piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
iandees (2026-03-30 00:49:50+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8412693008 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180607758, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
NeisBot (2026-03-29 22:24:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13689809236 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Millcreek Mall"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-06 22:33:12+00:00): 👍 Thank you for removing the text by https://osm.org/changeset/180605947
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:02:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:58:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
eerib (2026-03-30 02:20:20+00:00): Reverted - Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180609042
dsaneus (2026-04-09 06:21:50+00:00): Buenos días.
He revertido este conjunto de cambios, puesto que es incorrecto que la línea 352 (Murcia-Cartagena) esté fuera de servicio. Se están realizando obras de la LAV en buena parte del trazado, que afecta a los servicios de esta línea, pero no se ha suspendido la circulación.
Un saludo,
~dsaneus
Patrick1977Bln (2026-04-09 17:41:57+00:00): Hola,
Te has adelantado. Yo mismo lo habría corregido.

Saludos 
Patrick
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-06 02:46:19+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182274668
mueschel (2026-04-27 18:35:03+00:00): Is this really correct? Are there really 10000 hairdressers in this small area, and more than 30 separate ones in some buildings?

Also: Please make sure you follow our Import Guidelines - what is the source of all this data, where is the mandatory documentation of the import?
ChangwooRyu (2026-05-02 14:06:35+00:00): 이미 있는데 추가해서 중복된 것, 이미 오래전에 폐업한 곳 투성이.
ChangwooRyu (2026-05-02 14:10:35+00:00): 게다가 아마 업종 분류상 미용실이라서 다같이 미용실로 추가하신 모양인데, 네일샵, 마사지샵, 속눈썹샵 등은 shop=beauty 에서 beauty 태그로 처리됩니다.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-06 02:47:58+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182274698
❤️‍🔥 (2026-04-01 08:46:41+00:00): do u think it's time to change the busway and cycleway from proposed to construction around here?
applecuckoo (2026-04-01 18:20:06+00:00): yeah, for the cycleway in particular they've already laid down concrete from the Burswood Drive side to somewhere behind the depot
NeisBot (2026-03-30 01:27:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 18 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/685252047 v2 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1494107209 v1 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1494107211 v1 | 4 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180608248
James_OWORNTE (2026-03-30 07:58:29+00:00): Thank you for your contribution! The task was well mapped. I made some minor addition. Once again, thank you for your participation!
macintoshmarty (2026-07-20 01:50:00+00:00): This change doesn't allow services that pull from OpenStreetMap (I.e. DoorDash/walmart) to deliver to these areas.
chiho_kang (2026-04-10 11:18:17+00:00): 안녕하세요. addr 필드가 정리되어 있지 않아 토론글 남깁니다. 서울특별시의 경우 addr:province가 아닌 addr:city, 자치구(강동구 등)의 경우 addr:district로 설정하여야 합니다.

아울러, addr:housenumber를 제대로 정리하지 않은 채로 업로드를 하셨는데, 데이터 import 전에 OSM에서 요구하는 양식이 맞는지 확인 부탁드립니다.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-06 02:49:58+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182274746
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-30 05:59:31+00:00): Hi,

I saw that some name:* tags were removed. Could you explain why those were deleted?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/207629929
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31260949

Thanks.
albert9th (2026-03-30 23:34:14+00:00): This information was compiled based on the route changes announced by the Gunma Prefectural Government.

Please see the following page.
Please correct any errors.

https://www.pref.gunma.jp/page/749323.html
kylor (2026-04-03 07:06:39+00:00): "being renovated" is not the name of the store. please stop naming things with their incorrect names
ajmat (2026-03-31 08:11:30+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 180660388
citrula (2026-03-30 16:16:27+00:00): do these roads actually prohibit pedestrian access? foot=no is for legal restrictions
MassCartog (2026-03-30 13:02:56+00:00): Hello again, please stop removing valid features.

You now should be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Contiuniueing to do this is considered vandalism.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property
MassCartog (2026-03-30 13:02:47+00:00): Hello again, please stop removing valid features.

You now should be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Contiuniueing to do this is considered vandalism.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property
L28F422 (2026-03-30 22:05:25+00:00): You clearly have too much time on your hands.  It does not exist! Clearly you don't live in or around here.
MassCartog (2026-03-30 22:39:29+00:00): You don't have hobbies? Yes it does exist, don't be a vandal and a liar. https://i.imgur.com/wPH15cv.png
Dantine (2026-03-30 06:17:18+00:00): Hi SpamLee,

Thanks for the edit.

This change has reverted the intersection to an older layout. The roundabout was the former arrangement. The current permanent configuration was delivered as part of the Coomera Connector Stage 1 North / Shipper Drive works and opened in late 2025.

The previous mapping I added reflected that completed permanent arrangement, so restoring the older roundabout does not match the on-ground layout. This is one of those locations where older Bing imagery can be misleading because the road configuration changed recently. The current Esri imagery shows the completed configuration.

If needed, I’m happy to help verify against more recent sources, but this intersection should remain mapped in its post-project form rather than the former roundabout layout.

Thanks again for contributing and for requesting review.
SpamLee (2026-03-30 22:38:15+00:00): My apologies for making a bad edit. I was working with some Queensland government data and noticed the difference. I checked google maps to verify the location and found both the satellite imagery and street view matched a round a bout pattern. https://www.google.com/maps/place/Finnegan+Way+%26+Foxwell+Rd,+Coomera+QLD+4209/@-27.8530462,153.3281538,3a,75y,289.64h,76.75t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sl0l3qyuk4n-EZ8RMBHPIHw!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D13.247880888132968%26panoid%3Dl0l3qyuk4n-EZ8RMBHPIHw%26yaw%3D289.641650807641!7i16384!8i8192!4m6!3m5!1s0x6b9113c744df7fe3:0x24ed663d36c387c4!8m2!3d-27.8529076!4d153.327888!16s%2Fg%2F11xzdvrb98?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDMyNC4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
FajrAl (2026-03-30 16:15:54+00:00): Apakah memang Jalan Tol 6 Ruas Dalam Kota Jakarta sudah selesai dibangun dan resmi dibuka? Jika belum, changeset ini akan berpotensi dipulihkan.
f_husni (2026-03-31 10:17:44+00:00): hallo mas idham. saya pernah lewat jalan tersebut dan belum ada konstruksi bangunan nya sama sekali. sepertinya itu salah tag
FajrAl (2026-04-01 04:12:59+00:00): telah dipulihkan dalam changeset/180700294
f_husni (2026-04-02 04:09:50+00:00): ok terimakasih mas
FajrAl (2026-03-30 16:18:56+00:00): Apakah memang Jalur MRT Jakarta Jalur Timur-Barat sudah selesai dibangun dan resmi dibuka? Jika belum, changeset ini akan berpotensi dipulihkan.
FajrAl (2026-04-01 04:13:16+00:00): telah dipulihkan dalam changeset/180700294
NeisBot (2026-03-30 04:12:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1460424757 v1 | 12 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13394469969 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180610954
iandees (2026-03-30 13:39:44+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13394469969 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180630879, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
ajmat (2026-03-31 05:29:54+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 180655662
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Wildsharky (2026-04-01 12:43:23+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180656847
NeisBot (2026-03-30 04:30:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1460424757 v2 | 12 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180611234
NeisReview (2026-04-07 04:33:02+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180700481
NeisBot (2026-03-30 04:45:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/8457971829 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Pressure washing facility"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-07 10:33:06+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180990469
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Glassman (2026-03-31 01:55:02+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180611515
nevw (2026-03-30 06:45:06+00:00): Hi, can you check later imagery like Esri and Mapbox as some of the buildings appear to have been demolished. e.g. 10 Snedden  Drive
thopf (2026-03-30 11:02:24+00:00): I guess, it's not a post box for the public, to give letters to a post (wo)man / post office. It's a private letter box, to receive letters from the post? Am i right? So, in this case, use the tagging amenity=letter_box, NOT amenity_post_box.
Negreheb (2026-03-30 23:23:18+00:00): Servus BohdanF, schön, dass du mitmachst. Aber ich denke, es wäre gut, wenn die Gebäude eingezeichnet werden und nicht der Briefkasten. Ausserdem nutzt du hier die post_box, das ist ein Briefkasten der Post, wo man seine Briefe einwerfen kann. Das ist so nicht korrekt. Zudem sollte da kein "name" dazu. 

Ich hoffe, dass wir das rasch klären können :)
Glassman (2026-03-31 01:56:39+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: YOu can also align the imagery in the editor to correct offsets. Just look under the background layer icon on the right side of the editor.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180611766
FajrAl (2026-03-30 16:44:34+00:00): Beberapa sudah ada relasi desanya, contoh: way/317476470, jadi akhirnya duplikat.
NeisBot (2026-03-30 05:12:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13690260553 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Medical spa"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-30 10:33:08+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
NeisBot (2026-03-30 05:16:25+00:00): 🌍 Selamat datang di OSM, Staatsspoor.
Terima kasih telah berkontribusi!

Untuk memudahkan kolaborasi dan membantu orang lain memahami perubahan yang kamu lakukan, sebaiknya tambahkan deskripsi singkat tentang perubahan yang kamu buat. Komentar yang jelas membantu komunitas mengikuti pekerjaanmu dan memberikan umpan balik yang lebih baik. Kamu bisa menemukan tips untuk menulis komentar yang baik di sini[1].

✅ Berikut adalah contoh komentar berdasarkan perubahan peta yang kamu lakukan: "Menambahkan jalur kereta api yang tidak digunakan, menamai rute sebagai Bekas Rel Lori PG Jenar"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, Staatsspoor.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added disused railway, named a route as Bekas Rel Lori PG Jenar"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-31 10:24:53+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180654049
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
MappingMore (2026-03-30 12:35:20+00:00): Partially Revert of 180600298
sembelst134 (2026-04-07 07:19:59+00:00): Hello, can you please explain the reason for your change?
According to the wiki, attraction=summer_toboggan is a cart that rides freely down a long chute. (e.g. way/48537566)
The Othal Coaster (https://othal.de/winter/aktiv/othal-coaster/) is a cart fixed to tracks and therefore attraction=alpine_coaster
I mapped this as defined in the wiki: node for the attraction and way with roller_coaster=track
Maybe consider reverting your change or declare how it matches the wiki definition.
Thanks
Kookykooky (2026-04-08 07:54:42+00:00): Hi,
ok, I looked at it, according to the OSM wiki it should be attraction=alpine_coaster https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:attraction%3Dalpine_coaster . I edited it.
Thanks for the warning
Adéla #mapycom
sembelst134 (2026-04-08 10:24:12+00:00): Hi,
the wiki says:
- NODE or AREA with attraction=alpine_coaster: node/13575533993
- WAY with roller_coaster=track which means do not use oneway=yes (or bridge): way/1348737449 
- leisure=track is wrong!

I've fixed it back to the correct version, so no need for you to edit it again.
Glassman (2026-03-31 02:04:32+00:00): #TIP: save an upload before moving to another location.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180613251
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
rempshaener (2026-03-30 18:23:15+00:00): Wie bereits hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178978346 geschrieben: Das Löschen ist nicht gerechtfertigt.
Ich habe noch ein access=no ergänzt, in Kombination mit informal=yes ist alles Notwendige veranlasst.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-31 10:24:40+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180654049