piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JeroenHoek (2026-01-21 18:33:44+00:00): De verpakkingsgroottes zijn bij de Makro en Sligro wel groter, maar het is in essentie een grote supermarkt. Deels voor de horeca, en deels gewoon voor burgers die toevallig een bedrijf hebben. Je kan er ook gewoon terecht voor kreeft als je een stucadoorsbedrijf runt…

Würth verschilt net zo van de Toolstation er tegenover: grotere (bulk)verpakkingen naast de gebruikelijke voorraad van zo'n winkel.

Momenteel taggen we dit soort zaken met shop=wholesale, omdat wholesale ook letterlijk dat betekent:

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/wholesale

Verkoop aan bedrijven, maar absoluut niet aan particulieren. Het gaat niet per se om bulk, hoewel het meestal wel om grotere hoeveelheden gaat.
muralito (2026-01-20 15:12:11+00:00): Hola. En varios de estos radares falto agregar el maxspeed que controlan. Si lo conoces estaria bueno agregarlo.
mueschel (2026-01-24 14:46:19+00:00): Hi,
you added "SIMULADA" / "SIMULADO" / "sIMULADA" tags to several speed cameras. These are not common - what do you want to tag there?
GeoRedSolucionesUruguay (2026-01-24 15:09:04+00:00): No Tengo las velocidades de los que indique sin velocidad, en otros sí tenía el dato y lo agregué, lamento no contar con ese dato
GeoRedSolucionesUruguay (2026-01-24 15:10:17+00:00): Con respecto a la etiqueta simulada corresponde a radares que no multan, solamente indican que se circula a velocidad alta, pueden Agregar fotomulta sin avisar en cualquier momento
mueschel (2026-01-24 15:13:57+00:00): Thanks for the explanation! For these we have a dedicated tag:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dspeed_display
pwbriggs (2026-01-19 06:31:28+00:00): I don't see a camera at the exact spot you indicated, however, there is a school zone speeding ticket ALPR about 50ft north of the lcoation you indicated, is that the camera you meant? As far as I'm aware, Flock Safety doesn't make those. Please confirm.
Dnar89 (2026-01-19 06:45:10+00:00): 47.3603070, -122.1762129

There’s the coordinates for that camera. It’s near the speed camera but opposite side of the road.
dknelson9876 (2026-01-20 02:48:32+00:00): Hello Caysem, welcome to OSM and mapping in Utah! We're happy to have you. Can you tell me if there's any signage here to indicate the intended users of this path? As you've mapped it so far, some data consumers may assume that it it only intended for cyclists, and not people on foot. If it is intended for both, the more specific thing to do would be to add bicycle=designated and foot=designated. Feel free to ask any questions if this is unclear!
silversurfer83 (2026-01-19 19:44:36+00:00): Hi :)

I'd like to point out two things to you:

- it looks like you moved a node at the airport billund which is something that happens when we try to move the map around in edit mode. I fixed that for you. (if you wish to see what I mean just follow https://osmcha.org/changesets/177398366?aoi=6259f256-64b4-4bd5-97ad-2e4bc79d949c)

- you frequently simply state "korrektur" or similar as comment. That isn't really helpful so I'd like to point you towards https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

if you have any questions regarding anything OSM please drop by c.osm.org or one of the chatgroups

cheers
felipeeugenio (2026-01-19 11:49:53+00:00): Hola. Gracias por la edición. Calle 2 estaba simplemente mal? o cambió el nombre?

Si no para dejar Calle 2 como nombre antiguo (old_name=). Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177398793
Warin61 (2026-02-23 00:21:05+00:00): Hi,
This construction is now finished? Can you confirm that the train route that use these lines under construction can now use them ... that they continue to use the same lines (the northern side of the station)???
LachlanTansey2009 (2026-02-23 03:43:11+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out, I forgot to undo this yesterday. Will do it now.
NeisBot (2026-01-19 07:26:57+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13465212083 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Lighting store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-27 06:39:27+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177749513
(No visible changes after review)
silversurfer83 (2026-01-20 19:49:23+00:00): Moin

du hast hier eine Aussichtsplattform auf einen Weg gesetzt, der laut OSM nicht betreten werden darf. Ausßerdem findet sich eine praktsich identische Plattform nur wenige Meter weiter SÖ in einem betretbaren Bereich.

Bist du dir sicher mit deiner Plattform? Und wenn ja, dann bitte nicht mitten auf den Weg setzen. 

Grüße
silversurfer83 (2026-01-19 19:45:53+00:00): Hi

ich wäre ja für short_name=*

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177400694
welzheimerwald (2026-01-20 01:29:42+00:00): Passt auch.
impiaaa (2026-01-20 22:13:32+00:00): Hello! Please use the changeset comment to describe what you changed and why. For example, "Added a missing corporate office that I discovered while visiting." You can find more examples and guidance here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Thanks!
dima monsky (2026-01-21 00:11:18+00:00): Thank You, impiaaa, i just started to contribute to osm, learning newbie. Changeset comment - You helped me howto use)
Entbert (2026-01-19 13:58:06+00:00): Quellvermerk: © GeoBasis-DE/LGLN 2026, Daten geändert
Taya_S (2026-01-20 10:49:02+00:00): Hi, I have reverted your edits. You added your house to a bus relation, added a date as housenumber, and included your personal name (Which will be redacted).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177469687
kingkingHK (2026-01-19 03:19:38+00:00): How so?
kingkingHK (2026-06-18 14:07:15+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184273391
Kovoschiz (2026-06-20 18:11:21+00:00): What's the difference with Kung Um Rd?
NeisBot (2026-01-19 07:27:00+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1468141389 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Private pool villas"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-27 06:39:28+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177749514
(No visible changes after review)
eggie (2026-01-19 07:47:44+00:00): Dag Bendinko,
Dit zal ook niet meer routeren voor bv bezorgdiensten die ook op OSM rijden,
Daarom is het vaak een afweging om toch de route op permissive te zetten.
Het is niet altijd zwartwit.

MVG
eggie
Bendinko (2026-01-19 08:49:41+00:00): Interessant! Het langere stuk gaat ver voorbij de woning en lijkt echt priveterrein, is het dan correcter om het bereikbare deel op permissive te zetten en een deel op private?
eggie (2026-01-19 08:53:35+00:00): Lijkt me een strak plan 😀
NeisBot (2026-01-19 07:27:01+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13465417228 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-27 06:39:28+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177749515
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-19 07:27:03+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13465441357 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Electrical contractor office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-27 06:39:28+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/177490924
rskedgell (2026-01-19 07:59:00+00:00): (Review requested)

The tagging looks fine to me.

There are some optional tags you could add to the road sections, dual_carriageway=yes + sidewalk:left=separate + sidewalk:right=no

With the zebra crossing, you could split the way where it crosses the central reservation, tagging it as footway=traffic_island . The two separate zebra crossings would then be crossing:island=no
NeisBot (2026-01-19 07:27:05+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/46389399 v8

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Boat rental dock"

#MapWithoutSpam
eggie (2026-01-19 07:43:45+00:00): Hi boatlocal,

Please look in the wiki how to tag a boat_ride.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:attraction%3Dboat_ride

Don't add the info at a random junction in A'dam, but at the precise location of the boat_ride.
I removed your contribution.
Greetz,
eggie
NeisBot (2026-01-19 07:27:06+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/46388842 v7

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dinner boat tour operator"

#MapWithoutSpam
eggie (2026-01-19 07:45:22+00:00): 

Hi boatlocal,

Please look in the wiki how to tag a boat_ride.
attraction=boat_ride

Don't add the info at a random junction in A'dam, but at the precise location of the boat_ride.
I removed your contribution.
Greetz,
eggie
NeisBot (2026-01-19 07:35:56+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 42 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1468149684 v1 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1468149698 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1468149696 v1 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177407902
NeisReview (2026-01-28 07:01:03+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177753528
FajrAl (2026-05-30 04:37:06+00:00): Gunakan tag bangunan, bukan penggunaan lahan,
rskedgell (2026-01-19 07:50:16+00:00): (Review requested)

If this is the location of your office, you might want to add a tag like office=company so that data consumers know what sort of feature this is. You could also add the address and other contact information.
NeisBot (2026-01-20 07:29:15+00:00): Hello AmalaPasham, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/13466182423

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177410354
eggie (2026-05-21 20:12:18+00:00): Beste C Batenburg. Zet nu eens svp geen motor_vehicle=no op paaltjes. Niet alle motor_vehicle is een auto. 
mope.. mofa... allemaal motorvoertuigen in OSM.
Ik heb het verwijderd.. Het zal anders niet routeren voor moped en mofa.

MVG
eggie
C Batenburg (2026-05-27 06:52:54+00:00): Hé Eggie, thanx voor de feedback, ik kan me niet herinneren dat ik dat bewust heb gedaan. Zover ik weet was het eerst een verwijderbaar paaltje maar heeft de gemeente er een vaste paal van gemaakt. Dat heb ik aangepast, maar ik zal beter checken of motor_vehicle goed staat
eggie (2026-05-27 07:03:10+00:00): Hoi.. yep.. motor_vehicle is een soort van default muv mope en mofa. Tag je het wel dan routeer het niet voor moped en mofa.
Groet,
eggie
Константин Гам (2026-01-22 13:07:46+00:00): Пожалуйста читайте ответы на вопросы. Реконструируемый обьект подписан на паспорте обьекта, не вносите свои фантазии в карту.
dpolovinkin (2026-01-22 13:19:39+00:00): Раз уж вы паспорт цитируете, вы бы его хотя бы нормально прочитали чтоб глупо не выглядеть с такими комментами про фантазии :)) 

НАИМЕНОВАНИЕ ОБЪЕКТА: «РЕКОНСТРУКЦИЯ ПРОДОЛЖЕНИЯ
ВАРШАВСКОЙ УЛ. (ПАРФЁНОВСКАЯ УЛ.) ОТ МАЛОЙ МИТРОФАНЬЕВСКОИ УЛ.
ДО ТАШКЕНТСКОЙ УЛ. 1-Й ЭТАП СТРОИТЕЛЬСТВА.»
Константин Гам (2026-01-22 14:29:26+00:00): Где ж тут глупости? Слабо внести название более приближенное к паспорту?
dpolovinkin (2026-01-23 15:13:07+00:00): Ну а чего про фантазии писать когда реально это Парфеновская там.. что ее реконструкция - вот в общем то и приближенное к паспорту, ну или вообще все название с паспорта туда запиндюривать, не знаю несколько это нужно)
Константин Гам (2026-01-23 15:43:50+00:00): Я написал название с таблички до определенного слова. А парфеновская в скобках не просто так, см генплан
dpolovinkin (2026-01-28 18:07:58+00:00): слушайте)) я понимаю что вы придумываете что бы такое написать чтоб постараться сохранить лицо после того как поставили неправильное название стройке, а потом его защищали аргументируя паспортом объекта заблуждаясь о том что на нем написано, так еще и с наездами типо "фантазии" и "слабо", но вот плз не надо выдумки про "до определенного слова", табличка тупо не начинается с "реконструкция варшавской" что вы туда поставили)

а так чего глобально то такого, не так увидели норм название, все тут ошибаются иногда (хотя некоторые ошибаются чаще даже судя кол-ву блоков...) - но зачем вот это все разводить тут непонятное вместо норм диалога

и еще раз:
- в OSM на улице тут буквально написано что строится "Парфеновская"
- Варшавской тут рядом нигде нет
- и я вам буквально как человек живущий тут на районе говорю, что это именно стоится Парфеновская и все кто тут живет так же это знает

поэтому щас вот вы поставили уже название +- по паспорту, вот и хорошо теперь) спасибо!)
eggie (2026-01-19 08:13:56+00:00): Comment  .. removed boat_ride from junction
NeisBot (2026-01-20 07:40:08+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/7644851559 v7

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Car repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 07:00:56+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177791692
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-20 07:30:30+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 27 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/186359820 v11 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/186359894 v4 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/186359819 v14 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1970364748 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177411121
NeisReview (2026-01-28 07:01:03+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177608226
NeisBot (2026-01-20 07:40:10+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/968558465 v9

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Window film store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-28 07:00:56+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/177491024
GerdP (2026-01-19 15:36:01+00:00): Copy+paste Fehler: Radtour war am 18.1.2026
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-01-19 09:24:03+00:00): Merhaba. Daha önce aynı yere bu işletmeyi eklemiştiniz. Geçmişte açtığınız üç hesabınız seo spam sebebiyle engellendi, bir hesabınızı da sanırım siz sildiniz. Amacınız SEO spamı değilse OpenStreetMap'te gerçekten değiştirmek istediğiniz, katkı sağlamak istediğiniz bir husus varsa ve ekleyemiyorsanız buraya yorum yazarsanız yardımcı olmaya çalışayım. Yok eğer amacınız sadece SEO ise lütfen art niyetli değişiklikler yapmayınız. 

İşletmenizin Facebook, Instagram gibi platformlarda görünmesi için yapıyorsanız OpenStreetMap'in bu sosyal medya platformları ile bir bağı yok. Burası, herkesin katkısına açık, bağımsız bir coğrafi veri tabanı. O tip platformlarda işletmeniz görünmüyorsa onlarla iletişime geçmeniz gerekli. Burada işletmeniz zaten ekli. OpenStreetMap'te yapılabilecek daha fazla bir şey yok.

İyi günler.
NeisBot (2026-01-20 07:40:13+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11696304204 v6

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Car detailing shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 07:00:57+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177791693
(No visible changes after review)
Jacksonville (2026-02-03 22:43:37+00:00): Asalamualikum,

Please note that Secondary Roads are those highways which link towns or cities to each other, or link several areas of a city. Tertiary Roads those highways which are used as normal main roads or those roads which link villages together.
Jacksonville (2026-02-03 22:43:43+00:00): Shukriya.
Jacksonville (2026-02-03 22:44:50+00:00): Primary Roads are those roads which link cities (or big towns) to each other.
Hb- (2026-01-19 21:03:40+00:00): Hello, unfortunately I had to overwrite your edits with the changeset/177448548  
Also the "Pass" is seen as 20 km long pass road between the Mitla-Pass height on the West node/7045813933 and the "Al Khitan-Pass?" on the East node/11218555428 
Please feel free to add the arabic  name to this pass height. Please also check the en and de names for this pass, because I only used a machine translated name from Hebrew.
geagea (2026-01-19 23:16:52+00:00): Well, link was added to Wikidata - https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1939722#P10689 . In Arabic it's ممر متلا . This was the site of a famous battle in 1956 - Battle of the Mitla Pass
Hb- (2026-01-20 12:55:17+00:00): Please check again the wikidata content. The 1967 battle was on the west side of the pass. Where exactly was the 1956 battle? Was he really stretched over 32 km?

The way/1220183407 is the old way with a slope. Some years ago the new motorway was build and a several hills were removed.
geagea (2026-01-20 19:15:56+00:00): The battle took place in Mitla pass and Al Khitan pass
https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/קרב_המיתלה during https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suez_Crisis . According to the article in Hebrew the coordinate location was 30°2'43.159"N, 33°0'40.208"E .
Sylabowy Kot (2026-01-19 17:34:42+00:00): Please, no. Limit your changes per some local area. Do not make some random things around the world. 
It's too mixed changeset.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

One more time and you'll be warned/banned by a moderator.
Rival8347U (2026-01-20 01:33:58+00:00): Sorry, I will not do it again.
OSM-Contributer (2026-01-19 16:37:39+00:00): One edit in Netherlands and one in Australia. I know that you probably did it in one sitting but try to make 2 changeset for the thing you have done. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset for more information
silversurfer83 (2026-01-19 19:52:05+00:00): Hi there

I believe that highway=residential is maybe not the right choice here. Looks more like highway=service or unclassified or track

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177412444
Rival8347U (2026-01-20 01:31:07+00:00): K, got it, I will do 2 changesets next time
Rival8347U (2026-01-20 01:51:59+00:00): and put the right road types
GerdP (2026-01-19 15:36:11+00:00): Copy+paste Fehler: Radtour war am 18.1.2026
NeisBot (2026-01-20 07:40:15+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13466588724 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Indoor golf club"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 07:00:57+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177791694
(No visible changes after review)