piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ivanbranco (2023-08-18 21:59:22+00:00): Hi,

many of these places seem to have descriptive names, e.g. Korean Restaurant (you mapped it twice 15mt apart btw) is really called that way? or should it be cuisine=korean?

could you take a look at them?
moje_konto (2023-08-19 00:05:28+00:00): www.openstreetmap.org/node/771346066/history

highway = traffic_signals
changed to:
highway = rest_area

It's on a street, so previous value was more likely.
rskedgell (2023-08-19 04:23:24+00:00): We also have a node called HOME which is both a historic=castle and an amenity=shelter. One for the local mapping community, but it looks a little improbable to me.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11126339605
Taya_S (2023-08-19 05:03:13+00:00): I am also pretty sure that this is not a bus stop https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11126338121
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-19 07:46:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11126338121 looks like effect of trying to add object not supported by MAPS.ME

though before fixing: what is source of this edit? Copied from Google Maps? Survey on foot? Something else?
map per (2023-08-25 10:08:03+00:00): @Batman Maps: It would be nice if you could help us here. Did you intend to upload the data into the public OpenStreetMaps database or should we roll back your changes?

Thanks and best regards
map per
map per (2023-09-02 14:37:08+00:00): I would revert this changeset. What do you think?
Taya_S (2023-09-02 14:42:26+00:00): I think thats for the best yeah. No response from the mapper either. So go ahead.
map per (2023-09-02 14:53:05+00:00): REVERTED this edit

@Batman Maps: Your additions to OpenStreetMaps were mostly nonsense so I removed all your contributions. If you want to contribute in a meaningful way take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/About_OpenStreetMap

Nevertheless best regards
map per
eggie (2023-08-19 06:50:58+00:00): Je vraagt feedback.. 
Het wordt nog wat daar. 
Helaas werkt barrier=hedge icm area=yes al een tijd niet meer. 
Carto heeft dat aangepast tot verdriet van vele mappers.
natural=shrubbery is aangevraagd, maar rendert ook nog niet.
natural=scrub werkt wel, maar de vlag moet dan wel de lading dekken. Up to you.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-08-19 06:36:33+00:00): warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway  ?
Die kan ik even niet vinden. Denk je serviceroad door het gebouw. 
Dat zal tunnel=building_passage moeten zijn. 
bicycle=yes (hoeft niet op een fietspad)  heb ik verwijderd net als oneway=no...  foot=yes hoeft ook niet. Allemaal default. 

Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-08-19 06:40:20+00:00): In de Regent 1  kun je ook de building_passage aanpassen. De eindnodes verbinden met de 'building_shape'. De binnenplaats kun je oplossen met de tuin intekenen als inner multipolygoon.
Zal het als voorbeeld intekenen bij de Regent 1.
Het gebouw is dan de outer en de tuin de inner. Anders zie je alleen maar gebouw en geen tuin.
Voor de rest ziet het er allemaal netjes uit. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-08-19 06:45:23+00:00): Tuin als inner in mp gezet. layer=-1 verwijderd.. covered=yes toegevoegd.
Neem aan dat er een parkeergarage onder het geheel zien.
CTRL-F5 voor het effect.
Groet eggie
eggie (2023-08-19 07:06:24+00:00): .. layer=-1 kan natuurlijk wel als het een ondergronds geheel is. Up to you
map per (2023-08-19 18:39:59+00:00): Hello erdwich,

"bankerl_2023-08-18" (see (1)) is not a proper name, please remove. And please respond to this changeset comment, OSM is a community project that only works with colaboration.

Thanks and best regards
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11126358827
erdwich (2023-08-20 10:57:59+00:00): Hi map per,

I would like to change the name but I don't know how. I created the POI in Osmand but since the upload the POI disappeared, so i cannot edit it any more. Can you help?

Cheers
map per (2023-08-20 18:04:02+00:00): Yes, sure, I removed the name in changeset 140145296
erdwich (2023-08-20 20:15:46+00:00): Great, thanks a lot!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-18 21:40:37+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11126361291

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Piotr Strębski (2023-08-19 19:52:39+00:00): poprawione!
literan (2023-08-19 13:15:15+00:00): здесь уже отмечены лежачие полицейские https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7667242275

их надо отмечать точками на линии дорог
eggie (2023-08-19 06:30:43+00:00): Dag Gret.. Lijkt me oke.
groet
eggie
SomeoneElse (2023-09-01 09:46:49+00:00): Excellent - has https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/835271466 reopened?
Actually it's probably been open a while now since they'd started work on it a couple of years ago.
stadt-koeln-rutha (2024-05-24 09:01:31+00:00): Hallo Baumschrat,

bist du dir bei dem Parkhaus sicher mit der Angabe der Geschosse? Kennst du das Gebäude vor Ort? Es gibt ein Erdgeschoss und ein Dachebene. Das ist für mich 1 Geschoss und müsste meiner Meinung nach mit building:levels=1 getaggt werden?!
Danke und schönes Wochenende.
eggie (2023-08-19 06:28:44+00:00): Lijkt me oke...
eggie (2023-08-19 06:29:30+00:00): fee=no ?
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 05:07:41+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146014714
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-24 02:19:15+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141665507
Kartfixaren (2024-05-02 18:59:15+00:00): Du kan inte bara ändra på hastighetsgränser för att du tycker att de verkar konstiga utan att kontrollera ifall de faktiskt är fel. Du ändrade exempelvis på denna väg, där det sitter en skylt som tydligt visar att hastighetsgränsen är 8 km/h.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22748182

Bild på skylten: https://ibb.co/dJXKwjT
riiga (2024-05-02 19:28:19+00:00): Tack för att du uppmärksammade det hela! Till mitt försvar så är denna ändring på det stora hela en förbättring, och jag har kontrollerat alla ändringar jag gjorde så gott det gick, men för just denna vägen så blev det uppenbarligen ett misstag då det inte fanns någon bra källa. Googles gatuvy är inte en källa man får använda i OSM, och jag känner inte till platsen personligen. Det är en enskild väg som inte har någon hastighet registrerad i NVDB annat än 50 km/h vilker förefaller osannolikt. I det fallet gjorde en rimlighetsbedömning: Det normala är att ett gångfartsområde (highway=living_street) har just gångfart, så står i Trafikförordningen. Därför bör dessa taggas maxspeed=walk. Många liknande vägar har ofta haft maxspeed=5, 7 eller 10 inlagt vilket är en god uppskattning av gångfart, men eftersom det inte uttryckligen är den skyltade hastigheten så ska det vara maxspeed=walk. I ditt fall så finns det, mot all förmodan, en skylt som anger att hastighetsbegränsningen faktiskt är 8 km/h. Så tro inte att jag ändrar hej vilt utan att ha god anledning för de ändringar jag gör, men vi gör alla fel ibland. Det står dig fritt att rätta mitt misstag och gärna lägga en anteckning (t.ex. "note=Hastigheten är faktiskt skyltad som 8 km/h") på vägen så att detta i framtiden kan undvikas.
Kartfixaren (2024-05-03 22:27:14+00:00): Tack för svaret. Jag har absolut förståelse för varför du gjorde på det viset, och, även om jag inte tror att denna gata är ensam om att ha en udda hastighet skyltad, så håller jag med och att förändringen på det stora hela var för det bättre.
Jag har nu ändrat tillbaka hastighetsgränsen till 8 km/h och lagt till en anteckning, såsom du föreslog.
Pikse (2024-01-15 10:06:14+00:00): Need Õismäe teega külgnevad teelõigud ei kuulu Õismäe tee koosseisu, vt:
https://xgis.maaamet.ee/adsavalik/LP00016562
ja
https://teeregister.mnt.ee/reet/map?featureOid=8369023

Samuti, ringristmike puhul eeldatakse et sildiga name=* on ära toodud ristmiku enda nimi, mitte sellega ühendatud või seda läbiva tee nimi. Üldjuhul võib ringristmiku jätta ilma nimeta, vt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#The_roundabout_itself
eggie (2023-08-19 06:28:00+00:00): Dah Gretkatillor
Je vraagt feedback.
Een onderdoorgang tag je met tunnel=building_passage  ..   layer=-1 ,moet' weg. het is maaiveldhoogte.
De weg onder de regent II zal ook buidling_passage moeten krijgen of in ieder geval covered=yes  Dat geeft hetzelfde effect.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:covered%3Dyes

en

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage

Kijk je nog even?
MVG
eggie
Andrea Musuruane (2023-08-20 10:59:42+00:00): Ciao. I parcheggi non devono finire sulla linea di mezzeria della strada adiacente. Devono contornare solo l'effettiva area di parcheggio. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140076099
MxxCon (2023-08-22 03:31:31+00:00): Hello.
This information doesn't seem correct. nycdoitt lists BIN numbers from NYC DOB's database. It's 1 number per building... Somehow multiple bins got mushed into here.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140076251
Cayenne17 (2023-12-26 14:17:36+00:00): Bonjour,
De quel source proviennent les infos ?
Le type de pylône est un autostable et pas un haubané (tower:construction). 

Où est-ce que tu as eu la date du montage du pylône (start_date) ?

Le propriétaire d'après l'ANFR c'est pas Hivory mais TDF (owner).
user_5359 (2023-08-19 05:59:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/1181098239/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I completely reversed your change set.
AndyB_66 (2023-09-11 06:26:25+00:00): Please use correct key/value combination for the proposed roads (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway).
scarapella (2023-08-27 19:59:49+00:00): Hello ConradWard,

Thanks for your contributions to openstreetmap.   

I noticed this changeset as some of the relations showed up on osmi as possible errors.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-70.74545&lat=43.96406&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

At a glance, there are a few things you may want to look at.
1) the relation 16218293 is a multipolygon with no other tags (e.g. landuse, forest, etc).  That is unusual since it is a now an object that doesn't designate anything. The same could be said for some of the other multipolygons in this region including 16219408.  I think they are not really achieving what you had in mind.
2) perly pond way 150511049 (as well as several other ways in this area) is a member of 10 relations, including 3 natural woods and 1 managed forest.  I suspect that's a few more than necessary.

Cheers,
scarapella
ConradWard (2023-08-27 20:11:55+00:00): Hello scarapella,
Thank you so much for taking a look. I have been struggling with this for a couple of weeks, but I'm not fully understanding how to fix it. All I know is that I can't get the forest to stop displaying over the pond and swamps. And I can't figure out how to consistently add multipolygons without this problem. Are you able to lay out the steps it will take to fix this and prevent me from having further issues in the future? I have not been able to find much info online so it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you again.
ps: I am not sure why some of the polygons are losing their landuse designations but it seems to be something to do with the multipolygon issues.
scarapella (2023-08-28 11:31:20+00:00): I'm happy to help.  I'll message you on osm slack.
MxxCon (2023-08-22 03:34:49+00:00): Hello.
This edit will be reverted in full.
This is absolutely INCORRECT to delete valid and correctly tagged data purely so that things look certain way in some specific map renderer.
Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140076704
Waffle1434 (2023-08-22 07:54:35+00:00): Fair enough. This seems to be how the majority of NYC downtown works with building parts though
MxxCon (2023-08-22 03:34:53+00:00): Hello.
This edit will be reverted in full.
This is absolutely INCORRECT to delete valid and correctly tagged data purely so that things look certain way in some specific map renderer.
Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140076773
MxxCon (2023-08-22 03:34:56+00:00): Hello.
This edit will be reverted in full.
This is absolutely INCORRECT to delete valid and correctly tagged data purely so that things look certain way in some specific map renderer.
Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140076798
Dimitar155 (2023-08-19 09:05:04+00:00): Промяната е върната, виж предишните дискусии: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5260763.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140086222
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-18 23:30:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6501407544

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Piotr Strębski (2023-08-19 19:50:05+00:00): poprawione!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-18 23:30:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/143082630

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Piotr Strębski (2023-08-19 19:47:20+00:00): poprawione!
ovruni (2023-08-19 06:52:56+00:00): Hola, en las relaciones de rutas además de los segmentos que forman parte de la ruta se pueden los paraderos (highway=bus_stop y/o public_transport=platform , donde los pasajeros esperan a los buses al costado de la via) con el rol de "platform" y las paradas (public_transport=stop_position, punto de la carretera donde se para los buses) con el rol de "stop" en las relaciones, estos roles ademas se suelen poner al inicio de la relación. Puedes ver un ejemplo del corredor rojo https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13707077
Saludos
murghdo (2023-08-19 14:15:37+00:00): Gracias, he hecho unos cambios. Estoy usando el corredor rojo como ejemplo.
Saludos
Dimitar155 (2023-08-19 09:13:20+00:00): Промяната е върната, виж предишните дискусии: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5260763.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140086494
user_5359 (2023-08-19 05:31:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys)!
diamondarmorsteve (2024-09-09 14:36:41+00:00): Hi, this goes against current OSM standards. There should not be abbreviations like this.
ratrun (2023-08-19 15:14:51+00:00): Hi,

Please turn this way
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1199657559 into a route relation as it looks as this route using ordinary way segments. A highway=busway is only correct if this way is exclusively reserved for buses.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:routes
Frans S (2023-08-22 10:52:12+00:00): A new mapper !  Welcome. We hope you will enjoy mapping.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapping them as 1 building.
G: include the shadow of a building in the mapping.
H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing into the mapping.


Explanation can be found on this document what might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140078190
Pathetos (2023-08-30 15:02:56+00:00): Ich wünsche Ihnen einen schönen Tag.
Ich muss sagen, ich bin wirklich enttäuscht. Als ich diese Straße im Jahr 2020 auf der Karte markiert habe, haben Sie sie gelöscht. Ich zitiere: "Hallo, mein Name ist Stefan und ich mappe vor allem den Nationalpark Thayatal und die umliegenden Gemeinden. Ich arbeite selbst im Nationalpark Thayatal und habe dadurch die Möglichkeit alle Orte zu erkunden, insbesondere, da der Zugang abseits der markierten Wanderwege normalerweise verboten ist.
Von dir sind einige Änderungen erfolgt, die auf alten Kartendaten von basemap.at oder alten Luftbildern beruhen. Ich werde diese Änderungen rückgängig machen. Viele in basemap.at eingezeichneten Wege gibt es nicht mehr, diese sind teils vollständig zugewachsen. Ein Mapping dieser Wege macht für mich daher keinen Sinn.
Lg Stefan". Hoffentlich hast du sie jetzt im Feld gefunden, so wie ich vor Jahren.
Nochmals, einen schönen Tag.
Pathetos
(Übersetzung von deepl)
acarasimon96 (2023-08-19 01:01:28+00:00): Points are approximate. Will need to wait for latest imagery to be able to draw buildings and surrounding features such as parking lots and updated sidewalks.
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-19 04:54:22+00:00): Again, please use more detailed changeset comments.  What did you change, and why?

You can read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140078483
Udarian (2023-08-20 08:10:33+00:00): yes, please provide more detail change set comments
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-20 09:32:06+00:00): Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?

You can read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.
---
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-20 09:31:11+00:00): Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?

You can read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map
Roani52 (2023-08-22 11:22:57+00:00): Aha, ik vermoedde al dat er een dergelijke tag zou moeten bestaan bij het maken van de (mijn) vorige wijziging. Voor in het vervolg, thanks!
user_5359 (2023-08-19 05:51:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the correct shortcut of the addr:country value is US instead of USA. It is also unusual to use this key in the USA.
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-20 09:30:34+00:00): Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?

You can read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.
---
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-20 09:29:52+00:00): Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?

You can read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.
adiatmad (2023-08-21 02:51:22+00:00): Hey, great job on your edits! Just wanted to give you a quick heads up about something. It's better to avoid using generic names like "name=building" (you can see an example here: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1199662697). Check out this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions) for more info on why.
If you're interested in learning more about mapping, there are some awesome free resources you can check out:
> Beginner's Mapping guide: https://osm.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide.
> Self-paced learning modules for intermediate/advanced mappers: https://learnosm.org
Happy mapping and keep up the good work!
NorthCrab (2023-08-19 12:26:38+00:00): Reverted for vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140092822
NorthCrab (2023-08-19 12:25:41+00:00): Reverted for vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140092785
LockOnGuy (2023-08-19 04:20:55+00:00): Hi ڕاستی, Why did you change the 'name' tag of node 8180768255 from Arabic to Kurdish?       
Here is a picture I found online of the building and it is only in Arabic, from where did you bring the Kurdish name?     
close up:  
 https://i.ibb.co/YkY2BzL/2019-08-03.jpg         
Full frame:  
  https://i.ibb.co/wS3mRsx/ABE446-FF-0315-476-E-89-C3-09-B86-BE259-FF.jpg        
Regards.
LockOnGuy (2023-08-19 04:29:14+00:00): I also see you changed the name of the street from "قازی محەمەد" to "قازی موحەمەد" please do not make the grammar wrong, this is not how the name is written. There is no "و" in the name. You are making the names wrong... Do you even speak Kurdish? if so, why typing it wrong?        
You also making the kurdish name and name:ckb diffrent which should not be the case, as I stated for you previously many times, name should be the same as the local one, and if there a different one in the same language that should be in alt_name.      
Please stop such actions and pay attention, I had left you tens of comments before and you keep ignoring them, please respond.       
Also, do not add addr: to street nodes like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5890731835/history     
Regards.
ڕاستی (2023-08-20 00:27:39+00:00): "Also, do not add addr: to street nodes like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5890731835/history "

This is a mistake.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140079115
LockOnGuy (2023-08-20 03:55:56+00:00): Ok what about the others?     
Why you keep ignoring the comments? I left you tens of comments on your changesets, please reply.
ڕاستی (2023-08-22 19:49:06+00:00): You said"Why did you change the 'name' tag of node 8180768255 from Arabic to Kurdish?"

First it is not changing name in Arabic to Kurdish, I just Added Kurdish name and the node still has Arabic under name:ar.

"Here is a picture I found online of the building and it is only in Arabic, from where did you bring the Kurdish name?"
This place clearly has a Kurdish name so when you say this place just has Arabic name you are telling lie even with the picture used as a source.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140079115
LockOnGuy (2023-08-22 21:09:45+00:00): @ڕاستی the name for n8180768255 should be the one in the sign, you have put a translation of it in the 'name' tag instead.       
You stated "This place clearly has a Kurdish name" ok, what is your source of the Kurdish name here?      
Why not using the name on the sign?
ڕاستی (2023-08-23 00:15:04+00:00): My source is local knowledge and the same source as you mentioned.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-08-22 00:35:15+00:00): porque deletou estas vias? https://osmcha.org/changesets/140079165/
Mashin (2023-08-19 10:21:45+00:00): All seems good. Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2023-08-19 17:50:31+00:00): Hi,

Did you mean to make this section of Silver Lake Road highway=primary? https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/42.46715/-83.75643
treestryder (2023-08-21 00:05:00+00:00): Yes. As it is right off the freeway, it is definitely a "primary" road in OpenStreetMap parlance.

With the Great-Lake-to-Lake trail now routed through there, I wanted to ensure that section was accurately mapped.

In fact, Witmore Lake Road should probably also be "secondary".
emersonveenstra (2023-08-22 00:36:02+00:00): hm, could you elaborate a bit more on that? According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance#Primary, my reading of that is highway=primary is for highways that connect large towns, which doesn't seem to be the case here