piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-06-11 10:16:16+00:00): Moin Tatrafan_2050,

bitte lösche keine POI-Nodes und übertrage die Daten nicht an den Gebäude-way. Die getrennte Erfassung von Gebäude und POI als eigenständige Objekte ist vollkommen OK und hat seine Vorteile. Besser wäre es die gesamte Tankstelle als ein way zu erfassen. Schließlich gehören auch die Zapfsäulen zur Tankstelle. ;-)

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
Tatrafan_2050 (2025-06-11 14:28:47+00:00): OK, alles klaro
sheldonelectric (2026-04-21 15:33:14+00:00): If the POI has only 1 name, we do not define in which language it is. For example a shop does not have name:it=Armani but just name=Armani
CRCulver (2026-04-21 16:44:06+00:00): No, name= tags should be in the local-language name, which in Greece is Greek. Therefore this name (or at least the “Test Site” part of it) should be in Greek, and the English name should go into a name:en tag.

Doing this and leaving the name= tag blank will also generate a note in the Osmose layer prompting mappers to determine the correct local-language name of the site and supply it in the name= tag.

Therefore, I have reverted your change in changeset 181636643.
sheldonelectric (2026-04-22 17:27:10+00:00): If there is no secondary name in another language, the one and only name goes as name=* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
CRCulver (2026-04-22 17:31:12+00:00): As I said, the primary name for this POI would be a Greek one. The name applied to the POI is a secondary name. The name:en tag is the appropriate place for it.
sheldonelectric (2026-04-22 17:41:44+00:00): A vast number of POIs in Greece don't have a greek name, including this one. When there only 1 name in English, Spanish, Italian, or Arabic, it's not a name:en name:es name:it or name:ar.
It's simply a name.

Provide me a wiki link which shows that when the name is only in 1 language then we must specify which one.
sheldonelectric (2026-04-22 17:44:00+00:00): With your logic, this should not be a name but a name:fr https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3245165189 ??
CRCulver (2026-04-22 17:46:16+00:00): How do you know that this site does not have a Greek name? I personally surveyed this sight last year and was unable to find any signage. As I said above, it is likely that at least the “Test Site” portion of the name should be in Greek; whoever added the name resorted to English and did not respect the rule that OSM names in name= tags are the local-language name.
sheldonelectric (2026-04-22 17:51:25+00:00): I surveyed the local greek speaking owners, they use the english name even in a greek sentence. They did not make up greek name for their place.
sheldonelectric (2026-04-22 17:52:54+00:00): Their name is also on their website.
CRCulver (2026-04-22 17:56:39+00:00): Though I still think that using English in a name= tag in Greece is undesirable for a number of reasons within and beyond OSM, surveying the owners counts as a Source for an edit, so you should have written this under changeset 181633625 and thereby we could have avoided this entire thread.
sheldonelectric (2026-04-22 18:10:00+00:00): Or, you can FIRST survey the owners IF they have a greek name and THEN correct the POI accordingly. Never do the opposite.
CRCulver (2026-04-22 18:17:55+00:00): Nope, as I said, even if I had surveyed the owners, I would have deemed their use of an English name in Greece, when there’s a perfectly suitable Greek expression for “Test Site”, inappropriate. But I’ll let your edit stand now that there is a source.
MarinoBM (2025-06-10 11:38:24+00:00): 
Hola rut94, Bienvenido y gracias por colaborar en mejorar los datos de  OpenStreetMap.
Puesto que empiezas ahora, quiero hacerte unas recomendaciones para las siguientes ediciones:
Los PDIs se colocan como un nodo dentro del edificio y junto a la puerta.
Hay que procurar completar las etiquetas de los PDIs. Que por lo menos tengan el nombre y el tipo de local que es. Mejor todavía si se pueden poner más datos, como teléfono, página web,…
Aquí tienes una pequeña guía de inicio
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_del_principiante_1.2.2
Si tienes alguna duda la puedes consultar en el grupo de Telegram de Castilla y León
https://t.me/osmcyl

Un saludo.
LocalMapGuru (2025-06-11 00:17:14+00:00): Hi there.

I noticed that you added new lines in the area (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1393387401#map=18/43.711608/-84.487514) yet they don't connect at either end nor do they accurate point towards the correct substations.

Would you please check your work and provide your source for this line change?
MassCartog (2025-06-09 15:42:45+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM, I see you're a new user, please don't use the "Name' Tag field to label things, It's used for features that have a universal agreed on name, like a park or location. Also, adding features or tags for the benefit of a game is not allowed. Stick to only real names and features that exist on the ground.
map per (2025-06-09 05:48:47+00:00): Hallo AP_MUC,

bei Gebäuden mit unterschiedlich hohen Gebäudeteilen kann man 'building:part' (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building:part) für die 3D Modellierung verwenden.

Viele Grüße
map per
mf8s003j (2025-07-03 04:41:55+00:00): This changeset just completely detached several bus routes. So many of your changesets have been so destructive. It's really frustrating.
JiahuiY (2025-07-03 04:52:55+00:00): Due to major ramp rerouting and redesign, many routes have been permanently changed, and at least the previous bus stops and busway have been permanently demolished. If anyone is familiar with the new bus routes and can update them, it would be greatly appreciated.
gmar5 (2025-06-09 08:39:42+00:00): Same comment here as here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167373137#map=18/51.753797/-1.260346&layers=N

I can revert those deletions, if you want. Can you confirm whether those places are all vacant? Or have they been replaced?

Thank you.
ist410 (2025-06-09 09:02:46+00:00): Good morning! If you can revert these deletions it would be great. As far as I know, most of them are vacant, but not all.
gmar5 (2025-06-09 08:36:32+00:00): Hello. 
Please do not delete nodes, if the physical place is still there. If the shop or restaurant is gone, it can be tagged as vacant or disused (see the wiki). That makes updating much easier and preserves the history.
citrula (2025-06-09 06:01:24+00:00): welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. To add tags to only part of a way, you need to split it first - you can do this by creating a node on the way where you want to split at, and then right click the node and select "split". I went ahead and did that for you. Happy mapping!
Tijgerd (2025-06-11 06:34:51+00:00): Heey A67-A67,
Technisch gezien is de Jubileumstraat die over de Molenbeek gaat een brug toch..?
A67-A67 (2025-06-21 21:21:27+00:00): Hoi Tijgerd,
Sorry voor de late reactie. Alle kruisingen tussen beek en weg waren hier als brug en als duiker ingetekend. Dat is verkeerd, het is of een brug of een duiker.

Bij de Jubileumstraat is het een twijfelgeval. Ik kan de constructie niet goed zien, maar het lijkt inderdaad een brug te zijn i.p.v. een duiker.
pootriarch (2025-06-08 23:35:39+00:00): this removes some of the turn-restriction relations around market toward southbound church, which now is tagged as cycle-only. this also was flagged by a note. could use confirming eyes
L'imaginaire (2025-06-09 07:15:12+00:00): 👍 Ik probeer nog eens te passeren met de GoPro Max. Ondertussen tonen de "voorlopige" nieuwe luchtfoto's ook al vrij veel.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2025-06-10 12:51:36+00:00): Je kan beter nog eventjes wachten, het gebied zelf is nog afgezet. In september is de opening gepland, dus best wachten tot dan
L'imaginaire (2025-06-10 13:00:23+00:00): 👍🏻
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-11 05:33:57+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18333
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-20 22:04:57+00:00): Have you discussed this import with local community?

Is it intentional that you mass used an amenity tag not really used  before?

See https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=retail%20shops#map

what is the source of this import and its license?

Are you aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-20 22:05:15+00:00): See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tagging-innovations-amenity-retail-shops/131654
chiho_kang (2025-06-21 01:13:49+00:00): I did not import any data. I was only correcting address tags for existing features that seemed to have been imported incorrectly in the past.

Also, I was not aware of the ongoing discussion regarding this tag.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-21 09:17:49+00:00): Sorry, apparently I am an idiot and wrote on wrong changeset. Sorry!
chiho_kang (2025-06-21 11:16:57+00:00): Never mind, thank you for noticing the issue!
Timmy_Tesseract (2026-03-06 06:20:09+00:00): It would be possible to map this scenario with conditional access tags.  

Something along the lines of (just used random times for the example):
foot=no + foot:conditional=yes @ Su 05:00-12:00 + bicycle:conditional=yes @ Su 05:00-12:00 + motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ Su 05:00-12:00
eggie (2025-06-09 04:56:00+00:00): Dag John,

Het is altijd lastig als een restaurant en een hotel het zelfde adres delen.
InNederland taggen we bij op de adresnode. De info van het hotel heeft nu een aparte node. Dus niet meer op de gebouwomtrek.
MVG
eggie
ralley (2025-06-09 02:28:00+00:00): Correction: source was LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery
Lenny Andreu (2025-06-09 19:53:35+00:00): Hola Coniiiiiiii, bienvenida a OpenStreetMap! lamento comentar para esto, pero el cambio del mapa tiene un problema, se puede registrar una feria, pero no el registro personal de individuos que lo componen, la idea es identificar elementos que existan en el lugar y que corresponan para el caso de una feria, se registra el espacio que ocupa (publico/privado), no las personas que tienen el permiso para su uso (individo), de dejo un ejemplo de una existente:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1332104010#map=18/-33.423787/-70.666123
y aquí la descripción del cómo y qué
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity%3Dmarketplace
crees que puedas añadir ese registro?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167375914
felipeeugenio (2025-06-09 19:57:05+00:00): Añado a lo de Lenny, que las eventuales instalaciones de los feriantes no son permanentes, por lo que no pueden mapearse en OSM.

saludos
eggie (2025-06-09 04:59:21+00:00): Dag John,

Het kan zo wel, maar het is beter om het hotel op een aparte adresnode te zetten en niet op de gebouwomtrek. 
Lastig als de adressen het zelfde zijn. 

MVG
eggie
UltimateRiff (2025-06-09 02:52:01+00:00): also deleted some duplicate building nodes that I missed in JOSM
felipeeugenio (2025-06-09 12:55:52+00:00): Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones.
Pero me cuesta entender qué está tratando de hacer. Montó dos direcciones en una.
Si nos explica podemos ayudarlo. Gracias y saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167376894
Hung Tran 9x0 (2025-06-11 06:46:19+00:00): do you know that this part of 3,5 ring is still under contruction and not offcially open to the public?
Hung Tran 9x0 (2025-06-11 06:47:39+00:00): your edits seems incorrect
dypa (2025-06-15 08:56:17+00:00): При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra

Пожалуйста при внесении следующих правок используйте теги (Размеченный (нерегулируемый) пешеходный переход)
crossing=uncontrolled
crossing:markings=zebra

Заранее спасибо!
aharvey (2025-06-09 05:39:37+00:00): In JOSM, under the More Tools menu there is a "Replace Geometry" tool, which when you select for example a node and a way will automatically move the tags from the node to the way, place the node as one of the way nodes (which helps with retaining the link between the node and way in the history). It's preferable to use that where possible over just deleting the node.
aharvey (2025-06-09 05:40:23+00:00): ah I can see you did that sometimes here, sorry I just saw the ones you didn't first.
ArchangelEkim (2025-06-09 11:27:31+00:00): Ah did I delete some? I was sure I only used the replace geometry tool.
ArchangelEkim (2025-06-09 11:37:38+00:00): Its weird because these were some of the last I replaced and I know I used the tool. Now I want to revert and fix this...
aharvey (2025-06-09 11:52:26+00:00): It's okay, it happens. While it's nice to try and keep the history it's not essential, one can still attempt to reconstruct it via a lookup of the changeset looking at the deleted node's tags and the tags on the way.
ArchangelEkim (2025-06-09 11:57:26+00:00): Yeah okay, plus there is definitely addresses to add in that were missing. I am aware the coles development may have actually changed its address too. But thats from application documents. Not sure where Ill get the actual address from within compliance.
aharvey (2025-06-09 12:09:54+00:00): near the fire hydrants, or on the fire escape maps throughout the building or sometimes within lifts are good places to look
aharvey (2025-06-09 05:18:44+00:00): Did you recently survey this? When I did in June 2024 the new building at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1296216101 was still under construction but there seemed to be a driveway (the one you deleted here) running parallel to the other road (the one you made oneway). Just wanted to check if things have changed on the ground since then.
ArchangelEkim (2025-06-09 11:24:29+00:00): I am not familiar with the driveway, but its possible connected with the one way accessway which I created here (i just joined the two links you had together and aligned it. Ive known this has always been a one way passthrough for the many years I visit the GPs. However Ive only ever taken notice at the link not the driveway you note. Did you have clearer imagery than DCS?
user_5359 (2025-06-09 08:33:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your wrong placed node!
Yog Sot (2025-06-09 21:26:56+00:00): zmieniłes granicę ewidencyjną, bo byłes nieuważny... pewno nie poprawisz. 
Dla osób trzecich najprostszą formą naprawy jest wycofanie całego zestawu zmian. Chcesz innym robić robotę, czy jednak sam poprawisz.  https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=167378890
marw8891 (2025-06-10 09:42:23+00:00): możesz powiedzieć co tu popsułem bo niestety nie widzę, spróbuję poprawic
Govinda (2025-06-09 06:17:37+00:00): kabaka to mandara
❤️‍🔥_import (2025-06-14 10:40:40+00:00): thanks for your edit, i've split the road where it becomes private. for future reference, you can do this yourself in the editor by right-clicking any point and then choosing "split"
Joseph R P (2025-06-11 15:06:05+00:00): I would say that trunk classification is not the best tag for roads like these despite their widths and traffic volumes, as they are still only local roads. In an urban scenario like this, trunk classification should be applied only to major non-freeway highways that serve as major commuter routes to suburban/exurban communities, or as thruways for non-local traffic—essentially the most important non-freeway highways. Think of the sort of roads you'd use to pass through the city or The Las Vegas Valley doesn't have too many examples of these sort of roads considering how remote and freeway-centric it is, but Route 160 out to Pahrump is a good example of a commuter highway to a major satellite town and Route 146 is a viable alternative route to the freeways for traffic traveling between places like SoCal out to Henderson/Boulder City.

Using another, albeit smaller city which has more trunk routes closer to its urban core, Carson City has a few of prime trunk route examples. US 50 in the west heads out to Sacramento—another relatively close-by metro area, US 395 in the south is more remote but links Carson City to major satellite communities like Minden and Gardnerville and eventually towards SoCal, and US 50 in the east links to Fallon—a relatively significant rural town outside of the immediate metro area. What also makes these highways prime examples of trunk roads are that they don't exclusively serve Carson City and provide thruways for long-distance travel (for example, tourists in Reno can pass through CC via US 395 to Los Angeles, or trucks traveling between Sacramento and Fallon can use US 50 through the city). Las Vegas Boulevard, while a major, high-capacity, and famous road in its own regard, is still effectively only a business route for locals and tourists, rather than being a major inter-regional highway like the previous examples.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-06-11 17:08:52+00:00): Interesting. I did not consider the difference between local traffic and other traffic when upgrading these roads to trunk roads. I now wonder if Rainbow Boulevard would be classified as a trunk road or primary road. On the one hand, locals tend to use it more than other primary/secondary roads around the area, such as Buffalo and Jones. On the other hand, Rainbow Boulevard doesn't link Las Vegas to any other cities outside the Valley, if you exclude its freeway links (Summerlin Parkway, US 95/I-11, CC 215/Future I-215). What would be the correct classification for Rainbow Boulevard?
Joseph R P (2025-06-11 20:29:12+00:00): I have considered upgrading Rainbow Boulevard to trunk in the past as well for the reasons you stated, but ultimately I would have to believe that primary is the best classification for it. My initial considerations were its high traffic volumes and that it could be used for getting from Route 95 to the 215 to Highway 160, but it's still primarily local traffic using it, so I decided against it. Even though Rainbow does see more traffic than Durango, Jones, and Decatur, they all have very similar roles in the road grid, and the alternative would be to drop the latter roads down to secondary, which seems a little under-classified in my opinion. I think primary should be fine for all major thoroughfares of this nature in the Las Vegas Valley granted that they are mostly used by and intended for local traffic.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-06-11 21:59:42+00:00): Alright. I'll go ahead and fix these.
GiovanniPen (2025-06-09 07:18:29+00:00): WTF? Now it’s completely incorrect.
ivanbranco (2025-06-09 07:35:36+00:00): I have to agree with GiovanniPen here.
I appreciate your contributions to OSM, but in this case, you've mapped features that don't exist: there are two separate staircases on the sides, not a single one in the center. Additionally, you changed a building:part=terrace area into a way, which is incorrect — building parts must be mapped as areas. This should have been handled by improving the building:part tagging and adding the linear features, not by deleting one to replace it with the other. That approach results in the loss of valid geometry data.
gscholz (2025-06-09 07:43:47+00:00): Hi  ivanbranco,
thanks for your comment, I have reversed my changeset, so you can fix this strange staircase yourself.
Guido
GiovanniPen (2025-06-10 15:47:10+00:00): Dear guido, se sei italiano cercami pure in pvt.
You can find several images about those stairs on the relative Wikimedia Commons category. Feel free to map that correctly
CapC (2025-06-09 06:55:34+00:00): Legal land description is

N 1/2 of 24-39-8-W5
25-39-8-W5
S 1/2 of 36-39-8-W5
CapC (2025-06-09 07:02:21+00:00): SE node:
52.3702666	115.0092417
SW Node:
52.3703027	115.0331941
NE Node:
52.3993551	115.0092394
NW Node:
52.3993932	115.0331684
CapC (2025-06-09 07:03:17+00:00): conversion tool:
https://ags.aer.ca/interactive-data-and-tools/coordinate-conversion-tools/ats-geographic-degrees
SafwatHalaby (2025-06-10 07:42:59+00:00): שלום. הוספתם כאן אזור פיקניק בתוך הים. נא לא להוסיף נקודות עניין לא קיימות למפה.
EneaSuper (2025-06-09 11:36:41+00:00): Ciao, credo che siano le immagini di Bing ad essere le più idonee per l'allineamento.
Pucciotrex30 (2025-06-09 11:41:26+00:00): Ma sulle Bing per adesso la rotonda non c'è proprio.
 Intanto ne regoli il diametro e la lunghezza delle corsie , dopo si potrà anche spostare tutto quanto
EneaSuper (2025-06-09 11:44:54+00:00): Aaahh è vero, è quella nuova, perdonami.

Ok allora, buon lavoro e perdona il disturbo ☺️
A67-A67 (2025-08-13 13:02:17+00:00): Again, please don't add highway=motorway_junction to proposed motorway junctions. The correct tag is proposed:highway=motorway_junction, which had already been tagged.
A67-A67 (2025-08-13 13:02:47+00:00): Reverted.
MassCartog (2025-06-09 15:51:03+00:00): Hello welcome to OSM. In this changeset could you explain more on what you are doing? Looks like you mass removed overhead walking bridges, was this a mistake? They all seem to still exist on the ground. 

Please respond and let us know what you are trying to do.
silversurfer83 (2025-06-09 19:06:21+00:00): Hallo algonquin :)

danke, dass du hilfst die Datenbank aktuell zu halten. Du hast hier darum gebeten, dass sich jemand die Änderung ansieht. Ich mache das mal:

Und dafür möchte ich zunächst von dir wissen, wie der aktuelle Zustand des Weges ist, der hier gelöscht wurde. Ist noch zu erkennen, dass hier ein Weg ist oder war? Wie genau sieht er aus?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167381909
algonquin (2025-06-10 05:19:17+00:00): Hallo silversurfer83.
Ich war vorgestern bei meiner Wanderung an dieser Stelle. Der von mir gelöschte Weg ist zwar noch als Fussweg erkennbar. Jedoch befindet er sich in einem ausgewiesenen Naturschutzgebiet und die Naturschutzbehörde hat dort ein Verbotsschild aufgestellt "Durchgang verboten", zusätzlich zu einem Zaun. Somit "kann" man zwar weitergehen, man darf es aber nicht. Mir war wichtig, dass mich die automatische Navigation von OSM nicht mehr diesen Weg entlang führt. Ist das so okay? VG Stefan
NorthCrab_upload (2025-06-09 07:40:43+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1939104958
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1393460278

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2025-06-09 19:08:33+00:00): Hi :)

weißt du zufällig, welche Art Stecker oder Dose hier vorhanden ist?

Grüße
silversurfer83

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:socket:*
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167383112
jopi56 (2025-06-09 19:28:18+00:00): Leider nicht
Kiesgenießer (2025-06-09 11:39:12+00:00): Hello Tatfahren,
sorry again.
Tatfahren (2025-06-09 13:55:30+00:00): Nicht schlimm, die beiden Luftbilder haben nur wenige Monate unterschied, daher hab ich auch nicht deinen changeset kommentiert, sondern es im stillen korrigiert.
Hb- (2026-03-02 20:44:27+00:00): Warum wurde dieser Wald way/105879012 mit diesem node/12898819854 verbunden?
Heffi (2026-03-03 08:03:52+00:00): Dieser Weg ist vorhanden und so vorgefunden worden. Also benutzbar sogar mit einer Brücke über den Fluss.
Hb- (2026-03-03 08:19:55+00:00): Gefragt war zu einem neuen und wahrscheinlich falschen) Punkt Waldrandes, geantwortet wurde zum Weg?
silversurfer83 (2025-06-09 19:12:23+00:00): Hi Steve,

you're currently removing the wikidata and wikipedia links from boundary relations and you only leave two chinese characters that duckduckgo translate as "richtig" as a comment. 

Please explain, why you do this and please stop until you explained. Also: If you map outside of China, please use the local language or english in your comment. Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167383623