piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
sgalaxya71silver (2023-04-16 10:27:28+00:00): در مورد تقاطع ملت (عالی قاپو) علت این که از کلمه تقاطع استفاده نمودام این است که کلمه عام می‌باشد و هم چهارراه و هم سه راه را پوشش می‌دهد شاید بیان کنید در تابلوای که شهرداری نصب نموده نوشته شده [چهارراه ملت (عالی قاپو) ]  ولی این تابلو را متاسفانه شهرداری اصلاح ننموده است این تابلو زمانی که نصب شده بود مسیر ماشین رو خیابان شیخ صفی و بلوار سعدی به هم وصل بودنند ولی بعد از اجرای طرح این مسیر ماشین رو تبدیل به پیاده راه شد و عملا این چهارراه یکی از راه‌های شریانی خود را از دست داد شما می‌دانید که نمی‌توان به یک سه راهی  چهارراه گفت ولی اگر تابلو شهرداری را در نظر بگیریم فرمایش جنابعالی صحیح است در نهایت اگر قائل بر این هستید که بر اساس تابلو ها نام گذاری شود ولو اینکه غلط باشند به روی چشم اصلاح می‌نمایم
ChehrehBargi (2023-04-21 00:36:26+00:00): باسلام و سپاس از توضیحات شما
خود بنده هم در چند سال ابتدایی ثبت و ویرایش osm مواردی که عرف بود رو اضافه میکردم. اما بسیاری از ویرایشهام رو ویرایشگران دیگر با استناد به ویکی osm تغییر دادند. هر موردی که ثبت میکنین و براش زحمت میکشین اگر با توجه به قوانین ویکی باشه هیچ کس نمیتونه تغییر بده. توضیحاتم برای شما هم در همین راستا هست تا ویرایشهایی دقیق تر داشته باشید، در واقع شما با مطالعه ویکی، کارتون مرجع خواهد شد.
یا حق
rarad74 (2023-04-12 05:09:41+00:00): Salut. Te rog sa folosești diacritice la nume.  Softurile text to speech folosite la navigații îți vor citi exact  cum ai scris numele și va suna foarte urât fără diacritice. Multumim.
dcapillae (2023-04-12 00:33:31+00:00): Buenos días.

Este conjunto de cambios fue revertido.

La etiqueta «old_name» debe reservarse para el nombre antiguo en español (idioma local), si lo hubiera. El nombre fenicio ya está recogido en el etiquetado actual.

En su cambio ha eliminado la etiqueta «wikipedia=*». La etiqueta es correcta, luego debería mantenerse.

El nombre oficial de la ciudad de Málaga es «Málaga». La ciudad no tiene otro nombre.

La etiqueta «wikidata=*» debe corresponder con el artículo relativo a Málaga en la Wikipedia.

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
dcapillae (2023-04-12 00:29:14+00:00): Buenos días.

Este conjunto de cambios fue revertido.

La etiqueta «old_name» debe reservarse para el nombre antiguo en español (idioma local), si lo hubiera. El nombre fenicio ya está recogido en el etiquetado actual.

En su cambio ha eliminado la etiqueta «wikipedia=*». La etiqueta es correcta, luego debería mantenerse.

El nombre oficial de la ciudad de Málaga es «Málaga». La ciudad no tiene otro nombre.

La etiqueta «wikidata=*» debe corresponder con el artículo relativo a Málaga en la Wikipedia.

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
dcapillae (2023-04-12 00:33:03+00:00): Corrección: Este conjunto de cambios no ha sido revertido. Se revirtió uno anterior (error mío, lo siento): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134793898
Lostmonkey (2023-04-18 11:33:22+00:00): Hvorfor oprette Letz Sushi som dublet?
Trevor_1 (2023-04-16 15:33:52+00:00): Hello. The place tag "city" here on Open Street Map is only used for the largest cities within a state, such as Detroit, Lansing, and Grand Rapids. Lapeer would be better classified as a "town".
mrhercli89 (2023-04-16 17:13:56+00:00): So the actual jurisdictional status that a municipality has is irrelevant? Then, I guess the next question is: what determines 'largest cities in a state?' Is it top 10, 20? Do they need to meet a pre-determined population threshold?
Trevor_1 (2023-04-22 17:07:43+00:00): The actual jurisdictional status is irrelevant. The largest cities should usually have at least 50,000 people, but if it's in a more remote area, it can be less. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aplace%3Dcity
mrhercli89 (2023-04-22 18:26:45+00:00): Reading through that help section, there seems to be a lot of discretion given, with no hard and fast ‘rules’. It even states that these things can vary significantly from country to country. In my mind, we should be following the laws of the state and/or country that you are mapping in.
Trevor_1 (2023-04-22 18:32:29+00:00): That's not how we do it on OSM. If you classify every place that is technically considered a "city" with the tag "place=city", there would be way too many. Only the largest cities should show up when you zoom out.
mrhercli89 (2023-04-22 19:09:29+00:00): Ok - if that's how it's done, for consistency's sake - I need a set of clearly defined rules. As I mentioned originally, 'largest cities' is very open-ended. As also varies significantly from state to state. Are the 'largest cities' incorporated cities? Does that also include townships? Can it not include suburbs? Who defines whether said place is considered a suburb or not? If Lapeer - being the largest city in Lapeer County - isn't going to be considered a city - then what does? We need population perimeters, geographic perimeters, etc. in order to determine the correct classification, given OSM's lack of a clear definition.
user_5359 (2023-04-12 10:22:02+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/15710989. What is the mean of the tag 市役所前 = 市役所前?
okadatsuneo_import (2023-04-12 13:37:54+00:00): Hello!
Thank you for your comment.
I have fixed my wrong tagging.
clay_c (2023-04-20 19:15:03+00:00): Hi MetalCascade,

It appears you merged the railway=junction at CP 424 with a railway=switch. This made a single node tagged railway=switch;junction which isn't recognized by OpenRailwayMap or any other renderers, causing it to disappear from the map.

Generally, we don't merge timetable points with individual features like signals and switches. I went ahead and undid this one for you: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135164650
RailandSea (2023-04-20 20:08:56+00:00): Oh I see I was trying to centre it within the interlocking. I’ll fix that on the others. I keep that in mind between the two websites.
MxxCon (2023-04-14 01:51:03+00:00): Do you know the name of this physiotherapist?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134795177
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-06 05:49:04+00:00): Apparent unauthorised source (copyright)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140877497
VictorIE (2024-04-04 19:08:29+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1161562698/history

Several buildings with building:levels=methylcellulose langzeitwirkung darm
pittrichimica (2024-04-05 19:43:45+00:00): O o, C&P problem. Thanks, corrected.
gscscnd (2023-04-12 09:10:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134803698
Trochę przerobiłem, może będzie dostatecznie dobrze. Umieszczanie adresu w punkcie drzwi też jest jakimś rozwiązaniem, ale jeśli nie jest to konieczne, to lepiej by było na budynku.
user_5359 (2023-04-12 05:30:33+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/10803387733. What is the mean of the tag conn = way 1161561223,node 10803387732,node 10803387733?
Fauzan IRM-ED (2023-04-12 06:10:07+00:00): Hi user_5359, The tag conn=way appeared automatically after I merged the road. I just removed the tag. Thanks for your correction.
watmildon (2023-04-14 04:38:15+00:00): Hello! Welcome to OpenStreetMap. This change looks good. If you'd like to improve it even more this section of roadway seems to have been missed for speed limits and lanes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6352692/history#map=19/47.76216/-122.30766). 

For houses I like to draw the roofline as accurately as possible and make sure to remember you can square the corners with by selecting the outline and hitting 'q'. Tree cover around here can make aerial imagery hard to map from so you're free to use your own knowledge of local buildings to make sure they look nice a crisp.

I've drawn a few more around this one so it isn't all alone ha.
Jacorp (2023-07-28 00:01:06+00:00): Hey what the heck, why was the proposed Blue Line extension deleted? I put a lot of work into that. I understand that there is a part of the route that hasn't been finalized yet (assuming that's why it was deleted) but you didn't have to delete the whole thing. It will probably be finalized soon, so hopefully there is a way to recover all of that easily.
Jacorp (2023-07-28 00:34:15+00:00): Meant to add the last comment to changeset 134796569 instead.
zbrown4 (2023-07-28 02:10:35+00:00): Hey - prior to removing these ways I asked other local mappers for their opinion regarding 'proposed' ways. The general consensus was that 'highway/railway=proposed' ways are not appropriate for OSM as they are not verifiable on the ground, and as you mentioned, the route is subject to change. The 'proposed' value itself is a disputed subject on OSM (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:proposed#Verifiable? and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dproposed)

Once construction starts, it would be valid to add the ways as railway=construction.

If you disagree, you are welcome to join the OpenStreetMap Slack #local-minnesota channel and voice your opinion. This changeset (and/or 134796569) can be reverted if there is agreement with others.
Diógenes de Sinope (2023-04-19 15:45:03+00:00): Olá Defz,

Nomeou um nó neste conjunto de alterações com o que só posso presumir é uma abreviatura: Colégio 'LAD'

Usando abreviaturas é contra as directrizes do wiki OpenStreetMap.

[ https://wiki-openstreetmap-org.translate.goog/wiki/Abbreviations?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=pt&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp ]
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
Diógenes de Sinope (2023-04-19 15:48:00+00:00): Olá Defz,

Ao rever as alterações feitas ao mapa de Luanda, este conjunto de alterações destacou-se para mim em particular.

Certamente que toda a área que designou como o campo 'Cruz Linda' não pode ser o campo em si baseado nas características do terreno que podem ser vistas através de imagens de satélite, deve refinar a designação para a área específica que realmente representa o campo.
StellanL (2023-11-06 01:41:10+00:00): This seems to be contrary to the entry for busway: "The following features may allow access for buses while restricting other forms of traffic, but they should not be tagged with highway=busway: "  item "Bus-only service roads - short service road that leads away from the main carriageway to a bus system administration, operations facility (e.g., bus terminal, bus garage, etc.). "
clay_c (2023-11-06 02:05:04+00:00): The Transbay Terminal is a passenger bus station, not an employees-only garage as in the example given. This roadway has high importance to bus passengers and prohibits all other traffic, which should qualify for highway=busway.
numbs (2023-04-30 05:32:14+00:00): I have reverted this changeset. See (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134753039#map=13/47.4667/-122.2801) for details.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135524031
mueschel (2023-04-16 10:55:13+00:00): Hi,
is 'railway:etms' really correct, or should it be 'railway:etcs'?
RailandSea (2023-04-16 12:29:05+00:00): That’s correct, CSX uses Interoperable Electronic Train Management System (I-ETMS) for their railroad PTC system and has ACSES II Equipped engines to be on foreign railroads.
eggie (2023-04-12 05:31:02+00:00): Hi Schnilz..
One feature one element. The parking is not the camperplace... Just a part of it.
I think it's better to create a seperate part of the parking as camperplace.
Greetz
eggie
wusatosi (2023-04-12 03:29:02+00:00): Based on two published material by DDA (downtown development authority) as well as personal survey:
1. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/15cWvMZe03kStX3i5YhrPgShTkqlv1WTN/edit#slide=id.p11
2. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1I3qGPb0lK2zTqhDNyYI6B4P__xbQLl0z/edit#slide=id.p12
DaveTO (2023-04-25 20:40:32+00:00): Yes, the road is bikeable, but that is not a good reason to set bicycle=yes. That tag indicates that bicycles are legally allowed to ride on a particular way, not whether or not the incline or surface are suitable for them.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Dyes for more details.

For this reason I suggest reverting these changesets where the (legal) access tags of paths have been used based on personal preference of what is and isn't bikeable.
Supaplex (2023-04-12 06:41:32+00:00): Hi,
Could you split the changeset to much smaller part, and please do not included those disrupted area
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134797339
mtmail (2023-04-27 12:28:53+00:00): Can you correct the position of this restaurant? It was added in country Belgium, Europe, in the middle of a street.
ElliottPlack (2023-04-12 13:48:16+00:00): Hi CurlingMan, Elliott from the Data Working Group here. I’d ask that you stop doing this deletion of these abandoned railroads. Users that are interested in them are complaining about your removal. That data may not be useful to you but it is useful to someone.

The data working group asks that you refrain from deleting abandoned railroads (such as in this change set or others).

Thank you,  

Elliott Plack  
OSMF Data Working Group  
Ticket#2023040710000267  
Contact me at data@openstreetmap.org with any questions and reference the ticket number above.
RussNelson (2023-04-16 02:20:25+00:00): He is continuing the practice of deleting abandoned railroads: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134926999
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-16 02:46:09+00:00): Understood.  Are we able to map "razed" and "abandoned" roadways and buildings?  I would find them especially useful in knowing how the roadways and buildings have changed over time and how they have adjusted.

I give up on trying to update railways for what actually exists on the ground.  If railway mappers want to keep outdated and long-gone features, that's fine.  I would think that having a map that only has what is actually on the ground would be important.  I apologize for trying to update outdated features to bring the map up to date to represent what is truly on the ground where no railways crossings exist across freeways and through people's living rooms.

I digress.  I will not edit railways going forwards, and apologize.
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-16 02:53:54+00:00): While our opinions may disagree and the community may disagree on what should and should not be mapped, it isn't something that the two of us have been able to work out, and likely will never work out.  The community needs to work it out.  And I recognize that.

It is actually surprising that the community still has not decided on what the "best practice" is for mapping or not mapping long removed railways and railway crossing.  Especially ones intersecting houses and other modern buildings, often times incorrectly snapped to roadways and power poles.

That being said, I am done with the railways, will leave them untouched, regardless of their actual status.
ElliottPlack (2023-04-16 02:58:09+00:00): Thanks for understanding. Yes, if I understand correctly, you are free to map those abandoned railroads right on buildings or roadways although some mappers don't like it if you put a highway and railway tag on the same way.

I feel your pain on this issue and truly appreciate your dedication (with the hashtag #CloseTheNotes.) There are times when I've deleted abandoned railroads that are totally and completely gone in all senses (the lines were just there for someone to remember where they were went.) In that case, I think there is a case for deleting them, and Russ is free to disagree with me here (good forum topic) but if someone like him actually surveyed the old trackbed and found evidence somehow in a building footprint or whatever, then I'd leave that one. You can always comment on the original changeset and see if the user would be amenable to a compromise. No one is right 100% of the time.

Kindly,  
Elliott
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-16 03:14:22+00:00): And to clarify the question at hand, what about the short, specific segments that have been over-built and replaced by a building or roadway.  These features require excavation and there generally is no trace through a large flat parking lot or through someone's bedroom.  Specifically, what if the only way to verify anything was ever there is to use a metal detector and ground penetrating radar?

Short of breaking out the high-tech, what is good enough to consider proof?  A suspicious discoloration of crops in farmland where the land is level and the field has been plowed?
Nick The King (2023-11-17 08:17:59+00:00): Lmaooooo. What a bunch of misanthropes. It’s not that big of a deal! Imagine playing Pokémon Go and you see some random railway feature on top of your house… What nonsense. Why in the world would you dedicate your life to mapping out non existent features.
emersonveenstra (2023-04-12 12:14:36+00:00): Hi,

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222821829 you added cycleway=shared_lane and cycleway:both=no. Could you please go back and remove the incorrect one? Thanks!
wusatosi (2023-04-12 20:00:11+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out, fixed in 134835098
user_8655426 (2023-04-12 10:33:18+00:00): Hello,
You deleted some volcanoes or changed their tags, did you read the OSM Wiki?

Tag:natural=volcano
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dvolcano

I'll revert some of your changesets later. (#134798457, #134798345, #134798225, #134798188)

Also, the survey points on the Japan GSI Standard Map are not necessarily peaks. Please be careful when editing peaks. (peak = the highest point)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134798345
user_8655426 (2023-04-12 10:33:37+00:00): Hello,
You deleted some volcanoes or changed their tags, did you read the OSM Wiki?

Tag:natural=volcano
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dvolcano

I'll revert some of your changesets later. (#134798457, #134798345, #134798225, #134798188)

Also, the survey points on the Japan GSI Standard Map are not necessarily peaks. Please be careful when editing peaks. (peak = the highest point)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134798345
rhhs (2024-07-30 17:18:12+00:00): I changed the smoothness of the road from Govedartsi to Malyovitsa from "horrible" to "intermediate". I was in Govedartsi this morning so I could see that inside the village, there were no potholes. Looking at Bing Streetside imagery, this seems to be the case for the rest of the road too. Maybe your user feedback called it ужасно but it doesn't need a "heavy duty off road vehicle" to drive it ;)
Supaplex (2023-04-12 08:42:53+00:00): IS there a local Name?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134798547
tanzwiese (2023-04-12 09:38:01+00:00): Not that I'm aware of and neither am I able to type it if there were
tanzwiese (2023-04-12 12:28:36+00:00): Fixed in on the laptop
Benoît C MdP (2023-04-13 07:11:48+00:00): Bonjour Evan,

Merci pour ta contribution. J'ai une interrogation. Pourquoi avoir modifié les tags de la bande cyclable de la rue Belgrand pour des tags équivalents mais moins précis ? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/163070533

Bonne continuation

Benoît
Jrachi (2023-04-12 06:42:08+00:00): Ciao.
Mi dici quale importanza "storica" abbiano gli edifici in rovina di Laval?
Langlaeufer (2023-04-12 09:10:01+00:00): Hallo Nortix,
ich wäre Vorsichtig mit access=yes auf Wegen weil es Zugang für alle Verkehrsarten bedeutet. Ist es hier wirklich notwendig?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134799306
Nortix08 (2023-04-12 15:29:02+00:00): Hallo Langläufer, Danke für den Hinweis. Wie wäre es korrekt zu zeigen, das diese Eolltreppe nur zu Fuß genutzt werden darf? foot=yes?
Langlaeufer (2023-04-12 17:41:47+00:00): Treppe / Rolltreppe / Fußweg sind per default (bereits/nur) foot=yes
Langlaeufer (2023-04-12 17:42:18+00:00): bzw. sogar foot=designated (für Fußgänger vorgesehen)
Nortix08 (2023-04-13 07:52:52+00:00): Habe ich geändert.
user_5359 (2023-04-12 09:30:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM!
Branko Kokanovic (2023-05-04 10:43:26+00:00): E, vidim da si ovde ispravljao adm. granicu naselja. Jeste cudno iskrivljena, ali probaj da je ne diras, zato sto je to doslo iz RGZ-a. Imam dnevni izvestaj koji gleda sta je promenjeno, pa sam tako primetio:)
Zenfiric (2023-05-04 12:27:09+00:00): Nije mi to bila namera. Mora da je bila neka taćka spojena sa admin. granicom, pa je zato u izmenama
eggie (2023-05-12 08:47:44+00:00): Hoi...  De bedrijfsinfo heb ik overgezet naar de adresnode.
Probeer als het kan steeds de adresnodes te gebruiken. 

MVG
eggie
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
numbs (2023-04-30 05:32:15+00:00): I have reverted this changeset. See (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134753039#map=13/47.4667/-122.2801) for details.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135524031
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-12 06:30:22+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640094550
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640094568
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640094584
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640096365
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640096742
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640096764
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640096785
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640096807
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097008
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097025
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097043
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097060
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097074
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097087
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097112
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097127
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097212
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097232
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097246
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097259
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097267
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097272
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097282
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097289
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097299
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097320
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097329
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097334
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097341
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097359
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097374
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097511
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097523
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097528
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097550
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097572
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097637
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097709
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097712
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097726
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097934
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640097974
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9126070931

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀