piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MichaPü (2025-05-23 11:59:48+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Sorry, da habe ich vergessen den alten Text rauszulöschen (ich über noch). Das war wohl in der Vergangenheit ein Weg, der durchaus zum Wandern genutzt wurde, das ist aber jetzt nicht mehr korrekt. Ein entsprechendes Bild von vor Ort werde ich hochladen.
timmito (2025-10-05 08:16:02+00:00): Hallo mainsprinter, du hast die Schule in einen Kindergarten geändert. Ich habe dies wieder berichtigt. Bitte nicht irgendwelche Vorschläge automatisch übernehmen. Siehe auch im Forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/id-schlagt-bei-von-der-stadt-hanau-betriebenen-schulen-anderung-von-amenity-school-zu-amenity-kindergarten-vor/136428/4
無限の刃 (2025-05-22 10:16:15+00:00): read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch
Taktaal (2025-05-23 13:11:27+00:00): sorry, I don't understand the error. Are those fields on the asphalt here not for sports? maybe 2 tennis and 1 football?
Taktaal (2025-05-23 13:12:36+00:00): and I think there is one basketball field too, in the west
無限の刃 (2025-05-25 06:53:04+00:00): Those area is not "designed for practising a particular sport", but line powder will disappear soon.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-07-23 01:27:38+00:00): reverted fake road

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169319117
seewäldler (2025-07-11 20:41:09+00:00): Hallo osmaccount!

Im ganzen Gebäude ist immer noch Baustelle, noch keiner der neuen Läden hat geöffnet. Was wolltest du mit dieser Änderung der Bäckerei eintragen?
osmaccount (2025-07-11 21:04:38+00:00): Hallo seewäldler,

das war nur eine Änderung der URL von http auf https (maproulette-Aufgabe).
Da die alte URL mit http eingetragen war und https auch funktioniert sollte diese Mini-Änderung doch OK sein.
Gibt es einen Grund für deine Nachfrage?
seewäldler (2025-07-12 10:40:32+00:00): Hallo osmaccount!
Die Änderung sah so aus, dass die Bäckerei auf einen 'aktuellen' Stand gebracht wurde. Hier wird aber schon seit inzwischen Jahren umgebaut und wie das nach dem Umbau aussehen soll hab ich noch nirgends gesehen, auch, ob es eine Bäckerei dann überhaupt noch geben wird. Drum fand ich die Änderung von k-und-u.com nach marktbaeckerei.de ein bischen seltsam, in einer Baustelle, die es seit Monaten gibt und die auch erst vielleicht später im Jahr fertig wird.
osmaccount (2025-07-12 11:19:09+00:00): k-und-u.com leitet ja auf die neue URL um. Ist die Frage ob es Sinn macht sowas bei einem geschlossenen Geschäft zu updaten, aber ich denke es schadet auch nicht. Entschuldige wenn ich Verwirrung gestiftet habe.
englu (2025-05-22 15:00:54+00:00): Tu akurat była pomyłka. Ale generalnie rzuć okiem na linki w zestawie zmian 165883456. Chodziło o przywrócenie błędnie ustawionych dostępów w parku narodowym.
silversurfer83 (2025-05-22 18:05:10+00:00): Hi

die Hausdurchfahrt westl. der Botschaft ist vmtl. eine "building_passage" [1]

der Flagpole sollte noch eine "location=roof" bekommen und ggf. einer "layer=1", da über dem building

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166587264
AndreaDp271 (2025-05-23 13:15:18+00:00): Ciao, come hai ottenuto la forma della strada in costruzione?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166587488
Armando Hasanbelliu (2025-05-23 19:48:47+00:00): Ciao, l'ho ottenuto con g maps
Armando Hasanbelliu (2025-05-23 19:51:09+00:00): Volevo chiederti se i semafori che ho messo sulla linea di arresto dell'attraversamento ferroviario sono corretti?
AndreaDp271 (2025-05-23 20:29:05+00:00): si, i passaggi a livello hanno i semafori, hanno il tag da passaggio a livello.
Comunque non potresti usare la roba in maps, c'è la questione del copyright, chiedi nel gruppo di openstreet
AndreaDp271 (2025-05-23 20:40:10+00:00): Quasi corretto, nella modifica hai perso il seguente dato: railway:position	30 + 512
Inoltre i semafori non sono sullo stop, ma proprio all'altezza della sbarra. Sugli stop sarebbe da mettere lo stop. Riesci a correggere tu?
Armando Hasanbelliu (2025-05-23 22:43:48+00:00): Certo, ho appena corretto, non ho aggiunto lo stop perché non penso sia corretto in questo contesto
silversurfer83 (2025-05-22 18:05:53+00:00): nach dem EInzeichnen die Taste "Q" macht die Häuser hübscher
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166587701
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-12 08:09:21+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8063706567/history has shop = tortilleria that was added in this edit
shop=tortilleria ? Should it be shop=tortilla proposed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:shop=tortilla ?

Is it amenity=fast_food or amenity=restaurant by any chance? Or are they selling pieces not ready to eat? Or ingredients? Maybe some https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine would be a good idea?
shinterro (2025-05-22 02:15:38+00:00): Hi MihanJhaveri, thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. I have some questions/comments regarding parts of this changeset.

I see you removed some service roads. Has something changed on the ground that is not reflected in recent imagery? If service access is still there but not publicly accessible, you might consider adding "access=private" to the way, rather than deleting. Adding a known service, such as "driveway" or "parking_aisle" can also be helpful.

There are a number of places where you are adding "wheelchair=unknown" to footways. As described in the wiki, "wheelchair" tags are most useful when backed by a strong source of truth, such as a nearby sign or personal experience. A value of "unknown" is not common or encouraged. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wheelchair

The above change also often removing "kerb", kerb descriptors, and "tactile_paving" tags. Fixing or removing these are fine if erroneous or if ground truth differs from imagery, however, broadly changing correct tags without backing support is generally discouraged.

Some changes are also adding "highway=crossing" to a node where a footway and crossing meet. This tag is better placed where crossings and highways meet - there are examples in this changeset (which incidentally have been marked as "crossing=uncontrolled" when there are "traffic_lights"). 

Some of your edits, like this one... are great! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1388652526.

It can take some time to get familiarized with common mapping practices. I am happy to answer questions, and we have a number of community forums and resources to help as well: https://openstreetmap.us/about/contact/.

Thanks!
MassCartog (2025-06-13 03:27:41+00:00): Hi shinterro, I open a thread about this editing group, if you are interested in helping document the issues with these changes for the DWG.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/georgia-tech-project-not-following-organized-editing-guidelines-making-mistakes-and-not-responding/131312/6
silversurfer83 (2025-05-22 18:07:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166624700
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166588065
bosboer (2025-06-01 09:01:53+00:00): Why replace wetland:=wet_meadow with wetland=reedbed? That doesn't match with the aeral photography.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2025-06-01 09:15:35+00:00): Moest idd maar op een kleiner stukje zijn, pas je terug aan?
bosboer (2025-06-01 09:45:31+00:00): OK
VictorIE (2025-05-24 11:14:11+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1388656449

I'm wondering if the eastern section of this is actually a road.
b-unicycling (2025-05-24 21:44:12+00:00): I think it is. I've changed it to highway=path, but on the BWO map, there is a farm along it that the path probably lead to.
SomeoneElse (2025-05-23 21:12:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12825008634/history looks like spam to me :)
CurlingMan13 (2025-05-22 03:39:44+00:00): Please update the node that is already there, rather than creating a new seperate node.

Most importantly, make sure the old business is removed so you arne't creating confusion.
MooPoo7 (2025-10-06 18:18:50+00:00): Please do not use the name=* tag to describe the feature.
MooPoo7 (2025-10-06 18:20:15+00:00): Also, please do not name features for personal projects. OpenStreetMap is a public, global database, and personal uploads affect everyone.
GPYes (2025-05-22 00:42:00+00:00): Correction: Comment is "Adjusted street name from Alameda dos Jamins to Alameda dos Jasmins based on Maps user feedback in Condomínio Canoas. #adt
Muokkaaja (2025-07-09 19:01:01+00:00): Kampinmäki/Kampinpolku, ei löydy  virallista tietoa nimistä. Ovatko paikallisia nimiä reiteille? Silloin tagi loc_name=*
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-30 21:50:12+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tag values

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183419664
APneunzehn74 (2025-08-09 12:27:37+00:00): Hallo, du hast hier eine ursprüngliche als Quelle eingetragen Knoten auf Trinkwasserzapfstelle geändert. Kann das korrekt sein?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dwater_point
Grüße APneunzehn74
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-30 21:44:20+00:00): Reverted SEO spam vandalism: adding SEO spam POI with malformed tag values as node on historic path

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183419508
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-30 21:40:26+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tag values as node on highway

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183419406
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-30 21:35:26+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tag values

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183419272
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-30 21:30:37+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tag values

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183419186
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-30 21:13:21+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tag values

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183418711
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-30 21:10:00+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tag values

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183418607
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-30 20:57:41+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed/promotional tag values and vandalism/deletion of existing objects

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183418280
Bienson (2025-05-22 01:28:59+00:00): ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/323553184
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-30 20:56:04+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tag values in changeset 183418056

https://osm.org/changeset/183418056
Tjuro (2025-05-22 04:41:29+00:00): Hello Money Moustache,

I see that you are adding poi's here.

In the Netherlands it is reccomended that you add poi's to the adress.

Greetrings,

Tjuro
Money Moustache (2025-05-22 23:10:57+00:00): Thanks Tjuro - I have put the POI tags on the address node now (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166632763)
marczoutendijk (2026-05-05 08:31:07+00:00): Reverted by: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182237933
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-30 20:44:25+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed/promotional tag values and other map vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183417917
sebras (2025-05-22 00:27:59+00:00): There is an ongoing discussion here, but I don't know how to connect the two: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2144763#map=15/55.58953/13.01964
aharvey (2025-05-22 03:12:59+00:00): hi in this changeset you converted a main Brisbane CBD road into a video wall, without further justification I've reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166591920
pwbriggs (2025-05-22 04:25:42+00:00): Thanks for the contribution. The website tag should specify a complete URL (including `https://`), and point to a page specific to this business location, if a business website has multiple locations. (The OpenStreetMap wiki is a really useful resource that documents how to use keys correctly-- see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website for the page about this tag)

I changed `thirdplacebooks.com` to `https://www.thirdplacebooks.com/seward-park`

But anyways, thanks for the contribution. Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
aharvey (2025-05-22 03:06:59+00:00): hi I'm not sure what you were trying to do here, but your change wasn't related to traffic signs and broke the Brisbane City and Spring Hill boundary relations.

I've reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166591839
NeisBot (2025-05-23 07:55:30+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-05-29 09:06:09+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/166909699
PerpetualHiker (2025-05-22 02:44:22+00:00): Lol, jk, the cat dune is already mapped as way 453539300.
joel56dt (2025-06-08 20:19:20+00:00): Hi akana932, I removed some of the Expo monorail you added since there are no visible remaining features. See the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Demolished_railways#What_is_sufficient_to_map_a_former_railway

Thanks,
Joel
Tommybara (2025-09-22 18:30:13+00:00): Cầu Gò Găng vẫn chỉ có 1 đơn nguyên. Xin bạn hãy xem thật kỹ dự án trước khi vẽ.
NeisBot (2025-05-23 07:55:33+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisRevert (2025-05-29 09:03:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/166909592 where the changeset comment is: 
Reverted data due to lack of response from the original contributor
NeisBot (2025-05-23 07:55:34+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-05-23 08:09:37+00:00): Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166596429
pwbriggs (2025-05-22 04:13:22+00:00): Also: address added based on https://gismaps.kingcounty.gov/iMap/.
Baloo Uriza (2025-07-24 15:08:13+00:00): There was no part of this changeset that's even close to being reflected on the ground.  Please stop lane tagging, Lyft clearly has no comprehension on lanes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166593182
tkotnala_lyft (2025-07-28 11:19:19+00:00): Hi Baloo Uriza,

My name is Tanya, and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for your comment.

As we mentioned in comments on other changesets: "Based on the wiki, we don't include bike lanes in the lane count because the highway=* key is mainly used for motorized traffic. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes#Crossing_with_a_designated_lane_for_bicycles) 
However, according to another article, your enhanced approach to tagging lanes is also applicable. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes#:~:text=lane%20for%20those.-,NOTE,-%3A%20Not%20settled%3B%20orthogonal) 
Given our understanding, both approaches can be used, but we shouldn't change one approach to another"

I appreciate you pointing out my mistake regarding the inaccurate edits of already existing tags. I will be more attentive in the future.

Best regards, Tanya
Baloo Uriza (2025-07-29 12:15:14+00:00): OK, now go back and look at your edit, and explain to me which lane is closed and which lane is a turn lane.  I'm not sure if you don't know what a lane is or if you didn't care at all how geometry works, because you got all of it wrong.
Baloo Uriza (2025-07-29 12:15:43+00:00): I'd also appreciate a more reasonable answer than the same template you've used as three other people now.  Human intelligence is required here.
tkotnala_lyft (2025-07-31 04:28:42+00:00): Hi Baloo Uriza,


I’ve mentioned in my comment that there are two contradictory approaches. Since you applied the edits using one of them, I shouldn’t change it to the other approach. So I highlighted that in the initial response. And as I mentioned before – I’ll be more attentive in the future on this matter. Thank you once again for pointing that out!


Best regards,
Tanya
NeisReview (2025-05-22 09:22:23+00:00): #DataImport

Hi, welcome to OSM!

With this changeset, you've added a significant number of features that appear to share similarities in their tags. Could you please let us know more about the source of your mapping activity? Is this a data import?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks!
캔디레인 (2025-05-22 23:59:34+00:00): Hello, thank you for your message.

The data in this changeset was mapped based on publicly available information provided by the Seoul Open Data Plaza (서울열린데이터광장).
Source: https://data.seoul.go.kr/

Please let me know if you need any further details. Thank you!
NeisReview (2025-05-23 05:34:02+00:00): Thanks for your response. I think it would be helpful if the data source were mentioned in the changeset. Is the data's license compatible with OSM?
캔디레인 (2025-05-23 05:40:17+00:00): I'm not sure if it's compatible or not. I received CVS file from Seoul Open Data Plaza, and I'm updating it to JOSM after editing it according to OSM's tag form. ^^;;
NeisReview (2025-05-23 05:49:15+00:00): The compatibility of the two data licenses should have been checked before the import. If your data needs to be removed, it will now require considerable effort.

Could you please clarify the license as soon as possible?
캔디레인 (2025-05-23 05:55:43+00:00): Seoul Open Data Plaza is a public data platform operated by the Seoul Metropolitan Government. The data provided by the platform is certified by a public institution and can be used by anyone. It can be used without a separate license.
NeisReview (2025-05-23 06:10:50+00:00): Thanks for your response. An open data license does not automatically mean that the data can be imported into OSM. For example, what about the attribution requirement for Seoul Open Data Plaza?

If my research is correct, the following page is relevant for you: https://data.seoul.go.kr/etc/accessTerms.do

I'm not a licensing expert, but I believe the data from the Seoul portal should not have been used in this way, as it may constitute a copyright violation?
캔디레인 (2025-05-23 06:34:05+00:00): The license for data on the Seoul Open Data Plaza is "Korea Open Government License Type 1," which allows the most open form of use, permitting free utilization with attribution.
adreamy (2025-06-13 17:15:38+00:00): @CandyRain mentioned the license condition "with attribution." However, unless there is a blanket permission granted for importing data into OSM, there is no feasible way to provide proper attribution. Therefore, this would be considered a copyright violation.
If you feel that a more detailed discussion is necessary, would you be willing to join the Korea OSM Telegram group or the official forum to talk it over?
NeisReview (2025-05-22 06:35:08+00:00): #DataImport

Hi, welcome to OSM!

With this changeset, you've added a significant number of features that appear to share similarities in their tags. Could you please let us know more about the source of your mapping activity? Is this a data import?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks!
ine63 (2025-05-23 00:08:23+00:00): Hi! thank u for your message. 
The data in this changeset was mapped based on publicly available information provided by the Seoul Open Data Plaza.(https://data.seoul.go.kr/)
Please feel free to reach out again if you have any further questions. Thank you.
NeisReview (2025-05-23 05:34:34+00:00): Thanks for your response. I think it would be helpful if the data source were mentioned in the changeset. Is the data's license compatible with OSM?
os-emmer (2025-05-30 16:42:28+00:00): Hallo ralrei,
du hast hier eine Schule bearbeitet:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174505497
DAs anhängen von _1 an tags ist unüblich. Handelt es sich hier um nur eine Schule oder sind auf dem Gelände eine Real- und eine Gesamtschule untergebracht?
ralrei (2025-05-30 18:57:03+00:00): Die Einträge waren am building gesetzt und ich habe sie übernommen und auf die Fläche übertragen. Vermutlich ist es der alte Name der Schule. Ich wollte einfach keine Informationen vernichten. Möglicherweise wäre old_name richtiger.
os-emmer (2025-05-30 19:05:43+00:00): Danke für deine schnelle Rückmeldung. Ich habe grade gesehen, dass die Internetseite der Realschule auch nicht mehr funktioniert. Ich habe das jetzt mal angepasst:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166986746
Wenn etwas nicht mehr existiert ist es ok, das aus OSM zu löschen.
jmarchon (2025-05-22 05:45:25+00:00): Hello! Shouldn't the street address match the street name in OSM (Halsey-Sweet Home Highway in this case)?
TheNightRider (2025-05-22 06:03:19+00:00): Hi! Yes, and after looking up the name of the highway on the State of Oregon maps, saw it had lots of alternates, so changed it to the current name, which also matches what the USPS uses.
TheNightRider (2025-05-22 06:05:55+00:00): Current name is just "Highway 228", which is what the USPS (US Postal Service) uses. Check their URL (Zip Code finder - I list their URL in the changeset) and they come up with the "Standard Address" which uses "Highway 228". We can save all the alternate names, which I did.
TheNightRider (2025-05-22 06:28:16+00:00): There are several sections that need to be changed.  In the past it was also tagged with different tags in different sections. Kind of a mess right now. Shouldn't the OR highway number take priority over local or historic names? This road probably wasn't an OR state road in the beginning. What do you think?
TheNightRider (2025-05-22 06:38:45+00:00): I guess the question is how do we deal with this road being called by several different names? Someone is maybe still calling it "Halsey-Sweet Home Highway" but the US Postal Service doesn't use that and neither does the State of Oregon on their map. So, what do we do?
TheNightRider (2025-05-22 06:41:13+00:00): Gotta crash. Talk later!
diamondarmorsteve (2025-05-22 20:42:17+00:00): It really depends on if the street signs still say "Halsey-Sweet Home Highway"
TheNightRider (2025-05-22 21:47:17+00:00): One of our guys was just there less than 2 hours ago, confirming the station was live. He's in Wren, OR, so at least in the same state. I'm going to ask him because he might have photos.
TheNightRider (2025-05-22 22:27:40+00:00): OK, I messaged my guy in Wren OR, asking if any of his photos have street signs. This is getting really interesting!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-23 00:06:54+00:00): It's more the point of what do the locals call it? If they call it "Halsey" than that should be it's <name>, with the other options as alt / official.