piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
onterof (2026-05-08 09:22:25+00:00): Hhmm. Hab nochmal geschaut, die Zuordnung hatte ich in dem Fall auch über die (seit langen Jahren schon getaggten, vmtl. damals händisch erhobenen) refs gemacht, die zufällig auch im MaStR stehen. Laut MaStR ist die 70302 stillgelegt, aber das passt nach der Korrektur changeset/182353670 nicht mehr zur ref:mastr - Die Frage ist, ob die ref Nummern schon ursprünglich vertauscht waren, oder ob die vlt. im MaStR nicht richtig zugeordnet sind?
Am einfachsten ist das abschließend zu korrigieren, wenn der Rückbau/Stilllegung im Luftbild oder vor Ort bestätigt wurde.
Hab dazu mal eine Notiz hinterlassen
Sven50981103 (2026-06-09 17:35:59+00:00): Koordinaten und Flurstücke passen hier nicht zusammen, betrifft SEE995269349659 und SEE975836318110. Egal, wird evtl. beim Repowering geklärt.
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-15 07:24:20+00:00): Hi MacLondon,

I noticed that the name of the following relation seems a bit unintentional:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13779129

Could you please check whether something may have gone wrong?

Best regards,
Pascal
MacLondon (2026-02-15 23:48:06+00:00): Thanks Pascal. Now removed.

I tend to use that name=zz for temporary use to ensure I'm adding ways to the correct route. I try to remember to delete the name before I save the changeset, but every few days I do a search for instances where I'd forgotten to delete it.
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-16 14:44:31+00:00): Thx!
Baloo Uriza (2026-02-18 14:40:45+00:00): access=private and mapping the gate are also good ideas in such a case.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178554483
Baloo Uriza (2026-02-18 14:41:28+00:00): Also removing the street name and speed limits that obviously don't apply.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178554483
NeisBot (2026-02-14 17:54:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13564680587 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Custom deck builder"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-23 05:34:03+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178926625
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-03-04 01:04:02+00:00): Fully reverted due to intentional SEO vandalism with spammy description and explicit source of Google Maps which is of course strictly prohibited on OSM

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179328211
martinst (2026-02-14 18:39:14+00:00): Bitte aussagekräftige Kommentare im Changeset verwenden:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
eggie (2026-02-14 20:41:54+00:00): Dag fp  Even los van het feit dat we de bestaande adresnodes gebruiken zijn de meeste van je toevoegingen niet compleet.
Is deze dansschool het gehele jaar actief op deze locaties?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-14 20:46:50+00:00): aanvulling. Ik doel op de adresformat..
fpww (2026-02-15 00:37:17+00:00): Het is geen Dansschool maar dansgelegenheid die 1x per maand plaatsvindt op een zondag Eggie.
Ik wist niet dat ik bestaande nodes kon aanvullen.
Daar zal ik voortaan rekening mee houden.
Wat bedoel je met ""niet compleet?
eggie (2026-02-15 06:03:45+00:00): Hoi..
Hier ontbreekt de postcode bv.
Vaak zie je ook met die apps dat de plaatsnaam ontbreekt.
Je zou je edits nog even kunnen nalopen.
Groet,
eggie
fpww (2026-02-15 09:56:12+00:00): Hoe doe ik dat,
mijn edits nog even kunnen nalopen?
Nadat ik iets heb toegevoegd is er nog niets te zien op de map.
eggie (2026-02-15 10:10:27+00:00): Dit zijn je laatste edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/fpww/history#map=5/46.99/16.69

Niet alles wordt gerenderd in Carto (Standaardkaart) die het meest wordt gebruikt. ..dancing_school zal waarschijnlijk ook (nog) niet gerenderd worden.

Er zijn echter vele kaarten. Al die kaarten gebruiken de data van OSM en de kaartenmaker beslist wat wel of niet gerenderd wordt.
Of een dansschool op een kaart te zien is zou je moeten uitproberen volgende week of zelfs later als die andere kaartlagen hun updates hebben gehad.
Carto laat im ieder geval niets zien.
Vindbaar is her allemaal wel. 
Al die kaarten staan los van OSM. 
Kort door de bocht zou je kunnen zeggen dat OSM geen kaart is, maar een database.
Zie ook https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddancing_school
Daar staat het icon nog als proposed.

Groet,
eggie
eggie (2026-02-15 10:12:51+00:00): leisure=dance wordt wel gerenderd in Carto.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Ddance
A67-A67 (2026-02-15 20:37:04+00:00): Klopt het dat alle milonga's die nu als dansschool in Nederland zijn toegevoegd geen daadwerkelijke fysieke objecten zijn, maar evenementen die maar 1x per maand plaatsvinden?

In dat geval horen deze niet thuis in Openstreetmap. Dit is een kaart, die fysieke objecten weergeeft, geen gebeurtenissen.
eggie (2026-02-15 21:29:19+00:00): Wanneer dit alleen evenementen zijn horen ze inderdaad niet thuis in de data van osm.
NxPFoto (2026-02-14 18:26:48+00:00): *source=Mapillary
NxPFoto (2026-02-14 18:27:08+00:00): * Also beides :D
mga_geo (2026-03-19 07:56:42+00:00): Bonjour,
Je viens de voir l'ajout des arrêts de bus "Keronen". Je ne trouve pas de référence gtfs dans le fichier stops.txt.
Où avez-vous trouvez ces références ?
Normalement chaque arrêt devrait avoir une valeur différente.
Marc
GurVJ (2026-03-19 08:19:25+00:00): Bonjour, 
Je n'ai pas ajouté d'arrêts de bus, je n'ai fait que mettre à jour des tracés de chemins et routes. Les arrêts de bus dont vous parlez devaient exister avant mon intervention.
mga_geo (2026-03-19 15:01:11+00:00): C'est pourtant ce que dit la requête overpass https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2mtx
aceman444 (2026-02-16 08:55:51+00:00): Hi, please write your sources next time, thanks.
Znaika (2026-03-08 12:25:02+00:00): Hi, ist es nicht jeher ein Bürgersteig? Sollten die Radfahrer nicht Südstraße Richtung Nievenheimer Straße nehmen? VG
rempshaener (2026-03-08 12:31:29+00:00): Habe ich auch überlegt, der Vormapper hatte auch noch bicycle|foot=designated gesetzt, das passte aber nicht, mangels Beschilderung.
Auf Grund der starken baulichen Trennung (aus Süden kommend weiß man nicht einmal, dass man neben der Straße läuft/fährt) sehe ich das aber nicht mehr als straßenbegleitend. Deswegen habe ich auch am Haupt-way nichts ergänzt.
Viele Grüße
Simon Shuvo (2026-02-17 16:17:52+00:00): Shahid Minar  area is fixed to coreect shape and one way parts of road are added.
Simon Shuvo (2026-02-17 16:15:36+00:00): There is a short road divider starting from here.
rempshaener (2026-02-14 19:50:31+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Das sieht gut aus, ich habe keine Anmerkungen.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
Tatfahren (2026-02-14 21:20:33+00:00): Hast du bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528438124/history geprüft das es sich tatsächlich um eine Fußgängerzone handelt, oder hat nur der iD-Validator zu laut gemeckert?

Das gleiche bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/572175253; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/572876269 und die 2 Flächen daneben, wo vermutlich nur jemand "area:highway=footway" nicht kannte.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178556554
Tatfahren (2026-02-14 21:22:35+00:00): Und bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529911720 hast du einen Weg gelöscht, der zwar vermutlich ein hw=path hätte gewesen sein sollen, jedoch trotzdem deutlich im Bing Luftbild von 2024 sichtbar ist, und ich bezweifle das du vor Ort im Garten warst um dort zu prüfen das der Weg nicht existiert.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178556554
Kiesgenießer (2026-05-10 11:58:43+00:00): Hallo,

zur ersten Nachricht: Ich habe mir jetzt nochmal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=pedestrian durchgelesen, und habe die betroffenen ways zu area:highway=footway konvertiert. Diese Feinheit werde ich mir merken.

Zu 2. Ich finde Micromapping in privaten Gärten etwas moralisch bedenklich (Pfade, Pools, usw.) und denke nicht, dass das sich positiv auf die Community reflektiert. Gebäude/Schuppen gehen klar, aber man sollte hier die Privatsphäre respektieren, wenn man schon von oben in die privaten Gärten von anderen schaut. Im öffentlichen Raum kann man / sollte man natürlich alles bis ins kleinste Detail einpflegen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178556554
C4p5ul3 (2026-02-15 01:33:04+00:00): Can you add the website section with the following URL: https://sauverage-ouchy.ch
C4p5ul3 (2026-02-15 01:35:09+00:00): Also locale should probably be set to "fr-CH"
Piagno (2026-02-15 05:52:25+00:00): Hi capsule
On this page you are looking at the changeset, not at the Node itself. Below it has the link to the node. There you can see: I added the website as requested in your note ;) it might take some time until the change is visible in your app.
Also the "locale" you see on this page is my personal one (I use the website in german language). It has nothing todo with the node I changed.
Dino Michelini (2026-02-20 08:16:05+00:00): Ciao, la modifica di aggiungere highway=pedestrian e bridge=yes quando avevo utilizzato place=square è a mio avviso sbagliata perché manca del tag area=yes (cf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dsquare) e soprattutto non esiste il bridge=yes ma un palazzo che con un passetto ad arco sormonta via San Pellegrino . Quindi, dovresti correggere quanto classificato. Grazie
Đuro Jiří (2026-02-20 23:30:52+00:00): Ah,ho aggiunto bridge, invece area. Su Vespucci è uno sopra l'altro, quindi ho un po' sbagliato.:-)
Corretto, grazie per la segnalazione
SafwatHalaby (2026-02-25 08:13:34+00:00): שלום! אחת ההנחיות ב-OSM היא שהשם צריך להיות השם האמיתי ולא שם תיאורי.

דוגמה לשם תקין: חיפה, בית אורן, המשביר לצרכן

דוגמה לשם לא תקין: ברז מים, נביעה, עץ

תיקנתי את הנקודה הזו ע"י מחיקת השם ושינוי הסוג ל-spring
Tatfahren (2026-02-14 21:14:23+00:00): Warum hast du die Brücke bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241474816 gelöscht? Laut Bing und "saxony latest aerial Imagery" existiert sie noch.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178557438
Kiesgenießer (2026-05-10 12:40:17+00:00): Hallo Tatfahren, selbe Begründung in Bezug auf Privatsphäre siehe changeset-comment https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178556554 + ermöglicht kein gutes Routing, da die kleine private Teichbrücke komplett disjunkt von dem Wegenetz ist.

MfG
Kiesgenießer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178557438
Dimitar155 (2026-02-14 20:05:45+00:00): Здравей Ники, снимките на МЗХ са няколко години назад. Хубаво е да хвърляш по едно око и на Esri, тъй като те са от 2025 г. и показват че тук има улица.
niki88z (2026-02-15 15:21:05+00:00): Здрасти, Митак! Стана ми интересно какво се случва точно тук. Преди да премахна нещо обикновено гледам поне два източника. В случая си признавам, че не съм се поинтересувал с какви дати са двата слоя на сателитните изображения за този район. Аз ги сравних и с тези на ГИС-София, за които пише, че са 2024-та, а също така ползвах и исторически преглед на изображенията на Гугъл Земя. В случая, първо видях, че там не е планирана улица към момента. Видях, че е частен имот с ограда, която през годините се променя. На някои от по-актуалните снимки оградата е по-висока и прави сянка на парцела, която може да се възприеме и като път при размазани изображения. Виджам, че другия слой съвсем ясно показва широк път, но той е единствено и само в имота, който на останалите сателити е напълно заграден. Разбира се, нямам против да се възстанови отсечката, особено след като ти имаш по-точна информация за датата на изображенията. :)
Dimitar155 (2026-02-16 16:40:31+00:00): Готово

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178638222
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-17 00:02:15+00:00): DWG revert - doubtful names & poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184203706
NeisBot (2026-02-14 20:15:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/3932195545 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "cabinet d'ostéopathie"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : « cabinet d'ostéopathie »
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-23 05:34:03+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178926627
(Restore previous tags)
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-15 19:31:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 178596799, 178596800, 178596803, 178596812, 178596809, 178596807, 178596811, 178596817, 178596815 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import of 'micro watersheds'
eggie (2026-02-14 20:39:37+00:00): Dag Bolbuyk, Let op svp dat he de paxen niet aan de landuse vastplakt.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=178559938

Je kunt plakken voorkomen door de linker alt toets te gebruiken. 
Editor iD plakt alles aan elkaar.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-14 20:39:51+00:00): Ik heb wat losgemaakt.
Bolbuyk (2026-02-14 20:50:00+00:00): OK, dankjewel. Ik zal er op proberen te letten.
kapazao (2026-04-23 05:31:57+00:00): Revertido conjunto de cambios https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181700083

Se han eliminado zonas residenciales bien delimitadas para convertir a place=city_block como nodo, perdiéndose información del área. Simplemente se pueden convertir a place=city_block.

Añadir un área residencial global si no la había es correcto, pero no en este caso que la población ya estaba compuesta por múltiples áreas residenciales.

En este caso yo lo que haría es más simple, añade place=city_block a las zonas que corresponda, aunque ya tengan landuse=residential.

En algunos casos podría ser que alguna de esas zonas residenciales estuviera compuesta por varios place=city_block, pues añádelos como área si conoces la delimitación.

Editamos con nodo los elementos cuando se desconoce su perímetro exacto.

Un saludo
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-15 19:31:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 178596799, 178596800, 178596803, 178596812, 178596809, 178596807, 178596811, 178596817, 178596815 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import of 'micro watersheds'
RolandHUN_Mapper (2026-02-15 13:33:27+00:00): Üdv!
A kért javítás megtörtént. A hiba a Multipolygon módszer ismeretének hiányán alapul. Egy ilyen alakzat többek között csak akkor érvényes, ha a gyűrű(k) kezdő és végpontja egy koordinátára esnek, azaz zárt kört alkot. Ezen kívül fontos, hogy a kapcsolat ne tartalmazzon felesleges tagokat, ami több bezáratlan gyűrűt eredményezne, pl.: ilyen volt a bozót területéhez hozzákapcsolt fasor szegmens is, ami bezáratlan gyűrűt eredményezett. Ha többet szeretnél tudni erről a módszerről, olvasd el ezt a szócikket: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hu:Relation:multipolygon
szigyi222 (2026-02-15 14:58:49+00:00): Szia!
Nagyon szépen köszönöm, így már teljesen világos!
RolandHUN_Mapper (2026-02-15 17:41:16+00:00): Örülök, hogy sikerült tisztázni a szerkesztési hibákat. Ha továbbiakban is kérdéseid lennének, írj erre a módosításkészletre üzenetet, vagy a módisításkészletedre egy fixme jelzést, és mihamarabb ránézek az ügyre. További jó térképezést! :)
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-15 19:31:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 178596799, 178596800, 178596803, 178596812, 178596809, 178596807, 178596811, 178596817, 178596815 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import of 'micro watersheds'
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-15 19:31:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 178596799, 178596800, 178596803, 178596812, 178596809, 178596807, 178596811, 178596817, 178596815 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import of 'micro watersheds'
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-15 19:31:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 178596799, 178596800, 178596803, 178596812, 178596809, 178596807, 178596811, 178596817, 178596815 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import of 'micro watersheds'
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-15 19:31:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 178596799, 178596800, 178596803, 178596812, 178596809, 178596807, 178596811, 178596817, 178596815 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import of 'micro watersheds'
woodpeck (2026-02-15 19:34:11+00:00): Dear Devanshi_Malik, if you need to make experiments, make them on one of the dev servers and not on OpenStreetMap proper. If you want to import data to OpenStreetMap proper, prior discussion is required (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines). I doubt that the highly detailed "microwatershets" in this import would pass muster with the OSM community; at the very least, the "area_in_ha" tag, the source on each object, the "ref", and the high precision would need to go.
Enock4seth (2026-03-02 16:38:47+00:00): Hi NACHINDI _ ABDUL _RAUF, kindly use Esri World Imagery as background for adding new features around here. This is how to change in iD editor https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/imagery/#changing-the-background-aerial-imagery
Rainero (2026-03-15 17:42:48+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179910396
(unzulässige Quelle)
eggie (2026-02-14 22:09:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
AwFi (2026-02-15 13:51:40+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che hai cambiato i tag di network in IFN, ma non riesco a capirne il significato, mi riferisco anche a tanti altri changeset. Intendi forse Impresa Ferroviaria Nazionale? 
Buon mapping!
AwFi
Thebro7her (2026-02-16 15:13:14+00:00): Ciao, si li sto modificando e significa Infrastruttura Ferroviaria Nazionale. Li sto modificando in base a ciò che sta riportato sul sito ufficiale RFI.
Grazie e buon mapping pure a te.
AwFi (2026-02-16 15:23:14+00:00): Ciao,
grazie per la risposta. Io avrei qualche dubbio ad utilizzare il campo network per "Infrastruttura Ferroviaria Nazionale". Il campo network=* identifica l'area tariffaria, o comunque l'ente che gestisce il servizio (non l'infrastruttura). In questo caso penso sia un campo da lasciare libero, senza valori, visto che in stazione ci può fare servizio chiunque nelle limitazioni delle tracce a mercato, oltre al servizio sussidiato dalla regione.
Thebro7her (2026-02-17 15:26:25+00:00): Ciao, il network pensavo si riferisse all'infrastruttura e non al servizio perchè non avevo visto la wiki e stavo prendendo come riferimento il sito di RFI. Provvedo a modificare di nuovo le stazioni in cui ho effettuato le modifiche del network.
Grazie.
eggie (2026-02-14 22:18:02+00:00): Dag Dutch  De naam van het gebouw is niet Oude rehoboth locatie (Gesloten)
Ik heb name= even omgezet naar description. Svp geen name= gebruiken om iets te beschrijven of verduidelijken.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-14 22:16:20+00:00): Dag Jack  De naam van het tuincentrum verwijderd van de gebouwomtrek.

We gebruiken alleen de adresnodes. 
MVG
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-16 09:19:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 178618661 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional golf course
trial (2026-02-15 18:58:01+00:00): Des tracés approximatifs ne tenant pas compte de tracés existants. De plus un talus n'est pas une ligne d'arbres d'alignement. barrier=hedge, hedge=hedge_bank représente mieux un talus.
eggie (2026-02-14 22:20:23+00:00): Kijk even hier.   Je kunt niet zomaar zelf tags verzinnen. Dat werkt allemaal  niet.
pinnen???  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:*

MVG
eggie
felipeeugenio (2026-02-15 13:07:52+00:00): Reversado.
Taya_S (2026-02-18 07:15:32+00:00): Hello abtal1,

When I translate this object, it says that this is a residential street, but it is mapped as a place=quarter? How does that work?
Taya_S (2026-02-27 14:12:09+00:00): Reverted some low quality edits by sockpuppet account

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179133451
MassCartog (2026-02-15 00:55:32+00:00): Hi skoocooms, you have removed features that appear on the ground, you are right they don't seem 100% aligned with the road on the ground, but its clear they mostly follow visible tracks. Could you respond and explain why you are removing these rather than updating them and tagging them correctly as private is that's the case?
skoocoom (2026-02-17 02:59:36+00:00): These random tracks from the TIGER import are very low value and I think it is cleaner to just remove them.  These are usually wildly inaccurate, and are on private land where they are essentially of no use to anyone.  In the rare cases where someone might want these (say because a rancher allows hunting on their land) it would be easier to add them from scratch.

The TIGER import was almost 20 years ago, I don't think that we need to leave these weird messy roads around forever.
MassCartog (2026-03-02 17:00:06+00:00): Hi skoocoom, I understand the desire to clean up messy TIGER data, but simply deleting roads that correspond to visible tracks on the ground is not standard OSM practice. If a track exists, it should be re-aligned to the imagery and tagged appropriately (e.g., access=private) rather than deleted. Deleting verifiable data is counterproductive for emergency services and future mappers. 

Please try to improve the geometry or tagging instead of removing the data entirely! Thanks. If you think this is incorrect, feel free to start a discussion on the OpenStreetMap Community Forum and tag me!
VillagePoPtart (2026-02-14 22:18:10+00:00): First attempt at adding an ALPR camera.
IsStatenIsland (2026-02-16 01:46:10+00:00): To any third parties: I contacted with this person to get some clarity. The bulletin describes changes that won't be complete for another month so there was a misunderstanding.

Trying to fix some of the mistakes on Sunday and Monday.
Comino (2026-02-16 08:02:09+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Maps
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
ChrissW-R1 (2026-02-23 10:13:57+00:00): Hi https://osm.org/user/Comino,

thanks for the information. I try to remember to use the currency-Tag in the future.
Is there a reason, why you only removed the wrong tag and didn't change it to the right one?

Greetings
Chriss
Comino (2026-02-23 12:03:06+00:00): I could not verify the acceptance of Bitcoin from their website.
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-16 09:19:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 178618661 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional golf course