piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2023-07-06 02:34:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138168600 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-06 02:34:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138168600 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
ivanbranco (2023-07-06 08:00:39+00:00): Hi evanvosberg, 

please stop deleting it without engaging in a discussion with the other user before, edit wars are no good.
mavl (2023-07-06 02:35:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138168600 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-06 02:35:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138168600 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
Emilius123 (2023-07-06 14:07:30+00:00): -- REVERTED in # 138190322 --

Hello evanvosberg,

I am hereby reverting this changeset. As has been already pointed out in the discussions of other changesets of yours, just deleting paths that exist is not the right method.

Should you do any more undiscussed deletions, the DWG will be informed.
Emilius123 (2023-07-06 14:12:56+00:00): I would also like to point out that if these edits are made for Komoot, you need to follow the Organised Editing guidelines.
mavl (2023-07-06 02:35:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138168600 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-06 02:34:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138168600 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-06 02:34:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138168600 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-06 02:34:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138168600 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-07-06 01:09:30+00:00): Hi, When you reconnect the two way_id into one here. It makes damage to the relation 16054027.
Riyadi IRM-RV (2023-07-06 01:18:51+00:00): Hi saigongiadinh1698. thank you for the correction. I do some armchair mapping. I think it takes the same segment with name and class too.
I'll revert to the original one.

thank you
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-07-06 01:53:06+00:00): Hi Riyadi, you're welcome. Just to be sure we're both share the same page. Since in intersection like this and to create turn restriction, we care about every fraction (way_id) in it to make a turn restriction work for public.
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-06 03:50:46+00:00): Why did you get rid of the golf cartpath bridge that is still clearly mapped?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138167297
mavl (2023-07-06 02:35:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138168600 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-06 02:34:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138168600 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-06 02:34:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138168600 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
hoserab (2023-07-06 01:11:56+00:00): To anyone who reviews these changes, N.B. that for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1187719542 parking is only allowed for taxis; however. the conditional no-stopping restriction applies to all potential users *including* taxis. I am otherwise unsure how to tag access here.

To be clear: anyone can *stop* here at any hours except Mo-Fr 07:00-08:30 & 15:30-18:00, but no one can *park* here except taxis (at any hour, except when the no-stopping restrictions apply). Make sense?
AngocA (2023-07-18 23:19:58+00:00): Hola osm972. Ya estás en el grupo de Telegram de la comunidad de Colombia - https://t.me/osmco

Me gustaría poder hablar contigo. Estamos buscando fortalecer la comunidad de Colombia.
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-06 03:42:53+00:00): Why did you get rid of the parking lot ways and other features that were already mapped correctly?

Don't delete things that are already correctly mapped.  This changeset has been reverted in part or full.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138167720
carstoni92 (2023-07-06 04:57:43+00:00): The current mapping was done pretty poorly, so I’m refining the entire property. It will take a few days so there will likely be gaps in the meantime.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138167720
rskedgell (2023-07-06 07:03:57+00:00): Adding micro parks to OSM doesn't work for cheating at Pokémon Go any more, so this bit of vandalism was rather pointless. It's also been reverted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138167855
mavl (2023-07-06 02:34:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138168600 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-06 02:35:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138168600 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-06 02:34:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138168600 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-06 02:35:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138168600 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-06 02:34:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138168600 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
rskedgell (2023-07-06 06:51:02+00:00): Grow up.

Vandalism reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138173730
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138168006
SomeoneElse (2024-05-07 21:41:47+00:00): Just in case you're not aware, this changeset was mentioned at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-get-an-importer-s-attention/110565/24 .
kn1ghtman (2024-05-21 20:17:13+00:00): This changeset deleted some of my updates. Please contact me so we can get these restored.
Thanks.
cs09736 (2023-07-07 02:42:32+00:00): Should the footpaths at the dandenong road crossing be tagged as bicycle=dismount? I was here not long ago and I couldn't see anything indicating bicycle access meaning that any cyclists would have to dismount when they cross from the road. The tag would improve bicycle routing
cs09736 (2023-07-07 03:18:38+00:00): Just went and surveyed and no specific bike signage is there so I'll add the dismount tags for now. Feel free to change back if you disagree though.
mavl (2023-07-06 02:35:15+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 138087918, 138087950, 138087980, 138087999, 138088021, 138088047, 138088070, 138088081, 138088114, 138088125, 138088150, 138088175, 138088184, 138088199, 138088221, 138088246, 138088252, 138088256, 138088280, 138088287, 138088301, 138088311, 138088324, 138088349, 138088353, 138088392, 138088403, 138088408, 138088431, 138088466, 138088486, 138088496, 138088584, 138088590, 138088618, 138088641, 138088650, 138088669, 138088700, 138088717, 138166696, 138166716, 138166773, 138166778, 138166802, 138166812, 138166828, 138166834, 138166858, 138166869, 138166878, 138166886, 138166894, 138166899, 138166927, 138166933, 138166957, 138167300, 138167317, 138167326, 138167340, 138167349, 138167364, 138167382, 138167930, 138167934, 138167965, 138167982, 138167995, 138168003, 138168005.
eggie (2023-07-06 07:33:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Mark046 (2023-07-10 05:22:16+00:00): Thanks!
nevw (2023-07-06 12:32:20+00:00): Hi
The line you deleted is an address interpolation line
See the “using interpolation” at this wiki link
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses
I’ll revert this so you can see if it serves a purpose or not
jessica-rod (2023-07-06 03:10:52+00:00): Also corrected number of lanes on Eglinton Ave between Yonge St and Redpath Ave
emersonveenstra (2023-07-07 10:39:19+00:00): Hey, looks like you have a typo in your opening hours "Su 13:-21:00"
treestryder (2023-07-08 17:43:03+00:00): Fixed.
h551w (2023-07-06 20:44:08+00:00): Ha, just glad to help out!
Supaplex (2023-07-06 05:51:32+00:00): Hi

Is there any change of control of island? If not, you should not change the language of the main name field
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138169955
mavl (2023-07-06 04:30:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138170423 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-06 04:30:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138170423 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-14 10:16:40+00:00): tu as créé un batiment recouvrant tous les autres ?
en fait Behoririka c'est une "zone" plutôt avec de la vente et qui comprend des batiment des 2 coté de la rue N7 ?
mavl (2023-07-06 04:30:29+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 138170158, 138170196.
BaboucheVerte (2023-08-27 01:52:18+00:00): Hi, shouldn't be access=destination instead ?
silversurfer83 (2023-07-06 06:57:57+00:00): Moin Niklas,

herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

Warum hast du für diesen kurzen Abschnitt Fußgänger auf verboten gesetzt?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138171159
leaveAmark (2023-07-06 07:10:24+00:00): Moin!
Ich habe eigentlich nur Zugang für Fahrrad geöffnet. Es gibt zwar einen Fahrrad- und Fußgängerweg direkt neben der Straße, der taugt aber fürs Rennrad nicht. Die Korrektur der Zugangsrechte fürs Rad zielte darauf ab, dass man Programmen wie Komoot auch optional sagen kann, die Route über die Straße zu planen. Das geht aktuell nämlich nicht.
Gerne kannst du auch den Zugang für Fußgänger freigeben, das halte ich aber aufgrund des Weges nicht unbedingt für nötig.

Viele Grüße zurück!
silversurfer83 (2023-07-06 07:19:59+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung,

die Zugangsberechtigungen für Wege werden idR nur nach rechtlichen Gesichtspunkten gesetzt und haben erstmal nichts damit zu tun, wie wir gerne von verschiedenen Kartendiensten geroutet werden möchten.
Wenn du magst, kannst du Oberflächengüte und Material des Weges neben der Straße genau erfassen und dann hoffen, dass komoot oder was auch immer das ordentlich auswerden. Details findest du in den Links am Ende dieses Kommentars.

Bei Fragen dazu kann ich dir die diversen Chatgruppen oder die Community (Forum) ans Herz legen.

Weiter gute Fahrt
silversurfer83

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:smoothness
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Map_Features
leaveAmark (2023-07-06 07:26:02+00:00): Danke dir für die Tipps!

Ja das ist klug, dass das nicht beliebig eingestellt werden soll. Dann ist meine Korrektur aber auch richtig, denn es gibt dort kein Fahrrad-Verboten Schild (Zeichen 254).
berndw (2023-07-08 08:19:03+00:00): Da ich in der Gegend sehr viel erfasst habe, meine Meinung dazu.

Der bemängelte Fußweg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39935090#map=16/50.6596/7.4361&layers=N ist m.M.n. mit hw=path und horse=no korrekt, aber die foot=no und bicycle=yes an der Straße sind IMHO falsch bzw. unnötig.

Wenn komoot hier über den hw=path _ohne_ bicycle=designated routet, muss der Fehler bei denen beseitigt werden und nicht in unserer Datenbank. Die L272 hat an keiner Stelle ein Verbot oder Gebot für Fussgänger und Radfahrer, deswegen gelten hier die Standardwerte, das gilt auch für die auf dem Seitenweg verbotenen Pferde.

Ansonsten gilt, wir mappen nicht für den Renderer oder Router ;-)

Ich bitte dich, das wieder zu korrigieren
leaveAmark (2023-07-08 08:39:23+00:00): Hallo berndw,

ich möchte nochmal betonen, ich habe nur die Zugangsrechte für Rad geändert. Fußgänger und Rad waren vor meiner Korrektur fälschlicherweise auf no und ich habe eben nur die Einstellung für Rad geändert. Das entspricht meines Wissens den Standardwerten, richtig?
Du kannst gerne auch Fußgänger auf yes stellen oder den Abschnitt auf Standard korrigieren, so wie die angrenzenden Abschnitte bereits auch eingestellt sind.

Viele Grüße
Niklas
berndw (2023-07-08 09:04:10+00:00): Habe das mal gemacht, aber vielleicht lag den Problem auch an dem an die Landesstraße gepappten Zaun.
silversurfer83 (2023-07-10 19:24:38+00:00): Alles klar, denke ich :)
Sorry, @leaveAmark, dass ich den Eindruck erweckt habe, dass du da "Mist" gemacht hast. Hab ich nicht genau genug hingeschaut.

happy mapping allerseits
BaboucheVerte (2023-10-09 16:26:38+00:00): It's not service way but reseidential ways ... Can you please stop at Ola's team to map all the residential way as service way ?
ovruni (2023-07-06 06:45:08+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se han agregado algunos edificios sin encuadrar, para esto puede utilizar la letra q
Saludos
Baloo Uriza (2023-07-26 22:51:11+00:00): Please don't move destination:street to destination; they're two different tags.  Also if you're going to tag destination:lanes, please make sure the lanes actually have signed destinations.  They don't in this case.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138172032
A_Prokopova_lyft (2023-07-28 15:01:03+00:00): Hi Baloo Uriza,
While mapping we rely on Minh Nguyen’s proposal, the only complete and detailed page referring destination:lanes tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Minh_Nguyen/destination:street
After researching OSM wiki pages and discussions of the tag in OSM slack channels, we came to the conclusion that at the moment there are no exact requirements or final decision on the use of the destination:street tag or the prohibition of adding street names to the destination tag.
We would appreciate If you could share your insights about the destination:street tag. We would really like to learn more about its usage in order to apply it in the most correct way.

We double-checked our edits and found no errors in applying the destination:lanes tag, all values were added according to the Lyft-owned images (which we can provide if needed).
Could you please provide any detailed explanation of the specific error you identified in the destination:lanes tag and the reasoning behind your decision to remove it? Your insights are crucial to understanding the issue thoroughly, and we highly value the opportunity to address any concerns and improve our mapping efforts collaboratively.

Best regards!
Baloo Uriza (2023-07-29 01:05:32+00:00): When a more specific key is available and the information in it is valid, then that takes precident towards more general tagging schemes.  Please don't iterate backwards.
ovruni (2023-07-06 06:50:26+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto hay múltiples edificios sin encuadrar, incluso algunos con geometrías extrañas, he revertido este conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-01 01:49:03+00:00): DWG revert:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141971666
rskedgell (2023-07-06 08:10:10+00:00): I'm not sure I understand the reason for this edit. Continuity with what?

The Bing Streetside imagery is probably a few years old, but it appears to be a bungalow (building:levels=1) in that.

Was the house number incorrect?
UtterClutter (2023-07-06 20:18:00+00:00): Thanks again for following up and completing with post codes.
user_5359 (2023-07-06 12:41:40+00:00): Welcome tot OSM! If somebody correct your first entry (remove wrong keys, split values, remove unwanted advertising): Don't try to insist on your spelling. Asking why this took place would have been more polite.
Luzandro (2023-07-14 09:37:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3779313
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138173326
user_5359 (2023-07-07 18:36:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please take a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1187774578. What is the mean of the tags
    หมูกระทะ = ท่าบ่อ
    หมูกระทะ&คาเฟ่ = ท่าบ่อ
    หมูกะทะ = ท่าบ่อ
eggie (2023-07-06 07:40:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Probeer het gebied van je edits wat kleiner te houden svp.
Dat maakt controle makkelijker. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
fkv (2023-07-06 10:23:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138181905 where the changeset comment is: Löschung rückgängig, siehe note #3767312
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-12-01 22:24:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175378570 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some pre war Polish names; these do not belong in OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19062
Frans S (2023-08-22 15:25:35+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapping them as 1 building.
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138174855
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-12-01 22:24:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175378570 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some pre war Polish names; these do not belong in OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19062
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-12-01 22:24:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175378570 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some pre war Polish names; these do not belong in OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19062
Rainero (2023-07-10 20:22:43+00:00): Hallo nam0,

willkommen bei OSM! Super, dass du mithilfst die Geodaten zu verbessern.  
Bei diesem Änderungssatz hast du dich vermutlich vom iD-Editor (das ist der im Browser) zu einer Änderung verleiten lassen, die falsch ist. In OSM gibt es highway=footway und highway=cycleway für Fuß- bzw. Radwege, aber keinen speziellen Wert für kombinierte Rad-/Fußwege, daher wird dafür highway=path genommen. Das kannst du natürlich nicht wissen, daher schreibe ich. Der Weg war also vorher schon richtig.  
Es gibt viele Möglichkeiten wie Rad- und Fußwege angelegt und beschildert sind. Zur Orientierung und falls du dich da einarbeiten willst, empfehle ich diese Übersicht: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren

Viel Spaß noch beim Kartieren,
Rainer
nam0 (2023-07-11 05:22:44+00:00): Hallo Rainer, 
vielen Dank für die konstruktive Erläuterung, hab wieder etwas gelernt. Tatsächlich war meine Vorgehensweise und mein Denkfehler genau der, den du oben beschrieben hast.
Gibt es eine einfache Möglichkeit, die Änderung wieder rückgängig zu machen? im Browser Editor wohl nicht habe ich gelesen...

Danke dir
Rainero (2023-07-11 06:44:54+00:00): Hallo nam0,

rückgängig machen geht mit dem Editor JOSM https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/De%3AWikiStart  und dem Reverter-Plugin.  
Ich mache das mal schnell.  

Servus,
Rainer
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-12-01 22:24:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175378570 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some pre war Polish names; these do not belong in OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19062
kubahahaha (2023-08-09 08:45:58+00:00): Ta piekarnia Złoty Kłos gdzieś poleciała
eggie (2023-07-06 10:35:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
enezeg (2023-07-06 14:53:47+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap, le chemin que vous avez créé est un doublon de l'existant https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11029553096#map=19/48.52277/-3.94627&layers=N). Le tag natural:coastline n'a pas de sens ici. Merci de retirer vos modifications et d'utiliser un outil qui serait plus pertinent pour créer des itinéraires liés à des évènements : https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/fr/. Cordialement
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138176134
eggie (2023-07-06 11:08:17+00:00): Dag Auke....  We taggen gewoon conform de verkeersregels. Hoe ongewenst soms ook.
Een C1 bord is vehicle=no en horse=no
Dat geldt dus niet voor voetgangers.
Vaak lopen voetgangers via de berm. Die routeert nu ook niet meer.
Kijk je nog even?
MVG
egie
Auke_ (2023-07-08 12:10:14+00:00): Hey Egie ik heb nog even gekeken en een foto gemaakt. Het gaat hier om een 80km weg. Aan de andere kant van de weg is een dubbel fietspad waar je prima zou kunnen lopen. Maar op dit stuk is het zeer onverantwoord. Er staat een C1 bord en bussen uitgezonderd. op het asfalt staat lijnbussen. Ik neem aan dat je als voetganger uberhaupt niet op 80km wegen mag lopen?
eggie (2023-07-08 12:20:26+00:00): Hoi.. De wet zit wonderlijk in elkaar.

https://www.anwb.nl/experts/juridisch/54/gebruik-wegen

Als er geen alternatief is mag je in de berm lopen.
Theoretisch kan de buurman even een kopje koffie gaan drinken bij z'n buurvrouw.
Die loopt dan door de berm 😀
Daarom ben ik behoudend om wegen op slot te zetten voor voetgangers.
Een betere tag zou kunnen zijn foot=use_sidepath... mits er een alternatief is.
.. foot=no alleen gebruiken bij een echt voetgangersverbod.
Maar up to you.. ik snap je redenatie wel.
Mvg
eggie
Auke_ (2023-07-08 14:33:05+00:00): Ik zie het echt als onderdeel van de N-weg. Die zijn ook echt verboden voor voetgangers dus volgens mij is dit echt ok om foot=no van te maken.... Er is ook een heel goed alternatief als voetganger... dus er is nul noodzaak.