piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 07:42:21+00:00): Hello!

You used
colour=weiss
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13520147970/history

Have you maybe meant
colour=white
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Đuro Jiří (2026-02-03 06:34:36+00:00): Hola, por curiosidad, ¿por qué borraste las carreteras razred:highway=*? Si alguien crea mapas usando solo imágenes satelitales, no puede determinar si estas carreteras aún existen.
aTarom (2026-02-03 08:19:08+00:00): Hola, eliminé vías superpuestas y corregí el prefijo de las que estaban mal escritas, "razared:..." por "razed:...". Si el puente no existe debes ponerle razed:... al puente no?
aTarom (2026-02-03 08:36:10+00:00): Solucionado, rescato la way eliminada y le corrijo el prefijo "razared:..." por "razed:..."
NeisBot (2026-02-03 06:15:14+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13520176349 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Prabhakar Studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-11 05:07:20+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178388579
(No visible changes after review)
bartgron (2026-02-03 16:38:50+00:00): Zestaw zmian został wycofany z powodu rażących błędów.
Pozdrawiam.
TANI POŚREDNIK MEDIATOR (2026-02-03 19:09:27+00:00): Bardzo proszę o wyjaśnienie odnośnie tych rażących błędów, jeżeli to możliwe będę wdzięczny za podpowiedz jak te błędy poprawić. Pozdrawiam Arkadiusz Ulążka
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-05 15:34:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/710540673

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
felipeeugenio (2026-02-02 19:57:50+00:00): Hola. por favor solo nombres oficiales. Además, varios de los tags de la entrada a la casa están incorrectos. Los acabo de arreglar y los borró para agregarlos otra vez y con un nombre distinto.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178021501
SekeRob (2026-02-03 06:40:01+00:00): Hi,
Flagged by QA.... beton is concrete in OSM global speak. Pls correct. 
Ciao
Bat Wings (2026-02-03 19:21:56+00:00): Hi,
According to AIP ITALY 07AUG 2025
Apron 1 Concrete 
Apron 2 Concrete + BITUMCONG as changed like that but I couldnt find BITUMCONG metarial
Bat Wings (2026-02-03 19:24:50+00:00): but Bıtumcong metarial is like kind of type asphalt so that change maked like   that
SekeRob (2026-02-04 22:09:02+00:00): Hi,
Apron 1 shows correct with concrete, but apron 2 still has beton in the multi value.
Bat Wings (2026-02-05 09:44:47+00:00): Hi
As mentioned I assist from AIP which is show airport facilities,properties about aprons runways ,surface types,datas...etc.If Apron 2 just concrete They would explain as just concrete but writing as Conc / bıtumcong it is means not just conc or asfalth we cannot know what is proportion about concrete and asfalth just as one part could be use concrete or asfalth
 finaly, AIP concern that writing to elements however ,ıf apron 2 had one element they write asfalth,concrete ....but apron 2 has depend on multi surface types
SekeRob (2026-02-05 10:06:20+00:00): Have changed apron2 to surface=asphalt;concrete where the previous values look like another language {Dutch, German?) The system says there can only be 1 surface value. I can actually go there and see from the side terminal entrance where the gate is always open, public access to rental and parking's. The runway extention of 380 meters has not been opened/commissioned yet. Definitely concrete.
Bat Wings (2026-02-05 11:58:14+00:00): Hi ,
I haven't been there so that My main source AIP's directive what they are mentioned as we should change about attributes.(AIP's language english also place's mother language).You said 'ı have been there ıt is definetly apron 2 concrete you can alter depend on  your observations.
In aviation, we are  using AIP ıf you want you can verify from this URL https://www.enav.it/en/what-we-do/we-create-solutions-for-international-markets/informazioni-aeronautiche/aip-italia
Thank you
NeisBot (2026-02-03 06:15:16+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13510335228 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Fitness center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-11 05:07:22+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178388581
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
user_23738633 (2026-02-02 19:54:04+00:00): https://www.echecs-yverdon.ch/

No problem.chess club
felipeeugenio (2026-02-02 19:59:13+00:00): Hola. Estos nombres son oficiales? o es solo ese un bosque de Quillayes? Lo mismo el Camino. Por favor no usar nombres descriptivos.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178021924
felipeeugenio (2026-02-02 20:00:43+00:00): Además, por favor, no pegar los usos de suelo a los caminos. Quedó todo cruzado. Gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178021924
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-21 15:14:50+00:00): I'm not entirely sure why a mapper of your experience thought using Google Maps as a source for OpenStreetMap was acceptable, when you noted on the fixme=* that it was proprietary, but as it seems you later verified the name independently I won't revert it. However, you missed updating one of the two ways composing the street, which as of right now is still explicitly sourced from Google Maps.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-06-21 16:59:58+00:00): County GIS doesn't display a name for it, assessor's parcel maps don't display a name, and street view doesn't exist at the intersection of this road and Badura Avenue.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-06-21 18:33:29+00:00): Sorry, but I'm not following how any of that is supposed to justify using an explicitly prohibited source. By contrast, Google being the _only_ source for the name makes all the risks and problems of copying it from them much more severe, both the legal risks (it becomes a de-facto "Copyright Easter Egg") and offers unclear value as its just whatever Google's AI thinks/assumes it should be; you could make that same judgement yourself (I would) in a blackbox without it.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-06-25 19:30:21+00:00): Okay. I have removed the name here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184602734
CAM-Gerlach (2026-06-26 04:51:23+00:00): Thanks
NeisBot (2026-02-03 06:15:17+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13520259137 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Locksmith shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-11 05:07:23+00:00): 🗑️🤖 Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/178388582

 If you believe this deletion was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
Let’s Go Locksmith (2026-02-11 14:55:00+00:00): My apologies I’m just seeing this, I’ll go ahead and change it, I'm sorry I didn’t know
silversurfer83 (2026-02-02 21:19:03+00:00): Thank you.

I know that residential might not be the perfect value yet it is far better suited that "meadow".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178022227
NeisBot (2026-02-03 06:15:19+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13506792207 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Chiropractic Center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-11 05:07:24+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178388583
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-02-03 06:15:20+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/9140624864 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mexican restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-11 05:07:25+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178388584
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-02-03 06:14:03+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 25 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1207305974 v4 | 18 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/11186855257 v2
https://osm.org/node/806558337 v4
https://osm.org/node/11186855256 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178023148
NeisBot (2026-02-02 20:29:22+00:00): Hi roguetraildeleter, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 12 highway(s)
- 7 name(s)
- 10 surface(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178023158
roguetraildeleter (2026-02-02 20:31:51+00:00): @Neisbot these deletions were intentional, trails are illegal and should not be mapped publicly.
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-03 05:59:12+00:00): Please see comments here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178019059
Hb- (2026-03-22 20:57:01+00:00): Danke. Siehe auch note/5081593
NeisBot (2026-02-03 06:15:21+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13512507871 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Insurance agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-11 05:07:26+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178388585
(No visible changes after review)
Fizzie-DWG (2026-02-02 22:33:12+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19741
YomanNH (2026-02-03 07:56:44+00:00): Wycofałem ten wandalizm.
Patryk2710 (2026-02-03 00:28:42+00:00): Hej! Dlaczego zmieniasz access AED z customers na yes? Masz informacje że są one całodobowo dostępne?
maro21 (2026-02-04 16:19:07+00:00): Defibrylatory są publicznie dostępne, nie trzeba być klientem, żeby ich użyć. Godzin otwarcia nie zmieniałem.
hoserab (2026-02-03 17:09:59+00:00): Hello Erin,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! It appears you are a new user. For your information I have manually reverted a few of the changes you made here.

In particular, you changed the tagging of several road segments to `highway=motorway`, which is a tag meant to be used on limited-access highways with high speed limits. Please refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Roads and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway for more information.

I think it would be helpful for you to refer to the beginners' guide at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide for a general overview of how tagging of map elements work, and how carefully it must be done.

If you need any help or clarification on how to change something, please feel free to ask questions in the discussion forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Thanks, and happy mapping. :)
Erin Lecky (2026-02-07 01:26:37+00:00): Hi, thanks for letting me know and for reverting those changes. I appreciate you taking the time to explain.

I’m new to OpenStreetMap and clearly misunderstood the appropriate use of highway=motorway. I’ll review the wiki pages and the beginner’s guide you linked so I can tag roads more accurately going forward.

Thanks again for the guidance, and apologies for the confusion.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-02-25 06:57:48+00:00): Oh, okay then. (The "splitting" of CA 56 confused me; this seemed to clear things up for me.) I went ahead and added Ted Williams Fwy back to the CA 56 relations and removed Carmel Valley Rd from them.
TrickyFoxy (2026-03-05 21:44:21+00:00): Что вы имели в виду?
NeisBot (2026-02-03 06:15:22+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13520418911 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Training Academy"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-11 05:07:26+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178388587
(No visible changes after review)
旧加卷 (2026-02-09 08:10:19+00:00): r/18081566 is broken. Please remove w/1473719257 from the relation.
Anatoliy (2026-02-09 08:40:28+00:00): fixed
flex16 (2026-02-04 11:03:54+00:00): Der Änderungssatz wurde von mir teilweise rückgängig gemacht. In OSM wollen wir Fahrspuren nicht trennen, solange keine bauliche Trennung vorhanden ist, wegen der Einfachheit. Die Radspur wird hier wurde durch die Kreuzung durchgezogen, um das Radrouting nicht unnötig zu zerschnippeln und damit es durchgänig ist...
m_fuhrmann (2026-02-04 13:56:01+00:00): Hi.

Nur um es zu verstehen: Du meinst, dass man die Alte Ziegelei Straße nicht für die Länge der Ausfahrt parallel zur Dipperzer Straße verlaufen lassen sollte, weil keine bauliche Trennung dazwischen ist?

Aber was genau meinst du mit zerschnipseln? Meine Änderung hatte den Radweg auch nur einmal über die Straße kreuzen lassen. Mit einer Punktverbindung. Wie kann das das Radrouting durcheinander bringen?

Die Tags
crossing:island=no
crossing=unmarked
sind nun oben an der Fußgängerquerung wieder weg. Hat das einen bestimmten Grund, den ich noch nicht kenne?

Danke für deine Hilfe!
flex16 (2026-02-04 14:13:39+00:00): Genau das habe ich gemeint. Man mappt nicht Abbiegespuren extra "lang", wenn keine bauliche Trennung vorhanden ist.

Das ist ziemlicher Konsens. Dazu gab es bereits einige Diskussionen im Forum.

Ich dachte du wolltest die Abbiegespur da lang ziehen, weil die Radspur auch da über die Kreuzung gezogen wurde, obwohl da ja eigentlich auch keine bauliche Trennung vorhanden ist. Deshalb hatte ich den allgemeinen Hinweis gegeben, dass, würde man jetzt die Radspur am Beginn der Kreuzung mit der Fahrbahn verbinden, das Routing für Radfahrer zerschnippelt werden würde, weil dann der Radfahrer für das kleine Stück wieder über die Fahrbahn geroutet werden würde, obwohl er einfach ein kleines Stück weiter geradeaus fahren müsste.

Da hatte ich mich vielleicht etwas schlecht ausgedrückt.

Die fehlenden Tags werde ich wieder hinzufügen.
m_fuhrmann (2026-02-04 14:28:56+00:00): Das mit der baulichen Trennung habe ich verstanden.

Aber nicht das mit dem Radrouting.
Ich glaube so war es vorher, oder?
https://postimg.cc/47K9qV6x
Meinst du, dass die Router dann über die Abbiegespur und wieder auf die Einfädelspur auf die Dipperzer Straße routen würden, anstatt auf dem Radweg gerade aus zu bleiben?
Was würde sie jetzt davon abhalten?
flex16 (2026-02-04 14:42:01+00:00): Der Hinweis mit dem Radrouting hatte per se nichts mit deiner Bearbeitung zu tun. Es war schon vorher gut so und deine Bearbeitung hatte auch nichts an dem Radrouting geändert.

Ich hatte gemeint, wenn man an beiden Seiten den Radweg per link mit der straße verbinden würde, und den Radweg nicht über die Kreuzung  ziehen würde, würde beschriebenes Verhalten passieren. Ich wollte das nur wegen der Regel mit der baulichen Trennung erklären.
m_fuhrmann (2026-02-04 18:21:26+00:00): I see. Danke für die Erklärung. 

Btw. Wir würden uns echt super freuen, wenn du es vlt ab und zu in den Chat schaffst. Deine Erfahrung ist goldwert und ich fände es super happy, wenn wir vielleicht auch einige Dinge für Fulda+Region definieren könnten. Auch vlt um Tagging unterschiede zu vermeiden. Kannst es dir ja mal überlegen.
NeisBot (2026-02-03 06:15:23+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13510040883 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dentistry practice"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-11 05:07:27+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178388588
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-02-03 06:14:11+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 35 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/768764715 v10 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1473723878 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1473723876 v1 | 4 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178025978
NeisBot (2026-02-03 06:15:24+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13041213742 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Craft workshop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-11 05:07:28+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178388589
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-02-03 06:15:25+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13512808664 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Furniture store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-11 05:07:28+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178388591
(No visible changes after review)
Tomas Straupis (2026-02-03 07:40:27+00:00): Pakeitimas atšauktas. Duomenys buvo teisingi, tokia ir yra reali žemėnauda. Be to, kad buvo pribraižyti neegzistuojantys objektai, buvo sugadinta ir krūva toje vietoje esančių kitų objektų: administracinės ribos, miškeliai ir pan.
NeisBot (2026-02-03 06:15:27+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13519809368 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Aflac Insurance Agent office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-11 05:07:31+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178388593
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-21 04:09:32+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted adding duplicate SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186094411
HighRouleur (2026-02-22 02:24:03+00:00): There is bike path along Governor Rd as noted in this changes
Warin61 (2026-02-04 03:04:26+00:00): Hi
Relation 18972979 McLeans Island is now broken ....
Warin61 (2026-04-17 05:02:51+00:00): No response. 

Part revert this changeset