piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-28 08:12:51+00:00): Like in changeset 186374149 and others, it seems you are drawing driveways and footways as areas rather than linear ways leading to all sorts of issues and iD errors that you must have chosen to bypass. While in theory you could modify the tagging, add the required linear ways as well and also make any other required changes to follow the relevant guideline, like there I'd strongly recommend just reverting this (which I can do for you, or in this case you can simply delete the single way here) and re-add them as linear features instead.

https://osm.org/changeset/186374149
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-29 18:16:50+00:00): Fixed by the original mapper in changeset 186534842, thanks!

https://osm.org/changeset/186534842
Frans S (2026-07-11 12:45:16+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (See attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping. 

B: Overlapping buildings.

C: Collected adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.

D: Connecting nodes to other features.

E: Buildings not squared or rounded.



Explanation can be found in this document, which might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards, and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185515392
themapper53 (2026-07-11 09:10:47+00:00): Hei, miksi muutit Kyöpelinvuorenpuiston polut footwayksi? Mielestäni niille sopii paremmin highway-tagin arvo path.
kartoittaa (2026-07-12 14:38:35+00:00): Hei,
Omasta mielestäni niille taas sopii footway-arvo paremmin, kun kyseessä on kuitenkin urbaaniin puistoon rakennetut kivituhkapäällysteiset leveät kulkuväylät. Wikin ja foorumin keskustelujen pohjalta olen myös ymmärtänyt, että tapana on käyttää path-arvoa lähinnä metsäpolkuihin. Wikissä (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fi:Piirto-ohjeet_Suomessa#Jalkak%C3%A4yt%C3%A4v%C3%A4t,_py%C3%B6r%C3%A4tiet_ja_muut) on myös erillinen maininta juurikin puistokäytävistä, että 
"Rakennetuilla puistokäytävillä, joita ei ole erityisesti merkitty liikennemerkillä, saa liikkua sekä jalan että pyörällä; mahdollinen merkintä on on highway=footwayja on bicycle=yes".
themapper53 (2026-07-13 07:42:21+00:00): Selvä, tämä olikin mennyt minulta ohi, kiitos tiedosta
nevw (2026-07-11 05:06:14+00:00): Hi Geoff, is this unit 132 and the whole of St Ives Murdoch is 22 Windelya Road.
nevw (2026-07-11 05:42:58+00:00): I changed the tags here to 
addr:housenumber 	22
addr:street 	Windelya Road
addr:unit 	132
to conform with osm norms.
nevw (2026-07-11 05:10:03+00:00): Should this section of Wagtail Close have access=private?
nevw (2026-07-11 05:37:57+00:00): Looks open to public until the gate so left as is
nevw (2026-07-11 05:09:31+00:00): Hi Geoff, should this street also have access=private tag?
nevw (2026-07-11 05:39:37+00:00): I added access=private to Botany Road North as it is behind the gate
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-11 06:00:57+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the added name real?
name=Amazon Beach Bar Plazh
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338110168/history/14
Abu@ (2026-07-11 10:59:06+00:00): Real Name : 
AMAZON BEACH BAR - GRILL & PIZZERI
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-11 11:11:48+00:00): Hi, 

thanks for adding Amazon Beach Bar. 

The way you edited is the entire Shëngjin Beach, not the business, so changing its name to “Amazon Beach Bar Plazh” renamed the whole beach. The separate restaurant node you created is the correct place for the business. Please restore https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338110168 to name=Plazhi i Shëngjinit and keep the business name only on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14004353001 

Please also check the exact spelling and use normal capitalization. 

Thanks!
Kovoschiz (2026-07-11 09:02:41+00:00): 1. What's the reason?
2. I don't see how this is made asymmetric? 
3. Yip Fat St's U-shape is an `=unclassified` minor road serving the local roads (short one in the middle; and around Evergreen Industrial Mansion), so it should be connected with a `=tertiary`
Kovoschiz (2026-07-11 09:06:12+00:00): 1. You forgot Nam Long Shan Rd northbound is bus-only left turn to WCH Rd westbound
vectorial8192 (2026-07-11 11:07:43+00:00): Good observations.

The overall concept is: "Wong Chuk Hang Estate / Sham Wan". The historic Nam Long Shan Road both-way tertiary is replaced by the one-way Ocean Park Road -> Heung Yip Road -> Police School Road -> Nam Long Shan Road giant gyratory. Normally, pass-thru vehicles do not need to enter Heung Yip Road. This is asymmetry.

Though indeed I really forgot about the ordinarily no-right-turn at Route 1. I did visit this place in the past, so that's a mapping blunder.
vectorial8192 (2026-07-11 11:12:06+00:00): But other than that, it should be OK for unclassified roads to join together to form a (wide) network of unclassified roads for local areas. It just so happens that, very often in HK, the roads are planned such that some unclassified roads are "forced" to become tertiary despite visually looking similar to nearby streets (e.g. Yu Chau Street at SSP).
Kovoschiz (2026-07-12 09:40:39+00:00): 1. What about Shum Wan Rd or Nam Long Shan Rd to OP Waterfront? 
2. I'm mostly asking about Heung Yip Rd asymmetricalness
3. `=unclassified` can be fine inside that part of a district, but Heung Yip Rd is a significant road of the district. It connects OP, while most traffic may use the interchange.
Kovoschiz (2026-07-12 09:43:21+00:00): 3. So I won't make it the `=unclassified` in the middle only. There should be some continuity and extent.
vectorial8192 (2026-07-14 17:04:53+00:00): Re 1, I am inclined to believe that, due to traffic light phases, we have the following:

- from Shum Wan, it might be faster for vehicles to reach Route 1 first, and then turn back to OP
- from OP, if needing to reach Aberdeen and beyond, just turn straight to Route 1 westbound, which simply has no traffic lights, compared to Heung Yip Road having 2 (chained?) lights

Vehicles can still take Heung Yip Road for being the shortest-distance path, but generally speaking Route 1 should be much better than Heung Yip Road, unless HYR is a strict requirement (e.g. Nam Long Shan Road ordinarily cannot turn left to Route 1).

Or maybe these are on wrong premises, idk; eg what about the ordinarily-green traffic light outside Graham Hospital, is it somehow chained (or not) with HYR, this I do not know.
Frans S (2026-07-12 13:11:51+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please tag buildings just as building=yes.
Building:part is used when you map f.i 
an elevator housing on a flat roof.
Best regards
Jnrf (2026-07-12 17:53:07+00:00): Good. Thanks for the correction!
Flynn Marquardt (2026-07-11 06:38:01+00:00): relation/11322526
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-30 21:26:12+00:00): Unfortunately, use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies, and may violate local law -- see https://osm.wiki/Google for more details.

Therefore, I am required to revert your changes, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186670081

If you can independently verify some (or all) of this information with allowed sources that do not involve Google Maps (e.g. in person survey, the city bus website, etc), then you may add that information, taking care to use correct tagging.

Happy mapping!
pwbriggs (2026-07-13 20:31:34+00:00): Thanks for the cleanup. People seem to go crazy about Flock specifically and then incorrectly map every camera as manufactured by Flock. So thanks for verifying these.

When you remove the manufacturer=* tag, you should also remove manufacturer:wikidata=* Wikidata (https://www.wikidata.org/) is a machine-readable knowledge base, so tags like manufacturer often come effectively in pairs, with the older manufacturer=* tag spelling out the name, and the manufacturer:wikidata=* tag providing the wikidata Q id for modern Wikidata-enhanced users of the data.

Do you want me to remove the wikidata tags for you or would you like to take care of them yourself?

--

One other note, I also noticed that sometimes you replaced surveillance:type=ALPR with surveillance:type=camera, but sometimes you removed surveillance:type=* entirely. Was that intentional (e.g. if you weren't sure what type of device it was), or are they all cameras?

Thanks again for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
hvGEbPK5 (2026-07-16 05:31:26+00:00): Hi @pwbriggs,
Thanks for the comment. I don't really know how to use openstreetmap that well and would appreciate you helping clean up. Thanks
Gerhard24 (2026-07-11 07:31:59+00:00): *Added: Halteplätze
Vmosnokia31 (2026-07-15 14:38:01+00:00): Hello bạn👋 Tại sao bạn lại xóa AB Quán Trạch, CD Quán Trạch vậy? Tôi cũng thấy bạn xóa vài landuse  nhưng không thay hay sửa lại gì, thêm nữa là edit của bạn cũng đã dính vài lỗi cơ bản. Bạn đề là "Cleanup in progress" nhưng không sửa lại trong 4 ngày qua.
Tewuzij (2026-07-19 09:12:06+00:00): Well, the edits made in this area is regrettably so bad that I can't fix them all on my own. Hope that you can do it instead. You should put priority on former districts and landuses, as they are the most brutally affected by these edits
Vmosnokia31 (2026-07-19 09:26:51+00:00): I have reverted your changeset in changeset 185889265 since your fix attempt had several bugs and issues. I'll see what I can do.
Tewuzij (2026-07-19 10:09:17+00:00): Also, the "AB" and "CD" names are absolutely sus, since AFAIK there is no way any Vietnamese village would be named like that, so it might be better to check if they actually exist
Vmosnokia31 (2026-07-19 11:38:24+00:00): AB Quán Trạch and CD Quán Trạch do exist, you can search it up. It's named Thôn A, B, C, D (Quán Trạch) unlike the usual Thôn 1, 2, 3...; AB was grouped together and so did CD.  You should research a bit before removing the labels.
mini-me (2026-07-11 08:18:43+00:00): Я бы взглянул на этот фильтр
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-11 08:20:35+00:00): В плане? Что за фильтр или что исправить?
mini-me (2026-07-11 08:23:55+00:00): Overpass QL в ревертере. Как вы отфильтровали сдвиги точек
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-11 08:35:26+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osm-revert#Options 

+ у меня в скрипте можно накликать объект этот фильтр и видеть не откатили ли уже объект

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/better-osm-org-a-script-that-adds-useful-little-things-to-osm-org/121670/112#p-1124773-partial-revert-of-changesets-1
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-11 08:41:30+00:00): Вот здесь на стриме можно посмотреть как я им пользуюсь https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTA_CWhyaCU&t=7359s (ну если вытерпеть мой нетороплимый темп :)
mini-me (2026-07-11 08:52:58+00:00): Опаньки... Не знал про эту фичу в скрипте👍
dafadllyn (2026-07-15 19:41:36+00:00): Salut
Ich habe mir erlaubt, das neue Stauffacher-Geschäft im Bahnhof Bern auf planned:shop=stationery zu ändern, weil es noch nicht eröffnet ist (voraussichtlich erst im Spätsommer) und keine Bücher im Sortiment haben wird (sondern Papeterie- und Geschenkartikel sowie Spiele).
Lieben Gruss
Piagno (2026-07-15 19:45:08+00:00): passt danke, ja war bisschen komisch, es leitet einen direkt auf orell-füssli (welche primär bücher anbieten)
Equalizer379 (2026-07-11 08:07:56+00:00): Removed single node feature "Reef Island", moved its tags to the area.

My bad for pushing comment-less changeset.
FajrAl (2026-07-19 16:24:30+00:00): Most buildings have been mapped, but many building footprints are significantly misaligned with the Bing imagery. Since Bing imagery has very good resolution in this area, please review and realign the geometries where appropriate before marking the task as complete. Tip: Press Q to square rectangular buildings.
HantDX (2026-07-11 10:38:05+00:00): Мост через реку Свислочь у пл. Победы не полностью закрыт на реконструкцию - общественный транспорт может по нему ездить.
opendcc (2026-07-26 10:45:19+00:00): Tagging als assembly_point dann besser.
el_tommo (2026-07-13 08:06:58+00:00): Moin samgio183,
Der Name-Tag soll nur verwendet werden, um einen spezifischen Namen zu erwähnen. Wie beispielsweise bei Alpenrod, wo zwei Windräder tatsächlich einen Namen haben, der in Großbuchstaben auf ihnen prangt.
„Windrad“ gehört nicht dazu und geht aus den vorhandenen Tags bereits ausreichend hervor. (Falls das deine Intention war: Sobald sie fertig gebaut sind und aus construction:power power wird, erscheinen sie auch auf den Karten)
Grüße
Thomas
user_5359 (2026-07-12 16:55:04+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28490353. What is the mean of the tag 1=2?
shrimp crevette (2026-07-11 09:41:12+00:00): J'ai par erreur fusionné ce changeset avec le replacement des arbres de la rue Général Mangin.
VLD0251 (2026-07-11 10:34:41+00:00): Hi Ali_Alg,

Changeset comments such as “Setif Update”, “Bougaa Update” or “Bir Ghbalou Bouira” are too generic and do not describe the actual changes made. Please use more specific comments to make review and follow-up of contributions easier. OSM good practices: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Happy mapping,
Fraxi (2026-07-11 11:20:34+00:00): Извинявай, може ли да погледнеш телефона за пекарна "Зиа"? Според мен трябва или да започва с ±359 2 или с ±359 56 тъй като имат обекти в Бургас според сайта. Коя е правилната цифра?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185526715
Fraxi (2026-07-11 11:22:51+00:00): Ааа...офф... прощавай, заради интервалите се обърках. Игнорирай предния коментар
Orxan-Mamedov (2026-07-11 12:27:13+00:00): Bu dəyişikliyi mən etməmişəm, ləğv etmək istəyirəm.
HantDX (2026-07-11 09:59:21+00:00): А чем вас так не устроили name:pl что удаляете их отовсюду?
wizerbar (2026-07-15 05:20:40+00:00): я паважаю польскую мову, але лічу, што беларус павінен хвалявацца за беларускую мову, а не лётаць па ўсей мапе Беларусі дадаючы польскія ды літоўскія назвы. гэта праца больш падыходзіць сапраўдным палякам ды літоўцам. прабачце калі абразіў вас назваўшы "беларусам".
HantDX (2026-07-16 11:34:50+00:00): Не знаю, как по мне, эти названия никому не мешают, а карта должна быть максимально информативной, в т.ч. и для нац. меньшинств и/или людей из соседних стран. В особенности это касается костёлов, усадеб, названий н.п. и т.д. Поэтому пусть будут, я считаю.
wizerbar (2026-07-20 05:55:08+00:00): Дэ-факта нац.меньшасцю ў Беларусі зьяўляюцца самі беларусы, якія намагаюцца шанаваць родную мову. Пры гэтым прапагандай польскае мовы чамусьці займаюцца не палякі, а менавіта беларусы. Акрамя таго навігацыйныя праграмы ўжо даўно могуць рабіць транслітэрацыю нават калі няма int_name. Паважаю вашу думку, але прывяду адзін прыклад - ці будзе іншаземец, які выпадкова патрапіў ў Беларусь, шукаць Green str., Žalia gatvė ці Grün Str., калі яму спатрэбіцца знайсці вуліцу Зяленую ў Гародні?
HantDX (2026-07-22 10:29:34+00:00): Карты ничего не пропагандируют и не могут пропагандировать, они лишь информируют, и чем детальнее и подробнее информируют, тем лучше. А в отношении имён в чём-то я, наверно, соглашусь: если есть уверенность, что имена нарицательные нормально автоматически переведутся или оттранслитерируются, то их можно не дублировать на других языках. Но это зачастую не касается имён собственных по типу топонимов и т.д. По поводу названий улиц не уверен, скорее всего они не переводятся в качестве исключения.
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-12 05:05:43+00:00): Hi, thanks for doing this, just noticed you used building=terrace for individual houses though, but it should be building=house, house=terraced (terrace is for a whole row). I've fixed the ones I've found
CanopyFalls (2026-07-12 05:15:52+00:00): Ah thanks! It's the terracing tool in JOSM, I forget to change it from terraced to house sometimes as it auto fills the value already on the building.
Wally_PL (2026-07-14 19:17:02+00:00): Czy ten tag jest stosowany na większą skalę?
grzegorz75jan (2026-07-14 19:35:14+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:activation

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/crossing:activation

https://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/crossing%3Aactivation/
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-11 13:39:37+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information. Furthermore, use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies--see https://osm.wiki/Google 

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185538320
BCNorwich (2026-07-11 11:19:07+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OenStreetMap.
Is the AED really on the grass, or is it fixed to the hall wall? Joining it to the building outline as accurately as you can would help folk to locate it. If not, can you tell me its exact position, please?

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2026-07-11 11:19:56+00:00): Hi, is the AED fixed to a wall?
Marvk (2026-07-11 13:19:24+00:00): Hallo Russpelz,

warum hast du hier building=yes entfernt? Zudem wird building:levels=* anders genutzt, hier wird in Zahlen eingetragen, wie viele Etagen das Gebäude hat.
limes11 (2026-07-11 18:27:12+00:00): Hallo RKermit, 

ist der Weg auch nicht mehr mit dem nördlichen Abschnitt verbunden ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1537444274

Das sind alles offizielle Wege im Geoportal. Wenn die noch existieren und vor Ort nicht baulich gesperrt bzw. entsprechend beschildert sind, dann gibt es keinen Grund access-tags zu setzen. 

Ich wurde in der Gegend auch schon einmal mündlich gebeten, gewisse Wege zu verlassen, da sie zu einer Wildäsungszone gehören. (Was das Betretungsrecht nicht einschränkt.) Stellte sich heraus, dass es von Wanderern genervte Jäger waren, die versuchten durch falsche Verweise auf Gesetzestexte Leute einzuschüchtern.

Grüße, Limes
RKermit (2026-07-12 09:24:24+00:00): Hallo Limes,
zu der Änderung der Wege am Gesterbach: Dort mag es auf einigen Abschnitten erlaubt sein zu laufen (von oben kommend hinunter zum Gesterbach gibt es jedoch ein Verbotsschild "Wildschutzzone"), aber es gibt schlicht die Wege nicht mehr. (Absolut unpassierbar; jedenfalls ab da wo ich es gelöscht habe - bitte gerne selber prüfen).  Zum Thema Wildschutzgebit: Ob dieses Schild ("Wildschutzgebiet - Betreten verboten") rechtlich bindend ist, will ich gerne noch prüfen - bin da auch skeptisch. Jedoch: ich habe am oberen Teil des Gesterbach mehrfach Tiere aufgeschreckt (gesehen Rehe und gehört - krachende Zweige im Gestrüpp, weil Rehe?/Wildschweine?panisch die Flucht ergriffen) - habe mich dort so unwohl gefühlt (als Ruhestörer) wie noch nie auf einer Wanderung (und ich laufe viel). Grundsätzlich sollten die Forstbetriebe selbst Verbotszonen in den OSM Karten einzeichnen. (Ich sehe halt nur die Schilder - oder werde angesprochen von einem verärgerten Forstarbeiter)
RKermit (2026-07-12 09:52:26+00:00): Hallo Limes, 
ich habe eben herausgefunden welches Forstamt dort zuständig ist. Ich werde  versuchen zu klären was es mit die Verbotsschildern auf sich hat und meine Änderung (kein Durchgang) ggf anpassen. Was die Unpassierbarkeit der gelöschten Wegabschnitte betrifft - dabei bleibe ich aber.
limes11 (2026-07-12 10:29:23+00:00): Hallo RKermit, 

wenn die Wege nicht mehr existieren, ist es natürlich in Ordnung. Die Daten aus dem Geoportal sind zwar offiziell, in vielen Fällen aber hoffnungslos veraltet. Auch die Verbotsschilder müssen wir osm-technisch nicht anzweifeln, Wildruhezonen können gesperrt werden. 

Mir ging es um willkürliche nd nicht-nachvollziehbare Verbote, so wie ich es in dieser Gegend erlebt habe. Dein Fall ist anders gestrickt. Nachfrage bei Forstamt ist natürlich  immer eine gute Idee. Insbesondere bei dem Bergenacker Weg, wobei sich da auch die Frage stellt, ob die Bezeichnung tatsächlich auf der gesamten Länge korrekt ist, im Geoportal ist nur das untere Drittel so gekennzeichnet.
shrimp crevette (2026-07-11 11:00:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185530903
literan (2026-07-11 12:32:56+00:00): зачем вы здесь дороги переломали? откачу
Vozduhan (2026-07-11 13:40:08+00:00): Случайно получилось (лаг)
Marvk (2026-07-11 13:18:00+00:00): Hallo Opiharry,

korrigiere mich, wenn ich falsch liege, aber der Name ist wohl ein Fall von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name und sollte daher nicht so getaggt werden.

Grüße
Marv
Opiharry (2026-07-12 09:28:05+00:00): Hallo Marv, 
ja, du hast recht. Es reicht, wenn der neu angelegte Weg mit: "naturbelassener Feld- und Wiesenweg beschrieben wird. Dankeschööööön und viele Grüße

Harald Scheil (Opiharry)
foreigner037 (2026-07-14 12:36:25+00:00): Здравей,

това автоматизирана промяна ли е?
flohoff (2026-07-12 09:28:13+00:00): Ich habe da auf die AMpeln noch ein traffic_signals:direction nachgetragen.

Ampeln gehen im routing mit einer "Zeitstrafe" ein an dem punkt der ampel. Hier ist ja immer nur eine einzurechnen. Dafür braucht man die richtungen.
flohoff (2026-07-12 09:28:59+00:00): Ach ja - bin drauf gekommen weil die änderung diese routingänderung zu folge hatte - Rot alt - Grün neu.

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=523256,1303453#52.0028,8.60538,14z
Comino (2026-07-13 09:03:42+00:00): Hi,

In your “Cos & Pi” edit you used the tag " disused:amenity=cafe".

With tags like website and social media up, it looks to me like a still active and operating restaurant. Is my assumption correct and shouldn't the tag be “amenity=restaurant” or maybe “shop=vacant”?

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
lunar_jaws812 (2026-07-14 04:59:23+00:00): Hi Edwin,

If I recall correctly, if an amenity is marked as defunct using the Every Door editor, then the default behavior is to replace the `amenity` tag with `disused:amenity` and leave almost all the other tags unchanged.

In contrast, in Street Complete, marking an amenity as defunct gets rid of most non-address tags and replaces the amenity with `shop=vacant`.

Seeing that both editors are pretty popular yet use different schemes for defunct amenities, and seeing that the wiki has documentation for both methods, I would assume both methods are considered acceptable by the community, though I've never really talked to anybody about it.
lunar_jaws812 (2026-07-14 05:04:01+00:00): Looking at the wiki article https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:amenity, maybe instead of leaving the website=* and contact:instagram=* tags unchanged, it would be better to do something like disused:website=* and disused:contact:instagram=*? I guess that's something to discuss on the forums or OSM US Slack.
Comino (2026-07-14 09:52:42+00:00): Thanks for the detailed explanation.

What I don't quite get is why all the other/outdated tags are kept in a case like that. 

Keeping all the addr:* tags + shop=vacant + an updated check_date=* tag is a better fit and cleans up the database nicely too. And yeah, definitely something that could be discussed on the forum.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:14:32+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20934
Zrop (2026-07-11 14:51:55+00:00): Hallo ticki_52,
wieso hast Du hier "landuse=residential" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117963429 gelöscht ? Diese Gelände ist offiziell als Wohngebiet ausgewiesen. Jetzt steht das Wohngebäude mitten im "natural=scrub", was nicht stimmt.

Und wieso hast Du den Parkplatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/866669476 vergößert und auf "parking=surface" geändert und dann auch noch mit dem "highway=service" verklebt ? Der Parkplatz war vorher korrekt eingezeichnet und als "parking=street_side" eingetragen.

Wieso wurde diese Brücke https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1184129343 gelöscht ?

Warum hast Du hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356654764 die "barrier" gelöscht ?

Auch die anderen Änderungen sind sehr fragwürdig.

Gruß
Zrop
silversurfer83 (2026-07-11 17:35:02+00:00): Moin Zrop

Da ticki_52 aktuell viel Quark macht und auf konkrete Nachfrage keine hilfreichen Aussagen trifft bin ich für Vollrevert