piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
felipeeugenio (2025-12-17 13:09:23+00:00): Hola. Eliminó una casa dentro del Club Pádel Jardín del Este. Ya no existe o fue un error?

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176024985
pudoeco (2025-12-17 14:14:13+00:00): Hola, buenos días. Efectivamente ya no existe. Mencionar también que el edificio que añadí ahí y en este mismo changeset corresponde a un elemento distinto y se construyó hace poco.

Saludos
felipeeugenio (2025-12-17 14:38:35+00:00): ok, no hay problema. Saludos
LordGarySugar (2025-12-17 23:16:25+00:00): what kind of 'edits'? It would be helpful if you could briefly summarise what you added or edited (or in this case deleted) to make it easier for other editors to understand your changes. Thanks.
kitsee (2025-12-17 23:29:24+00:00): I would like to second Mr LordGarySugar. These useless changeset comments must stop. Its gone on for far too long. You have made 4,364 changesets, 2922 of them have had either "edit" or "edits" as a changeset comment. Please start adding descriptive commends to make it clear what edits you are making.
Palina Markina (2025-12-19 08:44:24+00:00): gomedia91!
We noticed your recent edit where you deleted the 'highway=tertiary' tag  (way/24418053). Based on Mapbox-owned licensed street-level imagery from 11 Dec 2025 the road still appears to be accessible to motor vehicles.
If there have been recent developments, it would be really helpful to include a note in the changeset comment for future reference.
Best regards, Palina Markina
LordGarySugar (2025-12-21 23:28:39+00:00): I've restored the tertiary road that appears to have been incorrectly deleted
rskedgell (2025-12-16 23:54:43+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately, deleting the turn restriction relations has the effect that they no longer apply to any transport mode, rather than having an exception for buses and taxis. Instead of deleting them, you could have changed the tag except=bus to except=bus;taxi

Do you know when Westminster City Council made the traffic order(s) changing these restricted turns from bus only to bus and taxi?
rskedgell (2025-12-23 17:49:48+00:00): Hi, as you didn't respond to my question, I took a little look at the signed restrictions around the junction of Terminus Place and Buckingham Palace Road. I've also submitted images to Mapillary.

1) From Buckingham Palace Road southbound, there is a signed "no left turn, except buses" restriction. Taxis are not allowed.

2) There is no sign prohibiting vehicles other than buses and taxis on the section of Terminus Place, therefore the restriction you added was fictitious.

3) From Buckingham Palace Road northbound (a physically separated carriageway with a "no entry except buses" sign) and a signed "no left turn, except buses" restriction. Taxis are not allowed in either case.

Fiction reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176319074
rskedgell (2025-12-23 17:50:33+00:00): * no *right* turn in #3 above
joost schouppe (2026-01-06 10:22:46+00:00): Bij dit soort sportsites hoort volgens mij een leisure=sports_centre op het hele gebied, dat dan ook de naam van de sportclub draagt. Ik heb het zo aangepast: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176895800
MrMoehritz (2025-12-31 11:32:55+00:00): Hi SchrdngrsZombie,

du hast review_requested=yes gesagt. Sieht gut aus. Soll man sich etwas bestimmtes ansehen?

Wo genau kommt denn die Einteilung der Etappen her? Die enden ja teilweise im Wald...

Guten rutsch

Mo
SchrdngrsZombie (2025-12-31 12:43:59+00:00): Hi Mo,

das war eine meiner ersten größeren Änderungen, deswegen wollte ich einfach, dass nochmal jemand drüber schaut, ob das so plausibel ist :)
Die Etappen kommen von https://burgensteig-bergstrasse.de/burgensteig/ und scheint auch mit der auf https://www.bergstrasse-odenwald.de/detail/id=5f1540cf0e3c1c0fedd15837 übereinzustimmen. 
Soweit ich das auf https://www.odenwaldklub.de/arbeitskreise/arbeitskreis-wegebezeichnung/ (Abschnitt 2) verstehe, ist der "Tourismus Service Bergstrasse e.V.", der die erste angegebene Seite betreibt auch tatsächlich verantwortlich für die Wegführung.

Das die Etappen teilweise seltsam enden ist mir auch aufgefallen (und da habe ich mich dann beim Laufen auch nicht dran gehalten...). Aber wenn wir hier eine irgendwie geartete "offizielle" Einteilung haben sollten wir die auch so übernehmen, oder?

Ebenfalls einen guten Rutsch!
MrMoehritz (2025-12-31 13:03:55+00:00): ja, wenn das die offiziellen Etappenstrecken sind ist das so super! Die Relation wird auch hier schön angezeigt und als fehlerfrei analysiert: https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=117593 (kanntest du wahrscheinlich schon...)
NeisBot (2025-12-17 05:42:56+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 16 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/750955890 v2 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/354862084 v6 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/750955891 v2 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176025578
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-18 09:20:48+00:00): Fixed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176081425
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-18 09:22:33+00:00): And also fixed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176085011
Frans S (2025-12-17 16:45:34+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping>
Please do not connect nodes of buildings to other objects or buildings. If a previous mapper connected them, please correct them.
And, square each rectangular building with the Q key,
Best regards
kOSMofant (2025-12-17 18:35:59+00:00): Thanks for your comment. Think I have  decoupled all of them now, and be more aware for future edits
felipeeugenio (2025-12-17 13:03:57+00:00): Hola. ¿Qué hay ahí realmente? porque no se ve un parque propiamente tal.
gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176025811
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-12-16 22:37:51+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 176023596.
cubbe8 (2025-12-17 01:54:56+00:00): please survey before editing, this is a raised crossing that is marked funny
rskedgell (2025-12-16 23:37:41+00:00): I see you've added separate sidewalks to a few streets in this area, but haven't changed the tagging on the parent street from sidewalk=both to sidewalk:both=separate

It's also a little unhelpful that footway=crossing ways extend to the intersection of the footway=sidewalk ways, rather than just to the kerb. As a result of this, when people survey this area using tools like StreetComplete, they will not be prompted to supply all the information about kerb height and tactile paving which could otherwise have been collected. Mapping pedestrian infrastructure while limiting the scope to record accessibility features does somewhat reduce its value for pedestrian, wheelchair and visually impaired routing.

As this appears to be an anonymous MapRoulette activity, I have no idea what the project instructions are, although there should be a link in the changeset tags.
VLD282 (2025-12-22 19:16:59+00:00): Hello rskedgell, thank you for bringing these to our attention. While reviewing this changeset, we noticed that separate sidewalks were added along residential roads which, to our understanding, is not preferable to the London mapping community. I’ve gone through to try and adjust these edits to align with  these practices, thanks again for pointing these out. 

And I see what you mean regarding kerb tagging, thanks for the suggestion! As far as the project link goes, we do include #'s for the ones our changeset is focused on in the comment, but heres a link too that will show the project instructions! https://maproulette.org/browse/projects/59040.
rempshaener (2025-12-17 21:09:50+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe keine Anmerkung, das sieht gut aus.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
Leo Slager (2025-12-17 19:23:31+00:00): Die halte staat niet in de dienstregeling.
De halte is niet bekend in het NDOV-haltebestand.
De halte is niet zichtbaar op recente luchtfoto.
War is de bron voor deze wijziging ?
A-dg6 (2025-12-17 19:48:44+00:00): De halte staat er, ik ben er langs gefietst, en op de haltepaal staat de lijn 193 vermeld.
Leo Slager (2025-12-18 00:44:52+00:00): Oké, ik zal de halte toevoegen aan lijn 193.
ExoMal (2025-12-17 10:09:11+00:00): Hiya mate, are you sure this is a path? The imagery looks to me like this has a bridge leading to the house, and (while not a valid source for adding data) local Street View shows the path to be a pair of tracks rather than a singular path.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176026327
Rupert Swarbrick (2025-12-18 08:10:39+00:00): I'm not sure at all: the change I made was just to connect up the two paths (and I assumed that I couldn't see things properly from the aerial photo).

The N/S path has an associated name, so I thought that it might exist. I also notice that there's something that looks like a path W of the hedge at the S end (and, in fact, you can see it in StreetView).

I think the answer is probably that "The Run" is actually the track from the NW and the stuff north of the intersection doesn't exist at all.

I'll tweak it accordingly.
ExoMal (2025-12-19 12:26:25+00:00): Thanks, I'll leave myself a private note to survey this in person at some point to determine this for sure.
rempshaener (2025-12-17 21:13:58+00:00): Hallo,
auch diese Bearbeitung habe ich mir angeschaut.
Ich vermute, es handelt sich um eine Saugstelle, an der per Saugleitung und Saugkorb Wasser entnommen wird?
Dann wäre das

emergency=suction_point
water_source=pond

Bei Fragen bitte melden.

Viele Grüße
gscscnd (2025-12-23 20:16:23+00:00): PL:zone20 byłoby dla znaku B-43; jeśli tutaj jest D-40, to raczej PL:living_street.
Lola Fox (2026-01-07 17:14:35+00:00): Credo che la galleria Giorgio Bombi sia percorribile dalle biciclette come sembra essere indicato qua https://www.google.it/maps/@45.9449919,13.6316625,3a,15y,308.21h,94.74t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s5mLFAO1QUjSvlZ_DZ3_Rqg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D-4.742251270395357%26panoid%3D5mLFAO1QUjSvlZ_DZ3_Rqg%26yaw%3D308.21104270769735!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MTIwOS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
cquest (2025-12-17 08:02:54+00:00): Bonjour,

Attention sur l'ajout des numéros de téléphone qui créent des doublons phone=* + contact:phone=*

J'ai corrigé.
Futur3r (2025-12-19 01:47:31+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci de mettre des commentaires plus descriptifs sur tes changesets. Comme "Mise à jour de la voirie", "correction de POI de commerces", etc ...

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques
Futur3r (2025-12-19 01:50:21+00:00): Également c'est très important de rajouter les sources de tes modifications ! comme "survey", "knowledge", "BD Ortho IGN", etc...
Ça nous indique où tu as eu l'information de tes modifications.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-27 22:54:15+00:00): Hello!

You used
tracktype=grade 3
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446476978/history

Have you maybe meant
tracktype=grade3
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
statelyelms (2026-04-16 15:28:11+00:00): Je m'excuse, mais j'ai corrigé votre edit et j'ai pensé que tu aimerais le savoir. L'ajoute des noms français est toujours apprécié (évidemment!), mais tu as aussi supplanté les noms communs et l'opérateur existant d'un dépôt municipale de Frédéricton et une rue de nation Sitansisk avec les versions françaises, qui contrairement aux originaux, ne représentent pas la vérité locale – anglophone avec une minorité francophone significative.

(Aussi, noter en passant que la traduction du nom de la rue était incorrect parce que les noms propres ne sont pas traduisibles directement ('Bear' est un nom propre, même si c'était nommé pour une bête et devriez rester le même).)

Je pense que tu es aussi l'origine d'autres erreurs avec les noms communs en français des rues en ville que j'ai corrigé au passé. Donc, n'oubliez pas d'être prudent quand tu change d'information existante, spécialement dans les endroits que tu ne connais pas directement (je crois que tu n'es pas d'ici, de ton histoire?). La plupart du temps, c'est meilleur le laisser l'information comme c'était et en ajouter seulement – comme en ajout les name:fr=_______ et non en changent les name=_______.

Merci! (et merci d'avoir lu ce message, mon français n'est pas parfait)
Dindia (2025-12-23 19:13:22+00:00): The use of road 10 it allowed only a few days in a year, at very specific hours. You change the permission from PRIVATE to YES.
This is incorrect. Please revert the change.
Taya_S (2025-12-17 08:09:17+00:00): Reverted deletions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176037408
Taya_S (2025-12-17 08:07:23+00:00): Reverted deletions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176037355
HashFerret (2025-12-19 19:55:30+00:00): Hi Ray, looks like this and the other two cameras you added are likely test nodes and aren't physically present? Could you confirm and delete them? Thanks for keeping an eye out for ALPRs!
dknelson9876 (2025-12-23 03:04:59+00:00): Hi cas79, welcome to OSM and mapping in Utah! We're glad to have you. In this changeset, you left the buildings not quite attached, but in the imagery it looks to me like the buildings are connected. If the buildings are physically connected on the ground, they should be connected (glued) together in OSM.

Also please note that in OSM we avoid abbreviations, so where you used addr:street="N Main St." here, it should actually be addr:street="North Main Street". Please make these corrections, or just ask and I'm happy to make them too. Feel free to ask any other questions you have!
Taya_S (2025-12-17 08:07:24+00:00): Reverted deletions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176037355
NeisBot (2025-12-17 05:43:18+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/853083911 v6 | 4 crossings

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/10292451728 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176028570
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-17 05:54:50+00:00): In this case, it seems the reported issues are false positives. The geometries were not changed in a way that would introduce crossings, and the tagging adjustments did not create any new conflicts. I have checked the mentioned elements and can confirm that the current configuration is valid.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks again for your map edits.

Regards,
Pascal
Jacksonville (2025-12-21 01:14:28+00:00): The entirety of this area isn't a military area. Just because it's called "Kharian Cantonment" doesn't mean that every part of it is military. That only applies to actual military bases.
Jacksonville (2025-12-21 01:35:08+00:00): I've corrected the size of it.
Jacksonville (2025-12-21 01:35:19+00:00): The rest I've changed them to residential areas.
Taya_S (2025-12-17 08:08:20+00:00): Hello, I have deleted this buiding, as it does not exist on the ground. Please make sure that your additions match satellite imagery

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176037383
JoeG (2025-12-31 00:19:33+00:00): Hi! The advice I've previously received is that it's generally no advisable to replace this large a wooded area with individual trees, but I personally don't have a strong opinion. I do intend to revert the deletion of fences and bollards in this one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176029093
nevw (2025-12-17 04:43:46+00:00): Hi, you have placed two defibrillators in the same spot in the middle of the road. Shall I delete both and you can place one at the place where it actually lives.
nevw (2025-12-17 04:51:29+00:00): I think this happens a lot when trying to add defibrillators as there appears to be no warning from the app if you place a duplicate accidentally and most of the maps that don’t actually render the defibrillators so the person trying to map them doesn’t get sufficient feedback that they have added one correctly.
MetroBot (2025-12-17 02:22:56+00:00): 通常在一个route=subway中只包含一个方向，两个方向的route放在同一个type=route_master中

参考
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Metro_Mapping#Route_Relations

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/China/Transport/Urban_Rail_Transit#%E7%AB%99%E7%82%B9%E5%85%B3%E7%B3%BB%E5%92%8C%E7%BA%BF%E8%B7%AF%E5%85%B3%E7%B3%BB
Rukkhadevata (2025-12-17 02:26:26+00:00): 这个关系表示的是线路的物理设施，没有方向，跟列车的运行路线不同（尽管在地铁中两者经常重合）
MetroBot (2025-12-17 02:37:39+00:00): 我理解你的意思，但和现有的其他线路规范不同。下面是成都地铁30号线和成都地铁9号线（现有规范）的区别。

成都地铁9号线（现有规范）
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13088859

成都地铁30号线
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13367011
MetroBot (2025-12-17 02:39:58+00:00): 另外这是地铁相关的检查工具。你可以参考
https://maps.vk.com/osm/tools/subways/latest/china.html
Rukkhadevata (2025-12-17 13:05:58+00:00): 已修复 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13367011/history/9
NeisBot (2025-12-17 05:51:56+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Fan store"

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisRevert (2025-12-17 06:08:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/176034221
where the comment is: "Remove unclear map edits"
NeisRevert (2025-12-17 06:08:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/176034232
where the comment is: "Remove unclear map edits"
JoeG (2025-12-31 00:17:34+00:00): Hi! This one has 9 deleted footway=sidewalk
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176029380
JoeG (2025-12-31 00:16:15+00:00): Hi! This one has 2 deleted footway=sidewalk
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176029663
Taya_S (2026-01-27 08:06:14+00:00): This edit is in india. Why did you add an address from Bangladesh? And why did you change it to locality?
LordGarySugar (2025-12-18 19:51:04+00:00): Hi, if you have footways overlapping buildings, it would be best to correct the buildings by moving them instead of adding layer=1 / -1. Happy mapping :)
Dean Leichtle (2025-12-18 23:10:20+00:00): Ofc and almost everytime I get to complete my work correctly. But since I have the Goal to Mark all of the Streets and I do a lot of them in the past I do sometimes oversee this mistakes. Happy Mapping :)
FajrAl (2025-12-17 12:00:06+00:00): Kalau lahan, tidak perlu tag building=*
QuiLe (2025-12-17 04:54:17+00:00): Thank you for your contribution!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176032036
Syl (2025-12-17 10:23:59+00:00): Hello, please check your changes with the aerial images. You have added a road on grass and on parking spaces.
Syl (2025-12-23 16:33:05+00:00): In the absence of a response I finally fixed it.

In your wiki page it says "responding within 24 hours is treated as a top priority", what happened?
RahilPasha (2025-12-24 05:57:55+00:00): I apologize for not addressing the issue earlier, as I was on leave due to health reasons. Going forward, I will ensure the issue is resolved on time.
the_third_man (2025-12-17 08:44:33+00:00): If the AED is set to "indoor=no", why was it located inside the building?

It would be better to locate it on the correct outside of the building; then you wouldn't have to walk around the building looking for it. This would also save time.

Dear "defibrillator card app" operators, please observe the OTG rule. With such sensitive data—you want to save lives, after all—you should put in a little more effort, if you understand what I mean.

And what does "level=2" mean in this context?

Best regards
chnuessli (2025-12-17 09:47:51+00:00): I called and asked about it. The defibrillator is located on the second floor of the building in one of the wards. So the location is correct. Why indoor=no was suddenly set there is beyond my knowledge. That also answers your question about the level.

But I would like to address one more point regarding putting in more effort. What specific suggestions for improvement do you have? We are open to any feedback and will try to implement it if possible.
the_third_man (2025-12-17 12:00:47+00:00): First improvement suggestion: take the OTG rule into account. Don't blindly transfer everything entered into the app.
chnuessli (2025-12-17 12:07:01+00:00): This entry seems reasonable to me. We take the focus on defis, not the world world around it, a missing container wouldn't be in our focus and we trust local osm communities/mappers to improve the map as well. The normal app/website user isn't an OSM user.
So how should we improv the OTG Rule? I quote "OSM data should, as far as is reasonably possible, be verifiable. The principle applies to tags and other aspects of data representation and essentially means another mapper should be able to come to the same place and collect the same data ("verify" the data you have entered). This principle excludes hypothetical or opinionated data like personal ratings."

It seems that this entry can be proved on point. 
How would you do it, if you were us?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-17 06:07:38+00:00): dzwoniłem, telefon działa
YomanNH (2025-12-18 06:15:21+00:00): Hej, w numerach telefonów powinien być również numer kierunkowy kraju.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:phone?uselang=pl
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-26 08:59:48+00:00): może być, choć sensu dużego w dodawaniu nie widzę
YomanNH (2026-06-26 13:47:36+00:00): Dokumentacja tego wymaga, więc warto trzymać się standardów.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-26 14:39:42+00:00): zaleca, nie wymaga: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone
literan (2025-12-17 19:11:36+00:00): почему вы пишете в описании правки "Добавлена адресация", а на самом деле адресацию удаляете?
Yurii_l (2025-12-18 09:29:45+00:00): Да, в описании ошибся.
Теги адреса с точки убрал чтобы не было двойной адресации (на здании она уже есть)
literan (2025-12-18 18:58:47+00:00): кто-то их расставляет, а вы их убираете, значит ))

в приложении EveryDoor например, отдельные поля посвящены автоматическому копированию адреса со здания на POI внутри его
citrula (2025-12-18 00:26:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM. The traffic signal there is correct - if you want to add an ALPR, please move it to the phyiscal location and map the direction. Let me know if you need help doing this!

Happy mapping
Patr1k_P (2025-12-17 10:13:13+00:00): zdar, podla mna to bolo spravene dobre, mal si len skratit plot, zbytocne si to skomplikoval s polygonom a teraz to dobre nie je..ostatne zmeny sa zdaju ok