piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Dodko (2023-12-01 18:19:14+00:00): Pozrite si aj dokumentáciu k https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dreligion
prípadne office=parish
martianfreeloader (2023-11-19 10:46:39+00:00): Hi,
You changed this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1171322111 from highway=pedestrian to highway=footway. But there is a bus going along this way. I'm changing it back to highway=pedestrian

Cheers
eggie (2023-11-14 16:00:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  foot=yes is default op een fietspad.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
habi (2024-10-21 09:58:31+00:00): Die Öffnungszeiten "Su-Fr 22:00-22:00" erscheinen mir hier falsch.
chnuessli (2024-10-21 14:44:21+00:00): Offizielle Öffnungszeiten eingefügt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158173794
habi (2024-10-21 17:47:21+00:00): Ich habe in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158181198 die Bindestriche korrigiert.
eggie (2023-11-14 16:03:33+00:00): Dag Jabaad   Het is gemapt als een highway=track (Voor landbouwvoertuigen)  De laagste categorie.
Er zal vast geen fietsverbod zijn.
Beter dus geen bicycle=no op wegen gaan taggen die minder geschikt zijn om te fietsen.
Ik pas even wat aan. 
MVG
eggie
CurlingMan13 (2023-11-14 23:27:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in full.  Do not map features incorrectly, especially ones that don't exist.
aceman444 (2024-01-07 00:23:31+00:00): Dobry den, prosim ale budovy zakreslovat podla ich podorysu, nie podla toho kde sa nahodou na snimkach premieta ich strecha. Idealne si podlozit aj vrstvu katastra, aby ste si vsimli rozdiely. Dakujem
00-sq (2023-11-14 16:07:52+00:00): Not sure how the bounding box got this big
limes11 (2023-11-14 17:09:52+00:00): Wenn wir hier schon so ein riesiges Changeset haben, die Frage:

Können diese Namen nicht weg? 

Es sind Beschreibungen, die Eigenschaft eines Hochwasserrückhaltebeckens (<- korrekte Schreibweise ohne Hyphen) ergibt sich (sollte sich) aus den Tags (ergeben).

Cheers
derloris (2023-11-14 17:32:42+00:00): Hab ich auch überlegt. Habe es dann für den (wenn auch unwahrscheinlichen) Fall gelassen, falls es irgendwo wirklich auch als Eigenname so benannt ist. Von mir aus kann es aber (bei allen entsprechend als Rückhaltebecken getaggten Becken) gerne gelöscht werden.

LG
arjunaraoc (2024-01-04 05:05:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
Check my update for minor issues: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145864216
Happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144016780
VictorIE (2023-11-15 21:37:38+00:00): Hi,

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/ is complaining about buildings over-lapping buildings in Buttercrane Shopping Centre.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1223496490
Using indoor=room instead of building=yes might be better. Have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286606278#map=17/54.65595/-5.91831
jonnymccullagh (2023-11-15 22:39:35+00:00): Agree - I think I did that in a hurry and haven't been mapping as much lately. I will fix on Thursday. Thanks for pinging me.
arjunaraoc (2024-01-04 05:01:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144017660
sjwhitak (2025-07-26 00:24:56+00:00): You've labeled the ways as footway=commons, but I see footway=path as more accurate. I also used updated Bing & RI Aerial photography (Spring 2024) for updated routes. Changeset 169481348
gpstracks (2023-11-14 17:20:50+00:00): Peak added.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144018411

Thank You.
CharliePlett (2024-02-07 19:08:48+00:00): Hi, I'm Charlie from Spanish Lookout. From where did you get the street name for Roy Aldana Farm Road?
arjunaraoc (2024-01-04 05:00:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144018562
MikeN (2023-11-14 17:59:57+00:00): Hi, I took a look at this but cannot see what was wrong with the original stop sign placement.
pgerendl (2023-11-15 03:45:36+00:00): Hi, thankyou for going through the edit and reviewing the changeset. There was one stop sign missing at other intersection. We have corrected it in changeset:  144033989. 
Regards,
pgerendl
silversurfer83 (2023-11-15 20:05:42+00:00): Hi :)

sieht erstmal ok aus. Kleine Schritte :)
Mit den Luftbildern und Kataster von NRW kannst du zum Glück nicht so viel falsch machen.

Das Wiki hilft dir hier
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Map_Features
mit vielen Dingen weiter. Und wenn es Fragen gibt, immer raus damit.

Grüße
silversurfer83

PS: POIs nur auf die Gebäudeumrisslinie legen, wenn an genau der Stelle auch der Eingang ist. Sonst ungefähr da ins Gebäude, wo sich der Mittelpunkt befindet (ich meine das hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1525402529)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144019005
Kaiolino (2023-11-15 21:13:21+00:00): Hey, den POI habe ich eigentlich gar nicht bearbeitet - ich glaube auch nicht dass der noch hier ist... Ich fuchs mich da vllt. am Wochenende mal näher rein.:)
silversurfer83 (2023-11-15 22:51:47+00:00): 😄

Der node lag schon vorher sehr nah am Gebäudeumriss. So wie ich die Änderung sehe hast du ihn vermutlich kurz angefasst und dann snapt der Editor ihn direkt an die nächstgelegene Linie. Merkst du gar nicht, dass das passiert. Ist so eine Eigenheit von iD (so heißt der Editor im Browser).

Mach dir keinen Stress
ctrl-alt-k (2023-11-14 20:33:00+00:00): Bună, cred că e ok la old_name dacă scria asta înainte, și îmi place cum ai despărțit „clădirea” în mai multe bucăți.
Fischkopp0815 (2023-11-15 12:52:41+00:00): Gab es da kürzlich eine Änderung zum permanenten Tempo 30? Bei Mapillary gibt es ein ziemlich aktuelles Bild vom 27.8.2023, das Tempo 30 nur für Mo-Fr 7-16 Uhr anordnet und das war so eingetragen.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.151050149711&lng=9.0869923476479&z=17&pKey=6425587127519743&focus=photo
Rufus_ID (2023-11-15 14:37:36+00:00): Von der anderen Seite kommend, wurde von dem Schild der Schriftzug "Schule" und "Mo-Fr" entfernt. Fahre dort mindestens ein mal die Woche entlang (aber nur von der B 5 kommend). Werde mir aber auch nochmal das andere Schild, das von den Schienen aus, anschauen und mich nochmal melden.
Fischkopp0815 (2023-12-20 10:58:22+00:00): Hast du inzwischen neue Erkenntnisse bezüglich der Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkung?
Fischkopp0815 (2024-02-29 09:22:18+00:00): Ich war am 28.2.2024 vor Ort. Die temporäre Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkung ist noch gültig.
Richtung B5 mit Angabe der Wochentage
https://up.picr.de/47167706wd.jpg
Richtung Bahn ohne Angabe der Wochentage
https://up.picr.de/47167707qy.jpg
Ich habe es entsprechend geändert
kagebar (2024-02-28 11:34:56+00:00): Вітаю! Не можна вписувати у тег name, який відповідає за власні назви, опис обєків. І загалом це не потрібно, бо назва яку ви вписали дублює теги які використовуються для позначення
Leyla43 (2023-11-15 14:00:08+00:00): Vielen lieben dank @PantherStrix!
aceman444 (2024-01-07 00:22:32+00:00): Je to Tsunami ale aj nazov haly? Pouzivatel je jedna vec, ale hala sa moze nazyvat inak.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-14 18:00:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Fantazyjna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349268498
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349268499
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349268500
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349268501
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349268502

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
jslawin2 (2023-11-15 05:43:02+00:00): Poprawione
woodpeck (2023-11-14 18:58:36+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM. You may want to check the address you entered for "Tipsy's", you are currently stating the street is "Dundee-Huntley Rd" but no such street exists nearby?
MKlopp (2023-11-14 19:07:38+00:00): Hi there thank you for the correction, I just put a corrected road name in for the location
Aerond (2024-03-25 12:59:44+00:00): Varför ändrade du toan till disused:amenity? Är den inte tillgänglig?
Birger Canerstam (2024-03-25 20:38:25+00:00): Den var vid tiden för min ändring avstängd.
Aerond (2024-03-25 21:17:21+00:00): Hmm, ok. Undrar om det stämmer än...
Var det skyltat eller? Får undersöka närmare.
Birger Canerstam (2024-03-26 05:25:37+00:00): Ja det var skyltat, avstängd på grund av skadegörelse.
Den hade i sin tur suttit uppe sedan Augusti 2023.

Men undersök det närmare du, saker kan förändras.
Domme9991 (2023-12-11 14:50:03+00:00): Zwar ist die Linie ewig schon außer Betrieb, ich habe aber immer noch die naive Hoffnung, dass sie irgendwann zurückkommt. Wäre es da nicht sinnvoller, die Linie wieder zurück zu holen und auch auf disused zu setzen? Gibt es diesen key überhaupt für Routen? Würde ich bei den anderen, noch vorhanden Quartiersbuslinien dann genauso machen.
chris2map (2023-12-14 07:44:53+00:00): Hallo, für die Haltestellen, bei denen die Schilder ja noch stehen, habe ich "disused" verwendet. Für die Route kenne ich das "disused-tagging" nicht. Möglich wäre es natürlich. Meine Abwägung war, dass wir, sollte es irgendwann soweit sein, lieber eine neue Route mit den dann korrekten Daten, Bezeichnungen und "ref's" anlegen, als alte Daten über einen langen Zeitraum mitzuschleppen. Du kannst aber das gerne auch testen mit dem "disused" auf den Routen. Grüße!
Filip009 (2023-11-14 19:20:56+00:00): Zabudol si na popis sady zmien.
macdale (2023-11-14 22:32:53+00:00): Ospravedlnujem sa. Vacsiu sadu som pomenoval. Posledne 4 male zmeny, ktore sa tykali myslim len v zmene nazvov som zabudol pomenovat. Ty si inak zodpovedny, resp. kontrolujes, co tam ja pridam?
Filip009 (2023-11-15 08:32:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/about
Za mapy je zodpovedná komunita. Čiže napríklad aj ty. Každý chce vytvoriť čo najlepšie mapy, takže keď niekto robí chyby, tak ten, čo má viac skúseností sa ho snaží na to upozorniť. Ty vieš taktiež hocikomu napísať, že sa ti nezdá jeho úprava. :)
macdale (2023-11-15 12:14:26+00:00): Ok jasne, rozumiem. Ja len kvoli nedostatku casu som nemal cas prestudovat si ako to cele vlastne funguje a celkom ma prekvapilo, ze clovek sem moze pridat takmer hocico a tie zmeny sa hned publikuju. Ako som ti spominal, mapy tvorim niekolko rokov, no zatial len v offline priestore. Teraz, ked som zistil, ze to ide aj takto, prensam veci z nich sem. Za tym su mesiace prace badania, overovania ako aj terenneho vyskumu. Ked vsak zistis (pripadne ktokolvek iny), ze som spravil niekde chybu, pripadne to budes vidiet inak, kludne ma upozorni. Dakujem. PS Mojou hlavnou oblastou zaujmu je Banska Stiavnica a okolie, ktore nadvovazok popularity, nie je zatial az tak dobre zmapovane. Ja som inak Miso, ahoj.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-11-17 01:28:54+00:00): não existe "Parque" dentro da escola. Park não é parquinho de escola.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-11-17 01:29:22+00:00): voce duplicou varias coisas, inclusive a via de pedestre.
Mashin (2023-11-17 13:33:03+00:00): Hi Jack, I feel like these might not be really a park. Park is more like when there are trees, paths to walk on, maybe benches to sit and relax. These areas look to me as more oriented towards sport use.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Drecreation_ground
jnighan (2023-11-17 14:00:11+00:00): Yeah, I think you're right. I hate how ambiguous leisure=park and landuse=recreation_ground are, and I think landuse=recreation_ground was overused in the MAGIC import. I'll use it for areas predominantly occupied by sports fields and playgrounds, though.
user_5359 (2023-11-17 08:37:30+00:00): Hello (again)! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1223545469. what is the mean of the tags
typzast_k = 210
typzast_p = škola
?
they (2023-12-23 01:46:39+00:00): I have to question the validity of this change.  A few reasons:
- AADTs between Window Rock and the NM State Line are significantly higher than anywhere west of Window Rock.
- ADOT considers this highway a minor arterial, not a principal arterial.
- What regional centers does this route connect?
- Having done a cursory search through mailing lists, OSMUS Slack, and the wiki, it appears that no consultation was done with the community regarding this chahge.
Joseph R P (2023-12-30 21:16:39+00:00): AZ 264 is the most direct connections between the population centers of Gallup and Page plus further areas like St. George and Albuquerque. Functional Classification maps aren't very relevant to how roads should be classified on OSM because they vary by state which often leads to over/under-classifying roads. Same can kind of go for AADT stats, which can be more useful in urban areas to decide which arterial are the most important to drivers, but out in the middle of nowhere, roads will always have traffic counts significantly lower than those of sections that serve to adjacent towns such Window Rock and Gallup, which is as busy as it is because travel between two closer towns is significantly higher than travel between two distant ones.

As for consensus, I didn't start a discussion for reclassifying this highway because I figured I didn't need to start one. It's only extending an existing trunk route to connect with others, so I considered that the intention of it should've been clear. I've never really understood why time should be spent on starting a discussion thread on a subject relatively minor to something like undoing edits that were the result of a prior discussion or mass edits like reclassifying a bunch of roads or imports. It seems easier to me to just make an edit and quickly revert it if it  were to be unanimously objected or contradicts specific statewide guideline regarding it or simply discuss it on the changeset if only one person objects.
they (2024-01-02 03:13:22+00:00): The New Mexico classification page defined Window Rock as a regional center, because of the large volume of traffic between it and Gallup, and its status as the capital of the Navajo Nation.  In hindsight, that might not have been the best decision.  Since the two cities are so close, Window Rock might as well be a suburb of Gallup.

Regarding the rest of that route, I would first question that Page is an important enough regional center to have `place=city` status and a node on the trunk network.  It is not defined as a micropolitan statistical area by the US Census, and I'd guess that people from places like Kayenta, Tuba City, and Kanab aren't driving to Page for much because they aren't much farther from a bigger city.  It is hard to tell without knowing the area better.  Do you have ties to Northern Arizona or Southern Utah?  Otherwise, I think the only way you could justify this is digging into American Community Survey data from the Census to make a case that this is a regional center, if the data are available in that level of granularity.  Without that kind of justification, making Page a city seems like tagging for the renderer.

Second, there are many small cities throughout the West that are considered regional centers on the Trunk network but don't have direct connections tagged as `highway=trunk`.  While in nearly all cases once could identify some road connecting any two cities, at some point it just isn't reasonable.  Long distances or mountainous terrain can reduce the importance of the link between two cities.  If we don't make a judgement call at some point, we'll have lots of minor highways that aren't in great shape nor very well traveled tagged as trunk, and the tag will lose meaning.  In my opinion, small cities, such as centers of Micropolitan Statistical Areas, need connectivity to the the Interstate Highway System, a major metro area, and possibly a direct path to a major port.  Gallup, Page, and St. George already have all three, so I have to question the how important the link between Gallup and St. George really is for those cities.

Finally, for the reasons stated above, there may be dead-ends or spurs in the trunk network for good reasons.  So please, do not tag something as trunk just to "extend an existing trunk route."
Joseph R P (2024-01-02 06:45:04+00:00): I tagged Page as a city for the reasons that it is the largest city in northern Arizona away from the I 40 corridor (aside from Tuba City, which isn't really a city) and that it also serves as a major hub for all of the national parks/forests and other nature reserves and recreation areas in the region, as well as a major highway junction in general.

I'm well aware that trunk routes can just "dead end", like CO 82 to Aspen or US 1 to Key West, considering they have nowhere else to go, but in many cases the dead-end trunk routes simply exist just because they are expressways, like the ones around Tucson. NM 264 didn't exactly connect to the Arizona border so I assumed it was just a leftover of trunk = expressway tagging but that as I went over wasn't the sole reason I extended it. I also do recognize that not every place tagged as place=city can or should be connected to each other by trunk routes directly, like Carson City and Ely or Winnemucca and Klamath Falls because the roads linking them have even far less traffic or population along them than the ones criss-crossing the Navajo Nation. Places like Tuba City and Window Rock aren't exactly trunk route connection points on their own, let alone worthy of place=city, but they do add to the importance of the route between them, because they're relatively significant in their respective regions and serve as major junctions and commercial centers for the local areas.
woodpeck (2023-11-14 18:56:23+00:00): Hello there and welcome to OSM. Are there two stationery stores right next to each other, or is this one store that you accidentally added twice? Maybe one of them needs to be deleted again? -- When setting the name, never use a descriptive tag. A stationery store will not usually be called "Stationery Store", it will be called something like "Anna's Paper Things" or maybe "Office 3000" or something like that. Unless of course "Stationery Store" is what it says on the sign outside.
habi (2023-11-20 10:05:37+00:00): Ciao MappSurfer

Ich kann verstehen, dass historische Bahnstrecken interessant sind.
Der generelle Konsens ist aber, dass in OpenStreetMap nur Dinge gehören, die sogenannt 'on the ground' verifizierbar sind.
Wenn eine alte Eisenbahnstrecke *nicht* mehr sichtbar ist, gehört diese *nicht* in OpenStreetMap, sonder evtl. in https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/
Das OSM Wiki erwähnt bei `railway=razed` "Avoid mapping former railways if it is impossible to determine the former route from the ground or aerial imagery."

Was ist dein Ziel mit der Erfassung dieser (und anderer) alten Bahnstrecken?

E Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi

PS: Ich bin über deine Änderungen gestolpert, weil https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1225285730 einen 'Qualitäts-Überprüfungs-Fehler" produziert hat, die ich bin Bern "überwache". Da tauchte dein Username auf, und ich hab' angeschaut, was du sonst so gemacht hast.
habi (2023-11-25 17:50:41+00:00): Wir haben das mit den `railway=razed` mal wieder im Schweizer IRC-Kanal [1] diskutiert.
Selbst der Maintainer von http://openrailwaymap.org "hat klar gesagt, razed macht nur Sinn, wenn noch das Bankett oder der Wall (wurde erhöht damit die Bahnlinie gerade ist) oder der Einschnitt noch im gelände sichtbar sind."
Dies an der https://stateofthemap.eu, deren Videos noch nicht online sind.

Ist dein Ziel, dass historische Bahnlinien auf http://openrailwaymap.org auftauchen?

[1]: https://osm.ch/hilfe.html, du bist herzlich eingeladen, dort mitzudiskutieren.
habi (2024-12-10 11:20:02+00:00): Ciao MappSurfer

Beim Anschauen von ungewöhnlichen building-Werten in der Schweiz ist mir https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1223550799 mit `building=Wagon` aufgefallen.
Nach etwas Suchen aufm OSM Wiki habe ich das Ding zu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Drailway_car umgetaggt.

Gruss,
habi
habi (2025-03-27 13:06:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1223550914 ist auch ein way ohne jegliche Tags.
Evtl. kannst du dem mal nachgehen...
Filip009 (2023-11-14 19:03:16+00:00): Používajte prosím výstižnejšie popisy sád zmien https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn

Hello, please use more appropriate changeset comments https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
burrscurr (2024-09-18 20:13:33+00:00): Danke für den Edit, das wollte ich auch schon immer machen, hab mich aber nie getraut :D
orthocircular (2023-11-14 21:12:43+00:00): Thanks so much for your contributions in Salem! Together we're making the local map so awesome!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144022387
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-11-17 01:28:15+00:00): voce adicionou varios pontos que já existiam e ainda deixou sem nome.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-14 19:10:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Fantazyjna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349401306
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349401307
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349401308
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349401309
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349401310
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349401311

"Ukryta":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349401312
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349401313
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349401314
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349401315

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
jslawin2 (2023-11-15 05:41:58+00:00): Poprawione
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-14 19:10:34+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Fantazyjna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349413774
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349413775
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349413776
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349413777
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349413778
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349413779
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349413780
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349413781

"Ukryta":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349413787
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11349413788

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
jslawin2 (2023-11-15 05:40:59+00:00): Poprawione
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-11-17 01:27:40+00:00): favor,  não deixar tudo em maiusculo
they (2023-12-23 01:21:53+00:00): Hi Joseph,

Can you point to any correspondence with the community or updating tagging guidance regarding this classification change to trunk?  Last I checked, New Mexico agreed on this trunk network: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/New_Mexico/Highway_Classification#Route_Roster, which does not include this stretch of NM 90.  If you want to make a change to the trunk network, could you please leave a note in that wiki page's discussion board as well as the pertinent mailing lists and Slack channels before making the change, and then after getting a consensus or no feedback after a few days, document the change in that route roster?  A lot of thought was put into that list to prevent all the major highways from getting retagged every couple of years.

Thank you.
Joseph R P (2023-12-30 21:30:09+00:00): The NM class. page appears to still only be in the draft/proposal stage according to the banner at the top, and I don't assume those have yet been completed or are set in stone so I take them with a grain of salt. If this is outdated then I can remove that tag and put in the reasoning for making NM 90 trunk (which is to link Silver City to Tucson and places in that general direction).