piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Глеб (2023-12-27 11:36:34+00:00): названия улиц должны соответствовать соглашению. например не может быть улицы Ясной, но может быть Ясная улица.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
gscholz (2023-02-16 06:53:47+00:00): Hi sefo83,
your recent changesets have created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=32.62643&lat=38.00533&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132611579

As you may know, this kind of errors irritate routing software and look ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
mueschel (2023-02-17 09:38:38+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!

I see you and your group added many tags like these:
Building Age = 50
Building material = concrete
Building type = Hall canteen
Earthquake vulnerability = moderate
Fire vulnerability = moderate
Firefighting Equipment = no
Number of entrance or exit = 1
Number of floors = 1
Number of staircase = 0
Staircase = no
Type of Staircase = no

These tags are not common in OSM and not used in any other place. 
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps. Also, our database in case sensitive, all keys have to be in lower case.
Please make sure that you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.

In addition, please point the leader of this mapping effort to our organized editing guidelines:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
Nusrat_Jahan_Nilima (2023-02-26 15:05:33+00:00): I have noted that & I am working on it. Thank you for notifying me.
mueschel (2023-03-18 09:59:38+00:00): Hi,
can we expect any cleanup here? It's a month now, and there are still new and misspelled tags added every week.
adiatmad (2023-03-23 08:21:06+00:00): I attempted to contact the project manager through this link (https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/14227#questionsAndComments).

Mikko (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mikko_tamura) should working closely with them on this
Sawan Shariar (2023-03-24 01:36:04+00:00): @adiatmad @mueschel I have created this project on request of She Leads She Inspire team of the Open Mapping Hub Asia Pacific. I am not coordinating the project and team. @mikko_tamura is the key person of the project and team and he is known better about the project, team and tagnifo.
Nusrat_Jahan_Nilima (2023-03-24 17:07:22+00:00): ok, I am cleaning it up as soon as possible...
Nusrat_Jahan_Nilima (2023-03-24 17:40:17+00:00): I have done the changes
Benoît C MdP (2023-02-17 08:20:40+00:00): Bonjour Evan

Pour ce tronçon de la rue de Charenton, ta modification fait perdre en précision https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120689569 . On savait sans ambiguïté qu'il y avait une piste cyclable de chaque côté de la voie et leur sens de circulation. Mais à présent, on sait juste que la rue est à double sens pour les vélos et qu'il y a une piste cyclable.  Les outils de contrôle qualité seraient à améliorer sur ce point.
Je corrige

Bonne continuation

Benoît
MxxCon (2023-02-16 22:33:49+00:00): I can't tell in this specific case if it is needed or not, but in general building relations are not wrong.. they are used with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132614547
brandonbds (2023-02-17 17:32:48+00:00): Yes indeed. Here, all building parts are within the building outline.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132614547
MxxCon (2023-02-16 22:34:47+00:00): Why would you edit your own entry to point to NOT WORKING website address?!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132615238
Jens Walkerling AZ (2023-02-16 08:13:02+00:00): stimmt routing war in dem fall nicht korrekt (das ist ein gekiester Schotterweg, nicht für Fahrzeuge geeignet und nur ein Notausgang auf ein Halbstockwerk
habi (2023-02-16 08:18:35+00:00): Ooops!
Sorry für den geographic grossen Änderungssatz.
Ein paar JOSM-Fehlerwaren noch in der Region um Gümmenen, während ich wegen der Notiz in Nidwalden editierte...
AurélienQ (2024-08-30 09:53:10+00:00): Bonjour, faires attention à ce que vous modifiez, vous n'avez pas cartographié un parc de jeu mais un parc photovoltaïque.
gscholz (2023-02-21 07:44:06+00:00): Hi asibwene_ImportAccount,
obviously there have been some import activities in your region which resulted in several errors regarding not connected ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=34.43354&lat=-1.38043&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

As you may know, this kind of errors irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Samwel Kyando_Import Account (2023-02-22 08:31:32+00:00): Thanks for bringing this up Guido it seems there have been some error when mappers were resolving
data conflicts.

We are inspecting the whole project and fix these error, Also there will be some validation / final cleaning of these data when completely mapped so hopefully these issue will be solved.

Many thanks.
Samwel Kyando.
gscholz (2023-02-23 08:23:30+00:00): Hi Narindra ,
this changeset has detroyed this wetland relation, which I just had repaired recently:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15483616/history

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-15.73381&lat=12.55923&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132616399

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Narindra Fidintsoa (2023-02-24 19:51:38+00:00): Hi Guido,
I'm really sorry for this conflict, I I finished editing today.

Kind regards
nw520 (2023-03-16 21:39:53+00:00): Could you please explain why you edited n1300861177? The church is already mapped as w114976975.
Jakka (2023-02-16 08:39:37+00:00): Straat naam schrijfwijze verbeterd
user_12531033 (2023-02-17 01:59:22+00:00): 您好，山区的铁路线路卫星图会有偏移，北京周围的铁路线路已经根据工务数据校正过，请勿根据卫星图直接编辑，会造成很大的偏移量，谢谢。
hdThomas (2023-02-17 03:22:23+00:00): 好的，抱歉
Iko IRM-RV (2023-04-03 07:31:06+00:00): Hi, Thank you for contributing to OSM, but I see from this changeset that you have a lot of ways that don't have tags (untagged ways). Could you please fix this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132616992
Mike_citadin (2023-03-09 18:38:51+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour l'ajout vous avez dû y passer du temps. Cependant je pense qu'une carte doit représenter le présent et non le futur. Cela risque de perdre des cyclotouristes qui vont aller chercher un itinéraire là où il n'existe pas encore, et être bloqués par le chantier.

Je sais que vous l'avez mis en état "proposed" mais les fonds de cartes ne font pas la différence.

PS: ce n'est pas correct à Corre. Le projet est rive est du canal en continuité directe de la voie existante.
Mike_citadin (2023-03-09 18:46:39+00:00): Les zones terminées déjà utilisées par les piétons et cyclistes sont à cartographier en tant que tel. L'itinéraire, lui, doit attendre d'être complet.
SekeRob (2023-02-16 08:57:20+00:00): Think from building node history shown in ID Editor the drag happened in CS 132582990
Luzandro (2023-02-21 17:31:14+00:00): Hallo,

noexit=yes entspricht nicht direkt dem, was als Sackgasse beschildert ist (das ergibt sich für Router sowieso automatisch), sondern ein Hinweis für Tools und andere Mapper, dass hier tatsächlich keine Verbindung besteht (auch nicht für Fußgänger oder Radfahrer), auch wenn die Wege nahe beieinander liegen - siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:noexit
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132617532
stillhart (2023-02-25 14:55:07+00:00): hey, wie geil ist das den?!? Danke für die Ergänzungen :-D.
map per (2023-02-16 09:32:27+00:00): Hallo Yarno in het snor,

And welcome to OpenStreetMaps!

You asked for a reveiw of your changes:
If you contribute to hotosm projects please only edit in the project region and try to keep the changes within on changeset local (1). Therefore please safe the changes in one country before you move on to the next country. If you spread your changes over a bigger area like in this changeset (see (2)) its not possible to review and check your changes with standard analyzing software any more.

Thanks and best regards
map per

(1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
(2) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132617895
ivanbranco (2023-02-21 19:01:26+00:00): Ciao Alessandra, benvenuta su OSM.

Non capisco cosa stai cercando di fare, in tutte e 15 le modifiche che hai effettuato fin ora hai solo spostato nodi, creando anche strani angoli negli edifici, che non credo esistano. Cosa stavi cercando di fare?
Lennardderudder (2023-09-11 09:12:12+00:00): Dag dvdhoven, betekent dit dat knooppunt R32 en R35 nu niet meer bestaan omdat dit traject is verwijderd, of zijn deze knooppunten zelf nog fysiek aanwezig ook al liggen ze gewoon als een tussenpunt op trajecten tussen andere knooppunten??
dvdhoven (2023-09-11 12:16:20+00:00): Er is nog steeds een route R32-R35.
Kennelijk is er een duplicaat ontstaan, die ik verwijderd heb.
Maar ik heb geen idee, wat er precies gebeurt is.
Niet spannend ook, er is nog steeds een R32-R35 en dat is het  belangrijkste.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Rico557 (2023-02-16 10:49:14+00:00): можа пераблыталі з гэтай кропкай? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4952281431
4004 (2023-02-26 23:33:45+00:00): 100%
J-MUC (2023-02-16 09:25:34+00:00): CS comment should have been: Area being cleared for construction work
FenyMufyd (2023-06-19 13:00:43+00:00): Halo pak, mau konfirmasi aja untuk lampu merah pertigaan ini jalannya dipisahkan sama median jalan kan? makanya saya anggap ini jadi one-way karena ada jalurnya pecah jadi dua di lampu merahnya. Saya izin revert editnya ya, terima kasih
mavl (2023-04-25 09:03:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
marczoutendijk (2023-02-16 10:42:11+00:00): All your changesets are named the same! Can you improve that? You should write in the changeset what you are adding or changing.
Please read this:

همه مجموعه های تغییر شما یکسان نامگذاری شده اند! آیا می توانید آن را بهبود ببخشید؟ شما باید در تغییرات مجموعه بنویسید که چه چیزی را اضافه یا تغییر می دهید. لطفا این را بخوان:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
ianlopez1115 (2023-02-16 14:21:46+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset
SekeRob (2023-02-16 09:37:01+00:00): That's what I did while correcting  inner role issues, but then your save annulled that, so I did it again. I think you working in ID and me in JOSM on the same forest zone puts things out of sink.

ciao
Voonosm (2023-02-16 09:40:50+00:00): Yeah, we got into each others hair there, sorry.I moved away now to not disturb you, editing elsewhere :)
SekeRob (2023-02-16 09:57:34+00:00): OK, well I only came here because OSM Inspector highlighted duplicate segments on a grassland/scrub inner combo. When doing a correction run I often do some additional mapping like here creating scree zones.
ID Is not very good at working on large multipolygons as it does not load all elements (154 or so now). JOSM actually warns for that and has a button to fetch all parts so a full integrity validation can be performed. After 2 years I switched main mapping tool and now do 99.9% in JOSM, it was getting used to though, has some really slick features and great validation diagnostics, many speciality plug-ins.

buona mappatura
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-16 09:50:47+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146422281

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10669162485
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10669162486
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10669162487

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_8655426 (2023-02-16 10:31:52+00:00): Thank you for your reply and correction.
Unfortunately, there seems to be more wrong edits. (other denominations) 
I'll wait for DWG's decision.
DP24PH (2023-02-17 04:24:15+00:00): Hi! You might have edited a certain way segment(s) that is out of SBM Eliserio G. Tagle Avenue. and encroached on the Southern portions of Cavite, Taal Volcano Natural Park, and the Central portion of Batangas. Kindly limit your changeset boundary to per city basis. Thank you very much.


DP24
Kitty_Mars (2023-02-20 11:35:32+00:00): Hello DP24, thank you for reaching out. I intended to upload these changes in two separate changesets, but it seems I mistakenly uploaded them together. I appreciate you bringing this to my attention.
DWNR (2023-02-16 09:55:25+00:00): dwnr
Frans S (2023-03-19 17:20:44+00:00): About highway tagging:

Please apply the rules described in this wiki
Most common taggings.
Rural areas : Unclassified,  track , path, service
Urban areas: unclassified, residential, path.


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132619849
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-02-21 12:59:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/335200206
ser ikke ud til at være underjordisk
DWNR (2023-02-16 10:13:31+00:00): DZCR 630
Road__Driver (2023-02-16 10:40:12+00:00):  Il curvone è stato tolto, con la strada rettilinea
Road__Driver (2023-02-16 10:40:24+00:00):  Il curvone è stato tolto, con la strada rettilinea
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-16 10:40:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10669307756
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2960398165

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Górski-Kalwaryjczyk (2023-02-17 07:48:21+00:00): skorygowane!
habi (2023-03-14 14:34:17+00:00): Ciao Chris

I've stumbled over these `amenity=fixme`s that Every Door adds to OpenStreetMap as nodes [1].
They feel much more like being OSM Notes.
Can you explain what's going on here that needs to be corrected, as the paths here look nicely mapped from aerial imagery.

Greetings from Bern,
habi

[1]: https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/discussions/546
cbeddow (2023-03-29 19:31:21+00:00): Yes this should be a note. I cannot see the path in aerial imagery really, but I walked along here and there is a clear path for visitors, to connect toward the farm area. The tourist sign nearby shows a loop route for tourists to see the orchards. I will walk again to check the route exactly if it needs fixing, when the ground is not muddy now :)
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-02-16 11:32:42+00:00): Hi cae42,

was this mechanical edit discussed before?
cae42 (2023-02-16 12:14:34+00:00): Hi
No
If this is a problem, you can drop my modifications.
Best regards
Cyril
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-02-17 08:00:30+00:00): Yes, this a problem. Do you know https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits ?

Such edits must be discussed with the community previously.

Which sources do you use?
cae42 (2023-02-17 08:26:23+00:00): Bonjour
J'écris dans ma langue maternelle pour éviter les erreurs d'interprétation.
Mes modifications sont dans la majeure partie des cas une correction de données saisies. J'ai donc apporté une plus-value que sur de la consolidation de données Tesla saisies auparavant par d'autres personnes.
J'ai homogénéisé les données eu égard à la page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station/Tesla_Motors
Je le répète : je n'ai pas fait d'ajouts en masses mais de la correction en masse.
En quoi cela pose problème ?
Bien à vous
Cyril
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-02-17 08:33:15+00:00): We don't want such mass edits!

That's why https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct exists.

I will revert your edits.
cae42 (2023-02-17 08:41:07+00:00): Je ne comprends pas mais c'est votre choix.
Bien à vous,
cae42 (2023-02-17 08:45:33+00:00): Sur les 154 superchargers Tesla de l'Allemagne, j'ai modifié 40 entités (les ajouts se comptent sur les doigts de la main) soit 25%
Il y avait des données obsolètes (nb de chargeurs ayant évolué) ou des données erronées ou peu intelligibles...
Je suis donc sceptique sur votre choix mais c'est le vôtre
adrianojbr (2023-04-05 14:13:18+00:00): O nome da via está em conformidade com a lei que a denominou, conforme versão 4 do histórico de alterações da linha.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132622958
VLD512 (2023-05-15 11:49:27+00:00): Acho que este caso pode se enquadrar como aqueles indicados de ambas as formas, pois encontro uso de ambas as formas.
Como "Rudolpho" não é um nome muito comum em PT, mantive a forma mais simples para fácil identificação do usuário comum. Salvo engano, lembro de ter sido uma das solicitações do cliente, que poderíamos usar uma forma não necessariamente oficial, mas que fosse de fácil identificação.
Veja o app Moovit que é muito usado aqui como referência:
https://moovitapp.com/index/pt-br/transporte_p%C3%BAblico-Rua_Rudolfo_Pollnow-Joinville-street_25486216-4140
adrianojbr (2023-05-17 00:14:09+00:00): Ao corrigir para o nome designado em lei, eu já mantive a grafia alternativa em alt_name.

Manter a grafia correta no mapa pode ajudar que as pessoas aprendam.

Para colocar a forma mais simples em name, teria que ser conferida se há placa de sinalização e qual grafia consta nela.

Não sei qual a base no Moovit e nem sei se pode ser usada como fonte para o OSM. De todo modo, parece que está usando uma versão desatualizada do OSM, onde constava ainda a grafia da versão 3 dessa via.
VLD512 (2023-05-24 16:31:19+00:00): Refeito de acordo com esta orientação, ou seja, usando o nome formal da rua.
DWNR (2023-02-16 11:06:15+00:00): DZCR Legazpi
Leo Slager (2023-02-16 23:46:07+00:00): De routerelaties zijn weer gerepareerd.
Diverse wegen op moeten knippen en in de juiste volgorde geplaatst in de routerelatie.
DWNR (2023-02-16 11:13:56+00:00): DZCR Legazpi
Leo Slager (2023-02-16 23:43:37+00:00): De gebroken routerelaties zijn weer gerepareerd.
1 routerelatie met 2 stop_positions Tonnebrand en de ander was zonder.
JeroenHoek (2023-02-16 11:28:46+00:00): Is de verkeerssituatie daar veranderd sinds zomer 2022?

https://www.google.com/maps/@52.3813514,5.0023099,3a,75y,200.32h,82.58t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1seZLvjRDtmqGZSBUJ6zfB6w!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DeZLvjRDtmqGZSBUJ6zfB6w%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D38.880093%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192
Parkeren_IsabellBones (2023-02-16 11:49:16+00:00): Ik zag dat alleen maar een kleine deel van de dijk als One Way was ingetekend maar kon op de boorden nergens zien dat er een one way restrictie was, daarom heb ik hem weggehaald. Mocht de situatie anders zijn dan op de fotos van 2022 mag je mijn wijzigingen weer terug zetten.
JeroenHoek (2023-02-16 12:02:08+00:00): Er staat toch een C3, verboden in te rijden verkeersbord? Is die weg? Als de situatie zoals Streetview hem toont nog klopt, dan mag je er vanuit het oosten niet inrijden. Dat kun je aangeven met een klein stukje oneway, of met een restriction-relatie (lastiger en minder eenvoudig om te beheren).

Zoals je het nu wijzigde hef je de inrijbeperking op. Was dat je bedoeling, of begreep je de tags niet?
JeroenHoek (2023-02-16 12:20:25+00:00): Excuus, C1 hangt er in augustus 2022, niet C3. Voorheen was daar zo te zien een C6.
Parkeren_IsabellBones (2023-02-16 12:42:04+00:00): Ik begreep de tags wel, maar kon geen bord vinden dat deze tags onderbouwd
JeroenHoek (2023-02-16 12:48:39+00:00): Het is een valse eenrichtingsweg; die staat hier omschreven: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway

Die kun je toepassen waar je effectief maar één kant op kan. Dat is niet per se verkeerd.
JeroenHoek (2023-02-16 12:57:01+00:00): Als je dit helemaal naar de tagging met `:backward` wil omzetten (die al op https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225745574 staat), dan moet je wel meer doen dan alleen oneway=yes omzetten naar no. Al die andere oneway-tags zijn dan ook overbodig (oneway:mofa etc.). Daarnaast hangt er nu schijnbaar een C1 in plaats van de eerdere C6, dus motor_vehicle:backward=no moet vehicle:backward=no worden. Ook traffic_sign moet aangepast worden, en eigenlijk moeten bicycle, mofa, en moped tags op de weg zelf op use_sidepath staan totdat de beide bromfietspaden erbij komen, vanwege de G12a (en G12b).

De inrijbeperking zit nu ook op het verkeerde segment, hij hoort eigenlijk op https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1097561992 waar de borden staan.
Parkeren_IsabellBones (2023-02-16 13:07:04+00:00): Wil jij de boven genoemde dingen dan gewoon aanpassen naar de tags die volgens jou correct zijn in de situatie? Door die uitleg ben ik nu ietsjes in de waar
JeroenHoek (2023-02-16 13:18:05+00:00): Dat is prima. Laat je dit soort constructies dan aan anderen over in het vervolg?
JeroenHoek (2023-02-16 13:27:46+00:00): Aangepast in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132629604
basilisk (2023-05-17 17:20:30+00:00): А тут https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10669416380/history#map=17/52.07742/23.73879
точно есть «Зов»? Я его там в глаза не видел. Да и на указанном их сайте нет такого салона
kate_rocketdata (2023-06-05 10:00:44+00:00): Добрый день! 
На сайте у них указано, что есть точка по адресу РБ, г. Брест, ул. 28 Июля, д. 30, ТЦ «Материк» https://prnt.sc/ddFBCtGne9ZN
MxxCon (2023-02-16 22:40:33+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate what are those missing building parts? They do not appear on the satellite imagery..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132623887
Sparrow93 (2023-02-17 05:06:09+00:00): Hello, thank you for the question, the basis for the addition was a satellite image of Bing (it shows a trace of the added transitions from building to building). I also used the bing street panorama of 2021 https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=40.744878%7E-74.006938&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=1&style=x&dir=45 .3&pi=-4.2 
and the renderering photos of the building project that I found helped me a lot https://www.heatherwick.com/project/lantern-house/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132623887
MxxCon (2023-02-17 05:18:19+00:00): I see what you are referring to.👍
Perhaps it's better to retag these buildings using building:part= style as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part ?