piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
KhalidKashmiri (2025-09-29 00:49:45+00:00): Najgorszy plan (oparty na) SOR jaki widziałem. Pomijam brak połowy znaków, ale napisanie ul. Bohaterów z Kopalni "Wójek" to już przegięcie
NeisBot (2025-09-29 01:18:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-29 11:07:20+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172596500
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-24 22:45:39+00:00): Stripped additional SEO spam tags in changeset 183129788

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183129788
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-24 22:48:31+00:00): NB Pascal, in case you see this, you might want to strip logo=* and image=* in these cases as well as they are commonly added by these SEO spam accounts, and typically link to non-free, copyrighted and trademarked images hosted on external sites (and sometimes even on Google Maps) that provide little to no usable value for the community.
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-31 12:50:05+00:00): @CAM-Gerlach, thank you for your feedback!

A previous version also removed note=*, slogan=*, website=*, and operator=* if they had been added by the flagged account. However, I was not entirely comfortable removing several added tags, so I decided to remove only the description=* tag for now.

I will also reply to your PM later.

Best regards,
Pascal
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-31 19:17:19+00:00): Thanks Pascal!
shinjiman (2025-10-02 01:06:54+00:00): These are the new bus stop locations, the old bus stops are just next to Fourth Road.
Please see note 4928603 for details.
nevw (2025-09-29 04:50:15+00:00): Hi, map the outline of the house when adding houses instead of outlining the property plot. I have fixed both your edits.
cswilson252 (2026-05-21 16:36:25+00:00): I reverted this because abandoned railways that don't exist anymore are better suited for OHM.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182985159
Glassman (2025-10-02 01:57:23+00:00): nice fix!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172590130
otherside_ (2025-09-29 04:14:47+00:00): *17 cameras, I miscounted 13141063514
otherside_ (2025-09-29 05:24:09+00:00): *18 cameras, missed one (corrected in changeset 172593395)
user_5359 (2025-09-29 07:01:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved two nodes more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I reverted the whole change set because there is now comment on the change set.
NeisBot (2025-09-29 04:12:35+00:00): Hi X_223-, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 highway(s)
- 1 building(s)
- 8 natural(s)
- 10 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=172592004
NeisBot (2025-09-29 04:23:35+00:00): Hi X_223-, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 18 highway(s)
- 1 building(s)
- 1 natural(s)
- 1 waterway(s)
- 4 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=172592171
Taksine (2025-10-14 12:38:47+00:00): 你这三天太长了吧
X_223- (2025-10-14 12:47:45+00:00): pls give the dat's update more time
shu0410 (2025-10-15 02:22:56+00:00): 您好，我能从您最近的编辑中看到您确实对云南大学呈贡校区的重做做出了很大贡献，没有完全食言。之后如果需要动这么大的工程，可以删一点改一点，没有必要一次性推倒重来，这样真的会让我们对您大面积删除的动机产生怀疑。
Taksine (2025-10-25 13:04:43+00:00): 不是哥们，你要多长时间啊？三个月？三年？三百年？
NeisBot (2025-09-29 05:06:36+00:00): Hi pyonnn, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Updated bus stop and station amenities"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
NeisBot (2025-09-29 05:30:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-23 02:15:04+00:00): DWG revert - unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175011015
Benoît C MdP (2025-09-29 14:29:16+00:00): Bonjour Yuni

Est ce que cette voie/piste cyclable est vraiment ouverte ? Aux dernières nouvelles, il y avait encore pas mal de travaux avant l'ouverture.  https://api.panoramax.xyz/?date_from=2025-08-29&focus=pic&map=17/48.841831/2.363332&pic=15eb7d14-d5fe-408e-aa38-4e55cfa65639&speed=250&theme=default&xyz=126.84/-1.66/40

As tu vu sur place que c'était ouvert ?

Bonne continuation

Benoît
fortera_au (2025-09-30 01:28:14+00:00): Hey there, just a couple of tips:

If you're adding a bunch of houses in a similar area, it's easier for all to do them within the same changeset.

For addresses in Australia, you don't need to enter the suburb, postcode or state. We have those fully mapped through relations, so adding them onto individual items duplicates that data. No major harm in adding them, but it can save time to just skip them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172594095
NeisBot (2025-09-29 06:03:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
ralley (2025-09-30 00:01:06+00:00): I think the shop tag is also wrong, shop=supermarket seems wrong
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172594321
NeisReview (2025-10-03 13:07:44+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/172790823
YraFyra (2025-10-04 09:38:10+00:00): Hi,
You have re-added roads that are currently gone (removed as part of major road work). What are your sources? Routing in OSM is currently done using roads that does not exist!
I will marked all missing roads as historic:
007Transformer (2025-10-06 16:38:37+00:00): Hi YraFyra,
Thank you for reaching out and making the corrections.
The geometry was re-added based on Public GPS Traces: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172595407#map=17/55.678220/13.179538&layers=G and official information from the Swedish Transport Administration (Trafikverket), which indicated the planned road layout and construction details for the E22 Lund Södra and Väg 108 project: https://www.trafikverket.se/vara-projekt/projekt-i-skane-lan/e22-lund-sodra-och-vag-108/#dokumentand
I understand that the area is currently under construction, and the on-ground situation would differ from both the previous and the planned layouts. Thanks for clarifying.
I also realized before my edits, some route relations were broken due to the construction. Are there any sources regarding the affected route relations as well? I would be happy to collaborate on that and offer my help, if needed.
YraFyra (2025-10-06 20:23:23+00:00): Hi
The GPS traces are at least 4 months old (the possibility to pass over the highway was closed on May 23 2025). Next step of opening up parts of the area will in April 2026.
I don't know the exact details of bus routes. Most bus routes can be found at www.skanetrafiken.se Some of them make detours, others may have ended operation. I suggest to not update the detours.
007Transformer (2025-10-07 07:48:23+00:00): Hi YraFyra,
Thank you for the clarity, noted
joost schouppe (2025-09-29 13:50:37+00:00): Please do not create duplicates. We are getting sufficient remarks about this account to consider asking for it to be blocked until you can make sure the quality improves.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-09-29 14:02:22+00:00): Hello,

We take your comments into account and strive to continuously improve our data.
Kind regards,
The DB Team
joost schouppe (2025-09-29 14:07:17+00:00): Please clarify in what sense you will improve further edits and how you will fix the open issues we already alerted you to.
eggie (2025-09-29 08:13:17+00:00): Dag Longus..

De naam van een buurt zetten we niet op de landuse=residential.
Wijken en buurten (verschil)  worden als place getagd meestal op een node. Soms icm met een vlak en in een relatie gezet.
Zie Tuindorp West.
Tuindorp Oost staat al getagd op een node.
Je toevoeging is dus niet correct.

Een buurt
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=neighbourhood

en voor een wijk..

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dquarter

Verder is hier al een landuse=residential om een groter gebied getagd. 


Verder het je de landuse verbonden met wegen. Dat is niet de bedoeling. Ik zet je wijziging weer even terug.
Het was hier al goed gemapt.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-29 08:15:40+00:00): reverted by changeset #172599192

Kijk even in de wiki hoe buurten te mappen, maar hier staat de buurt al gewoon op een placenode.
Dus geen landuse=residential gebruiken.

MVG
eggie
ilias_ (2025-09-29 10:10:39+00:00): Thanks nona mostafa, there's been an edit war about this road. Just because it's called Autoroute doesn't mean it's an autoroute... I think you would know that better than anyone. For now it's settled.
nona mostafa (2025-09-30 13:34:12+00:00): You're welcome. We are here to make OSM better
Patchi (2025-09-30 05:43:20+00:00): Hello kräckel,

I don't quite understand your modification of the bus relations https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9091032 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9091033. You changed the bus line operator "Rafael Bus" to "Transdev Oise Cabaro". L'Oise is a french department. The opertator Transdev Oise is a child company of Transdev (big transport conglomerate) which operate in the department of l'Oise (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oise), which is in the north of France so that is definitely not the right operator.
Moreover the bus master relation of this bus line https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9091034 still have the operator "Rafael Bus", which is not consistant with the operator of the bus lines and used to be correct.

You should be aware, that the Name Suggestion Index in iD is not always right about its "suggestion" specially for the PT networks and operators. So your other operator name changes in this changeset may be wrong as well (I mean the train relations where you change the operator name). As I'm not a train specialist, I can not say for sure if it is right or wrong.

Best regards,

Patchi.
sosquqer (2025-10-07 13:32:22+00:00): Dear mappers of the geopark! Thank you for your extensive efforts to get the English names on the map, I appreciate it both as a mapper and as an Izu visitor :)
Can you please tell why did you delete the Wikidata tag from the temple in this changeset?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172597480
chinook17 (2025-10-03 02:48:32+00:00): Salut,
Merci pour ta contribution!
N'oublie pas d'enlever les tags lcn=yes de la route et de les remettre sur la nouvelle piste.
emmacardinal (2025-10-17 05:22:50+00:00): Merci beaucoup! Je ne savais pas qu'il fallait faire ça!
user_5359 (2025-09-29 09:14:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition!

You only added the name of a business to the building, but did not note that there is also a business there. No Website and description isn't engouh.  If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://wiki.osm.org.
AgusQui (2025-09-30 03:45:45+00:00): Porque estas poniendo como secondary calles de tierra???
sosquqer (2025-10-07 13:37:58+00:00): Dear geopark mappers, why did you delete relevant wikipedia and wikidata tags?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172598604
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-09-30 16:03:52+00:00): foot=permissive on a pedestrian street is weird, isn't it?

Is it temporary during construction?

Thanks for any explanation. Have a nice day!
emmacardinal (2025-10-17 05:28:24+00:00): I added foot=permissive since even though it's technically a street, public cars don't have access to it, and pedestrians walk on the roadway. There's no sign that allows it, but McGill (the owner of the street) seems to allow it by design. I don't know if it's the right tag though, so let me know if there's a better tag for it.

Also, construction has been completed.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-09-29 13:10:32+00:00): Hi NFZANMNIM, 

are you sure about this changes from admin_level=5 to 6? Can you specify the source? And can you fill the gaps on admin_level=5 or 6, depends which one is appropriate?
NFZANMNIM (2025-09-29 15:04:43+00:00): Hello! So my idea is that, as Pakistan, India, and Bangladesh have equivalent subdivision terminology and hierarchy with minor differences, I want to follow a consistency between them. 

So, in Pakistan and India, each state/province is level 4, and they're divided to "divisions" which are level 5, and these are divided to districts/Zila/Jilla/Jella which are level 6. 

In Bangladesh, for some historical reason, the level 4 and 5 are merged as divisions (eg Rangpur division) and so there's this missing level. But then we have districts/Zila/Jilla/Jella same as in Pakistan and India. 

For the rest of the hierarchy, I followed the order. Sub-district/Upazila and metropolitan city corporation are the next level in the hierarchy, 7. Unions and municipalities are the one after, 8.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-12 07:43:33+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for Dogtopia POI in changeset 184003393

https://osm.org/changeset/184003393
demon_box (2025-10-02 06:07:34+00:00): Ciao Venerdì (Michi), ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti un edificio può avere più entrate e di conseguenza più numeri civici. 
Quindi hai 2 opzioni: 
1. Se conosci esattamente la posizione (entrata) del civico che stai mappando metti tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su un nodo del perimetro dell'edificio (aggiungendo anche il tag entrance sullo stesso nodo);
2. Se invece non hai questa informazione così precisa devi mettere tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su nodo adiacente ma STACCATO dal poligono dell'edificio.
Tra l'altro hai taggato 2 volte il civico 102 e ovviamente non è corretto. Il civico deve essere univoco.
Ho già proceduto con le correzioni del caso. 
Grazie e BuonMapping!
Venerdì (Michi) (2025-10-02 06:13:06+00:00): Buongiorno, ti ringrazio, buon proseguimento :)
vrix (2025-09-30 08:50:41+00:00): Hi, I believe that this changeset caused some issues with the Los Angeles relation 207359. It can't be found in Nominatim anymore https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=R&osmid=207359
Albabord (2025-09-29 08:31:06+00:00): pardon je ne sais pas utiliser le site cette contribution ne sert à rien
nevw (2025-10-02 01:22:20+00:00): Hi, there are a couple of osmi problems to fix here
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.15036&lat=-38.13158&zoom=16
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-03 07:47:21+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118183382/history has roof:type = 1 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
GBAB (2026-02-03 14:50:48+00:00): Hi Mateusz,
it was definitely a mistake, sorry. I have removed the tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178054532
Cheers
Gábor
eggie (2025-09-29 08:46:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Gebouwen worden periodiek geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG. Je kunt dat versnellen middels een verzoek in het draadje BAG importverzoeken op het forum van OSM.
Het adres en de naam = Schuur heb ik verwijderd.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-09-29 08:48:36+00:00): Idem.. Doe een verzoek via het forum. Dan komen de juiste adresgegevens op een adresnode mee. Niet name=  gebruiken op iets te beschrijven Dat is al building=house

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-29 08:52:26+00:00): Geef svp onjuistheden door aan het Kadaster. Dan komt het in OSM ook goed bij herimport.
Een terugmelding kun je hier doen
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Tweekarspelenweg+2&objectId=0007010000003147&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=266947.45289804443&geometry.y=572687.8431115382&zoomlevel=14.136

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2025-09-29 08:57:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-03 13:07:17+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/172790796
custodiankeyy (2025-09-29 19:25:52+00:00): Hotel is already present.
Eftalia Hotels (2025-09-30 07:29:17+00:00): Hello,

It's available, but it's not showing up in your WhatsApp locations.

Best regards
user_5359 (2025-09-30 10:11:22+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1433992036. What is the mean of the tags
BIOME = T
CONS_OBJ = 0
ESTYEAR = 2024
GOV_TYPE = 2
IUCN_CAT = 3
JUR_ID = 9964
LOC = 2
MECH_E = Protected Areas of British Columbia Act
MGMT_E = Government of British Columbia
MPLAN = 0
NAME_E = KIIŠḤNIQʷUS CONSERVANCY
NAME_F = KIIŠḤNIQʷUS CONSERVANCY
NO_TAKE = 0
NO_TAKE_HA = 0
OBJECTID = 18502
OWNER_E = Government of British Columbia
OWNER_TYPE = 2
O_AREA_HA = 11012
PARENT_ID = 590009964
PA_OECM_DF = 1
PROVIDER = 59
QUALYEAR = 2024
STATUS = 1
SUBSRIGHT = B
Shape_Area = 110119572.180008
Shape_Length = 138831.714740567
TYPE_E = Conservancy
ZONEDESC_E = Terrestrial Zone
ZONE_ID = 591009964
?
moyogo (2025-09-30 10:41:43+00:00): Those are from CPCAD. I’ll remove them. Thanks!
streckenkundler (2025-09-29 10:58:47+00:00): Hei,

schau dir mal bitte im Bereich Schwarzer Werg die Radrouten an... da ist einiges unterbrochen: z.B. https://knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/route/15867811 und Spreeradweg... Danke,

Sven
MaGIStokrat (2025-09-29 11:39:51+00:00): Ah, danke für den Hinweis.
Ich hoffe, die Routen sind jetzt wieder richtig verbunden.
Die Beschilderung ist da hinten im Walde IMHO zudem etwas inkonsistent, wie ich finde.
VG
streckenkundler (2025-09-29 12:08:26+00:00): Hei,

Danke, siehr gut aus... bei der Knotenpunktseite siehr man immer so nach ca. 10 Minuten, wenn war repariert ist...

Danke, Sven
eserte (2025-09-29 19:34:48+00:00): Hallo,

kannst du dir https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1047402016 und die benachbarten Ways anschauen --- hier ist das Tagging für "Gehweg für Radfahrer frei" anscheinend verloren gegangen...

-- Slaven
fmc_9 (2025-09-30 13:26:24+00:00): Hi
ich hab den Weg separat erstellt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1433997336

Deshalb ist an der "Centerline" nur noch sidewalk:both=separate über geblieben weil die ganzen Details sind an den neuen footways sind.

Ist das aus deiner Sicht so in Ordnung?
eserte (2025-09-30 13:29:29+00:00): Ah, ok, dann ist es natürlich in Ordnung.
NeisBot (2025-09-29 09:36:44+00:00): Привет Zhake_05, добро пожаловать и спасибо за ваш вклад!

Чтобы сделать сотрудничество проще и помочь другим понять ваши правки, лучше добавить краткое описание сделанных изменений. Ясные комментарии помогают сообществу следить за вашей работой и предоставлять более качественную обратную связь. Вы можете найти советы по написанию хороших комментариев здесь[1].

На основе ваших правок карты в этом наборе изменений, я составил предложение о том, как мог бы выглядеть комментарий: "Обновлены атрибуты домов, включая тип здания, и добавлены детали адреса, статус одностороннего движения, поверхность, ограничение скорости и количество полос"
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi Zhake_05, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Updated house attributes, including building type, and added address details, oneway status, surface, speed limit, and lanes"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
stasiu512 (2025-09-29 10:21:25+00:00): Cześć, tag `name` na linii tramwajowej jest odpowiedni? Czy w takim razie nie powinno być takiego tagowania na np Nowej Warszawskiej?
kornad (2025-09-29 10:44:32+00:00): Hej. Dopóki trasa jest w fazie proposed lub construction to nie widzę przeszkód, aby miała nazwę. Później można ją usunąć lub przenieść do 'description'.
Adze1 (2025-09-30 09:07:16+00:00): Thanks.
❤️‍🔥 (2025-10-01 10:35:56+00:00): Hi, bicycle=destination means that you can only cycle here if you're final destination is within this block of streets. i.e., you can't use these roads as a shortcut. See http://osm.wiki/Tag:access=destination

just confirming that this is what you intended? it seems quite unusual, i've never seen such a sign in NZ
EleGlobe (2025-10-03 08:07:04+00:00): Yes I was as bicycles aren't allowed through the front of Tamatekapua Wharenui, the maximum destination from one coming in from the western side is the St. Faith's Church as there's a bike stand below the Graveyard there or to one of the residences there or leaving from there heading out via the western sidestreets, but they cannot go past the Wharenui riding it as it disrespects marae protocol. There is "No Bike Signs" on or by the gates surrounding the Marae Atea. It's odd that a bike stand is within the grounds but I think it's for Marae/Church Destination usage only. People hardly bike through this area as such.
❤️‍🔥 (2025-10-03 10:10:59+00:00): cool, thanks for confirming! just wanted to check, since this tag combination is usually a mistake
gurglypipe (2025-09-29 09:55:11+00:00): Thanks! I know there are a few other comments about semis/terraces which need splitting. I’ve run out of time to do those today, but if you’d like to do it, just enable the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels overlay in ID, set the imagery offset to -0.49,-1.41 (which is what I think the offset is between Bing and Cadastral Parcels for Casterton), and split the buildings. I find it’s easiest to temporarily remove all the tags from the buildings to prevent them turning into multipolygons, then re-add the tags after splitting is complete. :)
Hodgepig (2025-09-29 10:19:58+00:00): Thanks. I'll have a go at that later today.
VictorIE (2025-09-29 17:54:22+00:00): Hi again,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1258583687/history 

The change from building:part=yes to building=yes is problematic - it creates the impression that there is one building on top of another.