piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ebadmsg (2024-05-08 09:15:09+00:00): My bad, i did'nt see your modif/comment on my last modif
for now on i'll make real rectangle and put all the tags
Thank you
5m4u9 (2024-05-09 05:32:23+00:00): Hmm... creo que por más que diga SRL no deberíamos añadir eso sabiendo lo que representa, quizá en el operator.
Senihtu (2024-10-07 10:16:59+00:00): Hi!
Diese Änderungen unterbrechen Relation 17219842 / Veckerhagen Rundweg 7.
Wenn es das gelöschte Wegstück nicht mehr gibt: hast Du eine Ahnung, wo der Wanderweg jetzt lang geht - oder ob es ihn überhaupt noch gibt?
Vaidotas (2024-05-09 15:53:20+00:00): Ar planuojamos Edinburgo g. vietoje žvyrkelis pradingo? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/212251471
Planuojamą ir esamą situacijas tikriausiai reiktų pažymėti atskiromis linijomis.
Audrius Pak (2024-05-09 16:25:06+00:00): Ten šiuo metu vyksta statybos ir nežinau ar tas kelias asfaltuojamas, ar pritaikomas važinėti sunkiasvoriui transportui į šalia esančias daugiabučių statybas. Kolkas dar nelabai aiški ir trajektorija. Pakeitus į "proposed" navigacija nebeturėtų vesti per jį.
alessandrocarmeli (2024-07-20 16:39:26+00:00): the key "fixme" is used to report problems, not for detail.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-23 16:23:28+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11887504380/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
risturiz (2025-04-24 02:18:42+00:00): Done! Thanks!
Baloo Uriza (2024-06-14 13:44:10+00:00): The StreetComplete app can help with address collection immensely... just needs the buildings to be mapped for it to start asking questions about the buildings (including addresses).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151026925
WestQuester (2024-06-14 14:03:27+00:00): Excellent suggestion, I was unaware of that. Thank you!
Frans S (2024-05-08 14:43:00+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped. Quality preveals above Quantity!
Buildings not squared. 
Connected nodes of buildings to other features like highways and other buildings
Included a yard into mappings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151027053
Frans S (2024-05-08 16:46:19+00:00): Hi, In addition to my message I want you to see the modifications I had to made. 
Open this webpage:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151062619
Red lined objects a. re my modifications.
In a number of times you mapped empty pieces of ground or a courtyard.
For a beginner mapper is this task a bit to difficult. Look after easier task if I might advise you.
Best regards
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-28 22:56:02+00:00): You disconnected roads here and created a bit of a mess.  I have since gone through and fixed it.
rowcherryrow (2024-05-07 20:30:32+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery
eggie (2024-05-08 06:09:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Er  verschijnen hier stranden die er in welkelijkheid niet zijn.
Dit lijkt verdacht veel op Pokemon edits. Zou jij dit nader willen verklaren. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-05-08 06:16:19+00:00): reverted due to pokemonedits by changeset #151038251
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-11 10:29:06+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151028002
eggie (2024-05-08 06:14:35+00:00): reverted by changeset #151038228
eggie (2024-05-08 06:19:37+00:00): Svp niet aan de rivieroevers komen als startende mapper.
De rivier staat leeg voordat je het weet. Het zijn alemaal multipolygonen. 
 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-08 08:02:27+00:00): Wanneer je zand op water gaat tekenen zal water altijd boven liggen. Je zult er niets van zien. 
Dit gaat alleen met de nodige ervaring in mappen en met editor JOSM.
Probeer eerst ervaring op te doen met mappen in eenvoudige situaties voordat je je gaat stoeien met de kustlijn en onbedoeld allemaal polygonen elkaar laat kruisen. Het resultaat zal een rivier zonder water zijn. Als voorbeeld heb ik een strandje ingetekend dat je wel ziet. 
Paar keer CTRL-F5 voor het effect.
En ga svp niet zomaar strandjes intekenen. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-08 06:13:51+00:00): reverted by changeset #151038205
eggie (2024-05-08 06:17:37+00:00): Svp als startende mapper niet aan de rivieroevers komen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-08 06:12:20+00:00): natuaral beach verwijderd
eggie (2024-05-08 06:22:29+00:00): Onlythesoul
Ga je hier naar het strand?
Pokemonedits liggen onder een vergrootglas.
Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits.  
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen.  

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-08 05:38:11+00:00): Hi GG 


There is an issue with the routerelation, S 109

Editor iD is not suited to handle routerelations.
The cycleway is okay and foot=use_sidepath also.
Greetz
eggie
eggie (2024-05-08 05:49:23+00:00): No cycleconnection with the Herman Gorterstraat from the western cycleway?

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-05-08 05:59:57+00:00): Fixed routerelation S 109
szydzio (2024-05-08 19:16:20+00:00): Cześć!
Dzięki, że uzupełniłeś szczegóły terenu nad Zalewem, ale mam wątpliwości co do tych dwóch plaż które oznaczyłeś np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1280701701
W terenie wygląda to tak (zdjęcie z ostatniej majówki) => https://i.ibb.co/N9Yt5hM/IMG20240501153450.jpg
Na prawdę uważasz że to się kwalifikuje jako plaża ?
Pozdr!
grelus (2024-05-08 19:47:04+00:00): Heh, też tam byłem tuż przed majówką. Może faktycznie zbyt się zasugerowałem zdjęciami z orty. Zapewne w zależności od poziomu zalewu trochę piachu się pokazuje. Zmienię na trawę. Będzie bardziej realne.
szydzio (2024-05-08 20:56:47+00:00): 👍
eggie (2024-05-08 05:40:04+00:00): Seems okay
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-07 21:00:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/517073476

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-10 16:56:50+00:00): poprawiono - usunięto tag "addr:place"
mikedld (2024-05-17 02:27:08+00:00): [At least] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8105019897 got moved in this changeset. Previous location was its true (or much closer to true) location underground, new location is instead somewhere near the one of the entrances and doesn't reflect its true location. Do you not want me to move underground chargers in the future?
mikedld (2024-05-17 03:11:26+00:00): Positions of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8308985789 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8308727705 are now also incorrect (or much less correct). Not sure if you care, let me know.
Alexmol (2024-05-17 06:50:45+00:00): Hi.
My sincere apologies, I didnt realize someone had moved the points to the correct location.
Please go ahead and correct the location of any charging point, any help is apreciated.
The position of new charging points given by the operators is more often than not inacurate.
BTW: Do you know if all underground parking branded with Empark are now telpark ?

Best Regards
Alexandre
mikedld (2024-05-18 01:29:57+00:00): Reverted the locations in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151474753. Thanks for the prompt reply ;)

As for the parkings, after a discussion in Telegram I'm currently tagging them with brand=Telpark + operator=Empark (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Mikedld/Portugal/Estacionamento/Operadores/Empark). Could discuss more if there's uncertainty.
JassKurn (2024-05-09 00:50:51+00:00): Hello Eduardino_the_thirth,

You made errors with you first edit in OpenStreetMap. May have been to do with map.me? I reverted the changeset and no harm is done

The camp sites you added do not exist (as defined by OpenStreetMap) and the waterfall / attraction is already mapped. Don't put this off adding more info to OpenStreetMap

Thanks, Jass

The changeset I used to do the revert is linked below.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151079762#map=12/50.5733/-3.8242
Dimitar155 (2024-05-07 21:15:36+00:00): https://www.sofiatraffic.bg/bg/transport/routeChanges/2639
SafwatHalaby (2025-04-21 06:10:59+00:00): Relevant discussion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158183947
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-08 04:59:12+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151036358
silversurfer83 (2024-05-08 23:41:36+00:00): Hi :)

nach meiner Begrüßung per DM hier auch eine Anmerkung an einer Änderung:

bisher hast du meist gute Kommentare hinterlassen. "xx" ist jedoch kein hilfreicher Kommentar. Bitte schau mal diese Erklärung an und achte ein wenig darauf, dass auch Andere verstehen, was du hier gerade tust :)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151029988
jayhawker6 (2024-05-07 21:54:55+00:00): Is residential the correct highway tag here? It does not appear to be a residential road based on the imagery. If anything this would be highway=track.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151030038
Gazer75 (2024-05-12 08:20:21+00:00): Did they open the old rail tunnel again now? I've seen nothing in the news or on BaneNOR website about it.
Gazer75 (2024-05-12 08:29:06+00:00): So all I found was a Bergens Tidende article behind a paywall, so I guess its open?
silversurfer83 (2024-05-08 23:44:04+00:00): Hi :)

wenn es einfach nur ein Dach ohne Wände (außer der einen Außenwand der Hütte) ist, dann ist dies ein "building=roof".
Details: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Droof

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151030200
Kersti Nebelsiek (2024-05-15 17:42:22+00:00): Es geht hier genau darum, etwas das als Unterstand mit Bank und informationsschild für wanderer gedacht ist auch als solchen zu kennzeichnen und in der Fahrradkarte sichtbar zu machen.
silversurfer83 (2024-05-15 18:19:52+00:00): Das nennt sich "tagging für den Renderer" und ist nicht erwünscht.
Auf den Bildern, die du verlinkt hast, ist klar zu erkennen, dass es nur ein Dach ist und das sollte auch so gekennzeichnet werden. Da du es auch als Unterstand (shelter) gekennzeichnet hast (was ja korrekt sein kann) sollte es auf üblichen Karten angezeigt werden.
Aber nur um etwas in einer ganz bestimmten Karte dargestellt zu haben geben wir bitte keine falschen Eigenschaften ein.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer
infeeeee (2024-05-08 13:05:00+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

A BuildingTools plugint ismered? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools

Egymás melletti épületek általában párhuzamosak egymással. Ezzel a pluginnal ha kijelölsz egy épületet, a következőt vele párhuzamosan fogja rajzolni.

Nagyon jó amit csinálsz amúgy, így tovább!

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
claudiopereira (2024-06-16 02:56:52+00:00): Bom dia,
Reparei que existem alguns detalhes menores na sua contribuição. Por exemplo, aparenta ter fundido uma paragem de autocarro com o canto de um edifício (sendo que ainda distam um pouco) apagando a que anteriormente existia.

Olhando para a alteração a sua conta, concluo que é uma editora nova a utilizar o editor no navegador. Existem alguns nuances neste editor que por vezes enganam. É normal. Não considere esta mensagem um sermão; ninguém nasce ensinado.

Com isto dito, informo que existe um canal de Telegram com a comunidade portuguesa onde pode tirar qualquer dúvida ou pedir por ajuda: https://t.me/OSMPortugal

Também existem workshops (online) onde pode aprender de uma forma mais guiada. Segundos sábados do mês. Indique caso tenha interesse.
jayhawker6 (2024-05-07 22:19:39+00:00): Some of these buildings are mapped extremely thin. I also think you should take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dterrace
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151030651
BlueButterfly (2024-05-07 22:21:47+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Mapillary
eggie (2024-05-08 05:42:39+00:00): added sidewalk right iso yes.
eggie (2024-05-08 05:45:48+00:00): removed bicycle=yes from cycleway.. (default)
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 06:07:38+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151403014
NiedernhausenerJunge (2024-08-03 23:34:01+00:00): Als ich letzten Monat zum letzten Mal in Niedernhausen war, war die Ampel in der Platter Straße definitiv noch vorhanden.
Mah (2024-08-07 16:59:26+00:00): Ich verstehe deine Aussage nicht, die Ampelquerung ist doch noch da.
highway ist nur auf "crossing" gesetzt, da es keine Ampel zur Regelung des Autoverkehrs ist, sondern den Fußgängern/Schülern das einfache Überqueren ermöglichen soll.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 06:08:06+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151403035
MapMagics (2024-05-08 18:15:00+00:00): Correction: Source used was Bing aerial imagery; Bing Streetside.
MxxCon (2024-05-09 05:07:48+00:00): NextDoor is the gossiping website. You mean EveryDoor. 😉
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151031288
IraGersh (2024-05-09 17:44:14+00:00): Definitely.  not NextDoor.  I started using EveryDoor, but even that isn't fast enough.  Took a lot of photos on Berry open street yesterday, briefly checking with EveryDoor and it looked like all the open street things had not been mapped.
Violaine_Do (2024-11-29 23:30:34+00:00): please refer to other comments about aligning imagery first
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151031315
drandjelovic (2024-05-08 05:42:28+00:00): Hi Branko 

Please give a look carefully and on location on page 

https://www.mojsvetns.com/location/

Is clearly address is in Novi Sad , not a Belgrade. 
If you have other information please share with us
BrackoNe (2024-05-08 13:48:48+00:00): Hello, I've been yesterday and the shown location was in Belgrade (didn't check today). However, I'm positive that I have added correct location in OSM.
BrackoNe (2024-05-08 13:51:13+00:00): Pin still shows location in Belgrade.
Here's print screen:
https://prnt.sc/IwZscRmvhgeN
drandjelovic (2024-05-08 13:57:36+00:00): Hi

The pin is not correct and is not showing the right position on Google Maps which is used like API on web site. 
This is the location on Google Maps 

google.com/maps/place/Dnevni+dečiji+boravak+Moj+Svet+NS+-+Centar+za+edukaciju+i+unapređenje+učenja+-+Novi+Sad+-+produzeni+boravak+za+decu/@45.2552057,19.8036982,20.63z/data=!4m14!1m7!3m6!1s0x475b11c9ea7420b1:0x69a6b494d97b0f89!2s28,+Bulevar+Slobodana+Jovanovića+18+,+21000,+Novi+Sad+21000,+Serbia!3b1!8m2!3d45.2540748!4d19.8039849!3m5!

The same location is on the website, please clear a cash of your browser or open it in incognito mode and open link again 

https://www.mojsvetns.com/location/
drandjelovic (2024-05-08 14:04:53+00:00): This is how is correct 

https://prnt.sc/nBEfrZvQ_7Se

and screenshot of google maps 

https://prnt.sc/11owJIgyz5h1

is a problem with your browser. Please double check before screenshot
BrackoNe (2024-05-08 15:09:17+00:00): I have tried from two different browsers on my phone and on laptop.  I believe the root cause of this problem is that you have provided just the street name and street number, not the city, so since Belgrade is closer to me, it shows me the location in Belgrade.

Anyways, it is irrelevant for this edit. I have added it correctly in OSM.

Cheers,
Bračko
Msiipola (2024-05-08 09:46:47+00:00): Hej!
Alla byggnader du adderat är felpositionerade.

Exempelvis: https://postimg.cc/hfCZQtqM

Detta pga. att bakgrunden ESRI du använder, inte är positionskalibrerad. Alla satellitbakgrunder har ett positionsfel! Med ESRI ser det ut att vara rätt, men är fel i verkligheten.

För att kalibrera bakgrunden gör följande:
Positionskalibrering OSM-webbeditor (ID)

- Starta OSM (https://www.openstreetmap.org)
- Välj "Redigera" i toppmeny.
- I höger kant öppna inställningar för "Kartdata".
- Avmarkera allt under "Datalager". Nu ska endast bakgrundsbild visas.
- I höger kant öppna inställningar för "Bakgrund".
- Under "Bakgrunder" välj önskad källa för bakgrund.
- Under "Bakgrunder/Bildlager" välj "Trafikverkets vägnätverk". 
- Nu ska vägar bli ritade.
- Dra och zoom:a in på en rondell eller större korsning.
- Om markerade vägar inte överensstämmer med bakgrundsbilden måste man göra korrigering:
	- Under Bakgrund/Bildkompensation, dra i de grå fälten så att bild och vägar matchar.
- Avmarkera "Trafikverkets vägnätverk" eller behåll som referens.
- I höger kant öppna inställningar för "Kartdata" igen, och markera "OpenStreetMap-data".
Andreas_89 (2024-05-08 14:45:22+00:00): Hej!
Jo jag såg det, de flesta husen och gatorna i Jäderfors har inte jag gjort dock. Jag har justerat en del som andra gjort men inte allt. En del har jag säkert lagt fel också. Men jag justerar det mesta nu.
Msiipola (2024-05-08 15:10:00+00:00): Ok, jag kollade inte historiken såg noga. Såg ditt usernamn på några byggnader och drog något förhastade slutsatser av det. Ber om ursäkt för det.
Förhoppningsvis har du ändå nytta av instruktionen jag gav.
Andreas_89 (2024-05-08 15:20:00+00:00): Absolut. Det var ju du som lärde mig om att positionsjustera här för någon månad sedan. Så jag kommer nog att få gå tillbaka på alla byggnader jag gjort på andra ställen i landet och justera undan för undan. Men det kommer ju att ta en stund. =)
user1572739 (2024-05-08 03:24:08+00:00): Hallo! Berresgasse, nicht Berresstraße. Und warum hast du über die bereits bestehende "construction"-Fläche noch eine mit "brownfield" (was in diesem Fall nicht richtig ist) drübergesetzt, statt erstere ggf. einfach anzupassen?
PcMouse1 (2024-05-07 23:19:44+00:00): Hello Joy Esther,
Your edits look good but I strongly suggest connecting roads to other nearby roads to allow GPS routing. 
Happy Mapping!
HellMap (2024-05-08 18:37:02+00:00): Hi!

I am assuming the "parking lot" has "tikai ar atļaujām" sign? In the OSM sense, this is not `access=permit`, but just `access=private`. Permit implies that anyone from the public could get a permit. But in a location like this, it is highly unlikely they would issue permits to everyone, even if they don't study or live here.
markalex- (2024-05-09 23:23:35+00:00): It has 523, with "Izņemot ar RTK atļaujām".
After reading what the `access=permit` means I agree. 
Thanks for clarification and guidance.
csimeona22 (2024-05-08 17:28:51+00:00): Correction: Source used was Bing aerial imagery, Mapillary.
Violaine_Do (2024-11-29 23:31:04+00:00): please refer to other comments about aligning imagery first
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151033279
eggie (2024-05-08 14:16:45+00:00): Dag antoon.

Ik heb AH samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
Je hoeft geen adressen aan te maken. 
Let goed op dat je geen bestaande adressen verwijderd, maar alleen de bedrijfsinfo. 
MVG
eggie
Violaine_Do (2024-11-29 23:31:08+00:00): please refer to other comments about aligning imagery first
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151033361
Glassman (2024-05-08 19:46:49+00:00): The road you added looks more like a driveway. Can you review this edit and correct as needed?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151033516
nevw (2024-05-08 04:32:17+00:00): no garage evident on satellite imagery
akimapbuilder (2024-05-08 06:20:46+00:00): This is a non-existent building.
I will revert it, thanks!
citrula (2024-05-10 05:30:33+00:00): looks good, thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151033990
tekim (2024-05-08 17:42:13+00:00): reverting fake edit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151068320
Jorge Calvario (2024-05-08 16:18:50+00:00): No se ve reflejado aun en los mapas
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-11 10:26:37+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Thank you for adding details and ungluing land use. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151035127
zstadler (2024-05-08 10:07:19+00:00): שלום בתיה!

תודה על תרומתך למיפוי של 
OSM
ו
Israel Hiking Map.

התאור שהוספת לקיבוץ רמת השופט לא מתאים לכללי המיפוי של הפרוייקטים.

התאור אמור להיות ממוקד במאפיינים העיקריים של המקום או האתר. כמו כן, לא מקובל גם לתעד נושאים אישיים כגון "ההורים שלי".

בברכה,
זאב
真中あお (2024-05-08 20:29:35+00:00): 首先，欢迎萌新！
我看到你的编辑，需要指出，你的这个编辑存在问题，我已经将有问题的部分撤回了。
首先，你在成都误判了地图数据与影像上的建筑的对应关系，删除了客观存在的建筑。
再者，你大概是把建筑和影像上的屋顶对齐了吧？这个做法不对。正确的对齐方式是，先沿着屋檐描好建筑平面形状，然后移动这个形状，将其与影像上建筑立面的下沿（立面与地面交接的地方）对齐。
另外，十米以下的偏差其实不用管，因为卫星照片的精度问题，每一份卫星地图上建筑的位置都略有不一样。在编辑时可以迁就现有数据，在菜单里调整卫星图像的偏移量。
Glassman (2024-05-08 19:48:51+00:00): #TIP: square the houses by selecting the outline then just type a "q" to make them look professional.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151035876
Frans S (2024-05-09 13:17:17+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Clustered buildings.
Inaccurate mapped
Buildings not squared/

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151036078
archpdx (2024-05-08 05:11:36+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for adding these addresses. Please note however that we don't abbreviate street names in OSM, including directional prefixes (see https://osm.wiki/abbreviation)
sr-71 (2024-05-08 06:11:46+00:00): This is not an abbreviation, the city of Newberg lists the street names as "N", they do not spell it all the way out. Spelling it all the way out is actually incorrect and sometimes leads to mailing issues.
archpdx (2024-05-08 07:03:30+00:00): The same can be said for almost every street in the US, spelling out street names is just one of OSM's conventions. This allows for data consumers such as renderers and routers to choose whether or not to abbreviate them.