are these all to be stated? 
The access=no means no access unless there is a following dedicated tag .. such as in this case foot=yes, bicycle=yes and motor_vehicle=private (to allow NP service vehicles) ...
aharvey (2025-05-19 06:42:00+00:00): HGV, busses, taxis are all covered under `motor_vehicle`. There's not much left outside of motor_vehicle, foot, and bicycle.

I understand your point that you're applying a default of no then applying the exceptions, but why should that be access=no vs access=yes. Unlike a military base which might have a general "no access" restriction regardless of mode, a general access restriction doesn't really apply here. If anything it would be there is general public access, but specific modes are restricted due to regulation.
Warin61 (2025-05-20 07:53:38+00:00): I don't think public access by motor vehicle is allowed... locked gates at access points would indicate that?
radiotrefoil (2025-05-20 08:12:24+00:00): I think `motor_vehicle=private` `foot=designated` `bicycle=designated` is sufficient, considering `motor_vehicle=private` encompasses the only significant access restriction
eggie (2025-04-02 06:55:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisReview (2025-04-02 17:28:14+00:00): #DeletionsCheck

Hi, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed many of your changes in this set involve deletions.

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.
SekeRob (2025-04-03 16:25:13+00:00): Hi,

You keep on removing tratto and similar street name prefixes and suffixes to street names as shown on signs ON THE GROUND, which is what we map. Truly can't care what ANNCSU or the tax office says it is. If it is different from ON THE GROUND, then you can tag it under official_name 
(751000 uses world wide) or alt_name. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aofficial_name

At any rate, there's no conflict ON THE GROUND, so I'm going to revert to what's shown on the corner sign.

cheers
Jordi MF (2025-04-02 18:07:06+00:00): Este changeset se ha revertido porque las las comunidades aragonesa y catalana no están de acuerdo con los cambios de categoría de las antiguas carreteras nacionales (N-xxxa) que se habían etiquetado como "trunk" porque ya no tienen importancia nacional.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164433373
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-07 18:43:39+00:00): wycofane jako nieprzedyskutowany import, po zignorowaniu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164065893
eggie (2025-04-02 07:59:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Je actie geeft wel veel foutmeldingen.
warnings:almost_junction:highway-highway
  	1


  warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway
  	4
Alle begin is moeilijk. 
Langsliggende trottoirs worden vaak opgenomen in de tagging van de naastliggende highway. Bv het fietspad met siewalk=right.
Ook kun je niet zomaar paden trekken over de kaart zonder verbindingen te maken met kruisende wegen. Dat routeert niet. 

Ook heb je bestaande voetpaden verwijderd van de kaart? Waarom? Die zijn er toch gewoon. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Foodking (2025-04-02 08:11:06+00:00): Ik wist niet dat je de errors eruit moest halen ;)

De 'voetpaden' heb ik verwijderd omdat het formeel geen voetpaden zijn en geen onderdeel van de infrastructuur. Het echte voetpad ligt een paar meter verder, zoals ik heb aangegeven. Er missen nog veel meer voetpaden dus die zal ik in de nabije toekomst toevoegen.
eggie (2025-04-02 08:19:24+00:00): Hoi,

Dat langsliggende  'voetpad'heb ik verwijderd en opgenomen in het fietspad met sidewalk=yes

De paden die e verwijderd hebt zijn formeel wellicht geen G7 voetpaden, maar ze zijn er wel en duidelijk bedoeld voor voetgangers. Hoe kom je anders bij je huisdeur. Die heb ik weer ingetekend.
Langsliggende voetpaden worden vaak niet ingetekend omdat het niet routeert. Probeer maar eens van het voetpad naar het fietspad te routeren. Eén stap is dan vele honderden meters in de routering. Wanneer er een groenstrook tussen zit is het anders.
Consensus is er echter niet over apart ingetekende voetpaden.
De reconstructie van de parkeerplaatsen en de verlegging van de fietspaden was oke. Dat is echt een verbetering van de kaart.
Maar... overweeg mijn tips over de langsliggende voetpaden.
Op het forum loopt een draadje over dit onderwerp.
Ik heb het langsliggende voetpad nu even verwijderd omdat het een soort van één is met dat fietspad.
Er is wel een scheiding in bestrati ng vandaar segregated=yes

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2025-04-02 08:24:15+00:00): Zie hier... De meningen zijn verdeeld.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/het-intekenen-van-het-trottoir-als-highway/81169/175

Er zijn verschillende belangengroepen. (Rolstoelgebruik trottoirs, blindengeleideapps. )
Foodking (2025-04-02 08:58:33+00:00): Die scheiding is er niet fysiek. Niet meer althans. Het is slechts de kleur van de gebruikte bestrating. Voor de rest is het exact dezelfde weg. Formeel zelfs geen fietspad (borden ontbreken ook hiervoor).
eggie (2025-04-02 09:35:05+00:00): Ahhhh... wonderlijk Dat zie je steeds meer. Houd rekening met elkaar borden.
Vaak staat daar dan wel een fietsertje op. Je zult toch moeten weten waar je hoort te fietsen. 
Zou het toch in dit geval een fietspad laten...  en als je zegt het voetgangersgedeelte is geïntegreerd dan zeker geen apart voetpad intekenen.
Wanneer niet duidelijk is waar je moet lopen (ik denk overigens van wel.. op het rechter gedeelte) dan zou het segregated=no zijn. 

Wanneer borden ontbreken (vreemd) dan kun je ook Ducktagging toepassen Het kwaakt als een eend dus is het een eend. Het is ingericht als fietspad... dus... 
Up to you.
Volgens mij staat er na de Nieuweburen gewoon een G11 bord. Is dat ook verwijderd? 
eggie
eggie (2025-04-02 09:41:14+00:00): Vanaf de Doelenstraat staat nog steeds een G11 bord volgens mij. Bij de schoenmakersperk ontbrak het altijd al.
Denk dus terecht een G11 Verplicht fietspad. 
Zie ook Verkeersborden bestand van de Gemeente
https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=53.203950824&lng=5.794347704&z=19
Foodking (2025-04-02 10:00:49+00:00): Interessant :)
Ik was in de veronderstelling dat een gebodsbord bij iedere kruising herhaald moest worden.
eggie (2025-04-02 10:24:41+00:00): Dat is ook zo....  , maar wellicht horen ze wel geplaatst te worden.
Bericht naar de Gemeente? 
Dan weet je of er wel of geen brommers mogen komen bv. ... of zelfs autoverkeer? Het is nu onduidelijk.
geisthugo123 (2025-04-03 23:15:28+00:00): Hi and thank you for the edit.
You created an overlapping section with two ways on each other here.
Was this intended?
Best regards
Ess Bee (2025-04-04 06:03:25+00:00): Hello,
Yes tank, I now realize how stupid my change was!
The overlapping section appears because I was not capable to make a proper change with the editor used:
So the overlapping section should be deleted... I will try again ...
Regards
Ess Bee (2025-04-04 06:20:20+00:00): Sorry, I am not fit enough with the editor!
(I use https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=21/49.9193660/8.5108835)

Could please help and delete the stupid overlapping section I created 2 days ago?
geisthugo123 (2025-04-04 07:34:03+00:00): Hi,
yes I can do it later today, no worries.
Will give an update later.
Best regards
geisthugo123 (2025-04-07 21:02:26+00:00): Hi I changed it now.
You will see it in a few days on the map.
I think this is the best way connection-wise as there is a bike relation which goes straight into Hauptstraße from the sidepath.
Best regards
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-05 06:03:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/939051569/history

maybe shop=variety_store would be better for Dollar Tree?
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dvariety_store
Aarogya Pandey (2025-04-03 11:38:26+00:00): Well mapped with detail information. Thank you for mapping.
Keep contributing. Mappy Mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164405450
NeisReview (2025-04-03 18:23:52+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164432667
Константин Гам (2025-04-03 19:40:47+00:00): Спасибо, связался
silversurfer83 (2025-04-02 21:12:53+00:00): Hi there :)

two things:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

What you put in "name" is a drescription and if the language differs from the local language it should be "description:en=*"

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164406048
Gregory Peony (2025-04-18 23:59:39+00:00): Overall a high quality contribution. All buildings are valid, have the correct shape, and are generally accurate. Some of them include the shadow cast by the building in the footprint. Keeping in mind the direction shadows are cast can aid imagery interpretation. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164406149
KNaing (2025-09-02 05:58:57+00:00): Thanks for your collaboration. Please make sure to draw your buildings as accurately as possible and don't forget to square the building, select them and type 'Q'
TeBaMa (2025-09-02 06:47:25+00:00): Hi KNaing, I think you made a mistake. I always map with the building tool of JOSM. The buildings are automatically squared.
KNaing (2025-09-02 08:54:51+00:00): Sorry for that, may be wrong message, I just learn about validating.
SekeRob (2025-04-06 15:16:55+00:00): "re seke"? Non molto bello. Gli errori si verificano quando 2 mappatori lavorano nella stessa area. Il risultato è stato che tu hai rimosso il duplicato e io ho rimosso il duplicato e metà di Via scomparso completamente.

Saluti
Glassman (2025-04-02 17:01:35+00:00): From imagery, it appears that pedestrian and bike access is allowable. A gate can be added as a node in the path at each end. Can you review this edits and corrected as needed? Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164406682
User24849293 (2025-04-02 23:26:03+00:00): The street view is 5+ years old. Sometime in the past year or so, the north end was completely fenced off by the electric utility with no trespassing signs (and I believe the south end is closed now too but would have to go look again). In any case, my main goal was to fix the inconsistency where this specific segment of the utility right-of-way was tagged as a bike-accessible path, even though none of the other segments in the neighborhood are.
Glassman (2025-04-02 23:32:41+00:00): Thanks for the update, I just wanted to make sure.
Gregory Peony (2025-07-27 03:43:41+00:00): Hi, you identified buildings in the imagery and distinguished between square and round footpritns, well done. You have however mapped the square buildings with very unique and complex shapes After mapping buildings, please remember to square their corners. Most buildings have square corners because that's easy to build. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that the corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, use the `Q` key to square the corners. This [video about squaring features](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a guide.
Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164406711
Gregory Peony (2025-04-02 15:26:54+00:00): The residential area should have been modified to prevent overlap with building footprints (outlined in mapping guide). All buildings here are valid though some are not accurate nor appropriately squared. Highways overlap footprints. Features should not be given a name tag unless they have a name; put hashtags in your changeset comment (when saving) instead. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164406721
Gregory Peony (2025-04-02 15:47:17+00:00): I removed the name tags in Changeset: 164427698. Residential areas should not share nodes with building footprints.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164406721
Gregory Peony (2025-04-02 15:31:00+00:00): all footprints valid though some are inaccurate. Try to see if the footprint can be made accurate using squaring and circling then the ID editing shortcuts (?) before concluding that the building is based on a less likely shape. The footprint I flagged should be square not round.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164407021
Gregory Peony (2025-04-02 15:44:34+00:00): You joined the nodes of this highway to a building footprint. Hold alt while editing to prevent your cursor from snapping to data. This highway crosses barriers and buildings and should not pass through this settlement. See Changeset: 164427507 for my resolution. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164407149