piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2023-04-20 08:09:51+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Building not accurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.
Building nodes connected to other feature.
Clustered buildings.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135135662
Frans S (2023-04-20 08:07:15+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
Just 1 point. You mapped a white house partly along tree lines rather than extrapolate the rooflines.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135135751
Frans S (2023-04-20 08:04:21+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Building not mapped accurate
Building not squared.
Don't upload every single mapping. Collect them and upload when you are finished.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135135892
Frans S (2023-04-20 08:20:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings not accurate mapped
Buildings not squared
Clustered buildings.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135135928
Frans S (2023-04-20 08:19:28+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings not accurate mapped and squared.
See my comment on other changesets.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135136063
os-emmer (2023-12-21 18:56:02+00:00): Hallo redrace,
du hast hier mitten in Deutschland einige Adressen (Hausnummer 14-22) mit addr:country=FR versehen. War das absicht?
os-emmer (2023-12-21 18:57:37+00:00): Ich habe da grade noch ein paar andere Adressen gefunden, die das auch betrifft:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1F7W
redrace (2023-12-21 19:16:56+00:00): Nee ich kümmere mich. Paste and Copy Fehler.
redrace (2023-12-21 19:24:55+00:00): Erledigt! Danke für den Hinweis! 
Schöne Weihnachten und komm gut ins Neue Jahr.
Meik
os-emmer (2023-12-21 19:31:29+00:00): Danke für die sehr schnelle Rückmeldung. Da ist auch noch dieser hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111741406
Ich war mal so frei anzunehemen, dass das auch ein Flüchtigkeitsfehler war und habe das schon korrigiert.
redrace (2023-12-21 19:49:04+00:00): Besten Dank!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-20 08:10:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10826410251
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10826410282
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10826410283

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2023-04-20 10:56:59+00:00): Hello again. 
Here, you did not square the rectangular buildings with the Q key, when selected.
1 building has a round extension. Please try to map these features more accurate. Zoom in rather far and put more nodes alongside the roofline.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135136516
djsa (2025-10-29 11:08:55+00:00): Hi, this is seemingly still promoted at: https://www.groteroutepaden.be/nl/wandelroutes/melding-over-gr-pad/rando-velo-u-luniversitaire

Was it considered disused since randovelo.org wasn't properly maintained?
Thierry1030 (2025-10-29 17:48:43+00:00): Mapped as disused in 2023 at the request of  the "coordinateur du RAVeL et des itinéraires cyclables internationaux et régionaux de longue distance en Wallonie" working at Service public de Wallonie, mobilité infrastructures. 

Hereunder you'll find his message:
"En effet, si les itinéraires Rando Vélo ont été les premiers itinéraires de randonnées à vélo cartographiés et balisés par l'ASBL Rando Vélo au début des années '90 sur le territoire de la Wallonie, la situation a bien changé depuis. En effet, le RAVeL est apparu à partir du milieu des années '90 et les itinéraires Rando vélo n'ont pas évolué pour en tenir compte. Par ailleurs, l'ASBL Rando Vélo qui était composée d'une poignée de bénévoles a vu son activité se réduire au fil des années, notamment à la suite du décès de son père fondateur, Monsieur Guy Hochart, le 1er novembre 2011.

En 2014, le Service Public de Wallonie Mobilité et Infrastructure a par ailleurs mis en place et défini le tracé des itinéraires officiels cyclables internationaux et régionaux de longue distance en Wallonie . Une grande partie de ces itinéraires ont été signalés et balisés, ce qui représentent aujourd'hui plus de 1.900 km d'itinéraires cyclables signalés/balisés en Wallonie. D'un point de vue touristique, ils sont soutenus et reconnus par le Commissariat Général au Tourisme et VisitWallonia et ils constituent l'ossature de base des réseaux points-nœuds mis en œuvre par les 5 Provinces wallonnes.

Pour ce qui est de Rando Vélo, dont les itinéraires n'étaient plus soutenus par le Commissariat Général au Tourisme et VisitWallonia depuis une dizaine d'années, il semble que l'ASBL n'ait plus d'activité aujourd'hui. Bien qu'existant toujours dans la Banque Carrefour des Entreprises, son site Internet n'est plus actif. Notons aussi que cela fait plusieurs années que l'ASBL ne renouvelait ni ses itinéraires (qui empruntaient d'ailleurs même parfois des chemins et voies interdites aux cyclistes), ni leur balisage. Or, avec l'avènement du RAVeL et des itinéraires officiels internationaux et régionaux de longue distance, une évolution des itinéraires Rando Vélo et de l'objectif des quelques membres de l'ASBL aurait été plus que souhaitable.

Face à ce constat, il apparaît donc aujourd'hui par cohérence vis-à-vis des itinéraires mis en place par les organismes officiels en Wallonie et par crédibilité pour les données Opencyclemap, qu'il y a lieu de supprimer toutes les références aux itinéraires Rando Vélo dans la carte Opencyclemap"
djsa (2025-10-30 08:18:43+00:00): Perfect, thanks for the background info! It threw an error in osmose, which is why I was looking for some context. Much appreciated!
gscholz (2023-04-21 06:56:33+00:00): Hi Miku Kanda,
this changvese has created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate buildings.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Frans S (2023-04-20 10:54:40+00:00): Hello. I reviewed this changeset as well.
Buildings are not squared.
In 1 case, you clustered 2 buildings.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135136789
wkdgs (2023-04-20 10:43:11+00:00): Ein kleiner Tipp: Im ID-Editor gibt es eine Funktion die Objekte rechtwinklig macht (Rechtsklick auf das Gebäude oder 'Q' drücken). Gerade bei Gebäuden sieht es dann etwas schöner aus, wenn es rechtwinklig angezeigt wird.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135136982
Waaslander (2023-04-20 08:23:18+00:00): Kleine Kouterstraat*
SomeoneElse (2024-04-28 17:43:34+00:00): Hello,
How much of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15746157/history is actually trees? Very few seem to have been planted.
Best Regards,
Andy
Silviculture (2024-04-29 07:23:47+00:00): There should be around 50,000 seedlings on the ground, with an estimate 200,000+ at completion.
SomeoneElse2 (2024-05-01 21:22:39+00:00): I got a chance to map out some of the new trackways tonight.  Some of the accesses (e.g. where the new car park will be, and from Moor Lane to the west) aren't open yet but some are (from Moor Lane to the north), so you can get most places internally.  I'll try and upload and map those traces over the next couple of weeks or so.  Next, weather permitting, I'll try and add the missing hedges, the internal fence details and where the trees exist already - some broadleaved ones are already poking out of their tubes at the eastern side.
Not looked at west of Moor Lane or south of Wetherby Road yet.
skquinn (2023-04-20 12:45:32+00:00): The position is close but obviously it's not that close to the road, it's in the building just to the west.
PPete2 (2025-11-20 13:35:25+00:00): Hallo, du hast in diesem CS den "St. Rupert Pilgerweg" hinzugefügt. Da es nun einen Weg im Gebiet der Gemeinde "Nußdorf am Haunsberg" nicht mehr gibt https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4329029 , habe ich bei der dortigen Gemeinde nach einem aktualisierten Verlaufs des Pilgerwegs angefragt. Interessanterweise wissen die gar nichts von diesem Pilgerweg auf ihrem Gemeindegebiet. Daher meine Frage: Was ist deine Quelle für diesen Pilgerweg? Ist er vorort überhaupt (überall) ausgeschildert? Denn falls nicht, gehören diese Abschnitte auch nicht als Teil einer Wanderroute in die OSM.
PPete2 (2025-11-25 10:31:55+00:00): Den "St. Rupert Pilgerweg" wieder gelöscht, da der Zweig Oberndorf-Bischofshofen nicht beschildert und somit auch nicht nachprüfbar ist. Owner ist weiters nicht mehr aktiv und antwortete nicht auf Nachfragen.
eggie (2023-04-20 10:16:22+00:00): Ik heb de fietspad tagging G11 teruggezet. Het is gewoon een fietspad.
Voorgaande mapper ingeseind.
MVG
eggie
jeslop (2023-04-20 15:01:12+00:00): Hola ticuxic. ¿Puedes dar más información sobre este nodo? Por lo que se ve en el satélite no parece corresponder con lo que señala la wiki para esa etiqueta: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:historic%3Dmanor, parece una casa de campo normal.. Lo mismo respercto al nombre, no está permitido añadir información personal: ¿tienes alguna fuente para este nombre?

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
mueschel (2023-04-20 10:16:47+00:00): Please check the tags you're using. There is no "iscde:level", the correct tag is "isced:level".
Kovoschiz (2023-04-20 14:08:05+00:00): Please check that the merge on HZMB already has `lanes=4`. Don't over-extend the `=motorway_link`. It is ugly and unrealistic. Follow the physical separation rule for best results.
Kovoschiz (2023-04-20 14:08:34+00:00): * `=service` 
As well as `placement=`
user_5359 (2023-04-21 16:38:41+00:00): Hello! Please notice your mistakes: 
iscde:level instead of isced:level
name:eng instead of name:en
eggie (2023-04-20 10:20:23+00:00): Dag Maarten,
Fietspadtagging G11 teruggezet en bicycle=yes verwijderd.
Voorgaande mapper dacht dat het als wandelpad getagd was.
MVG
eggie
maartenbaijs (2023-04-24 07:15:34+00:00): Bedankt Eggie! :)
Jordi MF (2023-04-20 13:44:56+00:00): Hola Maminat,
¿Qué pretendías mapear añadiendo los nombres "veo" y "Adri"?
Saludos,
Jordi
Frans S (2023-04-20 12:27:49+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. However, you did not square all buildings.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135139017
Frans S (2023-04-22 10:23:39+00:00): Hello. 
Now, during validating your work. I noticed that you map buildings sometimes in  a weird way, combining 2 lines and tag it as a multi polygon, Just connect all nodes of a building in 1 go.
Best regards
Tomas Straupis (2023-04-20 11:19:19+00:00): Hello, be careful, maxar image has a considerable misalignment, maxar imagery has to be aligned to a much better aligned ORG10LT before adjusting/adding objects. I've restored correct positions of roads. Good luck.
Bolt052 (2023-04-21 04:54:47+00:00): Hello Tomas, 

Thanks for your time in making the required corrections and valuable feedback. I shall take this feedback on high precedence and make sure such errors are not repeated here after.

Thanks again & Happy Mapping.
jeslop (2023-04-20 15:06:00+00:00): Hola. La forma correcta para poner el ancho es esta: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:width

Cambialo si te es posible.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
ticuxic (2023-04-20 18:57:20+00:00): como es la primera vez que subo caminos tendrás que perdonarme errores , conozco la zona y todos esos caminos muy bien , si tengo errores te importaría solucionarlo no sé cómo hacerlo
jeslop (2023-04-22 10:57:41+00:00): Sin problema, iré arreglando el etiquetado, tenlo en cuenta para futuras ediciones. Gracias por colaborar.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Frans S (2023-04-20 11:00:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings not always mapped accurate.
Building snot squared.
Don't map a yard with multiple buildings as 1 building.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135139508
4004 (2023-04-23 21:19:05+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
можно было разрезать линию, и на участок западнее повесить теги проезда (highway=service)
Frans S (2023-04-20 10:58:20+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. However, not all buildings are squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135139538
Frans S (2023-04-20 10:52:47+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
A building should show a shadow. No shadow, probably not a building.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135139873
ivanbranco (2023-07-06 08:26:24+00:00): Hi, now that you merged the two beaches into one isn't clear anymore which one is nudism=no and which one is nudism=permissive
ToprakM (2023-07-06 19:23:11+00:00): You are right, my bad. Sorry
rskedgell (2023-04-20 13:13:42+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Thanks for spotting that and updating the map. You asked for a review of your edit and it looks fine to me.
BCNorwich (2023-04-20 13:51:38+00:00): Hi, There was just one problem there, you added a joining node, Node: 10826702329. The node joined Way: Docklands Light Railway (163558975), (layer=-1), to Way: Cyprus Roundabout (1164109215), layer=1.  Features of different layers should not be joined where like this they cross over each other.  Otherwise all OK.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2023-04-20 13:52:17+00:00): Forgot to say I've unjoined the ways.
Dodko (2023-05-15 08:52:33+00:00): Slovo ulica sa do názvu ulice nezapisuje.
https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/NEJlJhUbhWA/m/QZgF71ZpBwAJ
martianfreeloader (2023-04-22 21:17:08+00:00): Hey,

please try to create smaller changesets when possible. This will make it much easier for others to understand what you're doing.

Thanks and happy mapping!
mueschel (2023-04-20 10:17:03+00:00): Please check the tags you're using. There is no "iscde:level", the correct tag is "isced:level".
ADAC Touristische InfoSysteme (2023-04-25 11:34:20+00:00): Hi trungbin2009,
why did you delete the node (label) for Hanoi City?
SekeRob (2023-04-27 17:57:56+00:00): Could it be trungbin2009 the node data was integrated into the area. I see lots off tags on there
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1903516/history
mcliquid (2023-04-20 16:57:48+00:00): Siehe auch den Kommentar hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135141404#map=17/47.52597/12.36446
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135141339
Arnas Trečiokas (2023-04-20 10:40:39+00:00): Kuo vadovaujantis yra nusprendžiama ar kelią žymėti žemėlapyje ar ne? Privatus kelias galėtų būti bent tuomet, kai juo privačiai ir naudojamasi. Kitu atveju yra tuomet labai dar daug nepažymėtų pravažiavimų per pievas, laukus ar miškus.
Tomas Straupis (2023-04-20 11:36:08+00:00): Jei kelias yra realybėje, tai jis įvedamas į GIS duomenų bazę. Privatus neprivatus, grįstas negrįstas, pavadinimas ir pan. yra tiesiog kelio atributai. Pagal atributus kiekvienas atskiras žemėlapis nusprendžia, ką daryti: rodyti, nerodyti, maršrutizuoti, nemaršrutizuoti ir pan.
Arnas Trečiokas (2023-04-20 11:41:10+00:00): O kas Lietuvoje įveda duomenis į GIS? Jie turėtų pagal faktą galėti ir išimti tuomet?
Tomas Straupis (2023-04-20 11:44:23+00:00): GIS yra sąvoka, o ne konkreti duomenų bazė. Čia mes kalbame apie OpenStreetMap GIS duomenų bazę, kituose žemėlapiuose naudojami duomenys iš oficialių LT GIS duomenų rinkinio GRPK. Koks google naudoja dar kitą savo duomenų rinkinį ir pan. Visuose tuose rinkiniuose kažkas turi galimybę įvesti, kažkas ištrinti ir pan.
Arnas Trečiokas (2023-04-20 12:03:37+00:00): Tuomet grįžtame prie pirmo klausimo, kaip mums dabar nuspręsti ir patvirtinti ar ten yra kelias ar ne? Nesutarimas yra matyt kelio sąvokos supratime, ne pačiame fakte, nes vieniems gali atrodyti jei eina pravažiuoti, tai jau kelias, kitiems reikia konkretesnio apibrėžimo, pavyzdžiuje kelias turi kažkur vesti - turėti tikslą. Pvz.: pagal OpenStreeMap apibrėžimą apie tokius nežymius kelius: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=track, šis manau neatitinka nei vieno pavyzdžio, nebent paskutinį: "A dirt track used for access to the mountains, desert, or other remote area.", kas šiuo atveju būtų ežeras. Bet kiekvienais metais tas pravažiavimas keičiasi priklausomai nuo oro, grunto būsenos ar važiuojančių supratimo ir galimybių, tai pagal tai neperbraižysime kiekvieną kartą žemėlapių. Ar reikėtų?
Tomas Straupis (2023-04-20 13:57:42+00:00): Tokių kintančių kelių yra nemažai. Taip juos galima perbraižyti, turint tikslesnius duomenis, bet tai nėra esminis dalykas. Esminis dalykas - atspindėti situaciją, kad kelias ten yra.
mcliquid (2023-04-20 16:55:25+00:00): Hallo Kopftörlgrat, hast du ein Foto von der Beschilderung des Vierstadlwegs mit der Zugangsbeschränkung vor Ort?
Ich wundere mich, weil beide Wegweiser hierüber routen:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AGuidepost_Streithausenerwiese.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AGuidepost_Streithausenerbr%C3%BCcke.jpg

Über den Weg verläuft auch der offizielle Jakobsweg des TVB Wilder Kaiser: https://www.wilderkaiser.info/de/aktivitaeten/jakobsweg-tirol-am-wilden-kaiser.html

Siehe auch: https://jakobsweg-tirol.net/startseite/hauptweg-tirol-nord-inntal/

Sollte man den TVB Wilder Kaiser sowie die Jakobsweg Tirol
Pillerseetal Regionalentwicklungs GmbH von der Sperrung in Kenntnis setzen, sodass sie die Strecken umleiten können? Vielen Dank für deine Rückmeldung.
user_14099638 (2023-04-23 12:34:50+00:00): Leider sind wir heute unerwartet per E-Bike an einem verschlossenen Gatter gestrandet. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/291542409 Es gibt für Fahrradfahrer lokal tatsächlich keine Umleitung. Der Hof nennt sich übrigens tatsächlich Streithausen. Nomen est omen

Tipp, Alternativroute für Fahrradfahrer über https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396433326#map=15/47.5158/12.3641 und Oberndorf
Kopftörlgrat (2023-04-24 06:38:25+00:00): Der Abschnitt ist tatsächlich bis auf Weiteres für alle Nutzer gesperrt.
Die TVB's sowie die Jakobsweg Tirol
Pillerseetal Regionalentwicklungs GmbH sind informiert. Der TVB arbeitet an einer Umleitung - leider gibt es Probleme mit der Schilderlieferung. Die Umleitung ist online bereits aktuell.
eggie (2023-04-20 11:15:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Het lijkt erop dat dit de nieuwe huisnummers zijn.
Bestaat Veenburgerweg 1 d t/m k dan nog wel? 
Zoneit dan kunnen die huisnummernodes weg. 



https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=veenburgerhof&objectId=0203010001028507&theme=BRT%20Achtergrond&geometry.x=162628.9230444539&geometry.y=466107.944181868&zoomlevel=14.424&bijbehorendeAdressen=Pand

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-04-20 11:30:05+00:00): Historische nummers verwijderd.
Komen in BAG niet meer voor.
Mochten ze nog wel bestaan dan een terugmelding doen bij de BAG (Kadaster) svp. 

MVG
eggie
bxl-forever (2023-04-20 11:17:21+00:00): Next time, please create a POI.
Do *not* fake the whole building for a single activity.  There is a private door for residents or other activities here.
We fixed it.
Happy mapping.