piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Beau Jonckers (2025-07-22 21:23:19+00:00): Hallo Pan,
Thanks for your reply. I don’t really understand the reply but maybe I am just missing something. If a whole area (in this case a forest and a meadow) is made out of one line or many lines does not change the position of the nodes which form the boundary of them. (and determines the quality) You and the other OSM users are of course free to add/move/change nodes over any length they can and want to improve. (1meter 10 meter 100 meter is of course not up to me to determine)  A little to the side there is a fence and a strip of grass/scrub between the meadow and the forest. That is now half on one line half on the other. Stuff like that. The line than needs to become forest/grass or meadow/grass. Its all a bit of a hassle in my opinion.  Furthermore I don’t understand why it is for example important that you took satellite imagery as a source for the first 100 meters and somebody else took on the ground knowledge or gps or whatever for the next 100 meters. Why should that cause a split? Why does different source/ quality matter?
I for example have never splitted a road at the end of what I changed just because I only know 1 km of a 10 km road. It just creates more work. (even if I think that my 1 km is good and the other 9 km needs a lot of improvement)

In short leaving everything as one line does not change the quality of nodes you added but enables easy mapping and a clear and clean view of everything. I still don’t see the benefit of splitting ( I do not have a question about the place and or quality of the nodes themselves)

I will see what I will do near Gsteig. Maybe I can find some info about this method online. 
If you could elaborate a little than that would be great.

Thanks

Beau
Pan (2025-07-22 21:29:44+00:00): Thanks for the reply. Wjat I meant is that some portion of the area might have been drawn with one source and some other with one other source and that it is important to be able to distinguish them. Foe instance, one part might have been mapped with and old imagery of Bing in 2016 and another with a newer LIDAR imagery of 2023. These imageries have different offsets, different otho correction and the landscape itself might have changed with the years. There is a lot of value -to me at least- in distinguishing the different segments as per their source.
Beau Jonckers (2025-07-23 19:34:22+00:00): Okay thanks. Now I understand what you mean. I did not use multiply sources so that wasn’t an issue. Furthermore I don’t think anybody would mind if one line consist out of multiply sources. Other users can’t see what sources you used from these lines nor from or changesets or the map itself. Just adding a note with information to the area’s is a lot better for that. Splitting everything doesn’t look clean at all and has only cons. It also makes future mapping harder. That is a lot more important.
Anyways thanks for the information.

Happy mapping.
ferog_v (2025-07-17 06:32:01+00:00): Ha eliminado la relación de la carretera México - Cuernavaca (Cuota), favor de restaurarla.

La Avenida Insurgentes sur desde el anillo periférico y hasta el entronque de Chimalcoyoc está indicada en Datos Viales (SCT) como parte de la Carretera México - Cuernavaca (Cuota). Siendo esta la fuente indicada por la Wiki OSM Red Nacional de Caminos como la que se debe seguir al mapear carreteras.
Este dato pudiese estar a discusión o cambiar en otra actualización de la SCT.
Quixlian (2025-08-07 22:43:04+00:00): Ya se restauró la relación de ruta de carretera (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19438106).
La avenida Insurgentes no forma parte de la ruta de acuerdo con el índice de carreteras de los Datos Viales 2024 de la SCT (https://www.sct.gob.mx/carreteras/direccion-general-de-servicios-tecnicos/datos-viales/2024/), y tampoco aparece en la Red Nacional de Caminos 2024 del Instituto Mexicano del Transporte (http://rnc.imt.mx/).
ferog_v (2025-08-18 17:18:25+00:00): La fuente que citas (https://www.sct.gob.mx/carreteras/direccion-general-de-servicios-tecnicos/datos-viales/2024/), no indica directamente dónde inicia, solo dice que inicia en México (km 0.0) el siguiente punto T. C. México - Cuernavaca (Libre) lo indica en el km 18.65 con las coordenadas 19.264293-99.165781.

En  la página de datos viales (https://datosviales2020.routedev.mx/main) que es una fuente oficial actualizada a 2025 que se puede acceder desde este enlace: https://www.sct.gob.mx/carreteras/direccion-general-de-servicios-tecnicos/datos-viales/2024/.
Se puede observar que la carretera de cuota inicia en el tramo de la Avenida Insurgentes Sur al sur del Anillo Periférico.
Quixlian (2025-08-28 01:41:58+00:00): El enlace que compartiste no se puede abrir. En el índice no se menciona el inicio, pero el gráfico muestra la avenida Insurgentes frente al Centro de Tlalpan sin incluirla como parte de la red. Además, no hay señalización en la calle, ni en la intersección con Periférico ni a lo largo de ese tramo.

Creo que esta evidencia es más convincente que la que se basa en una sola fuente inaccesible. La mayoría de las fuentes y la propia observación en el lugar lo confirman. 

Si esta información solo se puede encontrar en el sitio que mencionas y no hay otras fuentes disponibles, es probable que otro usuario elimine la referencia MEX 95D en el futuro si se vuelve a añadir.
user_5359 (2025-07-16 07:08:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You set the bus stop an the street and move them to another street. I must revert your change set. Please try again!
buy_osmand (2025-07-17 13:25:05+00:00): `created_by:	Vespucci 21.0.4.0`  
pro.   
😎 salutations!
JJIglesias (2025-07-16 17:20:54+00:00): Gracias. Ya la ruta habia sido borrada.
 Toda contribución es bienvenida mientras no afecte el mapa.
Piskvor (2025-07-16 07:57:06+00:00): Zdravím, ani jedna z těch cest už tam není? Tj. ze Sušické nelze projet na kole ze severu na jih? (Ortofoto ČÚZK je občas dost pozadu za skutečným stavem, dokonce i pražská ortofotomapa bývá až o půl roku opožděná)
user_21183540 (2025-07-16 06:57:49+00:00): Why did you reverted it? A simple deletion of the `description` tag would have sufficed to remove the spamy part.
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-16 07:24:09+00:00): Hi KhubsuratInsaan,
thanks for your comment. There is no building here where the company could be located. If you check the company's website mentioned, you’ll see that their headquarters is somewhere else.
Best regards
user_21183540 (2025-07-16 07:45:00+00:00): On the website I see the address "362, Valencia, Mahagun Mascot, E-Tax World, C/o Mr. Honey Jain, Crossings Republik, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201016" in the footer which matches the address given on the node. Also according to GMaps, the apartment complex "Mahagun Mascot" is actually pretty close to the location of the node. Mahagun Mascot is currently not marked on OSM. (Gmaps location of Mahagun Mascot : geo:28.6299744,77.4402308)
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-16 07:47:54+00:00): Furthermore see the "unhelpful" comment of the contributor here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168968181#map=19/28.632680/77.434057
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-16 07:49:40+00:00): @KhubsuratInsaan However, feel free to undo/revert my edit.

Based on the mentioned points, I decided to revert this node.
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-16 07:53:07+00:00): "actually pretty close"? If I haven't overlooked anything, it's several hundred meters away.
user_21183540 (2025-07-16 08:01:08+00:00): Some hundred meters of inaccuracy isn't too bad. I would have reverted if the node was all the way in another city, but this margin of mistake seems like a genuine error instead of a spam.
user_21183540 (2025-07-16 08:02:02+00:00): I would prefer if instead of reverting we would just put a fixme note with all the relevant details.
user_21183540 (2025-07-16 08:05:47+00:00): Yes, I will admit that unhelpful comment was pretty bad. But still we should not rely completely on that, though it is indeed an important factor to consider.
user_21183540 (2025-07-16 08:13:52+00:00): Also, that area doesn't have a lot of roads. If the person was relying on the roads to find the apartment, then I can see how they would have missed a road, which resulted in an error of hundred of meters.
user_21183540 (2025-07-16 11:45:16+00:00): I have reverted it and made the necessary changes.
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-17 06:39:31+00:00): 👍
Piskvor (2025-07-16 07:32:57+00:00): Zdravím a díky za vylepšení mapy.

Pokud je v ulici zákaz vjezdu, je vhodné použít typ značky, nikoli název (v tomto případě Zákaz vjezdu je B1). Dovolil jsem si i upravit tu ulici, na kterou zákaz platí, jako vehicle=no (většina navigací se dívá spíše na značení ulic, než na značky podél.)

Viz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168998440/#map=19/49.959430/14.058046 
Mapování zdar,
Piskvor
Kovoschiz (2025-07-16 08:36:52+00:00): Please don't upload personal test data to a live public prod database. This is vandalism.
Koreller (2025-08-25 22:13:59+00:00): Hello, thanks for contributing in OSM in North Korea. What is the source that helps you add these shops and POI?
BCNorwich (2025-07-17 05:29:07+00:00): Hi, I've reverted this change because it dragged other features out of alignment and was itself self-intersecting.

Regards Bernard
Rado20010205 (2025-07-18 16:41:03+00:00): what is the reason for the removal of these features
Tjuro (2025-07-18 17:23:59+00:00): Hello Rado20010205,

The changes you made were not of sufficient quality.
•	Using incorrect/made up names
•	Duplication in network
•	Using “pavement type” key
•	Incorrect alignment
•	Not using local imagery
You also did not provide any response to the comments made on changeset or in the forum thread made because of your actions:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/osm-voor-blinden-en-slechtzienden/132685

My recommendations for you are to start small, start on less buzzy area’s. For example, small towns or suburbs. Work up to knowing different tags and mapping techniques.
After this you can revisit making changes in this area.

Greetings,

Tjuro
Prusaker (2025-07-16 11:00:02+00:00): Простите, а зачем такое количество дорог обозначать как secondary? 

Это совершенно противоречит самому смыслу тега secondary в Osm Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dsecondary
Prusaker (2025-07-16 11:02:41+00:00): В ряде случае было бы куда уместнее оставить класс дорог tertiary.
Prusaker (2025-07-16 11:08:04+00:00): Слуцкую и Комсомольскую улицы можно было вполне сделать как tertriary, они не выполняют такой транзитной роли, чтобы быть secondary, тем более что в этом месте нет транзитной дороги класса secondary.
felipeeugenio (2025-07-16 14:08:50+00:00): Hola. Varias de sus ediciones se refieren a áreas verdes que, o usó mal los tags o simplemente no existen. Vamos a corregirlas.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168997440
felipeeugenio (2025-07-16 14:09:34+00:00): Peor por favor tomar en cuenta que OSM es un proyecto que debe reflejar la realidad en terreno. Es posible que sus ediciones estén orientadas al uso de alguna app en particular?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168997440
TinteXD (2025-07-17 05:02:30+00:00): Hola
Muchas gracias, y perdon por el desastre que realice. 

tendre mucho mas cuidado en toda actualizacion que realice 
que tenga buen dia
felipeeugenio (2025-07-17 13:18:48+00:00): ok, gracias por la actitud. Vi sus nuevas ediciones. No toda área verde es un parque. Es un concepto un poco largo de explicar, pero básicamente se trata de si el área verde permite que la gente circule y esté ahí y sirva como recinto recreacional. Si no son landuse=grass.

saludos
TinteXD (2025-07-17 14:10:04+00:00): muchas gracias por la guia, en ese caso solo el sector al rededor de la junta de vecinos y la esquina de americo aranda blumer con las orquidias cumplen con ese requisito, debido a el plan de recuperacion de la junta de vecino en esos lugares,  cambie a grass el otro extremo, que solo cuenta con area de verde .
buy_osmand (2025-07-17 13:21:23+00:00): 😍💕
Syl (2025-07-16 13:22:54+00:00): Bonjour, pour les moyens de paiement le wiki conseille de ne pas utiliser des attributs généraux si on en met des plus détaillés : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:*#Generic

L'ajout de payment:cards=yes et payment:credit_cards=yes n'est pas vraiment pertinent comme vous mettez le détail des cartes acceptées.
TeamDELKO (2025-07-16 13:29:32+00:00): Bonjour,

Ok je comprends, je le note pour le modifier sur l'ensemble des établissements.

Pendant que j'y suis, voyez-vous d'autres attributs intéressants à ajouter ?

J'aimerais clore le sujet d'ici peu mais je veux vraiment que tout soit bien respecté.
yelisey90 (2025-08-01 14:52:15+00:00): Hi! highway=busway should be used for roads that are *only* accessible to buses, that is, there are inaccessible for any other mean of transport? including taxis and bikes. As far as I know, there are no such roads in Georgia. So I reverted the change of the type; but also I've added access=no tag. Apparently access:lanes is not enough for some software...
LevanGo (2025-08-02 16:03:53+00:00): this road is Bus lane. only buses can access it. According to Georgian low bus lines can access specific type of taxes and mopeds as well.
yelisey90 (2025-08-02 16:34:16+00:00): "According to Georgian low bus lines can access specific type of taxes and mopeds as well." 
Yes, this is precisely why bus lanes in Georgia should be mapped not as highway=busway, but as highway=service with access=no + bus=designated + psv=designated + taxi=designated + bicycle=designated/yes
Brickblock1 (2025-07-16 09:10:26+00:00): This is a tram not a light rail line
fortera_au (2025-08-01 23:46:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
KKS (2025-07-17 09:51:06+00:00): Який провулок?
Чи всі провулки було приєднано до вулиці Світязької?

Де пруфи? Чи знов твір на вільну тему "я так бачу"?
SomeoneElse (2025-07-17 07:41:25+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1414082973 was newly added here, and you've added it to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19341660 (the "Ancient Trees Walk"), but I've also added it to the Way of Roses and 688 cycle routes as there was an obvious gap in those too.
Best Regards,
Andy
fortera_au (2025-08-01 23:47:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
Edelsalami (2025-07-28 13:12:51+00:00): Hallo even666 alias Streetview247, du hast deinem CS den Kommentar "Gärten am Börkhauser Feld richtig eingetragen" gegeben, aber wenn man deine Bearbeitung prüft, so hast du vorallem die Gärten auf Flächen ausgedehnt, die keine Gärten sind. Magst du bitte erklären, warum du so viele Flächen fehlerhaft als Gärten gemappt hast?  Danke. Gruß
olo81 (2025-07-18 22:19:35+00:00): Wykasowałeś las. Obszary chronione to nie jest to samo co obszar lasu.  Powinno to być na osobnych liniach. 
Kolejna sprawa to klasyfikacja obszaru chronionego. Masz tu opis: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area#Classification

I nie jest to leisure=nature_reserve, to nie jest rezerwat przyrody. Już sama nazwa, jaką dałeś, to mówi.
C2oc4 (2025-07-22 06:54:04+00:00): Czyli powinno być tak jak teraz zrobiłeś?
olo81 (2025-07-22 08:14:38+00:00): tak
C2oc4 (2025-07-22 12:45:59+00:00): ok w takim razie będę się na tym wzorował
NeisBot (2025-07-16 08:16:43+00:00): Hi Hui 6789, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added tax-related government tag and updated address details for a building"

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-16 08:11:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13003768180

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kudziu (2025-07-17 06:23:59+00:00): Witam. Czy problemem znalezionym przez BOTA jest podanie tylko samego nazwiska patrona ulicy Domańskiego? (pełna nazwa to Księdza Bolesława Domańskiego).
Martinligabue (2025-07-16 09:10:09+00:00): ciao, grazie per la modifica, la annullo per segnare meglio il tiro a segno, se ti interessa poi ti spiego come modificare meglio openstreetmap

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169002668
hNdrX_ (2025-07-17 21:35:43+00:00): Hej Brabakbengel!
Ist die Sperrung zeitlich begrenzt?
Du hast es als 'private' getaggt - d.h. es gibt Leute, die den Weg weiterhin nutzen dürfen/können? Sonst wäre access=no korrekt, wenn komplett gesperrt.
Brabakbengel (2025-07-18 08:45:52+00:00): Moin,
die Argumentation verstehe ich.
Die Wege sind ja physisch stehts vorhanden und ich denke für Anlieger frei. Die Zufahrten dieses Weges sind mit einer neuen Beschilderung und Toren ausgestattet worden. Die den Zugang für den normalen Verkehr verweigern. Den genauen Wortlaut kann ich sonst bis nächste Woche nochmal in Erfahrung bringen.
Brabakbengel (2025-07-21 06:07:36+00:00): So, die alten Schilder wurden durch "offizielle" Schilder ersetzt
Die aktuelle Beschilderung besagt nun:
Verkehrszeichen 259 "Verbot für Fußgänger" - darunter steht Betriebsweg

Des weiteren ist am Roßdam der Radweg gleisseitig beidseitig befahrbar. Das Radverkehrsnetz Radroute: Alter Elbtunnel führt auch dort entlang.
hNdrX_ (2025-07-23 17:48:22+00:00): Dann würde ich den Fußweg als 'private' taggen und auf diese Konversation verweisen in der Beschreibung oder Notiz - falls sich jemand wundert. Könntest auch noch 'check_date' einfügen - falls es sich nochmal ändern sollte, kann man nachvollziehen, wann das letzte Mal aktualisiert wurde.
infeeeee (2025-07-16 16:13:07+00:00): Szia!

Ezzel a ponttal kapcsolatban írok: https://osm.org/node/782476239

Facebook oldalak címét nem a website hanem contact:facebook mezőben tároljuk. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:facebook

További jó térképezést!
infeeeee (2025-07-16 16:13:31+00:00): Bocsi, rossz link, ez akart lenni: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/782476239
Leo Slager (2025-07-16 10:23:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
woodpeck (2025-07-16 09:59:59+00:00): maraf24, if you revert a changeset please always state a reason. It appears that the thread https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/stosowanie-tagu-highway-trunk-w-polsce/122106 came to the conclusion that roads marked as red in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Pl:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk#Zestawienie_dr%C3%B3g_2 are ok to be marked as trunk roads and that the edit you have reverted is in line with the community consensus, meaning your revert would violate community consensus, or am I misreading something?
maraf24 (2025-07-16 10:52:53+00:00): The thread you mentioned is currently on-going discussion. Nothing is decided yet. There is no conclusion, and the basis for this edit is only proposal given in your second link.
Additionaly this proposal falsely stated that bicycles on this road were not allowed.
pavvv (2025-07-16 12:08:16+00:00): > The thread you mentioned is currently on-going discussion. Nothing is decided yet. There is no conclusion, and the basis for this edit is only proposal given in your second link.

Everything has been decided but the user doesn't know that because they didn't read the thread.

> Additionaly this proposal falsely stated that bicycles on this road were not allowed.

Artykuł 33 PoRD: "Kierujący rowerem lub hulajnogą elektryczną jest obowiązany korzystać z drogi dla rowerów, drogi dla pieszych i rowerów lub pasa ruchu dla rowerów, jeżeli są one wyznaczone dla kierunku, w którym się porusza lub zamierza skręcić."
woodpeck (2025-07-16 12:29:56+00:00): maraf24, please read the thread and then say if you still believe that "nothing has been decided yet".
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-16 08:41:03+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13003864304
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13003864305
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13003864306

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2025-07-16 14:42:29+00:00): Hi :)

bitte lass Flurnamen wie hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9992591922 auf den nodes. Wiesen und Felder ändern sich viel zu häufig, als dass diese hilfreiche Träger dieser Namen wären. 

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169001157
ADAC Touristische InfoSysteme (2025-07-18 07:23:51+00:00): I reverted your changes back to place=country, because place=yes is wrong. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place
quantenschaum (2025-08-07 09:27:47+00:00): Hi, ist disused=yes richtig? Er ist ja noch als Marke zur Navigation verwendbar, nur die Beleuchtung ist ausgefallen und wird repariert, das Problem: nur mit disused=yer werden die Feuersektoren auf openseamap trotzdem dargestellt, genau deswegen hatte ich ja die Farben rausgenommen, jetzt sieht es auf der Karte wieder so aus, als wäre er wieder in Betrieb. disused=yes ist vielleicht von der Logik her sauber, funktioniert aber praktisch so nicht. Außerdem impliziert disused=yes dass gar kein Feuer mehr installiert ist und somit wären alls seamark:lights zu löschen. Nur die Farben abzuklemmen, hatte schon einen Sinn.

Gruß, Adam.
mueschel (2025-08-07 18:30:34+00:00): Ein einzelner Buchstabe im Tag um es "abzuklemmen" ist keine gute Idee, das sieht wie ein einfacher Tippfehler aus. 
Die üblichen "Lifecylce Prefixes" sollten schon verwendet werden. 

Wenn alle seamark:light:* Tags "bis auf Weiteres" nicht zutreffen, kannst du sie auch einfach löschen und durch eine Note ersetzen. Wenn er wieder in Betrieb geht lassen sich die Tags einfach wiederherstellen.
NeisBot (2025-07-16 08:51:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 06:22:16+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/169005719
VictorIE (2025-07-20 14:12:09+00:00): Hi,

highway=tertiary is usually used for main roads that connect villages, etc. You might have a look here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ireland/Roads

In general, roads with L and 5 numbers would be local tertiary roads and we normally mark them as highway=unclassifed or highway=residential.