piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
2bosm (2025-02-12 10:27:44+00:00): gehwege, die begleitend zu straßen verliefen gelöscht da es im tagging der straßen hinterlegt ist
pitfire (2025-02-12 12:24:45+00:00): Hi  tczolitron,
das stimmt in diesem Fall nicht.
Du hast den begleitenden Bürgersteig zwar gelöscht, aber der Larstraße nichts davon gesagt. 
Das Ende von "Weg: 305823335" ist kein Überweg, sondern nur ein Knoten wo Radfahrer wieder vom gemeinsamen Rad/Fußweg auf den Hitzbroicher Weg müssen. 
Für die Teilstrecke "Weg: 305823335" fehlt noch ein "segregated"

VG pitfire
mendines (2026-01-28 20:09:39+00:00): 안녕하세요,

공용도로를 highway=residential과 highway=service로 태그한 건에 관해서 말씀드립니다. highway=residential은 주택가 골목 등 차량의 통행보다 주거지 진출입이 주 목적인 도로에 사용됩니다. 단순히 아파트 단지 진출입로와 연결되었다는 이유로 이 태그를 사용하면 곤란합니다. 동탄오산로, 동탄대로19길 등은 차선이 많고 대로 사이를 연결하고 있어 차량 통행을 우선하는 도로이기 때문에 highway=secondary 혹은 highway=tertiary 등이 적절합니다.
highway=service는 아파트 단지 내, 주차장 등 반드시 특정 시설 안에만 (혹은 그 진출입로로) 있어야 하며 도로명이 부여된 공도에는 적절한 태그가 아닙니다.

후에 도로 매핑하실 때 참고하시기 바랍니다. 감사합니다.
Mathias_ADAV (2025-03-05 13:30:39+00:00): Bonjour Thomas, je viens de voir ta modification, c'était un double cyclable avec bande, donc je rajoute cycleway:left + cycleway:left:oneway = -1 
@+ !
bartgron (2025-03-17 21:15:23+00:00): Jeśli nie jest to oficjalna nazwa, a jedynie używana lokalnie nazwa, to dajemy ją nie do name tylko do loc_name
LordGarySugar (2025-06-10 19:41:05+00:00): Removed, fictional mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167461081
Makeena (2025-02-16 15:27:49+00:00): hi horst, danke für deine Hilfe. Hast du eine Quelle für diesen Namen? Gibt es vor Ort eine Tafel? Ich konnte online so schnell keinen Hinweis finden. Und gibt es einen Grund, dass der dritte Teich nicht auch dazugehört? Vielen Dank für die Klärung. LG
herr_horst22 (2025-05-21 18:36:20+00:00): Ich erhielt die Information direkt von der Stadt Zürich. Ich habe in deren Auftrag eine Wandertour für eine Routingapp geplant und in der Beschreibung war von Drei Weiher die Reder. Daher bin ich davon ausgegangen, dass die auch so heißen. Der dritte Teich gehört natürlich dazu. Ich weiß allerdings nicht, wie ich den dritten Teich hinzufügen soll.
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-17 10:41:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162605674, 162605678, 162605680 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from YaaRamis after several requests for respectful changeset comments were ignored
mueschel (2025-02-12 18:44:58+00:00): Hi,
could you check this way without valid tags?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359041111#map=16/39.43509/-31.20944
Silva1989 (2025-02-12 20:50:04+00:00): Hi mueschel. Thanks a lot for pointing this out.
The line was a stub and was mistrakenly added by pasting twice.
I'v fixed the issue though changeset 162444922. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162444922
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-17 10:41:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162605674, 162605678, 162605680 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from YaaRamis after several requests for respectful changeset comments were ignored
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-17 10:41:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162605674, 162605678, 162605680 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from YaaRamis after several requests for respectful changeset comments were ignored
eggie (2025-02-11 13:21:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   foot=yes hoeft niet op een highway=footway Dat is default. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-02-11 13:27:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM.

I don't think this is somewhere in India?
Please stick to the project!
.. and it is not a water=pond.

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2025-02-11 13:29:19+00:00): reverted by changeset #162391385
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-11 13:21:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12578923098

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Przecicinek (2025-03-26 14:40:24+00:00): Kolego, czemu droga jednokierunkowa? Tu są normalnie pasy w każdym kierunku.
adrianautomat (2025-03-26 18:18:21+00:00): Tam przy rondzie byl znak ZAKAZ WJAZDU. Raz jechalem tam pierwszy raz na nawigacji google i kazala tam zjechac i musialem sie cofac do ronda przy Maku zeby wjechac na ta droge 😉
adrianautomat (2025-03-26 18:33:03+00:00): Przy okazji pytanko wiesz moze czemu TOMTOM ostatnio rzadzko sprawdza Raporty z MAPSHARE? TOMTOM niby ma jakas wspolprace z OPENSTREET gdzies czytalem?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-11 13:30:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1344983086

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
DD1GJ (2025-02-11 19:43:47+00:00): Revert 162392545 162391348 162391304, Tests von User wolli1971 mit erheblichen Schäden
eggie (2025-02-11 13:33:53+00:00): Hoi
Je vraagt feedback   Dit zijn geen parkeerterreinen.
Ik heb het aangepast naar parking=street_side 
orientation=perpendicular
Zie
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2025-02-11 13:36:14+00:00): Feedback: Dit is oke.
Gr eggie
DD1GJ (2025-02-11 19:44:05+00:00): Revert 162392545 162391348 162391304, Tests von User wolli1971 mit erheblichen Schäden
Eebie (2025-02-15 20:27:45+00:00): Er is iets misgegaan. De parking is gewijzigd in een toilet en in een gebouw. En op de parking staat er nog een toilet. Kan je dat zelf corrigeren?
eggie (2025-02-11 14:06:29+00:00): Welcome OSM Please stick to the project.  You are damaging the map!
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162391657

Greetz
eggie
eggie (2025-02-11 14:10:13+00:00): reverted due to vandalism by changeset #162392887
eggie (2025-02-11 14:07:24+00:00): Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits. 
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen. 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
eggie (2025-02-11 14:08:57+00:00): reverted due to vandalism by changese #162392837
urbalazs (2025-02-11 14:53:35+00:00): Ezt nem fordítva kellett volna? Azaz a kapcsolatra a teljes old_name előzményt, és az egyes tagokra csak a legutolsó régi nevet vagy csak a jelenlegi elnevezést?
BáthoryPéter (2025-02-11 14:56:56+00:00): A Bartók egy elég speciális eset, azért is akartam vele kezdeni. A Körtér két oldalán eltérő volt a neve.
DD1GJ (2025-02-11 19:42:56+00:00): Revert 162392545 162391348 162391304, Tests von User wolli1971 mit erheblichen Schäden
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-11 14:21:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/381828960

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-02-11 14:25:36+00:00): Dag Fekoly,

Alleen een name= doet niets in OSM Geef ook de aard van het bedrijf aan.
Bv office=company
MVG
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-17 10:41:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162605674, 162605678, 162605680 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from YaaRamis after several requests for respectful changeset comments were ignored
infeeeee (2025-02-20 20:44:06+00:00): Tereknél nem lenne jobb ezeket place=square ként megrajzolni inkább? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aplace%3Dsquare

Mert ez így a térnek csak egy részét tartalmazza.  Tavaknál se csinálunk relációt, hanem poligon, ha folyó reláció analógiáját követjük.

Ugyanez igaz a Gellért térre, ami már ráadásul szerepelt így és linkelve volt wikidatához: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114812515
Fraxi (2025-02-11 17:57:49+00:00): Използвани изображения и от Esri Clarity
Frank Peng (2025-12-12 03:28:05+00:00): Hello TransAct-AS, I noticed that you deleted Liberty Drive (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18666891) in this changeset. As far as I can tell, it is visible in the 2024 Esri World Imagery, and I can clearly see it (it's an unpaved road). What is the source for this deletion?
Frank Peng (2025-12-12 03:35:52+00:00): Hello TransAct-AS, I noticed that you deleted Liberty Drive (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18666891). As far as I can tell, it is visible in 2019 Bing imagery, 2024 Esri imagery, and other aerial imageries, and I can clearly see it (it's an unpaved road). What is the source for this deletion?
Frank Peng (2025-12-12 03:37:05+00:00): Hello TransAct-AS, I noticed that you deleted Liberty Drive (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18666891) in this changeset. As far as I can tell, it is visible in 2019 Bing imagery, 2024 Esri imagery, and other aerial imageries, and I can clearly see it (it's an unpaved road). What is the source for this deletion?
Frank Peng (2025-12-17 15:31:42+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176055918
Tomas09 (2025-02-11 19:54:42+00:00): Wat exact betekent weg mutaties? Is er iets mis met de tag, hoe het pad gaat, iets met een relation? Of zijn er hekken die niet perfect staan? Veel detail hoeft niet maar het is wel fijn om wat meer er over te weten als iemand ooit naar de changeset kijkt. (:
Lyon-St-Clair (2025-02-14 16:40:58+00:00): Dont delete F1 track variants please !!!
KarlaIbrahić (2025-02-12 08:20:57+00:00): Reverted because node was created. #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162419282
Maxplus (2025-02-11 14:34:46+00:00): Ok
MKnight (2025-02-11 17:08:00+00:00): Moin, Du hast hier eine bauliche Trennung eingebaut wo offenbar keine ist.

Ich habe das rückgängig gemacht in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162399637
Yunan973 (2025-03-04 14:52:34+00:00): j'ai supprimé le nom allée des Alamandas que tu avais mis par erreur sur le pourtour de la zone résidentielle de Matoury https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384988042

Je n'ai pas vérifié tes autres modifications de ce changeset, je ne sais pas si tu as mis ce nom sur d'autres éléments, je t'encourage à tout vérifier.
tguen (2025-02-20 23:47:03+00:00): reverted; the hotel is not signed as "Courtyard by Marriott Portland City Center"
Fraxi (2025-02-11 17:57:59+00:00): Използвани изображения и от Esri Clarity
BCNorwich (2025-02-12 07:32:41+00:00): Hi, Thanks for trying to help but adding fiction does not help. With the 14 highway warnings given above you have disrupted routing here. Thus I've reverted your changes.

Regards Bernard.
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-17 10:41:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162605674, 162605678, 162605680 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from YaaRamis after several requests for respectful changeset comments were ignored
somehundred (2025-02-11 15:40:19+00:00): Abās šajā izmaiņu kopā izveidotajās relācijās biedru lomas ir saliktas otrādāk. Šajos gadījumos "inner" vajag pārvērst
uz "outer" un "outer" uz "inner".

Jāņem vērā, ka multipoligona ārējai līnijai vienmēr jābūt "outer" lomā un elementam, kas ir iekšā, jābūt "inner" lomā.

Šajā[1] relācijā šai[2] līnijai jābūt "outer" nevis "inner" lomā. Un pārējiem diviem biedriem[3][4] jābūt "inner" nevis "outer" lomā. Tāpat arī otrā izveidotajā relācijā.


[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18690530
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359072008
[3] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216737542
[4] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359072009
HellMap (2025-02-11 18:29:02+00:00): Piebildīšu arī, ka šeit zāle nav visur pareizi iezīmēta, jo tā ar tiltiem dzīvē nesavienojas vienā līmenī (savienojas tikai tilta sākumā) un daudzviet turpinās zem tiltiem. Līdzīgi kā ap https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207408882 . 

Lūgums arī Bing nobīdi pielabot pirms zīmēt, citādi pēc tam ļoti daudz pa jaunu jābīda.
Mister_R2 (2025-02-11 18:59:40+00:00): Jap piedod, sajaucu.

Es jau biju pieminējis vienā note - https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4526040

Neviens nenokomentēja, pieņēmu, ka atbilde bija nē. Pārskatīšu pēdējos rediģējumus saistītus ar Bing, un pārvietošu, ja vajadzīgs.
HellMap (2025-02-11 19:15:21+00:00): Vienīgais (cik zinu), kas par Bingu apspriests, ir Zulipā tēma. Pārējais tikai daži komentāri konkrēti changesetiem, kur atgādināts par Binga nobīdi. To note es personīgi pat nebiju pamanījis. Cik pa mēnešiem esmu skatījies, jaunais Bings pa visu Rīgu ir ar līdzīgu nobīdi - kaut kur ap -1, -0.7. Tā kā principā tas attiecas uz visu Rīgu vairāk vai mazāk vienādi. Un Binga nobīde principā jau ir visā Latvijā, bet tas jau tā ir kopš Binga iesākumiem. Mums vēl daudz ceļu laukos sazīmēti ar 10+ metru nobīdi no senseniem Bingiem. But I digress...
somehundred (2025-02-12 14:47:57+00:00): Es salaboju biedru lomas šajās relācijās: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162433199

Izmaiņu vēsturē gan neparādīsies.
dankarran (2025-02-12 19:19:02+00:00): Thanks for adding the detail :)
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-17 10:41:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162605674, 162605678, 162605680 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from YaaRamis after several requests for respectful changeset comments were ignored
Yog Sot (2025-02-11 20:17:08+00:00): a mógłbys bardziej precyzyjnie? ;d
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6341933722
Papryk_00 (2025-02-11 21:41:41+00:00): Mógłbym, o ile wiedziałbym co to są za drzewa :/
neuhausr (2025-02-11 16:01:28+00:00): Thanks for adding to the map! I'd suggest you look at the wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:house=terraced. house=terraced should be used if you're tracing each townhome unit separately. building=terrace would be used for the whole building if you're not getting that detailed. If you're going the latter route, it might make sense to use a point to tag each address where the entrance is. Hope this helps, happy mapping!
Tatfahren (2025-02-11 18:48:01+00:00): Wurden die Geschäfte zu Wohnraum umgebaut oder abgerissen?

Ansonsten sollte "disused:shop=*" für "leerstehendes Geschäft" verwendet werden. 

Dadurch fragen einige Editoren regelmäßig nach, ob dort ein neues Geschäft eingezogen ist, und es sind Auswertungen zum Leerstand in Städten möglich.
Tatfahren (2025-02-11 18:50:19+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:*
TI-Profi (2025-02-12 08:59:36+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Das Geschäft steht leer bzw. zieht bald ein anderes Geschäft oä. dort ein.
Supaplex (2025-02-13 08:46:57+00:00): Hi Trần Tất Sung

We received a report that said you still did not provide a meaningful description when uploading your change. Please be aware about the issue and response to other mappers' requests.

Xin chào Trần Tất Sung

Chúng tôi đã nhận được báo cáo cho biết bạn vẫn chưa cung cấp mô tả có ý nghĩa khi tải lên thay đổi của mình. Vui lòng lưu ý về vấn đề này và phản hồi cho các yêu cầu khác.


Dennis Raylin Chen
Data Working Group
data@osmfoundation.org
[Ticket#2025012410000432]
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162395672
Trần Tất Sung (2025-02-14 14:45:48+00:00): Cảm ơn bạn đã thảo luận về vấn đề này !

Đây là những thay đổi về 1 số nút giao tại tuyến cao tốc mà tôi đã chỉnh sửa tại khu vực này !
Xin cảm ơn !
citrula (2025-02-13 06:56:22+00:00): Is this not part of SH 154?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162395726
user_21759646 (2025-02-11 23:26:13+00:00): Zerknij: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4344925
Nachof (2025-02-11 15:39:13+00:00): Además de la fuente marcada en el cambio (http://visualizador.imcanelones.gub.uy/), los vecinos de la zona consultados coinciden en que la calle no cambió de nombre al este de Paraguay.
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-17 10:41:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162605674, 162605678, 162605680 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from YaaRamis after several requests for respectful changeset comments were ignored
detective-fiasco (2025-02-11 15:39:08+00:00): *Stanice Plzeň Valcha
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-02-11 19:26:43+00:00): Moin!

Innerhalb von Walsrode sind die Radwege an der Verdener Str. nicht benutzungspflichtig ("Sonstige Radwege"). 

Ich korrigiere das.

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
OpenStreetBoy (2025-02-12 07:55:36+00:00): Ok, dann paßt aber auf den begleitenden Fuß/Radwegen links/rechts das bicycle=designated nicht und muß auf bicycle=yes geändert werden. Am besten dazu noch traffic_sign=no, damit klar ist, das sich hier jmd schonmal korrekt befaßt hat.
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-02-12 09:28:11+00:00): bicycle=designated passt schon. Hat nichts mit Benutzungspflicht zu tun. Ich weiß,  dass nach das nach dem Lübecker Schema mit yes getaggt wird, aber das ist die Minderheit.

Bei traffic_sign stimme ich Dir zu. Das versuche ich inzwischen auch nach und nach hinzuzufügen.

Schwierig sind so Stellen mit widersprüchlichen Beschilderungen. Wie hier das 240 in Gegenrichtung.
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-06-23 21:48:12+00:00): Was mir gerade noch aufgefallen ist: Bei einem Gehweg mit "Rad frei" (Zeichen 239+1022-10) ist bicycle=use_sidepath nicht richtig. Ein Gehweg mit Rad frei ist nicht benutzungspflichtig (und zudem auch noch nur Schrittgeschwindigkeit erlaubt). Der ADFC rät daher auch von der Nutzung solcher Gehweg mit dem Rad ab!
OpenStreetBoy (2025-06-24 07:59:49+00:00): Stimmt. Das habe ich (normalerweise) so in meinen Workflow integriert.
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-06-24 08:06:33+00:00): Dann war das wohl nur ein Versehen an der Großen Schneede im A27-Park. Hatte dann auch gesehen, dass der erste Abschnitt ab Kreisverkehr mit 240 beschildert ist. Der Rest ist dann 239 mit Rad frei. Habe es jedenfalls korrigiert.
OpenStreetBoy (2025-06-24 09:55:48+00:00): Danke!
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-17 10:41:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162605674, 162605678, 162605680 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from YaaRamis after several requests for respectful changeset comments were ignored
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-17 10:41:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162605674, 162605678, 162605680 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from YaaRamis after several requests for respectful changeset comments were ignored
berndw (2025-02-11 15:59:50+00:00): source ist falsch, habe anstelle von ESRI die NRW-Bilder verwendet, survey ist auch schon länger her ;-)
joost schouppe (2025-03-18 13:06:04+00:00): ook op node/8719896988 de wayside shrine hersteld
BCNorwich (2025-02-12 07:44:21+00:00): I've made many corrections to your mapping. These are not motorways. Please take time to learn how to map properly, there are many guides. When uploading take heed of any warnings, 28 are given above for these changes.

Thank You.
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-17 10:41:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162605674, 162605678, 162605680 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from YaaRamis after several requests for respectful changeset comments were ignored
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-17 10:41:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162605674, 162605678, 162605680 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from YaaRamis after several requests for respectful changeset comments were ignored
colt04 (2026-04-19 06:20:22+00:00): there are both flock and non-flock license plate readers at the same time. San Carlos seems using both across the city.
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-17 10:41:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162605674, 162605678, 162605680 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from YaaRamis after several requests for respectful changeset comments were ignored
JeroenHoek (2025-02-11 19:49:22+00:00): This building contains a church, but it almost certainly wasn't built as a church. For the building-tag, the building's original purpose and appearance counts, not its function.

If there is a congregation here, use amenity=place_of_worship.

By the way, did you read the message that accompanied your ban? Could you take some time to participate in this discussion?

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/blind-qa-edits-tagging-qa-revert/125483/

It would be nice to hear from you that you understand the issue at hand there.
Flynn_ (2025-02-11 22:07:14+00:00): Hello,
I've fixed the building tag. Sorry about the issue with the tag qa. The technicalities of OSM like tags are more than a little beyond me. In retrospect, I clearly shouldn't have gotten involved in stuff I don't understand. I never wanted to damage the map or waste anyone's time. From now on, I'll stick to easier things like adding buildings and doing StreetComplete. Sorry again and thank you for your time :)
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-17 10:41:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162605674, 162605678, 162605680 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from YaaRamis after several requests for respectful changeset comments were ignored
Barroszt (2025-02-17 21:51:22+00:00): Ścieżka z nazwą "Ścieżka dydaktyczna"?
P_kawa (2025-02-19 17:52:04+00:00): Tak, ścieżka faktycznie nosi nazwę "Ścieżka dydaktyczna", ponieważ przechodzi wśród modeli dinozaurów i pełni funkcję edukacyjną. Taka nazwa tej ścieżki jest na stronie parku. Jeśli są jakieś wytyczne, które sugerują, że tego typu obiektów nie powinno się nazywać w ten sposób, chętnie zapoznam się z nimi.
neuhausr (2025-02-14 19:48:46+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding to the map! One thing I noticed is that you're sometimes "gluing" areas to adjacent road ways. It's suggested to not do that and leave a gap for a variety of reasons, such as that it's not that accurate, and makes future editing more difficult. (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Areas_and_Ways_Sharing_Nodes) I get how it might seem "right" at first, though! Happy mapping!
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-11 17:02:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779620623
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779615821
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779615801
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536995002
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536995003

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MidwestHikerDude (2025-02-13 03:09:16+00:00): The Aquatic Trail is an official Water Trail that is part of Lake of the Ozarks State Park.
Here is the map:
https://mostateparks.com/sites/mostateparks/files/trail_maps/lakeozark_aquatic_0.pdf
jcsanford (2025-02-13 03:21:21+00:00): Well I learned something new today. Thanks for that clarification. The name seemed generic enough that it could have been a random person's GPS track from an outing. Maybe it should be renamed "Lake of the Ozarks State Park Aquatic Trail" to indicate there is some authoritative source here?
MidwestHikerDude (2025-02-13 03:44:16+00:00): Renaming it makes sense. Adding a link to the map with a website tag would be helpful too. I can remake the trail if you like, and are unable to revert the change.
jcsanford (2025-02-13 14:55:53+00:00): I could be missing something obvious but I don't see a way to revert my change. I'm really sorry if you have to go and recreate this. Is there anything else I can do to revert this change?
MidwestHikerDude (2025-02-15 01:46:53+00:00): It looks like my message didn't send here earlier. I sent you a separate personal message with details about how to revert the change.
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-17 10:41:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162605674, 162605678, 162605680 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from YaaRamis after several requests for respectful changeset comments were ignored
Jose Luis Infante (2025-02-11 19:15:19+00:00): Gracias por tu aportación. Recuerda que hay que incluir el tipo de vía en el nombre (calle, avenida, paseo, etc).
Además, revisa tu edición porque has duplicado una de las vías.
¡Un saludo!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162398560