piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2026-01-24 11:02:38+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177581569
Frans S (2026-01-24 11:00:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177581710
Valerio Cardone (2026-05-12 15:51:34+00:00): Ciao, perché hai rimosso lo svincolo tranviaro "razed" che svoltava a destra da Via Rossini su Corso Regina Margherita?
marmox (2026-05-12 19:14:39+00:00): Ciao, credo perché non rispecchiava più la realtà, però ho capito da poco che i tratti di binari "razed" vanno mantenuti per una sorta di storico.
L'ho ridisegnato.
C'è altrimenti un modo pratico per ripristinare qualcosa di cancellato?
Valerio Cardone (2026-05-13 12:56:02+00:00): Da quel che so si possono ripristinare solo in caso di utenti bloccati (in tal caso vengono ripristinate tutte le modifiche di quell'utente).
ivanbranco (2026-05-13 21:53:08+00:00): Si possono ripristinare elementi di chiunque, non solo utenti bloccati: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Change_rollback
Frans S (2026-01-24 10:59:22+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177581779
Frans S (2026-01-24 10:58:06+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177581788
Frans S (2026-01-24 10:56:24+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177581798
Jordi MF (2026-01-23 00:20:49+00:00): Hola tnt369,

El nombe "Puente 8" para las siguientes carreteras es un poco estraño: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/371604731 y https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372051209

¿Por qué lo has denominado así? Dicho nombre no aparece en el Catastro.

Saludos
user_23740810 (2026-01-23 09:30:05+00:00): Hola Jordi MF,
solo el camino del canal tiene nombre en el catastro. Los caminos transversales que suben y bajan no tienen denominación oficial. Sin embargo, los puentes que cruzan el canal tienen números, por lo que la gente de aquí utiliza el número del puente correspondiente del canal para designar el camino. Cuando alguien me pregunta dónde vivo, le digo «el puente 8 de arriba». Así, la gente del pueblo y de los alrededores sabe exactamente a qué camino me refiero.
Saludos
Jordi MF (2026-01-23 13:12:47+00:00): Gracias por la aclaración. Pues para que la base de datos sea consistente, el nombre del puente deberá de ir solamente en el puente, no a todo el camino. De esa forma, la información será más exacta.

Saludos y gracias!
user_23740810 (2026-01-23 14:48:16+00:00): Lo probaré. Es posible que entonces no se muestre esta información. En ese caso, asignaría la denominación a la calle o línea correspondiente para que se muestre y sea visible la información importante para la orientación.
Saludos
Jordi MF (2026-01-23 14:56:56+00:00): Una de las normas de OpenStreetMap es que no podemos mapear para el render. Es decir, no podemos mapear algo si no existe. Tampoco podemos añadir nombres descriptivos. En este caso, la calle y el camino no tienen nombre. Si ese es el nombre del puente, hay que añadirlo solo en el tramo del puente.

En este buscador o en el de cualquier aplicación que use los datos de OSM, se podrá buscar dicho nombre ('Puente 8'). Así es como la base de datos se mantiene consistente y libre de información que distorsiona la realidad.

Aquí tienes una guía para aprender lo básico sobre OSM: https://learnosm.org/es/

Saludos!
user_23740810 (2026-01-23 16:02:18+00:00): Entiendo tu objeción. Sin embargo, yo lo veo de otra manera. La calle existe y tiene esta denominación (Puente 8) como nombre común que utilizan los habitantes del lugar. No hay otra denominación para ella. Lo que ocurre es que la calle lleva el nombre o el número del puente. Hay puentes hasta el número 15. La gente de aquí se orienta por ellos. Por lo tanto, sería bueno que el mapa también lo hiciera (de forma visible, no solo como entrada en la base de datos).
He introducido el nombre en la sección «Nombre común (si existe)». Me parece bien así. Es el nombre común. Si me lo prohibieran, sería una lástima, ya que se privaría a los usuarios del mapa de información útil y habitual. Si me lo permiten, actualizaría los puentes y las calles de los alrededores.
Lo hago porque ya he recibido comentarios de que la entrada del «Puente 10» no es visible y que esta calle conduce a una bonita zona de senderismo (Ermita de San Cayetano). La indicación de los lugareños de tomar la calle «Puente 10» ha provocado hasta ahora constantes consultas por parte de los usuarios del mapa (senderistas) sobre qué es eso. He tenido que guiar a muchos porque han tomado la calle equivocada.
user_23740810 (2026-01-23 16:17:06+00:00): Y tengo otra observación:
La carretera más grande que discurre junto al canal tampoco tiene nombre en el mapa.
En Google Maps, esta calle se llama «Via Pista» y «Camino del Canal». Ninguna de estas denominaciones es habitual. La gente del lugar la llama «Trasvase». Esa es la denominación común para esta importante calle. Ahora no estoy muy seguro de si puedo o debo introducir este nombre.
Saludos
user_23740810 (2026-01-23 16:29:39+00:00): He encontrado esto en la wiki en inglés de OSM:
"... It is certainly wrong for a mapper to invent a name for an airstrip; however, most names were invented at some point in history, so if someone invents a name and it catches on and a sizeable group of people refer to the thing by that name, then it's ok to be mapped.[5]"

Entiendo que un nombre comúnmente utilizado para una calle puede incluirse tal cual en el mapa. ¿Qué opinas tú?
Saludos
Jordi MF (2026-01-23 16:58:43+00:00): Con el nombre de las calles, hay que seguir el principio de mapear aquello que está sobre el terreno. Si el Ayuntamiento no ha nombrado esas calles o no ha colocado placas, no se deben de poner nombres en calles porque no se puede verificar. Aquí está la normativa genérica sobre qué se puede poner en la etiqueta 'name'. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

En OSM nos basamos en información que debería de poder verificarse de alguna forma. Puedo imaginarme lo beneficioso que sería para unos vecinos que hubiese unos nombres en las calles y que apareciesen en un mapa para poder dar indicaciones. Pero si esos nombres no están indicados de forma física, no deben de añadirse a OSM porque no son oficiales. Desvirtúa la base de datos.

Me da la sensación que numerar los puentes por parte de los vecinos es una forma describir la situación de los puentecitos, y que no son nombres oficiales. Por lo tanto, lo mejor es que añadas el nombre solo al tramo de vía que actúa como puente.

Que los nombres se vean en el mapa o no, no es culpa de la base de datos, que será correcta. El problema es del renderizador que se usa en la página web de OSM. OpenStreetMap tiene muchos más datos que no aparecen en el mapa, pero que sí que están en la base de datos y, por lo tanto, pueden ser usados por otras aplicaciones. Esa es la virtud de OSM ;)

Sobre Google Maps no puedo decir nada, solamente que no podemos usar sus datos porque infringiríamos su Copyright y Google podría denunciar a OSM. De hecho, Google añade información errónea en sus mapas para comprobar si alguien les copia la información. Si hay una calle que se llama Calle Trasvase, adelante, añádela.

Saludos!
user_23740810 (2026-01-23 19:46:25+00:00): Es una pena, me gustaba el proyecto. Lamentablemente, las normas no están redactadas con claridad y se interpretan de forma muy restrictiva. Por lo tanto, retiro mi participación y me doy de baja.
Frans S (2026-01-24 10:55:53+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Don't map the complete spot with a building on it.
Map more accurate please.

Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177581800
Frans S (2026-01-24 10:54:20+00:00): Here you mapped an enclosed open space (cattle yard) as a building
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177581808
Frans S (2026-01-24 10:52:47+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not upload each single building you mapped. Map all buildings and upload them in 1 go.

Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping. 
E: Building  not squared or rounded.



Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177581809
Frans S (2026-01-24 10:50:36+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping. 
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.


Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177581813
Frans S (2026-01-24 10:49:10+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177581826
Frans S (2026-01-24 10:34:19+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings
A: Inaccurate mapping. 


B: Overlapping buildings.
C: Collected adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
D: Connecting nodes to other features.

E: Buildings not squared or rounded.

H: Included a yard of clearing.


Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177581834
Frans S (2026-01-24 10:22:09+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Most buildings here are round huts or rectangular buildings. 
Check the basics how to draw them 
Here you followed the borders of the plot/yard rather than map rectangular or round buildings. 
I removed them, Sorry 

Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177581869
Frans S (2026-01-24 10:18:22+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177581888
Frans S (2026-01-24 09:47:54+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Any reason not to map the balance of the round and rectangular buildings on this spot ?

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177581914
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:52:02+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 15 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/643454271 v5 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/643810228 v1 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/6055279694 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177581997
vasony (2026-01-25 06:18:30+00:00): Szia!

Annyi kérés, hogy vagy a bejáratra, vagy a házra jelöld a címet, mert így dupla. Ha a házon van a (fő)bejáratot még ugyanúgy meg tudod adni, mint most, de cím nélkül.

Köszi, Tamás
toemke (2026-01-25 07:59:24+00:00): Jogos. Mi a bevett jó gyakorlat, inkább a házon vagy a bejáraton legyen a cím? Nyilván ahol több cím van egy épületen (pl. lakótelepeken), ott gondolom célszerű a bejáraton jelölni. De ha egy épülethez csak egy cím tartozik? Illetve ha egy címhez több bejárat is tartozik, akkor csak egyre érdemes címet írni?
vasony (2026-01-25 08:14:41+00:00): Ha csak 1 cím van (panelnél ugye nem mindig), akkor mindkettő helyes, én a házra szoktam, és a többség szerintem így is van jelölve. Legtöbbször ha nem nagy házról van szó, akkor a bejárat nincs is jelölve, így legalább egységesen néz ki.
Bierphysik (2026-01-22 20:40:05+00:00): Beim Hochladen einmal zu schnell geklickt >_<

Waren Wegverfeinerungen basierend auf Hessen DGM1
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:55:08+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13320101823 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bar and Grill"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-30 07:09:16+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177876616
(No visible changes after review)
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-23 05:03:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3850413298
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1154997483

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:55:09+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13354461845 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Insurance agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-30 07:09:17+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177876617
(No visible changes after review)
rarad74 (2026-01-22 21:29:02+00:00): Hi. Please add all necessary tags, not only lines. For parking road you must add type of service road.
dlegg73 (2026-01-22 22:52:14+00:00): Hello, thank you for letting me know and for adding the additional tag. I’ll be more mindful about including these tags in the future.
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:55:10+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13354380948 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "American restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-30 07:09:17+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177876618
(No visible changes after review)
notmyproblem1 (2026-01-23 19:47:00+00:00): "vari" vuol dire? vedo che hai cambiato 4 nodi e 1 percorso
Andrea Del Sarto (2026-02-04 10:24:14+00:00): Buon pomeriggio  notmyproblem1,

la modifica ha risolto una sovrapposizioni di way segnalata dallo strumento https://keepright.at/

saluti
aharvey (2026-01-22 23:49:57+00:00): wouldn't wheelchair=yes be needed to indicate that for this railway stop position you can board/alight in a wheelchair?
literan (2026-01-24 10:33:28+00:00): вы снова вносите лживую информацию в OSM

ждите блокировки
literan (2026-01-24 10:38:51+00:00): правки эти по текстам на могилах откачу, доверия им нет