piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aceman444 (2025-06-22 14:52:54+00:00): Hi, thanks for updating the railway tracks. However the movement of junction points at Kazanska/Dvojkrizna streets (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/25504814 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/18003675 are all wrong. The ways representing roads can be split into 2 separate ways when there is already a physical barrier between them, or it is not physically possible to change from one lane (road) to another. If there is just a white solid line, they should not be separated. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes#Motorway_with_lanes_and_destinations . You should just have added ''change" tags, without touching the geometry.
Princess_Aurora (2023-07-19 12:44:55+00:00): Hello, mkarau;
I noticed you opened many streets from status under construction to operational.
Examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402014054
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478357941
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478357940
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65596630
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478357939
Also, you removed some nodes from this street:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/471889984
that's led to this street becoming disconnected from any street
Link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1061631528
Could you please provide us with the source you used to open these streets and fixed this issue please?
Regards
Princess_Aurora
mkarau (2023-07-19 12:53:57+00:00): Hi Princess_Aurora,

This is the current status of the roads in the area, as of July 14, 2023. All Changes are based on in-person usage of the roads. The disconnected road should be marked as no access.
Princess_Aurora (2023-07-25 14:09:31+00:00): Thank you for your response.
SekeRob (2023-07-16 15:54:20+00:00): Hi,

Oneway? Questa parte è certamente

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/860215932

Buone mappatura nel ombra
tomamic (2023-07-21 15:01:16+00:00): Hello. It's pretty confusing, to say the least. I'd say it's a pedestrian way, with limited, oneway access for cars. Lido Riccio, Abruzzo
https://maps.app.goo.gl/HsEWyvmj5jqgJCDZ6
tomamic (2023-07-21 15:09:20+00:00): PS. There's virtually no traffic, ever. So it's much safer to walk and cycle on this small road, than on the adjacent major road, where accidents happen frequently.
SekeRob (2023-07-21 16:07:59+00:00): Strange this Area Pedonale sign. There's club Barracude and other beach businesses and residents there, so traffic in summer. Have cycled that way often. Other side no vehicles sign which used to be a no-entry. Anyway I cycle it both ways because every meter not on the Adriatica is a save meter. Propose you add a oneway:bicycle=no as exception so the route works both ways + vehicle=destination.

ciao
SekeRob (2023-07-26 10:23:53+00:00): Hi,

Fixed some routing issues on your Arielli-Petriccio of type "Way access mismatch relation route=bicycle". Tested the GraphHopper/Valhalla bicycle route from P to A and A to P.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=42.36272%2C14.39968%3B42.38586%2C14.35689
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=42.3859%2C14.3569%3B42.3627%2C14.3997#map=15/42.3738/14.3783

The OSRM bicycle route does a big detour but since I know Komoot & Bosch Connect do the route correctly along the Petriccio, think it's a OSRM specific problem.

ciao
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-17 16:55:02+00:00): est-ce à l'extérieur ou dans le batiment ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138547487
Ramamonjisoa (2023-07-18 09:53:34+00:00): Oui ce point doit être placé dans le bâtiment
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-18 15:47:21+00:00): fait :)
vng_me (2023-07-15 20:51:21+00:00): If you reconsidered coastlines in this area, should remove natural=coastline tag from:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1184968553
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046894948

Otherwise, coastlines are not connected - broken.
vng_me (2023-07-15 20:55:24+00:00): And, please, a built-in validator for coastlines in JOSM.
Larmax (2023-07-15 21:09:13+00:00): Hi, thanks for pointing that out, should be fixed now. JOSM's validator didn't detect the broken coastline
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-17 16:58:19+00:00): pour l'ISTH, sans doute que c'est un amenity=college (attention c'est un faux-ami)  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dcollege
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138548192
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-19 17:13:46+00:00): ici maintenant https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11051471111
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138548192
Tomas Straupis (2023-07-16 06:49:12+00:00): service plotų tai nereikia perdaryti į highway=service, jie turėtų ir likti kaip area:highway. Jei kelias yra darytas išskirtinai tik pėstiesiems ir dviračiams, t.y. jei jis yra pažymėtas kelio ženklu dviračių ir pėsčiųjų kelias, tada privalo būti ir žyma segregated=yes|no ir kelias privalo būti highway=path. Dabar gi kažkoks bardakėlis padarytas. Taipogi sugadinti kiti pėsčiųjų žymėjimai. Todėl atšaukiu pakeitimą pilnai. Reikia atsargiau ir įdėmiau keisti.
MapsInQuestion (2023-07-16 07:48:45+00:00): ok, atsiprašau 😓. Pora klausimėlių: kada lietuvoje geriausia naudoti path vietoj footway? (žinau, kad labai daug nesutarimų yra kaip ir kur pritinka naudoti) Ar tikrai negalima naudoti *=segregated ant pedestrian gatvės? kiek supratau iš wiki, access galima žymėti ant visų highway...
Tomas Straupis (2023-07-16 08:02:46+00:00): path yra arba a) bendrinis, kai pvz.  pasakom, kad tai ir pėstiesiems foot=designated, ir dviračiams bicycle=designated, nes tada nei footway nei cycleway netinka b) miško paprastas pramintas takiukas, niekaip žmogaus neapdorotas
segregated yra skirtas būtent dviračių ir pėsčiųjų takams. highway=pedestrian yra visa gatvė, ten jokių segregated nėra. Laisvės alėjoj atskiri vektoriai dviračių takams buvo pabraižyti.
MapsInQuestion (2023-07-16 09:49:46+00:00): aaaa, aš stengiausi naudoti footway tik ten kur yra parašyta, kad dviračiams negalima, o visur kitur path, kad routinimas vestų pro juos ir neignoruotų takelių.
Dodko (2023-07-18 11:35:33+00:00): Po presunutí názov škôlky zakrýva adresu 12. Až tak tesne k iným objektom netreba dávať
vlakos555 (2023-07-18 12:21:19+00:00): Ahaaa, a už si to opravil ?
Dodko (2023-07-18 12:23:33+00:00): Nie
Tomas Straupis (2023-07-16 06:51:10+00:00): Taip, čia nėra sidewalk, bet visgi čia footway ir praėjimas arba su layer, arba building_passage.
map per (2023-07-16 16:02:37+00:00): Hello Rockedf,

are you sure this POI is placed correctly? The housenumber 10 is mapped one house further south.

Best regards
map per
Rockedf (2023-07-16 17:05:50+00:00): Greetings friend. To add the location on the map I am guided by the data provided to me by GPS coordinates using OSM. If you live in the area and you are sure it is wrongly located please feel free to make the appropriate changes.

 Thank you very much for the tip.

Best regards, 

Rockedf
map per (2023-07-17 09:00:52+00:00): Ok, moved the POI
maraf24 (2023-08-07 08:28:46+00:00): Youtube jest źródłem zmian?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-15 16:00:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawną składnię. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

W adresie strony internetowej brakuje protokołu.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1189851034

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
5R-MFT (2023-07-15 16:16:32+00:00): Website updated.
user_5359 (2023-07-16 13:28:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please take a look on http://www.osm.org/node/11048227208. Which currency did you mean with the tag currency:CAIRN=yes ?
farfromrefuge (2023-07-16 17:09:05+00:00): I wanted to say it was accepting the local currency "CAIRN". But indeed it did not appear as i expected. I thought it would be currency:XLT =  CAIRN
user_5359 (2023-07-15 19:38:18+00:00): Welcome to oSM! Please notice a name isn't an address. Please take a look on the neweset version of you new added node.
Lokai (2023-07-16 05:48:38+00:00): Guten Morgen.

Schau die mal die Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1601144 an.
Kann sein, dass die beschädigt wurde. Du kannst den OSM Inspector benutzen. 
Mag sein, dass die Relation zwischenzeitlich wieder i. O. ist ich, gerade nur ein Tablet zur Verfügung und da klappt nicht alles um zu bearbeiten.

Gruß L.
user_17551983 (2023-07-16 10:59:34+00:00): danke für den hinweis.  ich seh den weißen wald als schatten, ist inzw. offenbar aber nicht mehr vorhanden, ohne dass du eine änderung gemacht hast.

ich hatte eine multiarea-waldinsel eingekapselt, um genau das problem zu unterdrücken. 
das gesamt polygon ist lt. inspector kein problem.

daher momentan  k.a. was da los war.   
habe in den letzten monaten schon etliche wald+weinberg polyygone aufgeräumt/zerschnitten um derlei probleme loszuwerden.
user_17551983 (2023-07-16 11:37:34+00:00): der hat hier etwas geändert:
"OSM Inspector Areas ring_not_closed
Geschlossen vor etwa 3 Stunden von kartler175"
user_17551983 (2023-07-16 17:48:27+00:00): habe die stelle gefunden, wo ich den wald wahrscheinlich offen hatte.  einmal nicht rechtzeitig nachgeschaut und schon hat der klimawandel den wald weiß gefärbt.

kartler175 hat offenbar selektiv nur die wald-linie revertet - sehr nett - die anderen änderungen waren nicht betroffen.   leider hat der mich als letzten änderer nicht davon informiert.

im inspector war daher nix davon zu sehen. aber dafür gabs noch einige andere probleme auszubessern.
literan (2023-07-16 09:12:05+00:00): здравствуйте. Пожалуйста, не надо ставить на пешеходные дорожки уточняющие теги для велодорожек

как вы здесь, например, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/875803207 поставили тег cycleway=crossing

исправлю.
DegPasha (2023-07-16 09:25:51+00:00): Добрый день. Я хотел так обозначить велопереезды, извиняюсь, сделал не так
literan (2023-07-16 10:22:25+00:00): Если это то же самое, что здесь https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CLDiUsr - то это по сути отдельная велодорожка, и ее надо рисовать отдельной линией (и на нее уже ставить тот уточняющий тег)
DegPasha (2023-07-16 10:27:24+00:00): Хорошо, спасибо, это то же самое по схеме
literan (2023-07-16 11:07:08+00:00): по какой схеме?
DegPasha (2023-07-16 11:14:27+00:00): Пешеходная и рядом велосипедная
koastoas (2023-07-20 10:35:46+00:00): are there to fitness center or is one a shop?
CaldeiraG (2023-07-20 15:21:25+00:00): Related post: https://lemmy.world/post/1839929

I think he means that there are now 2 gyms there but hopefully we will get feedback soon
motorto (2023-07-20 22:18:27+00:00): No, it's just one fitness center
motorto (2023-07-20 22:24:32+00:00): Removed the duplicated here: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138786582
!i! (2024-08-04 19:36:47+00:00): Hi, der Teilhändler auf der Verkehrsinsel wirkt sehr willkürlich, magst du da kurz erläutern, was dich dazu veranlasst hat? ;-)
darthravem (2023-07-16 10:44:19+00:00): I made a mistake, there isn't a park here.
ivanbranco (2023-07-17 07:26:04+00:00): You sure? It's visible in aerial imagery
darthravem (2023-07-17 20:19:09+00:00): Quite sure, I was here in person and it wasn't marked as parking. I'll double check.
Frans S (2023-08-09 14:20:39+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
A: Not accurately drawn.
E. Buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138553873
Tomas Straupis (2023-07-16 06:53:52+00:00): Ne, miškas virš miško gaunasi sviestas sviestuotas. Atšaukiu pakeitimą.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-15 18:00:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/554478975

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2023-07-15 18:49:07+00:00): Hoi.. Het ziet er niet uit als een speeltuin. 
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=15-07-2022&loc=52.37418%2C4.836232%2C19z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-06-03&acqid=20230603_104625_PNEO-03_1_11&sensor=Pleiades-NEO

Op de laatste PDOK ook niet.
Je ziet een leisure=pitch en nog een object(Wat is dat?) sport= ?. Dat zou je kunnen intekenen en van de laatste tags kunnen voorzien.
De rest lijkt me gras. 
In editor josm kun je de laatste PDOK 2023 laden als achtergrond. 
MVG
eggie
Nico Witteman (2023-07-16 08:26:37+00:00): Dank voor de tips, ik ga er weer even kijken voor de details.
eggie (2023-07-15 18:37:39+00:00): Tip.....
Kijk even hier.. Dan zie je de defaulttags zoals routers die afhandelen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Netherlands
foot en horse=no hoeft dus niet op een trottoir. Het is default.
Groet
eggie
mrspits4ever (2023-07-15 18:56:19+00:00): Hoi Eggie

Duidelijk, ik hoef dus niet aan te geven wat wel en niet toegestaan is tenzij het met een bord is aangegeven dus.

Ik zal mijn tag wijzigingen weer ongedaan maken.

Dankjewel nog voor het nakijken :)
mrspits4ever (2023-07-15 19:09:53+00:00): Ik heb het weer gecorrigeerd https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138556496
eggie (2023-07-15 19:13:27+00:00): Prima!

Het zijn allemaal van die weetje waar je aldoende achterkomt.
Groet..
eggie
eggie (2023-07-15 19:16:19+00:00): Uitzondering is highway=path
Daar zijn foot en bicycle=yes default.. maar we taggen dat toch voor medemappers zodat ze weten dat er een 'survey' is geweest.
LostCoast (2023-07-27 16:37:39+00:00): Здравствуйте! Подскажите, что из себя представляет тропа самого спуска в сухую? Я ходил сухую пешком от Штыка до Гуамки, в том месте уже скалы под 150 метров.

Я просто не совсем понимаю, как там спускаться. Там прям пробитая тропа или нужны все же веревки?
LostCoast (2023-08-24 19:01:03+00:00): Здравствуйте! Я попробовал поискать вашу тропу от старой дороги на Мезмай, до первых скал ближе к Сухой.

Я не нашел каких-либо намеков на тропу. А в одном месте, ваша тропа вообще упирается в скалы...

Вы уверены, что нарисовали тропу корректно?
eggie (2023-07-15 18:52:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback 
Volgens de BGT heb je gelijk. Dus prima actie. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
VictorIE (2024-05-05 02:14:55+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11048417482
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11048417483

Are these private bins used by a household?
Map_HeRo (2025-06-21 20:39:08+00:00): Hallo joe2812, Du hast mit diesem CS unter der CS-Beschreibung "F-Schwanheim. Gebäude"  auf einer Fläche von mehreren tausend Quadratkilometern unzählige Änderungen verteilt. Bitte beschränke einen CS auf eine überschaubare Fläche und verfasse aussagekräftige CS-Kommentare, so wie es im Wiki beschrieben ist. In der Rhön hast Du bei Philippsthal Flurnamen aus ALKIS nach OSM übertragen. Hast Du da vor Ort mal überprüft, ob diese Namen heute noch Verwendung finden?  Wenn das nicht der Fall ist, machen die Namen in OSM keinen Sinn, oder?
Gruß Mikke
aceman444 (2024-05-18 17:42:18+00:00): Sadly, it seems most of these changes are quite useless, the buildings and roads are now in worse position than they were (at least according to neighbouring buildings). Please don't randomly shift buildings according to Bing imagery. Always cross-check other imagery. There is a better imagery from Croatian authority dgu.hr available in this area.
felipeeugenio (2023-07-16 13:21:21+00:00): Hola
Los cruces están antes de los semáforos? sería muy raro. Está seguro que no los dio vuelta?.
Por otro lado vemos que borró una farmacia. Si es que la farmacia ya no existe, sigue existiendo la dirección, por favor no borrar eso.
Por último, por favor responder los comentarios, hace unos dias fue contactado por otro mapero producto de unas ediciones incorrectas que hizo en una autopista. Es importante para preservar el trabajo de todos.

saludos
user_16965345 (2023-07-18 09:44:47+00:00): Der Tag horse=* für den crossing-Node ist hier sinn- und grundlos.
empty_child (2023-07-15 23:39:42+00:00): Hello nikyk,
Could you, please, explain why you removed so many natural tags?
nikyk (2023-07-16 05:57:20+00:00): Dear colleague, glad to see your feedback.
Indeed, I've removed many "landuse" and "natural" tags in this changeset.
The aim was to simplify futute map edits. I plan to proceed work in this area (Tskaltubo) and I'll mark landuse and natural areas again in correct way.
You see, there is one OSM editor, yusufmert, which really do big job, but he used wrong style of mapping.
You can see his edits in many, many places, I noticed his work in Tbilisi, Kutaisi, Batumi, and so on.
Unfortunately, he used great number of tiny "landuse" and "natural" objects, and those objects form a real puzzle.
Borders of those objects mask highways and those highways become hidden from direct edits.
I talked to him recently, and I asked to avoid wrong style, but I don't know if he accept my advice.
lenny32 (2023-07-17 09:51:26+00:00): Le restaurant Mongelli existe déjà https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/64424129 ; il ne faut pas le recréer mais lui ajouter un attribut si nécessaire, le nœud https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11048547506 n’est pas nécessaire et devrait être supprimé.

Le supermarché Leclerc existe déjà https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5357231860 ; il ne faut pas le recréer mais lui ajouter un attribut si nécessaire, le nœud https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11048559305 n’est pas nécessaire et devrait être supprimé.
 
El restaurante Mongelli ya existe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/64424129; no debe crearse de nuevo pero debe añadirse un atributo si es necesario, el nodo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11048547506 no es necesario y debe suprimirse.

El supermercado Leclerc ya existe https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5357231860; no debe crearse de nuevo, pero debe añadirse un atributo si es necesario. El nodo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11048559305 no es necesario y debe suprimirse.
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:58:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143714051, 143714044 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits eines users nach selbstlöschung
Kevin@RouteYou (2023-07-17 09:44:35+00:00): GR 57 doesn't seem up to date arround Bomal according to https://grsentiers.org/topo-guides/27-gr-57-vallee-de-l-ourthe-et-sentier-du-nord-9782931078181.html. Regards, Kevin.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-07-20 01:38:09+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to fictitious street names

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138740370
user_5359 (2023-07-16 14:02:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please take a look on http://www.osm.org/node/11048570718. What is the mean of the tag Tienda de Repostería = Miski Sami?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 13:49:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11048575643/history - is it hospital? clinic? charity shop? something else?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-15 21:00:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawną składnię. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

W adresie strony internetowej brakuje protokołu.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447059338
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11493384

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
syntex (2025-07-27 11:51:05+00:00): już naprawione przez kogoś innego
user_18305684 (2023-07-16 17:11:04+00:00): Hi,

welcome on osm.
the value stone maze doesn't exist on osm, this value mix 2 different informations : a natural information (there are stones) and a geographic information (the stone create like a maze). This means we have to use 2 different tags.
For the tag natural, 2 values are possible: natural=stone and natural=rock, see  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:natural#Geology_related.
Which one is the best according to you ?

Best regards
Best regards
Skogssnuvan (2023-07-17 07:13:54+00:00): Based on the definitions page, it seems rock fits the bill.
user_18305684 (2023-07-17 17:12:39+00:00): Ok,

I improved the tags.
You can read the wiki to understand the tag field.

Another way of doing this maze would have been : to create an area of the maze with the tags natural=bare_rock (an area around it or a complex area with the gorge/valley inside the maze). But without a better imagery, it means probably to go there with a GPS (and with the rocks the GPS will not work perfectly).

So I think your choice of a node is the good choice.

Good continuation.

Best regards

note : I don't know if you saw it, but I also improved your clearcut https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1189798561/history
MxxCon (2023-07-16 17:59:06+00:00): Hydrant in the middle of the road?🤨
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138560239
ElliottPlack (2023-07-16 18:03:10+00:00): Side of the road
eggie (2023-07-16 04:53:25+00:00): Dag Bryan
Alle begin is moeilijk. Je hebt het adres ook verwijderd. Ik zal dat herstellen.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=138560590
MVG
eggie
SzymonH (2023-07-17 07:47:03+00:00): Rondo jest budowane na skrzyżowaniu ulic Towarowej i 1 Maja - wszystko zostało prawidłowo oznaczone wcześniej. Budowa zaznaczona w tej edycji jest błędna, bo na skrzyżowaniu ulic Towarowej/11 Listopada i 3 Maja nic się nie buduje!
Olga | Yanosik (2023-07-17 08:52:15+00:00): Przepraszam za zamieszanie, edycja wycofana.
adiatmad (2023-07-17 02:43:52+00:00): Translate from Google Translate
---
با سلام، ویرایش‌های شما به نظر خوب می‌رسند. اما فکر می‌کنم با تغییر این عنصر (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/617134499) شما یک ساختمان بزرگ ایجاد 
کرده‌اید. توصیه می‌کنم آن را به landuse=residential تغییر دهید.
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential). Thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138560830
user_5589 (2023-07-15 23:17:18+00:00): You're removing valid tags with a lot of your edits. Please stop doing this now.

maxspeed=70 mph and maxspeed=60 mph and maxspeed=30 mph should not be removed from any road within the UK unless they are incorrect speed limits. maxspeed:type is NOT a substitute for these tags. It is an addition to them.
Nathan_A_RF (2023-07-16 15:33:24+00:00): Then you need to speak to the StreetComplete team who's edits only add maxspeed:type tags for national speed limit roads in the UK. I'm confused what to do now. They say only one tag, now you say both. Who's right?
Nathan_A_RF (2023-07-16 15:40:53+00:00): If you come to some sort of conclusion I will go over the area and add the missing tags, if required.
user_5589 (2023-07-16 18:52:30+00:00): You know my conclusion.

Stop deleting valid tags.

You aren't just adding those extra tags. You are removing extant valid tags. There is a difference.

Oh and as for Streetcomplete? Number 3 contributor in the UK and number 20 contributor worldwide. So yes I am quite aware of that piece of software thank you.
Nathan_A_RF (2023-07-16 19:44:30+00:00): You don't need to be arrogant. I shall add them back, but if I am told otherwise again then I shall mention this short exchange.
MxxCon (2023-07-16 18:01:54+00:00): Shouldn't cemeteries be "permissive" rather than "private"? ie everybody is allowed to come unless get kicked out...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138561185