piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2024-05-25 08:29:24+00:00): CHÀO

Bạn có thể giải thích bạn đang làm gì trên hòn đảo do Trung Quốc kiểm soát không? Tôi không nghĩ có sự thay đổi quyền kiểm soát nơi này. Dự án OpenStreetMap là một dự án hợp tác lập bản đồ những thứ tồn tại trong thực tế. Sẽ không ổn nếu chỉ lập bản đồ mọi thứ trong tưởng tượng.
Thay đổi của bạn được hoàn nguyên trong bộ thay đổi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151717628
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151577183
Supaplex (2024-05-25 08:28:37+00:00): Hi

Can you explain what are you doing on China's control island? I don't think there is a change of control over this place. The OpenStreetMap project is a collaborative project which maps things that exist in the real. It is not ok to map things only in images.
Your change is reverted in the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151717628
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151577234
Supaplex (2024-05-25 08:29:19+00:00): CHÀO

Bạn có thể giải thích bạn đang làm gì trên hòn đảo do Trung Quốc kiểm soát không? Tôi không nghĩ có sự thay đổi quyền kiểm soát nơi này. Dự án OpenStreetMap là một dự án hợp tác lập bản đồ những thứ tồn tại trong thực tế. Sẽ không ổn nếu chỉ lập bản đồ mọi thứ trong tưởng tượng.
Thay đổi của bạn được hoàn nguyên trong bộ thay đổi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151717628
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151577234
Intrinsical (2024-05-20 12:31:36+00:00): changeset comment: aligned some roads to imagery; extended a track according to imagery; separated a guidepost from a road (as it had made the road veer of from where it actually was); made gate connected to the path it crossed; aligned a footway to imagery and heatmap; added a driveway; adjusted parking area to imagery
Supaplex (2024-05-25 08:28:31+00:00): Hi

Can you explain what are you doing on China's control island? I don't think there is a change of control over this place. The OpenStreetMap project is a collaborative project which maps things that exist in the real. It is not ok to map things only in images.
Your change is reverted in the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151717628
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151577289
Supaplex (2024-05-25 08:29:16+00:00): CHÀO

Bạn có thể giải thích bạn đang làm gì trên hòn đảo do Trung Quốc kiểm soát không? Tôi không nghĩ có sự thay đổi quyền kiểm soát nơi này. Dự án OpenStreetMap là một dự án hợp tác lập bản đồ những thứ tồn tại trong thực tế. Sẽ không ổn nếu chỉ lập bản đồ mọi thứ trong tưởng tượng.
Thay đổi của bạn được hoàn nguyên trong bộ thay đổi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151717628
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151577289
Supaplex (2024-05-25 08:28:12+00:00): Can you explain what are you doing on China's control island? I don't think there is a change of control over this place. The OpenStreetMap project is a collaborative project which maps things that exist in the real. It is not ok to map things only in images.
Your change is reverted in the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151717628
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151577357
Supaplex (2024-05-25 08:28:19+00:00): CHÀO

Bạn có thể giải thích bạn đang làm gì trên hòn đảo do Trung Quốc kiểm soát không? Tôi không nghĩ có sự thay đổi quyền kiểm soát nơi này. Dự án OpenStreetMap là một dự án hợp tác lập bản đồ những thứ tồn tại trong thực tế. Sẽ không ổn nếu chỉ lập bản đồ mọi thứ trong tưởng tượng.
Thay đổi của bạn được hoàn nguyên trong bộ thay đổi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151717628
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151577357
Supaplex (2024-05-25 08:27:43+00:00): Hi

Can you explain what are you doing on China's control island? I don't think there is a change of control over this place. The OpenStreetMap project is a collaborative project which maps things that exist in the real. It is not ok to map things only in images. 
Your change is reverted in the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151717628
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151577392
Supaplex (2024-05-25 08:27:46+00:00): CHÀO

Bạn có thể giải thích bạn đang làm gì trên hòn đảo do Trung Quốc kiểm soát không? Tôi không nghĩ có sự thay đổi quyền kiểm soát nơi này. Dự án OpenStreetMap là một dự án hợp tác lập bản đồ những thứ tồn tại trong thực tế. Sẽ không ổn nếu chỉ lập bản đồ mọi thứ trong tưởng tượng. 
Thay đổi của bạn được hoàn nguyên trong bộ thay đổi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151717628
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151577392
Supaplex030 (2024-05-20 14:23:40+00:00): #bordsteinkantenlinienrichtung korrigiert, siehe https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=9508237
mavl (2024-06-22 11:38:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 153025651, 153025658, 153025634, 153025596, 153025615, 153025678 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources].
ika-chan! (2024-05-31 18:52:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1284857153 is fenced off in real life.
kapazao (2024-05-20 16:40:02+00:00): I have asked you to be more precise with your editions and you have not answered or made any changes in the way you edit.
I cannot accept how you map ways with that really bad geometry. Every user must go after your edits fixing your mistakes.
It seems you are importing it from Strava and you have no care about OSM data.
I am sorry but I need to report you because you do not fix your edits.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151578840
Jordi MF (2024-05-20 14:59:36+00:00): Hola IWBRABANT,

Gracias por mejorar OSM, pero en este caso los nombres no pueden estar repetidos en un nodo y en una vía. Tampoco deben aadirse nombres descriptivos en la etiqeuta "name".

Lo corregiré. Saludos.
IWBRABANT (2024-05-23 11:39:35+00:00): Gracias
os-emmer (2025-03-26 15:46:33+00:00): Hi Joohee Choi,
I found this object that you added:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1284857507
What is this? Is it a dublicate of this road?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172414923
ZeLonewolf (2025-08-19 01:36:11+00:00): This changeset was reverted due to presence of NO TRESPASSING sign

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170645170
NLBRT (2024-05-20 19:45:13+00:00): Hi, could you be please a bit more descriptive with the changes you have made?
VictorIE (2024-05-20 20:18:09+00:00): The bridge was re-furbished and re-opened today. Most of what I've done is add to the tagging of the bridge and approach roads.
NLBRT (2024-05-22 07:34:21+00:00): Oh, thanks for the info! I was checking it out on OsmCha and was a bit suspicious of the "crude"-looking ways, that's why I thought of asking about it.
DD1GJ (2024-05-20 14:55:03+00:00): Eintrag gelöscht, da er an dem gesamten Gebäudekomplex angebracht war, anstatt einen eigegen Punkt anzulegen. Zudem ist hier Kurfürstendamm 30, während sich das Büro lt. https://limousine-service.com/ in der Kurfürstenstraße Kurfürstenstr. 51 befinden.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 07:03:28+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11919760007/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-18 14:15:09+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11919761711/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
HirschKauz (2024-05-20 17:44:17+00:00): Hi! 
- opening_hours=* muss nach den OSM-Regeln formatiert sein, sonst kann das nicht interpretieren werden und ist wertlos - siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours 
- auch heißt das Café sicher nicht"..... (nur Sonntags)" ;-) 

Ach und noch eine "Kleinigkeit" Als Changeset-Kommentar wäre zB "Café eingetragen" informativer für deine Mit-Mapper als "Update" 

Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151580998
dypa (2024-06-02 13:10:29+00:00): При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra

Пожалуйста при внесении следующих правок используйте теги (Размеченный (нерегулируемый) пешеходный переход)
crossing=uncontrolled
crossing:markings=zebra
mavl (2024-06-22 11:38:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 153025651, 153025658, 153025634, 153025596, 153025615, 153025678 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources].
mavl (2024-06-22 11:38:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 153025651, 153025658, 153025634, 153025596, 153025615, 153025678 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources].
BlueButterfly (2024-06-17 19:12:48+00:00): Hello samuelzammit,

I wanted to bring a few things to your attention regarding your edits in Malta. In particular, it looks like you may have mistakenly deleted a section of trunk highway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514527737) but I believe the intention was to remove an old bus stop node. I also noticed that you changed the classification of a highway segment from highway=tertiary to highway=primary (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29286673) resulting in a short segment of primary highway which is disconnected from the greater primary network. Primary highways typically link larger towns while tertiary highways are typically used to link smaller towns and villages (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Roads).

I have already updated these areas, but thought it might be helpful to point this out as you seem to be a new member of the OSM community. You might also find https://learnosm.org/ useful, as it has a lot of great editing tips. The country wiki page for Malta also has some helpful policy that is specific to Malta (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Malta).
Hopefully these resources can be of help to you, and I hope you have a wonderful day!
samuelzammit (2024-06-17 19:27:58+00:00): Hi,

The edits in the roads were unintentional. I believe this was one of my first edits using JOSM and must have mistakenly selected those nodes. My apologies for the mistake, and thanks for reverting the changes.

The wiki page on Malta contains the list of bus routes. I am working on updating these on OSM (as they haven't been updated in about 4 years) and can update the wiki page accordingly. So far, I have updated all the bus routes in Gozo (the smaller northern island) and will update the routes in Malta soon. If you have any feedback on this, it will be greatly appreciated.

The wiki page also states that the bus stops need updating:
- full bus stop name (done for both Malta and Gozo, with info taken from the Malta Public Transport website - https://www.publictransport.com.mt/)
- ref (in progress, currently done for a handful of bus stops only)
- adding stop_positions for each bus stop (in progress, currently done for a handful of bus stops only).
BlueButterfly (2024-06-20 22:19:50+00:00): Hi samuelzammit,
Thank you for the fast response and for addressing the situation with the road edits.
Your work on updating the bus routes and stops is invaluable, especially given that they haven't been updated for a few years. As for feedback, I would recommend reviewing/validating your edits before uploading to ensure no unintentional deletions or classification changes have been made. It looks like you have been doing so in your recent changesets which is greatly appreciated.
Thanks again for your hard work and dedication to improving OSM!
LockOnGuy (2024-05-20 18:22:04+00:00): Source please?
desertivy (2024-05-21 11:12:48+00:00): https://send.zcyph.cc/download/37b9046dce30483b/#pL2FOu93pSraKgjjKf_CfA

missed this street when I added street numbers to this neighborhood.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-20 14:00:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11919838769

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Baloo Uriza (2024-05-20 18:20:42+00:00): Not quite but close; most of these aren't even loosely following buildings.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151581806
Warin61 (2024-06-04 05:15:19+00:00): Hi,
Stop positions must be on a train line way .. and be part of, connected to, that way. 
Node 8382297622 Keon Park is not on a train line... see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8382297622
SomeoneElse (2024-05-20 14:28:44+00:00): Thanks!
Jordi MF (2024-05-20 14:46:30+00:00): Hola Ferran,

Gràcies per millorar les dades d'OSM, però voldria matisar i preguntar-te l'edició que has realitzat.

Per què has canviat l'etiqueta de la wikipedia? Les normes d'OpenStreetMap que apareixen a la wiki, indiquen que que eixa etiqueta ha d'estar en l'idioma local. Tenint en compte que Manises forma part dels municipis de predomini lingüístic valencià, el valor correcte és el que ja hi havia.

D'altra banda, fa 21 dies, l'usuari "Hugoren Martinako" va actualitzar la població de Manises amb dades de 2023 segons l'INE, per tant, és una dada més actualitzada que la que has afegit.

Amb tot això, recuperaré les dades anteriors.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-20 14:20:18+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11919885605

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
drmicrosolutions (2024-05-20 15:27:37+00:00): Popieram. Prośba o skrócenie opisu. Dziękuję.
NorthCrab (2024-05-21 08:07:27+00:00): Hej! Opis jest dłuższy dla nowych użytkowników bo zawiera więcej informacji :-) Która część według ciebie mogła by być odchudzona? Pozdrawiam!
drmicrosolutions (2024-05-21 09:48:22+00:00): Poprawiłem opis. Prośba o sprawdzenie, czy jest już OK. Z góry dziękuję.
NorthCrab (2024-05-30 09:35:40+00:00): Tak! Po prostu paczkomaty są na tyle wyjątkowe że nazwa generuje się na nich automatycznie. Numer paczkomatu (jeśli znany) można przekazać w polu ref/numer referencyjny. Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-20 14:20:18+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11919893715

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
drmicrosolutions (2024-05-20 15:33:00+00:00): Popieram. Prośba o skrócenie opisu. Dziękuję.
Friendly_Ghost (2024-05-25 16:15:30+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151818663. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war for the reasons.
woodpeck (2024-05-20 16:12:12+00:00): Dear DT29, in this changeset you have reverted a couple of waterways inside the area marked as "Mojave Desert Land Trust". Your changeset comment does not sufficiently explain why those waterways should not exist so I have reverted your edit. 

Also, you have deleted a couple of trails inside the area when their existence seems perfectly clear on aerial imagery; if these really do not exist at all, then you should have explained that in your changeset comment. The fact that something is private property is not sufficient reason for deleting it from OSM; instead, you can mark the respective objects as "private access" in the editor which keeps them on the map, but outside of what popular hiking apps would recommend.

(DWG Ticket#2024052010000498)
woodpeck (2024-05-20 16:13:26+00:00): (When I wrote "reverted a couple of waterways" above, what I meant was "removed")
DT29 (2024-05-20 16:52:14+00:00): Thank you for this. 

Illegal OHV has become rampant in this area. It is the belief that washes are best for traveling in the Desert, However this property has several critically listed biological species. These routes that were removed from the map were done to protect the species. The aerial imagery that is seen is historic routes that have been restored. Signage  on ground has not been enough to denture people from not using these and labeling these Private will not help with the non subscription users such as ONX. The free versions of this app do not show private boundaries.
woodpeck (2024-05-20 17:25:26+00:00): This is really something that we need to take up with the app developers then; the fact that OSM data is misinterpreted by an app must not lead to falsifying OSM. (Just to be clear, I was not talking about boundaries, but instead adding the "access=private" tag to anything marked as a trail. Of course if people drive their OHV along something that's not even marked as a trail that's another issue... still, knowledge about where these washes are can save lifes in an emergency, and they should not be deleted from OSM just because someone cannot handle the information responsibly.)
woodpeck (2024-05-20 17:26:54+00:00): In case you hadn't seen this, the US local chapter of the OpenStreetMap Foundation has an initiative going that deals with conflict points of recreation and land management in OSM, here https://openstreetmap.us/our-work/trails/
DT29 (2024-05-20 17:33:33+00:00): Thank you I will look into this! 

I understand the washes are important due to safety reasons. 

Would we be able to remove these routes that are not washes?
uknown-gryphus (2024-06-02 05:51:14+00:00): Hi, this way is not "superfluous", I had even left a note stating as much. Please do NOT edit features with out checking the notes field first.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151583232
Friendly_Ghost (2024-05-25 16:15:23+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151818663. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war for the reasons.
BubbaJuice (2024-08-05 18:34:35+00:00): Hello Cooper,

Are these railroads real?

Thanks,
BubbaJuice
euroPathfinder (2024-05-21 06:16:00+00:00): Hi Hb-,

Danke für Deine Beiträge. Sehr spannend zu sehen wie die Abwasserwirtschaft organisiert ist! Da Du deutschlandweit aktiv bist und Dich als Armchair-Mapper bezeichnest frage ich mich, wie Du diese unterirdischen Läufe basierend auf "local knowledge" eintragen konntest. Ich wohne selbst in der Region und würde mir nicht zutrauen, den Verlauf rein nach überirdischen Beobachtungen richtig eintragen zu können. Hast Du vielleicht noch eine andere Quelle verwendet, die mit der ODbl kompatibel ist? Falls ja hätte ich daran großes Interesse, dann könnte ich weitere Abwassersysteme in der Region eintragen. 

Beste Grüße
euroPathfinder
Hb- (2024-05-21 16:31:35+00:00): Es war eine ganze Menge "Best Guess" dabei, insbesondere beim Ablauf des Heuwiesbach aus dem RRB in der Ortsmitte. Lokale Quellen:
http://www.walle.de/w_bautagebuch_ingenieurbau_Hauptsammler_Bliesmengen-Bolchen_2_BA.php
http://www.walle.de/w_bautagebuch_ingenieurbau_Hauptsammler_Bliesmengen-Bolchen_1_BA.php
https://www.bliesmengen-bolchen.de/sehenswertes/faehrmannsplatz/
https://geoportal.saarland.de/geofachdaten/mapserv?map=/mapfiles/geofachdaten/Internet/bplan/mandelbachtal_II/bliesmengen_bolchen.map&VERSION=1.1.1&REQUEST=GetFeatureInfo&SERVICE=WMS&WIDTH=937&HEIGHT=642&SRS=EPSG:31466&BBOX=2581280.3871858465,5445851.494742064,2582011.6128141535,5446352.505257936&FORMAT=image/png&INFO_FORMAT=text/html&EXCEPTIONS=application/vnd.ogc.se_xml&X=397&Y=309&FEATURE_COUNT=100&&LAYERS=Umringe&QUERY_LAYERS=Umringe&STYLES=default
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1803807983440378
euroPathfinder (2024-06-09 07:49:46+00:00): Hi Hb-,
Ui sehr spannend, die Bilder/Website kannte ich noch nicht. Das schaue ich mir mal in Ruhe an, ich habe gerade ein bisschen viel um die Ohren um.

Viele Grüße, vielen Dank Dir für die Links und ein schönes Wochenende!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-29 10:00:07+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11919976780/history has fixme:type = barriere that was added in this edit
What kind of barrier is here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier - is any fitting?
MxxCon (2024-05-26 01:55:57+00:00): Hello.
You added construction_start_expected= tag to these features with dates in the past.
Does that mean construction did not start?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151585199
JozefM (2024-05-26 18:53:19+00:00): Hi,
The construction is under way, but wanted to record when it started. What would be the key to record when construction started on an ongoing construction
MxxCon (2024-05-27 00:48:07+00:00): It seems like, surprisingly, OSM doesn't have a well-established tag to encode the start of construction. 🤔🤷‍♂️
The closest I was able to find is construction_start= tag, but according to https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/construction_start there are only ~200 uses of it world-wide.

So while using that tag wouldn't be wrong, it's unlikely anybody would actually take advantage of that information.. unless there's a massive increase in popularity of this tag.
JozefM (2024-05-27 17:08:08+00:00): Thanks, I will change to this tag; Even though it is barely used, it looks to be better suited to record the start of an ongoing construction than "construction_start_expected"
Friendly_Ghost (2024-05-25 16:11:46+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151818527. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war for the reasons.
eggie (2024-05-20 17:02:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Mannivu (2024-05-20 17:20:31+00:00): Ciao, grazie per il tuo contributo e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap. Ti faccio solo notare che, come regola generale, agli edifici va aggiunto solo il nome ufficiale e non quello con cui è conosciuto localmente.
DressyPear4 (2024-05-21 10:07:25+00:00): Não copie dados de outros mapas! Nomes não devem ser abreviados
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151586394