piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-03 19:51:08+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Osiedle Praciaki":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305452599
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305452607

"Fabryczna Boczna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305452729

"Osiedle Młynne":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305452751
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305452796
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305452803
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305452816
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305452822

"Osiedle Lubańskie":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305452753

"Osiedle Kolebisko":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305452758

"Kazimierza Tetmajera":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305452764

"Osiedle Szymany":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305452766

"Osiedle Zawodzie":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305452775

"Osiedle Gorcowe":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305452797

"Osiedle Kotelnica":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305452807

"Osiedle Niwa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305452817

"Witkowskie":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305452879

"3-ego Maja":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305453027

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
VLD549 (2024-09-23 19:10:58+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify the name change from Donkershoeve to Seniorencamping Donkershoeve .
Could you indicate why the part of seniorencamping should be included? I can't find it on the site at all.

Thank you in advance.
m4lvin (2024-09-23 19:39:49+00:00): There is a big banner at the entrance which includes this. Here is a low quality picture I found online, maybe later I have a better one: https://imgur.com/a/Gc4WECU

I have been there and in general it is a very quite place, so I think this is useful to add.
VLD549 (2024-10-04 12:33:30+00:00): Ok, thank you!
aceman444 (2024-08-31 10:18:48+00:00): Hi, the parking at Bernard Apartmany is awfully imprecise (I'll improve it from aerial imagery), but otherwise great additions, like the piped stream. Thanks!
grin (2024-08-31 12:15:40+00:00): Ah it's not _awfully_ imprecise but the whole area was sketchy and I added the parking relative to the buildings (since there was no parking marked at all). Otherwise I had to move about everything and I have not got the source for that, aerial was too old and GPS didn't get a good fix, and I was tired to walk around the block and part of the building/parking was blocked by building machines and fence. I wanted to record the park place numbers since it's almost impossible to find the parking number in the dark but I lost the motivation (we only been there for 2 days). If you make it better: excellent, thank you!
aceman444 (2024-08-31 12:33:07+00:00): Yes, is seems the area was rebuilt. There is 5 years old imagery of Ortofotomozaika SR where the parking does not exist. But there exists Ortofotomozaika of 2022, also ESRI that has the parking. mapBox imagery even has the building in different shape. It seems it was all rebuilt.

I understand the building contains apartments/flats for long-term residents, not for tourist. At least the website does not say any thing like that. It is also not tagged tourism=apartments. But you added the parking as access=customers. So what customers are those if on the tourists?
grin (2024-08-31 15:20:48+00:00): It is _being_ rebuilt: the apartments building is done, but the surrounding areas are construction, I just didn't have the energy to walk around after a long day of those hills. :-)

I don't know what its official status is (or why do you believe it's not for tourists) but it is full with apartments to rent (under various names, some of them running separate businesses as we heard from other tourists; you can find a lot of those on bookingcom), and visibly it has been designed for that, since there is a touchless keycard system (PIN enter, codelockers, keycards) and a porter service at the entrance. The parking spaces are numbered and assigned to the apartments.

The customers are the tourists and there were plenty when I was there, and if you're right then also the owners ("private"), but I cannot sort them out one by one. IMO "customers" is the best way to show that if you aren't belong there (tourist or owner) you can't park there. The best if you go there and ask the porter, or the owner of the building.
aceman444 (2024-09-01 21:15:51+00:00): It is because the website of the building at https://www.apartmany-bernard.sk/ only offers selling the apartments, not renting to tourists. Of course, the permanent owners can then rent them to tourists individually, which is then facilitated via the porter service (that part is on the website too). So if you confirmed that some are indeed rented to tourists, we can now tag it somehow. But not the whole building is for tourists.
grin (2024-09-03 14:11:35+00:00): If you believe you could make tagging better then please do. For users it may be important to be able to find their apartments (it would have helped me, and those people I helped there), but I trust that its your country and you know it better than I. :-) 
Tagging individual apartments (and I guess there are a lot of those) may be messy but more precise. Do as you think it's best (or even better: consult local community). Thanks!
aceman444 (2024-10-06 20:55:20+00:00): Yeah, it would be messy and even hard to find names of individual apartments that are rented. But I have made at least one POI so that it is clear that some apartments for tourists are found here. Thanks for the information.
seattlefyi (2024-08-03 21:27:51+00:00): Thanks for cross-referencing this with your hike, and making the edit!
aseidel (2024-08-06 07:02:12+00:00): Liebe:r ChMenges,
bitte bei den Stufen vor/nach dieser Brücke einmal das Tagging korrigieren: Am Anfangs- und Endpunkt braucht es ein barrier=step (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier=step?uselang=de); bei der Linie für die Brücke (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305455886), wird barrier=step ebenso wie access=yes nicht benötigt.
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
Joseph R P (2024-08-07 18:58:48+00:00): Road numbers very rarely reflect a road's place in the highway network of the US. In the age of digital maps and GPS, road numbers on minor collector roads like these are a relic and mostly reflect how a road is maintained (in this case, by the state) rather than how important it is. Route 96 only links to some small rural neighborhoods around East Boothbay, without any connection to other secondary or tertiary roads. Ignoring the designation, that is enough to conclude that secondary is overkill for a no-outlet rural highway, and small-scale edits like these don't necessarily need to be discussed.
otji73 (2024-08-06 14:19:51+00:00): and what is the name of the street?
AristoKat (2024-08-06 18:25:09+00:00): Ian Epton Street, like I entered in the edit, does that not show?
otji73 (2024-08-06 21:04:27+00:00): Right - visible with high zoom. I have made the access road larger.

Thanks for your feedback!
waldyrious (2025-01-09 22:53:00+00:00): Hi Tuiui! In this changeset you added a tree with designation "Acer hippocastanum", but that doesn't seem to be a valid species name. Did you perhaps mean "Aesculus hippocastanum" instead?
Tuiui (2025-01-11 10:04:09+00:00): You're right, thanks!
waldyrious (2025-01-12 00:59:23+00:00): Great! I have now added the species tag again (it had been removed without explanation by user_5589) with the value "Aesculus hippocastanum". Cheers!
eggie (2024-08-09 21:17:59+00:00): Hoi Serbul,

Het bruggetje heb ik aangepast naar een duiker.
Mocht er een brug zijn gekomen laat het even weten.
MVG
eggie
yrtimiD (2024-08-05 11:37:11+00:00): Hi and welcome!
Since you started adding buildings, I'd like to ensure you are aware of aerial images alignment problem and that before use they must be aligned to existing gpx records.
yrtimiD (2024-08-05 11:38:57+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_aerial_imagery
brownperson (2024-08-05 14:35:21+00:00): Hey, thank you. Yes, I'm aware and used GPX records as anchors for aerial images.
Sanniu (2025-12-18 05:54:16+00:00): Hi, you've added house numbers without street names, making it useless for automatic search.
Can you update with appropriate street names, please?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-03 21:10:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12090975727
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305453109

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
DavidFactChex (2024-08-03 21:21:14+00:00): This reverts #154785964 by urmommy
DavidFactChex (2024-08-03 21:20:31+00:00): This changeset reverts CS #154786180 by urmommy
NieWnen (2024-08-03 21:33:54+00:00): Hej, jeśli to jest ciąg pieszo-rowerowy to powinien być nieco inaczej otagowany. 
Edytor iD niestety nie wspiera tego schematu tagowania (jako szablonu), ale na wiki znajdziesz więcej informacji jak to oznaczyć za pomocą tagów:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w
StefanHRT (2024-08-04 06:26:16+00:00): #deletedriveways
kitsee (2024-08-04 21:28:37+00:00): Hi there, OS maps and Google Maps cannot be used in any way when contributing to OSM. This is due to their licences being incompatible the OSM licence and could make OSM open to being sued for copyright infringement.
kitsee (2024-08-04 21:32:13+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ordnance_Survey
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google
A_Snail (2024-08-09 22:03:13+00:00): The use of OS Maps and Google Maps were just to double check the accuracy of the information provided to ensure the routes were leagal rights of way.  The data submitted used track recordings made using OsmAnd+ app and photos of key locations taken on the mobile phone to provide the extra information and from talking to land owners.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-07 03:00:15+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154915304
DavidFactChex (2024-08-03 21:35:06+00:00): IDK why box is so big
DP24PH (2024-08-04 10:46:07+00:00): Greetings in Veritas et Fortitudo, Pro Deo et Patria!

You might have restored POIs in a manner where it would span almost the entire globe. Kindly restore on a per-country and per-city basis to avoid interfering with our fellow local OpenStreetMappers and GIS operators. More information can be found at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset.

Your kind understanding is highly appreciated. Thank you very much.

DP24
Fizzie-DWG (2024-08-05 23:05:16+00:00): Why did you restore these POIs in their deleted locations, then move them half way around the world? Graeme Fitzpatrick, Moderator,
OSMF Data Working Group
DavidFactChex (2024-08-08 19:44:53+00:00): The large bounding box may have been a Level0 error. All the POIs are in Pinole. -David
Fizzie-DWG (2024-08-05 23:10:32+00:00): What is your source for these business names, please, as you have listed Bing AErial & names don't show on that! You've also mapped a school location in a carpark? Graeme Fitzpatrick, Moderator, OSMF Data Working Group
DavidFactChex (2024-08-08 19:50:22+00:00): My source for these names is local knowledge from friends, as well as Apple Maps. As for the school, THAT IS IT'S LOCATION. If you want proof, go to it's website, Bigminds2e.org. Or use satellite imagery from Apple Maps to see where the school is. China House is next to this location as well. Both of them are right next to the carpark, but the map shows the carpark as being larger then it actually is. -David
Allison P (2024-08-10 17:24:21+00:00): You cannot use other maps as a source if they are protected by copyright. This includes Apple Maps.
DavidFactChex (2024-08-15 21:18:49+00:00): Ahh ok. I was just saying Apple Maps as an example. I did not use it as a source for the school.
StefanHRT (2024-08-04 06:26:01+00:00): #deletedriveways
jeslop (2024-08-04 09:45:45+00:00): Segundo a Relación da Rede Autonómica de Estradas de Galicia (RAEGA) a denominación de esta estrada é Bertamiráns-Negreira. Ese é o nome que debe aparecer.

Saúdos.

Jesús López
Fizzie-DWG (2024-08-11 05:57:48+00:00): Again, how are you adding street names from aerial imagery? & why "Wisteria Rump"?
DavidFactChex (2024-08-15 21:21:54+00:00): If you check the sources it is not from ærial imagery but rather a note. Wisteria Rump is because it is an offshoot of Wisteria Road which loops back and is short, so is called a rump.
NieWnen (2024-08-07 18:55:16+00:00): DDR, czy ścieżka pieszo-rowerowa (C-13/16)? 
Jeśli to drugie, to poprzednie oznaczenie było poprawne i należy je przywrócić:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-03 22:42:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Turystyczna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2473358755
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2473359565
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2473363306
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2473364118
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8378593197

"Na Owczarnie":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2473360895

"Żeglarska":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12091081255
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12091081256

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2024-08-07 14:34:09+00:00): Hi.  Your request to review your mappings. 
Fine mapped.  It is difficult to decide which road to map. Focus on highways connecting settlements, Where multiple traces go to same direction, just map one. 
Measure the width of a trace by drawing a round building between the shoulders. If it stays below 2 mtr tag it as a path. Otherwise, unclassified. No need to tag highways within (small) settlements as residential. Just unclassified.
Except for main highways, the highways are mostly unpaved. You can add that to the roads. 
Best regards
Ratcatcher1999 (2024-08-03 23:04:50+00:00): Die Grünfläche des Grundstücks, wurden genau kartografiert, was nicht mit dem Besitzer abgesprochen ist. Der Zeltplatz ist nicht für die Öffentlichkeit
puma515 (2024-08-05 01:03:26+00:00): wen der Hof bei Googel Maps nicht öffentlich aufrufbar sein soll den empfehle ich euch das bei Googel löschen zu lassen. OSM und Andre Kartendienste haben nix miteinandre zu tun. 
Bei Googel findet man zu diesem Ort bewertungen mit Bilder die das Grundstück sehr genau zeigen.
 https://www.google.de/maps/place/Hof+K%C3%B6hnholz/@54.4054355,9.9111863,17z/data=!4m6!3m5!1s0x47b300c6ab79264f:0xc4d4bd74b0d146b9!8m2!3d54.405537!4d9.9102118!16s%2Fg%2F11hdb0krzr?entry=ttu
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-03 23:10:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12091017664

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pktiuk (2024-08-04 10:45:07+00:00): Dzięki za informację. Zaraz to poprawię.
MichS (2024-08-04 05:53:35+00:00): Hallo,

bei track sollte ein access=private gesetze werden. und nicht private=yes.
Ich werde den access setzen.

MFG
eggie (2024-08-04 05:59:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-09 13:49:54+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625374318/history has shop = garden that was added in this edit
Is it shop=garden_centre ? If not, how it differs from shop=garden_centre? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=garden_centre
shinterro (2025-12-10 02:39:45+00:00): Hi! Thanks as always, should not be garden and will fix shortly. 

To be sure, are you aware of any better fit for a business that only sells dirt, soil and groundcovers? There are several similar such places around this area.

I'm tempted to try shop=agrarian with maybe... agrarian=landscaping? Only trouble is that I can't seem to pin any good examples.
Benoît C MdP (2024-08-06 14:37:26+00:00): Bonjour Gourlaysama

Sur l'avenue des Ternes, l'aménagement cyclable est protégé par endroits par des balisettes (comme sur la rue de Rivoli) ou par une bande de stationnement (comme sur Arago). C'est donc dans ces cas plutôt une piste qu'une bande car il y a une séparation physique avec la circulation générale. Sauf explication complémentaire de ta part, je vais donc rétablir la situation préexistante.

Bonne continuation.

Benoît
sw_uwu (2024-08-04 22:09:15+00:00): Hi, you seem to have incorrectly edited the road and playground. Also, please dont dox yourself
sw_uwu (2024-08-04 22:01:39+00:00): Hi, I have reverted this because you changed the beach into a building.
Enock4seth (2024-08-14 15:04:51+00:00): Take note of the inner ways of multipolygons to avoid tagging them as something they are not, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305485071/history , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1307742834 and others
jakecopp (2024-08-08 07:33:00+00:00): Hi Tanoh, could I check if the orange barriers blocking the cycleway have been removed? If not then I think the cycleway should be considered as still under construction (ie. unsafe to be used by cyclists) and this should be reverted.
Tanoh (2024-08-08 14:50:27+00:00): It's possible that I marked it incorrectly, StreetComplete only said something about it being completed which I interpreted as the road was constructed. But it might not be opened yet.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-08-05 10:42:56+00:00): Est-ce une nouvelle piste cyclable sur le bord de l'ancien golf? Est-ce que les barrières sont démantelées? Merci de valider.
chinook17 (2024-08-12 00:10:34+00:00): Salut,
Ça fait quelques années depuis que je suis passé dessus mais la barrière était ouverte. J'ai remarqué aussi que le sentier était sur la carte vélo de la région métropolitaine, produite par Vélo Québec (même si je sais que cette carte est bourrée d'erreurs!)
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-08-12 00:29:30+00:00): ok super!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 02:44:10+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164877749
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 04:45:16+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165053304
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-04 05:40:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12091323438

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
AndresDuhour (2024-11-15 19:35:47+00:00): Hola! Buenas tardes, estoy viendo algunos cambios en los que se ha agregado la abreviatura de varias palabras. Te quería comentar que en OSM los nombres de calles se agregan sin abreviar, y muchas personas buscamos corregir estos errores.
Te comparto el artículo correspondiente en la wiki. ¡Saludos! Andrés
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Abreviaturas_(no_hacer_esto)
j0k4i (2024-11-16 02:17:28+00:00): Buenas! No estaba al tanto de lo que me comentas. Tomo nota. Voy a corregirlo.
AndresDuhour (2024-11-16 11:23:59+00:00): Hola! Buenísimo, yo corregí algunas y también y revisé las etiquetas de la numeración. El nombre de la calle tiene que estar escrito igual en la etiqueta addr:street que se coloca en los extremos de las líneas de numeración. 
Saludos!
j0k4i (2024-11-16 21:13:10+00:00): Buenas! Tomo nota.
berndw (2024-08-10 13:18:52+00:00): Hi, zur Info

Ich habe dieses Changeset, und andere, revertiert da deine Änderungen die Fehler des anderen Mappers nicht behoben haben. Nicht gemeint ist damit der Troisdorfer ;-)

iD ist meiner Meinung nach als Editor für 3D-Mapping nicht geeignet.

Mein Changeset mit dem Revert aller vorherigen ist:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155061935
pitscheplatsch (2024-08-04 07:29:10+00:00): Hi Mourick, willkommen bei OSM.

Das name-Tag sollte eher wie wie hier beschrieben verwendet werden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name 

Könnte es für den Way angepasst werden? https://osm.org/way/221857401

Danke & Viele Grüße
mottiger (2024-08-04 07:15:23+00:00): sorry, wrong CS comment.
unglued polygon from highway
Nzau (2024-08-09 09:00:56+00:00): Bonjour Eric,

Merci pour ta réactivité de contribution pour ce nouveau chemin en LHR. 
Je me suis permis de modifier les tags pour qu'ils correspondent plus au terrain et aux autres chemins ruraux qui sont aménagés de la sorte.

Bonne journée, et au plaisir d'en discuter si besoin.
Enzo B.
EricG14 (2024-08-19 12:44:03+00:00): Bonjour Enzo,

Merci pour ta contribution.
Ce chemin est identifié comme "voie verte" sur le terrain par les panneaux C115.
Du coup les tags que j'avais rajouté : (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Voies_vertes) serait plus adapté en ce qui concerne l'aménagement sans la notion de revêtement.
Bonne journée
Nzau (2024-08-19 15:58:48+00:00): Merci pour ton retour,

Effectivement, un autre contributeur m'en a également informé juste ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4380291#map=16/49.26253/-0.47085&layers=N

Pour les tags deux options possibles : 
highway=track + motor_vehicle=agricultural + bicyle=designated + foot=designated + traffic_sign=FR:C115 

Ou 
highway=path + motor_vehicle=agricultural + bicyle=designated +foot=designated + traffic_sign=FR:C115

De mon côté je crois que je préfère la deuxième option puisque les panneaux C115 sont présents.
Mais @divaddivag semble préférer la première option puisque cela reste avant tout un chemin agricole.

Une option te paraît elle la meilleure ? Peut-être qu'il faudrait poser la question sur le forum, le problème à déjà du se poser ailleurs.

Au plaisir d'en discuter,
Enzo
Nzau (2024-08-21 06:50:56+00:00): Bonjour Eric,

La communauté OSM semble avoir tranché via un sujet récent : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/une-piste-cyclable-nest-pas-un-sentier/26366/23

Et même si quelques points restent à débattre, l'utilisation conforme semble être : 'highway=track' + foot/bicycle=designated + traffic_sign=FR:C115
(je vais effectuer les modifications qui conviennent).

Merci pour ton implication,
Enzo
dmlls (2025-08-10 11:04:46+00:00): Hallo Amon8lu3,

ich war vor Kurzem hier und das sah einfach wie eine leisure=outdoor_seating (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Doutdoor_seating), nicht wie ein Biergarten aus. Die aktuelle Tagging führt auch zu einer Duplizierung von Tags mit dem Café selbst, was zu Fehlern führen könnte (z.B. ein Objekt wird aktualisiert, das andere aber nicht). Meinst du, wir können das aktualisieren?

Viele Grüße,
Diego
Messinian (2024-08-04 07:51:28+00:00): relation for CR169 created in changeset 154799304. oops.
Messinian (2024-08-04 07:50:06+00:00): this changeset creates relation for CR169, not CR 145.
CoyKoi (2024-08-06 10:26:36+00:00): Hi mapnerd, similar issue in this changeset to what was brought up by ❤️‍🔥 for changeset 154877622. The service ways through the carpark at Moselle Rd/Waipareira Ave did not need to be split into separate ways for each direction. This should only be done when there is a clear physical distinction and distance between each direction, for example dual carriageways.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154799341
CoyKoi (2024-08-08 04:56:07+00:00): I have simplified the highways around the Pit Stop
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154799341
osmviborg (2024-08-04 08:09:14+00:00): This is a 'camp_site' not 'meadow'. Please read the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=meadow
Jenseblume (2024-08-04 08:26:28+00:00): This is a campside with meadow :-) surface grass could be an Option. Although some parts are with scrub. What do you think?
osmviborg (2024-08-04 08:34:32+00:00): Don't map 'landuse' inside a 'camp_site'.
Jenseblume (2024-08-04 08:37:33+00:00): Please give a reason.