piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-11-20 14:41:56+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly.

In total, I detected 36 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
- https://osm.org/way/979682992 | crossings=32

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174902173
silversurfer83 (2025-11-22 09:11:52+00:00): Hi there,

you requested a review.

With you having checked the way in person (source: survey) and judging from the aerials, this looks fine. Thanks for fixing this.

One thing: Please write your comment either in the predominant local language of the place you edited or in English. This helps the local community (should there be one) to understand easier.

happy mapping and safe travels
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174902207
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-08 01:58:56+00:00): Have you seen https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-historically-significant-sites-without-physical-representation/139032  ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-08 01:59:28+00:00): are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13319087502 in fact has a monument? Or is it only event location?
aTarom (2025-11-20 12:36:58+00:00): Hola, revierto este changeset, puedes indicar de que ejercicio se trata? elementos como parque que no los son y tags como ip=null?
ilias_ (2025-11-20 13:21:37+00:00): You could've separated your changeset in 2, one in the USA and one in Germany...
Yan Bakhmat (2025-11-20 21:35:10+00:00): Oops, my bad.
PhoenixStroh (2025-11-20 20:19:09+00:00): I am new so I would love some clarification. The opening_hours value seems to still be part of the feature even though your description says your change cleared it. Is there something wrong with the opening hours as it is?
user_5359 (2025-11-21 19:43:49+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours. You can also follow the link on the key opening_hours.
We write the time in 24-hour notation and do not abbreviate minutes or hours.
Linus W Frische (2025-11-20 12:26:48+00:00): Source: aerial imagery.
stillhart (2025-11-21 08:09:04+00:00): 🤘
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-04 06:43:10+00:00): Removed SEO spam tagline, fixed broken opening_hours=* syntax and corrected addr:street=* for SEO spam POI French Florist - Boca Raton in changeset 183626988

https://osm.org/changeset/183626988
CAM-Gerlach (2025-11-21 02:17:36+00:00): Thanks for the catch! One of my new custom presets had a typo that my bevy of validators didn't catch, sorry--in the process of further expanding my custom validator suite. Preset fixed going forward and also double-checked there were no other instances of it across the areas that I map. Thanks again!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174904231
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-20 21:34:55+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176197483
eggie (2025-11-20 13:56:04+00:00): Jeroen,

Hier heb ik je oprit losgemaakt van de residential van de gemeente.. 
Groet,
eggie
silversurfer83 (2025-11-20 19:02:34+00:00): Hi there,

it looks like you mistakenly modified the boundary relation of the Trosa kommun in this CS. Kindly check this and maybe fix it, ok?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/935460

cheers
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174905040
nmac85 (2025-11-21 00:05:59+00:00): appologies
NeisBot (2025-11-20 13:00:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-20 13:00:50+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Disaster restoration service"
NeisReview (2025-11-23 14:08:11+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/175027584
phodgkin (2025-11-23 18:45:22+00:00): I'm not clear why wikidata:brand =  Q37158 was changed to
not:wikidata:brand
This is the brand:wikidata used to identify Starbucks locations, for example, in this tool:
https://osm.mathmos.net/chains/Q37158/
JezCrow (2025-11-24 13:33:55+00:00): @phodgkin 
It's not just Starbucks:
- a Co-op Bank and a Skipton Building Society have had a not:brand:wikidata tag added;
- an NCP car park and a BT telephone have had a  not:operator:wikidata tag added; 
- Market Street East (way 4609521) had "fixme=add conditional restrictions" deleted but no restrictions were added
- Demon Ink Vintage (node 451726458) had "fixme=Moved?" deleted with no other update, but my online search shows this to be Marcus King Tailor now;
- 1st Degree Training (node 4517264558) also had the fixme tag deleted when their facebook page clearly shows a different address.
silversurfer83 (2026-01-16 21:58:44+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177317146
APneunzehn74 (2025-12-09 05:13:08+00:00): Hallo, ist im Kapellenweg jetzt Tempo 50 oder 30?
streckenkundler (2025-11-20 15:58:33+00:00): Hallo Norman, du hast hier um "review_requested" gebeten... Sieht doch gut aus! Ich freue mich!
Eine kleine Bitte zum Rundwanderweg... Schau dir mal Klein Köris an, und zwar hier: https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=16.0/52.1691/13.6843

Ist die Abweichung zwischen Rundwanderweg (grüner Punkt) und Fontanewanderweg (roter Balken) korrekt?
Grüße Sven
Norman Siehl (2025-11-24 10:39:06+00:00): Hi Sven, die Wanderwege laufen dort wirklich nicht parallel aber auch nicht so wie eingretragen ist... müsste den Fontaneweg (Straßenname) geradeaus weiter gehen bis er auf den RW Klein Köriser See trifft. Muss ich mir aber vor Ort nochmal genau anschauen und würde danach die Änderung anstoßen. Der mM richtige Verlauf ist auch hier zu finden: https://www.dahme-seenland.de/poi/dahme-seenland/wandertouren/fontanewanderweg-auf-den-spuren-der-sphinx/ 

Liebe Grüße
Norman
streckenkundler (2025-11-25 20:39:46+00:00): Hei Norman,

Aha...  ja da schau mal bitte nach... Der User @BER319 ist in Sachen Wanderwege auch sehr aktiv! Er hat hier viel gearbeitet. Kontakt habe ich zwar nicht, ich schätze aber, daß er Fragen beantworten wird...

Viele Grüße aus dem Spreewald,

Sven
BER319 (2025-11-26 09:48:17+00:00): Hallo Norman,

ich wurde von Sven hierzu eingeladen.

Ich habe den Weg vor ein paar Jahren erkundet. Der damalige Verlauf ist so wie hier dargestellet.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14274034#map=16/52.17167/13.67617&layers=N

Ich habe auch immer die wichtigsten Wegweiser und Routmarker mit in die Relation aufgenommen.
Deshalb sollte der Wegverlauf zu der damaligen Zeit auch so vor Ort markiert sein. Unterschiede im Wegverlauf auf https://www.dahme-seenland.de und der Markierung vor Ort habe ich sehr oft bei div. Routen feststellen können.

Markierungen im Jahr 2023, die den eingetragenen Wegverlauf bestätigen sollten. Da diese sehr neu aussehen wurde hier bestimmt der Wegverlauf angepasst und auf https://www.dahme-seenland.de vergessen.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=891532091948781

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1315950669359620

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=783484166428835

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=903772190852104

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=772144384452867


Was in den letzten beiden Jahren passiert und geändert wurde kann ich nicht beurteilen. Da hilft nur wirklich eine neue vor Ort Begehung durchführen.

Viele Grüße aus Berlin
BER319
BER319 (2025-11-26 09:54:09+00:00): @ Norman,

falls der Weg im Norden wirklich verlegt wurde, bitte die hier als Kreis dargestellten Routmarker und auch die nicht erfassten mit entfernen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16146352#map=16/52.17496/13.67539&layers=N
Danke
BER319
BER319 (2025-11-26 10:10:59+00:00): @Norman
Nachtrag zu Rundweg 
Ich habe gerade einmal nachgeschaut das waren 2023 auch nagelneue Markierungen am Wilhelmshorster Weg
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1513850209453107
Norman Siehl (2025-11-27 15:43:30+00:00): @BER319 ich schau mal wann ich Zeit finde um zu schauen. Ich melde mich mit Neuigkeiten sobald vorhanden. Liebe Grüße
grzegorz75jan (2025-11-21 08:41:47+00:00): Nie bardzo rozumiem tą edycję.
Opis jakiś niezrozumiały (masło maślane).
Dlaczego w edycji usunięto odnośnik Wikidata https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q16537247
oraz usunięto odnośnik do Wikipedii https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cmentarz_wojenny_nr_280_%E2%80%93_Por%C4%85bka_Uszewska a w zamian dodano odnośnik do nie istniejącego artykułu https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cmentarz_wojenny_nr_280_%E2%80%93_Do%C5%82y

Około rok temu zmieniałem lokalizację tego cmentarza ponieważ była błędna o około 100 metrów. 

Fakt, że pomimo aktualnej czy nawet poprzedniej lokalizacji cmentarza  na mapie znajduję się on administracyjnie w Dołach. Pozostawiłem choćby w nazwie Porąbka Uszewska. Być może miałem zamiar edytować później lub coś mi wtedy umknęło.

W Wielu miejscach (choćby odnośniki które dodałem do obiektu) jest mowa o Porąbce Uszewskiej ale to może być już błędne, nieaktualne choćby biorąc upływ czasu od kiedy te dane powstały.

Skoro cmentarz znajduje się  w miejscowości Doły to zamiast usuwać odnośnik WD zawierający w tytule miejscowość Doły należało zmienić w OSM nazwę cmentarza a starą umieścić w old_name a co do Wikipedii to zgłosić sprawę do nich lub przynajmniej dodać uwagę w OSM i/lub notatkę czy fixme do obiektu.

Intencje były dobre ale wykonanie trochę nie wyszło. Mimo to dziękuję bo przynajmniej zwróciło to moją uwagę.
Będę chciał wprowadzić dodatkowe korekty.

Przy okazji teraz znalazłem https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/kwatera-wojenna-zolnierz-922570 i tam już są Doły.

Dodatkowo jest jakby osobna mogiła (nie znam jej dokładnej lokalizacji i nie byłem tam 
https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/mogila-pojedyncza-zolnie-928284/dokumenty/PL.1.9.ZIPOZ.NID_EW_12_DK.611960/1

Ogólnie istniał tam cmentarz parafialny przypisany wtedy do Porąbki Uszewskiej https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/cmentarz-rzymskokatolick-678427 a cmentarz wojenny był jego częścią. Z dokumentacji wynika, że osobny grób żołnierza sowieckiego znajduje się po za obrębem cmentarza wojennego. Jeżeli będę miał okazję tam być to dodam go jako osobny obiekt.
Frank Peng (2026-01-13 02:30:05+00:00): Those roads within this newly constructed residential area would be better tagged as highway=residential rather than unclassified roads since they provide access to homes.
Frank Peng (2026-01-13 03:11:32+00:00): Those roads would be better tagged as highway=residential instead of unclassified roads since they're within a residential area.

Also, you added a bridge to where there is not actually a bridge. Just a cycle path crossing on the road. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1452341528
Please do not add non-existent features to OSM. Please only add features that actually exist on the ground.
Frank Peng (2026-01-13 03:15:49+00:00): Please don't just auto-accept the suggested fixes by the iD editor. You added a bridge to where there is not actually a bridge: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1452341528
Frank Peng (2026-01-13 03:27:33+00:00): Please do not damage valid map data by changing valid administrative/municipal boundaries into roads. This is not acceptable, and it damages the map. Also, please don't glue roads to administrative boundaries.
ejderuby (2025-11-20 13:48:25+00:00): Forgot to add source: https://athenabitcoin.com/atm-locations/?search=Indianapolis%2C+IN%2C+USA
infeeeee (2025-11-21 18:52:55+00:00): Szia!

Facebook oldalak címét nem a website hanem contact:facebook mezőben tároljuk. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:facebook

További jó térképezést!
infeeeee (2025-11-22 15:37:08+00:00): Javítottam: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174993605
Baloo79 (2025-11-24 16:54:57+00:00): Szia!
Rendben, köszönöm!
user_5359 (2025-11-21 09:02:54+00:00): Hello! If you're already drawing in parking routes, wouldn't it make sense to delete the lake as well? 
see discussion on  https://www.osm.org/changeset/174478608 (allowed sources)
oscarm_lyft (2025-11-22 00:04:25+00:00): Hi, user_5359! 
My name is Oscar Medinilla and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft.
You are right, I apologize for any inconvenience caused by my edits. I really appreciate your help by bringing this mistake to our attention. 
I removed the non exist pond in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174967691)

Best regards, Oscar Medinilla
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:34:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
multimob (2025-12-02 17:01:28+00:00): Hi, thanks for the mapping effort on bus stops in your area.

Small problem spotted: the correct way to name stops is like this: "Esch/Alzette, Gare routière". All the stops in the bus station must have the same name, this is how the software can correctly bundle them together. The A1 or B2 part saying the platform number does not go in the name field, it goes to "local_ref".
Jempo (2025-12-03 14:26:18+00:00): I see, thank you for the explanation! 
I changed it. Hope it is correct now.
rohieb (2025-12-28 21:31:30+00:00): Ist es deiner Meinung nach wirklich sinnvoll, einzelne Bäume als Punkte in den Wald zu setzen, sofern sie nicht weiter mit Baumart o.ä. beschrieben sind oder als Landmarke dienen…?
NeisBot (2025-11-20 17:58:24+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly.

In total, I detected 15 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
- https://osm.org/way/27937165 | crossings=15

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174910089
pitscheplatsch (2025-11-23 14:06:28+00:00): has been corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174932289
rskedgell_import (2025-11-20 19:48:52+00:00): Thanks for adding the separate sidewalks, but please don't add foot=no unless pedestrians are actually prohibited by law. If it's not a motorway and there aren't TSRGD 625.1 signs (and a traffic order), then pedestrians have an absolute right to use the carriageway.
rskedgell (2025-11-20 19:56:00+00:00): foot=no tags removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174922425
callum_tfl (2025-11-20 22:39:59+00:00): Thank you I didn’t realise that!
rskedgell (2025-11-20 23:49:31+00:00): No problem, it's probably one of the most common misunderstandings with access tags in the UK. Generally access tags should reflect the legal situation rather than whether it's safe or appropriate for a particular access mode.

Pedestrian routing software may prefer to use the separate sidewalks and tags like sidewalk:both=separate on the road should help with that. I think there are some cases where the implementation chooses to ignore separate sidewalks, in which case foot=no on the road might cause a problem.
bxl-forever (2025-11-20 15:59:06+00:00): ## REVERTED CHANGESET

Dear geoTD, you keep submitting the same (false) information over and over.

I wrote to you several times.

Sint-Lukas is already properly mapped as a university site.  There is no need to make it appear like multiple universities.  And the "A Blok" is just a building (or more precisely a building part) inside the campus.  "A Blok" is not an independant university on its own.

You should NOT map "A Blok" as a university.

I have tried to explain this to you mutiple times.  Instead, you chose to ignore comments and you kept resubmitting the same changes several times.

You are also damaging the address system.

I am aware that the OSM data model can be complicated, and new users do not know everything.  But your persistent refusal to address the comments that have been emailed to you is very disappointing.

You seem to be very desirous to see this part of the university on the map.  How can we help?  First, can you tell us if you use a third-party app that reads OSM data and that does not show the required information.  We can start investigating this (some apps use outdated data and won’t show you recent changes).
VA00 (2025-11-20 19:20:43+00:00): Ale jak rozumiem, łącznika jeszcze nie ma. Ustawienie bicycle=yes jest chyba przedwczesne. Czy odcinek ,,starej'' drogi rowerowej został już ,,zaorany''?
velomalopolska (2025-11-20 19:37:01+00:00): Tak, jest tak jak piszesz. Poprawiłem żeby to pokazać. Relacja został rozcięta budową mostu (jest wysoki nasyp teraz), czekamy na wybudowanie łącznika pod mostem. Jest wyznakowany tymczasowy objazd.
YomanNH (2025-12-05 12:48:43+00:00): Dzięki za poprawki! Dorzuciłem jeszcze construction=cycleway do tego budowanego łącznika pod mostem, żeby było jasne, że będzie to droga dla rowerów.
eggie (2025-11-20 15:53:49+00:00): Dag Jop..
Wellicht even het adres compleet maken.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2025-11-20 19:17:26+00:00): addr:city toegevoegd
jopvandijk (2025-11-22 17:38:50+00:00): Ha eggie, ja is goed! Welke informatie mis je nog? Groetjes, Jop
eggie (2025-11-22 18:42:29+00:00): Hoi.

Evt phone=+31....
Mapse.
eggie
jopvandijk (2025-11-23 16:15:22+00:00): Dag eggie,

Goede suggestie, dank je wel! Deze instantie is niet per telefoon bereikbaar, zullen we het telefoonnummer achterwege laten?

Met vriendelijke groet, Jop
eggie (2025-11-23 16:21:13+00:00): Lijkt me wel dan.
mapse
Sylabowy Kot (2025-11-20 16:49:49+00:00): Musiałem skasować opis działalności - w OpenStreetMap nie może mieć on brzmienia samopromocji. Więcej informacji jak to robić: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/chce-dodac-swoja-firme-do-mapy-w-osm-watek-ogolny/135487
Sylabowy Kot (2025-11-20 16:50:50+00:00): Dodatkowo opis zmiany nie może być kropką - nic to nie mówi pod kątem oceny zmian, jedynie zwróciło na siebie negatywną uwagę.
rempshaener (2025-11-20 18:46:56+00:00): Hallo,
zu deinen Bearbeitungen habe ich folgende Anmerkungen:
- Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie.
- Am Beispiel von www.openstreetmap.org/node/13319448564:
natural=water passt nicht zu emergency=water_tank
Um was handelt es sich hier?
Viele Grüße
user_5359 (2025-11-21 09:36:56+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13319479734. What is the mean of the tag Грабовача = heath
rarad74 (2025-11-20 18:31:14+00:00): Hi. You deactivated a big poligon between Bacau and Adjud. In Romania alot of them are part of a bigger multipoligon. You cannot convert in simple poligons  only a part of some of them , because are part from a bigger relation. So please revert this action. Tnak you.
rarad74 (2025-11-20 18:34:43+00:00): Sorry. It wasn't your mistake. Someone else deleted part of that multipoligon.
GBAB (2025-11-21 07:43:12+00:00): OK, no problem ;-)
DariaDX (2025-11-26 22:45:42+00:00): Witam. Widzę, że w końcu droga jest budowana.

Moje uwagi:
https://www.osm.org/way/1425781338 i https://www.osm.org/way/1425781339 jest dalej jako planowana droga. To jest wliczone do budowy i przebudowy DW nr 276. Poprawię to.

Z góry dziękuję za edycję mapy
DariaDX
evgenykatyshev (2025-11-20 16:32:17+00:00): Hello! Are you sure that the car rental office is placed exatly in the middle of road, not aside?
NeisBot (2025-11-20 15:48:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-20 15:48:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Petroleum products company"
NeisReview (2025-11-23 14:07:32+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/174912618
ChangwooRyu (2025-11-21 11:18:09+00:00): It's not about opinions and which side you support. Your edit is against OSM's on-the-ground rule.
SomeoneElse (2025-12-13 21:31:22+00:00): Hello,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.  Please respect each other's names for things - as you can see from https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/456788679 there have been numerous deletions by several users, including both of you.
If you continue to do that we will have to prevent you from editing OSM.
ChangwooRyu (2025-12-14 08:36:34+00:00): Hello,

I don't care and don't touch name:ja, like what I did against this edit. But often same vandal edits include deletions of Korean names and additions of name:ja and I should revert the whole edits. Do you think I should spend much energy to identify which is useful or not in vandal edits?
ChangwooRyu (2025-12-14 09:21:31+00:00): OK I realized I deleted name:ja of way 456788679, I'm sorry about that, and restored it. As I said, It's part of what the JOSM reverter did. 

Todays Dokdo vandal edits are more complicated than past ones years ago, often they are disguised as normal but include problamatic changes. I cannot just exclude "normal" additions from reverts. So I hope you do not judge users just based on number of deletes.
evgenykatyshev (2025-11-20 16:29:58+00:00): Hello! Thanks for fixing name, but why did you delete name:ru and name:ka tags with correct names?
qoro (2025-11-20 17:50:52+00:00): Must've been a mistake on my part
ceirios (2025-11-20 19:05:32+00:00): Hi Bearman Creative,

Croeso i OSM! I just want to point a couple of things out to you

Buildings, when possible, should be squared - you can do this by clicking the building and pressing Q on your keyboard.

Also, house names should go in the top part of the address field, not the "name" field. 

If you have any questions let me know!

Cofion and happy mapping
Ceirios
JezCrow (2025-11-24 13:49:31+00:00): In this changeset you've deleted a building (way 145418387) opposite the Civic Centre on Saint Mary's Place where Costa Coffee is/was. Has this really been demolished?
Cebderby (2025-11-25 15:44:09+00:00): This changeset changed the access for motor vehicles on way
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461119575
as if the restriction sign (bus + taxi, bicycle and motorbike only 7am to 7pm) had been removed, but leaving the conditional restriction tags in place.  Which is it? sign still there (tagging was correct as it was) or sign removed (conditional restriction needs deleting) ?
Please respond to changeset comments
NorthOfEnglandMaps (2025-11-25 16:15:47+00:00): The sign is still there but has changed
phodgkin (2025-11-26 18:07:25+00:00): "motor_vehicle=permissive" only makes sense on a private-owned highway, whereas this is a public highway. Access restrictions are complex, so I think you need to explain how exactly the sign has changed.
NorthOfEnglandMaps (2025-11-27 11:18:56+00:00): The sign now just says no cars. Though, they are allowed 7am to 7pm so I believed permissive was the best fitting tag. It also opens onto percy street which is permissive access 7am to 7pm.