piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2025-02-22 09:42:31+00:00): Moin :)

du bist hier ja einmal quer über die nördliche Hälfte des Bundesgebiets gesprungen. Das macht es etwas unbequem, deine Änderung zu analysieren. Daher meine Bitte für die Zukunft:
Keep it local :)
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=162790879#7/52.167/10.597
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

happy mapping
BrummsLee (2025-02-22 11:24:26+00:00): Hallo silversurfer!
Ich bin mir gar keiner Schuld bewußt... so weit nördlich war ich eigentlich nicht "unterwegs". Sorry!
Hab jetzt mal geschaut. Es war ein Hinweis von Osmose für den polnischen Ort Stolzenburg.  
Node 31581237 
Da wurde das "is_in" als veraltet angemerkt und ich habe das dann von den Werten "county", "province" und "municipality" entfernt. Also keine großen Sachen und auch nicht flächendeckend.
Am Multipolygon im Nützenbergpark habe ich nur zwei nicht miteinander verbundene Nodes verbunden. Die wurde wohl wegen der doppelten Geometrie durch Osmose bemängelt. Ich hab da leider gar nicht aufgepaßt, in welchem Bereich ich mich da bewege, sorry.
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-22 07:33:39+00:00): Hello gkkes, welcome to OSM.

In this changeset, some types of highway are being modified by you. Could we learn something about the sources used? Thank you.

More information about the changeset: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=17491495
SzymonH (2025-02-24 08:14:31+00:00): Przy tej edycji zniknęło połączenie tej drogi z główną jezdnią: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444257708
Marek-M (2025-02-24 08:51:33+00:00): Dzięki za zauważenie błędu. Już poprawiłem: https://www.osm.org/changeset/162881740
NeisBot (2025-02-27 09:36:03+00:00): Hi KORAYREİS, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 67 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

PS: I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
skorpion62 (2025-02-24 08:31:02+00:00): Hallo JanKardal,
schön, dass Du mithilfst OSM zu verbessern.
Nur zur Info, bei Öffnungszeiten und Telefonnummern auf richtige Schreibweise achten. 
Siehe hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone

Ich wünsche Dir weiterhin frohes Mappen.

Viele Grüße 
skorpion62
Fraxi (2025-02-21 19:42:27+00:00): Здравейте!
Благодаря за добавянето на този обект! От таговете му разбирам, че се намира на ул. "Майстор Павел от Кримин" №32, което се намира тук-https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226679756
Премествам обекта.
kitsee (2025-02-22 21:14:21+00:00): Hi Nathan, 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1283395924 are not correct. The B4276 stops at the the small roundabout and does not continue to the A465. I suspect eventually it will follow Swansea road.
Nathan_A_RF (2025-02-22 21:27:10+00:00): If you want to be pedantic, then yes, but for ease of routing during the roadworks I have switched it to secondary now (the more likely route for this road, I doubt it will go to Swansea Road). Being pedantic means also changing the ramps on this interchange and others to trunk_link now, but for ease of routing trunk is used along with the road name.
kitsee (2025-02-22 21:28:27+00:00): I've doubled checked my footage and it appears the B4276 terminates at the roundabout. the signs leading to the roundabout are marked with "leading to backets" (B4276). as its neither a A or B road I've downgraded it to a tertiary
kitsee (2025-02-22 21:29:59+00:00): sorry i didnt see your comment in time. I'm not being pedantic. The final signage has been put up and i surveyed it yesturday. The signage is clear on where the B4276 ends
Nathan_A_RF (2025-02-22 21:35:01+00:00): Knowing sign designers, it seems many don't understand how brackets work. Signs alone isn't a valid source.
kitsee (2025-02-22 21:47:58+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground
On the ground It is mapped as (B4276) which means as stated by the "know your traffic signs" government publication "Route numbers in brackets are roads that will be reached by following the route indicated." meaning it is not that road number but it leads to that road number. Following the "Map what's on the ground" principle even if you found a contradicting source, the signage on the ground would take precedence. This is not the first time I've made this correction either. The changeset where I corrected this last has "Survey" listed as a source and  I can provide images of the signs in question on request. You overruled my changes with no sources, no discussion and no justification.
Nathan_A_RF (2025-02-22 22:11:27+00:00): Trust me, as an expert in traffic signs, and having designed a few myself in the past, you can't trust those alone as a source. Fine leave it for now, but no doubt it will be changed back upon roadworks completing.
watmildon (2025-02-22 22:16:00+00:00): "for ease of routing during the roadworks"

Alas, we map things are they are (signed) and not as we wish they would be ("easy for routers").
Nathan_A_RF (2025-02-22 22:26:18+00:00): So would you like to change https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1283395949 and other associated ways to trunk_link now then?
watmildon (2025-02-22 22:35:09+00:00): My comment is merely reflecting on the fact that "ease of routing" isn't a reason to change things in OSM. If, following standard practice (local highway classification guide, map ground truth etc), you think those need to be changed, please feel free to change them.
kitsee (2025-02-22 22:38:53+00:00): The signs I am working off are the final permanent signage that has been installed in recent months as part of the construction. construction on everything other than the A465 flyover and Swansea road is complete and the current alignment is the final alignment. you can see the signs yourself here https://imgur.com/a/I1MkABM. But its very obvious on the ground where the road starts. I dont have a problem with the ramps like this as the ramps currently are the main carriageway until the flyover is built. I sure there is a reason why the B4276 hasn't been extended to the A465 or swansea road however just because we dont like it doesnt mean its not correct.
Nathan_A_RF (2025-02-23 11:01:30+00:00): Again, I wouldn't be surprised if all those brackets are botches, unless Swansea Road from the A470 to Baverstock Junction is made an A or B-road, which I highly doubt.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-23 18:30:41+00:00): "Signs alone isn't a valid source." it definitely trumps edits stating no source at all

if you are reverting edits based on ground survey you really, really should clearly state you sources
Joseph R P (2025-02-21 23:51:57+00:00): Hello. Please note that roads are not classified based on length but rather on the basis of connectivity with other roads and places and importance within the road network, and occasionally other factors such as traffic data and physical construction of the roadway. In this case, Smoke Ranch serves as a relatively busy arterial which serves commercial areas, and when combined with Carey Avenue, spans many other major roadways Between Buffalo and Nellis Blvd. Tertiary classification, in an urban scenario like this, usually applies to smaller, lower-traffic but still important roadways which we would call collector roads.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-03-23 20:49:03+00:00): I might need more help with tertiary roads. For instance, why is Upland Blvd a tertiary road (when it's in a residential area) but Evergreen Ave a residential road? (Yes, it's in a residential area, but it connects two or three neighborhoods. Thus, I would consider it a tertiary road east of Jones Blvd.) On the other hand, Upland Blvd doesn't seem to connect neighborhoods together.
Joseph R P (2025-03-23 22:35:35+00:00): Upland Blvd. is a prime example of a tertiary road in which it is not a high-capacity arterial like Alta but it sees more traffic than a typical residential street. It is wider and and has lane markings, which are often signs that a street serves as a collector road. Compare that to Evergreen Ave, which is narrow, lacks lane markings, and has many speed bumps to discourage higher-speed through traffic (though some tertiary roads will have speed bumps here and there). This is an indication that Evergreen is intended to be a local neighborhood street that consequentially sees more through traffic due to it making a beeline through multiple neighborhoods and major streets.

Additional context can be found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtertiary
silversurfer83 (2025-02-22 09:50:10+00:00): Moin york21 :)

war das Absicht, dass du da zwei Abschnitte unbenannt bzw unbearbeitet gelassen hast?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162791724
york21 (2025-02-22 10:28:41+00:00): Moin silversurfer82,

nein, Danke für den Hinweis, ich hab es gerade erledigt.
Gruß

York21
silversurfer83 (2025-02-22 10:31:45+00:00): Perfekt. Danke
mariotomo (2025-02-24 06:35:58+00:00): hei. I'm reviewing edits in the country. would you mind please describing your edits? thank you!
BigKev97 (2025-04-28 13:21:32+00:00): With pleasure.
Broken Butler (2025-02-22 07:34:13+00:00): Sorry about the misalignment, but what do you base the turn restriction on if I may ask?
Cause when I went there my bus definitely took a right turn there coming from the highway (coming from tblisi). This is why I changed the turn restrictions.
mos_next_door (2025-02-22 09:34:14+00:00): A couple of months ago they drew a solid line that blocks this exact turn from Myasnikyan ave to Abovyan st., forcing the traffic through Sharimanyan st. I live nearby and use this road extensively, used this right turn myself for 2 years :)
Broken Butler (2025-02-22 09:42:47+00:00): Ahhh, that explains it then, my bad I was mostly basing myself on the bus that I had taken last summer. And inaccurate turn restrictions are frequent enough that I honestly thought it's a simple mistake.
My bad, thanks for explaining :)
mos_next_door (2025-02-22 09:54:44+00:00): No worries, I kinda understand this whole junction looks messy and mistake-like. But this particular case reflects mess on the ground :)
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-21 18:31:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/980134873

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Michaall99 (2025-02-21 18:51:41+00:00): Cześć, witaj na OSM, dzięki za edycję. Chciałbym jednak zwrócić uwagę na oznaczenie adresu, zgodnie z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:* tag addr:city i addr:street powinieneś zastąpić tagiem: addr:place.

Proszę, zapoznaj się z wiki i popraw swoją edycję. Pozdrawiam.
Michaall99 (2025-03-02 21:31:04+00:00): Poprawione.
JoshuaSh (2025-02-22 19:31:20+00:00): Thanks for adding details to the map!

I just wanted to let you know that having the footways present is still useful for routing, so there is no need to delete them. I have already restored them so there is nothing you need to worry about. Please keep this in mind when making edits in the future.
Lejun (2025-06-14 13:50:25+00:00): Merci de ne pas découper les giratoires sans raison physique valable. Les relations d'itinéraires les gèrent correctement sans.
Userinexile (2025-03-02 06:29:56+00:00): 个人认为没有必要把路侧人行道独立画出，有的地方画有的地方不画很割裂，也不利于导航，在主路标注sidewalk=*足矣
AngocA (2025-03-12 04:33:35+00:00): Hola
He visto que estás agregando detalles al mapa, eso está muy bien.
Solo quiero decirte que procures mapear los ríos y quebradas con la dirección igual a la del cauce, aguas abajo. Por lo tanto, procura trazar todo el río hasta que encuentres otro río.
Te lo digo por este río que "sube la montaña": https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1361760756/history

Cordialmente,


Andrés Gómez
baprischka (2025-10-04 18:24:41+00:00): Ciao, metti la fonte dei tuoi cambiamenti nel campo "source" delle tue modifiche e non usando il tag "source" perché poi non si sa quali informazioni provengono da questa fonte e quali no.
Branko Kokanovic (2025-03-07 14:00:52+00:00): Zdravo, njive ne treba da imaju imena, dovoljno je ucrtati ih. Takodje, mislim da je ovo previse detalja, dovoljno je da sve njive budu obuhvacene jedniм "landuse" poligonom
LordGarySugar (2025-02-21 21:11:28+00:00): Hi, could you please use more descriptive comments? corrections & updates on every changeset is not helpful.

Additionally, why are you removing Arabic and Berber languages from many names? Members of the Algerian community have agreed that the name field should use all three languages, not French only in a country where Algerian Arabic is the most commonly spoken language.
MistikRuz (2025-02-22 12:21:59+00:00): Hi, members of the Algerian community agreed that the name field should use all three languages; a link please on this consensus

here is what I found
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Alg%C3%A9rie6
6 semi-official languages ​​in Algeria
Arabic
French
Kabyle https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:kab
Berber in Tifinagh character https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tifinagh
Berber in Latin character https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berber_Latin_alphabet
Berber in Arabic character https://www.aps.dz/tamazight-arb/
MistikRuz (2025-02-22 12:25:16+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Alg%C3%A9rie
Fizzie-DWG (2025-02-25 05:19:04+00:00): Quite extensive discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/the-use-of-the-name-tag-across-algeria/72256
MistikRuz (2025-03-07 18:43:22+00:00): Hi,
The language of naming localities in Algeria on OSM is not subject to specific management rules.
To this end, each of us applies a naming language of his choice.
If I refer to the OSM discussion forum, I do not see any naming rules,
I believe I felt that everyone defends their mother tongue through these nominations, this is why each person names a region in his language of choice, then another person comes in to modify and therefore deletes the previous one.
What is the official naming language on OSM?
How can we modify the nomination without having attenuated the other naming languages?
The answer to these questions truly constitutes a desire to establish an order in the naming of localities.
Best regards
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-14 01:06:12+00:00): Your personal opinion seems to be in contrast to the local community? I've just raised a new thread at the Forum for discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/names-in-algeria/127362 so please make your thoughts known there.
Syl (2025-02-26 09:14:17+00:00): Bonjour, l'emplacement du défibrillateur n'a pas l'air correspondre à la photo dans la note. Quelle source avez-vous utilisé pour confirmer sa position ?
HugoC01 (2025-03-02 15:38:56+00:00): Merci pour ta remarque Syl.
C'est corrigé, je m'était trompé d'endroit.
eggie (2025-02-21 22:04:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
urrary (2025-02-22 03:45:48+00:00): Приветствую.
Волею случая мы одновременно отредактировали оз.Ихолайни.
Озеро переделано в мультиполигон, чтобы нарисовать окресности.Надеюсь, это не сильно помешает вашим дальнейшим планам.
kartler175 (2025-02-24 15:56:06+00:00): Please fix:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-73.69261&lat=45.40418&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

By the way: JOSM provides a validation tool which detects such issues before data upload
Carl Nowack (2025-02-24 18:09:11+00:00): Corrected in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162903661
michael_ua (2025-02-22 16:26:01+00:00): This changeset was reverted due to vandalism.

woyelev04, please follow the street naming conventions https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B8#%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%B2%D1%96%D0%B7%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%83_%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B8_%C2%AB%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%B2%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%96%C2%BB

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162823039
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-02 10:52:31+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17347
MistikRuz (2025-03-07 18:27:28+00:00): Bonjour,
La langue de nomination des localités en Algérie sur OSM n'est pas soumise à des règles de gestion spécifiques.
À cet effet, chacun d'entre nous applique une langue de nomination de son de choix.
Si je me réfère au forum de discussion OSM, je ne vois  aucune règle de nomination,
Je crois avoir ressenti que chacun défend sa langue maternelle à travers ces nominations, c'est pour cette raison que chaque acteur nomme une région dans sa langue de choix, puis un autre acteur vient modifier et donc supprimer la langue de nomination exercée par son précédent.
Quelle est la langue officielle de nomination sur OSM?
Comment peut-on entreprendre des nominations sans avoir atténué les autres langues de nomination?
La réponse à ses questions constitue véritablement une volonté d'établir un ordre dans la nomination des localités.
Bien à vous
Vaidotas (2025-02-22 10:54:10+00:00): After updating "maxspeed" tag, please update "source:maxspeed" value as well, if such tag was previously set. Changing only "maxspeed" creates inconsistencies between "maxspeed" and "source:maxspeed", and it is hard to verify potential mistakes.
literan (2025-02-22 16:27:07+00:00): если там стройка, то логичнее сделать construction=unclassified
highway=construction

поправил
SomeoneElse (2025-02-28 13:27:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162736067 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17316
eggie (2025-02-21 22:07:11+00:00): Dag Roy  Svp geen accesstags op verkeerslichten zetten.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162795347
MVG
eggie
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-22 07:26:33+00:00): Hi woyelev04, welcome to OSM.

In the past 12 hours, you have made numerous name changes across various changesets. This included modifying Ukrainian names as well as removing other name:*. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.

You can find an overview of the recent changesets at the following link: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=162795511
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-22 07:27:43+00:00): Sorry, here is the correct link:
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=22546590
eggie (2025-02-21 22:10:15+00:00): Tip  Kijk hier even voor de juiste tagging van de verschillende fietspaden.
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway

MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-21 20:50:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9288259160

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse (2025-02-21 21:36:24+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
You've changed a number of river names here, and people are wondering what the reason for that change was.
The river in OSM previously reflected the view in other older maps, such as OS OpenData StreetView from 2016 https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#15/51.6462/-1.8847/6 (see the "River Thames or Isis" and "River Churn" labels) and also OS OpenMap Local https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#15/51.6456/-1.8876/2 (again, "River Thames" and "River Churn" labels).
There's a discussion going on about this in the forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/possible-vandalism/126188 .  Please do explain there what the reason for the change was.  If you're unable to do that, we'll have to change the names back.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2025-02-28 13:27:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163052641 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes to the River Thames - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162736067 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17316
user_5359 (2025-02-22 11:50:47+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/149236364. What is the mean of the tags
construction = nursery
onstruction = kindergarten
which construction vaue is correct?!
mcliquid (2025-02-22 07:26:08+00:00): Danke dir!
Clara Barber (2025-02-21 21:17:29+00:00): I own a new barbershop and am trying to get the building and business listed at 114 North 7th Street.
Clara Barber (2025-02-21 21:13:53+00:00): I'm trying to list my building 114 North 7th Street so I can use check in for Facebook. I believe this is the issue I am facing that this building does not exist on Openstreetmaps.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-21 21:26:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Nowowiejskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12608035677
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12608035678
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12608035679

"Marii Rodziewiczówny":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12608035816
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12608036708

"Zaścianek":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12608035948
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12608036452
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12608036453

"Świerkowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12608035952
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12608035953
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12608036004
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12608036005
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12608036006
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12608036007
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12608036008
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12608036454
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12608036455
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12608036456
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12608036507
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12608036508

"Chabrowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12608036208

"Marcina Stacheckiego-Koliba":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12608036687

Pozdrawiam! 🦀