piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
literan (2025-11-05 19:26:21+00:00): вообще, ФГБУ «Транспортный комбинат «Россия» это название учреждения, у которого много площадок. А не название этой автобазы...
solenoid jam (2025-11-06 10:54:44+00:00): На сайте указано, что переименована, площадок несколько, но называется ли это  Автобазой 1?
literan (2025-11-06 18:19:32+00:00): да, наверное ты прав. У них на сайте тоже нет такого названия https://www.tkrossia.ru/about.html
silversurfer83 (2025-11-05 19:01:33+00:00): Hi there :)

this looks like two pickleball courts next to one tennis court.

So next time it would be better to trace each court separately and then tag it according to
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dpickleball

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174213793
felipeeugenio (2025-11-07 22:44:39+00:00): Hola Eduardo. Agregar líneas de buses es algo bastante más complicado que esto (lamentablemente). Si preguntas en el chat te podemos orientar en cómo hacerlo.
Saludos
Eduardo17172 (2025-11-08 13:07:30+00:00): Lo hare
Langlaeufer (2025-11-09 17:34:29+00:00): Hi,
die Abiegerelationen müssen mindestens via-Element (hier der gemeinsame Knoten) enthalten.
Grüße Langläufer
DeFra85 (2025-11-09 20:11:14+00:00): 👍
aharvey (2025-11-04 22:42:05+00:00): hi and welcome to OSM. The building outline should follow the building footprint instead of the property boundary. You can take a look at how other buildings nearby have been mapped to check.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-04 23:53:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2602376569
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/206850926

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Yherisson (2025-11-04 23:15:25+00:00): I reverted this change, imagery is recent, but they put paving stone very recently, I went there. The whole neighborhood is under heavy work (4 building destructed) many changes
VLD192 (2025-11-06 15:29:12+00:00): Hello,
Thank you for the heads up, and thanks for making the fix. Much appreciated. 
Casey (VLD192)
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-04 23:54:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4194667113
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/853732641

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1395460508

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Znaika (2025-11-05 13:09:30+00:00): Hi,
bitte keine doppelte Adressen eintragen, wenn es ein Anbau beim Haus ist. Wie hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355477720
Gruß, Znaika
Znaika (2025-11-05 13:14:59+00:00): Falsche Meldung. Das war User Solderdot nicht du
Glassman (2025-11-06 18:08:14+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174215551
Glassman (2025-11-06 18:08:28+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174215738
spalinger (2025-11-09 18:07:58+00:00): Thank you!
Glassman (2025-11-06 18:09:45+00:00): #TIP: street names are spelled out since software has a hard time with abbreviated words. Otherwise the edit looks good.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174217104
infeeeee (2025-11-21 18:52:16+00:00): Szia!

Facebook oldalak címét nem a website hanem contact:facebook mezőben tároljuk. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:facebook

További jó térképezést!
eggie (2025-11-05 08:34:42+00:00): boundary	administrative losgemaakt van landuse.
Wanneer een gebied van je edits zo groot is geworden is er meestal nog iets gebeurd. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=174217290
MVG
eggie
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-11-07 00:09:16+00:00): Merhaba. Köyün içindeki birçok yolun etiketini highway=tertiary'e çevirmşsiniz. Değişikliğinizi geri aldım. Türkiye'de yolların nasıl etiketlenmesi gerektiğini şuradan okuyabilirsiniz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tr:Turkey_roads_tagging

İyi günler.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174311811
Glassman (2025-11-06 18:15:03+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174217743
Glassman (2025-11-06 18:16:59+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174217808
eggie (2025-11-05 08:30:02+00:00): Dag Sumurai.. Je hebt hier de adresnode verwijderd. Beter alleen de bedrijfsinfo verwijderen.
ddr:city	Sappemeer	
addr:housenumber	85	
addr:postcode	9611AB	
addr:street	Noorderstraat	
amenity	restaurant	
cuisine	regional	
name	't Viszaakje	
opening_hours	Tu-Sa 10:00-18:00	
phone	+31 6 17300263	
website	http://hetviszaakje.nl/

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-11-05 08:31:21+00:00): Ah.. Het was geen BAGnode
Glassman (2025-11-06 18:15:28+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174217927
literan (2025-11-05 20:35:46+00:00): а здесь кроме больницы есть еще и поликлиника? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2499654

и это разные заведения?
randomaper (2025-11-06 13:38:47+00:00): Как пользователю найти Медси в Отрадном? Название должно быть простым (Медси)
literan (2025-11-06 18:17:17+00:00): я все же еще раз повторю вопрос. Вы уверены, что там есть поликлиника Медси, которую вы нанесли? 

Я знаю, что там есть больница Медси, и она уже отмечена. И плюс к ней еще и поликлиника, как отдельное учреждение?
literan (2025-11-06 19:59:14+00:00): а, вижу, что уже исправили. Насчет того, чтобы сделать name=Медси, я согласен. Сделаю.
user_5359 (2025-11-05 06:25:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! 
Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/7237744510
 more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position. If you need help, you are welcome!
Comino (2025-11-05 11:10:52+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
Lumikeiju (2025-12-15 19:57:01+00:00): Hi! Thank you for helping with mapping public transit in Seattle!

I broadly agree with your changes - unabbreviating the street names in the `name=*` value is in line with OSM best practices, and I'll continue forward that practice in any of my future edits.

I also agree that we need some GTFS feed namespacing as doing so is the best way to avoid key conflicts.

I'm not sure about the format, though: I see you went with `gtfs:$field:$feed=*`, but namespacing in `ref=*` (for example) generally follows a `ref:$identifier:$field=*`, as in `ref:US-WA:SDOT:UNITID=*`.

What are your thoughts on switching to `gtfs:$identifier:$field=*`, as in `gtfs:stop_id:US-WA-KCM=29640` → `gtfs:US-WA-KCM:stop_id=29640`?

I don't have a very strong opinion one way or the other, but I'm happy to discuss! Thanks again.
Itserpol (2025-12-15 20:44:10+00:00): Thank you so much for reaching out! I'm always happy to help improve the state of public transit data on OSM.

I also have no strong opinions regarding whether the GTFS feed identifier should come before or after the relevant tag key. The reason for my choice of format is that it is what's <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GTFS#Linking_to_a_GTFS_object" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" dir="auto">given in the GTFS wiki page</a>.

I understand that the wiki isn't a bible, but I figure anyone else searching for a reference on how to properly link GTFS data to OSM transit routes would do the same as me, and I'm wary of creating a competing standard.
Lumikeiju (2026-01-16 00:10:24+00:00): That's reasonable!

I started a forum thread to get some others' thoughts: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gtfs-namespace-key-formatting/140506
MassCartog (2025-11-05 03:57:03+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. In this changeset you dragged some nodes way out of place. I have fixed them, but be careful not to drag nodes around you don't mean to, and review your changes before publishing. 

Also look out for warnings list when you go to publish. If there are warnings, click on them to fix them before publishing. Thanks!
Yog Sot (2025-11-05 10:30:13+00:00): połączyłeś trawę z przęsłem wiaduktu ;s
❤️‍🔥 (2025-11-07 08:57:30+00:00): Hi, please read the comments on your previous edits. It would be even better if you could reply... 

for example https://osm.org/changeset/171474304
ralley (2025-11-12 23:30:59+00:00): You also added the house number to the road itself - fixed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174218725
AndresDuhour (2026-03-19 10:29:26+00:00): Buen día! Quería comentar sobre el agregado de restricciones y las veredas.  Lo que se ve en las fotos del puente y del boulevard san juan es que tiene las veredas como parte de la calle. No hay un puente separado para la senda peatonal. Entonces la combinación del puente separado con la etiqueta foot=no hace que no haya ruteo para peatones. Creo que lo más adecuado sería agregar sidewalk=left o sidewalk=right al tramo de calle que corresponda. De otra manera, habría que mapear todas las veredas como vías separadas. Qué te parece?
tastrax (2025-11-05 03:43:35+00:00): Thanks for your edits. Its best practice to create individual buildings rather than digitising around several at once. You can also use the Q key in the ID editor to square the corners of the buildings. This helps to make a quality map. I will cleanup some of these as an example. - Cheers Phil
felipeeugenio (2025-11-05 10:37:17+00:00): Hola. Es un poco difícil de digerir esta edición. Modificó demasiadas cosas. Borró muchas también. Por favor, hacer ediciones más pequeñas al principio.
Los pasillos que metió dentro de los edificios realmente existen? o se trata de un error?

Por favor cuidar las formas de los edificios. Es difícil de creer que tengan esas formas. 

Acabo de corregir bastantes cosas, pero me quedan varias dudas.

Gracias
felipeeugenio (2025-11-05 10:37:27+00:00): Hola. Es un poco difícil de digerir esta edición. Modificó demasiadas cosas. Borró muchas también. Por favor hacer ediciones más pequeñas al principio.
Los pasillos que metió dentro de los edificios realmente existen? o se trata de un error?

Por favor cuidar las formas de los edificios. Es difícil de creer que tengan esas formas. 

Acabo de corregir bastantes cosas, pero me quedan varias dudas.

Gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174219330
felipeeugenio (2025-11-05 10:37:46+00:00): Hola. Es un poco difícil de digerir esta edición. Modificó demasiadas cosas. Borró muchas también. Por favor hacer ediciones más pequeñas al principio.
Los pasillos que metió dentro de los edificios realmente existen? o se trata de un error?

Por favor cuidar las formas de los edificios. Es difícil de creer que tengan esas formas. 

Acabo de corregir bastantes cosas, pero me quedan varias dudas.

Gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174219330
Frans S (2025-11-05 09:41:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
You mapped quite a number incorrect.

About complex buildings. Especial the high rise (multi story) buildings and buildings which shows their side views  as well. Check this footage how to map these buildings 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsfUcslLtVc
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing 

Lower buildings, showing their sidewalls as well, can be mapped on the same way by moving the mapped roofline to the groundplan.

Please square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2026-07-23 13:06:28+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she deliver high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (See attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping.  Buildings ought to be tagged as building=yes !

B: Overlapping buildings.

C: Collected adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.

E: Buildings not squared or rounded.


F: Buildings partly hidden under trees.

G: Included the shadow of the building.

H: Included a yard of clearing.


Explanation can be found in this document, which might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards, and keep mapping!
Frans S
Glassman (2025-11-10 22:32:42+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Reverted
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174220427
Glassman (2025-11-10 22:33:06+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Reverted
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174220427
Glassman (2025-11-10 22:32:56+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Reverted
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174220620
Glassman (2025-11-10 22:33:20+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Reverted
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174220675
Glassman (2025-11-10 22:33:36+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

reverted
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174220694
32kWebikeaddict (2025-11-05 14:17:17+00:00): If this path is still walkable, would it qualify for a path tag? It's not really useful for going anywhere since it simply ends in the middle of the woods.
Julysfire (2025-11-05 03:39:58+00:00): Ways that have added nodes have these tags: [('landuse/farmland', 40), ('building/silo', 34), ('waterway/ditch', 32), ('building/yes', 31), ('layer/-1', 18), ('tunnel/culvert', 18), ('natural/tree_row', 15), ('waterway/stream', 9), ('landuse/farmyard', 5), ('natural/wood', 5), ('highway/unclassified', 4), ('landuse/residential', 4), ('bridge/yes', 3), ('layer/1', 3), ('natural/water', 2), ('name/Big Pine Creek', 2), ('waterway/river', 2), ('highway/residential', 2), ('name/South 600 East', 2), ('name/South 750 East', 2), ('name/South 900 East', 2), ('barrier/guard_rail', 2), ('barrier/fence', 2), ('type/multipolygon', 2), ('advertising/billboard', 1), ('natural/grassland', 1), ('natural/sand', 1)]

Ways that were modified had these tags: [('highway/unclassified', 6), ('highway/residential', 3), ('landuse/farmland', 3), ('name/South 750 East', 1), ('name/South 600 East', 1), ('name/South 1150 East', 1), ('name/South 900 East', 1), ('name/East 700 South', 1), ('name/East 800 South', 1), ('name/East 900 South;East 1100 North', 1), ('oneway/no', 1), ('surface/gravel', 1), ('tiger:name_type_2/Rd', 1), ('name/South 1100 East', 1), ('name/East 750 South', 1), ('name/Big Pine Creek', 1), ('waterway/river', 1), ('electrified/no', 1), ('gauge/1435', 1), ('name/Lafayette Line', 1), ('note:old_railway_operator/LE&W', 1), ('old_railway_operator/NKP', 1), ('operator/Kankakee, Beaverville and Southern Railroad', 1), ('operator:wikidata/Q12060955', 1), ('railway/rail', 1), ('reporting_marks/KBSR', 1), ('usage/branch', 1), ('waterway/ditch', 1)]
user_5359 (2025-11-05 06:20:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/1968735800
 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
CjMalone (2026-03-05 17:06:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1447622966

Was this meant to be highway=services or highway=service? surface=path is also questionable.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-11-06 13:25:38+00:00): Bonjour! Merci pour la mise à jour.

Par contre, juste faire attention à l'alignement incorrect dans Bing ou autres photos aériennes. L'alignement du belvédère du fleuve et son bâtiment était correct et utilisait les données des bornes géodésiques. Merci de ne pas déplacer les bâtiments ou rues/sentier/pistes sans avoir accès à des photos aériennes alignées correctement ou sans vérifier avec l'éditeur précédent.

Merci et bonne journée!
Pierre-Felix Breton (2025-11-06 16:06:36+00:00): Merci pour le commentaire.  J'utilise generalement les services d'imageries aeriennes du gouv quebec:

https://mrnf.gouv.qc.ca/repertoire-geographique/vue-aerienne-quebec-imagerie-continue/

qui sont assez precises du moins, generalement mieux alignees que Bing etc?
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-11-06 16:28:37+00:00): Ah Je vois! Donc elles sont bien alignées, par contre, elles sont alignées au sol, donc il faut aligner la base du bâtiment. J'ai corrigé, vous pourrez aller voir ce que ça donne. Vous pouvez utiliser Bing avec l'offset 0.6,-1.54 pour voir les bâtiments plus hauts, car les photos de Bing sont alignées verticalement à partir de plusieurs images. :-)
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-11-06 16:29:38+00:00): Cet offset (0.6,-1.54) est bon juste pour les photos Bing 2020 dans la région de Montréal
NeisBot (2025-11-05 04:21:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-05 04:21:41+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Moving company in California"
NeisReview (2025-11-08 21:52:20+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174224563
silversurfer83 (2025-11-05 19:06:01+00:00): Hi there :)

could you please explain why you changed the highway tags?

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174222328
ZLima12 (2025-11-08 22:36:34+00:00): Hi,

Overall, this looks good. I did change the end of PA-33 from trunk to motorway_link, which I think is more appropriate here. I also changed the short segment of PA-423 leading to I-380 back to secondary; in most cases I think it is better not to upgrade these kinds of short segments just because it leads to a highway, but especially so in this case because people following the primary route would continue north to the next interchange instead.

I am not from the area, so I'm not familiar with the road you upgraded from tertiary to secondary. From the tags on it, it seems like TIGER thought it is a state route; is this the case? If so, then yes, it should probably be secondary. Otherwise, I would make it secondary if it is a particularly important local or county route.

The one last thing is please try to keep your changesets contained to one area. In this case, you edited a road in Maine in addition to the main edits in Pennsylvania. If you made the Maine edit a separate changeset, it would have made the bounding box much smaller and wouldn't grab the attention of people monitoring recent changesets as much.
stevea (2025-11-05 04:45:31+00:00): Nice work, Mike!  The bridge is already starting to render, and no changes to existing USBR 50 relation, as is correct.

The "sail the paper airplane to Caltrans" that this might be incorporated into USBR 50 routing in some future AASHTO USBRS Round has begun.  Will wheels turn and heads nod?  We hope they will!
Frans S (2025-11-13 11:44:49+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark.
Please do not map wood areas. 
You are only allowed to map within your task square. Woods covers multiple tasks and ought to be mapped direct on OSM. Not in this project. It is not required as well.
Best regards
۶۶مهندس (2025-11-05 16:17:20+00:00): خیابان حجاب در این لوکیشن حذف شده لطفا هرچه سریعتر اطلاعات را درست کنید. با تشکر
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 11:06:31+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 11:10:27+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
Frans S (2025-11-13 11:06:16+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please map more accurate and square the rectangular buildings. 
Tagging should be building=yes. Nothing else.
Best regards and keep mapping
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 11:05:57+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 11:05:35+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
user_5359 (2025-11-07 09:14:13+00:00): Hello! What is the mean of the tag Melissa = none? Did you mean damage:Melissa?
silversurfer83 (2025-11-05 19:52:59+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

danke, dass du hilfst die Datenbank aktuell zu halten. Gerade Defis (AEDs) sind sehr wichtige POI.

Daher mein Hinweis: Die Eigenschaft "location" (also der Ort, wo sich etwas befindet) darf bei AEDs gerne recht exakt beschrieben werden. "AED DGH" kann bei größeren Gebäuden doch recht unscharf sein.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174223854
Warin61 (2026-02-24 23:47:32+00:00): Relation relation 19795228 deleted - conflicts with 
address nodes.
separation of buildings 
only has role 'inners'.
BubbaJuice (2025-11-30 05:29:18+00:00): Hi,

Common practice is to have landcover multipolygons be separated if they do not touch. Please have each scrub area be its own multipolygon.
BubbaJuice (2025-11-30 05:31:47+00:00): Also please use JOSM when editing such large areas. iD does not have a verification capacity to make sure you are uploading quality data.