piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
HellMap (2025-01-12 12:41:47+00:00): Te vienkārši tāda sāļa stiga ;)

Bet, ups, jā, sand.
Dawid2849 (2024-07-31 15:23:55+00:00): Cześć! Skąd pochodzi numer telefonu (nie ma go na stronie) oraz czemu zmieniłeś link na mniej dokładny (odnośi się do marki, a nie do stacji)?
Mathias_ADAV (2024-08-02 15:20:56+00:00): Bonjour, les voies sur berges de Haubourdin sont fermé car la berge s'effondre à cet endroit et pour l'heure le problème n'est pas résolu : https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=757660853059149&set=pcb.757660919725809  Au moins que vous ayez d'autres informations ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-01 08:34:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1065351957/history - zostały po tym jakiekolwiek pozostałości w terenie?

jak tak to jakie?
JLZIMMERMANN (2025-05-28 07:29:47+00:00): Merci de ces contributions qui sont visibles ici
https://map.infos-reseaux.com/#11.37/44.1101/5.2829/H,Hy,L
Le Vaucluse a ainsi une belle couverture sur l'hydrographie.
openuserr (2024-08-03 03:20:00+00:00): 这里是二十一世纪大厦 ，不是医院
ivanbranco (2024-07-31 19:38:14+00:00): Hi Mormegil,

I wonder why you replaced subject:wikidata with memorial:subject:wikidata? subject:wikidata has 57927 uses, memorial:subject:wikidata only 47 and its wiki documentation page is proposed for deletion: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Amemorial%3Asubject%3Awikidata

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10077585008
why did you remove historic=memorial+memorial=plaque here?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11267614870/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11371591552/history
here you just removed the wiki tags without replacing them
Mormegil (2024-08-01 09:53:26+00:00): D’oh! I knew I should not use the iD editor… Thanks for checking!

memorial:subject:wikidata was the first thing proposed by iD, so I used it without checking; I don’t care either way (and I’d think I wasn’t replacing subject:wikidata with memorial:subject:wikidata; at least that wasn’t my intention, anyway). (But note that the wiki page is proposed for deletion only to move the real documentation page there; unfortunately, the wiki apparently has no active admins?)

The plaque… I have no idea what happened, I probably clicked somewhere in the iD editor… it definitely was not my intention. Errrm… now I tried it and can see what happened: If you have a node selected and want to select a different node, you need to click the X in the left pane, write/paste the node ID, and click the “node” button. If, instead, you click the < in the left pane, write/paste the node ID, and click the “node” button… you’ll remove all categorization from the selected node, changing it into generic “node”. UX fail, I’d say. (But obviously my fault as well.) I reverted it.

I don’t think a natural=tree can have a “subject” (what does that mean, anyway); similarly for tourism=attraction. But moving the wikidata to subject:wikidata was definitely an option. Keeping wikidata was not. :-)
ivanbranco (2024-08-01 10:11:34+00:00): The tree is a memorial tree (translated: Memorial lime tree dedicated to Peter Lipa), so I think the subject:wikidata=* fits. If not, it would still a good candidate for name:etymology:wikidata=* since the name is "Petrova lipa". But just deleting the tag is loss of information in my opinion.

For the other element, is difficult to tell since is just tourism=attraction, but for the same reason I wouldn't have touched it, and maybe asked the original mapper who added such tags, since they are still active.
silversurfer83 (2024-07-31 22:03:34+00:00): Moinsen :)

kleiner Hinweis zu dem gesperrten Bahnübergang:
An dem Wegenden, die jetzt nicht mehr über die Gleise führen (also dem noexit=yes), wäre vielleicht ein Hinweis in Form einer "note=*" für andere Mapper hilfreich, damit niemand auf die Idee kommt, die Verbindung vom Luftbild wieder einzuzeichnen. Dort ist leider nicht erkennbar, dass der Übergang möglicherweise gesperrt ist.

cheers
silversurfer83
user_10799485 (2024-08-01 03:42:16+00:00): Da kann und darf keiner rüber. Auch keine Fußgänger und Fahrradfahrer.
user_10799485 (2024-08-01 03:49:24+00:00): Das ist auch auf den ganz neuen Luftbildern im NRW-vDOP sehr gut zu erkennen, das da alles abgeriegelt ist.
silversurfer83 (2024-08-01 21:25:46+00:00): Alles klar. Danke für den Hinweis auf das vDOP. Hab das mal am noexit als note hinterlassen. Einfach als klarer Hinweis für alle anderen, die hier möglicherweise nur am PC vorbeikommen und sich wundern, warum hier die Straße aufgetrennt ist.

cheers
silversurfer83
EightMegs (2024-10-18 10:36:44+00:00): There are local government entities in the form of Charter Trustees. They're elected, raise a council tax precept and spend that on their respective boroughs. Their purpose is largely ceremonial, hence admin_level=10, but they still meet the definition of an administrative entity.
BCNorwich (2024-08-01 18:08:13+00:00): Duplicated sections of highways removed.
jbcharron (2024-07-31 19:48:34+00:00): Un layer -1 et un location underground pourrait être pas mal
Ca me semble pas pertinent d'être visible au même niveau que le reste du site :)
tykayn (2024-07-31 19:58:54+00:00): j'ai mis un level -2, c'est le plan du niveau moins 2, layer est plus adapté ?
jbcharron (2024-07-31 20:46:39+00:00): Tu peux garder le level, mais en tout cas c'est le tag layer qui définit comment ça va être rendu sur une carte par rapport aux autres objets.
Par exemple pour les lignes électriques souterraines on utilise layer=-1
tykayn (2024-08-01 13:02:23+00:00): ok j'ai mis layer=-2 comme ça quand quelqu'un fera le niveau -1 ce sera déjà bien placé.
eteb3 (2024-07-31 15:00:06+00:00): source = survey
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-07-31 17:43:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154661668 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some alleged fantasy mapping.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16521
ZeLonewolf (2024-07-31 16:15:13+00:00): Please stop further place node classification changes without discussing it with the community first.  There is an active discussion here:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/broad-undiscussed-new-england-place-name-reclassification/111201/45
ZeLonewolf (2024-07-31 16:18:12+00:00): Reverted unilateral change.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154658127
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-07-31 15:05:06+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 126001985.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 04:18:55+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164839842
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-31 15:30:24+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4422911480
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/649432329

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
0ks (2024-08-01 07:31:08+00:00): برای اضافه کردن فروشگاه خود روی نقشه باید یک نقطه Drugstore جدید ثبت کنید، در حال حاضر شما نقطه‌ای از خیابان را به نام فروشگاه خود نام گذاری کردید
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154655316
Frans S (2024-08-03 12:34:39+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark. When you see a white splashing spot, at the size of a building, It is mostly a building, where the sun reflexes on the metal roof.
Best regards
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-07-31 17:43:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154661668 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some alleged fantasy mapping.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16521
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-07-31 15:32:52+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 154519091, 154532704.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-07-31 17:43:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154661668 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some alleged fantasy mapping.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16521
BCNorwich (2024-07-31 15:43:05+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

OSM is a live worldwide database, fiction is not welcome here. Please stop adding fiction and revert the fiction you've already added.

Regards Bernard.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-07-31 17:43:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154661668 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some alleged fantasy mapping.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16521
HellMap (2024-07-31 20:34:17+00:00): Hello,

It seems this edit is replacing tagging that specifies repairs are for tyres with a generic `repair` tag, i.e. `tyres:repair=yes` (previously `repair=tyres`) to `repair=yes`. This has lost information about tyre repair and made it imply that the shops offer general repairs.

Can you please double check and fix.

See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154450326 which seems to have changed the same nodes recently.
HellMap (2024-08-03 10:24:35+00:00): Can you please take a look at your change and fix it as necessary?
SomeoneElse (2024-08-05 19:00:14+00:00): @Nordpfeil was this mechanical edit discussed anywhere?
SomeoneElse (2024-08-05 19:00:19+00:00): @Nordpfeil wurde diese mechanische Bearbeitung irgendwo besprochen?
Nordpfeil (2024-08-08 19:27:38+00:00): For me the definition in the Wiki is clear:
repair=yes 	
Repair service for any goods that belong to the category of goods sold in the shop. 
So the shop is only selling tyres, there is no risk of such misinterpretation
HellMap (2024-08-08 19:52:24+00:00): This also changed it for `shop=car_repair` and `shop=car_parts`, which is not only tyres.
Nordpfeil (2024-08-09 07:38:59+00:00): Unfortunately I did not see that. 
I will try to reverse it.
user_5359 (2024-08-09 16:08:59+00:00): Revertiert auf Bitten vom Originalautor Nordpfeil mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155030566

Reverted at the request of the original author Nordpfeil with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155030566
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-07-31 17:43:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154661668 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some alleged fantasy mapping.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16521
eggie (2024-07-31 20:11:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Syl (2024-08-01 15:38:37+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai supprimé la description publicitaire, ça n'a pas sa place dans OpenStreetMap.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-07-31 17:43:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154661668 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some alleged fantasy mapping.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16521
BCNorwich (2024-08-01 07:21:39+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your contribution to OSM is much appreciated, but, it contains many problems. There are 16 highway warnings given above which should be corrected. 

If you could restrict the number of edits in any uploaded changeset to about 10 then it would be much easier for you or any other mapper to see any problems. Correcting these problems would then be easier for everyone.

I've removed a couple of duplicated highways. Also properly joined several other disconnected or crossing paths. I've unjoine several highways from area outlines as per OSM practice. I've amended many vehicle tags.

You tagged the path way:1253004962 as no public access, but this path is part of the route relation King Charles III England Coast Path: Cleveleys to Liverpool. I've removed the access restrictions and tagged it foot=yes. If this path is not now accessible then the route relation should be amended.

Regards Bernard.
NT Formby paths (2024-08-01 08:28:34+00:00): Hi Bernard,

Thank you for that, I'll correct anything I incorrectly changed today. Due to coastal change some paths have disappeared/overgrown etc but my mistake with the English Coastal Path, I was trying to avoid changing that one, just the others around it.

Cheers
mcliquid (2024-07-31 16:29:31+00:00): Der Name ist hier Biotoi GmbH aber die Webseite lautet eco2heat.com? Passt das zusammen? Eco2Heat ist in der Hausnummer 8, die ist gegenüber vom Morath. BioToi ist in der 23, die ist südlich davon. Schaust du nochmal drüber?
mcliquid (2024-07-31 16:30:27+00:00): Ich hab alle Werte mit "???" entfernt. Das gaukelt ja allen Tools nur vor, dass da was sinnvolles gesetzt ist, obwohl es das gar nicht ist :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-07-31 17:43:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154661668 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some alleged fantasy mapping.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16521
joost schouppe (2024-07-31 16:37:33+00:00): Sie haben einige Wege und sogar Hecken und die Landnutzung ausradiert. Nach Ihrer Beschreibung scheint das nicht die Absicht zu sein. Ich habe daher Ihre Bearbeitung rückgängig gemacht. Wenn Sie angeben können, welche Wege konkret welche Zugangsbeschränkungen haben, werde ich die Anpassung gerne für Sie vornehmen.
Sie können auch einfach auf ein Segment im Editor klicken und dann zusätzliche Zugangsbedingungen hinzufügen.
felipeeugenio (2024-07-31 18:08:22+00:00): Hola
Quizás no me expliqué bien. 

En vez de name= usar ref= para ese código.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154657844
felipeeugenio (2024-07-31 18:14:01+00:00): Hola. En lineas generales, un parque es un área verde para el esparcimiento. tiene que tener una intención de parque. de que vayan las familias y uno se pueda quedar ahí. El estándar del parque importa, pero es secundario.
Para pedazos pequeños de pasto con algunos árboles mejor usar grass y agregar los árboles si quieres, pero hay algunos que agregas que no son parques. Son solo una pequeña área verde.
los recreational_ground son algo mas complejo y no se usan mucho en Chile. personalmente no sabría decirte cual es la diferencia con un park. 
Por favor ingresar al chat para conversar mejor.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154657844
dypa (2024-08-06 16:24:51+00:00): При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra

Пожалуйста при внесении следующих правок используйте теги (Размеченный (нерегулируемый) пешеходный переход)
crossing=uncontrolled
crossing:markings=zebra

Заранее спасибо!
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-31 22:34:39+00:00): When adding buildings in OSM, please try to somewhat follow the outline of the building.
fortera_au (2024-07-31 22:53:06+00:00): I'm not sure is sports centre is the best tag for this, I'd probably take tourism=Sports out, but landuse=recreation_ground is either more appropriate, or should be replaced by something else, since it's closer to a park that contains several facilities, some being sports.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154658202
alexnder (2024-08-06 04:57:33+00:00): Nu se folosește `roundabout=yes`, ci `junction=roundabout` .
Rrich1974 (2024-08-06 08:50:10+00:00): vad ca cercul e facut din 4 sferturi, nu trebuia sa fie doar un singur cerc? 
eu am intervenit la intersectia asta dupa ce am vazut ca, atunci cand am trecut pe acilo, navigatia nu m-a avertizat de sens giratoriu.
Rrich1974 (2024-08-06 08:52:15+00:00): aaaaa, vad ca cineva a facut deja modificari, merci!
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-31 22:33:15+00:00): When adding buildings, please use "Q" to square them.
BCNorwich (2024-07-31 18:41:26+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If the road is open then the access=no tag should also be removed from all sections. It looks open to me but I'm not local so I can't verify that.

Regards Bernard.
Smifff (2024-07-31 22:14:11+00:00): I am unfamiliar with the process and the software, so not sure what you are talking about. If something is not right then please amend my fix I have done.
I live next to this road and am unable to use apps that use OpenStreetMap due to this change, hence me trying to fix it. The road was closed for about a week, months ago.
BCNorwich (2024-08-01 06:10:39+00:00): Hello Smifff, Just to let you know I've removed all restriction tags so the road should soon be routable in OSM. I've also tagged the priority over the narrow bridge.

Regards Bernard.
Powertoolsgb (2025-12-15 19:59:28+00:00): This is not Fox Way, it is Turner Way
5m4u9 (2024-08-01 03:34:15+00:00): Hola, en esta tu edición vi un error relativamente frecuente.

Escogiste la categoría "edificio escolar" en lugar de "terreno de escuela" para el área. los edificios escolar estan dentro de los terrenos escolares, pueden ser varios.

En Bolivia casi no existen edificios escolares que se construyen en todo el terreno.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-14 17:19:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304887308/history - was it really supposed to be a tree row?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-14 17:26:34+00:00): or is " campo de futebol" a soccer playing field?
WilliamHarrison (2024-07-31 18:41:58+00:00): Hello, is the roundabout only 1 lane?
Piagno (2024-07-31 22:23:29+00:00): Hi, I don't know. I just removed the construction values from the existing roundabout.
user_18023081 (2025-06-13 13:37:33+00:00): Are you sure that tree is 10km high?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12085586997
eggie (2024-07-31 20:08:44+00:00): Dag nitroN7  Probeer direct bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnodes

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-07-31 20:11:17+00:00): La Fucina is at the same address.. Is that still there,

Format postcode without space in OSM.

Greetz,
eggie
nitroN7 (2024-08-01 09:01:25+00:00): La Fucina no longer exists on that location, based on personal observation. Also, their website (lafucina.nl) used to contain a page for their Javastraat and Bloemenmarkt location (see archive.org) but now only the other remains.

I deleted the business, and then added the new business at that location (Cafe Bloemenmarkt) to the adress. Am I supposed to change the business node directly instead of deleting it?

Thanks for the postcode formatting tip! :)
eggie (2024-08-01 09:41:31+00:00): Hoi...   La Fucina is de originele BAG adresnode. Deze kun je beter behouden.
Ik zal je nieuw info samenvoegen met die adresnode.
Goed om te weten dat de BAG adesnodes directe import zijn vanuit het Kadaster (BAG import)

Mapse
eggie
mvolkhart (2024-08-30 02:14:00+00:00): @jsarafan I've not seen highway=path get used to route through buildings in this way before - is there a wiki article or something I can learn more about this on? It looks like other mapping schemes exist to address this sort of a route - perhaps more additional data is needed on the way? https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/61025/pragmatic-single-level-indoor-paths

Also, there is a separate route that takes visitors down the steps next to the visitor center and across the parking lot. We could connect the Cedar Creek Trail directly to the parking lot ways to help routing software connect the paths.
jsarafan (2024-08-30 16:19:43+00:00): Hi @mvolkhart! Thanks so much for directing my attention to that thread! I've mostly made/ edited trails and roads outside so I appreciate the feedback and will make those changes/ add additional tags to the path. I also agree that we should add the outdoor path via the stairs. Please let me know if you would like to take care of it, or if you'd like me to :) Thanks again!
mvolkhart (2024-08-30 16:40:20+00:00): @jsarafan if you could add it that'd be great! Thanks!
Dani CS (2024-08-01 08:56:00+00:00): I'll delete this drinking water with obvious wrong coordinates (0, 0).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-07-31 17:43:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154661668 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some alleged fantasy mapping.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16521
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-07-31 17:43:50+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 154654372, 154655311, 154655591, 154655814, 154655999, 154656302, 154656349, 154656496, 154656784, 154657549, 154657900, 154659523, 154659939, 154660172, 154660219, 154660471, 154660887, 154661239.
rskedgell (2024-07-31 23:18:02+00:00): They didn't take the hint.
sembelst134 (2026-02-12 00:10:30+00:00): Vermutlich dreifach falsch eingetragen...
- auf aktuellen mapillary Aufnahmen sieht man, dass sich an der Stelle nichts befindet
- weiter südlich das ist eine Zollkontrollanlage, sollte es zum wiederholten Mal damit verwechselt worden sein 
- ein echter Blitzer umfasst eine Relation zum korrekten Straßenbezug, siehe Wiki
Sosha1996 (2025-02-05 21:43:42+00:00): با درود
لطفا تا زمانی که به تسلط کافی دست پیدا نکردید از ویرایش مرز‌ها خودداری کنید.
با تشکر.
masod92 (2025-02-06 05:20:50+00:00): درود. من اطلاعات رو آپدیت کردم. خیلی از اطلاعات یا قدیمی بود یا اشتباه! مثل جمعیت.
Sosha1996 (2025-02-07 21:04:32+00:00): با درود مجدد
ممنون از پاسخگویی و مشارکت شما. 
چند نکته وجود داره اول این که فرمتی که برای مشخص کردن جمعیت استفاده می‌کنید باید بدون کاما باشه. 
یعنی مثلا 456000

مورد دوم که اشتباه کرده بودید، تغییر مقدار فیلد ادمین لول بود. منظور منم از تسلط،‌ توی این مورد بود وگرنه بقیه ویرایش‌های شما بنظر مشکلی نداره.

بازم ممنون از مشارکت شما
masod92 (2025-02-08 07:27:00+00:00): ممنونم. یک مشکل اساسی تو این مرزبندی و نقشه مربوط به بوکان هست. اینکه محدود شهری مشخص نشده! مثلا ما تو ویکی پدیا از همین دیتا برای بوکان استفاده کردیم اما محدوده شهر مشخص نیست! در حالی که برای شهرهای همجوار مثل مهاباد مشخصه! بعد قبل تغییرات من، خیلی از قسمت ها رو دیدم بعنوان روستا مشخص کردند! اجمعیت شهر بوکان(فقط شهرش) بالای 230 هزار نفر هست براساس دیتای خود شهرداری در سال 1402. نمیدونم کسی از شهر ما در این پروژه ها مشارکت نمیکنه یا چرا اینطوری هست 
https://gitionline.ir/%D8%B1%D9%81%D8%B9-%D8%AA%D9%86%D8%B4-%D8%A2%D8%A8-%D8%B4%D9%87%D8%B1%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%A8%D9%88%DA%A9%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%AA%D8%A7-%DA%86%D9%87%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%87-%D8%AF%DB%8C%DA%AF/
Sosha1996 (2025-02-08 08:06:41+00:00): احتمالا همونطور که خودتون حدس میزنید، مشارکت‌کننده‌ای از بوکان یا اطراف در پروژه مشارکت ندارن و به همین علت نقشه منطقه شما آپدیت و تکمیل نیست.
اگر تمایل به مشارکت بیشتر دارید، لطفا به گروه کاربری او‌اس‌ام ایران در تلگرام بپیوندید:
https://t.me/OpenStreetMap
Khidistavi (2024-08-03 07:00:24+00:00): Reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154668807
Khidistavi (2024-08-03 07:00:34+00:00): Reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154668807
mga_geo (2024-08-20 09:02:52+00:00): Bonjour,
Il n'y a aucun arrêt de bus sur la rue des Loges au sud-ouest de la ligne de chemin de fer, pour https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/538206182/history#map=19/48.084600/-1.627505 l'ajout de l'attribut ref:FR:STAR n'est pas justifié et pour bus=yes cela n'est pas justifié en PTv2.
Je vous laisse corriger.
Marc
rskedgell (2024-08-05 13:17:30+00:00): Might it be better to use proposed:railway=rail rather than railway=proposed for this?

Also, is there an OpenStreetMap licence-compatible source for this proposal?
BCNorwich (2024-07-31 18:32:56+00:00): Fiction reverted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-08-01 07:47:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154680287 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16522
Vas111 (2024-08-01 14:47:31+00:00): Hello there,
I noticed you have been mapping linear footways as pedestrian areas en masse. If you want to add the area of a footway you should tag it as area:highway=footway, as area=yes + highway=pedestrian is reserved for pedestrian areas such as squares or plazas. Not only is it incorrect mapping, it also poses problems for routers as they usually plan a route around the edge of the area instead of through the middle as with a simple linear way.