piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Laura&Luca home (2024-04-12 12:41:47+00:00): Ciao e grazie per la gentilezza. Io il carattere l'ho cambiato il giorno stesso infatti è giusto. Non capisco questa poca simpatia...
Laura&Luca home (2024-04-12 12:47:36+00:00): No, ti chiedo scusa. L'avevo cambiato ma probabilmente non salvato.
eggie (2024-03-14 15:03:39+00:00): Dag marsmi Je hebt hier Schuitendiep 88-11 verplaatst naar een ander pand. 
Misschien per abuis door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148645114

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-03-14 15:06:49+00:00): De adresnode heb ik teruggeplaatst.
marsmi2024 (2024-03-14 17:52:25+00:00): Sorry dat is dan een foutje van mij
eggie (2024-03-14 18:25:07+00:00): No problem.... het komt omdat je dan toevallig iets selecteert mwt de linkermuisknoo en dan met dezelde knop de kaart gaat verschuiven. Die schuift dan niet.. maar de adresnode wel. Bij iD altijd op je hoede.
Met josm schuif je met de rechtermuisknop. Een aanrader dus.
Mapse
eggie
BCNorwich (2024-03-14 16:10:16+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

These green spaces are not really garden:type=community
leisure=garden as this implies the community can partake in gardening activities there. Do you think the council would allow someone to cultivate it for potatoes or a rose bed? This type of area is usually tagged as landuse=grass.

Regards Bernard.
mapman1980 (2024-03-15 13:25:58+00:00): Thanks Bernard. Obviously I don't think that..! 

They are more than grass though and are designated open spaces in the local plan so wanted to distinguish them from regular grass areas. These contain maintained flower beds and shrubbery. Is there an alternate designation or should I map the flower beds/shrubs separate?
BCNorwich (2024-03-15 18:53:56+00:00): Hi, The areas seem to be mainly grass so I would leave it as landuse=grass and map the flowerbeds within the grass area. The tag landuse=flowerbed is only a proposal, though it has been used thousands of times.

Regards Bernard.
Wulf4096 (2024-07-29 18:45:11+00:00): Moin,
hab das hier rückgängig gemacht. Und den Punkt noch dahin gezogen, wo er hingehört: In die Colonnaden.

Wenn du deine eigene Praxis mappen willst, dann erstell bitte einen neuen Punkt hierfür.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-04 17:03:19+00:00): 

Hello!

Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree" (or "Arbre", in French).

So for buildings it is not needed to put batiment as their name.

Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1262581523 is specifically named with such name?

Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.

And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
BCNorwich (2024-03-15 07:33:25+00:00): Hi, I just wanted to point out that you added the tag highway=path to a 28km long residential area outline Way: 798908748. It would be a great addition to the footpath network but very difficult to walk. So I've removed the tag.

Regards Bernard.
michel60 (2024-04-13 20:37:47+00:00): Bonjour,
De préférence, il ne faut pas scinder les rond-point. Il faut les laisser en un seul morceau.
Utiliser GEOFABRIK OSM Inspector pour contrôler la continuité des "route"
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=1.96355&lat=48.79397&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.94&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid
- Route en vert -> correcte
- Route en noir -> en erreur
(vue graphique mise à jour toute les 13heures
Cordialement Michel
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-14 22:59:20+00:00): Please review:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*
Jrachi (2024-03-14 15:52:18+00:00): Ciao.
La buona volontà ci vuole!
Ma sembra che tu non abbia ben chiare le idee della differenza te un percorso ed una relazione.
Dovresti prima mappare l'intero percorso, e poi unire i vari tratti con una relazione.
MarcoR (2024-03-14 16:18:16+00:00): @Squarcia Claudio

Sulla wiki dovresti trovare informazioni su come mappare un sentiero CAI: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI#Percorsi_escursionistici

In particolare, come ti è stato fatto notare, i tag riguardanti il percorso escursionistico si inseriscono su un oggetto di tipo relazione che ha come membri i tratti (way) del percorso stesso.

Buon mapping,
Marco
tordans (2024-03-14 15:22:15+00:00): Vielen Dank. Und frohes Mappen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148646912
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-19 07:14:08+00:00): Reviewed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148647421
NeisBot (2024-03-19 15:45:46+00:00): Hello Lari Z, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments \n
Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Piz Pachific (2024-03-23 14:56:15+00:00): Liebe Daniela. Vielen Dank und schön, dass du für OSM mappst :-) Leider passt eine temporäre Veranstaltung nicht in OSM, zumal mir kein Tagging-Schema für so etwas bekannt ist. Habe den Punkt deshalb wieder gelöscht. Evt. kannst du aber sicherstellen, dass das Gelände gut gemappt ist, so dass die Besucher, welche z.B. Routing-Apps auf Basis von OSM verwenden, die Parkplätze oder anderes auch gut finden werden. Lg Chrigi
Daniela Göpfert (2024-03-25 07:27:21+00:00): Hoi Chrigi, ohje das tut mir leid, Danke fürs korrigieren. Ich hätte es vorgezogen, das nicht über Google Maps zu machen, aber für so Doofies wie mich, bleibt wohl nur diese Möglichkeit. Lieben Gruss, Daniela
Piz Pachific (2024-03-27 08:03:08+00:00): Hoi Daniela. Was hast du denn für einen Einsatzzweck? Entweder kann ich dir Tipps geben oder du fragst auf der Schweizer Mailingliste [1] oder im Forum [2] nach, dort wird man dir sicherlich gerne behilflich sein. Lg Chrigi

[1] http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/archives/list/talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch/
[2] https://community.openstreetmap.org/
Piz Pachific (2024-03-27 08:06:07+00:00): Für Veranstaltungen könnte z.B. uMap hilfreich sein: https://umap.osm.ch
Piz Pachific (2024-03-27 15:26:03+00:00): Habe mal ein wenig die Geometrien in der Umgebung verfeinert: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=149227049
Daniela Göpfert (2024-04-05 05:38:52+00:00): Lieber Chrigi, Danke dir für die hilfreichen Tipps! uMap sieht gut aus! Werde mich nach dem Anlass gerne mal intensiver mit OpenStreetMap auseinandersetzen, wer weiss, vielleicht kann ich gelegentlich auch was «Nützliches» beitragen und nicht nur für unnötige Arbeit (Deinerseits) sorgen. Bis dahin, lieben Gruss, Daniela
Piz Pachific (2024-04-05 15:36:30+00:00): Liebe Daniela. Das ist ja das schöne an Open-Source, jeder darf die Daten/Produkte nutzen und daran mitwirken, aber es ist weder das eine noch das andere ein muss. Bei Fragen ungeniert fragen. Lg Chrigi
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-04 17:08:29+00:00): 

Hello!

Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree" (or "Arbre", in French).

So for buildings it is not needed to put Bâtiment as their name.

Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1262607631 is specifically named with such name?

Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.

And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
Filip009 (2024-03-15 09:51:32+00:00): Zdravím, toto určite nebude spôsobené tým. V OSM navidácií všetko funguje https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=48.23569%2C17.03758%3B48.23473%2C17.03719
eggie (2024-03-14 17:17:51+00:00): Dag S_Emo
In ieder geval niet als construction=yes 
Een weg die op constructie staat taggen we als highway=construction
construction=.......

Hoe is de stand van de het 'ombouwen' van rotonde naar T kruising. Het barst hier van de routerelaties. Dus het heeft echt aandacht nodig.
Wellicht eerst de nieuwe wegen toevoegen met highway=proposed of construction. Is alles al afgesloten? 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-03-14 17:21:55+00:00): M298228 Boekel Herinrichting / onderhoud van Rotonde Herinrichting Kerkstraat
26 feb. 2024 00:00-12 apr. 2024 00:00

https://melvin.ndw.nu/public

Zou eerst deze situatie intekenen als highway construction en de rotonde even ongemoeid laten.
Zie
https://www.inboekel.nl/start-herinrichting-centrum-en-opbreken-rotonde/
eggie (2024-03-14 17:24:17+00:00): ... en voor het knooppunt, de fiets- en de OV routes even hulp van het forum vragen.
eggie (2024-03-14 17:28:04+00:00): ... en wanneer er geen doorkomen aan is de rotonde maar even op highway=construction zetten en de routerelaties intact laten. Die is er volgens mij al niet meer. 
De nieuwe situatie kan dan ook al ingetekend worden en een ervaren mapper kan dan de routes omleggen. 
Denk dat je wel wat hebt aan de plantekening. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-03-14 20:22:30+00:00): Komende hoofdstructuur toegevoegd als proposed.
S_Emo (2024-03-20 00:06:19+00:00): Dank je wel Eggie,

Ik had een en ander van een oom vernomen, dat het ook echt afgesloten is. Maar ben ter plekke niet genoeg bekend / niet zelf ter plekke aanwezig om alle veranderingen goed te verwerken. Vooral dus ook als "aandachtspunt". Misschien had ik beter een melding kunnen maken, ipv op construction te zetten inderdaad. Komende maand moet er wellicht wel meer tijd / gelegenheid zijn. Dus dan kan ik kijken om nog eens verder op te pakken. Maar laat anderen zich niet weerhouden.
citrula (2024-03-14 23:44:02+00:00): You added overlapping buildings in this changeset. Also, please don't add descriptive names - you can map the church once it is open.
eggie (2024-03-14 17:06:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback   De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Kanoxitu_zh (2024-03-14 16:52:06+00:00): 感谢完善
tekim (2024-03-25 23:56:05+00:00): Hello, Thanks for editing the map.  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Street View, which you cited as your source, when editing OpenStreetMap.  This is due to Google's terms of service.
tekim (2024-03-25 23:57:28+00:00): This is being reverted because it cited Google Street View as a source.  We are not allowed to use Google Street View when editing OSM.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149153812
leojth (2024-03-15 15:25:00+00:00): Hi! It looks like some of the edits in this changeset only has the purpose of replacing a multipolygon (example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1262621355). Please note that adjecant multipolygons sharing ways are valid mapping and replacing them without any other improvements only risk triggerring edit wars. Instead I suggest focusing your time on blank spots on the map, which we have a lot of in Sweden. Happy mapping!
MichS (2024-03-16 06:20:21+00:00): access=no bedeutet Zutritt nicht erlaubt oder verboten. So wie es andeuten meinen sie wohl „nicht möglich“. Das tagging muss dann geändert werden.
 Falls keine Reaktion erfolgt, werde ich Änderungen vornehmen, auch an anderen CS.
Drebn (2024-03-17 23:02:09+00:00): Die Nutzung von Forstwegen ist als Fußweg grundsätzlich immer erlaubt, da es in Rheinland-Pfalz ein uneingeschränktes Waldbetretungsrecht gibt. Dieses gilt im Prinzip sogar 24 Stunden täglich.
Dieses kann in Ausnahmefällen eingeschränkt werden. 
Dazu gehört jedoch nicht das Befahren mit motorisierten Fahrzeugen. Die Nutzung von Rückegassen für Forstmaschinen ist auch für Fahrräder jeglicher Art nicht erlaubt.
Zu Fuß darf der Wald sogar abseits der Wege betreten werden.
Dabei dürfen jedoch keine Pflanzen beschädigt und auch keine Tiere in ihrem Lebensraum beeinträchtigt werden.
Das sollte aber selbstverständlich sein.
In den anderen CS wurden illegale MB-Trails entfernt. Das sind auch keine Wanderwege, sondern teilweise mißbrauchte Wildwechsel.
Wenn hier hier in OSM unautorisierte Wanderwege hinterlegt werden, ist der Ärger vorprogrammiert. Außerdem kann bei Notfällen nur schwierig geholfen werden, da es keine Zuwegungen für Rettungsfahrzeuge gibt.
Drebn
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-14 18:29:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM!  Good edit and good catch!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148651512
philippec (2024-03-14 18:04:30+00:00): https://imgur.com/0Aa7jti
Deze van Pieter bestaat dus niet meer.
Hebt u een foto van die in Oostende ?
philippec (2024-03-14 18:04:45+00:00): Zo een groot gebied maakt het voor iedereen moeilijk.
philippec (2024-03-14 18:18:14+00:00): Ik betwijfel het bestaan van het drinkwater in Oostende.  Ik heb het ook al eens gevonden op een website.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-23 10:01:15+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11731213902/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Milhouse (2024-03-15 00:59:04+00:00): I had a similar issue in Ealing - the bylaws forbid cycling in parks, yet more recent literature from the council encourages it. I spoke to a park ranger who said that they don't enforce rules against cycling in parks unless combined with anti social behaviour. I felt highway=footpath, bicycle=permissive, segregated=no was the best representation of reality where there was no signage explicitly forbidding cycling.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23135636#map=16/51.5084/-0.3094&layers=YN
Milhouse (2024-03-15 01:02:34+00:00): Though I notice with that combination, none of the routers choose a cycle route through the parks, so I guess that's moot.
Milhouse (2024-03-15 01:08:16+00:00): Sorry, one last point, I did raise the issue on the talk-gb mailing list - here's the discussion if you're interested:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2021-January/026002.html
LateNightTone (2024-03-15 07:10:57+00:00): Thanks for the link - an interesting read (and irritating for mappers and the public, naturally! Councils' ambiguous application of signage, standards and byelaws certainly makes a mess of the situation...)

My main concern on that particular way is that it was set for cycles only with no provision for foot traffic, when the exact opposite appears to be the case on the ground. Historically it was always a footpath (hence changing to footway), and on a recent visit I saw no signage designating it for cycles. It also has a rather dangerous blind junction at the south end (incidentally with a path which *is* explicilty marked as a shared cycleway). At the north end the footpath joins with a segregated foot pavement (physically separated from the cycleway), and the path itself isn't in a park, although Lampton Park is in the vicinity.

So I think this one is a bit more clear cut to be honest? Although separately to the south, where the adjacent shared cycleway joins footways in Lampton Park, which I updated with cycle=yes (at least all those that are wide enough and have good sightlines), your method of cycle=permissive could be more appropriate.
LateNightTone (2024-03-15 07:13:57+00:00): Apols for typos in last sentence, I mean bicycle=yes and bicycle=permissive of course.
Milhouse (2024-03-15 07:34:19+00:00): Regarding the highway=cycleway, highway=footway thing, I think in OSM in the UK cycleways do not forbid pedestrians, so highway=cycleway and segregated=no for a shared use path is very common, though I take your point that some might interpret that as a bike path where pedestrians are allowed rather than the other way round. highway=footway definitely prohibits cycling if not accompanied by a bicycle=yes/permissive tag.
Have you seen any council documents that establish a position one way or the other?
LateNightTone (2024-03-15 08:46:23+00:00): I haven't, and from your thread you've done plenty of digging in other council areas so well done! Street-level imagery shows what may be byelaw signage at the point this path meets the Great West Road, which might shed some light - but I no longer live in London so can't check. I suppose I was taking a different approach of mapping only affirmative signage, as the cycleway to the south and another on the east side of Lampton School are signed as shared cycleways, while this is not, and the omission leads me to mark this as foot designated only. Perhaps the most pragmatic option is to add a fixme tag asking someone to survey the path and check smallprint signage at North end to confirm whether bicycles are allowed?
LateNightTone (2024-03-15 08:50:57+00:00): I should add, tge previous routine of the way was incorrect, and made it look more like the cycleway would have continued from Lampton Park straight through to the Great West Road - but as you'll see on updated layout, it's not the case and there is a dogleg junction instead. I think it most likely that the designated cycle route continues west to Willow Gardens and does not dogleg up this footpath, while it may have looked more likely with the old mapped layout.
LateNightTone (2024-03-15 08:51:43+00:00): Ugh, forgive poor typing on a phone - "the previous routing"
rui228 (2025-05-17 16:44:57+00:00): Assunto:Histórico da Linha: 1262634513. 
Olá dmfr. 
Podes ajudar a definir melhor esta linha sem etiquetas. (continuo no desafio do MapRoulette)
Cumprimentos.
dmfr (2025-05-22 14:50:57+00:00): Corrigido. Obrigado pelo aviso.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-16 13:00:15+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11731262779/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-14 17:50:23+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11731257101

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
citrula (2024-03-14 23:42:10+00:00): You duplicated a lot of objects in this edit. Can you fix this? Let me know if you need help.
citrula (2024-03-15 03:36:35+00:00): I reverted this changeset because it duplicated a huge amount of features and added metadata from the changesets onto the objects themselves.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148669072
citrula (2024-03-14 23:38:53+00:00): Please leave a changeset comment so others can better understand what you are doing in the edit. Also, the opening_hours tag has a very specific syntax which needs to be used. You can use this site to make the values: https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148654553
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-19 07:22:45+00:00): Reviewed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148654692
TrickyFoxy (2024-03-16 21:09:48+00:00): Сомнительное название
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-14 18:30:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11731385701

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
AndyB_66 (2024-03-14 18:50:47+00:00): It seems you are not reacting to comments to your changesets - but anyway, I ask you once more (and for the last time) to follow the OSM community rules and use the correct descriptions for your changesets: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
TravellingSailesman (2024-03-20 09:39:49+00:00): Tradução automática do português:

Olá Filipe Fonseca,

tenha cuidado ao editar. Nessa edição, você também alterou/danificou o formato de várias estradas conectadas ao edifício do terminal. Resolvi o problema.

---

English:

Hello Filipe Fonseca,

please be careful when editing. In this edit you also changed / damaged the shape of several roads connected to the terminal building. I solved the problem.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-14 19:00:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/846025609

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
aw_LT (2024-03-19 12:16:06+00:00): reverted some buildings via josm-undelete in Innsbruck, Grauer-Stein-Weg, see:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148858044
Xvtn (2024-03-17 20:52:35+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your change here. Looks great to me! The only possible issue I see is that for the cuisine tag you've changed it from "cuisine=burger" to "cuisine=burger;juice". This is valid, but it means the cafe sells juice and burgers. Since it's vegan, that seemed like a possible mistake to me. But maybe they serve vegan burgers? What do you think? Let me know.
Anyway, thanks for your contributions, and nice job on this update!
ellenhp (2024-03-18 01:25:25+00:00): Yup! They have vegan burgers, wraps, stuff like that. Afaik the way to map that is diet:vegan=only (or yes, but it's only in this case) plus the cuisine type. I think people do sometimes use cuisine=vegan but as a vegan that's not very helpful for me when picking a place so I chose to do it this way.
ellenhp (2024-03-18 01:26:30+00:00): Thanks for the feedback though! This is a more complicated change than the ones I've done so far, even though it's pretty simple still. Eventually I'll work up to doing bigger stuff maybe. :)
Xvtn (2024-03-18 02:22:25+00:00): Ah, gotcha! Sounds like you're more familiar with this than I am! Lol. Well thanks again for the info, and happy mapping!
streckenkundler (2024-03-14 20:21:46+00:00): Hei... Ich sehe, du tastest dich langsam ran... Weiter so! 

Es sieht doch gut aus!

Viele Grüße,

Sven
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-14 20:22:31+00:00): you're doing the lord's work!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148657985
tekim (2024-03-14 21:11:01+00:00): Thanks!  Some of the way this stuff is mapped is crazy!  Another thing I am seeing is greens overlapping fairways.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148657985
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-14 22:54:33+00:00): please do not falsely change paths to cartpaths in the parking lot just so it shows up a certain way for your game.

I have reverted this changeset in part or full.
citrula (2024-03-14 23:36:14+00:00): Hi, what's your source for the interior layout?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148658363
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-19 07:10:21+00:00): Vandalism
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148658425