piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ToniE (2023-03-01 11:41:04+00:00): Servus,

das ist "mapping for the renderer" und wird nicht gerne gesehen.

Bitte rückgängig machen und den/die Renderer ändern - das ist die korrekte Vorgehensweise.

Gruß
Toni
Andreas Binder (2023-03-24 21:12:45+00:00): @ToniE: Habe den Mapper auch hier aufmerksam gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3584432
Glassman (2023-03-02 18:48:58+00:00): #TIP: remove old tags that don't fit the new business, in this case the brand and brand:wikipedia. Can you fix this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133149720
hdevine825 (2023-03-01 02:30:12+00:00): Not sure what kind of change you were trying to make here. You removed all of the address details and name. Even if the store is closed the address details should stay for when something replaces it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133149782
Enock4seth (2023-05-20 21:52:16+00:00): roads such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150302118#map=17/6.63657/-1.44363 leads nowhere and definitely not highway=unclassified. highway=track represents them more
hdevine825 (2023-03-01 02:24:11+00:00): The driveway being private is not a reason to delete it. The way can be split and have an access=private tag added where it becomes private.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133149801
wille (2023-03-10 11:21:49+00:00): Edição revertida por vandalismo. Caso você continue a apagar nomes corretos e colocar nomes falsos em via, você será denunciado para o Data Working Group e poderá ter a conta suspensa.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133150163
user_18541240 (2023-03-10 12:39:03+00:00): Olá, Bom dia! O nome vai continuar incorreto porque não vou mais refazer o que foi vandalizado !
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133150163
user_18522818 (2023-03-10 12:46:08+00:00): Bom dia, moro no Imbuí e passo todo dia por esse viaduto. Também não vou refazer o que foi desfeito pelo wille como vandalismo. Procurem se informa no local antes de ficar publicando porque sei que estou certo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133150163
canfe (2023-12-21 11:46:01+00:00): Ma l'aiuola ha davvero il nome Rotonda del Cervo?
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-01 02:39:14+00:00): Again, just about every building needs to be squared
skyper (2023-03-06 21:11:46+00:00): Hallo eutill,
hier hast Du wohl mit unvollständigen Daten gearbeitet und vor dem Aufteilen der Straße vergessen alle Eltern (Relationen) zu laden (Strg+Alt+D). Bitte achte in Zukunft darauf, denn es bringt herzlich wenig, wenn Du eine Relation korrigierst aber 34 weiter beschädigst. Habe es mittlerweile korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133379696

Auch war das `cycleway:both=no` falsch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150307948
Bitte achte auch auf die Tags bei zukünftigen Änderungen, danke.

Grüße,
skyper

P.S.: Eventuell solltest Du JOSM mal updaten.
eutill (2023-03-07 17:22:49+00:00): Hallo skyper,
vielen Dank für Deine hilfreichen und wohlwollenden Bemerkungen. Ich werde in Zukunft darauf achten, dass mir so etwas nicht mehr passiert. Danke für das Rückgängigmachen meiner Beschädigungen.
JOSM wird sogleich geupdatet.

Grüße,
eutill
skyper (2023-03-14 13:35:05+00:00): Hi eutill,
wir machen alle mal Fehler. Das wichtigste ist, dass wir daraus lernen.
Viel Spaß beim Mappen und viele Grüße,
skyper
Note_Fixer (2023-03-01 00:38:23+00:00): see, 133103968
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-01 01:33:43+00:00): "q" can be used to square the buildings.
Note_Fixer (2023-03-01 00:38:49+00:00): see; 133103968
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-01 02:40:27+00:00): & again - squaring please.
MxxCon (2023-03-06 10:00:35+00:00): Hello.
If you are going to delete sliplanes, then you must also update total lane count for the remaining way and update turn lane restrictions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133151435
MxxCon (2023-03-06 10:00:50+00:00): Hello.
If you are going to delete sliplanes, then you must also update total lane count for the remaining way and update turn lane restrictions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133151509
MxxCon (2023-03-06 10:00:23+00:00): Hello.
If you are going to delete sliplanes, then you must also update total lane count for the remaining way and update turn lane restrictions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133151520
adrianojbr (2023-04-09 21:56:31+00:00): Olá!

Lembro que o alinhamento de vias deve ser feito com base em traços de GPS, conforme: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_aerial_imagery#Frequent_mistakes.

Nessa região as imagens da Maxar e da Bing estão bem desalinhadas com base nos traços da Strava. As imagens da Esri parecem estar um pouco mais alinhadas.

Além disso, é importante alinhar os elementos em volta a fim de manter o alinhamento relativo entre eles.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133151732
MountKazbek (2023-04-11 06:34:01+00:00): Hello adrianojbr, returning to the area I can see that Strava does align more with Esri World imagery (Clarity) Beta. Thank you for setting the alignment back. Have a good day!
mcliquid (2023-03-01 07:36:28+00:00): Please split your edits in multiple uploads when you switch the continent, country, state or even city!
MxxCon (2023-03-01 04:18:02+00:00): So then why did you delete this feature?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133152060
GeorgeJia (2023-03-01 18:05:52+00:00): There is only one narrow slope on the east side rather a whole big circle slope, so that is why I delete the line in the west
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 10:59:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
Note_Fixer (2023-03-01 13:20:04+00:00): rain water ditch behind buildings
Supaplex (2023-05-06 11:36:05+00:00): 為何移除Wikidata連結？
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133152344
jpennycook (2023-03-01 09:10:54+00:00): Hi!

You've set Rookes Way to motor_vehicle=permissive.  Perhaps you meant another tag - permissive means that anyone is allowed to use it, but without there being a legal right of way, but it looks like the only motor vehicles allowed to use this bit of road are buses, already covered by the bus=yes tag, and the motor_vehicle=permissive tag you added overrides the vehicle=no tag that was already present for all vehicles except non-motorised vehicles (but not for buses due to the explicit bus=yes tag).

You might find the following useful:-

* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dpermissive
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Land-based_transportation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#List_of_possible_values
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#United_Kingdom
wille (2023-03-01 12:38:31+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! Em nomes, você pode escrever da/de/do em minúsculas, exemplo "Fundação Cultural do Estado da Bahia". Siglas devem estar na tag short_name
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133152786
DUGA (2023-12-31 19:43:11+00:00): Please don’t add things at OpenStreetMap when you don’t even know if they exist or not, that’s straightforward vandalism.

(These phones exist)
m86 (2023-12-31 19:51:16+00:00): I would imagine it was more or less a recommendation to double-check - I believe they were visible on street-side imagery, though, conceivably they could have been removed after (I would appraise that as unlikely) or were placed slightly off from locations imputed from front-facing street-view.
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-01 06:48:27+00:00): Reverted changeset in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133158277

If it exists, it should still be mapped, albeit, with the correct tags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133152870
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-01 11:15:05+00:00): Here's a thought. Add the tag instead of deleting.
pitscheplatsch (2023-03-04 11:50:18+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133153207
adrianojbr (2023-04-09 22:04:13+00:00): Olá, DoloresReis!

Favor cuidar para não sobrepor elementos. Nesse caso o edifício foi desenhado indevidamente sobre a Rua Miguel Matte!

Devido a altura dos edifícios normalmente há uma distorção da sua posição nas imagens de satélite. Para tanto, basta alternar entre as imagens de fundo disponíveis. O edifício que você desenhou com base nas imagens do Bing já estava desenhado em: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/913379024/, o que fica claro acompanhando a linha do edifício até a base e comparando com a imagem da Maxar.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133153201
pitscheplatsch (2023-03-04 11:50:12+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133153133
hdevine825 (2023-03-01 15:08:43+00:00): The outline of this building looks pretty far off from the actual shape of the building.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133153454
hdevine825 (2023-03-01 03:48:24+00:00): These buildings could be improved by squaring the corners. You can use the Q key to do this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133153515
hdevine825 (2023-03-01 03:31:38+00:00): A couple issues here: you didn't fully close the way back to it's starting point. In addition it should be tagged with building=house.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133153756
hdevine825 (2023-03-01 03:44:21+00:00): These should be traced with more detail. See this as a nearby example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/857343457
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133153925
Glassman (2023-03-02 18:54:57+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

I reverted this changeset. The building was so poorly drawn that it would have taken more time to fix. I'm guessing you are taking a GIS course. If you an prospective employer reviews your work do you think they would hire you?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133154122
Glassman (2023-03-02 18:57:18+00:00): This is a poorly drawn building. I have reverted this edit.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133154250
mueschel (2023-03-05 11:01:52+00:00): Hi,
the 'historic' prefix is only used for historically relevant objects, like castles or monuments. Tags that are just not applicable any more do get another prefix, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Also, there can't be a date in the middle of a key - You can use end_date instead.
UndueMarmot (2023-03-19 11:12:56+00:00): slr but yeah, I realized. I was thinking of `was:` rather than `historic:` for what I was using it for.

Although I have discovered a wiki article https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Order_of_key_parts that implies you could put a date at the end of a key.
hdevine825 (2023-03-01 16:21:52+00:00): When mapping crossings they should have a node connecting with the street way where they cross.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133154408
jmarchon (2023-03-01 04:49:41+00:00): Hello,
Thank you for your contributions!
May I ask why you deleted this segment?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133154448
mrahulw (2023-03-01 08:55:34+00:00): Hello jmarchon,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset. I deleted the road because it appears impassable in Esri World Imagery and is also confirmed in Streetview.If you are a local and find some recent resources, let us know if there is any changes that needs to be made. Always happy to learn more from you.

Regards,
mrahulw
jmarchon (2023-03-01 16:13:46+00:00): Thank you for your answer. I agree now with this segment being deleted.
Udarian (2023-03-01 04:03:05+00:00): As a note:
the latest imagery from what I can tell is the Miami-Dade County Orthoimagery (Latest).

Also there is still allot of work to be done in the area
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-01 06:41:50+00:00): Please use more detailed changeset comments.  What did you change and why?
felipeeugenio (2023-03-01 12:17:34+00:00): Brasilia y Lo Mena también están acá como parte de una calle
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133154766
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
ZinaidaZ (2023-03-01 07:43:36+00:00): Добрый день! Подскажите, пожалуйста, на основании какого нормативного документа Вы добавляете name:en в таком виде?

С уважением,
Зинаида

Hello,
Could you please tell what kind of official document you use for adding name:en in such a way?

Kind regards,
Zinaida
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-01 06:43:45+00:00): Please use better/more detailed changeset comments.  What did you change and why?

Read here for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
angys (2023-03-01 05:02:47+00:00): Large box due to wrongly drag a road in Pulau Sebang🥲
wille (2023-03-01 12:31:34+00:00): Thanks for the edit! Could you check in your imagery if this link yet exists? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/555793567
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133155734
SarygamyshLake (2023-03-03 08:48:36+00:00): Hello, wille thank you for reaching out. The area is still under construction and it is not complete at this time.
emersonveenstra (2023-03-01 12:17:24+00:00): Once again:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318517258#map=15/35.5916/-112.0520 is not a ford for the entire length of the way, please fix it

You mispelled 'natural' in the tags of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47266256 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47266258, please fix those too
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
Warin61 (2023-03-01 22:27:58+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM!
Thanks for the initial contribution. Looks like Maxar imagery is more upto date than Bing in this area. 
You certainly have taken the bull by the horns! A few hints? Keep it simple, Do small bits at a time - map the building by itself ... then separately map a footpath.. this makes it easier to follow what the warning are talking about as you will have less of them to understand.
MurdochMaps (2023-03-02 05:42:40+00:00): Thanks Warin, I'd hoped we could upload the changes from DWG format but MazeMaps told me that wasn't possible (after a month of suggesting otherwise), so I was just keen to get the changes up as soon as possible since the building is now open.
MurdochMaps (2023-03-02 05:43:29+00:00): So I can select to draft up the changes using the alternative Maxar imagery as underlay?
Warin61 (2023-03-02 08:25:23+00:00): The changes you made with this changeset are already in OSM .. 

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133155781

On the left section, if you scroll down, are the individual elements .. eg. building, paths etc .. you can click on these to see them. OSM is very powerful and quick to get new stuff up .. slower with changes to old stuff. 

Note .. where a path enters a building there should be a node tagged entrance.. there are a number of other 'issues' e.g. the loop road .. a fragment exists by it self ... and the bit that goes out to the external road is probably a highway=service, service=driveway???
V-Li (2023-03-01 15:48:15+00:00): Danke für deinen Beitrag.  Bitte Öffnungszeiten nicht beliebig eintragen, sie folgen einem Schema, siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

Die Seite https://www.webmapping.cyou/WebToOSMOH/ ist sehr hilfreich beim Erzeugen des richtigen Formats.  Hier habe ich es schon korrigiert.
pesec (2023-03-01 09:53:50+00:00): Добрый день.
Данным пакетом правок вы дополнили новые улицы. Согласно правилам построения дорожного графа улицы должны соединяться в общую сеть и сообщаться между собой. Вы создали изолят, не соединённый с другими дорогами. Данные улицы отсутствуют по факту и появились только в рамках Генплана города. Подобный тип объекта должен обозначаться как highway=proposed
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway=proposed
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-13 08:41:19+00:00): 

Hello! What you meant by building name = biyosavunma that was added in this edit?

Is it name of building in which this office is located?

If that is not a building name - what you wanted express by this tagging?
barlok2023 (2024-05-13 10:47:20+00:00): There are many buildings in Technocity.
There is more than one office in this building located in Teknokent.
While Teknokent gives a door number to the buildings, it also gives a name. "biyosavunma" is a name given to this building, not a company name.
GerdP (2023-07-31 14:44:22+00:00): Moin!
Wegen RB Süd:
Das müsste die "Bissendorfer Rundtour Süd" sein:
https://www.melle.info/portal/seiten/rad-fahren-919000716-20301.html
Glassman (2023-03-02 19:07:29+00:00): Is this a HOT task?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133157674
watmildon (2024-12-12 01:11:29+00:00): Lovely work here!
streckenkundler (2023-03-01 17:43:12+00:00): Hei, 

bitte Wiki beachten: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area

NSG kann/sollte in short_protection_title, bei reinen NSG's fehlt hier protect_class=4. Hat das NSG auch Totalreservate/Naturentwicklungsgebiete, bekommen diese protect_class=1

Nach meiner Erfahrung ist leisure=nature_reserve mittlerweile vollständig obsolet.

streckenkundler
jcr83 (2023-03-02 17:50:52+00:00): Merci pour la précision.
felipeeugenio (2023-03-01 12:16:42+00:00): Hola
ojo con pegar las poblaciones o barrios a las calles. Algunas las estás dejando como si fueran parte de la vía. (Villa Las Palmeras y Población Mi Viñita en este changeset)
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133158634
wille (2023-03-01 12:14:34+00:00): Olá! Obrigado pela edição. Algumas correções aqui: Selecionando um elemento e pressionando a tecla Q, os ângulos vão ser ajustados para 90º. Se você desenhou a área do condomínio e o edifício, pode deixar o nome apenas na área do condomínio. Assim evitamos dois elementos com o mesmo nome.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133159369
literan (2023-03-01 21:46:37+00:00): рекламный текст почищу. не надо.
literan (2023-03-01 22:20:21+00:00): камеры должны быть частью дороги, а не лежать рядом с ней
user_11609320 (2023-03-01 07:49:14+00:00): it is part of the resort: https://www.reviewjournal.com/homes/real-estate-millions/pahrump-home-with-a-race-track-was-designed-with-thrill-seekers-in-mind-photos/
SomeoneElse (2023-09-01 12:40:14+00:00): I'm guessing that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149599738 et al are at best service roads here?
pyrog (2023-07-16 17:24:49+00:00): cf. remarques précédentes.
là aussi je corrige.
GrabSG_sitiamirah (2023-03-01 08:24:40+00:00): Also updated parking aisle to footpath
Jordi MF (2023-03-05 17:04:51+00:00): Hola de nou,
T'informe que les zones com la que has mapejat com a parc (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41904858) són considerardes zones de jocs infantils encara que en el nostre idioma les anomenem "parc". Per tant, l'etiqueta correcta és leisure=playground. Ho corregisc.
Srdjan023 (2023-03-01 21:14:19+00:00): Kada menjas naziv ulice gledaj ta promeniš i  ref:RS:ulica tag da se slaže se tom ulicom napravićeš zbrku kada se bude uvozilo iz adresnog registra.
Jordi MF (2023-03-05 17:50:09+00:00): En este cas, he mapejat tots els boscos que existeixen. He eliminat el gran parc que havies mapejat perquè esta zona no està catalogada així. A més a més, esta zona està dividida en dos partides, la de Borrús al nord, i la de la Joquera al sud-est. Així que, encara que la gent de Borriol parle de "donar una volta per la Joquera" quan camina per esta zona, realment, es tracta de dos partides. Així que, a més, he afegit el node amb el nom de "la Joquera" com a partida (place=locality). La partida de la Joquera està ocupada, majoritàriament per la mina.