piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Maloss34 (2023-10-09 22:57:48+00:00): caro amico, innanzitutto quale prova ha fornitoo il signor Andrea Del Sarto per asserire che non sono ufficiali. Peraltro Lo stesso signore  Andrea Del Sarto ha cancellato tutti i nomi dei sentieri che in questi anni i mappatore avevano inserito nella zona fra questi un sentiero molto famoso chiamato il "sentiero della memoria" in ricordo dell'attività partigiana luogo di commorazione Pubblica e questo aprirò un'altra segnalazione, come quella del sentiero anch'esso cancellato chiamato frangifuoco poichè posto a difesa della zona boschiva sentiero così chiamato dagli Enti che lo hanno costruito
Maloss34 (2023-10-09 23:03:10+00:00): tornando hai sentieri in questione voglio ravvisare che stiamo procedendo, non senza fatica, a mappare e segnalare tutti i sentieri della zona nell'ambito del progetto ATA patrocinato e sovvenzionato dal Comune di Ascoli Piceno (Ente Pubblico deputato per competenza alla toponomastica) https://www.ascolitrailarea.it/   e https://www.comune.ap.it/home unito ad un altro progetto finanziato dalla Regione Marche
Maloss34 (2023-10-09 23:07:49+00:00): Sono già stati inseriti 200 paletti di  segnalazione anelli e sentieri ma dobbiamo lottare contro i vandali che li rimuovono e contro chi cancella i nomi dei sentieri dalle mappe inseriti non da noi anche per i sentieri CAI  (il sentiero della memoria è un caso)  Club Alpino Italiano  che è un Ente di diritto pubblico nome riportato anche nelle didascalie delle loro mappe
Maloss34 (2023-10-09 23:12:06+00:00): tornando ai sentieri come ASSO si evidenzia come non siano nomi di fantasia ma corrispondono al temine con cui vengono identificati. Il signor  Andrea Del Sarto prima di cancellare i nomi di tutti i sentieri della zona avrebbe dovuto contattare i mappatori che in questi anni hanno identificato i sentieri con i nomi comunemente utilizzati. Ma ha preferito cancellare non avvertendo e non fornendo alcuna prova dell'ipotetico abuso.
Maloss34 (2023-10-09 23:15:44+00:00): comunque tornando ai sentieri non so come inviare le voto che ho recuperato per dimostrare che esistono spero che il signor Andrea Del Sarto fornisca prova della loro inesistenza. Comunque ho rintracciato dei video su youtube dove si vedono in segnali ed i nomi dell'ASSO e TNT
Maloss34 (2023-10-09 23:20:46+00:00): Asso 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPGKsXMZugM&t=8s
al minuto 0:07 sulla destra si vede un paletto segnaletico con scritto il nome del sentiero

https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=Z8VZ9CK85hw
al minuto 3:58 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgp7XcQhO2M
al minuto 0:14
Maloss34 (2023-10-10 05:07:44+00:00): E' l'associazione ATA di cui faccio parte che ha il ruolo di segnalare i sentieri
Maloss34 (2023-10-10 05:12:28+00:00):  Ho notato che l’utente Andrea Del Sarto senza dare motivazione o comunicazione o avvertire coloro che hanno inserito i sentieri ed i nomi dei sentieri ha cancellato molti altri sentieri. Fra questi anche quelli del CAI https://www.cai.it/ Ente di diritto Nazionale. Fra questi il “sentiero della memoria” intitolato così in ricordo dell’attività partigiana e luogo di commemorazione https://www.cronachepicene.it/2023/10/07/il-sentiero-della-memoria-da-colle-san-marco-a-colle-san-giacomo-sulle-orme-dei-partigiani/424356/ . Vi manderò le modifiche fatte da Andrea Del Sarto che senza continua a cancellare i sentieri. Inoltre ha cancellato il nome di un altro sentiero “frangifuoco” così definito dalle Autorità Statali perchè è a difesa del fuoco nella zona boschiva. Per quanto riguarda l’asso bastava consultare internet per scoprire che non è un nome di fantasia ma corrisponde ad un sentiero molto famoso e conosciuto da tutti i bikers ma il signor Andrea Del Sarto ha preferito cancellare tutti i sentieri nominati in questi anni non solo da me. Poi se occorre precisare qualche dato siamo comunque disponibili. Ma il signor Andrea Del Sarto non scrive, non commenta, non avverte ma CANCELLA e basta. Solo per asso :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPGKsXMZugM&t=8s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=Z8VZ9CK85hw

per altro identificare i sentieri con un nome locale comunemente conosciuto da tutti è una condizione di sicurezza ed immediato intervento in caso di incidente come recentemente successo. https://www.corrieredelconero.it/cronaca/notizie-dal-mondo/ascoli-piceno-ciclista-cade-e-sinfortuna-lungo-il-sentiero-dellasso/?p=44459/

Grazie al signor Andrea Del Sarto questo non sarà possibile

vorrei mandare altre foto ma non so come fare per questo ho anche risposto all’email inviata

Sui sentieri sono stati inseriti circa 200 paletti con segnalazione e codice QR per accedere ad internet e verificare anelli e sentieri.

Si è scelta questa forma per arginare le azioni di vandalismo che sono molto frequenti nella zona; comunque l’associazione ATA convenzionata con il Comune di Ascoli Piceno è disponibile a fornire dichiarazioni in merito al o ai nomi dei sentieri ricompresi nel progetto ATA la cui segnaletica è ancora da implementare in quanto la cartellonistica è ancora in fase di ultimazione (sono stati inseriti circa 200 paletti per la segnalazione dei sentieri dove si è preferito inserire, come già detto, il codice QR dell’anello con i sentieri… nella pagian FB se ne vedono alcuni

https://www.facebook.com/p/Ascoli-Trail-Area-100040848447043/

Si tratta di un progetto convenzionato e sovvenzionato da Autorità Pubbliche con il fine di valorizzare ed indentificare la sentieristica locale.

Purtroppo dobbiamo lottare contro i vandali che tolgono la segnaletica e contro coloro che cancellano i nomi sulle mappe senza avvertire nessuno.

Sarebbe auspicabile una maggior collaborazione da parte di tutti…

Ripeto sono stati cancellati moltissimi sentieri inseriti durante gli anni (non da me) fra cui alcuni presenti sulle mappe CAI

https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Club_Alpino_Italiano
pantufla (2024-10-10 19:01:57+00:00): Esto qué es? Chocolatico?
Adrian Sameli (2024-10-24 07:37:57+00:00): Se trata de una tienda y restaurante que vende y sirve chocolate y tiene unas magníficas vistas al valle.
pantufla (2024-10-24 09:07:28+00:00): Gracias por contestar y colaborar, lo terminé de clasificar un poco mejor https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158286953
maciek-szn (2023-10-01 20:44:03+00:00): „Objazd do dworca PKP” to nie jest nazwa tej drogi, proszę jej tak nie nazywać.
JP2GMD (2023-10-01 21:00:11+00:00): Powinna zostać zaliczona do Stacyjnej? Nie ma żadnego innego znaku poza tym, a powstała ona, z tego co wiem w wyniku przebudowy dworca
maciek-szn (2023-10-04 07:17:59+00:00): Nie, po prostu jest to droga bez nazwy.
DankJae (2023-10-12 09:49:26+00:00): The speed limit for the Island Green car park is 10 mph, as it is private land and signposted as such. Just noticed you removed all the lower speed limits I added for the default assumption.
eggie (2023-10-01 19:55:19+00:00): commentaar moet zijn:  witruimte verwijderd
clay_c (2023-10-01 20:20:17+00:00): Oops, this should have been under my personal account
SomeoneElse (2023-10-01 20:08:20+00:00): Re https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12307853 , I've walked or drive most of it and have never seen a sign, hence "name:signed=no".
clay_c (2023-10-01 20:20:20+00:00): Oops, this should have been under my personal account
clay_c (2023-10-01 20:20:23+00:00): Oops, this should have been under my personal account
clay_c (2023-10-01 20:20:25+00:00): Oops, this should have been under my personal account
clay_c (2023-10-01 20:20:27+00:00): Oops, this should have been under my personal account
clay_c (2023-10-01 20:20:29+00:00): Oops, this should have been under my personal account
clay_c (2023-10-01 20:20:31+00:00): Oops, this should have been under my personal account
citrula (2023-10-02 16:45:18+00:00): hi, it looks like you accidentally dragged a hedge out of place near Wendy's. Can you fix it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142003212
clay_c (2023-10-01 20:20:48+00:00): Oops, this should have been under my personal account
clay_c (2023-10-01 20:20:51+00:00): Oops, this should have been under my personal account
clay_c (2023-10-01 20:20:54+00:00): Oops, this should have been under my personal account
clay_c (2023-10-01 20:20:57+00:00): Oops, this should have been under my personal account
clay_c (2023-10-01 20:20:58+00:00): Oops, this should have been under my personal account
clay_c (2023-10-01 20:21:00+00:00): Oops, this should have been under my personal account
clay_c (2023-10-01 20:21:02+00:00): Oops, this should have been under my personal account
DaanLT (2023-10-02 04:24:00+00:00): Sveiki, gal reikia pagalbos su ženklinimu, nes darot daug neaiškių/neteisingų pakeitimų ?
citrula (2023-10-05 22:45:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You can press "Q" with an object selected in iD to square the corners. Please do this when you are mapping buildings.

Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142003753
Crsi (2023-10-01 21:10:52+00:00): Hello notzfc,
are you sure there is a disused railway there? I'm pretty confident that there is no such railway. Could you please clarify your source?
Kind regards, Crsi
notzfc (2023-10-01 21:18:04+00:00): Hi, the other day I was driven by by train (very slowly as it had just had decellerated for the 40 km/h switch shy north) and saw the track laying in the facility
Crsi (2023-10-01 21:32:58+00:00): I see, thanks for the quick response. But I think there was never a railway track before, so the 'disused' key is not quite appropriate.
According to the wiki:
"A section of railway which is no longer used but where the track and infrastructure remain in place."

Did you just see the railway's tracks (the metal bars) lying around, then I would vote for removing this way entirely.
jmsbert (2023-11-30 23:27:50+00:00): Hello Idkwhattoputhere,
welcome to OSM;
while uploading your edits you checked the box to as for a feedback. You can easily see a visualisation of your edits here: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142003770/.
Here's my feedback:
You added a highway as "highway=footway" here. The tag "footway" in OSM has a very specific meaning, implying that only pedestrians are allowed to use this way. While remote mapping it is better to use general tag. In this case a "highway=service" and "service=driveway" would be the right choice. Also do not connect highways to building contures - and remember that buildings have normally right angled corners - press "q" key in the editor when the object is selected.
Keep on mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142003770
aixbrick (2023-10-01 20:26:19+00:00): Zu schnell geklickt und Kommentar/Quelle vergessen :-(. Kommentar: verschiedene Korrekturen und Ergänzungen (z.T. Osmose)
Quelle: NRW Orthophoto + Mapillary
jmsbert (2023-12-03 13:12:13+00:00): Hello Idkwhattoputhere,
thanks for contributing and supporting this project by your mapping.
In this project I came across area of "landuse=forest" here. Even though the chosen tag is correct, it is more likely that it just "natural=wood" - meaning no active utilisation takes place. Anyways I can not recommend to map features like this in projects like this one. The reason is that you are requested to stay with your mapping within the area of the task. Very often it happens that landuses go far beyond the task area. The result of mapping these features is an odd shaped area - and as it is usually not the task to map these features the neighbor contributor does not continue mapping the area. Therefore I cannot recommend mapping these features within these projects.
Anyway, keep on mapping and contributing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142004456
jmsbert (2023-12-03 01:07:53+00:00): Hello dumbinom,
thanks for contributing and supporting this project by your mapping.
You mapped and area of "natural=grassland here. Even though the chosen tag could be correct, I can not recommend to map features like this in projects like this one. The reason is that you are requested to stay with your mapping within the area of the task. In case of landuses that go beyond the task area the result of mapping these is that an odd shaped area results - and as it is usually not the task to map these features the neighbor contributor does not continue mapping the area. Therefore I cannot recommend mapping these features within these projects.
I am doing currently a kind of 3rd pass validation for the project - I have decided to remove the area as there is not certainty about the actual type of landuse (could e.g. also be a meadow).
Anyways, keep on mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142004945
YomanNH (2023-10-06 09:51:00+00:00): Ciąg pieszo-rowerowy to highway=path. I mam nadzieję, że sprawdziłeś, że to już jest otwarte, bo to, że "asfalt jest" o niczym nie świadczy.
SafetyIng (2023-10-02 15:05:42+00:00): Hallo Radler59, 
ich hätte die Bitte, in Zukunft auf so große Änderungssätze zu verzichten. Kannst du sie vielleicht örtlich passender "kleiner" portionieren?
Danke dafür!
Grüße
SafetyIng
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142005026
jb54osm (2023-10-02 11:12:03+00:00): Dag Guus,

Er bestaat al een 'officiële' adresnode Schedeldoekshaven 506. Ik heb jouw gegevens daar naar toe gekopieerd, en de dubbele node verwijderd.
ghosm (2023-10-02 11:24:55+00:00): Excuus! En wat goed gezien. Bedankt voor het fixen!
Colin Smale (2023-10-02 18:56:45+00:00): These counties are no longer used for administrative purposes and you should not be retagging them to boundary=administrative! Please revert them to boundary=historic.
ramthelinefeed (2023-10-02 19:09:20+00:00): Well, I'm not sure I agree. Those counties *are* still used for Lord Lieutenancy areas, which *do* have an (albeit rather small) administrative purpose. 
I wondered whether it might be wiser to duplicate the relations for Armagh, Antrim, Fermanagh & Tyrone, and have one as the 'historic' version, and the other as the 'Lieutenancy Area', but that seems to be splitting hairs and would make much practical difference?
Colin Smale (2023-10-02 19:21:23+00:00): What is their (small) administrative function? Are they different to the Lieutenancy areas in GB, which are basically the "historic counties" and tagged as such? Not every boundary defined in law is an administrative boundary. In OSM there is usually a check that it has some kind of democratic constitution ("has an elected council"). If you want to diverge from the established tagging scheme in this way it might be better to ask the community first.
Having two sets of admin boundaries at admin_level=6 is also asking for confusion.
Colin Smale (2023-10-02 19:32:43+00:00): Cancel that last sentence - I see that the NI councils have been set to admin_level=7, undocumented in the wiki. So much for consistency!
ramthelinefeed (2023-10-02 19:45:11+00:00): Yes we have been discussing the choice of admin-level for NI supercouncils here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/northern-ireland-super-council-boundaries/99280 
The administrative powers of local governement in NI is *not* 'consistent' with that in GB - the demarcation between Westminster, Stormont and local councils has notable differences to other parts of the UK...
ramthelinefeed (2023-10-02 19:47:47+00:00): I take your point about consistency of tagging between NI lieutenancy areas & GB ones.   Lieutenancy areas do not have 'some kind of democratic consititution', they instead have a lord lieutenant *appointed* by the monarch :) 
The main things they do are administer the honours system, supply dignitaries to preside over citizenship ceremonies, and attend gala luncheons ;)
richlv (2023-10-02 13:45:29+00:00): Hi, thank you for the map improvements.
In this changeset, a restaurant was added that was already mapped. As you have added it with maps.me, it seems likely that data there is outdated.

You might want to try Organic Maps app, which is a fork of maps.me that receives more frequent map updates.
47NOE (2023-10-02 07:21:37+00:00): merci de bien vouloir faire un revert de cette modification qui ne représente pas le réalité du terrain. je me suis personnellement déplacé le 29/09/2023 pour vérifier et corriger les notes 3496575, 3496573 et 3496612. Attention aux erreurs ou approximations du cadastre. le Gué aux Moines n'existe pas. Le panneau Petit Bois se trouve juste devant cette propriété et non à l'endroit que vous indiquez qui correspond à la position du cadastre.
felipeeugenio (2023-10-01 23:46:51+00:00): Hola Javier.
perdona, pero está en construcción? todo lo que veo en internet es que están pensando hacerla.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142005882
Frans S (2023-10-04 09:21:43+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please solve the issues reported by the issue triangle before uploading your work.
Improve your knowledge about mapping and tagging of roads.
Traces inbetween farm land are no unclassified highways, but tracks. 
Focus on through going roads connecting houses, settlements , villages etc.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Morocco#How_tagging_the_routes/ways?
general wiki highways:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries
best regards
watmildon (2025-01-31 04:12:53+00:00): Hello! I would love to know if you have some tech for adding population info. The data in the US desperately needs a refresh and I could start from scratch but perhaps you have some tech I could crib off of.

Thanks!
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-03 06:21:52+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142081936
eteb3 (2023-10-02 10:40:02+00:00): Occupation Rd, not Corporation Rd
GPar (2023-12-07 19:31:38+00:00): "aeroway=building" doesn't exist!
Please check guide:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway
aTarom (2023-10-02 06:15:17+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, puedes revisar este tag
"osak:identifier"="5555"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11232676882/history
parece que solo se usa en direcciones de Dinamarca
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:osak:identifier?uselang=en
Saludos
Anónimo785612 (2023-10-02 07:57:11+00:00): Me equivoqué, gracias.
GovernorKeagan (2023-11-30 16:47:51+00:00): The 75 has been replaced: https://www.transportforireland.ie/news/eight-new-bus-routes-launch-as-part-of-phase-5b-of-busconnects-dublin/
luiswoo (2023-10-01 23:34:23+00:00): уёбище тупое
user_17222985 (2023-11-03 06:45:54+00:00): on which basis the Romanian name was replaced by the Russian language

I am interested in whether you saw it in person during your visit, or saw the photo on the Internet, for example, in a message to a local Telegram channel, on Facebook or somewhere else
It's just that if it's your personal fantasy, then it's not verified information and you need to cancel the edit.
Understand that in territories where there are several official languages, the principle on the ground must be followed
If there is a sign on the sports field with a Russian name - all questions disappear - let there be Russian language. If the sports ground does not have a name plate, it is better to keep the name in the language in which it was originally mapped. Only local cartographers should change the language.
           Since you are a cartographer from Germany, you do not need to interfere in sensitive topics. Understand that in countries where there are several official languages / and in the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic (PMR) there are 3 official languages / - the question of which language to map is a delicate sensitive  topic .
Maturi0n (2023-11-03 10:40:07+00:00): I did not replace the Romanian name. I only moved it to name:ro and put the Russian name into name:ru. The reason for this is, that the location is marked to be within the borders of the PMR and we need consistency. The local community in the PMR decided a long time ago to use Russian in the main name tag. OSM has the principle to follow what "is used on the ground", regardless of politics. And in the PMR, Russian is really the main language on the ground. I'm not in any way against the Romanian language. In fact, it was actually me who added Romanian names throughout the PMR. I think ~ 70% of all Romanian names (in name:ro) in the PMR were added by me alone. 

Although I'm located in Germany, I've been to the region many times and have a strong interest in Moldova (and the PMR).
Tomas_J (2023-10-05 21:57:10+00:00): Ahoj,
podla ortofoto to skor vyzera na oznacenie casti potoka pod cestou ako tunnel=culvert a layer=-1 a z cesty by som layer a bridge vymazal...
Tomas
xem0861 (2023-10-03 01:37:03+00:00): Is this a new thing that route relations can only have numeric info in it?
clay_c (2023-10-03 12:48:17+00:00): No, it's been a thing for years. In route relations, ref=* should only contain the text displayed on the sign, without any extra prefixes like the ones we use on ways.
clay_c (2023-10-03 19:38:56+00:00): Now that the tiles have been updated, I can share this: https://zelonewolf.github.io/openstreetmap-americana/#map=12.55/41.68593/-88.88492

This renderer uses the network and ref values of route relations to determine which shield icon to use, and what text goes inside. Prior to this change, the ref values were too long to fit inside a pentagon.
gscholz (2023-10-05 08:20:33+00:00): Hi TVermeer,
your recent changesets have left behind errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-8.16093&lat=37.20481&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=142011161

This kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly n the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
topolusitania (2023-10-05 11:51:28+00:00): Corrected.
gscholz (2023-10-05 12:19:30+00:00): Thanks for your quick response.
Guido
citrula (2023-10-03 00:24:22+00:00): highway=path implies that they are foot access only unless there are additional access tags. You should connect them to the road if they are accessible from the road on foot.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142011164
gscholz (2023-10-05 08:20:22+00:00): Hi TVermeer,
your recent changesets have left behind errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-8.16093&lat=37.20481&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=142011426

This kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly n the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
fawkes2 (2023-10-02 07:10:05+00:00): This is vandalism
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142012636
jeslop (2023-10-02 12:58:26+00:00): Reverted on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142038334

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
M!dgard (2023-10-02 00:49:27+00:00): I also made some more manual changes in JOSM, mainly to improve the comments entered in the On Wheels app, they were often describing POI type.
M!dgard (2023-10-02 00:50:33+00:00): These are the nodes that were flagged by my script because they have been modified after the event. My script did not modify anything on these nodes:

https://osm.org/node/3066438241

https://osm.org/node/5619008156

https://osm.org/node/9749066892

https://osm.org/node/10047215294
M!dgard (2023-10-02 00:51:15+00:00): The following were flagged because they were created during the event. (Also not modified by my script):

https://osm.org/node/11212321789

https://osm.org/node/11212323492

https://osm.org/node/11212347803

https://osm.org/node/11212390320

https://osm.org/node/11212393875

https://osm.org/node/11212443588

https://osm.org/node/11212448672

https://osm.org/node/11212500511

https://osm.org/node/11212520889

https://osm.org/node/11215236818
M!dgard (2023-10-02 00:52:05+00:00): These nodes will be fixed manually in subsequent changesets by the local community.