piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nevw (2023-08-23 12:17:44+00:00): Hi, you appear to have deleted a large building se of the junction of Sandwych and Adams Streets. This building is still visible on satellite imagery.
Glassman (2023-08-29 19:42:02+00:00): I merged the two buildings -from other imagery they look like they are connected. If not just let me know and I'm happy to fix. Also removed name=q. Looks like a typo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140253568
DJSomers (2023-08-29 19:53:57+00:00): Two buildings are connected by deck. All part of the home. Thank you.
Friendly_Ghost (2023-08-24 16:15:11+00:00): Hi Ecoutez,

Thank you for putting this place on the map. The way you mapped it looks good overall. I do have some feedback, if you don't mind:

Based on the healthcare:speciality tag that you added, I think you can also add the tag shop=hearing_aids (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dhearing_aids).

The description you added is subjective and has the character of marketing language, which is something we would rather not have on the map. 

The opening hours should follow a machine-readable syntax so OSM-based apps can use it. Documentation for that is here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

Let me know if you have any questions, and feel free to reach out to any of the contact channels of the OSM community: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels

Happy mapping!
njwj00 (2023-08-23 04:02:54+00:00): Ramen?
njwj00 (2023-08-23 04:03:39+00:00): Yumz
DonRoPL (2023-10-04 11:22:20+00:00): what does fire_hydrant:coupling_type=1 exactly mean?
user_5359 (2023-08-23 16:18:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/11137577321. Please have a look on the notation of a fire hydrant ( see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag%3Aemergency%3Dfire_hydrant). Please notice also the british color (instead color). the key type is reserved for a relation description.
jtracey (2023-08-23 04:29:28+00:00): resolves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3846781
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-23 12:34:17+00:00): Thanks for a quick fix!
user_5359 (2023-08-23 16:03:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys).
Mashin (2023-08-23 06:52:57+00:00): Thanks for fixing all the parking lots Andrew!
mavOsaure (2023-08-23 11:12:35+00:00): Bonjour,

Tu as l'air d'un nouveau contributeur: Merci de participer à l'amélioration de la carte!
Une petite remarque:
tu as utilisé la balise "name" pour mettre "antenne"...  Cette balise est destiné à recevoir le nom d'un objet. Par exemple, si tu vas au pied de l'antenne et que tu vois une plaque avec un nom, tu pourrais l'indiquer ainsi. 

En tous cas, ce n'est absolument pas grave. Si tu as une information que tu veux ajouter, mais pour laquelle tu ne sais pas comment faire, tu peux utiliser la balise "note".

Enfin OsmAnd est très pratique pour exploiter les données d'OpenStreetMap, mais pas très pratique pour contribuer. Si tu veux participer, tu peux utiliser plus facilement:
- sur Android, StreetComplete ou Vespucci (plus puissant mais plus compelxe)
- sur ordinateur, l’éditeur iD, accessible depuis le bouton "Modifier" de https://www.openstreetmap.org/ est idéal pour commencer à contribuer.

Ne te décourage pas, dans tous les cas! Et j'ai fait fait la correction.

Au plaisir, 

mav, 
contributeur berruyer
KevinP18 (2023-08-23 12:27:37+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour ces conseils et corrections, je suis effectivement débutant, et j'espère ne pas faire trop d'erreurs!

Osmand me semblait plus rapide et simple pour ajouter un simple POI (j'utilise Vespucci pour une édition plus complexe), il semblerait cependant que le champ Name soit "obligatoire" avec Osmand (ou tout du moins toujours affiché dans son interface) 

Pour le positionnement plus précis (orthophoto), pourrais-tu m'indiquer quelle sur-couche aerienne tu as utilisé ? (celles que j'ai consultées ne sont pas à jour et ne montrent pas le pylone), 
Merci ! 
Cdt
Kevin
adiatmad (2023-08-24 08:32:44+00:00): Hello, hello, your edit resulted in quite a sizable building. Maybe tag "landuse=*" might be more fitting. What do you think?

>> https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1201240037
>> https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1201238879
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140256388
csomerville (2023-08-23 06:10:49+00:00): Hello thebestmapper90210,

I noticed your recent edit where the "amenity=school" tag was removed. This is the second time this change has been made, and it was previously reverted by another community member.

It's essential to understand that the removal of the "amenity=school" tag may lead to inaccurate information on the map. If you have a specific reason for this removal, please provide detailed justification or evidence so the community can understand the rationale behind your edit.

If you are uncertain about the tagging process or require further clarification, you can consult the OpenStreetMap Wiki or engage with the community in the discussion forums or via Slack.

Please ensure that future edits align with established mapping practices and community guidelines. Your contributions are valuable, and we encourage you to continue participating in the OpenStreetMap project.
uknown-gryphus (2023-08-31 03:35:48+00:00): Hi, thank you for your changes. Generally private roads inside gated communities should be tagged as highway=residential, *not* highway=service. highway=service implies access to services, or a driveway, and these roads are neither
theranmann (2023-08-24 09:03:54+00:00): This has removed a number of correct features and/or changed them inaccurately. Look at Castle Drive. Removed residential area. inaccurately mapped grass near Blue Seas Parade. Difference between removing duplicates and just deleting/inaccurately removing items.
nevw (2023-08-24 09:54:51+00:00): Yes, I admit defeat in the attempt to fix osmi and Josm validator errors in the area. Almost every way that joins another use area has duplicated ways. There appears to be no attempt to use relations to reduce duplicated ways. 
As I dug myself deeper in to the mire, I ended up with close to a 100 conflicts to fix. Eventually I have to cut my losses and run.
I was intending to return to the area and remap everything after having a rest day.
I expect you want the area to remain untouched by me so I have reverted the changeset and resolved the resulting conflicts in favour of others.
Thanks for helping sort this out.
I will let you guys look after this area.
martien-176 (2023-08-24 18:54:24+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. 

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. 

Please watch these 2 short video for more info: 
-Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
-Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140257880
martien-176 (2023-08-24 18:54:38+00:00): Please be more careful with tracing the outlines of the buildings. Zoom in as close as possible to see the outline of the buildings, hit each corner of the building carefully. Look for shadows, open ground, changes in roof color and vegetation to differentiate buildings. Your editors' Background settings provides the opportunity to change the Brightness, Contrast etc of the imagery. This can help to see buildings etc. more clearly.

Check out these articles with basic information on how to map buildings: 
- https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140257880
MxxCon (2023-08-24 05:48:01+00:00): Hello.
It is inappropriate to tag the whole buildings as a biz if that biz occupies only part of that building. Such biz must be tagged as a separate node.
I tried to correct it, but the website of this company blocks the ability to copy/paste any text such as phone numbers and hours. This is absolutely idiotic and moronic thing to do in 2023. I'm not going to manually retype all that info.
If you know them, tell them to fix this. Otherwise, feel free to submit accurate data yourself.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140258033
postown (2023-09-02 22:33:36+00:00): 町田市立町田第一中学校についてですが、貴殿が新たに追加された建物（仮設校舎）は既に存在しないため、削除しました。今後は現地やGoogleストリートビューを確認の上で編集願います。
user_101460 (2023-09-05 07:46:34+00:00): machiroさん、こんにちは。
コメントで「Googleストリートビューを確認の上で」と書かれていますが、OSMの情報源にGoogleストリートビューを勧めてはいけません。
GoogleストリートビューもGoogleが著作権を持つ著作物ですので、OSMの情報源には他者の著作権を侵害しない物を勧めてください。

念の為にこちらもお伝えしておきます。
* https://openstreetmap.jp/node/764
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E3%82%88%E3%81%8F%E3%81%82%E3%82%8B%E8%B3%AA%E5%95%8F#%E3%81%AA%E3%81%9C%E6%89%8B%E3%81%A3%E5%8F%96%E3%82%8A%E6%97%A9%E3%81%8F_Google_%E3%83%9E%E3%83%83%E3%83%97%E3%81%AA%E3%81%A9%E3%81%AE%E3%83%87%E3%83%BC%E3%82%BF%E3%82%92%E4%BD%BF%E3%82%8F%E3%81%AA%E3%81%84%E3%81%AE%E3%81%A7%E3%81%99%E3%81%8B%EF%BC%9F

現状との食い違っているなら現地確認するのが一番良いですね。さらに良くするのであればエビデンスとして写真をWikimedia commons(https://commons.wikimedia.org/)などにアップしたり、Mapillary(https://www.mapillary.com/)を使ってストリートビューを撮ったりしてソースに書くとよいです。
MongolianPlateau (2023-09-06 07:28:18+00:00): Hello machiro and nogajun, thank you for your comments. Looking at this area again with other resources I see that these buildings no longer exist; I appreciate you removing them. I will continue to aim to utilize the most recent resources available for use in OSM. Happy mapping!

Automatic Translation:

こんにちは、machiro さん、nogajun さん、コメントありがとうございます。 他のリソースを使用してこのエリアをもう一度見てみると、これらの建物はもう存在していないことがわかります。 削除していただけるとありがたいです。 今後も OSM で使用できる最新のリソースを活用することを目指していきます。 マッピングを楽しんでください。
eggie (2023-08-23 07:24:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM..
I merged your info with the present addressnode.
Greetz,
eggie
Herman Lee (2023-08-24 11:13:13+00:00): 您好，注意一下，您的编辑导致了几条公交线路的破坏
silversurfer83 (2023-08-23 13:41:33+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OSM :)

Du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand deine Änderung ansieht. Das bedeutet einfach nur, dass jemand anderes mal nachsieht, was du hier so getan hast.
Mich würde interessieren, warum du die Feuerwehr noch mal zusätzlich als Punkt eintragen möchtest obwohl die gleichen Informationen schon am Gebäude hinterlegt sind?
Grundsätzlich halte ich es für gut Informationen zu trennen (also einmal das reine Gebäude und alles was sich nur auf das Gebäude bezieht und einmal die, möglicherweise wechselnde, Nutzung innerhalb des Gebäudes).

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140258959
martien-176 (2023-08-24 19:06:09+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. 

The buildings you mapped are well done.

As to the highways: the long residential road running west to east is connecting several settlement and should be better retagged as unclassified. The shorter side roads you mapped and tagged as track. But since these give access to houses they would be better tagged as residential.

Please watch these 2 short video for more info: 
-Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
-Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ 

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140259374
MxxCon (2023-08-24 05:49:23+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete many of the stop signs in this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140259522
hwierzbicki (2023-08-24 12:12:59+00:00): I converted them to a node on the road where they occur, which is the correct way to represent them (as per the documentation).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140259522
MxxCon (2023-08-24 12:55:01+00:00): I'm not sure what documentation you are referencing, but https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dstop#Tagging_minor_road_stops is pretty clear on how to map things. Putting stop signs at stop positions is a perfectly valid and more detailed way to map than putting them at way intersections.
Further more, it is the only correct way to tag them where only 1 road has to stop.

This needs to be corrected since data consumers, especially routers are affected by this.
hwierzbicki (2023-08-24 13:05:11+00:00): My edit should have only affected standalone nodes (at traffic signs) which were not accompanied by a node on the adjacent way. Per the documentation:

"Insert a node with tag highway=stop on the approach way(s) that must stop, at the stopping point. Drivers may be required to give way (yield) whether or not a physical sign is present; but if you also want to capture the signs, you can use a traffic_sign=* tag as well"

(where "as well" is emphasized within the documentation).
MxxCon (2023-08-25 19:07:46+00:00): Intersections near nodes 42930736, 42930738, 42919500, 42812804. "Commonwealth Boulevard" doesn't have stop signs. Intersecting streets do. So the fact that you put stop signs directly on intersections incorrectly indicates that drivers on Commonwealth Boulevard must stop too, which they don't.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140259522
eggie (2023-08-23 09:06:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Svp niet name=...  gebruiken om iets te beschrijven.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-08-23 07:27:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM... I removed your castle.. No castle without name present here at this very spot.
Greetz,
eggie
literan (2023-08-23 17:17:30+00:00): вообще-то с севера стоит знак "баранка", а это именно motor_vehicle=destination
berndw (2023-08-29 16:34:29+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Ich habe einige Hinweise zu diesem Changeset.
Ein Name allein wird nicht angezeigt, dazu gehören immer noch weitere Eigenschaften, Beispiele findest Du hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide 

Schulische Einrichtungen bekommen zumindest ein amenity=school 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dschool

Falls Du Fragen hast, antworte einfach hier, ich werde dann benachrichtigt.

Bernd
martien-176 (2023-08-24 18:57:29+00:00): Please wait with uploading till you mapped several features (eg buildings). That way you work faster. It also makes it easier for validators to judge the quality of your mappings. Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140261041
Aleksey Gorelikov (2023-08-23 07:46:07+00:00): Added "Rua Doutor Francisco Martins Carneiro" road name according to local user request   #mapbox_contribute
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140261364
MaryiaKuklis1111 (2023-08-23 14:13:19+00:00): Added street name based on user's feedback #mapbox_contribute
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140261364
adiatmad (2023-08-24 07:23:53+00:00): Helloo,

Adding a descriptive name like "name=building, playground, etc" to OpenStreetMap might not be recommended. However, don't worry, there are some additional learning resources available to help you out.
Happy mapping!

>> https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1201257447
>> https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1201257013
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
>> Beginner's Mapping guide: https://osm.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide.
 >> Self-paced learning modules for intermediate/advanced mappers: https://learnosm.org
adreamy (2023-10-13 04:49:07+00:00): Tags should only represent properties.
Do not use tags for descriptions.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
Alexmol (2023-08-23 08:06:13+00:00): There was a water tap on the corner by the recycling containers. Was it removed ?
osmviborg (2023-08-23 08:15:45+00:00): Hej. Undlad venligst at tilføje adresse- oplysninger på polygoner/bygninger, det bruger vi ikke i DK.
JohnnyPedersen (2023-08-23 08:27:26+00:00): Skal jeg selv fjerne ændringen igen eller sker det "automatisk"?
osmviborg (2023-08-23 08:34:17+00:00): Jeg har har fjernet dem.
JohnnyPedersen (2023-08-23 08:48:35+00:00): Tak.
eggie (2023-08-23 08:54:50+00:00): Beste BalazsV

Dit soort acties geeft schade aan de kaart. Wat is je bedoeling?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140262411

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-08-23 08:56:45+00:00): natural	=coastline?

Dit is gewoon onzin
eggie (2023-08-23 09:03:44+00:00): Reverted by changeset #140264875

Schuiven met de kaart geeft vaak schade door het onbedoeld verplaatsen van objecten met alles dat er aan vastzit.
Je maakt ook van een footway een coastline over een deel van Den Haag?
MVG
eggie
BalazsVnew (2023-08-25 08:25:05+00:00): Beste Eggie,

Mijn excuus! Was mijn eerste dag op de site / service. En via mobiel (Maps.me app) erop gekomen. Wilde slechts wijzigingen en extra informatie aanbrengen op toilet- / watertap-punten die ik zelf in de app had aangemaakt. Wist niet dat ik andere wijzigingen onbedoeld ook had gemaakt (met het schuiven over de kaart, blijkt nu).
Onwetendheid is geen excuus voor - slechts mijn verklaring voor - mijn fouten. Nogmaals sorry.
eggie (2023-08-25 09:22:51+00:00): Hoi...

Editor iD is berucht met dat schuiven..  Dat komt omdat je met de linkermuis  iets selecteert, maar er ook mee schuift.
De betere editor JOSM laat de kaart verschuiven met de rechtermuisknop. Dan kan het niet gebeuren. 
Dan schuift met zo'n node alles mee incl het wegennet.
Er wordt je overigens niets kwalijk genomen.
Veel plezier met mappen.
eggie
SekeRob (2023-09-26 16:36:11+00:00): Ciao Marco

Si prega di leggere il wiki degli indirizzi specifico per l'Italia.  I numeri civici/indirizzi si trovano nel punto in cui si trova l'ingresso in un nodo separato.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses

ciao
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-10-27 20:51:05+00:00): Hi, maybe you've added it by accident but no way there is a left turn from Gonsiori to Kaubamaja here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1054298624
I'll remove it
silversurfer83 (2023-08-23 11:27:55+00:00): Hi there :)

Please check this node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1124155036/history and make really sure there is a traffic signal on that stream.

Cheers
silversurfer83
rskedgell (2023-08-23 13:33:10+00:00): I wonder if this could be a bug in iD? Presumably the edited node was intended to be somewhere in Kota Kinabalu rather than British Columbia?
Awoobis (2023-08-23 17:05:48+00:00): I hate being stuck in traffic on stream...
silversurfer83 (2023-08-25 16:25:30+00:00): Dear IlhamYasmeen,

are you going to check your traffic light or should I just delete it?

Also: Please react to comments. It's how we communicate on OSM changes.
silversurfer83 (2023-08-28 09:24:56+00:00): Well. I removed the traffic light.

Please react to comments!
silversurfer83 (2023-08-28 09:25:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140484743
GrabMY_IlhamYasmeen (2023-08-29 05:59:54+00:00): Hello, there might be a mistake. Yes, please do so if this is correct based on your jurisdiction
mueschel (2023-08-26 11:18:37+00:00): Hi,
please check the objects you added - there are more than 20 ways with foreign tags that shouldn't be in OSM, e.g. this one:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1201267345
eggie (2023-08-23 09:01:40+00:00): reverted by changeset #140264875

Deze changeset is teruggedraaid omdat de voorgaande changeset de kaart beschadigde.
MVG
eggie
Jrachi (2023-08-24 06:49:20+00:00): Hai rotto la relazione del D19

Ciao, Ivo
user_19359683 (2023-08-23 11:17:46+00:00): تعليق صغير لا يضرك
Bienson (2023-08-23 18:14:25+00:00): Parkplatz-Multipolygon gefixt, verschobene U-Bahnlinie korrigiert:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140288178
aixbrick (2023-08-23 13:11:54+00:00): Hallo,
die Frage bedeutet, ob Fußgänger verboten sind ("prohibited", Zeichen 259). Das ist hier aber nicht der Fall, daher wieder gelöscht (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140275844). Das bloße Fehlen eines Bürgersteigs bedeutet nicht zwangsläufig ein Fußgänger-Verbot.
Gruß
GerdP (2024-07-10 09:06:59+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Ich verstehe nicht, was Du hier gemacht hast. Sind die Straßen jetzt mit dem Rad in beide Richtungen befahrbar oder nicht? Der verlinkte source würde das doch erwarten lassen und in OSM sind auch Knotenpunktrouten über diese Einbahnstraßen erfasst, die beim jetzigen Tagging dann teilweise geschoben werden müssten, z.B. auf der Ahrstraße https://www.osm.org/way/330780361
Carto'Cité (2023-12-12 18:23:30+00:00): Bonjour
Je te contacte pour avoir quelques informations complémentaires sur ce chemin : 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205023261
Le passer en 
bicycle=designated
foot=designated
signifient qu'il y aurait clairement une signalétique qui invite les cyclistes et les piétons à l'emprunter. C'est le cas par exemple lorsqu'on a un panneau voie verte C115 ou l'association de plusieurs panneaux vélo piéton ou alors des pictogrammes au sol. Là il semblerait qu'il ne s'agit que d'un simple chemin comme on le voit sur les photos Mapillary :
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1637545219929672
Il ne faut pas confondre les autorisations qui sont implicites pour les piétons et les cyclistes sur un highway=path, il ne faut pas les confondre avec le fait que l'aménagement est dédié (designated).
si c'est le cas là c'est qu'il y aurait eu des travaux et l'ajout de signalétique. Sinon il faut le repasser en simple path et éventuellement ajouter surface=ground est_width=0.5, segregated=no.
Je modifie dans ce sens et je te laisse  me dire si je me suis trompé et dans ce cas j'annulerai ma modification 🙂
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
ManOnDaMoon (2023-12-12 18:53:40+00:00): Bonjour, je confirme qu'il s'agit d'un simple chemin forestier sans signalisation. Il ne fait pas non plus partie d'un chemin de randonnée ou d'un sentier Denecourt en forêt de Fontainebleau.
Carto'Cité (2023-12-13 07:58:06+00:00): Merci pour ton retour !
Charles
g7kse (2023-08-23 09:30:36+00:00): It changes quite often between a restaurant and b&b. It never actually looks open. Cycle past it every day and only ever seen the owner, no guests.
tekim (2024-03-05 01:21:17+00:00): Hello, thanks for your interest in OpenStreetMap.  However, for legal reasons, we are not allowed to use Google Street View when making edits.
user_5359 (2023-08-23 17:10:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys).
impiaaa (2023-08-23 18:25:59+00:00): Please use the changeset comment field to describe what you changed and why. For example, "Added speed limits from signs in street-level imagery." More examples and guidelines can be found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
themrdey123 (2023-08-23 09:49:39+00:00): Vielen Dank für deine Mühen👍
kopfnuss0000 (2023-08-23 09:50:13+00:00): Gerne, das war es mir Wert. 😉
DaveF (2023-08-24 17:17:20+00:00): This hasn't been a McColls since February.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125481788/history

https://my.morrisons.com/storefinder/31463/morrisons-daily-twerton-105-high-street

You appear to be using old data.
CjMalone (2023-08-24 19:36:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125481788 seems to be tagged as a Morrisons Daily not McColl's.

Am I missing something.
DaveF (2023-08-24 19:51:02+00:00): https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/125481788
CjMalone (2023-08-24 19:53:53+00:00): Yes, I added 3 operator tags in v17