piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
felipeeugenio (2024-06-17 21:16:40+00:00): Hola. No parece haber un café ahí. Puede confrmar?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152819845
Allison P (2024-06-17 21:18:43+00:00): I didn't mean to upload the nodes with PARCEL and POOLSQFT tags. Oops
felipeeugenio (2024-06-18 13:40:10+00:00): Hola. por favor escribir con capitalización normal y no sólo mayúsculas.
Gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152820725
felipeeugenio (2024-06-18 13:41:18+00:00): Además el restaurant ya estaba. Lo borró solo para agregarlo otra vez con menos información.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152820725
Jordi MF (2024-06-17 22:39:58+00:00): Hola Tioman,

¿Qué querías mapear? En este punto no hay ningún "nightclub" que se llame "Plaça del Cedro".
KiloThree (2024-06-18 01:31:36+00:00): You've removed kerb and tactile paving tags from crossings, which is used for accessibility mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152821544
KiloThree (2024-06-18 01:32:26+00:00): Additionally, you've removed the dismount tag on the Poplar St community path exit, which is signed as dismount
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152821544
cubbe8 (2024-06-18 01:34:52+00:00): Sorry, will fix
salisburymistake (2024-06-18 11:35:22+00:00): Any specific reason or just personal aesthetics?
Zol87 (2024-11-05 02:12:22+00:00): only if it's the sole occupant
MatchaHatesGoogle (2024-06-19 01:07:14+00:00): Hey there! If this is an abandoned house you should add the "abandoned:" key (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned:*) to define that information. As well, you should look for a more specific tag than "building=house" if you know it, as typically that's used for rowhouses, and in this situation may be able to be defined better. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dhouse). Otherwise, thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap! On the ground knowledge like a building being abandoned, or what store is at a location, are some of the most important things to gather on OSM. Don't hesitate to ask if you need any other information, I'm happy to help :)
MasonP11 (2024-06-19 12:24:14+00:00): Howdy.

I must've missed that tag because I did search for it. There's also another house down the road that's abandoned. (rather famous actually, the Cherokee Rose House from The Walking Dead)

I'll update it.
Mason
MatchaHatesGoogle (2024-06-20 10:42:05+00:00): Glad to hear your response, and happy mapping :)

Let me know if you need help any time!
-Matcha
MatchaHatesGoogle (2024-06-20 10:55:58+00:00): Oh, I almost forgot! Make sure when you add buildings and other polygons with 90° angles, you orthogonalize them with "Q" to get sharp corners :D
rskedgell (2024-06-19 14:28:03+00:00): 500 of these possibly re-inserted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152889949
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-17 23:37:46+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 152822570, 152822667, 152822715, 152822998, 152823043, 152823055, 152823061, 152823080, 152823086, 152823098, 152823106, 152823121, 152823127, 152823137, 152823148, 152823154, 152823159, 152823168, 152823179, 152823197, 152823203, 152823205, 152823211, 152823226, 152823235, 152823250, 152823260, 152823263, 152823272, 152823325, 152823345, 152823395, 152823407, 152823411, 152823437, 152823447.
Gsgeorge (2024-06-18 19:21:29+00:00): Welcome to Open Street Map. Thanks for your contributions. Please keep edits within each changeset localized to the same area, region, or city. For example, do not make edits in New York State if you are making edits in Lafayette, LA.
emersonveenstra (2024-06-17 23:57:57+00:00): Sorry, i meant remove the MIS relation because it was a grouping of things inside the relation, not actually a multipolygon
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-07 08:53:13+00:00): Don't use roads as boundary members. Your subsequent changes connected a bridge to the road it crossed causing navigation issues.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152823769
natthager (2024-07-07 12:49:37+00:00): Oops, thanks for that. I did this a handful of times, but I'll fix them up soon. Would the best way to approach this be 'boundary' ways along (but not sharing nodes with) the roads?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-07 21:49:04+00:00): Along roads if that's the actual boundary. Always good to include a source in your changeset as well.
natthager (2024-07-08 01:30:52+00:00): Understood! Will fix things up when I can. Thanks for the help!
HBanu (2024-06-20 09:35:28+00:00): Good. Keep mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152823855
ZLima12 (2024-06-18 18:55:01+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for contributing. Please try to break your edits up into multiple changesets when changing geographic areas. Otherwise, it can make it more difficult for people to review it.
CurlingMan13 (2024-06-18 21:09:19+00:00): Also, please use a more detailed changeset comment.  What did you change and why?  "-" tells me absolutely nothing about what you did.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-03 12:50:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11989180911/history - co masz na myśli przez app_operated=yes?

Że to można prze apkę obsługiwać czy że tylko przez apkę to można obsługiwać?

Jeśli to drugie - to może app_operated=only byłoby lepsze?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-03 12:52:11+00:00): a, widzę display_operated=yes
olo81 (2025-01-03 15:29:08+00:00): Raczej skopiowałem z innego i tylko przeedytowałem numery.
HBanu (2024-06-20 09:33:26+00:00): Good. Keep mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152824355
HBanu (2024-06-20 09:33:49+00:00): Good. Keep mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152824355
akimapbuilder (2024-06-19 06:24:37+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since there is no building in sight.
aduxas (2026-07-01 01:11:16+00:00): There is actually a private road sign at the entrance, just off Durfee Hill.  It says NO ACCESS NO TRESPASSING.
On the other hand, the road shows up on town road maps and plat maps.  This should invalidate the posted sign, unless the town recently abandoned the road.  Do you have any info?
seattlefyi (2024-06-24 04:47:52+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! Thanks for the edit!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-28 15:10:44+00:00): are you sure about location of power outlet in the middle of the park?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11989230568
BudgieInWA (2025-05-29 00:42:00+00:00): Yes! There are a few around the park, mounted on short poles, for food trucks during events and that kind of thing.

I think I figured out the correct tagging, including the socket type, for one of the others a while ago ...
muralito (2024-06-18 12:28:29+00:00): Hola. La clasificacion vial sigue una convencion establecida por la comunidad. No es lo que a cualquier colaborador se le ocurra. Ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina/Etiquetas#V%C3%ADas_de_circulaci%C3%B3n

Por no ir de acuerdo a la convencion este cambio fue revertido.

Saludos.
muralito (2024-06-18 12:29:23+00:00): Hola. La clasificacion vial sigue una convencion establecida por la comunidad. No es lo que a cualquier colaborador se le ocurra. Ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina/Etiquetas#V%C3%ADas_de_circulaci%C3%B3n

Por no ir de acuerdo a la convencion este cambio fue revertido.

Saludos.
Erelen (2024-06-18 03:08:31+00:00): About Алмашки крај reconstruction - earlier wrong revert & unreplied for now comment: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152730077
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-08-25 12:31:15+00:00): Rngrk您好，我看到您在西安周边绘制了大量的山体地形，我比较好奇您是怎么做到的，用了哪里的数据导入的，因为看起来效果确实不错
NeisBot (2024-06-18 04:30:24+00:00): Hi lukhav, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 81% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 2 highway(s)
- 20 building(s)
- 62 natural(s)
- 3 waterway(s)
- 3 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=152826465
mavl (2024-06-18 04:37:35+00:00): Hello. This is not spam. These are points of interest. You'd better contact the community before deleting.  
  
https://community.openstreetmap.org/
  
This changeset is reverted.
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-18 04:42:27+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/152828021
user_21668131 (2024-06-18 04:51:52+00:00): @mavl they are spam, most of those are added by maps me users. and they are like "abu example house", "my house", "my aunt house" or "my friend example" or "my car is here" or "our location is here" or "my grandfather grave"      
Here is some examples:       
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11945816469   
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11981166769   
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11967157369        
See this location that is filled with spam nodes that you just restored:   
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/32.02616/44.29199     

And we had discussed this many times in our local community in telegram before many times and any deletion of such spam is welcomed as they are ruining our map.   
You should've asked before revert my changeset, I did not only remove spam, I also did many validation error fixes here.
mavl (2024-06-18 05:02:21+00:00): I haven't checked every object. But not all objects were added through maps.me. For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4846735026/history   
  
If this has been discussed, it is advisable to provide a hyperlink to the discussion.
LockOnGuy (2024-06-18 05:14:34+00:00): Upon review, it is evident that the majority of these entries are spam and irrelevant data introduced by mobile navigation applications. Leveraging my local knowledge, I can confirm that these nodes are indeed spam, and their deletion was appropriate based on my observations. Additionally, the user's comments are accurate. This issue has been previously discussed within our local community (https://t.me/OSM_Iraq), and such deletions are welcomed, particularly as Iraq and the broader Middle East region are often plagued by Maps.me/mobile apps spam.  
Best regards
user_21668131 (2024-06-18 05:33:56+00:00): @mavl actually you don't need to a permission to delete spam and fake data you just delete it because it is the right thing. Just like mapping a road you can just edit the map and add it, isn't it an open map?    
 Having personal bookmarks, fakes, duplicates, and spam is not only harming this map but harming all the maps that uses this map as a source.
woodpeck (2024-06-18 07:41:14+00:00): lukhav, can you explain two things: (1) was this spam deletion your very first contribution to OSM or have you created this secondary account for that purpose alone? It is unusual for new users to delete thousands of things with JOSM. And (2) what method did you use to identify what you believe to be spam and how did the node pointed out by mavl above get selected?
user_21668131 (2024-06-18 08:11:26+00:00): no this is not my very first contribution to OSM.  
I had many edits before to the project and used it before and I'm somewhat an experienced user.  
I had deleted my OSM profile to remove my digital foot print on the internet for privacy reasons.  
  
The method I used to get the spam data are 1-overpass 2-osm search by Nominatim. 3-basic lookout around osm.  
note I did not dig deep, and maybe there is ton of spam left.  
About the one node mentioned you asked about, yes that one and couple others shall not be deleted. I also noticed there is points that I only deleted the names from while I should have had delete them fully. I also did many other error and caution fixes in this changeset.
aduxas (2024-12-17 23:09:52+00:00): I left the following comment to version #8 (AaronFitz):
---------
The sign at the entrance says NO TRESPASSING. No exceptions. It is not because it "looks walker friendly" that the sign is open for interpretation. It looks bike friendly too, and I did ride my bike there. Yet, you only changed pedestrian access. Why?
-------
PS Something that is often overlooked:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate#Clarification_of_the_term_“private”
access=private does NOT mean private property.  What would you suggest as edit to make this complete and correct?
ZeLonewolf (2024-12-17 23:15:15+00:00): Good catch, I would remove the foot=yes tag.
aduxas (2024-12-18 14:20:08+00:00): Just checked and noticed I commented on version #7.  I had not seen you commented on #8.  The wikipedia article says: "The Rhode Island Supreme Court held in 2020 in Clark v. Buttonwoods Beach Association that the streets are public"
Does that mean the roads are public after all?
aduxas (2024-12-18 14:23:11+00:00): I assume the 2023 ruling supersedes?
ZeLonewolf (2024-12-19 03:00:07+00:00): A few years back there was some drama with the neighborhood association where it was murky about the roads were private (and therefore the residents allowed to post things like the no trespassing sign).  However, the 2023 document seems to resolve that as far as I can tell (am not a lawyer).
真中あお (2026-02-03 14:12:15+00:00): Hello, OpenStreetMap is a public database, please make sure that the uploaded data is true and accurate

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178053001
Berdly (2024-06-18 03:40:27+00:00): Oops forgot to change the changeset summary-

It’s actually “fixed an old tagging error”, my bad
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-18 04:00:11+00:00): Hi Costel. Thanks for you work, but could you please use better comments on your changes: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments. "Update" really doesn't mean anything! Even just "Added buildings" would be better :-) Thanks!
tyfi (2024-06-18 04:15:05+00:00): I just went ahead and modeled the buildings and driveway in the area so that it doesn't get moved back onto U.S. 50.
Lostmonkey (2025-06-16 07:14:43+00:00): Mon stednavneregistret har en fejl eller er forældet for denne sø, der lokalt vist kun bliver kaldt for "Surfsøen"? (fx: https://tv-kalundborg.dk/nyheder/1-2-mio-kr-til-surfsoen-i-bregninge/)
b-holdet (2025-06-16 07:22:28+00:00): Jeg tror at navnet Amisøen er officielt nok, da den ligger opad Amfivej, mens det andet er lokalt.
Er der så ikke bare at give den:
loc_name=Surfersøen
NicaTopo (2024-06-23 15:22:27+00:00): Tetsuo,

Some of your building shapes are far too big. They include serveral buildings and empty yard around the buildings. Please narrow down your shapes. 

Thank you.
NicaTopo (2024-06-23 15:31:18+00:00): Tetsuo,
Your building shapes are far too big compared with the aerial imagery. Please narrow your shapes. I'm going to delete the biggest shapes.

Thanks
miluethi (2024-06-18 11:57:03+00:00): Hi Yoshihito,

Please square out all your building-shapes in OSM. Select a building shape and press the "Q" key.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
HBanu (2024-06-20 13:32:29+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152829018
HBanu (2024-06-20 13:51:46+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152829018
mavl (2024-11-13 07:56:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159079151 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
literan (2024-06-18 19:10:32+00:00): нет такого населенного пункта "Старый Свет". Не надо писать абы что
mavl (2024-11-13 07:56:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159079151 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
RedGreenBlue09 (2024-06-18 16:15:22+00:00): These ways represent part 2 of the project, but construction haven't started yet so they should be proposal.
Black_Diamond (2024-06-20 19:16:52+00:00): Actually Lodge Road should not have been disconnected. It's still connected and visible. Therefore it should be mapped. It's just a bad path with fire damage visible in recent aerial imagery. This part of the road might also have been closed in previous years. I have reconnected and updated this segment of Lodge Road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10552330) to access=no and made the smoothness=very_bad. The line that you made is not interpretable by other mapping apps, but those applications tend to respect gates and access information.
Bay area mapper (2024-06-20 20:22:02+00:00): Actually, the road  is impossible, there are *trees* growing where the road was. It is not navigable with any kind of vehicle, not even off-road trucks.

Prior to the trees, the road was unmaintained, dirt with rock slides and huge holes that can trap a car. That part was overgrown with plants that scraped both sides of the car.  
We had to back up in that environment, trying to not go over the cliff.
If the road exists, it is only in the legal sense.

It needs to be flagged as impassible, at a minimum.
Bay area mapper (2024-06-20 20:46:14+00:00): The image on Google maps is several years old, from the time of the fire. It has gotten worse. The road appears abandoned since then, there's a "road closed" sign that had fallen down.

I don't know how to attach a photo here (maybe upload to mapillary?)

The road leading up to it becomes grade 4 or 5 prior to it ending.
Black_Diamond (2024-06-20 21:44:25+00:00): You're welcome to switch the segment to smoothness (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness) to some other value. I'm not exactly sure what the value should be since I haven't seen a recent picture of the road. The access=no is the important part of the change.

Uploading a recent photo to Mapillary is a great idea, especially at both ends of the closed road. Then other mappers will get a better idea of what the road conditions are.

As far as using other data sources, you should be very careful. Google Maps is copyrighted material and should not be used in OpenStreetMap. See the following for more details. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F
Black_Diamond (2024-06-20 23:25:16+00:00): If you happen to upload photos to Mapillary, it would be ideal if the photos were of both ends of the road closure. I had to estimate the closed segment based on potentially existing buildings. Some of the buildings look burned in the aerial photography. I marked the segment to the next building as access=no, but it could be longer.

This area likely needs some extra attention.
Stalker61 (2024-06-20 13:46:31+00:00): Какого ... ломать граф и писать фейк? Никакой укладки асфальта нет в помине! И нефиг лепить ссылки от НЯК-а https://yandex.ru/maps/57/khanty-mansiysk/?l=trf%2Ctrfe&ll=69.015889%2C60.968561&mode=whatshere&whatshere%5Bpoint%5D=69.016079%2C60.968106&whatshere%5Bzoom%5D=16.18&z=17.27
Вандал диванный
Stalker61 (2024-06-20 13:47:20+00:00): Какого ... ломать граф и писать фейк? Никакой укладки асфальта нет в помине! И нефиг лепить ссылки от НЯК-а https://yandex.ru/maps/57/khanty-mansiysk/?l=trf%2Ctrfe&ll=69.015889%2C60.968561&mode=whatshere&whatshere%5Bpoint%5D=69.016079%2C60.968106&whatshere%5Bzoom%5D=16.18&z=17.27
Вандал диванный
tastrax (2024-06-18 08:26:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM. FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Antonio127 (2024-06-18 21:30:25+00:00): Дорогу между Камова и Пилотной точно открыли для движения автомобилей?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152830539
Helkern (2024-06-20 11:42:15+00:00): Полностью готова велодорожка, заканчивается укладка пешеходной дорожки, дорога (авто) готова но все пока закрыто для проезда и прохода.
Трек велодорожки отрисован по факту, часть дороги тоже, нужно еще отрисовать круговой перекресток
Antonio127 (2024-06-20 14:18:36+00:00): Тогда лучше будет навесить highway=constuction непосредственно на дорогу https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dconstruction
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152830539
literan (2024-06-18 19:08:38+00:00): не надо писать абы что в тег addr:city
literan (2024-06-18 19:07:49+00:00): не надо заполнять тег addr:city абы чем. Этот тег вообще не нужен (но если заполнять - то названием населенного пункта)
Лияя (2024-06-18 19:28:04+00:00): Я тег не заполняла. Заполняла только город, улицу и номер дома.
literan (2024-06-18 19:38:07+00:00): неправда, заполняли. Все ходы записаны:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1285055250/history
Лияя (2024-06-18 20:00:33+00:00): Мне же лучше знать, заполняла или нет) теги я не трогаю.
literan (2024-06-18 20:08:26+00:00): значит он был добавлен кем-то другим под вашим логином. Разбирайтесь с тем, кто дает вам задания. В случае продолжения таких кривых правок вас будет ждать блокировка.
mavl (2024-11-13 07:56:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159079151 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
silversurfer83 (2024-06-18 18:44:05+00:00): Und was ist an der Stelle, wo dieser Zaun (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1293352548) den Fußweg kreuzt?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152831515
fititnt (2024-06-24 00:44:54+00:00): Hello Francheska!

I think https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2532505667/history was deleted by accident.
richlv (2024-06-20 18:26:14+00:00): Sveiki, liels paldies par kartes papildināšanu.
Vai internetā ir kādi resursi par šo restorānu?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11989599110
MārisD (2024-06-20 20:28:36+00:00): Paldies par jautājumu! Nosaukums tomēr ir SIIL. Interneta resursos ir par restorānu SIIL.
richlv (2024-06-20 23:05:47+00:00): Burvīgi, liels paldies.
Pievienoju arī epastu un telefonu no https://liepaja.travel/edinasana/restorans-siil/ .
Spriežot pēc pieejamās informācijas, tas nav saīsinājums - nomainīju uz "sentence case".
Joseph DiGiovanni (2024-06-24 05:27:36+00:00): Not sure why you removed the unmarked crossings at E 180th and Ryer Ave. The NE corner only has one curb at the apex, which you've changed the position of.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152832212
MxxCon (2024-06-24 05:35:34+00:00): I removed it because in _my opinion_ unmarked crossing isn't indicating anything, because literally every single inch of a road between 2 sidewalks could be tagged as unmarked crossing. Plus it had tag "name=Crossing", which as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only shouldn't be used a made up descriptors of features.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152832212