piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2025-05-01 10:17:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Pleae have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1382561658. What is the mean of the tags
    CC_3 = NA
    COUNTRY = Lebanon
    ENGTYPE_3 = Municipality
    FID = 1028
    GID_0 = LBN
    GID_1 = LBN.6_1
    GID_2 = LBN.6.4_1
    GID_3 = LBN.6.4.7_1
    HASC_3 = NA
    NAME_1 = Nabatiyeh
    NAME_2 = Nabatiyeh
    NAME_3 = Arab Salim
    NL_NAME_1 = NA
    NL_NAME_2 = NA
    NL_NAME_3 = NA
    TYPE_3 = Municipality
    VARNAME_3 = Aarab Salim
?
Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative
pktiuk (2025-04-30 12:48:04+00:00): Wydaje mi się, Zakład Usług Komunalnych nie powinien być zrobiony jako teren lecz jako punkt (ale mogę się mylić)
eggie (2025-04-30 17:54:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
mavl (2025-05-18 05:33:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166416092 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, wrong data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17683].
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-30 13:01:11+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Nowa Obra":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078215859
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078215860
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078215861

"Biały Dwór":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078215862

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-30 13:01:09+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993449079
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078194713

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
chris66 (2025-05-02 06:24:25+00:00): Wow, schneller als die Feuerwehr.... :-)

VG Chris
rempshaener (2025-04-30 18:22:29+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.

Zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338847841:
Belegt der Club wirklich das gesamte Gebäude? Sofern nicht, wäre es besser, die Information nur an einem Node zu erfassen. Hat der Club einen Namen? Dann bitte ergänzen.

Zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338847849:
Auch hier die Frage, ob die Tagespflege wirklich das gesamte Gebäude belegt, dann wäre aber wahrscheinlich building=apartments falsch; passender wäre mutmaßlich building=detached. Und auch hier im Bedarfsfall lieber auf einen Node ziehen. Ein Name („Krabbelkoje“) wäre auch gut.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
rskedgell (2025-05-01 05:29:06+00:00): (Review requested)

If you wanted to add the log itself, you could add a node (point) where it is on the track with the tags barrier=log + check_date=2025-04-30 (or whatever date you visited). The links below might be useful.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dlog
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:check_date
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:obstacle#Fallen_tree
rskedgell (2025-05-01 05:30:53+00:00): (Sorry, I see you've already done that! I must wait until the coffee has rebooted my brain before looking at OSM.)
Andyp4777 (2025-05-01 14:37:10+00:00): Thanks :) I just wanted to check I hadn't messed it up.
eggie (2025-04-30 17:56:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
user_5359 (2025-05-02 09:55:08+00:00): Hello! What is the mean of the tag ۶۶ = Bank sepah?
felipeeugenio (2025-05-02 15:39:43+00:00): Hola. Según el SII y la cartelería verificable en terreno la calle se llama Capuchinos.
Es cierto que en otras partes de Santiago hay calles llamadas Capuchinas, pero por lo menos todo lo oficial que manejamos indica que llama Capuchinos. Incluyendo los carteles de la calle. Tiene algún link al catastro de la municipalidad?
saludos
Vicente Moraga (2025-05-02 16:03:34+00:00): Hola, el catastro oficial se encuentra en http://catastro.munistgo.cl/predial/ donde figura el pasaje como Capuchinas.
Saludos.
felipeeugenio (2025-05-04 00:33:56+00:00): Gracias Vicente. 
Pensamos que se trata de un error en el catastro. Esta calle además es muy famosa porque así estaba el anexo cárcel capuchinos. 
Lo dejaremos como nombre alternativo. 
Saludos
silversurfer83 (2025-05-01 19:09:09+00:00): Hi :)

besser als "Kump".
Gibt's da eigentlich ein Schild? Dann "name" und wenn nicht, dann "loc_name" und in jedem Fall "Kump" entfernen

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165636102
random tree (2025-05-03 18:19:25+00:00): Hallo, 
ja, es gibt ein Schild. Ein Photo davon findet sich aud der Webseite der Geschichteswerkstatt der ALS:
https://www.geschichtswerkstatt-als.de/de/infotafel.html
Das Schild ist an der Hauswand neben dem Haus angebracht. 

Gruß random tree
silversurfer83 (2025-05-03 18:35:05+00:00): Dachte ich mir schon, dass da was hängt. Hatte es nur nicht im Kopf.

Dann umbenennen.
NumisK (2025-06-16 12:50:00+00:00): Hello ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy, Thank you for mapping!
While working on Canada - Add roundabout tag you added superfluous oneway tag. I removed that from all of your edits. Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-06-16 12:53:12+00:00): These were added for a resaon: some old routing engines still do not map them as oneway, so for backward compatibility, we still add the oneway tag. Can you cancel the removal please?
NumisK (2025-06-17 11:51:16+00:00): Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
ilias_ (2025-04-30 18:05:42+00:00): Merci et bienvenue! Pas besoin d'ajouter "Station d'essence" en tant que nom puisque ceci est déjà convié par les autres tags.
狄惠貴 (2025-07-09 01:39:21+00:00): 您好：
健行路線關聯於魯地圖上屬於“建議路線”性質，可以從風格樣式中選擇開啟或關閉，並不會改變路徑的實質名稱。
許多縱走路線因為山徑的彼此連接中間會經過一些公路，又諸多登山路線因某些因素必須行走一段產業道路才能到達山徑登山口(搭公車、停車問題)，所以在建立路線關聯時會將這些原因考慮在內。
stanchen_osm (2025-07-23 09:55:04+00:00): 您好, 抱歉晚回應.

我是之前在Windows Garmin BaseCamp上的魯地圖看到石牛山產業道路被命名為"高石縱走"的, 手機版本是否也是這樣顯示我並沒有看.

當初更改的想法是, 這段產業道路是一般只爬石牛山的人也要走的一段, 在這段產業道路上被命名(或標示)成高石縱走實在很怪, 所以把它移除, 當然我也覺得少了這一段, 實務上對登山者不會構成困擾.

當然您的想法也沒錯, 一段縱走路線的"Relation"可包含從停車點開始的產業道路.

這也許是在產生魯地圖的軟體會把OSM未被命名的道路但有設定為某路線Relation者, 以Relation的路線名稱來標示, 也或許有其它原因,.

我不堅持我的想法, 若您覺得要改回原本的樣子, 您可以再改回, 或是您是魯地圖團隊成員, 或可與開發者討論是否有更好的方法也可.
silversurfer83 (2025-05-01 19:02:12+00:00): Hi

da steht aber noch VZ250 am way

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165637525
flohoff (2025-05-07 16:03:05+00:00): Das war der note weshalb ich das verändert hatte - 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4735275

Kannst du ja nochmal auf machen und neu diskutieren.

Flo
silversurfer83 (2025-05-07 18:12:48+00:00): Zur note:
Klingt wie der gleiche Typ, der auch bei mir in der Gegend hin und wieder total abgeht mit seinen "Hinweisen". Herzallerliebst.

Zur Änderung: Am Weg ist traffic sign DE:250 getaggt. Das passt nicht zu deinen access Werten und hat erstmal nichts mit der note zu tun

Grüße
silversurfer83
flohoff (2025-05-08 15:56:04+00:00): Vorher war ein access=no drauf - und das ist natürlich definitiv falsch. Wenn da ein Z250 steht dann eben ein vehicle=no und gut.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-26 08:16:51+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173782932
reified (2025-04-30 18:08:22+00:00): Thank you very much for working on Kazakhstan, we need all the help we can get!

Just in case you're not aware, Bing has not updated raster tiles for our rural regions for more than a decade, they're often completely out of date.

The most recent tiles are provided by Esri, although they're not as clear and have to be combined with Mapbox (which is older than Esri, but still not as old as Bing).

Cheers.
Russ (2025-05-01 09:43:05+00:00): Thanks! Yes, I am also checking the Esri imagery but Bing has slightly better resolution in most cases so I'm still mostly using that.

We're working on the Oh my Grid project to map power networks if you're interested: https://ohmygrid.org/
eggie (2025-04-30 20:32:11+00:00): Hoi  Je vraagt feedback  .. Wellicht klopt smoothness=intermediate ook niet meer?

MVG
eggie
rene78 (2025-05-01 10:39:32+00:00): Hi Seewäldler,

ich hab mal den "Technisch-historischer Rundweg" als Relation angelegt.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19065848

Viele Grüsse
Rene
seewäldler (2025-05-01 17:02:14+00:00): Hallo rene78

Hättest du 'ne Idee, wie z.B. die Tafel https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12801885586 zugeordnet werden könnte, die beim Häfler Geschichtspfad die Nummer 5.28 (das ist wohl die ältere) und beim Fischbacher Technischen Weg die Nummer 22 (das ist ein neueres kleines Schild unten dran) hat? Sowohl das network zwei mal aufführen, und zwei Relationen dazu?
rene78 (2025-05-02 22:46:19+00:00): Hmmm, gute Frage 🤔
Wenn es 2 separate Schilder sind wären vielleicht 2 Knoten in OSM angebracht? Dann hätte sich das Problem mit den unterschiedlichen Nummern auch erledigt.

Wenn der Informationstext auf der Tafel jedoch für beide Pfade identisch ist wüsste ich nicht, wie man 2 Nummern bzw. Namen für einen Knoten vergibt. Vielleicht "name=22. Station Mühle Dehm", "alt_name=Geschichtspfad Friedrichshafen Nr. 5.28"?
seewäldler (2025-05-03 10:07:16+00:00): Das ist wohl eine sehr historisch gewachsene Auswahl an Schildern quer durch die ganze Stadt, da ist alles mögliche mit dabei: 

https://www.pic-upload.de/view-37493166/50611.jpg.html
https://www.pic-upload.de/view-37493167/50641.jpg.html
https://www.pic-upload.de/view-37493168/50881.jpg.html
https://www.pic-upload.de/view-37493169/51031.jpg.html

Jetzt schau ich erst mal, dass ich alle finde.
VictorIE (2025-05-01 19:43:35+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/658906368

Osmose is whining that the entrances on this building are making it overlap with two other buildings. Having the entrances as part of both buildings should sort the issue.
b-unicycling (2025-05-02 16:04:02+00:00): Alright, EveryDoor wasn't able to do that, but should be fixed now.
VictorIE (2025-05-02 21:20:12+00:00): :)
jcarlson (2025-05-02 00:20:38+00:00): watch your changeset comments, this wasn't a minooka edit
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165638963
LuRe84 (2025-04-30 14:59:22+00:00): Nei prossimi giorni verrà completato il sopralluogo per la mappatura  dell’intero percorso.
ivanbranco (2025-04-30 15:09:46+00:00): Ciao, l'aggiunta del nome a questa way é un errore dovuto alla fusione dei due segmenti? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1342832980

Perché vorrebbe dire che ha lo stesso nome del sentiero perpendicolare a sud. Inoltre all'inizio nord di questo sentiero c'é un segnavia che indica 5 minuti per Canale di Gronda.
LuRe84 (2025-04-30 15:19:55+00:00): Si tratta di un errore di fusione che avevo già iniziato a correggere prima del tuo messaggio.

Per quanto riguarda le destinazioni, al momento le ho rimosse, poiché sospetto ci siano errori reali nella segnaletica. 

Conto di verificarli nei prossimi giorni.
Justin1234 (2025-05-06 15:31:00+00:00): Hello, welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Make sure to expand "Ct" to "Court" in the street names (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations ) and also connect the streets together
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165639568
MassCartog (2025-04-30 15:57:39+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. in this change set you removed what seem to be valid features, please don't remove features that exist on the ground. The features you removed were restored and tagged as a access=private and driveway. This will now prevent apps from routing people though these ways.

But better solution to vehicles accessing private areas is to make it clear on the ground by using signs and barricades.

Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
MassCartog (2025-04-30 16:09:56+00:00): I chatted with this user in DMs, asked that we continued the discussion here. Changed the way to track based on their feedback.
woodpeck_repair (2025-05-07 20:19:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165956212 where the changeset comment is: revert removal of private paths. the tagging access=private is appropriate and correct.
ivanbranco (2025-05-06 11:23:48+00:00): What's the source of this edit?
Comino (2025-05-06 15:40:14+00:00): What a friendly way of asking :-(

You probably missed the news: https://njump.me/nevent1qqsy6ukwtkk4y78nzujgnefn408gpwetm6n9qlpy0jnqy8gs09xxfagpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgq3qv9rlzxtd93yaqr3kkdc4axuaaca2wka78n6l5fja6yydd83r9ths76pu4q

Edwin Comino
IT entrepreneur and Bitcoin enthusiast
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
ivanbranco (2025-05-06 16:41:41+00:00): Asking for a source is normal in OSM, especially for remote edits. It’s not meant to be unfriendly; it helps ensure data quality.

Next time, please include the source URL directly in the source=* field of the changeset, at least while editing in Italy. Also, please do not convert ways to nodes just to please btcmap.
Comino (2025-05-06 17:02:06+00:00): No problem in asking, it’s the way you asked that triggered me.

Instead of “What's the source of this edit?” you could have asked “Could you please share where this edit came from? Thanks a bunch!”
Pieter Hilkemeijer (2025-05-03 14:13:47+00:00): I believe you removed just a bit to much. Only the path towards the open valley should have been removed. The path around het 'Valleihuisje', is still there. The same for the path that feels like you are going through a tunnel ;-)
ligfietser (2025-05-03 14:19:30+00:00): Ik ben er net geweest, ze hebben het pad om het huisje verwijderd, met takken versperd en toen ik even over die haag heen ben gestapt om te kijken of dat pad nog ergens liep kwam er gelijk een boswachter op me af. Kreeg nog net geen boete van 125 euro. 🤔
Pieter Hilkemeijer (2025-05-03 14:24:50+00:00): Ben er ook net geweest. ;-)
Het pad vanuit het huisje naar west langs het 'vallei'. Dat pad is inderdaad weg. Die had ik een paar weken eerder al van de kaart gehaald. 
Je kan gewoon om het huisje heen lopen. Het enige wat ik niet meer zeker wist (en van daag checkte), was het pad van noord naar zuid.  (lees van de kapschuur) naar het dal. Die is inderdaad gedeeltelijk weg. Die is versperd en al redelijk dichtgegroeid.
ligfietser (2025-05-03 17:05:47+00:00): Pas het dan maar aan wat ik teveel heb weggehaald 😊
Pieter Hilkemeijer (2025-05-04 09:14:16+00:00): Ik heb de changeset teruggedraaid en het pad wat naar mijn ziens inderdaad weg is, verwijderd. Ik denk dat het zo een correcte weergave van de huidige stand is.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-05-02 19:42:15+00:00): This changeset removed the highway tags.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165640259
eggie (2025-04-30 18:00:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
baprischka (2025-11-15 21:06:11+00:00): Why construction:aerialway instead of disused:aerialway? They won’t build a new one before years to come.
WBSKI (2025-11-15 22:54:27+00:00): Hi! I thought they would make repairs to the cable car rather soon. I agree it should be changed if it’s not the case.
mueschel (2025-05-04 10:35:00+00:00): Hi,
you introduced a new tag here: "bikestreets" - what does it mean?
atticquilt (2025-05-04 13:26:46+00:00): This was an error. Good catch. I've resolved it now.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-07-23 02:58:55+00:00): Why was the bridge connected to the motorway it crosses?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-01 01:57:35+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167033282
MxxCon (2025-05-02 15:57:33+00:00): Hello.
Please note that "beige" is not a valid color name.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:colour#Colour_names. It's much better to use proper hex color values.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165641614
Kartibu (2025-05-03 10:51:16+00:00): Hello, 
Thank you for your feedback. I just selected the color in the editor "Street Complete expert edition" version 60.3 ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/SCEE ). I trusted this editor. I have not checked your indication that this color is invalid now. It could be that it is an issue with the "Street Complete expert edition" editor. You are free to delete the color again or change it to a hex value or report the issue to the Street Complete expert edition project. I am only a user of this editor.
woodpeck (2025-05-07 20:32:21+00:00): The driveway connecting 111th and 107th has been removed again by the owner, and a complaint lodged with DWG as Ticket #2025050710000421. I reverted the deletion and explained to them that access=private is sufficient to deter trespassers.
pippo6 (2025-04-30 18:04:21+00:00): sì ma è sparita la traversa a sinistra :-) la rimetto come una linea separata

In casi come questo fai prima con lo strumento Taglia: selezioni la strada, premi Shift, selezioni il nodo, fai clic destro sul nodo, clicca sulle forbici
yeagvr11 (2025-04-30 18:08:27+00:00): non ci avevo pensato… grazie per il consiglio :D
Allison P (2025-05-01 07:09:06+00:00): Hello Sorem,

Thank you for adding your business to OpenStreetMap. There are a few issues with your edit:

-The name should not be all caps.
-The description is not to be used for ad copy.
-Images should be of the feature only, not company logos.

You added a unit number to the feature 3707. I see it on your website too. However, each office in the building has a different address number, and I know that no suite numbers are in use at this location. Can you explain? I notice the person adding the listing for the previous tenant used a different, non-existent suite number (1515).

The actual address is in Garden City, not Boise.

This is less an issue and more an improvement. There is an existing node for the 9169 address. The map currently has a law office at this address. Visiting their website revealed the location is no longer listed. I have replaced the listing with yours.

I fixed all issues listed. Please let me know if you have any other questions.

Allison P
Sorem (2025-05-01 23:57:34+00:00): Hi Allison.
First of all, I'd like to thank you for reviewing the node I added. I appreciate the fixes you made and apologize for them.

Second, I'd like to clear up the mystery of the suite number.

For the purposes of our business, we use a service from physicaladdress.com, which guarantees that we a/ have an official company address b/ receive mail and other stuff there. We also use this for all legal inquiries and as our official company headquarters.  I can also prove it with the contract if needed. You know, we're the IT consultants and we often work from different places or locations.

So when we set up our company, there was an option to choose a suite number and we chose 3707, which is the last 4 digits of our phone number :)

Thanks again and have a nice weekend!

Marek
Allison P (2025-05-02 02:07:18+00:00): Understood. OSM is not a business directory. It only maps physical features. Your business is not suitable for inclusion unless it has a physical office where customers may visit. As the only physical presence here is the mailbox rental service, only it is suitable for inclusion.
Sorem (2025-06-06 14:29:24+00:00): ok, thanks for letting me know.,
Lambig (2025-04-30 16:56:55+00:00): source=Ortho IGN HR (and not survey)
Walter Mayeku (2025-05-30 21:43:27+00:00): Hello Raquel
Thank you for contributing to this project so far. 
I am reaching out concerning the accuracy of the edits on this changeset. Kindly make sure to map buildings as they appear on the image, also square them by pressing Q on the keyboard if the building appears rectangular/squared.
jacobwhall (2025-07-25 03:31:00+00:00): Hey Gavin! I'm wondering what the "Sport Outpost" nodes are that you mapped in this changeset. Maybe we could find some more descriptive tags for them. Thanks!
maro21 (2025-04-30 19:29:13+00:00): Podjazd pod budynek jako secondary? To chyba żart.
pavvv (2025-04-30 19:49:17+00:00): Ej no, pod sam budynek jest service ;)
Chyba zmiana kategorii do wycofania patrząc po forum, ale reszta niech zostanie.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-01 01:57:17+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167033278
txemt (2025-05-02 03:05:35+00:00): I have a question. I've noticed that back in 2022, you labeled some section of I-10 as "Interstate 10 South" through parts of Beaumont. Is there a particular reason why you were labeling them as such? 

Nowhere along the 2460 miles of that stretch of interstate is I-10 labeled or signed as "south." I haven't looked into Houston or other parts of the state, yet (as much as I edit in Texas, I would have found this a lot sooner). Idk if you were marking this as it goes south for maybe 15 miles, or if this was an oversight, or something else. 

I've since fixed it to simply say "I-10" but my curiosity has been peaked pretty hard as to why it was labeled as such.
MarkoŠatrak (2025-05-02 05:58:24+00:00): Hi @txemt,

I’m the lead for our organised OSM editing activity and wanted to respond to your question.

Our team only started editing in late 2024, so the edits you’re referring to from 2022 were made by someone else. For example, the changes on I-10 appear to be from this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154799830
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27794735/history/23
You may want to contact that mapper directly.

Let me know if I can help with anything related to our recent edits.
txemt (2025-05-02 11:57:43+00:00): After I sent this, I realize it was going to the wrong person. Please disregard!
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-30 17:10:55+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1382612592

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-30 04:53:18+00:00): DWG revert - apparent undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166951671
CurlingMan13 (2025-06-26 05:55:21+00:00): Benches should not be named "Bench".

A name is only a name, and not a description.  Names removed
tjhorner (2025-05-06 15:48:41+00:00): I really appreciate how Sound Transit is always quick to make edits for important accessibility features at new stations. Thank you!
Aethonatic (2025-04-30 17:54:10+00:00): A couple of addresses added to houses in Germany... then a pond all the way in Canada? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
OPerivar (2025-04-30 19:12:57+00:00): You're right, that was a clear mistake. 
Happens to the best of us, right?