piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dgmapping (2023-08-19 15:50:26+00:00): Considering that highway=path is already quite ambiguous, adding just surface=asphalt would be misleading. In a urban environment it should be safe to assume surface=asphalt has excellent smoothness. I personally wouldn't use surface tag at all since half of the year this path is covered with moss/mud/leaves/snow/ice. If you really need to use surface tag then "paved" should be acceptable.

Sure, not actually suggestion to use asfaldipuru or any other nonstandard tag.
vicente lopez 2021 (2023-08-18 19:27:23+00:00): ahi corregi las rotondas
silversurfer83 (2023-08-23 14:41:17+00:00): Hi :)
du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand deine Änderung ansieht.

Von meinem Schreibtisch aus würde ich sagen, dass das ziemlich gut geworden ist. Das einzige, was ich persönlich noch machen würde ist die Adressen der südlichen Häuser, die im Kataster noch nicht vorhanden sind, entweder mutig zu interpolieren (also einfach immer +2 von den schon bekannten rechnen) und dann ein "fixme=Adresse geschätzt" an das Gebäude zu schreiben, oder ich würde mich auf mein Rad setzen und jetzt mit StreetComplete die Adressen vor Ort erfassen.
Wäre aber alles nur Bonus. So wie du das hier eingetragen hast ist es schon ziemlich gut :)

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140022257
rowcherryrow (2023-08-21 17:02:56+00:00): Correction: Source used was Bing aerial imagery; Esri World Imagery.
map per (2024-04-20 08:06:45+00:00): Hallo EBSerKartler,

ich hab eine Frage zum Parkplatz am Tierpark in München. Können Autos hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2420252364) durchfahren oder ist der Parkplatz dort vom Wohngebiet getrennt?

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
map per (2024-04-20 08:17:22+00:00): Hab grad noch mal weiter geschaut: Entlang der Kistlerhofstraße sind viele 'crossing:markings' Einträge falsch. Bitte nicht blind alle Verbesserungsvorschläge von ID übernehmen. So wie du das hier gemacht hast behebst du keine Kartendaten Probleme, sondern verschleierst sie nur.
EBSerKartler (2024-04-21 09:18:38+00:00): letztes Jahr war ich mehrmals am Tierpark-Parkplatz. Meine Beobachtung: Die Zufahrt von der Alemannenstraße wird zeitweise abgesperrt (Gitter), ist aber zeitweise offen.  Dementsprechend steht hier barrier=fence und fence_type=temporary. Inzwischen könnte sich das natürlich auch geändert haben...
map per (2024-04-21 13:39:22+00:00): Ok, danke
Carto'Cité (2023-12-30 12:38:03+00:00): Bonjour VDZD,
Tu as ajouté ce chemin que tu as décrit comme une piste cyclable. Sauf cas particuliers il faut décrire les aménagements en pistes quand il y a une signalétique C113 ou B22a. Est-ce que tu peux me confirmer que c'est bien le cas car la portion est toute petite et je ne la vois pas dans les photos Mapillary de 2020 ?
Merci d'avance pour ton aide 🙂
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Carto'Cité (2023-12-30 12:40:00+00:00): Je pense qu'il s'agit de chemin qu'on voit sur cette photo à gauche :
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1221957648238181
Je modifie dans ce sens mais ce n'est pas ça je corrigerai.
Charles
mike140 (2023-08-17 18:25:19+00:00): Для вирівнювання будинків використовуйте клавішу Q
emersonveenstra (2023-08-25 02:59:44+00:00): Hi,

Why did you remove the name of the village here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1163105921/history
cmxn (2023-08-25 13:27:55+00:00): Because I replaced it with a node that labels the community as a village. Prior, the only label was the residential area itself.
silversurfer83 (2023-08-23 14:33:02+00:00): Moin

wer soll denn diese Relationen instandhalten? Das muss doch nicht sein, oder?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140023668
emersonveenstra (2023-08-25 02:58:22+00:00): Hi,

Did you mean to move this node so far away? https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/153484718
cmxn (2023-08-25 13:26:41+00:00): Yes, I relocated the node to near the center of the most densely populated part of the city.
emersonveenstra (2023-08-22 14:34:23+00:00): Hi,

You created a way with no tags here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1199235163

Could you please go back and tag it? Thanks!
mariotomo (2023-08-18 07:56:35+00:00): hola. pero qué es eso? es un trabajo de fantasía, cierto? lo borras tú? sería mejor, sino alguien encargado de la calidad de datos te tendrá que explicar que no está bien inventar.
radnaj (2023-08-18 13:25:14+00:00): En las fotos aéreas no se aprecia que esa forma esté en el estadio (y en OSM la política es no dibujar las líneas pintadas en hierba, por ejemplo). 

Pero incluso si se dibujasen, habría que hacerlo correctamente, y no marcando las líneas como "barrier=wall" puesto que no son muros reales.
radnaj (2023-08-18 13:28:03+00:00): "barrier=retaining_wall", quería decir. 

Creo que habría que eliminar los ways  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1199236331 y   https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1199236332
MisoBqi (2023-08-28 18:17:41+00:00): Ahoj, všimol som si, že si nanovo nakreslil cestu pozdĺž severozápadného úseku D1 od konca PB estakády po mostík cez vážsky kanál pri Pov. Podhradí. Dal si povrch asfalt, hoci je to obyčajná poľná cesta plná výmoľov, momentálne plných vody. Tiež tag service je asi nepatričný, pričom max je grade2. Ak máš záujem, mám aktuálne foto z dneška. Mohol by si PLS dať to na poriadok.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-17 17:40:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355286214

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-11 17:31:38+00:00): poprawione
adreamy (2023-08-26 05:46:48+00:00): 고속화도로의 요건 가운데 입체교차로가 대체로 포함이 되나, 입체교차로의 유무가 고속화도로의 요건은 아니라고 봅니다.
요건에 대한 논의는 공식 포럼이나 텔레그램 사랑방 등에서 함께 해 주시기 바랍니다.
adreamy (2023-08-26 05:52:55+00:00): 아, 덧붙이자면, 잘못 분류하셨다는 뜻은 아닙니다.(어떤 걸 어떻게 지정하셨는지는 몰라서...)
다만 신호등, 건널목, 입체교차로 유무가 고속화도로의 규정 요건은 아니라는 의견을 말씀드리는 것입니다. ^^
empty_child (2023-08-17 20:53:38+00:00): medotkato, добрый день
Спасибо за ваш вклад в проект
Пожалуйста, не называйте объекты общими именам, когда для этого достаточно тега. В данном случае shop=grocery без названия более чем достаточно
Ropino (2023-09-30 10:22:46+00:00): Hi,
please check/correct:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1199240975
"highway=access" ?
"access" is not a highway-type:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
thx in advance
mcliquid (2023-08-18 07:38:19+00:00): Ist das ein Spielplatz oder ein Sportplatz (Fußball). Jedenfalls ist es kein "landuse=recreation_ground".
Und du hast eine Adresse ohne Hausnummer angegeben. Kann man an diesen Spielplatz Post zustellen? Falls nein, erhält dieser auch keine Adresse.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140025475
hrhino (2023-08-18 13:08:45+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM! Do be careful, since it seems that this building is already mapped: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091737675. Also, there's no need to tag a node as name=Building; the building=yes tag on the way is the preferred label.

Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140025554
mcliquid (2023-08-18 07:36:04+00:00): Wird hier nicht gerade gebaut, sodass die Adressen bald relevant werden?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140025561
pitfire (2023-08-18 02:51:55+00:00): Ik denk dat de ingang ook wordt beïnvloed: 30 und NL:urban
Weg: Boutenslaan 	w1079760775  (j) 	
Bedankt en groeten
Kin Sapalot (2023-08-18 10:26:17+00:00): Het bord staat pas na de ingang, ongeveer daar waar het fietspad er bij komt. 
Zal nog eens kijken naar de tags op dat stukje.
Groet,
mcliquid (2023-08-18 07:34:45+00:00): Sieht gut aus.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140025829
mcliquid (2023-08-18 07:33:52+00:00): Warum muss der Parkplatz als komplizierte Relation mit dem Haus verbunden sein? Ich würde beide Relationen löschen und nur den Parkplatz eintragen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140026104
muralito (2023-08-18 19:33:28+00:00): Hola. Revisa si no seria mejor mapearlos como emergency=disaster_help_point.
Ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Ddisaster_help_point
y ponerle las etiquetas de la ayuda que ofrecen.
mcliquid (2023-08-18 07:33:18+00:00): Die Adresse war bereits als einzelner Punkt angelegt, ich habe das Duplikat aufgelöst. An dem Block liegt die Hausnummer 8 und 10 an.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140026525
mcliquid (2023-08-18 07:32:44+00:00): Sieht gut aus.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140026577
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:15:19+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012914
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:15:14+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012912
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:15:09+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012911
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:15:04+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012910
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:15:02+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012909
mcliquid (2023-08-18 07:32:07+00:00): 1. Bei zwei Werten wird mit Semikolon (;) getrennt statt mit Komma
2. access=emergency soll man nicht verwenden, stattdessen "emergency=yes"
3. access=delivery würde für alle gelten, also auch für Fußgänger. Deshalb ist "motor_vehicle=delivery" besser geeignet.

Ich habe die Änderungen bereits angebracht.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140026956
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:14:57+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012908
tg4567 (2023-08-20 13:16:26+00:00): Hocam wikidata eklerken wikimedia commons da ekleyebilirsin.  Böylece uygulamalar resim gösterebiliyor.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:14:52+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012905
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:14:47+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012902
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:14:42+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012900
Frans S (2023-08-20 12:48:16+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
 A new mapper !  Welcome. We hope you will enjoy mapping.


This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
A:  Inaccurate mapped (oversized several buildings)

About tagging of highways
Please read and follow the tagging rules on this linked document.
Decision tree, which tag to be used for roads
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S48CEVi3yiAYWhIJu57jtLyv0ZVUbGwJ/view?usp=share_link
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140027300
danieldegroot2 (2023-08-18 11:25:36+00:00): Hey Liamio2,

Please try to use good changeset comments to describe your changes.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Regards,

Daniel
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:14:38+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012898
AgusQui (2023-08-18 21:52:56+00:00): Hola, por favor puede explicar porque está haciendo estos cambios? Ha eliminado calles que existen, interpolaciones de numeración, también ha borrado vías paralelas en estación Gutiérrez, entre otros cambios, el cambio de Camino Centenario de primary a trunk  tampoco es coincidente con la convención argentina para clasificación de caminos.
DRIFT Bike Shop Bern (2023-08-17 19:37:14+00:00): Der Shop ist im Bernapark 19…
habi (2023-08-17 19:46:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11122108051 hast du im Bernapark 19 erfasst.
Den Knoten habe ich nicht bewegt.
Es kann sein, dass das Rendering noch nicht angepasst ist.
habi (2023-08-17 19:49:33+00:00): Ein Rendering-Problem; versuche mal die Seite neu zu laden, und/oder den Cache in deinem Browser zu leeren.

So sieht es bei mir dann aus: https://ibb.co/j5p47Xp
empty_child (2023-08-17 20:54:36+00:00): Евгения Вивдя, добрый день
Спасибо за ваш вклад в проект
Пожалуйста, не называйте объекты общими именам, когда для этого достаточно тега. В данном случае amenity=shower без названия более чем достаточно
eggie (2023-08-17 20:29:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback:  In OSM importeren we de adresnodes vanuit de BAG. (Kadaster)  Nogmaals een adres toevoegen hoeft niet.
Het adres heb ik weer verwijderd. 

ele=   is de hoogte boven zeeniveau.

Klopt dat wel?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-08-17 20:43:46+00:00): Hier was leesvoer. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels

en

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele

MVG
eggie
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-01 01:34:58+00:00): DWG revert:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141971567
WoodWoseWulf (2023-08-18 23:38:14+00:00): Hi Jeff,
Please add the names of features to the actual areas representing them rather than creating a park and adding the name to that instead.
JeffRedMaps (2023-08-23 03:40:40+00:00): Thanks...any other suggestions? My first attempt at updating the Pyramid State Park area.
SurferJake (2023-08-21 16:41:58+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-07-14
pyrog (2025-06-03 17:18:52+00:00): Bonjour Lucas,

Transformer un village en cimetière n'était pas une bonne idée 😉

JB à corrigé. Merci pour sa vigilance.

Yves

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10704934
spughetti (2023-08-20 13:02:34+00:00): Hi Fresno Map!

I noticed you added 2 separate parking lots instead of mapping the entire lot. Is there any difference between the two? If not it would be best to map the entire lot.
archpdx (2023-08-30 06:50:09+00:00): Hi there,

It looks like you added the outline of these parking spaces as a parking aisle:
https://osm.org/way/1199262049

Please note, however, that parking aisles are used for roads that pass through two rows of parking spaces (see https://wiki.osm.org/Tag:service=parking_aisle)

In this case, https://osm.org/way/1199262048 could be considered to be a parking aisle.
Fresno map (2023-08-30 15:58:12+00:00): Sorry for my mistake. Thanks for letting me know! I will correct that.
Elian D (2023-08-19 09:16:01+00:00): I believe the park boundary (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1198775808) overlaps with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1198775808. Should we correct that?
AdrianTamplaru (2023-08-19 11:18:35+00:00): Yes, we could stretch the park boundary until we get clear imagery.

I saw that you beat me to tracing the paths by one day. 😅
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-09-21 00:25:53+00:00): porque mudou esta via para track? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3964886381
mp747474 (2023-08-17 23:37:00+00:00): das El Sol in Bruchköbel ist schon seit Jahren pleite (auch wenn Google das noch nicht mitbekommen hat). Diese Änderung war unnötig, der Eintrag hätte gelöscht werden können.
wakosoft (2023-08-21 08:52:03+00:00): Okay super danke, dann ist jetzt zumindest vom OpenStreetMap raus.
spughetti (2023-08-20 12:53:14+00:00): Hi Walter! I'm not the most knowledgeable when it comes to traffic mapping but this tag might be applicable.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dlane
Walter Wittel (2023-08-21 18:25:52+00:00): Thanks for your help @publicerination!  Link was applicable. It appears the tile cache is gradually catching up with this changeset. I didn't alter the existing cycleway* tags so hopefully all map= levels will eventually render correctly as tertiary highway vs. cycleway only.
AgusQui (2023-08-17 21:49:00+00:00): Why???? Porque razón esta haciendo estos cambios?
muralito (2023-08-18 13:49:56+00:00): Hace lo que le piden porque le pagan para eso. Acá tenes como contactar al equipo para advertirles de los errores que veas y como crees que pueden mejorar. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kaart#Kaart_Data_Team
(Inactive) hairyhaggis_kaart (2023-08-18 14:16:16+00:00): Hello! Thanks for reaching out. Another editor and I were investigating the circular junction and the direction switching ways, we believed it was better to have the roads split than mapped as one. It appears there is a section that never changes direction and that is separated by a double yellow line the lanes that go back and forth. This was enough justification for us to split the ways. I had updated all of the lanes and turn restriction tags accordingly. Clearly, you do not agree with the changes I have made and that is ok, I was just making it consistent with the wiki and general editing standards. The way you have it mapped suggests that the entire way switches directions, which I believe is not the case (please correct me if I am wrong)  as there are always lanes in the eastward direction.  In addition, the circular junction in its current state doesn't function well, it's not continuous and it should also not have multiple roads on the same node. Let me know if you would like me to fix these again, it would be my pleasure.  Thanks and have a wonderful day!
AgusQui (2023-08-18 21:37:27+00:00): Perdón por responder en español. Los estándares generales de edición indican que los carriles se separan si hay un separador físico, no es el caso, salvo desde el Monumento de los Españoles hasta el hipódromo. "The way you have it mapped suggests that the entire way switches directions, which I believe is not the case" Si, tiene razón, de hecho lo hemos discutido recientemente en el Telegram de la comunidad, el problema es que otro usuario cambió esto recientemente, tengo planeado corregirlo en estos días.
"the circular junction in its current state doesn't function well, it's not continuous and it should also not have multiple roads on the same node." No entiendo a que se refiere.
gscscnd (2023-08-18 07:01:27+00:00): Do zmiany również tagi proposed na construction.
user_5359 (2023-08-27 08:11:07+00:00): Hello! Please have look on https://www.osm.org/way/1199279092, https://www.osm.org/node/10563007964. I assume the way miss also a building=yes. This objects are a duplicate entry.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-17 20:30:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11123664002

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2023-08-18 04:32:54+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on https://www.osmp.org/relation/16215233 (one of twenty relations). What is the mean of the foreign keys
CODIGO	152380100000010540034000000000
CODIGO_ANT	15238010010540034000
CODIGO_DEP	15
CODIGO_EDI	1
ETIQUETA	0
GLOBALID	183339dd-2add-44de-b6a7-9375b69bdf6a
IDENTIFICA	A
NUMERO_MEZ	0
NUMERO_PIS	2
NUMERO_SEM	0
NUMERO_SOT	0
OBJECTID	436162
Shape__Are	2.9501953125
Shape__Len	8.1228326984941503
TERRENO_CO	152380100000010540034000000000
TIPO_CONST	CONVENCIONAL
TIPO_DOMIN	PRIVADO
codigo_mun	15238 (first five character of ref:codcat, duplicate information)
?
By the way, a members relation are superfluous, since the information can also be written directly to the path.
Leonardo Gutierrez (2023-08-18 16:02:54+00:00): Thank you for being attentive

The labels have been corrected immediately, as you can see in the next set of changes, this was a small test of data brought from the cadastre of colombia and I forgot to remove them in the first upload. 

On the other hand, if maybe the relation is superfluous, I am working on it.   Regards.
mariotomo (2023-09-01 05:35:54+00:00): Hola. Please check the wiki to choose the best key/value for your improvements. Do not put all information in the 'name' field. That will be readable (to humans), but not usable by software. landuse=grass, named Orchard isn't an 'orchard'. ;-)
Same for lagoons and reservoirs. 
But thanks for adding first hand information.
Have you considered StreetComplete? It also helps placing pictures associated with notes.
NieWnen (2023-08-17 21:13:57+00:00): Co to za dziwne zmiany na S8? Wycofane ze względu na brak źródeł.
LockOnGuy (2023-08-18 05:51:34+00:00): Hello ڕاستی, In this changeset, you have deleted 150 nodes and replaced them with a tree_row way. The nodes you deleted contain the leaf_cycle and the height of the trees, and the way that you added does not contain this information, and thus your changeset has deleted that data. Can you restore them please? Regards.
olo81 (2023-08-21 15:42:54+00:00): tu chyba coś nie poszło z tym rondem, jeśli tysiąclecia jest wyłączona to po co minirondo.
Jeszcze nie byłem tu, to nie ruszam. 
Chyba że coś znajdę w internetach.
zielonytraktor (2023-08-21 21:37:52+00:00): Właśnie nie wiem skąd wzięło się to mini rondo. Zamykałem rondo nowe, bo już zaczęli kucie starego przejazdu. Jeśli nikt w między czasie go nie dodał, to może węzeł się zapodział po jakieś wcześniejszej edycji. Dzięki za poprawkę.
olo81 (2023-08-21 15:35:53+00:00): Zostało access=no
od razu poprawiam
zielonytraktor (2023-08-21 21:39:48+00:00): Dzięki, przeoczenie. Swoją drogą rondo na Granicznej / Piłsudskiego już ma pełnoprawny kształt i jeździ się nim jak rondem. Tylko nie miałem okazji zapamiętać jaki ono ma dokładnie kształt.
eggie (2023-08-17 21:58:39+00:00): Beste Gretkatilor`
Den Haag is nu juist het voorbeeld hoe het niet moet...  Probeer de landuse los te houden van de paden en wegen anders wordt de kaart onwerkbaar.
Hier heeft al eens een mapper alles aan elkaar geplakt.
Een leisure park is een tranparant en geeft de functie weer. Dat staat los van de landuse.  Dus probeer de landuse in te vullen. bv grass of forest e.d. 
Kleine stukjes groen zijn geen parken.
De transparant leisure=park kun je als een delen over de ingetekende landuse heenleggen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-08-18 05:07:57+00:00): I disconnected the area from the roads.
It's no a park according osm wiki.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2023-08-17 22:01:05+00:00): Het adres heb ik weer verwijderd.
Svp geen adressen toevoegen aan gebouwomtrekken. Er is al een adresnode.
MVG
eggie
lipuma (2023-08-17 21:31:41+00:00): Updated opening hours
mueschel (2023-08-18 08:27:18+00:00): Reminder: Please stop adding your own, private tags and read and respond to the comments you received.
Sylvain M (2023-12-27 23:45:14+00:00): Hello Awol,
I've corrected 2 remarkable trees with the tag "denotation=park" (replaced by denotation=natural_monument [1]), because this tag is not documented and it doesn't identify that the trees in question are remarkable.
I then came across your map instructions page for trees.
What do you think about changing your recommendations for the "denotation" tag?
It might be interesting to discuss this on the wiki or on an OSM forum?
Well done for all the work you've done, and I look forward to sharing our common interests in trees and cartography.

[1] see : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:denotation