piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2023-09-21 05:56:22+00:00): Hi empty_child,
this changeset has created several errors regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=44.76987&lat=41.68576&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141486460

Can you please fix this?

I am wondering how this could happen, even you are using JOSM. May be you like to educate yourself about how to use its internal validator:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Validator

Kind regards
Guido
empty_child (2023-09-21 07:06:31+00:00): Hello Guido,
Thanks for your feedback. It's strange, but I didn't receive any validator's issue (except Wikipedia ones). I usually close most of them. I made a note and close problems ASAP
empty_child (2023-09-21 08:10:15+00:00): Fixed (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141546082)
gscholz (2023-09-21 08:24:05+00:00): Thanks for your quick response.
Guido
dypa (2023-09-20 11:23:33+00:00): а разве у линии 1145066041 в районе ям-ижоры появился асфальт?
Strubbl (2024-03-16 22:44:14+00:00): Noch ein Nicht-Verschlucken deines Editors. Nehm ich in die Ignorierliste auf. Danke!
dmfr (2024-09-11 18:55:28+00:00): Olá Pedro! A way 1209205971 não tem tags... se não souberes que tags querias pôr, é melhor eliminares essa way.
PedroMTG13 (2024-09-12 17:37:12+00:00): Eliminado
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-19 21:40:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/788185320

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-11 13:10:46+00:00): poprawiono
Peter Newman (2025-05-18 18:59:32+00:00): I've added a second booth given there are actually a pair there.

Can you remember where the ref on the booth is in terms of which one is which?

I wonder if the ref field would be a better bet for tagging them?:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref
Glassman (2023-09-20 21:46:07+00:00): Some suggestions - save and upload your contributions before moving to a distant location.

OSM doesn't use descriptive names. I've removed the names from the couple of buildings you added.

Square buildings by just selecting the outline then type a "q" - a simple step to improve the look of the building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141487278
CurlingMan13 (2023-09-21 16:44:56+00:00): Are all these road closures temporary or permanent?
amacmcgrann (2023-12-10 07:03:22+00:00): They were temporary, just fixed the last one. All reopened at this time.
CurlingMan13 (2023-09-19 23:37:53+00:00): I have mentioned this before....  Do NOT "lollipop" areas to create "holes".  Multi-polygon relations should be used instead.  I have cleaned it up for you.
bad_mapper (2023-09-20 12:32:02+00:00): Точно? Вчера был на месте)
ElliottPlack (2024-04-19 18:59:56+00:00): Hi Joseph, thanks for your work on highways around the region. At this time I don't think we can consider MD 210 a limited access motorway. Bicycle are still allowed and are encouraged on the shoulders via the recent installation of several bicycle-only access points:

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1273822411
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1273822413
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1273822426

Although I don't think I would enjoy bike riding around on 210 near the beltway, it is allowed. Pedestrians are also permitted on the shoulders. Would you be opposed to rolling this back to Trunk?
Joseph R P (2024-04-19 21:34:16+00:00): I'll go ahead and do that. I've been removing these sort of short controlled-access sections of highways tagged as motorways as of recent. Considering the addition of bicycle infrastructure, its relatively low speed limit (45 mph), its short length, and a myriad of other non-freeway characteristics, downgrading this section makes sense to me.
ElliottPlack (2024-04-20 02:27:53+00:00): Very good, thank you! I see you've completed the edits. While you're at it, what are your thoughts on the motorway portions of MD 4 and MD 4, both in the vicinity just east of here. All of these routes serve as high volume connectors getting suburban commuters to DC and beyond. MD 4 does have some limited access sections but it currently looks to be an isolated motorway.
Joseph R P (2024-04-20 15:56:59+00:00): I think MD 4 and 5 make sense as motorways given their longer lengths, higher speeds, and bigger number of grade separation; their intentions appear to be to serve as freeways, as opposed to 210, which is rather a typical limited-access highway with a few interchanges in a row within a short distance. MD 4 currently is isolated from other freeways, but some upgrades are supposed to happen at the Suitland/Presidential intersection, turning it into an interchange at some point. Not sure whether that's supposed to remove the other signalized intersections, however. MD 5 seems to me to be a very good example of a non-interstate motorway spur, in where it has a freeway-to-freeway connection with another motorway (except with I 495 west to MD 5 north) as well as all the other requirements like a speed limit of at least 55, grade separations throughout its length, and a length indicating these aren't just grade separations consequentially adjacent but rather a proper freeway.

To me it is fine to have isolated motorways just as long as the highways being tagged as such are intended to be freeways as opposed to roads that look like freeways but have some sort of violation (bike/pedestrian infrastructure without grade separation, low speed limit, lack of median) or very short length.
Warin61 (2023-09-20 23:31:25+00:00): The name tag is for real names only. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Suggest you do more reading on the OSM wiki.
电子烟假 (2023-09-20 11:10:22+00:00): As a note, this changeset was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141495371

Thank you for allowing me to save other reviewers time under each changeset
Warin61 (2023-09-20 23:31:30+00:00): Test? 
If you want to 'test' there is a sandbox 'development server', use it - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing
电子烟假 (2023-09-20 11:14:00+00:00): As clearly visible pointed in https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/4531648296, changes in this and 141490477, 141489903 were fully reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141494445
电子烟假 (2023-09-20 11:51:50+00:00): I have to note in 17 changesets: this changeset was reverted fully in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141494445
Don't do that again, thanks.
电子烟假 (2023-09-20 11:54:09+00:00): This changeset was fully reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141491252
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-09-20 01:56:18+00:00): Note: 这种值都用标准值就好了，很容易在编辑器内前端映射成本地化的字符串，而且iD就是这么干的，又不是物种species写的都是拉丁学名
电子烟假 (2023-09-20 10:40:15+00:00): Right, in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141492405 this was reverted, the history of way 713953897 is so interested.
MxxCon (2023-09-20 02:40:50+00:00): So now it's was:barrier=kerb and barrier=kerb at the same time?🤣🫣
I fixed it.👍😆
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141490844
电子烟假 (2023-09-20 10:30:10+00:00): note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141494318 restored in there
Matt_ (2023-09-20 02:19:16+00:00): Left the wrong comment, Dam and lake were at wrong coords, I moved the tags to the correct places
电子烟假 (2023-09-20 10:38:36+00:00): As a marker, I must pointed out that this was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141492235 and that may save other reviewer's time.

You may already blocked me but I'll  asked another user reply this, you shouldn't make such a edit war like https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/425005575 you've made.
cserpell (2023-09-20 23:16:12+00:00): Por favor no llegar y copiar nombres de Street View.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141490974
SomeoneElse (2023-10-30 21:54:02+00:00): Tagging these as "amenity=parking" is somewhat unusual.  It's not unique - https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1CFs shows some in Brussels - but it's pretty unique in the UK.
It's probably worth discussing the best tag for these on https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb or (internationally) at c.osm.org .
ElectricDuck (2023-11-06 01:43:18+00:00): This is what I could extrapolate from the wiki (entirely aware this seems to be in flux), as well as seeing how other areas have done it. Did come across a few that are just amenity=scooter_rental, but these PoIs seem *very* old.

I will admit though, 100+ extra "Parking" PoIs suddenly appearing around the city has even slightly thrown me at times looking at it on other clients (even OsmAnd doesn't understand the syntax and seem to think they're just private parking spots for private vehicles).

Will bring it up though in the mailing list; thank you for the advice.
SomeoneElse (2023-12-13 00:54:20+00:00): There's actually a spectacular variety of tagging around the country so I've asked at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2023-December/031009.html .
SomeoneElse (2024-02-18 23:00:38+00:00): The feedback on the list has been that amenity=parking isn't the best option here - see e.g. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2023-December/031011.html and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2024-February/031140.html .
Other options used around the country include "escooter_rental" (the previous tag here), "scooter_parking", "small_electric_vehicle" and "kick-scooter_rental" (although I'm not convinced that last one is technically correct).
ElectricDuck (2024-04-09 23:10:42+00:00): While I'm still not a huge fan of amenity=escooter_rental, its clear this is the way forward in the UK. As such, I have corrected all the tags as of #149797372.

Forgive me taking forever too; I'd actually entirely forgotten about this discussion!
SomeoneElse (2024-04-09 23:13:51+00:00): Thanks - I think this does make more sense.
电子烟假 (2023-09-20 09:28:32+00:00): To reduce duplication of work by other DWG and maintainer mappers, as a marker, this changeset has been finally revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141494583
电子烟假 (2023-09-20 10:44:49+00:00): As a marker, this changeset has been **finally** revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141494583

(Yes, many serial tags removal was reverted in just one time, don't do those time wasting tricks, because it make no sense. Thank you)
Fischkopp0815 (2023-09-20 09:15:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363212708

Website funktioniert nicht. Bite prüfe den Link
电子烟假 (2023-09-20 09:25:47+00:00): To reduce duplication of work by other DWG and maintainer mappers, as a marker, this changeset has been revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141492405
Metzor (2023-09-20 14:28:05+00:00): Hi Natureandmountains,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) 

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
hocu (2024-11-24 09:05:13+00:00): Merhaba, katkınız için teşekkürler.

Bu büyük alanın (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1010247141) tamamını landuse=retail olarak etiketlemenizin özel bir nedeni var mı? Bu alanda çok zaman geçirdim, perakende satıcılar, ticari işletmeler ya da ofislerden çok konut olduğunu düşünüyorum. Bu alanın daha küçük parçalara ayrılıp, konut ağırlıklı bölümlerin landuse=residential ile etiketlenmesi daha doğru olur, siz ne düşünüyorsunuz?
MisturJoesturr (2024-11-24 14:36:48+00:00): Esenlik, ben yalnızca bazı yanlış çizilmiş sınırlarını düzelttim. Türkiye'de zoning olmadığı için böyle her şey bir arada. Dediğiniz gibi daha iyi olur.
hocu (2024-11-25 12:26:37+00:00): Tamam, fırsat bulunca bakacağım. Teşekkür ederim.
电子烟假 (2023-09-20 09:23:33+00:00): To reduce duplication of work by other DWG and maintainer mappers, as a marker, this changeset has been revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141492351
电子烟假 (2023-09-20 09:22:36+00:00): Done, please use language that actually used in osm element, so as a note, this changeset was reverted by me in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141503502
电子烟假 (2023-09-20 09:19:44+00:00): To reduce duplication of work by other DWG and maintainer mappers, as a marker, this changeset has been revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141494583
电子烟假 (2023-09-20 09:17:38+00:00): To reduce duplication of work by other DWG and maintainer mappers, as a marker, this changeset has been revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141494583
nevw (2023-09-20 06:40:26+00:00): This building is located on Barkly St. do you need to shift all the details to another building on Paisley St?
fixative_xyz (2023-09-20 22:39:06+00:00): As I stated in my edit, the shop moved to Paisley Street in 2022. It's on their Instagram if you scroll back to November 2022. The Barkly Street address is now a Vinnie's op shop.
nevw (2023-09-20 23:05:11+00:00): In that case you need to sift the Cheaper Buy Miles relevant tags on to the building that they occupy on Paisley St and add Vinnie op shop tags to the site on Barkly St.
nevw (2023-09-20 23:10:31+00:00): If you are not able to do this, select the correct building on Paisley St from openstreetmap and paste the url here and I will correct it remotely.
nevw (2023-09-22 08:43:16+00:00): no further response: 
fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141593629
CasGroenigen (2023-11-15 21:50:21+00:00): Hallo Dillen,
Hier heb je dit hele vlak gemarkeerd als een gebouw, maar het winkelcentrum is niet één groot gebouw. 
Is het goed als ik dit vlak verwijder en de tags name=Winkelcentrum Getsewoud
en operator:website=https://www.winkeleningetsewoud.nl/ verplaats naar het vlak van het handelsgebied?

Gr. Cas
Dillen GJ (2023-11-16 13:20:23+00:00): Ja hoor, normaal had ik verwezen naar de website van het winkelgebied maar die is (heb ik net gezien) in onderhoud…
Dillen GJ (2023-11-16 13:57:17+00:00): Ik had dat gedaan om het winkelgebied vindbaar te maken omdat:
1. een halte van MeerBus verwijst naar:
&
2. er voor het winkelgebied een infobord staat met plattegrond:
Winkelcentrum Getsewoud
Dillen GJ (2023-11-16 14:01:26+00:00): https://www.instantstreetview.com/@52.271443,4.620536,236.64h,-0.07p,2.33z,6KM68H0GAVbPQ1updZHFXQ
arjunaraoc (2024-01-06 01:25:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my updates https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145942005 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145941965
Happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141492729
arjunaraoc (2024-01-06 01:26:37+00:00): Please upload your nearby edits as separate changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141492729
arjunaraoc (2024-01-06 01:13:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
Check my improvements covering your edit and other's edits
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141493101
Frans S (2023-10-02 10:49:57+00:00): Hello. 
Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please don't cluster buildings and map it as 1 building. Try to map individual buildings. or add a courtyard in it where it is obvious,
Best regards and keep mapping
user_5359 (2023-09-20 06:21:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use the key building instead of building3. Probably the result of a small operating error in the editor used.
bharathvasi (2023-09-20 06:41:16+00:00): Building3 near highway
user_5359 (2023-09-20 06:57:08+00:00): Sorry, I didn't quite understand your answer. Did I correct something wrong?
arjunaraoc (2024-01-04 09:31:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my updates: 
Changeset 145871609: cleanp geometry
Changeset 145871362: cleanp geometry
Changeset 145871316: cleanp geometry
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141493471
arjunaraoc (2024-01-06 01:07:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
Check my improvements https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145941805
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141494139
Vonter (2023-09-20 06:01:46+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Congrats on your first contribution to OpenStreetMap! If you’re interested in connecting with other mappers, do consider joining the regional OSM  groups:

OSM Bengaluru

Telegram: https://telegram.me/OSM_BLR

Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#OSM_BLR:matrix.org

OSM India

Telegram: https://telegram.me/OSMIndia

Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#osm-in-general:matrix.org

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2023-09-21 17:01:10+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/304892631. What is the mean of the tags
"access:conditional" = "private@14-20"
"access:conditional=private@14-20" = "physiotherapist"
Please also note that the time given in conditional does not quite correspond to the standard
Gazer75 (2023-09-20 14:29:19+00:00): Reversert. Allemannsretten vil gjelde her.
Gazer75 (2023-09-20 14:35:10+00:00): Sidan du ikkje kan vise til eit vedtak frå kommunen så kan stien vere der og folk kan bruke den. Om du fortset og slette så vil du bli rapportert til DWG for vandalisme.
harahu (2023-09-20 15:54:43+00:00): Set at dette changesettet slettet deler av en sti jeg har tegnet inn. Som Gazer75 sier: det er ikke noe grunn til å tro at dette området vil regnes som "privat", eller innmark, som vi sier på norsk. Etter norsk lovpraksis har ikke hytteeiere mulighet til å begrense ferdsel på sti utover de nærmeste 10-20 meterne fra hytteveggen. Denne stien ligger akkurat utenfor denne sonen, som medfører at ferdsel er tillatt, med mindre kommune og statsforvalter har gjort et eksplisitt vedtak om noe annet.

Jeg ser at brukeren din har en lang historie med å slette denne stien. Det kan være greit som et resultat av en misforståelse, men jeg tenker du har fått ettertrykkelig beskjed nå.
oarn (2023-09-22 06:59:10+00:00): Dette er en sak som har pågått i flere år.
og grunnen er at det aldrig egentlig har gått sti her og det er heller ikke spurt om det. Stidelen ble også fjernet fra norgeskart av kommunen.
Sjekk Norgeskart.no som er karverket sitt kart. Du kan også forhøre deg med Øygarden kommune.
Dette til opplysning.
Gazer75 (2023-09-22 07:09:47+00:00): Stien er meir eller mindre synleg på foto som går 19 år tilbake i tid, så det er vel ikkje heilt rett.
Gazer75 (2023-09-22 07:11:41+00:00): Som det er peika på over så må ein ikkje spørje om lov til å gå forbi hytter så lenge ein er på god nok avstand.
oarn (2023-09-22 07:53:52+00:00): Men å lage seg sti må det spørres om.
Det ble spor der etter at veien ble bygd, pga. folk tok seg til rette og gikk over
oarn (2023-09-22 07:55:31+00:00): Det er en grunn til at den er fjernet av kartverket kanskje?
Gazer75 (2023-09-22 08:04:25+00:00): Ein lagar ikkje ein sti den oppstår fordi folk går der. At ein sti ikkje er i kartverket sine kart betyr lite. Dei bestemmer ikkje kor det er sti eller ikkje.

Du kan argumentere alt du vil, men så lenge du ikkje kan vise til eit skriftleg vedtak frå kommunen som også er godkjent av statsforvaltar så vil allemannsretten gjelde.

Forstår ikkje heilt problemet med stien. Så langt eg kan sjå er uteområdene til hyttene på andre sida. Om det er innsyn så bør det lett kunne reduserast ved å plante buskar lags stien. Kanskje ta det som ein dugnad med folk som har hytter der ute og dele kostnad.
oarn (2023-09-22 08:07:29+00:00): Stien blir et problem da folk ødelegger privat beplanting og utstyr som står på sin egen eiendom.
Gazer75 (2023-09-22 08:19:29+00:00): Foto visar ingen buskar i sprekken der stien går i 2022, og så ein rosebusk midt i stien. Dette er jo heilt klart for å gi argument og hindre ferdsel. Usikker på om dette faktisk er lov.

Som eg skreiv over så kan dette enkelt løysast ved å eventuelt plante buskar eller ein hekk på begge sider. Vil gi ein fin snarveg for alle som vil gå tur utover.

Så lenge du ikkje kan vise til eit skriftleg vedtak her så må du slutte å slette. Du eig ikkje Openstreetmap. Vi fylgjer lovene som gjeld og har hatt slike konfliktar andre plassar i landet.
Henry572 (2023-09-23 20:52:19+00:00): Hallo RUBITXL,
Vielen Dank für Deine Bearbeitung von OpenStreetMap!
Ich habe bei der neuen Bäckerei Oehme noch die weiteren Informationen aktualisiert, die Öffnungszeiten kann ich aber nicht herausfinden. Vielleicht kommst du ja nochmal vorbei und kannst diese eintragen oder mir hier schreiben. Vielleicht kannst du dann auch prüfen, ob es die Filiale https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7161294638 noch gibt, da die beiden ziemlich nah beieinander liegen.
Gruß, Hendrik

Hi RUBITXL,
First of all, thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap!
I have added some more information, but I don't know the opening hours of the new bakery. Maybe you can survey them and correct the OSM data or send them to me. Perhaps you can also check, whether the bakery https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7161294638 still exists, as they are the same brand and quite close to each other.
Hendrik
arjunaraoc (2024-01-06 01:01:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141495582
evgenykatyshev (2024-09-13 08:16:09+00:00): Hello! I see you added a lot of roads with tag highway=road (displayed as darker grey lines on default map on osm.org). This tag is generic tag for roads, and currently it's considered as an error.

I'd like to change it to something else. Could you tell me what kind of road you have described with this tag?
AlexanderGlonti (2024-09-13 09:02:32+00:00): Hello. In this area some roads are mixed, some of them are paved, asphalt or concrete. month by month situation is changing for example few month ago when there was a just ground, not it is paved or concrete.
Anyway, it you can refer me to the list of mentioned errors, I can fix them in sequence.
evgenykatyshev (2024-09-13 10:29:41+00:00): I mean all roads with tag highway=road around this area https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/41.67471/42.45091

I guess all of them could be changed to highway=track
John Baldridge (2023-09-21 07:06:03+00:00): I want to get started with HOT, but I also want to make sure I'm doing something helpful.  That's why I requested verification.  Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141495702
adiatmad (2023-09-25 14:44:55+00:00): Hello, the edits you made look great. If you ever want to make changes that are more complex, JOSM would be a good choice for you, sir. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141495702
DUGA (2024-10-08 16:07:48+00:00): What is concealed? Unless it is hidden in a building, nothing is concealed.

Please read this page carefully: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mimics