piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
maxbe (2023-03-04 12:18:00+00:00): Servus Toni,
ich habs nur gelesen und dann auf der Brücke nachgesehn, ob Autos drüberfahren, Bus war keiner dabei. Ich schau mal die nächsten Tag, wo die Busse herkommen. Denk aber, dass die dauerhaft jetzt wieder die alte Strecke fahren, an den Brücken hier ändert sich nichts mehr.
Grüße, Max
maxbe (2023-03-07 21:36:57+00:00): Hab heute einen 263 in freier Wildbahn beobachten können. Der nahm die neue Brücke zwischen Saturnstr. und Hausen.
tux67 (2023-03-04 12:11:15+00:00): Hi ActiveNotion,

ich nehme an du nutzt kein Omand Live - sonst hättest du sicher gesehen, daß der Baumarkt bereits eingetragen ist. Wäre nett, wenn du deinen Node wieder löschen könntest, um dem anderen User die Credits für den Eintrag zu lassen ;-)

MfG
tux67
tux67 (2023-03-06 10:55:14+00:00): Hab das Duplikat wieder rausgenommen.
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-24 16:34:57+00:00): Please refrain from including advertising copy when adding items to OpenStreetMap.  OSM is not an appropriate venue for that.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133285653
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
javbw (2023-04-17 00:54:26+00:00): 利根川橋 is badly mapped.  

Do not map bridges like this. 

- bridge area is one polygon for two bridges. 
- bridge area doesn't cover the whole bridge areas
- bridge has no bridge=yes  tag
-bridge doesn't share nodes with the roads over it. 

I will repair the bridge area. do not map bridges like this in the future, and refer to the wiki for how to map them.
Frans S (2023-03-08 12:09:00+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133285771
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Grinbert 🙂 (2023-03-04 11:34:55+00:00): Ich bin heute mit dem Zug vorbeigefahren und hatte ein Video gemacht.
emersonveenstra (2023-03-04 21:01:58+00:00): ??

Very clearly a legitimate business that just didn't know how to use iD. I'm reverting this and fixing up the tags. You can't say there's not 'any valid tag' when there's a valid website, name, address, phone number, and a tag describing what it is
emersonveenstra (2023-03-04 21:03:51+00:00): Reverted for vandalism in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133306235
mueschel (2023-03-04 21:16:09+00:00): Hi,
yes, the data may be of a legitimate business, but these entries are made by some SEO company they hired. There are about ~ 10 of these nodes each day, across the world, all with the same tagging, same spelling mistakes. Creating new user accounts for this without stating their SEO identity is clearly in violation of the OSM rules. 

If it were mistakes by innocent users, I'd be happy to correct them - but these nodes are clear cases of misuse of OSM.
emersonveenstra (2023-03-04 21:25:17+00:00): Deleting valid data because you don't like that a company added it is also clearly in violation of the OSM rules.

That was verifiably a real business, the node was in the right place, all the data was there, just the tags were wrong, so that's not 'misuse'.
mueschel (2023-03-04 22:30:37+00:00): It is clearly against the organised editing guidelines. They explicitly forbid hiding behind many new accounts and not revealing their occupation.
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
bxl-forever (2023-03-04 17:15:09+00:00): Hello,

Welcome to OSM!

I see you added a tree.

Pardon my curiosity but was this a test edit?  Unless it was planted in the last days, to the best of my knowledge there is no tree in front of number 5 here, as this picture shows:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=417348296481940

OSM relies a lot on peer reviewing and accountability.  If something is not obvious to observers—for instance if a change is very recent—it is always a good idea to explain this in the description, when uploading.

Looking forward to your reply.
bxl-forever (2023-03-14 21:07:09+00:00): I surveyed it tonight.  There is no tree here.  There is a tree elsewhere on the street, which is already on the map.

Your change has been reverted.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Jrachi (2023-03-05 07:30:09+00:00): Ciao.
Se capisco bene, oltre al resto, hai aggiunto un ponte.
Ma, hai lasciato il tag incline e un punte in salita è un poco strano, e hai messo highway=road mentre il resto, prima e dopo il ponte è highway=track.
Infine la larghezza di 2 m è decisamente poco per essere una strada generica o agricola, tracktype=grade1 suggerisce che possa essere percorsa da qualunque veicolo.
Ivo, Jrachi
Meinrad Samuel (2023-03-06 22:13:30+00:00): Hi Jrachi
Thank you for your sharp eye! I adjusted it!
Best, Meinrad
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Kiana_Kaslana (2023-03-04 15:56:13+00:00): changeset描述戳啦 并没有分离广泸高速道路关系嗷（
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
DoctorSpeck (2023-03-06 00:10:05+00:00): Hi, I noticed your tagging around the Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, always good to have folks improving the map.

You mapped a road passing under an elevated walkway as layer=-1. Negative layer values are only appropriate for features below regular ground level.

a ground level road that crosses under a building part should be tagged either covered:yes or the building part should be tagged as level 1(or higher)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133287027
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-03-30 10:48:18+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن غير صحيحة
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
DoctorSpeck (2023-03-06 00:11:26+00:00): Hello, I noticed your mapping around Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, I'm curious why you removed amenity: hospital and healthcare: hospital from the medical center?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133288060
JRH50 (2023-03-08 07:16:36+00:00): I mean the building is tagged a hospital.
eggie (2023-03-04 13:56:44+00:00): Beste Mark...  Hoelang blijft dit van kracht?
Wanneer er werkzaamheden zijn  dan geven we dat aan met conditional tagging. 
Bv access:conditional=no @ (2023 Sep 20-2024 Apr 3) 
en dan evt motor_vehicle=destination

Laat even weten hoe het zit, want dit blijft anders gewoon afgesloten totdat iemand er achter komt dat het hier niet meer routeert.
Geef in een note=....  aan wat er aan de hand is.

Graag reactie

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-03-04 14:10:03+00:00): De afsluiting gaat inderdaad vele maanden duren. (tot sept 2023) Ik heb de weg op highway=construction gezet. Dat is duidelijker.
Anders kan zo'n weg nog jaren op destination blijven staan. 
Bewoners zullen zelf wel weten dat ze bij hun woning kunnen komen.
Ook note=  met uitleg toegevoegd.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-03-04 14:14:19+00:00): 'k Zal nog even advies vragen wat het verstandigst is.
MarkLammers21 (2023-03-04 15:15:09+00:00): ik zie het vanzelf. Dan weet ik het voor in het vervolg.
eggie (2023-03-04 13:35:41+00:00): Dag Mark.. Wanneer je ergens niet mag lopen voegen we access=no toe. Staat er een verbodsbord? 
Dus niet nodig om een pad te verwijderen.
Aan een olifantenpaadje voeg je toe
informal=yes en  path=desire

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-03-04 13:48:41+00:00): reverted by changeset #133290586

Mocht er een bord staat Verboden toegang art 161 wvs laat het even weten.

MVG
eggie
MarkLammers21 (2023-03-04 15:14:27+00:00): Nee er staat geen bebording.
eggie (2023-03-04 15:34:40+00:00): Oke... Ik heb informal=yes toegevoegd..
Bedankt voor je reactie
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-04 12:52:03+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Markowskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1123842516
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1123842525

"Żeglińskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1123842526
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1151209358

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
syntex (2023-03-04 16:56:26+00:00): Poprawione
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
gurglypipe (2023-03-06 07:03:29+00:00): Thank you for taking the time to do this!
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
ig4map (2023-03-04 21:34:49+00:00): Could you please delete your edit as it duplicate existing feature 7Eleven with more details
emersonveenstra (2023-03-06 12:32:18+00:00): Hi,

Looks like you accidentally created a way with no tags here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1151213579

Would you mind fixing this? Thanks!
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
map per (2023-03-09 17:47:14+00:00): Wegen "Meine Änderungen überprüfen": 
Ein paar Kleinigkeiten passen noch nicht ganz:
- Die Öffnungszeiten sind so nicht maschinenlesbar. Statt "Do 10:30-20:00, Sa 10:00-16:00" sollte da "Th 10:30-20:00; Sa 10:00-16:00" stehen (vgl. (1)).
-Der name "Frische Bayerische Grillhendl" ist nicht wirklich ein Name, sondern eher eine Beschreibung (description) (vgl. (2))

Viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
(2) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description
map per (2023-03-16 08:24:08+00:00): Habs korrigiert.

Viele Grüße
map per
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
hdevine825 (2023-03-05 03:27:27+00:00): There were issues with the format of opening hours and phone number. I have fixed them.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133290462
ybungalobill (2023-03-04 22:21:31+00:00): thank you for your corrections! the iD editor makes it easy to screw these!
scarapella (2023-03-04 23:35:42+00:00): Yeah, it's really not super obvious sometimes when you're in the middle of making the edits if the multipolygon is well formed.  I usually take a look at osmi a day or two after i've done a bunch of area edits to find what i've broken :-)

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-68.47247&lat=45.28571&zoom=7&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-28 07:06:17+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1144577795/history has 側=1 key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
eggie (2023-08-05 19:41:03+00:00): bicycle=designated en foot=designated van pad gehaald. 
beter yes gebruiken. 
MVG
eggie
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
user_12500175 (2023-03-05 08:58:55+00:00): Hallo,
das sind Tiefgarageneinfahrten, es wurde letztens beschlossen diese als building=parking_entrance zu taggen.
Ich habs hier schon mal so eingetragen.

Gruß
Danfost