piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
wille (2023-03-23 17:59:44+00:00): O histórico do objeto é uma forma de garantir a veracidade da informação, pois podemos ver o que foi modificado ao longo do tempo. Manter esse histórico é também uma forma de respeito aos usuários que contribuíram para o mapa ao longo dos anos.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134027855
BaianaFilo (2023-03-23 18:15:18+00:00): entendi! e mover o objeto também interfere no histórico ?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134027855
wille (2023-03-23 18:20:42+00:00): Mover o objeto preserva o histórico.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-04-22 14:02:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135228709, 135225625 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to fictional edits.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-23 15:40:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10756350645
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1156644624

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-23 15:40:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10756350644
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1156644162

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-23 15:50:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10756350646
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153652154

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fra00 (2023-03-25 09:38:42+00:00): Puoi spiegare perché hai vandalizzato la mappa, riportando la strada a volumi che non esistono più dopo i lavori?

Could you explain the reason why you wrongly edited the map, drawing the street in a way that does no longer exist?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-23 15:50:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3394740081
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395819451

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_3022894 (2023-05-06 16:45:24+00:00): Hallo Michael,

du hattest glaube ich den Zahnarzt Dr. med. dent. Achim Gauchel mit dem Eintrag https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10311450095/history bereits hinzugefügt 

(jetzt ist der Zahnarzt zwei Mal eingetragen), eventuell hast du das bei deiner Eintragung in diesem Changeset übersehen.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
mikiscom (2023-05-08 19:23:35+00:00): Hallo Lukas,

das dürfte davon kommen, weil ich den 1x per Organic Maps eingetragen hatte, da nicht mehr dran gedacht hatte und später über die Webseite oder umgekehrt. Kannst Du die Version mit weniger Details raus nehmen?

Viele Grüße

Michael
user_3022894 (2023-05-09 18:12:54+00:00): Hallo Michael,

klar, gerne, habe ich so umgesetzt.
Danke für die schnelle Antwort!

Viele Grüße
Lukas
VictorIE (2026-05-12 09:44:49+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10756372362/

By itself, beer doesn't seem like a mappable object.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-25 15:15:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134107342 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism and creating fake springs with nonsense names at random places.
A67-A67 (2023-03-24 09:34:50+00:00): Hallo,

Dit soort wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1156650177 zijn incorrect. Verf scheidt rijstroken van elkaar, geen rijbanen. Tussen rijbanen ligt een fysieke scheiding, zoals een berm, middeneiland of verhoging. 

Rijbanen wordt als aparte ways gemapt. Rijstroken met lane-tags op de ways.
eggie (2023-03-24 10:32:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134029720

A67  Pak jij het hier even aan. Want het is in meer changesets fout gegaan?
Ook is de routerelatie stuk.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-03-24 10:41:13+00:00): De kluifrotonde heeft dacht ik wel fysieke afscheidingen hier. Dus dat zou kunnen kloppen.
A67-A67 (2023-03-24 10:54:48+00:00): Ik heb het niet-bestaande rijbaanscheidingen bij de t-splitsing ten westen van de A27 verwijderd. 

De kluifrotonde aan de oostkant is inderdaad een turborotonde. Sommigen zien dat als rijstroken en anderen als rijbanen. Daar is discussie over. Het zomaar aanpassen van de ene naar de andere tagging lijkt me niet gewenst.

Ik heb het hier maar laten staan. Het was voor de aanpassingen wel een gedetailleerd getagde rotonde, waardoor de aanpassingen nogal wat fouten hebben opgeleverd met destination-, surface- en lanes-tags.
eggie (2023-03-24 11:02:39+00:00): Thanks A67 A67...
... 
RR Ik zet hier even de link naar de aanwijzingen op alle changesets.  - Wellicht heb je daar nog wat aan.
Editor iD is niet geschikt om te werken  met wegen waar routerelaties lopen. Die gaan dan allemaal stuk zodra je knipt. 
Het is verschillende malen genoemd. O.a. ook het onterecht intekenen van aparte rijbanen. 

Dit soort klussen zijn voor specialisten..  Dat word je natuurlijk wel door het gewoon te doen.
Dan gaat het in het begin gewoon vaak fout. 
Wel met JOSM. 
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=13982531

Lees hier nog even de aanwijzingen waarmee ervaren mappers je hebben proberen te helpen.
MVG
eggie
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-25 15:15:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134107342 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism and creating fake springs with nonsense names at random places.
ivanbranco (2023-04-04 11:17:29+00:00): Ciao piemaio,

qualcosa è andato storto. Alcuni dei file commons che hai linkato non esistono, vedi:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10756369663
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:It-pr-ldpPx41It-pr-ldpPx40.jpg

riesci a sistemare?
eggie (2023-03-24 10:29:00+00:00): Het ziet er mooi uit, maar... 
Ook hier een routeraltie die geheel verstoord  ligt. 
Ook hier teken je aparte rijbanen die er niet zijn. 
MVG
eggie
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-24 03:37:20+00:00): make sure to follow import guidelines. These changes are being reverted.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-26 06:16:21+00:00): Nilaksh, please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6995. Graeme Fitzpatrick, OSMF Data Working Group
user_5359 (2023-03-24 15:29:12+00:00): Hello! Please note that the key is_in:country is not necessary because the borders of Uganda are well known. But it is recommended not to write the key as is:in_country
eggie (2023-03-23 16:37:02+00:00): Dag L Zandman.. Je vraagt feedback.

Meestal zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van de regel oneway=yes middels een onderbord.
Is dat hier ook het geval?

Dan toevoegen 
oneway:bicycle=no

Indien nodig ook voor moped en mofa.

MVG
eggie
LZandman (2023-03-27 09:05:50+00:00): Ik zal het even nakijken binnenkort. Het is gewoon een woonwijk, dus fietsen, brommers, enz. gaan alle kanten op.
eggie (2023-03-27 09:09:22+00:00): Top!
GullibleMappazo (2023-03-23 16:38:56+00:00): i accidentally clicked commit before changing the comment
i meant to say that i added a reaturaunt
Tomas_J (2026-01-13 23:53:22+00:00): Ahoj, prosim, nelep landuses na cesty (napr. Way: 1156699986), neda sa s nimi potom dobre pracovat.
risk0 (2026-01-14 08:30:35+00:00): ok. budem si na to davat pozor. vdaka za upozornenie. opravil si to?
Tomas_J (2026-01-14 08:35:05+00:00): Trochu som niečo odlepil, kde som chcel deliť cestu a pridávať na ňu priechody a značky, ale ostatne som nechal tak - je toho veľa tak nech si to odlepi ten kto bude editovať cestu v budúcnosti :)
BaianaFilo (2023-03-24 11:56:42+00:00): A Tag está correta! Todos os moradores no Corredor da Vitória, onde moro, chamam de "Teleférico"! https://www.estadao.com.br/brasil/acidente-com-teleferico-fere-3-em-salvador/ e https://hotel-sol-victoria-marina-salvador-de-bahia.vivehotels.com/ . Você está desfazendo o que está correto! .
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134031764
BaianaFilo (2023-03-24 11:55:33+00:00): Imagem do que são os teleféricos no Corredor da Vitória ! https://hotel-sol-victoria-marina-salvador-de-bahia.vivehotels.com/ .Você está danificando o mapa. Reveja sua avaliação!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134031811
ottwiz (2023-03-24 16:35:05+00:00): Szia! Picit túl nagy lett a changeseted. Melyik másik országba sikerült elmozgatnod valami nodeot? :)
NieWnen (2023-03-26 08:53:19+00:00): Pełno duplikatów węzłów do poprawienia wynikających z nakładania się landuse na płoty (i nie łączenia ich). To powinno zostać połączone.
Dodko (2024-02-05 19:00:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2628853789/history
sú tu opačne orientačné čísla oproti registru adries?
kayle (2024-02-06 05:28:55+00:00): Musí preveriť, pôvodné (ak si dobre vybavujem, lebo som sa tu trocha "túlal" a už to bolo dávno) boli zbierané v teréne ale chybu nevylučujem.
Dodko (2024-02-06 06:52:06+00:00): Pozri potom všetky 3 bytovky 634, 633 a 632.
Uvidím aj čo odpovedia z MÚ.
kayle (2024-02-06 15:32:09+00:00): Stav 6.2.2023
632 začína dole 7. 
633 aktuálne nemá žiadne čísla, čerstvo robená fasáda, ešte mali palety miesto zábradlia pri vchode. 
634 začína dole 23.
Dodko (2024-02-06 16:23:50+00:00): OK, opraví sa v registri adries, v OSM je v poriadku, ref:minvskaddress som opravil lebo boli opačne.
kayle (2024-02-07 08:13:16+00:00): Vďaka. A ehem... samozrejme som myslel 6.2.2024, ale včera som vypisoval nejaké 2023 dátumy, som ostal seknutý v minulom roku :)
wille (2023-03-23 18:42:00+00:00): Você está mapeando com a tag errada. A tag que você usou é para bondinhos elevados https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:aerialway%3Dcable_car

Nesse caso é funicular: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dfunicular
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134033417
BaianaFilo (2023-03-23 18:58:07+00:00): A Tag está correta! Todos os moradores no Corredor da Vitória, onde moro, chamam de "Teleférico"! https://www.estadao.com.br/brasil/acidente-com-teleferico-fere-3-em-salvador/ . Você está desfazendo o que está correto!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134033417
BaianaFilo (2023-03-23 19:01:16+00:00): A estrutura dos Teleféricos de todos os prédio que tem acesso ao mar no Corredor da Vitória são as mesmas! https://www.tripadvisor.com.br/LocationPhotoDirectLink-g303272-d6576616-i120746496-Mahi_Mahi-Salvador_State_of_Bahia.html . Por favor corrija novamente!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134033417
BaianaFilo (2023-03-23 19:05:07+00:00): O Iacht Clube era bondinho mais agora é Teleférico também ! Corrija !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134033417
BaianaFilo (2023-03-23 19:21:01+00:00): Imagem do que são os teleféricos no Corredor da Vitória e Yacht Clube da Bahia ! https://hotel-sol-victoria-marina-salvador-de-bahia.vivehotels.com/ . Corrija para Tag correta!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134033417
BaianaFilo (2023-03-23 19:25:36+00:00): Verifique sua avaliação negativa !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134033417
Barroszt (2024-04-20 23:57:07+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150283577
wireguy (2023-03-25 12:57:19+00:00): Luca, welcome to osm!   the relation you updated is missing sections now.  Maybe it's just a work in progress...  Keep mapping
Luca Fariello (2023-03-27 12:17:31+00:00): Is there a way that I can send a color coded tax map showing the property owners of the Preserve and someone can update the boundaries? Most of the land in Great Piece Meadows is open to the public.
wireguy (2023-03-27 12:32:02+00:00): Probably first depends on the source and license of the information.   please read https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_Compatibility
Barroszt (2024-04-20 23:56:59+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150283574
Barroszt (2024-04-20 23:56:50+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150283572
Barroszt (2024-04-20 23:56:35+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150283567
Barroszt (2024-04-20 23:56:27+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150283565
Barroszt (2024-04-20 23:56:18+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150283562
Barroszt (2024-04-20 23:56:11+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150283560
user_1566574 (2023-11-19 13:56:53+00:00): Hello !
Pour information, je transforme ce chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/717851395 de highway=footway à highway=path, qui me semble plus approprié.
Merci de tes contribs !
Glassman (2023-03-24 18:21:05+00:00): I took the liberty to try the better align the building outline with the roof. Hate those architects that use crazy angles in their design.

Feel free to improve
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134034313
Barroszt (2024-04-20 23:56:00+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150283557
Barroszt (2024-04-20 23:53:16+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150283515
Barroszt (2024-04-20 23:54:22+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150283531
Barroszt (2024-04-20 23:54:33+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150283535
LeNetsi (2023-03-24 21:01:46+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2022-10-15.
Barroszt (2024-04-20 23:54:43+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150283539
AntMadeira (2023-03-23 19:49:07+00:00): Olá, Técnico JD.
Esta área que adicionaste, além de não fazer qualquer sentido, os seus limites não são verificáveis, que é um dos elementos essenciais do OpenStreetMap.
O ponto de localidade já existe, e é tudo o que é necessário.

Tens aqui mais informações:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3%A1ticas

Também tens o canal da comunidade portuguesa de OSM no Telegram, onde poderás esclarecer estas e outras dúvidas:
https://t.me/OSMPortugal

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
Langlaeufer (2023-03-24 07:37:33+00:00): Hallo Berung,
ich hab ein wenig nachgearbeitet: Lage, Nachbarweg und Anschluss an die Straße und überflüssig Attribute.
Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134035163
berung (2023-03-24 12:05:42+00:00): Danke für die Nacharbeit. Fuß- und Radweg enden zwar (wie von mir vorher eingetragen) im Süden separat voneinander an der Hauptstraße. Aber sei's drum, Hauptsache das Routing funktioniert sowohl für den Fuß- als auch für den Radverkehr.
Langlaeufer (2023-03-24 12:40:30+00:00): Das Routing hätte auch vorher gehen sollen. Der einzelnen Weg war als Rad- und Fußweg eingetragen. Der Anschluss an den Altenbekener Damm sieht mir im Luftbild aber nicht baulich getrennt aus sondern hat lediglich zwei verschiedene Oberflächen, oder?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134035163
vojtechzaboril (2023-03-23 18:25:44+00:00): Plus ostranění "plánované" silnice.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-23 18:30:38+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9080778295
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1156759467

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2024-04-20 23:54:58+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150283544
Barroszt (2024-04-20 23:55:09+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150283545
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-23 18:50:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2188855141
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430025239

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NavierStokes (2023-03-24 05:57:59+00:00): Hi rkuebert, is the foodway rescricted in any way(private)? Can we add a surface?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134036745
rkuebert (2023-03-24 07:14:22+00:00): Hi NavierStokes, the footway is public. I forgot to add the value for surface,  paving_stones is appropriate.
NavierStokes (2023-03-24 07:45:54+00:00): Perfect, thanks!
jeslop (2023-03-23 21:50:43+00:00): Hola DianaViajAut. Para esto tipo de acciones la etiqueta más adecuada sería https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:proposed.
Los cambio y también elimino las mayúsculas.

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
user_5359 (2023-03-26 17:25:49+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1156776637. What is the meaning of the tag Marco = Leonardi ?
AlejandroAlba (2023-03-26 21:36:53+00:00): a wrong copy & paste tag.   Thanks for the warning!!
Frans S (2023-03-26 16:10:51+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Your mappings are a rather accurate, however, not squared.
Each building need to be squared with the Q key ! Keep that in mind at further mappings.
Best regards
silversurfer83 (2023-03-24 07:32:18+00:00): Hey 
Looks pretty neat, what you did recently :)

One thing I'd like to say on this edit:
The footway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1156777866/) you added as a continuation of
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14174081/ looks like a highway=track or highway=service to me. At least two sets of aerial images show clear signs of two tracked vehicles on that way so I wouldn't go with footway on that, except you were there personally. Than you should put that in your source.

Generally, giving your source would be greatly appreciated (like "aerial images" or "survey", depending on where you got your info)

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134037281
hoserab (2023-04-06 00:26:01+00:00): Hi jmilot,

Appreciate your efforts to contribute to the map, but may I ask why you made these changes? You've added name=Plus 15 Skywalk tags to the ways that constitute the Plus 15 system, which is both unnecessary because there's a relation that encompasses all of these ways already called Plus 15, and erroneous because "Skywalk" is descriptive and not part of the name of the Plus 15 system anyway. It's like tagging a sidewalk with name=sidewalk or a road segment with name=road.

You've also added service=Plus 15 Skywalk and in some instances surface=Plus 15 Skywalk (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338913941/), which is erroneous because the service=* tag should be used to elaborate on a highway=service road (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service#Highways). I presume the surface=* tags were simply a copy-paste typo.
JJIglesias (2023-03-23 21:02:21+00:00): Thanks for the edition , but this is NO a formal terminal for ferrys as such
suchAnight (2023-03-24 22:51:47+00:00): Hello JJIglesias. Thank you for reaching out. I see that you added the ferry=yes and public_transport=station tags to the node in a later version than this one. Curious if you have any local knowledge of this crossing? To me it looks like there may be a small boat ferrying people over the river or possibly a self-operated ferry at this location. This is why I added the amenity=ferry_terminal tag to the node based on the OSM wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=ferry_terminal) which did not mention the needed characteristics of a terminal to get that tagging. If you are aware of any other way that it could be modeled differently (other than a ferry route) please let me know... I’ll defer to your suggestion.
Thanks for your time and have a great day.
JJIglesias (2023-03-25 03:00:38+00:00): Has been there several years ago, and yes there a smal boat to ferry 2 cars at best or a small truck (I crossed with an ATV), I paid for the crossing to the boat operator, but at each shore at such there is nothing but the end of the roads and sand. It is basically the same at other rivers crossing in different areas of the Bolivian North
Thanks and Best Regards
JJ
suchAnight (2023-03-27 22:39:54+00:00): The information on this ferry (and similar ones) is very helpful! Thanks for that and Happy Mapping.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-26 12:21:47+00:00): Why you, again (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/984764254/history ) deleted pedestrian square mapped as named pedestrian square? I fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135384391
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-04 15:55:27+00:00): Please answer this question, before deleting it again like you did in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244772925/history
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-04 15:55:40+00:00): In changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137886501
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-04 15:59:09+00:00): And http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=137425201
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-21 17:37:45+00:00): Seems fixed now, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244772925/history
LateNightTone (2026-06-16 12:35:53+00:00): Hi @ramthelinefeed, just checking back to an old changeset here in relation to a note nearby. I see you tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231512205/history/4 with the name Dam Lane, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3162393 suggests the name Walsh's Lane. Would you have any input or preference here? I wasn't sure what the source might have been for Dam Lane.
ramthelinefeed (2026-06-16 14:34:30+00:00): The various names for PRoWs in Dundrum a bit vague. Re-checking OSNI & PRONI sources, they fail to have any names for them at all. 
https://www.newrymournedown.org/media/uploads/nmddc_access_to_the_countryside_procedures.pdf calls this one 'Dam Walk', I think.  There are also a few fingerposts and 'Places that Time Forgot' signs around the area, not all of which agree with each other. 
The lane itself contains a PRoW which does go to the dam. Perhaps put 'Walsh's Lane' as an alt_name tag?