piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Heinzsson (2023-06-29 09:44:10+00:00): Hallo! 

An dieser Kreuzung gibt es getrennte Fahrradfahrspuren, die ausschließlich von Fahrradfahrern genutzt werden dürfen, die die ganze Kreuzung überqueren, gemischt mit dem restlichen Straßenverkehr. 
Und es gibt traditionelle Übergänge, die natürlich von den Fußgängern benutzt werden, aber auch von Fahrradfahrern (entsprechend der geltenden Bestimmungen) mitbenutzt werden können (je nach Fahrtrichtung auch müssen) und das auch trotz der exklusiven Fahrradspur über die Kreuzung.
Wollte den Unterschied damit zum Ausdruck bringen. Dass es für Fahradfahrer optional ist, für Fußgänger bindend.
So gesehen könnte man ebenso bei foot=designated angeben, allerdings fehlt dann die Info das es dort verbindlich und ausschließlich ist, da die Fahrradspur nicht mitbenutzt werden kann.
Heinzsson (2023-06-29 09:49:17+00:00): cycleway=crossing access=no muss ein Fehler sein, wenn es sich auf einen der Fahrradstreifen bezieht, denn dieser ist ja definitiv für Fahrradfahrer und deren "access". Fußgänger dürfen diesen dann aber nicht nutzen.
Langlaeufer (2023-06-29 10:30:13+00:00): genau, cycleway ist per default nur für radfaherer.

Einige andere Übergänge sind nur für Fußgänger (footway). und einige sind für Radfahrer-und Fußgänger. Wobei die Fußgänger immer verpflichtend den Übergang nutzten müssen und die Radfahrer die Wahl haben auch die Fahrbahn zu verwenden - da es hier keine benutzungspflichtigen Radwege gibt.
DaveF (2023-07-26 14:30:40+00:00): Please refrain from adding erroneous tags to PROWs
bdentremont (2023-06-29 17:33:34+00:00): What are you doing here?  Cave entrance doesn't seem like an appropriate tag for what your changeset describes as moorings.
jmarchon (2023-06-30 05:47:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Nice work!
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-01 12:35:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/825144243

Is this sandstone machined into a flat surfaces? In such case it would be surface=paving_stones material=sandstone

Or is it surface=sett material=sandstone (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dsett )

Or maybe even surface=unhewn_cobblestone material=sandstone ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dunhewn_cobblestone )

?
Uncle Pain (2023-07-01 12:57:13+00:00): I considered all three options but I found none of them suitable.
For completeness, here is the picture that was attached to the note: https://westnordost.de/p/147692.jpg
You can see that the steps are solid blocks of sandstone, not sett, not paving stones or cobblestones. In Karlsruhe, there are lots of buildings made of sandstone, and often their stairways are made like in the picture.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-04 10:09:16+00:00): hmm, in such case a brand new surface value may make sense

it is not really fitting existing one, but surface=sandstone is also not giving much info

- it is flat and well made
- it cannot be described as paving stones at all (when there is single block per step it still matches a bit but here...)

surface=smooth_carved_stone ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-04 10:09:39+00:00): (maybe it should be discussed more widely)
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-02-28 23:24:43+00:00): No Bing não aparece esta rua: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11012874060 por favor, não desenhe apenas baseado em imagens do IBGE porque elas são MUITO imprecisas. Já falei várias vezes
felipeeugenio (2023-06-28 21:40:17+00:00): Hola
highway=busway impide el ruteo de vehículos normales. Hay que tener cuidado con ese tag, ya que en algunas pistas exclusivas está permitida la entrada de algún vehículo para un viraje. por favor sea cuidadoso.

saludos
felipeeugenio (2023-06-28 21:43:03+00:00): Otra cosa, hay un motivo por el cual los semáforos a veces no están en el cruce mismo. tiene que ver con dar a cada vehículo la línea de detención que realmente le corresponde y no duplicar paradas.

por favor instruirse en este tipo de cosas antes de borrar semáforos. Yo lo voy a corregir ahora, pero por favor incorporarse al chat de la comunidad en el link: https://t.me/OSMcl

saludos
felipeeugenio (2023-06-28 21:52:51+00:00): otro tema, por favor revisar si las entradas y salidas de los corredores que hizo, las cuales corregí, están bien por favor, porque hizo algunos que no tenían mucho sentido desde el punto de vista del tráfico. gracias
felipeeugenio (2023-06-28 22:00:04+00:00): algunas de frentón las eliminé, porque son pistas de viraje, esas dese dibujan de otra manera
Colbertson (2023-06-28 20:22:25+00:00): Ļoti, ļoti lūdzu netaisi spamu ar simtiem maziem changeset.
eggie (2023-07-01 10:28:43+00:00): Dag Wminkes...  Je vraagt feedback... 
Het nieuwe pad heb ik losgemaakt van de landuse residential.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=137894209
Het loopt nog wel door het water. Is daar wel water of is er een brug?
Heet dat veld daadwerkelijk Oudoor sportpark? (Of is dat een beschrijving description=......)?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-01 10:44:04+00:00): Ik heb het iets meer aangepast naar de actualiteit. Er zijn recentere luchtfoto's.
Nog genoeg te doen daar.
MVG
eggie
Wminkes (2023-07-01 12:53:43+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

Bedankt voor de reacties.

Dat water is er wel maar ter plaatste is een dammetje gemaakt (3 á 4 meter breed) met een buis er onderdoor voor het verbinden van het water.
Over dat dammetje loopt dit pad.
(Ik zie dat je dat dammetje al gemaakt hebt. Super!)

Er zijn op het hele grasveld ook nog twee nieuwe waterpartijen gemaakt.
Ik wacht op nieuwe satelliet foto om die evt. aan te kunnen maken.
(Ook dit heb ja al gemaakt zie ik....  mooi)

Er is daar een echt sportpark gemaakt voor de jeugd. Zie foto vh bord hieronder.
Noem het maar gewoon 'Sportpark'.
eggie (2023-07-01 13:01:03+00:00): Oke... duidelijk.
Je moet maar eens op het forum kijken naar het draadje 'best layers voor.....'
Daar staat hoe je een recentere luchtfoto kunt gebruiken. Het klopte overigens verder wel.
De duiker onder het dammetje kun je intekenen als lijnelement met
.. waterway=drain
.. tunnel=culvert
.. layer=-1

Up to you..
Mapse..
eggie
Carto'Cité (2023-08-09 16:04:06+00:00): Bonjour Ben,
Tu as ajouté des doubles sens cyclables à Nemours et j'étais curieux de savoir si tu avais bien observé sur place une signalétique qui les confirme ou si c'était pour des raisons règlementaires liées à la vitesse. S'il n'y a pas de signalétique il ne faut pas les mettre en double sens cyclable 🙂
Merci d'avance pour ton aide et n'hésite pas si tu as la moindre question ou remarque.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
syntex (2023-07-01 10:28:47+00:00): Co to jest?
Mariusz 2M (2023-07-01 11:03:53+00:00): Będą budynki, ale jak dałem "proposed" to się wyświetla, więc zmieniłem na drogę/area, bo to się już nie renderuje.
Mariusz 2M (2023-07-01 11:06:39+00:00): ^^ parking i budynki, jw.
Filip009 (2023-06-29 09:31:51+00:00): Dobrý deň, je už trasa vyznačená, keď ste pridal osmc:symbol a colour tagy?
pos513 (2023-07-06 06:06:54+00:00): Zdravím, mám čerstvo prejdený jeden úsek a nie, nie je vyznačená.
ottwiz (2023-06-28 21:13:43+00:00): and also aligned the coastline, hence the size of the changeset, because I splitted it
pamaca (2023-06-30 13:30:16+00:00): Switching from fuel:def to fuel:adblue involves a transition to a different type of fuel additive. Adblue is commonly used in diesel vehicles to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions. To learn more, you can refer to the Wiki page on Adblue. Additionally, you may explore the DISC personality test for a better understanding of personality traits.
https://cowenpartners.com/disc-profile/
MxxCon (2023-07-03 01:15:25+00:00): Hello.
Maxheight tags should be specified only for the section of the road where it's relevant, so the road should be split where necessary.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137895623
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-03 01:20:02+00:00): Good point.  I try to break it best as I can when able, but StreetComplete really needs to add it in and do it automatically.

Thanks for the heads up.
MxxCon (2023-07-03 01:21:29+00:00): StreetComplete does have ability to split roads.
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-03 01:31:54+00:00): I know it does.  I do my best to use the feature, but I wish it would break it up by segment so the user doesn't have to constantly do two breaks at each underpass/overpass.  I'm sure a lot of new users aren't breaking it up either.

I understand the capabilities of SC, just ya know, I feel that it can be tweaked a little.  Oh well.
user_5359 (2023-06-29 06:38:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys).
discontinuity (2023-10-22 20:46:38+00:00): Hey Enderbyte99, I'm really confused by what you're trying to do with these zones. You have, eg, commercial areas on top of residential areas, all the areas are really messy and the boundaries don't make sense, etc. I'm pretty new to mapping in Canada, so I don't know if any of these actually make sense in the context? I've mapped bus stops and buildings and wind turbines mostly in Canada, but like... can you point me to some discussion or tell me what the sources are for what you're doing? Is it coming from some official source so you KNOW what's commercial and residential vs grassland? I see this super messy "areas" issue all over - including in Enderby where I also like to map - which is maybe where you're from from your name?

I'd love to better understand the source, purpose, and regionally agreed-on convention for these kinds of things.

Thanks!
Enderbyte99 (2023-10-22 21:03:30+00:00): Hello and thank you for posting your concerns. I am not from Enderby nor have I ever mapped there. 

I apologize for the messiness of my area drawing. I will be sure to rectangle it where I can in the future. My methodology for land uses is such for small areas such as what was mapped here: I draw a residential area around all of the development and then draw commercial on top of that since it usually takes precedence in rendering. I have not seen any particular style guide for this but it seems to work. I once again apologize if this is not permitted.

I know that something is most likely commercial from satellite imagery. If it is in the “boxy” style of low commercial buildings, it has a dedicated parking lot, or it has additional features that are of business, I think I can safely assume that the building is most likely commercial. 

I have not seen any official discussion on this mapping. I have been doing this of my own accord. If conducting large scale land use mapping via satellite imagery is not permitted, I once again apologize. 

Overall, I am not sure of the agreed on convention for BC, I usually look at the OSM wiki or look for regional examples.

I hope this answers your questions.
discontinuity (2023-10-22 21:30:46+00:00): Hey! Just re-read my message, and I'm sorry for being a blunt jerk about your areas :) I've had people write kinda grumpy notes to me, and it sucks, and I should have re-read it and written it in a less jerk-like manner. Thanks very much for your kind answer, and I don't think _you_ have anything to apologize for!

From my experience, the kind of areas you're making are really common in the areas of BC I've been mapping, and I was mostly confused! I think it's partly the messy interconnections: like where the grassland / residential / commercial areas don't line up at all, cross each other, and seem to cross streets and buildings - but it's likely at least some of that is due to the satellite imagery changing, and you working at speed while zoomed out. It's for sure not just your edits that look this way, which is why I wanted to check in to find out what the source is and what the whole deal is since maybe you know a lot more than me! In the end, it sounds like it's totally ok for me to move those borders where I run into issues, and make changes if I find out a restaurant is marked as being in a residential area or something.

I just figured that some of this data maybe came from the government or something, and maybe that's why it was so rough? But I guess not.

As far as I know, satellite mapping is totally ok - at least it's what I've been doing a LOT of, when I'm not wandering around with streetcomplete.

And too bad my guess about your name was wrong :) My grandma's from Enderby, which is why I love to map there. But it's a small place, so no wonder you're not actually from there!

Thanks again for your answer, and I'm sure we'll run into each others' edits in the future!
silversurfer83 (2023-06-29 07:56:43+00:00): Moin MisterEd :)

hat sich die Verkehrsführung geändert? Auf den halbwegs aktuellen Bildern vom Straßenniveau lässt sich erkennen, dass man vom Parkplatz Logo/DM nur auf die Rodheimer darf, aber nicht von der Rodheimer auf den Parkplatz. Die Zufahrt zur Jet ein paar Meter südlich hat jedoch keine Einschränkungen. Bist du dir sicher, mit deinen Einbahnstraßen?

Grüße
silversurfer83

(antworten einfach an diese Mail oder auf den Link nach "mehr informationen zu..." klicken)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137896317
MisterEd (2023-06-29 20:27:19+00:00): Hallo silversurfer83, 

vielen Dank für Deinen Hinweis. Ich schaue mir die Sache Morgen vor Ort an und werde spätestens am Wochenene eine ggf. nötige Korrektur vornehmen.

Beste Grüße
 MisterEd
MisterEd (2023-07-01 12:28:03+00:00): Hallo silversurfer83,

ich habe die Verkehrsführung heute vor Ort überprüft. Sie ist so, wie von mir eingetragen.

Gruß
 Mathias
silversurfer83 (2023-07-01 12:33:19+00:00): Hallo Mathias,

Danke :)
dmich9 (2023-07-04 16:33:44+00:00): Hey Alex, thanks for your detailing work in southend. Is there any reason you are adding the sidewalks, but not the crossings? Thanks
alexwohlbruck (2023-07-18 16:20:49+00:00): @dmich9 Hey, I have added a few crossings around the main arterial roads, but I think its a good foundation to have the sidewalks mapped first. I will mark some more crossings at intersections. Will this help with pathfinding?
docjay (2023-08-10 12:53:16+00:00): Hi Alex, you might want to double-check your image alignment or something as some of the trees are placed inside buildings like this one (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11013083897) or added as part of the building way like this one (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11013083936). Thanks!
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 06:05:34+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11013023902/history has shop = boutique that was added in this edit
shop=boutique? Is it shop selling clothes? Then maybe shop=clothes would fit well, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=clothes

Or maybe shop=fashion_accessories ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=fashion_accessories ) would fit better? Or shop=bag ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=bag ) ?

Or is it some completely different type of shop, with tag used as "boutique" is French word for shop? In such case see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for some documented values.

For shop=boutique info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=boutique page
IguanaPablo (2023-07-06 16:01:31+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-03-14.
tux67 (2023-07-10 11:58:10+00:00): Hallo dritter,
bevor du da was änderderst und "verbessert" dran schreibst - versuch doch bitte den Kontext zu verstehen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:bus_bay
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137896893
dritter (2023-07-11 22:02:51+00:00): Hi tux67,

Ich vermute Du spielst darauf an, dass ich übersehen habe, dass das Tag bus_bay nur auf Linien (und nicht auf Punkten) zugeordnet werden kann.
Ich habe versucht meinen Fehler in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138397054 zu korrigieren.

Danke für den Hinweis,
dritter
tux67 (2023-07-13 11:13:27+00:00): Danke - im Wesentlichen hattest du auch der Flächer der Bus Bay den highway=service "entzogen" 
"Für physisch getrennte Haltebuchten vom normalen Fahrweg sollte ein highway=service angelegt werden. "
Gruß
tux67
impiaaa (2023-07-20 02:20:37+00:00): amenity=place_of_worship is an inappropriate tag for individual classrooms for one church. That implies that they are all each their own church.
Black_Diamond (2023-07-20 07:17:51+00:00): When I talked with a worker here, it sounded more like a collective of several religious organizations here. They are actually separate churches here *and* there are classrooms for the Academy. There's a Spanish speaking church here and an Ethiopian church here too. One of the rooms hosts mass for kids too. They host the main mass in the main building, and they have banners advertising the time of the services for each room. That sounds like different places of worship to me.

It's an unusual place. The Home Church expanded into the shopping center as the other businesses left. The Home Church is the main organization here managing most of the property, and a lot of the rooms are multi-purpose. Only the café and KFC are the businesses that are left here.

When I talked to a person that worked here, Second Harvest food distribution also happens on Friday mornings (https://www.thehomechurch.org/care-support/food-ministry), and Trail Life Troop 337 meet here.

I'd like to request that you not remove this part of my change because these rooms are separate places of worship. The offices to the south are not a place of worship. If you can clarify what you mean by "one church", maybe we can clarify the data so that there is less confusion. I was certainly confused when I first encountered this collective religious area that isn't really a shopping center.
impiaaa (2023-07-20 18:21:37+00:00): Alright. amenity=place_of_worship is for entire churches, synagogues, temples, etc., and from your description and the time I visited, it seemed like these were all just divisions of the Home Church. If they all have their own services, congregations, etc., then I'll change it back.
Black_Diamond (2023-07-20 19:59:22+00:00): Thanks
Warin61 (2023-06-29 00:37:52+00:00): Hi,

Some of these waterways are used as admin boundaries. 
Would it be better if the 2 features were entered as separate ways?
Tom Brennan (2023-06-29 03:15:24+00:00): I'd say so. Do you have any suggestions as to the best way to do this?
Warin61 (2023-06-30 07:01:25+00:00): The official gov data is 'PSMA' available on the OSM Australian Data page. Get that as the basis of replacing any creek boundaries. 

When you work on a creek .. download the OSM creek, then 'File' 'download along' -(I set it to 1m distance and not more than 1 km)  and using 'more tools' 'replace geometry' replace the old with your new.  This should don the job .. but any side creeks might get displaced where they join the new entry. 
The 'down load along' gets the side creeks and should get any boundaries that use the creek. 

I think that will work.
Tom Brennan (2023-06-30 08:25:47+00:00): Thanks, I will see if I can work out a process.

In the meantime, you identified that some boundaries had moved. What tool(s) did you use for that?
Warin61 (2023-07-01 07:42:30+00:00): When they 'move' they usually brake and show up on https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.13628&lat=-33.74316&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

That updates daily.
aharvey (2024-12-17 23:16:06+00:00): I just noticed that a bunch of these added were already existing, and now we have duplicates.
aharvey (2024-12-17 23:27:34+00:00): I fixed what I could find in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160326846
BubbaJuice (2023-06-28 22:57:43+00:00): also https://www.fs.usda.gov/ivm/
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-15 06:11:25+00:00): Where did you get the reference # info?

I know you got the shape from street imagery, but reference info isn't visible there.

I just want to make sure it is correct - if you know what I mean.

Also, welcome to OSM!
riverobserver (2023-07-15 20:07:01+00:00): Hello, regarding the voltage information JCPL runs a BES Bulk Electric system of  a few 500, essentially all 230 and some 115kv which feeds the rest being 34.5kv substation voltage. Thought this might of been 69kv but clearly wrong. The name is very rough, I need to continue mapping it to figure it out more. Otherwise I hope that answers your question. Oh and if a source is not listed I most likely got the substation name from street level imagery. I had put out some generic map lines at one point working on cleaning them up and adding sources, otherwise essentially all future line mapping will have sources attached or be able to provide them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137898186
jptolosa (2023-06-29 08:59:42+00:00): Hola.

He revertido el uso de highway=busway que has utilizado para el corredor del Transantiago, ya que ese valor sólo debe usarse para transportes del tipo BRT (autobús de tránsito rápido) y no para transporte público del tipo bus urbano.

Saludos.
Graptemys (2023-06-29 15:26:00+00:00): Hi une abeille, welcome to mapping in Montreal. I see you have requested a review for this change.

I believe that when the cycleway is a lane with no physical separation, it should be tagged using cycleway:*=* tags on the main highway way. I haven't done much cycleway tagging myself, so check the wiki and other cycling infrastructure in the area to see how it's done. However, it looks like 16e Avenue already had the cycleway tags so now that infrastructure is double-tagged.

Also, be aware that aerial imagery can be out of date. For example, the cycleways on Christophe-Colomb have been removed and are now being rebuilt since the imagery was taken. I'm not sure about 16e Avenue but there was some construction at Parc Étienne-Desmarteau in the imagery so I assume some things may have changed. It would be appropriate to check the site before mapping it in this case.

Finally, when aligning features to Bing imagery in Montreal, please use an offset of 0.6, -1.54. This can be set in the "Imagery Offset" section of the "Background Settings" panel in the iD editor.
une abeille (2023-06-29 15:31:20+00:00): Ah, I was following the convention I saw on Avenue Laurier. I do pass by that park weekly.

I will change my offset now, thank you.
moje_konto (2023-06-29 13:50:43+00:00): Przeniosłeś salon kosmetyczny z punktu na cały budynek, a za razem usunąłeś teren usługowy.

Jeżeli cały budynek jest salonem, to teren usługowy był tym bardziej w porządku.

A jeżeli tylko w części budynku jest salon, to lepszy był punkt, bo można go ustawić w faktycznej pozycji i dodać konkretne piętro.
LockOnGuy (2023-06-29 04:08:25+00:00): Hello ڕاستی, Please use good changeset comments that explain what you edited and why, with the source to back up the edit, I see you edited over 800 objects here with tens of tags changed, your changeset comment doesn't explain the changes you made, for example:  
For nodes 9453485217, 8566924017, 10659935405, etc.. may I know why you removed the Arabic name entirely?           
For nodes 5362350439, 5410873350, 5832950396, 7263485543 etc.. may I know why did you delete 'addr:country' tag?     
And for way 771614591, 789786468, nodes 10117135317, 10117135317, 10812658505, etc.. why did you delete "addr:postcode"? it's a valid postal code in Erbil.     
And you added tens of false postal codes, like way 789911116, 789911118, 789916157, 789916443, etc... the "postal code" you added is just the neighborhood (mahala) number and street/alley (zoqaq) number and the house (dar) number, these are not postal codes, and each one has its own tag and they shall not be put in "postal code"                  
May you please explain this edit of yours or at least the points I mentioned above?       
Regards.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-20 11:59:30+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/365382161/history has n=Rail Baltica key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?