piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kitsee (2024-09-19 15:00:23+00:00): Hi RunEveryStreet,
Welcome to OSM. I believe you have made a small mistake here, max height should be added to the road that is affected not to the road on the bridge. I've fixed this now.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156816387
RunEveryStreet (2024-09-19 17:14:59+00:00): How did you notice?
danieldegroot2 (2024-09-19 16:23:34+00:00): Thank you for removing this POI.
Yes, there was some kind of Medieval Mile information column or similar here, but it is no longer there. The original position is still visible in the tiling.
This and a few other information markers were repositioned or demolished at the same time.
2023:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1234227897295173&focus=photo

2024:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1517579655473566&focus=photo

Regards,

Daniel
habi (2024-12-12 10:57:16+00:00): Ciao Jimmy
I'm looking at 'strange' highway=*-Values in Switzerland and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364588341 popped up.
Large parts of it *are* visible on aerial imagery, so I changed those.
Happy mapping,
habi
habi (2024-12-12 11:05:07+00:00): I changed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160203024, btw
jimmy_conway (2024-12-13 17:56:51+00:00): Hallo, ich war Mitte August 2024 vor Ort, der Pfad ist vom etwas oberhalb verlaufenden Feldweg nicht mehr erkennbar/zugewachsen. Die Wiese war zudem durch einen Weidezaun abgesperrt und dadurch nicht begehbar. Ich würde also empfehlen diese Änderung zurückzunehmen und erst nach vor-Ort-Bestätigung vorzunehmen. Viele Grüße!
habi (2024-12-14 21:12:24+00:00): Super, wenn du da gewesen bist, dann kannst du das grad selber richtig erfassen, `bicycle=yes` und `highway=no` wie in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364588341/history/5 ist ziemlich sicher ziemlich falsch.
danieldegroot2 (2024-09-19 16:40:33+00:00): Hey MapMeDaddy,

Could you verify this POI still exists, please?
(write a reply to this changeset if you can)
If it does I can add a check date if the quest is not available for you.
Let me know when you can.
Unfortunately, there is currently no imagery of this side of the building.

Regards,

Daniel
MapMeDaddy (2024-09-20 10:20:42+00:00): HI Daniel,

This POI (Point of interest?) does exist. There is no name or signs of a name. It is a small fast food counter selling burgers and chips  etc.
danieldegroot2 (2024-09-20 12:17:10+00:00): Yes, correct. Thanks for the reply.
I added the check date tag in
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=156864734
flohoff (2024-09-19 14:08:39+00:00): Moin,
was steht da für ein Schild bzw was ist der exakte Wortlaut - Der sollte als note:access auf den Weg.

Dein changeset kommentar impliziert so ein bisschen das das ja ein Privatweg ist.

access=private ist aber nicht Privatweg. Durch das service/driveway ist DAS bereits gesagt.

Weiteres access tagging kommt da nur drauf wenn da ein Tor/Kette ist oder eben solche Schilder wie "Betreten verboten" 

Selbst ein "Durchfahrt verboten" ist nicht access=private sondern vehicle=destination

Deshalb ist hier der exakte Wortlaut der Beschilderung wichtig.

Flo
skadi (2025-04-27 12:10:27+00:00): зачем ты удаляешь нормальные дороги?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-19 12:21:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4376803116
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/682206033

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Piotr Strębski (2024-09-20 11:59:24+00:00): Zrobione, dzięki!
tastrax (2024-09-20 11:34:57+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
kpv8 (2024-09-19 12:30:59+00:00): Jakie są źródła tych ulic? Na geoportalu ich nie ma, na Sentinelu też? Od fikcyjnego mapowania jest geofiction. Dalsze wandalizmy skończą się blokadą.
NeisBot (2024-09-19 12:30:38+00:00): Hi luis_2089, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 87% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 47 building(s)
- 1 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=156817902
pitscheplatsch (2024-09-24 05:40:31+00:00): Ok, some contributors have added buildings, while others have occasionally removed them at a later time.
eggie (2024-09-19 16:30:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback De adresnode Olmenlaan 7 heb ik verwijderd. Dat is niet hier.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Ygramul (2024-09-20 07:56:34+00:00): Hi, du hast hier bei vielen Wegen den Key "check_date:smothness" und "source:smothness" (da fehlt jeweils ein o) verwendet. Ich hab das jetzt einfach mal so korrigiert, letzteres kann meines Erachtens aber eigentlich auch wegfallen. Für smoothness gibt es nicht so viele Möglichkeiten, das zu erfassen. Ich denke, der Wert "survey" (also Vor-Ort-Betrachtung) ist auch deutlich verbreiteter für "source" als "I myself".
user_3716049 (2024-09-24 19:37:49+00:00): Hi  Ygramul,
danke für deinen Hinweis und die Fehlerkorrektur. Leider scheint JOSM keine Rechtschreibprüfung zu unterstützen, konnte zumindest weder bei den Validator Einstellung noch bei den Plug-ins etwas finden.

Was die Quellenangabe betrifft, die statt MG informiert recht gut über Straßenbauarbeiten. Man könnte also auch ohne survey einiges mappen.
An stellen, die mit bad oder intermiade gemappt, sind, werde ich das wohl auch ohne Prüfung aktualisieren 
, wenn diese für mich zu abgelegen sind. Ein Eintrag halte deshalb schon für sinnvoll, kann aber survey eintragen wenn das gewünscht ist.

https://mags.de/strassenunterhaltung/

https://www.moenchengladbach.de/de/aktuell-aktiv/newsroom/verkehrsmeldungen/hier-wird-gebuddelt

Gruß Kelso
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-19 12:40:48+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11897092063
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1316668093

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-21 01:30:18+00:00): Incorrect location.
If you're adding new stuff not on imagery please get a gpx trace and/or street-level imagery.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156818308
Layft Greater (2024-09-21 07:32:13+00:00): Spaghetti Monster,

I would like to point two topics here:

1. The location of the intersection was mapped not here but in changeset #156722732.
This edit changes the junction type from "construction" to "completed" after survey. Unfortunately, street-level imagery is not possible around military area.

2. By your comment I was expecting the location of the intersection will be adjusted but not completely removed. The junction was OK as it was.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism 

Will you will you be able to revert your edit #156892742?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-21 07:45:05+00:00): upload a gpx trace https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Upload_GPS_tracks#Applications_supporting_direct_upload_of_GPS_traces and map it at the correct location. 
I will not add bad data back into the map.
Layft Greater (2024-09-21 11:55:13+00:00): One person has surveyed and mapped the junction construction. Another one has serveyed and mapped the construction completed.
Survey by the two independent people is enough evidence.

I guess I have to escalate this situation
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-21 20:08:45+00:00): You're free to add it at the correct location
Afrandez (2024-09-22 13:29:01+00:00): someone tell me which one is foolish; to demand a gps track from INSIDE of a military area that you can't go on foot, or prioritizing year old(read:outdated) imageries over live observations from site.
SomeoneElse (2024-09-22 16:21:00+00:00): @Spaghetti%20Monster%F0%9F%8D%9D - have you ever been to this area of Cyprus?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-22 20:48:14+00:00): gps trace is possible if its possible to survey.
Copernicus imagery shows that its not close to the mapped location while not being clear enough to map it accurately.
SomeoneElse (2024-09-22 21:10:10+00:00): @Spaghetti%20Monster%F0%9F%8D%9D You haven't answered the question :)
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-22 23:55:05+00:00): No
Afrandez (2024-09-23 08:51:42+00:00): Thought so. Although I don't have any obligation to prove my point, I dug into the app I'm using to record stuff on site and turns out, the app has recorded traces every time it was open on phone, and better yet, there is one for this area.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Afrandez/traces/11467331

If you are still not convinced, I'm sure a mediation from admin side can resolve the matter
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-23 09:14:09+00:00): I have no issue with the road being mapped at the correct location. 
The issue was with the inaccuracy especially with the connecting roads added by Layft which were in a considerably wrong heading based only on ditches in the outdated imagery. 

Does Go Map allow notes and/or photos attached to traces to note the intersection location? I'm not familiar with the app.
Afrandez (2024-09-23 09:28:16+00:00): I am not much familiar either, I found this app merely a week ago out of randomness and I don't see any option about adding or taking images or notes from app side.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-23 09:35:45+00:00): I added the roundabout at the correct location and a rough layout of the connecting roads using your trace and Copernicus Sentinel-2 L2A imagery from 9-19.

Please add details from you surveys as needed.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-23 09:45:08+00:00): Mapillary allows for manual image capture and upload in their mobile app or you can upload any photos with the desktop uploader.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapillary
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-23 09:46:50+00:00): If you're out there again it would be very appreciated if possible.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-23 09:51:13+00:00): Only if its not dangerous or getting you in trouble of course.
eggie (2024-09-19 16:38:33+00:00): Tip Niet op de gebouwomtrek taggen, maar op de adresnode svp..
gr eggie
eggie (2024-09-19 16:41:10+00:00): merged info with addressnode
woodpeck (2024-09-24 12:34:08+00:00): Dear Valeri_2408, place=plot is not the correct tag for a building. building=yes is sufficient. Do not use "edificio" as a building name - the name is only there if a building has a special name like "World Trade Center" or something like that.
habi (2025-03-17 08:51:36+00:00): Ciao Simon
Werden die Haltestellen denn jetzt noch verwendet, ansonsten könntest du diese jetzt löschen...
Gruss,
habi
eggie (2024-09-20 13:02:42+00:00): Spitze! ...........Aber.....  
Website=https://www.biodromegoes.nl  klappt nicht.
Gibt es noch immer ein Laden hier? 
 
Grüss,
eggie
deepblue66 (2024-10-15 12:38:00+00:00): Ja, ich war drin und habe eingekauft. Gutes Angebot und freundliche Beratung.
Die Website stammt von einem Schild, aber die funktioniert nicht. Ich habe dann die Facebook-Adresse hinterlegt.
eggie (2024-10-15 12:59:25+00:00): 👍
eggie (2024-09-19 16:33:21+00:00): Dag Moonraven Het hotel staat toch al op de kaart?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-19 16:37:14+00:00): Kijk je nog even.. Of alle info op de adresnode of de info op het gebouw controleren. de tagging spreekt elkaar tegen.
gr eggie
MoonRaven (2024-09-19 16:38:19+00:00): Hmm vreemd, ik zag hem niet voorbij komen toen ik keek, ik zie hem nu inderdaad staan.
MoonRaven (2024-09-19 16:39:24+00:00): Ah, de ene keer is het gebouw gemarkeerd, de andere keer is het een pin. Deze kan dan eventueel weg.
eggie (2024-09-19 17:17:35+00:00): De adresnode heeft de voorkeur.
Evt de extra info kopieren .
Mapse
eggue
eggie (2024-09-19 16:46:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Gebruikelijk is om de tagging van de trottoirs op te nemen in de tagging van de hoofdrijbaan met sidewalk=right of left of both. 
Zoals je het nu hebt gedaan routeert het niet op de kaart. Probeer maar eens de straat over te steken.
Misschien heb je je afgevraagd waarom al die trottoirs niet zijn gemapt in OSM? 
Voor de routering heb je er niets aan zo. Je zit gevangen in je eigen blokje om. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 03:33:11+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164658873
eggie (2024-09-19 16:32:39+00:00): Tip  Near my work zegt niets voor andere mappers. Graag concreet commentaar bij uploads.
gr eggie
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-02 23:53:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159862440, 159862427, 159862512, 159862481, 159862457, 159862433 where the changeset comment is: revert roblox_gmx edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16954
mga_geo (2024-09-22 07:57:02+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi avez-vous découpé le rond-point ?
Cela a cassé des relations route=bus.
Normalement ce genre de modifications avec JOSM n'a pas ces conséquences si l'on charge la zone avant.
Marc
simon_geovelo (2024-09-23 07:07:30+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai découpé le rond point pour la relation veloroute la littorale.
J'ai utilisé JOSM en ayant chargé les données avant. La relation n'aurait pas dus être cassé. Il y avait quoi comme problème dans la relation bus ?
mga_geo (2024-09-23 11:42:26+00:00): Il n'y avait aucun problème début septembre sur la relation bus.
Une relation véloroute n'est pas comme une relation bus, elle a besoin de découper les ronds-points ?
simon_geovelo (2024-09-23 12:09:03+00:00): La véloroute n'empreinte qu'une partie du rond point, d'ou la coupure.
Je viens de vérifier toutes les relations bus qui passe par le rond point. Aucune ne me semble cassée. Pourriez vous me dire le problème ou me donner l'outil qui remonte le problème pour que je puisse corriger ?
mga_geo (2024-09-25 13:25:03+00:00): Les relations concernées du réseau Kicéo sont : r3447722 r7091938 r2651174 r12255740 r12255741
J'interroge Osmose sur la région Bretagne pour trouver les trous dans routes.
Dans le cas présent, je regardais les mises à jour à faire sur Kicéo.
Les applications pour les autres véhicules qui empruntent les ronds-points n'ont pas besoin que ceux-ci soient découpés.
simon_geovelo (2024-09-25 15:00:11+00:00): Dans JOSM la relation est continue et complète. 
C'est quelle analyse sur osmose qui remonte l’erreur ?
mga_geo (2024-09-27 05:20:38+00:00): Mon JOSM n'en pense pas la même chose : https://imgur.com/pzgDZ07

J'utilise dans ce cas la requête http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/api/0.3/issues?country=france_bretagne*&item=1260&class=1&limit=2000
simon_geovelo (2024-09-27 07:18:21+00:00): Pour josm la relation est bien continue. Il ne gère pas l'affichage des rond points découpé (dans ce cas la piste cyclable ne faisant pas le tours complet du rond point je suis dans l'obligation de découpé), mais tout est connecté.
Je viens de redécouper le rond point pour faire plaisir à JOSM.

Pour l'analyse osmose je ne vois pas d'erreurs de géométries, mais des erreurs de plateforme  du mauvais coté de la route. Je n'ai pas toucher aux plateformes.
mga_geo (2024-09-27 09:29:00+00:00): Mon JOSM est toujours mécontent cf https://imgur.com/oH3Gl0m et JOSM gère les ronds-points découpés comme des ways indépendantes et appliquent les mêmes règles qu'à ces ways.
Effectivement si la piste cyclable ne fait pas tout le tour du rond-point, il faut découper.
simon_geovelo (2024-09-27 09:54:20+00:00): j'avais pas envoyer mes modification. Normalement, toutes les relations sont corrigées
eggie (2024-09-19 16:31:38+00:00): Tip  Als het goed is zijn er al adresnodes hier. Je kunt dan ook direct op de adresnode bijtaggen.
MVG
eggie
martien-176 (2024-09-25 18:53:28+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings.

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can.

The imagery may fool you sometimes in that it seems a building has no square corners. You can use alternative imagery to double check.

Also please be cautious with deleting features. If a building is badly traced, do not delete, but fix it instead.

You added a layer tag to a few buildings. Probably iD Editor advised you to do so to solve the issue of overlapping features. A layer tag is meant to indicate that an object is located on top of another object, eg a bridge over water. Here however you should follow the other advice iD gives you, namely retrace the building so that it does not overlap.

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156819696
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-09-19 13:10:20+00:00): dostępność z wizyty na miejscu
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-11-01 09:08:31+00:00): Đường Nguyễn Công Hoan là 1 chiều oto, oto chỉ đi được từ Phan Xích Long -> Trần Kế Xương. Xe máy 2 chiều. Bạn cẩn thận nhé. Cám ơn
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-09 05:08:24+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12186148583/history has amenity = none that was added in this edit
amenity=none ? What it is supposed to mean?
TrickyFoxy (2024-09-22 07:15:36+00:00): 👋 1=yes What did you mean by that?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1316677966
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1316677967
Vinber-Pro (2024-09-19 14:59:54+00:00): salut, c'est voulu de sortir organic=only ? ce n'est pas que du bio ?
Evamap40 (2024-09-19 15:20:37+00:00): Oui. Elle n'a pas de label AB, cultive des plantes tinctorielles et remonte sur la carto dans les magasins bio
Evamap40 (2024-09-19 15:20:55+00:00): Même si c'est plus bio que bio...
Vinber-Pro (2024-09-19 15:25:19+00:00): organic=only n'est pas forcément le label ... 
et elle devait remonter comme shop=farm et organic=only (magasin à la "ferme"). .. à creuser
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-02 23:53:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159862440, 159862427, 159862512, 159862481, 159862457, 159862433 where the changeset comment is: revert roblox_gmx edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16954
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2024-09-19 13:36:50+00:00): Hello,
please try to draw squared building (when they are); I see you are applying the same weird geometry to all the building.

Cheers,
  Alessandro
eggie (2024-09-19 16:50:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Cicuta33 (2024-09-20 07:17:07+00:00): Leuk. Dank je (jullie)
literan (2024-09-19 20:19:03+00:00): но саму линию дорожки не надо было удалять. area:highway это тег для площади дороги, а линия - это ее середина. Без линии не будет роутинга

Верну
Maxiller (2024-09-19 21:07:34+00:00): Как раз хотел проверить на Гармине, когда она выгрузится. Информации о том, как правильно обеспечить роутинг через область с множеством близко расположенных коннектов без рисования кучи звёзд, как-то не особо есть, а по тому, что удалось понять из вики, такое решение представляется рабочим. 
Проверю, если действительно не работает, верну все дорожки на карту.
literan (2024-09-20 06:36:26+00:00): простите, но проверять нет смысла - сто раз проверено на других навигаторах. Так что дорожку я вернул, еще вчера...

роутинг по площадям пока не изобрели
Maxiller (2024-09-20 08:19:45+00:00): Да, действительно. Хотя, математически это весьма тривиальная задача — проще, чем обсчитывать паутину. 
Спасибо за комментарий, дирисую удалённые дорожки.
whb (2024-09-27 11:19:09+00:00): Guten Tag,

"Hinweis auf osm.zz.de" scheint mir keine passende Quelle für die Löschung von vor Ort erfassten Adressen zu sein, welche sogar mit "source:addr=survey" entsprechend kenntlich gemacht wurden:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8592007440/history

Viele Grüße
whb
wies1 (2024-09-27 11:34:49+00:00): Hallo,
danke für den Hinweis. Hatte wohl übersehen, dass Du vorort gewesen warst. Sorry. Sehe, dass du es bereits korrigiert hast
Gruss
wies1
ObscureAngel (2024-09-19 15:21:44+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution !

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to :
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping ! :-)
Alex202210 (2024-09-19 18:13:22+00:00): OK, I will.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-21 00:01:05+00:00): Unnecessary extra ways
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156821887
eggie (2024-09-19 16:53:32+00:00): Je bedoeling is vast goed, maar de adresnodes zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster en dat willen we graag zo houden.

Your intention is okay, but the addressnodes are import from the Dutch Registry.. Better not change addressnodes.
Greetz,
eggie
Cicuta33 (2024-09-20 07:15:46+00:00): Oké. Bedankt!
eggie (2024-09-20 07:22:48+00:00): Hoi Cicuta.. Ik kan het evt voor je terugdraaien in één keer middles een revert. Zeg het maar.

MVG
eggie
Cicuta33 (2024-09-20 07:27:07+00:00): a.u.b. Ik weet nog niet hoe moet dat
eggie (2024-09-20 07:44:49+00:00): No problem.. 
Ik zal het terugdraaien. Dat gaat met een speciale Plugin.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-09-20 07:46:33+00:00): Reverted by changeset #156853845
Cicuta33 (2024-09-20 09:23:16+00:00): 👍
osmviborg (2024-09-19 14:48:25+00:00): Ikke meget brugt, validatoren bryder sig ikke om den. https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/?key=maxstay%3Aconditional&value=yes+%40+%28Mo-Sa+09%3A00-21%3A00%29#overview
Linus W Frische (2024-09-19 14:54:55+00:00): Hvad skal jeg så gøre i stedet?
osmviborg (2024-09-19 15:06:55+00:00): Ingenting. Jeg tror det er tvivlsomt om en data consumer vil bruge et så lidt brugt tag.
Linus W Frische (2024-09-19 15:14:06+00:00): Så jeg skal ikke tilføje maxstay:conditional, selvom det er sådan det er i virkeligheden?
osmviborg (2024-09-19 15:40:51+00:00): Jo jo, gør den endeligt, hvis tilstrækkeligt mange gør brug af, vil det måske med tiden vinde indpas.
Enock4seth (2024-11-29 09:52:45+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. If you are not sure about the meaning of what you are mapping, it is best not to add them. 

Find out more about what OpenStreetMap is and how to get started at https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/
Jrachi (2024-09-19 14:26:30+00:00): Ciao.
Ti sei accorto che continui ad aggiungere il tag waterway=stream su TUTTI i nodi?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-19 14:10:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10804898769

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀