piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisRevert (2026-03-26 23:33:19+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180479505
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
iandees (2026-03-18 21:14:33+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6346970772 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180079464, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-03-18 21:09:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13634009018 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Trailer dealer"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-26 23:33:23+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180479509
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-03-18 21:12:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13634313272 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Nursery"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-26 23:33:27+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180479512
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
mdejean (2026-03-24 13:48:06+00:00): OpenStreetMap is not for fantasy mapping or your proposals.
91doggos (2026-03-30 02:34:16+00:00): Alright, thank you for letting me know
rodolfovargas (2026-03-18 23:44:58+00:00): Muy buenos aportes. Continua con tus aportes.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
AwFi (2026-04-01 13:30:14+00:00): Ciao, 
ho visto che hai modificato un paio di relazioni ferroviarie ripristinando l'operator ad RFI. Dopo una discussione con la community si è deciso di utilizzare il nome esteso come da standard OSM. Qui trovi la discussione: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rete-ferroviaria-italiana-differenze-di-nome-osm-wikidata-e-nome-ufficiale/140123
Buon mapping!
Wally_PL (2026-03-18 22:12:37+00:00): Hej, mam pytanie odnośnie semaforów na stacji Hrubieszów Miasto. Można wiedzieć, skąd wziąłeś ich oznaczenia i lokalizację? Pytam, bo prawdopodobnie przejazd kolejowy na ul. Nowej został doposażony w sygnalizację świetlną oraz rogatki (wakacje 2025, remont związany z budową LCS-u w Zawadzie), ale nie znalazłem żadnych zdjęć z terenu.
Anas masuris (2026-03-18 22:56:17+00:00): A zapomniałem dać w źródłach bazakolejowa (tam jest zdjęcie z 2025 z nowymi semaforami)
Wally_PL (2026-03-19 12:51:10+00:00): OK, dzięki. Czyli jednak trzeba szukać dalej...
Anas masuris (2026-03-19 16:46:56+00:00): https://www.bazakolejowa.pl/index.php?dzial=stacje&id=883&ed=0&okno=galeria&str=4&photoid=329603

Nie wiem, jak z semaforem N (być może już D xd) z jego umiejscowieniem
Wally_PL (2026-03-21 17:16:33+00:00): Szczerze mówiąc, celowo nie ruszałem stacji przy LK72 (pomimo tego, że wiedziałem o przebudowie), bo bez zdjęć satelitarnych ciężko nanieść dokładnie lokalizację semaforów. Z Zawadą, Zamościem i Miączynem poczekałbym na ortofotomapę wysokiej rozdzielczości - przy okazji poprawiłoby się układ torowy, bo ten też miał się zmienić. W Hrubieszowie miały chyba zostać zlikwidowane dwa rozjazdy od strony Zamościa. Sam budynek LCS w Zawadzie też stoi, tylko ciężko go nanieść na podstawie jedynie zdjęć z poziomu ziemi.

Swoją drogą, w krzakach (po stronie wschodniej) jest jeszcze jeden tor, nawet z semaforem (tyle że starym). :)
https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=1502586908534406&set=pcb.1502601618532935
Anas masuris (2026-03-21 17:32:13+00:00): Tam w krzakach jest stara tarcza manewrowa od bocznicy (odcięta od sieci) z tego co wiem xd

Natomiast jeśli już się zabierzesz za aktualizację stacji w tym rejonie, to zachęcam do skorzystania z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:OpenRailwayMap/Tagging_in_Poland :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-18 21:29:32+00:00): hmm, maybe these should not be edited under this justification

moved to "needs approval list", checked all four edited
streckenkundler (2026-03-18 21:53:39+00:00): stoppe endlich deinen Bot!
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-18 22:52:38+00:00): all entries were checked manually
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-18 22:52:51+00:00): as posted ABOVE your comment
eggie (2026-03-19 06:53:47+00:00): Beste Dirk,

Actueel maken is prima, maarrrrrrr... 
Wanneer je fietspaden weghaalt en dan de hoofdrijbaan op slot laat zal het hier niet meer routeren voor fietsers en voetgangers.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=180079862
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-19 07:05:39+00:00): Ik heb het weer routeerbaar gemaakt.
en het fietsverbod verwijderd.
Ook een paar voetgangersverbindingen gemaakt. Apart ingetekende trottoirs levert anders enorme omwegen op. 

MVG
eggie
JezCrow (2026-03-19 21:02:19+00:00): Hi belljaf, I notice you've altered the parish boundaries for Alwoodley and Harewood, however the data you have used are the electoral wards of Leeds City Council, which are completely different. See the difference here:
- Alwoodley parish: https://mapit.mysociety.org/area/153821.html
- Alwoodley electoral ward of Leeds City Council: https://mapit.mysociety.org/area/152422.html
mbeyerle (2026-03-21 21:06:58+00:00): Thanks, ForestFurnace! Appreciate your diligent work on the map in the Centre Region.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:58:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
jhaluska80 (2026-03-19 17:09:17+00:00): I reverted this change.  The correct course of action to is to change it to a path, and update the access tag to private which I did.  I also added the fences and gates.

OSM maps private roads all the time, if we just delete them people may readd them incorrectly.
pwbriggs (2026-03-19 03:46:44+00:00): Thanks. And address isn't "demolished" so don't add demolished prefixes to those tags. I've added them back on the building. Thanks!
habi (2026-03-19 08:11:15+00:00): Ciao En Zwo Oh
Solange die Gebäude noch auf den Luftfotos zu sehen sind, ist es besser, diese als 'abgerissen' zu markieren, damit diese nicht einfach wieder von jemandem eingetragen werden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix

Ich habe das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180094967 korrgiert.

Gruss,
habi
En Zwo Oh (2026-03-19 08:19:12+00:00): Perfekt, danke vielmals :-)
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
marvin3 (2026-03-23 12:17:49+00:00): Hallo Matze
Super dass du Details zur Kirche hinzugefügt hast.
Der Tag "building:part" ist allerdings wichtig und sollte nicht durch "building" ersetzt werden, weil es sich ja um ein zusätzlich eingezeichneten Gebäudeteil handelt.
Die "building:levels=8" waren tatsichlich nicht ganz richtig. Ich habe das jetzt mit "height=24" ersetzt. (Weil 1 Level = 3m)

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Marvin
matze089 (2026-03-26 05:55:59+00:00): Hallo Marvin, 
danke für deine Nachricht. Eigentlich wollte ich nur darstellen, daß es sich um einen Kirchturm handelt. Symbol sieht auf der Karte auch nicht schön aus. Ich werde es wieder als Gebäudeteil einzeichnen.
matze089 (2026-03-26 06:03:08+00:00): Hallo Marvin, 
sorry, habe gerade gesehen, dass du das schon gemacht hast. Danke. 
Gruß, 
Matze
jayaddison (2026-03-19 11:41:44+00:00): Thanks for the updates - the shape one of the ways seems unexpected after the edits; could you take a look?  It is: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434879816
Zaneo (2026-03-27 17:06:12+00:00): There's a staircase that cuts into the pedestrian way.
Zaneo (2026-03-27 17:06:57+00:00): Each stair extends a little further to the right until it leave a small area. The new gap on the right is where another large staircase is.
jayaddison (2026-03-27 22:12:48+00:00): Thanks - I agree that the step feature -- including handrails on at least one wall of the building -- could be refined.  To begin with I have simplified the shape: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180523240
Zaneo (2026-03-28 03:35:39+00:00): The current version is an over simplification I feel, that sliver I cut out cannot be navigated with a wheelchair.

For me the pedestrian area represents an area that can be navigated without passing though steps. Had it been a ramp that would be a different story.

What I had added can be seen here: https://dynamic-media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-o/32/a5/2a/71/cool.jpg?w=1000&h=-1&s=1

Shown better here: https://files.nms.ac.uk/production/Documents/National-Museum-of-Scotland/2024/Visual-Story-Main-Entrance-Updated-10-May-2024.pdf?dm=1719843440

Those white lines are the step edge markers.


Not yet added is the right side entrance:
https://queensferry.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/edinburgh-national-museums-chambers-street.webp

or: https://www.edinburgharchitecture.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/national-museum-scotland-edinburgh-aw-520x390.webp

Note these images are just reference we should not use them to add the feature.

Which has a step up and therefore a disconnect from the pedestrian way.
IpswichEdits (2026-03-19 09:29:26+00:00): Really great work here! That's a lot of work and also the improvements on addresses and other info too. Out of interest, do you have a tool to help speed this up or is it totally manual looking at the FHRS website and updating one by one? In the past I've only ever done a few FHRS ID edits at a time. Thanks!
EdLoach (2026-03-19 09:35:24+00:00): I checked one edit near Harwich, and the change seemed to be to add addr:county, but counties haven't been part of postal addresses for many, many years now, so I don't tend to include them, and this page in the wiki includes addr:county in the tags to avoid section
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom
IpswichEdits (2026-03-21 17:22:46+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out. I wasn't aware of the county tag advice. I wasn't the map editor here in this changeset but I'll keep it in mind. Thanks.
smsm1 (2026-03-21 17:49:48+00:00): I've been using this tool https://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhodot/?lat=52.01106&lon=1.11172&zoom=9&layer=fhrs which adds the county if it's in the address when using the add via josm remote control link. If I'm not sure about the tag it's adding as per the address I try to remember to remove it by intriguing the check box. Agree counties are a rare concept, especially up in Scotland.
IpswichEdits (2026-03-21 19:30:11+00:00): Thanks for the info on the tool, @smsm1!
MappingMore (2026-03-19 23:37:51+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180133260
NeisBot (2026-03-18 23:33:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1467737017 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dental Clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-27 05:33:12+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180485308
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
cesium2349 (2026-05-20 18:33:36+00:00): what is the untagged area adjacent? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1490401542
Frans S (2026-03-20 16:19:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You mapped a through-going road as a track. Check the route of a trace before you decide how to tag it.
This should be tagged as an unclassified highway. I changed it.
Best regards and keep mapping
kingkingHK (2026-03-19 01:49:03+00:00): Again, please use `route_ref=` instead of abusing `network=`.
silversurfer83 (2026-03-20 21:29:04+00:00): Hi again :)

the benches both look good
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180084405
silversurfer83 (2026-03-20 21:28:25+00:00): Hi there BeeBuzz01 :)

thanks for taking the time to contribute to this project. You asked for a review of this changeset:

- looks solid :)

some things to change or consider:

- capacity=* is currently only defined for numbers not ranges. So maybe set it to "6"

- charge=* should be used if fee=yes. Since it seems to be free parking you should remove the charge tag and add fee=no

if there are any questions please reach out. The US community can be found at slack and c.osm.org or you can join any of the many chat groups like the ones on Signal

happy mapping
dknelson9876 (2026-04-15 02:39:32+00:00): Hi Flap Slimy Outward,

I discussed this change with multiple other locals in person, and we all agreed that these changes don't make sense. I've taken care of reverting for you.
whitepanda (2026-03-26 09:13:09+00:00): Reverted in changeset ID: 180142505
iandees (2026-03-19 02:55:01+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13657210683 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180085799, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
dknelson9876 (2026-04-15 02:39:45+00:00): Hi Flap Slimy Outward,

I discussed this change with multiple other locals in person, and we all agreed that these changes don't make sense. I've taken care of reverting for you.
nevw (2026-03-19 04:19:38+00:00): I think you added a duplicate defibrillator here and I have deleted the duplicate. Let me know if there are in fact two of them at this location.
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2026-03-19 10:59:25+00:00): Hi and welcome to the OpenStreetMap community!

Consider writing changeset comments: without any comment it is very difficult to review modifications.

Here you could for instance have said “Adding height to building and surface to the parking” or something like that. This could really help!

See this page for a longer reference: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks in advance.
Taksine (2026-06-21 08:11:11+00:00): МЕСТНЫЙ ЯЗЫК!Вы что, слепой? В Китае нет правила, обязывающего всех говорить по-русски!（以上为google translate）
MappingMore (2026-03-22 09:04:28+00:00): Partially Revert of 180137627
MappingMore (2026-03-20 09:32:50+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180149053; 180149262
rajdhani (2026-03-24 09:31:00+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180343212
TrickyFoxy (2026-06-24 23:00:43+00:00): 1. Google Maps does not use OpenStreetMap
2. You broke the residential area's polygon
javbw (2026-04-01 05:19:19+00:00): This changeset contains many mismapped fords, such as
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13660455835/history

Please be more careful when resolving conflicts. All of these fords are actually bridges or culverts. fords are very rare in Japan, even in rural farming areas. 

Please choose "add a bridge" or "add a culvert" instead.
HAALAND_ (2026-03-21 12:16:58+00:00): 请问您删除的这些poi都是不存在的了吗
旧加卷 (2026-03-21 19:13:05+00:00): 根据我所了解到的情况，是的
4个名称为 Марина 的POI同时指向“玛丽娜宾馆”
有多家名称为 Марина 的咖啡店实际上不存在
node/4324240608 node/3062724707实为餐厅
存在两个名称为 Миша Магазин 的POI实际上指向名称为 Яша Магазин 的商店
node/4345649896 属于医院
如有误还请指正
HAALAND_ (2026-03-22 08:44:12+00:00): 好的好的我只是确认一下
Lokai (2026-03-21 06:18:36+00:00): Hallo,

Vor einigen Wochen, war ich mit dem Fahrrad auf der K 4 unterwegs. Dort zu fahren war recht unbequem!

Der Umwidmung war im Gespräch. Wann wurde diese beschlossen. Gibt es darüber etwas zu lesen den Zeitpunkt der Umwidmung?

Welche Beschilderung ist dort nun angebracht?

Gruß 

L.
309_308_307 (2026-03-21 17:09:52+00:00): Hallo,

die Umwidmung ist schon lange beschlossen, hing aber noch an einer Sanierung der parallel verlaufenden L390 Höringen-Winnweiler. Jetzt findet aber der Vollzug statt:

https://lbm.rlp.de/service/presse-aktuelles/detail/kreisstrasse-4-wird-zum-rad-und-wirtschaftsweg-umgebaut
https://www.rheinpfalz.de/lokal/donnersbergkreis_artikel,-kreisstra%C3%9Fe-bei-winnweiler-wird-zum-rad-und-wirtschaftsweg-umgebaut-_arid,5867032.html

Die neue Beschilderung kenne ich noch nicht, deshalb habe ich dort eine Notiz erstellt, falls dort jemand vorbei kommt.
Lokai (2026-03-21 17:26:05+00:00): Danke für den Verweis zur Seite.
Gut zu wissen, dass der Weg zur Zeit gesperrt ist, dann meide ich die Strecke bis Mai.
FajrAl (2026-03-19 12:32:13+00:00): I think place=hamlet is perfect tag for kampong.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Malaysia/Other_tagging_aspects
jnighan (2026-04-18 15:58:18+00:00): Hi, just FYI, landuse=religious is not used in CT for areas that are a single place of worship and minimal other features (parking lot, etc.). It is only used for larger religious campuses, monasteries, etc. For example, the Archdiocese of Hartford campus: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/915932770
Zack Bowden (2026-04-18 16:56:34+00:00): Oh, okay thanks. Good to know :)
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:02:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
iandees (2026-03-19 05:51:44+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13335150899, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5279568149 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180090191, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
NeisBot (2026-03-19 06:00:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13660598928 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Waxing shop"
---
예를 들어, 당신의 텍스트에 더 중립적이고 사실적인 버전은 "왁싱샵" 일 수 있다
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-27 11:33:04+00:00): 👍 Thank you for removing the text by https://osm.org/changeset/180090693
eggie (2026-03-19 07:20:34+00:00): Dag Andrzej Jarmoniuk,
Een officetag heb ik toegevoegd ivm rendering. Format phone aangepast +31

Gr eggie