piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Aleksei Gurianov (2024-11-05 20:00:32+00:00): Hi Rémi,

### Mechanical Edit Requirements
1. Community consensus required beforehand:
   - Please share or start discussion on community forums
   - See [Mechanical Edits code of conduct](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct#Discuss_your_edit)

2. Documentation needed:
   - Create wiki page describing your editing process
   - Add link to documentation in changeset comments
   - Tag changesets with mechanical=yes

   - See [Mechanical Edits Guidelines](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits)

### Next Steps
1. Pause mechanical edits until:
   - Community consensus reached
   - Documentation created

Key references:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits
Aleksei Gurianov (2024-11-05 20:01:03+00:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZrvcVAPdaWI
mcliquid (2024-11-06 08:29:50+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
NieWnen (2024-11-05 21:24:43+00:00): A skąd ten uniwersytet na cmentarzu?
StC (2024-11-05 21:21:51+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a créé une discontinuité dans un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
mcliquid (2024-11-06 08:28:53+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
SekeRob repair (2024-11-13 11:47:11+00:00): Hi,

Please reply to my previous message. This edit set shows 14 warning where you mapped a tertiary road on top of existing service and residential streets

In Attesa
Tatfahren (2024-11-05 21:09:26+00:00): As far as i can see in the wiki, the value that was previously mapped is documented there in english and german version (didn't look in other  languages), not the one you changed it to.
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2024-11-06 08:51:42+00:00): Hi,
In addition to Tatfahren's comment, consider splitting such changes over large area into several changesets. This greatly helps us reviewing changesets.
For more information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Thanks in advance.
Tatfahren (2024-11-20 20:13:53+00:00): I have now reverted this changeset, because there was no answer. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159383175
Gregory Peony (2024-11-05 20:44:08+00:00): All of these building footprints are valid. Please remember to square the footprnit when appropriate. Know that the roof colour of building can be darker. I recommend zooming out to spot the buildings before zooming in to trace them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158793684
wielandb (2024-11-09 14:40:48+00:00): Oh, ich glaube, dir ist hier das Haus kaputt gegangen. :o
wielandb (2024-11-09 14:45:22+00:00): Ich habe leider keine andere Möglichkeit gefunden dass zu fixen als den Änderungssatz rückgängig zu machen. Ich habe die Zufahrt aber anschließend wieder eingefügt. :)
wielandb (2024-11-20 19:21:43+00:00): Hey :)
Ich habe mir jemanden mit einem iPhone geschnappt und habe mal ausprobiert, wie das so ist in Go Map!! einen Weg zu teilen. 
Ich hatte gedacht es ist vielleicht ein Bug, aber so wie es aussieht ist es nicht so.

Du hast scheinbar beim Teilen des Driveway versehentlich das Haus geteilt anstatt die Straße. :( Naja macht nichts, jetzt ist es ja gefixt. :)
phoo (2024-11-21 09:58:51+00:00): Hallo wielandb, vielen Dank für's erkennen und beheben. In der App ist das nicht aufgefallen.
stillhart (2025-05-30 13:38:36+00:00): fyi, electric car chargers can be split into the charger area and each point
one is amenity=charging_station, one is man_made=charge_point
But that's a new thing :-)
SekeRob (2024-11-12 11:19:20+00:00): Hi,

Unfortunately you've mapped a new tertiary road, node for node, on top of a previously existing service way. The proper way to map ways of a different class which were there before is to cut up the ways that need a different classing and change the tagging, so highway=service > tertiary. In short, you need to remove the tertiary ways you mapped on top of the existing ways and reclass the old to the new status. We do not delete old roads when they get up or downgraded and map a new one... that will result in the loss of now and way history.

Let me know if you need help.

cheers

PS: In case you dont read english, go to DeepL at https://www.deepl.com/en/translator#en/it/
Thanatos_05 (2024-11-13 19:57:04+00:00): I've just modified it, let me know if it's ok. Thank you for the reply
wolfy1339 (2024-11-05 21:40:00+00:00): Hello,
Can you please provide more detailed changeset comments instead of simply Quebec?

I see you have tagged numerous telephone exchanges (central offices) with the ref tag with the area code and CO code. While that may be relevant data to add, I don't believe it belongs in the ref tag.
The telecom industry uses CLLI codes <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CLLI_code> in order to reference exact sites and exact equipment.

You seem to have tagged some buildings with `communication=yes`, can you explain what that tag is?

You also seem to have added the `area=yes` tag to some buildings. That tag is not needed as buildings are considered areas by default.

Finally, you shouldn't add `Telus Quebec` to the name tag (except for the telecommunications office), it should instead be in the operator tag.
Dartmouthmapmaker (2024-11-06 19:57:46+00:00): OK found it thank you
conradoos (2024-12-27 21:57:15+00:00): Hi, you made edit with OSM Relatify. This tool duplicate ways, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1331122468, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1331123874, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1331122469, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1331123875 etc.
adamos (2025-01-06 14:25:25+00:00): Hi, thanks for the info. I already know about this bug, trying to pay extra attention to it
NieWnen (2024-11-15 22:25:01+00:00): Skąd informacje o jednokierunkowości ścieżek?

Przy okazji https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12316084437 tu brak połączenia.

Co do samej zmiany, to rozdzielanie na 2 linie jest nierekomendowane, a właśnie rekomendowane jest tagowanie 1 linią, więc lepiej było poprawić tagi, chyba że realnie dodali jakiś fizyczny nieprzekraczalny separator, to wtedy co innego.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w
user_717069 (2024-11-22 16:19:46+00:00): Jednokierunkowość wynika z oznakowania C-13 tylko w danym kierunku oraz szacunkowej szerokości, choć prawdę mówiąc ten twór wydaje się nie spełniać żadnych parametrów...
Brak połączenia naprawiony.
Wydaje mi się, że kiedyś rekomendacja była odwrotna, a mapowanie jedną linią dopuszczone jeśli nie jest się w stanie zmapować oddzielnie. Z resztą to byłoby zgodne z ogólną zasadą, żeby preferować styl zapewniający większą szczegółowość.
HeiKue (2024-12-14 16:45:34+00:00): Löschung merkwürdig.
Dieser Abschnitt steht unter Denkmalschutz D-5-6532-0559.
Siehe BayernAtlas.
Soll ich reverten?
ndg032 (2024-11-06 04:32:00+00:00): Hola serock, separe los andenes 2 y 5 porque el andén 5 todavía no esta inaugurado, no se si es algún error pero si lo llega a ser pone la etiqueta construction:railway=platform como lo hice con el otro andén, saludos
serock (2024-11-06 16:58:55+00:00): Hola ndg032, gracias por avisar, pensé que había revertido el cambio, pero no fue así.

Es que su modificación era un ejemplo justo para ver un error que marcar algunas herramientas de control de calidad sobre problemas en los datos de OpenStreetMap,  o bien lo marcan como "objeto superpuesto y/o duplicado" o que hay un conflicto en las etiquetas de "construction:railway=platform", en ambos caso no veo el error, para mi ambas cosas están bien, quizás sean "falsos positivos" de las herramientas usadas.

Ya revertir mi cambio, muchas gracias y saludos !!!
ndg032 (2024-11-06 20:11:52+00:00): Muchisimas gracias serock
ilias_ (2024-11-05 22:47:17+00:00): Hi! You made edits in Turkey, China and Portugal. Please try to split your edits as they cover half the earth. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
MarcoR (2024-11-07 09:18:24+00:00): Ciao!
Gli elementi geografici temporanei in genere non dovrebbero essere mappati su OpenStreetMap in quanto non facilmente verificabili (vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_practice#Non_mappare_eventi_e_caratteristiche_temporanee).

Inoltre, in particolare per i fiori, potrebbe essere consigliabile non mapparli per evitare che qualcuno possa sfruttare l'informazione e danneggiarli o raccoglierli in massa.

P.S. io qualche anno fa mappavo le aree dove fiorivano i bucaneve :)

Buon mapping,
Marco
eddym71 (2024-11-07 12:20:13+00:00): Grazie Marco, lo tolgo allora
MarcoR (2024-11-07 13:56:19+00:00): Sì, penso sia la scelta giusta, grazie.
kapazao (2024-11-06 21:44:00+00:00): Hola, veo que has mapeado tan solo usando imágenes del IGN y esto no es correcto, ya que debes revisar las imágenes por satélite más actuales para ver si esa información concuerda con la realidad.
Por favor revisa tus ediciones y siempre trata de contrastar la información de tus ediciones con varias fuentes.
Un saludo y gracias por tus contribuciones.
eggie (2024-11-05 21:45:17+00:00): Lijkt me oke.. Het is alleen jammer dat club=sport helaas nog niet rendert in Carto.
Sommigen lossen het op door buurthuis/clubhuis bij te taggen... mits de vlag de lading dekt.
.. amenity=community_centre 
Of... nog een keer leisure=sports_centre
Gr eggie
stu67 (2024-11-05 22:00:03+00:00): Merci! J'avais manqué une autre connexion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158796575
StC (2024-11-29 18:07:33+00:00): Avec plaisir ! De mon côté, ce sont les messages sur les changesets que je rate. Il faut que je change mes paramétrages de notification...
NeisBot (2024-11-05 21:30:38+00:00): Hi Rusticoluss, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 96% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 6 highway(s)
- 1 building(s)
- 1 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=158795723
woodpeck (2024-11-05 22:35:53+00:00): It appears that this changeset has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158796640
gpserror (2024-11-06 11:33:41+00:00): i cleaned up tagging of the multipolygon.  boundaries are used for political boundaries and usually extend very large areas, alas this is a mere golf course and there's standard tagging for golf courses.
Hypsometric (2024-11-07 02:24:09+00:00): Awesome! Thank you. I'll be looking back at your edit for reference when something like this comes up again. Much appreciated.
gpserror (2024-11-07 15:04:09+00:00): Incidentally it looks like the land to the north of the western piece appears to also be a golf course, and the current area looks kinda small (though I didn't count out 9 or 18 holes)... should this actually be bigger or is that an adjacent competing golf course?
gpserror (2024-11-07 15:12:27+00:00): I think it's https://www.facebook.com/p/Edgewater-Country-Club-100040275137233/ and should be a 9-hole course.  Appears to be (seasonally?) closed now?
Hypsometric (2024-11-10 13:41:08+00:00): Probably closed now/seasonal. Most golf courses close in Oct around there. Yes, 9-hole as well. I'll take a look at tags to update for adding some of that.
SekeRob repair (2024-11-07 13:35:25+00:00): FYI: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16002405 (6 'warnings da tua edit)

Happy mapping
Dodko (2024-11-13 14:43:06+00:00): Slovo ulica do názvu ulice nedávame.
https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/NEJlJhUbhWA/m/QZgF71ZpBwAJ
woodpeck (2024-11-05 22:36:56+00:00): It would be good style to leave comment on the changeset that you are reverting, so that its author gets alerted to the revert. I have done that for you now but please remember that for future reverts.
Xvtn (2024-11-06 18:35:21+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for your contributions!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-05 22:21:04+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12316363822

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2024-11-05 22:30:38+00:00): Hi Rusticoluss, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 building(s)
- 1 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=158797291
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-06 18:41:45+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158829460
jaimeMF (2024-11-05 23:14:33+00:00): No sé si  la etiqueta de landuse=plant_nursery es correcta en https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/181651091 , porque es un edificio.
Ivseg (2024-11-05 23:28:28+00:00): Buenas, tienes razón al ser un lugar cerrado y no al aire libre, igual greenhouse_horticulture se ajusta más a este caso?
jaimeMF (2024-11-05 23:38:26+00:00): ¿O mejor la etiqueta de edificio building=greenhouse? landuse=greenhouse_horticulture entiendo que sería para una zona que contiene invernaderos.
pbnoxious (2024-11-06 20:19:30+00:00): Hi, der Rettungspunkt ist bereits weiter nördlich eingetragen, wo anscheinend das Schild (fälschlicherweise) steht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9031206123

Wurde das mittlerweile an diese Stelle versetzt, so dass man den anderen Punkt löschen kann?
Kommandant Pommer (2024-11-10 20:13:24+00:00): Hallo,
vielen Dank für die Nachfrage. Der genannte Punkt ist auch im Web an genannter Stelle markiert.
DD1GJ (2024-11-24 07:52:37+00:00): Hallo Kommandant Pommer,

willkommen bei OSM. Danke fürs Mitmachen sowohl bei uns als auch bei der Feuerwehr.

Wie  pbnoxious bereits geschrieben hat, wurde das Schild vor Jahren vom Förster an der falschen Stelle montiert. Im September 2019 wurde die Bayerische Forstverwaltung über diesen Sachverhalt informiert.

Bei OSM verlassen wir uns insbesondere bei den Rettungspunkten nicht auf irgendwelche Angaben im Web, sondern schauen vor Ort nach und tragen das selbst Gesehene ein. So wurden auch schon verwechselt aufgestellte Schilder entdeckt. Zudem weisen Rettungskette Forst und BayernAtlas auf ihre Nutzungsbedingungen und Urheberrechte hin. Danach ist ist OSM ausdrücklich nicht gestattet, diese ohne Gewähr veröffentlichten Daten direkt zu übernehmen.

Es ist natürlich erlaubt, diese Datenquellen als Anregung für eigene Erkundungstouren zu nehmen und anschließend das selbst gesehene bei OSM einzutragen. Ich habe daher den von Dir fälschlicherweise als Sammelpunkt eingetragenen Rettungspunkt wieder gelöscht. Fahr bitte an beiden stellen vorbei und schau nach, ob der Förster zwischenzeitlich das Schild am richtigen Standort angebracht hat. Falls Ja, verschiebe bitte den vorhandenen OSM-Eintrag an die korrekte Stelle. Bitte nicht löschen und neu anlegen, da sonst die für die Qualitätskontrolle wichtige Versionshistorie verloren geht.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Demergency_access_point

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim

PS: Das mit dem Urheberrecht gilt u.U. auch für die Hydrantenpläne des Wasserversorgers, die er den Feuerwehren meistens nur zum dienstlichen Gebrauch überlässt.
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-06 14:32:37+00:00): Really not sure I understand the point of changing a cinema to a toilet.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158798061
literan (2024-11-06 17:24:58+00:00): а разве там во дворе стройка уже завершена? на гуглоснимках от сентября видна, и там здание строится...
NeisBot (2024-11-05 23:12:38+00:00): Hi Midland School, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 5 highway(s)
- 1 building(s)
- 1 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=158798266
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-06 18:40:37+00:00): Thank you for your private message and for confirming that the data was intentionally deleted.

However, I still hold a differing perspective. If the streets and buildings are visible in the aerial image, they should be represented in the OSM database.
Midland School (2024-11-06 18:58:12+00:00): I understand your perspective but if I can minimize someone using maps and roadways to plan out an attack on our school (which in today's world does happen), it is much harder to do that from an arial map than one that has all the roads and exits and buildings labeled.

Who makes the call on this type of decision. Open to conversation and a phone call if willing.

Thanks.
Glassman (2024-11-08 17:02:56+00:00): I have reverted the changeset and placed a 0 hour block on the user.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158798266
Midland School (2024-11-08 17:15:52+00:00): I would like to challenge this decision. Blocking a user to end the discussion seems a little harsh. Can we open up dialog, please?
Jordi MF (2024-11-05 23:37:42+00:00): Hola Dolores,

Gracias por mejorar OSM. Ten cuidado cuando añdas vías paa mapea pista o senderos. He visto que has añadido muchos senderos que, en realidad, son caminos agrícolas y por los que pueden circula vehículos. Si los mapeas como senderos (path), los navegadores no calcularán ninguna ruta por aquí para los vehículos. Si hay marcas de ruedas, mapea las vías como "track".

Gracias.
woodpeck (2024-11-06 16:57:12+00:00): Please explain your reasoning for creating a bay named "Sea_PE". Is that a name commonly used by the local population, as in "hey, Sea_PE looks funny today"?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-05 23:38:29+00:00): 158760790 
158760817 
158760838 
158760860 
158760874 
158760896 
158760934 
158760962 
158760973 
158761004 
158761038 
158761092 
158761157 
158761178 
158788776 
158788911 
158789142 
158797906 
158798061 
158798087 
158798128
lakedistrict (2024-11-05 23:48:44+00:00): Might actually be better as a node as I think the pharmacy is only on the ground floor, with student flats above.
gurglypipe (2024-11-06 11:25:51+00:00): Good point, done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158813895 ta
OSM_GEO_Validator (2025-09-11 16:22:55+00:00): Hi Buddy,

Are you sure about existence & connectivity of way 1331152593 and construction of way 1331152599 ??

Car and trucks are visible in https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=385237891257679.
OSM_GEO_Validator (2025-09-11 16:23:37+00:00): Hola amigo,

¿Estás seguro de la existencia y la conexión de la vía 1331152593 y de la construcción de la vía 1331152599?

Los automóviles y camiones son visibles en https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=385237891257679.
woodpeck (2024-11-06 22:45:34+00:00): Dear pahlavi_temecula, please put a meaningful description in your "changeset comment" field. You seem to have been using "Added them" for every single edit you made - that does not make sense. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for details.
pahlavi_temecula (2025-03-08 03:23:32+00:00): Hello, just finally got this messages thing working. It’s something with my client saving stuff. Rather just have a simple “added them” message, until now which I’ll do. Thank you.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-11-06 11:06:00+00:00): Les arrêts à cet endroit on bien été retirés par la ville?
mdgm (2024-11-06 12:48:10+00:00): Oui, les arrêts qui étaient à l'intersection Rivard-Rhône ont été déplacés à Rivard-Rimbaud.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-11-06 13:57:46+00:00): Ok, parfait, merci!
AMAMOR (2025-11-30 20:15:45+00:00): Limite contendo erros traçado em área sensível e conflituosa.
Os pontos (nós) do mapa não são equivalentes às coordenadas do anexo II da lei.  Por exemplo o ponto 8819071889 está muito distante ao vértice A108 da lei.
LucFreitas (2025-11-30 21:07:32+00:00): Os limites foram desenhados de forma aproximada a partir de imagem publicada pela PMVV à época da implantação do MONA, conforme descrito na etiqueta fixme. Sinta-se à vontade para realizar as correções de acordo com os pontos georreferenciados oficiais.
ZeLonewolf (2024-11-26 03:20:52+00:00): Hey, I'm thinking all these mountain bike trails should be tagged highway=path + bicycle=yes based on:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking

highway=cycleway is more for traditional bike paths.  What do you think?
osmhonehone (2024-11-26 23:18:56+00:00): Hello,

I think it is a somewhat controversial (and not by any means new) topic with decent arguments to be made on both sides:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Duck_tagging

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-April/051864.html

- I did not create these specific trails as cycleways. I have been just trying to update and clean stuff up after actually riding them recently. They definitely are dedicated, designed-for-MTB singletracks, not some random passages in the forest not forbidding access by bikes.

- Most MTB areas in Kentucky I am familiar with use cycleway (and I have added some trails this way).

- I am not particularly fond of how generic highway=path is, but would not feel about it strongly enough to revert if someone made a consistent cycleway->path change everywhere :-).

Cheers!
bxl-forever (2024-11-06 02:22:24+00:00): Hello, Lemmery,

Despite your changeset title claims that you edited roads in Kazakhstan, you also made several edits around New York (redrawing a sidewalk, redrawing a house entirely, moving landuse areas…).

It is strongly advised to upload such changes separately; this will also make it easier for you to provide more accurate descriptions of your changes upon uploading.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Happy mapping.