piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hugoren Martinako (2026-01-22 08:35:48+00:00): Hi James, siento decirte que estás completamente equivocado. Primero, admites que mapeas para en render, para ver los nombres en los tiles. Segundo, porque estás duplicando los nombres directamente, en vez de usar alt_name o derivados. Tercero, los miembros de las relaciones de rutas no llevan el mismo nombre de la propia ruta.

Desde la comunidad española, te pedimos por favor que te abstengas de seguir mapeando de esta manera. Este changeset será revertido.

Regards
Sikal (2026-01-27 20:00:54+00:00): Bonjour,

Je vois que vous vous êtes référé au DRR du service annuel 2027. Celui-ci est à l'état de projet et n'est pas d'application. Le DRR du SA 2026 (https://www.sncf-reseau.com/drr/drr-horaire-service-2026) version 4 mentionne au point 2.7 que seule la partie Mont-Saint Martin - Longuyon (exclu) est équipée de l'ETCS en exploitation. L'ETCS entre Zoufftgen et Uckange est actuellement hors-service.

Aucune autre mise en service de l'ETCS n'est prévue sur le corridor Longuyon - Basel avant 2027.

Pouvez-vous corriger cela s'il vous plaît ?

Merci d'avance ! :-)
AurélienQ (2026-01-28 10:40:30+00:00): Bonjour,
Tu as raison, je prends note et vais corriger ça prochainement.

Bonne journée,
Aurélien
NeisBot (2026-01-22 06:20:58+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 17 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/613092983 v5 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5802014225 v7
https://osm.org/node/5802014240 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177534887
NeisReview (2026-01-29 07:09:46+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177569396
9_tab (2026-01-21 22:55:00+00:00): Pouvez-vous préciser lors de ce type de modif. quels pays sont concernés?  Ou le limiter géographiquement d'avantage? Merci.
Destabilizacja (2026-01-21 18:49:28+00:00): Najstarsze mapy z początku XVIII w. zawierają nazwę "SAdowa" od sadu i to jest zgodne z współczesną nazwą główną PRNG. Nazwa oboczna występująca w PRNG "SOdowa Góra" wynika z zmazurzenia samogłoski A na O przez lokalną ludność posługującą się gwarą.
BCNorwich (2026-01-22 06:45:36+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Everything added to OSM must be factual and verifiable by other folk. I've removed the name because not verifiable as per:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability

Regards Bernard.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-23 04:32:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1469228661

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
maro21 (2026-01-24 14:10:17+00:00): Gdzie w tym zestawie edytowałeś kościół? Jezdnia na moście nie jest zabytkiem, te dane powinny się znaleźć na obiekcie mostu.
WieKo68 (2026-01-24 14:20:42+00:00): poprawione
maro21 (2026-01-24 14:10:43+00:00): Gdzie w tym zestawie edytowałeś kościół? Jezdnia na moście nie jest zabytkiem, te dane powinny się znaleźć na obiekcie mostu.
WieKo68 (2026-01-24 14:20:09+00:00): Rzeczywiście, zasugerowałem się nazwą i stąd ten błąd. Już poprawiam.
maro21 (2026-01-24 14:11:11+00:00): Gdzie w tym zestawie edytowałeś kościół? Jezdnia na moście nie jest zabytkiem, te dane powinny się znaleźć na obiekcie mostu.
WieKo68 (2026-01-24 14:25:09+00:00): poprawiłem. Nie zwróciłem uwagi, że to jest tak zmapowane
rhhs (2026-01-21 19:24:47+00:00): You mean it is planned to build a road there, but it's not there yet and construction hasn't started?
countzer0 (2026-01-21 20:38:08+00:00): there is public road  with asphalt, going next to a building, just ending in a fence at the end of the property, as on the other side is private property, and still can't connect to it.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-23 04:32:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1469232719

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pwbriggs (2026-01-21 19:29:42+00:00): Actually, bus relations look fine.
eggie (2026-01-21 20:51:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
mweper (2026-01-21 22:51:05+00:00): Dentro de zona urbana, la velocidad máxima es de 60 km/h. Lo dice la ley y los carteles en el lugar. Además hay radares de 60 km/h.
Por favor, corregir esto.
mweper (2026-01-21 22:54:39+00:00): usar "maxspeed:forward" y "maxspeed:backward" para especificar la máxima por sentido de circulación.
NeisBot (2026-01-22 06:23:22+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/9105751443 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Supplement store"

#MapWithoutSpam
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-22 09:16:50+00:00): Hi shiverinthedark,

I am not sure the added tagging fully makes sense. Did you perhaps try to add this store: https://harder-supps.com/
?

Danke und viele Grüße
Pascal
shiverinthedark (2026-01-22 20:11:45+00:00): Hi Pascal, 
yes, the store at this location is a branch of that brand. Why wouldn't you enter the name?
Best, shiver
John Kastner (2026-01-23 03:41:15+00:00): I've update the name. For future reference, this sort of fixme comment is probably better suited for a note, where it's more likely someone will notice and fix it.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes#Using_notes
TommyRPG5 (2026-01-23 04:33:14+00:00): Hi John - I still see it listed as Post Park. Any ETA on when the change will be live?

Thank you!
NeisBot (2026-01-21 19:44:22+00:00): Hi Gian Marco T, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 88% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 3 highway(s)
- 5 name(s)
- 25 waterway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177537987
Gian Marco T (2026-01-22 09:42:05+00:00): i confirm
NeisBot (2026-01-22 06:23:23+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13474530284 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Townhomes"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-29 15:15:44+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177853084
(No visible changes after review)
silversurfer83 (2026-01-21 21:07:25+00:00): Moin Malte,

hier müsstest du nochmal ran. Beim Verschieben der Kartenansicht hast du einen Wegpunkt stark verzogen, was dir auch eine Warnung beim Hochladen beschert haben müsste. Hab das mal rückgängig gemacht.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177540382

Bei Fragen immer raus damit
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177538303
mapperich (2026-05-10 09:02:06+00:00): Hi LachendesKnie, 
hier ist dir wohl ein Fehler passiert. Entweder der Ort des Shops oder die Adresse ist falsch. Ich nehme an ersteres. 
LG 
mapperich
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-23 15:32:19+00:00): Could you doublecheck the location of this?  It appears to have been added in the dead center of a paved intersection where putting a pole is highly unlikely.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177538601
eggie (2026-01-21 20:16:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Tijdelijke evenementen worden niet opgenomen in OSM
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
DENelson83 (2026-01-23 22:31:03+00:00): My opinion is that the southern boundary of the Saanich Peninsula runs from the mouth of the Goldstream River at the head of Saanich Inlet to the mouth of the Mill Stream at the head of Esquimalt Harbour.
Twenty Mile Bison (2026-01-26 05:20:15+00:00): I definitely agree with you from a physical geography perspective! However, from a human geography perspective, I don’t know if many people share that definition. Looking at the Wikipedia page for example, the municipalities they include as part of the peninsula only include Sidney, North Saanich, Highlands, Central Saanich, and the northern portions of Saanich.

That being said, I don’t have a strong opinion on what the bounds of the peninsula should be, and would support if you want to change the boundaries to what you described above. As long as there’s always open discussion and collaborative, iterative changes, I’m happy!
AndyB_66 (2026-02-26 21:31:56+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Joseph R P (2026-02-06 17:33:12+00:00): Hello, frontage roads should be tagged as regular roads, not motorways. The motorway tag is for freeways only, and the links for the freeway ramps.
NeisBot (2026-01-22 06:23:24+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13452777185 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Health office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-29 15:15:49+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/177587177
ralley (2026-01-22 00:32:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contributions.  Two points: please use meaningful changeset comments as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments and please include the country code in phone numbers as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone
Fraxi (2026-01-21 20:43:29+00:00): Използвани снимки и от Mapillary
NeisBot (2026-01-22 06:23:25+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13456695136 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Vape shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-29 15:15:49+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177853088
(No visible changes after review)
Malte HPunkt (2026-01-22 17:29:52+00:00): Da habe ich tatsächlich ziemlichen Mist gebaut.
Danke für revert
NeisBot (2026-01-22 06:23:26+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13452941570 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Vaporizer shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-29 15:15:50+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177853089
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-22 06:23:27+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11358720609 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dance Academy"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-29 15:15:50+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177853090
(No visible changes after review)
AndresDuhour (2026-01-24 13:26:52+00:00): Hola! te quería hacer un comentario por las interpolaciones. Hay algunos casos con números duplicados y pares e impares en la misma vía. Y el nombre de la calle solo va en los nodos de los extremos. Buenísimo el aporte! Voy a corregir algunos. Saludos!
NeisBot (2026-01-22 06:23:29+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13468373648 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Pilates studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-29 15:15:52+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177853093
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
5m4u9 (2026-01-22 01:30:01+00:00): hola, este camino que editas no es la F51, es muy probable una ruta departamental DXX.

La F51 está en el sur de Bolivia, en realidad existe hasta la ruta F59. Estoy en proceso de marcar las rutas F50-->F59 este año.

puedes revisar el proceso aquí -> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Bolivia/Red_de_carreteras_de_Bolivia
5m4u9 (2026-01-22 01:30:10+00:00): hola, este camino que editas no es la F51, es muy probable una ruta departamental DXX.

La F51 está en el sur de Bolivia, en realidad existe hasta la ruta F59. Estoy en proceso de marcar las rutas F50-->F59 este año.

puedes revisar el proceso aquí -> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Bolivia/Red_de_carreteras_de_Bolivia
osmviborg (2026-01-21 21:58:24+00:00): Det hænger ikke sammen med hvad i udtaler til pressen.
Aarslev (2026-01-21 22:41:15+00:00): Vi er blevet bedt om at fjerne en afspærring på stien til søen. Det har vi gjort. Men der er ikke forlangt adgang fra offentlig vej til stien ad de her markerede (og stadig ikke eksisterende) veje.
Lostmonkey (2026-01-22 06:59:33+00:00): "Mod nord har markvejen forbindelse til Silkeborgvej via asfalterede vej- og parkeringsarealer på matriklen, som ligger mellem bebyggelsen langs Silkeborgvej.": https://mfkn.naevneneshus.dk/afgoerelse/f383833b-83a3-4b2c-9901-58d49ee9adde
eggie (2026-01-22 09:58:27+00:00): review_requested 	yes

Hoi,

Lijkt me oke. 'k Zie wel die pedestrian door allerlei obstakels lopen. Wellicht zijn die nu wel weg?
In ieder geval niet gaan knippen in de wegen, want er lopen twee routerelaties waaronder het Pieterpad. 
Schuiven kan wel. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-21 21:54:47+00:00): Paden die echt niet meer herkenbaar zijn als pad tag ik met disused:highway=path of in dit geval als  disused:highway=bridleway

Dan blijft de info in de data, maar je ziet het pad niet meer op de kaart en het zal ook niet routeren.
access=no is eigenlijk altijd verkeerd gebruikt.

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2026-01-22 06:23:31+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13458829967 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Wine Bar"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-29 15:15:52+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177853094
(No visible changes after review)
Rainero (2026-03-18 17:53:41+00:00): Revert mit changeset/180072120
(unzulässige Quelle)
ggs290 (2026-01-21 22:03:16+00:00): Subí la capa errónea, siento las molestias.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177542015
NeisBot (2026-01-21 21:54:22+00:00): Hi Gian Marco T, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 89% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 2 natural(s)
- 5 waterway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177541714
Gian Marco T (2026-01-22 09:41:47+00:00): yes, i confirm.
NeisBot (2026-01-22 06:23:32+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13471226758 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Car dealership"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-29 15:15:53+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177853096
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-22 06:23:33+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13458779702 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mobile IV clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-29 15:15:55+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177853098
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-01-22 06:23:34+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13461082160 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Real estate office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-29 15:15:57+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177853101
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
mueschel (2026-01-27 11:33:13+00:00): Hi,
what's a "heavy_quadricycle"? This term isn't used in other places and I can't find it in the source.
NeisBot (2026-01-22 06:23:35+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13468874228 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tony Romas restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-29 15:15:57+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177853102
(No visible changes after review)
rempshaener (2026-01-25 19:12:22+00:00): Hallo,
ich bin auf dieses Changeset gestoßen.
Aus der Angabe von „source“ schließe ich, dass du die Daten nicht eigenständig erhoben hast.
Das stellt einen Import dar, für den Standard gelten, siehe osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines bzw. osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct.
Die Datenqualität ist meines Erachtens nicht ausreichend, um die Daten unverändert bestehen zu lassen.

1) Siehe z. B.
www.openstreetmap.org/node/13475066472
www.openstreetmap.org/node/13475071894
www.openstreetmap.org/node/13475071884
www.openstreetmap.org/node/13475071882
Diese Hydranten liegen alle innerhalb von Gebäudeumrissen.

2) Am Beispiel www.openstreetmap.org/node/13475072062: Der Hydrant müsste auf der Sperrfläche liegen, da ist aber kein Hydrant, siehe https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=653008100920558

3) Hinzu kommt, dass die Hydranten ein eher ungewöhnliches contact:website enthält. Da ich bezweifeln möchte, dass das Hydrantennetz wirklich durch die Feuerwehr unterhalten (finanziert, errichtet, verantwortet) wird, passt das nicht.

Insbesondere wegen der Mängel unter 1 und 2 denke ich, dass ein Revert dieses Imports die beste Lösung wäre.

Ich würde mich über eine Rückmeldung freuen, ob du andere Möglichkeiten siehst, die vorgenannten Probleme zu beseitigen.

Viele Grüße