piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2025-02-22 21:09:34+00:00): reverted by changeset #162831721
eggie (2025-02-22 21:08:10+00:00): reverted by changeset #162831695
eggie (2025-02-22 21:07:10+00:00): reverted by changeset #162831656
overscoper (2025-02-23 04:58:35+00:00): Broken import because of conflicts, finished in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162829402
eggie (2025-02-22 21:06:40+00:00): reverted by changeset      #162831626
eggie (2025-02-22 20:05:55+00:00): Dag Jacob,

Je legt hier vlakken bouwland op vlakken bouwland. Dat geeft foutmeldingen. 
Waar komen deze namen vandaan?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-22 21:04:40+00:00): reverted by changeset #162831607
dypa (2025-03-01 10:38:06+00:00): При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra

Пожалуйста при внесении следующих правок используйте теги (Размеченный (нерегулируемый) пешеходный переход)
crossing=uncontrolled
crossing:markings=zebra

Заранее спасибо!
stasiu512 (2025-02-22 20:20:41+00:00): Zrobiliśmy taką samą edycje w tym samym momecnie;) zostawiłem twoje bo nie wiedziałem co zmieniasz a moje to tylko dodanie trolleybus=yes. Mamy wyczucie!
Marek-M (2025-02-22 20:40:23+00:00): 👋 Dzięki - jak chcesz mieć swój wkład w taką edycję, to te przystanki w centrum na północy Gdyni są jeszcze nie poprawione :)
Marek-M (2025-02-22 20:41:13+00:00): *w centrum _i_ na północy Gdyni*
stasiu512 (2025-02-22 20:42:59+00:00): Właśnie przy tworzeniu wspomnianej edycji zająłem się też nimi :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162830408#map=12/54.4956/18.3963
Marek-M (2025-02-22 20:59:16+00:00): Dzięki :) 👋
geisthugo123 (2025-03-17 22:06:31+00:00): Ja passt soweit, danke für den Eintrag
flyingember (2025-02-23 14:49:44+00:00): Sidewalks are not only alongside streets.  Sidewalks are how someone reaches a property from the street

Foot paths are paths that are used to stay within a property.
silversurfer83 (2025-02-22 21:01:19+00:00): Da ist mir JOSM beinahe abgeschmiert. Daher hier mein CS-Kommentar:

Marsberg: Wege, Gebäude, Adressen, Landuse nach Luftbild und Kataster NRW
Frans S (2025-02-23 09:22:08+00:00): Hello Doug. Thanks for mapping here. 
I Noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome.
I am reviewing (new) mappers work to check that they in alignment with the instructions and mapping standards.
A few remarks.
A single building is just mapped as a place=isolated building which you tagged correctly. No need to add a tag marking it as a residential area. A residential area is to be used at a group of buildings, Hamlet. Village, Tonwn (depending on the size.)

About mapping Hedges.
Never connect nodes of hedges to highways. Just stop close to it. GPS nav systems cannot deal with these objects connected to a road.
In general, Never connect nodes of a building, wall, hedges etc to a road.
Where a road crosse a hedge, just make a gap on that spot. (reason, see previous line)
Where a road is lined (parallel) with a hedge, just draw the hedge close to it, without touching the road.
Sometimes difficult to decide what an object is what you observe. Here, you marked, as far I can recognize them, rocks as being a settlement. After gaining experience, it becomes clear to recognize objects.
I will correct the issues.
Best regards and keep mapping
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-22 21:20:45+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12610582330
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317138136

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Nar_ach (2025-04-24 11:10:09+00:00): Hello Laura Mugeha
Thank You for your contribution.
Make sure to use imagery sources mentioned in a project - while quality checking I found incorrectly created buildings, for example ways: 1361251713, 1362928697, 1361742066, 1362044332. Happy Mapping!
marc__marc (2025-04-07 23:29:04+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour ces améliorations.
as-tu la possibilité de vérifier si la capacité a été ou pas augmentée ? l'opendata parle de 4 places (4 type 2 et type e)
Cordialement,
Marc
tonio4open (2025-04-08 22:14:47+00:00): J'ai fait un stop là "urgence vomi" sur la route des vacances, donc non, pas possible d'y retourner.
DD1GJ (2025-02-23 07:04:14+00:00): Revert. Chaos durch verschobene Punkte, siehe https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162832214
lyctkel (2025-03-04 16:17:52+00:00): Hi SimonKlemmt,
danke für das Eintragen der Glasfarben.
Ich habe mir die Freiheit genommen, sie mit einem ";" statt mit einem "/" zu trennen :-)
Dies wurde diskutiert, ist aber schwer zu finden ...
Siehe auch: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rfc-tagging-glass-recycling/101011/32
Herzliche Grüße aus den Niederlanden,
lyctkel
DD1GJ (2025-02-23 07:06:59+00:00): verpönte Werbeprosa entfernt.
PierZen (2025-02-22 23:08:57+00:00): nom - c'est il me semble l'Établissement Archambault qui comprend trois prisons
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89tablissement_Archambault
jb54osm (2025-02-22 22:14:32+00:00): 👍
b-jazz (2025-02-23 19:06:45+00:00): Hi Bobby,

Thanks for helping the OSM community improve golf course mapping. There's a small problem with how you mapped the first hole (and possibly others) that I wanted to let you know about so that you change how you do it in the future.

The way that it was before is super-wrong, so I'm glad you're working on improving it. The fairway had been marked in such a way that it intersected the green and partially overlapped it. What you did was made the fairway go all the way around the green and you reused the nodes of the green. The problem with what you did is that it isn't topologically correct. There are two ways to handle the green. The first is that, if you can see it in satellite imagery, leave room between the fairway and green. This is called the "fringe" and isn't always obvious from imagery. And when the fairway fully surrounds the green, it should be turned into a multipolygon. The second way is to make the fairway butt up against the green by sharing nodes between them, but exclude the area of the green instead of surrounding it.

This is a wiki page that describes how to do the above: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course

Let me know if you have any questions.
Frans S (2025-02-24 10:14:39+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. We welcome you as a new mapper.
A few remarks.
Never connect nodes of roads and hedges to other objects (like buildings)|
Where a road crosses a hedge, just leave a gap in the hedge.
Mapping isolated dwellings, hamlets etc., as well as residential areas is also required.
I added them.
Best regards and keep mapping
andyman1 (2025-02-22 22:45:24+00:00): Note: JOSM using MapwithAI using "United States Addresses" flagged a mismatch of the correct "Siena" (one N) and "Lode Stone" (not Lodes Star or Lodestone) street name. I corrected the street name and uploaded the house address tags to fix this. 
You can confirm Siena/Lode Stone is correct with the Douglas County Assessor property search: https://apps.douglas.co.us/assessor/web/#/
here's a pdf of that area:
https://apps.douglas.co.us/realware/SectionMaps/TWP2233/DC_2233_17.pdf
Mapquest and Apple Maps have the right name. Google has "Siena" correct but incorrect "Lodestone". Street View will show the street signs with correct name.
andyman1 (2025-02-22 22:53:04+00:00): Also, not sure if anything should be done with the "tiger" tags on the streets, which are also wrong?
habi (2025-02-24 10:53:24+00:00): Ciao Outdoorrookie

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Im Kanton Bern haben wir Zugriff auf die offiziellen Gebäudeumrisse, die aus dem Katasterplan abgeleitet werden.
Du kannst diese beim Editieren einschalten, wenn du rechts imKartendaten-Menu ganz unten einen Haken setzts: https://pasteimg.com/image/screenshot-from-2025-02-24-11-50-25.nBjcf
Das hilft dir beim 'genauen' Erfassen der Gebäudeumrisse.

E Gruess us Bärn,
habi
Geo-Tobi (2025-02-23 06:05:43+00:00): Da fällt mir auf: das VzTool sagt: 
maxweight:conditional=none @ (destination)
Du hast getagged
maxweight:conditional=no @ (destination)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239018526
Absicht? Ich bin mir jetzt auch nicht sicher und VzTool ist keine ultimative Referenz. Möchte nur drauf hinweisen.
felipeeugenio (2025-02-23 13:37:04+00:00): Hola. No entiendo mucho varias de las ediciones. Usted mis agregó numeraciones que ahora borra. No existen?
Por otro lado, por favor dejar pegados usos de suelo que van pegados. Estoy en eso ahora yo. Dejó todo como un mosaico.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162834549
James2813 (2025-02-23 14:23:03+00:00): Hola. Primero, disculpe por los usos de suelos. Sinceramente pensé que se separaban levemente porque (aparte de los cerros) eso fue lo que vi. A partir de ahora los dejaré pegados. Segundo, las numeraciones eran números de parcela entregados por los condominios. "Existen" pero todavía no se ha edificado nada en la mayoría. Por eso, como dice la wiki, dejé solamente urbanas las parcelaciones efectivamente construidas o usadas. Muchos loteos aparecían completamente urbanizados cuando era una fracción pequeña o incluso mínima la que se había construido. Por eso lo cambié. Saludos
felipeeugenio (2025-02-23 14:27:13+00:00): Hola. Gracias por la respuesta. No siempre van pegados, pero la mayoría si.
Y claro, ahora que veo toda la comuna está con ese ejemplo que te llevó a pensar que así se hacía.

saludos
andyman1 (2025-02-22 23:21:15+00:00): Note: JOSM using MapwithAI using "United States Addresses" caught a mismatch of street names. Old/bad "Sand Pebble" vs new/correct "Sandpebble" and old/bad "Rockrose" vs new/correct "Rock Rose". I corrected the street name and uploaded the house address tags to fix this.
You can confirm Sandpebble/Rock Rose is correct with the Douglas County Assessor office property search: https://apps.douglas.co.us/assessor/web/#/
here's a pdf of that area:
https://apps.douglas.co.us/realware/SectionMaps/TWP2233/DC_2233_17.pdf
Mapquest and Apple Maps have the right name. Google has "Sandpebble" correct but incorrect "Rockrose". Street View will show the street signs with correct name.

Also, not sure what to do with the incorrect "tiger" tags on those streets?
大山かなめ (2025-02-23 12:22:37+00:00): ウェイ: 1362058501をはじめ、いくつかの建物は2024年2月の時点で解体または建て替えられているようです
sourceタグを見る限りEsri以外の写真を使っているようですが、この地域（坂戸市や近隣市町村）ではEsriが一番新しい画像ですので
古い建物を誤って描くのを防ぐために照らし合わせることをお勧めします
大山かなめ (2025-02-23 12:28:05+00:00): 画質や角度の関係で、建物をトレースするメインの画像にEsriを用いることが難しいのは承知（実際に自分も形はBingベースにしています）なのですが
「その建物がなくなっていないか」の確認用として併用していただけると助かります
monotar (2025-07-26 13:44:19+00:00): bitte sowas das nächste Mal vor Ort nachschauen - sowas sieht man nicht im Luftbild!
archie (2025-02-23 00:00:28+00:00): Well you introduced a nice imagery offset by this "precising roads". If you take a look at the history, you will notice that those highways were inserted with NVDB as source. Much better source as your non-justified Bing Maps background.  Really, what is the purpose of offsetting those roads? They were rather good placed before your edit.
archie (2025-02-23 00:13:17+00:00): I took mesure. Your introduced offset is between 6 - 9 meters. The same for the wrongly moved highwas as the newly inserted buildings.
tastrax (2025-02-23 06:44:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for these edits but there are a couple of issues. Firstly, when adding something its important to put a clear changeset comment that is meaningful so other mappers know what you have added, "My map edits" doesnt really give us much indication. The second is 'naming ' all these fields. Unless there are signs on all these paddocks indicating their names then you should use ref=field 10" etc for a local reference to each field.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

There are also some good tips on Australian tagging at this wiki page.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines

Cheers and happy mapping - Phil
tastrax (2025-02-23 07:16:43+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-22 23:51:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2290751318
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2290748843
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1020671312
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1020671443

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mueschel (2025-02-23 15:34:55+00:00): Hi,
it seems there is a mistake in the wiki.
The source tag should be 
source:quiet_hours  - "source" is almost always used as a prefix.
This is also as mentioned in the text in the Wiki, but the example below shows a wrong tag.
Could you check & edit the POIs?
user_5359 (2025-02-23 15:37:54+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/131673353. what is the mean of the tag sorefurce = 20 (could be surface or maxspeed)
empty_child (2025-02-23 11:09:41+00:00): Hello VlIvYur,
Unfortunately, Yandex forbid to use their panoramas outside Russia for OSM community
VlIvYur (2025-02-28 21:48:22+00:00): Hello
Can you share where they stated that they forbid it?
empty_child (2025-03-01 08:04:56+00:00): I can send you the conversation with their support service, but not here (not convenient). If you are a member of OSM AM telegram chat, I can send there
VlIvYur (2025-03-01 16:57:47+00:00): Sure, I have the same nickname there
unh_ (2025-02-26 01:02:49+00:00): #btcmap
vasony (2025-02-23 11:35:44+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
vasony (2025-02-23 11:42:08+00:00): Visszavontam a módosításaidat, random fasorokat hoztál létre, fuss neki még egyszer kisebb léptékben rendes leírással.
RedAuburn (2025-02-23 00:27:28+00:00): see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4637172
user_5359 (2025-02-23 15:32:52+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1362067227. What is the mean of the tag panaramax = 1636881a-b883-4288-89f2-dfcdd8174d21?
Cayenne17 (2025-02-23 15:41:59+00:00): Hello,
thank you for pointing out the error.
I've just corrected the typo on the panaramax key. It's panoramax instead.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162857622
Henry572 (2025-03-01 18:08:17+00:00): Hallo adjuva,
Ist es gewollt, dass https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1362074456 jetzt als highway=service eingetragen ist? Es sah auf den ersten Blick komisch aus, aber vielleicht ist da ja eine längerfristige Baustelle...
Gruß, Hendrik
b-jazz (2025-02-24 05:57:10+00:00): Thanks for the contributions Ratelimiter. FYI, greens that don't have specific names (very rare) shouldn't have "#2 Green" added to them. The name should be left unset. You can put "ref=2" on the feature, but if there is already the straight line golf "hole" with proper "ref" tagging, putting one on the green is redundant. Thanks.
Ratelimiter (2025-02-25 01:03:35+00:00): No problem! I'll update it next time I get to mapping out the course. Currently learning how to use osm, mainly to be able to piece it together with lidar and re-create the course digitally in simulators. There's still more work I want to refine for this course before I call it complete.
b-jazz (2025-02-25 01:13:15+00:00): Very cool. We always appreciate good golf course mapping. Be sure and read the wiki to find other great tips on mapping courses: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course
b-jazz (2025-02-24 05:44:45+00:00): Hey there mbuenger,

Please see the OSM wiki on mapping golf courses. You shouldn't have fairways and green intersecting or partially overlapping each other. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls

Thanks.
MxxCon (2025-02-24 03:56:20+00:00): Hello.
Please note that this is not a proper way to tag a business as closed.
You should use lifecycle prefix as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162836497
MxxCon (2025-02-24 03:59:56+00:00): Hello.
Please use more descriptive changeset comments. "Fixed" doesn't help other mappers understand what you are editing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162836584
MxxCon (2025-02-24 04:00:33+00:00): Hello.
Please use more descriptive changeset comments. "Fixed" doesn't help other mappers understand what you are editing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162836600
MxxCon (2025-02-24 04:01:40+00:00): Hello.
Please use more descriptive changeset comments. "Fixed" doesn't help other mappers understand what you are editing.
Additionally, if you want to tag a business as closed, you should follow the lifecycle prefixes guideline as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162836612
MxxCon (2025-02-24 04:03:40+00:00): Hello.
Please use more descriptive changeset comments. "Fixed" doesn't help other mappers understand what you are editing.
Why did you delete the 3 address nodes?
You changed restaurant's name but kept its business hours the same. Is that accurate?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162836626
RedAuburn (2025-02-23 01:19:45+00:00): src https://stores.sainsburys.co.uk/0740/upton
MxxCon (2025-02-24 04:04:26+00:00): Hello.
Please use more descriptive changeset comments. "Fixed" doesn't help other mappers understand what you are editing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162836664
fortera_au (2025-02-23 04:26:11+00:00): Hi, descriptive names shouldn't be used on OSM, "Toilet and shower", you can indicate that it includes a shower using shower=yes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162837751
Jim8Knopf (2025-02-23 04:38:01+00:00): Hey Thanks for your advise. Just one question. How can I change my change request? Manny thanks in advance.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162837751
fortera_au (2025-02-23 04:43:14+00:00): You'd just make a new one with the changes, however in this case I've done it already :)
Jim8Knopf (2025-02-23 04:58:52+00:00): ❤️ Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162837751
andyman1 (2025-02-23 04:18:55+00:00): According to JOSM MapWithAI US Addresses data source, This should be "Martingale Drive", not divided into "East" and "West". I've updated the road names and house addresses around it
Double checked source with Douglas County Assessor's website: https://apps.douglas.co.us/assessor/web/#/ and specifically this pdf: https://apps.douglas.co.us/realware/SectionMaps/TWP2233/DC_2233_20.pdf
That's also how Apple Maps, Mapquest, and Google Maps have it. Can also confirm with street signs.

More specifically i'm unsure if or how to combine the two road segments with that roundabout splitting them.

Also there are some "tiger" tags on the streets and not sure if i should remove or fix those.
Frank Peng (2026-01-22 15:44:42+00:00): Please don't delete existing sidewalks, pedestrian crossings, and kerbs, and redraw them anew. Please just use the existing map elements and modify them. In this changeset, you deleted a few sidewalks and pedestrian crossings, and redrew them anew. You could've modified the geometry or refined the alignment of the existing sidewalks and pedestrian crossings you deleted in this changeset, and you could've started mapping the new sidewalks at the ends of the existing sidewalks. Please follow good practice on OSM by modifying existing map elements such as buildings, landuses, roads, sidewalks etc. instead of deleting them and redrawing them anew.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Please also don't remove or delete map elements you don't need or don't like.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_objects_that_you_don't_need_or_like
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162838587
Frank Peng (2026-01-22 15:50:07+00:00): Please click on the OSMCha link of this changeset to see this changeset's map edits and find the existing sidewalks and pedestrian crossings you deleted in this changeset. You may have to login to OSMCha with your OpenStreetMap account to access OSMCha.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162838587
Frank Peng (2026-01-22 16:45:03+00:00): Please click on the OSMCha link of this changeset at the bottom of this comment to see this changeset's map edits and find the existing sidewalks and pedestrian crossings you deleted in this changeset. You may have to login to OSMCha with your OpenStreetMap account to access OSMCha.
https://osmcha.org/changesets/162838587
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162838587
mapfixxer (2025-03-03 17:34:06+00:00): Why are you changing this back? These streets are 30 km/h most of the year aside form a few weeks for frogs. Using incorrect / temporary information has actual consequences (e.g. car insurance apps with tracking).
mapfixxer (2025-03-03 17:34:49+00:00): And those photos from Mapillary are completely outdated.
StefanHRT (2025-03-03 18:09:25+00:00): Hello,
I am not aware of any cancellation of the signage there (and neither is a friend of mine from the BBBike app) and the photos from https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4151965 are not yet a year old. You are welcome to provide current photos that prove that there are no more 10 km/h signs there, alternatively I will check myself in the days to see if the signs have really been removed. If the signs are still there, the 10km/h applies all year round unless there should be an addition for a time restriction in the meantime.
StefanHRT (2025-03-08 06:56:57+00:00): actually photos from today (08.03.2025) with 10Km/h https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/stefanhrt?lat=52.52705279999998&lng=13.60930559999997&z=17&menu=false&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&focus=map&panos=true&pKey=982225323870009
eserte (2025-06-09 11:01:37+00:00): 10km/h vs 30km/h in den letzten Jahren:

* Mapillary April 2020:                10km/h-Schilder
* Mapillary September 2020:            keine 10km/h-Schilder
* Mapillary Dezember 2020:             keine 10km/h-Schilder
* Mapillary 10. April 2022:            10km/h-Schilder
* GoogleMaps angeblich September 2022: keine 10km/h-Schilder
* Apple angeblich April 2023:          10km/h-Schilder
* Mapillary 8. März 2025:              10km/h-Schilder
* Mapillary 2. April 2025:             10km/h-Schilder
* (ohne Bild) 9. Juni 2025:            keine 10km/h-Schilder

Vielleicht kann man für nächstes Jahr Beginn (Februar? März?) und Ende (Mai? Juni?) der 10km/h-Regelung in Erfahrung bringen...
Frank Peng (2026-01-22 16:09:23+00:00): This changeset's comment should prabably say "Added pedestrian crossings on Peppers Ferry Road" since you mapped pedestrian crossings in this changeset.

Looking at this changeset's comment, Peppers Ferry Road is spelled without an apostrophe. There's no apostrophe in the street name. So instead of "Pepper's Ferry Road", it's spelled "Peppers Ferry Road" with no apostrophe.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162838635