piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jdiddid (2024-04-04 13:39:41+00:00): Hey David, this is Joseph (I attend some of the bike events in La Porte and recognize you). I do a lot of the updates to the map around LP here and just wanted to let you know about some quick tweaks I'm planning to do the things you added to the map.

The bikeway down 18th street, I had mapped separately (as you have it mapped) for a couple years, but recently I changed it to be a marked two-way bike lane mapped on the road itself since there was no barrier/separation (I wasn't aware it was still mixed used past I street). Since it is mixed-use I'll update it to be a mixed use instead of cyclepath and add in the connections to I street and Andrew to help with routing, and then I'll remove the bike lane I mapped down 18th Street so it doesn't mess up routing or have two objects representing one thing. I'm going to remove the name of the new lane as well unless it's offially signed/called that, as it seems more informal/descriptive than should be for a "name" tag here on OpenStreetMap.

Other than that on the way 1092450417 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1092450417) I'm going to remove the non-descriptive name Farmland from that (it's already mapped as a farmland relation, the editor just doesn't show that a relation exists well sometimes)

Let me know if you want to go over these edits further, or feel free to comment on this or my update changeset for further discussion.

I do want to say thank you so much for the edits, it'd be awesome to have more up to date bike and pedestrian infrastructure mapped around here, I appreciate the edit and hope you keep up your mapping!
ZinaidaZ (2024-04-04 07:57:28+00:00): Добрый день! В этом здании располагается не только пункт выдачи заказов вайлдбериз.
Перенесите теги для ПВЗ на отдельную точку внутри здания. На полигоне здания могут быть установлены только теги, характеризующее все здание целиком.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149533638
silversurfer83 (2024-04-03 19:03:10+00:00): Hi
kann es sein, dass dort ein Schild steht, welches explizit 3 Stellplätze für Wohnmobile ausweist?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149534197
dathoschy (2024-04-03 19:06:22+00:00): Nein, das Grundstück ist Privatgelände von Fa. Fabri was an die Brauerei Veltins verpachtet wurde. Der Stellplatz für die Wohnmobile ist auf der anderen Seite der Straße bei Pension Am Einberg.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149534197
gendy54 (2024-04-04 18:21:10+00:00): Attention à bien enlever toutes les infos qui concernent l'ancien commerce: site internet, etc...
LH31 (2024-04-04 20:12:53+00:00): En l’occurrence je crois que le site n’a pas changé malgré le changement de nom.
DeKaN (2024-04-03 23:35:35+00:00): Пожалуйста прочитайте https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:lanes:psv и не заменяйте его на lanes:bus
skysamum (2024-04-04 06:00:16+00:00): Исправлю. Не правильно понял трактовку рекомендации.
Jordi MF (2024-04-05 12:43:26+00:00): Per favor, ramon. Fes edicions que no ocupen un espai tan gran. És millor realitzar edicions d'una mateixa àrea geogràfica.
bxl-forever (2024-04-03 20:03:05+00:00): This restaurant is already on the map.
Reverted.
Leo Slager (2024-04-03 19:44:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-03 23:08:22+00:00): Reviewed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149535690
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-03 17:30:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11783613622

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ivanbranco (2024-04-06 12:07:04+00:00): Hi Apay00,

as another user pointed out 3 months ago, could you use better changeset comments? See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
MxxCon (2024-04-05 02:50:34+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you tag intersections of a sidewalk on 151st Ave with parking lot driveways as marked crossings? Satellite imagery doesn't show any markings.

Also, how come you tagged intersection of 88th St and 151st Ave as uncontrolled when you can clearly see diagonal traffic light gantries extending into the middle of the intersection?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149535858
haycam (2024-04-25 14:48:25+00:00): Hello, thank you for the feedback. I made a mistake marking them. The driveways should be unmarked and intersections controlled. Thanks again
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149535858
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:24:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
philippec (2024-04-03 20:04:16+00:00): Ik ben Philippe Casteleyn en ik hou de AEDs op OSM in de gaten.
Uw AED staat op een parking.
Ik zou het wel zelf verbeteren, maar ik weet niet waar het staat en waar de ingang is.
philippec (2024-04-03 20:11:53+00:00): Tegewoordig werkt mapillary meestal ook indoor.  Dat zouden we dit probleem niet gehad hebben.
joost schouppe (2024-04-04 07:53:56+00:00): Bekijk de changeset eens in Ahavi: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=149536117
Ik draai hem even terug, hier zijn wat foutjes gebeurd en is er niks wezenlijk toegevoegd
philippec (2024-04-04 13:41:51+00:00): Vreemd, ik dacht dat er geen history  van de node was.  Ik kijk daar anders altijd naar.
flohoff (2024-04-05 19:00:16+00:00): Moin
ich hab den changeset hier gesehen. Cool das du mit mappst.

Aber bist du dir mit dem office=telecommunications sicher? Die T-Systems ist ja nicht die Telekom und die T-Systems (Ehemals Debis Systemhaus) ist ein IT Dienstleister - kein Telekommunikationsunternehmen oder ?

Flo
rab (2024-04-03 18:27:10+00:00): Hallo Ulli,
könntest du bitte zuerst deine Hinterlassenschaften in Sambia aufräumen bevor du hier die Karte auch noch ruinierst
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-04 00:48:10+00:00): Access tags should be used for the "private" portions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149536438
wireguy (2024-04-03 19:51:51+00:00): Convissor, nice adds.   They look like they should be 1643-1645, 1647.
But it looks like that side of the street needs some onsite checking.
convissor (2024-04-03 20:31:04+00:00): Thanks. Visited Philly over the weekend. I'm AMAZED at how much construction is happening. Really need to replicate that around the country. Especially in NYC and surrounding suburbs.

FYI, can look up property info at https://atlas.phila.gov/. Haven't had a moment to do that for these adds yet.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-04 06:25:22+00:00): Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268766355 is actually a building?

I see some dark area on Bing aerial that you also used but to me it seems that it could be also shadow in this logged area or something else which is not a building.
eginhard (2024-04-04 12:24:48+00:00): Hi Amerillo, thank you for these updates! For oneway streets where bikes can use both directions, the tag "oneway:bicycle=no" needs to be added as well. Some streets now also have both cycleway:left= and cycleway:both= tags with different values - the latter should only be used when the left and right side is the same. Let me know in case of any questions!
Best, eginhard
RobertH-PUM (2024-04-03 18:50:14+00:00): Salut. 
Cateva corectii :
1. pentru un drum propus care nu e inca in executie folosesti highway=proposed si apoi proposed=tip_drum unde tip_drum poate fi trunk , primary , tertiary , etc. 
2. Cat timp nu ai o plansa exacta cu drumul sa vezi detaliile gen poduri sau sens giratoriu, e mai bine sa pastrezi noul drum ca o singura linie neintrerupta si sa nu o legi de alte drumuri pentru ca atunci cand vei revenii sa calibrezi, sa nu tragi din greseala de alte chestii de pe harta. 

In rest, pentru cum adaugi mai multe detalii sa apara si pe harta API, consulta https://forum.peundemerg.ro/index.php?topic=836.0
.
Spor la editari . :)
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-05 06:47:26+00:00): partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150660858
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-04 06:23:32+00:00): Hello!

Note that you do not need to add "bâtiment" description as name.

Marking feature type is enough, there is no need to put description into name field.

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268777580 - building=yes already describes it as a building.
wambacher (2024-04-03 21:51:16+00:00): danke.
Warin61 (2024-04-05 12:11:08+00:00): Advice?

If you cannot clearly see it, don't map it.

Most buildings are 'square' - using right angled corners. Use the 'Q' key to square up what you have mapped while the feature is seleted.

Hope that helps.
hatul (2024-04-04 05:55:34+00:00): הי, יצרת בטעות נתק ביחס של שביל ישראל. תוכל לתקן?
hatul (2024-04-04 11:05:04+00:00): תיקנתי עכשיו
opendcc (2024-04-04 04:02:41+00:00): Hallo,
kann man auf dem Weg nach Allersing gar nicht durchfahren oder ist die Durchfahrt für nicht landwirtschaftliche Fahrzeuge gesperrt?
silversurfer83 (2024-04-03 19:05:15+00:00): Moin Kersti :)

du hast hier "bench=5" eingetragen. Was genau meinst du damit?
Wenn die Bank Platz für 5 bietet, dann sollte da "bench=yes" und "seats=5" hin.

Cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149539043
Kersti Nebelsiek (2024-05-07 21:58:09+00:00): Nein, es gibt 5 Bänke. An fünf der sechs Wände jeweils eine.
bxl-forever (2024-04-03 20:11:12+00:00): Oui, mais sur un node séparé svp.
Xvtn (2024-04-03 22:10:49+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. Looks great overall! I think you made the right call here in adding access tags rather than deleting altogether. That's because if it's completely deleted, there's no information about whether the trail is unmapped but legal, etc. In this case, I think to further discourage use we could remove the name tag as well.
On a related note, I see there's an "Elk Meadow Shelter" feature too. If the trail is off limits, is there some other way to access the shelter? Or is that closed too?

Thanks for your contribution, and again, welcome!
marczoutendijk_repair (2024-04-03 19:14:20+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 149369349, 149370048, 149406686, 149406840, 149490838, 149498939.
literan (2024-04-03 20:15:23+00:00): дубль, уже есть
syntex (2024-04-23 23:05:45+00:00): To prawda, granice RODów czasem są trudne do ustalenia. Na paluchu kilka rodów ma granice orientacyjne
Filip009 (2024-04-05 20:14:46+00:00): Most bol ale nastavený, ako vo výstavbe. Ste si istý, že na danom mieste nebude stáť nový most?
Lukáš geocaching (2024-04-07 10:29:00+00:00): Aháá, áno máte pravdu. Asi tam bude nový, len momentálne sa tam nič nenachádza. Vôbec som si nevšimol že je nastavený ako vo výstavbe. Strašne sa ospravedlňujem som tu nový.
Leo Slager (2024-04-04 10:58:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Langlaeufer (2024-04-05 15:39:02+00:00): Hallo HanSte23
dann mach doch am besten highway=footway draus.
Es sind ja schließlich keine Wald- und Feldwege. erst recht nicht, wenn dort keine Fahrzeuge fahren dürfen.
HanSte23 (2024-04-11 19:55:11+00:00): Hallo Langlaeufer,
danke für den Hinweis. Ich hab mir das heute nochmal vor Ort angeschaut und entsprechend geändert.
dypa (2024-05-01 18:41:28+00:00): пожалуйста используйте условия для подобных правок https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Access_time_and_other_conditional_restrictions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150764075
dypa (2024-04-06 10:12:13+00:00): Расскажите пожалуйста почему вы отмечаете временное событие? Нет никаких гарантий, что после окончания просушки тег access будет возвращен в исходное состояние.  Почему вы не использовали тег opening_hours (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours) для указания часов работы?

Почему вы обозначили access=no? Вы ознакомились с 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:access перед правками?
По вашей логике сотрудники парка не могут перемещаться по дорожкам, а это не так.
dypa (2024-05-01 18:41:29+00:00): пожалуйста используйте условия для подобных правок https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Access_time_and_other_conditional_restrictions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150764075
NeisBot (2024-04-07 11:04:03+00:00): Hello Ag mc, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
CasperGeo (2024-06-22 08:43:39+00:00): Hi MaxRuby, good effort identifying individual buildings, but please note that most buildings are square, in some cases you identified only parts of the actual building. You can press Q to square features. Many thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149541430
Xvtn (2024-04-03 22:06:19+00:00): For many tags such as surface=, you should stick to established values. In this case I think the thickness or application method of the asphalt is outside the scope of OSM, so it should just be surface=asphalt.
Xvtn (2024-04-04 14:48:19+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! In the future, please save your work before moving on to another area. That makes it much easier for others to review your work. More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Xvtn (2024-04-03 22:04:48+00:00): Howdy! Since you requested a review, I looked over your recent changesets here. Looks great overall! Here are some tips:
- It's best to avoid abbreviations for things like addresses and names and stuff, since it's easy for a renderer to shorten a name, but can be less simple to expand an abbreviation.
- If you know the exact or approximate boundary of the mountain campus, you may consider changing the point to an area.
- For the maintenance barn etc., I think this is kind of on the border of a "descriptive name" - The name tag should only be used to describe the actual official or common name of something, not just to describe it. In this case, my suggestion would be to remove the name, and add the following tags instead:

building=barn (or building=shed)
operator=Denver University Maintenance

Like I said though, if the name really is that, and you feel like it belongs there then I'd say it's fine. :)

Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contributions! I might leave a couple other comments relevant to your other changesets.
szydzio (2024-04-03 20:13:58+00:00): @Alanantos
Tak by the way - "wiśnia" po niemiecku to jest "Sauerkirsche", w odróżnieniu od "Kirsche" co oznacza czereśnię...
VictorIE (2025-05-14 11:09:19+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268821158

Does this actually exist?
VictorIE (2025-05-14 11:12:18+00:00): Also this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11784558619
Leo Slager (2024-04-04 11:00:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
VictorIE (2024-04-06 13:24:34+00:00): Hi

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1257555480

building:levels=1.5 with roof:levels=1.5 would seem to suggest a 3-storey building.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:levels would seem to say building:levels=1 with roof:levels=1
LateNightTone (2024-04-07 10:45:25+00:00): Yeah, you're right - I think I was erroneously swayed by 3D rendering, which defaults to displaying as roof:levels=1 unless otherwise specified, so was tagging relative to that. I'll change to 0.5 and add a roof:height tag.
Xvtn (2024-04-03 22:46:14+00:00): Howdy! In this case, my understanding is that the South prefix is correct for the street address. What was your reasoning for removing it?
AidanJHMurphy (2024-04-12 21:49:00+00:00): Sorry, I don't remember exactly what I changed, and I'm having a hard time parsing the change set.

It makes sense for "S 200 East" to be the street rather than "15 S" to be an address, but I don't really know UT street address formats. It's not really in the spirit of this project to use google maps as a source, but they also agree with that. That said, they split the street into two based on the "N" or "S" prefix, and the app I use to make edits (Organic Maps), doesn't have "S 200 East" available as an option. Instead it only has "200 East" named to match the street as it is named on OpenStreetMap itself.
Xvtn (2024-11-07 20:52:03+00:00): Sorry I never got back to you on this. Originally, you changed addr:street from "South 200 East" to "200 East". Typically when rendering an address, OSM data consumers will do addr:housenumber + addr:street. Since housenumber is (correctly) 15, it makes sense to have the full street name, including "south" prefix, so that it's rendered as "15 South 200 East" instead of "15 200 East". Hope that makes sense! And sorry for the delay.
Xvtn (2024-11-07 20:53:54+00:00): Regarding Organic Maps' options for street name, that app is likely searching nearby roads for available names, but only parsing name=, which is indeed just 200 East. It should be checking for name:full or name:prefix when matching addresses. Here's a link to the page that describes the way addresses are laid out in Cache Valley and much of Utah: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-06 05:46:08+00:00): Hello!

Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree".

So for buildings it is not needed to put House as their name.

Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268827953 is specifically named with such name?

And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
    
Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.
marczoutendijk_repair (2024-04-05 08:54:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149603227 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2024-04-05 08:54:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149603227 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
Glassman (2024-04-04 19:24:52+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: a better changeset comment would be helpful. Something short and descriptive. WoD isn't very helpful.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149543774
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:24:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:25:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:24:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:25:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:23:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:25:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:24:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:23:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:23:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:22:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:25:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
ZekOwney (2024-04-16 15:33:51+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai l'impression que tu as fait une modification à l'envers pour le parking du Leclerc Auto à Ifs. Le parking a bien été réaménagé l'an passé, constaté sur site, et à partir de l'ortho 2023.
CjMalone (2024-04-14 16:16:42+00:00): Hey, did you mean to remove Aldi in this, or was it an accident?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:25:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:23:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
mcliquid (2024-04-09 06:57:09+00:00): Hallo Mark-Andrew, wenn du maxspeed ergänzt, musst du darauf achten, dass nicht bereits maxspeed:backward und
maxspeed:forward gesetzt ist, sonst überschreiben sich die Werte gegenseitig. Wurde hier in dem Fall bereits verbessert. Ist mir in Uhldingen aber auch schon aufgefallen.

Viele Grüße
Mark-Andrew (2024-04-10 13:18:11+00:00): Hallo mcliquid, 

danke für den Hinweis. 

In Unteruhldingen war es tatsächlich falsch. Hier, im Segment nach dem Riedleparktunnel, sollte es aber gepasst haben. Dort gilt in beide Richtungen 80 km/h (dynamisch). 

Viele Grüße
  Mark-Andrew
mcliquid (2024-04-10 14:33:25+00:00): Beim Riedleparktunnel stand nach deiner Bearbeitung:
maxspeed=80
maxspeed:backward=signals
maxspeed:forward=60

Rene hat das nun schon korrigiert und das dynamische in "source:maxspeed=signals" eingeordnet. Jetzt passt es auf jeden Fall!

Danke dir für deine Unterstützung am schönen Bodensee!
VictorIE (2024-04-08 05:47:37+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11784660800

This post box appears to be in a field. :)

Should it be tagged operator=Royal Mail and operator:wikidata=Q638098
c2r (2024-04-08 08:25:30+00:00): Ha, it's not far off;  I've fixed the exact location and added metadata.