piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ItsAlyx (2026-04-10 22:41:14+00:00): Hi, it's good to see you back with some more changes around here :)

When mapping townhouses, or in general buildings that share a wall/are physically connected, you should map them so that they have shared corners, with no gap between them. When making a new area in the editor, you should notice that you can "snap" a point to another existing point while drawing the area, in this case you want to snap the shared corners together.

Also, with townhouses, when you are selecting the kind of feature they are, it's better to select the "Townhouse" feature preset, instead of the "House" preset, when searching. Or, if you don't want to bother mapping every unit individually, you can draw an area encompassing a full row of townhouses as one area, and pick the "Row of Townhouses" preset.
ieguy3 (2026-04-09 04:29:25+00:00): 2026 population is around 124k but can't find the state data
rempshaener (2026-04-12 19:00:35+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Zu deinen Bearbeitungen habe ich folgende Anmerkungen:
couplings: In das Feld kommt nur die Anzahl der Kupplungen, nicht die Größen.
couplings:diameters: Die Angabe der Größen erfolgt semikolongetrennt.
ref: Die Hydrantennummer wird ohne weitere Angaben erfasst, d. h. das „Nr.“ müsste raus.
fire_hydrant:pressure: Die Einheit wird nicht angegeben, „bar“ ist Standard.
water_source: Die Angabe „trinkwassernetz_y“ ist kein zulässiger Wert; die Regel ist „main“
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
DodoGTA (2026-04-09 07:50:17+00:00): Well the broken multipolygon was actually removed (so the comment should probably be "Replace broken multipolygon with an area" instead)
ItsAlyx (2026-04-10 22:52:02+00:00): Hi, it seems like in this changeset you accidentally snapped some corners of the houses you made to be attached to the Westminster City Limits administrative boundary line. In the future, when you're trying to work with features that are very close to other features, you can hold down the "Alt" key on your keyboard while dragging a node, and it will no longer snap to nearby objects, as long as you are holding the key down.

Something else I would recommend would be to go into the "Map Data" tab on the right side of your editor, and in that window, if you scroll down, you can choose to change the visibility of certain things in the "Map Features" section. I personally always have the "Boundaries" section set to invisible, since it is very rare that you actually need to edit that, and it oftentimes gets in the way of things.

I'll go ahead and fix the issue here, so don't worry about this one, just keep it in mind for the future :)
NeisBot (2026-04-09 05:00:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13717694117 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dentist office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 10:33:06+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181451083
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
HSL_PALAUTE (2026-04-09 12:03:25+00:00): Nyt kun teet muokkauksia ja lisäilet aktiivisesti access=destination tageja väylille, niin esimerkiksi väylällä https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372989340 olet poistanut motor_vehicle=destination + foot=yes + bicycle=yes tagit kokonaan ja jättänyt pelkän access=destination tagin. Tämä johtaa siihen, että läpireititys kaikilta kulkumuodoilta on estetty, onko tämä tarkoituksenmukaista?
TrickyFoxy (2026-05-15 19:53:03+00:00): 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении
NeisBot (2026-04-09 05:18:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/9717825379 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Chiropractic office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 10:33:08+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181451087
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
NeisBot (2026-04-09 05:36:28+00:00): 🌍 OSM에 오신 것을 환영합니다, 우브로.
기여해 주셔서 감사합니다!

他の 사용자들과의 협력을 쉽게 하기 위해, 그리고 다른 사람들이 귀하의 편집을 이해할 수 있도록, 변경 사항에 대한 짧은 설명을 추가하는 것이 좋습니다. 명확한 코멘트는 커뮤니티가 귀하의 작업을 따라가고 더 나은 피드백을 제공하는 데 도움이 됩니다. 좋은 코멘트를 작성하는 팁은 여기[1]에서 찾을 수 있습니다.

✅ 여기에 지도 편집 내용에 기반한 샘플 코멘트가 있습니다: "이디아커피대전학하점이라는 이름의 카페와 커피숍 음식점 추가"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, 우브로.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added cafe with coffee shop cuisine and name 이디아커피대전학하점"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
Alliegaytor (2026-04-09 05:57:03+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

Just letting you know in the case that this is accidental -- you've dragged a few address nodes away from their original locations. E.g:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12419417772/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12412241208/history

Were those intentional?

You also seem to have connected a path and a power line together (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13717800209). Nodes on power lines are generally meant to be poles.
nevw (2026-04-09 07:20:17+00:00): Another view... the red dots appear to be the nodes likely accidentally moved.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=181078914
crushtheserpent (2026-04-09 05:42:10+00:00): Added park info & paths, added church, edited bus relation to correct route
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-01 02:32:05+00:00): Hi,

If you're going to add businesses to OSM for your clients, you have an obligation (to both your client and to us) to at least make every reasonable effort to use correct tags and values. Essentially every tag added here is used incorrectly to the point of being nonsensical, which both pollutes the map with junk data and means they will not be intelligible to data consumers reading the map, defeating the purpose of your efforts here.

It's really not _that_ hard to use iD's beginner-friendly presets to fill in this information correctly, or spend a few minutes reading the wiki on how to format your tags properly. After all, you are being _paid_ to do this properly for your client.

Fortunately for you, other volunteer mappers already fixed most of this for you in changeset 181169404 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181169404 , and I fixed the remaining issue in changeset 182055783 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182055783 To be honest, given the complete lack of good faith effort in this changeset if that hadn't been the case I would have reverted it out of hand (and other mappers would be justified doing the same). Consider yourself warned.

Thanks.
mueschel (2026-04-16 09:36:21+00:00): Hi,
you used many fuel tags that are not used in any other place. Could you check the Wiki for common tags and change them individually? 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fuel:*
Timmy_Tesseract (2026-04-13 04:29:38+00:00): Good day. Would you mind sharing your reverting workflow? Especially for cases when you notice that affected objects have already been edited in the meantime.  

Method seems to have improved since changeset/180762095 as now tags of already conducted repairs are preserved.  

But somehow this revert has removed numerous nodes from way member list for no apparent reason, causing several new geometry and connectivity issues.
Wildsharky (2026-04-22 06:28:50+00:00): Hi Timmy_Tesseract,
Thank you for reaching out. I unintentionally removed relation member nodes while performing the revert on the changeset. I have fixed the issue in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181608866
I will also be more cautious about deleting valid, but incorrectly applied information on the map.
Timmy_Tesseract (2026-04-27 02:00:27+00:00): Thanks for fixing this and for your relentless efforts of fixing bad OSM data in general 😄
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-09 09:47:28+00:00): Skąd ten parking:right=shoulder ? To powinno być parking:right=lane z tego co widzę

O co chodzi w "description = znak droga pożarowa"? Cała Jasna to droga pożarowa? Czego?

cycleway:left=lane - jesteś pewien że tam pas rowerowy wymalowali? Na zdjęciach lotniczych jest kontraruch bez pasa
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-25 02:48:07+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184559312

https://osm.org/changeset/184559312
NeisBot (2026-04-09 06:42:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13717818470 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Oil Change Center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 10:33:11+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181451093
(Delete spam tags. First version)
Eith (2026-04-14 18:26:22+00:00): Zdravím, jste si jistý, že tato stezka již existuje? Když jsem tudy jel naposledy (20.3), nic tomu nenaznačovalo. Na portálu https://olkr.stavbycyklo.cz/ je stále označena, že získala stavební povolení, nikoliv že by byla již realizovaná.
hanoj (2026-04-16 09:18:10+00:00): Máš pravdu, vycházel jsem z úřední desky pro stanovení značek. Stavba teprve započala, hotovo bude o prázdninách.
IreuN (2026-04-09 13:16:41+00:00): A czemu nie przeniosłeś wszystkich tagów? 
Czemu zostawiłeś punkty z addr:city:simc i source:addr?
Ogólnie takie przenoszenie tagów z punktów na budynek nie jest szczególnie polecane.
DamianKosa (2026-04-09 20:02:45+00:00): Rozumiem, wszystkie tagi przeniosłem. Z tego co widzę, to budynki w sąsiedztwie nie zawsze mają punkty adresowe osobno
NeisBot (2026-04-09 07:33:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13717933508 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Gift shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 10:33:14+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181451096
(Delete spam tags. First version)
NeisBot (2026-04-09 07:42:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/122273774 v7

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Card shop"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Kartenladen"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-17 10:33:18+00:00): 🤔 The text has been updated, though I’m not entirely sure it’s an improvement.
yelisey90 (2026-04-09 08:01:36+00:00): partly reverted wrt Public Service Hall: the Wikipedia article deals with all the PSHs in Georgia, not with this particular one. Only https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q136433302 deals with it in particular as of now
eggie (2026-04-09 10:56:55+00:00): Hoi,

Alle begin is lastig.
Zal je nog een welkomstmail sturen. 
Ik heb heb het aangepast met office=company
craft=cleaning

CTRL-F5 33n paar keer dan zie je wel effect. 
Groet,
eggie
eggie (2026-04-09 10:59:00+00:00): (Schoonmaakbedrijf) hoort denk ik niet in de naam te staan. Dat zit 'm in de craft=cleaning
AlbaireN (2026-06-04 13:39:58+00:00): Attention, il y a deux relations pour le Péiph'Vélo :
- une pour la partie du Périph'Vélo à l'état de projet 
- et une autre pour la partie du Périph'Vélo réalisée et ouverte.

Lors de l'ouverture de nouveaux tronçons du Périph'Vélo :
- ajouter les nouveaux morceaux du Périph'Vélo à la relation Périph'Vélo 
- les supprimer de la relation Périph'Vélo (en projet). 

Mais éviter de toucher aux tags de la relation Périph'Vélo et éviter d'avoir plusieurs relations Périph'Vélo.
Merci,
Albert
MappingMore (2026-04-09 11:25:50+00:00): Partially Revert of 181052988
Frans S (2026-04-10 13:19:30+00:00): Hi. I try to validate this task and noticed this building
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489279417/history#map=19/-18.152292/49.386171
You did not mention damage. However, there is no roof visible, meaning damaged
Best regards
Filip009 (2026-05-15 10:00:33+00:00): Neotagovaná cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1497865833
eggie (2026-04-09 10:35:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Je hebt onder het commentaar Poortugaal een weg verschoven naar de Groene Kruisweg????
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=181083934
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-09 10:37:18+00:00): De schade heb ik hersteld.
NieWnen (2026-04-09 19:33:56+00:00): Cześć,
dzięki za 1 zmianę w OSM.

Czy ta droga https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1497868123 istnieje fizycznie obok Zagajnikowej i jest czymś oddzielona? Np. płotem/pasem zieleni tj. da się stwierdzić, że biegną tu 2 drogi obok siebie, a nie 1?
Jeśli nie, to nie możemy tak duplikować dróg, a podział działek nie ma znaczenia.

Co do nazwy, to nie nadajemy ulicom bocznym nazwy od ul. głównej jeśli nie są tak uchwalone.

Co do ogr. prędkości, to również pytanie, czy jest tam już jakieś oznakowanie?
RadziejN1987 (2026-04-10 03:55:20+00:00): Cześć, droga oddzielona jest pasem zieleni o szerokości 2m oraz dużymi drzewami - które definiują szerokość pasa oddzielającego. 

Znak z ograniczeniem stoi przed wjazdem na tą drogę.
NieWnen (2026-04-13 20:11:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181274734
NeisBot (2026-04-09 08:24:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13718033794 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dental clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 10:33:23+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181451106
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
eggie (2026-04-09 10:51:19+00:00): Dag GE, De uitzonderingen tweewielers op oneway=yes heb ik verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
dufterbe (2026-04-19 12:37:11+00:00): Wieso soll class bike hier -1 und nicht +1 sein?
Herr Bause (2026-04-19 12:40:21+00:00): Hallo, welche Bearbeitung meist du genau?
NeisBot (2026-04-09 08:30:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1497869916 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1496865204 v8 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5488038156 v2
https://osm.org/node/13710218975 v2
https://osm.org/node/13710218976 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181084653
NeisReview (2026-04-17 10:33:30+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/181134336
t_ja (2026-07-26 17:46:39+00:00): Ahoj,
zaujímal by ma dôvod, prečo sú lesné/poľné cesty v tejto sade zmien označené "access=no". Toto územie nepatrí do CHKO Strážovské vrchy (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6757206) a tiež nie je zakreslený žiadny plot alebo aspoň závory/brány, ktoré by znemožnovali prístup na tieto cesty.
Vopred vďaka za odpoveď.
Mirecnet (2026-07-27 12:57:45+00:00): Nazdar,
kludne to oprav, ako by to dobre malo byt. Jasne, ze tam nie je zakazany pristup. Skor som to myslel tak, ze spodna cesta je lepsia na pristup ku skale. Nech ludia idu skor tadial. Je to lepsie...
Mirecnet (2026-07-27 12:58:44+00:00): Ozaj, este si spominam, ze tam bola znacka - sukromny podzemok - zakaz vstupu !
t_ja (2026-07-27 17:03:11+00:00): Pridal som "fixme" na tie cesty, snáď to niekto v budúcnosti upresní, ktoré časti sú súkromné a kde je voľný pohyb.
Vďaka ešte raz za info.
eggie (2026-04-09 10:47:28+00:00): De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.
MVG
eggie
yelisey90 (2026-04-09 08:59:21+00:00): rv - the address is present on the building

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181085987
NeisBot (2026-04-09 09:09:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 14 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1497869916 v2 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1496865204 v9 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13710358204 v2
https://osm.org/node/13710358203 v2
https://osm.org/node/13710218968 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181086247
NeisReview (2026-04-17 10:33:31+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/181134336
woodpeck_repair (2026-04-09 09:08:04+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 177654213, 178503343, 180602089, 180602650, 180602691, 180602879, 180867151, 180867250, 180867428, 180874519, 180884573, 180887746, 180887950, 180888091.
woodpeck (2026-04-09 09:09:24+00:00): I am aware that this changeset has also reverted some edits that *may* have been ok, but given the outrageously wrong edits made elsewhere by this mapper I don't think we should trust any of these.
Mechowskyy (2026-04-09 18:05:24+00:00): Wandalizacja
grzegorz75jan (2026-04-09 20:37:23+00:00): Mechowskyy jak dobrze pójdzie to dziadyga dostanie urlop za ten wybryk. Odpowiednie znaczniki poszły.
W razie problemów pisz najlepiej bezpośrednio nie jako zgłoszenie z poziomu strony danej podpadziochy tylko email na 
data @openstreetmap.org 
Więcej tu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181086461
eggie (2026-04-09 10:46:01+00:00): Dag ydmr, Je info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode.
Svp die voortaan gebruiken om bedrijven bij te taggen.

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2026-04-09 09:21:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13718125243 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Motorcycle tyres shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-17 10:33:25+00:00): 👍 Thank you for removing the text by https://osm.org/changeset/181254888
VLD0251 (2026-04-11 12:28:32+00:00): Hi, “Beni Maouche” refers to the entire commune (osm.org/relation/4070138) rather than an town. the administrative center is Trouna (osm.org/node/455500554). this entry is a duplicate of the existing administrative boundary. add the tag “alt_name=Beni Maouche” to improve searchability.

Happy Mapping !
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181086951
NeisBot (2026-04-09 09:27:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13718124840 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Travel agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 10:33:28+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181451111
(Delete spam tags. First version)
Frans S (2026-04-24 08:53:50+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. You are doing a remarkable job on this project.
However, please do not cluster buildings like here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1497881994/history#map=19/15.299516/32.544194

The correct tagging of a building under construction is 
Building=construction
Construction=building.

Best regards
JFL-75 (2026-04-24 09:23:56+00:00): Hi Frans S, Thanks for your suggestion. Just a remark with the proposed tag:  the issue with the definition proposed for buildings under construction  is the recursion because it implies building=building as the final product.
Regards
goldfndr (2026-04-09 11:57:29+00:00): https://www.peridotnailsalon.com/ seems responsive but wasn't signed outside.
rskedgell (2026-06-04 21:35:39+00:00): Why did you add a fictitious sidewalk to the E side of Pavilion Road, between Pont Street and Hans Street? #DWG

How exactly does your adding fictitious pedestrian infrastructure benefit me, as a walker or runner who actually lives in London.

See photo in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5326923
RahilPasha (2026-06-06 05:03:09+00:00): Hi rskedgell,

Thank you for your helpful feedback.
I've crated a continuous sidewalk connecting to both ends to avoid any hanging/dangling segments. Going forward, I'll ensure all edits are made in accordance with the SLI evidence.