piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JeroenvanderGun (2026-06-16 10:45:42+00:00): The northern entrance is indeed blocked by a non-movable permanent guard rail, visible in Mapillary: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13541764771

The south entrance is in Mapillary only blocked by temporary roadwork beacons, but maybe it has been more permanently closed off as well.

Surprisingly, this switchover is not even shown in KernGis, unlike the other ones, so I guess it has been retired permanently in favour of the ones further west: https://geo.rijkswaterstaat.nl/arcgis/rest/services/GDR/kerngis_droog/FeatureServer
rajdhani (2026-06-18 04:11:39+00:00): Hi JeroenvanderGun, 
thank you for your comments and for taking the time to validate the edit. 

Based on street-level imagery dated May 31, south end is only blocked with beacons whereas north end is blocked with guardrails, as you confirm as well. 
So if there’s no suggestion to manage the situation otherwise, I think the disused:* prefix is OK to keep here.
NKDTL (2026-06-13 21:21:07+00:00): Na całej długości estakady jest teraz pozostawiona prędkość terenu zabudowanego (zdjęte podniesienie do 70 km/h), a widzę że prędkość została w niektórych miejscach 30km/h i 70 km/h.
HurricaneGator (2026-06-16 20:10:50+00:00): Hello Alvarado2510! 

I noticed in this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184017285 you added destination=Campo Alegre;La Palma;David Sur and destination:ref=1 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1274235860. I wasn’t able to find a viewport for that angle in Mapillary from May, 11 2024 (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=832664368708917). Would you be willing to share the source you used for this update? If you have access to more recent ground-level imagery or photos, would you be willing to upload them to an OSM-compatible platform such as Mapillary or KartaView (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street-level_imagery_services)? That would allow other contributors to verify and reference the signage as well. The OSM wiki states that destination key “is only for values which are explicitly indicated on signposts or ground writings.” as seen in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination#Value. I’m happy to help make these adjustments, but wanted to ensure you are aware of the OSM Wiki guidance on destination tagging.
Senihtu (2026-06-13 13:42:02+00:00): Hi!
mit diesem Änderungssatz hast Du 4 Wege in die Superroute "Jakobsweg via Baltica" eingefügt.
In eine superroute gehören nur Relationen.
Kann es sein, das diese Wege eigentlich in die Relation  "Jakobsweg via Baltica, Schleswig-Holstein West" (2096447) gehören?
Ist das eine Wegesänderung oder eine Alternative?
Gruß
Senihtu
rfid4711 (2026-06-13 14:04:25+00:00): Hallo,
ich bin letzte Tag den Weg um die Kirche gegangen und habe gesehen, das die heruntergeladenen Daten über die Bundesstraße führen. Mir ist nicht aufgefallen, das ein "zweite" Relation exitiert. Das kann (muss) geändert werden.
Gruß rfid4711
Senihtu (2026-06-13 14:51:47+00:00): ok. der Wanderweg geht also um die Kirche und nicht über die B 432? 
Habs geändert (und das Problem mit der Superroute behoben).
Änderungssatz: 184059455
Gruß
Senihtu
rfid4711 (2026-06-13 16:08:59+00:00): Super, Danke!
Gruß
rfid4711
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-06-13 11:43:41+00:00): Ce bâtiment est maintenant un supermarché PA? Il faudrait mettre à jour. Ou bien c'est une erreur?
literan (2026-06-13 09:53:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28573158

есть building=clinic https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/building=clinic

заменю
robryk (2026-06-23 21:24:46+00:00): Hallo,

ich vermute, dass du dich hier verirrt habe: so weit ich mich erinnere, diese Ampel haben das Züri-standardmässiges vibrierendes Blindesignal und kein akustiches. Bist du anderer Meinung?

Falls wir einig sind, dass das irrtumlich ist: Ich habe viele solche irrtumlich markierte Ampeln in Zürich gefunden, so wäre es gut solche Fehlern auszuschliessen durch eine Verbesserung in StreetComplete. Deshalb würde ich dankbar, wenn du beschriebst, was dein Denkprozess beim Ausfüllen war und was denkst du würde für dich dabei hilfsreich.

Mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Robert
robryk (2026-06-23 21:30:28+00:00): Hi,

it seems to me that this is in error. TTBOMK these traffic lights have the Zurich-standard vibrating signal for the blind and no acoustic signal.

Assuming you agree with me: I've found many traffic lights in Zürich labelled (IMO incorrectly) as having sound signals via StreetComplete, so I would hope that we can make some change to how the question is presented in StreetComplete to make such errors less likely. Could you describe your thought process when answering this question and maybe suggest what would have made it clearer what answer to give?

Cheers,
Robert
robryk (2026-06-23 21:30:52+00:00): Sorry, I mixed up tabs. Ignore the repeat of my message.
d_berger (2026-06-23 23:39:37+00:00): Nein, es stimmt schon, die Fussgängerampel im Süden hat keinen Aktustiksender, nur den zugelassenen Vibra. Das ist das Resultat der ständigen SC-Abfrageseuche und gehört in Zürich unterdrückt.
robryk (2026-06-24 08:40:17+00:00): Doch: in diesem Changeset hat Marcel "traffic_signals:sound=yes" zugefügt, der du schon korrigiert hast.
improperaffo (2026-06-12 14:54:59+00:00): can you explain the removal of the transit platform?
d_berger (2026-06-13 12:16:57+00:00): Duplication of the existing platform (n11878748019). We don't duplicate elements. And no, it's not a requirement to map a platform as way, a node is sufficient. Neither is it encouraged to change existing elements from pattern A (node) to pattern B (way). HTH
9_tab (2026-06-13 12:45:01+00:00): @d_berger so why do you convert from way to node? 

Who is "we" in your comment? It appears that local editors disagree with you.
improperaffo (2026-06-15 06:53:27+00:00): it seems to me that other bus 1/701 stops in the area are mapped using a platform. Why not removing the point point and keeping the platform? It seems more consistent to me
d_berger (2026-06-28 21:49:09+00:00): Triggered by recent automated changes, I updated the southern MBC lines by hand and reviewed all stops. While I'd prefer more photos (found at least a newspaper article), I opted to update all recently re-built BehiG/LHand-platforms from node to way. Not as general case to make it "look consistent," but to map and tag consistent, based on physical properties. This said: some "transit platforms" are now nodes, because there are no physical features besides a pole. Sorry for the irritation, there's a long history with long-standing mappers that mass reverted whole areas, so I'm never a fan of changes based on 'I've seen it otherwise mapped.'
lolloandre (2026-06-12 14:35:51+00:00): Altra fonte: https://tg24.sky.it/cronaca/2026/04/03/maltempo-abruzzo-molise-uomo-disperso-news
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-25 08:26:41+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and other mistagging for POI in changeset 184571277

https://osm.org/changeset/184571277
mapl (2026-06-26 11:05:59+00:00): Changeset ist insgesamt gut. Ich hab die Öffnungszeit nur noch der gebräuchlichen Syntax entsprechend angepasst. Ich vermute "Mo-Fr [...]; Th [...]" könnte so interpretiert werden, dass die hintere Donnerstag-Angabe die Mo-Fr-Angabe komplett überschreibt, anstatt mit OR verknüpft zu werden.
mapl (2026-06-26 11:09:06+00:00): Nachtrag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#:~:text=Each%20ruleset%20is%20evaluated%20in%20order,previous%20rulesets.
ist die relevante Aussage hierzu
BCNorwich (2026-06-15 06:25:30+00:00): These new highways duplicate existing highways, thus disrupting routing. I've reverted the changes. Please amend/correct the existing highways.
yelisey90 (2026-06-14 07:46:29+00:00): masts, not towers, I assume?
evgenykatyshev (2026-06-14 17:58:21+00:00): There isn't power=mast, only =tower or catenary_mast. It seems like it former power line, so tower
yelisey90 (2026-06-14 21:23:29+00:00): mmm then it should be power=tower, not man_made=tower
evgenykatyshev (2026-06-15 04:44:53+00:00): Oops. I'll fix it
Sylabowy Kot (2026-06-12 15:24:40+00:00): OSM nie jest miejscem na reklamy. Google jest niedozwolonym źródłem danych dla OSM. 
W związku z tym zestaw zmian został wycofany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184022165
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-30 06:55:17+00:00): The user, an apparent SEO account, re-added back most of the removed tags in changeset 184064046 without prior discussion.

https://osm.org/changeset/184064046

Therefore, I reverted this in changeset 184836994 , as well as reported them for further action due to their extensive history of SEO spam changesets containing advertising, malformed tags and copying from Google Maps.

https://osm.org/changeset/184836994
MarcoR (2026-06-13 20:40:50+00:00): Ciao e benvenuti su OpenStreetMap!

Il fatto che vi sia un presidio NoTav non va indicato nel nodo place che riguarda la località . 
A proposito di quest'ultima: il nome "Borgata Mulini" è indicato su qualche cartello o è utilizzato dai locali? 
E invece il valore che hai rimosso (Clarea)? Era proprio sbagliato o potrebbe essere un valido nome alternativo per questo insediamento?

Nel caso si potrebbe usare alt_name=*

Buon mapping,
Marco
Rivolta_radicale (2026-06-14 09:40:04+00:00): ok, al punto 1 non lo sapevo, passando di lì per la ferrata ci sono varie bandiere ma non sapevo dove mettere questo dettaglio. Clarea è la zona, la borgata si chiama proprio Borgata Mulini per le macine della canapa che c'erano dall'800' fino a 2 anni fa
Rivolta_radicale (2026-06-14 09:41:27+00:00): io non so dove mettere il dettaglio del presidio. avevo visto sulla mappa quello di venaus scritto, se sai come modificarlo fai pure
giopera (2026-06-14 11:00:47+00:00): Gentile.

Per caso ha a disposizioni foto e simili del luogo e del presidio?
Alternativamente ci sa dire come è composto il presidio così da trovare la miglior soluzione possibile per il tagging?
In particolare si interessa sapere se sono presenti tende, caravan, se sono in uso gli edifici e simili informazioni.
MarcoR (2026-06-16 21:07:32+00:00): OK,
ho rimosso il presidio dal place e l'ho aggiunto al nuovo node/13946303323

Eventuali modifiche sono ben accette! ^_^"
Giuliani Deon Sanches (2026-06-12 15:23:22+00:00): How do I delete this edit?  I did it by mistake
zuicz (2026-06-17 15:04:54+00:00): w relacjach przystanków miejsca zatrzymania https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1886344661 to stop
a perony https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13931506669 to platform
FajrAl (2026-06-12 15:34:38+00:00): Mohon beri penjelasan mengenai penghapusan jalan
literan (2026-06-13 09:43:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13931099073 а это не супермаркет?
empty_child (2026-06-13 10:25:33+00:00): Неа
https://mediahub.x5.ru/news/perekryostok-otkryl-kafe-select-v-parke-gorkogo
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-06-12 18:45:57+00:00): Hey, real quick comment:
First, thanks for adding this to the map. Second, if it's still under construction, you can tag the ways with highway=construction + construction=* instead of leaving a disconnected road network. Thanks again!
Also, you misformatted the URL. It should be this instead: https://maps.clarkcountynv.gov/ow/?@772860,26706076,7
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-13 22:57:26+00:00): Hi. Think you may have had a bit of a copy / paste hiccup there!
BholeKiBhasam (2026-06-14 14:43:07+00:00): g'day, may be summer humid caused that, can you please pin point it...all i see is wide map...may be you are pointing towards elevation that i picked up from caltopo...please point out...i might get back
BholeKiBhasam (2026-06-14 14:46:04+00:00): may be you are pointing towards the abandoned or seasonal shepherd or cattle herders shelter....
BholeKiBhasam (2026-06-14 16:01:17+00:00): or may be the changesheet notes, comments, i guess
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-14 21:26:36+00:00): Have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1528814144 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1528818174
BholeKiBhasam (2026-06-15 06:06:28+00:00): thank you, I was cross referencing on some other data source so ended up copy pasting...corrected now....thanks again..have a good day and if you notice any more of such, please do let me know, will help me improve my attention during long mapping sessions,
Glassman (2026-06-14 00:15:12+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184023374
Jrachi (2026-06-13 08:27:06+00:00): Attento a quando modifichi una relazione!
Non ho capito esattamente come ma l'ordine dei membri è stato confuso.
iD non ha avvisato che stavi modificando una relazione?
Hai verificato cosa è cambiato nella relazione?

Ciao
f_gonella (2026-06-24 14:58:58+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che hai già corretto tu. grazie ;)
TheSwavu (2026-06-15 23:04:12+00:00): Hello,

I've reverted this changeset and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184025691.

There were a number of problems:

1. Highways can't cross other highways without a connecting node. iD would have warned about these before you uploaded your changes.

2. Turning lanes are not mapped as separate ways unless they are physically separated. 

3. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5109298 can be fixed with a turn restriction r20987303.

Happy mapping.
silversurfer83 (2026-06-14 12:58:55+00:00): Moin Jonas :)

du hast jetzt Details, die an den shop gehören (Öffnungszeiten, shop=supermarket) auch an das building=* getaggt. Warum?

Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184024479
Glassman (2026-06-14 00:18:49+00:00): #TIP: We don''t use descriptive names. Best bet would be to outline the house, and tag it as building=house. Also, Home implies personal information which isn't appropriate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184024863
Natfoot (2026-06-12 19:22:06+00:00): you may also set it to building=razed
so people won't add it again.
AskManav (2026-07-16 07:49:47+00:00): It is in very bad shape. Better to keep it as a standalone regional or lcoal trail.
Szymson (2026-06-13 08:56:38+00:00): :/
Marek-M (2026-06-13 09:43:49+00:00): Nie wiem co masz na myśli, bo przecież 2 wysepki o długości 3 metrów nie tworzą fizycznego podziału na kilkadziesiąt metrów. Po co tworzyć fikcję?
Marine Sakurae (2026-07-03 08:51:50+00:00): Dear jack walker2,
I sincerely apologize for my incorrect tagging of the former township centers.
Although there have been no government-appointed offices in these areas since 2000, the central villages of these former townships still remain important local centers in daily life, comparable in significance to the seats of existing townships. For that reason, three years ago I tagged them as township-level place features, using names without the “镇”, in order to make them more visible on the map.
I now realize that this was a rather frivolous and unscientific approach. 
Some of my older relatives came from these former townships in Zhuanghe, so I truly appreciate your concern and contribution to the accurate labelling of the map around Zhuanghe City.
Note: I would sincerely suggest deleting 南尖村 (10921972932), because the former seat of 南尖（镇） was 兴隆村, which has already been mapped. The administrative village named 南尖村 is located elsewhere, so the current mapping appears to be duplicated.The same problem also exists in 尖山村 (10921972931) and 三架山村 (10921972933).As for 高岭村 (9366598386), there is currently no administrative village by that name, so it might be best to delete it altogether.
Best regards,
eggie (2026-06-15 10:18:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Tomas09 (2026-06-12 17:37:43+00:00): source=It's pretty obvious that a garden isnt a big chunk of concrete
Sanniu (2026-06-16 06:10:23+00:00): Hi
Are these stairs run in parallel to footpath? Or replace part of it (it is impossible to move on wheelchair)?
dima monsky (2026-06-16 10:47:41+00:00): Hi Sanniu, i think i added... twice, the same stairs but... can see footpath only, cannot see added stairs. Don't know what to do, strange, never met such situation, please, can You help? Stange, never
Sanniu (2026-06-16 10:51:55+00:00): Hi, they overlap... I can untangle it in ID, but I should know is there only stairs or also footpath?
dima monsky (2026-06-16 12:25:29+00:00): Thank You! I will continue a bit footpath, will be better also to check at real place, there are another stairs close to playground to add. Here are problematic added by me stairs http://wikimapia.org/#lang=en&lat=32.624573&lon=35.324118&z=22&m=w&show=/43543777/Stairs/photo/9695429
Sanniu (2026-06-16 14:21:30+00:00): Fixed according to picture, hope it is right layout
dima monsky (2026-06-16 15:46:44+00:00): Thank You! Seems i am doing something wrong. Added other steps inside along footpath - again, clicking can not see steps can see footpath only(
Sanniu (2026-06-17 13:53:06+00:00): you should angle the steps/footpath to make it run in parallel.
To fix in ID (in-site editor) you can double click on the duplicate way to create point and when unjoin it - then you can drag steps out of footway
dima monsky (2026-06-17 16:22:03+00:00): Thank You are helping me, i am learning osm newbie)
czubi (2026-06-13 11:11:50+00:00): Ich denke du hast die Häuser verwechselt. Nr. 280 ist rechts daneben, oder?
pwbriggs (2026-06-17 00:05:12+00:00): Thanks. Just a word of caution, make sure you don't map things incorrectly in order to satiate the validator. Osmose and other tools have lots of false positives, and they don't understand context in the way humans can.

Happy mapping :)
ion_chi (2026-06-15 16:50:32+00:00): Hi cstromw,
Google earth, street view, and imagery are prohibited sources for OSM
cstromw (2026-06-15 16:53:54+00:00): Sorry, didn’t realize! I am mainly relying on my own local knowledge for these updates, I will stop listing google products then.
Adam Haba (2026-06-12 18:07:05+00:00): *piktogramu
BCNorwich (2026-06-14 06:00:51+00:00): Hi, OSM is a live worldwide database from which a huge number of maps are compiled.

You are welcome to add genuine features to OpenStreetMap, but please don't add fiction. I've removed Way: Lanhydrock Pokémon Mega Evolution TCG Trail (1528854549) as it is fiction, it duplicates existing highways, and causes disruption to routing. 

Regards Bernard.
vojtechzaboril (2026-07-01 09:03:50+00:00): Dobrý den,
z jakého zdroje máte informaci, že se silnice I/3 změnila na II/603? Mám pocit, že jsem toto s vámi již řešil, je opravdu tak těžké uvést zdroje změny do changesetu? Takto se to jeví jen jako ničím nepodložená změna od stolu.
Prosím tedy o informaci kde je tato změna číslování uvedena (Mapy.com nejsou relevantním zdrojem). V opačném případě budu nucen provést revert.
vojtechzaboril (2026-07-01 09:05:22+00:00): "uprava chyb" opravdu není vhodným komentářem. Pokud je změna číslování někde zveřejněna, stačí uvést třeba "I/3 -> II/603 (viz odkaz)" nebo tak něco.
felipeeugenio (2026-06-12 21:19:06+00:00): Hola. por favor no pegar los landuses a las calles.
Por favor ver como está mapeado el resto.

saludos
felipeeugenio (2026-06-12 21:21:26+00:00): Además, las etapas numeradas de una urbanización son un tema más de la inmobiliaria que las entrega que el cómo se nombran los barrios. Hay que tener cuidado con eso, a veces hay excepciones, Pero hay que evaluarlo.
rarad74 (2026-06-14 07:40:24+00:00): Salut. Te rog ca pe viitor sa pui explicatii mai inteligibile, nu asa ca pentru tine.
Multumim.
felipeeugenio (2026-06-12 21:14:36+00:00): Hola Raúl. Gracias por tus ediciones, es información muy valiosa. Pero estás mezclando conceptos:

Los condominios no son barrios, hay que marcarlos como landuse=residential + name=

Y además estás nombrando areas residenciales completas con nombres de condominios que evidentemente son mas pequeños que el área que marcaste.

Voy a intentar arreglar lo que hiciste, pero por favor hacerlo con más calma.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184030421
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-13 01:49:58+00:00): Reverted SEO spam POI with advertising/nonsensical tags added with explicit source=* of Google Maps in violation of OSM policy and potentially copyright and contract law, in changeset 184038058

https://osm.org/changeset/184038058
gpserror (2026-06-30 03:10:01+00:00): I think you got the speed limit right in a previous changeset but this one looks broken.  Going to revert it.
Rush1967 (2026-06-30 12:07:16+00:00): Is there an easier way than having to select all the tiny little sections on the map to provide these updates?  I am new to performing these updates.
gpserror (2026-07-01 10:48:04+00:00): That is a mystery to me too, I've been manually selecting the pieces...Don't blame you this is tough I think.
Lieckio (2026-06-12 23:44:13+00:00): Instead of removing them out of principle _when they provide information_, see the typical well mapped parks elsewhere in the world. Berlin parks are a good place to check as well.

Or - go and mark individual trees yourself. Right now you are removing useful information in lieue of getting to a outdated wiki practice.

See - for example - Großer Tiergarten in Berlin or Kensington Gardens in London.

Feel free to replace with more accurate information, rather than remove.
Sakari_N (2026-06-13 06:24:53+00:00): They provide information - just the wrong one! I have also noticed that the same mistake has been repeated in some other parks, Stephen' Green in Dublin is the best one because drone image of the park is in the leisure=park article explaining how it is not a forest.

Meaning of the tags is defined in the wiki and you can open a proposal to change the meaning of the tag if you want.

However, if you want to draw an area like this, you can ATYL! Or someone has already done that, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landcover%3Dtrees and I can revert my change and mark them as leafcover if you want.

I also added some of the trees in Marianpuisto, and also added the leaf type. If you have surveyed the trees you could add the genus too.
Sakari_N (2026-06-13 07:20:47+00:00): And for your examples about Tiergarten and Kensington, Tiergarten actually has a lot of forest parts in it (forest according to definition of natural=wood or landuse=forest) so that's correct. Kensinton is definitely incorrect, but most of those forests are mapped 9+ years ago and never changed. So I think it's not the wiki that is outdated practice...

And if you check Keskuspuisto in Helsinki, you will see that it is largely mapped as natural=wood because it is a forest.
Sharko_MV3 (2026-06-13 12:17:07+00:00): ...what the hell happened?


Also please add a tl;dr for the love of god...
AskManav (2026-07-16 07:48:31+00:00): Bhandardara Traverse route updated:
1. From Ghattan Devi Mandir to Kulang the Hivlyachi Daar is unfortunately being converted into a road now. New trail (ghatvaats) are added west of the crestline (Jamunde - Ladhewadi - Ghattan Devi Temple) and Parvyachi daar is added to avoid road sections.

2. From Bari all the way to South of Pabargad is mostly road section. To avoid road one can loop around East and South of Kalsubai and then stay North of AMK to further reduce road section between Udadhavane and Kanarwadi.

3. The Sindola ridgeline approach trail is no more in use as told by shepherds of Devichiwadi.

4. The Shipnur Dongar trail is in very bad condition. It is better as a separate regional trail or a side trail. 

5. Bail Ghat is another route but my recommendation is not to add that path to any hiking route as it is in very bad shape.
dreiblum (2026-06-15 18:48:51+00:00): Hallo warum hast Du die die alten Anschlußgleise der Gußfabrik gelöscht? Diese habe ich heute noch gesehen. z.B. way414624335
felipeeugenio (2026-06-12 22:19:05+00:00): Hola Raúl. Acabo de corregir básicamente todo lo que tocó. Hay condominios además, con nombres incorrectos.

por favor incorporarse al chat de la comunidad en el link que le fue enviado por correo para aclarar dudas- Estamos para ayudarlo. En ese chat puede recibir mejor instrucción.


saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184031822