piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PizzaTreeIsland (2026-05-16 10:40:07+00:00): Hello, 
thank you for adding all the wikidata tags! For some reason, some of them have the invisible unicode symbol U+2069 at the end. It is not a big problem most of the time, but some data consumers might have issues processing the data. For example, in the ID editor, the wikidata filed stays empty instead of displaying the usual title, description, and identifier field. 
I don't know enough about your process to find the issue, but it would be great if you could search for the cause yourself. In the meantime, I am in the process of cleaning up these cases. 

I found these by querying overpass for nonstandard wikidata tag values with this query: [out:json][timeout:60000];nwr["wikidata"]["wikidata"!~"^Q[0-9]+(; ?Q[0-9]+)*$"];out center;

Thanks and happy mapping!
Dawid2849 (2026-05-31 23:33:42+00:00): Miałem w najbliższym czasie tam jechać i sprawdzić nawierzchnię, dzięki za zajęcie się tym :)
qumil (2026-06-08 14:28:54+00:00): Dzięki za dobre słowo i za wszystko. Musimy się kiedyś spotkać w terenie i wypić jakieś bezalkoholowe :)
rajdhani (2026-05-15 06:56:50+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 182682099
maro21 (2026-05-14 23:31:46+00:00): surface = dirt jest bardziej szczegółową wartością niż surface = unpaved.
felipeeugenio (2026-05-21 13:07:39+00:00): Hola Leticia. por favor dibujar la base de las estructuras. Esas puntas que dibujas son los techos.

Saludos
Wildsharky (2026-05-18 03:54:30+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:182809593
Piotr Strębski (2026-05-21 06:38:03+00:00): Proszę dodawać konkretne opisy dokonanych zmian, wielo-wielokropek nie należy do tego typu opisu. Pozdrowienia
Piotr Strębski (2026-05-21 06:41:06+00:00): Odnośnie zmiany charakteru drogi Cicha, z dojazdowej na polną/leśną - jest to błąd, bowiem Cicha prowadzi do zabudowań (budynki z numerani, które widać na mapie), a to wyklucza użycie wartości track. Proszę o poprawienie poprzez przywrócenie wartości na service.
XOPTIX7 (2026-05-21 07:43:59+00:00): Ok. Dzieki bardzo za wskazowki. Pozdrowienia.
felipeeugenio (2026-06-30 22:13:53+00:00): Hola Leticia. 
Se dibuja la base de la casa, no el techo. Todas esas puntas que dibujaste son el techo, pero la casa no tiene esas puntas.

Además, puedes cuadrar las estructuras con la letra Q.

Saludos
LeticiaB (2026-07-01 02:15:00+00:00): Hola Felipe
Dale, gracias. Tomaré cuidado para los proximos
ajmat (2026-05-17 04:53:29+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 182766558
felipeeugenio (2026-05-15 11:53:55+00:00): Hola Zorka.
Dos temas
1) por favor cuadrar las estructuras con la letra Q. se nota que están hechas a pulso estas.
2) dibujar la base de las estructuras. No el techo. Se nota en unas puntas que dibujaste, que es el efecto de la punta del techo, pero abajo la estructura es recta.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182668949
Dimitar155 (2026-05-14 21:08:41+00:00): Здравей!

Инициативата е с добра кауза, но не е желателно да се отбелязват толкова краткотрайни събития. Виж https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features.

Поздрави,
Митко
Reiherhop 2 (2026-05-17 07:10:01+00:00): Das hat leider mehr geschadet als genützt. 

Hierdurch verschwinden die Linien die die einzelnen Parzellen kennzeichnen. Wir verwenden https://umap.openstreetmap.de um die Strom-, Telefon-, Wasserleitungen und Strom und Wasserzähler zu kennzeichnen, wenn die einzelnen Parzellen aber nicht mehr erkennbar sind, dann wird es sehr schwer sich zu orientieren.

Ich habe damals leider keinen anderen Parameter gefunden als landuse=allotment um diese Linien in der umap Karte anzeigen zu lassen, daher plädiere ich dafür diese Änderung wieder Rückgängig zu machen. Oder die OSM Programmierer müssen bei den Parametern für die Kleingärten nachbessern.
Reiherhop 2 (2026-05-17 07:13:12+00:00): Das hat leider mehr geschadet als genützt.

Hierdurch verschwinden die Linien die die einzelnen Parzellen kennzeichnen. Wir verwenden https://umap.openstreetmap.de um die Strom-, Telefon-, Wasserleitungen und Strom und Wasserzähler zu kennzeichnen, wenn die einzelnen Parzellen aber nicht mehr erkennbar sind, dann wird es sehr schwer sich zu orientieren.

Ich habe damals leider keinen anderen Parameter gefunden als landuse=allotment um diese Linien in der umap Karte anzeigen zu lassen, daher plädiere ich dafür diese Änderung wieder Rückgängig zu machen. Oder die OSM Programmierer müssen bei den Parametern für die Kleingärten nachbessern.
Dimitar155 (2026-05-20 14:31:21+00:00): Здравей,

Какъв точно е този ремонт? Не виждам да е обявено нещо на сайта на АПИ. Автобусите на градския транспорт също минават без проблем според онлайн картата.

Поздрави,
Митко
Termininja (2026-05-21 15:07:02+00:00): Здрасти, 
Ремонтът е огромен, минах с колело от там по целия път. Режат се дърветата от северната страна и се разширява платното, маха се стария асвалт, полагат тръби, правят укрепления и какво ли не. Не е затворен, използва се само от жителите на селата но в момента е в ужасно състояние заради ремонтните дейности. https://www.facebook.com/cokremikovci/posts/%D1%83%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B0%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B8-%D0%B6%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%83%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D1%8F%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B5-%D0%B2%D0%B8-%D1%87%D0%B5-%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B0-%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD-%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%82-%D0%BD%D0%B0-%D0%BF%D1%8A%D1%82-i-1-%D0%B2-%D1%83%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8A%D0%BA%D0%B0-%D0%BE/1894445784827712/
Termininja (2026-05-21 15:10:30+00:00): Яна - Елешница е в по-добро състояние все още и за това там може и автобуси да минават, асфалта не е махнат, карат от изток на запад основно, въпреки че по целия път се вижда как са почнали да го разширяват.
Dimitar155 (2026-05-21 16:03:37+00:00): Мерси за отговора!

Освен всички водопроводи, ще правят и нов мост в село Чурек. Предполагам е този, който добавих току-що.

Погледнах заданието и изглежда доста описателно, но все пак очаквах да обяват такъв ремонт, поне в бюлетина но и там нищо.

Заданието - https://www.api.bg/files/621f4dcea89ea0d69bc43923e16c14ef.pdf
Бюлетин - https://www.api.bg/bg/byuletin-ptna-obstanovka/21-05-2026-17-30.html
HurricaneGator (2026-05-28 16:21:09+00:00): Hello Termininja, 

I noticed that highway=construction was added to some primary and secondary ways between https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184622754 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/265884784. Since you mentioned the roads are not fully closed, but accessible to local residents, would you be in support of me updating these ways to access=destination and smoothness=very_bad, to better reflect the status of these ways? 

Thank you!
Termininja (2026-05-30 16:32:02+00:00): Thanks! Since the road is changing constantly during the reconstruction, these detailed tags will become outdated very quickly. I’m not sure it makes sense to update every small section right now.
HurricaneGator (2026-06-01 21:17:35+00:00): Hello Termininja,  

Thank you for the response. From a routing perspective, changing highway=construction to access=destination tagging would be very helpful for users trying to navigate. For example, drivers in Zhelyava cannot travel on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/143793890 due to highway=construction status which is preventing them from accessing nearby motorway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25477570. Similarly, drivers in Eleshnitsa and Potop cannot access the motorway via https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184619072 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489947592. This cartographically looks odd as well considering how many of these villages are functionally isolated. Let me know what you think.

Thank you!
user_5359 (2026-05-15 09:56:12+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13829174440. What is the mean of the tag  WEH219-3 = WIL013-1?
FL0815H (2026-05-15 10:11:55+00:00): Oops, my mistake—I meant to change the reference number. This number is assigned internally by the nature park to facilitate communication with the forestry offices and trail maintainers. I’m currently entering all the data that has been provided to me via GPX tracks. This allows them also to use OSM feedback for quality assurance.
dmjab13 (2026-05-15 17:19:16+00:00): please submit edits like this constrained to one continent or area. this changeset is egregiously wide
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-14 20:41:11+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/545213723

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Nakaner (2026-05-16 11:42:37+00:00): This changeset was reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182738027
silversurfer83 (2026-05-15 22:21:01+00:00): Moin Jonas,

weil Google in seinen Nutzungsbedingungen klar ausschließt, dass eines seiner Kartenprodukte für die Verbesserung anderer Karten genutzt wird.

Hessen DOP wird oft genug aktualisiert. Bis dahin halte ein Auge auf Hesse ALKIS und wenn das nicht hilft nimm dir nen Holzgliedermaßstab und peil das Gebäude nach bestem Wissen und Gewissen. Das passt dann schon, bis wir aktuelle Bilder haben :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182669930
andrewth1 (2026-06-08 03:43:40+00:00): Hi FCCMapper,

I have reverted this changeset due to your use of access=no on an obviously public road. Additionally, the access tags for foot, bicycle, and horse reflect signed legal restrictions and not subjective feelings of safety when using those modes of transportation. See here for more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot
FCCMapper (2026-06-14 17:08:38+00:00): Thanks for the correction. It’s clear no one should walk or bike here but I checked VA law and for signs and it looks like it is indeed vaguely legal (some doubt if crossing a highway on-ramp on foot outside a marked crosswalk is legal)
Nakaner (2026-05-16 11:42:43+00:00): This changeset was reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182738027
NE2 (2026-05-19 00:25:27+00:00): Reverted. Only trucks are charged a toll.
wolfgang8741 (2026-05-31 13:34:51+00:00): Looks like there are some missing tags on the lines in this or previous changeset for the township boundary and appear just as lines. See boundary transition at 39.436125, -81.430026
j0hn33y (2026-06-01 14:17:19+00:00): These lines where theoretical township boarders under the city limits of Marietta. Were being used to check alignments. I have now removed them.
wolfgang8741 (2026-06-27 19:26:29+00:00): Thanks for explaining. Not sure all were fixed, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1513777695#map=16/39.45614/-81.43785 remains not sure if there are others. Are any remaining untagged lines safe to remove?
steve032 (2026-05-14 21:26:09+00:00): Score card used: https://course.bluegolf.com/bluegolf/course/course/bridgeportccwv/detailedscorecard.htm
lonnez (2026-05-20 02:13:15+00:00): Hey. Can you provide your source for this? I was just here and don't remember this and it doesn't make much sense to have in the middle of a park.
lonnez (2026-06-15 23:37:38+00:00): Hey. I went by the park the other day and looked around quite a bit and didn't see any sign of the cameras. I removed them in 183994725. Could you clarify where you got this data from?
Glassman (2026-05-15 16:39:14+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182671548
eggie (2026-05-15 05:48:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Svp niet name=....  gebruiken om iets te beschrijven.
name=the Pier has been Renewed and chanshed

Let ook op dat je niet de plygoon van een vlak zoals van het water onderbreekt.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-05-15 05:53:21+00:00): Pier de juiste tag gegeven man_made=pier   name= Pier has been Renewed and chanshed verwijderd.
Mapse,
eggie
LingM (2026-05-18 06:56:48+00:00): Hallo Schäzle,

einen Poller erstellt man mit barrier=bollard, nicht amenity=poller. Habe das für den hier mal behoben.

Er sollte auch mit dem Weg, den er blockiert, verbunden sein, damit Routing-Programme die Beziehung verstehen. Ich kann aber nur vermuten, dass hier der Fußweg gemeint war.

Könntest du den Teil vielleicht noch anpassen?

~LingM
tomzyl (2026-05-20 11:58:59+00:00): Od Choczewa do Wejherowa dopiero ogłosili przetarg, więc jakie niby prace są prowadzone w terenie?
PCK46 (2026-05-20 19:36:33+00:00): Poprawiałem to co ktoś inny wprowadził. Najwidoczniej chyba przedwcześnie, ponieważ skrypt construction, ktoś wcześniej wstawił w poprzedniej edycji, a patrząc na zmiany to chyba był to użytkownik Szymson.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-14 22:01:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302928587

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Wildsharky (2026-05-18 03:50:40+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:182693906
Xvtn (2026-05-26 23:10:36+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Looking at your changes here, it looks partially good but there are also a few issues. The name tag is reserved for the actual name of the feature. Mapping notes and so on should go in note= or description=. Also, it looks like you've replaced some private access tags on this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1287823133 - Was that intentional? You may also reference this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182004558 - Looks like there are others concerned about this area.
steve032 (2026-05-14 22:19:22+00:00): Reference materials used:

Official score card: https://www.icycc.com/files/Scorecard%202024.pdf
https://www.icycc.com/files/2019%20Scorecard.pdf
Chalcroft (2026-06-19 15:33:00+00:00): Hallo JausG2, die Angabe zur Geothermieleistung ist falsch. Der auf der Webseite genannte Wert bezieht sich auf den jährlichen Energiebedarf für Wärme und nicht die stündliche Energieleistung. Das muss daher korrigiert werden.
Dimitar155 (2026-05-15 05:33:55+00:00): Hello BreadEnjoyer,

Thank you for your edit! Such separation into different lines of cycleways and footways is generally undesired, unless there is some physical separation.

When adding new sidewalks, it is good to also add sidewalk:side=separate on the corresponding road.

Happy mapping,
Dimitar
BreadEnjoyer (2026-05-18 12:28:19+00:00): Thanks for the tip. In this case there are separately drawn bike lanes and separately designated pedestrian areas. Honestly, I would have rather marked the whole sidewalk area and then just had bike lanes on top (where they exist), but unfortunately I'm not yet aware if that's even possible without adding a dedicated pedestrian path/sidewalk. to distinguish. Many sections across the city have slightly incorrectly drawn bike lanes because of the confusion which mixed bike and pedestrian paths cause.
Yuri Matias (2026-06-15 15:22:57+00:00): Qual é a vantagem de ser em ângulo ao invés de forward/backward?
FlavioAlCosta (2026-06-16 16:58:43+00:00): Simples, existem aplicativos para GPS que trabalham com grau decimal e não aceitam texto no campo direção.
__________--_--__________ (2026-05-14 23:28:34+00:00): J'espère que je n'ai rien trop brisé sur les alentours du parc. Au plaisir d'aider la communauté :)
infeeeee (2026-05-15 15:33:41+00:00): Szia!

Az ösvényeket mindig kösd be valamilyen útba, különben használhatatlanok az útvonaltervezők számára.

Műholdkpből a Mapbox és a FÖMI-k használata ajánlott inkább. Mapboxnál figyelni kell az elcsúszásra is. 

Ezeket javítottam itt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182704847

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség#Elérhetőségek

További jó térképezést!
rblst (2026-05-23 17:57:07+00:00): Szia!

Nagyon köszi a segítséget!
 
Látom, igazi, hardcore OSM-szerkesztő vagy (a wikilapod alapján), én meg csak egy lelkes amatőr – egyelőre.

Abban tudsz esetleg segíteni, hogy az openstreetmap.org-on a nature:tree_group miért nem jelenik meg? A kis rétre raktam kettőt – pontként és területként is próbáltam –, de semmi.
infeeeee (2026-06-01 10:27:55+00:00): Szia!

Az alapértelmezett megjelenítő neve Carto, bővebben róla itt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_Carto

Fejlesztése Githubon történik, itt is kell hibajegyet nyitni az esetleges megjelenítési problémákkal kapcsolatban: https://github.com/openstreetmap-carto/openstreetmap-carto/issues

A miértre válasz: mert még senki nem csinálta meg... Nyithatsz róla egy issue-t a fenti linken, és ott kaphatsz erre pontosabb választ is.

Nem túl sok projekt által támogatott címke ez amúgy, ilyeneket itt lehet megtalálni, hogy vajon mi jeleníti meg: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/natural=tree_group#projects

De nekünk szerkesztőknek nem szabad ezzel foglalkozni. Ne azért jelölj valamit egy adott címkével "mert megjelenik", hanem mert a valóságban úgy van. Majd a megjelenítők utolérnek minket idővel. Nagyon sok olyan dolgot jelölünk ami nem jelenik meg sehol, vagy csak nagyon specifikus megjelenítőkben.

Személyes véleményem, hogy ez a címke nehezen értelmezhető, mi számít csoportnak? Ha már van alatta aljnövényzet facsoport? Két fa egymáshoz nagyon közel már facsoport? Mi a határ a facsoport és az erdő között? Én sose használtam ezt emiatt, ilyeneket natural=tree , natural=scrub vagy landuse=forest címkékkel szoktam jelölni, helyzettől függően.

Ilyen általánosabb kérdéseket amúgy jobb lenne ha több embernek tennél fel, gyorsabban is választ kaphatsz, és több szerkesztő véleményét is hallhatod, nem csak az én okoskodásom. Fenti listából a Matrix szoba a legaktívabb, de levlistán is előfordulnak hasonló kérdések időnként.
Wildsharky (2026-05-18 03:52:31+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:182774856
dmlls (2026-05-17 08:34:02+00:00): Hola @editant,

¿Por casualidad sabes la ruta que sigue esta línea? Ahora mismo las relaciones son incorrectas porque solo incluyen las paradas.

Un saludo,
Diego
b-jazz (2026-05-17 02:20:22+00:00): RE: https://osm.org/way/1513864319

When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. Take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Golf.png for an example of the "Wrong" way to map a fairway and a green, along with the correct way. There are some cases where a fringe exists around a green and you should draw the fairway outline completely around a green, leaving room for the fringe. Other times, the fairway and green butt up against each other. In that case the fairway and green should share the same nodes at the boundary between the two, and every node at the boundary needs to be shared, leaving no gaps. When drawing these shared nodes, editors like iD (built into openstreetmap.org) will "snap" to an existing node if you get close enough. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out. Thanks.
Udarian (2026-05-15 02:58:21+00:00): looking at aerial imagery in the area it seems like these primary_link's you've been adding in the area seem to be incorrect, unless there has been construction in area since the latest imagery that added some kind of physical barrier these should not be mapped as geometry. This is made worse by the fact that the turn:lanes seem to already be tagged on the main centerline ways for the roads in the area. 

Happy mapping,
Udar.
DrDisaster (2026-05-15 11:57:27+00:00): I am open to undoing everything; I just need to figure out the best way how.
DrDisaster (2026-05-15 15:32:47+00:00): I stand corrected. Thank you for calling these tags to my attention, I have not seen them before in Ohio where I primarily do land use mapping. I see how you can designate turn lanes and bike lanes. Thanks again.
StreetSurveyor (2026-05-15 19:42:18+00:00): Lane count alone does not determine OSM highway classification. The OSM wiki defines highway=primary as “a major highway linking large towns.” In urban areas, it generally refers to major arterial routes that are important parts of the regional transportation network.

These airport roads primarily serve terminals, parking garages, rental car facilities, and airport operations rather than functioning as regional through routes. The wiki also notes that highway classification should be based on a road’s role in the network, not simply physical characteristics such as width or number of lanes. 

MassDOT functional classification also does not directly translate into OSM tagging. OSM maps the real-world function and usage of a road. Since these roads mainly provide internal airport access and destination traffic within airport property, highway=service is a more appropriate classification in my view.
cubbe8 (2026-05-15 19:46:40+00:00): These roads have high traffic counts. Service roads are meant to be roads that are not part of the public road network which is not the case here.
cubbe8 (2026-05-15 19:50:09+00:00): Also, almost all other airports around the country have their roads not tagged as service, they are based on the classification guidelines of the state.
StreetSurveyor (2026-05-15 20:53:00+00:00): Thanks for the debate—this actually pushed me to take another look at the MassDOT functional classification maps. Based on that, a number of these airport approach/terminal roads were indeed classified incorrectly per the state system.

I’ve updated the tagging to reflect that classification per the MassDOT data. Appreciate the discussion.
AngocA (2026-05-18 20:22:55+00:00): Hola JLOSM
Recuerda conectar los ríos y quebradas con otros cuerpos de agua.
Puedes ver los errores de mapeo de ríos y quebras aquí: https://geoserver.osm.lat/geoserver/WaterwayMap/wms?service=WMS&version=1.1.0&request=GetMap&layers=WaterwayMap%3AWaterwayMap%20ends&bbox=-180.0%2C-84.9938735961914%2C180.0%2C83.63228607177734&width=768&height=359&srs=EPSG%3A4326&styles=&format=application/openlayers (toma un tiempo en cargar)
JLOSM (2026-05-22 03:25:31+00:00): Hola AngocA,
Efectivamente toda corriente de agua debe quedar conectada con algún cuerpo de agua.
Por mi parte, las voy trazando de acuerdo a la(s) Hoja(s) referenciada(s) en cada conjunto de cambios, y uno a su vez, gran cantidad de las que se observen con claridad en la(s) imagen(es) de fondo: Las demás las dejo para terminar su trazado en otra ocasión, con la Hoja IGAC correspondiente.
El link que copiaste, con la observación "(toma un tiempo en cargar), realmente no abre en mi PC.
Carnildo (2026-05-19 18:01:22+00:00): When changing road classifications like this, and *especially* when changing something to/from "trunk", please consult with the community either on the forums or on the OSM US Slack instance.  "Trunk" has a specific usage, and US-2 out to Airway Heights doesn't meet that standard.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Compdude/Draft:Washington_highways for more information.
AriAlvarez (2026-05-22 23:46:33+00:00): FIgured it's a trunk due to: Favor a route which has the "best" continuity / connective value to the rest of the road network
Favor higher-speed bypasses built to allow through traffic faster passage through built-up area
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-28 13:14:39+00:00): Please, read and follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
1Raven (2026-05-15 05:37:28+00:00): Large edit area due to connecting residental area feature with nature reserve feature
fortera_au (2026-05-17 23:49:38+00:00): Hi, are those names signposted?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182678380