piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MARTAnerd (2026-01-12 17:52:21+00:00): Hello! OpenRailwayMap's wiki describes that name tags on tracks would ideally be the subdivision name or similar and even gives line as a descriptor. The line color names on tracks are a step towards naming DART's light rail segments after their project name as I am currently in the process of consolidating historical planning documents from DART's development to properly name the segments in accordance with their project names. 

The tag railway=light_rail already describes what types of vehicles traverse the tracks, naming them DART Light Rail would be like naming an interstate Dallas Highway. 

Regardless, the new trackage naming is frankly more consistent with other railway and transit infrastructure in the US. Seattle, Minneapolis, and LA have the physical tracks named in accordance with the routes on them alongside the route relations. The argument that any LRV can traverse over any of the lines does not really make sense to me, as the physical infrastructure and the route traveled by trains are not necessarily mutually inclusive and can be two different things. An Orange Line train can travel on Blue/Red Line tracks if heading to CROF. The trackage name isn't what determines the route the train is running.

I do concede that the names aren't perfect as DART could change service patterns or change the line names. That is why I'm working to identify the names of their projects that better fit the subdivision/branch/line guide when naming tracks similar to what I did in Atlanta.
QuiLe (2026-01-19 04:36:34+00:00): I wonder if these corridor names are helpful enough. I do not know whether these are official names. These maps highlight the station corridors. 

https://www.dart.org/about/about-dart/about-dart/dart-facts#:~:text=arrow_forward-,DART%20Rail%20Facts,-DART%27s%20Rail%20Cars

1. Downtown Dallas Central Business District
2. Irving/DFW Corridor
3. North Central Corridor
4. Northeast Corridor
5. Northwest Corridor
6. Southeast Corridor
7. South Oak Cliff Corridor
8. West Oak Cliff Corridor
MARTAnerd (2026-01-20 22:45:48+00:00): Hi QuiLe, thank you for the source! 

Somehow, I missed that source, but it does corroborate the information from the planning documents I've dug up. I'll be implementing the new names soon.
QuiLe (2026-01-20 23:09:31+00:00): No problem! This is much better than using Line names since that can change. In retrospect, corridor names rarely change.
Kevin Kofler (2026-02-19 06:02:08+00:00): Wieso "Südstrand Donauinsel"? Steht das wirklich irgendwo so angeschrieben? Das ist doch das Gänsehäufel, nicht die Donauinsel!

Und zu dem hier:

> Removed non-standard max_clothing tag; nudism=designated is sufficient.

Nein, ist es nicht. Auch offiziell ausgewiesene FKK-Bereiche, in der FKK NICHT verpflichtend ist, z.B. auf der Donauinsel, sind nudism=designated. Der richtige Tag hier ist nudism=obligatory. Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nudism
Bauxite (2026-01-11 15:25:17+00:00): Pour être bien claire : "Ami" occupe actuellement la totalité du rez-de-chaussée de l’immeuble.
Dimitar155 (2026-01-11 18:05:22+00:00): Благодаря!
rik_ (2026-01-13 09:34:12+00:00): Hi Aleks,

beide Seen sind direkt verbunden - ohne Schleuse, Wehr o. Ä. Drei Meter Niveauunterschied kann nicht plausibel sein.

Viele Grüße

rik
Aleks-Berlin (2026-01-13 09:39:50+00:00): das sah ich auch, aber wikidata hat diese werte. leider haben auch die behördendaten oft keinen ele-wert. ich hatte vermutet, dass es unter einer strassenbrücke ein kleines wehr geben könnte.
Aleks-Berlin (2026-01-13 09:41:50+00:00): eventuell jahresschwankungen? der grundwasserspiegel in DE sank in den letzten 10 Jahren im Mittel um einzelne Meter. ??
VG
rik_ (2026-01-13 09:55:57+00:00): Schwankungen gibt es, aber definitiv nicht drei Meter. 

Ich lebe in der Gegend, das hätte ich mitbekommen. Einzelne Seen in der Region haben in den vergangenen Dürrejahren durchaus mal einen knappen halben Meter verloren. 

Aber selbst wenn das hier der Fall wäre, würden beide Seen gleich betroffen sein. Hier verläuft auch eine Wasserstraße, deren Wasserspiegel upstream in Neue Mühle geregelt wird. Diese Seen sind weniger von Schwankungen im Wasserspiegel betroffen, als alleinstehende.

Im Zweifel würde ich die Werte weglassen, statt falsche stehen zu lassen. In Wikidata gibt es ja auch keine Quelle zu den Werten (wenn ich das richtig deute)
Aleks-Berlin (2026-01-13 13:35:10+00:00): könnte man das mit eine genauen GPS messung (10 min Mittelung) ermitteln?
evtl. relativ zu bekannten nahen referenzen (peaks etc)
ich hätte auch in wikidata gerne bessere werte.
VG aus Wildau
Aleks-Berlin (2026-01-13 13:38:08+00:00): hier gibt es Höhenlinien (an Land), evtl. hieraus ableiten?
https://opentopomap.org/#map=15/52.15204/13.62253
streckenkundler (2026-01-15 19:24:13+00:00): Hallo Jungs,

...da kommt man mit einfachen Mitteln raus... BrandenburgViewer --> hierhin navigieren-->DGM1 einblenden auf den See klicken. Angezeigt wird dann jeweils "Höhenangabe NHN: 33,8+/-0,3m
Ich selbst vetraue da dem DGM1

Sven
itineris (2026-01-12 17:18:04+00:00): Szia!

Ha beltéri térképezést csinálsz, kérlek, a lépcsőkről se hagy le az indoor=yes címkét!

Nagyobb baj, hogy a vonalaid sok esetben duplázott pontokat tartalmaznak.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=19.05582&lat=47.48139&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=long_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way%2Clong_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way
Kérlek, ezeket javítsd!

Köszönöm:
Ákos
Godo365 (2026-01-13 19:48:30+00:00): Szia!

Köszi hogy szólsz, javítom is. Több emeletet is szeretnék csinálni, még most derüljön ki ha nem jól csinálok valamit :)

A geofabrik-on van lehetőség látni hogy melyik emeleten van a probléma (a duplázott pontokkal)?

Üdv,
Godó
itineris (2026-01-13 21:43:59+00:00): Sajnos ott csak ennyire lehet belenagyítani, és emiatt rendesen rákattintani sem lehet.
Godo365 (2026-01-13 21:52:31+00:00): Semmi gond, közben megtaláltam JOSM-ben hogy kell. Javítom, köszi!
eggie (2026-01-11 15:46:21+00:00): Dag Depher..
Tip..Beter niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dat geeft vaak schade.

Mvg..
eggie
DepherJ0hn (2026-01-11 15:53:31+00:00): Hoi,
Bedankt voor de tip, maar ik zie niet waar de schade hier is.
eggie (2026-01-11 15:58:14+00:00): Die is er niet.. 😀
Maar we zien dat vaak. Dan selecteert iemand onbewust een node en gaat schuiven. Dan schuift niet de kaart. maar de node met alles wat er aan vastzit.

Selecteren doe je in iD met de linkermuis..maar selecteren ook.

Er ontbreek wel een source=BAG bij een adres.
Mapse..
eggie
DepherJ0hn (2026-01-11 16:01:16+00:00): Ah, oke. Ik schuif met middelmuis knop (als ik het niet vergeet...)
eggie (2026-01-11 16:03:19+00:00): Prima... en als je zou overschakelen naar josm kun je met de rechtermuis schuiven.
eggie (2026-01-11 16:04:24+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047
osmviborg (2026-01-11 16:03:20+00:00): Hej, gider du lade være med at tegne highway=*_link's på steder hvor vognbanerne ikke er fysisk adskilte fra hinanden. Malede striber og små ø'er er ikke at betragte som adskillelse. Brug 'turnlanes' i stedet. Du kan læse om det her: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Divided_highways
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-25 03:46:17+00:00): DWG revert - apparent undiscussed import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177668049
Mannivu (2026-01-11 17:45:50+00:00): Ciao. Per le convenzioni della comunità italiana, gli indirizzi non vanno indicati sui poligoni degli edifici, ma su un nodo in prossimità dell'ingresso alla proprietà (sia esso un cancello o una porta). Vedi anche https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses#Regole_specifiche_per_l'Italia
DavideE75 (2026-01-12 16:49:36+00:00): Grazie per la segnalazione. Se capisco bene è già stato quindi modificato il civico slegandolo dal poligono. Grazie
Mannivu (2026-01-12 16:52:13+00:00): Esattamente, con questa modifica --> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177107602
eggie (2026-01-11 16:57:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Luzandro (2026-01-12 06:32:11+00:00): Hallo,

der Parkplatz wurde jetzt nicht mehr angezeigt, weil die Fläche sich selbst geschnitten hat und auch der Umriss des Gebäude wurde durch das Snappen auf die Parkplatzfläche und die dadurch erzeugte Schräge nicht besser. Solche "Präzisierung" per Handy-App ist nicht wirklich sinnvoll.

https://imgur.com/a/XJ08I7F
mueschel (2026-01-12 10:58:47+00:00): Hi & welcome to OSM!
In your edits you used many tags that are not used in any other place.

In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.

Please make sure that you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.
mavl (2026-01-12 16:16:17+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет тег "addr:street=Таежный проезд". На географических картах (и в географических каталогах) указывают букву "ё". В OpenStreetMap букву "ё" тоже указывают.  
Название улицы исправлено.
Ozon OSM9 (2026-01-12 16:25:16+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо, что исправили. Буду внимательнее.
IreuN (2026-04-22 22:03:18+00:00): Zanim dostanę reverta - zgoda autora filmu uzyskana, przepraszam
mcliquid (2026-01-12 07:11:22+00:00): Was ist an disused:highway falsch?
Gerold (2026-01-12 07:24:19+00:00): War das ein Track, den ich gelöscht habe, weil er nicht mehr auf den Luftbildern auftaucht?
mcliquid (2026-01-12 07:27:09+00:00): Korrekt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220562259/history
eggie (2026-01-11 18:31:51+00:00): Yep... busroutes gelukt.
Er zijn hier wel aparte G11 fietspaden. Die kun je apart intekenen. cycleway=lane klopt hier niet.

MVG
eggie
juni_vv (2026-01-11 18:33:45+00:00): top. ik wilde daar even mee wachten tot ik zeker was dat het goed was gegaan!

Ik ga nu de fietspaden doen.

groetjes,
juniper
rarad74 (2026-01-11 16:40:52+00:00): Tu ai un retard mintal sua te prefaci?
AndyB_66 (2026-01-11 18:50:18+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Dave Venables (2026-01-11 17:06:45+00:00): The post town for NG17 in Sutton-in-Ashfield is Sutton-in-Ashfield.
The post town for NG17 Kirkby-in-Ashfield is Nottingham (I used addr:town for Kirkby-in-Ashfield)
The border is roughly the A38 I think
Dave Venables (2026-01-11 17:23:40+00:00): This changeset has also populated addr:place with <different>
I had not expected NG17 to have two different post towns but I checked this using the addresses for post offices when updating addresses in Kirkby-in-Ashfield. Wikipedia post towns entry also seems to confirm this but may not be a suitable source in isolation.
⇄ john paul jones & gringo (2026-01-12 10:35:23+00:00): Dave, sorry about the <different> tag, I'm not sure how this happens seeing as I almost never use the place tag. Perhaps a glitch in JOSM ?? Anyway thanks for pointing this out. 
Hopefully I've removed these now
Langlaeufer (2026-01-11 18:08:29+00:00): Wo hast du denn die Info her?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177104617
Langlaeufer (2026-01-11 18:11:26+00:00): O.k. ich habs gefunden: https://www.haz.de/lokales/umland/springe/mountainbike-streit-im-deister-region-will-legale-trails-ab-januar-sperren-JRBN3PIUPRFYZBRGDTLPANHJSM.html
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177104617
osmmapper222 (2026-01-11 18:44:09+00:00): In den Hinweisen des Changesets (s. oben bei den Metadaten) habe die Infos dazu beim NDR gefunden und verlinkgt gehabt: 

https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/niedersachsen/hannover_weser-leinegebiet/letzte-abfahrt-schluss-fuer-legale-downhill-trails-im-deister,mountainbike-130.html
yzal (2026-01-13 15:16:04+00:00): Dobrý deň, pobočky zásielkovne/packety nie sú shop=kiosk, to je značenie pre novinový stánok.

Obchody ktoré poskytujú služby pre rôznych poštových operátorov sa značia cez post_office=post_partner, ktorý sa pridá na už existujúci obchod https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:post_office=post_partner

Takto je pobočka packety vo farboch lakoch hepner označená už od roku 2023.
miron70 (2026-01-14 08:22:16+00:00): Ok, tomu rozumiem. Ale potom neviem ako zaznacit udaje pre danu sluzbu napr. Packeta (otv.hodiny, url na stranku packety,...), ktore su ine ako pre hlavny objekt?  
Napr. v Prievidzi na Rozvoji je Tipsport, Fortuna, Tipos, Zasielkovna vsetko na jednom mieste. Ako to vsetko zaznacit do jedneho bodu ? Teraz su tam asi 3-4 samostatne body....
Dik za info
miron70 (2026-01-14 08:46:14+00:00): Este jedna poznamka: v Handlovej je bod: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11302110241
Tieto FarbyLaky maju otvarcie hodiny pre Packetu ine ako samotne FarbyLaky. 
Ako potom zaznacit ine otv.hodiny pre Packetu a FarbyLaky , ked to bude v jednom bode ?
miron70 (2026-01-14 08:50:03+00:00): Este tu je odpoved AI na otazku: ako zaznacit do openstreetmap vydajne miesto Packeta/Zasielkovna , ked sa nachadza v obchode ?

=====================
Zaznačenie výdajného miesta Packeta (Zásielkovňa) do OpenStreetMap (OSM), ak sa nachádza vo vnútri inej prevádzky (napr. v potravinách, papiernictve alebo v kaviarni), sa riadi pravidlom: **vytvoriť samostatný bod (node)**.

Nemali by ste pridávať tagy Packety priamo na budovu alebo na existujúci bod obchodu, pretože ide o dve odlišné služby.

Tu je postup a zoznam správnych tagov:

### 1. Kde umiestniť bod

V editore (iD alebo JOSM) vytvorte nový bod (node) **vo vnútri plochy obchodu**. Ak je obchod zaznačený len ako bod, umiestnite bod Packety tesne vedľa neho.

### 2. Povinné a odporúčané tagy (Atribúty)

Pre klasické výdajné miesto (obsluha za pultom) použite tieto tagy:

* **`amenity=parcel_pickup_point`** (toto je hlavný tag pre výdajné miesta)
* **`brand=Packeta`**
* **`brand:wikidata=Q105943725`** (pomáha jednoznačne identifikovať značku v databáze)
* **`operator=Názov obchodu`** (napr. *Potraviny Mix*) – sem píšeme, kto reálne službu prevádzkuje.
* **`name=Packeta`** (voliteľné, niekedy sa dáva napr. *Packeta - Potraviny Mix*)
* **`ref=12345`** (veľmi dôležité – ID číslo výdajného miesta, ktoré nájdete na webe alebo v aplikácii Packety)

### 3. Doplnkové informácie

* **`opening_hours=*`** (otváracie hodiny – väčšinou sú zhodné s obchodom)
* **`check_date=2024-05-20`** (dátum, kedy ste overili, že tam miesto stále je)

---

### Rozdiel: Výdajné miesto vs. Z-BOX

Ak nejde o výdajné miesto v obchode, ale o **samoobslužný Z-BOX** (červený automat), tagovanie je iné:

* **`amenity=parcel_locker`** (toto je tag pre automaty/boxy)
* **`brand=Packeta`**
* **`operator=Packeta`**
* **`parcel_pickup=yes`**
* **`parcel_mail_in=yes`** (ak box umožňuje aj odosielanie zásielok)
* **`ref=ID boxu`**

### Praktický tip pre editor iD (webový prehliadač)

1. Kliknite na tlačidlo **Bod** (Point) a kliknite do mapy na miesto obchodu.
2. Vľavo do vyhľadávania prvkov napíšte "Zásielkovňa" alebo "Packeta". Ak ju nenájde, vyberte všeobecné "Výdajné miesto balíkov" (Parcel Pickup Point).
3. Ručne v sekcii "Všetky vlastnosti" (Tags) doplňte vyššie uvedené kľúče a hodnoty.

**Poznámka:** Hoci sa firma premenovala na Packeta, v slovenskej komunite OSM sa stále často používajú oba názvy, ale `brand=Packeta` je aktuálne preferovaný. Ak chcete byť precízny, pridajte aj `old_name=Zásielkovňa`.
miron70 (2026-01-14 13:16:16+00:00): Dobry den,
uz som si stihol pozriet ako ste upravili node v Pd Farby Hepner  - ako sa spoja udaje o firme , ked prevadzkuje aj Packetu. 
Uz je mi to jasnejsie.

Dakujem za info 
Pekny den
yzal (2026-01-14 13:18:37+00:00): Nad otváracími hodinami, odkazom na web packety prípadne ďalšími vecami súvisiacimi s packetou a nie samotným obchodom som rozmýšľal a neviem na to odpoveď. Odkaz na wiki stránke OSM nič také nespomína.

Ak chcete skúste sa opýtať na fóre slovenskej OSM komunity https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk
yzal (2026-01-14 13:39:55+00:00): Čo sa týka značky amenity=parcel_pickup_point tak k tomu som na wiki nič nenašiel (tým netvrdím že je to zle, len to nie je nijako zdokumentované) a tá značka nie je na celom Slovensku použitá ani raz. Netuším z kade AI brala informácie.

Inak teraz som pozeral ako to značili ľudia inde po slovensku a napr. tu je pre otváracie hodiny poštových operátorov použitá značka post_office:opening_hours=* https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10749636179#map=19/48.122080/17.097655&layers=N

a pre web na stránku poštových operátorov je používané post_office:website=* https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11372979399#map=19/48.144801/17.145305&layers=N

Tak isto pre spôsoby platby je použité post_office:payment:debit_cards=yes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12119861361#map=19/48.028748/17.306940&layers=N a tak ďalej.

Čo mi dáva aj zmysel, že pre značky použité špeciálne pre službu poštového operátora a nie pre samotný obchod sa používa ten prefix "post_office:"

Čo sa týka značenia obchod+poštový operátor na jednom bode alebo zvlášť tak v prípade značenie s post_office:post_partner je to momentálne značené všetko na jednom bode, alebo všetko na budove. Tým ale netvrdím, že je na tom nejaká zhoda a že je to pravidlo.  Preto ako som písal asi najlepšie by bolo sa opýtať na Slovenskom fóre OSM či existuje nejaká zhoda ako to značiť. A poprípade sa odkázať na túto diskusiu.
MappSurfer (2026-01-12 09:06:03+00:00): Hallo d_berger

Warum hast du bei den Busroutenrelationen die Brand-Tags und bei der Moonlinerlinie M51 zudem u.a. das Website- und das reservation-Tag entfernt?

Liebe Grüsse
MappSurfer
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-14 04:25:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13448449291
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13448449292

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
democat (2026-01-12 03:34:12+00:00): Hello, I believe CROF in the building name needs to be expanded to its full title, as abbreviations are usually not allowed in names. DART is fine as that is one of its official names
MARTAnerd (2026-01-12 15:25:08+00:00): Hi there, I agree with your premise. CROF is just what name I saw the most predominantly and it did not occur to me to unabbreviate the name there. As such, I'll change that. Thank you!
spughetti (2026-01-12 17:26:36+00:00): Hi tykayn!

Just in case you weren't aware, tags use British spelling instead of American. I've re-tagged a way you tagged with color=green to colour=green.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177147859

Cheers!
Strubbl (2026-01-11 19:06:30+00:00): Vielen Dank für's Aktualisieren!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-11 17:43:17+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 177060928, 177061076, 177061224, 177061271, 177061324, 177061354, 177061520, 177061586, 177061636, 177061710, 177061771, 177061950, 177062006, 177062059, 177062140, 177062192, 177062218, 177062249, 177062493, 177062775, 177062864, 177062910, 177063022, 177063060, 177063127, 177063196, 177063239, 177063293, 177063373, 177063411, 177063464, 177064404, 177064553, 177064666, 177064828, 177065013, 177065085, 177065158, 177065224, 177065417, 177065502, 177066068, 177066256, 177066345, 177066419, 177066517, 177066758, 177066816, 177066866, 177066960.
AndyB_66 (2026-01-11 18:48:10+00:00): Stosuj się, proszę, do reguł nazywania zestawów zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
eggie (2026-01-11 18:25:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-01-11 18:26:38+00:00): Geef svp wel concreet commentaar bij je uploads,
Dave Venables (2026-01-12 08:36:23+00:00): Nottingham is the correct post town addr:city for Kirkby-in-Ashfield https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9246080 probably NG17 7, 8 and 9 and is used for the post office there https://www.postoffice.co.uk/branch-finder/5612276/kirkby-in-ashfield. I preferred to use addr:town rather than addr:suburb for Kirkby-in-Ashfield
Sutton-in-Ashfield is the post town addr:city for Sutton-in-Ashfield https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9246081probably NG17 1-6 and is used by the post office there https://www.postoffice.co.uk/branch-finder/4172272/sutton-in-ashfield
I was surprized to see multiple post-towns for NG17 but Wikipedia suggests that this is possible https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_town "In some places several post towns cover a single postal district (with each post town corresponding to one or more of its postcode sectors)" with this also shown for NG17 in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NG_postcode_area although this should be independently verified using other sources
⇄ john paul jones & gringo (2026-01-12 09:49:27+00:00): addr:town town is not presented in JOSM (my usual editor) whereas addr:city is. I was not aware NG17 had two postal Cities, my bad. I see now looking Roberts’s error checking page it indeed does, and wiki 
https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/post-towns/NG.html
having a split postal City is unusual I must admit, probably why I missed it, sorry Dave
Frans S (2026-01-14 11:07:01+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Please restrict yourself to the requirements. Map only buildings.
A: Inaccurate mapping. 
C: Collected adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.

E: Buildings not squared or rounded.


Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177106887
gscholz (2026-01-13 08:33:19+00:00): Hi Hugoren Martinako - import,
this changeset has left behind a broken relation for "Reserva da Biosfera Terras do Miño":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-7.38085&lat=43.15606&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9714943/history#map=10/43.1746/-7.5593

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Hugoren Martinako (2026-01-13 13:18:43+00:00): Solved
gscholz (2026-01-13 15:01:32+00:00): Thanks for your quick response.
Guido
Harry Wood (2026-01-12 01:55:58+00:00): Nice work updating Stroud Green Road! 

Looks like you've resolved a couple of notes with that: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4898793 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4898794
spiregrain (2026-01-12 08:22:35+00:00): I was in the area, and for once I remembered to check the Open Notes ahead of time.  (But forgot to close them, as you saw)