piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JeroenHoek (2024-02-06 07:28:34+00:00): Volgens de website zit de Griek op 7 in plaats van 7-3. Kan dat kloppen?

Let bij website op dat 'https://' er wel voor moet, die ontbreekt nu.
TrickyFoxy (2024-02-06 08:58:55+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147125447
flohoff (2024-02-07 17:01:51+00:00): Hi,
ich bin nur gerade hier über den Changeset gestolpert. Laut aussage der Webseite sitzen die da aber noch - Oder weisst du mehr?

https://www.elektro-wulfheide.de/

Flo
joge (2024-02-07 21:28:41+00:00): Moin,
Geschäftsaufgabe zum 01.01.2024
joge
eggie (2024-02-05 22:20:44+00:00): Dag n  Je zou covered=yes kunnen bijvoegen. 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147100004

Zie:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:covered%3Dyes

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-02-06 08:58:57+00:00): Als bovenstaand aangepast

MVG
eggie
ALu68 (2024-02-05 21:15:00+00:00): Hallo Oseas Dustin, wo kommt denn der Name "Seufzerallee" her?
user_20963341 (2024-02-06 12:13:07+00:00): Hallo,
der Name ist eher volkstümlich, aber ich habe auch eine literarische Quelle, daher hier ein paar Infos zur Geschichte:

Das erste Mal taucht die gerade Lindenallee auf einem Plan von 1836 auf der Rückseite des Erzberger Guts auf und wird daher bis 1880 >Erzberger-Allee< genannt, später wird daraus >Seufzerallee<. "Über seine Herkunft [des Namens] sind jedoch nur Mutmaßungen möglich. Überliefert ist, dass die Seufzerallee bei jungen Paaren als Treffpunkt beliebt war, vor allem ihr End- und Aussichtspunkt."
1918 wird sie auch >Moltke-Allee< gennant, da sie von der verlängerten (gibt es nicht mehr / heute Erhard-Wunderlich-Allee) Moltkestraße umgeben wird. "[...] 1954 taucht wiederum >Seufzerallee< als damals noch geläufige Bezeichnung [*] in Amtsschreiben auf."

* auch heute ist es insbesondere bei älteren Anwohnern noch ein geläufiger Name.

Quelle:
"Augsburgs grüne Insel. Stadtgarten und Wittelsbacherpark" von Franz Häußler, 2012
ISBN 978-3-939645-48-1

(Kapitel: "An der Seufzerallee" - Seite 66-75)
ALu68 (2024-02-06 22:24:03+00:00): Hallo, meine Anmerkung dazu.

2019 wurde eine bislang namenlosen Zufahrt Erhard-Wunderlich-Allee genannt

https://www.augsburg.de/fileadmin/user_upload/verwaltungswegweiser/geodatenamt/Mitteilung_Strassenbenennung_Erhard_Wunderlich_Allee_Text_und_Plan.pdf

In beiden unteren Quellen wird die Erzbergerallee / Erzberger-Allee genannt

Ich denke, dass der umgangssprachliche Name Seufzerallee sich auf den gleichen Weg/Allee wie die heutige Erhard-Wunderlich-Allee bezieht.

Die Seufzerallee gibt es heute nicht. 

In OSM gibt es zu name mehrere Schlüsselvarianten: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen
Dazu sind auch die "Good practice" zu beachten: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Dinge_so_kartieren,_wie_sie_in_der_Realit%C3%A4t_sind%E2%86%99

__

Ref. Franz Häußler, 2012
"Die zu benennende Zufahrt von der Imhofstraße zur Erhard-Wunderlich-Sporthalle
verläuft entlang einer Allee mit rund 200 Jahre alten Lindenbäumen. Diese Allee führte
einst als Erzbergerallee vom Gartengut der Bankiersfamilie Erzberger an der Gögginger
Straße zu einem beliebten Aussichtspunkt über dem Wertachtal."

Ref. Mitteilung Straßenbenennung 2019
"Das erste Mal taucht die gerade Lindenallee auf einem Plan von 1836 auf der Rückseite des Erzberger Guts auf und wird daher bis 1880 >Erzberger-Allee< genannt"
julcnx (2024-02-06 06:02:07+00:00): Thanks, TheTreeofPasts, for your contributions! Do not forget to upload your GPX traces to OSM for consistency :) If you're interested in high-accuracy alignment, check out this Chrome extension that integrate the Strava Heatmap: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/id-strava-heatmap/eglbcifjafncknmpmnelckombmgddlco
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147100312
simo_explorer (2024-02-07 10:58:45+00:00): Hi Urban Connect
what is it ?
CurlingMan13 (2024-02-05 19:13:17+00:00): Please review:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=Overlapping%20green/fairway/rough%20polygons%20(see%20graphic%20below)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147100348
barkerid (2024-02-05 20:32:06+00:00): My bad.  First time doing a golf course.   Saw one nearby with this sort of overlap - so did it here even though it didn't make sense to me.  Will fix it shortly.
CurlingMan13 (2024-02-07 23:08:38+00:00): No problem.  Yeah, there are a number that are mapped incorrectly like that, and I have been trying to fix them, but it is hard to keep up sometimes. Once you get done with this one, feel free to make corrections to that one.

Thanks!
wireguy (2024-02-05 20:53:34+00:00): Hi Emma, welcome to OSM!  Try and outline the footprint of the building more exact.   Pressing the 'Q' key when the building is selected will square the corners for you.   Also, name field should not be used for generic things, like apartments.  Use it for proper names, like Wilson High School.    Keep mapping!
wireguy (2024-02-05 21:01:22+00:00): Please read the wiki for the proper way to tag a hydrant: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147100621
silversurfer83 (2024-02-05 16:41:52+00:00): Gude Jens :)

ich hab zufällig grad diese Änderung gesehen und muss mal fragen, ob du dir mit der Hausnummer sicher bist.
Du hast angegeben, dass du selbst geguckt hast, ich möchte jedoch nochmal sicher gehen, da die Liegenschaftskarte Hessen für dieses Gebäude die Hausnummer 30a angibt.

Grüße
silversurfer83
Jens Herden (2024-02-05 17:27:20+00:00): Hallo silversurfer83,
spannend, im Geoportal sehe ich auch die 30a. Aber ich stand vor dem Haus und es war eine 34 dran. 
Keine Ahnung was richtig ist.
Gruß Jens
silversurfer83 (2024-02-05 19:48:49+00:00): Hallo Jens

Danke für die schnelle Reaktion.
Wenn da jemand eine 34 dran hängt werden die Bewohner*innen ihre Post und Pizza und auch den Notarzt zur 34 bestellen. Ich würde also die Zahl, die am Gebäude steht immer der Zahl der Behörden vorziehen :)
Bei OSM nennen wir das Ground Truth. 

Alles Gute
Silversurfer83
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-05 16:40:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8077362128

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
CurlingMan13 (2024-02-05 19:12:46+00:00): When mapping golf course features, do not overlap them partially.  The smaller one can be completely in the larger one, or they can not overlap at all.  Review here for more info:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=Overlapping%20green/fairway/rough%20polygons%20(see%20graphic%20below)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147100994
felipeeugenio (2024-02-05 21:10:03+00:00): Hola. Culvert es para cuando el rio pasa por un tubo.

saludos
Robot8A (2024-02-17 11:55:53+00:00): Buenas, kapazao_import.
He tenido que arreglar ya unas cuantas vías de esta edición que no son rotondas, con el challenge de la dirección de los Stop (https://maproulette.org/challenge/42095). Las rotondas por definición no pueden tener un stop, un semáforo o un ceda dentro de ellos, entonces serían junction=circular (al no tener prioridad la vía circular). En otros casos he visto que también marcas raquetas (en inglés throughabout o hamburger roundabout) como rotondas, cuando tampoco lo son. Las rotondas no tienen una vía cruzándolas por enmedio. 
No revierto la edición porque hay muchas ediciones buenas, pero cuando vaya viendo alguna mala la voy corrigiendo.
Por favor, échale un vistazo a la wiki sobre rotondas: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:junction%3Droundabout

Saludos,
Héctor "Robot8A"
kapazao (2024-02-18 16:37:13+00:00): Hola Héctor,
en este conjunto de cambios me límite únicamente a eliminar el etiquetado oneway=yes de rotondas junction=roundabout y nada más.
Esto corrige problemas de etiquetado redundante, pero no analicé una a una las rotondas para ver si el etiquetado junction=roundabout era correcto. Debía suponer que sí en base a lo que ya había y que otros usuarios habían puesto, que son los responsables de si está bien o no la rotonda como roundabout, circular o lo que sea. Puedes ver el histórico.
Por mi parte conozco las diferencias entre los distintos tipos de junction, agradezco los comentarios.
Con Osmose también se pueden comprobar muchos de estos errores en rotondas y en muchos casos ya lo he ido corrigiendo, pero todavía faltará supongo.
Un saludo
eggie (2024-02-05 17:46:00+00:00): Dag Rick.. Probeer svp bij te taggen op de bestaande BAG adresnodes.
Liever ook niet schuiven met de bedrijven en dan he adresaanpassen. Wanneer een bedrijf verhuist zal toch het oude adres blijven bestaan? 

MVG
eggie
rickmakkinga (2024-02-05 19:31:17+00:00): Ah ik dacht dat ik destijds het bedrijf handmatig aangemaakt had omdat het om een verzamelgebouw gaat. Er zijn dus meer bedrijven dan BAG adressen.
eggie (2024-02-05 19:59:30+00:00): Yep.. daar is geen goede oplossing voor.
Her verwijderde adres was geen Bag import. Dus geen probleem.
Het nieuwe adres heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande bag node.
Mvg
eggie
silversurfer83 (2024-02-07 16:15:57+00:00): Hi again :)

two things:

please check the wiki page on ATMs. You'll find, that "amenity=atm" doesn't need "atm=yes". The tag "atm=yes" is used for banks to indicate that the place also offers an atm service.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Datm


Also there's still the problem of you not having an explanation what kind of "community" you are and you still don't give a source for your change in the change set. The editor (iD) offers the source field when you start the upload.

Please make this better. thank you.
Melan839 (2024-02-07 16:35:56+00:00): Hi Silversurfer83, I made the change on this changeset. And in the next few days, will make this change in my previous changesets also w.r.t to atm=yes where I put it specifically for an atm machine.

As to the local community part, I already explained in detail in our previous messages on another changeset :) but i try here again. We are nothing but a small group of former teachers that have come together for social work and helping local and international students with better learning and studying opportunities. so in our small network, as i explained earlier, we exchange a lot of information which is relevant for students and got by students, all of us who like to contribute to the community. One of them we recently learnt will be to contribute data on OSM. We did not know about this earlier but may have likely used some of the data from OSM's open source databases so we wanted to give back. Given this is my first time at this, I realise this is all so much more complicated than i initially thought!
nyampire (2024-02-11 08:33:04+00:00): こんにちは、OSMへようこそ。

すみません、昨今、ユーザ名に mic_ という接頭辞をつけたユーザが多く登録され、建物名などの編集を行っているようです。
OSMへの参加はどなたでも行うことができ、また、企業として編集に参加をいただくことは基本的に歓迎するものではありますが、いくつかの注意点があります。
ご確認をいただけますでしょうか。

* 企業などが組織的に編集を行う場合、「Orrganised Editing Guidelines」に従う必要があります。
* 具体的には、OSM wikiへのドキュメント作成や、編集内容などのコミュニティへの連絡などを行う必要があります。

https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

* こちらについてご確認をいただき、対応をお願いできるでしょうか。
* もし不明点がありましたら、OSMF Japanでも相談を受け付ける事が可能です。info@osmf.jp までご連絡ください。

また、mic_ を接頭辞にもつユーザさんの編集には、自身で調査をされたとは考えづらい、広域の編集も多く見られます。
それらの編集に際し、著作権あるいはその他の権利で保護された情報源を活用している可能性があると考えています。
OSMは、自由な地図であり続けるために、特別な許諾が無い限り、他の地図やデータセットからの転載を禁じています。

こちらについて、どのような情報源を用いて名称や建物階数の編集を行っているか、ご教示をいただけるでしょうか。

https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright

```
著作権侵害

OpenStreetMapの協力者は、著作権者から明確な許諾を得ずに、著作権のある情報源 (例: Google マップや印刷された地図) から決してデータを持ち込まないよう注意するものとします。
```

もしお返事をいただけない場合、内容の疑わしい編集と判断し、Data Working Groupと協力の上、対象ユーザの凍結および関連する編集の巻き戻しを行います。
以上二点、何卒よろしくお願いいたします。
mic_fujii_to (2024-02-12 03:08:10+00:00): ご連絡ありがとうございます。

1点目について、
「Organised Editing Guidelines」のご提示ありがとうございます。
勤務時間外の活動ではありますが、「組織的編集」にあたるのか所属組織へ確認しておきます。
（恐らく、担当者よりOSMF Japan様へご連絡させて頂くことになるかと存じます）

2点目について、
私の変更内容に関しては「現地調査」となります。
プライベートな内容も含んでおりますのであまりコメントに残したくはない内容ではありますが、神戸市内に10年以上居住および勤務しており、現在の居住地および以前の居住地、物件の内見時のメモ、休日の訪問先および経路沿い、勤務先の周辺および通勤経路沿いの情報を入力しています。

以上、よろしくお願い致します。
nyampire (2024-02-13 04:27:24+00:00): こんにちは、ご連絡をいただきありがとうございます。
勤務時間外の活動ということで、組織的編集に該当するかどうかについてはご提案のとおり、別途ご連絡をいただき、そこでお話をさせていただければと思います。
前向きな話ができたらと思いますので、ご連絡をお待ちしております、とお伝えください。

また、変更内容の情報源についても了解いたしました。
その状況であれば、権利的に全く問題ありません。疑ってしまい、すみませんでした。
コメントの記載については、以下のページで、入力しておくとよい内容について解説されています。
ご参考までに御覧ください。

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E5%A4%89%E6%9B%B4%E3%82%BB%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%E3%81%AE%E8%89%AF%E3%81%84%E3%82%B3%E3%83%A1%E3%83%B3%E3%83%88

今後ともよろしくお願いします。
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-21 17:15:18+00:00): The "q" key can help with right angle corners.  "r" and "m" for rotate and move.  Really helps with the fine details.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147102893
Hufkratzer (2024-02-05 21:10:54+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1246441708 is not a riding center (German: Reitanlage), it is a riding arena (German: Reitplatz), similar to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/565942425. iD has a preset for riding arenas that sets the correct tags leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian
Leo Slager (2024-02-06 11:06:04+00:00): Maar er lopen afslaande routerelaties over die kruising. Die ways moeten dus gesplitst blijven.
ik pas het even aan.
emersonveenstra (2024-02-15 12:10:54+00:00): Hi there,

Is there a reason why you left a small gap between https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11587783417 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11587783393
Buster452 (2024-02-15 15:02:18+00:00): Thanks, missed that one.  Fixed it.

BTW, I just saw in the news that a good chunk of that area is going to be closed and turned into a recreation site.  I need to head out and figure out the extent of the closure and mark those trails as closed now.   

Bunch of wasted work.  It'll probably get revegetated and those tracks will be gone in a couple years.
TrickyFoxy (2024-02-05 18:03:04+00:00): Какие другие открытые карты?
TrickyFoxy (2024-02-05 18:04:14+00:00): И да, вы зря удалили building, теперь здания больше не отображаются как здания
AndrWhite (2024-02-05 18:17:51+00:00): Yandex
Ошибся, исправлюсь
TrickyFoxy (2024-02-05 18:19:33+00:00): Яндекс нельзя использовать для osm
AndrWhite (2024-02-05 18:24:17+00:00): Даже для уточнения высоты зданий? В условиях использования народной карты ничего не указано
TrickyFoxy (2024-02-05 18:26:14+00:00): Даже для этого. Можно только смотреть на их панорамы
santamariense (2024-02-08 15:23:57+00:00): Olá Leonardo,

Bem-vindo ao OSM. É preciso categorizar o estabelecimento para que seja encontrável. Imagino que adicionar a tag shop=clothes seja o suficiente.

Bons mapeamentos,
santamariense
Leonardo Petta do Nascimento (2024-02-08 15:42:33+00:00): Obrigado pelo aviso. Já lancei uma correção.
wkdgs (2024-02-06 17:33:04+00:00): Ok, aber was hat das damit zu tun, dass du die Laterne ins Wohngebiet verschoben hast?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147103848
Niko Laj (2024-02-06 17:43:45+00:00): Offensichtlich ein Fehler.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147103848
jpennycook (2024-02-05 22:30:27+00:00): hi!

You added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1246444982 - a cycleway parallel to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162735621 which already had the necessary cycleway tags on it.  I'll remove the duplicate.

Jon
jpennycook (2024-02-05 22:36:55+00:00): This article explains the tagging for on-road cycle lanes that are not physically segregated from motor traffic:-
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dlane
I-76 (2024-02-26 14:08:29+00:00): Please comment on this changeset if you'd like to speak about it.
wireguy (2024-02-26 15:50:23+00:00): removed the layer tag on the building.
removed overlapping path.
added tactile paving.
some other fixes.
i2004 (2024-02-05 22:25:46+00:00): te deje una parada del 60 para que me organizes
VictorIE (2024-07-24 13:39:26+00:00): Hi,

Some double-mapped streams around here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1211041240
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-05 18:31:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1246103741

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
maraf24 (2024-08-18 20:09:40+00:00): Import adresów bez weryfikacji - zostały stare śmieci na budynkach.
The Polish (2024-08-19 11:31:21+00:00): Poprawiłem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155455613
mavl (2024-02-06 16:44:20+00:00): Здравствуйте. У этого здания тег "building" не был восстановлен:  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110610082/history
jeslop (2024-02-06 10:04:13+00:00): Hola Vlanzarote. Los cambios de nombres que has realizado no son correctos, la fuente proporcionada por el usuario Jordi MF está más actualizada que el Catastro.
Los revierto.

Jesús López en nombre del Data Working Group
VigilantPenguin (2024-02-05 18:45:36+00:00): I still believe "living street" should apply to the stretch of N 100th St between Stone Ave N and College Way N but consensus has not been reached. I will revisit once the planned upgrades to this stretch are constructed (expected this year).
VigilantPenguin (2024-02-05 18:53:44+00:00): Made a mistake that I corrected in changeset 147105488.
MxxCon (2024-02-09 06:47:48+00:00): When specifying height or weight or other parameters and you see that StreetComplete highlights a longer than necessary part of a road, it's best to go into "other answers", select "differs along the way" and it'll bring you to a simple UI where you can split/cut a way into smaller pieces.
Doing that will allow you then to tag height or whatever only to sections where it actually applies.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147105160
IraGersh (2024-02-09 12:26:04+00:00): Interesting. Street complete first asked about signage and I didn't see any. Then it wanted to know how high a truck could be for a particular bridge. That max height does very because some of the bridges are very high and one is not. It didn't occur to me that the answer was applying to all of Dyckman Street.
IraGersh (2024-02-10 02:10:03+00:00): There was a tag that said height=default.  I removed it.  Wouldn't have seen it if I hadn't been looking at the OSMCha view.  Also that street is marked as 20mph.  That's news to me.  I'll look tomorrow.
MxxCon (2024-02-10 02:20:18+00:00): You can confirm speed limits on https://vzv.nyc/
maxheight=default is a valid tag value https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxheight I'm not saying it's correct here, but it can be correct. Also nyc gov't has a database ..somewhere..(i don't remember where exactly i saw it) online with bridge/overpass heights.
IraGersh (2024-02-10 02:26:44+00:00): I'll check it out.  There are three bridges there.  There are no signs indicating max height.  At the first two bridges there was incredible clearance but at the last there should have been a clearance sign but then it goes into a dead end and I'd guess no trucks ever go there, though it would be a great place to go to turn around.
olo81 (2024-02-05 23:56:14+00:00): Dlaczego to zmieniłeś? 
To rondo ma przejezdną wyspę? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:junction%3Droundabout

Jeśli jest przejezdna to zestaw zmian do wycofania.
olo81 (2024-02-05 23:57:50+00:00): Jest przejezdne, wycofuje!
https://bedzin.naszemiasto.pl/czeladz-nowe-rondo-w-miescie-dwie-kolejne-miejskie-ulice/ar/c1-9410725
blackboxlogic (2024-02-06 17:56:58+00:00): Hello Bobby Rock 999,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for adding to the map. It's normal for new mappers to make small mistakes and I try to offer gentle guidance so this map can be more complete and useful.

Those houses... You gave them addresses but you used the name tag. For addresses to be useful they need to be in their own tags, like the street name goes in "addr:street" tag.

But also, the addresses already existed as nodes before. It would be fine to just leave the address node separate from the building and not give the building its own address tags. It would be fine to move the address tags to the building and then delete the node. Let me know if you have questions.

In case you like reading long technical documents: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses

-Alex
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147105610
German C (2024-03-17 16:16:04+00:00): Hola P@cho24,

Bienvenido a openstreetmap, el sitio que has editado no se ve como un área designada para escombros , tal vez sea un leisure=park (parque con más árboles que área pavimentada) o un place=square (plaza con más área pavimentada que árboles), si no estas seguro que tipo de área es, puedes dejar con la etiqueta original de parque.

Si no recuerdas que había antes de la edición puedes puedes revisar el historial de área aquí: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/241132298
UNGSC-mbranco2 (2024-02-05 19:01:35+00:00): I've used MapWithAI too!
rskedgell (2024-02-05 23:11:38+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and many thanks for adding a missing pedestrian link.

You can include the steps themselves as a segment in the middle of the new footway using highway=steps, which is documented here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsteps

If you'd like any help with this, please feel free to ask.
GinaroZ (2024-02-07 00:20:53+00:00): Hi Chris, thanks for adding these buildings. Just to note that if a building already has a addr:housenumber then it doesn't need to be duplicated in the name tag :)
citrula (2024-02-05 19:25:36+00:00): looks good to me! welcome to OSM!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147106167
citrula (2024-02-05 19:27:01+00:00): Is this a drinking fountain/water fountain? If so, you can tag it with amenity=drinking_water instead
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147106291
pescosm (2024-02-06 15:34:27+00:00): it is a drinking fountain. how can i tag it correctly?
Gaurav Parajuli (2024-02-07 09:46:20+00:00): You can also tag it as amenity=fountain. I found the similar tagging here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3678713030
citrula (2024-02-07 18:54:01+00:00): amenity=fountain is for decorative fountains. You can always refer to the wiki to see how the tag is expected to be used. For example, the page for drinking water: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddrinking_water

You can refer to the "Useful combinations" section, or just look at the fields that iD presents you with.
vng_me (2024-02-05 19:47:11+00:00): I already wrote you in other comments. Your changes are controversial. Especially access=no. Please, talk to the local UK community first.
vng_me (2024-02-05 20:09:15+00:00): 1. access=no may technically be used to include eg foot=no , but semantically it's not nice for showing something that doesn't apply as a whole to the general public. If needed, using foot= or motor_vehicle=  alone is better.
2. motor_vehcle=permissive is a very common possible mistake . It doesn't mean by "permission" , "permit" , or whatever else. It has a very specific meaning.  If everyone can pay to get in, it is considered =yes .