piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
santamariense (2026-07-27 19:03:56+00:00): Olá alaaan021,

Bem-vindo ao OSM. Notei que tu rebaixou a via principal para residencial.

Não acha que faz sentido manter como tertiary? Olhando a malha viária, nota-se que essas vias servem como coletoras do bairro.

Não menos importante, evite deletar tags sem saber exatamente para o que servem. Muitas eu concordo que tu tenha deletado, pois são consideradas obsoletas, contudo tu acabou deletando tags que não deveria, como postal_code=* (CEP da rua) e sidewalk=* (que define se a rua tem calçadas).

Legal você ter adicionado lanes=*.

Bons mapeamentos,
alaaan021 (2026-07-27 19:10:55+00:00): Olá! Tudo certo?

Em relação às tags deletadas, foram tags q eu mesmo tinha adicionado mas pesquisando vi que o correto era deixar código postal e etc apenas para endereços de residência e afins.
Sobre o rebaixamento da via, essas vias são dão acesso a residências do bairro, não ligam nenhum ponto importante da cidade, apenas moradores ultizam. Esse foi o critério para o rebaixamento.

Valeu!
tg4567 (2026-04-06 14:49:11+00:00): does it make sense to add a separate shelter node?  Usually these are handled inside the bus stop node with shelter=yes
LingM (2026-04-07 19:43:04+00:00): I don't know tbh. shelter=yes is set here. My main concern is consistency. The stop in the other direction had the shelter mapped, so I added this one.

At least within Aachen it's inconsistent over all. Many have their shelters mapped while many others don't. Some shelters have building=yes, others have no building=* tag.

Are you aware of any previous discussion for Aachen or the wider Germany?
LingM (2026-04-07 19:46:14+00:00): (iD automatically sets building=yes if you select Transit Shelter in the UI, so that explains why some are tagged that way.)
aixbrick (2026-04-08 07:01:06+00:00): @tg4567: "shelter=yes" means that a shelter exists. It may be mapped separatly, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter.
LingM (2026-04-08 16:28:34+00:00): One problem with the renderer is that it apparently treats the shelters are more important than the bus stops themselves. E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2933651731 only gets rendered in the highest zoom level (10 m scale), while the shelter as well as stops without a mapped shelter start being shown at the 100 m zoom level.
aixbrick (2026-04-08 16:47:27+00:00): Known issue: https://github.com/openstreetmap-carto/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2431
NeisBot (2026-04-02 20:42:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/907614623 v2 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/907614624 v1 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/8427747556 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180786591
iandees (2026-04-02 21:26:02+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8427747556 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180787975, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
eggie (2026-04-03 12:29:00+00:00): reverted by changeset #180809074
Yunkers (2026-04-03 13:33:40+00:00): A skądże wziąłeś tę nazwę?
OlasMapy (2026-04-03 20:03:30+00:00): Transliteracja i użycie języka polskiego. Przez polskich turystów w Retymnie jest ta nazwa używana. Sam tam byłem.
Yunkers (2026-04-04 08:15:19+00:00): Też tam byłem i nikt tak nie mówi. Tak więc usuwam to.
OlasMapy (2026-04-06 13:59:35+00:00): Dodałem jako nazwę alternatywną, nie jako główną, więc się zastanów.
Yunkers (2026-04-07 08:15:54+00:00): Zastanowiłem się. Nie zmieniłem zdania.
muralito (2026-04-06 15:15:15+00:00): Mirko, en OSM se mapea la realidad. Actualmente las Malvinas y el resto de esas islas no están bajo soberanía argentina. Tendrias que esperar que ese estatus cambie, cosa que veo dificil en corto o medio plazo ya que hoy por hoy Argentina tiene a un fan de Thatcher como presidente.
Bondi Maps (2026-04-07 23:05:58+00:00): Nunca se hizo nada por las Malvinas y este presidente es el único qye busca negociar. Dejá C5N pa.
muralito (2026-04-07 23:21:33+00:00): Mirá vos, no sabía que la BBC era zurda https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce43zv3qln9o

Sacate la venda fiera.
caistk (2026-04-07 16:32:24+00:00): czemu usunieto residential area?
uprkos (2026-04-07 17:39:10+00:00): Tam były wyrysowane residential na każdą kamienicę osobno, posklejane ze wszystkim i z jakimś absurdalnym tagiem barier=fence. Planuję dokończyć poprawki całego kwartału i wyrysować landuse obejmujący cały kwartał zabudowy mieszkalnej.
eggie (2026-04-03 12:29:59+00:00): reverted by changeset #180809119
eggie (2026-04-02 20:58:52+00:00): Beste ... De name staan al op de waterway. Die horen niet nogmaals op het watervlak.
Niet alles is fout in OSM.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-02 21:00:44+00:00): Bing is outdated.. Please use PDOK actueel.
The names are already on the waterway.
eggie (2026-04-03 12:31:40+00:00): reverted by changeset #180809196
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-04 12:18:16+00:00): Reverted series of changesets adding SEO POI and blatantly promotional description=* and other malformed tags to it

https://osm.org/changeset/185088070
JJIglesias (2026-04-03 08:40:36+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales
NeisBot (2026-04-02 21:12:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13574658727 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Florist shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-02 22:33:26+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-04 10:52:52+00:00): Reverted series of changesets adding SEO POI and blatantly promotional description=* and other malformed tags to it

https://osm.org/changeset/185084842
schobbish (2026-04-02 22:59:28+00:00): Hey DrivingDuck and welcome to OSM! Looks like you accidentally modified the relation for the city of Keller; I have undone this for you in changeset 180789642. This is an easy mistake to make, so don't worry about it. Thank you for improving ALPR data!
DrivingDuck (2026-04-03 01:10:13+00:00): Thanks, schobbish! The interface is, well, complex. My apologies, and thanks.

Not sure exactly what I messed up, but I do know I moved the Flock camera on the NW corner of Smithfield and North Tarrant Parkway to the SW corner, which would change it to North Richland Hills…and I don’t think I changed anything there (either?)?
schobbish (2026-04-03 02:24:43+00:00): I'm not sure how it happens either (I usually use a different editor), but somehow some of the camera tags ended up on the boundary for Keller, which is right on that road. That camera is missing some tags now if you want to fix that. But you didn't change anything with NRH's boundary.
DrivingDuck (2026-04-03 02:31:46+00:00): I’ll take a deep breath and see if I can learn before I fiddle some more, I think.
DFW-Backyard7 (2026-04-03 07:18:45+00:00): A [Relation:boundary] is a group of one or more ways (think like how a road is drawn, but not a road) that defines the physical city limits of one or more cities. So somehow what you ended up doing was setting Keller's entire city limit line as an ALPR lol. Not sure how it happened either, but I think you can prevent it from happening by hiding city boundaries in the editor and that should prevent them from even being interactable with at all. Click on the map data icon on the right of the editor and uncheck Boundaries. If it was already off then I'm really not sure what happened lol, but don't worry too much unless it happens again.

If you find the online editor to be confusing, you could also check out JOSM. It has a lot more features and an even more complex interface, so it's definitely not for everyone, but counterintuitively I found that I have an easier time understanding what I'm doing when I use it. 

You might already be aware of it, but the Deflock app is also an option for editing. It provides an interface for editing ALPR-related features only, and is pretty foolproof and hard to mess up other things with. If you also want to edit non-ALPR related stuff on the go, I recommend the app EveryDoor, it's especially good for things like adding shop details or park features.

As someone from NRH, thanks so much for joining and helping us keep track of the surveillance! If you're like me you'll end up addicted and start adding park benches and sidewalks too :)
eggie (2026-04-02 21:24:41+00:00): reverted by changeset #180787905

Please don't add  names at the waterbody.
Gr eggie
eggie (2026-04-02 21:27:11+00:00): reverted by changeset #180788006
Taya_S (2026-04-03 14:23:11+00:00): Hello Matryx03,

Could you explain how you surveyed this data and what exactly "Asfalt_Premium" is?

Best regards,  
Taya Snijder,
Yog Sot (2026-04-03 23:39:23+00:00): I can confirm this asphalt is real bad, but yeah, description of this and other changesets is not that great, but changes are okey in general, tho i didn't look every single one ;]
NeisBot (2026-04-02 21:27:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13699458656 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "HVAC contractor office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-10 22:33:13+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181170199
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Wildsharky (2026-04-03 12:16:51+00:00): Revert of 180786591
Wildsharky (2026-04-03 12:16:16+00:00): Revert of 180787820
NeisBot (2026-04-02 21:30:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13699840621 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Furniture store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-10 22:33:16+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181170200
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 10:41:25+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset 184906777

https://osm.org/changeset/184906777
eggie (2026-04-02 21:43:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Selecteer eerst de adresnode en tag dan daarop bij. Ik heb de info samengevoegd.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-04-02 21:42:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13634832252 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Waterproofing company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-03 04:33:17+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-04 10:52:20+00:00): Reverted series of changesets adding SEO POI and blatantly promotional description=* and other malformed tags to it

https://osm.org/changeset/185084820
LordGarySugar (2026-04-02 22:04:17+00:00): Hi, I saw your post on the forums and came to check out the missing buildings in Northampton. It's great to see you making a start on filling in the gaps, but there's a couple of things you need to do quality-wise.
The first is making sure that terraced and semidetached houses are connected to their neighbouring buildings, there shouldn't be gaps between them.
The second thing is squaring the buildings you've mapped with 'Q', this will make them more accurate and will look better. You can also select a row of connected houses and square them all together.
Any questions feel free to ask, thanks!
LordGarySugar (2026-04-02 22:08:50+00:00): I've just seen in your other comment that you're mapping on mobile - it would be best to find a dedicated mobile editor such as Vespucci. iD is not designed for touchscreen use, so I don't know if it would be possible to follow the advice I've given above.
MichelleMapsss (2026-04-03 10:36:16+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for taking the time to check my edits and for the advice, I really appreciate it!

I’m currently mapping on mobile, so I’m not sure how to connect terraced houses properly like you mentioned. I didn’t realise iD wasn’t really designed for touchscreen use, so that might explain why I’ve been struggling a bit.

I’ll look into using Vespucci, but if you could help out with any of my edits or give guidance on how to improve them, I’d really appreciate it.

Thanks again for your help!
c674a (2026-05-20 19:30:20+00:00): è corretto mappare città della scienza come theme park? non essendo un parco divertimenti, a me non parrebbe corretto
NeisBot (2026-04-02 22:00:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13701639706 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Employment agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-10 22:33:21+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181170202
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
ftrebien (2026-06-16 14:01:31+00:00): Sempre que promover uma estrada de terra a uma classificação mais alta, é importante também informar a superfície dela (surface=unpaved ou surface=dirt) para que os usuários e os sistemas de navegação não a tratem como pavimentada. Muitas pessoas preferem evitar longas estradas de terra quando há alternativas, mesmo que sejam mais longas.
eggie (2026-04-03 06:30:40+00:00): Dag Kian,

Alle gebouwen in OSM zijn afkomstig van directe ingemeten import vanuit de BAG (Kadaster).
Je kunt niet gebouwen uitlijnen op grond van een schuin genomen luchtfoto.
Dus niet naar de daken kijken. Daar staan de gebouwen in werkelijlkheid niet.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-03 06:38:05+00:00): In editor iD kun je ook een een achtergrond van de BGT openen. Dan zie je precies waar de gebouwen horen.
Kijk even met de  BGT. Niet alles was al goed ingemeten hier.  
Groet,
eggie
eggie (2026-04-03 06:47:48+00:00): Ik heb met de hand wat hersteld.
Dus geen revert uitgevoerd. Het lag daarvoor al verkeerd.
Wanneer een dak een puntdak heeft svp geen punten gaan tekenen aan de kopse kant. Dat klopt niet.
Frans S (2026-04-22 09:54:58+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
There is no need to map paths that only provide access to farmland. The focus lies on connecting settlements, buildings to the road network.
Best regards
Wildsharky (2026-04-03 12:10:38+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180797845
MassCartog (2026-04-03 13:46:42+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. Features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. They were created 15 years ago, and they still show significant heatmap traffic within the last 12 months. Not being public access or "unauthorized social trail" areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

You had it right before, the correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property
PaulS476 (2026-04-03 14:02:00+00:00): Yes, I understand your response completely.  However, the result is that these paths still show up on the map and that causes the continued foot traffic that you refer to.  Our next step is to “rip” these paths so they don’t exist on the ground.
MassCartog (2026-04-03 14:54:28+00:00): Thanks for the reply and your understanding. Yes, once they are removed completely from the ground, they can be removed from OSM.
VLD0251 (2026-04-07 12:19:39+00:00): You have made over 5,000 edits without providing any edit summaries or sources!
 قمت بإجراء أكثر من 5000 تعديل دون تقديم أي تعليق أو مصدر
clambake92115 (2026-04-28 18:09:07+00:00): There are strict rules about how the name tag should be used. One of the primary rules is that it shouldn't be used if "The feature is unnamed in the real world". These service roads do not have names. The many "SDG&E Service Roads" you've tagged in other changesets also fall under this. Please review https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
ajmat (2026-04-05 05:25:35+00:00): Revert of 180789167
Wildsharky (2026-04-03 12:13:53+00:00): Revert of 180783594
NeisBot (2026-04-03 00:09:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13702700746 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Umzugsunternehmen"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und faktischere Version deines Textes lauten: "Umzugsunternehmen"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-11 04:33:05+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180790939
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-01 02:31:10+00:00): Removed SEO spam description=* and name=* from POI and fix nearby building tagging in changeset 183474303

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183474303
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-01 02:30:23+00:00): Looks like this changeset removed the building=* tag, but it was added back in changeset 180954243

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180954243
willkmis (2026-06-04 13:31:12+00:00): Just noticed this change. I really don't think Highway 1 along the coast here should be trunk. It's not a major through route between major cities and is famously not a high speed route, at this point it's basically just used for touristic purposes and to link very small communities.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-06-04 18:36:29+00:00): State Route 1 is basically the only connection between these places. US 101 is too far way to do that.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-06-04 18:36:38+00:00): too far away*
btwhite92 (2026-06-17 23:07:35+00:00): Seconding disagreement with this stretch being 'trunk' and will be reverting. There are no two major population centers whose connection is primarily served by this highway. Trunk assignment in CA is largely done (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/California/2022_Highway_Classification_Guidelines), please discuss before upgrading large stretches of highway
spatialia (2026-06-18 01:16:51+00:00): Adding in that someone in Cambria who wants to go to Monterey would definitely go along US 101 rather than highway 1, unless they wanted to take the scenic route. It's not trunk. I've made this exact decision many times.
Carnildo (2026-06-18 20:46:01+00:00): When applying the "only connection" criteria, you also need to take into account the importance of the places.  WA-23 is basically the only connection between Steptoe, St. John, Lamont, and Sprague, but that doesn't make it trunk -- the four towns have a combined population smaller than some apartment buildings.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-06-19 00:34:25+00:00): Oh, okay then. I'll be more careful from here on out.
NeisBot (2026-04-03 00:27:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13702700746 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Umzugsunternehmen"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und faktischere Version deines Textes lauten: "Umzugsunternehmen"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-11 04:33:08+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181174285
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-01 02:28:50+00:00): Removed SEO spam description=* and name=* from POI and fix nearby building tagging in changeset 183474303

https://osm.org/changeset/183474303