piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Adrian Shobrooke (2025-05-25 19:06:38+00:00): No problem. I had started doing the same, then noticed I had drifted outside. Not sure of the protocol in such a situation. I'm not aware of an adjoining project underway.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-30 06:03:01+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166953369
eggie (2025-05-12 20:04:05+00:00): Hoi.. Je hebt shop=supermarket laten staan.
Ik dek dat je beter alle bedrijfsinfo kunt verwijderen. Nu geeft het verwarring.
.. shop=vacant zou je kunne taggen.
Mvg
eggie
Gendov (2025-05-12 20:37:32+00:00): Dank voor de feedback. Supermarkt is weg, pand staat leeg. Uit deze post https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/hoe-om-te-gaan-met-leegstaande-winkels/70924/3 maak ik op dat disused  de juiste tag is voor dit geval? Met het verwijderen van de bedrijfsgegevens ben ik er dan geloof ik.
eggie (2025-05-12 20:42:30+00:00): Yep... zo zie je in ieder geval geen supermarktsymbool meer. 👍
jaap de vries (2025-05-13 06:37:00+00:00): Zijn de parkeerplaatsen privé of openbaar of alleen voor vergunninghouders?
aceman444 (2025-05-16 08:52:44+00:00): Zdravim, dakujem za opravy budov. Pri tomto type prace by ale bolo vhodne porovnavat aj s katastrom (ZBGIS), nie len Ortofotomozaikou. Napr. na tejto budove bol povodny obrys z katastra, ale aj Vas novy existuje v katastri, ale ste ho nepouzili a zakreslili ste podla Ortofoto zbytocne nepresne. Je to skoda, ked je cela budova pekne z katastra (source kapor2 alebo ZBGIS), ale cast z nej je nepresne podla Ortofoto. Dakujem
ticho2 (2025-05-16 14:52:18+00:00): Ahoj, so ZBGIS zatial viem pracovat len tak, ze si ho otvorim vedla v okne, ale nejak programaticky z neho importovat tvary ci ine data, to nezvladam. Vdaka teda za upresnenie tvaru podla ZBGIS, aj ked si myslim ze moja uprava nebola az tak daleko od skutocneho stavu. :)
aceman444 (2025-08-20 21:28:57+00:00): Automaticky importovat z katastra neviem ani ja (plugin do JOSM uz tusim nefunguje). Da sa importovat z inych zdrojov budov, ale tam tiez nie som spokojny s presnostou.

Minimalne sa vsak da podlozit ako vrstva a obkreslovat rucne priamo v JOSM, zrejme aj v iD. Ak tam taku vrstvu nevidite, poslem Vam adresu.
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 16:32:45+00:00): reverted the vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166265834
silversurfer83 (2025-05-12 20:21:17+00:00): Vielen Dank.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166170762
citrula (2025-05-13 06:56:05+00:00): I reverted this edit because it looks like you replaced an entirely different business with your own. Please do the built-in tutorial and try again

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166186011
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-12 18:44:12+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4109415493/history has rooms = 0 that was added in this edit
What was meant by this? That this object has no rooms? Seems surprising here
habi (2025-10-13 15:21:17+00:00): Ciao stillhart
Ich fuhr letzte Woche (mit dem Velo) hier durch und habe Ladestationen hier angeschaut.
Ich finde, dass *keine* der `man_made=charge_point`s hier Address-Tags bekommen sollte, denn die Dinger haben ziemlich sicher keine (postalische) Addresse.
Die Adresse gehört nämlich laut GWR zum Migrolino-Gebäude.
Fingsch OK wenn ich die Adresse dort hinzufüge und bei den Ladestationen entferne?
Gruss,
habi
habi (2025-10-13 15:31:50+00:00): Adresse auf Migrolino-Gebäude hier hinzugefügt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173233945
stillhart (2025-10-14 09:01:49+00:00): Ja!
habi (2025-10-14 18:25:32+00:00): In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173289272 gemacht.
flohoff (2025-05-14 16:17:17+00:00): Moin,
bitte hier nicht weiter editieren - Das ist alles Bullshit - Da sind diverse mapper mit Blindem Aktionismus wegen der Wochennotiz kommentares losgerannt. 

Das hat aber nichts mit OSM zu tun - Die Frau hat sich über "Falk" beschwert und das sind HERE Daten.

In OSM war das immer schon halbwegs richtig und hier ist auch ein Note der das Tracked.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4754800

Es gibt eine aktive Community vor Ort und ein Note wäre besser gewesen.

Oben der Maiweg ist eh partiell gesperrt - also geht da eh kein Durchgangsverkehr.

Flo
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 16:49:34+00:00): reverted the vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166266621
rskedgell (2025-05-12 22:02:06+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for updating this.

If these are privately owned roads, you could also add the tag ownership=private. It's not essential and you can feel free to ignore this comment, but it would help to reinforce the reason for the permissive access and 25 mph speed limit.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:ownership%3Dprivate
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-12 21:20:54+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Bobrowniki":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12832439499
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12832439500
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190866280
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190866283
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190866284
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1348587937
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385968110
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385968111
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385968112

"Kapituła":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1348587930

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Rhodez (2025-05-13 13:58:48+00:00): [Sudbury, ON/Verner, ON] updating area**
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 20:33:46+00:00): Reverted spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166276276
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2025-05-13 08:40:45+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for your changes!

Consider uploading your changes before travelling long distances: this ensures that changesets are local and helps us review data!

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
ieuanj (2025-05-13 08:51:00+00:00): Ah apologies.  I was using the StreetComplete tool and hadn't realised it would upload them in a single changeset.  Will bear in mind in future. Thanks!
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2025-05-13 09:02:25+00:00): No worries ☺

Have a nice day!
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 20:22:33+00:00): Reverted spam by Luischoez21

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166275876
rskedgell (2025-05-12 22:29:19+00:00): (Review requested)

The deleted "pavement" was a separately mapped cycleway, originally added from DfT data in 2013.

In general, deleting another mapper's work should only really be done if the feature doesn't exist, or no longer exists. However, from the Bing aerial and street side imagery, it looks like the asphalt pavement on the W side was incorrectly added as a separate cycle track. This should have been the explicitly shared pavement/cycle track paved with red bricks on the E side. I would be inclined to map the E side as a separate way, as it joins Chadwick Road at a different point to the carriageway of George Raymond Road and is clearly a continuation of the shared cycle track through Pirelli Park.

If you don't want to do that, the segment of George Raymond Road between Chadwick Road and Pirelli Park should be tagged with:

cycleway:left=track
cycleway:left:oneway=no
cycleway:right=no
sidewalk:left:surface=paving_stones
sidewalk:right:surface=asphalt

https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=50.967263%7E-1.363876&lvl=20.3&mo=om.1&pi=-12.6&style=x&dir=10.3
-redacted- (2025-05-12 22:42:07+00:00): Thanks, I'm new to OSM so this is why I requested a review. I agree with your suggestion of keeping it but moving it to the other side, do you know the simplest way of reverting my change so I can move it?
rskedgell (2025-05-13 06:35:47+00:00): No problem, hopefully the above was helpful.

There is a reverter plugin which you can add to the JOSM editor you're using - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter
I've reverted this one in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166185155
-redacted- (2025-05-13 12:34:45+00:00): Thanks, I have moved the cyclepath to the correct side in in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166200491
Frank Peng (2026-01-24 02:01:43+00:00): Instead of deleting existing map elements and redrawing them from scratch, it's good practice to modify the geometry of the existing map elements. You deleted an existing fairway and redrew it in this changeset. Please modify the geometry of existing golf features instead of deleting them and redrawing them anew.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166174708
JJIglesias (2025-05-14 17:07:30+00:00): Las vías llevan por delante de su nombre propio las descripciones Calle, Avenida, Pasaje, Pasillo, etc.

Gracias
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 17:31:14+00:00): reverted the spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166268605
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 17:46:55+00:00): reverted the spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166269363
aussiegeek (2025-05-12 22:56:48+00:00): Both the foot/cycle paths parallel to palmers rd had bridge & layer=1 tags, but skeleton creek also has a bridge tag, so set it to layer=1 and bridge above to layer=2
aharvey (2025-05-13 00:05:56+00:00): Looks good.
pwbriggs (2025-05-13 07:12:03+00:00): Confirmed based on Bing Streetside imagery. Thanks for the contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Glassman (2025-05-14 16:43:26+00:00): As pwbriggs said, thanks for correcting the street name. Could you also rename the bridge over the creek also? The county's imap isn't very specific as to where the name changes to 132nd Avenue Southeast. Can you verify where it changes?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166176219
riwnodennyk (2025-05-13 15:57:35+00:00): Ця дорога не існує, там будівництво паркінгу. Припиняй вандалізм
KKS (2025-05-13 20:24:39+00:00): Ти розумієш різницю між track та footway?
KKS (2025-05-16 21:00:21+00:00): Вчора бачив як телепортнутний екскватор їхав по телепортнутій неіснуючій дорозі. Видно копав не існуючий грунт, для не існуючого будівництва @riwnodennyk
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 16:15:03+00:00): reverted the vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166265023
Xvtn (2025-05-31 01:30:48+00:00): For this sled hill, you may consider piste:name or loc_name. But as the local mapper you have final say I think. :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 15:02:50+00:00): revert test edit with bogus "inun" names

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166261913
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 16:15:04+00:00): reverted the vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166265023
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 15:02:21+00:00): revert test edit with bogus "inun" names

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166261894
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-13 18:17:56+00:00): what you tried to achieve in this edit?
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 16:15:05+00:00): reverted the vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166265023
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 16:11:57+00:00): reverted the vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166264922
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 20:52:01+00:00): Reverted spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166276786
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 17:27:07+00:00): reverted the vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166268384
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 20:54:58+00:00): Reverted spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166276884
Minh Nguyen (2025-12-03 22:08:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444208347 is a segment of a river, not a flowline that only exists for theoretical purposes in OSM. For example, Mobridge is on Lake Oahe but it’s also on the Missouri River.
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 20:43:11+00:00): Reverted spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166276532
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 07:21:43+00:00): Why you changed name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196946154/history ?
TausifJutt (2025-05-17 16:47:58+00:00): Hello sir, tell me the reasons for changing this road and have you ever been here in Kololi Tarar and have you seen this road with your own eyes? If you have, then no one can change it. There are no stupid and crazy people living here. You are the only one who is not wise in Pakistan. Tell me the reasons for this change.
TausifJutt (2025-05-17 17:05:50+00:00): Hello sir, (RLakhani ) tell me the reasons for changing this road and have you ever been here in Kolo Tarar-Hafizabad Road and have you seen this road with your own eyes? If you have, then no one can change it. There are no stupid and crazy people living here. You are the only one who is not wise in Pakistan. Tell me the reasons for this change
FroschForscher (2025-05-13 15:05:37+00:00): Hallo kbre,
bist du dir sicher das das hier "Neubau" heißt und nicht nur ein Neubau ist?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name

FroschForscher
kbre (2025-05-13 18:23:07+00:00): Es ist ein Neubau, so wie das Gebäude NÖ davon eine Grundschule ist.
Da bisher nur der Rohbau steht, ist das ein Platzhalter, ich kann es auch gerne in Wzlbrft ändern. Irgendwann soll da die Sparkasse und Polizei hinein kommen. Daher ist die Diskussion jetzt müßig.
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 17:31:15+00:00): reverted the spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166268605
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 21:04:10+00:00): Reverted spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166277179
FroschForscher (2025-05-13 15:09:43+00:00): Hallo kbre,
capacity an amenity=charging_station gibt an wie viele Autos (gleichzeitig) geladen werden können. Für die Details zu den Steckern gibt es die socket: Unterschlüssel.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station#Merkmale,_die_im_Zusammenhang_verwendet_werden

maxstay wird i.Ü. mit "hours" anstelle von "stunden" angegeben. Hab ich schon verbessert.

FroschForscher
kbre (2025-05-13 15:13:27+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Änderung; man lernt dazu.
Kovoschiz (2025-05-13 08:39:03+00:00): Don't edit and upload here for personal use. This is a live public database. Please use actual applications. https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/
aharvey (2025-05-13 05:07:36+00:00): natural=tree_row should be used on a linear way not an area covering the foliage, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=tree_row

Also please don't tag leaf_cycle and leaf_type as mixed as a way to tag unknown, only select it if they really are mixed. These all appear to be broad-leaved evergreens, but it's only a guess from imagery.

Further some of these aren't really tree_row, you've just drawn an area around a group of trees, it's better to just use a node for each individual tree in that case.

While additions of buildings and trees in OSM is very welcome and we appreciate any contributions, please don't use OSM as a playground for your own modelling work. You could take an extract for that and then use that data in private, otherwise if you want to contribute back to OSM I'm happy to help with feedback to improve your contributions.
Alexis Giraud-Courtney (2025-05-13 10:56:02+00:00): Please do not revert this change I will fix the wikivoyage tag and delete it
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 16:21:34+00:00): reverted the vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166265336
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 16:29:48+00:00): reverted the vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166265696
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-30 16:39:24+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8258765045/history has access:foot = permissive that was added in this edit
Would using foot access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot ) be fitting at least equally well?

Usage statistics are sometimes wrong and should not be blindly followed, but are worth looking at - see http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/foot/&***/access%3Afoot/
dcapillae (2025-05-13 06:44:07+00:00): Hola de nuevo.

Este conjunto de cambios fue revertido.

La etiqueta «cycleway:right:lane=pictogram» se usa en carriles bici segregados. Más información: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway:lane

El carril que hay en esta calle es un carril compartido entre vehículos motorizados y bicicletas (no segregado). Es un carril 30 de uso preferente para bicicletas: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dcapillae/diary/395398.

Estos carriles ya están en el mapa. Puede verlos en la capa CyclOSM como una línea azul discontinua: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/36.721261/-4.440907&layers=Y.

Si encuentra alguno que no esté en el mapa, puede añadirlo. En el wiki se explica cómo hacerlo: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Transporte_p%C3%BAblico_en_M%C3%A1laga#Carriles_30_de_uso_preferente_para_bicicletas.

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
dcapillae (2025-05-13 06:32:00+00:00): Hola de nuevo.

Este conjunto de cambios fue revertido por las mismas razones que este otro: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166162898.

En este mismo lugar aparecen en el mpa tres contenedores:

- Para papel y cartón: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9592685084
- Para botellas de cristal: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9592693272
- Para envases de plástico y latas: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9592689350

¿Hay alguno más? Si también ha visto un contenedor marrón (residuos orgánicos) que todavía no aparece en el mapa, habría que añadirlo como un nodo y etiquetarlo como:

amenity=recycling
recycling_type=container
recycling:organic=yes

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
Alexis Giraud-Courtney (2025-05-13 10:55:44+00:00): Please do not revert this change I will fix the wikivoyage tag and delete it
Herr Bause (2026-05-10 09:08:05+00:00): Hallo
Die der Überweg am Kreiverkehr hat mittig der Straße keine Insel, ich korrigiers
evgenykatyshev (2025-05-13 12:57:39+00:00): Hello! Thanks for you contributing.

I guess the object you've added is just a bench in forest, right? If so, it should be marked as bench, not as outdoor_seating (latter is for places next to cafe). And name should be filled only if object has any name, it mustn't be used for describing type of an object
hosasack (2025-05-14 06:12:06+00:00): Hi
Yes it's only an bench in the forest. I has no Name.

Regards
Andreas
mavl (2025-05-13 14:43:45+00:00): Здравствуйте. Зачем-то добавлены адресные теги на точки.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9509767766
mavl (2025-05-13 15:17:00+00:00): Даже на точки реки добавлено название улицы. Это нужно удалять.  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6850743311/history
Alexis Giraud-Courtney (2025-05-13 10:55:33+00:00): Please do not revert this change I will fix the wikivoyage tag and delete it
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 16:21:35+00:00): reverted the vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166265336
buy_osmand (2025-08-24 10:20:49+00:00): I, buy_osmand hereby affirms the great value of the ground_survey `check_dates` by good mapper, Skycaptnkragg.

Your good works current & future, without monetary compensation is highly recognized.

I, buy_osmand, Living man of the island known in the Book of Nations as, the Republik of Singapura

ٱلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ,
as-salāmu ʿalaykum,
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166185447
Jay May (2025-05-15 11:39:24+00:00): Please do NOT mark old Soviet administrative divisions as if they still existed. They are not relevant today and it will only add confusion on Kazakhstan's already messy map.
If you want to add those, add "was:" before any tags (was:name; was:administrative_division, etc.)
Вальдимар (2025-05-16 05:16:16+00:00): 
ok i will try
muralito (2025-05-13 18:38:07+00:00): Hi. Why are you tagging ref=12 and ref=6?
MonteRosa1 (2025-05-15 15:32:09+00:00): Hello muralito,
I noticed gaps in ref tagging at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1383914723, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1383914723, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118482314. To maintain consistency, I inferred and restored the missing ref tags based on nearby segments, but missed seeing that you had previously removed them in the feature history. Upon reviewing this area, I now see a recently completed stretch of Ruta 6 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1383914735) around San Ramón where Ruta 12 may also terminate now. I trust your knowledge of the refs in this area, and will defer to your edits.
Have a nice day!
aceman444 (2025-05-16 08:54:38+00:00): Zdravim, dakujeme za doplnenia.

Poprosim ale trochu zmysluplnejsie popisy sad zmien ako len "nove", pozrite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn .
eggie (2025-05-13 08:18:40+00:00): Dag gendov.. Tip... Probeer direct op de aanwezige adresnode bij te taggen. Je krijg anders steeds twee identieke adressen.
Ik heb wat samengevoegd.

MVG
eggie
Gendov (2025-05-13 09:47:43+00:00): Dank, voor de tip én het samenvoegen! Ik heb de resterende nodes ook samengevoegd.
user_5359 (2025-05-14 17:49:56+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/247Z. What is the mean of Technically verified = yes?
Mazda05 (2025-05-19 08:08:00+00:00): Доброго дня.

Тег access=no згідно з описом у вікі osm.wiki/Key:access позначає не тількі чи відкрит об'єкт, чи ні, а перш за все легальність користування об'єктом чи доступу к об'єкту.

Згідно протокольного рішення Кабінету Міністрів України №94 від 12.11.2014 "Про припинення руху в пунктах пропуску через державний кордон в Донецькій області для автомобільного сполучення „Успенка — Матвєєв Курган”, „Новоазовськ – Весело-Вознесенка” та для залізничного сполучення „Квашине – Успенська”" рух через пункт пропуску "Новоазовськ" тимчасово припинено та, станом на зараз, 19.05.2025, рух не відновлено.

Суверінетет України щодо цієї ділянки території підтверджується діючим ти чинним на сьогодні з обох сторін міжнародним договором "Договір між Україною і Російською Федерацією про українсько-російський державний кордон" / "Договор между Украиной и Российской Федерацией об украинско-российской государственной границе" від 28.01.2003, який діє з 23.04.2004 дотепер (точки 1322 osm.org/node/12231129222 та 1323 osm.org/node/337509001).

Згідно законодавства України, перетин державного кордону поза пунктів пропуску, що відкриті, кваліфікується як адміністративне правопорушення, зокрема за статтями 204-1, 204-2, 204-3, 204-4, 206-1, або як кримінальний злочин, зокрема за статтями 258-6, 332, 332-1, 332-2, які безпосередньо стосуються перетину державного кордону. Це є достатнім, щоб вважати, що access=no позначенний на highway=* в пункті пропуску та до державного кордону є найбільш відповідним, згідно з описом на wiki osm.wiki/Tag:access=no зокрема за "This tag is a proper method to mark existing objects such as path as existing but illegal to use. It includes illegal railway crossings, illegal paths through nature reserves etc. Such objects can be mapped but should be tagged as illegal to use by adding access=no.".

З 12.11.2014 і дотепер перетин державного кордону поза пунктів пропуску, що відкриті, не був дозволеній за законодавством.

Фізична можливість проїзду по дорозі позначена пов'язаністю лінійних об'єктів (way) highway=* між собою згідно рекомендації osm.wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground.

Згідно нечисленних правил OSM osm.wiki/How_We_Map, дані повинні бути правдивими (рішення КМУ №94 12.11.2014 дійсно є та діє) та підтвердженними (наведена інформація щодо рішення КМУ №94 12.11.2014, підтверджено суверенітет України міжнародним договором на цій ділянці, наведена причина нелегальності користування шляхами, що обговорюються).

Зважаючи на вищезазначене, прошу утриматись від подальших змін значення тегу access в пунктах пропуску через державний кордон там, де рух тимчасово припинений.
LuxuryCoop (2025-05-20 10:16:31+00:00): `building=주택`과 `building=근린생활시설` 태그를 적절한 값으로 바꾸고, 건물을 직각화했습니다.