piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Dodko (2023-12-30 10:23:10+00:00): Adresa sa nachádza v budove https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59002369 nie je potrebné ju duplicitne pridávať do POI bodu.
Na otvárací čas musí byť presne Sa pomôcka na tvorbu je https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
Na dátumy https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date používajte formát yyyy-mm-dd
eggie (2023-12-28 20:21:48+00:00): Dag A3  amenity=restaurant heb ik verwijderd. Niet dubbel taggen svp en alleen de adresnodes gebruiken.
MVG
eggie
A3vk (2023-12-28 20:25:08+00:00): Hoi eggie,
Excuus, nu snap ik hoe het werkt. Bedankt voor de uitleg!
groet,
Adri
eggie (2023-12-28 20:28:35+00:00): Laat je niet weer houden door kritiek Het gaat best goed.
Mapse eggie
eggie (2023-12-28 20:22:41+00:00): amenity restaurant heb ik verwijderd.
Dat staat op de adresnode.
MVG
eggie
literan (2023-12-30 11:42:55+00:00): не пойму, магазин называется "ООО "Технотрейд групп""?

так и говорят - "иду в магазин ООО "Технотрейд групп""?

может, это офис, а не магазин?
literan (2023-12-30 11:43:39+00:00): мы же не пишем название магазина телефонов name=ПАО "Билайн"
solenoid jam (2023-12-30 12:07:34+00:00): Не знаю. Я только регистр букв названия перевел в нижний. Сёрфил в органике, увидел, исправил.
NeisBot (2023-12-28 21:18:46+00:00): Hello, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!
#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-28 23:50:03+00:00): Hi. Sorry, but are you quite certain about what you're mapping here? Some of the areas you've mapped as putting greens appear very rough in imagery? Thanks
NieWnen (2023-12-29 15:04:24+00:00): Czy na tym odcinku pojawiło się/istnieje oznakowanie odnośnie nisko przelatujących samolotów/zagrożenia od startujących samolotów?

Wg wiki ten tag powinien być stosowany właśnie w takich przypadkach:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Ahazard%3Dlow_flying_aircraft

Pas 11 nie wygląda dla mnie na taki przypadek. Odległość jest dość spora.

Przykład użycia wg wiki może być np. na St Marteen https://youtu.be/GqVjD3nBSQg?t=70
Thelone1986 (2023-12-29 14:58:35+00:00): Hey (again),

Thanks for adding the master routes (always forget this is a thing in OSM) and for some little corrections here and there on the bus lines I've added recently, but I'm pretty sure this was mapped correctly before though. Both ways do the little loop in Jemeppe's center and thus use both ways as well here
wwwouaiebe (2023-12-30 08:39:27+00:00): Je pense que ID essaie de trie les chemins des relations bus lorsqu'il sauvegarde les données. Et pour les relations où le bus fait une boucle, il est impossible de faire un tri correct de façon automatique...
Je vois d'ailleurs qu'il reste encore une erreur dans un des proxibus 111 qui prend un sens unique juste avant la gare de bus de Jemeppe. Je vais faire la correction (mais pourquoi a t'on dessiné deux routes là, alors qu'il n'y en a qu'une en pratique? c'est une vieille modification...).
eggie (2023-12-28 21:09:11+00:00): Dag juseit... Wanneer het pad opgenomen is in het landschap en niet meer bestaat kun je het verwijderen, maar als er nog wel iets als een pad is dan beter laten staan en dan toevoegen smootheness=impassable of very_bad
Paden die verdwijnen worden ook getagd met disused:highway=path  Dat voorkomt opnieuw intekenen door medemappers.
MVG
eggie

MVg
eggie
eggie (2023-12-28 21:42:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
gscholz (2024-03-07 06:58:16+00:00): Hi Alvig17,
your recent edits have left behind several broken landuse relations with wrong item roles:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-0.76152&lat=45.83324&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=intersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145637456

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Orblivion (2024-09-28 00:53:17+00:00): My understanding is that Body Freedom, Silk Road, and I'm guessing Night Owls, Quiet RV, and Quiet/Family as well, are part of Porcfest, and not Rogers' permanent setup. I know you didn't all all of these but you added at least some of them.

I think temporary features like this are generally frowned upon, because they don't exist outside of the time frame. Even if you delete it after the event, there's a lag before which apps like Organic Maps gets the data.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features

That said, there seem to be proposals for temporary features, which would be awesome here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Temporary_(conditional)

BTW it's awesome that you guys added the individual campsites. It crossed my mind to do that at some point as well. Looks like there's movement on making them show up on Organic Maps.
Anonix35 (2023-12-30 10:44:43+00:00): Are you sure ? 
Because the ski slope is always on the ski-map
Zeyphros (2023-12-31 13:12:21+00:00): Fairly sure. I skiied the charly piste and couldn't find the intersection. The connection too the saslong isn't visible on the official mydolomiti app either.
Frans S (2023-12-29 09:54:10+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A request.
You mapped buildings which cross the residential area border. This gives errors which need to be corrected.
Just move the residential area a bit next to the buildings so that all buildings are within the residential area. I correct it.
Best regards
jmarchon (2023-12-29 06:07:29+00:00): Hello,
Welcome to OSM! Please note that deleting trails paths and roads just because they are private is strongly discouraged. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F for more details. I have reverted this changeset.
Thanks,
jmarchon
nickswalker (2023-12-28 22:04:23+00:00): Unfortunately OSM only allows binary feedback. To clarify the review: the highway=service tag is the correct designation for a private alley. The names are a bit confusing (highway is used for almost all vehicle roads). Please take a look at the documentation to help make sense of the tags:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway

If you've spotted an error but aren't sure how to fix it, consider leaving a note instead: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes

This can signal experienced mappers to help.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145638013
Stella92 (2023-12-28 22:14:53+00:00): Okay, makes sense. I added the Highway tag and made the road residential vs service based on the definitions you linked to. THanks!
eggie (2023-12-28 21:45:32+00:00): Commentaar moet zijn.. adresnode teruggeplaatst.
Tomas Straupis (2023-12-29 05:45:20+00:00): Ne, ne tavo rajonas. Atšaukiau pakeitimą.
RGBCMYK (2023-12-29 06:23:48+00:00): O gal tavo? Gerai kad kitus pakeitimus priėmei. Ten prie fucking san diego aikštelė ale stovėjimo 🅿 nu ir gut.
SomeoneElse (2024-01-03 00:24:26+00:00): Hello Tomas,
Can you explain why you said "no, not your area" here?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2024-01-03 00:24:49+00:00): Sveikas Tomai,
Ar galite paaiškinti, kodėl čia pasakėte „ne, ne tavo sritis“?
Geriausi linkėjimai,
Andy Townsendas, OSM duomenų darbo grupės vardu.
Tomas Straupis (2024-01-03 06:34:32+00:00): Because some of the data entered is not correct (I live there and know exactly what is where). To get the idea about this user - also check comments of this user on different blog posts on 2023-12-29:
1 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Tomas%20Straupis/diary/390216#comment56325, 2 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Tomas%20Straupis/diary/402727#comment56327)
SomeoneElse (2024-01-13 13:13:23+00:00): The other correspondent also claims to be familiar with the local area...
VLD549 (2024-03-26 10:20:08+00:00): Hi, it looks like the blue line you've indicated is Deltazijde, parallel to Laantje van Oversteegen.
Could you please check?
Thank you.
A67-A67 (2024-03-26 16:08:25+00:00): Hi, The cyclepath (blue line) is called Laantje van Oversteegen in both the BAG and BGT (government databases).
VLD549 (2024-04-04 09:19:51+00:00): Thank you.
yawfle (2023-12-29 03:41:38+00:00): Hey again! Glad to see you're sticking with it! I just wanted to mention a nuance about building outlines that I wish I had realized when I was starting out. As tempting as it might be to adjust the alignment to better match the current imagery, it's actually much better to observe the general (mis)alignment of the surroundings, and maintain that in the shapes you add/modify... in other words, keep aligned to what's already mapped. This becomes more of an issue in densely packed situations where failing to do so can result in overlap.

One nice thing about the existing building shapes for L.A. county is that they were imported en masse, hence have good alignment to each other, as opposed to being drawn over time to different versions of satellite imagery. You'll notice that the imagery alignment can change not only over time, but in different areas at any given time. If you try some of the other (non-Bing) image sources available in the editor, you'll get an appreciation of how much the accuracy has improved lately. Cheers!
HeyRayReh (2023-12-30 02:32:30+00:00): Hey thank you again for the tip!  I'll realign the buildings I added and edited to match the surroundings.  I kinda figured since they were added en masse they'd all have to be "fixed" at some point to match the satellite imagery and I was doing something helpful, but what you're saying makes perfect sense!  

To that point - when I'm using GPX data from a hike/bike/etc that I did, I have been trusting the satellite imagery over my GPS when they don't exactly line up - is it better practice to go 100% with the GPS?  Or to lean more toward the GPS?  Is there a preferred non-default image source?
yawfle (2023-12-30 03:25:51+00:00): It's been a while since I've used traces as sources, so I haven't been observing how well they fit recent imagery (but I'm sure it's much better than it used to be). Personally, I would say that if you observe a consistent overall offset for a given trace, it would make sense to retain it, or at least split the difference, with the understanding that future imagery might very well fall in line. Of course, in areas already densely populated with features, you should generally align with those, as already discussed.

Hopefully the imagery alignment will continue to improve, but for now it's a good idea to keep an eye on its overall fit to the part of the map you're working on, and account for that. This is doubly true when using some of the other available backgrounds, but they can still be useful for seeing a differently lit view of a shaded area, etc... just take the geo accuracy with an extra grain of salt. I'm not aware of anything better than the default Bing imagery being readily available, but if you find something, let me know!

(BTW, last I checked, the custom background feature in ID wasn't retained across logins, so if you set something up, keep the info somewhere handy so you can paste it in again if you need to.)
comfyquiettree (2023-12-28 21:58:48+00:00): Na wiki je doporučen, ale pouze u tohoto typu, což nedává moc smysl. Tagovat jako building je navíc celkově moc nehodí
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-28 21:58:24+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 145617263, 145617485, 145617552, 145617623, 145618161, 145618624, 145618846, 145618931, 145619113, 145619197, 145619665, 145620280, 145621422, 145621449, 145621583.
Minh Nguyen (2023-12-29 05:30:05+00:00): Thanks!
Marek-M (2023-12-28 22:07:35+00:00): Informacja o otwarciu drogi: https://drmg.gdansk.pl/index.php/d-realizowane/3560-przetarg-na-rozbudowe-ul-budowlanych

Aktualizacja, 28.12.2023 r.

W piątek, 29 grudnia pomiędzy godz. 9.30 a 10.00 ulica Budowlanych zostanie udostępniona dla ruchu w obu kierunkach. Ponadto z nowej infrastruktury będą mogli korzystać piesi i rowerzyści.
DUGA (2024-06-19 02:20:25+00:00): This changeset is basically junk. Town road is not numbered by PennDOT.

Your name suggests that you live in MD or associate with MD, I recommend staying in MD of all your changesets unless you are clear of what you are doing here.
Glassman (2023-12-30 03:05:43+00:00): I changed the alley back to a service road. Alleys are service roads in OSM. We use Englands road classifications since OSM was started in England. (As well as British English spellings. For example what we call a curb is a kerb in British English). See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway for more information on tagging highways.


I also removed the private access tags. These may be privately maintained, but anyone can use the road unless it is marked. From street level imagery it doesn't appear to be marked as a private road. 

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access for more information on use of the access key.

I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. 

Please reach out if you think I'm wrong.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145639079
Stella92 (2024-01-02 23:20:03+00:00): I agree that there are no visual street signage that shows this is a private street but I live in this community of Briarcliff and it's a private street with an HOA. This can be confirmed with the City of Seattle. If you look at the City of Seattle road map, this alley does not have a neighborhood road designation.
blackboxlogic (2023-12-30 17:40:23+00:00): From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout
"Do not directly connect approaching with departing roads"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145639097
blackboxlogic (2023-12-30 18:36:27+00:00): You put a building on top of a building (way 717629158)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145639097
blackboxlogic (2023-12-30 18:43:39+00:00): Way 1235038995 is also a duplicate. Please respond if you need help fixing these.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145639097
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-28 23:22:09+00:00): Здравствуйте, Лиеннияааа, добро пожаловать в OSM. Пожалуйста, упомяните одну вещь. Когда вы закончите отображение здания, нажмите кнопку "Q", чтобы загладить углы, а не оставлять их в виде странной формы. Спасибо!
_____________________
Hello Lienniaaaa, welcome to OSM. Please mention one thing. When you are done mapping the building, press the "Q" button to smooth out the corners instead of leaving them as a weird shape. Thank you!!!
tastrax (2023-12-29 10:39:11+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-12-30 22:36:48+00:00): Hi Janni K,

vielen Dank für Deine Mithilfe! :-)

Wie ist denn der Name von diesem Werk? Kennst Du den auch?

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
Janni K (2023-12-30 22:39:34+00:00): Turtle24 GmbH. Ich war mir unsicher, wie Namen von Gebäuden und Namen von Firmen zu unterscheiden sind, vor allem wenn die Firma das gesamte Gebäude benutzt.
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-12-30 22:45:36+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Antwort!

Wenn die Firma das ganze Gebäude einnimmt, dann kannst Du (wie Du es hier gemacht hast) die POI-Daten an die Linie vom Gebäude schreiben/"taggen".

Also einfach den Tag "name=Turtle24" an die Gebäudelinie hinzufügen. Die Rechtsform lassen wir bei OSM bei Namen grundsätzlich weg.

Ansonsten ist es sinnvoll Gebäudedaten und POI-Daten zu trennen und dafür jeweils eigene Datenobjekte zu erstellen. Z.B als zusätzlichen Punkt innerhalb des Gebäudeumrisses.

Wie Du magst. :-)
MxxCon (2024-01-02 01:04:23+00:00): Hello.
Did this new business keep the old place's phone number?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145639892
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-29 02:56:38+00:00): Hello & welcome to OSM. Thanks for updating things, but we always prefer keeping the history of features intact, so we would ask you to just update and, if necessary, move the old features, not delete them, then map them again. Thanks!
Adela Švončinárová (2023-12-29 22:10:09+00:00): co este tu ribudlo okrem tej krizovatky?
aceman444 (2023-12-31 14:15:05+00:00): Za Vendoparkom chodnik pozdlz Esterhazyovcov pokracuje k novopostavenym bytovkam a tak som ho pridal a nove cesty k nim a dalsie nove cesty a domy na zapad od Esterhazyovcov.
woodpeck (2024-02-11 20:26:55+00:00): I have reverted this changeset because OSM has its own rules about what can and cannot be mapped, and military airfields can definitely be mapped. Deleting them from OSM is vandalism - DWG Ticket#2024021110000171
Jrachi (2023-12-31 08:57:43+00:00): Sono d'accordo che non sia un'area residenziale.
Ma invece di cancellare non potevi mettere il tag corretto.
Sono sicuro che data la profondità dei tuoi change conosci molto bene il posto.
Fedurli (2023-12-31 15:00:04+00:00): Ciao, sì ma qual è quello corretto dove ci sono malghe e un convento abbandonato?
Jrachi (2023-12-31 16:54:04+00:00): Il luogo ha una sacralità per tutta la zona.
Mi sa che non ci sei mai stato.
E cancellare è sempre una cosa brutta, sopratutto se non sai gestire il cambiamento.
Fedurli (2023-12-31 21:42:02+00:00): Non ho capito la finalità di questo commento, dato che non propone una soluzione, non suggerisce il landuse corretto che non è di sicuro area residenziale e infine afferma che "cancellare è una brutta cosa" suggerendo così di mantenere errori evidenti sulla mappa. Critiche costruttive sempre ben accette, ma qui di costruttivo c'è nulla, solo volontà di far polemica.
Jrachi (2024-01-01 08:04:27+00:00): Rendo la mia domanda più esplicita:
Cosa sai del luogo?
Ci sei mai stato?
Ti puoi considerare un abitante o conoscitore della zona?
Se conoscessi la lingua italiana, capiresti che "sacrale" si traduce con "landuse=religious"
Se per te cancellare è meglio di migliorare, e se chiederti spiegazioni delle modifiche che fai a raffica sono polemica, dovresti pensare a perché sei stato già bloccato una volta.
Ivo
Fedurli (2024-01-02 00:02:07+00:00): Vedi, non conoscevo il tag, ma adesso l'ho inserito. Bastava commentare inizialmente "Effettivamente c'era un landuse errato, ma perché anziché eliminarlo non hai inserito =religiuous?" Un po' di gentilezza rende il mondo migliore ;)
Jrachi (2024-01-02 08:38:56+00:00): Gentilezza si usa per contributori che sono alle prime armi e rispondono alle osservazioni dei senior.
Per quelli come te che sembra si divertano a usare le regole a proprio piacimento preferisco non usare mezzi termini.
La mia prima risposta è stata di dirti cos'è quel luogo. Ed ora "scopri" il tag appropriato.
Significa che tu mappi da remoto cose che da remoto non andrebbero toccate.
wvfibraóptic (2024-01-15 14:01:15+00:00): w
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-06 17:45:42+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11464335587/history has shop = flour_mill that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=flour_mill ? Is it man_made=works by any chance (milling flour)? Or is it shop=flour (selling flour)? Or it place where you can walk in bringing grain and mill own flour? Maybe both objects are present at this location?
suhailvs (2025-01-07 03:43:42+00:00): Hi,
This is a place where you can bring grain and mill flour. Also the flour can dry here.
Frans S (2023-12-31 11:46:57+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
However, not all buildings were squared
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145640818
mcliquid (2023-12-29 15:22:43+00:00): Hola, ya he comentado que sus conjuntos de cambios son demasiado grandes. Concentra tus cambios localmente.

Hello, I have already commented that your changesets are much too big. Concentrate your changes locally.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-28 23:54:07+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 145617538, 145617728, 145617800, 145617898.
felipeeugenio (2023-12-29 11:18:13+00:00): Hola
Ese living street que cruza varias casas puede ser una vía que se use, pero pasa claramente por propiedad privada.
Por otra parte, por favor ser más especifico con los shops. Ante la duda usar =yes, pero en varios casos hay valores bastante accesibles.
saludos y gracias
nevw (2023-12-29 05:19:03+00:00): Hi
Murray Jackson Drive does not appear on the map here.
Is this a mistake?
GPO MTN Sports (2023-12-29 21:40:09+00:00): Hi there and thanks for picking this up. Definitely a mistake. The road name changed a few years ago and my brain is stuck in the past! I will fix this up. Thanks
Baloo Uriza (2024-01-07 19:42:23+00:00): Not bad, but there shouldn't be abbreviations in name tags.  For example, Capri Lane
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145642123
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-29 01:22:50+00:00): Hello & welcome to OSM. Thanks for updating things, but we always prefer keeping the history of items intact, so we would ask you to just update and, if necessary, move the old features, not delete them then map them again. Thanks!
mcliquid (2023-12-29 15:22:35+00:00): Hola, ya he comentado que sus conjuntos de cambios son demasiado grandes. Concentra tus cambios localmente.

Hello, I have already commented that your changesets are much too big. Concentrate your changes locally.
Aleks-Berlin (2023-12-31 09:31:17+00:00): Hi harimawood,
please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:wikimedia_commons#Examples
Thanks, Alex
arjunaraoc (2023-12-30 02:11:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my update vide https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145682505
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145643204
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-29 02:20:50+00:00): Hello again. Looking further at your changes & you are still deleting then remappign features. You are also frequently overlapping fairways & greens. Please improve the quality of what you're doing or we may be forced to take further action. Graeme Fitzpatrick, 
Moderator, OSMF Data Working Group
cnorton0212 (2023-12-29 03:16:18+00:00): Thank you for letting me know, I will make sure not to overlap the fairways and green and will not delete anything going forward.
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-06-11 04:15:16+00:00): Thank you for contribution.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145643660