CAM-Gerlach (2026-06-03 11:01:37+00:00): Given most of your claims don't make any sense given what either of us actually changed, I suspect you have somehow confused my changes here with something else entirely. I highly recommend the Better-OSM-org user script that shows much more clearly what changed, or if not using OSMCha to view this changeset: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183534285

> Thứ nhất: Theo Nghị quyết số 202/2025/QH15, sau khi sắp xếp, cả nước có 34 đơn vị hành chính cấp tỉnh (gồm 28 tỉnh và 06 thành phố trực thuộc Trung ương) thì tỉnh Bình Thuận không còn trên bản đồ.

Sorry, but how does that have anything to do with either your changesets or this changeset reverting them? Nothing in your changes so much as referred to "Bình Thuận" anywhere I can see, much less changed anything to do with provincial naming.

Of course, if there are other changes you want to see on the map, you are welcome to update it accordingly, after consulting with the local Viet Namese mapping community and carefully following all OSM guidelines, conventions and good practices. If you don't want to make the changes yourself, you are welcome to leave an OSM note describing them in detail and linking to sources, for otherm mappers to reference in teh future.

> Thứ 2: Đường mà mấy ông ghi là đường ven biển là hoàn toàn sai, nó là đường ĐT716B

Again, neither your changesets nor mine reverting them touched any roads whatsoever, nor even changed the addr:street=* tag on existing objects, so your claim that "I" somehow labeled some road as such doesn't make sense. 

Furthermore, I see the road running through this area is already tagged according to what you said, as ref=ĐT.716 . If you believe the name=* does not match either signage, addresses or widespread usage and have sources to support that, you are free to update it or at least add a note describing it in detail (though I would strongly recommend consulting with other local mappers first before such major changes).

> Thứ 3: Tôi định vị vị trí của "Công ty" tôi trên bản đồ nhằm mục đích chỉ đường chứ không phải SEO như ông nói.

SEO spam on OSM is defined by its characteristics, not by intent. Your account was issued an official warning by the OSM administrators due to promotional SEO spam on its profile, More directly relevant to this changeset, both the description=* tag and the note=* tag contained rather blatant SEO self-promotion, which is strictly prohibited on OSM and was one reason for it being reverted per OSM policy. See e.g. https://osm.wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam :

> Often the Changeset Description and Description tag contain marketing hype. Marketing hype is not objectively verifiable and breaks one of OSM's key criteria of verifiability. Unverifiable claims should be deleted

And description=* https://osm.wiki/Key:description#No_advertising :

> The description should only include neutral and factual information about the object. It should not include subjective evaluations, e.g. "the best restaurant in town", "modern, comfortable hotel, in the heart of the city". Do not use description=* for advertising messages. They will be removed as spam and may also have further consequences for your OSM account.

> Thứ 4: Hiện tại chỉ có google maps họ mới cập nhật lại và đúng với Quy định về tên đường địa chỉ của Nhà nước Việt Nam theo Nghị quyết mới.

Once again, neither your changes, this revert or the reasons for it involved anything to do with road names nor addresses. If you believe they should be updated and have independent, allowable sources for that information (e.g. official government documents/websites), you can leave a detailed OSM Note, or update them yourself after consulting with your local community. Do note that copying from Google Maps (or other maps or sources that aren't explicitly license-compatible with OSM) to update them is strictly prohibited and may be a violation of local and international copyright law.

The issue that is relevant here is the fact that your changeset directly references Google Maps and appeared to be at least partially based on Google Maps data, judging from the image=* tag as well as your comments referencing it and directly alluding to that fact. Therefore, per copyright law and OSM policy it had to be immediately reverted (in addition to the promotional content).

> Fifth: You should familiarize yourself with these recent changes—particularly the updated road names—to ensure accuracy and provide correct information to users.

Unlike yourself, I am not a local mapper this area, so I neither have the responsibility to nor would it be appropriate for me to make such changes, I just go around the world cleaning up spam and promotion. You, on the other hand, are once again more than welcome to make such changes after consultation with the Viet Namese mapping community, or leave a note for other local mappers describing in detail what you think should be changed, why, and links to appropriate allowable sources.

Best of luck.