piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-06 21:27:12+00:00): Sorry that was mybad.  I guess I explained it badly.  This is what I meant:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1526853903
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183522972
HellMap (2026-06-02 16:13:50+00:00): Lūdzu nākotnē veikt šādas individuālu projektu izmaiņas pa vienai. Nevajag uz katra ceļa gabala norādīt `source`, bet iezīmēt no viena avota vienā izmaiņā un norādīt avotu visai izmaiņai, lai to var apspriest individuāli. Vēlāk šos source neviens nenoņems un paliks gadiem pa visiem elementiem. Arī ne visi šeit norādīti avoti var būt pieņemami kartei, ja tie nav ne apstiprināti ne pat pabeigti, bet tikai kaut kādā idejas stadijā. Šādus "projektus" OSM nezīmē. Piemēram ceļi gar Piņķiem izskatās kā aptuveni piemēri demonstrācijai bez nekādiem konkrētiem plāniem un OSM tie diez vai ir jāzīmē.
Sammyhawkrad (2026-06-02 10:40:44+00:00): Hi halfdbeecreativestudio, welcome to OSM. Addresses are separate objects. Please add a new node for new objects. 
I've fixed this, but take note for future edits.
jmarchon (2026-06-02 05:12:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
MappingMore (2026-06-02 12:16:41+00:00):  Revert of  183498248
kingkingHK (2026-06-02 03:24:39+00:00): Please don't add fictitious data to a live public prod database. This is vandalism.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183525516
Wildsharky (2026-06-04 12:04:52+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:183590502
World_Winner (2026-06-03 07:12:50+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 183577213
Wildsharky (2026-06-04 12:01:47+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:183573268
Wildsharky (2026-06-04 12:04:06+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:183579417
Supaplex (2026-06-02 04:15:59+00:00): 可以加old_name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183523903
ZincoYarvis (2026-06-02 08:12:35+00:00): Hey lephan, this changeset has deleted some parking aisles and gardens. Was this intentional?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183523916
lephan (2026-06-02 11:02:24+00:00): yes
ZincoYarvis (2026-06-03 03:52:01+00:00): The parking aisles and gardens are still visible from aerial imagery. What was your reason for deleting them? If you deleted them because they no longer exist, did you survey the area to confirm this?
lephan (2026-06-03 04:38:20+00:00): The image is often out of date when when have construction sites or blocks are sold to developers and have development applications on the site. Either way a site visit is the only way to determine the current status. The alterations reflect the current state of these blocks as of May 2026.
ZincoYarvis (2026-06-03 05:29:37+00:00): Thanks for your response and edits. Please add source=survey to your changesets if they were verified in person.
ZincoYarvis (2026-06-03 05:30:15+00:00): Thanks for your response and edits. Please add source=survey to your changesets if they were verified in person.
rajdhani (2026-06-03 06:41:11+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 183575929
woodpeck (2026-06-02 13:37:01+00:00): The panels at the south end do not line up with the building outline. Are you sure this is manually mapped? If it were a data import then it would have to follow our import guidelines, with prior discussion in the community and clear documentation of sources...
Alvee25 (2026-06-02 22:53:48+00:00): Hey @woodpeck,
The panel strings were plotted based on Esri Imagery, which although is lower resolution than Bing, is more upto date. You may notice the building having being extended onto the parking lot in the domestic terminal in Esri and not on Bing. 
I am assuming Esri does not line up with OSM Map properly, hence the panles not lining up with the south of the building. I can admit it was an oversight on my part to not have confirmed this before committing the changes. 

I will likely get around to fixing this over the coming weekend. Thanks for pointing this out, I can assure you the data was not imported.
Alvee25 (2026-06-03 00:30:02+00:00): After playing with it a bit more, I have realized that zooming past 20 applies an offset to the imagery. 
The fix for this will just need to apply a an offset value to the panels to align them. Will try to get this done soon.
ftrebien (2026-06-02 18:15:37+00:00): Estuks (ex. Fallenz), a CE-469 por Crateús foi rebaixada há poucos dias em contato com a comunidade local. Ela não é mais usada como rota de passagem por Crateús no sentido leste-oeste, a rota de passagem passou a ser pelo novo anel viário.

Por favor, escreva comentários melhores para os seus changesets, um simples ponto não ajuda na revisão.
b-jazz (2026-06-03 16:14:52+00:00): FYI, the golf=hole lines need to point from the tee to the green. I've corrected the ones from this batch of edits but wanted you to know in case you do more courses in the future.
旧加卷 (2026-06-02 04:17:55+00:00): Fujian (Fukien/Fuchien) has historically been a unified province. Tagging it as a historical boundary that was abolished long ago while also using the current de facto boundary is misleading.
ChiroNim (2026-06-02 04:50:07+00:00): From the wiki: "`boundary=historic`: A historic administrative boundary (use judiciously)." This was an administrative boundary of Fukien between 1996–2018 as how `boundary=historic` is used.
旧加卷 (2026-06-02 05:36:29+00:00): Also from the wiki, boundary=historic represents "represent former administrative boundaries that have been abolished long ago"; "consider using a more explicit lifecycle prefix" for "recently abolished boundaries", which are already in use. Also, the wiki page uses the word "instead" when comparing boundary=historic and lifecycle prefix, which suggests that you have to use either one or the other (not both). Only the administrative powers of the provinces were abolished, the de jure existence of provinces remains, so I wouldn't consider it as historic.
muralito (2026-06-02 16:17:42+00:00): Hola DuckyCB. Agregá un nodo nuevo para lo que quieras mapear, pero no modifiques el que tiene ambas direcciones que existen por si misma.
sunjiao (2026-07-08 14:07:25+00:00): Why did you delete so many elements? They really exists.
Higashimado (2026-07-08 15:29:37+00:00): Which elements are you referring to?

If you mean the footways, pedestrian paths, or piers, they were merged or redrawn based on the new imagery rather than being deleted (Specifically, many east–west pedestrian paths were connected across the dam slope, which isn’t ideal because they are not intended for pedestrian access).

I would like to know if you’re referring to something else, or if you have more specific suggestions. I’m sorry that I can’t give a more specific response without additional information.
sunjiao (2026-07-11 11:00:39+00:00): 我说的是汉口江滩的步道。
Higashimado (2026-07-13 13:02:20+00:00): 您好，关于步道的编辑，上条回复已经描述过了。

我仍不知道您具体指的是哪个要素。如果您知道的话且觉不当的话，可以用 revert 工具部分回退，或者重绘。若对此造成不便，我表示抱歉。
woodpeck (2026-06-12 08:00:40+00:00): Many of the trails you added were deleted again in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183998702 - perhaps you and the person doing the deletions could together sort out what is correct.
橘ヒカリ (2026-06-12 23:11:53+00:00): Reverted in 183527154
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:42:38+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185570668
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:42:39+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185570668
rajdhani (2026-06-04 10:47:58+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 183638057
Luzandro (2026-07-30 10:06:24+00:00): Hi,

When adding trails in alpine regions, please include additional details such as sac_scale

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sac_scale

Without additional external information indicating that the trail runs over rocks and glaciers in steep terrain, a data user would not be able to distinguish it from a stroll in the park based solely on its tags

As far as I can tell, the route seems to correspond to the Hofmannsweg

wiki.sn.at/wiki/Hofmannsweg

"Since the early 2000s, the Hofmannsweg has been avoided due to increasing alpine hazards;[1] furthermore, since around 2010, the approach from the Kaiser-Franz-Josefs-Höhe across the melting Pasterze Glacier or the resulting Sandersee has only been manageable with considerable effort and risk and can no longer be recommended"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183529505
literan (2026-06-02 18:47:18+00:00): обычно тротуары вдоль жилых проездов не рисуют, т.к. проезды по сути это и так один большой тротуар согласно ПДД
Herman Lee (2026-06-02 15:32:21+00:00): 请在本地使用本地语言，不要乱用和滥用name，何况本建筑、图书馆存在其清楚的中文名称，这样的编辑行为总会是给数据使用者、osm浏览者、osm的其他编辑者带来困惑。
如果再进一步对于name进行滥用，将会通告data working group此迷惑行为。
Please use the local language when editing locally, and refrain from misusing or abusing in key of tag "name". Given that this building and library have clear Chinese names, such editing practices will invariably cause confusion for data users, OSM viewers and other OSM editors.
Should the misuse continue, this confusing behaviour will be reported to the Data Working Group.
Puffi_fp (2026-06-03 03:52:48+00:00): Hi Herman,
I think your reaction is exaggerated. I'm only able to speak very little Chinese, let alone write it, or type the correct characters (which I don't knowthe pronunciation of) on my phone.
Notwithstanding that myriads of other places in China are named in english or with the latin alphabet, which is not against OSM rules.
Puffi_fp (2026-06-03 03:58:11+00:00): Additionally i urge you again to consider that i map on my mobile phone, and not on a computer (which I don't have with me currently).
And i consider my mappings not to be final, i add missing places. The name can always be corrected later, but better to have the place added in some form than not at all.
Puffi_fp (2026-06-03 04:03:18+00:00): I'm mappingbon a mobile device hence have no access to the name:en tag.
And my intention was to improve map by adding new points, not to replace or remove any local names. The name can still be corrected at a later date by someone who can write the correct Chinese name.
Puffi_fp (2026-06-03 04:03:47+00:00): Chinese or Tibetan i might add
Purumi (2026-06-03 04:05:27+00:00): So, could you use 'name:en' instead of 'name'?
Purumi (2026-06-03 04:09:41+00:00): if you cannot use name:en, well... don't write the name of it. I think 'public library' cannot even be a formal English name of any libraries.
Puffi_fp (2026-06-03 04:23:35+00:00): Yes, when mapping i can only add the name tag.
These were newly mapped objects in areas with very little existing data. Therefore i wanted to add as much information as possible, for travellers who pass through this might be the first town in days/weeks (as it was the case for me).

As i repeatedly said: non-correct english name tags are common in such remote poorly mapped areas, just check many other points in Yushu. Since there isn't much information mapled anyway this only enriches and can be vital information for users of OSM
Herman Lee (2026-06-03 04:38:43+00:00): I also mentioned that, if you do not know the name, please do not add any suspicious characters on tags of "name". Just keep in empty is OK.
mueschel (2026-06-09 10:03:05+00:00): Hi,
was heißt denn 
"sanitary_dump_station:chemical_restrictions = yes"? Das gibt es sonst nirgends.

Reicht das
sanitary_dump_station:chemical_toilet=no
nicht?
urk (2026-06-10 07:59:03+00:00): Aufgrund der Gegebenheiten vor Ort verbietet der Betreiber das Auskippen von Toilettenkassetten mit chemischen Zusätzen. Ich habe keine Statistik, meine aber, dass dies die Mehrheit der Wohnmobilisten betrifft. Wir benutzen keinerlei Zusätze und haben daher kein Problem mit dieser Beschränkung. Leider gibt es wohl keinen spezifischen tag dafür, nur die Unterscheidung zwischen grey_water und chemical_toilet. Wenn ich letzteres auf no gesetzt hätte, würde daraus nicht hervorgehen, dass eine chemielose Kassettenentsorgung möglich ist. Dieses Konstrukt mit "restriction" habe ich irgendwo gelesen, wenn auch n7cht in diesem konkreten Zusammenhang - ich weiß nicht mehr wo.
Hast du einen besseren Vorschlag? 
Hast
mueschel (2026-06-10 08:09:45+00:00): Die gängige Bezeichung (außerhalb von OSM) dürfte black_water sein - warum nicht  
sanitary_dump_station:black_water = yes auch wenn es bisher nicht verwendet wird?

Es gibt 3x sanitary_dump_station:casette, aber da finde ich die Bedeutung nicht eindeutig.
urk (2026-06-10 10:36:17+00:00): black_water wäre zutreffend ... - wenn es nicht eine typische manuelle Kassettenentleerung wäre, also in Hüfthöhe, kein Boden aber Einlauf. In den mir bekannten amerikanischen Womos ist black water immer per Schwerkraft, aber nicht von Grauwasser getrennt. Erst öffnet man das black water valve, später grey water, was durch den black water tank spülen fließt - aber eben alles gravity und nicht so recht passend. 
Es bleibt eine Kassettenentsorgung, aber eben ohne Chemie! 
Was sich noch in der wiki-Seite findet, wäre 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:sanitary_dump_station:accepted&action=edit&redlink=1 
wobei die Bedeutung nicht näher erklärt wird. 
... 
Nun habe ich so viel getextet und bin nach weiterem Durchlesen der wiki-Seite tatsächlich auf "sanitary_dump_station:chemical_restrictions" gestoßen, was wohl vor Tagen die Anregung für mich gewesen sein mochte, diesen key zu verwenden.
mueschel (2026-06-10 10:44:46+00:00): "sanitary_dump_station:chemical_restrictions" hat tatsächlich jemand vor 11 Jahren unkommentiert ins Wiki geschrieben - benutzt hat es seither keiner...

Für das (nicht) entleeren per Schlauch haben wir auch noch
sanitary_dump_station:round_drain (= no)
Und dazu noch sanitary_dump_station:casette=yes

"black_water" ist ja erstmal nur die Art des Abfalls und nicht wie er entsorgt werden kann, deswegen finde ich das schon sehr passend.
urk (2026-06-10 16:18:10+00:00): Dass die von mir "entdeckte" Variante bisher nicht verwendet wurde, wundert mich nicht. Der damit beschriebene Sachverhalt (Toilettenkassette ja, aber ohne chem. Zusätze) ist vergleichsweise selten anzutreffen, oft bei Stellplatz am Bauernhof mit biologischer Abwasserreinigung. Da muss schon ein interessierter Wohnmobilist und ein Mapper zusammentreffen, um sich darüber Gedanken zu machen. 
Aus deinen letzten Zeilen erkenne ich nicht, welcher tag (oder ~-Kombination) du für die beste Variante hältst. Ich würde es so lassen und weiter etablieren, wo zutreffend. Die Verwendung des Begriffs "chemical" beschreibt die Problematik und ist verständlich.
mueschel (2026-06-10 16:38:41+00:00): Ich haette alle drei zusammen verwendet - aber du kannst es auch so lassen wie es jetzt ist.
literan (2026-06-02 18:45:23+00:00): тогда AGenYZ из скобок удаляем, это же не название офиса компании
ieguy3 (2026-06-02 08:25:05+00:00): the boundary between san bernardino and highland is going to be shifted because all land south of 6th street is going to become an industrial park. its part of the Inland Valley Infrastructure Corridor. i think  Inland Valley Development Agency changed the name due to lawsuit but they are plowing homes
Frans S (2026-06-18 10:53:54+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Very accurate in general.
Please take a look to this mapping
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1513918987/history#map=19/15.466897/32.542762
You mapped the small building on the left as a part of the bigger one to the right.
As you can see these are located on 2 different plots. So I should draw them as 2 individual buildings.
Best regards
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-02 10:24:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/688029073

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Albin4d (2026-07-03 08:29:23+00:00): Dziekuje za zwrocenie uwagi - poprawilem juz
Khu Du Lịch Bàu Trắng U&ME (2026-06-03 06:33:28+00:00): Đã không hiểu biết thì bớt làm những công việc cần đòi hỏi trí tuệ, đã ngu thì đừng tỏ ra nguy hiểm. https://maps.app.goo.gl/vRAc5Vspu3A2v2YPA
CAM-Gerlach (2026-06-03 06:58:50+00:00): Indeed, that's great advice for other SEO accounts like yours. And yup, exactly--as the changeset message states, this revert was performed due to likely copying data off Google Maps, as you verified now. Thanks for understanding!
Khu Du Lịch Bàu Trắng U&ME (2026-06-03 07:13:32+00:00): Thứ nhất: Theo Nghị quyết số 202/2025/QH15, sau khi sắp xếp, cả nước có 34 đơn vị hành chính cấp tỉnh (gồm 28 tỉnh và 06 thành phố trực thuộc Trung ương) thì tỉnh Bình Thuận không còn trên bản đồ.
Thứ 2: Đường mà mấy ông ghi là đường ven biển là hoàn toàn sai, nó là đường ĐT716B
Thứ 3: Tôi định vị vị trí của "Công ty" tôi trên bản đồ nhằm mục đích chỉ đường chứ không phải SEO như ông nói.
Thứ 4: Hiện tại chỉ có google maps họ mới cập nhật lại và đúng với Quy định về tên đường địa chỉ của Nhà nước Việt Nam theo Nghị quyết mới.
Thứ 5: Nên tìm hiểu những thay đổi mới,nhất là cập nhật tên đường cho đúng với người sử dụng.
Khu Du Lịch Bàu Trắng U&ME (2026-06-03 12:18:20+00:00): Nói chung bản đồ của các bạn không dùng được, thanks vì đã cho tôi thấy rác từ nó.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-06-03 20:14:18+00:00): Its not "my" map, I'm just a community volunteer like everyone else (and not a local mapper like yourself). Unlike the big Western mapping companies, the data in OpenStreetMap is created and edited by the local community who live in and work in each place, so if you see something that could be improved, like I've said before you are more than welcome to leave a note for local mappers, or even fix it directly yourself (after checking with the local community).
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-05 19:59:21+00:00): Put a bit more generously, you seem to have a fair amount of knowledge about the maps in Viet Nam and how they should be updated, and given the effort you've spent advocating for those changes it's clear that you care a lot about them. It would be great to see you put that time into mapping them, or even just leaving a map note for other users describing the changes you think should be made and why. As OSM is a community map created and edited by volunteers, nothing gets done without someone like you who cares about it stepping up and doing it! If you are interested in mapping further, the [Viet Nam OSM wiki page](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vietnam) is a great place to start.

Happy mapping!
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-02 10:24:47+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/688042058
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/688089753

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Albin4d (2026-07-03 08:31:59+00:00): Poprawione.
HantDX (2026-06-02 09:40:49+00:00): Официальное название деревни на бел. языке Валкі. И ещё вы поставили ссылку на википедию, которая относится не к данной деревне, а к другой деревне Поставского района.
NXN (2026-06-02 16:18:42+00:00): Да, похоже, Вы правы. Должно быть Валкі.
LySioS (2026-06-02 19:30:40+00:00): Bonjour Laury-Anne,
J'ai retouché les infos pour les conformer à la façon de faire sur OSM, et j'ai rajouté des infos manquantes.
Vous pouvez utiliser la fiche de cartes.app qui réutilise les infos d'OpenStreetMap, c'est plus convivial que le site openstreetmap: https://cartes.app/?allez=Compagnie+Les+Mains+Blanches%7Cn13903984250%7C2.98963%7C42.66928

J'en ai profité pour signaler à la commune que l'adresse 10 rue des Tilleuls n'est pas présente dans leur base d'adresses officielles : https://adresse.data.gouv.fr/carte-base-adresse-nationale?id=66186_0775#42.669300_2.990150_18.04

N'hésitez pas à passer en Mairie pour leur signifier

Bonne soirée
joost schouppe (2026-06-04 08:44:00+00:00): Bedankt voor de verrijking! Er is een wat betere tag voor jeugdhuizen, community_centre=youth_centre + community_centre:for=juvenile. Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:community_centre
Ik pas het even aan.
SafwatHalaby (2026-07-03 16:13:30+00:00): שלום יניב, נדמה שמחקת בטעות את סימון רמות מנשה: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996203102
Leo Slager (2026-06-02 21:21:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2026-06-02 21:20:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
bxl-forever (2026-06-02 12:47:34+00:00): Hello.
Please do not trace buildings from aerial images. Second notice.
osm.wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Buildings
You also traced some buildings without attaching them properly to their neighbours, and you apparently failed to see that we use relations to group objects of the same street.
I am currently trying to fix this edit.
Una tantum (2026-06-02 09:57:47+00:00): see wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waste=drugs and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:recycling:drugs

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183538064
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:42:40+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185570668
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-02 10:24:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13904119858

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Leo Slager (2026-06-02 21:28:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2026-06-02 21:35:32+00:00): Er staat nu 2 maal het adres  Hoofdstraat 63 op de kaart.

Ik heb het adres Hoofdstraat 83 weer op de kaart gezet en ik neem aan dat de slager Lenoir daar nog steeds zit.
kytta (2026-06-03 12:20:17+00:00): Moin und danke für deine Edits :)

Ich hab ne kurze Frage zum https://osm.org/node/13904137111 — was meinst du denn mit diameter=*? Der Key wird, soweit ich weiß, auf den Bäumen nie gesetzt
oz42 (2026-06-03 13:25:12+00:00): Wir haben das an der Schule vermessen. Letztlich reicht der Umfang wohl aus. Aber gemeint war schon der Querschnitt.
kytta (2026-06-03 14:16:10+00:00): Ach so, alles klar :) Ja es wird grundsätzlich nur der Querschnitt markiert, da man den Diameter eher schwierig messen kann ;)

Ich mache den Tag dann weg. Danke für die Aufklärung!
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-02 10:21:56+00:00): #Spam
MappingMore (2026-06-03 10:40:32+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183585251
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-02 10:21:48+00:00): #Spam
rajdhani (2026-06-03 07:14:15+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 183577319
DodoGTA (2026-06-02 10:18:59+00:00): O iš kur vertimai gaunami?
empers (2026-06-02 10:43:21+00:00): Iš žinių, Vikipedijos, autovertėjo, patikrinta su @OSM_de vokiečių redaguotojų pagalba.