piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Leo Slager (2024-07-13 19:49:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
LudovicG (2024-08-08 13:55:47+00:00): Bonjour,
Je crois qu'il y a un chiffre de trop dans le numéro de téléphone (du Strapontin) ;-)
Thierry574 (2024-10-11 21:56:30+00:00): Désolé pour la lenteur de ma réponse, c'est corrigé, merci ! :D
aharvey (2025-11-07 04:11:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4971581 says there's no barrier where you added one, but no photo, so might need another survey....
❤️‍🔥 (2025-11-07 07:49:17+00:00): feel free to delete it, I would trust the note over old my edits, this area was still in the midst of a construction zone back then. 

construction finished in March 2025 https://www.timeout.com/sydney/news/a-stunning-new-three-kilometre-walking-track-has-just-opened-in-sydney-031725
HellMap (2024-07-13 15:50:35+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Я восстановил точку, но изменил ее на магазин одежды, основываясь на фотографии.

Я так понимаю, что LB здесь вообще больше нет?
LockOnGuy (2024-07-13 11:31:38+00:00): Hi Rawad123, Please add good changeset comment next time. Uploading changeset without changeset comment is wasting other mappers time who try to understand what you did, so please next time add one. Thank you.    
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Dimitalk (2024-07-13 11:36:55+00:00): https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61550894709457&sk=about
Dimitalk (2024-07-13 11:37:24+00:00): https://www.instagram.com/artzentina.music.bar/
SomeoneElse (2024-07-13 11:57:48+00:00): Hello "cybermapper" please do use meaningful changeset comments.  "update" doesn't really help anyone understand what you are doing.
maro21 (2024-07-13 13:59:41+00:00): Thanks a lot for resolving all those fixmes!
keepright! ler (2024-07-15 10:50:51+00:00): Füge bitte das nächste Mal auch noexit=yes an den Sackgassenpunkt an, sonst könnte jemand denken, dass die Wege doch verbunden sind.
Das erledige ich nun für dich in meinem Änderungssatz.
adiatmad (2024-07-18 04:39:04+00:00): Hello, Phoe Khal! Can you shed some light on why you've paired landuse=residential with highway=residential? Based on what I've read on the OSM Wiki, I'm not entirely sure if this is standard practice. Thanks!

> (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Alanduse)
> (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1301226620)
> (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/782347355)
> (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1301071378)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153890457
GorgorMith (2024-10-21 20:39:39+00:00): Hi ADFC-Winsen,

du/ihr werdet sicher zustimmen, dass man hier als Mensch auf der Suche nach Fast Food schwerlich etwas Brauchbares zu essen findet.

Ich tagge das daher mal um zu amenity=feeding_place, feeding:for=bird

In Ordnung?
ADFC-Winsen (2024-10-22 09:03:23+00:00): Absolut OK!
Danke dir.
goedegazelle (2024-07-13 14:52:04+00:00): Ik zat uit nieuwsgierigheid naar jouw wijziging te kijken en ik heb een paar aanbevelingen:

1) het fietspad kruist de secundaire weg maar de verbinding ontbreekt.

2) Als de gebouwen zijn afgebouwd dan kun je de tags aanpassen, bijvoorbeeld:

construction=house
building=construction

wordt dan:

building=house

Succes!
mga_geo (2024-07-23 11:38:04+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi avoir découpé le rond-point https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4945950/history ?
Cette découpe a des impacts sur les relations route=bus dont le trajet n'est plus continu.
Marc
danieldegroot2 (2024-07-13 14:26:44+00:00): Removed defibrillator manufacturer. adding it was a misunderstanding. Only the cabinet is visible. It comes from the retailer.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 04:38:52+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164840069
Filip009 (2024-07-13 15:45:38+00:00): Zdravím, prosím pridávajte pred telefónne číslo aj znak "+".
Anas masuris (2024-07-18 21:58:00+00:00): Hej, niestety trzeba poprawić tagowanie na torach bocznych, gdyż nie jest to możliwe, aby wszystkie miały ref=202 i maxspeed=120. W dokumentacji projektowej na pewno miałeś numery torów oraz ich sygnalizację - pozwoli to rozróżnić poszczególne rodzaje torów.

Poniżej przesyłam szablon oznaczania:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:OpenRailwayMap/Tagging_in_Poland
Anas masuris (2024-07-18 22:14:53+00:00): Jak coś, można do mnie pisać w tej sprawie. Pomogę :)
Marcos Dione (2026-04-07 17:27:08+00:00): if it's a meeting point you should map it with a point and his tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dassembly_point
redd (2026-04-07 17:54:10+00:00): Ok, thanks, done
KarttaMursu (2024-07-13 19:25:23+00:00): Thank you very much for this, as well as changeset 153894211. Will be much easier to map these areas now.
HellMap (2024-07-13 16:09:13+00:00): Hi!

Could you please clarify what you are trying to map here so we can try and fix the tags? This seems unlikely to be a telecom company office here.

Thanks
Colbertson (2024-07-14 05:35:44+00:00): Did some digging, the mural part looks like its real
https://www.delfi.lv/193/politics/55902522/liepaja-realize-skolnieces-ideju-apgleznotas-tris-katlumajas
kirils (2024-07-14 09:17:34+00:00): This is not a telecomms office. I couldn't find the right category in Organic Maps app. This is a small power (and/or heat) generation substation. 

Could you kindly recommend the right object category to use in Organic Maps next time?
HellMap (2024-07-14 09:34:44+00:00): I assume the building with the new mural is this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127497678 Looks like it matches the article.

The correct tags for the mural are `tourism=artwork` + `artwork_type=mural`. Normally, these are attached to the building wall on which they appear.

For the building, which looks like a boiler house (katlu māja), it would be `power=generator` with `generator:output:heat=yes`. There are other tags like `generator:type`, `generator:method` and `generator:source`, but I have no idea what these are for this one.

I'm afraid I don't use or know enough about Organic Maps to say how to do this there and how to specify the tags. It might have a mural preset. I doubt there's a boiler house preset.

I fixed this here for now as far as I understand it.
empty_child (2024-07-13 20:33:56+00:00): It's not a typo. It's an official transcription
Sioux_ (2024-07-17 11:38:37+00:00): The buildings have an official sign where the street name ist written in Georgian and English.
That's why I changed it to the official translation.
If you wish, I can send you a picture.
empty_child (2024-07-17 11:42:14+00:00): I understand. But the local community decided to use only Georgian street names as a point of truth. Other languages are being processed under official rules
Sioux_ (2024-07-17 12:11:19+00:00): All right, thanks for the explanation!
empty_child (2024-07-17 12:26:24+00:00): We time to time adding comments about controversial points
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Georgia_Abkhazia_South-Ossetia#Street_Naming_Rule_for_Different_Languages
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-14 09:10:13+00:00): vandalism reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153921713
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 14:51:55+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153897007
Leo Slager (2024-07-13 19:58:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-07-13 20:01:33+00:00): De wegen waren al voorzien van bicycle=use_sidepath.
Dat is al voldoende om te voorkomen dat fietsers deze weg gaan gebruiken.
Toevoegen van cycleway:left of right heeft daar geen invloed op en is ook overbodig.
User352789 (2024-07-13 20:31:25+00:00): Is dit dan een problem met OSRM:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bike&route=52.1822%2C4.4985%3B52.1679%2C4.5110#map=15/52.1751/4.5038
Leo Slager (2024-07-13 20:51:14+00:00): Interessant probleem. Ik ga kijken of ik de oorzaak van die foutieve route kan vinden.
Leo Slager (2024-07-13 21:02:43+00:00): Dat lijkt inderdaad een probleem van OSRM te zijn. Routering vindt plaats over een highway met access=no
een highway met bicycle=use_sidepath en over een footway.
Het lijkt er dus op dat alle highways worden gebruikt voor routering ongeacht welke tags er zijn toegevoegd.

De ingebouwde routers Valhalla en GraphHopper geven wel de juiste route weer.
Leo Slager (2024-07-13 21:04:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bike&route=52.18126%2C4.49856%3B52.17975%2C4.49843
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=52.18126%2C4.49856%3B52.17976%2C4.49811
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_bicycle&route=52.18126%2C4.49856%3B52.17976%2C4.49811#map=18/52.18002/4.49793
Leo Slager (2024-07-13 21:19:00+00:00): Ik heb een item aangemaakt op het forum.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/osrm-navigatie-is-van-slag/116019
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 14:35:19+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153896333
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 14:37:42+00:00): Please stop that vandalism!
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 14:51:25+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153896988
Filip009 (2024-07-13 15:43:27+00:00): Zdravím, najlepšie by bolo aj pridať bod a ty predajne. Takto keď pridáte na budovu meno, tak niekto nebude vedieť o aký typ predajne sa jedná. Odporúčam vybrať niečo z tohto https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 14:49:45+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153896919
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 14:49:30+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153896909
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 14:49:18+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153896903
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 14:49:01+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153896898
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 14:48:48+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153896895
BCNorwich (2024-07-13 18:50:24+00:00): Fiction removed.
hans_im_glueck (2024-07-13 14:19:05+00:00): falscher Kommentar, sollte sein "Oberfläche bestimmt"
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 14:46:13+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153896823
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 14:36:34+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153896391
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 14:37:21+00:00): Please stop that vandalism!
BCNorwich (2024-07-13 18:56:43+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The feature you named is not a wall nor is it named The Wall, it is the outline of a private parkland. The sections of the outline that are walls are separately tagged as such. I've removed your tag 'The Wall'.

Regards Bernard.
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 14:47:31+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153896859
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 14:45:53+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153896814
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 14:44:01+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153896731
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 14:45:19+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153896790
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 14:39:23+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153896537
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 14:39:45+00:00): Please stop that vandalism!
marczoutendijk (2024-07-13 19:10:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16443


Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 14:47:13+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153896850
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 14:46:59+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153896846
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 14:54:18+00:00): Please stop that vandalism!
marczoutendijk (2024-07-13 19:07:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16442


Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 15:24:36+00:00): Hello guillermo gonzabay, and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 15:25:47+00:00): Hello Luiz_Melo, and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
Luiz_Melo (2024-07-14 00:28:26+00:00): Hello pitscheplatsch, I am developing a registration for my master's thesis. My modifications aim to build a database for the city hall of Piraí do Norte. Currently, the city does not have any information, the houses do not have numbers or any kind of registration. The numbering I implemented will serve as a basis to assist in city mapping, land use planning, and urban planning.
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-14 06:40:21+00:00): Thank your for your reply, Luiz_Melo.

I think it's better not to use the name-tag for the project you're describing, even if you don't have any house numbers.

Have you considered presenting and discussing your project in the OSM forum?

https://community.openstreetmap.org
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-07-15 18:12:29+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/can-i-create-temporary-labels-for-buildings-without-information/116052
Syl (2024-07-30 07:33:24+00:00): Bonjour, il n'y a pas besoin de préciser "Su closed" dans les horaires.
meryl_atpfr_bot (2024-07-31 15:36:39+00:00): Bonjour Syl, merci de la précision.
Est-ce un problème ou juste optionnel ?
Les tags opening_hours ajoutés viennent de AllThePlaces, je les retranscrits sans modification. 
Je pourrais ajouter un filtrage au script d'import pour retirer tous les 'Su Closed" dans les prochains changesets si nécessaire.
Syl (2024-08-01 14:17:38+00:00): Merci pour ce détail, je ne savais pas que ça venait directement d'ATP sans modification.
Ce n'est pas un problème, cela complexifie juste les horaires sans ajouter d'information supplémentaire.
Si c'est simple de les enlever sans risquer d'introduire des erreurs, pourquoi pas, sinon ça n'en vaut peut-être pas la peine et ça serait plutôt à améliorer du côté d'ATP.
Encore une fois merci pour ces imports.
meryl_atpfr_bot (2024-08-01 16:14:42+00:00): ...et merci à toi de jeter un coup d’œil sur ces imports, ça aide à améliorer les prochains ;)
En effet, je pense que ce serait mieux de faire remonter cela au niveau de ATP, je vais aborder le sujet sur leur github.
N'hésite pas si tu vois autre chose.
pyrog (2025-06-12 13:02:44+00:00): Salut Meryl,

Le spider a pris les website dans la version anglaise au lieu de la version française.

J'en ai corrigé au moins un.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1049540349

Je ne sais pas si il choisi le site web locale maintenant (je n'ai pas encore installé et testé ATP)

En tout cas merci pour ton travail,

Yves

PS: je vois que pour les premiers objets du changeset il suffit de changer la langue dans l'url : 

https://stores.footlocker.fr/en/fr-84/lepontet/553-avenue-louis-braille-53_31_05437.html

https://stores.footlocker.fr/fr/fr-84/lepontet/553-avenue-louis-braille-53_31_05437.html
Lisapple (2024-07-29 11:14:17+00:00): La boutique "node/1939356268" n'a pas les bons horaires, sans doute parce que le magasin est fermé entre 12h et 14h30, ce qui n'est sans doute pas géré par le crawler.
meryl_atpfr_bot (2024-07-30 06:37:58+00:00): Très juste, l'horaire a été importé, je vais regarder ce qui cloche dans les prochains jours.
meryl_atpfr_bot (2024-07-31 08:13:34+00:00): C'est bon j'ai modifié le crawler ATP pour prendre en compte les fermetures en milieu de journée https://github.com/alltheplaces/alltheplaces/pull/9093
Je compte modifier les horaires erronés dans OSM lors de la prochaine version des données d'ATP (d'ici une semaine)
Lisapple (2024-07-31 12:19:45+00:00): Super pour ta modification !
Dans le cas de Léonidas, il y a aussi l'email des boutiques qui est affiché sur les pages, ça peut être intéressant de les importer dans AllThePlaces.
merylstreet (2024-07-31 15:04:12+00:00): Oui j'ai vu, c'est déjà récupéré et importer dans AllThePlaces mais pour l'instant je me focalise sur website/hours/phone. Surement dans le futur !
merylstreet (2024-08-06 09:08:38+00:00): C'est bon nouvelle version d'ATP hier avec les bons horaires, je viens de mettre à jour dans OSM pour Leonidas
emersonveenstra (2024-07-17 11:05:11+00:00): Hi there,

You created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1301120204 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1301120206 with no tags, could you please go back and tag them? Thanks!
Js7h (2025-08-20 22:31:57+00:00): Relation "Rechberg Straße" wurde mittlerweilse verlegt, allerdings ist die Reihenfolge der Abschnitte nicht korrekt, dazu siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170749485#map=15/47.20461/15.64157
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 15:26:54+00:00): Hello Luiz_Melo, and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
Pieter Vander Vennet (2024-07-26 14:11:13+00:00): You've added a stile here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11536825169 but it is snapped to a tertiary road. I assume that this is incorrect, shouldn't this be on the footway going west?
stsquad (2024-07-29 09:42:01+00:00): there is signs of a footway over the stile but I haven't had time to do a proper trace of it. You are right it is not part of the Old Hereford Road.
martianfreeloader (2024-11-29 21:16:26+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to Openstreetmap. Note that we do not map steps as areas (closed ways).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=steps

Happy mapping!
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 15:34:42+00:00): Hello Luiz_Melo, and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
mueschel (2024-07-14 08:10:54+00:00): Hallo,
schau bitte mal nach den "parking:" Tags hier. Im Key darf kein "side" auftauchen - das muss ersetzt werden durch left / right / both.
Herwescheluc (2024-07-14 09:16:01+00:00): Guten Morgen, mueschel!
Da hab ich aber richtig gut geschlafen - Danke für's Aufwecken...
Andreas
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-17 08:32:07+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12051443698/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
cat_not_deprecated (2025-04-20 16:33:30+00:00): Hello, this is a company that does international shipping for consumers. I'm not sure how to tag this.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-22 16:57:31+00:00): is it an internal office?

or place where customers walk in to leave a parcel?

or something else?
cat_not_deprecated (2025-04-25 15:48:11+00:00): Customers can walk in
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-25 17:37:11+00:00): for now I applied

shop = shipping
description=company that does international shipping for consumers - POI open to customers, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153899176
cat_not_deprecated (2025-04-25 17:41:41+00:00): Thank you :)
Udarian (2024-07-13 16:16:23+00:00): crossing:signals=no on crossing=uncontrolled is implied and thus shouldn’t be added, please stop doing this, this also applies to crossing:signals=yes on crossing=traffic_signals since that to is implied.
haycam (2024-07-13 20:25:40+00:00): That makes a lot of sense. Sorry that I've been continuing to make that mistake. I'll make sure to keep things more concise from now on!
BCNorwich (2024-07-13 19:10:00+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I think these paths ways are actually paths and should be tagged as such as per OSM guidelines. If they are not open to the public then the correct thing to do is add the tag access=private which indicates that there is no public access whatever, no other restriction tags are necessary. 

The ways should not have a description in the name tag, these tags should be changed to description=?  Lastly I wonder if you meant the description to indicate bird ringing, rather than bird riging.

Regards Bernard.
NTWickenFenPaths (2024-07-14 09:28:34+00:00): Hello

Thanks will look into that.
NN MTB (2025-01-23 13:19:54+00:00): Please note that observation tower has already been mapped there on a polygon and there is no need to duplicate it with a point.
ToniE (2024-08-16 13:58:35+00:00): Sieht eher nach Lagerplatz aus, der während der Zeit der Baumaßnahmen Gleiskörper zwischen Neubiberg und Höhenkirchen-Siegertsbrunn genutzt wird.

D.h. im September 2024 oder später nochmals prüfen
ToniE (2024-08-16 13:58:56+00:00): Sieht eher nach Lagerplatz aus, der während der Zeit der Baumaßnahmen Gleiskörper zwischen Neubiberg und Höhenkirchen-Siegertsbrunn genutzt wird.

D.h. im September 2024 oder später nochmals prüfen
Leo Slager (2024-07-13 20:03:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Frans S (2024-07-20 14:27:46+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------

A: Inaccurate mapping. It cost more time to correct your mappings rather than delete them and map them all over again.
E: Buildings not squared. 
Buildings need to be tagged as building=yes

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153900540
willkmis (2024-07-14 01:53:05+00:00): Hi, appreciate you trying to fix up the CA route 2 relation here. I *think* in this change you've added "missing" sections of CA 2 between the 405 and West Hollywood/La Brea, is that right? If so, are you sure those segments are actually currently part of CA 2? I thought that those portions had been relinquished by the state and were no longer officially part of the route. That seems to be what's indicated in the official definition: https://law.justia.com/codes/california/code-shc/division-1/chapter-2/article-3/section-302/, and a very detailed local roadgeek page: https://www.cahighways.org/ROUTE002.html. But let me know if you have some other source that says otherwise!

Best,
Will
Vas111 (2024-07-14 17:16:07+00:00): Hello Will,
I was under the impression that the relation was indeed missing a piece since the section I added still has the ref 'CA 2', but it seems I need to do better research, my mistake. Should I revert my changeset and replace the ref with old_ref?
Regards,
Vas
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 18:48:47+00:00): Hello Bruno Girin, and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
Bruno Girin (2024-07-14 10:37:33+00:00): I'm happy to update the names if you point out which ones are problematic.

We use the name of the cultivar when known. We've occasionally had the species in the name too, I'm trying to move that part to a Wikidata species link.

What format should we use for the name?
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-14 10:41:01+00:00): Thank you very much for your answer.

Do you know the following OSM wiki page for mapping tree's? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree