piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MxxCon (2023-12-09 05:05:28+00:00): Hello.
When creating features which have names, those names should be fully spelled out without abbreviations. You created "Dover St Loop", however it should be "Dover Street Loop". You can read more about this at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(don't_do_it)

Additionally, when mapping buildings, please put a little bit more effort into accurately mapping their shapes. Buildings usually have right angles on their corners and rarely are trapezoidal or otherwise wonky. You can improve quality of your buildings by right-clicking on one and selecting "Make Square". Not only will it make your mapping look neater, but it'll also make those buildings more closely represent their real-world counterparts.

Additionally, please don't map car sale parking lots as buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144920724
1 jackson boi (2023-12-09 05:48:33+00:00): Alright thanks. Ill make sure I wont make those mistakes again.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:52:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
trigpoint (2023-12-09 00:11:32+00:00): Why?
This edit looses important information such as those estate agents  that deal work hidden away in offices to those who have a Shop Window where properties can be browsed when they are closed.

Cheers Phil
JayTurnr (2023-12-09 01:18:17+00:00): Hi Phil,

I don't believe these edits lose any degree of information. Given that the office=estate_agent tag is more popular and the shop=estate_agent wiki page mentions it's been proposed to merge the tags and that every Name Index entry for estate agents uses the more popular office tag, I determined it's worth doing some housekeeping.

The far majority of the approvals on the proposal for shop=estate_agent (which predates office=*) suggested using office=estate_agent (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Estate_Agent)

For this reason, I feel the office=estate_agent tag is the de facto correct tag.

I'd be happy to discuss over a beer/coffee if I'm ever in Shropshire.

I've stopped for now though. Been messaged by SomeoneElse about it.

Jay
Dave Venables (2023-12-10 14:36:57+00:00): I've always (six years) used office = estate_agent in Derby https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127068258 based mainly on the values defaulting from the iD editor; similar to office = lawyer or office = architect even if on the high street

I've not edited any estate agents outside of the Derby/Nottingham (and surrounding bits of Derbyshire/Nottinghamshire/East Staffordshire) area and am open to guidance or correction if another way of tagging becomes the standard (and if iD presets are updated)
SK53 (2023-12-12 20:38:36+00:00): I have always distinguished between the two shop=estate_agent for high street outlets in obvious retail premises where one can walk in browse the listings etc. In the past many were also agents for various financial service companies: I opened my first building society account in an estate agent. I reserve office=estate_agent for the big commercial agents who have offices where you ring a bell see a receptionist and more usually have a booked appointment. These are usually in business (landuse=commercial) parts of towns not in retail areas. 

The problem with perceptions of estate agents on OSM is that many countries have a much less competitive market in real estate; estate agents complete fewer transactions at much higher fee rates (~10%). I suspect that estate agents in retail locations are at a lower density in much of Europe & N. America compared with UK (specifically England & Wales).

Making all of them office=estate_agent looses this distinction, and to re-enable it would require introducing another tag estate_agent=high_street or similar (although student rental estate agents are already a significant sub-class).

Jerry
trigpoint (2023-12-13 12:25:46+00:00): As Jerry says, the difference between an office and a shop is an important distinction.

There is little point going to an office outside of its opening hours, a shop however will have photos and details of properties displayed in the window which people looking to move browse. Estate agents even put these in lit frames to make this possible. The same for travel agents, late deals are displayed in the window and are looked at by potential customers when the shop is closed.

Phil
Dave Venables (2023-12-13 13:30:40+00:00): I (and most UK mappers) have always used shop=travel_agent 1860 rather than office = travel_agent 87 (some of the offices might be corporate headquarters)

Office seems to be more common for lawyer (2963 : 8), architect (532 : 2) and estate_agent (9351 : 924) 

Most common values (shop or office) match the iD defaults but are not necessarily correct (I think  office for lawyer and architect is correct and has overwhelming popularity)

In Derby all estate agents are currently mapped as offices, in Nottingham both values are in use with no obvious split high street vs business park

Probably needs a wider discussion than just this Wem changeset
Dave Venables (2023-12-13 13:43:36+00:00): World wide office = estate_agent (77205) is used more frequently than shop = estate_agent (4228) but that does not prove that it is correct, just more popular.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:52:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
tyfi (2023-12-08 23:39:44+00:00): AE did not go south through Lake Mykee Town. That was a TIGER error. Instead, it jogs east to US 54 where it hits TT.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
habi (2024-02-02 21:15:31+00:00): "CC BY-NC-SA 4.0" ist laut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Creative_Commons#Fundamentally_incompatible inkompatibel mit OpenStreetMap, deshalb habe ich alle betreffenden Objekte in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147001087 entfernt.
Ropino (2024-02-16 15:02:37+00:00): Hi,
auch hier sind neben der Verwendung nicht zulässiger Quellen diverse Fehler eingetragen wurden, um irgendwelche historischen Daten zu erfassen die dann noch nicht mal richtig sind.
Ich bitte dich darum, keine vermuteten Daten zu verwenden.
Konkretes Beispiel:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11404326724
Die Weiche existiert seit fast 20 Jahren nicht mehr. 
Diese wurde entfernt und eine Straße gebaut. D.h.: Was nicht existiert hat auch keinen operator mehr. Selbst als historic:operator wäre "Ruhrbahn" falsch, da diese damals nicht existierte.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-09 00:10:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9065774103
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452513940

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-12-22 10:08:32+00:00): Hi, I have a question about Salar de Uyuni, this is salt desert. This is not a wetland. Yes, when there are rains it becomes a "lake" but it is not its primary geological definition. The wetland is most of the time underwater/wet, but this one is mostly dry. 

Should this remain natural=deset
5m4u9 (2023-12-23 01:49:24+00:00): Hi,

I also think that "wetland" is not the most ideal, but I restored to this tag because I wanted to standardize "temporarily" with the other salt flats of the triangle (salar atacama and salar hombre muerto).

But, the drawn area isn't exactly a "desert", this definition I think is more precise: "Salt Pans: Naturally formed salt pans are expanses of flat land, found in deserts, where the surface is covered in salt and other minerals." https://saltassociation.co.uk/education/physical-geography/

As mentioned in this comment (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:natural%3Ddesert#Widely_Misused), these natural elements should have their own tag, but as each case has different characteristics it will be difficult to standardize.

Locally in Bolivia, it isn't considered a desert, even though there are several deserts in the area. I think the area drawn has multiple tags describing parts of what it is. The tag "geological=salt_plan" could satisfy the geological description, as "tourism=attraction" satisfies the photogenic feature of the place...
5m4u9 (2023-12-23 01:51:18+00:00): ... In a first (scientific) study in 1975, the white area drawn on the map was considered a seasonal basin or seasonal evaporating lake (a tentative label could be natural=water + water=basin), but it is also considered a deposit of mineral resources (potassium, salt, magnesium, lithium, boron). The drawn area is the one that is seasonally flooded by several rivers that flow into it and a part of the rainfall.

I have yet to review some books and studies and will be proposing labels to those who edited the other salt flats.
5m4u9 (2023-12-23 01:52:40+00:00): first (scientific) study: https://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/pleins_textes/pleins_textes_7/divers2/01303.pdf
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-12-25 11:00:08+00:00): Thanks for sharing all this information.  I do agree with you that some additional tag should be introduced for these situations since it is all mentioned in the same scenario. Would you like to create a proposal for OSM Wiki?
5m4u9 (2023-12-26 21:36:28+00:00): Yes and no, as far as I read about this salar (salt flat) it is an endorheic basin (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endorheic_basin) with a salt "crust covering" brine waters from the lake.

I read "natural=playa" proposal which doesn't seem good. On the other hand, "natural=dry_lake" seems to be unopposed, but I don't agree to create new "main" tags, but maybe a sub-tag.

Combination of tags:

natural=water
intermittent=yes (because water is not present all the time)
seasonal=wet_season (to describe which seasons are with water)
salt=yes
surface=salt
geological=salt_pan (for geological feature)

I was thinking of add "basin=*" tag, but apparently in OSM it refers to man-made features.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-12-27 07:45:20+00:00): I would rather go with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Ddesert

my combination would be:

natural=desert
surface=salt
geological=salt_pan
water=lake
intermittent=yes
salt=yes
seasonal=wet_season

I think this describes it more precisely during most of the time within the year.
5m4u9 (2023-12-29 20:50:27+00:00): But, desert only describe surface feature. This "salar" is more than desert, maybe desert have to map in other area.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-09 05:31:14+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15471
watmildon (2024-01-20 02:28:22+00:00): The building geometry is generally really nice. A few corners could be squared a bit here and there. If you haven't tried using the building plugin in JOSM it's great and I strongly recommend. This is the method that I mostly use: https://hotosm.github.io/pdc-documentation/en/pages/03-josm/08-menggunakan-building-tools-di-josm/08_menggunakan_building_tools_di_josm/

You can also add the tags for building=house/garage etc. But leaving it as building=yes will prompt streetcomplete users who may be better able to see things on the ground. I have a lot of building=yes stuff in my changes.
maplemoths (2024-01-20 02:43:15+00:00): funny enough, this was my first changeset using that plugin but i just didn't use the plugin exactly correctly. i'll come over here and redo some of these houses and do some more. Thanks!
watmildon (2024-01-21 00:48:16+00:00): :thumbs-up:
maraf24 (2024-04-21 22:51:04+00:00): Jakie są kryteria odróżniające quarter od neighbourhood i suburb?
czebureks (2024-04-22 10:21:28+00:00): W przypadku "suburb" to dość proste - są to oficjalne dzielnice Gdańska, których granice są ustalone przez Radę Miasta.
Jak chodzi o rozróżnienie między "quarter" o "neighbourhood": "quarter" użyłem tam, gdzie nazwa danej części miasta funkcjonuje w potocznym wyobrażeniu mieszkańców jak osobna dzielnica, pomimo niebycia dzielnicą w sensie administracyjnym. Takie części miasta często mają dodatkowy wyróżnik, którego nie mają zwykłe osiedla: dedykowany im przystanek kolejowy (np. Kiełpinek, Firoga) lub przynajmniej węzeł transportu publicznego (np. Ujeścisko, Łostowice).
Allison P (2023-12-09 07:56:40+00:00): Hmm, I think https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1229825905 is not really covered. The structure above is enclosed but located a story above.
Swihail (2023-12-12 05:24:27+00:00): Hi Allison P,
 I will be more cautious with my future edits. Thank you for providing the feedback.
tyfi (2023-12-09 03:11:01+00:00): This one had a large bounding box due to power lines and waterways.
tyfi (2023-12-09 03:11:47+00:00): Affected routes are D (new relation), E (no relation), FF (existing relation), and M (new relation).
tyfi (2023-12-09 03:13:34+00:00): I shortened FF on its eastern terminus because it does not reach MO 15/22. State maintenance ends at South Elmwood Drive. You can see this on Bing StreetSide here: https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=39.170717%7E-91.906309&lvl=22.0&pi=-2.8&style=x&dir=275.3
emersonveenstra (2023-12-09 12:40:07+00:00): Hey there,

Looks like you copy/pasted something wrong in the tags of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10606780254 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3466807258
treestryder (2023-12-09 16:33:41+00:00): It would seem. Thanks.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-12-09 08:31:03+00:00): Hi, be careful, you've accidentally changed bus station's name
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-12-09 08:37:20+00:00): And for the airport's address you've put a Russian street name. We don't really translate addresses even if it was in a correct tag. I'll revert this changeset.
Halfix (2023-12-18 18:13:12+00:00): Hallo Derkoenig, Du hast im Rahmen dieses Changeset Teile des ehemaligen Siemens-Parkhauses und der umgebenden Wege in der Hammerbacher Str. wiederhergestellt, die bereits jemand (nicht ich) entfernt und auf Baustelle geändert hatte. Der Parkhausteil wurde vor etlichen Wochen tatsächlich abgerissen und existiert nur noch in den Luftbildern, in der Realität aber nicht mehr. Gerade im Umfeld von Baustellen, wo sich die Situation fortlaufend ändert und die Luftbilder keine Aussagekraft mehr haben, ist es ratsam, sich die Situation erst einmal vor Ort anzuschauen, bevor man Änderungen vornimmt. Da ich da gestern erst vorbeigelaufen bin und weiß, wie es dort im Moment ausschaut, werde ich den aktuellen Realzustand wieder einzeichnen.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-12-09 08:33:15+00:00): building addresses are mostly managed automatically. It's like housenumber added to Kurmäe hostel will get erased since it's missing in official sources.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-12-09 08:33:34+00:00): *It's like => it's likely
i2004 (2023-12-09 13:30:46+00:00): hace varios meses que el 168 colegiales extendio hasta san isidro
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-09 05:11:39+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15469
arjunaraoc (2023-12-19 00:18:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). check my updates  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145271377#map=19/12.94719/74.80922 ; https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145271330
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144924869
Nakaner-repair (2024-02-27 16:43:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 147981143 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by MMHHB (MAPS.ME junk).
limes11 (2023-12-12 21:23:26+00:00): Hi,

danke für das Einzeichnen des NSGs. Bitte versuche dabei keine Punkte mit den landuse-Flächen zu verkleben. Das macht die Pflege sehr unhandlich. 

Besten Dank

Limes
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-09 06:50:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/653445121

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-11 04:14:58+00:00): poprawione
Ian Wagner (2023-12-09 06:51:51+00:00): 공항고등학교 is no longer located in this location. I couldn’t tell exactly from driving by but it looks like the other school may have taken over the whole grounds.
Minh Nguyen (2023-12-12 18:09:47+00:00): Thanks for going through and resolving these discrepancies!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-05 18:54:16+00:00): name=Skil tech unifoam and making centre
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11404942372

shop=microenterprise ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?