piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ChehrehBargi (2023-10-30 18:47:42+00:00): باسلام و عرض خدا قوت
بعد از دیدن ثبت شما در این خیابان، و مطالعه ویکی متوجه شدم که از این برچسب می توان با کمی تغییر در مسیر خط ویژه استفاده کرد. لذا برچسبی که استفاده کردید با کمی اصلاح به motor_vehicle:conditional تبدیل و در مسیر خط ویژه ثبت گردید.
پایدار باشید
BharatRV5avB6N (2023-03-04 09:28:04+00:00): Welcome to join Openstreetmap(OSM)

Please to be sure to checking each building geometry generated by AI individually

It may to be inaccurate or not existed in reality, represented on aerial imagery such as Bing, Esri or Maxar

Please remove the features which not exist or inaccurate geometry, or fix the geometry of a feature, before uploading or publishing into the OSM

If you have doubt, you can ask the community of the OSM or read on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org

Thank you, happy mapping.
BharatRV5avB6N (2023-03-04 09:27:22+00:00): Welcome to join Openstreetmap(OSM)

Please to be sure to checking each building geometry generated by AI individually

It may to be inaccurate or not existed in reality, represented on aerial imagery such as Bing, Esri or Maxar

Please remove the features which not exist or inaccurate geometry, or fix the geometry of a feature, before uploading or publishing into the OSM

If you have doubt, you can ask the community of the OSM or read on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org

Thank you, happy mapping.
PerWiraUsaha (2023-03-04 09:33:47+00:00): Essenzo OKHerbalBanget Menyediakan Produk Kesehatan Berbahan Baku Dasar Terbuat Dari Tumbuhan Alami (Herbal) Merek Terdaftar BPOM & MUI Indonesia
xronos (2023-06-01 22:23:05+00:00): а почему Вы в очередной раз (который по счету?) Удалили полигон жилой застройки? Чем он так мешал? И какое отношение landuse=residential имеет к навигации?
xronos (2023-06-01 22:25:36+00:00): мы это уже пытались обсудить))

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99839875

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83420726
xronos (2023-06-01 22:26:27+00:00): И ещё надо вернуться к обсуждению той тропинке в Лисьем Носу от кладбища через ЖД
Константин Гам (2023-06-01 23:13:51+00:00): Полигон заливающий все мешает пониманию где ты. 
Спасибо, что напомнили, почерчу на досуге
xronos (2023-06-02 11:44:16+00:00): как это заливающий всё? Он заливает ровно то что в его границах. А если он мешает навигации — может Вам поменять рендерер, навигатор, карту? Зачем портить то что другим людям не мешает? И практика "удалю а потом когда-нибудь нарисую" осуждается сообществом.

можете восстановить как было?

а когда сделаете лучше — замените
bxl-forever (2023-03-04 11:18:52+00:00): Isn’t it a duplicate of this one?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/634187532

Just in case: the OsmAnd~ app uses an offline map, so you have to download an update every now and then, otherwise you map want to add objects that are already on the map.
You can activate the "Live updates" to get a fresh copy.

To update, you can do: Menu > Download maps > Updates > Live updates > Belgium > Update now
Dylan Van Assche (2023-03-04 12:58:55+00:00): Yeah I noticed that, I enabled live updates now. I also removed the duplicate nodes.
bxl-forever (2023-03-04 11:15:07+00:00): Isn’t it a duplicate of this one?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6742596577
Dylan Van Assche (2023-03-04 12:55:59+00:00): Hmmm OSMAnd didn't show those... Will remove the duplicates.
bxl-forever (2023-03-04 11:19:34+00:00): Hello,

Medi-Market is not a pharmacy but a para-pharmacy.  There are important legal differences because they are not allowed to sell prescription drugs.  They should be tagged as shop=chemist in OSM.

Example here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5266682350
Dylan Van Assche (2023-03-04 12:52:11+00:00): Hi,

This one does though, you can go through a sliding door to the part where they sell prescription drugs. So they are actually both.
relaemanila (2023-03-04 09:41:30+00:00): Changeset rewrite: [Sibulan, Negros Oriental] Add a boundary
Nakaner-repair (2024-03-07 12:59:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148340823 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by 'babis b' because they were uploaded using MAPS.ME, look suspicious (ATM on roads) and the user is unresponsive.
M!dgard (2025-01-24 09:26:04+00:00): Idem als in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147547762#comments
Jakka (2025-01-24 10:00:12+00:00): V bijgewerkt
M!dgard (2025-01-24 10:30:05+00:00): Top, merci!
user_6110846 (2023-03-04 10:01:24+00:00): the polygon was included in the change for unknown reasons
limes11 (2023-03-04 13:46:25+00:00): Hi,

what is this exactly? The webpage is dead, there is no such thing as demolished:name and demolished=yes without main tag does not make sense (and is deprecated).

If you try to restore the history, please use valid and meaningful tags and verify you edits.

Thanks

Limes
emvee (2023-03-06 22:47:03+00:00): I did not invent this myself, I followed what was done for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25764140

demolished is a supported tag, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished:* and I think it adds here value in the sense that I found this searching for campings and now know they are gone because of the flood.
limes11 (2023-03-07 17:36:01+00:00): So I cleaned this up for you. 

It certainly has its value to add the  history of these places but should be done with an adequate sense of rigor.

demolished=yes was introduced earlier. That wasn't great but at least it still had the main campsite-tag, so it did make sense back then.

demolished is of course a supported prefix for anything that can be physically demolished like a building. How can one demolish a name ?

It is never a good idea to put websites without checking them, in particular, not in this area.

Anyways, should be fine now! Let's hope some of these places will be reopened eventually.
emvee (2023-03-09 13:10:07+00:00): Good you found a way that looks clean to you and also indicate this was a campings which is gone because of the flood, I am fine with it.

Thanks.
BharatRV5avB6N (2023-03-04 10:22:25+00:00): Please take time to view your edit that published into OSM that added from mapwithai data, and make the improve of geometry or remove it if there are not exist

Thank you for cooperation.
mueschel (2023-03-11 13:30:10+00:00): Hi,
please check this way, it didn't get proper tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1151187873
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-02 16:46:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521910502/history  was it supposed to be service=alley ?
mataharimau (2023-03-10 04:45:21+00:00): Hi Peter, tq for your contributions.

Is there any reason you marked your hiking trail as natural = tree_row ? OSM defines this tag as "A line of trees". From the example pictures, it refers to a single row of trees along a pathway. I believe the trees along this path are not "single row" but represent "the edge of the forest". Someone else has already tagged the entire area as landuse = forest, so the tag natural = tree_row is somewhat misleading and redundant.
mataharimau (2023-03-10 04:47:54+00:00): I would use the following tags instead:
highway=path
surface=dirt
mataharimau (2023-03-10 04:51:58+00:00): I don't include

motor_vehicle=no

because the definition of highway=path is that it is too narrow for motor vehicles to enter.
mataharimau (2023-03-10 04:56:05+00:00): I don't include

bicycle=no

for terrains deemed unsuitable for bicycle. Let the bicyclists determine for themselves whether suitable or not.

This tag actually refers to park rules whereby the park forbids bicycles to be ridden on this path. (You see a signboard that says no bicycles allowed).
mataharimau (2023-03-10 04:57:29+00:00): I don't include

horse=no

unless there is an actual park rule and signboard that says no horses allowed.
Patr1k_P (2023-03-05 13:30:31+00:00): tu sa ti stalo ze si pridal prazdnym bodom source https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133283653 to su tie modre body...cize si mal nejakym sposobom oznacenych vela budov (su to body napr. aj na budove) a pridal si tag

stava sa ti to aj v dalsich changesetoch

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133291207

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133301881
Patr1k_P (2023-03-05 13:33:01+00:00): ale vlastne si na to asi dosiel a poopravoval si to
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
BharatRV5avB6N (2023-03-04 10:44:31+00:00): Here is some hint to provide example to tell you how to verify the data of building footprint from mapwithai or RapiD editor, and make correction or remove it if you can't make sure its accurateness or not exist in reality, when necessary 

https://osmcha.org/changesets/133282448/
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
❤️‍🔥 (2023-03-05 10:05:57+00:00): Hi, 4 years ago someone updated this track, saying "Track closed - Kauri dieback". 

So I think it's appropriate that the track is marked as access=no
simonschaufi (2023-03-05 10:53:12+00:00): I was walking this track recently and didn't see any junction that goes off from the big Kauri tree. I'm just afraid to delete it without any discussion as I might have missed it but there was only bush and no glimpse of another way leading somewhere else.
❤️‍🔥 (2023-03-05 11:18:34+00:00): because the track closed more than 4 years ago, I think it's plausable that there are very few traces left 

Instead of deleting a feature, another option is to change the tag `highway=path` to `was:highway=path`. This way, anyone who edits here in the future can see the history of the path and any previous discussions

To do this you'll need to use the advanced tag editor in the bottom left corner after you select the track. 

background info: https://wiki.osm.org/Lifecycle_prefix
simonschaufi (2023-03-07 08:56:05+00:00): Cool, it's always great to learn more about the tags. Thank you!
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Las Wolski (2023-05-21 17:08:13+00:00): Szanowny Panie Tytusie, wydaje mi się, że w zmianie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133284070 przeciągnął Pan punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2938802183/history w niewłaściwe miejsce i ścieżki przechodziły przez blok Armii Krajowej 81. Niestety ale bug rozszedł się na Organic Maps i mapy.cz.
Ale pozwoliłem sobie przestawić punkt we właściwe miejsce i w OSM już jest naprawione.
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
bxl-forever (2023-03-04 11:09:07+00:00): Nice work to update the shops and businesses here.

I admin doing edits with OsmAnd is complicated, because there is a little issue here:

The building was tagged as a computer shop.
You added the new activity: tax advisor.  Fine, but since a tax advisor is in the "office" category, adding the office tag does not remove the "shop=computer" tag… and now the building is mapped as being both an office and a computer shop.
Your next step is to remove shop=computer.

While you are at it, I suggest the following action:
1) Is 100% of the building used for the tax advisor activity?  If yes, you can leave the office tags on the building.
2) If no, it’s better to create a single point floating inside the building, and put the office tag and the name onto it, while the building outline keeps building=house and the addr:* tags.

Hope this helps.
Dylan Van Assche (2023-03-04 12:55:17+00:00): Thanks :) I tried out OSMAnd on the street to do this. 

The building is only like a tax advisor office (they offer administration support etc.). There are some apartments above though.

Because of that, this should be better a point and a regular building. I was really wondering what the difference was.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
bxl-forever (2023-03-04 11:02:23+00:00): If it is closed, do not only remove the name, but change this tag too:

shop=department_store

(I suggest changing "shop" into "was:shop", that will help future mappers to understand the situation… and will prevent others to recreate it if they map from memory or from outdated pictures.)
Dylan Van Assche (2023-03-04 12:53:44+00:00): Ah okay! I applied this change, thanks a lot!
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
eggie (2023-03-04 11:31:54+00:00): Dag Marije....   Je adres heeft niet het juiste format en ontbeert ook de woonplaats.. Kijk even op de adresnode van de woning.

Eigenlijk is het adres op de woning voldoende op iets te vinden in OSM.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133284829
MVG
eggie
MarijkeMe (2023-03-04 19:47:37+00:00): Dag Eggie,
Bedankt. Weer wat geleerd. Ik heb het adres weggehaald. Kennelijk werkt het niet goed om via de app organic maps te wijzigen? Je hebt daar geen vraag om de plaats.

Er komt best veel bij kijken merk ik. Zijn er ook wel eens fysieke bijeenkomsten van mappers?

mvg

Marijke
eggie (2023-03-04 20:03:40+00:00): Dag Marijke...  'k Denk dat je bent vergeten te 'uploaden'.  Nu even zelf adres verwijderd. Het is niet nodig hier.


Bijeenkomsten zijn een zeldzaamheid. Niet structureel.
Voor de brandweer zijn er wel eens instructies geweest en voor Missingmaps (Rode Kruis). Die mappen ook in OSM. 
Soms wordt dat op middelbare scholen gedaan.  Maar dan is het een specifiek doel. 

https://tasks.hotosm.org/

Wel een 2 maandelijkse zoombijeenkomst.
Daar is iedereen welkom en de drempel is laag.
Nog niet druk bezocht, maar probeer het eens.
Even dit draadje in de gaten houden. Daar komen de mededelingen.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/zaterdag-25-februari-online-community-bijeenkomst/4467

MVG
eggie
MarijkeMe (2023-03-04 20:13:18+00:00): Dank je, ik dacht dat ik het verwijderd en geupload had, sorry. Dank voor je 'draadje'. Ik zal proberen het in de gaten te houden. Fijn weekend,
Marijke
mavl (2023-04-23 15:47:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
antonr (2023-03-04 19:04:02+00:00): Hej Thomsen1352,

Velkommen til OpenStreetMap!

Du skriver "bom" i din changeset-kommentar, men der er indikeret barrier=gate, som nærmere er en låge i et hegn[1].

Jeg tror at kombinationen barrier=gate + locked=yes fortolkes som at der er spærret for fodgængere/cyklister.

Hvis der i virkeligheden er en bom er det måske mere passende med barrier=swing_gate[2], og hvis der er adgang for fodgængere/cyklister, vil foot=yes, bicycle=yes også være gode.

Mvh
antonr

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier=gate
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dswing_gate
Thomsen1352 (2023-03-04 19:11:30+00:00): Hej antonv, 

Tak jeg er enig og laver en opdatering.

Mvh
Thomsen1352
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
szabozoltan69 (2023-03-14 11:18:36+00:00): Is it possible to make these points public?
bkil (2023-03-14 12:39:03+00:00): Köszönjük a közreműködést! These are built-up compost heaps partially enclosed within a wooden box, right? I would like to suggest that we start using recycling:compost=yes together with composting=yes for this. "recycling:Komposzt" is not British English. "recycling:green_waste" is a bit better, but it would imply that people should gather their green waste here and that it would be taken away (for aromatic extraction or burning) later on, but it would not imply that it will be left here for years to compost. https://wiki.osm.org/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling https://taginfo.osm.org/keys/recycling%3Acompost#values
szabozoltan69 (2023-03-14 13:44:12+00:00): Thanks for the comments. Changes are done. (green_waste remained, because otherwise these points were showing up as a recycle bin)
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
aTarom (2023-12-13 11:32:33+00:00): Hola Seraq, una consulta, cuando colocas el tag
"incline"="up"
estás teniendo en cuenta la dirección de como está dibujada la vía?
por ejemplo
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1151198086/history
empieza en 3300m aprox. baja progresivamente y acaba en 2970m aprox.
puedes verlo con la capa raster del IGN,
por lo que es claramente
"incline"="down"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:incline
Hay muchas de este estilo en tus ediciones de hace años hasta esta de hace pocos meses.
Si tienes cualquier duda o estoy equivocado en algo, me dices y vemos como se puede solucionar revisarlas y corregirlas todas
Saludos
Seraq (2023-12-13 15:12:43+00:00): Hola a Tarom,

Es un error de etiquetado que cometí hace años. Lo voy corrigiendo a medida que me las voy encontrando. 

Habría que eliminarlas de todas mis ediciones, pero no ser como hacerlo…

Un saludo cordial,

Seraq
aTarom (2023-12-13 15:29:47+00:00): Perfecto!! gracias por contestar, me encargo hoy mismo de gran parte que se seguro detectar unas 3000 aprox. y las elimino. Para las pocas que queden también lo miraré y si son más de las esperadas te pediré ayuda para resolverlas fácilmente.
Saludos
Hugoren Martinako (2023-12-13 15:49:37+00:00): Hola Seraq,

Te facilito una consulta overpass relacionada: busca highways con incline en los que tu usuario ha sido el último en editar: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1EK2

No cubrirá todos los casos, pero aparecen bastantes. Luego puedes modificar esa misma consulta por si quisieras buscar otros etiquetados similares.

Saludos
aTarom (2023-12-13 16:23:01+00:00): De momento, eliminadas 1377 ways con "incline"="up" que no se corresponden con las elevaciones de terreno, editadas por tu usuario.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145080803
Sabiendo que no sigues añadiendo por defecto incline=up ya es un avance importante, consulta cualquier duda con la comunidad, saludos
Seraq (2023-12-13 18:48:02+00:00): Muchas gracias Hugoren Martinako
aTarom (2023-12-14 08:53:06+00:00): Eliminadas las 246 restantes "ocultas" por ediciones posteriores y que no coinciden con el terreno
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145101656
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-04 11:20:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10709139736

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-04 11:23:08+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 133075125, 133075768, 133076099, 133076662, 133077505, 133077840, 133077905, 133078271, 133078644, 133079474, 133079628, 133082900, 133083339, 133083405, 133084567, 133084689, 133085223, 133096112, 133096524.
Bienson (2023-03-05 00:02:55+00:00): Changesets revertiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133309800

Die Situation ist korrekt dargestellt, mit access=private wird der Zufahrtsweg nicht für's Routing verwendet. Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109966883

Zusätzlich sind an den Toren/Barrieren ebenfalls access=private eingetragen.
ToniE (2023-03-04 11:30:56+00:00): Servus,

weiß du, ob der 263er Bus, ... wieder die gewohnte Strecke über die Brücke fährt?

Gruß
Toni
ToniE (2023-03-04 11:34:54+00:00): Selber nachschauen hilft: Ja ab 6.3. gibt es für den 263 und 263V einen neuen Fahrplan (bis 30.4., danach einen weiteren - anderen?)