piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-15 18:20:54+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13145062303

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
zabop (2025-09-15 19:53:20+00:00): Please add meaningful changeset comments. "в" is not meaningful.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-15 18:30:54+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10749280774

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-15 18:30:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13145062303

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
enristuda007 (2025-10-01 09:48:16+00:00): Am 30.9.25 wollte ich über den Dürstelgrat zum Chilchzimmersattel, konnte die Abzweigung aber nicht finden. In Swisstopo gibt es den Pfad nicht ! Der ganze Grat ist als Naturschutzzone deklariert. Müsste man nun diesen Pfad eliminieren ?
Piagno (2025-10-01 10:23:42+00:00): Hallo enristuda
Könntest du echt die way Id schreiben, ich bin mir nicht sicher, welchen Weg du meinst
Piagno (2025-10-01 10:24:46+00:00): meinst du den Pfad https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467722434 und du hattest Probleme von Langenbruck her kommend?
enristuda007 (2025-10-03 08:45:43+00:00): Ja !
Piagno (2025-10-03 12:47:30+00:00): Der Start für den Pfad ist recht unscheinbar und überwachsen. So wie er aktuell eingetragen ist, bin ich auch entlang gegangen. Sobald das anfängliche Dickicht passiert ist, ist der Pfad auch ganz normal vorhanden.
Piagno (2025-10-03 12:52:37+00:00): Ich habe mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172790084 den Pfad ein bisschen genauer eingetragen.
Bezüglich der Naturschutzzone weiss ich nicht genauer bescheid.
WWMapper101 (2025-09-17 12:33:27+00:00): Unsure of this name. The more accurate Swedish name would be ”Huvudstadsregionen”. Do you have any official Swedish sources with this name?
_Madfly (2025-10-01 14:33:22+00:00): Hi, it is just the name of the Swedish wikipedia article. I'm not sure how official it is.

https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huvudstadsregionen_(Danmark)
eggie (2025-09-15 18:51:17+00:00): Dag  bu11frog,

De adresnodes heb ik ook verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
aTarom (2025-09-16 07:51:11+00:00): Hello, I have no knowledge of the digital currency world. Could you tell me if the tag "payment:liquid" is correct and not meant to be "payment:cash"?
Cheers
Rockedf (2025-09-16 11:50:26+00:00): Hello, on #btcmap we use that tag to indicate that this payment method is used in businesses. It’s uncommon, but it is used. Here’s a brief explanation of what Liquid is in Bitcoin; I hope it helps. If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me.

"Bitcoin Liquid is a federated sidechain built on top of Bitcoin that enables faster, confidential, and lower‑fee transactions for exchanges, traders, and institutions. It also supports the issuance of digital assets and tokenized securities, allowing users to move value securely between the main Bitcoin blockchain and the Liquid network"
trigpoint (2025-11-22 18:35:50+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175000695
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-09-22 23:05:18+00:00): Hello, why did you change 1st Street from Stewart to Ogden to tertiary?
bryceco (2025-09-15 21:45:39+00:00): Congratulations! Nice job!
rempshaener (2025-09-17 16:53:00+00:00): Hallo,
Farbangaben in OSM erfolgen in englischer Schreibweise, also "red" statt "ROT".
Viele Grüße
StC (2025-09-23 09:31:14+00:00): Hi,

this changeset has broken the continuity of a hiking route that passes there. I'll take care of the fix.
Snusmumriken (2025-09-23 09:41:53+00:00): Sorry about that. Could you give more details so that I could understand what caused the problem?
StC (2025-09-23 09:49:27+00:00): As far as I remember, it was a way that went beyond the node where it connects to the next way in the relation. It was a pedestrian crossing, I believe
divulmappeur (2026-01-11 12:04:10+00:00): Hi,
this changeset introduce wrong geometry about service road inside Clinique Lenval, I have fixed it : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177093313
trial (2025-09-16 08:11:17+00:00): Salut,
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/57731064#map=17/47.786708/-3.269167&layers=N Pierre Le Touzé, non ?
Un indice : https://www.facebook.com/groups/761825807184562/posts/9193704103996648/
trial (2025-09-16 08:14:13+00:00): Et Pâris, par Paris, je t'offre son wikidata :
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3159824
gendy54 (2025-09-16 08:28:03+00:00): C'est corrigé. Mais tu aurais pu le faire ;)
trial (2025-09-16 11:08:50+00:00): Non et tu sais pourquoi ;-)
StreetSurveyor (2025-10-27 00:22:04+00:00): Hi there! Belvidere Place should be listed as a pedestrian street — it’s shown in the city’s GIS map, and some properties even use it as an alternate address.
Michael N (2025-10-27 02:35:56+00:00): Hi there, Could you explain why you think those are the criteria for highway=pedestrian? The wiki says "Generally, mappers use pedestrian tag only on wider streets which might accommodate motor vehicles." which Belvidere Place is not.
StreetSurveyor (2025-10-27 02:54:30+00:00): I understand your point about the wiki guidance and the word “generally.” I read that as allowing some flexibility for cases like this — where it’s not wide enough for vehicles but is still treated by the city as a public street. I leaned toward pedestrian since it’s mapped and addressed like a public street, which aligns with how pedestrian streets are typically designated in the city and fits local mapping practice.
StreetSurveyor (2025-10-27 03:17:27+00:00): I think one key piece was missed in your reply. The wiki itself says:

“The scope of this tag may overlap with highway=footway, which is generally used for narrower, often unnamed, pedestrian pathways and sidewalks. The distinction between the two may be region-specific.”

That line explicitly allows for regional/contextual flexibility. In this case the city’s GIS treats the way as a street and properties use it as an address, so it behaves like a named public street rather than an unnamed path.
Michael N (2025-10-27 03:17:40+00:00): Even then, are you sure it's "treated by the city as a public street"? On https://www.axisgis.com/CambridgeMA/?CamaIdName=[CamaFullNumber]&CamaIdValue=120-86 shows it as within private property. It has a name, but so does Cottage Row. It's in light gray, but so are private driveways. There's a gate (usually open) and an ambiguously placed "no trespassing" sign.

(I don't really think how the city treats it is the right question, but if it's an established "local mapping practice", then I guess this isn't the place for me to debate it.)
Michael N (2025-10-27 03:20:09+00:00): "it behaves like a named public street rather than an unnamed path." To be clear I never disputed whether it's named (it is).
Michael N (2025-10-27 03:22:15+00:00): I get your point about the wiki leaving it open to flexibility. I happen to lean in the opposite direction from you regarding what to do with that flexibility :) but I won't argue this to death. Maybe if I have free time I'll find the local forum/listserv or whatever.
StreetSurveyor (2025-10-27 03:29:27+00:00): Thanks for the clarification. Just to be clear, when I said “treated as a public street,” I wasn’t referring to ownership — only that it’s listed in the city’s GIS as a named street and used for addresses. I understand your interpretation and appreciate the thoughtful discussion.
M!dgard (2025-09-18 19:22:26+00:00): Je bent note="afgezet door overstroming" vergeten weghalen / aanpassen
kabelhaai (2025-09-18 20:03:15+00:00): oke aangepast
dypa (2025-10-13 12:19:09+00:00): При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra

Пожалуйста при внесении следующих правок используйте теги (Размеченный (нерегулируемый) пешеходный переход)
crossing=uncontrolled
crossing:markings=zebra

Заранее спасибо!
b-jazz (2025-09-16 15:47:40+00:00): When there is no clear delineation between what is rough and non-rough, there really is no need to draw in the rough. By this, I mean, I couldn't see any different between the area inside the rough vs. outside the rough. There were no distinct mower lines or other physical boundary, so it's just an arbitrary area that probably shouldn't be mapped.
eggie (2025-09-15 20:54:03+00:00): Commentaar moet zijn leisure=outdoor_seating verwijderd uit tuin.
Baittar (2025-09-16 09:14:19+00:00): To nie jest living_street. Nie jest to ulica tylko ścieżka rowerowa zamknięta dla ruchu samochodowego. Podlega pod kategorię cycleway
Yog Sot (2025-09-16 19:37:55+00:00): na wczęnsiejszym odcinku jest strefa zamieszkania, to tu też jest. Przypominam znak strefy oznacza obszar, kwestie poruszania się pieszo w strefie po drodze dla rowerów wyjaśnię później. 

Proponuję też byś nie był taki wyrywny ze zmianami wobec faktu, że masz dalece niższe doświadczenie i to ty w przypadku wątpliwości powinieneś odczekać na odpowiedz
db-ak (2025-09-17 13:33:32+00:00): Baittar, to na pewno nie jest droga rowerowa jak tagowałeś. Stoją znaki zakazu ruchu z dopem rowerowym. W terenie znak strefy zamieszkania zauważyłem jedynie od strony wschodniej, nie wiem czy jest od zachodniej? I tak jak można mieć wątpliwości w tagowaniu, to na pewno nie jest do dedykowana droga rowerowa
Yog Sot (2025-09-17 20:22:37+00:00): czyli ostatecznie, to nie ddr jak w mediach szumnie ogłaszali i się buntowali, tylko po prostu droga nie dla aut. 
No bardzo sprytne wybrnięcie z problemu czarnego PR rowerowego przez autowy hejt.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-09-16 13:59:57+00:00): Hi! Can you explain the changeset comment? Comments should be explanatory and summarize what work was done. Thanks!
gpetz (2025-09-16 14:20:30+00:00): Hi, the posted speed limit on this road is 70km/h.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-09-16 14:44:05+00:00): OK thanks!
notmyproblem1 (2025-09-20 08:39:58+00:00): Salut !Pour les numéros civils, tu peux faire comme pour les quartiers Gobetti 3 et 5, en les séparant. Et puis, tu peux ajouter plusieurs nœuds avec les adresses, d'accord ? Merci !

merci, buon mapping / bon mapping
notmyproblem1 (2025-09-20 08:44:08+00:00): 1 node = 4 numeros civils 😕😕❌
4 node = 4 numeros civils 😁😁✅
infeeeee (2025-09-17 10:45:27+00:00): Szia!

Facebook oldalak címét nem kell a website mezőben megismételni elég contact:facebook-ban 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:facebook

És kicsit szebben néz ki, ha csak az oldal id-ját írod be, ebben az esetben ezt: 100041814593199 Ezt már az alapértelmezett megjelenítő is kezeli.

További jó térképezést!
infeeeee (2025-09-19 10:23:17+00:00): Javítottam: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172154171
NeisBot (2025-09-15 21:09:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-09-26 13:57:22+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/172487416
user_5359 (2025-09-16 16:10:02+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1430079699. What is the mean of the tags
ADDDATE = Wed, 10 Sep 2025 20:38:17 GMT
ASSETID = ST50382
FCODE = RRRD
FDMID = 700500382
FROM_LEFT = 2
FROM_RIGHT = 1
FULL_NAME = DAPHNE WAY
GSA_LEFT = PORTERS LAKE
GSA_RIGHT = PORTERS LAKE
MODDATE = Fri, 12 Sep 2025 16:27:27 GMT
MUN_CODE = HRM
OBJECTID = 3
PAR_LEFT = EL
PAR_RIGHT = OR
ROUTE_ID = 6939
STR_CODE_L = 67196
STR_CODE_R = 67196
STR_NAME = DAPHNE
STR_TYPE = WAY
TO_LEFT = 20
TO_RIGHT = 19
TO_STR = RAHIMIAN WAY
? (no other OSM key exists)
Szymson (2025-09-16 15:11:40+00:00): Po co robisz takie łagodne łuki? Nawigacja tego nie wykryje jako skręt. Poza tym ortofotomapa nie jest zaktualizowana na dzień 13.09.2025 (dzień wprowadzenia nowej organizacji ruchu) więc nie ma mowy o rzetelnym wykorzystaniu tej warstwy podkładu. Do wycofania.
Szymson (2025-09-16 15:11:31+00:00): Po co robisz takie łagodne łuki? Nawigacja tego nie wykryje jako skręt. Poza tym ortofotomapa nie jest zaktualizowana na dzień 13.09.2025 (dzień wprowadzenia nowej organizacji ruchu) więc nie ma mowy o rzetelnym wykorzystaniu tej warstwy podkładu. Do wycofania.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-10-07 06:19:06+00:00): Hi Sandalss, 
are you sure that Relation: Dama wa at Ta'ieen Province (19570210) should have two outer members? Previous version where these areas were under one larger seems more accurate. Any source that confirms this new state?
Sandalss (2025-10-07 17:34:28+00:00): Hi Aleksander,

I was using the province boundaries of Qurayyat from the Muscat GIS map layer and the ArcGIS boundaries layer that contained the other governorates provinces boundaries. The problem is the Dama wa at Ta'ieen Province overlapped the Qurayyat Province. I merged them by deleting the Dama wa at Ta'ieen overlapping parts which resulted in it having an oddly shaped exclave with Wadi bani Khalid Province. I'm not sure if what I did was the best solution so please let me know if there's a better solution to this.
DaveF (2025-09-24 21:43:36+00:00): That's a big roundabout
SOSOwner (2025-09-15 21:29:00+00:00): Bus route 70 itself also needs correcting as it no longer operates east of Braintree East Tesco. https://bustimes.org/services/70-marks-farm-tesco-chelmsford-bus-stn
Gregory Peony (2025-09-17 04:03:51+00:00): Hi, The vast majority of footprints represent buildings. Some footprints could be slightly shorter. Use the shadow to inform the size and shape of footprints you map. --- The arrow-head footprint is inaccurate, becasue you traced the roof instead of using it to inform you mapping of the footprint. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling#Typical_errors_in_the_interpretation_of_roof_geometry_from_aerial_images --- Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171986971
rskedgell (2025-09-16 07:16:56+00:00): Thanks for resolving my note so quickly!

I've replaced the maxweight:hgv tag with maxweightrating:hgv which corresponds to that sign. If it had been a weak bridge sign, it would have been either maxweightrating (modern sign) or maxweight (pre-1994 sign).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171997927
Ydel (2025-09-15 22:00:46+00:00): Added substation from survey*
ColbyTheWorldTraveler (2026-02-24 20:10:45+00:00): Looks good! Good job!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171988044
totera (2025-09-23 20:17:09+00:00): Ciao Max, le strade che entrano ed escono da un parcheggio sono highway=service ma non service=parking_aisle.
Se ci sono più corsie si mette service=parking_aisle per le corsie usate soltanto per parcheggiare e non per attraversare il parcheggio.
fortera_au (2025-09-15 23:37:14+00:00): Shouldn't this be disused:amenity=post_office instead of amenity=disused:post_office?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171988421
SekeRob (2025-09-16 14:49:31+00:00): Ciao, felice di vedere un nuovo mappatore nell'area di Chieti/Pescara. Ho dovuto annullare alcune modifiche che hai fatto, ma soprattutto è necessario prestare attenzione ai nomi delle strade che inserisci negli indirizzi. Devono corrispondere al nome di una strada nel vicinato immediato. In questo caso, hai inserito alcune con addr:street=Lenzetta https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13146083182 ma non c'è nessuna strada con quel nome nella zona. Frontalmente è chiamato Fosso dei Lupi, che hai sostituito con Via San Pietro. C'è un'altra strada con Fosso dei Lupi e ricordo di aver visto quel segnale all'angolo più vicino a Filetto, ma non ho trovato segnali per quella che era Via San Pietro.

Comunque, non indichi la fonte se non riferendoti all'immagine aerea di Bing. Spero che tu non abbia utilizzato il sito web ANNCSU poiché la loro licenza CC-BY 4.0 è incompatibile con l'ODBL di OSM. Non possiamo utilizzare le loro informazioni né quelle di Poste Italiane o Google, per citare alcuni esempi.
LehnsgutBCH (2025-09-16 17:55:35+00:00): Ciao, grazie! Sto inserendo dei dati acquisiti sul campo, ad es. San Pietro è la denominazione della strada relativa al Comune di Ari, mentre nel territorio di Filetto diventa Calvario, poi Fosso dei Lupi ma in maniera frammentaria (nella stessa via alcuni civici appartengono a Fosso dei Lupi e altri a Calvario).
lalluby6782 (2025-09-19 23:49:46+00:00): El objeto número 1430102810, etiquetado como comida rápida, ya no se encuentra en el lugar
mweper (2025-09-20 01:29:42+00:00): Te referis a https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1430102810 ? Como vi desde satélite algo similar a un carrito de comidas, lo agregué así. 

No existe el carrito físicamente o hay otra cosa? Si no hay nada, se debería borrar.
lalluby6782 (2025-09-20 11:34:48+00:00): Exactamente, el carrito no existe actualmente
woodpeck (2025-09-16 18:58:24+00:00): Dear user Jacksonville, Kartarpur is not a town. Please stop changing it. I have attempted to modify Wikidata and Wikipedia, where this place was falsely listed as "town", to account for this fact.
Jacksonville (2025-09-25 20:52:46+00:00): This is not a place for opinions, and from what can be seen on the Wikipedia article, the sources say it is a border *town*.
woodpeck (2025-09-25 21:12:26+00:00): The termn "town" was introduced by an anonymous source into the Wikipedia page without any supporting evidence. I changed it back to "place", and now you have introduced the term "border town" in Wikipedia. You can falsify Wikipedia all you want; I have no authority there. But you cannot do that here on OpenStreetMap, hence https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18769
Jacksonville (2025-09-28 20:10:12+00:00): I did expect better from a former member of the OSM board, than to stoop to the level of potential doxxing, whether related or not, and then blocking me as well.

I'm here to discuss, what is it that you require? Because all sources point to it being a town, hence my edit of changing the node to a town.

I also don't see yourself to be a Pakistani that you might have on-the-ground knowledge for you to be able to firmly say I'm wrong?
Jacksonville (2025-09-28 20:13:31+00:00): I mean worst comes to the worst, keep it as a locality, but there was no need for a block here.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-09-16 23:01:52+00:00): Please specify what was "done"
flohoff (2026-07-17 14:10:57+00:00): Hi,
warum hast du das hier von footway auf path foot/bicycle geändert? 

Da stehen ganz klar vorne und hinten Zeichen 239 - Also reiner Fußweg - Keine Fahrräder?

Das war schon richtig das ich 2019 das auf footway geändert habe.

Bisschen vorsichter sein - Z239 ist zwar selten in GT - aber es gibt ein paar wege.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26608375/history
stirps (2026-07-17 16:17:59+00:00): Hast Recht, mein Fehler. Muss die Schilder übersehen haben. 

Kann man auf dem Weg selbst mittels source:bicycle=sign oder so angeben dass das aufgrund eines Schildes ist ohne duplizierte Informationen zu haben? Wenn ich das Wiki richtig verstanden habe sollte traffic_sign=* entweder auf eigenen nodes oder auf dem Weg getagged werden und die existieren ja schon als eigene nodes...
flohoff (2026-07-17 19:56:54+00:00): Es gibt mapper die traffic_sign auf wegen taggen - Ich halte das für falsch - Ein traffic_sign ist etwas physisches - das kann ja nicht auf einem weg sein.

Ein bicycle=no kommt immer durch ein Schild - woher sonst? 

Und dafür mache ich ja die ganzen Mapillary Bilder damit man sowas immer kontrollieren kann wie es wirklich vor ort aussieht.
stirps (2026-07-17 20:45:09+00:00): Wäre vielleicht sinnvoll wenn wer selektiv nur highways lädt oder so, da tauchen die Schilder ja nicht auf.
Aber ja ein bicycle=no impliziert ein Verbotsschild, das hatte ich übersehen
flohoff (2026-07-18 22:10:26+00:00): Es wäre sinnvoll nur da dinge zu ändern und einzutragen wo man sich auskennt. Das ist der Grundsatz von OSM - "Ground truth" 

Deshalb mappe ich typischerweise Hauptsächlich da wo ich schon war und auch Fotos gemacht habe damit ich nicht Diskutieren muss wie es vor Ort aussieht.

Einfach mal nach Gefühl eintragen und raten ist jetzt nicht so der OSM weg.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-12 06:50:30+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for Dogtopia POI in changeset 184001429

https://osm.org/changeset/184001429
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-09-16 23:07:21+00:00): What source was used?
notmyproblem1 (2025-11-01 18:11:23+00:00): Le numéro de téléphone du restaurant « Da Gambin » doit rester comme ça pour OSM wiki. C’est +39 0187 410 010, pas +39 1 87 41 00 10.
Le deuxième, il est faux, il fait comme un numéro français.
Je vais corriger ton erreur. Bonne soirée et bon dîner.
xrt (2025-11-10 23:26:26+00:00): Merci notmyproblem d'avoir corrigé mon erreur. Je suis très étonné de cette différence de numéros entre l'Italie et la france ! Je garde de bons souvenirs des repas typiques à Da Gambi. Salutations
notmyproblem1 (2025-11-11 21:21:02+00:00): 😂😂😂❤
StC (2025-09-16 22:57:23+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset ou le précédent sur la même zone a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
josmougn (2025-09-16 23:57:40+00:00): bonjour,
J'ai mis un fixme (à supprimer après réparation)  "mettre la relation compostelle sur le footway séparé" sur ce nœud https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10045388054
Dans osm les footway ont été créés après les cycleway, je pense que ce serait pas mal de transférer la relation pédestre sur les footway maintenant qu'ils ont été tracés.
Glassman (2025-09-16 16:28:46+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

One question, you changed Dense into a cycleway. Are pedestrians not allowed on the trail? If the trail is joint use, then I'd recommend leaving it as highway=path + bicycle=yes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171989715
Natfoot (2026-01-15 16:55:35+00:00): hello as a new editor you might find the wiki on mountain biking helpful in making future edits. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking
I am closing the notes as it looks like you completed the edits.