piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mapperaid (2026-06-11 17:58:12+00:00): Please stop tagging all of the ways on this junction as construction. This junction is not closed for construction. It is under construction, but is open for and actively being used for driving and passing through. When you are tagging all of the ways as "construction", you are bringing errors to the routing services. Routing engines will ignore this road because of your edits not leaving a single open/passable way. The junction is still passable. Take a look at the drone video: https://www.instagram.com/p/DXS4veCiH1B/
iuvi (2026-06-12 15:43:30+00:00): Fair comment, anyhow Berry thanks for your work anyhow
BerryTrails (2026-06-15 11:08:07+00:00): mapperaid
Thanks for the video, buddy. Still, I would say that the highway is undergoing construction, and the #adt user directly opened it from the construction state without adding any construction-related tags. I agree that the trunk links are currently being used as a temporary deviation, but how will people who are new to the area know that the main highway is still under construction? Adding the appropriate construction tagging would have provided better clarity. Now, with the additional minor tagging, it seems more acceptable.
HellMap (2026-06-11 18:45:25+00:00): Hello,

Please do not add incorrect access values to OSM. These are for legal/permitted access. The only time it is legally `bicycle=no` is if there is a sign or traffic law that forbids it. OSM does not map subjective values like "safe" because everyone interprets them differently and you cannot determine this objectively and verifiably. Road properties are specified by classification, lanes, width, max speed, surface, etc.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability#Subjective_opinions

And please don't add horse=unknown - this value is similarly the same across the whole country and it's horse=yes unless otherwise specified. There is no point adding `unknown` unless you are trying to deliberately signal that this needs a survey to confirm the actual restriction, if any. And there are only a handful horse-related signs in the whole of Latvia, so it will almost never be applicable.
BartekChom (2026-06-13 21:58:08+00:00): Ojej, przepraszam, mam wrażenie, że edycja wymaga przemyślenia znaczników dostępu przy hotelu Gołębiewskiego, zwłaszcza dla ciągu pieszo-rowerowego.

Było `access=no` `bicycle=designated` `foot=designated` i wyświetlała się niebieska linia dla zamkniętej ścieżki. Dało mi się to we znaki, kiedy sam korzystałem z mapy, zresztą według normalnych zasad znaczniki sugerowały, że droga jest otwarta dla pieszych i rowerów, ale niczego innego. Dlatego dałem `access=no` `planned:bicycle=designated` `planned:foot=designated` zakładając, że to będzie zwykły publiczny ciąg pieszo-rowerowy, a na razie jest potrzebna szara linia zamkniętej ścieżki.

Wygląda, że teraz ustawiłeś `access=customers`, a moje `planned:bicycle=designated` `planned:foot=designated` zostały (np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1301577657), a np. dla https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1416115098 dodatkowo w edycji https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183914099 StreetComplete użytkownika Zwiadowca21 dodało (bez usuwania moich `planned:`) `bicycle=designated` `foot=designated`. W efekcie moje nieaktualne tagi razem z innymi dezorientują, a linia na mapie jest częściowo niebieska i częściowo czerwona.

Jeśli dobrze rozumiem, stawiałbym na `foot=customers` `bicycle=customers` jako ciąg pieszo-rowerowy dostępny tylko dla klientów, bez sugerowania, że klienci mogą jeździć samochodami, ale nie chcę się kłócić, a jak nie byłem w Pobierowie po otwarciu hotelu, to w ogóle nie znam prawdy. Czy ta podwójna ścieżka ma jednolite zasady na całej długości na terenie hotelu? Może możesz poprawić znaczniki, nie jestem pewien, w którą stronę, ale moje są praktycznie na pewno nieaktualne (a właściwie najwyraźniej od początku źle zgadłem), a jeśli ścieżka jest jednolita (w sumie tego nie wiem), to powinna mieć jednolite znaczniki.

Dla innych też interpretacja znaczników nie jest formalnie całkiem jasna, ale przynajmniej póki co nie komplikuję.
BartekChom (2026-06-22 15:40:02+00:00): Dla porządku piszę tutaj, że po osobistym obejrzeniu postawiłem na foot=permissive bicycle=permissive, zresztą w większości miejsc dałem highway=pedestrian (jeszcze jeżdżą ciężarówki, wygląda, jakby chodniki służyły też za drogi pożarowe), ale w jednym miejscu jest highway=path i czerwony kolor kontrastuje z niebieskim dla podwójnego designated (cóż).
wireguy (2026-06-16 17:37:58+00:00): Yomie's phone was missing a digit, corrected and added  fb/insta contact info.    Keep mapping!
joost schouppe (2026-07-01 08:06:07+00:00): De "traverser" is duidelijk geen "rails for full sized passenger or freight trains in the typical gauge of the country or state" en het lijkt me ook geen "railway track in private use that serve only freight transport to/from ports, industrial complexes or mining areas, and for connecting these to the public network"
Ik zou hier minstens voor usage iets "unieker" gebruiken, ik kwam bijvoorbeeld al usage=freight_crane tegen. Misschien kan je gewoon een nieuwe waarde uitvinden.
Taya_S (2026-06-11 11:31:59+00:00): All edits have been reverted in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183966602

Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20797
Taya_S (2026-06-11 11:31:53+00:00): The following changesets have been reverted: 

183966505, 183966447, 183966411, 183966393, 183966365, 183966335, 183966312, 183966290, 183966272, 183966218, 183966171, 183966132, 183966120, 183966068, 183965976, 183965950, 183965901, 183965879, 183965805, 183965773, 183965703, 183965674, 183965555, 183965474, 183965396, 183965372, 183965344, 183965316, 183965306, 183965278, 183965250, 183965222, 183965205, 183965132, 183965076, 183965053, 183965012, 183964998, 183964839, 183964827, 183964707, 183964498, 183964427, 183964411, 183964394, 183964364, 183964338, 183964329, 183964302, 183964250, 183964143, 183964082, 183964053, 183964039, 183963999, 183963588, 183963561, 183963543, 183963537, 183963517, 183963497
literan (2026-06-12 11:26:22+00:00): добрый день. ознакомьтесь, пожалуйста с https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification#Специальные_типы

highway=trunk_link это съезды на развязках дорог с той же важностью в дорожной сети, что и highway=trunk.

если съезд ведет на primary дорогу, он не обладает той же значимостью, что и trunk
Taya_S (2026-06-11 11:47:15+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183967248
Taya_S (2026-06-11 11:47:26+00:00): Blocked in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20798
ivanbranco (2026-06-17 17:08:05+00:00): ciao Luca, benvenuto su OSM.

questa chiusura é una situazione temporanea o permanente? se temporanea, quando tornerà alla normalità?
LucaFerrari (2026-06-17 17:12:09+00:00): Buonasera, questa situazione purtroppo sará permanete visto che stanno installando una sbarra su un pezzo di strada che é privata, e quindi il passaggio sará solo per i residenti.
Hendrik Helsper (2026-06-11 12:15:00+00:00): Begründung:

Die K70 fungiert hier als Umgehungsstraße für die Innenstadt von Simmern aus Richtung Laubach kommend zum Krankenhaus bzw. zur B50 Ri. Trier und aus Ri. Nannhausen/Gemünden kommend in Ri. Koblenz / Laubach. 
Vor dem Kreisel an der Ziefer-Spange ist die Anschlusst. "B50 West" nach rechts über die K70 ausgeschildert. Außerdem wurde  in der Koblenzer Str. / Hunsgasse auch eine 30er Zone eingerichtet.
dzamper (2026-06-12 06:51:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183648837
Sporo jeszcze do wycofania zostało.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-14 07:40:23+00:00): A znaczna część https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4277388 jest do skasowania

Pomoc mile widziana
MaliMrav (2026-06-12 09:48:15+00:00): Zdravo,

Molim te da proveriš naziv za ovaj nod:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13928730656

Pretpostavljam da treba da piše "Učionica", ne "Učionisa".
CRCulver (2026-06-12 09:59:38+00:00): I fixed this in changeset 184008811, but obviously this is a fix that you could have made yourself (you can see from the name=sr-Latn tag that the name= tag is a misspelling).
pyram (2026-06-24 11:54:49+00:00): Das ist nicht korrekt, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/999972327
(da es auch nur temporär ist, wird es nur nicht angezeigt. - außer hier: https://greymiche.lima-city.de/xmas/ )

Nebenbei: Ich werde auch das "Rock im Park-Gebäude" entfernen, da es kein Gebäude ist, doppelt und auch kein https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Devents_venue . Der originale node reicht da völlig aus: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3637320546/history/1 )
lankapuhelin (2026-06-15 17:24:27+00:00): Hei, ranta-aitat turistikohteena ei voi sisältää verkkosivuna majoitusliikkeen sivustoa, majoitusliikkeen merkintä tulisi tehdä erillisenä omine tietoineen
Hendrik Helsper (2026-06-11 13:07:01+00:00): Begründung:
Verkehrlich bedient die L222 nur die Orte Bergenhausen, Pleizenhausen, Rayerschied und Benzweiler. 
Wer von Simmern Ri. Kisselbach/Rhein fährt, nutzt die L220 (genauso in Gegenrichtung). Wer aus Ri. Laubach nach Rheinböllen fährt, nutzt die L223 auf ganzer Strecke. Wer von Simmern nach Rheinböllen fährt, wird entweder die B50 oder die K52/L223 nutzen. Beschildert sind dort auch nur die nächsten Ortschaften (Pleizenhausen etc.).
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-23 18:04:25+00:00): Stop. (Ban) Hammer Time!

SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186250305
BCNorwich (2026-06-13 05:48:54+00:00): You are again mapping highways on top of existing highways, which disrupts routing. Duplicated highway Way: 1528491928 is removed. Amend/correct existing features please.
tux67 (2026-06-12 08:48:39+00:00): Hi St Marco,

möchtest du hier sagen daß die gleiche Hausnummer an 2 verschiedenen Gebäuden steht? 
Von der Straße aus ist die Hausnummer nur am Gebäude direkt an der Straße zu erkennen.
2 identische Hausnummern wären sehr ungewöhnlich und werden bei OSM überlicherweise nicht vergeben.
Gruß
tux67
P.S.: Bitte um Kommentar hier im Changeset.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183971346
St Marco (2026-06-12 09:49:11+00:00): Hi tux67, 

ich gebe dir Recht, dass das erst mal kurios klingt. Ich wohne allerdings selbst in dem Hinterhaus im Innenhof und es hat ebenfalls die Hausnummer 8, genauso wie das Haus zur Straßenfront. Ich hatte hier einmal nachgeforscht, weil es auch bei der Postzustellung oft zu Verwechslungen kommt. Es liegt wohl daran, dass beide Gebäude auf dem selben Flurgrundstück stehen. Ich gebe bei meiner Anschrift daher oft den Zusatz "Hinterhaus" an.

LG St Marco
tux67 (2026-06-12 10:15:16+00:00): Was erhoffst du dir von der doppelten Erfassung? Wen dem Flurstück nur eine Adresse zugeordnet ist, sollte auch nur eine erfasst werden.
Für Navigation etc. ist das (gerade bei der geringen Distanz) kein Vorteil.
Habt ihr nochmal eine "8" am Hinterhaus?
St Marco (2026-06-12 10:24:09+00:00): Hi tux67,

ja, am Hinterhaus befindet sich ebenfalls die Hausnummer 8. Ich wohne selbst dort und die Anschrift wird auch offiziell mit der Hausnummer 8 geführt. Da es in der Vergangenheit häufiger zu Verwechslungen bei der Zustellung kam, hatte ich mich hierzu bereits informiert. Einen eigenen Hausnummernzusatz wie 8a gibt es nicht. Ich gebe bei meiner Anschrift daher häufig freiwillig den Zusatz "Hinterhaus" an.

Wenn die doppelte Erfassung in OSM dennoch nicht dem üblichen Vorgehen entspricht, bin ich für Hinweise offen, wie man die Situation korrekt abbildet.

Gruß
St Marco
tux67 (2026-06-12 10:38:47+00:00): Gute Frage - ich interviewe mal ein paar Kollegen oder schau im Forum .. den Fall hatte ich so noch nicht .. aber das wird wohl nicht der einzige sein ..
aixbrick (2026-06-12 11:19:37+00:00): Prinzipiell lässt OSM doppelte Adressen zu, es kann nur sein, dass dann Qualitätssicherungs-Tools einen "Fehler" melden (doppelete Adresse).
Ich finde es aber komisch, dass eine eigene Hausnummer für das Gebäude abgelehnt wird. In Wassenberg kann man die doch sogar online beantragen (oben rechts): https://service.wassenberg.de/detail/-/vr-bis-detail/dienstleistung/7352/show
Gerade für den Rettungsdienst wäre eine klare Hausnummerntrennung doch sinnvoll.
SekeRob (2026-06-17 14:26:24+00:00): Hi, che cosa i questo, un Bar?
GRZ
SekeRob
MappingMore (2026-06-13 17:26:18+00:00): Partially Revert of 183916804
Yuliya_Petrash (2026-06-15 07:32:54+00:00): Hello, MappingMore!
Thank you for your comment on my changeset!

Sincerely,
Yuliya
bxl-forever (2026-06-11 14:08:35+00:00): Hello,
Sorry but this is not correct.
This route relation is a main relation, it should *not* have a "via" key.
This key is only used to disambiguate route relations when a master relation contains several relations with the same from/to combination. In that case (and only in that case), it is possible to add "via" to the least important of them.
Your edit has been reverted.
Leo Slager (2026-06-11 22:16:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
felipeeugenio (2026-06-11 14:40:23+00:00): Hola Gustavo, porfa, si en estos malls, que son todas las direcciones iguales, ya hay tiendas con dirección, agregarlas porfa...acabo de hacer eso en el parque arauco y nueva las condes, con varias tiendas que tu agregaste...

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183972886
donux-nl (2026-06-18 07:24:11+00:00): Dag Emvee,
De situatie in dit deel is tijdelijk gewijzigd. Het zuidelijke fietspad van de Burg Brokxlaan is deels afgesloten en de zuidelijke weghelft is in gebruik als fietspad. Dit is zeker tot 4/6/2027 volgens https://bereikbaarheid.andes.nl/. 
Lijkt me wel de moeite om dit aan te passen, aangezien het voor een jaar is.
Mannivu (2026-06-13 16:27:59+00:00): Che bisogno c'era di cancellare i nodi già esistenti? Se si volevano separare civici e POI (cosa che, tra l'altro, non è né vietata né controversa) avresti dovuto comunque mantenere i nodi esistenti per il mantenimento della cronologia dei nodi.
canfe (2026-06-13 17:49:03+00:00): L'idea era proprio quella, non perdere nulla.
Non è che c'è un lag nell'aggiornamento?
Mannivu (2026-06-14 07:08:23+00:00): Come per gli altri gruppi di modifiche non credo. Se per te non è un problema, procedo ad annullare anche questo gruppo di modifiche, così puoi rifare l'operazione.
canfe (2026-06-14 09:45:22+00:00): Ti ringrazio per l'operazione.
Sto pensando di provare un metodo più "elegante".
Se hai voglia, possiamo poi fare una piccola prova assieme.
Mannivu (2026-06-14 13:46:06+00:00): Ok, ripristinato tutto in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184095217

Una sola domanda: come mai stai separando i civici dai negozi? Non mi pare sia una cosa errata averli sullo stesso nodo.
canfe (2026-06-15 04:42:43+00:00): Se li fondi compare l'icona del negozio di scarpe.
In zone molto commerciali scompaiono tutti praticamente.
L'ambulanza (NUE) usa le nostre mappe.
E' meglio trovare l'infartuato che le scarpe che desideriamo.

Comunque è previsto dalla wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses#Regole_specifiche_per_l'Italia

Ma soprattutto:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
Mannivu (2026-06-20 13:42:59+00:00): Mi trovi parzialmente d'accordo. Nel senso che è vero che è meglio trovare il paziente che il negozio, ma il civico è pur sempre un riferimento per il negozio. Piuttosto, andrebbero indicati i civici su nodi entrance=* e se anche c'è la duplicazione del civico perché è sia sull'ingresso che sul PDI del negozio non dovrebbe essere un problema.
kingkingHK (2026-06-12 02:51:57+00:00): The hatched area is so long, imo it is not a `service=emergency_access`. Just draw it as a single carriageway.

Your method might be more acceptable is the hatched area is short and the road is wide, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1527185813 (I just tagged the road without drawing the `=service`)
Kovoschiz (2026-06-12 09:03:19+00:00): Please don't directly delete, as it still represent a store space, and may contain addresses or other info. This makes tracking and updating them more difficult, adding next user's effort, and wasting previous user's work. Change it to `was:amenity=` / "Vacant".
muralito (2026-06-11 15:21:04+00:00): Hola. Nombre y poblacion se toma la del Censo 2023. Si tenes alguna otra fuente fiable tambien puede ser, pero hay que aclarar la fuente.
nacholettieri (2026-06-11 17:13:44+00:00): Hola, claro tiene sentido. Este es un barrio privado que en 2023 estaba a medio construir. Ahora está finalizado, tiene 192 casas con una ocupación superior al 95 %. En casi todas las casas viven familias, por eso estimo que mínimo somos 400 personas. Vivo acá, en el lote 47. No tengo enviarte evidencia de eso. Lo que sí te puedo decir que el nomrbe es en plural, tal cual lo dice el sitio web del barrio https://huertas.uy/
yelisey90 (2026-06-11 18:47:23+00:00): Hi! Please try not to add addresses to POI. (I know that CoMaps & OM do that for newly created POI, but for edited POI they only add it if you change the address.) In Georgia separate addresses are not assigned to offices, shops etc., so the address should only be present at a building or area, and ideally should be unique.
bxl-forever_repair (2026-06-16 13:12:21+00:00): Reverted, because this large edit which changes the entire reference and road category of a major road looks somewhat suspicious.
Should there be such a major error on the map—assuming that everyone else would have missed it during all those years—it should be better discussed beforehand + at least a link to a document where other mappers could verify that the claim is true.
We don’t believe that "Bing Maps aerial" is a suitable source to determine the reference tag or name of a road. Also, the two hamlets do not seem to exist, or if they do, the location of the nodes was incorrect.
Piskvor (2026-06-11 20:44:39+00:00): Hello, undeleted and changed to adit here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183989536

Note the layer=-4 and what it connects to - this is a connecting corridor between metro tunnels.

I have retagged to man_made=adit - you are correct that this is not a footway.
Thanks for making the map a bit more logical.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-11 15:14:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175051391
f_gonella (2026-06-11 15:40:27+00:00): Hi, you edited an item in Koblenz while mapping in Sophja. Please try to stick to a single region/area in future.
Happy mapping!
Fabio
mavl (2026-06-11 15:28:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183977054 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20801].
mavl (2026-06-11 15:28:11+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 183958299, 183958409, 183958483, 183958512, 183958554, 183958608, 183958641, 183958741, 183958800, 183958824, 183958939, 183959119, 183959179, 183959437, 183959594, 183959646, 183959786, 183959850, 183959896, 183960057, 183976792, 183976942.
Leo Slager (2026-06-11 22:18:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
yelisey90 (2026-06-11 18:02:34+00:00): Hi! Don't forget to remove old properties of Magniti that became Kalata, like email etc.
mueschel (2026-06-19 10:09:19+00:00): Hi,
is "cts" actually correct? This system name isn't used anywhere else up to now.
Jonaes (2026-06-20 10:38:38+00:00): Hi, 
I'd say so, yeah.
CTS - Contactless Train Stop is the current train protection system of the Glasgow Subway - see for example at the bottom of https://seinwezen.net/functievervullers/automatische-trein-beinvloeding/ATP-ATC%20examples/index.html
and the current tagging scheme (which is not good) requires to add a new key for each train protection system.

I did, however, forget to document it in the wiki; I’ll do that now.

Glasgow seems to be the only system to use that excact system under that name, although there are of course more other inductive tripcock systems around.
Taya_S (2026-06-16 07:10:46+00:00): Hi,

What exactly does this route represent? The shape doesn't really make much sense to me, and you've not added any details beyond `route=road + type=route`?  and this relation spans multiple different roads.

Here you also added the obviously incorrect name of 'qqqqqqqqqqq'. What are you trying to do?

Best regards,  
Taya Snijder
BerryTrails (2026-06-22 06:39:49+00:00): Hi Ctrl+shiftF5. On what basis’s have changed the classification the way is not used by the public which not an main highway it was leading to a formland tertiary is not at suitable here i will correct the here t


Thankyou
silversurfer83 (2026-06-14 16:28:05+00:00): Hi :)

die (ziemlich gute) App OsmAnd bietet uns (leider) immer das name=* Feld an, wenn wir in der App einen neuen POI erfassen und zur Datenbank hinzufügen wollen. Wir müssen jedoch beachten, dass es a) nur ein Angebot der App ist und wir uns b) an die Regeln im Wiki unter name=* halten sollten. Dort steht, dass der Name nur der Name ist und keine Beschreibung. Wenn ein POI, wie dieser Picknicktisch, also keinen echten Namen hat, dann lassen wir das Feld leer. 

Bei Fragen immer raus damit und weiter viel Spaß an der Karte

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183977599
Leo Slager (2026-06-11 22:19:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Paul K NL (2026-06-12 08:41:10+00:00): Dank je, ik zal het doornemen
Taya_S (2026-06-16 07:09:42+00:00): Hi,

What exactly does this route represent? The shape doesn't really make much sense to me, and you've not added any details beyond `route=road + type=route`? I'm also wondering why you added the name 'qqqqqq' here before deleting it?

Best regards,  
Taya Snijder
Davie946 (2026-06-13 10:45:07+00:00): Since changing the drive to private it seems to have completely disappeared. Obviously it does exist on the ground. I need possibly to change to access+residents. In fact residents do not generally use it either as they go in the back entrance. They do have that option though. If anyone sees this please advise. Not sure how to change this now
LordGarySugar (2026-06-13 18:04:39+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! I have re-added the highway=service tags that you removed; the correct way of representing a private driveway is highway=service + service=driveway + access=private. Typically, access=no is used when access is physically impossible for anyone (e.g. a damaged bridge) or legally prohibited (e.g. a dual carriageway where pedestrians are prohibited)

If you have any questions, feel free to ask
silversurfer83 (2026-06-14 16:01:04+00:00): Hi :)

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht.

Passt soweit. Falls du Details zur Formatierung von Telefonnummern bei OSM nachlesen möchtest kannst du das unter phone=* tun. Kann sein, dass wir eigentlich noch Leerzeichen einfügen, aber den Telefonen ist das ziemlich egal ;)

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183979382
grzegorz75jan (2026-06-11 19:45:03+00:00): Od kiedy w Radlnej są nazwy ulic a szczególnie tej jednej którą dodałaś czyli Ulica Radlna.
Dlaczego ta ulica (droga) jest oznaczona jako bród i to na całej długości. Jest tam jakiś ciek wodny ?

Są też inne błędy. W wolnej chwili to poprawię.

Ta edycja to z własnej woli czy w ramach jakichś zajęć okołoszkolnych ?