piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscscnd (2023-06-27 06:23:59+00:00): Staraj się nie tworzyć takich plątanin, utrudnia to edycję i może robić problemy m.in. z rutingiem. Lepiej podziel tę drogę tak, żeby nie miała pętli.
LockOnGuy (2023-06-26 23:58:16+00:00): Hi ڕاستی, in this changeset you deleted 12 English names entirely from the ways. Please next time just move the English name from name to name:en instead of deleting them entirely.    
Regards.
jmarchon (2023-06-26 23:23:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137811649
jmarchon (2023-06-26 23:24:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137811658
jmarchon (2023-06-26 23:24:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137811664
jmarchon (2023-06-26 23:24:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137811666
jmarchon (2023-06-26 23:24:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137811670
jmarchon (2023-06-26 23:24:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137811674
jmarchon (2023-06-26 23:25:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137811680
jmarchon (2023-06-26 23:25:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137811684
jmarchon (2023-06-26 23:25:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137811687
jmarchon (2023-06-26 23:25:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137811690
jmarchon (2023-06-26 23:25:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137811695
jmarchon (2023-06-26 23:25:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137811697
jmarchon (2023-06-26 23:26:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137811700
jmarchon (2023-06-26 23:26:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137811703
jmarchon (2023-06-26 23:26:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137811706
jmarchon (2023-06-26 23:26:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137811709
jmarchon (2023-06-26 23:26:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137811713
jmarchon (2023-06-26 23:26:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137811718
citrula (2023-06-30 20:31:06+00:00): Hello PDX_To_SJC123

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I understand your concern about the accessibility of these driveways, but this is not the correct way to do it - If these driveways are private, then you can add the tag `access=private` in order to indicate so. Removing valid data from the map will result in someone else coming back through later and adding it back, without the valuable information you can add. Marking the ways as private will prevent people from being unintentionally routed down these roads, as well as show up as private on maps.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137811990
Woazboat (2023-07-02 00:41:30+00:00): These changes been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138008674 because they incorrectly removed information, disrupted road networks, and broke boundary relations and coastlines
Woazboat (2023-07-02 00:41:41+00:00): These changes been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138008674 because they incorrectly removed information, disrupted road networks, and broke boundary relations and coastlines
Glassman (2023-06-30 18:20:07+00:00): Typically polygons are used to describe nature reserves. I'm happy to help add the boundaries, just let me know.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137812058
relaemanila (2023-06-30 12:36:52+00:00): Hello,

Where is your source that you have added a proposed road? If this was speculative, then it might be better to remove it unless the reliable information is available or if that never exists.

Thank you!
PengualaHeadphones (2023-06-30 13:02:28+00:00): Resolved.
emersonveenstra (2023-06-27 00:59:04+00:00): Hi,

Can you please give a source for "The Rabbit Hole"? The website linked does not contain those words, nor does it appear online
claudia10 (2025-09-16 06:28:20+00:00): Hello padvinder, 
there are some areas around Amsterdam tagged with leisure=g. Seems like a typo mistake. What did you want to map there? 

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2bJo
padvinder (2025-09-19 21:20:50+00:00): that has to be leisure=garden
emersonveenstra (2023-06-27 01:01:41+00:00): Hi,

Are you sure you meant this to be a social club? The website listed appears to be a consulting firm, based off https://bitcoin101.io/services/, if so, the correct tag would be office=consulting (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office=consulting)
Woazboat (2023-07-02 00:41:50+00:00): These changes been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138008674 because they incorrectly removed information, disrupted road networks, and broke boundary relations and coastlines
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-02-02 00:19:03+00:00): Name tag should not be used for descriptions.
emersonveenstra (2023-06-27 00:55:13+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137812733 for potential vandalism: mass deletion of valid objects

Please do not delete objects unless they no longer exist on the ground, and please make better changeset comments that reflect what you're doing in the changeset
treestryder (2023-07-13 00:43:59+00:00): Thank you, emersonveenstra, for your vigilance and hard work.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137812548
Woazboat (2023-07-02 00:42:03+00:00): These changes been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138008674 because they incorrectly removed information, disrupted road networks, and broke boundary relations and coastlines
zstadler (2025-01-08 19:25:33+00:00): Hi,

Could you correct the "building:levels=q" of
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1185173940

Thanks!
user_19693999 (2023-06-27 02:44:35+00:00): Some of those lines that I targeted were in red that means somebody has trespassed on my property and decided to make a trail to my land and then it is marked as red dashes for walking and blue for biking on the website referring it as a legitimate place to go good go.  Where reason why I signed up and put those markings on there it’s because I’m getting 2 to 4 people every day coming through telling me that they have the right to come through because it’s on a map program. It’s like these people don’t understand what private property is about.  I am frustrated and I can’t find anybody to help me with these colored lines on my beautiful manicured roads on my 121 acres. It’s disrespectful and it is the law that they have to have permission for me to be coming on my land.  Anybody we catch they just proudly say that they found walking and biking trails in the mapping system and so therefore in their mind, they think they are free to do so, and they are not.!
PFla21 (2023-06-27 13:28:27+00:00): I apologise.  Newbie.
aixbrick (2023-06-27 13:04:01+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe im Rahmen von https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137834663 ein paar Korrekturen vorgenommen:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1185174900/history gibt es nicht. Das ist ein auf der Straße markierter Radweg und bereits an der Straße erfasst => daher gelöscht.
- Die "Inseln" vor dem Tivoli waren bereits als Flächen erfasst und hätten als "inner" übernommen werden können => habe ich korrigiert.
- In einer der "Inseln" hast du eine Fitness-Station mit Ringen eingetragen. Aktuell ist die mir nicht bekannt => daher erstmal gelöscht. Falls du da eine nachprüfbare Quelle hast, kann ich die wieder hinzufügen.
- Generell bitte nur baulich getrennte Wege als eigenständige Linien erfassen. Hier waren Eigenschaften z.T. schon an der Straße erfasst (sidewalk=both oder cycleway:right=track), was zu Dopplungen führt => doppelte Erfassungen gelöscht.
Gruß
Nils Springob (2023-06-27 13:47:51+00:00): Oh prima! Das mit den Inseln muss ich mir nochmal angucken, habe mir fast schon gedacht dass man dort die Linien eigentlich nicht noch einmal zeichnen muss :-) Bei den inner und outer Geschichten sind mir dann wohl auch die Ringe mit reingeraten, Danke nochmal für die Korrektur!
Bei dem Radweg/Fussweg muss man jedoch noch nacharbeiten, der Radweg führt dort an der Kreuzung zusammen mit den Fussgängern über die Fussgängerampel - der geroutete Weg wird sonst quer über die Busspur auf die Mitte der Kreuzung gelegt und danach wieder baulich getrennt... Ich denke es wäre besser das sidewalk=both bei dem Strassenstück zu löschen - wie siehst du das?
aixbrick (2023-06-27 16:14:18+00:00): Da hast du natürlich Recht, hatte ich nicht gesehen. Ich habe noch einen reinen Radweg erstellt, um ein sauberes Routing von der Kreuzungsmitte auf den straßenbegleitenden Weg zu ermöglichen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137842523). Sollte so passen.
adrianojbr (2023-07-03 22:39:02+00:00): Olá, lukadaoo!

Por que você marcou essas áreas como parques?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137813923
L29Ah (2023-06-30 13:18:18+00:00): There is no road between the church and the postal office. Why do you think otherwise (and draw one through a fence)?
CansoCanal (2023-06-30 21:57:46+00:00): Hello L29Ah, thank you for your input on this road.  To me it originally looked like this road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1185184618) connected through at the north end, but upon further inspection I agree that there is a fence or wall between them.  I have adjusted this road to end at the parking area behind the church and disconnected it from (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/450894810).
Fizzie-DWG (2023-07-11 05:13:23+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138361665
MelancholicSlav (2023-06-27 22:40:49+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM! It's always nice to see other people improving the map locally. Out of courtesy for other mappers, it is helpful if your changeset comments provide more insight into how you are changing the map in addition to where. The below link provides some examples. Thanks and happy mapping! 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Fizzie-DWG (2023-07-11 05:13:24+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138361665
Xvtn (2023-06-27 15:25:13+00:00): That bus stop path by the Family Life building is new enough to not be on some satellite imagery, or maybe they really did tear it out!? (right on the highway there)
mamanakis (2023-06-27 23:44:27+00:00): You’re correct about the stop. I just haven’t physically been in that spot since it was put in. I visited Today and I restored it took some GPS tracks during some of the other amenities.

The Aggie shuttle stop sign is now on the same pole as the green loop sign and the sign shows stop number 23 and not the prior stop number 24. The Aggie shuttle map still shows the stop numbered as 24. I’ll check the prior 23 and see if that number is changed to the map is a year old given the GroundTruth rule probably should change the stock number to 23 or someone should request the sign to be updated if it is in fact 24.
Xvtn (2023-06-28 14:55:55+00:00): Nice, thanks!! And that makes sense for the stop number. I agree that it should be what's marked on the sign.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-07-11 05:13:25+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138361665
Fizzie-DWG (2023-07-11 05:11:35+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138361613
Fizzie-DWG (2023-07-11 05:11:36+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138361613
michael60634 (2023-06-27 05:51:51+00:00): Hello Finlayson, kiwiAs, or whatever of the 47 other names you edit under.

Care to explain how adding a direction to a street sign is vandalism? I'm genuinely curious.
Friendly_Ghost (2023-06-27 06:55:18+00:00): Hello pharmacy2,

Please explain how this edit and other edits are disruptive. At first glance Michael's work looks OK to me.

Regards

Casper
Vinber-Pro (2023-06-30 09:01:31+00:00): c'est un doublon, la route existe déja ?
tu veux préciser qu'il y a la possibilité de marcher à pied ?
MjPinedaTV (2023-06-27 06:17:14+00:00): Was the location removed?
adjuva (2023-06-28 00:48:05+00:00): Hallo!

Wo ist bei diesem Kreisverkehr ein Wanderweg? Alle drei Ways haben identische Tags. Die Ways sind ausschließlich Member in Bus-Relationen. Kommt da noch was?

Schö Adjuva
staka-RBK_04 (2023-06-28 06:44:15+00:00): Hallo Adjuva,

Das sind Vorarbeiten zur Eintragung von Wanderwegeinformationen. Im ersten Schritt Trenne ich diese Abschnitte auf, im zweiten Schritt werden in einem Durchgang die Wanderwege als Relation vergeben. Im Rheinisch-Bergischen Kreis wurde dies schon zum großen Teil gemacht. Nun bin ich im OBK unterwegs. 

Viele Grüße
staka_RBK_04
streckenkundler (2023-06-28 08:14:03+00:00): Das Aufsplitten von Kreisverkehren ist in der Regel völlig unnötig und meiner Ansicht nach wie hier auch falsch! Auch für Rad- oder Wanderwege ist das nicht erforderlich. Das ist auch für Busrelationen nicht erforderlich!

Ein Aufsplitten eines Kreisverkehrs ist einzig nur nötig, wenn sich innerhalb des Kreisverkehrs die Anzahl der Fahrspuren ändert (Turbo-Kreisverkehre).

Sven
HikeAndMap (2023-07-05 21:37:06+00:00): Please would you be so kind to keep the bounding boxes small - so not everyone within a radius of 20.000km around Germany will be flagged using OSMCha..

Best practice is update some data in a province/municipality - then commit the changes - and then move on to the next municipality/province.

Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137819069
Helge_Inselmann (2023-07-06 13:05:08+00:00): Hi, this is Helge from the Wheelmap Team. 

We know that these big changesets are annoying - sorry! We really want to optimize this, but unfortunately it takes longer than planned.
The problem is on our to-do list. I ask for a little more patience. Please find updates here: https://github.com/sozialhelden/wheelmap-frontend/issues/327
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-04 16:18:40+00:00): bonjour,
tu as créé un batiment en double, alors qu'il existait déja. De plus tu n'as pas ajouté d'attribut pour pouvoir définir que c'est une école.

j'ai modifié, est-ce que cela te semble ok https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138114601 ?
felipeeugenio (2023-06-27 12:15:27+00:00): Hola
el tag building es para las estructuras, no para el recinto completo. gracias
ivannunez (2023-06-27 16:12:50+00:00): tienes razón, pero cuando lo edité ya estaba todo el recinto marcado así, ahora corregí el edificio como clinica y el recinto como terreno del hospital. saludos
felipeeugenio (2023-06-27 16:24:53+00:00): Hola. Gracias por tu tiempo.
No. hay una confusión acá. El edificio es un edificio. a lo mas puedes ponerlo como building=clinic

pero la clínica es todo el recinto. El edificio lo dejaste como clinic y el recinto como hospital, lo que no solo es una contradicción, si no que una redundancia.

dejé como clinic el recinto y el edificio como eso, un edificio.

la pregunta ahora es si es un hospital o una clínica. En Chile tenemos distorcionado el concepto porque le decimos clínicas a las privadas, siendo que son hospitales. 

En este caso: hay camas para pacientes? hacen prodecimientos en quirófanos? o solo es consulta?
Si es afirmativo entonces lo cambio a hospital.

 Por favor unirse al chat de Telegram de la comunidad, en donde se conversa todo esto a diario en el link https://t.me/OSMcl.

saludos
ivannunez (2023-06-27 16:34:25+00:00): Sí, te dejo literal lo que aparece en la página: tienen atención de urgencia adulto-pediátrico, servicios ambulatorios, hospitalización, procedimientos, exámenes de laboratorio, consultas de telemedicina y unidad de Maternidad.

Agradezco la invitación a Telegram, pero no uso esa plataforma. Saludos
felipeeugenio (2023-06-27 16:36:12+00:00): ok, gracias.
es un hospital entonces. yo lo cambio.
saludos
Vinber-Pro (2023-06-29 19:59:18+00:00): la route existait déja (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137932465),  j'ai supprimé le doublon
Vinber-Pro (2023-06-29 20:46:43+00:00): un fast food au milieu de la route ?
StefanHRT (2023-06-27 07:22:45+00:00): Moin, hat Lidl die recht frischen Fahrradständer hinter den Einkaufswagen wieder entfernt? https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/stefanhrt?lat=52.556699&lng=13.5539491&z=17&focus=photo&x=0.2258979962789595&y=0.598391473117355&zoom=0.7838550002889526&menu=true&panos=true&pKey=117869127661801 VG
Vinber-Pro (2023-06-29 21:04:26+00:00): de préférence amenity=doctors et healthcare=doctor. Hopital c'est plus équipé qu'un CSBII, voir ici https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_Madagascar/Formations_Sanitaires
soliMM (2023-07-01 12:58:17+00:00): Hello,

I'm a user mainly contributing to Montenegro and Serbia on OSM. While doing so, I have encountered some changes you have made in Podgorica. I would like to raise your attention that certain ways you have added are completely incorrectly tagged. 

The ways in question are: 
WAY: 1185210232
WAY: 1185225835
WAY: 1185221324
WAY: 1185225836

You have tagged those ways as primary_links and residential highways, which is completely false because those are footways. It is visible in the imagery so it must've been an honest overlook from your side but please try to not repeat errors like that. I will fix this momentarily.

Best regards
Milos
MountArvon (2023-07-06 01:43:22+00:00): Hello soliMM, 
Thank you for catching this and updating the junction. After further review of aerial imagery and Mapillary, I agree that these connections are footway crossings and I will be careful to look for these in the future.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-27 08:00:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9714658780

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Bolt033 (2023-06-27 08:50:41+00:00): Hello,
Thank for your observations. I removed ul. in front of street's name. Would you please check?
Much appreciated,
Alexandra
NorthCrab (2023-06-27 09:49:04+00:00): Thank you! It's perfect now :-)
Frans S (2023-06-27 15:00:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings do not meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. ( see attached document for more info)
A: Not accurately drawn.
B: Overlapping buildings.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapping them as 1 building.
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137820697
mueschel (2023-07-02 09:54:03+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the meaning of "loculi"? This tag is not used in any other place.
baprischka (2023-07-02 09:58:40+00:00): Hi, see the discussion here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:tomb%3Dcolumbarium
The idea is to indicate "walls of columbariums". If you have any other idea to tag such feature using existing tags, please tell me!
Vinber-Pro (2023-06-29 21:06:00+00:00): il manque un attribut pour le qualifier ?
foersterp (2023-08-12 13:34:58+00:00): Zur Änderung in Beelitz:
Warum hast du den Namen von Karl-Liebknecht-Straße in Karl-Liebknecht-Park geändert?
chris66 (2023-08-12 20:38:22+00:00): Hi, Datenquelle ist der BBG Webatlas.
Siehe auch die Webseite des Kindergartens https://www.kita-am-park.beelitz.de/
wo als Adresse Karl-Liebknecht-Park 4 angegeben ist.
streckenkundler (2023-08-12 21:34:07+00:00): @foersterp
die Quelle von @criss66 stimmt auch mit den georeferenzierten Adressen Brandenburgs überein: https://geobasis-bb.de/lgb/de/geodaten/liegenschaftskataster/georeferenzierte-adresse/

...einbindbare Quelle dafür für JOSM: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/adressen-in-brandenburg-als-hintergrund-ebene-fur-josm/6679

...eine hier für OSM nutzbare Quelle...

Bei Nutzung von JOSM ist es leichter, diese Quellen einzubinden. Für Fragen stehe ich gerne zur Verfügung.

Sven
foersterp (2023-08-22 09:42:03+00:00): Stimmt ihr habt vollkommen recht. Ich habe da nämlich mal gewohnt, aber anscheinend die Straßen verwechselt. Aber danke für die Infos!
aixbrick (2023-07-03 15:35:10+00:00): Hallo,
bitte zukünftig einen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix benutzen. Das Gebäude ist sowohl auf Luftbildern, als auch in ALKIS noch sichtbar und die Chance hoch, dass das ein anderer Mapper wieder einträgt.
Umgesetzt mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138070086.
Gruß
Frans S (2023-06-27 14:14:46+00:00): Thank you for mapping. We welcome you as a new mapper.
You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
A few issues. You mapped a few buildings very weird by following the tree lines. Please extrapolate the rooflines of those buildings. They are mostly strict rectangular.
I corrected them.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137821743
Archi_Ma (2023-06-29 15:01:46+00:00): Hi Frans S,

Thank you so much for your feedback and useful links.
maro21 (2024-01-21 12:15:18+00:00): This is shop=power_tools
user_5359 (2023-07-05 07:11:11+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1185217670. What is the mean of the tag 停車位地鎖 = yes ?
twF6wdEYwL (2023-07-05 09:32:49+00:00): 就是像這樣在路面上的裝置

https://news.tvbs.com.tw/life/1497480
user_5359 (2023-07-05 09:47:13+00:00): barrier = parking_lock
user_5359 (2023-07-25 06:09:52+00:00): Sorry: is there something wrong with my suggestion? please remember that keys should be in british english.

文本被自動翻譯。
抱歉：我的建議有問題嗎？ 請記住，鑰匙應為英式英語。
kogutowicz-mano (2023-07-25 08:34:29+00:00): Szia!
Mi is volt a forrás, amit használtál? ("napelemek"?) Ugye nem valami jogvédett térképről másoltad ide a körvonalakat?
Colbertson (2023-06-27 16:52:21+00:00): Sveiki. amenity=parking_space vajadzētu būt iekšā amenity=parking, un derētu salīmēt blakus esošas kopā un ar Q nolīdzināt stūrus uz 90 grādiem.
CorruptComputer (2023-06-28 01:29:09+00:00): Hi there, welcome to OpenStreetMap! 

The description you wrote here sounds too much like an advertisement, so I'm going to trim it down a bit. 

I was wondering if you know what license the logo image you used is available under?
CorruptComputer (2023-06-28 01:59:11+00:00): The `image` tag is also not supposed to be a company logo. It is supposed to be an image of the mapped object.

I'll remove that image for now as well. If you want to add a photo of the location I would recommend using Wikimedia Commons to host this image and use the `wikimedia_commons` tag to link it here.

For reference:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:image