piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CurlingMan13 (2025-08-04 17:33:52+00:00): Thanks for the message.  Was up camping with no cell service.

Yes, that is indeed a mistake, but it should be removed.  It was untagged line that I was trying to remove, and for some reason or another, I had to assign a tag, so I did bike path.  The one segment you found must have gotten away.

I can remove later if you don't beat me to it.
emersonveenstra (2025-08-04 18:18:37+00:00): No worries! I removed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169970613#map=17/43.780360/-86.203307
CurlingMan13 (2025-08-04 18:30:33+00:00): Sweet!  Thank you!  I wish iD made it easier for "advanced" editors to remove untagged lines that extend way beyond the zoom level.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-08-08 10:50:26+00:00): Do not make changes in such a big area. You were using JOSM so you should know what you were doing.
sis651 (2025-08-09 00:11:38+00:00): Aah, yes. The real area is actually small but I just changed a few nodes abroad so that it seems like an intercontinental changeset.
user_5359 (2025-07-29 06:42:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You move a node more than 100 meters, crossing other streets.

When copying from other maps, you should also pay attention to licensing rights. Google prohibits copying and would immediately delete any such content.
b-jazz (2025-07-30 15:05:44+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892128195

As mentioned in my previous comments on a change you made, the lines that define fairways and greens must not cross over each other like you've done here at the green/hole named "Beginning" and "Double Green". Please make sure you clean those up and refrain from cross golf course areas like this in the future. Thanks.
Langlaeufer (2025-08-12 14:37:18+00:00): Restrictions sind nicht notwendig wenn sich die regelung auch durch access oder onway ergibt.
kabelhaai (2025-08-06 00:11:56+00:00): Was already available? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13013018301
user_5359 (2025-07-29 06:31:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Your business isn't this marked area, we need a address. I revert your change set.
aharvey (2025-07-31 03:28:42+00:00): hi you've added `psv:lanes=*` to the route relation, that tag is only applicable to the actual road ways with highway=* where you want to specify bus lanes. I've removed it from the relation but you may want to correctly add it to the road segment again.
aharvey (2025-07-31 03:30:45+00:00): hi you've added psv=yes to the train line here which isn't quite right so I've removed it.
stasiu512 (2025-07-31 08:59:20+00:00): Cześć, zajmę się tematem
Bartekkmee (2025-07-31 09:43:28+00:00): Świetnie! Trochę już linii poprzekuerowywałem na odpowiednie pasy, ale nadal daleko od perfekcji.
stasiu512 (2025-07-31 09:55:41+00:00): część teraz już zrobiłem, reszte relacji dokończę dzisiaj bo chwilowo muszę odejść od kompa, dzięki za współprace!
impiaaa (2025-07-29 17:16:12+00:00): Hello, please use the changeset description to describe what you changed and why. For example, "Added addresses to parking lots around stadium, from survey." You can read more examples here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Thanks!
Yog Sot (2025-07-29 11:04:13+00:00): przecie w1418251049 jest orzez środek pola, wiezysz w to, że on asię utrzyma zaraz po zbiorach i orce przedzimowej? ;d
Mercanto123 (2025-07-29 11:15:18+00:00): Takie orane ścieżki są też w innych miejscach Poznania i jakoś na mapie są od lat. Ta wygląda tak, jakby była od lat używanym skrótem, sprawdź sam :)
keimo (2025-08-04 08:20:02+00:00): Hopeakuun pysäkki (E3273) näyttäisi reittioppaan mukaan olevan käytössä?
liljaadeliina (2025-08-07 04:35:05+00:00): Okei, kiitos tiedosta, lisäilen sen takaisin, kun ehdin.
user_8655426 (2025-08-07 12:16:35+00:00): こんにちは。
OpenStreetMap (OSM) は現実の世界に存在する地物をマッピングし、正確で最新の地図をつくっていくプロジェクトです。(real and current) また、OSMの地図データはゲームだけでなく、さまざまなアプリやウェブサイトなどで使用されています。

OSMに架空の地物を追加したり、既存のデータを実際とは異なるものに変更したりしないでください。よろしくお願いします。(事実と異なる不正な編集を行ったユーザーは、ブロックされる可能性があります。)

・「ようこそ！」
https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome

・JA:破壊行為
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:破壊行為

---

・JA:初心者ガイド
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:初心者ガイド

・learnOSM (ビギナーズガイド)
https://learnosm.org/ja/beginner/
user_8655426 (2025-08-07 12:21:51+00:00): Reverted (vandalism)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170103683
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169653231
TheNightRider (2026-02-26 20:06:39+00:00): @tnsaurez: If the space was still disused, the tags  disused:brand:wikidata, disused:brand, and disused:name would be OK. Now that Crossroads is in there, the space is not disused anymore, but we could add old_name=Buffalo Exchange. Want to do it? I've got two old_name tags (with dates) on Miya Moon just to the south: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5450285858
tnsuarez (2026-02-26 20:10:16+00:00): @TheNightRider ooo, good call! Feel free to make the change, otherwise I can.
TheNightRider (2026-02-26 20:58:35+00:00): I can do it, but I'd like to add a dated old_name, like old_name:2010-2025=Buffalo Exchange or just the closing date like old_name:-2025=Buffalo Exchange. Do you remember when it closed?
Also, do you know when Crossroads opened? Then we can add start_date=2025 or whatever it was.
TheNightRider (2026-02-26 21:01:21+00:00): Wow, I had it in my bookmarks that Buffalo Exchange closed July 2020! Do you know what year it opened? I forgot what it was before.
tnsuarez (2026-02-26 21:10:03+00:00): Oh nice! Unfortunately I don't know the dates 😞
TheNightRider (2026-02-26 21:13:36+00:00): No worries! I'll put in what I have. BTW, I tweaked the location to be more in the center of the space instead of right on Broadway. This is why OSM is great. Google will never have this type of info.
tnsuarez (2026-02-26 21:19:21+00:00): Perfect! Thank you! And for real, OSM is goated haha
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-27 03:12:40+00:00): Removed SEO spam tags, fixed address and opening hours and added/corrected other tags for POI in changeset 183235506

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183235506
Tomas09 (2025-11-18 22:11:59+00:00): Wat een haat... Ik heb opzich best wel moeite erin gestopt om deze paden goed op de kaart te zetten
Tomas09 (2025-11-18 22:15:34+00:00): (misschien is wat ik hiermee bedoel een beetje onduidelijk omdat ik met vrienden zo praat die het dan snappen) Wat ik bedoel is om te vragen waarvoor u zo vaak mijn correct gemappede dingen verwijderd? Er is helemaal niks mis met wat ik heb gedaan. (wel goed gedaan met de tags veranderen naar sidewalk=yes)
berndw (2025-07-29 07:57:20+00:00): Nicht Koblenz, BONN ;-)
bdiscoe (2025-09-11 18:55:22+00:00): Hi, please use fewer nodes for your ways with irrigation=pivot.  I have to come thru after you, and reduce them to a 30cm threshold.  There is nothing in an agricultural area which is more precise than 30cm.
mavl (2025-07-29 14:47:11+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет непрямоугольное здание. На спутниковых снимках Mapbox и Esri видно, что это обычное прямоугольное здание.
geo_ozon (2025-08-06 14:34:00+00:00): Исправлено, спасибо!
rempshaener (2025-07-29 16:09:37+00:00): Hallo,
Taxistände haben in der Regel keine Adresse, daher bitte wieder entfernen. Das ist auch nicht weiter schlimm, dadurch "fehlt" nichts.
Viele Grüße
GermanTaxi (2025-08-20 08:59:36+00:00): Salve, 

danke für die Anfrage. 

Das sehe ich anders. Auch Halteplätze werden auch bei uns mit Adressen im System hinterlegt. Dies ist auch erforderlich, wenn Hilfskräfte (bei Notfällen) zum Standort geführt werden müssen.

VG
GT
rempshaener (2025-08-20 19:33:03+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170712329
DD1GJ (2025-08-21 08:05:21+00:00): Dann verwende bitte object:city, object:street, usw. Ich habe den Eintrag entsprechend angepasst
GermanTaxi (2025-08-21 15:53:22+00:00): Danke
DD1GJ (2025-08-21 20:16:25+00:00): Gern geschehen. Ih habe alle Deine Einträge entsprechend angepasst,:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170798628

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170798293
Yog Sot (2025-07-29 11:47:38+00:00): zauwazyłeś, że pokasowałeś ściezki i przegrodziłeś płotem, ale nie podałeś źródła wizyty w terenie?
Ja na orto widze natomiast iz płot przebiega inaczej i ściezki też niż co zrobiłeś. 
Spytaj się mapowicza tych ścieżek, to ci powie, że tam był, choc wiem, krzywo zmapował, co było do poprawienia, nie kasowania
Mercanto123 (2025-07-29 12:19:36+00:00): Potwierdzam, byłem na miejscu, przeszedłem się tymi ścieżkami. Aim, przejdź się tam i sam zmapuj.
Aim311_ (2025-07-29 14:28:54+00:00): @ Mercanto123 W sensie wdarłeś się na ogrodzony, prywatny teren magazynu, czy płatnego parkingu?
Aim311_ (2025-07-29 14:34:53+00:00): Dobra poprawiłem zakres magazynu.
Mercanto123 (2025-07-29 15:03:15+00:00): Nie ma potrzeby nigdzie się wdzierać. Ścieżka jest po zewnętrznej stronie ogrodzenia.
Yog Sot (2025-07-29 20:25:14+00:00): Aim, nie poprawiłes wszystkiego
Czy to serio musi być tak, że musze po tobie sprzatać?
Mogłes przy okazji zwiększyc precyzje ściezki, bo owszem kolega tego nie zrobił. 
Jak nic nie zrobisz, naturalnie ponownie sam to zrobię.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-23 06:04:46+00:00): DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173656608
rempshaener (2025-07-29 16:12:46+00:00): Hallo,
ein amenity=telephone ist ein öffentliches Telefon, keine Rufsäule.
Ich fürchte, dafür gibt es kein Tagging.
Ist aber auch bereits als Taxistand erfasst, also bitte wieder entfernen.
Viele Grüße
aceman444 (2025-09-21 09:57:26+00:00): Dakujem, prosim pouzivajte vsak spravny zapis otvaracich hodin, tu napr. bez medzier okolo pomlcky.
aceman444 (2025-09-21 09:59:46+00:00): A este ta pomlcka ma byt obycajne minus, nekopirujte vselijake znaky z webstranok podnikov.
Filip009CZ (2025-09-21 10:02:20+00:00): Pardon, občas sa chybyčka vloudí.
BCNorwich (2025-07-29 13:45:41+00:00): Hi, Can you please state why you've removed most of the buildings, paths and grass areas within the residential area of Way: 866887037?  It's here:- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93523965#map=18/51.491531/-0.164950&layers=N

Regards Bernard.
Jordi MF (2025-07-30 21:03:52+00:00): Hola Toni,

Quin tipus d'atracció, visitada freqüentment per turistes, és este element que has anomenat amb el número "15"?
recrayon (2025-07-29 10:07:05+00:00): changeset comment got mixed up for some reason
ordinatous (2025-08-06 16:41:41+00:00): Hi,
please stop adding path anywhere . You saw the pole at the bottom with the red rubbon, it doesn't mean there is a path.
If the trail_visibility is horrible there a reason why, the path return to nature, and there is protected area for wild .
Drahflow (2025-08-06 21:03:24+00:00): I didn't see a pole at the bottom but a perfectly visible trail (as indicated in the changeset).

It kind-of tapered after a while and became hard/impossible to see further into the forest.

I noticed "protected areas for wildlife" signs on the west side of the valley, but none around the forest the path is in. But you probably have much better information about that. Maybe delete the "trail_visibility: horrible" part and put an exit:no at the last node? (So OSM users can see that a path _starts_ at the bottom but will not cleanly reach the top....)
Drahflow (2025-08-06 21:06:56+00:00): Nevermind, I see you already did that.

Thank you :)
AndreaDp271 (2025-07-29 09:09:52+00:00): Thank you for your contribution but try to make smaller changeset areas. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169658322
silversurfer83 (2025-07-29 14:20:48+00:00): Hi Christian,

are you sure about the name here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13033480903 ?

cheers
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169658322
StC (2025-07-30 10:03:50+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
Hidden Mountain (2025-07-29 16:19:00+00:00): Добрый вечер, я бы все же использовал тег natural=wood для дикой зоны леса, плюс было бы здорово указывать тип листвы. Если не указать, что это хвойные, то не во всех картах полигон отразится со структурой деревьев, т.е. будет просто как монотонный темнозеленый и не сразу поймешь, что перед тобой лес.
Ruslan Fatih (2025-07-30 04:49:29+00:00): Да, срасибо. А вот тип могу указать только те которые 100% знаю. Со спутника особо видно.
Hidden Mountain (2025-07-30 05:06:00+00:00): Конечно, если есть сомнения, то можно просто указать смешанные и будет тоже красиво)
user_5359 (2025-07-31 18:01:30+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/173559821, http://www.osm.org/way/173559818. What is the mean of the tag Түрген = КВ-64?
Ruslan Fatih (2025-08-01 02:18:08+00:00): Oh, my bad. I will fix it.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-29 09:30:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10269216194
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418281885

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
joelmatos (2025-07-29 09:53:46+00:00): Mieszkam obok tego budynku. Wszystko w porządku, pozdrawiam
Sylabowy Kot (2025-07-29 11:25:59+00:00): Możesz mieszkać, ale wypadało by zobaczyć, o czym mówi bot - czy zasadna jest wg ciebie jest dwukrotna obecność adresu Kopciuszka 2B? Dosłownie obok miałeś węzeł, który powinieneś wgrać w rozpoznany obiekt budowlany, by systemy miały mniejsze podejrzenia, że coś jest nie tak.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-07-29 11:28:02+00:00): Na działce nie ma raczej innego budynku, więc nie ma potrzeby istnienia węzła adresowego na obszarze oraz ten adres w tagach budynku na jego terenie, oba oddzielnie.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-07-29 11:23:14+00:00): Przez private rozumiesz tutaj pracowników szpitala, odwiedzających hospitalizowanych, pacjentów kliniki przyszpitalnej czy karetki?
Gucio10 (2025-07-29 11:25:34+00:00): Tak, ale przede wszystkim nie mnie, który został tam na rowerze poprowadzony przez mapy jako droga zwykła.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-07-29 11:35:37+00:00): Zrozumiałe :D
Jordi MF (2025-07-30 21:04:20+00:00): 

Hola Toni,

Quin tipus d'atracció, visitada freqüentment per turistes, és este element que has anomenat amb el número "30"?
anastasia_ (2025-08-05 02:54:38+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Подскажите, пожалуйста, зачем вы удалили с жк тег place=neighborhood?
Константин Гам (2025-08-05 05:14:14+00:00): Здравствуйте! Потому что этот тег к ЖК не имеет отношения. Он для районов типа "Московская слобода", а жк и place вовсе из разных миров.
anastasia_ (2025-08-05 08:16:08+00:00): Ознакомьтесь, пожалуйста: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:place#%D0%97%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B2_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%B8 
place=neighborhood - не про районы.
Константин Гам (2025-08-05 09:19:36+00:00): Ознакомьтесь с данными карты. Криво переведенная вики, не весомый аргумент
Константин Гам (2025-08-05 09:20:09+00:00): Практика использования тега в РФ иная
Константин Гам (2025-08-05 09:28:44+00:00): Даже если не историческийе районы, как гласит справка, но и не жк. они не place вообще никакой, ибо они валидируются по оф. документам...
Jordi MF (2025-07-30 21:04:12+00:00): 

Hola Toni,

Quin tipus d'atracció, visitada freqüentment per turistes, és este element que has anomenat amb el "inici"?
Larmax (2025-07-29 20:30:07+00:00): Lisäsit taas vinossa olevia rakennuksia, joissa on tällä kertaa kaikissa sama rakennustunnus?
liljaadeliina (2025-08-13 06:49:56+00:00): Tuo rakennustunnus oli uusi asia minulle, en tiennyt sen olemmassaolosta, mutta se tietenkään tee vinossa olevien rakennusten lisäystä oikeaksi.

Lisäilen välillä näitä, kun mietin, että on parempi lisätä rakennus/tie/piste, vaikka se ei olisi täysin oikein. Olen miettinyt myös, että jos kyseessä on esim. pihavaja tms., niin sillä ei ole niin paljon väliä, jos se on vinossa tms.
Larmax (2025-08-13 16:21:52+00:00): On eri asia lisätä rakennus esimerkiksi vinossa puutteelisten ilmakuvien vuoksi, kuin laiskuuden.
andygol (2025-08-08 18:57:00+00:00): Див. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Назви#Скорочення
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169661626
Claudius Henrichs (2025-07-29 13:26:21+00:00): Hi there, What's your reason for deleting the separate stop areas for the metro and tram stations at Wilhelminaplein? According to the definition of a stop area in OSM I would expect those to be compromised of separate stop areas. One hint is that on Wikidata there's separate items for both:
Metro station: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2169211
Tram stop: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q111430313

I would suggest to revert this change, restore the separate stop areas on the surface (tram+bus) and underground (metro).
pfhllnts (2025-07-29 13:38:58+00:00): Hi, first of all thanks for staying attentive as to possible mistakes!

I didn't know about the best practise of keeping separate stop relations, I'd assumed that it being an interchange station it would make sense to group them together.

I'll undo this in a moment.
mxvsxx (2025-07-29 09:59:45+00:00): These are back to back terraced houses
NeisBot (2025-07-29 10:03:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-31 19:31:32+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/169662823
nevw (2025-07-29 14:19:02+00:00): Hi, I reverted this as you need to place it at the physical location of your business instead near a city street and rail intersection.
mfdz (2025-12-29 08:20:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/662122238 befindet sich auf level -3 und sollte sich https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13033637611 nicht mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/583365927 teilen
Mammi71 (2026-05-24 07:45:48+00:00): What's the source for ele=2?
Larmax (2025-07-29 19:38:33+00:00): Joudun nyt taas palauttamaan tekemiäsi muutoksia, noilla kävelyteillä oli ihan tarkoituskin...
liljaadeliina (2025-08-07 04:35:27+00:00): Kiitos tiedosta
tomhukins (2025-08-08 08:58:07+00:00): Thank you for your helpful work improving the map.

If the gate at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4192178425 is permanently locked, does that mean there is no way to walk between the track to the north at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419034700 and the footpath to the south at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22956885 or is there a stile or something else nearby that hasn't been mapped yet?
Karl McC (2025-08-10 11:55:56+00:00): My mistake again, there's an unrecorded barrier on the path just below this for access to the nature reserve, I'd taken this to be that barrier. I'll revert this one and add a new barrier on the path.
tomhukins (2025-08-10 20:55:04+00:00): Thank you again for your recent helpful fixes and all your good work on the map.
Voirie_3M (2025-07-30 10:05:13+00:00): Bonjour,
nous sommes à la Voirie de la Métropole de Montpellier, il nous semble que l'avenue du pin parasol est passé en M d'après la convention de transfert. Vous avez l'info de quelle source?
Merci!
oventic (2025-07-30 13:28:57+00:00): Bonjour,
ravi d'échanger avec vous, je travaille au Pôle des Routes et Mobilités du CD34, comme vous l'avez constaté j'ai engagé une mise à jour du fond OSM concernant le champ "Ref" des voies départementales, sur la base de notre référentiel routier.

Ce référentiel routier est en opendata ici:
https://www.herault-data.fr/explore/dataset/reseau-routier-departemental-lherault/table/?disjunctive.nom_route

La D112E2 sur l'avenue du Pin Parasol est exploitée par notre Agence de St Mathieu. Il est exact que c'est cette avenue est exactement frontalière de nos 2 collectivités, à savoir la limite administrative passe à l'axe de la chaussée. 

Comment la nommer dans OSM dans ce cas ? Je suis allé consulter la doc OSM ici:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref

Il existe un champ :
"alt_ref=* – alternative reference number or codes"
Dans notre cas ce champ pourrait il être utilisé ?

Vous pouvez me contacter par mail à flegrand@herault.fr pour poursuivre cet échange
Bon après midi
Franck Legrand
Frans S (2025-08-24 10:51:22+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You deleted the names of buildings here>
However, previous mapper mapped clusters of buildings. Buildings need to be mapped individually. I invalidate this task.
SafwatHalaby (2025-10-29 15:50:10+00:00): שלום ותודה על התרומה למפה. הבניין שהוספת חופף עם בניין קיים. אם מדובר בשתי נקודות עניין בבניין בודד, יש להוסיף אותן כ-points ולא כבניינים חופפים
muralito (2025-07-29 15:49:21+00:00): Hola Emilio. Cuando el dato esta en la relacion NO hay que ponerlo en cada elemento, ej. en el Arroyo Pan de Azucar.
gurglypipe (2025-07-29 22:02:50+00:00): Why change foot=yes;discouraged to foot=no? Access by foot is possible (and discouraged), not impossible.

Did you read the discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93427676 ?
Jorisbo (2025-07-30 06:08:37+00:00): Hi gurgylypipe ! Thank you for your reaction. Mixed/multiple access tagging is rather confusing for automated routing using osm data. Since general access already is 'no' in combination of the state of the comments it seemed not likely to me to 'route' people over this road same as 'via ferrata's' are not used for routing. Also the value discouraged "should" only be used if explicitly signed that way, not because a mapper thinks it is safer. For me no problem to change it back, i did miss the discussiion you mentioned. Kind regards Joris
gurglypipe (2025-08-01 19:03:43+00:00): Heya :) Thanks for explaining things.

I think the reasoning for the consensus in 93427676 still stands, so I’ll revert this changeset (done as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169833912).

I acknowledge that multiple access tagging is confusing for routing systems, but foot=yes;discouraged is the best description of this footpath that anyone’s come up with.

I can’t remember if this footpath is physically signposted as discouraged, but other similar tidal walks on the bay are signed that way, and it’s common knowledge that people really should only attempt the walks with a local guide. But legally there’s nothing to stop them having a go themselves.

If, having read 93427676, you can suggest a better tagging scheme which encapsulates all the thoughts mentioned there, then we can surely change all the local tidal footpaths accordingly (not just this one). :)
Jorisbo (2025-08-02 05:52:51+00:00): Thank you !
gurglypipe (2025-07-29 22:04:42+00:00): Thanks for taking the time to split up the wikidata IDs
NeisBot (2025-07-29 10:54:52+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
bartgron (2025-07-29 21:46:05+00:00): Opis (tag description) został usunięty, pozdrawiam
NeisReview (2025-07-31 19:30:40+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/169694106
aceman444 (2025-07-29 13:10:51+00:00): Dakujem, za pridanie railway= tram_stop kde chybali, ale preco ich presuvate v relaciach MHD na nespravne pozicie a vytvarate nove body?

A nemyslim, ze local_ref je potrebne aj na bodoch public_transport=stop_position.
aceman444 (2025-07-29 13:13:36+00:00): Chapem, dali ste to relacie linky 3 iny bod tram_stop. To bolo dobre, dakujem. Ale preco na koniec relacie?
priean (2025-07-29 14:35:26+00:00): Ospravedlňujem sa, zabudol som upraviť poradie. Cez online editor to nie je veľmi intuitívne