piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
w_morland (2024-01-07 17:34:09+00:00): Just flagging that a couple of the paths you added have been removed since the aerial imagery so I have update the ways. Thanks for your edit.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-25 09:10:19+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9445173494
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11217424778

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NieWnen (2023-09-25 18:06:34+00:00): Cześć, dzięki zmianę, kilka drobnych uwag:
- jak "bot" zwrócił uwagę, do automatów paczkowych nie dodajemy `name`, nazwa się wyrenderuje na podstawie `ref` i `brand`.

- jeśli chodzi o `traffic_calming` na skrzyżowaniach, a rozumiem, że miałeś tu na myśli tzw. "skrzyżowanie wyniesione" to tu raczej `hump` nie pasuje, bardziej `traffic_calming=table`. W edytorze iD mogą być różne tłumaczenia pod to, z tego co widzę, to jest "Wyniesienie jezdni".

- jak kończysz prowadzić chodnik obok jezdni i nagle się urywa, to warto mimo to, go połączyć z jezdnią, a jak nie jest to możliwe to dodać `noexit=yes` na ostatnim niepołączonym węźle – kwestia routingu i walidacji niepołączonych ścieżek.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1210711301
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1210711302

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1210711305 – to nie jest unclassified, wiem, że nazwa jest myląca bo dla nas brzmi kalkowo jak nieokreślona, ale to znaczy zupełnie coś innego. Drogi typu unclassified, to drogi rangi używanej do połączeń między np. miejscowościami w gminie, zdecydowanie ważniejsze niż lokalne residential. Najpewniej tutaj wystarczy zwykłe `highway=service`, chyba, że to podjazd do 1 posesji, to można dodać jeszcze `service=driveway`
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dunclassified

Unclassified poprawiłem.
filip769 (2023-12-15 21:28:48+00:00): wrong elevation https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11217424617/
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-19 14:10:22+00:00): ele=155467 w https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11217424617/history jest wadliwa, usuwam
CRCulver (2026-06-20 13:53:02+00:00): What is the source for the religion=jewish tag that you added on this way?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460213113
Guxim (2026-06-20 14:47:28+00:00): Hi! 
The source is a physical memorial plaque installed at the entrance of the site by local municipal institutions, officially marking it as the Jewish Cemetery. Although the individual gravestones are no longer visible, the site is officially recognized on-ground.
Tomas_J (2023-09-27 19:45:11+00:00): Ahoj,
pozadoval si kontrolu tejto sady zmien - za mna vyborna praca, bez pripomienok. Ak by si mal k comukolvek otazky, mozes napisat do tejto diskusnej skupiny - https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk. Pokracuje, prosim, v editacii mapy - je to praca, ktora ma zmysel. 
Zdravi
Tomas_J
eggie (2023-09-25 12:10:53+00:00): Dag Lukas  De info heb ik samengevoegd met de BAG adresnode.
Groet
eggie
lukask99 (2023-09-25 12:32:35+00:00): OK, dank. Ik moet daar nog eens induiken, in de BAG-data
lukask99 (2023-09-25 16:53:32+00:00): Als ik het goed begrijp, moet je winkels en horeca etc. in de adresnode zelf opnemen? Dus geen aparte POI?
eggie (2023-09-25 16:57:51+00:00): Klopt.. Dat is nu de consensus sinds we adresnodes importeren vanuit de BAG.
Gr eggie
lukask99 (2023-09-25 17:07:24+00:00): OK, goed om te weten. Er is nog heel wat te doen op dat gebied bij mij in de buurt ☺️
lukask99 (2023-09-26 11:27:37+00:00): Mag ik je nog een vraag stellen over BAG-adressen aan de hand van een concreet voorbeeld?
Node: 2715102568, Marnixstraat 65-67 Haarlem. Op nr. 65 is de Marnix-apotheek gevestigd, nr. 67 is ernaast, waar nu alleen 67-RD staat. De apotheek heeft ook de begane grond van nr. 67 in gebruik, maar het officiële adres is op nr. 65. Is de huidige indeling in OSM correct?
eggie (2023-09-26 12:02:56+00:00): Volgens mij geeft de BAG geen gecombineerde adressen. 
Maar dit is dan de uitzondering die de regel bevestigt.
De BAG is overigens niet 'heilig'  Wel wordt er regelmatig geupdated vanuit de BAG. Fouten blijven er dan insluipen. 
Sommige Gemeenten doen kennelijk wel gecombineerde adressen en de BAG (Kadaster)  neemt het over.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=marnixstraat+65&objectId=0392200000039713&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=103917.826&geometry.y=490449.072&zoomlevel=15

Mocht het niet kloppen met de werkelijkheid dan kun je via bovenstaande site een terugmelding doen.


In OSM staat het precies zo als in de BAG .

De apotheek kun je uiteraard nog toevoegen.

MVG
eggie
lukask99 (2023-09-26 12:23:24+00:00): Wederom dank ☺️
wermak (2023-09-28 05:12:42+00:00): Hallo radlerhh, 

warum diese Änderung an der B 404? Die Straße ist hier meines Wissens an vielen Stellen immer noch eine Baustelle, deshalb ist highway=construction doch korrekt?!

Schöne Grüße
radlerhh (2023-09-28 08:12:07+00:00): Hallo wermak,
danke für den Hinweis! - es scheint tatsächlich nur der Teil bis Dwerkaten freigegeben zu sein und bis Kreuz Bargteheide noch nicht.
Frans S (2023-09-25 10:33:54+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)

D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.
Multi story buildings not placed on their footprint.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141721432
eggie (2023-09-25 12:09:03+00:00): De info heb ik nu samengevoegd met de BAG adresnode. De postcode is dus nu ook aangepast aan de data van het Kadaster.

Groet
eggie
lukask99 (2023-09-25 12:28:32+00:00): Dank je
flohoff (2023-09-25 11:04:13+00:00): Moin,
hast du hier vielleicht irgendwo einen Fehler beseitigt wo ein Node aus der B516 weit verschoben war?

Ich hatte hier in der Routingüberwachung einen Alarm und das war diese Stelle (Die aber schon wieder bereinigt ist)

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=449598,509175#51.4859,8.35396,18z

Flo
wies1 (2023-09-25 12:51:14+00:00): Hallo,
als ich in der Gegend Landuses bearbeitet habe und einen track verändert habe, fiel mir dieser "Knick" in der B516 plötzlich auf. Ich habe ihn dann sogleich beseitigt.
Gruss
wies1
bxl-forever (2023-09-25 10:37:43+00:00): Hello,

I suppose this implies that their headquartiers is no longer on their iconic tower, right?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118022699

Please confirm.  I will clean up the tags, because after your change Proximus is twice on the map.
Jeancf (2023-09-25 11:53:53+00:00): The move process started today and should be completed be the end of the year. After that the Proximus Towers will be dismantled and rebuilt.
I guess during the move both the Proximus Towers and the Boréal should have the same tags.
Frans S (2023-09-25 10:29:02+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here as well.
A few remarks. Most buildings are rather rectangular. Please square them. Why not map all building on this plot. 
The residential area was mapped a few years ago and don't fit the whole residential area. Please adjust it so that it do not cross buildings.
Bigger buildings often have a courtyard. Please include them into your mappings.
Where clearly visible, add courtyards please.
This is how to map a building with courtyards.

 1   Draw the outer outline of the building as an area. Tag as a building
 2  Draw each of the inner courtyards/plazas as areas. Tag as needed, or not at all
 3  Hold 'SHIFT' and select all the areas
 4  Press 'C' to create a multipolygon with all the areas
 Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141721981
Frans S (2023-09-25 10:20:56+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141722083
user_2973170 (2023-09-25 13:46:22+00:00): ?
JuanjoMC (2023-09-25 13:50:43+00:00): Hi,

please see here for explanations about the revert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141717858#map=19/50.88007/4.32208
JuanjoMC (2023-09-25 13:53:51+00:00): also here about the construction site you removed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141717992#map=18/50.87986/4.32307
kapazao (2023-09-25 13:38:40+00:00): Hola, al núcleo de población no hay que crearle una relación para indicar que está dentro de la zona residencial, esto ya se entiende por su posición y no es necesario. Esa relación sobra.
Los elementos que están dentro de un área ya se entiende están relacionados y no hay que crear otra relación a parte.
En caso de la relación del municipio sí se indica que el nodo de población es el núcleo principal "admin_centre" porque podría haber más núcleos y así se determina en esa relación, que no es un área.
Espero lo hayas entendido.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141722720
dieghernan (2023-09-25 13:46:48+00:00): Hola kapazao, igual es necesario entonces que me ayudes. El problema que estaba teniendo es que el buscador de direcciones creaba direcciones erróneas (por ejemplo Calle Doctor Segura 4, San Antonio [incorrecto], Alquife) y creo que está relacionado con las relaciones. Si quieres seguimos por privado y te cuento en detalle
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-21 08:17:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11174316081 - "Cave" is description here, not its actual local name, right?
StopConsuming_StartProducing (2024-04-21 08:52:55+00:00): Wasn't me who named it, I just adjusted it. ;-)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-21 10:29:57+00:00): got confused, sorry, asked on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140935756 now
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-21 10:30:12+00:00): Also: nice username!
StopConsuming_StartProducing (2024-04-21 17:24:28+00:00): Thx. And thx for your help regarding the automated edits last year 👍😉
Jrachi (2024-12-12 10:45:15+00:00): Vi è qualcosa di estraneo in codesto ref:REI!

Ivo
vlakos555 (2023-09-25 11:46:30+00:00): Mám fotky, že sa to volá tak.
damianeue (2024-05-13 16:00:25+00:00): Ciao Marco,
i numeri civici non vanno inseriti nelle informazioni degli edifici ma come nodi in prossimità di dove si trova il cartellino con il numero civico all'esterno dell'edificio
VictorIE (2023-09-26 11:07:12+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/858702717
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148917446
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153983139

Do these ways represent existing roads? Should they be joined up at the north end?
Verwolff1 (2023-09-26 16:23:13+00:00): I went there today and indeed the northern part of the former Ballymakenny road was demolished. The southern part is left only for connecting the Linenfield housing estate with the newly constructed (straight) part of Ballymakenny Road.
VictorIE (2023-09-26 19:01:07+00:00): Ah, thanks. What triggered my interest was one of the quality control websites reporting the new and old roads being very close together, but not being connected. :) In bona fide cases of this, they can be tagged noexit=yes like here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10255474724

When an object is demolished or removed in the real world, they can be tagged like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1211078071 Keeping the old way and tagging it like this stops people remapping objects that were on older photos.
eggie (2023-09-25 12:06:18+00:00): Dag Eric, 

Je hoeft aan reguliere niet toe te voegen dat je er mag fietsen. Dat is default.
MVG
eggie
EricPrd (2023-09-25 12:11:23+00:00): ok
eggie (2023-09-25 12:20:45+00:00): Kwaad kan het niet. Laat je niet weerhouden door kritiek.
Groet
eggie
EricPrd (2023-09-25 12:32:51+00:00): nee, hoor, ik probeerde een andere app, die osm gebruikt, het daar te laten zien als fietsroute.
eggie (2023-09-25 12:41:49+00:00): Ah  zo...
Fietsroutes zitten in OSM in routerelaties. Elke kaart laat dat weer anders zien.
Hier loopt bv een MTB route yellow:yellow:green_triangle
en verschillende wandelroutes waaronder het Pieterpad. Eén route is hier stuk.
Komt niet door jouw actie. 
 Zal eens kijken of die simpel te herstellen is. 
Hier de verschillende routerelaties.
https://mtb.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=15.0/50.9909/5.8929
eggie (2023-09-25 12:44:12+00:00): Fixed.. De fout zat in de Limbrichterstraat Sittard
EricPrd (2023-09-25 13:58:42+00:00): het ging me eigenlijk om het stukje helweg wat nu nog groen gestippeld is naar gewoon groen. , dat is nl ook (meestal) geschikt voor gewone toerfiets. Dat slingerende mtb stuk niet. Maar maakt niet uit hoor.
Jrachi (2024-11-27 12:00:21+00:00): Ciao.
Non è necessario aggiungere alle relazioni di tipo hikling le barriere, sono già parte della way

Ivo
Paolo Montevecchi (2024-11-28 05:36:36+00:00): Ciao, giusto Ivo hai ragione. Sistemato!
Grazie
jan_k31 (2023-10-01 20:07:06+00:00): Weet jij zeker dat dit pad er is? Ik tref hier geen pad aan.
kasteel (2023-10-03 10:01:13+00:00): Er is hier zeker wel een pad. Ik ben er overheen gelopen. Zowel aan de Beukenburgerlaan als aan het Leyense bos zit een ingang (door een hekje, gewoon toegankelijk). Het pad loopt over het gras. Niet altijd even duidelijk,dat wel, zeker het deel langs het spoor nabij het bos. Het pad ten noorden van de boerderij is zeer duidelijk gemarkeerd door een draad aan weerszijden. Op de luchtfoto kun je het pad ook onderscheiden.
Carto75 (2023-10-02 12:35:30+00:00): bonjour, attention il ne faut pas écrire "allée de parking" si la voie n'a pas de nom. Merci de votre correction
Elizen (2023-10-27 13:32:53+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, откуда были взяты наименования у https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/339594305 и https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130768289
Потому что по пкк на этих территориях числится "территория Музыкальная"
mavl (2023-09-25 14:55:27+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот гидрант уже обозначен на карте.  
Этот пакет правок отменён.
osmviborg (2023-09-25 11:05:05+00:00): Hej. Slet ikke noget reelt findes. I dette tilfælde vil det rigtige være at tagge med access=no
osmviborg (2023-09-25 11:06:10+00:00): eller access=private
mcliquid (2023-09-27 17:22:21+00:00): Are there really 13 signs on one road that there is a u-turn forbidden?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141725689
EST19 (2023-09-28 13:28:08+00:00): Hi. MCliquid
Probably not, but at the beginning of a roundabout, you would have
to drive against traffic to do a u-turn,......having the roundabout there, to do it
the safe and legal way... but indeed, it is sometimes possible to do a 
u-turn in front of a roundabout, without having to drive against traffic, if 
you are not already at the beginning of the roundabout, or are blocked by 
markings, or a white line on the road separating the backwards and forward lines / roads.
But using the roundabout, is usually the better option, and the safest...

Sometimes the navigational system performs a u-turn even on a motorway,
because the motorway is in 2 directions,  even when it has separate lanes divided 
by markings or a line.
So the navigational system suggests a u-turn, ....instead of using the roundabout, 
just because the possibility of a u-turn is almost always automatically added..
suggesting that there are no further obstacles like a white separating line on the road,
or a sign....
But you are right.
Not 13 u-turn signs, but that does not  mean you can actually perform a u-turn...on
that particular peace of road,  so if a roundabout is close, it is always better to use that,
so the navigational system needs to know that too, so making a particular peace of road,
with no u-turns, because a roundabout is close, when navigating with OSM+ is the better option
Thanks for the comment.
Hans.
muralito (2023-09-25 18:33:31+00:00): Reverted. Please don't move the border. The border must follow the shape of Martin Garcia Island before both island joined in recent yeares.
Geo_Cop (2023-09-28 12:16:14+00:00): Hi Muralito
Thank you for the information and reverting the data.
mavl (2023-09-25 15:00:11+00:00): Здравствуйте. Здесь не сдают квартиры. Здесь нет зданий. Только деревья парка.  
Этот пакет правок отменён.
DP24PH (2023-10-07 05:04:21+00:00): It's so sad to see that the R-2 bicycle routes got lapsed post-pandemic, despite the national government efforts to save all the bike routes.


DP24
ganmatthew09 (2023-10-07 12:42:16+00:00): Yeah, its unfortunate. I personally used the one on Taft when it was still around.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-25 11:40:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2186657798
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429707440

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2023-09-27 06:55:39+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/245648364. Please notice Wikipedia as a internal language connection, we need only one Wikipedia entry. You can change the value, if the Wikipedia article in other languages better.
Darshula (2023-10-03 19:02:05+00:00): Noted! Thank you for your correction.
kmpoppe (2023-10-01 06:14:56+00:00): Hi Omar,

Is "." really the name of this shop? This sounds strange?

K
kapazao (2023-09-25 13:29:26+00:00): Hola, en casos como este mejor dejar el elemento más antiguo y moverlo al lugar adecuado, así no perdemos el histórico.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141728639
citrula (2023-09-25 22:46:24+00:00): Please don't use descriptive names!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141728971
Allison P (2023-09-25 23:23:15+00:00): For a more thorough explanation, the feature you have added is not called "Gas Well". It is a gas well. It would be like saying your dog is named Dog. Despite what you might think from what the editor tells you, you are never obligated to add a name (name=*) to a feature. Only when a feature actually has a name should this tag be used

On that note, alphanumeric identifiers are also not names. You can represent those by adding a reference (ref=*).

For more information, see the OpenStreetMap Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
citrula (2023-09-26 16:08:56+00:00): Thank you for making the changes, and thank you Allison for providing the additional info
citrula (2023-09-26 17:10:34+00:00): Hello, I updated your entry to adjust some of the formatting of the tags, as well as remove the description. The description is not a place to advertise your business. You can review my changes here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141784384
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141729237
Geo-Tobi (2024-10-03 06:59:02+00:00): Hier wurde surface asphalt gesetzt, aber tracktype auf grade2 belassen. Absicht?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37260645
Geo-Tobi (2024-10-03 07:08:45+00:00): Weiterhin wurde hier surface auf compacted gesetzt, aber grade4 belassen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24935972
k127 (2024-10-04 15:08:49+00:00): Der Ersteller des ersten von dir bemängelten Weges [1] (2009) hat damals bereits `tracktype` bestimmt [2].

Mit meiner Änderung (Version 9, 2023) habe ich `surface` ergänzt.

Danach gibt es eine Version 10 vom Ersteller (!), in der er den Tag`motor_vehicle` ergänzt. Mit dieser Änderung in Version 10 verstehe ich meinen Beitrag von Version 9 als vom Ersteller angenommen und auch abgenommen.

Desweiteren verstehe gemäß Wiki ich die gleichzeitige Verwendung von `tracktype` und `surface` nicht als falsch bzw. Widerspruch. Das habe ich dir aber bereits in einem anderen Änderungssatzkommentar [3] dargelegt.


Beste Grüße
k127


[1] <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37260645>
[2] <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/1732652>
[3] <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141296074> (04.10.2024, 14:57)
AmyCupcake (2023-09-25 12:31:12+00:00): https://www.barcelona.cat/mobilitat/ca/actualitat-i-recursos/noticies/el-pont-de-santander-recupera-la-mobilitat-de-persones-i-de-vehicles-1319135 name source btw
citrula (2023-09-25 22:45:15+00:00): Please don't use descriptive names. It is sufficient to add the sport=pickleball tag like you already have
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141729392
quantenschaum (2023-09-27 12:14:14+00:00): Hoj Frank, the Actueel PDOK images are actually older than those in the "2023 Quick" layers and RWS publishes the positions of the buoys as in the BaZ at https://data.overheid.nl/dataset/2c5f6817-d902-4123-9b1d-103a0a484979
Frank314 (2023-09-27 13:10:12+00:00): Hoi Quantenschaum. Was not trying to change positions of buoys. Was only adding the blue guidance lights at the docking station of the ferry at the ferry harbour Den Helder (same as on the Texel side, one (blinking) low light and one fixed upper light
quantenschaum (2023-09-27 18:43:11+00:00): No problem. It was just as info for you, maybe you find it useful. I started updating the buoys op de Waddenzee based on the dataset by RWS because I was sailing there in the summer. Beautiful there!
quantenschaum (2023-09-27 18:45:29+00:00): Are you a sailor and maybe using OsmAnd? You might want to look at
http://waddenzee.duckdns.org/
https://github.com/quantenschaum/mapping
gscholz (2023-09-26 07:42:46+00:00): Hi Shishir Teja,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping and displaced ways:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141729590

I have reverted it to fix those issues.
Guido
fititnt (2023-11-19 23:29:34+00:00): Olá angieyeungg.

Qual é a fonte de referência (ou, se não tem, qual seu raciocínio lógico usando apenas Bing Maps Aerial) para leisure=park em https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1210754555 ?
dieterdreist-CAI (2024-01-18 14:28:22+00:00): Buongiorno, ho notato che hai rimosso foot=yes dalla piazza way 353727123 che ha anche access=no, quindi con questa modifica la piazza non è più accessibile da nessuno. Ti chiedo gentilmente di non modificare i tag se non ne conosci il significato.

Grazie,
Martin
toponomastica_comune_arenzano (2024-01-18 15:21:34+00:00): Martin ho un dubbio circa quello che dici ho fatto io controlla con achavi
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141730750
toponomastica_comune_arenzano (2024-01-18 15:25:17+00:00): Essendo area pedestrian è superflio il foot=yes e josm corregge suggerisce le correzioni automaticamente forse quallo che c'e' di sbagliato è l'access=no