piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Shaun das Schaf (2023-05-18 09:05:32+00:00): Hi, du meinst wahrscheinlich diesen Turm hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28276929

Du hattest allerdings bei der Kirche Sankt Nicolai den von mir genannten Tag geändert: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905396453/history

Hier kannst du deine Änderungen auch nochmal übersichtlich betrachten:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=136201488

Wahrscheinlich nur ein Versehen :-)
In dem Fall bitte wieder rückgängig machen und auf "roof:shape=gabled" setzen. Wenn du Hilfe brauchst, gerne melden.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
kubahahaha (2023-11-24 07:13:25+00:00): Cześć
te okopy to czytelne zagłębienia w ziemi, czy naprawdę znajduje się tam pomnik?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10904671241

Jeżeli nie ma pomnika, a widać jaki był przebieg wykopów, to lepiej to oznaczyć linią z tagiem barrier=ditch tak jak np. tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/50.60701/23.01118

Pzdr
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-20 18:08:02+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10904687644/history has shop = eye_glasses that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=eye_glasses ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it maybe shop=optician ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=optician Maybe shop=sunglasses if it sell nothing correcting eye deformities?
Taya_S (2023-05-17 09:43:46+00:00): Hello, please do be careful. You just removed an area that was previously heath and you placed 3 intermittend water areas in to the Dwingeloosche Heide MP which were purposely left out.
Taya_S (2023-05-17 09:45:13+00:00): *4 areas, not 3 my mistake
Taya_S (2023-05-17 16:06:30+00:00): I resolved the issues here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136219883
kartler175 (2023-05-17 17:20:44+00:00): A water area, intermittent or not, is not a heath area. That is why it should be exluded as inner member.
kartler175 (2023-05-17 17:45:36+00:00): If you mean the area enclosed by http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1v4W :  It neither had a connection to the heath area nor was it defined as such.
Taya_S (2023-05-17 18:17:43+00:00): Hello,

> A water area, intermittent or not, is not a heath area.
I'm afraid thats incorrect. In the winter this area is usually under water, but in the summer its just heathland. 

>  It neither had a connection to the heath area nor was it defined as such.
What I mean is that while I appreaciate you fixing issues, please do make sure not to alter the way things were mapped.

- Taya
gurglypipe (2023-05-17 10:03:20+00:00): Hi, can you perhaps go into a bit more detail about why this is a good change and why the previous mapping was incorrect?

If people now search OSM for “langdale pikes”, they won’t find this area, despite that being a commonly used name for it and it being a popular area to visit. That feels like a loss to OSM.

Thanks
gurglypipe (2023-05-18 10:35:40+00:00): I’ve reverted these changes (as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136248127), since the area is definitely referred to as the Langdale Pikes, and there needs to be some way on OSM to reflect that.

If you have ideas for how to improve the tagging please go ahead, but I think the way needs to stay there to associate the name ‘Langdale Pikes’ with the area.

Cheers
auxbuss (2023-05-18 20:08:57+00:00): Fair enough.

One problem I see is that there are hundreds of such local labels in the Lake District alone. If all of these were added to OSM, then they would overwhelm the map, and interfere with the more important data of features on the ground. That said, I suppose it is the responsibility of the displaying tool to determine what should be shown at what zoom level.

Furthermore, imo, the Langdale Pikes is a collection of hills/tops, and not an area – and certainly not a natural feature – so laying down a border for it is inappropriate on a map.
gurglypipe (2023-05-19 09:42:10+00:00): As you say, I think whether/how to display the label is a rendering question, not an issue with the dataset itself, although I see your point. The Lake District is very heavily labelled.

I can see your point about it being a collection of hills rather than an area. The tagging as natural=mountain_range doesn’t seem wrong to me, but I guess an alternative would be to add a relation containing all the relevant hill tops and label that instead. Perhaps a type=site relation would be appropriate?
Patrickov (2023-05-19 01:38:33+00:00): Route relations should have their members ordered in a specific way.  Also, ways being visited twice or more should be included multiple times.

Yes, it's tedious, which is why iD is not a good tool to add bus routes.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dbus
Patrickov (2023-05-21 07:54:00+00:00): Two more things.
1.  "name" of all objects in Hong Kong should be bilingual, unless you cannot find the name in one of the languages.
2.  "forward" and "backward" should be with respect to the way.  The way iD shows direction is misleading -- we should follow the *opposite* its "shadow" shows us.
adiatmad (2023-05-19 04:23:43+00:00): Hi Frans, layer=1 should be used, correct?
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1147144321)
Frans S (2023-05-19 07:30:03+00:00): Yes, In this case, you see a dome on a big building. I added a layer=1 to it because it is on top of that building.
When I don't add it, it gives an error for a 'building in a building'.
Normally we only map the footprint; but this was already mapped, so I added this layer.
When mappers work in Ideditor, a building only project, where the roads are already mapped, it happens that buildings need to be mapped over a road. This also gives an error. Often a mapper solve this by adding a layer to that building. This is not the way it should be done, but they cannot move the road a bit aside. In JOSM you can, So validators working in JOSM also.
Validators take care of those issues.
Best regards
adiatmad (2023-05-19 08:18:59+00:00): Thanks for the detailed explanation! Now I have a better understanding of how to use the tag "layer=*" on the existing object. Appreciate it! Best regards.
Frans S (2023-05-19 12:16:41+00:00): Common use is when a road crosses a bridge,  Layer=1 added to the road where the bridge is mapped. 2 nodes where the bridge start and end.
culvert: added to the river, where the culvert is mapped under the road.
Layer= -1
 
Fly over at roads. add nodes on a piece of the road where it fly over another piece of road. add tag layer= 1. 

best regards
seattlefyi (2023-05-19 04:48:09+00:00): Hi, thanks for updating your business on the map, though I needed to fix the change so the business shows up in the right area -- generally nodes with addresses should stay where they are, so you'd remove any non-address tags from the old place, and add them to an object in the new place. Again, I already made a change, just letting you know. Thanks again!
pio2_122 (2023-05-17 12:46:32+00:00): Zgodnie z dobrymi praktykami OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki#Nie_mapuj_tymczasowych_wydarze%C5%84_i_tymczasowych_obiekt%C3%B3w) nie mapuje się tymczasowych wydarzeń - zwłaszcza jednodniowych jak w tym przypadku.
Uralla (2023-05-17 10:26:32+00:00): Зачем в объекте "тропа" в названии писать тропа?
Enock4seth (2023-05-17 12:25:55+00:00): How sure are you the this connecting exist?
ElLlobregatRiver (2023-05-18 08:37:04+00:00): Thank you Enock4seth for your message. Based on aerial imagery it appears a connection exists, but analyzing it again there is not 100% clarity that it is car navigable. I have removed the connection based on this.
Enock4seth (2023-05-26 14:45:41+00:00): This kind of mapping is very bad!! There are already enough useless roads from your team in Ghana. Please stop it!!!!!!
maraf24 (2023-05-17 09:57:18+00:00): Niestety, tak często wygląda mapowanie z ISOK.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-04 08:10:29+00:00): Hello!

You used
colour=weiß
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10904742544/history

Have you maybe meant
colour=white
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Abdullahjan999 (2024-02-23 12:24:30+00:00): Waseef Labor Accommodation
Baraka Jungwa (2024-02-23 12:32:18+00:00): Thanks!
PlaneMad (2023-10-12 15:30:20+00:00): Hi nice work mapping Gangapur city!
grzegorz75jan (2024-04-22 19:16:50+00:00): Zrobiłem małą przeróbkę. Punkt zmieniłem na obszar i dodałem linki. Poproszę o namiar na film oraz sprawdzenie lokalizacji bo punkt początkowy był deko na północ a z cieniowania wyszło mi tu.
dominikzonthebike (2024-04-24 06:47:59+00:00): Położenie może być, punkt zaznaczany był na telefonie więc nie wykluczam przesunięcia o kilka metrów ale to bez znaczenia. Widać go tu tak gdzieś od 1:30:
https://youtu.be/8ZAfsbX9vEg?si=GGglryiLmHjCJIZI
grzegorz75jan (2024-04-24 22:44:29+00:00): Dzięki temu wiem czy to co widzę na podkładzie cieniowania gra z rzeczywistością. Moje ślady gps z telefonu i licznika w lesie (nawet już bez liści) i nie tylko robią takie numery, że muszę robić nowe i nanosić korekty albo najczęściej uśredniać czyli często niby nawet pinezka gra a nie gra. Gdy robię sam i w znanym mi miejscu to mam lepsze odniesienie, porównanie.

Czyli tu mamy raczej symboliczny grób, mogiłę oraz pomnik. Mój obrys być może w miarę pokrywa się z tym co tam faktycznie jest. Pomnik może kiedyś dodam w wolnym czasie.

W mojej okolicy jest miejsce kaźni i pochówku gdzie są groby symboliczne częściowo pokrywające się faktycznymi. Dodatkowo około sześć jest nieoznaczonych i tak naprawdę nawet odwiedzający "Żymianie" czy Polacy chodzą sami nie wiedząc do końca  po czym. 
https://zapomniane.org/miejsce/zbylitowska-gora/
No ale pan rabin z przekąsem nie omieszkał zwrócić uwagę, że nie dobra robić remont bez jego nadzoru ale rozumiem, że deptać można po ichniemu
https://web.archive.org/web/20160122095817/http://www.gmina.tarnow.pl/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=172:trwa-remont-mogiy-dziecicej-w-lesie-buczyna.

Widziałem na mapie parę twoich pomników ale są widoczne w OSM i to dopiero pod edytorem jako niebieskie punkty. Kiedyś sprawdzę czy np. mapy.cz je widzi. 

teraz doktoryzowanie z czystego powietrza i wyboru ogrzewania bo gazownia robi pod górkę a z samym paliwem gazowym ciężko powiedzieć jak będzie faktycznie dalej. Za dużo tego wszystkiego.
pitfire (2023-05-17 10:47:33+00:00): Hallo staka-RBK_04,
Tipp
würde "informal" ganz löschen. "No" ist mit 4.11% kaum verbreitet und neue User suchen sich einen Wolf, an einer Erklärung :-)
Gruß pitfire
staka-RBK_04 (2023-05-17 11:44:12+00:00): Hallo pitfire,
vielen Dank für den Tipp! Habe den Tag jetzt komplett rausgenommen.
Grüße staka_RBK_04
Enock4seth (2023-05-17 12:21:21+00:00): you are representing  "MSJ Advertising" several objects. Is the footway also owned by the you? 

Kindly delete the point and ways, only use one object to represent a feature; either a point or polygon, and that footpath isn't named after so remove the name too.
Lejun (2023-05-17 19:34:45+00:00): Pourquoi avoir nommé un chemin « Théo » ?
AtiGroupe (2023-05-17 22:31:02+00:00): Bonjour, c'était, un test. Merci, je vais le supprimer.
Lejun (2023-05-18 07:14:46+00:00): Ça roule, surtout hésitez pas si y a besoin d'aide !
HellMap (2023-05-17 12:05:35+00:00): Hi!

Thanks for adding details to the crossing!

I noticed you specified that there is tactile paving on this crossing. `tactile_paving=yes` on a line should only be used if there is a continuous tactile paving along it. That is - the usually yellow bumpy strip across the road. A person using the paving would be able to follow it for the whole length when crossing. But there are almost no places in Latvia with such crossing tactile paving. This crossing too doesn't have such a strip even though there is tactile paving on both kerbs.

(I should mention that the rule is a bit different for the point of the crossing, that is, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3313981781, where `tactile_paving=yes` can be specified when there is tactile paving just at the kerbs. Someone can still use this tactile paving to find the edges of the crossing, even if there isn't any across.)

I fixed this example.

Thanks

P.S. Let me know if I should use Latvian to communicate.
joost schouppe (2023-05-17 10:08:48+00:00): Clicked too soon, the changeset comment was supposed to be: Discussed by e-mail to community@osm.be - misunderstanding about tagging
eggie (2023-05-17 19:02:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Het speeltoestel en de picnic_tabel heb ik uit elkaar gehaald hier. One feature ... one element. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
MilvusVos (2023-05-18 05:50:54+00:00): Ja, fijn!
Dat was inderdaad ook mijn bedoeling, bedankt!
maraf24 (2023-05-17 10:58:47+00:00): Zmiany wycofane.
Константин Гам (2023-06-05 22:15:21+00:00): Опять 25, данный ЖК ещё строится, огорожен, жителей нет.
Hb- (2025-07-30 13:51:05+00:00): Du hattest hier oneway:bicycle=yes für den Fahrradweg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1167634306 westlich der Brücke mit OSM-Richtung Norden gesetzt. Vermutlich ist die Richtung falsch. Ich werde das umdrehen.
user_5359 (2023-05-18 16:17:27+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/454682584. What is the mean of the tag roo:a = 30 (perhaps roof:angle=30)?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-17 10:40:35+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2085825023
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1082359636

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
tyr_asd (2023-08-28 08:49:37+00:00): Ähm, access=no ist hier im Moment schon gerechtfertigt, weil das ja noch eine große Baustelle ist (siehe http://jauntal.netzcam.net/).
christiank61 (2023-08-28 13:21:30+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis - Hmm, dann muss man aber für den Radweg der darüber läuft auch eine Umleitung eintragen...
BTW: wieso dismount und access=no ?
Egal...
tyr_asd (2023-08-28 13:45:37+00:00): Die Umleitung führt offenbar über die Brücke der B80a (https://www.drauradwegwirte.at/images/%C3%9CLP_Umleitung_R1_Drauradweg.pdf) und ist höchstwahrscheinlich lokal ausgeschildert. Da die Baustelle nicht mehr sehr lange dauern wird, finde ich könnte man das bis dahin schon so gemappt lassen. ;)

bicycle=dismount war offenbar die Regelung wie der Weg unter der Brücke vor dem Neubau für Fahrradfahrer nutzbar war (ich nehme an weil er recht schmal war). Aber du hast recht: Zusammen mit dem access=no war das Tag nicht korrekt. Hatte vorhin das "dismount" Tag mit dem "construction"-Prefix versehen, aber da ich auch nicht genau weiß wie die Situation nach der Eröffnung genau sein wird, ist es wahrscheinlich besser es ganz zu entfernen.
ALu68 (2023-05-18 08:57:58+00:00): Hallo PhilippAugsburg,

Die Relation "Universität Augsburg" https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7359067 müsste nur die allgemeinen Angaben (Namen, wiki*) ohne Adresse beinhalten.

Teil der Relation wäre dann "Alte Universität" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82950002/history - Version #6.
https://www.uni-augsburg.de/de/services/lageplan/standort-alte-universitat/

Die beiden Wege https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446385611 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/689917155 müssten dann auch zu einem MP "Campus" zusammen gefasst werden. Keine Keys an den einzelnen Wegen.
https://www.uni-augsburg.de/de/services/lageplan/standort-campus/

Außerdem kommen dann noch die Standorte "Medizincampus" & "Grottenau" hinzu.
https://www.uni-augsburg.de/de/services/lageplan/standort-medizin/

https://www.uni-augsburg.de/de/services/lageplan/

Gruß. Andre
PhilippAugsburg (2023-05-18 14:30:44+00:00): Hallo Andre
da stimme ich dir voll zu allerdings weiß ich aktuell nicht wie man das machen müsste 😜

Vg
Philipp
ALu68 (2023-05-18 21:01:01+00:00): Habs jetzt mal mit den Standorten der Uni so gemacht https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7359067 , 

wobei ich ich jetzt auch nicht weiß, wie mit der zweiten Relation mit den einzelnen Gebäuden umzugehen ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/399723
BCNorwich (2023-05-18 06:56:13+00:00): Hi, The house numbers on Barlow Road near Cleveland Avenue don't look right, some are duplicated. I think the corner house numbered 63 should be changed to 67. Then 65 should be 69, 67 should be 71, and so on up to 77. Please also note that there should then only be 6 houses on the frontage of Barlow Road, currently, there are 7 mapped, 1 to many. 

If you agree, please make amendments, or I can do so if you wish. I await your response.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2023-05-29 07:33:51+00:00): Thank you.
eggie (2023-05-17 11:07:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Je had het adres helemaal verwijderd. Ik heb de adresnode hersteld.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
wvdp (2023-05-17 10:55:26+00:00): I want to thank Dalfsenaartje for all the work he put into the Ada's Hoeve.

And I also want to apologize to him for destroying some of his work. 

I truly believe I made the area better and more maintainable.
Mounika holesime (2023-05-20 03:38:44+00:00): Tq
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-06-02 10:01:06+00:00): نرجوا منكم الرد على الاستفسار المذكور في التغيير السابق لاسم هذا الشارع:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113008790
eggie (2023-05-17 18:38:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback..  één fitness staat op de adresnode. Dat is prima. Wellicht weet je ook op welk adres de andere fitness hoort. Als meer bedrijven één adres delen is het schipperen en is het zo oke.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
silversurfer83 (2023-05-19 12:55:26+00:00): Hi
Das heißt es gibt ein Verkehrszeichen, welches für die beiden von Dir geänderten Streckenabschnitte gilt, welches die Durchfahrt für alle Fzg schwerer als 12t verbietet? Eine Bezeichnung wie K oder L (Kreis bzw. Landstraße) hast Du vielleicht auch gesehen?
Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136207823
silversurfer83 (2023-05-20 15:07:33+00:00): Gude
Weißt du, ob dort ein Schild das maximal zulässige Gewicht beschränkt?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136207823
Freiberufler (2023-05-20 17:54:58+00:00): Ich werde beim nächste mal darauf achten und es ggf. an dem Ort hinzufügen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136207823
silversurfer83 (2023-05-20 18:13:54+00:00): Danke :)
CoyKoi (2023-05-17 20:07:14+00:00): Hi TinTin, welcome to OSM editing, thank you for your contributions.
The `surface` tag is intended for the surface of highways (roads, tracks, paths). For a building, the tag you are looking for is `building:material`

Check the OSMWiki it is the reference for tags: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:material
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136208088
Snusmumriken (2023-05-17 12:08:19+00:00): Hej nollr8, kul att du börjat mappa kring Täby. Jag skulle bara vilja komma med en kommentar. Jag ser att du använder iD editorn. Tyvärr så kommer den med rekommendationer som inte passar så bra med hur vi mappar busshållplatser i SL-området. Så jag skulle vilja be att du bara ignorerar dessa rekommendationer.
piotrekc64 (2023-05-17 11:47:10+00:00): dodatkowo kod pocztowy powinien być 21-002 (poczta Jastków)
piotrekc64 (2023-05-17 12:05:49+00:00): Dodam, że właśnie dzwoniłem do Urzędu Gminy Jastków i na geoportalu pomyłka zostanie również poprawiona.
hrhino (2023-05-17 13:30:03+00:00): Hi EricWarren, and thanks for the addition! My one requested change would be that phone numbers in OSM are supposed to be in "international format", which here would be "+1 802-457-3291".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136209507
EricWarren (2023-05-17 14:19:18+00:00): Thank you for the feedback.  I will be sure to use proper formatting in future edits.
Shaun das Schaf (2023-05-17 19:40:30+00:00): Hallo nervnicht, willkommen bei OSM!

Bitte nutze den name-Tag nur für den tatsächlichen Namen eines Objekts, nicht als Beschreibung. Siehe auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Ich vermute mal, das dieser Kiosk hier nicht wirklich "Getränke, Zigaretten, DHL und Handybedarf" heißt, oder?

Bitte ggf. noch korrigieren. Bei Fragen natürlich gerne melden.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
murble (2023-05-22 10:30:06+00:00): Hi tjwyork, thanks for doing all these building outlines & numbers etc, but can you look at the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels Overlay as your building alignment appears a little off.
thanks
bill
ftcat (2023-05-18 09:18:40+00:00): Could I ask how often you have visited Central Police Station? It is definitely not wheelchair accessible. Please don't guess these sort of features. You are mapping as if you are actually visiting the places and there is no way you are
charles chilufya (2023-05-18 09:43:49+00:00): Hi ftcat,  it has two entrance, where vehicles passes, is very accessible by security. Thank you
ftcat (2023-05-18 10:50:09+00:00): Please tell me how you would gain access to the building in a wheelchair let alone get to the upper floors.
mga_geo (2023-05-21 18:55:13+00:00): Bonsoir,
Suite à vos modifications, les deux relations bus TBK sont cassées.
Pouvez-vous réparer s'il vous plait ?
Marc
MacDony (2023-05-22 05:40:08+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous pouvez me préciser à quels endroits se situent les parties cassées, merci
Denis
MacDony (2023-05-22 06:15:04+00:00): Re,
Je pense que le problème se situe au niveau du sens unique ici:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?relation=13287919#map=18/47.86904/-3.55977
Je ne pense pas que le bus prenne un sens interdit
le trajet a dû être modifié, je pense
Mais bon, je peux me tromper
Denis
NieWnen (2023-05-17 12:50:41+00:00): *pętli
SomeoneElse (2023-05-17 13:09:18+00:00): Hello,
I can probably guess "SAU" (Saudi Arabia) and "YEM" (Yemen) here, but what are "GHSL" and "EC" here?  "add villages and details" is of course perfectly descriptive.
Best Regards,
Andy
Seandebasti (2023-05-25 06:10:07+00:00): Hello, thanks for asking. You are totally right. According to ISO 3166-2 alpha 3 it is the abbreviation for these two countries. According to the a simple humanic search in the world wide web "GHSL EC" is 100% related to https://ghsl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ Could you provide a list of allowed abbreviations for changeset description?
Thanks
SomeoneElse (2023-05-25 09:35:52+00:00): > Could you provide a list of allowed abbreviations for changeset description? 
No.  You have 255 characters in a changeset comment - please use those to explain your changes.
"https://ghsl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/" is just a website.  What does it have to do with your changes here?
Seandebasti (2023-05-26 12:07:17+00:00): A web map service, like from GHSL, which shows where settlements are, is useful to look for missing residential areas.
SomeoneElse (2023-05-26 12:29:10+00:00): Great!  Now we know (without having to do a web search) that GHSL is a web map layer, and (after a web search) it's actually Europe's Copernicus "Global Human Settlement Layer".  We still don't know the actual URL that you used since https://ghsl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ is just a website, not a map.
Seandebasti (2023-05-26 14:29:37+00:00): I did not use any data of this service. I wrote, it just indicates visually where areas could be inhabitated. So you put GHSL data into your own GIS (like QGIS), look around where is light and than check osm if there is really something inhabitated. Its just coincidentally picked by flashy areas. Its called adventure to find something what is not on the map. Is that wrong just to explore with other open data your next place to map? How do you pick where you map?