piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2026-01-24 11:16:06+00:00): Hello.
You can find the task by downloading the 
Task grid of the project.
Open it in JOSM. after selecting an object in your task area.
After opening it you can switch back to your task area, zoom in to your mapping and switch back to the task grid. There you can read your task square.
It is helpful to install the 'task grid" plugin. When you'v activated it you can easily read the task number.
Best regards
jhingea (2026-01-26 09:51:33+00:00): Hmmm - yes, that's more or less what I did...
But thanks :)
eggie (2026-01-13 20:17:54+00:00): Hoi..
Probeer indien mogelijk op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen. Dus niet op de gebouwomtrek.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2026-01-13 20:49:58+00:00): Info verplaatst naar adresnode
Taya_S (2026-01-14 10:47:47+00:00): Reverted questionable translations.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177214374
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-13 22:03:27+00:00): DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177197890
Pizza Gary (2026-01-15 13:29:21+00:00): Cool
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-14 10:19:15+00:00): Skąd są te tłumaczenia?

http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=177194486
Poparzony (2026-01-14 10:39:28+00:00): Wikipedia
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-14 10:59:10+00:00): A jaką licencję ma Wikipedia?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-14 11:00:41+00:00): Plus, to nie tłumaczenia a transliteracje
Taya_S (2026-01-14 11:17:46+00:00): Indeed. We cannot blindly copy data from wikipedia. 

The first issue is that wikipedia aggregates data from many different sources. Those sources aren't neccecarily compatible with OSM. 

The second issue is that OSM and Wikipedia can have different standards with regards to translations or transliterations of names. 

The third issue (one unrelated to Wikipedia) is that there are no relevant sources cited in any of these changesets.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-14 11:22:02+00:00): also, if someone got blocked they are not allowed to just create new account and continue editing
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-13 22:03:28+00:00): DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177197890
dmjab13 (2026-01-14 18:27:50+00:00): this change should have been applied in small batches locally
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-01-14 08:03:41+00:00): Merhaba. Aynı konuda size birden çok kez yazdım. Lütfen hem ref=* 'e hem de old_ref=* 'e aynı değeri eklemeyiniz.

Aynı konuda önceki yorumlarım:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175999426#c1526714

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175153787#c1517690

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175154889#c1517691

İyi günler.
kitsee (2026-01-13 23:35:16+00:00): Once again, can you please add description changeset comments? "edits" is not useful. The changeset comment field exists for a reason, please use it.
Taya_S (2026-01-14 10:47:48+00:00): Reverted questionable translations.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177214374
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-13 22:03:29+00:00): DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177197890
dmjab13 (2026-01-14 18:27:44+00:00): this change should have been applied in small batches locally
unclamped9 (2026-01-14 19:58:40+00:00): @dmjab13 sorry if my update is not compliant with the rules. 
What do you mean by "small batches", cause I only updated few objects and I reviewed manually everyone of them. 
Could you point me to documentation maybe I if did something wrong ?
dmjab13 (2026-01-14 20:25:02+00:00): osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
unclamped9 (2026-01-14 21:53:16+00:00): OK thanks for the mink, I'll try to split my edits  inti smaller areas next time. 😇
iMacThere4iAm (2026-01-13 21:38:12+00:00): That was quick, I noticed I'd got some left/right tags swapped and went into StreetComplete to fix them. It was confusing when they were already corrected!
gurglypipe (2026-01-13 21:40:26+00:00): heh, fortunate timing with me checking osmcha this evening. I hope I didn’t cause you any problems!
rskedgell (2026-01-14 08:34:02+00:00): (Review requested)

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for updating this.

Where a business has closed, most of the business-specific tags should be deleted, but it's worth using a lifecycle prefix for the "main" tag, for example changing amenity=cafe to disused:amenity=cafe . You can also rename the name=* tag to old_name=* . You can also optionally add check_date=* with the date you surveyed it.

The advantage of doing this is that survey apps like StreetComplete will prompt users to check whether a vacant shop, café, etc. is still vacant, or has a new occupier.

I've updated the tags on this one as an example.

Happy mapping!
Pizza Gary (2026-01-15 13:29:10+00:00): Nice
Yog Sot (2026-01-13 20:53:38+00:00): najwyraźniej nie mozesz robić tych zmian , bo nie ma źródła czy są prawidłowe. 
Więc moze przestaniesz? xD

Przecie serio, po co to robisz, a nie pogadasz z wiarą najpierw? Potem skąd ludzie mają wiedzieć, ze wprowadzasz prawilnie? Nikomu się potem nie chce patrzyć co wprowadzasz, tylko kasują wszystko. Czas tylko marnujesz ;]
muralito (2026-01-14 19:40:41+00:00): Hi. What did you base this change on?
Tzene19 (2026-01-15 21:17:24+00:00): Hi muralito , I changed the classification from pedestrian to residential based on recent Vantor Imagery available to our team, from 2025-12-30. The imagery clearly shows vehicles actively using the road and parked to the side of the road, which indicates this area has regular vehicular access. Hopefully this helps answer your question!
muralito (2026-01-15 21:40:13+00:00): Sure, thanks. Aerial imagery was misleading in this case. Please check street level imagery, as this is clearly a pedestrian way. Vehicles are allowed, but it is a pedestrian road (was pedestrianized a few years ago)
Tzene19 (2026-01-20 23:04:33+00:00): Hello muralito,
Thanks for sharing your knowledge on this. Because you mentioned vehicles are allowed on this road, what would you think about adding motor_vehicle=yes to its extent to indicate this?
muralito (2026-01-21 12:40:00+00:00): The problem with adding that label is that it applies to any motor vehicle, but in practice the reality is more restrictive. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

Obviously motorcar=yes and goods=yes would be OK to add without doubt, also single tracked vehicles, but e.g. hgv are explicitly forbidden.
Tzene19 (2026-01-21 21:38:33+00:00): Hello muralito,
Thanks for providing more information on what types of vehicles are allowed on these ways. I have added the tags you suggested to clarify the usage of this road. Thanks for your help!
eggie (2026-01-13 23:04:38+00:00): Dag Cindayra  De Warnsfeld ... route klopt niet meer en is stuk.
Volgens mij was het hier juist goed getagd door dat paralleltrottoir op te nemen in de tagging van het fietspad zoals gebruikelijk.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-13 23:10:57+00:00): Reverted by changeset #177199452
Het was hier allemaal correct getagd. Die lnagsliggende trottoirs worden gebruikelijk opgenome in de tagging van het fietspad met sixewalk=right.
Er ligt geen groenstrook tussen het fietspad en het trottoir. De standaardkaart laat geen trottoir zien, maar in de data staat het goed. Er zijn veel meer kaarten dan alleen Carto.
Routerelatie is ook weer hersteld.
De voorgaande mappers zijn zeer ervaren en hadden het correct gemapt.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-13 23:17:45+00:00): In English..

The tagging for footway belongs in the main-highway or in this case in the tagging of the cycleway. There is a parallelfootway but not separated by grass of a physical barrier.
So I reverted your changeset and fixed the routerelation (hikingroute)
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2026-01-13 23:26:01+00:00): https://knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/changeset/177199452/6942596
eggie (2026-01-13 23:27:40+00:00): and your changeset https://knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/changeset/177195925/6942493
I had to fix
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-01-14 08:52:00+00:00): Merhaba. Sokak görüntülerinde, bu adreste böyle bir iş yeri görünmüyor. Eklediğiniz internet sitesinde de adres Ankara olarak görünüyor. Bu yeri Ankara'ya değil de Urla'ya yanlışlıkla mı eklediniz? 

İş yerinin adı "Prefabrika" değil mi? Siz "Prefabrik ev" yazmışsınız. Doğrusu nedir?
Prefabrika (2026-01-14 09:32:03+00:00): Prefabrika prefabrik ev doğrusu
Sokak görüntüsünde görünmemesi normal binanın arka cephesinde ufak bir iletişim ofisi var(isterseniz gelin yemek yiyelim) merkezimiz Ankara'da Türkiye geneli servis veriyoruz
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-01-14 09:58:09+00:00): Merhaba. Yorumunuz üzerine, bu yerin adını "Prefabrika Prefabrik Ev" olarak düzelttim. İyi günler.
Udarian (2026-01-13 21:56:11+00:00): this is incorrect, first of all bike lanes should always be tagged and not mapped as separate geometry. second the cycleway was aligned correctly before, there is a cycleway that is separate and one that is a lane, this happens in a few spots in Miami Dade County.

Happy mapping,
Udar
VLD319 (2026-01-13 23:26:27+00:00): Hi Udarian, 

Thank you for letting me know about this mistake. I’ve reverted the changeset to restore the cycleway and sidewalk to the previous setup, which I see now is more accurate for the situation. 

Happy Mapping, 
VLD319
eggie (2026-01-13 21:49:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Dit zal geen ziekenhuis zijn. Ik heb het aangepast naar hospice.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Communit
limes11 (2026-01-13 22:53:26+00:00): Moin, 

der Supermarkt geht über beide Gebäude, dies ist der Haupteingang. Der Markt beginnt nicht erst im nachfolgenden Gebäude. Auf der Rewe-Seite steht er mit Adresse Koblenzer Str. 36, nicht mit Vilichstr. 17.

Wie am besten erfassen ?

Viele Grüße
hfs (2026-01-15 07:13:27+00:00): Hallo limes11,

vielen Dank für Deinen Hinweis. Ich habe den Supermarkt jetzt als zusätzlichen Way erfasst, der über beide Gebäude geht.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1467207990

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177196594

Beste Grüße
hfs
hfs (2026-01-15 07:13:54+00:00): Ups, der zweite Link sollte

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177246610

sein.
limes11 (2026-01-15 12:39:33+00:00): Hallo hfs,

danke dir! Auf die Idee hätte ich tatsächlich auch kommen können, lach.

Viele Grüße
InfosReseaux (2026-02-10 11:39:42+00:00): Bonjour Hugo

Je pense que support=power_pole n'est pas nécessaire dans les cas où le lampadaire est sur un power=pole.
C'est implicite.
HugoC01 (2026-03-07 21:52:22+00:00): Oui c'est bien pour ça que je ne l'ajoute plus du tout depuis plusieurs mois
Layft Greater (2026-03-11 07:26:13+00:00): Dog park is not visible on the aerial. Is it a correct location?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13453499686
vespex (2026-03-11 19:32:40+00:00): Thank you for this reminder. I've fixed this dot.
dmjab13 (2026-01-14 18:27:28+00:00): this change should have been applied in small batches locally
eggie (2026-01-13 21:54:08+00:00): Dag Cobu...  Dit zal geen amenity=clinic zijn. Ik pas even wat aan.

MVG
eggie
Cobu5 (2026-01-18 13:57:28+00:00): Top. Thanks!
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:22:23+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13381608068 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Sign shop in Ankeny IA"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 07:55:22+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671505
(No visible changes after review)
ChrissW-R1 (2026-01-15 20:41:55+00:00): https://osm.org/way/1351164811

What is meant by the tag "lauer"?
DJérémy (2026-01-15 22:44:37+00:00): I’m sorry, it’s "layer"
OSM_RogerWilco (2026-01-15 07:45:52+00:00): Moin ockys,
schau Dir dieses Stück noch an:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/484206616
Das trägt noch den alten Namen.
impiaaa (2026-01-14 23:20:20+00:00): Hello! Please try to keep your edits to either one topic or one area, and use the changeset description to describe in more detail what you changed and why—for example, "Added details to school parking lot," and "Added symbols to routes." Additionally, it looks like relation/108619 has an error, where the "to" and "symbol" fields were combined.
JessAk71 (2026-03-20 18:01:27+00:00): Hello, it looks like your changes here have accidentally enlarged the building footprint to also encompass the parking area which doesn't match the latest imagery. I have gone ahead and updated the building to match the latest imagery. Please be careful when updating building footprints so that they only cover the building structure.
gmar5 (2026-01-14 09:21:21+00:00): Hi, thanks for your edit. I have re-added the "amenity=university" tag. Given the highly fragmented nature of the university, it is best that all its parts retain that tag where appropriate.
Aloneinthewild (2026-01-17 17:26:15+00:00): Thanks for explaining gmar5
Lumikeiju (2026-01-19 23:04:05+00:00): Hi, Mike! While I understand the good intention behind this edit, valid data must not be removed from OpenStreetMap for reasons of political expediency. I have reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177452309. Please refrain from any further similar "protection action" - thank you.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-01-14 13:22:42+00:00): Please note that Bing maps from 2020 needs an offset of 0.6,-1.54. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Montr%C3%A9al#Bing_Maps_Offset

Thanks and have a nice day!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-01-14 13:26:14+00:00): But after verification, it looks quite fine, so it seems you used the correct offset :-)
4004 (2026-01-18 23:54:51+00:00): спасибо за правки. 
как будто великоваты те, что у дороги? 
и у меня на снимках этот https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1466878230/history#map=19/53.726611/23.880879&layers=N только на очень ранней стадии еще.
старт дейт - это дата ввода в конечную эксплуатацию, 2025 пожалуй уже не успели
Sagit_BY (2026-01-20 08:11:24+00:00): ну можно сравнить с другими домами уже готовыми. я описывал как есть, справа на лево если стоять на перекрестке Глухова - Курловича:  два рядовых подъезда вдоль Глухова (их начала первыми строить, было уже этажей 7, а остальных подъездов не было). потом угловой подъезд. потом два рядовых подъезда вдоль Курловича. и замыкает угловой подъезд. а вот этот маленький дом в продолжение буквы П - два рядовых подъезда. по старт дейт понял на будущее
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-01-13 23:06:23+00:00): This was an automatic summary added by Vespucci. The actual edit summary should have been, "Redowngraded tertiary(_link) roads to unclassified since Transit Station Street (and, by extension, 1st Street) are already secondary).
totera (2026-01-14 12:51:59+00:00): Ciao cla88, sostituire il nodo del McDonald's col suo perimetro è indubbiamente un miglioramento, ma sarebbe stato opportuno mantenere tutte le informazioni presenti (vedi https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12312733732/history/1).
Ai fini del mantenimento dello storico, in questi casi poi sarebbe utile riutilizzare il vecchio nodo come nodo del nuovo percorso.
demon_box (2026-01-14 19:58:00+00:00): Ciao Ara05, Benvenuto/a in OSM! Ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti un edificio può avere più entrate e quindi più numeri civici. 
Quindi hai 2 opzioni: 
1. Se conosci esattamente la posizione (entrata) del civico che stai mappando metti tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su un nodo del perimetro dell'edificio (aggiungendo anche il tag entrance sullo stesso nodo);
2. Se invece non hai questa informazione così precisa devi mettere tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su nodo adiacente ma STACCATO dal poligono dell'edificio.
N.B.: Taggare l'indirizzo senza il numero civico (addr:housenumber) è un dato incompleto e perciò inconsistente, inutile. Se non conosci anche il n° civico meglio non mappare nulla.
Ho già proceduto con le correzioni del caso. Grazie e BuonMapping!
Ara05 (2026-01-16 13:08:32+00:00): Ah ok, non sapevo questa cosa. Ti ringrazio!
alpacaMaps (2026-07-28 01:11:31+00:00): This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.

If these cameras are real, please let us know so the map stays accurate. Otherwise, we'd kindly ask that you avoid adding cameras that aren't actually there, and that you remove any temporary or test nodes once you're done.

If this was simply a mistake, no problem at all — just clean up the nodes that don't correspond to a real-world camera, and leave a quick note here so we can help.

Thanks for helping keep OpenStreetMap accurate.

— alpacaMaps
hahae (2026-01-13 23:13:42+00:00): (Duplicate)
mueschel (2026-01-18 10:44:47+00:00): Schau doch mal ins Forum, da wird genau das gerade beredet: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/fahrbahn-uberquerungsstellen-mit-kombination-aus-abgesenkten-und-nicht-abgesenkten-bordstein/99940
NeisBot (2026-01-13 23:29:22+00:00): Hi Efe0414, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 92% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 8 amenity(s)
- 46 building(s)
- 32 highway(s)
- 5 landuse(s)
- 3 leisure(s)
- 1 name(s)
- 2 natural(s)
- 1 office(s)
- 1 source(s)
- 2 sport(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177199801
user_23696588 (2026-01-13 23:34:40+00:00): Hello, I intentionally removed these locations because some of them are not on the map, and others are demolished or unused structures that are still under construction. For example, roads that are not yet open to traffic, or roads that appear in satellite imagery but are actually closed to vehicle traffic or have been removed. Also, ATMs that are no longer in service and have been removed.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-01-14 09:05:15+00:00): Merhaba @Efe0414 . İnşa halindeki yolları silmek doğru değil. İnşa halindeki öğelerin etiketlenmesi hakkında bilgi edinmek için şu sayfaları inceleyebilirsiniz:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction (Bu Viki maddesinde her ne kadar bir ay gibi bir süreden bahsedilmiş olsa da toplulukta bu konuda bir uzlaşı yok gibi duruyor. 6 aydan daha kısa sürecek çalışmaların işaretlenmemesi gerektiğini dile getiren topluluk üyeleri de var:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-mark-a-road-closed-in-open-street-maps/130839/2

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-temporary-road-closure-based-on-government-announcement-copyright-and-data-reliability-issues/136704/3 )

Ayrıca öğelerin geçmişini mümkün olduğuca korumak, mümkünse silmemek de yararlı olacaktır: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

İyi günler.
GerardHog (2026-01-17 16:46:34+00:00): In deze wijzigingsset zijn de door LNH aangekochte percelen vermeld als nature-reserve met de naam Duraaiweid. Die naam is inmiddels gewijzigd in Draaiweid wat de juiste naam is. Het onderliggende waterbassin met de naam Draaiweid was al aanwezig. Gevolg is dat de naam nu twee keer op de kaart voorkomt. 
Is het nu aangegeven nature-reserve ook echt het natuurgebied?
padvinder (2026-01-19 14:29:29+00:00): Wel volgens kaartje in de mij recent toegestuurde natuurgids van Landschap Noord-Holland (geen jaartal van uitgave gevonden).
NB: Dank voor correctie van spelling 'Draaiweid'.
GerardHog (2026-01-20 13:58:11+00:00): Oké, dat is dan duidelijk. Dank voor je reactie.
VLD0251 (2026-01-14 10:45:36+00:00): Hi Thalab12, please be careful with automatic translations, as they can create misunderstandings.
Regarding this object (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22650308), the term 'Apron' refers to the apron (aircraft parking area), not an article of clothing. The translation 'المئزر' (apron) is therefore a technical error; the correct term is 'ساحة المطار'.
furthermore, please do not use the `name` tag for generic descriptions (e.g., 'Main Apron'). This tag is reserved for official proper nouns. the `aeroway=apron` tag is sufficient to define the object (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dapron).
Please check and correct your recent edits. 

Thanks!
Davileci (2026-07-21 00:19:19+00:00): building=train_station debe ser mapeado por separado de la etiqueta disused:railway=station
amosharper (2026-01-14 08:59:07+00:00): Nice. The overall work in Rye and a few nearby towns to fix the misalignment is going to be a huge job, but I applaud any move in that direction!
UtterClutter (2026-01-14 11:54:16+00:00): Thanks for your commet.
I find it very hard to work in that area as the imagery is very poor. The resolution is very bad, and as you say, there is considerable parallax distortion.
I did, however, make use of Cadastral parcels to line things up a bit.
bxl-forever (2026-01-14 01:43:07+00:00): I think there is something wrong with this edit.

This forest path in Sweden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33146743/history

This building in France: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122846267/history

This street in Sacramento, California: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10500786/history

… are all part of your bulk name change, and they are probably incorrect, because it looks like your edit was aimed at changing names on Indonesian roads.

Please review this edit.  At least those 3 objects should be reverted to their previous state.
mаs (2026-01-14 01:56:19+00:00): Reverted 3 botched changes. 177201888
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-03 17:47:13+00:00): Hello!

You used
highway=tertiary-link
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/15962039/history

Have you maybe meant
highway=tertiary_link
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Glassman (2026-02-03 18:44:41+00:00): Thanks for catching that. Fixed
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-03 19:31:21+00:00): And thanks for a fix!
nevw (2026-01-14 02:32:15+00:00): I have reverted this changeset which add a wetland tag to Darwin city poi and added a wetland point to a remote area