piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
022 (2026-02-07 04:59:12+00:00): Hi there, 

just for future reference please try and avoid binding landuse elements (for example, a park) directly to an adjoining road. This can create problems down the line when modifying the data. Mapping best practice is to keep landuse seperate from any other objects.

Cheers!
Gunnar Foss (2026-02-01 02:46:09+00:00): Long Beach*
dcskobuffs (2026-02-09 19:13:12+00:00): Hello JSR1781,

I noticed some recent updates to destination tags on major highways in Lima that I wanted to get some insight on. For example, Mapillary imagery (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-12.030390199972018&lng=-76.99430419999999&z=17&pKey=223217486770362&focus=photo&x=0.45435725507933733&y=0.5071405201810766&zoom=2.154747427911534) shows a destination sign for “Chosica; Autopista Ramiro Prialé” pointed towards https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161901337, which Chosica was removed from. I’ve noticed several other recent edits where the destination values shown in Mapillary imagery match the destination values that were previously present in OSM before your updates. With that in mind, I’m curious if you have any additional context on how these destination tags are being updated, and what criteria or references are being used for these changes.

Thank you and looking forward to hearing from you,
Dcskobuffs

Traducción automática:
Hola JSR1781,

He notado algunas actualizaciones recientes en las etiquetas de destino de las principales autopistas de Lima y me gustaría obtener más información al respecto. Por ejemplo, las imágenes de Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-12.030390199972018&lng=-76.99430419999999&z=17&pKey=223217486770362&focus=photo&x=0.45435725507933733&y=0.5071405201810766&zoom=2.154747427911534) muestran una señal de destino para "Chosica; Autopista Ramiro Prialé" que apunta a https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161901337, de donde se eliminó Chosica. He observado varias otras ediciones recientes donde los valores de destino que se muestran en las imágenes de Mapillary coinciden con los valores de destino que estaban presentes anteriormente en OSM antes de sus actualizaciones. Teniendo esto en cuenta, me gustaría saber si tiene algún contexto adicional sobre cómo se están actualizando estas etiquetas de destino y qué criterios o referencias se están utilizando para estos cambios.

Gracias y espero su respuesta,
Dcskobuffs
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 23:19:03+00:00): Split POI from building, cleaned up SEO spam, fixed tags, and added missing top-level tagging for POI "OMEGA Company" in changeset 184371115

https://osm.org/changeset/184371115
NeisBot (2026-02-01 06:57:47+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 36 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1472910063 v1 | 13 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1472910035 v2 | 11 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1472910057 v2 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13514050021 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177950082
NeisReview (2026-02-08 09:28:20+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178030071
woodpeck (2026-02-17 11:49:11+00:00): Dear KvardeX OSM, please have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments and use better changeset comments. Thank you!
QuiLe (2026-02-01 05:03:11+00:00): Hi there and thanks for your contribution to OSM! Can you please detail the source for your additions? It looks like you used "local knowledge" and some of these amenities are added close to the road node and not the building that the business is located in. Having accurate locations for nodes is important for OSM. Additionally, the addition of addr tags for where these businesses are missing. If you have these addresses it's important to add it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177950831
masoudghorbani (2026-02-01 05:39:16+00:00): بانک صادرات تعطیل شده و جای آن داروخانه افتتاح شده است
masoudghorbani (2026-02-01 05:40:06+00:00): شهر جوجه و کباب نارنج بالای کوچه یزدان پژوه است، مکان رستوران اصلاح شد
vasagavavv (2026-02-01 05:42:30+00:00): Добавил парк, скорректировал границы города, нанес часть дорог СНТ Текстильщики-4
jhaluska80 (2026-04-30 16:42:09+00:00): Beautiful work on the basins.
keithonearth (2026-02-02 03:39:46+00:00): I checked again today, and the left turn lane that connects with 8th is still only accessible to buses, and a police officer is on site to ensure the turn restriction is followed. I believe keeping this as a busway is appropriate.
chris66 (2026-02-20 13:24:11+00:00): Auf der Webseite des XIAO wird folgende Adresse angegeben:

Castroper Hellweg 40,
44805 Bochum

Grüße
Chris
hertipau (2026-02-21 07:12:18+00:00): Hi Chris,
ja, das hatte ich na klar auch bemerkt.
Die Hausnummernvergabe ist in diesem Bereich in der Tat etwas wild.
Das Gebäude ist seit 2019 mit Harpener Feld 15 gemapt. Das ist nach Abgleich mit ALKIS und dem Geoportal.bochum m.M.n. auch korrekt. Die Gebäude beginnen im südwestlichen Bereich mit Harpener Feld 1-3 und enden bei Harpener Feld 15 (XIAO). Das A.T.U.-Gebäude darunter hat hingegen Castroper Hellweg 28. Warum auch immer.

beste Grüße
Herb
hoserab (2026-02-02 17:18:08+00:00): Hello Lucas,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! It appears you are a new user. For your information I have manually reverted a few of the changes you made here, and in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177784473.

In particular, you changed the tagging of several road segments to `highway=motorway`, which is a tag meant to be used on limited-access highways with high speed limits. Please refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Roads and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway for more information.

I think it would be helpful for you to refer to the beginners' guide at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide for a general overview of how tagging of map elements work, and how carefully it must be done.

If you need any help or clarification on how to change something, please feel free to ask questions in the discussion forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Thanks, and happy mapping. :)
memmane (2026-02-01 11:21:07+00:00): can you not delete the road?
mona_magdy (2026-02-02 08:03:16+00:00): Hello, memmane;
Thank you for your contribution to updating the roads on OpenStreetMap in the UAE. In this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177953177#map=19/24.205259/55.772586&layers=N). I deleted this street (w1472757240) and merged this street (w1472757241) with this street (w228569498) because they made a sharp angle and the classification 'highway=unclassified' is too large for the shape of these streets evident in recent satellite images, so perhaps it would be better to lower the classification to a 'highway=track' that would be more suitable for these lanes., based on all the available images in the JOSM. and coulud you please share with me the sourse to these constraints in this set of changes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177960598#map=18/24.204801/55.771787&layers=N).
Regards
mona_magdy
memmane (2026-02-03 11:14:16+00:00): the road there is a real road used for access to permanent human settlements, it is not a track/land access road
" Roads used for access to permanent human settlements or facilities should generally not use this tag"
-from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack
memmane (2026-02-03 11:15:17+00:00): on esri world imagery, the road is faint but it is clearer on bing imagery
mona_magdy (2026-02-03 12:03:17+00:00): Thank you for the clarification.
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-12 23:21:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 178479265 where the changeset comment is: revert changes that pretend to be made with vespucci but aren't
NeisBot (2026-02-02 06:55:22+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1416935586 v5 | 9 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177953760
NeisReview (2026-02-09 07:22:49+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178027455
Herman Lee (2026-02-02 06:31:34+00:00): 本修改集已退回，详见：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177992072
旧加卷 (2026-02-01 08:10:59+00:00): way/953521799 , way/953521801 , and way/953521798 has been restored
MassCartog (2026-02-01 16:21:33+00:00): Hi Welcome to OSM! You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Not being public access/official areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

For example, for a private cafe not open to the public in, tag it as amenity=cafe, and add the tag access=private to specify it is restricted. This tag signals that the venue requires prior permission or invitation.

Names don't necessarily have to be official, if these are the common name that is used and agreed to by locals, then they should remain. "names on record for the public" is not a criteria for naming features in OSM. If someone knows the name of a feature, they can add it to OSM, which is what seems to have happened here.

So if there is a sign like this: https://i.imgur.com/mv92lT2.png at that location, and that's what the locals call it, and a user freely added it, it should not be removed.

Thanks,

Please read this for more info related to this topic:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

osm.wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
ScrawnyMeowth1 (2026-02-03 22:09:41+00:00): Hello sheidsa,

Thanks for your contributions. Just a note, the name= tag should only be used on highways when there is an official name that is used on signage. Descriptive names like "Milton Stateline Seventh Day Adventist School Pick-up & drop off" are not necessary.

Otherwise, keep up the good work!
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-05-26 21:26:56+00:00): Thanks! I must have accidentally edited this parking lot while extending SR 157 east by a few hundred feet/meters.
evgenykatyshev (2026-02-01 11:01:01+00:00): Hello, all roads (except motorways) are two-way by default, so oneway=no is not nessessary
Znaika (2026-02-01 11:22:19+00:00): Hi, bis du sicher, daß die Grünfläche nicht verlängert worden? Der Fußweg verläuft genau an dem Schaltschrank vorbei und die Grünfläche geht bis zum Schaltschrank
Znaika (2026-02-01 11:34:53+00:00): Die Fotos kann ich zu Mapillary nicht hockladen, weil sie ohne GPS sind. Guck bitte hier!
https://i.postimg.cc/mkpxXRBz/20260115-080453.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/QCYL4ssv/20260115-080455.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/T1N87GfK/20260115-080718.jpg
rempshaener (2026-02-01 12:16:01+00:00): Hej,
ja, die mittlere Grünfläche (nur die habe ich angepasst) endet drei Bäume nach dem Gullideckel.
Aber zugegeben: ohne aktuelle Luftbilder ist das alles schwierig.
Für mich sah das gestern auch so aus, dass die Treppe nur "irgendwie" über den RS erreichbar sein wird. Vielleicht fehlen da noch Bodenmarkierungen?
Ich würde jetzt auch für meine Anpassungen Derendorfweg (trotz 2x GPS) nicht die Hand ins Feuer legen.
Viele Grüße
Znaika (2026-02-01 12:25:34+00:00): Es ist richtig, ohne aktuelle Luftbilder ist es schwierig. Ich versuche alte Objekte als Referenz zu verwenden. Ich habe den Fußweg und die Grünfläche wieder angepasst. Auf GPS ist kein Verlass
coatix (2026-02-01 08:54:21+00:00): Hast du mit Absicht beide gelöscht?
Demido (2026-02-01 09:41:02+00:00): Ja, hat tatsächlich schon wieder geschlossen.
Herman Lee (2026-02-02 06:31:30+00:00): 本修改集已退回，详见：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177992072
aboc (2026-03-17 11:33:58+00:00): Ma il CAP non è 38122?
Sakari_N (2026-02-07 12:13:22+00:00): Moi,

Parkkialueen tien voisi merkata highway=service + service=parking_aisle ja kerrostalon oville johtavat polut highway=footway, tai highway=service + service=driveway, jos ne on tarkoitettu autolla ajettaviksi. Yleensä eivät ole.
NeisBot (2026-02-02 06:57:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13516335262 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Physical therapy center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-09 07:22:38+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178297164
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-21 20:15:01+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184404916

https://osm.org/changeset/184404916
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-01 12:12:44+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13516369442
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165308340

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ivanbranco (2026-02-05 14:11:48+00:00): Ciao Clown Pennywise,

grazie per il contributo dei lampioni, vedo su https://watmildon.github.io/Lampioni/ che sei il quarto utente per numero di lampioni aggiunti, ottimo lavoro!

Ho una domanda su questo CS però, cos'è quel "F/" prima del ref:msal? Il codice dal file del ministero è solo "12539". In generale i codici del MSAL sono tutti numerici, non alfanumerici.

Grazie e buon mapping!
Clown Pennywise (2026-02-05 14:25:53+00:00): Ciao Ivan,

ho prelevato il codice da qui:

https://www.salute.gov.it/CercaFarmacie/Ricerca

se il codice corretto è solo la parte numerica posso effettuare la rettifica al volo (si tratta di 8 farmacie cittadine).
bxl-forever (2026-02-17 19:56:23+00:00): Hello,

It is very unlikely that this 38-meter high apartment building is named "West Appliance Service".

If you want to add your company to the map, please do it in a honest way, i.e. create a floating point inside the building area and add a name, business type, opening hours and a website.  But please do *not* rename an existing building if that is not its real name.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-03-04 05:49:22+00:00): Reverted due to intentional SEO vandalism with name of a single company (likely a sole proprietorship) marked as the name of an entire 38-meter high apartment building

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179332841
A67-A67 (2026-02-21 01:01:28+00:00): Here you've also created a duplicate.
Dimacn (2026-02-02 03:07:26+00:00): Спасибо за улучшение карты. Но пожалуйста не удаляйте со зданий тег building -https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/84526635#map=18/52.514143/85.142495
Это могло произойти если вы в списке объектов (пресеты) выбираете территорию вместо здания - они там разные.
Colbertson (2026-02-01 10:57:37+00:00): Theres still some weirdness with relations here.
Fraxi (2026-02-01 11:29:37+00:00): Hi!
In Bulgarian we don't add "ул." in the name. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bg:WikiProject_Bulgaria#%D0%98%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B8_%D0%B8_%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B4%D0%B8
I fixed it.
Manuel H (2026-02-14 12:02:09+00:00): Hallo,

ich war da vor 2 Monaten und wollte gerade Notizen nachpflegen und sehe, dass du hier gerade viel geändert hast.
Wird die alte Ruine wirklich als Grundstein für einen Neubau genutzt, wie es das Tagging suggeriert? Allen Artikeln nach soll das alte Haus abgerissen werden.
Und wurden die Wege um das Gebäude entfernt?

MFG,
Manuel
Busbahnhof (2026-02-14 12:07:04+00:00): Hallo Manuel,
ich habe mit reichlich Verzögerung nach meinem letzten Besuch die Karte aktualisiert, damals war gerade der Wald abgesägt und alles wurde plattgemacht. Kann sein, dass das Hauptgebäude selbst auch weichen muss, da war ich mir aber nicht sicher.
Danke und beste Grüße!
Manuel H (2026-02-14 12:14:30+00:00): Wann war denn der letzte Besuch? Ich war am 16.12. da und da standen die Ruinen des kleinen Hauses vor dem Albrechtshaus und das größere Haus im Osten noch.
Busbahnhof (2026-02-14 12:25:54+00:00): Laut Volksstimme wird tatsächlich alles abgerissen: https://www.volksstimme.de/lokal/wernigerode/brandstiftung-harz-albrechtshaus-abriss-ferienpark-4007739
Manuel H (2026-02-14 12:34:56+00:00): Das hatte ich auch gefunden. Dann würde "ruins" halt noch passen für das Haupthaus, wenn es noch steht.
Bzgl. der anderen entfernten Objekte: Du warst also nach dem 16.12. da und die Weg und die anderen Gebäude waren bereits entfernt/abgerissen?
silversurfer83 (2026-02-01 12:00:04+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OSM :)

danke, dass du hilfst die Datenbank aktuell zu halten.

Kannst du mehr zu dem Blitzer sagen? Du schreibst "Leer". Bedeutet das, dass hier auf längere Zeit keine Fotos gemacht werden können aber der Starenkasten noch vorhanden ist?

Grüße aus dem Waldecker Land
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177959660
0verdrive (2026-02-01 12:32:21+00:00): Hallo! 

Sehr gerne! 
Ja, es ist seit Jahren nur noch ein leerer Kasten ohne Kamera. Ich fahre dort jeden Tag lang, wenn sich da doch etwas ändert, könnte ich es sofort melden.

Viele Grüße aus Warburg
Moritz
silversurfer83 (2026-02-01 15:17:50+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung :)

Dann pass ich das mal entsprechend an. 

Falls du Fragen rund um OSM hast, schau einfach mal in Forum unter c.osm.org oder in der Signalgruppe unter https://signal.group/#CjQKIDw9atcGlqVHpUOvmQG4nqYBuWWxw44lD0Os5Zoe5A39EhD4z39uaKDvTim-TnNf21RA vorbei

Schönen Sonntag
silversurfer83
0verdrive (2026-02-01 21:32:16+00:00): Super, vielen Dank!

Guten Start in die Woche!
Vg Moritz
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 23:18:40+00:00): Split POI from building, cleaned up SEO spam, fixed tags, and added missing top-level tagging for POI "OMEGA Company" in changeset 184371115

https://osm.org/changeset/184371115
Makeena (2026-03-01 13:00:16+00:00): Your changesets are missing a source. Some items can not be quickly verified. For example, HIT-HOT does not exist according to the official documentation: https://ethz.ch/en/campus/getting-to-know/cafes-restaurants-shops/gastronomy/restaurants-and-cafeterias/hoenggerberg.html
George Sears (2026-02-01 20:14:28+00:00): Ciao, quello che hai rimosso non era un passaggio a livello, infatti era taggato con tunnel=yes, probabilmente un piccolo sottovia. Sei sicuro che non ci sia più?
bxl-forever (2026-02-03 16:10:05+00:00): Hello,

Is "Lijn 66" the official name of the bus stop you edited in Portugal?

It seems like you are referring to the route number using it, whereas the *name* is probably something else.
C_1965 (2026-02-03 15:54:49+00:00): Hallo Ricbaral,
der neu eingezeichnete Downhill-Trail kreuzt auf OSM im oberen Drittel einen eingezeichneten Zaun. Was ist da jetzt in der Natur vorhanden?
Danke und Gruß!
Ricbaral (2026-02-03 16:24:03+00:00): Hi C_1965, ich war am Samstag mit dem MTB-Verein vor Ort und habe den neuen Trail mit freigeräumt. An der Stelle verläuft (aktuell) kein Zaun und ich vermute, dass es sich um einen Kartenfehler handelt oder der Zaun abgebaut wurde. Es gibt einen Zaun an der Kante zum ehemaligen Steinbruch, aber der verläuft direkt an der Kante und ist hier auch grau eingezeichnet.
VG
Leo Slager (2026-02-01 23:51:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
osmviborg (2026-02-03 19:34:10+00:00): 'turning lanes' Giber Ringvej/Landevejen ser skummel ud. 'O3' på E45, er Vejdirektoratet med på den?
atcomapper (2026-02-03 20:56:21+00:00): O3 relationen har jeg ikke rørt, den er uændret. Men ifølge Wikipedia er det rigtigt nok at O3 går hele vejen ud til afk 16 af Djurslandmotorvejen
osmviborg (2026-02-04 07:23:50+00:00): debris fjernet https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178081171
David_Mapping (2026-02-01 12:26:36+00:00): Also to add removed the hairdressers and cafe. Both have closed several years ago. The petrol station has taken over the hairdressers and expanded into it and the cafe was taken over by care sales
bikepiper (2026-02-01 13:04:30+00:00): "sign", not "sigh" >.<
ivanbranco (2026-02-01 13:13:04+00:00): I thought the low speed limit made you sad lol
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-01 21:53:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89833251

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
sheldonelectric (2026-02-01 22:26:33+00:00): I copy/pasted the address from the website of which I provide the link. Please stop your bot from commenting on my changesets.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-01 22:53:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89833251

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Liuterlanian (2026-02-07 13:19:40+00:00): 您好，天津地铁10号线江湾二支路站的D1出入口是龙湖天街的下沉广场，由步行区域通向商场的地下一层，图上位置并不存在地铁出入口，高德等地图的标注是错误的。
Orlppor (2026-02-07 15:49:28+00:00): 您好，已经进行更正  非常感谢您的指正
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-02-01 12:44:44+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 177906150, 177906255, 177906300, 177906543, 177906623, 177906713, 177916769, 177916829, 177916849, 177916870, 177916892, 177935356, 177935386, 177935416, 177935478, 177935501.
SomeoneElse (2026-02-01 12:53:57+00:00): If anyone would like to discuss this with the DWG please email data@openstreetmap.org with a subject line of “[Ticket#2025102210000455] 177962210” .
pangoSE (2026-02-01 15:21:15+00:00): snyggt!
gnlpfth (2026-02-01 19:15:08+00:00): Hi,

wurde das wirklich so benannt? Ich weiß dass das bei den Verkehrsmeldungen der WL drin steht, aber unterm Strich ist die Neustiftgasse woanders. Eine Kreuzung von Burggasse und Neustiftgasse gibt es gar nicht. Und im Fahrplan vom 5er gabs auch keine Änderung. LG
emergency99 (2026-02-01 22:14:57+00:00): Sollte wohl Kaiserstraße, Burggasse heißen. Habe es ausgebessert.
Marek-M (2026-02-05 20:44:17+00:00): Pasy na jezdni nie mogą być rysowane oddzielną linią. Usunąłem Twoją fikcyjną drogę w tej okolicy https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/49.988585/18.954270
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178157211
HantDX (2026-02-01 17:48:05+00:00): А по какой причине вы удалили name данных маршрутов и изменили другие поля?