piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisReview (2025-03-05 07:52:35+00:00): Partly reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163221704
IIVQ (2026-01-15 15:49:55+00:00): Haha, j'ai essayé ce centier aussi. Vraiment impossible de passer! J'espère que un local nettoye le sentier!
Jean-Louis Stanus (2026-01-15 17:52:36+00:00): Le long de la vieille sabre ?
Malheureusement oui.. Devenu impraticable.
Est il sur sentier.be?
IIVQ (2026-01-15 18:24:30+00:00): Je ne sais pas, ca site ne fonctionne pas avec moi...
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-18 14:17:01+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12636170261/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
anirudh-ramesh (2025-04-21 04:17:30+00:00): It's a manhole having some communication equipment like optical fibre cables. It's probably operated by Tata Communications Limited (TCL).
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-15 22:02:49+00:00): So man_made=manhole ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmanhole ) ?

+ manhole=telecom ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:manhole ) ?
StC (2025-03-09 14:14:28+00:00): Bonjour,

GR est une marque déposée, merci de ne pas l'ajouter dans OSM.
Glassman (2025-03-05 16:59:18+00:00): I removed some of what you did. The secondary highway is likely a service road. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. You may want to read the wiki on how to map features.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163208815
TinPetreković (2025-03-04 16:33:41+00:00): Reverted because of an unexpected errors #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163209422
map per (2025-03-07 10:38:01+00:00): Because of review_requested:
The edit looks good, thank you!
Nakaner (2025-03-05 12:49:35+00:00): Hallo,

das stimmt so nicht ganz.

Anlage 2 zu § 41 Absatz 1 StVO lfd. Nr. 23 sagt: "Anderer Fahrzeugverkehr als Radverkehr sowie Elektrokleinstfahrzeuge im Sinne der eKFV darf Fahrradstraßen nicht benutzen, es sei denn, dies ist durch Zusatzzeichen erlaubt."

Dein Tagging vebietet das Reiten. Das untersagt die StVO nicht. Oder ist dort auch noch ein Reitverbot angeordnet? Fahrzeugverkehr entspricht in OSM dem vehicle=*-Tag. Alle Zufahrtsbeschränkungen folgen in OSM einer Verkehrsklassen-Hiearchie, die du im Wiki nachlesen kannst. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

Im Übrigen gibt es für Fahrradstraßen noch bicycle_road=yes, das du auch noch ergänzen könntest.

Richtig wäre daher: vehicle=no + bicycle=designated + bicycle_road=yes

Möchtest du das bitte korrigieren?

Viele Grüße

Michael
Wicht (2025-03-05 16:04:52+00:00): Hallo Michael,

vielen Dank für die Hinweise und die Hilfe!
Nachdem es die Fahrradstraße nun seit über einem Jahr gibt und mich OsmAnd immernoch da durch navigiert, wollte ich das mal "so langsam" berichtigen.
Ich hoffe, dass ich alles richtig gemacht habe.

Viele Grüße
Stefan
stillhart (2025-03-04 17:01:24+00:00): 🙏
TheNightRider (2025-03-05 08:57:06+00:00): I noticed you added capacity:disabled=1 but left the wheelchair:description=1 stall
Should the wheelchair:description=1 stall be removed?
Baloo Uriza (2025-03-05 12:52:33+00:00): Yes, that's correct, I intended to remove that wheelchair description.
TheNightRider (2025-03-05 22:01:17+00:00): Thanks, and thanks for removing it!

BTW, OSM tagging is getting a bit complex, but I like reading the docs. Would you say the OSM documentation is up to date? Does it generally keep up to date or go in spurts where it gets out of date then gets updated?
Baloo Uriza (2025-03-06 00:36:21+00:00): Kinda sorta.  Helps to look around the wiki and the map a bit to figure out what's going on.  The lanes page is outright wrong and some people puppyguarding the wiki keep trying to insist bike lanes and permanently closed lanes aren't "lanes", so you have to take what you're reading with a grain of salt and apply common sense in such cases.
TheNightRider (2025-03-06 03:39:57+00:00): Heh heh, well, anything done by humans is imperfect, but we try.
TheNightRider (2025-03-06 03:49:05+00:00): The tagging scheme you recommended (amenity=construction + construction=charging_station) worked while another editor's suggestion didn't (construction:amenity=charging_station). So, thanks again! 

I've made the change to all stations I've mapped, and I'm pleased to see that the default OSM renderer puts the addr:housenumber on the map for a charging station under construction instead of just hiding it or not showing any difference between live and under construction.
TheNightRider (2025-03-06 03:50:15+00:00): Now just have to wait for those tiles to get re-rendered. :)
MxxCon (2025-03-05 01:18:38+00:00): Hello.
Please note this is not a properly formatted phone number tag. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage how to correctly format it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163209689
TheNightRider (2025-03-05 08:09:38+00:00): This amenity is not under construction ( start_date: 2023-10-27). Maybe the comment was meant for another changeset?
MxxCon (2025-03-05 01:16:13+00:00): Hello.
Please note this is not a properly formatted phone number tag. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage how to correctly format it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163209753
MxxCon (2025-03-05 00:46:54+00:00): Hello.
Please note this is not a properly formatted phone number tag. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage how to correctly format it.

Also please do NOT abbreviate feature names. They should be fully spelled out. Is "St" short for Saint or Street? Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163210178
OrthodoxChurchMap (2025-03-05 01:20:03+00:00): Got it, thanks for the information. I didn't know either of those things so I have made those mistakes many times, but I'll get them all fixed.
MxxCon (2025-03-05 01:40:04+00:00): Yes, please look over your edit history and correct such mistakes. I flagged a few more changesets, but didn't look at all of them.
OrthodoxChurchMap (2025-03-05 02:18:29+00:00): I'm pretty sure I got all of them. Thanks again for letting me know of these formatting rules before I made even more mistakes.
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-03-04 21:01:36+00:00): Moin highpotential,

stimmt leider nicht ganz, weil das Gebäude auch Wohngebäude ist.

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
highpotential (2025-03-10 18:43:20+00:00): Hallo Roger,
hast vermutlich recht, was wäre denn die richtige Attributierung dafür. Bin zwar schon lange dabei aber wegen Zeitnot eher mit StreetComplete unterwegs
Gruß
highpotential
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-03-11 09:38:15+00:00): Ich habe da auch schon länger darüber nachgedacht und auch im Forum und im Telegram Chat darüber diskutiert. Die Meinungen gehen da auseinander. Entweder einfach nur als building=yes belassen, sich für eine Variante entscheiden oder mehrere Werte mit Semikolon getrennt angeben. Hier also z.B. building=retail;residential.

Ich tendiere inzwischen zu letzterem.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-29 18:18:54+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173943118
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-07 21:27:37+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163344283
MxxCon (2025-03-05 00:43:52+00:00): Hello.
Please note this is not a properly formatted phone number tag. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage how to correctly format it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163210540
mueschel (2025-03-11 19:03:00+00:00): Hi,
I see that you introduce a large set of new tags to describe monuments. 
In general this seems to be a good idea with a reasonable tagging scheme.
Nevertheless I think it would be good to have this scheme fully documented and discussed in the community before there are too many objects added.
BholeKiBhasam (2026-05-25 15:10:12+00:00): g'day, i was sent to this location by a wallpaper that used the image of this woodland as wallpaper and the co-ordinates made me reach to your track mapping...:) tried and corrected it....
rsavoye (2026-05-25 15:22:59+00:00): That's a very unusual way to find an area to do some mapping in! My last changeset just reverted my drag mistake, but otherwise the geometries were the same as what was already there. All I was doing was adding name and/or ref where they were lacking. It's good to see somebody doing a little cleanup, always appreciated!
NeisBot (2025-03-04 17:12:37+00:00): Hi Karpinewqewq32, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 97% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163211078
NeisReview (2025-03-05 12:03:55+00:00): 👎 Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163221658
MxxCon (2025-03-05 00:39:40+00:00): Hello.
Please note this is not a properly formatted phone number tag. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage how to correctly format it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163211372
pfg21 (2025-04-22 06:56:35+00:00): на какоим осчновании дорога 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/140519886
поднята до уровня tertiary ??
Zorororo (2025-03-05 18:39:46+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Bing Streetside
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 17:50:34+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4008256452/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of shop is here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting?
0000FF berries (2025-04-01 19:03:02+00:00): Hi Mateusz :) Thank for reminding me about this POI :) This type of shop sells things related to baptism (and sometimes wedding) ceremonies. They sell specialised invitations, favors for invited people, candles, decorations, clothes, etc. Those shops that have (baptism, wedding) clothes as their focus are easy to map, but this one (and some others I know), can't be tagged as clothes shops with sub-tags. I might use shop=baptism :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-01 23:56:07+00:00): maybe 

shop=religious religious=baptism religion=christian

?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-01 23:56:32+00:00): wait, shop=religion

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dreligion
0000FF berries (2025-04-02 23:23:19+00:00): Thanks for the suggestion Mateusz, it's a good one! This could be definitely used for the baptism shops, it just needs a suitable sub-tag to distinguish it from the general religious shops, selling icons, candles etc. Thanks :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-03 17:18:45+00:00): shop_subtype=baptism ?
JJIglesias (2025-03-04 18:01:34+00:00): Hola y Saludos
Excelente q habites en esa zona, hay cantidad de ediciones q se necesitan en esa zona y que requieren conocimiento local. Si tienes Celular te recomendamos que uses la aplicacion OrganicMaps y/o OSMAND para navegar y tambien puedes editar algunas partes del mapa desde esas apps.

Hay una aplicacion extra q sirve para agregar caracteristicas a data ya existente y es de gran ayuda, se llama StreetComplete.

Muchas gracias por contribuir al mapa.
kuhni74 (2025-03-04 19:50:11+00:00): vielen Dank!
rab (2026-01-21 21:42:47+00:00): fantasy roads?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1364546941
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1364321032
s777n (2025-03-09 18:53:25+00:00): Здравствуйте. Типы объекта проставляется не именем на здание а тегами. Например трансформаторная подстанция (нужно чуть чуть пролистать вниз) - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:power%3Dsubstation#Примеры
Jakka (2025-03-04 19:51:06+00:00): Pourquoi vous avez enlever toutes ces rues ?
Jakka (2025-03-04 19:53:35+00:00): https://geoportail.wallonie.be/walonmap#SHARE=2F8A88970359ED0FE0630AB6A49DF6B2
Laurentignol (2025-03-05 06:29:57+00:00): Je les avais ajoutées mais mes modifications apparaissaient sur un certain niveau de zoom et pas sur les autres.
Jakka (2025-03-05 08:05:14+00:00): Correcte, chaque zoom niveau est calculer a différente moments selons les server, afin de ne pas surcharger les serveurs. 
Quand vous avez fait un édit.
Sur carte général il faut une fois renouveler écran ctrl+F5 pour récupérer les données mises à jour, sinon vous êtes toujours en train de regarder dans la mémoire cache de votre PC ;)
SiennaShade (2025-03-04 22:48:25+00:00): Not sure why you left the crossing=controlled tag instead of changing it to crossing=traffic_signals. crossing=controlled is not documented on the OSM wiki, has just 924 uses worldwide on taginfo, and seems to mean the exact same thing as crossing=traffic_signals, so I think it should not be used and maybe eventually eliminated.
gurglypipe (2025-03-04 22:16:37+00:00): Have you surveyed this?
gurglypipe (2025-03-05 17:33:30+00:00): I don’t think you did. The speed limit and access around South Lodge and The Greaves were wrong. I surveyed them today and made https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163253770

Armchair mapping is fine for adding certain details on the map, but speed limits are not one of them. Please provide sources for your edits and stop armchair adding speed limits.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-04 18:10:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12636397817
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/153965681

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pebepebe (2025-03-04 19:27:55+00:00): Nie wiem jak to jest naprawdę, na stronie gis https://gis.kielce.eu/?permalink=81001944# ani budynek szkoły ani hurtowni nie mają adresów, natomiast po wyszukaniu w google obie firmy (Szkoła Podstawowa nr 8 i hurtowania Canalis) podają adres Hauke-Bosaka 1.
NeisReview (2025-03-05 07:12:11+00:00): #NoTags

Hi, welcome to OSM.

I've reviewed your latest map edits and it seems that this changeset you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
NeisRevert (2025-03-14 07:18:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163598217 where the changeset comment is: 
No response
eggie (2025-03-04 19:17:44+00:00): Dag Apeldoorner.

Een barrier is meestal verbonden met de een pad of weg. Dat is hier niet zo. Effect zal het zo niet hebben.
Staat er ook een paaltje. Het zijn nu twee barrier achter elkaar.

MVG
eggie
Apeldoorner (2025-03-04 20:44:37+00:00): Hallo eggie, aan de westzijde van de vlijtseweg heeft het pad een rood witte paal. Aan de oost zijde van de weg (het pad richting het kanaal) liggen drie betonblokken van 60x60 cm die de doorgang versperren. Ik heb eventueel een foto van de situatie.
eggie (2025-03-04 20:52:03+00:00): Oke... wat ik bedoelde is dat een barrier vast hoort te zitten aan het pad. Het ligt nu los.
Een paaltje kun je taggen met barrier=bollard. Die node hoort dan ook vast te zitten aan het pad.
Mapse..
eggie
eggie (2025-03-05 08:02:12+00:00): Dag Apeldoorner, 
Aan de oostzijde stond twee paatjes op de kaart die ook niet vastzaten aan het pad. De barrier=block heb ik vastgemaakt een het pad en aan de westzijde heb ik een paaltje toegevoegd aan het Pletterijpad. 
Nu klopt het denk ik zoals jij schetst. 

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2025-03-04 18:24:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
Langlaeufer (2025-03-05 08:23:59+00:00): Hallo heibehr: Steht hier eine neue Beschilderung? Was steht genau auf dem Schild? Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163214087
Langlaeufer (2025-03-05 08:27:03+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=5494269453988700&focus=photo&lat=52.463818401901&lng=9.4650805663761&z=17&x=0.2598171044463792&y=0.4731357519867393&zoom=2.682539682539683
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163214087
Pt873 (2025-03-04 18:46:37+00:00): Oi! Esse acesso à Rua das Pipiras não existe mais.
BakoyeRiver (2025-03-06 08:08:56+00:00): Hello Pt873, thank you for bringing this to my attention. I have made the update as per your suggestion. Have a great day!
Vinber-Pro (2025-04-26 16:52:34+00:00): Bonjour,
je pense que le collège se trouve avec le lycée au dessus et non pas comme emprise des écoles maternelle et élémentaire du Lou Pin Bert

https://www.valdeleyre.fr/equipement/?cartographie=&s=&thematiques-equipements=&communes_82=82&communes=82
Lisapple (2025-04-29 14:39:53+00:00): Exact Vinber,
les données actuelles de l'Éducation Nationale donne le "Collège Le Barp" (et non "Collège du Barp") Rue des Bouvreuils et non Chemin de Mougnet comme précédemment placé, tout comme l'INSEE depuis le SIRET.
Il y a de fortes chances que la commune a certifié récemment ses adresses, ce qui expliquerait la correction de l'erreur.
Luzandro (2025-03-05 08:07:37+00:00): Hallo,

Kreisverkehre haben üblicherweise keinen Straßennamen bzw. wenn dann nur einen gemeinsamen für den gesamten Kreisverkehr, aber es haben nicht einzelne Abschnitte den Namen der angrenzenden Straßen. Ich habe die Namen daher wieder entfernt.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:junction=roundabout
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163214705
Grass-snake (2025-03-10 20:14:01+00:00): Здравствуйте, обращаю внимание, что в OSM обычно не указываются статусная часть для топонимов, если их тип можно указать в других тегах. В данном случае для ЖК обычно применяется сочетание residential=apartments + landuse=residential, который обозначает, что это жилой комплекс. В этом случае название лучше указать без статусной части: Юбилейный, Солнечная система и так далее.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F

residential=apartments — уточняющий тег для landuse=residential и используется для указания контура жилого комплекса.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:residential%3Dapartments
rlalbert (2025-03-18 10:37:07+00:00): Благодарю за уточнение. Вы правы, внёс соответствующие исправления.
borishag (2025-03-06 08:05:40+00:00): In de openinstijden tag staat al vermeld dat deze winkel pas op 24 april open gaat. Door het weghalen van de naam tag (constuction) is de winkel niet meer als ICI PARS XL Hilversum te vinden. Technisch is lijkt het me ook niet juist want het pand blijft hetzelfde, er wordt alleen verhuisd. Graag hoor ik je motivatie.
JeroenHoek (2025-03-06 08:22:23+00:00): Verwacht je nu een reactie van mij terwijl je zelf niet reageert op changesetcomments?

Hier is een overzicht van al jouw changesets waarop iemand gereageerd heeft, maar waar jij het verder niet nodig vond om te reageren:

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3008127&noanswer

Misschien dat eerst even oplossen?

Als een winkel pas over een maand open gaat hoort deze nog niet als shop op de kaart. Met construction:shop kun je al wel vast de tags klaarzetten. Als construction je stoort kun je ook disused:shop gebruiken.
eggie (2025-03-04 19:22:07+00:00): Dag 3Develop.. leisure=park hoort op een vlak (is transparant) en niet op een node.
Je kunt het dan gewoon als een deken over het gebied leggen.

MVG
eggie
3Develop (2025-03-04 20:00:46+00:00): Je bedeolt de naam "Getijdenpark Keilehaven"? Die heb ik nu toegevoegd aan het zandvlak. Eigenlijk horen het gras en de bestrating ook bij het park maar het zand is wel het centrale deel. Met vriendelijke groet, Frans, alias 3Develop
eggie (2025-03-04 20:09:34+00:00): Een leisure park kun je overal overheen leggen.
Het is een transparant.
Gr eggie
ivanbranco (2025-03-29 17:06:04+00:00): This edit was reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164257571
user_5359 (2025-03-06 17:41:20+00:00): Hello! What is the mean of the tags gtfs:stop_id:BreizhGo;TIBUS = TIBUS:CNI1A2
gtfs:stop_name:BreizhGo;TIBUS = Montohan
Did you mean 
gtfs:stop_id:BreizhGo:TIBUS = TIBUS:CNI1A2
gtfs:stop_name:BreizhGo:TIBUS = Montohan
(colon instead of semicolon) ?
mga_geo (2025-03-06 18:23:34+00:00): "BreizhGo;TIBUS" est la valeur de l'attribut "network".
Je suffixe "gtfs:stop_id" avec cette valeur pour avoir l'identifiant par network.
L'attribut network n'a généralement pas deux valeurs et cela ne pose donc pas de problème. Mais il y a 4 réseaux en Bretagne avec deux valeurs.
Je vais supprimer ";TIBUS", car la valeur "TIBUS" est présente dans la clé.
Merci du signalement.
Marc
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-07 21:30:11+00:00): Why were all the name tags removed?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163215828
User5848 (2025-06-19 08:46:38+00:00): In this change, I noticed that the Ankara node was missing from the map. Since another user had changed the Ankara city node to a fire station, I wanted to revert that change. However, because I did it manually instead of using the osm-revert tool, I couldn’t fully undo the change, and I accidentally deleted some elements, including related relations. Therefore, I would like to apologize to the community.
NeisBot (2025-03-04 19:27:38+00:00): Hi ikearat, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 87% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 10 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163216021
woodpeck (2025-03-04 19:57:36+00:00): The removed path on the NE side of Oyster Creek did look a bit haphazard - https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=163216021 - though a proper reason for its deletion would be welcome.