piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Dawid2849 (2025-09-08 14:33:48+00:00): Cześć! Widzę, że dużo danych dodajesz na podstawie wizji i wiedzy lokalnej, co bardzo się ceni :) Pozwala to na dokładniejsze zmapowanie obiektów. Pozwoliłem sobie jednak lekko poprawić oznaczenia. Skasowałem inscription=brak oraz name. Co do name, to w OSM nie stosujemy nazw opisowych (więcej na ten temat znajdziesz tutaj: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Cz%C4%99ste_b%C5%82%C4%99dy_u%C5%BCytkownik%C3%B3w#Wyja%C5%9Bnienie), a "Kapliczka" zdecydowanie do takich należy. A co do inscription, to po prostu go nie dodajemy, jeśli na obiekcie nie znajduje się żaden napis. 

Pozdrawiam,
Dawid
TinPetreković (2025-09-09 15:33:13+00:00): Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171692765
eggie (2025-09-08 13:20:23+00:00): Dag Olaf... Dat heeft weinig zin zoals je het hebt gedaan. Ik heb de toegangen tot de brug ook ontdaan van oneway=yes

MVG
eggie
Olaf L (2025-09-08 13:24:36+00:00): thanks. ben vrij nieuw met de edits nog, dank voor je hulp! was me niet bewust dat er meerdere edits nodig waren.
TinPetreković (2025-09-09 15:38:16+00:00): Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171693055
MassCartog (2025-09-08 15:06:19+00:00): Hello Welcome to OSM. If the building still exists on the ground (has not been demolished) then you should just remove the tags and keep the building outline.

Could you go back through your changes and correct this? replace or restore building outlines.
TinPetreković (2025-09-09 15:49:56+00:00): Reverting because the wrong road was tagged #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171693595
Dawid2849 (2025-09-08 14:28:12+00:00): Cześć! Znacznika horse=no używamy wtedy, gdy stoi znak zabraniający jazdy konno. Do oznaczania przydatności drogi podczas jazdy koniem używamy znacznika horse_scale. Usunąłem horse=no, a w jego miejscu dodałem horse_scale=impossible (droga nieprzejezdna konno). Więcej o znacznikach przydatnych w jeździectwie możesz przeczytać tutaj: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Je%C5%BAdziectwo

Pozdrawiam,
Dawid
Dawid2849 (2025-09-08 14:29:34+00:00): "jazdy koniem"... jazdy konno oczywiście :P
keepright! ler (2025-09-10 11:16:52+00:00): [Français en dessous]

I think something went wrong at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1427966242: The right primary road should connect to the junction center, not the footway crossing.

I’ve fixed the issue for you: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171730377

----

Je pense que quelque chose a mal tourné sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1427966242: La bonne route principale devrait se connecter au centre de jonction, pas au passage à pied.

J'ai résolu le problème pour vous: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171730377
Op'tRad (2025-12-21 11:55:00+00:00): Hoi,
osm tag start_date. Kijk even hoe een datum invult.  Overigens, april, niet mei.
Groet
TinPetreković (2025-09-11 11:18:02+00:00): Fixed in changeset 

Segments were merged back together and wrong restrictions were removed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171779133#map=14/42.38705/-82.95744&layers=N
NVBW_Edit_Nakaner (2025-09-08 15:32:42+00:00): Hallo,

bist du da ortsunkundig? Dass das 2023er Luftbild keine Bank mehr zeigt, habe ich selber gesehen. Aber das check_date=* an der Bank ist halt verdächtig …

Viele Grüße

Michael
Piagno (2025-09-08 16:31:53+00:00): Stimmt das check date hatte ich auch gesehen.
Da deine Observation, sowie das Luftbild aber neuer waren wie das Erstelldatum der Bänke, habe ich den Fahrradparkplatz hinzugefügt.
Auf älteren Luftbildern wie Bing sieht man auch noch den früheren Zustand.
Piagno (2025-09-08 16:34:36+00:00): Hier sieht man auch das Quelldatum, das ist vom 2024:
https://map.geo.bs.ch/?lang=en&baselayer_ref=Grundkarte%20farbig&tree_groups=Luftbilder%2COrthofotos%2CSatellitenbilder&tree_enable_SI_Swissimage2024=true&map_x=2612737&map_y=1268405&map_zoom=11&tree_enable_OF_TrueOrthofoto2023Mai=false
wildmaps (2025-09-09 16:17:02+00:00): Hi, I accidentally used name:RFI instead of RFI_name. Would this be the correct way?
wildmaps (2025-09-09 16:23:00+00:00): I just checked and I used RFI_name, similar to uic_name, instead of name:RFI, since name:<xx> should only be used for multilingual names.
user_5359 (2025-09-09 17:18:45+00:00): I took the liberty of changing your entry RFI_name to name:RFI, as in addition to the language identifier (in lower case), there is also the spelling with operator (in upper case, also documented with the key note). Using the operator in the prefix is historically correct, especially since the different prefixes of the key name would lead to confusion here.
wildmaps (2025-09-09 17:22:56+00:00): Thanks for your explanation. I didn't knew about that! So maybe there is also the possibiility to make a proposal to deprecate uic_name and uic_ref and modify that to name:UIC and ref:UIC?
user_5359 (2025-09-09 17:53:22+00:00): Personally, I would be delighted if we had more consistent naming rules, but with over 91,000 uses and three projects (according to Taginfo), a change is relatively unlikely.
TinPetreković (2025-09-09 16:10:54+00:00): Reverting because the wrong road was tagged #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171694565
Negreheb (2025-09-11 09:02:41+00:00): Hättest auch einfach access=private setzen können, aber löschen ist in dem Fall auch okay, denke ich :) Ist halt vor 12 Jahren eingezeichnet worden ^^
Sasummsumm (2025-09-12 13:48:12+00:00): Ah ok :D. Aber in dem Fall wird das nicht nur als Parkplatz genutzt vom Besitzer, sondern auch als Holzplatz oder so, schätze ich. Also nicht wirklich ein dezidierter Parkplatz. Dachte mir, wenn der eh keinem was nützt, ist die Info über diese Fläche in der Karte dann eh nicht sonderlich nützlich und kann gelöscht werden.
TinPetreković (2025-09-11 11:27:22+00:00): Fixed in changeset 171779624

Segments were merged back together

openstreetmap.org/changeset/171779624
TinPetreković (2025-09-11 14:59:06+00:00): Fixed in changeset 171779624

Segments were merged back together

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171779624#map=16/42.39032/-82.95843&layers=N
Enock4seth (2025-09-08 14:58:17+00:00): thanks for fixing
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-08 15:42:04+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1427968911

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-08 15:52:21+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1427968911

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
jhaluska80 (2025-09-09 00:03:44+00:00): Old roads rarely are straight up deleted unless they were added incorrectly, or completely razed.

Instead we often do a prefix code to indicate they exist, but were states of disrepair.  This is sometimes useful for hikers and for people to not accidentally re-add them off older aerials.  It does keep it from being used by routers.  So it doesn't have much of a downside.

See here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

In Id (the name of the web editor) it's done through the advanced tag editor.  This would be disused:highway or abandoned:highway.  It also is used a lot of recently demolished buildings (aka demolished:building)

Fortunately, you can revert your change here via the changeset # where you deleted it (aka this one)
https://revert.monicz.dev/

If it's just a really terrible road, consider changing it to a track.

This catches everybody cause the web editor doesn't indicate *it all*.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-08 15:52:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8893662129

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Oso Yogui (2025-09-25 09:34:58+00:00): No es "es:4Fuente".
Es "es:3Agua potable|4Fuente de agua potable"

Me confundí al introducir la etiqueta
TinPetreković (2025-09-08 15:34:54+00:00): Reverting because of a malfunction on revert #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171642349
Snusmumriken (2025-09-08 14:56:29+00:00): There is no road there
Maksim Hradaboyeu (2025-09-09 08:41:46+00:00): Hi! Thanks for the clarification. I'll revert my edit.
Best regards, Maksim.
user_5359 (2025-09-10 12:40:35+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2bnM. What is the mean of the tag demo=yes?
Denis_Helfer (2025-09-11 12:14:11+00:00): Hello,

Sorry, it was a mistake. demo=demolished_building. Corrected.
Thanks for the notice.
Rainero (2025-10-02 22:00:20+00:00): Hallo Tourism_info,

du hast hier shop=confectionery in shop=chocolate geändert. Tatsächlich werden dort Pralinen und Konfekt verkauft. Richtig ist also confectionery, weshalb ich deine Änderung rückgängig gemacht habe. Siehe auch  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Dconfectionery  

Noch eine Bitte: beim Hochladen eines Änderungssatzes bitte immer auch die Quelle der Änderungen angeben. Dafür gibt es im iD-Editor das Feld "Quellen" unter dem "Änderungssatz-Kommentar".

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
chris66 (2025-11-10 14:45:41+00:00): Bahnhof Lengerich (Stadt):

Diesen habe ich vor Ort nicht vorgefunden.

Scheint nicht mehr in Betrieb zu sein!
user_5359 (2025-09-10 15:40:22+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/249123916. What is the mean of the tag none = DE:urban?
Lostmonkey (2025-09-12 13:18:06+00:00): Stien (Linjestreng: 1427985811) slutter ikke til vejen i den vestlige ende. Er det med vilje (kan man ikke gå ud på vejen)?
Bat Wings (2025-09-09 10:15:13+00:00): Ankara Tren Garının Celal Bayar Bulvarına bakan kısmında yer alan yapı ATG ye ait diye biliyorum yani Ankara YHT garının o yüzden Ankara Gar ından kaldırdım yanlışım varsa düzeltin lütfen
TinPetreković (2025-09-09 16:32:28+00:00): Reverting because the wrong road was tagged #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171695583
TinPetreković (2025-09-09 16:37:46+00:00): Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171695794
IrynaStaradub (2025-09-08 14:58:51+00:00): Correct hashtag is #mapbox_missing_roads
NeisBot (2025-09-08 15:06:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-09-14 08:05:36+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/171642161
emvee (2025-09-25 21:10:17+00:00): Ik zag dat brouter niet meer met de fiets over de Catharijnesingel wilde maar bicycle/foot=no op https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7011015 is fout.

Verder geen foot=no en bicycle=no tenzij er echt verbodsborden zijn in plaats daarvan foot=use_sidepath en bicycle=sidepath

Aangepast in https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=172458828
DwarfNebula_ (2025-09-29 07:10:06+00:00): Hey, goed gevonden! Ik heb denk ik niet alle tags goed nagelopen na het samenvoegen met https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35410206. Dit is namelijk waar die tags vandaan komen.
Sammyhawkrad (2025-09-09 06:30:15+00:00): Hello F y, tagging a building with building=yes is enough. Don't add name=Building because the name tag is reserved for actual names (e.g. Jubilee House, Aseda House).

Best,
Sam
Sammyhawkrad (2025-09-09 06:43:41+00:00): Hello Gideon, tagging a building with building=yes is enough. Don't add name=Building because the name tag is reserved for actual names (e.g. Jubilee House, Aseda House).

Best,
Sam
user_5359 (2025-09-08 20:00:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/3342210427 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
silversurfer83 (2025-09-10 18:22:48+00:00): Hi :)

bei Firmen ist es hilfreicher, wenn für die Firma entweder die gesamte Betriebsfläche oder nur ein einzelner Punkt genutzt wird. Den FIrmennamen ohne weitere Details an den Gebäudeumriss zu schreiben ist die schlechteste Lösung.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171641635
eggie (2025-09-08 17:58:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
jcnl44 (2025-09-09 00:40:42+00:00): Bonjour,
Etes-vous sûr que le restaurant La Récré a réouvert ? Il est fermé définitivement aux dernières nouvelles depuis au moins 1 an.

De plus, pour le shop=vacant rajouté, le point existait déjà mais de l'autre côté de l'immeuble vu que l'endroit est traversant, il était placé côté devanture au 14 rue de Jemappes.
ACC5840 (2025-09-08 15:54:33+00:00): I think this should be a cafe actually. Oops. Not sure how to change that...
TinPetreković (2025-09-08 15:26:56+00:00): Reverting because of a malfunction on the revert #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171641942
TinPetreković (2025-09-08 15:30:24+00:00): Reverting because of a malfunction on the revert #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171642130
eggie (2025-09-09 18:43:31+00:00): Dag rweverwijk... Dit zijn geen valide tags.
Ik haal deze weer weg. Wat is je bedoeling/
Je kunt evt hulp vragen op het forum van OSM.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43

Wellicht kan iemand je helpen met je bedoelingen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-09 18:50:50+00:00): reverted by changeset #171701532
eggie (2025-09-09 18:59:42+00:00): De value achter de key seveso= kan volgens mij beter in het UK English.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:seveso

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-09 19:00:08+00:00): Mijn revert heb ik weer teruggedraaid.
rweverwijk (2025-09-09 19:39:31+00:00): Hallo eggie,

Bedankt voor je review, ik volg je reverts niet helemaal meer. Je hebt je revert  terug gedraaid, dus je bent het er toch mee eens dat de tag "seveso": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:seveso toegevoegd wordt?

Ik heb dit voorbeeld gevolgd:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6319179/history/49, aangezien die user 19.000 edits op zijn naam had staan, heb ik dat als betrouwbaar aangenomen.

Ik voel wel met je mee om de values te vervangen voor: seveso=upper

Zal ik die wijziging nog toepassen en doorvoeren voor andere elementen die nog "Hogedrempelinrichting" gebruiken?
eggie (2025-09-09 19:50:24+00:00): Hoi,

seveso als key natuurlijk wel.. 
Dit kwam voorbij bij het valideren, maar eerlijk gezegd ben ik niet zo bekend met die Gevarentags.

Nog eens in de wiki gekeken, maar daar geven ze toch hogedrempelinrichting aan als key.
Dan wel met een kleine letter.
Ik had eigenlijk eerder in de wiki moeten kijken.
Zou gewoon nog die hogedrempelinrichting gebruiken, maar dan met een kleine letter. 

En anders even een vraag voor het forum bij Korte vragen.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/korte-vragen-met-hopelijk-een-kort-antwoord/127479/184
Mapse,
eggie
eggie (2025-09-09 19:50:55+00:00): typo key>value
neuhausr (2026-05-11 14:36:26+00:00): Yikes, some of these imports were waaaaay overnoded! Deleted a bunch on the Sammamish Valley border but a bunch more came up in the iD warnings I didn't have time for
Mashin (2025-09-08 18:14:51+00:00): Hi,
I checked their website and it still says that the restaurant is open. Is there a reason for deleting it?
user_5359 (2025-09-10 15:27:34+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1428005150. What ist the mean of the tag BLDGALTNAM = Sol Duc Ranger Station
?
Omnific (2025-09-10 17:23:59+00:00): Fixed it!
nona mostafa (2025-09-09 12:23:58+00:00): Hi Cyrille37,
Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
I noticed that you've changed the classification of some streets to secondary
For example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422884252, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1319320347, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422952686, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422884264
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422952712, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/163876397, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157794302, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422884266
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142460010, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157794312, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142460021, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/592439451
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/592439449, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1111566067, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1111566065, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1111566064
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1111566066, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142460023, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/592439450, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1111566062
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/590552607, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422884232, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422952706, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422952720
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422884242, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422952679, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1111566063, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157470940
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142460019, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422884257, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422884261, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422884255
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423241631 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157470953
I believe it might be better to revert to the previous classification,
as the current classification may not fully match its actual function. Could you please review these changes and, if necessary, revert them?
Thank you again for your efforts and for helping to improve the map!
Best regards,
nona mostafa
Cyrille37 (2025-09-09 12:33:58+00:00): Hi Nona
I understand that the official classification is not the user prefrered.
I'll do the revert.
Cyrille37 (2025-09-09 12:39:03+00:00): Revert done.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Please feel free to correct me again :-)
nona mostafa (2025-09-10 09:37:09+00:00): Hi Cyrille37,
Thank you for your contribution to OSM, and thank you for your cooperation.
I noticed that you have modified these roads and returned them to the previous classification in this changset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171642928
But it would also be good to adjust the remaining roads, as the road network is still not properly connected."
For example:
osm.org/way/729093103, osm.org/way/163876398, osm.org/way/729093102,osm.org/way/729137956, and
osm.org/way/729137958, osm.org/way/729093101, osm.org/way/7729137957,osm.org/way/729093105, and
osm.org/way/729093106
I would like to suggest that you modify the classification, as well as the classification of other streets.
For example:
osm.org/way/729137961, osm.org/way/729137959, osm.org/way/729137960, osm.org/way/157470939, and
osm.org/way/142460016, osm.org/way/422952702, osm.org/way/157470936, osm.org/way/422952716, and
osm.org/way/422952666, osm.org/way/157470941, osm.org/way/157470926, osm.org/way/893159995, and
osm.org/way/422952705, osm.org/way/157470944, osm.org/way/182282781, osm.org/way/1386974825, and
osm.org/way/1428234260, osm.org/way/1318919006, osm.org/way/1386974833, osm.org/way/1386974834, and
osm.org/way/1386974824, osm.org/way/1330887044, osm.org/way/729093104
Also, when you reverted this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/1309257238
The classification of some streets was changed from trunk to secondary.
For example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1309300369
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/163876398
Could you please review these changes and, if necessary, modify them?
Thank you again for your efforts and for helping to improve the map!
Best regards,
nona mostafa
Cyrille37 (2025-09-10 11:10:05+00:00): Hi Nona,
Sorry, I'm confused because I don't find what to change.

For example osm.org/way/1309300369
and osm.org/way/163876398 are "trunk" not "secondary".

Please, can you make correction, and I promess you to not change these classification in future.
nona mostafa (2025-09-10 12:41:22+00:00): Hi Cyrille37,
Thank you for responding to us quickly, and I am happy to connect with you.
Our team will adjust the roads that need modification to support the network.
Thanks again.
Regards,
nona mostafa
Cyrille37 (2025-09-10 12:55:23+00:00): Perhaps some clarifications in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Morocco/Roads would help for futur.

Like in "primary" and "secondary" sections telling us (contributors) that for some reasons the official classification is overloaded by some usages classifications.

Thanks :-)
nona mostafa (2025-09-10 14:06:04+00:00): Hi Cyrille37,
We will see if it is possible for our team to make such adjustments, and if available, we will adjust them.
Thanks.
Regards,
nona mostafa
Rainero (2025-09-12 20:56:04+00:00): Ah cool, ich kannte bisher nur die am Gasteig :)
Mannivu (2025-09-08 16:17:21+00:00): Ciao, non è necessario usare come nome "Stazione di ricarica e-bike", dato che queste informazioni vengono date automaticamente dai tag inseriti.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171643039
tux67 (2025-09-09 06:34:11+00:00): Hi bicyclett,

nach dem Urteil zur Radwegsnutzungspflicht sind hier jede Menge Radwegschilder demontiert, bzw. durch ein "Radfahrer frei" Schild ersetzt worden. Mapillary Bilder sind teilweise zu alt um diesen Wechsel abzubilden.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.13735011637101&lng=6.293312137226394&z=18.052312321544516&pKey=297201111895115&focus=photo

Da du scheints Task Owner bist - so wie sie ist finde ich die Task mindestens unterspezifiziert. Mit Mapillary Bildern haben wir ein hohes Riskio eine nicht mehr existente Vergangenheit abzubilden (Zumindest was die Beschilderung angeht).
Zumindest für die Stadt Wegberg kann ich sagen - alle Bilder vor 2024 sind für die Schilder im Bereich Radwege nicht aussagefähig.

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171643187