piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
wireguy (2024-01-17 16:10:02+00:00): SDoak, fyi change broke relation 7927046. fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146371641
Sandal man (2024-01-17 08:21:33+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for contributing :-)
But please make smalle change sets, this helps others in tracking changes. 
Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thank you.
emersonveenstra (2024-01-18 13:17:52+00:00): Hi there,

Could you please explain what these are and why they are different from the already existing Zanjero Trails boundaries like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16694534#map=15/33.5226/-112.4656?
happilymappingrway (2024-01-23 22:48:46+00:00): I like the boundaries but I could not see the community name showing on the map. Also, the two Zanjero Trails neighborhoods are separated and therefore I thought it was confusing as compared to other neighborhoods. The Maricopa County Assesor parcel map gives a number in addition to the name  Zanjero Trails. That’s why I added the number to each neighborhood. I hope that makes sense. If I was wrong, I will happily remove the additional marker. Some other popular online maps show neighborhoods that make neighborhoods easier to find for local people needing to get places.
emersonveenstra (2024-01-25 12:52:27+00:00): Okay, that's fine, but it should be a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dneighbourhood not place=suburb
emersonveenstra (2024-02-01 13:00:08+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146945203
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-17 06:55:09+00:00): Добро пожаловать в OSM. Хотелось бы узнать, из какого источника вы взяли добавленные вами адреса улиц? Грэм Фицпатрик
Модератор, Рабочая группа по данным OSMF
___________________________
Welcome to OSM. We have to ask though, what your source is for the street addresses you have added, please? Graeme Fitzpatrick
Moderator, OSMF Data Working Group
elsy1 (2024-01-17 07:26:46+00:00): لطفا لینک یا مدرک معتبر مثل آدرس سایت  معرفی را به عنوان تایید بفرستید تا تایید شود محلی که ثبت کردید واقعی است. تشکر
Mathias_ADAV (2024-03-21 14:16:02+00:00): Salut Thierry,
je viens de voir cette contribution concernant le nom de la liaison .

Si l’itinéraire est jalonné tout le long, on peut créer une relation pour visualiser l’itinéraire.

Redis-moi si tu as des docs à ce sujet.

Mathias
Lamorlaye A Bicyclette VélOOise (2024-03-22 22:38:02+00:00): Hello,
Non l'itinéraire n'est pas jalonné, je l'ai nommé comme ça mais il n'a pas vraiment de nom.
pboscherini (2024-02-14 17:16:22+00:00): Hi,

ok thanks and regards.
Piergiorgio.
Xvtn (2024-01-17 20:00:50+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks like there might be a couple issues here potentially:
- The oneway=yes tag seems incorrect, this looks like a road that allows travel in both directions.
- It seems like the turning circle used to be in place but has been removed when they extended Quail Crossing Blvd.
- I would say the cycleway should be mapped as a separate way. Typically the rule of thumb is physical separation - in this case it looks like some grass or non-paved surface between the road and cycle path.
- It's considered good practice to resolve crossing ways like rivers and roads. Usually this means adding a tunnel or bridge.

I went ahead and fixed that stuff. Feel free to comment here or message me if you disagree with any of my comments or have questions. Thanks for your contributions!!
Spur Cross (2024-01-17 22:26:49+00:00): Xvtn, 
I am new at this and very much welcome the assistance.  I agree with all your observations and corrections. Thank you.
Spur Cross
Spur Cross (2024-01-17 22:29:07+00:00): the crossing ways are all bridges, no tunnels.
Spur Cross
rempshaener (2024-01-17 15:04:54+00:00): Hallo,
wieso hast du das access=no entfernt? Meines Wissens ist die Tiefgarage gesperrt.
Viele Grüße
AndySchulte (2024-01-18 05:53:39+00:00): Hallo rempshaener,

das sollte so nicht sein, sorry. Ich habe es mit Änderungssatz #: 146390658 wieder hinzugefügt.

Danke dir für den Hinweis.

Viele Grüße 
Andy
rempshaener (2024-01-18 14:44:46+00:00): Dankeschön und viele Grüße
mcliquid (2024-01-17 08:14:09+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146349706
mcliquid (2024-01-17 08:14:03+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146349712
橘ヒカリ (2024-01-17 20:59:52+00:00): 您好，车站这个节点的位置是放在站中心或者信号楼上，和所属行政区域无关。目前石港城际线仍在建设中，建成后会更新位置，之后请勿随意更改，谢谢。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146349915
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-01-18 03:57:32+00:00): Này nơi public, anh đừng nên vẽ như thế nhé. cám ơn anh.
mcliquid (2024-01-17 09:58:54+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
rajdhani (2024-01-17 10:27:09+00:00): Hello Sir, I am very thankful for your valuable feedback. By mistake this edit are done in same task.
DomiAr (2024-01-23 10:12:12+00:00): Hi mcliquid,
I mentioned that in other comment, but worth to say here as well that I addressed issue with this type of edits in my team. Mapper worked in POL roads challenge, while jumped to CAN to fix small error in and upload all edits in big change set, as above. We retrained our team to be careful for limited change sets reflecting logical edits grouped and we will improve for the future. Thank you once again, feel free to contact us and me directly, if you see anything, we can do better for OSM. More than happy to learn from you, regards! 
Domi
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-17 08:00:22+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1240376301

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-01-17 07:56:30+00:00): Failed to create changeset: HTTPError(400, ChangesetTag [146350843, "comment"]: v: is too long (maximum is 255 characters) ("Restoring version 2 of way 577954839, version 1 of way 561922628, version 1 of way 577954835, version 1 of way 577954834, version 1 of way 577954833, version 1 of way 577954836, version 1 of way 577958258, version 1 of way 577958257, version 1 of way 577958256, version 1 of way 577958259, version 1 of way 561922624, version 1 of way 577954838, version 1 of way 577954837, version 3 of way 561922629, version 1 of node 5417746780"))

* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146351117
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146351148
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146351162
MxxCon (2024-01-19 20:56:45+00:00): Hello.
Please do not map sidewalks as a single loop around the whole block. Please split them at each corner as appropriate. Just like you don't map roads as a single loop around the whole block, so shouldn't do that with sidewalks.
Properly splitting them allows independent tagging of each sidewalk's situation without affecting the unrelated streets.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146351924
bxl-forever (2024-01-18 17:42:36+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour les changements mais quelques questions quand même.  Comme vous vous présentez comme le compte officiel de cartographie de l’ULB nous allons supposer que vous êtes des experts en cartographie, aptes à comprendre ceci :

1) Pourquoi les contours de ces bâtiments ne sont pas tracés sur UrbisAdm ?  On dirait que vous les avez dessinés sur photos aériennes et il y a de grosses différences de formes.  Comment expliquer ce choix ?

2) Pourquoi garder la référence UrbIS sur celui-ci en lui donnant une autre forme ?  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121794864  Ça invalide la coordination entre les données UrbIS et OSM.  Avez-vous reçu des données spéciales d’UrbIS avec d’autres numéros ?  Nous n’avons pas retrouvé ces données dans la dernière version connue.

Have a nice day.
ULB Plans (2024-01-19 14:38:13+00:00): Bonjour, 
Je ne suis pas cartographe, mais j'essaie de rendre accessible les infos de mobilité et de tenir les cartes openstreetmap à jour. Effectivement, j'avais dessiner les polygones sur base des photos aériennes, mais je comprends de votre message qu'il vaut mieux se baser sur les fonds de plan UrbisAdm. Je corrige les infos. Un grand merci pour votre input qui permet d'améliorer la carte. Bonne journée également
LySioS (2024-01-17 21:06:38+00:00): Bonjour,

Le tracé de cette impasse était déjà existant, j'ai donc reporté les informations que vous avez ajoutées sur le segment concerné.

Merci
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146352558
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-17 09:10:22+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361324841

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Ewen Hill (2024-01-17 12:29:40+00:00): Hi Cobba, please do not remove other people's edits unless you are comfortable that they no longer exist. If they don't exist, please identify how you know that they no longer exist. If you are going to delete significant amounts, it's always best to contact the original editor first. Thanks for understanding.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146354052
nevw (2024-01-17 13:59:11+00:00): Hi, you have missed a section of this road at the Clunes end that needs correction
LySioS (2024-08-03 11:06:50+00:00): Bonjour,

pourquoi avoir changé le tag initial ? il me parait plus approprié que l'actuel.

Ce n'est qu'une pompe et pas une station de réparation. La page amenity=compressed_air du wiki correspond et comporte même une photo du même modèle de pompe.
GeoMechain (2024-08-04 12:08:25+00:00): Bonjour,

Je ne sais plus exactement ce qui m'a motivé dans ce changement à l'époque, peut être pour éclaircir que c'est une pompe qui ne pourrait probablement pas servir pour autre chose qu'un vélo.

Je peut refaire la bascule et vérifier si je n'avais pas fait de changement similaire sur d'autres points

Merci !
LySioS (2024-08-04 18:33:53+00:00): Techniquement, on peut y gonfler même un pneu de voiture, quitte à stationner illégalement.

Étant donné que c'est plus une pompe qu'un atelier de réparation, je pencherai plus pour amenity=compressed_air + bicycle=designated
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-17 09:20:18+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1093456836

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
granpasso811 (2024-01-17 15:05:35+00:00): Scusa, esisteva una relazione con il percorso del sentiero "tre cerchi gialli" (che ho percorso personalmente) e il tag osmc:symbol compilato; ora l'hai cancellata e sostituita con una senza quel tag e di tipo "proposed" col risultato che apparentemente questo sentiero non esiste più. Qual è lo scopo di tutto ciò, peggiorare la mappa?
Saluti
dieterdreist-CAI (2024-01-17 19:19:31+00:00): Buonasera granpasso,

è vero che ho cancellato quella relazione in quanto si trattava di un duplicato, quindi ho mantenuto la relazione del sentiero più vecchio, perché nella logica la relazione creata dopo è il doppione. Entrambe le relazioni avevano il ref e ref regionale uguale. Non ho cancellato l’informazione del simbolo, nella relazione duplicato il tag symbol:it era "tre cerchi gialli disposti in linea” e nella relazione mantenuta "tre cerchi gialli in linea” (ora ho ripristinato anche la parola “disposti”).

Ho adesso rimosso “state=proposed” perché come dici tu e il tagging, è segnalata con tre cerchi gialli. Questo ammetto era una svista, anche perché mi devo abituare a questo tag “state” che non avevo mai visto (e che penso sia un po’ un troll tag. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Trolltag )
saluti,Martin
Ewen Hill (2024-01-17 12:33:32+00:00): Hi Cobba, I have reverted this changeset as the railway is either abandoned or razed due to the first section being removed. There are very few disused lines in Victoria.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146354350
NeisBot (2024-01-18 00:31:04+00:00): Hi Ryblix 👋

your recent changeset has been marked due to a temporary or permanent block from further map edits. 

If you have any questions or if there's anything you'd like to discuss regarding the mapping, feel free to reach out! 

Best regards, 🤖

Details https://osm.org/user_blocks/15585
#ContributorHasBeenBlocked
Enock4seth (2024-07-03 19:20:29+00:00): Hi,
I am not sure what you are trying to map here but watch out not to add island ways.
KwandoRiver (2024-07-08 10:32:32+00:00): Hello there, thanks for the valued feedback. After reviewing the area I see that an untagged way was unintentionally added. I will be mindful not to do so in the future. Have a nice day!
Ewen Hill (2024-01-17 12:06:22+00:00): Hi Cobba, the line is either abandoned or razed (probably the latter). Please do not upgrade the line to disused to show the railway. If you want to see it, use https://www.openrailwaymap.org/ however we need to map what is on the ground. Thanks for your understanding. Ewen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146354518
Thierry1030 (2024-05-15 19:54:06+00:00): hello, you changed the road situation at Rue de Bois-Bourdon ... can you check this note if it's compatible with you mapped? Thanks
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3044819
Thierry1030 (2024-05-16 23:50:48+00:00): ...
pio2_122 (2024-01-17 10:29:04+00:00): Minironda z przejezdną wysepką oznacza się tagiem highway=mini_roundabout na skrzyżowaniu dróg, nie rozrysowuje się ich jak „zwykłych” rond: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway=mini%20roundabout?uselang=pl

Były one prawidłowo oznaczone. Wycofałem rozrysowanie.
Warin61 (2024-04-24 02:14:43+00:00): Hi,
via_ferrata is not a 'sport' but a path of some length. It does have problems... See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dvia_ferrata

And I'd tagged with access=private or access=customers...
mavl (2024-01-17 12:39:05+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 146279324, 146353146.
archie (2024-01-17 10:05:12+00:00): Hej, stigarna som du raderade var uppmärkta som "private" resp "destination" som klart anger att det rör sig om vägar som är privata och inte får användas av allmänheten. 
Varför raderade du ändå vägarna/stigarna?
Anna Fäldt (2024-01-17 12:10:10+00:00): Då folk inte visar någon som helst hänsyn och går rakt över våra tomter, struntar i att dom är på er site är utmärkta som privat, utan hänvisar till att dom finns uppmärkta på siten. För mig är det helt obegripligt att det överhuvudtaget har markerats stigar på vår privata tomt. Där av vill vi omedelbart få bort detta///Anna
archie (2024-01-17 12:40:18+00:00): Jag förstår din vrede om folk inte respekterar allemansrätten och strövar nära din bostad. Men det är något du inte kan lasta openstreetmap för. Stigarna har ritats in och märkts upp med omsorg av en erfaren mappare med data från öppna källor. 
Om folk trots att stigar och parkeringsplatsen m m märkts upp som privat kliver in på din privata sfär får du ta upp det med dem istället för att radera data från openstreetmap. De lär göra så helt oberoende om stigarna finns i openstreetmap eller inte. 
Eftersom stigarna m m inte är behäftade med fel i sig kommer jag att återställa de raderade data. Jag ber dig om att avstå från att på nytt radera data. Det du har anfört berättigar på inget sätt att förstöra data på  openstreetmap. 
Så som vi som skapar openstreetmap förstår din indignation över intrånget i din privata sfär, förstår du säkert vår ilska över att du förstör data som vi skapar på openstreetmap.
kapazao (2024-01-17 10:32:07+00:00): Hola, si desconoces información sobre las líneas eléctricas es mejor que las pongas como de media tensión, ya que la mayoría de las líneas de alta tensión ya han sido añadidas.
Por otra parte puedes revisar el etiquetado de las líneas eléctricas en la wiki de OSM.
Un saludo
eggie (2024-01-17 10:28:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  niet name=Start MTB Sleen section1  gebruiken op een wegelement als het niet de straatnaam is.
De naam van de MTB route staat op de routerelatie met MTB-route Sleenerzand.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-01-17 10:31:56+00:00): name=Wallride  zal ook niets doen in OSM.
Wanneer hier bv een informatiebord staat zou je tourim=information met information= board kunnen bijtaggen.
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:information%3Dboard

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146355275

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-17 10:58:06+00:00): name Wallride  verwijderd. 
Start aangepast naar description.
MVG
eggie
wambacher (2024-01-18 14:40:56+00:00): Hi, ist die Friedrichstraße die neue Adresse, dann muß man den Knoten auch an die richtige Stelle verschieben. Nur die Daten ändern, reicht nicht.
mcliquid (2024-01-17 15:00:48+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
rajdhani (2024-01-17 17:29:38+00:00): Hello Sir, As per your previous comment I made changes with single location. thank you for your valuable feedback.
DomiAr (2024-01-23 10:06:11+00:00): Hi mcliquid,
thanks to your feedback, I addressed issue with this type of edits in my team. Mapper worked in POL roads challenge, while jumped to CAN to fix small error in and upload all edits in big change set, as above. We retrained our team to be careful for limited change sets reflecting logical edits grouped and we will improve for the future. Thank you once again, feel free to contact us and me directly if you see anything, we can do better for OSM. More than happy to learn from you, regards! 
Domi
eggie (2024-01-17 10:37:14+00:00): Dag Jordi  Je kunt met editor iD geen busrouterelaties aanpassen.
Dat kan alleen met editor josm..
maar kennelijk is het hier wel goed gegaan, wan de routes zijn nog intact.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146356373

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-17 10:40:51+00:00): De routering wordt niet anders afgehandeld wanneer je residential aanpast naar unclassified.
residential was hier de goede tagging wanneer het een straat is met bewoning.

MVG
eggie
hlfan (2024-07-09 10:15:02+00:00): Was sagst du? https://www.asfinag.at/verkehr-sicherheit/webcams/?id=S016_060%2C950_0_00079845 schaut mir recht nach einer wiedererrichteten Brücke aus.
mcliquid (2024-07-09 10:38:13+00:00): Wiederrichtet ja, fahrbar nein :)
ÖAMTC sagt noch bis 22.07.:
https://youngandmobile.oeamtc.at/verkehrsservice/

"L92	Bingser Dorfstraße, L97 Richtung Stallehr	zwischen S16, Bings und Stallehr gesperrt, Baustelle, von 08.01.2024 08:00 Uhr bis 22.07.2024 17:00 Uhr"
Xvtn (2024-01-24 15:58:33+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contribution. Since you requested a review, I looked over your changeset. Looks good!
eggie (2024-01-17 10:44:29+00:00): Wanneer je routerelaties wil bewerken gebruik dan editor JOSM.
 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047 

 Die kan wel met relaties omgaan. 

MVG
eggie
JordidB (2024-01-17 11:15:50+00:00): Dankjewel voor de tip
Ik zal kijken of het daarmee goed gaat. 
MVG
eggie (2024-01-17 11:49:51+00:00): Het probleem zit in het knippen met iD.. 
De volgorde in de relatie gaat verloren....
maar de routevolgorde klopte nog steeds.
Een enkele keer gaat het dan goed.. of een medemapper heeft al weer gesorteerd.

Mapse..
eggie
Константин Гам (2024-03-15 10:06:18+00:00): Сданы??? Вчера они были огорожены заборами и визуально совсем не выглядят жилыми.
Ado☆Tirol (2024-01-17 17:56:47+00:00): Finally done!
Marek-M (2024-01-17 11:54:55+00:00): Cześć, zauważyłem, że dodajesz nadmiarowe węzły na prostych odcinkach drogi (np. w pobliżu tego skrzyżowania https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1846174076 ) - jest to niezalecane wg wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki#Zachowaj_proste_linie_prosto

Takie dodatkowe punkty utrudniają utrzymanie prostej linii na drogach i bywają źródłem błędów, gdy ktoś takich punktów nie zauważy podczas edycji.

Na tym skrzyżowaniu są 4 węzły, które niepotrzebnie dodałeś:
https://i.imgur.com/JHEtEmV.png

W okolicy widziałem inne skrzyżowania z podobnymi nadmiarowymi węzłami - proszę trzymaj się zasad przy kolejnych edycjach a ostatnie zmiany możesz zweryfikować i poprawić jak masz możliwość.
Jerry_W2k (2024-01-17 12:16:36+00:00): Cześć! 
Nadmiarowe węzły wynikły z przeniesienia ("odklejenia") punktu sygnalizacji świetlnej do miejsca zatrzymania się pojazdu.

https://imgur.com/a/UgSGRwT

W miejsce starego punktu z sygnalizacją został punkt na drodze, który nic nie wnosi. 

Za moment usunę
Marek-M (2024-01-17 12:22:50+00:00): Ok, dzięki za info. Dobrze, że zweryfikowałeś źródło takich punktów - teraz będzie łatwiej pilnować aby te nowo utworzone węzły przez iD od razu usuwać :)
Jerry_W2k (2024-01-17 12:24:42+00:00): Ogólnie z jakiego narzędzia korzystasz, że wyłapujesz tak szybko czyjeś błędy? JOSM ma jakiś plugin? W OSMCha sprawdzasz?