piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2024-06-12 10:04:14+00:00): Dag Emiel...  Wanneer je paden vastplakt aan de landuse wordt de kaart moeilijk werkbaar voor volgende mappers. Ik heb wat losgemaakt.
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway
  	1
Maak altijd een verbinding met kruisende wegen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-06-12 10:05:53+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=152578661
Emiel3673 (2024-06-12 14:51:41+00:00): Hallo Eggie,
Bedankt voor de feedback en de correctie. Ik zal er in de toekomst rekening mee houden. 
Ik heb ook nog een vraag: Weet je ook waarom aaneengesloten stukken bos soms, maar niet altijd, gescheiden zijn als er een pad doorheen loopt? Het lijkt  nu net alsof zo'n pad dan tussen twee verschillende bossen in loopt? Kan ik hier ergens informatie over vinden?

Alvast bedankt
eggie (2024-06-12 15:06:22+00:00): Hoi..

Even eerst een trucje om plakken te voorkomen.. Gebruik de linker alttoets tijdens intekenen.
Dan de witruimtes met of zonder pad.

Dat is ontstaan tijdens de import van 3dShapes.
Die werkten met percelen uit het Kadaster. Soms is het wel handig want de bossen kunnen verschillen. Bv naaldbomen en/of loofbomen. Dat kun je ook taggen.
In bossen kun je gewoon een pad intekenen over de landuse heen. Je hoeft geen witruimte te creëren.
Weghalen hoeft natuurlijk ook niet. 
Zal even kijken of er nog iets over die import is te vinden.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-06-12 15:10:32+00:00): Hier nog een draadje uit 2011.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/3dshapes-import-leiden/53871
We konden indertijd aangeven dat we ons eigen werk niet lieten overschrijven, maar de kaart was grotendeels wit in die tijd.
We tekenden zelf de landuse in mbv locale kennis en yahoo. Luchtfoto's hadden we niet.
Nu zijn de 3dshapes gewoon verouderd en je kunt gerust de landuse aanpassen en dan source 3dshapes verwijderen. 
gr eggie
literan (2024-06-12 12:38:46+00:00): кривой формат адрески 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
miluethi (2024-06-12 12:00:20+00:00): Hi Priscilla,

Please square out all your building shapes by pressing the “Q” key and selecting a building.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua
ratrun (2024-06-13 15:39:11+00:00): Hi, 

your new way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291253135 needs to be split into separate segments as it is overlapping and unconnected with the existing road network. Please note that OSM is not the correct place to upload  individual tour suggestions, which seems to be the case for me given from the assigned name of the way. I also would ask to provide the source for your edit. 
Thank you!
HPBC (2024-06-14 06:46:49+00:00): Hi this track is an official track done by the municipality. I do not understand whay splitting this track into severals. this predestrian track is dirt road and a bit of asphalt road for the return.
Best regards
ratrun (2024-06-14 14:22:10+00:00): The splitting of the way into several segments is important as the route follows already mapped walking infrastructure. Otherwise ways get mapped twice, which needs to be avoided. 

As you say that this is an offical route then please create a route relation, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking
literan (2024-06-12 11:24:50+00:00): кривой формат адрески. Делайте правильно, с пробелами перед буквами: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2


передайте эту информацию начальству, пусть донесут до всех правщиков, иначе вас всех может ждать массовая блокировка
wambacher (2024-06-13 13:37:09+00:00): done
söm4324 (2024-07-08 07:11:55+00:00): Hallo Akkurator, ist die Sperrung beendet und kann die Straße wieder freigegeben werden?
Akkurator (2024-07-08 08:08:26+00:00): Weiß nicht, ich komme da nicht oft vorbei. 
Was sagt Verkehrsinfo-bw, siehe note?
söm4324 (2024-07-08 08:17:21+00:00): ah, da steht 19.07., dauert also wieder mal länger als geplant. :)
literan (2024-06-12 12:33:20+00:00): нафига на подъезд повесили адреску?
literan (2024-06-12 12:32:56+00:00): кривой формат адрески. Отсутствует пробел перед буквой "к".
Eleanor777 (2024-06-18 07:37:36+00:00): Спасибо, буду ставить пробел
arkarjun (2024-06-29 17:58:05+00:00): Thank you for mapping #Reviewed_Good #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152579995
adiatmad (2024-06-19 08:57:09+00:00): Good day, Sir! You surveyed these objects, and I wanted to confirm if their locations are correct, as both have the same name and amenity tag. Thanks
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/11975075092)
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/11975082303)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152580668
Pavy_555 (2024-06-19 09:55:44+00:00): Hi Adi yes i they are the same POI but one building is for Mal Shelter cow another for the Female
adiatmad (2024-06-20 06:14:21+00:00): Thanks for your reply Sir, based on the two links I shared earlier, both pointing to information about a male cow shelter.  Would you mind double-checking?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152580668
Pavy_555 (2024-06-20 06:40:08+00:00): Hi Adi i corrected it now , One to the South was a Female Cow Shelter the other one was a male .
JeroenvanderGun (2024-06-12 10:32:53+00:00): Ook gecontroleerd met BRT-achtergrondkaart
emersonveenstra (2024-06-13 11:42:26+00:00): Hi there,

Just to double check, adding highway=construction means that the road is physically unusable for all forms of transport (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction). Since there's driveways and houses attached to some of these sections (like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/943843950 connects to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291714425), I wanted to make sure that it is truly unusable, and not something like "Road Closed to Through Traffic"
Sustainer0296 (2024-06-13 12:11:15+00:00): as far as I know it's closed completely. I'd assume they'd let you through if you live there.
https://mdotjboss.state.mi.us/MiDrive/map?constZone=true&lat=42.72313163065998&lon=-85.25667874732117&zoom=13
If my edits were incorrect, I apologise, I'm newer to this.
Sustainer0296 (2024-06-13 12:15:51+00:00): I might be heading to freeport later today; if so, I will stop by the road in question to find out for sure.
literan (2024-06-12 12:31:53+00:00): нет такого города "Европа-2". Зачем вы ставите такой тег?
trapicki (2024-07-05 07:41:03+00:00): I doubt that this mapping of buildings here is correct. Just checking against the elevation (3500m) and the oreogrphy (very steep mountain cliff), the things you mapped are rather rocks. I can hardly get them to match with the current Bing imagery.
Please also make sure you "square" your buildings.
Please correct that, no use for ghost buildings.
adiatmad (2024-06-20 06:23:27+00:00): Hello Pavy_555 sir, do you think this tag suits this object?
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/11975080650)
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dkindergarten
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152581496
Pavy_555 (2024-06-20 06:34:41+00:00): Yes Adi this is a Pre Primary School , It is for Children below the first grade
addyx (2024-06-26 17:00:34+00:00): Can you please explain what is corrected? And how was the previous model incorrect?
Did you see the history of the road? Specifically https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151888383

This kind of overzealous agenda driven mapping does us no good. Please revert this change.
addyx (2024-07-03 14:30:23+00:00): Can someone revert this mindless edit? 
The version in my edit (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151888383) is the correct one.
@Vonter?
addyx (2024-07-08 15:09:29+00:00): Reverting it myself because I cannot stand bad map data.
Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153708176
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-12 12:33:23+00:00): Hello aleksandar base to my observation your mapping is look good so keep it going.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152581655
aTarom (2024-06-12 11:38:19+00:00): Razón para eliminación de name:ca en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1241644022/history
?
Changeset discussion no acorde a lo editado
Sin novedad en
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/50
mavl (2024-06-13 16:05:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:05:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:05:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
Tatiana24 (2024-06-13 16:12:26+00:00): Добрый день! Подскажите, пожалуйста, что я не так сделала? я уже ничего не понимаю. Раньше никаких проблем не возникало с этим заданием.
mavl (2024-06-13 17:04:18+00:00): Добрый вечер. Номер дома:  
addr:housenumber=8Ес2  
  
Это ошибка. Вам уже сообщали об этом:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152537023  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
mavl (2024-06-13 16:05:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-12 15:29:37+00:00): Hello Mr. akuksouski_lyft  according to observation your mapping looks good so keep it up.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152582500
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
Langlaeufer (2024-06-13 10:26:48+00:00): Warum wurde der highway-Typ hier geändert?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152582538
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
Langlaeufer (2024-06-13 10:25:00+00:00): Warum hast du den highway-type geändert?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152582820
mavl (2024-06-13 16:05:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
NeisBot (2024-06-12 11:36:26+00:00): Hi TRChrizz, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1291732345

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
TRChrizz (2024-06-12 13:26:35+00:00): local knowledge, grenzt and den Naturteich an, Wiese und Schotter, mit Sitzbänken und Mülltonnen, im Sommer wenn die Wiese gemäht ist wird dieser Bereich als Liegewiese verwendet, es wird in dem Teich auch gebadet, Offiziell keine Badewasserqualität, aber auch kein Badeverbot
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-12 15:39:43+00:00): Danke für die Antwort.
Sieht gut aus!

#HappyMapping
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:05:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
nevw (2024-06-12 22:48:35+00:00): Hi, welcome to osm. You have been adding invalid multipolygons. 
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.34933&lat=-24.86866&zoom=14
There are examples of invalid types here
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
You should use building:part relation kind instead or else use delete all the multipolygons and use simple polygons to draw each section.
nevw (2024-06-15 04:13:31+00:00): Have you decided how you are going to fix all these buildings?
nevw (2024-06-17 10:53:42+00:00): I will try to fix these myself over the next few days. Building relations and building:part mapping is not very familiar to me so let me know if you think I have made errors.
HaPe-CZ (2024-06-18 16:51:27+00:00): Ahoj, nejsem tvůj pes aby si mi dával rozkazy. Vzkazy ani nečtu každý den a popravdě, ukaž jak umíš precizně editovat ty. Zde jsi nevytvořil ani jednu novou čáru, nový objekt. Tak se neptej jak se rozhodují jiní a jdi první s vzorovým příkladem.
eggie (2024-06-12 14:55:47+00:00): Dag S Marik  Wanneer je foot=no gaat taggen op alle fietspaden zal het hier niet meer routeren voor wandelaars.
Please don't add foot=no to cycleway in the Netherlands.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-06-12 14:57:01+00:00): removed foot=no 
It's allowed to walk on cycleways in the Netherlands.
Greetz,
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-28 05:33:10+00:00): Jakim był powód było usunięcia loc_name=Małopolska ? Było to celowe?

Dodałem short_name=Małopolska z powrotem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183285631
pavvv (2026-05-28 06:47:21+00:00): To błędna nazwa. Małopolska to też Radom na przykład, który jest w Mazowieckim. Równie dobrze można by dodać ten tag do województwa świętokrzyskiego, które też jest całkowicie w Małopolsce. Do tego użycie short_name też nie ma sensu i pokazuje Twoją nieznajomość tematu.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-28 17:57:43+00:00): nie zmienia to faktu że "Małopolska" jest też otocznie używane jako krótka nazwa województwa małopolskiego, jeśli nie byłeś tego świadom to na przyszłość zachowaj większą ostrożność w grzebaniu przy nazwach czy obrażaniu ludzi
pavvv (2026-05-28 21:24:54+00:00): > nie zmienia to faktu że "Małopolska" jest też otocznie używane jako krótka nazwa województwa małopolskiego

Być może tak, ale jest to błędne, a błędów nie mapujemy. Identyczna sytuacja jak nazywanie województwa śląskiego "Śląskiem", choć to jest jeszcze bardziej błędne że względu na to, że Wrocław jest jego stolicą.

> zachowaj większą przy obrażaniu ludzi

czy wskazywanie niewiedzy jest obrażaniem? nie każdy wie wszystko, więc warto czasami zwrócić na coś uwagę.
uważam takie nazewnictwo za błędne, czyli niewarte dodawania do OSM, albo w ostateczności jako loc_name, czyli bardziej potoczna nazwa, a błędne określenia czasami pasują do tej kategorii. na pewno nie jest to krótka nazwa, bo wyraz "Małopolska" nie zawiera się w wyrazie "Małopolskie", tylko jest zmianą samogłoski, stąd lingwistyczne short_name nie ma sensu. tak więc albo w ogóle można nie dodawać, albo loc_name, albo jako kompromis is_in:region czy coś takiego, bo może ciężko być wyrysować cały historyczny region na mapie.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-29 11:55:09+00:00): > Być może tak, ale jest to błędne, a błędów nie mapujemy.

jak najbardziej mapujemy, jak coś jest nazywane systematycznie w dany sposób to można i powinno to być dodane jako nazwa

tak samo jak mapujemy nielegalnie zbudowane budynki, szkodliwe społecznie biznesy, skutki zbrodniczych akcji czy kasujemy nielegalnie wycięte drzewa
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-29 11:56:10+00:00): > na pewno nie jest to krótka nazwa, bo wyraz "Małopolska" nie zawiera się w wyrazie "Małopolskie"

[citation needed]
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-29 11:56:56+00:00): > czy wskazywanie niewiedzy jest obrażaniem?

zależy w jaki sposób się to robi, wydaje mi się że tutaj robiłeś to (1) błędnie (2) w funkcji wyzwiska
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-29 11:58:06+00:00): > albo w ostateczności jako loc_name

tak było zanim przyszłeś i wadliwie skasowałeś
od biedy też tam pasuje, ale na pewno całkiem wywalenie było błędne
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
eggie (2024-06-12 14:48:05+00:00): Dag TK   Beter alleen de bedrijfsinfo vewijderen. Nu heb je het adres ook verwijderd van de kaart.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=152583173
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-06-12 14:49:47+00:00): Adresnode hersteld.
eggie (2024-06-13 14:51:04+00:00): PB contact
Langlaeufer (2024-06-13 10:22:34+00:00): Die Straße war bereits vorhanden.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152583198
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
twF6wdEYwL (2024-06-12 15:42:52+00:00): 你好，謝謝你對台灣地區地圖的貢獻
但OSM是反應真實世界的地圖
因此不能在地圖上隨便畫在現實世界中不存在的虛構事物或記號
例如以公路的標籤畫的愛心記號
在現實世界中就沒有以這樣的地理分佈存在
請你修正或回退本變更集
並請記住，OSM是紀錄真實世界的地理資訊的地圖資料庫
謝謝
https://osmcha.org/changesets/152583254?filters=%7B%22users%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%E6%98%93%E5%A6%82%E5%8F%8D%E6%8E%8C%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%E6%98%93%E5%A6%82%E5%8F%8D%E6%8E%8C%22%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%7D
Supaplex (2024-06-13 05:01:06+00:00): 已經回退：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152613257
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152583254
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
Langlaeufer (2024-06-14 09:16:42+00:00): Danke. Am besten auch bei sowas gleich die Nachbarkanten kontrollieren. Die waren auch noch auf access=no. Alles ein Überbleibsel einer Sperrung wegen Baustelle. Access=yes kann übrigens entfallen, weil der Standardwert.
Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152583301
OliverMi1 (2024-06-14 12:55:32+00:00): Habe ich gesehen, ich war mir jedoch unsicher, ob der weitere Straßenverlauf nicht noch gesperrt ist, weil irgendwo dort gebaut wird. Ich hatte nur noch keine Zeit weiter zu überprüfen. Aber jetzt hast du das ja gemacht