piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JayMontana36 (2024-03-27 21:30:02+00:00): I did the survey earlier today, indeed that way does not exist, so it's been removed in the following changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149243472

IraGersh, afaik there is no way to discriminate between traces as OSM doesn't have a way to filter or determine what traces belong to bicycle and pedestrian vs all others, and then those traces (like mine for example) may also go between bicycle and pedestrian and car at any "random" given moment, so it also wouldn't particularly be very easy to either. Mostly, you would be creating and uploading your own GPS/GPX traces for use while mapping, and/or viewing specific traces from others' uploads, it seemingly isn't really meant to be used in any other ways as far as OSM goes.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-14 05:31:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Wspólna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11416396814

"Zielone Wzgórza":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11416396930

"Edwarda Chuchera":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11416396967
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11416397080

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Hvaldemar (2023-12-22 08:50:59+00:00): Dyrhaugbakken 11 er det riktige, ikke Dyrhaugvegen 11.
nsr2osm (2023-12-22 12:20:44+00:00): Feil meldes her til Kartverket/Matrikkelen:
https://rettikartet.no/
fortera_au (2023-12-14 06:03:40+00:00): Hi there, you've added a name to a path and three nodes, are you able to verify these are real names in some way, a photo of signs would be ideal? These names are quite suspicious and seem fictional.
psen (2023-12-14 23:10:38+00:00): yes i can provide photos of the signs in area. 
the paths are primarily used by MTB & CRAG. 
events in area will confirm the pseudo names  (local)

looking to extend the paths for easier navigation during event
radiotrefoil (2025-02-15 11:49:32+00:00): MTB names should be added under `mtb:name` tag rather than `name`; this will also make it less likely to be deleted
aceman444 (2024-03-18 00:25:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1196797045 this footway isn't even inside a building so it hardl can have any level.
You clearly have no idea what you are doing. Immediately fix all this damage and stop doing it worldwide!

I don't say level=1 is wrong on some of the roads, but layer=1 must stay too and converting everything from layer to level does not even solve what you pretend to be solving in the maproulette tasks.
Xvtn (2023-12-15 23:26:50+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contribution! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. Looks good overall, here are a couple of minor issues:
- Ways should generally be connected wherever it makes sense that one could travel between them. That means the path should connect to the highway somehow even if seems a little wonky.
- For something like this parking lot, if it's signed or officially labeled somehow as Pete's Pile Parking, name=* tag is best. However, if that's more of a casual name that the locals might refer to it by, the loc_name=* is better.

I went ahead and made those changes. (OSM can have somewhat of a wild west attitude to certain things... So not everyone might agree on my ideas. But I do my best to follow generally accepted best practices.)
Thanks again and happy mapping!
pdxmapper (2023-12-16 00:29:43+00:00): Thank you.  This is super helpful.  Good to know about loc_name. Unnamed parkings (or "pullout" in climbers' parlance) are very common.
george1201 (2023-12-14 21:22:41+00:00): Im Knoten ist noch eine falsche Hausnummer eingetragen. Sollte man korrigieren, oder die Adresse ganz entfernen. Bei disused-Objekten lösche ich mittlerweile alles außer dem disused-Tag. Alle nicht mehr gültigen Infos findet man ja in der History.
Scout Jens (2023-12-15 07:53:06+00:00): Die Adresse nehme ich raus, da sie hier ja nicht passt und ich nur den Hinweis der Homepage habe. Bei Nummer 16 deutet aber nichts auf die Firma hin.
george1201 (2023-12-15 14:54:54+00:00): Schon sonderbar, dass die Adresse auf der Homepage hier nicht zu finden ist. Vielleicht mal anrufen oder eine Mail schreiben :-).
george1201 (2023-12-15 14:58:16+00:00): Ist diese Seite vertrauenswürdig?
https://www.online-handelsregister.de/handelsregisterauszug/bw/Mannheim/HRB/707091/Nemectronde-GmbH
Dort steht:
Handelsregister Löschungen von Amts wegen vom 14.06.2017
HRB 707091: Nemectron.de GmbH, Karlsruhe, Daimlerstraße 15, 76185 Karlsruhe. Die Gesellschaft ist wegen Vermögenslosigkeit gemäß § 394 FamFG von Amts wegen gelöscht. Das Registerblatt ist geschlossen.
george1201 (2023-12-15 15:01:23+00:00): Der Knoten wurde 2018 erstmalig in OSM eingetragen. Wahrscheinlich nur aufgrund der Website, ohne Prüfung vor Ort :-(.
Warin61 (2023-12-15 07:01:26+00:00): Hi,
What does the 682 bus do? Do a circuit around the car park?
John Bek (2023-12-16 22:27:24+00:00): The 682 has been doing that for at least a year now
John Bek (2023-12-16 22:29:15+00:00): https://transportnsw.info/routes/details/blue-mountains-buses-network/686/64686
Warin61 (2023-12-17 10:47:18+00:00): Ok, I've made the changes to the 686 route. It is about the only thing they can do. I have moved the bus stop over to the car park too
arjunaraoc (2023-12-15 22:37:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia) addr:housenumber should be just number. check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page for more guidance
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145098814
aceman444 (2024-03-17 17:52:14+00:00): The layer tags were correct on these roads. 'level' key is no replacement for 'layer' they say different things.
You have fixed no intersections here, you actually added them.
Please learn the tag meanings from wiki before you damage stuff.
HikeAndMap (2024-02-01 23:09:52+00:00): Hi Mae, thank you for joining mapping! But please before changing information first check the wikipedia on mapping. There's some correct information which you replaced with false information. No problem, I'll rectify it. Please reach out to me if you're into mapping and I'll help you with the starters..

I'm located in Baguio and we're always happy with new mappers so please contact me.

Feel free to contact me on my mappers account HikeAndMap on OSM
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145098850
gscholz (2023-12-16 08:05:45+00:00): Hi montsec66,
this changeset has created errors regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=1.58755&lat=42.35825&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145098888

A you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Ti_Ru (2023-12-29 15:16:05+00:00): Hi
This is an arterial road and was never closed for metro work. Won't you even spare a minute to verify before you make a change. This kind of vandalism is very wrong and unacceptable. Seeing a lot of this kind of maniacal edits from Swiggy.
arjunaraoc (2023-12-17 00:29:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). name should be actual name like 1st main or 2nd cross and should not be generic.  Specify only essential tags such as restrictions. I have resolved partially vide https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145201364
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145099068
Xvtn (2023-12-15 23:21:55+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contribution! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. Everything looks good to me! One minor thing you may want to change - it's best to be explicit for every day of the week on opening_hours tag. That means putting the days the office is closed too. (Mo-Fr 09:00-17:00; Sa-Su off)
Thanks again and happy mapping!
jeslop (2023-12-20 10:41:56+00:00): Reverted on changeset

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145325542
rab (2023-12-14 17:58:37+00:00): Hello,
what was your initial intention with this changeset? All the roads and railroads were already drawn. You should not draw new features over existing ones.
Is there a source for tagging the A5 as an Motorway? 
I have reverted your changes for now.
Please let me know if you need any help
habi (2023-12-14 08:11:00+00:00): Mersi für die flinke Erledigung (in meiner Nachbarschaft).
balchen (2025-03-07 07:47:53+00:00): Hei. Hvorfor ble turstiene langs sjøen endret til g/s-vei?
FennecusZerda (2025-03-08 09:15:51+00:00): Oi. Du spør godt. Tror dette var som en del av oppdatering av diverse Sykkelhotell. Gjorde, som man ikke bør, "bare rydde litt rundt" samtidig. Bare å rette opp feil altså. Tror ikke jeg har noen hemmelig innside-informasjon her. 🙂 Takk for at du følger opp.
balchen (2025-03-08 10:23:50+00:00): Det er litt uklart akkurat her, for to turstier har en g/s-skilt i den ene enden, men ikke i andre enden, og ingen andre har. Men alt er grusede turstier, og ingen henger sammen med noe g/s-nettverk, så det spørs hva som var tenkt med de to enslige skiltene.
yrtimiD (2025-04-04 00:26:24+00:00): Hi, you added here tertiary road with name "2". Are you sure this is a correct name?
Flayer (2025-04-04 02:26:40+00:00): Hi, I certainly did not use that name "2", unless it was an accident. The name "2" seems odd and it is probably an error.
yrtimiD (2025-04-04 18:36:06+00:00): maybe it was lanes?
Flayer (2025-04-04 18:39:24+00:00): There is no way I could know how many lanes are supposed to be there.
gscscnd (2023-12-14 11:50:52+00:00): access=destination?
Sebastian | Yanosik (2023-12-14 12:00:23+00:00): Rozważałem tę opcję, generalnie lokalni wiedzą że mogą jeździć i znają drogę, więc access=no wydaje mi się w porządku. Możemy zmienić na destination, jeśli inne platformy używające OSM tego potrzebują
gscscnd (2023-12-14 12:12:04+00:00): Ja byłbym za zmianą i dodaniem construction=minor.
arjunaraoc (2023-12-18 01:31:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Name has to be  specific as displayed on sign boards. check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145233849
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145100509
Udarian (2023-12-14 13:00:08+00:00): I was wondering if you could also check your sources and see if the following ways are still under construction:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49238754
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/943857975/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1228196958/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1228196959/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1228196957
. I wouldn't normally ask, its just that all the sources we have on the default instance of iD are out dated enough that I am not sure what completed and what isnt along with the status of all the construction and cannot currently survey their statuses currently so I was wondering if your sources (which seem to be relatively more up to date then those I have access to) showed anything different there or changes to roadway geometries that I cannot yet tell from the sources I have access to. again sorry for the random comment, I have no issue with this commit at all I was just hopping that a similar commit expanding the data on the other side of Delphine Expressway could also be done, I'm just asking for some help from a fellow mapper.
Udarian (2023-12-14 13:14:26+00:00): also ways:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38840050/
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38840051/
seem to not be there on what imagery we do have in iD.
vrynkevich_lyft (2023-12-15 22:15:11+00:00): Hi, Udarian! My name is Veranika and I am a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft.
Based on the Lyft telemetry data and street-level imagery, the roads you are interested in are not yet open for traffic (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_2gAfut70WQyMzMRcSstmFjAp9Lya2Sh/view?usp=drive_link - the multicolored dots are drivers' tracks, showing where they can pass and where roads are most likely closed). As this area has quite active traffic, when the construction is finished, we will know that the roads opened in a short time and remove the construction tags.
As for roads https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38840050/ and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38840051/, according to Lyft-owned aerial imagery https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EI5rH4Y2ejNC_jObndIAh542IEyEfqBK/view they can be removed as there is construction going on at this location and the roads will be changed (the roads that are under construction are already in the OSM).
Happy to help!!
Best regards, Veranika
Glassman (2023-12-15 20:14:17+00:00): I'm curious why you moved the tree onto the motorway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145101039
Aleks-Berlin (2023-12-17 15:56:51+00:00): Hi ahgou,
please dont use urls in wikimedia-tags! Details here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons#Common_tagging_mistakes
Thanks, Alex
ahgou (2023-12-17 16:03:22+00:00): oh thanks! I did think it was weird but I thought I was following the given example, so it did not occur to me to check. Cheers!
Bienson (2023-12-15 05:33:23+00:00): Hallo,

Bitte entweder korrekt arbeiten oder es besser sein lassen - es ist mehr Arbeit, deine Änderungen zu korrigieren, als es direkt selber zu machen.

Wieso schließt du weiterhin, nach etlichen Hinweisen dazu, Fehlermeldungen bezüglich Gebäudeteilen, die fälschlicherweise als eigenständige Gebäude eingetragen wurden, anstatt diesen Fehler zu korrigieren?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4026158

Wieso löschst du diese vier korrekten Adressen-Nodes?:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11393317026
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11393317023
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11393317027
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11393317028

Und fügst sie stattdessen mit den shop-POIs zusammen, womit du auch die Adressen dieser Läden verfälschst oder falsch einträgst.

Blumen Risse und Café Strickmann haben 26-28 als Adresse:

https://www.blumen-risse.de/standorte/blumenlaeden/3310-dortmund-innenstadt-wissstrasse

https://www.cafe-strickmann.de/

Oxfam hat 30-32 als Adresse:

https://shops.oxfam.de/shops/dortmund

Gelato e Coffee ist in Hausnr. 34, also ist auch die Position falsch (bereits vor deinem Edit).

Also, alle vier eingetragenen oder geänderten Adressen sind falsch.
Die Adressen-Nodes sollten natürlich alleine stehen, damit z.B. auch eine Suche nach "Wißstraße 30" dorthin verweist, wenn das Gebäude selber Hausnummer 30-32 hat, und damit bei potenziellen Schließungen der Läden die Adressen nicht einfach mitgelöscht werden.

Wieso wird aus "Apotheken-Museum" das inkorrekte "Apotheken Museum" ohne Bindestrich?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11416707256

Wieso löschst du diese Barriere, die weiterhin vorhanden ist? Ist vllt. nicht sinnvoll, aber diese Blumenkästen stehen dort immer noch:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/672056785

Zusätzlich kann ich nicht einfach den Änderungssatz revidieren, da du sehr viele verschiedene Änderungen von verschiedenen Orten in einem Changeset vereinst.
Bitte kleine Änderungssätze produzieren.

Was sollen die ganzen Schließungen der Notes und Löschungen von Telefonzellen? Diese sind nicht einmal von der Post. Und sie existieren auch noch - ob sie funktionstüchtig sind, ist eine andere Frage.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2595299
arjunaraoc (2023-12-29 04:45:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145645535
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145101924
SekeRob (2023-12-14 16:04:46+00:00): Hi,

Seeing you modded this route just before me, I may have broken 552 at the Treglio roundabout, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364117986
Certainly did not sort the 2x552 route members as there are just too many, 1209 on 1 of the 552s. Recommended is max 300 (super routes may be solution to think about).

The problem here was there were 2 roundabouts mapped on top of each other. One had the turn restrictions and the other the Flixbus links. Deleted latter and moved route links to the remaining one. (one classed as service, one as unclassified at that as well, for years).

So you're aware.
Ciao
adamos (2023-12-14 16:50:26+00:00): Hello,
thanks for info. I have fixed both Flixbus relations, also make the roundabout as one way - service as it should be in this context. Please verify everything is OK. By the way, what tool do you use for editing? Using JOSM is very simple and intuitive for relations, no matter the no. of members.
SekeRob (2023-12-14 19:43:58+00:00): hmmm, I loaded the zone again and once more the roundabout has double sections, one having the turn restrictions, the other uncut circle the flixbus relations. Also no idea why you started editing other stuff outside your route. Was not asked for. Just apply your route to the roads as is, not more not less. No objections to cut up roundabouts to avoid these silly full loops which the drivers obviously don't do either, they take the shortest way on-off.

v.v "also make the roundabout as one way", roundabouts when drawn in the proper direction don't need to be oneway tagged unless you meant the roundabout as a single line way. That of course can't be with the turn restrictions.
Anyway double ways is no go and has me concerned this is not happened elsewhere as well with whatever tools you use to fix Flixbus routes.

I use JOSM and I know it can, but avoid any mucking with their route order. Doesn't matter where one touches a road with a Flixbus link and PT reports problems by the bushel, no different today over at Peligna Pratola where a roundabout was incorrectly mapped with shortcuts. Sure enough this odd full looping is wholly unnecessary.

ciao
adamos (2023-12-14 20:37:15+00:00): OK, now I understand you want to have the roundabout in multiple segments, good. I fives the relations again, now it should be fine. Ciao
GEO ECLA (2023-12-14 15:18:40+00:00): Complété sur Macornay
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145102534
eggie (2023-12-14 10:10:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 


Feedback Alle begin is moeilijk. Een parkeerplaats is iets anders dan een parkeervak.
Zie
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking

en

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space



MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-12-14 10:25:43+00:00): Al die losse 'parkeerplaatsen' omgetagd naar parking_space.
De parkeerplaats zelf ligt daar als een vlak overheen.

MVG
eggie
arjunaraoc (2023-12-28 15:04:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145624229
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145103032
Cebderby (2023-12-14 12:44:44+00:00): more non-buildings  eg wood areas changed to buildings here
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145103033&relations=true
Davileci (2024-03-26 01:40:22+00:00): https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1J6N
Davileci (2024-03-26 01:42:04+00:00): Haur eta Lehen Hezkuntzako Ikastetxe
kapazao (2024-03-26 22:42:34+00:00): Hola, ¿podrías explicar este comentario?
Davileci (2024-03-27 00:43:12+00:00): Sí, tiene que ver con los colegios que tienen denominación bilingüe en castellano y en euskera. Cuando la denominación genérica es bilingüe, se encabeza en castellano con "Colegio de Educación Infantil y Primaria" o "Colegio Privado de Educación Infantil y Primaria", se sigue con la denominación específica y se termina en euskera con el correpondiente "Haur eta Lehen Hezkuntzako Ikastetxe" o "Haur eta Lehen Hezkuntzako Ikastetxe Pribatua" entre otras posibilidades. A su vez, estas denominaciones genéricas se pueden abreviar como "CEIP" o "CPEIP" en castellano y "HLHI" o "HLHIP" en euskera entre otras.
Teniendo en cuenta lo anterior, las siglas "HLHI", "HLHIP" y otras no deberían aparecer en el campo del nombre sino en el del nombre abreviado y deberían remplazarse por las palabras cuyas iniciales representan. Así, por ejemplo, la búsqueda de Overpass de este hilo encuentra nombres (name) acabados en "HLHI", cuando lo correcto sería acabar en "Haur eta Lehen Hezkuntzako Ikastetxe".
No sé cómo hacer estos cambios sin ir caso por caso y por eso le pido ayuda.
Davileci (2024-03-27 01:29:46+00:00): Lo anterior no sirve para Navarra, puesto que ahí "CPEIP" significa más bien "Colegio Público de Educación Infantil y Primaria" y se traduce como "HLHIP", "Haur eta Lehen Hezkuntzako Ikastetxe Publikoa".
kapazao (2024-03-27 10:40:03+00:00): De acuerdo, por mi parte mis correcciones fueron dirigidas a las siglas CEIP y no entendía el significado de HLHI, por eso las dejé de esta forma hasta que conocer el significado.

Anteriormente otros usuarios dejaron los nombres con las siglas CEIP + HLHI y lo ideal es que esto estuviera en short_name y en el nombre tuviésemos lo completo, diferenciando además la parte euskera de la castellana.

Las correcciones las podría hacer fácilmente conociendo cómo debería ser el resultado.
Entonces entiendo que en euskera no se pondría CEIP sino HLHI, pero al final y en castellano al contrario, ¿no?

Ejemplo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111843442
name=José Miguel Barandiaran Haur eta Lehen Hezkuntzako Ikastetxe
name:es=Colegio de Educación Infantil y Primaria José Miguel Barandiaran
name:eu=José Miguel Barandiaran Haur eta Lehen Hezkuntzako Ikastetxe

Confirmadme el caso y lo trato de corregir y ya me confirmáis si está todo correcto
Davileci (2024-03-27 14:48:18+00:00): He actualizado la vía del ejemplo con mi propuesta,  que es bilingüe para el País Vasco (en Navarra apenas he encontrado estos problemas).
Por otro lado, quiero cambiar "Ikastetxe" por "Ikastetxea", tal y como aparece en el índice https://www2.hezkuntza.net/appcont/irale/dircen/html/e23siglak_deno_centros.html siguiendo esta búsqueda http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1JbV
Además, he añadido el siguiente mensaje al foro https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/el-uso-de-las-siglas-ies-ceip-y-otras-delante-de-los-nombre-propios-de-los-centros-educativos/104200/8
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2024-05-06 15:04:12+00:00): Buenas, en varios centros situados en Cantalejo, has eliminado los nombres de los centros en Gacería que estaban bajo la etiqueta "alt_name".
¿Porqué?
Saludos!
kapazao (2024-05-07 05:28:52+00:00): Buenas, estaría bien si indicaras a qué centros haces referencia.
En este caso revisando los 2 centros que hay en Cantalejo, en uno (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/607971106) se eliminó la etiqueta alt_name="Pautra de Pitoches" porque no se encontraba en ninguna parte y no se hacía referencia a dicho nombre, que estaría bien conocer qué tiene que ver con el centro educativo. Igualmente se pudo haber hecho con el otro centro (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/607971101).
En este caso simplemente se añadieron las siglas de los centros y se revisaron las etiquetas de nombre para evitar posibles errores, que no quita que los pueda haber.
Ver http://ceiplosarenales.centros.educa.jcyl.es/sitio/index.cgi
Si es posible cuando añadas ese tipo de etiquetas alt_name, que no concuerdan con el centro, indica de donde viene esa referencia para evitar problemas como este.
Un saludo