piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tekim (2024-03-30 17:21:39+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149361549
dp7 (2026-06-22 09:03:08+00:00): Ciao cri_cri58
Non c'è nessun sentiero qui https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1267686192 , ne' risultano tracce di passaggio su OSM o sulle heatmaps. Puoi rendere pubblica la traccia originale e fornire qualche dettaglio ? Grazie
tekim (2024-03-30 17:21:11+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149361532
ivanbranco (2024-03-30 15:27:13+00:00): Hi IbrahimTh,

wikimedia_commons=* as a syntax to be followed as wiki
e.g. wikimedia_commons=Wadi Arus should be wikimedia_commons=Category:Wadi Arus ecc.
AssimTh (2024-03-30 19:37:09+00:00): Thank you very much, ivanbranco.
It was my first time using the wikimedia_commons tag.
I have already corrected it, and I will keep it in mind for future occasions.
Greetings
tekim (2024-03-30 17:20:38+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149361506
tekim (2024-03-30 17:20:20+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149361496
Hufkratzer (2024-03-30 21:34:04+00:00): Hi,
die kleine runde Fläche https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1267691547 kann keine Reitanlage/Reiterhof sein. Sieht auf dem Luftbild aus wie der Innenbereich einer Führanlage. Hier habe ich mal eine Führanlage gemappt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1236435065
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-03-30 15:06:06+00:00): 关于这个我觉得有一些需要补充的

虽然不是什么数据source但是或许也可以视作旁侧观察和补充

* https://youth.buu.edu.cn/art/2022/8/21/art_11270_685071.html
* https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA5MTUxMzgzNw==&mid=2650318663&idx=2&sn=d5c54edd2d3442e71ab41f6d807f16d2&chksm=887731c5bf00b8d34e2e2105d57b7a3aa5ae54a02f57135239ddf8ff1a2152c784dc12413995&scene=27
* https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA4OTU2MjAzMA==&mid=2657603764&idx=1&sn=47e36ff57a578acca711531969208e08&chksm=8b8a7e75bcfdf76398f7ed832660082c9f16cb8b911799a7b8f8396274af001e0aedadafe684&scene=27
* https://www.buu.edu.cn/col/col38009/index.html
* https://m.dianping.com/ugcdetail/141263607?sceneType=0&bizType=29&msource=baiduappugc

很遗憾这里面参数一堆，但是确实是这些网址才能看到
这就是中国
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-02 17:36:07+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/871190665/history has si = right that was added in this edit

have you meant sidewalk key ?
DeFra85 (2024-05-02 17:46:50+00:00): Damn, yes 😅
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-09 11:30:17+00:00): I changed it then
highflyer74 (2024-06-13 08:41:43+00:00): Hallo!

Danke für Deinen Beitrag! Bitte beachte, dass Namen in OSM nur für Objekte vergeben werden, die auch wirklich einen Namen haben. Beispielsweise hat ein Mülleimer nicht den Namen "Mülleimer". Dass es sich um einen Mülleimer handelt, ist bereits durch das entsprechende Attribut (in OSM Tag genannt) klar.

Danke, dass Du bei weiteren Bearbeitungen daran denkst :-)

Viele Grüße!
szydzio (2024-03-30 15:55:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15903
szydzio (2024-03-30 15:56:30+00:00): Dzięki za wycofanie wandalizmów , user został już zablokowany.
Pozdr!
szydzio (2024-03-30 16:13:38+00:00): Ale czy name nie powinno wrócić do "Osiedle Wieczorka Pierwsze" ?
Yunkers (2024-03-31 07:13:55+00:00): Powinno. Nie zauważyłem że to też się zmieniło.
hatul (2024-06-02 21:27:19+00:00): מה הסיבה לשינוי השם?
השם הנכון הוא גן לאומי הירקון (אפק-ראש העין) כמו שהיה.
Tsur Halamish (2024-06-03 14:37:57+00:00): השם הוא גן לאומי ירקון. ראה אתר הרט"ג
https://www.parks.org.il/reserve-park/yarkon/
hatul (2024-06-03 14:40:36+00:00): תקרא בבקשה את הדיון פה, הגן הלאומי מחולק לכמה מתחמים.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103563732
rdzik (2024-03-31 18:06:08+00:00): Ulice w Krasiczynie nie mają nazw ewidencyjnych, nazwy potoczne dodajemy do tagu loc_name
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-30 14:40:18+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8760429540

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
literan (2024-03-31 10:11:40+00:00): не могут быть все входы в здание быть главными
sirorezka (2024-03-31 10:50:17+00:00): Спасибо за правку. Прошу прощения, не обратил внимание.
tekim (2024-03-30 17:19:57+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149361483
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-17 01:59:13+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149354941
tekim (2024-03-30 17:19:28+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149361471
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-25 15:12:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600807516/history

are you sure that tidal=yes applies here?
tekim (2024-03-30 17:19:11+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149361461
tekim (2024-03-30 17:18:48+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149361445
tekim (2024-03-30 17:18:30+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149361425
tekim (2024-03-30 17:18:05+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149361399
Глеб (2024-04-03 15:06:58+00:00): С какой целью вы повысили статус этого куска дороги?
tekim (2024-03-30 17:17:46+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149361372
tekim (2024-03-30 17:17:09+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149361345
tekim (2024-03-30 17:16:45+00:00): This is being reverted because it used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149361300
tekim (2024-03-30 17:16:03+00:00): This is being reverted because it used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149361276
Leo Slager (2024-04-15 16:58:48+00:00): Dag QTTT06,
In de ZW hoek van je changeset heb je meerdere routerelaties beschadigd.
Met de editor iD die je gebruikt, is dat vooral als je wegen opknipt het geval.
Als er routerelaties over de wegen lopen dan kun je die beter niet opknippen.
Verder beslaat de changeset een gebied dat veel te groot is. Je loopt het gevaar om ongemerkt nodes of wegen te verplaatsen omdat je met de kaart gaat schuiven terwijl je in de edit-modus bent. Het is beter om een wijziging te uploaden, uit de edit-modus gaan en daarna pas de kaart te verschuiven voor je volgende wijziging.
tekim (2024-03-30 17:15:38+00:00): This is being reverted because it used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149361257
tekim (2024-03-30 17:14:23+00:00): This is being reverted because it used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149361203
luiswoo (2024-04-02 11:40:53+00:00): что эта https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11773775119 точка линии границы забыла на территории нп?
luiswoo (2024-04-02 12:39:10+00:00): вопрос снимается — в кадастре это граница нп...
Mazda05 (2024-04-02 19:07:36+00:00): Вероятно, самозахват и самозастрой территории на границе и за границей в 1991-1995 годах. Корректность расположения точки +-5 метров
tekim (2024-03-30 17:13:56+00:00): This is being reverted because it used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149361181
tekim (2024-03-30 16:18:58+00:00): This is being reverted because it used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149358742
tekim (2024-03-30 16:17:27+00:00): Hello, Thaks for your edits to the map.  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Maps when editing OpenStreetMap due to Google's terms of use.  Also, you seem to be deleting nodes and replacing them with another only a few meters away.  You should instead modify the existing node as this preserves the history of the object.  Finally, moving a node that represents a business by only a few meters when the business takes up a relatively large area really doesn't add much value.
tekim (2024-03-30 16:18:17+00:00): This is being reverted because it used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149358709
Emilius123 (2024-04-28 17:21:17+00:00): Arkadiko lässt grüßen.
tekim (2024-03-30 16:23:37+00:00): Hello, Thanks for your edit to the map!  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Maps when editing OSM due to Google's terms of use.
tekim (2024-03-30 16:24:22+00:00): This is being reverted because it used a source that is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149359010
danieldegroot2 (2024-03-30 17:25:16+00:00): Hey DaCor,

Try to describe changes, please. I.e.
'Corrected tagging for pharmacy'
tells other mappers more than 'fix'.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Also, I would recommend checking your changes with the official website for each POI and discussing it with other mappers -at least where you are not sure- (as the change is not just fixing an obvious typo; these two tags should not be confused with each other). If possible, submit improvements to NSI for larger brands (open an issue ticket)
https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index
(such as Superdrug)
and additional terms/translations to iD so a tag is more easily found
https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema
(See 'Translate!' link for translations)

Regards,

Daniel
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-30 16:30:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Generała Maczka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11773828984
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11773828985
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11773828986
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11773828987

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
muralito (2024-03-31 12:43:33+00:00): Hola. Cuando etiquetes velocidades maximas en casos donde hay opciones cercanas de alternativas para rutear (como acá que podria ser Mario Ferreira), si etiquetas una sola muchas veces se da un problema relativo entre ambas, al no tener la otra la velociadad etiquetada, toma cada ruteador lo que tiene como predeterminado, y probablemente termine ruteando por donde no sea la mejor opcion.
UYMapper (2024-04-18 01:23:51+00:00): Ah, no sabía que podía darse esa complicación.
Yo pasé por allí, ví el cartel de vel. max. y aproveché a agregarlo ya que faltaba ese dato.
No estaba mapeando las velocidades de todas las calles de la zona.
tekim (2024-03-30 17:13:13+00:00): This is being reverted because it used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149361158
VLD549 (2024-05-16 07:26:45+00:00): Hi, it seems that Rackésmillen has more to offer than only hotel, it has a mill, restaurant, etc.
Also, the site mentions 'herberg' and 'hostel'.
Is it something we should take into consideration?

Thank you!
RDE FUN (2024-03-31 02:18:56+00:00): google maps shows that theres no foley ave
tekim (2024-03-31 13:34:12+00:00): Sorry if I didn't provide enough explanation.  We are not allowed to use Google Maps when editing OpenStreetMap due to Google's terms of use.
RDE FUN (2024-03-31 18:54:56+00:00): ohhh ok
RDE FUN (2024-03-31 19:15:48+00:00): but when i look at satellite images i dont see foley
tekim (2024-03-31 20:35:12+00:00): The issue isn't whether this edit reflects reality or not, nor whether you can find a source with an OSM-compatible license that supports the edit, but rather whether or not this edit violated the Google Maps terms of use by using it to improve OSM.
Rashid86 (2024-04-18 21:39:42+00:00): Это что такое? Почему полигон аулов превращаете в границу/отношение и привязываете к отдалённым зимовкам?
Ведь Зимовки привязываются к сельским округам, но, не к аулу
Noro Hibu (2024-04-18 23:05:12+00:00): Здравствуйте. Объясню свою позицию: я основываюсь на данных из КАТО (классификатор административно-территориальных объектов) и законах Республики Казахстан (РК). Согласно закону РК от 8 декабря 1993 года № 2572-XII	Об административно-территориальном устройстве Республики Казахстан, "3. Населенный пункт – это часть компактно заселенной территории Республики Казахстан, сложившаяся в результате хозяйственной и иной общественной деятельности граждан, с численностью населения не менее 50 человек, учтенная и зарегистрированная в установленном законами Республики Казахстан порядке и управляемая местными представительными и исполнительными органами. Крестьянские и иные поселения с численностью населения менее 50 человек включаются в состав ближайшего населенного пункта." То есть по факту крестьянские и иные поселения (сюда же и как вы назвали "зимовки") менее 50 человек являются частью какого-то населённого пункта (НП). Если посмотрите законы, то, действительно, когда численность НП падает ниже 50, его упраздняют и включают в состав другого НП. Отсюда и единый мультиполигон с границами главного НП (на нём точка с place=hamlet|village|town|city согласно общим правилам) и границы входящих в его состав поселений. На самих поселениях точка с тегом place=neibourhoud (данный тег лучше подходит для этих целей, так как обозначает часть сельских и небольших НП, в то время как suburb больше подходит для городских НП). Откуда я беру данные что частью чего является? В КАТО для этого есть предусмотренная классификация (можете почитать как устроен КАТО), плюс в законах РК прописывается, например, при упразднении НП частью какого другого НП он стал.
Noro Hibu (2024-04-18 23:06:30+00:00): Данная схема хорошо отображает особенности административно-территориального деления РК.
Rashid86 (2024-04-30 21:09:34+00:00): Спасибо, за уточнение!
limes11 (2024-03-31 10:43:53+00:00): Hi, 

bitte beachten, NSGs sind type=boundary, nicht multipolyon.

Viele Grüße
Romwriter (2024-03-31 20:10:12+00:00): erledigt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149406717
Ropino (2024-05-06 11:43:02+00:00): Hi,
Du hast die Kölner Straße zwischen Kapellenstraße und Lefarthstraße gelöscht. Existiert die dort nicht mehr? Oder wird dort gebaut o.ä.?
johannes_kw (2024-05-07 07:00:19+00:00): Hi,
das war ein von mir nicht bemerktes Versehen. An der Kölner Straße hat sich nichts verändert. Ich hatte versucht die Fehlermeldung "Straßenbahngleis kreuzt Lefarthstraße" bzw. Kapellenstraße zu korrigieren. Da die beiden Straßen sowie die meisten anderen hier in die Kölner Straße münden und gar nichts "gekreuzt" wird. 
Kannst du den ursprünglichen Zustand wiederherstellen oder soll ich das zurückbasteln.
Ropino (2024-05-07 08:47:15+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung.
Ich habe mit:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150998128
einen Teil deiner Änderungen revertet.
Jetzt sollte die Kölner Str. wieder durchgehend sein.
VG
VictorIE (2024-03-31 12:47:48+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1267724560

Driveways like this can be marked
highway=service
service=driveway
access=private
surface=asphalt

Make sure that all highways are joined up like here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1267724710
Szymson (2024-03-30 17:36:20+00:00): Literalnie przesunąłeś punkt o 2 metry a i tak jeszcze nie trafiłeś w granicę działki z Geoportalu...
Famlam (2024-03-30 21:41:01+00:00): Ik denk dat er hier iets mis gaat. Er staan nu drie hekken op exact dezelfde  locatie:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11773930823
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11773930822
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2636925880
ika-chan! (2024-05-06 00:02:20+00:00): You are requested to cease adding imaginary rallies, and to no longer split highways separated only by a hatched area. Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway .
empty_child (2024-04-07 21:31:10+00:00): Hello N1k4,
Your changeset was fully reverted due to the bad quality (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149710548)
mavl (2024-11-13 07:58:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159079753 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-04-05 14:43:13+00:00): Santanaloba53, 
please remove all population data that you have wrongly added in all your changesets
tekim (2024-03-31 00:43:45+00:00): Hello, Thanks for your edits to the map! Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Maps when editing OpenStreetMap due to Google's terms of use.
tekim (2024-03-31 00:44:09+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149373131
tekim (2024-03-31 00:41:30+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM).  It is great to have you as part of our community!  Thanks for your edits to the map.  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Earth when editing OSM due to Google's terms of use. Doing so could endanger the entire project.  I look forward to seeing other edits from you (using acceptable sources of course).
tekim (2024-03-31 00:41:57+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149373094
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-03-31 19:12:21+00:00): Hi and welcome, you probably wanted to use ditches instead of canals
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-27 03:30:08+00:00): mueschel, please stop destroying any and all rare tags - and please read osm.wiki/Any_tags_you_like - what you are doing has zero value. Cleaning up malformed values and keys has some small value, purging all rare is just damage
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-27 03:31:01+00:00): moving rare key to description is just chasing some stupid statistics and more damaging than helpful

please cease that pointless, damaging, annoying and frankly stupid activity
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-27 03:34:45+00:00): And I remember you doing the same type of damage earlier. Please cease it and never ever resume doing this.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-27 04:15:03+00:00): Also: I would be appropriate for you to go through all your edits ever made and revert all that did similar damage before doing any remote editing

but I admit that I am not really hoping for it, just ceasing new damage would be good enough

please make a changeset comment here promising to stop at least this specific form of damage
mueschel (2026-05-27 05:12:05+00:00): Sorry, but in this two year old edit I have to disagree - that's not a key, this is half a sentence that clearly is something that is part of a description
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-29 09:22:00+00:00): So, as I understand you plan to continue destroying ATYL keys without communication attempts?

Please reread https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like and stop damaging data

> that's not a key

it is a key, even if it would be useless and stupid it is by definition key in a tag
mueschel (2026-05-29 10:34:49+00:00): ATYL doesn't mean "put any text you like in the 'key' field". Otherwise we can get rid of any "description" or "note" tag and just put the full text into a new key.

The possible tags you proposed in the related forum thread for this feature recently are proper tags and fully fine according to the ATYL and general key style rules.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-29 11:32:40+00:00): ATYL in fact means that weird keys like this one are fine, and that removing them for sake of removal is bad

abaaandoned:highway= is worth fixing as data is preserved, purging weird-single-use keys is bad and unwanted and damaging
mueschel (2026-05-29 12:42:55+00:00): The information was still there, and even in a way that is much more visible to the casual mapper: iD will display it directly and doesn't hide it in a closed tab that most mappers will never touch. 

Can we just agree on a proper tag for this property (you suggested several) and move on?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-08 19:22:09+00:00): key I used is 100% fine and I see no reason to change or damage it
TheDutchMan13 (2024-03-31 00:35:17+00:00): Don't forget to add comments to your change set so everyone knows what's been edited.
cityofgod (2024-10-12 08:22:51+00:00): Hi, it looks like you gave the house the name "House". Normally houses don't have this tag. Is this a LINZ data import error, or what happened here?
Prosperosity (2024-10-12 09:00:38+00:00): This is because the title was imported from Wikidata when I added the Wikidata ID:

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q77980366

The building is a heritage listed building, but the name listed by Heritage NZ is literally just "House".

https://www.heritage.org.nz/list-details/2174/2174

Often if Heritage NZ does additional research, they'll add a more specific name for a feature that they've given a generic name. Hopefully that happens one day for this.
Metzor (2024-04-01 06:39:18+00:00): Hallo lille2000,

Brouter Suspects hat mich auf deinen Änderungssatz aufmerksam gemacht.
Vermutlich sollte das Einbahnstraßentag nur für den Kreuzungsbereich gelten?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/863618559/history#map=16/48.6097/9.2694&layers=N

Ich habe das jedenfalls so geändert:
https://osmcha.org/changesets/149417853

Viele Grüße
Metzor
citrula (2024-03-30 20:09:04+00:00): Please make sure you are selecting the appropriate POI type when you are contributing - unless this is actually an artwork of some sort it should not be marked as such
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149364908
Emilius123 (2024-03-30 20:48:56+00:00): Du bist cool, freshe Änderungen, aber ich bin cooler und meine Änderungen sind fresher.
NeisBot (2024-04-02 14:04:04+00:00): Hello kamen1, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Paul Berry (2024-03-31 07:57:54+00:00): Seem to have found a bug in StreetComplete.
Elbuenotaco (2025-11-14 02:00:30+00:00): Mosrone
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2025-11-14 19:10:54+00:00): Transfered uir_adr to cuzk:ruian, their ref should be same. Note that houses have conscription number and recreation houses and garages provisional number (both kind is building house number, building can have only conscription or provisional number, not both) related to district of municipality, and on some places with street names is addited street number related to street, which is for using OSM data real housenumber with street name.
divaddivag (2024-04-17 12:28:11+00:00): Bonjour, je viens de retirer le bicycle=no du sentier à Guéron. Le tag bicycle=* décrit la légalité pour les cyclistes et n'est pas associé à une pratique en particulier. Si votre GPS/routeur vous fait passer par ce sentier alors qu'il ne devrait pas, c'est lui le coupable car OSM est à jour. Merci pour vos efforts pour préciser la nature de vos contributions. David
aceman444 (2025-08-18 20:31:01+00:00): Zdravim, to addr:country=SK nemusite vymazavat, importujeme to z registra adries aj s tym.
t_ja (2025-08-19 06:32:46+00:00): Ahoj Ace,
addr:country=SK je uplne zbytocny tag este z doby, ked neexistovalo Overpass API.

Ak sa ti chce, mozes presvedcit Dodka, aby ho uz nepridaval pri spracovani dat z RA a taktiez sa moze plosne vymazat z OSM.

T.
aceman444 (2025-08-19 15:20:47+00:00): Neviem ako  to suvisi s Overpass, ale ak su vsetky slovenske adresy na uzemi Slovenska a hranicu Slovenska mame v OSM spravne, tak asi nie je potrebny. Ja len aby sme tie adresy mali vsade konzistentne. Ak Dodka presvedcite aby to negeneroval, nemam s tym problem. Dakujem