piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-02 00:09:39+00:00): Culverts would be a tunnel for the water, not a bridge for the road.  You'd need to map the stream to map the culvert (remove the bridge, then add layer=-1 and tunnel=culvert to the segment of stream going through the culvert)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183253768
Cordless5246 (2026-06-02 00:32:53+00:00): I believe I fixed them. Thank you for explaining that.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183253768
Cordless5246 (2026-06-02 00:36:30+00:00): What makes this unintentional?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183254093
Cordless5246 (2026-06-02 00:43:35+00:00): I think I see it now. I didn't realize I added an extra node. Thanks again.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183254093
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-03 23:38:53+00:00): Поехали теги у https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13888102098
Yurii_l (2026-07-04 11:29:30+00:00): Спасибо, поправил
pwbriggs (2026-05-28 07:16:31+00:00): Is this a dancing school?
Dawid2849 (2026-05-28 14:10:43+00:00): Ta zmiana została częściowo wycofana w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183307493 . access=private jest poprawne, ponieważ jest tu brama: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13891546181. To, że Yanosik nie obsługuje poprawnie takich przypadków to problem aplikacji, a nie danych OSM. Jest to przykład "mapowania pod renderer", a w tym przypadku raczej mapowania pod routing: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Celowo_b%C5%82%C4%99dne_tagowanie_pod_renderer
K_Sakanoshita (2026-05-28 22:19:08+00:00): 建物のマッピングお疲れ様です。
ただ、コメントが「あ」だけなのは他の方に親切では無いと思いますので、簡単にコメントを書いて頂けると幸いです（金沢市の建物追加程度で十分です）。
LordGarySugar (2026-05-29 03:00:04+00:00): What's the source for these housenames here? Your changeset only states that Bing aerials were used.
etgg (2026-05-29 06:44:41+00:00): OS Mastermap
LordGarySugar (2026-05-29 12:07:41+00:00): Were you aware that since most Ordnance Survey maps are Crown Copyright, we absolutely cannot copy from them? We can only use OS maps older than 50 years, such as those hosted by the National Library of Scotland https://maps.nls.uk/os/
etgg (2026-05-29 13:33:29+00:00): Perhaps your time might be better served actively contributing to areas of the map that are not yet complete rather than taking it upon yourself to police and harass other contributors. I am now unsubscribing from this discussion. Please do not contact me again.
LordGarySugar (2026-05-29 14:26:39+00:00): Sorry you feel that way, I'm not trying to harass anybody, I often inform contributors who are copying from incompatible sources including Google Streetview and planning documents, so that they don't spend their time on edits that end up getting reverted and redacted for infringing on copyright. Multiple new editors have thanked me for pointing out their sources were incompatible and have continued mapping using surveys and acceptable methods. I'm sorry you feel personally attacked, but using the Ordnance Survey Mastermap to map is categorically not allowed and it's not my fault that it's the case. It was quite clear that you have been copying from Ordnance Survey, and I'm not the only one that could work that out. You can clearly see I have spent lots of time contributing to mapping blank areas of the map, and I fail to see how leaving comments for other mappers is a bad use of time when it can help improve the quality of their mapping or ensure it is compliant with copyright.
Regards,
LGS
StC (2026-05-27 21:15:30+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
felipeeugenio (2026-05-27 16:03:26+00:00): Hola.
Para los bosques, viñas y plantaciones de árboles frutales puede funcionar hacer polígonos tan grandes, pero el farmland es mejor dividirlos por potreros. los dibujos que haces están bien definidos, pero potencialmente, si alguien quiere dividirlos por lo que está plantado (crop=), te los va a borrar enteros.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183256312
trichocereus (2026-05-28 13:40:44+00:00): Ok, voy a delimitar mejor los próximos polígonos.
mavl (2026-06-10 06:17:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906066 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20776].
mavl (2026-06-10 06:44:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906936 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping.
dieterdreist (2026-05-27 21:56:26+00:00): die Nummer war nicht überflüssig sondern ziemlich wahrscheinlich an dem Gebäudeeingang mit dieser Nummer. Überflüssig wäre entweder der komplette Node (sofern er keinen Eingang repräsentiert, anderenfalls sollte man entrance=* ergänzen), oder eben gar nichts.
ika-chan! (2026-05-28 09:56:21+00:00): Please explain why you add a filter road that does not exist (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1523547019)? The road is actually blocked off because of the new motorway.
LordGarySugar (2026-05-28 01:03:56+00:00): Hi, I was working on adding a lot of house numbers from out of copyright ordnance survey at the same time as you added a lot of uprns & postcodes in Tring, this caused about 600 conflicts and josm would only let me resolve to my versions or yours. I resolved to my versions because I assumed that it wouldn't be too much trouble to reimport the uprns and postcodes for the affected houses. You can see my changeset here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183277949 which has the uprns and postcodes that were overwritten by conflict resolution. Hopefully it's not too much of a pain to go over this area again. Personally I like to do a big batch of housenumbers from ooc maps after mapping a section of buildings, so clearly that is likely to happen at the same time as I am still working on the new buildings. Thanks for your work. 🙏
rskedgell (2026-05-28 06:57:59+00:00): Hi, sorry about creating the conflicts. If I manage to hit an area you're still working on and it's easier to revert my changeset(s) than to resolve a large number of conflicts, please feel free to do so.
LordGarySugar (2026-05-28 16:50:57+00:00): Thanks for being understanding, it's annoying because my addition of addr:housenumber and addr:street didn't conflict with your additions of uprn and addr:postcode, but josm doesn't have a way to merge two sets of tags together easily. Thankfully I could at least resolve all conflicts to my versions in 1 go instead of going through them one by one.
flohoff (2026-05-27 16:39:15+00:00): Thanks for Fixing this - It fixes routing issues TomTom caused which i already commented in the responsible changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182987151

Flo
LiudmilaBareika (2026-05-28 07:12:32+00:00): Hello, flohoff! Thank you so much for your kind feedback and engagement, it's much appreciated! Best regards, Liudmila
dmjab13 (2026-05-27 17:52:46+00:00): please avoid submitting changesets that span such a large area
Lostmonkey (2026-05-27 19:48:10+00:00): As I mention on the changeset deleting the stray node from this changeset that ended up in the US, I have no idea why it happened. I was editing a small area in Denmark and never left it (at least not in the visible editor window).
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-27 16:22:54+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1523555538

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
gscholz (2026-06-14 07:20:19+00:00): Hi Алексей Выскребенцев,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=43.68963&lat=42.99464&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you plase fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about how to edit hiking routes properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking

Kind regards
Guido
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-27 18:11:43+00:00): #Spam
RubenKelevra (2026-07-02 11:41:07+00:00): Hi Geim,

mind to explain your rationale behind deleting sidewalk=no tags from highway=tertiary and highway=secondary etc.?

Nothing about this feels excessive to me, so your comment doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
Geim (2026-07-02 15:43:17+00:00): Een trunk heeft nooit een sidepath: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100595725/history
sidepath=no voegt daar niets toe.
RubenKelevra (2026-07-02 16:52:30+00:00): Good day Geim, 

please provide responses in a language I can understand, if possible. Nederlands is not one of them. 

In regards to your argument, that you removed the sidewalk=no tags because "trunks have never sidewalks" ä, this might be true locally, but project wide something like foot=no is only implied for highway=motorway, not highway=trunk.

If your argument is that pedestrians are legally not allowed on the highway=trunk roads, then this should be mapped as an access restriction, by setting foot=no or motorroad=yes. And I agree, this would make the sidewalk=no redundant. But this hasn't been mapped. 

Your argument, if true would cover the 4 highway=trunk and maybe the highway=trunk_link. But I specifically asked about the other 7 roads which are not highway=trunk*, but highway=secondary and highway=tertiary etc.

Please provide the actual tagging rationale for removing sidepath=no from the secondary/tertiary/primary roads specifically. 

Cheers, 

Ruben
Geim (2026-07-02 17:48:46+00:00): "Nederlands is not one of them."
Gewoon google translate gebruiken, werkt prima.
Als je denk dat ik e.e.a. verkeerd gemapt heb, dan sorry en draai het gerust weer terug.
RubenKelevra (2026-07-02 18:20:30+00:00): Would be great if you could use Google Translate in the future then, since it seems to work great for you.

Your changes have been reverted.

Cheers, 

Ruben
Layft Greater (2026-06-03 10:20:07+00:00): Why "place=island;islet"?
Lyokoï (2026-06-03 13:09:16+00:00): Maybe an error, I check, thanks for the message
Lyokoï (2026-06-03 13:14:09+00:00): Hello, I don’t know where did you find that, there is no 'place=island;islet' on this island : https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/35.181417/32.607332
Lyokoï (2026-06-03 13:14:52+00:00): This the islet that I create and modify
Layft Greater (2026-06-28 22:02:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3263732/history/191
ChrissW-R1 (2026-05-28 10:22:20+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/5313708
kingkingHK (2026-05-28 02:49:58+00:00): Did you fix anything? Why did you remove the `fixme=`?
kingkingHK (2026-05-30 06:23:34+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183384656
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-27 16:22:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/269151713

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
whb (2026-05-28 15:06:52+00:00): Das war ein Fachbetrieb für Sanitär, Heizung und Blechnerei:
https://web.archive.org/web/20200803172015/http://www3.horn-shk.de/
tyr_asd (2026-05-28 15:53:31+00:00): Aha, danke. In dem ehemaligen Laden ist jetzt das "Cafe am Brunnen".
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-02 12:39:24+00:00): Uuh, do you have a photo?  To my knowledge, the OTA never uses bollards on closed ramps, but does use normal roadblocks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183261351
Tinetto (2026-06-03 12:18:03+00:00): Hi  Baloo Uriza, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
Tinetto (2026-06-04 16:20:02+00:00): Hi Baloo Uriza, thank you for your inquiry and your insights about the local practices within OTA. I applied the bollard tags based on TomTom’s street-level imagery which is available for OSM edits internally. You can see the image at the location here: Source Request - OSM Changeset: 183261351 · tomtom-international open-data · Discussion #195
Based on the examples on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier=bollard, I decided use bollard tags. Please review and let me know if any further changes or reverts would be required.
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-05 00:09:54+00:00): Was there supposed to be a URL in that?
Tinetto (2026-06-05 10:10:34+00:00): Hi Baloo Uriza,

Apologies for missing it. Please find the URL below: https://github.com/tomtom-international/open-data/discussions/195
MassCartog (2026-05-28 22:59:07+00:00): Hello welcome to OSM. This road is visible in satellite imagery from 3 days ago. Could you describe farther what you mean when you say "planted over with grass"? Thanks
EvanRoss41 (2026-05-28 23:20:43+00:00): A few hundred feet of the road has now been removed and replaced with dirt and grass seed on the northern most part of the road. So it no longer goes through while the rest of the road is there it dead ends and has plans to be removed the rest of the way soon.
EvanRoss41 (2026-05-28 23:29:37+00:00): I can provide images of the part of the road that was removed along with photos of the tire tracks from Amazon drivers getting stuck in our yard after it rained when they attempted to drive through the no long road.
MassCartog (2026-05-29 03:57:19+00:00): Thanks for the reply, No need for pictures, I believe you. I'm going to restore the part of the road that still exists to the south. When it is actually removed from the ground feel free to remove the rest of it! Thanks
rajdhani (2026-05-28 08:05:37+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 183290276; 183290513
mavl (2026-06-10 06:44:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906936 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping.
mavl (2026-06-10 06:18:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906066 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20776].
DeFra85 (2026-05-28 17:08:06+00:00): Ahoi, hier passt was nicht mit der Relation:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/953758572/history das ist zu viel
- im Bereich Kniebrink und Horsthöhe sind die Wegstücke nicht in der richtigen Reihenfolge
Rumburak57 (2026-05-30 13:38:03+00:00): Danke für die Info. Ich werde in den nächsten tagen mal etwas sortieren.
mavl (2026-06-10 06:17:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906066 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20776].
mavl (2026-06-10 06:44:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906936 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping.
mavl (2026-06-10 06:18:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906066 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20776].
mavl (2026-06-10 06:44:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906936 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping.
gurglypipe (2026-05-27 16:51:29+00:00): Thanks for updating this after the TomTom editors realigned the roads through the middle of the hedges and pavements.

Why is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1523596804 access=no? Has it been closed off temporarily (or permanently) to prevent rat-running?

If so it might be helpful to add a note= tag to it explaining the tagging so that it’s easier for someone to update it consistently once the realignment works are all complete. Ta
gurglypipe (2026-05-27 16:52:12+00:00): whoops, I meant motor_vehicle=no, not access=no. Same question though
Pete Owens (2026-05-27 17:31:53+00:00): Originally I thought it was going to be a temporary restriction. But, it has been blocked for two years now and there is a brand new sign at the south end of the road saying no through road except for cycles - so it looks to be permanent.
gurglypipe (2026-05-27 17:35:46+00:00): I guess we’ll have to see what happens when all work is complete.

Perhaps it would be worth adding bicycle=yes to the road, and adding a barrier= node in the appropriate place describing how the road is blocked, to make it clearer the reason for motor_vehicle=no?
AndresDuhour (2026-07-22 20:12:00+00:00): Hola! te escribo porque los nombres en general en OSM no deben tener abreviaturas. Te copio la recomendación que se encuentra en la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Abreviaturas_(no_hacer_esto). Voy a corregir algunas en La Rioja mientras tanto. Saludos! Andrés
cubbe8 (2026-05-27 23:48:17+00:00): Hello, in this changeset you have created overlapping ways that cause routing issues.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183279436
user_5359 (2026-05-30 06:01:01+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291205036 ( one of seven ways).What is the man of the tag ré? Did you mean ref?
rarad74 (2026-05-27 17:13:05+00:00): Hi Please DO NOT draw using BING Maps because are the oldest - over 10 years and not well positioned. ESRI standard is recommended.
nighter_watch (2026-05-27 17:22:37+00:00): Hi, I thought bing was the only option, thanks for pointing it out.
nighter_watch (2026-05-27 17:23:34+00:00): What should i do now though ? I already made around 376 nodes here
rarad74 (2026-05-27 17:39:05+00:00): There are trwo options. I will try a revert for the entire changeset, or if you have time, based on esri standard imagery delete all tracks that not exist anymore. Track in most of times are not permanent roads. Many of them are temporar agricultural dirt roads , which at tome point will be disused.
rarad74 (2026-05-27 17:16:04+00:00): Please DO NOT DRAW any tracks using Bing Imagery. Today almost all tracks you drawed, does not exist enymore. You flooded the map with useless data.
nighter_watch (2026-05-27 17:30:03+00:00): I just changed to ESRI chill, and most of the tracks are still the same i just need to edit a few houses and re map a few tracks
rarad74 (2026-05-27 17:47:43+00:00): Here ai already delete some of them. because of tha you dont see them.
BCNorwich (2026-05-28 05:56:52+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've mapped Mopes Farm as a residential area (landuse=residential) therefore it should only cover the residential area.

Tim's Dairy is mapped as an industrial area
(landuse=industrial). Thus should not be part of a residential area.

I've redrawn the residential area to include only the dwellings and their curtilage. I've also redrawn the buildings to cover the actual building footprint.

Regards Bernard.
Paul Einstein (2026-05-28 10:36:13+00:00): Thanks for your help. I am an OSM novice.
hoserab (2026-05-27 16:46:02+00:00): Whoops, sorry; not that changeset, this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183190762
Pavel239 (2026-06-20 17:33:34+00:00): Откуда информация про новые съезды с КАДа? Опять фантазируете?!
Константин Гам (2026-06-21 10:13:47+00:00): С местности.... Там и схема есть.
Константин Гам (2026-06-21 10:15:52+00:00): Была заметка чья то ещё недели 3 назад, я взял и скатался и Вау)
Сами way надо добавить, для полноты картины... Пока руки не дошли
Константин Гам (2026-06-21 10:17:14+00:00): А про фантазёра, кто бы говорил))) с дивана слезать надо почаще, тогда и вопросы возникать не будут)))
Константин Гам (2026-06-22 12:24:41+00:00): А, если, кроме шуток, поискал деталей, видимо неправильно описал, ибо там речь была про возможность выезда на КАД, а я написал как "развязка с кад", исправил на нейтральное, пока...
Pavel239 (2026-06-22 13:02:31+00:00): Ч.т.д. - фантазёр.
Но хорошо, что хотя бы исправились.
Ещё уберите "строящуюся" вторую очередь Усть-Славянского щоссе, не позорьтесь! Там нет работ по строительству никаких и тем более не было 2-3 года назад, даже в проекте!
Константин Гам (2026-06-22 15:11:05+00:00): я там лично ездил по следам техники... Вот чес слово.

Может это был какой-то подготовительный этап.

Собственно никто не запрещяет исправлять друг за другом, если есть на то основания.
Константин Гам (2026-06-22 15:14:14+00:00): и собственно те следы отчётливо видны на esri... я застал именно этот момент.
Может изыскатели, но визуально было похоже на вполне конкретные земляные работы по подготовке ... я там бываю не часто, поэтому сейчас не знаю актуальный статус.
baprischka (2026-05-27 16:55:09+00:00): *quasi finita
Leo Slager (2026-05-30 10:27:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2026-05-30 10:32:09+00:00): Dag michael,

Alle begin is moeilijk.
Zo een weg in een parkeerplaats krijgt vrijwel altijd de tag
Highway=service
en
service=parking_aisle

En wegen zijn standaard voor twee richtings verkeer, dis oneway=no hoeft er dan niet op.

Verander je het zelf ?
mueschel (2026-05-27 18:13:49+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
You used a strange tag "tern:trail_quality " here. 
What is it supposed to mean?

Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.
This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.
ayanbs (2026-05-27 19:01:14+00:00): Hi mueschel, thanks for the welcome and the heads up! I have changed the "tern:trail_quality" tags to something described in the Wiki.
mueschel (2026-05-27 19:46:11+00:00): Very good, 'tracktype' is the most common but also quite coarse tag.
If you want to add further details you might want to look into 'surface' and 'smoothness'.
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2026-06-08 06:35:41+00:00): Hola,

El río Pirón no es intermitente en el recorrido que lo has marcado, revierto esa etiqueta.

Un saludo,
Arturo.
mueschel (2026-06-02 07:43:29+00:00): Hi,
there is an ongoing proposal for data center tagging - maybe you want to contribute or adapt the tags here to the ones proposed?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Data_center_technical_attributes
rskedgell (2026-05-27 22:24:38+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The building=* polygon should apply to the outline of the buildings, and only the buildings.

If you want to add tags, there is place=plot but this isn't used much in the UK. If you enable the "OSMUK Cadastral Parcels" overlay in the iD editor, you can see most property boundaries.

I've updated Mopes Farm Cottage, 4 Mopes Farmhouse, Orchard Cottage and Kinsella Cottage in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183277609

If you'd like any help, please feel free to ask.
rskedgell (2026-05-27 22:26:50+00:00): * "if you want to add tags [to the whole property extent]" - but you probably don't for residential properties.
Paul Einstein (2026-05-28 10:28:05+00:00): Thanks for the updates. As you can see I am an OSM novice.
rskedgell (2026-05-28 11:31:33+00:00): Not a problem. You're not the first person to do this and you won't be the last, but you're still making useful contributions to the OSM detail in your area. Happy mapping!