piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
HellMap (2024-05-15 09:53:42+00:00): @rich: True building passages where the way goes *through* (like many Soviet apartment blocks have around her) are indeed generally connected and this doesn't stop routing. This here isn't a building passage but a sky bridge. It's more similar to a bridge area - you wouldn't connect it there or you will end up connecting different layers - like a lower path to a bridge railing - this would break routing. So if one were to map something more than just a building wall/part, then such a connection would be problematic. It usually isn't and which is why I said it's "technically" incorrect, but practically fine for most cases. I left them connected here myself when adjusting the building part.
literan (2024-05-14 20:17:22+00:00): bicyle=no это юридический запрет (например, законом или дорожным знаком).
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-13 10:44:23+00:00): Hi mate, I see what you were doing here, but the whole area probably doesn't need to be a beach. I created a new beach area down by the water for more accuracy.
Lezurex (2024-05-13 18:27:52+00:00): Hi rokas_osm,

Did you mean to remove the layer key instead of the level key? I suppose you mixed it up :D

Happy Mapping
Lezurex
rokas_osm (2024-05-15 05:48:01+00:00): Thx, you are right, I will fix this.
mavl (2024-11-13 07:56:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159079151 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
AndersAndersson (2024-05-13 15:25:05+00:00): Hej!
Finns det verkligen en kyrka på gräsmattan mellan två lägenhetshus?
tastrax (2024-05-13 08:01:57+00:00): Hi folks - just to let you know that the unit numbers should be placed in the unit field (in ID editor). This keeps the unit number (addr:unit) separate from the actual house number (addr:housenumber). I have just update your recent addition. Cheers

PS - there is a process underway to correct this across Australia. About 10,000 to go in VIC!
RicoElectrico (2024-10-18 16:52:19+00:00): Cześć, wg tej uwagi ulica otwarta: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4481419
Tomek | Yanosik (2024-10-21 07:55:29+00:00): Hej, dzięki za info. Wprowadziłem zmiany :)
Hufkratzer (2024-05-14 00:11:38+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1282375878, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1282375879 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1282375881 are no riding centres. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/962996369 is an example for a riding centre. Please have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding
Beda51 (2024-05-14 10:03:27+00:00): and you know how? I live here and the horses are there
Hufkratzer (2024-05-14 10:50:01+00:00): On Bing it looks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1282375878 is a riding arena, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1263039130. The other areas could be paddocks or something similar.
Beda51 (2024-05-14 10:59:36+00:00):  leisure = horse_riding
Description
A facility where people practise horse riding, usually in their spare time, e.g. a riding centre. For a riding arena use leisure. 

I don't see anything written about the size
Hufkratzer (2024-05-14 16:40:23+00:00): From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding:

For a  riding arena use leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian
...
The tag leisure=horse_riding is used to tag an equestrian facility, often called equestrian centre, riding centre or riding stables, where people practise horse riding, typically in their spare time. The tag is for the whole area which may contain one or more riding arenas, stables, riding halls, other related buildings or paddocks (compare also Riding).
...
Use this tag only once for the whole facility, don't use it multiple times on different objects belonging to it (one feature, one OSM element rule
Beda51 (2024-05-14 17:53:39+00:00): sorry, my mistake, but at least now I know how it works, I'll fix it as soon as possible thx
Hufkratzer (2024-05-14 18:12:02+00:00): Great! Unfortunately, OSM is more complicated than you might think at first.
bxl-forever (2024-05-13 09:48:36+00:00): Hello,

No traffic signal has been reported in this area.  Moreover, it looks like a small residential street, it would be highly unlikely that pedestrian crossings would have been equipped with lights.
Are you sure?
Cosmin Popescu (2024-05-13 10:15:26+00:00): Sorry. There's this new app that I installed. I actually wanted to do another edit but is sent both. I will remove it. Thank you for pointing out.
Luzandro (2024-06-11 19:26:54+00:00): restored access values, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:forestry +  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106546431
Luzandro (2024-06-11 19:26:08+00:00): restored access values, see traffic_sign +  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106546431
Henry572 (2024-05-13 15:06:25+00:00): Hallo HK206,
Erstmal willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und danke für deine Bearbeitung! Dabei sieht alles gut aus.
Ich werde an dem Knoten, der vorher das Café war (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/219552093), markieren, dass es jetzt ein leerstehendes Geschäft ist (wenn es wirklich leersteht). Dann bleibt die Beschreibung der Barrierefreiheit erhalten und man kann in Zukunft ein neues Geschäft an die gleiche Stelle setzen.
Viele Grüße,
Hendrik
K2-SO (2024-05-13 15:48:52+00:00): Moin zusammen,

ich hatte hierzu vor einigen Monaten den Hinweis erstellt. 
Das Problem hieran war/ist, dass es das Cafe bestätigt nicht mehr gibt, es aber keinerlei Informationen über den genauen Standort im Marktkarree gab. 
Es könnte also gut sein, dass in dem Räumlichkeiten in denen das Cafe war ein anderes Geschäft ist, welches aber gesondert gemappt wurde.?
Henry572 (2024-05-13 20:30:52+00:00): Das stimmt, also sollten wir es als geschlossen eintragen und dann kann man vor Ort schauen, was für Geschäfte es aktuell gibt und diese ergänzen. Ich habe den Hinweis (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3830566) auch deshalb offen gelassen. Leider habe ich selbst keine Ortskenntnis.
Aim311_ (2025-01-31 16:44:38+00:00): Jeśli to są faktycznie ścieżki mtb to brakuje route=mtb + mtb:scale=, distance=, marked_trail= podobno innych nie mapujemy, source= . To nie jest zwykła droga rowerowa, więc także restrykcję dla pieszych.
eggie (2024-05-13 11:01:55+00:00): Dag Haynee

Het is duidelijk, maar heb  m'n twijfels of een router met deze opsomming kan omgaan.
Hier de wiki over consitional
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions
Anders een vraagje voor het forum.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43

MVG
eggie
VLD549 (2024-05-23 16:05:36+00:00): Hi, could you explain why the name should have (PKN) at the end? On both sources provided I can't find it, and in general I don't find it.
Thank you in advance!
eggie (2024-05-23 16:12:19+00:00): Hi VLD

I noticed your question... See:

denomination=pkn 	 Protestant Church in the Netherlands, Dutch merger of reformed and lutheran churches - See also denomination=protestant
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:denomination
Grimbaert (2024-05-23 17:18:37+00:00): The church's website says the following:
De Oudshoornse Kerk maakt deel uit van de Protestantse Kerk in Nederland en is een gemeente met een vrijzinnig karakter. See: https://oudshoornsekerk.nl/kerk
VLD549 (2024-06-25 12:42:52+00:00): Ok, thank you.
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-13 09:37:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 151258172 where the changeset comment is: revert addition of fake beaches
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-13 09:37:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 151258172 where the changeset comment is: revert addition of fake beaches
Dimitar155 (2024-05-16 21:27:24+00:00): Thank you! Can you recheck it with the new imagery that came out yesterday? I've moved the paths so that they match with the new imagery.
mbe57 (2025-09-20 20:22:27+00:00): This object carries the name of the district, right? And it is the second admin centre of the district location,which in fact is Phuntsholing only, right?
NeisBot (2024-05-13 09:20:04+00:00): Hi Laura_06, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1282397632

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-13 09:37:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 151258172 where the changeset comment is: revert addition of fake beaches
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 05:32:13+00:00): The user deleted her/his own created beach.
bxl-forever (2024-07-25 08:59:00+00:00): Hello,

The reversing track is not visible on Norway Orthophoto.  Can you please explain what source of information you used to determine it should be moved?  I am not saying it is wrong, I am merely stating that work on OSM must always be properly sourced.
Bart3049 (2024-07-31 06:01:27+00:00): Source: 
https://www.gleisplanweb.eu/Maps/Bergen.pdf
SekeRob (2024-07-13 10:46:47+00:00): Ciao

Si veda la nota https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4331009 . Secondo la nota e la discussione sul forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/autostrada-pedemontana-lombarda-mappate-tratte-che-non-esistono/116000 questi "in costruzione" in gran parte non hanno raggiunto lo stato di costruzione, cioè al massimo sono "proposti". Che ne dite? (Meglio se rispondete direttamente nella discussione del forum).

SekeRob
NeisBot (2024-05-13 09:25:10+00:00): Hi Laura_06, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/4288313

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
NeisBot (2024-05-13 09:30:04+00:00): Hi Laura_06, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1282399348

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
Firefishy (2024-05-13 09:32:02+00:00): Please do not vandalise OpenStreetMap. There is no beach here.
Firefishy (2024-05-13 09:31:10+00:00): Please do not vandalise OpenStreetMap. There is no beach here.
Firefishy (2024-05-13 09:31:21+00:00): Please do not vandalise OpenStreetMap. There is no beach here.
Firefishy (2024-05-13 09:33:53+00:00): This is pure vandalism. Stop.
Supaplex030 (2024-05-13 21:17:40+00:00): Hallo momabebra, du hast hier einige "public_transport=platform"-Linien gelöscht, obwohl es vielerorts/in Berlin üblich ist, die Wartebereiche der Bushaltestellen auch als Linien zu erfassen.

Außerdem hast du einmal mehr Einfahrten gelöscht, die ich wiederherstellen musste.

lg, Alex
Jofban (2025-01-13 12:25:42+00:00): Hi, worauf bezieht sich access:motor_vehicle:conditional? Ich konnte keine Beschränkung in die Richtung finden. Zum Inhalt (week 1-53/2 Fr 06:00-15:00) gibt es keine Dokumentation, die Bedeutung ist mir unklar.
Eine klärende Notiz wäre hilfreich.
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-13 09:37:55+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 151256929, 151256984, 151257178, 151257285, 151257418, 151257484, 151257572, 151257696, 151257767, 151257890, 151258090.
Supaplex (2024-05-14 01:31:03+00:00): name=潭香時尚旅店
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151258293
Supaplex (2024-05-13 19:56:06+00:00): The name:zh is 日月住館
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-20 21:45:21+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186084881
Sylvain Franiatte (2024-06-24 17:32:52+00:00): Cette eau n’est pas potable
literan (2024-05-13 20:06:34+00:00): вы отрисовали здание поверх забора. Это головотяпство
eggie (2024-05-13 10:52:10+00:00): Dag Steffen.
Even kort door de bocht. Staat er een bord G7 (rond blauw met de wandelaar) of duidelijk alleen bedoeld voor voetgangers  dan highway=footway

Geen bord.. dan highway=path gebruiken. Dat routeert ook voor fietsers.
Denk niet echt de bedoeling hier.
Is het noordelijke niet een inrit naar garages? Dus highway=service?

MVG
eggie
steffenN (2024-05-27 08:56:26+00:00): Dag eddy,
dit is een smal pad tussen de huizen, verbind de twee straten ten noorden en zuiden. Staan geen borden, maar is ook geen in-/uitrit voor garages. 
Ik heb het even met soortgelijke wegen in het dorp vergeleken, hier staat overal highway=footpath & foot=true. Heb dit hier nu ook toegepast. Akkord?
eggie (2024-05-27 09:05:13+00:00): Dag Steffen

highway=foot zou goed kunnen als het echt voor voetgangers is bedoeld. Het zal dan niet routeren voor fietsers.
foot=true  ken ik niet als een valide tag.
Ben benieuwd waar dat true vandaan komt. 
foot=yes hoeft ook niet, want dat is default op een footway.
MVG
eggie
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-20 21:45:33+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186084881
silversurfer83 (2024-05-13 13:39:55+00:00): Hello Leograph,

welcome to OSM and thank you for contributing to the database.

There are some issues with your recent edits I'd like to disuss:

- just a little nuisance: the area you work in. Please save and upload your changes in one city before moving on to the next continent. Here's an explanation in the wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

- your comments are always the same "building". This isn't helpful. Why did you delete the building in Delbrück? Please give better comments and give a source for your information. This helps others understand your work.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

- please square your buildings when they seem to be square in reality. Simply use the key "Q" on your keyboard.

- in case of questions please refer to the wiki or contact the community. We can be found in many places online and are usually quick to help :)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels

happy mapping

silversurfer83
eggie (2024-05-13 10:45:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-20 21:45:55+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186084881
StC (2024-05-16 20:56:18+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a cassé trois itinéraires pédestres, en supprimant les tags du carrefour entre ces trois itinéraires. Je vais tenter la réparation.
bxl-forever (2024-05-13 10:46:34+00:00): Bonjour,

Les précédentes semaines nous avons examiné le quartier et mis à jour les dessins des places.  Quelques questions sur votre changement de ce lundi.

1) Connaissez-vous la date de mise en service des panneaux sens unique pour rue de la Fécondité ?  On a fait des photos le 2 mai 2024 et pas encore présents, voir ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150785401

2) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1260085988 est alors à sens unique et il est strictement interdit aux cyclistes de la prendre à contresens.  Donc, pas de signal M2.  Vous confirmez ?

Merci.
bxl-forever (2024-05-13 10:48:53+00:00): correction pour question 1) c’est « date d'enlèvement » des panneaux, car le 2 mai ils étaient encore là. ;-)
P'titeSandrine (2024-05-13 13:55:52+00:00): Bonjour,
Pour la question 1), effectivement les panneaux n'ont pas encore été enlevés. Une intervention de nos services techniques est demandées pour cacher les panneaux dans les prochains jours.

Pour la question 2), il n'y a actuellement que des Sens Unique Limité prévus dans le quartier.
dypa (2024-05-13 11:58:12+00:00): задравствуйте, вы обозначили часть плотины https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1282420709 как https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:barrier%3Dretaining_wall

так и задумывалось или это опечатка?
dypa (2024-05-14 08:44:51+00:00): спасибо за внесение исправлений
frasty (2024-05-13 19:48:47+00:00): Ciao,
Ho visto che è stato aggiunto il perimetro del centro commerciale Maremà (id 1282422651).
In realtà è già presente (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13302690) e con tag dettagliati compreso il nome. L'ho quindi eliminato.
Questo centro commerciale è mappato come relazione multipoligono usando anche i tag per l'indoor mapping (https://openlevelup.net/?l=0&s=styles/basic#19/42.78839/11.11398)
miluethi (2024-05-13 12:52:49+00:00): Hi Leograph,

Can you please reduce the size of your changesets.

Thank you.
RicoElectrico (2025-12-05 10:16:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5014085
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-13 11:00:26+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11899322622

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-05-13 16:41:21+00:00): Woooterrr  Dit is oke zo.
Groet
eggie
Woooterrr (2024-05-14 12:43:29+00:00): Thanks.
Hufkratzer (2024-05-13 14:53:50+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128243130 looks like a riding arena and not like a riding centre on Bing etc. Compare https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1004939152 and OSM wiki.
Hufkratzer (2024-05-13 14:56:41+00:00): Sorry, this was the wrong link. I meant https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1282431308
RNNCS (2024-11-26 11:32:32+00:00): Ce périmètre de protection n'apparait pas clairement sur la carto (trait vert épais comme les réserves naturelles auquel il est rataché). Comment y remédier ? et comment faire apparaitre son nom ?
eggie (2024-05-13 12:48:07+00:00): Hoi  Hier is het probleem dat de inner van Ruys Dune de outer van het bos deelt. Dat mag niet. 
Nog wonderlijk dat het nog goed rendert op de standaard kaart
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151261921
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-13 12:52:06+00:00): fixed mp
eggie (2024-05-13 12:55:45+00:00): Die inner is er nu niet meer het is een onderdeel van de outer van het bos. Die is nog nodig om het 'erf' van nr 8 te laten renderen. 
Groet
eggie
Woooterrr (2024-05-14 12:44:40+00:00): ah, bedankt hiervoor!
NeisBot (2024-05-13 11:25:05+00:00): Hi Virror, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/98012701

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-13 16:27:41+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151275281
Torin G (2024-05-13 11:21:46+00:00): how do i make driveway upload
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-24 21:53:49+00:00): why?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151262222
eggie (2024-05-13 12:53:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Eric S (2025-04-23 08:33:42+00:00): Je ne comprends pas ce nouveau tunnel. Si j'ai bien compris les travaux, ils cassent l'ancienne galerie paravalanche et ils en reconstruisent une au même endroit mais complètement fermée cette fois.
https://www.mon-sejour-en-montagne.com/actualites/lautaret-27-millions-d-euros-de-travaux-pour-la-marionnaise/
eggie (2024-05-13 12:56:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SimonPoole (2024-05-13 12:53:45+00:00): Hi, I reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151265247 as it dragged ~1'000 nodes of railway lines all over the place. 

Could you give a short explanation of what you were trying to do?

Thanks.
Kersti Nebelsiek (2024-05-13 15:56:12+00:00): Nothing.
I simply don't know that I did this. Therefore thanks for reverting it.
SimonPoole (2024-05-13 17:22:35+00:00): No Problem. 

I was more asking because I'm assuming you actually wanted to change something and the revert wiped everything out including any good changes.
miluethi (2024-05-13 13:01:49+00:00): Hi John,

Thank for you great work with OSM Nicaragua. 

I have two asks:
1) can you please avoid connecting buildings with the landuse=residential?
2) some building shapes are bigger than the satellite imagery. Can you please narrow them down if necessary?

Thanks a lot!
kapazao (2024-05-13 12:49:31+00:00): Please, use PNOA imagery and be more precise.
I have asked you this some times ago and I do not see you have changed the way you edit. The geometry in your ways is horrible and it makes a lot of problems in the area. I do not see a single way aligned with reality. You modified a lot of ways that were bad aligned but you aligned them bad too, I do not understand that. Also you do not use fords or take in mind intersections of ways and rivers.
Please be careful and take in mind these things or I will need to report you.
Regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151262971
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-02 00:16:35+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153433416
Eino81 (2024-08-20 14:09:08+00:00): Hi Hlav, if you add such tracks to the map, always be sure, that it has free access or is that private... I used to see many tracks behind fences and gates, private houses or gardens. (I already updated this...)
Hlav (2024-08-20 14:29:11+00:00): Hi, as you wrote - the point is to be sure. If I am not sure, I don`t add the tag, as you understand.
Eino81 (2024-08-20 17:19:07+00:00): Hi, true, sorry. I was there one hour ago and indeed. But I never thought to open that door and go in that "corridor"...