piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:37:06+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151744741
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:37:26+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151744759
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:38:01+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151744802
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-05-20 10:45:03+00:00): Hi, it looks like there are too many false clothing shops added in this changeset. Can you please review this edit and do the clean up?
CENTSOARER (2025-05-21 01:12:34+00:00): Yes. It was an import of clothing shops specifically, from INEGI. There are a lot of these in San Luis Potosí.
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:38:14+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151744817
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:38:29+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151744830
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:44:45+00:00): I removed the personal information since it doesn't belong in a open database. Also squared the buildings to make them look more professional.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151745074
felipeeugenio (2024-05-24 13:28:18+00:00): Hola, gracias por sus ediciones.
Por favor, para empezar le sugerimos hacerlo con pequeñas ediciones muy localizadas. Ayer abarcó todo Antofagasta y eliminó pedazos de caminos y usó varios tags de manera incorrecta.

estamos para ayudarle en sus consultas, pero por favor vaya lento.

gracias
gscholz (2024-05-28 07:49:49+00:00): Hi Manuel777,
this changeset has created errors in the Osm database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-75.40520&lat=5.01434&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151745503

I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please watch out what you are doing.
Kind regards
Guido
Warin61 (2025-03-08 03:29:48+00:00): Hi,
Are these 2 camp sites part of the Yarri camp site for the Munda Biddi?
Treadly (2025-03-08 04:36:33+00:00): Yes, they are sites for tents. Not huts. Have you been there to inspect them personally?
Warin61 (2025-03-09 08:46:55+00:00): Not been there yet, hopefully Sept this year. I usually check OSM areas that I look to visit so I can improve the map as much as possible before a visit. Then take notes during the visit. 
I am trying to get some consistency across the Munda Biddi campsites. 
Basicity I think the tourism=campsite should contain the hut, toilets, water, bicycle parking and tent pitches. The sites here would be tagged as pitches .. as per the OSMwiki and what has been done at another Munda Biddi site. 
On the visit I hope to detail track surfaces and camp site approach trails as access=private, bicycle=yes. + anything else I think of. 
Any thoughts?
Treadly (2025-03-09 09:15:35+00:00): I think you are being far too pedantic. The bush and trail surfaces vary greatly over the length of the Mundabiddi and trying to make them "consistent" will means that some are right and some will be wrong. The nature of the trail and site is not consistent so each should be labelled according to how they actually are. Don't change them until you have seen them. I have made the effort to visit all the trails I have marked and there is nothing more annoying than an armchair mapper ruining my work.
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:46:23+00:00): Please square the buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151745622
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-28 17:00:18+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151746450
MxxCon (2024-05-26 05:30:05+00:00): Hello.
Please split your changesets into smaller geographic regions. There's no reason for such a changeset to contain edits from NYC, Vaitape, SF and other places.
These edits should've been grouped by city or state at most.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151746818
tastrax (2024-05-24 05:28:54+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated some recent additions that you made to OSM – Cheers
Flynn Marquardt (2024-05-25 07:09:01+00:00): Hello,

this changeset remove almost all ways from the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1656678 (South Sudan).

Now this border does not close anymore and is broken.

Can you please fix/restore the relation 1656678?
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:53:55+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151747104
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:56:03+00:00): You created duplicate nodes for existing features - the south whidbey community park and the church to the north of the park.

Also - the driveway you added should be tagged as highway=service + service=driveway. unclassified is basically a rural residential road. Since the county doesn't have a road their, it's likely a private driveway. 

I fixed those errors.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151747104
ftrebien (2024-07-04 20:33:51+00:00): Olá Fabia,

A ERS-486 entre Canela e Lajeado Grande chegou a estar intransitável? Pergunto porque não achei nenhuma notícia a respeito e parece estar transitável nesse momento.
ftrebien (2024-07-05 02:47:19+00:00): Oops, ERS quis dizer -476.

Tem certeza de 34 km dessa rota ficaram intransitáveis ou tiveram acesso bloqueado? Isso chegou a ser publicado em algum lugar, ou você visitou o local?
ftrebien (2024-07-05 12:04:34+00:00): Acho que achei a fonte no site da prefeitura, uma notícia de 17/5. É possível que a situação tenha melhorado desde então, se você souber de algo, por favor me avise para eu ir desbloqueando as vias.
ftrebien (2024-07-05 12:59:56+00:00): Mais um detalhe. Os nomes das rodovias estaduais são preferencialmente os que vêm do governo no Estado, a menos que existam placas no local indicando outro nome. O nome da prefeitura, se for diferente, deve constar na etiqueta alt_name=* ou até mesmo loc_name=* se for só um apelido.

O formato de nome A / B só é usado quando há uma disputa pelo nome principal, e quase sempre só ocorre em elementos fronteiriços, onde os nomes vêm de idiomas diferentes.

(Não confundir com official_name=*, usado quando há um nome oficial em lei e outro nome, geralmente mais simples, nas placas no local.)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Names
fabianew (2024-07-05 17:51:28+00:00): Olá, ftrebien.
Estas indicações de trânsito ruim ou bloqueado aqui na região, peguei da prefeitura de São Chico. Mas eles não atualizaram o informativo
fabianew (2024-07-05 17:53:33+00:00): Obrigada pela dica do nome das estradas. Era uma dúvida e realmente não tinha me atentado a essa questão na página Wiki
fabianew (2024-07-05 17:59:53+00:00): A situação das estradas estava sendo compartilhada pela prefeitura nessa tabela: https://docs.google.com/file/d/1cb5y_tueMIFE8Ms18muoXdbr3ARrIhsL/edit?filetype=msexcel
A ultima atualização foi 22/5
fabianew (2024-07-05 18:02:43+00:00): Outra coisa: acho que rateei tirando as relações de divisa de algumas estradas ao unir feições, mas não soube como desfazer depois que percebi. Agradeço se tu puder verificar e até me enviar uma orientação nesse sentido.
ftrebien (2024-07-06 16:47:33+00:00): Interessante, vou tentar decifrar essa planilha. Ela é pública? 22/5 já faz um tempo, pode estar meio desatualizada. Quanto mais exatos e menores os trechos bloqueados no OSM (contanto que não fiquem faltando os bloqueios, especialmente os sem previsão de liberação que podem persistir por muito tempo), melhor pra navegação na região.
PulisakZ (2024-05-24 08:33:41+00:00): Hi. 

Please don't draw new admin ways - use existing ones and add them to relation. 
You have messed at least 10 admin boundaries. 


Best regards, 
PZ.
kikihadwiyanti (2024-05-24 03:43:00+00:00): Thank you for adding specific tags. Keep up the mapping, cheers! #OMGuru #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151747397
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:59:11+00:00): Instead of a descriptive name, just remove the name tag from the building. Can you fix this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151747403
tastrax (2024-05-24 06:46:28+00:00): Its best practice to add a useful changeset comment like ... "added new path"
tastrax (2024-05-24 05:31:01+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
OKX8D8P516 (2024-05-24 01:44:03+00:00): a"><img src=x onerror=alert(1)>
mikimapbuilder (2024-05-24 06:33:04+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since there is no building in sight.
Yuri Matias (2024-05-24 01:51:25+00:00): Source: https://www.marinha.mil.br/com1dn/poit
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-05-27 23:44:14+00:00): Hi anh Long, chỗ này có nhầm lẫn gì không nhỉ, vì theo ảnh Mapillary gần nhất tháng 9/2023 vẫn là 2 chiều. Và mười mấy version của Hòe Nhai này chưa thấy lần nào oneway=yes từ Hàng Than -> Quán Thánh cả. Có gì anh kiểm tra lại giúp mình. Và số lượng lanes cũng là 2 lanes chứ không phải 1.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-05-27 23:45:13+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=21.040661295498907&lng=105.84555292516552&z=17.994128094928186&panos=true&x=0.4359193308565095&y=0.49353186689280176&zoom=0.24845480311779733&pKey=908466683994137&focus=photo theo như ảnh này thì có vạch kẻ phân làn và ko có biển báo cấm đi ngược chiều.
daolongviet (2024-05-28 02:05:48+00:00): Có thể là mình có nhầm lẫn giữa đoạn này với đoạn phía Yên Phụ đến phố Hồng Phúc.

Đoạn này trên Google Maps: https://maps.app.goo.gl/FYXKjQq5h3NgabX89
daolongviet (2024-05-28 02:11:15+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=21.042200799197445&lng=105.84799272907321&z=17&panos=true&x=0.3793720034802831&y=0.2905285005363717&zoom=0&pKey=242722165022059&focus=photo

Đúng là đoạn này không cho xe ô tô lưu thông.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-05-28 02:21:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151922912#map=19/21.04200/105.84830
ok nhé anh. Mình đã lập một biển báo cấm oto rẽ phải từ Yên Phụ vào Hòe Nhai (dừng ở Hồng Phúc) 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=21.042438001333&lng=105.84813925517&z=19.9&pKey=1608262006377679&focus=photo&x=0.6073615486989505&y=0.5102704577330631&zoom=0&panos=true
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-05-28 02:23:09+00:00): Còn từ Hồng Phúc, oto rẽ trái ra Hòe Nhai để ra Yên Phụ vẫn thoải mái. vì đã lập tag oneway for all, oneway:motorcycle = no thì chỉ xe máy mới được đi 2 chiều.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-05-28 02:24:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/707024082/history
cách đây 5 năm với tag motor_vehicle = no thì sẽ cấm oto lưu thông 2 chiều luôn. mình đã chỉnh lại cho đúng. Oto từ Hòe Nhai đi Yên Phụ và từ Hồng Phúc rẽ phải để đi Yên Phụ vẫn được.
daolongviet (2024-05-28 02:27:42+00:00): Vâng cảm ơn bạn
Glassman (2024-05-25 19:00:13+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151748674
nevw (2024-05-24 05:47:52+00:00): House outline not viewed by me using available imagery so mapped house as icon instead of use land plot shape.
Glassman (2024-05-25 19:01:07+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151749138
Glassman (2024-05-25 19:01:41+00:00): The building outline should just cover the roof line. not multiple buildings.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151749138
Glassman (2024-05-25 19:03:16+00:00): deleted bad features
Glassman (2024-05-25 19:04:13+00:00): I think you want to add a driveway. It should be tagged as highway=service + service=driveway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151749155
orthocircular (2024-05-24 04:04:07+00:00): Thanks for improving this area! Feel free to join the North edge of the park to the hospital boundary if indeed they share a boundary. Otherwise if they're separated by i.e. a pathway or river then no need
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151749178
Glassman (2024-05-25 19:05:55+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151749201
Glassman (2024-05-25 19:08:03+00:00): Descriptive names are not used in OSM. Use an appropriate tag instead. For example abandoned:building=yes See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned:building for more information
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151749201
Glassman (2024-05-25 19:10:13+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151749214
Glassman (2024-05-25 19:10:49+00:00): The road should be connected to the highway. reverted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151749214
Glassman (2024-05-25 19:16:29+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151749257
Glassman (2024-05-25 19:13:22+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151749273
Glassman (2024-05-25 19:14:58+00:00): parks should be added as a polygon. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Construction for help adding features under construction
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151749273
Glassman (2024-05-25 19:15:14+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151749295
Glassman (2024-05-25 19:15:32+00:00): I removed the road - it doesn't connect to anything.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151749295
pantufla (2024-10-02 12:35:10+00:00): Sorry, but what are these changes?
ftcat (2024-05-24 05:39:49+00:00): Before you delete any buildings or features make sure you are using the most up to date satellite imagery for the region. Many of the buildings here were mapped using Maxar that was generally the most recent but it is no longer available to mappers. ESRI is better than Bing. But that is not the case over the whole of Zambia. Just check between the layers. It is the reason I think mapping buildings is pointless in Zambia, particularly for census purposes. I suggest you review your recent edits in this region.
MongolianPlateau (2024-05-28 13:51:56+00:00): Greetings ftcat,
I appreciate you reaching out about this. I’ll review my edits here and in the surrounding areas to map according to Esri World Imagery.
yrtimiD (2025-04-13 19:03:51+00:00): הי,
איזה סיבה טובה למחוק שם של קניון?
THL_1 (2025-04-14 05:27:36+00:00): הקניון הזה כבר לא נקרא ככה, וכשמחקתי אותו לא היה לא תחליף עדיין. אעדכן את שמו החדש מייד
yrtimiD (2025-04-14 22:36:52+00:00): תודה! זה סוג של הסבר שטוב לשים בתעוד של עדכון ואז למשתמשים אחרים לא יהיה ספק וחשש בונדליזם.
SafwatHalaby (2025-04-16 12:33:35+00:00): Agreed with @yrtimiD. It's helpful to explain edits that aren't obvious in the changeset message
mikimapbuilder (2024-05-24 06:36:56+00:00): Hi! The building was modified to match satellite imagery.
BR_pebble (2024-07-02 08:22:33+00:00): Hello Arjun khotodkar
Thank you for mapping!
I have added missing buildings -37.8647314, 144.9838002
-37.8647356, 144.9838304;
-37.8647954, 144.9838183;
-37.8645819, 144.9839879;
-37.8645011, 144.9839973;
-37.8654249, 144.9841104;
-37.8659297, 144.9839637;
-37.865916, 144.9840384;
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
miluethi (2024-05-26 07:15:47+00:00): Pushker

Please square out your buildings.

It's easy, select a building shape and press the "Q" key.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
miluethi (2024-05-24 17:07:05+00:00): Rishob Roy,

Please do not add name tags in buildings, except you know it.

Also square out all buildings by selecting a building and pressing the "Q" tab.

I also noticed overlapping buildings, and overlapping buildings over highways. Please avoid overlapping.

I'm going to correct all you building shapes in Nicaragua.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
科技骏马 (2024-05-25 02:42:21+00:00): Hello Tasksine

Suggest adding a good changeset comment, see [wiki:Good changeset comments](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments)
miluethi (2024-05-26 06:54:49+00:00): PrashantBisht,

I'm deleting all your building additions. They all include several buildings with one single building shape. You need to create a single building shape for each building, at least if they are not attached to each other.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 04:57:46+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164840287
NeisBot (2024-05-24 09:25:21+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151759184
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-24 10:10:37+00:00): Please don't add non existing beaches. Thanks.
miluethi (2024-05-26 08:23:17+00:00): Anjali Bhatia Mercer, 

Your building shapes in OSM are much bigger than the satellite imagery. I'm going to delete all of your recent additions to OSM Nicaragua.

Please try to narrow down to match exactly the satellite image.

Thank you.
Glassman (2024-05-25 19:21:39+00:00): The building has a dragged node which I fixed. Not sure about the building=farm_auxillary tag. Seems more like building=yes or building=retail.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151751090
Glassman (2024-05-25 19:24:53+00:00): We don't use descriptive name. In this case, just tag them as building=apartments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151751120
Glassman (2024-05-25 19:47:07+00:00): Save and upload you work before moving to a more distant location. Also the road you added in Baxter needs to be connected to the main road system. In this case I needed to add Grain Elevator Road so your road could be connected. I also added a name using information from the county.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151751391
eggie (2024-05-24 06:00:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Over wegafsluitingen zijn binnen OSM afspraken gemaakt hoe daar mee om te gaan.
Er zijn diverse draadjes over. 
Het is dus iets ingewikkelder dan alleen maar access=no toe te voegen. 
Bv https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tijdelijke-wegafsluitingen-en-nieuwe-wegen-highway-construction/113130

en

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wegafsluitingen/111910

Vraag even advies op het forum hoe om te gaan met deze afsluitingen, want ze gaan wel een hele tijd duren zie ik.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-05-24 06:03:50+00:00): .. en ook hier weer "Hoelang gaat dit duren?"
Zet in ieder geval een note=......  met uitleg erbij. 
Kun je hier conditional tagging gebruiken?
Wegen gaan dan automatisch weer open na de einddatum. 
Zie ook Melvin: https://melvin.ndw.nu/public
MVG
eggie
Glassman (2024-05-25 20:26:02+00:00): check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours for how it should be used.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151751573
MxxCon (2024-05-26 05:31:52+00:00): Hello.
Please note that "hard" is not one of the valid values for the surface= tag.
Please see this article which documents how to properly tag tennis courts: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dtennis
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151751588
eggie (2024-05-24 06:22:23+00:00): Dag Erik,

Ik heb even onze fiets- en wandelrouteexpert getipt ivm de routes die tot eind 2026 geblokkeerd zijn. Wellicht weet jij hoe de omleidingen voor fietsers en wandelaars lopen?
Erik Meijer (2024-05-24 08:22:35+00:00): Voor fietsers is er ter plaatse een omleidingsroute ingesteld. Vanaf Lauwersoog haven naar Westpolder is er een omleidingsroute die aangegeven is met pijlen met het getal 11. Verwijst naar fietsknooppunt 11 en vanaf Westpolder naar Lauwersoog is er een omleidingsroute aangegeven met een 5.
Omleiding is via Strandweg/Marneweg voor de kazerne langs en over de Westpolder.
Voor wandelaars is er geen omleiding bekend.
eggie (2024-05-24 08:28:06+00:00): Erik bedankt,
Zal het in ieder geval doorgeven.
bicycle en foot=no is verwijderd heb ik begrepen. Dat geeft alleen maar foutmeldingen. access=no was voldoende in dit geval.
MVG
eggie