piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Carto'Cité (2025-05-27 12:05:54+00:00): Bonjour uAva,
Merci pour l'ajout de ce récent aménagement :

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1351896977

J'avais un doute sur le fait que ce soir une piste cyclable alors je suis allé voir sur Panoramax et il s'agit en fait d'une voie verte (Panneau C115). Je modifie dans ce sens et si tu as la moindre question ou remarque n’hésite pas :)

Photo avec le panneau C115 :
https://api.panoramax.xyz/?focus=pic&map=18.92/48.39055/2.6752296&pic=66a37a5c-0ed4-4ca9-adc4-ad660c4ffe17&speed=250&theme=default&xyz=38.63/-1.33/70

Pour les tags : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Voie_verte

Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-30 23:56:30+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam name/tags, split relevant tags properly between building and POI, and removed inappropriate service=driveway from service roads in changeset 183421987

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183421987
literan (2025-01-18 09:57:00+00:00): исправил на area:highway=residential - ну и имя Аллеи этому карману ни к чему
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-16 20:00:46+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9312507820
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1293577516

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:06:14+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801307
Osmwithspace (2025-01-16 21:25:58+00:00): Wäre hier nicht tourism=alpine_hut passender?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dalpine_hut
wolfgang8 (2025-01-17 08:33:42+00:00): tourism=hostel war bei beiden POI's von Beginn an eingetragen, daher hab ich es so übernommen. Die Beschreibung der Unterkunft auf der Website passt auch ganz gut zur Definition im Wiki.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism=hostel?uselang=de

tourism=alpine_hut wird laut Wiki für Hütten in abgelegenen Regionen verwendet, die in der Regel nur zu Fuß, mit Mountainbike oder Skiern erreichbar sind. Das dürfte bei der Hochfeldern Alm nicht der Fall sein, da dort ein Güterweg bis zur Hütte führt (am Luftbild sind geparkte Fahrzeuge erkennbar).
Marsbahisgiriss (2025-01-16 20:24:35+00:00): https://marsbahistikla.com
JesseFTW (2025-01-17 20:18:57+00:00): Looks like this changeset was a lot larger than you meant it to be. :-)
Enock4seth (2026-01-26 17:37:07+00:00): Hi, this segment is only accessible by foot? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1351905959 and why the type=bridge ? Can you please clarify
kechan (2025-01-16 20:27:47+00:00): I meant to say "added surfaces"
5m4u9 (2025-01-17 05:21:56+00:00): Hola, gracias por las ediciones en el mapa.

como recomendación general, en español no escribimos todo en mayúsculas para los nombres, suele ser con mayúscula solo las primeras letras, evitando en conjunciones (de, la, los, etc).

Respecto al molino y almacen, está mal poner ese nombre, tienes que añadir 2 puntos cada uno con su nombre propio... digamos "Molino X" y otro para "Almacen Doña Y"... tampoco no valen nombres genéricos como "almacen", si no tienes el nombre no se añade, es bueno preguntar y recién añadir al mapa. De paso puedes preguntar su teléfono u horario de atención, que es muy útil.

si tienes preguntas, me puedes escribir.
5m4u9 (2025-01-17 05:22:56+00:00): Ah, me olvidé... nombres de las personas no se añade.
Udarian (2025-01-17 19:06:52+00:00): issues with navigation software should not be fixed by removing the address of the airport from the feature. we don't map for data consumers we map what actually exists
StreetSurveyor (2025-01-18 20:13:29+00:00): There's definitely no gate. Nice find/add!
Đuro Jiří (2025-01-16 21:54:03+00:00): Questo è street side
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking=street%20side?uselang=hr
e non surface
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking=surface?uselang=hr
Corretto, saluti
eggie (2025-01-16 20:46:36+00:00): Top!
ante84 (2025-01-16 21:35:39+00:00): Hi, I just added a new road here with NVDB as reference, was there an issue?
archie (2025-01-16 21:48:05+00:00): No, not at all. I added a road as well and change two.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-01-17 21:14:33+00:00): Cycle lanes should be mapped with tags on the road. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway
fabiotofy (2025-01-17 12:39:18+00:00): Vabbè, la chiamano tutti così. Isola Kite Spot. A Grado è nota così. Anche il mondo dei surfisti conferma: https://www.surftribe.it/spot_view.php?sn=1&sd=Windsurf/Kitesurf/Surf&vn=99&vd=Spot%20guide&idCon=4&descCon=&idNaz=228&Naz=&idReg=27&Reg=&idCit=36&City=Trieste%20(TS)&id=3914
Đuro Jiří (2025-01-18 18:12:30+00:00): In quell modo si può aggiungere come loc_name, però io conosco Grado e anche molti anziani del posto e non ho mai sentito che lo qualcuno chiama così.
stasiu512 (2025-01-29 18:51:11+00:00): Przywrócenie linii sezonowych

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161909935
eggie (2025-01-17 20:05:15+00:00): Dag Just... 
Netjes ingetekend..... maarrrrrr

Als je het zo doet zal de rendering geheel wegvallen.
area is helemaal niets.
Dan kun je beter leisure=pitch sport=....  gebruiken.
en daar de surface opzetten. 
Svp adresnodes intact laten. Die zijn import vanuit het Kadaster.

We zetten toch geen accesstags als motorvoertuigen en paard=no op een atletiekbaan?
Dit gaat echt niet routeren voor die categorie. 
Daarom had ik die categorieën verwijderd.

Mapse
eggie
GiovanniPen (2025-01-16 22:07:33+00:00): Can you explain this?
Unknown Registered User (2025-01-16 22:15:43+00:00): Hi Giovanni, the way that is I just traced is a path used by hundreds of people everyday. It runs alongside the railway (but realistically, also on the railway itself, since there are no more trains passing from there)
Unknown Registered User (2025-01-16 22:21:29+00:00): People use this part of the old track as a shortcut
GiovanniPen (2025-01-17 00:23:57+00:00): you mean by walking (?)
Unknown Registered User (2025-01-17 00:28:13+00:00): of course
GiovanniPen (2025-01-17 23:26:14+00:00): i think is not necessary/correct to map this in this way. also if the line is unused is still illegal to walk there
Unknown Registered User (2025-01-17 23:32:14+00:00): I had also thought about it, but regarding legislation is actually less clear than it seems
Unknown Registered User (2025-01-18 00:13:12+00:00): after searching for (somewhat) similar cases in osm, I found https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10385844
it is too a disused railway now used as foot/bike path, on a larger scale than the one in Catania,
given that that one is simply shown as a railway, with no path, I think this segment could actually be removed
GiovanniPen (2025-01-18 10:44:22+00:00): no the one u linked is legally disused (officially deactivated in 1983), so not valid any longer as railway. in this case (cibali) is just "suspended"
Unknown Registered User (2025-01-18 11:16:20+00:00): From the wikipedia page:
"Tavola, in alcune parti, il nuovo tracciato, a doppio binario ed a scartamento ordinario, utilizzerà lo stesso sedime di quello storico a scartamento ridotto[31]; il che significa che le due linee, per quella parte di tracciato, non potrebbero coesistere."

This old line is expected to never be used again, it is marked as "disused" and not "abandoned" simply because the rail is still present.
GiovanniPen (2025-01-18 12:05:52+00:00): no, is marked as disused because LEGALLY is still active. i know what wikipedia says bcs i wrote it (with two other active user, they know well about the railway) lol
VLD549 (2025-02-18 19:11:31+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes.  I can't find the description 'Vrije' basisschool, but just 'Basisschool'.
I possibly missed something. Thank you for letting me know.
Eebie (2025-02-19 09:53:26+00:00): De officiële naam zoals opgegeven bij de overheid wordt gebruikt:  https://data-onderwijs.vlaanderen.be/onderwijsaanbod/bao/instelling?sn=14399
VLD549 (2025-05-13 15:38:44+00:00): Thank you!
stasiu512 (2025-01-16 22:10:11+00:00): Dzięki za zmianę! poprawiłem łączniki.
Baconcrisp (2025-08-19 16:56:52+00:00): Hello GJCity,

I had a question regarding you cycleway tagging. It looks like you're trying to improve routing for both cycleways and pedestrians, but how you've tagged the "trails/sidewalks" actually breaks routing in a few places like at crossings. Here's an example(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/630654779). If you check routing for this spot using the Graph View plugin in JOSM and set the parameters to either bicycle or pedestrian you see that there is a break in routing on either side of this crossing.

Could you please explain your tagging and what materials you used to tag these features in this way?

Baconcrisp
GJCity (2025-08-19 20:12:20+00:00): Hi Baconcrisp,
Thanks for calling this out. Our mapping intern recently graduated and has left the organization. so I don't think I can answer your questions, not being a mapping expert myself. That said, I did see some opportunities to make tags more clear on this particular crossing. Do the updates resolve the issue you are seeing?
Baconcrisp (2025-08-19 21:46:41+00:00): Thank you for the quick response. It looks like the plugin I was using assumed the curb was a blocking barrier which caused the "issue". That was my mistake for not noticing that.

The interns tagging scheme is a little odd so if you're alright with it I would like to offer to help tag it correctly as well as offer you assistance with mapping. I work for a local mapping company called Kaart. We have various training materials as well as a team of experienced mappers that can help you out. If that's something you're interested in, just let me know!

Thanks again for the quick response!

Baconcrisp
b-jazz (2025-01-17 18:07:44+00:00): Hey there Daviskj, thanks for your golf contributions. We all really appreciated it. But I wanted to reach out and correct a mapping method that I saw you use in hopes that it won't spread to further mapping efforts. The problem is what is referred to as "lollipops". On the 7th hole, you created two golf=rough spots in the middle of the fairway (that's great), and then you extended the fairway to diverge towards the rough, circle it, and then back out to the fairway boundary. While the goal of making sure a patch isn't referred to as both rough AND fairway is appreciated, there are better tools to do that. The correct method is to create a "multipolygon" where the fairway is the "outer" boundary and the roughs in the fairway define an "inner" boundary. It creates a topology that resembles a donut. In the iD editor, you want to select the various pieces (1 fairway and 2 inner roughs in this case) and by holding down shift when selecting the 2nd and 3rd objects. Then you can right click and select "Merge", or just type "c" for the keyboard shortcut. It's pretty easy.

If you have any questions/comments, I'd love to hear them. Thanks!
Daviskj (2025-01-19 07:09:51+00:00): Hey B-Jazz, As you may or may not have guessed I'm a course designer for PGA2k23, and use the Lidar/OSM map data to import courses into the game. In at least some cases the "lollipops" were the "best" way to get accurate fairway data, and removing of the multi-polygon was the "best" way to have the fully fairways/greens import. It didn't seem to affect the map integrity to convert them to shapes, but I also didn't know how to undo it. (I did the same thing for Allenmore and Nile Shrine)

I wont be making any such similar changes in the future4, as I have the course data I need. Also, I didn't know how to re-merge them either (not sure how I missed the merge button), or I would have probably reverted my changes after I got he data!

Someone recently made an update to the tools I use that allows for multi-polygons to work. Us course designers are aware we occasionally screw with OSM editors hard work, and try to avoid doing too many silly things, but I appreciate the education so I can avoid/fix those inconsistencies in the future.

I also did the same for Gold Mountain golf course in Gort, Wa, but that should be a similar "merges"/C fix. I don't believe I have any/many lollipop on that course.
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-17 13:15:23+00:00): Zdaje się że po tej zmianie poleciały relacje autobusów. Część drogi nie ma nazwy teraz nazw ulic. Nie wiem jak sprawa sygnalizacji świetlnej. Wrzuciłem zagadnienie na forum to może ktoś od takich zagadnień coś ruszy ale to może potrwać.

Dzięki za zastosowanie opcji prośba o sprawdzenie.
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-17 13:25:13+00:00): Ogólnie relacje dróg poleciały w tym restrykcje. Restrykcje może któraś była  błędna lub ktoś ją uszkodził. 

Proszę tego nie dalej nie ruszać by gdy ktoś kto ewentualnie będzie to poprawiał nie miał konfliktów na serwerze i mógł spokojnie działać.

Wiele osób jest jeszcze w pracy czy szkole. Trzeba czekać.
Marek-M (2025-01-17 17:00:49+00:00): Poprawiłem edycję w CS: https://www.osm.org/changeset/161463852
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-17 17:12:43+00:00): Widz, że odchudziłeś też o parę jak myślałem zbędnych sygnalizatorów.

nosekbk - po korekcie Marka trzeba trochę czasu czasu by routingi zatrybiły nową wersję (jeden do paru dni).
nosekbk (2025-01-17 17:20:08+00:00): Właśnie nie byłem pewien jak dokładnie te edycje poprowadzić a usunięcie jednego node'a wywaliło mi warningi. Wolałem, żeby ktoś na to zerknął kto się zna. Dzięki za pomoc!
theDM (2025-01-16 23:33:22+00:00): Prawidłowa nazwa tego mostu to Most Wantowy im. Jana Pawła II.
stasiu512 (2025-01-16 23:48:39+00:00): Nazwa mostu tak, lecz nie ulicy która nim przechodzi
stasiu512 (2025-01-16 23:52:18+00:00): Tutaj nazwa mostu jest prawidłowa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/620028818#map=15/54.35598/18.69433
theDM (2025-01-17 00:05:14+00:00): alt_name z III Tysiącleciem spotykam się pierwszy raz. Most Wantowy im. Jana Pawła II albo Most Wantowy jest częstym określeniem. To pierwsze można dać też jako drugie alt_name, a to drugie jako loc_name.
theDM (2025-01-17 00:05:39+00:00): ew. loc_name = Most Wantowy im. Jana Pawła II.
stasiu512 (2025-01-17 00:27:05+00:00): na tablicy widnieje/widniał taki zapis https://pl.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_im._Jana_Paw%C5%82a_II_w_Gda%C5%84sku#/media/Plik%3AMostJP2_Gdansk_tablica.JPG
theDM (2025-01-17 01:16:34+00:00): to zostaje loc_name = Most Wantowy im. Jana Pawła II lub Most Wantowy, bo to chyba w Gdańsku najpopularniejsze określenie
bielebog (2026-05-31 19:55:20+00:00): Auf dem Parkplatz habe ich keinen Shop sehen können.Wo liegt der denn genau? Und ist eigentlich das Hotel Pension Sennetreff noch aktiv?
GOD84 (2025-03-06 01:25:07+00:00): Unlock
Mannivu (2025-01-17 08:11:27+00:00): Ciao e grazie per la tua modifica!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161437194
wanderingmagus (2025-01-18 02:15:32+00:00): How do you reopen this
BCNorwich (2025-01-18 07:34:40+00:00): Hi, Many features dragged out of alignment here, I think I've replaced all of them.
smsm1 (2025-01-18 08:54:28+00:00): Thanks for sorting, I thought I'd hit undo on all the cases that is managed to drag a larger object accidentally. Based on my phone GPS the road needed a bit of realignment. I'll try and get the trace off the GPS and see if that's more accurate.
felipeeugenio (2025-01-17 00:46:24+00:00): Hola. En un ambiente digital las contracciones no tienen mucho sentido. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(do_not))
Hace un tiempo eliminamos todos los Psje. Avda. etc....
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161437933
0x00cl (2025-01-17 01:21:42+00:00): Entendido. Como una señaletica tenia la contracción lo dejé como alt_name
Adam850 (2025-01-22 00:12:43+00:00): Looks good. I agree with this change, it matches street signs.
b-jazz (2025-01-23 19:43:22+00:00): After seeing the changeset boundary, I realized I made two mistakes. One in Cottage Grove and another in Creswell. Both have been fixed now.
b-jazz (2025-01-23 19:44:40+00:00): And (hopefully) my final update to all of the "North" names in Springfield was made in the following changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161686781. Nice to get this standardized finally. Sssh, don't tell Google. They've still got it wrong in many places.
voltairovicz (2025-01-17 07:47:16+00:00): Hejka, Widze ze Lewiatan jest teraz zdublowany na dwoch znacznikach. Moglbys to poprawic? ;)
ralley (2025-01-27 06:30:01+00:00): According to AT (https://data-atgis.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/ATgis::bus-stop/explore) bus stop 7528  (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3337444706) is named "Jellicoe Road".  The roundabout was replaced years ago
santamariense (2025-01-17 19:29:40+00:00): Olá Edson Tomoda,

Dicas para deixar o seu serviço funcional no mapa. Você precisa adicionar o rótulo office=lawyer, o rótulo de horário de atendimento, os rótulos de endereços e os rótulos de contato. Assim seu negócio estará funcional no OSM e nas aplicações que nele se baseiam.

Como está mapeado o seu negócio até agora: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12508335032

Exemplos de outros na mesma categoria com mais informações, na qual você pode se inspirar para detalhar o seu negócio:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5127044014

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378360562

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11632434438

Qualquer dúvida, fique a vontade para perguntar.

santamariense
CurlConnoisseur (2025-01-17 00:48:23+00:00): https://www.lubavitch.com/centers/117711
CoyKoi (2025-01-19 09:45:09+00:00): Please stop putting descriptions in the name field.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161438929
aharvey (2025-01-17 02:32:51+00:00): hi thanks for the edit here. Per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only the name value should only reflect the street name, in this case being a private driveway it likely doesn't have a name therefore name should be omitted/empty.

The fact that it is a Private Driveway can be specified with access=private + highway=service + service=driveway, then it being a shared driveway is specified with driveway=pipestem. I've improved the tags based on this.
Razorback77 (2025-01-17 02:37:33+00:00): OK -thanks for letting me know.
@LOVEFLOWERS (2025-01-17 01:40:10+00:00): LOVE FLOWERS
mrpulley (2025-12-13 10:51:27+00:00): Confirming that maxspeed is correct here (checked at survey)
stasiu512 (2025-01-17 06:52:06+00:00): Zastanawiam się czy linie highway w tunelu  nie powinny mięć rozwiniętej nazwy zgodnie z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic
theDM (2025-01-17 15:21:59+00:00): Jeżeli obecne jest niepoprawne, to można dać to pełne jak w dokumentacji.
Nathaniel Taulbut (2025-01-17 02:07:52+00:00): If they are simply private roads, they can be tagged as such. Private roads are still mapped.
TOCruns (2025-01-17 02:13:13+00:00): Hi Nathaniel, one is a private road, one is non-existant?
Nathaniel Taulbut (2025-01-17 02:18:59+00:00): Hi, yeah deleting the non-existent road is fine. It looks like you deleted part of the private road; if you could add that back in that would be great. Thanks!
nevw (2025-01-17 05:57:13+00:00): Hi, There is difference in the spelling of the name of the drive way you added and the road it connects to. Also we don’t use abbreviated road names…so Rd should be Road.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219965817#map=15/-38.60196/145.61522&layers=D
mrpulley (2025-12-13 10:46:20+00:00): Confirming that maxspeed is correct here (checked at survey)
amtplskaart (2025-01-17 06:47:58+00:00): Sdr. ichsansy2901, sebenarnya apa yang Anda maksud dengan "does not match the path how to make a gps line and color select" dan mohon perhatikan kaidah-kaidah editing yang baik agar kualitas OSM semakin baik bukan malah semakin buruk. Hubungi kami jika Anda perlu bantuan teknis, saya sudah memberikan nomor kontak saya di personal message sebelumnya. Terima kasih
Kovoschiz (2025-01-23 13:31:07+00:00): Please don't add project titles as descriptor labels to `name=` , which is for proper names only. OSM is a digital geographic database, not a printed paper map. This topic was discussed recently, and the compromise is decided to be named as Abcville "Site".
Kovoschiz (2025-01-23 13:32:51+00:00): Cf "Yip On Factory Estate Site, Kowloon Bay" https://www.pland.gov.hk/pland_en/resources/approved_pb/hd_pb/index.html
nevw (2025-12-22 01:16:42+00:00): I notice you have accidentally dragged a couple of nodes here.
Do you want me to fix them?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=161440816
amtplskaart (2025-01-20 06:59:54+00:00): Please be aware when you are editing the geometries. Please check the crossing ways, shared nodes between highways and natural/landuse (most of the time natural and landuse did not share nodes).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161440932
NeisBot (2025-01-17 04:32:37+00:00): Hi _BAR_, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 5 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=161441098
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-17 07:06:17+00:00): Thanks for your private message and confirming that the deletions were intentional.

However, your changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/161441480
woodpeck (2025-01-17 22:58:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17115 asking _BAR_ to stop deleting trails.
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-17 07:07:14+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161441460
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-17 07:07:32+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161441448
f_husni (2025-01-17 10:14:50+00:00): hallo. di way/1324583208 anda mengedit landuse tetapi objek landuse nya berdempetan dengan highway atau jalan. mohon diperhatikan sebelum mengupload data di osm
rskedgell (2025-01-17 09:11:10+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. If you're trying to add your company to the map, you'll need to add tags to the building like "name", "website", "contact:phone", etc. so that data consumers know you're there.

You also need to add a tag which tells data consumers what sort of business you are. I think the closest fit may be office=transport, but you'll have to look at the documentation and decide for yourselves - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aoffice%3Dtransport

If you would like any help, please feel free to ask.
eerib (2025-01-17 05:07:24+00:00): These deletions were done by a user with a previous history of vandalism of mountain bike trails.
eerib (2025-01-17 05:03:47+00:00): The North Shore Mountain Bike Association has posted a blog post that says this trail is planned to be decommissioned by Metro Vancouver Water District staff.

https://nsmba.ca/trail-decommissioning-and-sabotage/

The trail access tags already reflect the closure status.

The trail has not been confirmed to have been completely decommissioned and should not be deleted as a result. Once sufficient decommissioning is confirmed the prefix "demolished" or "removed" should be added to the highway path tag.
eerib (2025-01-17 05:04:12+00:00): The North Shore Mountain Bike Association has posted a blog post that says this trail is planned to be decommissioned by Metro Vancouver Water District staff.

https://nsmba.ca/trail-decommissioning-and-sabotage/

The trail access tags already reflect the closure status.

The trail has not been confirmed to have been completely decommissioned and should not be deleted as a result. Once sufficient decommissioning is confirmed the prefix "demolished" or "removed" should be added to the highway path tag.
AndyB_66 (2025-09-24 19:16:12+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian