piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
fortera_au (2023-12-12 09:26:50+00:00): You’d made enough of a change to show that you’d made several ways, which means you’re making changes to intersections without actually looking at them. I’d recommend at least seeing what aerial imagery shows when making that much of a change
fortera_au (2023-12-12 09:28:18+00:00): And by engaging in changeset comments constructively, you can say that if that’s the case
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-12 09:38:00+00:00): > yeah the part that you dont get is that I never split the roads

http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=145018824 shows that you split way in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1230460423 area

changes you made in OSM are public
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-12 09:40:45+00:00): based on this discussion this road split was unintentional

therefore I reverted this edit in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145029853

> I have brought your comment to the attention of the DWG

no idea why
slice0 (2023-12-12 09:41:21+00:00): that was a routing edit, I made it so you couldnt do a u-turn either side of that island thing. I didnt create that island is was already there
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-12 09:58:23+00:00): Yep, you are right about not creating island.

I removed in subsequent https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145030473 based on aerial imagery and comments here
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-12 09:59:47+00:00): is anything requiring followup?
slice0 (2023-12-12 14:41:01+00:00): no thats all thankyou, after forteras rant about splitting the roads fortera has gone ahead and split the roads now. So it was a baseless argument to begin with sorry for bringing you into it. and I hope it doesnt happen again
fortera_au (2023-12-12 18:50:10+00:00): Where have I split the roads? The road is split south of Ames Drive, and already was split, and north I actually merged a series of sections mapped as dual carriageway that aren’t.
slice0 (2023-12-12 21:33:17+00:00): where did I split the road? you started this by commenting on my changeset and you were wrong
fortera_au (2023-12-12 21:36:02+00:00): You said "fortera has gone ahead and split the roads now." I was asking where I had done that.

I apologise for the mistake, it appeared that you had with the new ways you created, which is why I asked. If you had said you hadn't first up, I would have gone and double checked straight away and just fixed that section instead.
pantufla (2023-12-18 15:12:31+00:00): Hello, please don't rush to add features you aren´t sure of. This gate doesnt exist in this location.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6883092440
MountFrissell (2023-12-19 16:20:54+00:00): Hello pantufla, upon returning to this area I can see there are several of these markings along this way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/734924466). These do not all appear to be gates, I can update the barrier=gate tags. Thank you and have a nice day.
Benoît C MdP (2023-12-12 08:03:15+00:00): Merci pour ta contribution. La bande à  contresens était bien renseignée car elle était associée au tag "cycleway:left:oneway=-1" conformément au schéma recommandé par le wiki.

Bonne continuation

Benoît
Xvtn (2023-12-15 23:53:20+00:00): I went over your other recent changes too. Looks great to me! Thanks for your additions - this is valuable info!
Metzor (2023-12-12 05:44:58+00:00): Hi carsten,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) 

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Please also have a look at this page as you use StreetComplete:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#A_changeset_made_with_StreetComplete_covers_a_massive_area%2C_why_is_this%3F_How_can_it_be_prevented%3FHi Olivia,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) 

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!Hi Olivia,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) 

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Necessarycoot72 (2023-12-12 02:47:18+00:00): Hi, great work adding houses. But in the future square their corners. (you can press q by default)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145020099
qwertyuiop12345678901 (2023-12-12 21:01:29+00:00): Heya, thanks for that did not know that this was a feature, will do that from now on plan is to finish the rest of Hokowhitu :)
Necessarycoot72 (2023-12-13 02:57:35+00:00): sure, no problem, also if you want to see more shortcuts you can see them on the wiki. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Shortcuts. Happy mapping :)
Xvtn (2023-12-13 22:58:41+00:00): Looks great. Thanks for your contribution! One minor thing - changeset comment is for describing what you changed. So in the future you might put something like "Added buildings in Heber and surrounding area".
Thanks again, and welcome to OSM!
MxxCon (2023-12-13 04:55:39+00:00): Should that be leisure=slipway or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:canoe%3Dput_in ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145020329
IraGersh (2023-12-13 14:25:07+00:00): slipway is fine.  I left it.
canoe would be wrong as its not meant to be used where there is a ramp.  It would be appropriate at 172nd on the Hudson River.  I'll check that out.  per the link "For places where a boat (canoe/kayak/stand up paddleboard/row boat/paddle-craft) is carried to and from the water use. It's used for spots without a ramp. "
IraGersh (2023-12-13 14:37:13+00:00): This is the changeset for that other area I was thinking of where there is no ramp.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145077494
On the north side of the GWB there is a tiny inlet or cove where jetskis can land.  Nothing is ever carried there to my knowledge though it could be. I wouldn't label it as a slipway but maybe another feature?  Certainly a kayak could land there also.
IraGersh (2023-12-14 22:25:27+00:00): I saw how you changed sand to pebbles at the Fort Washington Beach.  I could care less but it really is sand.  Unbelievable I know.  Go there and see.  I asked someone a long time ago where it came from.
MxxCon (2023-12-14 22:35:04+00:00): Sure, if you know that it should be sand, you can update it. 👍From satellite it looked rocky.
Doulland (2023-12-15 00:25:15+00:00): North-South through traffic is not allowed at this junction, nor is turning here. This junction only allows U turns from Sturt St to Sturt St. Verify via street view and revert changes or at least alter the turning movements allowed
TheSwavu (2023-12-15 05:41:56+00:00): Reverted changeset, does not match current intersection geometry.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145136421
Tomas Straupis (2023-12-12 07:13:04+00:00): Neegzistuojantis adresas.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-12-31 15:58:39+00:00): شكرا جزيلا لك
f_husni (2024-09-24 11:30:49+00:00): Hallo.  saya melihat mba telah menambahkan access no pada ruas jalan https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157339030#map=18/-6.247975/107.115406&layers=N  atau  node/145021541  bisa dilihat history edit nya https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/11411367617  sehingga menyebabkan masalah pada navigasi disekitar jalan tsb.  saya telah menganalisas dan melihat pada mapilary street level imagery bahwa jalan tersebut tidak ada gate dengan access=no https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-6.247823482507357&lng=107.11340676196448&z=18.00287568220563&pKey=1101003754319725&focus=map  

mohon untuk berhati-hati kedepannya dalam menambah tag access no pada suatu ruas jalan. terimakasih
Frans S (2023-12-30 11:35:41+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, you often did not square the rectangular buildings



Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145021582
user_5359 (2023-12-13 08:05:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys). Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org!
If you need help, You are welcome!
❤️‍🔥 (2023-12-13 15:28:24+00:00): not sure why the future CRL platforms are now visible. I don't think i edited them in this changeset
arjunaraoc (2023-12-12 13:01:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia) Village nodes have to be separate from  highway. I have fixed the error vide https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145036932
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145022305
gscholz (2024-03-05 09:05:00+00:00): Hi Stu D,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of "San Carlos":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-84.77647&lat=11.12215&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145022678

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4011860/history#map=15/12.0769/-85.9379

I have just fixed this. Please watch out what you are doing.

Kind regards
Guido
Nithinat S (2023-12-14 14:59:17+00:00): Hi, Russ
Of course, the 11 itself should be trunk. By the way, the 127 is better suited for trunk because it connects 11 sections together as an intercity network. So the classification of this 11 section and 127 should be swapped, as in a note I've added. As a result, according to current wiki guidelines, 127 should be trunk, while this 11 section should be primary instead.
Xvtn (2023-12-15 23:52:03+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contribution! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. Everything looks good to me! One very minor thing you may want to change - it's best to be explicit for every day of the week on opening_hours tag. That means putting the days the office is closed too. (Mo-Fr 08:30-17:30; Sa-Su off)
Thanks again and happy mapping!
fortera_au (2023-12-12 06:07:15+00:00): Hi there Sydney Airport Parking, you've removed amenity=parking from this and another object, that tag is what actually marks these as parking areas, you'd want to add those back in!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145023241
Xvtn (2023-12-15 23:37:45+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contribution! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. Looks like a few things are wrong here:
- You removed highway=* tags from a couple roads. Those are necessary to mark things as roads. Looks like another mapper already fixed your Twain Ave removal.
- It seems like the towing company you added might be misplaced or spam. Can you give a source that this is really accurate info? (In-person survey is a valid source.) If this is your business that you run from your home, it's debatable whether the info is appropriate for OSM. Perhaps a relevant test might be, if someone showed up here, could they be served in-person?
- The Description tag should be a concise description of the feature rather than a free-form ad space.

I fixed what I could here. Let me know what you think about the placement thing. Thanks again and happy mapping!
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-28 16:26:57+00:00): Individual trees should not be mapped as a circular area and tagged as woods.  Individual nodes should be used for individual trees.

I have gone through and cleaned this up for you.
gscscnd (2023-12-13 11:54:09+00:00): Musiałbyś turn:lanes i zakazy zawracania poprawić. Tutaj nie ma fizycznej bariery, więc najlepiej by było zostawić bez osobnych dróg do skręcania.
Kovoschiz (2023-12-12 08:21:37+00:00): Please don't remove `highway=crossing` when the `=service` is not flat, and there are crossing facilities for it.
GSF1200S (2023-12-14 04:07:54+00:00): Warning: 
That guy (Kovoschiz), knowing nothing about the difference between "proposed" and "under construction", is coming back and revert everything. LOL
Kovoschiz (2023-12-14 05:23:11+00:00): Warning: 
This guy (GSF1200S), knowing nothing about the difference between different users, accuses others of doing things they didn't do on random changesets of others.
tastrax (2023-12-12 08:20:59+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
m_p_13 (2023-12-12 09:58:54+00:00): Thanks:)
Baloo Uriza (2023-12-12 19:34:26+00:00): Well, made a building outline.  Bounding box is something else.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145026430
Allison P (2023-12-13 01:04:25+00:00): Where is building?
Baloo Uriza (2023-12-13 05:28:33+00:00): Good point, probably should have building=retail on it based on having seen it.
Sujanmanandhar (2023-12-14 07:31:26+00:00): Could your elaborate ? I can't understand the feedback.
Baloo Uriza (2023-12-14 12:45:51+00:00): You forgot to tag this building=retail, so the map doesn't show a building.
conradoos (2023-12-12 19:25:11+00:00): Na zdjęciach z Mapillary nie widać, żeby był tam znak, że droga jest jednokierunkowa. W związku z tym tag oneway=yes jest niepoprawny.
Zmiana do wycofania.
:-} (2023-12-13 06:01:51+00:00): Normalny samochód/ pks nie zawraca inaczej tam, więc nie widzę powodu wycofywania
conradoos (2023-12-13 06:24:55+00:00): Tag oneway=yes służy do oznaczania dróg jednokierunkowych https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway
Inne użycie jest błędne.
Baloo Uriza (2023-12-12 19:35:12+00:00): Mostly good, but the name needs to only be the name, not all the extra stuff.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145026462
Sujanmanandhar (2023-12-14 07:33:09+00:00): Thank you for the feedback.
mcliquid (2023-12-12 13:33:32+00:00): Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• and the most important one: upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
habi (2023-12-12 13:17:58+00:00): Ciao FranTi
Mit der "Ergänzung" hier hast du leider ein paar Verbindungen gekappt.
D.h. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298418788#map=19/47.36768/8.35071 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/57688035#map=19/47.36843/8.35173
Ich habe die Verbindungen wieder hergestellt und die groben Knicks in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/57688035 etwas geglättet.
Gruss,
habi
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145026939
habi (2023-12-12 13:22:58+00:00): Verbesserungsversuch in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145037664
conradoos (2023-12-12 19:28:14+00:00): A tutaj są znaki, że jest to droga jednokierunkowa? Czy tak jak w przypadku przystanku Arciechów dodałeś oneway=yes, bo tylko Ty uważasz, że tę stronę trzeba zawracać?
hikerake (2024-03-04 16:26:58+00:00): 您好，感谢您对香山地区osm路网的贡献，不过需要您注意的是，您在标注path时并不用加上access=no（全部交通方式一栏不用选），对各种交通方式分别标注是否可行即可
arjunaraoc (2023-12-15 22:30:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Name should be name of shop that is registered with local authorities.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145027166
hatul (2024-01-16 16:00:39+00:00): תודה על התרומה, אם יש נקודה קיימת בבקשה לערוך אותה ולא להוסיף עוד אחת
Henry572 (2023-12-12 09:10:55+00:00): Hallo indy-cator,
Danke für deinen Beirag zu OSM.
Ich habe den neuen Pfad noch mit einem Attribut highway=path versehen, sodass er als Pfad zu erkennen ist. Generell sollen die Objekte in OSM solche Attribute haben, um zu wissen, worum es sich handelt. Wenn du willst (und es weißt), könntest du noch z.B. die Oberfläche (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface), Beleuchtung (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:lit) oder ausgeschilderte Zugangsregelungen (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access) eintragen.
Gruß, Hendrik
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-02 13:17:12+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11411681539/history has access:bus that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using bus access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bus ) be fitting at least equally well?
samho1234567 (2024-10-08 13:35:02+00:00): Sorry for the very late reply. The main purpose of this changeset is to update tag `route_ref` for corresponding bus routes. It has nothing to do with `access:bus`.

I didn't edit `access:bus` . As a matter of fact, I am not familiar to bus access tag. Feel free to edit this tag if you wish.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-09 08:53:22+00:00): in this edit you created https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11411681539/history node with this tag

if this was not intentional I will just remove it

see also https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=145027658
jj000 (2023-12-12 10:48:53+00:00): Rotonde heeft geen afslag Dominee Posthumus Meijjesweg meer.
Leo Slager (2023-12-12 11:53:23+00:00): Hoi jellej00,
Hier gaan wat dingen fout:
De weg is nu verbonden met het voetpad. maar loopt door naar het fietspad.
Access=no en oneway=yes zijn dan niet meer correct en kunnen dus verwijderd worden van de way.
motorcar=no is overbodig maar kwaad kan het niet.

Kijk je zelf nog even ?
jj000 (2023-12-12 11:55:56+00:00): Ja ik ga er gelijk naar kijken. Dank voor meekijken!
jj000 (2023-12-12 12:00:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145034967
jj000 (2023-12-24 13:54:55+00:00): footway designated op brug klopt niet echt, want G12a bord gaat alleen over het verplichte fiets / bromfietspad. Ik heb er nu foot=yes + sidewalk=left van gemaakt.
Los intekenen van het footway lijkt ook niet logisch, omdat je dan 2 ways met bridge=yes over de rondweg krijgt. Er is maar 1 bridge. 
Zie versie #8 van way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6984763
gscholz (2023-12-16 07:59:33+00:00): 

Hi VahagnV,
your recent changesets have created several errors regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=44.57043&lat=40.88640&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145027938

As you may know, this kind of errors irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?

Kind regards
Guido
Patchanka (2023-12-13 17:57:58+00:00): bonjour
merci pour l'ajout de l'école !
eggie (2023-12-12 11:26:52+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

De shoptag en website/phone  heb ik toegevoegd.

MVG
eggie
Bienson (2023-12-13 01:52:31+00:00): Überschneidung der Gebäude und Form korrigiert, falsche Adresse und Geschossanzahl am Gebäude gelöscht, verschobenes Duplikat der Autovermietung gelöscht und falsche Adresse der Autovermietung korrigiert:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145057848
MarcoR (2023-12-13 09:25:59+00:00): Ciao! Per favore cerca di inserire solo dati che non riguardino la vita privata di altre persone.

Buon mapping,
Marco
arjunaraoc (2023-12-17 01:08:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia) check my correction vide https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145201829
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145029212
arjunaraoc (2023-12-17 01:26:37+00:00): I made a minor update vide https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145202041
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145029212
gurglypipe (2023-12-12 10:00:01+00:00): Hi, there now appear to be a number of ways in this changeset which don’t include the place they’re in in their address tagging at all.

For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398407870 is bang in the middle of Slaidburn, but its address tagging doesn’t mention Slaidburn at all. If you were just looking at the tagging, you’d think it’s in Clitheroe, 10 miles away.

What’s the fix for that, because that can’t be right?
Paul Berry (2023-12-12 11:01:11+00:00): Address details now have the locales added. Thanks.
gurglypipe (2023-12-12 11:05:55+00:00): Ta
osmviborg (2023-12-12 10:22:48+00:00): Marker erhvervsområde hvor der er erhverv: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=industrial#When_not_to_use
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-12 09:41:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6343827843
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/633127145

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
arjunaraoc (2023-12-18 06:09:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145030041