piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-11-19 14:12:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-19 14:12:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Home remodeling contractor in New London County CT"
user_5359 (2025-11-19 20:12:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You use wrong keys: For a better description (if you can't find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org.
Please add you business to the correct address. I reverted your entry.
pitscheplatsch (2025-11-23 14:15:19+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174877188
arjunaraoc (2025-11-20 05:30:44+00:00): Hello Harshavardhan2000A,
As can be seen from this
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/579278975/history, you are vandalising proper villages. If you are mapping landuse, just create a separate  polygon and tag it with landuse=residential.  You need to learn more about the tags and provide a proper remarks about your contributions for effective collaboration, instead of generic comment like this.  It is better you pick up one category like highways, villages,  landuse and focus on that. Please join the telegram channel https://web.telegram.org/k/#@osmandhra for support from other experienced mappers.
Gonéo (2025-11-19 14:57:04+00:00): Merci pour l'ajout de la voie de service. J'ai juste complété la connexion avec l'allée du camping pour qu'on puisse sortir vers le rond-point.
WaF10 (2025-11-19 19:31:22+00:00): Bien vu ! Merci pour la revue.
Reinhard12 (2025-12-30 20:40:15+00:00): Hallo Zolitron,
hier existiert keine Rechtsabbiegerspur von der Zeppelinstr. zum Söltener Landweg. Machst Du das bitte wieder rückgängig?
Gruß
Reinhard (der in der Nähe wohnt)
Reinhard12 (2026-01-12 20:40:56+00:00): Revert durch CS 177154282 (diese Rechtsabbiegerspur existiert nicht)
maro21 (2025-11-22 15:13:52+00:00): Dlaczego zmieniłeś z path na footway?
OlgierdR (2025-11-22 15:45:55+00:00): footway: ścieżka głównie lub przede wszystkim dla pieszych

path: niesprecyzowana ścieżka używana przez pieszych, małe pojazdy lub zwierzęta ...

A to jest po prostu betonowa kładka, czyli 'footbridge', czego najwyraźniej w OSM nie ma. Rower jest małym pojazdem, ale też ten obiekt jest przede wszystkim dla pieszych (i rowerzystów). 
Jeśli coś zrobiłem źle, przepraszam -- proszę wprowadzić właściwą wartość dla "kładka pieszo-rowerowa" i temat będzie z głowy.
maro21 (2025-11-26 14:43:27+00:00): Jeśli ścieżka jest i dla pieszych, i dla rowerzystów to stosujemy [highway=path]. A ta kładka była z tego co wiem projektowana z myślą o rowerzystach, zatem [highway=path] tu najbardziej pasuje, jak jest zresztą już po obu stronach tej kładki.
Domyślne wartości dostępu [highway=footway] to [foot=designated], [bicycle=dismount],
a w przypadku [highway=path] jest to [foot=yes], [bicycle=yes], [horse=yes].
Przeniosłem też incline=6% poza kładkę, bo według twojego zdjęcia spadek jest po zjeździe z kładki w kierunku północnym.
Frans S (2025-11-20 12:41:02+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please read the instructions how to map  settlements and hedges. You mapped buildings and called them place=isolated area. Just use 1 node and add the place=... tag.
About hedges: The instructions ask to map only the outer hedges within settlements. 
Why do you add the tag area=yes to hedges? Hedges are a linear object. Not an area.
Best regards, and keep mapping.
ilias_ (2025-11-21 18:21:58+00:00): Please don't edit in the US and in Somalia in the same changeset 🙏
felipeeugenio (2025-11-19 19:17:05+00:00): Hola. Layer no tiene ningun sentido en este caso. No entiendo mucho la obsesión por usarlo. Con convered basta. Qué estás intentando hacer? la idea es ayudar. Mientras tanto voy a sacar ese tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174862555
NeisBot (2025-11-19 14:47:19+00:00): Hola sandraurbano, bienvenida al proyecto OSM y gracias por tu contribución. 
Para hacer que la colaboración sea más fácil y ayudar a los demás a entender tus ediciones, es mejor agregar una breve descripción de los cambios que hiciste. Los comentarios claros ayudan a la comunidad a seguir tu trabajo y a proporcionar mejores comentarios. Puedes encontrar consejos para escribir buenos comentarios aquí[1].
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi sandraurbano, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-11-19 14:47:23+00:00): Aquí está un comentario de ejemplo basado en tus ediciones del mapa: "Agregué casas, terrazas y edificios, eliminé una designación de reserva natural"
(Auto-translation)
---
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added houses, terraces, and buildings, removed a nature reserve designation"
NeisBot (2025-11-19 14:56:56+00:00): Hi Andreea Vintila, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-11-19 14:56:57+00:00): Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Updated path with intermittent status, removed river waterway designation"
Jordi MF (2025-11-19 20:28:13+00:00): Hola Sandra,

Gracias por mejorar OSM, pero en este caso has modificado una reserva natural y la has etiquetado como si fuera un parque recreativo (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park).

Como ves en la wiki, los parques deben de ser zonas de un área destacable, con vegetación semisilvestre, de uso recreativo y casi siempre dentro de zonas urbanas.

Por lo tanto, revierto esta edición. En OSM tenemos un problema de sobrerepresentación de "leisure=park" que realmente no son parques según la definición de la wiki. Tenlo en cuenta si puede ser.

Gracias de nuevo y buen mapeo.

PD: También he eliminado algunos edificios que habías mapeado con una geometría muy alejada de la realidad. Puedes usa la capa del "catastro" para editar con más precisión, pero a continuación deberás ajustar la geometría a la ortofoto aérea porque el Catastro puede tener un ligero desplazamiento.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
rarad74 (2025-11-20 10:00:40+00:00): Hi.
Maybe you put some comments on your edit. d means nothing...
Frans S (2025-11-19 16:49:57+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not add a tag area=yes to a hedge.
A hedge is a liniar object. Not an area.
And Map more precise by following the hedge lines.
Best regards
pitscheplatsch (2025-11-19 15:29:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM.

This changeset should be reviewed by the local community.

Thanks.

Pascal
ivanbranco (2025-11-19 15:45:19+00:00): Ciao Gianluca, il palazzo comunale è già mappato: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/36893

Inoltre "EP.01 trattino basso" non mi sembra faccia parte del nome. Il campo note poi non è chiaro cosa voglia segnalare. Infine ti ricordo che per convenzione il numero civico non si mappa sulle aree degli edifici in Italia.

Sarebbe meglio chiarire questi problemi prima di procedere con ulteriori modifiche.
pitscheplatsch (2025-11-19 16:06:25+00:00): Grazie mille, ivanbranco.

Per me queste modifiche sembrano in qualche modo automatizzate. Normalmente con l’editor iD non si possono gestire così tanti changeset in un periodo di tempo così breve. Per non parlare poi dei dati inseriti, come hai già menzionato tu.

E il nuovo utente continua diligentemente ad aggiungere nuovi dati e modifiche.

---
Auto-translation
itineris (2026-02-03 12:35:19+00:00): Szia!

Az Ady Endre utcát kiegyenesítetted a körforgalom és a Filó Lajos utca - Kálvin tér között.
A Magyar Közút szerint ezt az ágat átépítették, a Coop felé ívelve.

Neked van valami frissebb forrásod, hogy mégis egyenesen megy?

Üdv:
Ákos
ssummoner1 (2026-02-03 14:22:19+00:00): Szia!

Nem nincs, én csak a körforgalmat rajzoltam be, de látom az ívet egy másik műholdképen, de arról nem rajzolhatok. Őszintén szólva nem tudtam az ívről, amikor fömin saccra rajzoltam. Ha lesz olyan műholdkép, amin látszik és használható rajzolásra, akkor módosítom. Ahogy nézem pár méter van benne, csak sajnos nem rajzolhatom. Tegyek egy jegyzetet, hogy módosítás szükséges?
itineris (2026-02-03 14:27:32+00:00): Ahogy érzed. A Magyar Közút (jogszerűen használható) rétegén is megvan a nyomvonal.
ssummoner1 (2026-02-03 14:33:29+00:00): Akkor megnézem, hogy mit tehetek. Van ezzel egyébként más baj is, amit nem olyan egyszerű visszaállítani, mert egyébként én a körforgalmat vágni szoktam, (és tuti, hogy ez is el volt vágva) legalábbis Úr Balázs buszútvonalas oktató videójában úgy van, hogy az új szabály az, hogy vágni kell, de ahogy látom Vasony egyberakta és nagyon sok útvonalat érint. Azt is rakjam rendbe, vagy azzal mi legyen?
itineris (2026-02-03 14:42:03+00:00): Ez két személyes nézőpont, két gyakorlott szerkesztőtől. A nemzetközi OSM közösségben is előfordul mindkettő megoldás.

Az én személyes véleményem is egyszerűbbnek tekinti egyben kezelni a körforgalmat, különösen a kapcsolat tagságok miatt. De tudomásul veszem, hogy az iD meg széttúrja az egészet, pl. a ki-behajtókra rakott visszafordulási tilalom felrakásakor hajlamos darabolni, és elrontani a kapcsolatokat. Emlékeim szerint Balázs ezért javasolta a darabolt körforgalmakat.

Valamikor majd érdemes bedobni a témát, hogy itthon akarunk-e valami konszenzust.

Szerintem egyelőre hagyd úgy, ahogy van!
ssummoner1 (2026-02-03 18:35:02+00:00): Az ID-ban nem vágáskor történik a baj, hanem amikor össze akarja rakni az útvonalat. JOSM-mel szoktam rendbetenni a körforgalmon lévőket. Egyébként van konszenzus. A matrix szobában volt róla szó, vágni kell.
osmviborg (2025-11-19 16:05:35+00:00): Hej, adressepunkterne i OSM bliver automatisk opdateret fra Danmarks Adresser. Hvis din ændring skal være permanent, er du nødt til at informere Aalborg Kommune om fejlen. Det er kommunen som placerer punkterne. Revertet
rarad74 (2025-11-20 10:15:01+00:00): Hi. Anyone deleted that segment?
ErieCanal (2025-11-21 18:13:38+00:00): Hello,
It does not appear this segment was deleted. I made an alignment to this.
Have a nice day!
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-19 21:32:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1451995167

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Przemysław69 (2025-11-23 13:38:33+00:00): Solved: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175026244

Thanks
ManuelB701 (2025-11-19 16:13:16+00:00): Hallo Mentz,

nur so zu Info: Gleise und Fahrbahnen sind separate Elemente und sind auf OSM auch deswegen separat zu erfassen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:embedded_rails#Motivation_and_Rationale
Das Taggen von bus=yes an Gleisen ist deswegen sinnfrei, weil Busse ja nicht auf den Gleisen an sich fahren, sondern nur auf der Oberfläche, die deswegen als ein eigenes Element dargestellt wird, was hier auch der Fall ist: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42037645

Und auch beim Wunsch von zwei Wegen: Anders als im Neustadtring gibt es hier keine physische Trennung zwischen beiden Fahrspuren und laut OSM-Philosophie sind diese auch nur als ein Weg einzuzeichnen. Dazu eine relevante Entscheidung vor ein Paar Jahren: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/strassen-mit-gleisen-in-mainz/97291

Grüße,
Manuel
ivanbranco (2025-11-20 09:47:57+00:00): Ciao Gianluca, 

anche in questo caso avevi creato un edificio sovrapposto. Inoltre avevi aggiunto il nome del cimitero all'edificio, non all'intero cimitero. Ho corretto.
ivanbranco (2025-11-20 09:45:04+00:00): Ciao, avevi duplicato il cimitero mappandolo come un enorme edificio, per questo motivo l'ho rimosso. L'editor aveva provato ad avvisarti dell'errore, ma tu hai accettato il suggerimeto aggiungendo layer=1, il che significa che l'edificio si trova sopra gli altri edifici (non possibile in quanto non esiste). Quando l'editor ti segnala un errore spesso c'è qualcosa che non va. Aggiungo inoltre che in Italia aggiungiamo i civici come punti, non come attributi delle aree.
Gianluca lama (2025-11-20 09:57:32+00:00): Ciao Ivan,
attualmente sto inserendo la mappatura del Piano di Eliminazione delle Barriere Architettoniche del Comune id Cremona su OSM in qualità di funzionario tecnico dell'ente. Questo è necessario, e utile, al fine di rendere disponibile alla cittadinanza gli edifici e gli spazi pubblici inseriti nel P.E.B.A. e dare la possibilità di inserire ulteriori note e criticità. a tale fine sai come potrei ottemperare a tali finalità senza interferire con le informazioni già inserire nella mappa?
ivanbranco (2025-11-20 10:00:38+00:00): Se volete creare una mappa personalizzata, va utilizzato uMap: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/it/

Se volete importare dei vostri dati nel database di OSM, vanno seguite le linee guida per gli import: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Import/Guidelines
Frank Peng (2025-12-12 06:17:19+00:00): Maybe this road should be tagged as a residential road rather than an unclassified road?
Frank Peng (2025-12-12 06:18:06+00:00): Maybe this road should be tagged as a residential road rather than an unclassified road since it provides access to homes?
ziomio (2025-11-19 16:29:37+00:00): https://www.agenziapo.it/content/cassa-di-espansione-del-torrente-baganza
ziomio (2025-11-19 16:29:20+00:00): https://www.agenziapo.it/content/cassa-di-espansione-del-torrente-baganza
Frank Peng (2025-11-29 05:57:40+00:00): Why is there a road going through a school building and past a football field? I do not see a road going through these in the aerial imagery. What is the source for the addition of this road? Did the road recently get added here on the ground? Thanks.
Frank Peng (2025-11-29 05:59:59+00:00): Or maybe you were meant to tag this road as a foot path or something else?
Frank Peng (2025-12-22 02:00:33+00:00): Also note that roads should not run through buildings unless there is a road tunnel going underneath buildings or a road bridge going over buildings. Sections of road going underneath buildings should be tagged with tunnel=yes, and sections of road going over buildings should be tagged as bridge=yes or tagged with a layer tag.
Frank Peng (2025-12-22 02:02:06+00:00): Also note that roads should not run through buildings unless there is a road tunnel going underneath buildings or a road bridge going over buildings. Sections of road going underneath buildings should be tagged with tunnel=yes, and sections of road going over buildings should be tagged as bridge=yes or tagged with a layer tag depending on the structure.
aTarom (2025-11-29 10:53:28+00:00): Hi, wow, I never imagined this unusual situation could happen. My apologies, I’ll take note.
Frans S (2026-02-02 14:51:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You mapped high-rise buildings incorrectly.
Check this footage on how to map them correctly.

https://youtu.be/Tpi-BTMVo1M?si=LCu1gM_lmESjveU0
Best regards
StC (2025-11-19 17:03:07+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre en prolongeant un chemin au-delà de son point de connexion avec le chemin suivant dans la relation.

Je m'occupe de la réparation.
ThomCJ (2025-11-19 17:13:24+00:00): 🙏 Pardon de ne pas avoir fait attention à cette relation, merci pour la réactivité !
Frans S (2025-11-21 10:14:58+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You overlooked the round and rectangular straw-covered buildings (gray/brown)
Map them as well at future sessions.
Best regards and keep mapping
user_5359 (2025-11-19 20:03:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't forgot to add the main key highway=service. (is corrected).
Tomas_J (2025-12-24 00:39:58+00:00): Zdar, môžeš teda dokreslit a napojiť cestu/chodník, ak sa dá pokračovať?
moonraver (2025-12-25 09:56:48+00:00): Ahoj, poďme o tom kecnúť. Tag noexit=yes znamená podľa wiki, že sa nedá ďalej nijak inak ani peši pokračovať a musíš sa vrátiť naspäť po tej istej ceste, lebo v pokračovaní ti bráni bariéra a tak som to pochopil ja, aj keď som sa o tom radil. Tu síce cesta pre dvojstopové vozidlá po parkovisku končí, ale nenúti ta vrátiť sa naspať po nej aby si z parkoviska vyšiel. Dala by sa tam dokreliť path po tráve a pokračovať popri ceste alebo na cestu,ale nezdá sa mi to najlepšie riešenie. V každom prípade tam nič nebráni aby si si zvolil pokračovanie v teréne ďalej, čo je gro noexit. Ty máš na to aký názor?
moonraver (2025-12-25 10:01:03+00:00): ešte do postatne: For this tag it does not matter, if there is a dead-end sign at the beginning of the street or not.
Tomas_J (2025-12-25 11:22:32+00:00): Hmm. V dokumentácii som našiel "there is no possibility to travel further by any transport mode along a formal path or route", čo imho znamena, že ak tam nepokračuje cesta, chodník (pevný alebo neformálny, vyšliapany), tak tam dávam noexit. Pole, trávnatý pás, neudržiavanu krajinu atď. považujem za "no formal path or route" a za "other obstruction" podľa dokumentácie. Pozriem ale ešte diskusie, či nebol nejaký iný konsenzus, alebo ak máš link , pošli. Dik.
Tomas_J (2025-12-25 11:51:28+00:00): ...tu som nieco nasiel od Acemana, v podstate to robim takto - https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/oCH0gPbND0o/m/o9gkLzZmObsJ
moonraver (2025-12-26 20:28:03+00:00): aceman dal svoj subjektivny nazor, nad tou vodou som tiež premýšlal, že sa dá pokračovať aj po nej, ale nohy más vždy pri sebe, ale čln nie.Wiki tiez jednoznacne nehovori.

ale

When not to use:
This tag should not be used when the way is only a dead-end for one transport mode, but where other modes CAN continue. By way of example don't use it at the end of a motorised road where a footpath continues. 
To CAN je asi dolezite. Cesta odtial môže pokračovať, len je to otvorené, reps. nie je dorobená. Ak nutne chceš, dorobím tam trávovú path popri hlavnej ceste s prípojkou k prechodu cez cestu alebo tam neháme tvoj noexit. Obe sú zrejme správne, záleži na osobnom pohľade, ale pre mňa osobne ak mám niekde noexit, tak je jasné, že sa odtiaľ MUSÍM vrátiť naspať po tej istej ceste,lebo ďalej už sa nedá pokračovať, je tam bariera, plot,atď.
V Trnave som urobil noexit na ceste vedúcej po schodoch na mestské hradby,lebo tam bolo jasné, že keď po tej ceste pojdem, tak na konci je plot so zákazom a nedá sa nijak inak pokračovať, iba skočiť dole z hradieb a zabiť sa :)
Čo navrhuješ z tých dvoch možností? resp. 3tia - tak ako je to teraz.Určite ti nechcem kaziť robotu a pretláčať svoj názor
Tomas_J (2025-12-26 21:18:52+00:00): Nooo, pre mňa je podstatné slovné spojenia "formal path" v dokumentácii ( "there is no possibility to travel further by any transport mode along a FORMAL path or route"). Ak cesta alebo chodník v realite ďalej nevedie, dávam noexit a úvahou či by tam cesta v budúcnosti mohla vzniknúť sa nezaoberam. Asi sa nezhodneme a pomohla by nám asi iba komunita a hlasovanie :). Do toho sa mi nechce, tak navrhujem to nechať, ako veľa iných veci v OSM, vo vzduchoprázdne :).
moonraver (2025-12-27 19:32:41+00:00): zisťoval som, čo je formálna a neformálna cesta podľa wiki: Predstavuje cestu, ktorá je súčasťou oficiálnej evidencie (napr. v katastri alebo dopravnom registri), má právny status, údržbu od štátu...atď., čiže vpodstate by sa dalo povedať, že máš pravdu. Ďalej oficiálna a teda formálna cesta už nevedie,lebo pred parkoviskom podľa ZBGIS konči formálna miestna účelová komunikácia (rátajme k nej aj tú na parkovisku).Ďalšiu path (neformálnu cestu) tam nemá zmysel robiť,takže som to vrátil naspät na noexit=yes a zas som o niečo múdrejší. Dik za diskusiu, mala svoj výnam.
impiaaa (2025-11-19 18:10:20+00:00): 

Hello! Please try to be more descriptive in your changeset comment about what you changed and why. For example, "Tag that roads have a separate sidewalk way." More examples here: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments Thanks!
ziomio (2025-11-19 16:29:04+00:00): https://www.agenziapo.it/content/cassa-di-espansione-del-torrente-baganza
eggie (2025-11-19 17:05:13+00:00): Dag Chris....

Welk bord staat hier vooraan?
Een onderbord bestemmingsverkeer? 
Er staat C12 getagd. Dat is niet motor_vehicle=yes
Is zal er = destination van maken.
olo81 (2025-11-22 19:35:51+00:00): Nazwa drogi do poprawy 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
olo81 (2025-12-22 15:44:28+00:00): Chciałbym prosić o nie przyklejanie obszarów do dróg. 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mania-sklejania-obszarow-z-drogami/76563
Frans S (2025-11-25 11:11:39+00:00): HEllo. Thanks for mapping.
Please map the round buildings as well.
Best regards
MapLover2k19 (2025-11-27 11:47:43+00:00): Sorry I didn't think they were buildings. I think you have completed now so no further edits needed from me? Thanks!
Frans S (2025-11-27 14:44:50+00:00): Yes, I completed them
Best regards.
Frans S (2025-12-06 14:51:55+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Here you mapped a few objects, where both the inside and outside show a shadow. These are no buildings (no roof)

Also, here you did not map the straw covered buildings.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-11-21 10:12:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please use the requested Imagery (Esri)
Round buildings are also to be mapped.
You ignored them here !
Please map them in future sessions as well.
Best regards
Bienson (2025-11-19 23:18:14+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174883474
Bienson (2025-11-19 23:18:13+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174883474
Frans S (2025-12-06 14:49:11+00:00): Hello . Thanks for the mappings.
Your mappings are rather accurate.
However, you overlooked the straw covered buildings, round and rectangular.
Map them also the next time.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-12-06 13:13:04+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not map a building over a highway. Sat Nav systems cannot cope with that. The road ends there.
Just move the road a bit aside.
And, do not cluster multiple buildings as 1 building.
Best regards
paulbrunner (2025-11-29 17:36:08+00:00): Hi Daniele,
thanks for your contributions to OSM!
I had to revert this changeset because it deleted a part of the route and broke three route relations as a result (see details in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175283697), so people couldn't create routes along them anymore.

The last couple of times I rode this (August 2025 in this case), I rode right next to the ex ferrovia, just east of it, basically following the line that comes from the bridge and just going straight south. The track comes from my recorded gpx file. 

Have you seen any bigger changes to the situation on the ground lately? If so, we can figure see about how best to map these.

Thanks again for contributing and happy mapping!
Paul