piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hufkratzer (2023-12-23 17:34:42+00:00): Hi,
die 3 Flächen, die du hier als Reitanlagen (leisure=horse_riding) gemappt hast, sehen eher aus wie Reitplätze bzw. Round-pen's (kleine runde). Für Reitplätze gibt's in iD ein Preset mit dem sinnigen Namen "Reitplatz", welches die dafür üblicherweise verwendeten Tags leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian setzt. Bitte achte auf die Wahl des korrekten Presets, je nachdem, was du mappen willst. Vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
mathesoft (2023-12-26 14:59:24+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis.
Manchmal finde ich es schwierig, den richtigen Tag zu finden, was ich denke, das ich meine...; gerne darfst du es korrigieren.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-01-07 23:54:53+00:00): Reviewed Please don't delete roads to add new ones. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145442068
WoSoe (2023-12-23 17:08:41+00:00): Hi HAmap,
den Pfad und das natural=scrub hattest du bereits gestern eingetragen. Siehe hier:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145417815

Mit diesem Änderungssatz sind beide Objekte jetzt doppelt vorhanden.

Gruß WoSoe
HAmap (2023-12-24 10:58:56+00:00): Hoppla,
ich hab mich schon gewundert und vermutet, dass ich zwar eingezeichnet aber nicht abgespeichert hatte ... flicke ich wieder, danke für den Hinweis!
HAmap (2023-12-25 12:48:45+00:00): Hallo @WoSoe,
vielleicht stelle ich mich doof an, aber ich sehe nur eine Fläche natural=scrub. Hast du die überflüssige heraus genommen?
Gruß HAmap
WoSoe (2023-12-25 13:05:44+00:00): Servus HAmap!
Hab heute morgen zwei unnötige Multipolygone (u. a. das landuse=residential von Pfeiferhütte) in dem Bereich aufgelöst. Da hab ich das doppelte natural gleich mit gelöscht.
Hier der Änderungssatz:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145487092

Sorry für die Verwirrung.

Gruß WoSoe
HAmap (2023-12-25 13:52:59+00:00): Kein Problem, das bedeutet ja, dass ich doch nichts übersehe ;-)
Unnötige Multipolygone auflösen - sehr gut! Da war ich in der Gegend auch schon dabei.
A67-A67 (2024-01-13 19:49:25+00:00): Bedankt voor de toevoegingen. 

Kun je de volgende keer er wel op letten dat je de landuses niet vastplakt aan de wegen? Het kost namelijk best wel wat werk om het weer los te maken en de bermen tot de rand i.p.v. het midden van de wegen te laten lopen.
Joopvdl (2024-01-15 20:49:43+00:00): Dat is een bewuste keuze van mij geweest en ik zal ook uitleggen waarom.

Ik kan mij 2 verschillende standpunten bedenken.
1. We moeten heel precies mappen wat er daadwerkelijk is. Dat betekend je stopt met het gras bij het begin van de stoep.

2. De weg grenst direct aan het gras en zou daarom ook in OSM aan elkaar mogen grenzen (highway tegen area)

Zoals je wellicht gemerkt hebt werk ik volgens standpunt 2. Gras eindigt waar de stoep van de weg begint. Dat betekend heel kort door de bocht dat het gras direct aansluit op de weg. Dit is feitelijk niet anders dan gras wat aansluit op een gebouw, parkeerplaats of rivier. Dit is allemaal verbonden met hetgeen waar het op aansluit.

Op de weg kan via het aantal lanes of met de width een grove indicatie gegeven worden over de breedte van de weg. Hierdoor kunnen (gebeurd volgens mij niet) renderers deze breedte van de weg en daarmee de aansluiting op het landuse realistischer weergeven.

Als je gaat voor argument 1 geef je eigenlijk aan dat er niks bestaat tussen de rand van het gras en de weg, dat is feitelijk onjuist.

Ik sta open voor jouw argumentatie en beredenering.
eggie (2024-01-16 07:07:17+00:00): PB gestuurd.. met als suggestie 
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway
Prusaker (2024-02-11 14:21:57+00:00): Магазин Три цены перенесли в новое место по адресу Ленина, 43 (он уже там обозначен). А в этом здании находится только Хит и большет нет ни одного магазина.
AlegK (2024-02-11 14:35:57+00:00): В Березе два магазина "Три цены".  Один по адресу Ленина,43. Другой по адресу Ленина, 93 (в подвальном помещении) в одном здании с "Хит! Экспресс".
AlegK (2024-02-11 14:36:47+00:00): Если потребуются снимки - могу их представить
Prusaker (2024-02-11 14:38:56+00:00): Хм, лично перед новым годом ходил смотреть на Хит (и в сам магазин заходил). И не видел там других магазинов...
Prusaker (2024-02-11 14:40:29+00:00): Ну ладно. Может я проглядел магазин в подвале. Тоже бывает.
AlegK (2024-02-11 14:42:18+00:00): Вход с торца в подвальное помещение под "Хит! Экспресс"
AlegK (2024-02-11 14:43:40+00:00): https://3ceni.by/contacts/bereza/
Prusaker (2024-02-11 14:43:57+00:00): Значит я пропустил этот вход. Спасибо. Буду знать.
citrula (2023-12-23 17:00:33+00:00): Hi BreannaWolf, you can add your house by mapping a building and using the addr tags. The wiki is a valuable resource for this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:*#How_to_map  Happy to answer any questions you have !
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145442644
citrula (2023-12-23 22:04:07+00:00): I added this as an address point since the aerial imagery is not updated enough to trace the building outline. You can view my edit here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145451818
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145442644
maraf24 (2023-12-24 16:03:30+00:00): Jeszcze na Wystawowej trzeba przywrócić.
DaveF (2023-12-23 19:08:28+00:00): Hi
There are now three entities representing Gravesend Life boat Station. Two added by you.

I note the boats are moored on the pier's pontoons, but do you know where the actual office build is located?
Smudge the Cat (2023-12-27 15:28:35+00:00): Hi, Thanks for your comments, I did try to add this item previously, but it failed to publish, that is possibly why there are two entities, with regard to an office am not sure of its location, they do have a local number but as yet not answered, i would assume it is either somewhere on the Royal Terrace Pier or within the adjacent PLA building, unfortunately neither of these buildings are open to the public, i will find out, and mark up suitably when, I do so, although this may now be after the Christmas holidays.
DaveF (2024-04-07 01:14:23+00:00): Hi
Did you manage to check the location?
YomanNH (2025-06-19 17:52:17+00:00): Hej,
skoro "nie ma tu chodnika, nawet w budowie" na drodze https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52295246/history, to dlaczego jej nie usunąłeś, tylko dodałeś nic niewnoszącą informację?
maraf24 (2025-06-19 19:17:55+00:00): Po co piszesz ten komentarz pod starym zestawem zmian, zamiast poprawić?
YomanNH (2025-06-19 19:48:22+00:00): Chociażby dlatego, że na zdjęciach lotniczych bardzo dobrze widać chodnik i schody, wbrew temu, co napisałeś w notatce we wspomnianym wcześniej chodniku.
maraf24 (2025-06-19 20:30:20+00:00): A te zdjęcia były zrobione w grudniu 2023 roku?
YomanNH (2025-06-19 20:38:36+00:00): Nawet na zdjęciach z 2024 roku nadal są schody i chodniki.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-23 17:52:44+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11446559171/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
crushtheserpent (2024-02-15 20:38:39+00:00): Why did you add a post office node duplicating an already-existing node (358826219) for that post office? They have the same information. Please delete your duplicate node and add any new information or edits to the previously existing post office node (358826219).
crushtheserpent (2024-02-15 20:55:44+00:00): Additional question: why were so many benches added in areas where there are none, such as in the middle of sports pitches or along city streets on private property? Were these supposed to be tagged as something else?
Kovoschiz (2023-12-24 07:54:10+00:00): You misunderstood this. There is already `telecom=` on the `landuse=industrial` https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/854227561 of the site. That `industrial=` is for the `building=` , because I don't agree with `building=data_center` yet. This would cause duplicate `telecom=` features.
vectorial8192 (2023-12-25 06:05:01+00:00): The wiki currently suggests simply "building=yes" with "telecom=data_center". (I would prefer to have something like "building=telecom", but that would be for another time.)

I personally believe OSM items should be self-explanatory, so that, eg, it is reasonably easy to locate "data center buildings" via Overpass Turbo. If we go for "avoid duplicated tags" then it would be difficult to locate buildings inside data center land uses (search "telecom=data_center" -> for each area find buildings within polygon -> for each building reject if is non-generic building).
Kovoschiz (2023-12-25 10:09:36+00:00): On the contrary, this cause duplication on finding data centers. You still have to de-duplicate them. If there is no site drawn, only individual buildings, this becomes impossible. `telecom=data_center` is conceptually one facility. 
Your example still doesn't qualify them. Does it matter if there's a separate building for the internet connection or control room? Is it "part" of the data center? Also for size, you want to count floor area, not number of individual structures.
It's very common flaw to specify such `building=` to be one-to-one with the facility. This won't do what you want, because people will still tag everything inside a `telecom=data_center` as `building=data_center` blindly. I recently discussed `building=fire_station` , and it may be used on all buildings, not only the main fire truck depot building with duty station. 
It is a very common documentation shortcoming to require combination with `building=` . `man_made=works` was once such case, later corrected to be used on the entire site. 
Problems with `building=data_center`:
https://taghistory.raifer.tech/?#***/building/data_center 
1. Significant use come from mass modifications 
2. Only ~350 in 2020 
3. Relatively small number for a  `building=` 
4. Continued issue with British vs American English 
I find it prudent to exercise caution on creating more `building=` . 
Relatedly, it already won't work for  `telecom=exchange` . `building=exchange` is meaningless. Creating `=*_exchange` for `=telephone_exchange` etc is unscalable.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-23 17:11:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Bohaterów":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11446580211
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11446584405
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11446584440
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11446584475
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11446584511
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11446584542

"Malinowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11446584271

"Kazimierza Wielkiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11446584288

"Ignacego Paderewskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11446584304

"100-lecia":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11446584322

"Marszałka Piłsudskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11446584342

"Pod Gruszą":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11446584532

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Ktr101 (2025-10-03 02:55:51+00:00): Is there a reason that this is signed U.S. 26, such as a local map or street sign, as that seems a bit odd to sign on this stretch.
aselvadeasfalto (2023-12-31 15:19:19+00:00): Olá PedroMTG13,

Tenho visto o trabalho meticuloso que vais fazendo pelo Porto e reparei que mapeias áreas não impermeáveis dos lotes com leisure=garden. Concordo com essa tag e faço o mesmo, mas eu adiciono também as tags garden:type=residential e, crucialmente, access=private. Isto dá mais qualidade aos dados e permite executar queries que distingam estes polígonos de jardins públicos.
Visto que a geometria já dominas, gostarias de passar a adicionar essas tags nas tuas edições? Deixo a sugestão.

Obrigado e boas passagens,
Selva
PedroMTG13 (2023-12-31 18:12:51+00:00): Olá aselvadeasfalto, agradeço o elogio e concordo com a abordagem. Gostava que existisse um preset já com essas tags prontas, mas como estou com o iD não consigo fazer, talvez um dia que transacione para o JOSM. Estás a vontade para fazer a edição em massa desses polígonos a minha preocupação para já é na geometria mesmo.

Bom ano
aselvadeasfalto (2024-01-02 22:25:35+00:00): Olá.
Sim, também gostava que houvesse esse preset, mas ainda estou longe de ter experiência nisso.

Entretanto já experimentei uma edição em massa, mas não é tão fácil quanto possa parecer, pois há vários polígonos não correspondentes a "quintais" que têm de ser tirados manualmente das seleções filtradas. Para já, as minhas alterações limitam-se a uma parte de Matosinhos.

Não sei se usas pouco o JOSM por falta de experiência, mas recomendo vivamente a sua adopção, tal como a mim recomendaram há tempos atrás. Além de poderes criares os teus próprios tagging schema, as ferramentas de precisão geométrica facilitam muito o tipo de trabalho que tu (e eu) fazemos.

Cumprimentos,
Selva
PedroMTG13 (2024-01-03 18:48:20+00:00): Obrigado pela sugestão. Já tenho o JOSM instalado mas não me puxa fazer a edição lá, tenho pouca experiência também.
Timurbek (2023-12-24 17:26:19+00:00): Correct, please, from ''Luxury Car Renal in Dubai'' to ''Luxury Car Rental in Dubai'' (letter ''t'' missed), if possible.
Thank you.
mp747474 (2023-12-23 18:00:02+00:00): Hallo,

ein kleiner Hinweis: wenn ein Lokal schließt, dann trägt man nicht einfach (geschlossen) in den Namen ein, sondern löscht den Punkt (mit dem Löschen-Knopf). Das wird eigentlich auch im iD-Tutorial so erklärt.
Raúl Ab (2023-12-23 18:18:25+00:00): a set of hamlets and insolate buildings some of them change in a few time
mmahmud (2023-12-28 16:14:43+00:00): Hi, your highway edits are overlapping a lot of buildings and creating a lot of issues. Also, you need to adjust imagery to the existing dataset before creating new highways or adjusting alignments. Kindly fix the issues.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-23 18:40:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11446844654
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11446844655

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
J-MUC (2023-12-23 18:32:25+00:00): ...nursing home
mcliquid (2023-12-26 11:57:17+00:00): Hey there,

I have a cool tip for you: keep your changesets local.

Trust me, it will save you a lot of trouble and make your reviewers happy. Here’s what you need to do:

• stick to one area at a time (like a city, a district or a province)

• don’t cross the border (unless you have a passport)

• upload/save your changes before you hop to another place

Why? Because size matters when it comes to changesets. Don’t believe me? Check out this wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for listening, have a wonderful day and enjoy mapping!
pio2_122 (2023-12-23 19:31:52+00:00): The name of this hamlet has been abolished (Dz.U. 2022 poz. 2783).

If you necessarily want to add it, the correct tagging would be: abandoned:place=hamlet or place=locality (only if you are sure someone else uses this name).
Dodko (2023-12-30 10:19:37+00:00): Bolo by dobré zmeniť telefón, web, wikidata ostalo to z predošlej školy.
aceman444 (2024-01-01 11:34:36+00:00): Dakujem, opravene.
misterte (2023-12-23 20:37:37+00:00): Hi,
wieso hast Du den Weg 1233586742 nicht wieder zur Einbahnstraße gemacht, vorne steht doch eindeutig ein Zeichen 220. und living_street bekommt kein maxspeed!
pio2_122 (2023-12-23 19:20:30+00:00): source?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-07 07:12:03+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tej edycji? Czemu zmieniłeś nazwę?

Według komentarza w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146023450 to jest raczej Sowlinka
pio2_122 (2023-12-23 19:10:12+00:00): source?
tyfi (2023-12-23 18:57:40+00:00): It also sneaks into neighboring Lafayette County a bit.
tyfi (2023-12-23 18:58:19+00:00): The overpass was completely unref'd before this changeset.
tyfi (2023-12-23 19:03:26+00:00): I also bumped it to tertiary.
Nakaner (2023-12-24 12:44:10+00:00): Hallo,

ich bin mittlerweile dazu übergegangen, Änderungssätze von MAPS.ME-Nutzern komplett und großzügig zu revertieren, wenn der Änderungssatz in irgendeiner Art qualitativ mangehaft ist (seien es persönliche Notizen, Duplikate oder einfach Müll). Der Kontakt mit diesen Nutzern ist selten möglich und es ist schneller, da einfach per Revert aufzuräumen.

Bei den Nutzern von Organic Maps besteht das Problem interessanterweise nicht.

Viele Grüße

Michael
silversurfer83 (2023-12-24 12:59:26+00:00): Hi Michael,

Ja. So langsam lerne ich das auch.

Kann bei OM auch daran liegen, dass es nicht so verbreitet ist. Ich hoffe aber auch, dass die Datenqualität dieser user wenigstens auf dem aktuellen Niveau bleibt.

Schöne Feiertage :)

Silversurfer83
gscholz (2023-12-25 11:16:10+00:00): Hi déni,
this changeset left a nicely round shaped swimming pool area behind with a kind of rectangular, self intersecting shape:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=6.35614&lat=43.09505&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145447169

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
déni (2023-12-25 21:26:09+00:00): Oops. Corrected with changeset 145511984. I probably did a square operation without noticing the focus in josm was on another way.
Do you know if a validation check for this kind of error can be added to josm ?
gscholz (2023-12-25 21:38:02+00:00): Hi déni, 
thanks for your response. The internal validator of JOSM wil find this but you have to select all items:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Validator

Guido
déni (2023-12-25 22:43:55+00:00): Hi Guido, thanks again. I think I already did that but will check.
misterte (2023-12-23 20:45:46+00:00): und hier hast du aus einem Bach 244846693 einen Feldweg gemacht.
und wie schon mal geschrieben sind ein paar Bäume auf einem Privatgrundstück noch lange kein Wald.
misterte (2023-12-26 15:45:50+00:00): es wäre wohl besser erst Deine Fehler zu beheben bevor Du weiter machst!
Hb- (2024-01-03 11:44:23+00:00): Das ist mittlerweile korrigiert mit #145835837. 
Du bist herzlich eingeladen, sorgfältiger zu arbeiten.
pio2_122 (2023-12-23 19:18:46+00:00): Change without source, notation inconsistent with official data.
hsc666 (2023-12-24 13:31:29+00:00): Sieht gut aus. Ich mach die Note dann mal zu...
maraf24 (2024-01-16 11:10:40+00:00): Zmiany wycofane.
Nakaner (2023-12-24 12:43:51+00:00): Hallo,

ich bin mittlerweile dazu übergegangen, Änderungssätze von MAPS.ME-Nutzern komplett und großzügig zu revertieren, wenn der Änderungssatz in irgendeiner Art qualitativ mangehaft ist (seien es persönliche Notizen, Duplikate oder einfach Müll). Der Kontakt mit diesen Nutzern ist selten möglich und es ist schneller, da einfach per Revert aufzuräumen.

Bei den Nutzern von Organic Maps besteht das Problem interessanterweise nicht.

Viele Grüße

Michael
limes11 (2023-12-24 22:39:46+00:00): Hi Michael,

da hast du natürlich recht. Ich dachte anfangs, es beträge nur wenige POIs. Als ich dann einiges korrigiert hatte und anschließend feststellte, dass fast alles Duplikate waren, hatte ich mich auch geärgert, es nicht pauschal revertiert zu haben...

Nächstes Mal schaue ich gleich genauer hin.

Beste Grüße

Limes
TheDutchMan13 (2023-12-23 19:42:41+00:00): It's suppose to say "Added buildings'
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-23 19:50:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2085823835
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1233612978

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-23 20:00:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2693682871
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/798961225

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-23 20:10:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11447144264

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
grzegorz75jan (2024-03-30 09:36:51+00:00): Witam.
Zauważyłem w twoich edycjach nadmiarowe dodawanie punktów w drogach. Jest to błędne edytowanie. Znakomita ich część jest zupełnie niepotrzebna i jedynie obciąża serwery oraz nawigacje. Jaki jest sens wstawiania punktu co 5 metrów. Gdy nabadźgasz tak przy skrzyżowaniu to nawigacjom puchną kondensatory, gubią się a przeliczenie zaplanowanej trasy lub ponowne przeliczenie po zgubieniu sygnału lub innego błędu trwa bardzo długo. Winna nawigacja czy ten co rysował drogę ? Prostsze odcinki też nie potrzebują miliona punktów. Staraj się unikać łączenia dróg z granicami, obszarami zielonymi. W przypadku iD naciśnij [Alt] i nie dojdzie do połączenia. W wielu przypadkach wystarczyło przesunąć istniejący punkt i połączyć go z inną drogą, chodnikiem bez potrzeby tworzenia nowego na dystansie 2 metrów a nawet mniejszym.
Ta droga oraz skrzyżowanie z sąsiednią to delikatnie ujmując nieporozumienie. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45663209#map=19/49.98595/20.60440
Tak wiem. Ładnie to wygląda na mapie ale nie przy przeliczaniu.

Znakomita część przejść dla pieszych nie ma dodanej zebry.

Pomoce naukowe
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Main_Page

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5&si=dOL
empty_child (2023-12-24 15:49:31+00:00): Hello Beka Beka,
Please, don't fill out name tags with object status. For objects' lifecycle we have a system of prefixes, you can read here about (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix)
trigpoint (2023-12-24 10:47:21+00:00): Hi, this edit has gone very wrong. An unclassified road is usual expected to be metalled. This is clearly a track across an arable field. Only used by tractors and very very unlikely to have public access and even less likely to have public vehicle access.

What sources are you using for these edits and why such a random username?
misterte (2023-12-23 21:52:55+00:00): Hi,
hier ist keine Furt 11447374479, der Bach läuft eindeutig durch eine Röhre unter der Straße!
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-24 00:37:34+00:00): Hello & welcome to OSM! Thanks for your work, but one thing to point out. You've added various roads as minor / unclassified, but all of them look like they should actually be highway=service + service=driveway, as this is what driveways & internal service roads, that aren't usually open to the general public are usually mapped as. Could you please update them? Thanks! Graeme Fitzpatrick, Moderator, 
OSMF Data Working Group
akimapbuilder (2024-01-16 11:00:31+00:00): Hello Fizzie41
Thank you for reaching out and providing valuable insight into the road classifications. 
I changed the road classification, unclassified was not a good option. 
Your input is crucial for maintaining accurate data on OSM, and I'm grateful for your help.
Best regards
akimapbuilder
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-17 00:11:25+00:00): Thank you!
tyfi (2023-12-23 21:04:07+00:00): I also fixed a small segment in U that was still residential.
diamondarmorsteve (2025-06-25 01:03:08+00:00): Why is this road tagged as highway=motorway? It seems a bit short to be a motorway.