piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mikini (2026-04-20 06:26:23+00:00): Det var nu ikke så meget for de her småting, dem havde jeg nok fået styr på, da det er meget tæt på hvor jeg færdes.  

Jeg er mere interesseret i lige at få generel opmærksomhed på ikke at ændre, med mindre ting kan bekræftes værende ukorrekte. Der mener jeg ikke at et ortofoto som er ~1 år gammelt vægter særligt højt i forhold til et objekt som nogen har gjort sig den ulejlighed at tilføje siden ortofotoet blev optaget.
Det er brandærgerligt når detaljer forsvinder på denne måde, det synes jeg ikke lever op til samarbejds- og konsensusånden i OSM.

Med hensyn til overflader forstår jeg ikke logikken i at en ændring af highway-værdien skulle have nogen som helst indflydelse på validiteten af et surface-tag. Hvis nogen har set grus eller græs og tilføjet tagget, så er det vel gyldigt, medmindre det kan bekræftes at overfladen har ændret sig siden den observation?

I min OSM-boble er highway=footway helt generelt til steder hvor man primært færdes til fods. Det har aldrig været forbeholdt fortove, jeg husker endda en tid hvor highway=path ikke eksisterede (godkendt i 2008) og alt til fods var footway eller cycleway+foot=yes.
Jeg synes wikien bekræfter dette, se f.eks. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Paths (footway:"includes walking tracks and gravel paths.") og https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks#History. Hvis man eksplicit vil tagge en footway som et fortov så findes footway=sidewalk til det, og et selvstændigt stiforløb uden en vej som vi taler om her ville så kunne refineres med footway=path.
For mig indikerer highway=path at vejbrugen ikke er primært for én type trafikanter (som {foot,cycle,bridle}way), men at brugen er lige mellem de taggede brugere (foot, bicycle, horse). Uden brugere er path endnu mindre eksplicit end *way-tagsne, og wikien fraråder det da nogle routere så vil undgå at anvende den pga. manglende information.
osmviborg (2026-04-20 06:34:02+00:00): OSM er en herlig ting, specielt nar det giver mulighed for at tagge den samme ting på forskellig vis. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Grusveje_og_-stier
GOwin (2026-04-14 08:49:15+00:00): Using RapiD or iD, you can enable the measurement panel using the shortcut: "Ctrl+Shift+M", or go to Map Data , then tick the checkbox for "Measurement Panel" under the Data Layer section.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181309323
NeisBot (2026-04-14 08:15:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13729306883 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Surgery clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
blef (2026-04-17 09:49:24+00:00): Bonjour, je suis revenu sur vos modifications: le tag service=parking_aisle est innaproprié ici. Voir commentaires sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181448294
ika-chan! (2026-04-14 08:55:20+00:00): Revert of 181309164 with addition of elements to disprove said changeset.
ika-chan! (2026-04-15 06:28:30+00:00): I'm sorry if I sounded a bit harsh in the changeset comment, but the issue is that the feature has to physically exist, and we in Greece have been dealing with people who add things that turn out not to exist. It's like we all suffer from the effects of "once bitten, twice shy".
Frans S (2026-04-14 12:27:31+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she deliver high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (See attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping. 

E: Buildings not squared or rounded.

H:  Mapped  fenced yards as a building.



Explanation can be found in this document, which might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards, and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181310037
Frans S (2026-04-14 12:27:40+00:00): Hello
When an object shows both a shadow on the inside as well as on the outside, it has no roof and is not a building
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181310037
Frans S (2026-04-14 13:24:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
When an object shows both a shadow on the inside as well as on the outside, and it has no roof and is not a building
Here it seems to me a fenced cattle yard.
Best regards and keep mapping
Fraxi (2026-04-14 08:47:44+00:00): Hi, MS50!
When we add international names to features in OSM, we should adhere to the Bulgarian transliteration act - https://www.mrrb.bg/static/media/ups/articles/attachments/TRANSLITERATION%20ACT48938c89238d30492f9d6456d4b8ee7e.pdf
That's why I might edit the value in question
Fraxi (2026-04-14 08:50:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181310923
Frans S (2026-04-14 12:41:41+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
When an object shows both a shadow on the inside as well as on the outside, and it has no roof and is not a building.
What you mapped here as a building seems to me to be fenced cattle yards.
You overlooked the buildings more to the south.
Best regards
Реdактор (2026-04-14 08:49:31+00:00): Плюсом ещё были возвращены утраченные какое-то время назад названия гор
Frans S (2026-04-14 12:22:30+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she deliver high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (See attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping. 

E: Buildings not squared or rounded.


Explanation can be found in this document, which might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards, and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181310731
Frans S (2026-04-14 12:37:24+00:00): Hello Thanks for mapping.
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Don't include a yard in a building, please.
Best regards, and keep mapping
MS50 (2026-04-14 15:29:27+00:00): Not the right name?
Fraxi (2026-04-14 15:35:12+00:00): I fixed it with next changeset. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181310985 
Messed up "sh" with "zh"... :)
Frans S (2026-04-14 09:09:13+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings
Don't add a name to a building. Just tag it as building=yes.
A: Inaccurate mapping.  Far oversized.

E: Buildings not squared or rounded.


Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
NeisBot (2026-04-14 09:03:58+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1076050047 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Sklep z balonami"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Sklep z balonami"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
hayashi (2026-05-02 12:35:23+00:00): 状況がわからないのにタグを削除するのは問題があります。
統合された銀行であっても現況が不明ならば タグを変更せずに fixme や note を使ってローカルマッパーに確認するように促すことに留めるべきです。
削除したタグをリバートして fixme の追加のみにしてください。
LySioS (2026-04-15 16:55:47+00:00): Merci, les changements sont bons
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181311620
Frans S (2026-04-14 13:27:19+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You mapped here a fenced yard with 3 buildings inside as 1 building.
It should be mapped as 3 (small) round buildings. I adjusted them.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2026-04-14 09:23:44+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping. 

B: Overlapping buildings.

C: Collected adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
D: Connecting nodes to other features.
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.


Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181311858
eggie (2026-04-14 10:10:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Frans S (2026-04-14 09:31:16+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181311904
Frans S (2026-04-14 09:20:43+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, don't connect nodes of a building to other objects.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181311998
NeisBot (2026-04-14 09:15:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1076050047 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Sklep balonów"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Sklep balonów"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
Frans S (2026-04-14 10:25:45+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181312065
Frans S (2026-04-14 10:35:13+00:00): Hello.
When an object shows both a shadow on the inside as well as on the outside, it has no roof and is not a building
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181312079
Frans S (2026-04-14 09:27:30+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping. 

You mapped objects < 1.5 mtr, as a building. No shadow visible.

Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181312134
Frans S (2026-04-14 13:12:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
When an object shows both a shadow on the inside as well as on the outside, and it has no roof and is not a building. 
You don't see any proof of human activity.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2026-04-14 12:45:18+00:00): When an object shows both a shadow on the inside as well as on the outside, and it has no roof and is not a building
Here it seems to ma a fenced cattle yard.
Best regards
Frans S (2026-04-14 12:47:03+00:00): Your mappings of the buildings are accurate ! 
Best regards
Piskvor (2026-04-14 10:57:09+00:00): Zdravím, 
Díky za rozšíření mapy:)
Jen detail: "jméno/name" není třeba vyplňovat popisem, co to *je* - pokud by to byl třeba dům s názvem U Zlatého Lva, pak by to patřilo do name. "Obytný dům jménem Obytný dům" je obvykle zbytečné; k určení typu budovy je značka building=*, u obytného building=residential. Upraveno. 

S pozdravem 
Piskvor
Frans S (2026-04-14 09:34:30+00:00): Hello. 
See my comments on another changeset>
Please improve your mapping skills.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181312401
Frans S (2026-04-14 09:33:13+00:00): See my comment on another changeset.
Please strengthen your mapping skills.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181312421
eggie (2026-04-14 09:54:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Zijn dit serieuze toevoegingen?
Voor een school toevoegen komt meer bij kijken dan alleen een naam op een adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-14 10:24:09+00:00): reverted by changeset #181315139
Adikso (2026-04-15 20:01:47+00:00): Proszę nie dodawać SEO opisów do nazw biznesów. Opis z nazwy został usunięty.
HellMap (2026-06-21 13:51:05+00:00): Sveiki,

Lūdzu nepievieno public_transport=platform uz highway=platform ceļiem no redaktora labojuma, ja pati pietura ir kartēta kā atsevišķs punkts. Jo tad sanāk divas pieturas vienā vietā. Un visādi StreetComplete divas reizes jautā labot abus elementus.

iD šo rāda kā kļūdu, jo uzskata, ka domāta pietura, bet tas nav pareizi Latvijā, kur pieturas pārsvarā ir ar atsevišķiem punktiem, bet klāt bieži iezīmētas arī platformas navigācijai kā ceļi.

Paldies
Frans S (2026-04-14 10:29:15+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181312810
eggie (2026-04-14 10:02:18+00:00): Beste Admin... Dit is toch een school die niet meer bestaat. Alles in OSM is groundtruth en moet verifieerbaar zijn in het veld.
Wat is je bedoeling?
Iets wat er niet meer is wordt niet opgenomen in OSM. OSM is geen historische kaart.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-14 10:23:24+00:00): reverted by changeset #181315087
Frans S (2026-04-14 10:33:06+00:00): Hello. See my comment about squaring of rectangular buildings.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181312893
eggie (2026-04-14 10:08:51+00:00): Op deze locatie zit momenteel geen onderwijsinstelling.
Deze hoort derhavle niet vermeld worden op de kaart.
Deze historische locatie kun je wel in een eigen Layer toevoegen bv in Umaps.
Dan heb je OSM als achtergrond en een eigen kaart.
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/

Die kan dan vervolgens worden opgenomen in een website.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-14 10:22:43+00:00): reverted by changeset #181315058
eggie (2026-04-14 10:37:52+00:00): Wanneer Elektrische deelfietsen de naam is van de verhuur zal het ongetwijfeld kloppen.
Mvg
eggie
Frans S (2026-04-14 10:47:25+00:00): This task. 516 has been invalidated and has to be corrected to their correct shape and diameter.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181313297
Frans S (2026-04-14 10:21:01+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181313568
Yunan973 (2026-04-15 12:05:19+00:00): Bonjour,

ce n'est pas comme cela que l'on fait les multipolygones. J'ai corrigé, tu peux voir maintenant qu'il y a 2 surfaces avec inner : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5744340/history#map=17/45.889557/-0.914666.

Je te suggère de lire le wiki si nécessaire pour mieux comprendre ce que j'ai fait par rapport à ce que tu avais fait.

N'hésites pas à me poser des questions si tu as des soucis.

Bonne continuation.
Frans S (2026-04-14 10:37:19+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping. 
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.
Mapped a tree as a building


Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181313684
Frans S (2026-04-14 10:31:48+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, rectangular buildings are not squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181313685
Frans S (2026-04-14 10:30:46+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
in 1 case you mapped a round hut as a rectangular one.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181313708