piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ratrun (2025-06-21 11:13:53+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167908743#map=10/31.9063/-9.2689
ilias_ (2025-06-21 12:43:09+00:00): Thanks ratrun!
Bence_ (2025-06-19 22:40:30+00:00): source=survey
xkillah (2025-07-09 09:37:58+00:00): Reverted because of the sources violating OSM rules

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168686181
NeisBot (2025-06-28 14:45:49+00:00): Hi User74638, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 4 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=167847038
NeisReview (2025-07-05 18:29:17+00:00): Thank you for your private message and for confirming that the deletions were intentional.

However, the fact that a path or way is not public does not necessarily justify its deletion. In OpenStreetMap, we use access tags to indicate whether a road or path is private.

Could you please undo your changes, or would you like assistance with this?

Ideally, an access=private tag should be added to the paths.

Best regards.
Obninskiy (2025-06-19 22:39:04+00:00): Правка сделана неправильно. Требуется редактирование.
TrickyFoxy (2025-06-21 00:13:32+00:00): А что хотели нарисовать?
Obninskiy (2025-06-21 00:48:37+00:00): Хотел обозначить тоннель под железной дороги, а получилось что поставил точку около...
TrickyFoxy (2025-06-21 12:51:43+00:00): Подчистил. А тоннель нарисован же
Obninskiy (2025-06-22 09:56:10+00:00): Там нарисована водопропускная труба. Маршрут через неё не построить. А на самом деле там тоннель шириной около 3.5 метров и высотой около 6. Таких несколько на территории Калужской области. У них отдельная история. Если интересно - obninskiy@mail.ru.
TrickyFoxy (2025-06-22 15:45:51+00:00): Понял, нарисовал. Не знаю дорога или тропа слева, поэтому нарисовал как тропу
Obninskiy (2025-06-22 16:11:19+00:00): Там сезонная дорога. Чаще она - тропа)) Спасибо за помощь! Удачи!
NeisBot (2025-06-28 14:45:49+00:00): Hi User74638, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 44 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=167847118
rempshaener (2025-06-24 19:25:16+00:00): Hallo,
für diese Information steht das Feld "operator" zur Verfügung.
Viele Grüße
NorthCrab_upload (2025-06-19 23:20:49+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2501095557

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
jeslop (2025-06-20 14:22:53+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167873333
jeslop (2025-06-20 14:22:33+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167873308
cubbe8 (2025-06-20 00:35:05+00:00): This is not complete
aharvey (2025-06-20 04:25:52+00:00): hi could you please reply to my earlier changeset comments about changing the route names? I might ask for wider community feedback, if you could hold off further changes until we get community feedback?
aharvey (2025-06-20 05:38:17+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/public-transport-route-names/131624

if you had any thoughts on the matter if you could contribute to the thread please.
aharvey (2025-06-21 12:12:31+00:00): I've restored the proper name "Dubbo XPT" based on this being the better route name over the artificial route name from PTv2 per community discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/public-transport-route-names/131624
donmac703 (2025-06-30 05:22:58+00:00): Hi Andrew,
I have finally found these notes buried in my gmail feed after getting a message in OSM about them. (They appear in a gmail category that gets 20-50 messages per day, outside of my usual inbox).
Currently, the naming of elements appear to all over the place. It is only when they are seen in summary form, by using a tool such as PTNA can the scope of the inconsistency be seen.
aharvey (2025-06-30 05:38:33+00:00): No problem. My main issue is that name="Train 427: Dubbo XPT" isn't what these routes are known as on the ground, in common local knowledge or in official documentation, it's an invented name purely from PTv2. We should be using route names that closely match what the route is known as on the ground or referred to as in documentation like official websites, timetabling etc.

If people want a name in the "Train 427: Dubbo XPT" format they can easily build this as `${mode} ${ref}: ${name}` or whatever other format they like.
Jordi MF (2025-06-20 12:59:10+00:00): Hola,

¿Cuál es la fuente de datos para poder delimitar exactamente los límites administrativos que se han añadido?

Al ser límites administrativos que no pueden comprobarse presencialemente, es importante que en OSM conste a partir de qué documentos oficiales se han obtendio.

Saludos
aTarom (2025-06-20 13:08:03+00:00): Hola, por favor contesta los mensajes que te han indicado, es fundamental para poder coordinarnos
Saludos
adrianmg13 (2025-06-21 19:43:09+00:00): Buenas tardes, la delimitación la he hecho mirando el catastro oficial, seleccionando parcela por parcela, he obtenido cada partida, he tardado un día entero, y además tengo algún contacto en el Ayuntamiento de Muchamiel que me ha ayudado, además de que vivo en una de esas partidas.
Jordi MF (2025-06-20 10:53:01+00:00): En este changeset se ha eliminado un núcleo de población válido y se ha modificado la tipología de poblaciones sin seguir las Directrices de etiquetado españolas de OSM.

Revierto este changeset y el siguiente: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167848900
Jordi MF (2025-06-20 10:50:23+00:00): Hola,

adrianmg13, ¿por qué eliminas nodos sobre barrios que existen, como Ciutat d'Assís (https://visor.gva.es/visor/?extension=716685,4246961,718107,4247619&nivelZoom=17&capasids=Imagen;,0103_NTV;&tcapas=1.0,1.0)?

Nunca comentas los changesets que se te dejan. Por favor, responde a los siguientes comentarios: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=21808597
eggie (2025-06-20 07:01:12+00:00): Beste Wemble... Waarom alles dubbeltaggen.
Het lijkt me beter een keuze te maken tussen het vlak en een node.

MVG
eggie
Wemble2 (2025-06-20 08:38:40+00:00): Beste Eggie,

Bedankt voor je feedback. Helemaal eens om een keuze te maken tussen vlak en node. Om de een of andere reden stonden er 5 wind turbines als vlak gemarkeerd en niet langer als node, terwijl alle andere wind turbines (bij dit park maar ook bij alle andere parken in het hele land) als nodes staan aangemerkt, en het vlak staat dan als gebouw gemarkeerd, niet als wind turbine.
Daarom heb ik deze 5 turbines nu weer als nodes aangepast, en ik heb de vlakken nu ook veranderd in gebouw, in plaats van wind turbine, dus als het goed is staat er nu niks meer dubbel.

Groeten, Wemble
eggie (2025-06-20 08:42:54+00:00): Oke Top!

Mapse,
eggie
Minh Nguyen (2025-07-04 06:45:09+00:00): Hi, your addition of a ref tag to the Peña Boulevard route relation is apparently causing some renderers to think this route is numbered “Peña” despite already belonging to a route network all its own. You also cited an image on Wikimedia Commons that might be misleading people to think it’s a route shield:

https://github.com/osm-americana/openstreetmap-americana/pull/1214#issuecomment-3034717224
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-07-04 16:34:10+00:00): Okay, I will fix these.
b-jazz (2025-06-20 05:04:10+00:00): Hello again Tom,

You also don't want to do this thing where you break down a feature into parts like you do with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1396718878. You'll want to draw the rough as a single polygon and the two bunkers inside and then combine them by selecting all objects and right clicking one of them and selecting "Merge" (I think that's what iD calls it). This will create a proper "multipolygon" with the inner/outer features labelled correctly. Let me know if you have any question and I'll gladly help clarify things. thanks.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-20 06:06:34+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18366
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-23 06:15:15+00:00): DWG revert - deleted apparent existing features

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167985369
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-06-20 03:11:48+00:00): 你好，hahae，我注意到你删除了两个路口的名称，请问当地是否有对这两个路口如此的称呼？如果是这种称呼或者用法存在的话，其实不应该删除的。
hahae (2025-06-20 07:01:49+00:00): 当时我也是实验添加的。这两个路口名只存在于路牌上，没有人会用，甚至路牌上的名称都不统一。比如说下面那个路口，一个路牌叫秋实街口，一个叫秋实路口，根本无法确定，所以就删除了
jumbanho (2025-07-09 18:05:33+00:00): Thanks for adding the construction information here.  I've undone the closed bridge section part of 94 since i-94 is open eastbound, even if it is on the other span.
libremn (2025-07-10 01:34:39+00:00): Thank you!
tntchn (2025-06-20 03:51:04+00:00): 前一陣子入口工程完工，但因為沒有空照圖，所以先用大概的路徑把行走路徑連起來，並修正了一些近期更新的圖徵
jeslop (2025-06-20 14:22:03+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167873290
jeslop (2025-06-20 14:20:54+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167873252
aharvey (2025-06-20 05:43:13+00:00): The ways which join the road to the parking lots (eg. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1396730532) should be "Driveway" (highway=service + service=driveway) not "Unclassified" (highway=unclassified). As a rule of thumb if you drive up and over the footpath it's a driveway. For example this is unclassified https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151689579
aharvey (2025-06-20 05:45:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1396730553

I'm not sure about that one the routing will already let you turn there like this https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=-27.558516%2C152.278678%3B-27.558694%2C152.278799

usually we wouldn't model the intersection like that unless there is a large traffic island in the middle of the intersection.
aharvey (2025-06-20 05:47:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1396730552 turn lanes are not modelled like that, we only draw a separate way where there is physical separation, if there's just paint on the ground it's best to use the turn:lanes tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn#Indicated_turns_by_lane to specify the turn lanes.

The existing way at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40427397 already allows for routing from Spencer Street turning right into Gatton Showgrounds.
Lexi A (2025-06-22 01:45:21+00:00): Thanks aharvey for the corrections and explainations and taking the time to review my edits. I will keep these in mind for the future and hopefully map more accurately in the future
tntchn (2025-06-20 04:14:14+00:00): 臨時起意，「勝後」這個名字從我大學的時候就一直被叫到現在。市民比較少使用這個名字，但是成大的學生對這個名字應該很熟悉，例如「勝後木桌」、「到勝後吃宵（夜）」等。

勝後也不是一個真正的地方，他代表的意思應該是勝八舍側門出去後面的區域，所以無法定義他的範圍，抽象的說是從勝利側門到東寧長榮路口週邊的區域，所以我把地點放在勝利側門旁邊，就是平常大家口說「約勝後」可能會見面的地方，讓這個地名成為一個實體。
Supaplex (2025-06-20 05:28:01+00:00): 可以加上來源是在地知識或是有當地學生刊物有記載？
tntchn (2025-06-20 08:11:40+00:00): 我直接打在討論串好了不然 source 有長度限制

https://manage-oga.ncku.edu.tw/p/406-1189-236260,r11.php?Lang=zh-tw
https://www.dcard.tw/f/ncku/p/256522942
https://www.instagram.com/p/DKZbeh5SViR/
https://www.facebook.com/profile/100057415511048/search/?q=%E5%8B%9D%E5%BE%8C
Flounder71 (2025-06-20 04:15:10+00:00): new to this. use his data maps at work that cost money.
Glassman (2025-06-24 11:17:34+00:00): 58th does look like a private road, unless it is marked with no trespassings signs, the tag motor_vehicle = private should not be used. Instead I would suggest the tag ownership=private. Can you review this edit? Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167851746
ralley (2025-06-20 05:15:11+00:00): Source was "survey;Mapillary"
AndreaDp271 (2025-06-20 09:47:49+00:00): perché hai rimosso le corsie?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167853212
nosec (2025-06-20 19:03:44+00:00): > perché hai rimosso le corsie? 

OpenStreetMap adotta uno schema di mappatura secondo cui le corsie vengono rappresentate o mappate come due linee parallele solo nei punti in cui è presente una separazione fisica strutturale, come un cordolo.

(tradotto automaticamente)
pitfire (2025-06-20 08:51:43+00:00): Hallo DrDee 

Du hast gerade einen Zufahrtsweg asphaltiert, der in einem
Gebäude endet, dass es laut Luftbild gar nicht geben sollte.
Kannst Du die Örtlichkeit nochmals genauer eruieren und auf
den Istzustand überprüfen. Deine Anpassung „surface=asphalt“
hattest Du bestimmt Vor Ort ermittelt?

VG pitfire
pitfire (2025-06-20 09:38:06+00:00): Habs angepasst.
VG pitfire
DeFra85 (2025-07-07 16:48:13+00:00): Ahoi, was für ein Wegweiser steht denn hier genau?
Kurtii (2025-07-08 12:48:39+00:00): Hier steht ein Wegweiser für die beiden Wanderrouten Hüggelrundweg und Erzsteig
DeFra85 (2025-07-08 13:11:11+00:00): Sieht der so aus
1) https://www.geopark-terravita.de/page/uploads/images/events/wegweiser.jpg
oder so
2) https://www.geopark-terravita.de/page/gallery/1450698044/7_1450698044.jpg
?
Kurtii (2025-07-08 13:33:52+00:00): Wie Punkt 2 mit zusätzlich 2 Pfeilen an der Seite um die Richtung der Wege anzuzeigen
DeFra85 (2025-07-08 13:40:17+00:00): Okay.
Auch wenn diese Pfeile in verschiedene Richtungen gehen sollten, ist das kein Wander-Wegweiser, sondern lediglich eine Wegemarkierung. Weitere Erklärungen dazu gibt's im Wiki.
Der Pfosten ist wahrscheinlich nur da, weil es keinen Baum in der Nähe gibt für die Markierung... und weil TERRA.vita gerne Altplastik aufstellt.
Kurtii (2025-07-08 14:21:55+00:00): Habe den Objekttyp dementsprechend angepasst
DeFra85 (2025-07-08 14:33:13+00:00): 👍
Und nicht vergessen für welche Aktivität die Wegemarkierung ist: hiking=yes
IndiaKW2Gf7rTBt5C (2025-06-20 08:22:59+00:00): Please complete your work, as your upload is merely nodes, no building outlines appeared, may be an incomplete upload, please mind there are a rate limiting now, please wait the entire upload process until complete before you close the JOSM, perform other tasks or leave, and confirm all of your works were uploaded successfully.

Thank you.
rempshaener (2025-06-20 17:44:59+00:00): Hallo,
wenn es sich um reinen Fußweg handelt, passt
bicycle=no
foot=designated
highway=path
segregated=no
traffic_sign=DE:240

nicht so richtig.

Eine entsprechende Beschilderung vorausgesetzt wäre das obige zu ersetzen durch

foot=designated
highway=footway
traffic_sign=DE:239

Eine große Hilfe sind dabei Tools wie dieses hier: https://trafficsigns.osm-verkehrswende.org/DE

Bei Fragen bitte melden.

Viele Grüße
addr: (2025-06-20 06:24:48+00:00): sorry
dpolovinkin (2025-06-20 14:39:50+00:00): you added strange informal path on the square and have 7 warnings about that, you sure about that?
dpolovinkin (2025-06-20 14:40:52+00:00): more so, it goes straight though the monument, can you explain? :)
micheleOSM3 (2025-06-20 23:31:26+00:00): It seems to me that the way already existed before and that hasahi just added these tags:
highway=path
informal=yes
dpolovinkin (2025-06-21 08:38:05+00:00): dunno, at least when I look at Organic Maps app there is no such path here, just a square with other paths which are there already

I suppose there was once a way here, deleted 4 years ago and now added again, the history is mostly about two nodes of this way

I can hardly see a reason to add this, there are paths on this square already, and it's already a pedestrian area. For what, so map navigation will draw a diagonal way instead of slightly squarish? also not cool that user added this while ignoring a lot of warnings
micheleOSM3 (2025-06-21 09:19:25+00:00): For me the way should be deleted and the only relation that passes on the way should be moved to the orthogonal ways (highway=pedestrian)

I guess hasahi just tried to improve what was there..
dpolovinkin (2025-06-21 10:08:10+00:00): yeah, makes sense. just did that, cna check, should be good now
bernward1 (2025-07-02 18:50:39+00:00): Dieser Änderungssatz hat Lücken in der Buslinie 672 erzeugt.
Der Fehler war, dass die Straße in Fleckertshöhe nicht in der richtige Abfolge eingetragen war.
kasa kai (2025-07-31 18:55:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted and merged with correct information (where possible) under https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169775802 as it does not follow the naming convention in India documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India#Naming_in_different_scripts_and_languages
evgenykatyshev (2025-06-20 13:03:12+00:00): I reverted this changeset because of wrong street renaming

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167869884
kasa kai (2025-07-31 20:13:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted and merged with correct information (where possible) under https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169788972 as it does not follow the naming convention in India documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India#Naming_in_different_scripts_and_languages
eggie (2025-06-20 08:44:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
kasa kai (2025-08-01 14:42:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted and merged with correct information (where possible) under https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169821988 as it does not follow the naming convention in India documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India#Naming_in_different_scripts_and_languages
Galbinus (2025-06-28 09:08:10+00:00): Hallo Flohoff, welche Quelle hast Du verwendet um die Adressen Kampstraße 5, 7, 9 und 15 einzutragen? Wieso genau diese und nicht 3 und 11 und woran machst Du die Position der Adressen fest?
flohoff (2025-06-28 15:18:23+00:00): Open Data des Landes NRW - das Autoprozessiere ich als Diff gegen OSM so das ich neue Addressen finde. Normalerweise sind die dann auch schon im ALKIS Sichtbar. Das ist nicht IMMER der fall - aber meistens.

Oft sind die dann auch nur einem Grundstück zugeordnet und keinem Gebäude - dann lege ich die in den Grundstücksoutline - so das der Bauunternehmer wenigstens das Grundstück findet. Muss dann nach Bau entsprechend auf das Outline verschoben werden.
flohoff (2025-06-28 15:35:30+00:00): Also - die 9 ist in meinen Datenbeständen neu aufgetaucht:

{
  "lat": "51.87482",
  "lon": "8.94954",
  "strasse": "Kampstraße",
  "hausnummer": "9"
}

Die 5, 7, 9, 11 sind alle im ALKIS Sichtbar

Hier screenshots aus dem JOSM mit DOP und ALKIS overlayed:

https://tmp.zz.de/20250628-YodelCanopy/
Galbinus (2025-06-28 15:52:58+00:00): Danke für die Info. Merkwürdigerweise hat der Action dort im Internet die Hausnummer 15 angibt, der Rossmann die Hausnummer 5. Aldi hat noch gar nichts angegeben. Da ich da um die Ecke wohne, behalte ich das im Auge.
GrabSG_AndyAng (2026-02-23 07:58:27+00:00): Hi kenken234,
There seems to be an undefined line in your changeset. 
Way: w1396775172

Could you check if this can be removed?
FajrAl (2026-02-28 12:49:21+00:00): IIRC, this was used as GRC boundary. Since there's no relation attached to the way and there exist an updated one relation/11033362; I think it's safe to remove it.
dcapillae (2025-06-20 08:06:49+00:00): Buenos días.

Los nombres en OSM deben escribirse con la letra inicial de las palabras principales en mayúscula. Más información en el wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Capitalisation

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
dcapillae (2025-06-20 08:02:14+00:00): Buenos días.

Este conjunto de cambios fue revertido.

Las preguntas sobre contenedores de reciclaje in StreetComplete no funcionan bien. Hay una conversación en Github para corregirlo:
https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/discussions/6025

Cada contenedor de reciclaje se destina a un tipo de residuo diferente, no se deben mezclar. Se mapean como un nodo independiente para no mezclar tipos de residuos diferentes en un mismo contenedor: un contenedor --> un nodo.

Hay que asegurarse de que no haya ya un contenedor en el mapa para el tipo de residuo que deseamos añadir. Normalmente suelen estar cerca unos de otros.

Contenedor azul (papel y cartón):
recycling:paper=yes
recycling:magazines=yes
recycling:cardboard=yes
recycling:newspaper=yes
recycling:paper_packaging=yes

Contenedor amarillo (latas, envases y botellas de plástico):
recycling:plastic_packaging=yes
recycling:plastic_bottles=yes
recycling:cans=yes

Contenedor verde (botellas de cristal):
recycling:glass_bottles=yes

Contenedor marrón (restos orgánicos)
Respecto a los contenedores marrones (residuos orgánicos), dado que aceptan tanto restos de comida como restos vegetales (flores u hojarasca) sería conveniente etiquetarlos como «recycling:organic=yes». osm.org/user/dcapillae/diary/400818

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
kasa kai (2025-08-02 18:44:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted and merged with correct information (where possible) under https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169876141 as it does not follow the naming convention in India documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India#Naming_in_different_scripts_and_languages
Comino (2025-06-20 07:26:25+00:00): Hi xpertfoundationrepair,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#legacy-tags
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin
greatcarrr (2025-06-23 12:39:16+00:00): Great Carmania is your mechanic of choice for the area of Williams, AZ.
https://www.greatcarmania.com/lemars
berndw (2025-06-20 07:21:09+00:00): Dann mache ich den Hinweis zu ;-)
AndreaDp271 (2025-06-20 09:55:32+00:00): "crossing:light" should only be used for level crossings, see wiki:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:light
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167856111
AndreaDp271 (2025-06-20 09:58:13+00:00): In addition, "flashing_lights = button" not "button_operated = light" should be used
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167856111
nosec (2025-06-20 19:15:23+00:00): Grazie mille!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:flashing lights
In effetti, è davvero molto più adatto :-)
nosec (2025-06-20 19:16:19+00:00): * https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:flashing_lights
kasa kai (2025-08-06 09:24:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted and merged with correct information (where possible) under https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170046297 as it does not follow the naming convention in India documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India#Naming_in_different_scripts_and_languages