piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
sorcrosc (2025-01-31 14:37:47+00:00): Non ho usato terminologia offensiva né c'è stato tentativo di offendere.
Il modo di esprimermi sbrigativo è per l'esasperazione di dover fare sempre il cane da guardia, anche con utenti che mappano da 15 anni.
Dovresti sapere che gratuito non significa libero e non si può copiare liberamente ma ci sono licenze da rispettare.
Nel caso del portale PCN, che so io, l'unica autorizzazione che abbiamo è per l'uso delle immagini aeree da ricalcare. Le altre mappe/dati non si possono usare.

Lorenzo
at1839 (2025-01-31 15:48:56+00:00): E per fortuna che la qualifica di cane da guardia te la sei affibbiata da solo.

Allora facciamo così. Io la mia opinione te l'ho detta, adesso tu controlla se hai ragione o hai torto, come capita pure a te anche se te ne dimentichi. Poi torna e, magari senza abbaiare, spiegami perché non dovrei indicare IGM come fonte di verifica di questa tipologia di dati.

Paolo.
totera (2025-02-06 00:51:28+00:00): Ciao Paolo,
tu sai se l'IGM permette di riutilizzare i propri dati? Il fatto che siano accessibili a tutti gratuitamente non ti dice nulla sul loro possibile riutilizzo.
Le questioni riguardanti licenze e copyright sono molto complesse, se hai mai seguito qualche discussione saprai che è opportuno essere molto cauti perché eventuali azioni legali potrebbero mettere l'intero progetto (e quindi anche il lavoro compiuto da tutti noi mappatori) a rischio di sopravvivenza.
Esempio abbastanza noto: il caso in Inghilterra in cui l'Ordnance Survey (equivalente del nostro IGM) ha ottenuto
dall'Automobile Association (più o meno la nostra ACI) un risarcimento di 20 milioni di sterline proprio per questioni di copyright sulle mappe http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/1203480.stm
at1839 (2025-02-06 13:18:42+00:00): Carissimo, 

potrei cominciare col precisare che non ho derivato i toponimi da fonti esterne, mi sono limitato a verificare che le fonti concordassero con quanto già ampiamente noto sulla base di conoscenza diretta del territorio.

Ma poiché sono stato io a indicare IGM come fonte e poiché non l'ho fatto per caso, veniamo al punto.

Intanto ti consiglierei di leggere questo articolo di Maurizio Napolitano
https://napo.medium.com/openstreetmap-conquista-anche-listituto-geografico-militare-bfcb889c8a48

Poi ti invito a scaricare dal sito di IGM 
https://www.igmi.org/it/dbsn-database-di-sintesi-nazionale
qualche sezione del database, aprirlo con (esempio) QGIS, consultare il layer loc_sg.
Il database è rilasciato con licenza Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL) ver. 1.0.

In alternativa, se l'utilizzo di un sistema informativo geografico ti dovesse provocare qualche prurito, lo stesso layer, non a caso si chiama toponimi_igm, lo trovi sul Geoportale Nazionale Mase. 
https://gn.mase.gov.it/portale/home
I dati in questo caso sono distribuiti con licenza CC BY 4.0

Ma anche a prescindere dalle licenze, quello che ti direbbe qualsiasi avvocato è che in questo caso è chiara, anzi chiarissima,
la volontà del legislatore di recepire la direttiva Direttiva UE 2019/1024.

Vorrei pacatamente aggiungere che a tutto quello che ti ho segnalato saresti potuto arrivare da solo senza bisogno di commentare il changeset. 

Ma almeno tu non sei stato inutilmente aggressivo al limite della maleducazione. 

Poi se quanto ti ho segnalato non ti dovesse convincere fino in fondo, magari è l'occasione buona per postare una RFC sulla lista di discussione di OSM Italia.

Un saluto. Paolo
SomeoneElse (2025-02-02 13:38:24+00:00): Rather than saying "healthcare fixed" it would be much better to explain what you've changed things from, what you've changed they to and why you've changed it.

healthcare=osteopath is a tag that people actually consume: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/healthcare=osteopath#projects .  Your unexpected tagfiddling here could result in things disappearing from maps.
SomeoneElse (2025-02-02 13:41:15+00:00): The purpose of the OSM wiki is to document how people map, not to tell them how to map.
Did you discuss this edit beforehand as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct ?
If not, then your actions are actively making OSM worse for editors and data consumers, not better.
thetornado76 (2025-02-02 16:57:32+00:00): Unfortunately the comment isn't particularly meaningful. I vow to get better.  
I think it makes more sense to change to approved healthcare:speciality with a usage of over 2200 for osteopathy to make evaluations easier, rather than healthcare=osteopath which has only been used once worldwide.
SomeoneElse (2025-02-03 10:14:01+00:00): Thanks - it does make sense to tidy very small numbers of these where they mean the same thing, but the challenge with things like osteopaths is that it's a field that overlaps between regular and "alternative" medicine.  The wikipedia article has a bit of background on it - that's basically written to describe it as quackery but then goes on to say that in the USA there are regular medical degrees specialising in it, and those are recognised as such by many other countries.
On maps I create I show "normal" medicine with a pink "health" icon and "alternative" medicine as regular shops.
One of the two you changed recently looked like a regular sports science clinic and one seems to be more at the "alternative" end.  Arguably my map display was half right and half wrong before, and now still is, although the other way around!  Because the tagging was the same in each case, there's nothing that we can do to separate them.
Kees 59 (2026-02-10 10:36:11+00:00): A bit late. But there are a couple of barrier=fence in this changeset which have "fence_type=0.5 m". Would that value perhaps be the height? If so it should probably  be in the height key.

Way: 1355629951, 1355629952, 1355629953, and 1355629954.
James Derrick (2026-02-10 11:42:04+00:00): Hi,
Always time to fix something!

Yes, it does look like a JOSM template slip - thanks for spotting my error.
Fixed (unless you can spot more?):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178355263
Happy Mapping,

James
zuicz (2025-02-01 16:33:54+00:00): Skąd ten zawijas?
adamos (2025-02-01 22:33:50+00:00): Cześć, prawdopodobnie jest zła ulica jednokierunkowa między tadeusza a Rynek. Czy możesz to zweryfikować, jeśli znasz to miejsce, czy możesz to zmienić? Dziękuję
zuicz (2025-02-01 23:18:19+00:00): Faktycznie, wiele lat wisiało błędne oneway=yes na Sienkiewicza. Poprawiłem
adamos (2025-02-02 00:00:17+00:00): Dzięki
AlexBoeing (2025-01-31 19:32:47+00:00): Hi! Thanks for adding a restaurant :) Are you sure it occupies the whole building? If not, I suggest adding a separate node and moving the restaurant tags to it
robinmetral (2025-02-01 05:01:09+00:00): Hi, thanks for the feedback! It occupies the entire ground floor, but maybe it makes more sense to add as a separate node anyways. Will do!
robinmetral (2025-02-01 05:03:36+00:00): Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162000298
AlexBoeing (2025-02-01 07:57:43+00:00): Thank you! I've been working on this area for a while, so  I keep a close eye on any changes 😄
robinmetral (2025-02-01 08:05:11+00:00): That's great! Are you using whodidit? I'm just passing through but I've picked up a habit of adding spots I visit. That Korean place is really good by the way, adorable owners and fantastic banchan.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-27 10:38:10+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and other mistagging for POI in changeset 184689126

https://osm.org/changeset/184689126
bxl-forever (2025-01-31 12:03:02+00:00): Hello,

I think this is a rather unusual way to fix the problem.  It looks like this street https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1072029253 was drawn in the wrong direction.  Maybe there is a "no right turn" somewhere, but simply to alert drivers not to turn into a one-way road against the flow of traffic.  These situations are common and we don’t use turn relations.

I see you are mapping for Mapbox, so you probably are mapping after reading reports from users.  Did they say anything special about that street?

I tried to inspect the "streetlevel imagery;streetside;mapillary;kartaview " which you claim to use as the source for this changeset 161971123 and found this on Mapillary, which confirms the street has been mapped in the wrong direction.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1035061384868260

Unless you have more recent information, I suggest we reverse Doggeweg and remove the turn relation.
Gleb_Artyomenko (2025-02-03 12:41:28+00:00): Hello, bxl-forever. You are right. We have analyzed this issue in the team and found evidence on the mapillary source that it is possible to change the direction of one-way traffic here. Thank you for your comment! The restriction will be removed. Best regards, Gleb
TrickyFoxy (2025-01-31 12:34:12+00:00): Лучше не удалять такие названия, а переносить в alt_name=* или подобное
rskedgell (2025-02-01 23:12:29+00:00): (Review requested)

Hi, thanks for updating your details. It looks fine to me.
literan (2025-02-01 11:17:59+00:00): это номер корпуса, а не название улицы
philippec (2025-01-31 23:05:38+00:00): Ik denk dat de AED fout staat.  Met 1 foto is het natuurlijk moeilijk zeker te zijn.
pavvv (2025-01-31 11:28:10+00:00): Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments and describe your changes in English when mapping outside Belarus.
fdv (2025-01-31 11:34:33+00:00): Accept the remark. I have already corrected myself. I am returning to the project after a nine-year break.
Piskvor (2025-01-31 16:20:04+00:00): omylem spojeny fixy Florenc a Kyje do jednoho velkého CS :(
mavl (2025-02-05 14:02:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162167075 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: wrong values for name:en - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161608012].
archie (2025-01-31 11:20:21+00:00): Hej, jag har reverterat denna changeset. Anledningen är att du har flyttat rätt placerade vägar m m till fel position. 
Vänligen flytta inte innan du har justerat din bildbakgrund (detta gäller speciellt Bing). Satellitbilderna visar inte rätt position förrän de är lägesjusterade. 
Annars tack för dina bidrag. Fortsätt, men flytta inte redan inritade objekt förrän du har justerat din bildbakgrund.
Tack!
mixpix26 (2025-01-31 11:38:57+00:00): Hej! 
Tack för informationen jag ska se till att justera in satellitbilderna nästa gång!
mueschel (2025-02-02 09:47:41+00:00): Hi,
naptan tags with a suffix for station parts are not in use up to now. Would it be possible to add them to different objects instead? The main node could get both values as a list as well.
DaveF (2025-02-02 12:18:56+00:00): What would you suggest, bearing in mind Liverpool St. NR/Eliz is deemed as one station?

Are Atcos used?
mueschel (2025-02-08 09:44:26+00:00): It's hard to judge what the best solution is. If the codes refer to different parts of the station, I would map them as such. If the station just has two codes, I'd add them in the main tag as a list.

Nevertheless, could you decide for one spelling of the suffix?
E.g. there are:
network:wikidata:Elizabeth_Line
network:wikidata:Elizabeth_line
network:wikidata:Elizabeth line
BCNorwich (2025-01-31 13:41:14+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The OSM database is to record data about on-the-ground verifiable features. It looks like this place, 10 Green Lane is an NHS surgery. The Travel Franchise website does not list this property as it's office. Thus I've removed your test listing node.

By all means map genuine Travel Franchise offices.

Regards Bernard.
mcliquid (2025-02-01 09:26:40+00:00): Vielen Dank! Die Notiz ist bei mir wohl untergegangen :)
karr4s (2025-03-11 22:40:18+00:00): Bonjour,
Je viens de vérifier sur place aujourd'hui et il n'y a pas de boîte à livre.
S'agit-il d'une boîte qui va être installée ? Autre question : quelle source avez-vous utilisé pour ajouter cette boîte à livre ?
karr4s (2025-03-18 07:59:46+00:00): J'ai supprimé la boîte à livre. N'hésitez pas à me redire si jamais il est prévu d'en installer une ici.
pavvv (2025-01-31 16:32:11+00:00): Tak oznaczamy miejsca zamknięte: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
trigpoint (2025-02-16 08:51:40+00:00): Reverted in changeset 162562034  DWG Revert of SEO spam edits .
rempshaener (2025-02-02 19:59:38+00:00): Hallo,
bei der Nennweite von Hydranten wird die Einheit nicht angegeben, weil implizit "mm" gilt.
Das betrifft diese Objekte: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=area%5Bname%3DLandshut%5D%3B%0Anode%5Bemergency%3Dfire_hydrant%5D%5B%22fire_hydrant%3Adiameter%22%7E%22mm%24%22%5D%28area%29%28user%3Adiddel%29%3B%0Aout%20meta%3B&C=48.527235%3B12.162123%3B13&R=
Könntest du das anpassen?
Viele Grüße
jpennycook (2025-11-10 16:00:16+00:00): Hi!

You added the right of way reference to the "name" tag - these should be recorded in the "prow_ref" tag instead - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:prow%20ref?uselang=en-GB
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-31 12:10:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1355651110

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ChrissW-R1 (2025-01-31 12:25:06+00:00): Reverted in https://osm.org/changeset/161975229
4004 (2025-02-02 00:53:43+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
так получилось просто здание с названием - думаю, не хватает обозначения этого как автомастерской или магазина?
BuraButcher (2025-02-06 11:04:52+00:00): Добрый день. Извиняюсь за долгий ответ. Это автомастерская
4004 (2025-02-07 10:56:13+00:00): спасибо, тогда добавлю тег shop=car_repair
silversurfer83 (2025-01-31 16:34:54+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

Danke, dass du hifst die Karte aktuell zu halten.

Die Post schreibt in ihren Nutzungsbedingungen:
#############
Nutzungsbedingungen der PLZ-Suche
1. Gegenstand der Nutzung

Die kostenlose PLZ-Suche der Deutsche Post AG (nachfolgend DP AG genannt) gibt dem Nutzer die Möglichkeit, Postleitzahlen und Straßen in Deutschland in der Datenbank von Deutsche Post AG zu suchen. Die Lieferung der Daten durch DP AG erfolgt ausschließlich zur eigenen, privaten Nutzung. Zur Nutzung der kostenlosen PLZ- Suche berechtigt sind unbeschränkt geschäftsfähige, natürliche Personen, die gemäß § 13 BGB Verbraucher sind  nachfolgend Nutzer. Das Abfragevolumen ist pro Nutzer und pro Tag auf 200 Beauskunftungen begrenzt. Nach je 60 Beauskunftungen wird der Nutzer zur Eingabe eines reCaptchas (Vollautomatisierter Test zur Feststellung, ob die Anfrage von einem Mensch oder einer Maschine vorgenommen wird) aufgefordert. Eine Beauskunftung im Sinne dieses Dienstes ist die Auswahl einer Adresse bzw. die Anzeige der Suchtreffer. Nach mehr als 200 Beauskunftungen pro Tag, wird der Nutzer für diesen Tag gesperrt. Die Verwendung der abgerufenen Daten zur Herstellung systematischer Sammlungen in jedweder Form, insbesondere zur Zusammenstellung einer neuen Datenbank, ist untersagt. Die Weitergabe der gelieferten Daten durch den Nutzer an Dritte darf nur mit vorheriger Zustimmung von Deutsche Post Direkt im Auftrag der DP AG erfolgen. Dritter in diesem Sinne ist jede andere natürliche oder juristische Person. Die gewerbliche Durchführung von Adressabgleichen, Adressvermietungen, Datenanreicherungen sowie sonstiger Dienstleistungen aufgrund von Datenbeständen, die unter Nutzung der von der DP AG gelieferten Daten bereinigt wurden bedarf ebenfalls der vorherigen Zustimmung von DP AG. Verletzt der Nutzer die Pflichten aus diesem Abschnitt schuldhaft, so ist die DP AG berechtigt, Schadensersatz zu verlangen.

Eine Nutzung der der PLZ-Suche zu Grunde liegenden Daten durch Unternehmen und/oder für gewerbliche Zwecke bedarf einer Lizenzierung der Daten bei Deutsche Post Direkt GmbH. Hierzu bietet Deutsche Post Direkt unterschiedliche Lösungen an (siehe auch https://www.deutschepost.de/de/d/deutsche-post-direkt/datafactory.html, Kontakt: plzsuche@postdirekt.de).

############

Die Quelle ist leider nicht zulässig und daher muss deine Änderung revertiert werden. 

Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161983821

Und https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_Compatibility

Bei Fragen immer raus damit
silversurfer83
JonSnowWhite (2025-02-01 12:18:38+00:00): Alternative source: local knowledge?
JonSnowWhite (2025-06-04 10:42:08+00:00): Hallo nochmal,

@silversurfer83 ich würde den change gerne nochmal submitten diesmal ohne die post als source, sondern nur mit local knowledge. Kann ich das ganze dafür irgendwie einfach wieder öffnen / reicht local knowledge als source aus?
hocu (2025-01-31 13:07:20+00:00): It's my mistake. The comment should have mentioned "Honorary consulates", rather than "Consulate-General"
Rom1 (2025-02-04 12:46:23+00:00): Pour info, Dynamo est déjà décrit à https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1606992228 Merci.
os-emmer (2025-04-01 21:45:19+00:00): Hallo NVBW_Seifert,
du hast hier einen fragewürdigen Wert bei wikidata eingetragen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1355658521
Was ist hier gemeint?
os-emmer (2025-04-05 19:08:38+00:00): Ich habe das jetzt fürs erste angepasst und ein fixme eingetragen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164564952
NVBW_Seifert (2025-04-07 04:54:50+00:00): vielen Dank für den Hinweis und das Du den Fehler schon beseitigt hast.
Ich habe den width-Wert jetzt korrigiert und das fixme entfernt.
viele Grüße
O Fim (2025-01-31 20:37:08+00:00): Não basta apenas adicionar uma via que não existe, via claramente um corredor de estacionamento, etiqueta errada falta de tipo de piso, via exclusiva de clientes
ilias_ (2025-01-31 16:28:31+00:00): Bien vu! Je n'étais même pas au courant que la Route de l'Oasis avait été renommée Boulevard Abdellah Cherkaoui... il y a 2 ans et demi déjà. Puisque notre chère commune ne communique jamais clairement ce genre de changements (assez importants), j'ai dû le découvrir à travers un article obscur... https://www.anwarpress.com/280078/
Taya_S (2025-02-02 10:54:50+00:00): Hello,

Could you explain what you mean with "dcxx". Did you read this? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Could you also explain why you deleted the administrative centre Putrajaya in this changeset?

Taya Snijder
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
NeatNit (2025-02-20 19:00:39+00:00): You moved a couple of bus stops in this changeset, was that by accident?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-31 13:20:49+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12546382630

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Wynndale (2025-01-31 13:28:15+00:00): Kneller Hall has been sold off and is being converted to a school.
pigsonthewing (2025-01-31 13:53:56+00:00): Thank you; conformed on website. Updated to "disused"
Leo Slager (2025-02-01 11:04:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
joeria (2025-02-03 10:28:24+00:00): Hoi Leo,
Bedankt voor je welkomstbericht!
Gr. Joeri
mavl (2025-02-01 13:23:15+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок обозначает земельные участки как здания. Проверьте, пожалуйста.  
  
 Например:  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1355663001  
  
Тегом building обозначают только здание, а не весь участок.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:building
Yog Sot (2025-02-01 18:54:44+00:00): tak, to była fikcja
Allison P (2025-01-31 20:15:24+00:00): Do not engage in further edit warring. I have already explained the issue with your edits. Any more edits of this nature will be reported to the Data Working Group.
pavvv (2025-01-31 16:33:38+00:00): Co to jest??
Marek-M (2025-01-31 16:52:26+00:00): Ten POI już był dodany kilka dni temu - https://www.osm.org/node/12531934673

Usuwam Twój duplikat, pozdrawiam!
xerlix (2025-02-01 17:39:22+00:00): Dzięki! Dane w Organic Maps były o kilka dni starsze i nie widziałem go.
BCNorwich (2025-01-31 17:14:57+00:00): Hi. I've tweaked your tagging and removed the relation, it's not needed.

Regards Bernard.
Nikita Moiseev (2025-02-04 06:23:21+00:00): Дорогой "moszkva ter" прошу впредь более подробно подписывать комментарии к пакетам правок, так как "b," - не является достоверным комментарием и данный пакет правом может быть удалён. Благодарю за понимание!
pavvv (2025-01-31 16:36:19+00:00): 1. Jakie jest źródło tej nazwy?
2. Nazwy ulic oznaczamy jako name=*. Proszę czytać wiki.
Programista Kolejowy (2025-01-31 21:29:11+00:00): Google Maps + https://www.unitedstateszipcodes.org/
pavvv (2025-01-31 21:37:23+00:00): Niestety nie można legalnie kopiować danych z Google Maps ani Google Street View do OSM. Poza tym często znajdują się tam błędne informacje.

Jako źródło ulic możesz wykorzystać wizytę w terenie i zobaczyć, gdzie tabliczki wskazują, że ulica się znajduje lub możesz użyć podkładu Geportal: Nazwy ulic. Nazwy ulic oznaczamy w tagu name=*.
Programista Kolejowy (2025-02-02 17:15:38+00:00): https://www.unitedstateszipcodes.org/ to już nie jest google maps
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-26 13:43:03+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12439467082/history has width = 0 that was added in this edit
how something exist and have width=0?
Tomasz Buchholz (2025-01-31 21:29:57+00:00): Cześć,
Czy ta zmiana ma jakieś źródło lub była przedyskutowana na forum?
Dawid2849 (2025-02-01 09:59:20+00:00): Nie no, to już jest jakaś przesada. Może wszystkie drogi w Warszawie oznaczmy jako secondary, bo przecież to *stolyca*?
W3NET0wns (2025-02-01 13:55:10+00:00): Wg. Geoportal ta droga powinna być oznaczona jako drugorzędna
:-} (2025-02-01 15:53:12+00:00): Gościu. Ten geoportal to ty sobie możesz przy obrysie działek wykorzystywać co najwyżej a nie przy oznaczaniu dróg.
SpinOff (2025-02-01 21:10:05+00:00): W OSM bardzo ważna jest kategoria sąsiednich dróg. Białołęcka to zupełnie inna droga niż Płochocińska i Kondratowicza, więc nie może mieć tej samej kategorii. Właśnie obniżyłem kategorię Wielkiego Dębu, dzięki czemu Białołęcka powinna być bardziej wyróżniona.
Yog Sot (2025-02-01 18:56:32+00:00): na orpomapie widać, ale nie widać czy to przypadkiem nie jest przejscie dla zwierząt. Tak czy sią dodałem to.
LordGarySugar (2025-02-07 00:14:36+00:00): Hi, building=house should only be used for individual houses, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1355676289 is three connected houses that should either be drawn as 3x connected building=house or one building=terrace (less detailed).

You can enable a cadastral parcel overlay under Background Settings which will show you dividing lines between properties
stephenpen543 (2025-02-13 14:06:54+00:00): Thank you, I wasn't aware of that
Leo Slager (2025-02-01 11:08:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2025-02-01 11:10:24+00:00): Dag Ben,
Op het gebouw aan de N zijde van het veld staat ook nog de naam O.V.V.O./Amsterdam Lions.
Kun je dat ook aanpassen ?
Udarian (2025-01-31 23:07:43+00:00): there is no way this is correct
Udarian (2025-01-31 23:11:22+00:00): I am certain loanDepot Park hasn't had its location changed, and it is even more unlikely that it would move into downtown.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161995732
Yog Sot (2025-02-01 19:05:06+00:00): krzywo dodane... poprawiłem według ortomapy
Programista Kolejowy (2025-02-02 17:14:35+00:00): Dzięki. Możliwe że wykrzywiło mi się lekko