piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-02-24 02:18:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/450914759 v2 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/330822371 v5 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/3378239679 v5

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178967926
NeisReview (2026-03-04 05:33:26+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179031320
NeisBot (2026-02-24 02:30:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/7706315074 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Clothing store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-04 05:33:23+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179332531
(Restore previous tags)
NeisBot (2026-02-24 02:30:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/6063108276 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Kids clothing store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-04 05:33:23+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179048693
NeisBot (2026-02-24 02:39:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/339113361 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Toko Balon"
---
Misalnya, versi teks yang lebih netral dan faktual bisa jadi: "Toko Balon"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-04 05:33:24+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178968312
NeisBot (2026-02-24 02:48:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/339113361 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dekorasi toko"
---
Misalnya, versi teks yang lebih netral dan faktual bisa jadi: "Dekorasi toko"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-04 05:33:24+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179332532
(No visible changes after review)
MappingMore (2026-02-25 10:33:23+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179029425
Baloo Uriza (2026-03-12 16:39:25+00:00): This is just complete slop... you're a professional, maybe consider improving the quality instead of making more work for others?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178968567
grawat_Lyft (2026-03-16 02:23:58+00:00): 
My name is Gaurav, and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you so much for your insight!
There are different approaches on the OSM for adding turn:lanes. Our general approach is to add lanes & turn:lanes tag only when there are visible turn markings on the roads or signs showing possible turns. 
In this changeset: I only saw a marking for a left turn maneuver based on Lyft-owned street view imagery(https://drive.google.com/file/d/1a57mdxpG1dO1tesSeCb6YXEJYxG4bE8e/view?usp=sharing & https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Swoz0UvfHc1upz6Du1JZ-HUdH7E_Kjqw/view?usp=sharing ) so I added it as left|none. Your approach also makes sense that from the rightmost lane vehicles can go straight & right as well. Since I don’t have any signs/markings,I didn't capture it as left|through;right.
I hope this clarifies my edits.
The screenshots will be available for a month. Please let me know if you are unable to view them within this timeframe – I could generate them once again.

Thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Regards,
Gaurav
NeisBot (2026-02-24 03:06:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1482389686 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Toko Balon"
---
Misalnya, versi teks yang lebih netral dan faktual bisa jadi: "Toko Balon"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-04 05:33:24+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179332533
(No visible changes after review)
impiaaa (2026-02-24 18:53:33+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! When you upload changes, please use the changeset comment field to describe what you changed and why. For example, "Added address numbers to buildings" or "Added toilets from survey." Here are some more examples and guidance: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Thank you!
Baloo Uriza (2026-03-12 16:38:43+00:00): I'm at a loss as to how you invented a second redundant road when lane tagging is what is needed there.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178969535
grawat_Lyft (2026-03-16 02:22:25+00:00): Hi, my name is Gaurav and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for your comment.
Based on the most recent Lyft-owned aerial imagery(https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bvxjLNAX0ovVQJdJhGNgUBWZ3-H0wpKN/view?usp=sharing), it clearly shows that there is a drive-through service here, along with parking spaces as per Mapbox imagery(https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Z68mPL4ixPhUeV-jJVS6KXV1adQQr3AN/view?usp=sharing).This indicates that the location provides two different types of services, which is why the edits were made.The policy mentioned on OSM Wiki also explains this distinction between drive-through and drive-in style services:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drive-through
The screenshots will be available for one month. Please let me know if you are unable to view them within this timeframe, and I can generate them again if needed.
Happy Mapping!

Regards,
Gaurav
emvee (2026-03-21 11:07:18+00:00): Thanks for the update!

I did further update it, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ik-zie-in-steden-steeds-meer-autoluwe-gebieden-ontstaan-en-of-uitbreiden-hoe-dit-structureel-in-osm-oppakken/142438/19 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180200622
World_Winner (2026-05-21 05:41:00+00:00): Hi emvee,

Thanks for your kind feedback — I appreciate it.

Glad to contribute and support improving the map. Your input is always valuable in helping keep the data accurate and reliable.
NeisBot (2026-02-24 04:15:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/782821552 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/627269292 v1 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5921523697 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178969655
NeisReview (2026-03-04 05:33:26+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178969903
NeisBot (2026-02-24 04:15:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13594407436 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Spine Care Institute"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-04 05:33:24+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/179125336
NG218 (2026-03-17 00:10:06+00:00): When creating sidewalk chains that have marked and unmarked crosswalks between them, please create those unmarked crosswalks.

And keep to the geometry of the path you're tracing as much as possible.
PedestrianMapping_MapObscura (2026-03-18 04:55:36+00:00): Thanks for the feedback! I’ll make sure to add those where appropriate
NeisBot (2026-02-24 04:24:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 25 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1482397239 v2 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1482393990 v3 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1482403387 v1 | 6 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178969859
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-24 06:37:57+00:00): Hi,

I also noticed this account:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/nogz7

Could you please clarify whether multiple accounts are being used here? 

Also, could you please respond to the comments on the referenced changeset?

Thank you.
Eduardo17172 (2026-02-24 04:46:01+00:00): Elimine la ruta proyectada debido a que este sector ya se ha urbanizado y además junto a Vicente Zorrilla se proyecta construir un parque en el futuro
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-24 10:26:45+00:00): This building geometry issue has already been explained and corrected previously. Continuing to draw adjacent buildings without shared nodes or proper structure creates inconsistent data. Please review the guidelines before further edits.
masoudghorbani (2026-02-24 12:05:58+00:00): ok
felipeeugenio (2026-02-24 14:21:04+00:00): Hola. Por favor, no agregar prohibiciones de virajes en U en las calles en sí mismas. No tienen sentido. 

Por otro lado, a los semáforos hay que agregarles, cuando la calles es bidireccional, el sentido en el que operan con el tag traffic_signals:direction=forward/backward.

Yo ya corregí todo.

Saludos
felipeeugenio (2026-02-24 14:22:44+00:00): Moví los semáforos detrás de los cruces también.
VLD549 (2026-03-10 15:36:25+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. Could you provide a link of some sort that shows the name to be Đi Hồ Chí Minh? I can't find it.

Thank you!
felipeeugenio (2026-02-24 14:17:12+00:00): Hola. El only left es redundante. No hace daño, pero no hace falta agregarlo, ya que es la única opción físicamente viable en ese cruce. Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178970463
NeisBot (2026-02-24 05:12:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13594487445 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dentistry office"

#MapWithoutSpam
MappingMore (2026-02-27 06:09:33+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179114209 , 179114339
fortera_au (2026-02-25 00:04:52+00:00): Hi, the path normally should extend to the roadway (and be joined to the way for that roadway) if they do join up through a kerb.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178970917
Ballpoint (2026-02-25 06:08:44+00:00): Ahh shoot! Thanks fortera! I won't make any more changes like this.
Ballpoint (2026-02-25 06:10:59+00:00): Been told it should have joined as it was before edit, have rejoined path and road again.
FajrAl (2026-02-26 14:22:36+00:00): Boleh dijelaskan arti Blok Kibuyut? Apakah ini semacam RW?
蕉饼电脑 (2026-02-24 08:01:37+00:00): 不要重复添加相同的元素。
cowboyxup (2026-02-24 06:15:01+00:00): Hallo hlfan,
kurze nachfrage: Warum löscht du die nodes highway=bus_stop, die sind an den extakten stellen gemapped, wo die schilder stehen? Was ist dein Gedankengang dahinter?
Happy Mapping
cowboyxup (2026-02-24 06:31:12+00:00): Laut Wiki ist highway=bus_stop nur für nodes und nicht für ways zu verwenden
hlfan (2026-02-24 09:55:06+00:00): Die stops waren sowohl als Punkt als auch Fläche gemappt, teilweise sogar mit widersprüchlichen Eigenschaften.
Wenn du die Schilder als solches mappen willst, wäre es selbsterklärender, stattdessen traffic_sign=* mit dem österreichischen Äquivalent zu DE:224 zu setzen.
cowboyxup (2026-02-24 10:34:13+00:00): Hallo hflan,
das Problem ist, das um alle Anwendungen zu supporten, akuell sowohl die platform, als auch der node mit highway=bus_stop getaggt werden muss. Das ist leider so. Ich hätte gerne auch eine andere Lösung. 
Jetzt ist es auf jeden Fall ein Fehler highway=bus_stop, da dieser immer ein Punkt sein muss. Ohne highway=bus_stop wird es z.B nicht in Carto gerendert. Carto braucht hightway=platform auf der Fläche um die Platform anzuzeigen. Ein Dilemma, das sich aktuell nur durch das doppelte Tagging sowohl als Punkt highway=bus_stop und Fläche abbilden lässt.
hlfan (2026-02-24 12:14:12+00:00): Das ist aber dann eher ein Problem auf der Anwendungsseite - osm.wiki/DE:Taggen_für_den_Renderer is da ja eh recht klar. Wenn es dir primär um die Darstellung geht, dann ist die alternative Setzung von highway=bus_stop vielleicht die beste Lösung.
cowboyxup (2026-02-24 12:40:43+00:00): Es ist aktuell eher Konsens, dass im Moment einfach beides zu taggen ist. Es gibt keinen Konsens, wie sich der Konflikt lösen lässt. Daher wird im Moment diese doppelte Datenhaltung hingenommen (was mir persönlich auch wiederstrebt). 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/public-transport-platform-im-wiki/129847
Das einige was klar ist highway=bus_stop immer nur als Node.
cowboyxup (2026-02-25 10:11:49+00:00): Nur die Änderungen der bus_stop nodes wieder auf den Stand vorher neben der Fahrbahn wiederhergestellt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179026910 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179028371, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179028433
MappingMore (2026-02-25 11:22:09+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179031717
habi (2026-02-24 15:33:17+00:00): Ciao polux98489748956
Is the Tilia Tower (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1482423102) already built or still under construction?
Greetings,
habi
polux98489748956 (2026-02-24 21:56:16+00:00): Hey, the tower is build, about to finish soon.
habi (2026-02-24 15:17:30+00:00): Ciao polux98489748956

You "broke" Lake Geneva in this changeset by adding `tourism=viewpoint` to it and removing the `water` tags.

I reverted your changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178994416 as it seems to me that the park called "Digue Antoine Émile" does not really exist in reality.

Happy mapping,
habi
Marc_ch (2026-02-24 15:48:09+00:00): Bonjour polux,
Merci pour ces contributions.
pour renseigner le nom de la digue, le mieux est de la dessiner :) soit une ligne, soit une surface selon votre envie de précision.
Ensuite pour l'attribut, j'avoue que ce n'est pas trivial à trouver, je pense que "terre-plein" serrait approprié.
En cas d'ajout oü tu es bloqué par le bon attribut, je te conseille de cocher "je souhaite que quelqu'un vérifie".
c'est beaucoup mieux que d'ajouter cela comme parc :)
Salutations,
Marc
polux98489748956 (2026-02-24 21:57:35+00:00): Bonjour a vous, pardon c'est mes premieres contributions, j'essayerais de mieux faire la prochaine fois.
Marc_ch (2026-02-24 22:09:56+00:00): on est tous passé par là :)
si tu as des questions, n'hésites pas.
si tu veux, tu peux m'envoyer un message privé si nécessaire
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-24 14:53:56+00:00): The same building geometry issue continues after prior clarification. Adjacent buildings must use shared nodes or correct structure. Further repetition may require review.
Leo Slager (2026-03-04 23:39:51+00:00): Telefoonnummers graag in het internationale format.
Dus +31 xxxxxx
Sanniu (2026-02-25 07:24:53+00:00): Hi
Look like the new bridge has been opened according to your change.
Can you remove parts of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1177470396 that are not in use now?
moshikosh (2026-02-25 07:31:26+00:00): hi
i do not know about the actual changes.

i only know that the bridge is active and buses are driving there.

i do not know what happend with the old road, so i cant remove it.
thanks
jmarchon (2026-02-25 04:44:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
NeisBot (2026-02-24 06:45:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12474276334 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Fachstudio für Haarentfernung"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Fachstudio für Haarentfernung"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
Nakaner-repair (2026-02-24 10:15:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 178980494 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by SEO spammer (ad Beauty GmbH) due to quality issues and deleting existing features. This changeset also reverts attempts by other mappers to fix the issues.
mueschel (2026-03-07 11:47:21+00:00): Hi,
could you explain what you mapped here? The tags are not used in other places.
mavl (2026-02-25 13:40:00+00:00): Здравствуйте. Добавленные в этом пакете правок дороги highway=track на самом деле не highway=track. Дороги highway=track - это лесные и полевые дороги.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dtrack
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-02-24 16:36:46+00:00): Tôi nhắn lại vào changeset bạn chỉnh sửa ở khu vực Nghĩa Lộ nhé mà vừa nãy mình nhắn nhầm vào changeset khác của bạn, mình là người địa phương ở khu vực Nghĩa Lộ, tỉnh Lào Cai và đã khảo sát nhiều nơi ở khu vực Nghĩa Lộ và những khu vực xung quanh và mình thấy có một số chỉnh sửa của bạn ko khớp thực tế với địa phương. Bạn vui lòng kiểm tra lại nhé và mục tiêu của chúng ta là làm bản đồ chính xác nhất trên OSM. Xin cảm ơn bạn đã đọc!
trial (2026-03-22 20:33:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11677230941 : c'est l'arrêt Blablacar, j'ai fait une passe sur ces 9 quais, voir les notes
Nakaner-repair (2026-02-24 10:15:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 178980494 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by SEO spammer (ad Beauty GmbH) due to quality issues and deleting existing features. This changeset also reverts attempts by other mappers to fix the issues.
Im Fokus (2026-02-24 09:44:49+00:00): depperterweise gleich wieder ein Fehler in der Änderungsbeschreibung.
Also nun aber richtig: 
Spiek, nicht Spieck
ad new cosmetics - ad Beauty GmbH - Experte zur dauerhaften Haarentfernung (2026-02-24 12:44:37+00:00): Hello, I am a new mapper and still learning the rules. I am not a 'SEO spammer', but the owner/representative of this local business (ad new cosmetics) and wanted to add it to the map. I apologize if I accidentally deleted existing features or used too much promotional language – that was not my intention. I will stick to factual data from now on. Could you please give me a hint on what exactly I should improve to avoid being flagged? Thank you!
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-02-24 16:18:44+00:00): Chào bạn, mình là người địa phương ở khu vực Nghĩa Lộ, tỉnh Lào Cai và đã khảo sát nhiều nơi ở khu vực Nghĩa Lộ và những khu vực xung quanh và mình thấy có một số chỉnh sửa của bạn ko khớp thực tế với địa phương. Bạn vui lòng kiểm tra lại nhé và mục tiêu của chúng ta là làm bản đồ chính xác nhất trên OSM. Xin cảm ơn bạn đã đọc!
FUZZY_42 (2026-03-21 19:46:06+00:00): Тег place=suburb лишний и неуместен. И вешать на этот полигон place=neighbourhood тоже не стоит, т.к уже есть точка с этим тегом. 
Откатил.
Colbertson (2026-02-24 09:00:39+00:00): Did you add nodes to a straight way to quiet down a validator warning?
Alexey_ND (2026-02-24 21:08:53+00:00): In this case, yes, that's exactly it.
Colbertson (2026-02-25 07:33:38+00:00): Sometimes validators are wrong, long ways like that are fine in many cases.
Taya_S (2026-02-25 07:39:30+00:00): Hi Alexey_ND,

Please don't perform edits just to satisfy some validator without understanding what the warning is for. Warnings are just tools that *can* be used to reveal data issues. Just because there is a warning, doesn't mean there are any issues. Long ways on their own are not an issue that needs to be systematically fixed.

Furthermore, any such edits should first meet the Automated Edits Guidelines requirement https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Best regards,  
Taya Snijder,  
On behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
Alexey_ND (2026-02-25 18:15:03+00:00): OSM does not enforce a strict, technical maximum length for ways or segments, but practical constraints and community standards dictate optimal sizes for data accuracy, processing, and routing. 
Sections of tens and hundreds of kilometers in length are inconvenient for many purposes. Is this even normal?
The validators is just a tool. I personally decide what to do.
So, what's the problem with this edit?
Sincerely, Alexey.
Colbertson (2026-02-25 19:28:23+00:00): Theres no reason to have extra nodes on a straight section if it really is straight. Or in the case of pipes and ferries there isnt any more data.
The warning makes sense on a road since there might be curves that should be mapped but not here.