piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ScottWalkerAU (2026-07-09 10:57:41+00:00): The building itself is not layer=1 - that new part you did should probably just be a roof providing it's not enclosed.

If it is enclosed, you'd split the driveway into 3 and join it to the building, marking the middle section as some type of covered :)
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-16 06:17:15+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20954
felipeeugenio (2026-07-09 14:12:42+00:00): Hola.
OSM es un proyecto en inglés. Para agregar tags por favor consultar la wiki o en el chat de la comunidad en telegram en el link en mi perfil, pero por favor no inventar valores en español. Voy a intentar solucionarlo yo con valores que pueda encontrar y que sean válidos.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185383988
willkmis (2026-07-09 12:29:59+00:00): Should this really be in OpenStreetMap if it's completely defunct and mostly razed? It seems better suited for OpenHistoricalMap
Ktr101 (2026-07-24 19:00:44+00:00): There is no way to easily import it, as this is just keeping the historical aspect for this. Because most of this is a trail already, I see no issue with it, although I also tend to be more inclusive with abandoned railway routes if their pathway is visible with cuttings and embankments, if that makes sense.
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-09 14:06:05+00:00): building=static_caravan would be a better update.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185385070
socialdatasource_will (2026-07-09 19:33:55+00:00): If this is the case, change it.
Fraxi (2026-07-09 07:23:41+00:00): Здрасти! По повод https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12294736412 нека приоритетно да бъде работното време на витрината. Сайтът може да не е актуализиран скоро(не само този, а по принцип).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ground_truth
Kaloan-koko (2026-07-11 09:42:58+00:00): Здравей, така и действам. Даже ако видя по-стар сайт ми е ясно да не разчитам въобще. Все пак оставям такива бележки, защото може и да се случи обратното - промени по сайтове могат да станат бързо, а за надписа на витрината сигурно трябва някоя заявка (или по-грозното решение, залепена хартишка).
evgenykatyshev (2026-07-09 08:16:13+00:00): Strange value of the check_date tag. Did you add it manually?
Mashin (2026-07-16 19:09:27+00:00): Thanks, not sure how that happened.
MassCartog (2026-07-09 15:12:55+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. Could you explain more why you removed all these trails? Do these trails exist on the ground still today?
JackieJiia (2026-07-10 07:28:56+00:00): Hi, this is a request from Maryland Park Service Department of Natural Resources. Five trails will be permanently closed and need to be removed from the map. 

- Bodhi's Short Cut
- Goat Trail
- Mudlick Trail
- Savage River Trail
- Mt. Aetna Trail
MassCartog (2026-07-10 15:44:52+00:00): Thanks for the reply. So wanted to let you know that's not really how it works on OSM. OpenStreetMap is about what exists on the ground today, not what will exist. So trails that "will be" closed but currently exist, should not be removed from the OSM database.

Another thing to note is when a trail is closed it does not cease to exist overnight, so removing it is also incorrect. In OSM we use access tags for features that still physically exist on the ground, but their access has been restricted. So in this case instead of removing trails, tagging them access=no would be a better option.

Once there is no longer a trail on the ground (its completely demolished/overgrown) then feel free to removed it. But until then, please follow the OSM community guidelines found on the wiki. Thanks!

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
Glassman (2026-07-09 22:48:15+00:00): According to county records this road is Sarkis Lane. Please do not removed verified features. While this road is privately maintained, it is still visible and can be mapped in OSM.

If you have any questions, please respond to this comment. 

I'll also send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185386070
BCNorwich (2026-07-10 08:22:17+00:00): Hi, Is Way: Jagiot Road (803372097) really a oneway road?
SomeoneElse (2026-07-10 14:43:04+00:00): Hello,
Can you explain what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1536748923/history#map=17/39.817609/84.825041&layers=S is please?
Best Regards,
Andy
manjita pandey (2026-07-28 05:51:21+00:00): Hello, This building has been added as a part of system development test. This can be confirmed by host URL. Please revert this feature and we will ensure to not add any frictional features on coming days.
SomeoneElse (2026-07-10 14:44:21+00:00): Hello,
Is there really a cafeteria at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13999371522#map=17/39.817853/84.825606&layers=S ?  It looks like desert to me.
Best Regards,
Andy
manjita pandey (2026-07-28 05:50:08+00:00): Hello, This building has been added as a part of system development test. Please revert this feature and we will ensure to not add any frictional features on coming days.
BCNorwich (2026-07-10 09:11:55+00:00): The new highway you've added Way: 1536752143 duplicates existing highways thus disrupting routing. It is OSM practice that if a feature needs amending/correcting the correction is done to any existing feature. This maintains the features OSM history. Please don't map a highwat on top of an existing highway.

I've removed the duplication.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2026-07-10 09:14:34+00:00): The new highway you've added Way: 1536752144 is removed for the same reason as stated above.
BCNorwich (2026-07-10 09:16:22+00:00): Way: 1536752145 also removed, duplication.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-09 13:27:42+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185407803
Loopslol7 (2026-07-09 17:26:08+00:00): yay!

Thank you for editing openstreetmap!

By the way, in this area, there is 2023 othoimagery from the city of Eureka. I think it is a better source than the bing here.

Also, its not wrong not to include it, but if you know the address numbers of these houses that would be fantastic to add :)

Happy mapping!
Chirandin (2026-07-09 19:05:20+00:00): Ah okay thanks for the feedback, just trying out map tracing. Will take that in consideration in future edits 👍
Loopslol7 (2026-07-15 04:01:59+00:00): glad that you were trying it out, we always need more people editing, especially out in rural areas like this :D.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-09 11:59:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3439661423 is actual one
eggie (2026-07-09 09:38:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-09 09:39:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
literan (2026-07-13 19:56:37+00:00): подскажите, каким образом на местности обозначены эти маршруты?
NickMonk (2026-07-17 10:39:05+00:00): Добрый день. Пока никак - это проект - нарисуем разметку краской или сигнальной лентой разметим со временем.
literan (2026-07-18 08:49:44+00:00): тогда я переделаю тег с route=bicycle на proposed:route=bicycle
woodpeck (2026-07-09 08:27:57+00:00): Dear CikaAki93, the upload comment field is intended for you to supply information about the edit. "CikaAki" is not a good changeset comment. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for details!
soliMM (2026-07-10 06:15:41+00:00): Hi CikaAki93, can you provide more information about your edits, and are these edits related to a video game called Farming Simulator? 

Note for others, we had in past different user (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Deronje) who was tracing and naming farmlands in similar manner with numerical values. The community found out that user was doing it for farming simulator, hence my question above. If this is the case, then this changeset (and all the others) should probably be reverted, especially because in this one the user deleted bunch of multipolygons and seemingly correct data.
Duja (2026-07-13 13:03:38+00:00): I restored some of worst broken polygons (Moharač lake and national park forest). However, I agree that the edits are at best pointless and at worst destructive - they deleted a lot of valid landcover and added some non-existing one (SUMA BIG, SUMA ERDEVIK?!)
MaliMrav (2026-07-19 08:31:56+00:00): I see some spelling errors that I wanted to correct (Suma instead of Šuma, Igraliste instead of Igralište), or even better to remove names altogether, but I am reluctant to make any changes until we decide if we revert changed from CikaAki93 or not.

Any suggestions?
Duja (2026-07-19 09:16:37+00:00): There are some good edits and some bad edits, and he apparently does not plan to fix it. But rather than reverting, I plan to salvage and clean up what I can (remove trivial and numeric names, restore farmland and residential areas), so please wait with corrections.
MaliMrav (2026-07-19 13:03:20+00:00): Ok, will do.
Duja (2026-07-23 10:28:46+00:00): Done in #186220054, #186222689 and #186225419
tux67 (2026-07-09 11:24:28+00:00): Hallo kisaki73,

ich hatte ja schon beim ersten Change was erläutert. 
Daraufhin solltet ihr eine Mail bekommen haben. 
Darauf entweder antworten, oder direkt im Changeset 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185392213
einen Kommentar erfassen. (Oder eine Nachricht direkt an mich schicken https://www.openstreetmap.org/messages/new/tux67 )
Helfe gerne soweit ich kann. Ich tagge den Punkt erstmal um, so das es hoffentlich passt.
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185392213
habi (2026-07-10 14:15:42+00:00): Ciao Svenimem

Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1536776188/history/1 ist kein https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential im Sinne eines Wohngebiets.
Lustigerweise hat in unmittelbarer Nähe ein andere:r User:in gereade daneben einen Wintergarten als Carport erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Schn%C3%A4ggli%20BJ, het das ächt öppis zäme ds'tüe?
Gruss,
habi
SomeoneElse (2026-07-10 15:04:11+00:00): Hello,
The shape of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1536776953 does not appear to match the imagery.  Can you please explain?
Best Regards,
Andy
manjita pandey (2026-07-28 07:48:54+00:00): This changeset was the part of test datasets unaware that the changesets will be populated on osm production server. You can view the host url to confirm my statement.
We, however, will make sure not to add any test data to osm on days to come.
bxl-forever (2026-07-09 08:43:10+00:00): Hello, @borishag.

I surveyed this shop less than 24 hours ago, here is a picture of the opening hours posted on the door.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5382637
(This is a StreetComplete picture, it will be automatically erased in about a week).

You erased my changeset, presumably because you have a different list of opening hours for your shops.

Since you are running this chain of stores, can you either ask the staff that they post the same hours as the one you are using, or update the hours in your list to match what the local shop is saying. This will prevent conflicting edits in the future. :-)

Many thanks.
borishag (2026-07-09 09:07:54+00:00): Thanks for the info, we will inform the store manager.
habi (2026-07-09 18:50:34+00:00): Hey!
Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1536777034 sieht nicht nach Garage aus, eher nach Wintergarten…
Gruss,
Habi
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 02:01:50+00:00): DWG revert - incorrect  mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185568419
FajrAl (2026-07-19 13:06:16+00:00): It's creating duplicate
habi (2026-07-09 18:46:26+00:00): Hey.
Das scheint kein Carport zu sein.
Gruss,
Habi
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 02:01:51+00:00): DWG revert - incorrect  mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185568419
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-09 09:12:21+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM.

Dürfen wir die Quelle erfahren? :)
habi (2026-07-09 19:32:31+00:00): Hey Sveminem
Bitte trage in OpenStreetMap nur Dinge ein, die in der Realität existieren.
Gruss aus Bern,
Habi
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-10 06:36:01+00:00): Hoi @habi

die anderen neuen User-Accounts von gestern bei diesen Edits hier hast du auch gesehen?

Viele Grüße, Pascal
habi (2026-07-10 11:16:40+00:00): Ja, bin dran :)
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-10 13:10:47+00:00): Danke.
phvdb (2026-07-09 08:55:27+00:00): L'ancier mur est toujours présent
L'ancier parc est en travaux
La sculture est déplacée
jb54osm (2026-07-09 14:12:29+00:00): Dag Bahtrobe,

Je hebt niet alleen de winkel verwijderd, maar ook de adresnode; nu is het adres ook opgeheven 😢.  De juiste manier om een winkel te verwijderen is om de adresnode te Downgraden met een rechtsklik; eventueel voeg je Leegstaande winkel toe.
jb54osm (2026-07-09 14:21:03+00:00): Ik heb nr. 258 handmatig teruggezet.
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-09 09:13:27+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM.

Dürfen wir die Quelle erfahren? :)
habi (2026-07-10 14:29:01+00:00): - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397865568 sieht wie ein Haus + eine Garage aus, wieso hast du das zusammengeführt? Und generell sind Häuser in der Schweiz rechtwinklig gebaut, das kannst du mit der 'Q'-Taste machen....
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397865125/history/1 ist zumindest aufgrund der Luftfotos noch vorhanden. Wenn das Gebäude abgerissen ist, würde ich das mit `razed:building=yes` erfassen, solange es noch auf den Luftfotos zu erkennen ist.

Ich habe das einte Gebäude in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185479657 wieder zurückgeholt und eben als abgerissen markiert.
habi (2026-07-13 06:48:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1536780421 ist keine Baumreihe (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:natural%3Dtree_row), sondern höchstens teilweise eine Hecke (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier%3Dhedge).
Ich habe das - und ein paar andere Dinge - in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185632866 angepasst
Frans S (2026-07-09 13:02:54+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Hi-rise or tall buildings (even with a few storeys) need a different way of drawing them than low buildings.

Please check this footage on how to map these buildings

https://youtu.be/u31wPYWkm3E?si=lDbvDutpUyZWQXXL

A more extended explanation with samples can be seen here
Check here a sample of your mapping 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1536781105/history#map=19/10.469360/-66.621684

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling#Drawing_at_the_roof

Additionally find here a link to how to map complex situations
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Koreller/diary/404988#comment61337


Best regards
habi (2026-07-09 19:39:11+00:00): Hey.
Auch hier; bitte trage keinen Seich in OpenStreetMap ein, hier ist sicher kein Militär-Stützpunkt.
Habi
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-09 09:14:29+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185393930
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 02:08:59+00:00): DWG revert - improper mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185568597
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-09 09:09:29+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM.

Die beiden Autobahn Stücke sind hier nicht ganz ernst gemeint, oder?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1536783067
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1536783068
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-09 09:10:22+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM.

Das Stück Autobahn ist sicher ein Versehen, oder?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1536783066
habi (2026-07-10 14:19:50+00:00): @Schnägli: Mach doch nicht für (fast) jeden deiner Edits einen neuen Account, das ist eher unnötig.

Gruss aus Bern,
habi
habi (2026-07-10 14:45:11+00:00): Ich habe Accounts @Schnägli, @Schnägli_BJ, @Schnäggli_Joel und @Sveminem der https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group gemeldet.
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-09 09:10:43+00:00): Wohl auch eher Quatsch ...
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-09 09:16:09+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185393848
habi (2026-07-10 14:45:19+00:00): Ich habe Accounts @Schnägli, @Schnägli_BJ, @Schnäggli_Joel und @Sveminem der https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group gemeldet.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 02:11:34+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20931
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-09 09:15:26+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185394140
habi (2026-07-10 14:17:43+00:00): @Schnäggli: Du kannst hier gerne einen Parkplatz erfassen, wenn es in der Relität einen gibt. Das wäre dann aber `amenity=parking` und nicht `landuse=cemetery`, was ein Friedhof ist.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185393717
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 02:04:11+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20930
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-09 09:10:56+00:00): Wohl auch eher Quatsch ...
habi (2026-07-10 14:21:23+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185479060
eggie (2026-07-09 10:57:34+00:00): Dag Luuk,

Beter geen landuse vastplakken aan wegen en paden.
De kaart wordt dan onwerkbaar. 
Ik heb wat losgemaakt. 

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=185393873

MVG
eggie
ajmat (2026-07-10 11:47:16+00:00): Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185469563
SomeoneElse (2026-07-10 15:01:24+00:00): Hello, what does "#{nameofyourorganisation}-project-3" mean?
manjita pandey (2026-07-28 07:38:00+00:00): Hello, the changeset is the default changeset if users upload the datasets from other host instance other than tasking manager production server. 

As we were unaware these changesets will be uploaded on osm production, we uploaded few items for test purpose.
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-09 09:15:30+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185393717
habi (2026-07-10 14:45:35+00:00): Ich habe Accounts @Schnägli, @Schnägli_BJ, @Schnäggli_Joel und @Sveminem der https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group gemeldet.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 01:57:14+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20929
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-09 09:11:01+00:00): Wohl auch eher Quatsch ...
habi (2026-07-10 14:45:26+00:00): Ich habe Accounts @Schnägli, @Schnägli_BJ, @Schnäggli_Joel und @Sveminem der https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group gemeldet.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 01:52:01+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20928
pwbriggs (2026-07-13 20:18:08+00:00): Looks good, thanks! My one note is that I don't believe the pound sign (#) belongs in the unit number. So it should be just addr:unit=202. I've updated this; let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks again for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
silversurfer83 (2026-07-09 19:33:34+00:00): Hello Thomas,

please take better care when mapping. There are (many) guidelines laid out in the wiki at wiki.osm.org which explain how things are done at OSM.

Some examples:

- your driveway should be a highway=service + service=driveway

- nearly all of your buildings need squaring (use "Q") and better eyes on more than one background image (there are usually at least two backgrounds available)

- please don't edit UK and Kongo in one changeset. It clutters people's feed.

If you need any kind of assistance please reach out
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185394706
Thomas Parrott (2026-07-09 19:45:57+00:00): Sorry
silversurfer83 (2026-07-12 08:44:50+00:00): Hello Thomas,

thanks for saying Sorry and showing up in the discussion. That's a good first step.

Being new to OSM is totally fine and we welcome everyone keen on helping with the project. We acknowledge that OSM isn't always straightforward and thus we try to help everyone.

It would be much appreciated if you could go ahead and check on your buildings and improve those where needed (to be hones: that's nearly all of them).

If you were to do that before you embark on any new tasks that would be great
Thomas Parrott (2026-07-12 08:52:00+00:00): Ok I will do
Marvk (2026-07-09 13:24:18+00:00): Hallo chbram,

nur als Hinweis für die Zukunft, Apple Look Around ist keine lizenzierte Quelle für OSM

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Apple#Not_to_be_used_for_OSM_mapping

Grüße
Marv
eggie (2026-07-09 09:39:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-09 10:45:33+00:00): Feedback Woensdag van 1900 tot 2100 is niet de juiste format. Gebruik anders deze tool:

openingsuren-tool

http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/


MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-09 10:48:51+00:00): Aangepast naar We 19:00-21:00
silversurfer83 (2026-07-09 19:44:55+00:00): Hi :)

nun sieht es gut aus.

happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185395852
Yog Sot (2026-07-09 20:52:13+00:00): to jest związane z rozkopaniem Biskupińskiej zdaje się, 
Zrobiłem zmiane,, sprawdz czy styka jeśli znajdziesz jakieś źródła
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185435263
habi (2026-07-10 13:39:52+00:00): Ciao Höseler

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Normalerweise tragen Bäume keine Namen, wie kommst du auf die Namen hier?

Gruss aus Bern,
habi
MappingMore (2026-07-09 10:11:35+00:00):  Revert of  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185329335
Marvk (2026-07-09 13:19:03+00:00): Hi chbram,

sieht gut aus! Du könntest noch das Verkehrsschild ergänzen, damit klar ist, aus welcher Quelle die Zugangsrestriktionen folgen, also in diesem Fall vermutlich traffic_sign=DE:260,1026-36

Grüße
Marv
habi (2026-07-10 13:53:59+00:00): Hier ein paar Details zu deiner Änderung:
- Eine Jungschi wird in OpenStreetMap mit `club=scout` erfasst.
- Die `note` von dir ist eher `description` und sollte keine Werbung enthalten.
- Die Öffnungszeiten müssen auch in einem bestimmten Format sein, damit diese ausgelesen werden können: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

Ich habe das alles in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185477451 verbessert.
eggie (2026-07-09 12:28:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Map_HeRo (2026-07-12 18:55:48+00:00): Hallo mv1005,

Du hast hier am grünen Band eine Reihe von Objekten doppelt erfasst und dazu einige Namen frei erfunden, z.B. die "Himmelsschaukel" oder die "Fotostation Freiheitsflügel". Beide Objekt waren bereits gemappt, die Namen sind vor Ort nicht verifizierbar. Bitte vor dem Mappen neuer Objekte erst mal prüfen, ob diese nicht bereits erfasst sind. Ich werde die doppelt erfassten Objekte mit den bereits vorhandenen zusammenlegen.
Gruß Mikke
mv1005 (2026-07-12 20:30:06+00:00): Hi Mikke,

danke für den Hinweis. Ich hatte die vermeintlich neuen Objekte basierend auf meinen Osmand-Daten eingetragen. Ich hatte vergessen, vorher die Daten nochmal zu aktualisieren 🤦‍♀️ ...

Aber was die Namensgebung angeht: Alle Namen der Objekte habe ich vor Ort der Informationstafel entnommen, wo sie genau so bezeichnet werden, wie ich sie benannt habe. Da ist nichts frei erfunden.

LG Markus