piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kurisubrooks (2023-12-22 01:02:49+00:00): Fortera is correct here. The OSM definitions of roads are completely different/separate from the Government's own classification scheme. This has always been the case.

**Road hierarchy must be based on the OSM Wiki definitions in OSM and not that of any outside source. OSM does not exist to replicate any Government database or information. OSM records the true state of the environment as it exists on the ground at that moment. It is up to your own best interpretation of the existing environment in accordance with the mapping standards that are set forth in the wiki.**
slice0 (2023-12-22 01:10:54+00:00): @kurusubrooks, the definition of Secondary/primary and trunk are exactly the same between Data SA and OSM wiki guidelines. Territory roads on the other hand do have a different meaning between Data SA and OSM guidelines. What are you trying to say here?
kurisubrooks (2023-12-22 01:17:33+00:00): I'm unfamiliar with the Data SA definitions, but rarely should they match the OSM guidelines. Would you be able to provide me with the definitions?
slice0 (2023-12-22 01:26:39+00:00): https://www.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/10609/A_Functional_Hierarchy_for_SAs_Land_Transport_Network.pdf https://dit.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/553233/MASTER_SPECIFICATION_-_PART_RD-GM-D1_-_ROAD_DESIGN.pdf
slice0 (2023-12-22 01:30:39+00:00): @kurisbrooks, also your not here to seek to understand anything though are you? you open with a bias statement out of nowhere and now leaving it up to me to prove why fortera is wrong. thankyou for stopping by in the changelog discussion and goodbye
slice0 (2023-12-22 01:43:11+00:00): and also just for your own knowledge because you seem to comment a lot when I am involved in a discussion. this road was classed as secondary based on OSM guideline, government sources and definitions and "what is on the ground". fortera decided to use their own interpretation and with out discussion went ahead and changed. I am merely reverting it and saying hey we should talk about it first. why does it feel like i need to defend my actions when I did nothing wrong in the first place.
slice0 (2023-12-22 02:58:50+00:00): lmao have either of you two even read the wiki, the very first sentence "Use highway=secondary to tag highways which are not part of major routes, but nevertheless form a link in the national route network." that is exactly the definition of the road in question here, far out you guys dont even know what you are arguing for here. you are both saying the wiki is right and everything well I have news for you I agree and going by the wiki it should be secondary. far out I hope the board and dwg member see how pointless this whole argument has been considering the wiki says it should be secondary lmao. I think we need to start posting out uni degrees from now on.
slice0 (2023-12-22 03:06:29+00:00): here I am posting dictionary meaning and government sources and all we have here is simply a troll/vandel and someone else defending the troll/vandel lmao. I will be using this changeset comment log if any further issues are brought up. have a nice day
slice0 (2023-12-22 03:12:42+00:00): I made a diary entry for the whole community to see, so that they know what trolls I have to deal with https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/slice0/diary
ouchjars (2023-12-22 03:24:56+00:00): slice0, if you are referring to me as one of the SA community members you've discussed this with previously, you are misinterpreting my position. I welcomed your importing of DIT classification as a starting point for updating the map, but always maintained, as fortera_au has given in the second comment here, there could be reasons to vary from it.
slice0 (2023-12-22 03:28:51+00:00): @ouchkars no not you bro, we were the first people to discuss the data sa road classification, I was even against it at first remember because of the trunk roads. I am talking about fortera and kurisubrooks
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-22 04:08:30+00:00): slice0, I've scanned the documents you linked above & can't see where they match the Australian guidelines for tagging roads: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Roads#Road_Hierarchy ? Could you please point out the section that does? I would also ask you again, to be more respectful of other mappers. Polite discussion of mapping options does NOT include public accusations of vandalism &/or being a troll. Graeme Fitzpatrick
Moderator, OSMF Data Working Group.
slice0 (2023-12-22 04:24:28+00:00): page 17 shows the major traffic route which covers the trunk roads and matches the OSM wiki rules for being "major traffic roads", the secondary road network from data sa matches the definition of how secondary roads should be classified and so does the primary roads. If I need to post sources and meanings and references and have long discussions about this. We need more information and data and sources for someone to simply say its a territory road "because I think it is", right now it would be classified incorrectly as a territory road if I didnt catch it.
slice0 (2023-12-22 04:34:39+00:00): also the other day fortera changed a residential road to secondary road because OSMcha told him too lmao, then he defends this edit but realised after a while it was wrong. so then he changed these others secondary roads to territory because he lost the argument and wanted to prove something. the roads he changed from secondary to territory was part of south australia major shipping transport route lmao. and im expected to blindly accept his "because I think it is" as fact.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-22 04:59:27+00:00): OK, page 17 shows a map of Major Traffic Routes, while the Desired Outcome box on p16 broadly agrees with OSM guidelines for motorways. But the disagreement over the last couple of days appears to be mainly regarding lower classifications of roads - OSM Primary, Secondary, Tertiary, Residential & Unclassified roads? Do you have Govt definitions for those?
slice0 (2023-12-22 05:06:41+00:00): page 32 under "Road function description" https://www.dit.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/658692/MASTER_SPECIFICATION_-_PART_M11_-_UNSEALED_ROADS.pdf im not stupid, I went to uni and everything and passed.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-22 05:40:43+00:00): Yes, they're spec's for unsealed roads in rural areas. Do you have anything similar for sealed roads in urban areas? & incidentally, AFAIK, the only SA Govt data that we are authorised to use is from the Data SA site: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#South_Australia. Do you have any sources from there?
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-22 05:42:39+00:00): & again, no snide comments about going to Uni, thanks. Lots of other mappers have as well, & even more people who map haven't been!
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-23 01:59:41+00:00): Waiting on response re your data sources, thank you, slice0
slice0 (2023-12-23 02:05:53+00:00): @fizzie, the discussion has moved elsewhere
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-23 02:11:35+00:00): Where to?
slice0 (2023-12-23 02:13:09+00:00): DWG email
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-23 02:16:53+00:00): Yes, & I can see that another DWG member has asked you the same question (as well as an OSMF Board member) & you haven't yet responded to either of them!
slice0 (2023-12-23 02:21:55+00:00): I responded by replying to the email from the DWG that I received. I have not heard back since I replied either. I will copy and paste the email here if you want
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-23 02:26:30+00:00): Do you have a DWG reference #?
slice0 (2023-12-23 02:54:03+00:00): Re: [Ticket#2023122210000115] Issue #28303 thats the one ive been replying to that I got the email from
slice0 (2023-12-23 03:10:33+00:00): just noticed that its from the email address that is saved with OSM not my personal one if that helps
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-23 03:12:49+00:00): No response received on that ticket since your complaint at 6.59 AEST this morning, & the response from the DWG at 7.12 asking you for evidence. You had better send it again, or if you prefer, post it here?
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-23 03:17:44+00:00): The address you send it from shouldn't make any difference. Did you send it to data@openstreetmap.org?
slice0 (2023-12-23 03:21:41+00:00): do you have it now? the sender in my inbox just came up as "DWG" and I was replying to it but I think I was replying to a message instead sorry for the confusion
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-23 04:47:30+00:00): Yes, received now. Please leave it with us.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-23 04:48:11+00:00): Sorry, actually wrote that last message an hour ago but didn't send it.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-23 04:49:10+00:00): You haven't yet answered my question though. Do you have any sources, that we can use, for making changes to urban roads?
slice0 (2023-12-23 04:50:31+00:00): no worries thankyou
mavl (2023-12-14 16:26:00+00:00): Здравствуйте. Действительно ли у здания номер "50ЛЕТВЛКСМ с79"?  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/192601733
mavl (2023-12-14 16:35:59+00:00): Номер "40ЛЕТПОБЕДЫ"?  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/581124478
mavl (2023-12-14 16:38:40+00:00): Номер "50ЛЕТВЛКСМ"?  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/682713824
Revnoplex (2023-12-14 11:53:29+00:00): Post Description: Also removed/reverted tags from detour roads
Ewen Hill (2023-12-17 02:11:28+00:00): Thanks Revnoplex for reactivating the bridge and surrounds which was on my to do list after hearing the good news earlier this week
Xvtn (2023-12-15 23:19:44+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contribution! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. The Description tag should be a concise description of the feature rather than a free-form ad space. Also, opening hours tag follows a specific syntax. It can be a little tricky but using this format makes it machine-readable, meaning apps and whatnot can parse it reliably.
I went ahead and made those corrections. Thanks again, and welcome to OSM!
eggie (2023-12-14 12:18:16+00:00): Beste Marieke... Maak nu svp van die parking space geen amenity=parking. 
Waarom zou een stroomkabel vast zitten aan wegen en een oversteekplaats hebben voor fietsers? 

Een wijngaard tag je als volgt
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dvineyard

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-12-14 12:20:55+00:00): De powerline met eenrichtingverkeer zal ik vast verwijderen

Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145109128

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-12-14 12:25:49+00:00): Gras bij pand 18 aangepast naar meadow. Wanneer het een wijngaard is dan aanpassen .. zie wiki boven.
gileri (2023-12-20 21:41:01+00:00): Salut, je crois que le lien n'est pas bon, ça renvoie sur une autre station. J'ai pas réussi à trouver comment générer l'URL de ce point de comptage, t'as une technique ?
Gonéo (2023-12-20 21:45:19+00:00): C'était une erreur de ma part, pour l'instant l'URL spécifique pour chaque point de comptage n'est pas disponible. On retombe systématiquement sur la page générale et la station la plus fréquentée.
L'intérêt est plus limité. Il faut peut-être retirer cette URL en attendant que les URL uniques soient disponibles.
gileri (2023-12-20 21:48:08+00:00): Ok merci pour la réponse, et l'ajout ! Je pense que ça reste utile, ça permet de retrouver assez facilement le compteur. Si un jour on a un permalien on pourra le mettre.

Bonne soirée
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-14 12:20:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356790851
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356790859
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231069933

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
TrickyFoxy (2023-12-14 12:44:05+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145110941
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-14 12:28:05+00:00): see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3993571
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-16 19:03:29+00:00): note that it is not necessary to add names if object has no name

(for example there is no need to add "Tree" for every tree and "Viewpoint" for every viewpoint)
Anzo84 (2023-12-18 19:07:54+00:00): Ok! I understand. Could you please tell me about my other packages of edits? Do you know when they will be considered?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-18 21:13:17+00:00): edits are applied immediately to OSM database
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-18 21:13:48+00:00): you can see your edits at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Anzo84/history (note, there may be delay before they are replicated in Osmand and elsewhere)
Anzo84 (2023-12-20 12:17:25+00:00): Ok, thank you
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-14 12:40:23+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11417005301
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8415923873
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356790851
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231069933

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
lekman100 (2024-04-22 22:10:07+00:00): в Україні для позначенням об"єктів треба використовувати українську мову
okolobasik (2024-04-27 08:38:10+00:00): що вам не сподобалося у назві ЖК?
TrickyFoxy (2023-12-14 12:40:28+00:00): Вы вносите своим скриптом некорретные данные. Тестируйтесь в песочнице https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/
Иван Алексанов (2023-12-14 12:51:59+00:00): Принято, спасибо
rskedgell (2023-12-29 00:33:36+00:00): Could you explain how "busmiles snap to road" means "effectively removed a road from the map by deleting the highway=* tag"?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
literan (2023-12-18 17:02:49+00:00): здесь тоже кривые turn:lanes
TrickyFoxy (2023-12-14 12:44:06+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145110941
gscholz (2023-12-19 08:23:03+00:00): 

Hi Manfutu,
your recent edits have left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=116.97465&lat=40.51409&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145117686

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
TrickyFoxy (2023-12-14 12:47:31+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145111073
osmuser63783 (2023-12-17 10:00:54+00:00): Hallo, bist du dir sicher, dass das das Grab von https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_Br%C3%BCgmann_(Politiker,_1788) ist und nicht das von https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_Br%C3%BCgmann_(Politiker,_1851)?

Ich hatte die Aufgabe auch in Maproulette bekommen und sie eigentlich als zu schwierig markiert und eine Notiz hinterlassen. Ein Mapper aus der Umgebung meinte, laut Inschrift ist es der 1851 geborene. Siehe hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4013474
KasperSFranz (2023-12-17 15:02:56+00:00): Hi,
I changed it to follow the wikidata tag that was added two years ago 

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/8997178685
CirnoBaka (2023-12-14 12:52:05+00:00): Also removed the name "Cycling Track"
gscholz (2023-12-19 08:22:14+00:00): 

Hi Manfutu,
your recent edits have left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=116.97465&lat=40.51409&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145117686

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
AndersAndersson (2023-12-14 14:41:10+00:00): Hej!
Denna ängen korsar samt delar nod med skogen så att multipolygonen inte fungerar.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231091933
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-20 11:53:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11417225861/history - what this Mend object is representing?

Is it some type of shop? If yes, which one?
ElliottPlack (2025-03-22 14:57:37+00:00): Good find. I made this edit with everydoor so it must have been a bug. I don’t remember what shop it is now.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-24 04:15:06+00:00): https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/880 may be of interest (I quoted you in https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/880#issuecomment-2746836504 - I hope that it is fine)

I am trying to figure out how to reduce ratio of such weird fixme objects appearing
ElliottPlack (2025-03-25 04:02:52+00:00): No worries at all, thanks for following up. I wrote a comment on GH.
i2004 (2023-12-14 16:53:59+00:00): te agrege paradas
i2004 (2023-12-14 16:54:06+00:00): en la boca
i2004 (2023-12-15 01:55:07+00:00): por otro lado la 8 y la 5 ya se fusionaron
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-15 06:41:17+00:00): Why did you intentionally map the building as a golf rough?

You've done this multiple times across multiple changesets, including:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145114159
Patchanka (2023-12-15 17:58:22+00:00): bonjour
vous avez créé un doublon. Il y avait déjà à cet endroit une pharmacie "Pharmacie Duclos Grenet". A-t-elle changé de nom ??
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-14 13:40:25+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11408310923
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11408310947
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231099191
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231099192

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-14 13:40:24+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2940303976
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/548544638

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mavl (2023-12-14 16:29:13+00:00): Здравствуйте. Действительно ли у здания номер "32СТРОЕНИЕ1"?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217925713
mavl (2023-12-14 16:32:55+00:00): "50СТРОЕНИЕ5"  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/221368730
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-14 13:50:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11417410293

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Rico557 (2024-01-11 06:59:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146129907
Welshie (2023-12-14 14:10:17+00:00): I may have jumped the gun a bit. as of yesterday lunchtime, only one of the tracks had been connected. Not sure if they've done both yet.
infeeeee (2023-12-14 14:53:30+00:00): Szia!

Az épületek jó helyen voltak, a pontos, georeferált FÖMI-hez voltak igazítva, te meg eltolatad őket a pontatlan Bing-hez.

Ha Bing alapján rajzolsz, akkor azt mindig be kell állítani, hogy ugyanott legyen mint a régi, de pontos FÖMI! Itt a leírás ezt hogy teheted meg az általad használt szerkesztőben: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hu:Beginners_Guide_1.3.5#M%C5%B1holdk%C3%A9p_v%C3%A1laszt%C3%A1sa

Kijavítod ezt?

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-15 06:35:12+00:00): Why did you map the parking lot as a golf rought?  This is incorrect tagging, and I am pretty sure you are just doing it for your golf game.

Do not tag for the renderer.  Ensure you are only using the correct tags.
gscholz (2023-12-19 08:22:37+00:00): 

Hi Manfutu,
your recent edits have left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=116.97465&lat=40.51409&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145117686

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
mavl (2023-12-14 16:17:53+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удаляет реальный адрес. Сообщество договорилось, что адреса, собранные на местности, будет заменять адресами из кадастра?  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261557991/history  
  
Если у этого дома номер не 3, то какой?
desk77 (2023-12-15 03:17:47+00:00): Здравствуйте. Приношу извинения, исправил все ошибки. Плагин, который извлекает номера домов из кадастра не всегда правильно парсит данные. Буду внимательнее проверять отправляемые данные.
mavl (2023-12-15 11:38:41+00:00): Большое спасибо.
Rico557 (2024-02-13 10:39:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9714925357/ эта точка закрыта
kate_rocketdata (2024-02-13 10:52:13+00:00): Добрый день!
Принято, спасибо! Внесем правку.
user_5359 (2023-12-16 07:09:28+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1231115102 (one of over 6.300 objects). What is the mean of the tag Pavimento = 0?
Did you mean building:levels (and the most of the imported values are empty in the source)?

Olá! Por favor, dê uma olhada em http://www.osm.org/way/1231115102 (um dos mais de 6.300 objetos). Qual é a média da tag Pavimento = 0?
Você quis dizer building:levels (e a maioria dos valores importados está vazia na fonte)?
gscholz (2023-12-15 07:59:13+00:00): Hi Manfutu,
your recent edits have left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=116.94115&lat=40.52252&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145114963

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Baloo Uriza (2023-12-14 15:44:24+00:00): Clearly and obviously a house, not a place of business.  Definitely spam.
gscholz (2023-12-19 08:23:29+00:00): 

Hi Manfutu,
your recent edits have left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=116.97465&lat=40.51409&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145117686

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido