piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SpinOff (2025-09-23 21:27:44+00:00): Tytuł changesetu nie ma związku z dokonaną w nim zmianą. highway=track to nie jest droga polna lub leśna, tylko droga prowadząca tylko na pole lub tylko do lasu.

Adresy 24a, 22a, 18a i 16a ewidentnie mają bramy wychodzące na tę drogę, więc ta droga po prostu nie może być oznaczona jako highway=track. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce

W najbliższym czasie wycofam tę zmianę, ale możesz sam poprawić jeśli znajdziesz czas.
timonoff (2025-09-24 05:44:44+00:00): Wymienione przez Ciebie budynki powstały przy prywatnym polu i dojazd mają zapewniony po jego wyjeżdżonym fragmencie. Jeszcze nic tutaj nie zbudowano. Był nawet wyrok sądowy w tej sprawie, bo jeden facet walczył, by wreszcie coś powstało. 
Rozumiem Cię, że highway=track nie pasuje, bo oznacza drogę prowadzącą wyłącznie do lasu lub na pole. Zgodnie ze znakowaniem dróg będzie to maks highway=service. Naniosę zmiany dla tego odcinka i dla fragmentu ul. Skrajnej, którym się do niego dojeżdża.
SpinOff (2025-09-25 20:14:33+00:00): Dzięki :)
SekeRob (2024-03-27 14:06:14+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for mapping in Italy. Notably you've created multiple duplicate ways in town and the large circular at the west. The latter is actually not a roundabout as there are 2 stop signs in the ring. I've corrected that one.

Kindly take care of the duplicate ways in Catanzaro. Where they are exactly you can see in this map by OSM Inspector, the dark blue lines.

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=16.59526&lat=38.90223&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cislands_car%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

Strangely there's now e.g. an alley way on top of steps by the name of 
Discesa San Francesco di Paola. We can't have 2 ways on top of each other and why the alley is now on layer=1 suggests there's a bridge, but no bridge=yes tag (think ID Editor makes it too easy to just add a layer tag when 2 ways on top or ways crossing buildings)

Happy mapping & thanks
Rob

PS When mapping in Italy, please do your change set comments in Italian or English which most mappers understand, Czech we don't speak ;O)
HaPe-CZ (2024-05-04 20:15:41+00:00): Duplicita? Hlavním prvkem je ulice / ulička. Tyto cesty ale nejsou sjízdné, protože zde jsou chody "na ulici".
eggie (2024-03-20 21:28:15+00:00): Dag Johan   Dit is helaas niet correct.
Even het bekende riedeltje om het duidelijk te maken, want dit gebeurt nogal eens.
Niet simpelweg iets omzetten in een park. Dit gebeurt meestal om het spel PokemonGo te beïnvloeden. 
Je verwijdert de details en vervangt deze door een transparant.  
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam.  

Leisure=park is de functie en die moet je los zien van wat je ziet de landuse. 

Hier een voorbeeld van een park met landuse en een losse cover leisure= park er helemaal los overheen. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80552/4.66665 

MVG
eggie..
eggie (2024-03-20 21:35:16+00:00): De landuse heb ik weer teruggezet. De functie kun je dus met een aparte transparant leisure=park over alles heen leggen.
MVG
eggie
johanvanolde-nb-arneveldt (2024-03-20 21:39:19+00:00): Bedankt, ik was me niet ervan bewust dat "park" zo een officiële status had. Ik denk dat grasland dan wellicht beter is, aangezien het meer een openbare ruimte is en niet werkelijk een naam heeft.
eggie (2024-03-20 21:44:03+00:00): Up to you :)
Park zou kunnen.. 
Wanneer het niet echt een naam heeft kun je het ook zo laten.
Even wat losse bomen toegevoegd en het eilandje uitgelijnd met de BGT 
leisure=bandstand toegevoegd.
johanvanolde-nb-arneveldt (2024-03-20 21:59:52+00:00): Zou leisure=bandstand correct zijn als die functie niet meer werkelijk zo is? Het wordt de muziekkoepel genoemd, maar in feite is dat lang niet meer zo. Het is eerder een overdekte hexagon met een paar bankjes. Daarnaast zou de koepel een hexagon moeten zijn, niet een octagon zoals het nu op de kaart lijkt te staan.
eggie (2024-03-20 22:28:12+00:00): Toen ik het eilandje had aangepast heb ik ook de 'koepel' uitgelijnd met de BGT. Een zeshoek dus. Even CTRL-f5 voor het effect. 
De bandstand functie haal ik er wel af.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-03-20 22:29:42+00:00): .. en eigenlijk zou het als building=roof layer =  1 kunnen worden getagd als het alleen een dak is.
johanvanolde-nb-arneveldt (2024-03-20 22:35:17+00:00): Het is niet enkel een dak, ook een verharde, verhoogde vloer en railing aan de buitenkant, dus dat zou niet toepasselijk zijn denk ik. En bedankt voor het weghalen van de bandstand, en ctrl f5 doet het inderdaad.
eggie (2024-03-20 22:38:46+00:00): Dan is het nu correct.. 😀
PeakP (2024-03-29 00:10:17+00:00): Hier ist lediglich ein Fahrverbot, access ist hier also der falsche Tag, weil Fußgänger dennoch erlaubt sind.
Allroads (2024-03-21 03:55:09+00:00): Goedendag,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1264463912#map=18/52.92201/6.33452

Hier tekent u een extra weg in die er in de werkelijkheid niet ligt. 
Omdat aan het begin een G13 "onverplicht fietspad" staat is deze weg "fietspad" met klinkers. De door u ingetekende weg ligt er niet. 

Zoals u misschien gezien hebt heb ik al vele paden en wegen aangepast, goed gelegd  n.a.v. een gesprek met Staatsbosbeheer.
Heeft u data van staatsbosbeheer tot uw beschikking?

Zijn de G13 onverplicht fietspadborden er niet meer? Dat is bepalend voor intekening. Over het middenstuk van De Soevert had ik ook mijn twijfels. Omdat het gehele stuk tussen de twee parkeeplaatsen fiets kan zijn. Lastig in het gebied ertussen is er geen herhaling van G13 borden.


2019
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3960104980739052

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=314177903566057
Er kunnen wijzingen zijn.

Daarnaast heb ik vele bekeken met Slagboom en Peters obliek beelden.

Zo ook met AHN beelden.
http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~allroads/NLOSMOK/OSMOKNL.html#map=20.67/52.9118/6.3014/0

Concreet: daar liggen geen twee paden naast elkaar.

Breedte van een fietspad toevoegen zou dan gewenst zijn.

Ik zag wel dat er een aantal highway=path zijn, waar eigenlijk een highway=track gepast is, toegang meersporige voertuigen. Ook gezien dat er een aantal hekken staan waarop een bord staat dat het moest worden vrijgehouden voor hulp.

Groeten Allroads
eggie (2024-03-20 15:56:17+00:00): Johan Hier klopt iets niet.. alleen brommer mogen tegen het verkeer in en fietsers zijn niet uitgezonderd.
En op het stuk oneway no hoten geen uitzonderingen voor tweewielers te worden getagd.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2024-03-20 15:57:00+00:00): Typo fietsers zijn niet uitgezonderd?
johanvanolde-nb-arneveldt (2024-03-20 16:05:57+00:00): Als het goed is is het nu gefixt
eggie (2024-03-20 16:10:09+00:00): 👍
VictorIE (2024-08-07 11:25:33+00:00): Please see discussion on talk-ie@openstreetmap.org
Skylark_H_C (2024-03-21 05:09:10+00:00): 请不要做出实地不存在的编辑，谢谢
规划请标打construction或者proposal标签
Please do not mark non-existent elements. If it is a plan, use the "construction" or "proposal" tag instead.
bxl-forever (2024-03-20 16:33:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17366600 is not a valid multipolygon, please fix it.
mueschel (2024-03-21 10:13:13+00:00): Hi,
please check your edits, there ade about 100 'neme' tags instead of 'name'.
MxxCon (2024-03-20 18:03:23+00:00): Hello.
Instead of deleting existing features and creating new ones, whenever possible, it's better to update the existing features into their correct state. Doing that preserves history of that object, which can be useful to refer to in the future.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148916137
Dewi Sulistioningrum (2024-03-26 01:42:54+00:00): Hallo w_djatmiko, sebaiknya tidak melakukan pemetaan banjir dengan menggunakan tag landuse=military dimana tidak menginformasikan tagging kejadian banjir. Untuk referensi pemetaan hazard dapat klik link berikut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hazard
Dewi Sulistioningrum (2024-03-26 01:44:49+00:00): Juga terdapat di PP RI NOMOR 45 TAHUN 2021 tentang penyelenggaraan informasi geospasial Pasal 24, tidak diperkenankan melakukan pemetaan pada kawasan terlarang salah satunya wilayah pertahanan dan keamanan, jadi sebaiknya tidak menggunakan tagging landuse=military
Frans S (2024-03-20 16:50:33+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings not accurate mapped and show an offset.
Use Bing imagery.

buildings not squared.

Don't you use the building plugin ? 

Some buildings need to be mapped again.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148916846
user_14600927 (2024-04-01 12:47:54+00:00): As commented on other edits, Pollywiggle Lane is not a private road, but rather a private right of way through public lands (Graham Hills Park).
MHNS (2024-04-01 14:40:23+00:00): Parts of Pollywiggle are private road and parts are right of way.  The entire street is maintained and plowed by the homeowners who live there. The right of way is given to the homeowners to get to their properties and not for use by the general public. Westchester County Parks has stated that the only public access into the park is through the official park entrance.
ZLima12 (2025-10-30 08:32:13+00:00): Hello,

Even if the trail was completely on private property, deleting it from the map is not allowed. You can read about this here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

So either way, the trail should be in the map, as long as it exists. The question is what the access value should be. The trail is on public land, so it seems to me like access should not be `private` or `no`.
Frans S (2024-03-21 18:06:44+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark about mapping highways
How to decide when a trace is a path or an unclassified highway
First, look what they connect.  Houses, settlements, villages. Then measure the width of that trace.
In iDeditor 

Shortcut : Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle  opens measurement panel
Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.
If a trace is max 2 meters wide, tag it as a path.
Wider and connect hamlets, houses and villages should be tagged as unclassified.
Tag residential in urban areas (villages, towns)
In JOSM, use the measure tab, or draw a circle (round building, shortcut Alt-Z when the building plugin is installed)) between the shoulders of a trace and read the distance on the lower toolbar. (remove the circle after that)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
This is mentioned about tracks on the
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routing#Routing_considerations

Quote: Tracks are roads of agricultural purpose. They usually connect fields to farms. The surface sometimes makes them inaccessible for regular cars, or at least limits the speeds to a very slow pace. Tracks should always be avoided for through-going traffic or within urban areas.
user_14600927 (2024-04-01 12:44:37+00:00): Pollywiggle Lane is a part of Graham Hills Park, it is a private right of way through public property.
user_14600927 (2024-04-01 12:53:51+00:00): Foshay Avenue is a public street in the Town of Mt. Pleasant, not a "private neighborhood". There is well established usage of Graham Hills Park from Foshay Ave.
MHNS (2024-04-01 14:29:07+00:00): Westchester County Parks has confirmed that the park should only be accessed through the park entrance.  Of course those living in that neighborhood should feel free to enter the park that way.  But no one should be parking there to enter the park.
Allison P (2024-04-01 20:04:46+00:00): access=no is still inappropriate, and I imagine anyone can still use the path to walk along Foshay Avenue. It would be better to tag the parking restrictions on Foshay Avenue.
ZLima12 (2025-10-30 09:22:11+00:00): Yes, I removed the access restrictions because this is a public park and a public street. If parking is not allowed on the street, then map that.
MainFlag0681 (2025-03-09 21:55:43+00:00): Howcome Myson's Tires has a road foing through it?


https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/795473084#map=19/33.962712/-80.420354
Lkumar_lyft (2025-03-11 10:45:13+00:00): Hi MainFlag0681, I’m Lalit and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. 
The roads were added based on the Lyft-owned aerial imagery, dated February 2025:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1U9s4ICTN2vEQUMdqJKb3Bjm5rfcZqp1S/view?usp=drive_link
I added the "demolished" tag because the building is no longer present on the map. Unfortunately, I did not remove the other tags, which is why Myson's Tires label remained on the map. I apologize for this oversight and remove these tags in the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163478530. 
Thank you for your feedback and your contribution to OSM.

Best regards,
Lalit
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 21:12:30+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11748319282/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle:repair and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service:bicycle:repair
Yunan973 (2025-12-08 13:58:44+00:00): I don't understand why to use motorcycle:repair for motorcycle, service:vehicule:car_repair for cars, service:vehicle:truck_repair for truck and service:bicycle:repair for bicycle : very inconsistent.
I think a proposal or discussion is needed to have coherent tags for all these vehicules (and others : some shop repairs/improve only 4x4, some other repair electric kick scooters...) before to make any changes.
Dimitar155 (2024-03-20 17:54:58+00:00): Is it vacant or it's completely demolished? If it's vacant, it's better to map it as such. Otherwise SC won't ever ask you about it and it would be very easy to miss it.
rhhs (2024-03-20 19:21:40+00:00): There is no space for a shop in between the beauty shop and the pizza fast food. I moved the shops a bit to show this
Dimitar155 (2024-03-20 20:26:39+00:00): Thanks for clarifying!
YomanNH (2024-03-21 06:52:30+00:00): Na tym fragmencie nie ma już drogi dla rowerów? Odcinek, o który pytałem w uwadze https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4160559 to nie jest odcinek, który zmieniłeś, o ile taki miałeś plan. Moja uwaga znajduje się na tym odcinku: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1058943489
Pozdrawiam
felipeeugenio (2025-02-21 13:50:44+00:00): Hello. A "voie rapide" does not imply =trunk at all.
Although this entire highway might be a trunk as a whole.
But interchange primary and trunk like this is a wrong way to board this concept.

regards
DENelson83 (2024-03-20 18:54:41+00:00): Thank you so much for this!  I am trying to cover the rest of Vancouver Island with woodland data, and this is a big help.
Enderbyte99 (2024-03-20 20:07:25+00:00): You are very welcome. I love mapping landuses
FraserKp (2024-03-20 21:55:29+00:00): If you use the "Q" shortcut key in ID, it will make all the angles in the shape right angles, which I think would result in a tidier version of this building geometry.
NextGen AV (2024-03-21 08:53:43+00:00): Thanks, but this is my house and it was built in 1694 ... not very many right angles! I've also built an extension and have several other buildings to add when I get time. Cheers
FraserKp (2024-03-22 14:13:28+00:00): ha! Apologies, I didn't realise I was speaking to the Laird himself :)
NextGen AV (2024-03-22 16:46:58+00:00): No problem, the garage has right angles so your shortcut tip will be helpful. Cheers
tom_yorados (2024-03-20 16:11:31+00:00): schön
mcliquid (2024-03-20 16:47:24+00:00): I think it would be great if you could indicate or link to the corresponding reverted changeset in a revert. Thank you!
dpaschich (2024-03-20 18:56:33+00:00): This was a reversion of 148896026. Sorry for the back and forth/confusion on this!
mcliquid (2024-03-20 19:03:45+00:00): Thanks!
mueschel (2024-03-26 18:42:01+00:00): Hi,
could you check your recent edits? There are 20 crossings with a "hightway" tag.
Paul_geovelo (2024-03-27 08:32:15+00:00): Hi, thanks for letting me know. Indeed, I confused 'hightway' and 'highway.' I have now corrected my mistake.
gogorm (2024-03-21 12:23:14+00:00): Hey,

In relation to the cycle tracks that you added as separately mapped ways:

Please pay attention to the cycle lanes/tracks that have already been added by others using cycleway tags on the way that is the centreline of the roadway. e.g. at Constitution Hill (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370381577)

There is already
cycleway:both=lane
cycleway:both:lane=exclusive
...along a part where you have added a separate cycleway. Your addition conflicts with these tags. This conflict should be resolved somehow.

Accordingly, I want to point out the guidance given on the OSM wiki at this page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway#When_not_to_use and the various other pages which that page links to, in case you weren't aware.

Thanks
Own Oh (2024-03-22 10:21:12+00:00): Yes, that's grand, thanks. I'll delete my change and thanks for the steer.
gogorm (2024-03-22 13:56:48+00:00): Thanks for your understanding!
bxl-forever (2024-03-20 16:29:24+00:00): Hello,
No addresses on such objects, please.
There is already a relation to link it to the correct address.  OSM is a database, we won’t repeat all the elements of the address on every object.
Also, adding name:nl as an identical copy of the name tag shows no added value.
We fixed your edit.
Gijs Ipers (2024-03-20 17:16:42+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for bringing the link with the address to my attention; I wasn't aware of it before.
I'd like to clarify that the name wasn't an exact copy. In English, "Brussels" is spelled with an "s" at the end, whereas in Dutch, it is spelled without an "s". Would it be okay if I revert this change?
bxl-forever (2024-03-21 08:36:41+00:00): OK for the NL name, slight difference indeed.  But the convention for schools is that the main name uses the primary language of the school.  So, Campus Sint-Lukas Brussel in the main name here.  We fixed it.
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2024-04-14 20:49:18+00:00): The key:name should only contain the proper name (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names). "e-laden Tirol Charging Station” is not a proper name, but a generic name. Please note that charging stations in Austria do not usually have a proper name.
Kookykooky (2024-04-15 06:02:42+00:00): Ok, thanks for your comment, I'll be more careful. :)
Yunkers (2024-04-01 20:46:47+00:00): Książę Janusz to nie był "prince", tylko "duke" 
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duchy_of_Warsaw_(Middle_Ages)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janusz_I_the_Old
Przejrzyj naprawdę te nazwy.
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-03-21 21:20:05+00:00): Hi nick-28,

in Deutschland gibt es keine amenity=post_office mehr. Die richtige Erfassung ist hier beschrieben:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:post_office%3Dpost_partner

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
nick-28 (2024-03-22 10:50:29+00:00): OK, das wusste ich noch nicht. Danke! Dann gibt es allerdings noch sehr viel zu ändern.
mueschel (2024-03-23 09:45:05+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
I see that you added many tags like these:

edificio progettato = si
elementi identitari = /
servizi presenti = Bar
stato edificio = Buono
tipo di copertura = Piano
valore storico = no

In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please make sure that you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.

If you have questions, please feel free to ask in the forums!

PS: It looks like you're working in a group with other mappers. Please point your supervisor / group leader to our organized editing guidelines:
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
ivanbranco (2024-03-23 13:09:57+00:00): Ciao AlessioBin, questo e altri tuoi changeset sono stati annullati per ripristinare la situazione precedente. La motivazione é che le linee guida per gli import ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ) e quelle per le modifiche di gruppo ( https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines ) non sono state rispettate. Per favore seguite le linee guida prima di procedere con ulteriori modifiche.
iandees (2024-03-20 18:27:47+00:00): Reverting due to delete+recreate instead of improving existing data.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148928621
maraf24 (2024-04-01 00:01:18+00:00): Most Świętego Krzyża?
Alanantos (2024-04-01 15:20:36+00:00): Świętokrzyski nawet w nazwach własnych tłumaczy się na "Holy Cross"

Najlepszym przykładem: Holy Cross Voivodeship https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%9Awi%C4%99tokrzyskie_Voivodeship
Yunkers (2024-04-01 16:19:20+00:00): "Holy Cross" to bardzo rzadkie tłumaczenie nazwy "Świetokrzyskie". Większość źródeł zostawia to jednak po polsku. Wikipedia i większość źródeł również podają nazwę tego mostu jako Świętokrzyski, podobnie z ulicą. To tłumaczenie jest bardzo wątpliwe.
maraf24 (2024-04-01 16:34:02+00:00): @Alanantos: Wcale nie. Zalecana do stosowania jest nazwa "Świętokrzyskie Voivod[e]ship / Province".
A Wikipedia to nie jest dobre źródło dla nazw.
mueschel (2024-03-23 09:44:22+00:00): 

Hi and welcome to OSM!
I see that you added many tags like these:

edificio progettato = si
elementi identitari = /
servizi presenti = Bar
stato edificio = Buono
tipo di copertura = Piano
valore storico = no

In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please make sure that you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.

If you have questions, please feel free to ask in the forums!

PS: It looks like you're working in a group with other mappers. Please point your supervisor / group leader to our organized editing guidelines:
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
ivanbranco (2024-03-23 13:14:52+00:00): Ciao vcsen25, questo e altri tuoi changeset sono stati annullati per ripristinare la situazione precedente. La motivazione é che le linee guida per gli import ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ) e quelle per le modifiche di gruppo ( https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines ) non sono state rispettate. Per favore seguite le linee guida prima di procedere con ulteriori modifiche.
Glassman (2024-03-22 16:26:45+00:00): #TIP: We spell out street names in OSM - the reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you fix these two houses. Also - don't use a name unless there is actually a posted name on the house.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148924192
trial (2026-04-14 20:57:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1264565947#map=17/48.386329/-4.477744&layers=N
friche industrielle labourée (dés-imperméabilisation ou plus probablement pour éviter que les gens du voyage ne s'y installent à nouveau).