piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Kai Johnson (2025-10-22 01:03:26+00:00): That's great that you were able to get to the hill you remembered -- and even better that it led to some good updates to OSM! Sounds like we both enjoy the area, so maybe I'll see you out there!
watmildon (2025-03-21 05:32:34+00:00): Looks good! Thanks for the addition and prodding me on MascotMap
eggie (2025-03-21 06:42:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Je kunt helaas geen routerelaties bewerken met editor iD. Dat kan alleen met editor JOSM.
De routerelaties lijken hier stuk. 

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-03-21 07:28:37+00:00): U39 heb ik gesorteerd.
Daar ontbraken steeds stukjes bij de verdubbeling van de rijbanen.
MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2025-03-21 03:18:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-03-28 19:53:31+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163886875
eggie (2025-03-21 06:48:46+00:00): Beste Gots... 
De relatie van de U44 is niet meer correct.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-21 09:27:56+00:00): Relatie U44 hersteld
user_5359 (2025-04-08 06:57:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/376419062 (one of four objects). What is the mean of the tag LEI = 1315/2021? And please also use lower case letters for the street names!
eggie (2025-03-21 06:46:49+00:00): De relatie van de U43 is nu stuk.
Dat komt omdat editor iD niet met relaties kan omgaan. De volgorden van de routedelen gaat dan verloren.
Kijk naar editor JOSM..
editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-21 07:01:59+00:00): In editor JOSM kun je in het relatie -venster de delen weer op volgorde krijgen. Ook ontbreken stukken in de relatie die er tussen gevoegd 'moeten' worden. 
gr eggie
eggie (2025-03-21 09:20:43+00:00): U 43 relatie hersteld
user_5359 (2025-03-21 19:15:50+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1369823646. What is the mean of the tag STREET_N_1 = 0?
FinalSpeedZ (2025-03-22 07:31:51+00:00): Added names to DLSU Buildings
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
delineatorix (2025-03-21 04:25:36+00:00): Link zur PM: https://www.berlin.de/ba-charlottenburg-wilmersdorf/aktuelles/pressemitteilungen/2025/pressemitteilung.1543039.php
Supaplex (2025-03-22 15:17:25+00:00): 因為描繪非開放授權圖資而回退，請參見 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/124651
累犯將送至 Data Working Group
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163887808
Supaplex (2025-03-22 15:17:19+00:00): 因為描繪非開放授權圖資而回退，請參見 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/124651
累犯將送至 Data Working Group
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163888019
Supaplex (2025-03-22 15:17:14+00:00): 因為描繪非開放授權圖資而回退，請參見 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/124651
累犯將送至 Data Working Group
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163888118
NeisReview (2025-03-21 07:15:10+00:00): #NameChanges

Hi, welcome to OSM.

In the past 12 hours, you have made numerous name changes across various changesets. This included modifying names as well as removing other name:*. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.

You can find an overview of the recent changesets at the following link: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=22656113
NeisReview (2025-03-28 20:42:00+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164001830
NeisReview (2025-03-21 07:15:03+00:00): #NameChanges

Hi, welcome to OSM.

In the past 12 hours, you have made numerous name changes across various changesets. This included modifying names as well as removing other name:*. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.

You can find an overview of the recent changesets at the following link: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=22656113
NeisReview (2025-03-28 20:42:04+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164001830
dknelson9876 (2025-03-25 03:31:54+00:00): Hi Joseph, what was your logic behind upgrading North Temple Frontage to tertiary? Looking at it on Bing Streetside, it looks like there's barely room for two semi trucks to pass at points. Compared to the roads around it, I expect that it gets very little traffic, and the majority of traffic is just using the 5600 W exit
Joseph R P (2025-03-26 04:12:23+00:00): The frontage road serves as an alternate route from the International Center and links to I 80. If it were to continue to another minor road without providing a secondary access point to the Interstate then I wouldn't have considered upgrading it to tertiary.
NeisBot (2025-03-21 05:06:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
NeisReview (2025-03-28 20:00:20+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164224450
NeisReview (2025-03-21 07:09:47+00:00): #NameChanges

Hi, welcome to OSM.

In the past 12 hours, you have made numerous name changes across various changesets. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.
NeisReview (2025-03-28 20:40:47+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/16402933
NeisReview (2025-03-21 07:10:42+00:00): #NameChanges

Hi, welcome to OSM.

In the past 12 hours, you have made numerous name changes across various changesets. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.
NeisReview (2025-03-28 20:40:34+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/16402933
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-21 10:17:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163898286 where the changeset comment is: revert name vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-21 10:17:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163898286 where the changeset comment is: revert name vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-21 10:17:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163898286 where the changeset comment is: revert name vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-21 10:17:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163898286 where the changeset comment is: revert name vandalism
Supaplex (2025-03-22 15:17:09+00:00): 因為描繪非開放授權圖資而回退，請參見 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/124651
累犯將送至 Data Working Group
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163888911
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-21 10:17:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163898286 where the changeset comment is: revert name vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-21 10:17:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163898286 where the changeset comment is: revert name vandalism
Supaplex (2025-03-22 15:17:04+00:00): 因為描繪非開放授權圖資而回退，請參見 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/124651
累犯將送至 Data Working Group
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163888940
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-21 10:17:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163898286 where the changeset comment is: revert name vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-21 10:17:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163898286 where the changeset comment is: revert name vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-21 10:17:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163898286 where the changeset comment is: revert name vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-21 10:17:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163898286 where the changeset comment is: revert name vandalism
NeisBot (2025-03-21 05:39:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
NeisReview (2025-03-28 19:59:49+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164224432
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-21 08:06:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163893307 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed name changes in Spain
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-21 08:06:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163893307 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed name changes in Spain
NeisReview (2025-03-21 07:10:48+00:00): #NameChanges

Hi, welcome to OSM.

In the past 12 hours, you have made numerous name changes across various changesets. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-21 08:06:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163893307 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed name changes in Spain
NeisReview (2025-03-21 07:09:54+00:00): #NameChanges

Hi, welcome to OSM.

In the past 12 hours, you have made numerous name changes across various changesets. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-21 08:06:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163893307 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed name changes in Spain
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-21 08:06:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163893307 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed name changes in Spain
tastrax (2025-03-22 09:49:10+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-21 08:06:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163893307 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed name changes in Spain
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-21 08:06:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163893307 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed name changes in Spain
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-21 08:06:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163893307 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed name changes in Spain
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-21 08:06:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163893307 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed name changes in Spain
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-21 08:06:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163893307 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed name changes in Spain
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-21 08:06:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163893307 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed name changes in Spain
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-21 08:06:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163893307 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed name changes in Spain
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-21 08:06:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163893307 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed name changes in Spain
uknown-gryphus (2025-03-28 18:46:05+00:00): Hi, I'm curious, why was the road surface deleted? It is correct to the best of my knowledge
totera (2025-03-21 12:14:41+00:00): Hi Neonkaaaaa, why do you move the nodes like this? The shops are inside the buildings, not on their edges!
Neonkaaaaa (2025-03-21 13:30:41+00:00): Hi!
To highlight their only dedicated entrances.
ivanbranco (2025-03-21 13:49:34+00:00): Entrances and shops are two distinct elements. The entrances can be mapped as entrance=shop. I would leave the shop nodes at the center of their area (as said totera, inside the building).
Neonkaaaaa (2025-03-21 13:55:18+00:00): The shops are points on the map, not areas. So, technically they are inside the building. I see no reasons to add additional elements. I would prefer to have it like I did.
totera (2025-03-23 23:02:58+00:00): In the real world shops are not points, because they have an extension. If we have a reliable source for their extension we can map them as areas; if we don't have it, we map them as points.
As you yourself recognize shops are inside buildings, therefore the shop nodes should go inside buildings.
You say that you do not want to add additional elements but you are mixing shops and entrances, here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163411316) you have even duplicated a shop just because it has an entrance on another street.
Neonkaaaaa (2025-03-24 06:30:05+00:00): Could you please clarify what do you want from me?

There is an issue - no entrances. Thus, I have to jump around buildings searching for a proper spot to enter. I fix it with minimal efforts. And it seems it is allowed by rules.

And it also seems no one else would like to fix it.

So, what do you want from me?
ivanbranco (2025-03-24 07:42:02+00:00): >So, what do you want from me?

totera replied already, "you are mixing shops and entrances". See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

There are two real-world features: an entrance and a shop. There should be two OSM elements: an entrance and a shop.

totera has been active in Ancona for 15 years, and most of the shops you are moving around were mapped by him. Mapping shops this way in Ancona is the de-facto style, so why change it? Especially when a local user is asking you not to?Let’s keep it civil and collaborative. We appreciate your edits, but please also consider local input.
Neonkaaaaa (2025-03-24 07:48:14+00:00): Thank you for the clarification.
totera (2025-03-25 08:03:34+00:00): You, like any other mappers, are expected to map correctly.
You have not "fixed" anything but rather introduced position errors because the shops are not on the edge but inside the buildings.
Moreover, mapping shops inside buildings is not my personal style or an Ancona style, but it is used all over the world, so you should "fix" the entire world map.
Anyway if you are convinced that there is a rule that allows mapping in this way please tell us where it is (on the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Shops you can read It is more common to use simple nodes for shops *inside* larger buildings, and you can find https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:entrance%3Dshop)
totera (2026-07-16 09:29:04+00:00): Unfortunately, I must point out that not only you are persisting (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164078931 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180347901) with the behaviour we asked you to stop, but I've noticed that, contrary to what you stated - that you need to know where the entrances are - you haven't moved the shops to the correct entrance location, but simply to the closest edge of the building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164023524
You're filling the map with incorrect information, please stop.
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-21 08:06:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163893307 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed name changes in Spain
NeisReview (2025-03-21 07:11:02+00:00): #NameChanges

Hi, welcome to OSM.

In the past 12 hours, you have made numerous name changes across various changesets. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 19:03:17+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12686412123/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Mokka2024 (2025-04-30 14:58:24+00:00): IT is a shop which sells art and hand crafted objects
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-04 07:19:43+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dgift ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 21:55:48+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3196181694/history has shop = bike that was added in this edit
shop=bike ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=motorcycle ? Or is it about bicycles?

Should we document this shop value as distinct, valid and useful?
map-maker-pro (2025-03-26 09:19:41+00:00): Hi, egeaero! Could you share please the source of some edits? You added access=no to Fatih Sultan Mehmet Köprüsü. Is this bridge closed for drivers?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163891658
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-07-15 17:27:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 185798781 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fiction added in error by OSMNAXA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20923
martinst (2025-03-21 07:52:40+00:00): Way 35818671: highway=cycleway ist nur bei einem reinen Radweg richtig. 
Siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dcycleway#Eigenst%C3%A4ndige_Wege
Evros1969 (2025-03-21 08:55:35+00:00): In Ordnung Ich Habe es Ersezt mit Fußweg plus Fahrad yes
martinst (2025-03-21 14:42:14+00:00): Schaut gut aus, Dankeschön!
Evros1969 (2025-03-21 15:49:26+00:00): Ok!
nevw (2025-03-21 11:49:47+00:00): Your seo spam has been reverted.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-22 04:49:41+00:00): See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17432
Patchi (2025-04-04 19:17:43+00:00): Bonjour planet-ski,

Comme déjà indiqué dans le groupe de modifications 164317127 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164317127) l'ajout de zones résidentielles nommées pour indiquer le nom d'une station de ski est un détournement manifeste du tag landuse=residential (voir la page wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential). Rajouter de nouvelles zones résidentielles au même endroit que des zones résidentielles déjà existantes n’est pas non plus une bonne pratique. Je vous invite une fois de plus à venir en discuter sur le forum OSM France (https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/detournement-du-tag-landuse-residential-comme-station-de-ski/32838/7) avant de faire de plus amples modifications de ce genre, ceci afin de clarifier votre besoin et évaluer les solutions possibles à votre besoin avec les contributeurs de la communauté.

Si vous êtes affiliés au site https://www.ski-planet.com, je vous invite également à lire en détails les droits d'auteurs et licence pour l'utilisation de la carte OpenStreetMap osm.org/copyright car les plans affichés sur le site https://www.ski-planet.com ne respectent pas les conditions indiquées puisqu'il n'y a aucune indication visible de type "© OpenStreetMap contributors" sur les cartes disponibles sur ce site. Vous devez également préciser clairement que les données sont disponibles sous la licence ODbL. Vous pouvez mentionner ceci avec un lien hypertexte vers https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright.

Merci d’avance,

Patchi
Patchi (2025-04-04 19:17:45+00:00): Bonjour planet-ski,

Comme déjà indiqué dans le groupe de modifications 164317127 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164317127) l'ajout de zones résidentielles nommées pour indiquer le nom d'une station de ski est un détournement manifeste du tag landuse=residential (voir la page wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential). Rajouter de nouvelles zones résidentielles au même endroit que des zones résidentielles déjà existantes n’est pas non plus une bonne pratique. Je vous invite une fois de plus à venir en discuter sur le forum OSM France (https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/detournement-du-tag-landuse-residential-comme-station-de-ski/32838/7) avant de faire de plus amples modifications de ce genre, ceci afin de clarifier votre besoin et évaluer les solutions possibles à votre besoin avec les contributeurs de la communauté.

Si vous êtes affiliés au site https://www.ski-planet.com, je vous invite également à lire en détails les droits d'auteurs et licence pour l'utilisation de la carte OpenStreetMap osm.org/copyright car les plans affichés sur le site https://www.ski-planet.com ne respectent pas les conditions indiquées puisqu'il n'y a aucune indication visible de type "© OpenStreetMap contributors" sur les cartes disponibles sur ce site. Vous devez également préciser clairement que les données sont disponibles sous la licence ODbL. Vous pouvez mentionner ceci avec un lien hypertexte vers https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright.

Merci d’avance,

Patchi
eggie (2025-03-21 10:05:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community