piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Rodrigo Rega (2025-07-16 19:36:32+00:00): Hola. Gracias por tus ediciones. Te escribo porque hay algo que no me cuadra: Varias vías que has arreglado aparecen como que na sido creadas de nuevo. ¿Las has borrado y vuelto a crear? Si es así, ten en cuenta que borar y recrear no es buena práctica porque se pierde el historial anterior.

Un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168712990
neuhausr (2026-03-10 16:40:07+00:00): Hi, thanks for working so much on land use! I was looking at a QA tool called OSM Inspector and noticed a number of landuse areas that have another type of landuse inside them. The correct way to handle this is to make a multipolygon relation that includes the outer and inner way, but you seem to have created a "seam" from the outside to inside. One example is the natural=wood SW of Franks Rd and Auburn Rd. Would you be able to fix those? You can find some directions on this wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon Thanks and happy mapping!
DrDisaster (2026-03-12 17:45:16+00:00): I can't say I am 100% tracking the issue. Can you link to a specific object or screenshot it?
neuhausr (2026-03-13 00:38:02+00:00): Sure, here's a link to one example in OSM Inspector: https://tinyurl.com/4pzu96fp  If you zoom out, you can see several more in the area. The OSM wiki page should be fairly clear on fixing, but one tip for iD is that if you select both an inner ring and outer ring and merge (+) them, it will automatically create a multipolygon relation.
DrDisaster (2026-03-13 13:52:26+00:00): Got it! Thank you.
Leo Slager (2025-07-15 10:41:10+00:00): Dag jozin,

Mapcomplete is kennelijk niet geschikt voor dit soort wijzigingen.
Kijk hier eens hoeveel fouten dit veroorzaakt:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=3.34671&lat=51.15888&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.79&overlays=long_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way%2Clong_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

En nog erger: door dit soort fouten kan het gebouw niet meer zichtbaar worden gemaakt op de kaart.

Ga je die fouten zelf verbeteren ?
jozin-belgium (2025-07-15 15:44:21+00:00): Ja, ik ga die fouten zelf verbeteren.
Sorain (2025-07-10 02:50:09+00:00): Alo, ce faci? Distrugi harta marcand terenurile drept cladiri
yelisey90 (2026-01-13 17:04:07+00:00): reverted: mass changes using not on-the-ground checking, but some undetermined sources, possibly simply aerial imagery; including incorrect surface tagging (asphalt instead of unpaved or sett), incorrect addresses to buildings etc.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177188514
mcliquid (2025-07-09 20:52:33+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
silversurfer83 (2025-07-10 15:13:48+00:00): Hi Mark,

ich hätte da noch eine Frage zu diesem Weg: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23525396

Du hast "access=agricultural" gesetzt. In über 99% aller Fälle ist das falsch, weshalb ich gerne Frage welches VZ denn hier wirklich den Verkehr regelt um die korrekten Zugangsrechte setzen zu können.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168713757
Znaika (2025-07-10 21:25:35+00:00): sollte foot=yes & bicycle=yes für diese Straße sein
silversurfer83 (2025-07-12 12:44:36+00:00): Hi
Zitat aus DM von Mark:
"1. Einfahrt verboten (roter Kreis, kein Symbol innerhalb) 2. Rechteckiges Schild, schwarzer Text auf weiß. Text: Land- und forstwirtsch. Verkehr frei 3. Max. Gewicht 12 t, roter Kreis, Text innen: 12 t 4. Max. Geschwindigkeit 10, roter Kreis, Text innen: 10."

Das macht die Sache ein bisschen komplex, sollte sich jedoch sauber abbilden lassen

Das aktuelle Verkehrszeichen-Tool liefert:
highway=track
vehicle=agricultural
maxspeed=47
maxweight=12
source:maxspeed=sign
source:maxweight=sign
traffic_sign=DE:250,1026-36;262[12];274[47]

Dieses Werkzeug kannst du unter
https://trafficsigns.osm-verkehrswende.org/DE
finden.

Ich empfehle auch eine Lektüre des Wikiartikels zu Zugangsrechten
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

(und falls du aus der Gegend bist eine Mail an die zuständige Gemeinde, ob dort nicht ein "Radfahrer frei" oder das VZ250 durch ein VZ260 ersetzt werden kann. Aktuell dürfen dort nämlich rein rechtlich keine Radler fahren)
silversurfer83 (2025-07-12 12:47:12+00:00): @Znaika

in unserer Datenbank führt nur eine Wanderroute über diese Straße. So lange die zuständige Behöre hier ein VZ250 aufstellt ohne Freigabe für Radler sind wir bei OSM gezwungen den Weg so zu erfassen, wie ich oben beschrieben habe. Viele Gemeinden reagieren aber auf freundliche Mails und tauschen Schilder aus.
foot=yes ist nicht nötig, wenn der Weg wie in meinem Text getaggt wird. Siehe Wiki zu access
Znaika (2025-07-13 11:14:04+00:00): Hallo,
hier ist aber für https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23525396 access=agricultural gesetzt (bedeutet foot=agricultural ?). Es sollte aber wie oben beschrieben ist, entweder  vehicle=agricultural oder access=	agricultural & foot=yes stehen. Richtig?
silversurfer83 (2025-07-13 12:07:48+00:00): @Znaika
Das ist halt falsch. Wie ich oben gesagt habe: access=agricultural (oder forestry) sind in (über) 99% der Fälle falsch gesetzt.

Die genannten VZ beziehen sich ausschließlich auf Fahrzeuge (laut StVo auch auf Fahrräder) weshalb die von mir genannte Kombination an Werten auf dem kompletten Abschnitt, für den die VZ, die Mark genannt hat, gelten. Da ich keine Fotos habe und nicht vor Ort bin und war, kann nur jemand mit Ortskenntnis sagen, von wo bis wo diese VZ gelten.
Wenn wir wissen, von wo bis wo, kann in dem Bereich korrekt getaggt werden, wie dort gefahren werden darf.

Bitte lies dir den Wikiartikel zu access aufmerksam durch (speziell den Hierarchieabschnitt).

(Und am Ende denke ich, dass die Stadt statt VZ250 lieber ein VZ260 setzen sollte, da sie aktuell Radverkehr dort verbietet, selbst wenn das keine Absicht ist)
Leo Slager (2025-07-10 10:46:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2025-07-10 10:50:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2025-07-10 11:00:54+00:00): Hoi FristyFox,

Alle begin is moeilijk en van je fouten leer je het meest.

Den Heuvel heb je gewijzig in highway=path, met als gevolg dat motorvoertuigen niet meer over deze weg kunnen navigeren.
Ik zet het weer terug naar residential.

OSM is van oorsprong sterk Engels geörienteerd:  leisure=park is dan ook een Engels landgoed. Een uitgestrekt gebied met een verscheidenheid aan landuse, waterpartijen etc etc
Voor het NL begrip park is er eigenlijk geen goed alternatief. We geven daar dus alleen de landuse weer.

De tag  =playground kan gewoon samen gebruikt worden met de landuse.

Iedereen maakt fouten en we nemen je dat niet kwalijk.
Een onderwerp opzoeken in de wiki   brengt je vaak op het goede spoor.

Veel succes met verder mappen.
Mvg Leo
A67-A67 (2025-07-11 17:06:35+00:00): Hier gebeuren een aantal vreemde dingen:
- De failliete vervoerder Blue Amigo wordt weer toegevoegd aan de waterbuslijnen. Dit was eerder dit jaar veranderd naar Aqualiner.
- De Driehoeksveer wordt toegevoegd aan de concessie Personenvervoer over water Rotterdam-Drechtsteden.

Als de iD-editor een wijziging voorstelt, dat is dat een suggestie, geen fout. Het is dus belangrijk om te controleren of deze wijziging klopt. In dit geval is dat niet zo.
Ewrt1 (2025-07-10 21:38:21+00:00): Reverted, adding a fixed version soon

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168762176
eerib (2025-07-09 21:41:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully as it has been identified as vandalism.

Please refer to:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

If you would like to have the decision reviewed you can have that done by emailing the Data Working Group.

data@openstreetmap.org

Thank you
eerib (2025-07-09 21:41:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully as it has been identified as vandalism.

Please refer to:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

If you would like to have the decision reviewed you can have that done by emailing the Data Working Group.

data@openstreetmap.org

Thank you
eerib (2025-07-09 21:41:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully as it has been identified as vandalism.

Please refer to:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

If you would like to have the decision reviewed you can have that done by emailing the Data Working Group.

data@openstreetmap.org

Thank you
eerib (2025-07-09 21:41:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully as it has been identified as vandalism.

Please refer to:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

If you would like to have the decision reviewed you can have that done by emailing the Data Working Group.

data@openstreetmap.org

Thank you
NieWnen (2025-07-10 00:07:48+00:00): Dzięki!
Przy okazji jest taki plugin jak undelete, może się przydawać w takich sytuacjach do przywracania konkretnego obiektu :P 

https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Action/Undelete
NeisBot (2025-07-09 21:36:43+00:00): Hi Daniel Lanik, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added company details to a way, including website and office information."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
mueschel (2025-07-12 15:59:28+00:00): Hi,
you added a couple of strange 'rv:..." tags. Could you explain what they mean?
okwithmydecay (2026-04-18 08:47:27+00:00): This appears to have reopened now
MacLondon (2026-04-18 20:33:35+00:00): Thanks. Yeah, has been opened for a while. I've removed the access=no tags now.
Norbert Dichter (2025-07-10 09:53:02+00:00): Merci, Benoit.
Đuro Jiří (2025-07-09 22:17:48+00:00): Ciao McCio,in questo caso è migliore usare disused:shop=electronics, oppure 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dvacant
b-jazz (2025-07-10 17:09:03+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1079079461

The lines that define fairways, greens, bunkers, water hazards, and tees should never intersect (partially overlap) each other and we noticed that they are overlapping in one or more of the feature pairs in this changeset. Objects that are joining each other should *share* nodes on the border, but not cross over each other. Alternatively, you can go around one of the objects and leave a small gap. For instance a fairway polygon that skirts around a bunker. Please read this wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions, please reply here and I'll gladly help clarify things. Thanks!
nmac85 (2025-07-11 00:24:26+00:00): OK will try to avoid this in future.
Alexmol (2025-07-09 22:21:56+00:00): Por engano o título e source estão errados.
São actualizações de antenas, source: Comunidade Cellmapper PT
literan (2026-05-27 08:50:40+00:00): не балуйтесь
Comino (2026-02-12 22:31:52+00:00): Olá,

Vejo que este nó adicionado é apenas uma loja online, sem um local físico (de tijolo e argamassa) que possa ser verificado. O OSM não aceita lojas que são exclusivamente virtuais. Um endereço físico acessível ao público é absolutamente necessário.
Por isso, peço gentilmente que você remova este nó.

Boas contribuições,

Edwin Comino
BTC Maps
@Comino
gurglypipe (2025-07-10 10:25:59+00:00): leisure=outdoor_seating outdoor_seating=yes doesn’t make any sense.

Why make this change?
SomeoneElse (2025-07-10 23:20:01+00:00): It was a cockup on my part - I thought that I was changing the "outdoor_seating" tag on the pub, not the "outdoor_seating" tag on the outdoor seating...
gurglypipe (2025-07-10 23:28:32+00:00): Hah, yes, I can see how that could happen. Thanks for fixing it

(For anyone else who reads this, it was fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168764186)
Hufkratzer (2025-07-10 18:30:19+00:00): Hi,
ich glaube nicht, dass https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413589929 eine Reitanlage im Sinne von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding ist; dafür ist die Fläche zu klein. Vielleicht gehört sie zu einer Reitanlage, vielleicht zu https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100048679016211 ?
Wahrscheinlich hast du dich verleiten lassen, die kl. Fläche als Reitanlage zu taggen weil daneben auch ein Reitplatz (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157523493) und eine (vermutliche) Reithalle (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157522695) fälschlicherweise als Reitanlagen getaggt wurden. Reitplätze werden aber normalerweise mit leisure=pitch getaggt und für Reithallen gibt es https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building=riding_hall .

Jedenfalls sollten mit leisure=horse_riding nicht einzelne Teile, sondern die Reitanlage als Ganzes getaggt werden, vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE_talk:Tag:leisure=horse_riding#reitplatz_vs_reitanlage

Nicht weit weg wurde eine andere Reitanlage gemappt, wo das ungefähr dementsprechend gemacht wurde (vom gleichen User seltsamerweise): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159810045
Nüsschen (2025-07-10 20:11:11+00:00): Na dann, Rolle rückwärts. Ist entfernt.
Hufkratzer (2025-07-10 20:17:01+00:00): Freut mich. Ist das denn da dieser Reit und Zuchtstall Witthaut, wie ich das vermutet habe?
Nüsschen (2025-07-15 15:10:40+00:00): Ich bin dort  nur mit dem MTB vorbei gekommen und habe nicht auf Namen geachtet. Muss ich beim nächsten mal schauen.
Hufkratzer (2025-07-16 18:02:17+00:00): Na klar. Bei OSM ist ja sowieso alles freiwillig.
user_22836626 (2025-08-17 12:13:47+00:00): Der Bahnhof Rheydt-Odenkirchen IST barrierefrei.
mavOsaure (2025-07-10 18:16:52+00:00): Merci de ta contribution!

Il me semble qu'il y a une subtilité avec la rue des Maluettes, mais je n'habite pas dans ce secteur. Est ce que le panneau STOP existe toujours au carrefour avec la rue de Lazenay? Il n'est du coup pas cohérent avec sens unique.
seb1842 (2025-07-10 18:50:43+00:00): Non, c’est un panneau sans interdit maintenant.
Dans le passé, il y a bien eu un panneau stop, mais il a été supprimé.
seb1842 (2025-07-10 18:51:44+00:00): Donc depuis la rue des Maluettes, il est interdit de rejoindre la rue de Lazenay, parce que Carrefour
Udarian (2025-07-09 23:55:43+00:00): for the spots were I was uncertain I left them without any construction tagging and will go back in the near future to determine which parts are under construction; so essentially work still needed.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-10 09:51:45+00:00): Thanks, but make sure that pedestrian access is connected to the rest of the road network, otherwise routing may be broken. I will fix this.
mewhenthe (2025-07-11 05:24:19+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I'd just like to inform you that Esri World Imagery has the most up-to-date data in the Williamson County area as of right now.

You can change the aerial imagery layer by pressing B (or clicking the layered icon on the right side) in the iD editor menu.
NeisReview (2025-07-10 05:07:37+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
citrula (2025-07-10 04:23:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions.

You added both of these as hospitals - there are dedicated tags for both helipads and fire departments. I recommend you complete the built-in tutorial and take a look at the wiki.

Let me know if you need any help making these changes!

Happy mapping
citrula (2025-07-12 03:23:05+00:00): I went ahead and fixed this for you.
tcarlisle (2025-07-13 00:20:17+00:00): According to Mountain Trails this Trail's official name is Tricky Pickle.  Can you please provide evidence that is it named Bob's Bad Mountain Cut Trail.  Thanks.
RupertJames (2025-07-13 02:27:53+00:00): Hi there, there was not a name for the new trail. If it was recently named, then that should be the correct name now.
evilworld (2025-07-10 01:55:10+00:00): I think I made a mistake with Peter Pan’s Flight. There were two buildings on top of each other, and I have deleted the one classified as a building with no name. Now I don't know if that was okay or not.
NeisReview (2025-07-10 05:09:27+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
Udarian (2025-07-10 04:40:50+00:00): I am sorry but in OSM we do not currently support mapping service areas of a business, though If you wanted you could add the location of the business this service area applies and fill in what information you can about it. for more info see the OSM wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsocial_facility .
Udarian (2025-07-10 04:50:55+00:00): also it is important to note that names are not supposed to be used as a description of the feature, for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
Udarian (2025-07-10 04:51:18+00:00): as mentioned above, this commit adds an unsupported feature type to OSM mapped with existing tagging that has different meanings so it has too be reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168722732
Sun2306 (2025-07-10 03:47:56+00:00): Would "shw-muth-quee-um-AW-sum" be better to reflect θ?
eerib (2025-07-10 03:58:06+00:00): I'm not really sure. I just went with what was being distributed via social media and the traditional news media. I could be very wrong with the pronunciation.

https://thetyee.ca/News/2025/06/24/Can-You-Tell-Me-How-Get-Street/

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/trutch-street-renaming-musqueamview-street-1.7562957

https://globalnews.ca/news/11252350/trutch-street-renamed-sx%CA%B7m%C9%99%CE%B8k%CA%B7%C9%99y%CC%93%C9%99mas%C9%99m/
Minh Nguyen (2025-11-15 02:06:04+00:00): name:pronunciation=* should normally be in IPA. I added a name:hur-fonipa=* tag in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174671583 based on the English Wikipedia article. In any case, an explicitly tagged pronunciation should be unnecessary for Halkomelem. It would be more appropriate for the official name, which embeds the Halkomelem name inside an English name.
rarad74 (2025-07-10 09:42:58+00:00): Hi. Please add all necesarry tags . Service road category, speed limit , surface. Not only some lines.
HamiDesert (2025-07-11 18:59:00+00:00): Hi rarad74, thanks for making those updates!
DDD丶Samuel (2025-07-30 03:34:49+00:00): 您好！格尔木河线路所虽纳入格尔木南站管理，但仍属于独立的线路所。不应该删除
MassCartog (2025-07-10 11:42:38+00:00): Hello welcome to osm, please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dflowline
AranzaGH (2025-07-10 04:35:00+00:00): Buenas noches, estaba probando como funciona esta página y al parecer no puedo borrar los cambios una vez subidos jajs, agradecería si alguien logra eliminar mis dos cambios por favor.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-11 23:20:16+00:00): DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173158841
Comino (2025-07-15 07:26:37+00:00): Hi LexFunk,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#legacy-tags
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin
stillhart (2026-03-14 15:41:44+00:00): Warum nicht? Wird überall so genannt. Die URL war auch kürzer. Von Openstreetmap auf eine Map linken ist auch eher sinnlos...
Taya_S (2025-07-10 13:32:42+00:00): Hello Eerib,

You might want to check these two paths. They seem to be overlapping with other paths now.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413399437
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1273242438

Best regards,
Taya Snijder
Glassman (2025-07-10 15:52:56+00:00): #TIP: it is best to follow the roof outline when adding a building then square it by selecting the outline then just type a "q". Since this appears to be one building with two residences, just draw the building and add two nodes, one for each address. I usually place the node near the front door. Let me know if you need help improving this edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168724224
tordans (2025-07-10 06:07:42+00:00): Bitte "shared_lane" nur verwenden, wenn (nur) Sharrows vorhanden sind, also Mischverkehr mit Pictogrammen auf dem Boden. Sonst ist es cw=no
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Sharrows_Toronto_2011.jpg
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168724315
FMC-Henri (2025-07-10 15:02:35+00:00): Ich würde bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/962936970 erwarten, dass das traffic_sign getagged wird, da es ein Bussonderfahrstreifen ist.
Baloo Uriza (2025-07-10 13:31:02+00:00): I'm not quite sure how anything in this changeset is downstream of California but OK.  ;o)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168724407
EuleKC (2025-07-10 21:19:31+00:00): One day, San Andreas and New Madrid will go off at the same time, and this *will* be downstream of California. Go to the Santa Monica pier, put on your roller skates, and coast downhill all the way to St. Louis! :)

When I map a conservation area, I usually have at least a few changesets. For the first one or two, I'll spell out the full name, like Acme Conservation Area, but after that, I just put Acme CA.
Udarian (2025-07-10 16:14:13+00:00): why did you remove boundary=administrative from Broward county.
JoshuaSh (2025-07-10 16:39:30+00:00): That was an accident. It looks like someone else has already fixed it.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-29 20:38:32+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12991231541/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this edit
What kind of shop is here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting?
Till_btn (2025-07-27 06:50:53+00:00): Hi, in verkehrsberuhigten Bereichen braucht man kein maxspeed. Es gilt implizit maxspeed=walk, maxspeed=10 wäre also sogar falsch. Habe das mal wieder entfernt