piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
miluethi (2024-05-24 16:48:15+00:00): Hi Billy,
Please square out all your building additions. Just select a building shape and press the "Q" key.
I corrected all your buildings in Nicaragua.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-25 08:38:48+00:00): Please don't tag relation members the same as the relation. reverted
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151775303
miluethi (2024-05-24 16:30:42+00:00): Branco1,
Please square out all buildings in OSM. Just press the "Q" with a selected shape.
I also noticed that some building shapes a significantly larger than the sat imagery. Please narrow down your building shapes.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
MxxCon (2024-05-26 05:42:03+00:00): Hello.
Shouldn't most of them be "dismount" rather than "no"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151775921
Corey Kosak (2024-05-27 20:48:18+00:00): I think for consistency with the paths they connect to (which are marked as "no"), these should also be "no".
rskedgell (2024-05-24 15:23:31+00:00): * Added house numbers from out of copyright OS maps, specifically NLS - OS 1:1,250/1:2,500 National Grid maps, 1947-1963
habib_amir (2024-05-28 03:35:47+00:00): Откуда информация?
habib_amir (2024-05-28 03:49:18+00:00): Тег covered был лишний
flierfy (2024-05-30 17:57:04+00:00): Информация поступает от соседних элементов.
felipeeugenio (2024-05-25 15:46:43+00:00): Hola. Un SAR no es un hospital. por favor cuidado con estas ediciones. Los edificios que borró ya no existen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151776899
felipeeugenio (2024-05-25 15:47:56+00:00): Ademán movió el registro civl que quedaba en Chacabuco a otra calle. Cuál es la nueva dirección? porque sigue apareciendo como en Chacabuco
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151776899
felipeeugenio (2024-05-25 15:49:16+00:00): Y por último, building= es para las estructuras, no para el recinto completo. Dejó la DV como un edificio entero.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151776899
felipeeugenio (2024-05-25 15:54:34+00:00): Ahí corregí todo. por favor ser más cuidadoso con las ediciones.
HenriSaucisse (2024-05-25 19:25:57+00:00): Hola Felipe... Sí, respecto al SAR de Cauquenes, el inmueble es el mismo que era el del Liceo pero desde 2015 que es SAR y el edificio es otro completamente distinto. En cuanto al Chilexpress, desde el 2020 está ubicado en calle Maipú entre Victoria y Yungay, mientras que el edificio de vialidad aparecía como "Pub". Gracias por la corrección, tomaré en cuenta cuando edite cambios de edificios y otros de gobierno. Saludos.
mcliquid (2024-05-24 17:06:03+00:00): Hallo und vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag,

bitte beachte jedoch: Changesets sollten lokal sein.

In deinem Fall bitte vor dem Ortswechsel immer alle Änderungen in StreetComplete hochladen!

Um Konflikte zu vermeiden und aus Höflichkeit gegenüber anderen wird empfohlen:
• Änderungen in einem kleinen geografischen Bereich zu kombinieren (innerhalb einer Stadt, eines Bezirks oder einer Provinz)
• Änderungen innerhalb desselben Landes zu halten
• Änderungen hochzuladen/speichern, bevor man in einem anderen Gebiet weiterkartiert

Warum? Schau dir den Abschnitt "Geographische Größe von Changesets" auf dieser Wiki-Seite an:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Danke für die Berücksichtigung, einen schönen Tag noch und fröhliches Mappen!
bxl-forever (2024-05-24 16:18:28+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for this.

Two questions, if you don’t mind:

1) Was this based on your own survey?  I am asking because I still have personal notes when I surveyed the different parts of the station some time ago and I spot a few differences.

2) There is a standalone node here that should either be attached to a track or deleted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11930996432

Thanks.
zorglubu (2024-05-24 16:53:56+00:00): Please, try to save your modifications before gpoing to another region.

Here you have modified ways near Paris and some other ones near Angoulême.
All contributors watching a village inside the orange rectangle have received a notification.

It would also be nice for the other contributors to describe what you have done, in the comment of the changeset.
Thank you very much in advance.
dieterdreist (2026-06-17 08:37:50+00:00): Ciao Edrux, ho notato che hai rimosso e ridisegnato i frammenti del acquedotto Claudio. Noi cerchiamo di mantenere lo storico e invece di sostituire le geometrie è molto meglio migliorarle.
Sammyhawkrad (2024-05-24 17:15:41+00:00): Hi Prince,
note that the name=* tag is used to add formal names of objects and not a description of any kind. Kindly review this edit and remove "maped you building" as the building name.

Welcome to OSM!

Regards,
Sam
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-25 21:35:27+00:00): left disconnected roads
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151778388
Enock4seth (2024-05-25 13:06:37+00:00): Hi, 
the name field is reserved for the real name of feature eg. Old Fadama Basic School. Don't add "Fadama" as the name of buildings. 

Also check for existing data, here buildings, not to add overlaps and duplicates. 

You can remove the names from these buildings and also delete overlapping ones.

Happy mapping!
map per (2024-06-07 07:38:20+00:00): Hallo UKausch,

ich wollte dir nur Bescheid sagen, das ich bei dem Gebäude (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1286335036) building=yes wieder eingetragen hab.

Viele Grüße
map per
UKausch (2024-06-14 15:53:11+00:00): Hallo map per,
danke für die Ergänzung.
Servus
Uwe
MxxCon (2024-05-26 05:44:03+00:00): Hello.
Please split your edits into smaller geographic regions. There's no reason for such a changeset to contain edits from both Maine and Louisiana.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151779315
eggie (2024-05-25 05:05:35+00:00): Beste Db  Wat is je bron in deze?

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151779920
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-25 05:23:44+00:00): Gebruik als achtergrond de PDOK actueel. 
Gebouwen importeren we vanuit de BAG  We tekenen dus niet zelf in. Een medemapper is na jou hier ook al aan de slag gegaan.
Het enorme gebouw dat je intekende bestaat niet.
MVG
eggie
5m4u9 (2024-05-25 06:08:09+00:00): Hola, gracias por añadir la senda, me parece que un mejor nombre es el que mencionas en el resumen del cambio, así lo apliqué a la senda.
Metzor (2024-05-25 07:21:28+00:00): Hallo opsmand,

Brouter suspects hat mich hierher geschickt. Das folgende Straßenstück kann laut deinem Tagging in beide Richtungen befahren werden. Jedoch gibt es am westlichen Zipfel keine Zufahrtsmöglichkeit. Dadurch wird es als "dead-start" klassifiziert.
Das kann darauf hindeuten, dass das Stückchen als Einbahnstraße getaggt werden sollte oder dass ein Anschluss fehlt.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32228152#map=19/48.09080/10.07590&layers=N

Ich war kurz davor, die Einbahnstraße zu taggen, bis ich gesehen habe, dass das nördlich angrenzende Grundstück vielleicht der Grund ist, dass die Einbahnstraße erst näher beim Kreisel anfängt. Kannst du das mit deiner Ortskenntnis entscheiden?

Im letzteren Fall könnte man die Grundstückszufahrt mappen.

Danke und viele Grüße
Metzor
ospsmand (2024-05-28 20:20:27+00:00): Hallo Metzor,

der Abruf des Gedächtnisprotokolls sagt: "Bitte als Einbahnstraße taggen."

Ich habe die Änderung bereits vorgenommen.

Besten Dank und viele Grüße
ospsmand
Metzor (2024-05-29 06:57:02+00:00): Danke!
Dimitar155 (2024-06-06 19:28:50+00:00): Привет Боби,

На това място се е появила нова сграда (https://www.osm.org/way/1290083835). Само Sinsay ли има или има и други магазини?

Поздрави,
Митко
Boyan Alexiev (2024-06-24 09:15:52+00:00): Здравей Митко, 
За сега има само Sinsay. Строи се още нещо в съседсто, но когато бях на място не ходих до табелата все още.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/dXPTap86X73iux5K6
Dimitar155 (2024-06-25 06:41:00+00:00): Ясно, приемам че за момента цялата сграда е Sinsay. Линка къв Мапса не съм го гледал.
mueschel (2024-05-25 13:27:52+00:00): Hi,
please check these buildings, they all got some strange "|ODS" tags.
daganzdaanda (2024-12-18 10:53:47+00:00): Salut Montanhès!

Thanks for adding information to the map!
Could you please explain what you mean with the "Plugs" that you added in some places? You have mapped them as a 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Delectrical
but I do not think that is fitting very well.
If it is an electrical outlet, then maybe 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Doutlet
would be better?

All the best, 
daganzdaanda
Montanhès (2024-12-18 11:31:50+00:00): Hello there,

Thank you for your very useful comment.
In fact, what you suggested is exactly what I wanted to add : power outlet.
I just couldn't find it. Sorry. 

By the way, I've been blocked from editing the map since July of this year. Is there anyway to know why ? This is making me so sad. :(

Best regards,
Montanhès
daganzdaanda (2024-12-18 12:34:27+00:00): Hi,

thanks for the quick reply!
OSM has a lot of tags, it is not easy to find the perfect one :-)
Also, power outlets are not something that has been mapped very often, so I am guessing that OsmAnd will not have a preset to use.
If you want, I can change your "Plugs" to the better tagging.

About not being able to edit any more - my guess is, that you were logging in with an old authorization method. See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/oauth-1-0a-and-http-basic-auth-shutdown/108490

I also found the info that OAuth 2.0 is supported in OsmAnd since version 4.8
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/anmeldung-auf-osmand/119768/4

So if possible, try and update OsmAnd and then see if it works.
Or try another editor to check if the problem still occurs. 

In my opinion, OsmAnd anyway isn't really the best way to add things to OSM while on the road - try apps that focus on this job, like Every Door or StreetComplete. Maybe also give Vespucci a chance, which is a very powerful editor for Android.
Montanhès (2024-12-18 15:27:54+00:00): Hello again,

The solution you suggested has worked for me, I can now edit the map again.
You have my sincere gratitude. Thanks so much.

Is there any way to modify all the "plugs" at the same time or is it necessary to do it manually ?
If you can do it in a simple and easy way that would be great. I must admit I don't really know how to edit my previous contributions.

I'll have a look at both apps you mentionned.

Thank you 😊

Best regards,
Montanhès
daganzdaanda (2024-12-18 18:26:12+00:00): Hi Montanhès,

no worries, I have fixed the tagging: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160363420

I used https://overpass-turbo.eu to find all nodes with "name"="Plug" and "shop"="electrical", then opened the result in JOSM and changed the tags.

If you ever have a question, feel free to ask :-) 
Also, the forums are a great place to get information and help: https://community.openstreetmap.org
Montanhès (2025-01-18 17:34:31+00:00): Hello there,

Thank you so much for editing it and sorry for the late answer. I'll check the forums.

Have a great weekend. :)
Gregory Peony (2024-07-28 01:19:21+00:00): WAY: 1286346152 is probably the most accurate footprint of the ones you added and I've seen. Alignment to imagery still seems poor, but the size, shape and orientation are certainly significanlty better than others.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151781483
Gregory Peony (2024-07-28 00:50:55+00:00): Generally these building footprints are inaccurate and not well aligned to bing imagery. The following buildings should not be mapped as quadrilaterals based on only aerial imagery; WAY: 1286347784, WAY: 1286347761, WAY: 1286347756, WAY: 1286347779, WAY: 1286347763. The following ways envelope multiple buildings; WAY: 1286347784, WAY: 1286347775, WAY: 1286347766, WAY: 1286347759, WAY: 1286347787.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151781661
Tomas Straupis (2024-05-25 05:36:41+00:00): Kluonalių adresai irgi pabėgo.
akimapbuilder (2024-05-27 06:19:14+00:00): When adding building, try to follow building footprints and match the geometry. Cheers!
Tomas Straupis (2024-05-25 05:35:36+00:00): Labas. O ką darom su Kretingsodžio adresais? Dabar Kretingsodžio adresai Kretingoje išplėstame plote. Laukiam oficialių, ar iš karto keičiam addr:city=Kretinga, jei tu jau tiksliai žinai, kad jie visi taps Kretinga?
Witska (2024-05-25 14:23:58+00:00): Labas. Kiek girdėjau mėnesio bėgyje bus pakeisti gatvių pavadinimai kurie sutampa su Kretingos, manau galima keisti add:city į Kretingą.
Tomas Straupis (2024-05-25 15:24:47+00:00): Sutarta!
Vinber-Pro (2024-05-25 15:23:46+00:00): Bonjour,
ceux sont bien des noms de rue, arrêt de bus qui sont écrit dans les 2 langues, cela n'est pas de la "traduction" ? 
Et je ne comprend pas pourquoi vous ajoutez la source=ieo-bdtopoc à chaque objet, l'ajout au changeset est suffisant je pense.

à plus
Vinber-Pro (2024-05-25 15:24:14+00:00): et l'emprise est un peu grande ici, peut-être favoriser des zones plus petites ?
Glassman (2024-05-25 20:37:43+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151782802
tuxayo (2025-07-15 02:51:59+00:00): Androna Picho ou Androna Pichona?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182149366/history#map=19/43.369330/5.308569

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13820315/history
Glassman (2024-05-25 20:38:03+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151782913
Gregory Peony (2024-07-28 01:22:09+00:00): If you want more feed back, then get in touch. You could also check these out; If you want to experience the OSM community I encourage you to attend a mapathon [here's](https://www.tickettailor.com/events/missingmapslondon?) one that occurs regularly.

You can find other events [here](https://osmcal.org/)

Learning resources and links can be found [here](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151783267
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-28 18:20:21+00:00): edycja wycofana w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151958125
JeroenHoek (2024-05-25 09:32:31+00:00): Serieus. What the fuck?

Je gooit nu complete rijbanen weg omdat je een andere stijl verkiest. Zoals ze ingetekend waren is daar prima. Als je dit compleet anders wil dan is eerst even overleggen wel zo netjes. Dit vind ik echt zwaar teleurstellend van je.
JeroenvanderGun (2024-05-25 14:37:25+00:00): Ik neem aan dat je de rechtsaffers bedoelt? Dit zijn geen fysiek gescheiden rijbanen en het is dan ongebruikelijk en verwarrend om ze toch als aparte rijbaan in te tekenen. Of zie ik een bijzondere reden over het hoofd om hier van dat algemene principe af te wijken?

Er zaten overigens nog diverse andere correcties en aanvullingen in mijn wijzigingen.
JeroenHoek (2024-05-25 17:25:50+00:00): Daar is eerder wel discussie over geweest. Het is een persoonlijke voorkeur, maar ook gewoon valide wanneer de geometrie zo ver afwijkt van de hoofdrijbaan dat dit logischer is.  Het gaat hier daarnaast om behoorlijke tweebaansafslagen.

Valide details weggooien omdat je het zelf anders zou doen is not-done.

Daarnaast creëer je ook een highway=primary naar trunk overgang waar geen kruising is. Al het verkeer wat vanaf de kruising richting de autoweg rijdt komt op de autoweg uit, dus verandert de plaats in de hiërarchie niet bij dit deel van de N355 (van primary naar trunk). Dat kunnen we nu met motorroad=no prima ondersteunen voor dit soort verbindingsstukken. De wegenhiërarchie verandert dus pas op het kruispunt.

Prima om zaken zoals zone:traffic goed in te voeren, maar om dat nou te doen in een set changesets met bovenstaande onder de noemer 'Verbeteringen kruispunt' is niet zo tof.
JeroenvanderGun (2024-05-27 19:08:22+00:00): Oké, ik heb mijn overige wijzigingen opnieuw toegepast (nu dus met behoud van rechtsaffers en highway=trunk). De rechtsaffers leken mij niet-valide maar ik kan je gedachte volgen. Over de trunk-classificatie heb ik een topic geopend op het forum (dat je inmiddels al gezien hebt).
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-24 18:30:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11931330874

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-24 18:30:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11931322434

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Glassman (2024-05-25 20:39:12+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151784250
marc__marc (2026-01-06 15:15:23+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1088042272
un trottoir n'est pas une piste cyclable sur lequel on autorise le piéton à aller après le passage piéton :)
highflyer74 (2024-06-13 08:13:01+00:00): Hallo!

Danke für Deinen Beitrag! Bitte beachte, dass Namen in OSM nur für Objekte vergeben werden, die auch wirklich einen Namen haben. Beispielsweise hat eine Bank nicht den Namen "Sitzbank". Dass es sich um eine Bank handelt, ist bereit durch das entsprechende Attribut (in OSM Tag genannt) klar.

Danke, dass Du bei weiteren Bearbeitungen daran denkst :-)

Viele Grüße!
literan (2024-05-26 14:43:04+00:00): название сменилось; а другие теги поменять?
HirschKauz (2024-05-26 07:38:04+00:00): Hi!  
kleiner Tipp, nachdem man ein Gebäude gezeichnet hat kann man [Q] tippen und schon ist das Gebäude rechtwinklig :-)
Und zu den Adressen gehört auch der Ortsteil: zB addr:suburb=Liblar 
Grüße und... have fun
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151785407
akimapbuilder (2024-05-27 06:27:46+00:00): You draw building over backyard, try to avoid that. Thanks
ValeBG (2024-06-20 14:50:32+00:00): Come mai è stato cancellato questo tracciato??
ValeBG (2024-06-20 15:12:13+00:00): Why is been cancelled? this trail exist, I have done 30 days Ago!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151785877
Frans S (2024-06-03 12:16:50+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
About tagging of waterways.
To keep it simple: When you can jump over it , tag it as a stream. otherwise as river.
Best regards
NeisBot (2024-05-24 19:39:24+00:00): Hi Tomokino, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/node/11931445318

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-25 06:44:28+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151786898
NeisBot (2024-05-24 19:42:24+00:00): Hi Tomokino, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/node/11931486705

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-25 06:45:53+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151786855
ValeBG (2024-06-20 15:11:40+00:00): Why is been cancelled?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151786100
NeisBot (2024-05-24 19:42:24+00:00): Hi Tomokino, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/node/11931440954

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
sheikchilli (2024-05-24 20:09:18+00:00): fake beach / pokemon go player

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151786816
NeisBot (2024-05-24 19:45:25+00:00): Hi Tomokino, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/157248774

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
sheikchilli (2024-05-24 20:08:46+00:00): fake beach / pokemon go player

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151786804
NeisBot (2024-05-24 19:45:25+00:00): Hi Tomokino, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/node/11931478029

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
sheikchilli (2024-05-24 20:08:10+00:00): fake beach / pokemon go player

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151786790
NeisBot (2024-05-24 19:45:25+00:00): Hi Tomokino, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/node/11931464679

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
sheikchilli (2024-05-24 20:07:21+00:00): fake beach / pokemon go player

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151786757