piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisRevert (2026-04-10 10:33:16+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181138220
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
osmviborg (2026-04-02 09:39:41+00:00): Careful what you delete. This one still exist https://www.fahrradfaehre.info/
Matthes2010 (2026-04-02 09:47:54+00:00): The ferry now only operates between Egernsund, Brunsnæs, and Langballigau see https://www.fahrradfaehre.info/om-os/find-vej
osmviborg (2026-04-02 09:51:28+00:00): 👍
NeisBot (2026-04-02 09:30:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13700911284 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cleaning services office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-10 10:33:19+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181138224
(Delete spam tags. First version)
NeisBot (2026-04-02 09:30:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/633670743 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Islamic school"
---
Misalnya, versi teks yang lebih netral dan faktual bisa jadi: "sekolah Islam"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
FajrAl (2026-04-05 12:06:43+00:00): False positive. Should be capitalize each: "MI Raden Rahmat Balongbendo"
Mlvln (2026-04-03 10:32:33+00:00): Lieber RudiXXL,

kannst du an dem Museum die Description ändern? Aktuell ließt sie sich wie eine Werbung.

Das Wiki schreibt dazu:

"The description should only include neutral and factual information about the object. It should not include subjective evaluations, e.g. "the best restaurant in town", "modern, comfortable hotel, in the heart of the city". Do not use description=* for advertising messages."

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description

Liebe Grüße
Mlvln
kingkingHK (2026-04-02 10:16:27+00:00): You sure it's just called "Public Transport Interchange"?
Kovoschiz (2026-04-02 10:41:41+00:00): "PTI" belongs in `official_name=`
vectorial8192 (2026-04-02 11:10:13+00:00): No, I am not sure it is just called "Public Transport Interchange".

At least we can't have a roof that holds the name of the PTI. That's already an improvement. Actual name will be left as a future todo.
Ahtojää (2026-04-03 21:07:32+00:00): Hei! Millä perusteella muutit Karamalmentien katuluokkaa? Se on nyt samassa luokassa kuin esim Kilon sisäiset paikalliset kokoojat vaikka palvelee selvästi pidempimatkaista liikennettä ja on poikkileikkaukseltaan erilainen.
TrickyFoxy (2026-04-05 19:52:31+00:00): 👋  c=CRTA What did you mean?
dpolovinkin (2026-07-23 06:02:32+00:00): don't ignore warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway like that please, okay?
eggie (2026-04-02 10:45:42+00:00): Hi Maya... Esri world is outdated.
All buikding (also construction) are import from the Dutch Registry. 
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=klappolder&objectId=1621100010075710&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=97420.6958851953&geometry.y=448853.45312275755&zoomlevel=12.206683354264735&bijbehorendeAdressen=Pand
Please don't change buildingshapes in the Netherlands

Greetz,
eggie
Vinber-Pro (2026-04-03 13:04:39+00:00): bonjour et merci,

vive les ludothèque !

j'ai ajouté quelques éléments https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13701012844

bonne carto
yelisey90 (2026-04-02 15:47:03+00:00): reverted - you've unexplained and incorrect assumptions on the type of buildings being constructed
Wildsharky (2026-05-12 05:47:30+00:00): Hi yelisey90,

Thank you for your feedback.

I understand your concern regarding the assumption made about the construction type. However, no buildings or geometries from your contribution were reverted or removed. That was a bad wording choice on my part.

Instead I added recommended construction=* tag.

Based on the available Esri World Imagery, construction=apartments was added as a best interpretation of the visible structures. 

Thank you for your contribution and feedback to OpenStreetMap.
yelisey90 (2026-05-12 07:08:40+00:00): For the reference: the majority of the buildings in question will most likely be detached houses for a single family. Maybe a couple will be for 2-3 families, but still that's not apartments.
NeisBot (2026-04-02 10:15:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 27 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/753866930 v2 | 27 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7043408560 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180759670
iandees (2026-04-02 13:14:30+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7043408560 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180767505, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Zrop (2026-04-05 19:06:29+00:00): Hallo bernward1,
wieso löschst Du hier schon wieder einen Unterstand https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1363079348 ? Hier ist nichts doppelt gemappt.

Gruß
Zrop
NeisBot (2026-04-02 10:24:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1495456118 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1495456117 v1 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180760003
NeisBot (2026-04-02 10:27:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13701024626 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Construction company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-10 10:33:22+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/180933816
Vinber-Pro (2026-04-02 13:21:10+00:00): Qu'est ce qui n'existe plus ?
ironspock (2026-04-04 15:40:19+00:00): Hallo dx125,
ich habe die Bäume im westlichen Teil der Waldemarstraße wieder gelöscht, da dort schon seit einiger Zeit keine Bäume mehr stehen. Die Strasse wird ausserdem komplett umgestaltet.
Gruss ironspock
dx125 (2026-04-04 17:18:35+00:00): Hallo Ironspock,
danke,
das aktuellste Luftbild Dop20 ist wahrscheinlich vom Frühjahr 2025 und hier scheinbar schon wieder veraltet.
Falls du irgendwo eine bessere Kenntnis von den Dingen vor Ort hast, dann korregier mich gerne.
Gruß
dx125
suzunote (2026-04-02 11:27:50+00:00): 編集ありがとうございます！
後から見返しやすくするために、uではなくもう少し何をしたのか内容が分かるコメントを書いていただけると助かります🙏

参考：変更セットの良いコメント
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E5%A4%89%E6%9B%B4%E3%82%BB%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%E3%81%AE%E8%89%AF%E3%81%84%E3%82%B3%E3%83%A1%E3%83%B3%E3%83%88
eggie (2026-04-02 10:52:12+00:00): Hi,

Please select the resent addressnode to tag on. I merged your info.
gr eggie
NeisBot (2026-04-02 10:57:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13701036588 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Pediatric dentistry office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-10 16:33:06+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181157247
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-04-02 11:12:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13701124658 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-10 16:33:11+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181157252
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Wildsharky (2026-04-07 03:56:55+00:00):  Reverted in changeset id:180922447
Timmy_Tesseract (2026-04-08 06:46:58+00:00): Good day. Looks like you missed some follow-up edits made after the reverted changeset but before your revert. As a consequence your edit removed numerous lifecycle disused prefixes and check_dates while restoring unnecessary tags that have been previously deleted.

Fixed in changeset/181032160
NeisBot (2026-04-02 11:15:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/4526550538 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Elettrodomestici store"
---
Ad esempio, una versione più neutra e fattuale del tuo testo potrebbe essere: "Negozio di elettrodomestici"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-10 16:33:14+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180772993
aq123 (2026-04-02 18:26:44+00:00): Hi!
According to wiki area:highway should cover only the lanes without parkings and traffic islands:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway?uselang=en

If your intention was to specify the surface of parking spaces and bus station, I think it would be better to mark those parkings instead (with amenity=parking + surface=asphalt). 
And the bus station square with public_transport=platform + surface=asphalt: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dplatform
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180762652
NeisBot (2026-04-02 11:27:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13701134629 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Furniture store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-10 16:33:17+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181157263
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
spiregrain (2026-04-02 13:51:37+00:00): 80 Henniker Road (912531435) is a weird one.  Got demolished ages ago, and now the site is just empty.  Planning permission was granted yonks ago for a site-filling, 4-storey block of flats.   I'll shortly go and add the planning ref to the OSM object.
NeisBot (2026-04-02 11:42:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/388954140 v4 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/388954141 v4 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/11409417352 v2
https://osm.org/node/3921275887 v3
https://osm.org/node/11409417350 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180763372
kitsee (2026-04-03 06:45:18+00:00): Hi Jacob,
I'm reverting this change as I know for a fact that these are not one way roads and I'm 90% sure its a 20 up to the edge of the town from own local knowledge.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180796362
suzunote (2026-04-02 11:43:35+00:00): 編集ありがとうございます！
後から見返しやすくするために、コメント未入力ではなく何をしたのか内容が分かるコメントを書いていただけると助かります🙏

参考：変更セットの良いコメント
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E5%A4%89%E6%9B%B4%E3%82%BB%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%E3%81%AE%E8%89%AF%E3%81%84%E3%82%B3%E3%83%A1%E3%83%B3%E3%83%88
aixbrick (2026-04-02 12:40:35+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
die Eintragung von Flur- bzw. Gewannnamen ist immer wieder Gegenstand von Diskussionen, auch aktuell: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/neues-tag-fur-flurnamen/142342
Das Problem: Es sind sind Namen, die historisch und vor Ort selten verifizierbar sind, sie stehen lediglich in ALKIS. Ich persönlich erfasse sie nicht, lösche sie aber auch nicht. Das können andere Mapper anders sehen. Sei also nicht überrascht, wenn sie plötzlich wieder verschwunden sind :-).
Gruß
Tris_1220 (2026-04-03 09:05:06+00:00): I updated the landuse of the plot now acording to your edit, to landuse=construction.

https://www.osm.org/changeset/180800881
arvedarved (2026-04-03 11:49:45+00:00): Thanks!
NeisRevert (2026-04-02 20:09:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/180785672
where the comment is: "Revert name change"
qstep (2026-04-02 20:53:56+00:00): Üdv az OpenStreetMap-en! Mivel tudod bizonyítani, hogy az ösvény nem létezik? Egy másik felhasználótól kaptam képet és részletes leírást, amelyet a "Remete-hegyi-bérc" nevű kilátóhelyről küldött, amelyen látszik Füzér Vára is, emellett a Strava heatmapjén is látni ott mozgást.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 09:24:16+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, possibly sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184127594

https://osm.org/changeset/184127594
eggie (2026-04-02 13:07:49+00:00): Dag Sander, je vraagt feedback.
Iets is pas een fietspad als er een bord fietspad staat G11, 13 of 12a.
Staat er een G7 bord dan gebruiken we footway.
Staat er niets dan is de tagging highway=path met foot= yes en bicycle=yes of no
De hamvraag is dus is het wel een fietspad? Zoniet.. kan het dan niet beter als highway=path worden getagd?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-02 13:11:18+00:00): We kennen bij bordloze wegen ook Ducktagging. Kwaakt het als een eend dan is het een eend...
Sander Steenweg (2026-04-02 14:15:58+00:00): Er staan borden fietspad (dus officieel) maar is tevens wandelpad. Kunnen beide toegewezen worden?  
mvg
Sander
eggie (2026-04-02 14:25:57+00:00): Hoi,

Wanneer er een bord fietspad staat dan is het een fietspad en daar mag je in Nederland gewoon op wandelen (In Duitsland niet)
De bekendste type fietspaden zijn deze drie:
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway
Die tags kun je evt toevoegen
Sommige mappers voegen ook foot=yes toe, maar dat is eigenlijk default.

Tegenwoordig heb je ook die 'Houd rekening met elkaar' paden. 
Maar daar staat vaak ook nog een G11 of G13 bord bij. 
Mapse,
eggie
eggie (2026-04-02 20:14:37+00:00): Zpo het gewoon fietspad laten. Eenduidig getagd.
woodpeck_repair (2026-04-02 12:07:46+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 180362659, 180362972, 180391696, 180391713, 180391823, 180391929, 180755115, 180755147, 180755276.
trigpoint (2026-04-03 11:46:04+00:00): An Arabic name for Bristol Zoo seems unlikely. Does it appear on the signs?
ancuanatuath (2026-04-12 17:43:56+00:00): Cha bu chòir dhut a bhith ag atharrachadh ainmean-àite mar seo a charaid. Tha fhios agad nach bu chòir ainmean-àite Gàidhlig a bhith ann mar prìomh ainm (no mar ainm dà-chànanach), ann an sgìrean far nach eil mòran aig a bheil Gàidhlig, a-rèir an stiùireadh a thaobh ainmean-àite ann an Alba. Ma tha thu airson ag atharrachadh an stiùiridh, feumaidh tu sin a dheasbad air an fhòram (no air an liosta puist). Air neo, bidh cuideigin a' cur nan ainmean air ais gu Beurla a h-uile turas.

A bharrachd air sin, a bheil cead agad na h-ainmean-àite seo a chleachdadh? Tha "Place-Names of the Galloway Glens" fo cheadachas CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 agus cha bhi dàta fon ceadachas sin freagarrach do dh'OSM, mar a tha air a mhìneachadh air an duilleag seo: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Creative_Commons.
jSeke (2026-04-17 20:18:20+00:00): tha mi duilich, bha fhios agam mu dhèidhinn a' chiad rud 's bha mi dìreach ag iarraidh gum bi tuilleadh Gàidhlig ri fhaicinn air OSM, ach cuiridh mi stad air. Bha mi buileach aineolach air an darna phuing, tapadh leibh airson m' innse
ancuanatuath (2026-04-18 21:20:14+00:00): Tha mi a' tuigsinn - bu toil leamsa tuilleadh Gàidhlig fhaicinn air a' mhapa, ach ma tha name:gd ann feumaidh duine sam bith mapa Gàidhlig a chruthachadh. A bheil thu eòlach air An Fhaclair Bheag? Tha e a' cleachdadh mapa OSM a-nis agus tha ainmean dà-chànanach ann.

Ma thèid Areas of Linguistic Significance a stèidheachadh, 's dòcha gum bu chòir ainmean Gàidhlig (no dà-chànanach) a bhith annta, ach feumaidh sin a bhith deasbad air an fhòram gun fhios nach bi cuid ag aontachadh.
NeisBot (2026-04-02 12:30:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11513556019 v8

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Real estate agency"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : « Agence immobilière »
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-02 16:33:16+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
ULYS Immobilier Paris | Estimation Appartement • Vente • Location (2026-04-03 07:21:36+00:00): Hi,
Actually, I removed the suffix « Estimation - Location - Vente ».
I reintroduced the « immobilier » because my brand and my agency is named « ULYS Immobilier », cf. https://data.inpi.fr/marques/FR4389881?q=#FR4389881

« ULYS » only refers to a a brand of highway contactless pass, i’ve been mixed up too often (Even if they lauched after me).

Being at your disposal.
Julien
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 16:30:55+00:00): Hi Julien,

As described in the comment above as well as on your previous changeset, while the original name=* tag was certainly quite a problem (see https://osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions ), the main issue the comments were describing was using the description=* for promotional advertising , which is considered SEO spam and strictly prohibited on OSM.

See, for example, https://osm.wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam:

> Typical features of SEO Spam 
>
> Often the Changeset Description and Description tag contain marketing hype. Marketing hype is not objectively verifiable and breaks one of OSM's key criteria of verifiability. Unverifiable claims should be deleted.

And furthermore, https://osm.wiki/Key:description#No_advertising :

> No advertising
>
> The description should only include neutral and factual information about the object. It should not include subjective evaluations, e.g. "the best restaurant in town", "modern, comfortable hotel, in the heart of the city". Do not use description=* for advertising messages. They will be removed as spam and may also have further consequences for your OSM account.

In this changeset, you added back without explanation the description that was specifically removed for running afoul of these criteria, which was the reason for the revert in the first place.

Normally SEO spam would be immediately removed wholesale with appropriate consequences for your OSM account, but as unlike the vast majority of SEO spam accounts you've made at least an apparent good-faith effort to engage here, I've gone ahead and just removed the offending description=* as well as fixed your misformatted phone=* tag to match local and national convention.

https://osm.org/changeset/184924437

Thanks.
Laureline OTAA (2026-04-02 13:02:56+00:00): super
Vinber-Pro (2026-04-02 15:00:30+00:00): merci de ce soutien :)
eggie (2026-04-02 13:14:37+00:00): Beste Jos,

Geef svp concreet  aan wat je hebt gewijzigd.
Wijzigingen zegt helemaal niets. Concreet commentaar wordt op prijs gesteld.
MVG
eggie
McKulkin (2026-04-02 12:41:22+00:00): Reasons for the removal of this path:
1) Protected territory laws don't allow wandering off marked trails. The trail up to the cave hasn't been laid out. Cave itself is marked on the official map, but there's no trail leading up to it.
2) High traffic touristic area. High possibility of unprepared tourists trying to storm the hill injuring themselves.
3) There are talks of renovating the infra and building a proper trail up.

As far as I understood the park admin would prefer to keep this path off the public map.
evgenykatyshev (2026-04-02 13:56:04+00:00): The single reason to delete these paths is that they don't exists on the ground. All reasons mentioned above aren't valid for deleteion
evgenykatyshev (2026-04-02 14:00:20+00:00): If the paths exist but aren't allowed to use, adding access=no is good approach